Negative Positive
Title: A whiny, extremist rant.
Review: If you're looking for objective, astute, reasoned, rational political analysis, you won't find it here with this whiny, extremist rant. Coulter takes historical events and spins them to reach predetermined conclusions. Those conclusions are not facts, just opinions (and myopic, narrow minded, mean-spirited, illogical opinions at that). If that's what you want to read, go ahead, this book is for you. Turn off your brain and enjoy. To Coulter's credit, I don't think she tries to even pretend she's objective or accurate. She's just spoonfeeding the extremists what they want to hear and she more or less admits it. Objectivity, accuracy or anything that doesn't support their narrow-minded point of view is not what they're looking for. So, why bother with those little details?
Is the review positive or negative? 