Title: Why?
Review: Why was this book written? It could only exist post-Clinton. In a world where we say, "It depends on what the meaning of 'is' is." This book is a bunch of double-speak and useless quotations.This book has no beginning, no ending, and a weak middle. One may notice that most glowing reviews include the big positive that it is so short. The author could have done one better by writing his essay on a napkin in crayon.At least "It depends on what the meaning of 'is' is" is funny. I kept waiting for a reason why this book was written. It is not funny, it is not informative, the conclusion tells one nothing, it is not controversial, and it is not interesting. It is short. Whoopee!
Is this product review negative?