Title: Pure Truth but who is talking?
Review: This book hits home again and again. The style is all John's own and that's why I think it goes so deep unlike much of the "Advaita Deluxe", spiritual muesli, which is on the non-dual bookshelves now days.While every sentence spoken by John is packed with meaning it is a pity that it not made clear where one dialogue ends with an inquirer and where another starts. If this had been indicated then it help give an additional context and meaning. For example, I know that 'Chapter 7' included an historical exchange with Dave Oshana who one year later became an enlightened teacher with his own unqique style. However, the same chapter merges a discussion with Oshana and another inquirer, and so it is not clear who is talking.Perhaps, the editors made this choice to not distract in any way from John's delivery but for some readers the removal of information lessens the chance to get the full picture.
Is this product review negative?