Negative Positive
Title: How did this win the Hugo and Nebula?
Review: The mental movie running in my mind while reading this was produced by the BBC in the 70's; the characters uninteresting and cliched, the colors washed out and the picture grainy. Am I becoming bitter and cynical about awards? Are they now given to the works that are the least imaginative and most user-friendly? If I find any answers I will probably also discover how Braveheart won an Oscar and the blandest top 40'ish musical groups win Grammies. Hugo and Nebula award winners are are not necessarily the vanguard of the genre, but they are usually sure bets for good reading. Read something that did not win an award for that year
Is the review positive or negative? 