Title: Fat, incomplete, inaccurate
Product review: If he had left out the code-word adjectives it wouldn't have been fat, if he had included the Berlin Airlift it would have been more complete, if he had not said that Nixon in 1972 was the "new" American president it would have been more accurate, but corrections like these would be required in virtually every chapter - sometimes every paragraph. Regrettably my local library has this book as it's main reference for the Soviet Union. I would hate to see what local High School students are producing for papers in their AP history classes - I think I might just "lose" the book so that the library can replace it with something better.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
