Title: EXCELLENT AND ENTERTAINING!
Product review: Some dislike Hancock's Alamo because it's not John Wayne's version or nit-pick at it for some other reason. The reviewer who states that the set designer of this film "failed to locate the Alamo chapel the proper position to the Convent/Long Barracks building" and claims that this "ruined" the movie really takes the cake. It's a MOVIE! The same critic then asks "What if John Wayne would have had the special effects capabilities this director had?" when it's obvious Wayne's version isn't completely correct either so even with modern special effects the critic would have complained about that version too! I love the Wayne version and it has flaws but does that get in the way of me enjoying it? Hell No! Why be a Scrooge? These are good MOVIES! I enjoyed both versions. Billy Bob and the Duke both deliver and I found both versions to be compelling. Others can nit-pick and complain but I'm looking forward to getting both versions of the Alamo for Christmas.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
