Title: Zero tolerance dictates you shouldn't tolerate this book
Product review: Reviewing "Eats, Shoots, & Leaves" in The New Yorker, one of the world's most carefully edited literary magazines, Louis Menand notes that the first punctuation error in this book "appears in the dedication, where a nonrestrictive clause is not preceded by a comma. It is a wild ride downhill from there." The rest of Menand's article proceeds to tear Lynee Truss a new one, pointing out dozens of unforgivable grammar mistakes. To top it all off, Gotham Books chose not to make any changes to the American edition of this British book. We all know that British English is a horse of a different colour and follows slightly different "rules". It sure takes guts for a book like this to advocate the intolerance of grammar gaffes.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
