Title: Rule of Four = Waste of Time
Product review: I am an avid reader of this genre of books and purchased the book because it was supposed to be a mixture of Scott Fitzgerald, Umberto Eco and Dan Brown (according to the back of the book). It is nothing of the kind. The clues are so far fetched that readers will not figure them out on their own (unless you are a history of art major) and the side stories do nothing but get in the way. I finished the book (because I am not a quitter) but had trouble reading more then a paragraph or so at a time before wanting to fall asleep. If you have insomnia then this book is for you, otherwise stay away.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
