Negative Positive
Title: One sided rant from start to finish
Review: This book shows signs of promise as a historical work from time to time. Unfortunately, the author is extremely sloppy in his argumentation, and it is impossible to tell from one sentence to the next whether one is reading something that has a hope of historical foundation, or just more anti-banking and anti-banker rantings and ravings. The author is so unfair to his subjects, it is difficult to read this book without developing sympathy for the institutions and individuals he most wishes to criticize. One sided rant from start to finish.Even worse on monetary fundamentals, which apparently escape the author's comprehension. If banks create the funds they lend out of "nothing", then why do they suffer when borrowers fail to pay them back?
Is the review positive or negative? 