Title: Bias
Product review: Goldberg, if he ever took a course in logic or evidence, certainly shows no sign of it in this drivel. He takes extremely anecdotal evidence and pretends to extrapolate grand themes from it.The author is apparently as lazy as he is illogical. In some instances, definitive information regarding his assertions is available yet he ignores it, either because of personal dishonesty or because he simply cannot be bothered to research. For example, he chose to assert that bias exists because some of the Senators in the Clinton Impeachment trial were identified as "conservatives" while ignoring the context of the identification, that being a rift between the conservative and moderate elements of the GOP in how to proceed with the trial.The book is filled with such shoddy work.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
