Negative Positive
Title: Wish I read the reviews first
Review: Of course the author would emphasize different things than a standard history but his biases are evident. Kennedy assasination conspiracy theories! Come on, these were put to rest years ago. He does allow that there was strong evidence against Alger Hiss- now of course we have definitive proof from Russia. Although there is material of value in the book, I am afraid that if this was your primary exposure to US History you still wouldn't know much
Is the review positive or negative? 