Title: A CASE FOR DECEPTION
Product review: The one thing that I noticed early in Mr. Strobel's book was his less than honest statements about being unbias. He even goes to extremes as to say he is going to play "the skeptic". After this the first thing he does is surround himself with friends with the same or simular theological views. Then there's the disturbing fact that he doesn't interview one scientist with an opposing view. When dealing with the evidence that the earth is over 4 billion years old, he forgets his role as skeptic and simply says that the "when" is not as important as the "how". All this alone is enough to show what a farce Strobels's book really is. This book also reminds me of I DON'T HAVE ENOUGH FAIT TO BE AN ATHEIST by Norman Geisler. Both play on the general public's ignorance of science to peddle their pseudo pyscho babble.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
