Negative Positive
Title: Coulter re-writes it like it wasn't.
Review: Having gone through the book and all of it's sources thus far I can only say that it is a poor example of an attempt at revisionist history at best and a asthetically caustic and socially deleterious work of fiction at worst. Coulter, though her new book, in the same breath condemns history for not having been bent to her extreme and alarming perspective as she becomes a parody of herself with such exaggerated chicken-little claims of treachery. It's worth glancing over in the bookstore to prove my point, but not much else.
Is the review positive or negative? 