Title: Ivy League slop
Product review: In the Rule of Four, the authors quote that "there's no worse thief than a bad book". How ironic, as this is possibly one of the most poorly written books I have read. The writing is overblown as if the authors are doing their darndest to impress you with how smart they are. Perhaps they realized that if you are confused by the awkward sentences and chronology, then you might not notice how lame the very frequent digressions are.I wonder if the Ivy does take out?
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
