A Hybrid Approach for Secured Optimal Power Flow and
Voltage Stability with TCSC Placement
Sheila Mahapatra1, Nitin Malik2
1,2

The NORTHCAP University, Gurgaon-07, Haryana, India.

mahapatrasheila@gmail.com, nitinmalik@ncuindia.edu

Abstract
This paper proposes a hybrid technique for secured optimal power flow coupled with enhancing
voltage stability with FACTS device installation. The hybrid approach of Improved Gravitational
Search algorithm (IGSA) and Firefly algorithm (FA) performance is analyzed by optimally placing
TCSC controller. The algorithm is implemented in MATLAB working platform and the power flow
security and voltage stability is evaluated with IEEE 30 bus transmission systems. The optimal results
generated are compared with those available in literature and the superior performance of algorithm
is depicted as minimum generation cost, reduced real power losses along with sustaining voltage
stability.

Keywords: TCSC, optimal location, voltage stability, improved Gravitational Search
Algorithm and firefly algorithm

1. Introduction
Optimal Power Flow (OPF) was conceptualized by Carpentier in 1962 and is instrumental to obtain
reduced generation cost integrated with power flow solution taking into consideration the system
constraints. The conventional approach presented in literature includes lambda iteration method,
Newton method, gradient method, linear programming, interior point algorithm all of which are
incompatible to execute the requirements of modern deregulated highly interconnected power system
structure. Most of these techniques suffer from slow convergence and may not generate global
optimum. Numerous heuristic algorithms have been developed recently and have been implemented
to successfully generate OPF solution. In this regards Genetic Algorithm (GA) [1], Artificial Bee
Evolutionary Programming (EP) [3] and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [2] have been
effectively used with and without incorporating FACTS devices.

FACTS devices have immense application in various areas of power system and are extensively
being used to reduce power flows in heavily loaded lines, improved transient stability, reactive power
compensation and in enhancing system security. Thyristor Controlled Series Compensator (TCSC)
has emerged as the most versatile FACTS device widely implemented for series compensation.
D. Mondal et al. [4] proficiently proposed the PSO for selecting the optimal location and setting the
parameters of SVC (Static Var Compensator) and TCSC (Thyristor Controlled Series Compensator)
controllers. An earnest endeavour was also made to analyse and contrast the performance of the
TCSC controller with that of the SVC with the intent to resolve the trivial signal stability menace. The
replications were carried out in a multi machine system for two universal contingencies such as the
load increase and transmission line outage to illustrate the relevance of their dream scheme.
The work proposed in this paper is a novel approach of improved gravitational Search Algorithm with
Firefly Technique (IGSA-FA) to generate secured OPF solution along with ensuring voltage stability
under normal condition and at the event of overloading or contingency.
The rest of the paper is designed as follows: Section 2 provides the problem formulation and the
detailed computational method is described in section 3. Results and discussions are provided in
section 4 and the work is concluded in section 5.

2. Problem Formulation
The problem formulation is designed to incorporate the dual objective of fuel cost minimization and
voltage stability enhancement under variable loading conditions. The work involves modeling of
TCSC controller as a variable series reactance which provides scope for changing the transfer
reactance of transmission lines thereby modifying the power flow.
The quadratic equation of fuel cost is furnished by Equation 1 give below.





Fuel cost, Fc   ai  bi Pgi  ci Pgi2 $ / hr

(1)

Where, Fc represents the aggregate fuel cost, a i , bi and ci signify the fuel cost coefficients, Pgi
symbolizes the active power produced by i th generator. The equality and inequality constraints are
employed for the investigation of the safety optimal power flow with the TCSC. In the document, the
apparent power balancing conditions are deemed as the equality constraints. And the generator real
power, the voltage magnitude and the reactance of the TCSC are taken as the inequality constraints. A
concise account of these constraints is furnished below.
The real and reactive power balancing condition is expressed by means of Equation 2 and Equation 3
respectively as shown below.

Pinj, i  Pg , i  P L, i

(2)

The reactive power balancing condition is estimated by the following Equation 3.

Qinj, i  Qg , i Q L, i

(3)

The security constraints representing the active power bounds of the i th generators are represented by
Equation 4 shown below.
max
Pgmin
, i  Pg i  Pg , i

(4)

By means of the following Equation 5, the voltage magnitude of the i th buses is estimated.

Vi min  Vi  Vi max

(5)

The reactance bounds of the TCSC are expressed by Equation 6 and are considered to prevent
overcompensation.

 0.7 X line  X TCSC  0.2 X line

(6)

Where, Pinj, i represents the real power infused into bus i , Pg , i depicts the real power produced by the

i th generator, PL , i characterizes the real power of the i th load bus. Identically, Qinj, i represents the
reactive power infused into bus i , Q g , i corresponds to the reactive power produced by the
max
i th generator and QL , i signifies the reactive power of the i th load bus. Now, Pgmin
, i and Pg ,i indicate

the lowest and highest power generation bounds of the i th generator, Vi min and Vi max represent the
lowest and highest voltage magnitude bounds of the i th bus, and X line and X TCSC characterize the line
and TCSC reactance respectively.
The chief idea of the objective function is invested in deciding the optimal option of TCSC
subject to the optimal power flow factors and security constraints. This is accomplished by a new
index called as power flow index (PFI) and is calculated based on the load factor variation. The
maximum PFI value is used to fix the optimal TCSC placement. Then, the TCSC capacity is
evaluated according to voltage variance which aims at minimizing voltage deviation at bus voltage.
So, the constrained optimization problem results in a combination of minimization and maximization
function such that the objective function can be reframed as follows:

max  API 
Ob  
min Vd , Ct csc 

(7)

The input to the proposed methodology includes the parameters furnished by Equation 7 which results
in TCSC best parameter and location to be selected. The detailed explanation of the proposed
technique is explained in the following section.

3. Proposed Methodology
In this section, the optimal location and TCSC capacity evaluation to improve voltage stability based
on a hybrid technique is presented. The hybrid technique is the combination of the improved GSA
(IGSA) and firefly algorithm (FA). The implementation is carried in two basis stages where first one
involves finding the optimal TCSC location and the second is determination of injected capacity of
TCSC respectively. These two phases are solved by using the IGSA and FA. The robustness of
proposed algorithm is verified by overloading the transmission line. Subsequently, the injection
capacity of the TCSC is calculated by equations (5) and (6) through the security constraints using the
FF algorithm. Initially, normal power flow calculation is obtained to verify system stability and
effectiveness of the computational method is tested on IEEE standard bench mark 30 bus system.
Afterwards the loading faults are introduced in the bus system. Here, the maximum API bus is
determined by the IGSA technique, and is identified as the most favourable location for fixing the
TCSC. Depending on the affected parameters, the finest capacity of the TCSC is identified using the
firefly algorithm. It is used to recover the normal operating condition and enhance the dynamic
stability. The overall working process of the proposed technique is illustrated in figure1.
Firefly algorithm has evolved as a most novel meta-heuristic search algorithm and has the striking
merit of fundamentally employing only real random numbers, and is dependent on the global
communication among the swarming particles [5]. All fireflies are unisex in order that a firefly gets
attracted to others regardless of their sex and attractiveness is sensed proportional to their brightness
which reflects fitness evaluation. As the attractiveness is directly proportional to the brightness, both
these qualities tend to decline as their distance goes on increasing [6]. In the document, the firefly
technique is elegantly employed to cut short the voltage variance and thereby increase the ability of
the TCSC for preserving the voltage consistency of the transmission system. The variance in the
normal voltage ( Vn ) and the fault time (Vi) is effectively estimated.Here, the light intensity (I) is
estimated, which is linked to the fitness function, which is deemed as the minimization of the voltage
divergence between usual bus voltage and fault time bus voltage. The fitness function is estimated by
the equations illustrated below.

I  F  X i   minVd 

(8)

Where, Vd  Vn  Vi i 1

(9)

N

From the initial fitness value, choose the least minimum fitness and choose the quality of best
solutions.

Initialization
Calculation:
Mass of agents are
evaluated
Evaluation:
Fitness is evaluated

No

Max
Yes

Computation:
Gravitational constants are
computed
Estimation:
Force of the agents is estimated

Determination:
Acceleration of agents are
calculated

Updation:
The Position & their
velocities are updated

End

Figure 1: Working process of IGSA

3. Results and Discussions
In the work proposed, hybrid technique of IGSA-FA is launched for improving the voltage stability of
the transmission system with TCSC. The overload of the transmission line is reduced after placing
TCSC on the precise location. The line flow limit is employed to verify the violation of line limits
after resolving the issue which exhibits the security limits. Further, the voltage deviation of the system
is estimated. The proposed technique is applied to the IEEE standard bench mark 30 bus system. The
bus data, line data and the limits of control variables are estimated from [7]. The fuel cost coefficient
of IEEE 30 bus system are referred from [5]. The Newton Raphson power flow method is effectively
employed to calculate the power flow solution before and after setting TCSC. The proposed method
outcomes are assessed and contrasted with those of the RBFNN based GSA and Fuzzy based GSA
techniques.

Table 1: TCSC Optimal Location and Cost Evaluation for OPF solution
S.No

1

2

Loading

TCSC installed between 11

Condition

and 13 buses

Prior to Loading
283.4
283.4
Subsequent to
Loading without
293.9
TCSC
Total Real Power loss in MW
Prior to Loading

3

2.6351
Subsequent to
Loading without
8.641
TCSC
Total active power generation cost ($/hr)
Prior to Loading

4

6.8095

Subsequent to
Loading without
TCSC
TCSC Cost
($/MVAR)

828.3393

795.675

810.2864
138.4178

Figure 2: Performance analysis of Voltage profile with proposed method
From the voltage profile analysis, we find that the voltage profile at each bus collapses at the
load unbalanced condition, but at the same time the proposed method is used to enhance the
voltage profile to be stable. It is clear that the proposed method contains the reduced power loss
during the fault conditions. Finally, it is concluded that, the proposed system effectively identifies the
optimum location and the optimum capacity of the IGSA and the FA technique, which proves the
superiority of the proposed method.

Conclusions
In this paper, hybrid stochastic method of IGSA-FA is proposed to improve system performance by
realizing OPF solution and voltage stability with TCSC optimal placement and optimized cost and
parameters. The results are verified and compared with various other computational method
implemented for OPF formulation as available in literature. It candidly establishes the superior
performance of algorithm as it requires less execution time to generate minimum generation cost and
reduced real power losses which make it a suitable method for solving OPF problem and can be also
extended to include voltage stability limits to conventional OPF issues.

References
[1] R.N. Banu and D. Devaraj, “Optimal Power Flow for Steady State Security Enhancement Using
Genetic Algorithm with FACTS Devices”, 3rd International Conference on Industrial and
Information Systems, pp. 1 – 6, 8-10 December 2008.

[2] L.L. Lai and J.T. Ma, “Power Flow Control in FACTS Using Evolutionary Programming”, IEEE
International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 10, 29 November-1 December 1995.
[3] C. Gonggui and Y. Junjjie, “A new particle Swarm Optimization Solution to Optimal Reactive
Power Flow Problem”, Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, pp.1 – 4, 27-31
March 2009.
[4] D. Mondal, A. Chakrabarti and A. Sengupta, “Optimal placement and parameter setting of SVC
and TCSC using PSO to mitigate small signal stability problem”, International Journal of
Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 334–340, November 2012.

[5] Naresh Acharya, and N. Mithulananthan, "Locating series FACTS devices for congestion
management in deregulated electricity markets", Electric Power Systems Research,
Vol.77, pp.352–360, 2007
[6] R.Subramanian and K.Thanushkodi, “An Efficient Firefly Algorithm to Solve Economic
Dispatch Problems”, International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE),
Volume-2, Issue-1, March 2013
[7]IEEE-30
bus
transmission
system
data
is
http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/pf30/ieee30cdf.txt

refereed

from:

[8] Rengin Idil Cabadag, Belgin Emre Turkay, “Heuristic methods to solve optimal power
flow Problem” IU-JEEE, Vol. 13, No2, pp 1653-1659, 2013.
[9] Bhattacharya A, Chattopadhyay PK., “Application of biogeography-based optimization to
solve different optimal power flow problems. IET Generation Transmission Distribution,
5(1), pp.70–80, 2011.
[10] Yuryevich J.and Po Wong J. K., “Evolutionary programming based optimal power flow
algorithm”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol 4, no14, pp. 1245–1250, 1999
[11] Ben Attous D. and Labbi Y., “Particle swarm optimization based optimal power flow for
units with non-smooth fuel cost functions”, Proceedings of the 6th International
Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ELECO ’09), pp. 5–8, 2009.
[12] B. Allaoua and A. Laoufi, “Optimal power flow solution using ant manners for electrical
network”, Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol1, no9, pp. 34–40, 2009.
[13] Luong Le Dinh, Dieu Vo Ngoc and Pandian Vasant, “Artificial Bee Colony algorithm
for solving Optimal Power Flow Problem”, The Scientific World Journal, 2013, (2013).

