Negative Positive
Title: Misleading Advertising
Review: The description for this disc doesn't mention that it's the antique 1917 edition of the JPS Tanakh, which is the King James version with a little tweaking to fix up verse numbering differences and the odd word or two. One can only conclude that the publisher's aim was to gull the public into thinking that it's the current JPS translation, especially when they list a recent publication date and include a current "review" telling us what a great translation it is. This version of the text is in the public domain and can be easily found online, in both Hebrew and the 1917 JPS translation. Don't waste your money.
Is the review positive or negative? 