Negative Positive
Title: Worst Book on Economics
Review: Some people seem to mistake bad writing for brilliance in content. The reason that many reviews seem to have trouble understanding some of the contents in the book should be an argument against the book, not an argument for its technical difficulties derived from some people's own uncertainty about their skills in maths.I thoroughly advise people not to waste time looking into this book, let alone buy it which will be a waste of money as well.I have not found a perfect macroeconomics textbook yet. But David Romer's Advanced Macroeconomics is much better than this one in every way.
Is the review positive or negative? 