Negative Positive
Title: I thought Bugliosi was smarter than this
Review: There is not really anything I can add within the confines of an Amazon review that has not already been covered in other reviews I read. I would love to go to trial against Mr. Bugliosi with the evidence, but I don't think he would risk it, knowing that the evidence argues so strongly against his conclusions. It is one thing for him to write a book which he will only have to defend in interviews where the interviewer's understanding of the evidence is extremely weak, it would be an entirely different experience for him to try his case in front of a judge or jury. Clearly, this book is not an attempt to look at the evidence objectively, and many of the author's conclusions are based on "straw man" arguments and superficial analysis.
Is the review positive or negative? 