Negative Positive
Title: A Case for Not Procreating
Review: Roszak is a nonfiction author by trade and "Flicker" reveals why Roszak should have stayed in the nonfiction game. It's main character is simultaneously dumb, lazy and passive. Presumably, Roszak makes him that way as an excuse to explain things to the reader, but in so doing he makes the reader feel dumb, lazy and passive. Just because Aronofsky is going to make a movie of the book doesn't mean the book is good. Hopefully Darren won't borrow anything from the book other than the high concept of movies being a tool with which to end the world.
Is the review positive or negative? 