Negative Positive
Title: One-sided
Review: George Trepal has been a friend of mine since the mid 1980s, long before he was accused of this crime. What bothers me about this book is also what bothered me about the investigation: that other people with motive, means and opportunities were not thoroughly investigated, and that the victims continued to be poisoned while in the hospital and not within George's so called reach. I do not know if George did the crime, but I do think this book is a reflection of the real crime here, and that is of professionals doing a poor job of examining all of the facts before rushing to judgment. I think an impartial review of the facts does not lead to guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. George may have indeed committed this crime, but I think he was falsely convicted of said. This book could have looked at that aspect better. Djordan@cfl.rr.com
Is the review positive or negative? 