Negative Positive
Title: False Advertising
Review: This describes itself as "How the Science of Child Development Explains What Makes Us Human" and there are a few cute little anecdotes about child development. But these are interspersed among long rambling philosophical discussions about what art critics and artists think is art and what philosophers, rabbis and the bible think is morality. It is like a little, anecdotal scientific information filled out with whatever else he can think of that is vaguely related. Read Stephen Pinker or Robert Wright instead.
Is the review positive or negative? 