Negative Positive
Title: British writer defending British explorer
Review: What a biased load of baloney! Typical British attitude that because he was British, he was the better man even though he screwed up everything he touched, AND was beaten to the pole by Amundsen. Apparently, Amundsen's sins included planning his whole trip with an actual clue about what he was doing, unlike Scott. I don't believe I have ever read a book based on a more ridiculous or indefensible premise. Do yourself a favor, read one of the other accounts of this trip, or even one about Shackleton and the Endurance.
Is the review positive or negative? 