Negative Positive
Title: A fully understood misunderstanding
Review: Fukuyama misunderstands history in a way that is not entirely his own. One need only leaf through the pages of Hegel to find such unfounded optimism.As a scholar, I recently took a look at what would be the continuation of Fukuyama's statistical work. That is, the growth of democracy, and it's funny how that growth has been curbed in the past 10 years or so. Time will show this book to be Fukuyama's Folly!
Is the review positive or negative? 