Title: undergraduate literature
Product review: Erudite? Riveting? Poignant? For whom? Also misled by the Times (why do we continue to listen?), I picked this up to read in the country, when I had unlimited attention to devote to what I hoped would be fun and cerebral, layered and full of arcana. Instead, Rule of Four was boring when it was not pretentious, full of the wisdom of the newly degreed who haven't yet experienced much of life, mystery, work or -- quite clearly -- intimacy.However, the authors are talented and really precocious. I will be interested in seeing their work when they grow up.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
