Negative Positive
Title: LIES!
Review: Grisham goes on for who knows how many pages telling us that this dude is the king of torts, but anyone who's familiar with the academic literature on tort law knows this is a lie. What's even more annoying is that Grisham lacks the courage to argue straighforwardly that this guy is the king of torts; rather, he puts his weak argument in novel form, thereby using a gimmick of medium to obfuscate his fallacious message. That said, I think Grisham should win the National Book Award this year, on the condition that he accept his award naked, save for a Santa hat.
Is the review positive or negative? 