Negative Positive
Title: Hyperbole will get you nowhere
Review: I am neither liberal or conversative, but the mere title of this book which equates an entire branch of political philosophy (a branch that does not agree with itself) with treason is not only unconversative, but a Maoist style tactic of propaganda.The claims are mostly hyperbole and any decent conservative thinker would be appalled at the blanket condemnation. It is a Radical Right thing to do, but may I remind you that Radical Right and Conversative are not the same thing. A conversative is not a reactionary, a conversative does not sling hyperbole.Even conversatives that use hyperbole well . . . such as Florence King, Arthur Herman, Norman Podhoretz, and P. J. O'Rourke as well as conversative thinkers like Walker Percy would be appalled. Indeed, Miss Coulter seems to make more of a carear out of bashing liberals than actually defining a point. Its not a point that is going to make a neo-conversative viewpoint more appealing.
Is the review positive or negative? 