Title: terrible, corrupted retelling of Mohammed and Earyl Islam
Product review: Karen Armstrong's book on Mohammed is a very liberal retelling of Mohammed's life that reads more like bad polemics than history. The book is also filled with errors. I am a religion studies major, have read this book for a class on Islam and having taken a class solely about Mohammed and this book was much different. She takes form the stories of Mohammed and mixes tries to soften them and represent them in order to attract a modern western audiance.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
