Title: Old technology fobbed off on unsuspecting buyers
Product review: If the default date is any indication, this recorder was manufactured in 2006. It is at least a generation older, probably more, than the recorder I am replacing. Rather than record mp3 files that automaticlly open iTunes when the recorder is inserted into the USB drive, it uses a proprietary software that is too old to run on VISTA. In short, I must go to the expense of returning it -- and hope I get my money back. Nowhere in the product description does it indicate that this recorder uses superceded technology and is incompatible with newer PCs.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
