Title: Major contention debunked
Product review: Everyone's favorite parlor game, what effect did legalized abortion have on demographics, etc., is played at one point in this book. Another famous theory is James Taranto's "Roe effect". The problem with this one is that Steve Sailer did a total debunking of it. I agree with an earlier post; if you find the earlier Slate archives, it appears no evisceration took place, but Slate left off Sailer's final and devastating response; see Sailer's blog. I can't believe the author included this contention in his book, but it's been said he is proud.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
