Negative Positive
Title: Give me a break-- reality check here, folks
Review: I'm tired of people who know nothing of what it means to be in Special Operations writing about it-- and getting it wrong, time and time again. Clancy doesn't have a clue what the true spec-ops guy is and this book is the worst of his stuff yet. Hunt for Red October was good, but this-- the bad guys are such idiots a girl scout troop could take them down. And the good guys aren't. I served in the military because I believed in democracy not to be judge, jury and executioner. Even Dick Marcinko's stuff is better than this. Or check out Andy McNabb's SAS books. Or Bob Mayer's special forces series. Let's get is straight.
Is the review positive or negative? 