Title: Was the editor asleep?
Product review: Here's the problem: the book is actually set in two different years at the same time. At one point the book claims to be set in the early 1980s. A hundred pages (and a couple of plot days) later, it claims to be set in 2012. I can believe the former because the book has that cheesy 80s style. 2012: no way. Both at the same time? How could the editor let this kind of mistake through? This completely ruined the book for me.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
