I have found sometimes a pure X-Ray is not sufficient to confirm the existence or non-existence of a fracture.. a CT shows it up distinctly. Happened to my mom.. she had an impact fracture on the hip.. X-Ray did not show it correctly, but since she was still experiencing pain & could not standup, the ortho asked for a CT & was able to confirm a fracture..  

While AI seemingly detects a fracture line in an image, my take is that in this case the AI seemed better than a doctor because the computer's resolution to read  images is higher than what we see when we see images..   

& sure it may seem as if for things such as these a.k.a fracture an AI works reasonably, but I don't believe an image processor / LLM based AI is sufficient for diagnosis of anything & everything.   

It would be best not to replace the doctor?  

Had you gone thru the process of internal medicine diagnosis to determine the cause of a series of symptoms you would have understood why a doctor cannot be replaced so soon!  

Sure, we can write an intelligent program that can assist  doctors in places where the human sensory organs fail.. so that it is an augmented diagnosis (AI serving as another tool like MRI / CT / X-ray / blood tests etc) rather than trying to replace experience, but completely replacing the doctor or doctors fearing for their jobs.. I don't think it'll come anytime soon..

I don't also believe that AI in its current form can replace anyone's job.. it is just one of those mirages which will fade away & mutate into augmenting one's job.. to replace, intelligence programs need a completely different approach.