Negative Positive
Title: was director on meds when commentary was done?
Review: was the guy drunk, under heavy medication--or was it done post lobotomy?hey, I have nothing against booze--or whatever it is that people do; that's their own business...but if you're going to do commentary on a film that people have paid money for...how about making it coherent, buddy? how about making some sense? how about better sound and cleaner/clearer sentences?is that too much to ask?the slurring, mumbling thing went out with Brando (& I respect Brando's acting ability, by the way.)and the fick itself? could have been, should have been a great little horror flick. the premise is there--and terribly botched with poor photography, writing, acting and direction.Like I said: too bad.the single star is for the title.
Is the review positive or negative? 