Negative Positive
Title: Two can't keep a secret when one is dead
Review: Noll spends half his time setting Jung up as a paper tiger and the other half knocking him down. When the author can't find anything more to write about Jung, he writes about Jung's patients instead, extrapolating a grandiose scheme for world domination from the smallest of evidence. If these patients were truly mentally ill, how can their perceptions be trusted. And if they weren't ill why would they enter into therapy with someone like Noll's Jung? Noll states at the end of the book that he had found no evidence that Jung was ever a Nazi, but if that's the case, why even bring the point up. I found the book very disappointing, not so much for Noll's praising Jung with the faintest of damns, but for failing to deliver the goods--a secret life worthy of the name.
Is the review positive or negative? 