Item 1. Business
In 1996, Cafeteria Operators, L.P. (the "Company"), and its parent and Managing General Partner Furr's/Bishop's, Incorporated (the "Parent"), continued to streamline its operating focus after completing a major restructuring of its financial position in fiscal 1995. On January 2, 1996, the Parent received the approval of its lenders and shareholders on a recapitalization resulting in a reduction of the Parent's debt and other obligations by over $200 million, a significant reduction in interest expense and an increase in net worth. Approval of the restructuring concluded nearly three years of discussions aimed at providing the Parent with greater financial stability and the resources to compete in an increasingly competitive industry.
Recent Events
The Parent and the Company recently completed a comprehensive restructuring of their financial obligations (the "Restructuring"). As part of the Restructuring, the Company executed the Amended and Restated Indenture (the "Indenture") dated as of November 15, 1995 between the Company and Fleet National Bank of Massachusetts (f/k/a Shawmut Bank, N.A.), as trustee (the "Trustee"), pursuant to which, among other things, the terms of $40.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Company's 11% Senior Secured Notes due June 30, 1998 (the "11% Notes") issued pursuant to the Indenture dated as of March 27, 1992 between the Company and Shawmut Bank, N.A., as collateral agent (the "Old Indenture"), were amended, with the consent of holders of the 11% Notes at such time (the "Original 11% Noteholders"), to constitute $40.0 million (subject to the issuance of additional Notes in payment of the first interest installment) aggregate principal amount of Notes issued pursuant to the Indenture. In addition, the Company issued a Note in the original principal amount of $1.7 million to the Trustees of General Electric Pension Trust ("GEPT") in settlement of a $5.4 million (plus interest) judgment against one of its limited partners, Furr's/Bishop's Cafeterias, L.P.
As a result of the Restructuring, indebtedness of the Company in the amount of approximately $153 million aggregate principal amounts (plus approximately $46.6 million in accrued and unpaid interest) outstanding under the Old Indenture was exchanged on January 2, 1996 by holders of the 11% Notes (the "Exchanging 11% Noteholders" and together with the Original 11% Noteholders, the "former 11% Noteholders") for an aggregate of 95% of the limited partnership interests of the Company and the right to put such limited partnership interests to the Parent in exchange for 95% of its outstanding Common Stock (the "Put Option"). In addition, outstanding warrants to purchase Common Stock held by certain of the Exchanging 11% Noteholders were canceled.
On March 12, 1996, a majority of the Exchanging 11% Noteholders exercised the Put Option and, accordingly, all Exchanging 11% Noteholders put their limited partnership interests to the Parent in exchange for 95% of its outstanding Common Stock. As of the date of this Form 10K, the Exchanging 11% Noteholders no longer own any limited partnership interests of the Company; however, they and their successors and assigns own an aggregate of 95.0% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Parent.
General
The Company was formed in 1987 and is one of the largest operators of family-style cafeteria restaurants in the United States. The Company believes that its cafeterias and buffet, which are operated under the "Furr's" and
"Bishop's" names, are well recognized in their regional markets for their value, convenience, food quality and friendly service. The Company's 108 cafeterias and one buffet are located in twelve states in the Southwest, West and Midwest. The Company also operates two specialty restaurants in Lubbock, Texas under the name Zoo-Kini's Soups, Salads and Grill. In addition, the Company operates Dynamic Foods, its food preparation, processing and distribution division in Lubbock, Texas. Dynamic Foods provides in excess of 85% of the food and supply requirements of the Company's cafeteria and buffet restaurants. Dynamic Foods also sells pre-cut produce, bakery items and various prepared foods to the restaurant, food service and retail markets.
Family Dining Division
The Family Dining Division consists of the Company's 108 cafeterias and one pay-at-the-door buffet-style restaurant.
Cafeterias. Cafeterias occupy a long standing niche in the food service industry, providing the customer with a pleasant, moderately-priced alternative to fast-food chains and conventional full-service restaurants. The Company's cafeterias offer a wide variety of meals appealing to a broad range of personal tastes, including chicken, beef, fish and pasta entrees; soup, salad and vegetable choices; non-alcoholic beverages; and freshly baked pies and cakes. The food is prepared for serving by the individual cafeteria. The Company's cafeterias are generally characterized by quick service and modest prices per guest. Guest tickets for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1996 and January 2, 1996 averaged approximately $5.37 and $5.14, respectively. The Company's cafeterias average approximately 10,000 square feet in size and have average seating capacity for approximately 300 guests. Virtually all of the Company's cafeterias feature "All-You-Can-Eat" at a fixed price all day, every day, as well as the traditional "a la carte" pricing alternative.
Management believes that the "Furr's" and "Bishop's" names are widely recognized in their regional markets. Management's emphasis on consistent food quality, variety, cleanliness and service has led to a loyal guest base. The Company's customer base consists principally of people over 45 years of age, shoppers, working people and young families.
The Company considers its cafeteria business to be a relatively mature business, but believes that earnings growth can be achieved through successful implementation of its cost control, remodeling, marketing and growth strategies.
Virtually all cafeterias offer the choice of "All-You-Can-Eat" and "a la carte" pricing options. As a result, customers choose the pricing and dining format which they find most attractive. The Company's goal is to be the value leader in its segment.
Buffet. The Company's buffet-style restaurant features traditional American and ethnic foods at a fixed price that entitles each guest to unlimited servings of all menu items and beverages. Food items are served in a "scatter bar" format at buffet islands centrally located in the restaurant's food service area. The "scatter-bar" buffet format emphasizes customer choice by allowing customers to select at their own pace in self selected portions, thereby improving the restaurant experience for the guest. The buffet unit is approximately 10,000 square feet in size and has seating capacity for approximately 300 guests. Guest tickets for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 averaged approximately $5.64.
Zoo-Kini's Soups, Salads and Grill
The Company's two Zoo-Kini's Soups, Salads and Grill restaurants are located in Lubbock, Texas. The concept has appealed to younger age groups than the cafeterias and is particularly well-liked by high school and college students, as well as baby boomers. Zoo-Kini's Soups, Salads and Grill restaurants are known for an extensive Soup, Salad and Potato Bar, as well as a selection of healthy grilled items and specialty foods. Zoo-Kini's Soups, Salads and Grill restaurants offer full table service and serve several varieties of wine and beer. There is no bar area in either restaurant, but an outdoor patio area at one location with seating for 55 serves as a bar during the warmer months.
Zoo-Kini's Soups, Salads and Grill restaurants are known for the signature neon animals in their windows and a large interior mural emphasizing wildlife themes. Zoo-Kini's Soups, Salads and Grill restaurants are currently approximately 4,700 square feet in size and have seating capacity for 135-200 guests. Guest tickets for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 averaged approximately $6.07.
Marketing and Advertising
The Company's marketing program utilizes a variety of media to attract customers to the Company's restaurants and to create a targeted image for the Company's restaurants. First, the Company utilizes point of sale advertising within its restaurants, to focus customers on the various food items and promotions being offered at the restaurant. Billboard advertising, newspaper and direct mail programs within the communities in which the Company has a large presence are used to direct customers to the Company's restaurants and to promote specific programs, including the one-price "All-You-Can-Eat" concept. Radio and television advertisements are also used by the Company to enhance its image with respect to food quality and value pricing and to support and introduce new concepts or programs at its restaurants. The Company frequently uses all of its marketing tools together to introduce or promote one concept or program. In addition, store managers and other personnel are encouraged to participate in local public relations and promotional efforts.
Dynamic Foods
The Company operates Dynamic Foods, a food preparation, processing and distribution facility in Lubbock, Texas which supplies in excess of 85% of the food and supply requirements of the Company's family dining restaurants, providing the Company with uniform quality control and the ability to make volume purchases. In addition, management believes that there is significant potential for utilizing the available excess capacity at Dynamic Foods by increasing sales to third parties.
Dynamic Foods prepares and processes approximately 150 separate food items, including over 20 salad and other fresh vegetable offerings under the "Dynamic Foods" and "Furr's Carry Out Kitchen" labels. Currently, approximately 90% of Dynamic Food's manufacturing output is used at the Company's restaurants and the remainder is sold to third parties.
In 1993, Dynamic Foods commenced third party sales of pre-cut produce, meats and seafood, bakery goods and other prepared foods and entrees. In fiscal 1996, third party sales by Dynamic Foods aggregated $2.9 million.
Restaurant Management
The success of each restaurant's operation is largely dependent upon the quality of in-store management and mid-level supervisory management. Experienced and well trained in-store management is important to assure good service, quality food and the cleanliness of each restaurant, to control costs, and to monitor local eating habits and traffic.
Each cafeteria and buffet is operated under the supervision of a general manager, a food and beverage manager and one or two associate managers. Each cafeteria generally employs between 40 and 70 workers of whom approximately 20% are part-time workers. The buffet-style restaurant typically employs fewer persons as the "scatter-bar" concept reduces service staffing requirements.
The general managers of the Company's family dining restaurants report to thirteen regional managers who, in turn, report to the Vice President of Field Operations. The general managers have responsibility for day-to-day operations, including food ordering, labor scheduling, menu planning, customer relations and personnel hiring and supervision. The regional managers visit each restaurant regularly and work with the in-store managers to evaluate and maintain overall operating standards. They also make quality control checks, train personnel in operating procedures and evaluate procedures developed by cafeteria and buffet personnel for possible use in all Company owned family dining units.
The management team for a Zoo-Kini's Soups, Salads & Grill restaurant consists of one general manager and two or three assistant managers. Each specialty restaurant employs a high proportion of part-time hourly employees, most of whom work for an average hourly wage significantly less than employees earn at cafeterias and buffets, due to the larger possible tip income at the restaurants. Working in concert with the general managers, the Company's senior management defines operational and performance objectives for each specialty restaurant.
Service Marks and Trademarks
The Company utilizes and is dependent upon certain registered service marks, including "Furr's Cafeterias", "Bishop Buffets" and "Dynamic Foods", and a stylized "F" trademarked by Furr's. The Company has applied for trademark registration for its Zoo-Kini's Soups, Salads and Grill restaurants. Other trademarks are current and are renewable on dates ranging from December 1997 to February 2008. The Company is not aware of any party who could prevail in a contest of the validity of such service marks and trademarks. In October 1994, the Company licensed the use of its "El Paso Bar-B-Que Company" and related trademarks to M&B Restaurants, L.C. under a License and Development Agreement. This agreement was terminated in September 1996 and the related trademarks were sold.
Seasonality
Customer volume on a Company-wide basis at most established restaurants is generally somewhat lower in the winter months, due primarily to weather conditions in certain of the markets for the Company's restaurants. As a consequence, the first and fourth quarters of the year historically produce lower sales and results of operations. A harsh winter season has a negative effect on the Company's revenues, results of operations and liquidity.
Working Capital Requirements
The Company's restaurants are a cash business. Funds available from cash sales are not needed to finance receivables and are generally not needed immediately to pay for food, supplies and certain other expenses of the restaurants. Therefore, the business and operations of the Company have not historically required proportionately large amounts of working capital, which is generally common among similar restaurant companies. Should Dynamic Foods expand its sales to third parties, the accounts receivables and inventory related to such sales could require it to maintain additional working capital. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Liquidity and Capital Resources."
Competition
The food service business is highly competitive in each of the markets in which the Company's restaurants operate and is often affected by changes in consumer tastes, economic conditions and demographic and local traffic patterns. In each area in which the Company's restaurants operate, there is a large number of other food service outlets including other cafeterias, buffets and fast-food and limited-menu restaurants which compete directly and vigorously with the Company's restaurants in all aspects, including quality and variety of food, price, customer service, location and the quality of the overall dining experience.
Neither the Company nor any of its competitors has a significant share of the total food service market in any area in which the Company competes. The Company believes that its principal competitors are other cafeterias and buffets; moderately-priced, conventional restaurants, fast-food outlets, and eat-at-home alternatives. Many of the Company's competitors, including its primary cafeteria and buffet competitors, have greater financial resources and lower total debt-to-equity ratios than does the Company. The Company competes with other food service outlets for management personnel based on salary, opportunity for advancement and stability of employment. The Company believes it offers existing and prospective management personnel an attractive compensation and benefits package with opportunity for advancement in a stable segment of the food service industry.
The food manufacturing and distribution business is highly competitive and many of Dynamic Foods' competitors are large regional or national food processors and distributors with significantly greater financial resources than the Company. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that Dynamic Foods will be able to generate significantly higher revenue or increase the profitability of the Company.
Capital Expenditure Program
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 1996, January 2, 1996 and January 3, 1995, the Company expended $10.1 million, $8.0 million and $5.7 million, respectively, principally to maintain and remodel existing cafeterias, upgrade its computer and information systems, construct one new unit and improve the facility operated by Dynamic Foods. The Company believes that the aggregate level of capital expenditures over such period has been below that required to expand the Company's cafeteria operations and to remodel existing cafeterias as required by competitive conditions in the restaurant industry. The Company's capital expenditure program is necessary to enable the Company and its subsidiaries to increase their revenue and profitability.
Subject to its ability to generate necessary funds from operations or to obtain funds from other sources, the Company intends to pursue a program of remodeling existing restaurants and opening new restaurants. The Company anticipates expending approximately $5 to $7 million in fiscal year 1997 to open new restaurants, remodel existing cafeterias and make other capital expenditures. No assurance can be given that the Company will generate sufficient funds from operations or obtain alternative financing to enable it to make the desired capital expenditures. The Company's ability to open new restaurants will also depend, among other things, upon its ability to secure appropriate store locations on favorable terms and to identify, hire and train personnel for expansion. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Liquidity and Capital Resources."
Employees
As of March 4, 1997, the Company employed approximately 6,000 persons, of whom approximately 4,700 were employed on a full-time basis. The Company employed approximately 375 persons as managers or assistant managers of its restaurants, thirteen persons as regional managers and approximately 80 persons in executive, administrative or clerical positions in the corporate office. None of the Company's employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. The Company believes that its relations with its employees are satisfactory.
The majority of the Company's restaurants pay average wages in excess of the current minimum wage standards. However, the previously approved increase, to be effective in September 1997, and any future increase in the federal minimum wage could have the effect of increasing the Company's labor costs. In recent years, the market for those employees who have traditionally been employed in the restaurant industry has become increasingly competitive due to fewer persons entering this category of wage earner and the increased government regulation of immigrants entering and working in the United States. In response to this decrease in the available labor pool, the Company has increased its average hourly wage and expanded its hiring and training efforts.
Regulation
The Company's restaurants are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws affecting health, sanitation, waste water, fire and safety standards, as well as to state and local licensing regulating the sale of alcoholic beverages.
The Federal Americans With Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in public accommodations and employment. Such Act became effective as to public accommodations and employment in 1992. The Company could be required to expend funds to modify its restaurants in order to provide service to, or make reasonable accommodations for the employment of, disabled persons, as it proceeds with remodeling existing restaurants.
The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations governing its operations.
Item 2.

Item 2. Properties
Restaurant Locations. The following table sets forth the number of restaurants that the Company operates in certain states as of February 28, 1997.
Site Selection. The Company generally intends to open new restaurants or reposition existing restaurants in markets in which the Company's restaurants are presently located and in adjacent markets, in order to improve the Company's competitive position and increase operating margins by obtaining economies of scale in merchandising, advertising, distribution, purchasing and supervision. The primary criteria considered by the Company in selecting new locations are a high level of customer traffic, convenience to both lunch and dinner customers in demographic groups that tend to favor the Company's restaurants, and the occupancy cost of the proposed restaurant. The ability of the Company to open new restaurants depends on a number of factors, including its ability to find suitable locations and negotiate acceptable leases, its ability to attract and retain a sufficient number of qualified restaurant managers, and the availability of sufficient financing.
Properties. Fifty-two of the Company's restaurants are leased from third parties, another 34 are subleased under a master sublease agreement, 16 are owned and are situated on land leased from third parties and 9 are owned in fee simple. Most of the leases have initial terms of from 10 to 20 years and contain provisions permitting renewal for one or more specified terms at specified rental rates. Some leases provide for fixed annual rent plus rent based on a percentage of sales. The average restaurant contains approximately 10,000 square feet and seats approximately 300 guests.
Dynamic Foods' food manufacturing and distribution facility contains approximately 175,000 square feet and is situated on approximately 24 acres owned in fee simple by the Company in Lubbock, Texas. In addition, a grocery warehouse of approximately 36,000 square feet, a truck terminal of approximately 7,200 square feet and a sales office of approximately 4,000 square feet are located adjacent to the distribution facility.
The Company's executive offices in Lubbock, Texas consist of approximately 34,000 square feet situated on approximately three acres of land owned in fee simple by the Company. The Company believes that its properties will be adequate to conduct its current operations for the foreseeable future.
The Company leases one property from a third party and seven under a master sublease, owns eight buildings situated on land leased from third parties and owns
two buildings on land owned in fee simple, which are not used in the Company's restaurant business and are periodically leased to third parties.
Item 3.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings
On August 11, 1995, a complaint was filed in the District Court of Travis County, Texas by the former Chairman of the Board of the Parent, Michael J. Levenson, both individually and on behalf of his minor son Jonathan Jacob Levenson, James Rich Levenson, Benjamin Aaron Levenson, S.D. Levenson, General Consulting Group, Inc. and Cerros Morado. The complaint named as defendants the Parent, the Company, Furr's/Bishop's Cafeterias, L.P., Cavalcade & Co., individual members of the Board of Directors of the Parent, Houlihan, Lokey, Howard & Zukin, Inc., KL Park Associates, L.P. ("KL Park"), KL Group, Inc. ("KL Group"), Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, certain of the then current and former 11% Noteholders, Deloitte & Touche LLP, Kmart and certain partners and employees of the foregoing.
The complaint alleged, among other things, that the Parent and certain defendants conspired to wrest control of the Parent away from the Levensons by fraudulently inducing them to transfer their working control of the Parent through a series of transactions in which the Levensons transferred Old Class B Common Stock and stock options in the Parent to KL Park and KL Group. Plaintiffs initially sought actual damages of approximately $16.4 million, as well as punitive damages. In a Fifth Amended Petition filed on or about February 3, 1997, plaintiffs sought an unspecified amount of actual damages, alleging only that their actual damages claim is "no more than $400 million." The Parent's management believes the allegations are completely without merit and intends to defend the action vigorously.
On October 6, 1995, the Levensons filed a Notice of Non-Suit as to certain of the defendants, including the Parent, the Company, Furr's/Bishop's Cafeterias, L.P., Cavalcade & Co. and the individual members of the Board of Directors of the Parent (other than William E. Prather and Kevin E. Lewis) and amended their complaint. As a result of such Notice of Non-Suit, the named entities and individuals are no longer defendants in the Levenson litigation. In addition, Deloitte & Touche LLP has settled with the plaintiffs and has been voluntarily dismissed from the case.
The Parent is required to indemnify certain of the defendants originally named in the Levensons' complaint, including the individual members of the Board of Directors and certain of their affiliated entities pursuant to the Parent's Certificate of Incorporation and otherwise, for any and all damages that may result from such complaint. As part of the Restructuring, the Parent and the Company also agreed to indemnify certain parties named as defendants in the Levensons' complaint, including the 11% Noteholders, KL Group, KL Park and Kmart, from and against all claims, actions, suits and other legal proceedings, damages, costs, interest, charges, counsel fees and other expenses and penalties which such entity may sustain or incur to any person whatsoever (excluding judgments in the case of KL Group and KL Park) by reason of or arising out of the Levenson litigation. Under no circumstances will the Parent be obligated to indemnify any party for any liability resulting from such party's willful misconduct or bad faith.
On June 7, 1996, the Parent, the Company and Kevin E. Lewis entered into the Consulting and Indemnity Agreement and General Release pursuant to which the Parent and the Company agreed to release any claims it may have against Mr.
Lewis and to indemnify and hold harmless Mr. Lewis, to the fullest extent permitted by law, from and against all judgments, costs, interest, charges, counsel fees and other expense relating to or in connection with any claims, actions, suits and other proceedings by reason of or arising out of any action or inaction by Mr. Lewis in his capacity as an officer, director, employee or agent of the Company and its affiliates, including the Parent, except to the extent that such claim or indemnification arises directly from any claim or cause of action that the Company or its affiliates may have that relates to or arises from Mr. Lewis' knowingly fraudulent, dishonest or willful misconduct, or receipt of any personal profit or advantage that he is not legally entitled to receive.
The amount of legal fees and other expenses paid in respect to the Levenson litigation decreases the amount of cash available to the Company to pay its outstanding indebtedness and other obligations. An adverse judgment against the Company or any of the other defendants which the Parent is required to indemnify, a settlement by any defendant which the Parent is required to indemnify or the continued payment of substantial legal fees and other expenses could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Item 4.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
PART II
Item 5.

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Market Information
The partnership units of the Company are not traded on any exchange.
Holders
The Parent owns all of the 1% general partner interest and owns all of the 99% limited partnership interest (4% is owned indirectly and 95% is owned directly).
Item 6.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data (in thousands, except per share/unit data)
See Chart on Next Page
Item 7.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The Company's fiscal year is a 52-53 week year. The 1996 and 1995 fiscal years included 52 weeks and fiscal 1994 included 53 weeks.
The following table sets forth certain statement of operations data and restaurant data for the fiscal years indicated (dollars in thousands, except sales per unit):
On January 2, 1996, stockholders of the Parent approved a series of financial restructuring transactions resulting in the recognition by the Company of a $157,619 extraordinary credit in the fiscal year ended January 2, 1996.
(1) On February 12, 1997, the Company opened a new cafeteria unit in Big Spring, Texas that had been under construction since 1996.
FIFTY-TWO WEEKS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996:
Results of operations. Sales for the fifty-two week fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 were $197.4 million, a decrease of $12.7 million from the fiscal year ended January 2, 1996. The operating income for the 1996 fiscal year was $8.8
million compared to a loss of $10.9 million in fiscal year 1995. The operating results of fiscal 1996 included net special credits of $1.1 million compared to special charges of $12.3 million in the prior year. Net income for fiscal 1996 was $8.6 million, compared to a net loss before extraordinary items of $37.2 million for fiscal 1995.
Sales. Restaurant sales in comparable units were 0.04% higher in fiscal 1996 than 1995. For the units that were open for the entire year, average weekly sales were $33,449 in fiscal 1996. Sales in 1996 were lower than the prior year by $10.9 million as a result of sixteen fewer units being included in the results of operations in the current year. Revenues in fiscal year 1996 included $2.9 million of Dynamic Foods sales to third parties and $1.9 million from the two Zoo-Kini's Soups, Salads and Grill restaurants.
Cost of sales. Excluding depreciation, cost of sales was 31.2% of sales for fiscal year 1996 compared to 32.3% for fiscal year 1995. The decrease in the percentage of sales was principally the result of lower product costs that were partially offset by changes in the menu mix.
Selling, general and administrative. Selling, General and Administrative expense was lower in the aggregate by $9.0 million in fiscal year 1996. Of the decrease, $7.6 million was due to operating results including sixteen fewer units. SG&A expense includes decreases of $1.9 million in marketing expense, including discounts, $339 thousand in repair and maintenance, $283 thousand in utility expenses and $234 thousand in supplies expenses. SG&A expense includes an increase of $601 thousand in professional service expenses.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense was $3.8 million lower than the prior year, due to the reduction of certain depreciable assets in 1995 in accordance with SFAS 121 partially offset by the reduction in the useful lives of certain depreciable assets in the prior year.
Special credits and charges. The operating results for fiscal 1996 include net special credits aggregating $1.1 million. Included in the total are credits of $699 thousand for the insurance proceeds related to a fire loss, $709 thousand for the termination of a trademark royalty agreement and the modification and extension of a lease related to the Company's former El Paso Bar-B-Que Company restaurants and a charge of $270 thousand related to the search for a new Chief Executive Officer and a consulting agreement with Kevin E. Lewis, Chairman of the Board. The loss from operations for the fiscal year ended January 2, 1996 includes special charges of $12.3 million, which includes charges to reserves of $4.5 million related to the closing of fourteen units, including two units to be closed in future periods, and adjustments to the units previously reserved. Also included is $7.8 million to recognize the write-down of certain assets to estimated fair values in accordance with the adoption of SFAS 121.
Interest expense. Interest expense was lower than the prior year by $26.0 million as a result of the Restructuring. In accordance with SFAS 15, the restructured debt was recorded at the sum of all future principal and interest payments and there is no recognition of interest expense thereon.
Extraordinary credit. The results of fiscal year 1995 include an extraordinary credit of $157.6 million relating to the reduction of debt in a series of financial restructuring transactions.
FIFTY-TWO WEEKS ENDED JANUARY 2, 1996:
Results of operations. Sales for the fifty-two week fiscal year ended January 2, 1996 were $210.1 million, a decrease of $15.1 million from the fifty-three week fiscal year ended January 3, 1995. The operating loss for the fiscal year ended 1995 was $10.9 million compared to operating income of $3.9 million in fiscal year 1994. The operating results of fiscal 1995 included special charges of $12.3 million compared to $2.2 million in the prior year. Net loss before extraordinary items for fiscal 1995 was $37.2 million, compared to $19.7 million for fiscal 1994.
Sales. Restaurant sales in comparable units were 2.2% lower in fiscal 1995 than 1994. For the units that were open for the entire year, average weekly sales were $32,916 in fiscal 1995. Sales in 1995 were lower than the prior year by $6.8 million as a result of sixteen fewer units being included in the results of operations in the current year and were lower by $2.7 million as a result of three fewer specialty restaurants being included in the results of operations in the current year. Sales were lower in fiscal 1995 by approximately $3.7 million due to there being one less week than the prior fiscal year. Sales in fiscal year 1995 included $4.6 million of Dynamic Foods sales to third parties and $1.9 million from the two Zoo-Kini's Soups, Salads and Grill restaurants.
Cost of sales. Excluding depreciation, cost of sales was 32.3% of sales for fiscal year 1995 compared to 31.2% for fiscal year 1994. The increase in the percentage of sales was the result of continued changes in the menu mix designed to improve food quality and variety and to create a better value for the guest.
Selling, general and administrative. SG&A expense was lower in the aggregate by $10.6 million in fiscal year 1995. Of the decrease, $6.3 million was due to operating results including sixteen fewer units and $2.0 million was due to operating three fewer specialty restaurants. SG&A expense includes decreases of $2.8 million in salaries, wages and related benefits, $3.5 million in marketing expense, including discounts, $902 thousand in taxes, and $442 thousand in travel and related expenses. SG&A expense includes increases of $878 thousand in professional service expenses and $417 thousand in repair and maintenance expenses.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense was $2.7 million higher than the prior year, due primarily to the reduction in the estimated useful lives of certain depreciable assets.
Special charges. The loss from operations for the fiscal year ended January 2, 1996 includes special charges of $12.3 million, which includes charges to reserves of $4.5 million related to the closing of fourteen units, including two units to be closed in future periods, and adjustments to the units previously reserved. Also included is $7.8 million to recognize the write-down of certain assets to estimated fair values in accordance with the adoption of SFAS 121. The loss from operations for the fiscal year ended January 3, 1995 includes special charges of $2.7 million resulting primarily from the closing of one buffet restaurant and one specialty restaurant and a credit of $442 thousand related to the settlement of a lawsuit.
Interest expense. Interest expense was $2.6 million higher than the prior year as a result of the deferral of the interest payments that were due on dates
from December 31, 1993, through and including December 31, 1995 and the related interest thereon, as well as the interest on the GEPT judgment.
Extraordinary credit. The results of fiscal year 1995 include an extraordinary credit of $157.6 million relating to the reduction of debt in a series of financial restructuring transactions.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123"), which requires companies to adopt a method of accounting for valuing compensation attributable to stock options. SFAS 123 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1995. As allowed under the provisions of SFAS 123, the Company has elected to continue accounting for such compensation as provided by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25.
Effective January 2, 1996, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121") and recorded a special charge of $7.8 million to recognize the write-down of certain assets in property, plant and equipment to estimated fair value, based on expected future cash flows. SFAS 121 requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
In June 1996, the Financial Accounting Standards Board adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities" ("SFAS 125"), which provides accounting and reporting standards for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities occurring after December 31, 1996. SFAS 125 has been amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 127 which amends the effective date of certain provisions for these transactions occurring after December 31, 1997. Management of the Company believes that the impact from adopting the provisions of SFAS 125 in fiscal 1998 will not be material.
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" ("SFAS 128"), which provides accounting and reporting standards for calculating earnings per share after December 15, 1997. Management of the Company believes that the impact from adopting the provisions of SFAS 128 in fiscal year 1998 will not be material.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES:
During fiscal 1996, cash provided from operating activities of the Company was $17.8 million compared to $9.9 million in 1995. Cash used for the payment of interest was approximately $3.8 million in 1996 compared to $36 thousand during 1995. The Company made capital expenditures of $10.1 million during 1996 compared to $8.0 million during 1995. Cash, temporary investments and marketable securities were $3.7 million at December 31, 1996 compared to $964 thousand at January 2, 1996. The cash balance at January 2, 1996 included $800 thousand which was restricted pursuant to collateral requirements in a letter of credit agreement. The current ratio of the Company was .40:1 at December 31, 1996 compared to .30:1 at January 2, 1996. The Company's total assets at
December 31, 1996 aggregated $86.3 million compared to $86.1 million at January 2, 1996.
The Company's restaurants are a cash business. Funds available from cash sales are not needed to finance receivables and are not generally needed immediately to pay for food, supplies and certain other expenses of the restaurants. Therefore, the business and operations of the Company have not historically required proportionately large amounts of working capital, which is generally common among similar restaurant companies. Should Dynamic Foods expand its sales to third parties, the accounts receivable and inventory related to such sales could require the Company to maintain additional working capital.
The Company has outstanding $74.6 million of 12% Notes due December 31, 2001, including $28.9 million of accrued interest. Under the terms of the 12% Notes, a semi-annual cash interest payment of approximately $2.7 million is due on each March 31 and September 30. The obligations of the Company under the 12% Notes are secured by a security interest in and a lien on all of the personal property of the Company and mortgages on all fee and leasehold properties of the Company (to the extent such properties are mortgageable).
The Company intends to pursue a program of remodeling existing cafeterias and opening new restaurants. The Company anticipates expending approximately $5 to $7 million in fiscal year 1997 to remodel existing cafeterias and open new restaurants and to make other capital expenditures. No assurance can be given that the Company will generate sufficient funds from operations or obtain alternative financing sources to enable it to make the anticipated capital expenditures.
The Company, from time to time, considers whether disposition of certain of its assets, including its food processing and distribution operations, real estate owned in fee simple and leasehold interests, or potential acquisitions of assets would be beneficial or appropriate for the long-term goals of the Company and in order to increase shareholder value.
The Company's, the sponsor of the Cavalcade Pension Plan, has agreed to provide for funding at least two-thirds of the $4.6 million of the unfunded current liability which existed at the end of fiscal 1992 by the end of 1998. If the agreed upon funding is not satisfied by the minimum required annual contributions, as adjusted for the deficit reduction contribution and determined under Section 412 of the Internal Revenue Code, the Company will make contributions in excess of the minimum annual requirement.
On November 15, 1993, the Company entered into the Amendment to Master Sublease Agreement, dated as of December 1, 1986, with Kmart pursuant to which, among other things, the aggregate monthly rent for the period September 1, 1993 through and including December 31, 1996 was reduced by 25%, or approximately $1.6 million annually, and the aggregate monthly rent for the period January 1, 1997 through and including December 31, 1999 was reduced by 20%, or approximately $1.2 million annually; provided that, during such period, among other things, Kevin E. Lewis remains as Chairman of the Board of the Company. On June 7, 1996, the Parent and the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Lewis pursuant to which Mr. Lewis would resign as Chairman of the Board on December 31, 1996, unless requested by the Board of Directors to continue until December 31, 1997. In December 1996, Mr. Lewis was requested to continue as Chairman of the Board into 1997. As a consequence of this action, the Parent and the Company anticipates entering into negotiations with Kmart to modify the
amendment to remove the provisions requiring Mr. Lewis to remain as Chairman of the Board until the end of 1999. No assurance can be given that Kmart will agree to such modification.
Item 8.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The Company's fiscal year is a 52-53 week year. The 1996 and 1995 fiscal years include 52 weeks and fiscal 1994 includes 53 weeks.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Schedule
Page No.
Independent Auditors' Reports
Consolidated Balance Sheets-- December 31, 1996 and January 2, 1996
Consolidated Statements of Operations -- Years ended December 31, 1996, January 2, 1996 and January 3, 1995
Consolidated Statements of Partners' Deficit -- Years ended December 31, 1996, January 2, 1996 and January 3, 1995
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -- Years ended December 31, 1996, January 2, 1996 and January 3, 1995
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -- Years ended December 31, 1996, January 2, 1996 and January 3, 1995
Financial Statement Schedule -- The Financial Statement Schedule filed as a part of this report is listed in "Index to Financial Statement Schedules" at Item 14 S-1
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Comprising Item 8 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K to the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
CAFETERIA OPERATORS, L.P. Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 1996, January 2, 1996 and January 3, 1995
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners Cafeteria Operators, L.P. Lubbock, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Cafeteria Operators, L.P., (a Delaware limited partnership wholly owned by Furr's/Bishop's, Incorporated) and subsidiaries (collectively, the Partnership) as of December 31, 1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the 52-week year then ended. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule for the 52-week year ended December 31, 1996 listed in the Index at Item 14 (a)(2). These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the December 31, 1996 consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cafeteria Operators, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the 52-week year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule for the 52-week year ended December 31, 1996, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Notes 1 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 2, 1996, the Company changed its method of accounting for impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121.
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
February 7, 1997 Dallas, Texas
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners Cafeteria Operators, L.P. Lubbock, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Cafeteria Operators, L.P., (a Delaware limited partnership wholly owned by Furr's/Bishop's, Incorporated) and subsidiaries (collectively, the Partnership) as of January 2, 1996 and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the 52-week year ended January 2, 1996 and the 53-week year ended January 3, 1995. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule for the 52-week year ended January 2, 1996 and the 53-week year ended January 3, 1995 listed in the Index at Item 14 (a)(2). These financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cafeteria Operators, L.P. and subsidiaries, as of January 2, 1996 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the 52-week year ended January 2, 1996 and the 53-week year ended January 3, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule for the 52-week year ended January 2, 1996 and the 53-week year ended January 3, 1995, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Notes 1 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 2, 1996, the Partnership changed its method of accounting for impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
March 28, 1996 Dallas, Texas
CAFETERIA OPERATORS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (A Delaware Limited Partnership Wholly Owned by Furr's/Bishop's, Incorporated) - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, JANUARY 2, 1996 AND JANUARY 3, 1995 (Dollars in Thousands) - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation - Cafeteria Operators, L.P. (the "Company"), a Delaware limited partnership, is wholly owned by Furr's/Bishop's, Incorporated (the "Parent") and operates cafeterias and specialty restaurants. The financial statements presented herein are the consolidated financial statements of Cafeteria Operators, L.P. and its subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The financial statements reflect the results of a series of transactions relating to the financial restructuring of the Parent at January 2, 1996, as described in Note 2.
The activities of the Company are governed by the terms of the partnership agreement, as amended (the "Partnership Agreement"). Prior to the financial restructuring described in Note 2, the Company owned the 1% general partner interest in the Company and wholly owned the 99% limited partner interest through its wholly owned subsidiary Furr's/Bishop's Cafeterias, L.P. (the "Holding Partnership"). As a result of a series of transactions relating to the financial restructuring, 95% of the limited partner interest was transferred to the Parent. The Parent, as the general partner, has exclusive and complete discretion in managing the business and operations of the Company, as provided in the Partnership Agreement.
Fiscal Year - The Company operates on a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Tuesday nearest December 31. The fiscal years ended December 31, 1996 and January 2, 1996 each represent a 52-week year and the fiscal year ended January 3, 1995 represents a 53-week year.
Business Segments - The Company operates in a single business segment, namely the operation of cafeterias and restaurants which includes retailing, food processing, warehousing and distribution of food products, and real estate in twelve states in the Southwest, West and Midwest areas of the United States.
Cash and Cash Equivalents - The Company has a cash management program which provides for the investment of excess cash balances in short-term investments. These investments have original or remaining maturities of three months or less at date of acquisition, are highly liquid and are considered to be cash equivalents for purposes of the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of cash flows.
Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market.
Prepaid Expenses and Other - Direct costs comprising legal and consulting fees of $2,144 relating to the restructuring discussed in Note 2 were capitalized at January 3, 1995 and as of January 2, 1996 were charged off as a part of the extraordinary item. As of December 31, 1996 and January 2, 1996, this account balance included prepaid rent of $3 and $748, respectively, along with other assets recorded in the ordinary course of business.
Property, Plant and Equipment - Property, plant and equipment is generally recorded at cost, while certain assets considered to be impaired are recorded at the estimated fair value. All property, plant and equipment is depreciated at annual rates based upon the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. Restaurant equipment is generally depreciated over a period of 1 to 5 years, while the useful life of manufacturing equipment is considered to be 5 to 10 years. Buildings are depreciated over a 30 year useful life, while improvements to owned buildings have estimated useful lives of 3 to 5 years. Provisions for amortization of leasehold improvements are made at annual rates based upon the estimated useful lives of the assets or terms of the leases, whichever is shorter.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets - Effective January 2, 1996, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 121") and recorded a special charge of $7,772 for the year ended January 2, 1996 to recognize the write-down of certain assets in property, plant and equipment to estimated fair value, based on expected future cash flows. SFAS 121 requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Start-Up and Closing Costs of Restaurants - Start-up and preopening costs incurred in connection with a new restaurant becoming operational are expensed as incurred.
When the decision to close a restaurant is made, the present value of all fixed and determinable costs to be incurred after operations cease is accrued. These fixed and determinable costs consist primarily of obligations defined in lease agreements such as rent and common area maintenance, reduced by sublease income, if any. If a decision is made to keep or reopen such restaurants, the remaining costs are reversed.
Advertising Costs - Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Total advertising expense was $2,085, $4,455 and $8,970 for the years ended December 31, 1996, January 2, 1996 and January 3, 1995.
Unfavorable Leases - For leases acquired through purchase, the net excess of future lease payments over the fair value of these payments is being amortized over the lives of the leases to which the differences relate.
Income Taxes - For state and federal income tax purposes, the Company is not a tax-paying entity. As a result, the taxable income or loss, which may vary substantially from income or loss reported for financial reporting purposes, should be included in the state and federal tax returns of the individual partners. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes is reflected in the accompanying financial statements.
Allocation of Results of Operations - Each item of income, gain, loss and deduction is allocated in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as of and for the reporting periods and actual results may differ from such estimates.
Reclassification - Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform with current year classification.
2. RESTRUCTURING
On January 25, 1995, the Parent announced that it had entered into an Agreement in Principle dated as of January 24, 1995 (the "Agreement in Principle") among the Parent, its subsidiaries, the holders of the 11% Notes of the Company (the "11% Noteholders"), the holder of the 9% Note of Cavalcade Foods (both as defined in Note 4), the Trustees of General Electric Pension Trust ("GEPT"), and Kmart Corporation ("Kmart").
The Agreement in Principle provided for (i) the exchange of an aggregate of approximately $249,344 of debt of the Company for the issuance of $40,000 principal amount of new senior secured notes of the Company due 2001 pursuant to a new indenture and 95% of the limited partner interest of the Partnership, (ii) the exchange of warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 21.5% of the Parent's common stock for options to acquire an aggregate of 95% of a new class of common stock of the Parent ("Common Stock") and new five year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1% of the fully diluted Common Stock, (iii) the exchange of $6,117 of other obligations of the Company for the issuance of $1,700 principal amount of new senior secured notes of the Company due 2001 pursuant to a new indenture, (iv) the exchange of $11,737 of debt of Cavalcade Foods, Inc., an indirect subsidiary of the Parent ("Foods"), for options to acquire 2.5% of the Common Stock and an interest in certain land owned by a subsidiary of the Parent and (v) the exchange of the Parent's outstanding shares of Class A Common, Class B Common and Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate of 2.5% of the Common Stock and five year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4% of the fully diluted Common Stock (together, the "Restructuring"). The Restructuring became effective upon approval of the stockholders at a meeting held January 2, 1996.
The Restructuring has been accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 15 "Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings" ("SFAS 15"), under which the transactions include both a partial settlement and modification of terms. The fair value of the 95% limited partner interest issued by the Company as partial settlement of indebtedness in connection with the Restructuring was estimated based upon discounted cash flows anticipated from the reorganized business. The remaining indebtedness was recorded at the sum of all future principal and interest payments and, accordingly, interest expense is no longer recognized on the restructured debt. The amounts of indebtedness subject to modification in excess of the amount recorded in accordance with SFAS 15 was recorded as an extraordinary gain of $157,619, net of all expenses associated with the Restructuring. The extraordinary item is made up of the following: ===========
3. OTHER PAYABLES AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
Other payables and accrued expenses consist of the following: =========== ===========
4. LONG-TERM DEBT
Effective January 2, 1996, as part of the series of financial restructuring transactions described in Note 2, the Company issued $41,700 of 12% Senior Secured Notes, due December 31, 2001 (the "12% Notes"), to replace $40,000 of 11% Senior Secured Notes, due June 30, 1998 (the "11% Notes") and the interest accrued thereon and to terminate a $5,408 judgment and the interest accrued thereon. In January 1996, the Company also issued $4,073 of 12% Notes as payment in kind for all interest accrued as of January 23, 1996. All of the assets of the Company are pledged as collateral security on behalf of the holders of the 12% Notes. The Company also issued limited partner interests equal to 95% of the outstanding partnership interests in exchange for and in full satisfaction of the remaining $152,854 of 11% Notes, together with all interest accrued thereon.
Payments of interest on the 12% Notes are due each March 31 and September 30. However, for financial accounting reporting purposes, no interest expense will be recorded under SFAS 15, as all of the interest through maturity has been recorded as a liability.
The Company had other mortgages outstanding on certain real estate properties totaling $14 that were paid in full in 1996.
Long-term debt consists of the following:
At December 31, 1996, the scheduled aggregate amount of all maturities of long-term debt and interest classified as long-term debt for the next five years and thereafter is as follows: ========
5. PARTNERS' CAPITAL
On January 2, 1996, the Company issued an aggregate 95% limited partner interest to the 11% Noteholders in exchange for reductions of debt and interest thereon, as described in Note 2. Subsequent to year end, the holders of the 95% limited partner interest exercised their option to put the limited partner interest to the Parent in exchange for common stock of the Parent. As a result of a series of financial restructuring transactions, the Parent owns a 1% general partner interest and 95% limited partner interest and indirectly owns the remaining 4% limited partner interest through the Holding Partnership.
The Company made a distribution to the Holding Partnership during 1996 by issuing 12% Notes in the amount of $1,700. The liability for the notes was recorded as $3,041, including interest accrued through maturity of the notes in accordance with SFAS 15.
Each item of income, gain, loss and deduction is allocated in accordance with the Partnership Agreement based on the partners' respective percentage interest. The allocation of losses and deductions, including those of subsidiary partnerships, are limited to the respective partners' bases.
6. INCOME TAXES
The Company is currently a nontaxable entity.
The Internal Revenue Service (the "Service") has examined the federal income tax returns of certain of the Parent's subsidiaries for years prior to 1990. The Service asserts deficiencies of approximately $2,500, plus interest from the date such amounts are deemed payable. Petitions have been filed to dispute the claims and the parties are negotiating toward a settlement. The Parent intends to vigorously contest the Service's assessment and believes that the outcome of the litigation will not have a material adverse effect on its equity, results of operations, and liquidity and capital resources after consideration of the applicable amounts previously accrued.
7. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan for which benefit accruals were frozen effective June 30, 1989. The funding policy is to make the minimum annual contribution required by applicable regulations. The Company, the sponsor of the plan, agreed to provide for funding by the 1998 plan year, of at least two-thirds of the $4,569 of the unfunded current liability which existed at the beginning of the 1993 plan year. If the agreed upon funding is not satisfied by the minimum required annual contributions, as adjusted for the deficit reduction contribution, determined under Section 412 of the Internal Revenue Code, the Company will make contributions in excess of the minimum annual requirement. Pension expense was $590, $592 and $785 for the years ended December 31, 1996, January 2, 1996 and January 3, 1995, respectively.
The Company is required to recognize the additional minimum liability aspects of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions" ("SFAS 87"). SFAS 87 requires the recognition of an additional pension liability in the amount of the Company's unfunded accumulated benefit obligation in excess of accrued pension cost with an equal amount to be recognized as either an intangible asset or a reduction of equity. Based upon plan actuarial and asset information as of January 2, 1996 and December 31, 1996, the Company recorded an increase at January 2, 1996 and a decrease at December 31, 1996 to the noncurrent pension liability and a corresponding decrease or increase to partners' deficit of $1,992 and $2,429, respectively.
The funded status of the plan amounts recognized in the balance sheets and major assumptions used to determine these amounts are as follows:
Effective December 31, 1996, for purposes of calculating benefit obligations, the assumed discount rate increased from 7.00% to 7.75% to reflect the current financial market for high-quality debt instruments. There have been no other changes in the plan's major actuarial assumptions for the two years ended December 31, 1996.
The Company also has a voluntary savings plan covering all eligible employees of the Company and its subsidiaries through which it may contribute discretionary amounts as approved by the Board of Directors of the Parent. Administrative expenses paid by the Company for the years ended December 31, 1996, January 2, 1996 and January 3, 1995 amounted to $7, $2 and $24, respectively.
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company leases restaurant properties under various noncancelable operating lease agreements which expire between 1997 and 2015 and require various minimum annual rentals. Certain leases contain escalation clauses. Further, many leases have renewal options ranging from one five-year period to ten five-year periods. Certain of the leases also require the payment of property taxes, maintenance charges, advertising charges, insurance and parking lot charges, and additional rentals based on percentages of sales in excess of specified amounts.
On November 15, 1993, the Company entered into an amendment of a master sublease agreement pursuant to which it leased 43 properties from Kmart. Pursuant to the amendment and subject to the terms and conditions thereof, two properties were removed from the master sublease, and the aggregate monthly
rent for the period August 1, 1993 through and including December 31, 1996 was reduced by 25% and the aggregate monthly rent for the period January 1, 1997 through and including December 31, 1999 has been reduced by 20%. The reductions in rent are subject to termination by Kmart if Kevin E. Lewis ceases to be Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Parent. On June 7, 1996, the Parent and the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Lewis pursuant to which Mr. Lewis would resign as Chairman of the Board on December 31, 1996, unless requested by the Board of Directors to continue until December 31, 1997. In December 1996, Mr. Lewis was requested to continue as Chairman of the Board into 1997. As a consequence of this action, the Parent anticipates entering into negotiations with Kmart to modify the amendment to remove the provisions requiring Mr. Lewis to remain as Chairman of the Board until the end of 1999. No assurance can be given that Kmart will agree to such modification. In consideration for these lease term modifications, the Parent granted Kmart warrants to purchase 1.7 million shares of Class A Common Stock of the Parent on or before September 1, 2003, at $0.75 per share. As a part of the Restructuring, effective January 2, 1996, these warrants were terminated and replaced with warrants to purchase 8,108,159 shares of Common Stock on or before January 2, 2001, at $0.074 per share, and following the reverse stock split, Kmart retained warrants to purchase 540,544 shares at $1.11 per share.
The total minimum annual rental commitment and future minimum sublease rental income under noncancelable operating leases are as follows as of December 31, 1996:
Total rental expense included in the statements of operations is $10,916, $11,929 and $12,375, which includes $1,077, $1,187 and $1,095 of additional rent based on net sales for the years ended December 31, 1996, January 2, 1996 and January 3, 1995, respectively. The results of operations include sublease rent income of $760, $717 and $312 for the years ended December 31, 1996, January 2, 1996 and January 3, 1995, respectively.
The Company, in the ordinary course of business, is a party to various legal actions. In the opinion of management, these actions ultimately will be disposed of in a manner which will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company's equity, results of operations, and liquidity and capital resources after consideration of the applicable amounts previously accrued.
On August 11, 1995, a complaint was filed in the District Court of Travis County, Texas by former Chairman of the Board of the Parent, Michael J. Levenson, both individually and on behalf of his minor son Jonathan Jacob Levenson, James Rich Levenson, Benjamin Aaron Levenson, S.D. Levenson, General Consulting Group, Inc. and Cerros Morado. The complaint named as defendants
the Parent, the Company, Furr's/Bishop's Cafeterias, L.P., Cavalcade & Co., individual members of the Board of Directors, Houlihan, Lokey, Howard & Zukin, Inc., KL Park Associates, L.P. ("KL Park"), KL Group, Inc. ("KL Group"), Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, certain of the then current and former 11% Noteholders, Deloitte & Touche LLP, Kmart and certain partners and employees of the foregoing.
The complaint alleged, among other things, that the Parent and certain defendants conspired to wrest control of the Parent away from the Levensons by fraudulently inducing them to transfer their working control of the Parent through a series of transactions in which the Levensons transferred Class B Common Stock and stock options in the Parent to KL Park and KL Group. Plaintiffs initially sought actual damages of approximately $16,425, as well as punitive damages. In a Fifth Amended Petition filed on or about February 3, 1997, plaintiffs sought an unspecified amount of actual damages, alleging only that their actual damages claim is "no more than $400 million." The Parent's management believes the allegations are completely without merit and intends to defend the action vigorously.
On October 6, 1995, the Levensons filed a Notice of Non-Suit as to certain of the defendants, including the Parent, the Company, Furr's/Bishop's Cafeterias, L.P., Cavalcade & Co. and specific individual members of the Board of Directors (other than William E. Prather and Kevin E. Lewis) and amended their complaint. As a result of such Notice of Non-Suit, the named entities and individuals are no longer defendants in the Levenson litigation. In addition, Deloitte & Touche LLP has settled with the plaintiffs and has been voluntarily dismissed from the case.
The Parent is required to indemnify certain of the defendants originally named in the Levensons' complaint, including the individual members of the Board of Directors and certain of their affiliated entities pursuant to the Parent's Certificate of Incorporation and otherwise, for any and all damages that may result from such complaint. As part of the Restructuring, the Parent also agreed to indemnify certain parties named as defendants in the Levensons' complaint, including the 11% Noteholders, KL Group, KL Park and Kmart, from and against all claims, actions, suits and other legal proceedings, damages, costs, interest, charges, counsel fees and other expenses and penalties which such entity may sustain or incur to any person whatsoever (excluding judgments in the case of KL Group and KL Park) by reason of or arising out of the Levenson litigation. Under no circumstances will the Parent be obligated to indemnify any party for any liability resulting from such party's willful misconduct or bad faith.
On June 7, 1996, the Parent, the Company and Kevin E. Lewis entered into the Consulting and Indemnity Agreement and General Release pursuant to which the Parent and the Company agreed to release any claims it may have against Mr. Lewis and to indemnify and hold harmless Mr. Lewis, to the fullest extent permitted by law, from and against all judgments, costs, interest, charges, counsel fees and other expense relating to or in connection with any claims, actions, suits and other proceedings by reason of or arising out of any action or inaction by Mr. Lewis in his capacity as an officer, director, employee or agent of the Company and its affiliates, including the Parent, except to the extent that such claim or indemnification arises directly from any claim or cause of action that the Company or its affiliates may have that relates to or arises from Mr. Lewis' knowingly fraudulent, dishonest or willful misconduct, or receipt of any personal profit or advantage that he is not legally entitled to receive.
The amount of legal fees and other expenses paid in respect to the Levenson litigation decreases the amount of cash available to the Parent to pay its outstanding indebtedness and other obligations. An adverse judgment against the Parent or any of the other defendants which the Parent is required to indemnify, a settlement by any defendant which the Parent is required to indemnify or the continued payment of substantial legal fees and other expenses could have a material adverse effect on the Parent.
9. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company had receivables from the general partner of $157 and $28 at December 31, 1996 and January 2, 1996, respectively.
On June 7, 1996, the Parent, the Company and Kevin E. Lewis entered into the Consulting and Indemnity Agreement and General Release (the "Consulting Agreement") pursuant to which, among other things, Mr. Lewis would resign as President and Chief Executive Officer effective September 30, 1996 and would resign his position as Chairman of the Board on December 31, 1996, unless requested by the Board of Directors to continue until December 31, 1997. On September 17, 1996, at the request of the Board of Directors, Mr. Lewis agreed to remain President and Chief Executive Officer beyond September 30, 1996 with no change to the financial terms of the Consulting Agreement. On December 24, 1996, Mr. Lewis resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer effective December 31, 1996 and was requested by the Board to continue as Chairman of the
Board into 1997. After his resignation as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Lewis will serve as a consultant to the Company until December 31, 1997. Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Lewis will receive an annual base salary of $350 pro-rated through the end of 1996 and $250 through the end of 1997. Mr. Lewis received $75 upon the execution of the Consulting Agreement, $75 on September 30, 1996 and will receive $100 on December 31, 1997. In addition, Mr. Lewis is entitled to receive $100 if requested to assist in certain negotiations on behalf of the Parent and additional compensation based upon the success of such negotiations. Furthermore, the Parent agreed to pay, among other things, certain legal expenses of Mr. Lewis incurred in connection with the negotiation of the Consulting Agreement and certain travel and moving related expenses. Effective January 1, 1997, Kenneth Reimer assumed the duties of President and Chief Executive Officer of the Parent on an interim basis. Mr. Reimer will receive $25 per month for each full or partial month of service and an additional $25 upon his resignation, if after March 31, 1997, or removal. The Board of Directors is conducting a search for an individual to serve as a permanent President and Chief Executive Officer of the Parent.
Since February 1996, Cactus Enterprises, Inc., a company wholly owned by Kenneth Reimer, has performed certain management consulting services for the Board. Compensation for such services has been paid by the Parent at a rate of $2 per day. Total fees and expenses paid in 1996 were approximately $68.
11. SPECIAL CHARGES AND CREDITS
Operating income for the thirteen week period ended October 1, 1996 includes a special credit of $709 for the proceeds received from the sale of certain trademarks and the termination of a trademark royalty agreement and the modification and extension of a lease related to the Parent's former El Paso Bar-B-Que Company restaurants. In addition, the Company recognized $174 of charges related to the Consulting Agreement and the search for a new President and Chief Executive Officer for the thirteen week period ended October 1, 1996 and $96 for the thirteen week period ended July 2, 1996. Operating income for the thirteen week period ended July 2, 1996 includes a special credit of $699 for insurance proceeds received related to a fire loss incurred in February 1994.
Operating loss for the thirteen week period ended January 2, 1996 includes special charges of $12,273, which includes $4,501 related to the reserve for store closings. Also included in the special charges is $7,772 to recognize the write-down of certain assets in property, plant and equipment to estimated fair values in accordance with the adoption of SFAS 121.
Operating income for the fifty-three week period ended January 3, 1995 includes special charges to reserves of $2,656 for the estimated costs of closing five cafeteria locations and one specialty restaurant, including approximately $1,164 for the write-down of certain assets in property, plant and equipment to estimated fair value. Also included is a credit of $442 related to the settlement of a lawsuit by the Internal Revenue Service.
12. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the requirements of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments" ("SFAS 107"). The estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessarily required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
At December 31, 1996 and January 2, 1996, the carrying amount and the fair value of the Company's financial instruments, as determined under SFAS 107, were as follows:
The Parent's long-term debt is held by a limited number of holders and is not publicly traded, and as a result, market quotes are not readily available. The fair value of the long-term debt at December 31, 1996 and January 2, 1996 is based upon the face amount of the debt resulting from the Restructuring described in Note 2 as management believes that this is most indicative of the fair value. The carrying values of accounts receivable, receivable from affiliates and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these financial instruments.
* * * * * *
Item 9.

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None PART III
Item 10.

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The names and ages of all current directors and executive officers of the Parent are set forth below. The Board of Directors of the Parent (the "Board") currently consists of six persons, each with one-year terms. The business address of each of the directors and executive officers listed below is c/o Furr's/Bishop's, Incorporated, 6901 Quaker Avenue, Lubbock, Texas 79413.
Directors and Executive Officers of Furr's/Bishop's, Incorporated
E.W. Williams, Jr. has been a member of the Board of Directors since 1991; Kevin E. Lewis was elected to the Board of Directors and appointed Chairman in June 1993 and each of the other Directors were elected to the Board of Directors in January 1996.
The business experience during the past five years of each director is summarized below.
Suzanne Hopgood has served as President of the Hopgood Group since founding the company in 1985. The company provides consulting, development and brokerage services to clients interested in hotel investments. Prior to founding the Hopgood Group, she served as Second Vice President at Aetna Realty Investors where she oversaw one-third of the corporation's multi-billion dollar real estate equity portfolio. Before joining Aetna, she was Vice President and Senior Loan Officer of the Lowell Institution for Savings in Lowell, Massachusetts. Ms. Hopgood serves on the board of directors of the Greater Hartford Arts Council and The Hartford Ballet, and is a director emerita of the Connecticut Business & Industry Association. She holds memberships in the Real Estate Exchange, Real Estate Finance Association and the Urban Land Institute.
She is a senior fellow of the American Leadership Forum and a recognized speaker at Pension Real Estate Association and Commercial Real Estate Finance & Securitization conferences.
Kevin E. Lewis was elected Chairman of the Board of the Parent on June 24, 1993 and served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Parent from July 1994 to December 1996. Prior to serving as Chairman of the Board of the Parent, Mr. Lewis was a Managing Director in the New York office of Houlihan, Lokey, Howard & Zukin, Inc., a specialty investment banking firm, where he had previously served as a Senior Vice President (January 1992 - March 1993), Vice President (January 1990 - December 1991) and Associate (June 1988 -December 1989). Mr. Lewis was a director of The LVI Group, Inc. from December 1991 to May 1993 and has been a director of Robertson-Ceco Corporation since July 1993.
Gilbert C. Osnos has been President of Gilbert C. Osnos & Co., Inc. since 1981, and a partner in Grisanti Galef & Osnos Associates since 1981. Mr. Osnos began with Grisanti Galef in 1979 and became a partner in 1981. Gilbert C. Osnos & Co., Inc. was also formed in 1981 doing business as Grisanti Galef & Osnos Associates. Mr. Osnos was a director of the Turnaround Management Association from 1988 to 1993 and Chairman in 1990-91 and a director of Trivest Financial Services Corporation and Reprise Capital from 1989 to 1991. Mr. Osnos has served on the boards of directors of Mrs. Fields, Inc. since 1993 and American Mirrex since March, 1996.
Kenneth F. Reimer, Ph.D. has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Reimer Enterprises, Inc. and Cactus Enterprises, Inc. engaging in management consulting activities and investment in child care centers since 1993. In January, 1997, Mr. Reimer became President and Chief Executive Officer of the Parent on an interim basis. Mr. Reimer was a director of S. A. Telecommunications, Inc. from 1993 to 1995. Prior to that, Mr. Reimer was CEO, President and a director of Roma Corporation from 1984 to 1993 and is passed Chairman of the Board of Trustees of St. Edward's University.
Sanjay Varma is the principal of Rosestar Management, LLC, an affiliate of Crescent Real Estate Equities, Ltd. since 1994. Mr. Varma was Executive Vice President of Walt Disney Company, responsible for the Euro Disney Resort from 1989 to 1994 and Walt Disney World Resorts from 1986 to 1989. Prior to 1986, Mr. Varma was Area Vice President of Food & Beverage for the Marriott Hotels where he worked for eight years.
E.W. Williams, Jr. is Chairman of the Board of the Citizens Bank in Slaton, Texas and Bank of Commerce in McLean, Texas; Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Hale County State Bank, Plainview, Texas and First National Bank in Clayton, New Mexico. Mr. Williams is also Chairman of LubCo BancShares, Inc., HaleCo BancShares, Inc., GrayCo BancShares, Inc. and Union BancShares, Inc. and is Chairman of the Board of Coyote Lake Feedyard, Inc., Muleshoe, Texas. Mr. Williams has held each of these positions for longer than five years. Mr. Williams was previously a director and executive committee member of the Texas Tech University President's Council; founder of the West Texas A&M University President's Council, and was previous director of the Southern Methodist University Foundation and Alumni Association. Mr. Williams also served as Chairman of the Amarillo Hospital District. Mr. Williams currently has farming and ranching interests in Garza County and Bailey County, Texas.
The business experience during the past five years of each executive officer who is not a director is summarized below.
Donald M. Dodson has been Vice President of Operations Services since 1993 and was formerly Vice President Food and Beverage from 1990 until 1993. He was Vice President of Operations from 1987 to 1990. Mr. Dodson joined the Company in 1958 and managed several cafeterias before becoming a District Manager in 1968.
John R. Egenbacher has been Vice President of Real Estate since 1993 and was formerly Manager of Real Estate from 1987 to 1993.
Jim H. Hale has been Vice President of Field Operations since April 1996 and was formerly a Regional Vice President since 1975. Mr. Hale joined the Company in 1964 and managed several cafeterias before being promoted to regional management.
Alton R. Smith has been Executive Vice President of the Parent since 1993, Secretary since 1995 and was formerly Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1989 until 1993. He was Vice President and Controller of the Parent between 1986 and 1989. Prior to 1986, Mr. Smith held various positions with the Parent, including Controller and Assistant Secretary from 1985 until 1986, Assistant Controller and Assistant Secretary from 1982 to 1985, Director of Taxation from 1978 to 1982 and Tax Manager from 1974 to 1978. He is a certified public accountant and joined the Company in 1974.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company's equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. Officers, directors and greater than ten-percent shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required for those persons, the Company believes that, during fiscal 1996 all filing requirements were complied with by its officers, directors, and greater than ten-percent beneficial owners.
Item 11.

Item 11. Executive Compensation
There is shown below information concerning the annual and long-term compensation for services in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries, and to the Parent, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1996, January 2, 1996 and January 3, 1995 of those persons who were, at December 31, 1996 (i) the chief executive officer, (ii) the four other most highly compensated executive officers of the Parent for the 1996 fiscal year (the "Named Officers"):
Option Grants
No grants of options were made during the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 to the Named Officers which are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. No appreciation rights were granted during fiscal 1996.
Option Exercises and Fiscal Year-End Values
At December 31, 1996, there were no options outstanding to the Named Officers.
Certain Compensation Plans
The Company has a qualified defined benefit pension plan (the "Pension Plan") covering employees and former employees of the Company and its affiliates, including those who were participants in the Kmart Corporation Employees' Retirement Pension Plan ( the "Kmart Pension Plan"). The Pension Plan assumed all of the obligations of the Kmart Pension Plan relating to benefits that accrued for employees and former employees of certain of the Company's subsidiaries through the consummation of the acquisition of such subsidiaries from Kmart. Kmart agreed to transfer an amount of plan assets equal to the actuarially computed accumulated benefits applicable to the Furr's and Bishop's employees in the Kmart Pension Plan.
Benefits for service prior to 1987 were based on the provisions of the Kmart Pension Plan and are frozen for such service. Effective December 31, 1988, the Pension Plan was frozen for highly compensated participants and effective June 30, 1989 benefit accruals of all participants in the Pension Plan were frozen indefinitely.
The Pension Plan covers all employees who are at least 21 years old and have one year or more of participation service and is integrated with Social Security. A participant's benefit under the Pension Plan will be the greater of (i) a benefit provided by the participant's "cash balance account" defined below, or (ii) the sum of (x) the participant's accrued benefit under the Kmart Pension Plan plus (y) for each year of service after 1986, 0.75% of the participant's "considered pay" for the year plus (z) 0.75% of considered pay exceeding the Social Security integration level for the year. "Considered pay" is comprised of total W-2 compensation, excluding extraordinary items, such as moving expenses and imputed income, and including pre-tax amounts deferred under the Employees' Savings Plan described below. The Social Security integration level is one-half of the Social Security Taxable Wage Base for the year, rounded to the next highest $1,000. A participant's cash balance account will contain an amount equal to the sum of (i) 2% of 1986 considered pay multiplied by the number of years of benefit service prior to 1987, plus (ii) 2% of considered pay for each year thereafter, plus (iii) 6% interest per annum. The normal form of benefit under the Pension Plan will be a life annuity for an unmarried participant and a 50% joint and survivor annuity in the case of a married participant. Alternatively, participants may elect an optional form of payment which is the actuarial equivalent of the life annuity. Participants are fully vested in accrued benefits under the Pension Plan after five years of vesting service. Unreduced benefits are payable at age 65, or, if earlier, when age plus years of service equals ninety.
The following table shows the amounts payable using the pension plan formula and the benefits accrued under the predecessor plans.
Approximate Annual Pension at Age 65*
* Estimates of frozen pension plan benefits.
The total plan years of service at June 30, 1989 (the date benefit accruals were frozen) of the five Named Officers of the Company and its subsidiaries are Kevin E. Lewis 0, Alton R. Smith 15, Donald M. Dodson 31, Jim H. Hale 26, and John R. Egenbacher 1. If Mr. Smith, Mr. Dodson, Mr. Hale and Mr. Egenbacher were to retire on their respective retirement dates, they would receive monthly payments of $848, $3,265, $2,027 and $117, respectively.
The Company established an Employees 401K Plan which is qualified under Sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Code (the "401K Plan"). Under the 401K Plan, participants may elect to make pre-tax contributions, in an amount equal to from 1% to 12% of "considered pay", which consists of total W-2 compensation for personal services, excluding extraordinary pay, such as moving expenses and imputed income. Pre-tax contributions were limited to $9,500 in 1996. Additionally, The Company may make discretionary contributions to the 401K Plan. Employees will be eligible to participate in the 401K Plan at age 21 with one year of participation service.
Participants' contributions are always fully vested. The Board of Directors of the Parent will either designate the Company and the Parent contributions as fully vested when made, or the Company and the Parent contributions will be subject to a vesting schedule under which 100% of the contributions are vested after seven years. Employee contributions may be invested either in a fixed income fund, consisting of guaranteed interest contracts and government securities, or five different equity funds with various growth and income objectives. Loans from participants' pre-tax accounts are permitted after two years of participation.
Participants may generally receive their vested account balances at the earlier of retirement or separation from service.
Non-employee directors of the Parent receive a fee of $1,500 per month and $1,000 per board meeting attended as compensation for their services. In addition, non-employee directors who are members of any Committee of the Board receive $500 for each meeting attended.
The Board of Directors of the Parent adopted, and on January 2, 1996 the stockholders approved, the 1995 Stock Option Plan authorizing an aggregate of 40,540,795 shares of Common Stock of the Parent (the "1995 Option Plan"). After giving effect to the reverse stock split, there are 2,702,720 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance pursuant to the 1995 Option Plan. A
Committee of the Board of Directors administers the 1995 Option Plan, including determining the employees to whom awards will be made, the size of such awards and the specific terms and conditions applicable to awards, such as vesting periods, circumstances of forfeiture and the form and timing of payment. Grants including stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock may be made to selected employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and non-employee directors of the Parent. On November 22, 1996, options to purchase 6,666 shares of Common Stock were issued to each non-employee director of the Parent pursuant to the provisions of the 1995 Option Plan.
On June 7, 1996, the Parent, the Company and Kevin E. Lewis entered into the Consulting and Indemnity Agreement and General Release (the "Consulting Agreement") pursuant to which, among other things, Mr. Lewis would resign as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Parent effective September 30, 1996 and would resign his position as Chairman of the Board of the Parent on December 31, 1996, unless requested by the Board of Directors to continue until December 31, 1997. On September 17, 1996 at the request of the Board of Directors, Mr. Lewis agreed to remain President and Chief Executive Officer beyond September 30, 1996 with no change to the financial terms of the Consulting Agreement. On December 24, 1996, Mr. Lewis resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer effective December 31, 1996 and was requested by the Board to continue as Chairman of the Board into 1997. After his resignation as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Parent, Mr. Lewis will serve as a consultant to the Company and the Parent until December 31, 1997. Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Lewis will receive an annual base salary of $350,000, pro-rated through the end of 1996 and $250,000 through the end of 1997. Mr. Lewis received $75,000 upon the execution of the Consulting Agreement, $75,000 on September 30, 1996 and will receive $100,000 on December 31, 1997. In addition, Mr. Lewis is entitled to receive $100,000 if requested to assist in certain negotiations on behalf of the Company and additional compensation based upon the success of such negotiations. Furthermore, the Company agreed to pay, among other things, certain legal expenses of Mr. Lewis incurred in connection with the negotiation of the Consulting Agreement and certain travel and moving related expenses.
Effective January 1, 1997, Kenneth Reimer assumed the duties of President and Chief Executive Officer of the Parent on an interim basis. Mr. Reimer will receive $25,000 per month for each full or partial month of service and an additional $25,000 upon his resignation, if after March 31, 1997, or removal. The Board of Directors is conducting a search for an individual to serve as a permanent President and Chief Executive Officer of the Parent.
Item 12.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Principal Stockholders
To the best knowledge of management of the Company, no person owned beneficially, as of February 28, 1997, more than five percent of the outstanding limited partnership units of the Company, except as follows:
Item 13.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Transactions with Management and Others
During the Restructuring, Chanin & Co. and Mr. Russell Belinsky, who was a director of the Parent during 1996, as a Managing Director of Chanin & Co. provided financial advisory services to the original 11% Noteholders. The fees and expenses of Chanin & Co. were paid by the Company and approximated $664,000 in 1995. The activities of Chanin & Co. were terminated at the close of the Restructuring on January 2, 1996.
Since February 1996, Cactus Enterprises, Inc., a company wholly owned by Kenneth Reimer, has performed certain management consulting services for the Board. Compensation for such services has been paid by the Company at a rate of $2,000 per day. Total fees and expenses paid in 1996 were approximately $68,000. Effective January 1, 1997, Mr. Reimer assumed the duties of the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Parent on an interim basis. The Board of Directors is conducting a search for an individual to serve as a permanent President and Chief Executive Officer of the Parent.
On June 7, 1996, the Parent, the Company and Kevin E. Lewis entered into the Consulting Agreement pursuant to which, among other things, Mr. Lewis would resign as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Parent effective September 30, 1996 and would resign his position as Chairman of the Board of the Parent on December 31, 1996, unless requested by the Board of Directors to continue until December 31, 1997. On September 17, 1996 at the request of the Board of Directors, Mr. Lewis agreed to remain President and Chief Executive Officer beyond September 30, 1996 with no change to the financial terms of the Consulting Agreement. On December 24, 1996, Mr. Lewis resigned as President
and Chief Executive Officer effective December 31, 1996 and was requested to remain as Chairman of the Board into 1997. After his resignation as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Lewis will serve as a consultant to the Company until December 31, 1997. Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Lewis will receive an annual base salary of $350,000, pro-rated through the end of 1996 and $250,000 through the end of 1997. Mr. Lewis received $75,000 upon the execution of the Consulting Agreement, $75,000 on September 30, 1996 and will receive $100,000 on December 31, 1997. In addition, Mr. Lewis is entitled to receive $100,000 if requested to assist in certain negotiations on behalf of the Company and additional compensation based upon the success of such negotiations. Furthermore, the Company agreed to pay, among other things, certain legal expenses of Mr. Lewis incurred in connection with the negotiation of the Consulting Agreement and certain travel and moving related expenses.
PART IV
Item 14.

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
(1) Financial Statements
The financial statements filed as part of this report are listed in the "Index to Consolidated Financial Statements" at Item 8.
(2) Financial Statement Schedule Cafeteria Operators, L.P.
Page Schedule Description No. -------- ----------- ---- II- Consolidated Valuation and Qualifying Accounts S-1
Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are either not applicable, not material or the required information has been given in the financial statements or in notes to the financial statements.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
During the fourth quarter of 1996, the Company filed no reports on Form 8-K.
(c) Exhibits
Exhibit No. Description
3.1 Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cafeteria Operators, L.P. (included as Exhibit I to the Exchange Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1).
3.2 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership of Cafeteria Operators, L.P. dated July 11, 1995, incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-4578).
4.1 Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of November 15, 1995, by and between Cafeteria Operators, L.P. and Fleet National Bank of Massachusetts (fka Shawmut Bank, N.A.), incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-4578).
4.2 First Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 24, 1996, by and between Cafeteria Operators, L.P. and Fleet National Bank of Massachusetts (fka Shawmut Bank, N.A.), incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-4578).
10.1 Exchange Agreement, dated as of November 15, 1995, among Furr's/Bishop's, Incorporated, Cafeteria Operators, L.P. and holders of the 11% Senior Secured Notes, incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-4578).
10.2 Consulting and Indemnity Agreement and General Release, dated as of June 7, 1996 by and between Kevin E. Lewis, Furr's/Bishop's, Incorporated and Cafeteria Operators, L.P., incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333- 4576) of Furr's/Bishop's, Incorporated.
10.3 First Amendment to Consulting and Indemnity Agreement and General Release, dated as of September 17, 1996 by and between Kevin E. Lewis, Furr's/Bishop's, Incorporated and Cafeteria Operators, L.P.
21.0 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CAFETERIA OPERATORS, L.P.
DATE: March 27, 1997 /s/ Kenneth F. Reimer --------------------------- Kenneth F. Reimer President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Managing General Partner of the Registrant and in the capacities (with Furr's/Bishop's, Incorporated, as Managing General Partner) and on the dates indicated.
DATE: March 27, 1997 /s/ Suzanne Hopgood ---------------------------- Suzanne Hopgood Director
DATE: March 27, 1997 /s/ Kevin E. Lewis ---------------------------- Kevin E. Lewis Director, Chairman of the Board
DATE: March 27, 1997 /s/ Gilbert C. Osnos ---------------------------- Gilbert C. Osnos Director
DATE: March 27, 1997 /s/ Alton R. Smith ---------------------------- Alton R. Smith Principal Accounting Officer
DATE: March 27, 1997 /s/ Sanjay Varma ---------------------------- Sanjay Varma Director
DATE: March 27, 1997 /s/ E. W. Williams, Jr. ---------------------------- E. W. Williams, Jr. Director
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF CAFETERIA OPERATORS, L.P.
Furr's/Bishop's Specialty Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries C-Tel, Inc. A Delaware limited partnership Doing business as Zoo-kini's Soup Salad and Grill
EXHIBIT 10.3
FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE ---------------------------------------
Reference is made to that certain Consulting and Indemnity Agreement and General Release (the "Agreement") dated as of the 7th day of June, 1996, by and between Kevin E. Lewis ("Lewis"), Cafeteria Operators, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the "Partnership") and Furr's/Bishop's, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"). The Agreement is hereby amended so that, notwithstanding the provisions of section 2(a) of the Agreement, Lewis shall not resign as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective September 30, 1996, but shall continue to serve in such offices until the earlier of (i) the date that Lewis takes action to formally resign from such offices or (ii) the date that the Board of Directors either requests Lewis to resign from such offices or otherwise takes action to formally remove Lewis from such offices. The Company, the Partnership and Lewis hereby agree that Lewis shall not be entitled to any additional compensation over and above the compensation presently set forth in the Agreement, nor shall the definition of Executive Office Resignation Date, as defined in the Agreement, be altered as a result of his continuing service as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company past September 30, 1996, and that all other provisions of the Agreement, as amended hereby, are and shall continue in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of September 17, 1996.
------------------------------------------------ Kevin E. Lewis
CAFETERIA OPERATORS, L.P. By: Furr's/Bishop's, Incorporated, its general partner
By: ---------------------------------------------
E. W. Williams, Jr. Authorized Representative
FURR'S/BISHOP'S, INCORPORATED
By: --------------------------------------------- E. W. Williams, Jr. Authorized Representative
[/TABLE]
S-1