Title: Dated and unconvincing
Product review: This work by Michael Deaver was unimpressive to say the least. After considering the arguments presented I was left with very little understanding of the issues. Only a very basic theoretical framework is provided that offers the reader little to no insight into how to deal with the issue of Iraqi WMDs [that we have since found didnt exist].Furthermore, the author "Michael V. Deaver" has a dull writing style and fails to make any subject he speaks about interesting.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
