Negative Positive
Title: it is unethical to read this book on ethics
Review: This author is perhps the worst scholar I've read. In the first two chapters he breaks so many ethical codes that the irony hits the reader in the face. He quotes no sources and offers no authority to back up his redefinition. He uses out-dated theories and offers to literary review to help the reader understand the field. This is not a good book.
Is the review positive or negative? 