Negative Positive
Title: Tyndale' or Daniell's literary voice?
Review: I bought this book because it appeared to be the only book in modern English, available in Amazon, that would be a good translation of Tyndale's New Testament. I browsed Tyndale's "original" version online, and the letters are just hard to read for me in his old English. This book appeared to be the best option, except that when I began to read it, the common literary voice of traditional Bibles is not there. The literary voice that appears to come out is the author's.Since he is no Paul, Moses, or Tyndale, just as few examples, this book is not a keeper for me. The Bible, no mater what translation it is, is supposed to be the Word of God, the voice of God, does it not?In terms of translation and grammar, well, probably there should be relatively little problem here.
Is the review positive or negative? 