Negative Positive
Title: Drivel
Review: Thoroughly dissapointing. Alschuler starts out with hard science and ends with debunking driven by inductive logic. It became painful to finish and left me with a sense of loss, of my time and money. He even has the audacity to question the integrity of Dr. John Mack and Bud Hopkins. Both of which have dedicated thier lives to the subject while maintaining open minds and objectivity. Alschuler clearly has done neither. He fortifies the argument that our scientific community isn't well along toward better understanding of the nature of the universe but that our scientific community is but a mear toenail removed from the dark ages.Amazon.com's Rob Lightner says that Alschuler tackles the issue of UFOs without dammaging his credibility. How could anyone that relies upon this many assumptions rooted in rudimentary paradigms have credibility?
Is the review positive or negative? 