Title: Wordy, rambling, hard to follow
Product review: I own but have not read Sex Laws and Cyberspace in its entirety. This is because the book is poorly written and hard to read.The book deals with cogent questions about types of pornography and legal problems in the theory and practice of censoring it.However, it appears Wallace and Mangan aimed at length instead of lucidity in each paragraph and chapter. Reading page after page of their rambling narrative is simply too much.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
