Negative Positive
Title: Well-written in form, but flawed in substance.
Review: The reviewer below who cited logical errors in Raschke's thinking is dead-on, and he identifies a common larger fallacy in postmodern thinking - namely, inconsistent logic. It's a favorite tool of the modern scholar to use straw men and ad hominems, because in so doing, they subtly trick their listeners into thinking they've got the "other guy"'s number, then they go ahead and tear apart the argument.Personally, I'd be wary of anyone who wants to marry Christianity and postmodernism, because the two worldviews are fundamentally opposed to one another. This book is slick, and Raschke's a talented writer, but he's wrong. A better (or at least complimentary) read on postmodernism is Groothuis's "Truth Decay", because he accurately represents both thought-systems.
Is the review positive or negative? 