Negative Positive
Title: academically worthless
Review: Dawkins offers logically fallacious arguments at best. His darwinian religionist bias colors his interpretation of observed phenomena. He approaches his subject with the philosophical, apriori assumption of naturalism which he fails to establish. His naturalistic, materialistic, physicalist worldview is contradicted by his desire to utilize non-natural, non-physical, non-material entities like laws of logic, and induction. The title to Dawkins' book is apropos, for in the end he clings to his darwinian religion the way all evolutionists do - by blind faith.
Is the review positive or negative? 