Title: Nothing New
Product review: It is obvious in the first three chapters of this book that there is no original research here. It is simply a matter of going to the library and regurgitating what was already written in secondary sources. Other author's conjectures about the Revolutionary war spying story are simply repeated here, so accurately that one can tell which books they are taken from. It would be permissible to copy the historical fact, but when the old myths and conjecture of past researchers are repeated here as well, along with the fact, that is unacceptable.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
