Negative Positive
Title: Not to be trusted.
Review: This book made me angry from the second I saw the mislabeled photograph of John holding a child in Central Park. After reading other reviewers -- people who have already read their copy of the book -- I see that my suspicions were correct. The book is full of errors. That is NOT okay. At the price being charged for this highly touted book -- and after all this time -- there is no excuse for passing on errors and getting information wrong. The Beatles have long time fans that know lies when they hear or read them to a degree, but that's not the point -- look at the disservice done to younger, newer fans who are looking for a true history of The Beatles. It's not right to pass on this kind of crap. I no longer have any interest in reading this book. What's the point? This writer simply didn't do his homework.
Is the review positive or negative? 