Negative Positive
Title: The worst example of poor scholarship imaginable.
Review: This book is worse than bad. It pretends to have facts yet it provides no evidence for some of the most preposterous lies I have ever seen put to print. It is difficult to imagine how the authors convinced Cambridge University Press to publish such unsubstantiated babble. The book is badly organized as well, and adds nothing to the current literature on this subject. You would be better off buying virtually ANY other title on this subject.
Is the review positive or negative? 