Title: shakespearian english, simplistic analysis
Product review: The book is written in Shakespearian English, but the analysis is rather simplistic. The author is really an outsider to the conflict, he makes his own hypothesis from afar away. The analysis is too descriptive, and very repetitive. The author seeks to show that he is the 'the Western leading expert' making the analysis with no policy implications. You may read the book as it has some historical background, but for a successful analysis of Algeria you'd need to look elsewhere. The book really doesnt do it.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
