Negative Positive
Title: Taking your audience for granted.
Review: While I don't expect literary perfection in a tecno/spy/military thiller, Clancy's work in "Rainbow Six" is poor enough to insult the itelligence of even his most die hard fans. While the over the top portrayals of the environmentalist-wackos were entertaining, they were overshadowed by the weak develpment of a shallow and repetitive plot. The poor quality of the book's editing make it clear that this book was rushed to market to satisfy the expected ( and,no doubt, realized ) demand. It appears,( to use a metaphor that is repeated three times in the first half of the book ) that Clancy gave no more thought to the crafting of this book than to "zipping his fly".
Is the review positive or negative? 