Negative Positive
Title: Worst book I've read in ages.
Review: It doesn't contain any interesting science, the 'alternative' stuff is pointless, the political views are mis-informed and self-contradicting, the writing gets progessively poorer to where the latter part of the book is hard to read, and I can't imagine that it would be any fun talking to the guy.I did draw one thing interesting from the book: There's no reason to assume that Nobel Prize winners are other than discovers of something that turned out to be really useful. Which left me a little disappointed.
Is the review positive or negative? 