Negative Positive
Title: Not what you pay for
Review: I ordered this for a relative of mine as a Christmas gift, thinking it was the version pictured. Why shouldn't it be? I mean, there's a picture of it, and if it's not really what it says it is, isn't that illegal??? Anyway, I read the other reviews for the item which were posted months earlier, hoping that Amazon had straightened the issue out and now offered the latest version pictured instead of the older edition which is only complete up until June 2006. I was wrong. The version that I received, 3 days before Christmas, is in fact the older edition. It is not the amazing gift that I had imagined, in fact, this Amazing Spiderman collection isn't really amazing at all. My recommendation is to buy elsewhere, where you know that what you get is what you paid for. Speaks very lowly of Amazon as a whole. What else will I buy that is not the same as what is pictured???
Is the review positive or negative? 