Title: Frustrating reading
Product review: Books by apologists frustrate me because as I read, counter-arguments enter my head and the authors just ignore them! I could barely get through Lee Strobel's "The Case for Christ" because of his infuriating tendency to pretend he was getting at all the facts. He claimed he was being impartial but he never challenged the "experts" he questioned; he just accepted all they had to say. Is this the new journalism?Anyone honestly interested in the truth won't read apologists' books without also searching for skeptical rebuttal. Lucky for us, Earl Doherty's "Challenging the Verdict" is a comprehensive response to Strobel's book highlighting all the arguments Strobel conveniently left out or glossed over.Don't read one without reading the other!
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
