Negative Positive
Title: revolutionary?
Review: carl roger's work revolutionized nothing whatsoever, but that's not the problem w/ it. the truth is that he was just a stupid man who thought and wrote w/ utter stupidity, beyond even the theological realm.in his youth nietzsche was immature enough to write an essay attaching david strauss. he was right, though such an effort was hardly worth his time. i think carl rogers is probably the david strauss of our time. that he was highly honored in his life time, and is even today, is a disturbing indication of the sterility of american psychology . carl rogers does not represent a humanistic psychology. the lack of humanism is the major characteristic of his blind optimism.
Is the review positive or negative? 