Negative Positive
Title: Not a scholarly book but somewhat entertaining.
Review: Authors continue to use material from by ostrovky, an agent who worked for the mossad and then wrote an unking book about them, inorder to portray the mossad. Including one of his most lurid claims about how This is a very slanted view. Shows 0 scholoraship. It includes some of the more fantastic claimes by ostrovksy.If I was interested in ostrovsky view, which is that of a traitor to the mossad, then I could read ostrovsky, but to continue to use ostrvosky material here to describe the mossad is ludicrous.This includes Ostrovsky statement that everyone in the mossad uses sex to advance. Aside from this I wonder how the author got all the info about how the mossad operated with Maxwell, including the details of meetings etc.. How can they know this information, without making up stuff. At no point do I get the feeling of scholarship in this work. This is somewhat of a pot boiler. You might enjoy this work of fiction or (non fiction) any way.
Is the review positive or negative? 