Title: ID Not Science
Product review: I'm sorry to break it to you guys, but anyone who thinks that this book is a sucessful exercise in expressing the intelligent design theory in scientific terms has been woefully mislead. Dembski uses scientific terms to ATTEMPT to explain the creationist point of view, but intelligent design is simply NOT SCIENCE. This is not a matter for discussion, any more than one could discuss using mathematics to define religion. The two fields simply do not work together. If you don't believe me, then you haven't read enough about science to really understand what it is.In terms of philosphy and science, ID has been shown to be fallacious, and since Dembski clearly has a religious agenda (i.e. Christian agenda), he should not be allowed to call ID any kind of science, and you people should certaintly not believe him when he says that it is.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
