Negative Positive
Title: Bad theories and even worse writing
Review: As usual, Charen is preaching to the converted here. This is not thoughtful political science but merely repitition of common right wing dogma to a willing right wing audience guaranteed to buy this book. It is definitely not something for the middle ground independent thinker. Case in point:Charen hates the 1960's-especially the various civil rights crusades and especiallly feminism. Yet she refuses to recognize that the credit goes to liberals and feminists that Charen is in the position she personally enjoys.Feminists insisted that women be permitted to participate in society and realize their full potential as equals to men. There were not any significant female political columnists and well known female political writers such as Charen before the feminist movement. I was there and I am old enough to remember. Also I found at least four grammatical errors in this book. It got increasingly sloppy when you got near the end.
Is the review positive or negative? 