Title: Factually flawed
Product review: The book reads well enough but it is so factually flawed that the Washington Post has started a "Gail's Goofs" column about this particular book listing all of the factual errors (six days running last I checked). Read Lloyd Grove's Reliable Source column in the Washington Post Style Section before you buy this book.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
