Title: Boring diatribe
Product review: I was a fan of Famous Monsters of Filmland as a kid, and picked up this book hoping for some nostalgic fun and insight into the magazine by the new publisher. It turned out to be nothing but a vindictive rehash of a legal dispute he had with the original editor, Forrest Ackerman. Like listening to a professional victim complain about how unfairly he's been treated, this is a tiresome vanity project, and I found myself skipping through whole paragraphs thinking, "yadda, yadda, yadda."
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
