Negative Positive
Title: How do you define "atheist"?
Review: This book confirms my own experience that most of the people who declare themselves "atheists" are in fact "anti-religionists" which I think is a much more accurate term. Anyone can focus on the hypocrisy of churchgoers and the unbelievability of miracles which require suspending the laws of thermodynamics--but let's remember that religions are man made. To believe that there is not a creative intelligence in the universe is to believe that an explosion in a print shop can produce Webster's unabridged dictionary. Or, if you are an "evolutionary" atheist, that a billion explosions over a million years will in fact produce an unabridged dictionary. Thus argument is more ludicrous than many of the miracles which many religions proclaim.
Is the review positive or negative? 