Title: Objective, useful, academic and dry
Product review: This is a book that thoroughly supports its thesis, even to the point of being dry in some places. But that is necessary to support her arguments. To cover the bases of what she is claiming it requires evidence that she researched the material. She has. Margaret Sanger had a real and dark agenda and Franks is methodical about exposing it.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
