Negative Positive
Title: Crashed and burned.
Review: How can environmental science have 2-3 worthy breakthroughs/month deserving of the classic SciAm recognition? SciAm used to be leading edge stuff. It was like winning the Nobel to have a paper chosen for publication.My subscription expires in June 2012. After 40-some years, SciAm and I will go our separate ways. I've already subscribed to American Scientist.
Is the review positive or negative? 