Title: Follow where the evidence leads
Product review: This book presents Craig's cogent and compelling arguments for theism. After reading this book, notwithstanding Sinnott-Armstrong's arguments, it becomes difficult to be justified to believe in atheism. (Need I say Anthony Flew's "conversion"?) For this reason, atheists like one reviewer below (Richard Walter Widen) cannot but resort to ad hominem and other fallacies, attacking Craig's method of reading from a prepared text (which is irrelevant to his arguments' validity) rather than refuting his arguments per se. So if you would read this book, first get trained in critical and logical thinking. Then follow where the evidence leads.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
