Identifying Similar Patients Using Self-Organising
Maps: A Case Study on Type-1 Diabetes Self-care
Survey Responses

arXiv:1503.06316v1 [cs.CE] 21 Mar 2015

Santosh Tirunagari∗ , Norman Poh† , Guosheng Hu‡ and David Windridge§
University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH
Email: ∗ s.tirunagari@surrey.ac.uk, † n.poh@surrey.ac.uk, ‡ g.hu@surrey.ac.uk, § d.windridge@surrey.ac.uk
Abstract—Diabetes is considered a lifestyle disease and a well
managed self-care plays an important role in the treatment.
Clinicians often conduct surveys to understand the self-care
behaviours in their patients. In this context, we propose to use
Self-Organising Maps (SOM) to explore the survey data for
assessing the self-care behaviours in Type-1 diabetic patients.
Specifically, SOM is used to visualise high dimensional similar patient profiles, which is rarely discussed. Experiments demonstrate
that our findings through SOM analysis corresponds well to the
expectations of the clinicians. In addition, our findings inspire the
experts to improve their understanding of the self-care behaviours
for their patients. The principle findings in our study show: 1)
patients who take correct dose of insulin, inject insulin at the
right time, 2) patients who take correct food portions undertake
regular physical activity and 3) patients who eat on time take
correct food portions.

I.

I NTRODUCTION

Diabetes is a major health problem in the present world.
It is caused due to the presence of excess glucose within the
blood. It is of two kinds: 1) Type-1 and 2) Type-2. Type1 diabetes is a condition where the immune cells attack the
insulin manufacturing cells. As a result, patients with Type-1
diabetes cannot produce insulin and need insulin injections to
survive. It is estimated that Type-1 diabetes constitutes 10%
to 15% of the total diabetic patients in the world. The Type-1
diabetes appears usually before 40 years of age. It is the most
common type of diabetes found in the children [1]. Type-1
diabetes is typically represented as a ‘lifestyle disease’, as a
result it is common in patients: 1) who do not perform enough
physical activity 2) who are obese (having excess body weight)
and 3) have high cholesterol. Hence, to effectively manage this
disease we consider the following self-care factors.
•

Check blood glucose with monitor.

•

Record blood glucose results.

•

Check ketones when glucose level is high.

•

Take correct dose of insulin.

•

Take insulin at the right time.

•

Eat the correct food portions.

•

Eat meals/snacks on time.

•

Keep food records.

•

Read food labels.

•

Treat low blood glucose with just the recommended
amount of carbohydrate.

•

Carry quick acting sugar to treat low blood glucose.

•

Come in for clinic appointments.

•

Wear a medic alert ID.

•

Exercise.

•

Adjust insulin dosage based on glucose values, food,
and exercise.

Daily insulin injections, healthy diet and regular physical
activity are the most important factors that influence the
treatment for this disease. Therefore, we in this study aim
to analyse these self-care factors using statistical machine
learning methods.
A. Motivation for using SOM
Health care survey data contain a wealth of information
about the patient behaviours. Identifying similar patients with
poor self-care behaviours helps clinicians in suggesting suitable treatment plans. The survey data are usually heterogeneous and contain missing values. Applying traditional statistical methods might give clinicians overly simplified conclusions. Therefore, there is a need for statistical machine-learning
tools such as SOM for the data analysis. SOM algorithm is a
well applied data analysis technique for mining correlations
and clustering similar responses in the surveys. The clustered
responses in the higher dimensions are mapped onto a 2dimensional grid for visualisation. This makes SOM a suitable
method in visualising high-dimensional data by revealing more
meaningful insights.
Previously, SOM has been used to visually explore data
in the datasets such as: financial [2], gene expression [3]
and linguistics [4]. A paper by Toronen et al. [5] has used
SOM algorithm to analyse yeast gene expression data and
showed that SOM is an excellent tool for the analysing and
visualising gene expression profiles. Mehmood et al. [6] found
interesting correlations between countries and nutrition, health
and lifestyle using SOM analysis. Tirunagari et al. used SOM
analysis to correlate causal factors associated with different
types of maritime accidents in [7] as well as identifying patient
profiles who are in need of selfcare management in [8]. Lagus
et al. [9] applied SOM in analysing loneliness questionnaire

data to identify profiles of loneliness for improving the social
well being among the different sub groups.
B. Objectives
The main objectives of this study are two-fold. Firstly,
from the computational perspective, we would like to examine the feasibility of using SOM as a means of extracting useful information from survey questionnaires. Secondly,
from the scientific perspective, we would like to understand
if the responses collected from the Type-1 Diabetes survey
are reasonable and correspond to what domain experts and
clinicians would expect. For instance, is it possible to answer
the following questions:
•

How are the individual patients grouped together?

•

How are the self-care factors correlated?
Fig. 1. Distribution of age with the majority of participants being between
the ages of 25 and 70.

C. Contributions
Our contributions can thus be summarised as follows:
•

Novel use of SOM for visualising similar patients
from the data Although SOM has been widely used
in exploring the survey data, its uses in visualising
similar patient profiles are rarely discussed. Our approach of visualising similar patient profiles will prove
to be useful, as concurred by the domain experts.

•

Improved understanding We will demonstrate that
the visual analytics provided by SOM can improve
experts’ understanding of the impact of self-care behaviours of patients with Type-1 diabetes.

Therefore, SOM is a potentially viable tool for analysing highdimensional questionnaire responses as well as a means for
visually summarising individual patients data.
D. Organisation
The organisation of the paper is as follows: In section II,
we present the survey dataset. In section III, we present method
SOM. Experiments and results are discussed in section IV
in cluing data preprocessing and imputation (filling out the
missing values). Finally, in section V, we draw conclusions
and summarise with the discussions.

III.

M ETHODS

To explore the survey dataset we have used self organising map (SOM). SOM also known as Kohonen map is an
unsupervised technique that is most often described in the
language of artificial neural networks. SOM provides a way of
representing multidimensional data in two or three dimensions.
This process of reducing the dimensionality of vectors is based
on a data compression technique known as vector quantisation.
In addition, SOM creates a network that stores information
in such a way that any topological relationships within the
training set are maintained. Hence, SOMs are useful for
visualising large data sets of high dimensionality. SOM is an
unsupervised, competitive learning approach in which only one
neuron wins each training phase. There are no connections
between the neurons in input and output layer. However, they
communicate with each other via a neighbourhood function.
If a neuron wins in training phase, it will also impact its
neighbours.
Let us consider the input vector
x = [x1 , x2 , ..., xn ]T

The synaptic weight vector of the neuron i in the output layer
of 2-dimensional neurons is
wi = [wi1 , wi2 , ..., win ]T , i = 1, 2, · · · , m;

II.

DATASET

The survey consists of 611 patients’ responses for the 15
self-care behaviours [8]. The participants were all above 18
years of age with Type-1 diabetes. The responses for the selfcare behaviours are one of the following: 1) Never 2) Rarely 3)
Sometimes 4) Usually and 5) Always. The highest percentage
of respondents is in their mid forties to early fifties as shown
in Figure 1.
Male participants represent 45% of the survey population
while female respondents constitute 55%. The level of education has 91% of respondents with some forms of qualification.

(1)

(2)

where, m is the number of output neurons and wiv is the
weight associated with neuron m and variable v. Although,
the output neurons are arranged in 2-dimensional array, their
weight vectors are n-dimensional i.e. same dimensions as the
input vector x. The Euclidean distance kx − wi k2 of the
current input vector x to all the weight vector i = 1, 2...m
is computed. The winning neuron is one whose weight vector
wq has the minimum Euclidean distance to x, i.e.,
q(x) = argmini kx − wi k2

(3)

The weight vectors of the winning neurons and the neurons in
its predefined neighbourhood ηq are updated using a gradient

descent, leading to the following update rule:

Check blood glucose with monitor

wi (k + 1) = wi (k) + ηqi (k)[x(k) − wi (k)]

(4)

Neurons outside the neighbourhood are not updated i.e
ηq (k) = 0 and neurons inside the neighbourhood ηq are
updated using equation (5):
ηqi (k) = µ(k).

(5)

The learning parameter µ(k), where 0 < µ(k) < 1 decreases
with increasing iterations. The learning process has two phases:
1) ordering phase (rough training phase) and 2) convergence
phase (fine training phase). In ordering phase, the topological
ordering of the weight vectors is carried out. The learning
parameter µ(k) is set close to unity. In convergence phase,
the self-organising map is fine-tuned, which is achieved by
setting the learning parameters µ(k) in the order of 0.01. The
stopping criterion for the SOM algorithm is the number of
specified iterations or the smallest degree of change in the
weight vectors.
IV.

E XPERIMENTS AND R ESULTS

In this section we identify similar patient profiles based on
their self-care behaviours and present the results for factors
relating to: 1) managing blood glucose 2) insulin intake 3)
food and 4) physical activity.
A. Data preprocessing
The data preprocessing included the conversion of string
values into categorical numerical values for ease of computation. This conversion makes the data analysis computationally
inexpensive. For ‘NA’ results we used 0, ‘Always’, ‘Often’,
‘Sometimes’, ‘Rarely’ and ‘Never’ are scored as 5, 4, 3, 2 and
1 respectively, and for NaNs the appropriate missing value
using Matlab’s ‘knnimpute(Data)’ function.
After the data preprocessing, 611 patient responses to 15
self-care factors are given as an input (611 − by − 18) to the
SOM algorithm 1 . The SOM program outputs a 2-dimensional
visualisation map of patients groups across the considered selfcare factors. In this experiment we have chosen 30×30 grid for
visualisation. The colorbar in the figures shows the user rating
i.e ’Never’ corresponding to darker blue, ’Rarely’ to lighter
blue, ’Sometimes’ to green, ’Usually’ to yellow and ’Always’
to orange.
B. Blood glucose
Self-testing for blood sugar is very essential in managing
a healthy diabetic treatment plan. This may help in preventing
any long-term complications associated with diabetes. Regular
checking for blood sugars help in: 1) judging how well
the patient is reaching the overall treatment plans and 2)
understanding how diet and exercise affect the blood sugar
levels. From Figure 2, we see that patient ids corresponding to
{260, 9, 24, 402, 435, 281, 139, 243} are rarely checking their
blood glucose levels. It can also be noticed that more than
90% of the respondents are usually or always checking their
blood glucose levels.
1 http://www.cis.hut.fi/projects/somtoolbox/

5

924402410283

53 97441 12145817973 46533360104 252 419456572536232220243
305 218362 254
212
376
23823
281
132
592377
492 188
215
355 222153
173
139
268 109 381
184 438
120505
581
1
404
597 43510613 143
453270469397
79
14 113311380230 18
277583
62 10 116
101
157 246
463 595
43
282
261
80 609 228431
284
564 39928
321
504 110 20
423204439
46445535
64
52420
49 356 13333 325107
118320
551401 74 48319
85
100171338 263 470611233306 52412 22 50
51271
98499590 495 66
95 150
267
165
546
256
7 162185 288
76
408180239 326
41750637320848682
36 336134
93 241 2
103573290313 600527186
374
437114 19
194
115 176
298 330 603
474 52240 59
119
332 452
297
240 331
135
47
219224 12340661
258154 295
517289
278 269
327 579451
604
27117
39 21
20625292542207 128274 189518
68170 610415242
15939342 56285 136
237
482588 534192308
348448324272169
510
156 379
32360358 363525 352 594
385 460
152 41334
78
87
446
426 364 339 94461
294 302182606 31
479
361
54 57014517201124 337 412
303
51 15
3833599 427
280244287 344571
262105490
127
65
489
60763
367309
528250
255291467225343 91 493 70
203
414 433 9
6
257
340484
3 300
316221265231 26
90 480
125
16
147
58353 259
108
471
195407
57 44 30383
235175 4
514 382205 29
161487211151
345 279
365405
138
88
202477476 11126 357 32436566556 409130307
454 199
350 18747246886
251509531
96 190
273
49724777 37
599196548 32872
69
146 478
481 296 266
310521 234
413513
501
197111 447580181 5 8 21416855 35 131142 4021448417437228335435131417216719134 75
260

4.51

4.01

3.52

3.03

d

2.53

Fig. 2. Patient groupings according to the ratings given for the self-care
factor: ‘Check blood glucose with monitor’.

C. Insulin
Insulin in the body helps in moving blood glucose from
the blood stream into the cells for energy. However patients
with diabetes cannot produce enough insulin. Hence they are
required to take insulin injections regularly. Taking right dose
of insulin at right time is necessary for the patients to lead an
active and independent lives.
Take correct dose of insulin
5

924402410283

53 97441 12145817973 46533360104 252 419456572536232220243
305 218362 254
212
376
23823
281
132
592377
492 188
215
355 222153
173
139
268 109 381
184 438
120505
581
1
404
597 43510613 143
453270469397
79
14 113311380230 18
277583
62 10 116
101
157 246
463 595
43
282
261
80 609 228431
284
564 39928
321
504 110 20
423204439
46445535
64
52420
49 356 13333 325107
118320
551401 74 48319
85
100171338 263 470611233306 52412 22 50
51271
98499590 495 66
95 150
267
165
546
256
7 162185 288
76
408180239 326
41750637320848682
36 336134
93 241 2
103573290313 600527186
374
437114 19
194
115 176
298 330 603
474 52240 59
119
332 452
297
240 331
135
47
219224 12340661
258154 295
517289
278 269
327 579451
604
27117
39 21
20625292542207 128274 189518
68170 610415242
15939342 56285 136
237
482588 534192308
348448324272169
510
156 379
32360358 363525 352 594
385 460
152 41334
78
87
446
426 364 339 94461
294 302182606 31
479
361
54 57014517201124 337 412
303
51 15
3833599 427
280244287 344571
262105490
127
65
489
60763
367309
528250
255291467225343 91 493 70
203
414 433 9
6
257
340484
3 300
316221265231 26
90 480
125
16
147
58353 259
108
471
195407
57 44 30383
235175 4
514 382205 29
161487211151
345 279
365405
138
88
202477476 11126 357 32436566556 409130307
454 199
350 18747246886
251509531
96 190
273
49724777 37
599196548 32872
69
146 478
481 296 266
310521 234
413513
501
197111 447580181 5 8 21416855 35 131142 4021448417437228335435131417216719134 75
260

4.61

4.23

3.84

3.45

d

3.06

Fig. 3. Grouping for similar patients according to the ratings given for the
self-care factor: ‘Take correct dose of insulin’.

Patient ids corresponding to {243, 281, 139, 404} sometimes take correct dose of insulin as shown in Figure 3. It
is interesting to notice that the same group of patients rarely
take insulin at the right time as shown in Figure 4. We also
notice that patients taking correct dose of insulin also take
insulin injections at the right time.

Take insulin at the right time

Eat meals/snacks on time
5

924402410283

53 97441 12145817973 46533360104 252 419456572536232220243
305 218362 254
212
376
23823
281
132
592377
492 188
215
355 222153
173
139
268 109 381
184 438
120505
581
1
404
597 43510613 143
453270469397
79
14 113311380230 18
277583
62 10 116
101
157 246
463 595
43
282
261
80 609 228431
284
564 39928
321
504 110 20
423204439
46445535
64
52420
49 356 13333 325107
118320
551401 74 48319
85
100171338 263 470611233306 52412 22 50
51271
98499590 495 66
95 150
267
165
546
256
7 162185 288
76
408180239 326
41750637320848682
36 336134
93 241 2
103573290313 600527186
374
437114 19
194
115 176
298 330 603
474 52240 59
119
332 452
297
240 331
135
47
219224 12340661
258154 295
517289
278 269
327 579451
604
27117
39 21
20625292542207 128274 189518
68170 610415242
15939342 56285 136
237
482588 534192308
348448324272169
510
156 379
32360358 363525 352 594
385 460
152 41334
78
87
446
426 364 339 94461
294 302182606 31
479
361
54 57014517201124 337 412
303
51 15
3833599 427
280244287 344571
262105490
127
65
489
60763
367309
528250
255291467225343 91 493 70
203
414 433 9
6
257
340484
3 300
316221265231 26
90 480
125
16
147
58353 259
108
471
195407
57 44 30383
235175 4
514 382205 29
161487211151
345 279
365405
138
88
202477476 11126 357 32436566556 409130307
454 199
350 18747246886
251509531
96 190
273
49724777 37
599196548 32872
69
146 478
481 296 266
310521 234
413513
501
197111 447580181 5 8 21416855 35 131142 4021448417437228335435131417216719134 75
260

4.53

4.06

3.59

3.12

d

2.65

4.9

924402410283

53 97441 12145817973 46533360104 252 419456572536232220243
305 218362 254
212
376
23823
281
132
592377
492 188
215
355 222153
173
139
268 109 381
184 438
120505
581
1
404
597 43510613 143
453270469397
79
14 113311380230 18
277583
62 10 116
101
157 246
463 595
43
282
261
80 609 228431
284
564 39928
321
504 110 20
423204439
46445535
64
52420
49 356 13333 325107
118320
551401 74 48319
85
100171338 263 470611233306 52412 22 50
51271
98499590 495 66
95 150
267
165
546
256
7 162185 288
76
408180239 326
41750637320848682
36 336134
93 241 2
103573290313 600527186
374
437114 19
194
115 176
298 330 603
474 52240 59
119
332 452
297
240 331
135
47
219224 12340661
258154 295
517289
278 269
327 579451
604
27117
39 21
20625292542207 128274 189518
68170 610415242
15939342 56285 136
237
482588 534192308
348448324272169
510
156 379
32360358 363525 352 594
385 460
152 41334
78
87
446
426 364 339 94461
294 302182606 31
479
361
54 57014517201124 337 412
303
51 15
3833599 427
280244287 344571
262105490
127
65
489
60763
367309
528250
255291467225343 91 493 70
203
414 433 9
6
257
340484
3 300
316221265231 26
90 480
125
16
147
58353 259
108
471
195407
57 44 30383
235175 4
514 382205 29
161487211151
345 279
365405
138
88
202477476 11126 357 32436566556 409130307
454 199
350 18747246886
251509531
96 190
273
49724777 37
599196548 32872
69
146 478
481 296 266
310521 234
413513
501
197111 447580181 5 8 21416855 35 131142 4021448417437228335435131417216719134 75
260

4.21

3.52

2.83

2.14

d

1.45

Fig. 4. Grouping for similar patients according to the ratings given for the
self-care factor: ‘Take insulin at the right time’.

Fig. 6. Grouping for similar patients according to the ratings given for the
self-care factor: ‘Eat meals on time’.

D. Food

E. Physical activity

Eating of balanced food is an integral part of diabetes care
and management. Diet control, balanced food selection, portion
size and timely consumption of the food influences the diabetes
treatment plan. Managing food as a self-care factor reduces the
symptoms of diabetes by keeping the blood sugar levels and
body weight under control.

Physical activity helps in keeping the weight under control.
Keeping a healthy weight prevents diabetic complications.
Exercise manages the blood sugars to stay in the target
range. It also helps the insulin to move glucose from the
blood stream into the cells for energy. Hence, exercise can
be considered a cornerstone of diabetes management, along
with diet and medication. Figure 7 shows the grouping of the
patients according to their ratings for the factor ’Exercise’. It is
seen that patients taking correct food portions perform regular
physical activities.

Eat the correct food portions
4.97

924402410283

53 97441 12145817973 46533360104 252 419456572536232220243
305 218362 254
212
376
23823
281
132
592377
492 188
215
355 222153
173
139
268 109 381
184 438
120505
581
1
404
597 43510613 143
453270469397
79
14 113311380230 18
277583
62 10 116
101
157 246
463 595
43
282
261
80 609 228431
284
564 39928
321
504 110 20
423204439
46445535
64
52420
49 356 13333 325107
118320
551401 74 48319
85
100171338 263 470611233306 52412 22 50
51271
98499590 495 66
95 150
267
165
546
256
7 162185 288
76
408180239 326
41750637320848682
36 336134
93 241 2
103573290313 600527186
374
437114 19
194
115 176
298 330 603
474 52240 59
119
332 452
297
240 331
135
47
219224 12340661
258154 295
517289
278 269
327 579451
604
27117
39 21
20625292542207 128274 189518
68170 610415242
15939342 56285 136
237
482588 534192308
348448324272169
510
156 379
32360358 363525 352 594
385 460
152 41334
78
87
446
426 364 339 94461
294 302182606 31
479
361
54 57014517201124 337 412
303
51 15
3833599 427
280244287 344571
262105490
127
65
489
60763
367309
528250
255291467225343 91 493 70
203
414 433 9
6
257
340484
3 300
316221265231 26
90 480
125
16
147
58353 259
108
471
195407
57 44 30383
235175 4
514 382205 29
161487211151
345 279
365405
138
88
202477476 11126 357 32436566556 409130307
454 199
350 18747246886
251509531
96 190
273
49724777 37
599196548 32872
69
146 478
481 296 266
310521 234
413513
501
197111 447580181 5 8 21416855 35 131142 4021448417437228335435131417216719134 75
260

4.21

Exercise

3.45

2.69

1.94

d

1.18

Fig. 5. Grouping for similar patients according to the ratings given for the
self-care factor: ‘Eat the correct food portions’.

Figure 5 and Figure 6 have similar outlook revealing the
correlation between them. From these figures, we see that
patients who are not taking meals on time also do not take
correct food portions. Similarly, patients eating on time take
correct food portions.

4.97

924402410283

53 97441 12145817973 46533360104 252 419456572536232220243
305 218362 254
212
376
23823
281
132
592377
492 188
215
355 222153
173
139
268 109 381
184 438
120505
581
1
404
597 43510613 143
453270469397
79
14 113311380230 18
277583
62 10 116
101
157 246
463 595
43
282
261
80 609 228431
284
564 39928
321
504 110 20
423204439
46445535
64
52420
49 356 13333 325107
118320
551401 74 48319
85
100171338 263 470611233306 52412 22 50
51271
98499590 495 66
95 150
267
165
546
256
7 162185 288
76
408180239 326
41750637320848682
36 336134
93 241 2
103573290313 600527186
374
437114 19
194
115 176
298 330 603
474 52240 59
119
332 452
297
240 331
135
47
219224 12340661
258154 295
517289
278 269
327 579451
604
27117
39 21
20625292542207 128274 189518
68170 610415242
15939342 56285 136
237
482588 534192308
348448324272169
510
156 379
32360358 363525 352 594
385 460
152 41334
78
87
446
426 364 339 94461
294 302182606 31
479
361
54 57014517201124 337 412
303
51 15
3833599 427
280244287 344571
262105490
127
65
489
60763
367309
528250
255291467225343 91 493 70
203
414 433 9
6
257
340484
3 300
316221265231 26
90 480
125
16
147
58353 259
108
471
195407
57 44 30383
235175 4
514 382205 29
161487211151
345 279
365405
138
88
202477476 11126 357 32436566556 409130307
454 199
350 18747246886
251509531
96 190
273
49724777 37
599196548 32872
69
146 478
481 296 266
310521 234
413513
501
197111 447580181 5 8 21416855 35 131142 4021448417437228335435131417216719134 75
260

4.33

3.69

3.05

2.41

d

1.77

Fig. 7. Grouping for similar patients according to the ratings given for the
self-care factor: ‘Exercise’.

V.

C ONCLUSIONS AND D ISCUSSIONS

This study shows the significance of SOM method for
inferring useful information from the surveys. The results
obtained using SOM analysis in this study provide a good
understanding of the patient self-care behaviours. This study
was also successful in identifying similar patient profiles that
are in need of adjusting their lifestyles. The principle findings
in this study show: 1) patients who take correct dose of insulin
inject insulin at the right time, 2) patients who take correct food
portions undertake regular physical activities and 3) patients
who eat on time take correct food portions.
By attaining a better understanding of the patterns present
in the behaviour of patients through machine learning, we are
presented with the opportunity to classify patients who are in
need of lifestyle adjustments in order to improve self care.
Being able to target those who are most in need of assistance
in developing life style changes will allow for improvements
in the efficiency at which hospital resources are used. It can
be difficult for the less affluent to attain self care tools in
countries without national heath care [10]. Identifying those
who are most likely to be in need and making this apparent to
clinicians can provide a more efficient allocation of hospital
resources. This can result in more affordable self care tools
for those who are likely to poorly manage their diabetes or
provide free self care tools to those targeted as in need.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The funding for this work has been provided by Department of Computing and Centre for Vision, Speech and Signal
Processing (CVSSP) - University of Surrey.
R EFERENCES
[1]

[2]
[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

T. M. Frayling, N. J. Timpson, M. N. Weedon, E. Zeggini, R. M.
Freathy, C. M. Lindgren, J. R. Perry, K. S. Elliott, H. Lango, N. W.
Rayner et al., “A common variant in the fto gene is associated with body
mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity,” Science,
vol. 316, no. 5826, pp. 889–894, 2007.
G. Deboeck and T. Kohonen, Visual explorations in finance: with selforganizing maps. Springer London, 1998, vol. 2.
P. Tamayo, D. Slonim, J. Mesirov, Q. Zhu, S. Kitareewan, E. Dmitrovsky, E. S. Lander, and T. R. Golub, “Interpreting patterns of gene
expression with self-organizing maps: methods and application to
hematopoietic differentiation,” Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 2907–2912, 1999.
T. Honkela, S. Kaski, K. Lagus, and T. Kohonen, “Websomselforganizing maps of document collections,” in Proceedings of WSOM,
vol. 97, 1997, pp. 4–6.
P. Törönen, M. Kolehmainen, G. Wong, and E. Castrén, “Analysis of
gene expression data using self-organizing maps,” FEBS letters, vol.
451, no. 2, pp. 142–146, 1999.
Y. Mehmood, M. Abbas, X. Chen, and T. Honkela, “Self-organizing
maps of nutrition, lifestyle and health situation in the world,” in
Advances in Self-Organizing Maps. Springer, 2011, pp. 160–167.
S. Tirunagari, M. Hanninen, K. Stanhlberg, and P. Kujala, “Mining
causal relations and concepts in maritime accidents investigation reports,” International Journal of Innovative Research and Development,
vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 548–566, 2012.
S. Tirunagari, N. Poh, K. Aliabadi, D. Windridge, and D. Cooke, “Patient level analytics using self-organising maps: A case study on type-1
diabetes self-care survey responses,” in Computational Intelligence and
Data Mining (CIDM), 2014 IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 2014, pp.
304–309.

[9]

K. Lagus, J. Saari, I. T. Nieminen, and T. Honkela, “Exploration of
loneliness questionnaires using the self-organising map,” in Artificial
Neural Networks and Machine Learning–ICANN 2013. Springer, 2013,
pp. 405–411.
[10] G. Soltesz, C. Patterson, and G. Dahlquist, “Diabetes in the young:
a global perspective,” IDF Diabetes Atlas. Brussels: International
Diabetes Federation, 2009.

