Title: Little science, lots of conjecture
Product review: My biggest disappointment with this book is that it is represented as "a good walk through the science of golf". The author is very comfortable citing other works but gives no data to support his own conclusions. He statement that the hands should be substantially ahead at impact is not supported at all. Don't mind that he has an opinion but if he states it as fact he should be able to back it up.There are many other books for me to spend my money on, wish I had done so in this case.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
