Title: Useful reference but only good through 1996
Product review: This was a handy resource to corporate greening up to 1996 when it was published. I still find it useful as a reference but obviously it needs a successor, now that we're in corporate greening 2.0 where climate change has fused "green" with "energy" and "sustainability." It's worth having on the shelf in company libraries, but where it stops, readers will have to go to the Web
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
