Negative Positive
Title: Unbelievably Bad
Review: Easily the most incompetent work of non-fiction I've ever read. The author, Dilorenzo, is not a historian. He is an economist by training and a Libertarian gadfly. And it shows: The perposterous thesis is "supported" if that's the word by inaccurate quotes, quotes taken out of context, and sometimes quotes the author attributes to Lincoln that were actually made by people with whom Lincoln disagreed.
Is the review positive or negative? 