Negative Positive
Title: Boring ... nothing special
Review: This book is unoriginal, shallow, poorly organized, and overly wordy (he sounds like he is just rambling on, trying to sound "learned", but saying nothing of substance most of the time). I had to force myself to finish this one.There are several better books on the topics that are covered in "Technopoly" -- I would especially recommend "Autonomous Technology" (Winner) and "Technological Society" (Ellul), "Cult of Information" (Roszak), and "The Arrogance of Humanism" (Ehrenfield). These are much more in-depth, better written, and interesting.
Is the review positive or negative? 