Title: Despite the previous reviews, this book is seriously flawed
Product review: Even though this book is well written, the author made conclusions that were unsupported by the facts. The Constitution of the United States of America specifically states in a number of places that no state or citizen can form another nation without the consent of the Congress, if at all. By concluding that Southern secession was Constitutional, the author loses credibilty. There are other ways to "justify" the secession that led to the Civil War, but the Constitution is not one of them.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
