21, rue d’Artois, F-75008 PARIS
http : //www.cigre.org

CIGRE US National Committee
2016 Grid of the Future Symposium

Optimal Design of Hybrid AC/DC Microgrids

H. LOTFI, A. KHODAEI
University of Denver
USA

S. BAHRAMIRAD
ComEd
USA

M. BOLLEN
Lulea Univ of Technology
Sweden

SUMMARY
DC loads (such as computers, data centres, electric vehicle chargers, and LED lamps) and dc
distributed energy resources (such as fuel cells, solar photovoltaics, and energy storages) are
rapidly growing in electric power systems, so dc systems are being introduced as emerging
practical investment solutions compared to traditional ac options. DC microgrids offer several
advantages such as the elimination of need for synchronizing generators and easier supply of
dc loads. Hybrid microgrids can benefit from the advantages of both ac and dc microgrid
types. Moreover, there would be a huge reduction in the number of required power converters
which would enhance the microgrid efficiency and reduce investment and operation costs.
This paper introduces hybrid ac/dc microgrid as a viable solution compared to individual ac or
dc microgrids and focuses on its planning. The objective of the hybrid microgrid planning is
to minimize the microgrid total cost, including investment cost of distributed energy resources
(DERs) and converters, operation cost of DERs, the cost of energy exchange with the utility
grid, and the cost of unserved energy during the planning horizon. The economic viability of
the microgrid planning is investigated in this paper and it is shown how the optimal DER
generation mix, the type of feeders, as well as the point of connection of DERs to feeders can
be determined by updating the traditional ac microgrid planning model. Numerical
simulations on a test microgrid exhibit the merits of the proposed model.

KEYWORDS
Microgrid, critical load, distributed energy resource, hybrid microgrid, planning.
Hossein.Lotfi@du.edu

1. INTRODUCTION
Microgrids have attracted significant attention throughout the world in recent years as viable
solutions in providing reliable, less expensive, high quality, and green electric energy.
Moreover, microgrids could potentially improve the energy efficiency and reduce network
congestion due to the proximity of generation and loads, thus benefiting both customers and
the system as a whole [1, 2]. The aforementioned advantages have stimulated a broad research
in various aspects of microgrids. Most prior studies have focused on microgrid operation,
control, and scheduling [2, 3], and research on microgrid planning is rather limited. Available
studies on microgrid planning investigate individual ac or dc microgrids. The study in [4]
provides a comprehensive review of ac and dc technologies in microgrids and investigates
various parameters as well as advantages and disadvantages of each technology. Several
advantages of dc technology over the ac are mentioned. On the other hand, it is stated that
most microgrids still use ac technology due to the need for more research on standardization
of dc systems in spite of more attention towards dc systems. It is also emphasized that hybrid
microgrids are more practical than individual dc microgrids. In [5], a model for energy
management and operational planning of microgrids with PV-based active generators is
presented, which includes a deterministic energy management system for microgrids
composed of PV units, energy storage system, and gas microturbines. The integration of the
proposed deterministic energy management method for business customers in the microgrid is
further discussed. The study in [6] investigates the optimal planning and design of a hybrid
microgrid which aims at minimizing the total planning cost by considering environmental
issues such as carbon emissions. In order to assess the economical and operational
performance of the proposed model, various DER mixes are compared.
Following the widespread use of dc loads, i.e., equipment with an internal DC bus, (such as
data centres, LED lighting, electric vehicle chargers, and other electronic devices) and dc
DERs, i.e., generation sources with an internal DC bus (such as solar PV and fuel cell), there
have been more attention towards dc microgrids. There are several advantages associated with
dc microgrids such as eliminating the need for synchronization of distributed generators,
easier integration of dc DERs, and easier supply of dc loads by eliminating multiple ac-dc-ac
converters. In reality, however, both ac and dc loads/DERs exist, and it is more economical to
have both ac and dc buses/lines which reduce the conversion costs to a high extent. Microgrid
planning is an important problem that requires the simultaneous consideration of short-term
operation and long-term investment problems, as well as the inclusion of several sources of
uncertainty, such as errors in load forecast, renewable generation, electricity market price, and
microgrid islanding. The microgrid planning problem is modelled in [7] by adopting robust
optimization, and a model for ac microgrid planning is proposed that uses Benders
decomposition method to decompose the planning problem into an investment master
problem and operation subproblem. Uncertainties in microgrid operation and planning are
also studied in [8] by proposing a preprocessing approach in lieu of robust optimization,
which leads to a significant reduction in computation time. The study in [3] investigates
individual ac or dc microgrid planning with the objective of determining the optimal
generation mix of DERs and the type of microgrid. Also, the threshold ratio of dc loads,
which makes dc microgrid a more economical solution compared to ac microgrid is found.
This paper is an extension to [3] by adding the capability for the microgrid to have both ac
and dc buses/feeders as a more practical solution. A number of feeders and various types of
distributed generations (DGs) are considered in this study. The objective is to minimize the
microgrid total planning cost. It also determines the optimal DER generation mix, the point of
1

connection of each DER to feeders, and the type of each feeder, i.e., either ac or dc, according
to the ratio of dc loads in feeders and the ratio of critical loads. The economic viability of the
proposed microgrid planning is examined by comparing the microgrid planning cost and the
cost of supplying all loads with the utility grid, i.e., without microgrid deployment.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 investigates the model outline and
problem formulation of hybrid microgrid planning; Section 3 provides numerical simulations
on a test microgrid; and Section 4 concludes the paper.
2. HYBRID MICROGRID PLANNING MODEL OUTLINE AND FORMULATION
A general structure of a hybrid ac/dc microgrid is represented in Figure 1. A hybrid microgrid
has several ac/dc feeders, but only one ac and one dc feeder are shown here. The ac DERs
(including wind turbine, microturbine, etc.) and ac loads can be connected to ac feeders via a
transformer (to convert the ac voltage to the desired level) or to dc feeders via a
rectifier/inverter. Although these units may use ac/dc/ac conversion and would be very
suitable for a dc collection grid, in this work they are considered as ac DERs, which however,
can be modelled and used as dc DERs in the proposed formulations without loss of generality.
Similarly, dc DERs (including fuel cell, solar PV, etc.) and dc loads can be connected to dc
feeders via dc-to-dc converters or to ac feeders via an inverter/rectifier. To minimize the total
cost in this configuration, ac components should be connected to ac feeders and dc
components to dc feeders. However, in order to increase the system reliability, the
components could be connected to both feeders at the same time as shown in the figure; so, if
there is any problem with one of them, the other one can still support the loads/DER. All dc
(ac) feeders should be connected to a common dc (ac) bus. The dc bus is to be connected to
the point of common coupling (PCC) via a bidirectional converter (it is bidirectional since the
exchanged power with the utility grid could be either positive, when importing power, or
negative, when exporting power). At the end, there is a need for a transformer to connect the
microgrid to the utility grid in order to have the desired voltage level.

Figure 1. General structure of a hybrid ac/dc microgrid

Generally, one of the advantages of microgrid deployment is the use of renewable energy
sources such as wind, solar, fuel cell, biomass, etc. Renewable DGs have been widely
considered by utilities and prosumers due to their decreasing costs, governmental policies to
reduce carbon emission, and rapid construction. Since renewable energy sources produce
variable generation due to weather conditions, they should be accompained by a distributed
energy storage (DES) to store their energy whenever they generate power and supply the
loads later during peak hours or microgrid islanding. The DES also improves the system
economics by storing energy in low-price hours and selling it back to the utility grid in highprice hours under net metering contacts which increases the microgrid revenue. Moreover,
there are critical loads in the microgrid that should be seamlessly supplied which necessitate a
2

number of dispatchable DGs. As a result, both dispatchable and renewable DGs are
considered in the microgrid planning. In the proposed model, it is assumed that a number of
feeders exist that their type, i.e., ac or dc, and the connection of DERs to feeders should be
determined by solving the microgrid planning problem.
The microgrid planning problem aims at minimizing the total planning cost which is
comprised of the investment cost of all components (including DERs and converters), the
operation cost of dispatchable DGs and energy exchange with the utility grid, as well as the
cost of unserved energy, or the reliability cost. The investment cost is calculated annually
while the operation and reliability costs are calculated hourly in the project lifetime. The
calculation of the operation and reliability costs can be found in the literature [3]. The
microgrid investment cost, however, is the term that is different from the existing literature
when a hybrid microgrid is to be deployed. The investment cost can be represented as in (1):
IC   C1,ikt xik  
t

k iG

t

 C2,ikt xik zk    C3,ikt xik (1  zk )   C4,kt zk   C5,kt (1  zk )

k iGac

t

k iGdc

t

k

t

(1)

k

The investment cost includes five terms as discussed below:
C1: The investment cost of DERs,
C2: The cost of rectifiers required for connecting ac DERs to dc feeders,
C3: The cost of inverters required for connecting dc DERs to ac feeders,
C4: The cost of inverters for connecting ac loads to dc feeders, and
C5: The cost of rectifiers for connecting dc loads to ac feeders.
Indices t, i, and k denote year, DERs, and feeders, respectively. G denotes the set of DERs. xik
is the binary decision variables associated with the connection of DER i to feeder k when it is
set to one. zk is another binary variable to determine the type of feeder k. The feeder is dc if zk
is set to one, and ac if set to zero. Using the proposed investment cost, when ac DERs are
selected to be installed, their associated investment cost will be added to the objective along
with a rectifier cost if connected to a dc feeder. Similarly, when dc DERs are selected to be
installed, their associated investment cost will be added to the objective along with an inverter
cost if connected to an ac feeder. This is also true for ac and dc loads, where proper
inverter/rectifier cost is added to the objective if they are connected to an opposite type
feeder. All of these different cases will be obtained based on different combinations of x and z
values as investment states.
The other constraint that needs to be revised in the microgrid planning problem is the load
balance, as proposed in (2):

 ( Pit  PM,kt )ηrec z k  (1  z k )   Pit z k  ηinv (1  z k )  Dt

iG ac

k , t

(2)

iG dc

The load balance constraint ensures that the sum of power from all DERs and the exchanged
power with the utility grid in all hours is equal to the total load in the microgrid. Pi and PM
represent the hourly power generated by DERs and the exchanged power with the utility grid,
respectively. PM can be either positive, when buying power from the grid, or negative, when
selling the excess power to the grid. The efficiency of rectifiers and inverters, as shown by ηrec
and ηinv, respectively, is considered in modelling this constraint as there will be losses due to
the application of converters. According to (2), the power generated by ac DERs located in dc
feeders is reduced by the coefficient ηrec, and the power generated by dc DGs located in ac
3

feeders is reduced by the coefficient ηinv. Again, the feeder type binary variable z is used to
impose proper terms of the constraints as the microgrid type is determined.
The microgrid planning problem is further subject to additional constraints, such as the
charging and discharging constraints of DES, maximum power exchange with the utility grid,
the technical constraints of dispatchable DGs, and the load adjustment and curtailment. These
constraints, however, can be found in the literature [3] and used along with the proposed
constraints to obtain the hybrid microgrid planning model.
3. NUMERICAL RESULTS
The proposed hybrid microgrid planning problem is applied to a test microgrid consisting of
four dispatchable units (gas-fired), one wind unit, one solar PV unit, and one DES as
represented in Table 1. The peak load is 8.5 MW. All load, solar, and wind generation, as well
as the hourly market price are obtained from the Illinois Institute of Technology Campus
microgrid in [3]. Three feeders are considered in this study and the planning horizon is
assumed to be 20 years. The problem is formulated by mixed-integer programming (MIP) and
solved by CPLEX 12.6. First, the ratio of dc loads and critical loads are considered to be 0.4
and 0.5, respectively. The ratios of dc (ac) loads to total dc (ac) loads in the microgrid in
feeders 1, 2, and 3 are assumed to be 0.39 (0.28), 0.33 (0.33), and 0.28 (0.39), respectively.

Unit
No.

Type

1,2

Gas

3,4

Gas

5
6

Wind
Solar PV

Table 1 DGs Characteristics
Annualized
Allowable
Investment Cost
Installation Capacity
($/MW)
(MW)
2
Totally
50,000
1.5
5
1.5
1
Totally
70,000
1
5
1
132,000
2
133,000
2

Cost
Coefficient
($/MWh)
85
95
105
65
70
75
0
0

The hybrid microgrid planning solution would install all DGs with capacity of 0.049 MW for
units 1 and 2, 2.376 MW for units 3 and 4, as well as 2 MW for wind and solar PV units. All
feeders would be ac. The investment, operation, and total planning costs are $8,379,934,
$2,737,252, and $11,117,190, respectively. Since the microgrid planning cost is less than the
cost of supplying loads witout microgrid deployment ($14,548,920), the microgrid installation
is economically viable. The sensitivity analysis with respect to the ratio of dc loads shows that
by increasing this ratio up to 0.6, all feeders are ac. The increase in this ratio up to 0.8 would
cause feeders 1 and 2 to be dc, and increasing to 0.9 and 1 will select all feeders to be dc. The
microgrid costs are shown in Figure 2. By increasing this ratio to 0.8, the total dispatchable
capacity and their hourly power generation increase, so the investment and operation costs
increase as well. Having all loads as dc (associated with dc load ratio=1) causes the
investment cost to decrease due to the elimination of the converters’ costs. Moreover, the
power loss reduction leads to less power from DGs, so the operation cost drops. Therefore,
the planning cost would be an ascending curve first, and a descending one afterwards. By
increasing the ratio of critical loads, the capacity of dispatchable DGs would increase, which
causes the microgrid investment and planning costs to increase as well. Changing the
electricity market prices from -10% to +20% also increases the total capacity of dispatchable
4

units since the microgrid would sell more energy to the utility grid, which increases its
revenue. As a result, the investment cost increases while the operation cost decreases by
increasing the market price, as shown in Figure 3. The planning results show that solar and
wind units are installed with their maximum capacity in all cases, conceivably due to their
zero operation cost. Moreover, ac DERs are installed in ac feeders and dc DERs in dc feeders
in order to avoid the conversion costs.

Figure 2. Microgrid costs with respect to ratio of dc loads to total load

Figure 3. Microgrid costs with respect to market prices

4. CONCLUSION
In this paper, hybrid ac/dc microgrids’ advantages, their role in improving system efficiency,
and their various components were explained and a model for hybrid microgrid planning was
presented with the objective of minimizing the total planning cost. The optimal size of DERs,
their point of connection to feeders, and the feeders’ type were determined as the output of the
hybrid microgrid planning solution. The numerical simulations on a test microgrid
demonstrated that the only factor in determining the type of feeders, i.e., either ac or dc,
would be the ratio of dc loads. It was verified that increasing the ratio of critical loads would
install a larger capacity of dispatchable units in order to seamlessly supply critical loads,
which increases the investment, and hence, the planning costs. It was further shown that by
increasing market prices, it would be more desirable for the microgrid to sell as much power
as possible to the utility grid which requires installing more DG capacities, thus increasing the
investment cost but decreasing the operation cost. One issue that needs more investigation is
that many devices use a variable dc voltage and also often a number of different dc voltages
internally. For example, a PV uses the dc voltage for the maximum power point tracking.
When connecting directly to a dc grid, the voltage is no longer under control and the
efficiency will be lower. Although this doesn’t change the proposed methodology, but the
conclusions may be different as even for dc devices like PV an additional dc/dc converter
would be needed.
5

BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1]

[2]
[3]
[4]

[5]

[6]
[7]

[8]

M. Shahidehpour and J. Clair, “A functional microgrid for enhancing reliability,
sustainability, and energy efficiency” (Electricity Journal, vol. 25, no. 8, Oct. 2012, pp.
21-28)
S. Parhizi, H. Lotfi, A. Khodaei, and S. Bahramirad, “State of the art in research on
microgrids: A review” (IEEE Access, vol. 3, Jul. 2015, pp. 890-925)
H. Lotfi and A. Khodaei, “AC versus DC microgrid planning,” (IEEE Transactions on
Smart Grid, In press, 2016)
E. Planas, J. Andreu, J. I. Gárate, I. M. Alegría, and E. Ibarra, “AC and DC technology
in microgrids: A review” (Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 43, Mar.
2015, pp. 726-749)
H. Kanchev, D. Lu, F. Colas, V. Lazarov, and B. Francois, “Energy management and
operational planning of a microgrid with a PV-based active generator for smart grid
applications” (IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 58, no. 10, Oct. 2011,
pp. 4583-4592)
O. Hafez and K. Bhattacharya, “Optimal planning and design of a renewable energy
based supply system for microgrids” (Renewable Energy, Vol. 45, Sep. 2012, pp. 7-15)
A. Khodaei, S. Bahramirad, and M. Shahidehpour, “Microgrid Planning Under
Uncertainty” (IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 30, no. 5, Sep. 2015, pp. 24172425)
H. Lotfi and A. Khodaei, “An Efficient Preprocessing Approach for Uncertainty
Consideration in Microgrids” (IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference,
Dallas, TX, 2016)

6

