Negative Positive
Title: Surprisingly biased polemic attacks scientific debate.
Review: I was surprised when I read this book that its arguments amounted to no more than serial ad hominem attacks on the motives of anyone who disagreed with the global warming hypothesis--this is advocacy journalism at its worst. As a scientist (and amateur climatologist), I would really like to have recommended this book, but the issues are not presented in a rational and balanced fashion. The people criticized here actually come across as far more impartial (read S. FredSinger or Patrick Michaels or Thomas Gale Moore) Try these titles::Climate of Fear : Why We Shouldn't Worry About Global Warming; Thomas Gale MooreHot Talk Cold Science : Global Warning's Unfinished Debate; Singer, et alSound and Fury : The Science and Politics of Global Warming; Patrick J. Michaels
Is the review positive or negative? 