Negative Positive
Title: wast of talent
Review: Ken Bruen is a fine writer with a gift for creating truly nasty villians and that surely accounts for the appeal his dark vision of the nature of some humans has for readers. But this book has the look of a story he knocked over a lost weekend or two so he could pay his bar bill. It's like a rough draft of the first book of a diabolically clever series. He just doesn't seem to have the time or energy to work out the plot details that sustain even a shred of credability. Disappointing.
Is the review positive or negative? 