Negative Positive
Title: A shallow piece of historical pseudoscience
Review: The bible fundamentalists should choose someone else thanMr Kaiser Jr. to defend the idea of the litteral interpretation of the Bible. Mr Kaiser's reasonings are infantile and do very little to support his extremely conservative view. For instance the primacy he claims for textual material (the Bible) over acheological finding ignores the fact that archeology gives information on what happened at the time it happened whereas the biblible is an oral and then written tradition whose earliest exponents are at least one thousand years later than the events they describe.Mi suggestion is not to buy this book
Is the review positive or negative? 