Title: Get Thee to an Editor
Product review: Poorly researched, poorly structured and poorly edited. Follett now suffers from Michener's Syndrome, where a pop novelist grows too powerful for an editor to do his or her job. As a historian, I was disturbed by the inaccuracies. As writer, I was disturbed by the weak and inconsistent internal structure and predictability. God forbid anyone views the history as accurate. This could have been three hundred pages shorter, and much better. It also seemed to be a direct rip off of Ellis Peters (A welsh monk during the civil war between Maud and Stephen? Been there, done that) Read Name of the Rose or, better yet, a real history book. Plenty of those in the library.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
