Negative Positive
Title: A transparent classic
Review: Although I found the arguments a bit transparent in the beginning, it is clear what Meier and Stewart have done here is produce a classic post-constructionist work of scholarship--this book literally is what you make of it. Nonetheless, it is a rollicking good read in same tradition as their earlier work, "A General Theory of Everything, and Other Things We Keep Meaning To Get Around To." Highly recommended, though I'm not sure what Keith Gaddie (see first review) read.
Is the review positive or negative? 