Negative Positive
Title: would give zero stars
Review: What is baffling to me is how fans of the original Ender's Game can like this book. Bean takes credit for many moments when Ender showed his brilliance. What? While I could understand if this were revisionist history - a bitter old Bean trying to relive glory days - I dont believe that is the case here. In the end this (and the subsequent books of the shadow series) seems like an author trying to relive his glory days but in doing so he undercuts the amazing accomplishment that was Ender's Game. I will now completely ignore these shadow books so I can keep rereading the original with the same wonder that I had the first time...and the second...and the third...
Is the review positive or negative? 