Title: The print equivalent of political fan-fiction
Product review: The Portland Mecury called Sammy's Hill "workshop quality writing," but I'd disagree. It's actually closer in quality to that of really, really bad fan fiction. The story has absolutely no character development, nothing that makes me like the characters, and no compelling plot. All that really happens are a bunch of cringe-inducing "aw, shucks!" moments that make the main character seem like a complete moron, not someone who's worked their way to being domestic policy adviser for a Congressman.How did this book even get published? Talk about nepotism, sheesh!
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
