A Real-Time Millimeter-Wave Phased Array MIMO
Channel Sounder
C. U. Bas1 , Student Member, IEEE, R. Wang1 , Student Member, IEEE, D. Psychoudakis2 , Senior Member, IEEE,
T. Henige2 , R. Monroe2 , J. Park3 , Member, IEEE, J. Zhang2 , Fellow, IEEE, A. F. Molisch1 , Fellow, IEEE

arXiv:1703.05271v4 [] 22 Jun 2017

1 University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA,
2 Samsung Research America, Richardson, TX, USA
3 Samsung Electronics, Suwon, Korea

Abstract—In this paper, we present a novel real-time MIMO
channel sounder for 28 GHz. Until now, the common practice
to investigate the directional characteristics of millimeter-wave
channels has been using a rotating horn antenna. The sounder
presented here is capable of performing horizontal and vertical
beam steering with the help of phased arrays. Thanks to the
fast beam-switching capability, the proposed sounder can perform measurements that are directionally resolved both at the
transmitter (TX) and receiver (RX) as fast as 1.44 milliseconds
compared to the minutes or even hours required for rotating horn
antenna sounders. This does not only enable us to measure more
points for better statistical inference but also allows us to perform
directional analysis in dynamic environments. Equally important,
the short measurement time combined with the high phase stability
of our setup limits the phase drift between TX and RX, enabling
phase-coherent sounding of all beam pairs even when TX and
RX are physically separated and have no cabled connection
for synchronization. This ensures that the measurement data
is suitable for high-resolution parameter extraction algorithms.
Along with the system design and specifications, this paper also
discusses the measurements performed for verification of the
sounder. Furthermore, we present sample measurements from a
channel sounding campaign performed on a residential street.

I. I NTRODUCTION
The ever-growing need for higher data rates in wireless
communications is motivating the use of previously unused
spectrum. Consequently, the millimeter wave (mm-wave) band
has become a key area of interest for next generation wireless
communication systems due to the ample amount of bandwidth
available at the frequencies higher than 6 GHz. It is now clear
that mm-wave systems will be an essential component of 5th
generation cellular networks [1].
The knowledge of true statistical characteristics of the propagation channel is imperative for designing and testing wireless
systems [2] [3]. An accurate channel model is even more
important for mm-wave bands, due to its unique propagation
characteristics. It is anticipated that most of the future mm-wave
systems will utilize beam-forming antenna arrays to overcome
the higher path loss that occurs at higher frequencies. Hence
the angular spectrum and its temporal evolution are vital for
the efficient design of such systems [4].
In this paper, we present a real-time double-directional channel sounder setup that is suitable for super-resolution parameter
estimation. The setup presented in this paper operates at 28
GHz, although its design principles can be applied to other mmwave bands. Unlike the commonly used virtual array, rotating
horn antenna or switched antenna setups, this sounder is based
on an approach of electrically-switched beams. By using arrays

of antennas with phase shifters, we form beams into different
directions at both the transmitter (TX) and the receiver (RX).
Thanks to the control interface implemented in FPGA, we are
capable of switching from one beam to another in less than
2 µs. Most of the existing directional channel sounders for
indoor mm-wave systems are based on vector network analyzers
(VNAs), which cannot operate in real-time, and need cabled
connections between TX and RX; they are thus mostly used
for static indoor channel measurements. For outdoor measurements, the prevalent method is based on mechanically rotating
horn antennas [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. Note, however, that mechanical
rotation requires measurement durations on the order of 0.5-5
hours for one measurement location.
Since our proposed setup decreases the measurement time
for a single MIMO snapshot from hours to milliseconds, it
allows collection of tens of thousands of measurement points in
a single measurement campaign, i.e., many orders of magnitude
faster than with rotating horns. Furthermore, since all TX and
RX antenna pairs can be measured within the coherence time of
the channel, the developed sounder is suitable for measurement
campaigns in dynamic environments. Furthermore, with proper
repetition of MIMO snapshots, the temporal evolution of multipath components (MPC) can be tracked.
Most importantly, short measurement time together with
careful RF design to reduce phase noise limits the relative
accumulated phase drift between the sample clocks of the
TX and RX within a single MIMO snapshot even without a
cabled connection for synchronizing the clocks. Thanks to this
phase coherence, the measurement data are suitable for high
resolution parameter extractions algorithms such as RIMAX
[10] or SAGE [11] [12]. These algorithms allow us to reveal
the true double-directional channel model which only depends
on the channel of interest and exclude all the effects from the
hardware used in the measurements [13].
Parallel to our work, three other groups have developed realtime capable mm-wave sounders: [14] recently presented a
sounder based on an array of horn antennas combined with
an electronic switch at the RX and a single TX antenna.
This design is capable of faster sounding, and is similar in
spirit to our approach; however, it can only provide angular
information for RX side (though to the best of our knowledge
it is being upgraded to a MIMO setup). There are two important
differences to our setup: (i) it has significantly less equivalent
isotropically radiated power (EIRP) even with the horn antennas
(ii) the use of mechanically arranged horns limits the flexibility

NI DAQ
Timing (5)

NI RT
Controller (6)

FPGA
Interface (7)

Variable
PAs Antennas
Attenuators

Up-conversion
X

VGA

IF
AWG (1)

Mixer (2)

BPF (3)

PA (4)

X

X

Frequency
Synthesizer (8)
10 MHz Ref
&
TTL Trigger

IF
Divider

IF
1.8 GHz

Beamformer
RFU TX
(10)

1.6 GHz

Gain Control
Signal

10 MHz
10 MHz

Frequency
Reference (9)

Transmitter

FPGA
Interface

Beam Control
Signal

x2

x2

x2

Frequency Doublers

φ

φ

φ

Phase shifters

16-way LO Divider

Fig. 1. TX Block Diagram
FPGA
Interface (7)

NI RT
Controller (6)

IF
Beamformer
RFU Rx (11)

BPF (3)

Mixer (2)

LO at 13 GHz

NI DAQ
Timing (5)

LPF (12)

ADC (13)

-20

1.6 GHz

10 MHz

-30

HD (14)

10 MHz
Frequency
Reference (9)

10 MHz Ref
&
TTL Trigger

Fig. 2. RX Block Diagram

Power Spectrum (dBm)

Frequency
Synthesizer (8)

Receiver

Fig. 3. TX RFU Block Diagram

-40
-50
-60
-70
-80

TABLE I
L IST OF PART NUMBERS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)

Agilent N8241
Mini-Circuits ZEM-M2TMH+
KL Microwave 11ED50-1900/T500-O/O
Pre-Amplifier
National Instruments PXIe-6361
National Instruments PXIe-8135
National Instruments PXIe-7961R
Phase Matrix FSW-0020
Precision Test Systems GPS10eR
Samsung 28 GHz RFU TX
Samsung 28 GHz RFU RX
Low Pass filter
National Instruments PXIe-5160
National Instruments HDD-8265

compared to our sounder, which can reconfigure the beampatterns through software. The sounder described in [15] is
a multi-band and multi-antenna channel sounder operating at
30 GHz, 60 GHz and 90 GHz with 8 by 8, 2 by 2 and 2
by 2 antenna arrays, respectively. However, due to the power
limitations of the switch, the nominal TX power at 30 GHz is
only 16 dBm and the MIMO order is lower than the 16x16
achieved in our setup. Finally, [16] presents a sounder with
4 TX antennas multiplexed with a switch and 4 RX antennas
with 4 down-conversion chains. Similar to [15], the TX power
is limited to 24 dBm.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section II
discusses the proposed channel sounder setup. Section III explains the measurements which investigate system performance.
Section IV presents sample results from measurements. Finally
Section V summarizes results and suggests directions for future
work.
II. C HANNEL S OUNDER D ESIGN
The developed channel sounder is a beam-switched multicarrier setup with 400 MHz instantaneous bandwidth. Figure
1 shows the block diagram for the TX. A 15-bit, 1.25-GSps

-90
1400

1500

1600

1700

1800

1900

2000

2100

2200

2300

Frequency (MHz)

Fig. 4. Spectrum of the sounding signal at IF

arbitrary waveform generator (AWG) generates the baseband
sounding signal which consists of equally spaced 801 tones
covering the frequency range from 50 MHz to 450 MHz. As
suggested in [17], by manipulating the phases of individual
tones, we achieved a low peak to average power ratio (PAPR)
of 0.4 dB which allows us to transmit with power as close as
possible to the 1 dB compression point of the power amplifiers
without driving them into saturation. Since it is desirable to
stay in the power amplifiers’ linear regime of operation while
maximizing the transmitted power, the output power is set
3.4 dB (PAPR plus 3 dB) less than the 1dB compression
point of the amplifiers. Note that while Zadoff-Chu sequences,
which are, e.g., used in LTE, provide PAPR=1 under idealized
circumstances, this does not hold true for filtered, oversampled
sequences, which are relevant here. Our sequences outperform
Zadoff-Chu by more than 1 dB.
After the baseband signal is generated, a mixer up-converts
it with a local oscillator (LO) frequency of 1.6 GHz. Since we
only utilize the upper sideband of the up-converted signal as the
IF input of the beam-former radio frequency unit (BF-RFU), a
band-pass filter suppresses the LO leakage of the mixer and the
lower sideband. After the band-pass filter and the preamplifier,
we obtain an IF signal with 400 MHz bandwidth centered at
1.85 GHz as seen in Figure 4. The peak seen at the frequency of
1.6 GHz is due to residual LO leakage. It is at least 10 dB lower
than the sounding tones and approximately 40 dB lower than
the total power of the multi-tone signal, hence it does not affect
the measurements. Finally the IF signal fed to the BF-RFU,
whose simplified block diagram is shown in Figure 3. Similar to
the [18], within the BF-RFU, this IF signal is divided into 16 RF

TABLE II
S OUNDER SPECIFICATIONS
Hardware Specifications
Center Frequency
27.85 GHz
Instantaneous Bandwidth
400 MHz (max 1 GHz)
Antenna array size
8 by 2 (for both TX and RX)
-45 to 45 degree
Horizontal beam steering
Horizontal 3dB beam width
12 degrees
Vertical beam steering
-30 to 30 degree
Vertical 3dB beam width
22 degrees
Horizontal/Vertical steering steps
5 degrees
Beam switching speed
2µs
TX EIRP
57 dBm
RX noise figure
≤ 5 dB
ADC/AWG resolution
10/15-bit
Data streaming speed
700MBps
Sounding Waveform Specifications

Fig. 5. RX setup

chains. Each chain is up-converted to 27.85 GHz with dedicated
amplifiers and phase shifters to perform beam-forming. The BFRFU allows us to perform 90 degree horizontal beam steering
and 60 degree vertical beam steering with 5-degree resolution.
Another key feature of the RFUs is their low phase noise, see
Section III-C. Note that the 1 dB compression point of the
individual amplifier is 31 dBm per amplifier, however, thanks
to 16 power amplifiers used in parallel, the total output power
is 40 dBm with 3 dB back off. After 3 dB feed loss and taking
into account the 20 dBi antenna gain (array gain plus element
gain), we achieve 57 dBm EIRP at the output of the TX array.
Combined with RX gain, for 400 MHz bandwidth, we achieve
a measurable path-loss of 159 dB without any averaging. For
larger path-loss, we can use a smaller bandwidth or employ
averaging at the RX.
Similar to the TX RFU, the RX RFUs also consist of 16element beam-forming antenna arrays. Once all received power
is combined, there is an additional step of automatic gain
control to utilize the dynamic range of the RX to its limits.
In the current design, we have one RX BF-RFU providing 90degree coverage. In the future, we aim to have 4 BF-RFUs
for the RX to achieve complete 360 degree coverage. In the
meantime, we physically rotate the RX to 4 orientations to
cover 360-degree in azimuth. At the output of the RX BFRFU, the received IF signal is filtered, down-converted back to
baseband and finally sampled by a 1.25 GSps 10-bit digitizer.
The digitizer streams the sampled data to a raid array with a
rate up to 700 MBps and stores the data for post processing as
shown in Figure 2.
Both the TX and the RX are controlled with LabVIEW
scripts running on National Instruments PXIe controllers. The
beam steering and gain of the variable gain amplifiers at the
BF-RFUs are controlled via an FPGA interface with a custom
designed control signaling protocol implemented in LabVIEW
FPGA. This interface allows us to switch between any beam
setting or gain setting in less than 2µs. Consequently, the
proposed sounder can complete a full-sweep a million times
faster than a virtual array. More importantly, all beam pairs can
be measured without retriggering the digitizer or the AWG. This
avoids triggering jitter which would create uncertainty in the
absolute delay of the paths observed in different beams. TX and
RX have no physical connections and they are synchronized
with GPS-disciplined Rubidium frequency references. These
references provide two signals for the timing of the setup; a 10

2 µs
10
801
500 kHz
0.4 dB
14.44 ms (min 1.44ms)

Waveform duration
Repetition per beam pair
Number of tones
Tone spacing
PAPR
Total sweep time1

-15°

0°

15°

-30°

-45°
30°

-45°

-40°
-35°

45°

-30°
-60°

-25°

60°

-20°
-75°

75°

-15°
-10°
-5°

90°

-90°

0°
5°

-105°

105°

-20

10°
15°
20°

-10

-120°

120°

25°
30°

-135°

135°

0
-150°

150°
-165°

10 165°

35°
40°
45°

±180°

Fig. 6. Beam patterns in Azimuth

MHz clock to be used as a timebase for all units and 1 pulse
per second (PPS) signal aligned to Universal Time Coordinated
(UTC).
Given the measurement period, hardware counters in the
NI DAQ Timing modules count the rising edges of the 10
MHz and trigger the rest of the units at given times. These
counters are in turn triggered by the 1 PPS. Since the 1
PPS signals in the TX and RX are both aligned to the UTC,
they operate synchronously without requiring any physical
connections. More importantly, the AWG, the ADC, the frequency synthesizers and the BF-RFUs are disciplined with
the 10 MHz signal provided by these frequency references,
so that they maintain phase stability during the measurements,
which is essential for accurate measurement results [12]. These
references also provide GPS locations which are logged along
with the measurement data.
Finally, Table II summarizes the hardware and sounding
waveform specifications. While this is the configuration used
throughout this paper, the sounding waveform can be modified
without any significant changes in the hardware. Equally importantly, the beams can be configured by modifications of the
FPGAs in the RFUs. This enables, for example, to get fast scanning in azimuth only for situations where we know that MPCs
are mainly incident in the horizontal plane, while a slower
sweep through azimuth and elevation can be implemented for
1 For

1 elevation and all 19x19 RX-TX azimuth beam combinations.

Fig. 7. Received power vs TX and RX beam pairs when LOS component is at RX angle x and TX angle y and (x, y) = {(20, 15), (−5, 15), (−30, 15)}

shift of a multi-path component received by different antennas
or beams as in our case.

-30
-35
-20
0
10
30

-40

Power spectrum (dBm)

-50
-60
-70
-80
-90
-100
-110
-120
-130

0

100

200

300

400

500

Frequency(MHz)

Fig. 8. Received Power Spectrum with different RX beams

other cases. This is a significant advantage compared to setups
of horn arrays, which cannot be reconfigured without extensive
mechanical modifications.
III. S YSTEM V ERIFICATION
A. Beam Steering
First of all, we investigate the patterns of the beams formed
by the RX BF-RFU, the results are representative for the TX
side as well. Figure 6 shows the beam patterns for all azimuth
beams for the RX. In azimuth, 19 beams cover the range 45 to +45 degrees with 5-degree steps. All beams have 12degree 3 dB beam-width and the side lobes are -10 dB or less
relative to the main beam. Consequently, in our preliminary
results, we investigate the directional channel characteristics
by utilizing the beam directionality. However, with the proper
calibration of the antenna arrays, in the future, we are planning
to apply high resolution parameter extraction (HRPE) methods
such as RIMAX to investigate directional characteristics of the
propagation channel. In that case, the actual beam patterns
do not affect the extracted parameters, as one can completely
decouple the system response and the propagation channel [10]
[13].
Figure 7 shows the received power for all horizontal TXRX beam pairs for where the LOS component is at x degree
(relative to the 0 degree point of the physical array of the TX,
and y degree relative to the RX array). Since the beams are
overlapping, significant power is recorded at several beam positions. While this effect naturally limits the angular resolution
when directions are determined based on the ”strongest beam”
only (similar to horn antennas), the effect is actually desired for
HRPE algorithms which usually depend on the relative phase

B. Frequency Response
Since the sounding signal has 400 MHz bandwidth, the
frequency response of the channel sounder is also relevant.
Figure 8 shows the combined channel response of the TX and
RX. To compare the response of the different beams, we rotated
the RX to align different RX beams towards to the TX. As seen
in Figure 8, the frequency responses of different RX beams are
within ±1dB over the whole frequency band. Furthermore, the
ratio of the complex frequency responses of two beams for all
frequency tones can be estimated with a complex scalar which
has approximately unit gain. This fact greatly facilitates the
HRPE, see [10].
C. Phase Stability
The most important features of the proposed sounder are its
short measurement time and phase stability. These two features
are required for measurements in dynamic environments and
high resolution parameter extraction [12]. To investigate the
phase stability of the system, we run the sounder continuously
for 50ms with fixed beams at the TX and the RX. Figure 9
shows the phase drift of the center tone for the i) best-case
scenario: TX and RX use a shared reference, and ii) worst-case
scenario: they operate with independent free-running Rubidium
frequency references. During the measurement campaigns, the
true phase stability will be in between these two cases thanks
to the GPS stabilization of the frequency references. However,
even with the free-running references, the total accumulated
phase drift observed during a full-sweep of TX and RX beams
is only 4 degrees over 1.444 ms. In this work, we employed
10 repetitions for each beam pair to improve the SNR by
averaging resulting a sweep time of 14.44 ms. In this case,
the accumulated drift is 40-degree in the worst case. However,
as long as the total drift is guaranteed to be lower than
360 degrees, it can be estimated easily by simply adopting a
switching pattern with repeated beam pairs, the estimation is
further simplified by the fact that the phase drift is essentially
linear even over the fairly long time of 50 ms [19].
Since HRPE algorithms depend on the phase relation between different beam settings, the repeatability of the phase
is as important as its stability. To ensure that the calibration
measurements are valid, it is crucial that the relative phase
between 2 different beams stays constant at all times, even after
a complete restart of the sounder. To test this, we recorded the
received waveform, while switching back and forth between

0.04

-20

0.03

-40

0.02

-60
-80
-100

0
-0.01
-0.02

-140

-0.03
Shared Reference
Free-running References

180

0.01

-120

-160

200
Beam #9

Phase drift (degree)

0.05

0

Amplitude (V)

Phase drift (degree)

20

160
Beam 9
Beam 10

140

120

100

-0.04
Beam #10

-180

0

10

20

30

40

50

-0.05

0

5

10

15

80

20

0

10

20

Time (7s)

Time (ms)

30

40

50

Time (ms)

Fig. 9. Phase drift with shared and free-running Fig. 10. Received waveform when switching
between 2 beams
references

Fig. 11. Phase drift for beam 9 and beam 10

two beam settings as seen in Figure 10. Figure 11 shows
the phase of the center tone for the two beams. The phase
offset between two beams does not change significantly over
50 ms. Furthermore, this phase offset does not change even
after a complete power cycle of the sounder. Both in the
frequency synthesizers and in the BF-RFUs, we have phase
locked loops (PLLs) to derive the carrier frequencies from
10 MHz references. Every time they lock, they do so with
a random phase, however, the effect of the random phase is
the same for all beam pairs and has no effect on the relative
phase offset between different beam pairs, which is the relevant
quantity for HRPE.
Fig. 12. Received power vs TX and RX beams

IV. S AMPLE M EASUREMENTS
The directional power delay profile (PDP) for the TX beam
and RX beam with the azimuth angles θT X and θRX is
estimated as;

-135
-140

2

-145

(1)

where θT X/RX ∈ [−45, 45], F −1 denotes inverse Fourier
transform, Hi,j (f~) and Hcal (f~) are the frequency responses
for i-th TX and j-th RX beam and the calibration response
respectively; f~ are the used frequency tones, and ./ is elementwise division.
Since our current setup measures 90-degree sectors, we
simply repeat the measurements when the RX is rotated to
(0, 90, 180, 270) degrees to obtain 360-degree coverage at the
RX side. Then the angular power spectrum can be simply
calculated as:
X
P AS(θT X , θRX + φ) =
Pφ (θT X , θRX , τ )
(2)
τ

where Pφ (·) is the directional PDP in the RX orientation
φ ∈ (0, 90, 280, 270). Figure 12 shows the power angular
spectrum for a sample non-line-of-sight (NLOS) measurement
in a residential environment with a distance of 150 m.
For the 90-degree sectors in the TX and the RX, since all
beam pairs are measured without a significant phase drift or
trigger jitter, all directional PDPs are already aligned in the
delay domain and require no further correction. Consequently,
the corresponding PDP can be obtained similarly to the virtual
horn measurements with a shared reference even though the
sounder does not have a shared reference. There are different
methods discussed in [7] [20] for synthesizing omni-directional

PDP(dB)

n
 
 o
P (θT X , θRX , τ ) = F −1 HθT X ,θRX f~ ./Hcal f~

-130

-150
-155
-160
-165
-170
-175

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

Delay(ns)

Fig. 13. Power delay profile

PDP from directional measurements. Ultimately, the PDP obtained from HRPE will provide the best representation of the
channel. However, we use the approach from [7] to present
sample results here. Hence, the PDP for the 90-sector with the
RX orientation φ is given by:
P DPφ (τ ) = max max Pφ (θT X , θRX , τ )
θT X θRX

(3)

Figure 13 shows the P0 (τ ) for the same NLOS measurement
location. Furthermore, Figure 14 shows the power angular-delay
profiles for RX and TX which are calculated as follows.
P ADPφ,RX (θRX , τ ) = max Pφ (θT X , θRX , τ )
θT X

P ADPφ,T X (θT X , τ ) = max Pφ (θT X , θRX , τ )

(4)

θRX

Since we have to retrigger for every orientation (90 degree
steps) of the RX, the P DPφ (τ )’s obtained for different φ’s

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Part of this work was supported by grants from the National
Science Foundation.
R EFERENCES

Fig. 14. Power angular-delay profile
106
104

LOS
Free space path loss

102

Path loss (dB)

100
98
96
94
92
90
88
86
20

40

60

80

100 120 140

Distance (m)

Fig. 15. Line-of-sight (LOS) path-loss

might have a phase offset. Consequently, synthesizing omnidirectional PDP requires more post-processing, which will
be investigated in future. However, once the RX setup is
upgraded for 360 coverage, there won’t be any phase offset
between different sectors and the omnidirectional PDP can be
synthesized similar to the Equation 3. Finally, we can obtain
360-degree path-loss by adding up the power received from all
RX orientations:
XX
PL =
P DPφ (τ )
(5)
φ

τ

Figure 15 shows the calculated path-loss for line-of-sight
measurements according to Equation 5. The path-loss values
are in good agreement with the theoretical free-space path-loss
curve also shown in the figure.
V. C ONCLUSION
In this paper, we presented a novel mm-wave channel
sounder which can operate in dynamic environments. By
using a beam-forming array, we managed to decrease the
measurement time from minutes to milliseconds compared to
rotating horn antenna approach. Furthermore, thanks to the
beam-forming gain, the measurable path-loss we achieved for
a 400 MHz bandwidth is 159 dB without employing waveform
averaging. We also validated the sounders phase stability which
is the paramount feature of the proposed design. In the future,
we will upgrade our RX to cover 360 degrees in azimuth,
perform extensive channel sounding campaigns and process
the acquired data with high resolution parameter extraction
algorithms.

[1] S. Rangan, T. S. Rappaport, and E. Erkip, “Millimeter-wave cellular
wireless networks: Potentials and challenges,” Proceedings of the IEEE,
vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 366–385, March 2014.
[2] A. F. Molisch, Wireless communications, 2nd ed. IEEE Press - Wiley,
2010.
[3] A. F. Molisch, A. Karttunen, R. Wang, C. U. Bas, S. Hur, J. Park, and
J. Zhang, “Millimeter-wave channels in urban environments,” in 2016
10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), April
2016, pp. 1–5.
[4] W. Roh, J. Y. Seol, J. Park, B. Lee, J. Lee, Y. Kim, J. Cho, K. Cheun, and
F. Aryanfar, “Millimeter-wave beamforming as an enabling technology for
5G cellular communications: theoretical feasibility and prototype results,”
IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 106–113, February
2014.
[5] T. S. Rappaport, F. Gutierrez, E. Ben-Dor, J. N. Murdock, Y. Qiao,
and J. I. Tamir, “Broadband millimeter-wave propagation measurements
and models using adaptive-beam antennas for outdoor urban cellular
communications,” Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on,
vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1850–1859, April 2013.
[6] T. S. Rappaport, G. R. Maccartney, M. K. Samimi, and S. Sun, “Wideband millimeter-wave propagation measurements and channel models for
future wireless communication system design,” Communications, IEEE
Transactions on, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 3029–3056, Sept 2015.
[7] S. Hur, Y. J. Cho, J. Lee, N.-G. Kang, J. Park, and H. Benn, “Synchronous
channel sounder using horn antenna and indoor measurements on 28
GHz,” in 2014 IEEE International Black Sea Conference on Communications and Networking (BlackSeaCom), May 2014, pp. 83–87.
[8] M.-D. Kim, J. Liang, Y. K. Yoon, and J. H. Kim, “28 GHz path loss
measurements in urban environments using wideband channel sounder,”
in Antennas and Propagation USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on, July 2015, pp. 1798–1799.
[9] G. R. MacCartney and T. S. Rappaport, “A flexible millimeter-wave
channel sounder with absolute timing,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas
in Communications, vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–1, 2017.
[10] A. Richter, “Estimation of radio channel parameters: Models and algorithms.” ISLE, 2005.
[11] B. H. Fleury, M. Tschudin, R. Heddergott, D. Dahlhaus, and K. I. Pedersen, “Channel parameter estimation in mobile radio environments using
the SAGE algorithm,” IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications,
vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 434–450, Mar 1999.
[12] P. Almers, S. Wyne, F. Tufvesson, and A. F. Molisch, “Effect of random
walk phase noise on MIMO measurements,” in Vehicular Technology
Conference, 2005. VTC 2005-Spring. 2005 IEEE 61st, vol. 1. IEEE,
May 2005, pp. 141–145.
[13] M. Steinbauer, A. F. Molisch, and E. Bonek, “The double-directional radio
channel,” Antennas and Propagation Magazine, IEEE, vol. 43, no. 4, pp.
51–63, Aug 2001.
[14] P. B. Papazian, C. Gentile, K. A. Remley, J. Senic, and N. Golmie, “A
radio channel sounder for mobile millimeter-wave communications: System implementation and measurement assessment,” IEEE Transactions
on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 2924–2932,
Sept 2016.
[15] S. Salous, “Multi-band multi-antenna chirp channel sounder for frequencies above 6 GHz,” in 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and
Propagation (EuCAP), April 2016, pp. 1–4.
[16] Z. Wen, H. Kong, Q. Wang, S. Li, X. Zhao, M. Wang, and S. Sun,
“mmWave channel sounder based on COTS instruments for 5G and
indoor channel measurement,” in 2016 IEEE Wireless Communications
and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW), April 2016, pp. 37–
43.
[17] M. Friese, “Multitone signals with low crest factor,” Communications,
IEEE Transactions on, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1338–1344, Oct 1997.
[18] D. Psychoudakis, H. Zhou, B. Biglarbegian, T. Henige, and F. Aryanfar,
“Mobile station radio frequency unit for 5G communications at 28 GHz,”
in 2016 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium (IMS), May
2016, pp. 1–3.
[19] V. Kristem, O. Sangodoyin, C. Bas, M. Kaske, J. Lee, C. Schneider,
G. Sommerkorn, J. Zhang, R. S. Thoma, and A. Molisch, “3D MIMO
Outdoor-to-Indoor Propagation Channel Measurement,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–1, 2017.
[20] K. Haneda, S. L. H. Nguyen, J. JŁrvelŁinen, and J. Putkonen, “Estimating
the omni-directional pathloss from directional channel sounding,” in 2016
10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), April
2016, pp. 1–5.

