Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Myth Buster? or Historical Misinterpreter?
Review: DiLorenzo's poorly-written "history" novel is little more than a regurtitation of Mises' and Hayeck's economic theory, unartfully paired with a selection of historical facts, perverted into poor and nauseatingly repetitive conclusions. DiLorenzo's inability to craft English sentences with a subject and object is not quite as disturbing as his inability to preserve historical integrity. He has presented no "myth busters" to anyone who has read an American historical text in the past decade. I am a capitalist, and for the most part agree with DiLorenzo's standpoint. However, he could have made a legitimate argument without making sensationalist, exaggerated (and often flat out incorrect) claims. Any two-hundred-fifty page novel that could be condensensed into a fifteen page essay isn't worth your $26 bucks.
