You probably THOUGHT you had a point, but you didn't and are therefore a deluded dipshit whose wires are crossed so badly that the electricity is scared of going near you. You're a FUCKWIT on a high of misinformation.

Let's kick your fucked up fancy into shape:

Another cooker attempting a historical rewrite – classic. Let’s set this straight before your brain overheats like a 2005 Dell laptop running Vista.

First, the #Indue #CDC (that’s Cashless Debit Card for those playing along at home) was introduced by Scotty from Marketing’s crew back in 2016. It was administered by Indue, a private company that made a nice little fortune off the backs of welfare recipients. The card was about 80% restricted payments, meaning recipients couldn’t withdraw much cash or buy anything they deemed 'bad' – pubs, gambling, maybe even fun. Oh, and let’s not forget the forced rollouts in specific regions with little to no community consent. Sounds familiar?

Now, onto the Enhanced Income Management brought in by the Albanese Government. The key difference here – and this is important, so take notes – is that it’s run by Services Australia, not a private, profit-making company like Indue. Also, it’s largely voluntary, unless you’re in places where income management has existed for years (thanks to earlier policies that even predate Indue). No forced expansions. No sneaky backroom deals. Just a replacement to wind down the Indue disaster without throwing vulnerable communities into chaos.

Now, what’s that you were inferring? That Labor introduced the Indue card? Mate, that’s like blaming the new chef for serving up last night’s burnt lasagne. Labor cleaned up the mess, didn’t expand Indue, and sure as hell didn’t hand fat contracts to their mates.

So, before you come in here spinning conspiracy theories, maybe read a fact or two. Or better yet, ask your carers to help you out.

No, petal, we have doused the flames of your cross wired explosion, so fuck off.