Title: Readable?
Product review: Berger is anything but readable. To start with, any given sentence in the book contains anywhere from one to five neologisms the author himself has spawned (most likely in a laughable attempt at clarity). Sentences like "the nominizing act intends a comprehensive order of all items that may be linguistically objectivated, that is, intends a totalizing nomos", is among one of thousands of obscure artifacts of Berger's logic-gears that serve to make this book, in three simple words, *anything* but readable. I award it five stars for containing excellent ideas, and subtract four for managing to render them virtually indecipherable.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
