Negative Positive
Title: Not credible
Review: The O'Brien's Atlas would seem superior, if not for the disqualifying incompetence of rendering Poland reformed & not Catholic; it cannot be trusted. The Hammond Atlas is a reprint of The Times one. The simplistic Atlas of World History by John Haywood comprises 6 parts with a 4-page introduction & 28 double-spread maps each (180 spreads/360 pages in total) in addition to acknowledgments & index. After the original publishing in 1997 by Sharpe, as a 3-volume set (ISBN: 1563248549), it was reprinted not only in full in 1 volume by Weidenfeld in the Cassell's series (ISBN: 030435757X) on 384 pages available to be seen inside at Amazon UK, but also abbreviated in 1 shorter volume with only 121 double-page spreads in color by Barnes & Noble (ISBN: 0760706875) & MetroBooks (ISBN: 1586630997), as well as in full in separate 1-/2-part volumes (some with encyclopedic dictionary spreads).
Is the review positive or negative? 