Title: predictable
Product review: I first thought that Lawrence Sanders had one last manuscript in him before his passing - and this was it. Then I read the inside page and found out a Lawrence Sanders "clone" had ghost written this book. This wouldn't have been so terrible (and has been done before) if the publishers hadn't tried to pawn it off as a Sanders book. Obviously greed played a key role here. The book itself wasn't that bad and was written in the same vein as others in the series. I just resent the way it was presented.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
