Negative Positive
Title: very convincing
Review: The author does an excellent job at interviewing all the witnesses of bigfoot. He is very careful to re-check anybody's story. The book is filled with so many details it can take a while to read. The only criticism I would have is I don't think he is a very interesting writer. When ever he starts to become reflective about his life or tries to make an analogy or metaphor, he isen't a very literary writer. But since his intention is to be an investigative journalist, his weaknesses as a writer dosen't matter as much. The investigative interviews are what make the book worth reading.
Is the review positive or negative? 