Research on fresh agricultural product based on
the retailer’s overconfidence under options and
spot markets
Kai Nie1,
School of Economy and Trade, Hunan University, Changsha 410079, Hunan, China

d_niekai@163.com
Man Yu2
School of Economy and Trade, Hunan University, Changsha 410079, Hunan, China

lingsheshidubing@163.com
(1.School of Economy and Trade, Hunan University, Changsha 410079, Hunan, China

ABSTRACT:

In this article, we analyze the application of options contract in the special commodity
supply chain such as fresh agricultural products. This problem is discussed from the point of the retailer.
When spot market and future market are both available, we discuss how the retailer chooses the optimal
production. Furthermore, overconfidence is introduced to the supply chain of the fresh agricultural
products, which has not happened before. Then，based on the overconfidence of the retailer, we explore
how overconfidence affects the supply chain system under different circumstances. At last, we get the
conclusion that different overconfidence level has different affection on retailer’s optimal ordering
quantity and profit.

KEYWORDS:

fresh agricultural product; overconfidence; options contract; freshness; ordering

strategy.

1. Introduction
Agriculture is the basic department in one country’s economy, supporting all human’s life. Nearly
all nations’ governments pay more attention to the development of agriculture. In the No.1 document, it
is proposed to speed up the development of the distribution channels of agriculture products, to improve
the grades and levels of the circulation of them. It also emphasized that we need to make full use of the
modern information technology, give full play to the agriculture future market to guide the production
and averse the risk. The fresh agricultural products are the necessities in our daily life. It is very
important for our health. With the development of our economy, we require more in freshness.
Furthermore, developing fresh agriculture products is also an important method to enhance the income of
the peasants. As one kind of special products, fresh agriculture products are featured with deteriorated
and perished. Some may be wasted when circulating. In order to speed up the circulation of them and
reduce wastage, some scholars research them in the point of supply chain. Cai[1] brought management of
supply chain to the field of fresh agriculture, studied the coordination of fresh agricultural supply chain
under the condition of pricing FOB. Chen Jun, Dan Bin etc. [2] introduced the freshness attenuation law
to the agriculture product inventory model for deteriorating, which is expressed by the form of
exponential function , explored the multi-level price discounts order policy of suppliers under the
elasticity of demand condition. Wang lei and Li Yuyu [3] established the consumer utility model with
considering the freshness, price and time variation, then, analyzed the retailer's optimal order strategy.
Under the condition of the single three-stage supply chain, Lin Lue etc. [4] analyzed supply chain
coordination of fresh agriculture product with time limited. Finally they gave the conclusion that the
revenue sharing contract can be effectively coordinated.
With the deepening study of supply chain, more and more scholars introduce options into the supply
chain. Barnes Schuster etc.[5]studied the application of options contracts in the two-stage supply chain
system, in which the demand is correlated, reflecting the flexibility of options under uncertain conditions.
Ritchken PH etc.[6] proposed that options contract is one form of contracts combining option with the
traditional ordering methods. To a certain degree, it can improve the flexibility of supply chain, as well
as strengthen cooperation in the supply chain. Chen Xiangfeng, Zhu Chenbo etc. [7] introduced options

into the supply chain procurement, explained the process of adjusting the interests of all parties of the
supply chain and risk-sharing by using option. Ning Zhong and Lin Bin [8] studied the application of
stand-alone option mechanism and embedded options mechanism in supply chain management, analyzed
the effects of options contract in supply chain performance, pointed out that the options could achieve
the effect of revenue sharing and risk sharing. Many scholars also studied the supply chain of fresh
agricultural products. Wang Jing etc. [9] drew options contract into fresh agricultural products, analyzed
the wholesalers’ ordering policies both in the spot market and future market at the same time, and
obtained the optimal order quantities under the combination of both two kinds of markets. The defect of
the article is ignoring the analysis of stock after introducing it.
Nowadays the wholesalers and retailers are more and more powerful than before, the dominance of
the market has changed to some extent. However, some scholars’ model designs lack rationality.
Furthermore, former studies are based on the assumption of rational people, ignoring their behavioral
characteristics and other irrational factors, such as overconfidence and so on. In actual transactions, the
participants tend to be over-confident and more optimistic of their own abilities, knowledge, and
predictions about the future performance[10].Based on the above considerations, this paper attempts to
establish a more reasonable model to analyze the optimal ordering policy of fresh agricultural product in
the view of retailers.

2. Model Description
The model is explored by a retailer and a supplier of single-cycle supply chain
system, circulating with fresh and perishable agricultural product. This paper is analyzed from the
point of the retailer. The retailer can purchase the order both in the spot market and the option market.
In the process of cooperation, the retailer decides the option price and the executed price [11], the
supplier can ensure all orders of the retailer according to the contract. What’s more, the retailer is
overconfident of the market demand. In order to facilitate discussion, now the parameters of the model
and their meanings are explained as follows:
w: wholesale price, p :sale price of fresh product, g: out of stock cost, x: the demand of product,  :

c0 : option premium, ce : executed price of option,  : the loss of fresh
agricultural products in the unloading and transportation process, 0    1 ,  : freshness of products,
expectation of market demand,

0    1 , T: circle of ordering, Q1 : when the options contract is made by the wholesaler, the order
quantity in the spot market by one cycle, Qq : when the options contract is made by the supplier, the
order quantity in the future market by one cycle, F ( x) : the cumulative distribution function of fresh
agricultural product market demand, f  x  : the probability density function of fresh agricultural
product market demand, Fr ( x) : the cumulative distribution function of the market demand of fresh
agricultural product recognized by the wholesaler, f r  x  :the probability density function of fresh

agricultural product market demand recognized by the wholesaler.
Underlying assumptions are as follows:
(1) k presents the level of overconfidence of the retailer, k x is the demand of the market recognized
by the retailer, when 0  k  1, it tells the retailer’s cognition of adverse signals of market demand,
when k  1 , it presents the retailer’s cognition of favorable signals about the market demand.
(2) The initial inventory is zero, and the fresh agricultural products are not returnable, which is
determined by their characteristics, and the remaining residual value is very small, they can
be considered to be zero.
(3) The shortage cost is transferred to the supplier by virtue of the retailer’s strong negotiation skills.
(4) w0  ce  c0 , otherwise, retailers will order all the products in the options market.

3. Model analysis
3.1 The supplier’s outcome policies
As the follower, the retailer determines its own ordering quantity to maximize its profit. Therefore,
the retailer's expected profit can be expressed as:

E r  pE[ kx  Q(1   )]  c0Qq (1   )  ce E[( kx  Q1 (1   ))  Qq (1   )]  w0Q1 (1   )
 gE[ kx  (Q1  Qq )(1   )]
 ( p  g )(Q1  Qq )(1   )  ( p  g  ce ) k 

( Q1  Qq )(1  )

k

0

Q1 (1  )
k
0

 ce k 

(1)

F ( x)dx  (c0  ce )Qq (1   )

F ( x)dx  w0Q1 (1   )  g k 

Proposition 1: When the supplier supports the shortage cost, its optimal outcome of fresh
agriculture product is

Q* 

p  g  ce  c0
k
 k 1 c0  ce  w0 ， *
F 1 (
) ， Q1* 
F (
) Qq  Q*  Q1*
1 
p  g  ce
1 
ce

(2)

Proof：We take a derivative with respect to Qq 、 Q1 , there is

E r
1
 ( p  g )(1   )  ( p  g  ce )(1   ) F ( (Q1  Qq )(1   ))  (c0  ce )(1   )
Qq
k
E r
1
 ( p  g )(1   )  ( p  g  ce )(1   ) F ( (Q1  Qq )(1   ))
Q1
k
1
Q (1   ))  w0 (1   )
k 1
Order E r  0 ， E r  0 ，then, we can get Q*  k F 1 ( p  g  ce  c0 ) ，
Q1
1 
p  g  ce
Qq
 ce (1   ) F (

Q1* 

 k 1 c0  ce  w0
F (
) ，here, Proposition was proofed.
1 
ce

Put (2) in (1), the retailer’s optimal expected profit can be written as follows:
Q* (1  )
k
0

E r  ( p  g )Q (1   )  ( p  g  ce ) k 
*

*

Q1* (1  )
k
0

 ce k 

F ( x)dx  (c0  ce )Qq* (1   )

（3）

F ( x)dx  w0Q1* (1   )  g k 

Under the condition of decentralized decision making, the supplier’s profit is：

 s  w0Q1 (1   )  c0Qq (1   )  ce min[ x  Q1 (1   ), Qq (1   )]  cQ ，

（4）

Then, its expected profit is

E s  w0Q (1   )  (c0  ce )Qq (1   )  ce 
*
1

Q* (1  )

*

0



F ( x)dx  ce 

Q1* (1  )



0

F ( x)dx  cQ*

（5）

3.2 Analysis of the impact of overconfidence
3.2.1 Impact of Overconfidence on retailer’s ordering quantity
Proposition2: the optimal total ordering quantity and spot market quantity are increasing
function of overconfidence level.
When the retailer is entirely rational, it can judge the real demand of the market, according to the
real demand, it decides its ordering quantity. So, the totally rational retailer’s profit is as follows:

E r 0  ( p  g )(Q1  Qq )(1   )  ( p  g  ce ) 

( Q1  Qq )(1  )



F ( x)dx

0

 (c0  ce )Qq (1   )  ce 

Q1 (1  )



0

（6）

F ( x)dx  w0Q1 (1   )  g

Then, we can get the totally rational retailer’s optimal ordering quantities:

Q0* 


1 

F 1 (

p  g  ce  c0
c  c  w0

) ， Q01* 
F 1 ( 0 e
) ， Q0q*  Q*  Q1*
p  g  ce
1 
ce

(7)

Compared the expression (2) to (7), we know that the optimal total ordering quantity and spot market
ordering quantity are both linear functions of the level of overconfidence k, there is a positive correlation
between k and optimal total ordering quantity. It can be expressed as follows: When a favorable signal is
shown on the market, it means k> 1, the higher level of overconfidence of the retailer is, the greater

Q*

*

and Q1 are; When there are adverse market signals, that is to say 0< k <1, more overconfident the
retailer is, smaller

Q* and Q1* are. Option ordering quantity has no relationship with overconfidence

coefficient.
(2). Impact of Overconfidence on supplier’s profit
From the optimal ordering quantities and optimal outcome, we could get

E s 0  w0Q1 (1   )  (c0  ce )Qq (1   )  ce 

Q* (1  )



0

F ( x)dx  ce 

Q1* (1  )

0



F ( x)dx  cQ

（8）

Proposition 3：Because of the overconfidence of the retailer, the profit of supplier is not stable.
That is to say its profit is very easy to change.
Proof: compared the two kinds of profit, we know
Q* (1  )
k
0

E s 0  E s  (1  k )[ w0Q1 (1   )  (c0  ce )Qq (1   )  ce 
Q1* (1  )
k
0

 ce 

F ( x)dx

（9）

F ( x)dx  cQ* ]

When 0<k<1， E s 0  E s1  0 ，the retailer’s overconfidence will reduce the supplier’s profit.
What’s more, the higher the overconfidence level is, the smaller the supplier’s profit is. When k>1,

E s 0  E s1  0 , the retailer’s overconfidence will improve the supplier’s profit.

3.3 The optimal decisions under Centralized decision-making condition
Under centralized decision-making, we aims to research on the whole supply chain performance status. At
this point, as the decision maker, the supplier treats maximizing profit of the whole supply chain as the goal,
to decide the optimal production. By assumes, we know that the supplier is fully rational, so the whole
supply chain profit can be expressed as:

E  pE[ x  Q(1   )]  cQ  gE[ x  Q(1   )]
 ( p  g )Q(1   )  ( p  g ) 

Q (1  )



0

（10）

F ( x)dx  cQ  g

Take derivative with respect to Qq 、 Q1 ,

E
 ( p  g )(1   )  ( p  g )(1   ) F (Q(1   ) )  c ，then, we could get the optimal ordering

Q

quantity Q**  

1 

F 1 (

( p  g )(1   )  c .
)
( p  g )(1   )

（11）

3.4 Control and adjustment of retailer’s overconfidence level
When the retailer is overconfident about the market demand of fresh agricultural product, the
interests of both sides will change with the level of retailer's overconfidence. At this time, the supply
chain as a whole does not reach the best situation. What's more, the fluctuation in the level of
overconfidence is not conducive to the cooperation between the two sides. It is necessary to find a
suitable way to eliminate the impact of retailer's overconfidence. Croson [12] designed a buy-back
contract and wholesale-price contract to eliminate the retailer's overconfidence in general supply chain.
Due to the higher requirements of fresh agricultural product, the perishable feature determines the
products cannot be returned. As a flexible tool, options can be used to achieve the coordination of the
supply chain. In this article, we attempt to use the option contract to control the retailer's overconfidence,
so as to coordinate the fresh agriculture supply chain at last.
Proposition 4: when c0 and ce satisfy c0  ( p  g  ce )[1  F ( 1 F 1 ( ( p  g )(1   )  c ))] , the
k
( p  g )(1   )
outcome is optimal.
Proof: from the context we know that the profit of the whole supply chain can be maximized just
while Q**  Q* ，  F 1 ( ( p  g )(1   )  c )   k F 1 ( p  g  ce  c0 ) ，solve this equation, we get
1 
( p  g )(1   )
1 
p  g  ce

1
( p  g )(1   )  c , by now, the proposition is proofed.
c0  ( p  g  ce )[1  F ( F 1 (
))]
k
( p  g )(1   )
Furthermore，according to (12), the anti correlation exists in option price and the overconfidence
coefficient, the higher the retailers' overconfidence level is, the smaller the option price.

4. Numerical example
Her we use matlab7.0 to do the numerical analysis. Assume there is a supermarket ordering fresh
fish from a supplier. They can finish the trade both in the spot market or the option market. Here we just
analyze the profit of the supermarket. We assume that the market demand is subject to normal
distribution. Wholesale price w0  25 , sale price p =50, out of stock cost g=10,   0.1 ,   0.8 , the
fresh agriculture product demand obeys uniform distribution between (0,100), the initial option price

c0  5 ，then

ce  60 

90k ，assume c  35 ，then c  25  325 .
e
0
18k
18k  13

When other parameters are

established, the optimal order quantity Q and market order Q1 can be calculated. By calculating, the
relationship between optimal order quantities and the overconfident coefficient can be described as
follows:： Q*  64.2, Q1*  800k [1  20(18k  13) ] ， Qq*  Q*  Q1* ，the relationship between
9
60(18k  13)  90k
optimal profit of the retailer and the overconfident coefficient：

E s1 

1587600k 4  57960000k 3  8738701k 2  6048302k  1561560 。
3(18k  13)(33k  26)

The relationship among the variables is reflected in graphs as follows:

Pic1: the relationship between ce and k

Pic3: the relationship between

Q1* and k

Pic2: the relationship between c0 and k

Pic4: the relationship between

 s and k

Figure 1 and figure 2 show that the option price and the executed price of option are increasing
functions of overconfidence level k, they have the same changing direction of overconfidence coefficient.
Figure 3 shows that on the premise of realizing supply chain coordination, when k = 1, namely when the
retailer is perfectly rational, its spot order is minimum; When the retailer’s overconfidence exists, the
physical quantity is greater than rational, and the higher the retailer’s overconfidence level is, the larger
its spot ordering quantity is. Figure 4 shows that when the market appears negative signals, the more
rational the retailer is, the greater the profits of the supplier is; and when the market is in a good
indication, the higher the retailer’s overconfidence level, the greater the profits of supplier. By analysis
of the above situation, we know it is consistent with theoretical model and actual situation.

5. Conclusion
This paper changes the mode of the traditional supply chain that the retailer is fully rational, in fact,
the irrational factors are always exiting, such as overconfidence. In this article we analyzed the impact of
overconfidence on the fresh agriculture product supply chain. Furthermore, based on the influence of the
retailer’s overconfidence on the prediction of market demand, we analyzed the case of the wholesaler
setting options, how the overconfident coefficient affects the optimal quantities and the profits as well as
how the optimal ordering quantity varies. Finally, we could draw the conclusion that the optimal order
quantities are related to the level of overconfidence. When the prospect of market is good,
overconfidence of the retailer has a positive effect, and vise verse. Nowadays, with the buyers’ status and
role gradually improving, the initiative also correspondingly increases in the market. By the way, they
will develop more options contracts which are conducive to themselves. This article just analyses the
single-cycle, one-to-one mode of supply chain, so more detailed and deeper research could be made
about order strategy of fresh agricultural products.

Acknowledgement:

This article is supported by Province natural science fund project
(Modeling and optimizing the cross-regional emergency logistics information integration system
13JJB001). Thanks for its help and support.

References:
[1] Cai X Q, Chen J, Xiao Y Betal. Optimal decisions of the manufacturer and distributor in a fresh
product supply chain involving long distance transportation [R].Working Paper, School of Economics
and Management, Tsinghua University, 2006.
[2]Chen Jun, Dan Bin, Zhang Xuemei EOQ model for fresh agricultural product under progressive price
discount and loss-controlling [J] Systems-engineering Theory & Practice Vol.29 No.7 July, 2009 43-54.
[3] Dan Bin, Wang Lei, Li Yuyu An EOQ Model for Fresh Agricultural Product Considering Customer
Utility and Fresh keeping [J] Chinese Journal of Management Science Vol. 19, No. 1 February, 2011
100-108.
[4] Lin Lue, Yang Shuping, Dan Bin Three level Supply Chain Coordination of Fresh Agricultural
Products with Time Constraints [J] Chinese Journal of Management Science Vol.19, No.3 June, 2011
55-62.
[5] Barnes—Schuster D，Bassok Y AnupindiR．Coordinating and flexibility in supply contracts with
options[J]．Manufacturing and Service Operation management,2002，4(3)：170—208．
[6] Ritchken P H，Tapiero CS ．Contingent claims contracting for purchasing decisions in inventory
management [J]．Operations Research，1986，34(6) 865—870.
[7] Chen Xiangfeng, Zhu Chenbo Real options and supply chain procurement contracts [J] JOURNAL
OF SYST EMS ENGINEERING Vol. 22 No. 4 Aug. 2007 401-406.
[8] Ning Zhong, Lin Bin Option mechanism in supply chain risk management [J] JOURNAL OF SYST
EMS ENGINEERING Vol. 22 No. 2 Apr. 2007 141-147.
[9] Wang Jing，Chen Xu Fresh produce wholesaler’s optimal procurement decisions with options
contracts [J] Systems Engineering—Theory＆Practice Vol.30, No.12 Dec. 2010 2137-2144.
[10] Malmendier U, TateG. Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the markets' reaction
[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2008, 89(1): 20-43.
[11] Cai Hongwen，Cai Hongwu，ZHang Dianye Fuzzy option contract with jointed advertising
investment sharing in a retailer-led supply chain [J] JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING Vol.26
No. 3 Jun. 2011 322-329.
[12] Croson D，Croson R，Ren Y． How to manage an overconfident newsvendor［J］ Working
paper．2008．15-18.
[13]Chia-Hsuan Yeh, Chun-Yi Yang Examining the Effects of Traders’ Overconfidence on Market
Behavior [J] Agent-Based Social Systems, 2011:19-31
[14]MalmendierU, TateG. Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the markets' reaction[J].
Journal of Financial Economics, 2008, 89(1): 20-43.
[15]Landier A, Thesmar D. Financial Contracting with Optimistic Entrepreneurs [J]. Review of Financial
Studies, 2009, 22 (1): 117-132.
[16] Cachon, G. Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts in Handbooks in Operations Research and
Management Science: Supply Chain Management, 2003.Chapter 11. edited by Graves, S.,T. D. Kok.
North-Holland, Amsterdam.

