Title: Deeply Flawed and Sharply Biased Study
Product review: Muravchik has written an inconsistent and contradictory work that masquerades as a serious study. He reviews the history of the UN's successes and purported failures, along with its well-known organizational inadequacies. He then proposes a preposterous set of "solutions" to the UN's problems. In a section that would be funny if it weren't so dangerous, he proposes the elimination of the UN Security Council and General Assembly. What does he propose to substitute in their place? He states, "The UN would continue as a gathering place for diplomats from all over, a high-level salon." Then, "If nations had issues on which they wished to express themselves, nothing would stop them from calling a meeting of whomever was interested." So much for scholarship the American Enterprise Institute.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
