Title: Standard reference and a classic text but with flaws
Review: I do not like to consult this book for the following, quite superficial reason. The book is sloppily produced and proofread(and the fault is [probably] mainly the publisher's instead of the author's). This manifests itself, e.g., as follows(1) the typography is flawed (the equations hurt at least my eyes);(2) at its each appearance, the all-important >< -sign goes the wrong way.
Is this product review negative?