Title: One Very Trite Book.
Product review: Famous American "star" journalists are well known for their bland, conformist mindsets, and their bad writing. This book is just another badly written and incredibly trite "travel diary". Much of the book has Salisbury anachronistically hyping his own career, but even the accounts of 1989 fail as a human interest story. As history or journalism, the book is useless, as it gives no background or context, and darn little content.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
