Title: sophistry
Product review: An interesting piece but no more than an apologists attempt to reconcile two fields that have no common ground. Polkinghorne attemts to treat the metaphysical as though it had more substance or basis than the legends, myths and superstitions upon which it is based. The fact that he has some background grounded in science, unfortunately, lends unwarranted credence to his work. At some point the myth followers will have to accept that the universe as revealed by science is not compatible with their myths.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
