Negative Positive
Title: Am I missing something here?
Review: I agree with the other reviewers comments on this book. How accurate are passed down stories from ancestors many generations back. While reading the book I had no idea which "facts" were from historical accounts or which came from passed down stories. Also, "the white man" as portrayed by the author is evil, selfish, greedy, and full of lies while the Indians were brave, valiant, honest, and trustworthy. yeahhhh right. I have read enough factual historical accounts that show Indians as being every bit as corrupt as the white man. The only difference is the whites were greater in number and were intellectually superior when it came to developing weapons. The author is clearly biased. I don't recall him ever putting down the Indians for their savage scalping or pointless raids on other tribes, but as soon as the whites leave behind some trash on the trail it is noted. Not impressed at all.
Is the review positive or negative? 