Title: Uh, Rimshot Below Me...
Product review: Part of being objective IS slamming someone's music when slamming is justified (as on 'Results May Vary'). Telling people who conclude that a rating of 1 star is warranted for this CD that their opinion is not welcome is about as NON-objective as you can get. If you love it: fine; but how about explaining WHY you loved it, instead of getting all defensive (just like the thousands of other people who review their favorite 'artists' whose work has been bashed [Clay Aiken, Britney, et cetera]). Don't you think then you may be able to persuade potential listeners to buy this CD, which you obviously think is a perfect work of art judging by the five-star rating? It is perfect in your opinion... right? Then explain why your opinion differs from all these folks who gave it a one star review. Thank You.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
