Title: One sided, poorly written
Product review: This journalist apparently has only one formula for writing. And that formula doesn't work in book form. Do I care what the experts' offices and clothes look like? Do I care about his every thought as the interviews progressed. This timeline approach to his research was clunky and boring.Beyond the inappropriate yet easily skippable writing style, he does pose some good questions and covered some interesting topics. The debate is engaging, but this book is one sided and despite the title, this is NOT written by an idependent thinker on the topic. The book leaves all counter arguments to Strobel who simply isn't up to the task of debating the heavy theologic thinkers.Instead of "Judge" Stroble falls into a bit of the bumbling prosecuter on his thesis that the New Testament is factually accurate beyond a reasonable doubt. Unfortunately this case comes without a proper defense.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
