Negative Positive
Title: This book is no Trinity
Review: Hate to have to rip Leon Uris, but this book seemed like it was written just to quiet those people who clamored for a Trinity sequel. Either that, or he did it to make an easy buck. After reading this, you would swear he wrote the thing in about a week. The writing on Galipoli isn't bad and this book might be okay if it had to stand on its own. But as the sequel to Trinity, it captures none of the inspiring qualities of the original masterpiece.
Is the review positive or negative? 