Negative Positive
Title: David Sklansky is a better player than he is a teacher...
Review: I have read two of Slansky's poker books now, and I feel they helped me only modestly. I know he's supposed to be the best poker author, but I feel in this book he gives very few examples of his concepts, and sometimes he spends too little time on a topic that deserves more thorough explanation. Some key topics are covered in less than one page, that's just not enough detail! Maybe it's just my personal preference, but other Poker books I read were more helpful.
Is the review positive or negative? 