Negative Positive
Title: T. Friedman is not what he used to be, or never was.
Review: It s possible to fool all the people all the time. Thomas L. Friedman has proved it. While once he studied relatively small issues in depth, and his poor writing was not as obvious, now he studies the whole wide world. Without depth. With analogies that shift and make little sense. With a tin ear for language and with such energy for such wrong headed or slight notions as to be astounding to this reader. I got through one half of the book and wrote my own review in a local paper. Shame on you all for feeding this man's egomania.
Is the review positive or negative? 