Negative Positive
Title: How Can Beckwith Argue for Genetic "Personhood?"
Review: I do not find simple possession of DNA to be an adequate argument for personhood myself, as this argument overlooks uses of genetic data to deny others personhood.Outside the context of stacked and constrained syllogisms and heuristics, empirical rebuttals mean that propositional content is invalid, which means that any conclusion falls apart if you do not accept the a priori basis for "reason" in this context.Flannagan and Beckwith are the ones who provide us with no basis for their argument that can be empirically corroborated.
Is the review positive or negative? 