Negative Positive
Title: Better titled: "A Believer's Search for God"
Review: I must agree with the reviwers (iconoclast 666 particularly) that this book contains many scientific inaccuracies, omissions, and selectivly slanted misrepresentations of current scientific knowledge. Not to mention that a vast majority of the "scientific ideas" are really "straw man" arguments that are so watered down (or just plain misrepresented) that they become easy targets to those predisposed to attack them. I can only imagine this book would be persuasive to someone without a background in biological science. Do youself a favor and skip this one. A much better and more thoughtful read can be found elsewhere (I would suggest Richard Dawkins or Carl Sagan of course, but Gary Marcus's new book The Birth of the Mind is also spectacular not only in its new ideas, but in its summary of current biological science---something the "Search for God" sorely needs).
Is the review positive or negative? 