Title: Sensationalistic "journalism" at its worst.
Product review: One of the worst thought out books I ever read. Makes excessive use of case study, focussing on the story of a single individual, without attempting to dig into the more general experience of the population. It's section on the deregulation of the airlines was especially dishonest, as it examined one route where prices went up, without ever refuting or even discussing the broad evidence (that now should be apparent to everyone) that ticket prices fell with deregulation. This is classic doomster writing, and an excellent case in point for the position that economics should be left up to economists.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
