Negative Positive
Title: In desperate need of a copy editor
Review: Much good information here. Cost of repair information is excellent, but lack of frequency of repair information limits the value of said information. Way too much copy-and-pasting, and therefore not enough new information on each year and model. Also, enough editing mistakes and self-contradictions to call the whole enterprise into question. Two examples : Performance data in the article contradicts performance data in the data tables in more than one place. The parts list for the 1996 model has a great big label "Parts List for 1975 911s." Jarring.The annual ratings are only somewhat useful, as they compare that year's Porsche with other contemporary cars, rather than comparing 911s of different years to one another. If I'm trying to pick between two generations of 911, the ratings are not comparable between them.Again, much useful information that needs to be better organized and better edited. I look forward to the next edition.
Is the review positive or negative? 