Title: Rolling Stone is no longer relevant
Product review: Rolling Stone has long been the laughing stock of the music industry when it comes to music reviews. Many classic rock bulletin boards routinely post old Rolling Stone reviews bashing albums that are now considered classics.For instance, it's hilarious to read scathing critiques of big-name artists like Queen and Pink Floyd, nullified by Rolling Stone's glaring errors (saying something like the high point of Pink Floyd's ECHOES compliation is the "entire" 16-minute title track, though it's been edited by 8 minutes). Artists like Vanilla Ice get better reviews, and legends like Emerson, Lake & Palmer are nowhere to be found.More reputable histories of music are available elsewhere for free, and one wonders what Rolling Stone's purpose is in even existing at this point.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
