Negative Positive
Title: Typical inconclusive, and credential lacking Bigfoot documentary.
Review: This documentary is just like all the other documentaries I've seen on the History Channel or Unsolved Mysteries etc.There is no scientific data ever shown in the film. They talk about all this conclusive DNA from hair samples,a hand and a leg that were found. The data they claim proves it is non-human or is not any known primate. So wouldn't the scientist that made the study be really eager to talk about finding the DNA of a new species? There is not one scientist, archeologist or anyone with a non red neck background that is interviewed in this film. Tom Biscardi's only credentials are self given.I love the big foot controversy, but this doesn't give any useful information. So watch for entertainment only.
Is the review positive or negative? 