Negative Positive
Title: not writing, slop, perhaps useful as toilet paper
Review: Kurt Vonnegut is not a writer. He is someone who was able, through his contacts with governmental money provided to academics in the 30s, to foist is sloppy, humourous(lacking actual literary ability) cheaply and dishonorably written work upon us. As a student I was forced to read this monster. His books are not writing, they are pure tom foolary. This book, lauded to be the capstone, the beggining for an exploration of his touted literary genious, is actually probably only useful as toilet paper.So it goes... Kurt Vonnegut uses this disgustingly cheap segway to work himself out of every situation. His book wastes pages and pages of precious ink talking about aliens and splicing in images of WWII.Its pure trash. Up their with Michal Moores "stupid White men".
Is the review positive or negative? 