Negative Positive
Title: a website would be more useful
Review: This is not the sort of book that people are likely to read, cover to cover, as though it were a novel or classroom text. [Though for the latter, how many actually do anyway?]It is a continuing puzzle why books like these get printed. Given its subject, it would seem far better for Hudson or his publisher to simply maintain a website with the information. Which could be kept up to date and offer rich searching options. Whereas for the latter, any book only has an index. Plus, the website can of course link to the many Internet sources it cites. More convenient for the reader.
Is the review positive or negative? 