Negative Positive
Title: REHASH OF PREVIOUS POP-SCIENCE BOOKS ON EVOLUTION
Review: THIS IS A SHORT REVIEW FOR A SHORT BOOK. THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IS NOT ONLY A BRIEF AND SOMEWHAT UNINSPIRED REHASH OF POP-EVOLUTION BOOKS AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE, BUT WOULD APPEAR TO BE A REHASH OF SOME OF HER PREVIOUS BOOKS. SAME THEORIES, BUT WITH A FEW NEW EXAMPLES. DEFINITELY NOT INSIGHTFUL. IF YOU'VE READ SOME OF HER PREVIOUS BOOKS ON EVOLUTIONARY THEORY, OR OTHER GOOD POP-SCIENCE BOOKS ON THE SUBJECT (LIKE GOULD,DAWKINS, ETC), THEN YOU PROBABLY DON'T NEED TO READ THIS ONE. I'M NOT EVEN SURE WHY THIS BOOK WAS WRITTEN. THIS NON-FICTION NICHE IS ALREADY OVERWHELMED WITH SIMILAR MATERIAL.
Is the review positive or negative? 