Title: Horribly shallow, spoiled by empty rhetoric and generalizations
Product review: Johnson neuters any actual insight he might have effectively instilled in his readers by writing in generalizations. In writing the universal he uses the particular as examples in unfair and inaccurate representations of truth. Moreover, his actual writing is shoddy and employs logic in inappropriate and backwards ways.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
