Negative Positive
Title: Dreadful!
Review: I bought this book because it was written by Leon Uris. What a mistake! The book is dreadful! It is poorly written, poorly edited, and seems to be a parody of a novel. Did he write it tongue in cheak? It is choppy and poorly organized; the pacing is uneven at best. It seems like a decent outline for a good story that is poorly executed. How do "they" let work like this get published? It seems that "they" are just cashing in on Uris's good name. But how about the unsuspecting reader who puts out cash expecting a good read? It's not fair to the reader or to the reputation of one who has written some great books to put out such a weak excuse for a novel.
Is the review positive or negative? 