Title: Doesn't Regnery Employ Editors?
Product review: Bernard Goldberg has written a bad book about an interesting and important topic. It reads like something that was rushed to print and completely unedited. I agree with his premise that the newsroom has become so insular there's no reason to assume that journalists understand how biased they've become. Unfortunately his hyperbolic style, obvious personal grudges, sloppy writing, and lack of coherent structure weaken his case. The messenger almost killed the message.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
