Title: Dry, crunchy, stale
Product review: During the course of the reading of this book, I found that no amount of knowledge is worth the effort of trudging through such monotonous, grey-scaled descriptions of occurences. Unfortunately, that is all there truly is to describe, as it functions merely as a chronology, never delves into the background of any event. Sentence structure is rote and repetative. Opportunities to delve into the more interesting aspects are consistently ignored, and the reader is left wondering whether anything at all truly had a cause. In short, a stereotypical bad history book that avoids all semblance of attention-holding structure. If you are planning to actually spend money on this book, do not. It's not worth the fifty cents I paid at the library to get a card to borrow it.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
