Negative Positive
Title: Unconvincing, poorly edited, dull, confusing......
Review: What was Cornwell thinking? She might really have something with her Sickert theory but the organization of the information in this book is so poor, I really can't tell. If she plans to continue writing in this vein I would suggest a rudimentary college course in historical research/presentation. This thesis would have garnered an "F" in my class.
Is the review positive or negative? 