Negative Positive
Title: huh?
Review: It is difficult to believe that the Pulitzer committee would give its prize to such an haphazard collection of wild speculations and outlandish conclusions. Diamond's own political agenda is his business. But passing this book off as some sort of 'scientific' support of those misguided ideals goes beyond the pale. I only hope that anyone else reading this tripe will see through it as easily.
Is the review positive or negative? 