Negative Positive
Title: Typos mar a version with too little detail
Review: You can strip things down too far. This book takes too much out, and the edition I read (the first half of, anyway) had too many typos to be useful for the intended audience -- people who really don't know the material yet, or haven't looked at it in a long time. This is an embarrassment to the Schaum series, which otherwise I like very much.
Is the review positive or negative? 