Negative Positive
Title: Not Tolkien, Heinlein or anything remotely literary
Review: To give the author the benefit of the doubt I read the whole book hoping that somewhere I would find some redeeming quality within it's pages. The characters are simplistic and one dimensional. I suppose Hari's (main character) FU mouth and attitude is supposed to be his endearing characteristic, but after awhile it becomes dumb, crass and boring. ... There is nothing subtle or artistic about his ability to describe a scene or situation. ... P>On the cover review they compare it to Lord of the Rings and other classic books and it has nothing in common with any of the good books that so many people love. It is blood, guts and gore with a liberal dose of profanity and some skewed anarchist philosophy thrown in...I give it one star because it made it into print without a lot of typos.
Is the review positive or negative? 