Negative Positive
Title: Sneaky attempt to discredit genuine science!
Review: Embryology is seemingly never tackled in this book. Apparently, author Hunter feels he cannot whip up a doubletalking creationist excuse for why embryos (even those of humans) look quite a bit alike. The book tries a new strategy against evolution. Several.The archaopteryx is not mentioned. Neither is homo erecus or Nebraska Man or Neaderthals. Just lots of confusing double talk. Look all---- we have dna to shw all lifeforms of humans, apes, and other vertebrates are related. Skip doubleatalking crap like this!
Is the review positive or negative? 