Title: Someone Cry for the Children
Product review: I am from Oklahoma and remember when this all happened. The book is written from the standpoint of two detectives who worked the case. The recent DNA findings (2002) didn't mean that Hart was not guilty. They simply could not get enough DNA to process it. The DNA that was collected meant 1 in 7000 chance of an Indian matching that info (Hart did match that one). Whether the book is biased or not it is still very informative.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
