Title: Replacing Eurocenturism with the Asian equivelent
Product review: Andre Gunder Frank compells his readers to expand their view of how the West actually rose to the top of the economic world. He makes a nobel effort but, he lacks the evidence to support his often changing thesis. Instead he supplements it with a biased view of history, and challenges experts with lame assumptions. Frank neglectes to recognize key factors in Europes rise, including the industrial revolution. this book should be read with skepticism.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
