Title: Ho-hum.
Product review: A collection of anecdotes from science and historydoes NOT make a scientfic analysis of history. I was a bit annoyed bythe manner in which the author generalised the behaviour of unconcious beings and systems as an description of the behaviour of concious individuals (humans). If the book was billed as a catalog of theories and observations (made by others) of nature and history it might be worth something for its reference section (which is gigantic), except there is not much order in the catalog. For a more rational understanding history and humanity, I would read Ayn Rand.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
