Title: In all seriousness...
Review: People calling for this book to be pulled/banned: you don't understand the importance of free speech and a free press. This book has obviously taken on an entirely different context given that this guy has been outed as a pedophile, basically the worst thing that a person can be. And yet we protect free access to anything ever said or written for the principle that it is important to almost never censor anything for any reason. People might want to read this book for research in understanding Sandusky, for instance. A journalist, for example. Perhaps there are even things in the book that provide illuminating hints about what he was up to. But at the very least it must contain some basic information that a researcher might use in an effort to document who this person was and what he has done. The book becomes a record of who this awful person is/was, and that's important to have even as we despise the guy. Get it?
Is this product review negative?