Negative Positive
Title: Taken in
Review: Another example of a publisher (and author) capitalizing on fame. Perfect Storm was great - Fire isn't. Just because Junger had a blockbuster is no reason to republish a bunch of old magazine articles and call it a book. There's a reason no one ever heard of Junger before Perfect Storm: his articles were nothing special, so why make a book out of them. This limp hardcover is the worst case of bait and switch I've ever seen in the publishing business. I got ripped off. Don't get fooled into thinking this is remotely like the Perfect Storm, or for that matter, a real book.
Is the review positive or negative? 