Negative Positive
Title: Another sensationalist publication
Review: What happened to academic credibility? What happened to logical, reasoned arguments? I read this book in England, hoping to gain insight into Bush's flaws, but all it did was make me sick with American writing. Academic writing NEVER makes so many outlandish, unevidenced claims...magazines and hollow, risky books do and therefore I classify this book with the National Star--interesting, yet unbelievable.
Is the review positive or negative? 