Negative Positive
Title: revisionist history = zero credibility.
Review: Okay, let's get it straight: Jesus was not married, no matter how much you read The da Vinci Code. At least, the evidence was overwhelming. It's certainly possible, but in His case it's not probable. Like most Jewish holy men of his time, he was celibate. The wedding at Cana was not His, since He stated it's "no business" of His that they ran out of the drinky-drinky. Paul used examples of Jesus' disciple's marriages when defending marriage. If Jesus was married, he would've most likely used, you know, the Son of God's marriage as a good example? But he doesn't. Because He wasn't. Married.There is nothing in the discredited gnostic gospels that say he was married, either. Where does Spong get this idea?Spong just has a chip on his shoulder with conservatives, theologically and politically. Nothing new to see here.
Is the review positive or negative? 