Negative Positive
Title: a new kind of science? yes. A good kind of science? no!.
Review: The only thing I learned was to be wary of the media that hypes up non-events. So what if Wolfram is a genious or an ex-child prodigy. He doesnt have anything interesting to say. He displays interesting patterns with similarities to natural patterns. Is there a connection? How?There is also a tendency to not credit others who have related or competing theories in complexity. It sounds like he merely selling his ideas like one sells a commercial product. I hope this is not how science is done in this century.
Is the review positive or negative? 