Negative Positive
Title: I hope the editor went unpaid.
Review: An interesting and informative if not substantive book. This isn't a complaint, I knew this when I bought it. What I did not know is that it would be so rife with errors. I am on page 52 of the book and have found no less than 5 of them, mostly grammatical.Publishing companies: please, please hire competent editors who have some background in the English language and are also somewhat familiar with the material that is being edited.Here's a real gem, pretty much indicative of the quality of information that is sometimes passed off in the text: "Microsoft, (upon creating windows), could guarantee that billions of dollars of software and business data already created under DOS wouldn't still be usable."Think you were looking for "would" there, chief.So what parts of this book do I trust as fact and not a typo?
Is the review positive or negative? 