As the creator of the largest DAO onI've been asked to join a lot of party rounds for other DAOs -- like almost every one TBH.

I've declined all but two-- one I thought was funny and one that was created by partners in our community who have been supportive of me, who I've worked with extensively and know.

I don't see anyone complaining about any of those WLs. I don't see you mentioning literally ANY of those thousands of other people who were on < 100 person party rounds for months. It wasn't until a DAO broke through the $100m that people started complaining.

The more I think about it, the more I think that the people who are shitting on everyone for that are just totally retarded assholes.

Like seriously, look at yourself in the mirror. Most of you are who are complaining are just hypocritical as hell, and if you had the opportunity to make a 100x you'd jump on it and not think twice. You were excluded you are on some high horse, but you have no moral fiber.

What did you get done this week? Push some buttons? Go fuck your own face. You're the problem as much as anyone.

Now, that being said-- yeah it's a broken system. The ideal launchpad needs to be one where you can choose to either get in early and vest or buy the market. I'm sure this will be the modelgoes with moving forward.

Frankly, I'm pissed off about the launch for other reasons. The whole project felt like a vampire attack from people who were supposed to be helping us lead our tokenomics to come out and announce a tokenomics plan that I felt was... exactly what we're doing. Yes, we're doing a launchpad, but we're also building out an investment DAO to support our ecosystem and make real investments in legit projects. It pissed me off a lot that people in our community are leveraging my name and our DAO brand to launch their own thing before making sure our comprehensive plan is in place. If the idea was so good, why not contribute it to our tokenomics?

I said yes to being an advisor because I wanted partners in my community to feel like I supported their effort, and didn't really think deeply about how misaligned it was with our stated goals. It's a vampire attack, like everyone asking me to shill their project or put my name on something without thinking about the win/win first. 

Is greed really that powerful that people would rather launch their own project than stick with a unicorn that has made them incredible amounts of money? Apparently, yes.

But the guys didn't do anything wrong with their launch. They built hype for their project and used a system that MANY other people have used. They played the game totally fair. Otherdaos have had WAY more unfair party rounds, but they didn't have big names on the launch so nobody cared. The AICC folks could not have anticipated that they'd have the most successful 1-day launch in history. It's absolutely unfair of ya'll to be so hard on them for what amounts to basically just being this: you weren't on the list. That's it. If you were, you wouldn't be complaining. You wouldn't be saying "crime" and tagging zachxbt.

Many of you acted like total fucking babies. Like seriously, are you in high school? A lot of you have rugged your communities, sniped projects, leveraged alpha, and suddenly you're on your high horse... get off it. Nothing was done shady. In fact, the only reason you know anything about anything is because it was all public and connected to socials.

If you want to fix the system SHUT THE FUCK UP AND BUILD SOMETHING. Tweeting some death threats at people who have done something that got them some popularity ain't it.

I'm sure I'm gonna get some more death threats for this but at this point, the people giving me death threats are just proving my point. You've ripped me for launching my own projects with my own IP when others stole it, you've ripped me for supporting cool tech because the devs did dumb things …