Title: A terrible third book to an otherwise solid trilogy
Product review: Hobb fails to deliver in the third book of the trilogy. The protagonist, FitzChivalry, does not have a direct confrontation with the story's antagonists. The reasoning behind the forging of the kingdom's inhabitants is explained away in roughly a page and a half. By the first third of the book, I realized Hobb would be unable to reasonably resolve all of the conflicts in the story. Very disappointing and very sloppy. I doubt that I will attempt any of her other books.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
