Title: Entertainingly Moronic
Product review: I'm almost ashamed to admit I read this book, as it was such a moronic piece of fiction. My excuse for starting it is that it was a hot topic at the time I read it (2004); my excuse for finishing it (and this is the shameful part, and the only reason I gave it 2 stars) is that it was a decent thriller, in a mindless sort of way--the literary equivalent of Die Hard 2, 3, 4, ... But the book was filled with such ridiculous and inexcusable errors of fact that it took the edge off whatever pulp pleasure I might have otherwise derived from it--and convinced me never to read another Dan Brown book, however desperate for escapist fiction I might become.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
