Negative Positive
Title: Counter Argument
Review: I too read Professor Shapo in law school, and I fundamentally disagree with the earlier review of this book. Didn't Professor Shapo teach that the law is an evolving creature; if so, it looks like the law in this case stopped evolving around 1975....while a huge fan of A Nation of Guinea Pigs (I have read it twice), I found A Duty to Act to be lacking in how it addresses fundamental changes to tort law in the last twenty-five years...I may not have written 23 law review articles since I graduated, but I did go to school in the state of Minnesota!
Is the review positive or negative? 