Negative Positive
Title: Terrible Editing, has mistakes, still useful
Review: I learned some stuff from this book so I don't regret checking it out from our library.But the editing is just terrible for a book going out to print. Undergrad project reports are better structured than this book. Lots of typos, editing issues, blocks of white pages, etc. -> NonprofessionalAlso at least once I noticed a deep conceptual mistake. (Working in risk neutral measure, and using mu, the risky return of a stock? That's unforgivable!)
Is the review positive or negative? 