Negative Positive
Title: Scientific Dishonesty
Review: Potential readers should be aware that, according to a recent New York Times article, the Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty issued a report calling Lomborg's book an example of "systematic one-sidedness" and that "the publication of the work under consideration is deemed to fall within the concept of scientific dishonesty," as defined by Danish rules for scientific integrity. Based on his book, he got a job analyzing economic impacts of environmental regulations in Denmark. A classic example of the fox guarding the henhouse.
Is the review positive or negative? 