Negative Positive
Title: This author is confused
Review: I have a few problems with this book.Firstly, I struggled with the grammar and found it difficult to believe that the author ever proof read it. He is, after all, a lawyer .... clearly, legal writing is not his strong suit. The book is riddled with puntuation errors and incorrect capitalization.Secondly, the author could not decide whether to write an autobiography or a piece of fiction and finally produced a hybrid. The result is disapppointing and leaves the reader, familiar with the country and history, with more questions than answers.In some cases it is far-fetched. I cannot believe that Rhodesia's prosecutors ever took part in clandestine operations. I was there and, from my experience, they rarely left the cities.All in all, disappointing and I was left with a feeling of disatisfaction with the whole book. Sadly, what could have been an excellent autobiography or piece of fiction is neither.
Is the review positive or negative? 