Title: fake history and grade b writing
Product review: As with others, I found the lack of research appalling. From Brown's assertions about the council of Nicaea, to his dates for the gnostic gospels, to his factiods about Constantine--this novel is rife with both errors and willful replacement of fact with fantasy.Further, the writing style, grammer and syntax left me feeling like I was reading a high school newspaper.If Brown wants to join the ranks of Umberto Eco, he'll have to work a lot harder the next time around.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
