Negative Positive
Title: Typical Newton claptrap
Review: If you've read any of Michael Newton's other books, you know what to expect from this one. As a writer, Newton has an agenda. He's going to twist facts and even write fiction to make what should be news stories fit into his model of the world. The publisher was sued for unsubstantiated comments he made in the first edition of this particular book. The writing is amaturish and the point of view so heavy handed you have to wonder who he's trying to convince, the reader or himself. In this instance Newton takes a deluded woman and exploits her delusion. After "Raising Hell," and "Hunting Humans Parts I, and II" it comes as no surprise. Newton is a writer who never lets the facts stand in the way of $5.99.
Is the review positive or negative? 