Negative Positive
Title: Excellent
Review: This is an excellent challange to many of the assumptions and doctrines of calvinistic-evangelical theology. The authors write clearly and are generally very fair in presenting their opponents' views (cf. William Abraham's essay on Assurance as a good example). Although the authors challenge many theological sacred cows, they write from the perspective of a sound and vibrant evangelical faith. One criticism I have is that it does not consider the perspectives of Karl Barth on election and how they challenge the Arminian worldview while avoiding the errors of Calvinism. Of course, Karl Barth's doctrine is not the book's target here.
Is the review positive or negative? 