Negative Positive
Title: A hack does a hack job
Review: The book is filled with nothing but trash. How can a law professor not remember that the UN charter DOES allow self-defensive acts? How many times do you have to be struck by an enemy before you strike back, regardless of whether you have UN permiso or not? Fine, so the attack on Afghanistan was in retribution and violation of Geneva Conventions, but what was America to do? TALK the terrorists to death, rather than with bombs? If the professor really believes in law and justice, then why doesn't he beleive Saddam's and Milosevic's actions were grounds enough for going into Iraq and Kosovo? Also, if he could judge the actions of the Allies in WWI and WWII, would he hold THEM to the same standards and level of criticism?
Is the review positive or negative? 