Negative Positive
Title: Documentation?
Review: I am trying to figure out why people are saying this is a well documented book. By today's academic and professional standards of documentation, this book would get an "F". Friedan throws out all kinds of information with no end notes whatsoever. Certainly, she references some magazine articles and studies but in no way does she cover all of her sources. She makes tons of assertions with absolutely no reference to where the information came from.
Is the review positive or negative? 