Open3D: A Modern Library for 3D Data Processing
Qian-Yi Zhou

Jaesik Park
Intel Labs

arXiv:1801.09847v1 [cs.CV] 30 Jan 2018

Abstract

Vladlen Koltun

ing practices.
Open3D was created to address this need. It is an opensource library that supports rapid development of software
that deals with 3D data. The Open3D frontend exposes a set
of carefully selected data structures and algorithms in both
C++ and Python. The Open3D backend is implemented in
C++11, is highly optimized, and is set up for OpenMP parallelization. Open3D was developed from a clean slate with
a small and carefully considered set of dependencies. It can
be set up on different platforms and compiled from source
with minimal effort. The code is clean, consistently styled,
and maintained via a clear code review mechanism.
Open3D has been in development since 2015 and has
been used in a number of published research projects [22,
13, 15, 12]. It has been deployed and is currently running
in the Tanks and Temples evaluation server [13].
Open3D is released open-source under the permissive
MIT license and is available at http://www.open3d.
org. We welcome contributions from the open-source
community.

Open3D is an open-source library that supports rapid
development of software that deals with 3D data. The
Open3D frontend exposes a set of carefully selected data
structures and algorithms in both C++ and Python. The
backend is highly optimized and is set up for parallelization.
Open3D was developed from a clean slate with a small and
carefully considered set of dependencies. It can be set up
on different platforms and compiled from source with minimal effort. The code is clean, consistently styled, and maintained via a clear code review mechanism. Open3D has
been used in a number of published research projects and
is actively deployed in the cloud. We welcome contributions
from the open-source community.

1. Introduction
The world is three-dimensional. Systems that operate in
the physical world or deal with its simulation must often
process three-dimensional data. Such data takes the form
of point clouds, meshes, and other representations. Data in
this form is produced by sensors such as LiDAR and depth
cameras, and by software systems that support 3D reconstruction and modeling.
Despite the central role of 3D data in fields such as
robotics and computer graphics, writing software that processes such data is quite laborious in comparison to other
data types. For example, an image can be efficiently loaded
and visualized with a few lines of OpenCV code [3]. A similarly easy to use software framework for 3D data has not
emerged. A notable prior effort is the Point Cloud Library
(PCL) [18]. Unfortunately, after an initial influx of opensource contributions, PCL became encumbered by bloat and
is now largely dormant. Other open-source efforts include
MeshLab [6], which provides a graphical user interface for
processing meshes; libigl [11], which supports discrete differential geometry and related research; and a variety of solutions for image-based reconstruction [13]. Nevertheless,
there is currently no open-source library that is fast, easy to
use, supports common 3D data processing workflows, and
is developed in accordance with modern software engineer-

2. Design
Two primary design principles of Open3D are usefulness
and ease of use [8]. Our key decisions can be traced to
these two principles. Usefulness motivated support for popular representations, algorithms, and platforms. Ease of use
served as a countervailing force that guarded against heavyweight dependencies and feature creep.
Open3D provides data structures for three kinds of representations: point clouds, meshes, and RGB-D images. For
each representation, we have implemented a complete set
of basic processing algorithms such as I/O, sampling, visualization, and data conversion. In addition, we have implemented a collection of widely used algorithms, such as normal estimation [16], ICP registration [2, 4], and volumetric integration [7]. We have verified that the functionality
of Open3D is sufficient by using it to implement complete
workflows such as large-scale scene reconstruction [5, 15].
We carefully chose a small set of lightweight dependencies, including Eigen for linear algebra [9], GLFW
for OpenGL window support, and FLANN for fast nearest neighbor search [14]. For easy compilation, powerful
1

but heavyweight libraries such as Boost and Ceres are excluded. Instead we use either lightweight alternatives (e.g.,
pybind11 instead of Boost.Python) or in-house implementations (e.g., for Gauss-Newton and Levenberg-Marquardt
graph optimization). The source code of all dependencies is
distributed as part of Open3D. The dependencies can thus
be compiled from source if not automatically detected by
the configuration script. This is particularly useful for compilation on operating systems that lack package management software, such as Microsoft Windows.
The development of Open3D started from a clean slate
and the library is kept as simple as possible. Only algorithms that solve a problem of broad interest are added.
If a problem has multiple solutions, we choose one that
the community considers standard. A new algorithm is
added only if its implementation demonstrates significantly
stronger results on a well-known benchmark.
Open3D is written in standard C++11 and uses CMake
to support common C++ toolchains including

memory access to these data fields via a numpy array. The
following code sample demonstrates reading and accessing
the point coordinates of a point cloud.
from py3d import *
import numpy as np
pointcloud = read_point_cloud(’pointcloud.ply’)
print(np.asarray(pointcloud.points))

Similarly, TriangleMesh has two master data fields –
TriangleMesh.vertices and TriangleMesh.triangles –
as well as three auxiliary data fields:
TrianTriangleMesh.vertex colors,
gleMesh.vertex normals,
and TriangleMesh.triangle normals.
The Image data structure is implemented as a 2D or 3D
array and can be directly converted to a numpy array. A
pair of depth and color images of the same resolution can be
combined into a data structure named RGBDImage. Since
there is no standard depth image format, we have implemented depth image support for multiple datasets including
NYU [19], TUM [20], SUN3D [21], and Redwood [5]. The
following code sample reads a pair of RGB-D images from
the TUM dataset and converts them to a point cloud.

• GCC 4.8 and later on Linux

• XCode 8.0 and later on OS X

• Visual Studio 2015 and later on Windows

from py3d import *
import numpy as np
depth = read_image(’TUM_depth.png’)
color = read_image(’TUM_color.jpg’)
rgbd = create_rgbd_image_from_tum_format(color,
depth)
pointcloud = create_point_cloud_from_rgbd_image(
rgbd, PinholeCameraIntrinsic.
prime_sense_default)

A key feature of Open3D is ubiquitous Python binding.
We follow the practice of successful computer vision and
deep learning libraries [1, 3]: the backend is implemented in
C++ and is exposed through frontend interfaces in Python.
Developers use Python as a glue language to assemble components implemented in the backend.
Figure 1 shows code snippets for a simple 3D data processing workflow. An implementation using the Open3D
Python interface is compared to an implementation using the Open3D C++ interface and to an implementation
based on PCL [18]. The implementation using the Open3D
Python interface is approximately half the length of the implementation using the Open3D C++ interface, and about
five times shorter than the implementation based on PCL.
As an added benefit, the Python code can be edited and debugged interactively in a Jupyter Notebook.

3.2. Visualization
Open3D provides a function draw geometries() for visualization. It takes a list of geometries as input, creates a window, and renders them simultaneously using OpenGL. We
have implemented many functions in the visualizer, such
as rotation, translation, and scaling via mouse operations,
changing rendering style, and screen capture. A code sample using draw geometries() and its result are shown in Figure 2.
In addition to draw geometries(), Open3D has a
number of sibling functions with more advanced functionality.
draw geometries with custom animation()
allows the programmer to define a custom view
trajectory and play an animation in the GUI.
draw geometries with animation callback()
and
draw geometries with key callback()
accept
Python
callback functions as input. The callback function is called
in an automatic animation loop, or upon a key press event.
The following code sample shows a rotating point cloud
using draw geometries with animation callback().

3. Functionality
Open3D has nine modules, listed in Table 1.

3.1. Data
The Geometry module implements three geometric representations: PointCloud, TriangleMesh, and Image.
The PointCloud data structure has three data fields:
PointCloud.points, PointCloud.normals, PointCloud.colors.
They are used to store coordinates, normals, and colors. The
master data field is PointCloud.points. The other two fields
are considered valid only when they have the same number
of records as PointCloud.points. Open3D provides direct
2

Estimate
normal

Downsample

(a) A simple 3D data processing task: load a point cloud, downsample it, and estimate normals.
from py3d import *
pointcloud = read_point_cloud(’pointcloud.ply’)
downsampled = voxel_down_sample(pointcloud, voxel_size = 0.05)
estimate_normals(downsampled, KDTreeSearchParamHybrid(radius = 0.1, max_nn = 30))
draw_geometries([downsampled])

(b) An implementation using the Open3D Python interface.
#include <Core/Core.h>
#include <IO/IO.h>
#include <Visualization/Visualization.h>
void main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
using namespace three;
auto pointcloud = CreatePointCloudFromFile(argv[1]);
auto downsampled = VoxelDownSample(pointcloud, 0.05)
EstimateNormals(*downsampled, KDTreeSearchParamHybrid(0.1, 30));
DrawGeometry(downsampled);
}

(c) An implementation using the Open3D C++ interface.
#include <pcl/point_types.h>
#include <pcl/point_cloud.h>
#include <pcl/features/normal_3d.h>
#include <pcl/filters/voxel_grid.h>
#include <pcl/io/pcd_io.h>
#include <pcl/visualization/cloud_viewer.h>
void main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
using namespace pcl;
PointCloud<PointNormal>::Ptr pcd(new PointCloud<PointNormal>());
io::loadPCDFile<PointNormal>(argv[1], *pcd);
VoxelGrid<PointNormal> grid;
grid.setLeafSize(0.05, 0.05, 0.05);
grid.setInputCloud(pcd);
grid.filter(*pcd);
PointCloud<PointNormal>::Ptr result(new PointCloud<PointNormal>());
NormalEstimation<PointNormal, PointNormal> est;
est.setInputCloud(pcd);
est.setRadiusSearch(0.1);
est.compute(*result);
pcl::visualization::PCLVisualizer viewer("PCL Viewer");
viewer.addPointCloudNormals<PointNormal, PointNormal>(pcd, result, 1, 0.05);
while (!viewer.wasStopped())
{
viewer.spinOnce();
}
}

(d) An implementation based on PCL.

Figure 1: Code snippets for a simple 3D data processing workflow. (a) An illustration of the task. (b) An implementation
using the Open3D Python interface. (b) An implementation using the Open3D C++ interface. (c) An implementation based on
PCL [18]. The implementation using the Open3D Python interface is dramatically shorter and clearer than the implementation
based on PCL.
3

Module

Functionality

Geometry
Camera
Odometry
Registration
Integration
I/O
Visualization
Utility
Python

Data structures and basic processing algorithms
Camera model and camera trajectory
Tracking and alignment of RGB-D images
Global and local registration
Volumetric integration
Reading and writing 3D data files
A customizable GUI for rendering 3D data with OpenGL
Helper functions such as console output, file system, and Eigen wrappers
Open3D Python binding and tutorials

Table 1: Open3D modules.
from py3d import *
pointcloud = read_point_cloud(’pointcloud.pcd’)
mesh = read_triangle_mesh(’mesh.ply’)
mesh.computer_vertex_normals()
draw_geometries([pointcloud, mesh])

from py3d import *
source = read_point_cloud(’source.pcd’)
target = read_point_cloud(’target.pcd’)
source_down = voxel_down_sample(source, 0.05)
target_down = voxel_down_sample(target, 0.05)
estimate_normals(source_down,
KDTreeSearchParamHybrid(radius = 0.1, max_nn
= 30))
estimate_normals(target_down,
KDTreeSearchParamHybrid(radius = 0.1, max_nn
= 30))

We then compute FPFH features and apply a RANSACbased global registration algorithm [17]:

Figure 2: Visualize a mesh and a point cloud using
draw geometries().

source_fpfh = compute_fpfh_feature(source_down,
KDTreeSearchParamHybrid(radius = 0.25, max_nn
= 100))
target_fpfh = compute_fpfh_feature(target_down,
KDTreeSearchParamHybrid(radius = 0.25, max_nn
= 100))
result_ransac =
registration_ransac_based_on_feature_matching
(source_down, target_down, source_fpfh,
target_fpfh, max_correspondence_distance =
0.075, TransformationEstimationPointToPoint(
False), ransac_n = 4, [
CorrespondenceCheckerBasedOnEdgeLength(0.9),
CorrespondenceCheckerBasedOnDistance(0.075)],
RANSACConvergenceCriteria(max_iteration =
4000000, max_validation = 500))

from py3d import *
pointcloud = read_point_cloud(’pointcloud.pcd’)
def rotate_view(vis):
# Rotate the view by 10 degrees
ctr = vis.get_view_control()
ctr.rotate(10.0, 0.0)
return False
draw_geometries_with_animation_callback([
pointcloud], rotate_view)

In the backend of Open3D, these functions are implemented using the Visualizer class. This class is also exposed
in the Python interface.

We used profiling tools to analyze the RANSAC-based
algorithm and found that its most time-consuming part is
the validation of matching results. Thus, we give the user an
option to specify a termination criterion via the RANSACConvergenceCriteria parameter. In addition, we provide
a set of functions that prune false matches early, including CorrespondenceCheckerBasedOnEdgeLength and CorrespondenceCheckerBasedOnDistance.
The final part of the pairwise registration workflow is
ICP refinement [2, 4], applied to the original dense point
clouds:

3.3. Registration
Open3D provides implementations of multiple stateof-the-art surface registration methods, including pairwise
global registration, pairwise local refinement, and multiway
registration using pose graph optimization. This section
gives an example of a complete pairwise registration workflow for point clouds. The workflow begins by reading raw
point clouds, downsampling them, and estimating normals:

4

result_icp = registration_icp(source, target,
max_correspondence_distance = 0.02,
result_ransac.transformation,
TransformationEstimationPointToPlane())

Here TransformationEstimationPointToPlane() invokes
a point-to-plane ICP algorithm. Other ICP variants are implemented as well. Intermediate and final results of the
demonstrated registration procedure are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 4: A scene reconstructed and visualized in Open3D.

Global registration

analysis accelerated the running time of many functions by
multiplicative factors. For example, our optimized implementation of the ICP algorithm is up to 25 times faster than
its counterpart in PCL [18]. Our implementation of the reconstruction pipeline of Choi et al. [5] is up to an order of
magnitude faster than the original implementation released
by the authors.
A large number of functions are parallelized with
OpenMP. Many functions, such as normal estimation, can
be easily parallelized across data samples using “#pragma
omp for” declarations. Another example of consequential
parallelization can be found in our non-linear least-squares
solvers. These functions optimize objectives of the form
X
L(x) =
ri2 (x),
(1)

Local refinement

Figure 3: Intermediate and final results of pairwise registration.

3.4. Reconstruction
A sophisticated workflow that is demonstrated in an
Open3D tutorial is a complete scene reconstruction system [5, 15]. The system is implemented as a Python script
that uses many algorithms implemented in Open3D. It takes
an RGB-D sequence as input and proceeds through three
major steps.

i

1. Build local geometric surfaces {Pi } (referred to as
fragments) from short subsequences of the input
RGB-D sequence. There are three substeps: matching
pairs of RGB-D images, robust pose graph optimization, and volumetric integration.

where ri (x) is a residual term. A step in a Gauss-Newton
solver takes the current solution xk and updates it to
−1 >
xk+1 = xk − (J>
(Jr r),
r Jr )

2. Globally align the fragments to obtain fragment poses
{Ti } and a camera calibration function C(·). There are
four substeps: global registration between fragment
pairs, robust pose graph optimization, ICP registration,
and global non-rigid alignment.

(2)

where Jr is the Jacobian matrix for the residual vector r,
both evaluated at xk . In the Open3D implementation, the
most time-consuming part is the evaluation of J>
r Jr and
J>
r.
These
were
parallelized
using
OpenMP
reduction.
r
A lambda function specifies the computation of J>
r Jr and
r
for
each
data
record.
This
lambda
function
is
called in
J>
r
a reduction loop that sums over the matrices.
The parallelization of the Open3D backend accelerated
the most time-consuming Open3D functions by a factor of
3-6 on a modern CPU.

3. Integrate RGB-D images to generate a mesh model for
the scene.
Figure 4 shows a reconstruction produced by this pipeline
for a scene from the SceneNN dataset [10]. The visualization was also done via Open3D.

5. Release

4. Optimization

Open3D is released open-source under the permissive
MIT license and is available at http://www.open3d.
org. Ongoing development is coordinated via GitHub.
Code changes are integrated via the following steps.

Open3D was engineered for high performance. We have
optimized the C++ backend such that Open3D implementations are generally faster than their counterparts in other 3D
processing libraries. For each major function, we used profiling tools to benchmark the execution of key steps. This

1. An issue is opened for a feature request or a bug fix.
5

2. A developer starts a new branch on a personal fork of
Open3D, writes code, and submits a pull request when
ready.

[9] G. Guennebaud, B. Jacob, et al. Eigen v3, 2010.
[10] B. Hua, Q. Pham, D. T. Nguyen, M. Tran, L. Yu, and
S. Yeung. SceneNN: A scene meshes dataset with annotations. In 3DV, 2016.

3. The code change is reviewed and discussed in the
pull request. Modifications are made to address issues
raised in the discussion.

[11] A. Jacobson, D. Panozzo, et al. libigl: A simple C++
geometry processing library, 2016.

4. One of the admins merges the pull request to the master
branch and closes the issue.

[12] M. Khoury, Q.-Y. Zhou, and V. Koltun. Learning compact geometric features. In ICCV, 2017.

The code review process maintains a consistent coding
style and adherence to modern C++ programming guidelines. Pull requests are automatically checked by a continuous integration service.
We hope that Open3D will be useful to a broad community of developers who deal with 3D data.

[13] A. Knapitsch, J. Park, Q. Zhou, and V. Koltun. Tanks
and temples: Benchmarking large-scale scene reconstruction. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 36(4),
2017.
[14] M. Muja and D. G. Lowe. Scalable nearest neighbor
algorithms for high dimensional data. PAMI, 36(11),
2014.

References

[15] J. Park, Q.-Y. Zhou, and V. Koltun. Colored point
cloud registration revisited. In ICCV, 2017.

[1] M. Abadi, P. Barham, J. Chen, Z. Chen, A. Davis,
J. Dean, et al. TensorFlow: A system for large-scale
machine learning. In OSDI, 2016.
[2] P. J. Besl and N. D. McKay. A method for registration
of 3-D shapes. PAMI, 14(2), 1992.
[3] G. Bradski. The OpenCV library. Dr. Dobb’s Journal,
25(11), 2000.
[4] Y. Chen and G. G. Medioni. Object modelling by registration of multiple range images. Image and Vision
Computing, 10(3), 1992.
[5] S. Choi, Q.-Y. Zhou, and V. Koltun. Robust reconstruction of indoor scenes. In CVPR, 2015.
[6] P. Cignoni, M. Callieri, M. Corsini, M. Dellepiane,
F. Ganovelli, and G. Ranzuglia. MeshLab: An opensource mesh processing tool. In Eurographics Italian
Chapter Conference, 2008.
[7] B. Curless and M. Levoy. A volumetric method for
building complex models from range images. In SIGGRAPH, 1996.
[8] F. D. Davis. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of
use, and user acceptance of information technology.
MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 1989.

[16] M. Pauly. Point primitives for interactive modeling
and processing of 3D geometry. PhD thesis, ETH
Zürich, 2003.
[17] R. B. Rusu, N. Blodow, and M. Beetz. Fast point feature histograms (FPFH) for 3D registration. In ICRA,
2009.
[18] R. B. Rusu and S. Cousins. 3D is here: Point Cloud
Library (PCL). In ICRA, 2011.
[19] N. Silberman, D. Hoiem, P. Kohli, and R. Fergus. Indoor segmentation and support inference from RGBD
images. In ECCV, 2012.
[20] J. Sturm, N. Engelhard, F. Endres, W. Burgard, and
D. Cremers. A benchmark for the evaluation of RGBD SLAM systems. In IROS, 2012.
[21] J. Xiao, A. Owens, and A. Torralba. SUN3D: A
database of big spaces reconstructed using SfM and
object labels. In ICCV, 2013.
[22] Q.-Y. Zhou, J. Park, and V. Koltun. Fast global registration. In ECCV, 2016.

6

