Title: I should have read the Publisher's Weekly summary
Product review: I have to say that Publisher's Weekly put it mildly when they called the author's credibility strained by his reliance on anecdotal stories and explanations of telepathy. Let me make this clear, this book is not a reliable resource on autism or any serious aspect of it. It is a collection of superstitious claims used to glorify autism and connect it to a fabricated world. While it may have some use to boost self-esteem of the newly diagnosed, I honestly can't imagine any other reason for a rational person to buy this book.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
