Title: One of the most poorly composed and edited books I've seen
Product review: This book is a monumental underachievement in its own right. My copy was not only poorly assembled physically, I found the constant typographical errors a distraction. Examples include "her's", "imposter", and "memeograph", to name a few. While many of the types of underachievers are accurately described, the book includes an internal inconsistency of professing that logic will not lead to a resolution of the problem and then sets forth an approach which is, well, logical.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
