Title: Boring Redefined
Product review: The book as a whole was rather tedious to get through. A lot of characters were introduced quickly near the beginning of the book and were never really developed until later chapters. I felt no connection with any of the characters. The `buddy' aspect of the book suffered considerably because for the first half the book I had little to no clue as to who the characters were.The writing/editing was sloppy in places. The sentence structure was often clumsy. I came across several typo/spelling/syntax errors while reading it. It is apparent there are two different authors involved in the writing as you read it. Sentence structure, tempo and context shifts are apparent between the two.If I were Dan Brown, I would be a little perturbed that someone compared "The Rule of Four" with any of my work.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
