Title: Dated, biased, and stereotyped
Product review: Since the book was written in 1930, I guess I shouldn't be surprised at the stereotypes and inaccurate statements. Her views and statements about witches, psychic vampires, and magic come from a detached viewpoint, not from someone with an understanding of this phenonmenon. I put it down after the first few chapters, when I found a third series of stereotypical statements with no basis in fact. If you want more updated and accurate information on magic, or psychic protection, look elsewhere.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
