Negative Positive
Title: Why did Strathern write this book?
Review: I've observed that there are roughly two groups of literary people: those who appreciate Dostoevsky's works and those who don't. The author of this book sits firmly in the latter group, which begs the question, "Why did he write this?" He is quick to point out the faults of Dostoevsky's major works, but then trips over his words and arguments in meager attempts to describe the positive attributes. Indeed, if I were to base my opinion of Fyodor Mikhailovich and his works solely on this book, I would be quick to label him a neurotic right-wing nut job who couldn't write his way out of a paperbag. In short, if you're looking for a book that will help you better understand Dostoevsky and his works, this isn't it.
Is the review positive or negative? 