Title: Readable and rewarding
Product review: Just worked through this with my brother, and we thought it was terrific. I'd read much of Nichomachean ethics before, but that now seems superficial compared to reading it with AQ as a guide. Besides AQ's insights into the Ethics's interactions with Aristotle's other works, AQ's extremely detailed break-down of the structure of each argument -- which we'd initially found a cross between tedious and hilarious -- in the end was a great guide to Aristotle's thought *process*. So you'll enjoy it after the first dozen or so times you read, "This argument has three subarguments. The first subargument is broken into four parts. The first part has a two-fold structure...."
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
