Negative Positive
Title: bunch of nonsense
Review: This book is built of figments that cannot be verified experimentally because of their very definition (Many Worlds) or have failed experimental verification (darwinism, etc.), nor on other grounds. Most of the book revolves around the Many Worlds, an idea that is by definition non-sense (see among other Jonathan Harrison's paper "The Impossibility of 'Possible Worlds'" in Philosophy v. 74, n. 287 (Jan. 1999.) I could write a lot to debunk the numerous absurdities contained in this book, but it does not deserve receiving more scientific consideration than Alice in the Wonderland.
Is the review positive or negative? 