Negative Positive
Title: A Designer is Not An Answer
Review: This book pretends to be some edgy challenge to "political correctness" when it's merely a standard unthinking retread of the usual fallacies and ideological nonsense the creationist crowd is so fond of. Invoking an intelligent designer as an answer to the complexity of life is no answer at all. It's explaining complexity we have evidence for (the universe) with complexity we have no evidence for (the designer) and stopping there instead of going on to provide an explanation for the designer itself when the existence of an intelligent designer would demand at least as much explanation as the universe it created. And isn't it funny that it presents intelligent design as a nonreligious, scientific viewpoint when its advocates all just HAPPEN to be religious?
Is the review positive or negative? 