Title: water witches review
Product review: This story suffered from poor writing. The author broke the cardinal rule of "don't tell, show". Again and again instead of showing us the story, the author told us the story. Another issue was that there seemed to be three, possibly four stories, within this book with only a minimal connection to each other. The second half of the book had little connection to most things that had happened in the first half of the book. The change brought upon the central character seems unsupported in that we didn't fully understand why he was the way he was before or after the change. The central character seems to be nearly devoid of emotions throughout the entire book so it is hard to care what happens to him. Buried somewhere in here is possibly a good tale. However, a different storyteller would need to present it in order for us to care about this tale.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
