Title: Sadly misrepresents Calvinism
Product review: I had read Geisler on apologetics and appreciated the work (even though I didn't agree with every point). But I could not appreciate this book at all because it completely misrepresents Calvinism and then attacks the misreprententation. If you want to argue for Armninianism, which is exactly what Geisler does (always claiming he isn't), then one should at least be honest about your opponent and about your position. A book on this subject should deal at length with Romans 9 directly as well.Get another book, this one will "win" the argument simply through misrepresenting everything!
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
