Title: Marks the culmination of Posner's philosophy
Product review: Posner has been leading up to this book for a long time. He attacks moral philosophy as being irrelevant for helping make important legal or any other kind of decision. Instead he advocates a pragmatic, empirical approach. To paraphrase Jeffrey Rosen of the New Republic, if we lived in a sane society, the Senate would beg Posner to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, for our society, Posner has not only left a long paper trail, but a paper super highway.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
