Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Creates false dichotomy to support its view
Review: This book commits the same logical fallacy that most Calvinist books are guilty of. That the only two significant views are Calvinism and Arminianism. The truth is that a small fraction of non-Calvinists are Arminian. Thus, the book in a sense creates a straw man and then burns it down to support its contentions, hoping the reader will then assume that the alternatives to Calvinism have been eliminated. Far from the truth. It doesn't even touch on other doctrines, such as the Limited Foreknowledge view, the Middle Knowledge view, and especially not the increasingly-held Open-Theist (or Neo-Theist or Open Dispensationalist) view. I'm not a Calvinist, but I can say... there are good books on Calvinism out there. But this isn't one of them. (But I can't help but continue to be dogged by an annoying question... If Calvinism is true, does that mean that God predestined me to be a non-Calvinist?)
