Negative Positive
Title: Kookery
Review: Sadly, a rather predictable Christ-myther rant. Typically for the genre, the author has not consulted any primary sources, choosing instead to focus on publications of dubious authority, from hyper-Presbyterian polemic (Hislop's ... more "The Two Babylons") to confabulated works of "freethinkers" like G.A. Wells, whose own works are full of assertions that are not and cannot be bibliographically supported. Even the title of the book is less than honest : far from being an examination of the evidence, it is a jaw-dropping tour through a psyche so distorted by its own assumptions that it is literally incapable of entertaining for a moment any thought which has not been produced by them. From the publisher that also brings us the quasi-factual fantasies of Zechariah Sitchin and a (pseudonymous, one assumes) Joan d'Arc; possibly useful in busy households as a hedge against a shortage of toilet paper.
Is the review positive or negative? 