Title: Prolonged
Product review: I read this book because it was compared to the DaVinci Code. Sorry, very far from it. They are alike only because both are about hidden codes in old books--that's as far as the comparison can be made. From the beginning I found it just rambled on with pointless dialogue. Character development was sketchy and at times confusing. Although, it was branded as a mystery novel, The Rule of Four read more like a tour of the grounds and traditions of Princeton. I just finished reading it because I paid for it and hoped it would get better... which it didn't.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
