Negative Positive
Title: The objective turns subjective in the hands of these authors
Review: The authors fail at every turn to display an unbiased view of the world which every critical thinker does best to attain. Instead of being objective and raising questions in a philosophical way, they use their fallacy recognition to present an emotionally charged counter-attack. The authors are outraged at fallacious reasoners and even use emotional language in describing the view of one such reasoner as a "goody-goody idea". One might consider these authors unqualified to write such a book intended to promote objective reasoning. I suggest a more logical and unbiased work on the subject, such as _The_Art_of_Deception_.
Is the review positive or negative? 