Negative Positive
Title: No, the Case is NOT Closed
Review: Just because Patricia Cornwall spent a lot of her own money investigating Walter Sickert, does not mean that Walter Sickert was Jack the Ripper. I got sick of her writing style, especially when she told the reader NUMEROUS times that you can't get DNA from ashes (Sickert was cremated). Okay, I think we get it, once was enough. I didn't see any conclusive proof presented. She would say things such as, "There was no evidence that Sickert was in town the night of this murder, but there's no evidence that he wasn't either." Well, that certainly narrows it down. He must be The Ripper!A long-winded waste of time. Can't recommend.
Is the review positive or negative? 