Negative Positive
Title: Questions Answered
Review: Arguments against the historicity of the Genesis Flood generally take two tracks; the first is the positive evidence of historical geology, and the second is the negative arguments against the possibility of the event as presented in the Bible. John Woodmorrape has done an excellent job of dissecting and refuting the latter. The most common reasons given why the biblical account is wrong (size of the ark, number of animals, taking care of animals, etc.) will have to be rethought or abandoned. A very thought provoking book.
Is the review positive or negative? 