Negative Positive
Title: Cornwell should stick to fiction
Review: I love Patricia Cornwell's books of Kay Scarpetta. But this book is a long, boring, monotonous read of her view that Sickert was Jack the Ripper. I saw nothing in this book that convinced me that he was Jack the Ripper and her conclusions seemed to me to be more guesswork than fact. I also found that her determination in presenting Sickert as the only possible killer and nothing could deter her from that idea (even the facts) to be annoying, frustrating, and slanted to her views. I do not recommend this book to anyone. I waded through, but wouldn't want to put anyone else through the agony if I could prevent it.
Is the review positive or negative? 