Negative Positive
Title: Why is this still catalogued as "nonfiction"?
Review: When I was a teenager I eagerly devoured all the books in this series, and their presentation as nonfiction works affected the way I read them. Like many others, I was duped. These books still have some genuine interest and redeeming worth, but not as nonfiction, and it is definitely a disservice to present them as such. Maybe we need to include these books in a special subcategory: "Nonfiction, bull****ting" . . . or some such. Really, these are best enjoyed as works of fantasy. I could give a higher rating if the author had been more honest in his presentation, but as they were presented to us they are potentially harmful to gullible readers. I think a lot of people have been hurt as a result of having accepted these writings as nonfiction.
Is the review positive or negative? 