The misuse of terms like "scientific values" is an insult to reason and the integrity of the scientific method. 

Science is a tool—a brilliant, irreplaceable tool for discovering truths about the natural world. 

But as Stayed, values? Morality? 

These belong to the realm of philosophy, to the exercise of rational thought applied to human action and existence. To call values “scientific” is to betray both science and morality, reducing them to a meaningless abstraction.

The scientific method operates within the boundaries of measurable, objective reality. 

The scientific method has people who observe, the method involves experiments, the end is  a person proves. 

But morality is not a science—a rational code of ethics derived from the fundamental question of what is necessary for man to live and flourish. Morality is rooted in the facts of reality, yes, but it is not subject to the same processes of empirical validation. Values cannot be measured by instruments or tested in laboratories; they are chosen through the exercise of reason and free will.

Those who invoke “scientific values” are not advancing science—they are perverting it. 

They, the woke et al. use the term to evade the hard work of philosophy, to smuggle in their own unexamined beliefs under the guise of objectivity. This is not the pursuit of truth; it is intellectual cowardice.

Science and philosophy are two distinct but complementary realms. 

Science can provide us with the facts of reality, but it is philosophy—reason—that tells us how to act upon those facts. 

To conflate the two is to destroy both, leaving man adrift in a fog of contradictions. If we are to defend the mind and the method of science, we must also defend the sanctity of morality as a rational enterprise. The manipulation of language to blur these distinctions is the hallmark of collectivism and intellectual dishonesty. And it is to be rejected with all the certainty of a mind committed to truth.