Negative Positive
Title: Corrections please
Review: The obvious errors in key data on Stanford undermine this book's credibility. What other errors are also in the book?I have been requesting from Princeton Review/Random House a full listing of corrections, but they are silent.It's too bad, because this was becoming my favorite guidebook. The rankings are engaging, and I particularly like the underlying message: selectivity is not the same as quality. Some great schools are not super-selective; and some super-selective schools may not provide a top education to undergrads.
Is the review positive or negative? 