Negative Positive
Title: "Padded" history of a political friendship
Review: The professional book review cited by Amazon really says it all about this book. The author's premise - that the Roosevelts and King George VI & Elizabeth had an extra-special relationship - is very overreaching, and padded to the nth degree. I guess that Hugo Vickers (per the Author's introduction) who is supposed to have read it from cover to cover before publishing, didn't notice the flawed research, the melodramatic phrasing, and repetition of hoary old gossip as the truth. I am so glad I only borrowed this from the library and didn't waste my money on a purchase.
Is the review positive or negative? 