I took a good long look at the “report” and it means nothing. See below x 4 pages and the next thread, pages 5-7. 

The appropriate test is microscopy and cultures and sensitivities. Had this been done, we would know 109% which exact antibiotics worked against SM. 

As it stands, the report admittedly draws NO conclusions. To jump from that to “there’s SM in the fog” and it’s a “bioweapon” is absurd, fearmongering,  and disingenuous. 

—————-
To boot, … (cont’d)
See pg 2