Negative Positive
Title: The Detroit Almanac
Review: A reliable reference book should be rigorously edited, and this one wasn't. Its typography is sloppy, with odd paragraph breaks, and it has misspelled words ("ediface" for "edifice" is one). Nicknames replace real ones. One photo shows up twice with two different captions; another, of the '60s band MC5, is backwards. And this is the second edition. However, if you're still going to spend.... for it, be sure your copy has the blush-red triangle in the corner that says "Includes Index!" The first edition apparently forgot it. Nine people claim to have copy-edited this book. They should deny it.
Is the review positive or negative? 