Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Warner Bros. Screws Up Kubrick DVD, Again!
Review: A great film vandalised by a stupid decision. Why in the world would Warner Bros. fail to release the DVD edition of this last of Kubrick's great films in standadrd 1:33 format? What is the point of DVD if not to provide home viewers with the highest quality version of its theatrical release print? Why not at least give customers the choice of either format, as so many studios do on their discs? It's a crying shame, an idiotic decision, and one can only hope Criterion will pick up this title and do it justice. Warner Bros. remains at the bottom of the heap for DVD competence and quality.
