Negative Positive
Title: Wolfram needs to read the latest literature
Review: Cellular automata is not new. The use of CA for modelling is not new. The theories that he disputes are not current. It is similar to arguing that his science is new because it refutes the fact that we are not the center of the universe. The only way any of this would get published in a reviewed journal is if he paid the editor. Which is exactly what he did to get this published.
Is the review positive or negative? 