Title: Crawford needs an editor
Product review: I have recommended "Empire of Time" to my sci-fi friends. It has a few inconsistencies (When exactly did Ishigawa die - different parts of the book mention he died at different events). However, overall "Empire of Time" is bursting with energy, great ideas, and leaves you wanting more."Fall of the Republic" is basically a poor book. It was published in 1998 and clearly suffers from the lack of an editor. The pace of the book is plodding and the quality of writing is substandard.If Crawford finds a good editor who is willing to be critical, this book could be great in a revision. Right now it feels like a first draft and an embarrassment to "Empire of Time."
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
