Negative Positive
Title: Same old stuff
Review: I cannot recommend this book. It's the same old stuff, an establishment archaeologist clinging to 1930's theories. He closes his mind to paradigm shattering works that render this book obsolete--works like "Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings" by Hapgood; "The Origin Map" by Brophy; and "Giza Powerplant," by Dunn. Instead of addressing the theories of researchers like Z. Sitchin, he unscientifically dismisses them with an unscientific smirk and a laugh, exposing an unwillingness to inspect anything that violates his establishment prejudices.
Is the review positive or negative? 