Title: It's Almost Plagiarism
Product review: I agree with all of the readers who give this book 1 star (or less, if possible). Many have observed that Brown obviously steals from the research of HOLY BLOOD HOLY GRAIL. However, I have yet to see anyone state that the bulk of Brown's sex goddess theology (including gothic arch "vaginas") comes straight off the pages of THE TEMPLAR REVELATION by Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince. Read these two books, and you'll see that Brown's so-called "research" took perhaps all of two weeks to compile. Everything in Da Vinci Code is somewhere in these two books. He is neither original, nor is he a good writer. Baigent, Leigh, Lincoln, Picknett, and Prince, in my opinion, have grounds to bring a plagiarism suit against Brown. I hope they do. I hope they win.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
