I see you copy and pasted an entire trial argument in one tweet, and I don’t have the time or desire to write a novel back. Here is my short response….

1. The Ring footage shows a clear hole at 5am. Telling me a hole is not there in that taillight is like telling me my dog has no legs. I see what is obviously very clear.

2. The taillight pieces didn’t “magically appear” 3 days later. The secondary search team came that same day due to a blizzard. More pieces were found over the next week because…

Snow melts. You know, science. You boasted a lot about it your tweet.

3. The Sally Port Video wasn’t “altered”. It recorded inverted, just like Target records inverted at your local self checkout. No conspiracy needed.

4. You made no point.

5. John wasn’t in a cul-de-sac, so I’m not sure why you mention that. Also, the ME’s affidavit said his wounds were not consistent with a physical altercation. His eye bruising is a medical condition caused from his back head wound…

You know… science.

6. ARCCA was given limited data to analyze and did not recreate proper weather conditions, different body positions, etc. They built a cannon. Science needs all the data to interpret.

7. I understand what a mistrial means. Thanks.

8. Jen McCabe does not have extensive law enforcement experience. Lol.