Negative Positive
Title: Personal attacks off-putting
Review: The author needs to be commended on finding the 160 or so medical references to support his position. In the process he needed to overlook or dismiss 10 or more medical articles that did not agree with his bias for each article he found that he agreed with. Like Fox New, any claim to being unbiased should be viewed with healthy skepticism. While the author should be allowed to advocate his bias, he should stick with the facts rather than resort to ad hominem attacks. Doing so makes him look desperate and unprofessional.
Is the review positive or negative? 