Negative Positive
Title: needs help...
Review: This book is a flipped pyramid.The whole construction stands (?)on very unsure-unverified (maybe) facts (well, no, there isn't any).Each hypothesis get used in the next chapter as an evidence to prove (?) other hypothesis which again are presented as evidences for the next one...I'ts a circular mythomaniac way of thinking.Very-very dispointing, because when questions are indeed valuable....author's answers are so poorly built-up that it destroys the validity of the question itself.Avoid it as History book.Read it as a novel.
Is the review positive or negative? 