Negative Positive
Title: This is the standard for a reason
Review: The book is kept up to date. I provides enough depth to get the engineer to breadboard stage for most types of problems, no more. Examples are almost all pertinent to the kinds of problems rocket engineers will face. It assumes the reader has a basic engineering course background in dynamics (solid, aero-, and thermo-) and a working grasp of math up to calculus, but not more. The best uses are for someone who wants a general overview of rocket propulsion, or as the backbone of a longer course of study that includes other, more specialized and in-depth texts.
Is the review positive or negative? 