Title: Good, but these aren't the Catapillar Alaska's they're modelled after
Product review: The boots themselves are not bad, however, when compared to the Caterpillar Alaska FX boots on which they are modelled, the soles are noticeably softer, also the insulation is quite a bit thinner (hence there's more space in the Harley Dipsticks) and the steel cap toe is missing on the Harley Dipstick. Having said that, the Dipsticks are noticeably lighter.These boots, while still adequate, are of significantly lower quality to the original Alaska boots and hence will wear out more quickly. I've used the Alaska's quite heavily for three years and have only just replaced them with these, I expect to replace the Dipsticks within the next year and a half or less.If you're trying to decide between the Harley Dipsticks or the Caterpillar Alaska FX, I would strongly recommend the Alaska FX
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
