Negative Positive
Title: Dated, Biased, Bilious, and Inaccurate
Review: Yeesh. This is supposed to be some kind of reference book? Only for the deluded, or perhaps for "crones" with crewcuts and plaid shirts with an ax to grind. Yes, it's entertaining, if you totally ignore the misquoting of sources and the out-and-out invention of "facts" which, in this far-too-long tome, are as numerous as the manufactured miracles of the middle ages. I spotted several errors almost immediately and have since checked out many of the ones mentioned below. Better this book should have been written by it's critics--at least their references prove out!
Is the review positive or negative? 