Negative Positive
Title: Eurocentric bias. Uses old theories now proven wrong
Review: It is hard to understand why this book won the pulitzer (though another reviewer points it out: only journalists give the awards -- not scientists, historians and others in relevant fields who could have pointed out flaws).Readers would benefit from reading J.M.Blaut's criticisms of this book, in his Eight Eurocentric Historians. Also any other author that can discredit this eurocentric nonsense (though they likely won't get awards from the "establishement" I bet!)
Is the review positive or negative? 