Negative Positive
Title: I agree with the mathematician from New York
Review: I agree with the reviewer from New York. I can't claim I noticed any of these glaring errors myself, or would understand them if I did, but apparently they are there so I'll say my bit and leave. All these errors would be at least partially pardoned if this was a good novel. It's not. Somehow I managed to get through it, but it's not good. It's terrible. Too long. Awful. DULL. So there's TWO reasons not to read it. Why bother when there's so many better Crichton thrillers on the market? Go read "Airframe" or "The Lost World"!
Is the review positive or negative? 