Negative Positive
Title: HAM STROKER'S DRACULA
Review: I am amazed at the excellent reviews this movie received. Palance, who is perhaps one of the most over rated actors, delivers a ham handed rendition of Dracula. The look is all wrong, he would make a much better Frankenstein monster--without makeup. He does not exude the charm, the sophistication of Dracula as did Lee or Lugosi, but instead comes off as a semi-articulate thug in a poor version of evening dress. A couple of steals in this version from Return of Dracula and Horror of Dracula, but there's no blood to this vampire, just blah. Waste of time.
Is the review positive or negative? 