Negative Positive
Title: Ludicrous and historically incorrect arguments
Review: .If conservatives truly look to someone like Ann Coulter to be a leader in championing their positions, then conservatism is worse off than I thought it was.I've noticed many reviewers claim this is a factual accounting of the McCarthy era. You might want to strongly reconsider that.One of the main sources that Ann footnotes is Ron Radosh. He is considered one of the most reputable scholars who has studied the McCarthy era in great detail.He is apparently appalled by this book. This is what he had to say:"I am furious and upset about her book. I am reading it - she uses my stuff, Harvey Klehr and John Haynes, Allen Weinstein etc. to distort what we actually say and to make ludicrous and historically incorrect arguments."Rather humiliating, wouldn't you say?.
Is the review positive or negative? 