Negative Positive
Title: How come McGraw Hill published this and Electronic Day Trade
Review: How is it possible that McGraw Hill published this book and Electronic Day Trader. Have they no shame? Are they just trying to capitalize on Electronic Day Trader's suprising success? Why don't they publish a more serious second volume of Electronic Day Trader for the advanced trader instead of just trying to skim the commercial cream. Publishing is a responsibility, particularly, in the financial arena. A waiver in the front of the book maybe legal, but there is a moral responsibility. Doesn't McGraw Hill understand that "at the end of the day" they share responsible for those readers trading on the skewed information they supply. Though not as extreme, it is similar to talk show host who set up situations where contestants get killed i.e.Jenny Jones and then disclaim responsibility and 1st amendment protection.
Is the review positive or negative? 