Negative Positive
Title: Not worth the money
Review: This book is a compilation of articles that are extremely disappointing and unhistorical. There are many psychoanalytical articles on Adolf Hitler, which is a method of study that most traditional historians reject as quackery. There are articles that use discredited facts in order to "prove" that Hitler was some kind of inhumane monster. The editor even writes in the introduction that he is taking a look at Nazism with an "elementary morality." It is quite disturbing to see how many historians actually feel morally obligated to condemn Hitler instead of using fact to illustrate his thoughts and actions. This book would be better suited for a class on ethics, but it is certainly not history.
Is the review positive or negative? 