Title: Misses the Mark
Product review: Although Rule of Four left the gate at a relatively brisk pace, the it quickly became bogged down. Character development was sketchy and not helped by rambling and often pointless dialogue. Flashbacks came out of nowhere as did sub-plots. Branded as a mystery novel, The Rule of Four read more like a historical tour of the grounds and traditions of Princeton. Found myself all too often having to back up to see what I missed. Comparisons of this work to the DaVinci Code do not exist with the exception of the search for messages hidden in archaic documents.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
