Negative Positive
Title: A disoriented work of (humorous) fiction
Review: This book somewhat succeeded in terms of humor. I had quite a few laughs and I recommend it to those who believe in science and thus can treat this book as a work of humorous fiction. The "facts" are so distorted and out of context that I am shocked this is not categorized as a work of fiction. I guess Mr. Panzer is not familiar with third-world development and that the primary mechanism for progress in these developing nations is birth control. Come on now Mr. Panzer, stop skewing the facts for some particular ideology you want to promote in the name of self-interest. As a so-called "academic" I expect more responsibility and validity on your part. Shame on you.
Is the review positive or negative? 