Title: Best arguments from the book refuted in Mind 114 (2005), pp 145-149
Review: From reading Hume's Abject Failure by Ehrman to A Defense of Hume on Miracles by Fogelin, one may wonder where Hume's argument against Miracles stands in our contemporary times in analytic philosophy.Professor of Philosophy, Timothy McGrew answered that question in the philosophy Journal, Mind 114 (2005), pp. 145-49.Essentially, Fogelin's defense fails. But don't take my word for it, read the abstract I cited from one of the most well respected academic philosophy Journals that has stood the test of time. I can't bring justice to Timothy McGrews argument but to point you to it and say, the buck doesn't stop here. If you're really interested in where Hume stands, this is not the last book to read.
Is this product review negative?