Title: Not worth your time
Product review: The style of his writing was positively annoying, but I could get past that. There seemed to be nothing substantial for the first... half(?) of the book. Thereafter, however, the annoying style was eclipsed by illogical arguments. You'll have to read it yourself if you want actual details of what I'm talking about, but the author misrepresented persons he quoted, he committed strawman and hasty generalization fallacies, he drove a hard line between worship and life (when our lives are supposed to be worship), he drew false conclusions based on unsupported premises, and in all honesty, I despised reading the book. Here's the sad thing: I agree with his major point, the modern church is sacrificing truth for entertainment. I could not, however, disagree more with the way he exposited that point.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
