Negative Positive
Title: Full of cliche anecdotal generalizations
Review: In my opinion the author uses anecdotal information to support sweeping, and oten stunningly cliche, generalizations. Too poorly supported to be considered a scientific text, and two scattered to be a good overview of creativity, this book is largely a stew of factoids. If I had not read a few texts on creativity prior to this one, I would have had a hard time picking out the germain points in the book. A much better overview of creativity can be found in R. Keith Sawyer's 'Explaining Creativity.'
Is the review positive or negative? 