Negative Positive
Title: That's What Makes Horse Races
Review: I guess it just goes to show you how widely tastes differ! I found this book to be poorly structured and plotted, with paper-thin characterization, too much reliance on coincidence, poor worldbuilding, and intrusive Britishisms that detracted from the realism of the supposedly-American dialogue. There are better novels, in terms of entertainment value, that begin from similar theses (including its central motif, that Ronald Reagan was {"is", at the time of writing} the only person who truly understood the Red Menace).
Is the review positive or negative? 