Title: Completely furious and totally disappointed. UGH
Product review: I cannot believe the "universal acclaim" this insipid, unbelievable, uninteresting book on scientific morals and ethics received. Perhaps the publishers had a REALLY swanky "coming out" party for this little number. UGH and double ugh. Obviously it's that or literary judgment has gone by the wayside. I was appalled by the exclamation marks in these paeans of undeserved praise -- since the book is like weak, tepid tea with a bit of mold on the edges. To compare Goodman and this work to Jane Austen is a scandal indeed! The characters are stereotypes of the first water, the events are not believable or so poorly described as to be simply dumb, and the entire production idiotic in the extreme. For SHAME!
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
