Negative Positive
Title: This doesn't rate a single star
Review: It's difficult to say who should be more ashamed of themselves: the author for writing this incompetent twaddle, the publisher and editors for accepting it uncritically, or Network Associates for apparently endorsing it: this will do their reputation as security vendors no good at all. The author clearly knows very little of networking, virus or anti-virus technology, and the source code presented is irrelevant. And why a chapter about Y2K in a book published in the year 2000?
Is the review positive or negative? 