Title: Made-up pseudoscience.
Product review: In this short volume (110 pages, the rest is glossaries and descriptions of other LRH books), Hubbard describes how he allegedly discovered the reactive mind and the engrams that cause all sorts of "aberrations". He mentions lots of experiments that were allegedly made and claims that Dianetics has been shown to work in every single case. But he provides no evidence, so despite his claims that Dianetics is a science, there's no way for the reader to verify any of his claims, only take his word for it. There have been no independent studies that have shown Dianetis to have any merits at all. This book is recommended only to those who want to understand what Dianetics is all about without having to read the much longerDianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
