Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Ignorance and revisionism
Review: The author has given a reasonable and interesting history of warfare up until the 1600s. He does not understand the military and has ignored truth in defining and explaining their actions. He makes assumptions about current military thought based on ignorance. He has no knowledge of the current theories of war as presented by Boyd.He gives a typical liberal view of the military based on feelings from the 1960's. He ignores the actual facts of the behavior of American soldiers and assumes they rape, pillage and plunder as in the past. He describes the bombing of North Vietnam as carpet bombing by B-52s. He has no understanding of current air warfare. His description of using air power as a terror weapon reminds one of the older theories of Douhet and not those of Warden.The author needs to educate himself on current means of warfare.
