Negative Positive
Title: Weak, weak, weak
Review: Repetitive conjecture posing as fact does not make fact. I came into this book expecting to be fascinated and convinced. Sadly, I was very bored (which rarely happens to me with ANY book) and finished feeling Cornwell had made a very strong case that the individual she accuses of being Jack the Ripper most certainly IS NOT. Weak, convoluted writing; repetition after repetition of the very same "facts" in nearly every other page. Exhausting read that left me disappointed beyond compare. Worst book I have read in years.
Is the review positive or negative? 