Title: omissions undermine credibility and usefulness
Product review: SF readers grew up on, and invariably cherish, the writers included. However, The book appears to omit Heinlein, Bester, Leiber, and Asimov, to mention only a few, and to greatly under-represent Mr Clarke. Perhaps it should be re-named "The Oxford Book of British Science Fiction". The book is needlessly chauvinistic; especially since the genre was brought to full maturity in the 20th century by American writers. A new, appropriately inclusive edition would be wonderful. One fails to underderstand Oxford's relentless and needless British bent.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
