It's funny to see someone with such a completely incorrect premise in the wild.

Walz was a weird, creepy, effeminate liar who exaggerated or made up almost everything about himself. Not a CSM, did not "carry weapons of war in war", did not go through the IVF process, did not get the awards and accolades he claimed he had, did get a DUI, was not a head coach, claimed to be a hunter but didn't know how to load a shotgun, complete Fudd, looked equally out of place "repairing" his car... And his wife was a condescending school marm with crazy eyes.

Add all that to his tendency to prance around and performatively clap and cheer for Kamala, and he was uniquely off-putting to basically everyone I've ever met who had a shred of actual masculinity.

He was also extremely off-putting to my wife and a bunch of women I know.

I said it at the time, but I'm not sure I've ever seen a faker candidate for anything.

If you only look at his politically curated resume on paper, I guess he seems like a "guy's guy", but that only works if you don't actually ever see the way he acts or listen to him talk (or if you've never actually met a male human within normal testosterone levels). In reality, Walz was so far away from appealing to normal men that it would be hard to find someone worse. Shapiro would have been significantly less embarrassing, and would not have thought that wearing a camo hat would be enough to trick everybody into believing he was a real manly dude.

And here this poor fellow has made an argument built on the hilariously dubious premise that Walz was actually the guy that DNC talking points tried to present him as being. But... He was nothing of the sort. He's like the Temu version of that guy at best.