Negative Positive
Title: Not what it is hyped to be
Review: When I purchased this, I assumed it was one of the best arguments for a godless philosophy. Instead what I find is a, although structured, very unconvincing book. Not to mention in the few areas that he talks on Buddhism, he just has an assertion with no evidence to back it up. While he does recommend many other books at the end of sections of his book, this seems to be very distracting. And when he talks on politics, it just feels so... I am not to sure how to describe it. An attempt to be comprehensive, but falling VERY short of it even being worth reading. The most interesting part of the book, to me, was his personal story of how he became an atheist. Yet even this felt like it needed some filling in, like something/s had been left out.
Is the review positive or negative? 