IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, VOL. XX, NO. XX, XXXX 2016

1

Saliency Detection for Stereoscopic Images Based
on Depth Confidence Analysis and Multiple Cues
Fusion

arXiv:1710.05174v1 [cs.CV] 14 Oct 2017

Runmin Cong, Student Member, IEEE, Jianjun Lei, Member, IEEE, Changqing Zhang,
Qingming Huang, Senior Member, IEEE, Xiaochun Cao, Senior Member, IEEE, and Chunping Hou

Abstract—Stereoscopic perception is an important part of
human visual system that allows the brain to perceive depth.
However, depth information has not been well explored in existing
saliency detection models. In this letter, a novel saliency detection
method for stereoscopic images is proposed. Firstly, we propose
a measure to evaluate the reliability of depth map, and use it to
reduce the influence of poor depth map on saliency detection.
Then, the input image is represented as a graph, and the
depth information is introduced into graph construction. After
that, a new definition of compactness using color and depth
cues is put forward to compute the compactness saliency map.
In order to compensate the detection errors of compactness
saliency when the salient regions have similar appearances with
background, foreground saliency map is calculated based on
depth-refined foreground seeds selection mechanism and multiple
cues contrast. Finally, these two saliency maps are integrated into
a final saliency map through weighted-sum method according to
their importance. Experiments on two publicly available stereo
datasets demonstrate that the proposed method performs better
than other 10 state-of-the-art approaches.
Index Terms—Depth confidence measure, color and depthbased compactness, multiple cues, saliency detection.

I. I NTRODUCTION
CCORDING to the principle of human visual perception,
people would like to place more attention on the region
which stands out from the image background. Saliency detection is becoming an increasingly important branch in computer
vision due to its various applications in object detection and
recognition [1], [2], image retrieval [3], image compression
[4], [5], and image retargeting [6], [7]. Generally, saliency
detection models can be categorized into data-driven bottomup model and task-driven top-down model [8]. In this letter,
we focus on bottom-up saliency detection models.
Saliency detection aims to effectively highlight salient regions and suppress background regions. By far, many saliency

A

Manuscript received January, 2016. This work was partially supported
by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61271324, 61520106002,
61471262, 91320201). Copyright (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to use this material for any other
purposes must be obtained from the IEEE by sending a request to pubspermissions@ieee.org.
R. Cong, J. Lei (corresponding author), and C. Hou are with the School of
Electronic Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
(e-mail: rmcong@tju.edu.cn; jjlei@tju.edu.cn; hcp@tju.edu.cn).
C. Zhang is with the School of Computer Science and Technology, Tianjin
University, Tianjin 300072, China (e-mail: zhangchangqing@tju.edu.cn).
Q. Huang is with Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing 100190, China (e-mail: qmhuang@ucas.ac.cn).
X. Cao is with Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing 100093, China (e-mail: caoxiaochun@iie.ac.cn).

detection methods for RGB image have been put forward,
which integrate different visual cues to compute the saliency
map. As a pioneer, Itti et al. [9] presented a multi-scale
saliency detection model, which computes center-surround
differences using three visual features including color, intensity, and orientation. Cheng et al. [10], [11] proposed a
region-based saliency model that measures the global contrast
between the target regions with respect to all other regions
in the image. In [12], graph-based manifold ranking was
introduced into saliency detection model, which ranks the
differences between salient object and background. Wei et al.
[13] proposed a multiple saliency methods fusion framework
based on Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST), and improved the
performance of saliency detection. Sun et al. [14] cast saliency
detection into a Markov problem, which integrate background
prior and Markov absorption probability on a weighted graph.
Recently, some new methods combine multiple cues into
saliency detection model to achieve a better result. In [15],
Zhou et al. found that compactness and local contrast are
complementary to each other, and proposed a saliency detection method that integrates compactness and local contrast. In
[16], Li et al. proposed a novel label propagation method for
saliency detection, which integrates backgroundness, objectness, and compactness cues.
Most previous works on saliency detection are focused
on 2D images, which mainly concentrate on RGB color
information while ignoring depth/disparity cue [17], [18]. In
fact, 3D visual information can supply a useful cue for saliency
detection [19], [20]. Niu et al. [21] proposed a saliency model
for stereoscopic images based on global disparity contrast and
domain knowledge in stereoscopic photography. Desingh et
al. [22] computed the stereo saliency by fusing depth saliency
with 2D saliency models, which through non-linear support
vector regression. In [23], the disparity maps are used to refine
the 2D saliency model and maintain the consistency between
the stereo matching and saliency maps. Ju et al. [24], [25]
proposed a depth-aware method for saliency detection, using
an anisotropic center-surround difference (ACSD) measure.
In addition, they construct a large dataset for stereo saliency
detection, which includes 1985 stereo images and estimated
depth maps.
Considering the effectivity of integrating depth information,
we propose a novel saliency detection model for stereoscopic
images in this letter. The main contributions can be summarized as follows: 1) A good depth map can be benefit for the

IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, VOL. XX, NO. XX, XXXX 2016

saliency detection no matter how it produced. Consequently,
it is vital that construct a measure to describe the quality of
depth map. According to the observation of depth distribution,
a confidence measure for depth map is proposed to reduce the
influence of poor depth map on saliency detection; 2) A novel
model for compactness integrating color and depth information
is put forward to compute the compactness saliency; 3) A
foreground seeds selection mechanism based on depth-refined
is presented. The saliency is measured by contrast between the
target regions with seed regions, which integrate color, depth,
and texture cues.
II. P ROPOSED M ETHOD
The flowchart of the proposed stereo saliency detection
method is depicted as Fig. 1. There are four parts in our
method. Firstly, a novel confidence measure is calculated to
evaluate the reliability of depth map, and used in the following
processes. The depth confidence measure can reduce the influence of poor depth map on saliency detection. Simultaneously,
RGB image is abstracted into superpixels and represented
as a graph. Then, compactness saliency based on color and
depth cues is calculated. Further, foreground seeds are selected
by combining compactness saliency result and depth map.
Taking color, depth, and texture cues into consideration, a
multiple cues contrast saliency detection method based on
foreground seeds is proposed. At last, compactness and foreground saliency map are weighted to obtain the final saliency
map.

2

(a)

(b)

(c)

Fig. 2. Different quality of depth maps. (a) Good depth map, λd = 0.8014.
(b) Common depth map, λd = 0.3890. (c) Poor depth map, λd = 0.0422.

whole depth image is an effective parameter to tell them
apart. In statistics, coefficient of variation is used to evaluate
the dispersion degree of the data. It is observed that the
poor depth map appears strong concentration compared with
other cases. Thus, the coefficient of variation is introduced in
our confidence measure. In addition, there is a more random
distribution for a common depth map, therefore, the depth
frequency entropy is defined to evaluate the randomness of
an input depth image. According to these observations of
depth distribution, we define the depth confidence measure
as follows.
λd = exp((1 − md ) · CV · H) − 1

(1)

where md is the mean value of the whole depth image,
CV = md /σd is coefficient of variation, σd is the standard
deviation for depth image, and H is the depth frequency
entropy, which denotes the randomness of depth distribution,
and can be defined as follows.
H=−

L
X

Pi log(Pi )

(2)

i=1
Graph Construction and
Depth Confidence Measure
SLIC

RGB Image

STAGE 1
Compactness
Saliency Using
Color and
Depth Cues

Depth
Confidence
Measure

a
Depth-refined
Foreground Seeds
Selection (DRSS)

Superpixels

Depth
Distribution

Saliency Map

STAGE 2

Foreground
Saliency Using
Multiple Cues
Contrast



Ground Truth

b

Depth Image

Fig. 1. Flowchart of the proposed method.

A. Depth Confidence Measure
The quality of depth map is very important for the using
of depth cue. A good depth map can provide accurate depth
information which benefits for saliency detection. In contrast,
the poor depth map may cause a wrong detection. Thus, a
depth confidence measure is proposed in this letter to evaluate
the reliability of depth map. We found that a good depth
map often owns clear hierarchy, and the salient object can be
highlighted from the background. Fig. 2 shows some examples
of different quality depth maps.
We rank the input depth map into three grades roughly,
namely good, common, and bad. Based on the observation
of depth statistical characteristic, we found that the values are
usually concentrate on lower part for good depth map, whereas
the distribution of poor depth map tends to concentrate on
relatively larger values. Therefore, the mean value of the

where Pi = ni /nΣ , nΣ is the number of pixels in the depth
map, ni is the number of pixels that belong to the region level
ri , and L is the levels of depth map. In this letter, the input
depth map is normalized to [0, 1] firstly. Then, L−1 thresholds,
namely Tk , are used to divide the depth map into L levels. A
larger λd corresponds to more reliable of the input depth map.
B. Graph Construction
The input RGB image is abstracted into homogenous and
compact regions using SLIC superpixel segmentation method
[26]. The number of superpixel N is set to 200 in experiments.
Then, we construct a graph G = (V, E), where V represents
the set of nodes which corresponds to the superpixels generated by SLIC method, and E denotes the set of links between
adjacent nodes.
In this work, the Euclidean distance lij in CIE Lab color
space and depth difference dij between superpixels vi and vj
are defined as
lij = kci − cj k
(3)
and
dij = |di − dj |

(4)

where ci is the mean color value of superpixel vi , and di
denotes the mean depth value of superpixel vi . The similarity
between two superpixels aij is defined as
aij = exp(−

lij + λd · dij
)
σ2

(5)

IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, VOL. XX, NO. XX, XXXX 2016

3

where σ 2 is a parameter to control strength of the similarity,
and it is set to 0.1 in all our experiments. The affinity matrix
W = [wij ]N ×N is defined as the similarity between two
adjacent superpixels
(
wij =

aij
0

if j ∈ Ωi
otherwise

(6)

where Ωi is the set of neighbors of superpixel vi .

C. Compactness Saliency Using Color and Depth Cues
Intuitively, salient regions have compact spread in spatial
domain, whereas the colors of background regions have a
larger spread over the whole image [15]. In addition, the
values of depth exhibit limited compactness, that is, the depth
values of salient regions are more likely to have a centralized
distribution near the center of image. Motivated by this, we
calculate the compactness saliency using color and depth cues.
To obtain more precise result, we first propagate the similarity
aij using manifold ranking method [27].
Zhou et al. proposed a compactness metric using color
spatial information in [15]. In this letter, a novel measure is
proposed to calculate the color and depth-based compactness.
The saliency map based on compactness is defined as
SCS (i) = [1 − norm(cc(i) + dc(i))] · Obj(i)

(7)

where cc(i) is the color-based compactness of superpixel vi ,
dc(i) is the depth-based compactness of superpixel vi , and
norm(x) is a function that normalizes x to [0, 1] using minmax normalization. Considering the importance of location
for saliency detection, objectness measure [28] Obj(i) is
introduced in our model to evaluate the probability of superpixel vi that belongs to an object. The color and depth-based
compactness are defined as
PN
j=1 aij · nj · kbj − µi k
cc(i) =
(8)
PN
j=1 aij · nj
and
PN
dc(i) =

j=1

i
aij · nj · kbj − pk · exp(− λdσ·d
2 )
PN
j=1 aij · nj

(9)

where nj denotes the number of pixels that belong to superpixel vj , which emphasizes the impact of larger region,
bj = [bxj , byj ] is the centroid coordinate of superpixel vj ,
p = [cx , cy ] is the spatial position of the image center, and
the spatial mean µi = [µxi , µyi ] is defined as
PN
µxi

=

x
j=1 aij · nj · bj
PN
j=1 aij · nj

(10)

D. Foreground Saliency Using Multiple Cues Contrast
Although compactness saliency detection method is active
on some level, there are some limitations. When the salient
regions have similar appearances with background, the regions
may be wrongly detected. Hence, a foreground saliency detection method based on multiple cues contrast is proposed to
mitigate this problem.
Traditionally, foreground seeds are selected just based on the
preliminary saliency map. Considering the importance of depth
information, a novel selection mechanism for foreground seeds
is introduced, in which the seeds should own larger values of
compactness saliency and depth simultaneously. Therefore, a
depth-refined foreground seeds selection method (DRSS) is
proposed, and the flowchart is shown in Fig. 3. Firstly, preliminary seeds are determined by thresholding segmentation
using compactness saliency map, where the threshold τ is set
to 0.5. Then, the mean depth value of preliminary seeds is used
to refine the preliminary seeds, and obtain the final foreground
seeds set.
SCS

SCS  

Yes

Preliminary seeds set

 

md 

p

PN
µyi =

y
j=1 aij · nj · bj
PN
j=1 aij · nj

(11)

d

i  p

i

Depth map

Foreground seeds set

 s 

Yes

di  md

Fig. 3. Flowchart of depth-refined foreground seeds selection mechanism.

Next, we calculate the contrast of each superpixel with the
foreground seeds based on multiple cues, which include color,
depth, texture, and position information. A superpixel is more
likely to be salient if it is more similar to the foreground seeds.
The foreground saliency is computed as follows.
X
Sf g (i) =
[aij · Dt (i, j) · exp(−kbi − bj k/σ 2 ) · nj ] (12)
j∈Ωs

where Ωs is the set of foreground seeds, kbi − bj k denotes
the Euclidean distance between position of superpixels, and
Dt (i, j) is the texture similarity between superpixels using
LBP feature [29], which defined as follows.
|kTi kj |
(13)
kki kkkj k
where ki is LBP histogram frequency of superpixel vi . To
avoid the problem that saliency map highlights object boundaries rather than the entire region, manifold ranking method
is used to propagate the foreground saliency map. At last, the
map after propagation is normalized to [0, 1], and the final
foreground saliency map SF S is obtained.
Dt (i, j) =

E. Saliency Map Integration
The compactness and foreground saliency maps are complementary to each other. Considering the foreground saliency
map is based on the compactness saliency result, we integrate
these two saliency map into a final saliency map through
weighted-sum method.
S = γ · SCS + (1 − γ) · SF S

and

1
p

(14)

where γ balances the compactness saliency map SCS and
foreground saliency map SF S .

IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, VOL. XX, NO. XX, XXXX 2016

III. E XPERIMENTAL R ESULTS
We evaluate the performance of our method on two datasets:
NJU-400 [24] and NJU-1985 [25], which include RGB images, depth maps, and pixel-wise ground truth annotations.
The performance is evaluated using precision-recall curve,
F-measure, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) [10], [30],
[31]. The precision-recall curve is obtained by binarizing the
saliency map using thresholds in the range of 0 and 255. In
all experiments, we set the parameters L = 3, T1 = 0.4,
T2 = 0.6, and γ = 0.8.
A. Performance Comparison
We compare our method with 8 state-of-the-art 2D methods: RC [11], MR [12], DS [13], MAP [14], DCLC [15],
LPS [16], BSCA [31], RRWR [32], and 2 stereo saliency
detection methods: SS [21], ACSD [25]. Fig. 4 shows the
evaluation results of the proposed method with 10 state-of-theart methods on two datasets. On both datasets, the precisionrecall curves show that the proposed method performed better
than other methods. Similarly, the proposed method achieves
the best performance in terms of the average precision, Fmeasure, and MAE compared with other approaches due to the
depth confidence analysis and two-stage saliency computation
mechanism. Taking the F-measure on the NJU-1985 dataset
as an example, the F-measure values of two stereo saliency
detection methods (ACSD and our method) are 0.5552 and
0.6055, respectively. Nevertheless, our method achieved a
lightly lower average recall value than ACSD method. In
the future work, the recall value should be improved on the
premise of that the value of precision has been maintained. Fig.
5 presents visual comparison of different saliency detection
methods. The proposed method has more similar appearances
with ground truth, and owns clear contour and uniform salient
regions. Furthermore, the F-measure values in Fig. 5 also
demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method.

4

F-measure:

0.713

0.777

0.620

0.581

0.667

0.780

F-measure:

0.658

0.660

0.726

0.525

0.546

0.748

F-measure:

0.646

0.742

0.700

0.576

0.727

0.804

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(a)

(b)

(i)

Fig. 5. Visual comparison of saliency maps. (a) Input RGB image. (b) Input
depth image. (c) RC [11]. (d) RRWR [32]. (e) DCLC [15]. (f) SS [21]. (g)
ACSD [25]. (h) Ours. (i) Ground truth.

B. Parameter Analysis
In this section, we evaluate the performance of our method
under different factors. The precision-recall curves and quantitative indexes are shown in Fig. 6. In order to reduce the
influence of poor depth map in stereo saliency detection, depth
confidence measure λd is introduced in our letter. Comparing
the black line with the blue line in Fig. 6(a), it demonstrated
that the performance with λd is superior to not using depth
confidence measure, and the same conclusion can be drawn
from the comparison of the first two columns in Fig. 6(b). At
the stage of foreground saliency detection, a novel foreground
seeds selection mechanism using depth information, namely
DRSS, is proposed to acquire more accurate foreground seeds.
As shown in Fig. 6, the DRSS process can achieve higher
precision rate, and improve the performance of the final result
according to the precision-recall curve.

(a)

(b)

Fig. 6. Evaluation of different factors for final saliency detection on NJU-400
dataset. (a) Precision-recall curves of different factors. (b) Average precision,
recall, F-measure, and MAE of different factors.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Fig. 4. The quantitative comparison of proposed method with 10 state-ofthe-art methods. (a) Precision-recall curves of different methods on NJU400 dataset. (b) Average precision, recall, F-measure, and MAE of different
methods on NJU-400 dataset. (c) Precision-recall curves of different methods
on NJU-1985 dataset. (d) Average precision, recall, F-measure, and MAE of
different methods on NJU-1985 dataset.

IV. C ONCLUSION
In this letter, a novel saliency detection model for stereoscopic images based on depth confidence analysis and multiple
cues fusion is presented. First, the quality of depth map is
considered when introduces the depth information into the
saliency model, and a depth confidence measure is proposed
to evaluate the reliability of depth map. In addition, a novel
model for compactness integrating color and depth information
is proposed to compute the compactness saliency. To achieve
more robust saliency detection result, a foreground saliency
detection method based on multiple cues contrast is proposed,
which includes a novel depth-refined foreground seeds selection method. At last, weighted-sum method is used to generate
the final saliency map. Experimental evaluation on two public
benchmarks has validated the advantages of our approach.

IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, VOL. XX, NO. XX, XXXX 2016

R EFERENCES
[1] Z. Ren, S. Gao, L. T. Chia, and I. Tsang, “Region-based saliency
detection and its application in object recognition,” IEEE Trans. Circuits
Syst. Video Technol., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 769-779, 2014.
[2] Z. Wang, K. Liao, J. Xiong, and Q. Zhang, “Moving object detection
based on temporal information,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 21, no.
11, pp. 1403-1407, 2014.
[3] Y. Gao, M. Shi, D. Tao, and C Xu, “Database saliency for fast image
retrieval,” IEEE Trans. Multimedia, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 359-369, 2015.
[4] S. Han, and N. Vasconcelos, “Image compression using object-based
regions of interest,” in Proc. IEEE ICIP, 2006, pp. 3097-3100.
[5] Y. Hou, P. Wang, W. Xiang, Z. Gao, and C. Hou, “A novel rate control
algorithm for video coding based on fuzzy-PID controller,” Signal Image
Video Process., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 875-884, 2015.
[6] J. W. Yoo, S. Yea, and I. K. Park, “Content-driven retargeting of
stereoscopic images,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 20, no. 5, pp.
519-522, 2013.
[7] R. Gallea, E. Ardizzone, and R. Pirrone, “Physical metaphor for streaming media retargeting,” IEEE Trans. Multimedia, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 971979, 2014.
[8] Y. Fang, Z. Wang, W. Lin, and Z. Fang, “Video saliency incorporating
spatiotemporal cues and uncertainty weighting,” IEEE Trans. Image
Process., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 3910-3921, 2014.
[9] L. Itti, C. Koch, and E. Niebur, “A model of saliency-based visual
attention for rapid scene analysis,” IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell.,
vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1254-1259, 1998.
[10] M. M. Cheng, G.-X. Zhang, N. J. Mitra, X. Huang, and S.-M. Hu,
“Global contrast based salient region detection,” in Proc. CVPR, 2011,
pp. 409-416.
[11] M.-M. Cheng, N. J. Mitra, X. Huang, P. H. S. Torr, and S.-M. Hu,
“Global contrast based salient region detection,” IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal.
Mach. Intell., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 569-582, 2015.
[12] C. Yang, L. Zhang, H. Lu, X. Ruan, and M.-H. Yang, “Saliency detection
via graph-based manifold ranking,” in Proc. CVPR, 2013, pp. 31663173.
[13] X. Wei, Z. Tao, C. Zhang, and X. Cao, “Structured saliency fusion based
on dempster-shafer theory,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 22, no. 9,
pp. 1345-1349, 2015.
[14] J. Sun, H. Lu, and X. Liu, “Saliency region detection based on markov
absorption probabilities,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 24, no. 5,
pp. 1639-1649, 2015.
[15] L. Zhou, Z. Yang, Q. Yuan, Z. Zhou, and D. Hu, “Salient region detection
via integrating diffusion-based compactness and local contrast,” IEEE
Trans. Image Process., vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 3308-3320, 2015.
[16] H. Li, H. Lu, Z. Lin, X. Shen, and B. Price, “Inner and inter label
propagation: Salient object detection in the wild,” IEEE Trans. Image
Process., vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 3176-3186, 2015.
[17] H. Fu, D. Xu, S. Lin, and J. Liu, “Object-based RGBD image cosegmentation with mutex constraint,” in Proc. CVPR, 2015, pp. 44284436.
[18] J. Lei, J. Liu, H. Zhang, Z. Gu, N. Ling, and C. Hou, “Motion and
structure information based adaptive weighted depth video estimation,”
IEEE Trans. Broadcasting, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 416-424, 2015.
[19] Y. Fang, J. Wang, M. Narwaria, P. Le Callet, and W. Lin, “Saliency
detection for stereoscopic images,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol.
23, no. 6, pp. 2625-2636, 2014.
[20] J. Lei, H. Zhang, L. You, C. Hou, and L. Wang, “Evaluation and
modeling of depth feature incorporated visual attention for salient object
segmentation,” Neurocomputing, vol. 120, pp. 24-33, 2013.
[21] Y. Niu, Y. Geng, X. Li, and F. Liu, “Leveraging stereopsis for saliency
analysis,” in Proc. CVPR, 2012, pp. 454-461.
[22] K. Desingh, K. M. Krishna, D. Rajan, and C. V. Jawahar, “Depth really
matters: Improving visual salient region detection with depth,” In Proc.
BMVC, 2013, pp. 1-11.
[23] F. Guo, J. Shen, and X. Li, “Learning to detect stereo saliency,” in Proc.
ICME, 2014, pp.1-6.
[24] R. Ju, L. Ge, W. Geng, T. Ren, and G. Wu, “Depth saliency based on
anisotropic center-surround difference,” in Proc. IEEE ICIP, 2014, pp.
1115-1119.
[25] R. Ju, Y. Liu, T. Ren, L. Ge, and G. Wu, “Depth-aware salient object
detection using anisotropic center-surround difference,” Signal Process.:
Image Commun., vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 115-126, 2015.
[26] R. Achanta, A. Shaji, K. Smith, A. Lucchi, P. Fua, and S. Susstrunk,
“SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods,”
IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 2274-2282,
2012.

5

[27] D. Zhou, J. Weston, A. Gretton, O. Bousquet, and B. Schölkopf,
“Ranking on data manifolds,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.,
2004, pp. 169-176.
[28] B. Alexe, T. Deselaers, and V. Ferrari, “Measuring the objectness of
image windows,” IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 34, no. 11,
pp. 2189-2202, 2012.
[29] T. Ojala, M. Pietikainen, and T. Maenpaa, “Multiresolution gray-scale
and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns,”
IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 24, no. 17, pp. 971-987, 2002.
[30] Y. Fang, W. Lin, Z. Fang, Z. Chen, C.-W. Lin, and C. Deng, “Visual
acuity inspired saliency detection by using sparse features,” Inf. Sci.,
vol. 309, pp. 1-10, 2015
[31] Y. Qin, H. Lu, Y. Xu, and H. Wang, “Saliency detection via cellular
automata,” in Proc. CVPR, 2015, pp. 110-119.
[32] C. Li, Y. Yuan, W. Cai, Y. Xia, and D. D. Feng, “Robust saliency
detection via regularized random walks ranking,” in Proc. CVPR, 2015,
pp. 2710-2717.

