arXiv:1711.09396v1 [] 26 Nov 2017

Totally non cohomologous to zero fibrations
and amenable Clifford-Klein forms of
3-symmetric spaces
Maciej Bocheński and Aleksy Tralle
November 28, 2017
Abstract
We prove that 3-symmetric spaces of simple linear real Lie groups
do not admit amenable compact Clifford-Klein forms. Our basic tool
are totally non cohomologous to zero fibrations.

1

Introduction

Let G/H be a non-compact homogeneous space of reductive type. We
say that G/H admits a compact Cliﬀord-Klein form if there exists a discrete subgroup Γ ⊂ G such that Γ acts properly on G/H by left translations and the quotient Γ \ G/H is compact. The problem of ﬁnding compact Cliﬀord-Klein forms is a diﬃcult and deep problem, which appeared
as a relativistic space form problem in [CM], and was formulated as a research program in [Kob]. Many approaches and partial results were obtained [MA],[OH],[OW],[SH],[Th]. However, it is still open even for pseudoRiemannian symmetric spaces [KY]. Also, it is important to understand
when homogeneous spaces with other invariant geometric structures admit
compact Cliﬀord-Klein forms. For example, it was shown in [KY] that paraHermitian homogeneous spaces do not admit them. In this respect, our
questions are inspired by this result. In the same vein, Benoist and Labourie
[BL] derived a necessary condition for the existence of compact Cliﬀord-Klein
forms of symplectic homogeneous spaces. At this point we want to stress that
there is yet another important family of homogeneous spaces which appear
1

in diﬀerential geometry, the class of 3-symmetric spaces determined by automorphisms of G of order 3 [Kow, WG] (see subsection 2.3 for some details).
The latter has many interesting geometric properties, for example, all such
spaces carry a canonical almost complex structure. Thus, it is natural to ask
about the possible compact Cliﬀord-Klein forms of this class, again, considering it as a “relativistic space form problem”. It is important to observe,
that the possible algebraic structure of Γ ⊂ G yielding compact CliﬀordKlein forms, is not understood. The only complete result in this direction
is a theorem of Benoist [BEN] which says that no nilpotent Γ can act properly and co-compactly on semisimple G/H. Following this line of thinking
we want to understand what algebraic properties do have subgroups Γ which
yield compact Clifford-Klein forms? In [BT1] we showed that homogeneous
spaces G/H of parabolic type do not admit solvable Cliﬀord-Klein forms.
In [BT] we analyzed the case of pseudo-Riemannian symmetric spaces and
obtained some partial results. The aim of this article is to prove that in the
case of 3-symmetric homogeneous spaces of non-compact type, the problem
can be fully solved. The main result of this work is formulated as follows.
Theorem 1. 3-Symmetric homogeneous spaces G/H determined by noncompact simple real linear Lie groups G and a non-compact subgroup H do
not admit amenable compact Clifford-Klein forms.
Remark 1. Note that our question on the algebraic structure of Γ makes
sense only for non-compact H, because for compact H solvable (and, hence,
amenable) compact Cliﬀord-Klein forms do not exist for obvious reasons.
Finally, we want to stress that our main tool in this work are topological
obstructions to compact Cliﬀord-Klein forms found by Kobayashi and Ono
[KO] and further developments by Morita [M].

2
2.1

Preliminaries
Notation

In this work we consider only cohomology over the reals. Therefore, we omit
the notation for the ﬁeld of coeﬃcients and write H ∗ (X) for the cohomology algebra of any topological space X (in fact, we consider manifolds and
the de Rham cohomology). As usual, H∗ (X) is used for the homology of
X. Throughout this paper we use the basics of Lie theory without further
2

explanations. One can consult [K]. We denote Lie groups by G, H, ..., and
their Lie algebras by the corresponding Gothic letters g, h.... The symbol gC
denotes the complexiﬁcation of a real Lie algebra g. Also, given a real Lie
algebra g we consider the Lie algebra cohomology H ∗ (g). For any subalgebra
a ⊂ g we denote by H ∗ (g, a) the relative Lie algebra cohomology.
Recall that solvmanifolds are the homogeneous spaces of connected solvable Lie groups.
We say that a discrete group Γ is amenable if it admits a ﬁnitely additive
probability measure.

2.2

Clifford-Klein forms and Kobayashi’s criterion

Let X be a Hausdorﬀ topological space and Γ a topological group acting on
X. We say that an action of Γ on X is proper if for any compact subset
S ⊂ X the set
{γ ∈ Γ | γ(S) ∩ S 6= ∅}

is compact. In particular, this article is devoted to the proper actions of a
discrete subgroup Γ ⊂ G on G/H by left translations.
Recall that we say that G/H admits a compact Clifford-Klein form if
there exists a discrete subgroup Γ ⊂ G acting properly and co-compactly on
G/H. We say that a compact Cliﬀord-Klein form is solvable (respectively,
amenable), if Γ is solvable (amenable). We consider homogeneous spaces
G/H of reductive type, which means, by deﬁnition, that G is semisimple linear
Lie group and there exists a Cartan involution θ on g such that θ(h) ⊂ h and
that the connected Lie subgroup corresponding to hC is closed in Int(gC ).
Typical examples of spaces of reductive type are semisimple symmetric and
3-symmetric spaces. Using the Cartan involution, one can obtain for spaces
of reductive type the compatible Cartan decomposition
h = kH + pH , kH = k ∩ h, pH = p ∩ h,
on the Lie algebra level and one can choose a maximal abelian subalgebra in
pH so that aH ⊂ a.
For any connected Lie group U put d(U) := dim(U) − dim(KU ), where
KU denotes a maximal compact subgroup of U. If G/H is of reductive type,
one can write d(G) = dim p (then, clearly, d(H) = dim pH ). We will need
the following result.

3

Theorem 2 ([Kob],[OW]). If a closed connected subgroup U acts properly
and co-compactly on G/H then
d(G) = d(H) + d(U)
Recall that a homogeneous space G/H is reductive, if g admits a direct
Ad(H)-invariant decomposition
g=h+m

(1)

(thus a space of reductive type is reductive). For example, if σ ∈ Aut(g)
is an automorphism of g of ﬁnite order, then there is a canonical reductive
decomposition (1) with h = gσ and m = Aσ g, where Aσ = σ − I. Here
and throughout this paper I means the identity map. For any homogeneous
space G/H we denote by Ω∗ (G/H)G the (diﬀerential) graded algebra of all
G-invariant diﬀerential forms on G/H. It is well known [GHV],[KO] that for
the reductive homogeneous space G/H there is a natural isomorphism
Ω∗ (G/H)G ∼
= (Λm∗ )H .
In the latter formula, H acts on Λm∗ by the coadjoint representation, and
(Λm∗ )H denotes the subalgebra of the ﬁxed points of H. The (de Rham)
cohomology algebra over the reals of a compact homogeneous space G/H is
given by the formula
H ∗ (G/H) = H ∗ (Ω∗ (G/H)G ).

2.3

3-Symmetric spaces

The importance of symmetric spaces in geometry and analysis is well known.
These are homogeneous spaces G/H, where H is an open subgroup of the
subgroup Gσ of all ﬁxed points of an involutive automorphism σ ∈ Aut(G).
In this article we consider 3-symmetric spaces, which are deﬁned by a similar
condition
Gσ0 ⊂ H ⊂ Gσ

as for symmetric spaces, but with the requirement that σ is an automorphism of G of order 3. These spaces were classiﬁed by Wolf and Gray [WG].
The geometric applications of this class are concerned with G-invariant almost complex structures and almost Hermitian geometry. The homogeneous
4

spaces G/H of reductive type generated by automorphisms of order 3 carry
natural almost complex structures, because Wolf and Gray proved the following.
Theorem 3. Let G/H be a (reductive) homogeneous 3-symmetric space.
Consider the reductive decomposition
g = h + m, m = Aσ g.
Then the canonical G-invariant almost complex structure on G/H is determined by the formula
√
1
3
P : m → m, P = − I +
J,
2
2
where P denotes the induced action σ|m .
Thus one can consider G-invariant almost Hermitian metrics on G/H
and investigate important properties of being Hermitian, semi-Kaehler, almost Kaehler and nearly Kaehler. All these classes are of importance to
geometry and are used in physical applications. Let us just mention the relations of 3-symmetric spaces to twistor theory [Bu], Ricci solitons [CR] and
symplectic geometry [BT2]. It seems that the relation of an important class
of homogeneous nearly Kaehler manifolds to 3-symmetric spaces deserves a
special attention [C].

2.4

Kobayashi and Ono theorem

Let G/H be a homogeneous space of reductive type. Let Gu be a compact
real form of a (connected) complexiﬁcation GC of G and let Hu be a compact
real form of H C ⊂ GC . The space Gu /Hu is called the homogeneous space of
compact type associated with G/H (or dual to G/H). Groups Gu , Hu are
called the compact duals of G and H, respectively.
Theorem 4 ([KO], Theorem 4). Assume that a discrete subgroup Γ ⊂ G
acts on G/H freely and properly. Then there is a natural map
η : H ∗ (Gu /Hu ) → H ∗ (Γ \ G/H)
which sends the Pontryagin classes of Gu /Hu to those of Γ\G/H. If Γ\G/H
is compact then η is injective. Also, it sends the Euler class of Gu /Hu to the
Euler class of Γ \ G/H.
5

2.5

Syndetic hull

We will need the notion of a syndetic hull [W].
Definition 1. A syndetic hull of a subgroup Γ of a Lie group G is a subgroup
B of G such that B is connected, B contains Γ and Γ \ B is compact.
Lemma 1 ([BT1]). If a solvable subgroup Γ ⊂ G acts properly and cocompactly on G/H, then
1. there exists a syndetic hull of Γ,
2. there exists a solvable subgroup Γ0 ⊂ AN that acts properly and cocompactly on G/H, with a syndetic hull B ⊂ AN.

3

TNCZ-fibrations and cohomology of homogeneous spaces

In this section we discuss our basic topological tool [GHV], [FHT],[FOT].
One can ﬁnd all the necessary information about the role of the totally non
cohomologous to zero ﬁbrations, diﬀerential graded algebras, and so on, in
these sources. We use this material without further explanations.

3.1

Totally non cohomologous to zero fibrations

Let
i

π

F −−−→ E −−−→ B
be a Serre ﬁbration. We say that it is totally non-cohomologous to zero
(TNCZ for short) if one of the following equivalent conditions is satisﬁed:
• i∗ : H ∗ (E) → H ∗ (F ) is onto,
• π ∗ : H ∗ (B) → H ∗ (E) in injective,
It appears that the TNCZ condition yields and obstruction to compact
Cliﬀord-Klein forms. This was discovered by Morita [M]. We recall his
result in a slightly diﬀerent form.

6

Theorem 5. Assume that a homogeneous space G/H of reductive type admits a compact Clifford-Klein form. Then the fiber bundle
HU /KH → Gu /KH → Gu /Hu
must be a TNCZ-fibration.
Proof. Recall the isomorphisms from [KO]:
Ω∗ (G/H)G ∼
= (Λq∗ )H
Ω∗ (Gu /Hu )Gu ∼
= (Λq∗u )Hu
One can see from the proof of these isomorphisms, that the same holds for
the decompositions
√
g = kh + q̃, gu = kh + q̃ ∩ k + −1q̃ ∩ p
and, moreover, the inclusions hold:

kh ⊂ k, q ⊂ q̃, qu ⊂ q̃u .

It follows that the following diagram is commutative
∼
=

(Λq̃∗)KH ) −−−→ (Λq̃∗u )KH
x
x


incl
incl
(Λq∗)H

−−−→ (Λq∗u )Hu

As a result we get the commutative diagram
ϕ̂

incl

ϕ

incl

Ω∗ (Gu /KH )Gu −−−→ Ω∗ (G/KH )G −−−→ Ω∗ (Γ \ G/H)
x
x


π2 
π1 
Ω∗ (Gu /Hu )Gu −−−→ Ω∗ (G/H)G −−−→ Ω∗ (Γ \ G/H)

Here π1 and π2 denote the pullbacks. The latter yields the commutative
diagram
γ̂
H ∗ (Gu /KH ) −−−→ H ∗ (Γ \ G/KH )
x
x




γ

H ∗ (Gu /Hu ) −−−→ H ∗ (Γ \ G/H)
Now, assuming that Γ\G/H is compact we conclude that γ is injective [KO].
But since H ∗ (Γ\G/H) ∼
= H ∗ (Γ\G/KH ), we see from the commutativity that
the left vertical arrow must be injective as well. The proof is complete.
7

3.2

Cohomology of compact homogeneous spaces

In this section we recall the classical results on real cohomology of compact homogeneous spaces in the suitable for us form [T]. Let G be a compact connected Lie group. The cohomology algebra H ∗ (G) is an exterior
algebra over vector space generated by primitive elements y1 , ..., yn of odd
degrees 2k1 − 1, ..., 2kn − 1, where n = rank G. These generators can be
chosen in a way, that the cohomology algebra of the classifying space BG
is isomorphic to the polynomial algebra R[x1 , ..., xn ], where elements yj are
cohomology classes in the universal space EG containing coboundaries of
the transgression for xj . Let H ⊂ G be a closed subgroup. Choose maximal tori TH ⊂ T of H and G, and their Lie algebras tH ⊂ t. It is well
known that the cohomology algebras H ∗ (BG) and H ∗ (BH) are isomorphic
to the polynomial algebras of the invariants of the Weyl groups W (G) and
W (H) respectively. It is a classical result that the canonical homomorphism
ρ∗ (H, G) : H ∗ (BG) → H ∗ (BH) induced by the inclusion H ֒→ G sends any
invariant polynomial from H ∗ (BG) its restriction on H ∗ (BH). Introduce the
following notation:
H ∗ (BG) ∼
= R[t]W (G) = R[f1 , ..., fn ],
H ∗ (BH) ∼
= R[tH ]W (H) = R[u1 , ..., ur ],
where fj are W (G)-invariant polynomials over t, and uk are W (H)-invariant
polynomials over tH . The cohomology algebra of G/H can be calculated with
the use of the following.
Theorem 6 ([T], Theorem 8). Assume that f1 , ..., fn are generators of the
ring R[t]W (G) , and assume that r = rank H. Let j ∗ : R[t]W (G) → R[tH ]W (H)
denote the restriction map j ∗ (f ) = f |tH (which corresponds to ρ∗ (G, H)
under the suitable isomorphisms). If j ∗ (fr+1 ), ..., j ∗ (fn ) belong to the ideal
(j ∗ (f1 ), ..., j ∗ (fr )) generated by polynomials j ∗ (f1 ), ..., j ∗ (fr ), then
H ∗ (G/H) = (R[tH ]W (H) /(j ∗ (f1 ), ..., j ∗ (fr )) ⊗ Λ(xr+1 , ..., xn ).
As usual, the diﬀerential graded algebra
(CG/H , d) = (H ∗ (BH) ⊗ Λ(y1, ..., yn ), d)
d|H ∗ (BH) = 0, dyj = j ∗ (fj ), j = 1, ..., n
is called the Cartan algebra of G/H. Note that H ∗ (G/H) ∼
= H ∗ (CG/H ) for
any homogeneous space G/H of compact Lie group G.
8

4

Proof of the main theorem

The proof of the main theorem follows from the statements below.
Proposition 1. Assume that d = dim Hu /KH . If the coefficient in degree d
of the Poincaré polynomial P (Gu /KH , t) vanishes, then G/H does not admit
compact Clifford-Klein forms.
Proof. Recall that if G/H admitted a compact Cliﬀord-Klein form, one would
have i∗ [Hu /KH ] 6= 0, by Theorem 5 and since d = dim(Hu /KH ). On the
other hand, one can see that i = p ◦ j, where j and p are determined by the
sequence
j
p
Hu /KH −−−→ Gu /KH −−−→ Gu /K
By assumption on the Poincaré polynomial of Gu /KH , Hd (Gu /KH ) = 0.
Hence, i∗ [Hu /KH ] = p∗ (j∗ [Hu /KH ]) = 0, because j∗ [Hu /KH ] ∈ Hd (Gu /KH ) =
0.
Proposition 2. Let G/H be a non-compact homogeneous space of reductive
type. Assume that rank G = rank H. Then no solvable Γ can yield a compact
Clifford-Klein form of G/H.
Proof. Without loss of generality we assume that Γ acts properly and freely
on G/H. Note that G/KH and G/H have the same homotopy type, and the
same holds for Γ \ G/KH and Γ \ G/H. Let χ(Γ) = χ(BΓ) = χ(Γ \ G/K).
Looking at the ﬁbration
K/KH → Γ \ G/KH → Γ \ G/K
one obtains
χ(Γ \ G/H) = χ(Γ \ G/KH ) = χ(K/KH ) · χ(Γ).
By assumption of the Proposition, rank G = rank H which implies rank Gu =
rank Hu and, therefore, χ(Gu /Hu ) 6= 0. Thus, the Euler class of T (Gu /Hu )
does not vanish, and by Theorem 4, e(T (Γ \ G/H) 6= 0, which implies that
the Euler characteristic of Γ\G/H does not vanish. On the other hand, since
Γ admits a syndetic hull B by Lemma 1, one obtains a compact solvmanifold
Γ \ B. Since Γ contains a subgroup of ﬁnite index which can be embedded into a simply-connected solvable Lie group B̃ as a lattice (see [VGS],
Theorem 3.14), one obtains χ(Γ) = χ(Γ \ B̃). It is known that the Euler
characteristic of a compact solvmanifold vanishes [HIL]. We have arrived at
a contradiction.
9

Note again that everywhere B denotes the syndetic hull of Γ which exists
by Lemma 1. Consider the relative Lie algebra cohomology H ∗ (g, a, R) (for
any subalgebra a ⊂ g).
Denote by ΓH a co-compact lattice in H. It is straightforward that MB =
ΓH \ G/B is a compact manifold of dimension, say, n. Since B is a syndetic
hull of Γ, it is unimodular, which implies (Λn (g/b∗ )B 6= 0. It follows that
there exists an invariant n-form Φ on G/B which yields a volume form on
MB . It follows that H n (g, b, R) 6= 0. Let A ⊂ B be a closed connected
subgroup and a ⊂ b the corresponding Lie subalgebra. Denote by η the
natural map in the relative Lie algebra cohomology H ∗ (g, b) → H ∗ (g, a).
Proposition 3. If G/H admits a solvable compact Clifford-Klein form, then
the map
η
0 6= H n (g, b) −−−→ H n (g, a)
is injective.

Proof. Consider the commutative diagram
η

H n (g, b) −−−→


fy

H n (g, a)


gy

π∗

H n (MB ) −−−→ H n (ΓH \ G/A)
where π : ΓH \ G/A → ΓH \ G/B denotes the natural projection. Note that
π has contractible ﬁber, and f is injective, which implies the injectivity of
η.
Proposition 4. The 3-symmetric spaces
SO(4, 4)/SU(1, 2), SO(4, 4)/G2(2)
do not admit solvable compact Clifford-Klein forms.
Proof. By Proposition 3 the map
H n (a, b) → H n (g)
is injective in degree n = 16 for SO(4, 4)/SU(1, 2) and in degree n = 20 for
the case SO(4, 4)/G2(2). The latter follows from Theorem 2. Indeed, one
can see that dim p = 16 for g = so(4, 4) and dim pH = 8 for h = g2(2) . Since
10

Γ\G/H is compact, Theorem 2 implies dim b = 8. Hence dim(SO(4, 4)/B) =
20. By Lemma 3.7 and Proposition 3.9 in [KO] H ∗ (g) is isomorphic to
H ∗ (gu ). Here gu = so(8), which yields dim gu = 28, and the following
degrees of the primitive elements in the Lie algebra cohomology: 3, 7, 11, 7.
This necessarily implies H 16 (g) = 0 and H 20 (g) = 0, a contradiction.
Proposition 5. The 3-symmetric space SO(3, 5)/G2(2) does not admit compact Clifford-Klein forms.
Proof. We will show that i∗ [Hu /KH ] is zero in H∗ (Gu /K). Then the proof
will follow from Theorem 5. In our case
Gu = SO(8), K = SO(3)×SO(5), Hu = G2 , KH = Hu ∩K = SO(3)×SO(3).
Note that d = dim(G2 /SO(3) × SO(3)) = 8. Hence the fundamental homology class [Hu /KH ] = [G2 /(SO(3) × SO(3))] ∈ H8 (Hu /KH ). To show the
required equality, we plainly calculate the cohomology algebra of Gu /KH ,
calculating the corresponding Cartan algebra. First, we need to calculate
the Cartan subalgebra of tH and the embedding tH ⊂ t. Here we can use the
calculation from [T] on pages 150-151 with the following modiﬁcation. Note
that rank Hu = rank KH . It follows that one can choose the same Cartan
subalgebra tH for kH and hu . The following was shown in [T]. Let gu be a
simple compact Lie algebra of type D4 . Then, any Cartan subalgebra of a
subalgebra hu ⊂ gu generated by an outer automorphism can be described
by the formula
t′H = {(x1 , ..., x4 ) | x1 = 0, x2 + x3 = x4 }.
Note that Theorem 5.5 in [WG] implies that hu is determined by an outer
automorphism of gu , therefore, we can use the above formula. This justiﬁes
the calculation below. We get
Q[t]W (SO(8)) = Q[f1 , ..., f4 ]
where
f1 = x21 + x22 + x23 + x24 , f2 = x21 x22 + x21 x23 + x21 x24 + x22 x23 + x22 x24 + x23 x24
f3 = x21 x22 x23 + x21 x22 x24 + x21 x23 x24 + x22 x23 x24 , f4 = x1 x2 x3 x4 .
In the same way
Q[tH ]W (SO(3)×SO(3)) = Q[x22 , x23 ].
11

Finally, this yields
H ∗ (SO(8)/SO(3) × SO(3)) = Q[x22 , x23 ]/(g4 , g8 ) ⊗ Λ(y7 , y11 ),

(∗)

where
f1 |t′H = g4 = x22 + x23 + (x2 + x3 )2 ,

f2 |t′H = g8 = x22 x23 + (x22 + x23 )(x2 + x3 )2
f3 |t′H = g12 = x22 x23 (x2 + x3 )2 ,
f4 |t′H = g̃8 = 0.

Note that (∗) follows from the observation that g12 ∈ (g4 , g8 ). Observe the
following. Since g4 = x22 + x23 + (x2 + x3 )2 , it follows that
x22 + x23 + x22 + 2x2 x3 + x23 = 0 in H ∗ (Gu /KH )
which yields x22 +x23 = −x2 x3 in the cohomology. Looking at the expression of
g8 , one can see that x22 x23 = 0 in H ∗ (Gu /KH ). It follows that H 8 (Gu /KH ) =
0, and the proof follows from Proposition 1.
Completion of proof of the main theorem It follows from the Tits
alternative that if G/H admits a compact amenable Cliﬀord-Klein it also
admits a solvable Cliﬀord-Klein form. Thus, it is suﬃcient to eliminate
the possibility of getting the latter. By Proposition 2 we should consider
only 3-symmetric spaces with simple Lie groups of non-compact type and
with rank G > rank H. The latter are contained in Table 7.14 of [WG].
Examining this Table we get the following list:
SO(4, 4)/SU(1, 2), SO(4, 4)/G2(2), SO(3, 5)/G2(2), Spin(1, 7)/G2.
The ﬁrst three cases are eliminated by Proposition 4 and Proposition 5. The
case of Spin(1, 7)/G2 should not be considered, because G2 is compact. 
Remark 2. In Table 7.14 in [WG] the authors use a bit diﬀerent notation:
SO m(n) from this Table corresponds to our SO(m, n − m), and G∗2 to G2(2)
(see also page 118 in [WG]). For obvious reasons, we exclude non-simple G
and complex Lie groups.

12

References
[BEN]

Y. Benoist, Actions propres sur les espaces homogènes réductifs,
Ann. of Math. 144 (1996), 315-347.

[BL]

Y. Benoist, F. Labourie Sur les espaces homogènes modèles de
variétés compactes, Publications Mathématiques de l’I.H.É.S. 76
(1992), 99-109.

[BT]

M. Bocheński, A. Tralle, On Hirzebruch’s proportionality principle
and the non-existence of amenable Clifford-Klein forms of certain
homogeneous spaces, arXiv:1705.03221.

[BT1]

M. Bocheński, A. Tralle, On solvable compact Clifford-Klein
forms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145(2017), 1819-1832

[BT2]

M. Bocheński, A. Tralle, Generalized symplectic symmetric spaces,
Geom. Dedicata 171(2014),

[Bu]

J.-B. Butruille, Twistors and 3-symmetric spaces, J. London
Math. Soc. 96(2008), 738-766

[CM]

E. Calabi, L. Marcus, Relativistic space forms, Ann. Math.
75(1962), 63-76

[CR]

G. Calvaruso, A. Rosado, Ricci solitons on low-dimensional generalized symmetric spaces, ArXiv: 1606.09166

[C]

V. Cortéz, Handbook on pseudo-Riemaannian geometry and supersymmetry, European Math. Soc. 2010

[FHT]

Y. Félix, S. Halperin, J.-C. Thomas, Rational homotopy theory,
Springer, Berlin, 2001.

[FOT]

Y. Félix, J. Oprea, D. Tanré, Algebraic models in geometry, Oxford
Univ. Press, 2008.

[GHV]

V. Greub, S. Halperin, R. Vanstone, Curvature, connections and
cohomology, vol. 3, New York, 1976.

13

[HIL]

J. A. Hillmann, Four Manifolds, Geometries and Knots, Topology and Geometry Monographs, Geometry and Topology Publ.,
Coventry, 2002.

[Kob]

T. Kobayashi, Proper actions on a homogeneous space of reductive
type, Math. Ann. 285(1989), 249-263

[KO]

T. Kobayashi, K. Ono, Note on Hirzebruch’s proportionality principle , J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, 37(1990), 71-87

[KY]

T. Kobayashi, T. Yoshino, Compact Clifford-Klein forms of symmetric spaces revisited, Pure Appl. Math. Quart. 1(2005), 603-684

[Kow]

O. Kowalski, Generalized symmetric spaces, Springer, 1980

[K]

A. Knapp, Lei Groups beyond an Introduction, Birkhauser, 2002

[MA]

G. Margulis, Existence of compact quotients of homogeneous
spaces, measurably proper actions, and decay of matrix coefficients,
Bull. Soc. Math. France 125 (1997), 447-456.

[M]

Y. Morita A topological necessary condition for the existence of
compact Clifford-Klein forms, J. Diﬀerential Geom. 100 (2015),
533-545.

[OH]

H. Oh, Tempered subgroups and representations with minimal decay of matrix coefficients, Bull. Soc. Math. France 126 (1998),
355-380.

[OW]

H. Oh, D. Witte-Morris, Compact Clifford-Klein Forms of Homogeneous Spaces of SO(2,n), Geom. Dedicata 89 (2002), 25-56.

[SH]

Y. Shalom, Rigidity, unitary representations of semisimple groups,
and fundamental groups of manifolds with rank one transformation
group, Ann. of Math. 152 (2000), 113-182.

[Th]

N. Tholozan,Volume and non-existence of compact Clifford-Klein
forms, arXiv: 1511.09448[math.GT].

[T]

S. Terzic, Cohomology with real coefficients of generalized symmetric spaces, Fundam. Prikl. Mat. 7(2001), 131-157 (in Russian).
14

[W]

D. Witte-Morris, Superrigid subgroups and syndetic hulls, in:
Rigidity in Dynamics and Geometry, M. Burger and A. Iozzi
(eds.), Springer, 2002, 441-457

[WG]

J. Wolf, A. Gray, Homogeneous spaces defined by Lie group automorphisms, I, II, J. Diﬀerent. Geom. 2(1968), 77,114 and 115-159.

[VGS]

E. Vinberg, V. Gorbatsevich, O. Shvartsman, Discrete subgroups
in Lie groups, Itogi Nauki 21, Moscow, 1988 (in Russian)

15

