You are considering whether to buy a product. You look at the reviews. Would the following review decrease or increase the chances of you buying the product?
Review title: Odd mix of fact/fanasy supports author's claim to throne
Product review: Disguised as straight history, this book is actually an polemic by someone calling himself "H.R.H. Prince Michael ... Head of the House of Stewart," pretender to the Scottish throne. The Prince's claim is based on his alleged descent from the second marriage (previously unknown to historians) of Bonnie Prince Charles. Among the interesting "facts" conveyed in its pages are: Napoleon was a Stuart; Marshall Ney escaped execution and was carried off to live in America; all Stuart monarchs were capable, wise, and tolerant, especially James II; there is a conspiracy of British officialdom and historians to convince people that the legitimate line of Stuarts died out in the 18th century. Amusing example of how to mix fact and fantasy and create an entirely new version of "history."
