Negative Positive
Title: All hype, no content
Review: It was a good thing I didn't pay for my own copy. I would have felt a fool. This book fails to deliver any substance of the nature or causes of the compromises and/or non-compromises made by the Justices. The only thing this book does well is the one thing that it should not do, and that is to reveal the confidences to which the author was privy. The author seems to have forgotten that he received the confidences in his capacity as a lawyer. It is just as well that the author is now a prosecutor. No private corporation or individual would want to hire a lawyer who divulges information communicated in confidence.
Is the review positive or negative? 