Negative Positive
Title: Proof you can win a Nobel and still be a dimwit
Review: I'm wary of people who write outside their area of expertise, and this book is a good example. Mullis is a big fan of astrology, yet he ignores the fact that astrology uses such sweeping generalizations that it could (and does) describe anybody. He also advocates exterminating a type of spider and says that environmentalists are liars. Why? A spider bit him, and he didn't like the explanation for why spiders bite.The one good thing about Mullis is that he made me want to make a few calls to the local university and find out the other flaws in his thinking.
Is the review positive or negative? 