Negative Positive
Title: Its a fiction not a research into history
Review: Going through the book makes one wonder if the author James Laine ever referred to the references listed at the end of the book. Its surprising that people claiming themselves to be scholars can come up with such a load of false claims, historical blunders to say the least. Read in a news article that Laine himself admits that he has very cavalierly presented gossip and innuendo without an iota of documentary substantiation, and then on that basis, proceeded to construct his flawed thesis.You are better off without wasting time and money on this book.
Is the review positive or negative? 