@elonmusk, your crusade against 'legacy media' echoes a familiar playbook from history. In the 1930s, the Nazi regime demonized Germany's established press, labeling it as corrupt and deceitful to delegitimize dissenting voices. Goebbels, as Minister of Propaganda, weaponized this rhetoric to consolidate control, replacing independent journalism with state-aligned narratives.

When you dismiss 'legacy media' WITHOUT SPECIFICITY, you risk sounding less like an innovator and more like a populist politician seeking to erode trust in pluralistic discourse. 

Which outlets, EXACTLY, do you mean? Are we to lump Pulitzer-winning investigations with clickbait tabloids? Or dismiss voices that challenge power simply because they don't align with your narrative?

There are countless independent journalists across the political spectrum doing critical work—reporting on war zones, corruption, and corporate malfeasance, including the kind emanating from tech monopolies. Painting 'legacy media' as a monolith is not only misleading but also dangerous in an era where disinformation thrives.

The world needs a free press, not another Goebbels-like ministry, no matter how innovative its branding.