Negative Positive
Title: Biased Opinion that Skirts the Facts
Review: Writing my term paper on Hirohito, I decided I wanted to have as many sources as possible to insure the validity of my work. Reading several books, I came to realise that although the supposed all-powerful leader of Japan, the military got out of Hirohito's power. A pacifist himself, he did not wish such war for Japan. Edward Behr would have us believe he was a conniving war-lord, hidden all this time by his 'image-makers'. There is one thing I'd like to see: what Behr, or any of us would have done in the same situation. A good book should give us a non-biased description of what happened, and help us to see what the situation was really like for those involved. It's frankly a waste of paper.
Is the review positive or negative? 