Title: Editor Wanted
Product review: The much ballyhooed y2k disaster never came to pass, but that's not what bothers me about Bob Bridges. Nor does it trouble me that the author is trudging down the same paths that have been well-worn by other authors. I don't really expect original ideas anymore; I'm too old for that. The problem with Bob Bridges is its forced, cheeky style and the use of strange narrative techniques, such as an extended passage written as an interview transcript. What Bob Bridges really needs is not another reviewer, but one editor.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
