I have been asked by many my thoughts on Zuck’s comment to the below.

This is my personal point of view. I am not representing any companies in my response.

First, he seems ill-informed, as every human possesses both masculine and feminine energy. 

Second, he narrowly associates masculine energy with “aggression/do things with my guy friends/beat each other up/marshall arts.” 

Third, he claims that corporate culture has shifted away from masculinity.

In reality, companies are run by humans, and both energies—masculine and feminine—are essential and beneficial. Brands like E.l.f. are great examples of how corporations are moving toward balance.

We are not moving away from masculinity yet TOWARDS balance. Big difference. 

By framing corporate success as reliant on aggression and a hyper-masculine approach, he reveals his own entrenchment in outdated social constructs. That perspective simply doesn’t align with today’s era.  

It’s clear there will be business consequences for that mindset. It may not be this very moment yet as we shift towards a balanced mindset his leadership style will be outdated.