Negative Positive
Title: A Religious Dream Dictionary
Review: As mentioned in the publisher's note, Miller wrote this book in the first decade of the twentieth century. It is based on religion rather than psychology, with attention paid to The Bible and the role dreams played throughout.The author posits that a dream is a vision of the future, and that any relationship with the past or present is incidental.From a religious perspective, I question the authority and validity of the author's interpretations.Scientifically speaking, the work has very little to offer aside from an alternative/historic view (which is not without value).Now that dream psychology is mainstream, and religious dream interpretation is on the fringe, this book's title is misrepresentative. A more fitting title might be "A Religious Dream Dictionary: 10,000 Dreams Interpreted."
Is the review positive or negative? 