Negative Positive
Title: Really Needs Links For Footnotes
Review: I totally agree with D. Arnold, the footnotes being in line are very troublesome in reading and thinking through the statements being addressed. I have completed the introductory material and about to begin the "Discipleship" itself.I am looking forward to the reading, but would greatly appreciate and up date on the footnotes location and the possibility of an active link from to the footnote itself to the footnote material. The link to a footnote, and the footnote itself should not interrupt the actual reading of the text.You need to be able to go from the footnote to the text of the footnote and return to the location of the link in the book. Other than this very akward reading of footnotes I'd rate this book thus far a "five star". However, because of the awkarwness of the footnotes and the lack of needed links I'm rating it with "two stars". I paid a "lot" less for much better structured (links) books.
Is the review positive or negative? 