Negative Positive
Title: not another one...
Review: oh dear. ms crowley seems to have missed the point somewhat. yeah, okay, so she has thrown in the basics. yeah, she touches base on most of the major topics of interest. unfortunately, in doing so, she shows her wiccan bias to the full. in a book like this one, the bias must be strictly non-specific, as it would otherwise violate the point. she puts forward the notion that 'all pagans' do certain things, but even the pagan federation can't find common enough ground for such statements.in general, it's wishy-washy, puerile, pointlessness in book form. i can ignore the wiccan bias (by now, i'm getting used to it) but i can't ignore innacurate information from a condescending child-psychologist type. there's many better books out there.
Is the review positive or negative? 