Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Intransigent Evolutionist
Review: The author is knowledgable, but clearly a product of his own statement, "it is the job of science to resolve mysteries without recource to divine intervention." He in one voice says, "we will never know exactly which particular sequence of events produced the first life form." He supports the big bang and that "earthlife has not always existed, because the Earth itself has not always existed" , yet he reaches for other planets, other life, out there before earth. But the big bang says nothing, no other planet, or universe, existed before this one. Still no to either the divine or intelligent design. The evidence for him is not sufficient, even when he claims it is, to look to God in any possible way. Because it could be, he will not allow that to ever possibly be. This is very short-sighted for a "theoretical" physicist. Until proven otherwise, give credit where credit is due. Too subjective, not objective, to be a serious consideration of other than Mr. Davies own opinion.
