Title: not her best
Product review: I was very disappointed in "A Traitor to Memory." I loved EG's previous books, but I thought this one featured very long and long-winded soliloquies from a repellant and boring man who was responding to an old fashioned Freudian psychiatrist. The book is based on the extremely dubious premise that in general people tend to forget very traumatic events, something recently shown to be highly quesitonable, and surely against commonsense also. I should say that I put the book down one-third of the way through; perhaps it got better, but by then I had guessed too much.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
