Negative Positive
Title: I won't buy Grisham anymore after this one
Review: Can I give this book less than 1 star?I've been losing faith in John Grisham as an author for awhile, but have continued to buy his books because some of them (Runaway Jury) are great reads. The King of Torts, however, has convinced me not to waste my money anymore. The book has no character development, a plot that is 20 years past its prime, and no conclusion of any interest. The whole time I was reading the book, I kept waiting for something - anything! - of interest to happen. I was sorely disappointed.Grisham also lets his readers down by failing to do any research into the Washington, D.C. public defenders office (or any other public defenders office). As Grisham admits in his author's note, the "OPD" portrayed in the book is wholly fictionalized because Grisham was too lazy to do any real research or fact checking. If Grisham can't waste his time finding out what a real public defenders office is like, then why should we waste our time on his book?
Is the review positive or negative? 