Negative Positive
Title: You can really tell that this was self-published
Review: Yes, granted, I do not agree with her theological concept of the Godhead, but I have seen better pro-trinitarian arguments from oneness preachers! Not to be mean, but you can really tell that this book was self-published (not that I am putting down on self-published books, but truly this was the only way that she could have this on the shelf). She has no clear understanding of oneness thought, Greek, or even Tertullian's Latin. She butchers Magee's book and often goes on rants about things unrelated to the topic at hand. Amazing enough, she is still attending a oneness church, although she is a trinitarian. She never does once approach the topic with any scholarly sense and instead leaves you wondering if she is still on the same topic. If I was a trinitarian, I would, after reading this book, begin to consider a change in my dogma, if, after 1800 years, this is what trinitarian apology has come to. I recommend French's book: "Our God is One"
Is the review positive or negative? 