Negative Positive
Title: Depends so much on how one sees from where one is
Review: I read one of the comments, decided to pass. The other, hesitated. Finally got the book. Aryadeva tersely centers on some points one rejects. It has an effect of not very savoury medecine. Gyel-tsap comments I find clear and funny, and I like his comparisons, often not understood. Geshe Sonam's comments are simple and discreete, and the translator has formal english.So is it Aryadeva's, Gyel-tsap's, Geshe Sonam Rinchen's or the translator's fault? None, I think. This is not about expounding Nagaruja philosophy, nor emphasizing some points as Chandakirti.It is a more like closing arguments, a little wild, nailing it.
Is the review positive or negative? 