Negative Positive
Title: Religious dogma masquerading as scientific theory
Review: From a recent letter by PEER to the Director of the National Park Service, regarding sales of this book at the Grand Canyon bookstore:'On January 25, 2004 David Shaver, the Chief of the Park Service's Geologic Resources Division sent a memo (enclosed) to NPS Headquarters calling for removal of the book, concluding -- "Our review of ...NPS policies and Grand Canyon: A Different View, lead us to conclude that this book: does not use accurate, professional and scholarly knowledge; is not based on science but a specific religious doctrine; does not further the public's understanding of the Grand Canyon's existence; does not further the mission of the National Park Service...and finally, that this book should not have been approved for sale in NPS affiliated book sales."'Enough said, I think. Let's not waste time on pseudoscience.
Is the review positive or negative? 