Negative Positive
Title: Dishonest writing
Review: If one is writing fiction, then one can freely tamper with the FACTS, BUT IF ONE IS writing history, or attempting to write history, it is an essential duty to remain honest. Instead, Loomis is dishonest, invents from whole cloth and deliberately alters quotations from source to make it appear to say the opposite of what they really are saying. As such, this book should be held up as an example of dishonest writing.
Is the review positive or negative? 