It has been well-demonstrated, repeatedly, painfully, and often with widespread death and destruction, that the policy priorities of progressive environmentalists are not human safety, human prosperity, or human happiness.

For some progressive environmentalists, I think their dream world about which they fantasize is a world in which there are no human beings at all.

For some progressive environmentalists — not all, but certainly some — the silent vacuum of space punctuated only by occasional stars, planets, moons, asteroids, and other celestial bodies that sustain no life — or at least no rational, thinking, moral human life — is good.

Rational, thinking human beings trying to understand what is good, trying to be good, are bad.

Curious conclusions, eh?

Well, many things progressive environmentalists say and do are curious, including preventing fellow human beings from preparing for the destructive forces inherent in nature that can be bad for human beings.

So I'm curious: Are there ANY progressive environmentalists who are embarrassed or ashamed of the pain, destruction of property, poverty, loss, and death, they've caused for other people? Or do progressive environmentalists remain proud of what they do because they see human beings as the biggest threat to the silent vacuum of space punctuated by lifeless celestial bodies?