In recent years, we've witnessed a troubling trend in many westernized countries where governments, under the guise of protecting citizens, have made decisions that contradict the very foundations of democracy—namely, the right to free speech. This contradiction not only undermines the principles of an open society but also raises questions about the motivations behind such actions. It often appears that these decisions serve the interests of politicians rather than the populace they are meant to represent.

The beauty of karma cannot be overlooked in this context. A historical example of this is the McCarthy era in the United States during the 1950s, when the government aggressively suppressed dissent and targeted individuals suspected of being communists. This period of fear and censorship ultimately led to a backlash, culminating in a renewed commitment to civil liberties and a more robust defence of free speech in subsequent decades. Those who operate within these systems, enforcing censorship and limiting discourse, seem blissfully unaware that their actions may have far-reaching consequences. What goes around truly comes around, and history has shown us that the suppression of free expression often leads to a backlash that can dismantle the very structures they seek to protect. As we navigate these complex issues, it is crucial to remain vigilant and advocate for the fundamental rights that uphold our democratic ideals.