Title: The title is accurate. The book is biased.
Product review: The book is heavily biased. I'm amazed that the author would put his name to such drivel, if it hadn't already been dragged through the mud, and apparently deservedly so if this book is any kind of example.Goldberg's thesis of liberal bias in the media is shown, BY HIS OWN ARGUMENTS, to be untrue, and in fact the reverse of his thesis. The media is clearly, in general, biased AGAINST liberals and liberal thought, and the author astonishingly provides examples of this.One can surmise from this book the real reasons behind Goldberg's sketchy past in journalism is an inability to make a compelling argument and support it with facts.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
