Negative Positive
Title: Already forgotten
Review: This book was selected by NY Times as a notable book of the year. The NY Times, indeed, knew what's up. More than any other, Born to Rebel belonged to the year in which it was published; it didn't take long at all for it to be forgotten--as soon as the next year arrived it became a historical document. A classic? Stunning? Masterful? Why is its reputation in rapid decline? Sulloway writes books which don't even pass the 2-year test. Surely this is a perfect example of how vulnerable "contemporary" reputation is.
Is the review positive or negative? 