“Whataboutism” is a a pejorative aimed at people pointing out hypocrisy. It’s one of the crazier nonsense wizard words, up there with “cis.”

I can understand if a cornered narcissist when faced with valid injured parties immediately pivots to point out that worse people exist in the world. Sure. But establishing a standard for judgment is obviously important.

For example my post on Andrew Tate. Obviously according to societies current moral standards there is absolutely no reason for him to not appear on any podcast that would have: biden, trump, Zelensky, anyone in congress, any tech ceo, any major celebrity etc. They all push degeneracy, lie, display some form of personality disorder, are in some way exploiting their audience or electorate for personal gain. 

Without a standard set in some logical framework everyone suffers from corruption and cognitive dissonance. Why is it bad for @jakeshieldsajj to have on dr David Duke, but it’s ok to have on dr faucci? It’s nonsense. And allowing someone to tell their story is not validating them, it’s offering consent to people to make their own choice.

Ironically, unfair censorship and persecution actually feeds into a diluted self image of grandiosity and persecution. It has the opposite effect. 

It’s why I’ve intentionally and aggressively reminded people for years that I’m just a comedian who wants to work at what I do best. Because the psychotically biased and hypocritical persecution of me by obvious liars creates an illusion that I’m more special than i am. That I’m to lead and save people and I’m the arbiter of truth. No, I’m just really really funny and I have a very rigid code of ethics that allows me to think and function at a high level because of my lack of internal contradiction.

Now that I’m starting to get platformed again you can clearly see I’ve always just wanted to talk about interesting things, be funny, play music, and live a good life.