Negative Positive
Title: Good game hobbled by poor management
Review: This game would be fun to play if it hadn't been rushed out the door like it was. Even after two patches, critical issues remain with the AI, the chronometer does not work as advertised, radar and sonar do not work properly, and the measurement system does not work properly when using imperial units. To top it off, due to poor past decisions made by Ubisoft, we are stuck with inappropriate Allied aircraft (Lancasters in the Pacific? LOL), only one fleet carrier for the USN (and an early-war one at that) and medals that are totally fantasy. Had this game been published by anyone else and given proper time to develop, these problems wouldn't exist. As is stands, Silent Hunter 4 1.2 is a good game but still hindered by bugs and omissions that shouldn't have been there to start with.
Is the review positive or negative? 