Negative Positive
Title: Mostly opinion and useless commentary--few useful facts
Review: If one wants to find out how Garrison's investiagtion progressed, what it came up with, or who, using incestuous intelligence community ties to the media (and millions of our tax dollars) tried to stop it at every turn, it is best to read his own account, such as "On the Trail of the Assassins" or "A Heritage of Stone". "False Witness" is an apparent attempt to keep anyone from reading Garrison's books, and thus finding out about the real story behind the JFK assassination, by using opinion, hearsay, and sidetracking the subject with useless facts, such as the makeup of Garrison's office, etc.. If you read Garrison's books first, you will know why "False Witness" was written. If one wants to find the truth about the JFK assassination read Garrison's books...
Is the review positive or negative? 