Negative Positive
Title: Interesting but unsupported theory of freemasonry's origin.
Review: Author starts with a few interesting coincidences, presentsalot of circular reasoning, and asserts that freemasonsoriginated as English Knights Templar who went undergroundafter the order's suppression in early 14th century.Earliest documented evidence of freemasonry dates from mid16th century, and author fails to fill in the gap andjustify his assertion. As a sideline, author gives defenseof freemasonry from charges it is antichristian andconspiratorial.
Is the review positive or negative? 