'Czarism, Totalitarianism, and Communism on a continuum. In application they're essentially the same thing'. =   No they aren't. 

Communism is rule by false promise from feminine minded men, of equalisation with the lowest common denominator. It's simply the political manifestation of the feminine demanding community investment in her offspring, or in the modern world, whatever 'vulnerable' group they have been convinced to see as a psychological stand in for the children they aren't having. And as such it is dysgenic.   

Czarism is rule by masculine aristocracy and elevates ability to status, and is such eugenic. But the tie in with Darwinism is the brutality of a survival of the fittest (Rome).   

You have not restructured your idea of left and right being a spectrum between collectivism and individualism, because you don't yet understand that extreme individualism is a luxury belief able to be held due to the stores of civilisational capital generated by the collectivism of previous generations.   

Individualism to a degree is important, because individuals compute, enabling larger structures and hierarchies. But once people start believing the false promise that the individual is the primary political unit, it starts undermining the group, and that group will be evolutionarily outcompeted by another group.