Title: Huh?
Review: This would have been a great story, but the author doesn't seem to be able to keep on track. Events are discussed and then brought up two or three times again in the book as though they were happening for the first time in the story. Extremely disjointed with no thought flow. The reader is then inundated with page after page after page (at several points in the book) of technical ballistics evidence which I believe should have been kept at a minimum in order not to induce boredom. I have read over 750 true crime books in my life, but this is absolutely the first one that I did not finish reading. It was simply too confusing and frustrating to try to keep up with the author's train of thought. Great story subject, just not well written.
Is this product review negative?