Negative Positive
Title: Another Ripper Theory
Review: This book, although quire interesting as a "who was Jack" theory, just did not ring true. The diary itself allegedly written by James Maybrick is the problem, it just does not seem plausible. The author spent an awful lot of time making things fit to the diary rather than the other way around and it just did not convince me. Also taking into account that the owner of the diary was an aspiring and unsucessful writer and that he did not explain satisfactorily how he came to find it, I find this theory a bit hard to swallow. Entertaining though if you are interested in Jack the Ripper.
Is the review positive or negative? 