Negative Positive
Title: Did John Sandford Really Write This?
Review: After reading this , I'm convinced some guy who has it in for the real John Sandford somehow got this book published under his name. It seems almost impossible that the same author who turns out the great "Prey" series could also be responsible for this. Weak , unexplored characters, a uninvolving plot and a "who cares?" resolution makes this the worst book I've read in awhile. I can understand how an author can get sick of writing the same characters over and over and want to try something new, but this entry was just a wasted effort. I don't mean to sound so brutal, but I can't fathom how someone can write such consistently excellent books like the "Prey " novels and then turn around and write something so terrible.
Is the review positive or negative? 