LMAO @piteasio that's literally theft. 

The user makes a swap for $173 of a token and your protocol gets 43b tokens for the swap. You can't just decide during the transaction that user didn't buy $173 of the token at X price and actually only bought 0.06 cents while you get the difference. 

Even if you're slapping in fine print you're planning on screwing them due to "volatility" the piteas router still successfully bought 43b tokens for the $173. Going "well ackually a fraction of a second later the price dropped so we're going to keep the price difference" is scummy. That is criminal and NO legitimate dexes allow for 98.5% slippage to protect users from that volatility. Not to game them from everything but it. 

You literally bought X amount of tokens using someone else's funds and gave them a fraction of the value they sent because of a technicality????? 😂😂😂😂😂

LMFAOOOOOOO that's literally theft and acting like the "terms of service" makes it okay is SHITTY.