Title: bad remaster great show
Product review: There is no discussion about how great these shows were. I was lucky enough to experience them on tv in 1964. The 2003 edition was wonderful. When the studio that remastered these dvds said that they were going toclean up the film "frame by frame", I was expecting a significant improvement. When I compared each show to the 2003 dvd, the 2nd show seemed brighter, but there was no improved video or sound definition. The other3 shows were inferior in clarity. How can these people take a step backwards in quality, and sell the product as being remastered? For the best product, seek the 2003 version. Note, the bonus material is worthless.A more appropriate bonus might have been to include the beatles' rehearsal songs which you can see on you tube for the 1964 performances.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
