Negative Positive
Title: 50 years Later
Review: That's how long ago it was since I have seen thefilm, (I was 18 then, you do the math) and it wasas good as I remembered. However the version I sawwas on television and probably had cuts compared tothis version. There are supposedly a few hintsat homoeroticism, according to Vito Russo and hisbook "Celluloid Closet", but I missed them, exceptfor the loving polishing of Jocko's sword, othersmay know what I mean. Another surprise was the castingof singer Julie Wilson (I think she's still around) ina heavily made up non-singing role (At the time I sawthis on TV I hadn't yet heard of her, that and theshort time on screen made no impression at that time.)All in all, an overlooked and underrated film.
Is the review positive or negative? 