Title: Inaccurate and Unconvincing
Product review: Kellner puts together a hodgepodge of ideas, most of them correct on their own but entirely wrong when grouped together, and tries to create a new approach. His approach is entirely un-new and internally inconsistent. In trying to combine traditional talmudism and Jewish philosophy with his own brand of pluralism, Kellner ends up with an ill-defined mixture that does not sustain even the most basic analysis. As Dr. David Berger wrote in his review of this book (Tradition, 33:4 1999), "While significant elements of Kellner's argument are convincing, others, I think, are flawed to the point where they render the historical thesis misleading and the contemporary message, for all its good intentions, confusing and unworkable."
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
