Negative Positive
Title: Leaves much to be desired!
Review: Where are the footnotes? There's a bibliography but where did he get the information for his most 'profound' statements? This is an interesting story but when an author claims to know the intentions of people 2000 years ago he needs to clearly state his sources. Whoever claims that this book seals the deal for them is a person who read this book 'wanting' the 'answers' in this book.I read this book with an open mind and finished with pages of questions that were raised and not answered. Now I'm rereading it and trying to find and read the books in the bibliography and find out who the authors are and what their agenda was. Everyone has an agenda.This book is may be a starting point for the quest for truth but should not be an ending point. For a book that is supposed to be so critical to our people, the time should have been taken to carefully document everything.
Is the review positive or negative? 