Title: read instead the &#65533;Autobiography of G. K. Chesterton&#65533;
Product review: There's no new ground covered here, which is a major flaw for a work by an "historian; moreover, the author's writing style is hackneyed, and that's in its most readable passages. Also, Chesterton was an Orthodox Catholic, where the author of this work is not - their perspectives are at polar ends. Chesterton probably would have been appalled to have such an adversary of the Church to be so bold as to write about his life.If you want to know Chesterton read his "Autobiography of G. K. Chesterton".
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
