Title: ...and the idea behind this work was...
Product review: anyone? Any clues?To shock people? Well, maybe if it was made in the 60's or 70's...Then the job would be done, but nowadays?Half of this venture could serve as a porn movie. Sex with SM - ticked! Sex with old ugly men - ticked! Sex with a drag-queen - ticked! Sex with an amputee...ticked! And some more. More or less all of them are testeless. Acted really badly.If the director wished to show the world of hustlers, he failed there too. Tony Ward as a single-dad-hustler? Ha ha ha. This 2 minute episode must serve the viewer as a sort of explanation and justification(?) of his deeds. Weak.I would lie if I said I expected a masterpiece when I started to watch it. Bur even then, I ended up being disappointed and puzzled, trying to understand the people who made this amatourish film.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
