Title: Keegan's war
Product review: This is the history of the war as a conservative military historian would like it to be. It's not just the obvious ideology of Keegan's that is irritating. There are plenty of real factual errors. I've never heared of anyone claiming the Falaise pocket to be the largest tank battle of the war. Atrocious. It seems like he did not even research properly for his book and relied on someone else's ideas.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
