Negative Positive
Title: No meaning or morals from philosophers of science, please.
Review: Dr. Stenger stands in a long line of scientists who hold that any opinion or belief held outside of scientism is irrational and without merit. In his attacks on other scientists and philosophers of science he could be called the Richard Dawkins of physics. He has a noticeable and intense disdain for the likes of physicists Penrose (who speaks of the Platonic realm) and Davies (who dares speak of God, if even as a metaphor); such "mystics" seem to have no place in true science, since they speak of "purpose." It would seem, according to Stenger, that such ill conceived notions stem from a misinterpreation of quantum facts, and that the existing laws of science are entirely sufficient in explaining the universe (those anomolies that science can't reckon with are either misunderstood or nonexistent). I guess we don't need a full theory of quantum mechanics and experiments on non-locality should stop.
Is the review positive or negative? 