Negative Positive
Title: Shameful and Farcical!
Review: ln its critique of this book, the NY Times pointed out that the author violated every principle of valid research in hersimplistic endeavor to "prove" her absurd theory. Shockingly, the reviewer also detailed the many, many inaccuracies in this book, including the "stating of possibilities as facts, based on nothing but her intuition". The reviewer proves that Ms. Cornwall's book is both sloppy and insulting.Ahh, wouldst the publisher have been as thorough in its research! Did they just simply accept the book as irrevocable truth? Shame on them!
Is the review positive or negative? 