Negative Positive
Title: Clancy Has Lost The Touch
Review: Tom Clancy has finally run out of things to write. As a (past) Clancy lover, I believe I have every right to stand by that comment. His new book is nothing more than a platform for Clancy to mouth off his half-way thought through political ideas, most of which are unconstitutional. A big military power needing oil? Didn't we see that before? Character development? He completely relies on the development from past books. I can't IMAGINE what someone who has never read Clancy before thought of this. Editing? I wish I had written them down, but the amount of times he repeated lines, anecdotes, and so-called "military jargon" was absurd.I have never wasted so much time. The only reason I even finished the book was to keep with my philosophy that no book is so bad that it can't be finished. This book has made me wonder.
Is the review positive or negative? 