Negative Positive
Title: Writers get to describe their fantasies....
Review: Chris B. has a thing with girl-on-girl (...). I've read other books by him and it seems to be something he gets off on (not always girl-on-girl, --that only happens in this book.) In fact, it's like he wanted to write about it so then built the plot and characters around it. Which is fine, I mean hey, that's a writer's perrogative. I just didn't buy WHY Allie loved Dana so much, --I didn't feel any sparks from the first moment they met-- would a woman really lust after such a slight, effeminate man to the point where she wouldn't care if he became a woman? I just didn't buy the strength of that relationship. And when narrating from the four characters' POV, the writing was all very similar: meaning I didn't really get four distinct "feels" from them. The writing was pretty much the same across the board. I just thought this was an unrealistic, gratoutious and unbelievable story.
Is the review positive or negative? 