Negative Positive
Title: There is one BIG mistake in this book...
Review: Actually, there are lots of big mistakes in this book, but the FIRST major mistake is the fact that it is classified as NONfiction. I mean, come on... Any book with a subtitle that includes the phrase "How Dubya Became a Great President" HAS to be fiction. Actually, now that I think about it some more, ten years ago if anyone had written a novel with a plotline about the idiot, alcoholic son of a failed president becoming president himself, the book would never have found a publisher. Absolutely unbelieveable, they would have said. Utter fantasy, and poorly conceived fantasy at that. Yet here we are. And now John Podhoretz, an alleged journalist from the New York Post (what? Were all the writers at the National Enquirer busy that weekend?), manipulates and twists the facts as quickly as a street mime making a balloon hat. But political fantasy is still fantasy. The only thing this book is missing is a hobbit or two...
Is the review positive or negative? 