Negative Positive
Title: Mythology and Mistakes abound
Review: Glenn Tucker's work may make a good story, but unfortunately it doesnt make for accurate history. Chickamauga: Bloody Battle in the West presents a very flawed history of events that occured in that Battle of Chickamauga, from Claiming a courier Missed seeing a whole Divison in the Woods to laying too much blame on Bragg for mistakes that were shared with other commanders. Its better to get Cozzens, Woodworth, or Robertson's books on this battle if you are after an accurate version of events.
Is the review positive or negative? 