Negative Positive
Title: Lacks unbiased reporting
Review: I read it cover to cover and back through again to find out why it was that I didn't like it. It's simple. The authors rely so heavily on the word of Flemmi, a mob "rat," who felt abandoned by his FBI handlers after he was indicted, that I have a hard time lending any credence to what he says. For that matter, the authors hold such deep contempt for John Connolly that their reporting of "true" incidents seems terribly biased. I don't doubt that after all the court cases have made it through the system, they will right yet another book. I doubt they'll provide any further insight into this Boston scandal then they do in this book.
Is the review positive or negative? 