Negative Positive
Title: Poorly reproduced, poorly directed
Review: The copy of this I received, and I assume they are all alike, was very poor in video quality, not even as good as VHS. To add insult to injury, it seemed almost amateurish in direction and editing. While I realize that most films are shot scene by scene, usually clever editing and splicing makes a smoothly flowing final product. This actually looks like something high schoolers would have done with 8mm reels years ago. Hugh Grant is handsome, of course, and at least one of the female actors was very attractive, but looks alone can't save a film. Sorry to be so harsh, but I would say steer clear of this one.
Is the review positive or negative? 