Title: Christian theology bias subverts veracity
Product review: After reading about half of this book the author's blatant pro-Christian bias became so obvious that I could not continue. The continued use of date references using BC/AD instead of the more scholarly BCE/CE notation is a minor detail but is only the beginning. Frequent references to time periods "before the birth of Christ", explications of Christian doctrinal positions to illuminate various events and decisions, and biblical quotes assuming literal truth all provide ample evidence to doubt the objectivity and historical accuracy of this author. This "New History" adds nothing of value to the exciting field analyzing the history of the Roman Empire and its collapse.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
