Title: pseudo-science
Product review: These essays are pop psychology at its worst. Most of the authors simply generalize at tiresome length about diagnostic categories and criteria which don't have any scientific or medical justification. The editing is particularly sloppy. The essays are inconsistent. Some of them are wordy beyond belief. All of them are self congratulatory collections of assertions.I could not help the sense that these essays are all calling cards trying to drum up business for Jungist analysts and therapists.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
