Title: The Da Vinci Disaster
Product review: Interesting for the first 100 pages. After that, the plot quickly loses steam. I expected more theory and research, much in the way Graham Hancock writes in "Fingerprints of the Gods," or "The sign and the Sea."Here, there were absolutely no references to where Brown received his information. His theory is interesting, yet is merely an opinion. THe book contains interesting "side-notes" of academic worth, but even these are not sufficient to salvage the disaster that is the main plot.Though provoking, yet highly disappointing.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
