Negative Positive
Title: 1 star because 0 isn't an option
Review: First, I should warn you that half of the photography subjects are naked men. (Not my favorite subject.) It wouldn't have been so bad if the other photos were good, but all of the photography was extremely amateurish. It was more like cheap bi-porn than good erotic photography. Out of all the photos there was only one series of 4 shoots that I enjoyed. (The composition seemed to be much better thought out than the other photos and the photographer's "fuzzy" style worked well for the situation. I definitely have a bias towards sharp pictures.)The color seemed especially bad too. I'm not sure if the color was part of the photographer's style or if it was poor printing. Either way I didn't like it.To sum up, the magazine wasn't worth what I paid for it.
Is the review positive or negative? 