Negative Positive
Title: Definitely not a sequel
Review: No need for me to go into depth on a story summary here, but I will say that the production values in this are pretty low and parts of it look as though they were shot on a low-end Handycam. Arthur Agee's involvement seems to be sporadic in parts. He's heavily featured through about the first half and the the second half he sort of disappears. Is he the narrator or a featured personality? The producers can't seem to decide.
Is the review positive or negative? 