Title: An unintentionally cautionary tale
Product review: This book serves as a horrifying articulate argument against the overuse of psychedelic drugs. The author's indiscriminate use of these agents and his inability to construct a coherent sentence appear, by the book's end, to be causally related. The text conveys nothing so vividly as it does the melting of the writer's own mind, as he downs every indigenous hallucinatory substance he can lay his hands on, coats the page in a nauseously indulgent "philosophizing" that would shame a freshman, and proclaims himself a visionary and enlightened soul. At times his babbling is so unstructured that, were one in the same room with him, the temptation to call a neurologist would be overwhelming.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
