Negative Positive
Title: Strong in history and language, but weak in mathematics and science
Review: The authors clearly feel more comfortable with teaching language and history than they do with teaching mathematics and science. This significant imbalance is reflected both in the relative number of pages devoted to each of these subjects, and especially in the quality and quantity/depth of the suggested resources.While the book remains a valuable resource, a follow-up edition would benefit greatly from a thorough revision and expansion of the sections covering mathematics and the pure sciences (the coverage of physics is particularly weak, while the coverage of computer science/programming is absolutely abysmal). I feel that such a revision is quite necessary for the book to achieve its full potential, even if this requires the services of an additional co-author with a much stronger scientific background.
Is the review positive or negative? 