Negative Positive
Title: The title was apt
Review: It's unfortunate that some people see part of a title and not the full title of a book. I thought this was a great book. It was interesting reading. I started it out with initial doubts, next thing I know I'm halfway through the book. Once I started reading, I realized he was trying to answer three questions: 1) want current events affected the historian's point of view towards his research, 2) how was the historian influenced by his peers 3) what goals did the historian hope to reach during his life. It was obvious that current events influence all of us, as much as our peers do. But what constitutes a good or a bad historian? These are the questions that he answer, from his perspective.
Is the review positive or negative? 