Title: Not a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow
Product review: It seems to me that Sue Teele had to search hard for a new spin on the multiple intelligences of learning in order to create "her own" theory. The analogy of learning as compared to rainbows was cumbersome and did not seem to follow a smooth path of thought. If a reader's main desire is to learn about the multiple intelligences, this would not be the best choice in literature. However, on the bright side, Teele includes a chapter with sample lesson plans which incorporate the multiple intelligences.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
