Negative Positive
Title: very good, but not enough info
Review: To me, this book was a good first step in opening theory. However, it needs to be updated, and has MANY errors (typos, not analytical). What always bothered me was that it only went into the "main lines" of openings for the most part, and in some instances avoided some of the riskier yet popular variations. I still highly reccommend it.I just bought Standard Chess Openings, by Schiller. I like it even more, as it has analysis of landmark games for all of the openings listed. I might choose that as the next step after Fine's book.
Is the review positive or negative? 