Title: Queestionable - Needs fact checking
Product review: I overlooked the obvious error in his creatively defining "first space" and "second space", then ran smack into the equally creative geographical relocation of Reston, VA.The author (or editor if there was one) needs to do some basic fact checking. It is difficult to take what is supposed to be a factual non-fiction book seriously when obvious, easily verified "facts" are in error. It casts serious doubts on the factuality of the remainder of the story.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
