Optimization of thermal comfort in building
through envelope design
Milorad Bojića, Alexandre Patou-Parvedyb, Harry Boyerc
a

Faculty of Engineering,Kragujevac , Serbia, milorad.bojic@gmail.com
Faculty of Engineering, Kragujevac, Serbia, parvedyalexandre@gmail.com,
c
LPBS, Equipe Physique et ingénierie mathématique appliquée à l’énergie et l’environnement, University of
Reunion Island, Reunion, France, Harry.Boyer@univ-reunion.fr
b

Abstract:
Due to the current environmental situation, energy saving has become the leading drive in modern
research. Although the residential houses in tropical climate do not use air conditioning to maintain
thermal comfort in order to avoid use of electricity. As the thermal comfort is maintained by adequate
envelope composition and natural ventilation, this paper shows that it is possible to determine the
thickness of envelope layers for which the best thermal comfort is obtained. The building is modeled in
EnergyPlus software and HookeJeves optimization methodology. The investigated house is a typical
residential house one-storey high with five thermal zones located at Reunion Island, France. Three

optimizations are performed such as the optimization of the thickness of the concrete block layer,
of the wood layer, and that of the thermal insulation layer. The results show optimal thickness of
thermal envelope layers that yield the maximum TC according to Fanger predicted mean vote.

Keywords:
Energy efficiency, Thermal insulation, Hooke-Jeeves optimization, EnergyPlus.

1. Introduction
Due to the current environmental situation, energy saving has become the leading drive in
modern research. To limit electricity consumption in tropical regions, it is important to achieve
the optimal thermal comfort in residential houses without using electricity. It is important in
tropical Reunion as in the last fifteen years, the consumption of energy has been multiplied by 2.
Reunion demography has significantly increasing and will continue to increase, and the energy
demand will depend on it.
Research in the optimization of thermal comfort was performed by Kurian et al [1], Magnier and
Haghighat[2] , Chantrelle et al [3], and Stavrakakis et al[4]. Kurian et al. showed that dimming
with a fuzzy logic based window blind controller provides complete optimization of thermal
comfort in the interior with energy savings. To optimize thermal comfort, Magnier and
Haghighat performed multiobjective optimization of building design HVAC system settings,
thermostat programming, and passive solar design. Chantrelle et al developed of a multicriteria
tool for optimizing the renovation of buildings where one of criteria was the optimized thermal
comfort. Stavrakakis et al optimized window-openings design for thermal comfort in naturally
ventilated buildings. However, the literature does not report the research on optimization of

1

thermal comfort by the adequate selection of width of layers in the building envelope
construction.
In this research, the objective is to enhance the thermal comfort in a house located in Reunion
Island without using electricity for air conditioning. In this direction, an optimization of the
thickness of house walls has been done. The optimized layers of the wall are the customary
materials used in Reunion Island namely concrete block, thermal insulation (glass wool) and
wood. Three optimizations are performed such as the optimization of the thickness of the
concrete block layer, of the wood layer, and that of the thermal insulation layer. In these
optimizations, other two layers are kept at constant width. These optimizations yield the
thickness of each layer of the wall for the best thermal comfort inside the house. The
optimization is performed by programming at GenOpt code where thermal comfort of the entire
house as an objective function is maximized. This code is coupled with an external simulation
program (EnergyPlus).

2. Description
2.1 House
In this study, the residential house has a floor surface of 162 m². The house consists of 2
bedrooms and, a kitchen, a living room and a toilet. A family of 4 peoples: 2 children and 2
parents live in the house. For each room, a occupancy schedule is recorded. The parents work
from 8 am to 6.30 pm. They spend their lunch break at the house from 12 am to 1.30 pm. During
the week, the children are at school from 8 am to 5.30 pm. For the weekend, the entire family
stays at the house. The infiltration is assumed to be 0.5 ach throughout these optimizations.

(a)

(b)

Fig. 1 The investigated Reunion residential house: (a) entire house, b) cut through the house

The wall layers in this house are of customary materials used in the wall construction in Reunion
Island. From the outside to the inside, the first layer is of wood, the second of glass wool, and the
third of concrete block. Their thickness, thermal conductivity, density and specific heat are given
in Table 1. During optimization, the thickness of each layer of the wall is varied in an interval
from 0.001m to 1m.

2

The concrete blocks are covered by a mortar layer of 1 mm and the wood by a varnish layer of
0.1 mm. These two layers are not considered in these optimizations.
Reunion is a hot and humid tropical island that lies to 21° south latitude and 55° east longitude.
Reunion Island has a yearly mean temperature of between 26ºC to 27ºC and has high daytime
temperatures of 29°C to 34°C and relative humidity of 70% to 90% throughout the year.
Table 1 Characteristics of the layers of the wall of the investigated house
Thickness
k

1
2
3

Wood
Glass wool
Concrete block

m
0.025
0.025
0.2032

W/m-K
0.15
0.04
1.11

kg/m3
608
11
800

c
J/kg-m3
1630
800
920

2.2 Software
The optimization is made with GenOpt software. GenOpt is an optimization program for the
minimization of a cost function that is evaluated by an external simulation program, such as
EnergyPlus, TRNSYS, SPARK, IDA-ICE or DOE-2. It has been developed for optimization
problems where the cost function is computationally expensive and its derivatives are not
available or may not even exist. GenOpt can be coupled to any simulation program that reads its
input from text files and writes its output to text files. The independent variables can be
continuous variables (possibly with lower and upper bounds), discrete variables, or both.
Constraints on dependent variables can be implemented using penalty or barrier functions.
2.3Thermal comfort
The thermal comfort climate is defined as ―that state of mind which expresses satisfaction with
the thermal environment‖ [5]. So, thermal comfort is very difficult to objectively quantify
because it relies on a wide range of environmental and personal factors that decides on what will
make people feel thermally comfortable.
Thermal comfort is maintained when the heat generated by human metabolism is allowed to
dissipate, thus maintaining thermal equilibrium with the surroundings. It has been long
recognized that the sensation of feeling hot or cold is not just dependent on air temperature
alone.
At present, two different approaches for the definition of thermal comfort coexist, each one with
its potentialities and limits: the rational or heat-balance approach and the adaptive approach. The
rational approach uses data from climate chamber studies to support its theory, best characterized
by the works of Fanger while the adaptive approach uses data from field studies of people in
building. Fanger’s Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) model was developed in the 1970’s from
laboratory and climate chamber studies. In these studies, participants were dressed in
standardised clothing and completed standardised activities, while exposed to different thermal
environments. In some studies the researchers chose the thermal conditions, and participants
recorded how hot or cold they felt, using the seven-point ASHRAE thermal sensation scale
shown in Table 2. In other studies, participants controlled the thermal environment themselves,

3

adjusting the temperature until they felt thermally ‘neutral’ (i.e. neither hot nor cold; equivalent to
voting ‘0’ on the ASHRAE thermal sensation scale).

Table.2: Seven point thermal sensation scale [6]

Maintaining this heat balance is the first condition for achieving a neutral thermal sensation.
However, Fanger noted that ‗‗man‘s thermoregulatory system is quite effective and will
therefore create heat balance within wide limits of the environmental variables, even if comfort
does not exist‘‘.
To be able to predict conditions where thermal neutrality would occur, Fanger investigated the
body‘s physiological processes when it is close to neutral.
That comfort equation was expanded using data from 1296 participants. The resulting equation
described thermal comfort as the imbalance between the actual heat flow from the body in a
given thermal environment and the heat flow required for optimum (i.e. neutral) comfort for a
given activity. This expanded equation related thermal conditions to the seven-point ASHRAE
thermal sensation scale, and became known as the ‗‗Predicted Mean Vote‘‘ (PMV) index.
The PMV index suggested by Fanger predicts the mean response of a large group of people
according to the ASHRAE thermal sensation scale.
2.4 Objective function
The objective function that was minimised is the total PMV given as
PMVtotal =
C main room PMVmain room + Ckitchen PMVkitchen+ Cbedroom1 PMVbedroom1 + Cbedroom2 PMVbedroom2 (8)
where C main room = 0.4169 is the weight coefficient for the part of the time that the family spends
in the main room during one year, Ckitchen = 0.3533 is the weight coefficient for the part of the
time that the family spends in the kitchen during one year, Cbedroom1 =0.1896 is the weight
coefficient for the part of the time that the family spends in the bedroom 1 during one year,
Cbedroom1 = 0.0402 is the weight coefficient for the part of the time that the family spends in the
bedroom 2 during one year. The part of the time that family spends in a room is a ratio of the
time that the family spends in one room, and the total time the family spends in the entire house.
The PMV for each zone is the output of EnergyPlus for the modelled house.

4

3. Results and discussion
The purpose of this research is to improve (decrease) the PMV (the thermal comfort) in the
house for the optimized house. Three optimization runs are performed to find the compositions
of the wall that give the best thermal comfort. As the external wall has three layers, Three
optimizations are performed such as the optimization of the thickness of the concrete block layer,
of the wood layer, and that of the thermal insulation layer. Each optimization run gives the
optimum width of different layer while keeping other two at the constant width.

2.5

PMV

2
1.5

PMV total

1

PMV MR

0.5

PMV KIT
PMV BR1

0

PMV BR2

Fig.3: Comparison of PMV between house no optimized and house with different layer optimized

Figure 3 shows the total PMV and the PMV for each room in the house without optimization and
three houses with optimization of a wall layer. Generally, the house with the optimized wall
layer has a better PMV than the house without any optimization. The PMV of the house without
any optimization is around 1.45. With the optimization, this value drops to about 0.5, by 34.5 %.
The house with the optimized block layer seems to be the best constructive solution. The total
PMV is around 0.55 instead to of 1.45 for house without an optimization. Then, the PMV of each
room drops significantly to be around 0.5. In the main room (MR), the PMV is around 0.7
instead 1.15 for the house without optimization. This drop by 60.86 % gives a neutral sensation
of thermal comfort for the inhabitant instead previous slight warm sensation. The most
noticeable drop in PMV is in the kitchen (KIT). In the house without optimization, the PMV is
around 2.10 which gives a warm sensation of thermal comfort. After the optimization the PMV
drops to 0.82.
The house with the optimized wood layer is also a good constructive solution. In comparison
with the previous case, the PMV in the kitchen is a little bit higher and is around 0.85. For the
rest of rooms, the PMV is around 0.5 that is similar to the previous case.

5

The house with the optimized insulation layer is the worst solution. Even if the total PMV and
that for the others rooms yield to a neutral sensation of comfort, the PMV of the kitchen is 1.17
meaning that occupants in kitchen have slightly warm sensation of thermal comfort.
Figure 4 shows the thickness of the wall layers for a house without and with three optimizations.
The house without optimization has the thickness of concrete blocks of 160 mm, of thermal
insulation (glass wool) of 25mm, and wood of 25mm. However the thickness of the wall varies
for each optimization run. For the house where the concrete block is optimized, the thickness of
the concrete block is 200 mm which is 40mm thicker than that for the house without
optimization. The thickness of the entire wall is now 250 mm instead 210mm-the rise of 19%.
For the house where the wood is optimized, the wood layer thickness is 100 mm instead of
25mm for the house without optimization. The wood layer is normally used as a decoration so
the optimized layer width seems to be very thick for the practical applications. In the house
where the thermal insulation layer is optimized, the thermal insulation width is also 100 mm
instead 25mm. The total thickness of the wall in each case goes up. In these two cases of the
optimization, the total thickness of the wall is 285 mm that is a rise of 36%.
250

Thickness (mm)

200
150
Block
100

Wood
Insulation

50
0
House
House with House with House with
without
optimization optimization optimization
optimization
of block
of wood
of insulation

Fig.4: Thickness of the wall layers for a house with optimizations and without optimization

3. Conclusion
The optimization of the thickness of the wall gives better thermal comfort during the time that
the family is in the house. The total PMV drops by 34.5% and the PMV of each room by about
60%.
The thermal comfort is better when the wall is thicker. In fact in the initial house, the thickness
of the wall was 210 mm and in the optimized house the wall is equal and over 250 mm.
The best case is when the concrete block is optimized. Then, the thickness of the wall rises by
40mm (19%), the total PMV is around 0.55 and the PMV of each room gives a neutral sensation
of comfort. The optimized thermal insulation gives a good PMV, however its thickness is
increased by 300%. The optimized wood layer give the worst results.
6

Acknowledgment
This paper is a result of two project investigations: (1) project TR33015 of Technological
Development of Republic of Serbia, and (2) project III 42006 of Integral and Interdisciplinary
investigations of Republic of Serbia. The first project is titled ―Investigation and development of
Serbian zero-net energy house‖, and the second project is titled ―Investigation and development
of energy and ecological highly effective systems of poly-generation based on renewable energy
sources. We would like to thank to the Ministry of Education and Science of Republic of Serbia
for their financial support during these investigations.

References
[1] Kurian CP, Aithal RS, Bhat J, George VI (2008a). Robust control and optimization of energy
consumption in daylight—Artificial light integrated schemes. Lighting Research and
Technology, 40(1): 7 – 2.
[2] Laurent Magnier, Fariborz Haghighat, Multiobjective optimization of building design using
TRNSYS simulations, genetic algorithm, and Artificial Neural Network, Building and
Environment 45 (2010) 739–746
[3] Fanny Pernodet Chantrelle, Hicham Lahmidi, Werner Keilholz, Mohamed El Mankibi, Pierre
Michel, Development of a multicriteria tool for optimizing the renovation of buildings, Applied
Energy 88 (2011) 1386–139
[4] G.M. Stavrakakis, P.L. Zervas, H. Sarimveis, N.C. Markatos, Optimization of windowopenings design for thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings, Applied Mathematical
Modelling, Volume 36, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 193–211
[5] Patrick Taffé, A Qualitative Response Model of Thermal Comfort, Building and
Environment, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 115-121. 1997, PII: S0360-1323(96)00035-2.
[6] 2009 ASHRAE HANDBOOK Fundamentals

7

