You are considering whether to buy a product. You look at the reviews. Would the following review decrease or increase the chances of you buying the product?
Review title: Uneven, unconvincing, superficial
Product review: Klizer lost his credibility on page 30 when he quotes Hess saying he turned his plane inverted so he could drop out and parachute down, and while he was dropping out he righted the plane and re-started the engine (so it would "hurtle to earth"). This is physically impossible, and otherwise non-sensical.The uneveness is between the early pages, which have a jerky and coy quality reminiscent of a lot of low end writing, and a marked change in tone to the sweeping style of a professional historian. It seems that two persons are writing the book.Maybe it's the lack of consistency, but I get the feeling that the historian is paraphrasing somebody else.The footnotes are mainly to secondary sources, like newspaper articles. It seems the research was simply compiling statements by others without any independent original work
