Negative Positive
Title: Thought-provoking but inconsistent
Review: I agree with the previous reviewer that this book offers an interesting description of the spiritual experience of having "no-self" but isn't a particularly inspiring read. What was confusing though is that in the introduction we're asked to transcend viewing Suzanne's experiences pathologically, but in the epilogue she herself sees that she has been dissociated due to childhood sexual abuse. Why ask us to suspend a pathological interpretation only to invite us back to that interpretation at the end?
Is the review positive or negative? 