) . on may 16 , 2006 the university released their findings ; the investigative committee agreed unanimously that churchill had engaged in " serious research misconduct " , including fa ##ls ##ification , fabrication , and two of the three allegations of pl ##agi ##aris ##m . the committee was divided on the appropriate level of sanctions . the standing committee on research misconduct accepted the findings of the investigative committee but also disagreed on what sanctions should be imposed . churchill ' s appeal against his proposed dismissal was considered by a panel of the university ' s privilege and tenure committee , which found that two of the seven findings of misconduct did not constitute dismiss ##ible offences . three members recommended that the penalty
). on may 16, 2006 the university released their findings ; the investigative committee agreed unanimously that churchill had engaged in " serious research misconduct ", including falsification, fabrication, and two of the three allegations of plagiarism. the committee was divided on the appropriate level of sanctions. the standing committee on research misconduct accepted the findings of the investigative committee but also disagreed on what sanctions should be imposed. churchill's appeal against his proposed dismissal was considered by a panel of the university's privilege and tenure committee, which found that two of the seven findings of misconduct did not constitute dismissible offences. three members recommended that the penalty