Negative Positive
Title: Creative, but less intriguing than Roald Dahl's books
Review: I read Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone because I wanted to know why people made a lot of fuss about it. After the first chapter, I understood. It was because the "newness" and genuine ideas created by J.K. Rowling. Although I was impressed, I don't think it's a "must-read" book, let alone being the very best seller. Perhaps I'm too old for Harry. The second and third in this series were boring for me as they dwelled on the same theme. The creations (words, scenes, and plots) were no longer catchy. I have to say Ms. Rowling has to prove herself after Harry Potter series end. Anyway, I can't say her books are not great, but my heart is still occupied by the prolific and creative Roald Dahl.
Is the review positive or negative? 