Video of congressional testimony to offer a little insight on Merchan and Bragg’s lawfare against Trump. The Manhattan DA concocted a low-level felony criminal case by obfuscating two different misdemeanors, one for falsifying business records and the other for violating an obscure state election law that has never been used. The Judge never required the DA to fully articulate his case theories during trial, violating the 6th Amendment, and then permitted the jury to choose among three different options of what constituted “unlawful means”—meaning the jurors were not required to agree whether a critical element of the alleged crime was committed. These options are not nuances and any arguments to the contrary are dishonest. Accordingly, we still don’t know exactly what the jury found Trump guilty of doing. 
“Trump was accused of falsifying business records to defraud … somebody, with the intent to further or cover up another crime. But we don’t know who he is accused of trying to defraud. We also don’t know what crime he’s accused of trying to cover up (sometimes it’s called the “predicate” crime). And we further don’t know what’s allegedly false about the 34 records mentioned in the indictment, jury instructions, and verdict. Really. Donald Trump stands convicted of 34 counts of making false statements in business records without the indictment, jury instructions, or the verdict identifying the allegedly false statements.“ Adam Mill, Wash DC Attorney. Mill has contributed to The Federalist, American Greatness, and The Daily Caller.