Title: Not the Greatest, but Not the Worst
Product review: Like many other reviewers, I went into The Rule of Four expecting it to be similar to Dan Brown's work (which I LOVE!). The authors spent a great deal of time of developing the character's relationships with one another. At times, suspense would be building when they would delve in a character's past, which I didn't enjoy. I must admit I was confused at several points at some of the interpersonal issues they had with one another. I must have missed something earlier. When I finished, my first thought was "That book was confusing." It was good, but not great, and could have been better.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
