Semi-Automatic Construction of a Domain Ontology for Wind
Energy Using Wikipedia Articles
Dilek Küçüka,∗, Yusuf Arslanb

arXiv:1410.8581v1 [cs.CL] 30 Oct 2014

b

a
Power Electronics Department, TÜBİTAK Energy Institute, 06531, Ankara, Turkey
Department of Computer Engineering, Middle East Technical University, 06531, Ankara, Turkey

Abstract
Domain ontologies are important information sources for knowledge-based systems. Yet,
building domain ontologies from scratch is known to be a very labor-intensive process. In
this study, we present our semi-automatic approach to building an ontology for the domain
of wind energy which is an important type of renewable energy with a growing share in
electricity generation all over the world. Related Wikipedia articles are first processed in
an automated manner to determine the basic concepts of the domain together with their
properties and next the concepts, properties, and relationships are organized to arrive at
the ultimate ontology. We also provide pointers to other engineering ontologies which could
be utilized together with the proposed wind energy ontology in addition to its prospective
application areas. The current study is significant as, to the best of our knowledge, it
proposes the first considerably wide-coverage ontology for the wind energy domain and the
ontology is built through a semi-automatic process which makes use of the related Web
resources, thereby reducing the overall cost of the ontology building process.
Keywords: wind energy, wind power, domain ontology, text mining, Web mining

Corresponding author. Tel: +90-312-2101310; fax: +90-312-2101315
Email addresses: dilek.kucuk@tubitak.gov.tr (Dilek Küçük), yusuf.arslan@ceng.metu.edu.tr
(Yusuf Arslan)
∗

Preprint submitted to Elsevier

November 3, 2014

1. Introduction
Renewable energy resources (such as wind, solar, and biomass, among others) have
emerged as an important engineering topic mainly due to the profound advantages of the
corresponding plants over conventional plants (such as fossil-fuelled and nuclear). Considering wind energy, the primary benefits of the wind energy plants are that (i) energy
production does not lead to environmental pollution and (ii) as wind is abundant in many
countries, the financial costs of these plants are comparably lower than that of the conventional plants [1]. Compared to the other renewable resources, wind is considerably variable
and hence it is hard to determine optimal places for wind power plant installations and to
forecast daily energy productions of the plants precisely. The latter point (the uncertainty
of the production) results in particular problems during the integration of these plants to
the electrical grid as the electricity transmission system operators should be informed of
prospective daily productions in advance to make short-term planning and to ensure that
the supply matches the demand [1]. Other directions of research on the topic include predictions for the economic viability of wind power plant projects and wind turbine design
[2]. As wind energy keeps increasing its share in the electricity generation (and annually
growing at a rate of 30% [3]), research projects targeting at these problems have started
to increase (such as [4]).
In this paper, we target at wind power applications from a knowledge-based perspective
and propose a wide-coverage domain ontology for wind energy domain1 . A domain ontology
1

In this study, we utilize the terms wind power and wind energy interchangeably to denote the electrical
power generated from wind through the wind turbines installed on the wind power plants (as they are
commonly used interchangeably and they denote wind generated power), although the terms power and
energy are quite distinct terms in physics.

2

is defined as a reusable vocabulary of concepts, relationships, and activities in the domain
along with the governing theories and principles [5]. Various domain ontologies have been
reported in the literature [6, 7, 8, 9, 10] and there is ongoing research on the topic along
with research on the Semantic Web. Although domain ontologies serve various purposes,
building them from scratch is too labor-intensive and time-consuming. Hence, we employ
a semi-automatic approach to build our wind energy ontology which comprises two main
phases: in the first phase, Wikipedia [11] articles on the topic are processed to learn the
concepts from highly frequent words and phrases (n-grams) and in the second phase, these
concepts are organized with their properties and relationships to arrive at the ultimate
ontology. Yet, the final form of the ontology is open to extensions as well, that is, other
concepts and properties covering more details about the domain can be added to the
ontology. It can also be integrated with other related engineering ontologies for better
coverage of the domain.
Ontology-based studies on wind power domain are rather limited. We come across
only three studies on the topic, the first of which [12] proposes an ontology on wind power
plant information and the resulting ontology comprises some generic concepts which are
not specific to wind power domain and moreover it basically aims to cover concepts related
to the management of wind power plant information. The second study [13] describes an
ontology for wind turbines condition monitoring and is more domain-specific compared to
the ontology proposed in [12]. Yet this study [13] also suffers from low coverage, i.e., it only
considers the semantics of wind turbines instead of the whole wind power domain. The
last related study [14] utilizes an ontology of facts to be utilized by a multi-agent system
which aims to control a photovoltaic (PV)-based microgrid. This ontology covers specific

3

facts or concepts related to agent operations which are far from representing the domain
of renewable energy or wind energy. Hence, to the best of our knowledge, in the current
study, we propose the first large-scale ontology for the wind power domain. Yet, as will
be emphasized in Section 3, this ontology can well be integrated with related engineering
ontologies and aligned with the aforementioned ontologies including [12, 13].
The rest of the paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, the ontology building process
for wind energy domain is presented in details. Section 3 is devoted to prospective integration opportunities with related engineering ontologies and plausible application areas
of the proposed ontology. Finally, Section 4 concludes the paper and provides pointers to
future work.

2. Building an Ontology for Wind Energy
Our semi-automatic ontology construction process for wind energy domain comprises
two main phases:
• Learning the concepts and properties of these concepts from related Wikipedia articles by extracting the frequent phrases as unigrams, bigrams, and trigrams from the
article texts. This phase executes in fully automated mode.
• Building the ontology by organizing these components and properties utilizing other
written information sources like related international standards and textbooks.
We provide the execution flow of the overall approach with more detailed steps in Figure
1. In the figure, the resources (input and output) are shown as rectangular shapes, while
the functional steps are presented as round rectangles (fully automated steps are shown
with darker color than the manual steps). At the end of this execution flow, we realize the
4

ontology on Protégé [15] which is an ontology editor and a knowledge-base framework. The
details of the aforementioned two phases are described in the rest of this section basically
following the functional steps in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Execution Flow of the Employed Ontology Building Approach.

5

2.1. Learning Ontology Concepts from the Web
Ontology learning is defined as the task of automatic or semi-automatic knowledge discovery from different data sources and representation of the ultimate ontology [16]. Within
the course of the current study, we consider Wikipedia [11] articles as our data source for
learning an ontology for the wind energy domain. Wikipedia is a large and valuable source
of semantic information. It has been commonly pointed out in the literature that it can
serve various tasks including information extraction, information retrieval, question answering systems, and ontology building [17, 18]. Therefore, we choose the Wikipedia article for
the term wind power [19] as our initial point and utilized this article and linked articles as
the information source to facilitate the ontology building process for wind energy domain.
The approach followed is very much like that of the Web search engines which traverse the
links in Web pages in a breadth-first manner, yet, we only consider the articles linked to
the initial article (links in the first level), i.e., we do not process the articles linked to the
linked articles of the initial article.
Table 1: Frequent N-grams in the Initial Wikipedia Article for Wind Power (with Frequencies in Parentheses).

Unigrams
wind (346)
power (149)
energy (135)
turbine (65)
capacity (54)
electricity (50)
grid (36)

Bigrams
wind power (82)
wind energy (51)
wind turbine (45)
wind farm (39)
renewable energy (22)
capacity factor (16)
offshore wind (15)

Trigrams
offshore wind power (8)
wind power capacity (4)
wind power industry (3)
meteorology and climatology (2)
wind turbine engineering (2)
electric power transmission (2)
wind generated power (2)

Our overall ontology learning procedure for wind energy domain from Wikipedia articles
is carried out as follows: first, the text of the initial Wikipedia article is obtained and
stopwords in the text are eliminated. After stopword elimination, named entities (such as
6

person, location, and organization names) as well as numeric expressions are also removed
from the text. Next, unigrams, bigrams, and trigrams are obtained with their frequencies
from the resulting text. Especially highly frequent phrases are then manually examined
to determine whether they are relevant to the target ontology or not. Relevant phrases
are utilized as concepts and concept properties of the ontology. The same procedure is
employed for the linked Wikipedia articles and again relevant phrases contribute to the
ontology. To better illustrate the process, the highly frequent sample phrases in the text
of the initial Wikipedia article are provided in Table 1 together with their frequencies in
parentheses as sorted by their frequencies.
2.2. Organizing the Ontology
Apart from the frequent phrases determined in the steps described in the previous
section, we have also examined several related textbooks of the domain [2, 1] and the set of
wind turbine standards by International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) [20] to arrive
at a wide-coverage (yet extensible) domain ontology for wind power domain. At this stage,
the relevant phrases extracted from the Web are complemented with those extracted from
the aforementioned written resources and the resulting information is organized to form
the ultimate ontology. The taxonomy of the concepts in the final form of the proposed
domain ontology is presented in Figure 2. The ontology is built utilizing Protégé [15, 21]
as the ontology editor and the hierarchy of the ontology classes is presented in Figure 3 as
snapshots.

7

Wind Power Plant
(Wind Farm)

is-a
has
generates
causes
utilizes
measures
controls

Blade

Gearbox

Hub

Rotor

Generator
H-axis
Turbine

Wind Turbine
(Wind Turbine
Generator)

Meteorological
Tower

Data
Logger
Humidity
Sensor

Sensor

Pressure
Sensor

8
Temperature

Wind
Profiler

Solar
Radiation
Sensor

Solar
Radiation

DAQ
System

Monitoring and
Control System

Forecast
System

Turbine
Status

Wind
Vane

Propeller
Anemometer

Measured
Power

Wind
Speed

LIDAR
Sensor

Meteorological
Data

Wind
Turbulence

Wind
Direction

RADAR
Sensor

Power
Quality

Wind Power
(Wind Energy)

Sonic
Anemometer
SODAR
Sensor

Analysis
System

Numerical
Weather
Prediction
Physical
Model

Statistical
Model
Cup
Anemometer

Temperature
Sensor

Control
System

Anemometer

Humidity

Pressure

V-axis
Turbine

Tower

Nacelle

Vertical Wind
Component

Horizontal Wind
Component

Wind
Shear

U-component
V-component

Figure 2: The Domain Ontology for Wind Energy.

Forecast
Power

Figure 3: The Class Hierarchy of the Wind Energy Ontology on Protégé [15].

At the center of the ontology is the Wind Power Plant class which has the major
components represented by the classes of Meteorological Tower, Wind Turbine, Monitoring and Control System, and Forecast System. The Meteorological Tower class in turn
comprises Data Logger and Sensor classes, where the latter class has several subclasses,
namely, Humidity Sensor, Pressure Sensor, Temperature Sensor, Solar Radiation Sensor,
Wind Profiler, Wind Vane, and Anemometer. Among these classes, the latter three of
them represent devices for measuring wind properties and are therefore more significant
9

for the overall wind energy ontology. To clarify the corresponding devices, a wind profiler is a device for measuring wind speed and direction, while wind vanes only measure
wind direction and anemometers only measure wind speed. Anemometers usually come in
three basic types represented in our ontology by the classes of Cup Anemometer, Propeller
Anemometer, and Sonic Anemometer. All of the Sensor subclasses in the proposed wind
energy ontology represent devices for measuring distinct types of data on meteorological
phenomena which are represented by the Meteorological Data class. The Wind class has
the components of Wind Speed, Wind Direction, Vertical Wind Component, Horizontal
Wind Component (which in turn has U-component and V-component as components),
Wind Shear and Turbulence. The names of the first four of these classes are fairly selfexplanatory. Considering the last two classes, wind shear is the change of wind speed as
a function of height while turbulence is defined to be the standard deviation of horizontal
wind speed, vertical wind speed, and wind direction as 10-min averages [1].
The second significant component of a wind farm is a set of wind turbines (i.e., wind
turbine generators) represented with the Wind Turbine class. The turbines usually fall into
one of the two types: horizontal axis turbines (modeled with H-axis Turbine) and vertical
axis turbines (modeled with V-axis Turbine class). Main components of a generic wind
turbine are rotor, nacelle, and tower which are modeled with the corresponding classes of
Rotor, Nacelle, and Tower, respectively. The rotor of a wind turbine is usually composed of
the blades (modeled by the Blade class) and the rotor hub (represented with the Hub class)
which connects the blades to the shaft [1]. Nacelle is the part of the turbine that includes
the main parts apart from those included in the rotor system such gearbox, generator, and
brake [1] where we only include the Gearbox and the Generator classes in our ontology as

10

parts of the Nacelle class. Depending on the requirements of the application in which the
wind energy ontology will be utilized, the parts of the Nacelle class can be extended and
more classes to represent these parts can be added to the ontology. The last part of a wind
turbine is the structural part represented with the Tower class. Wind turbines generate
wind power represented with the Wind Power class in our ontology.
The last two parts of a typical wind power plant are the monitoring and control system
(modeled with Monitoring and Control System class) and the forecast system (modeled
with Forecast System class). The former system has several components including a control system, a data acquisition (DAQ) system, and an analysis system denoted by the
classes of Control System, DAQ System, and Analysis System, respectively. This system is
used to monitor and measure turbine status information, as well as generated power and
electrical power quality, which are represented by Turbine Status, Measured Power, and
Power Quality classes, respectively. The power quality is actually another related domain
which is not modeled in our ontology in details but as will be emphasized in the following
section, an ontology for this domain can be integrated into the current ontology to cover
this power quality concept and related concepts adequately. The Forecast System class represents the system which utilizes numerical weather predictions together with previously
generated physical and statistical models of the wind power plants to produce forecasts
regarding the wind generated power. Hence, related classes with self-explanatory names
include Numerical Weather Prediction, Physical Model, Statistical Model, and finally Forecast Power. Although some forecast systems may also output forecasts for wind speed and
direction, we do not consider that case here as the ultimate aim of the system is usually
power forecast.

11

Wind Power Plant, which is the central class of our wind energy ontology, has the
synonymous names of Wind Farm, Wind Plant, and Wind Energy Plant. It is also commonly abbreviated as WPP. As other concepts of the domain also have several synonyms,
we have added a synonymSet property for applicable concepts to hold the synonyms of
the actual class names corresponding to these concepts. Abbreviations are also treated as
synonyms and this property is used to hold abbreviations as well. We provide synonyms
of some of the concepts of the ontology in Table 2 for illustrative purposes. As shown in
the table, WPP is added as a synonym of the Wind Power Plant class. Similarly, WTG
is the abbreviation for Wind Turbine Generator which in turn is a synonym of the Wind
Turbine class, hence WTG is also added to the synonym set of this class.
Table 2: Synonyms of Some of the Concepts in the Wind Energy Ontology.

Ontology Class
Wind Power Plant
Wind Power
Wind Turbine
Wind Vane

Synonyms
WPP, Wind Plant, Wind Energy Plant, Wind Farm
Wind Power Generation, Energy, Generation,
Wind Energy, Wind Generation, Wind Generated Power,
Electricity Production
Turbine, Wind Turbine Generator, WTG, Generator
Weather Vane, Weather Cock

As we have previously pointed out, properties and relations are also specified within the
ultimate wind energy ontology. While properties are mostly obtained from the extracted
keywords from Wikipedia articles (where the procedure is outlined in the previous subsection), relations are manually formed considering the interrelations between the semantic
concepts (corresponding to the classes in Figure 2). Plausible properties of some of the
classes are provided in Table 3 for illustrative purposes. It should be noted that properties
may also have some synonymous names. For instance, installed capacity property of Wind
Power Plant class has rated capacity, nominal capacity, maximum effect, power capacity,
12

nameplate capacity, and wind power capacity as its synonyms. Similarly, utilisation rate is
a synonym for the capacity factor property of the same class2 . Therefore such information
is also modeled in the ontology through the synonymSet property of the applicable concept
properties. Among the properties of Wind Power Plant class in Table 3, voltage level corresponds to that level through which the plant is integrated to the electrical grid and the
names of the remaining ones are fairly self-explanatory. The properties of Wind Turbine
mostly model the technical characteristics of the turbines while the properties of the Wind
Speed class aim to cover the actual speed, the height at which the speed is measured or
forecasted, the date of measurement or forecast, and the plant where the speed is measured
or forecasted.
Table 3: Properties of Some of the Concepts of the Wind Energy Ontology.

Ontology Class
Wind Power Plant

Wind Turbine
Wind Speed

Properties
name, owner, location, license date,
number of turbines, installed capacity, capacity factor,
voltage level
model, hub height, swept area, rated power,
power curve, cut-in wind speed, cut-out wind speed,
rotor diameter, number of blades
speed, height, date, wind power plant

Considering the relations among the concepts in the ontology, there are basically seven
distinct relation types which are outlined below:
• is-a: This type denotes the subclass-class relation between the corresponding concepts in the ontology. For instance, is-a relation exists between the Anemometer and
Sensor classes to specify that an anemometer is a kind of sensor.
2

Installed capacity of a power plant is defined as the “intended technical fullload sustained output” [19]
of the corresponding plant while capacity factor is usually defined as the ratio of generated power to the
installed capacity.

13

• has: This relation corresponds to the part-of information between concepts. It exists
between the Wind Power Plant and Wind Turbine classes as wind power plants have
a number of turbines.
• generates: This relation type and the remaining types denote functional relations
with quite self-explanatory names. Hence, we only provide examples from the ontology in Figure 2 to illustrate the relations, hence, this generates relation can be
observed between Wind Turbine and Wind Power classes of the ontology.
• causes: This type of relation is illustrated between Wind and Wind Power classes
as depicted in Figure 2.
• utilizes: This relation exists between the classes of Wind Turbine and Wind as wind
turbines utilize wind to generate wind power.
• measures: This relation type can be observed between the Anemometer and Wind
Speed classes in the ontology.
• controls: This relation exists between Control System and Wind Power Plant classes
in the wind energy ontology.
It should be noted that we do not claim to cover all meteorological phenomena and
other wind related concepts in our ontology and as it will be clarified in the upcoming
section, relevant ontologies on the topic can be integrated into the wind power ontology to
increase its coverage.
The final form of the proposed ontology is made available for research purposes at
http://www.ceng.metu.edu.tr/~e120329/wont.owl as a Web Ontology Language (OWL)
file.
14

3. Prospective Integration with Related Ontologies and Application Areas
The proposed wind energy ontology has some concepts, particularly Power Quality
and Meteorological Data, corresponding to distinct but related domains which may be
represented in a more detailed manner. But, instead of extending the proposed wind
energy ontology with the concepts for these domains from scratch, ontologies for these two
domains can be integrated into the wind energy ontology. For the domain of meteorological
data, the ontology covered in [22], which is an ontology for atmospheric science, can be
integrated into the wind energy ontology. For the domain of electrical power quality,
PQONT domain ontology [9] has been proposed and it can readily be integrated into the
wind power ontology as it is publicly available as an OWL file. Another plausible option is
to extend the proposed ontology to make it a larger renewable energy ontology, considering
the semantics of other renewable energy types like solar and biomass. With this prospective
extension and aforementioned integration opportunities with the related domain ontologies,
the wind energy ontology can be turned into a wider coverage ontology and hence can serve
a wider range of applications.
There are several significant application areas of domain ontologies. Basically, they
are known to be of particular importance for semantic information extraction, information
retrieval, and question answering systems, among others. Below, we outline the plausible application areas in which the wind energy ontology that we have proposed can be
employed:
• The ontology could act as a shared vocabulary of concepts to ensure the interoperability of the various wind energy applications like monitoring and forecast systems.
The proposed ontology could also aid in reducing the software analysis and design
15

costs during the development of the aforementioned systems as it acts as a viable
source of semantic information for the underlying domain of wind energy.
• The ontology can be integrated into a domain-specific information extraction system
to automatically extract significant pieces of information on wind energy and related
topics from free natural language texts. Utilizing such an information extraction
system, the proposed ontology could be populated with relevant instances. Similar
to the previous point, the ontology could be employed as part of an information retrieval system to determine the index terms to be used during retrieval or as part of
a question answering system to determine relevant answers from relevant documents
for the specified questions. A text categorization system can also benefit from the
proposed ontology to detect documents related to wind energy (or, renewable energy)
in a large set of text documents. The ontology could also be employed in a natural
language interface over the populated ontology where queries in natural language can
be transformed into valid ontology queries making use of the concept names, properties, and their synonyms to pinpoint the queried information. This final application
is exemplified in [9] where a natural language interface, based on the PQONT domain
ontology for electrical power quality, is described where the interface basically utilizes the ontology to determine the concepts specified in the natural language query
expressions..

4. Conclusion
There is a growing interest in wind energy which is a significant type of renewable
energy with a growing share in the electricity production all over the world. Accord-

16

ingly, research on topics related to wind energy, including monitoring and forecast of wind
power, has gained considerable attention. In this study, we deal with the wind energy domain from a knowledge-based perspective and propose the first considerably wide-coverage
domain ontology for wind energy. The ontology building process is a learning-based semiautomated procedure where in the first phase plausible keywords to be utilized during the
determination of the concepts and their properties are learned from the Web. Namely, related Wikipedia articles are processed to determine the relevant keywords and next related
textbooks and international standards are examined to organize these keywords to arrive
at the ultimate ontology. Hence, we decrease the ontology building costs considerably by
employing a learning procedure and utilizing Web as a source of semantic information.
It should be noted that the proposed ontology can be extended or customized to better
satisfy the needs of prospective applications in which the ontology will be employed. The
final form of the proposed ontology is also made publicly available for research purposes.
Plausible directions of future research include the integration of the ontology with
related engineering ontologies such as those for atmospheric science and electrical power
quality. It can also be extended into a more comprehensive renewable energy ontology.
Moreover, the ontology can be employed in knowledge-based systems such as information
extractors, information retrieval, question answering, and text categorization systems in
addition to natural language interfaces, to assess its practical contribution to such systems.

References
[1] P. Jain, Wind Energy Engineering, 1st Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2011.

17

[2] T. Burton, D. Sharpe, N. Jenkins, E. Bossanyi, Wind Energy Handbook, 1st Edition,
John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
[3] Renewable energy - Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy.
[4] Wind

Power

Monitoring

and

Forecast

System

(RİTM),

http://www.ritm.gov.tr/en/root/index.php.
[5] A. Gómez-Pérez, M. Fernández-López, O. Corcho, Ontological Engineering, 3rd Edition, Springer-Verlag, 2004.
[6] R. Stevens, C. Goble, I. Horrocks, S. Bechhofer, Building a bioinformatics ontology
using OIL, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 6 (2) (2002)
135–141.
[7] D. Gasević, V. Devedzić, Petri net ontology, Knowledge-Based Systems 19 (4) (2006)
220–234.
[8] J. Morbach, A. Yang, W. Marquardt, Ontocape-a large-scale ontology for chemical
process engineering, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 20 (2) (2007)
147–161.
[9] D. Küçük, O. Salor, T. İnan, I. Çadırcı, M. Ermiş, PQONT: A domain ontology for
electrical power quality, Advanced Engineering Informatics 24 (2010) 84–95.
[10] C. Zhang, C. Cao, Y. Sui, X. Wu, A chinese time ontology for the Semantic Web,
Knowledge-Based Systems 24 (7) (2011) 1057–1074.
[11] Wiki - Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki.

18

[12] Y. Zhu, X. Wang, D. Cheng, Ontology-based research on wind power plant information interaction, in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Knowledge Discovery and Data
Mining, 2008.
[13] P. Papadopoulos, L. Cipcigan, Wind turbines’ condition monitoring: an ontology
model, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Power Generation and Supply, 2009.
[14] M. Pipattanasomporn, H. Feroze, S. Rahman, Securing critical loads in a pv-based
microgrid with a multi-agent system, Renewable Energy 39 (1) (2012) 166–174.
[15] The

Protégé

Ontology

Editor

and

Knowledge

Acquisition

System,

http://protege.stanford.edu.
[16] L. Drumond, R. Girardi, A survey of ontology learning procedures, in: Proceedings of
the 3rd Workshop on Ontologies and Their Applications, 2008.
[17] O. Medelyan, D. Milne, C. Legg, I. H. Witten, Mining meaning from Wikipedia,
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67 (9) (2009) 716–754.
[18] S. Ferrández, A. Toral, O. Ferrández, A. Ferrández, R. Munoz, Exploiting Wikipedia
and EuroWordNet to solve cross-lingual question answering, Information Sciences
179 (20) (2009) 3473–3488.
[19] Wind power - Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power.
[20] IEC 61400 - Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEC_61400.
[21] N. F. Noy, M. Sintek, S. Decler, M. Crubezy, R. W. Fergerson, M. A. Musen, Creating

19

Semantic Web contents with Protege-2000, IEEE Intelligent Systems 16 (2) (2001)
60–71.
[22] R. Ramachandran, S. Movva, S. Graves, S. Tanner, Ontology-based semantic search
tool for atmospheric science, in: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference
on Interactive Information Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and
Hydrology, 2006.

20

