Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: terrible
Review: As an atheist myself, I have to agree with Prof. "D. Shultz's" review; not only does this book lack "intellectual rigor", but it goes forth presupposing that naturalism is an INEVITABLE ground to sustain atheism. Not only is it NOT inevitable, but it is probably the WORST and most philosophically contestable (for the same reasons that most educated theologians would never argue for God's existence from the same ground). The book is a scientistic - that is, a philosophically "unround" - embarassment both to science and to the integrity of atheism. All it shows is that the author has no clue about the variety of ways in which theologians construe the notion of "God" - an ignorance that is painfully typical of scientists and science writers with a superficial knowledge of theology and, particularly, non-positivistic philosophy.
