Negative Positive
Title: Bouncing Across the Pond
Review: Hart's book was exceptionaly weak in content, spending the majority of the time on justification of methodology. Whenever one thought that an opportunity presented itself to deal with GREECE and GENDER, immediately the reader was bounced across the Atlantic to issues of African American radicalism or culture in the United States. This could have been a great book, if it were 120 pages that actaully dealt with Greece and utilized primary sources as opposed to secondary theoretical sources. Conjecture is not history.
Is the review positive or negative? 