Negative Positive
Title: Scientific Dishonesty at Its Most Damaging
Review: Lomborg is not an expert . . . he is not even a scientist. His work is filled with errors and displays a general ignorance on ecological theories and processes. Readers would be better advised to turn to peer-reviewed journals (i.e., Nature or Science) for their information, or an Environmental Science textbook for an overview.One thing of note - it is important to be critical of scientific information. Every good scientist is. But there is a difference between critical thinking and lack of understanding. Lomborg does not provide a critical review of scientific literature.Have we made great strides in improving the state of the world? Of course. Without a doubt. But we have not won that war yet - we still have many more improvements to make.--ER Lawrence, Ecologist
Is the review positive or negative? 