Negative Positive
Title: poorly written with inaccurate tech details
Review: Reads like a high schooler's zombie fan fiction. I get that it wasn't written by a "professional" but the journal format is just an excuse for the author to write badly and mix up homophones. "To" for "too", "lightening" for "lightning", "breaks" for "brakes", it goes on and on. Get an editor. What was the point of the girl rescued from the car? I think she disappeared at one point for like 50 pages.For a story so hung up on technical details it's surprising that there wasn't more accuracy in the aviation bits. As a flight instructor myself these are somewhat glaring errors. According to the author, the hydraulic brakes in a Cessna 172 don't work too well when the engine's off. Oh really. There are lots of little mistakes like this that show the author's lack of research and attention to details.
Is the review positive or negative? 