Negative Positive
Title: Get the Physics Right Next Time
Review: A novel about reconciling science and religion would be worthwhile, but you need to get the science right or at least plausible. I ran into a dozen "Give me a breaks" before I put this book down in disgust. Some of these are that gravity is 30% less at 60,000 feet (it's 0.3% less), using tuna to disprove the theory of relativity, and making antimatter proves God's existence (physicists have know about antimatter since the 1920s and first made antiprotons in the 1950s). Despite thanking CERN and Brookhaven in the acknowledgements, it's clear that Mr. Brown didn't have a physicist or even a high school physics student proofread this book.
Is the review positive or negative? 