Negative Positive
Title: Further confusing the confused
Review: I may be the only one dissenting on this tome, but I found this book to be not only boringly repetitive (as other reviewers did) and primary-school-basic (as others did), but also quite confusing. By using an endless variety of examples unrelated to photography in attempts to illustrate his points, he takes readers on useless and distracting excursions and manages to fill almost 300 pages to treat a subject which is perfectly treatable in 25-30 pages. Read Ansel Adams "The Negative" and other authors instead, or just consult your own camera or meter manual. You'll learn more in a shorter time than with Mr. Farzad's rambling and dull book.
Is the review positive or negative? 