Title: Entertaining tale; inaccurate background research
Product review: This is an entertaining tale, but to call it a historical novel is an egregious misnomer. His representation of historical "facts" pertaining to the Knights Templar and the allusions to the Rosecrucians are inaccurate at best, and irresponsible in any event. Cutting to the chase, everything else not withstanding, even if Jesus and Mary Magdalene had married and produced a "royal bloodlike," the Passion, Crucifixion, and Resurrection still stand on their own right. In other words, "What difference does could of this make in relation to one's faith and one's perception of Christianity?" The only difference is much padding to Mr. Brown's bank account. Greed, irresponsibility, and poor research in the guise of "Controversial Best Seller."
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
