Negative Positive
Title: Woodward could make anything dull, and does
Review: We can see where Woodward's interests lie, since Clinton takes up more pages by himself than the rest put together. This should be an interesting, readable book, but nothing will be make Woodward's style tolerable. He is duller than ever, and the book is a chore. He needs a ghost, but quick. A good case is made for the special prosecutor's office as running amok, but no one comes off well, which is the case with too much scrutiny. The legacy of Watergate? We know entirely too much about politicians.
Is the review positive or negative? 