Negative Positive
Title: Clancy didn't write (or even read) this book...
Review: The 2 possible scenerios:1) Either Clancy didn't write this book, and then was too busy to read it or 2) He fired his editor, and now we know who the real talent is.The book is unbelieveably repetitive: it could have been written in half the pages. There are technical errors not worthy of a Clancy novel. The re-use of phrases ("faster then closing a zipper" and "niggeredly" were both used 4 times that I counted) made me scream. And Tom, Richmond is not a borough of New York.This is the worst book of all time.
Is the review positive or negative? 