Title: Interesting, but flawed
Product review: This book provides an interesting look into the investigation of an unthinkable crime, but it also has mistakes. Some can be attributed to typographical errors, but editing should have picked these up. One discrepancy in particular should have sent alarm bells off in any reader that the manuscript needed more attention because this error has no logical explanation. After finishing this book, I looked up the result of the case--a verdict was reached about six months after its publication--to see if the rush to publish had also colored the facts. It seems that the major mistake was in not taking enough time to ensure quality writing throughout.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
