Negative Positive
Title: A little knowledge is a dangerous thing
Review: Maduro's book is a typical example of an "environmental backlash" diatribe. He presents numerous examples of what he interprets to be flaws in the ozone depletion theory, yet despite the fact that the book goes on for 356 pages, Maduro cannot refute these simple indisputable facts which connect CFCs to ozone depletion:1) Most chlorine in the stratosphere is of man-made origin (CFCs).2) Chlorine becomes reactive towards ozone at low temperatures in the presence of polar stratospheric clouds which occur only over Antarctica in the wintertime. Contrary to Maduro's evidence, it is well established that ozone depletion has only been observed in the time since CFCs achieved high concentrations in the atmosphere (1970s to present).Therefore, simple logic dictates that man-made CFCs cause ozone depletion.
Is the review positive or negative? 