Title: Poor presentation
Product review: I didn't read "The Da Vinci Code." I was about to when I read the FAQ on the book's website and was appalled by the shallowness of Dan Brown's answers. It was his answer to, "HOW MUCH OF THIS NOVEL IS BASED ON FACT?," which really disappointed me. The bulk of his response was, "The paintings, locations, historical documents, and organizations described in the novel all exist." Thriller or not, this book is passed off as being historically accurate and full of facts (which has been been commented on by numerous reviewers here and elsewhere). I expect a lot more information regarding his sources and research when he has unlimited space on the net (I didn't notice a bibliography in the back of the book either).I would probably enjoy this book as a mystery, but the way he presents this book seems devious and unethical which is why I chose not to read it.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
