Negative Positive
Title: Why not read a compenent author?
Review: Ms. Anderson starts by stating a popular lie: That Wicca is an ancient religion. She seems to confuse folk-lore and history in an alarmning way.Why not start with one of the "classic" "Intro-to-Wicca" texts, such as Cunningham, the Farrars, etc? They don't ask you to shell out money to buy a book that contains mostly blank pages!I'm alarmed at the people aparently reading this book of mis-information and thinking, "This is Wicca". I would far prefer that newcomers to the faith started with an author who has actually done some research and knows what they're talking about.
Is the review positive or negative? 