Negative Positive
Title: This is not music. Mahavishnu is, but this here is not.
Review: I have bought this CD, paying a lot of money to get it, being influenced by the 5 stars amazon.com reviews, but it turned out to be a huge mistake I have made. I am a big listener of John Mahavishnu's recordings (I own the best of them, from IMF to VOEB) and I consider that there is no possible comparision that can be made with Magma. Mahavishnu is a milestone in the 20th century music, while Magma is only a boring, a very boring, 100 % not musically band. No history. No one would remember anything about them. No wonder it is a french band. They should do what they do best and leave the progressive rock and the jazz-rock fusion for the anglo-saxon world. No ofense.
Is the review positive or negative? 