Negative Positive
Title: Can do without
Review: It is a shame that Stephen Michaud let Roy Hazelwood contribute to this book. If Stephen Michaud would have done it alone, I think it would have been great. Unfortunately that was not the case.For those who have not read Roy Hazelwood's work, let me explain that it has been my experience as hard core criminology and profile researcher, that his books are more about him and his ego (if you will) then the subject itself.Roy Hazelwood needs to concentrate on setting constructive examples of his very broad and interesting experience...yet we only get information from him like we are reading a resume.Other then that, The book has some good information, but if you have other books from Stephen Michaud, you will see some repetition. Not a must.
Is the review positive or negative? 