Title: Since it is irreproducible, it is useless
Product review: The problem with using brain imaging to understand how it works is that currently all the published papers contain irreproducible data. This means that these nice papers show us more noise than real data, and 'contribute' confusion rather than understanding. This book, like the rest of the literature, 'deals' with this problem by simply ignoring it.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
