Title: Comments by Anthony S. Pignataro
Product review: 'Finally, fans will have an opportunity to winnow sensationalized fact from tabloidesque fiction. A pending motion portends the upcoming trial. For the very first time, Ms. Rule's claims of thorough research will be put to the test. As the doctor prepares-for the first time- to go to trial, the facts will be tried in a case where the protagonist lives. In an ironic twist of fate, a Constitutional court error will allow the doctor to go back to trial. T his really puts the double in the entendre: correcting'A-Bad-Rule"
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
