Title: Whimpers in the Darkness
Product review: In comparison with Wambaugh's taut, suspenseful, brilliantly woven account of the Main Line murders, Costopoulos' book (which is bad enough on its own) seems all the worse. Costopoulos is not a good writer by any stretch of the term, and his arrogance and self-absorption certainly do not help his case. Some of the sentences in this book are so poorly crafted you almost shudder in embarrassment. If I had not read "Echoes in the Darkness" already, I would not have been able to follow what happened--this is how poorly and confusingly Costopoulos sets out the facts. The ONLY things this book has going for it are the pictures included of the actual people involved in the saga (sorely missing from Wambaugh's book) and an update on what has happened to some of these people since Wambaugh's book was published.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
