Negative Positive
Title: Two years and this is it?
Review: Writer spends two years with the team yet offers about as much "inside" information as a guy who sells cars down the street at Rodmans. Obviously aimed at the masses, but a book like this has a much narrower audience and the authour fails miserably. Lazy writing, factual errors, you name it.Where's Michael Lewis - Moneyball when you need him? THERE was a book that was so in depth, so appealingly detailed it ATTRACTED the masses. Holley was a lazy hack with the Globe, he's a lazy hack here, and he's now a lazy hack on the radio.Somebody petition his editors for his notes so maybe we can learn some information we don't know besides Charlie Weis saying Patrick Pass can't play. Save the money, send me an email and I'll give you the book for free.
Is the review positive or negative? 