Negative Positive
Title: Footnotes or endnotes?
Review: Supporters of Ann Coulter are crowing about the "fact" that all of her "facts" are extensively footnoted. One reviewer here even challenges us to refute just one footnote. Well, refuting them all would be much easier than refuting just one because there are so many to choose from. First of all, if you were dumb enough like me to spend money on anything by Ann Couter, then you might have realized that her "footnotes" are actually more like "endnotes" and often don't match the source. There is very little history in this book, as one reviewer has claimed, and far too much hatred. Ann Coulter is a believer and she reports the "facts" that support her beliefs. Diatribe does not even begin to describe this [fluff].
Is the review positive or negative? 