Applying a Differential Evolutionary Algorithm to a Constraint-based
System to support Separation of OTDR Superimposed Signal after Passive
Optical Network Splitters
Lima, Gerson F. M; Lamounier, Edgard; Barcelos, Sergio; Cardoso, Alexandre; Peretta, Igor; Muramoto, Willian; Barbara, Flavio

Abstract— The FTTH (Fiber To The Home) market currently
needs new network maintenance technologies that can,
economically and effectively, cope with massive fiber plants.
However, operating these networks requires adequate means for an
eﬀective monitoring cost. Especially for troubleshooting faults that
are associated with the possibility of remote identification of fiber
breaks, which may exist in the network. This is of great value for
operators. Optical Time Domain Reﬂectometry (OTDR)
techniques are widely used in point-to-point optical network
topologies. Nevertheless, it has major limitations in tree-structured
PONs (Passive Optical Networks), where all different branches
backscatter the light in just one conventional OTDR trace with
combined signals arriving on the OLT (Optical Line Terminal)
side. Furthermore, passive power splitters used in FTTH networks
input large attenuation, impoverishing the reflected signal. This
makes the identification of the very branch affected by the problem
practically impossible, when considering conventional analyses
[32]. From this scenario, arrives the PON network operator’s
requirement for an innovative solution that allows the precise
identification of the affected branch. The use of constraint-based
techniques have been applied in a large amount of applications for
Engineering Design, where the duties imposed for graphics and
equations constraints result in valued features to CAD/CAE
software capabilities. Currently, it provides a faster decision
making capacity for engineers. This work applies the constraintbased approach along with a Differential Evolutionary Algorithm
to separate the superimposed OTDR signals, after the splitters of a
FTTH Passive Optical Networks. This research introduces a new
set of algorithms performing a coupling to an Optical Network
(ON) CAD Design with its correspondent OTDR measurement
signal, considering its geographical distribution branches of
diﬀerent lengths after the splitter. Results of this work are
presented in a FTTN (Fiber To The Node) prototype arrangement,
using a 1:8 passive power splitter.
Keywords: FTTH, FTTN, OTDR data analyzing, Failure detection,
Differential Evolution, CAD/CAE Constraints, Network monitoring,
PON.

1-INTRODUCTION
Over the last 30 years, optical fiber communication
technology has come down in price. Essentially, long
distances and the metropolitan telecommunication
market have fostered it. Thus, by considering economic
feasibility, technical superiority and market demand,
optical fibers will definitively replace the twisted pairs in
home access networks. Moreover, Fiber to the Home
(FTTH) technology has arrived. Passive Optical

Networking (PON) is an economically viable technology
for providing ultra-broadband FTTH access networks [1].
This viability is achievable through the shared network
infrastructure model employed. A non-shared
infrastructure model, in which a dedicated fiber runs from
the central office to each home, multiplies the
engineering costs, instead of sharing it. It also demands
terminals that are more active, more space in the central
offices and more energy supply, which therefore
increases risk of failure.
Therefore, the PON model has become the choice
for providing Fiber to the Home (FTTH) networks. A FTTH
plant will gradually replace the copper wire pair network.
Optical fibers will then be in the service of an enormous
number of homes. This poses a great level of concern:
how to efficiently and economically speed up the network
test? In addition, how to repair the massive FTTH network
plants in the future? A variety of Optical Time Domain
Reflectometry (OTDR) testing methods have been
designed for the verification and troubleshooting of
PON’s. These include testing all points from the optical
network terminal (ONT) to the central office (CO).
Furthermore, other methods include testing the feeder
part of the network from the CO, and in some cases,
simply not testing at all [2].
In fact, OTDR methods provide reliable results.
Besides, since it is a single-ended method, it significantly
reduces staff time. One perceived drawback is the cost of
the OTDR instrument when added to the required user
skill level. In addition, reflectometric signals are
processed by software using different methodologies to
recognize events, failures and degradations in the optical
fiber. Point-to-point fiber networks [3] have dominated
this matter for some time. However, for FTTH PON
architectures, several new challenges arise when testing
using optical passive power splitters [4].

One solves this problem by either testing from
the ONT side or testing up to the splitter position only.
The former is a non-economical solution, as it
would require an enormous amount of testing
instruments and well-trained field technicians [5]. The
latter can only see the feeder part of the network, i.e.,
from the CO up to the splitter position, which is usually
less prone to network`s failure portion. After the splitter,
the OTDR measurement brings little information because
the Rayleigh scattering is strongly attenuated by the
double-passage through the splitter [6]. This is because
the 64 backscattered signals, from the PON branches,
superimpose the OTDR receiver. This makes it impossible
to recognize events from single PON branches. Besides,
traditional OTDR technology has a low dynamic range
when used with short OTDR pulses, which is a
requirement for PON measurements.
PON using tree topology or P2MP configuration is
one of the most promising solutions for fiber-to-theoffice (FTTO), fiber-to-the-business (FTTB), fiber-to-thecurb (FTTC), fiber-to-the node (FTTN) and FTTH, since it
breaks through the economic barrier of traditional P2P
solutions. The P2MP cable plant provides branching
optical paths from the telecommunications operators
switching equipment (Optical Line Terminal – OLT) to
more than one contiguous location. Thus, portions of the
optical paths are shared by traffic to and from multiple
locations [6].
Passive optical splitter (power splitting
element/branching device) or optical coupler is a device
used to broadcast an optical signal from one fiber to many
others. In the most general case, the optical splitter is
configured as 1xN – 1 input port to N output ones. Optical
signals on the input port are branched to all output ports.
An optical splitter may also be used to multiplex the
optical signals from several fiber lines onto a single line.
However, using optical coupler poses several problems in
the OTDR testing [7]. If the OTDR is connected to the N
side of a 1xN optical splitter, then the waveform shows a
large loss, limiting OTDR’s ability to test far beyond the
optical splitter. Furthermore, when connected to the
input side of a 1xN optical splitter, the waveform shows a
smaller drop than when the OTDR is connected to one of
the N output ports. Then, a higher signal level results due

to the combined signatures of all N fibers on the
branching side of the optical coupler, which are
superimposed and makes it very difficult (sometimes
impossible) to associate events on the waveform with the
specific lines on which events occur. This is probably the
most common problem faced by technicians when
dealing with an optical passive power splitter. Some
solutions arise, such as the fiber fault, monitoring
technique, as proposed by C.H. Yeh [8] and fiber-break
monitoring system, as proposed by A.A.A. Bakar [9].
In this work, we have developed a system to
integrate the graphical network design (CAD-Computer
Aided Design / GIS-Geographical Information System)
with the OTDR measures made from CO, using an in
service dispositive. In the same solution set, the authors
implemented a Differential Evolutionary Algorithm [1, 15]
to obtain a signal separation for each branch of the
network, associating events on the OTDR signal waveform
with the specific cable design lines in which the events
occur on a map. This work used an arrangement created,
specifically, to investigate a concept proof to determine
an OTDR Splitter relation between separated branches.
To do so, we propose a superimposed mathematics
equation, which promotes the simulation of OTDR signal
after the PON splitter.
The motivation behind this work is to separate
the OTDR signal in order to plot, over a network design
map (CAD), the separated signal and use it, to provide
location based on information to improve maintenance
procedures. Therefore, the signal separation is very
important for providing an innovative tool that joins the
OTDR fiber signal separated after passing the splitter
coupled with GIS design information. The proposed
methodology is shown in Figure 1.
From the FTTN PON Design (CAD/GIS), the length
of each fiber cable that goes on to constitute the optical
network, after the splitter, is obtained, providing the
expected distance where Fresnel´s reflection [6] occurs.
From the physical network, the OTDR provides the
acquired signal record in a database and the Differential
Evolutionary Algorithm simulates each channel after the
splitter. In this work, the authors propose carrying out
these measurements during the network installation
phase using CAD Design parameters. Finally, the

separated signal for each channel is coupled to the
Network Design in a Map (Figure 1). In the following
sections, each step is described in details.
2-DERIVATION OF THE SPLITTER EQUATION
2.1-Experimental Setup
The authors designed the tested network, presented in
Figure 2, to serve as a platform for studding the
mechanisms and characteristics of an optical signal in
working (good/ideal) condition, similar to a Fiber-To-TheNode arrangement (FTTN). This setup mounts a
laboratorial OTDR in a location as if it were inside a CO
(Central Office), distributing signals to multiple ONUs
(Optical Network Units) at different locations of
residential customers (in the downstream direction),
bypassing the 1x8 optical splitter. Table 1 presents further
network details.
Table 1 - Bobbin details connected in the branches.

Branch

Insertion
Loss (dB)

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

10.375
12.173
11.438
10.088
10.804
9.684
11.219
10.50

Optical
Return
Loss
(dB)
71.14
59.61
60.14
73.25
72.18
78.01
71.94
72.65

Length
(Km)

Loss/Km
(dB/Km)

2.5420
5.6578
6.0108
5.7039
3.3251
2.5168
2.6294
19.4239
12.4718

0.2
0.190
0.224
0.200
0.233
0.193
0.219
0.203
0.223

The standard ITU recommends a 1625nm laser
source for in-service monitoring. However, in this stage,
we used a commercially available OTDR model
(MW9076D1– Anritsu) with a 1550nm laser source.
Therefore, for concept proof, this specification should not
make any relevant difference, because in this experiment
we used single-mode optical fiber [24] with a low bending
sensitivity class. When subjected to one complete turn, a
mandrel with a diameter of 20 mm should not exhibit
attenuation variation exceeding 0.75 dB at 1550 nm and

1.5 dB at 1625 nm. On the other hand, since the lengths
of the tested network branches varies from 5 to 12km,
the measurements in 1550nm and in 1625nm are very
similar to the initial proof of concept experiments. The
fiber has attenuation slightly higher in 1625 than in
1550nm (0.3dB/km). As a result, the slope will be slightly
higher. Another influence of the wavelength is the
refraction index. In our experiments, the events occur
slightly dislocated (few meters).
The authors chose this configuration as it
represents a common architecture. In this layout, a
primary 8-port splitter is installed, leaving secondary
fibers going to the secondary network until the last mile,
where one can get the OTB (Optic Termination Boxes) /
NAP (Network Access Point). Each fiber branch at its end
is cleaved, which provides 11dB of reflectance.
2.2 Measurement parameters
Few parameters need for defining the OTDR setup in
order to get best results [26]. Distance range (DR) also
known as display range. It limits the amount of displayed
fiber. The distance range affects the test accuracy and the
time required to complete tested fiber. Measurement
resolution is the space between data points. In our
experiment, we defined it with 0.5 meters. Pulse Width is
the duration of the laser pulse. By selecting a longer or
shorter pulse width, we can control the amount of
backscatter level coming back along with the dead zone
size. In this case study, we used Pulse Width of 500ns,
about 100m of resolution, allowing a good measurement
for the total length of the proposed experimental
arrangement of this work. However, it is too inaccurate
for multiple dwelling unit’s case due the small distances
involved.
In future experiments, we plan to use a pulse
width of 10ns or less to allow the separation of elements
2m apart. Nevertheless, with this pulse width it is not
possible to evaluate the signal after the splitter, only the
reflective events of the cleaved fibers immerse into the
noise.
The amount of averages is a key concept to
improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the trace and to
get a more a reliable and smoother-looking trace. In fact,

OTDR send out thousands of measurement pulses every
second. Every pulse provides a set of data points, and
then their average is joined with subsequent sets of
points. Usually, a lot of averaging is required and takes
time. We have defined the amount of averaging needed
to provide consistent results.
The conjunction of data to allow the evaluation of
results and simulations is presented in the sequence of
tests forward. We configured the OTDR using the
following parameters:







DR (Distance Range): 25Km (it should have the
smallest value greater than the maximum length
of the network, in this case 25km);
Pw (Pulse Witdh): 500ns (smallest pulse width
which allowed viewing the fiber end);
Avg (Averages): 60 (smaller number of averages
needed to observe the fiber signal with minimal
noise, researcher´s discretion);
The OTDR generates traces for each recorded
measurement into a CSV (Comma Separated
Value) text file (measurement resolution 0.5
meters).


2.3- Test sequence
The undertaken test sequence has the purpose of
providing references to the algorithm development and
concept proof. It does not mean that these tests should
be performed at the time of the network installation,
since such measures would be unfeasible in practice. We
are proposing this sequence of tests to prove the
development affirmed in this study.
Sequence A is generated by analyzing each
separate channel of the optic fibers after the splitter, thus
unplugging the others (Table 2a):

Table 2a – Tests with each separated channel.
Test Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Sequence A
Description
Only the optical fiber in channel 1 is connected, unplugging others
Only the optical fiber in channel 2 is connected, unplugging others
Only the optical fiber in channel 3 is connected, unplugging others
Only the optical fiber in channel 4 is connected, unplugging others
Only the optical fiber in channel 5 is connected, unplugging others
Only the optical fiber in channel 6 is connected, unplugging others
Only the optical fiber in channel 7 is connected, unplugging others
Only the optical fiber in channel 8 is connected, unplugging others

Sequence B is generated by analyzing a
combination of 2 on 2 channels of the optic fibers after
the splitter, thus unplugging the others and using all those
connected (Table 2b):
Table 2b – Tests with combination 2 on 2 channels.
Test Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Sequence B
Description
Optical fibers in channel 1 and channel 2 connected, unplugging others
Optical fibers in channel 3 and channel 4 connected, unplugging others
Optical fibers in channel 5 and channel 6 connected, unplugging others;
Optical fibers in channel 7 and channel 8 connected, unplugging others
Optical fibers in channel 1, 2, 3 and 4 connected, unplugging others
Optical fibers in channel 5, 6, 7 and 8 connected, unplugging others
Optical fibers in channel 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 connected

Sequence C is generated by analyzing a crescent
number of connections (Table 2c):
Table 2c – Tests with a crescent number of connections.
Test Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Sequence C
Description
Only the optical fiber in channel 1 and unplugging all others
Optical fibers in channel 1 and channel 2 connected, unplugging others
Optical fibers in channel 1, 2, 3 connected, unplugging others
Optical fibers in channel 1, 2, 3, 4 connected, unplugging others
Optical fibers in channel 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 connected, unplugging others
Optical fibers in channel 1, 2,3,4,5, 6 connected, unplugging others
Optical fibers in channel 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 connected

2.4-Splitter Equation Inference
In this section, we introduce basic knowledge concepts to
explain the splitter’s equation, used in this research.
Analyzing the physical concept of the laser beam emitted
by the OTDR equipment, the energy with value 𝜖 should
be proportional to its respective characteristic oscillation
frequency, from one hypothetical oscillator. In 1901,
Plank expressed this statement by presenting the
proportionality constant  [22].
Next, this energy was associated to the energy of
the electromagnetic wave, accounting for energy
required to create an electromagnetic field ("quantum").
Thus, this demeanor associated to a unit ("particle"), as

opposed to an electromagnetic wave, is referred to as a
"photon". Nowadays, Planck´s relation describes the
energy of each photon, in terms of photon frequency.
This is also known as Plank’s relation (Equation 1):
(Eq. 1):

𝜖 = 𝜗 ∙

Where:
𝜖 = Beam energy;
𝜗 = Beam frequency (or 1/ 𝜗 = 𝜆, the wavelength);
 = Plank’s constant.
The OTDR laser is a monochromatic beam with 𝜆
= 1550nm. Consequently, the frequency 𝜗 is constant.
Thereafter, the energy 𝜖 is conserved in the OTDR PON
Splitter. Energy density is the amount of energy stored in
a given space system or region per unit volume or mass.
Anything that can transmit energy can have an intensity
associated to it. Therefore, Law of Conservation is
focused on intensity, allowing the superimposition of
intensities presented in Figure 3:
Next, the verification of the following equation occurs:
(Eq.2):
𝑛

𝐼0 = ∑ 𝐼𝑖
𝑖=1

𝐼0 = signal intensity of the incident laser light in the
splitter.
𝐼𝑖 = signal intensity in the i-th splitter branch.
Equation 2 considers the total output power from
all splitter branches, expected to be equal to the input
power. It is very important to clarify that there are various
types of losses, which affect the performance of the
splitter design. For example, losses caused by scattering
and absorption at the fiber cladding. In this research, the
losses associated with the PON splitter are relatively small
and negligible.
Based upon adaptation of the OPLL (Optical
Phase Looked Loop) [34] and Interferometry [35], it is also
important to consider that the OTDR photo detector acts
as a mixer, since the photocurrent is proportional to the

intensity of the incident optical signal. Two optical
incident fields, occurring on the detector, result in a
current that includes a term proportional to the product
of the two fields [33]. Figure 4, presents a feedback
system that enables electronic control of the output
phase of the semiconductor lasers output, which are the
basic building blocks of most modern optical
communication networks.
Satyan [33] states that the semiconductor laser
optical phase-locked loop beam has an output
𝑎𝑠 cos(𝜔𝑠 𝑡 + 𝜑𝑠 (𝑡)), and the master laser output is given
by 𝑎𝑚 cos(𝜔𝑚 𝑡 + 𝜑𝑚 (𝑡)). Equation 3 is proposed by
[33] to the detected photocurrent, i.e. an evaluation of
two beams targeting the Photodetector (PD):
(Eq. 3)
2
𝐼𝑃𝐷 (𝑡) = 𝜌. (𝑎𝑚
+ 𝑎𝑠2 + 2𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑚 cos[(𝜔𝑚 − 𝜔𝑠 )𝑡
+ (𝜑𝑚 (𝑡) − 𝜑𝑠 (𝑡))])
Here, 𝜌 is the responsiveness of the Photodetector (PD).
Taking into consideration the OTDR laser beam, the
variation of phase is null. Thus, 2𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑚 cos[(𝜔𝑚 − 𝜔𝑠 )𝑡 +
(𝜑𝑚 (𝑡) − 𝜑𝑠 (𝑡))] is negligible, due to the behavior of the
splitter on the passive optical network. Therefore, the
only remaining part is the sum of squares.
When considering OTDR measurements, the
signal intensity 𝑃 with respect to fiber distance 𝑧, in dB, is
a well-known equation 5 log10 (𝑃(𝑧)) for measures of
gain or attenuation given by the ratio of input and output
powers of a system, or even by individual factors that
contribute to such ratios. In addition, OTDR always shows
two-way loss, which means that:
10
2𝑤𝑎𝑦
𝑃𝑑𝐵
= 5 log10 (𝑃(𝑧)) = log10 (𝑃(𝑧)) = 10 log10 (√𝑃(𝑧)).
2
Considering the superimposition of powers from
different branches𝑃𝑐 (𝑧), the conversion of the power to
linear scale is necessary since the addition of power in dB
scale is not permitted:
2𝑤𝑎𝑦

𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑛

1

2

= 105𝑃𝑐_𝑑𝐵 = 1010𝑃𝑐_𝑑𝐵 = 10

1
10

2

( 𝑃𝑐_𝑑𝐵 )

1

= (1010𝑃𝑐_𝑑𝐵 )

2

.

Grounded in these considerations, the total
power over distance for all channels (or branches / drop
fibers) is the sum of power over the distance of all
individual branches, as shown in Equation (4):

(Eq. 4):

0.1𝑃𝑐 (𝑧) )2 )
𝑆(𝑧) = 10 log10 (√∑𝑁
𝑐=1 (10

Where:
𝑃𝑐 = OTDR is the measured signal (discrete) per
channel 𝑐 of the Splitter in dB.
𝑁 = number of channels of the Splitter.
𝑧 is the fiber distance independent variable.
The authors ran validation simulations for this
equation within the sequence of tests, as presented in
Section 3.3.
The validation process considered the isolated
signals measured for each channel in the Sequence A of
tests. From these data, the authors simulated several
combinations of channels connecting sequences, shown
in B and C through the application of Equation 4. Each
simulation was then compared to the measured
combination thereof. Using MatlabTM, the OTDR CSV files
were read and respective graphics were generated with
the objective of testing the equation and having the
results validated. All tests were successful. For other
network configurations and other Split ratios a new set of
experiments are necessary.
Figure 5, presents one example of the
comparisons, where Channel 1 (blue) is measured by
OTDR and Equation 4 is simulated as a red curve. Figure
6 presents an example with four channels (Ch. 5, 6, 7 8)
and Figure 7 presents all channels to validate the
proposed Equation 4.
In all tests, the signal is zoomed from Splitter until the last
channel (dead zone). To guarantee the precision, we take
Pearson’s correlation [36]. For all figures tested, the value
is near to 1(one). Its means (mathematically) that both
variables are very similar.
The region of interest is between the splitter and the
Dead Zone. Before the Splitter, Equation 4 cannot be used
and neither in the Dead Zone. As we can see in Figure 5,
Figure 6 and Figure 7, the measured and simulated signals
are highly coherent.
3- Signal Separation
3.1-OTDR Measure Simulation

For simulation purposes, we divided the traditional OTDR
waveform of a pulse response reflection into the
following parts, represented by Figure 8 and described in
Table 3.
Table 3: Simulated Signal in Function of sample index.

Sample id
̅)
(𝒙

̅) = . ..
𝒚(𝒙

1⋯𝐴

𝑦0 + 𝑚. 𝑥̅

𝐴+1
𝐴 + 2⋯𝐵
𝐵 +1⋯𝐶
𝐶 + 1⋯𝐷

(𝑦(𝐴) + 𝑣𝑓 ). √2⁄2
𝑦(𝐴) + 𝑣𝑓
𝑦(𝐵) − 3.86(𝑥̅ − 𝐵)
𝑦(𝐶) − 2.41 ln(𝑥̅ − 𝐶) + 1

Number
of
Samples
# Samples
before
peak
11 *
4 **
# Samples
until end
of signal

(*) Common Reflectance for this particular set of
measurements, depending on the distance d between
each sample. In this work, we use d = 0.5 meters (OTDR
configuration).
(**) Dead zone observation of pre-analysis of the signal
In order to simulate the signal of one channel, we
need to implement a sort of iterators, which will write
amplitudes over an array of the same size, as the number
of samples in the measured signal. Based on the network
design project and OTDR settings, we already know the
location of the splitter. Therefore, it is fair to assume that
the proposed algorithm can consider just the samples
after the splitter, just for purposes of simulation. Suppose
this measured signal has a length (starting right after the
splitter) that could define a close interval {1 … D}
(illustrated by Figure 8) that addresses the array. In this
case, the measured signal is then represented by the
simulated amplitudes array y(x):
 Within the interval {1…A}, y(x) is defined by a linear
equation that reflects the Rayleigh backscattering
effect. In the proposed linear equation, m is the ﬁber
slope or ﬁber attenuation (typically expressed in
dB/km). In this work, we use m = atan (-1/1150) based
on the manufacturer's datasheet for the

experimented fiber and the ITU-T g.652.B standard
[12]. Considering pointing the iterator to the next
interval, i.e., to change the simulation behavior, the
trigger here is the last sample registered before the
end of the fiber. This information is also retrievable
from the network design project and OTDR settings.
 In the interval {A+1 … B}, y(x) is defined by a constant
added to the amplitude of the signal saved on the
array in the last address from the previous interval.
This constant represents Fresnel´s reflective event.
Fresnel´s reﬂection results from the discontinuity on
indices of refraction observed when a ﬁber abruptly
ends. For example, a Fresnel´s reﬂection may be
caused by the end of a cleaved ﬁber, an undermined
connector, a mated connector or a mechanical splice.
Therefore, vf is the raise of amplitude due to
reﬂection, expressed in dB. In this work, we use vf =
21, based on the manufacturer's datasheet for the
experimented fiber. Note that the very first sample of
the interval ({A+1}) uses a scale factor of
approximately 0.707 in order to smooth the
transition for the Fresnel reflective event and respect
the fact that real world discontinuities are not abrupt.
If the distance between samples are large enough,
one could dismiss this scale factor. The trigger for
changing the simulation behavior is simply after
counting up to 11 samples. This proved to be enough
considering the equipment and fibers from
experimentation and the OTDR's resolution of 0.5m
between samples.
After Fresnel´s reflection is considered, the OTDR
measured signal has two distinct behaviors [3, 11]. First,
there is a linear decline of amplitudes. After, the signal
presents an exponential declination:
 That first behavioral concept is simulated within the
interval {B+1 … C}. The simulation y(x) is here defined
by a linear equation, starting up to the amplitude of
the signal saved on the array in the last address from
the previous interval. The authors obtained angular
coefficient for this line (constant of -3.86) by
approximation from applying linear regression to
several experimental measures. The trigger for

changing the simulation behavior is simply after
counting up to 4 samples. This proved to be enough
considering the equipment and fibers from
experimentation and the OTDR's resolution of 0.5 m
between samples.
 For interval {C+1 … D}, the second behavioral concept
is implemented. The signal is considered an
exponential diminishing tail [3],[11]. We obtained the
Logarithmic coefficient (constant of -2.41) by
approximation from applying logarithmic regression
modeling to several experimental measures. This
behavior is extended until the end of the array.
The resulting array constitutes the simulated signal.
Note that the dead zone corresponds to the interval {A+1
… D}. One channel per time is simulated, according to
some parameters, and Equation 4 is then applied for
adding up the simulated signals. The summation of all
simulated channels is the final simulated signal to be
consider as a mathematical representation of the real
measured signal.
3.2-Diferential Evolutionary Algorithm
The Differential Algorithm is an evolutionary algorithm
proposed in the second half of the 1990s [13-17] for
solving optimization problems in continuous variables.
Over the last decade, this algorithm has proven to be a
successful technique for many applications, such as
neural network training, identification of parameters, and
design of devices and systems in electrical and electronic
engineering. The success of this method is based on the
mechanism of the differential mutation operator. This
operator generates new solutions starting from vectors
constructed with differential pairs of solution candidates
drawn from its own population. The differential
distribution of vectors in the space of variables for
optimization generates search directions with different
sizes, which depend on the position of the points used in
the construction of the mutant vectors. These directional
domains and step sizes fit the characteristics of the
problem, with the adaptation properties of self as the

population progresses in the direction of the “best”
solution.
A differential mutation employs the difference
between pairs of individuals in the population to generate
the current perturbation vectors called vector
differentials. However, as the algorithm progresses in the
search process, the spatial distribution of population
changes according to the landscape of the objective
𝑡 ← 1;
Initialize the population 𝑋𝑡 = { 𝑥𝑡,𝑖 , 𝑖 = 1, . . . , 𝑁};
While stop criteria do
For each 𝑥𝑡,𝑖 , 𝑖 = 1 𝑡𝑜 𝑁 do
Random Selection
𝑟1 , 𝑟2 , 𝑟3 ∈ {1, … . , 𝑁}
Random Selection 𝛿 ∈ {1, … , 𝑁}
For j = 1 to n do
If 𝒰[0,1] ≤ 𝐶 ⋁ 𝑗 = 𝛿𝑖 ,do

𝓊𝑡,𝑖,𝑗 = 𝓍𝑡,𝑟1,𝑗 + 𝜂 ( 𝓍𝑡,𝑟2,𝑗 − 𝓍𝑡,𝑟3,𝑗 )

Else 𝓊𝑡,𝑖,𝑗 = 𝓍𝑡,𝑖,𝑗 ;
End for
End for
For each 𝑥𝑡,𝑖 , 𝒾 = 1 𝑡𝑜 𝑁 𝐷𝑜
If 𝑓(𝓊𝑡,𝑖 ) ≤ 𝑓(𝓍𝑡,𝑖 ) 𝑑𝑜 𝑥𝑡+1,𝑖 ← 𝓊𝑡,𝑖
Else 𝑥𝑡+1,𝑖 ← 𝑥𝑡,𝑖
End For
𝑡 ← 𝑡 + 1;
End while

function or cost function. In turn, this change alters the
orientations and sizes of the differential vectors that can
be created from the population.
Pseudo-code of basic differential evolution
algorithm (adapted from [14]).
For this reason, the distribution of the differential
vectors, and therefore, the distribution of directions and
step sizes of perturbations, fits the landscape function.
This characteristic of self-adaptation mutation
differential evolution algorithm provides important
qualities from the point of view of optimization, such as
strength, versatility and efficiency in several problems.
Equation 5 illustrates this procedure:
(Eq. 5): 𝓊𝑡,𝑖 = 𝓍𝑡,𝑟1 + 𝜂 ( 𝓍𝑡,𝑟2 − 𝓍𝑡,𝑟3 )

with: 𝑟1, 𝑟2, 𝑟3 ∈ {1, . . . , N}. The vector 𝓊𝑡,𝑖 is the i-th
mutant solution and 𝜂 a scale factor applied to the
differential vector parameter of the differential
evolutionary algorithm. The vector 𝑥𝑡,𝑟1 applied to this
differential mutation is called “base vector”.
Using this procedure, we obtain a mutant
population 𝑉𝑡 = {𝑣𝑡,𝑖 ; 𝑖 = 1, . . . 𝑁}. The next steps in the
algorithm are very simple. Individuals in the current
population 𝑋𝑡 are recombined with individuals of the
mutant population, producing offspring or population of
test solutions 𝑈𝑡 .
In this research, we use the classical version of the
differential evolution algorithm employing the discrete
recombination with probability 𝐶 ∈ [0, 1]. It is important
that N be the number of channels (previously known since
the network design is ready and the network built). Index
𝛿 ∈ {1, … , 𝑁} is an index drawn for the random test
vector 𝑖. As sometime equality 𝑗 = 𝛿𝑖 will be verified,
this condition ensures that at least one of the parameters
of the test solution will be inherited from the mutant
individual.
Parameter 𝐶 controls the fraction of values in 𝓊𝑡,𝑖
that are copied from the mutant vector 𝑣𝑡,𝑖 . As closer to
1 the value of 𝛿 becomes, greater is the chance that the
test solution contains many values inherited from the
mutant vector. At the limit, when = 1 , the test vector is
equal to the mutant vector [17].
This work uses the chromosome representation
presented in Figure 9. Note that there is one element for
each channel of the Splitter. The 𝑦0𝑐𝑛 is the initial value
of the Power in dB in channel n after the splitter.
Each individual 𝑥𝑡,𝑖 of the population at
generation t is a possible solution of the problem and, in
the present case; structured in the form of the
chromosome described in Figure 9. The DE heuristic
search for the proper set of 𝑦0𝑐𝑛 is:
⃗⃗⃗ − ⃗𝑺)
𝐦𝐢𝐧(𝑴
𝒚𝒐 𝒄𝒏

⃗⃗ is the measured OTDR signal and 𝑆 is the
Where: 𝑀
superimposition of each one of the n simulated channels.
Note that, when this heuristic converges, one
obtains the parameters of each separated channel. The

quality pattern matching is now measured by Pearson´s
correlation between the measured signal (experiments)
and the best-simulated signal (algorithm). We have
observed repeating the experiments that correlations
above 0.97 are a necessary condition to guarantee a
satisfactory result. Unfortunately, the computational
effort is very high, spending long periods to provide a
good solution.
To deal with the performance problem, we
implemented some loops of the algorithm in parallel. This
technique creates several processes that can compute
concurrently on the same loop. A “parfor-loop” can
provide a significantly better performance than its
analogous for-loop. In our case, we try 2, 3 and 4
processes. We present a panoramic view with results, on
table 4. The differential evolutionary algorithm
parameters are presented along with the attained
correlation and processing time.
Table 4: Evolutionary Algorithm parameters evaluation.
Sample
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Algorithm Individuals Generations Correlation Time
DE
200
600
0.98268
702.76
DE
100
600
0.97586
364.03
DE
100
400
0.9563
225,918
DE
100
400
0.97988
139.06
DE
200
400
0.97476
254.27
DE
200
600
0.98278
381.5
DE
200
600
0.95621 6.561.784
DE
100
500
0.96321 170.35,05
DE
100
600
0.98104
208.85
DE
100
500
0.93996
271.18
DE
200
400
0.97921
453.24
DE
1000
300
0.94641 1125.88
DE
500
1000
0.9567
1457.00

Method
For
For
For
ParFor 4
ParFor 4
ParFor 4
ParFor 2
ParFor 4
Parfor 4
For
For
Parfor 3
Parfor 4

C
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3

ETA
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05

Note that the lowest time with highest
correlation is sample 4, which spent 139 seconds to
obtain a correlation of 0,979. We used an INTEL®
processor CORE i7 (2 GHz), with four physical processors
for this evaluation.
When we obtain correlations above 0.97 with
lower times, we observe that this method is sufficient to
guarantee the appropriate solution that proposes the
separation of the superimposed OTDR signal after the
splitter on the FTTH PON network.
Figure 10 , illustrates the difference between the
measured signal (blue) and simulated signal (red) by use
of the ED algorithm when the correlation is below 0.97. In
this example, it is possible to identify some peaks of
simulated signal that do not fit exactly in the peak of the
measured signal.

Note on the left, that the simulated signal is still
not able to fit the measured signal and on the right two
peaks are close together, requiring more iterations from
ED algorithm to guarantee the separation and the
distinguished signal.
Figure 11, presents the results obtained when the
correlations are above 0.97, with a very close match.
Figure 12, presents from left to right, all OTDR separated
channel signals in blue. The after splitter superimposed
simulated channels in green and the measured signal in
red.
4-Contraints Implementation
4.1-The Constraint Data Model for FTTH PON Network
In this work, we used Geometric and Engineering
Constraints to specify an FTTH Network Design [31].
Geometric Constraint are the existing relationships
between two different geometric entities. Engineering
Constraints are equations that represent the concepts of
physics in electronic components (e.g., Optical Power,
Optical Cable losses, Optical Connectors, Splitters,
interferences, noise frequencies filters, etc.).
Therefore, one must consider the possibility of
modifying some parameters and their propagation, either
upstream or downstream over an electronic cable
network. This automation is managed by algebraic
manipulations (solution of constraint sets) required by
the user. Refer to reference [31] for further details.
The hybrid constraints concept is the ideal
solution as a method for solving the systems` equations
and geometric constraints. These systems rely on
numeric and interactive solving techniques [32]. Graphbased models can decompose the equations into smaller
sets in order to achieve a more efficient equation work
solution.
This approach also allows for direct manipulation
of under-constrained FTTH PON network parameters.
Using a constraint engine, an evolving solution of the
constraint set is locally identified and solved, even with
the presence of constraint cycles (simultaneous
equations). In this work, we create a database with a
characterization of constraint-based approaches for the

OTDR signal and the physical network distribution by
coupling both onto a single platform.
Figure 13 shows a constraint-based set that
represents the Optical Cable and one Splitter. In the FTTH
Scheme Figure13(a) is the physical representation for the
connection between one Optical Cable (Feeder)
connected to a splitter. Figure 13(b), the Geometric
Graph, presents the current relation of geometric
constraints for each one, the optical feeder cable C1 and
for the splitter S1. Finally, the Equation Graph Figure 13(c)
is the particular equation graph for the optical cable E1.
Constraint satisfaction occurs during the network
installation phase (start-up), when the network operator
carries out a set of OTDR measurements and performs the
coupling to the network design.
Geometric and equation constraint satisfaction
occurs in the same process as for all network components
such as Feeder Cable, Splitter, Branch Cables and others.
Although the equations are different for each
component, constraint satisfaction is realized after the
geometric constraints are satisfied. After defining the
splitter position C1, its equation set E1 is placed. The
OTDR measurement trace is, in fact, a data entry of the
equation graph.
In Fact the system works as a tool to characterize
the network. Besides, constraint satisfaction is performed
to allow the correspondence of the physical network with
the optical one.
4.2- Coupling of the OTDR Signal and CAD Network
Design Signal
Each separated curve of the OTDR signal is coupled with
a CAD environment, bringing to the map (physical
representation) the correspondence with the optical
signal, in geographic coordinates. A graphic interface was
developed (Figure 14), using AutoCAD MAP 2015. Its
purpose is to provide an integrated solution between the
optical signal and the physical network design
installation. Thus, the system supports the complete FTTH
graphic design documentation. Physical cable dimensions
and geographic coordinates of network equipments are
represented in real scale in a FTTH design, located in the
city of Uberlandia, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

All symbols were created in a library to represent
the Telecom market. In addition, its connection rules are
similar to real requirements in the field.
Figure 15 presents the FTTH design tool and the
OTDR signal viewer. Note that it is possible to have in the
same space: the map (physical network) and the
separated signals generated by the proposed algorithm.
With this tool, it is possible through the “cursor”
to follow the network cable alignment observing in real
time, in a specific window, the optical signal coupled, with
the physical cable.
If exists multiple optical branches with lengths
that are almost similar which impose a dependency on
the pulse width and the OTDR resolution, the use of CAD
Network Design coupled with the each signal allows to
avoid the possibility to mislead any confusion with similar
network branches.
5- Time Response
The proposed system is composed of several phases
described above which are executed in serial sequence.
Figure 16 shows how much time at the ONU side is
necessary to the following sequence of processing
phases. From the left to right, the first phase is the OTDR
measurements process followed by the DE Signal
Separation, and sequentially followed by the coupling
signal with the Network Design in CAD/GIS environment.
Sequentially, there is a fail detection phase where the real
time signal is compared with the previous OTDR Signal
measurement saved in a Relational Database used to
compare the difference of measured signals and detect
the possible differences in order to give alerts or alarms.
6-Treatment of failures
The proposed system provide a signal separation and its
coupling with the CAD Network Design. With the signal
comparison between several measurements it is possible
to detect differences in the signal to support alerts or
alarms. However, the system is limited to detect major
failures as for example a cutting of some optical cable or
some very sharp bend that generates relevant
modifications in the detected signal. Other problems such

as bending, fiber cracks and performance are not
addressed in this work. Any cracks or disconnects will also
cause reflections rather than backscattering which is the
expected behavior of a normal fiber. To prevent this
problem the calibration tool is suggested to avoid its
possibility.
7-Practical Implementation / Calibration tool

with other similar systems such as SANTAD [18] and FPM
[32]. Table 5 presents the results.
Table 5- Comparative study.
Feature
Centralized monitoring from CO
Locate network over a CAD / GIS
system
Separate Superimposition of
signal
Fault alarm detection
Signal simulation features

The method proposed in this work, assumes that the
length of each branch in the network is known in advance
to the central monitoring system, in addition to its GIS
position. The authors assume that this data can be
obtained during the installation of the fiber at the initial
activation tests recommended by quality assurance
procedures recommended by regulatory agency tests. A
computer based surveillance tool to support the system
calibration (figure 17). Through this tool it is possible to
compare the field measurements with the design values.
Allowing the calibrating of the system. Both in the initial
phase of installation of the network also to be carried out
periodically during normal network operation. Regarding
the fiber aging process that affect the performance of our
approach and thus verify the actual lengths found in
OTDR measurements of the network and correct it values
if it is necessary.
Using this tool, it is possible to compare the lengths of the
branches of idealized network in the projects and
compare one by one with the OTDR measures in the field.
In Figure yy it is possible to observe the system interface
developed, the left side, User can open the CAD screen
and select branches of the designed network, just below
it is possible to select the file measures in the field carried
out in real time by the OTDR. On the right side, it is
possible to compare each of the channels and adjust the
value to the be adopted by the system. Once done this
process, the User saves the data to a database containing
the calibrated values.
8-Results Comparison
To emphasize the features of this development we
performed a comparison study considering the system
proposed in this research, referred to as NETMAP along

Graphical user interface (GUI)
processing capabilities

NETMAP

SANTAD

FPM

X
X

X
-

X
-

X

-

-

X
-

X
X

X
-

This work is still in its early stages and we still have
not implemented the routines for Fault detections yet nor
implemented a special Graphical interface for use with
the operators in the central office. However, the
demonstrated capability to separate the superimposed
signal and couple it with a graphics network design
contributes towards configurations.
9-Conclusions
We have presented a novel strategy to simulate the OTDR
measurement signal after the PON Splitters. A
superimposition equation is proposed in such way that,
when joined with a differential evolutionary algorithm, it
allows for the determination of the power parcel diverted
after the splitters for each channel. It also allows for the
separation of the OTRD signal for each channel.
Still, the separated signal of each channel was
coupled with a real scaled CAD/GIS network design
resulting in a tool to create FTTH PON projects and to
contribute to surveillance proceedings.
The authors propose to realize these
measurements during the network installation phase.
However, in order to identify new reflective
events (excessive bend or cable cut) additional research
is required.
The system provides a map with a network design
tool that allows the user to evaluate the network coupled
with the optical signal.
It is also important to highlight the proposed PON
Splitter equation 4, allowing for a computational
simulation.

Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank CAPES and FIBERWORK
for sponsoring this research work.
References:
[1] Lima, Gerson F. M; Lamounier, Edgard;Barcelos,Sergio
“A TEO-Based Algorithm to detect events over OTDR
Measurements in FTTH PON Networks”, 4TH IEEE LATINAMERICAN CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS 2012
,7-9 NOVEMBER, CUENCA - ECUADOR.
[2] S. Chabot and M. Leblanc, “Fiber-Optic Testing
Challenges in Point-to-Multipoint PON Testing ”,
EXFO
Application
Note
110,
http://documents.exfo.com/appnotes/anote110-ang.pdf
[3] Dennis Derickson; “Fiber optic test and
measurement”; Prentice Hall PTR, 1998-Michigan
University; ISBN9780135343302.
[4] N. Ferrari, L. Greborio, F. Montalti, P. Regio, G.
Vespasiano, “OTDR
Characteristics for PON
Measurements”, Proceedings of the 57th International
Wire & Cable Symposium, November 9-12, 2008, Rhode
Island, USA, pag. 27-35.
[5] Mario Simard, “OTDR PON Ton Testing: the Challenges
- The Solution”, EXFO Application Note 201,
http://documents.exfo.com/appnotes/anote201-ang.pdf
[6]FTTH Council, “FTTH Council - Definition of Terms”,
available: ttp://www.ftthcouncil.org/UserFiles/File/FTTH
_definitions.pdf, 2006.
[7] D.R. Anderson, L. Johnson, and F.G. Bell, “Chapter 10:
Analyzing Passive Networks Containing Splitters and
Couplers”, Troubleshooting Optical Fiber Networks
Understanding and Using Optical Time-Domain
Reflectometers, California, US: Academic Press, Elsevier,
pp. 279-290, 2004.
[8] Yeh, Chien Hung, et al. "Reliable tree-type passive
optical networks with self-restorable apparatus." Optics
Express 16.7 (2008): 4494-4498.
[9] Bakar, A. A. A., et al. "A new technique of real-time
monitoring of fiber optic cable networks transmission."
Optics and Lasers in Engineering 45.1 (2007): 126-130.
[10] Triple-Play Service Deployment “A Comprehensive
Guide to Test, Measurement, and ServiceAssurance”,

“JDSU”,
http://www.ccm.ch/files/jdsu_tripleplaybook_oct20070
0.pdf
[11] Duwayne R. Anderson, Larry Johnson, Florian G.
Bell,“Troubleshooting Optical-Fiber Networks” –Printed
book –Elsevier - ISBN: 0-12-0586614
[12] Recommendation G.652 – (11/2009), Characteristics
of a single-mode optical fiber and cable:
http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.652-200911-I/en
[13] Chakraborty, U. K. (ed.) (2008). Advances in
Diﬀerential Evolution, Studies in Computational
Intelligence, Springer.
[14] Price, K. V., Storn, R. M. and Lampinen, J. A.
(2005).Diﬀerential Evolution: A Practical Approach to
Global Optimization, Natural Computing Series, Springer.
[15] Rocca, P.; Oliveri, G.; Massa, A. (2011). "Differential
Evolution as Applied to Electromagnetics". IEEE Antennas
and
Propagation
Magazine
53
(1):
38–49.
doi:10.1109/MAP.2011.5773566.
[16] Storn, Rainer, and Kenneth Price. "Differential
evolution–a simple and efficient heuristic for global
optimization over continuous spaces." Journal of global
optimization 11.4 (1997): 341-359.

[17] Kazovsky, Leonid G., "Phase- and polarizationdiversity coherent optical techniques," Lightwave
Technology, Journal of , vol.7, no.2, pp.279,292, Feb 1989
doi: 10.1109/50.17768
[18] MS Ab-Rahman, B Ng, K Jumari; ” Remotely Control,
Centralized Monitoring and Failure Analyzing in PON”;
IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and
Network Security, VOL.9 No.2, February 2009
[19]Boonchuan Ng, Mohammad Syuhaimi Ab-Rahman
and Kasmiran Jumari (2010). Graphical User Interface for
PON Network Management System, User Interfaces, Rita
Matrai (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-084-1, InTech.
[20] Hestenes, David. "Toward a modeling theory of
physics instruction."American journal of physics 55.5
(1987): 440-454.

[21] Roychoudhuri, Chandrasekhar. "The locality of the
superposition principle is dictated by detection
processes." Physics Essays 19.3 (2006): 333-354.
[22] Holbrow, C. H., E. Galvez, and M. E. Parks. "Photon
quantum mechanics and beam splitters." American
Journal of Physics 70 (2002): 260.

[23]Recommendation G.650.1, Definitions and test
methods for linear, deterministic attributes of singlemode fibre and cable. http://www.itu.int/rec/T-RECG.650.1-201007-I/en
[24] Pirich, Ronald, and John Mazurowski. "Engineering of
fiber optics infrastructure." Systems, Applications and
Technology Conference (LISAT), 2012 IEEE Long Island.
IEEE, 2012.
[25] Bahrampour, Ali Reza, and Fatemeh Maasoumi.
"Resolution enhancement in long pulse OTDR for
application in structural health monitoring." Optical Fiber
Technology 16.4 (2010): 240-249.
[26] N. Gagnon, A. Girard, and M. Leblanc,
"Considerations and Recommendations for In-Service
Out-of-Band Testing on Live FTTH Networks," in Optical
Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and The
National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, Technical
Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2006), paper
NWA3.
[27] Prasad, Sudhakar, Marlan O. Scully, and Werner
Martienssen. "A quantum description of the beam
splitter." Optics communications 62.3 (1987): 139-145.
[28] Roychoudhuri, Chandrasekhar. "Reality of
superposition principle and autocorrelation function for
short pulses." Proc. SPIE. Vol. 6108. 2006.

[29] The Fundamentals of an OTDR - EXFO
Available at: “http://www.exfo.com/glossary/opticaltime-domain-reflectometer-otdr
[30]LIMA,G.F.M.;LAMOUNIER,JR;CARDOSO.A;”Constrain
t-based Techniques to Support Electronic TV Network
Design” Lambert Academic Publisher, 2010.108p.
[31] LAMOUNIER JR, E.; “An Incremental Constraintbased Approach to Support
Engineering Design”, PhD
Thesis, School of Computer Studies, Leeds University, UK,
1996.
[32] Urban, P.J.; Vall-llosera, G.; Medeiros, E.; Dahlfort, S.,
"Fiber plant manager: an OTDR- and OTM-based PON
monitoring system," Communications Magazine, IEEE ,
vol.51,
no.2,
pp.S9,S15,
February
2013
doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2013.646118
[33] Satyan, Naresh (2011) Optoelectronic control of the
phase and frequency of semiconductor lasers.
Dissertation (Ph.D.), California Institute of Technology.

http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechTHESIS:04292011221312708
[34] LANGLEY, L. et al. Packaged semiconductor laser
optical phase-locked loop (opll) for photonic generation,
processing and transmission of microwave signals.
Microwave Theory and Techniques, IEEE Transactions on,
IEEE, v. 47, n. 7, p. 1257–1264, 1999.
[35] DEMTRODER, W.; TITTEL, F. K. Laser spectroscopy:
basic concepts and instrumentation. Optical Engineering,
International Society for Optics and Photonics,v. 35, n. 11,
p. 3361–3362, 1996.
[36] Cox, D.R., Hinkley, D.V. (1974) Theoretical Statistics,
Chapman & Hall (Appendix 3) ISBN 0-412-12420-3
FIGURE CAPTIONS:
Figure 1 – Proposed Methodology.
Figure2–Experimental
Network
Tested
(Splitter
configuration and branches).
Figure 3 – Law of Conservation focused on intensity.
Figure 4 – A heterodyne semiconductor laser optical
phase-locked loop (SATYAN, 2011)[33].
Figure 5 – Measured Signal (channel 1) x Signal Result
using the Equation in one channel.
Figure 6 - Measured Signal (channels 5, 6, 7, 8) x Signal
Result using the Equation in four channels
Figure 7- Measured Signal all channels x Signal Result
using the Equation in all channels.
Figure 8- OTDR signal simulation pulse parts.
Figure 9 - Chromosome representation.
Figure 10- Results with correlation of 0.95126 (Red) x
Measured Signal (Blue).
Figure 11- Signal Measured (blue) x Simulated Signal (Red)
Correlation above 0.97
Figure 12- Plots of the separated channel (blue),
simulated signal (green), measured signal (red).(3D)
Figure13– Constraints and FTTH PON Network.
Figure 14 - FTTH Design tool (GUI) and a FTTH design
sample.
Figure 15- FTTH real design coupled with the OTDR signal
(separated after the splitter).
Figure 16- Time response.
Figure17-Calibration Tool

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 4

Figure 2

Figure 5

Figure 3
Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 10

Figure 11

Figure 8

Figure 12

Figure 9

Figure 16

Figure 14

Figure 17

Figure 14

Figure 15

