Negative Positive
Title: So flawed that it's worthless
Review: I'd love to read a well-written, factual book on the positive aspects of circumcision. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be one. For scientific information, Morris relies on studies that are generally recognised to be outdated, flawed, or spurious. He bases much of his work on science that has been thoroughly repudiated.The anecdotal evidence is somewhat better -- but contains very obvious editorial bias. The author has blatantly cherry-picked information to fit his conclusion, and presented it in such a slanted, propagandist fashion that it's almost impossible to take seriously.For those who feel that the circumcision debate could use a well-reasoned 'in favor' argument, look elsewhere. I was very disappointed in that this book is so easily debunked.
Is the review positive or negative? 