Negative Positive
Title: Her sources dispute her work!
Review: .If conservatives truly look to someone like Ann Coulter to be a leader in espousing their positions, then conservatism is worse off than I thought it was.For those who actually think that Ann Coulter's book Treason is a factual accounting of the McCarthy era, think again. One of the main sources that Ann footnotes is Ron Radosh. He is considered one of the most reputable scholars who have studied the McCarthy era in great detail.He is apparently appalled. This is what he had to say about Treason:"I am furious and upset about her book. I am reading it - she uses my stuff, Harvey Klehr and John Hayes, Allen Weinstein etc. to distort what we actually say and to make ludicrous and historically incorrect arguments..."Rather humiliating, wouldn't you say?.
Is the review positive or negative? 