Negative Positive
Title: A trial from hell
Review: We know the ending - but how did it start? Why did a prosecutor who violated his own oath to "seek justice first" pursue Martha Stewart with a vengeance and even made up fraudulent charges? Why did the mainstream media conspire to taint the jury pool in New York? Why did a biased judge deny Martha her rights? Why was a man who lied to get seated at her trial, who hated Martha, and who had a criminal record, permitted to sit in judgment? Why did the jurors accuse her lawyers of not putting on a defense?Martha Stewart's trial and conviction is a blot on the escutcheon of our judicial system. She was denied the presumption of innocence and was pronounced guilty by a mob mentality. Hers was a trial from hell.The book attempts to explain the injustice done to Martha Stewart.
Is the review positive or negative? 