text:
NYC IndividualEyes Custom Compact Review and Swatches |
← Annabelle Duo Eyeshadows Swatches
Back To School Series →
GLOSSette here!!! If you know me I tend to like to try out products right when I buy then so I can review em for ya`ll. This time around that was not the case but hey I still go around to it so cut me some slack. I bought the NYC palette (prolly almost a year ago) when it first same out and I found out about it from a Youtube guru Camil by the username misszxcee.
Originally there were only 3 quads. One for brown eyes (Union Square), one for blue eyes (Bryant Park), and one for green eyes (Central Park). Now they also have 3 other quads for the same eye colors but in the smokey edition.
I guess they were so popular at the time that my drugstore ran out of the brown and blue eyes quads that I ended up getting the green eyes ones. Honestly, any palette that is said to enhance eye color and make them pop… I mean its true but doesn’t mean you can’t use the other colors. The green quad looked like colors I generally used anyways (neutrally ones) so I didn’t think it was weird to pick it up. And for 5 bucks which included a primer and an illuminator (I knew I wouldn’t use it cuz I am oily skin).
It comes in quite a boxy quad. It is not as thin like other quads and trios from the drugstore but unless you are toting it around then it shouldn’t matter. It is also lightweight so if you do wanna tote it around it won’t make your makeup bag heavy. When you open it, it comes with a plastic top which labels each shadow for what it is used for (starting from the bottom shade) hightlighter, all over the lid, crease/contour, crease/contour. On the side there are primer (peachy skin tone color) and illuminator (shimmery white) which are both labeled as well. You obviously don’t have to use the shades for what it’s meant for.
When I first swatched the shadows with my finger I didn’t feel it being silky like a lot of good pigmented eyeshadows (some of which you can find at drugstores of even ELF). Since it was not silky to touch it did not swatch very pigmented at all. The darker shades are obviously more pigmented since they are darker in general. You can see in the swatches that the lighter two shades hardly show up. The sample swatches I’ve done (shown below) are swatched with a brush with the “primer” underneath it.
The shadows crease horribly when you use it with the given primer. AND the colors don’t stay put all day. I tried it with other trustworthy base/primer and the shadows creased less (still creased) and the pigmentation wore off throughout the day. My lids crease more so than others… I have Asian eyes with double lids (not mono lids) and the crease closest to the inner corners of my eyes crease A LOT!!. You may not have a creasing problem if you use a good primer and if you don’t tend to crease often. Whatever you do don’t use the given primer. I have not tested out the illuminator since I have oily skin. It could be used as a brow highlight or a cheek highlight. Creasing will not be an issue but I doubt there is any lasting power to those babies.
I don’t understand how the primer and highlight shades work. They’re the same colors for all the palettes. Primer especially, not everyone is that skintone. What about those with darker skin tones? It would work if they provided a white base cuz the would be versatile for all skintones and would also make the colors pop.
Overall, if you want a palette that can do EVERYTHING for your eyes (think about it… comes with primer and illuminator) and for 5 bucks yes considering lots of eyeshadows in drugstore have upped the price. But honestly you can find other eyeshadows that are better quality, crease less and last longer for an affordable price.
Verdit: 1/ 5 (the rating would be higher but the fact that I don’t use this palette anymore it was a waste of 5 bucks but great review for ya’ll)
This entry was posted in M- R, Makeup & Skincare, NYC, Reviews and tagged affordable, beauty, central park, cheap, cheap makeup, cosmetics, Drugstore, eyeshadow, eyeshadows, green eyes, illuminator, makeup, Makeup & Skincare, New York Color, New York Color IndividualEyes Custom Compact Review, New York Color IndividualEyes Custom Compact Review and Swatches, new york color quads, NYC, NYC Eyeshadow Review, NYC IndividualEyes Custom Compact, NYC IndividualEyes Custom Compact Review, nyc quads, primer, quads, review, reviews, swatches, \individualEyes Custom Compact. Bookmark the permalink.


text:
Rover Car and Truck Interior Parts | eBay
Rover SD1 3500 V8 Steering Wheel
Steering Wheel from a Rover SD1 3500 V8.
ROVER 75 SUNVISOR L/H SIDE 03/00-12/05 00 01 02 03 04 05
75 2000 -2005 03/00-12/05. 75 2002. Make / ModelROVER 75. L/H SIDE. Part also fits.
Range Rover P38 Console
0 bidsEnding 27 May at 11:41 AEST5d 19hLocal pickup
GOOD DRIVERS FRONT REG. 75 2000 -2005 03/00-12/05. 75 2002. Make / ModelROVER 75.
75 2000 -2005 03/00-12/05. Make / ModelROVER 75. 75 2002. Part also fits.
New listingRover P6B 3500 Front Passenger Door Scuff Plate Cover Trim #1
Complete maroon PB6 3500 to be dismantled soon. Great used condition. Light wear only.
ROVER 1983-85 3500 SD1 Vanden Plas Headliner Trim - Grey - Good Used
ROVER 1983-1985 3500 SD1 Vanden Plas Headliner Trim - Grey For car with sunroof. Hard to find item. Good Used Condition. Slight watermark on edges but material is sound. See scan for detail - sold as is. May be able to ship but would be costly due to dimensions and required packing. Freight extra. Ask.
Range Rover Classic Wingard interior mirror
ROVER 75 MASTER POWER WINDOW SWITCH 4DR SWITCH TYPE 03/00-12/05
4DR SWITCH TYPE. 75 2000 -2005 03/00-12/05. Radio codes are not supplied by Ultimate Jap. Make / ModelROVER 75. 75 2002. General Information and Conditions.
WIPER SWITCH. 75 2000 -2005 03/00-12/05. Make / ModelROVER 75. 75 2002.
LIGHT SWITCH ON DASH P/N YWC106950. 75 2000 -2005 03/00-12/05. Make / ModelROVER 75. 75 2001. We will Beat any Genuine Quote.
Rover SD1 3500 V8 Master Electric Window Switch
Master electric window switch from a Rover SD1 3500 V8. Local pick up available.
FLASHER SWITCH. 75 2000 -2005 03/00-12/05. Make / ModelROVER 75. 75 2002. General Information and Conditions.
75 2000 -2005 03/00-12/05. Radio codes are not supplied by Ultimate Jap. Make / ModelROVER 75. 75 2002. General Information and Conditions. L/H FRONT.
WIPER SWITCH. 75 2000 -2005 03/00-12/05. Make / ModelROVER 75. 75 2002. General Information and Conditions.
Rover SD1 3500 V8 Passenger/Left Front Door Interior Trim
Passenger side interior front door trim from a Rover SD1 3500 V8. Local pick up available.
Rover SD1 3500 V8 Window Wiper Switch
Window Wiper Switch from a Rover SD1 3500 V8. Local pick up available.
Range Rover P38 bonnet slam panel
P38 bonnet slam panel.
Lucas SQB175 Austin Rover 400, 412 & 420 Column Indicator Switch 231SA
Lucas SQB175 Column Light Switch, Austin Rover 400, 414, 420, Lucas 231SA. Genuine Lucas supplied in Lucas box. Indicator, Lights on Side lights, Main beam, Dip beam and headlamp flash. Fits Rover 400 414, 420 from 1994 to 1997.
Ending Today at 17:05 AEST50m 31s
window Lift engine front right Rover 75 CUH102340
P4 Series 60, 75, 80, 90, 100, 105 110 Models 1949-1964. Rover P2 Series 10, 12, 14, 16, 20 Models 1937-1948. P3 Series 60, 75 Models 1948-1949. BRAKE & CLUTCH. Brake & Clutch. Fits manual vehicles only.
Rhr rear split seat Range Rover p38 Wrecking Robs workshop @box Hill sth
0 bidsEnding Thursday at 8:59 AEST2d 16hLocal pickup
Lhf leather electric seat Range Rover p38 Used condition Robs workshop @box Hill sth
0 bidsEnding Thursday at 8:58 AEST2d 16hLocal pickup
Rhf leather electric Seat Range Rover p38 Wrecking Robs workshop @box Hill sth
75 2000 -2005 03/00-12/05. Make / ModelROVER 75. 75 2003. first if there are any issues with the item.
Range Rover P38 Front Left Electric Window Regulator
Removed from genuine 97000km vehicle. Perfect working order.
Rover 75 MGZT LH Front Door Latch New ALR9785A
Can be collected from Pickard's Automotive.
DOOR PANEL RH FRONT SUITS ROVER 75 2000 - 2005 KMJ
SUITS ROVER 75 2000 - 2005 579-1. ROVER 75 / 2003 / RH FRONT DOOR PANEL. DOOR PANEL RH FRONT.
Rover SD1 3500 V8 Centre Console
Centre console from a Rover SD1 3500 V8.
Rover SD1 3500 V8 Factory Radio Cassette Player
Factory radio cassette player from a Rover SD1 3500 V8. Local pick up available.

type: global

value: eBay Inc. ( EE-bay) is an American multinational e-commerce corporation based in San Jose, California, that facilitates consumer-to-consumer and business-to-consumer sales through its website.


text:
5speedscom | eBay
Items for sale from 5speedscom
5speedscom (4067 )
Hurst Pit Pack Competition Plus 4 Speed Clips & Hardened Tool Steel Bushings USA
SA278 Muncie 4-Speed Transmissions: How to Rebuild & Modify M20 M21 M22 Book
Muncie T10 Hurst Shifter linkage arm adapters clips bushings. 3 New FREE SHIP
Muncie M20 M21 M22 4 Speed 1st Gear Sleeve Bushing High Performance - USA made
MUNCIE TCS SWITCH PLUG - GM 8877723 AND 3906448
World Class T5 5 Speed Cluster Support Plate Mustang Camaro Cosworth Made in USA
Muncie Reverse Shift Fork M20 M21 M22 Chevy 4 speed WT297-23A MADE IN USA
Muncie 4 Speed Front Bearing Retainer French Lock Tabs Plates WT-297F NEW
12 Shift linkage rod clips for Hurst Muncie GM Ford Competition Plus Shifters
Super T10 1304084005 Manual Trans Reverse Idler Gear 16 Tooth
Super T10 Syncro Sleeve 4 speed Torque Lock Slider T10S-15 1304089006 OEM Part
BORG WARNER RICHMOND GEAR SUPER T10 MAIN CASE NEW. GM REPLACEMENT
Super T10 Borg warner Richmond Gear 1304603010 Manual Trans Detent Kit
Muncie Billet Aluminum Midplate for 63 thru 74 GM years for M20 M21 M22 USA
Reverse Idler Shaft for T10 or Super T10 T1035
Getrag GM Dodge NV3500 New Venture 5th & Reverse Slider 1993-Up WT290-15A
SsangYong Musso T5 World Class 5 Speed Transmission Mainshaft 2.9TD
EARLY T10 7/8" TRANSMISSION CLUSTER COUNTER SHAFT 3709300 T85B-3 USA NEW
T10 Super T10 Premium 1-2 Synchro Assembly Fits All GM, Ford, AMC, Studebaker
T5 5th Gear Set 55 & 25 Tooth NEW Take Off Ford Mustang T5 Motorsport Trans
1958-1962 Cast Iron Powerglide Automatic Transmission Overhaul Seal Kit FREESHIP
Borg Warner Richmond Gear SUPER T-10 4 Speed Key & Spring Kits, 2 SETS
Borg Warner Richmond Gear Super T10 Transmission 1st Gear 34 Tooth OEM USA
Borg Warner Super T10 Transmission Speedo Gear, 1304110002 8 Tooth
T10 Transmission Super T10 Reverse Idler Gear 19 Tooth OEM w/Snap Ring
NEW Speedo Gear Housing For Aluminum Powerglide Transmission Speedometer
GM Muncie Input Shaft Nut M20 M21 M22 Chevy 4 speed 591150 10 pack USA NEW
T5 & Super T10 Speedo Sleeve Housing Extra Seals & Retainer Bracket Speedometer
Richmond Gear Borg Warner Super T10 ST10 Transmission Main shaft
SKF CR 15041 Rear Seal For Muncie T10 Ford Toploader T5 and Saginaw Transmission
HURST 4 Speed Shifter Spacer Plate Comp Plus New Process Muncie Camaro 1954319
Richmond Gear ST10 1304077008 Gear, cluster gear 2.64 W ratio ST-10 4 speed NEW
T10 Super T10 Forged Premium Synchro Ring Fits all GM, Ford, AMC, Studebaker
T10 Super T10 Premium 3-4 Synchro Assembly Fits All GM, Ford, AMC, Studebaker
Super T10 1st gear Bushing Sleeve 2nd Design Borg Warner Richmond Gear OEM
Richmond Gear ST10 1304077012 Gear, cluster gear 2.88 Y ratio ST-10 4 speed
Hold Down Retainer Bracket Speedo Housing Sleeve TH350 Speedometer Turbo 350 USA
GM Muncie Input Shaft Nut M20 M21 M22 Chevy 4 speed GM591150 Made in USA
MUNCIE 4 SPEED M20 M21 M22 SYNCHRO KEY & SPRING KIT WT297-K CORRECT STYLE NEW!
MUNCIE 4 SPEED M20 M21 M22 Side Cover Pivot Pin and Clip. Made in USA
Muncie 4 Speed M20 M21 M22 Nodular Iron Mid plate . USA Made Midplate
1969 Camaro Firebird Mount Plate 195-0164B Fits 32 Spline Muncie Tail For Hurst
Muncie 4 Speed M20 M21 M22 Synchro Ring Kit Fits Years 1966-1974
Genuine Mopar Dodge Transmission Selector Gearshift Housing Shaft Seal 04505691
Vintage Car & Truck Transmission & Drivetrain (8)
Feedback rating: 4,067
Member since Sep-05-00 in United States
5SpeedsCom


text:
Episode 8162 (5th July 2013) | Coronation Street Wiki | Fandom powered by Wikia
Share	Episode 8162
Production code P694/8162
ITV transmission date 5th July 2013(Friday - Part 1)
Story associates Mark BickertonLee O'DonnellMartin SterlingKate BrooksFurquan AkhtarGareth McLean
Previous episode 3rd July 2013
Next episode 5th July 2013
Faye refuses to leave the flat as she doesn't want Anna to know that Tim is away. Owen lures her to No.6 with the promise of a big meal and no arguments. David tells Leanne he's worried about Nick's behaviour. Anna isn't satisfied with Faye's explanation of Tim being in Newcastle, especially as she's seen Jason around. Dennis is suspicious of Emily giving Norris No.3 and wonders if there's more to it than generosity. Peter discovers his car has been keyed and accuses Nick. Leanne defends Nick and tells Peter he probably did it himself. Katy asks Chesney to have Joseph so she can go out with Ryan. He refuses, saying he has plans with Sinead. Sinead is excited until she realises he only said that so Katy wouldn't treat him like he's at her beck and call. Jason tells Anna Tim has met a woman in Newcastle and he doesn't know if he's returning. Anna is furious. Gail asks David why he's being so moody. He turns on her and throws peanuts at her for a laugh. Gail is disturbed by his behaviour. Roy and Hayley have health checks. While Hayley is in the examination room, Roy changes his mind and leaves as he feels there's nothing with him. Chesney changes his mind and decides to go out with Sinead but only when he sees Katy. Tim returns. Anna goes off to have it out with him.
A nurse at the Medical Centre is uncredited although she has two lines of dialogue.
Viewing Figures: First UK broadcast: 6,260,000 viewers (12th place - both this and the next episode suffered lower than usual ratings as they were transmitted against live coverage of the Wimbledon semi-finals).
Retrieved from "http://coronationstreet.wikia.com/wiki/Episode_8162_(5th_July_2013)?oldid=236805"

value: Fandom (also known as Wikia before October 2016) is a wiki hosting service and domain operated by Fandom, Inc. (formerly known as Wikia, Inc.), a for-profit Delaware company founded in October 2004 by Jimmy Wales and Angela Beesley.


text:
Prayers Begin Here…. – SonShine's Journal — it's all about God and His Word
December 6, 2016 by gaustin00
Prayers Begin Here….
Psalm 143 “Prayers…Begin Here”
Have you ever been in a prayer group and wondered how those who pray seem like they are talking directly to God? Perhaps it is because they have spent time sitting beside David, listening to him and learning from him. David in his humility writes in Ps 45 “my tongue is as skilled as the stylus of an experienced scribe.” Can we say that? If not, let’s sit down beside David as he talks with His God.
O Lord, hear my prayer! Pay attention to my plea for help! Because of your faithfulness and justice, answer me!
Even David had the nagging notion that perhaps God was being silent for a time just as we do. But, of course, God is not but sometimes our heart fails to hear what God hears or our eyes fail to see what God sees. He is waiting for us to stop and listen for His still small voice because sometimes we are in an earthquake of emotions when our strength leaves us. Sometim es we are facing the fire and its roar. Sometimes we need the reminder that just as He was with the Three Hebrews He will be with us. Stop and ask; Is the roar is so loud your ears cannot hear? Perhaps then it is time to sit quietly as David did so we hear God’s soft whisper which is for us and us alone. In that quiet time we hear his words of lovingkindness and we hear the words of another prayer warrior; Isaiah “You will hear a word spoken behind you, saying, “This is the correct way, walk in it,” whether you are heading to the right or the left.” [Is 30:21]
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged David, in a soft whisper., isaiah, lovingkindness, not in an earthquake, not in the fire, O Lord hear my prayer, prayer begins here, stylus, tongue. Bookmark the permalink.
← A Door Was Opened….
Don’t Be Satan’s Bait! →

value: WordPress (WP, WordPress.org) is a free and open-source content management system (CMS) written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system, referred to within WordPress as Themes.


text:
Trabalhos de Product description outsourcing, Emprego | Freelancer
Product description outsourcing trabalhos
product description outsourcing
2,374 product description outsourcing trabalhos encontrados, preços em EUR
I need thousands of product description 6 dias left
...job as a virtual chat support agent for presales and customer support profile. Job Description: Attend our website’s global visitors on chat and engage in proactive conversation to know their service requirements, build trust and accordingly suggest a suitable product. Working Hours: 9:30am to 5:30pm IST Mon to Sat Qualifications: 1. Excellent command
Right now I am looking for people from India only but if you are From outside India and you find the description good enough you can also bid PLZ READ IT This is my blog you will find every related information there , PLZ READ IT CAREFULLY url OF THE BLOG [fazer login para ver a URL] If you have read all of this
Outros trabalhos relacionados com product description outsourcing
oscommerce product description , change product description length oscommerce , oscommerce product description sample , oscommerce modify product description , oscommerce extended product description , virtuemart product description character , virtuemart change add cart button product description , product description base , best product description ebay , character limit product description paypal oscommerce , oscommerce product description font color admin , product configurator outsourcing , product description joomla , oscommerce lenght product description , display product description product page virtuemart , contents product description , seo product description writer , product development outsourcing touchscreen , add product description category oscommerce , content provider product description , code product description oscommerce , product description words , virtuemart product description tabs , seo product description , osc add links product description , change product description page oscommerce , product description writing outsourcing , product description editing outsourcing

value: Freelance (sometimes spelled free-lance or free lance), freelancer, or freelance worker, are terms commonly used for a person who is self-employed and not necessarily committed to a particular employer long-term. Freelance workers are sometimes represented by a company or a temporary agency that resells freelance labor to clients; others work independently or use professional associations or websites to get work.


text:
javascript - Multiple setInterval in a HTML5 Canvas game - Game Development Stack Exchange
I'm trying to achieve multiple animations in a game that I am creating using Canvas (it is a simple ping-pong game). This is my first game and I am new to canvas but have created a few experiments before so I have a good knowledge about how canvas work.
First, take a look at the game here.
The problem is, when the ball hits the paddle, I want a burst of n particles at the point of contact but that doesn't came right. Even if I set the particles number to 1, they just keep coming from the point of contact and then hides automatically after some time. Also, I want to have the burst on every collision but it occurs on first collision only. I am pasting the code here:
//Initialize canvas
ctx = canvas.getContext("2d"),
W = window.innerWidth,
H = window.innerHeight,
ball = {},
paddles = [2],
mouse = {},
points = 0,
particlesCount = 50,
particlePos = {};
canvas.addEventListener("mousemove", trackPosition, true);
//Set it's height and width to full screen
//Function to paint canvas
function paintCanvas() {
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "source-over";
//Create two paddles
function createPaddle(pos) {
//Height and width
this.h = 10;
this.w = 100;
this.x = W/2 - this.w/2;
this.y = (pos == "top") ? 0 : H - this.h;
//Push two paddles into the paddles array
paddles.push(new createPaddle("bottom"));
paddles.push(new createPaddle("top"));
//Setting up the parameters of ball
ball = {
r: 5,
c: "white",
vx: 4,
vy: 8,
ctx.fillStyle = this.c;
ctx.arc(this.x, this.y, this.r, 0, Math.PI*2, false);
//Function for creating particles
function createParticles(x, y) {
this.radius = 0.8;
this.vx = -1.5 + Math.random()*3;
this.vy = -1.5 + Math.random()*3;
//Draw everything on canvas
paintCanvas();
for(var i = 0; i < paddles.length; i++) {
p = paddles[i];
ctx.fillRect(p.x, p.y, p.w, p.h);
//Mouse Position track
function trackPosition(e) {
mouse.x = e.pageX;
mouse.y = e.pageY;
//function to increase speed after every 5 points
function increaseSpd() {
if(points % 4 == 0) {
ball.vx += (ball.vx < 0) ? -1 : 1;
ball.vy += (ball.vy < 0) ? -2 : 2;
//function to update positions
//Move the paddles on mouse move
if(mouse.x && mouse.y) {
for(var i = 1; i < paddles.length; i++) {
p.x = mouse.x - p.w/2;
ball.x += ball.vx;
ball.y += ball.vy;
//Collision with paddles
p1 = paddles[1];
p2 = paddles[2];
if(ball.y >= p1.y - p1.h) {
if(ball.x >= p1.x && ball.x <= (p1.x - 2) + (p1.w + 2)){
ball.vy = -ball.vy;
increaseSpd();
particlePos.x = ball.x,
particlePos.y = ball.y;
else if(ball.y <= p2.y + 2*p2.h) {
if(ball.x >= p2.x && ball.x <= (p2.x - 2) + (p2.w + 2)){
//Collide with walls
if(ball.x >= W || ball.x <= 0)
ball.vx = -ball.vx;
if(ball.y > H || ball.y < 0) {
setInterval(emitParticles(particlePos.x, particlePos.y), 1000/fps);
function emitParticles(x, y) {
for(var k = 0; k < particlesCount; k++) {
particles.push(new createParticles(x, y));
counter = particles.length;
for(var j = 0; j < particles.length; j++) {
par = particles[j];
ctx.arc(par.x, par.y, par.radius, 0, Math.PI*2, false);
par.x += par.vx;
par.y += par.vy;
par.radius -= 0.02;
if(par.radius < 0) {
if(counter < 0) particles = [];
var int = setInterval(draw, 1000/fps);
Now, my function for emitting particles is on line 156, and I have called this function on line 151. The problem here can be because of I am not resetting the flag variable but I tried doing that and got more weird results. You can check that out here.
By resetting the flag variable, the problem of infinite particles gets resolved but now they only animate and appear when the ball collides with the paddles. So, I am now out of any solution.
javascript html5 canvas share|improve this question asked Jul 6 '12 at 14:26
Hey, you might wanna check out this engine I'm making: vidyadev.com/wiki/Irenic. It's still in development stage, though, but it would help you a lot.
Jul 7 '12 at 0:17
This for next loop is italising the particle every frame, this needs to be outside the function
You need to wrap an if statement around this otherwise an exception error occurs
if (par.radius > 0) {
You don't need do it like this.
// initalise particles here, see first comment above
emitParticles();
Reason for this is that you will not time your interval with the main loop which is clearing the screen which prevents you from seeing the 'sparks'
Finally, probably harmless, but to be safe, change the comma to a semi-colon here
You can see the above changes working here
share|improve this answer edited Jul 6 '12 at 23:49
answered Jul 6 '12 at 23:39
Thanks! This solved the problem :)
– Kushagra
Jul 7 '12 at 3:51
Here's the completed game: cssdeck.com/item/preview/594/…
Jul 7 '12 at 19:19
I don't see why you are putting it into a separate animation. Why not just have a main game loop and 'inject' the code into the loop? Then you can have a ParticleManager class that can handle the magnitude of created particles, etc.
I think the fact that you are putting it in a separate animation is causing issues, but is not necessarily the problem.
share|improve this answer answered Jul 6 '12 at 22:55
Double buffering on HTML5 Canvas game?
HTML5 Canvas Tileset Animation
Testing HTML5 canvas games on low resource computers

value: Stack Exchange is a network of question-and-answer (Q&A) websites on topics in diverse fields, each site covering a specific topic, where questions, answers, and users are subject to a reputation award process. The reputation system allows the sites to be self-moderating.


text:
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.raymond A. Underwood; Linda Sue Underwood, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Fluor Daniel, Incorporated; Fluor Corporation Group Healthplan; Fluor Corporation; Fluor Corporation Grouphealth Plan, Plan Administrator,defendants-appellees,andfluor Daniel, Incorporated, Group Health Plan; Fluordaniel, Incorporated, Group Health Plan Claimsreview Committee, Individually Andcollectively, Defendants, 106 F.3d 394 (4th Cir. 1997) :: Justia
Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.raymond A. Underwood; Linda Sue Underwood, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Fluor Daniel, Incorporated; Fluor Corporation Group Healthplan; Fluor Corporation; Fluor Corporation Grouphealth Plan, Plan Administrator,defendants-appellees,andfluor Daniel, Incorporated, Group Health Plan; Fluordaniel, Incorporated, Group Health Plan Claimsreview Committee, Individually Andcollectively, Defendants, 106 F.3d 394 (4th Cir. 1997)
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 106 F.3d 394 (4th Cir. 1997) Argued Sept. 25, 1996. Decided Jan. 28, 1997
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-42)
ARGUED: Roy Franklin Harmon, III, HARMON LAW FIRM, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellants.
Kristofer Karl Strasser, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, L.L.P., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
ON BRIEF: Julie M. Bondura, HARMON LAW FIRM, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina; T. Preston Reid, HOWARD, HOWARD, FRANCIS & REID, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellants. Fred W. Suggs, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, L.L.P., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before HALL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and HALLANAN, United States District Judge for the Southern District of West Virginia, sitting by designation.
Raymond A. Underwood and his wife Linda appeal the order of the district court denying their motion, made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), to amend the court's entry of judgment on behalf of defendants Fluor Corporation, Fluor Daniel, Inc., and the Fluor Corporation Group Health Plan (hereinafter, collectively, "Fluor"), in the Underwoods' action for benefits, penalties, and injunctive relief under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1145.
Specifically, the Underwoods allege that Fluor wrongly refused to pay health insurance benefits due Mrs. Underwood under the Plan, and has failed to comply with the information and notice requirements of ERISA and the COBRA1 amendments thereto. The Underwoods contend that, as a result, Fluor has breached its fiduciary duties to administer the Plan "solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries," with "care, skill, prudence, and diligence," and "in accordance with the documents and instruments governing the plan [.]" 29 U.S.C.A. 1104(a) (1) (West 1985 & Supp.1996). Moreover, according to the Underwoods, Fluor's non-compliance with the information and notice requirements has rendered it liable for the statutory penalty of up to $100 per day for each violation. See 29 U.S.C. § 1132(c) (1) (West Supp.1996).
Following a bench trial, the district court entered judgment for Fluor on all of the Underwoods' claims, and it denied the Underwoods' subsequent motion to alter or amend the judgment. We affirm the judgment of the district court with respect to its denial of benefits and injunctive relief, and with respect to its excusing Fluor from the statutory penalty for not furnishing the Underwoods with requested plan documents and other information.
We hold, however, that the district court abused its discretion by not imposing the statutory penalty for Fluor's failure to provide Mrs. Underwood with notice of her rights upon the impending termination of the health insurance benefits to which she had been entitled under the Plan. We therefore reverse that aspect of the judgment and remand for the district court to impose the appropriate penalty.
On June 29, 1992, Raymond Underwood was laid off from his engineering job with Fluor Daniel, Inc., in Greenville, South Carolina. Upon reporting for work that day, Mr. Underwood was escorted to the personnel department and given a printed notice explaining that, although he was being separated from his employment, he could elect to continue his and/or his wife's health insurance under the company's health benefits plan.2 Mr. Underwood decided to postpone his decision. He testified that he took the notice home and put it in his safe, never showing it to his wife.
Linda Underwood had been suffering from a chronic intestinal ailment since the first of the year; indeed, she had been taken to the hospital the very morning that her husband lost his job. She was released the next day, however, and Mr. Underwood quickly found employment with Sandwell Engineering in Atlanta. His new job was scheduled to begin on August 24, 1992, within the 60-day election period accorded him by the COBRA amendments. See note 2, supra. Mr. Underwood testified that he understood that there was no danger of any gap in his health insurance coverage; he also stated his belief that, in the event that he needed health benefits prior to starting work with Sandwell, he could simply elect to continue his coverage with Fluor Daniel and pay the back premiums.
Mrs. Underwood's coverage, however, was another matter; she would not be covered under Sandwell's insurance for any medical expenses related to her preexisting intestinal condition. The Underwoods testified that, as a result, they believed it necessary for her to obtain a continuation of the coverage provided by Fluor.
Fluor Daniel maintains that, during the first week of July 1992, it mailed a duplicate "COBRA notice" to Mr. Underwood, along with an election form for him to sign and return in the event that he decided to continue coverage. The Underwoods assert that they never received this mailing.3 In any case, while out of town in early August, Mr. Underwood telephoned his wife and instructed her to send a check to Fluor Daniel to continue her coverage.
Mrs. Underwood testified that she phoned Fluor Daniel's benefits department and was told by an unnamed employee to remit $679.36. The amount quoted was exactly twice the monthly rate for joint coverage, as listed on the notice handed to her husband upon his termination.4 Mrs. Underwood mailed a check for the quoted amount, dated August 10, 1992, to Fluor Daniel. On the check's memorandum line, Mrs. Underwood wrote "July & Aug. 92." A few days thereafter, Mr. Underwood submitted a completed election form to Fluor Daniel, see note 3, supra, that effectively continued coverage for both him and his wife.5 September came and went without any further payments by the Underwoods to Fluor Daniel. Mrs. Underwood continued to require medical assistance for her condition, undergoing outpatient procedures in October and November. Her situation ultimately worsened, requiring her to enter the hospital on January 2, 1993.
The following day, Mr. Underwood was told that there was a "problem" certifying his wife's admission; he contacted Fluor Daniel, which informed him that the Underwoods' insurance had been cancelled as of August 31, 1992, for non-payment of premiums. See note 4, supra.6 By telephoning Fluor's headquarters in California, Mr. Underwood was able to get his wife's admission certified by the Plan's precertification agent, and she received the surgery that she needed on January 11. In the end, however, Fluor rebuffed the Underwoods' repeated attempts to tender payment for back premiums, and it steadfastly refused to pay approximately $400,000 in medical expenses stemming from Mrs. Underwood's hospitalization and surgery.
The Underwoods filed suit in the district court, seeking to impose liability on Fluor for the costs of Mrs. Underwood's care. The complaint accused Fluor of having violated specific provisions of ERISA and its COBRA amendments by not giving the Underwoods sufficient notice of their rights to continued health insurance coverage under the Plan, and by refusing to provide Plan documents and other information they had requested. It was further alleged that Fluor's failure to comply with ERISA's notice and information requirements, along with its denial of Mrs. Underwood's insurance claims, constituted breaches of its fiduciary duties to the Underwoods.
The parties proceeded to trial before the district court, which, on August 17, 1995, entered judgment for Fluor on all of the Underwoods' claims. In so ruling, the court found that Mrs. Underwood knew she had a right to continued insurance coverage when her husband was terminated from Fluor Daniel. She knew that her husband elected COBRA coverage for her and that the premium amount had to be paid. She also knew the premium amount due. She knew the period covered by the premium amount because she wrote on her check that it was for July and August of 1992.... It is not necessary to reach the plaintiffs' complaints regarding notice because they elected and received continued insurance coverage under COBRA.... Fluor Daniel terminated the plaintiffs' coverage because the plaintiffs did not pay their premiums.
From the court's subsequent denial of their motion to amend its judgment, the Underwoods appeal.
The COBRA amendments require group health plan administrators to notify "any qualified beneficiary" of a plan participant of his right to temporarily continue his coverage upon the occurrence of certain "qualifying events" (including termination of the participant's employment) that would otherwise result in the beneficiary's loss of coverage. 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1163(2), 1166(a) (4) (A) (West Supp.1996). The participant's employer must inform the administrator of the qualifying event within 30 days of its occurrence; the administrator then has 14 more days to notify any beneficiaries and explain to them their rights. See §§ 1166(a) (2), (c). The statute plainly identifies plan beneficiaries as a discrete class entitled to certain rights apart from plan participants; we are, therefore, compelled to conclude that a plan administrator may not, merely by notifying participants of their rights, simultaneously fulfill its notice obligations to beneficiaries.
Teresa Futrell, Fluor Daniel's benefits supervisor, admitted at trial that the company never individually notified Mrs. Underwood of her rights under the COBRA amendments.7 The Underwoods seize upon this admission, urging us to impose liability on Fluor under ERISA's penalty provision, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(c), which states, in pertinent part:
Any administrator ... who fails to meet the requirements of paragraph [ (a) ](4) of section 1166 of this title ... with respect to a participant or beneficiary ... may in the court's discretion be personally liable to such participant or beneficiary in the amount of up to $100 a day from the date of such failure ..., and the court may in its discretion order such other relief as it deems proper.
29 U.S.C.A. § 1132(c) (1) (West Supp.1996). According to the Underwoods, "proper" relief in this case would include having Fluor pay for Mrs. Underwood's medical expenses.
In considering the Underwoods' argument, we find it hard to fault the logic of the court below. At the outset, we cannot say that the district court clearly erred in concluding that Mrs. Underwood knew the amount of her monthly premium and when it was due: the check that Mrs. Underwood mailed to Fluor Daniel was made out for the precise amount of two months' premiums, and Mrs. Underwood had even noted thereon the specific months for which the premiums had been paid. Mrs. Underwood's actions were entirely consistent with those of a plan beneficiary who was fully aware of her rights and responsibilities under the COBRA amendments.8 Under the district court's view of the evidence, Mrs. Underwood was aware of every fact necessary for her to continue her coverage under the Plan well beyond the time of her hospitalization and surgery. The notice provided Plan participants, had she received it, would have added nothing to her knowledge; indeed, we are constrained to point out that the Underwoods actually succeeded at the outset in continuing their coverage.
We conclude--as did the district court--that Mrs. Underwood's coverage lapsed solely because she and/or her husband simply neglected to pay the required insurance premiums; the corollary to our conclusion, of course, is that the Underwoods' coverage did not lapse as the result of any act or omission of Fluor. Inasmuch as Fluor's failure to provide Mrs. Underwood with the required notice of her COBRA rights did not cause the lapse in her coverage, it would be inequitable to hold it liable for the consequences of that lapse. Likewise, to the extent Fluor's inaction may have also been a breach of its fiduciary duty to Mrs. Underwood, the breach did not cause the lapse in coverage, and, therefore, Fluor cannot be held responsible.
On the other hand, the happenstance that Mrs. Underwood knew of her rights under the COBRA amendments did not absolve Fluor from its obligation to notify her of them; "knowledge" is not the equivalent of "notice," though the former may flow from the latter. Section 1132(c) (1), by its plain terms, accords the district court considerable discretion to impose a penalty on any plan administrator that fails to comply with the notice provisions of ERISA or the COBRA amendments. Glocker v. W.R. Grace & Co., 974 F.2d 540, 544 (4th Cir. 1992).
This discretion, however, must necessarily be confined to a determination of whether any mitigating circumstances exist to excuse the administrator's inaction. Where, as here, the violation is clear and without excuse, a penalty should be imposed, regardless of whether the plaintiff has been prejudiced. See Davis v. Featherstone, 97 F.3d 734, 738 (4th Cir. 1996) (prejudice not a prerequisite to imposing the statutory penalty). Were it otherwise, the law would not be applied with equal force to all, and justice would not be served.
Moreover, we are of the opinion that the maximum penalty of $100 per day must, as a matter of law, be imposed in this case. Fluor Corporation and its several subsidiaries employ a multitude of people; Fluor's failure to comply with COBRA's notice-to beneficiaries provision from the amendments' enactment in 1986 until at least 1993, see note 7, supra, has potentially caused substantial harm.
In addition, because " [t]he purpose of [§ 1132(c) (1) ] is not to compensate participants for injuries, but to punish noncompliance with ERISA," Faircloth v. Lundy Packing Co., 91 F.3d 648, 659 (4th Cir. 1996), petition for cert. filed, 65 U.S.L.W. 3369 (U.S. Oct. 31, 1996) (No. 96-702), the amount of the penalty must be sufficient to deter the administrator from future misconduct. Although there is evidence to suggest that Fluor is now attempting to comply with COBRA's notice provisions, see note 7, supra, we are convinced that imposition of anything less than the maximum statutory penalty would fail to suffice as an adequate deterrent.
Fluor Daniel was required to have informed the Plan Administrator of Mr. Underwood's termination within 30 days of its occurrence. Fluor Corporation (or Fluor Daniel, who appears to act as its parent company's designee in such matters) then had 14 additional days in which to provide Mrs. Underwood with notice of her rights. See Section II-A, supra. Inasmuch as Mr. Underwood was terminated on June 29, 1992, Fluor's failure to comply with the applicable notice provision rendered it in violation of the law as of August 13, 1992. Indeed, as far as we can tell, Fluor has not to this day provided Mrs. Underwood with the required notice.
Under South Carolina law, private parties must commence an action for statutory penalties or forfeitures within one year of the triggering event. See S.C.Code Ann. § 15-3-570 (Law.Co-op.1977). If we assume, for the sake of argument, that the discovery rule would apply to such actions, Mrs. Underwood's notice claim accrued, at the latest, when she discovered--or reasonably should have discovered--that she was entitled by law to receive individual notice of her rights from Fluor. Although the record does not disclose exactly when Mrs. Underwood discovered the rights secured to her by the COBRA amendments, Fluor waived any limitations defense by failing to assert it in its answer to the complaint. Anderson v. Flexel, Inc., 47 F.3d 243, 247 (7th Cir. 1995).
We need not ascertain the precise accrual date of Mrs. Underwood's claim, however, in order to fashion the appropriate penalty. Fluor's failure to provide the notice mandated by the COBRA amendments has not resulted in any continuing harm to this particular plaintiff. Principles of fairness therefore dictate that we limit the extent of Fluor's liability for the statutory penalty in this case to the limitations period--in other words, to $36,500. Were we to decide otherwise, persons subjected to ERISA or COBRA violations, where those violations are unaccompanied by continuing harm, might be disinclined to promptly pursue a remedy.
Finally, we address the Underwoods' contention that Fluor committed further violations of ERISA by not timely providing them with certain Plan documents and other information that their lawyers had requested. The materials were eventually supplied; the district court found that they had been inadvertently misdirected to Mr. Underwood's counsel in an unrelated proceeding against Fluor Daniel, and, therefore, that Fluor's technical violation of the statute was excusable. Upon reviewing the record, we are satisfied that the district court's finding was not clearly erroneous, and, therefore, that its denial of the Underwoods' motion to alter or amend was not an abuse of its discretion.
The judgment of the district court, insofar as it denies the Underwoods' claims for Plan benefits and for statutory penalties emanating from Fluor's belated disclosure of Plan documents and information, is affirmed. The judgment is reversed insofar as it denies statutory penalties to Linda Underwood emanating from Fluor's failure to notify her of her rights under the COBRA amendments. The case is remanded to the district court with instructions to enter judgment for Mrs. Underwood in the amount of $36,500. The assessment and calculation of attorney fees, if appropriate, is left to the district court.
HALLANAN, District Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part:
The notice requirements of 29 U.S.C. § 1166 state that a "group health plan shall provide, at the time of commencement of coverage under the plan, written notice to each covered employee and spouse of the employee (if any) of the rights provided under this subsection...." 29 U.S.C. § 1166 (West Supp.1996) (emphasis added). Section 1166 further reads that the administrator shall notify in the case of a qualifying event pursuant to paragraphs 1,2,4 or 6 of section 1163 of this title, any qualified beneficiary with respect to such event. 29 U.S.C. § 1166(a) (4) (A) (West Supp.1996). These qualifying events include the termination of such employee by reasons other than employee's gross misconduct. 29 U.S.C. § 1163(2) (West Supp.1996). Accordingly, each qualified beneficiary is entitled to "written notice" of their rights under COBRA upon commencement of a qualifying event.
Under the facts of the present case, Fluor freely admits that it was not their policy to send "written notice" to qualified beneficiaries at the time of Mr. Underwood's termination of employment.* Consequently, Fluor became subject to non-compliance penalties for failure to follow the plain and unambiguous language of the statute. 29 U.S.C. § 1132(c) (1) (West Supp.1996). Nevertheless, the district court, in its discretion, denied relief. The district court reasoned that Mrs. Underwood, the beneficiary under the policy, had adequate notice of her rights and obligations in spite of Fluor's failure to provide her with "written notice."
The majority opinion correctly holds that such a ruling was an abuse of discretion and properly reverses the district court's denial of non-compliance penalties. With regard to that portion of the majority opinion, I agree. I, however, cannot concur with the majority's affirmation of the district court's denial of other equitable relief. I believe that this court's affirmation of the district court, in this regard, would implicitly and incorrectly allow "constructive notice" to serve as an adequate alternative to the "written notice" requirement of the statute. My rationale for such a view is twofold.
By adopting the rationale of the majority opinion, and thereby allowing "constructive notice" to serve as an adequate alternative to a "written notice" requirement, this court will be circumventing the plain language of the statute. Consequently, an insurance provider will now be able to satisfy the requirements of the statute by either providing "written notice" to the beneficiary or by arguing, as in the present case, that the beneficiary had adequate notice of the rights and obligations under the policy. Such circumstances show that the majority opinion has implicitly added language to the statute. If Congress intends for "constructive notice" to serve as an adequate alternative for the "written notice" requirement, then let it be the entity to say so.
Secondly, the majority's holding creates an avenue for increased litigation in the district courts. By allowing "constructive notice" to serve as an adequate alternative to the statutory requirements, it may become a financially sound policy to not follow the "written notice" requirements of the statute and later litigate a "constructive notice" issue.
In the present case, Fluor would be liable for Mrs. Underwood's past due medical expenses if it were to award Mrs. Underwood coverage under the policy. However, if Fluor can persuade this court to adopt a "constructive notice" as an adequate alternative to the "written notice" requirement, it would only be subject to a fine which, arguably, would only be a small percentage of full coverage under the policy. Therefore, I believe that strict adherence to the statutory guidelines is warranted in order to avoid judicial legislating and increased litigation. Thus, in addition to reversing the district court's denial of non-compliance penalties, I would also reverse the district court's denial of other equitable relief and award Mrs. Underwood full coverage under the policy.
I respectfully dissent to the denial by this court of other equitable relief and would award full coverage under the policy.
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1161-68
Fluor Daniel, Inc., is a subsidiary of Fluor Corporation, and both are sponsors of the Fluor Corporation Group Health Plan. Fluor Corporation is the Plan Administrator. As a participant in the Plan, Mr. Underwood was entitled to hospitalization coverage and other insurance benefits; Mrs. Underwood, as her husband's beneficiary under the Plan, see 29 U.S.C. § 1002(8), qualified for the same benefits. The Plan is self-insured; claims against it are submitted to a third-party administrator for processing and payment. The Plan then reimburses the claims administrator
The notice provided to Mr. Underwood explained that, under the COBRA amendments, he could, by paying the entire premium due, continue health coverage for himself, his wife, or both for up to 18 months after his termination. See 29 U.S.C. § 1162(2). The notice quoted monthly premiums based on whether one or two persons remained insured; it clearly specified that the premiums were due at the beginning of each month and that premium notices would not be mailed. The notice also informed Mr. Underwood that premium payments would be considered timely if received within 30 days of the date due, and that he had 60 days to decide whether to continue coverage. See 29 U.S.C. §§ 1162(2) (C), 1165(1).
There is reason to believe the Underwoods' assertion. The signed election form that Mr. Underwood eventually submitted was imprinted with the Underwoods' old RFD address, which had been changed to a street designation several years previously. Mr. Underwood testified that he obtained this election form in person from Fluor Daniel's benefits department in mid-August 1992
Mrs. Underwood apparently did not effectively communicate any desire on her part to continue coverage only for herself. Absent continuation, the Underwoods' coverage would have expired on June 30, 1992. Hence, upon remittance of the quoted amount, the couple's joint coverage was continued through August 31, 1992. In order to extend the coverage beyond that date, the Underwoods would have had to pay additional premiums no later than September 30, 1992. See note 2, supra
Mr. Underwood's election of joint coverage, like his wife's remittance of the joint premium, seems to contradict the couple's stated desire to continue coverage for Mrs. Underwood only. If, perhaps, Mr. Underwood was confused, his confusion can easily be traced to the election form itself, which was poorly conceived. The form quoted only the joint premium rate, and it failed to list the entire range of available options; its designer apparently did not contemplate that an employee might elect to continue coverage only for a spouse or other dependent
Notwithstanding the supposed cessation of coverage, bills for the outpatient procedures performed on Mrs. Underwood in October and November 1992 were submitted to and paid by the third-party claims administrator. Fluor has not sought reimbursement from the Underwoods for these expenses
In 1993, Fluor amended its practice of addressing its notice mailings solely to Plan participants. Now, in cases involving married participants with spouse beneficiaries, it still mails out a single notification letter (apparently including a detailed question-and-answer pamphlet, enthusiastically entitled "Welcome to the Wonderful World of COBRA"), but it addresses the letter to both spouses. Fluor assures us that its new procedure comports with the statutory requirement. We express no opinion on the matter
We are aware that the evidence could be viewed as painting a very different picture. We might imagine that Mrs. Underwood, in light of her illness, was neither particularly willing nor fully able to take the initiative in ensuring that her Plan benefits continued uninterrupted. It is conceivable that Mrs. Underwood had never before paid for health insurance out of her own pocket, and, as a result, she did not fathom the enormous cost involved. She may well have, as she testified, simply filled out the check--including the memorandum line--in unquestioning accordance with the instructions of the benefits department, giving no thought to the meaning of the words and numbers that she recorded
The district court could have taken the above view, but it was not required to. "Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder's choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous." Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 574 (1985) (citations omitted).
Mr. Underwood was terminated for reasons other than gross misconduct

value: Justia is an American website specializing in legal information retrieval. It was founded in 2003 by Tim Stanley, formerly of FindLaw, and is one of the largest online databases of legal cases.


text:
badluckdragon comments on Lakers Magazine posted a picture of my son and I in the celebrity "faces in the crowd" section. They thought I was Zack Galifianakis.jump to contentmy subredditsannouncementsArtAskRedditaskscienceawwblogbookscreepydataisbeautifulDIYDocumentariesEarthPornexplainlikeimfiveFitnessfoodfunnyFuturologygadgetsgamingGetMotivatedgifshistoryIAmAInternetIsBeautifulJokesLifeProTipslistentothismildlyinterestingmoviesMusicnewsnosleepnottheonionOldSchoolCoolpersonalfinancephilosophyphotoshopbattlespicsscienceShowerthoughtsspacesportstelevisiontifutodayilearnedTwoXChromosomesUpliftingNewsvideosworldnewsWritingPromptsedit subscriptionsfront-all-random | television-todayilearned-philosophy-gaming-Jokes-nosleep-EarthPorn-space-AskReddit-mildlyinteresting-photoshopbattles-food-aww-movies-worldnews-Art-funny-UpliftingNews-creepy-WritingPrompts-askscience-gifs-Fitness-DIY-explainlikeimfive-Showerthoughts-Music-sports-Documentaries-videos-books-InternetIsBeautiful-pics-OldSchoolCool-tifu-personalfinance-nottheonion-Futurology-TwoXChromosomes-news-history-dataisbeautiful-LifeProTips-listentothis-gadgets-GetMotivated-science-IAmAmore » nbacommentsrelatedother discussions (2)want to join? login or register in seconds|Englishlimit my search to /r/nbause the following search parameters to narrow your results:subreddit:subredditfind submissions in "subreddit"author:usernamefind submissions by "username"site:example.comfind submissions from "example.com"url:textsearch for "text" in urlselftext:textsearch for "text" in self post contentsself:yes (or self:no)include (or exclude) self postsnsfw:yes (or nsfw:no)include (or exclude) results marked as NSFWe.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dogsee the search faq for details.advanced search: by author, subreddit...this post was submitted on 07 Apr 20143,973 points (95% upvoted)shortlink: remember mereset passwordloginSubmit a new postSubmit a new postnbasubscribeunsubscribe210,781 readers2,272 users here nowAnnouncements: 2014 OffSeason Signings | 2014 OffSeason Trades | /r/NBA official twitter - @NBA_Reddit
a community for 5 yearsmessage the moderatorsMODERATORSUSAfidlerTyson ChandlerheroinheroHeatcatmoonBullspiglet24Steven AdamsWiggles420[WAS] Bradley Bealcaindaddy[GSW] Stephen Curryswollencornholio[NOH] Predrag StojakovićLieutenantKumar[NBA] Adam SilverNBA_MOD[MIL] Jabari Parkeriamtheraptor...and 8 more »397239733974Lakers Magazine posted a picture of my son and I in the celebrity "faces in the crowd" section. They thought I was Zack Galifianakis. (imgur.com)submitted 5 months ago by ClippersBushmaster805581 commentssharecancelloading...sorted by: bestbesttopnewhotcontroversialoldrandomyou are viewing a single comment's thread.view the rest of the comments →[–]badluckdragon 1 point2 points3 points 5 months ago (0 children)Quick someone get that idea to Sutter before the season starts. permalinkparentaboutblogaboutteamsource codeadvertisejobshelpwikiFAQreddiquetterulescontact ustoolsmobilefirefox extensionchrome extensionbuttonswidget<3reddit goldstoreredditgiftsreddit.tvradio redditUse of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement {Genitive} and Privacy Policy {Genitive}. © 2014 reddit inc. All rights reserved.REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.close this windowyou'll need to login or register to do thatcreate a new accountall it takes is a username and passwordprivacy philosophy
username:try anotheravailable!account recovery email: (optional)we only send email at your requestpassword:verify password:remember mecreate accountis it really that easy? only one way to find out...loginalready have an account and just want to login?username:password:remember merecover passwordloginclose this windowinterface languageEnglish [en]العربية [ar]Беларуская мова [be]български език [bg]Bosanski [bs]català [ca]česky [cs]dansk [da]Deutsch [de]Ελληνικά [el]English (Australia) [en-au]English (Canadian) [en-ca]English (Great Britain) [en-gb]English [en-us]Esperanto [eo]español [es]español [es-ar]eesti keel [et]Euskara [eu]فارسی [fa]suomi [fi]français [fr]Gàidhlig [gd]עברית [he]मानक हिन्दी [hi]hrvatski [hr]Magyar [hu]Հայերեն լեզու [hy]Bahasa Indonesia [id]íslenska [is] (*)italiano (Italy) [it]日本語 [ja]ಕನ್ನಡ [kn_IN]한국어 [ko]Latin [la]1337 [leet]LOL [lol]lietuvių kalba [lt]latviešu valoda [lv]Nederlands [nl]Nynorsk [nn]Norsk [no]Arrrrrrrr! [pir]polski [pl]português [pt] (*)português [pt-pt]português brasileiro [pt_BR]română [ro]русский [ru]slovenčina [sk]slovenščina [sl]српски језик [sr]Srpski [sr-la]Svenska [sv]தமிழ் [ta]ภาษาไทย [th]Türkçe [tr]українська мова [uk]Tiếng Việt [vi]中文 [zh] (*) incomplete volunteer to translateπ Rendered by PID 15139 on app-79 at 2014-09-18 00:14:03.734807+00:00 running eabe34e country code: US.

value: Reddit (, stylized as reddit) is an American social news aggregation, web content rating, and discussion website. Registered members submit content to the site such as links, text posts, images, and videos, which are then voted up or down by other members.


text:
Hoist House Restaurant at Swiftwater Cellars, Cle Elum - Menu, Prices & Restaurant Reviews - TripAdvisor
Hoist House Restaurant at Swiftwater Cellars, Cle Elum
All Cle Elum Restaurants Restaurants near Hoist House Restaurant at Swiftwater Cellars
All things to do in Cle Elum Things to do near Hoist House Restaurant at Swiftwater Cellars
Search United States›Washington (WA)›Cle Elum›Cle Elum Restaurants›Hoist House Restaurant at Swiftwater Cellars
#3 of 32 Restaurants in Cle Elum Certificate of Excellence ££ - £££
Also show MapSatellite Map updates are paused. Zoom in to see updated info. Reset zoom Updating Map... Return to Map Get directions 301 Rope Rider Dr, Cle Elum, WA 98922-8690 (Suncadia Drive) +1 509-674-6555
Find a table Update Search available times for this restaurant Hoist House Restaurant at Swiftwater Cellars is not available for your requested time. Choose another time, or search restaurants with availability.
reviews Clear all Start your review of Hoist House Restaurant at Swiftwater Cellars Click to rate
12 helpful votes “Mother's Day Brunch par excellence!”
NEW We were a group of 8, 6 adults and 2 children. It is a huge facility - the location and the building are very rustic with many vestiges of the mining industry: mine shafts, photographs, a mining car and miners' work equipment. There was a large variety of food to enjoy: meats, salmon, unique salads, many breakfast items, vegetables and...
More Helpful? Thank skal_1110 Report 1Sunbumm
A must restaurant experience when visiting Suncadia Resort...BUT make sure you have reservations at least 2 weeks in advance on weekend evenings for dinner. Delicious food. Fun staff. Great ambiance. Will return again.
Helpful? Thank 1Sunbumm Report biztraveler57
37 helpful votes “Lovely View Undermined by Lousy, Unprofessional Service, Ok Food”
We made advance reservations for a group celebrating my daughter's graduation, spoke twice with the concierge and with the hostesses. On the day of the event, we arrived and the restaurant was not ready, didn't know our name, and had to scramble around to set up for our party of 14. Once they were ready, after waiting 15-20 minutes, we...
More Helpful? Thank biztraveler57 Report RexTak
35 helpful votes “Excellent service, great food and nice view!”
My wife wanted to see the snow, so we drove up to Suncadia just to see the snow and have lunch up there. We hadn't tried the Hoist House Restaurant yet, so we decided to give it a try. You'll be walking on snow from the parking area to the just outside the front entrance, so wear appropriate shoes or...
Thank RexTak Report Spar85
20 helpful votes “Great Time!”
We loved the atmosphere and the vibrance here. Happy people, great food and wine, good service. Everyone quite helpful, and plenty of options for eating here - a diverse menu plus you can eat at a table, the "kitchen bar", the bar, or the lounge area.
Helpful? Thank Spar85 Report Kandersonrdh
Level Contributor 3 reviews “Christmas celebration”
Our server Trevor was amazing! He kept everything running very smoothly for our party of 12 for a Christmas celebration. The food was delicious and wine recommendations were right on! We thought being put in the banquet room for large tables might feel out of the way but it wasn't at all - beautifully decorated and nice to have some...
More Helpful? Thank Kandersonrdh Report Sally D
28 helpful votes “Great Place to Eat if You're Not in a Hurry”
The Hoist House is the perfect place to eat after some sledding fun on the HUGE hill behind them. The place was packed but the food and service were both wonderful. It took at least 30 minutes to get our food once seated, but the hostess brought our kids some fries to help ease the wait.
Helpful? Thank Sally D Report Doug N
2 reviews “Amazing Steelhead!”
Everytime we are at Suncadia, we also go to the Winery once or twice. This is a great restaurant with the best food around. The steelhead is amazing and large enough to split for two.
Helpful? Thank Doug N Report TacomaPuffin
2 helpful votes “Memorable Thanksgiving Dinner”
This was our third Thanksgiving at Suncadia but we made our dinner reservations at the Hoist House to try something different.
Dinner couldn't have been better. While it was a buffet the service was terrific! Our adult family of five felt welcomed; our server got a wonderful picture of us at the table. She was very prompt and helpful but...
More Helpful? Thank TacomaPuffin Report Rattlhed
2 helpful votes “Great Atmosphere, friendly staff, and outstanding food”
This is our second time eating at the Swiftwater. We did this a couple years ago, and it was fun to be back. We started our evening with wine tasting at the Swiftwater bar. Their wines are hit and miss to me. We shared 2 tastings of different flights. My wife's flight had 3 wines, and mine had for. The...
More Helpful? Thank Rattlhed Report Previous
Updating list... Travellers who viewed Hoist House Restaurant at Swiftwater Cellars also viewed
Cle Elum, WA Canary Lounge Inn at Suncadia Resort
Been to Hoist House Restaurant at Swiftwater Cellars? Share your experiences! Write a Review
301 Rope Rider Dr, Cle Elum, WA 98922-8690 (Suncadia Drive) Location:
Description Swiftwater Cellars is nestled on the historic Roslyn No. 9 Coal Mine in the heart of the Cascade Mountains. Its unique location within a renowned resort makes it a destination within a destination offering premium Swiftwater Cellars’ wines and Pacific Northwest cuisine, mountain outlooks, championship golf and private dark sky observation. Swiftwater Cellars is the focal point of Northwest living with European style. It provides you with a natural sense of mountain elegance and is ideal for weddings or private parties, a venue to reinvent the team spirit of your business or simply, a home away from home to renew in the comforts of fresh air and outdoor activities. Swiftwater Cellars saddles the Cascade Mountains along the Interstate 90 corridor being the ideal location for a quick one hour plus drive from Seattle or the place to stop on the way to the other side of the state. The Swiftwater family looks forward to your visit and we ensure you and your guests the opportunity to take part in all the Northwest has to offer.
Questions? Get answers from Hoist House Restaurant at Swiftwater Cellars staff and past visitors.
Posting guidelines Get notified about new answers to your questions. Ask Typical questions asked: Do you have gluten-free options? Is there a dress code? Do you allow dogs on the outdoor patio? Near Hoist House Restaurant at Swiftwater Cellars Top-rated Attractions Nearby 111 Reviews Swiftwater Cellars
17 Reviews Snoqualmie Pass Train Tunnel
Browse all attractions Top-rated Restaurants Nearby 13 Reviews Basecamp Books and Bites
9 Reviews Roots BBQ
5 Reviews Carek's Meat Market

value: Tripadvisor, Inc. is an American online travel company that operates a website and mobile app with user-generated content and a comparison shopping website.


text:
BBC Radio 7 - The Radio Detectives, Series 2, A Case for Dr Morelle The BBC has updated its cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites if you visit a page which contains embedded content from social media. Such third party cookies may track your use of the BBC website. We and our partners also use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the BBC website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Continue Change settings Find out more ]]> Accessibility links Skip to content Accessibility Help BBC iD Notifications
Sorry, this episode is not currently available on BBC iPlayer Radio A Case for Dr Morelle The Radio Detectives, Series 2 Episode 4 of 5 Professor Jeffrey Richards investigates how the London Harley Street psychiatrist-turned-detective solved his cases. Add Release date: 15 July 2008 30 minutes Last on Sun 29 Aug 2010 05:00 BBC Radio 7 More episodes Previous The Wisdom of Miss Marple — Series 2 View Programme information Next On the Beat with PC 49 — Series 2 View Programme information See all episodes from The Radio Detectives Broadcasts See all broadcasts of A Case for Dr Morelle (10) You may also like View all Similar programmes By genre: Factual > Arts, Culture & the Media By format: Documentaries Home {{/each}}

value: The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is the national broadcaster of the United Kingdom. Headquartered at Broadcasting House in  London, it is the world's oldest national broadcaster, and the largest broadcaster in the world by number of employees, employing over 22,000 staff in total, of whom approximately 19,000 are in public-sector broadcasting.


text:
The best Gutenberg ‘utility’
“Page Builder Gutenberg Blocks – CoBlocks” has been translated into 5 locales. Thank you to the translators for their contributions.
English (US), German, Japanese, Russian, Spanish (Spain), and Ukrainian.


text:
AUPQ130999A0 - A method and apparatus (IJ47V11) - Google Patents
A method and apparatus (IJ47V11)
AUPQ130999A0
AUPQ130999A0 AUPQ1309A AUPQ130999A AUPQ130999A0 AU PQ130999 A0 AUPQ130999 A0 AU PQ130999A0 AU PQ1309 A AUPQ1309 A AU PQ1309A AU PQ130999 A AUPQ130999 A AU PQ130999A AU PQ130999 A0 AUPQ130999 A0 AU PQ130999A0
ij47v11
AUPQ1309A
1999-07-22 Publication of AUPQ130999A0 publication Critical patent/AUPQ130999A0/en
2000-05-23 Priority claimed from US09/575,177 external-priority patent/US6382779B1/en
2000-05-24 Priority claimed from AU47320/00A external-priority patent/AU761670B2/en
2000-05-24 Priority claimed from AU47317/00A external-priority patent/AU766416B2/en
2000-05-24 Priority claimed from PCT/AU2000/000585 external-priority patent/WO2001002179A1/en
2000-05-24 Priority claimed from AU47321/00A external-priority patent/AU761821B2/en
2000-05-24 Priority claimed from AU47319/00A external-priority patent/AU761820B2/en
2004-01-15 Priority claimed from AU2004200135A external-priority patent/AU2004200135B2/en
AUPQ1309A 1999-06-30 1999-06-30 A method and apparatus (IJ47V11) Abandoned AUPQ130999A0 (en)
US09/575,151 US6322194B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-23 Calibrating a micro electro-mechanical device
US09/575,190 US6540319B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-23 Movement sensor in a micro electro-mechanical device
US09/575,177 US6382779B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-23 Testing a micro electro- mechanical device
US09/575,175 US6629745B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-23 Fault detection in a micro electro-mechanical device
AT00929097T AT400436T (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 device test of a microelectromechanical
PCT/AU2000/000586 WO2001002180A1 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Fault detection in a micro electro-mechanical device
AU47320/00A AU761670B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Testing a micro electro-mechanical device
DE2000639436 DE60039436D1 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 device test of a microelectromechanical
CA 2414734 CA2414734C (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Fault detection in a micro electro-mechanical device
AU47317/00A AU766416B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Movement sensor in a micro electro-mechanical device
DE2000625227 DE60025227D1 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Motion sensor in a micro-electro-mechanical component-
DE2000641193 DE60041193D1 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 device calibration of a microelectromechanical
EP20000929094 EP1214271B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Movement sensor in a micro electro-mechanical device
PCT/AU2000/000585 WO2001002179A1 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Testing a micro electro-mechanical device
PCT/AU2000/000582 WO2001002289A1 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Movement sensor in a micro electro-mechanical device
EP20000929098 EP1206352B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Fault detection in a micro electro-mechanical device
CA 2414732 CA2414732C (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Calibrating a micro electro-mechanical device
AU47321/00A AU761821B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Fault detection in a micro electro-mechanical device
BR0011991A BR0011991A (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 fault detection in a micro-electromechanical device
CA 2414733 CA2414733C (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Testing a micro electro-mechanical device
CA 2414741 CA2414741C (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Movement sensor in a micro electro-mechanical device
MXPA02000179A MXPA02000179A (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Fault detection in a micro electro-mechanical device.
AU47319/00A AU761820B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Calibrating a micro electro-mechanical device
JP2001507647A JP4388251B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Failure detection method of the microelectromechanical system
EP20000929096 EP1200264B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Calibrating a micro electro-mechanical device
IL14735700A IL147357D0 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Fault detection in a micro electro-mechanical device
AT00929094T AT314306T (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Motion sensor in a micro-electro-mechanical component-
EP20000929097 EP1206351B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 Testing a micro electro-mechanical device
AT00929096T AT418454T (en) 1999-06-30 2000-05-24 device calibration of a microelectromechanical
ZA200200767A ZA200200767B (en) 1999-06-30 2002-01-29 Movement sensor in a micro electro-mechanical device.
US10/303,350 US6733104B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2002-11-23 Micro mechanical device fault detection
US10/636,257 US6997534B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2003-08-08 Detecting faults in a micro electro mechanical device utilising a single current pulse
US10/636,273 US6802587B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2003-08-08 Micro electro-mechanical device having an integrated movement sensor
AU2004200135A AU2004200135B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2004-01-15 Movement sensor in a micro electro-mechanical device
US10/841,571 US6890052B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2004-05-10 Under actuation detection in a micro electromechanical device
US10/841,504 US6811242B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2004-05-10 Fault detection in a micro mechanical device
US10/841,572 US7021747B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2004-05-10 Method of removing a blockage in a micro electronmechanical device
US10/841,512 US6929345B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2004-05-10 Testing for correct operation of micro electromechanical device
US10/841,534 US6921145B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2004-05-10 Over actuation detection in a micro electromechanical device
US10/949,346 US6969142B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2004-09-27 Method of detecting a fault condition in a micro-electromechanical device
US10/949,356 US6910755B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2004-09-27 Micro-electromechanical fluid ejection device having an integrated movement sensor
US10/963,559 US6997537B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2004-10-14 Method of detecting a fault in a micro-electromechanical device
US10/968,121 US7004567B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2004-10-20 Micro-electromechanical device with built-in fault detection
IL16495704A IL164957A (en) 1999-06-30 2004-11-01 Micro electro-mechanical device having an integrated movement sensor
US11/001,025 US7210759B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2004-12-02 Testing regime for a micro-electromechanical device
US11/030,875 US7163276B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2005-01-10 Testing of a micro-electromechanical device for under actuation
US11/124,348 US7328977B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2005-05-09 Inkjet printhead with micro-electromechanical fluid ejection devices having integrated movement sensors
US11/144,806 US7025436B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2005-06-06 Method of detecting a blockage within an inkjet nozzle
US11/155,634 US7093920B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2005-06-20 Method of detecting over-actuation of MEM device
US11/165,198 US7128093B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2005-06-24 MEMS fluid ejection device configured for detecting a fault condition
US11/231,857 US7093921B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2005-09-22 Micro-electromechanical actuating mechanism with built-in test circuit
US11/250,457 US7147297B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2005-10-17 Ink jet nozzle arrangement that incorporates a movement sensor
US11/339,493 US7210666B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2006-01-26 Fluid ejection device with inner and outer arms
US11/485,255 US7467842B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2006-07-13 Ink jet nozzle assembly with over-actuation detection
US11/585,964 US7325901B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2006-10-25 Ink jet nozzle arrangement incorporating mechanically coupled bend actuator arms
US11/635,535 US7465011B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2006-12-08 Thermal bend actuator arrangement with a diagnostic sensor
US11/730,786 US7635177B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2007-04-04 Inkjet nozzle device with cantilevered actuating arm
US11/730,785 US7661795B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2007-04-04 Inkjet nozzle device with static and movable nozzle portions
US11/951,940 US7470005B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2007-12-06 Nozzle arrangement with a movement sensor for an inkjet printer
US11/961,662 US7802873B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2007-12-20 Nozzle arrangement with a movement sensor for an inkjet printer
US12/276,360 US7669977B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2008-11-23 Nozzle device with expansive chamber-defining layer
US12/277,293 US7695092B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2008-11-24 Nozzle device with movement sensor
US12/324,725 US7703875B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2008-11-26 Printing nozzle arrangement having movement sensor
US12/626,930 US20100073429A1 (en) 1999-06-30 2009-11-29 Inkjet Nozzle Device With Cantilevered Actuating Arm
US12/702,157 US20100134565A1 (en) 1999-06-30 2010-02-08 Inkjet Nozzle Device With Static And Movable Nozzle Chamber Portions
US12/702,192 US20100141710A1 (en) 1999-06-30 2010-02-08 Nozzle Device With Expansive Chamber-Defining Layer
US12/750,610 US7980661B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2010-03-30 Nozzle device incorporating movement sensor
US12/765,757 US7938514B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2010-04-22 Printing nozzle having fault sensor
US13/078,998 US8038252B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2011-04-03 Method of detecting MEM device faults with single current pulse
US13/252,187 US8317301B2 (en) 1999-06-30 2011-10-03 Printing nozzle arrangement having fault detector
AUPQ130999A0 true AUPQ130999A0 (en) 1999-07-22
AUPQ1309A Abandoned AUPQ130999A0 (en) 1999-06-30 1999-06-30 A method and apparatus (IJ47V11)
US (41) US6629745B1 (en)
EP (3) EP1200264B1 (en)
CN (4) CN1319740C (en)
AT (3) AT314306T (en)
CA (4) CA2414734C (en)
DE (3) DE60039436D1 (en)
Ref document number: 4731700
Ref document number: 4731900
Ref document number: 4732100
Ref document number: 4732000

value: Google Patents is a search engine from Google that indexes patents and patent applications.


text:
Words that start with freeswitc | Words starting with freeswitc
Words that start with freeswitc | Words starting with freeswitc http://www.thefreedictionary.com/words-that-start-with-freeswitcPrinter Friendly
9,843,008,251 visitors served
Words that start with freeswitc
Found 1 words that start with freeswitc. Browse our Scrabble Word Finder, Words With Friends cheat dictionary, and WordHub word solver to find words starting with freeswitc. Or use our Unscramble word solver to find your best possible play! Related: Words containing freeswitc
10-letter words that start with freeswitcSee also10-letter words that start with freeswitcfreeswitchSee also:2-letter words with QWords that start with wWords with the letter qWords that start with lWords that end in jWords that start with aWords that start with freeswit

value: The Free Dictionary is an American online dictionary and encyclopedia that aggregates information from various sources.


text:
life law luck: Simple Banana Bread.
In a perfect world, I would have chocolate chip banana bread every single day. Seriously.
As luck would have it, we ended up with a ton of bananas that were going ripe a little too fast. What's a girl to do? Make banana bread.
I was getting a little tired of my old go-to recipe. It called for applesauce instead of butter, but you know, you just don't always have applesauce on hand. I needed a simpler recipe. Enter Simply Recipes.
Elise's Banana Bread recipe looked like just what I needed: minimum ingredients that I already have on hand and easy no-fuss preparation. Plus, it's tried and true, handed down through friends and family. Perfect.
I made it just like she said except I added a pinch of cinnamon. Everything just tastes a bit better with cinnamon, don't you think?
1 tsp cinnamon (I might make it 1 Tbsp next time)
1 1/2 cups of flour (all-purpose or GF all-purpose)
Preheat oven to 350. Mix butter and mashed bananas together. Add sugar, egg, and vanilla. Mix in baking soda, cinnamon, and salt. Last, add the flour. Mix well. Pour into a 8 or 9 inch bread pan. Bake for 1 hour. Recipe makes one loaf.
One note: While you don't need a mixer for this recipe, I did use mine to beat the bananas smooth. We like our bread without tons of fruit chunks.
It turned out great! K gave it his stamp of approval so I know it's a winner. I'm going to make a GF version tomorrow so I can enjoy it too! And I just might add some chocolate chips...
Do you have a go to Banana Bread recipe?
Posted by Alex @ life. law. luck. at 6:39 PM

value: Blogger is an American online content management system (CMS) which enables multi-user blogs with time-stamped entries. Pyra Labs developed it before being acquired by Google in 2003.


text:
Words containing lteachin | Words that contain lteachin
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/words-containing-lteachin
Dictionary, Encyclopedia and Thesaurus - The Free Dictionary 10,212,988,153 visitors served
Found 1 words containing lteachin. Browse our Scrabble Word Finder, Words With Friends cheat dictionary, and WordHub word solver to find words that contain lteachin. Or use our Unscramble word solver to find your best possible play!
14 letter words containing lteachinSee also
14 letter words containing lteachin


text:
Don v. OneBeacon Insurance Group, LLC et al 3:2018cv00292 | US District Court for the District of Alaska | Justia
Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Alaska District Court Don v. OneBeacon Insurance Group, LLC et al
Don v. OneBeacon Insurance Group, LLC et al
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company and OneBeacon Insurance Group, LLC
February 8, 2019 Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants shall file their response to the complaint by 2/15/19. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
February 7, 2019 Filing 12 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer UNOPPOSED by Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, OneBeacon Insurance Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Guadagno, Michael)
January 31, 2019 Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The defendants shall file their response to the complaint by 2/8/19. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
January 30, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer UNOPPOSED by Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, OneBeacon Insurance Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Guadagno, Michael)
January 17, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Lodging Proof of Service by Wayne Don (Fortier, Samuel)
January 14, 2019 Filing 8 INITIAL CASE STATUS REPORT/CASE SCHEDULING AND PLANNING ORDER: Counsel for plaintiff shall serve and file the Rule 26 Meeting Report by 2/19/19. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
January 11, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A. Guadagno on behalf of Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, OneBeacon Insurance Group, LLC (Guadagno, Michael)
January 3, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF LODGING by Wayne Don (Fortier, Samuel)
January 3, 2019 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Wayne Don (Fortier, Samuel)
December 31, 2018 Filing 4 ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS: Advising counsel of the procedure to follow prior to filing a Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 12/31/18. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
December 14, 2018 Summons Issued as to Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, OneBeacon Insurance Group, LLC. (PXS, COURT STAFF)
December 14, 2018 Filing 3 Unissued summons re Defendant OneBeacon Insurance Group, LLC, (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant Specialty Insurance Company)(PXS, COURT STAFF)
December 13, 2018 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (PXS, COURT STAFF)
December 13, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, OneBeacon Insurance Group, LLC (Filing fee $400/Receipt #ANC015243.), filed by Wayne Don. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(PXS, COURT STAFF)
Search for this case: Don v. OneBeacon Insurance Group, LLC et al
Defendant: OneBeacon Insurance Group, LLC
Plaintiff: Wayne Don


text:
House of HollandEdit
The first count of Holland, Dirk I, was the son or foster-son of Gerolf, Count in Frisia (Dijkstra suggests that Dirk may have been the son of a sister of Gerolf and that his own father died while he was still an infant). He received land around Egmond from Charles the Fat at a place called Bladella (modern day Bladel near Eindhoven, The Netherlands) in 922. This is seen as the beginning of the county of Holland. However, until about 1100, the usual names for the county were West-Friesland, Frisia or Kennemerland; in spite of this the counts from Dirk I onwards are traditionally named of Holland.
1061–1091
1091–1121
with Louis I
24 June 1210
(1345–1354)
The County of Holland and West Frisia 1582–1795Edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Count_of_Holland&oldid=857069710"
Last edited on 29 August 2018, at 10:49

value: Wikipedia ( (listen) wik-ih-PEE-dee-ə or  (listen) wik-ee-) is a free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers through a model of open collaboration, using a wiki-based editing system. Individual contributors, also called editors, are known as Wikipedians.


text:
BBC Sport - London 2012 Olympics - Mhairi Spence : Great Britain & N. Ireland, Modern Pentathlon For a better experience on your device, try our mobile site. The BBC has updated its cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites if you visit a page which contains embedded content from social media. Such third party cookies may track your use of the BBC website. We and our partners also use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the BBC website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Continue Find out more ]]> Accessibility links Skip to content Skip to local navigation Accessibility Help BBC navigation News Sport Weather Shop Earth Travel Capital Culture More… Search term: Olympics Home Football Formula 1 Cricket Rugby U Rugby L Tennis Golf London 2012 More Sports American Football Archery Athletics Badminton Baseball Basketball Bowls Boxing Canoeing Cycling Darts Disability Sport Diving Equestrian Fencing Gaelic Games Gymnastics Handball Hockey Horse Racing Ice Hockey Judo Modern Pentathlon MotoGP Netball Rowing Sailing Shooting Snooker Squash Swimming Table Tennis Taekwondo Triathlon Volleyball Weightlifting Winter Sports Wrestling You are in Countries Team GB Mhairi Spence Schedule & Results Medals Olympic Sports Archery Athletics Badminton Basketball Beach Volleyball Boxing Canoe Slalom Canoe Sprint Cycling - BMX Cycling - Mountain Bike Cycling - Road Cycling - Track Diving Equestrian Fencing Football Gymnastics - Artistic Gymnastics - Rhythmic Gymnastics - Trampoline Handball Hockey Judo Modern Pentathlon Rowing Sailing Shooting Swimming Synchronised Swimming Table Tennis Taekwondo Tennis Triathlon Volleyball Water Polo Weightlifting Wrestling Share this page Information on this page will not be updated. Facts were accurate as of August 13, 2012. Mhairi Spence One to watch Key Facts Country Great Britain & N. Ireland Competed in MODERN PENTATHLON Women's Modern Pentathlon Date of birth 31 Aug 1985 Height 1.71m Weight 71kg Mhairi on Facebook Mhairi on Twitter Medals London 2012 0 0 0 Sport Guides
MODERN PENTATHLON Subscribe Latest Headlines Murray wins Britain's 65th medal Samantha Murray won GB's 65th and final medal of the London 2012 Olympic Games with modern pentathlon silver. 29 Nov 12 Murray and Spence in medal hunt Women's Modern Pentathlon 12 Aug 12 Britain's Samantha Murray and Mhairi Spence are second and ninth after two events of the modern pentathlon. All to play for at Worlds - Cook Women's Modern Pentathlon 7 May 12 Britain's modern pentathletes face a battle for an Olympic place in this week's World Championships says Stephanie Cook. Results for Mhairi Spence Date Event Rank Mark 12 Aug Women's Modern Pentathlon Running / Shooting 28 1936 12 Aug Women's Modern Pentathlon Riding 25 1096 12 Aug Women's Modern Pentathlon Swimming 10 1164 1 Jan Women's Modern Pentathlon Fencing 11 856 Head to Head Mhairi Spence vs Samantha Murray Select a different athlete to compare Laura Asadauskaite (LTU) Amélie Cazé (FRA) Claudia Cesarini (ITA) Qian Chen (CHN) Elodie Clouvel (FRA) Natalya Coyle (IRL) Sabrina Crognale (ITA) Natalie Dianova (CZE) Chloe Esposito (AUS) Sylwia Gawlikowska (POL) Evdokia Gretchichnikova (RUS) Margaux Isaksen (USA) Iryna Khokhlova (UKR) Ekaterina Khuraskina (RUS) Sarolta Kovacs (HUN) Narumi Kurosu (JPN) Yane Marques (BRA) Melanie Mccann (CAN) Aya Medany (EGY) Yihua Miao (CHN) Samantha Murray (GBR) Anastasiya Prokopenko (BLR) Elena Rublevska (LAT) Laura Salminen (FIN) Annika Schleu (GER) Lena Schöneborn (GER) Suzanne Stettinius (USA) Viktoriya Tereshchuk (UKR) Adrienn Toth (HUN) Donna Vakalis (CAN) Hanna Vasilionak (BLR) Tamara Vega (MEX) Gintare Venckauskaite (LTU) Katarzyna Wojcik (POL) Shino Yamanaka (JPN) Soo Jin Yang (KOR) Mhairi Spence One to watch London 2012 medals 0 London 2012 appearances 4 London 2012 results (pts) 1936 Women's Modern Pentathlon Height 1.71m (5'7") Weight 71kg Age 30 Samantha Murray London 2012 medals 1 London 2012 appearances 4 London 2012 results (pts) 2120 Women's Modern Pentathlon Height 1.74m (5'9") Weight 59kg Age 26 View the London 2012 medallist table Medal Table
More Athletes from Team GB Lizzie Armitstead Cycling - Road Grace Carter Volleyball Jessica Clarke Football All Athletes from Team GB Team GB Learn more about the athletes representing Great Britain and Northern Ireland in the 2012 Olympic Games, and catch up on the latest news and gossip surrounding Team GB Meet Team GB Advertising Partners


text:
Restoration of Former Military Academy Cadets (1914) by United States Congress - New, Rare & Used Books Online at Alibris Marketplace
Books Literary Collections Restoration of Former Military Academy Cadets (1914)
Restoration of Former Military Academy Cadets (1914) by
All from $14.41
Used from $14.41
9781104375010
9781165645961
9781161935745
9781169589438
110437501X
12243000642
12151935067
Fine. Trade paperback (US). Glued binding. 44 p. Contains: Illustrations, color.
1165645963
12281843248
1161935746
12298929628
New. Sewn binding. Cloth over boards. 42 p.
12298719690
Fine. Sewn binding. Cloth over boards. 42 p.
116958943X
11514368721
11512704079
12592458918
Good. 116958943X Up for sale is a used book in good condition. This book has been previously owned and is blemished. The cover has some rubbing with corner and binding wear. The interior has page markings (highlighting/writing) and the previous owner's name. There is an inventory sticker on the back and a used sticker on the spine. The textblock has a marking.
ISBN-13: 9781169589438
ISBN-13: 9781161935745
ISBN-13: 9781165645961
ISBN-13: 9781104375010
All Editions of Restoration of Former Military Academy Cadets (1914) 2010, Hardcover
Starting at $2.49	Memorial Addresses on the Life and Character of Michael P. O'Connor (a Representative from South Carolina), Delivered in the House of Representatives and in the Senate - Primary Source Edition
Starting at $13.20	See More
Addresses on the Presentation of the Sword of Gen. Andrew Jackson to the Congress of the United States, Delivered in the Senate and House of Representatives, February 26, 1855
Starting at $3.40	Memorial Addresses on the Life and Character of Andrew Johnson, a Senator from Tennessee, Delivered in the Senate and House of Representatives
Starting at $17.23	William F. Mahoney: Memorial Addresses Delivered in the House of Representatives (1905)
Starting at $10.80	Testimony Taken by the Joint Select Committee to Enquire Into the Condition of Affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States: Alabama V3 (1872)
Starting at $34.89	Memorial Addresses on the Life and Character of David Wilber (a Representative from New York)
by United States Congress Starting at $10.80	Subscribe now for coupons, newsletters, and more!

value: Alibris is an online store that sells new books, used books, out-of-print books, rare books, and other media through an online network of independent booksellers.


text:
NOT A Books Kinokuniya Chinese Magazines & Japanese Magazines Promotions + New Arrivals BLOG: Japanese Magazine Baby Mo Feb 2012 Issue comes with with X-Girl Stages Pouch available at Books Kinokuniya SG
Japanese Magazine Baby Mo Feb 2012 Issue comes with with X-Girl Stages Pouch available at Books Kinokuniya SG
STRICTLY NO RESERVATIONS at Kinokuniya Ngee Ann City Orchard Branch. Liang Court Store 177 River Valley Road ...
The Military Specification Certificate is inside the box behind the watch as shown in the picture!! Purchase your copy here at Kinokuniya ...
Typical cost of bucket hat at BEAMS Japan. http://shop.beams.co.jp/shop/beamst/goods.html?gid=5958552 Now we know why everyone is buying...
Exciting Japanese Collectables Magazines with Freebies (Stamp, Currency & Pocket Watches!!)
For online enquires can email to sims@kinokuniya.com As usual for those who managed to get the Japanese Military Watch Collection using th...


text:
...chocolate muffins courtesy of Liz Baker (thanks!)...
...swimming with the Cooks...
...good talks and prayers...
...socks'n'shoes (the game)...
...another movie night with Leanna - Laura and Leanna gave me netflix for the summer, so we all have been enjoying it! :) ...


text:
a sense of place: A tragedy for sure
Gingi Edmonds is a freelance pro-life activist, writer and photographer based out of Hanford, California. Gingi writes a bi-monthly ProLife Opinion Column and is available for pro-life presentations and speaking engagements. Visitwww.gingiedmonds.com for more information.
Posted by S. Rich at 5:03 AM


text:
46 Degrees North: Spirit Airlines: Siding with Industry on This One
Posted by Citizen Jane at 3:59 PM
How about instead of saying, 'siding on the industry with this one' say, 'I am siding with the free market'?
In this particular instance, the interests of a single company and the "free market" happen to be the same. But what's true of one small company isn't necessarily true of the whole "market" economy. That would be like saying that what you say of carrots should be true of all vegetables--and by extension, the whole biosphere.
When Spirit Airlines starts trading in derivatives, we'll have issues.
I will too if those derivatives are the result of an artificial (I guess not so much artificial sense Fannie/Freddie were bailed out) sense of security that was dictated by bad political policy...
Here's how derivatives could work for an airline.
First, the CEOs save money for the company by firing all the maintenance workers. Then, with the aircraft rapidly deteriorating, they start betting that their own planes will crash. When they do, the company cashes in.
From a purely free-market perspective, it's a win-win situation for the airline!
For your little scenario to work it would have to involve the government offering a guarantee at the expense of the full taxing authority on the performance of all of the airplanes regardless of maintenance - thus giving people the (artificial) confidence that those planes would in fact never crash. Still think it sounds 'free market'?
The thing is, Six, that no such government "guarantee" existed before fall of 2008 because there had never before been a need to bail out banks and lending institutions. Chronic lack of oversight, along with reckless behavior on the part of those companies, led to a financial crisis such as no one had seen in generations. So the bailouts began under Bush and were completed under Obama. All the experts agreed that it had to be done, odious as that might have been to all concerned (except the fat cats who started it all).
What we need to do now is support strong financial reform legislation now being drafted and demand that the government makes sure that no financial institution in this country will ever again be "too big to fail."
Bailouts weren't part of the problem--they were the unavoidable solution.
I can hear Idna screaming now, but I just happened to see this little item right after I posted the last comment:
If someone's biased, that doesn't necessarily mean they're wrong.
Well, I see that I am being dragged into this discussion. I thought that we were done with the Spirit Airlines after you posted the volcano item. But then I noticed that there were more comments to the Spirit Air ..... AND my name was used in vain. So I must respond. I have two things to say:
1. When I first read this post I thought, "Wow, Jane is starting to GET IT! There is hope."
2. Then I read the bit about the Airline derivative fairy tale. Can you let me know where one can bet on airlines crashing? Even Vegas doesn't give odds on that! Fire all maintenance workers?
I know it was just 4/20, the holy day of pot smoking, but seriously, Jane, what have you been smokin?
Jane - do some research.
Fannie and Freddie existed with an implied guarantee of the Federal government because they are GSE's (Government Sponsored Enterprise). That existed long prior to 2008. Nearly all mortgages are government sponsored regardless if you get it from your local bank, a mortgage broker or Bank of America. Because of the GSE status, anything Fannie and Freddie sold was automatically assumed to be AAA rated - largely because of the implied government guarantee. Since they are GSE's, congress and the presidents can manipulate them on the grounds of political policy to 'promote' homeownership... it becomes a political organization rather than one based on good economical principals reactig appropriatly to the Free Market. So when they want to promote homeownership, the elected leaders make it easier to qualify to buy a home and still have Fannie/Freddie buy thier mortgage and re-sell it in mbs. If you get a mortgage from your local bank, Fannie or Freddie buy it on the secondary market (they set the credit guidelines to what they will and will not purchase which in turn is the criteria used by the banks), put it in a collatoral pool, then re-sell it through places like Goldmans. This leads to more people being eligible to buy homes... causing increased demand for homes - leading to price increases. Then political pressure results because home prices have gone up so much that lower income demographics cannot afford a home because the prices have gone up... so Fannie/Freddie are manipulated to make it even EASIER to buy a home (i.e. 100% LTV, Interest Only mortgages now being purchased) which leads to mortgage companies qualifying more people causing higher demand, rinse and repeat. This really got started under Clinton who heavily promoted home ownership - it was left unchecked and in some ways made even worse by Bush.
So do you see now how this was the catalyst to the problem? If anything, regulating congress is what we needed.
I am not excusing banks, particularly the investment banks like Goldmans, but there is a mechanism to punish failure and poor decisions... we did not allow that take effect like we should have. Tremendous rewards should be available to those who take tremendous risk, but so should tremendous failure to those taking the risk. The problem with having Fannie/Freddie was that the American taxpayer was the one forced to take the risk while those at companies like Goldmans were allowed to reap the tremendous reward with no real risk. That is wrong, but it was facilitated by the governments awful policies (i.e. mark-to-market accounting which is a whole other subject itself) and misguided regulation, not simply Goldman.
Personally, I want to see the Goldmans people go to jail... however, I want to see some elected officials who were in charge of overseeing Fannie/Freddie, etc go to jail for thier gross neglegence and out-right lies about the state of those two government-sponsored entities. They along with the negotiating of the AIG bailout are two of the greater crimes committed against the American Taxpayers ever.
Oh and all experts did NOT agree then or now... however, it should be noted that a few years ago most all experts agreed that Fannie/Freddie and the economy were fine. There were a few 'fringe', 'chicken little' types that were ridiculed for hinting that something like this could happen. They were the ones mocked for pushing Bush to try and reform Fannie/Freddie and audit more closely thier books.
Excellent explanation, Six. Below is a link to a 2003 NYT article that shows how the Bush admin. saw problems with Fred & Fran and tried to set up more regulation of them.
But notice at the end of the article: "These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis," said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. "The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."
Over the years, President Bush's repeated attempts to reform the supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were thwarted by the legislative maneuvering of those who emphatically denied there were problems with the GSEs.
I think Barney Frank should be the very first of many Congressman who should be brought up on charges.
Idna, I don't know if you'll see this comment after all this time, but I just want to say thanks for your thoughtful analysis and information-rich comments. The whole mortgage meltdown is a big, complex subject, and as time allows, I've been doing some reading on the subject. Thanks for your insights!