Negative Positive
Title: Defective had to return it
Review: I wish I hadn't bought this router. I spent eight hours trying to get it to work but couldn't. The *tech* support at d-link was exceptionally bad (as is noted by many other reviewers). In the end they told me I had correctly configured it and it must be defective.Follow up (two days later). I spent another couple of hours trying to get it to work and I glad I did it because a replacement wouldn't have helped. It turns out that the problem lies in the router firmware v. 1.21.It turns out that in some instances You *must* use the router's virtual server to forward ports. The firmware supports direct port forwarding, but direct doesn't work under some scenarios. The only default setting I changed was the router IP (changed from 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.1.1) and I also reserved two IPs.I'm still leaving my rating as a 1. The router is working, but this issue seems to indicate that the firmware wasn't thoroughly regression tested (checked under a wide variety of settings).
Is the review positive or negative? 