Title: AMORALISM WITHOUT ILLOGIC
Review: In just 42 pages, this book goes a long way toward refuting moralism without relying on self-contradictory relativism. I happen to agree with about 90% of this text. The flaw here is Rollins' implication that natural rights do not exist because they have no physical effectivity. Lack of physical effectivity is not a sufficient argument against something's existence. However, the rest of the debunking is pretty hard hitting.
Is this product review negative?