Negative Positive
Title: Patronizing crap
Review: Since Sid was an insider, any reader expecting an objective account of Slick Willie's tenure will be sorely dissapointed. Despite the meaty heft of the tome, Sid flails about weakly attempting to castigate Clinton opponents (and often on hearsay)but failing to explain the processes going on at the time that resulted in: a) the biggest economic bubble and corporate pilaging of the 20th century (sorry kiddies, you can't blame Bush for that one); and worse b) allowing al-Queda to stage smaller terror attacks relatively unpunished that led directly to 9-11. I could care less about Ken Starr and the McDougals, as they don't matter compared to what happened in NYC that very ugly day, and his boy Clinton had a major hand in allowing it to occur.
Is the review positive or negative? 