Negative Positive
Title: An evoluntionary zealot revealed as a fraud
Review: For anyone looking for a brilliant rebuttal of Dawkins' evolutionary model, read Lee Spetner's Not By Chance.In particular, chapter 6 of Spetner's book reveals Dawkins' methodology and conclusions for the tripe that they are. Spetner illustrates that not only does Dawkins make radical, unsubstantiated assumptions about the probability of natural selection as an explanation for human life, but that Dawkins lacks a basic understanding of the astronomical odds involved in his rather nonsensical theories. Given that Spetner holds a PhD in physics from MIT, and has a far superior grasp of probability theory, one wonders why Dawkins continues to have any commercial success at all. I can only say that after reading Spetner, Dawkins cannot be taken seriously. The man is as much of a zealot as any creationist, if not more.
Is the review positive or negative? 