Negative Positive
Title: Conventional Ecumenical Pluralist Post-Colonial Liberalism for ContempMod Consumption
Review: In all loving honesty and forthrightness, I feel this is a grossly outrageous misreading of Jesus' own statements. It twists and warps selected quotations of our Lord. It strangely leaves out troublesome quotes that don't fit Mr. McLaren's filtration system of maximum tolerability for his brand of compromised pan-inclusive non-conclusive Christianity.Little more than conventional liberal religious belief in angry frustrated denial of clear Bible truth statements couched in false humility. With so much re-thinking of who Jesus really is and how he really means to be interpreted, an uncautious sophisticate intellectual can rethink himself right out of Christ and into antichrist. So openminded and freethinking as to slide out of the Goodspell (Gospel) of Jesus and into the Badspell of Dan Brown.
Is the review positive or negative? 