Negative Positive
Title: poorly written, inconsistent
Review: For a book that is criticizing Dan Brown's accuracy, I found this book poorly written and containing many mistakes. Did they rush to publish this before editing? Mistakes such as claiming that the first crusades were ordered by Urban II in 1145, or claiming that "symbology" is not a real word. At other times sentences and phrases are so jumbled that you cannot understand the meaning after re-reading 3 or 4 times.I love Rough Guides, but this book was poorly edited and I expect better from this publisher.
Is the review positive or negative? 