Negative Positive
Title: Can you say, "Strawman"?
Review: Page after page of vapid ranting relying on ad hominem attacks buttressed by footnotes the National Enquirer would be proud to cite. Not thoughtful, not thought-provoking, but an addition to ditto-head "uh HUH!" conformity to whatever outrage du jour (or du hier, so 1970s are his examples) is promoted by neocon ideologues.There are good conservative writers out there; Flynn is not one of them.
Is the review positive or negative? 