Negative Positive
Title: Considered the academic "bible" on Heraclitus
Review: The book contains all of the fragments, and an exhaustive analysis of each one. Some of the commentary can get wordy and focus too much, in my opinion, on the author making it a debate on whether he or his academic peers are correct. But the way the author has grouped the fragments and explains the underlying themes in Heraclitus's philosophy, you can't help but be amazed at the extraordinary insights and poetic genius of Heraclitus. Anyone who needs to study him for a course, or has an extensive interest in the pre-Socratics, this book is essential.
Is the review positive or negative? 