Title: Hmmmm...
Product review: The best way to read this book is to ponder what the American people should know about their politicians before they elect them to the highest offices. Those who dismiss this book as rumor overlook the extent to which so much which had been dismissed was corroborated over the past year.Would Clinton have been elected if Anderson had written this book in 1992? My suggestion, the answer is clearly no. To what extent should the press vette candidates before they're elected? If the New York Times had published this material before the New Hampshire primaries they would have been accused of attack dog politics, and yet better that than what the country went through last year.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
