Negative Positive
Title: Senasational? Yes! History, NO!!
Review: After writing a paper on the French Revolution, I found 4 basic schools of thought: 1. Favorable, 2. Balanced pro and con. 3. Critical but based on reasoned judgement and 4. Hostile and absurd. Loomis is a prime example of the latter, inventing many incidents out of thin air. In one case, he took a priumary source and omitted one word that altered the entire meanng to the opposite of what the writer intended. Loomis was deliberatly falsifying history, an unpardonable sin for a legitimate, which Loomis is not. Instead, he is merely a sensatioal writer of fiction.
Is the review positive or negative? 