Negative Positive
Title: Overly simpflified intentionalist view
Review: Having done a comprehensive study of the New Deal for my A level history course, I found this text to insufficiently deal with the issues. It is clear that Leuchtenberg concentrates on the role of the individual to a much greater extent than historians such as Flynn and Johnson, and as such, his argument is flawed when compared with other such historians. This book belongs in a different era, and I believe that it does not contain the reliability of source that other more modern interpretations do. I would recommend this book only as evidence of a source which needs to be disproved.
Is the review positive or negative? 