Title: Garth Brooks doesn't have the raw musical emotion.
Product review: The music of the great rock bands of the past drip with musical emotion--Plant's voice and Page's rythums, Clapton's soles, the piongancy of the Who and Beatles, or the wild bad boy images of the Stones and Aerosmith ferrmenting in their music. Garth doesn't. In fact, Garth doesn't even have such qualities as bad rock stars of today like Smash Mouth. Why, because if not in chronology, atleast in a sense of maturity, Garth is to old for rock and roll. Yes, Steve Tyler is near fifty. Mic and Keith have the angel of death cirlcing over their heads. But they are still young and wild in spirit--a spirit that comes thru on stage and in recordig seesions. Garth's music is not raw and somehow "youthful"; it's not rock and roll. Some may say rock and roll si bad music. Well, I don't think so but maybe; it doesn't matter. Garth has as failed in an attempt to play not good or bad music but rock and roll.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
