Negative Positive
Title: Too Much Rhetoric
Review: I had to read this book for calculus, and it was hard for me to get through a chapter without cringing at Dunham's rhetoric that he is constantly using. In an academic writing (and in a mathematics book no less) I would like to see a lot more objectiveness. Dunham forms biases and writes accordingly; for example, he absolutely fawns over Euler yet can only mention a fraction of Newton's accomplishments. Please Professor Dunham - when writing about logic, write more logically!
Is the review positive or negative? 