Title: Nepotistic reviews? I think not.
Review: Pardon this "meta-review," but I feel that the review of Oshinky by Oshinsky (of course, a "completely unbiased" Oshinsky) is a farce. I have not read the book, but several of my colleagues have, and all of them praise its merits. This is not the point of my "REVIEW" - my point is, obviously nepotistic "reviews" are as credible as self-referential, author-written "reviews." If you really think that this book should win the Nobel Prize, as well as the Pulitzer, the Tony, the Emmy, the Oscar, et al., then at least use a pseudonym, so that we can take your opinions a little more seriously
Is this product review negative?