Title: Avoids crucial issues
Product review: I have used this commentary in my personal study of the book of Acts. Though Bruce is a good scholar, he does not do a good job here. He avoids the crucial issues that automatically sufaces when one reads the text. Often he just restates what the text has already said. I suppose this shows the difficulty of writing a commentary on a historical book, compared to a "teaching" book. Put your money on Marshalls Tyndale commentary instead. He has a remarkable ability to forecast which questions the reader will have.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
