Title: Creationism vs Old earth belief
Review: Dr. Baugh is using the same criteria to argue his case for a young earth as someone who believes in an old earth. He continually groups those who hold an old earth belief as being evolutionists. As was pointed out by the first review. This is what James Ussher did when predicting a 4004BC date which scientists laugh at today. I witnessed a debate between Dr. Hugh Ross(old earth) and Ken Hamm(young earth) and the evidence is clearly there for an old earth. God is supernatural but the case for a young earth cannot be argued by the physical laws, they clearly teach that the earth has been around for longer than 10,000 years. Why would God lead us to believe though science that we have an old earth? Science agrees with biblical revelation. Surely those that hold an old earth view can be do not have to believe in macroevolution.
Is this product review negative?