Title: Can only comment on the first third of the book...
Product review: To my mind, the author was trying to prove two things:a) that he is smarter than Kurt Godel, and anyone else who has thought about the problem, andb) that the correct answer to Platonism vs Fictionalism is "who knows or cares?"I was unconvinced by the former and underwhelmed by the latter. On internalising the latter, I was unable to finish the book. Perhaps the rest is better, or perhaps I was expecting something else. Or perhaps, being not even as smart as Godel, I am just not clever enough. Who knows, who cares?
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
