1

An Overview of Physical Layer Security with
Finite-Alphabet Signaling
February 20, 2018

arXiv:1802.06401v1 [] 18 Feb 2018

Sina Rezaei Aghdam*, Alireza Nooraiepour** and Tolga M. Duman*
(*) Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey
(**) Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, US
Email: {aghdam, duman}@ee.bilkent.edu.tr, alireza.nooraiepour@rutgers.edu
Abstract
Providing secure communications over the physical layer has been receiving growing
attention within the past decade. The vast majority of the existing studies in the area of
physical layer security focus exclusively on the scenarios where the channel inputs are Gaussian
distributed. However, in practice, the signals employed for transmission are drawn from discrete
signal constellations such as phase shift keying and quadrature amplitude modulation. Hence,
understanding the impact of the finite-alphabet input constraints and designing secure transmission schemes under this assumption is a mandatory step towards a practical implementation
of physical layer security. With this motivation, this article reviews recent developments on
physical layer security with finite-alphabet inputs. We explore transmit signal design algorithms
for single-antenna as well as multi-antenna wiretap channels under different assumptions
on the channel state information at the transmitter. Moreover, we present a review of the
recent results on secure transmission with discrete signaling for various scenarios including
multi-carrier transmission systems, broadcast channels with confidential messages, cognitive
multiple access and relay networks. Throughout the article, we stress the important behavioral
differences of discrete and Gaussian inputs in the context of the physical layer security. We
also present an overview of the practical code construction over Gaussian and fading wiretap
channels, and we discuss some open problems and directions for future research.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

2

I. I NTRODUCTION
Wireless communications has become an indispensable part of our everyday lives. As
more and more data is being transmitted over wireless links, along with the reliability of
the transmission, ensuring secrecy of the sensitive information has become a challenging
issue. Traditionally, this issue is addressed using higher (network) layer solutions and
via computation-based mechanisms such as encryption. On the other hand, the security
provided by these methods mainly relies on the conjecture that the encryption function
is difficult to invert, which is not provable from a mathematical point of view. With
the ever-increasing computing power, encryption may no longer prevent information
leakage to sophisticated adversaries. Moreover, implementation of key-based secure
communications requires complicated protocols for key distribution and management,
which is highly challenging to implement in the cases of decentralized wireless networks.
Securing transmission at the physical layer is an alternative or a complement to the
cryptographic solutions. The basic idea is to exploit the inherent randomness of the
channel for achieving secrecy. Dissimilar to encryption based methods, in the schemes
employing physical layer security, no constraint is placed on the computational capability
of the eavesdropper. Furthermore, no key distribution/management is required in its
implementation.
During the past decade there has been an extensive growth of interest in studying the
capabilities of physical layer for securing communication. Several surveys and overview
papers are available describing the state-of-the-art on this topic. Fundamentals of physical
layer security are comprehensively explained in [1]-[4]. A review of recent results ranging
from point-to-point communications to multiuser scenarios is given in [5]. A number of
hurdles facing physical layer security are summarized in [6]. The authors in [7] present
a review of the recent research results on physical layer security under channel state
information (CSI) uncertainty in different nodes. A comprehensive overview on various

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

3

multiple antenna techniques in physical layer security is provided in [8].
The objective of this survey is to shed light on two other important (and highly related)
practical aspects, namely, secure transmission with discrete signaling and practical code
construction. We present a detailed review of the related recent results, underline the
important behavioral differences between the Gaussian inputs and discrete signaling,
and study the transmit signal design problem for securing communications in a variety
of scenarios. We also provide a review of recent results on practical code design for
secrecy, and make connections with the information theoretic results with finite inputs.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. In Section II, we provide a description of the fundamental concepts in physical layer security including the wiretap channel
model and different secrecy metrics. In Section III, we discuss the differences between
the secrecy performance of constellation-constrained and Gaussian inputs over Gaussian
wiretap channels. An overview of the secure multi-antenna transmission schemes with
finite-alphabet inputs is provided in Section IV. Sections V and VI discuss the scenarios
with multi-carrier transmission and multiuser channels, respectively. An overview of the
practical code design approaches for secrecy is presented in VII, followed by concluding
remarks and future research directions in Section VIII.
Notation: Vectors and matrices are denoted with lowercase and uppercase bold letters.
Non-bold letters are used to denote scalar values and calligraphic letters denote sets. The
expectation and probability mass (or density) function of a random variable W is denoted
by EW {.} and PW (.), respectively. P r(.) is used to denote the probability of an event.
An stands for a sequence of length n, i.e., An = {A(1), A(2), . . . , A(n)}. The notation
CN (m, R) denotes a circularly symmetric complex Gaussian random vector with mean
vector m and covariance matrix R.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

4

II. F UNDAMENTALS
The wiretap channel model, originally introduced by Wyner in [10], is the most basic
scenario in the study of physical layer security. In this model, while the sender Alice
wishes to transmit a message signal to a legitimate receiver Bob; a third party, Eve,
is present with the capability of eavesdropping on Alice’s signal. The channel between
Alice and Bob, and the channel between Alice and Eve are referred to as the main
channel and the eavesdropper’s channel, respectively. In physical layer security, one is
interested in transmitting in such a way to maximize the transmission rate over the main
channel while keeping the eavesdropper ignorant about the message. This leads to the
notion of secrecy capacity, which is defined as the maximum rate at which the transmitter
can use the main link so as to deliver its message to the legitimate receiver in a way that
the eavesdropper cannot successfully obtain any information about it. Characterization
of the secrecy capacity is one of the most fundamental problems in the literature of
physical layer security in that it can provide us with vital implications on how secure
transmission techniques can be designed.

A. Different Notions of Secrecy
Consider a transmitter who wishes to transmit a message M to a legitimate receiver
while trying to keep an eavesdropper ignorant about it. M is mapped to a codeword X n
using a stochastic encoder with n denoting the number of channel uses. Then, X n is
transmitted, and Y n and Z n are received at the legitimate receiver and the eavesdropper,
respectively. The eavesdropper’s level of uncertainty is quantified using the equivocation
rate which is given by
Re =

1
H(M ∣Z n ),
n

(1)

which is nothing but a measure of how unlikely it is that the eavesdropper can infer source
information from its received signal. According to this definition, large equivocation rates
February 20, 2018

DRAFT

5

are equivalent to higher secrecy levels.
There are different metrics for measuring the secrecy guaranteed by a specific scheme
among which the information-theoretic ones are recognized as the strongest. Perfect
secrecy is achievable in a system if the message M and its corresponding encoder
output X n are statistically independent [11]. This can be expressed as I(M ; X n ) = 0,
which means that the mutual information between the message and the encoded signal
is exactly zero. This is to say, the eavesdropper is not capable of recovering the message
via observation of the encoder output in view of the fact that this encoded signal does
not provide any information about it. For this form of secrecy to be guaranteed, a secret
key of the length at least equal to the length of the message should be used. However,
weaker requirements can be adopted for evaluation of the secrecy in practical scenarios.
One example of such notions is semantic secrecy, which is achieved if it is guaranteed
that Z n does not increase the probability of guessing an arbitrary function f of M (with
an arbitrary distribution PM ) more than  > 0 if Adv(M ; Z n ) < , where advantage
Adv(M ; Z n ) is defined as
Adv(M ; Z n ) = max ( ∑ PZ n (z n ) max P r(f (M ) = fi ∣z n )− max P r(f (M ) = fi )),
f,PM

zn

fi ∈supp(f )

fi ∈supp(f )

(2)
where supp(.) stands for the support of the function in its argument.
Assuming a uniform distribution for the message M , a system is called to operate
with strong secrecy if limn→∞ I(M ; Z n ) = 0, which means that if we consider codewords
of n symbols being transmitted by Alice as X n , the information leaked by observation
of the received vector Z n shall go to zero as n goes to infinity. On the other hand,
the condition limn→∞ n1 I(M ; Z n ) = 0 is referred to as weak secrecy. In particular, weak
secrecy requires the asymptotic rate of information leakage to be sublinear in n. Different
notions of secrecy, which are used to measure the secrecy guaranteed by a specific
scheme are summarized in Table I.
February 20, 2018

DRAFT

6

TABLE I: Four notions of secrecy.

Notion

Requirement

Perfect Secrecy [11]

I(M ; X n ) = 0

Semantic Secrecy [9]

Adv(M ; Z n ) < 

Strong Secrecy [12]

limn→∞ I(M ; Z n ) = 0

Weak Secrecy [10]

limn→∞ n1 I(M ; Z n ) = 0

B. Secrecy Capacity of Single-Antenna Wiretap Channels
The notion of secrecy capacity was originally introduced by Wyner in [10] for degraded wiretap channels. In the scenario studied in [10], the main channel and the
eavesdropper’s channel are assumed to be discrete memoryless channels (DMCs) where
Eve’s observation of the transmitted signal is a degraded version of the signal received by
Bob. Wyner showed that, the secrecy capacity for this scenario can be expressed as the
difference of the mutual information between Alice and Bob with that of Alice and Eve,
maximized over all input distributions. Generalization of the notion of secrecy capacity
to the case of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels has been accomplished
in [13]. It is shown that, for the case of a Gaussian wiretap channel, nonzero secrecy
capacity can be attained if Bob receives the signal through a less noisy channel.
While the scenarios considered in [10] and [13] put the eavesdropper at a disadvantage,
Csiszár and Körner have studied the problem of secrecy for non-degraded channels in
[14]. In this channel model, referred to as broadcast channel with confidential messages,
the message transmitted by Alice contains a common message intended to both Bob and
Eve as well as a secret message, which is intended for Bob only, and is needed to be
kept secret from Eve. It is shown that the secrecy capacity over a discrete memoryless

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

7

wiretap channel (DMWC) is given by
Cs = max I(U ; Y ) − I(U ; Z),

(3)

PX∣U ,PU

where U is an auxiliary random variable. With a given PY Z∣X (y, z∣x), the secrecy
capacity is achieved by maximizing the difference of the mutual information terms
corresponding to the main and the eavesdropper’s channels over all joint distributions
PU X (u, x) where U satisfies the Markov chain relationship U → X → Y Z.
In order to study the physical layer security in wireless communication scenarios, we
need to extend the wiretap channel model to a model, which takes into account the fading
phenomenon. Assuming a narrowband transmission, fading is modeled as multiplicative
gains over the main and eavesdropper’s channels, denoted by HB and HE , respectively.
The first characterization of the role of fading in providing physical layer security is
given in [15] where quasi-static fading channels are considered towards the legitimate
receiver and the eavesdropper. It is shown via analyzing the secrecy outage probability
that, in presence of fading, secure transmission is possible even in the scenarios where
the eavesdropper has a better SNR. The secrecy capacity over block fading channels has
been derived in [16] under the assumption that each coherence interval is long enough
to allow for invoking proper random coding arguments. Given that the transmitter knows
either the main CSI (MCSI) or both the main and the eavesdropper CSI (ECSI) perfectly,
an achievable secrecy rate can be formulated as [16]:
+

Rs = EHB ,HE {[I(X; Y ∣HB ) − I(X; Z∣HE )] },

(4)

where [a]+ = max{a, 0}. It has been shown in [16] that the secrecy capacity that is
achieved under the full CSI assumption serves as an upper bound on the secrecy capacity
when only MCSI is known at the transmitter. This is due to the fact that with the
knowledge of instantaneous ECSI, the transmitter is capable of realizing a more efficient
transmission, which provides additional gains in terms of secrecy rates. For instance,

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

8

when perfect knowledge of both channels are available, the transmitter can optimize the
transmit power according to the instantaneous values of the channel gains HB and HE ,
providing a higher secrecy rate with respect to the case where the optimization of the
transmit power is carried out according to the main channel only.
Under the assumption that the transmitter does not know the realizations of the
channels, and it only has their statistics, assuming that each receiver knows its own
channel, the secrecy capacity can be obtained with the aid of the results for the case of
DMWC [14] as
Cs = max I(U ; Y, HB ) − I(U ; Z, HE ),

(5)

PX∣U ,PU

where U satisfies the Markov chain relationship U → X → (Y, HB ), (Z, HE ). This is
obtained by treating HB and HE as channel outputs at the legitimate receiver and at the
eavesdropper, respectively [17], [18]. Using the chain rule of mutual information and
noting the fact that HB and HE are independent of X and U , the expression in (5) can
be modified as
Cs = max EHB I(U ; Y ∣HB ) − EHE I(U ; Z∣HE ).
PX∣U ,PU

(6)

Determining the optimal joint distribution PU X (u, x) and the resulting exact secrecy
capacity is an open problem, however, by ignoring the channel prefixing, the performance
can be quantified using an achievable ergodic secrecy rate as given by
+

Rs = [EHB I(X; Y ∣HB ) − EHE I(X; Z∣HE )] .

(7)

C. Secrecy Capacity of Multi-Antenna Wiretap Channels
Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) wiretap channel is an extension of the wiretap
channel to a scenario where all the nodes, namely, Alice, Bob and Eve, are equipped with
multiple antennas. The secrecy capacity for this setup has been determined independently
by Khisti and Wornell [19] and Oggier and Hassibi [20]. The results in [14] are employed

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

9

by Khisti and Wornell so as to develop a genie-aided upper bound on the secrecy capacity
in the general case of non-degraded MIMO wiretap channels. While their characterization
is through a saddlepoint, Oggier and Hassibi propose an alternative approach through a
single optimization process. It has been shown in both [19] and [20] that the achievable
secrecy rate is maximized when the channel input is Gaussian, and the secrecy capacity
of a MIMO wiretap channel is given by
Cs =

max

Kx ⪰0,T r(Kx )=P

H
log det(I + HB Kx HH
B ) − log det(I + HE Kx HE ),

(8)

where Kx = E{xxH }, and HB ∈ CNE ×Nt and HE ∈ CNE ×Nt are the channel matrices
corresponding to the legitimate receiver and the eavesdropper, respectively.
An alternative characterization of the secrecy capacity of the MIMO wiretap channel
is presented by Liu and Shamai in [21] where they consider a more general matrix
constraint on the channel input. We highlight that, while [19]–[21] prove that the optimal
input is Gaussian, the optimal input covariance matrix needs to be determined using
numerical optimization approaches (see, e.g., [22]–[23]).

D. Other Secrecy Metrics
Secrecy capacity is the most widely used measure for evaluation of the secrecy
performance. However, a complete characterization of the secrecy capacity region is
prohibitive in some scenarios. In such cases, alternative metrics can be adopted as
surveyed below.
1) Secrecy Outage Probability: Secrecy outage occurs when the instantaneous secrecy
capacity falls below a target secrecy rate Rs . In delay-critical applications and for
scenarios with quasi-static fading, encoding over multiple channel states is not possible.
In these cases, secure transmission schemes can be designed such that the probability of
occurrence of an outage event is minimized. Obviously, this serves as a weaker notion

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

10

than secrecy capacity. This is due to the fact that, with this formulation, secrecy is not
guaranteed for the entire transmission duration.
2) Error Probability Based Metrics: In a number of works on physical layer security,
secure transmission schemes are designed based on constraining the bit error rate at
the legitimate receiver and the eavesdropper to pre-specified threshold values. This
leads to definition of a parameter called “security gap,” which quantifies the minimum
required difference between the received SNR values at Bob and Eve to ensure that
the bit error rate (BER) at Bob is smaller than a threshold while that at the Eve’s
receiver is larger than another threshold [24]. One may note that imposing high BER
at the eavesdropper does not satisfy any of the requirements given in Table I. However,
security gap serves as a practical measure of secrecy in a number of applications such as
explicit and implementable code design for physical layer secrecy. Some studies (e.g.,
[25]) consider the difference in the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) at the
legitimate receiver and the eavesdropper as the secrecy metric. This is also a very weak
notion, which does not guarantee secrecy in an information theoretic sense.
III. G AUSSIAN W IRETAP C HANNELS WITH F INITE -A LPHABET I NPUTS
The secrecy capacity achieving input distribution over a Gaussian MIMO wiretap
channel is proved to be Gaussian [13]. However, due to the high detection complexity,
Gaussian signaling is not used in practice, and instead the transmission is carried out
with the aid of discrete inputs drawn from standard constellations such as PSK or QAM.
Hence, it is important to study the implications of discrete signaling in the context of
physical layer security.
As a first step in studying physical layer security under the finite-alphabet input
assumption, the impacts of standard constellations on the achievable secrecy rates of
Gaussian wiretap channels are studied in [26] and [27]. In [26], the authors evaluate
the constellation-constrained secrecy capacity and highlight an important behavioral
February 20, 2018

DRAFT

11

9

8

Capacity (bits/complex dim.)

7

6

BPSK
QPSK
16−PSK
16−QAM
64QAM
Gaussian

5

4

3

2

1

0
−15

−10

−5

0

5

10

15

20

25

SNR (dB)

Fig. 1: Capacity of an AWGN channel with Gaussian and constellation-constrained
inputs.

difference between finite-alphabet (e.g., PSK and QAM) and Gaussian inputs, that is, for
a fixed noise variance at Eve, the secrecy rate curves for PSK or QAM plotted against the
SNR have global maxima at finite SNR values. Investigation of the secrecy capacity of
the pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) inputs over a degraded Gaussian wiretap channel
in [27] leads to a similar conclusion. In addition, the authors in [27] demonstrate that
when finite constellations are employed, using all the available power for the information
bearing signal transmission may not be optimal. The reason behind these observations
has its roots in the mutual information expressions. That is, the capacity under an average
power constraint over an AWGN channel is given by
C = log2 (1 + SN R),

(9)

in bits per complex dimension, and it is an increasing function of the SNR. On the other
hand, the capacity of the constellation-constrained AWGN channel can be calculated as
February 20, 2018

DRAFT

12

[28]
⎧
⎫
⎪
∑x′ ∈X pY ∣X ′ (y∣x′ ) ⎪
⎪
⎪
I(X; Y ) = log2 ∣X ∣ − EX,Y ⎨ log2
⎬,
(10)
⎪
⎪
pY ∣X (y∣x)
⎪
⎪
⎩
⎭
where X is a constellation set and ∣X ∣ denotes its cardinality. Dissimilar to the capacity
expression in (9), the mutual information term in (10) converges to log2 ∣X ∣ at high SNRs
(see Fig. 1). This means that by increasing the transmit power, the mutual information
terms I(X; Y ) and I(X; Z) (calculated using (10)) will reach the saturation value, and
the secrecy rate drops to zero. This is also verified in Fig. 2, where the secrecy rates
are obtained by evaluating the difference of the mutual information terms corresponding
to the main and eavesdropper’s channels, under the assumption that the SNR at the
eavesdropper (denoted by SNRe ) is lower than the legitimate reciever’s SNR (denoted
by SNRb ) by 1.5 dB. This also clarifies that using all the available transmit power for
information transmission in the high SNR regime is not optimal [27]. Furthermore, it
can be observed from Fig. 2 that higher secrecy rates are achieved over Gaussian wiretap
channels by increasing the modulation orders.
The impact of output quantization on the secrecy rate of the binary-input Gaussian
wiretap channel is investigated in [29]. It is shown through theoretical analysis that
when the legitimate receiver has unquantized inputs where the eavesdropper has (binary)
quantized outputs higher secrecy rates are achievable with respect to the case where both
receivers have binary quantized or unquantized outputs.
To conclude this section, we note that while it may be tempting to argue that, as in
the case of transmission over an AWGN channel with no security considerations, one
can design general transmission schemes using Gaussian codebooks and simply adopt
the ideas to the case of inputs from standard constellations (e.g., PSK, QAM, etc.),
this approach does not extend in a straightforward manner. The optimal transmit signal
design strategies under Gaussian input assumption lead to considerable losses when
applied to the inputs drawn from standard constellations. For instance, it is shown in
February 20, 2018

DRAFT

13

0.45

Secrecy Rates (bits/complex dim.)

0.4
0.35

BPSK
QPSK
16−QAM
64−QAM

0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
−15

−10

−5

0
5
10
SNR at Bob (SNRB)

15

20

25

Fig. 2: Secrecy rates with PSK and QAM over a degraded Gaussian wiretap channel
(SNRE = SNRB − 1.5 dB).

[27] the optimal power allocation strategy with PAM inputs is in sharp contrast to that of
Gaussian inputs. This motivates development of new algorithms and ideas for practical
constellation-constrained channels.
IV. FADING AND M ULTI -A NTENNA W IRETAP C HANNELS D RIVEN BY
F INITE -A LPHABET I NPUTS
Fading introduces new potentials for securing communications at the physical layer.
Specifically, the randomness due to the channel fluctuations can be exploited opportunistically by a transmitter to guarantee secrecy even in the scenarios where the eavesdropper
possesses a higher SNR (on average) than the legitimate receiver. Dissimilar to the
Gaussian wiretap channel where Gaussian input is secrecy capacity achieving, in the
presence of fading, discrete signaling may achieve higher secrecy rates. For instance, it
has been shown in [30] that, when Bob’s channel gain is on average worse than that of
February 20, 2018

DRAFT

14

Fig. 3: MIMO wiretap channel.

Eve’s, QAM inputs achieve higher secrecy rates at low and moderate SNR regimes. This
is because the discrete nature of the QAM inputs limits the leakage at the eavesdropper
whose channel is unusually good. At sufficiently high SNRs, however, the secrecy rate
with QAM inputs drops to zero similar to what is observed for the case of Gaussian
wiretap channels.
Taking advantage of the spatial degrees of freedom introduced by multi-antenna transmission can serve as an efficient solution to prevent secrecy rate of standard constellations
from dropping to zero at high SNRs. In the remainder of this section, we focus on a
system model where Alice, Bob and Eve are equipped with Nt , NB and NE antennas,

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

15

as depicted in Fig. 3. The received signals are given by
y = HB x + ny ,

(11)

z = HE x + nz ,

(12)

where HB and HE are the channel matrices corresponding to the legitimate receiver
and the eavesdropper. ny and nz denote circularly symmetric complex AWGN vectors,
elements of which follow CN (0, σ 2ny ) and CN (0, σ 2nz ), respectively.
Transmit precoding and artificial noise injection serve as important approaches for
enhancing secrecy [5]. Via precoding, it is possible to strengthen (or weaken) the transmitted signals in certain directions. Accordingly, it can be used as an effective tool to
increase the quality difference between the signals received at the legitimate receiver
and the eavesdropper. Beamforming is a special case of precoding where the transmitter
is restricted to using rank-one signals. It has a lower complexity with respect to the
general transmit precoding solution, achieved at the price of some performance loss.
Furthermore, injection of artificial noise [31] can effectively degrade the reception at the
eavesdropper while having no (or minimal) effect on the signal received at the legitimate
receiver. We also note that, to take advantage of the potentials offered by the channel
fading, the transmitter needs a certain level of knowledge on the CSI of both channels.
In what follows, we review the existing solutions for secure transmission over MIMO
wiretap channels with finite-alphabet inputs under different CSIT assumptions.

A. Transmit Signal Design with Full CSI
The most optimistic assumption regarding the transmitter’s CSI knowledge is availability of perfect instantaneous realizations of the channel matrices HB and HE . This
assumption is justifiable in the scenarios where Eve is an authorized user in the network,
however, she should be kept ignorant about the confidential messages transmitted from
Alice to Bob. In this case, the transmitter can take advantage of the full CSI knowledge
February 20, 2018

DRAFT

16

to design a precoder, which results in the maximal quality difference between the signals
received at the legitimate receiver and the eavesdropper.
With the aid of the perfect CSI corresponding to both channels, a generalized singular
value decomposition (GSVD) precoding solution has been proposed in [32] using which
the MIMO multi-antenna eavesdropper (MIMOME) channel is converted into a bank
of parallel channels, and a power allocation strategy is formulated to maximize the
achievable secrecy rate.
The necessary conditions for optimum transmit precoding is derived in [33], and it
is demonstrated that the GSVD precoding [32] is suboptimal. Alternatively, a gradient
descent optimization is proposed in which the precoder matrices are updated with steps
proportional to the gradient of the instantaneous secrecy rate. Furthermore, it is shown
that transmission along the null-space of the eavesdropper’s channel is the optimal
secure transmission strategy at the high-SNR regime. This is because, with a precoder
matrix along the null-space of the eavesdropper’s channel, the achievable rate at the
eavesdropper is suppressed to zero, and when the SNR is sufficiently high, the rate at
the legitimate receiver approaches the maximum value that can be achieved with the use
of specific finite-alphabet inputs, which guarantees that the secrecy rate is maximized.
However, it should be noted that, when the number of transmit antennas is less than or
equal to the number of antennas at the eavesdropper, it is not possible to suppress her
information rate by transmitting along the null-space of HE . Therefore, for maximizing
secrecy rates, only part of the available power should be allocated to data transmission.
Given Nt > NB , the authors in [33] suggest to use the excess power for transmission of
an artificial noise signal along the null-space of HB so as to prevent the secrecy rates
from dropping to zero. Fig. 4 compares the achievable secrecy rates by the schemes
proposed in [32] and [33] for a wiretap channel with Nt = 2, NB = 1 and NE = 1, and

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

17

fixed channels given by1
hB = [0.5128 − 0.3239j −0.8903 − 0.0318j ] ,

(13)

hE = [0.3880 + 1.2024j −0.9825 + 0.5914j ] .

(14)

The precoding approach proposed in [33] outperforms the GSVD-based precoding [32].
This improved performance is attained at the price of increased computational complexity. Furthermore, comparing the results given in Fig. 4 with those of Fig. 2 for QPSK
inputs over the Gaussian wiretap channel reveals the advantages offered by fading and
CSI-based precoding approaches.
An important conclusion that can be drawn from the results in [32] and [33] is that,
as in the case of non-fading channels, the structure of the optimal precoders under
the finite-alphabet input assumption is different from that of the precoders, which are
optimal for Gaussian inputs. For example, over MISO multi-antenna eavesdropper (MISOME) channels, the optimal transmission strategy is beamforming along the eigenvector
corresponding to the largest generalized eigenvalue of (Hb , He ) [34]. However, these
precoders (which correspond to signaling with rank one covariance), when applied to
the finite-alphabet inputs, undergo a considerable loss with respect to the precoders
optimized with finite-alphabet inputs (see, e.g., Fig. 7 in [33]).
As an alternative method to design a suboptimal precoder, one may also replace
the secrecy capacity with practical metrics (as opposed to those ensuring secrecy in
an information-theoretic sense) such as SINR-based metrics. For instance, the authors
in [35] design artificial noise beamformers, which serve as constructive interference to
the legitimate receiver (improving Bob’s SINR) while disrupting the reception at the
eavesdropper (degrading Eve’s SINR). In Table II, we summarize the precoder design
approaches with full CSI.
1

This example has also been considered in [33] and [34].

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

18

10
9

Secrecy capacity [34] (Gaussian inputs)
Gradient Descent Opt. [33] − QPSK inputs
GSVD−based Precoding [32] − QPSK inputs

Secrecy Rates (bits/s/Hz)

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
−10

−5

0

5

10
SNR (dB)

15

20

25

30

Fig. 4: Secrecy rates with QPSK inputs over fixed channels given in (13) and (14).

TABLE II: Precoder design with full CSI
Authors

System Model

Contributions

S. Bashar et al. [32]

MIMOME

Propose a GSVD-based precoding algorithm.

Y. Wu et al. [33]

MIMOME

Derive the necessary conditions for optimality of the precoder matrix and
develop a gradient descent based precoder optimization algorithm.

M. R. A. Khandaker et al. [35]

MISO, multiple

Design artificial noise which is constructive to the legitimate receiver and

Eves

destructive to the eavesdroppers.

B. Perfect MCSI and Statistical ECSI
While availability of the perfect ECSI at the transmitter may be practical in some
limited scenarios, in general, it is highly challenging to obtain it instantaneously. A
more practical assumption regarding CSIT is the availability of perfect MCSI along

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

19

with the statistical ECSI at the transmitter. On the other hand, the precoder design in
this scenario is not as effective as those carried out with the perfect knowledge of both
channels. In other words, in the absence of the instantaneous ECSI, precoding is not
as forceful in suppressing the reception at the eavesdropper. For instance, transmission
along the null-space of the eavesdropper’s channel is not even possible in this scenario.
An example of secure transmission scheme under perfect MCSI and statistical ECSI
is given in [37] where the authors consider a MISOME channel and define a practical
secrecy metric (instead of an information theoretic one), which quantifies the symbol
error probability of the confidential data, and show that in the absence of artificial noise,
secrecy diversity (i.e., the high-SNR slope of their defined metric) vanishes. This result
underlines the importance of artificial noise injection in these scenarios.
Artificial noise-aided transmit precoding strategies with the objective of maximizing
the secrecy rate are proposed in [38]–[40]. In [38], the authors employ naive beamforming
along with the artificial noise injection while considering single-antenna receivers. The
strategy proposed in [33], on the other hand, relies on an iterative maximization of an
approximation to the instantaneous secrecy rate. In both of these studies, it has been
shown that the optimal schemes allocate only a fraction of the total power for signal
transmission at high SNRs. Hence, the remaining power is employed for artificial noise
injection. It is shown in [39] that jointly optimizing the precoder matrix and portion of the
power allocated to the artificial noise outperforms the solutions, which rely on optimizing
the precoder only. Moreover, inspired by the idea proposed in [41], a generalized artificial
noise aided transmission is introduced in [40], which guarantees high secrecy rates for
the scenarios with Nt < NE where injection of artificial noise along the null-space of
the main channel is not possible. A summary of the existing solutions for the scenarios
with perfect MCSI and statistical ECSI at the transmitter is given in Table III.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

20

TABLE III: Precoder design with perfect MCSI and statistical ECSI.
Authors

System Model

Contributions

T. V. Nguyen et al. [37]

MISOME

Define a weak notion of secrecy based on symbol error probability and
quantify the impact of artificial noise injection with beamforming on
diversity order.

S. Bashar et al. [38]

MISOSE

Employ a naive beamforming with the aid of MCSI only along with a
power optimization using perfect MCSI and statistical ECSI. The excess
power is used for artificial noise injection in the null-space of HB .

Y. Wu et al. [33]

MIMOME

Develops an iterative algorithm for precoder design and allocate the
excess power to inject artificial noise along the null-space of HB .

S. Rezaei Aghdam and
T. M. Duman [40]

MIMOME

Propose a joint precoder and (generalized) artificial noise optimization
algorithm.

C. Perfect MCSI Only
In the scenarios with a passive eavesdropper, a realistic assumption is that the transmitter does not know anything about the eavesdropper’s channel. Under this assumption,
[42] and [43] propose a secure transmission strategy referred to as directional modulation,
in which the amplitude and the phase of the transmit signal are adjusted by varying the
length of the reflector antennas for each symbol. This scrambles the PSK symbols in
all the directions other than that of the legitimate receiver. Other strategies for securing
communications without the knowledge of the eavesdropper’s channel are proposed in
[44] and [45]. Zhang et al. develop a Tomlinson-Harashima precoding in [44] where
the transmitter allocates part of its power in order to achieve a target mean squared
error (MSE) at the legitimate receiver, and the remaining power is used to transmit
artificial noise to degrade the eavesdropper’s reception. In [45], a secure space-time block
coding (STBC) scheme is proposed in which enables the legitimate receiver to perform
separable decoding, while requiring an exhaustive maximum likelihood (ML) detection

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

21

at the eavesdropper. Furthermore, the authors combine this scheme with artificial noise
injection to ensure a high uncoded BER at Eve. Table IV summarizes the existing
transmit signal design approaches under perfect MCSI and no ECSI at the transmitter.

TABLE IV: Transmit signal design with perfect MCSI and no ECSI.
Authors

System Model

Contributions

A. Kalantari et al. [42],

MIMOME

Steer the array beam such that the phase of the PSK modulated signal

[43]
L. Zhang et al. [44]

is scrambled in directions other than Bob.
MIMOME

Propose a nonlinear Tomlinson-Harashima precoding along with along
with artificial noise injection.

S. A. A. Fakoorian et

MIMOME Nt =

Design a STBC which results in a high BER for Eve and a low BER

al. [45]

NB = 2, NE ≥ 1

for Bob.

D. Statistical MCSI and ECSI
While most of the existing physical layer security solutions rely on the assumption
that the transmitter is capable of estimating at least the instantaneous main CSI, in
some scenarios (e.g., for fast fading channels), it may be difficult for the transmitter
to track the rapidly varying channel coefficients. For these cases, the impact of the
discrete inputs on the achievable secrecy rates is analyzed in [46]. Under the assumption
that both channels are doubly correlated, using the knowledge of transmit and receive
correlation matrices, transmit signal design algorithms are proposed in [47] to maximize
the resulting achievable secrecy rates. The results in [47] reveal that jointly optimizing
the precoder matrix and artificial noise results in increased achievable secrecy rates with
respect to precoding without artificial noise injection. The existing studies on MIMO
wiretap channels with statistical CSI are summarized in Table V.
We now compare the secrecy rates achieved by different transmit signal design approaches under different CSIT assumptions. In particular, we overview the results for the
February 20, 2018

DRAFT

22

scenarios with perfect or statistical CSI at the transmitter. When perfect CSI is available,
each element of HB and HE are modeled as independent and identically distributed
(i.i.d.) with CN (0, σB2 ) and CN (0, σE2 ), respectively. When considering the statistical
CSI corresponding to the main channel or the eavesdropper’s channel, a commonly
adopted model in the literature employs doubly correlated channels with
1/2

1/2

HB = ΨrB ĤB ΨtB ,

1/2

1/2

HE = ΨrE ĤE ΨtE ,

(15)

where the elements of ĤB and ĤE are i.i.d., and the transmitter is capable of acquiring
the transmit and receive correlation matrices, i.e., Ψtb , Ψte , Ψrb and Ψre , from the longterm statistics of the channel. The perfect instantaneous CSI is available at the receivers,
including the legitimate receiver and the eavesdropper.
Fig. 5 demonstrates the achievable secrecy rates by different transmission schemes
over a MIMOME wiretap channel with Nt = 4 and NB = NE = 2. Correlation matrices
are assumed to have exponentially decaying entries as
[Ψt (ρ)]ij = ρt ∣i−j∣ ,
[Ψr (ρ)]mk = ρr ∣m−k∣ ,

i, j = 1, 2, . . . , Nt ,

(16)

m, k = 1, 2, . . . , NB (or, NE ).

(17)

It is demonstrated that the precoder design using a gradient descent optimization
approach [33], [40] is a promising strategy for maximizing the secrecy rates. Fig. 5 also
reveals the importance of CSIT. When perfect CSI corresponding to the eavesdropper is

TABLE V: Transmit signal design with statistical MCSI and ECSI.
Authors

System Model

Contributions

M. Girnyk et al. [46]

MIMOME

Derive large system approximation for secrecy rate under arbitrary
channel inputs and quantify it for Gaussian and finite-alphabet inputs.

S. Rezaei Aghdam and
T. M. Duman [47]

February 20, 2018

MIMOME

Propose precoding and artificial noise injection approaches with the aid
of the knowledge on correlation matrices.

DRAFT

23

4

Ergodic Secrecy Rates (bits/s/Hz)

3.5

3

2.5

2

1.5

1

0.5

Perfect MCSI and ECSI [33]
Perfect MCSI and statistical ECSI [39]- ρte = 0.8, ρre=0.8
Statistical MCSI and ECSI [47]- ρtb = 0.9, ρre=0.6, ρte = 0.8, ρre=0.8

0
-10

-5

0

5

10
SNR (dB)

15

20

25

Fig. 5: Secrecy rates with different transmit signal design algorithms under different
CSIT assumptions.

available at the transmitter, it is possible to construct precoders, which are aligned with
the null-space of the eavesdropper’s channel. By this means, the achievable rate of the
eavesdropper can be suppressed to zero. Furthermore, even when perfect CSI of the main
user is available along with the statistical CSI of the eavesdropper, high secrecy rates are
still achievable with the aid of appropriately designed artificial noise injection strategies.
However, in the absence of instantaneous CSI, the precoder matrices designed with the
knowledge of correlation matrices are not capable of preventing the ergodic secrecy
rates from dropping to zero at high SNRs. In other words, since statistical CSI does
not provide sufficient degrees of freedom to take advantage of the fading for improving
secrecy, the behavior is similar to that in AWGN channels described in Section III.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

24

E. Transmit Signal Design Based on Channel Reciprocity
A group of transmission strategies in the literature of physical layer security rely on
the assumption of channel reciprocity, that is, the transmitter and the legitimate receiver
observe the same channel, simultaneously. For the systems working in time division
duplex (TDD) mode, this property can be used to allow the transmitter to obtain the MCSI
using the pilots transmitted from the legitimate receiver. In [48], a secure transmission
scheme is proposed over a MIMO wiretap channel under the assumption that no training
signals are transmitted by Alice, and hence, no CSI is available at Bob or Eve. Alice
realizes an orthogonal space-time block coded PSK transmission and uses the CSI she
obtains from the reverse channel estimation to design a phase shifting precoder, which
compensates the phase shift by the channel. Therefore, Bob can recover the transmitted
messages with no need to CSI. On the other hand, Eve who observes an independent
channel can only recover the information with non-coherent detection, ensuring that this
strategy provides positive secrecy rates over MIMO wiretap channels.
In the scenarios with channel reciprocity, when channel estimation is carried out both
in the forward (from Alice to Bob) and the reverse (from Bob to Alice) directions, the
channel between Alice and Bob can serve as a source of common randomness, which can
further improve the secrecy. This common randomness is used in [49] for generation of
a random phase sequence, which is then used to manipulate the transmitted symbols (by
simply multiplying them by the obtained random phase terms). Since the eavesdropper
is unable to find out these random phase values, an enhanced secrecy is attained.

F. Performance-Complexity Trade-off in Transmit Signal Design
The iterative algorithms proposed in [33] and [40] for optimizing the precoder matrix
are shown to provide promising results in terms of the achievable secrecy rates. However,
their implementation complexity may be too high for some practical applications. There

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

25

are two main reasons for this high computational complexity. First, both the mutual
information and its gradient lack closed-form expressions. Therefore, Monte Carlo simulations need to be utilized to evaluate both terms, which require averaging over a
large number of noise realizations in order to maintain a high level of accuracy. More
importantly, the evaluation of the mutual information and the minimum MSE (MMSE)
term involves additions over the modulation signal space, which grows exponentially
with the number of transmit antennas, resulting in a prohibitively high computational
complexity when the number of transmit antennas is large.
Different strategies are proposed for lowering the computational complexity associated
with the transmit signal design for secrecy under the finite-alphabet input assumption.
The authors in [33] and [39] derive closed-form approximations for the secrecy rate
expressions using bounds on mutual information. While the former employs the bounds
given in [50], the latter approximates the mutual information using the cut-off rate
expression. The authors in [51]-[52] derive asymptotic secrecy rates in a regime where
the numbers of antennas at the transmitter and both receivers grow infinitely large
with a constant ratio. Maximization of this expression is shown to yield a satisfactory
performance even in the cases of small number of antennas. The authors in [53] and
[40] propose per-group precoding strategies under perfect and partial CSIT assumptions,
respectively. In these works, the channels are diagonalized and the precoder matrices are
designed by grouping the transmit antennas and designing the precoder matrix for each
group, independently.
G. Secure Spatial Modulation
Spatial modulation and space shift keying (SSK) are relatively new MIMO transmission schemes, which rely on encoding information via active antenna indices. Similar
to the amplitude or phase modulation schemes, in spatial modulation and SSK, the
channel inputs are drawn from discrete and finite sets. More specifically, in spatial
February 20, 2018

DRAFT

26

modulation [54], the data bits are mapped into two information carrying blocks: 1) an
antenna index selected from the set of transmit antennas, 2) a symbol drawn from a
standard constellation. Space shift keying is a special case of spatial modulation where
no amplitude of phase modulation is employed, i.e., the transmit antenna index serves
as the only information carrying unit [55].
Different studies explore the advantages offered by spatial modulation over state-ofthe-art MIMO schemes (see [56] for a comprehensive overview). Along with different
application areas of spatial modulation and SSK, studying these transmission schemes
in the context of physical layer security has been of recent interest. Secrecy capacity
of spatial modulation for the scenarios with two transmit antennas is studied in [57],
and the results are extended to MISOSE and MIMOME scenarios in [58] and [59],
respectively.
Different secure spatial modulation transmission schemes are also proposed with the
aid of MCSI and ECSI at the transmitter and for systems with channel reciprocity. A
precoder optimization algorithm for maximizing secrecy rates with SSK transmission
using full CSI is proposed in [60]. The authors in [61] provide a precoder design and
artificial noise injection approach for securing spatial modulation for the scenarios with
passive eavesdroppers (with no ECSI at the transmitter). The secrecy rates of spatial
modulation with artificial noise injection are characterized in [62]. While the conventional
artificial noise injection (similar to what is considered in [62]) requires multiple antennas
to be activated, a novel secure artificial noise aided transmission is introduced in [63],
which requires only two antennas to be activated at each time instance. The secure
transmit signal design approaches for spatial modulation and SSK are summarized in
Table VI.
For the scenarios where channel reciprocity holds, a transmit preprocessing technique
is proposed in [64] under the assumption that the training sequences are transmitted from

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

27

TABLE VI: Transmit signal design for secure spatial modulation and SSK.
Paper

Model

Contributions

S. Sinanovic et al. [57]

Nt = 2, NB = NE = 1,

Characterize secrecy rates for spatial modulation and SSK

No CSI at the transmitter

transmission.

MISOSE

Evaluate the secrecy rates by deriving mutual information

X. Guan et al. [58]

terms and propose a precoding with the aid of full CSI.
S. Rezaei Aghdam and

MIMOME, No CSI at the

Derive expressions for achievable secrecy rates with spatial

T. M. Duman [59]

transmitter

modulation and SSK schemes.

S. Rezaei Aghdam and

MIMOME, Full CSI at the

Develop an iterative precoder design algorithm.

T. M. Duman [60]

transmitter

F. Wu et al. [61]

MIMOME, Nt > NB ,

Propose a precoder and artificial noise design.

MCSI at the transmitter
L. Wang et al. [62]

Z. Huang et al. [63]

MIMOME, Nt > NB ,

Characterize the secrecy rates of artificial noise aided spatial

MCSI at the transmitter

modulation.

MIMOME, MCSI at the

Propose an artificial noise aided secure quadrature spatial

transmitter.

modulation which requires low-complexity hardware.

Bob to Alice, and no CSI is available at the receiver nodes. The authors in [65] propose
a dynamic antenna index assignment based on the main channel when training is carried
out at both directions, which prevents an eavesdropper from obtaining the antenna index
assignment pattern.

V. OFDM W IRETAP C HANNEL WITH D ISCRETE I NPUTS
Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) provides robustness against multipath channel fading and offers flexibility in resource allocation. These features have
made OFDM a widely used technique in recent wireless standards including 4G and 5G
wireless systems. In the literature of physical layer security, OFDM can be modeled as

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

28

a set of independent parallel channels2 . It is proved in [67] that the secrecy capacity of
K independent parallel channels is achieved when each channel achieves its individual
secrecy capacity. For parallel Gaussian wiretap channels, the optimal input is Gaussian
distributed [68]. However, a more practical study of OFDM wiretap channel is possible
via assuming that the data symbols belong to finite constellations.
An initial study on parallel Gaussian wiretap channel under finite-alphabet inputs is
reported in [27] where the authors have characterized the secrecy capacity with PAM
inputs. They also provided a Mercury-waterfilling interpretation of the optimal power
allocation strategy. It is observed in [27], that dissimilar to standard parallel Gaussian
channels (with no constraints on the input distribution), it may not be optimal to use
all available power for PAM inputs. In [69], the OFDM wiretap is studied with QAM
inputs. After quantifying the loss in the secrecy rates with respect to the scenarios with
Gaussian inputs, a bit loading strategy is proposed to minimize this loss by assigning
an appropriate number of bits to each subchannel.
The sensitivity of OFDM based transmissions to frequency synchronization errors can
be exploited to provide secure transmission as well. The authors in [70] propose a secure
OFDM transmission over reciprocal channels, which relies on inducing carrier frequency
offset that is pre-compensated (using the transmitter’s knowledge on the MCSI) in
such way that it is received without inter-carrier interference at the legitimate receiver,
while the reception at the eavesdropper who receives the signal through an independent
channel is considerably degraded. In [71], an eavesdropping resilient OFDM scheme is
developed over reciprocal channels where Alice performs a subcarrier interleaving using
her knowledge on the instantaneous MCSI. The legitimate receiver who is also capable
of acquiring the MCSI can obtain the interleaving pattern and de-interleave the received
signals. In contrast, the eavesdropper cannot derive the interleaving pattern initiated by
2

This is based on the assumption that both the legitimate receiver and the eavesdropper use OFDM receivers.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

29

TABLE VII: OFDM wiretap channel with discrete inputs
Paper

Model

Contributions

M. R. D. Rodrigues et

Parallel Gaussian Wire-

Characterize secrecy rates with PAM inputs and derive optimal

al. [27]

tap Channels

power allocation strategy.

F. Renna et al. [69]

SISOSE

Evaluate the secrecy rates for OFDM systems with QAM input
constellations and provide a bit-loading strategy.

M. Yusuf et al. [70]

H. Li et al. [71]

H. Qin et al. [72]

SISOSE with reciprocal

Suggest inducing carrier frequency offset which is pre-

main channel

compensated in the legitimate receiver’s direction.

SISOSE with reciprocal

Propose subcarrier interleaving based on the MCSI which pre-

main channel

vents eavesdropper from de-interleaving the received signals.

SISOSE

Introduce a time-domain artificial noise injection approach and
propose a joint optimization of data power and artificial noise
covariance matrix.

T. Akitaya et al. [73]

MIMOME

Study application time-domain artificial noise injection approach
in multi-antenna scenarios.

the transmitter, and as a result, fails to acquire the transmitted information.
The temporal degrees of freedom offered by the cyclic prefix can be used for artificial
noise injection so as to improve secrecy over OFDM wiretap channels. In [72], a singleantenna OFDM wiretap channel is considered and an artificial noise signal is inserted
into the time-domain signal (over the cyclic prefix samples). A framework for joint
optimization of the power allocated to each subcarrier and artificial noise covariance
matrix is also proposed. In [73], Akitaya et al. study the application of time-domain
artificial noise injection in MIMOME OFDM systems. The results in [72] and [73]
demonstrate that this approach is efficient for improving the secrecy rates in OFDM
wiretap channels.
Table VII summarizes various results on the study of OFDM wiretap channels under
the finite-alphabet input assumption.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

30

VI. C ONSTELLATION C ONSTRAINED M ULTIUSER AND C OOPERATIVE W IRETAP
C HANNELS
The concept of physical layer security has also been extended to multi-user and
cooperative networks in recent years. In addition to the numerous studies on the limits
of secure communications in the scenarios with more than two receivers, multiple
transmitters and presence of relays/jammers/helpers (see [5] for a survey), some recent
focus has been placed on the practical constellation-constrained secure transmission for
these scenarios.

A. Multiuser and Multi-Eve Networks
1) Broadcast Channel with Confidential Messages: The achievable rate region for
Gaussian broadcast channel with confidential messages is characterized for discrete
inputs in [74]. In this scenario, the transmitter’s objective is to send a common message
to two receivers as well as to deliver a confidential message to one of them. Dissimilar
to [27] and [26] where standard constellations are considered, in [74], the symbols are
allowed to be arbitrary, and the achievable secrecy rate region is enlarged by optimizing
the symbol positions and the probability distribution of the symbols. The shrinkage of
the rate region due to employing PAM inputs is quantified with respect to the optimal
Gaussian inputs, and a number of important behavioral differences between these cases
are highlighted.
2) Multiple Access Channels: The authors in [75] focus their attention on the multiple
access wiretap channels under the assumption that the users employ the Alamouti STBC
scheme. Specifically, they consider a case where multiple transmitters communicate with
one legitimate receiver in the presence of an eavesdropper. Under the assumption that
the transmitter has the knowledge of the legitimate channel and does not know the
eavesdropper’s channel gain, an artificial noise injection is proposed along the null-

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

31

space of the main channel, which is shown to give rise to considerable improvements
in the secrecy sum-rate.
3) Cognitive Radio Networks: The linear precoder design for the cognitive multipleaccess wiretap and the cognitive multi-antenna wiretap channels with finite-alphabet
inputs are studied in [76] and [77], respectively. In [76], the authors consider a setup
in which two secondary-user transmitters are communicating with a secondary-user
receiver in presence of an eavesdropper and under interference threshold constraints at
the primary users. A two-layer precoding algorithm is proposed using statistical CSI at
the transmitters to maximize the ergodic secrecy sum rate. In [77], on the other hand, the
authors study a scenario where a multi-antenna secondary-user transmitter communicates
with a multi-antenna secondary-user receiver and the communication is wiretapped by
a multi-antenna eavesdropper. In this work, the precoder matrix is optimized using an
iterative algorithm (assuming statistical CSI of all the channels) so that the secrecy rate
of the secondary user is maximized while power leakage to the primary user sharing the
same frequency spectrum is controlled.
4) Multi-Eavesdropper Scenarios: The authors in [78] study a setup comprised of a
source, a legitimate receiver and multiple multi-antenna eavesdroppers. They first obtain
an expression for an achievable secrecy rate, and then, under the full CSI assumption,
they optimize the transmit power and the beamforming vector. The problem of power
allocation for secrecy over MIMO wiretap channels with multiple eavesdroppers is
studied in [79]. Under the assumption that the transmitter has the perfect MCSI and
statistical ECSI, the proposed power allocation strategy gives non-zero secrecy rates at
high transmit powers. This is important because in the absence of this power control
strategy, secrecy rate decreases with increasing transmit power, and it drops to zero when
the eavesdroppers’ SNRs get higher than a certain value.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

32

B. Relay Channels and Cooperative Communications
Cooperation serves as an efficient method for enhancing secrecy in wireless networks.
In this context, along with the studies conducted on secrecy capacity in various cooperative scenarios, a number of recent studies focus on finite-alphabet inputs as the
signaling scheme. In this context, the secrecy rates achieved with decode-and-forward
(DF) relay beamforming under finite-alphabet input assumption are characterized in [80].
It is shown that by optimizing the source power and also the relay weights using global
CSI, it is possible to prevent the secrecy rates from dropping to zero. The authors in
[81] consider a cooperative jamming network in presence of multiple eavesdroppers
and develop a secure transmission scheme with finite-alphabet inputs, which relies on a
joint optimization of the artificial noise (injected in the null-space of relay-destination
links) and power allocation among the source and the relays. The study in [82] considers
secure transmission over a MIMOME setup with the aid of a multi-antenna helper, which
transmits a jamming signal to degrade the signal received by the eavesdropper. Similar
to [81], a framework is provided for joint optimization of the precoder matrix and power
allocation between the transmitter and the helper. Furthermore, low-complexity transmit
signal design schemes are developed for both low and high SNR regimes.
Table VIII summarizes the recent research results of secure transmission over finiteinput multi-user, multi-eavesdropper and cooperative channels.
VII. P RACTICAL W IRETAP C ODE C ONSTRUCTIONS
The achievability of the secrecy rates described in the previous sections is proved with
the aid of random coding arguments, i.e., from an information theoretic point of view.
However, in practice, one needs to realize secure communications with the aid of practical
codes. In this regard, explicit and implementable code design for secrecy has also been
a topic of recent interest to researchers. In particular, error-correcting codes have found
a new role since the emergence of physical layer security. Aside from providing reliable
February 20, 2018

DRAFT

33

TABLE VIII: Multi-user, multi-eavesdropper and cooperative secure transmission with
discrete inputs.
Paper

Network

Contributions

Z. Mheich et al. [74]

Broadcast channel with

Characterize secrecy rate region with PAM inputs and enhance it by

confidential message

optimizing symbol positions and the joint probability distribution.

MAC Wiretap

Develop a secure Alamouti transmission with artificial noise injec-

T. Allen et al. [75]

tion with perfect MCSI and statistical ECSI.
J. Jin et al. [76]

Cognitive MAC Wiretap

A two-layer precoding is proposed using statistical CSI to maximize secrecy sum-rate.

W. Zeng et al. [77]

K. Cao et al. [78]

Cognitive Multi-Antenna

Propose an iterative precoder optimization algorithm with statistical

Wiretap

CSI.

MISO
Multiple

Wiretap

with

Multi-Antenna

Study joint optimization of beamforming vector and transmitting
power with full CSI.

Eavesdroppers
S. Vishwakarma et al.

MIMO Wiretap with Mul-

Employ a power allocation strategy with perfect MCSI and statis-

[79]

tiple Eavesdroppers

tical ECSI.

S. Vishwakarma et al.

DF Relaying in Presence

Optimize the source power and the relay weights with the aid of

[80]

of Multiple Eavesdroppers

full CSI such that the secrecy rate is maximized.

K. Cao et al. [81]

Cooperative

Provide a joint optimization of the artificial noise and the power

Jamming

Network in Presence of

allocated between the source and the relays.

Multiple Eavesdroppers
K. Cao et al. [82]

MIMOME and a Multi-

Propose a joint optimization of precoder and power allocation

Antenna Helper

between the source and the helper

transmission, carefully designed codes are also capable of securing the transmitted
messages against an eavesdropper. On the other hand, it seems intriguing to design
these codes because they are required to meet two conflicting requirements: 1) they tend
to add more redundancy to the codewords in order to counter the randomness of the
channel and provide reliable communication. 2) in order to offer a secure transmission,
they need to maximize the randomness perceived at the eavesdropper by reducing the

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

34

redundancy.
An important step towards designing codes for the wiretap channel is choosing a
metric for measuring security. In contrast to measuring reliability where probability
of error is being used as a universally accepted metric, there are multiple metrics for
quantifying secrecy for this scenario as listed in Table I. Computation of these metrics
for explicit finite length coding schemes, however, has been limited to some specific
channels3 . One example is [83] in which the authors apply semantic secrecy to a finite
Reed-Muller code used over a binary erasure channel (BEC). For AWGN channels, a
BER based metric called security gap (as mentioned in Section II-D2) is widely used
by the research community, which is easily applicable to all practical coding schemes,
however, its relation to the information theoretic metrics is not established in a rigorous
manner.
Security gap is defined as the difference between the qualities (SNRs) of the main
and the eavesdropper’s channels. For AWGN channels without feedback, this value must
be greater than zero in order to result in a positive secrecy capacity (which equals to
the difference between the capacities of the main and the eavesdropper’s channels [13]).
Small security gaps are desirable because they make physical layer security achievable
even with a small degradation of the eavesdropper’s channel with respect to the main
one. An analytical definition of the security gap can be given as follows. Let us fix
two threshold values for the maximum desired BER over the main channel (denoted by
PBmax ≤ 21 ) and and the minimum desired BER at the eavesdropper (denoted by PEmin > 0).
Then, the security gap equals the difference between the SNR values corresponding to
these two, i.e., SN RB − SN RE measured in dB.
The major shortcoming of the above BER-based analysis is that it assumes that if
3

The authors in [98] provide a coding scheme for an AWGN channel, which satisfy strong secrecy using capacity

approaching codes of infinite length and hash functions.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

35

min ≈ 0.5, then Eve cannot extract any information about the secret message. However,
Peve

if there exist statistical correlations between the input bit errors and the output bit errors
or there exist correlations among the output bit errors, the amount of leaked information
will not be zero. The authors in [89] employ tools from cryptography literature to eliminate such correlations. Specifically, they propose the use of the substitution permutation
networks (SPNs) without any secret key to satisfy the strict avalanche criteria (SAC) and
the bit independence criterion (BIC). The required SPNs can be implemented efficiently
[89], hence, they can be applied to the message bits before the encoding stage. Therefore,
one can design practical coding schemes, which result in BER very close to 0.5 with
no (or, small) correlation at Eve.
The general coding scheme for physical layer security is the randomized encoding
proposed by Wyner in [10] to prove that there exists a code which achieves the secrecy
capacity of the degraded wiretap channel. This method is also known as coset-coding
studied further in the subsequent literature, e.g., in [84] and [85]. In this method, allzero message is mapped to a code C with generator matrix G, and a non-zero message
s = [s1 , s2 , ..., sk ] is mapped to the coset obtained by adding the n-tuple s1 h1 + s2 h2 +
... + sk hk to all the codewords in C where hi ’s are linearly independent n-tuples outside
C. Assuming hi ’s form a matrix H of size k × n, the transmitted codeword through the
channel is

⎡ ⎤
⎢H⎥
⎢ ⎥
c = [s v] ⎢⎢ ⎥⎥
(18)
⎢G⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ ⎦
where v = [v1 , v2 , ..., vr ] denotes the random bit vector used for choosing a codeword in

the corresponding coset uniformly randomly. Fig. 6 illustrates this method where small
code is denoted by C and cij denotes the ith codeword in the j th coset. We note that
in conventional encoding, the leakage of information about the secret message to Eve,
H(SK ∣Zn ), is equal to the leakage of the codewords H(cn ∣Zn ) [83] since there is a oneto-one mapping between the messages and the codewords. In the randomized encoding
February 20, 2018

DRAFT

36

Fig. 6: Illustration of the coset coding scheme.

scheme, however, this is not true anymore since different codewords may represent the
same message.
Application of lattice codes to the Gaussian wiretap channel is studied in [86] where
the authors define an alternative security metric (called secrecy gain), which is related
to the theta series of lattices and shows the amount of confusion at the eavesdropper.
Without introducing a decoding method, they evaluate the performance of different
lattices based on the secrecy gain. The confusion at the eavesdropper in [86] is the result
of using a random lattice in addition to the lattice that is responsible for transmitting
the original message. As a further development, the authors in [87] prove the existence
of lattices that are semantically secure in the Gaussian wiretap channel.
The authors in [96] and [97] provide a lower bound on the mutual information between
the secret message and Eve’s observation. They utilize this lower bound to quantify the
equivocation for finite length codes for Gaussian wiretap channels. Specifically, they use
finite length LDPC codes and demonstrate the achievable points in the equivocation-rate

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

37

TABLE IX: Practical coding schemes aiming at reducing the security gap over AWGN
channel.
Paper

Secure coding scheme

Contributions

D. Klinc et al. [88]

Punctured LDPC codes

Propose puncturing information bits in LDPC codes in
order to confuse Eve.

M. Baldi et al. [90]

Non-systematic codes

Make use of scrambling technique at encoding which
amplifies the resulting errors at decoding stage.

M. Baldi et al. [91]

Y. X. Zhang et al. [93]

Coding with scrambling, con-

Investigate different techniques to reduce the resulting

catenation, and HARQ

security gaps.

Polar-LDPC

Evaluate performance of a serially concatenated coding

concatenated

codes

scheme consists of polar and LDPC codes.

A. Nooraiepour and T. M.

Randomized convolutional and

Construct coset codes based on convolutional and turbo

Duman [92]

turbo codes

codes using dual codes.

region.
Several practical coding schemes aiming directly at reducing the security gap are also
proposed in the literature. Specifically, punctured LDPC codes are exploited for physical
layer security in [88]. Furthermore, [90] demonstrates how non-systematic codes can be
effective to reduce the resulting security gap, while [91] applies different techniques
including scrambling, concatenation, and hybrid automatic repeat-request to LDPC and
BCH codes in order to further reduce the security gap. Concatenation of polar and
LDPC codes are proposed in [93]. Coset codes based on convolutional and turbo codes
are constructed in [92] and [94] for physical layer security. Finally, application of serially
concatenated low density generator matrix (SCLDGM) codes to the randomized scheme
is studied in [95]. Table IX summarizes the existing practical coding schemes in the
literature along with their main contributions. Fig. 7 demonstrates the relation between

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

38

0.5

0.45

min
BER at the Eavesdropper (Peve
)

0.4

0.35

0.3

0.25

0.2

0.15

RC, n=2056, k=1020, r=252
Punctured LDPC, n=2364, k=1576
RSCCC, n=8004, k=r=2000
RSCLDGM, n=10004, k=2250, r=250
S RSCCC, n=10004, k=r=2500
S RSCLDGM, n=10004, k=2250, r=250

0.1

0.05

0

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5
3
Security gap (dB)

3.5

4

4.5

5

Fig. 7: The resulting security gaps from practical coding schemes. n, k and r denote
length of a code, number of data bits and number of random bits, respectively. S means
scrambling has been applied. Taken from [92] and [95].

the resulting security gaps from some of these practical coding schemes4 and a specific
BER at Eve. One can see that when a BER of 0.5 is desired at Eve, security gaps as
small as 1 dB can be obtained using carefully designed codes of length 104 or longer.
Authors in [98] introduce a method, which provides strong secrecy for the Gaussian
wiretap channel by means of hash functions and capacity approaching channel codes
of infinite length. Using this scheme, it is also possible to quantify the level of leakage
obtained for a fixed block length. Finally, [99] provides the maximal secrecy rate over
4

RSCCC stands for randomized serially concatenated convolutional codes scheme, RC stands for randomized

convolutional codes scheme and RSCLDGM corresponds to the randomized SCLDGM codes.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

39

a wiretap channel subject to reliability and secrecy constraints at a given block length.
In addition to the Gaussian wiretap channels, some efforts are also made to develop
practical coding schemes for fading wiretap channels. The authors in [100] and [101]
propose polar coding schemes for achieving secrecy over block fading wiretap channels.
In [100], the secure coding scheme is designed with the aid of instantaneous MCSI and
ECSI. However, the polar coding approach proposed in [101] relies on statistical CSI of
both channels. Application of algebraic lattice codes is also proposed over block fading
wiretap channels. For instance, a sequence of non-random lattice codes is developed in
[102] that achieve strong secrecy and semantic security over ergodic fading channels.
We emphasize that the easy-to-compute property of security gap makes it a widely
used metric in majority of the aforementioned code designs, which try to avoid potential
complexities associated with computing the original information-theoretic metrics for
finite-length scenarios. Despite some limited efforts such as [97] in providing a lower
bound for information-theoretic metrics (Table I), the literature of physical layer security
still lacks a comprehensive and satisfactory finite length analysis of different metrics
especially for AWGN and fading wiretap channels.
VIII. L ESSONS L EARNED AND THE C HALLENGES A HEAD
We now provide a number of important conclusions that can be drawn from the
existing results for different wiretap channels driven by finite-alphabet inputs. We also
discuss a number of challenges ahead and present some directions for future research
in this area.

A. Concluding Remarks
An obligatory step towards practical implementation of physical layer security is understanding the impacts of employing standard constellations on the secrecy performance.
The usual approaches for designing secure transmit signals with Gaussian inputs lead
February 20, 2018

DRAFT

40

to considerable losses when applied to the signals drawn from finite constellations. This
fact motivates the need for development of secure transmission schemes under the finitealphabet input assumption.
In single-antenna transmission with constellation constrained inputs, achieving secrecy
requires adoption of a proper power allocation strategy. This is because transmission with
full power may allow the eavesdropper to successfully detect the transmitted symbols.
Moreover, the increased dimensionality in multi-antenna transmissions can be employed
to enhance secrecy under finite-alphabet inputs. Precoding serves as a promising strategy
for maximizing the quality difference between the signals received at the legitimate
receiver and the eavesdropper. Artificial noise injection serves as a promising strategy
for enhancing secrecy and it well-suits the nature of secure transmission with finitealphabet inputs since the optimal power, which is allocated to the information bearing
signal is only a fraction of the total power, and the excess power can be used for artificial
noise injection. In many cases (especially, in the absence of instantaneous ECSI), without
artificial noise injection, secrecy rates drop to zero when the transmit power increases.
Therefore, injecting artificial noise is crucial for guaranteeing a good saturation behavior
at high SNRs.
The optimal secure transmission schemes are not known in closed-form in almost all
of the scenarios studied in this survey. This is due to the non-convexity of the objective
function (i.e., secrecy rate). Furthermore, the transmit signal design algorithms, which
rely on direct maximization of secrecy rates are computationally complex mainly due to
the fact that the mutual information expression under finite-alphabet inputs lacks closedform. Therefore, different studies focus their attention on proposing lower-complexity
alternatives to direct secrecy rate maximization. There is also an important trade-off
between the secrecy rates and the computational complexity of the existing solutions
in the literature of physical layer security with finite alphabet inputs. Moreover, it is

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

41

noteworthy that the transmit signal designs based on the metrics such as SINR or BER,
though simple and may be practical in some scenarios, do not ensure secrecy in an
information theoretic sense.
The amount of CSI at the transmitter plays a central role in determining the secrecy
performance of a particular transmission scheme. Transmission algorithms employing full
CSI typically have a high capability in simultaneously increasing the information rates
at the legitimate receiver and suppressing the reception at the eavesdropper, however,
acquiring a perfect instantaneous CSI of the eavesdropper may not be practically possible
in many scenarios. Although the achievable secrecy rates undergo considerable losses
in the absence of instantaneous ECSI, the existing approaches reveal that high secrecy
rates can still be attained with (or in some cases even without) it.
Practical coding schemes exploit different tools from coding theory and cryptography
in order to ensure a certain level of security and reliability (in terms of BERs) for Eve
and Bob, respectively. By combining coset coding and scrambling approaches along with
code concatenation, security gaps as small as 1 dB can be obtained using finite-length
explicit and implementable codes. However, finding specific (and implementable) finitelength codes, which can provide physical layer security from an information-theoretic
point of view, remains as a future challenge.
B. Challenges and Open Problems
Various studies have been carried out on physical layer security with discrete signaling
with the objective of bridging the gap between information theoretic limits of secrecy to
practical and implementable secure transmission schemes. However, there still are many
important open problems and future challenges to be addressed in this area.
Physical layer security with finite-alphabet inputs has been studied only for a limited
set of CSI scenarios including the cases with perfect and statistical MCSI and ECSI at
the transmitter. Some other important scenarios regarding the CSI uncertainty at different
February 20, 2018

DRAFT

42

nodes, e.g., noisy estimation of CSI, outdated CSI or limited CSI feedback, which are
well-investigated under the Gaussian input assumption [7], have not yet been considered
for cases with finite-alphabet inputs. It would be interesting and of significant practical
value to quantify the losses in the secrecy rates under these different imperfect CSI
scenarios in the context of finite-alphabet inputs.
While the majority of artificial noise injection strategies rely on transmitting Gaussian
distributed noise either by aligning it in the null-space of the main channel or by optimizing its covariance matrix, such artificial noise signals are not necessarily optimal. For
instance, it has been shown in [103] that the worst case noise for AWGN channels with
binary inputs has a discrete distribution. This motivates seeking interference distributions
(rather than merely optimizing covariance matrices of Gaussian distributed signals),
which maximize secrecy rates.
While some steps have been taken in studying physical layer security over finite-input
multiuser networks (as surveyed in Section VI), many important scenarios have not yet
been tackled. For example, no results have been reported for interference channels with
secrecy constraints under the finite-alphabet input assumption. Secrecy issues concerning
the networks with simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) is also
a topic of recent interest [104]. It is demonstrated that SWIPT networks are prone to
information leakage at the energy receivers, and hence, the main focus of the existing
articles is the characterization of the trade-off between the secrecy capacity/rate and the
harvested power in these networks [105]-[107]. Studying this trade-off under practical
discrete signaling assumption is an important subject for future research. Furthermore,
physical layer security in heterogeneous networks [108] and with full duplex transmitter
or receivers (see, e.g. [109]) are other hot topics in this area, and extending the existing results for these scenarios to the case of finite-alphabet inputs constitutes another
important direction for future research.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

43

Massive MIMO [110] and millimeter wave (mmWave) communication systems [111]
have attracted significant interest from researchers in industry and academia. Exploiting
large antenna arrays and taking advantage of a spectrum from 30 GHz to 300 GHz
away from the almost fully occupied spectral band, have proven to provide various
benefits, which make these technologies promising candidates for the next generation
wireless systems and beyond. With this motivation, investigating the potentials of massive
MIMO and mmWave communications in providing physical layer security has been of
recent interest (see e.g., [112]-[114] and [115]-[117]). Besides opportunities offered,
many challenges arise in secure transmit signal designs with finite-alphabet inputs. For
instance, most of the existing precoder design approaches (such as the ones proposed
in [33] and [40]) are intractable when the number of antennas is high. Furthermore,
communicating at the mmWave spectrum considerably changes the channel model with
respect to the microwave communication systems, and introduces some new features
(e.g., high sensitivity to blockages and considerable differences between the line-of-sight
and non-line-of-sight receptions), which motivates development of new frameworks for
designing practical secure transmission schemes.
The main problem associated with designing practical coding schemes for physical
layer security is the following: Although security gap is proposed and used as an
alternative practical metric, the most widely accepted one (i.e., equivocation) relies on
information theoretic quantities, and computing these quantities for finite-length codes
over AWGN channels is a challenging problem, and can be a promising research direction
on physical layer security. As a final suggestion for future research, we recommend the
problem of precoder design in the scenarios where practical wiretap codes are employed,
which would be an important step towards designing implementable secure transmission
schemes.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

44

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey
(TUBITAK) under grant #113E223.

R EFERENCES
[1] Y. Liang, H. V. Poor, and S. Shamai, Information theoretic security, Found. Trends Commun. Inf. Theory, vol.
5, no. 4-5, pp. 355-580, 2008.
[2] R. Liu and W. Trappe, Securing wireless communications at the physical layer, Springer, 2010.
[3] E. A. Jorswieck, A. Wolf, and S. Gerbracht, “Trends in telecommunications technologies,” in Secrecy on the
Physical Layer in Wireless Networks. Croatia, InTech, 2010.
[4] M. Bloch and J. Barros, Physical-layer security: from information theory to security engineering, Cambridge,
2011.
[5] A. Mukherjee, S. A. A. Fakoorian, J. Huang, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “Principles of physical layer security
in multiuser wireless networks: A survey,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1550–1573, Aug.
2014.
[6] W. Trappe, “The challenges facing physical layer security,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 16–20,
Jun. 2015.
[7] A. Hyadi, Z. Rezki and M. S. Alouini, “An overview of physical layer security in wireless communication
systems with CSIT uncertainty,” in IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 6121–6132, Oct. 2016.
[8] X. Chen, D. W. K. Ng, W. H. Gerstacker and H. H. Chen, “A survey on multiple-antenna techniques for
physical layer security,” in IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1027–1053, Second Quarter 2017.
[9] M. Bellare, S. Tessaro, and A. Vardy, “Semantic security for the wiretap channel,” in Proc. 32nd Annu. Cryptol.
Conf., vol. 7417. 2012, pp. 294–311.
[10] A. D. Wyner, “The wire-tap channel,” Bell Sys. Tech. J., vol. 54, pp. 1355–1387, 1975.
[11] C. E. Shannon, “Communication theory of secrecy systems,” Bell Sys. Tech. J., vol. 28, pp. 656–715, 1949.
[12] U. M. Maurer and S. Wolf, “From weak to strong information-theoretic key agreement,” in IEEE Int’l. Symp.
Info. Theory (ISIT), p. 18, Sorrento, Italy, Jun. 2000.
[13] S. L. Y. Cheong and M. Hellman, “The Gaussian wire-tap channel,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 24, no. 4,
pp. 451–456, July 1978.
[14] I. Csiszar and J. Korner, “Broadcast channels with confidential messages,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 24,
no. 3, pp. 339–348, May 1978.
[15] J. Barros and M. R. D. Rodrigues, “Secrecy Capacity of Wireless Channels,” IEEE Int’l. Symp. Info. Theory
(ISIT), July 2006, pp. 356–360.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

45

[16] P. Gopala, L. Lai, and H. El Gamal, “On the secrecy capacity of fading channels”, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory,
vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 4687–4698, Oct. 2008.
[17] J. Li and A. P. Petropulu, “On ergodic secrecy rate for Gaussian MISO wiretap channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless
Commun., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1176-–1187, Apr. 2011.
[18] P.-H. Lin and E. Jorswieck, “On the fast fading Gaussian wiretap channel with statistical channel state
information at the transmitter,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 46–58, Jan. 2016.
[19] A. Khisti and G. Wornell, “Secure transmission with multiple antennas II: the MIMOME wiretap channel,”
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 5515–5532, Nov. 2010.
[20] F. Oggier, B. Hassibi, “The secrecy capacity of the MIMO wiretap channel,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 57,
no. 8, pp. 4961–4972, 2011.
[21] T. Liu and S. Shamai, “A note on the secrecy capacity of the multiple antenna wiretap channel,” IEEE Trans.
Inf. Theory, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2547–2553, Jun. 2009.
[22] Q. Li, M. Hong, H. T. Wai, Y. F. Liu, W. K. Ma and Z. Q. Luo, “Transmit solutions for MIMO wiretap
channels using alternating optimization,” in IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1714-1727, Sep.
2013.
[23] S. Loyka and C. D. Charalambous, “An algorithm for global maximization of secrecy rates in Gaussian MIMO
wiretap channels,” in IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 2288-2299, Jun. 2015.
[24] D. Klinc, J. Ha, S. W. McLaughlin, J. Barros, and B.-J. Kwak, “LDPC codes for the Gaussian wiretap channel,”
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 532–540, Sep. 2011.
[25] W.-C. Liao, T.-H. Chang, W.-K. Ma, and C.-Y. Chi, “QoS-based transmit beamforming in the presence of
eavesdroppers: An optimized artificial-noise aided approach,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 59, no. 3,
pp. 1202–1216, Mar. 2011.
[26] G. D. Raghava and B. S. Rajan, “Secrecy capacity of the Gaussian wiretap channel with finite complex
constellation input,” [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.1163, Oct. 2010.
[27] M. R. D. Rodrigues, A. Somekh-Baruch, and M. Bloch, “On Gaussian wiretap channels with M-PAM inputs,”
in Proc. EWConf., Apr. 2010, pp. 774–781.
[28] E. Biglieri, Coding for wireless channels, Springer-Verlag New York, 2005.
[29] C. Qi, Y. Chen, and A. J. Vinck. “On the Binary Input Gaussian Wiretap Channel with/without Output
Quantization,” Entropy, vol. 19, no. 2, Feb. 2017.
[30] Z. Li, R. Yates and W. Trappe, “Achieving secret communication for fast Rayleigh fading channels,” in IEEE
Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 2792-2799, Sep. 2010.
[31] S. Goel and R. Negi, “Guaranteeing secrecy using artificial noise,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 7, no.
6, pp. 2180–2189, Jun. 2008.
[32] S. Bashar, Z. Ding, and C. Xiao, “On secrecy rate analysis of MIMO wiretap channels driven by finite-alphabet
input,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 3816–3825, Dec. 2012.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

46

[33] Y. Wu, C. Xiao, Z. Ding, X. Gao, and S. Jin, “Linear precoding for finite-alphabet signaling over MIMOME
wiretap channels,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 2599–2612, Jul. 2012.
[34] A. Khisti and G. W. Wornell, “Secure transmission with multiple antennas—Part I: The MISOME wiretap
channel,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 3088–3104, Jul. 2010.
[35] M. R. A. Khandaker, C. Masouros, K. Wong, “Constructive interference based secure precoding: a new
dimension in physical layer security,” [Online]. Available: arxiv.org/abs/1612.08465, Dec. 2016.
[36] H. Reboredo, J. Xavier, and M. R. D. Rodrigues, “Filter design with secrecy constrains: The MIMO Gaussian
wiretap channel,“IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 61, pp. 3799–3814, Aug. 2013.
[37] T. V. Nguyen, T. Q. S. Quek, Y. H. Kim, and H. Shin, “Secrecy diversity in MISOME wiretap channels,” in
Proc. Global Commun. Conf. (Globecom’2012), Aneheim, USA, Dec. 2012, pp. 4840–4845.
[38] S. Bashar, Z. Ding, and C. Xiao, “On the secrecy rate of multi-antenna wiretap channel under finite-alphabet
input,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 527-–529, May 2011.
[39] S. Rezaei Aghdam and T. M. Duman, “Low complexity precoding for MIMOME wiretap channels based on
cut-off rate,” IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory (ISIT 2016), Barcelona, Jul. 2016, pp. 2988–2992.
[40] S. Rezaei Aghdam, T. M. Duman, “Joint precoder and artificial noise design for MIMO wiretap channels with
finite-alphabet inputs based on the cut-off rate,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 3913–3923,
Jun. 2017.
[41] P.-H. Lin S.-H. Lai, S.-C. Lin, and H.-J. Su, “On secrecy rate of the generalized artificial-noise assisted secure
beamforming for wiretap channels,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1728–1740, Sep. 2013.
[42] A. Kalantari, M. Soltanalian, S. Maleki, S. Chatzinotas, and B. Ottersten, “Secure M-PSK communication via
directional modulation,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, Shanghai, China, Mar. 2016, pp. 3481—3485
[43] A. Kalantari, M. Soltanalian, S. Maleki, S. Chatzinotas and B. Ottersten, “Directional modulation via symbollevel precoding: A way to enhance security,” in IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 10, no. 8, pp.
1478-1493, Dec. 2016.
[44] L. Zhang, Y. Cai, B. Champagne, and M. Zhao, “Tomlinson-Harashima precoding design in MIMO wiretap
channels based on the MMSE criterion,” in Proc. IEEE ICC, pp. 470-474, Jun. 2015.
[45] S. A. A. Fakoorian, H. Jafarkhani, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “Secure space-time block coding via artificial
noise alignment,” in Proc. Conf. Rec. 45th ASILOMAR (ASILOMAR’2011), Pacific Grove, USA, Nov. 2011,
pp. 651–655.
[46] M. A. Girnyk, M. Vehkapera, J. Yuan, and L. K. Rasmussen, “On the ergodic secrecy capacity of MIMO wiretap
channels with statistical CSI,” in Proc. Int. Symp. Inf. Theory Appl. (ISITA), Melbourne, VIC, Australia, Oct.
2014, pp. 398–402.
[47] S. Rezaei Aghdam, T. M. Duman, “Transmit signal design for MIMO wiretap channels with statistical CSI
and arbitrary inputs,” accepted in IEEE PIMRC 2017.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

47

[48] X. Li, R. Fan, X. Ma, J. An, and T. Jiang, “Secure space-time communications over Rayleigh flat fading
channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, pp. 1491–1504, Feb. 2016.
[49] H. M. Furqan, J. M. Hamamreh and H. Arslan, “Secret key generation using channel quantization with SVD
for reciprocal MIMO channels,” ISWCS, Poznan, Sep. 2016, pp. 597–602.
[50] W. Zeng, C. Xiao, M. Wang, and J. Lu, “Linear precoding for finite-alphabet inputs over MIMO fading channels
with statistical CSI,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 60, no. 7, Jul. 2012.
[51] M. A. Girnyk, F. Gabry, M. Vehkapera, L. K. Rasmussen, and M. Skoglund, “On the transmit beamforming for
MIMO wiretap channels: Large-system analysis,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Theoretic Secur. (ICITS), Singapore,
Nov. 2013, pp. 90–102.
[52] M. A. Girnyk, F. Gabry, M. Vehkapera, L. K. Rasmussen and M. Skoglund, “MIMO wiretap channels
with randomly located eavesdroppers: Large-system analysis,” 2015 IEEE International Conference on
Communication Workshop (ICCW), London, Jun. 2015, pp. 480-484.
[53] Y. Wu, J. Wang, J. Wang, R. Schober, and C. Xiao, “Large-scale MIMO secure transmission with finite alphabet
inputs,” [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.08328.pdf, Dec. 2016.
[54] R. Mesleh, H. Haas, S. Sinanovic, C. W. Ahn, and S. Yun, “Spatial modulation,” IEEE Trans. on Vehic.
Technol., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2228–2241, 2008.
[55] J. Jeganathan, A. Ghrayeb, L. Szeczecinski, A. Ceron, “Space shift keying modulation for MIMO channels,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 3692-3703, Jul. 2009.
[56] M. Di Renzo, H. Haas, A. Ghrayeb, S. Suguira and L. Hanzo “Spatial modulation for generalized MIMO:
challenges, opportunities and implementation,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 56–103, 2014.
[57] S. Sinanovic, N. Serafimovski, M. Di Renzo, and H. Haas, “Secrecy capacity of space keying with two
antennas,” in 2012 IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf. (VTC Fall), Sep. 2012, pp. 1–5.
[58] X. Guan, Y. Cai, and W. Yang, “On the secrecy mutual information of spatial modulation with finite alphabet,”
in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Wireless Commun. Signal Process. (WCSP), Oct. 2012, pp. 1–4
[59] S. Rezaei Aghdam, T. M. Duman and M. Di Renzo, “On secrecy rate analysis of spatial modulation and space
shift keying,”, IEEE BlackSeaCom 2015, pp. 63–67, May 2015.
[60] S. Rezaei Aghdam and T. M. Duman, “Physical layer security for space shift keying transmission with
precoding,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 180-–183, Apr. 2016.
[61] F. Wu, L. L. Yang, W. Wang and Z. Kong, “Secret precoding-aided spatial modulation,” in IEEE Commun.
Lett., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1544–1547, Sep. 2015.
[62] L. Wang, S. Bashar, Y. Wei, and R. Li, “Secrecy enhancement analysis against unknown eavesdropping in
spatial modulation,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1351—1354, Aug. 2015.
[63] Z. Huang, Z. Gao and L. Sun, “Anti-eavesdropping scheme based on quadrature spatial modulation,” in IEEE
Commun. Lett., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 532-535, Mar. 2017.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

48

[64] Q.-L. Li, “Information-guided randomization for wireless physical layer secure transmission,” in Proc. IEEE
Military Commun. Conf., Orlando, FL, USA, Nov. 2012, pp. 1–6.
[65] S. Rezaei Aghdam and T. M. Duman, “Secure space shift keying transmission using dynamic antenna index
assignment,” accepted in IEEE GLOBECOM 2017, Dec. 2017.
[66] Y. Wei, L. Wang and T. Svensson, “Analysis of secrecy rate against eavesdroppers in MIMO modulation
systems,” 2015 Int. Conf. Wireless Commun. Signal Process. (WCSP), Nanjing, Oct. 2015, pp. 1-5.
[67] Z. Li, R. D. Yates, and W. Trappe, “Secrecy capacity of independent parallel channels,” in 44th Annual Allerton
CCC, Sep. 2006.
[68] F. Renna, N. Laurenti, and H. V. Poor, “Physical-layer secrecy for OFDM transmissions over fading channels,”
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Security, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1354–1367, Aug. 2012.
[69] F. Renna, N. Laurenti, and H. V. Poor, “Achievable secrecy rates for wiretap OFDM with QAM constellations,”
in Proc. 5th Int. ICST Conf. Perform. Eval. Method. VALUETOOLS, Paris, France, 2011, pp. 679—686.
[70] M. Yusuf and H. Arslan, “Controlled inter-carrier interference for physical layer security in OFDM systems,”
2016 IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf. (VTC Fall), Montreal, QC, 2016, pp. 1-5.
[71] H. Li, X. Wang and J. Y. Chouinard, ”Eavesdropping-resilient OFDM system using sorted subcarrier
interleaving,” in IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1155-1165, Feb. 2015.
[72] H. Qin, Y. Sun, T. Chang, X. Chen,; C. Chi, M. Zhao, J. Wang, “Power allocation and time-domain artificial
noise design for wiretap OFDM with discrete inputs,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 12, no. 6, pp.
2717—2729, Jun. 2013.
[73] T. Akitaya, S. Asano, and T. Saba, “Time-domain artificial noise generation technique using time-domain and
frequency-domain processing for physical layer security in MIMO-OFDM systems,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf.
Commun. Workshops (ICCW), Jun. 2014, pp. 807-–812.
[74] Z. Mheich, F. Alberge, and P. Duhamel, “Achievable secrecy rates for the broadcast channel with confidential
message and finite constellation inputs,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 195–205, Jan. 2015.
[75] T. Allen, A. Tajer and N. Al-Dhahir, “Secure Alamouti MAC transmissions,” in IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.,
vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 3674-3687, Jun. 2017.
[76] J. Jin, C. Xiao, M. Tao and W. Chen, “Linear precoding for cognitive multiple access wiretap channel with
finite-alphabet inputs,” 2016 IEEE ICC, Kuala Lumpur, May 2016, pp. 1-6.
[77] W. Zeng, Y. R. Zheng and C. Xiao, “Multiantenna secure cognitive radio networks with finite-alphabet inputs:
a global optimization approach for precoder design,” in IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 4, pp.
3044-3057, Apr. 2016.
[78] K. Cao, Y. Cai, Y. Wu, W. Yang and X. Guan, “Secure communication for MISO secrecy channel with multiple
multiantenna eavesdroppers having finite alphabet inputs,” in IEEE Access, vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1-1.
[79] S. Vishwakarma and A. Chockalingam, “Power allocation in MIMO wiretap channel with statistical CSI and
finite-alphabet input,” 2014 SPCOM, Bangalore, Jul. 2014, pp. 1-6.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

49

[80] S. Vishwakarma and A. Chockalingam, “Decode-and-forward relay beamforming for secrecy with finitealphabet input,” in IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 912-915, May 2013.
[81] K. Cao, Y. Cai, Y. Wu and W. Yang, “Cooperative jamming for secure communication with finite alphabet
inputs,” in IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 2025-2028, Sep. 2017.
[82] K. Cao, Y. Wu, Y. Cai and W. Yang, ”Secure transmission with aid of a helper for MIMOME network having
finite alphabet inputs,” in IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 3698-3708, Feb. 2017.
[83] M. R. Bloch, M. Hayashi, and A. Thangaraj, “Error-control coding for physical-layer secrecy,” Proceedings of
IEEE, vol. 103, no. 10, pp. 1725–1746, Oct. 2015.
[84] L. H. Ozarow and A. D. Wyner, “Wire-tap channel II,” Bell Lab. Tech. J., vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 2135-2157, Dec.
1984.
[85] G. Cohen and G. Zemor, “Syndrome-coding for the wiretap channel revisited,” in Proc. IEEE Information
Theory Workshop, Chengdu, China, Oct. 2006, pp. 33–36.
[86] F. Oggier, P. Sole and J. Belfiore, “Lattice codes for the wiretap Gaussian channel: construction and analysis,”
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 5690-5707, Oct. 2016.
[87] C. Ling, L. Luzzi, J.-C. Belfiore, and D. Stehlé, “Semantically secure lattice codes for the Gaussian wiretap
channel,” Computing Research Repository, Oct. 2012, pp. 1–19.
[88] D. Klinc, J. Ha, S. M. McLaughlin, J. Barros, and B.-J. Kwak, “LDPC codes for the Gaussian wiretap channel,”
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 532-540, Sep. 2011.
[89] I. M. Kim, B. H. Kim, and J. K. Ahn, “BER-based physical layer security with finite code length: Combining
strong converse and error amplification,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, pp. 3844-3857, Sep. 2016.
[90] M. Baldi, M. Bianchi, and F. Chiaraluce, “Non-systematic codes for physical layer security,” in Proc. IEEE
Information Theory Workshop (ITW 2010), Dublin, Ireland, Aug. 2010.
[91] M. Baldi, F. Bambozzi, and F. Chiaraluce, “Coding with scrambling, concatenation, and HARQ for the AWGN
wire-tap channel: A security gap analysis,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 883—894,
Jun. 2012.
[92] A. Nooraiepour and T. M. Duman, “Randomized convolutional codes for the wiretap channel,” in IEEE Trans.
Commun., vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 3442-3452, Aug. 2017.
[93] Y. X. Zhang, A. Liu, “Polar-LDPC concatenated coding for the AWGN wiretap channel,” IEEE Commun.
Lett., vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1683-1686, Oct. 2014.
[94] A. Nooraiepour and T. M. Duman “Randomized turbo codes for the wiretap channel,” in IEEE GLOBECOM,
Singapore, Dec. 2017.
[95] A. Nooraiepour and Tolga M. Duman, “Randomized serially concatenated LDGM codes for the Gaussian
wiretap channel,” Accepted for publication in IEEE Commun. Lett., Dec. 2017.
[96] C. W. Wong, T. F. Wong, and J. M. Shea, “LDPC code design for the BPSK-constrained Gaussian wiretap
channel,” in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM 2011 Workshops, Houston, TX, Dec. 2011, pp. 898–902.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

50

[97] M. Baldi, G. Ricciutelli, N. Maturo, and F. Chiaraluce, “Performance assessment and design of finite length
LDPC codes for the gaussian wiretap channel,” IEEE ICC 2015 Workshop on Physical-Layer Security, Jun.
2015, pp. 435-440.
[98] H. Tyagi and A. Vardy, “Explicit capacity-achieving coding scheme for the Gaussian wire- tap channel,” in
IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory, Jul. 2014, pp. 956—960.
[99] W. Yang, R. F. Schaefer, and H. V. Poor, “Finite-blocklength bounds for wiretap channels,” in IEEE Int. Symp.
Inf. Theory, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 3087—3091, Jul. 2016.
[100] M. Zheng, M. Tao, and W. Chen., “Polar coding for secure transmission in MISO fading wiretap channels.”
[Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2463, Nov. 2014.
[101] H. Si, O. O. Koyluoglu and S. Vishwanath, “Hierarchical Polar Coding for Achieving Secrecy Over StateDependent Wiretap Channels Without Any Instantaneous CSI,” in IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, no. 9, pp.
3609-3623, Sep. 2016.
[102] L. Luzzi, C. Ling and R. Vehkalahti, “Almost universal codes for fading wiretap channels,” IEEE Int. Symp.
Inf. Theory (ISIT), Barcelona, Jul. 2016, pp. 3082-3086.
[103] S. Shamai and S. Verdu, “Worst-case power-constrained noise for binary input channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf.
Theory, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1494- 1511, Sep. 1992.
[104] X. Chen, D. W. K. Ng, and H.-H. Chen, “Secrecy wireless information and power transfer: challenges and
opportunities,” IEEE Commun. Mag., May 2016.
[105] R. Zhang and C. K. Ho, “MIMO broadcasting for simultaneous wireless information and power transfer,” IEEE
Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1989-–2001, May 2013.
[106] J. Zhang, C. Yuen, C. K. Wen, S. Jin, K. K. Wong and H. Zhu, “Large system secrecy rate analysis for SWIPT
MIMO wiretap channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 74–85, Jan. 2016.
[107] K. Banawan and S. Ulukus, “MIMO wiretap channel under receiver side power constraints with applications
to wireless information transfer and cognitive radio,” IEEE Trans. on Commun., vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 3872–3885,
Sep. 2016.
[108] H. M. Wang, T. X. Zheng, J. Yuan, D. Towsley and M. H. Lee, “Physical layer security in heterogeneous
cellular networks,” in IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 1204-1219, Mar. 2016.
[109] Y. Zhou, Z. Z. Xiang, Y. Zhu, and Z. Xue, “Application of full-duplex wireless technique into secure MIMO
communication: Achievable secrecy rate based optimization,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 21, pp. 804–808,
Jul. 2014.
[110] E. Larsson et al., “Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 52, no.
2, Feb. 2014, pp. 186–95.
[111] T. Rappaport et al., “Millimeter wave mobile communications for 5G cellular: It will work!,” IEEE Access,
vol. 1, May 2013, pp. 335–49.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

51

[112] J. Wang, J. Lee, F. Wang, and T. Q. S. Quek, “Jamming-aided secure communication in massive MIMO Rician
channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, pp. 6854–6868, Dec. 2015.
[113] K. Guo, Y. Guo, and G. Ascheid, “Security-constrained power allocation in mu-massive-MIMO with distributed
antennas,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, pp. 8139–8153, Dec. 2016.
[114] J. Zhu, R. Schober, and V. K. Bhargava, “Linear precoding of data and artificial noise in secure massive MIMO
systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, pp. 2245–2261, Mar. 2016.
[115] S. Vuppala, S. Biswas, and T. Ratnarajah, “An analysis on secure communication in millimeter/micro-wave
hybrid networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, pp. 3507–3519, Aug. 2016.
[116] C. Wang and H.-M. Wang, “Physical layer security in millimeter wave cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless
Commun., vol. 15, pp. 5569–5585, Aug. 2016.
[117] Y. Zhu, L. Wang, K. K. Wong and R. W. Heath, “Secure Communications in Millimeter Wave Ad Hoc
Networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 3205-3217, May 2017.

February 20, 2018

DRAFT

