Negative Positive
Title: Bogus History
Review: Pseudo-history has never been my thing, and I'm upset that I bought this book before understanding its true nature. Having become increasingly uneasy with the flimsy "evidence" presented to back up his theory while reading, I was devastated to find out Mr Menzies is essentially a liar (please see other reviews for more details). Sad to know I contributed to this by purchasing a copy... even more sad to see that the barriers for what counts as 'history' to the pub have been lowered substantially.
Is the review positive or negative? 