Negative Positive
Title: Great story, lousy edition
Review: Having read earlier reviews about the poor editing in this edition I decided to err on the safe side and got it digitally from my local library. The first few chapters were, if not mistake-free, at least readable. However, the further into the book I read, the more glaring and grating the editing (or lack of editing) errors became. The final straw was "Midman" when referring to "Midway." Don't waste $10 on this edition. Better by far to get your hands on a hard copy. This is a terrific story, thoroughly well-researched and it deserves much better than it's received from these "publishers." That they have the nerve to charge for this is hubris. Poorly, poorly done.
Is the review positive or negative? 