Title: Boring and pedantic
Product review: Indiana, while endeavoring to add to the (unfortunate) trend in legal thrillers, is anything but. The is no Grisham - the prose here is stilted, the characters are leaden. The work wanders from one topic to the next, as if written by committee. Readers on the look out for well-written legal procedure are best served by sticking to the tried and true - Miller on Federal Practice and Procedure would be a good place to start.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
