Title: Good information marred by poor execution
Product review: The author of this book has many interesting and helpful points to make, but they are mired down by such statements as "ghost writers pour over research ..." and by inconsistent, often incorrect, punctuation, diction, and spelling. These errors are so prevalent they really get in the way of the useful information she has to share.As a ghostwriter myself, I found Shaw's book to have some nice nuggets. However, mining them was harder than it should have been. A stronger editorial eye would have helped this book. There are even mistakes in the Table of Contents and Acknowledgments. The author is clearly a professional, but this work is so unpolished it is not a good advertisement for her skills.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
