Title: Case for Christ
Product review: This product is disappointingly biased. The sources provided as support are disappointingly of the same side of the issue and are useful only for making broad general statements that include "all", "every", "completely", etc. The skeptics side is woefully understated and is not truly explored. In short, this is not a scholarly attempt to present a case and pick a winner, but a fixed-fight in which the fixer had already chosen the round for the fight to end, and just needed to get there without making it too obvious.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
