Title: Rule of Four
Product review: I agree with most of the other opinions I have read. It is a great idea for a book, but it is poorly written. The interaction between the two main characters, Paul and Tom, is very stale and their reactions to the events of the book which are pretty life altering events, are emotionless and plain, the authors couldn't have made me care less. The dialog between the college students is not believable in the least, and the narrative as told by the main character, Tom, is awful. The only thing that saves this book is the information on the ancient text Tom and Paul are uncovering, which should intrigue any history buff.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
