Title: The Rule of Four
Product review: An average first attempt by two recent college graduates. I found one error troubling that the authors should have found in their re-write phase: first, the authors tell us that Paul spent his freshman summer in Italy studying art with a professor and in a later chapter tell us that Paul spent that same freshman summer working the loading docks somewhere near Princeton's campus. Where exactly was Paul that summer? While these two highly eduacated authors tried to impress us with their knowledge of books I was not impressed by such a careless error in editing.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
