, a lot has changed in the way these fractures are managed . from conservative treatment ( including hip spica and pin traction ) with bed rest , to the operative fixation with modern surgical techniques and implants , we have come a long way . early attempts at surgical management were marred by poor asepsis , lack of intraoperative imaging , poor implant design and quality , and incomplete understanding of fracture mechanics . the modern era of hip fracture fixation began in 1925 when smith peterson introduced a triflanged nail . the real benefit of fixation lies not in improving union rates ( intertrochanteric fractures rarely go into nonunion , even when treated conservatively ) , but in improving functional outcome and mortality rates , which are attributed to the early mobilization and better nursing care possible after surgery . many implants have been used for fixation : smith peterson nail , jewett nail , trochanteric buttress plate , angled blade plate , gotfried percutaneous compression plate enders nail , dynamic hip screw ( dhs ) , medoff plate , cephalomedullary nails , and proximal femur locking plates . pugh and massie first developed the dhs in 1950s by modifying the sliding hip screw systems and quickly became the gold standard . even as widespread use of dhs revealed some complications , it is still considered the gold standard by many . the two important complications related to dhs are uncontrolled collapse and lag screw cut - out ( with or without varus collapse ) . although intramedullary nails are fast becoming the preferred choice for unstable fractures , their use is also associated with many complications : screw cut - out / blade cut - out ( including z effect and reverse z effect ) , varus deformity , lateral wall blowout during reaming , difficult insertion in curved femurs , peri - implant fracture ( subtrochanteric fractures in short nails ) , and implant breakage . anatomically contoured locking plates ( proximal femur locking compression plate [ pflcp ] ) have been developed to provide an angular stable construct and prevent screw cut - out and varus failure . a randomized prospective comparative study was carried out in a level i trauma center between june 2011 and june 2013 . a total of 52 patients ( 26 in dhs group and 26 in pflcp group ) were enrolled based on inclusion and exclusion criteria . inclusion criteria were patients who gave consent for inclusion into the study , age > 18 years , and closed intertrochanteric fractures . exclusion criteria were patients refusing to give consent , ao type 31a3 fractures , neurovascular injury , open fractures , associated ipsilateral or contralateral major limb injury ( including fractures ) affecting the treatment or rehabilitation protocol , associated upper limb fractures requiring surgery , and major systemic illness ( malignancy , chronic kidney , liver disease , etc . ) . ethical standards according to the helsinki declaration of 1964 ( and its later amendments ) were conformed to . all patients were put on skin traction upon admission and a thorough history and clinical examination was done along with the relevant preoperative work - up . the radiographs obtained included ap pelvis x - ray , and ap and lateral views of the affected hip . cefoperazone sulbactam 1 g was used as prophylactic antibiotic ( administered 30 min before incision ) . the surgical approach was the same in all cases ( lateral approach ) , except somewhat more distal exposure in pflcp group , depending on the length of the plate . a drain was routinely used in all cases and removed at 48 h. in bed , mobilization was allowed from 1 postoperative day . in dhs group , toe - touch weight bearing was allowed earlier , usually within 7 days , while in pflcp group , we allowed toe - touch weight bearing only at 6 weeks or later ( depending on fracture pattern and stability of fixation ) . follow - up was done at 6 , 12 , 16 , and 24 weeks , and 3 monthly thereafter till radiological union . twenty - six patients were enrolled in each group , with a minimum follow - up of 12 months . the mean age was 55.23 years for dhs group ( 2476 years ) and 56.46 years for pflcp group ( 2378 years ) , with the maximum number of patients between 60 and 70 years of age ( 38.46% in dhs group and 42.3% in pflcp group ) . males outnumbered females in both groups ( 17:9 dhs group , 15:11 pflcp group ) . mechanism of injury was a fall in most cases ( 77% dhs group , 73% pflcp group ) . ao scheme was used to classify the fractures ; in dhs group , 13 were type 31a1 and 13 were type 31a2 , while in pflcp group , 12 were type 31a1 and 14 were type 31a2 [ table 1 ] . analysis of preoperative parameters the mean duration of surgery was less than an hour in dhs group while it was 93 min in pflcp group . postoperative blood transfusion was required in only 7.69% patients in dhs group while in pflcp group it was 23% . radiological union was achieved in mean duration of 17.6 weeks in dhs group and 18 weeks in pflcp group . functional outcomes using harris hip score were good to excellent in 84.7% patients in dhs group and 88.4% in pflcp group . 38.7% of patients with type 31a2 fractures in dhs group developed significant limb shortening of more than 2 cm after radiological union while none in pflcp group demonstrated any significant shortening [ table 2 ] . analysis of peri- and post - operative parameters no mortality was recorded in our series . no general complication from surgeries such as septicemia , deep vein thrombosis , pulmonary embolism , stroke , and myocardial infarction was encountered . nonspecific hip pain was noticed in 2 cases of pflcp and 1 case of dhs . varus deformity was observed in 1 case of dhs group ( ao 31a2.3 fracture ) . superficial wound infection was noted in 2 cases of pflcp and 1 case in dhs group . there was 1 case each of implant cut - out and medialization of shaft in dhs group . figures 1a and b show intraoperative fluoroscopy images during placement of pflcp ; and figures 2a and b , and 3a and b show radiographs ( preoperative and postoperative ) of two cases managed with pflcp . figures 4a and b show radiographs ( preoperative and postoperative ) of a case managed with dhs . complications following surgery ( a and b ) intraoperative fluoroscopy images ( a and b ) pre- and post - operative radiographs of a case treated with proximal femur locking compression plate ( a and b ) pre- and post - operative radiographs of another case treated with proximal femur locking compression plate ( a and b ) pre- and post - operative radiographs of a case treated with dynamic hip screw mechanisms of dhs and pflcp are quite different in the sense that dhs allows controlled collapse of fracture while locking plate is an angular stable construct preventing any shortening or collapse . owing to the locking construct , theoretically , pflcp also has a lower risk of varus collapse and screw cut - out . although earlier biomechanical studies showed pflcp to be equivalent or stronger than other fixation constructs in pertrochanteric and neck fractures , more recent studies have shown intramedullary nails to be superior . the current dictum for management of intertrochanteric fractures is ,  no lateral wall , no hip screw  . the absence of a stable lateral buttress causes medialization of shaft and varus collapse of head and screw cut - out . in these fractures , either a nail or a locking plate should be used , not a dhs . we did not include ao 31a3 fractures in our study as it would have interfered with the randomization process , and also because we routinely nail such fractures at our institution . superficial wound infection was observed in 2 cases of pflcp and 1 case in dhs group . there was 1 case each of implant cut - out and medialization of shaft in dhs group [ table 3 ] . review of recent studies comparing dynamic hip screw with proximal femur locking compression plate for intertrochanteric fracture fixation limitations of our study include limited sample size , no correlation of results to severity of osteoporosis , and inclusion of both stable and unstable fractures . we have made following observations when using pflcp to fix intertrochanteric fractures , especially the unstable ones : 
 delayed weight bearing : toe touch walking is to be delayed till at least 6 weeks in unstable fractures with limited posteromedial cortical contact ( earlier weight bearing might be done in undisplaced fractures or where perfect posteromedial cortical continuity has been reestablished before fixation ) . full unassisted weight bearing should be permitted only after unionlow threshold for open reduction : once plate is applied , there is no scope for collapse and subsequent increase in cortical contact . hence , if any doubt exists , open reduction must be done before fixation to ensure adequate posteromedial contactavoid fixing in distraction : no collapse is possible postoperatively . although most fractures will heal even with slight distraction , there will always be a risk of implant breakage before fracture healscareful plate positioning : optimal positioning of plate and proximal head screws must be ensured in ap and lateral projections . proximal screws should be as long as possible ( preferably within 510 mm of subchondral bone ) , inferior most head screw ( kickstand screw ) should skirt and engage the calcarlow threshold for bone grafting : although we could find only one study describing primary autologous bone grafting in unstable intertrochanteric fractures , we are of the opinion that it might be a useful procedure . because many surgeons would consider it an overkill , a useful strategy is to assess the need for bone grafting at around 2 months of time , when decision is being made to progressively increase the weight bearing of the patient . 
  delayed weight bearing : toe touch walking is to be delayed till at least 6 weeks in unstable fractures with limited posteromedial cortical contact ( earlier weight bearing might be done in undisplaced fractures or where perfect posteromedial cortical continuity has been reestablished before fixation ) . full unassisted weight bearing should be permitted only after union low threshold for open reduction : once plate is applied , there is no scope for collapse and subsequent increase in cortical contact . hence , if any doubt exists , open reduction must be done before fixation to ensure adequate posteromedial contact avoid fixing in distraction : no collapse is possible postoperatively . although most fractures will heal even with slight distraction , there will always be a risk of implant breakage before fracture heals careful plate positioning : optimal positioning of plate and proximal head screws must be ensured in ap and lateral projections . proximal screws should be as long as possible ( preferably within 510 mm of subchondral bone ) , inferior most head screw ( kickstand screw ) should skirt and engage the calcar low threshold for bone grafting : although we could find only one study describing primary autologous bone grafting in unstable intertrochanteric fractures , we are of the opinion that it might be a useful procedure . because many surgeons would consider it an overkill , a useful strategy is to assess the need for bone grafting at around 2 months of time , when decision is being made to progressively increase the weight bearing of the patient . we conclude that dhs and pflcp are both good choices for stable intertrochanteric fractures , and both lead to excellent functional outcomes . the choice depends on surgeon 's preference and comfort level with the routine use of the implant . nice ( national institute for health and care excellence ) guidelines state dhs as the implant of choice for stable fractures . however , the controversy is still on and large multicenter prospective trials comparing dhs , pflcp , and intramedullary nails are needed to reach a conclusion . one must understand that each device has its unique set of limitations and complications . in our opinion , both are comparable with regard to functional outcome , but nonunion might be more common with pflcp .
introduction : intertrochanteric fractures are common in elderly population and pose a significant financial burden to the society . 
 anatomically contoured proximal femur locking compression plate ( pflcp ) is the latest addition in the surgeons armamentarium to deal with these fractures . 
 it creates an angular stable construct , which will theoretically lessen the risk of failure by screw cut - out and varus collapse , the common mode of dhs failure . 
 we compared dhs with pflcp in ao type 31a1 and 31a2 intertrochanteric fractures.materials and methods : a randomized prospective study was carried out between june 2011 and june 2013 . 
 26 cases each of dhs and pflcp were included.results:functional and radiological outcome was similar in both groups.conclusion:both dhs and pflcp are good choices for stable intertrochanteric fractures , and both lead to excellent functional outcomes , but non - union might be more common with pflcp .