Negative Positive
Title: LARGELY DISAPPOINTING READING
Review: The book brings very little new information about one of the best known Soviet general. It lacks archival research and impartiality in evaluating interview materials on which it largely based.Also, criticism of an excellent Anthony Beevor's book "The Fall of Berlin 1945" is unjustified. Indeed, Beevor's book is what Axell's is not: a well researched historical study.
Is the review positive or negative? 