Hello .@annamerlan , I just read your article in .@techreview and I am glad to see you here. Not because I agree with you because I believe in the collective intelligence of a wider community engaged in constructive dialogue. 

In that spirit, I find you article too one-sided and actually trying to shut down what should be considered as healthy skepticism. We should be asking ourselves the questions instead of claiming science has figured it all out already.

The scientific process is about always disproving the previous theory and we should not stop people from attempting to uncover other angles or narratives, doing the research and trying to figure out the truth.

Then, what we should do as the recipients of said theories (conventional or not) is to challenge and check them. I challenge yours as just repeating what the mainstream is saying as a religious mantra. So immediately you lose a middle of the road skeptic.

What I recommend is thesis, anti-thesis and synthesis.

If you read the above please do so with the understanding of my utmost respect for your position, values and drive.