Negative Positive
Title: Waste of time...
Review: I love John Grisham, at least the old John Grisham. THE FIRM and THE PELICAN BRIEF were classics. Underdog lawyer trying to do the right thing, terrible greed, and exciting plot twists that kept the pages turning very fast. But The KING OF TORTS was just a story of the underdog lawyer, so to speak, immense greed, but no interesting subplots or twists that kept you going. At page 324, I decided to skip ahead to page 424 to finish it. I found that I missed nothing in those 100 pages that I didn't read that I couldn't figure out by page 427. This book left me very unsatisfied, as did the wwful THE SUMMONS and wondering if John Grisham has just lost his original touch to write a great legal thriller. I hope not.
Is the review positive or negative? 