Negative Positive
Title: Probably not what you're looking for...
Review: If you're looking for an objective view of how to 'de-code' the Da Vinci Code, this is not the book for you. This is obvious from the author's own adamant verbiage, such as 'This is simply not true' and the fact that she does not always provide historical data to support her argument. Welborn tends to focus on tedious and irrelevant parts of the book. Teabing tells Sophie that the Bible was not 'faxed down from heaven' and according to Welborn's brilliant revelation, this is 'not news to us.' Well... duh. Thanks for clearing that one up. Robert Langdon is a professor of Religious Symbology, which Welborn chooses to remind us doesn't exist at Harvard. Why is Welborn picking apart character development now? Dan Brown is clearly pushing for an Indiana Jones-type character, which works just fine. I blame myself for purchasing this book, since I failed to research the author.
Is the review positive or negative? 