Negative Positive
Title: Go for a walk instead
Review: The basic idea of the book, some alt history scenarios as mind candy for people interested in it, is laudable. However its execution and therefore the book is ridiculous at best, if not outright damnable.Two of the scenarios, 1866 and 1916, are actually quite interesting and would have deserved better, grammatically correct English would have been a first step. Some are downright silly like Napoleon Bonaparte as third president of the US; others are absolute crap and read like the wet dream of an old Nazi.What hurts is the total disregard for facts. To give one example: Napoleon Bonaparte, born in 1769, could not have been a candidate for president in 1804. For that you have to be 40. And so on, and so on ...So my advice for prospective readers: go for a walk instead.
Is the review positive or negative? 