Negative Positive
Title: Read the book before you write a review
Review: My line of reasoning is quite simple,this 1.200 page book appeared on May 14th 2002. No one (except for those in Wolfram's inner circle) has had the time yet to read (let alone absorve) the meaning or implications of this book.Yet there are already quite a number of reviews pontificating on the validity (or else) of his theories. I suggest reviewers stop trying to be the first to publish a review and have the honesty to try to understand first a work that took 10 years to write, before they comment.Amazon should also provide for the eventuality and not force readers to choose between 1-5 stars (i.e. by providing another option such as ???)
Is the review positive or negative? 