Title: Poorly written, error filled, creationism soapbox.
Product review: This story is barely more than a vehicle for peddling creationism. The beginning is promising and you may forgive the odd technical error. But as you get deeper into the story you find the errors mounting and you realize the author is not remotely technically inclined. Readers who like hard science fiction will not like this book. Think of it as a bad James Bond movie but without as complex a plot, not as technically accurate, and not as well written. If the author had left out the dogma and had the story reviewed at least once for errors it could have risen to mediocre. Only those who are deaf to the fingernails-on-a-chalkboard errors or want confirmation of their beliefs will like this story.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
