Negative Positive
Title: A travesty of a biography
Review: An awful "biography" by and awful "author". This man wrote this biography to cash in on the death of Brett when it was originally released in 1997. The writer even admits that most if not all of Bretts friends and family refused to even speak with him, and those that did remain unnamed. There is no effort put into the research necessary, or the writing. It's evident from the number of easily checked factual errors. The author even goes as far as to describe Brett's death from Brett's "point of view." This is not how a biography should read.
Is the review positive or negative? 