Negative Positive
Title: Propaganda & tired pseudoiconoclasm
Review: Some people will do anything for a little propaganda. A book like this could just as easily have been written about Socrates, Rabelais, Shakespeare, Nietzsche, Joyce, or a lot of other people. Whenever a revolutionary new thinker comes along, the irrelevant, talentless pseudoiconoclasts (e.g. Richard Noll) come along to take them to pieces. Spare me yet another hyped-up 'j'accuse!'. Yes, I did read it and take note of it, and the facts are selectively chosen and selectively interpreted. A waste of money, and deceptive & vindictive too. Burn this.
Is the review positive or negative? 