Negative Positive
Title: Weak on battle strategy, hyper-critical of Naopleon.
Review: I have read numerous better books on Napoleon. Mr. Schom easily confuses during descriptions of Napoleons campaigns and battles. This is compunded several-fold by the near total absence of maps. It appears hardly credible to me that Napoleon was as stupid or as lucky as Mr. Schom would have us believe. I'll stick to Chandler or Zweig.
Is the review positive or negative? 