Negative Positive
Title: A pathetic attempt to further a pathetic cause.
Review: This whole investigation, MILLIONS of Democrat and Republican taxpayer's dollars spent chasing the Republican's dream of revenge on Democrats for past occurences, has been a total waste of time. This book is evidence not of the wrongdoing, or moral corruption, of a president, but rather it is evidence of an overzealous man who was consumed by a hatred that is beyond what would be reasonable for an unbiased person. History will record Clinton as basically good, but flawed man. History will record Starr as biased, obsessed investigator who was intent on "getting his man" using any means possible, right or wrong. That is if history remembers Mister Starr at all.
Is the review positive or negative? 