Title: That's all the evidence?
Product review: This book is portrayed as asking all the hard questions an atheist would bring to Christian scholars. But Lee Strobel's heavy bias in this book makes me doubt his proficiency as a skeptic. He admits to being a committed Christian for years when he wrote this book and therefore fails to bring any objectivity to his subject. I also think a simple presentation of his evidence would have been more readable than the rather elaborate investigative journey plot.Although portrayed as a persuasive argument for unbelievers, I felt this book was written for:Christians; to help bolster any wavering faith in this age of apostasy.Fence sitters; because "your future and eternity hinge on how you respond to Christ." p.271I felt Strobel failed in his attempt to provide reasonable evidence for Christ. And he resorts toward the end of the book to thinly veiled scare-them-into-heaven tactics.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
