Negative Positive
Title: Ridiculous pomo nonsense.
Review: I'm sure that there might be plenty who say that I'm too dull and logocentric, too "Oedipalized", to recognize the obvious profundity that lies in these pages. The intelligent reader, however, who does not confuse obscurity for insight, might think differently.I don't know what would possess someone to write about the "postmodern animal" - I really don't. So often in these pages it seems as though Baker has to read "the postmodern animal" into places it just doesn't seem to be. That is, whatever the hell the "postmodern animal" is. I'm not quite sure myself after trying to decipher this trendy gobbledegook.I guess I have to "supply my own meaning" or some other such hippy postmodernist platitude.What is happening to this world?
Is the review positive or negative? 