Negative Positive
Title: It could have been a great thriller &#65533;&#65533;.
Review: But the story has been developed too poorly (at least for Follet's standard).The idea is great, even if the "schizophrenic" protagonist reminds me Bourne, a Ludlum's character.There are too many coincidencies .... For example, I think that is quite impossible that a group of fellow students are, many years later, all involved in such an intrigue, with all these different rulesA plot like this needs more pages and more details to be told, and, I know, the author is able to..... I'm thinking for example to "The pillars of the earth", but this time he didn't...This novel has been a great disappointment, expecially because I'm a Follet fan.... I've read almost all its books and this is, no doubt, one of the worsts.
Is the review positive or negative? 