Title: Very confusing and very incomplete
Product review: Without question, the two most important texts in the debate over the Calvinism-Arminian controversy are Romans 8 and John 6. While Geisler holds to his 'foreknowledge' view that God foresaw faith in the future of those who would choose Him he fails to make hardly a complete page of comments on John 6. The fact is, John 6 does not support his view. This is a poor book and a book that fails to match the respect Geisler has deserved over the years. His argument against Calvinism and Arminianism leaves him in middle -- a gray area that is very confusing and not well presented.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
