Negative Positive
Title: Nice pics, bad start
Review: The other though admitting at least the the debate on evolution is not over, make arbitrary classifications based on what he feels is primitive or more evolved even though it's been shown that what Darwinists understand as "primitive" is not primitive at all, and even though the author nor anyone can show what is more primitive. Further, you can produce a wide variety of more spectacular looking forms from a plainer-looking form, but that doesn't make the more amazing looking thing more advanced (which is really shallow thinking, judging by mere outward appearances, which not surprising to Christians, the Bible forbids, and for common sense reasons).
Is the review positive or negative? 