Negative Positive
Title: Logical Argument
Review: A very convincing, logical argument against creationism and divine intervention. I'm a big fan of Dawkins and I've yet to read one of his books that I haven't liked. The first chapter of this book addresses the tired contention that the human eye is too complex to have evolved slowly over time. Creationists argue that the eye has too many interdependent parts for each of the parts to have evolved seperately and still have the eye "work" to any degree. They say that something less than a fully developed eye would not function at all and would be detrimental to the evolution of the species. Dawkins attacks this argument head on and wins with logic, reasoning and the observable facts in the historical record.
Is the review positive or negative? 