Negative Positive
Title: one other bit of info on the lead debate
Review: What hasn't been stated here is that the batch tested by Consumer Labs that was found to contain lead and the batches tested by the other independent labs were DIFFERENT batches. Consumer Labs had an expiration date of 2005, while the other labs' batches had an expiration date of 2006. Thus, it is totally accurate for both sides to make their claims/statements. However, lead is too dangerous an item for developing brains and bodies (and for adults, too) to take chances.If Gummy Vites had stepped up to the plate and stated that they did have a batch which had problems and that they had undertaken the strictest standards to make sure it would never happen again, then I would feel much more comfortable. But they totally denied the charges and never acknowledged that they tested different batches than the ones that were found to be "defective". To me that is a big lack of integrity.
Is the review positive or negative? 