Negative Positive
Title: Poor arguments, manipulated and possibly invented facts makes jack an dull boy.
Review: I have come to expect this sort of stuff from some historians...I could not believe that Nat Geo would actually participate in such a method deviation and fact manipulation. The "real" George Washington, yea right. I no longer feel safe watching history! Every time, I'm like how much are they twisting and fabricating? Soon I will not be sure if everything I know of history is actual or full of....lies. Having discovered several other Nat Geo's accounts to be similar....they seem to be DOUBTABLE, and in the back of my mind, I'm like it's probably full of... Why would they do that to us? What is the point? Perhaps they should be called "National Propaganda Machine of Geography".
Is the review positive or negative? 