Title: Why a sequel to such a stupid book?
Product review: I bought the first one -- hated it. Scanned this one in the book store, in the event that it was better. To my amazement, it was just as awful as the first one. I really have to wonder how this editor finds her material. Even writers I have read and enjoyed in other books produce the worst drivel for this one. What gives?
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
