Negative Positive
Title: Interlinear Old Testament seems error prone
Review: Excited about such a presentation as this interlinear text, I quickly looked up a couple of verses. Since Genesis is available for review, I decided to look there. Genesis 4:1 looked okay. okay now Genesis 3:15 - oops. H7779 (bruise) was incorrectly labeled as H2233 (seed/semen).I'm interested in using a book like this to explore and understand the meaning of the underlying text, but if errors are introduced by the author of this book on the scale that it seems to be based on the sample data, this makes the book, which initially comes across as an authority on the bible, instead be an obstacle to correct learning.How can anyone recommend a reference tool prone to error?
Is the review positive or negative? 