Negative Positive
Title: More rehash from Roeper
Review: In his usual fashion, Richard Roeper again presents information he has gathered from other sources and tries to appear to be an expert on the subject. RR may be able to compile lists, but a true movie critic takes the time to explain his views. It is not difficult to prepare a list such as "Worst Movie Sequels" and then not explain what makes them bad. Roeper is capitalizing on the celebrity status he has fallen into since he has been paired with Roger Ebert. He is not a movie critic. He's a leech that Ebert has taken along for the ride.
Is the review positive or negative? 