Negative Positive
Title: biased and banal
Review: This author has no real concept of the medieval ages, basing his text on what can only be seen as stereotypes. The author frequently gets his information wrong, and contradicts himself when it is convenient for his exploitative text. As another reader put it, this is "tabloid literature" at it's finest. He uses the outdated method of progressive history and speaks in dull metaphors of darkness and light. Read this book only if you want trite and cliché nonsense about an extremely interesting period of history. Absolute trash.
Is the review positive or negative? 