Negative Positive
Title: Typos drive stake through awkward premise and prose.
Review: If you are lured to what one would hope would reflect meaningfully on the foundation provided by Hillerman or Doss, steer clear of this typo-filled cluster-hug of poor plot construction, incredible character development (NOT in a good way), and dialogue only believable if the characters involved in the discourse are suffering some excruciating intestinal malfunction. Other than that, have a ball!
Is the review positive or negative? 