Title: bizarre reading of American history; badly researched.
Product review: It is difficullt to swallow a purported "history" of the American people that extols the virtues of Harding, Coolidge and Nixon as first rate presidents at the same time as it castigates Franklin Delano Roosevelt as a "bad" president. It becomes more difficult when these and other outlandinsh revisonist concepts are offered in the context of a badly researched book. For one who attempts to write a history of the American people to confuse and combine the identities of Confederate Generals Albert Sidney Johnston and Joseph Johnston shows that the author just doesn't have a real grasp of his subject. This is one of several factual errors that are annoying to the knowledgeable reader, an annoyance that is compounded when the book moves into the 20th century and presents a point of view that just doesn't make sense.This book is bad history.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
