Title: An outline for another book.
Product review: I love Dominck Dunne's writing. I read him all the time in Vanity Fair and have read a few of his novels, so when I heard that he had written about the OJ trial I rushed to read it. However, this book unlike his other novels do not tell the story of the crime and the trial, it is a name dropping session. Dunne reports all the parties his fictional counter part Gus Bailey is invited to and who he sits next to.Worse still is the fact that this book is an outline of the book he was going to write about the Mendez trial. A several points during the story he writes about the chapter Gus has just written for his book about the Mendez's brothers. I wish he had written the book about the Mendez it probably would have been a better book.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
