Negative Positive
Title: The sequel is much better!
Review: Okay, so we've read "The Da Vinci Code" and now we all have to get a copy of this book so we can be introduced to Robert Langdon and find out all about him. As in "The Da Vinci Code", Dan Brown is obviously a man who does his research before applying it to paper. Everything he wrote in this book is factual, with the exception of antimatter being that's in a state of scientific development. However, I did not find this book to be as exciting as the sequel. In fact, it lost steam before the last sixty or so pages after the crisis was taken care of. And, it leaves some loose ends with the villain's fate being a mystery.In all, the only reason this book is selling so well is because of "The Da Vinci Code". If it weren't for that book, "Angels & Demons" would be a book no one out there would even care about. Still, pretty goo.
Is the review positive or negative? 