Negative Positive
Title: Poor Production quality, plot, and theology
Review: The film concept was interesting and held the potential to be very thought-provoking and innovative. However, the writers appear to have a poor grasp of theology or the nature of academic research, making the writing inauthentic and unbelievable. This also killed any of the theological import it could have had.Further, the production values were poor at best. The camera was kept almost exclusive at a middle/close-up, with very few to non-existent cut-aways or alternate shots. Long takes cans be effective when they have a reason, but here they were merely dull. Further, the sets were bare and inauthentic and uninteresting. The shots were almost uniformly too long (each one could have lost a few seconds at least), making the pacing unbearably slow.Overall, there is almost nothing to recommend this film.
Is the review positive or negative? 