Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: The critic was right.
Review: When I first read the reviewer who listed detail after detail that was wrong with the book, I thought he's just picayune. OH NO!!!! This is the sloppiest published work I have ever seen. Some typos (and there are typically 3 or more per page)are so bad you can't even guess at the meaning of the sentence.The writers obviously know and love their subject--it's just too bad no one edited or proofread their work. Ironically, they tout their superior research as uncovering various inaccuracies--to what end, when it's published in this garbled format?He's right about the photos, too. Why are they so indistinct and faint?Finally, there is no rhyme or reason to the order in which the material is presented. While each bit might be interesting, chronological order or grouping by topic certainly would have lent more impact and avoided repetition. (It actually looked like sections were merely cut and pasted several times).
