Title: Beautifully laid out, but as with with most textbooks it has many preconceived notions that don't give both sides of the argumnt
Product review: Some very interesting pictures and information however when it comes to the detail of authorship of books included in the canon, it's arguments are presumptuous without giving a reasons why some lie on one side of the argument and why some are on the other. Instead it uses words like 'most scholars today agree...' Which is in effect is a false statement. My guess is this book is a textbook for the author and colleagues of like mind that would like to emphasize a way of thinking upon unsuspecting freshmen.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
