Negative Positive
Title: Horrible. Absolutley horrible.
Review: This movie was revolting. The people that made it should be ashamed.These wonderful works by Clive Barker have been violated by this movie. I am proud of Clive Barker for not actually directing this.It never touched on a single actual "Book of Blood" which are short stories, since the movie didn't even allude to that.Also, the sex scenes were too racy and normal to even remotely be attached to Clive Barker's name. If you follow his work, you know that it is a rare occurrence that simple heterosexual sex ending in orgasm and a night in bed together happens. Clive usually throws in a cenobite or at least minimal mutilation.I believe that these people that made this movie, slapped "Clive Barker" on the title and figured it would make money. They didn't get my 18 dollars.Also, the "how books of blood were made" idea of the movie, was not enough substance to even make four paragraphs in a book, let alone a movie.I want my two hours back.
Is the review positive or negative? 