Title: challenging but worthwhile
Product review: As science on the topic of long-term effects of nukes continues to come in, Graeub has only been vindicated. The facts are there: low-level radiation devastates the environment. It's no accident cancer rates have shot up since the first A-bomb tests: that's neither "dogma" nor "hysteria": it's fact. And it's something the huge, and well-financed, nuclear energy industry would like you to forget.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
