Negative Positive
Title: i have a question...
Review: if Coulter's book is so factual as some of you have said, then why hasnt she sued Al Franken for calling her a liar when he proves in his book that all her references are misguiding and in most cases flat out lies? i'm sure Ms. Coulter knows that Franken would be libelous. where's the next book? perhaps reading isn't her strong point. that could be a reason for all the "fact" fabrication. Here's a tip for all of you: read a history book, not a joke book.
Is the review positive or negative? 