Title: Their worst book yet.
Product review: I read their 2 King Arthur books twice. I therefore consider myself a fan and have great expectations from these writers. Reading "World without end" was one of the worst letdowns I ever had. It seems to me so badly written and on such an amatuer level that I find it unbelievable that it was written by the same authors as "the broken sword" and "forever king". The naive use of elementary school greek mythology, the idiotic difficulties that always arise and are immediately resolved with no sophistication and no mystery. the pseudo psychological and actually hysterial efforts to make destiny and fate the prime movers of puppetlike characters are an insult without end to the intelligent reader. The authors should look deeply into their act and quickly return to their former level. If not, they certainly have lost me.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
