Negative Positive
Title: "a reader" is highly biased reviewer
Review: A quick search shows that "a reader" appears again and again in reviews of books about Darrow, and makes repeated, unsubstantiated and biting attacks on the great trial lawyer. These are obvious vendettas, not reviews worth considering. The reviewer neither identifies himself or herself properly (i.e., doesn't have the courtesy to take ownership of the criticisms); nor is any substantial evidence offered - only thin opinions that appear to be more slander than thoughtful evaluation. Darrow, for all his faults, deserves better treatment!
Is the review positive or negative? 