Negative Positive
Title: Broad overview with no strong thesis
Review: Tushnet knows his subject, The Supreme Court, extremely well. No doubt about that. I did not like the way the book was put together and found it hard to follow what Tushnet's ideas were that he was trying to get across. Although he's very knowledgeable , I don't think this is a book that adds a lot of value or knowledge to the subject: specifically the Renquist Court. I think many other books on the court and individual essays on it's members would be better and more easily accessible to the layman.
Is the review positive or negative? 