Negative Positive
Title: A dangerious misconception of Being
Review: Kudos to the translator for making the effort; certainly Heidegger isn't an everyday walk in the park. However, the difficulty in reading Heidegger's work is absolutely essential to fully Understanding how the inquery into Being is to be conducted. This recent translation lends too easily to the science of psychology, and is, hence, antithetical to the originality of Heideggerian 'brand' humanism. The profundity of "being and time" is to be discovered by the individual, by his own means; to use public language obliterates any hope of this.
Is the review positive or negative? 