Negative Positive
Title: Misinformation abounds...
Review: Bork writes on page 104 that "Vriend is worth a closer look." He should follow his own advice because he misstates the legal issue surrounding the case. Not surprising that this radical avoided solid research. I advise readers to access primary sources instead of swallowing second-hand interpretations. Too much work? Well, that plays well into any idealogue's hand, doesn't it?!
Is the review positive or negative? 