Title: Valid points in the form of concieted verbiage
Product review: Bruner raises some interesting points and rather validly questions some of the developments in psychology and the search for meaning. However, his points, which are delightfully simple, are somehow lost in a sea of convoluted sentences and meaningless words. His examples makes this book only accessable to the trained gurus. It could have been a great commentary, but I ended up so frustrated sometimes that I would lose track of what Bruner was arguing.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
