Title: A thought occurs
Product review: The book is from 1946. Not a few social anthropologists and students of the history of thought have said that the book should be understood as a result of WWII and not as independent research. Those guys are supposed to be inspired by Geertz and apply rules for analyzing fiction to studying anthropological monographies. But hey, what do I know.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
