Negative Positive
Title: Something you should know before reading this book
Review: This book does not reflect official doctrine of the church. It was written and published independently by Orson Pratt, it was never an official church publication. Even at the time of it's publication the book did not do well, circulation peaked at only 400 copies, and Orson Pratt lamented to his brother parley "The world will not subscribe for nor read The Seer". In 1865, twelve years after its first publication, the first presidency officially disowned the book stating "The Seer [and other writings by Pratt] contain doctrines which we cannot sanction, and which we have felt impressed to disown, so that the Saints who now live, and who may live hereafter, may not be misled by our silence, or be left to misinterpret it. Where these objectionable works, or parts of works, are bound in volumes, or otherwise, they should be cut out and destroyed."
Is the review positive or negative? 