Dissertation
zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. rer. nat.)
des Fachbereics Mathematik/Informatik
der Universität Osnabrück
2016

UNIVERSITÄT
OSNABRÜCK

T HE S YMMETRIC S IGNATURE

vorgelegt von

Alessio Caminata

Betreuer
Prof. Dr. Holger

Brenner

To Elisa,
my love and inspiration.

Contents
Introduction
7
Summary of the thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1. Preliminaries and definitions
1.1. Krull-Remak-Schmidt property and ranks
1.1.1. Rank and free rank . . . . . . . . . .
1.2. Syzygies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2.1. Syzygies over local rings . . . . . . .
1.3. Reflexive modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.4. Depth and Serre’s conditions . . . . . . . .
1.5. Maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules . . . .
1.5.1. Geometry of MCM modules . . . . .

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

17
17
19
21
22
22
26
30
34

2. Signatures
2.1. F-signature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1.1. F-signature in characteristic zero .
2.2. Symmetric signature . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2.1. Differential symmetric signature .

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

37
37
42
43
46

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

49
51
55
59
62
64
67
72
74

.
.
.
.

79
80
84
86
86

3. Quotient Singularites
3.1. Representation theory of finite groups .
3.2. Character theory . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3. Skew group ring . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4. The Auslander correspondence . . . . .
3.4.1. The functor F . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.2. The functor G . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.3. The Auslander functor . . . . . .
3.5. Quotient singularities . . . . . . . . . .

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities
4.1. Auslander functor and symmetric powers .
4.2. Kleinian singularities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.1. The singularity A n−1 . . . . . . . . .
4.2.2. The singularity D n+2 . . . . . . . . .

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

5

Contents
4.2.3. The singularity E 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.4. The singularity E 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.5. The singularity E 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.6. Kleinian singularities over arbitrary fields . . . . . . . . .
4.3. The second syzygy of the residue field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.3.1. Computation of Syz2R (k) for the singularity A n−1 . . . . .
4.3.2. Computation of Syz2R (k) for the singularity D n+2 . . . . .
4.4. Symmetric signature of Kleinian singularities . . . . . . . . . . .
4.4.1. Differential symmetric signature of Kleinian singularities
4.5. Symmetric signature of cyclic quotient singularites . . . . . . . .
5. Symmetric signature of cones over elliptic curves
5.1. Vector bundles over curves . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1.1. Syzygies of vector bundles . . . . . . . .
5.1.2. Vector bundles over elliptic curves . . .
5.2. Symmetric signature of elliptic curves . . . . .
5.2.1. Strategy 1: Symq as subbundle of T q .
5.2.2. Strategy 2: an upper bound for frkOY (1)

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

87
88
89
90
92
95
96
98
102
102

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

109
110
113
115
119
121
123

A. Macaulay2 computations
127
A.0.3. Computation of Syz2R (k) for the singularity E 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
A.0.4. Computation of Syz2R (k) for the singularity E 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
A.0.5. Computation of Syz2R (k) for the singularity E 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
Bibliography

6

133

Introduction
In principle, you can define
everything.
Gerd Faltings

A recurring procedure used in algebraic geometry and commutative algebra, and more
in general in Mathematics, to understand a rather complicated object is to attach to it a
number, a numerical invariant. This invariant should capture the properties we want to
investigate, so isomorphic objects must have the same numerical invariant, and it should
be relatively easy to compute, thus this is not a strict condition. Classical examples in
algebraic geometry are the dimension of an algebraic variety or the genus of an algebraic
curve.
Another important and classical example is the Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity. Given a
local ring (R, m) of dimension d (one can think of it as the ring of a point of an algebraic
variety), we can associate to it the following number
e(R) := lim

d ! · l R (R/mn+1 )

n→+∞

nd

,

which is always a positive integer and is called the Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity of R. This
is an algebraic invariant which can be interpreted as a measure of the singularity of the
point in the variety: the bigger the multiplicity is, the more complicated the singularity.
Moreover one has that e(R) = 1 if and only if the ring is regular, that is the point is smooth.
The Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity is quite easy to compute in general, there exist algorithms that have been implemented on computer algebra softwares such as Macaulay2
[GS]. As a drawback, this multiplicity is not a fine invariant and is not able to distinguish
different types of singularities. For example, the two-dimensional rings kx, y, z/(x 2 +
y 3 + z 5 ) and kx, y, z/(x 2 + y 3 + z 7 ) have both multiplicity 2, but they have very different
algebraic properties, the first one being a unique factorization domain, the latter not.
If we work over a field of prime characteristic p, we can use the Frobenius homomorphism given by F (r ) = r p and build finer invariants to understand the singularities of
the ring. A pioneer in this study was Kunz [Kun69]. In 1969 he introduced the function
q 7→ l R (R/m[q] ) and the limit
e H K (R) := lim

q→+∞

l R (R/m[q] )
qd

,

7

Introduction
which are now known as Hilbert-Kunz function and Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity respectively. The difference with the classical setting is that q = p e varies only among powers of
the characteristic and m[q] is the Frobenius power of the ideal, generated by all the q-th
powers of elements of m.
In 1983, Monsky [Mon83] proved that the limit defining e H K (R) always exists and extended the definition to R-modules in general. In 2000, Watanabe and Yoshida [WY00]
proved that e H K (R) = 1 if and only if the ring is regular. So, the Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity
detects regularity as the classical Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity does. Moreover, it is deeply
connected with the theory of tight closure and F-singularities in prime characteristic (see
for example the book of Huneke [Hun96] and the survey article of Schwede and Tucker
[ST12]). On the other hand, the Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity is in general much more difficult to compute than the Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity, and is not necessarily an integer,
and not even a rational number, as shown by Brenner [Bre13].
The main motivation for this thesis comes from a more recent invariant of prime characteristic rings: the F-signature. This was introduced in 2002 by Huneke and Leuschke
[HL02], who continued the ideas of Smith and Van den Bergh [SVB96] of focusing on the
splitting properties of the Frobenius homomorphism.
Consider (R, m, k) a d -dimensional reduced Noetherian local ring of prime characteristic p which is F-finite, and with algebraically closed residue field k. For every e ∈ N,
let q = p e and let eR be the R-module which is equal to R as abelian group and has left
e
multiplication twisted via Frobenius, that is r ◦ s := r p s. We decompose it as
e

R = R aq ⊕ M q ,

where the module M q has no free direct summands. The limit
s(R) := lim

e→+∞

aq
qd

is called F-signature of R. The number a q is also called the free rank of eR and denoted
by frkR (eR), while if R is a domain, one has that q d = rankR (eR), the usual rank of an
R-module.
Huneke and Leuschke [HL02] proved that the limit defining the F-signature exists assuming that R is Gorenstein. Then, other authors showed the existence in some other
cases (see e.g. Yao [Yao05] for rings of finite F-representation type, or Singh [Sin05] for
affine semigroup rings). Finally, in 2012 Tucker [Tuc12] proved that the F-signature exists
for every reduced F-finite Noetherian local ring.
It is worth mentioning that, almost at the same time of Huneke and Leuschke, Watanabe and Yoshida [WY04] introduced a similar notion, called minimal relative HilbertKunz multiplicity. Then, Yao [Yao06] proved it actually coincides with the F-signature.
The F-signature is a real number between 0 and 1 and provides delicate information about the singularities of R. Two principal results in this direction are the fact that

8

Introduction
s(R) = 1 if and only if the ring is regular, and that s(R) > 0 if and only if R is strongly Fregular. The first one is a consequence of the analogous result of Watanabe and Yoshida
[WY00] for the Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity, and the second one was proved by Aberbach
and Leuschke [AL03]. There are other results which justify the statement that F-signature
measures singularities. In general, the closer to 1 the F-signature is, the nicer the singularity.
The F-signature is an intrinsic concept of rings of prime characteristic, but it would be
profitable to have an analogous invariant which is independent of the characteristic and
could be used to study singularities also in characteristic zero. This problem is actually
the main motivation of this thesis, and led us to the definition of the symmetric signature.
A first natural attempt to define a characteristic zero version of the F-signature is perhaps the following. If R is a reduced Z-algebra such that SpecR → SpecZ is dominant,
then for every prime number p we consider its reduction mod p, R p := R ⊗Z (Z/p Z), and
compute the F-signature s(R p ). One may ask whether the limit
lim s(R p )

p→+∞

exists, and use this limit to define a characteristic 0 version of the F-signature.
Unfortunately, it is difficult to find an appropriate meaning and compute the previous
limit, or even determine whether it exists at all. In fact, if p 1 and p 2 are two distinct
prime numbers, the two Frobenius homomorphisms F p 1 : R p 1 → R p 1 and F p 2 : R p 2 → R p 2
are quite different in general, and difficult to compare. For example, if R is a domain then
the rank of eR p 1 and the rank of eR p 2 are different, the first one being p 1e and the second
one p 2e .
For our definition of symmetric signature, we choose a different approach. We replace
the module eR with another module S q (here q is simply a natural number), which is
defined without using the Frobenius homomorphism or other properties of prime characteristic rings. This approach has the clear advantage that in a relative situation, when
R is a reduced Z-algebra, we can give a meaning to the limit limp→+∞ s(R p ). The exisq
tence of this limit is not clear also in this case, but at least now the modules S p over the
fibers R p are specializations of the same module S q over R.
Consider a Noetherian local d-dimensional domain (R, m, k), with algebraically closed
residue field k and consider SyzdR (k), the top-dimensional syzygy module of k. For every
¡
¢∗∗
q
natural number q we define S q := SymR (SyzdR (k)) , where (−)∗ denotes the functor
HomR (−, R). We decompose the last module as
S q = R aq ⊕ M q ,
with the module M q containing no free direct summands, so that a q = frkR S q . For ease
of notation we fix also b q := rankR S q , and we introduce the following (Definition 2.2.1).

9

Introduction
Definition. The real number
PN

q=0 a q

s σ (R) := lim PN
N →+∞

q=0 b q

is called symmetric signature of R, provided the limit exists.
In our construction we looked at two important properties of the module eR which we
would like to keep. First, if the ring R is Cohen-Macaulay then eR is a maximal CohenMacaulay module. The second fact is an outstanding result of Kunz, which states that eR
is a free module (for all or for some e ∈ N) if and only if R is a regular ring.
These properties are shared also by the top dimensional syzygy module of the residue
field SyzdR (k), which is always maximal Cohen-Macaulay, and is R-free if and only if the
ring R is regular. These are consequences of the Depth Lemma (Lemma 1.4.9), of a famous result of Auslander, Buchsbaum, and Serre (Theorem 1.4.6), and of the AuslanderBuchsbaum formula (Theorem 1.4.3). In order to obtain an asymptotic behaviour, we
apply the symmetric powers to SyzdR (k) and we take reflexive hull, obtaining the module
S q . After Auslander, who introduced the reflexive tensor product, we call the functor
q
SymR (−)∗∗ reflexive symmetric powers.
Another interesting possibility would be to replace the module SyzdR (k) with the module Ω∗∗
of Zariski differentials of R over k, and then applying again reflexive symmetric
R/k
powers. We consider also this case and we call the corresponding limit differential symmetric signature (Definition 2.2.15), but in most parts of the thesis we will rather concentrate on the symmetric signature defined with SyzdR (k).
As a fundamental test to sustain our definition of symmetric signature we focus on two
important classes of examples: two-dimensional quotient singularities and coordinate
rings of plane elliptic curves.
A two-dimensional quotient singularity R over a field k is the invariant ring under
the linear action of a finite small group G ⊆ GL(2, k) on a power series ring S = ku, v.
Watanabe and Yoshida [WY04] proved that the F-signature of a quotient singularity R
1
over a field of prime characteristic k is equal to |G|
, provided that the characteristic of k
does not divide the order of the group.
We focus on two particular classes of quotient singularities R = ku, vG , with the characteristic of k not dividing the order of G.
1. Kleinian quotient singularities or ADE singularities, that is when G ⊆ SL(2, k).
2. Cyclic quotient singularities, that is when G is a cyclic subgroup of GL(2, k).
We compute the symmetric signature for these two classes of rings.
The methods we use to handle these cases live at the intersection of homological algebra and representation theory. In particular, our main tool is the so-called Auslander
correspondence (Theorem 3.5.10). This states that under certain hypothesis there is a one
to one correspondence between irreducible k-representations of G and indecomposable

10

Introduction
maximal Cohen-Macaulay R-modules. Moreover, this correspondence is functorial, that
is there exists a functor A , called Auslander functor, which sends every k-representation
V to the maximal Cohen-Macaulay module A (V ) := (S ⊗k V )G .
The Auslander correspondence will be the main object of study of Section 3.4, where
we will recall its proof and generalize it to the case where the ring S is a normal ndimensional domain, but not necessarily a power series ring.
Then, we will prove the following two fundamental results (Theorem 4.1.8 and Corollary 4.3.6), which will allow us to translate the problem of computing the symmetric signature of R into a problem of representation theory of finite groups.
Theorem. The Auslander functor A commutes with reflexive symmetric powers, that is
for every k-representation V of G we have
¡
¢ ¡
¢∗∗
q
q
A Symk (V ) ∼
.
= SymR (A (V ))
q

q

Here, SymR (−) denotes the q-th symmetric power of an R-module, and Symk (V ) is
the q-th symmetric power of the representation V , which is canonical isomorphic to its
double dual.
Theorem. Let R = S G be a two-dimensional Kleinian singularity, and let V1 be the twodimensional fundamental representation which defines the action of G on S. Then, the
second syzygy module of the residue field k is isomorphic to the image of V1 via Auslander
functor, that is
Syz2R (k) ∼
= A (V1 ).
The second theorem extends a result of Yoshino and Kawamoto [YK88], who proved
that in this situation A (V1 ) is isomorphic to the third syzygy of the residue field, Syz3R (k).
As a consequence of the previous two theorems it turns out that for a two-dimensional
q
Kleinian singularity the rank of S q is just the dimension of the representation Symk (V1 ),
that is q + 1, and the free rank of S q is equal to the multiplicity of the trivial represenq
tation into Symk (V1 ). This multiplicity can be more easily computed using tools from
representation theory of finite groups, such as character theory. Thus, we obtain the following result.
Theorem. Let R = S G be a Kleinian singularity over an algebraically closed field k such
that chark does not divide the order of G. Then the symmetric signature of R is
s σ (R) =

1
.
|G|

The same result is obtained also for the differential symmetric signature (Theorem
4.4.11).
For cyclic quotient singularities the situation is a little bit more complicated, since
Syz2R (k) is not necessarily isomorphic to A (V1 ), and it does not even have rank 2 in general. However it is a maximal Cohen-Macaulay module, so it is isomorphic to the image

11

Introduction
via Auslander functor A of a k-representation of G. We do not determine explicitly which
representation it is, but we prove it is a faithful representation (Lemma 4.5.5). Then, using again techniques from representation theory we are able to prove the following result,
which is obtained in collaboration with Lukas Katthän.
Theorem. Let R = S G be a cyclic singularity over an algebraically closed field k such that
chark does not divide the order of G. Then the symmetric signature of R is
s σ (R) =

1
.
|G|

The second class of examples we are interested in are coordinate rings of plane projective elliptic curves over an algebraically closed field k, that is R = k[x, y, z]/( f ) with
f a homogeneous non-singular polynomial of degree 3. If k has prime characteristic,
then R is not strongly F-regular, so by the result of Aberbach and Leuschke [AL03] the
F-signature of R is 0. We would like to prove that also the symmetric signature of R is 0.
The methods we use to handle this case are geometric. We use the correspondence
between graded MCM R-modules and vector bundles over the smooth projective curve
Y = ProjR, and we translate the problem of computing s σ (R) into an analogous problem
in the category VB(Y ) of vector bundles over Y . The main advantage of this approach
is that over an elliptic curve Y the structure of the category VB(Y ) has been clarified by
Atiyah [Ati57]. He gave a description of the indecomposable vector bundles on Y , and
their behaviour under the tensor product operation.
Using Atiyah’s classification we are able to prove the desired result for the differential
symmetric signature defined with Ω∗∗
(Theorem 5.2.1).
R/k
Theorem. Let Y be a plane elliptic curve over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic ≥ 5 with coordinate ring R. Then the differential symmetric signature of R is s d σ (R) = 0.
Unfortunately we are not able at the moment to obtain the same result for the symmetric signature. However we present two strategies that allow us to get partial results
and a better understanding of the decomposition of the module S q involved in the definition of symmetric signature. In particular, we prove that over the field of the complex
numbers s σ (R) ≤ 21 , provided the limit exists (Corollary 5.2.6).

Summary of the thesis
In the first chapter we present and discuss some classical notions in commutative algebra. The contents of this chapter are not new, on the contrary they are important and
established results that are necessary to define and understand the symmetric signature.
In particular, in Section 1.1 we present the definition and examples of Krull-Schmidt categories. Roughly speaking, these are the categories, where each object can be uniquely

12

Introduction
decomposed as a direct sum of indecomposable objects. In Section 1.2 we give the definition of a syzygy of a module over a Noetherian commutative ring, and in the particular
case of a local Noetherian ring. Then, in Section 1.3 we give a small survey on reflexive
modules. In Section 1.4 we present some very important results in commutative algebra,
which will appear often throughout the thesis. These are for example the AuslanderBuchsbaum formula (Theorem 1.4.3) and the Depth Lemma (Lemma 1.4.9). Finally, in
Section 1.5 we introduce the class of maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules and present
some of their most important properties.
Chapter 2 is dedicated to the F-signature and the symmetric signature. In Section 2.1
we present a short survey on F-signature and its properties. We give no proofs, but rather
we focus on the examples and ideas that we consider more significant to motivate our
choice to define the symmetric signature. This will be defined in Section 2.2, together
with its variant, the differential symmetric signature. In this section we will present also
some easy results and observations that follow almost directly from our definition.
The third chapter is dedicated to quotient singularities and to the Auslander correspondence. We give a short review of basic notions of representation theory of finite
groups (Section 3.1), Brauer characters (Section 3.2), and skew-group ring (Section 3.3).
Then, we will focus on the Auslander correspondence and we will present a proof (Section 3.4). Our proof follows mainly the original ideas of Auslander [Aus86b] (see also
[Yos90], [LW12], and [IT13]), but it is more general, since we do not assume that the ring
S where the finite group acts on is regular and two-dimensional. Moreover, we present an
alternative geometric proof of certain well-established facts (e.g. Lemma 3.4.11). Finally,
in Section 3.5 we recall the main properties of quotient singularities, and we provide
some classical examples of the Auslander correspondence applied to this setting.
Chapter 4 contains some of the main results of this thesis. We prove here that the
Auslander functor commutes with reflexive symmetric powers (Section 4.1), and that the
second syzygy of the residue field of a Kleinian singularity is isomorphic to the fundamental module of Auslander theory (Section 4.3). In Section 4.4 we compute the symmetric signature of the Kleinian singularities, and in Section 4.5 we compute the symmetric signature of a two-dimensional cyclic singularity. The differential variant is also
considered and computed here.
In the last chapter we present some partial results concerning the symmetric signature
of the coordinate ring of a plane elliptic curve over an algebraically closed field. In Section 5.1 we give a short review of the methods we use to attack this problem. We recall the
definition and the basic properties of vector bundles over a smooth projective curve, and
then we focus on Atiyah’s classification of vector bundles over an elliptic curve (Section
5.1.2). In Section 5.2 we prove that the differential symmetric signature of the coordinate
ring of a plane elliptic curve is 0 (Theorem 5.2.1), and we prove that over C the symmetric
signature, if it exists, is at most 12 (Corollary 5.2.6). Finally, in Section 5.2.1 and Section
5.2.2 we present two possible strategies that hopefully may be completed to prove that
the symmetric signature is 0 in this case.

13

Introduction

Acknowledgements
First of all, I want to thank my advisor Holger Brenner. He has guided me with patience
and experience to reach the results contained in this thesis. Without his help and his
friendly approach this would have not been possible.
I would like to thank Winfried Bruns for his kindness and humanity. He has been always helpful and very nice to me and my girlfriend Elisa. He has done a lot to make my
stay in Osnabrück much more confortable.
During these four years in Osnabrück, I have been in the middle of two generations of
Ph.D. students and post docs. So I have been lucky enough to get to know, and benefit
from the presence of both the old and the new generation. Let me thank both for the
stimulating conversations and for all the fun we had. Their presence has made the math
department in Osnabrück a warm and familiar working place. Among them, I thank
Lukas Katthän, whom I had the pleasure to work with, and I thank Davide Alberelli for
his great help with LATEX and for all the stylistic advices.
During my Ph.D. studies I attended many conferences, workshops, and schools around
the world, where I met a lot of other young mathematicians. I shared many ideas with
them, and part of my growing as a mathematician and as a man is due to these fruitful
and frequent conversations. I am grateful to them for this reason, and I am looking forward to have this possibility again. In particular, I want to thank Yusuke Nakajima for all
discussions about Auslander theory that we had in Tateyama, Barcelona, and during his
visit in Osnabrück. I learned a lot from him, and I hope to meet him again in the future,
and continue our conversation.
I want to thank Alberto Fernandez Boix for suggesting me the notation s σ (−) for the
symmetric signature.
I want to thank my parents, Francesco and Nicoletta, and my sister Ilaria for all the
support that they gave me during these years. It was not easy for me to be distant from
my family, but they did everything they could to fill this gap and make me feel always
serene.
The greatest thanks of all goes to my girlfriend Elisa. She has been by my side during
all my Ph.D. studies, always supporting me and sustaining my choices, even if this was
sometimes not easy for her. Words cannot express how grateful I am to her, but I am sure
she knows.
Finally, even if he will probabily never read these lines, I want to thank David Robert
Jones. His amazing work for more than fourty years has inspired me a lot during the
writing of this thesis.

14

Introduction

Notation
In this thesis we will use notations according mainly to the following textbooks.
1. For what concerns commutative algebra, we refer to the books of Atiyah and Macdonald [AMD69], and Bruns and Herzog [BH98].
2. For what concerns algebraic geometry, we refer to the books of Hartshorne [Har77],
and Le Potier [LeP97].
3. For what concerns representation theory, we refer to the books of Fulton and Harris [FH91], and Feit [Fei82], and the notes of Webb [Web14].
In particular, we will adopt the following conventions.
• When we say that R is a ring, we always mean a non-zero, associative, unitary ring.
And by homomorphism of rings f : R → S, we always assume that f (1R ) = 1S .
• In almost all thesis, with the exception of some parts of Chapter 1 and Chapter 3,
our rings will be also Noetherian and commutative.
• We denote by N the set of natural numbers including 0, that is N = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, . . . }.
• We denote by Z the set of integer numbers, by Q the set of rational numbers, and
by C the set of complex numbers.
• An ideal I of a ring R will be always different from R.
• We denote by (R, m, k) or by (R, m) a local ring, that is a commutative unitary ring
with a unique maximal ideal m, where k = R/m.
• Given a commutative ring R, an R-module M and a multiplicative system S ⊆ R,
we will denote by S −1 M the localization of M at S. If p is a prime ideal of R, we will
write M p instead of (R \ p)−1 M .
• We say that a commutative ring R is graded if it is N-graded, that is if there is a
L
decomposition R = i ∈N R i such that each R i is an R 0 -module and R i R j ⊆ R i + j .
L
The irrelevant ideal of R is R + := i >0 R i . An element x of R has degree i if x ∈ R i .
Therefore 0 has degree i for all i ∈ N.
• We say that an algebra R is standard graded over a field k if R is graded, R 0 = k, and
R is generated by finitely many elements of degree 1, i.e. R = k[R 1 ].
• The spectrum of a commutative ring R is the topological space
SpecR := {p ⊆ R : p is a prime ideal}
intended with the Zariski topology.
• The projective spectrum of a commutative graded ring R is the topological space
ProjR := {p ⊆ R : p is a homogeneous prime ideal not containing R + }
intended with the Zariski topology.
Further references and notations will be explained throughout the thesis.

15

1. Preliminaries and definitions
I don’t know where I’m going from
here, but I promise it won’t be boring.
David Bowie

The main goal of this chapter is to present and discuss the notions and the results
which are necessary to define and understand the symmetric signature. All theorems in
this chapter are classical and well-known, so we skip proofs and we refer to appropriate
sources. We reserve to give a proof in two cases: if we did not find a suitable reference or
if we think that the proof is particularly enlightening to understand the key ideas.
Our main references for this chapter are the following: the book of Bruns and Herzog
[BH98] for Section 1.2 on syzygies and Section 1.4 on depth and Serre’s conditions, the
books of Leuschke and Wiegand [LW12], and Yoshino [Yos90] for Section 1.1 on KrullSchmidt categories and ranks, and Section 1.5 on maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules,
and the book of Lam [Lam98] for Section 1.3 on reflexive modules. Other important references used will be outlined throughout the presentation.

1.1. Krull-Remak-Schmidt property and ranks
The name Krull-Remak-Schmidt property (KRS property, for short) refers to the socalled Krull-Remak-Schmidt Theorem. Roughly speaking, this states that a group, satisfying certain finiteness conditions, can be uniquely written as a finite direct product of
indecomposable subgroups. It was first proved by Wedderburn [Wed09], and then generalized and extended by Remak [Rem11], Schmidt [Sch13], and Krull [Kru25]. The name
Krull-Remak-Schmidt Theorem is nowadays used for results that concern a unique decomposition also in settings different from group theory, such as modules over Artinian
and Noetherian rings and coherent sheaves.
It appears to us, that the KRS property is better explained using the language of category theory. We will use the terminology of Mac Lane’s book [Mac71] and we assume that
the reader is familiar with the concept of an abelian category. This is an additive category
in which every map has a kernel and a cokernel, and in which every monomorphism (respectively epimorphism) is a kernel (respectively cokernel).
Fundamental examples of abelian categories are categories of modules over rings. We
introduce now the notation for two of those categories. Even if we will work mainly with

17

1. Preliminaries and definitions
commutative rings, it is useful to define these categories also in the non-commutative
setting.
Definition 1.1.1. Let R be a ring, we denote by mod(R) the category whose objects are
finitely generated left modules and whose morphisms are R-linear maps between them.
The category proj(R) is the full subcategory of mod(R) consisting of projective finitely
generated left R-modules.
Given two objects X and Y in an abelian category C , there exists a unique object X ⊕Y
in C , called the direct sum of X and Y . This motivates the following definitions.
Definition 1.1.2. Let X be a non-zero object of C . X is called indecomposable if X =
X 1 ⊕ X 2 implies X 1 = 0 or X 2 = 0. X is called simple if X 1 ⊆ X implies X 1 = 0 or X 1 = X .
Clearly, simple objects are indecomposable, but the converse is in general not true.
Example 1.1.3. We consider the category mod(Z) of Z-modules. The simple objects of
mod(Z) are the cyclic modules Z/p Z of prime order. The module Z is indecomposable,
but is not simple.
Definition 1.1.4. Let X be an object of an abelian category C . We denote by Add(X )
the full subcategory consisting of all finite direct sums of copies of X and their direct
summands.
The category Add(X ) is the smallest additive subcategory of C which contains X and
is closed under taking direct summands.
Definition 1.1.5. An additive category C is said to be a Krull-Schmidt category or to have
the KRS property if every object of C decomposes into a finite direct sum of objects having local endomorphism rings.
Notice that the endomorphism ring End(X ) of an object X in C may be non-commutative.
One says that End(X ) is local if the sum of non-units in End(X ) is a non-unit.
In Krull-Schmidt categories we have an analogue of the Krull-Remak-Schmidt Theorem.
Theorem 1.1.6 (Krull-Remak-Schmidt). Let C be a Krull-Schmidt category, then the following facts hold.
1) An object X is indecomposable if and only if End(X ) is local.
2) Every object is isomorphic to a finite direct sum of indecomposable objects.
3) If X is an object of C and there are two decompositions
X 1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ X r = X = Y1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ Y s
into indecomposable objects, then r = s and there exists a permutation π such that
Xi ∼
= Yπ(i ) for i = 1, . . . , r .

18

1.1. Krull-Remak-Schmidt property and ranks
Remark 1.1.7. Let R be a commutative local ring such that mod(R) has the KRS property.
Then the endomorphism ring EndR (R) ∼
= R is local, so R is an indecomposable object in
mod(R).
Our main interest is for categories of modules over some ring R, but the KRS property
may fail in these categories, even if the ring is regular.
Example 1.1.8. The category mod(Z) does not have the KRS property. Although every
finitely generated Z-module is a direct sum of indecomposable objects, the indecomposable module Z does not have a local endomorphism ring.
Example 1.1.9 (Leuschke-Wiegand [LW12]). Let R = k[x, y], m = (x, y) and n = (x − 1, y).
We have m + n = R, so we get a short exact sequence
0 → m ∩ n → m ⊕ n → R → 0.
Since R is projective, the sequence splits, so m ⊕ n ∼
= R ⊕ (m ∩ n). Neither m nor n is isomorphic to R, therefore the category mod(R) is not KRS.
We present now some examples of Krull-Schmidt categories without proofs. If not
otherwise stated, the reader should consult the book of Leuschke and Wiegand [LW12,
Chapter 1] or the notes of Krause [Kra14] for proofs and further details.
Theorem 1.1.10. Let R be a commutative ring, then the following facts hold.
1) If R is Artinian, then mod(R) has the KRS property.
2) If R is local and complete, then mod(R) has the KRS property.
Remark 1.1.11. The condition complete in part 2) of Theorem 1.1.10 could be replaced
with Henselian and the statement remains true. We recall that by Hensel’s lemma complete local rings are Henselian.
Theorem 1.1.12 (Atiyah [Ati56]). Let (X , O X ) be a complete algebraic variety over an algebraically closed field. Then the KRS property holds for the category Coh(X ) of coherent
O X -modules. Moreover if X is connected then KRS holds also for the category VB(X ) of
vector bundles over X .

1.1.1. Rank and free rank
Let R be a commutative ring, and let S be the multiplicative system consisting of the
non-zero-divisors of R. If R is reduced, then S is the complement of the union of the
minimal primes of R. The total ring of fractions of R is the ring Q(R) := S −1 R.
Definition 1.1.13. Let M be an R-module, we say that M has rank, if the module S −1 M
is a free Q(R)-module. In this case we define
rankR M := rankQ(R) S −1 M .

19

1. Preliminaries and definitions
Remark 1.1.14. If R is a domain, then S = R \ {0} and Q(R) is a field. So every finitely
generated R-module has rank.
Definition 1.1.15. Let M be a finitely generated R-module. We define the free rank of M
as
frkR (M ) := max{n : ∃ a split surjection ϕ : M  R n }.
If the module M has finite rank, we can write it as M ∼
= R frkR (M ) ⊕ N , where the module
N has no free direct R-summands. It follows that in general
frkR M ≤ rankR M .
Example 1.1.16. Let M be a finite free R-module, then M has rank and rankR M = frkR M .
Example 1.1.17. Let R be a principal ideal domain, then every finitely generated Rmodule M can be decomposed as M = R n ⊕T (M ), where T (M ) is the torsion sub-module
of M . It follows that n = frkR M = rankR M .
Remark 1.1.18. Let R be a domain and let C be a full subcategory of mod(R), such that
C has the KRS property. Then for every object M of C we have a unique decomposition
into indecomposable objects
⊕n 1

M = M1
for some integers n i . Then, rankR M =

P

i

⊕n r

⊕ · · · ⊕ Mr

,

n i rankR M i .

When R is a graded commutative ring, it is convenient to introduce a graded version
of the free rank. We recall that by graded ring we always mean N-graded ring.
Definition 1.1.19. Let R be a graded ring and let M be a finitely generated graded Rmodule. We define the graded free rank of M as
gr

frkR (M ) := max{n : ∃ a homogeneous of degree 0 split surjection ϕ : M  F,
with F free graded R-module of rank n}.
The main reason to introduce this definition is that for a graded ring R the category
mod(R) is rarely a Krull-Schmidt category, even if R is complete or regular (see Example
1.1.9). To hope to recover a unique decomposition of an R-module into indecomposable
objects, one should rather work with the category modZ (R) of finitely generated graded
R-modules, whose maps are R-linear homomorphisms of degree 0. Thus, Definition
1.1.19 looks more natural in this category.
One should remind that in modZ (R) two R-modules R(a) and R(b) with a 6= b are not
isomorphic. However, all modules of the form R(a) for some integer a contribute to the
graded free rank part of the module. For example, the modules R(1) ⊕ R(−2) and R 2 are

20

1.2. Syzygies
two non-isomorphic graded R-modules of free rank 2. Therefore the free R-module F of
Definition 1.1.19 can be uniquely written as
F=

n
M

R(a i ),

i =1

for some integers a i .
Finally, we point out that for a finitely generated graded module M over a graded ring
R, the following inequality holds
gr

frkR M ≤ frkR M .

1.2. Syzygies
We consider a Noetherian ring R and a left R-module M . We want to define the n-th
syzygy module of M .
Definition 1.2.1. Two left R-modules M 1 and M 2 are projective equivalent if there exist
two projective left R-modules P 1 and P 2 such that M 1 ⊕ P 1 ∼
= M2 ⊕ P 2 .
We point out that an R-module is equivalent to a projective module if and only if it is
projective.
The following lemma is a generalization of Schanuel’s Lemma [Rot09, Proposition 3.12].
Lemma 1.2.2 (Schanuel). Let M be a left R-module and let
0 → K n → P n−1 → · · · P 1 → P 0 → M → 0
0
0 → K n0 → P n−1
→ · · · P 10 → P 00 → M → 0,

be two exact sequences in mod(R), where P i and P i0 are projective R-modules, then K n and
K n0 are projective equivalent.
This leads us to define for each natural number n the n-th syzygy module of M as
ΩnR (M ) := K n .
The module ΩnR (M ) is defined up to projective equivalence. In fact, if we denote by
mod(R) the stable category of left R-modules, then ΩnR (−) is a functor mod(R) → mod(R).
We recall that the category mod(R) has the same objects of mod(R), and a morphism
f : M → N in mod(R) is an R-linear map modulo the relation that f ∼ g if f − g factors
through a projective module.
Using sygygy modules, we can define the projective dimension of a left R-module M as
proj.dimR (M ) := inf{n : ΩnR (M ) is projective}.
Schanuel’s Lemma and its generalization ensure us that this is well-defined.
We observe that ΩnR (M ) = 0 if proj.dimR (M ) < n and Ω0R (M ) = M , so M is projective if
and only if proj.dimR (M ) = 0.

21

1. Preliminaries and definitions

1.2.1. Syzygies over local rings
Over a Noetherian commutative local ring (R, m, k) working with syzygies is particularly nice. One can define the syzygy modules uniquely, without the projective equivalence condition, using the following construction.
Let M be a finitely generated R-module. We choose x 1 , . . . , x β0 a minimal system of
generators of M . By Nakayama’s Lemma the number β0 is unique, precisely it is the kvector space dimension
β0 = µ(M ) := dimk (M ⊗R k).
We fix an epimorphism ϕ0 : R β0 → M sending the canonical basis {e 1 , . . . , e β0 } of R β0 to
{x 1 , . . . , x β0 }. The module ker ϕ0 is again finitely generated, so we set β1 := µ(ker ϕ0 ) and
we continue similarly defining an epimorphism ϕ1 : R β1 → ker ϕ0 . Proceding in this manner we construct a minimal free resolution
ϕn

ϕ1

ϕ0

ϕ−1

F : · · · R βn −−→ R βn−1 → · · · → R β1 −→ R β0 −→ M −−→ 0,

(1.1)

which is uniquely determined by M up to isomorphism. The numbers βi (M ) := βi are
called the Betti numbers of M .
Definition 1.2.3. Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring and M a finitely generated Rmodule with minimal free resolution F as in (1.1). For every natural number n the n-th
syzygy module of M is
SyznR (M ) := ker ϕn−1 .
Since finite free modules are projective this definition is consistent with the previous
one, in other words SyznR (M ) is a representative of the projective equivalence class of
ΩnR (M ).

1.3. Reflexive modules
Let R be a Noetherian ring. We do not assume that R is commutative in this section,
so by R-module we mean left R-module. We denote by (−)∗ the contravariant functor
HomR (−, R) : mod(R) → mod(R). Then, for every left R-module M we have a canonical
map
λM : M → M ∗∗
such that λM (m)( f ) = f (m) for every f ∈ M ∗ . The homomorphism λM is in general not
injective nor surjective. We say that
• M is torsionless if λM is injective;
• M is reflexive if λM is bijective.
Example 1.3.1. The ring R is a reflexive R-module. Every finite free R-module is reflexive.

22

1.3. Reflexive modules
Lemma 1.3.2. Let R be a Noetherian domain and let M be a finite R-module. Then M is
reflexive if and only if M m is a reflexive R m -module for all maximal ideals m of R.
For every R-module M , the module
T (M ) := {m ∈ M : ∃r ∈ R non-zero-divisor, s.t. r · m = 0}
is called the torsion submodule of M . We say that
• M is torsion-free if T (M ) = 0;
• M is a torsion module if T (M ) = M .
In other words M is torsion-free if and only if all zero-divisors on R are zero-divisors on
M.
Torsionless and reflexive modules are very closely related to syzygies
Proposition 1.3.3. Let R be a Noetherian ring and let M be a finitely generated R-module.
Then the following facts hold.
1)
2)
3)
4)

M is torsionless if and only if it is a first syzygy.
If M is reflexive then it is a second syzygy.
Reflexive ⇒ torsionless ⇒ torsion-free.
If R is a domain and M is torsion-free, then M is torsionless.

Proof: 1) First assume that M is torsionless and let f 1 , . . . , f n be a set of generators for M ∗ .
We define a map ϕ : M → R n by ϕ(x) = ( f 1 (x), . . . , f n (x)). If ϕ(x) = 0 then f (x) = 0 for every
f ∈ M ∗ , so λM (x) = 0 which implies x = 0, since λM is injective. Hence ϕ is injective and
M is the first syzygy of the module Coker(ϕ). On the other hand, let M be the first syzygy
of an R-module N , that is
ψ

0→M −
→ R m → N → 0.
Let x be a non-zero element of M , then there exists an index j such that π j ψ(x) 6= 0,
where π j : R m → R is the j -th canonical projection. Then π j ψ ∈ M ∗ does not vanish on
x, so x ∉ kerλM .
2) We consider a free presentation of the dual F 2 → F 1 → M ∗ → 0. We apply the left
exact functor HomR (−, R) and we get
0 → M ∗∗ → F 1∗ → F 2∗ .
Since M ∗∗ ∼
= M , this shows that M is a second syzygy.
3) Reflexive modules are clearly torsionless from the definition. For the second implication, we have that a torsionless module M is a submodule of a free module by 1). So
non-zero-divisors on R are zero-divisors on M .
4) Let f 1 , . . . , f m be a system of generators of M , and let S = R \{0}. Then the localization
M S is a finite dimensional vector space over the quotient ring Q(R) = S −1 R. Thus, it can

23

1. Preliminaries and definitions
be embedded in Q(R)n for some positive integer n. We obtain an injective homomorphism of R-modules ψ : M → Q(R)n given by the composition
M ,→ M S ,→ Q(R)n .
Actually the map ψ is given by f i 7→ s1i (r i ,1 , . . . , r i ,n ) for some s i ∈ S and r i , j ∈ R. Let s =
s 1 · · · s m , and consider the map ϕ given by the composition
s

ψ

M→
− M−
→ Q(R)n .
The image of ϕ is contained in R n , and since multiplication by s is injective on M , ϕ :
M → R n is also injective. Therefore M is a first syzygy, hence torsionless by 1). 2
Example 1.3.4. The last implication of Proposition 1.3.3 is no longer true if we remove
the finitely generated hypothesis on M . For example Q is a torsion-free Z-module which
is not torsionless.
From now on, we will restrict our attention almost exclusively to finitely generated
modules. We denote by Ref(R) the category whose objects are finitely generated reflexive
left R-modules and whose maps are just R-linear homomorphisms between them. Then
Ref(R) is a full subcategory of mod(R).
The converse of 2) in Proposition 1.3.3 does not hold in general, however we have the
following characterization of reflexive modules in terms of syzygies.
Lemma 1.3.5. Let R be a Noetherian domain and let M be a finitely generated R-module.
Then the following facts are equivalent.
1) M is reflexive.
2) There exists a short exact sequence 0 → M → F → N → 0 with F finite free and N
torsion-free.
Proof: We consider a short exact sequence as in 2) and we apply the functor (−)∗∗ . We
get a commutative diagram
0

M

F

N

0

0

M ∗∗

F ∗∗

N ∗∗

0.

The first row of the diagram is exact, while the second one may not be. Anyway the map
F → F ∗∗ is an isomorphism, since F is finite free, hence reflexive, and the map N → N ∗∗
is injective since N is torsionless, being torsion-free and finitely generated over a domain.
The module M ∗∗ is torsion-free, so the map M ∗∗ → F ∗∗ is injective. Then by diagram
chasing we obtain that M is reflexive.
Conversely, assume that M is reflexive. As in the proof of Proposition 1.3.3 we have an
ϕ
exact sequence 0 → M ∗∗ ∼
→ F 1 → F 2 , with F 1 and F 2 finite free. It is clear that the
=M −
module Cokerϕ is torsion-free. 2

24

1.3. Reflexive modules
Lemma 1.3.6. Let R be a Noetherian ring and let M be a finitely generated R-module.
Then M ∗ is a reflexive module.
Proof: Consider the canonical map λM ∗ : M ∗ → M ∗∗∗ , and let f 6= 0 be an element of
M ∗ . We prove that f ∗∗ := λM ∗ ( f ) is not zero. Since f 6= 0, there exists x ∈ M such that
f (x) 6= 0. Let Evx ∈ M ∗∗ be the evaluation at x, we have f ∗∗ (Evx ) = f (x) 6= 0, so f ∗∗ 6= 0
and λM ∗ is injective.
For surjectivity, let g ∈ M ∗∗∗ . We consider the map h = g ◦ λM : M → R. Then h ∈ M ∗ ,
and the following diagram
g

M ∗∗
λM

R

h

M
shows that λM ∗ (h) = g . 2
Proposition 1.3.7. Let R be a Noetherian ring, let M 1 and M 2 be reflexive R-modules and
let N be an R-module. Then the following facts hold.
1) M 1 ⊕ M 2 is reflexive.
2) HomR (N , M 1 ) is reflexive.
3) Let N be a direct summand of M 1 , then N is reflexive.
Since projective modules are direct summands of finite free modules, which are reflexive, we immediately get the following.
Corollary 1.3.8. Let R be a Noetherian ring and let M be a finitely generated projective
R-module. Then M is reflexive.
We recall that proj(R) denotes the category of finitely generated projective left R-modules.
From the previous corollary we have the following inclusions of categories:
proj(R) ⊆ Ref(R) ⊆ mod(R).
Example 1.3.9. Reflexive modules are in general not projective. Consider R = k[x 2 , x y, y 2 ],
the module M = (x 2 , x y) is reflexive, but not projective.
Definition 1.3.10. Let R be a Noetherian domain and let M be a finitely generated Rmodule. The module M ∗∗ = HomR (HomR (M , R), R) is called the reflexive hull of M .
The name reflexive hull makes sense, since by Lemma 1.3.6 M ∗∗ is a reflexive module.
Thus, we have a functor
(−)∗∗ : mod(R) → Ref(R),
which is a left adjoint to the inclusion functor Ref(R) ,→ mod(R). To see this it is enough
to see that if N ∈ Ref(R) every R-module map f : M → N factors through the reflexive hull

25

1. Preliminaries and definitions
of M , that is
f

M

N

λM

M

∗∗

.

Given two reflexive R-modules M and N the tensor product M ⊗R N does not need to
be reflexive. For example consider R = kx, y/(x y) and M = (x, y). Then M is reflexive,
but the tensor product M ⊗R M is not even torsionless.
For this reason, after Auslander [Aus86b] it is convenient to introduce the following
definition.
Definition 1.3.11. Let M , N ∈ Ref(R). The reflexive tensor product of M and N is the
module
M R N := (M ⊗R N )∗∗ .
Now for each M , N , L ∈ Ref(R) we have a natural homomorphism M ⊗R N → M R
'
N , which induces an R-isomorphism HomR (M R N , L) −
→ HomR (M ⊗R N , L), which is
functorial in M , N and L. From the usual hom-tensor adjunction HomR (M ⊗R N , L) ∼
=
HomR (M , HomR (N , L)) we get the isomorphism
'

HomR (M R N , L) −
→ HomR (M , HomR (N , L)).
In fact we obtained an adjunction in the category Ref(R).
Proposition 1.3.12. Let M be a reflexive R-module. Then the reflexive tensor product
functor M R − is left adjoint to the Hom-functor HomR (M , −).
Proposition 1.3.13. Let M 1 , M 2 , M 3 ∈ Ref(R). Then
M 1 R M 2 ∼
= M 2 R M 1 , (M 1 R M 2 ) R M 3 ∼
= M 1 R (M 2 R M 3 ).
q

As for the tensor product, also the q-th symmetric power SymR (M ) of a reflexive module need not to be reflexive. With the same spirit of the reflexive tensor product, we give
the following definition.
Definition 1.3.14. Let M ∈ Ref(R) and let q be a natural number. The q-th reflexive sym¡
¢∗∗
q
metric power of M is the R-module SymR (M ) .

1.4. Depth and Serre’s conditions
Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian commutative local ring, we recall the definition of depth
of an R-module.

26

1.4. Depth and Serre’s conditions
Definition 1.4.1. A sequence x 1 , . . . , x n of elements in m is called an M -regular sequence
if x 1 is a non-zero-divisor in M , x i +1 is a non-zero-divisor in M /(x 1 , . . . , x i )M for any i ∈
{1, . . . , n−1}, and (x 1 , . . . , x n )M 6= M . The depth of M is denoted by depthR (M ) and is equal
to the maximal lenght of an M -regular sequence in m.
Remark 1.4.2. The definition of regular sequence may depend a priori on the order of
the elements, however in this setting this is not the case. In fact, if x 1 , . . . , x n is an M regular sequence, then every permutation x π(1) , . . . , x π(n) is an M -sequence (cf. [BH98,
Exercise 1.2.21]).
When the ring R is clear from the context we will denote the depth of M simply by
depth M .
The following well-known inequality holds for any finitely generated R-module M :
depth M ≤ dim M ≤ dim R,
where dim R denotes the Krull dimension of R and dim M the Krull dimension of M ,
defined as dim M = dim(R/AnnR (M )).
The projective dimension and the depth of a module are related by the AuslanderBuchsbaum formula (cf. [BH98, Theorem 1.3.3]).
Theorem 1.4.3 (Auslander-Buchsbaum). Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring and M 6=
0 a finitely generated R-module such that proj.dimR (M ) < ∞. Then
proj.dimR (M ) + depthR (M ) = depthR.
Moreover, we recall that in this setting projective modules and free modules coincide,
and that the finiteness of the projective dimension of the residue field k characterizes
regularity (cf. [BH98, Theorem 2.2.7]).
Theorem 1.4.4. Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring and let M be a finitely generated
R-module. Then the following facts are equivalent.
1) M is free.
2) M is projective.
3) M is flat.
Remark 1.4.5. The implications 1) ⇒ 2) ⇒ 3) hold in every Noetherian ring.
Theorem 1.4.6 (Auslander-Buchsbaum-Serre). Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring.
Then the following facts are equivalent.
1) R is regular.
2) proj.dimR (M ) < ∞ for every finitely generated R-module M .
3) proj.dimR (k) < ∞.

27

1. Preliminaries and definitions
The depth of an R-module can be characterized in terms of local cohomology and Extfunctor. Local cohomology is an important tool in commutative algebra and algebraic
geometry. We recall here the definition and some properties in our particular setting.
For a more general introduction and proofs of these facts we recommend the books of
Brodmann and Sharp [BS98], and of Iyengar et al. [ILLMMSW07].
Definition 1.4.7. Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring, then the functor Γm : mod(R) →
mod(R) given by
M 7→ Γm (M ) := {x ∈ M : mt x = 0 for some t > 0}.
i
is left exact. Its derived functors are the local cohomology functors, that is Hm
(M ) :=
i
R Γm (M ) for all R-modules M .

Lemma 1.4.8. Let M be an R-module. Then
depthR (M ) = inf{i ∈ N : ExtiR (R/m, M ) 6= 0}
i
= inf{i ∈ N : Hm
(M ) 6= 0}.

From the long exact sequence of Ext-modules it is easy to prove the following wellknown result.
Lemma 1.4.9 (Depth Lemma). Let 0 → L → M → N → 0 be a short exact sequence of
finitely generated R-modules. Then the following facts hold.
1) If depth N < depth M , then depth L = depth N + 1.
2) depth L ≥ min{depth M , depth N }.
3) depth M ≥ min{depth L, depth N }.
Definition 1.4.10. Let M be a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring R and let
n be a natural number. We say that M satisfies Serre’s condition (S n ) provided
depthRp (M p ) ≥ min{n, dim R p },
for every p ∈ SpecR.
Remark 1.4.11. We point out that this definition agrees with the one given by Leuschke
and Wiegand [LW12, p. 310], but differs from the one given by Bruns and Herzog [BH98,
p. 63], who require that depthRp (M p ) ≥ min{n, dim M p }. Of course if the module M is the
ring R then the two definitions coincide. The main motivation for our choice should be
found in the upcoming Lemma 1.4.14.
The following theorem is known as Serre’s criterion for normality (cf. [Ser00, Theorem
IV.D.11]).
Theorem 1.4.12 (Serre). Let R be a Noetherian ring. Then the following facts are equivalent.

28

1.4. Depth and Serre’s conditions
1) R is a normal domain.
2) R satisfies (S 2 ) and R p is a regular local ring for each prime ideal p such that ht(p) ≤ 1.
Lemma 1.4.13. Let M and N be finitely generated modules over a local ring (R, m, k). Then
depth HomR (M , N ) ≥ min{2, depth N }
Proof: For depth N = 0 there is nothing to prove. If depth N = 1, then there exists r ∈ m
such that r · n 6= 0 for all non-zero n ∈ N . It follows that if ϕ ∈ HomR (M , N ) is non-zero,
then also r · ϕ is non-zero. Thus r is a regular element for HomR (M , N ), and the claim is
proved.
Now assume that depth N ≥ 2 and let x, y ∈ m be a regular sequence for N . The previous observation implies that x is a regular element for HomR (M , N ), so it remains to
show that y is non-zero-divisor for HomR (M , N )/x HomR (M , N ).
Let ϕ ∈ HomR (M , N ) such that y · [ϕ] = [0] in HomR (M , N )/x HomR (M , N ), we prove
that [ϕ] = [0]. Since y · [ϕ] = [0], there exists ψ ∈ HomR (M , N ) such that y · ϕ = x · ψ. It
follows that for every m ∈ M we have y · ϕ(m) = x · ψ(m), which is 0 in N /xN . But y is
regular for N /xN , then [ϕ(m)] = [0] in N /xN . Therefore there exists n m ∈ M such that
ϕ(m) = n m . We define a function f ∈ HomR (M , N ) by f (m) = n m , then we have ϕ = x · f ,
which implies that [ϕ] = [0]. 2
The following lemma is due to Auslander and Buchsbaum [AB59], the reader may consult also [LW12, Lemma 5.11].
Lemma 1.4.14 (Auslander-Buchsbaum). Let R be a commutative Noetherian ring and let
f : M → N be a homomorphism of finitely generated R-modules such that M satisfies (S 2 )
and N satisfies (S 1 ). If the map f p : M p → Np is
• injective for every minimal prime p;
• surjective for every prime ideal p of height ≤ 1;
then f is an isomorphism.
The following two results show how the reflexive property can be characterized using
the depth and Serre’s conditions.
Lemma 1.4.15. Let R be a Noetherian domain and let M be a finitely generated R-module.
Then the following facts are equivalent.
1) M is reflexive.
2) For every prime ideal p of R one of the following happens
a) M p is a reflexive R p -module, or
b) depth(R p ) ≥ 2 and depth(M p ) ≥ 2.
Proof: If 1) is true, then 2) follows from Lemma 1.3.2 and Lemma 1.4.13 applied to R p∗∗ ∼
=
R p and M p∗∗ ∼
= Mp .

29

1. Preliminaries and definitions
Conversely, assume that 2) holds. We fix N = M ∗∗ and we consider the canonical map
λ : M → N . We want to apply Lemma 1.4.14 to λ. It is easy to check that conditions a)
and b) imply that M and R are (S 2 ). Let p be a prime ideal of R. If a) holds, then the map
λp : M p → Np is an isomorphism, otherwise depth R p ≥ 2, which implies that also the
height of p is ≥ 2. Therefore by Lemma 1.4.14, λ is an isomorphism, that is M is reflexive.

2

Theorem 1.4.16. Let R be a Noetherian normal domain and let M be a finitely generated
R-module. Then the following facts are equivalent.
1) M is reflexive.
2) M is torsion-free and has property (S 2 ).
Proof: We observe that in both cases M is torsion-free. Let p be a prime ideal of R.
If the height of p is ≤ 1, then by Serre’s criterion for normality (Theorem 1.4.12) R p is a
regular local ring of dimension ≤ 1. Thus, the torsion-free module M p is finite free, hence
reflexive. If the height of p is ≥ 2, then again by Theorem 1.4.12 we have depth R p ≥ 2. It
follows by Lemma 1.4.15 that M is reflexive if and only if depth M p ≥ 2 for primes of height
≥ 2, which in this case is equivalent to the (S 2 ) condition. 2

1.5. Maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules
We introduce another important class of modules: maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules (MCM for short). We will see how these modules are related to reflexive modules
and to syzygies. Then we will investigate some of their properties, which will be useful
later on. Every ring in this section is commutative and Noetherian.
Definition 1.5.1. Let (R, m) be a Noetherian local ring. An R-module M is Cohen-Macaulay
(abbr. CM) if depthR (M ) = dim M .
An R-module M is maximal Cohen-Macaulay (abbr. MCM) if depthR (M ) = dim R.
The ring R is Cohen-Macaulay ring if it is a Cohen-Macaulay R-module.
Even if we will work mainly with local rings, CM modules may be defined also in the
non-local setting thanks to the following proposition (cf. [Eis94, Proposition 18.8]).
Proposition 1.5.2. Let (R, m) be a Noetherian local ring and M a CM R-module, then M p
is CM over R p for all prime ideals p of R.
Definition 1.5.3. Let R be a Noetherian ring and M an R-module. M is CM (resp. MCM)
if M m is CM (MCM) over R m for all maximal ideals m of R. R is a Cohen-Macaulay ring if
it is a CM module.
Example 1.5.4. Some easy examples of CM rings and modules are the following.
• Regular rings are Cohen-Macaulay.

30

1.5. Maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules
•
•
•
•

An Artinian ring R (i.e. dim R = 0) is Cohen-Macaulay.
A domain of Krull dimension 1 is Cohen-Macaulay.
The two-dimensional ring kx, y, z/(x 4 − y z) is Cohen-Macaulay.
A finite free R-module is MCM.

Given a Noetherian ring R we denote by MCM(R) the full-subcategory of mod(R) consisting of all maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules.
Thanks to the following result of Grothendieck (cf. [BH98, Theorem 3.5.7]) we can
give a homological characterization of the Cohen-Macaulay property. Notice that the
i
(M ) for i < depthR (M ) is a consequence of Lemma 1.4.8.
vanishing of Hm
Theorem 1.5.5 (Grothendieck). Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring and M a finitely
generated R-module of depth t and dimension d . Then the following facts hold.
i
1) Hm
(M ) = 0 for i < t and i > d .
d
t
(M ) 6= 0.
2) Hm (M ) 6= 0 and Hm

Corollary 1.5.6. Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring and M an R-module. Then the
following facts are equivalent.
1) M is MCM over R.
2) ExtiR (k, M ) = 0 for i < dim R.
i
3) Hm
(M ) = 0 for i 6= dim R.
We use Corollary 1.5.6 to prove some basic results on MCM modules.
Proposition 1.5.7. Let (R, m) ⊆ (T, n) be a finite extension of local Noetherian rings and M
a Noetherian T -module. Then M is MCM over R if and only if it is MCM over T .
Proof: The forgetful functor mod(T ) → mod(R) is exact, therefore Γn (M ) ∼
= Γm (M ) as
i
i
∼
R-modules. Hence also Hn (M ) = Hm (M ) for all i ≥ 0, which concludes the proof. 2
Under the assumptions of Proposition 1.5.7, if the ring R is regular the map R → T
is called a Noether normalization of T . So Proposition 1.5.7 states that the property of
being MCM is invariant under Noether normalization.
The following is an immediate consequence of the Depth Lemma
Proposition 1.5.8. Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring and let 0 → L → M → N → 0 be
a short exact sequence of MCM R-modules. Then the following facts hold.
1) If L and N are MCM, then so is M .
2) If M and N are MCM, then so is L.
Remark 1.5.9. It is not necessary that if L and M are MCM then so is N . As a counterexample consider the power series ring in one variable R = kx and the following short
exact sequence of R-modules
·x 2

0 → R −−→ R → R/(x 2 ) → 0.

31

1. Preliminaries and definitions
As a consequence of the Auslander-Buchsbaum formula (Theorem 1.4.3) the theory of
MCM modules over regular local rings is trivial.
Proposition 1.5.10. Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local regular ring and M a finitely generated R-module. Then M is maximal Cohen-Macaulay if and only if it is free.
Proof: Since M is a finitely generated module over a regular ring it has finite projective
dimension by Theorem 1.4.6. Then the Auslander-Buchsbaum formula
proj.dimR (M ) + depthR (M ) = depthR = dim R
implies that M is free if and only if proj.dimR (M ) = 0 if and only if dim R −depthR (M ) = 0,
which is the definition of MCM. 2
Combining this result with Corollary 1.5.7 we get the following.
Corollary 1.5.11. Let R → T be a Noether normalization of the local ring T . Then a T module M is MCM over T if and only if it is R-free.
We consider now maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules over rings of low dimension. The
zero-dimensional case is trivial, since every finitely generated module is automatically
MCM. In dimension one and two the situation is clarified by the following proposition.
Proposition 1.5.12. Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring and let M be a finitely generated R-module. Then the following facts hold.
1) If R is reduced of dimension one, then M is MCM if and only if it is torsion-free.
2) If R is a normal domain of dimension two, then M is MCM if and only if it is reflexive,
that is Ref(R) = MCM(R).
3) If R is a normal domain of dimension ≥ 3, then every MCM R-module is reflexive. However it is not true in general that reflexive modules are MCM.
Proof: It follows from the definition that M is torsion-free if and only if HomR (R/m, M ) =
0, which is equivalent to depthR (M ) ≥ 1. Since depthR (M ) ≤ dim M ≤ dim R, if the ring
has dimension 1 the condition depthR (M ) ≥ 1 is equivalent to the module being maximal
Cohen-Macaulay. This proves 1).
Now we prove that for normal domains of dimension ≥ 2 MCM modules are reflexive.
Let M be an MCM R-module, then M p is MCM over R p for every prime ideal p. If ht(p) ≤ 1,
then by Serre’s criterion (Theorem 1.4.12) R p is regular, so M p is free, in particular it is
reflexive. If ht(p) ≥ 2 then again by Serre’s criterion depth R p ≥ 2 so M p is reflexive. Then
Lemma 1.3.2 implies that M is reflexive.
Conversely, assume that R has dimension 2 and that M is reflexive. Let p be a prime
ideal of R and apply Lemma 1.4.15. If depth R p = 2 then M p is MCM. If depth R p ≤ 1 then
M p is reflexive, hence MCM by 1). Then by Proposition 1.5.2 M is MCM. 2
One of the most challenging problems in the theory of maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules is to determine whether the category MCM(R) has only finitely many isomorphism
classes of indecomposable MCM modules or not.

32

1.5. Maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules
Definition 1.5.13. Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring, and let M = {M 1 , . . . , M r } be
a set of MCM R-modules. We say that R has finite Cohen-Macaulay type given by M if
⊕n
⊕n
every MCM R-module is isomorphic to a direct sum M 1 1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ M r r for some natural
numbers n 1 , . . . , n r .
Example 1.5.14. If R is regular, then the MCM modules are exactly the free modules by
Proposition 1.5.10, so R has finite CM type given by M = {R}.
Remark 1.5.15. If MCM(R) is a Krull-Schmidt category, then to say that R is of finite CM
type is equivalent to the condition that MCM(R) has only a finite number of isomorphism
classes of indecomposable objects.
Proposition 1.5.16 below furnish a way to construct examples of MCM modules: it is
enough to take n-th syzygies, where n is bigger or equal to the dimension of the ring. One
of the modules arising in this way is particularly interesting. It is the top-dimensional
R
syzygy module of the residue field k, that is Syzdim
(k). The main reason is that this
R
module characterizes the regularity of the ring, as shown in Corollary 1.5.17. This is actually a consequence of the Auslander-Buchsbaum-Serre Theorem.
Proposition 1.5.16. Let (R, m, k) be a Cohen-Macaulay local ring of Krull dimension d .
Then for any finitely generated R-module M and for any integer n ≥ d the module SyznR (M )
is either 0 or maximal Cohen-Macaulay.
Proof: Assume that SyznR (M ) 6= 0, then a minimal free resolution of M has length at least
n, so we can write the exact sequence
ϕn−1

ϕ1

0 → SyznR (M ) → F n−1 −−−→ · · · → F 1 −→ F 0 ,

(1.2)

where the modules F i are finite free. From (1.2) we get the short exact sequence
0 → SyznR (M ) → F n−1 → SyzRn−1 (M ) → 0,
since Syzn−1
R (M ) = Imϕn−1 = ker ϕn−2 . The Depth Lemma yields the recursive formula
depthR (SyznR (M )) = min{d , depthR (Syzn−1
R (M )) + 1}.
Thus if n ≥ d then depthR (SyznR (M )) ≥ d , so SyznR (M ) is MCM. 2
Corollary 1.5.17. Let (R, m, k) be a CM ring of Krull dimension d . Then R is regular if and
only if SyzdR (k) is free.
Proof: Theorem 1.4.3 and Theorem 1.4.6 combined give the following chain of equivalences:
R is regular ⇔

proj.dimR (k) < ∞

⇔

proj.dimR (k) = d − depthR (k) ≤ d

⇔

SyzdR (k) is free.

2

33

1. Preliminaries and definitions

1.5.1. Geometry of MCM modules
From a geometric point of view, maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules can be seen as a
measure of the singularities of the ring. Over a regular ring MCM modules are exactly
the free modules, so in a certain sense there exists no non-trivial MCM module. The next
step in this direction is a ring of finite CM type, where only finitely many indecomposable MCM modules appear up to isomorphism. A beautiful result of Auslander says that
these rings are necessarily isolated singularities, so they are not too much complicated
in geometric terms.
Moreover, it turns out that the category of MCM modules over isolated singularites has
interesting properties. In particular, since MCM modules are locally free over the punctured spectrum U of an isolated singularity, they correspond to vector bundles over U .
This is a powerful and important tool to translate algebraic information into geometric
information and viceversa.
Definition 1.5.18. Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring. R is called an isolated singularity if for any p ∈ Spec(R), p 6= m, the ring R p is regular.
Note that we include also regular rings in this definition. Sometimes we will say that
a ring has at most an isolated singularity to stress this fact. Rephrasing Serre’s criterion
for normality (Theorem 1.4.12) we obtain the following important characterization of
isolated singularity in dimension two.
Theorem 1.5.19 (Serre). A two-dimensional local domain is normal if and only if it is
Cohen-Macaulay and isolated.
Definition 1.5.20. Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring. A finitely generated module M
is called locally free on the punctured spectrum if the R p -module M p is free for any prime
ideal p 6= m.
Lemma 1.5.21 below is a direct consequence of Proposition 1.5.2 and Proposition 1.5.10.
Lemma 1.5.21. Let (R, m, k) be a Cohen-Macaulay isolated singularity and let M be a
MCM R-module. Then M is locally-free on the punctured spectrum.
The following result was first proved by Auslander in [Aus86a] in the complete setting
using the theory of almost split sequences. Huneke and Leuschke [HL02] gave a shorter
proof and extended the result also to non-complete CM rings.
Theorem 1.5.22 (Auslander). Let (R, m, k) be a local Cohen-Macaulay ring of finite CohenMacaulay type. Then R is an isolated singularity.
Lemma 1.5.23. Let (R, m, k) be a normal two-dimensional local domain, let X = SpecR,
and let U = X \ {m}. For a torsion-free finitely generated R-module M we have an isomorphism
f).
M ∗∗ ∼
= Γ(U , M

34

1.5. Maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules
Proof: First of all, we assume that M is MCM. From the exact sequence
0
1
f) → Hm
0 → Hm
(M ) → M → Γ(U , M
(M ) → 0,
1
0
f), since Hm
(M ) = 0 for a MCM module M .
(M ) = Hm
we obtain that M ∼
= Γ(U , M

Now, let M be torsion-free and consider the following short exact sequence
0 → M → M ∗∗ → T → 0.
Since M and M ∗∗ have the same Krull dimension, T is zero-dimensional, hence it has
finite length. For every prime ideal p 6= m we have Tp = 0, so we obtain an isomorphism
∗∗ | . Moreover M ∗∗ is MCM, so we have

f|U ∼
of sheaves M
=M
U
∗∗ ) ∼

f),
M ∗∗ ∼
= Γ(U , M
= Γ(U , M

which concludes the proof. 2
Remark 1.5.24. We point out that in the proof of Lemma 1.5.23 we proved actually that
∗∗ on the punctured spectrum U coincide with the restric
the restriction of the sheaf M
f, that is
tion to U of the sheaf M
∗∗ | = M

f|U .
M
U
Corollary 1.5.25. Let (R, m, k) be a normal two-dimensional local ring, and let VB(U )
denote the category of vector bundles over U = SpecR \ {m}. Then the functor MCM(R) →
f|U is an equivalence of
VB(U ) mapping a MCM R-module M to the locally free sheaf M
categories. Moreover, for any two objects M 1 , M 2 ∈ MCM(R) we have
∼¯¯ ∼ f
f2 |U .
M 1 R M 2 ¯ = M 1 |U ⊗ M
U

Remark 1.5.26. If the ring R has a canonical module K R , then many authors consider the
canonical dual (−)∨ := HomR (−, K R ), instead of the standard dual (−)∗ = HomR (−, R).
Lemma 1.5.23 is true also for the canonical dual, see for example [BD08, Proposition
3.10].

35

2. Signatures
Some say the view is crazy, but you
may adopt another point of view.
David Bowie
Black Country Rock

2.1. F-signature
We want to give a short review of the F-signature, which is the main inspiration that
lead us to the definition of the symmetric signature. This is by no mean intended to be
a complete survey on F-signature, rather we will focus on those properties and results
that we consider important to understand the connection between these two numerical
invariants.
We recall some general facts about rings of prime characteristic. Let R be a commutative ring containing a field of prime characteristic p. With the letter e we always denote
a natural number, and with q = p e a power of the characteristic. The Frobenius homomorphism is the ring homomorphism F : R → R, F (r ) = r p , we often consider also its
iterates F e : R → R, F e (r ) = r q . For any finitely generated R module M , we denote by eM
the R-module M , whose multiplicative structure is pulled back via F e . The scalar multiplication on eM is given by r · m := r q m, for any r ∈ R, m ∈ eM . If R is reduced, we can
identify the Frobenius map F e : R →e R with the inclusion R ,→ R 1/q , where R 1/q is the
over-ring of q-th roots of elements of R.
We say that R is F-finite if 1R is a finitely generated R-module, and we say that R is
F-split if the Frobenius map F : R → 1R splits. If (R, m, k) is a complete Noetherian local
ring, then R is F-finite if and only if [k 1/p : k] is finite. We will always assume that our rings
are F-finite, and that k is perfect, that is [k 1/p : k] = 1. The latter is not a strong restriction,
but it is done simply to avoid that numbers like [k 1/p : k] appear in the definitions and in
the results.
Remark 2.1.1. If R is F-finite and Cohen-Macaulay, then eR is a maximal Cohen-Macaulay
module for every e ∈ N. Actually, if x 1 , . . . , x n is a maximal R-regular sequence, then it is
also an eR-regular sequence for every e ∈ N.
Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring of characteristic p > 0 and let I = ( f 1 , . . . , f r ) be

37

2. Signatures
q

q

an m-primary ideal. We denote by I [q] the ideal ( f 1 , . . . , f r ), which does not depend on
the choice of the generators f 1 , . . . , f r .
Definition 2.1.2. The numerical function H K (I , −) given by
¡
¢
H K (I , q) := l R R/I [q] ,
where q = p e , is called Hilbert-Kunz function of R with respect to I .
Theorem 2.1.3 (Monsky). Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring of characteristic p > 0
and dimension d and let I be an m-primary ideal. Then there exists a positive real number
e H K (I ) such that
H K (I , q) = e H K (I )q d + O(q d −1 ).
The number e H K (I ) is called Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity of I . If I = m, then we denote it
also by e H K (R) and we speak of the Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity of the ring R.
The Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity is a characteristic p analogue of the classical HilbertSamuel multiplicity of local rings (cf. [Ser00, Chapter V]). As the classical multiplicity,
also the Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity encodes information about the singularites of the ring.
Watanabe and Yoshida [WY00] proved that if R is unmixed, then R is regular if and only
if e H K (R) = 1. Moreover the Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity is also related with F-singularities
arising from tight closure theory. For a survey on Hilbert-Kunz function and multiplicity,
and their connection with F-singularities, the reader may consult the excellent book of
Huneke [Hun96], or his notes [Hun13].
The F-signature is a more recent development, and was defined by Huneke and Leuschke
[HL02]. They continued the work, started by Smith and Van Den Bergh [SVB96], of looking at the free R-summands of the module eR for e → +∞.
Let (R, m, k) be a d -dimensional Noetherian reduced local ring of prime characteristic
p, which is F-finite and such that k is perfect. For every q = p e , we denote by a q = frkR (eR)
the free rank of eR. In other words, a q is choosen such that
R∼
= R aq ⊕ M q ,

e

and the module M q contains no free R-direct summands.
Definition 2.1.4. The F-signature of R, denoted by s(R) is the limit
s(R) := lim

e→+∞

aq
qd

.

It is not easy to prove that the limit defining the F-signature exists. It was proved by
Huneke and Leuschke [HL02] assuming that R is Gorenstein, and then in some other
special cases by other authors (see e.g. [Yao05] for rings of finite F-representation type,
or [Sin05] for affine semigroup rings). Finally, Tucker [Tuc12] proved that the F-signature
exists for every reduced F-finite Noetherian local ring.

38

2.1. F-signature
Remark 2.1.5. If R is a domain of dimension d , then rankR (eR) = q d . So we can write the
limit defining the F-signature as
frkR (eR)
.
e→+∞ rankR (eR)

s(R) = lim

Remark 2.1.6. Almost at the same time of Huneke and Leuschke, Watanabe and Yoshida
[WY04] introduced the notion of minimal relative Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity. This is defined as
¡
¢
l R R/annR z q
me H K (R) := lim inf
,
e→+∞
qd
where z is a generator of the socle of the injective hull of the residue field k. If R is Gorenstein this is in fact
me H K (R) = e H K (J ) − e H K (J : m),
(2.1)
for any parameter ideal J of R. Yao [Yao06] proved that the minimal relative Hilbert-Kunz
multiplicity coincide with the F-signature.
The F-signature is always a real number in the interval [0, 1]. The extreme value 1 is
obtained if and only if the ring is regular. This is a consequence of the results of Watanabe
and Yoshida [WY00] and Proposition 2.1.7 below.
Proposition 2.1.7. Let (R, m, k) be a reduced F-finite Cohen-Macaulay local ring such that
k is infinite, Then
(e(R) − 1)(1 − s(R)) ≥ e H K (R) − 1,
where e H K (R) is the Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity and e(R) is the Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity.
Theorem 2.1.8 (Watanabe-Yoshida). Let (R, m, k) be a reduced F-finite local ring such that
k is infinite and perfect. Then s(R) = 1 if and only if R is regular.
Also the value s(R) = 0 has a special meaning in terms of the singularities of the ring, it
is equivalent to the ring being not strongly F-regular, an important notion in tight closure
theory.
Definition 2.1.9. The ring R is strongly F-regular if for every c ∈ R not in any minimal
prime of R the inclusion Rc 1/q ⊆ R 1/q splits for q À 0. R is called weakly F-regular provided every ideal of R is tightly closed.
The following implications hold
regular =⇒ strongly F-regular =⇒ weakly F-regular,

(2.2)

and the last arrow can be reversed in some special cases (e.g. for Gorenstein rings [Hun96]
or for F-finite N-graded rings [LS99]), but it is not known in general. Moreover, we mention the fact that weakly F-regular rings are always Cohen-Macaulay and normal.

39

2. Signatures
Theorem 2.1.10 (Aberbach-Leuschke, [AL03]). Let (R, m, k) be a reduced excellent F-finite
local ring of prime characteristic such that k is perfect. Then s(R) > 0 if and only if R is
strongly F-regular.
Remark 2.1.11. If the ring R has dimension 0 or 1, then it is normal if and only if it is regular. Therefore, from the implications in (2.2) it follows that strongly F-regular is equivalent to regular. So by Theorem 2.1.8 and Theorem 2.1.10 we have only two possibilities
for the F-signature of R. We have s(R) = 1 if R is regular, and s(R) = 0 otherwise.
Theorem 2.1.8 and Theorem 2.1.10 justify the statement that F-signature measures singularities. Roughly speaking, the closer the F-signature to 1 is, the nicer the singularity. Further examples are: the F-signature of quotient singularities computed by Watanabe and Yoshida [WY04], the F-signature of normal monomial rings computed by Singh
[Sin05], and the F-signature of coordinate rings of affine toric varieties computed by Von
Korff [VKo11].
Theorem 2.1.12 (Watanabe-Yoshida). Let R = kx 1 , . . . x n G be a quotient singularity over
a field k of prime characteristic p. Assume that the acting group G ⊆ GL(n, k) is a small
finite group such that that (p, |G|) = 1. Then the F-signature of R is
s(R) =

1
.
|G|

For the definition of small group and related properties look at Definition 3.5.3 and the
corresponding Section 3.5 on quotient singularities.
Theorem 2.1.13 (Singh). Let k be a perfect field of positive characteristic and let R be a
normal subring of the polynomial ring k[x 1 , . . . , x d ] which is generated, as k-algebra, by
monomials in the variables x 1 , . . . , x d . Then the F-signature s(R) exists and is a positive
rational number which does not depend on the characteristic of k.
Example 2.1.14 ([Sin05]). Let k be a perfect field of characteristic p > 0 and let R be the
n-th Veronese subring of S = k[x 1 , . . . , x d ], where d ≥ 2 and n ≥ 1. In other words, R is
the subring of S which is generated by the monomials of degree n. For d = 2 we have the
Veronese ring of further Example 4.5.1. The F-signature of R is s(R) = n1 .
Theorem 2.1.15 (Von Korff). Let N be a lattice and let M = N ∗ be its dual. Let σ ⊆ N ⊗Z R
be a full-dimensional strongly convex rational polyhedral cone with primitive generators
v 1 , . . . , v r . Let k be a perfect field of prime characteristic, let S = M ∩ σ∨ , and let R = k[S].
Then R is the coordinate ring of an affine toric variety, and the F-signature of R is
s(R) = Vol (P σ ) ,
where P σ = {w ∈ M ⊗Z R : 0 ≤ w · v i < 1, ∀i = 1, . . . , r } is a polytope.
In all examples known so far, the F-signature is a rational number. Thus, it is natural
to ask whether this is always true.

40

2.1. F-signature
Question 2.1.16. Is the F-signature always a rational number?
The same question has been asked for the Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity as well. In this
case for a long time a positive answer seemed to be the most reasonable, however Monsky [Mon08] proposed the following conjecture, which is supported by a huge amount of
numerical evidence.
Conjecture 2.1.17 (Monsky). Let k be a finite field of characteristic 2 and h = x 3 + y 3 +
x y z ∈ kx, y, z. Then the Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity of the hypersurface R/ f , where f =
uv + h and R = kx, y, z, u, v is
e H K (R/ f ) =

3
5
+ p .
4 14 7

Remark 2.1.18. The ring R/ f of Monsky’s example is Gorenstein, so if Conjecture 2.1.17
is true, then also the F-signature s(R/ f ) is an irrational number. To see this, consider a
minimal reduction J = (v, x, y, z) of the maximal ideal m of R/ f . This reduction has the
property that m/J is a vector space of dimension 1 generated by the residue class of the
element u. This forces the equality J : m = m. Thus we have e H K (J ) − e H K (m) = s(R/ f ) by
(2.1). Since J is generated by a regular sequence and is a reduction of m, e H K (J ) = e(J ) =
e(m) the Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity, which is always an integer. Therefore we may write
e(m) − e H K (R/ f ) = s(R/ f ), which explains the claim.
Question 2.1.16 and Conjecture 2.1.17 are still open as of the writing of this chapter.
However Brenner [Bre13] exhibits an example of a ring with irrational Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity.
We conclude with the notion of generalized F-signature, introduced by Hashimoto and
Nakajima [HN15]. Following the ideas and notations of Section 1.1 we will give a definition which is more general than the one contained in [HN15].
Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian reduced F-finite local ring of characteristic p > 0 such
that k is perfect. Let C be a full subcategory of mod(R) such that C has the KRS property
and eR ∈ C for every e ∈ N. For example, if R is complete we may choose C = mod(R) by
Theorem 1.1.10. Let M be an indecomposable object in C , for each e ∈ N and q = p e we
can consider the multiplicity a q of M into eR. In other words, we can write eR = M a q ⊕N q ,
with the module N q containing no copies of M as direct summands.
Definition 2.1.19. The generalized F-signature of R with respect to M is
s(R, M ) = lim

e→+∞

aq
qd

,

provided the limit exists.
Remark 2.1.20. If the ring R has finite F-representation type, then the generalized Fsignature exists. This is a consequence of [SVB96, Proposition 3.3.1] and of [Yao05, Theorem 3.11]. Moreover, Seibert [Sei97] proved that in this situation the F-signature and
the Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity of R are rational numbers.

41

2. Signatures
Theorem 2.1.21 (Hashimoto-Nakajima). Let R = kx 1 , . . . x n G be a quotient singularity
over an algebraically closed field k of prime characteristic p. Assume that the acting group
G ⊆ GL(n, k) is a small finite group such that that (p, |G|) = 1. Let Vt be an irreducible
k-representation of G and let M t = A (Vt ) = (S ⊗k Vt )G be the corresponding R-module via
Auslander functor. Then the generalized F-signature of R with respect to M t is
s(R, M t ) =

rankR M t
.
|G|

The definition and the properties of quotient singularities and Auslander functor A
will be studied in details in Chapter 3 (e.g. see Theorem 3.5.10).
Remark 2.1.22. In the situation of Theorem 2.1.21, Smith and Van Den Bergh [SVB96,
Proposition 3.2.1] proved that R has finite F-representation type given by {M 0 , . . . , M r −1 },
where M t = A (Vt ) = (S⊗k Vt )G and {V0 , . . . ,Vr −1 } is a complete set of irreducible k-representations
of G. In other words, the R-modules M t are the only indecomposable modules appearing
in the decomposition of eR into indecomposable modules.

2.1.1. F-signature in characteristic zero
The F-signature is an intrinsic concept of rings of prime characteristic, but it would be
profitable to have an analogous invariant which is independent of the characteristic and
could be used to study singularities also in characteristic zero. The first approach that
one may think of is perhaps the following.
Let R be a reduced Z-algebra such that SpecR → SpecZ is dominant. For every prime
number p we consider the reduction mod p R p := R ⊗Z (Z/p Z) and compute the Fsignature s(R p ). One may ask whether the limit
lim s(R p )

p→+∞

exists, and use this limit to define a characteristic 0 version of the F-signature.
Despite the fact that it seems quite natural, the previous definition presents a fundamental problem. If p 1 and p 2 are two distinct prime numbers, the two Frobenius homomorphisms F p 1 : R p 1 → R p 1 and F p 2 : R p 2 → R p 2 are quite different in general, and difficult
to compare. For example we have that rankR (eR p 1 ) = p 1e , and rankR (eR p 2 ) = p 2e . So it is difficult to find an appropriate meaning to the previous limit and compute it, and even to
determine whether it exists or not.
On the other hand, results like those of Watanabe and Yoshida (Theorem 2.1.12), Singh
(Theorem 2.1.13) and Von Korff (Theorem 2.1.15) show that often the F-signature does
not depend on the characteristic, so a meaningfull extension to the characteristic zero
setting could be done, at least in these cases.
In order to give a characteristic free definition, we choose to replace the role played
by the Frobenius homomorphism with another construction which is characteristic independent, but recovers some of the properties of the Frobenius. In particular we look

42

2.2. Symmetric signature
at two of them. The first one is the famous result of Kunz [Kun69] that the Frobenius
homomorphism characterizes regularity.
Theorem 2.1.23 (Kunz). Let (R, m, k) be a reduced local ring of prime characteristic p.
Then the following facts are equivalent.
1) R is regular.
2) eR is a free R-module for all e ∈ N.
3) 1R is a free R-module.
The second property is the fact that eR is a MCM R-module, if the ring is CohenMacaulay (Remark 2.1.1).
Our idea is to use the top dimensional syzygy module of the residue field, which is
a MCM module (Proposition 1.5.16) and characterizes regularity (Corollary 1.5.17), and
apply reflexive symmetric powers (Definition 1.3.14) to obtain an asymptotic behaviour.
This leads us to the definition of symmetric signature, which will be explained in the next
section.

2.2. Symmetric signature
Keeping in mind the observations of the previous Section 2.1.1, we are going to define
the main object of interest of this thesis: the symmetric signature. We will give its definition and explain some basic properties. Further computations and examples will be
given in Chapter 4 and Chapter 5.
Let (R, m, k) be a local Noetherian domain of dimension d . We consider a minimal free
resolution of k
0 −→ SyzdR (k) −→ R βd −1 −→ · · · −→ R β1 −→ R −→ k −→ 0,
and the top-dimensional syzygy module SyzdR (k). For every natural number q, we consider the reflexive symmetric powers of the last module, for ease of notation we define
³
¢´∗∗
q¡
.
S q := SymR SyzdR (k)
The module S q will play almost the same role played by the module eR in the definition of F-signature. Here the advantage is that the construction used to define S q does
not depend explicitely from the characteristic of the ring. At the same time, S q encodes
some homological properties of the ring R through the top-dimensional syzygy module
SyzdR (k).
Definition 2.2.1. The number
PN

q
q=0 frkR S
s σ (R) := lim PN
q
N →+∞
q=0 rankR S

(2.3)

is called symmetric signature of R, provided the limit exists.

43

2. Signatures
∼ R. So one has frkR S 0 = rankR S 0 = 1, and the
We point out that for q = 0, S q = k ∗∗ =
sums in the previous limit start both from 1.
We don’t know if the limit defining the symmetric signature always exists. To obtain an
invariant which is for sure well defined and exists, one may replace the limit in (2.3) with
a limit inferior.
Moreover one may ask why should we consider the limit of (2.3), insted of the simpler
limit
frkR S q
lim
.
(2.4)
q→+∞ rankR S q
The main reason is that the limit (2.4) does not exist even in simple cases, as it will be
shown in Example 4.4.9. However, when the simpler limit (2.4) exists, then also the symmetric signature exists and they coincide, as shown by the following elementary statement.
Lemma 2.2.2. Let (a n )n∈N , (b n )n∈N be sequences of real numbers such that b n > 0 for all
P
n ∈ N. Assume that the infinite series n∈N b n diverges. Then, if the limit limn→+∞ bann
exists, then also the limit
Pn
ak
lim Pk=0
n
n→+∞
b
k=0 k
exists and the two limits coincide.
Proof: Let a := limn→+∞ bann . Then c n := bann − a converges to 0 and we have a n = (a +c n )b n
for all n. Let ε > 0, then there exists a n 0 ∈ N such that for all natural numbers n ≥ n 0 we
have |c n | ≤ ε. Then
¯ ¯ Pn
¯
¯ Pn
¯ ¯
¯
¯
¯ ¯ k=0 c k b k ¯
¯ k=0 a k
− a ¯ = ¯ Pn
¯
¯ Pn
¯ ¯
¯
b
b ¯
k=0 k
k=0 k
¯ Pn0
¯
Pn
¯
¯
¯ k=0 c k b k |c n | k=n0 +1 b k ¯
≤ ¯ Pn
+
Pn
¯
¯
¯
b
b
k=0 k
k=0 k
¯ Pn0
¯
Pn
¯
c k b k ε k=n0 +1 b k ¯¯
¯
≤ ¯ Pk=0
+ Pn
¯
n
¯
¯
b
b
k=0 k
k=0 k
¯ Pn0
¯
¯
c k b k ¯¯
¯
≤ ε + ¯ Pk=0
¯.
¯ n bk ¯
k=0
P
The last term tends to zero because the series n∈N b n diverges, so the claim follows. 2
P
Example 2.2.3. The assumption that n∈N b n diverges is necessary. Consider
an =

n
n +1
and b n = n .
n
2
2

Then limn→+∞ bann = 1, but

Pn

44

ak

1
= .
b
2
k=0 k

lim Pk=0
n

n→+∞

2.2. Symmetric signature
Remark 2.2.4. The module S q is reflexive for every q ≥ 0. If R is CM of dimension ≤ 2,
then S q is also MCM.
Example 2.2.5. If R is a regular ring of dimension d , then SyzdR (k) is a free module by
Corollary 1.5.17. Then S q is also free, therefore frkR S q = rankR S q for every q. It follows that the symmetric signature is s σ (R) = 1.
Example 2.2.6. If R has dimension 0, then is a field since it is a domain. In particular R
is regular, so by the previous Example 2.2.5 we have s σ (R) = 1.
Remark 2.2.7. If (R, m, k) has dimension 1, then the first syzygy of the residue field Syz1R (k)
is just the maximal ideal m, as explained by the following short exact sequence
0 → m → R → R/m → 0.
Since m is an ideal it has rank 1, therefore also all its symmetric powers have rank 1, and
¡
¢∗∗
q
=1
the same holds for the reflexive hull. In other words, we have rankR SymR (Syz1R (k)
for all q ∈ N. Therefore, for each q we have only two possibilities: either S q ∼
= R and
frkR S q = rankR S q = 1 or S q is not free and frkR S q = 0.
Now assume in addition that the category Ref(R) has the KRS property. We fix an indecomposable object M in Ref(R), then for every q ∈ N we have a unique decomposition
S q = M aq ⊕ Nq ,
where the module N q contains no copy of M as direct summand. The natural number
a q is called the multiplicity of M in S q .
Definition 2.2.8. The number
PN

s σ (R, M ) := lim PN
N →+∞

q=0 a q

q=0 rankR S

q

is called generalized symmetric signature of R with respect to M , provided the limit exists.
We can define the symmetric signature also for graded rings.
Let R be a standard graded Noetherian k-domain of dimension d . We work in the
category modZ (R) of finitely generated graded R-modules. In this category we consider
the graded module SyzdR (k) coming from a minimal graded free resolution of k as R¡
¢¢∗∗
q¡
module, and its reflexive symmetric powers S q := SymR SyzdR (k)
, which are again
naturally graded. The symmetric signature of R is defined by the limit
gr
q
q=0 frkR S
s σ (R) := lim PN
q
N →+∞
q=0 rankR S

PN

,

provided it exists.

45

2. Signatures
Remark 2.2.9. Notice that in the definition of s σ (R) for graded rings we consider the
graded free rank of Definition 1.1.19 instead of the free rank as in the local setting. Therefore some differences may occur. For example, one should remind that all direct summands of the form R(a) for some integer a contribute to the graded free rank part of the
module.

2.2.1. Differential symmetric signature
We present an alternative version of the symmetric signature, which is based on the reflexive hull of the differential module ΩR/k instead of the top-dimensional syzygy module
SyzdR (k). We recall briefly the definition of the module ΩR/k and some basic properties.
For a more detailed description the reader may consult [Eis94, Chapter 16].
Let R be a commutative ring, and let M be an R-module. A derivation d from R to M is
a map of abelian groups d : R → M which satisfies the Leibniz rule d( f g ) = f d(g ) + g d( f )
for all f , g ∈ R. If R is an algebra over a field k, and the derivation d is a k-linear map,
then we say that d is a k-linear derivation. A classical example is given by R = k[x] a
polynomial ring in one variable, and d : R → R the formal derivative of a polynomial.
Definition 2.2.10. Let R be an algebra over a field k. The cotangent module or the module
of Kähler differentials of R over k is denoted by ΩR/k , and is the R-module generated by
all elements of the form d f with f ∈ R subject to the relations
d( f g ) = f dg + g d f ,
d(a f + bg ) = ad f + bdg ,
for all f , g ∈ R and a, b ∈ k. The map d : R → ΩR/k defined by f 7→ d f is called the universal k-linear derivation.
The cotangent module can be also defined by the following universal property. For
any R-module M and k-linear derivation e : R → M , there exists a unique k-linear homomorphism ϕ : ΩR/k → M such that e = ϕd. In other words, we have the following
commutative diagram.
R

d

ΩR/k
e

∃! ϕ

M.
Example 2.2.11. Let R = k[x 1 , . . . , x n ] be the polynomial ring in n variables. Then ΩR/k is
the free module generated by the elements dx 1 , . . . , dx n .
Proposition 2.2.12 (Conormal Sequence). Let A be a k-algebra, let I be an ideal of A, and
let R = A/I . Then there is a natural exact sequence of R-modules
I /I 2 → Ω A/k ⊗ A R → ΩR/k → 0.

46

2.2. Symmetric signature
As a corollary to the last proposition, one obtains the remarkable fact that if R is a
finitely generated k-algebra, then ΩR/k is a finitely generated R-module.
In the local setting, the cotangent module characterizes regularity as well as the topdimensional syzygy module of the residue field does.
Theorem 2.2.13. Let (R, m, k) be a Noetherian local ring. Assume that k is perfect, and R
is a localization of a finitely generated k-algebra. Then ΩR/k is a free R-module of rank
dim R if and only if R is a regular local ring.
Proof: See [Har77, Theorem 8.8]. 2
R
Remark 2.2.14. Differently from Syzdim
(k), the cotangent module ΩR/k is not necessarR
ily maximal Cohen-Macaulay, and not even torsion-free. In fact, Herzog [Her78a] proved
that if (R, m, k) is a Noetherian local k-algebra of dimension 1 with µ(m) = 3, then the
torsion submodule of ΩR/k is not zero.

Since in general ΩR/k is not reflexive, it is convenient to work with its reflexive hull
The module Ω∗∗
is called module of Zariski (or regular) differentials of R over
R/k
k, and has been studied intensively by Auslander [Aus86b], and Martsinkovsky [Mar87],
[Mar90], [Mar92].

Ω∗∗
.
R/k

Definition 2.2.15. Let (R, m, k) be a local Noetherian k-domain of dimension d , and for
every natural number q consider the R-module
¡
¢¢∗∗
q¡
C q := SymR Ω∗∗
.
R/k

The number

PN

q
q=0 frkR C
s d σ (R) := lim PN
q
N →+∞
q=0 rankR C

is called differential symmetric signature of R, provided the limit exists.
Remark 2.2.16. If R is two-dimensional and normal, then by Lemma 1.5.23 and Remark
1.5.24 the first double dual in the definition of C q is unnecessary, that is
¡
¢¢∗∗
q¡
C q = SymR ΩR/k
.

If R is regular, ΩR/k is free by Theorem 2.2.13, hence also the module Ω∗∗
is free. It folR/k
lows that for regular rings the differential symmetric signature is 1, as for the symmetric
signature.
In the rest of the thesis, and in particular in Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 we will concentrate on the symmetric signature of Definition 2.2.1. However, we will mention each time
which results extend also to the differential symmetric signature, and which differences
may occur.

47

3. Quotient Singularites
And I’d rather play here
With all the madmen
For I’m quite content
They’re all as sane as me.
David Bowie
All The Madmen

Let G be a finite group and let A be a commutative ring. For an A-module V we denote
by GL(V ) the group of A-linear automorphisms of V . If V is free of rank n, then this group
is isomorphic to to the group of all non-singular n × n matrices over A and we denote it
also by GL(n, A).
Definition 3.0.17. An A-representation of a finite group G is a couple (V, ρ), where V
is a finitely generated A-module and ρ : G → GL(V ) is a homomorphism of groups. If
the module V is free, then the rank of V is called the dimension or the degree of the
representation.
Sometimes by abuse of notation we will call the module V the representation, but it
should more properly be called the representation module or representation space. If V
is a free A-module we may write each element of GL(V ) as a matrix, so we obtain for each
g ∈ G a matrix ρ(g ). These matrices act on the elements of V by the usual matrix-vector
multiplication, sometimes we will write g v or g (v) instead of ρ(g )(v) if the map ρ is clear.
Example 3.0.18. We take V = A and ρ(g ) = id A for all g ∈ G. This representation is called
trivial representation and it is sometimes denoted simply by A.
An important way to think about representations is in terms of group actions. In fact
an A-representation (V, ρ) of G defines an action of G on V given by
G × V → V, (g , v) 7→ ρ(g )(v).
This action is linear, in the sense that g (v 1 + v 2 ) = g v 1 + g v 2 and g (αv) = αg (v) for every
v, v 1 , v 2 ∈ V , α ∈ A, and g ∈ G. Viceversa, given a linear action ψ : G × V → V , we obtain a
representation
G → GL(V ), g 7→ ψ(g , −),
which is called the fundamental representation of the group action.

49

3. Quotient Singularites
If the homomorphism ρ is injective, then the representation is said to be faithful. In
this case one may identify the abstract group G with its image ρ(G) inside GL(V ). With
this identification in mind we will write sometimes G ⊂ GL(V ) meaning that the group is
acting on V through a faithful representation.
An important situation is when the representation module S has also the structure
of an A-algebra, and the ρ(g ) : S → S are A-algebra-homomorphisms. Then, the representation ρ : G → GL(S) induces an A-linear action on S. In particular if A = Z, then
GL(S) = Aut(S) the automorphism group of S and one recovers the classical theory of
group actions on rings. In this setting we define the invariant subring of S as
S G := {x ∈ S : g (x) = x ∀g ∈ G} ⊆ S.

Moreover if the order of the group |G| is invertible in S we can define the Reynolds operator
ρ : S → S G , ρ(s) =

1 X
g (s),
|G| g ∈G

which is a left splitting for the inclusion i : S G ,→ S, that is ρ ◦ i = idSG . It follows that S G is
a S G -direct summand of S.
If the ring S is a regular ring, then the invariant ring S G is called quotient singularity. The main goal of this chapter is to recall some fundamental facts and properties
of quotient singularities. In particular we will review and prove the so-called Auslander
correspondence (Theorem 3.5.10). This states that, under certain assumptions, there is
a one-one correspondence between representations of G and MCM S G -modules. It follows that the study of the invariant ring S G and its modules is deeply connected with the
study of the representations of the group G.
We will procede as follows. In Sections 3.1 and 3.2 we will review some basic facts concerning finite group representations over a field and their characters. In Section 3.3 we
will introduce the skew group ring, which is a twisted version of the classical group ring,
and is necessary to construct the Auslander correspondence. The latter will be the main
object of study in Section 3.4. There, we will work over a Noetherian normal local domain equipped with a group action and we will explicitely construct a functor between
the category of group representations and the category of reflexive modules over the invariant ring, using modules over the skew group ring as an intermediate step. Finally
in Section 3.5 we will apply this correspondence to the quotient singularites and we will
also present other important results on quotient singularites.
We claim no originality for the results of this chapter. However the theorems of Section
3.4 are stated and proved for a normal Noetherian local ring, instead of a power series
ring as it is classically done in the literature ([Yos90, Chapter 10] and [LW12, Chapter 5]).

50

3.1. Representation theory of finite groups

3.1. Representation theory of finite groups
We consider a finite group G and we work over an arbitrary field k. Many definitions
and results from this section can be extended to representations over any (not necessarily
commutative) ring A. However for our purpose representations over a field are enough,
so we restrict already to this situation to avoid many complications.
We will skip proofs of the main results of this section and the following Section 3.2.
The interested reader may consult the books of Etingof et al. [EGHLSVY11], Feit [Fei82],
Fulton and Harris [FH91] (for representations over C), and Serre [Ser77], or the notes of
Webb [Web14].
We begin with some definitions.
Definition 3.1.1. Let (V, ρ) be a k-representation. A subspace W of V is said to be stable
under G or a G-invariant subspace of V if g w ∈ W for all w ∈ W and g ∈ G. Such an
invariant submodule W gives rise to a representation ρW : G → GL(W ), which is called a
subrepresentation of V . A representation whose unique G-invariant subspaces are 0 and
V itself is called irreducible.
Remark 3.1.2. One should not confuse a G-invariant subspace W of V with the subspace
of fixed points V G = {v ∈ V : g v = v ∀g ∈ G}.
Definition 3.1.3. A G-linear map between two representations (V, ρ) and (W, ρ 0 ) is a klinear homomorphism V → W such that the diagram
V −−−−→ W




ρ(g )y
ρ 0 (g )y
V −−−−→ W
commutes for every g ∈ G. We denote the space of G-linear maps between V and W
by HomG (V,W ). Two representations V and W are said to be equivalent or isomorphic
if there exists ϕ ∈ HomG (V,W ) bijective. In particular ϕ is an isomorphism of vector
spaces, so two equivalent representations have the same dimension.
Given two representations V and W we can construct the following representations:
• the direct sum V ⊕ W , with action g (v + w) = g v + g w for g ∈ G, v, w ∈ V ;
• the tensor product V ⊗k W , with action g (v ⊗ w) = g v ⊗ g w for g ∈ G, v, w ∈ V ;
• the homomorphism representation Homk (V,W ), with action g f (v) = f (g −1 v) for
g ∈ G, v ∈ W and f : V → W k-linear. In particular the representation V ∗ = Homk (V, k)
is called dual representation of V .
With the same rule, if V is a representation then the n-th tensor product V ⊗n is again
V
a representation and the exterior powers n V and the symmetric powers Symn (V )are
subrepresentations of it.

51

3. Quotient Singularites
It is not hard to see that the G-linear maps between two representations V and W
coincide with the fixed subspace of Homk (V,W ), that is
HomG (V,W ) = Homk (V,W )G .
Example 3.1.4. Let X be a finite set with an action of G, then we associate a representation to this action. Let V be a vector space with basis {e x : x ∈ X }. G acts naturally on this
basis by g e x = e g x , and we can extend the action to V by linearity. The representation
associated with this action is called permutation representation. When X = G the group
itself, it is also called regular representation. The regular representation plays a key role
in the study of irreducible representations.
Another important way to look at representations is in terms of the group algebra k[G].
In fact every statement about the representations of G can be rephrased in terms of the
group algebra.
Definition 3.1.5. The group algebra or group ring of G over k is denoted by k[G] (or kG)
and is the k-vector space with basis {e g : g ∈ G} and with multiplication given on the basis
elements by group multiplication e g e h = e g h and extended linearly to arbitrary elements.
P
P
More explicitely given g ∈G a g e g and g ∈G b g e g , where a g and b g are elements of k
we have
Ã
!Ã
!
Ã
!
X
X
X X
ag e g
bg e g =
a f bh e g .
g ∈G

g ∈G

g ∈G f h=g

The group algebra is commutative if and only if the group G is abelian. So when we speak
of k[G] modules we will always mean left k[G]-module.
Proposition 3.1.6. We have a one-one correspondence between the following objects:
1. k-representations of G;
2. finitely generated k[G]-modules.
Moreover the dimension of a representation is equal to the k-dimension of the corresponding k[G]-module.
Proof: Given a k-representation (V, ρ) of G we define a k[G]-module action on V by
e g · v = ρ(g )(v) for every g ∈ G, v ∈ V and we extend by linearity.
Conversely given a k[G]-module V , then for every g ∈ G the multiplication by the basis
element e g is a k-linear map ρ g : V → V . Since ρ g ρ h = ρ g h we obtain a representation
ρ : G → GL(V ). The statement on the dimension is clear. 2
Remark 3.1.7. The k[G]-module k[G] corresponds to the regular representation from
Example 3.1.4.

52

3.1. Representation theory of finite groups
We can translate the definitions we have given so far in the language of module theory.
So a G-linear map between representations is just a homomorphism of k[G]-modules,
that is
Homk[G] (V,W ) = HomG (V,W ).
Similarly, a subrepresentation is nothing but a k[G]-submodule and irreducible representations correspond to simple k[G]-modules. In fact we have an equivalence of categories between the category mod(k[G]) of k[G]-modules and the category of representations, whose object are representations and whose morphisms are the G-linear maps.
Keeping in mind this identification we will use indifferently the language of representations or the language of k[G]-modules.
When the characteristic of the field k does not divide the order of the group we say
that G is non-modular over k. In particular this happens if k has characteristic 0. The
structure of the representations of G is quite nice in the non-modular case, in fact every
representation is isomorphic to a direct sum of irreducible ones. In other words, the
category mod(k[G]) has the KRS property. This fact is a consequence of the Theorem of
Maschke, which ensures the existence of a decomposition, and of Schur’s Lemma, which
provides the unicity of such a decomposition.
Theorem 3.1.8 (Maschke). Let k be a field and let G be a finite group such that |G| is
invertible in k. Let V be a representation of G and let W be an invariant subspace of V .
Then there exists an invariant subspace W1 of G such that V = W ⊕ W1 as representations.
Using the language of k[G]-modules, Maschke’s Theorem affirms that in the non-modular
case the group algebra k[G] is semisimple, which means that it can be written as direct
sum of simple modules.
Lemma 3.1.9 (Schur). Let G be a finite group, let k be field, let V and W be two irreducible
k-representations of G and let ϕ : V → W be a G-linear homomorphism. Then the following facts hold.
1) Either ϕ is an isomorphism or ϕ = 0.
2) If V = W and k is algebraically closed, then ϕ = λ·idV for some λ ∈ k, i.e. HomG (V,V ) ∼
=
k.
In many results that will follow we will make the assumption that k is algebraically
closed to make sure that the second condition of Schur’s Lemma holds. Sometimes this
is a significant point, but most of the times this is just a convenience to simplify the
statements so that numbers such as dimk HomG (V,V ) do not occur.
Corollary 3.1.10. Let k be a field, let G be a finite group such that |G| is invertible in k and
let V be a representation of G. Then there is a unique decomposition
a

a

V = V1 1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ Vmm ,

53

3. Quotient Singularites
where the Vi ’s are distinct irreducible representations and the a i ’s are natural numbers. In
other words the category mod(k[G]) has the KRS property and its indecomposable objects
are precisely the irreducible representations.
Remark 3.1.11. Maschke’s Theorem and Corollary 3.1.10 are not true in the modular
case (if chark divides |G|). In this case, it turns out that indecomposable objects and
irreducible representations do not coincide. In other words, k[G]-modules no longer
need to be semisimple, that is direct sums of simple modules.
Another consequence of Schur’s Lemma is that irreducible representations of an abelian
group are one-dimensional.
Corollary 3.1.12. Let k be an algebraically closed field and G an abelian finite group. Then
every irreducible k-representation is one-dimensional.
Proof: Let ρ : G → GL(V ) be an irreducible k-representation. Let g ∈ G, then the linear
map ρ(g ) : V → V is G-linear. In fact given h ∈ G we have ρ(g )ρ(h) = ρ(g h) = ρ(hg ) =
ρ(h)ρ(g ), since G is abelian. Then by Schur’s Lemma ρ(g ) = λg idV for some λg ∈ k. Thus
every linear subspace of V is G-invariant, which forces V to be one-dimensional. 2
The important role of the regular representation is expressed in the following Theorem 3.1.13. It says that the regular representation contains at least one copy of every
irreducible representation. As a consequence, there exists only a finite number of irreducible representations.
Theorem 3.1.13. Let k be a field and G a finite group such that |G| is invertible in k. Let
k[G] be the regular representation of G then
n

n

k[G] ∼
= V1 1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ Vr r ,
where the Vi are pairwise non-isomorphic simple k[G]-modules. Moreover we have that
V1 , . . . ,Vr are a complete set of representatives of the isomorphism classes of simple k[G]modules.
If k is algebraically closed, then
n i = dimk Vi , |G| = dimk k[G] = n 12 + · · · + n r2 ,
and r is equal to the number of conjugacy classes of G.
The previous theorem provides a good numerical criterion to determine when we have
constructed all the irreducible k-representations of a group G. However one would still
like to solve the following problem: given a representation V , how can one decompose
V as a direct sum of irreducible representations? In the next section we will see that
character theory provides a great tool to solve this question in many cases.

54

3.2. Character theory
Example 3.1.14. Let C n be the cyclic group of order n ≥ 1, with generator g . We wix a
primitive n-th root of unity ξ in the field k. Assume that chark does not divide n, then
the irreducible k-representations of C n are one-dimensional and given by
ρ j (g ) = ξ j , for j = 0, 1, . . . , n − 1.
Example 3.1.15. We consider the binary dihedral group B D 2 given by the presentation
B D 2 =< a, b : a 4 = e, b 2 = a 2 , bab −1 = a −1 >,
where e is the identity. This group has 8 elements and 5 conjugacy classes. The terminology B D 2 and the name binary dihedral group will be explained in Chapter 4. It is also
called quaternion group, in fact it may be identified with the group of the quaternion
units {±1, ±i , ± j , ±k}. One may take, for instance, i = a, j = b, k = ab.
We look for the 5 irreducible representations of B D 2 over C of dimensions n 0 , . . . , n 4 .
For sure we have the trivial representation (V0 , ρ 0 ), then from Theorem 3.1.13 we have
8 = 1 + n 12 + n 22 + n 32 + n 42 .
The only solution in positive integers, up to permutation, is given by n 2 = n 3 = n 4 = 1
and n 1 = 2. A small search shows that the irreducible one-dimensional representations
(V j , ρ j ) are given by
ρ 0 (a) = 1, ρ 0 (b) = 1;
ρ 2 (a) = 1, ρ 2 (b) = −1;
ρ 3 (a) = −1, ρ 3 (b) = 1;
ρ 4 (a) = −1, ρ 4 (b) = −1.
The two-dimensional irreducible representation (V1 , ρ 1 ) is
¶
¶
µ
0 i
i 0
.
, ρ 1 (b) =
ρ 1 (a) =
0 −i
i 0
µ

3.2. Character theory
As remarked in the previous section, characters are an important tool for handling the
irreducible representations of a group. We will work with Brauer characters, that may
be defined over any algebraically closed field. They are very important to understand
representations of a group in the modular situation. However we are only interested in
the non-modular case, and in this situation Brauer characters satisfy almost the same
properties of ordinary characters, that is characters over C.
Let G be a finite group of order n and let k be an algebraically closed field such that
chark does not divide n. Let µn (k) be the group of n-th roots of unity in k and let µn (C)

55

3. Quotient Singularites
be the group of complex n-th roots of unity. Both µn (k) and µn (C) are cyclic of groups of
order n, so we can fix an isomorphism
φ : µn (k) → µn (C),
which we name a lift. In the same way, we say that a complex root of unity z ∈ µn (C) is a
lift of a ∈ µn (k) if z = φ(a).
Let (V, ρ) be a k-representation of G of dimension r ≥ 1 and let g be an element of
G. Then the matrix ρ(g ) has r eigenvalues in k and in particular they are elements of
µn (k), since the order of g divides n. Let λ1 , . . . , λr be these eigenvalues, counted with
multiplicity.
Definition 3.2.1. The Brauer character or simply the character of (V, ρ) is the function
χ : G → C given by
χV (g ) = φ(λ1 ) + · · · + φ(λr ).
This definition depend on the choice of the isomorphism φ. Since there are in general
many choices for φ, we have a certain degree of arbitrariness. In fact, some of the definitions and results below may depend on the choice of φ. However once chosen φ, it
will never be changed and sometimes we will simply say that we lift the eigenvalues to
C, meaning that the isomorphism φ is fixed. The reader should be aware of this fact and
not be confused.
Remark 3.2.2. If k = C, then we take φ as the identity map µn (C) → µn (C). So the character χ of a C-representation (V, ρ) can be written as
χ(g ) = λ1 + · · · + λr = Trρ(g ),
the trace of the matrix ρ(g ). These characters over C are called ordinary characters.
Example 3.2.3. Let k = F2 and let G be the cyclic group of order 3. We consider the
representation (V, ρ) of G given by
µ

¶
0 1
ρ(g ) =
,
1 1

where g is a generator of G. The characteristic polynomial of ρ(g ) is t 2 + t + 1 (recall that
we are in characteristic 2), and its roots are the primitive cube roots of unity in k. These
4πi
lift to exp( 2πi
3 ) and exp( 3 ), the primitive third roots of unity in C. Therefore the Brauer
character of (V, ρ) is
µ
¶
µ
¶
2πi
4πi
χ(g ) = exp
+ exp
= −1.
3
3
Notice that the trace of the matrix ρ(g ) is 1, which can be lifted to 1 ∈ C. However this
does not give the correct Brauer character of (V, ρ).

56

3.2. Character theory
Proposition 3.2.4. Let V and W be k-representations of G with characters χV and χW .
Then the following facts hold:
1. χV (e) = dimk V , where e is the identity of G;
2. χV (g −1 ) = χV (g ), the complex conjugate of χV (g ), for every g ∈ G;
3. χV (hg h −1 ) = χV (g ) for every g , h ∈ G;
4. χV ⊕W (g ) = χV (g ) + χW (g ) for every g ∈ G;
5. χV ⊗W (g ) = χV (g ) · χW (g ) for every g ∈ G.

Since the character of the direct sum of two representations is the sum of the characters, it is important to know the characters of the irreducible representations. Moreover
characters are constant on conjugacy class, so to determine a character it is sufficient to
know its values on conjugacy classes.
These observations suggest to construct a table containing these fundamental data.
This is called character table and is build as follows. In the top row we list the conjugacy
classes of G, usually taking a representative from each class, and in the second row we
write the number of elements of each class. Sometimes in the third row we may write also
the order of the elements in the class. Then the rows are labelled by the irreducible representations of G and in each entry of the table we write the value of the corresponding
character on the conjugacy class.

Example 3.2.5. We consider the cyclic group C n of order n ≥ 1 with generator g and we
fix a primitive n-th root of unity ξ ∈ k as in Example 3.1.14. Furthermore we consider
¡ ¢
a lifting φ(ξ) = w := exp 2πi
n . Then the character χ j of the irreducible representation
j
ρ j (g ) = ξ is given by χ j (g ) = w j . With this information one can easily write the character
table of C n . For example for n = 3 we have

representative
| class |

e
1

g
1

g2
1

trivial ρ 0
ρ1
ρ2

1
1
1

1
w
w2

1
w2
w

Example 3.2.6. We consider the binary dihedral group B D 2 of Example 3.1.15. Its character table over C is given by

57

3. Quotient Singularites
representative
| class |

e
1

a2
1

a
2

b
2

ab
2

ρ0
ρ1
ρ2
ρ3
ρ4

1
2
1
1
1

1
−2
1
1
1

1
0
1
−1
−1

1
0
−1
1
−1

1
0
−1
−1
1

Remark 3.2.7. Notice that the first row of the character table, which corresponds to the
trivial representation, consists of 1’s. On the other hand, in the first column one can read
the dimensions of the irreducible representations.
We consider the set Cclass (G) of class functions on G. These are the functions G → C
which are constant on conjugacy classes. It follows from Proposition 3.2.4 that characters
are class functions. The set Cclass (G) equipped with pointwise sum and multiplication is
a C-algebra, isomorphic to Cr , where r is the number of conjugacy classes of G.
We define an Hermitian inner product on Cclass (G) by
〈ϕ, ψ〉 :=

1 X
ϕ(g )ψ(g ),
|G| g ∈G

for every ϕ, ψ ∈ Cclass (G). This bilinear form satisfies
〈χϕ, ψ〉 = 〈χ, ϕ∗ ψ〉,
where ϕ∗ (g ) = ϕ(g ) is the class function obtained by complex conjugation.
Remark 3.2.8. If we restrict the bilinear form to characters, it is easy to check that
〈χ, ψ〉 =

1 X
χ(g )ϕ(g ) = 〈ψ, χ〉,
|G| g ∈G

for every χ, ψ characters.
The characters of the irreducible representations of G are orthonormal with respect to
this inner product. In fact we have the following theorem.
Theorem 3.2.9. Let G be a finite group and let k be an algebraically closed field such that
chark does not divide |G|. Then the following facts hold.
1. A representation V over k is irreducible if and only if 〈χV , χV 〉 = 1.
2. If χ and ψ are the characters of two non-isomorphic irreducible k-representations
then 〈χ, ψ〉 = 0.

58

3.3. Skew group ring
Corollary 3.2.10. Let k and G be as in Theorem 3.2.9. Let V be a k-representation of G
and let
n
n
V = V1 1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ Vr r
be its decomposition into irreducible representations Vi . If χV is the character of V and χVi
is the character of Vi then
n i = 〈χV , χVi 〉.
In particular, two representations are isomorphic if and only if they have the same character.
Example 3.2.11. The orthonormality of the irreducible representations of the groups C 3
and B D 2 can be read from their character tables in Example 3.2.5 and Example 3.2.6. The
numbers over each conjugacy class tell how many times to count entries in that column.
Remark 3.2.12. In the modular case, when chark divides |G|, the orthonormal relations
of Theorem 3.2.9 are no longer true. In this setting, Brauer characters can be defined
only for p-regular elements, that is elements whose order is not an integer multiple of
p = chark. However one can still use Brauer characters to investigate the representations
of the group, and obtain similar results.

3.3. Skew group ring
Now we come back to group actions on rings to investigate the relation between group
representations and modules over the invariant ring. As an intermediate step in this
correspondence it is convenient to consider modules over the skew group ring, which is
a twisted version of the ordinary group ring.
Definition 3.3.1. Let S be a (not necessarily commutative) ring and let G a finite subgroup of Aut(S) such that |G| is invertible in S. The skew group ring of G and S is denoted
by S ∗ G and it is
M
• S ∗G =
Sg , as S-module it is free on the elements of G;
g ∈G

• the multiplication is given by (sg )(t h) := sg (t ) · g h for all s, t ∈ S, g , h ∈ G.
Like the ordinary group ring, also the skew group ring is in general non-commutative,
even if S is commutative. So, by an S ∗ G-module M we will always mean a left S ∗ Gmodule. According to the previous definition, this is just an S-module with a compatible
action of G: g (sm) = g (s)g (m) for all g ∈ G, s ∈ S and m ∈ M . The ring S is clearly an
S ∗ G-module, but not every S-module has a natural S ∗ G-module structure.
Given two S ∗G-modules M and N , an S ∗G-module homomorphism ϕ : M → N is an
S-module homomorphism respecting the action of G, that is ϕ(g (m)) = g (ϕ(m)) for all
m ∈ M and g ∈ G. As for the group ring, also in this case it turns out that the S ∗G-module

59

3. Quotient Singularites
homomorphisms are just the S-module homomorphisms that are invariant under the
action of G. First, we define an S ∗ G-module structure on HomS (M , N ) by g (ϕ) := g ◦
ϕ ◦ g −1 for all ϕ ∈ HomS (M , N ), g ∈ G. In other words the action of G is expressed by the
following commutative diagram
ϕ

M −−−−→ N
x



gy
g −1 
g (ϕ)

M −−−−→ N .
Proposition 3.3.2. Let M and N be S ∗ G-modules. Then
HomS∗G (M , N ) = HomS (M , N )G
Proof: Let ϕ ∈ HomS (M , N ). If ϕ is S ∗ G-linear then for every m ∈ M and every g ∈ G we
have ϕ(g (m)) = g (ϕ(m)). In particular g (ϕ)(m) = g (ϕ(g −1 (m)) = g g −1 ϕ(m) = ϕ(m), so ϕ
is G-invariant.
Viceversa let ϕ be G-invariant, then g (ϕ)(m) = ϕ(m) for all m ∈ M and g ∈ G, that is
g (ϕ(g −1 (m))) = ϕ(m). Applying g −1 we get ϕ(g −1 (m)) = g −1 ϕ(m). 2
Also the tensor product M ⊗S N of two S ∗G-modules M and N has a natural structure
of S ∗ G-module. This is given by g (m ⊗ n) = g (m) ⊗ g (n).
ϕ

ψ

Lemma 3.3.3. Let 0 → M −
→N −
→ L → 0 be an exact sequence of S ∗ G-modules. Then the
sequence
ϕ

ψ

→ NG −
→ LG → 0
0 → MG −
is exact.
Proof: Clearly ϕ is injective since it is a restriction of an injective map. We prove that ψ
is surjective.
Let ` ∈ LG , since ψ is surjective there exists n ∈ N such that ψ(n) = `. The order of G is
invertible in S, so we consider the Reynolds operator and the element
ñ :=

1 X
g (n) ∈ N G .
|G| g ∈G

Then by S ∗ G-linearity of ψ we have
ψ(ñ) =ψ(ñ)
1 X
=
ψ(g (n))
|G| g ∈G
1 X
=
g (ψ(n))
|G| g ∈G
1 X
=
` = `.
|G| g ∈G

60

3.3. Skew group ring
The fact that Imϕ = kerψ follows by a similar argument. 2
We immediately get two corollaries.
Corollary 3.3.4. Let M and N be S ∗ G-modules. Then for every i ∈ N we have
ExtiS∗G (M , N ) = ExtiS (M , N )G .
Corollary 3.3.5. Let M be an S ∗G-module. Then the following facts are are equivalent.
• M is projective as S ∗ G-module.
• M is projective as S-module.
Proof: If M is S-projective then ExtiS (M , N ) = 0 for all i > 0 and for every S-module N . In
particular if N is an S ∗G-module then ExtiS (M , N ) = 0 and also the invariant submodule
ExtiS (M , N )G = 0 and this coincides with ExtiS∗G (M , N ) by Corollary 3.3.4. So M is S ∗ Gprojective.
Viceversa let M be S ∗G-projective, then M is a direct summand of a free S ∗G-module
F . Then F is also S-free, so M is a direct summand of a free S-module, hence it is Sprojective. 2
Projective S ∗ G-modules have a special role. In fact we will see in Section 3.4 that
when the ring S is a normal Noetherian local commutative domain over an algebraically
closed field k, then projective S ∗ G-modules correspond to k[G]-modules, the group
representations.
Remark 3.3.6. The ring S can be embedded into S ∗G in two different ways:
• S ,→ S ∗ G, s 7→ s · 1G ;
1 P
• S ,→ S ∗G via Reynolds operator, s 7→ ρ̃(s) := |G|
g ∈G g (s)g . The homomorphism ρ̃
is injective and its image coincide with the fixed points of S ∗ G, namely
S∼
= ρ̃(S) = (S ∗ G)G .
From now on we will identify S with its image ρ̃(S) inside S ∗ G.
Every element of the skew group ring S ∗ G can be viewed as a morphism S → S, in
particular this morphism is clearly R-linear, where R = S G . In fact we obtain a map
γ : S ∗ G → EndR (S)
sg 7→ γ(sg ),
such that γ(sg )(t ) := sg (t ) for every t ∈ S. The map γ is a ring homomorphism which
extends the group homomorphism G → Aut(S) that defines the action of G on S.
Even though the map G → Aut(S) is injective (if the group action is faithful), the map
γ is neither injective nor surjective in general. However Auslander [Aus62] found a sufficient condition for the homomorphism γ to be bijective.

61

3. Quotient Singularites
Definition 3.3.7. Let (A, m, K ) ⊆ (B, n, L) be an extension of commutative Noetherian local rings with m = n ∩ A such that B is finitely generated as an A-algebra. The extension
A ⊆ B is called unramified if n = mB and K ⊆ L is a separable extension of fields.
Definition 3.3.8. Let ϕ : A ,→ B be a ring extension, we say that ϕ is unramified in codimension one if ϕ is essentially of finite type and for every prime ideal p of height one in
B the extension A p∩A → B p is unramified.
Theorem 3.3.9 (Auslander). Let (S, m) be a normal commutative local domain and let G
be a finite subgroup of Aut(S) such that |G| is invertible in S. Let R = S G be the invariant
ring and assume that the inclusion R ,→ S is unramified in codimension one. Then the
ring homomorphism γ : S ∗ G → EndR (S) given by γ(sg )(t ) := sg (t ) is an isomorphism.
In addition to the original paper of Auslander [Aus62], the reader may find a proof of
Theorem 3.3.9 also in the article of Iyama and Takahashi [IT13, Proposition 4.2], or in
Yoshino’s book [Yos90, Lemma 10.8] for the two-dimensional case.

3.4. The Auslander correspondence
We come now to the heart of the chapter: the proof of the Auslander correspondence
between group representations and modules over the invariant ring. This result was first
proved by Auslander in his remarkable paper [Aus86b]. Auslander worked over a power
series ring in two variables over an algebraically closed field and proved Theorem 3.4.18
below in this setting. His results can be generalized to an n-dimensional power series
ring S, as shown in [LW12, Chapter 5]. However one has to pay a little price for this,
namely the equivalence between reflexive modules over the invariant ring R and R-direct
summands of S of Theorem 3.4.19 is no longer true if n > 2.
We will relax further these hypothesis, and require our ring S to be normal, but not
necessarily regular. More precisely, we fix the following setting for this section. The condition that the extension R ,→ S is unramified in codimension one is justified by Theorem
3.3.9 above.
Situation 3.1. Let k be an algebraically closed field and let S be a local Noetherian normal commutative k-domain with maximal ideal m such that S/m = k. Let G be a finite
subgroup of Autk (S), the k-linear algebra-automorphisms of S, such that |G| is invertible in k and let R := S G be the invariant ring. We assume that the extension R ,→ S is
unramified in codimension one.
Before proceeding with the Auslander correspondence, in the next theorem we collect
some classical results from invariant theory, which will be useful later on. Its proof is
taken mainly from [BD08, Theorem 4.1].
Theorem 3.4.1. Let (S, m) be a Noetherian local normal commutative domain. Let G be a
finite group acting on S such that |G| is invertible in S and let R = S G be the invariant ring.
Then the following facts hold.

62

3.4. The Auslander correspondence
1) R is a Noetherian local domain.
2) The extension R ,→ S is integral, in particular R is normal of Krull dimension dim R =
dim S.
3) If S is Cohen-Macaulay then R is Cohen-Macaulay.
4) If S is complete then R is complete.
5) S is a finitely generated R-module of rank |G|.
Proof: 1) The fact that R is a domain is obvious. We show that R is local with maximal
ideal n := m ∩ R. Let x ∈ R \ n, then x ∉ m so x is invertible in S. Its inverse x −1 is clearly
G-invariant, so x −1 ∈ R and x is invertible in R. It follows that n is the unique maximal
ideal of R.
To prove that R is Noetherian it is sufficient to prove the following claim: for every ideal
I in R we have (I S) ∩ R = I . In fact, for any chain of ideals in R
I1 ⊆ I2 ⊆ · · · ⊆ In ⊆ · · · ⊆ R

(3.1)

we have an induced chain of ideals in S: I 1 S ⊆ I 2 S ⊆ · · · ⊆ I n S ⊆ · · · ⊆ S. Since S is Noetherian this chain is stationary, that is there exists a natural number c such that I n S = I m S
for all n, m ≥ c. The claim implies that I m = (I m S) ∩ R = (I n S) ∩ R = I n , so the chain (3.1)
is stationary too and R is Noetherian.
Now we prove the claim. The inclusion I ⊆ (I S) ∩ R is clear. Let x ∈ (I S) ∩ R, so x =
Pm
i =1 x i r i with x i ∈ I and r i ∈ S. Then we have:
|G|x =

X
g ∈G

where r¯i =

1 P
|G| g ∈G

g (x) =

m X
X

g (x i r i ) = |G|

i =1 g ∈G

m
X
i =1

xi

m
X
1 X
x i r¯i ,
g (r i ) = |G|
|G| g ∈G
i =1

Pm

¯ ∈ I , so I = (I S) ∩ R.
Q
2) Let a ∈ S and consider the monic polynomial p(X ) := g ∈G (X − ag ). It is easy to
check that the coefficients of p are G-invariants, hence elements of R, and that p(a) = 0.
It follows that S is integral over R and therefore dim R = dim S.
g (r i ) ∈ R. Hence, x =

i =1 x i r i

Now we prove that R is normal, that is R is integrally closed in its field of fractions Q(R).
First we observe that since |G| is invertible in S we have Q(R) = Q(S)G . Let q ∈ Q(R) be
integral over R. Then q is also integral over S, which is normal, so q ∈ S. Since Q(R) ∩ S =
Q(S)G ∩ S = S G = R we obtain that q ∈ R, so R is normal.
3) Since |G| is invertible in S, the Reynolds operator gives a splitting for the inclusion
R ,→ S, as shown in the proof of 1). Then R is a direct summand of a Cohen-Macaulay
ring, so it is Cohen-Macaulay too.
4) We know that R is local with maximal ideal n = m ∩ R. Let (a n )n≥1 be a Cauchy
sequence of elements of R with respect to the n-adic topology. Since S is complete, there
exists a unique element a ∈ S such that a ∼
= a n mod ml for all n bigger or equal than
certain natural number Nl . Since for all g ∈ G we have g (a n ) = a n , for n ≥ Nl we get
a − g (a) = a − g (a) + a n − g (a n ) = a − a n − g (a − a n ) ∈ ml .

63

3. Quotient Singularites
By Krull’s intersection theorem
plete.

l
l ≥1 m

T

= 0, therefore a = g (a), so a ∈ R and R is com-

5) We have already seen that S is integral over R, this implies that S is finitely generated
as R-module. For the rank consider the following commutative diagram
R

S

Q(R) = Q(S)G

Q(S).

Then we have
rankR S = dimQ(R) Q(R) ⊗R S
= dimQ(S)G Q(S)
= [Q(S) : Q(S)G ]
= |G|,
since G is the Galois group of the field extension Q(S)G ,→ Q(S). 2
Remark 3.4.2. The condition that |G| is invertible in S is necessary, otherwise the ring
could be not Noetherian or not Cohen-Macaulay. Nagata [Nag65] constructed an example of a non Noetherian invariant ring under the action of a group G on a regular ring S
with |G| non invertible in S. Fogarty [Fog81] gave an example of a finite group acting on
a Cohen-Macaulay ring S such that the ring of invariants is not Cohen-Macaulay, but it
is Noetherian.

3.4.1. The functor F
Now assume the setting of Situation 3.1. The first step in the construction of the Auslander correspondence is to establish a relation between modules over the group ring
k[G] and modules over the skew group ring S∗G. It turns out that the category mod(S∗G)
is too big in general, so one should rather look at proj(S ∗G), the category of finitely generated projective S ∗ G-modules.
We recall that by Corollary 3.3.5 an S ∗ G-module is S ∗ G-projective if and only if it is
projective as S-module, which is equivalent to be S-free, since S is local (Theorem 1.4.4).
In particular, it follows that HomS (P,Q) and P ⊗S Q are S ∗ G-projective if P and Q are
S ∗ G-projective.
We define two functors. First, consider
F : mod(k[G]) → proj(S ∗ G)
V 7→ S ⊗k V ∼
= S ⊗k k dimk V
(ϕ : V → W ) 7→ idS ⊗ ϕ,

64

3.4. The Auslander correspondence
where idS is the identity map on S. The S ∗ G-module structure on S ⊗k V is given by
diagonal action
sg (t ⊗ v) = (sg (t )) ⊗ g (v).
Moreover we observe that sg (idS ⊗ ϕ) = s · idS ⊗ g (ϕ) for all g ∈ G, s, t ∈ S, v ∈ V , and that
the module S ⊗k V is S ∗ G-projective, since it is clearly S-free. It follows that the functor
F is well defined.
Furthermore we define
F 0 : proj(S ∗ G) → mod(k[G])
P 7→ P ⊗S k ∼
= P /mP
(ψ : P → Q) 7→ ψ mod m.
The quotient P /mP is a finite-dimensional k-vector space with a linear action of G, so it
is a k[G]-module. In particular, we point out that the image of the skew group ring is the
ordinary group ring, that is F 0 (S ∗ G) = (S ∗ G) ⊗S k ∼
= k[G].
Proposition 3.4.3. The functors F and F 0 form an adjoint pair, that is
Homk[G] (F 0 (P ),V ) = HomS∗G (P, F (V ))
and they are inverses of each other on objects.
Proof: Let V be a k[G]-module, then we have
F 0 F (V ) = (S ⊗k V ) ⊗S k ∼
= k ⊗k V ∼
= V.
We prove that the other composition is also the identity. We denote by π : S → k the
canonical projection modulo m. Let P be a projective S∗G-module and consider F (F 0 (P )) =
S ⊗k P /mP , which is also a projective S ∗ G-module. We have the following diagram
P /mP

P

0

ϕ

S ⊗k P /mP
where the vertical map is given by π⊗idP /mP and the existence of the map ϕ is guaranteed
by the fact that S ⊗k P /mP is projective.
We claim that ϕ is surjective. To prove the claim, consider the following commutative
diagram with exact rows
S ⊗k P /mP
π⊗idP /mP

P /mP

ϕ

P

P /Imϕ

0

π0

P /mP

0,

65

3. Quotient Singularites
where π0 : P → P /mP is the projection modulo m. The map P /mP → P /mP is surjective,
then by Nakayama’s Lemma also its lifting ϕ is surjective. Since P is projective, the map
ϕ splits. In particular P is a direct summand of S ⊗k P /mP . Swapping the role of the two
modules we get that S ⊗k P /mP is a direct summand of P , hence we have the required
isomorphism S ⊗k P /mP ∼
= P. 2
Remark 3.4.4. Note that the categories proj(S ∗G) and mod(k[G]) are not equivalent. In
fact Hom-sets in mod(k[G]) are k-vector spaces, but this is not true in proj(S ∗ G).
Corollary 3.4.5. Let S and G be as in Situation 3.1. Then the following facts hold.
1) The category proj(S ∗ G) has the Krull-Remak-Schmidt property.
2) Let V0 ,V1 , . . . ,Vr be a complete set of non-isomorphic simple k[G]-modules and let P i :=
F (Vi ). Then P 0 , P 1 , . . . , P r is a complete set of non-isomorphic indecomposable finitely
generated projective S ∗ G-modules.
The fact that proj(S ∗ G) is a Krull-Schmidt category allows us to give the following
useful characterization.
Lemma 3.4.6. The finitely generated indecomposable projective S ∗G-modules are exactly
the indecomposable S ∗ G-direct summands of S ∗ G.
Proof: The S ∗ G-summands of S ∗ G are clearly projective. Conversely, let P be an indecomposable object in proj(S∗G), then P is a direct summand of a finite free S∗G-module,
that is P ⊕ M = (S ∗ G)n for some S ∗ G-module M . Since P is indecomposable and the
category proj(S ∗ G) has the KRS property, P must be a direct summand of S ∗ G as well,
which concludes the proof. 2
Proposition 3.4.7. Let V and W be two objects in mod(k[G]). Then the following facts
hold.
∼ HomS (F (V ), F (W )).
1) F (Homk (V,W )) =
∼
2) F (V ⊗k W ) = F (V ) ⊗S F (W ).
3) rankS F (V ) = dimk V .
Proof: 1) Consider HomS (F (V ), F (W )), the Hom-tensor adjunction formula yields
HomS (S ⊗k V, S ⊗k W ) ∼
= Homk (V, HomS (S, S ⊗k W )).
It follows that Homk (V, HomS (S, S ⊗k W )) ∼
= Homk (V, S ⊗k W ), and this is isomorphic to
Homk (V,W ) ⊗k S.
2) From ordinary properties of tensor product we have
F (V ⊗k W ) = S ⊗k (V ⊗k W ) ∼
= S ⊗k V ⊗S S ⊗k W = F (V ) ⊗S F (W ),
and it is easy to check that the second isomorphism is an isomorphism of S ∗G-modules.

66

3.4. The Auslander correspondence
3) We have
rankS S ⊗k V = dimQ(S) Q(S) ⊗S S ⊗k V
= dimQ(S) Q(S) ⊗k V
= dimk V,
since V is a free k-module. 2

3.4.2. The functor G
Let M be an S ∗ G-module, we say that M is reflexive if it is reflexive as S-module, that
is the map λM : M → M ∗∗ = HomS (HomS (M , S), S) is an isomorphism of S-modules. So,
in the category mod(S ∗G) we consider the dual (−)∗ = HomS (−, S) of mod(S), instead of
HomS∗G (−, S ∗G). With a little abuse of notation we denote by Ref(S ∗G) the full subcategory of mod(S ∗G) consisting of reflexive S ∗G-modules. Since an S ∗G-module is S ∗Gprojective if and only if it is S-projective, and finitely generated projective S-modules are
reflexive by Corollary 1.3.8, we obtain that proj(S ∗ G) is a subcategory of Ref(S ∗G).
We define two functors:
G : Ref(S ∗ G) → Ref(R)
M 7→ M G ,
(ϕ : M 1 → M 2 ) 7→ (ϕ|M G : M 1G → M 2G ),
1

and
G 0 : Ref(R) → Ref(S ∗ G)
N 7→ (S ⊗R N )∗∗ ,
(ψ : N1 → N2 ) 7→ (idS ⊗ ψ)∗∗ ,
where (−)∗ denotes the dual HomS (−, S).
The module (S ⊗R N )∗∗ is reflexive, so the functor G 0 is well defined. For G we need to
prove that M G is reflexive if M ∈ Ref(S ∗ G). We consider the presentation
(S ∗ G)m → (S ∗ G)` → M ∗ → 0,
and we apply HomS (−, S) and take G-invariants. Since (−)G is an exact functor by Lemma
3.3.3, and (S ∗ G)G = S by Remark 3.3.6, we get an exact sequence
0 → MG → S` → Sm .
The ring S is normal, in particular it satisfies the (S 2 )-condition by Theorem 1.4.12. Since
it is integral over R, S satisfies condition (S 2 ) also as R-module. Applying the Depth
Lemma to the previous sequence we get that M G satisfies (S 2 ) too, hence it is reflexive
by Theorem 1.4.16.

67

3. Quotient Singularites
Lemma 3.4.8. Let M be a reflexive S ∗ G-module, then we have an isomorphism of S ∗ Gmodules
M∼
= (S ⊗R M G )∗∗ .
Proof: We define the map ψ : (S ⊗R M G )∗∗ → M to be the composition
δ∗∗

λ−1

(S ⊗R M G )∗∗ −−→ M ∗∗ −−→ M ,
where δ : S ⊗R M G → M is given by δ(s ⊗ m) = sm and λ is the canonical isomorphism
λ : M → M ∗∗ . We prove that ψ is an isomorphism. It is enough to show that δ∗∗ is an
isomorphism, and since (S ⊗R M G )∗∗ and M are reflexive, it suffices to show that δ∗ :
M ∗ → (S ⊗R M G )∗ is an isomorphism. We consider a presentation of the S ∗ G-module
M ∗ and the following commutative diagram
F1
δ

M∗

F0
∗

¡
¢∗
S ⊗R (F 1 )G

δ

∗

¡
¢∗
S ⊗R (F 0 )G

δ

0

∗

(S ⊗R M G )∗

0,

where F 0 and F 1 are projective S ∗ G-modules. By the Five Lemma and additivity we can
assume that M = S ∗ G. In this case, we can compose δ∗ with the isomorphisms
¡
¢∗
¡
¢∗
S ⊗R (S ∗ G)G ∼
= (S ⊗R S)∗ ∼
= S ∗ ⊗R S ∼
= (EndR (S))∗ ,
to obtain a map (S ∗ G)∗ → (EndR (S))∗ , which we call again δ∗ . By construction the last
map is nothing but the dual of the inverse map of the isomorphism γ : S ∗ G → EndR (S)
of Theorem 3.3.9, that is δ∗ = (γ−1 )∗ . Therefore δ∗ is an isomorphism. 2
If the ring S has dimension 2 we can give a more geometric proof of the previous result
using the following generalization of the classical Lemma of Speiser [SS88, §92, Aufgabe
16.c., page 763] due to Auslander and Goldman [AG60, Theorem 3.1]. The reader may
consult also the paper of Chase, Harrison, and Rosenberg [CHR65, Theorem 1.3].
Lemma 3.4.9 (Speiser, Auslander-Goldman). Let S be a commutative domain, G a finite
group of ring automorphisms of S and denote by R = S G the invariant ring. Then the
following facts are equivalent.
1) S is a separable R-algebra.
2) For every g 6= idG and every maximal ideal p in S, there exists s ∈ S such that s −g (s) 6∈ p.
3) The map δ : S ⊗R M G → M given by δ(s ⊗ m) = sm is an isomorphism for every S ∗ Gmodule M .
L
4) There is a canonical isomorphism ψ : S ⊗R S → g ∈G S g , where S g = S for all g ∈ G. The
map ψ is given by ψ(s ⊗ t )g = sg (t ) ∈ S g .
Remark 3.4.10. Under the assumptions of Lemma 3.4.9, Chase, Harrison, and Rosenberg [CHR65] proved a ring version of the fundamental theorem of Galois theory. For
this reason, one often says that the ring extension R ⊆ S is Galois with Galois group G.

68

3.4. The Auslander correspondence
Lemma 3.4.11. Let S,k, G and R be as in Situation 3.1 and assume that S has Krull dimension 2. Let M be a reflexive S ∗ G-module and consider the canonical map
δ : S ⊗R M G → M ,
given by δ(s ⊗ m) = sm. Then the following facts hold.

∼

f on the punctured spec1) δ induces an isomorphism of coherent sheaves S ⊗R M G → M
0
trum U = SpecS \ {m}.
2) δ induces an isomorphism of S ∗ G-modules

(S ⊗R M G )∗∗ ∼
= M.
Proof: By Theorem 1.5.19, S is a Cohen-Macaulay isolated singularity, so coherent sheaves
associated to MCM S-modules are locally free on the punctured spectrum. Moreover we
recall that reflexive S-modules are MCM in this case. Therefore it follows from Lemma
1.5.23 and Corollary 1.5.25 that property 1) implies property 2).
We prove 1). Let f 1 , . . . , f µ be elements in R which generate m up to radical, that is
q
( f 1 , . . . , f µ ) = m as ideals in S. These elements exist, since the ring extension R ,→ S is
S
finite (Theorem 3.4.1). Thus, we have an open covering U 0 = i D( f i ).
We claim that for every f = f i the induced map
δ f : S f ⊗R f M G
f → Mf
is an isomorphism. We prove the claim, then the Lemma will follow from it. In fact,
because we have a global homomorphism, we get a sheaf homomorphism defined on U 0
which is locally an isomorphism, so it is forced to be an isomorphism on U 0 .
To prove the claim, let f be one of the f i ’s. We check that condition 2) of Lemma 3.4.9
is true for S f and R f . Let p be a maximal ideal of S f . If s − g (s) ∈ p for every s ∈ S f and
every g ∈ G, then we have s ∈ p if and only if g (s) ∈ p, which is equivalent to say that p is a
fix-point for the action of G on on S f . On the other hand, since G is small, its action on
U 0 is fix-point-free, so we get a contradiction. Therefore δ f is an isomorphism by Lemma
3.4.9 above. 2
Remark 3.4.12. Let C and C 0 be two abelian categories, and let F : C → C 0 and G :
C 0 → C be two functors which are quasi-inverse on the objects, that is G(F (A)) ∼
= A and
F (G(B )) ∼
= B for all A ∈ C and B ∈ C 0 . If F ◦ G and G ◦ F are surjective on Hom’s, that is
HomC (A, B )  HomC (G(F (A)),G(F (B ))), and HomC 0 (C , D)  HomC 0 (F (G(C )), F (G(D))),
then F and G are an equivalence of categories. This is explained by the following commutative diagram
HomC (A, B )

HomC 0 (F (A), F (B ))

HomC (G(F (A)),G(F (B )))
∼
=

HomC (A, B ),

69

3. Quotient Singularites
and by the analogous diagram for F ◦ G.
Theorem 3.4.13. Let S, G, k and R be as in Situation 3.1. Then the functors G : Ref(S∗G) →
Ref(R), and G 0 : Ref(R) → Ref(S ∗G) give an equivalence of categories
Ref(S ∗ G) ∼
= Ref(R).
Proof: First, we show that G and G 0 are quasi-inverse on the objects. From Lemma 3.4.8,
or Lemma 3.4.11 in dimension 2, we know that G 0 (G (M )) ∼
= M for every reflexive S ∗ Gmodule M .
Let N be an R-module, we define the following isomorphism ϕ : N → ((S ⊗R N )∗∗ )G
such that ϕ(n) = λ(1⊗n), where λ : S ⊗R N → (S ⊗R N )∗∗ is the canonical map. By Lemma
1.4.14 to prove that ϕ is an isomorphism, it is enough to show that
³¡
¢G ´
¡¡
¢∗∗ ¢G
∼
ϕp : Np → (S ⊗R N )∗∗
= S p ⊗Rp Np
p

is an isomorphism for every p ∈ SpecR with dim R p ≤ 1. In this case Np is a free R p module, so we may assume Np = R p by additivity. Then the isomorphism is clear.
Now we prove that G and G 0 are surjective on Hom’s. Let f : N1 → N2 be an arrow in
Ref(R), then from the following commutative diagram
ϕ

N1

((S ⊗R N1 )∗∗ )G

ϕ−1

N1
f0

f
ϕ

N2

((S ⊗R N2 )∗∗ )G

ϕ

−1

N2

we obtain the existence of an arrow f 0 in Ref(R) such that G (G 0 ( f 0 )) = f . In the same way,
if g : M 1 → M 2 is an arrow in Ref(S ∗ G) and ψ is the isomorphism of Lemma 3.4.8, then
the commutative diagram
M1

ψ−1

(S ⊗R M 1G )∗∗

ψ

g0

g

M2

M1

ψ−1

(S ⊗R M 2G )∗∗

ψ

M2

shows the surjectivity of G 0 ◦ G on Hom’s. Therefore G and G 0 are an equivalence of
categories by the previous Remark 3.4.12. 2
Proposition 3.4.14. Let P and Q be reflexive S∗G-modules. Then the following facts hold.
1) G (HomS (P,Q)) ∼
= HomR (G (P ), G (Q)).

70

3.4. The Auslander correspondence
∼ G (P ) R G (Q).
2) G (P ⊗S Q) =
3) rankR G (P ) = rankS P .
Proof: 1) The fixed point functor G is an equivalence of categories, so we have
HomS (P,Q)G = HomS∗G (P,Q) ∼
= HomR (P G ,Q G ).
as required.
2) We recall that if M and N are reflexive R-modules, then the reflexive tensor product
of M and N is defined as M R N = (M ⊗R N )∗∗ and by Proposition 1.3.12 it satisfies the
adjunction HomR (M R N , L) ∼
= HomR (M , HomR (N , L)) for every L ∈ Ref(R).
Let L be a reflexive R-module and let U ∈ Ref(S ∗G) such that U G = L. We have
¡
¢
¡
¢
HomR (P ⊗S Q)G , L = HomR (P ⊗S Q)G ,U G
= HomS∗G (P ⊗S Q,U )
∼
= HomS∗G (P, HomS (Q,U ))
¡
¢
∼
= HomR P G , HomS∗G (Q,U )
¡
¢
∼
= HomR P G , HomR (Q G ,U G )
¡
¢
∼ HomR P G , HomR (Q G , L)
=
∼
= HomR (P G R Q G , L).
So we get an isomorphism of R-modules
¡
¢
HomR (P ⊗S Q)G , L ∼
= HomR (P G R Q G , L),

which is functorial in L. It follows that (P ⊗S Q)G ∼
= P G R Q G , as required.
3) It is enough to show that rankS G 0 (N ) = rankR N for every N ∈ Ref(R). Since G 0 (N ) =
(S ⊗R N )∗∗ , the last statement is clear. 2
We concentrate again on the category of finitely generated projective S ∗ G-modules.
These are reflexive modules, so we can restrict the functor G to the full subcategory
proj(S ∗ G) ⊆ Ref(S ∗ G). We denote this restriction and its quasi inverse again by G and
G 0 respectively. It turns out that the image of proj(S ∗ G) under G consists exactly of the
reflexive R-modules which are direct summands of finite free S-modules, that is the category AddR (S). More precisely we have the following result.
Proposition 3.4.15. Let S, G and R as in Situation 3.1. The functors G : proj(S ∗ G) →
AddR (S) and G 0 : AddR (S) → proj(S ∗ G) induce an equivalence of categories
proj(S ∗ G) ∼
= AddR (S).
Proof: We know that G and G 0 are quasi inverse on the objects by Theorem 3.4.13, and
that proj(S ∗ G) is a Krull-Schmidt category by Corollary 3.4.5. Therefore it is enough

71

3. Quotient Singularites
to show that the indecomposable projective S ∗ G-modules correspond exactly to the
indecomposable R-direct summands of S.
Let M be an indecomposable finitely generated projective S∗G-module, then by Lemma
3.4.6 M is a direct summand of S ∗G, so we have a splitting inclusion 0 → M ,→ S ∗G. Taking G-invariants we obtain an inclusion
0 → M G ,→ S,
which has a right splitting given by the Reynolds operator. It follows that M G ∈ AddR (S),
which concludes the proof. 2
Corollary 3.4.16. Let S, G and R be as in Situation 3.1. Then there is a one-one correspondence between
• indecomposable objects of AddR (S);
• indecomposable objects of proj(EndR (S));
• indecomposable objects of proj(S ∗ G).

3.4.3. The Auslander functor
We can compose the functors we have considered so far to obtain the desired correspondence between k-representations of G and R-modules.
Definition 3.4.17. Let S, G, k and R be as in Situation 3.1. We define the Auslander
functor to be
A = G ◦ F : mod(k[G]) → AddR (S)
V 7→ (S ⊗k V )G ,
and its right-adjoint
A 0 = F 0 ◦ G 0 : AddR (S) → mod(k[G])
N 7→ (S ⊗R N )∗∗ ⊗S k.
Theorem 3.4.18 (Auslander correspondence). Let S, G, k and R be as in Situation 3.1.
The functors A : mod(k[G]) → AddR (S) and A 0 : AddR (S) → mod(k[G]) have the following
properties.
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)

72

∼W.
A (V ) ∼
= A (W ) if and only if V =
A (V ) is indecomposable in AddR (S) if and only V is an irreducible representation.
A (Homk (V,W )) ∼
= HomR (A (V ), A (W )) for every V,W ∈ mod(k[G]).
A (V ⊗k W ) ∼
A
(V
) R A (W ) for every V,W ∈ mod(k[G]).
=
If V0 is the trivial representation then A (V0 ) = R.
rankR A (V ) = dimk V for every k[G]-module V .

3.4. The Auslander correspondence
Proof: Properties 1) and 2) follow from Proposition 3.4.3 and Theorem 3.4.13. Properties
3), 4), and 6) follow from Proposition 3.4.7 and Proposition 3.4.14, while 5) is a straightforward computation. 2
The Auslander functor gives a one-one correspondence between
• irreducible k-representations of G;
• indecomposable R-direct summands of S.
In the two-dimensional regular case, Herzog [Her78b] proved that the latter are exactly
the indecomposable reflexive R-modules.
Theorem 3.4.19 (Herzog). Let S, G, k and R be as in Situation 3.1, and assume that S is
regular of Krull dimension 2. Then
Ref(R) = AddR (S).
Proof: We observed already that AddR (S) ⊆ Ref(R) holds in general. In fact, S is Rreflexive since it satisfies Serre’s condition (S 2 ), then also a finite sum of copies of S is
reflexive. Then reflexive summands of reflexive modules are reflexive, so the inclusion
holds.
Conversely, let M be a reflexive R-module. We apply the functor HomR (M ∗ , −) to the
inclusion R ,→ S, we get another inclusion
M ∗∗ = HomR (M ∗ , R) ,→ HomR (M ∗ , S).
The Reynolds operator gives a splitting for the previous inclusion, hence M ∼
= M ∗∗ is
∗
a direct summand of N := HomR (M , S). From Lemma 1.4.13 we have that N satisfies
Serre’s condition (S 2 ) as R-module, hence it satisfies it also as S-module. Since S is normal, Theorem 1.4.16 implies that N is reflexive over S. It follows that N is S-free, because
S is regular. Therefore M is a direct sum of a finite free S-module, that is an object of
AddR (S). 2
Corollary 3.4.20. Let S, G, k and R be as in Situation 3.1, and assume that S is regular of
dimension 2. Then the following facts hold.
1) The category Ref(R) has the Krull-Remak-Schmidt property.
2) Let P 0 , P 1 , . . . , P r be a complete set of non-isomorphic indecomposable projective S ∗Gmodules and let Ni := G (P i ) = P iG . Then N0 , . . . , Nr is a complete set of non-isomorphic
indecomposable reflexive R-modules. In particular these are exactly the indecomposable R-direct summands of S.
3) R is a Cohen-Macaulay ring of finite CM type.
Proof: By Herzog’s Theorem above we have Ref(R) = AddR (S), and by Proposition 3.4.15
AddR (S) is equivalent to proj(S ∗G), which is a Krull-Schmidt category by Corollary 3.4.5.
This shows part 1).

73

3. Quotient Singularites
Part 2) follows again from the equivalence of Proposition 3.4.15. The fact that an indecomposable summand of a free S-module must be an indecomposable summand of S is
a consequence of the KRS property.
Finally, R is CM by Theorem 1.5.19, and MCM(R) = Ref(R) in dimension 2, so part 3)
holds. 2
Corollary 3.4.21. Let S, G, k and R be as in Situation 3.1, and assume that S is regular of dimension 2. Let V0 ,V1 , . . . ,Vr be a complete set of non-isomorphic irreducible krepresentations of G, and fix Ni = A (Vi ) = (S ⊗k Vi )G . Then N0 , . . . , Nr is a complete set of
non-isomorphic indecomposable MCM R-modules. Moreover let V be a k-representation,
which decomposes as
n
n
V = V0 0 ⊕ · · · ⊕ Vr r ,
for some natural numbers n i . Then the MCM R-module N := A (V ) = (S ⊗k V )G decomposes as
n
n
N = N0 0 ⊕ · · · ⊕ Nr r .
A converse to the previous Corollary 3.4.20 is given by the following theorem of Auslander [Aus86b, Theorem 4.9], which says that the invariant rings S = Cu, vG are the
unique rings of finite CM type over the complex numbers.
Theorem 3.4.22 (Auslander). Let R be a two-dimensional normal complete local C-domain
such that the number of isomorphism classes of indecomposable MCM R-modules is finite.
Then there exists a finite group G acting linearly on S = Cu, v such that R ∼
= SG .
In the following diagram we summarize the main results of this chapter. We recall that
the functors F and F 0 are an adjoint pair, while G and G 0 are equivalence of categories.
Ref(S ∗ G)
mod(k[G])

F
F

0

proj(S ∗ G)

G
G

0

G
G0

Ref(R)

dim 2

MCM(R)

AddR (S)

3.5. Quotient singularities
From now on we fix S = kx 1 , . . . , x n , a power series ring over an algebraically closed
field k and we consider a finite group G acting on S and the corresponding invariant ring
R = S G . Assume that the order of G is invertible in k. From Theorem 3.4.1 we know that
R is a complete, Noetherian, normal, Cohen-Macaulay, local domain of dimension n. In
particular since R is complete, the category of finitely generated R-modules mod(R) has
the KRS property by Theorem 1.1.10.
We would like to apply the theory developed in the previous sections to this situation.
To do this, one should assume the following hypothesis:

74

3.5. Quotient singularities
• the group G acts k-linearly on S, i.e. G ⊆ GL(n, k);
• the ring extension R ,→ S is unramified in codimension one.
In fact these conditions are not so restrictive as it could seem, on the contrary they appear
quite naturally in invariant theory as the next results will illustrate.
The following old theorem of Cartan [Car57] allows us to assume that G is acting by
linear changes of variables on S, in other words G ⊆ GL(n, k).
Theorem 3.5.1 (Cartan). Let k be a field and let S = kx 1 , . . . , x n . Let G be a finite group
of k-algebras automorphism of S with |G| invertible in k. Then there exists a finite group
G 1 ⊆ GL(n, k), acting on S via linear changes of variables, such that S G ∼
= SG1 .
Proof: Let m = (x 1 , . . . , x n ) and consider the vector space V = m/m2 , consisting of linear
forms of S. The action of G on V is linear, so we have a group homomorphism ϕ : G →
GL(V ). We set G 1 = ϕ(G), and we extend the action of G 1 to S by linearity. We define a
ring homomorphism θ : S → S
θ(s) :=

1 X
ϕ(g )−1 g (s).
|G| g ∈G

The restriction of θ to V is the identity, hence θ is an automorphism of S. For every h ∈ G
we have ϕ(h)◦θ = θ ◦h, so the actions of G and G 1 are conjugate. It follows that they have
isomorphic rings of invariants. 2
A consequence of the Theorem of Cartan is that, dealing with invariant rings we may
assume without loss of generality that the group G acts linearly on S.
Definition 3.5.2. Let k be a field and let G ⊆ GL(n, k) be a finite group. The invariant ring
R = kx 1 , . . . , x n G is called quotient singularity. If G ⊆ SL(n, k) then R is called special
quotient singularity. If G is cyclic then R is called cyclic quotient singularity.
For a quotient singularity the requirement that the prime ideals of height one are unramified can be translated into a condition on the group G, it is equivalent to the group
being small.
Definition 3.5.3. Let G ⊆ GL(n, k) be a finite subgroup. An element g ∈ G is called a
pseudo-reflection if rank(I n − g ) = 1, where I n denotes the identity matrix in GL(n, k). A
group G is called small if it contains no pseudo-reflections.
Example 3.5.4. Subgroups of SL(n, k) are small. To see this, consider g ∈ SL(n, k) such
that rank(I n − g ) = 1. This forces g to be a diagonal matrix with diagonal entries given by
all 1’s and one element ξ 6= 1. However this is not possible, since det g = 1.
We present the following characterization without proof, the interested reader shoud
consult [LW12, Theorem B.29].

75

3. Quotient Singularites
Theorem 3.5.5. Let k be a field, let S = kx 1 , . . . , x n  and let G ⊆ GL(n, k) be a finite group
acting linearly on S with invariant ring R = S G . Then R ,→ S is unramified in codimension
one if and only if G is small.
The opposite of a small group is a reflection group, that is a group which is generated by
pseudo-reflections. From the point of view of invariant theory the action of these groups
is irrelevant, as the following classical result of Chevalley, Shephard, and Todd shows.
Theorem 3.5.6 (Chevalley-Shephard-Todd). Let k be an algebraically closed field, S =
kx 1 , . . . , x n  and G a finite subgroup of GL(n, k) such that |G| is invertible in k. Then the
following facts are equivalent.
• R = S G is a power series ring.
• G is generated by pseudo-reflections.
• S is free as an R-module.
Example 3.5.7. We consider the cyclic group G

1 0 ...
0 1 . . .


..
g =
.




generated by the pseudo-reflection

0 0
0 0


,


1 0
0 ξ

where ξ is a primitive m-th root of 1 in k. Then we have kx 1 , . . . , x n G = kx 1 , . . . , x n−1 , x nm  ∼
=
ky 1 , . . . , y n . So the invariant ring is regular.
As for the condition G ⊆ GL(n, k), also in this case we may assume without loss of
generality that the group is small. This is a result of Prill [Pri67, Proposition 6].
Theorem 3.5.8 (Prill). Let k be a field, S = kx 1 , . . . , x n  and G a finite subgroup of GL(n, k).
Then there exists a small finite subgroup G 1 ⊆ GL(n, k) such that S G ∼
= SG1 .
As we have already noticed, quotient singularities are Cohen-Macaulay rings. Watanabe [Wat74a, Wat74b] proved that the Gorenstein ones are exactly the special quotient
singularities.
Theorem 3.5.9 (Watanabe). Let k be a field and G ⊆ GL(n, k) a finite group acting linearly
on S = kx 1 , . . . , x n . Assume that G is small and the order of G is invertible in k. Then S G
is Gorenstein if and only if G ⊆ SL(n, k).
We can apply the results of the previous Section 3.4 to quotient singularities. For ease
of reference we collect them in the following theorem.
Theorem 3.5.10 (Auslander correspondence). Let k be an algebraically closed field, let
G be a small subgroup of GL(n, k) acting on S = kx 1 , . . . , x n  such that chark does not
divide |G| and let R = S G be the corresponding quotient singularity. There is a one-one
correspondence between

76

3.5. Quotient singularities
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

indecomposable objects in AddR (S);
indecomposable objects in proj(S ∗ G);
indecomposable objects in proj(EndR (S));
indecomposable objects in mod(k[G]);
irreducible k-representations of G.

Explicitly, the correspondence 5) → 1) is given by the Auslander functor
¡
¢G
V 7→ A (V ) = S ⊗k V ;

and the correspondence 1) → 5) is given by its right-adjoint
¡
¢∗∗
⊗S k.
N 7→ A 0 (N ) = S ⊗R N

Moreover, if n = 2 we have AddR (S) = Ref(R) = MCM(R) and R has finite Cohen-Macaulay
type.
Remark 3.5.11. There is also a graded version of Theorem 3.5.10. Instead of a power
series ring, one may consider a polynomial ring S = k[x 1 , . . . , x n ] with a Z-grading and
restrict to finitely generated Z-graded modules. For a proof and further details in the
graded setting the reader may consult the remarkable paper of Iyama and Takahashi
[IT13].
Example 3.5.12. Let C n =< g > be the cyclic group of Example 3.1.14, with irreducible
representations (Vt , ρ t ) over an algebraically closed field k given by ρ t (g ) = ξt , for a fixed
primitive n-th root of unity ξ ∈ k. Assume that chark does not divide |G|. We can embed
G into GL(2, k) via the representation V1 ⊕ Va , where a is a natural number such that
(a, n) = 1, otherwise the representation is not faithful. In other words, we consider the
cyclic group generated by
¶
µ
ξ 0
.
0 ξa
This group acts linearly on S = ku, v and the invariant subring R is generated by monomials u i v j such that i + a j ∼
= 0 mod n.
For each irreducible representation Vt , we have an indecomposable MCM R-module
M t = (S ⊗k Vt )G . A straightforward computation shows that this is given by
³
Mt = R ui v j : i + a j ∼
= −t

´
mod n .

Example 3.5.13. We consider the group B D 2 of Example 3.1.15 and we embed it into
GL(2, C) through the two-dimensional irreducible faithful representation (V1 , ρ 1 ). We
identify B D 2 with its image, generated by the matrices
µ

¶
µ
¶
i 0
0 i
ρ 1 (a) =
, ρ 1 (b) =
.
0 −i
i 0

77

3. Quotient Singularites
This group acts on S = Cu, v and the invariant ring is
R = Cu 4 + v 4 , u 2 v 2 , uv(u 4 − v 4 ).
Following González-Sprinberg and Verdier [GSV81], we can represent the indecomposable MCM R-modules as A-modules inside S, where A = Cu 4 + v 4 , u 2 v 2  is the ring of
µ
¶
0 1
invariants of the group generated by the matrices ρ(a), ρ(b), and
.
1 0
For every irreducible representation Vt (labelled as in Example 3.1.15) the corresponding indecomposable MCM R-module M t = A (Vt ) = (S ⊗k Vt )G is given by
M 0 = R,
M 1 = (u, uv 4 , u 2 v, v 3 )A,
M 2 = (uv, u 4 − v 4 )A,
M 3 = (uv(u 2 − v 2 ), u 2 + v 2 )A
M 4 = (uv(u 2 + v 2 ), u 2 − v 2 )A.
One should check that these are actually R-modules. To do so, it is enough to multiply
the element g = uv(u 4 − v 4 ) ∈ R \ A with every element in a system of generators for
the module M t and check that the product is again in M t . We do this explicitely for the
module M 2 , and we leave the rest as an exercise for the reader.
A system of generators for M 2 as A-module is given by uv and u 4 − v 4 . Thus, we have
g · uv = u 2 v 2 (u 4 − v 4 ) ∈ M 2 ,
since u 2 v 2 ∈ A, and u 4 − v 4 ∈ M 2 . Then, we have
g · (u 4 − v 4 ) = uv(u 4 − v 4 )2 = uv(u 8 + v 8 − 2u 4 v 4 ) ∈ M 2 ,
because uv ∈ M 2 and u 8 + v 8 − 2u 4 v 4 ∈ A, since −2u 4 v 4 ∈ A, and u 8 + v 8 = (u 4 + v 4 )2 −
2u 4 v 4 ∈ A.
The following example is due to Auslander and Reiten [AR89, Theorem 4.1], the reader
may consult also Yoshino’s book [Yos90, Proposition 16.10]. It shows that Theorem 3.4.19
may fail in dimension ≥ 3.
Example 3.5.14 (Auslander-Reiten). Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 6= 2, and let G be the cyclic group of order 2 acting on S = kx, y, z by negating each
variable. Then the invariant ring R = kx 2 , y 2 , z 2 , x y, xz, y z is a Cohen-Macaulay ring
of finite CM type. Its only indecomposable modules are the ring R itself, the canonical
module K R = (x y, y 2 , y z)R, and U = K R3 / < (x y, 0, 0), (0, y 2 , 0), (0, 0, y 2 ) >.
Notice that the modules R and K R are coming from irreducible representations of G,
while U is not. We have R = A (V0 ) and K R = A (V1 ), where V0 is the trivial representation
and V1 is the unique non-trivial irreducible representation of G.

78

4. Symmetric signature of quotient
singularities
If it works, it’s out of date.
David Bowie

The main goal of this chapter is to compute the symmetric signature of two classes
of two-dimensional quotient singularites: cyclic quotient singularites and Kleinian singularities. The latter are a particular class of special quotient singularites, which in fact
coincide with them if the base field has characteristic zero. Since the strategy of the proof
is similar in the two cases, we will give an outline of the main ideas before going on with
the results.
Let k be an algebraically closed field, and let G be a small finite subgroup of GL(2, k)
such that chark does not divide |G|. The group G acts linearly on S = ku, v and we denote by R the invariant ring. R is a Cohen-Macaulay normal ring of dimension 2 of finite
CM type, so we may consider and compute also the generalized symmetric signature of
R. Given an indecomposable MCM R-module M t , we need to count how many copies of
M t appear as direct summands of the MCM R-module
¡
¢¢∗∗
q¡
S q = SymR Syz2R (k)

for q → +∞. We will use the Auslander correspondence and the theory developed in
Chapter 3 to translate this algebraic problem into the language of representation theory.
Let mR be the maximal ideal of R and let p 1 , . . . , p µ be a minimal system of generators for it. We consider p 1 , . . . , p µ as elements of S and we write the beginning of a free
resolution of the S-module S/(p 1 , . . . , p µ )
p 1 ,...,p µ

0 → Syz1S (p 1 , . . . , p µ ) → S µ −−−−−→ S → S/(p 1 , . . . , p µ ) → 0.

(4.1)

We observe that we have a natural action of G on this sequence. The group G acts linearly on S, and this action is expressed by the fundamental representation V1 . This
action extends naturally to the free S-module S µ , and therefore also to its submodule
Syz1S (p 1 , . . . , p µ ). We denote by V the representation of G which express its action on
Syz1S (p 1 , . . . , p µ ). From (4.1) it is clear that rankS Syz1S (p 1 , . . . , p µ ) = µ − 1, therefore V is a
representation of dimension µ − 1.

79

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities
Actually, we have just observed that the sequence (4.1) is an exact sequence of S ∗ Gmodules. We apply the exact G-invariant functor G to it and we get
0 → M → R µ → R → k → 0.
Since p 1 , . . . , p µ is a system of generators of the maximal ideal of R, we obtain a copy of
the residue field k in the last position. It follows that the module M is the second syzygy
of the residue field, in other words M = Syz2R (k). From our construction it is clear that
Syz1S (p 1 , . . . , p µ )G = Syz2R (k), and consequently that M = A (V ) = (S ⊗k V )G .
We will show in Section 4.1 that the Auslander functor A commutes with reflexive
symmetric powers, in particular we have
q

q

SymR (M )∗∗ = A (Symk (V )),
q

where Symk (−) are the usual symmetric powers of representations. Now let Vt be an
irreducible k-representation and let M t = A (Vt ) be the corresponding indecomposable
MCM R-module. From Corollary 3.4.21 we have that the multiplicity a t ,q of the module
q
q
M t into SymR (M )∗∗ is equal to the multiplicity of the representation Vt into Symk (V ).
The latter is much easier to compute, since we may use characters from Section 3.2 to do
that.
To procede in this way, one needs to determine the representation V and its character.
For the Kleinian singularities it turns out that the ideal mR is minimally generated by 3
elements, so M = Syz2R (k) is an R-module of rank 2, and V is a two-dimensional representation. In Section 4.3 we will prove that V is exactly the fundamental representation
V1 . For cyclic singularities one cannot expect this, since in general µ may be bigger than
3. However, we will prove in Section 4.5 that V is always a faithful representation in this
case, and this is enough to compute the symmetric signature.
The outline of this chapter is the following. As already mentioned, in Section 4.1 we
will prove that the Auslander functor commutes with reflexive symmetric powers (Theorem 4.1.8). In Section 4.2 we will present the Kleinian or ADE singularities. First, we will
introduce them over C, since this is the context where they appear naturally, and then we
will define them over any algebraically closed field. Section 4.3 is dedicated to the study
of the syzygy module Syz2R (k) and its associated representation for the Kleinian singularites. Finally, in Section 4.4 and Section 4.5 we will compute the symmetric signature for
Kleinian and cyclic singularites respectively.

4.1. Auslander functor and symmetric powers
We recall the definition and some properties of the symmetric powers of sheaves. Let
(X , O X ) be a scheme, in the sense of Hartshorne ([Har77, Chapter II, 2.]), and let F be a
sheaf of O X -modules. We construct a presheaf by assigning to each open set U of X the
O X (U )-module Symq F (U ). The sheaf associated to this presheaf is the q-th symmetric
q
power of F and it is denoted by Sym X F .

80

4.1. Auslander functor and symmetric powers
Remark 4.1.1. Let R be a commutative Noetherian ring and let M be an R-module. Then
over X = SpecR, we have the following equality of sheaves

∼

q f
q
Sym X (M
) = SymR (M ).

In other words, symmetric powers commute with sheafification.
Lemma 4.1.2. Let f : X → Y be a morphism of schemes and let F be a sheaf on Y . Then
¡
¢
q
q
Sym X ( f ∗ F ) ∼
= f ∗ SymY (F ) ,

as sheaves on X .
Proof: See [Har77, Ex. II 5.16]. 2
Now, we restrict to the situation of two-dimensional quotient singularites. We fix an
algebraically closed field k, and a small finite subgroup G of GL(2, k) such that the characteristic of k does not divide the order of |G|. G acts on the power series ring S =
ku, v, and we denote by R the corresponding invariant ring. We know that R is a twodimensional isolated singularity of finite CM type and that MCM(R) = Ref(R) = AddR (S).
We denote by U = SpecR \ {m} the punctured spectrum of R.
Remark 4.1.3. Consider the following commutative diagram
U 0 −−−−→ SpecS




πy
πy
U −−−−→ SpecR
where the map π is induced by the inclusion R ,→ S, and U 0 = π−1 (U ) is the pull-back of
U to SpecS, which is actually the punctured spectrum of S. For every R-module M this
gives us the following identification of sheaves on U 0

∼¯¯
f|U ) ∼
π∗ ( M
= S ⊗R M ¯

U0

.

(4.2)

We recall that the Auslander functor A : mod(k[G]) → MCM(R) and its right-adjoint
A 0 : MCM(R) → mod(k[G]) are defined as A (V ) = (S⊗k V )G and A 0 (M ) = (S⊗R M )∗∗ ⊗S k.
We want to prove that the Auslander functor commutes with reflexive symmetric powers Symq (−)∗∗ , that is
q
q
A (Symk (V )) ∼
= (SymR (A (V )))∗∗
for every k[G]-module V . Since the Auslander functor is the composition of the functors
F : mod(k[G]) → proj(S ∗ G), F (V ) = S ⊗k V and G : proj(S ∗ G) → MCM(R), G (N ) = N G ,
we will split the proof of this fact in two propositions.

81

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities
Remark 4.1.4. Observe that in the categories mod(k[G]) and proj(S ∗ G) the reflexive
symmetric powers coincide with the usual symmetric powers. In fact, every finitely generated k[G]-module V is reflexive, so it is canonically isomorphic to its double dual V ∗∗ .
Since S is regular, for every finitely generated projective S ∗ G-module N the symmetric
q
powers SymS (N ) are S-free, hence reflexive.
Proposition 4.1.5. For every k[G]-module V we have an isomorphism of S ∗ G-modules
q
q
SymS (S ⊗k V ) ∼
= S ⊗k Symk (V ).

Proof: We consider the following S-multilinear map
q

ψ : (S × V ) × · · · × (S × V ) −→ S ⊗k Symk (V )
¡
¢
(a 1 , v 1 ), . . . , (a q , v q ) 7→ (a 1 . . . a q ) ⊗ (v 1 ◦ · · · ◦ v q ).
From universal properties of tensor product and symmetric powers functor we obtain a
q
q
homomorphism ψ : SymS (S ⊗k V ) −→ S ⊗k Symk (V ), given by the following commutative
diagram
(S × V ) × · · · × (S × V )

ψ

q

S ⊗k Symk (V )
ψ

(S ⊗k V ) × · · · × (S ⊗k V )
q

SymS (S ⊗k V ).
The homomorphism ψ is in fact an isomorphism (see [Eis94, Proposition A2.2]). It remains to check that ψ is compatible with the action of G, and this is shown by the following commutative diagram
(a 1 ⊗ v 1 ) ◦ · · · ◦ (a q ⊗ v q )

ψ

(a 1 · · · a q ) ⊗ (v 1 ◦ · · · ◦ v q )
g

g

¡

¢
¡
¢
g (a 1 ) ⊗ g (v 1 ) ◦ · · · ◦ g (a q ) ⊗ g (v q )

ψ

¡

g (a 1 . . . a q ) ⊗ g (v 1 ◦ · · · ◦ v q ) =
¢ ¡
¢
g (a 1 ) · · · g (a q ) ⊗ g (v 1 ) ◦ · · · ◦ g (v q ) .

2
Remark 4.1.6. The statement and the proof of Proposition 4.1.5 are true also if the dimension of S is greater than 2.
Proposition 4.1.7. Let N be a projective S ∗ G-module, then we have an isomorphism of
R-modules
¡
¢∗∗
q
q
(SymS (N ))G ∼
.
= SymR (N G )

82

4.1. Auslander functor and symmetric powers
Proof: Let G 0 (−) = (S ⊗R −)∗∗ be the right adjoint of the G-invariants functor G (−) = (−)G .
Since G and G 0 are an equivalence of categories (Theorem 3.4.13), it is enough to show
that
³¡
¡
¢
¢∗∗ ´
q
q
G 0 (SymS (N ))G ∼
,
= G 0 SymR (N G )
that is

³

¡
¡
¢G ´∗∗ ³
¢∗∗ ´∗∗
q
q
∼
S ⊗R SymS (N )
,
= S ⊗R SymR (N G )

(4.3)

as S ∗ G-modules.
Notice that the two double duals on the right hand side of (4.3) are different: the first
one is the double dual in mod(R) and the second is the double dual in mod(S).
In order to prove (4.3), we consider the left hand side
the right hand
side sepa³ and
¡
¢G ´∗∗
q
q
∼
rately. From Lemma 3.4.8, the left hand side of (4.3) is S ⊗R SymS (N )
= SymS (N ).
For the S-module on the right hand side of (4.3) we use Lemma 1.5.23, and we interprete it as the evaluation of the sheaf
¯
¡
¢ ¯
q
G ∗∗ ¯
S ⊗R SymR (N ) ¯
¯ 0

∼

U

on the punctured spectrum U 0 of S.
From the commutative diagram of Remark 4.1.3 we get the isomorphism
¯
¯ ¶
¯ ¶
µ
µ
¯
¯
¢ ¯
¡
q
q
q
G ∗∗ ¯ ∼ ∗
S ⊗R SymR (N ) ¯ = π SymR (N G )∗∗ ¯¯ = π∗ SymR (N G )¯¯ ,
¯ 0
U
U

∼

∼

∼

U

where we can remove the double dual over U , thanks to Remark 1.5.24.
Since taking symmetric powers commute with sheafification and with the restriction
map of sheaves we get
¯ ¶
µ
³
´¯ ´
³³
¯
¢´
q ¡g
q g
q
∗
G ¯
∼
G|
G ) ¯¯
π SymR (N )¯ ∼
= π∗ Sym X N
= π∗ Sym X (N
U ,

∼

U

U

where the second and the third symmetric powers are sheaf symmetric powers taken
over X = SpecR. We set Y = SpecS, then by Lemma 4.1.2 we have
³ ¡
³
¢´
¢´
q ¡g
q
∗ g
∼
G
G|
π∗ Sym X N
U = SymY π N |U .
We apply again (4.2) and Remark 1.5.24 to obtain
¯ ¶
¯ ¶
µ
µ
³ ¡
¯
¯
¢´
q
q
q
G¯
∗ g
G ∗∗ ¯
∼
G
SymY π N |U = SymY S ⊗R N ¯
= SymY (S ⊗R N ) ¯ .

∼

∼

U0

U0

Since taking symmetric powers commutes with sheafification and with the restriction
map of sheaves we get
¯
¯ ¶
¯
µ
³
¯
¯
¢ ´¯
q
q ¡
q
G ∗∗ ¯
G ∗∗ ¯ ∼
∼
SymY (S ⊗R N ) ¯
¯ = SymS (N )¯¯ ,
= SymS S ⊗R N
¯ 0
U0
U0

∼

∼ ∼
U

83

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities
where the last isomorphism follows from Lemma 3.4.8. Taking global sections on U 0
q
we obtain that the right hand side of (4.3) is also isomorphic to SymS (N ). Therefore
we have an isomorphism of S-modules as in (4.3). This is actually an isomorphism of
S ∗G-modules, because it is obtained from an isomorphism of sheaves on the punctured
spectrum U 0 , where the action of G is free. 2
From Proposition 4.1.5 and Proposition 4.1.7 we immediately get the following.
Theorem 4.1.8. Let V be a k[G]-module, and let M = (S⊗k V )G be the corresponding MCM
R-module via Auslander functor. Then we have
¡
¢G
q
q
SymR (M )∗∗ ∼
= S ⊗k Symk (V ) .
q

q

In other words SymR (A (V ))∗∗ ∼
= A (Symk (V )).

4.2. Kleinian singularities
We want to compute the symmetric signature of certain special quotient singularities,
called Kleinian singularities. In the literature these are also called with different names:
Du Val singularities, two-dimensional rational double points, ADE surface singularites,
simple surface singularities, to mention some of them. We will use these names indifferently. First, we will work over C, and then we extend the definition to algebraically closed
fields whose characteristic does not divide the order of the group.
One of the advantages of working over C is that two-dimensional special quotient singularites are completely classified. This is a consequence of the classical result that all
finite subgroups of SL(2, C) are known up to isomorphism.
Theorem 4.2.1 (Klein). Let G be a finite subgroup of SL(2, C). Then G is isomorphic to one
of the following groups:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

the cyclic group C n of order n ≥ 1;
the binary dihedral group B D n of order 4n, for n ≥ 2;
the binary tetrahedral group BT of order 24;
the binary octahedral group BO of order 48;
the binary icosahedral group B I of order 120.

Definition 4.2.2. The groups of Theorem 4.2.1 are called Klein groups, and the corresponding special quotient singularites Cu, vG are called complete complex Kleinian singularities or complex ADE singularities.
We will give an outline of the ideas behind the proof of Theorem 4.2.1, and then we will
describe the Klein groups and their quotient singularities. For a more detailed exposition
we recommend the notes of Brenner [Bre12].

84

4.2. Kleinian singularities
The classification of Theorem 4.2.1 rely on the classification of finite subgroups of
SO(3, R). Traditionally, this is attributed to Hessel, Bravais, and Möbius at the beginning
of 19th century. However Jordan was the first one to describe them with the modern
language of group theory.
The symmetry groups of the five platonic solids in R3 (tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, dodecahedron, and icosahedron) are finite subgroups of SO(3, R). Since the middle
points of the faces of a octahedron (respectively icosahedron) are a cube (resp. dodecahedron), we get only three distinct groups: the tetrahedral group T of order 12, the
octahedral group O of order 24 and the icosahedral group I of order 60. The tetrahedral
group is isomorphic to the alternating group A 4 , the octahedral group is isomorphic to
the symmetric group S 4 , and the icosahedral group is isomorphic to A 5 .
These are not all finite subgroups of SO(3, R). We have also the cyclic group C n of order
n, which is the rotation group of a regular n-agon in the plane, and the dihedral group
D n of order 2n. This group can be understood as the symmetry group of the hosohedron,
also called beach ball.
We collect these groups in the following theorem.
Theorem 4.2.3. Let G be a finite subgroup of SO(3, R). Then G is isomorphic to one of the
following groups:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

the cyclic group C n of order n ≥ 1;
the dihedral group D n of order 2n, for n ≥ 2;
the tetrahedral group T ∼
= A4;
the octahedral group O ∼
= S4;
the icosahedral group I ∼
= A5.

For a proof of the following two lemmas, see [LW12, Chapter 6] or [Bre12, Vorlesung 23
und 24].
Lemma 4.2.4. Every finite subgroup of SL(2, C) is conjugate to a subgroup of SU(2).
Lemma 4.2.5. There exists a surjective group homomorphism π : SU(2) → SO(3, R) with
kernel {±I }.
Remark 4.2.6. Notice that there is only one element of order 2 in SU(2), namely −I . So
every matrix of order 2 in SL(2, C) is conjugated to −I .
From Lemma 4.2.4 and Lemma 4.2.5, we get the following proposition that allows us
to describe the groups of Theorem 4.2.1.
Proposition 4.2.7. Let G be a finite subgroup of SU(2). Then either G is cyclic of odd order,
or |G| is even and G = π−1 (π(G)) is the preimage of a finite subgroup H = π(G) of SO(3).
We can rephrase Proposition 4.2.7 by saying that every finite subgroup G of SU(2) is
either cyclic of odd order, or it fits in a non-split short exact sequence
0 → C 2 → G → H → 0,

85

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities
where C 2 = {±I } and H is one of the groups of Theorem 4.2.3. In this case we say that G
is an extension of H by the cyclic group C 2 .
Now we are going to describe briefly the Klein groups and the corresponding quotient
singularities. In particular, for each group we will describe the one and two dimensional
representations and present a minimal set of generators of the maximal ideal of the invariant ring, since these will play an important role in Section 4.3. This information is
taken from [GAP15] and [LW12].

4.2.1. The singularity A n−1
Let n ∈ Z, n ≥ 2 and fix ξ := exp( 2πi
n ), a primitive n-th root of unity. The cyclic group C n
of order n can be realized as subgroup of SL(2, C), it is the group generated by the matrix
¶
µ
ξ 0
.
A=
0 ξ−1
The group C n is abelian, so its irreducible representations (V j , ρ j ) are all one dimensional. They are given by
ρ j : C n → GL(1, C)
A 7→ ξ j ,
for j = 0, . . . , n −1 (see also Example 3.1.14, Example 3.2.5, and Example 3.5.12). In particular the fundamental representation given by the matrix A is the representation V1 ⊕Vn−1 .
The ring of invariants R = Cu, vC n is generated by elements
X = u n , Y = uv, and Z = v n ,
which satisfy the relation Y n = X Z . Thus, the ring R is isomorphic to the surface singularity
Cx, y, z/(y n − xz),
which is called A n−1 -singularity.

4.2.2. The singularity D n+2
The binary tetrahedral group B D n is an extension of a cyclic group of order 2n by the
cyclic group C 2 . It has order 4n and n + 3 conjugacy classes. As subgroup of SL(2, C) it is
the group generated by the following matrices
µ
¶
µ
¶
ξ 0
0 i
A=
, and B =
,
0 ξ−1
i 0
where ξ := exp( 2πi
2n ) and n ≥ 2.

86

4.2. Kleinian singularities
The group B D n has 4 one-dimensional irreducible representations, and n − 1 irreducible two-dimensional representations. The one-dimensional representations (W j , ρ 0j )
are
ρ 00 : A 7→ 1, B 7→ 1, ρ 01 : A 7→ 1, B 7→ −1,
ρ 0n−1 : A 7→ −1, B 7→ i , ρ 0n : A 7→ −1, B 7→ −i .
The two-dimensional irreducible representations (V j , ρ j ) are
ρj : a →

µ j
ξ
0

¶
µ
0
0
,
b
→
7
−j
ij
ξ

ij
0

¶

for j = 1, . . . , n − 1.

Notice that the representation V1 is the fundamental representation, which gives the action of B D n on Cu, v. The corresponding invariant ring R = Cu, vB D n is generated by
polynomials
u 2n + v 2n , u 2 v 2 , and uv(u 2n − v 2n ),
if n is even, and polynomials
u 2n − v 2n , u 2 v 2 , and uv(u 2n + v 2n ),
if n is odd.
In both cases R is isomorphic to the surface singularity
Cx, y, z/(x 2 + y n+1 + y z 2 ),

called D n+2 -singularity. For n = 2 we obtain the group B D 2 of Example 3.1.15, Example
3.2.6, and Example 3.5.13.

4.2.3. The singularity E 6
The binary tetrahedral group BT is an extension of the tetrahedral group T by the
cyclic group C 2 . It has order 24 and 7 conjugacy class. Let ξ := exp( 2πi
8 ) be a primitive
8-th root of unity, then BT is generated by the matrices
¶
µ
¶
µ
¶
1 ξ ξ3
i 0
0 i
A =
, B=
, and C = p
7 .
0 −i
i 0
2 ξ ξ
2

µ

BT has only two non-trivial normal subgroups:
• the center C 2 = {±I } of order 2,
• the binary dihedral group B D 2 of order 8, generated by A 2 and B .
The character table for BT is the following

87

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities

where ζ3 =

p
−1+ 3i
2

representative
| class |
order

I
1
1

−I
1
2

B
6
4

C
4
6

C2
4
3

C4
4
3

C5
4
6

V0
V1
V2
V3
V3∨
V4
V4∨

1
2
3
2
2
1
1

1
-2
3
-2
-2
1
1

1
0
-1
0
0
1
1

1
1
0
ζ3
ζ23
ζ3
ζ23

1
-1
0
−ζ3
−ζ23
ζ3
ζ23

1
-1
0
−ζ23
−ζ3
ζ23
ζ3

1
1
0
ζ23
ζ3
ζ23
ζ3

is a third root of unity.

We point out that the one-dimensional irreducible representations V0 , V4 , V4∨ form a
cyclic group of order 3, which acts on the set of the two-dimensional representations via
tensor product. Thus, we can obtain the irreducible representations V3 and V3∨ from the
fundamental representation V1 via tensorization:
V3 = V1 ⊗ V4 and V3∨ = V1 ⊗ V4∨ .
The invariant ring R = Cu, vBT is generated by invariants
Z := uv(u 4 − v 4 ),
Y := u 8 + 14u 4 v 4 + v 8 ,
X := u 12 − 33u 8 v 4 − 33u 4 v 8 + v 12 ,
which satisfy the relation X 2 = Y 3 + 108Z 4 . Adjusting the polynomials by appropriate
roots of unity we obtain the isomorphism
R∼
= Cx, y, z/(x 2 + y 3 + z 4 ).
This is the singularity E 6 .

4.2.4. The singularity E 7
The binary octahedral group BO is an extension of the octahedral group O by the cyclic
group C 2 . It is generated by the matrices
µ 3
¶
µ
¶
¶
µ
1 ξ ξ3
ξ
0
0 i
D = A3 =
,
B
=
,
and
C
=
p
7 ,
0 ξ5
i 0
2 ξ ξ
where ξ := exp( 2πi
8 ). BO has order 48 and 8 conjugacy classes. The normal subgroups of
BO are the following
C 2  B D 2  BT  BO.

88

4.2. Kleinian singularities
As usual we denote by V1 the fundamental representation, then the character table of
BO is
representative
|class|
order

I
1
1

−I
1
2

B
6
4

C
8
6

C2
8
3

D
6
8

BD
12
4

D3
6
8

V0
V1
V2
V3
V4
V5
V6
V7

1
2
3
4
3
2
1
2

1
-2
3
-4
3
-2
1
2

1
0
-1
0
-1
0
1
2

1
1
0
-1
0
1
1
-1

1
-1
0
1
0
-1
1
-1

1
p
− 2
1
0
-1
p
2
-1
0

1
0
-1
0
1
0
-1
0

1
p
2
1
0
-1
p
− 2
-1
0

We point out that the irreducible one-dimensional representations form a cyclic group
of order 2. The two-dimensional representation V5 is obtained from the fundamental
representation via tensorization: V5 = V1 ⊗ V6 . The representation V7 is not faithful, and
is given by matrices
¶
µ
¶
¶
µ
µ
ζ3
0
1 0
0 1
, and C 7→
,
, B 7→
D 7→
0 ζ−1
0 1
1 0
3
with ζ3 =

p
−1+ 3i
.
2

Invariant polynomials for the action of BO on Cu, v are
Y = u 2 v 2 (u 4 − v 4 )2 ,
Z = u 8 + 14u 4 v 4 + v 8 ,
X = uv(u 4 − v 4 )(u 12 − 33u 8 v 4 − 33u 4 v 8 + v 12 ).
The corresponding invariant ring is the E 7 -singularity and is isomorphic to
Cx, y, z/(x 2 + y 3 + y z 3 ).

4.2.5. The singularity E 8
The binary icosahedral group B I is an extension of the icosahedral group I by the
cyclic group C 2 . The group B I has order 120, has 9 conjugacy classes, and has only one
normal non-trivial subgroup, its center C 2 .
B I is generated by the matrices
¶
µ
µ
1 ζ25 − ζ45
1 ζ45 − ζ5 ζ25 − ζ35
F=p
2
3
4 , and E = p
5 ζ5 − ζ5 ζ5 − ζ5
5 1 − ζ5

¶
ζ45 − 1
,
ζ35 − ζ5

89

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities
where ζ5 := exp( 2πi
5 ) is a primitive 5-th root of unity.
The character table for B I is the following
representative
| class |
order

I
1
1

−I
1
2

F
30
4

E
20
6

E2
20
3

FE
12
10

(F E )2
12
5

(F E )3
12
10

(F E )4
12
5

V0
V1
V2
V3
V4
V5
V6
V7
V8

1
2
3
4
5
6
4
2
3

1
-2
3
-4
5
-6
4
-2
3

1
0
-1
0
1
0
0
0
-1

1
1
0
-1
-1
0
1
1
0

1
-1
0
1
-1
0
1
-1
0

1
ϕ+
ϕ+
1
0
-1
-1
ϕ−
ϕ−

1
−ϕ−
ϕ−
-1
0
1
-1
−ϕ+
ϕ+

1
ϕ−
ϕ−
1
0
-1
-1
ϕ+
ϕ+

1
−ϕ+
ϕ+
-1
0
1
-1
−ϕ−
ϕ−

p
p
1+ 5
1− 5
−
Here ϕ =
is the golden ratio, ϕ =
, and V1 is the fundamental represen2
2
tation.
+

The two-dimensional representations V1 and V7 cannot be obtained by tensoring with
a one-dimensional representation (as it happened in the cases of BT and BO), rather
they are connected by an automorphism of B I .
The invariant ring is generated by polynomials
Z = u 11 v + 11u 6 v 6 − uv 11 ,
Y = u 20 − 228u 15 v 5 + 494u 10 v 10 + 228u 5 v 15 + v 20 ,
X = u 30 + 522u 25 v 5 − 10005u 20 v 10 − 10005u 10 v 20 − 522u 5 v 25 + v 30 ,
with the relation X 2 = Y 3 + 1728Z 5 . By adjusting the polynomials by appropriate roots
of unity, Cu, vB I is isomorphic to the surface singularity
Cx, y, z/(x 2 + y 3 + z 5 ),

which is called E 8 -singularity.

4.2.6. Kleinian singularities over arbitrary fields
Now let k be an algebraically closed field, we want to define the Kleinian singularities
over k. The matrices used to generate the Klein groups of Theorem 4.2.1 can be defined
over SL(2, k) as well, provided that the characteristic of k does not divide the order of the
group. More precisely, if |G| = n we fix an isomorphism ψ : µn (C) → µn (k), and we use ψ

90

4.2. Kleinian singularities
p
to lift the entries of the matrices generating the Klein groups in C to k. The numbers 2
p
and 5 appearing in the generators of the groups BT , BO and B I can also be lifted to k
using the following relations
p
¶
µ
¶
µ
¶
µ
1+i
4πi
6πi
−1 + 5
2πi
= p , exp
+ exp
=
exp
.
8
5
5
2
2
Theorem 4.2.8. Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0. Then the unique
finite subgroups of SL(2, k) up to isomorphism are the Klein groups.
Proof: We have already seen that the Klein groups can be realized as subgroups of SL(2, k).
Conversely, let G be a finite subgroup of SL(2, k). We prove that G is isomorphic to a subgroup of SL(2, C), and this will force G to be isomorphic to one of the Klein groups by
Theorem 4.2.1.
Since k has characteristic 0, it contains Q as subfield. Let L be the smallest field extension Q ⊆ L ⊆ k, such that the elements of G are defined over L, in other words G ⊆ SL(2, L).
The group G is finite, it follows that Q ⊆ L is a finite field extension. So there exists an isomorphism φ between L and a subfield Q(ζ) of C. Then we can extend φ to SL(2, L) in the
natural way, and obtain the required isomorphism between G and a subgroup of SL(2, C).

2

Definition 4.2.9. Let k be an algebraically closed field, and let G be a Klein group in
SL(2, k). Assume that |G| is invertible in k. A Kleinian singularity or ADE singularity over
k is the invariant ring ku, vG .
Remark 4.2.10. If k has prime characteristic it may not be true that the Klein groups
are the unique finite subgroups of SL(2, k). Thus, there may be other two-dimensional
special quotient singularites different from the Kleinian singularities.
The invariant polynomials are the same as the complex case, so the Kleinian singularities over k are hypersurface rings kx, y, z/( f ) as well.
singularity name
A n−1
D n+2
E6
E7
E8

G
cyclic
binary dihedral
binary tetrahedral
binary octahedral
binary icosahedral

f

|G|
n
4n
24
48
120

n

y − xz
x + y n+1 + y z 2
x2 + y 3 + z4
x2 + y 3 + y z3
x2 + y 3 + z5
2

Remark 4.2.11. One could use the hypersurface representation kx, y, z/( f ) to define
the Kleinian singularities also in the case where |G| and the characteristic of k are not
coprime. However one loses the ability to define the Reynolds operator and the Auslander functor. Since these are very important for our purposes, we will not consider this
situation.

91

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities
Remark 4.2.12. The Klein groups are subgroups of SL(2, k), so they are small. Therefore
the Auslander theory of Chapter 3 applies to the Kleinian singularities.
In the following theorem we summarize the properties of the Kleinian singularities.
Theorem 4.2.13. Let R = ku, vG be a Kleinian singularity. Then the following facts hold.
1. R is a Gorenstein hypersurface normal domain of dimension 2.
2. R has finite Cohen-Macaulay type.
3. R is a simple rational isolated singularity of multiplicity e(R) = 2.

4.3. The second syzygy of the residue field
In this section we study the maximal Cohen-Macaulay module Syz2R (k) of the Kleinian
singularities. In particular we want to determine its associated representation in the Auslander correspondence.
The syzygy modules of the residue field of two-dimensional hypersurfaces have been
already investigated by Kawamoto and Yoshino [YK88], and Takahashi [Tak08]. We briefly
recall their results and notations.
Let (R, m, k) be a complete two-dimensional normal non-regular domain with canonical module K R . In this setting Auslander proved in [Aus86b] that in the category Ref(R)
there exists a unique non-split short exact sequence of the form
0 → K R → E → m → 0,
which is called the fundamental sequence of R.
The module E appearing in the middle term is also unique up to isomorphism and
is called the fundamental module or Auslander module of R (cf. [Yos90, Chapter 11]).
It is a reflexive (hence MCM) module of rank 2. Moreover we have an isomorphism of
¡V ¢∗∗
∼
R-modules 2 E
= KR .
The following example clarifies the name fundamental module.
Example 4.3.1. Let V be a k-vector space of dimension 2 with basis u, v and let G ⊆
GL(2, k) be a finite subgroup. Then, G acts on the power series ring S = ku, v and we
consider the invariant ring R = S G , which is a two-dimensional quotient singularity. The
fundamental module of R is the image via Auslander functor of the fundamental representation V of G, that is
E = (S ⊗k V )G .
Now assume in addition that R is a hypersurface ring over a field k, that is R = T /( f ),
where T is a regular local ring of dimension 3 with a regular system of parameters {x, y, z}

92

4.3. The second syzygy of the residue field
and f ∈ T . Observe that the Kleinian singularities satisfy these conditions, and that in
this setting we have a short exact sequence
x,y,z

0 → Syz2R (k) → R 3 −−−→ R → k → 0,
which tells us that Syz2R (k) has rank 2.
Under the previous assumptions, Yoshino and Kawamoto [YK88] proved the following
two results.
Theorem 4.3.2 (Yoshino-Kawamoto). The fundamental module E is isomorphic to the
third syzygy of k, i.e.
E∼
= Syz3R (k).
Theorem 4.3.3 (Yoshino-Kawamoto). The following facts are equivalent.
1. The fundamental module E is decomposable.
2. R is a cyclic quotient singularity.
Now, take f x , f y and f z in T so that they satisfy f = x f x + y f y + z f z . The minimal free
resolution of the residue field k over R = T /( f ) is given as follows
C

D

C

B

A

· · · → R4 −
→ R4 −
→ R4 −
→ R4 −
→ R3 −
→ R → k → 0,
where

0 −z y
 z
0 −x 


A = (x, y, z)t , B = 
,
−y x
0
fx
fy
fz



0 −z y − f x
fz − f y x
 z
0 −x − f y 
0
fx
y



, D = 
.
−y x
− fx
0
z
0 − fz 
−y −z 0
fx
fy
fz
0




0
− f
 z
C =
 fy
−x

In a certain sense, only two modules appear in the previous exact sequence
Syz3R (k) = ker B = imC = ker D = R 4 /imD = CokerD, and
Syz2R (k) = imB = R 4 / ker B = R 4 /imC = CokerC = kerC = imD.
In fact, the couple of matrices (C , D) is a matrix factorization of the MCM module
Syz2R (k), which is equal to the cokernel of C , and the couple (D,C ) is a matrix factorization of the third syzygy of k, Syz3R (k), which is equal to the cokernel of D. For the
definition and basic properties of matrix factorizations, see [Yos90, Chapter 7].
We also point out that Syz1R (Syz2R (k)) ∼
= Syz3R (k), or equivalently the fundamental mod2
ule E is the first cosyzygy of SyzR (k). Using this relation, Takahashi [Tak08] proved an
analogous of Theorem 4.3.3 for the second syzygy of the field.

93

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities
Theorem 4.3.4 (Takahashi). Let (T, n, k) be a regular local ring, and I an ideal of T contained in n2 , and R = T /I the residue class ring. Suppose that R is a Henselian Gorenstein
ring of dimension two. Then the following facts are equivalent.
1. Syz2R (k) is decomposable.
2. dim T = 3 and I = (x y − z f ) for some regular system of parameters x, y, z of T and
f ∈ n.
As a consequence of Theorem 4.3.4 we obtain that the second syzygy module of the
field of the Kleinian singularities D n , E 6 , E 7 and E 8 is indecomposable, while for the
singularity A n is decomposable. In all cases Syz2R (k) is a MCM R-module by Proposition
1.5.16, therefore it corresponds to a k-representation of the acting group via Auslander
functor (Theorem 3.5.10). We determine explicitely which representation it is.
Theorem 4.3.5. Let (R, m, k) be a two-dimensional Kleinian singularity. Then the second
syzygy of the residue field k is isomorphic to the fundamental module, that is
Syz2R (k) ∼
= E.
From Example 4.3.1 we immediately get the following corollary.
Corollary 4.3.6. Let (R, m, k) be a two-dimensional Kleinian singularity, and let V1 be the
two-dimensional fundamental representation of the acting group G of R. Then, the second
syzygy of the residue field k is isomorphic to the image of V1 via Auslander functor, that is
Syz2R (k) ∼
= A (V1 )
We prove Theorem 4.3.5 by case considerations. We illustrate the general strategy and
prove it for the singularities A n and B D n . The computations for E 6 , E 7 and E 8 are done
with Macaulay2 [GS] and left to Appendix A.
Let S = ku, v be the powers series ring over an algebraically closed field k, and let G
be one of the Klein subgroups of SL(2, k) acting on S through a faithful representation V1 .
Assume that chark and |G| are coprime. We denote by R = S G the invariant ring, and by
mR its maximal ideal. Let p 1 , p 2 , p 3 be a minimal system of generators of mR as ideal in S.
In fact, these are the polynomials that we denoted by X , Y , and Z in the previous Section
4.2.
We consider the following short exact sequence of S-modules, which is the beginning
of an S-free resolution of S/mR S
p 1 ,p 2 ,p 3

0 → Syz1S (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 ) → S 3 −−−−−→ S → S/mR S → 0.

(4.4)

The group G acts linearly on S through the fundamental representation V1 , and this action extends naturally to S 3 , and its submodule Syz1S (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 ). In other words, the sequence (4.4) is an exact sequence of S ∗ G-modules. We apply the functor G (N ) = N G ,
which is exact, to the sequence (4.4) and we obtain an exact sequence
0 → M → R 3 → R → R/mR → 0.

94

4.3. The second syzygy of the residue field
Since p 1 , p 2 , p 3 are a system of generators for the maximal ideal mR of R, the last module on the right is a copy of the residue field. It follows that the module M appearing on
the left of the last sequence is just the second syzygy of k, that is M = Syz2R (k). In other
words we have that
Syz1S (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 )G = Syz2R (k).
So, to understand which R-module Syz2R (k) is, we need to understand which is the action
of G on Syz1S (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 ), that its S ∗ G-module structure.
We know that as S-module Syz1S (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 ) ∼
= S 2 and it is therefore generated by two
3
elements s 1 (u, v), s 2 (u, v) ∈ S . We need to keep track of the action of G through this
isomorphism. The action of G on Syz1S (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 ) is inherited by the action on S, which is
linear and given by matrices M = M g in SL(2, k). In other words, the M ’s are the matrices
of the fundamental representation of G, which we listed for each Klein group in Section
4.2.
In order to understand how these matrices act on the generators s 1 (u, v) and s 2 (u, v)
we procede as follows. For each matrix M we apply the linear transformation (u, v) 7→
M (u, v)T to s 1 (u, v) and s 2 (u, v). We obtain two elements s 10 (u, v) and s 20 (u, v) in S 3 which
belong to Syz1S (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 ). Therefore we can write them as linear combination of s 1 and
s2
µ 0¶
µ ¶
s1
s1
=N
s 20
s2
for some matrix N . In this way we obtain a collection of matrices N = N g , which give us
the representation corresponding to Syz1S (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 ).
We will show that in each case we get a representation isomorphic to the fundamental
representation, therefore by Example 4.3.1 we conclude that Syz2R (k) ∼
= E.

4.3.1. Computation of Syz2R (k) for the singularity A n−1
Let ξ be a primitive n-th root of unity in k, and consider the cyclic group C n generated
by
¶
ξ 0
A=
.
0 ξ−1
µ

The maximal ideal mR of the invariant ring R = ku, vC n is generated by polynomials
p 1 = u n , p 2 = v n , p 3 = uv. Their syzygy module Syz1S (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 ) is generated by



0
−v
s 1 =  −u  and s 2 =  0  .
v n−1
u n−1


95

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities
We apply the linear transformation given by A: u 7→ ξu, v 7→ ξ−1 v, to s 1 and s 2



0
0
 = ξ  −u  = ξs 1 ;
−ξu
s 1 7→ s 10 = 
−1 n−1 n−1
(ξ )
v
v n−1




−ξ−1 v
−v
 = ξ−1  0  = ξ−1 s 2 .
0
s 2 7→ s 20 = 
ξn−1 u n−1
u n−1


Thus, the representation corresponding to Syz1S (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 ) is exactly the fundamental
representation.

4.3.2. Computation of Syz2R (k) for the singularity D n+2
Let ξ ∈ k be a primitive 2n-th root of unity for n ≥ 2, and let i ∈ k be a primitive fourth
root of unity. The binary dihedral group G = B D n ⊆ SL(2, k) is generated by the matrices
µ

A=

ξ 0
0 ξ−1

¶

and B =

µ
¶
0 i
.
i 0

If n is even, the maximal ideal mR of the invariant subring R = ku, vB D n is generated
by polynomials p 1 = u 2n + v 2n , p 2 = u 2 v 2 and p 3 = uv(u 2n − v 2n ). The syzygy module
Syz1S (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 ) is generated by



−uv 2
−u 2 v
s 1 = 2v 2n−1  and s 2 = 2u 2n−1  .
u
−v


We apply the linear transformation A: u 7→ ξu, v 7→ ξ−1 v, and we obtain



−ξu 2 v
−u 2 v
s 1 7→ s 10 = 2(ξ−1 )2n−1 v 2n−1  = ξ 2v 2n−1  = ξs 1 ;
ξu
u




−ξ−1 uv 2
−ξ−1 uv 2
s 2 7→ s 20 = 2ξ2n−1 u 2n−1  = 2ξ−1 u 2n−1  = ξ−1 s 2 .
−ξ−1 v
−ξ−1 v


Thus, we have
µ 0¶ µ
¶µ ¶
ξ 0
s1
s1
=
.
s 20
0 ξ−1 s 2

96

4.3. The second syzygy of the residue field
For the transformation B : u 7→ i v, v 7→ i u, we have



−i 3 uv 2
i uv 2
s 1 7→ s 10 = 2i 2n−1 u 2n−1  = ξ −2i u 2n−1  = i 3 s 2 ;
iv
iv

 

3 2
2
−i u v
iu v
s 2 7→ s 20 = 2i 2n−1 v 2n−1  = −2i v 2n−1  = i 3 s 2 .
−i u
−i u


Thus, we have
µ 0¶ µ
s1
0
0 = 3
s2
i

i3
0

¶µ ¶
s1
.
s2

So the representation (V 0 , ρ 0 ) acting on Syz1S (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 ) is given by matrices
¶
µ
ξ 0
0
0
A =
−1 , B = 3
0 ξ
i
0

µ

¶
i3
.
0

This representation is isomorphic to the fundamental representation (V1 , ρ 1 ). An isomorphism between them is given by
ϕ : (V1 , ρ 1 ) → (V 0 , ρ 0 )
(x, y) 7→ (x, −y),
with associated matrix
¶
µ
1 0
.
P=
0 −1

In fact, it is easy to check that P A 0 = AP and P B 0 = B P .
Now, we consider the case where n is odd. Generators for mR are given by polynomials
p 1 = u 2n − v 2n , p 2 = u 2 v 2 , p 3 = uv(u 2n + v 2n ). The syzygy module Syz1S (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 ) is
generated by
 2 


u v
−uv 2
s 1 = 2v 2n−1  and s 2 = 2u 2n−1  .
−u
−v
We apply the linear transformation A: u 7→ ξu, v 7→ ξ−1 v, and we obtain

 2 
ξu 2 v
u v
0
−1 2n−1 2n−1 


v
s 1 7→ s 1 = 2(ξ )
= ξ 2v 2n−1  = ξs 1 ;
−ξu
−u


−1
2  
−1
−ξ uv
−ξ uv 2
s 2 7→ s 20 = 2ξ2n−1 u 2n−1  = 2ξ−1 u 2n−1  = ξ−1 s 2 .
−ξ−1 v
−ξ−1 v


97

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities
Thus, we have
µ ¶
¶µ ¶
µ 0¶ µ
s1
s1
ξ 0
s1
.
=
A
=
−1
0
s2
s2
0 ξ
s2

For the transformation B : u 7→ i v, v 7→ i u, we have


 3 2 
i 3 uv 2
i uv
0
2n−1 2n−1 


u
s 1 7→ s 1 = 2i
= ξ −2i 3 u 2n−1  = −i 3 s 2 = i s 2 ;
−i v
i 3v

 

−i 3 u 2 v
−i 3 u 2 v
s 2 7→ s 20 = 2i 2n−1 v 2n−1  = −2i 3 v 2n−1  = −i 3 s 2 = i s 2 .
−i u
i 3u
Thus, we have
µ 0¶ µ
¶µ ¶
µ ¶
s1
0 i s1
s1
=
=
B
.
s 20
i 0 s2
s2

Therefore the representation acting on Syz1S (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 ) is the fundamental representation.

4.4. Symmetric signature of Kleinian singularities
In this section we compute the symmetric signature, and the generalized symmetric signature of the Kleinian singularities over an algebraically closed field k. As already
mentioned, we will translate this into a problem in representation theory using the Auslander correspondence of Chapter 3. For this reason, let us begin with some results in
representation theory.
Lemma 4.4.1. Let ξ 6= ±1 be a root of unity in C. Then the function f : N → C
f (q) :=

q
X

ξ2t −q

t =0

is bounded.
Proof: We have
q
X

ξ2t −q = ξ−q

t =0
2

q
X

(ξ2 )t .

t =0
2

Since ξ 6= ±1, ξ is a root of unity and ξ 6= 1. Let m ≥ 2 be the order of ξ2 and write
q = d m + r , with 0 ≤ r < m, then
ξ−q

q
X
t =0

98

(ξ2 )t = ξ−r

r
X
t =0

(ξ2 )t ,

4.4. Symmetric signature of Kleinian singularities
which is periodic modulo m, hence bounded. 2
Example 4.4.2. Let (V, ρ) be a two-dimensional representation of a finite group G over
an algebraically closed field k. Since k is algebraically closed, for every element g ∈ G the
matrix ρ(g ) can be diagonalized
µ
¶
λ 0
ρ(g ) =
,
0 µ
with λ, µ ∈ k. The representation Symq (V ) evaluated
matrix
 q
λ
0
···
···
 0 λq−1 µ 0
···

 .
.
 .
..
 .


···
· · · λµq−1
0
···
···
0

at the element g is given by the

0
0

.. 

. .

0
µq

In other words, if λ and µ are the eigenvalues of V at the element g , then the eigenvalues
of Symq (V ) at g are {λt µq−t : t = 0, . . . , q}.
Lemma 4.4.3. Let k be an algebraically closed field and let G be finite group such that
chark and |G| are coprime. Let (V, ρ) be a two-dimensional representation of G whose
image is contained in SL(2, k), then the (Brauer) character of the representation Symq (V )
is given by
q
X
2t −q
λg ,
χSymq (V ) (g ) =
t =0

where λg is the lift to C of an eigenvalue of the matrix ρ(g ).
Proof: Let g ∈ G and let λg and µg be the lift to C of the eigenvalues of ρ(g ). Since ρ(g ) ∈
SL(2, k), we have µg = λ−1
g . Then the lift of the eigenvalues of g in the representation
Symq (V ) are
q−t
2t −q
{λtg · µg : t = 0, . . . , q} = {λg
: t = 0, . . . , q},
so the formula for the character of Symq (V ) follows immediately. 2
Remark 4.4.4. The character of the symmetric representation Symq (V ) can be computed also using Molien’s formula (cf. [Web14, Chapter 4, Ex.14])
+∞
X
q=0

χSymq (V ) (g )t q =

1
.
det(I − t ρ(g ))

(4.5)

Here t is an indeterminate, and the determinant on the right hand side is of a matrix with
entries conveniently lifted to the polynomial ring C[t ]. Expanding the rational function
on the right, we obtain a formal power series which is equal to the formal power series
on the left, and we can use this equality to compute the character χSymq (V ) . Notice that
Molien’s formula holds also if dimk V > 2.

99

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities
Theorem 4.4.5. Let k be an algebraically closed field and let G be a Klein subgroup of
SL(2, k), such that chark does not divide |G|. Let (V, ρ) be a two-dimensional faithful krepresentation of G with image contained in SL(2, k) and let (Vi , ρ i ) be an irreducible krepresentation of G. We denote by αi ,q (V ) the multiplicity of Vi in Symq (V ) and by βq (V ) =
dimk Symq (V ). Then
PN
dimk Vi
q=0 αi ,q (V )
lim PN
.
=
N →+∞
|G|
q=0 βq (V )
Proof: Since dimk V = 2, the dimension of Symq (V ) is q + 1. So the denominator in the
P
1
limit above is N
q=0 βq (V ) = 2 (N + 1)(N + 2).
From Corollary 3.2.10 and Lemma 4.4.3 we have
X
|G|αi ,q (V ) = 〈χSymq (V ) , χVi 〉 =
χSymq (V ) (g ) · χVi (g )
g ∈G

Ã

=

X

χVi (g )

g ∈G

q
X

!
2t −q
λg

,

t =0

where λg is the lift to C of an eigenvalue of ρ(g ). The order m g of the root of unity λg
coincides with the order of ρ(g ) in SL(2, k), since V is faithful this coincides also with
Pq
2t −q
the order of the group element g in G. If m g > 2 then the sum t =0 λg
is bounded by
Lemma 4.4.1.
If G is cyclic of even order or G is B D n , BT , BO or B I , then there are only two elements
of order ≤ 2 in G, namely I and −I . Thus, we can write the previous sum as
!
!
Ã
!
Ã
Ã
q
q
q
X
X
X
X
2t −q
2t −q
2t −q
χVi (g )
+ χVi (−I )
+ O(1)
λg
= χVi (I )
λI
λ−I
t =0

g ∈G

t =0

t =0

We have that χVi (I ) = dimk Vi and χVi (−I ) = ± dimk Vi , where the sign ± depends only
on the irreducible representation Vi . Moreover we have λI = 1 and λ−I = −1, since V is
faithful. Therefore the previous sum is equal to
Ã
!
Ã
!
q
q
X
X
q
dimk (Vi )
1 ± dimk (Vi )
(−1) + O(1)
t =0

t =0

¢
¡
= dimk (Vi ) (q + 1)(1 ± (−1)q ) + O(1),

where the term (1 ± (−1)q ) is equal to 0 or to 2 depending on the parity of q and on the
irreducible representation Vi . We sum for q running from 0 to a fixed natural number N
and we obtain
|G|

N
X

αi ,q (V ) =

q=0

q=0

=

100

N ¡
X
¡
¢
¢
dimk (Vi ) (q + 1)(1 ± (−1)q ) + O(1)

1
dimk (Vi )(N + 1)(N + 2) + O(N ).
2

4.4. Symmetric signature of Kleinian singularities
Therefore, the numerator of the limit is
N
X

αi ,q (V ) =

q=0

=
so the limit is equal to

dimk Vi
|G|

(N + 1)(N + 2) dimk Vi
+ O(N )
2|G|
N
dimk Vi X
βq (V ) + O(N ),
|G| q=0

as desired.

If G is a cyclic group of odd order, then there is only one element of order ≤ 2, the
identity I , and the computations are analogous to the previous case. 2
Remark 4.4.6. The multiplicity αi ,q (V ) can be computed also using Molien’s formula
(4.5), as showed by Springer in [Spr87]. One obtains
+∞
X

αi ,q (V )t q =

q=0

χVi (g −1 )
1 X
.
|G| g ∈G det(I − t ρ(g ))

Theorem 4.4.7. Let k be an algebraically closed field and let G be a Klein subgroup of
SL(2, k) such that chark does not divide |G|. Let R be the corresponding Kleinian singularity and let M i be an indecomposable MCM R-module. Then the generalized symmetric
signature of R with respect to M i is
s σ (R, M i ) =

rankR M i
.
|G|

Proof: We apply the Auslander correspondence of Theorem 3.5.10, and we fix M = Syz2R (k).
Let Vi be the irreducible k-representation of G such that M i = A (Vi ), and let V be the kq
representation such that A (V ) = M . Let αi ,q (M ) be the multiplicity of M i into SymR (M )∗∗
q
and let βq (M ) = rankR SymR (M )∗∗ .
From Theorem 4.1.8 we have
¡
¢
q
A 0 SymR (M )∗∗ = Symq (V ).

It follows that βq (M ) = dimk Symq (V ) and αi ,q (M ) equals the multiplicity of the representation Vi in Symq (V ). Since M is the fundamental module by Theorem 4.3.5, V is
the fundamental representation. In particular V is faithful and its image is contained in
SL(2, k), so we can apply Theorem 4.4.5 to conclude the proof. 2
Corollary 4.4.8. Let k be an algebraically closed field and let G be a Klein subgroup of
SL(2, k) such that chark does not divide |G|. The symmetric signature of the corresponding
Kleinian singularity R is
1
s σ (R) =
.
|G|

101

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities
Example 4.4.9. Consider the A n−1 -singularity R = ku, vC n over an algebraically closed
¡
¢∗∗
q
as in the definition of symmetric signature. From
field k, and let S q = SymR (Syz2R (k))
the proofs of Theorem 4.4.5 and Theorem 4.4.7, we have that rankR S q = q + 1, and
frkR S q = (q + 1)(1 + (−1)q ) + O(1) =
This shows that the limit

(
2(q + 1) + O(1)

O(1)

for q even
for q odd.

frkR S q
q→+∞ rankR S q
lim

does not exist. Specifically, in this setting the syzygy module splits as Syz2R (k) ∼
= M 1 ⊕M n−1
(with notation as in Example 3.5.12). Therefore we have
Sq∼
=

q
M
t =0

⊗q−t
M 1⊗t ⊗ M n−1 ∼
=

q
M
t =0

⊗2t −q

M1

.

4.4.1. Differential symmetric signature of Kleinian singularities
For the differential symmetric signature of Definition 2.2.15, the situation is very nice
and easy. In fact, Martsinkovsky proved in [Mar87] and [Mar90] that for two-dimensional
quotient singularities (not necessarily Kleinian or cyclic) the module of Zariski differentials Ω∗∗
is isomorphic to the fundamental module E . Therefore with the same proof of
R/k
1
for a two-dimensional Kleinian singuTheorem 4.4.7, one obtains that also s d σ (R) = |G|
larity R.
Theorem 4.4.10 (Martsinkovsky). Let (R, m, k) be a two-dimensional quotient singularity
over an algebraically closed field k, and assume that the characteristic of k does not divide
the order of the acting group. Then the module of Zariski differentials Ω∗∗
of R over k is
R/k
isomorphic to the fundamental module E .
Theorem 4.4.11. Let k be an algebraically closed field and let G be be a Klein subgroup of
SL(2, k) such that chark does not divide |G|. Then the differential symmetric signature of
the corresponding Kleinian singularity R is
s d σ (R) =

1
.
|G|

4.5. Symmetric signature of cyclic quotient singularites
The content of this section is part of a joint work with Lukas Katthän.
We fix a cyclic group C n of order n ≥ 1 with generator g , and an algebraically closed
field k, such that chark does not divide n. Let 1 ≤ a ≤ n − 1, (a, n) = 1, and consider the

102

4.5. Symmetric signature of cyclic quotient singularites
k-representation V1 ⊕ Va , given by
¶
ξ 0
,
ρ(g ) =
0 ξa
µ

where ξ is a fixed primitive n-th root of unity in k. We denote the cyclic group which
is the image of this representation by n1 (1, a). Since a is coprime with n, this is a small
subgroup of GL(2, k) of order n.
Let S = ku, v, then the invariant ring R is generated by the monomials u i v j satisfying
i +aj ∼
= 0 mod n. The indecomposable MCM modules have all rank one, and are given
by
³
´
Mt = R ui v j : i + a j ∼
= −t mod n ,
for t = 0, . . . , n −1. If (Vt , ρ t ) is the irreducible representation ρ t (g ) = ξt , then M t = A (Vt ).
See also Examples 3.1.14, 3.2.5 and 3.5.12.
Example 4.5.1. For a = n −1, the invariant ring R is the A n−1 -singularity of Section 4.2.1.
If a = 1, then R = ku n , u n−1 v, . . . , uv n−1 , v n  is the Veronese ring.
We want to compute the generalized symmetric signature s σ (R, M t ) for any indecomposable MCM R-module M t . The strategy is similar to the one used in Theorem 4.4.7 for
the Kleinian singularities, but some differences occur.
First of all, if M = Syz2R (k) and V is the k-representation associated to M , i.e. M =
A (V ), then it is no longer true that M has always rank 2 and V is two-dimensional. We
have that rankR Syz2R (k) = µ − 1, where µ is the minimal number of generators of the
maximal ideal of R, but this number can be bigger than 3. For example for the Veronese
ring of Example 4.5.1, we have µ = n + 1, therefore Syz2R (k) has rank n.
For this reason, Syz2R (k) is not isomorphic in general to the fundamental module E ,
as it happens for Kleinian singularities, since E has always rank 2. Moreover, we cannot
hope Syz2R (k) being indecomposable, because the indecomposable modules over R have
rank one.
Anyway, Theorem 4.1.8 remains true also in this setting, so the multiplicity of an inq
decomposable MCM R-module M t in the decomposition of SymR (M )∗∗ is the same as
q
the multiplicity of Vt in Sym (V ), and we can compute the last one using representation
theory of finite groups. In particular, we will prove the following theorem.
Theorem 4.5.2. Let G be an abelian group of order n, let ρ : G → GL(V ) be a faithful
k-representation of G, and let ρ t : G → GL(Vt ) be an irreducible k-representation of G.
Assume that the characteristic of k does not divide n. We denote by αt ,q (V ) the multiplicity
of Vt in Symq (V ) and βq (V ) := dimk Symq (V ). Then we have
PN

lim

N →+∞

q=0 αt ,q (V )

PN

q=0 βq (V )

=

1
.
|G|

103

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities
For the proof of the theorem, we first prove two lemmas. We start with an elementary
result from group theory.
Lemma 4.5.3. Let H ⊆ (Z/n)ν be a subgroup and let L be the kernel of the map
` : Zν → HomZ (H , Z/n)
¡
¢
P
given by x → y 7→ i x i y i . Then [Zν : L] = #H .

Proof: We first show that #H = # HomZ (H , Z/n). H is a finitely generated abelian group,
L
so it splits into a direct sum H = i Hi of cyclic groups. Moreover, every Hi has order
divisible by n. The generator of a Hi of order u can be mapped to any element whose
order divides u in Z/n, and there are exactly u such elements. Hence
Y
Y
#H = #Hi = # HomZ (Hi , Z/n) = # HomZ (H , Z/n).
i

i

Next we show that ` is surjective. We denote by 〈−, −〉 the standard scalar product, i.e.
P
`(x)(y) = i x i y i = 〈x, y〉. Let e 1 , . . . , e ν be the unit vectors of (Z/n)ν . By the elementary
divisor theorem, there exists an invertible matrix A ∈ (Z/n)ν×ν , elements α1 , . . . , αr ∈ Z/n,
r ≤ ν, and generators h 1 , . . . , h r of H , such that Ah i := αi e i for 1 ≤ i ≤ r . It is clear that
HomZ (H , Z/n) is generated by the maps ϕi sending h j to α j for j = i and all other generators to zero. But the map ϕi is the image under ` of (an arbitrary lifting to Zν of ) the
vector A t e i , where A t denotes the transpose of A:
`(A t e i )(h j ) = 〈A t e i , h j 〉 = 〈e i , Ah j 〉
= 〈e i , α j e j 〉 = α j δi j = ϕi (h j ),
where δi j is the Kronecker symbol. So the claim follows. 2
Lemma 4.5.4. Let G, (V, ρ), and (Vt , ρ t ) be as in Theorem 4.5.2, and let ν = dimk V . Then
there exists a lattice L ⊆ Zν and a 0 ∈ Zν such that
αt ,q (V ) = #{x ∈ Nν ∩ (a 0 + L) : |x| = q},
βq (V ) = #{x ∈ Nν : |x| = q},
P
and [Zν : L] = #G. Here |x| := i x i .
L
Proof: The representation V splits into one-dimensional representations V = i Vi .
Let x i be a basis vector for Vi , then SymV can be identified with the polynomial ring
k[x 1 , . . . , x ν ]. It is clear that βq (V ) = dimk Symq V equals the number of monomials of
degree q, so the claimed formula holds.
L
G acts diagonally on i Vi , so we can identify the image of G under ρ with a subgroup
G 1 ⊆ (k ∗ )ν which is isomorphic to G, since (V, ρ) is faithful. The action of G 1 is now given
by
g · xa = g a xa,

104

4.5. Symmetric signature of cyclic quotient singularites
where x a =

Q

i

a

x i i is a monomial and g a :=

Q

i

a

g i i , g = (g 1 , . . . , g ν ).

For each point a ∈ Zν , we have a one-dimensional representation ρ a : G 1 → k ∗ , ρ a (g ) =
g . So, we obtain a map
a

` : Zν → HomZ (G 1 , k ∗ )
a 7→ ρ a .
Two points a and b are mapped to the same representation if and only if a − b ∈ ker `.
Let L be the kernel of `. We claim that [Zν : L] = #G 1 . Let µn (k) ⊆ k ∗ be the group of
n-th roots of unity. The order of every element of G 1 is divisible by n, so G 1 is in fact
a subgroup of µn (k)ν . Further, every ρ a takes values in µn (k). Note that µn (k) is (not
canonically) isomorphic to Z/n and let G 2 ⊂ (Z/n)ν be the image of G 1 under such an
isomorphism. Then the map ` corresponds to the map
`˜ : Zν → HomZ (G 2 , Z/n),
³
´
X
a 7→ g 7→ a i g i ,
i

and the claim follows from the preceding Lemma 4.5.3.
Now, since [Zν : L] = #G 1 the lattice L divides Zν into #G 1 cosets. On the other hand,
there are exactly #G 1 irreducible representations, so there exists a 0 ∈ Zν such that `(a 0 )
is the representation V 0 which completes the proof. 2
Now we are ready to prove Theorem 4.5.2.
Proof of Theorem 4.5.2. Let ν := dimk V and let L ⊆ Zν and a 0 ∈ Zν be as in Lemma 4.5.4.
Further, let ∆ ⊂ Rν denote the simplex spanned by the origin and the unit vectors. By
P
Lemma 4.5.4, N
q=0 βq (V ) equals the number of lattice points in N ∆ = {N p : p ∈ ∆}, and
PN
q=0 αt ,q (V ) equals #(N ∆ ∩ (a 0 + L)).
By choosing a basis for L we find a ν × ν matrix A of full rank, such that L = A Zν .
Note that by the elementary divisor theorem, A can be diagonalized and we see that
det A = [Zν : L]. Now we compute:
PN
# (N ∆ ∩ (a 0 + L))
q=0 αt ,q (V )
lim PN
= lim
N →∞
N
→∞
#(N ∆ ∩ Zν )
q=0 βq (V )
¡
¢
1/N ν # N A −1 ∆ ∩ (A −1 a 0 + Zν )
= lim
N →∞
1/N ν #(N ∆ ∩ Zν )
¡
¢
limN →∞ 1/N ν # N A −1 ∆ ∩ (A −1 a 0 + Zν )
=
limN →∞ 1/N ν #(N ∆ ∩ Zν )
−1
Vol(A ∆) det(A −1 )Vol(∆)
1
=
=
=
Vol(∆)
Vol(∆)
det A
1
1
= ν
=
.
[Z : L] #G

105

4. Symmetric signature of quotient singularities
Now we come back to the cyclic group n1 (1, a).
Lemma 4.5.5. Let G be the cyclic group n1 (1, a) over the algebraically closed field k of characteristic coprime with n, and let R = ku, vG be the invariant ring. If M is the MCM
R-module Syz2R (k), then the corresponding k-representation via Auslander V = A 0 (M ) is
a faithful representation.
Proof: Since G has order n, it is enough to show that there exists an element of order n
in V .
Let mR be the maximal ideal of R, and let {p 1 , . . . , p µ } be a minimal system of generators
for it. In particular we choose the p i ’s among the monomials u i v j such that i + a j ∼
=0
n
n−a
mod n, and we may assume without loss of generality that p 1 = u and p 2 = u
v.
We consider the S ∗ G-module Syz1S (p 1 , . . . , p µ ), and we recall that Syz1S (p 1 , . . . , p µ )G =
Syz2R (k). We want to understand the action of G on this module. We consider the element
s = (v, u a , 0, . . . , 0) ∈ Syz1S (p 1 , . . . , p µ ) ⊆ S µ
Since (p 1 , . . . , p µ ) is a monomial ideal in S, it follows from [MS05, Proposition 3.1] that s
is a minimal generator for Syz1S (p 1 , . . . , p µ ), so it corresponds to a non-zero element of V .
µ
¶
ξ 0
Let g =
be a generator of G. Then the action of g on s is given by g · s = ξa s. Since
0 ξa
a is coprime with n, this shows that s has order n, hence the representation V is faithful.

2
Theorem 4.5.6. Let G be the group n1 (1, a) over an algebraically closed field k. Assume
that (chark, n) = 1 and let R be the cyclic quotient singularity ku, vG . Then for any indecomposable MCM R-module M t we have
s σ (R, M t ) =

1
.
|G|

¢∗∗
¡
q
Proof: Let M = Syz2R (k), let αt ,q (M ) be the multiplicity of M t in SymR (M ) , and βq (M ) =
¡
¢∗∗
q
rankR SymR (M ) . If V = A 0 (M ) and Vt = A 0 (M t ), then Vt is an irreducible representation by Theorem 3.5.10 and V is a faithful representation by Lemma 4.5.5.

From Theorem 4.1.8 we have
¡
¢
q
A 0 SymR (M )∗∗ = Symq (V ).

It follows that βq (M ) = dimk Symq (V ) and αt ,q (M ) equals the multiplicity of the representation Vt in Symq (V ). Thus the application of Theorem 4.5.2 concludes the proof.

2

If we choose M t = R in the previous theorem, we immediately get the following corollary.

106

4.5. Symmetric signature of cyclic quotient singularites
Corollary 4.5.7. Let G = n1 (1, a) over an algebraically closed field k. Assume that (chark, n) =
1 and let R be the cyclic quotient singularity ku, vG . Then the symmetric signature of R
is
1
s σ (R) =
|G|

107

5. Symmetric signature of cones over elliptic
curves
She opened strange doors that we’d
never close again.
David Bowie
Scary Monsters (And Super Creeps)

The main goal of this chapter is to investigate the symmetric signature of the coordinate ring of a plane elliptic curve over an algebraically closed field. Our intention is
motivated by the following observation.
Remark 5.0.8. We consider R = k[x, y, z]/( f ), with k an algebraically closed field of positive characteristic, and f a homogeneous non-singular polynomial of degree 3. In other
words, R is the coordinate ring of a plane elliptic curve over k. The ring R is not strongly
F-regular, and in particular its F-signature s(R) is 0 by the result of Aberbach and Leuschke
(Theorem 2.1.10). To see this, assume for simplicity that f is in Weierstrass normal form,
that is f = y 2 z − x 3 − axz 2 −bz 3 for some a, b ∈ k. This is always possible if the characteristic of k is different from 2 and 3. Then the ideal I = (x, z) is not tightly closed in R, since
y 2 6∈ I , but y 2 ∈ I ∗ . Therefore R is not strongly F-regular and s(R) = 0.
Inspired by the previous remark, we would like to prove that for such rings R also the
symmetric signature s σ (R) and the differential symmetric signature s d σ (R) are 0. The
methods we use in this situation are different from those of previous chapters, and are
of geometric nature. We will use the correspondence between graded MCM R-modules
and vector bundles over the smooth projective curve Y = ProjR to translate the problem
into geometric language. We will take advantage of this, and use Atiyah’s classification of
vector bundles over an elliptic curve to obtain results, which can then be pulled back to
the algebraic setting. Since we will use also the multiplicative structure of vector bundles,
and in particular Theorem 5.1.22 which holds in characteristic zero, we will focus mainly
on elliptic curves over the field of the complex numbers.
We prove that the differential symmetric signature of the coordinate ring R of a plane
elliptic curve is 0 (Theorem 5.2.1), but unfortunately, at the time of this writing we are not
able to compute s σ (R). However, we present two possible strategies (Sections 5.2.1 and
5.2.2) which allow us to obtain partial results and give an upper bound for the symmetric
signature, namely s σ (R) ≤ 21 . Hopefully these strategies can be completed to prove that
s σ (R) = 0.

109

5. Symmetric signature of cones over elliptic curves

5.1. Vector bundles over curves
We briefly recall some definitions and results concerning vector bundles over curves.
We assume that the reader is familiar with the concepts of varieties and sheaves, and
we will use the notations of Hartshorne’s book [Har77]. By variety we mean a complete
separated integral scheme of finite type over a field, and by curve a variety of dimension
one. All sheaves are assumed to be coherent. We will skip the proofs of most results, and
we refer to the books of Le Potier [LeP97] and Mukai [Muk03, Chapter 10], or to the notes
of Teixidor i Bigas [Tei].
Let Y be a curve over an algebraically closed field k. A vector bundle of rank r over Y is
a couple (E , π), where E is a variety and π a morphism π : E → Y called projection, such
that there exists an open covering (Ui )i ∈I of Y and isomorphisms
ϕi : π−1 (Ui ) → Ui × Ark
such that on the intersection Ui ∩U j the composition
r
r
ϕi ◦ ϕ−1
j : (Ui ∩U j ) × Ak → (Ui ∩U j ) × Ak

is given by ϕi ◦ ϕ−1
(x, v) = (x, g i , j (x)v), where g i , j (x) ∈ GL(r, k). The maps ϕi are called
j
trivializations or charts and the functions g i , j : Y → GL(r, k) are called transition functions. The vector bundle is called algebraic if the transition functions are morphisms. All
vector bundles we deal with are assumed to be algebraic, and sometimes we will refer to
them simply as bundles. A vector bundle of rank one is also called line bundle.
A morphism of vector bundles over Y is a morphism of varieties that commutes with
the projections to Y and restricts to a linear map on each fiber. The set of all morphisms
between two vector bundles E and F is denoted by Hom(E , F ). The category whose
objects are vector bundles over Y , and whose maps are morphisms between them is
denoted by VB(Y ). If Y is a smooth projective connected curve, then VB(Y ) is a KrullSchmidt category (cf. [Ati56, Theorem 3]).
A subbundle of a vector bundle is a closed subvariety which is itself a bundle and such
that the inclusion is a morphism. The usual operations on vector spaces like direct sum,
tensor product, symmetric and wedge powers extend naturally to vector bundles.
A section of a vector bundle E over an open set U ⊆ Y is a map s : U → E such that
π ◦ s = IdU . A global section is a section over U = Y . For any vector bundle E we can
define its sheaf of sections
U 7→ Γ(U , E ) := {s : U → E such that π ◦ s = IdU },
which is a locally free sheaf.
Theorem 5.1.1. Let Y be a curve and let r be a positive integer. The correspondence E 7→
Γ(−, E ) induces an equivalence of categories between the category of vector bundles of rank
r over Y and the category of locally free sheaves of rank r on Y .

110

5.1. Vector bundles over curves
Proof: See [Har77, Ex. II 5.18]. 2
Having this identification in mind, we will use indifferently the words vector bundle
and locally-free sheaf. For example, we will use the notation for the structure sheaf O Y
of Y also to denote the trivial bundle of rank one corresponding to it. Nevertheless, we
point out that the notions of subbundle and (locally-free) subsheaf are different. For
example, the structure sheaf O Y has in general many subsheaves, but no non-trivial subbundle.
In the equivalence of Theorem 5.1.1 line bundles correspond to invertible sheaves. If
Y is a smooth projective curve, these correspond also to (Cartier) divisors via the map
which sends every divisor D to the sheaf O Y (D). Finally, we mention the fact that the
usual constructions on vector bundles such as tensor, symmetric and wedge products
correspond to the same constructions in the category of locally free sheaves.
Lemma 5.1.2. Let 0 → E → F → G → 0 be a short exact sequence of coherent sheaves over
Y . If F and G are locally free, then E is also locally free.
Proof: Let P be a point of Y and consider the corresponding short exact sequence 0 →
E → F → G → 0 of finitely generated modules over the stalk O P . Since F and G are locally
free, the modules F and G are free. So the sequence splits, and E is a direct summand of
a free module F , hence it is projective. Since O P is a Noetherian local ring, E is also free
by Theorem 1.4.4. 2
The dual of a vector bundle E is the bundle E ∨ := Hom(E , O Y ). From ordinary properties of vector spaces one has that E ∨∨ is canonically isomorphic to E . If E has rank r ,
then the determinant of E is the line bundle
det E :=

r
^

E.

Remark 5.1.3. Since every vector bundle E is canonically isomorphic to its double dual
E ∨∨ , reflexive symmetric powers Symq (−)∨∨ coincide with ordinary symmetric powers
Symq (−) in the category VB(Y ).
Apart from direct sums, tensor, symmetric and wedge products, one of the most useful
ways to construct a vector bundle from other bundles is via extensions. We say that a
vector bundle E is an extension of the bundle E 2 by the bundle E 1 if there is an exact
sequence
0 → E 1 → E → E 2 → 0.

(5.1)

If the previous sequence splits, then the extension is said to be trivial and E is isomorphic to the direct sum E 1 ⊕ E 2 . Two extensions E and E 0 coming from sequences of the
form (5.1) are called equivalent if there exists an isomorphism ϕ : E → E 0 such that the

111

5. Symmetric signature of cones over elliptic curves
following diagram commutes
E1

0

id

E1

0

E

E2
ϕ

E0

0

id

E2

0.

Theorem 5.1.4. Let E 1 and E 2 be two vector bundles, then the extensions of E 2 by E 1 modulo the equivalence defined above correspond bijectively to the elements of Ext1 (E 2 , E 1 ).
Proof: See [Rot09, Theorem 7.30]. 2
From now on, we assume that Y is a smooth projective curve. We want to define the
degree of a vector bundle E . If E is a line bundle, then there exists a unique (up to linear
equivalence) divisor D which corresponds to E , then we define deg E := deg D. If the rank
of E is greater than 1, we define deg E := deg(det E ), the degree of the determinant.
Lemma 5.1.5. Let Y be a smooth projective curve. Then the degree map deg : VB(Y ) → Z
satisfies the following properties.
1. If 0 → E 0 → E → E 00 → 0 is a short exact sequence of vector bundles over Y then
deg E = deg E 0 + deg E 00 .
2. If E 1 and E 2 are two vector bundles of ranks r 1 and r 2 then
deg(E 1 ⊗ E 2 ) = r 1 deg(E 2 ) + r 2 deg(E 1 ).
Proof: See [Har77, Ex. II 6.12] 2
Theorem 5.1.6 (Riemann-Roch for vector bundles). Let E be a vector bundle of rank r
over a smooth projective curve Y , then
deg(E ) = χ(E ) − r χ(O Y ),
where χ(−) denotes the Euler-Poincaré characteristic, i.e. χ(E ) := h 0 (E ) − h 1 (E ).
deg E

Definition 5.1.7. The slope of a vector bundle E on a curve Y is defined as µ(E ) := rank E .
A bundle E is said to be semistable (resp. stable) if for every proper subbundle F ⊂ E one
has µ(F ) ≤ µ(E ) (resp. µ(F ) < µ(E )).
Proposition 5.1.8. Let E be a vector bundle on Y of slope µ. Then the following facts are
equivalent.
1. E is semistable.
2. For every non-zero coherent sheaf F ⊆ E we have µ(F ) ≤ µ.
3. For every non-zero quotient coherent sheaf F 0 of E we have µ(F 0 ) ≥ µ.
From Lemma 5.1.5 we immediately obtain the following lemma.

112

5.1. Vector bundles over curves
Lemma 5.1.9. Let Y be a smooth projective curve. Then the following facts hold.
1. If 0 → E 0 → E → E 00 → 0 is a short exact sequence of vector bundles over Y of ranks
r 0 , r and r 00 respectively, then
µ(E ) =

µ(E 0 )r 0 + µ(E 00 )r 00
.
r

2. If E 1 and E 2 are two vector bundles of ranks r 1 and r 2 then
µ(E 1 ⊗ E 2 ) = µ(E 1 ) + µ(E 2 ).
We apply the definitions of simple and indecomposable objects of an abelian category
from Chapter 1 to the category of vector bundles VB(Y ). A vector bundle E is simple if its
only proper subbundle is the zero bundle, or equivalently Hom(E , E ) = k. E is indecomposable if it cannot be written as direct sum of two non-zero subbundles. We have the
following implications:
indecomposable ⇐= simple ⇐= stable =⇒ semistable.
The fact that a simple object is indecomposable holds in every abelian category and the
implication stable =⇒ semistable follows directly from the definition. For the fact that
stable vector bundles are simple see [Muk03, Corollary 10.25]. We point out that the
reverse arrows do not hold in general.
Proposition 5.1.10. Let Y be a smooth projective curve, let E be a vector bundle and L a
line bundle over Y . Then the following facts hold.
1) Symq (E ⊗ L ) ∼
= Symq (E ) ⊗ L ⊗q .
q
2) µ(Sym (E )) = q · µ(E ).
3) If the field k has characteristic 0 and E is semistable, then Symq (E ) is also semistable.
Proof: Property 1) is a standard fact of symmetric powers, and for 2) and 3) see [LeP97,
Theorem 10.2.1]. 2

5.1.1. Syzygies of vector bundles
Let R be a normal standard graded domain of dimension 2 over a field k, that is R 0 = k
and R is generated by finitely many elements of degree 1. The normal assumption on R
implies that R p is a regular ring for every prime ideal p 6= R + . It follows that the projective
variety Y = ProjR is a smooth projective curve over k. For every graded module M we
 are invertible
f the corresponding coherent sheaf on Y . The sheaves R(n)
denote by M
(cf. [Har77, Proposition II.5.12]) and denoted by O Y (n). Moreover, every MCM graded
R-module M is locally free on the punctured spectrum, so the associated coherent sheaf
f is in fact a vector bundle over Y . If we denote by MCMZ (R) the category of finitely
M
generated graded MCM R-modules, then we have a functor
e: MCMZ (R) → VB(Y ),

113

5. Symmetric signature of cones over elliptic curves
whose properties we collect in the following proposition.
Proposition 5.1.11. Let R be a normal standard graded domain of dimension 2 over a
field k, let Y = ProjR, and let M and N be finitely generated graded MCM R-modules.
Then the following facts hold.
â
f⊕ N
e;
1) M
⊕N ∼
=M
∼
∼M
e;
f ⊗O N
2) M R N =
Y

∼
q

q

f).
3) SymR (M )∗∗ ∼
= SymY (M

Proof: These statements follow from the corresponding statements on the punctured
spectrum U = D(R + ). Then, property 1) is straightforward, and 2) is a consequence of
Corollary 1.5.25. We check 3).
Since symmetric powers commute with sheafification and from Remark 1.5.24, we
have
¯
¯
¯
¯
q f ∼
q
q
∗∗ ¯
¯
SymU (M ) = SymR (M )¯ = SymR (M ) ¯

∼ ∼
U

U

as required. 2
Now we give an appropriate definition of free rank for the category of vector bundles
over Y .
Definition 5.1.12. Let E be a vector bundle over Y with a fixed very ample invertible
sheaf O Y (1). We define the free rank of E as
n
M
©
frkOY (1) (E ) := max n : ∃ a split surjection ϕ : E  F, with F =
O Y (−d i )
i =1

ª
a splitting vector bundle of rank n .

Since the category VB(Y ) has the KRS property, to compute the free rank of a bundle E ,
one should count how many copies of twisted structure sheaves O Y (−d i ) appear in the
decomposition of E into indecomposable bundles. For this reason, the free rank of vector
gr
bundles frkOY (1) agrees with the graded free rank frkR of Definition 1.1.19, as explained
in the following corollary.
Corollary 5.1.13. Let R be a normal standard graded domain of dimension 2 over a field k,
let Y = ProjR, and let M be a finitely generated graded MCM R-module. Then the following
facts hold.
f.
1. rankR M = rankOY M
gr
f.
2. frkR M = frkOY (1) M

Remark 5.1.14. Let I be an R + -primary homogeneous ideal with homogeneous generators f 1 , . . . , f n of degrees d i . The following presentation of R/I
n
M
i =1

114

f 1 ,..., f n

R(−d i ) −−−−−→ R → R/I → 0

5.1. Vector bundles over curves
induces a short exact sequence of sheaves on Y
0→S →

n
M

O Y (−d i ) → O Y → 0,

i =1

L
where R/I corresponds to 0 because I is R + -primary. Since O Y and ni=1 O Y (−d i ) are
locally free, the sheaf S is also locally free by Lemma 5.1.2. The sheaf S is the kernel of
the sheaf morphism f 1 , . . . , f n and is denoted by Syz( f 1 , . . . , f n ) and called syzygy bundle.
In fact, it is nothing but the vector bundle corresponding to the MCM graded R-module
Syz2R (R/I ) = Syz1R ( f 1 , . . . , f n ).

Syzygies of the irrelevant maximal ideal R + play a special role, they correspond to the
restriction of the cotangent bundle ΩPn of Pn to the curve. In fact, it follows from the
Euler sequence on Pn [Har77, Theorem 8.13]
0 → ΩPn →

n
M

O Pn (−1) → O Pn → 0,

i =0

that ΩPn is a syzygy bundle. So if x 0 , . . . , x n is a system of generators for O Pn (1), we have
the isomorphism
Syz(x 0 , . . . , x n ) ∼
= ΩPn .
If we restrict these bundles to the curve Y , we obtain isomorphic bundles. In fact, we
have just proved the following proposition.
Proposition 5.1.15. Let Y be a smooth projective curve with an embedding in Pn given
by ϕ : Y → Pn . Let x 0 , . . . , x n be a system of generators of O Pn (1) and denote by ΩPn the
cotangent bundle of Pn and by ΩPn |Y its restriction to Y . Then, we have the following
isomorphism of vector bundles on Y
Syz(x 0 , . . . , x n )|Y ∼
= ΩPn |Y .

5.1.2. Vector bundles over elliptic curves
Since the category of vector bundles over a smooth projective curve has the KRS property, the problem of finding its indecomposable objects arises naturally. This may be a
difficult task in general, however for a curve of genus 0 the situation is quite simple.
Theorem 5.1.16 (Grothendieck). The indecomposable objects of VB(P1 ) are those of the
form O P1 (a) for some integer a. Then, every vector bundle on P1 can be uniquely decomposed as
O (a 1 ) ⊕ · · · ⊕ O (a r )
for some integers a 1 ≥ · · · ≥ a r .

115

5. Symmetric signature of cones over elliptic curves
The next interesting case is a curve of genus 1, that is an elliptic curve. The situation here is more complicated, but still it is possible to give a complete description of
the indecomposable objects of VB(Y ) for an elliptic curve Y over an algebraically closed
field. This was done by Atiyah in his wonderful paper [Ati57]. Moreover, he was able
to understand the multiplicative structure of the monoid VB(Y ) with the tensor product
operation if the field has characteristic zero.
We will illustrate Atiyah’ s results, but we will omit proofs. The interested reader may
consult the original paper [Ati57] or the notes of Teixidor i Bigas [Tei].
Let Y be an elliptic curve over an algebraically closed field k with structure sheaf O .
We fix a line bundle A on Y of degree 1. This is equivalent to fix a point P 0 as neutral
element for the group operation on Y , in fact A = O (P 0 ). For every positive integer r
and every d ∈ Z, we denote by E (r, d ) the set of isomorphism classes of indecomposable
vector bundles on Y of rank r and degree d . First, we are going to describe E (r, 0).
Theorem 5.1.17 (Atiyah). For every positive integer r there exists a unique indecomposable vector bundle F r in E (r, 0) with Γ(Y , F r ) 6= 0. Moreover, the following facts hold.
1. F r has only one section up to scalar multiplication, i.e. Γ(Y , F r ) ∼
= k.
∨
∼
2. F r = F r .
3. There is a non-split exact sequence
0 → O → F r → F r −1 → 0.
4. Symq (F 2 ) ∼
= F q+1 .
5. If E is an indecomposable vector bundle of rank r and degree 0 then E ∼
= L⊗F r , where
L is a line bundle of degree zero, unique up to isomorphism and such that L ∼
= det E .
Proof: These are Theorem 5 (and subsequent corollaries), and Theorem 9 of [Ati57]. 2
We call the bundle F r Atiyah bundle of rank r . Clearly we have that F 1 = O , the structure sheaf is the unique line bundle of degree 0 with non-zero sections. The bundle F 2 is
given by the unique non-trivial extension
0 → O → F 2 → O → 0.
In other words, F 2 is the non-zero element of Ext1 (O , O ).
For a plane elliptic curve we can give another description of F 2 using syzygy bundles.
Proposition 5.1.18. Let Y be a plane elliptic curve over a field k of characteristic ≥ 5 with
coordinate ring k[x, y, z]/( f ), where f is a homogeneous polynomial of degree 3. Then we
have
µ
¶
∂f ∂f ∂f
∼ F2 .
Syz
,
,
(3) =
∂x ∂y ∂z

116

5.1. Vector bundles over curves
Proof: It is enough to show that Syz

³

∂f ∂f ∂f
∂x , ∂y , ∂z

´

(3) corresponds to a non-zero element of

1

Ext (O , O ) with global sections, then the uniqueness of F 2 will imply the desired isomorphism.
We consider the following injective map of sheaves, ϕ : O → O (+1)⊕3 , given by ϕ(1) =
(x, y, z). From the Euler formula
∂f
∂f
∂f
x+
y+
z = 3f ,
∂x
∂y
∂z
which
´ on Y , we obtain that the image of ϕ is contained in the syzygy bundle
³ vanishes
∂f ∂f ∂f
Syz ∂x , ∂y , ∂z (3). Actually, since this image does not vanish anywhere, it defines a subbundle and hence also a quotient bundle, which is by rank and degree reasons the structure sheaf. In other words, we have the following short exact sequence of vector bundles
¶
µ
∂f ∂f ∂f
ϕ
,
,
(3) → O → 0,
(5.2)
0→O −
→ Syz
∂x ∂y ∂z
It remains to prove that the sequence (5.2) is non-split, equivalently (x, y, z) is the
unique non-zero global section. This can be done easily by explicit computations, for
example assuming that f is in Weierstrass normal form. 2

Corollary 5.1.19. Let Ω
R/k be the sheaf version of the cotangent module ΩR/k of the cone
R of Y , then we have an isomorphism of vector bundles

∼

Ω
R/k (−1) = F 2 .
Proof: We recall that the cotangent module ΩR/k is the graded R-module
µ
¶
∂f
∂f
∂f
ΩR/k =< dx, dy, dz > /
dx +
dy +
dz .
∂x
∂y
∂z
In other words, ΩR/k can be defined by the following short exact sequence of graded Rmodules
ψ
ϕ
0 → R(−2) −
→ R ⊕3 −
→ ΩR/k → 0,
(5.3)
³
´
∂f ∂f ∂f
where ψ(1) = ∂x , ∂y , ∂z , and ϕ sends the canonical basis to dx, dy, dz.
Sequence (5.3) induces a short exact sequence of locally free sheaves on Y

0 → O Y (−2) → O Y⊕3 → Ω
R/k → 0.

We dualize this sequence and we get
∨
⊕3

0→Ω
R/k → O Y → O Y (2) → 0,

where the last map is given by ψ. We obtain that
µ
¶
∂f ∂f ∂f
∨∼

ΩR/k = Syz
,
,
(2).
∂x ∂y ∂z

117

5. Symmetric signature of cones over elliptic curves
∨

∼

So by the previous Proposition 5.1.18 we have Ω
R/k (1) = F 2 on Y , but the Atiyah bundle
∨∼
∼

F 2 is self-dual, so we have ΩR/k (−1) = F 2 = F 2 . 2
Now that the elements of E (r, 0) have been described, we have two fundamental ways
to produce the elements of E (r, d ): tensoring with the line bundle A and taking extensions. Given a positive integer r and d ∈ Z, Atiyah constructs a map
αr,d : E (h, 0) → E (r, d )
where h = (r, d ) is the highest common factor of r and d . The map αr,d is defined by the
following properties:
1. αr,0 is the identity;
2. αr,d +r (E ) ∼
= αr,d (E ) ⊗ A for every E ∈ E (h, 0);
3. if 0 < d < r and E ∈ E (h, 0) then αr,d (E ) is the non-trivial extension
0 → O d → αr,d (E ) → αr −d ,d (E ) → 0.
Theorem 5.1.20 (Atiyah). The map αr,d : E (h, 0) → E (r, d ) is well-defined and gives a oneone correspondence between E (h, 0) and E (r, d ). Moreover we have det αr,d (E ) ∼
= det E ⊗
Ad .
Proof: See Theorem 7 of [Ati57]. 2
For every rank r and degree d we define an indecomposable vector bundle E A (r, d ) as
the image of the Atiyah bundle F h via the map αr,d , that is
E A (r, d ) := αr,d (F h ).
Like Atiyah bundles, also bundles E A (r, d ) have some special properties.
Corollary 5.1.21. Let h = (r, d ) = 1 and let E ∈ E (r, d ). Then the following facts hold.
1.
2.
3.
4.

There exists a line bundle L of degree 0 such that E ∼
= E A (r, d ) ⊗ L .
E A (r, d ) ⊗ L ∼
= E A (r, d ) if and only if L ⊗r ∼
= O.
E A (r, d )∨ ∼
= E A (r, −d ).
det E A (r, d ) ∼
= A ⊗d .

Now we look at the multiplicative structure of vector bundles over Y with tensor product.
Theorem 5.1.22 (Atiyah). If the characteristic of the field k is 0, then the following relations hold.
1) If r ≥ s, then F r ⊗ F s ∼
= F r −s+1 ⊕ F r −s+3 ⊕ · · · ⊕ F r +s−1 .
2) If (r, d ) = 1, then E A (r, d ) ⊗ F h ∼
= E A (r h, d h).
0
0 0
3) If (r, r ) = (r, d ) = (r , d ) = 1, then E A (r, d ) ⊗ E A (r 0 , d 0 ) ∼
= E A (r r 0 , r d 0 + r 0 d ).

118

5.2. Symmetric signature of elliptic curves
4) If a 1 > a 2 , (d 1 , p) = (d 2 , p) = 1, then
E A (p a1 , d 1 ) ⊗ E A (p a2 , d 2 ) ∼
= O p a2 ⊗ E A (p a1 , d 1 + p a2 −a1 d2 ).
5) If (d 1 , p) = (d 2 , p) = 1, then
b
E A (p a , d 1 ) ⊗ E A (p a , d 2 ) ∼
= Op ⊗

¡M

¢
L i ⊗ E A (p b , d 3 ),

where p a−b = (p a , d 1 + d 2 ), d 3 = (d 1 + d 2 )/p a−b and the L i ’s are line bundles of degree 0
and order p a taken modulo the class of elements of order p b .
6) If L is a line bundle of degree 0 and h = (r, d ), then E A (r, d ) ⊗ L ∼
= E A (r, d ) if and only
if L ⊗r /h ∼
= O with h = (r, d ).
Proof: These are Theorem 10, Theorem 13, and Theorem 14 of [Ati57]. 2
Theorem 5.1.22 allows us to compute the tensor product of every two indecomposable
vector bundles E A (r 1 , d 1 ) and E A (r 2 , d 2 ). First, if (r i , d i ) = h i > 1 we apply 2) and we
r d
write E A (r i , d i ) ∼
= F hi ⊗ E A ( hii , hii ). Then we reduce to the situation where the ranks of
the bundles E A (−, −) are a power of a prime using 3). So we can multiply these bundles
using 4) and 5) if the primes are the same, and 3) if not. We can also multiply the Atiyah
bundles using 1). Finally, using 2) and 3) we can write the final product as a sum of
indecomposable bundles.

5.2. Symmetric signature of elliptic curves
We would like to compute the symmetric signature s σ (R) of the coordinate ring R of
a plane elliptic curve over an algebraically closed field k. So we fix the following setting.
Let f be a homogeneous non-singular polynomial f of degree 3 in k[x, y, z], and let R =
k[x, y, z]/( f ). Then R is a normal standard graded k-domain of dimension 2 and the
projective curve Y = ProjR is a plane elliptic curve over k.
To compute the symmetric signature of R one should consider reflexive symmetric
powers of the second syzygy of the residue field, Syz2R (k). Thanks to Remark 5.1.14 and
Proposition 5.1.11 this is equivalent to consider the syzygy bundle Syz(x, y, z) over Y and
taking ordinary symmetric powers in the category VB(Y ). We recall that by Corollary
f and frkgr M = frkO (1) M
f for every MCM graded R5.1.13 we have rankR M = rankOY M
Y
R
module. Therefore, we have that s σ (R) exists if and only if the limit
PN

q
q=0 frkO Y (1) Sym (Syz(x, y, z))
lim P
N →+∞ N rankO Symq (Syz(x, y, z))
Y
q=0

exists, and in this case they coincide.
The same reasoning applies to the differential symmetric signature. In this case, we
should consider the sheaf associated to the module of Zariski differentials Ω∗∗
on Y and
R/k

119

5. Symmetric signature of cones over elliptic curves
then take ordinary symmetric powers in the category VB(Y ). In other words, we consider
the vector bundles
q ¡¢
SymY Ω
R/k .
q

Notice that we can forget about the double dual inside SymY (−), thanks to Remark 2.2.16
and Proposition 5.1.11. The differential symmetric signature of the coordinate ring R
exists if and only if the limit
PN
q ¡¢
q=0 frkO Y (1) SymY ΩR/k
lim P
(5.4)
¡
¢

N →+∞ N rankO Symq Ω
R/k
Y
q=0
Y
exists, and in this case they coincide.
We can compute the differential symmetric signature of the cone R..
Theorem 5.2.1. Let Y be a plane elliptic curve over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic ≥ 5 with coordinate ring R. Then the differential symmetric signature of R is
s d σ (R) = 0.
Proof: By the previous observations we should compute the limit (5.4). From Corollary
∼

5.1.19, we have Ω
R/k = F 2 ⊗ O Y (1). Therefore from part 4) of Theorem 5.1.17 and from
Proposition 5.1.10 we obtain
q ¡¢∼
q
∼
SymY Ω
R/k = SymY (F 2 ) ⊗ O Y (q) = F q+1 ⊗ O Y (q)
q ¡¢
for all q ≥ 1. So the module SymY Ω
R/k is indecomposable, and in particular it has free
rank 0 and the claim follows. 2
For the rest of the chapter we concentrate on the symmetric signature of the cone R,
and we work over the field of the complex numbers C. First, we investigate the sygygy
bundle Syz(x, y, z).
Proposition 5.2.2. The vector bundle Syz(x, y, z) is stable of rank 2 and degree −9. Moreover det Syz(x, y, z) = O Y (−3).
Proof: The syzygy bundle fits into a short exact sequence
0 → Syz(x, y, z) →

3
M

x,y,z

O Y (−1) −−−→ O Y → 0.

(5.5)

i =1

So from the additivity of rank and degree, we immediately get that Syz(x, y, z) has rank 2
and degree
!
Ã
3
M
deg Syz(x, y, z) = deg
O Y (−1) − deg O Y deg Y = −3 deg Y = −9.
i =1

For the indecomposable property, we have that Syz(x, y, z) equals the restriction of
the cotangent bundle ΩP2 of P2 to Y by Proposition 5.1.15. This bundle is stable, and
in particular indecomposable, by the result of Brenner and Hein [BH06, Theorem 1.3].
Finally, taking determinants of sequence (5.5) yields det Syz(x, y, z) = O Y (−3). 2

120

5.2. Symmetric signature of elliptic curves
Remark 5.2.3. Since Syz(x, y, z) is indecomposable of rank 2 one would be tempted to
write Syz(x, y, z) ∼
= F 2 ⊗L for some line bundle L of degree 0 and then apply the formula
Symq (F 2 ) ∼
= F q+1 as in the proof of Theorem 5.2.1. However, such a decomposition does
not hold. For example, observe that deg Syz(x, y, z) = −9 and deg F 2 ⊗ L is always even
by Lemma 5.1.5.
Remark 5.2.4. Since Syz(x, y, z) has rank 2, we have that rankOY Symq (Syz(x, y, z)) = q +1.
The difficult part is to determine the free rank of Symq (Syz(x, y, z)).
Corollary 5.2.5. Let q be odd, then the bundle Symq (Syz(x, y, z)) contains no subbundle
of rank one. In particular, frkOY (1) Symq (Syz(x, y, z)) = 0.
Proof: From Proposition 5.1.10 and Proposition 5.2.2 we know that Symq (Syz(x, y, z)) is
semistable of slope − 92 q. Let L be a non-zero subbundle of rank one. Since Symq (Syz(x, y, z))
is semistable, we have µ(L ) = − 92 q, but µ(L ) = deg L must be an integer. Since q is odd
we get a contradiction. 2
Corollary 5.2.6. If the symmetric signature of R exists, then s σ (R) ≤ 12 .
Proof: For every q ∈ N, let a q = frkOY (1) Symq (Syz(x, y, z)), and let b q = rankOY Symq (Syz(x, y, z)).
From the previous Corollary 5.2.5 and Remark 5.2.4, we have a q = 0 for q odd, and
b q = q + 1 for all q.
For every even q we have the following inequalities
1
1
a q + a q+1 = a q ≤ b q = (b q + b q ) ≤ (b q + b q+1 ).
2
2
It follows that

PN

q=0 a q
PN
q=0 b q

where φ(N ) =

b
PN N

q=0 b q

≤

1 PN
2 q=0 b q
PN
q=0 b q

+ φ(N ) =

1
+ φ(N ),
2

if N is even, and 0 otherwise. In both cases φ(N ) → 0 if N → +∞, so

the claim is proved. 2
Now we outline two possible strategies to compute the free rank of Symq (Syz(x, y, z))
and understand the decomposition of Symq (Syz(x, y, z)) into irreducible bundles also for
even q.

5.2.1. Strategy 1: Symq as subbundle of T q
Let E be a vector bundle over Y and let q a positive integer. The q-th symmetric powers
of E can be seen as the invariant subvector space of the q-th tensor product T q (E ) :=
E ⊗ · · · ⊗ E under the action of the symmetric group Sq on q elements. Thus, we have an
inclusion
Symq (E ) ,→ T q (E ).

121

5. Symmetric signature of cones over elliptic curves
Since we are in characteristic zero, the previous inclusion splits. A splitting is given by
the Reynolds operator associated to the group action of Sq . It follows that Symq (E ) is a
direct summand of T q (E ). In particular, direct summands of Symq (E ) are precisely the
direct summands of T q (E ) which are invariant under the action of Sq .
We apply the previous observations to the bundle E = Syz(x, y, z), and we outline the
following strategy.
1) Write down the decomposition of T q (E ) into indecomposable bundles using Theorem 5.1.22.
2) Find which indecomposable summands of T q (E ) are invariant under the action of
Sq .
3) Count how many bundles of the form O Y (a) appear in the previous decomposition
and compute frkOY (1) Symq (E ).
Part 1) will be done in the following Proposition 5.2.7, while part 2) and 3) are still work
in progress at the time of this writing.
Proposition 5.2.7. Let E = Syz(x, y, z) on Y , and let q > 1 be an integer. Then, the bundle
T q (E ) decomposes as follows.
1) If q is even, T q (E ) is a sum of line bundles, each one being of the form
9

L i ⊗ A ⊗− 2 q ⊗ L ⊗q .
Here L i is a line bundle of degree 0 and order 2, that is L i ⊗ L i ∼
= O , and L is the unique
line bundle of degree 0 such that Syz(x, y, z) ∼
E
(2,
−9)
⊗
L
.
= A
2) If q is odd, T q (E ) is a sum of indecomposable vector bundles of rank two, each one
being of the form
L i ⊗ E A (2, d ) ⊗ L ⊗q .
9

Here L i and L are as in 1), and d = −9 + 2 2 (q−1) .
Proof: We recall that by Corollary 5.1.21 there exists a unique line bundle L of degree 0
such that Syz(x, y, z) ∼
= E A (2, −9) ⊗ L . First, we consider the case q = 2. From Theorem
5.1.22 we have
Syz(x, y, z) ⊗ Syz(x, y, z) ∼
= E A (2, −9) ⊗ E A (2, −9) ⊗ L ⊗2
∼
=

3
M
i =0

L i ⊗ E A (1, −9) ⊗ L ⊗2 =

3
M

L i ⊗ A ⊗−9 ⊗ L ⊗2 ,

i =0

where the bundles L 0 = O , L 1 , L 2 and L 3 are the four degree 0 line bundles of order 2
corresponding to the four 2-torsion points of Y (cf. [Sil86, Theorem 6.1]).

122

5.2. Symmetric signature of elliptic curves
For q > 2 even, we write
q

T q (E ) = (T 2 (E ))⊗ 2
Ã
!⊗ q
2
3
M
∼
L i ⊗ A ⊗−9 ⊗ L ⊗2
=
i =0

∼
=

M

³

´
9
L i 1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ L i q ⊗ A ⊗− 2 q ⊗ L ⊗q
2

i t ∈{0,...,3}

∼
=

M

Li ⊗ A

⊗− 92 q

⊗ L ⊗q ,

where the last isomorphism follows from the fact that every product of the form L i 1 ⊗· · ·⊗
L i q is isomorphic to one of the bundles L i . Therefore, we have four different kinds of line
2

bundles appearing as summand in T q (E ), whose rank is equal to 2q .
Finally, for q odd we have
T q (E ) = T q−1 (E ) ⊗ E
M
9
∼
L i ⊗ A ⊗− 2 (q−1) ⊗ L ⊗q−1 ⊗ E A (2, −9) ⊗ L
=
M
¢
¡
9
∼
L i ⊗ L ⊗q ⊗ E A 1, − (q − 1) ⊗ E A (2, −9).
=
2
¡
¢
Computing the product E A 1, − 92 (q − 1) ⊗ E A (2, −9) with Theorem 5.1.22 we obtain the
9

indecomposable bundle E A (2, d ) of degree d = −9 + 2 2 (q−1) . 2

Question 5.2.8. Can we use Proposition 5.2.7 to get an upper bound for s σ (R)?
Example 5.2.9. We give a better description of the case q = 2. From Proposition 5.2.7 we
have that
T 2 (E ) ∼
= (O Y ⊕ L 1 ⊕ L 2 ⊕ L 3 ) ⊗ A ⊗−9 ⊗ L ⊗2 ,
where E = Syz(x, y, z). So T 2 (E ) decompose as the sum of four line bundles. Of those,
only one can be of the form O Y (a). On the other hand, we know that
T 2 (E ) = Sym2 (E ) ⊕
and

V2

2
^
(E ),

(E ) ∼
= O Y (−3) by Proposition 5.2.2. It follows that frkOY (1) Sym2 (Syz(x, y, z)) = 0.

5.2.2. Strategy 2: an upper bound for frkOY (1)
This strategy should allow us to obtain an upper bound for frkOY (1) Symq (Syz(x, y, z)).
Our hope is that this upper bound is actually 0. The main idea is to use the following
lemma.

123

5. Symmetric signature of cones over elliptic curves
ϕ

Lemma 5.2.10. Let 0 → S → F −
→ L → 0 be a short exact sequence of locally free sheaves
on a smooth curve, with L a line bundle. Then, for every q ≥ 1 we have a short exact
sequence
0 → Symq (S ) → Symq (F ) → Symq−1 (F ) ⊗ L → 0.
In particular, the last non-zero map is given by
s 1 ◦ · · · ◦ s q 7→

q
X

s 1 ◦ · · · ◦ ŝ i ◦ · · · s q ⊗ ϕ(s i ).

i =1

Proof: This follows from the long exact sequence of divided powers (cf. [Eis94, Appendix
A2]). The reader may consult also [Sak78, Proposition 3]. 2
Our strategy is the following. We apply Lemma 5.2.10 to the syzygy sequence
0 → Syz(x, y, z) →

3
M

x,y,z

O Y (−1) −−−→ O Y → 0,

i =1

and obtain a short exact sequence of vector bundles on Y
Ã
!
Ã
!
3
3
M
M
φ
q
q
q−1
0 → Sym (Syz(x, y, z)) → Sym
O Y (−1) −
O Y (−1) → 0
→ Sym
i =1

(5.6)

i =1

¡ ¢
¡ ¢
of ranks q + 1, q+2
, and q+1
respectively. From the formula µ(Symq F ) = qµ(F ) of
2
2
Proposition 5.1.10, we have that the slopes of the bundles of sequence (5.6) are − 29 q,
−3q and −3q + 3 respectively.

Remark 5.2.11. We have that
Ã

Sym

q

3
M
i =1

!

O Y (−1) ∼
=

M

O Y (−q).

(5.7)

i 1 ≤···≤i q
i j ∈{0,...,3}

Therefore the map φ of sequence (5.6) can be interpreted as a map between two splitting
vector bundles
M
M
φ:
O Y (−q) →
O Y (−q + 1)
i 1 ≤···≤i q

i 1 ≤···≤i q−1

and represented as a matrix with homogeneous entries in the coordinate ring R of Y .
Now, we assume that q is even, the case with q odd has been clarified in Corollary
5.2.5. We tensor sequence (5.6) with the line bundle O Y ( 32 q) of degree 92 q. This yields
µ ¶
µ
¶
³3 ´ M
1
1
φ M
0 → Symq (Syz(x, y, z)) ⊗ O Y q →
OY
q −
→
OY
q + 1 → 0.
(5.8)
2
2
2
³ ´
This gives a syzygy representation for the bundle E q := Symq (Syz(x, y, z)) ⊗ O Y 32 q ,
which has degree 0, by Proposition 5.1.10 and Proposition 5.2.2. Since E q is obtained

124

5.2. Symmetric signature of elliptic curves
from Symq (Syz(x, y, z)) via tensorization with a twisted structure sheaf, the splitting subbundles of E q and Symq (Syz(x, y, z)) are in bijective correspondence. In other words,
frkOY (1) E q = frkOY (1) Symq (Syz(x, y, z)). Moreover the bundle E q is semistable of slope 0,
so its only possible trivial subbundles are of degree 0, that is of the form O Y . This can
make the computation of the free rank of E q easier.
In addition, we observe that from sequence (5.8) we have that every O Y -summand of
E q gives rise to a section on the left, so we have an upper bound
frkOY (1) Symq (Syz(x, y, z)) ≤ h 0 (E q ).
The global sections h 0 (E q ) can be counted by looking at elements of degree 12 q in the
kernel of the map φ. If q is not too big, this could be done by hand or with the help of a
computer software.
Example 5.2.12. For q = 2, the sequence (5.8) looks like
0 → Sym2 (Syz(x, y, z)) ⊗ O Y (3) →

6
M

φ

O Y (1) −
→

i =1

3
M

O Y (2) → 0.

i =1

The map φ is given by the matrix

2x

Mφ = 0
0

y
x
0

z
0
x

0
2y
0

0
z
y


0
0
2z

with values in R. Its kernel is the bundle Sym2 (Syz(x, y, z)) ⊗ O Y (3). We have to look at
L
elements of degree 12 q = 1 in the kernel of φ, that is vectors h = (h 1 , . . . , h 6 ) ∈ 6i =1 O Y (1)
such that φ(h) = 0. In this case, it is clear that such an element h does not exist. Observe
that the defining equation of the curve f does not play a role here, since f has degree 3
and M φ · h has degree 2. Therefore, we have that frkOY (1) Sym2 (Syz(x, y, z)) = 0, in accordance with Example 5.2.9.
We conclude the chapter with some considerations on the case q = 4.
Example 5.2.13. For q = 4, the sequence (5.8) looks like
0 → Sym4 (Syz(x, y, z)) ⊗ O Y (6) →

15
M
i =1

φ

O Y (2) −
→

10
M

O Y (3) → 0,

i =1

and the map φ is given by the matrix

125

5. Symmetric signature of cones over elliptic curves



4x

y

z

0

···













Mφ = 













0
..
.

3x
..
.

0

2y

z

0

0

···
..
.

3x

0

y

2z

0

0

2x
..
.

0

0

3y

z

0

..

2x

0

0

2y

2z

0

0

0

2x
..
.

0

0

y

3z

0

..

x

0

0

0

4y

z

x
..

0

0

0

3y

2z

..

x
0

0
x

0
0

0
0

2y
0

3z
y

..
.
0
..
.
..
.
0

···

···

0

0

···

.
···

···

0

···

···

.

.

.


0
.. 
. 




.. 

. 


0

.. 
. 




.. 

. 


0
4z

with values in R. This time we have to look at homogeneous elements h of degree 2 in
the kernel of φ, so the equation f may play a role, since M φ · h is homogeneous of degree
3. For some specific equations f , it can be checked with Macaulay2 [GS] that we have
no such element h, so frkOY (1) Sym4 (Syz(x, y, z)) = 0, but to prove it in general something
more is needed.

126

A. Macaulay2 computations
A.0.3. Computation of Syz2R (k) for the singularity E 6
Macaulay2, version 1.6
with packages: ConwayPolynomials, Elimination, IntegralClosure, LLLBases,
PrimaryDecomposition, ReesAlgebra, TangentCone
i1 : R=QQ[x,y]/(x^7+x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1,y^2-2,x^4+1);
i2 : S=R[u,v];
i3 : p1=u*v*(u^4-v^4);
i4 : p2=u^8+14*u^4*v^4+v^8;
i5 : p3=u^12-33*u^8*v^4-33*u^4*v^8+v^12;
i6 : sub(p1,{u=>x^2*u, v=>x^6*v})===p1
o6 = true
i7 : sub(p2,{u=>x^2*u, v=>x^6*v})===p2
o7 = true
i8 : sub(p3,{u=>x^2*u, v=>x^6*v})===p3
o8 = true
i9 : sub(p1,{u=>x^2*v, v=>x^2*u})===p1
o9 = true
i10 : sub(p2,{u=>x^2*v, v=>x^2*u})===p2
o10 = true
i11 : sub(p3,{u=>x^2*v, v=>x^2*u})===p3
o11 = true
i12 : sub(p1,{u=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^3*v), v=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^7*v)})===p1
o12 = true
i13 : sub(p2,{u=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^3*v), v=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^7*v)})===p2
o13 = true
i14 : sub(p3,{u=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^3*v), v=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^7*v)})===p3
o14 = true
i15 : I=ideal(p1,p2,p3);
o15 : Ideal of S
i16 : syz(gens(I))
o16 = {6, 0} | -30u7-210u3v4 210u4v3+30v7 |
{8, 0} | 25u4v-5v5
-5u5+25uv4
|
{12, 0} | 5v
5u
|
i17 : s1=vector{210*u^4*v^3+30*v^7,-5*u^5+25*u*v^4,5*u};

127

A. Macaulay2 computations

i18
i19
o19
i20
o20
i21
o21
i22
o22
i23

:
:
=
:
=
:
=
:
=
:

s2=vector{-210*u^3*v^4-30*u^7,-5*v^5+25*u^4*v,5*v};
sub(s1,{u=>x^2*u, v=>x^6*v})===x^2*s1
true
sub(s2,{u=>x^2*u, v=>x^6*v})===x^6*s2
true
sub(s1,{u=>x^2*v, v=>x^2*u})===x^2*s2
true
sub(s2,{u=>x^2*v, v=>x^2*u})===x^2*s1
true
sub(s1,{u=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^3*v), v=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^7*v)})===
(y/2)*(x*s1+x^3*s2)
o23 = true
i24 : sub(s2,{u=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^3*v), v=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^7*v)})===
(y/2)*(x*s1+x^7*s2)
o24 = true

A.0.4. Computation of Syz2R (k) for the singularity E 7
Macaulay2, version 1.6
with packages: ConwayPolynomials, Elimination, IntegralClosure, LLLBases,
PrimaryDecomposition, ReesAlgebra, TangentCone
i1 : R=QQ[x,y]/(x^7+x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1,y^2-2,x^4+1);
i2 : S=R[u,v];
i3 : n=u*v*(u^4-v^4);
i4 : p1=u^8+14*u^4*v^4+v^8;
i5 : q=u^12-33*u^8*v^4-33*u^4*v^8+v^12;
i6 : p2=n^2;
i7 : p3=n*q;
i8 : sub(p1,{u=>x^3*u, v=>x^5*v})===p1
o8 = true
i9 : sub(p2,{u=>x^3*u, v=>x^5*v})===p2
o9 = true
i10 : sub(p3,{u=>x^3*u, v=>x^5*v})===p3
o10 = true
i11 : sub(p1,{u=>x^2*v, v=>x^2*u})===p1
o11 = true
i12 : sub(p2,{u=>x^2*v, v=>x^2*u})===p2
o12 = true
i13 : sub(p3,{u=>x^2*v, v=>x^2*u})===p3
o13 = true
i14 : sub(p1,{u=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^3*v), v=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^7*v)})===p1

128

o14
i15
o15
i16
o16
i17
o17
i18
o18

=
:
=
:
=
:
:
:
=

o18 :
i19 :
o19 =

o19 :
i20 :
o20 =

o20
i21
o21
i22
o22
i23
o23
i24
o24
i25
o25
i26
o26

:
:
=
:
=
:
=
:
=
:
=
:
=

true
sub(p2,{u=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^3*v), v=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^7*v)})===p2
true
sub(p3,{u=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^3*v), v=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^7*v)})===p3
true
I=ideal(p1,p2,p3);
Ideal of S
syz(gens(I))
{8, 0} | -35u9v2+42u5v6-7uv10 7u10v-42u6v5+35u2v9 |
{12, 0} | 42u7+294u3v4
-294u4v3-42v7
|
{18, 0} | -7v
-7u
|
3
2
Matrix S <--- S
s1=vector{7*u^10*v-42*u^6*v^5+35*u^2*v^9,-294*u^4*v^3-42*v^7,-7*u}
| 7u10v-42u6v5+35u2v9 |
| -294u4v3-42v7
|
| -7u
|
3
S
s2=vector{-35*u^9*v^2+42*u^5*v^6-7*u*v^10,42*u^7+294*u^3*v^4,-7*v}
| -35u9v2+42u5v6-7uv10 |
| 42u7+294u3v4
|
| -7v
|
3
S
sub(s1,{u=>x^3*u, v=>x^5*v})===x^3*s1
true
sub(s2,{u=>x^3*u, v=>x^5*v})===x^5*s2
true
sub(s1,{u=>x^2*v, v=>x^2*u})===x^2*s2
true
sub(s2,{u=>x^2*v, v=>x^2*u})===x^2*s1
true
sub(s1,{u=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^3*v), v=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^7*v)})===(y/2)*(x*s1+x^3*s2)
true
sub(s2,{u=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^3*v), v=>(y/2)*(x*u+x^7*v)})===(y/2)*(x*s1+x^7*s2)
true

A.0.5. Computation of Syz2R (k) for the singularity E 8
Macaulay2, version 1.6
with packages: ConwayPolynomials, Elimination, IntegralClosure, LLLBases,
PrimaryDecomposition, ReesAlgebra, TangentCone
i1 : R=QQ[x,y]/(1+x+x^2+x^3+x^4,y^2-5);
i2 : S=R[u,v];

129

A. Macaulay2 computations

i3
i4
i5
i6

p1=u^11*v+11*u^6*v^6-u*v^11;
p2=u^20-228*u^15*v^5+494*u^10*v^10+228*u^5*v^15+v^20;
p3=u^30+522*u^25*v^5-10005*u^20*v^10-10005*u^10*v^20-522*u^5*v^25+v^30;
sub(p1, {u=>(y/5)*((-x+x^4)*u+(x^2-x^3)*v),
v=>(y/5)*((x^2-x^3)*u+(x-x^4)*v)})===p1
o6 = true
i7 : sub(p2, {u=>(y/5)*((-x+x^4)*u+(x^2-x^3)*v),
v=>(y/5)*((x^2-x^3)*u+(x-x^4)*v)})===p2
o7 = true
i8 : sub(p3, {u=>(y/5)*((-x+x^4)*u+(x^2-x^3)*v),
v=>(y/5)*((x^2-x^3)*u+(x-x^4)*v)})===p3
o8 = true
i9 : sub(p1, {u=>(y/5)*((x^2-x^4)*u+(x^4-1)*v),
v=>(y/5)*((1-x)*u+(x^3-x)*v)})===p1
o9 = true
i10 : sub(p2, {u=>(y/5)*((x^2-x^4)*u+(x^4-1)*v),
v=>(y/5)*((1-x)*u+(x^3-x)*v)})===p2
o10 = true
i11 : sub(p3, {u=>(y/5)*((x^2-x^4)*u+(x^4-1)*v),
v=>(y/5)*((1-x)*u+(x^3-x)*v)})===p3
o11 = true
i12 : I=ideal(p1,p2,p3);
o12 : Ideal of S
i13 : syz(gens(I))
o13 = {12, 0} | -12012u19+2054052u14v5-2966964u9v10-684684u4v15
{20, 0} | 11011u10v+66066u5v6-1001v11
{30, 0} | 1001v
--------------------------------------------------------------------------684684u15v4+2966964u10v9+2054052u5v14+12012v19 |
-1001u11-66066u6v5+11011uv10
|
1001u
|
3
2
o13 : Matrix S <--- S
i14 : s1=vector{-684684*u^15*v^4+2966964*u^10*v^9+2054052*u^5*v^14+12012*v^19,
-1001*u^11-66066*u^6*v^5+11011*u*v^10,1001*u}
o14 = | -684684u15v4+2966964u10v9+2054052u5v14+12012v19 |
| -1001u11-66066u6v5+11011uv10
|
| 1001u
|
3
o14 : S
i15 : s2=vector{-12012*u^19+2054052*u^14*v^5-2966964*u^9*v^10-684684*u^4*v^15,
11011*u^10*v+66066*u^5*v^6-1001*v^11,1001*v}
o15 = | -12012u19+2054052u14v5-2966964u9v10-684684u4v15 |
| 11011u10v+66066u5v6-1001v11
|
| 1001v
|
3
o15 : S
i16 : sub(s1, {u=>(y/5)*((-x+x^4)*u+(x^2-x^3)*v),

130

:
:
:
:

v=>(y/5)*((x^2-x^3)*u+(x-x^4)*v)})===(y/5)*((-x+x^4)*s1+(x^2-x^3)*s2)
o16 = true
i17 : sub(s2, {u=>(y/5)*((-x+x^4)*u+(x^2-x^3)*v),
v=>(y/5)*((x^2-x^3)*u+(x-x^4)*v)})===(y/5)*((x^2-x^3)*s1+(x-x^4)*s2)
o17 = true
i18 : sub(s1, {u=>(y/5)*((x^2-x^4)*u+(x^4-1)*v),
v=>(y/5)*((1-x)*u+(x^3-x)*v)})===(y/5)*((x^2-x^4)*s1+(x^4-1)*s2)
o18 = true
i19 : sub(s2, {u=>(y/5)*((x^2-x^4)*u+(x^4-1)*v),
v=>(y/5)*((1-x)*u+(x^3-x)*v)})===(y/5)*((1-x)*s1+(x^3-x)*s2)
o19 = true

131

Bibliography
[AL03] I AN A BERBACH AND G RAHAM L EUSCHKE, The F-signature and strong F-regularity,
Math. Res. Lett., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2003.
[Ati56] M ICHAEL ATIYAH, On the Krull-Schmidt theorem with application to sheaves,
Bull. Soc. Math. France, vol. 84, pp. 307–317, 1956.
[Ati57] M ICHAEL ATIYAH, Vector bundles over an elliptic curve, Proc. London Math. Soc.
(3), vol. 7, pp. 414–452, 1957.
[AMD69] M ICHAEL ATIYAH AND I AN M AC D ONALD, Introduction to commutative algebra,
Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass.-London-Don Mills, Ont., 1969.
[Aus62] M AURICE AUSLANDER, On the purity of the branch locus, Amer. J. Math., vol. 84,
no. 1, pp. 116–125, 1962.
[Aus86a] M AURICE AUSLANDER, Isolated singularities and existence of almost split sequences, Representation theory, II (Ottawa, Ont., 1984), Lecture Notes in Math., vol.
1178, pp. 194–242, Springer, Berlin, 1986.
[Aus86b] M AURICE AUSLANDER, Rational singularities and almost split sequences, Trans.
Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 293, no. 2, pp. 511–531, 1986.
[AB59] M AURICE AUSLANDER AND D AVID B UCHSBAUM, On ramification theory in
Noetherian rings, Amer. J. Math., vol. 81, pp. 749–765, 1959.
[AG60] M AURICE AUSLANDER AND O SCAR G OLDMAN, The Brauer group of a commutative
ring, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 97, pp. 367–409, 1997.
[AR89] M AURICE AUSLANDER AND I DUN R EITEN, The Cohen-Macaulay type of CohenMacaulay rings, Adv. in Math., vol. 73, pp. 1–23, 1989.
[Bre12] H OLGER B RENNER, Invariantentheorie, Lecture held at the Universität Osnabrück in the winter semester 2012/13, avaiable at https://de.wikiversity.
org/wiki/Kurs:Invariantentheorie_(Osnabrück_2012-2013).
[Bre13] H OLGER B RENNER,
arXiv:1305.5873, 2013.

Irrational

Hilbert-Kunz

multiplicities,

preprint

[BH06] H OLGER B RENNER AND G EORG H EIN, Restriction of the cotangent bundle to elliptic curves and Hilbert-Kunz functions, Manuscripta Math., vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 17–36,
2006.
[BS98] M ARKUS B RODMANN AND R ODNEY S HARP, Local cohomology. An algebraic introduction with geometric applications, Cambridge studies in Advanced Mathematics,

133

Bibliography
vol. 60, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[BD08] I GOR B URBAN AND Y URIY D ROZD, Maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules over surface singularities, Trends in representation theory of algebras and related topics, pp.
101–166, EMS Ser. Congr. Rep., Eur. Math. Soc., Zürich, 2008.
[BH98] W INFRIED B RUNS AND J ÜRGEN H ERZOG, Cohen-Macaulay rings. Revised edition,
Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 39, Cambridge University Press,
1998.
[Car57] H ENRI C ARTAN, Quotient d’un espace analytique par un groupe
d’automorphismes, A Symposium in Honor of S. Lefschetz, Algebraic Geometry and Topology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., pp. 90–102, 1957.
[CHR65] S TEPHEN C HASE , D AVID K ENT H ARRISON , AND A LEX R OSENBERG, Galois theory
and Galois cohomology of commutative rings, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., no. 52, pp.
15–33, 1965.
[DK02] H ARM D ERKSEN AND G REGOR K EMPER, Computational Invariant Theory, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 130, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002.
[Eis94] D AVID E ISENBUD, Commutative algebra with a view toward algebraic geometry,
Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 150, Springer, 1994.
[EGHLSVY11] PAVEL E TINGOF, O LEG G OLBERG , S EBASTIAN H ENSEL , T IANKAI L IU , A LEX
S CHWENDNER , D MITRY VAINTROB AND E LENA Y UDOVINA, Introduction to representation theory, Student Mathematical Library, vol. 59, American Mathematical Society, 2011.
[Fei82] WALTER F EIT, The representation theory of finite groups, North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol. 25, 1982.
[Fog81] J OHN F OGARTY, On the depth of local rings of invariants of cyclic groups, Proc.
Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 448–452, 1981.
[FH91] W ILLIAM F ULTON AND J OE H ARRIS, Representation theory. A first course, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 129, Springer, 1991.
[GAP15] T HE GAP G ROUP, GAP - Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.7.8,
2015.
[GSV81] G ERARDO G ONZÁLEZ -S PRINBERG AND J EAN -L UIS V ERDIER, Points doubles rationnels et représentations de groupes, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math, vol. 293, no.
2, pp. 111–113, 1981.
[GS] D ANIEL G RAYSON AND M ICHAEL S TILLMAN, Macaulay 2. A software system
for research in algebraic geometry, avaiable at http://www.math.uiuc.edu/
Macaulay2/.
[Har77] R OBIN H ARTSHORNE, Algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol.
52, Springer, 1977.

134

Bibliography
[HN15] M ITSUYASU H ASHIMOTO AND Y USUKE N AKAJIMA, Generalized F-signature of invariant subrings, J. Algebra, vol. 443, pp. 142–152, 2015.
[Her78a] J ÜRGEN H ERZOG, Ein Cohen-Macaulay-Kriterium mit Anwendungen auf
Konormalenmodul und den Differentialmodul, Math. Z., vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 149–
162, 1978.
[Her78b] J ÜRGEN H ERZOG, Ringe mit nur endlich vielen Isomorphieklassen von maximalen, unzerlegbaren Cohen-Macaulay-Moduln, Math. Ann., vol. 233, pp. 21–34,
1978.
[Hun96] C RAIG H UNEKE, Tight closure and its applications. With an appendix by Melvin
Hochster, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 88, 1996.
[Hun13] C RAIG H UNEKE, Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity and the F-signature, Commutative
algebra. Expository papers dedicated to David Eisenbud on the occasion of his 65th
birthday, pp. 485–525, Springer, 2013.
[HL02] C RAIG H UNEKE AND G RAHAM L EUSCHKE, Two theorems about maximal CohenMacaulay modules, Math. Ann., vol. 324, no. 2, pp. 391–404, 2002.
[IT13] O SAMU I YAMA AND RYO TAKAHASHI, Tilting and cluster tilting for quotient singularities, Math. Ann., vol. 365, pp. 1065–1105, 2013.
[ILLMMSW07] S RIKANTH I YENGAR , G RAHAM L EUSCHKE , A NTON L EYKIN , C LAUDIA
M ILLER , E ZRA M ILLER , A NURAG S INGH , AND U LI WALTHER, Twenty-four hours of
local cohomology, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 87, American Mathematical Society, 2007.
[Kra14] H ENNING K RAUSE, Krull-Schmidt categories and projective covers, preprint avaiable at https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/~hkrause/krs.pdf, 2014.
[Kru25] W OLFGANG K RULL, Über verallgemeinerte endliche Abelsche Gruppen, Math. Z.,
vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 161–196, 1925.
[Kun69] E RNST K UNZ, Characterizations of regular local rings for characteristic p, Amer.
J. Math., vol. 91, pp. 772–784, 1969.
[Lam98] T SIT-Y UEN L AM, Lectures on modules and rings, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 189, Springer, 1998.
[LeP97] J OSEPH L E P OTIER, Lectures on vector bundles, Cambridge Studies in Advanced
Mathematics, vol. 54, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
[LW12] G RAHAM L EUSCHKE AND R OGER W IEGAND, Cohen-Macaulay representations,
Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 181, American Mathematical Society,
2012.
[LS99] G ENNADY LYUBEZNIK AND K AREN S MITH, Strong and weak F-regularity are equivalent for graded rings, Amer. J. Math., vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 1279–1290, 1999.
[Mac71] S AUNDERS M AC L ANE, Category theory for the working mathematician, Gradu-

135

Bibliography
ate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 5, Springer, 1971.
[Mar87] A LEX M ARTSINKOVSKY, Almost split sequences and Zariski differentials, Thesis,
Brandeis Univ., 1987.
[Mar90] A LEX M ARTSINKOVSKY, Almost split sequences and Zariski differentials, Trans.
Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 319, pp. 285–307, 1990.
[Mar92] A LEX M ARTSINKOVSKY, On two-dimensional quasihomogeneous isolated singularities, I, Arch. Math., vol. 59, pp. 550–555, 1992.
[MS05] E ZRA M ILLER AND B ERND S TURMFELS, Combinatorial commutative algebra,
Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 227, Springer, 2005.
[Mon83] PAUL M ONSKY, The Hilbert-Kunz function, Math. Ann., vol. 263, pp. 43–49,
1983.
[Mon08] PAUL M ONSKY, Rationality of Hilbert-Kunz multiplicities: a likely counterexample, Special volume in honor of Melvin Hochster, Michigan Math. J., vol. 57, pp.
605–613, 2008.
[Muk03] S HIGERU M UKAI, An introduction to invariants and moduli, Cambridge Studies
in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 81, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[Nag65] M ASAYOSHI N AGATA, Lecture on the fourteenth problem of Hilbert, Tata Institute
of Fundamental Research, Bombay, 1965.
[Pri67] D AVID P RILL, Local classification of quotients of complex manifolds by discontinuous groups, Duke Math. J., vol. 34, pp. 375–386, 1967.
[Rem11] R OBERT R EMAK, Über die Zerlegung der endlichen Gruppen in direkte unzerlegbare Faktoren, J. reine angew. Math., vol. 139, pp. 293–308, 1911.
[Rot09] J OSEPH R OTMAN, An introduction to homological algebra. Second edition, Universitext, Springer, 2009.
[Sak78] F UMIO S AKAI, Symmetric powers and the cotangent bundle and classification of
algebraic varieties, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 732, pp. 545–563, 1978.
[SS88] G ÜNTER S CHEJA
Stuttgart, 1988.

AND

U WE S TORCH, Lehrbuch der Algebra. Teil 2, B.G. Teubner,

[Sch13] OTTO S CHMIDT, Sur les produits directs, Bull. soc. Math. France, vol. 41, pp. 161–
164, 1913.
[ST12] K ARL S CHWEDE AND K EVIN T UCKER, A survey of test ideals, Progress in commutative algebra, vol. 2, pp. 39–99, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2012.
[Sei97] G ERHARD S EIBERT, The Hilbert-Kunz function of rings of finite Cohen-Macaulay
type, Arch. Math. (Basel), vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 286–296, 1997.
[Ser77] J EAN -P IERRE S ERRE, Linear representations of finite groups, Graduate Texts in
Mathematics, vol. 42, Springer, 1977.

136

Bibliography
[Ser00] J EAN -P IERRE S ERRE, Local Algebra, Springer Monographs in Mathematics,
Springer-Verlag, 2000.
[Sil86] J OSEPH S ILVERMAN, The arithmetic of elliptic curves, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 106, Springer, 1986.
[Sin05] A NURAG S INGH, The F-signature of an affine semigroup ring, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, vol. 196, no. 2–3, pp. 313–321, 2005.
[SVB96] K AREN S MITH AND M ICHEL VAN D EN B ERGH, Simplicity of rings of differential
operators in prime characteristic, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 32–
62, 1997.
[Spr87] T ONNY A LBERT S PRINGER, Poincaré Series of Binary Polyhedral Groups and
McKay’s Correspondence, Math. Ann., vol. 278, pp. 99–116, 1987.
[Tak08] RYO TAKAHASHI, Direct summands of syzygy modules of the residue class field,
Nagoya Math. J., vol. 189, pp. 1–25, 2008.
[Tei] M ONTSERRAT T EIXIDOR I B IGAS, Vector bundles on curves, on-line notes avaiable at
http://www.tufts.edu/~mteixido/files/vectbund.pdf.
[Tuc12] K EVIN T UCKER, F-signature exists, Invent. Math., vol. 190, no. 3, pp. 743–765,
2012.
[VKo11] M ICHAEL V ON KORFF, The F-signature of toric varieties., Thesis, Univ. of Michigan, 2012.
[Wat74a] K EI - ICHI WATANABE, Certain invariant subrings are Gorenstein. I, Osaka J.
Math, vol. 11, pp. 1–8, 1974.
[Wat74b] K EI - ICHI WATANABE, Certain invariant subrings are Gorenstein. II, Osaka J.
Math vol. 11, pp. 379–388, 1974.
[WY00] K EI - ICHI WATANABE AND K EN - ICHI Y OSHIDA, Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity and an
inequality between multiplicity and colength, J. Algebra, vol. 230, no. 1, pp. 295–317,
2000.
[WY04] K EI - ICHI WATANABE AND K EN - ICHI Y OSHIDA, Minimal relative Hilbert-Kunz
multiplicity, Illinois J. Math., vol. 48, pp. 273–294, 2004.
[Web14] P ETER W EBB, Finite group representations for the pure mathematician,
notes avaiable at http://www.math.umn.edu/~webb/RepBook/RepnControl.
pdf, 2014.
[Wed09] J OSEPH W EDDERBURN, On the direct product in the theory of finite groups, Ann.
Math., vol. 10, pp. 173–176, 1909.
[Yao05] Y ONGWEI YAO, Modules with finite F-representation type, J. London Math. Soc.
(2), vol. 72, pp. 53–72, 2005.
[Yao06] Y ONGWEI YAO, Observations on the F-signature of local rings of characteristic p,
J. Algebra, vol. 299, no. 1, pp. 198–218, 2006.

137

Bibliography
[Yos90] Y UJI Y OSHINO, Cohen-Macaulay modules over Cohen-Macaulay rings, London
Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 146, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1990.
[YK88] Y UJI Y OSHINO AND TAKUJI K AWAMOTO, The fundamental module of a normal
local domain of dimension 2, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 309, no. 1, pp. 425–431,
1988.

138

