Negative Positive
Title: A grossly biased polemic, but here's an excellent review pointing out and refuting its misdirections!
Review: This book is a grossly biased anti-Baha'i polemic by a longtime Christian missionary to the Middle East who was embittered because frankly, despite all his efforts, far more people were becoming Baha'i than Christian. He uses lots of half-truths that "seem" to point to a certain (false) conclusion, and then allows the reader to draw this false conclusion without, of course, bothering to offer any correction or clarification to it.An excellent review of this book (available at various Baha'i web sites, including the one I'm naming below) points out Miller's use of this technique as well as highlighting some of the other defects of the book. There are many, many far more accurate sources of information about the Baha'i Faith than this book, including plenty of objective non-Baha'i sources. Detailed review is "The Missionary as Historian" at the bahai-library.org website.
Is the review positive or negative? 