Negative Positive
Title: Why did he re-write it and call it Climbing Mount Improbable?
Review: I read this and some of his more recent books. His more recent books are excellent: very well written, entertaining, and cogent.Watchmaker is my least favorite Dawkins book [so far]. In a few places, it is sloppy and unconvincing, although the thesis is right on the mark and almost speaks for itself to anyone with an appropriate technical background.I haven't read Climbing Mount Improbable but I would guess that it is much better. Why else would he have re-written the same book ten years later?
Is the review positive or negative? 