Negative Positive
Title: Bad evidence and faulty logic result in a poor argument.
Review: I consider Kinman's attempt to explain "The New World Order" a comedy. Kinman's idea of "proof" consists of unsubstantiated "facts" followed by questionable interpretations. For example, if you look at the context of many of his quotes pertaining to the UN Charter, you can see that the stated purpose, goals, and methods of the UN are nothing like whate Kinman tries to plant in your mind. The outlandish claims, quasi-based on the Bible, (a version of) history, and current events ring of lunacy.As with anything, read it with a critical eye.
Is the review positive or negative? 