Oh wow. Nice find. I have bought their pistachios before. I did a quick grok check. Such a few other details.

Lynda Resnick, along with her husband Stewart Resnick, is a key figure in water issues through their ownership of The Wonderful Company. The company owns several agricultural businesses in California, including vast orchards of water-intensive crops like almonds and pistachios, which require significant amounts of water to cultivate. Here’s a breakdown of their involvement:

•Water Consumption: The Resnicks are known to use more water than almost any other entity in California, including urban areas like Los Angeles. Their agricultural operations consume billions of gallons of water annually, with a significant portion dedicated to their nut trees during California’s drought periods. This has drawn criticism due to the water scarcity issues the state faces.
•Kern Water Bank: They own a majority stake in the Kern Water Bank, which is one of California’s largest underground water storage facilities. This bank was initially developed with public funds but was later privatized. The Resnicks have been accused of using their influence over water policy to secure this asset, which has been contentious given the backdrop of water scarcity and the need for equitable distribution.
•Political Influence: The Resnicks have substantial political influence, particularly in water policy. They’ve been noted for their political donations, which some see as a means to shape water laws in ways beneficial to their interests. This includes securing water rights that favor their agricultural operations over public or other private uses.
•Public Perception: There’s a polarized public perception regarding the Resnicks’ water management. Critics argue that their control over significant water resources during droughts prioritizes profit over public interest. On the other hand, supporters or company representatives might argue that their operations bring economic benefits, job creation, and some level of philanthropy to the communities where they operate, although this philanthropy is sometimes viewed as a response to public criticism.
•Environmental Impact: The Resnicks’ approach to water use has environmental implications, particularly during droughts. Their practices have been criticized for exacerbating water shortages, particularly when compared to the water needs of local communities and ecosystems.

In summary, Lynda Resnick’s involvement with water issues is primarily through the management of The Wonderful Company’s agricultural operations, which consume large volumes of water, and through their strategic control of water resources like the Kern Water Bank. This has placed them at the center of debates about water rights, environmental sustainability, and the impact of private control over public resources in California.