Title: Boon, baby, boon!
Product review: Elinor Burkett points out that Clinton administration tax breaks go only to the well-to-do; poor children don't have a lobby in Washington. So the spenders keep spending (mommy vans, SUVs, home theater systems, ski vacations, designer child togs...but they're all FOR THE CHILDREN, doncha know) and the childfree by choice foot an unfair tax bill. Not to mention shouldering an unequal load at the office and largely having their employee benefit plan needs ignored. (Fat lot of good adoption benefits do for those who will never adopt.)Burkett includes a valuable historic exposition on how we came to this pass and how feminists sold out women who choose not to be mothers. She tries to be very clear that she (like many other childfree people) does not hate children, but inevitably this message will be misinterpreted by the breeder corps. After all, if you don't have a dog, that must mean you're anti-canine.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
