Title: Lacking
Product review: I'll make this short. I've been playing poker for about nine years now and I know a good poker book when I see one. This is not one of those books. Phil probably wrote the book to market his ego and not his knowledge. He saw other greats defining themselves in the literature realm and decided he was going to do the same. His book lacks proper play with a lot of garbage telling you, "dont play it this way unless your really good." If I wanted that advice, I would have read a book written by dead money. I expected more, and got less. He rants about playing styles and how great his moves were in the past. Great Phil....good for you, Chan is still better than you.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
