Title: For believers only
Product review: I saw this book at the library so I checked it out. I think it's good for people to read a book like this because it shows how strong/weak the case for a creator is. There really isn't any evidence. There are faults with aspects of evolutionary theory but nothing to support the idea of 'intelligent design'. A reader has to have a pretty strong desire to believe to take these faulty arguments seriously. How can you reconcile such poor reasoning ability with 'intelligent design'?
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
