you are confusing authoritarianism with economic organization

socialism simply promotes that the means of production should be owned by the people participating in it

capitalism promotes that the means of production congregate at the hands of the few, those who hold the capital

both of them can be authoritarian or democratic and everything in between. the level in which the state involves it self in these systems can be from nothing to everything

thats how you get libertarian socialism or state socialism, they are different. same goes with capitalism. thats why you see ppl like eric voorhees talking about the free hand of the market and how it solves everything (it factually doesnt) and accuses american capitalism of being too interventionist

as someone who appreciates crypto you should recognize the different patterns of economic organization in them. for example, the people own the means of production, not 1 person like capitalism but many. thats their most basic function.

the primary asset needs to be well distributed. why? why dont we want the asset to owned mostly by 1 person or organization?

and why wouldnt you want the same when it comes to the economic organization of your country

why would you let integral industries like healthcare, at the hands of the few?

me paying 2.5 or 3% (not sure) of my salary to the nationalized healthcare system, covers me for anything and everything ill ever need for my health. sure its a tax you dont pay. but do you think you pay less under the capitalist structure you are under now? and do you think you are covered as well as i am under it?

its a socialist policy yeah. is that so bad? that people, regardless of how poor they are, dont have to think about healthcare coverage?

you guys are so cucked, and so bad at recognizing which system is fucking you, and what each system does, that everything bad that happens to you, is somehow socialism or communism, and you find a way to absolve that which actually fucks you over which is hyper capitalism