Negative Positive
Title: Poor - at best.
Review: A poorly written account of an interesting subject. The editor should be ashamed at letting this one go to the presses.All of the "evidence" is circumstantial at best - and more precisely; ridiculous. The only value this book can be said to have, is a interesting link between Sickert and one of the hoaxed Ripper letters. Don't waste your time or money.
Is the review positive or negative? 