Negative Positive
Title: Narrow Focus and Poorly Written
Review: Originally written as a college paper, this book takes the author's personal beliefs and poorly attempts to make them the entire history of a loosely defined set of musical and cultural styles that began probably long before the author was old enough to speak. He's a hippie punk with crusty leanings, which means love, peace, anarchy and not bathing too often, and the whole history of punk is redefined to the point of pretending most everything else doesn't exist.It's hysterical reading his mental gymnastics when describing Anarchy as both violent and peaceful. This book is soooooooo poorly done. It's not a history at all, but an editorial steeped in wishful thinking and limited mental resources.
Is the review positive or negative? 