Negative Positive
Title: Not Skeptical Enough
Review: It is one thing to challenge orthodoxy; doing so is an often brave and heroic endeavour. This book, however, is intellectual dishonest and scientifically sloppy. Too bad, a book which truly challenged some of the claims of environmentalists with serious science could be very useful and could help foster constructive debate. This book does none of that. It is so obviously based on imprecise arguments and distorted 'facts' that no serious debate could possibly ensue, except perhaps how it got published.
Is the review positive or negative? 