This is important. 
@McFaul @anders_aslund @vonderleyen @ArbaKokalari @Daractenus @Mylovanov @Statsmin. @profgalloway puts it pretty spot on. As I have said, it does resemble the 1990s in the former Soviet Union. Also this does mean that the middle class will not be reinvested in. While it really would need that. It means Europe might very quickly need to pick up to torch. Together with other nations unless USA can't counterbalance itself. And it also means that there is a risk of ulterior motives based on personal preferences, whims and infighting. As well as the strive for enrichment.
And as stated earlier today. There is probably a vast difference between the 2024 environmental legislation for mining etc between USA now with the reversed EPA SCOTUS ruling and the Danish laws. If you want minerals on the cheap and also have a possibility leaving without taking care of the environment, the Danish laws are not the preferred choice.

*Temporary post. Will delete later.*