Negative Positive
Title: Ann's research isn't research.
Review: Ann has bragged many times about her huge number of "footnotes" (by which she means endnotes.) But if you actually looked at how Ann comes up with some of her facts instead of allowing her to spoon-feed her ideas to you, you could see her intentional deceit. When trying to claim that there were only X number of articles on some news story, she uses LexisNexis searches to justify her claim. Fair, right? Wrong! Let's say she wants to search for Bush's state of the union speech. If she wants to show some point about how "the liberal media" did not cover the event enough, instead of searching for "Bush" and "State of the Union," she might search for "Bush" and "State of the Union address" and "war on terrorism" and "economy" and "any other word that will limit the number of results." Don't let her get away with such treachery.
Is the review positive or negative? 