Title: misinformation in print
Product review: This is a terrible book. It is sloppy; for example the Italian nobelist Segre becomes Segra; the authors claim to be experts on uranium separation but in attempting to describe the operation of a calutron they actually describe a centrifuge. The worst offense, however is the intellectually dishonest intermingling of historical facts and pure conjecture on the part of the writers without giving the reader any way of knowing what is what. An obvious example is the statement that Clinton bombed iraq to draw attention away from the Monika Lewinsky scandal. Certainly he did order the bombing; but why he did so neither the authors nor anyone outside that administration know. The mouthing of extremist propaganda is no substitute for good journalism. Unfortunately this level of reporting is repeated over and over again in this volume.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
