Negative Positive
Title: Not as it seems....
Review: While I was greatly looking forward to receiving my copy of this book as I had enjoyed it years ago as a graduate student (borrowed at the time) I was greatly disappointed with the materials. While the book the represent is there, it is clearly a poorly done reprint. Pages do not line up within the text as the format is larger than the original text. There is no table of contents and in most cases when there is a list, I am left with the impression that the person working with the material has no clue how to use a word processor. It is certainly not the book they show when you look at the "view inside" option. The DeCapo introduction is not there. I have never had to return a book to Amazon before, however in this case I think I am making an exception as this is a terrible version of one of the great examples of bibliographical history. It is clearly not an edition I would recommend to anyone.
Is the review positive or negative? 