Negative Positive
Title: inefficient way to learn economics
Review: Economics is the study of how to use scarce resources efficiently, or so I'm told by Czar Chasey. Well, my time is a scarce resource and reading these books was not an efficient use. Reading a 10 page article about economics by an economist would have taught me much more (greater benefit) with much less time consumed (less opportunity cost). The books were mildly amusing but not enough to make up for my lost time, which I could have spent doing something far more amusing or learning much more. There, as much as I don't like talking economics, I think I've used its language to prove that these books are wholly uneconomical. I think Henry Spearman would agree.
Is the review positive or negative? 