Title: Same thesis, better alternative available
Product review: While Edwards' premises are factual, he does not document them, thus the analysis underlying his positions comes across as 'prideful' (as one reviewer put it). The same thesis is presented with considerably better documentation in Frank Viola's "Pagan Christianity: The Origins of Our Modern Church Practices". I understand that Viola is a friend and compatriot of Gene Edwards; he has done a far better job of making the case, in my view.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
