Negative Positive
Title: Schiller Is a Sloppy Writer and Not Factually Accurate
Review: Although a reasonably well-written book, Schiller's work is sloppy, and not as factually comprehensive as he would have the reader believe. For example, Schiller is strangely silent about the lawsuit brought against Alex Hunter by New York attorney Darnay Hoffman in November 1997. It was front page news nationally for weeks. A shocking oversight for a "careful" researcher, who should know better. It ruined the book for me, knowing he had missed this incident. What else has he left out?
Is the review positive or negative? 