Title: Misleading Title
Product review: I admit that I have not finished the book yet and I may not. I picked this up from the library expecting a book about the founding of the USA with respect to our first three presidents. While that may be in the book, the book is primarily an anti-Bush diatribe. I am not one to defend President Bush but I can not stand intellectual dishonesty. In the book, Vidal states that invading Canada in response to 9/11 made as much sense as invading Afghanistan. While the issue of invading Iraq is and continues to be a controversial one, there has been very little opposition to our invasion of Afghanistan. Our current President Obama has stated many times that our fight against terror was in Afghanistan and not Iraq. For Vidal to state that Afghanistan had as much to do with 9/11 as Canada comes across to me as intellectually dishonest. His hatred of President Bush has made the book almost completely unreadable in my opinion.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
