This is also perpetuated by a central system that encourages mediocrity. Why should a state innovate or reform if it knows the Union will bail it out with funds? It's a vicious cycle underperforming states are rewarded with higher allocations, while high performing states are penalized for their efficiency. The question isn’t just about defunct rulers it's about a system that incentivizes failure and discourages success. If these states' leadership prioritized accountability and progress over political expediency, dependency could be shattered. But do they want to? Or is dependency a deliberate strategy to keep power firmly in their hands?