Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Awful
Review: I believe Problems of knowledge is a very biased book, because from the very beginning Williams has the goal of selling you his version of contextualism. His treatment of coherentism, foundationalism, and other epistemological theories is geared only to set up his own views of which he overly generalizes in order to hide many of his own shortcomings. His argument for why contextualism isn't a form of relativism is especially bad. However, it is not as terrible of a book as my first review implied. Chapter five on Aggripan skepticism is very good, and the book gives an excellent overall summation of the history of epistemology. In regards to writing style, I find that the book is very dense and dull, and Williams' sentences are often not very clear. To make matters worse, it is also a very difficult book, and one that I would not suggest to someone not highly interested and trained in philosophy.
