Negative Positive
Title: Not Great
Review: She has an interesting, though not really original, philosophy but her arguments are very blunt, long-winded and repetitive. Her characters, antagonist especially, were caricatures who seemed so unlike actual people. Within a few chapters I realized she had just taken Soviet style propaganda and turned it up-side down. Seems she decided that communism is pure evil so whatever is the opposite must be pure good.I had to skip the second half John Galt's 59 page speech. It was like she was trying to ram it into my brain. It was so insistent and repetitive.Even as a capitalist and an individualist Atlas seemed like an extremist vision, blind to the imperfections of capitalism and glorifying it with religious devotion.
Is the review positive or negative? 