Title: Abbott and Costello on the Moon giving a bad name to paganism
Product review: I don't understand why anyone would take this novel seriously if they have read the gnostic texts, like the Gospel of Phillip, upon which the novel is supposedly based.As historical fiction, to me it reads as bogus, to draw an analogy, to science fiction where astronauts in the vacuum of space can breathe without space helmets or walk and talk without gravity boots or radios.That's alright for something frivolous--like Abbott and Costello--or if, more subtly, the book were a parody of all conspiracy theories; but so far I'm not sure how the plot holes of this novel can be filled so generously.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
