Negative Positive
Title: Bad science fiction
Review: Dawkins did not invent circular reasoning but he has certainly perfected it. It's amazing how many presumably bright people buy into his hogwash.For the record, I've been an atheist since I was 6 years old and have no interest in the creationist agenda, nor in the young earth agenda. But the evolutionary facts nevertheless suggest design. They most certainly do not suggest accident. And while it is abundantly clear that creatures evolve, it is just as clear that Darwinism is not the driving force behind evolution. The fact is that we do not have any idea what drives evolution but there does appear to be a design to it. What is so unfortunate about Dawkin's drivel is that real evolutionary science is at a standstill and will be until his generation dies.It's hard to determine whether Dawkins is not very bright or simply dishonest, The way in which he ignores valid arguments against his positions and engages in ad hominem attacks suggests the latter.
Is the review positive or negative? 