Title: Interesting
Product review: I got this abridged audio CD from the library. I found the book interesting and enlightening. It covers topics from the history of the constitution, musings on certain supreme court Justices including Thurgood Marshall, a brief history of the women's rights movement, and problems with the law today and jury issues. Sandra read the book herself on the CD, an her voice sounds friendly but crackles a bit with age. It inspired me to want to serve on a jury someday, though with trepidation. I don't feel like I was missing much by listening to the abridged version. Of course, if you want real depth on one of the topics she discusses, look for another book. This just covers the topics, and makes everyone feel good. There is not much she says that you can argue with. I kept wondering if she wrote this to ameliorate the population ruffled at the Supreme Court's arbitrary handling of the Florida recount upset in 2000.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
