Negative Positive
Title: Scientific truth is the answer.
Review: The argument is about what is the best way to help patients. The answer has to be objective and data-driven. One has to learn science before claim something non-science or pserdo-science. I believe this book is worthless besides good language articlation. But we are talking about scientific truth, not poetic beautifulness, aren't we?
Is the review positive or negative? 