Negative Positive
Title: Some good ideas, but lacks subtlety
Review: I thought the whole premise of the book was interesting. Rand objected to the belief that economic freedom should be sacrificed to some vague higher goal of "fairness" or "brotherhood" or "leveling the playing field". But I don't agree with her extreme philosophy of "every man for himself, let the strongest and smartest survive." I was quite disappointed that someone who was supposed to be so smart and such a deep thinker didn't argue both sides, or apply her philosophy in a more subtle, complex manner. It was more just "You're a loser if anything you do is not motivated by self-interest." One can't really enjoy the book, or be provoked to thought, because the book is so overstated, black-and-white, villain vs. superhero.
Is the review positive or negative? 