Negative Positive
Title: Not an Atheist...
Review: No true scientist can claim to be an Atheist. They simply don't have the information to make such a claim. A scientist must be agnostic. In this book, Dawkins is no Atheist, he is agnostic. He does show us how it is possible for life to have appeared with no outside intervention or planning. The entire book would be mere conjecture (as is every book on the otherside of this arguement) it weren't for the fact the artificial genetics work exactly as Dawkins describes. Those that argue that evolution can't work, are simply ignorant of current science (with emphasis on the intentionality implied by the root of ignorant - ignore).
Is the review positive or negative? 