Negative Positive
Title: Definitely Not a Who Done It
Review: About the only question answered in this book is, can a phony journalist pretend to know the truth and write a whole book about it? You bet she can. Really, isn't it time these people were held accountable?How can we have an honest debate about the AIM legacy when the argument is reduced to how many dispensations should be granted to proven falsifiers of history? How many times must mock journalists be proven wrong before their defenders stop defending them? And why must their challengers always come up with new examples of their lies, as if the old ones don't count. Where is the integrity in defending them? I speak of the Harvey Ardens and Antoinette Claypooles and Ward Churchills of the world and of how easily they are exposed as shameless charlatans in books such as American Indian Mafia, and in court records that somehow never make it to the footnotes section of their nakedly political rant-rags.
Is the review positive or negative? 