Steady on chaps! 

If the ‘significant’ group you are referring to is the Satmar, matters may be more complex. Their anti-Zionism is opposed to the ‘state of Israel’, yes, but they are not (en bloc) supporters of the Palestinian Resistance.

There is of course also the Neturei Karta folks who are more pro-Palestinian than the Satmar, en bloc, though they appear to have some sort of relationship with the Satmar.

This is one of the reasons I say that the universe of anti-Zionist Jews is a complex matter which needs more research/data analysis. 

As Neturei Karta Rabbis continually emphasise, the position of virtually all the Ultra-orthodox in Palestine in 1947 was ‘anti-Zionist’ as in opposed to the state of Israel being formed. But they were not necessarily opposed to Jewish settlement in Palestine.

The definition of anti-Zionism was also more elastic than today’s anti-imperialist anti-Zionism. For example in Hebron in 1929 the supposedly anti-Zionist Chabad movement spied on the Palestinians and passed the intel on to the Haganah, as well as allowing the terror gang to store their weapons in the local bank (run by a Chabadnik).

Of course Chabad and practically every other Charedi group (Belz, Bobov, Breslin, Ger, Skver etc) has made their peace with the Zionist state and many now send their young ment to a special type of religious institution in which the study Torah as well as serving in the occupation forces and, thus, participate directly in the genocide. These ‘Hesder’ Yeshivas are often in illegally occupied parts of the West Bank. 

So, yes, let’s have more discussion of what it means to be ‘anti-Zionist’ and who can meaningfully be said to be anti-Zionist?