Title: Elitist and Foolish Book...
Product review: The only merit of this otherwise elitist and foolish book is that one can learn how *trial* lawyers can distort issues beyond all recognition ("above the law") and how they employ such tactics as grossly inappropriate analogies (Hitler for the Suprem Court), (weak) strawman counterarguments, non sequiturs (e.g. Soldier's and Sailor's Civil Relief Act of 1940 and the President's responsibilities), and so on, and how they can represent themselves as something they are not (neutral, non-partisan). One can also see that it is possible to expand a one-paragraph argument into a book --- although this is admittedly a lousy example.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
