Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Wrong facts, false analogies
Review: The author uses physics for analogies with organization behavior. There are two major problems here.First, her physics is completely wrong: she thinks that Newtonian systems don't exhibit chaotic behavior, that quantum mechanics is non-deterministic, and even that light (also known as EM field) is invisible.Second, the analogies are not justfied. She claims them with no reasons whatsoever, and then prescribes how an organization should work based on the false analogies.It would seem at times that she brings up physics to dull the readers' critical thinking by associating herself with an established science and by overloading readers with irrelevant (and wrong) info. After that the readers are supposed to swallow the false analogies as well as the conclusions that don't even follow from those analogies.
