Title: Horrible Author
Product review: The author of this book is a court reporter, which is a ridiculously bloated way of saying "typist." That is all court reporters do, they take dictation. Yet, Vivien Spitz fancies herself a novelist, and she wastes rodiculous amounts of space and time narrating stories about herself instead of sticking to the topic of the book. As the author, she contributes nothing, and one would be better off simply reading the actual transcripts of the trials.The factual information in the book is the only interesting content, but to get the facts, the reader has to muddle through incessant personal stories about the typist.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
