Title: Murr on 'The Da Vinci Code'
Product review: The 'historical research' on which this nonsense is based could have been done by anyone with half an hour to spare and a good internet connection. In spite of the note at the beginning making claims to historical precision, the book is full of descriptive errors and historical inaccuracy. For example, the secret society described in the novel, the Priory of Sion, was in fact a complete hoax which was invented in the late 1950s by the famous confidence trickster Pierre Plantard, and not dating from 1099 as Brown wants us to believe. Don't bother wth this. It truly is rot.[...]
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
