🚨Sounding the Alarm: What If You Could Spot the Next Big Short or FTX Collapse Before It Happens?

It is critical that Americans understand the following about Bitcoin before crony interests attempt to push a taxpayer-funded Bitcoin Strategic Reserve. I will be publishing a full article on this and more this week and will be scheduling as many interviews as I can to discuss.

I am operating on the assumption that Trump simply hasn’t had access to this information and wouldn’t likely make this decision if he knew. However, the strategy of using taxpayer funds to buy this asset is now metastasizing to the states. 

1. Bitcoin was hijacked. It was originally designed to be a form of digital cash for everyday transactions, not what it has become.  

2. The hijackers have ties to the intelligence community and traditional financial systems.  

3. A small group of core developers profit from Bitcoin’s inefficiencies. They have financial incentives to keep Bitcoin slow and expensive.  

4. The same interests behind this transformation are funding all three U.S. CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency) pilot projects.  

5. The hijacking is undeniable. Some argue this doesn’t matter because Bitcoin as "digital gold" is a better use case, but that position ignores fundamental flaws in its current state.  

Bitcoin’s Reality:  

At best, Bitcoin is now slow, expensive, non-fungible, and a tool of digital surveillance.  

- Artificially small block sizes (1MB) have created a technocratic "cap-and-trade" system, ensuring high transaction fees and slow processing times. This would even cripple its use as digital gold if adoption scaled.  

- Transparent blockchain technology allows governments and third parties to track transactions, undermining Bitcoin’s fungibility. Individual coins can be flagged, blacklisted, or whitelisted, making them non-interchangeable.  

- The primary argument for Bitcoin as "digital gold" is the 21-million supply cap, touted as the hardest money ever created. Yet this cap is not immutable. Developers, including one recently alleged to be Satoshi Nakamoto (Peter Todd), have been advocating for increasing the cap for years.  

- Price appreciation—often used as proof of Bitcoin’s success—has largely been driven by Tether, a stablecoin that may be artificially inflating Bitcoin’s value by printing tokens without adequate backing.  IMO, Tether is likely to became a situation 10x worse than SBF/FTX. Furthermore, many with ties to Tether are trying to work their way into influence with this administration. The implications of this are bad for Bitcoin and will likely lead to bank control of stablecoins (which are essentially backdoor CBDCs). 

If individuals choose to buy into the narrative of Bitcoin as digital gold, that’s their prerogative. But forcing taxpayers to fund this flawed, hijacked version of Bitcoin is an entirely different matter. It’s unacceptable.  

@ShannonJoyRadio @libertytarian @HealthRanger @BretWeinstein @drdrew @brownstoneinst @jeffreyatucker @RealAlexJones @RiceTVx @monerotopia @ColinTCrypto @VigilanteCrypto @SallyMayweather @AgoristN @steveinpursuit @mannion4nh @KelleyPotenza @chrismartenson