Title: Bawer misses the mark
Product review: A trusted minister friend of mine recommended this book as insightful reading material into the success of fundamentalist groups. Bawer's distinction between law and love is interesting and in my experience fairly accurate. However, his constant attacks on all religious groups except for Anglicans proved to be distracting. Perhaps his book should more aptly be entitled: Cafeteria Christians: How religious groups betray Jesus by perverting his words to fit theological constructs.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
