Energy saving for building heating
via a simple and efficient model-free control design:
First steps with computer simulations
Hassane Abouaïssa∗, Ola Alhaj Hasan† , Cédric Join‡¶k , Michel Fliess§¶ , and Didier Defer†

arXiv:1708.03800v2 [] 6 Sep 2017

∗ LGI2A

(EA 3926), Université d’Artois, 64200 Béthune, France. Email: hassane.abouaissa@univ-artois.fr
† LGCgE (EA 4515), Université d’Artois, 64200 Béthune, France.
Email: eng.3ola@gmail.com, didier.defer@univ-artois.fr
‡ CRAN (CNRS, UMR 7039), Université de Lorraine, BP 239, 54506 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Email: cedric.join@univ-lorraine.fr
§ LIX (CNRS, UMR 7161), École polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France. Email: Michel.Fliess@polytechnique.edu
¶ AL.I.E.N., 7 rue Maurice Barrès, 54330 Vézelise, France. Email: {michel.fliess, cedric.join}@alien-sas.com
k Projet Non-A, INRIA Lille – Nord-Europe, France.

Abstract—The model-based control of building heating systems
for energy saving encounters severe physical, mathematical and
calibration difficulties in the numerous attempts that has been
published until now. This topic is addressed here via a new
model-free control setting, where the need of any mathematical
description disappears. Several convincing computer simulations
are presented. Comparisons with classic PI controllers and
flatness-based predictive control are provided.
Keywords— Building heating, energy saving, model-free control,
intelligent P controllers, PI controllers, flatness-based control,
predictive control.

1. Introduction
The growing importance of energy saving explains the key
rôle of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC). It
raises many exciting questions (see, e.g., [31]). We concentrate
here on the building heating system. This topic, according to
[52], has not attracted enough investigation from the control
community. Let us mention here Boolean control, predictive
control, PIDs, optimal control, nonlinear control, partial differential equations, flatness-based control, fuzzy systems, neural
nets, . . . See, e.g., [3], [4], [6], [7], [8], [10], [11], [15], [16],
[20], [25], [26], [27], [32], [36], [39], [44], [46], [49], [50],
[52], [61], [64], [67], . . . The more “advanced” control approaches, which are listed above, are model-based. Here again,
like in most concrete situations, writing a “good” mathematical
model, where constraints and perturbations might be severe, is
quite beyond our reach especially if online calibration ought
to be performed. Those facts explain why in industrial practice
classic PIDs and Boolean control, which to a large extent
preclude any mathematical modeling, are most popular in spite
of some shortcomings: poor performances and delicate tuning.
The topic is addressed here via model-free control and their
corresponding intelligent controllers [21]. This setting,
•

where the need of any precise mathematical description disappears,

•

which is
–
–

inherently robust, since the perturbations are
easily taken into account,
easy to implement both from software and hardware viewpoints,

has already been successfully applied a number of times, and
in many countries. See, e.g., the references in [21], [1] and
the references therein, and [2], [5], [13], [14], [17], [18], [28],
[29], [30], [35], [38], [40], [41], [42], [43], [45], [47], [48],
[51], [53], [55], [56], [57], [62], [66], [68], [69], [70], [71],
[73], [74], [75], [76], [78], . . . Let us emphasize here [33] and
[13].
Our communication is organized as follows. Section 2
describes a simple linear model for the purpose of computer
simulations which are analyzed in Section 3. Comparisons
may be found there with proportional-integral (PI) controllers
and with flatness-based control. Some concluding remarks are
presented in Section 4. The large literature, that is already
available on model-free control, explains why we have not
incorporated any summary on this topic and on the related
intelligent controllers. Any interested reader in an easy-tounderstand introduction is invited to look at [33] and [13].

2. Modeling for computer simulations
Several authors (see, e.g., [65]) emphasized the necessity
to simplify a “full” mathematical description, which comprises
partial differential equations like, of course, the Fourier heat
equation. Many publications have been devoted to the derivation of a “simple” but “efficient” modeling (see, e.g., [6], [8],
[63], [72], and the references therein). Like in [7], a linear
model due to [19] is used:

 Ṫint =


Ṫwall =

Q
Ca

−
Kc
Cw

Kc
Ca

(Tint − Twall ) −

(Tint − Tw ) −

Kext
Ca

Kf
Ca

(Tint − Text )

(1)

(Twall − Text )

Tint , which has to be controlled via the the heat input Q, (resp.
Text , Twall ) is the inside (resp. outside, wall) temperature. The

other coefficients are suitable physical quantities. Their nominal values are borrowed from [12]: Ca = 1400, Cw = 2200,
Kc = 1.4, Kf = 0.004, Kext = 0.04.
Text should be viewed as a perturbation in the controltheoretic meaning of this word, i.e., Text is not regulated.

control, but without any optimization technique. From this
standpoint, the first Eq. in (1) yields


Kf ⋆
Kc
⋆
⋆
+
)T
Q = Ca Ṫint + (
Ca
Ca int

3. Comparisons of computer simulations

⋆
where Tint
is the reference trajectory for the internal temperature and Q⋆ the corresponding open-loop control. The
closed-loop control reads Q = Q⋆ + C(e), where C(e) is
some regulator.

3.1. Intelligent proportional controller
Start with the most important feedback device in modelfree control, i.e., the intelligent proportional controller (see
[21], and [13], [33]), or iP:
u=−

Festim − ẏ ⋆ − KP e
α

(2)

where y ⋆ is the reference trajectory, e = y − y ⋆ is the tracking
error, the usual tuning gain KP and the parameter α are chosen
by the practionner, Festim is an estimate of F in the ultra-local
model ẏ = F + αu. Set in Eq. (2) α = 0.5, KP = −0.5. It
yields Figure 1 where the results are excellent with the the
exception of two large errors in the tracking: Text becomes
too large and the control variable Q is non-negative. Figure 2
shows that those errors disappear if cooling is allowed, i.e., if
the sign of Q is arbitrary.
Remark 3.1. Lack of space prevents us from showing the
excellent results obtained with values of the coefficients in
Eq. (1) which are quite far from the nominal ones. Moreover, the tuning of our iP does not need to be modified.
Parameter identification becomes thus irrelevant.

3.2. PI
Introduce the classic proportional-integral (PI) controller
(see, e.g., [9]):
Z
Q = kp e + ki e
(3)
where e = y − y ⋆ is the tracking error, kp , ki are the usual
tuning gains. Set kp = −0.5, ki = −0.01. If, like too often in
the industrial world, we leave a step between two different
setpoints, Figures 3 and 1 show a significant performance
deterioration. When this step is replaced by the same smooth
reference trajectory used in Section 3.1, Figures 4 and 1
become almost identical. This result is not surprising. It is
known [21] that iPs and PIs are equivalent in some sense.

3.3.2. P. C(e) is a static state-feedback, i.e., nothing else than
a trivial P controller. Determine it by imposing a pole equal
to 0.01. The results in Figure 5 are poor. The perturbation
represented by the external temperature cannot be rejected if
it is not measured.
Remark 3.3. Let us add however that such a perturbation might
be measured and therefore rejected via some appropriate
tools (see, e.g., [22]).1
3.3.3. PI. C(e) is now a PI (3). The results in Figure 6, where
the gains are tuned such that there is a double pole equal to
−0.005, are rather good. Note however that the control input
fluctuates too quickly. With a double pole equal to −0.001, the
comparison of performances displayed in Figure 7 and Figure
1 show a poor robustness with respect to noises.
Remark 3.4. Section 3.3 confirms that a model-based standpoint might be cumbersome and, therefore, inappropriate.

4. Conclusion
Satisfactory computer simulations were presented via
model-free control and with a great ease. They will soon
be tested in a real building and hopefully confirmed. The
excellent results which were recently obtained with respect to
an experimental greenhouse [33] should make us optimistic.

References
[1] H. Abouaïssa, M. Fliess, C. Join, On ramp metering: Towards a better
understanding of ALINEA via model-free control. Int. J. Contr., 90, 10181026, 2017.
[2] J.T. Agee, I.E. Davidson, L.T. Kombani, Intelligent proportional integral
control of a polar axis solar tracker. Power Syst. Conf., Clemson, 2016.
[3] A. Afram, F. Janabi-Sharifi, Theory and applications of HVAC control
systems – A review of model predictive control (MPC). Building Enverinom., 72, 343-355, 2014.

Remark 3.2. In order to avoid steps we could have also
employed setpoint ramping (see, e.g., [37]).

[4] A. Afram, F. Janabi-Sharifi, A.S. Funga, K. Raahemifar, Artificial neural
network (ANN) based model predictive control (MPC) and optimization
of HVAC systems: A state of the art review and case study of a residential
HVAC system. Energ. Buildings, 141, 96-113, 2017.

3.3. Flatness-based predictive control

[5] Y. Al Younes, A. Drak, H. Noura, A. Rabhi, A. El Hajjaji, Robust modelfree control applied to a quadrotor UAV. J. Intellig. Robot. Syst., 84,
37-52, 2016.

3.3.1. Generalities. Flatness-based control, which was introduced more than 25 years ago [23], certainly is one of the very
few academic advances which have become popular in the
industrial world (see also, e.g., [9], [24], [34], [54], [58], [59],
[77]). It might be viewed as another way of doing predictive

[6] O. Alhaj Hasan, Optimization of Building Energy Consumption Using
Simplified Models and New Control Methods. Thèse, Université Lille 1,
2014.
1. Such a control design is often called Active Disturbance Rejection
Control, or ADRC (see, e.g., [60] and the references therein).

3

22
2.5

21
2
20
1.5
19

1
18

0.5

17

0

16
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0

10

20

30

Time in hour

40

50

60

70

60

70

60

70

Time in hour

(a) Control

(b) Reference (- -) and temperature
Figure 1. iP with heating

3

22

2

21

1

20

0

19

-1

18

-2

17

-3

16
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0

10

20

30

Time in hour

40

50

Time in hour

(a) Control

(b) Reference (- -) and temperature
Figure 2. iP with heating and cooling

3
24

23

2.5

22
2
21

1.5

20

19
1
18
0.5
17

0

16
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0

Time in hour

10

20

30

40

50

Time in hour

(a) Control

(b) Reference (- -) and temperature
Figure 3. PI with steps

3

22
2.5

21
2
20
1.5
19

1
18

0.5

17

0

16
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0

10

20

30

Time in hour

40

50

60

70

60

70

60

70

Time in hour

(a) Control

(b) Reference (- -) and temperature
Figure 4. PI with a smooth reference trajectory

3
24
2.5

23

22

2

21
1.5
20

19

1

18
0.5
17

0

16
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0

10

20

30

Time in hour

40

50

Time in hour

(a) Control

(b) Reference (- -) and temperature
Figure 5. Flatness and P

3

22
2.5

21
2
20
1.5
19

1
18

0.5

17

0

16
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0

Time in hour

10

20

30

40

50

Time in hour

(a) Control

(b) Reference (- -) and temperature
Figure 6. Flatness and PI

3
25

24
2.5
23
2

22

21
1.5
20
1

19

18
0.5
17

0

16
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0

10

Time in hour

20

30

40

50

60

70

Time in hour

(a) Control

(b) Reference (- -) and temperature
Figure 7. Flatness and PI with “small” poles

[7] O. Alhaj Hasan, H. Abouaïssa, I. Shahrour, D. Defer, Building energy
consumption flatness-based control using algebraic on-line estimation.
Ener. Efficien., 10, 657-671, 2017.
[8] O. Alhaj Hasan, D. Defer, I. Shahrour, A simplified building thermal
model for the optimization of energy consumption: Use of a random
number generator, Energ. Buildings, 82, 322–329, 2014.
[9] K.J. Åström, R.M. Murray, Feedback Systems: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Princeton University Press, 2008.
[10] A. Aswani, N. Master, J. Taneja, D. Culler, C. Tomlin. Reducing transient and steady state electricity consumption in HVAC using learningbased model-predictive control. Proc. IEEE, 100, 240-253, 2012.
[11] R. Bălan, J. Cooper, K.-M. Chao, S. Stana, R. Donca, Parameter
identification and model based predictive control of temperature inside a
house. Energ. Buildings, 43, 748–758, 2011.
[12] R. Bălan, R. Donca, A. Balan, A. Pleşa, L. Pacurar, V. Muresan, Thermal
modelling and temperature control of a house. Roman. Rev. Precis. Mech.
Opt. Mechatron., 39, 59-62, 2011.
[13] O. Bara, M. Olama, S. Djouadi, T. Kuruganti, M. Fliess, C. Join,
Model-free load control for high penetration of solar photovoltaic generation. 49th North Amer. Power Symp., Morgantown, 2017. Online:
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01558647/en/

[14] A. Ben Hmedi, T. Bakir, S. B.inczak, A. Sakly, Model free control
for muscular force by functional electrical stimulation using pulse width
modulation. 4th Int. Conf. Contr. Engin. Informat. Techno., Hammamet,
2016.
[15] T. Berthou, P. Stabat, R. Salvazet, D. Marchio, Optimal control for building heating: An elementary school case study. 13th Conf. Int. Building
Perform. Simula. Assoc., Chambéry, 2013.
[16] G. Bianchini, M. Casini, A. Vicino, D. Zarrilli, Demand-response in
building heating systems: A model predictive control approach. Appl.
Energ., 168,159-170, 2016.

[21] M. Fliess, C. Join, Model-free control. Int. J. Contr., 86, 2228-2252,
2013.
[22] M. Fliess, C. Join, H. Sira-Ramírez, Non-linear estimation is easy. Int.
J. Model. Identif. Contr., 4, 12-27, 2008.
[23] M. Fliess, J. Lévine, P. Martin, P. Rouchon, Flatness and defect of nonlinear systems: introductory theory and examples. Int. J. Contr. 61, 13271361, 1995.
[24] M. Fliess, R. Marquez, Continuous-time linear predictive control and
flatness: a module-theoretic setting with examples. Int. J. Contr., 73, 606623, 2000.
[25] R.W. Hittle, D.C. Hittle, Control Systems for Heating, Ventilating, and
Air Conditioning (6th ed.). Springer, 2003.
[26] I. Hazyuk, C. Ghiaus, D. Penhouet, Optimal temperature control of
intermittently heated buildings using Model Predictive Control: Part II
– Control algorithm. Building Environm., 51, 388–394, 2012.
[27] S.D. Howell, P.V. Johnson, P.W. Duck, A rapid PDE-based optimization
methodology for temperature control and other mixed stochastic and
deterministic systems. Energ. Buildings, 43, 1523-1530, 2011.
[28] J.-H. Jeong, D.-H. Lee, M. Kim, W.H. Park, G.-S. Byun, The study
of the electromagnetic robot with a four-wheel drive and applied I-PID
system. J. Electric. Engin. Techno., 12, 1634-1640, 2017.
[29] C. Join, J. Bernier, S. Mottelet, M. Fliess, S. Rechdaoui-Guérin, S.
Azimi, V. Rocher, A simple and efficient feedback control strategy for
wastewater denitrification. 20th World Congr. Int. Feder. Automat. Contr.,
Toulouse, 2017. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01488199/en/
[30] G.H. Kim, O.-H. Kwon, A.-S. Oh, The study of model-free control
system based on intelligent PID controller. Information, 19, 2693-2698,
2016.
[31] J. Khazaii, Energy-Efficient HVAC Design, Springer, 2014.

[17] L. Cao, H. Li, H. Zhang, Model-free power control of front-end PFC
AC/DC converter for on-board charger. 8th IEEE Int. Conf. Power Electron. Motion Contr., Hefei, 2016.

[32] C. Koch-Ciobotaru, Model predictive control for inside temperature of
an energy efficient building. V.E. Balas, J. Fodor, A.R. Várkonyi-Kóczy,
J. Dombi, L.C. Jain (Eds): Soft Computing Applications, pp. 197-208,
Springer, 2013.

[18] A.N. Chand, M. Kawanishi, T. Narikiyo, Non-linear model-free control
of flapping wing flying robot using iPID. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automat.,
Stockholm, 2016.

[33] F. Lafont, J.-F. Balmat, N. Pessel, M. Fliess, A model-free control
strategy for an experimental greenhouse with an application to fault
accommodation. Comput. Electron. Agricult., 100, 139-149, 2015.

[19] J.A. Crabb, N. Murdoch, J.M. Penman, A simplified thermal response
model. Building Serv. Engin. Res. Techno., 8, 13-19, 1987.

[34] J. Lévine, Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems: A Flatness-based
Approach, Springer, 2009.

[20] P.M. Ferreira, A.E. Ruano, S. Silva, E.Z.E. Conceição, Neural networks
based predictive control for thermal comfort and energy savings in public
buildings. Energ. Buildings, 55, 238-251, 2012.

[35] S. Li, H. Wang, Y. Tian, A. Aitouch, J. Klein, Direct power control of
DFIG wind turbine systems based on an intelligent proportional-integral
sliding mode control. ISA Trans., 64, 431-439, 2016.

[36] X. Li, J. Wen, Review of building energy modeling for control and
operation. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 37, 517-537, 2014.
[37] B.G. Lipták, Process Control. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1995.
[38] S. Liu, Z. Hou, J. Zheng, Attitude adjustment of quadrotor aircraft
platform via a data-driven model free adaptive control cascaded with
intelligent PID. Chinese Contr. Decis. Conf., Yinchuan, 2016.
[39] X. Ma, J. Dong, S.M. Djouadi, J.J. Nutaro, T. Kuruganti, Stochastic control of energy efficient buildings: A semidefinite programming approach.
IEEE Int. Conf. Smart Grid Comm, Miami, 2015.
[40] S. Maalej, A. Kruszewski, L. Belkoura, Robust control for continuous
LPV system with restricted-model-based control. Circ. Syst. Sign. Process., 36, 2499-2520, 2017.
[41] L. Menhour, B. d’Andréa-Novel, M. Fliess, D. Gruyer, H. Mounier,
An efficient model-free setting for longitudinal and lateral vehicle
control. Validation through the interconnected pro-SiVIC/RTMaps prototyping platform. IEEE Trans. Intel. Transport. Syst., 2017. DOI:
10.1109/TITS.2017.2699283

[42] L. Michel, O. Ghibaudo, O. Messal, A. Kedous-Lebouc, C. Boudinet,
F. Blache, A. Labonne, Model-free based digital control for magnetic
measurements. 2017. arXiv:1703.05395
[43] L. Michel, O. Ghibaudo, M. Oualid, A. Lebouc, C. Boudinet, F. Blache,
A. Labonne, Commande “sans modèle” pour l’asservissement numérique
d’un banc de caractérisation magnétique. 2e Symp. Gén. Électr., Grenoble,
2016.
[44] N. Mendes, G.H.C. Oliveira, H.X. Araújo, L.S. Coelho, A Matlab-based
simulation tool for building thermal performance analysis. 8th Int. IBPSA
Conf., Eindhoven, 2003.
[45] T. MohammadRidha, M. Aït-Ahmed, L. Chailloux, M. Krempf, I. Guilhem, J.-Y. Poirier, C.H. Moog, Model free iPID control for glycemia
regulation of type-1 diabetes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engin., 2017. DOI:
10.1109/TBME.2017.2698036

[46] S.N. Murray, B.P. Walsh, D. Kelliher, D.T.J. O’Sullivan, Multi-variable
optimization of thermal energy efficiency retrofitting of buildings using
static modelling and genetic algorithms: A case study. Building Environ.,
75, 98-107, 2014.
[47] J. Pardelhas, M. Silva, L. Mendonça, L. Baptista, Speed control of an
experimental pneumatic engine. P. Garrido, F. Soares, A.P. Moreira (Eds):
Controlo 2016, Lect. Notes Electrin. Engin. 402, pp. 821-829, Springer,
2017.
[48] P. Polack, B. d’Andréa-Novel, M. Fliess, A. de La Fortelle, L. Menhour,
Finite-time stabilization of longitudinal control for autonomous vehicles
using an adaptive model-free approach. 20th World Congr. Int. Feder.
Automat. Contr., Toulouse, 2017.
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01498358/en/

[49] R. Ooka, K. Komamura, Optimal design method for building energy
systems using genetic algorithms. 6th Int. Conf. Indoor Air Qualit. Ventil.
Energy Conserv. Buildings, Sendai, 2007.

[56] R.-C. Roman, M.-B. Radac, R.-E. Precup, Multi-input–multi-output
system experimental validation of model-free control and virtual reference
feedback tuning techniques. IET Contr. Theory Appl., 10, 1395-1403,
2016.
[57] L. Sidhom, I. Chihi, S. Sahraoui, A. Abdelkrim, Intelligent-PI controller
for electro-hydraulic system. 4th Int. Conf. Contr. Engin. Inform. Techno.,
Hammamet, 2016.
[58] F. Rotella, I. Zambettakis, Commande des systèmes par platitude. Techniques de l’Ingénieur S7450 V1, 2007.
[59] H. Sira-Ramírez, S. K. Agrawal, Differentially Flat Systems. Marcel
Decker, 2004.
[60] H. Sira-Ramírez, A. Luviano-Juárez, M. Ramírez-Neria, E.W. ZuritaBustamante, Active Disturbance Rejection Control of Dynamic Systems:
A Flatness Based Approach. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017.
[61] J. Široký, F. Oldewurtel, J. Cigler, S. Prívara, Experimental analysis of
model predictive control for an energy efficient building heating system.
Appl. Energ., 88, 3079-3087, 2011.
[62] P. Ťapák, M. Huba, Laboratory model of thermal plant identification and
control. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49-6, 2016.
[63] B. Tashtoush, M. Molhim, M. Al-Rousan, Dynamic model of an HVAC
system for control analysis. Energy, 30,1729-1745, 2005.
[64] C. Turhan, S. Simani, I. Zajic, G.G. Akkurt, Analysis and application
of advanced control strategies to a heating element nonlinear model. IOP
Conf. Series: J. Phys. Conf. Series, 783, 2017.
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/783/1/012027

[65] C.P. Underwood, An improved lumped parameter method for building
thermal modelling. Energ. Buildings, 79, 191-201, 2014.
[66] H. Wang, S. Li, Y. Tian, A. Aitouche, Intelligent proportional differential
neural network control for unknown nonlinear system. Stud. Informat.
Contr., 25, 445-452, 2016.
[67] S. Wang, Z. Ma, Supervisory and optimal control of building HVAC
systems: A review. HVAC&R, 14, 3-32, 2008.
[68] J. Wang, H. Mounier, S.-I. Niculescu, Event-driven model-free control
in motion control with comparisons. IMA J. Math. Contr. Informat., 32,
1-21, 2016.
[69] H. Wang, Y. Tian, S. Han, X. Wang, ZMP theory-based gait planning and
model-free trajectory tracking control of lower limb carrying exoskeleton
system. Stud. Informat. Contr., 26, 161-170, 2017.
[70] H. Wang, X. Ye, Y. Tian, G. Zheng, N. Christov, Model-free based
terminal SMC of quadrotor attitude and position. IEEE Trans. Aerosp.
Electron. Syst., 52, 2519-2528, 2016.
[71] H.P. Wang, D. Zheng, Y. Tian, High pressure common rail injection
system modeling and control. ISA Trans., 63, 265-273, 2016.
[72] S. Wu, J.-Q. Sun, A physics-based linear parametric model of room
temperature in office buildings. Building Environ., 50, 1-9, 2012.

[50] B. Paris, J. Eynard, S. Grieu, T. Talbert, M. Polit, Heating control
schemes for energy management in buildings. Energ. Buildings, 42, 1908–
1917, 2010.

[73] Y. Xin, Z.-C. Qin, W.-G. Wu, J.-Q. Sun, Partial model-free control of a
2-input and 2-output helicopter system. 9th Europ. Nonlin. Dynam. Conf.,
Budapest, 2017.

[51] R.E. Precup, M.-B. Radac, R.-C. Roman, E.M. Petriuc, Model-free
sliding mode control of nonlinear systems: Algorithms and experiments.
Informat. Sci., 381, 176-192, 2017..

[74] C.-Y. Yu, J.-L. Wu, Intelligent PID control for two-wheeled inverted
pendulums. Int. Conf. System Sci. Engin., Puli, 2016.

[52] S. Prívara, J. Široký, L. Ferkel, J. Cigler, Model predictive control of
a building heating system: The first experience. Energ. Buildings, 43,
564–572, 2011.
[53] M.B. Radac, R.-E. Precup, Model-free constrained data-driven iterative
reference input tuning algorithm with experimental validation. Int. J. Gen.
Syst., 45, 455-476, 2016.
[54] G.G. Rigatos, Nonlinear Control and Filtering Using Differential Flatness Approaches – Applications to Electromechanical Systems, Springer,
2015.
[55] R.-C. Roman, R.-E. Precup, M.-B. Radac, Model-free fuzzy control
of twin rotor aerodynamic systems. 25th Med. Conf. Contr. Automat.,
Valetta, 2017.

[75] X. Zhang, Model-free motion control of positioning stage. Delft University of Technology: Master Thesis, 2016.
[76] X. Zhang, H. Wang, Y. Tian, L. Peyrodie, X. Wang, Model-free based
neural network control with time-delay estimation for lower extremity
exoskeleton. Neurocomput., 2017
[77] M. Zeitz, Differenzielle Flachheit: Eine nützliche Methodik auch für
lineare SISO-Systeme. Automatisierungstechn., 58, 5-13, 2010.
[78] Y. Zhou, H. Li, H. Yao, Model-free control of surface mounted PMSM
drive system. IEEE Int. Conf. Indus. Techno., Taipei, 2016.

