Negative Positive
Title: More politically correct, multicultural group-think...
Review: It's amazing that a book so biased, and based on multicultural group-think name-calling, can be taken seriously at all. From the comfort of a tenured chair (how terribly "oppressed" the author is), the author dribbles out subjective drivel that aims to build the self esteem of his own group-think coterie--not to encourage rational, objective scholarship. The "we are good, you are evil" theme is getting very boring and tiresome for many people. Get over it.
Is the review positive or negative? 