Negative Positive
Title: This Tabloid Journalism Has Feet Of Clay
Review: On the face of it the author makes it appear that he has a well-researched and persuasive case. Profscam is a sloppy and misleading diatribe. A professor myself, I am the subject of one of his claims. I looked into the note that he used to support his claim in my case and found the citation date to be ten months off for the referenced article (Chapter Five, #9, dated January when the publication was the following November). The quote cited was taken out of context and the cited article was decidedly positive while Sykes has tried to make it appear negative. This work is suspect and I am surprised and disappointed in those who have embraced its message. The careful reader will be able to deconstruct the author's real intent only to discover that the exercise was a waste of time.
Is the review positive or negative? 