Title: Holden Caulfield Goes to Princeton
Product review: That should have been the title of this collection of college student angst. I fell for the publication hype, and knew I had made a mistake after 20 pages. This book bears no resemblence to "The Divinci Code" in either story line or character development. Besides telling me more about Princeton than I would ever want to know, the authors (in their obvious arrogance for their alma mater)allow this sideshow to interfere with the pace of the story. Finally, they cop out on the one interesting part of the story, the quest to uncover the secret of the book. The book jacket says they started writing "The Rule of Four" in 1998. Their effort did not age well like a fine wine.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
