Title: Good Job, Norman
Product review: The nice thing about the book is that it is clear, concise and not strident. Though he goes meticulously through all the details of Dersho's errors and laziness, they are neatly arranged in appendices. The first third of the book reads very well and he has a nice sense of humor as well. I just saw him speak and saw him publically challenged by a "Jewish lawyer" who had sat through "many meetings with Arafat." And he was great. The guy had the usual short-hand excuses for why the book should be dismissed: didn't mention enough of the massacres of Jews and he just slapped a bunch of left-wing reports together and called it a book. He admitted not having read the book and having barely skimmed it during the talk. Norman claims this is typical of mainstream response to his book. Hell of a job, Norman. Lucky we have you in Chicago. (For now.)
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
