Negative Positive
Title: Opinion v. Research
Review: If only the author had came clean and offered his book up as "possible" solutions or alternatives or opinions instead of trying to convince his readers that his "findings" were the results of forensic research data analysis or anthropological findings/discoveries untold for centuries. He plays on the minds of the gullible. For example, Jesus faked His death? Good one! Dogs ate His body? And did not leave any trace of their deed? I guess dogs were different back then. It was sad to read other reviews of readers who said they enjoyed the indepth analysis and pro and con discussion the author provided. Personally, I can get the same type of reading in line at the grocery store reading the front page of the tabloids! This book had as much credibility as those rags do too. Beware!
Is the review positive or negative? 