Negative Positive
Title: My opinion on Harold the Last of the Saxon Kings
Review: I think the book was very well written. Most biographys are written promoting the subject as the hero of the piece, using selected source material to back them up. Here the author does neither. Harold is presented in a straight forward manner, and source material is presented that both backs up the English view of a hero as well as the Norman view of a lying oathbreaker. By the end of the book I was pulling for Harold to win!
Is the review positive or negative? 