Title: Horrible 'objective' research
Product review: He only interviews believers, he barely puts up fights against outrageous claims, and accepts historical examples as reason to believe in the Christian doctrine.The book even says religion can't be accepted from facts, only from faith (aka blind acceptance) of a holy book. So why did he spend a whole book trying to prove it when he says himself that it can't be proven? Because this book is made for people on the fence of faith to push them over to the Christian side, it's not written to inform a reader about historical events during the first century. It's an absolutely horrible book.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
