Negative Positive
Title: Woefully ill informed
Review: I am not sure how anyone can take this work as being a serious scholarly work. The author bases their "theories" not on fact, but on wild assumptions and vague accusations. These same ideas were repeated in the internet movie "Zeitgeist" and are woefully uninformed. She makes claims that are unprovable and then asserts that there is some sort of conspiracy theory in which scholars and historians have re-wrote history. This same idea has been repeated by Brian Flemming, Bill Maher, and a host of other militant atheists in an attempt to mislead people.I love challenges, but this was just full of deceit in an attempt to prove the authors assumptions. So, she assumes something, then uses conjecture and assumptions to prove her own assumptions. This is far from scholarly, but weak minded people unable to do research get caught up in this garbage. I have little patience for blatant liars in my field of study, and Archaya S. is one of them.
Is the review positive or negative? 