Negative Positive
Title: What Would it Matter?
Review: It's like arguing the point of the sexual orientation of staphylococcus aureus: a digression from its primary import. Likewise was Hitler's meatless and alcohol free diet. To investigate the behavioral incidentals of a monster trivializes its monstrousness and can only make it appear not quite so monstrous. Preventing the recurrence of such a monster is paramount and is not served by examining what was not so monstrous.
Is the review positive or negative? 