Negative Positive
Title: Too much irrelevant information
Review: While this book is good at raising the question of how we might better use critical thinking to make better decisions, the author tries to cover too many other issues as a way to justify his position. Tearing down the book 'Blink', straying into greenhouse warming, and reiterating how poorly policitians deal with issues does little to further the case for the need for critical thinking. I wish he had concentrated on how to integrate our critical thinking and intuitive thinking brains. As it is, he comes across as just another radical looking only for data that supports his premise while conveniently ignoring other data from legitimate sources.
Is the review positive or negative? 