Is anyone in the media actually going to push back and get clarifications or just parrot the narrative?

I keep seeing references to “other time than the first day of the session” but other times can mean AFTER the first day of the session NOT before the start of the session. 

Can we get details on each of these? 

It just seems weird to not specify “before the start of the session” if there is evidence of that and that’s what they’re claiming is acceptable. 

Are all of these other swearing in sessions hidden from the public too? Is that really in the spirit of democracy to deny the public the ability to witness and confirm that they were sworn in?