Proceedings of the
Annual Stability Conference
Structural Stability Research Council
San Antonio, Texas, March 21-24, 2017

Simulation of conventional cold-formed steel sections formed from Advanced
High Strength Steel (AHSS)
Hamid Foroughi1 and Benjamin W. Schafer2
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to explore the potential impact of the use of advanced high strength
steel (AHSS) to form traditional cold-formed steel structural members. In this study, shell finite
element models are constructed, and geometric and material nonlinear collapse analysis
performed, on simulated lipped channel cross-section cold-formed steel members roll-formed
from AHSS. AHSS sheet is currently being used in automotive applications with thickness ranging
from 0.35 to 0.8 mm (0.0138 to 0.0315 in.) and yield strengths from 350 to 1250 MPa (51 to 181
ksi). However, AHSS has not yet been employed in cold-formed steel construction. To assess the
impact of the adoption of AHSS on cold-formed steel member strength a group of forty standard
structural lipped channel cross-sections are chosen from the Steel Framing Industry Association
product list and simulated with AHSS material properties. The stress-strain models used in this
study are based on AHSS in production, including dual-phase and martensitic steels. The
simulations consider compression with work on bending about the major axis in progress. Three
different bracing conditions are employed so that the impact of local, distortional, and global
buckling, including interactions can be explored. Due to the higher yield stresses of AHSS the
potential for interaction and mode switching is anticipated to be greater in these members
compared with conventional mild steels. The simulations provide a direct means to assess the
increase in strength created by the application of AHSS, while also allowing for future exploration
of the increase in buckling mode interaction, imperfection sensitivity, and strain demands inherent
in the larger capacities. The work is intended to be an initial step in a longer-term effort to foster
innovation in the application of new steels in cold-formed steel construction.

1

Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, hforoug1@jhu.edu

2

Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, schafer@jhu.edu

1. Introduction
Cold-formed steel (CFS) structural members use cold bent sheet steel to provide efficient structural
shapes that are noncombustible and highly structurally efficient. Use of cold-formed steel members
continues to grow for both architectural and structural applications in building construction. Due
to the manufacturing process thicknesses are naturally limited and ultimate strength of practical
shapes is thus necessarily limited to a relatively modest value. Advanced High Strength Steels
(AHSS) have been developed for the automotive industry over the last 20 years (Keeler and
Kimchi 2014). AHSS sheet has yield stresses as high as 1250 MPa and are able to maintain large
ultimate tensile elongations (>10%) even for these high yield stresses. As a result AHSS can be
readily formed/manufactured and supply material yield values that are significantly in excess of
current applications in CFS building construction. With this new strength comes new potential for
design, particularly in mid-rise applications for CFS structural members.
Existing design specifications, such as the Direct Strength Method (DSM) in AISI S100-12,
provide a potential design framework for CFS members formed from AHSS, but the validity of
the provided rules has not been substantiated for higher strength steels. AISI S100-12 strength
predictions include local-global (L-G) interaction, but based on experimental results at the time
(Schafer 2002, Schafer 2008) excluded local-distortional (L-D), distortional-global (D-G), and
local-distortional-global (L-D-G) interaction. More recent experimental research has shown that
for higher strength (non AHSS) steels, such as G550 (Fy=550 MPa (80 ksi)), L-D interaction
should be included (Yap and Hancock 2008, 2011). The interaction becomes more pronounced
because of the additional local post-buckling demands, and because higher strength sections use
thinner sheet steel requiring additional intermediate stiffeners, further complicating the response.
Lead by Prof. Camotim at TU-Lisbon, Yap and Hancocks’s findings motivated new activity in
buckling mode interaction for members. They began by using shell FE simulations and
demonstrated conditions where L-D interaction may be significant (Dinis et al. 2011, Camotim
and Dinis 2011, Silvestre et al. 2012). They then collaborated on a small test series on G550
columns to physically demonstrate L-D interaction and its related strength erosion (Young et al.
2013). Finally, additional simulations on simple and complex cross-sections and proposed design
recommendations were provided (Dinis et al. 2014, Dinis and Camotim 2015, Martins et al. 2015,
2016). Work remains though as the AHSS steel grades have unique material response not captured
in the studies on low ductility high strength G550 steel – and agreed upon solutions for handling
these interactions are still needed.
Shell finite element (FE) models have proven to be a robust tool for exploring the strength of thinwalled cold-formed steel members (Schafer et al. 2010, Foroughi et al. 2014). Therefore, they are
employed here to examine the impact of AHSS material properties on CFS member strength. This
brief paper first summarizes the numerical modeling conducted, including boundary conditions,
element choice, material model, and imperfections. Next the paper provides a summary of the
strength results in comparison with the AISI-S100 strength predictions employing DSM. This
summary is followed by brief comments on the results and a discussion of future work. This study
is an initial step towards a longer-term study on the application of AHSS in CFS buildings and the
development of improved design guidance.

2

2. Numerical modeling
Shell finite element models of cold-formed steel members are developed and analyzed in
ABAQUS. The based details of the developed models are provided in this section.
A total of six types of AHSS including both dual-phase and martensitic steels are considered here,
as shown in Figure 1. In addition, a mild steel with yield stress 207 Mpa (30 Ksi) has also been
selected for baseline comparison. To aid in comparisons across the materials the elastic modulus
has been set to 203,500 MPa (29500 ksi) and the Poisson’s ratio to 0.3 for all materials. Note, for
application in ABAQUS the engineering stress-strain is converted to true stress-strain.

Figure 1. Engineering stress-strain curves for different type of AHSS (Keeler and Kimchi (2014))

Forty standard structural lipped channel cross-sections from the Steel Framing Industry
Association (SFIA) product manual are selected for study as detailed in Table 1. The
nomenclature, e.g. 250S162-33 provides the nominal wed depth in inches 250=2.5 in. (63.5mm),
the flange width in inches 162=1.62 in. (41.1mm), and the material designation thickness in mils
33 mils = 0.033 in. (0.84 mm) – note designation thickness is not equal to design or minimum
delivered thickness. Round corners (r = 2t per SFIA) are considered in the models. The members
are meshed using the quadratic shell element S9R5 in ABAQUS with a mesh density consistent
with Figure 2. The length of the studied members is three times the critical length for distortional
buckling, as determined by CUFSM with simply-supported end boundary conditions.

(a) local b.c.
(b) distortional b.c.
(c) global b.c.
(d) local b.c. along the length
Figure 2. Depiction of cross-section boundary conditions (b.c.) to establish different models

3

To help separate the buckling response of the members three cross-section boundary conditions
are explored as depicted in Figure 2. The local model (Figure 2a) allows only local buckling in the
cross-section. The distortional model (Figure 2b) allows local and/or distortional buckling. The
global model (Figure 2c) allows local, and/or distortional, and/or global buckling. Thus, the local
model isolates L; the distortional model allows L, D, and L-D; while the global model allows all
possibilities. The end boundary conditions in the model are locally pinned. All translation degrees
of freedom are tied to a reference node at the shear center. The reference node is pinned and
restricted from torsion at one end and restricted from in-plane translation at the other end. All
actions on the model are applied at the reference node.
Table 1. List of cold-formed steel cross sections for parametric study
Thickness
Designation
33
43
54
68
97
250S162
ü
ü
ü
ü
250S137
ü
350S162
ü
ü
ü
362S137
ü
362S162
ü
362S200
ü
ü
400S137
ü
400S162
400S200
ü
ü
ü
550S162
ü
ü
ü
600S137
ü
ü
ü
600S162
ü
ü
600S200
ü
ü
ü
ü
800S137
ü
ü
800S162
ü
800S200
ü
800S250
ü
ü
1000S162
ü
1000S200
ü
1200S162
ü
1200S200
ü
1200S250
ü
1200S162
ü

A surrogate finite strip model in CUFSM is used to generate geometric imperfections. A linear
combination of the first local, distortional, and global buckling mode are used as the geometric
imperfection distribution. The imperfection magnitude employs the 50% probability of
exceedance values from Zeinoddini and Schafer (2012), as given in Table 2.

CFD
50%

Table 2. Selected 50% imperfection exceedance values
Global
Local
Distortional
Bowl
Camber
Twist
(δ/t)
(δ/t)
(L/δ)
(L/δ)
(Deg/m)
0.31
0.75
2909
4010
0.30

Residual stresses and strains are not considered in the models at this time.

4

3. Simulation results and discussion
For each studied cross-section the member is compressed until a peak strength (PFE) is achieved.
Although complete response is of interest for future work, here only PFE is considered. For the
local buckling boundary condition (Figure 2a), across the 40 studied members, and the 5 AHSS
material grades and one mild steel grade, the normalized PFE as a function of local slenderness is
provided in Figure 3 and compared with the DSM strength prediction for local buckling alone
(PnLo). PnLo is determined from the DSM expressions in AISI S100-12 with the global strength set
equal to the squash load of the column (Py). The results indicate good, but slightly conservative
agreement for the DSM prediction in isolated local buckling. For isolated local buckling the
models do not indicate a significant need for change in strength prediction to incorporate AHSS.

Figure 3. Comparison between DSM and AHSS member results under local boundary conditions of Figure 2a

For the distortional buckling boundary condition (Figure 2b) across the studied members the
strength results are provided in Figure 4. If DSM predicts isolated local buckling controls
(PnLo<PnD) then the PFE results are plotted against the DSM local curve, as in Figure 4a. If
distortional buckling is predicted to occur, per existing DSM rules (PnD<PnLo) then the PFE are
plotted against the distortional curve, as in Figure 4b. The results indicate that (1) distortional
buckling is predicted to be far more prevalent in the AHSS materials with higher Fy and (2) the
DSM distortional curve is generally a good predictor of strength, but greater scatter exists in
comparison with local buckling. The DSM design method as provided in AISI S100-12 and
examined here does not consider L-D interaction. For the studied cross-sections, boundary
conditions, member length, and material grades the interaction appears weak. (Note, PcrL/PcrD
ranges from 0.3 to 1.2, and 11 of the 40 studied members have 0.9<PcrL/PcrD<1.1).

Figure 4. Comparison between DSM and AHSS member results under distortional boundary conditions of Figure 2b
for specimens predicted as (a) local buckling controlled, and (b) distortional buckling controlled.

5

For the global buckling boundary condition (Figure 2b) across the studied members the strength
results are provided in Figure 5. For this boundary condition L, D, G or any combination thereof
can theoretically occur. DSM, per AISI S100-12 considers the strength as the minimum of L-G
(PnL) and D (PnD). If DSM predicts L-G controls (PnL<PnD) then the PFE results are plotted against
the DSM local curve, as in Figure 5a. If distortional buckling is predicted to occur, per existing
DSM rules (PnD<PnL) then PFE are plotted against the distortional curve, as in Figure 5b. The results
indicate (1) distortional buckling rarely is predicted to control for longer unbraced members, (2)
significant scatter exists in the local-global strength prediction when visualized as a function of
local slenderness alone.

Figure 5. Comparison between DSM and AHSS member results under global “free” boundary conditions of Figure
2c for specimens predicted as (a) local-global buckling controlled, and (b) distortional buckling controlled.

To examine this second point regarding visualization of the predictions as a function of local
slenderness, the PFE results that are predicted to be controlled by L-G interaction, are instead
plotted as a function of global slenderness in Figure 6a. The results indicate the expected overall
trend against global slenderness and the necessity to consider L-G interaction as the strength falls
below the global strength prediction. In DSM L-G interaction is a function of the local slenderness
(lL=(Pne/PcrL)0.5) to see how this impacts the column strength the reduced global strength for
different values of lL are provided. The selected values of lL include the mean +/- a standard
deviation for the studied values of lL as depicted in Figure 5a and in the histogram of lL itself in
Figure 6b. From this we can conclude that the large scatter observed in Figure 5a is somewhat
misleading as it is normalized to Pne, which is often a small capacity. The overall agreement with
the L-G data is better shown against global slenderness as in Figure 6a. Nonetheless the long
column results suggest that further refinement may be needed. In particular, D-G interaction is
ignored, to what extent might this be influencing the scatter in the results? The results on columns
which may fail in only L or D (Figure 4) indicate a large number of high yield stress AHSS sections
fail in D – why would it be expected that essentially all of these would fail in L-G interaction for
longer columns. Consistent with previous research findings of others, current DSM provisions may
need to be revisited for D-G interaction, particularly for very high strength steel shapes, as is
common with AHSS.

6

45
40
35

Frequency

30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

λL

Figure 6. (a) Predicted strength as a function of global slenderness for Figure 5a specimens including reduced curves
depending on local slenderness and (b) distribution of local slenderness in studied members

Significant work remains, even for the member-based FE collapse studies pursued herein. Prepeak stiffness, post-peak response, local strain demands, impact of residual stresses and strains,
impact of imperfection magnitude and distribution, examination of different loading actions
including combined actions, detailed examination of existing and new options for considering
interaction buckling in the strength prediction, reliability studies, and consideration of other crosssections to name a few. Nonetheless, this initial study indicates that cold-formed steel members
formed from AHSS do not radically depart from expected strengths, but additional studies may
needed to fine tune existing design specifications when very high strength AHSS members are
employed.
4. Conclusions
An initial examination of existing design strength predictions for cold-formed steel compression
members formed from advanced high strength steel (AHSS) grades indicates that modest changes
in the strength prediction methods will likely be needed if AHSS is adopted for steel construction.
For members failing in isolated local or distortional buckling existing strength predictions from
the Direct Strength Method in AISI S100-12 appear adequate. For longer members local-global
interaction does not appear sufficient to accurately capture the strength and distortional-global
interaction deserves further investigation. The finding is limited to the context of the study, which
considers 5 AHSS grades, 40 commercially available cold-formed steel lipped channel crosssections, at one member length, in compression, across a variety of cross-section boundary
conditions. The results are arrived at through geometric and material nonlinear collapse shell finite
element simulations performed in ABAQUS. Additional work is needed to explore additional
loading actions, examine the strain demands inherent in the new sections, consider additional
manufacturing impacts such as residual stresses and strains, and delve more deeply into buckling
mode interaction issues for these members.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the American Iron and Steel Institute for partial support of this
work. All findings and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the
views of the sponsor.

7

References
Schafer, B.W. (2002). “Local, Distortional, and Euler Buckling in Thin-walled Columns.”
Journal of Structural Engineering, 128 (3) 289-299.
Schafer, B.W. (2008). “Review: The Direct Strength Method of cold-formed steel member
design.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 64 (7) 766-778.
Foroughi, H., et al. (2014). “Analysis and design of thin metallic shell structural memberscurrent practice and future research needs.” Proc. of Annual Stability Conference Structural
Stability Research Council, Toronto, Canada.
Yap, D. C. Y., Hancock. G.J. (2008). “Experimental Study of Complex High-Strength ColdFormed Cross-Shaped Steel Section.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 134 (8) 1322-1333.
Yap, D. C. Y., Hancock. G.J. (2011). “Experimental Study of High-Strength Cold-Formed
Stiffened-Web C-Sections in Compression.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 137 (2) 162-172.
Dinis, P. B., D. Camotim, E. M. Batista, and E. Santos. (2011). “Local / Distortional / Global
Mode Coupling in Fixed Lipped Channel Columns: Behaviour and Strength.” Advanced Steel
Construction 7 (1 SPEC. ISSUE): 113-130.
Camotim, D. and P. B. Dinis. (2011). “Coupled Instabilities with Distortional Buckling in ColdFormed Steel Lipped Channel Columns.” Thin-Walled Structures, 49 (5) 562-575.
Silvestre, N., D. Camotim, and P. B. Dinis. (2012). “Post-Buckling Behaviour and Direct
Strength Design of Lipped Channel Columns Experiencing local/distortional Interaction.”
Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 73 12-30.
Young, B., N. Silvestre, and D. Camotim. (2013). “Cold-Formed Steel Lipped Channel Columns
Influenced by Local-Distortional Interaction: Strength and DSM Design.” Journal of Structural
Engineering, 139 (6) 1059-1074.
Dinis, P. B., B. Young, and D. Camotim. (2014). “Strength, Interactive Failure and Design of
Web-Stiffened Lipped Channel Columns Exhibiting Distortional Buckling.” Thin-Walled
Structures, 81 195-209.
Dinis, P. B., D. Camotim, E. M. Batista, and E. Santos. (2011). “Local / Distortional / Global
Mode Coupling in Fixed Lipped Channel Columns: Behaviour and Strength.” Advanced Steel
Construction 7 (1 SPEC. ISSUE): 113-130.
Martins, A. D., P. B. Dinis, and D. Camotim. (2016). “On the Influence of Local-Distortional
Interaction in the Behaviour and Design of Cold-Formed Steel Web-Stiffened Lipped Channel
Columns.” Thin-Walled Structures, 101 181-204.

8

Martins, A. D., P. B. Dinis, D. Camotim, and P. Providência. (2015). “On the Relevance of
Local-Distortional Interaction Effects in the Behaviour and Design of Cold-Formed Steel
Columns. ” Computers and Structures, 160 57-89.
Schafer, B.W., Li, Z., Moen, C.D. (2010). “Computational modeling of cold-formed steel.” Thinwalled Structures, 48 (10-11) 752-762.
Zeinoddini, V. M., and B. W. Schafer. (2012) "Simulation of geometric imperfections in coldformed steel members using spectral representation approach.” Thin-Walled Structures, 60 105117.

9

