Title: Original is right
Product review: A prior reviewer mentioned that a virtue of this book is its originality. Well, this is half right. It is totally original. But this is hardly a virtue. Someone else has pointed out, and rightly so, that there is nary a fact to be found within. And so we come to what must be acknowledged as quite a feat of "spin" - taking a work that someone made up from whole cloth - a pack of lies, as it were - and casting said effort as worthy of praise for its originality. Well done, apologists. I'm sure there are equally questionable mechanisms to be employed in re-characterizing all manner of horrors, and one presumes that such people as the author will waste no time in getting to the employing. One is tempted to observe that such efforts are an affront to reason and humanity, but one quickly reflects on how such an observation will certainly fall upon deaf ears.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
