etena eva vivakṣā api śabda gamyā nirākṛtā  / śabda artha asambhave hi ittham kva vivakṣā kva vā śrutiḥ // 
This same argument serves to set aside the ‘desire to speak’ as (held to be) cognised through words. when, as shown above, there can be no ‘denotation of words’, how could there be any ‘desire to speak’? Or even the word itself? 