Title: good intentions
Product review: The magazine has good intentions and worthy goals. The photography is awful. The layout, design and printing is so bad as to be distracting. The writing is good for the target audience which would have to be rather good beginning readers because there's scarce little that is attractive to the non-reader (my boys are 3 and 4 so the level of writing in this magazine would need to be read to them). With that said, the writing is neither personal nor authoritative. You get the sense the authors are simplifying or dumbing down a more authoritative source on their subjects than themselves.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
