Title: Christopher Andersen's Bill and Hillary: THE FLOP
Product review: What an utter disappointment. That sums it up. Anderson makes wild outrageous claims and then has the nerve not to name the source of his claims. He writes that Governor Clinton, while attending an engagement party seduced the bride in front of her fiance, broke up the engagement and then made her believe he was going to marry her and divorce Hillary. According to whom? Andersen claims that two weeks after the impeachment trial, Clinton had a secret service agent approach a young woman and ask her back to his room for a drink, again who is the source. ANDERSEN CANNOT EVEN GET THE NAME OF THE FAMOUS INTERN CORRECT - IT'S NOT LEWINKSY BUT LEWINSKY! I once had a journalism professor tell me that if you are not correct on the little things people will not believe you on the big things. I think this is a perfect example. If we accept this book, we lower the bar on what we expect from journalists.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
