Negative Positive
Title: Book in need of an editor
Review: This was a book with much potential that missed the mark. What could have been an intelligent look behind the scenes came off as a prissy, uptight, whine-fest. Alldrich sites somelaughable petty greivances among the real ones.Going in, I knew it was a book with a slant and accepted that with an open mind. Upon reading, I felt it needed a better editor to tighten up the truth from editorial griping.He repeatedly states that his job was to issue a background check/report, without conclusions or judgement, for others to evaluate. Then he gives sample reports at the end on the Clintons; full of petty commentary. A good editor should have had him doing some rewrites.
Is the review positive or negative? 