Title: Dry lie
Product review: Steadfast in my belief that LHO was 100% innocent, I read the original 1964 edition of this book. It served to further cement my belief that Lee Harvey Oswald did not pull that trigger, and is yet another example of the government making it painfully obvious that their lone gunman theory doesn't hold water and that Oswald was a patsy.While it was interesting to read about exactly how the Warren Commission intended to prove that Oswald was guilty, the book was not presented in an easy-to-read manner, nor did it have any rhyme or reason to it. There is probably a reason for that.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
