Negative Positive
Title: Bounded Rationality Impresses No-One
Review: As a male medical student, I contend that Beckwith's work is factually incorrect. I'm sure that his self-referential Aristotlean and bounded logic convinces anti-abortionists and the naive undecided who are unfamiliar with anti-abortionist a priori premises and manipulation of the debate, but it does not impress rigorously critical sources of opinion. Beckwith's argument is bounded rationality and logic, and is not proper rigorous Socratic dialogue
Is the review positive or negative? 