Negative Positive
Title: Yes, it's possible for John Cusack to make a bad movie
Review: I was flipping through the channels some time ago and came across this movie, which I had misfortune of paying for when it was in theaters. To say it was a waste of fine acting talent is certainly true, but doesn't capture awfulness and pointlessness of the film.The film was awful because the writing was awful, and great actors (although slightly miscast) and good directing could not make up for something that just wasn't there.Console yourself in watching classics for the actors in these movies instead: for Cusack, watch "The Sure Thing"; for Roberts, "Notting Hill"; for Walken, "The King of New York"; for Zeta-Jones, "Traffic" and for Crystal, "When Harry Met Sally." Now *those* are some movies worth watching.
Is the review positive or negative? 