Negative Positive
Title: Wow! Even worse than the Da Vinci Code!
Review: How does this jerk and his publishers get away with it? Dan Brown's books are so apallingly researched and error-ridden that it really is an insult. I'm not driven by any ideology, nor am I pedantic - but it's the writer himself who pretentiously claims the details in this book to be "fact" in the preface. I find it impossible to enjoy a book when every page is riddled with simple error. For goodness' sake, "My First Book of Art" or a simple map of Rome is all you need to find them! As for the so-called "Art Expert" (Robert Langdon), he has got to be the the most ignorant art teacher on the face of the planet. I'm insulted by such blatant disregard for accuracy, and depressed by the low standards of the reading public.
Is the review positive or negative? 