Negative Positive
Title: Forgive me, fellow Vonnegut fans.
Review: Yes, I know, this is Vonnegut's classic. It left a huge impression on everyone who read it when it was first published. I just read "Cat's Cradle" for the first time, though, and I must say I was disappointed. I am a huge fan of Vonnegut; I read Slaughterhouse-Five and Hocus Pocus before "Cat's Cradle," and several others since (I hope to have read all of them by the next millennium), but I think that "Cat's Cradle" was the least impressive of all, especially after just having finished "Hocus Pocus," his best I have read so far. "Cradle" lacks the emotion and wit of 'Slaughterhous," or "Bluebeard," and the tremendous humor of "Hocus Pocus." He seems to take the story just a tad too seriously, which is strange because this is his most bizzare and unrealistic story. Of course, simply having been written by Vonnegut, it's inherently better than about %99 of all books ever written, but if you're going to read just one or two Vonnegut books, this should not be it
Is the review positive or negative? 