Negative Positive
Title: Long-Winded
Review: Reading this book will probably be satisfactory for supplementing whatever class you're taking, but God is it boring. The author takes 5-6 pages to get around to saying anything at all, so by the time you've finished reading a thirty page chapter you realize the good bits could have been explained in four pages.The book's biggest hinderance is that the author reflects a less than satisfactory understanding of ethics. I may be wrong, but it seems that in order to write a book about ethics as they pertain to the mass media one should have at least a fair understanding of ethics in general. You'll find a better explanation of historically influential ethicists and their teachings on a poorly written wiki article.
Is the review positive or negative? 