Title: Tedious
Product review: I have not read Prague, and perhaps I should because I disliked the Egyptologist as much as the previous reviewer disliked Prague. The Egyptologist actually begins with an intriguing premise; the two diarists with histories that converge has potential. Unfortunately, the author drags out the story as Trilipush descends into complete insanity. The "surprise" ending is obvious about a third of the way through the book, but I couldn't believe it could be that transparent and trudged through to the end just because I was convinced there had to be something else. But no. I can't believe this book would have been published if not for the success of Prague. I'm reasonably certain the author had to be high to continue ad infinitum in his tedious vein with little variation in pace or plot.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
