Negative Positive
Title: Condescending, arrogant and narrow-minded look at Lyme.
Review: Barbour cleverly reviews some of the literature, dismisses entirely or denigrates what doesn't support his hypotheses, and ignores clinical and patient experience to paint a very narrow view of what Lyme is and is not in his eyes. The insensitivity displayed towards patients is only driven home by his patronizing condescension. Patient overviews not only appear oversimple, but faked.Barbour doesn't seem to understand that his academic posturing may intimidate his colleagues into buying his ideas, but doesn't necessarily work when trying to sell his ideas to the thinking public.A book that leaves you snowed, slapped and spitting. And very glad the author is not your doctor.Rita L. Stanley, Ph.D
Is the review positive or negative? 