Negative Positive
Title: extremely poor representation of male anatomy
Review: Is it accurate to depict men's genitals minus the foreskin and to completely overlook any reference to foreskin in the book (including the index)? Considering 80% + of the men and boys of the world have a foreskin and more specifically 65% + of the men and boys in the United States have a foreskin, this renders this book's depiction of the circumcised penis a completely inaccurate accounting of the male anatomy.That you would attempt to portray the circumcised penis in your book as natural and whole is an affront to all people who value giving men and boys a CHOICE to determine the fate of their own bodies and a CHANCE to enjoy all of the benefits that remaining INTACT can offer them and their future partners.
Is the review positive or negative? 