Negative Positive
Title: What a Shameful Sham
Review: How can you take seriously a book that cites Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves as revisionist history? The first two chapters are a sparse, 12-page description of what the author claims is critical thinking. This is followed by a tour through history, science and religion. What becomes more and more obvious as you read is the entire enterprise is a thinly disguised arguement for Creationism, the Anthropic Principle, Intelligent Design, and Christian Theology. The author concludes with the claim that Christian theism does not violate the rules of Science.I was so hoping to find a book that actually dealt with Critical Thinking. I am still hoping.
Is the review positive or negative? 