Negative Positive
Title: Grisham is getting sloppy
Review: The same book by any other author's name might have never made it to the bookstores. It is implausible, lacks depth both in terms of characters and plot and is, above all, sloppy. It gives the impression of a job half-done to meet a deadline. Although it reads easily there is an empty aftertaste and a question "what was that about". I think Grisham should choose another nom de plume and start over again as his name is slowly becoming a liability.
Is the review positive or negative? 