Title: No source notes or bibliography--what's with that?
Product review: Much as I admire Judt's writing and breadth of knowledge, I'm appalled that he allowed this book to appear without source notes and bibliography, which are relegated to a website. I imagine this was a compromise he reached with the publisher to enable the publication of an overly long manuscript, but it renders the work largely useless to serious readers.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
