Title: So-called "research?"
Product review: It is immediately obvious that the author is guilty of the very same desire to prove a pre-conceived notion, that he accuses Yigal Yadin of. Except that his "refutations" are weak, contrived, and based on things that include, the precise wording or emphasis used by newspaper reporters in reporting on the excavations. The author repeatedly points to differences in the initial description of certain archaeological finds, and later descriptions of those same relics. Yadin's descriptions are less certain earlier and more certain after further digging and research. Is this not what you would expect from a careful researcher?You'll learn nothing about the archaeology of Masada from this book.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
