Title: Title and authorship of Corwin is fraudulent
Review: The original work, of which this one claims to be an update, is a three-volume collection of essays by Edward S. Corwin, edited by Richard Loss, which I recommend. This is a summary of the opinions in landmark court cases, with an emphasis on those that Corwin disagreed with and considered unconstitutional. Nothing about this book is authored by Corwin, and, based on his actual writings, one must conclude that he would not have approved of his name being attached to it. This is a rather crude attempt to legitimize the many ways that the Constitution has been and is being violated. Read it, if you must, as revisionist doctrine and what statists would like to have you believe is established constitutional interpretation.
Is this product review negative?