Title: Needs an online list of errata. Unacceptable.
Product review: I am surprised that amidst all the glowing reviews, there is only one reviewer who points out the unacceptable number of errata in this book. A couple of misprints here and there throughout the whole book (or even per chapter) would be acceptable, but I agree with the other reviewer that at times, the misprints are as much as one per page. In addition to the error on page 56 (equation 1.241d should have curl B), here are just a few that I found (I'm just going to list the page numbers): 8, 9, 21, 28, 66, 84, 179, 186, 192, 193, 196, 203, 245, 247, 255.... Look, I could go on and on. But this is not my job. I certainly didn't pay 60+ bucks for this. Physicists deserve better than this. What this book really needs (attention: author or publisher) is an online database of errata. That's the least they could do.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
