Title: So what!
Product review: Whatever this book is - it isn't ORIGINAL. A.C. repeats a bit of tantrism, a bit of Buddhism, a bit of late 19th Century academic dogma concerning comparative mythology (particularly Egyptian). He gives us a bit of this and a bit of that. And it's all written in the 'Swinburnian' that A.C. was fond of in his Cambridge days. It also has a Freudian feel to it. I don't know who or what Aiwass was, but it seems he or it had a very limited education. Thelemites might try reading some critical biography of Crowley. (p.s. I know exactly what they've said - 'Aiwass told Swinburne and Freud what to write, and he invented tantrism, Buddhism, and Egyptian religion as well.')!
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
