Title: Overreaching title; prematurely self-congratulating text.
Product review: If "Darwinism" is the hypothesis that a single reproducing population can branch out into distinct, reproductively isolated populations (species, genus, phylum, and so on) through an evolutionary process driven by natural selection among individually varying members of the original population, then it is very much alive and well. The counter-proposal that design by an intelligent super-being might explain the same physical evidence better is an intriguing one, but it is in its infancy at this point, and it has by no means displaced the natural selection hypothesis in the way that modern medical practices have replaced bloodletting and charmed amulets in the treatment of physical illness. Intelligent Design theorists still have a great deal of work to do, to demonstrate their alternative hypothesis using solid physical evidence.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
