Negative Positive
Title: A kid's newfound excitement
Review: Mr. Bart's excitement in finding something which had been known to the world for thousands of years is amusing. But he saw it for himself fought to let other people know that he knows it, but that doesnot make him a seer of truth nor the Columbus of new ideas. The worst thing I found in this book is he tried to prove something right at the cost of proving something wrong. In the process he showed his immaturity of thoughts and he cannibalized what he tried to show the world, the peaceful coexistence of ideas in a middle-path. He fought a crusade of the east vs. the west, "logical" science vs. fuzzy science completely ruling out the emergence of a synergical consciousness. I disliked the book and donot think I would jump to read his other publications. He has a lot more to learn to sound convincing and needs to change his attitude towards knowledge.
Is the review positive or negative? 