Negative Positive
Title: Never felt so cheap as I did after the season finale
Review: The creator might argue that this series is a about developing interesting characters, that it's not just a series of cheap dramatic tricks with no payoff. She'd be wrong on both counts. She over-relies on misdirection and ambiguity in developing her charcaters, and in the end most of them seem contrived and two-dimensional. What's worse is she persuaded me to become emotionally invested in her central dramatic question, "Who killed Rosie Larsen?" Only to be told, "I'm not going to tell you, besides that's not what the show is about." Really? What rubbish! AMC cancels Rubicon and gives us this tripe. I will not be back for season 2. Who killed Rosie Larsen? I couldn't care less.
Is the review positive or negative? 