Title: Logical, but not Biblical
Review: I have spent a great deal of time in Dr. White's book. Many of the arguments seem logical, but are they biblical? For example, he offers an unusual definition of biblical preservation without providing ANY biblical support for his view. He attacks passages those who believe in biblical preservation use, but offers none to support his view. Certainly, his belief in inspiration is supported with Scripture. As would be his belief in biblical inerrancy. But when it comes to biblical transmission, no passage is provided. Strange indeed, for a biblical "scholar."
Is this product review negative?