Item 1. Business
General-Union Carbide operates in two business segments of the chemicals and plastics industry, Specialties & Intermediates and Basic Chemicals & Polymers. Specialties & Intermediates converts basic and intermediate chemicals into a diverse portfolio of chemicals and polymers serving industrial customers in many markets. This segment also provides technology services, including licensing, to the oil and gas and petrochemicals industries. The Basic Chemicals & Polymers segment converts hydrocarbon feedstocks, principally liquefied petroleum gas and naphtha, into polyethylene, polypropylene, ethylene oxide and ethylene glycol for sale to third-party customers, as well as propylene, ethylene, ethylene oxide and ethylene glycol for consumption by the Specialties & Intermediates segment. The profitability of the Basic Chemicals & Polymers segment of the chemicals and plastics industry is highly cyclical, whereas that of the Specialties & Intermediates segment is less cyclical. Consequently, Union Carbide's results are subject to the swings of the business cycle in the Basic Chemicals & Polymers segment. See page 1, pages 6 through 8, and "Summary and Outlook" on pages 10 through 12 of the 1996 annual report to stockholders for further information about Union Carbide's businesses, and Note 5 on pages 30 through 31 of the 1996 annual report to stockholders for financial information about Union Carbide's business segments.
Union Carbide does not produce against a backlog of firm orders; production is geared primarily to the level of incoming orders and to projections of future demand. Inventories of finished products, work in process and raw materials are maintained to meet delivery requirements of customers and Union Carbide's production schedules.
At year-end 1996, 11,745 people were employed in manufacturing facilities, laboratories and offices around the world.
Raw Materials, Products and Markets-See information herein and in the 1996 annual report to stockholders on pages 6 through 8. Unless otherwise indicated, the products of Union Carbide are sold principally by its own sales force, directly to customers.
Union Carbide believes it has contracts or commitments for, or readily available sources of, hydrocarbon feedstocks and fuel supplies to meet its anticipated needs in all major product areas. The corporation's operations are dependent upon the availability of hydrocarbon feedstocks and fuels which are purchased from diverse domestic and international sources, including independent oil and gas producers as well as integrated oil companies.
The availability and price of hydrocarbon feedstocks, energy and finished products are subject to plant interruptions and outages and to market and political conditions in the U.S. and elsewhere. Operations and products at times may be adversely affected by legislation, government regulations, shortages, or international or domestic events.
The business segments of Union Carbide are not dependent to a significant extent upon a single customer or a few customers.
Patents; Trademarks; Research and Development-Union Carbide owns a large number of United States and foreign patents that relate to a wide variety of products and processes, has pending a substantial number of patent applications throughout the world, and is licensed under a number of patents. These patents expire at various times over the next 20 years. Such patents and patent applications in the aggregate are material to Union Carbide's competitive position. No one patent is considered to be material; however, the patent portfolio relating to the UNIPOL process technology is, in the aggregate, considered to be material. Union Carbide also has a large number of trademarks. The UNION CARBIDE, UCAR and UNIPOL trademarks are material; no other single trademark is material.
Part I (Cont.)
Essentially all of Union Carbide's research and development activities are company-sponsored. The principal research and development facilities of Union Carbide are indicated in the discussion of Properties (Item 2) of this Form 10-K report. In addition to the facilities specifically indicated there, product development and process technology laboratories are maintained at some plants. Union Carbide expensed $159 million in 1996, $144 million in 1995, and $136 million in 1994 on company-sponsored research activities to develop new products, processes, or services, or to improve existing ones.
Environment-See Costs Relating to Protection of the Environment on pages 14 through 15 of the 1996 annual report to stockholders and Note 15 on pages 39 through 40 thereof.
Insurance-Union Carbide's policy is to obtain public liability insurance coverage at terms and conditions and a price that management considers fair and reasonable. Union Carbide's management believes Union Carbide has public liability insurance in an amount sufficient to meet its current needs in light of pending, threatened, and future litigation and claims. There is no assurance, however, that Union Carbide will not incur losses beyond the limits, or outside the coverage, of its insurance. Such insurance is subject to substantial deductibles.
Competition-Each of the major product and service areas in which Union Carbide participates is highly competitive. In some instances competition comes from manufacturers of the same products as those produced by Union Carbide and in other cases from manufacturers of different products which may serve the same markets as those served by Union Carbide's products. Some of Union Carbide's competitors, such as companies principally engaged in petroleum operations, have more direct access to hydrocarbon feedstocks, and some have greater financial resources than Union Carbide.
The Specialties & Intermediates segment is characterized by differentiated products and is less subject to external changes in supply/demand relationships than the Basic Chemicals & Polymers segment. In this segment, competition is based primarily on product functionality and quality, with the more unique products commanding significant price premiums.
The Basic Chemicals & Polymers segment is characterized by large volume commodity products and is subject to external changes in supply/demand relationships, including changes in the strength of the overall economy, customer inventory levels, industry manufacturing capacity and operating rates and raw material feedstock costs. Participants in this segment compete for business primarily on the basis of price and efficient delivery systems.
See pages 6 through 8 of the 1996 annual report to stockholders for information about each segment's principal products, competitive position and major competitors.
Union Carbide is a major marketer of petrochemical products throughout the world. Products that the corporation markets are largely produced in the United States, while products marketed by the corporation's joint ventures are principally produced outside the United States. Competitive products are produced throughout the world.
Union Carbide's international operations face competition from local producers and global competitors and a number of risks inherent in carrying on business outside the United States, including risks of nationalization, expropriation, restrictive action by local governments and changes in currency exchange rates, in addition to the risks stated above.
Part I (Cont.)
Item 2.

Item 2. Properties
In management's opinion, current facilities, together with planned expansions, will provide adequate production capacity to meet Union Carbide's planned business activities. Capital expenditures are discussed on page 18 of the 1996 annual report to stockholders.
Listed below are the principal manufacturing facilities operated by Union Carbide worldwide. Research and engineering facilities are noted. Most of the domestic properties are owned in fee. Union Carbide maintains numerous domestic sales offices and warehouses, substantially all of which are leased premises under relatively short-term leases. All principal international manufacturing properties are owned or held under long-term leases. International administrative offices, technical service laboratories, sales offices and warehouses are owned in some instances and held under relatively short-term leases in other instances. The corporation's headquarters are located in Danbury, Connecticut, and are leased.
Principal domestic manufacturing facilities and the principal products manufactured there are as follows:
Location City Principal Product(s)
Specialties & Intermediates Segment California Torrance Latexes Georgia Tucker Latexes Illinois Alsip Latexes Louisiana Greensburg Hydroxyethyl cellulose derivatives Louisiana Taft Acrolein and derivatives, acrylic monomers, caprolactone, UV-cured coatings, cycloaliphatic epoxides, glycol ethers, ethyleneamines, oxo alcohols New Jersey Bound Brook Polyols, polyethylene compounding New Jersey Edison Lanolin derivatives New Jersey Somerset Latexes Puerto Rico Bayamon Latexes Texas Garland Latexes Texas Seadrift Ethanolamines, glycol ethers, surfactants, polyethylene compounding Texas Texas City Organic acids and esters, alcohols, surfactants, vinyl acetate, solution vinyl resins, heat transfer fluids Washington Washougal Crystals West Virginia Institute Caprolactone derivatives, polyethylene glycol, hydroxyethyl cellulose, polyethylene oxide, surfactants, ethylidene norbornene, glutaraldehyde, acetone and derivatives West Virginia South Charleston Alkyl alkanolamines, brake fluids, miscellaneous specialty products, polyalkylene glycols, surfactants, specialty ketones, polyvinyl acetate resins, heat transfer fluids
Basic Chemicals & Polymers Segment Louisiana Norco (Cypress Plant) Polypropylene Louisiana Taft Ethylene oxide and glycol, olefins Louisiana Taft (Star Plant) Polyethylene Texas Seadrift Ethylene oxide and glycol, olefins, polyethylene, polypropylene Texas Texas City Olefins
Part I (Cont.)
Research and development for the Specialties & Intermediates segment is carried on at technical centers in Bound Brook, Edison and Somerset, New Jersey; Tarrytown, New York; Cary, North Carolina; Houston and Texas City, Texas; and South Charleston, West Virginia. Research and development for the Basic Chemicals & Polymers segment is carried on at technical centers in Bound Brook and Somerset, New Jersey; Houston, Texas; and South Charleston, West Virginia. Process and design engineering for both segments is conducted at a technical center in South Charleston, West Virginia, in support of domestic and foreign projects.
Principal international manufacturing facilities and the principal products manufactured there are as follows:
Country City Principal Product(s)
Specialties & Intermediates Segment Belgium Vilvoorde Lanolin derivatives Belgium Zwijndrecht Hydroxyethyl cellulose Brazil Aratu Hydroxyethyl cellulose Brazil Cubatao Polyethylene compounding Brazil Cabo Vinyl acetate Ecuador Guayaquil Latex Indonesia Jakarta Latex Malaysia Seremban Latex People's Republic of China Guangdong Latex Philippines Batangas Latex Sri Lanka Colombo Latex Thailand Nonthaburi Latex United Arab Emirates Dubai Latex United Kingdom Wilton Glycol ethers, ethanolamines
Basic Chemicals & Polymers Segment Canada Boucherville Molded polyethylene products Canada Prentiss Ethylene glycol United Kingdom Wilton Ethylene oxide and glycol
Research and development for the Specialties & Intermediates segment is carried on at international facilities in Antwerp, Belgium; Cubatao, Brazil; Montreal East, Canada; Jurong, Singapore; Meyrin (Geneva), Switzerland; and Wilton, United Kingdom. Research and development for the Basic Chemicals & Polymers segment is carried on at international facilities in Montreal East, Canada.
Item 3.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings
See Note 15 of Notes to Financial Statements on pages 39 through 40 of the 1996 annual report to stockholders.
Item 4.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The corporation did not submit any matters to a stockholder vote during the last quarter of 1996.
Part II
Item 5.

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Market and dividend information for the corporation's common stock is contained on pages 20 and 21 of the 1996 annual report to stockholders. Information about the stock exchanges where the stock is traded in the United States is listed on page 43 of the 1996 annual report to stockholders. The declaration of dividends is a business decision made from time to time by the Board of Directors based on the corporation's earnings and financial condition and other factors the Board considers relevant.
The number of stockholders of record of the corporation's common stock is contained on page 1 of the 1996 annual report to stockholders.
Sales of Unregistered Securities - On December 17, 1996, the corporation issued 479 shares of Union Carbide Corporation common stock to a director under the 1992 Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Union Carbide Corporation. Since the plan does not provide for any payment or other voluntary contribution, the issuance of the shares of common stock does not involve a "sale" of a security within the meaning of Section 2(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and, thus, is exempt from the registration requirements of the act.
During 1996, put options were sold to institutional investors in a series of private placements exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, entitling the holders to sell 3,835,081 shares of Union Carbide Corporation common stock to the corporation, at prices ranging from $36.50 to $45.31 per share. Premiums received for the sales of the options totaled $4,907,913.
Item 6.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Information pertaining to consolidated operations is included under the captions "From the Income Statement," and "From the Balance Sheet", and dividend information is included under the caption "Other Data" in the Selected Financial Data on pages 20 through 21 of the 1996 annual report to stockholders.
Item 7.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
See the information covered in the 1996 annual report to stockholders on pages 10 through 19.
Item 8.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The consolidated balance sheet of Union Carbide Corporation and subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, together with the report thereon of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP dated January 17, 1997, are contained on pages 22 through 42 of the 1996 annual report to stockholders.
Quarterly income statement data is contained on page 21 of the 1996 annual report to stockholders.
Item 9.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Union Carbide has not had any disagreements covered by this item with KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, its independent auditors.
Part III
Item 10.

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
For background information on the Directors of Union Carbide Corporation whose terms are expected to continue after the annual meeting of stockholders and persons nominated to become Directors, see pages 7 through 10 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on April 23, 1997.
The principal executive officers of the corporation are as follows. Data is as of March 20, 1997.
Name Age Position Year First Elected
William H. Joyce 61 Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer 1993 Joseph S. Byck 55 Vice-President 1991 James F. Flynn 54 Vice-President 1993 Joseph E. Geoghan 59 Vice-President, General Counsel and Secretary 1987 Malcolm A. Kessinger 53 Vice- President 1991 Lee P. McMaster 54 Vice-President 1993 Joseph C. Soviero 58 Vice-President 1993 Roger B. Staub 62 Vice-President 1993 Ronald Van Mynen 59 Vice-President, Health, Safety and Environment 1992 John K. Wulff 48 Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller 1988
There are no family relationships between any officers or directors of the corporation. There is no arrangement or understanding between any officer and any other person pursuant to which the officer was elected an officer. An officer is elected by the Board of Directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is elected and qualified.
The table on the next page gives a summary of the positions held during at least the past five years by each officer. Each of the officers has been employed by the corporation or a subsidiary of the corporation for the past five years.
Part III (Cont.)
Name Position Years Held
William H. Joyce Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer 1996 to present President and Chief Executive Officer 1995 to 1995 President and Chief Operating Officer 1993 to 1995 President, Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Company Inc. 1993 to 1994 Executive Vice-President 1991 to 1993 Executive Vice-President, Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Company Inc. 1990 to 1993
Joseph S. Byck Vice-President 1991 to present Vice-President, Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Company Inc. 1991 to 1994
James F. Flynn Vice-President 1993 to present Vice-President, General Manager Solvents & Coatings Materials Division 1989 to 1993
Joseph E. Geoghan Vice-President, General Counsel and Secretary 1990 to present
Malcolm A. Kessinger Vice-President 1991 to present Vice-President, Human Resources, Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Company Inc. 1990 to 1994
Lee P. McMaster Vice-President 1993 to present President, Industrial Chemicals Division 1992 to 1993
Joseph C. Soviero Vice-President 1993 to present President, Specialty Chemicals Division 1983 to 1993
Roger B. Staub Vice-President 1993 to present President, Polyolefins Division 1990 to 1993
Ronald Van Mynen Vice-President, Health, Safety and Environment 1992 to present Vice-President, Health, Safety and Environmental Affairs, Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Company Inc. 1985 to 1994
John K. Wulff Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller 1996 to present Vice-President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer 1989 to 1996
See "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" on page 24 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on April 23, 1997.
Part III (Cont.)
Item 11.

Item 11. Executive Compensation
See pages 20 through 22 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on April 23, 1997.
Item 12.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
See pages 23 and 24 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on April 23, 1997.
Item 13.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
No reportable transactions in 1996.
Part IV
Item 14.

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1. The consolidated financial statements set forth on pages 22 through 41 and the Independent Auditors' Report set forth on page 42 of the 1996 annual report to stockholders are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2. The Report on Schedule of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP appears on page 10 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
3. The following schedule should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Schedules other than those listed have been omitted because they are not applicable.
Page in this Form 10-K Report
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (Schedule II), three years ended December 31, 1996 11
(b) The corporation's Form 8-K dated October 2, 1996 contained the legal opinion of Cahill Gordon & Reindel regarding the issuance of $200 million of 7.75 percent debentures maturing in 2096.
The corporation's Form 8-K dated December 3, 1996 reported an amendment to the corporation's existing By-laws and an amendment to the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement.
The corporation's Form 8-K dated January 20, 1997 contained the corporation's press release dated January 20, 1997.
The corporation's Form 8-K dated January 22, 1997 contained exhibits related to the corporation's Medium Term Notes Program.
(c) Exhibits-See Exhibit Index on pages 13 through 16 for exhibits filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Part IV (Cont.)
Report of Independent Auditors
The Board of Directors Union Carbide Corporation
Under date of January 17, 1997, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of Union Carbide Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, as contained on pages 22 through 41 in the 1996 annual report to stockholders. These consolidated financial statements and our report thereon are incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 1996. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the related financial statement schedule as listed in Item 14(a)3. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits.
In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Stamford, Conn. January 17, 1997
Part IV (Cont.)
Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Union Carbide Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Deductions Items determined to be uncollectible, Additions less recovery Balance at Charged to of amounts Balance at beginning costs and previously end of of period expenses written off period Millions of dollars, year ended December 31, 1996 Allowance for doubtful accounts $11 $1 $2 $10 Millions of dollars, year ended December 31, 1995 Allowance for doubtful accounts $11 $5 $5 $11 Millions of dollars, year ended December 31, 1994 Allowance for doubtful accounts $12 $2 $3 $11
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Union Carbide Corporation
March 20, 1997 /s/ John K. Wulff by: John K. Wulff Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the corporation and in the capacities indicated on March 20, 1997.
/s/William H. Joyce /s/John J. Creedon /s/Robert D. Kennedy William H. Joyce John J. Creedon Robert D. Kennedy Director, Chairman of the Director Director Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/Joseph E. Geoghan /s/C. Fred Fetterolf /s/Ronald L. Kuehn, Jr. Joseph E. Geoghan C. Fred Fetterolf Ronald L. Kuehn, Jr. Director, Vice-President, Director Director General Counsel and Secretary
/s/John K. Wulff /s/Thomas P. Gerrity /s/Rozanne L. Ridgway John K. Wulff Thomas P. Gerrity Rozanne L. Ridgway Vice-President, Chief Director Director Financial Officer and Controller
/s/Rainer E. Gut /s/James M. Ringler Rainer E. Gut James M. Ringler Director Director
/s/Vernon E. Jordan, Jr. /s/William S. Sneath Vernon E. Jordan, Jr. William S. Sneath Director Director
Exhibit Index
Exhibit No.
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation as filed May 2, 1994 (See Exhibit 3.1 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
3.2.1 By-Laws of the Corporation, amended as of December 3, 1996.
4.1 Indenture dated as of June 1, 1995, between the Corporation and The Chase Manhattan Bank (formerly Chemical Bank), Trustee (See Exhibit 4.1.2 to the Corporation's Form S-3 effective October 13, 1995, Reg. No. 33-60705).
4.2 The Corporation will furnish to the Commission upon request any other debt instrument referred to in item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K.
4.3.1 Rights Agreement, dated as of July 26, 1989, as amended and restated as of May 27, 1992, between the Corporation and Chemical Bank (successor to Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company), as Rights Agent (See Exhibit 4(a) of the Corporation's Form 8 filed June 1, 1992).
4.3.2 Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of December 3, 1996, between the Corporation and Chase Mellon Shareholder Services Inc. as Successor Rights Agent (See Exhibit 99.1 of the Corporation's Form 8-K dated December 3, 1996).
10.1 Indemnity Agreement dated as of July 25, 1986, between the Corporation and Robert D. Kennedy. The Indemnity Agreement filed with the Commission is substantially identical in all material respects, except as to the parties thereto and dates thereof, with Indemnity Agreements between the Corporation and each other person who is a director or officer of the Corporation (See Exhibit 10.2 of the Corporation's 1992 Form 10-K).
10.2.1 1984 Union Carbide Stock Option Plan.
10.2.2 Resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on January 22, 1986, with respect to the 1984 Union Carbide Stock Option Plan.
10.2.3 Resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on April 17, 1986, with respect to the 1984 Union Carbide Stock Option Plan.
10.2.4 Amendment to the 1984 Union Carbide Stock Option Plan effective June 1, 1989 (See Exhibit 10.13.4 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
10.3.1 1988 Union Carbide Long-Term Incentive Plan (See Exhibit 10.14.1 of the Corporation's 1993 Form 10-K).
10.3.2 Amendment to the 1988 Union Carbide Long-Term Incentive Plan effective June 1, 1989 (See Exhibit 10.14.2 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
Exhibit Index (Cont.)
Exhibit No.
10.3.3 Amendment to the 1988 Union Carbide Long-Term Incentive Plan effective August 1, 1989 (See Exhibit 10.14.3 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
10.3.4 Resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on February 26, 1992, with respect to stock options granted under the 1984 Union Carbide Stock Option Plan and the 1988 Union Carbide Long- Term Incentive Plan (See Exhibit 10.14.4 of the Corporation's 1992 Form 10-K).
10.3.5 Resolutions adopted by the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors of the Corporation on June 30, 1992, with respect to stock options granted under the 1984 Union Carbide Stock Option Plan and the 1988 Union Carbide Long-Term Incentive Plan (See Exhibit 10.14.5 of the Corporation's 1992 Form 10-K).
10.4.1 1983 Union Carbide Bonus Deferral Program.
10.4.2 Amendment to the 1983 Union Carbide Bonus Deferral Program effective January 1, 1992 (See Exhibit 10.15.2 of the Corporation's 1992 Form 10-K).
10.5.1 1984 Union Carbide Cash Bonus Deferral Program.
10.5.2 Amendment to the 1984 Union Carbide Cash Bonus Deferral Program effective January 1, 1986.
10.5.3 Amendment to the 1984 Union Carbide Cash Bonus Deferral Program effective January 1, 1992 (See Exhibit 10.16.3 of the Corporation's 1992 Form 10-K).
10.6.1 Equalization Benefit Plan for Participants of the Retirement Program Plan for Employees of Union Carbide Corporation and its Participating Subsidiary Companies.
10.6.2 Amendment to the Equalization Benefit Plan effective January 1, 1994 (See Exhibit 10.18.2 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
10.7.1 Supplemental Retirement Income Plan.
10.7.2 Amendment to the Supplemental Retirement Income Plan effective January 1, 1994 (See Exhibit 10.19.3 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
10.7.3 Amendment to the Supplemental Retirement Income Plan effective January 1, 1995 (See Exhibit 10.18.3 of the Corporation's 1995 Form 10-K).
10.8.1 1992 Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Union Carbide Corporation.
10.8.2 Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on June 30, 1992, with respect to the 1992 Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Union Carbide Corporation (See Exhibit 10.20.2 of the Corporation's 1992 Form 10-K).
10.9.1 Severance Compensation Agreement, dated July 21, 1992, between the Corporation and Ronald Van Mynen. The Severance Compensation Agreement filed with the Commission is substantially identical in all material aspects, except as to the parties thereto and dates thereof, with Agreements between the Corporation and other officers and employees of the Corporation (See Exhibit 10.21.1 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
10.9.2 Amendment of Severance Compensation Agreement, dated September 24, 1993, between the Corporation and Ronald Van Mynen. Identical amendments, except as to the parties thereto, were entered into between the Corporation and other officers and employees of the Corporation (See Exhibit 10.21.2 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
Exhibit Index (Cont.)
Exhibit No.
10.10 Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on November 30, 1988, with respect to an executive life insurance program for officers and certain other employees (See Exhibit 10.22 of the Corporation's 1993 Form 10-K).
10.11 1994 Union Carbide Variable Compensation Plan (See Exhibit 10.23.2 of the Corporation's 1993 Form 10-K).
10.12.1 Union Carbide Corporation Benefits Protection Trust (See Exhibit 10.24.1 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
10.12.2 Amendment to the Union Carbide Corporation Benefits Protection Trust effective October 23, 1991.
10.12.3 Amendment to the Union Carbide Corporation Benefits Protection Trust effective January 1, 1994 (See Exhibit 10.24.3 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
10.13 Resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on February 24, 1988, with respect to the purchase of annuities to cover liabilities of the Corporation under the Equalization Benefit Plan for Participants of the Retirement Program Plan for Employees of Union Carbide Corporation and its Participating Subsidiary Companies and the Supplemental Retirement Income Plan (See Exhibit 10.25 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
10.14 Resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on June 28, 1989, with respect to the purchase of annuities to cover liabilities of the Corporation under the Supplemental Retirement Income Plan (See Exhibit 10.26 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
10.15 Union Carbide Corporation Non-Employee Directors' Retirement Plan (See Exhibit 10.27 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
10.16 1994 Union Carbide Long-Term Incentive Plan (See Exhibit 10.28 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
10.17.1 Union Carbide Compensation Deferral Program effective January 1, 1995 (See Exhibit 10.28 of the Corporation's 1995 Form 10-K).
10.17.2 Amendment to Union Carbide Compensation Deferral Program effective January 1, 1995.
10.17.3 Amendment to Union Carbide Compensation Deferral Program effective December 31, 1996.
10.18 Excess Long-Term Disability Plan effective January 1, 1994 (See Exhibit 10.30 of the Corporation's 1994 Form 10-K).
10.19 1995 Union Carbide Performance Incentive Plan (See Appendix A of the Corporation's proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders held on April 26, 1995).
10.20.1 Completion Guarantee dated September 15, 1996 by the Corporation and its partner, Petrochemical Industries Company K.S.C., for the benefit of certain banks with respect to construction of a petrochemicals complex in Kuwait (See Exhibit 10.1 of the Corporation's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996).
10.20.2 Definitions Agreement dated September 15, 1996 among the Corporation and various parties relating to Exhibit 10.20.1 (See Exhibit 10.2 of the Corporation's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996).
11 Computation of Earnings per Share For The Five Years Ended December 31, 1996.
13 The Corporation's 1996 annual report to stockholders (such report, except for those portions which are expressly referred to in this Form 10-K, is furnished for the information of the Commission and is not deemed "filed'' as part of the Form 10-K).
Exhibit Index (Cont.)
Exhibit No.
21 Subsidiaries of the Corporation.
23 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP.
27 Financial Data Schedule
Wherever an exhibit listed above refers to another exhibit or document (e.g., "See Exhibit 6 of..."), that exhibit or document is incorporated herein by such reference.
A copy of any exhibit listed above may be obtained on written request to the Secretary's Department, Union Carbide Corporation, Section E-4, 39 Old Ridgebury Road, Danbury, CT 06817-0001. The charge for furnishing any exhibit is 25 cents per page plus mailing costs.


ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation ("TETCO" or the "Company"), a subsidiary of PanEnergy Corp ("PEC"), was incorporated in Delaware in 1947 and is primarily engaged in the interstate transportation and storage of natural gas.
On November 25, 1996, PEC, Duke Power Company ("Duke Power") and Duke Transaction Corporation announced a definitive merger agreement for a tax-free, stock-for-stock transaction. Under the agreement, each share of PEC common stock would be converted into 1.0444 common shares of Duke Power. The merger is conditioned upon, among other things, the approval of PEC and Duke Power shareholders, and approvals of appropriate state and federal regulatory agencies. The Company anticipates that the stockholder and regulatory approvals can be completed within 12 months. At closing, Duke Power will change its name to Duke Energy Corporation ("Duke Energy") and PEC will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Duke Energy. The merger will be accounted for under the pooling of interests method.
Information concerning components of consolidated operating revenues, including revenues attributable to transportation and storage of natural gas, for the years 1996, 1995 and 1994 is contained in the Consolidated Statement of Income on page, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Executive offices of TETCO are located at 5400 Westheimer Court, Houston, Texas 77056-5310, and the telephone number is (713) 627-5400.
Certain Terms
Certain terms used in the description of the Company's business are explained below.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"): The agency that regulates the transportation of natural gas in interstate commerce under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 (the "NGA") and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (the "NGPA"). FERC's jurisdiction includes rate-making, construction of facilities and authorization to provide service.
Firm Service: Transportation or storage of third-party gas, for which customers pay a charge to reserve pipeline or storage capacity.
Gathering Systems: Pipeline, processing and related facilities that access production and other sources of natural gas supplies for delivery to mainline transportation systems.
Interruptible Service: Transportation or storage of third-party gas provided by pipelines on a capacity-available, non-firm basis.
Local Distribution Company ("LDC"): A municipal or investor-owned utility that sells or transports gas to local commercial, industrial and residential consumers.
Order 636: The FERC pipeline service restructuring rule that guided the industry's transition to unbundled, open-access pipeline contract transportation and related services, creating a more market-responsive environment.
Reservation Charge: The amount paid by firm transportation or storage customers to reserve pipeline or storage capacity.
Transition Costs: Those costs incurred as a result of the pipelines' transition to unbundled services under Order 636. The disposition of natural gas contracts tied to the former merchant function comprises the majority of such costs.
Units of Measure:
BBtu/d: Billion British thermal units per day TBtu: Trillion British thermal units Bcf: Billion cubic feet Tcf: Trillion cubic feet
NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION
General
TETCO, together with Algonquin Gas Transmission Company ("Algonquin"), Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company ("PEPL") and Trunkline Gas Company ("Trunkline"), all subsidiaries of PEC, owns and operates one of the nation's largest gas transmission networks. This fully interconnected 22,000-mile system can receive natural gas from most major North American producing regions for delivery to markets in the Mid-Atlantic, New England and Midwest states. During 1996, PEC's interstate pipelines delivered 2,939 TBtu of natural gas, equal to approximately 12% of U.S. consumption.
Market and Supply Area Deliveries
As used herein, "market area" with respect to each pipeline refers to those portions of the pipeline that include primarily delivery points for natural gas leaving the pipeline, and "supply area" with respect to each pipeline refers to those portions of the pipeline that include primarily receipt points for gas entering the pipeline. Market-area deliveries represent volumes of gas delivered to the market area, while supply-area deliveries represent volumes of gas delivered to the supply area. Generally, rates for supply-area service have lower margins than rates for market-area service.
A substantial majority of the delivered volumes of the Company's interstate pipelines represents gas transported under long-term firm service agreements with LDC customers in the pipelines' market areas. Firm transportation services are also provided under contract to gas marketers, other pipelines and a variety of end-users. In addition, the pipelines offer interruptible transportation to customers on a short-term or seasonal basis. See "Regulation" and "Competition."
Set forth below is information concerning throughput volumes for TETCO for 1996, 1995 and 1994 (volumes in TBtu).
During 1996, total billings for transportation and storage services provided by TETCO to Public Service Electric and Gas Company ("Public") accounted for approximately 13% of the Company's consolidated revenues. Public was the only customer of the Company accounting for 10% or more of consolidated revenues in 1996.
Demand for gas transmission on the Company's interstate pipeline system is seasonal, with the highest throughput occurring during the colder periods in the first and fourth quarters -- the winter heating season.
TETCO's major customers are located in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and New York, and include LDCs serving the Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, Newark and New York City metropolitan areas. Total throughput increased 9% in 1996 on the TETCO system.
In June 1996, TETCO filed with FERC to construct and lease approximately 142 BBtu/d of firm transportation capacity to Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation ("Columbia") starting in 1997, with full volumes flowing in 1999 for 15 years. TETCO plans to construct 26 miles of 36-inch- and 24-inch-diameter pipeline and add compression in Pennsylvania for the project.
In another project, previously called WinterNet, TETCO will lease firm transportation capacity to CNG Transmission Corporation ("CNG") beginning in 1997 and reaching full volumes of 64 BBtu/d in the year 2000 under a 22-year agreement. TETCO filed with FERC in June 1996 to construct eight miles of 36-inch-diameter pipeline looping in Pennsylvania for the project.
The final phase of the Integrated Transportation Program ("ITP") was completed as planned in 1996. ITP utilizes transportation services on all four of PEC's interstate natural gas pipeline systems, with ultimate delivery by TETCO and Algonquin, and serves five Northeast customers.
TETCO and PEPL signed contracts to provide 50 BBtu/d of firm service to a new market, the greater Cincinnati area, starting in November 1996. The contracts with the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co call for firm transportation service by TETCO and firm transportation and storage service by PEPL. Also, Trunkline will provide interruptible transportation service.
Storage
TETCO provides firm and interruptible open-access storage services. Since the implementation of the Order 636 restructuring, storage is offered as a stand-alone unbundled service or as part of a no-notice bundled service. TETCO's storage services utilize two joint venture storage projects in Pennsylvania and one wholly-owned and operated storage field in Maryland. TETCO also leases storage capacity. TETCO's certificated working capacity in these three fields is 70 Bcf, and on December 31, 1996, the combined working gas in storage was 59 Bcf.
REGULATION
TETCO is a "natural gas company" under the NGA and NGPA and, as such, is subject to the jurisdiction of FERC.
The NGA grants to FERC authority over the construction and operation of pipeline and related facilities utilized in the transportation and sale of natural gas in interstate commerce, including the extension, enlargement or abandonment of such facilities. TETCO holds required certificates of public convenience and necessity issued by FERC, authorizing it to construct and operate the pipelines, facilities and properties now in operation for which certificates are required, and to transport and store natural gas in interstate commerce.
FERC also has authority to regulate rates and charges for natural gas transported in or stored for interstate commerce or sold by a natural gas company in interstate commerce for resale. TETCO files with FERC applications for changes in transportation and storage rates and charges. These changes are normally allowed to become effective after a suspension period, subject to refund, until such time as FERC authorizes the actual level of rates and charges.
TETCO operates as an open-access transporter of natural gas. In 1992, FERC issued Order 636, which requires open-access pipelines to provide firm and interruptible transportation services on an equal basis for all gas supplies, whether purchased from the pipeline or from another gas supplier. To implement this requirement, Order 636 provides, among other things, for mandatory unbundling of services that have historically been provided by pipelines into separate open-access transportation, sales and storage services.
Order 636 provided for the use of the straight fixed-variable rate design, which assigns return on equity, related taxes and other fixed costs to the reservation component of rates. In addition, Order 636 allows pipelines to recover eligible costs resulting from implementation of Order 636 ("transition costs"). On July 16, 1996, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld, in general, all aspects of Order 636 and remanded certain issues, including recovery of gas supply realignment costs, for further explanation. This decision is on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. On February 27, 1997, FERC issued an order reaffirming the right of interstate pipelines to recover 100% of gas supply realignment costs. In addition, this matter is substantially mitigated by TETCO's transition cost settlements.
On August 1, 1994, TETCO implemented a FERC-approved settlement that resolved regulatory issues related primarily to Order 636 transition costs and a number of other issues related to services prior to Order
636. TETCO's final and nonappealable settlement provides for the recovery of a significant portion of transition costs through volumetric and reservation charges through 2002 and beyond, if necessary. Pursuant to the settlement, TETCO will absorb a certain portion of the transition costs, the amount of which continues to be subject to change dependent upon natural gas prices and deliverability levels. The Company has established provisions to reflect the impact of the settlement.
Regulation of the importation and exportation of natural gas is vested in the Secretary of Energy, who has delegated various aspects of this jurisdiction to FERC and the Office of Fossil Fuels of the Department of Energy.
TETCO is subject to the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, which regulates gas pipeline safety requirements and to federal and state environmental legislation.
RATES AND REGULATORY PROCEEDINGS
When rate cases are pending final FERC approval, a portion of the revenues collected by TETCO is subject to possible refund. A summary of the status of significant regulatory matters involving TETCO is contained in Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.
COMPETITION
In the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast Markets, TETCO competes with other interstate and intrastate pipeline companies in the transportation and storage of natural gas. The principal elements of competition among pipelines are rates, terms of service, and flexibility and reliability of service. TETCO continues to offer selective discounting to maximize revenues from existing capacity.
TETCO competes directly with Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Iroquois Gas Transmission System, CNG and Columbia.
Natural gas competes with other forms of energy available to the Company's customers and end users, including electricity, coal and fuel oils. The primary competitive factor is price. Changes in the availability or price of natural gas and other forms of energy, the level of business activity, conservation, legislation and governmental regulations, the capability to convert to alternative fuels, and other factors, including weather, affect the demand for natural gas in the areas served by TETCO.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
For a discussion of environmental matters involving the Company, see Notes 9 and 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which are incorporated herein by reference. Except as set forth therein, compliance with Federal, State and local provisions which have been enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise protecting the environment, are not expected to have a material effect upon the capital expenditures, earnings or financial position of the Company.
GENERAL MATTERS
While the Company does engage in some research and development activities, no such activities conducted during the past three years have been material to the Company's business, nor have there been any material customer-sponsored research activities during that period relating to the Company's business activities.
TETCO is a member of and provides support to the Gas Research Institute ("GRI"), which plans and manages research and development efforts for the gas industry. The funds used to support GRI are derived from a surcharge on the pipelines' rates pursuant to FERC authorization. Payments amounted to approximately $6.7 million, $5.7 million and $8.3 million in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
Foreign operations and export sales are not material to the Company's business as a whole.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had approximately 1,100 employees.
ITEM 2.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
TETCO's gas transmission system extends approximately 1,700 miles from producing fields in the Gulf Coast region of Texas and Louisiana to Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and New York. It consists of two parallel systems, one consisting of three large-diameter parallel pipelines and the other consisting of from one to three large-diameter pipelines over its length. TETCO's system, including the gathering systems, has 73 compressor stations. The TETCO system connects with the PEPL and Trunkline systems through the Lebanon Lateral.
TETCO owns and operates two offshore Louisiana gas supply systems, which extend over 100 miles into the Gulf of Mexico and consist of 490 miles of pipeline.
For information concerning natural gas storage properties, see "Natural Gas Transmission -- Storage" under Item 1, which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 3.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For information concerning material legal proceedings, see Notes 3, 9 and 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which are incorporated herein by reference.
[MAP of PanEnergy Corp Showing Pipelines, Storage Facilities, Principal Supply Areas and Proposed Pipelines.]
PART II
ITEM 5.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
All of TETCO's outstanding common stock, $1.00 par value per share, is owned by PanEnergy. In December 1995, TETCO declared and paid a $355 million dividend on common stock in the form of a promissory note due PanEnergy bearing interest at prime rate. No dividends were declared in 1996.
ITEM 6.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Selected consolidated financial and operating data is presented on Page, which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 7.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following information is provided to facilitate increased understanding of the 1996 and 1995 consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of the Company, and should be read in conjunction therewith and with the information set forth under Item 1. Because all of the outstanding capital stock of TETCO is owned by PanEnergy, the following discussion has been prepared in accordance with the reduced disclosure format permitted by Form 10-K for issuers that are wholly-owned subsidiaries of reporting companies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
OPERATING ENVIRONMENT
TETCO continues to advance projects that provide expanded services to meet the specific needs of customers. In 1996, TETCO announced a project to construct and lease new firm capacity to a customer with new volumes flowing under a 15-year lease agreement. In another project, previously called WinterNet, TETCO will lease firm transportation capacity to another customer beginning in 1997, reaching full volumes in 2000 under a 22-year agreement. In addition, TETCO offers selective discounting to maximize revenues from existing capacity.
Order 636 Transition Costs. With implementation of FERC Order 636 and the unbundling of services, the Company is incurring certain costs related to the transition, primarily TETCO's gas purchase contract commitments. At December 31, 1996, TETCO's gross commitments under gas purchase contracts that do not contain market-sensitive pricing provisions were approximately $120 million, $55 million, $50 million and $15 million for the years 1997 through 2000, respectively, with no significant amounts thereafter. These estimates reflect significant assumptions regarding natural gas contract reserves and prices.
In 1994, TETCO refunded $84 million to customers pursuant to a FERC-approved settlement that resolved regulatory issues related primarily to Order 636 transition costs and a number of other issues related to services prior to Order 636. TETCO's final and nonappealable settlement provides for the recovery of a significant portion of transition costs through volumetric and reservation charges through 2002 and beyond, if necessary. Pursuant to the settlement, TETCO will absorb a certain portion of the transition costs, the amount of which continues to be subject to change dependent upon natural gas prices and contract reserve levels. In 1995, based upon producers' discoveries of additional natural gas reserves, the Company increased its estimated liabilities for transition costs by $125.8 million. Under the terms of the existing settlement, regulatory assets were increased by $85.8 million and the Company recognized a $40 million charge to operating expenses ($26 million after tax).
At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company had recorded $64.8 million and $249.8 million (1996), and $65 million and $310 million (1995), of current and long-term regulatory assets, respectively, representing transition costs incurred or estimated to be incurred that will be recovered. At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company had recorded estimated current and long-term liabilities related to Order 636 transition costs of $84.4 million and $121.9 million (1996), and $125 million and $165 million (1995), respectively.
As a result of the sale in 1996 of the right to collect certain Order 636 transition costs, above-market gas purchase contract payments by TETCO are expected to exceed transition cost collections from customers through 2000. Net cash receipts related to transition costs are expected to occur thereafter.
The Company believes the exposure associated with gas purchase contract commitments is substantially mitigated by transition cost recoveries pursuant to TETCO's settlement, Order 636 and other mechanisms, and that this issue will not have a material adverse effect on consolidated results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Company reported consolidated income of $129 million before an extraordinary item, and net income of $112.3 million in 1996 compared with consolidated net income of $126.2 million in 1995.
OPERATING INCOME AND EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST AND TAX ANALYSIS
Operating income for 1996 was $320.6 million, $26.5 million over 1995. Earnings before interest and tax increased $29.9 million in 1996 as compared with 1995. Revenues increased $39.2 million, or 4%, primarily due to a 9% increase in throughput, resulting from new pipeline expansion projects placed in service in late 1995, including the ITP and the Riverside project, and colder weather. This increase in revenues was partially offset by increased operating expenses in 1996, which included higher benefit costs and $2.3 million of severance expense. Operating expenses in 1995 included a $40 million charge for higher Order 636 transition cost estimates, as well as a $33 million benefit for lower-than-projected PCB (polychlorinated biphenyl) cleanup costs incurred.
INTEREST EXPENSE AND EXTRAORDINARY ITEM
Interest expense increased $27.9 million in 1996 compared with 1995. This increase reflects higher average debt balances outstanding, partially offset by lower average interest rates.
On October 1, 1996, TETCO redeemed its $150 million, 10% debentures due 2011 and its $100 million, 10 1/8% debentures also due 2011. TETCO recorded a non-cash extraordinary charge of $16.7 million (net of income tax of $10.3 million) related to the unamortized discount on this early retirement of debt.
INCOME TAX
The effective tax rates for 1996 and 1995 differed from the statutory federal income tax rates primarily because of the effects of state income taxes and amortization of goodwill.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Capital expenditures totaled $125.2 million in 1996, compared with $135.3 million in 1995. Market-expansion projects represented approximately 45% of 1996 total expenditures.
The Company currently expects to invest approximately $150 million in 1997 capital expenditures. The Company's expenditure plans include approximately 50% for market-expansion projects. Funding for 1997 capital expenditures is expected to be provided by cash from operations, periodic sales of customer accounts with limited recourse and/or collection of intercompany advances receivable. In addition, TETCO has an effective shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the issuance of $100 million of unsecured debt securities.
INTERCOMPANY FINANCING ACTIVITY
Net intercompany advances are carried as open accounts and are not segregated between current and non-current amounts. Effective January 1, 1995, intercompany advances do not bear interest. Increases and decreases in advances result from the movement of funds to provide for operations, capital expenditures and debt payments of PanEnergy and its subsidiaries. The collection of advances receivable is subject to the availability of funds to PanEnergy, whose major sources of internally-generated funds include dividends and advances from subsidiaries. Net advances receivable aggregated $909.2 million and $686.1 million at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
In December 1994, TETCO declared and paid a cash dividend on common stock of $180 million. In December 1995, TETCO declared and paid a $355 million dividend on common stock in the form of a promissory note due PanEnergy maturing on June 30, 1996 and bearing interest at prime. In 1996, the maturity date of TETCO's $355 million note payable-parent was extended to October 1, 2001. In addition, a $250 million note payable to PanEnergy was issued by TETCO in 1996, with a maturity date of October 1, 2006.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This report may contain certain forward-looking information regarding the Company, including projections, estimates, forecasts, plans and objectives. Although management believes that all such statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, no assurance can be given that the actual results will not differ materially from those contained in such forward-looking statements.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions, natural gas and liquids prices, competition from other pipelines and alternative fuels, weather conditions, state and federal regulation, legal and regulatory proceedings, the development of new markets, services and products, and the condition of the capital markets utilized by the Company.
ITEM 8.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Reference is made to "Index -- Financial Statements" under Item 14(a)(1).
See the consolidated quarterly financial data on page, which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART IV
ITEM 14.

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this report or incorporated herein by reference:
(1) The Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules of Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Subsidiaries are listed on the Index, page 11.
(2) Exhibits filed herewith are designated by an asterisk(*); all exhibits not so designated are incorporated herein by reference to a prior filing as indicated.
The total amount of securities of the Registrant or its subsidiaries authorized under any instrument with respect to long-term debt not filed as an Exhibit does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Registrant agrees, upon request of the Securities and Exchange Commission, to furnish copies of any or all of such instruments.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the fourth quarter of 1996.
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
---------------------
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
All Schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required or the information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of income, common stockholder's equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Houston, Texas January 16, 1997
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
ASSETS
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMMON STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES SUMMARY
The accounting policies are presented to assist the reader in evaluating the consolidated financial statements of Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation (TETCO) and its subsidiaries (the Company). TETCO is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PanEnergy Corp (PanEnergy). Certain amounts for prior years have been reclassified in the consolidated financial statements to conform to the current presentation.
The Company is involved in the interstate transportation and storage of natural gas. The interstate gas transmission and storage operations of TETCO are subject to the rules and regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). TETCO meets the criteria and, accordingly, follows the reporting and accounting requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation." Accordingly, certain net costs totaling $326 million have been deferred as regulatory assets for amounts recoverable from customers, including costs related to environmental matters, Order 636 transition, certain employee benefits and the early retirement of debt. TETCO regularly evaluates the continued applicability of SFAS No. 71, considering such factors as regulatory changes and the impact of competition.
Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TETCO and all subsidiaries. Significant intercompany items have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes transportation and storage revenues in the period service is provided. When rate cases are pending final FERC approval, a portion of the revenues collected by TETCO is subject to possible refund. The Company has established adequate reserves where required for such cases. See Note 3 for a summary of regulatory matters.
Gas Supply Costs. Provisions are made in the consolidated statement of income for all estimated probable future losses associated with gas supply contracts which were established prior to implementation of FERC Order 636. See Note 3 for a discussion of gas supply contracts and other costs related to the Order 636 transition.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. All liquid investments with maturities at date of purchase of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.
Inventory Valuation. Inventory, which consists of materials and supplies, is recorded using the average cost method.
Plant, Property and Equipment. Plant, property and equipment is stated at cost, which does not purport to represent replacement or realizable value. Assets, including goodwill, are grouped and evaluated for potential impairment based on the ability to identify separate cash flows generated therefrom.
At the time FERC-regulated properties are retired, the cost plus the cost of retirement, less salvage, is charged to accumulated depreciation and amortization. When entire FERC-regulated operating units are sold or non-regulated properties are retired or sold, the plant and related accumulated depreciation and amortization accounts are reduced and any gain or loss is credited or charged to income, unless otherwise required by FERC. Depreciation of plant, property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method. See Note 6.
Amortization of Goodwill. The Company amortizes goodwill relating to PanEnergy's purchase of Texas Eastern Corporation (TEC) and its subsidiaries in 1989 on a straight-line basis over 40 years. Accumulated amortization of goodwill at December 31, 1996 and 1995 was $83.6 million and $78.5 million, respectively. See Note 4.
Early Retirement of Debt. The Company defers certain costs and losses, as permitted by FERC, related to the early retirement of long-term debt and amortizes such amounts as they are recovered through rates. At December 31, 1996 and 1995, other deferred charges included $48.7 million and $39.4 million, respectively, of such costs. See Note 7.
Interest Cost Capitalization. The Company capitalizes interest on major projects during construction. The rates used by TETCO are calculated pursuant to FERC rules and include an allowance for equity funds.
Deferred Income Tax. The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income tax. Under this method, the effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period the rate change is enacted. See Note 4.
2. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
A summary of transactions with affiliates included in the consolidated statement of income follows:
During 1994, net intercompany advances bore interest at variable rates based on LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rates). Effective January 1, 1995, intercompany advances do not bear interest. Advances are carried as open accounts and are not segregated between current and non-current amounts. Increases and decreases in advances result from the movement of funds to provide for operations, capital expenditures and debt payments of PanEnergy and its subsidiaries. The collection of advances receivable is subject to the availability of funds to PanEnergy, whose major sources of internally-generated funds include dividends and advances from subsidiaries.
See also Notes 4, 7 and 11 for discussion of other specific transactions with affiliates.
3. FERC ORDER 636 AND TRANSITION COSTS
TETCO primarily provides transportation and storage services pursuant to FERC Order 636. Order 636 allows pipelines to recover eligible costs resulting from implementation of the order (transition costs). On July 16, 1996, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld, in general, all aspects of Order 636 and remanded certain issues, including recovery of gas supply realignment (GSR) costs, for further explanation. This decision is on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. On February 27, 1997, FERC issued an order reaffirming the right of interstate pipelines to recover 100% of GSR costs. In addition, this matter is substantially mitigated by TETCO's transition cost settlement.
In 1994, TETCO refunded $84 million to customers pursuant to a FERC-approved settlement that resolved regulatory issues related primarily to Order 636 transition costs and a number of other issues related to services prior to Order 636. TETCO's final and nonappealable settlement provides for the recovery of a significant portion of transition costs through volumetric and reservation charges through 2002 and beyond, if necessary. Pursuant to the settlement, TETCO will absorb a certain portion of the transition costs, the amount of which continues to be subject to change dependent upon natural gas prices and contract reserve levels. In 1995, based upon producers' discoveries of additional natural gas reserves, the Company increased its estimated liabilities for transition costs by $125.8 million. Under the terms of the existing settlement, regulatory assets were increased $85.8 million and the Company recognized a $40 million charge to operating expenses ($26 million after tax).
At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company had recorded $64.8 million and $249.8 million (1996), and $65 million and $310 million (1995), of current and long-term regulatory assets, respectively, representing transition costs incurred or estimated to be incurred that will be recovered. At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company had recorded estimated current and long-term liabilities related to Order 636 transition costs of $84.4 million and $121.9 million (1996), and $125 million and $165 million (1995), respectively.
The Company believes the exposure associated with gas purchase contract commitments is substantially mitigated by transition cost recoveries pursuant to TETCO's settlement, Order 636 and other mechanisms, and that this issue will not have a material adverse effect on consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In 1993, the U.S. Department of the Interior (the Department) announced its intention to seek additional royalties from gas producers as a result of payments received by such producers in connection with past take-or-pay settlements, and buyouts and buydowns of gas sales contracts with natural gas pipelines. TETCO, with respect to certain producer contract settlements, may be contractually required to reimburse or, in some instances, to indemnify producers against such royalty claims. The potential liability of the producers to the government and of TETCO to the producers involves complex issues of law and fact which are likely to take substantial time to resolve. On August 27, 1996, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia overturned a lower court ruling in favor of the government in litigation brought on behalf of producers. The Department's petition for rehearing was denied in November 1996. The Department may continue to seek further appellate review. If TETCO ultimately has to reimburse or indemnify the producers, TETCO will file with FERC to recover these costs from pipeline customers. The Company believes the resolution of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position.
4. INCOME TAX
The Company's taxable income is included in a consolidated federal income tax return with PanEnergy. Therefore, income tax has been provided in accordance with PanEnergy's tax allocation policy, which requires regulated subsidiaries to calculate federal income tax as if separate taxable income, as defined, was reported.
Income tax as presented in the consolidated statement of income is summarized as follows:
Total income tax differs from the amount computed by applying the federal income tax rate to income before income tax. The reasons for this difference are as follows:
The tax effects of temporary differences that resulted in deferred income tax assets and liabilities, and a description of the significant financial statement items that created these differences, are as follows:
In 1990, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued regulations which disallow for tax purposes losses incurred in PanEnergy's 1989 sales of certain assets that were acquired in the purchase of TEC. Consequently, PanEnergy established a provision in 1990 for this and certain other issues, resulting in increases in TETCO's goodwill and paid-in capital. Following further discussions with the IRS, PanEnergy revised its estimates in 1994 with respect to the disallowed loss issue, and in 1995 and 1996 with respect to the remaining issues. As a result, PanEnergy reduced its provision and TETCO's related goodwill and paid-in capital by approximately $7 million, $100 million and $200 million in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
5. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CREDIT RISK
Financial Instruments
- ---------------
(1) The fair value of these financial instruments, which are insurance contracts, is based on determinations by insurance companies. (2) Based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues, discounted cash flows and/or rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.
PanEnergy's four interstate natural gas pipelines have implemented an agreement to sell with limited recourse, on a continuing basis, current accounts receivable at a discount. At December 31, 1996, the Company had a $56 million liability recorded for collections by the Company of accounts receivable sold in December 1996. In 1996, TETCO received $98.6 million from the sale of the right to collect certain Order 636 transition costs, with limited recourse. At December 31, 1996, $87.3 million remained outstanding on the transition cost recovery rights sold. In the opinion of management, the probability that the Company will be required to perform under the recourse provisions is remote.
The recourse provisions of the trade accounts receivable and Order 636 transition cost recovery sales agreements have no book value associated with them and there are no fair values readily determinable since quoted market prices are not available. The fair values of advances receivable-parent are not readily determinable since such amounts are carried as non-interest bearing open accounts. See Note 2.
Significant Customers and Concentrations. Customer billings that exceeded 10% of consolidated revenues during the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 or 1994 were those to Public Service Electric and Gas Company totaling $119.6 million, $130.4 million and $112.3 million, respectively.
The Company's primary market area is located in the Northeast region of the United States. The Company has a concentration of receivables due from gas and electric utilities in this area, which may affect the Company's overall credit risk in that certain customers may be similarly affected by changes in economic, regulatory or other factors. Trade receivables are generally not collateralized; however, the Company analyzes customers' credit positions, establishes credit limits and monitors the appropriateness of those limits on an ongoing basis.
6. PLANT, PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
A summary of plant, property and equipment by classification follows:
7. DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
A summary of long-term debt follows:
The interest rates indicated were in effect on principal balances outstanding at December 31, 1996. Interest costs capitalized in 1996, 1995 and 1994 were $0.7 million, $1.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively.
Required sinking fund and installment payments applicable to long-term debt for the years 1999 through 2001 are $49 million, $200 million and $471 million, respectively. There are no required payments due in 1997 or 1998.
In December 1995, TETCO declared and paid a $355 million dividend on common stock in the form of a promissory note due PanEnergy. This promissory note bears interest at prime and was to mature on June 30, 1996. In 1996, the maturity date of the note was extended to October 1, 2001.
On October 1, 1996, TETCO redeemed its $150 million, 10% debentures due 2011 and its $100 million, 10 1/8% debentures also due 2011. TETCO recorded a non-cash extraordinary charge of $16.7 million (net of income tax of $10.3 million) related to the unamortized discount on this early retirement of debt.
TETCO has an effective shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the issuance of $100 million of unsecured debt securities.
8. LEASES
The Company utilizes assets under operating leases in several areas of operations. Consolidated rental expense for these leases and for lease expenses billed from affiliates amounted to $11 million in 1996,
$10.5 million in 1995 and $10 million in 1994. Minimum rental payments under the Company's various operating leases for the years 1997 through 2001 are $3.2 million, $2.8 million, $2.5 million, $1.8 million and $0.5 million, respectively. Thereafter, payments aggregate $0.9 million through 2004.
9. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
TETCO is currently conducting PCB (polychlorinated biphenyl) assessment and cleanup programs at certain of its compressor station sites under conditions stipulated by a U.S. Consent Decree. The programs include on- and off-site assessment, installation of on-site source control equipment and groundwater monitoring wells, and on- and off-site cleanup work. TETCO expects to complete these cleanup programs during 1997. Groundwater monitoring activities will continue beyond 1997.
In 1987, the Commonwealth of Kentucky instituted suit in state court against TETCO, alleging improper disposal of PCBs at TETCO's three compressor station sites in Kentucky. This suit, which is still pending, seeks penalties for violations of Kentucky environmental statutes. The Company previously established a reserve for potential fines and penalties. In 1996, TETCO completed cleanup of these sites.
At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company had current and long-term liabilities recorded of $26.1 million and $136.6 million (1996), and $44.9 million and $168.3 million (1995), respectively, for remaining estimated cleanup costs. These amounts represent an estimate of probable gross cleanup costs to be incurred by TETCO, have not been discounted or reduced by customer recoveries and do not include fines, penalties or third-party claims. Estimated liabilities for remaining TETCO PCB cleanup costs were reduced $77.6 million in the fourth quarter 1995 as a result of lower-than-projected cleanup costs incurred on completed sites. As a result of the reduction in estimated cleanup costs, TETCO's share of the cleanup estimate was lowered, which decreased operating expenses $33 million ($21.5 million after tax) and reduced related regulatory assets by $44.6 million. At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company had current and long-term regulatory assets recorded of $10.8 million and $90.4 million (1996), and $17 million and $101.7 million (1995), respectively, representing costs to be recovered from customers.
The federal and state cleanup programs are not expected to interrupt or diminish TETCO's ability to deliver natural gas to customers. The Company believes the resolution of matters relating to the environmental issues discussed above will not have a material adverse effect on consolidated results of operations or financial position due to customer settlements and past experience with environmental cleanup costs.
10. LITIGATION
Edison. In connection with a rupture and fire that occurred on TETCO's 36-inch natural gas pipeline on March 23, 1994 in Edison, New Jersey, claims have been made and numerous lawsuits have been filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County against TETCO and other private and governmental entities by or on behalf of hundreds of individuals and businesses. These claimants seek compensatory damages for personal injuries, property losses and/or lost business income, as well as punitive damages. The property insurers of an apartment complex adjacent to the asphalt plant where the rupture occurred also filed suits against TETCO and other defendants in Superior Court seeking to recover amounts paid under pertinent policies of insurance. Quality Materials, Inc. (Quality), the owner of the asphalt plant, filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against TETCO seeking to recover unspecified property damages, lost income and punitive damages. TETCO has filed a counterclaim against Quality and has settled the claims of the property insurers and some individuals and businesses, while retaining the right to seek recovery of those settlement amounts from other defendants. In April 1996, the U.S. District Court dismissed the suit by Quality and the counterclaim by TETCO on the grounds that all claims should be resolved in the pending Middlesex County litigation.
The findings of an investigation of the incident by the National Transportation Safety Board indicate third-party damage to be the cause of the rupture. The Company recorded a provision in 1994 for costs related to this incident that are not recoverable under the Company's insurance policies.
PCBs. On August 30, 1995, two plaintiffs filed a lawsuit with class action allegations in Jefferson County, Texas, against PanEnergy, TETCO and TEC, among others. While that suit ultimately was dismissed, one of the two original plaintiffs refiled the suit on June 3, 1996 in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri. The defendants removed the suit to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division in July 1996. In March 1997, the case was remanded to the same state court in St. Louis. The plaintiff seeks recovery of compensatory and punitive damages, in unspecified amounts, for personal injuries and property damage resulting from alleged exposure to PCBs.
The Company believes the resolution of the legal matters discussed above will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial position.
Marathon/Amerada Hess. On December 16, 1996, TETCO received notification that Marathon Oil Company (Marathon) intended to commence substitution of other gas reserves, deliverability and leases for those dedicated to a certain natural gas purchase contract (the Marathon Contract) with TETCO. In TETCO's view, the tendered substitute gas reserves, deliverability and leases are not subject to the Marathon Contract and TETCO filed a declaratory judgment action on December 17, 1996 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana seeking a ruling that Marathon's interpretation of the Marathon Contract is incorrect. On January 7, 1997, Marathon filed an answer and a counterclaim to TETCO's complaint seeking a declaratory judgment enforcing its interpretation of the Marathon Contract. On February 18, 1997, Amerada Hess Corporation (Amerada Hess) notified TETCO that it intended to commence substitution of other gas reserves, deliverability, and leases for those dedicated to its natural gas purchase contract (the Amerada Hess Contract) with TETCO. On the same date, Amerada Hess also filed a petition in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, 157th Judicial District, seeking a declaratory judgment that its interpretation of the Amerada Hess Contract, which covers the same leases and reserves as the Marathon Contract, is correct. TETCO now has removed that suit to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. TETCO also filed a declaratory judgment action with respect to Amerada Hess contentions in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana on February 21, 1997. The Louisiana action now has been transferred to the judge presiding over the Marathon Contract matter. The potential liability of the Company should TETCO be contractually obligated to purchase natural gas based upon the substitute gas reserves, deliverability and leases, and the effect of transition cost recoveries pursuant to TETCO's Order 636 settlement involve numerous complex legal and factual matters which will take a substantial period of time to resolve. Because these matters are in the early stages of litigation, the Company cannot estimate the effects of these issues, based on information currently available.
Grynberg. A lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia by natural gas producer Jack Grynberg was served in July 1996 naming TETCO and certain affiliated companies as defendants, among others. The action was brought under the federal False Claims Act against 70 defendants, including every major pipeline, asserting that the defendants intentionally underreported volumes and heating content of gas purchased from producers on federal and Indian lands, with the result that the United States was underpaid royalties. The plaintiff seeks recovery of the royalty amounts due the United States, treble damages and civil penalties. Because this matter is in the early stages of litigation, the Company cannot estimate the effects of this issue, based on information currently available.
The Company is also involved in various other legal actions and claims arising in the normal course of business. Based upon its current assessment of the facts and the law, management does not believe that the outcome of any such action or claim will have a material adverse effect upon the consolidated results of operations or financial position of the Company. However, these actions and claims in the aggregate seek substantial damages against the Company and are subject to the uncertainties inherent in any litigation. The Company is defending itself vigorously in all the above suits.
11. PENSION AND OTHER BENEFITS
Pension Benefits. PanEnergy has, and the Company participates in, a non-contributory trusteed pension plan covering eligible employees with a minimum of one year vesting service. The plan provides pension benefits for eligible employees of TETCO that are generally based on an employee's years of benefit accrual
service and highest average eligible earnings. PanEnergy's policy is to fund amounts, as necessary, on an actuarial basis to provide assets sufficient to meet benefits to be paid to plan members.
The components of the Company's net pension benefit, allocated by PanEnergy, are as follows:
Assumptions used in the Company's pension and other postretirement benefits accounting are as follows:
PanEnergy also sponsors, and the Company participates in, an employee savings plan which covers substantially all employees. The Company expensed plan contributions of $3.7 million in 1996 and $3.6 million in both 1995 and 1994.
Other Postretirement Benefits. The Company's postretirement benefits, in conjunction with PanEnergy, consist of certain health care and life insurance benefits. Substantially all of TETCO's employees may become eligible for these benefits when they reach retirement age while working for the Company and have attained 10 years of specified service. The benefits are provided through contributory and noncontributory trusteed benefit plans.
The Company accrues such benefit costs over the active service period of employees to the date of full eligibility for the benefits. The net unrecognized transition obligation, resulting from implementation of accrual accounting in 1993, is being amortized over approximately 20 years.
It is the Company's and PanEnergy's general policy to fund accrued postretirement health care costs. PanEnergy's retiree life insurance plan is fully funded based on actuarially-determined requirements. FERC policy generally allows, subject to individual pipeline proceedings, for current rate recovery of funded accrued postretirement benefit costs including amortization of the transition obligation. Pending FERC approval in rate proceedings, TETCO has deferred certain postretirement benefit costs.
The components of the Company's net postretirement benefits cost, allocated by PanEnergy, are as follows:
The assumed health care cost trend rate used to estimate postretirement benefits was 7% for 1997. The health care cost trend rate is expected to decrease, with a 5.5% ultimate trend rate expected to be achieved by 1999. The effect of a 1% increase in the assumed health care cost trend rate for each future year is $0.3 million on the annual aggregate postretirement benefit cost and $4.8 million on PanEnergy's accumulated postretirement benefit obligation attributable to the Company at December 31, 1996.
Other Postemployment Benefits. The Company accrues such benefit costs provided by the Company to certain former or inactive employees. TETCO has received permission from FERC to defer such costs, pending approval in rate proceedings.
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
Certain amounts for the prior year have been reclassified to conform to the current reporting presentation. - ---------------
(1) Resulting from the early retirement of debt.
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUMMARY OF SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
Certain amounts for the prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current reporting presentation.
(1) Includes a $100 million charge ($60.2 million after tax) reflecting TETCO's settlement of Order 636 implementation and other issues. (2) Includes an extraordinary charge of $16.7 million (net of income tax of $10.3 million) resulting from the early retirement of debt. (3) Trillion British thermal units.
See the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of material contingencies
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
By /s/ ROBERT W. REED ---------------------------------------- (Robert W. Reed, Secretary)
Date: March 26, 1997
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 26, 1997.
EXHIBIT INDEX