Negative Positive
Title: It's decent for a cheap point and shoot
Review: I typically shoot with digital SLRs and wanted a decent point and shoot that was small, cheap, and had decent image quality. This camera is small, cheap, and has... good enough image quality. It's touted as having great low-light capabilities, but the quality at ISO 1600 and ISO 2000 is crap. Other than that, it suffers from the same problems that just about every camera in this class does: very little manual control, no RAW, etc.Don't get me wrong: I really like this camera. I think I just have a chip on my shoulder about the state of the point and shoot market. If you want a point and shoot, this is a very good one. If you pre-focus, the shutter is remarkably responsive. The video quality is pretty good. While ISO 1600 may be noisy, ISO 400 is better than most P&S; cams.
Is the review positive or negative? 