Negative Positive
Title: Could have been much better if not nearly illiterate
Review: This was a fun book to read. Or it might have been. I heard about this book on a talk show interview with Greg Kihn and thought it sounded interesting. When I started to read it, I actually had to put it down and back away for a while. John Darling obviously never passed this literary gem through ANY sort of grammatical or editorial review process. Inappropriate (I mean words that should have been typos, except they happen to accidentally be whole words) word choices and grammatically nonsensical sentences abound. I finally DID complete the book, but only after deciding to ignore spelling, punctuation and a rather scattershot approach. Maybe I just wasn't drunk enough. There is a lot of information here, but I had to question just how much is based in real research as opposed to just browsing the band's website.
Is the review positive or negative? 