Title: Flat and weak with golden speech
Product review: I was disappointed in reading this book. Quite often, Andrews will talk about something so far back in the past that it is unverifiable, and not give any kind of source to confirm that this is how she knows that fact. Quotes with no segue or reason appear regularly, and little is ever fully explained. If this had been written by Thomas Cahill in his "Hinges of History" series, the whole thing would have been improved. For my part, I could not find any reason to finish the book, but when I did (at last), I hadn't felt like I learned anything. I did not enjoy it and I think I am unlikely to ever read it again.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
