Negative Positive
Title: Choppy
Review: I have not read Dr. Rodman's previous book on Winnicott's correspondence. However, this book seemed to me like an expansion of it. The effect of this style was to make the narrative choppy and uneven. While there were some tasty passages that inspired me to finish the book, these were too infrequent and distracted from by the over-reliance on quoted correspondence.
Is the review positive or negative? 