Negative Positive
Title: No substance - a log of history
Review: All throughout the book there is chronic references to the founding fathers of the physics, mathematics and philosophy - no doubt a good coverage - however no original thought. The author rebelliously (only apparent towards the end of the book) tries to refute the most accepted *candidates* for interpretation of quantum mechanics. And tries to offer the rebuttal to the founding fathers of Quantum Mechanic like Bohr, to put forward his naive interpretation. It is not his caliber to attempt this. In all there is no substance to this book, but only a historical log of advances in mathematics, philosophy and physics. Worst of all, again towards the end, one will see the author has an agenda - and yes certainly influenced by his religion.
Is the review positive or negative? 