Title: Doesn't cut it.
Product review: While it proved to be a quite interesting read, the book lacks any substantial proof of the author's claims. You are basically expected to take the footnotes and research the information yourself to form an opinion of the book's validity. What the author obviously fails to realize, is that many who wanted to buy this book had no "in depth" knowledge of the events surrounding that fateful November night and were looking for proven answers in this book (That it's previews claimed existed herein). I for one was sadly disappointed by the lack of any substantiated proof, but I must admit, the story the author told was quite interesting, even if unfounded.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
