Negative Positive
Title: A classic that will be useful for decades (at least)
Review: Geologist/biologist John Woodmorappe takes on scores of skeptical attacks on the plausibility of the biblical account of Noah's Ark, demonstrating the feasibility of the project. Drawing solely from scientific literature using proven techniques that do not require high technology, Woodmorappe proves that the critics' attacks do not hold water.I have seen anti-creationists get very angry over this work, but I have not seen them make even one dent in the scholarship found therein (saying something is filled with "poor logic," etc., and showing it by example are two different things). Apart from minor updates to deal with new techniques and any new attacks that are dreamt up, this book should remain a classic and a handy reference to refute critics for many years. A must-have reference for origins scholars.
Is the review positive or negative? 