Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Uh, not very accurate historically
Review: Hmmm. This production omits that it was Richard II's gay relationship with De Vere that mainly caused the nobles' uprising against him. It even missed the significance of Richard placing what was basically a wedding ring on De Vere's finger after De Vere had died. That was the one episode I watched, figuring if it was that inaccurate (or, one fears, "sanitized for your protection"), then the rest was probably likewise skewed toward glib simplifications and recastings. Such a rich history. Such a shame not to tell it with less "editing." You can't fit 20 years in one show, but given how much the episode harped on De Vere and how jealous the others were of his influence with the king, uh, well. Most historians accept this view, so even if you didn't, it seems like you might at least state, uh, well, "most historians accept this view."
