Negative Positive
Title: Blatant errors and haphazard construction
Review: In addition to other comments on the dryness and counterintuitive organization of this book, I must point out that it is poorly edited as well. Many of the blatant typographical errors appear in the first couple chapters, but they continue throughout. Multiple times I have found a quote that doesn't make sense and, upon looking up the source material, discovered that it was improperly transcribed (i.e. "diverse" becomes "divers"; "estopped" becomes "estoppel"; "an" becomes "and"). As a first-year student deciphering dense material, the last thing you need is to second guess the accuracy of the information you receive from your textbooks. I won't give the book 1 star because I've read no other Contracts casebooks for comparison, but I can give an inaccurate, poorly edited text no more than two.
Is the review positive or negative? 