Title: Plan to spend a lot of time looking at other references.
Product review: a = b, c, and d.e = f, g, and h.b > e while a < f.ac < gh while fh < bd.c can be diagrammed in this box if you use h.g is shown in this truth table if you use a.Part of what makes this text so difficult to understand is the author's inability to use consistent terms while trying to explain material. In the first chapter, a simple And gate is referred to as 'AND', 'x^y', 'x.y', 'xy', '()()', and 'and'. All true, but used interchangeably while trying to explain makes the concepts incredibly difficult to decipher, particularly when variations for representing other boolean concepts are added to the fray.The best part of the book, as far as I can tell, is that the key terms are in bold so I know what to plug into Google to try and figure out what it is.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
