Title: Missed Opportunity
Product review: He'd right. He's wrong. He'd hopelessly muddled. Bernard Goldberg undermines his credentials as a journalist by writing a poorly researched and documented litany of complaints. (My bias: I am member of the media who agrees with his basic premise). He blasts "The Media" for not covering certain stories, and then uses the New York Times and Washtington Post as references for the stories being ignored. He argues blacks have too much influence with the networks and devotes an entire chapter to how blacks have little real representation on network television. It all comes across as rantings from a bitter man who got fired. That is unfortunate. The book is a missed opportunity.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
