Negative Positive
Title: ego unleashed
Review: When admitting that her assumptions are in no way demonstrable as fact, Cornwell puts the word "proof" in quotation marks (p. 192) "Proof" therefore becomes questionable, as in 'so-called-proof.' As in 'let's not allow PROOF to get in the way of a good story.' She doesn't. I believe the well-intentioned author could have saved herself some embarrassment by reviewing some of the Ripper books published over the years. Anyone can marshall this mess of evidence to convict their favorite suspect. She's just the latest (and perhaps most arrogant).
Is the review positive or negative? 