Negative Positive
Title: A poor work, full of anti-Western Civilization propaganda.
Review: Michael Woods appears to be a self-loathing European, who takes delight in disparaging his own cultural roots. In this video he uses legend, tall-tales, gossip and folklore to do it.As others have pointed out, "In the Footsteps of Alexander the Great" contains some major historical inaccuracies, and some major "heterophobic" flapdoodle.In his roll as propagandist-in-chief, Michael Woods seems never to have met a non-Westerner he didn't like; nor is he able to find much about Alexander to his liking -- except for the talk of Alex's male companion.This is a "feminine" production. It is almost as though Mr. Woods is showing the audience his sorrow for having been born with a penis.Those interested in the more manly, miliatry aspects of the General, his conquests, and his army should look elsewhere.
Is the review positive or negative? 