Directional Modulation Design Based on
Crossed-Dipole Arrays for Two Signals With
Orthogonal Polarisations
Bo Zhang, Wei Liu1 and Xiang Lan

arXiv:1801.00418v1 [eess.SP] 1 Jan 2018

Communications Research Group, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering
University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4ET, United Kingdom
1
w.liu@sheffield.ac.uk

Abstract—Directional modulation (DM) is a physical layer
security technique based on antenna arrays and so far the
polarisation information has not been considered in its designs. To
increase the channel capacity, we consider exploiting the polarisation information and send two different signals simultaneously at
the same direction, same frequency, but with different polarisations. These two signals can also be considered as one composite
signal using the four dimensional (4-D) modulation scheme across
the two polarisation diversity channels. In this paper, based on
cross-dipole arrays, we formulate the design to find a set of
common weight coefficients to achieve directional modulation for
such a composite signal and examples are provided to verify the
effectiveness of the proposed method.

Index Terms— Directional modulation, crossed-dipole array, orthogonal polarisations.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Directional modulation (DM) is a physical layer security
technique which keeps known constellation mappings in a
desired direction or directions, while scrambling them for the
remaining ones [1, 2]. Both reconfigurable arrays and phased
array structures can be used for its design. For reconfigurable
arrays, their elements are switched for each symbol to make
their constellation points not scrambled in desired directions,
but distorted in other directions [3]. For phased arrays [4, 5],
DM can be implemented by phase shifting the transmitted
antenna signals properly. In [6], a method named dual beam
DM was introduced, where the I and Q signals are transmitted
by different antennas. The bit error rate (BER) performance of
a system based on a two-antenna array was studied using the
DM technique for eight phase shift keying modulation in [7].
A more systematic pattern synthesis approach was presented
in [8], followed by an orthogonal vector approach which
produces an artificial orthogonal noise vector from information
to achieve DM in [9], and energy-constrained design in [10].

Recently, the time modulation technique was introduced to
DM to form a four-dimensional (4-D) antenna array in [11].
However, the polarisation information is not exploited in all
aforementioned DM designs, and a single signal is transmitted
through the propagation channel. To increase system capacity,
we can exploit the polarisation information of the electromagnetic signal and send two different signals simultaneously at
the same direction, same frequency, but different polarisations.
This can be achieved by employing polarisation-sensitive arrays, such as tripole arrays and crossed-dipole arrays [12–18].
These two signals can also be considered as one composite
signal using the four dimensional (4-D) modulation scheme
across the two polarisation diversity channels [16, 19, 20].
In this paper, based on this idea, we proposed a DM design
using crossed-dipole arrays, which can send two separate
signals (S1 and S2 ) with orthogonal polarisation states to
the same direction simultaneously. To receive and separate
the two orthogonally polarised signals, at the receiver side,
a crossed-dipole antenna or array is needed, similar to the
transmitter side [21]. However, the polarisation directions of
the antennas at the receiver side do not need to match those of
the transmitted signals, as cross-interference due to a mismatch
can be solved easily using some standard signal processing
techniques [16].
The remaining part of this paper is structured as follows.
A review of polarised beamforming based on crossed-dipole
arrays is given in Sec. II. Directional modulation designs
for two signals transmitted to the same direction, but with
orthogonal polarisation states are presented in Sec. III. In Sec.
IV, design examples are provided, with conclusions drawn in
Sec. V.

II. R EVIEW OF P OLARISED B EAMFORMING
A narrowband linear array for transmit beamforming based
on N crossed-dipole antennas is shown in Fig. 1. For each
antenna, there are two orthogonally orientated dipoles, and the
one parallel to the x axis is connected to a complex valued
weight coefficient represented by wn,x , and the one parallel
to the y axis is connected to wn,y for n = 0, . . . , N − 1. The
spacing from the first antenna to its subsequent antennas is
represented by dn for n = 1, . . . , N − 1. The elevation angle
is denoted by θ ∈ [0, π] and azimuth angle is represented by
φ ∈ [0, 2π]. The spatial steering vector of the array, a function
of elevation angle θ and azimuth angle φ, is given by
ss (θ, φ) = [1, e−jωd1 sin θ sin φ/c , . . . , e−jωdN −1 sin θ sin φ/c ]T ,
(1)
T
where {·} is the transpose operation, and c is the speed of
propagation. For a uniform linear array (ULA) with a halfwavelength spacing (dn − dn−1 = λ/2), the spatial steering
vector can be simplified to
ss (θ, φ) = [1, e−jπ sin θ sin φ , . . . , e−jπ(N −1) sin θ sin φ ]T . (2)
Moreover, the spatial-polarisation coherent vector of the signal
is given by [21, 22]
"
#
− sin φ cos γ + cos φ cos θ sin γejη
sp (θ, φ, γ, η) =
cos φ cos γ + sin φ cos θ sin γejη
"
#
(3)
spx (θ, φ, γ, η)
,
=
spy (θ, φ, γ, η)
where γ ∈ [0, π/2] is the auxiliary polarisation angle and η ∈
[−π, π) represents the polarisation phase difference.
For convenience, we split the array structure into two subarrays: one is parallel to the x-axis and the other to the y-axis.
Then, the steering vectors of the two sub-arrays are given by
sx (θ, φ, γ, η) =spx (θ, φ, γ, η)ss (θ, φ),

(4)

sy (θ, φ, γ, η) =spy (θ, φ, γ, η)ss (θ, φ).
The beam response of the array can be given by [23]
p(θ, φ, γ, η) = wH s(θ, φ, γ, η),

(5)

where {·}H represents the Hermitian transpose, s(θ, φ, γ, η),
a 2N × 1 vector representing the overall steering vector of the
array, is given by
s(θ, φ, γ, η) =[sx (θ, φ, γ, η), sy (θ, φ, γ, η)]T ,

z
澳T
澳d 

澳d N 

澳I

y

x
Fig. 1. A crossed-dipole linear array.

and w is the complex valued weight vector
w = [w0,x , . . . , wN −1,x , w0,y , . . . , wN −1,y ]T .

(7)

III. D IRECTIONAL M ODULATION D ESIGN
In traditional crossed-dipole array design, the weight coefficients are designed for one single beam response and therefore
can only cater for one transmitted DM signal. To increase
the transmission capacity, in this section, we design a set of
common weight coefficients for two signals (S1 and S2 ) with
orthogonal polarisation states transmitted to the same direction
simultaneously. Based on the parameter representations in Sec.
II, we have s(θ, φ, γ1 , η1 ), s(θ, φ, γ2 , η2 ), p(θ, φ, γ1 , η1 ), and
p(θ, φ, γ2 , η2 ) to represent steering vectors for S1 and S2 , and
beam responses for S1 and S2 , respectively.
For M -ary signaling, such as multiple phase shift keying
(MPSK), each of S1 and S2 can create M constellation points
(M symbols), leading to M desired responses. Then, for S1
and S2 transmitted simultaneously, there are M 2 different
symbols and M 2 sets of response pairs, represented by a
1 × 2 vector pm (θ, φ, γ, η) for m = 0, . . . , M 2 − 1, and
each response pm (θ, φ, γ, η) corresponds to a weight vector wm = [w0,x,m , . . . , wN −1,x,m , w0,y,m , . . . , wN −1,y,m ]T .
Here, we assume r points are sampled in the mainlobe and
R − r points in the sidelobe range; then the responses for
two signals in the mainlobe direction pM L,m and the sidelobe
range pSL,m are given by
pSL,m = [pm (θ0 , φ, γ1 , η1 ), . . . , pm (θR−r−1 , φ, γ1 , η1 )
pm (θ0 , φ, γ2 , η2 ), . . . , pm (θR−r−1 , φ, γ2 , η2 )],

T

sx (θ, φ, γ, η) =[s0,x (θ, φ, γ, η), . . . , sN −1,x (θ, φ, γ, η)] ,
T

sy (θ, φ, γ, η) =[s0,y (θ, φ, γ, η), . . . , sN −1,y (θ, φ, γ, η)] ,
(6)

pM L,m = [pm (θR−r , φ, γ1 , η1 ), . . . , pm (θR−1 , φ, γ1 , η1 )
pm (θR−r , φ, γ2 , η2 ), . . . , pm (θR−1 , φ, γ2 , η2 )].
(8)

SSL = [s(θ0 , φ, γ1 , η1 ), . . . , s(θR−r−1 , φ, γ1 , η1 )
s(θ0 , φ, γ2 , η2 ), . . . , s(θR−r−1 , φ, γ2 , η2 )],
SM L = [s(θR−r , φ, γ1 , η1 ), . . . , s(θR−1 , φ, γ1 , η1 )

0
S Re (symbol 0000)
S 1 (symbol 00)

-10

Beam pattern (dB)

Here we have implicitly assumed that all the responses are
considered with a fixed φ. Moreover, we put all the 2(R − r)
steering vectors of both S1 and S2 at the sidelobe region into
an 2N × 2(R − r) matrix SSL , and the 2r steering vectors
at the mainlobe direction into an 2N × 2r matrix, denoted by
SM L , where

S 2 (symbol 00)

-20
-30
-40
-50

(9)

-60
-90

-60

-30

s(θR−r , φ, γ2 , η2 ), . . . , s(θR−1 , φ, γ2 , η2 )].

wH
m SM L

= pM L,m ,

(10)

where || · ||2 denotes the l2 norm. The objective function in
(10) ensures a minimum difference between the desired and
designed responses for two signals in the sidelobe, and the
constraint keeps a desired constellation value of two signals to
the mainlobe. To ensure that the constellation is scrambled in
the sidelobe regions, the phase of the desired response for two
signals pSL,m at different sidelobe directions can be randomly
generated.
The problem in (10) can be solved by the method of
Lagrange multipliers, and the optimum value for the weight
vector wm is given in (11), where R = SSL SH
SL .
H
−1
wm =R−1 (SSL pH
SM L )−1
SL,m − SM L ((SM L R
−1
H
(SH
SSL pH
M LR
SL,m − pM L,m ))).

90

S Re (symbol 0001)
S 1 (symbol 00)

-10

Beam pattern (dB)

subject to

||pSL,m −

60

0

-40

-60

-30

0

30

60

90

θ (degree)

(b)
0
S Re (symbol 0011)
S 1 (symbol 00)

-10

S 2 (symbol 11)

-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
-90

As these two signals S1 and S2 are modulated to generate
a 4-D modulated signal SRe in the far-field, to separate the
corresponding components from the received composite signal,
at the receiver side, we need a crossed-dipole antenna array
in the same way as given in [16].

-60

-30

0

30

60

90

θ (degree)

(c)
0
S Re (symbol 0010)
S 1 (symbol 00)

-10

Beam pattern (dB)

In this section, we provide design examples based on a
9λ aperture ULA with a half wavelength spacing between
adjacent antennas to show the performance of the proposed
formulations. The polarisation characteristics are defined by
(γ1 , η1 ) = (0◦ , 0◦ ) for S1 for a horizontal polarisation, and
(γ2 , η2 ) = (90◦ , 0◦ ) for S2 for a vertical polarisation. For
each of S1 and S2 , the desired response is a value of one
(magnitude) with 90◦ phase shift at the mainlobe (QPSK), i.e.,
symbols ‘00’, ‘01’, ‘11’, ‘10’ correspond to 45◦ , 135◦ , −45◦
and −135◦ , respectively, and a value of 0.1 (magnitude) with

-30

-60
-90

(11)

IV. D ESIGN EXAMPLES

S 2 (symbol 01)

-20

-50

Beam pattern (dB)

min

30

(a)

Then, for the m-th symbol, its corresponding weight coefficients can be solved by
wH
m SSL ||2

0

θ (degree)

S 2 (symbol 10)

-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
-90

-60

-30

0

30

60

90

θ (degree)

(d)
Fig. 2. Resultant beam responses based on the design (10) for symbols (a)
‘00,00’, (b)‘00,01’, (c)‘00,11’, (d)‘00,10’.

180
135

Phase angle

90
45
0
-45
-90
S 1 (symbol 00)

-135
-180
-90

S 2 (symbol 00)

-60

-30

0

30

60

90

θ (degree)

(a)
180
135

Phase angle

90
45
0
-45
-90
S 1 (symbol 00)

-135
-180
-90

S 2 (symbol 01)

-60

-30

0

30

60

90

θ (degree)

(b)
180
135

random phase shifts over the sidelobe regions. Therefore, for
signals S1 and S2 transmitted simultaneously, we can construct
16 different symbols. Moreover, without loss of generality, we
assume the mainlobe direction is θM L = 0◦ for φ = 90◦
and the sidelobe regions are θSL ∈ [5◦ , 90◦ ] for φ = ±90◦ ,
sampled every 1◦ , representing two signals are transmitted
through the y − z plane.
With the above parameters and design formulations in (10),
the composite beam patterns for symbols ‘00,00’, ‘00,01’,
‘00,11’ and ‘00,10’ are shown in Figs. 2(a), 2(b), 2(c) and
2(d), where all main beams are exactly pointed to 0◦ (3.01dB
√
or 2 magnitude) with a reasonable sidelobe level, and its
corresponding components for S1 and S2 coincide in the
mainlobe direction with 0dB mainlobe level, representing that
a value of one for magnitude of desired signals S1 and S2
has been satisfied. The phase patterns for these symbols are
displayed in Figs. 3(a), 3(b), 3(c), 3(d). We can see that the
phases of S1 and S2 in the desired direction match the standard
QPSK constellation, while for the rest of the θ angles, phases
are random, demonstrating that directional modulation has
been achieved effectively. The beam and phase patterns for
other symbols are not shown as they have the same features
as the aforementioned figures.
V. C ONCLUSIONS

Phase angle

90
45
0
-45
-90
S 1 (symbol 00)

-135
-180
-90

S 2 (symbol 11)

-60

-30

0

30

60

90

θ (degree)

(c)
180
135

Phase angle

90
45
0
-45
-90

R EFERENCE

S 1 (symbol 00)

-135
-180
-90

S 2 (symbol 10)

-60

-30

0

30

60

A crossed-dipole antenna array for directional modulation
has been proposed for the first time, and a set of common
weight coefficients has been designed for two signals S1 and
S2 with orthogonal polarisation states transmitted to the same
direction, based on a fixed given array geometry. As these
two signals are modulated to generate a 4-D modulated signal
SRe in the far-field, to receive and separate the corresponding
components from the resultant SRe , at the receiver side, a
crossed-dipole antenna array is needed. As shown in the
provided design examples, for both S1 and S2 , a mainlobe
and standard phase pattern have been achieved in the desired
direction with low sidelobe level and scrambled phases in other
directions.

90

θ (degree)

(d)
Fig. 3. Resultant phase responses based on the design (10) for symbols (a)
‘00,00’, (b)‘00,01’, (c)‘00,11’, (d)‘00,10’.

[1] A. Babakhani, D. B. Rutledge, and A. Hajimiri. Transmitter architectures based on near-field direct antenna
modulation.
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits,
43(12):2674–2692, December 2008.
[2] A. Babakhani, D. B. Rutledge, and A. Hajimiri. Nearfield direct antenna modulation. IEEE Microwave Magazine, 10(1):36–46, February 2009.

[3] M. P. Daly and J. T. Bernhard. Beamsteering in pattern
reconfigurable arrays using directional modulation. IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 58(7):2259–
2265, March 2010.
[4] M. P. Daly and J. T. Bernhard. Directional modulation
technique for phased arrays. IEEE Transactions on
Antennas and Propagation, 57(9):2633–2640, September
2009.
[5] B. Zhang, W. Liu, and X. Gou. Compressive sensing
based sparse antenna array design for directional modulation. IET Microwaves, Antennas Propagation, 11(5):634–
641, April 2017.
[6] T. Hong, M. Z. Song, and Y. Liu. Dual-beam directional
modulation technique for physical-layer secure communication. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation
Letters, 10:1417–1420, December 2011.
[7] H. Z. Shi and A. Tennant. Enhancing the security of
communication via directly modulated antenna arrays.
IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, 7(8):606–
611, June 2013.
[8] Y. Ding and V. Fusco. Directional modulation transmitter
radiation pattern considerations. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, 7(15):1201–1206, December 2013.
[9] Y. Ding and V. Fusco. A vector approach for the
analysis and synthesis of directional modulation transmitters. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation,
62(1):361–370, January 2014.
[10] Y. Ding and V. Fusco. Constraining directional modulation transmitter radiation patterns. IET Microwaves,
Antennas & Propagation, 8(15):1408–1415, September
2014.
[11] Q. J. Zhu, S. W. Yang, R. L. Yao, and Z. P. Nie. Directional modulation based on 4-D antenna arrays. IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 62(2):621–
628, February 2014.
[12] R. T. Compton. On the performance of a polarization
sensitive adaptive array. IEEE Transactions on Antennas
and Propagation, 29(5):718–725, September 1981.
[13] A. Nehorai and E. Paldi. Digital Signal Processing
Handbook, chapter Electromagnetic vector-sensor array
processing, pages 65.1–65.26. CRC Press, 1998.
[14] S. Miron, N. Le Bihan, and J. I. Mars. QuaternionMUSIC for vector-sensor array processing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 54(4):1218–1229, April
2006.
[15] X. M. Gou, Y. G. Xu, Z. W. Liu, and X. F. Gong.

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

Quaternion-Capon beamformer using crossed-dipole arrays. In Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Microwave, Antenna, Propagation, and EMC Technologies
for Wireless Communications (MAPE), pages 34–37,
Beijing, China, November 2011.
W. Liu. Antenna array signal processing for a quaternionvalued wireless communication system. In Proc. the
Benjamin Franklin Symposium on Microwave and Antenna Sub-systems (BenMAS), Philadelphia, US, September 2014.
M. B. Hawes and W. Liu. Design of fixed beamformers
based on vector-sensor arrays. International Journal
of Antennas and Propagation, 2015:181937.1–181937.9,
March 2015.
J. J. Xiao and A. Nehorai. Optimal polarized beampattern
synthesis using a vector antenna array. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 57(2):576–587, February
2009.
O. M. Isaeva and V. A. Sarytchev. Quaternion presentations polarization state. In Proc. 2nd IEEE Topical
Symposium of Combined Optical-Microwave Earth and
Atmosphere Sensing, pages 195–196, Atlanta, US, April
1995.
L. H. Zetterberg and H. Brandstrom. Codes for combined phase and amplitude modulated signals in a fourdimensional space. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 25(29):943–950, September 1977.
X. Lan and W. Liu. Fully quaternion-valued adaptive
beamforming based on crossed-dipole arrays. Electronics, 6(2):34, April 2017.
X. R. Zhang, W. Liu, Y. G. Xu, and Z. W. Liu.
Quaternion-valued robust adaptive beamformer for electromagnetic vector-sensor arrays with worst-case constraint. Signal Processing, 104:274–283, April 2014.
M. B. Hawes, W. Liu, and L. Mihaylova. Compressive
sensing based design of sparse tripole arrays. Sensors,
15(12):31056–31068, December 2015.

