Title: Poor quality material.
Product review: The author claims he is "authorized to transmit material" - well not on the evidence presented in this book. Sometimes we can be so full of ourselves...A serious factual error on page 2 (repeated later in the book, and undermining the credibility the author professes to have), mis-spelling the names of his 'teachers', numerous typos, gross generalisations and dumbing-down of essential material do not bode well for this book.Add to this some mundane re-hashing and hackery of ideas (expressed concisely and appropriately outside this book by others clearly more qualified), a penchant for tittle-tattle, other people's stories, name-dropping, self-promtion and low-level writing skill points inevitably to the conclusion that this line of work demands much finer product in its representation.Any old rubbish will not do.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
