Your nitpicking of the words of the ulema won’t help you in the Akhira. 

You conveniently omit the part of the speech where Imam Al Bouti commanded Hafez to rule justly, followed by a dirty look from Hafez. 

You also would not mention Imam Al Bouti’s role in getting many people released from the prisons of Hafez, because this fact doesn’t help your slanderous agenda of “he was a regime stooge bootlicker”. 

Many critics do not seem to be familiar with how the scholars in Syria had to take a non-confrontational tone when addressing the oppression of the regime, because one wrong word said against Bashar/the Assad family could land you and your family in Sednaya. 

An example: You can see Sheikh Kruayyim Rajih (an openly pro FSA scholar, may Allah preserve him) in Damascus appealing to Assad with his “justice” to release innocent people from the prisons. 

When Sheikh Kruayyim went to Qatar, he was able to change his tone regarding Assad, but so long as he (and other ulema) were in Syria, he had to utilize a non-confrontational tone. 

Of course, the ulema are not infallible and can make mistakes, but to denigrate them, slander them and insult them is reprehensible and haram. 

You are free to disagree and hold your own opinions, but at least show some respect for the ulema who endured these conditions and show some integrity.