Negative Positive
Title: how projections and hurt feelings write a book
Review: an atrocious bunch of lies, innuendoes and half-truths rush toprint aided by the New York Times book review, noted Jung-hater. One of the most irresponsible books to hit the presses in recent years, itmasquerades as science in areas that most would not be able tochallenge. And like the DaVinci Code (that at least has the grace to call itself fiction), Noll calls into question sacred cows. Noll obviously has a vendetta and is out to discredit and smear Jung. Reader beware! BS camouflaged as "scientific research".
Is the review positive or negative? 