Negative Positive
Title: Why Believe Anonymous Sources At All Or Writers?
Review: Fiction is easy read and anonymous sources are hard to confirm, so why would anyone read a book with less journalistic standards of a cheap tabloid? I read it, I question it and I cannot respect someone who went on TV and claimed Clinton's innocences only later to write a book about Clinton's cover up! If he had such information at that time he should have reported it, if he didn't and now does why print it? The hypocrisy of this former Naval Intelligence Officer turned journalist has no bounds. Neither does this book, therefore place it where it belongs, next to the scandal sheets or under them which ever, it does not matter, it lacks the very integrity it calls for by others. Save your money wait for the movie which will be more inaccurate, you can bet on it.
Is the review positive or negative? 