Negative Positive
Title: pseudoscientific nonsense greatly decreases credibility
Review: If she accepts and advocates any and all new age mumbo-jumbo that sounds good, how can I put confidence in her ability to critically filter through all of the research about hormonal therapy, etc.? Just because she cites medical references doesn't mean that they are high-quality studies published in respected medical journals, or that they are studies that are applicable to a wide range of women. And given her level of accepting completely ridiculous things such as "tarot", etc., it is my guess that the scientific advice she gives is just her take on whatever random studies fit with her theories, and probably does not reflect a good grasp of current research. Truly knowledgeable clinicians know how to filter the good from the bad. What could have been a promising book touching on an important topic was undermined by her kooky beliefs.
Is the review positive or negative? 