Negative Positive
Title: What might have been
Review: Martin's book, both in its rushed first issue and its 'corrected' 2nd issue, is a study in 'what might have been'. The first issue contained numerous errors, the revised is only slightly better. Too much of Martin's writing is superficial andplodding. For Day 1 at Gettysburg, Harry Pfanz's new book is much better, though not quite at the level of his previous books. The best basic book on the first day still seems to me to be Warren Hassler CRISIS AT THE CROSSROADS.
Is the review positive or negative? 