Negative Positive
Title: The Emperor Has No Clothes!
Review: The idea of a mad scientist creating a human monster was a great idea--especially in the year 1816. However the book is boring...implausible...over-written...under-edited...and boring. So why is is so famous? Let's face it, today nobody would have heard of, much less read, this book if the 1931 movie hadn't made it famous; yet the book and the movie have very little in common. So why does it get such great reviews? Again, let's face it, the title is so famous that most people don't want to say that they don't get it. But there's very little to get, other than what you read into it--the emperor has no clothes! But credit to Shelley for a truly great idea.
Is the review positive or negative? 