Title: untrustworthy
Product review: The book is full of distorted facts and partial and untruthful analysis. e. g. The author tries to diminish Ilia Chavchavadze's role in Georgian National Identity formation. He writes that during his work as a peace arbitrator and afterwards Chavchvadze's interests turned toward ethnography "Politically he became more conservative and dedicated himself to his work in the Georgian Nobles' Bank and the society for Spread of Literacy Among Georgians". Mr. Suny pays no attention to the 12 volumes of Ilia Chavchavafze's articles published in the period of time, material which is the most important in this aspect.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
