Title: Did we read the same book?
Review: I hated this "book" more than most. Firstly, I thought it was a whole lot of examples prooving very few points, like a bad essay. He also seemed to rely on his cumbersome vocabulary as a way of asserting his role as the knowledgeable professor; who does he think he impresses? The value of his words ought to be enough, though he doesn't seem to know this. A writer he is not, and it takes one to be a mainstream author. Also, his biases towards his and Darwin's work was sheer denial of the opposing facts. Even worse, his prejudice on the Leaver tribes in the places he stayed at was ghastly. The whole thing made me retch. Why would anyone read this out of free will? The people who think they enjoyed it probably didn't understand it!
Is this product review negative?