Negative Positive
Title: Light shed on an old controversy
Review: I'm amazed that anyone who claims to have read the book can still really blame the controversy on budget-problems and keep a straight face. Ellison did more than produce an angry intro to the book; he produces fact after fact to combat the lies that have been told about him for decades. This is both compelling and sickening at the same time... very engaging reading. The scripts themselves were interesting, although it was difficult for me to read essentially the same script over and over. People interested in how scripts change over time will enjoy this, but I think you have to be in the right frame of mind to read multiple drafts of the same work. Don't read this book if you refuse to believe Gene Roddenberry had human failings and ambitions.
Is the review positive or negative? 