Negative Positive
Title: Terminator 2-- the most over-rated sequel ever.
Review: I still fail to comprehend why people say that this is the best Terminator movie, especially now that there are two other Terminator movies that are better. Putting Linda Hamilton's exceptionally poor performance (and I won't even get started on Eddie Furlong), this movie offers nothing but show-off special effects sequences that, by today's date, are no longer impressive. The liquid metal man looks like a windows 95 screen saver. I understand that this film was revolutionary for its time, but it certainly doesn't hold up to the second sequel as far as special effects or story go. Which leads me this: why is the story in T-2 so elementary? And why does the Terminator "feel?" I swear, there was once a day when James Cameron wasn't so damned Hollywood. What a terrible move.
Is the review positive or negative? 