Title: A rather transparent effort to shore up baseless lawsuits
Review: The consistently one-sided and superficial nature of anti-gun writing amazes me. Compared to the high intellectual quality of books like David Kopel's "Guns: Who Should Have Them?" or the criminological works of Gary Kleck and John Lott (both pretty much ignored by Diaz), this book doesn't compete. But in the hothouse atmosphere of antigun writing, it doesn't have to: political correctness and emotionalism substitute for intellectual rigor. There *are* some intellectually respectable antigun writers: Phil Cook, for example, or David Williams. But Diaz isn't one of them. Don't waste your money.
Is this product review negative?