Title: Good story, very poor authorship
Product review: I have a casual interest in naval history, and regret that I did not know of other books on this typhoon incident before I read Drury and Clavin's version.I agree fully with most of the negative reveiws posted, and will not reiterate their specific complaints.In general, the authors demonstrate considerable ignorance and lack of research into general naval matters, terminology, and technology. In reading the narrative, one is jolted over and over by obvious errors, misuse of technical terms, inconsistencies, unlikely supposition of peoples' feelings and statements, and basic poor writing.Charles Ostrofe
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
