Negative Positive
Title: Smoot must hate to do research
Review: There are available sources which give accurate descriptions, and historical/geological information which Smoot could have used, but apparently was too lazy to research... or chose not to document in this *book.* This book contains poor photos, errors and omissions which do not occur in REAL guide books. This book reads like a land developer wrote it... and in fact , smootian-sell-the-outdoors-for-money seems to be the only thing this pile-of-pages seems to achieve. Writers like this are the same types who deny the holocaust.
Is the review positive or negative? 