Negative Positive
Title: Misleading title and premise
Review: Very disappointed with this book. As a trainer in critical thinking and problem solving, I am always looking for fresh perspectives. The author makes a good case for improving the discipline of critical thinking in the first chapter and then goes on to violate the very principles he espouses, namely evidence, exploration before concluding and rationality. Other reviewers have noted the numerous hypocritical and agenda-driven aspects to this book, so I will not duplicate. The saddest part about this book is that the people who read it and really believe that he is using critical thinking throughout are being grossly misled and therefore will be reinforced in their views. It does a great disservice to promoting the true discipline of critical thinking.
Is the review positive or negative? 