Title: Dr. Gould as ghostwritten by Morris or Gish
Product review: Along with a number of the other reviewers, I didn't think this was Dr. Gould's best effort. The first commandment of his proferred 'solution' contradicts his solution. His argumentation reminds me of the lines of reasoning of various creationist authors. Leaping to conclusions, talking authoritatively on subjects he admittedly has no experience in, etc. is not Gould's usual style.This book is a selection in the 'Library of Contemporary Thought', but if it's representative of contemporary thought processes how do I get back to the 1800s?
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
