Negative Positive
Title: Stricken with false arguments
Review: There are a ton of holes in this guys arguments. Pretty sad too because I agree with his stand point that no one should tell us what to or what not to eat. It's our decision and survival of the fittest. However, his arguments were terrible and obviously so. I especially love the part on Lawyer Logic.He so comfortably calls the "lawyers" idiots for talking about restaurants being around for hundreds of years and then injects his own...more like thousands of years idiots. He should have done his research because restaurants have been around for hundreds of years. It's a very new concept in the scheme of things. Only goes to show how little he did his research.
Is the review positive or negative? 