Title: Dreadful
Product review: This book did have technically accurate and well-crafted cross-examination scenes.However, the characters were cardboard caricatures. Psychological changes came about in ways that were too abrupt to be believed. The lawyers, without revealing any plot twists, behaved in ways that no ethical lawyer _could_. The computer comments were laughably inaccurate at times (a small gray box described as a "Norton Utility" with a straight face). It's hard to believe that the author is really a lawyer, unless someone else wrote everything but the courtroom scenes. Even the scenes in chambers with the judge didn't ring true. This book mostly reads like a layperson's dream of what being a big-time criminal defense lawyer would be like.You would be better off reading a Scott Turow novel if you are looking for a legal thriller, or even a John Grisham one.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
