Negative Positive
Title: Isn't it obvious?
Review: A previous reviewer asks what it is about Hannity that leads people to hold polarized views about him and this book?Maybe it's the fact that he's intentionally inflammatory and divisive? The fact that he appears to be incapable of substituting reason for blame, hatred and bigotry?The book is basically the equivalent of my toddler's "Dora The Explorer" doll - a worthless marketing doo-dad foisted off on unsophisticated audiences who will clamor for anything "tied in" to their favorite cartoon.As analysis or journalism or commentary or whatever Hannity claims to offer, it's pretty worthless. Aside from generic neocon rants, Hannity's screed just makes up "facts" as it goes along. There are plenty of intellectually honest, insightful conservative political writers out there; Hannity bears no resemblance to them whatsoever.
Is the review positive or negative? 