Title: Book is from Gayendra's Perspective
Product review: The book implicitly seems to think that the son killed their parents over what appears to be a minor disagreement. The only beneficiary was King Gayendra. There is a book on that - Raktakunda.Not sure who is right but assuming that King Gayendra's version as history is ridiculous.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
