Title: He was so incorrect at his depiction of the "real" story!
Product review: I read this book as it first hit the shelves. I have read transcripts of this case and totally disagree that Chuck hit the real story. He was not her "crack dealing" boyfriend, he was a young man that was caught in her deceptive web, as so many others were. He was bought by her and became her friend. The sooner Louisianians open their eyes to the corruption of the NOPD, the better off they will be. Until then no one is safe living there. This was a set up at the very least. As I said, I have read the transcripts of both cases and they are full of lies from virtually every witness that testified. Chuck wrote this book based on interviews alone, not the facts.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
