Negative Positive
Title: Environmentalist?!
Review: Unfortunately he misleadingly titles himself an environmentalist. He is (and writes like) and economist, not a scientist or philosopher. I find he contradicts himself, and whether or not everything he writes is accurate or not, he never once addresses the issue of whether or not it should be said. As he says himself, without the scare tactics of parties like greenpeace, the world would be in much worse condition than it is. I think that, as a book for the general public, it could cause an alarming rise in apathy. If things are better, it is because people are starting to worry about the environment, and consequences of our throw away society. Who is this imbecile who thinks he's right to put them back at ease?
Is the review positive or negative? 