The NY Times on ending parking minimums - which I generally oppose as parking should depend on each application and not assume ending minimums won't create problems:

In other cities and in response to other proposed developments, the refrains are similar: Residents express worry about cars continuously driving around their neighborhoods looking for parking spaces or their own inability to find convenient parking. The concerns can be heightened in neighborhoods with high concentrations of older people or families with young children. Some residents complain that their driveways will be blocked by illegally parked cars or that increased traffic will lead to unsafe conditions for pedestrians and cyclists.

The fight over parking is especially fraught in historic or revitalized neighborhoods, where narrow streets that predate cars don’t always accommodate parking, and parking lots are less likely to be part of the existing design.

Chad West, a Dallas city councilman who supports the elimination of parking minimums there, said cities could use parking policy as an incentive. The city, Mr. West said, could offer to ease parking requirements in exchange for preserving historic or architecturally significant structures. (A zoning committee voted in January 2024 to advance a proposal that would eliminate minimum parking rules in Dallas.)