Title: Good Album but....
Product review: I heard this when it first came out and liked it because the style of music was unique for its time. Even today, it's great to hear the album. One of the few albums ever made by anyone that I liked every track on. My only question is, what is with the "featuring" Kim Mitchel? Don't get me wrong, he's good, but I've heard a lot of middle of the road singers and guitarists in the U.S. that are just as good, even better. So what was so special about Kim Mitchel that he was "featured" on Max Webster albums. I mean, if he wanted the band to have a fictional name, why put in his own real one? Seems kinda arrogant.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
