Negative Positive
Title: Why the Hoopla?
Review: I managed to reach well into middle age before I finally picked up this book that I've heard so much about since my teen years. I disliked reading books back then. In my 30's, when my passion for reading ignited, "Catcher" just was not on my personal list. I finally picked up a copy and plowed through it. What's the point? It was a nice coming of age story, but nothing special. The main character was someone whom I would like to avoid had he been a real, live presence in the world. In short, "Catcher" wasn't worth my time. I can see why J.D. Salinger is one of the most noted recluses. I'd be embarrassed, too.
Is the review positive or negative? 