Title: Transparent conspiracies
Product review: Of course one cannot expect academics to think so far outside the box that a thesis uniting the two concepts they juxtapose, conspiracy and transparency, would have any merit, but that's not saying much. In my book "The Transparent Conspiracy" I suggest precisely this, in reference to 9/11. I would be glad to be proved wrong, to have my theory destroyed not only as unprovable (which it probably is, given the current historical situation), but as illogical, crazy, etc. Until that happens, I have to consider it logical, sane, and the best theory of reality around, since it explains more of the "facts" (read "mysteries, lies and contradictions") than any other.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
