Negative Positive
Title: AMATEURISH
Review: Although the author clearly loves his subject, he is not a good writer. There are awkwardly worded sentences, misspellings, wrong names and dates, and cliché after cliche. This is basically a rehash of the George Eells' chapter that came out decades ago and offers little new information. The photographs are crudely reproduced and look like seventh generation photocopies. Yes, the book is inexpensive, but it looks, feels, and reads like it. This must be a self-published book. The writer clearly needed an editor and a better printer. There's a better book out there.
Is the review positive or negative? 