Negative Positive
Title: Surface reporting - at best
Review: Sebastian Jungar really sold me on a Perfect Storm due to his in-depth and remarkably interesting reporting, therefore I eagerly read Fire. His previously demonstrated ability to move out of the way and let the stories tell themselves is completely lacking in fire. For such a talented writer this book left me very disapointed, but more it left me feeling used and abused by a misleading title (the content is much more than "Fire") and worse by the way the chapters flow together like short, disjointed articles, rather than building towards a central theme. The books seems distressingly like an atempt to showcase Mr Jungar rather than a writer interacting with the reader on subjects of real interest. Proof that the most interesting subjects can be ruined.
Is the review positive or negative? 