Title: not bad
Product review: Obviously written before the author (and his training) really understood the signifigance aircraft carriers would have in the war between these two countries (1941 -1945), so a lot of his suppositions are not born out by fact.However, the three biggest objections I had to the volume was 1) the fact of his use of very very long paragraphs to get his point across (some paragraphs would go for two or three PAGES at a minimum); 2) the fact that the volume was/is touted as having predicted the attack on Pearl Harbor (at least a decade before it actually happened) but does not mention an attack there at all in the narrative, and 3) how Japan is protrayed as treating prisoners of war in the novel versus how they actuslly treated them in fact.Is it worth reading- - - yes. Just don't do it to see how history was revealed, but only as it might have been.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
