Negative Positive
Title: Only for aggressive actors
Review: I am always interested in art criticism and art promotion...these are rarely compatable. This book seems to be another promotion for someone who has so many fingers in so many "professions" that he can hardly call himself a full-time artist (whatever that means). I don't know if his art is any good or not; I've never seen it. But I do know that each artist makes their choice about how to run their life. I know lots of artists whose art has more energy, cognative depth and artistic merit than many of the so-called great artists who equate marketing with substance. Though there are some aspects of this book worth ruminating about, a better tale could have been told - that might be of help to other artists - if Rudd kept his ego out of this book....or is ego the name of his game?
Is the review positive or negative? 