Negative Positive
Title: Bugliosi and Posner are lawyers - not historians
Review: For a book of this magnitude it's AMAZING how many FACTS this seasoned prosecutor ignores. Bugliosi fails to question the credibility or motives of his "witnesses", while ignoring the most credible sources from day one.Like Posner, he is NOT a trained historian, as such, this book is written from a lawyer's perspective and is not an honest analysis of the evidence - it's a prosecution of Oswald.For all of the overwhelming evidence pointing to conspiracy, Bugliosi is unable to answer the most obvious: How does a bullet (CE 399) lose more grains of metal than it had when it was new? More grains of metal were removed from Connolly's wrist wound alone than were missing from 399.Answer that question, and i may consider Oswald as lone-nut. Otherwise, don't waste my time.
Is the review positive or negative? 