Title: TEDIOUS
Product review: THIS IS NOT GAY FICTION! "Gay" is used here in the context of 1890's "gay". Whoever categorized this work should be shot.I read the first chapter thinking he'll meet a guy on the next page, or the next page. Unh uh. Not in this work. Then I started skimming. You can get most of story by just reading the quoted dialogue. The author does a nice job of portraying the moral/social dilemmas and manners of late nineteenth century London society but unless you are fond of tedious lengthy internal monologues about a gentleman's moral standing when he finds himself thinking of holding a ladies hand (lot of thinking about doing and very little doing in this work) then I do not recommend this work.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
