Title: A rather weak presentation.
Product review: I am not a "Oneness Pentecostal." Nonetheless I found Prof. Boyd's book as a work of "scholarship" to be a disappointment. It is rather poorly written and in many of his arguments for the Trinity Prof. Boyd makes use of common fallacies of logic, and his knowledge of biblical Greek is inadequate for the task at hand. His occasional use of 'ad hominem' regarding his opponents (e.g., p. 84 - "cultic reasoning") has no place in a supposed work of objective scholarship. The lack of subject, author and scripture indexes make it inconvenient to use as a reference tool.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
