Title: Turner looses the readers trust from the beginning.
Product review: The methodology used by Turner is to put it mildly, unprofessional. Therefore, he looses credibility from the beginning of the book leaving one questioning throughout: what is fact vs. what is fabrication?Furthermore, he makes huge assumptions and conclusions citing secondary sources of which he displays little if any understanding. Lastly, he misconstrues even a basic understanding of western musical vocabulary: e.g., fugue, polyphony, form, etc.I would not recommend this book other than as an example of bad scholarship.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
