Negative Positive
Title: fascinating
Review: "Like many pseudoscience texts, this book starts out with an empty assertion that it really `is science'. Unlike actual scientific theories which make no such assertion, and are formalised, systemized and then presented for correction in appropiate [sic] journals, this book is scantily referenced in the literature as `Dawkins' intuition'."Oh, really? 1) "Actual scientific theories" don't claim to be scientific? What ARE you smoking? 2) This is a POPULAR science book for the LAYMAN. Get over it!"To call it selfish that a unit of selection has a chance of reproduction is a nonstandard use of selfish."The author is using the term "selfish" FIGURATIVELY! It makes a catchy title, okay? Go review "Batman" or something, will you?
Is the review positive or negative? 