Title: The British Monarchy starving Boer children
Product review: British terrorism against Boer civiliansThe book is certainly well written, but it does not provide information on the destruction of the two Boer Republics by means of starving Boer children in concentration camps. It does not say how the British broke their promises in giving the Boer Republics sovereignty by the Sand River Convention. Nor does it comment on how England broke the Hauge Convention by killing Boer livestock, burning Boer homes, and whipping Boer women, children, the sick, disabled and elderly onto soiled trucks meant for animals to the 39 concentration camps in South Africa. The torturous deaths of the children are not even mentioned. Leaving out this destruction of the two Boer Republics is like someone writing about American history of 2001 ago, omitting the destruction of the twin towers.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
