Title: The man who lost the Russian Revolution...
Product review: When I got my doctorate in history, I ever regretted the historians' tendency to slaughter every man who lost. And yes, the historians kill Kerensky. But the fact is that he lost only because he was never ruthless, like Lenin. He was never murderous, savage, violent. Indeed he was a humanist. The historians say he had "naivete" and so wrote when he died in the early 1970s. But it is far better to be allegedly naive than to be the first of the great mass murderers of the century, like Lenin.Hitler once laughed that if you win, history will endorse you. I wonder if the swine were correct. In truth, history concedes much to Lenin, and nothing to Kerensky. But that tells us more about us than about them....This book rehabilitates Kerensky. It has a dry style but deep research. If there is one better on Kerensky I do not know it.Respectfully,Will Brownell, PhD
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
