Title: One-sided view
Product review: Writing as Sharon's "media advisor" and defender in the court of public opinion, Uri Dan is attempting to build a strong case for the actions Sharon took when he was a general and was accused of questionable military tactics. What I took away from this book was how unfair the legal system can be. Sharon had a judge blatanly biased in his favor. This is clearly desribed by the personal involvement the judge took on his behalf. He had the highest paid legal talent at his beck-n-call for free. He came across in this description as a mean-spirited "do it my way or else" type person. Reading the book many years after the fact, it appears the very reason he denied pursuing the suit against "Time" magazine was his true intent all along, i.e., to make a name for himself politically.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
