Title: The worst movie I have ever seen
Product review: An utterly puerile production. I have seen better acting in school plays and primary school plays at that. How could anyone believe that Buck Mulligan was a student ... even a mature student? One reviewer thought Stephen Rea's rendering of Bloom was memorable in its vulnerability - it looked more like stage fright to me.It contains practically nothing of the character of the book, and why start with Molly? or was that just to catch the attention of the prurient.The pace of the film was painfully slow which of course made it impossible to capture the constant turmoil in the minds of the characters.One of the charms of the novel was the change in style from episode to episode in which the film Ulysses (1967) was at least partially successful.Do not waste time with this. Watch the 1967 version.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
