Negative Positive
Title: Solid history of the first Crusade
Review: This book is a bit older and hence some of the research is out dated, but Harold Lamb does a terrific job of not giving a biased perspective (something that is not always done when dealing with this subject). In addition, some of the details of the book are scarcely found in other accounts. The book has a narrative flow which makes for an interesting read. In contrast to its title the book only deals with the first crusade but as such it is an invaluable resource on such.
Is the review positive or negative? 