Negative Positive
Title: Warning: Limited Scientific Value Here!
Review: I am an avid science book reader and have read quite a bit about research into Alzheimer's disease. [In my opinion] the extent of this author's research into Alzheimer's research basically seems to consist of attending one single meeting on the topic, interviewing a handful of people there, and presenting some limited views and notions on what might cause the disease. [I believe there was] no in-depth research into what's known about this this disease -- only a quick snapshot of some Alzheimer's research presented one week at a meeting a couple of years ago. The "science" that is presented is trivialized and presented in tabloid format. It is not nearly as useful as what one can find in an average newspaper article on this disease by many other adept journalists who have covered the field expertly for years.
Is the review positive or negative? 