Negative Positive
Title: Pseudo-science at best
Review: I quite agree with the reviewer from East Hartford. Maybe I am not extremely eligible to comment on the portions dealing with Escher and Bach, respectively (I have no appetite for Escher. I like chamber music of Bach and somtimes play his keyboard music but my performance level is, of course, that of amateur.)But I must say the part dealing with Gödel's Theorem of Incompleteness is *complete garbage*. I am convinced anyone with a degree of mathematics will agree with me: for those who have no background in mathematics, I assure you that Gödel's theorem concerns a problem in "formal logic" and has nothing to do with human-cogno-something.If this book were meant to be a cult literature, that would be okay: I don't care anyway.But if this is meant to be an entertainment for people with no scientific background, I rate this alchemy or pseudo-science at best.
Is the review positive or negative? 