Negative Positive
Title: An appellate brief with too many facts
Review: As an appellate lawyer, I have seen this before - lots of facts to obscure the absence of legal analysis, or supportive precedent. One must remember that the "statement of facts" is not a statement of facts at all, since there has been no trial, and no factfinding. This gives a totally wrong impression of the judicial process. Thus, as a "book" it has little value. Better to wait until true analysis comes out in book form, with exerpts from what could become known as the "infamous" Starr Report.
Is the review positive or negative? 