Negative Positive
Title: Fascinating nonsense.
Review: The book is the most fascinating example I know of the pretentious pseudo-scientist "investigator" who takes natural experience and "accounts for them" with the most-far fetched theories. Ships and airplane have accidents the world over but to Berlitz ordinary common-sense explanations are not good enough. So he "accounts" for these losses by speculating about visitible and invisible UFOs, sea monsters, holes in the sky leading into "the third dimension", and a whole lot of such absurd speculations.
Is the review positive or negative? 