Negative Positive
Title: Errant tome critiquing "Mormonism"
Review: This book contains too many fallacoius arguments to be taken seriously. One such example would be his questioning of the Book of Mormon containing the fullness of the gospel, notwithstanding it not containing all aspects of Mormon theology (e.g., apotheosis). Notwithstanding, such is a non sequitur. The Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and other scriptures define it as Christ coming into this world, his ministry, his atonement, and resurrection (e.g., 3 nephi 27:13-21). As the Book of Mormon contains the most lucid explanations of the atonement (see, especially 2 Nephi 2, 9; Mosiah 15; Alma 34, 42), it therefore clearly qualifies as containing the fullness of the gospel, the protestations of critics notwithstanding.In addition, many aspects of Latter-day Saint theology IS contained in the Book of Mormon, such as pre-moral existance (Alma 13) and theosis (AKA deificatoin, apothesosis, divinisaton) (see 3 Nephi 28).I welcome questions and feedback at [...]
Is the review positive or negative? 