Title: Does God need a "case"?
Product review: I read this book out of mere curiosity. It was given to me by a friend. My first of many complaints for this book is in the title itself. It should be titled, "The Case for Jesus as the Christ." The name "Christ" is merely a title representing the person it is bestowed upon. After that, the book just gets worse. This is hardly the work of exhaustive journalism, a handful of biased and shallow interviews. However, the most annoying aspect of this book, and others like it -- even M. Martin's counterpart --- is Strobels sense that this "case" is needed, or essential to the promulgation of his new found faith. Since when did Jesus, the Christ, God incarnate, need our evidence to prove or justify him anyway?
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
