Negative Positive
Title: I would sue my editor if I were Scharf
Review: Please save your money. This is the most poorly edited book I have ever seen in print. It is rife with typos, mispellings, and other mistakes. For example, on every single page of an entire chapter, the chapter heading reads, "U.N. SANCITONS." Pages are littered with all sorts of mistakes that an editor (or Scharf himself) should have caught on even the most preliminary skimming. As my title indicates, I would sue my editor if I were Scharf. Additionally, while Scharf provides interesting problems and scenarios for discussion at the beginning of each chapter, the ensuing materials are usually badly outdated, oftentimes from questionable sources (for instance, the Christian Science Monitor), or so haphazardly strung together that it is difficult to get a coherent picture of the topic under discussion.Surely there has to be a better text on the United Nations.
Is the review positive or negative? 