Title: Loud and wrong
Product review: One of the CIA's (and the world's) "leading experts on IRAQ", got just about everything wrong in his book. The threatening storm described by the author turned out to be anything but. No weapons of mass destruction, an Iraqi military machine in a total state of disrepair, soldiers with no commitment to a cause, a bankrupt economy incapable of supporting anything but the bare necessities. "Expert", "comprehensive and insightful", "high-quality", "detailed", "professional" analysis which scares the bejeesus out of anyone who reads it. But sadly, more often than not, totally wrong. The CIA's leading expert certainly provides cause to question the intelligence and integrity of that agency.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
