Negative Positive
Title: Voodoo nonsense
Review: One clue that a book is bad is when the author claims that everyone else is wrong. Well, everyone else isn't wrong. Harvey uses poor methodologies, invalid math and superstitions to come to conclusions long proved to be false. For some reason, he takes time to insult the serious researchers along the way. Science is developed by standing on the shoulders of giants. Harvey simply tossed all their good work and started from scratch. Yes every science can be improved. But here, good work is thrown out and substituted with concepts found in other famously poor books like those of John Patrick and Jerry Patterson.
Is the review positive or negative? 