Negative Positive
Title: The Inside Story of a Delusion
Review: Schippers in this book appears convinced that one ought to be able to impeach a president based upon secret evidence stored in a secret evidence room. He waxes indignant at the unwillingness of Senators to travel to the House's secret evidence room to view such evidence.He never explains why such evidence was not presented when the House controlled the process. As an attorney, surely Schippers knows that we do not convict defendants of crimes in this country based upon secret evidence in secret evidence rooms. What was he thinking?This book doesn't go far enough into the mental processes of Schippers and other impeachment supporters. He never displays any self-doubt, even now that impeachment has failed. We never know how he would answer the objections of the President's attorneys and others that we do not convict of crimes in America based on secret evidence.
Is the review positive or negative? 