Negative Positive
Title: Another donation to the Tom Clancy retirement fund......
Review: I really didn't want to be disappointed with this one. Clancy's fame is well earned after penning such winners as Red Storm Rising and The Hunt for Red October. So, setting aside the multitude of grammatical and spelling errors, what's the explanation for the redundant descriptive phrases and shallow dialogue that riddle this story like rounds from an MP-10? Furthermore, I couldn't get past the basic fallacy of the plot, which was that no evil scheme of such cosmic proportions as this one could plausibly escape the notice of the general public. And how about the families of all those Project members? Finally, as if Clark's punishment of the environmentalists wasn't enough, Clancy wastes a good portion of our woodland resources in pages and pages of empty writing which don't provide the readers or the characters with anything useful. If this had been a movie, I would have waited for the VHS version....
Is the review positive or negative? 