Negative Positive
Title: Good explanations, but bias abounds.
Review: Starting on page 97, the book talks about the "We don't ban cars" argument in regards to the gun control debate. The authors call this a questionable analogy because "Handguns serve few legitimate purposes in private hands; AK-47s and the like, none at all; restricting their use would make relatively little difference in most of our lives."In addition, solutions for the end-of-chapter exercises had no given solutions, making it difficult for study in a politics class like the one I'm taking with this book.While the book is an enjoyable read, the biases of the authors leave a bad aftertaste, leading me to only give the book two stars instead of what would be maybe four. For casual readers who aren't using this as a textbook, I'm sure that better books are out there.
Is the review positive or negative? 