Negative Positive
Title: Ross again misleads and misrepresents science.
Review: If one could be sued for slandering science and logic Ross would be a primetarget. It is a toss-up, or throw-up, which fraud is worse, that of Ross or thatof Gish and Morris. Lederman, Einstein, Fermi, Hawking, Dennett, and Darwin must belaughing or crying over this misrepresentation and lame attempt at self-justificationand zealous misuse of paper and print. I suggest that Ross do some realreseach (his degree suggests he knows how). He may learn a little from some secondarysources about the issue by reading Dennett's "Darwin's Dangerous Idea" or any of Dawkinsbooks on the subject. He should also take a few basic logic courses, he seems to havemissed or failed those subjects in his educational pursuits.
Is the review positive or negative? 