Title: Panasonic nice look-lowquality
Review: This phone lasted < one month. Pathetic. I threw itout.. By the time you pay for sending it back to a fixit center, packand drive to the mailing point, go without a phone for weeks, it is ahuge inconvenience. Manufactures with lousy product qc, likePanasonic should pay. Panasonic will because I have had it withthem. I bought 6 phones from them recently, ( all $ 200+) and I ambatting 4 out of 6 and have had it. Plus, my last models before theseones were relatively short lived,( two + years) so I gave these guysplenty of chances They sell high priced phones .. in poor quality andI can only assume it is because of lousy management in qc. Panasonichas no problem charging premium prices, but their equipmentperformance follow thorugh is awful. I got suckered by theattractivenss of their products....again THumbs down
Is this product review negative?