Negative Positive
Title: somewhat mistitled maybe?
Review: I will begin by saying this is a good intro to druidism. It is authored by a high ranking member of ADF, one of America's largest druid groups. It has some really good information. My downsids of why this was brought from five stars are:The last almost third of the book is about groups, which would be fine, if the title was different, in my opinion. Personally, I also wonder if a "druid" alone would be a "druid" or if they would simply be another title such as bard, ovate, seer, or along those lines following on the same path. This is not an insult, it is just to me a druid is a result of many years of long term study and practice, and they also historically are also qualified to teach. Otherwise, this book has good foundational practice, and seems to have good historical research.
Is the review positive or negative? 