Negative Positive
Title: Fantasy at its Best
Review: I find it ironic that the word "apologetics" is used for this type of defense of supernaturalism (apologies for irrational thinking are surely needed!). I agree with the "ad absurdum" reader below that this book is just one more in a series trying hard to defend a failing supernatural belief system. There is nothing new in this book and certainly no arguments that have not been made before. I have read C.S. Lewis and Behes books. They both make the assumption that a supernatural being exists and then go on from there. As the reviewer below, I think 300 years of modern science has shown the total baselessness of supernaturalism. The bottom line is that there is no evidence that such a domain or being exists. Christian apologists can say what they want, but convoluted logic and words from god do not count as evidence.
Is the review positive or negative? 