this investigation is a cross sectional study ( descriptive - analytical ) that was conducted in iran . in this study , 40 local ethical committees in all universities of medical sciences throughout the country were evaluated by scientific committee 's members . its members included three main investigators of the project that have been quite familiar with objectives and data collection of this study . data collection was performed by using determined questionnaire ; its validity and reliability was confirmed by who and scientific committee through pilot study . the questionnaires were completed by secretaries or informed experts of ethics committees , with regard to documentation based on signed recorded minutes by members of local ethical committee and also all of the completed questionnaires were checked and signed by undersecretary for research in university of medical sciences ; and so , all of them are reliable . if it was necessary , or there was ambiguity in a question , the phone numbers of two members of scientific committee were recorded in questionnaires . the six main subjects include : a ) activities of local ethical committee at the university / school of medical sciences ; b ) the general policies of the local ethical committee ; c ) activities of the last session of the local ethical committee ; d ) ethics training ; e ) management 's support ; and f ) additional meetings . qualitative part had open questions that included problems in six categories concerning  ethics in research  and their opinion to solve them . quantitative data analysis was performed by spss software version 11 ( chicago il usa ) . statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05 ( two tailed ) and qualitative data was analyzed according to content analysis approach , but in this article , we presented the quantitative results . in this research , permission of the ethics committee has been obtained and ethical principles in gathering information , completing surveys and data analysis is considered and results have presented for all of the stakeholders . also confidentiality was assured and all of the respondents were free from any pressure without any conflict of interests . the first local ethical committee in research was established in 1985 in shahid beheshti university of medical sciences and by 2006 all of the universities of medical sciences have established local ethical committees . each committee has 5 to 11 members and more than 50% of these committees with about 7 - 8 members have organized meetings . in more than 80% cases , written guidelines for selecting the committee 's members are available but in 4 medical universities , these guidelines were not available . in 11 universities , no female members were found in these committees but in most universities at least one woman has been a member and one university has 4 female members in combination with male members . selection of committee 's head in 66% of cases was done by highly experienced regular employee . in 28 committees , the minimum number of members for official session is at least 3 and in 28 committees , the presence of at least 4 - 5 members is considered official . the composition of the ethical committee in the medical universities in iran about half of these committees did not impose any regulations regarding the removal of any committee member . replacement of absent members , did not take place in more than 85% of the committees . 65% of the committees have written guidelines and 75% of these guidelines have been referred to in the national or international ethical regulations . all universities are required to perform an ethical review for research involving traditional or complementary medicine . the initial evaluation of research proposals are implemented on the 34 local ethical committees established within the universities and it is being stressed to the researchers that suggestions must be presented in a written form . in 95% of the ethical committees , in order to assess the ethical standards for a research proposal , a research protocol is required from the researcher . in half of the local ethical committees , penalties for non - compliance with the regulations are considered , and most of these penalties are implemented by suspending the research followed by a withdrawal of funding and a referral to the higher decision making committee . the type of punishment it should be mentioned that some of penalties are common . from 37 universities , the last meeting organized was planned beforehand . the number of members presented in that meeting was variable from 13 in one committee to 4 in six committees . the total number of research proposals evaluated in the last meeting of local ethical committees in all universities was 563 and the average number of research projects evaluated was 15.2(table 3 ) number of members and research proposal evaluated in last meeting the most important protocols reviewed in these committees during their last meetings were as follow : 
 procedures or documentation to obtain informed consent from potential subjects , including clarity and comprehensiveness of documentation and certificate of consent ( 80%)criteria for withdrawing subjects or discontinuing study including possible need for a data and safety monitoring board ( 68%)medical or health risks and benefits for study participants or community ( 62%)acceptability of level of medical care / health services provided in light of risk to subjects ( 55%)having a direct or potential benefit in the present or future , for people in the subgroup , geographical region or country in which the research is to be conducted ( 7% : at least)about 40% of research procedures may not be respectful of local culture 
  procedures or documentation to obtain informed consent from potential subjects , including clarity and comprehensiveness of documentation and certificate of consent ( 80% ) criteria for withdrawing subjects or discontinuing study including possible need for a data and safety monitoring board ( 68% ) medical or health risks and benefits for study participants or community ( 62% ) acceptability of level of medical care / health services provided in light of risk to subjects ( 55% ) having a direct or potential benefit in the present or future , for people in the subgroup , geographical region or country in which the research is to be conducted ( 7% : at least ) about 40% of research procedures may not be respectful of local culture the final reference for decision making related to research projects in majority of cases ( 97.6% ) was the head of the committee . the committees in 50% of cases have provided ethics training specifically for their members . in 10 committees , special supports to complete the ethical forms for the researchers and members are being accepted in 12 committees ; and ministerial and managerial supports in all universities are provided . at least in one university , there is a scientific review committee in lieu of an ethical review committee in terms of ethics evaluation . in 16 universities , the main reason or driving force which leads to an ad - hoc ethical review committee , in the most cases , was request of researchers . the number of members presented in that meeting was variable from 13 in one committee to 4 in six committees . the total number of research proposals evaluated in the last meeting of local ethical committees in all universities was 563 and the average number of research projects evaluated was 15.2(table 3 ) number of members and research proposal evaluated in last meeting the most important protocols reviewed in these committees during their last meetings were as follow : 
 procedures or documentation to obtain informed consent from potential subjects , including clarity and comprehensiveness of documentation and certificate of consent ( 80%)criteria for withdrawing subjects or discontinuing study including possible need for a data and safety monitoring board ( 68%)medical or health risks and benefits for study participants or community ( 62%)acceptability of level of medical care / health services provided in light of risk to subjects ( 55%)having a direct or potential benefit in the present or future , for people in the subgroup , geographical region or country in which the research is to be conducted ( 7% : at least)about 40% of research procedures may not be respectful of local culture 
  procedures or documentation to obtain informed consent from potential subjects , including clarity and comprehensiveness of documentation and certificate of consent ( 80% ) criteria for withdrawing subjects or discontinuing study including possible need for a data and safety monitoring board ( 68% ) medical or health risks and benefits for study participants or community ( 62% ) acceptability of level of medical care / health services provided in light of risk to subjects ( 55% ) having a direct or potential benefit in the present or future , for people in the subgroup , geographical region or country in which the research is to be conducted ( 7% : at least ) about 40% of research procedures may not be respectful of local culture the final reference for decision making related to research projects in majority of cases ( 97.6% ) was the head of the committee . the committees in 50% of cases have provided ethics training specifically for their members . in 10 committees , special supports to complete the ethical forms for the researchers and members are being accepted in 12 committees ; and ministerial and managerial supports in all universities are provided . at least in one university , there is a scientific review committee in lieu of an ethical review committee in terms of ethics evaluation . in 16 universities , the main reason or driving force which leads to an ad - hoc ethical review committee , in the most cases , was request of researchers . the number of members presented in that meeting was variable from 13 in one committee to 4 in six committees . the total number of research proposals evaluated in the last meeting of local ethical committees in all universities was 563 and the average number of research projects evaluated was 15.2(table 3 ) number of members and research proposal evaluated in last meeting the most important protocols reviewed in these committees during their last meetings were as follow : 
 procedures or documentation to obtain informed consent from potential subjects , including clarity and comprehensiveness of documentation and certificate of consent ( 80%)criteria for withdrawing subjects or discontinuing study including possible need for a data and safety monitoring board ( 68%)medical or health risks and benefits for study participants or community ( 62%)acceptability of level of medical care / health services provided in light of risk to subjects ( 55%)having a direct or potential benefit in the present or future , for people in the subgroup , geographical region or country in which the research is to be conducted ( 7% : at least)about 40% of research procedures may not be respectful of local culture 
  procedures or documentation to obtain informed consent from potential subjects , including clarity and comprehensiveness of documentation and certificate of consent ( 80% ) criteria for withdrawing subjects or discontinuing study including possible need for a data and safety monitoring board ( 68% ) medical or health risks and benefits for study participants or community ( 62% ) acceptability of level of medical care / health services provided in light of risk to subjects ( 55% ) having a direct or potential benefit in the present or future , for people in the subgroup , geographical region or country in which the research is to be conducted ( 7% : at least ) about 40% of research procedures may not be respectful of local culture the final reference for decision making related to research projects in majority of cases ( 97.6% ) was the head of the committee . the committees in 50% of cases have provided ethics training specifically for their members . in 10 committees , special supports to complete the ethical forms for the researchers and members are being accepted in 12 committees ; and ministerial and managerial supports in all universities are provided . at least in one university , there is a scientific review committee in lieu of an ethical review committee in terms of ethics evaluation . in 16 universities , the main reason or driving force which leads to an ad - hoc ethical review committee , in the most cases , was request of researchers . in wrapping up the finals of the study done through local ethical committees , it was determined that one of the problems concerning local ethical committee composition was lack of experts in ethical course . it is clear that there are a few experts in committee considering the high number of committees , for example about 27% of committees do not have any ethicist and about 90% of committees do not have any scientist in other disciplines . oguz ( 2003 ) founded that the number of people with formal education in research ethics is too low to meet the demands of studies involving human subjects.5 in turkey , for instance , education in research ethics is optional in part because the founders of recs ( research ethics committees ) were academics , self - educated and willing to participate in recs regardless of their knowledge of ethics . once this practice was accepted , no further mention of education in ethical evaluation was made.6 the results in our study showed that , all of the local ethical committees have spiritual leaders in our compositions but there is not any representative from patient or community and only in 2 local ethical committees , a philosopher attends the sessions . another important issue in these committees is lack of written guidelines in 35% of them . results showed that the regulation is vague , unclear , different in each university , and inconsistent with iranian culture . the regulation needed to be modified and some other instructions in variety of issues need to be added to it . medical ethics with its methodology and practical approach , on one hand , requires sufficient knowledge of medicine and new technology , and on the other hand because of its value - laden nature , it is mutually related to religion , culture , philosophy , and law . also the policy makers and scientists should carry out some endeavors to prepare appropriate law , codes and guidelines based on international regulations , cultural and socioeconomic situation and religious beliefs for iran.7 another study in australian health ethics committee ( ahec ) , shows that the membership is specified in the act and draws on expertise in philosophy , the ethics of medical research , public health and social science research , clinical medical practice and nursing , disability , law , religion , and health consumer issues.8 molyneux and geissler ( 2008 ) indicated that the abstract principles of existing codes are very hard to apply in practice ; history , geography , culture , gender - relations and economic status can have important implications for the way in which  universal  ethical principles and guidelines are prioritized and applied in different contexts . despite this fact , they also believed that although many guidelines emphasizes the need to adapt recommendations to local circumstances , there is a risk of guidelines being interpreted and drawn upon far more narrowly than was originally intended.9 also there was inequality in composition of committees , because there were no female members in 26.8% of committees and there was only 1 female member in majority of them . regarding the last session , results showed that in average , 15 proposals were reviewed in these sessions that provided additional evidence for problems concerning  session structure  . it is very exciting , that in one of the committees , 192 proposals were presented in the last session . it seems that all of the annually projects in one committee were evaluated in one session ! in almost half of the universities , there was one council for evaluating the projects regarding ethics and scientific matters ; and it is incompatible with the ethics guidelines . in summarize , the challenges faced by the committees members in iran compared to international ethical regulations include : inappropriate session 's structure , faults in regulation , lack of executive supportive rules for committee decisions , lack of financial support from committee members in local ethical committee practice , ethical review policies , training on ethics , and institutional support . policymakers with cooperation of other scientists should develop a standard guideline for local ethical committees in medical sciences according to international regulations , cultural and socioeconomic situation , and religious beliefs in iran . the first author was main investigator and the corresponding author was main co- investigator and the other authors were active in executive phase and data analysis .
background : local ethical committees in medical sciences in iran were established in 1999 in order to assess and evaluate the observance of ethical standards throughout the universities and research centers . 
 the purpose of this study is to analyze the situation of local ethical committees in order to develop research ethics guideline.methods:for this cross - sectional study which has been conducted with the support of who , 40 local ethical committees in all universities of medical sciences were evaluated by use of determined questionnaires.results:in this study , 40 universities of medical sciences participated ; all of them have established local ethical committees . 
 each committee has 5 to 11 members and in more than 80% cases , written guidelines for selecting the committee 's members are available . 
 the minimum number of members for official session is at least 3 and replacement of absent members , did not take place in more than 85% of the committees . 
 informed consent in 95% of these local ethical committees is available . in all committees 
 , researches regarding the use of human subjects are under ethical consideration . in half of the local ethical committees , 
 penalties for non - compliance with the regulations are considered . 
 the average number of research project evaluated in last session of these committees was 15.2 and the committees in 50% of cases have provided ethics training specifically for their members.conclusions:policymakers should develop a standard guideline for local ethical committees in medical science universities in iran .