Negative Positive
Title: Unatural nature.
Review: I am greatly pleased by Verillo's comments. I read Roazen 30 years ago and was pleased by the heretical stuff (Eichorn/Mahler). The revelation about Freud's personality rings true. (I'm reading about LBJ now.) The really surprising thing about it that these are not freaks. Such people are not common and they are not met with by many. That is perhaps because they associate with those who serve their ends and they are mostly those who are under their spell. But they are not rare. I believe that if history were examined with the purpose of identifying such people and following the course of their lives much would be learned about the dynamics of human events. It is perhaps misleading to use the word conspiracy but it goes logically with the word cult. That would make Freud a great conspirator. It is not politically correct to give such people a great amount of credit for influencing the course of history. But they do.
Is the review positive or negative? 