Negative Positive
Title: Sort on facts. Long on bias
Review: Like many I read this book based on the recommendation of friends who felt it was a shocking exposure of the food inductry that offered a path to the salvation of mankind. I made it to about page six when I recognized that the "facts" had either been cherry picked from questionable sources or had been invented by the author. That does not mean that everything in the book is necessarily untrue, but it does mean that anyone familiar with agriculture in this country cannot accept this book that is being presented as nonfiction. This author has an agenda and appparently will do whatever is needed to excited those who lack knowledge and will sell books. The author quickly loses all credibility, which makes it impossible for me to accept anything he has written.
Is the review positive or negative? 