Negative Positive
Title: Bunk, bunk, bunk
Review: A long time science reader, I'm dismayed books like 5/5/2000 are filed anywhere but the New Age section. I had occasion to read 5/5/200; I was neither enlightened nor entertained. Writing throughout is spotty, with much of use of the worst kind of science and poor reasoning.I wonder at the number of anonymous five-star reviews for 5/5/2000. Don't buy 5/5/2000 -- for a better read, try Carl Sagan's "Demon Haunted World" or anything by a more respected authority willing to find wonder in the world, rather than in hokum.
Is the review positive or negative? 