Title: Poor research or maybe questionable motives
Product review: The author seems to ignore some basic facts that any amateur researcher could easily discover. The most improtant being this: Gotch did works! He did them often. Wrestling was almost as worked then as it is now. Read the newspapers from that time for yourself and don't rely on the author. The reporters covering wrestling back then were in a position to know what was legit and what wasn't.Chapman seems to have some agenda built around creating a mythology of legitimate professional wrestling from a bygone era. Unfortunately, he has resorted to stretching the truth, and that's putting it kindly.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
