Negative Positive
Title: Delicate Sound of Plunder
Review: I don't want to take anything away from Gilmour, Wright, and Mason. I think they are fine musicians. But, the truth is that Roger Waters was the core creative force (conceptualist, lyricist) of the band. With Waters gone it is not the same band. To me it is unethical to make a career based on the public's past perception. Sure, they contributed to the music. But they are not just playing the music. The older material relies heavily on lyrical content and even their current stage show, inflatable pig, circular screen, etc. was conceived by Waters early on. I'm sorry, but to use Pink Floyd as a product name to sell records and tickets is WRONG and you, the consumer, should be offended. I would feel the same way if Roger Waters called his new band "Pink Floyd". They were a great team. Apart from each other they are not Pink Floyd.
Is the review positive or negative? 