Negative Positive
Title: The Giver was not good literature
Review: The Giver was not good literature because it wasn't full of feelings, there was not interesting details, and there was not a surprise ending. The Giver was not full of feelings because Johanas' community had no feelings. Also there was nothing to explain if there were no emotions. Another reason why The Giver was not good literature is because there were no interesting details. Nothing was really explained in The Giver. Also in the interesting parts the author didn't really go into detail. Lastly, The Giver was not good literature is because there was not a surprise ending. The ending of The Giver was horrible. The last words of the whole story were "But perhaps it was only an echo." That is why The Giver was not good literature.
Is the review positive or negative? 