Title: Opinion not based on fact
Product review: Goldberg's book has cause quite a stir. However, the book is little more than a trashing of Dan Rather and a manifesto by an angry ex-employee. If the author wants to examine bias,he should do so in a more systematic, scientific fashion. For example, he could have analyzed news broadcasters use of certain buzzwords or count the number of stories that leaned liberal or leaned conservative. Anyone who wants an unbiased view of this debate should shy away from this rant.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
