Negative Positive
Title: Symbols for the symbol-minded
Review: Simplistic anecdotes that condescend to the reader. Friedman fails to live up to his own conceptual assertions, time and time again. A waste of time, and dangerous because Friedman writes in a way that people FEEL like he's distilled the issues in a way that's utterly understandable; instead, he's left out 80% of any given issue. I've given this guy shot after shot to say something important and meangingful. That's all over now.
Is the review positive or negative? 