Title: Too difficult a read for an educated non-theologian
Product review: I have a college degree in chemistry so am used to reading fairly difficult technical papers. I found this book almost unreadable. For a non-theologian like myself it required a dictionary at hand to allow me to plow through it. Here is an example: "Fourth, the recognition that there is no universal epistemology, and that our knowledge of entities must conform to their idiosyncratic natures, is an essential realisation in the framing of a just theology." If that is highly meaningful to you, then this is your kind of book.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
