Negative Positive
Title: The usual radical fringe monologue
Review: For most readers, I suspect this book will be most useful as a tool to shed light on the radical fringe element that has always existed in American politics. As is true with a good share of his writing, the author has produced a work which is not so much non-fiction as it is the fulfillment of a pre-conceived set of beliefs. The book reads well and the countless references to previously unknown or little known incidents are interesting, but because of the author's obvious wish to support a predetermined opinion, the reader is left with little choice but to reserve room in his own mind for some healthy doubt. I would never tell anyone "don't read this," but if you plan on having a go at this one, just make sure you guard against automatically accepting every premise and conclusion contained in the book.
Is the review positive or negative? 