Title: Guadalupan events: historical evidence
Product review: This is the best book I have read on the Guadalupan subject. Though the author's credo is clear and professed, the text is thoroughly based on documents, which are fairly analysed. They cover particularly the initial period (16th and 17th century), which is often considered lacking of adequate information. Unlike many partisan writings on the subject, the author's documentary work proves sound and reliable and his statements are well supported.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
