Negative Positive
Title: No depth beneath all the mud
Review: What purports to be a serious journalistic exercise is really an artwork of mud-wracking. If you're looking for juicy gossip, its here. But most of the charges are silly and unsubstantiated. Somebody says Bill Clinton has a sexual disease because he claims to have seen his medical records. Who is this person? How would he get his medical records? Is there anybody who can back this up? Spare me.
Is the review positive or negative? 