Negative Positive
Title: You can only wish this album was as good as Jethro Tull's
Review: Now, in the history of rock music (or any other kind), did any "artist" ever get very far by stealing his/her moniker from a more sucessful album?Did you ever hear of Frank Sinatra calling himself "Sketches Of Spain", or Elvis ever going by "Greatest Hits", or the Beatles calling themselves "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band"? - oh, wait a minute...Anyway, my question is - couldn't this guy record under his own name? Isn't his music good enough to stand on it's own without calling to mind one of the best albums of another more sucessful group?I MEAN, HOW ORIGINAL CAN HE BE WHEN HE BLATANTLY STEALS SOMEONE ELSE'S ASSOCIATIVE NAME?Just because of the fact that I can't dis-associate my memory of Jethro Tull's masterpiece from this guy's name-dropping do I say:DON'T BUY THIS ALBUM. IF HE CAN'T RECORD MUSIC UNDER HIS OWN TRUE NAME, HE DOESN'T DESERVE TO BE LISTENED TO!!!
Is the review positive or negative? 