Negative Positive
Title: Another corrupt Alaskan bear book
Review: In 'Some Bears Kill: True Life Tales of Terror' the author weaves grand tales of survival (or not) with the nidus being the so called predictability of killer bears. This is like writing a terror book about "crazy electrons" in an atom, by hearing about fusion and extrapolating the experience to all situations. Bears are bears, some are smart, some not so, some are hungry, some not so, and so on. They're beautiful and to be taken with respect and simply not to be feared, like this author seems to contrive. This book I read to be entertained, and it only retold old stories that would be exchanged after a few too many beers during a long winter in King Salmon. No one should take this effort seriously.
Is the review positive or negative? 