Negative Positive
Title: Kinda reaches a bit for proof
Review: The book, as much as I would like to say otherwise, does reach conclusions that are not supported well by pertinent facts. For example, the claim the govt knew about Sept 11th before it happened. Why? Because for years people said "something was going to happen somewhere". Hence the gov't knew on Sept 11th there would be planes crashign into building. But by using 10 year old speeches to prove the gov't knew something was going to happen is a stretch.Similar conclusions in the book exist, and it detracts from the possible truth that is in the chapters.
Is the review positive or negative? 