Title: Aptly Titled
Product review: I did not know anything about Tanenbaum using a ghost writer until I read the reviews on this site. I read "Reversible Error" about ten years ago, but nothing else credited to Tanenbaum. I am only halfway through this and scratching my head as to why there is no cohesion to this novel. I don't think I've ever read anything so full of meandering fluff as this book! I gave it two stars only because there have been a few chapters that have held my interest fairly well, although they eventually get lost in the haze that appears to comprise much of this story. It's also loaded with very awkwardly constructed sentences. How did it slip by the editor?
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
