Negative Positive
Title: Hackneyed reworking of atheist theory
Review: The main ethos of this text, that human evolution converges with an archetype of the divine, is an old ideal, first purposed by Nietzsche as the "Ubermensch." This is not the only troubling dynamic of this book, however, as the entire basis, a reconciliation between evolutionary science, and the biblical creation, is faulty at best, and impossible in reality.Unfortunately for M. Chardin, his working does not break, crack, or even reach this barrier of failure. With its intermingling of atheist ideology, with irreconcilable creationist theory, it is a fractured effort that must err on the side of theosophy, and not philosophy (and most certainly not science).
Is the review positive or negative? 