Title: Potentially good, if it wasn't so biased.
Product review: Bernard Goldberg had a great opportunity to write an objective book about media bias toward the left. Instead he chose to use this book as a platform for his personal attacks against Dan Rather and other media elites. In the begining of his book, he compares the media to the mafia and complains that he "got whacked." It was difficult to continue the book, but as I plodded through his whine fest, I found that Mr. Goldberg brings up many valid points. Too bad he used a right-wing slant to do so. I for one, like so many people, do not belong to either side of the politics, but prefer information to persuasion.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
