Negative Positive
Title: Koontz has been better
Review: Am I the only one who thinks that if Koontz did not write with so many metaphors etc. this book could have been 300 pages instead of 600. Ever since STRANGERS and THE WATCHERS I have yet to enjoy any of his books. SOLE SURVIVOR wasn't bad. I feel Koontz's writing is too embellished and monotonous. I was falling asleep trying to keep up with all his wordy paragraphs. After trudging through 300 pages I finally put the book away because I found it too disgusting. I know this may be a turn on to some but it just went too far for me. I got to a point where I really didn't even care about anyone anymore. However I personally felt if Koontz could have cut out half of the boring narrative, maybe I would've finished the book - actually I would have since I read 300 pages and that is about how thick the story should have been!
Is the review positive or negative? 