Negative Positive
Title: Very unconvincing
Review: After watching this I became less convinced that bigfoot might exist. There was no "hard" evidence gained and the researchers were looking for clues that supported their theory, which is the absolute wrong way to approach any investigation.The credibility of Mr. Biscardi is questionable in my mind when he referred to the known bigfoot hoaxer Ivan Marx as "my partner". He also showed several photos that were obviously hoaxed, including Marx's crippled "Bigfoot" and an absurd-looking rubber and hair costume supposedly chewing on a deer's leg.Also ridiculous was the alleged photo from Clarence, NY, which showed a person in an a bad gorilla suit beside a John Deere Gator.But the clincher for me was when Biscardi was "wood-knocking" on a tree at night and then when the echo came back said "he just responded!".Overall a very disappointing, uninspired and unconvincing effort.
Is the review positive or negative? 