Title: Errors, randomness, inconsistency
Product review: Riddled with many many many many errors (not just types or obvious errors, but errors in proofs and reasoning).The order of the topics is also very poor, as authors often deal with very specific things for a long time (using definitions that really don't make sense unless you compare with general setting) then only get to general setting much later.Too many errors - that says enough.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
