This is the stupidest non-argument around. Allow me to put your out of your misery of repeating it:

1. Historically, male only spaces were governments, business & education. Basically, where decisions about society were made. Women were right to insist on participation in these spaces, as women are 50% of society.

2. If men want more male only spaces for privacy, dignity & recreation - create them. Don’t blame women. Just create them. Be proactive. “Some women won’t approve of them” isn’t an argument not to do it.

3. Some of the more famous - or infamous - male only institutions, i.e Boy Scouts - didn’t become unisex because of “feminism”. It was because of major abuse scandals. The institution required women for rebranding and membership. It was that or close down. So, any future male only spaces need to safeguard against abuse within their own institutions.

4. Places like male only gyms & barber shops are relatively easy to exist beyond the confines of the law. Make them intimidating enough and women self exclude. Certain demographics of men do not self exclude from female only recreational spaces, in part because of the nonsense argument you’re pushing. A sense of entitlement. Hence why the law needs to be involved to protect female only ones.

5. Finally, when women wanted access to the male only spaces of government, business & education, they didn’t simultaneously force people to believe they were literally men and call them he/him. So your entire argument is a false equivalency.

Women being seen as human beings is not the same as men being seen as women.

You’re welcome.