Negative Positive
Title: Schippers is a typical prosecutor
Review: Once he gets identifies "side" (the side paying him the money, i.e. the Republican caucus in this case), he simply cannot see the other side of an issue. I understand the concept of zealous prosecution, but Schippers statement that "any sitting President who lies about anything should be impeached" is a fundamental misunderstanding of the Constitution.Schippers presents his own points of view cogently, if rather dryly. But he absolutely fails to see the other side. Fails to understand that good people could disagree with him for good reasons. Anyone who disagrees with his point of view is dubbed "without morals" or a "sellout." This is NOT a balanced view. It's the Prosecutor's view, of why he shouldn't have lost his case.
Is the review positive or negative? 