Negative Positive
Title: PAID FOR BY THE CIA ?
Review: This reader and viewer feels that the basis to the JFK film drama comes down to the question of whether Clay Shaw lied about the fact that he WAS paid by the CIA, yet portrayed himself as just a business man. Lambert argues about the side stuff...creating yet more smoke and mirrors in her False Witness.Makes some wonder just exactly WHO is paid by the CIA? Which portrayer of events and which writer, Lambert? Which business person or publisher? It is intriguing that so much effort was put into this book. Who protests too much? For whose benefit?Perhaps Lambert should take on someone else to test her ability with analysis, meaningful and meticulous detail. How about "9/11" and Noam Chomsky, or "9/11 The big Lie" and Thierry Meyssan?On second thought, perhaps such additional rebuttal, of those who dare question the official line, is a task that makes Lambert's interests too obvious.
Is the review positive or negative? 