Negative Positive
Title: So much for historically accurate&#65533;.
Review: .If conservatives truly look to someone like Ann Coulter to be a leader in espousing their positions, then conservatism is worse off than I thought it was.For those who actually believe that Ann Coulter's Treason is a factual accounting of the McCarthy era, think again. One of the main sources that Ann footnotes is Ron Radosh. He is considered one of the most reputable scholars who have studied the McCarthy era in great detail.He is apparently appalled at Ms. Coulter's writings. This is what he had to say:"I am furious and upset about her book. I am reading it - she uses my stuff, Harvey Klehr and John Haynes, Allen Weinstein etc. to distort what we actually say and to make ludicrous and historically incorrect arguments...."I'll give it two stars for the amusement factor..
Is the review positive or negative? 