Title: Belongs Listed as Fiction
Product review: While this book alleges to be a thorough examination of the circumstances surrounding the assassination of JFK, what it actually is, is a prosecutor's brief. Virtually every one of the "conclusions" stated within it's pages are not only in dispute, but some are based on outright falsehoods invented out of whole cloth. The reader should be aware that it is nothing more than a theory and contains things listed as facts that have never been proven. I recommend that if you choose to read this at all, you should also read the critiques of this work of fiction, which should include the "Whitewash" series of books by Harold Weisberg as well as "Rush to Judgement" and "PLausible Denial", both by Mark Lane. Anyone that claims that this is a definitve examination of the assassination needs some serious therapy.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
