Negative Positive
Title: Vacuous attempt to cash in on Blink
Review: LeGault gives the idea that he's writing something self-consciously rebutting, or at least responding to, Gladwell's _Blink_.He isn't. Don't buy this book thinking that you're getting an informed perspective on the psychology, decision theory, pedagogy, or historical study of problem-solving or critical reasoning. It is none of those things. It is a rambling, tedious, conservative diatribe against "political correctness", social programs, and other neo-con bugbears.If you want Coulter-lite, this book is perfect for you. If you want an educated, coherent discussion of critical thinking or sound decision-making, save your money for Thomas Gilovich's _How We Know What Isn't So_, or Max Bazerman's _Judgment in Managerial Decision Making_.
Is the review positive or negative? 