Negative Positive
Title: Repetitive, xenophobic, narrowminded; is this really Clancy?
Review: The first Clancy book I read (13 years ago) was pure bliss. Unfortunately, the last four have declined in content in a predictable slope until this one which falls off the cliff and proclaims it's superiority on the way down.There are so many things to criticize in this pile that I prefer not to waste anymore time (some of my precious life went to reading this thing after all) and just point out that the first 800 pages could have been condensed into 40 to 60, tops.Although I agree with much of his politics, it is sufficient for him to mention only once(if at all) what his characters feel about a certain subject; after that, most of us should be able to retain the wisdom he grants us from on high.The more I write the more I realize how much I hated this book.I'll end it here and take back the 1 star I so graciously bestowed. UUUUUGGGGGHHHHHH!
Is the review positive or negative? 