Negative Positive
Title: EXPECTED MORE BASED ON THE TITLE
Review: This work is nothing more than a drawn on essay where it would be better suited as a single chapter in a true defensive handgunning text. The author who claims to have pioneered "Point Shooting" tends to repeat his methodology throughout the text whos subject (Instinct Combat Shooting) is simply point shooting renamed. It does serve in an introductory capacity for point shooting, however lacks the detail and diversity of methods employed by a multitude of ancillary police handgun courses. Based on the title this is what I had expected to read, however I was introduced to nothing new. Also lacks illustrations and photos to reinforce the technique.
Is the review positive or negative? 