Title: polemically one sided approach to science.
Product review: While I myself had not actually read the book, the problems I see with this work is tautologically apparent. PIAS works on an objective, logical truth that far exceeds mankinds framed reference of what can be epistemically available. Recent works have started to combine the gap between current science, and the emerging postmodernist methodologies to create a holistically balanced approach (I refer the reader to Sokal 1996). Our job as subjective viewers is to wait in the sidelines until the field codifies itself, but until then, reserve judgement.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
