Negative Positive
Title: History is written by the victor.
Review: Diamond writes from the perspective of the victor. This compromises the integrity and content. Obvious clues stare him in the face, but he refuses to see them. He admits hunter-gatherer worked less hard to survive than the farming counterparts. He admits humans are included in the category "animal". But the explanation as to the slow acceptance of farming and civilization are still attributed to a flaw, or problem within the people themselves. The idea these people chose to remain hunter-gatherer over farmer is outside his realm of possibility. This is why he claims there are still many questions unanswered. Inaccurate and ethnocentric.
Is the review positive or negative? 