Title: Crash and Burn
Product review: This flick is a waste of time, talent, and money. This is possibly the worst film Sean Connery has ever appeared in. Hammy acting, leaden direction, inept storytellying, etc. It's worst offense is the super cheesy special effects. They don't even pass the mustard with the original "Star Trek" standards. Heck, "Plan 9" had more convincing visuals. Another debit is the depiction of the destruction of the World Trade Center which is of dubious taste in light of the events that followed. This movie doesn't warrant enough camp to meet the "MST2K" criteria.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
