Negative Positive
Title: Waste of good paper
Review: I anticipated a book with a lot of hard information about the use of "mind machines". What I got was a superficial Time magazine article that ran on for several hundred pages. I was unable to force myself to wade through the hash of gee-whiz anecdotes and generally purple prose to get the end of this volume, but it is hard to believe the the second half will make the kind of stylistic change that would make the book interesting or useful.
Is the review positive or negative? 