Negative Positive
Title: A waste of good trees
Review: The old addage; "consider the source..." has never been truer. It rankles me, a chiropractor, to see this trash in print. Especially from this author. Since he published his own work, I suppose we could also blame the publisher for an amazing lack of editorial judgment. Rondberg has been convicted of election campaign fraud. He's also a known adulterer, has committed perjury, and is a known scam artist. Amongst his chiropractic "brethren" he has become a joke. The outrageous behavior of this classic narcissist would actually MAKE an excellent book, though non-fiction this odious would likely not be believed by most readers. I would not believe the opinion of this very flawed human being if he told me the sun were shining at mid-day. As to issues raised in the book, they are unoriginal, uninteresting, and explained at a 1st grade level. Which, coincidentally, is the intelligence level of the author.
Is the review positive or negative? 