Negative Positive
Title: An Important Topic, but there's not much real dialogue here
Review: This is an extremely important topic, and it is interesting (even intriguing) to read Sanders' and Fackre's atypical views on this subject. However, Nash does not make a positive case -- WHICH IS EXTREMELY FRUSTRATING! Both Fackre and Sanders readily express their frustration with it, which can only lead the reader to exasperation. If you want to engage this issue, check this book out only for its bibliography. You also may want to read Fackre's argument as it is intriguing and well-written -- you'll never read First Peter again quite the same way...
Is the review positive or negative? 