Title: Truth according to Goltz
Product review: It is known that no war is just, for every party that is at war thinks that its truth is the only credible one. To put the blame on on of the sides is morally wrong, and the author takes precisely such a wrong position. War crimes have marked the history of the Karabakh conflict, both Azeris and Armenians have commited atrocities. What we desperately need is an objective analysis that would portray Karabakh conflict for what it is. For an American to take a pro-Azeri position means to miss the chance for an objective look at the situation. This book leaves much more to be desired, although one cannot take away the well-written form in which material is presented.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
