Title: no
Product review: As noted elsewhere, hyperbolic language is a not a mark of intellectual honesty. "Convincing evidence" is presented many times, and, once, "convincing historical evidence". The accomplishments, citations, and titles of interviewees are listed exhaustively. Over-the-top descriptions are seeded throughout the book.Strobel does bring to light complex theories and offers some of their history, though slanted to Intelligent Design. No book featuring science can be all bad.A created universe provides moral structure, according to Strobel. The idea of random evolution does not. Whatever.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
