Title: Doesn't even meet tabloid journalism standards.
Product review: The author collected materials from other biographies, and then added every sexual allegation he could find, from whatever the source. He even repeats stories which he must know are untrue. For example, the trooper who told the story of Clinton having sex on a surveillance camera recanted two years ago, but the story is printed as fact. Andersen seldom mentions problems with his sources' credibility. Too bad Clinton can't sue him.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
