Negative Positive
Title: This is sham not shaman
Review: Anyone familiar with the literary qualities of Carlos Castaneda's works will see immediately that this book's author could not possibly be quoting or paraphrasing Castaneda. Anyone familiar with the philosophic qualities of those works will see that this book's author could not possibly have met with, and understood, Castaneda--before or after Castaneda's death. Whether you are looking for insight or literature, you will not find it here. This book is all sham. There is nothing of a shaman in it.
Is the review positive or negative? 