I’m reading these comments, and the concept of pjs is being lost and the $2mm NET income number.

1) Pjs are business tools. The popularity of celebrities flexing on Ig make it seem like rich randos are flying all over blowing cash left and right. There is a small segment that is skewing this topic. 

2) People who fly pjs are laptops-open, generally stressing about the deal from where they just took off or about to land. They are conference rooms and temp offices. They are for people to take advantage of opportunities in another location, and it wouldn’t matter if the interior were stripped down like a M*A*S*H heli with a couple of lawn chairs inside. It’s about reaching the destination fast and direct and coming back. No one is posting “Hey check me out in a pj trying to figure out how are are getting replacement financing for a bank that just went dark on us!” …worrying about if they can get back to the office in time. The primadonnas will care. The execs just want to go fast. I promise you ask an exec if they want to travel to a destination commercial biz class total time expenditure of six hours, take a train for total nine hours, or pj for total three, but they have to sit on a sawn off church pew, and there’s no heat, you’ll see how fast they find their ski clothing. It’s speed. Period. 

3) Someone who is flying regularly is flying for business. Those who are flying for leisure are generally flying occasionally. The regular flyer making $2mm net is after their corporate flying expenses. Their leisure expenses are from their $2mm net income. The relevance of the $2mm net and $20mil net worth is that this is a general profile of someone just starting using pjs for corporate use.

4) People enter the market with charter because their deals start to make sense. You can move more people around faster, and there no commitment. You can go one way. A real estate developer doing a deal in Miami from NYC who has an emergent meeting or situation can rely on getting there fast when necessary, for example.