Title: For a documentary called "2012: Science or Superstition" It lacked real science.
Product review: The theories put forth by this documentary tended to be badly explained and sources were very rarely stated. Phrases like "I'm sure most scientists would agree" and repeat use of the term "Ancients" in referring to ancient and dead cultures in a spiritual reverent sense hinted extensively at a lack of actual scientific founding. There were a number of different opinions, but I found very few debunking, though the simple thought of "What qualifies the Aztecs and other cultures as having any ability to see into the future? The ability to make a calendar without a telescope?"In short, it was mostly pseudo-science with the gaps filled with logical fallacies spoken with a mystical reverence or outright ignored.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
