Negative Positive
Title: Inversely Proportional to # of Songs
Review: Besides a poorly designed and viewer unfriendly DVD menu (e.g. lack of chapter or subtile options) the next obvious criterion for quickly discerning the quality of a movie is the number of songs used as a filler for lack of acting, story, script, directing, etc. and this production had 42, yes 42 songs of mostly poor unknown quality at that. Possibly a record for any movie in history thus far. The over 17 rating forewarning at the beginning tells of "crude sexual language" that plus filler music plus the principal theme of old guys looking at young females should tell us something about the value of 90 minutes of American time. The only explanation is that these rom-coms must be produced for lonely dissatisfied American men and women still stuck in some adolescent fantasy world.The only surprise is that neither a N.Y. or L.A. studio was the customary cash cow assembly line source for this well worn redundant genre. Money speaks and Atlanta listened.
Is the review positive or negative? 