Title: Classic, but unscientific
Review: A classic!Adults should communicate with young readers, because of a few problematic issues. The world view is that of its day, it was originally published in 1812. Errors in taxonomy, botany, chemistry, phylogeny, biology, geography, medicine are plentiful. I believe there was some old-fashioned ideas about "races of men" also. Some words are used in their archaic form, such as "faggot", which need to be explained to young readers.
Is this product review negative?