1

Secure Directional Modulation to Enhance Physical
Layer Security in IoT Networks

arXiv:1712.02104v2 [cs.IT] 25 Jan 2018

Feng Shu, Siming Wan, Shihao Yan, Qian Wang, Yongpeng Wu, Riqing Chen, Jun Li, and Jinhui Lu

Abstract—In this work, an adaptive and robust null-space
projection (AR-NSP) scheme is proposed for secure transmission
with artificial noise (AN)-aided directional modulation (DM) in
wireless networks. The proposed scheme is carried out in three
steps. Firstly, the directions of arrival (DOAs) of the signals
from the desired user and eavesdropper are estimated by the
Root Multiple Signal Classificaiton (Root-MUSIC) algorithm and
the related signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) are estimated based
on the ratio of the corresponding eigenvalue to the minimum
eigenvalue of the covariance matrix of the received signals. In
the second step, the value intervals of DOA estimation errors
are predicted based on the DOA and SNR estimations. Finally,
a robust NSP beamforming DM system is designed according to
the afore-obtained estimations and predictions. Our examination
shows that the proposed scheme can significantly outperform the
conventional non-adaptive robust scheme and non-robust NSP
scheme in terms of achieving a much lower bit error rate (BER)
at the desired user and a much higher secrecy rate (SR). In
addition, the BER and SR performance gains achieved by the
proposed scheme relative to other schemes increase with the value
range of DOA estimation error.
Index Terms—Physical layer security, privacy and security,
internet of things (IoT), artificial noise, directional modulation.

I. I NTRODUCTION
Due to the broadcast nature of wireless mediums, private
information is vulnerable to be intercepted by unintended
users, which causes ever-increasing concerns on the security
of wireless networks. As such, transmission, storage, processing, and protection of confidential information in wireless
networks are of growing research interests [1]–[4]. Against
this background,, there is an increasing demand for designing
secure transmissions to protect the legitimate users against
being overheard [5]–[18]. In [5], Wyner conducted pioneering
research on a discrete memoryless wiretap channel for secure
communication in the presence of an eavesdropper and proposed the notion of secrecy capacity. Different from the conventional cryptographic technologies, of which the achieved
Feng Shu, Siming Wan, Jun Li, and Jinhui Lu are with School of Electronic
and Optical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China (emails: {shufeng, wsm, jun.li, jinhui.lu}@njust.edu.cn).
Feng Shu and Riqing Chen are also with the College of Computer and Information Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002,
China, and the College of Physics and Information, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou
350116, China (email: chenriqing1980@163.com).
Shihao Yan is with the Research School of Engineering, The Australian
National University, Canberra, Australia (email: shihao.yan@anu.edu.au).
Qian Wang is with the School of Computer Science, Wuhan University,
Wuhan, China (email: qianwang@whu.edu.cn).
Yongpeng Wu is with the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Navigation and
Location-Based Services, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Minhang 200240,
China (email: yongpeng.wu2016@gmail.com).

security is based on the high computational complexity, physical layer security (PLS) can be utilized to provide an everlasting information-theoretic security. In addition, PLS does
not require cryptographic keys in order to achieve secrecy,
which eliminate the complicated key distributions and managements. Consequently, it is essential to take advantage of PLS
to defend unintended user against eavesdropping confidential
information in the upcoming fifth generation (5G) and beyond
wireless networks [8].
A secure transmission scheme was proposed, using the basic
idea of original symbol phase rotated (OSPR) in [9], to randomly rotate the phase of original symbols at base station (BS)
before they are transmitted, so that the legitimate receivers
were able to successfully recover original symbols by taking
proper inverse operation while the illegitimate users could not
detect most of original symbols. Artificial noise (AN)-aided
security transmission was employed in [10]–[14] to disrupt
the unauthorized users from tapping the confidential messages.
In [10], provided that the channel state information (CSI)
was publicly and perfectly known, the transmitter produced
AN to guarantee secure communication in two scenarios,
the transmitter equipped with multiple antennas and multiplecooperative-relays-aided secure transmission. Cooperative relays and symbol-level precoding were respectively considered
in [15]–[17] and [18] to enhance PLS and prevent eavesdropping attacks in wireless networks. Moreover, security and
privacy is critical in the field of internet of things (IoT),
and PLS plays a key role in IoT networks [19]–[23]. The
author in [20] summarized the low-complexity PLS schemes
for IoT and presented some new research topics in the context
of future IoT. In [21], randomize-and-forward relay strategy
was leveraged for secure relay communication without the
knowledge of number and locations of eavesdroppers in IoT.
And all devices equipped with single antenna and multiple
antennas were analyzed, respectively. To enhance the PLS,
the authors in [22] investigated secure downlink transmission
with the help of cooperative jamming in the IoT networks.
Additionally, wireless physical layer identification (WPLI)
system was proposed in [23] to increase the user capacity by
assigning multiple devices to one user in IoT networks.
Directional modulation (DM), as a critical secure wireless
technique, attracts tremendous research interests from both
academia and industry and plays an increasingly important
role in the context of PLS of wireless communications and
networks. An orthogonal vector approach, using the concept
of null-space projection (NSP), was proposed in [24] to
allow analysis and synthesis of DM transmitter arrays. In
[25], an AN-aided zero-forcing method was proposed, which

2

was intimately related to the concept of pseudo-inverse of
matrix, where the dynamic characteristic of DM was achieved
by randomly changing the AN vector at the symbol-level
rate. However, it was assumed that the perfect knowledge of
the desired direction was available. Additionally, maximizing
the so-called signal-to-leakage-and-noise ratio (SLNR) for all
users simultaneously to design precoders was proposed in
[26], [27]. In [28]–[30], the direction angle estimation error
was taken into account and a robust method of designing the
beamforming vector of confidential information and projection
matrix of AN was presented. The authors of [28] derived
a closed-form expression for the null space of conjugate
transpose of the steering vector in the desired direction and
proposed a robust DM synthesis method based on conditional
minimum mean square error (MMSE) criterion. In [29], the
authors extended the idea in [28] to the broadcasting scenario, where the conditional leakage beamforming scheme
was presented. In [30], without the knowledge of direction
measurement error, a blind robust secure leakage method of
using main-lobe-integration was constructed for multi-user
multiple input multiple output (MIMO) scenario. Furthermore,
the authors extended the application of DM to a multi-cast
scenario in [31]. In this work, two methods, maximum group
receive power plus null-space projection scheme and MaxSLNR plus maximum-AN-leakage-and-noise ratio scheme,
were proposed to enhance PLS and improve the secrecy sumrate compared with block diagonalization using the same order
low computational complexity.
All the aforementioned research works on DM only focus
on how to design beamforming schemes with perfect information of the direction angle or imperfect such information
but with given error distributions. We note that it is hard,
if not impossible, to adapt the DM techniques proposed in
the aforementioned works as per different channel conditions,
such as the varying signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Actually, in
all the robust DM beamforming schemes, the first step is to
estimate the direction-of-arrival (DOA) together with the SNR
and predict the value range of DOA estimation error at DM
transmitter, which is mandatory in a practical DM network.
However, this step is overlooked in the context of designing
robust synthesis methods of DM in the literature. In addition,
due to the randomness of wireless channels, the transmitter
may have to estimate the DOA and SNR periodically. To
address the estimation problem in DM networks, in this work
we propose an adaptive and robust NSP (AR-NSP) method,
which consists of three steps. Firstly, the DOAs are measured
by Root Multiple Signal Classificaiton (Root-MUSIC) rule
and the corresponding SNRs are estimated. Then the value
ranges of the DOA estimation error are predicted. In the
last step, a robust NSP scheme is proposed to design the
beamforming vector of confidential information and the AN
projection vector without the statistical knowledge of channel
noise. Our main contributions are summarized as below.
1) Based on the singular value decomposition (SVD) of the
covariance matrix of the receive signals achieved by the
Root-MUSIC method, we first estimate the receive SNRs
for the desired and eavesdropping users. These estimated

SNRs are further utilized to predict the value intervals
of DOA estimation errors with the aid of the CramerRao lower bound (CRLB) expression of unbiased DOA
estimators.
2) As per the predicted value intervals of DOA estimation
errors, we propose an AR-NSP scheme for DM, aiming
to enhance the secure transmission of confidential information. The proposed method can adapt its beamforming
vector of the confidential information and the projection
vector of AN according to the quality of wireless channels. Our examine shows that the proposed method can
achieve noticeable performance gains relative to the nonadaptive robust conditional MMSE method presented in
[28] and the non-robust NSP method proposed in [24]
in terms of achieving a much lower bit error rate (BER)
and a significantly higher security rate (SR).
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section
II presents the DM system model. In Section III, DOA and
SNR are first estimated and then the value intervals of DOA
estimation errors are predicted. In addition, our proposed
AR-NSP scheme is detailed in this section. Simulation and
numerical results are presented in Section IV. Finally, we draw
our conclusions in Section V.
Notations: Throughout the paper, matrices, vectors, and
scalars are denoted by letters of bold upper case, bold lower
case, and lower case, respectively. Signs (·)T , (·)H , and k · k
represent transpose, conjugate transpose, and norm, respectively. The notation E{·} denotes the expectation operation.
IN denotes the N × N identity matrix.
II. S YSTEM M ODEL
The system model of interest is shown in Fig. 1, where
Alice is a transceiver equipped with an N -antenna array, while
each of Bob and Eve is equipped with a single antenna. The
secure transmission in the considered system model incurs in
two consecutive time slots. In the first time slot, Bob and
Eve transmit signals, while Alice receives their signals. Alice
measures Bob’s and Eve’s directions and predicts their value
intervals of the direction measurement errors. In the second
time slot, Alice uses the predicted directions and error value
intervals to design the AR-NSP scheme. Subsequently, Alice
transmits the confidential information to Bob using the ARNSP scheme in order to prevent Eve from eavesdropping the
confidential information successfully.

A. System Model in the First Time Slot
In the first time slot, Bob and Eve are the transmitters,
while Alice is the receiver. In fact, Bob transmits useful
signals to Alice, while Eve is an active attacker who would
like to intercept the communications between Alice and Bob.
By receiving the transmitted signals from Bob and Eve,
Alice can measure their directions. Bob and Eve send the
passband signals sb (t)ej2πfb t and se (t)ej2πfe t , respectively,
where sb (t), and se (t) represent their corresponding baseband
signals, and fb and fe are carrier frequencies, respectively.

3

B. System Model in the Second Time Slot
(YH

Given that Alice has estimated the direction angles of Bob
and Eve in the first time slot, she transmits its confidential
messages by the precoding vector vb towards Bob, and prevents Eve from intercepting Alice’s confidential messages by
using AN projection vector we in the second time slot. The
transmit signal of Alice is given by
p
p
sm = β1 Ps vb xm + β2 Ps we zm ,
(5)

%RE

D Tb

D Te

Ă

where Ps is the total transmission power of Alice, β1 and
β2 are the power allocation (PA) coefficients of confidential
messages and AN with β12 + β22 = 1, respectively, vb ∈
CN ×1 denotes the transmitting beamforming vector of useful
signals for forcing the confidential messages to the desired
direction and we ∈ CN ×1 is the AN projection vector of
leading AN to the
 undesired direction, xm is the confidential
message with E xH
m xm = 1, and zm denotes
 Hthe scalar AN
varying from one symbol to another with E zm
zm = 1.
We suppose that sm passes through the line-of-sight (LOS)
channel and then the receive signal at direction θ is given by

$OLFH
)LUVWWLPHVORW
(a) System model of the first time slot

(YH

%RE

y(θ) = hH (θ)sm + nr
p
p
= β1 Ps hH (θ)vb xm + β2 Ps hH (θ)we zm + nr ,
(6)

K Tb

K Te

Ă
$OLFH
6HFRQGWLPHVORW
(b) System model of the second time slot
Fig. 1. System model of adaptive and robust directional modulation.

With the narrow-band assumption, the receive signal at Alice
can be expressed as
r(t) = sb (t)a(θb ) + se (t)a(θe ) + n(t),

(1)

where a(θb ) and a(θe ) are the array manifolds for Bob and
Eve defined by
iT
h
j 2π (N −1)d sin(θb )
j 2π d sin(θb )
,
(2)
, · · · , e λb
a(θb ) = 1, e λb
and

where θ is the direction angle between transmitter and receiver and θ ∈ [−π/2, π/2], nr is additive white Gaussian
noise (AWGN) of obeying the complex Gaussian distribution
CN (0, σr2 ), h(θ) ∈ CN ×1 is the array manifold given by
iT
1 h j2πΨθ (1)
e
, · · · , ej2πΨθ (n) , · · · , ej2πΨθ (N )
h(θ) = √
N
(7)
and the phase function Ψθ (n) along direction θ can be written
as
(n − (N + 1)/2)d cos θ
Ψθ (n) , −
, n = 1, 2, · · · N. (8)
λ
As such, the receive signals at Bob and Eve can be expressed
as
y(θb ) = hH (θb )sm + nb
p
p
= β1 Ps hH (θb )vb xm + β2 Ps hH (θb )we zm + nb ,
(9)
and

iT
h
2π
2π
a(θe ) = 1, ej λe d sin(θe ) , · · · , ej λe (N −1)d sin(θe ) ,

(3)

respectively, and d denotes the spacing between two adjacent
elements, while λb = c/fb and λe = c/fe are the wavelengths
of the transmit signal carriers from Bob and Eve, respectively.
After down-conversion and A/D operations, the resultant
sampled receive baseband signal can be represented as
r[k] = sb [k]a(θb ) + se [k]a(θe ) + n[k], k = 1, 2, · · · Ns , (4)
where Ns is the number of snapshots, Pb = E{| sb [k] |2 }
and Pe = E{| se [k] |2 } are the transmit powers of Bob and
Eve, and n[k] is the receiving noise vector with distribution
CN (0, σ̂ 2 IN ).

y(θe ) = hH (θe )sm + ne
p
p
= β1 Ps hH (θe )vb xm + β2 Ps hH (θe )we zm + ne ,
(10)
respectively, where nb ∼ CN (0, σb2 ) and ne ∼ CN (0, σe2 )
represent the AWGN at Bob and Eve, respectively. Without
loss of generality, we assume that σr2 = σb2 = σe2 = σ 2 .
Following (9) and (10), we have the achievable rates at Bob
and Eve as
R(θb ) , I(y(θb ); [x, θb ])


β12 Ps hH (θb )vb vbH h(θb )
(11)
= log2 1 + 2
σb + β22 Ps hH (θb )we weH h(θb )

4

and
R(θe ) , I(y(θe ); [x, θe ])


β12 Ps hH (θe )vb vbH h(θe )
, (12)
= log2 1 + 2
σe + β22 Ps hH (θe )we weH h(θe )
which yield the achievable secrecy rate Rs as
Rs = max {0, R(θb ) − R(θe )} .
III. P ROPOSED A DAPTIVE

AND

(13)

ROBUST NSP S CHEME

In this section, we present the proposed AR-NSP scheme
to design the beamforming vector vb and projection vector
we . Firstly, the direction angles, including the directions of
desired user and eavesdropper, and the corresponding SNRs
are estimated using the Root-MUSIC algorithm. Subsequently,
based on the estimated angles and SNRs, the value intervals
of the DOA estimation errors are predicted with the aid of
CRLB. Finally, the AR-NSP scheme is constructed to enhance
the secrecy performance of the considered DM system.

subspace EN , and the associated eigenvalues in descending
order, i.e,
µ1 > µ2 > · · · > µM+1 > · · · > µN ,

where M = 2 is the number of incoming signals. Then the
noise variance is given by
µM+1 + · · · + µN
,
(20)
σ̂ 2 =
N −M
which yields the SNR estimated value for emission source m
as
µm − σ̂ 2
γ̂m =
,
(21)
N σ̂ 2
which can be used to predict the intervals of the DOA
estimation errors. From the definition of CRLB, we have the
variance of direction angle error is lower bounded by [33]
σθ2m ≥ CRLBm ≈
where
L=

A. DOA and SNR Estimations with Error Range Prediction
In the first time slot, by collecting the receive vector r[k]
of Ns snapshots for ∀k ∈ {1, 2, · · · , Ns }, the covariance
matrix of r[k] in (4) is given by
Ryy =
=

Ns
1 X
r[k]rH [k]
Ns

1
Ns

1
+
Ns

k=1
Ns
X

k=1
Ns
X

{Pb a(θb )aH (θb ) + Pe a(θe )aH (θe )}
2

σ̂ IN .

k=1

As per the SVD operation, Ryy can be reformulated as follows
Ryy = UΛUH + σ̂ 2 IN

(16)

Referring to the Root-MUSIC in [32], the estimated value
of direction angle θ̂m can be computed as per the following
expression


arg(zm )
θ̂m = arcsin
, m ∈ {1, 2},
(17)
ld
where

2π
,
(18)
λ
and m = 1 means θ1 = θb , i.e., the desired direction, m = 2
means that θ2 = θe , the eavesdropper direction, and zm are the
two roots of the polynomial of the Root-MUSIC in [32], which
are the two solutions closet to the unit circle inside the unit
circle. By performing the SVD operation on the covariance
matrix Ryy , we can obtain the signal subspace ES , the noise
l=

8π 2 Ns γ̂m cos2 θ̂m L
N
X

d2n ,

,

(22)

(23)

n=1

and

N +1
)d, n = 1, 2, · · · N.
(24)
2
Since we can get the lower bound of standard deviation σθm ,
the approximated value interval of DOA estimation error is
given by
i
h
(25)
θm ∈ θ̂m − ∆θ̂m,max , θ̂m + ∆θ̂ m,max
dn = (n −

∆θ̂m,max = ρ σθm ≈ ρ

p
(CRLBm ).

(26)

By increasing the value of ρ in (26), the probability that (25)
holds tends to one. We note that here we adopt ρ = 1 and
in the numerical section we examine the impact of ρ on the
secrecy performance of the proposed AR-NSP scheme.

(15)

where U is an unitary matrix, and Π is a diagonal matrix
given by
Π = diag(N Pb + σ̂ 2 , N Pe + σ̂ 2 , σ̂ 2 , · · · , σ̂ 2 ).

λ2

where
(14)

= UΠUH ,

(19)

B. Design of the AR-NSP Scheme
In (17), the estimated direction angle can be expanded as
θ̂m = θm + ∆θm ,

(27)

where θm is the ideal direction angle, and ∆θm stands for
the angle error. Combining (25) and the above expression, we
have
i
h
(28)
∆θm ∈ −∆θ̂m,max , ∆θ̂ m,max .
Additionally, for convenience of deriving below, the probability density function (PDF) of angle error is approximated to
be a uniform distribution given by

 1 , −∆θ̂
m,max ≤ ∆θm ≤ ∆θ̂ m,max ,
p (∆θm ) = 2∆θm

0,
otherwise,
(29)
where ∆θ̂ m,max denotes the interval of DOA estimation error.
Given the estimated direction angles θ̂b and θ̂e , in accordance with [17] and [34], we have the conditional expectation

5

of robust beamforming vector of the confidential information
and the AN projection vector as
E[v̄b | θ̂b , θ̂e ] = E[(IN − h(θe )hH (θe ))h(θb ) | θ̂b , θ̂e ]
= (IN − Re ) ub ,

U>k @

69'RI
FRYDULDQFHPDWUL[

(30)

Om

and

JÖm

Ö
5RRW086,& ș m
'2$HVWLPDWLRQ

respectively, where we define
Rb , E[h(θb )hH (θb ) | θ̂b ]

Re , E[h(θe )hH (θe ) | θ̂e ]

ub , E[h(θb ) | θ̂b ]

ue , E[h(θe ) | θ̂e ],

,

(33)

E[w̄e | θ̂b , θ̂e ]

.

(34)

'TÖm PD[

%HDPIRUPLQJ
YHFWRUDQG$1
YHFWRU
Yb

P

3UHGLFWLRQRI
HUURUUDQJH

(32)

E[v̄b | θ̂b , θ̂e ]

k E[v̄b | θ̂b , θ̂e ] k

&5/%
FDOFXODWLRQ

VT

șÖ m

and the corresponding normalized beamforming vector vb and
projection vector we can be written as
vb =

615
HVWLPDWLRQ

(N

E[w̄e | θ̂b , θ̂e ] = E[(IN − h(θb )hH (θb ))h(θe ) | θ̂b , θ̂e ]
= (IN − Rb ) ue ,
(31)

Ze

and
we =

k E[w̄e | θ̂b , θ̂e ] k

Since the estimated direction angles and their intervals of DOA
estimation errors are known, the derivation of p-th row and qth column entry of matrix Re is given by
Re (p, q) = E[hp (θ̂e − ∆θe )hH
q (θ̂e − ∆θe )]
Z ∆θ̂e,max
1
ejπ(q−p) cos(θ̂e −∆θe )
=
N −∆θ̂e,max
× p (∆θe ) d(∆θe ).

(35)

In order to simplify the presentation of (35), we define
apq = jπ(q − p) cos(θ̂e ),
bpq = jπ(q − p) sin(θ̂e ),

(36)
(37)

and define a new variable as
xe =

∆θe
,
ce

where
Z

ub (n) = E[hn (θ̂b − ∆θb )]
Z ∆θ̂b ,max
N +1
1
√
e−jπ(n− 2 ) cos(θ̂b −∆θb )
=
N −∆θ̂b ,max
× p(∆θb )d(∆θb )
Z π
1
= √
een cos(cb xb )+fn sin(cb xb ) dxb
2π N −π
1
(42)
= √ gI (en , fn , cb ),
N
where
en = −jπ(n −

N +1
) cos(θ̂b ),
2

(43)

fn = −jπ(n −

N +1
) sin(θ̂b ),
2

(44)

∆θb
,
cb

(45)

(39)

Using the above definition, (35) can be reformulated as
Z π
1
eapq cos(ce xe )+bpq sin(ce xe ) dxe
Re (p, q) =
2πN −π
1
= gI (apq , bpq , ce ),
(40)
N
1
gI (apq , bpq , ce ) =
2π

Likewise, we can derive the n-th element of vector ub as

(38)

where
ce = ∆θ̂e ,max π −1 .

Fig. 2. Block diagram of the proposed AR-NSP scheme.

π

eapq cos(ce xe )+bpq sin(ce xe ) dxe .

−π

(41)

xb =

cb = ∆θ̂b ,max π −1 .

(46)

Thus, the corresponding entry of matrix Rb and vector ue can
be computed in the same manner.
Taking the above two subsections into account, Fig. 2
presents the flow chart for the proposed AR-NSP scheme. At
the same time, we also summarize the detailed operational
procedures of our proposed AR-NSP scheme in Algorithm 1.

6

101
N=4
N=16
N=64

RMSE of Estimated SNRs(dB)

Algorithm 1 Proposed AR-NSP algorithm
1) Firstly, Bob and Eve act as transmitters and Alice (as the receiver) measures the Bob/desired and
Eve/eavesdropper direction angles via Root-MUSIC.
2) The receive SNR values for Bob and Eve at Alice are
estimated using the singular value ratio of SVD in RootMUSIC.
3) Using CRLBm on the basis of estimated direction
angle θ̂m and estimated SNR γ̂m , the intervals of DOA
estimation errors are approximately predicted.
4) The probability density functions of angle errors are
approximated as uniform distributions over the predicted
value ranges.
5) Finally, Alice (as the transmitter) adopts the proposed
AR-NSP beamforming method, to design the beamforming vector vb of confidential messages and projection
vector we of AN based on the results from Step 1) to
Step 4), and transmits confidential information to Bob.

100

10-1
-10

-5

0

5

10

Exact SNR (dB)

In this section, we numerically examine the secrecy performance of the proposed adaptive and robust NSP scheme. Without other statements, the adopted system parameters are set as
follows: quadrature phase shift keying(QPSK) modulation is
adopted, the spacing between two adjacent antennas is set as
d = λ/2, the total transmitting power is set as Ps = 30dBm,
PA factors are set as β12 = 0.9 and β22 = 0.1, the actual desired
direction is set as θb = 45◦ , and the actual eavesdropping
direction is set as θe = −30◦ .
15

Estimated SNR (dB)

10

N=4
N=16
N=64

Fig. 4. Root mean squared error of the SNR estimation versus exact SNR
with different numbers of antennas.

102

RMSE of Estimated DOAs (degree)

IV. N UMERICAL R ESULTS

RMSE (N=4)
CRLB (N=4)
RMSE (N=16)
CRLB (N=16)
RMSE(N=64)
CRLB (N=64)

101

100

10-1

10-2

5
10-3
-10
-4

-5

0

5

10

Exact SNR (dB)

0
-6

Fig. 5. Root mean squared error of the estimation of θ versus exact SNR
with different numbers of antennas.

-8

-5

-10
-10
-10
-10

-5

0

-5
5

10

Exact SNR (dB)
Fig. 3. Estimated SNR versus exact SNR with different numbers of antennas.

In Fig. 3, we plot the estimated SNR versus the exact SNR
with different numbers of antennas at Alice. In this figure,
we first observe that the estimated SNR becomes closer to
the exact SNR as the number of antennas increases. We also
observe that the estimated SNR slightly deviates from the exact

SNR when the exact SNR is less than 0dB and this deviation
increases as the exact SNR decreases. However, as we can see
from this figure, the estimated SNR is almost the same as the
exact SNR when SNR is higher than 0dB. This means that
the proposed SNR estimator can be viewed as an unbiased
estimator when the exact SNR is relatively high.
In Fig. 4, we plot the root mean squared error (RMSE)
of the SNR estimation versus the exact SNR with different
values of N . In this figure, we first observe that the RMSE
monotonously decreases with the exact SNR. In addition,
we observe that as the number of antennas at Alice (i.e.,
the value of N ) increases, the RMSE decreases. These two

7

100

3.6
SNR=4dB
SNR=8dB
SNR=12dB

3.2

Secrecy Rate (bits/s/Hz)

10-1

3.4

BER

10-2

10-3

10-4

3
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.2
2

Proposed AR-NSP scheme
Non-adaptive robust scheme in [28]
Non-robust NSP scheme in [24]

1.8
10-5
-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

log2ρ

Proposed AR-NSP scheme
Non-adaptive robust scheme in [28]
Non-robust NSP shceme in[24]

BER

10-1

10-2

10-3

2

3

4

5

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Fig. 8. SR of three different schemes versus the value interval of DOA
estimation errors (SNR=10dB, N=16).

100

1

1

Value interval of DOA estimation errors (degree)

Fig. 6. BER versus different values of ρ with different SNRs.

10-4

1.6

6

7

8

9

10

Interval of DOA estimation errors (degree)
Fig. 7. BER of three different schemes versus the value interval of DOA
estimation errors (SNR=10dB, N=16).

observations indicate that the estimation accuracy of the SNR
can be improved by increasing the number of receive antennas
at Alice or increasing the transmit power.
In order to examine the accuracy of the estimated angle
achieved by Root-MUSIC, in Fig. 5 we plot the RMSE of the
estimation of θ versus the exact SNR with different numbers
of antennas at Alice, while the corresponding CRLB is also
presented as a benchmark. In this figure, we first observe
that as the exact SNR increases, both the RMSE and CRLB
monotonously decrease and the RMSE becomes closer to
the CRLB. This demonstrates that the performance of ROOT
MUSIC DOA estimation is better in the high SNR regimes

than in the low SNR regimes. In addition, in this figure we
observe that both the RMSE and CRLB decreases as the
number of antennas at Alice increases, which shows that the
direction angle estimation is more accurate when the numbers
of antennas becomes larger. Furthermore, from this figure we
can see that the RMSE is almost the same as the CRLB when
the exact SNR is higher than 0dB. This means that the RootMUSIC is a consistent estimator of direction angle. Finally, in
this figure we observe that the RMSE converges to the CRLB
more rapidly as the exact SNR increases when the number of
antennas at Alice is larger.
In Fig. 6, we plot the BER (i.e., bit error rate) achieved
by the proposed AR-NSP scheme versus different values of ρ
with different SNRs in order to examine the impact of different
values of ρ on the secrecy performance of the proposed ARNSP scheme. In this figure, we first observe that the BER of
the proposed scheme is indeed a function of ρ and there is
an optimal value of ρ that minimizes the corresponding BER.
Surprisingly, under the specific system settings we observe that
ρ = 1 achieves the minimum BER, which is the reason that
we adopt ρ = 1 in the proposed AR-NSP scheme. In addition,
we observe that the BER is more sensitive to the values of ρ
when ρ > 1 relative to when ρ ≤ 1. As such, without enough
information or resource to determining the optimal value of ρ,
it is reasonable to set ρ ≤ 1 in order to reduce the impact of ρ
on the secrecy performance of the proposed AR-NSP scheme.
In Fig. 7, we examine the BER performance of the proposed AR-NSP scheme, with the non-adaptive robust scheme
proposed in [28] and the non-robust NSP scheme proposed
in [24] as benchmarks. Specifically, in Fig. 7 we plot the
BER of the three schemes versus the value interval of DOA
estimation errors with SNR=10dB and N=16. In this figure, we
observe that the BER of the proposed scheme is much lower
than that of the other benchmark schemes. In general, the

8

(a) Phase versus direction angle of non-robust NSP scheme

(b) Phase versus direction angle of non-adaptive robust scheme

BER performance gap becomes more dominant as the value
interval of DOA estimation errors increases. This demonstrates
the superiority of the proposed scheme over the other two
schemes. Furthermore, as expected we observe that the BER
of the three schemes increases with the value interval of DOA
estimation errors.
In Fig. 8, we show the SR (i.e., secrecy rate) of the proposed
AR-NSP scheme versus the value interval of DOA estimation
errors, again with the non-adaptive robust scheme proposed
in [28] and the non-robust NSP scheme proposed in [24] as
benchmarks. In this figure, we first observe that the SRs of
the three schemes decrease as the interval of DOA estimation
errors increases. This is due to the fact that the probability of
the estimated direction angle deviating from the exact direction
angle becomes larger as the interval of DOA estimation errors
becomes larger. In addition, we observe that the proposed ARNSP scheme outperforms the other two schemes in terms of
achieving a much higher SR. Furthermore, in this figure we
observe that the SR performance gap between the proposed
scheme and the other two schemes increases as the interval of
DOA estimation errors increases. This can be explained by the
fact that the beamforming vector of confidential information
and projection vector of AN in the proposed AR-NSP scheme
are averaged over different channel conditions, while they are
set without considering different channel conditions in the
other two schemes.
In order to examine the phase of signal constellation versus
direction angle (namely eye patten) of the proposed AR-NSP
scheme. Fig. 9 presents the eye patterns of 1000 random
QPSK symbols of the proposed AR-NSP scheme, the nonadaptive robust scheme proposed in [28], and the non-robust
NSP scheme proposed in [24], where the interval of DOA
estimation errors is 4 degree. From the three subfigures, we can
see that the eye pattern of the proposed scheme in subfigure
(c) opens larger and cleaner than those of the other two
schemes presented in subfigure (a) and (b). This means that
the proposed method can reduce the effect of AN along the
desired direction and push more AN towards the eavesdropper
direction. This is the main reason that our proposed AR-NSP
scheme can significantly outperform the other two schemes.
V. C ONCLUSION

(c) Phase versus direction angle of proposed AR-NSP scheme
Fig. 9. Eye patterns of three different schemes when the value interval of
DOA estimation errors is 4 degree.

In this paper, we proposed the AR-NSP scheme to enhance PLS of DM systems in wireless networks. In the
proposed scheme, the DOAs and SNRs of the desired user
and eavesdropper are firstly estimated, based on which the
value intervals of DOA estimation errors are predicted. Then,
the beamforming vector of the confidential information and
the AN projection vector are designed as per these estimated
DOAs/SNRs and the predicted error intervals. Our examination shows that the proposed AR-NSP scheme can significantly
outperform two benchmark schemes in terms of achieving a
lower BER and a higher SR. In the context of DM systems,
the proposed scheme eliminates the impractical assumption of
applying PLS, which is that the exact or estimated locations
of the desired user and eavesdropper are a priori available. As
such, the proposed scheme can potentially achieve the ever-

9

lasting information-theoretic security in some practical scenarios, such as IoT, future mobile communications, satellite communications, device-to-device, vehicle-to-vehicle, millimeterwave communications, smart transportation, and unmannedaerial-vehicles networks.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported in part by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61771244, 61501238,
61702258, 61472190, and 61271230), in part by the Open
Research Fund of National Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic
Environment, China Research Institute of Radiowave Propagation (No. 201500013), in part by the Jiangsu Provincial
Science Foundation under Project BK20150786, in part by the
Specially Appointed Professor Program in Jiangsu Province,
2015, in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the
Central Universities under Grant 30916011205, and in part
by the open research fund of National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory, Southeast University, China (Nos.
2017D04 and 2013D02).
R EFERENCES
[1] H. Gunasinghe and E. Bertino, “Privbiomtauth privacy preserving
biometrics-based and user centric protocol for user authentication from
mobile phones,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 13, no. 4, pp.
1042–1057, Apr. 2018.
[2] X. Yuan, X. Wang, C. Wang, C. Yu, and S. Nutanong, “Privacypreserving similarity joins over encrypted data,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 2763–2775, Nov. 2017.
[3] X. Zhao and H. Li, “Privacy preserving data-sharing scheme in contentcentric networks against collusion name guessing attacks,” IEEE Access,
vol. 5, pp. 23 182–23 189, Aug. 2017.
[4] F. Li, H. L. Y. He, B. Niu, and H. Wang, “Match-more: An efficient
private matching scheme using friends-of-friends recommendation,” International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications
(ICNC), pp. 1–6, Feb. 2016.
[5] A. D. Wyner, “The wire-tap channel,” Bell. Syst. Tech. J., vol. 54, no. 8,
pp. 1355–1387, Oct. 1975.
[6] Y. Zou and J. Zhu, Physical-Layer Security for Cooperative Relay
Networks. Springer International Publishing, 2016.
[7] Z. Fei, B. Li, S. Yang, C. Xing, H. Chen, and L. Hanzo, “A survey
of multi-objective optimization in wireless sensor networks: Metrics,
algorithms and open problems,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts, vol. 19,
no. 1, pp. 550–586, Feb. 2017.
[8] W. Trappe, “The challenges facing physical layer security,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 16–20, June. 2015.
[9] B. Chen, C. Zhu, W. Li, J. Wei, V. C. M. Leung, and L. T. Yang,
“Original symbol phase rotated secure transmission against powerful
massive mimo eavesdropper,” IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 3016–3025, July.
2016.
[10] S. Goel and R. Negi, “Guaranteeing secrecy using artificial noise,” IEEE
Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 2180–2189, June. 2008.
[11] N. Zhao, F. R. Yu, M. Li, Q. Yan, and V. C. Leung, “Physical layer
security issues in interference-alignment-based wireless networks,” IEEE
Commun. Mag., vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 162–168, Aug. 2016.
[12] S. Yan, X. Zhou, N. Yang, B. He, and T. D. Abhayapala, “Artificialnoise-aided secure transmission in wiretap channels with transmitter-side
correlation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 8286–
8297, Dec. 2016.
[13] N. Yang, S. Yan, J. Yuan, R. Malaney, R. Subramanian, and I. Land,
“Artificial noise: Transmission optimization in multi-input single-output
wiretap channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1771–1783,
May. 2015.
[14] J. Hu, S. Yan, F. Shu, J. Wang, J. Li, and Y. Zhang, “Artificial-noiseaided secure transmission with directional modulation based on random
frequency diverse arrays,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 1658–1667, Mar.
2017.

[15] Y. L. Zou, B. Champagne, W.-P. Zhu, and L. Hanzo, “Relay-selection
improves the security-reliability trade-off in cognitive radio systems,”
IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 215–228, Jan. 2015.
[16] H. Wang, Q. Yin, and X.-G. Xia, “Distributed beamforming for physicallayer security of two-way relay networks,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process,
vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 3532–3545, July. 2012.
[17] L. Dong, Z. Han, A. P. Petropulu, and H. V. Poor, “Improving wireless
physical layer security via cooperating relays,” IEEE Trans. Signal
Process, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 1875–1888, Mar. 2010.
[18] A. Kalantari, M. Soltanalian, S. Maleki, S. Chatzinotas, and B. Ottersten,
“Directional modulation via symbol-level precoding: A way to enhance
security,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1478–
1493, Dec. 2016.
[19] J. A. Stankovic, “Research directions for the internet of things,” IEEE
Internet Things J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–9, Feb. 2014.
[20] A. Mukherjee, “Physical-layer security in the internet of things: Sensing
and communication confidentiality under resource constraints,” Proc.
IEEE, vol. 103, no. 10, pp. 1747–1761, Oct. 2015.
[21] Q. Xu, P. Ren, H. Song, and Q. Du, “Security enhancement for iot
communications exposed to eavesdroppers with uncertain locations,”
IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 2840–2853, Jun. 2016.
[22] L. Hu, H. Wen, B. Wu, F. Pan, R. Liao, H. Song, J. Tang, and
X. Wang, “Cooperative jamming for physical layer security enhancement
in internet of things,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–1,
2017.
[23] W. Wang, Z. Sun, K. Ren, and B. Zhu, “Increasing user capacity of
wireless physical-layer identification in internet of things,” IEEE Global
Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1–6, Dec. 2016.
[24] Y. Ding and V. Fusco, “A vector approach for the analysis and synthesis
of directional modulation transmitters,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.,
vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 361–370, Jan. 2014.
[25] T. Xie, J. Zhu, and Y. Li, “Artificial-noise-aided zero-forcing synthesis
approach for secure multi-beam directional modulation,” IEEE Commun.
Lett., vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–1, 2017.
[26] M. Sadek, A. Tarighat, and A. H. Sayed, “A leakage-based procoding
scheme for downlink multi-user MIMO channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless
Commun., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1711–1721, June. 2007.
[27] F. Shu, J. J. Tong, X. H. You, C. Gu, and J. J. Wu, “Adaptive robust maxslnr precoder for mu-mimo-ofdm systems with imperfect csi,” Science
China, vol. 59, no. 6, p. 062302:1C062302:14, 2016.
[28] J. Hu, F. Shu, and J. Li, “Robust synthesis method for secure directional modulation with imperfect direction angle,” IEEE Commun. Lett.,
vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1084–1087, June. 2016.
[29] F. Shu, X. Wu, J. Li, R. Chen, and B. Vucetic, “Robust synthesis scheme
for secure multi-beam directional modulation in broadcasting systems,”
IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 6614–6623, Oct. 2016.
[30] F. Shu, W. Zhu, X. Zhou, J. Li, and J. Lu, “Robust secure transmission
of using main-lobe-integration based leakage beaforming in directional
modulation MU-MIMO systems,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. PP, no. 99, pp.
1–11, Nov. 2017.
[31] F. Shu, L. Xu, J. Wang, W. Zhu, , and X. Zhou, “Artificial-noise-aided
secure multicast precoding for directional modulation systems,” IEEE
Trans. Veh. Technol., accepted with minor revision, Dec. 2017.
[32] F. Gross, Smart Antennas for Wireless Communications: With MATLAB.
McGraw-Hill Education, 2005.
[33] T. E. Tuncer and B. Friedlander, Classic and Modern Direction-ofArrival Estimation. Burlington, MA: Academic Press, 2009.
[34] K. Thomas, S. A. H, and H. Babak, Linear Estimation.
Pearson
Education Inc, 2000.

