Negative Positive
Title: Materialism run amok
Review: The author attempts to explain changes in the geopolitical environment through evolution. This explanation is both materialistic in its view of human society and stands unproven by the author. While the author uses the term evolution with abandon, he never explains why evolution is the explanation. Furthermore, he never deals with the moral consequences of essentially accepting social Darwinism as true. The author sees something happening in geopolitics but he can't explain it effectively. Still better off reading Clausewitz.
Is the review positive or negative? 