Negative Positive
Title: Unfocused, overly long, and dull
Review: I read and enjoyed "Flood" and purchased this sequel with high hopes. However, where "Flood" was a page-turner, "Ark" was a long slog through deep mud.The story branches out into a number of substories that are more filler than anything else, and have nothing to do with the main storylines. I admit that I skimmed the second half of the book, and I'm glad that I did. The payoff was absolutely not worth it.Read and enjoy "Flood" (which despite what some reviewers have written, has nothing to do with global climate change), but I suggest avoiding this unnecessary sequel.
Is the review positive or negative? 