Title: A bad introduction lacking in "good proofs"
Review: According to my instructor for this course, I would not receive an A (or probably a B) if I wrote my proofs like Fitzpatrick does. The book leaves out many details and is overall very aggrivating. A good introduction to analysis should be composed of detailed, carefully worked out proofs that can suit anyone from an advanced learner to a beginner. This book, however, functions more like an outline, leaving you to fill in blanks that may be impossible to infer.
Is this product review negative?