Analysis of Investment Policy in Belarus
Fedor S. Kilin
Belarus State University, Skaryna Ave. 4, 220050 Minsk, Belarus Fedia@dragon.bas-net.by

arXiv:cs/0110067v1 [cs.CE] 31 Oct 2001

(April 26, 2017)

Abstract
The optimal planning trajectrory is analysed on the basis of the growth model
with effectiveness. The saving per capital value has to be rather high initially
with smooth decrement in the future years.

I. INTRODUCTION

For the development of the long-term economic strategy and for realization of appropriate investment policy one needs the theoretical model of economic growth. All developed
countries pay a considerable attention to researching of such theoretical models, as well as
to developing of corresponding instrumental means that are important for calculation of the
concrete prognoses and programs [1] .The practical experience, accumulated by many countries, demonstrates that the most effective tool for the development of strategic directions
of an economic policy on a long-run period are the special economic-mathematical models
of small dimension (macromodels). Such models are elaborated on the base of the theory of
economic growth [2].
In traditional macromodels the principal attention is payed to the estimation of future
dynamics of the investments that determine trajectories of the economic growth. However,
economic growth depends not only on scales of investment resources, enclosed in economics:
these trajectories are also determined by a number of the so-called quality factors [3]. Moreover, the final economic growth results depend basically on these factors.

1

The orientation of economy to the extensive growth by escalating of wide area investments
only cannot ensure an achievement of the useful final results without paying attention to
the quality factors. The history of development of many countries, including the former
USSR, shows the possibility of economical development by the principle of production for
the sake of production. Economical system absorbs huge investment resources and augments
volumetric parameters. Nevertheless this type of investment policy is not able to raise
essentially standards of living.
The limited prospects of the economic development on the base of only extensive factors
are demonstrated in the Solow model [4]. The estimation of influence of technical progress
is made on the basis of the Solow model with technical progress [2]. This model accounts
for the contribution of technical progress in the simplest way. It is based on the rather
relative concept of autonomous progress advance. The intensity of the autonomous progress
effect on production growth is completely determined by the time factor. A quantitative
estimations of such effect are received on the basis of the production functions method. The
parameters for this method are calculated by means of econometric processing of dynamic
rows that define change of production volumes. A row of successive numbering of time
periods (years, quarters or other periods) is used as a dynamic row, that corresponds to the
change of technical progress.
In essence another approach to define the quality factors contribution to the growth of
production volumes has been realized in growth model with effectiveness. This approach
does not use insecure parameters of rather relative econometric models. It is based on a direct
estimation of the change of an economic system material capabilities that are indispensable
for the realization of social purposes. The growth model with effectiveness is most adequate
for simulation of economic growth in the present economical situation for the Republic of
Belarus. The main purpose of this work is to formulate the optimal planning problem for
the growth model with effectiveness and solution of this problem: such solution is especially
important for researches of economic growth problems, because it answers the main question
that appears when choosing the investment policy. The essence of this question consists in
2

choosing between maintenance of current demand (consumption) and maintenance of the
future demand (capital investment). The solution of the optimal planning problem allows to
point such investment policy, at which the economic system works at best. The formulation
of the depends on the purposes that the economic system has. In this work one takes
the most realistic version of such purpose - maximization of the welfare integral which is
consumption per man during the modeled period of time.
The article is organized as follows: section II deals with the concept of production
effectiveness. Growth model with effectiveness is described in section III. In section IV one
considers optimal planning problem formulation. Maximum principle is applied in section
V. Solution of the optmal planning problem is analyzed in section VI. Policy options are
considered in section VII. Main achievements of this work are briefly concluded in section
VIII.

II. CONCEPT OF PRODUCTION EFFECTIVENESS

The growth model with effectiveness uses modern approach to predict the economic
growth trajectory and define the quality factors contribution in increasing of production
volumes. This approach does not rest on accident-sensitive parameters of rather conditional
econometric models, but it is grounded on the direct estimation of those changes of material
capabilities of an economical system that are necessary for realization of the chosen purposes.
On the basis of such estimation it is expedient to draw a conclusion about the advance,
reached in economics: one admits the existence of ”advance” only in the case, when the
capabilities for implementation of the social and economic purposes are extended. At the
same time, from the standpoint of the target approach, opening capabilities scales shows
the degree of the obtained advances.
Within the framework of such an approach there is a more successful name for the
identification of the advance, reached in economics. This name is ”increase of production
effectiveness” (or, accordingly, its reduction, if the capabilities for the implementation of
3

the social and economic purposes are reduced). This term is used in this work to reflect
all quality factors influence on economic growth . Thus, the primary task of this chapter
is to design a criteria index that should characterize change of production effectiveness on
the macrolevel. Such an index should be used as one of the most important variables of
the dynamic macromodel, which reflects the relationship of this macromodel with other
macroeconomic indexes that describe the intensity of production and use of resources, as far
as accumulation and non-productive consumption. Within the framework of the dynamical
macromodel of economical growth, the submodel of the production effectiveness has been
developed from the standpoint of the target approach [5]. The economical system under
consideration is supposed to be closed in the sense that the total amount of the needs is
fulfiled at the expense of the production only. The system does not move its production
into other countries in the debt or gratuitously (that does not eliminate barter with an
environment on the equivalent basis for the coordination of commodity pattern of production
with consumption pattern).
To define an effectiveness criterion of production it is necessary to reveal the certain
economical form of the operational outcome of the economical system and resources, used
for its achievement. For this purpose one needs to define not only spatial - organizational,
but also temporal boundaries of this system in order to reveal and to agree final output
indexes with the initial input factors involved in the process of production.
If we abstract from the natural and external economical factors and consider the effectiveness of an economical system, without taking into account its temporal boundaries, then
the labour force is the only used resource, and the amount of created material benefits and
services intended only for the non-productive consumption is the outcome of the system
operation. In this case it would be possible to define the effectiveness index on the basis
of the simple comparison of the total final consumption and used labour force. It is always
necessary to associate an estimation of effectiveness with the particular time frame, therefore
time also should play a role of the factor that limits the frameworks of the economical system. The inputs and outputs of the system reflect not the connection with the environment.
4

The evolution of the system depends on the past and defines the future evolution of the
system. The relations of the resources reproduction costs to their volumes are the relevant
characteristics of the reproduction process. For example the consumption per man ψ reflects
the level of workers material benefits. Any change of this index substantially determines the
dynamics of all indexes of the population welfare. The relation of gross investment S to a
volume of accumulated productive capital K
S
K

ω=

(1)

predetermines the rate of capital growth in a decisive measure. The estimations ψ and ω
are connected with the indexes of labour productivity p and capital per man r as follows
p = ψ + ω · r.

(2)

This ratio is a consequence of the balance identity Y = C + S, where Y - output, C - consumption, which originates from the assumption about closure of the considered economical
system (see fig.1).
To derive the equation (2) from the balance identity, one has to divide it by the labour
force volume L and take into consideration that
S
=
L

S
K

·

K
L

= ω · r.

(3)

Relative resource estimations ψ and ω can be accepted as objective functions that describe
the implementation degree of two main purposes of the reproductive process. These purposes
form one general purpose of an economical system. Here we denote it as ”integral purpose”.
It implies the maximization of satisfaction of current and future needs of society. The index
of effectiveness should serve as the objective function that permits to estimate quantitatively
the integral purpose implementation.
For the concrete definition of the integral purpose and the integral index of effectiveness it
is necessary to distribute the priorities between two introduced primary purposes. This distribution leads to their coordination and resolving of the contradiction between the primary
5

purposes. Such priorities are reflected quantitatively at distribution of the gross internal
product to parts intended for reproduction of two kinds of manufacturing resources. The
purposes of the society define the proportions of such distribution and concretize the effectiveness index formula that should serve as the integral object function of the reproduction
process.
Below all variables are counted for the given year. Here we assume that during t-th
year the usage of the manpower quantity Lt and capital of the volume Kt makes the gross
internal product of the volume Yt . The corresponding values of the relative indexes of labour
productivity and capital per man are peer pt and rt , respectively. The indexes pt and rt are
the most important quantitative characteristics of the process of reproduction as generalized
technology on the macrolevel. Though their values don’t determine base-line values of the
object functions ψt and ωt uniquely, but they limit the area of their possible values. In
accordance with the general limiting condition the above indicated main balance identity
reads
pt = ψt + ωt · rt .

(4)

The particular values of estimations ψt and ωt can be derived from the area, restricted by
the equality (4). This area depends on the distribution of the made gross internal product,
which arrests the norm of accumulation δt . The last is defined as the fraction of the gross
accumulation in the total amount of the gross internal product
δt =

St
.
Yt

(5)

At the given norm of accumulation and the certain labour productivity level as well as
capital per man, the values of object functions are determined uniquely according to the
formulas
ψt = (1 − δt ) · pt ,
ωt =

δt · pt
.
rt

6

(6)

Their values are the starting point for the analysis of the effectiveness dynamics.
Here we consider the values of variables for the next year t + 1. The capital per man
increases to the value of rt+1 . The labour productivity for the given capital per man reaches
the value pt+1 . The dynamics of the reproduction process effectiveness characterizes the
change of the implementation capabilities of two main purposes that have to be reflected in
the change of area of acceptable values of the object functions ω and ψ. In order to estimate
the degree of the indicated change quantitatively one needs to compare labour productivity
in current year with the value ψt + ωt · rt+1 , which describes that minimal production volume
per man. This allows to keep the values of the object functions ω
and ψ at the level of the basic year.
pt+1 = ψt + ωt · rt+1 .

(7)

The last corresponds to the equal effectiveness of production in current and basic years. It
means that the values of both object functions can be saved at a basic level and both can
not be increased at once. Note that actual values of estimations ω and ψ in one year t + 1
can differ from ψt and ωt , but one of them will be more basic, and another will be less.
Assume the labour productivity level in one year t + 1 surpasses the bound
pt+1 > ψt + ωt · rt+1 .
Therefore in this year there appears the possibility for simultaneous increase of values of
two object functions in contrast to the year t. As mentioned before these object functions
describe the level of implementation of the main purposes of the reproduction process. It
gives the ground to suppose that in one year t + 1 the value of the integral object function
is augmented and, therefore, the level of efficiency is raised. Moreover, the value of a
difference pt+1 − ψt − ωt · rt+1 allows to judge that there appeared capability to increase the
values of object functions ω. Therefore this difference can serve as the characteristic of the
effectiveness increase degree.
The actual increment of labour productivity ∆pt = pt+1 − pt can be decomposed in two
parts
7

∆1 = ψt + ωt · rt+1 − pt ,

(8)

∆2 = pt+1 − ψt − ωt · rt+1 .

(9)

The value ∆1 represents the increment of the labour productivity, at which the level of effectiveness remains invariable. It can also be interpreted as the increment of theproductivity
reached at the expense of the extensive increase of the capital per man (at the basic level
of the effectiveness ). Another part of the increment of labour productivity ∆2 quantitatively characterizes the additional capabilities of implementation of the main purposes of
production appeared in one year t + 1. We start from the reason that the growth of the
effectiveness is the only source of increase of such capabilities. Therefore it is possible to
consider the value ∆2 as the increment of the productivity reached at the expense of the
increase of efficiency. The ratio of the increment ∆2 to the base-line value of the labour
productivity
∆2
pt+1 − ψt − ωt · rt+1
=
.
pt
pt

(10)

represents the rate of the productivity increment at the expense of the effectiveness increase.
This ratio can be identified with the rate of the increment of the effectiveness of production.
In equation (10) we replace pt+1 with pt + ∆pt and rt+1 with rt + ∆rt and simplify it
using the balance identity (2). The rate of the increment of effectiveness depends on the
pure increments of the labour productivity ∆pt and capital per man ∆rt
pt+1 − ψt − ωt · rt+1
∆2
=
.
pt
pt

(11)

The equation (11) can be rewritten using the absolute increases of the corresponding indexes
to the rates of their change. For this purpose one substitutes the intensity of reproduction
of the capital from the formula (6) into equation (11):
δt · pt
1
· ∆rt
iϕ = · ∆pt −
pt
rt
∆rt
∆pt
− δt ·
.
=
pt
rt
8

!

Here we introduce the notations for rates of increment of the corresponding indexes iP =
and ir =

∆rt
.
rt

∆pt
pt

Then the estimation of dynamics of a production effectiveness takes the form
iϕ = ip − δ · ir

(12)

Thus, the conducted analysis results in a conclusion that the reference point for the
society that seeks to achieve the social and economic purposes, can’t serve the increase of
labour productivity, which traditionally was considered to be the main criteria index in our
economics. The obtained two equivalent dynamical formulas of the index of a production
effectiveness (11) and (12) demonstrate that for the estimation of outcomes of the economical
development it is necessary to correct the growth of labour productivity allowing for the
change of the capital per man. The bigger part of the made gross internal product is routed
to the reproduction of the productive capital, the more is the deviation of the dynamics of
the criteria index of effectiveness from dynamics of labour productivity. The last can serve
as the main reference point of control only in that case, when the capital per man remains
invariable. In this work we consider the usage of the effectiveness index as the preferred
reference point of control.

III. GROWTH MODEL WITH EFFECTIVENESS

The following six main macroeconomic indexes have been selected as variables of the
Growth model with effectiveness r - capital per man, p - output per man, ψ - consumption
per man, ω - saving per capital, λ - sum of amortization rate and population rate, iϕ - the
rate of economics effectiveness.
For simplification of model and its analysis the following preconditions are adopted: the
number of workers in economics changes with constant rate of increment n, (so that the
dynamics of employment can be recorded with the help of the function L = L0 · ent ). The
amortization rate β is also invariable. Besides the differential form of notation is used.
This form is more convenient for solution and analysis and widely used in the literature on
9

economic-mathematical modeling [5]. For conversion to the differential form one supposes,
that the values of the considered economical indexes are continuously differentiable functions
of time. The increments of indexes per unit of time, selected as a step for the analysis, are
substituted by derivative from functions that describe their dynamics.
The main equation of the model is based on the definition of the effectiveness index. The
formula (11), derived earlier for the estimation of dynamics of effectiveness and introduced in
the incremental form, can be converted to the following equivalent equation in the differential
form
ṗ(t) = iϕ (t) · p(t) + ω(t) · ṙ(t).

(13)

The differential equation (13) is included in the developed macroeconomic model and plays
the role of production function, which links indexes of capital per man and labour productivity. Besides, the model includes the main balance identity (2)
p(t) = ψ(t) + ω(t) · r(t).

(14)

The ratio (6) can be rewritten in differential form as follows
ω(t) · r(t) = δ(t) · p(t).

(15)

The differential equation for r comes from the equation of capital dinamics
dK = S(t) − β · K(t).

(16)

To pass from the increment of capital to the index of the increment of capital per man, it is
necessary to differentiate the formula for capital per man
!

K(t)
dr = d
L(t)
dK · L(t) − K(t) · dL
=
L(t)2
K(t) dL
dK
−
·
.
=
L(t)
L(t) L(t)
10

(17)

Here we introduce the population rate n =

dL(t)
.
L(t)

The last assumption allows to rewrite

equation (17) in the following form:
S(t) − β · K(t)
− n · r(t)
L(t)
S(t)
=
− (β + n) · r(t).
L(t)

dr =

Now in (18) instead of

S(t)
L(t)

(18)

we put equivalent expression from (3), and for the sum of two

constants n + β we enter new identification λ = n + β. Then it is possible to enter into the
model the equation, that reflects the correlation between capital per man and saving per
capital.
ṙ(t) = (ω(t) − λ) · r(t).

(19)

Equations (13) - (15) and (19) form the set of four equations, which describes the correlations
between six abovelisted main macroeconomic indexes.

IV. OPTIMAL PLANNING PROBLEM FORMULATION

It is nessesary to emphasize that this model is represented by six variables and four
equations. Therefore, the obtained set of equations (13)-(15),(19) is incomplete. In order to
close the set of equations one introduces control variables that describe investment policy.
It is possible to do by assuming iϕ = const and ω(t) is a control variable. Then one can
formulate optimal planning problem. First, it is necessary to construct a target functional.
The task of the central planning establishment is to select a feasible trajectory ω(t) that
is the optimum for achievement of some economic target. The economic target of central
planning organ should be based on the standards of living, estimated by the consumption
level. In particular, it is presumed that the central planning organ has an utility function,
which determines utility U at any moment of time as a function of consumption per man
U = U[ψ(t)]. We assume that the utility function is doubly differentiable and that the
marginal utility is positive and non-increasing function. Therefore, the utility function is
11

concave and monotonically increasing function. The utility function determines utility in
a certain year. However, the problem of the central planning organ is to select the whole
trajectory of consumption per man. For this purpose it is necessary to compare indexes of
utility that correspond to different years. Suppose, that utilities in different years do not
depend on each other. The utility in any year does not depend on either consumption or
utility in any other year directly. Utilities for different years are supposed to be additive.
This assumption is based on the fact, that the proximate consumption is more important,
than distant. We suppose that the norm of discounting d is constant and positive. The
bigger norm of discounting testifies the greater preference of the utilities closest in time.
Suspecting the exponential behavior of the discounting, we receive the value of utility in
year t equal to e−d(t−t0 ) U[ψ(t)]. During the indicated time period from t0 to t1 the welfare
W , corresponding to the pathway of consumption per man ψ(t), is determined by integrating
of all instantaneous utilities over the whole interval. The time planning horizon t1 can be
finite or infinite. In case this time is finite, it is necessary to set the minimally acceptable
value of capital per man in final year to ensure the possibility of consumption outside the
given horizon of time. Here we try to avoid difficulties, connected with the definition of the
minimal value of capital per man in a final moment of time. Consider, that t1 is indefinite,
so the control trajectory is selected for all times in the future.
However, in this case the welfare integral can miss. The convergence of an integral is
guaranteed, if the following conditions are satisfied: the initial value of capital per man is
less than the maximal accessible level k̃ and the norm of discounting is positive. In this case
c(t) ≤ f (k̃) and
Z∞

t0

−d(t−t0 )

e

U(ψ(t))dt ≤

Z∞

e−d(t−t0 ) U(f (k̃))dt =

t0

U(f (k̃))
.
d

(20)

So the integral of welfare is bounded above.
We choose r(t) and p(t) as state variables. We express consumption per man through
control and state variables from (14). Then we receive optimal planning problem for model
with effectiveness
12

W =

Z∞

e−d·t U(p − ω · r)dt → max,
ω(t)

0

ṙ = (ω − λ)r,
ṗ = piϕ + ω(ω − λ) · r,
r(0) = r0 ,
p(0) = p0 .

(21)

V. APPLYING OF THE MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE

In this section we derive the equation for the saving per capital trajectory. When solving
optimal planning problems with the help of the Maximum principle, for each coordinate of
state variables vector x a costate variable is used. The Hamiltonian function is H(x, y, u, t) =
I(x, u, t)+yf (x, u, t), where I(x, u, t) stands for the integrand of a target functional, f (x, u, t)
for the vector of motion equations right parts, u for control. We find functions u(t), x(t),
y(t) that satisfy the following conditions
max H(x, u, y, t), t0 ≤ t,

(22)

u

∂H
, x(t0 ) = x0 ,
∂y
∂H
,
ẏ = −
∂x

(23)

ẋ =

(24)

H = e−d(t−t0 ) U(p − ω · r) + yr (ω − λ)r + yp [piϕ + ω(ω − λ)r] .

(25)

where yr , yp are costate variables. Finally, by using of Eqs. (22) - (24) we can write the
problem to be solved in the following form
0 = −e−d·t U ′ (p − ωr) + yr + 2yp ω − yp λ,

(26)

ṙ = (ω − λ)r,

(27)

ṗ = piϕ + ω(ω − λ)r,

(28)

ẏr = ω · e−d·t U ′ (p − ω · r) − yr (ω − λ) − yp ω(ω − λ),

(29)

ẏp = −e−d·t U ′ (p − ω · r) − yp iϕ .

(30)

13

The system of five equations with five unknown functions is then obtained. Four equations
of this system are differential, one is algebraic. Solution of this system of equations is
equivalent to the solution of the problem (21).
The set of equations (26) - (30) has the solution for any kind of the utility function.
However in this work we perform the analysis of the elementary case U(z) = z. In this case
Eqs. (29) and (30) for costate variables yr and yp do not depend on state ones r and p. In
order to find an optimal savings trajectory ω(t) we have to solve only three equations (26),
(29), and (30). After that one can find state variables r and p. As a first step we obtain
from Eq. (26) an explicit formula for ω(t) written as a function of costate variables yr and
yp :
ω=

λ χ − yr
,
+
2
2yp

(31)

where χ = exp(−dt) is an exponential function. Note, that the solution of eq.(30) for yp can
be written in the analytical form
yp (t) = yp (0)e−µ·t +

1
(e−µ·t − e−d·t ),
µ−d

(32)

where µ = iϕ . Having differentiated the left and right parts of eq. (31), one arrives at
ω̇ = −

1 (ẏr − χ̇)yp − (yr − χ)ẏp
.
2
yp2

(33)

By rewriting Eq. (31) in the following form
yr − χ
= λ − 2ω.
yp

(34)

and substituting it in the right part of Eq. (33), we find
ω̇ = −

1 (ẏr − χ̇) 1 ẏp
+
(λ − 2ω).
2 yp
2 yp

(35)

Then we replace ẏr and ẏp in the right part of eq. (29) and (30) respectively with the
intermediate result
ω̇ = −

1 [ωχ − yr (ω − λ) − yp ω(ω − λ) − χ] 1 (−χ − yp µ)
+
(λ − 2ω).
2
yp
2
yp
14

(36)

Finally, we substitute the ratio of costate variables
yr
χ
= λ − 2ω + .
yp
yp

(37)

found from Eq. (34) in the equation (36) and obtain the following differential equation for
saving per capital
1
χ
λ2 (2λ + d)χ µλ
ω̇ = − ω 2 + (µ + λ + )ω −
−
−
.
2
yp
2
2yp
2

(38)

Found equation together with Eq. (32) is equivalent to the optimal planning problem (21).
Solution of this equation gives an optimal savings trajectory ω(t).

VI. OPTIMAL SAVINGS TRAJECTORY

The differential linear equation (38) is Riccati equation which can be solved by standard
methods.. For the parameters values µ = 0.015, d = 0.2 (corresponding to decreasing
significance of consumption in e times for 5 years), λ = 0.02, and the initial value ω(0) = 0.05,
the solution of the Riccati equation (38) has been found numerically by the Runge-Kutta
method. The obtained solution is shown in figure 2.
The equation (38) enables analytical consideration in the asymptotic limit when
exp(−(d − µ)t) → 0, i.e. when d > µ and t >> 1/(d − µ). In this case we can neglect
those terms in Eq. (38) proportional to χ/yp with a result
λ(λ + µ)
1
3
= − (ω − ω− )(ω − ω+ ),
ω̇ = − ω 2 + µω −
2
2
2

(39)

q

where ω± = (λ+µ)± µ(λ + µ). Note, that this equation is known as equation of interacting
masses. Having integrated it we obtain an asymptotic optimal trajectory
ω(t) =

q

ω− exp (−t µ(λ + µ)) + cω+
q

exp (−t µ(λ + µ)) + c

(40)

where the constant c is defined by the values ω± and the value of ω(t∞ ) = ω∞ taken as
“initial” value for the asymptotic regime of evolution
15

c = (ω∞ − ω− )(ω+ − ω∞ ).
As it follows from obtained solution an asymptotic trajectory will be slightly increased if
ω− < ω∞ < ω+ , being restricted by the value of ω+ = (λ + µ) +

q

µ(λ + µ). An asymptotic

behavior of state variable r is obtained from Eq. (27) by taking into account Eq. (40)
r = r̃ exp ((µ +



q

q

µ(λ + µ))t) exp ((− µ(λ + µ))t) + c

2

,

(41)

where r̃ is a rate-fixing constant.

VII. POLICY OPTIONS

There are two main applications of this analysis : recommendations to the government for
investment policy development and prediction of a long-run period macroeconomic system
development.
To define recommended investment volume in the current year, we need to obtain the
stock of capital statistical data for this year and to find the optimal saving per capital value
using the optimal planning problem solution. Then we can evaluate the investment volume
as a product of K and ω. The next year we change the optimal planning problem parameters
to improve the accuracy of calculation. The procedure of recommended investment volume
evaluation remains invariable. Thus this method allows the optimization of the investment
policy during any period of time.
Variables from economic growth models play important role in models of other important
fields of economic life too. A financial programming method combines these models . The
optimal planning problem for the model with effectiveness can serve as a part of financial
programming systems [7]. The solution of the optimal planning problem may be useful for
evaluating financial programming system parameters.
To predict long-run period macroeconomic system development we put optimal saving per capital trajectory into the growth model with effectiveness and then calculate all
macroeconomic variables from this model. Table 1 shows predictions based on the Republic
16

of Belarus economic parameters. Optimal saving per capital trajectory for this model is the
result of the optimal planning problem solution from this work.
Table 1 shows that this variant of macroeconomic strategy allows the extension of productivity potential by increasing the capital per man by 72.4 % and the output per man by
55.5 %. The total growth of consumption per man is 51.6 %.

VIII. CONCLUSIONS

The main result of this article is the optimal investment trajectory for Belarus for the
period of 2000-2020. The number of additional results may be of use for the investment
policy development in other countries and other periods. The nonlinear system of equations
allows to analyze dependencies between trajectories of main macroeconomic variables. The
asymptotic solution shows long-run perspectives of macroeconomic system. Equation from
this work may be used in financial programming systems.
A possible improvment of the present model is connected with the splitting of capital
in two parts - private industrial capital and public overhead capital. Besides, a more realistic utility function can be chosen for the model. The results of the inprovements will be
published elsewhere.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Useful advises of professor Komkov are gratefully acknowledged.

17

REFERENCES
[1] Gotz Uebe, World of Economic Models., Avebury,1997.
[2] Solow R.M., Growth Theory., Oxford, 2000.
[3] Solow R.M., Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function, Rewiew of Economics and Statistics,39(1957),312-320.
[4] Solow R.M., A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, Quarterly Journal of
Economics, 70(1956),65-94.
[5] Komkov V.N., Investment process modeling methods.// Belarus investment policy (analisys, problems, suggestions). Minsk 1996 , 98-134.
[6] Solow R.M., Perspectives on Growth Theory, Journal of Economic Perspectives,
8(1994),45-54.
[7] Komkov V.N., Financial Programming., Minsk 1999.

18

FIGURES
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the production process
FIG. 2. Numerical solution of the optimal planning differential equation. Parameters represent
the economy of Belarus. Numerical solution shows that the saving per capital ratio has to be rather
high initially with smooth decrement in future years. This is the main result of this work

19

TABLES
TABLE I. Republic of Belarus economic development variant, when the effectiveness rate is
1.5%
Year

Capital per man

Consumption per man

Output per man

Savings per capital

value

value

value

value

rate %

rate %

111,0

rate %

150

rate %

2000

780

2001

803,6

103,0

113,3

102,1

153,5

102,3

0,049

99,3

2002

827,7

106,1

115,6

104,1

157,0

104,6

0,048

98,6

2003

852,1

109,2

118,0

106,3

160,6

107,0

0,047

98,0

2004

877,1

112,4

120,4

108,5

164,2

109,5

0,046

97,4

2005

902,4

115,7

122,9

110,7

167,9

112,0

0,046

96,8

2006

928,3

119,0

125,5

113,0

171,7

114,5

0,045

96,2

2007

954,6

122,4

128,1

115,4

175,6

117,1

0,045

95,6

2008

981,4

125,8

130,8

117,8

179,5

119,7

0,044

95,1

2009

1008,7

129,3

133,5

120,3

183,6

122,4

0,044

94,6

2010

1036,5

132,9

136,3

122,8

187,6

125,1

0,043

94,1

2011

1064,8

136,5

139,2

125,4

191,8

127,9

0,043

93,7

2012

1093,7

140,2

142,1

128,0

196,1

130,7

0,042

93,2

2013

1123,0

144,0

145,1

130,7

200,4

133,6

0,042

92,8

2014

1153,0

147,8

148,2

133,5

204,8

136,6

0,041

92,4

2015

1183,5

151,7

151,3

136,3

209,4

139,6

0,041

92,0

2016

1214,5

155,7

154,6

139,2

214,0

142,6

0,040

91,6

2017

1246,1

159,8

157,9

142,2

218,6

145,8

0,040

91,2

2018

1278,4

163,9

161,2

145,3

223,4

149,0

0,040

90,9

2019

1311,2

168,1

164,7

148,4

228,3

152,2

0,039

90,5

2020

1344,6

172,4

168,3

151,6

233,3

155,5

0,039

90,2

20

0,050

6
.
/

3URGXFWLRQ
3URFHVV

<
&

)LJXUH
)HGRU6.LOLQ$QDO\VLVRI,QYHVWPHQW3ROLF\LQ%HODUXV

2SWLPDO6DYLQJV7UDMHFWRU\w(t)


























7LPHW\HDUV

)LJXUH
)HGRU6.LOLQ$QDO\VLVRI,QYHVWPHQW3ROLF\LQ%HODUXV

