Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: could've been better
Review: A decent enough overview of the case's history, but poorly written and cripplingly biased. It's ironic that an account of a case which relied so heavily upon the facts (or distortion of the facts) is itself so careless with actual events and their motivations. While there is little doubt of Carter's innocence, the story of his case deserves an objective telling, which "the Canadians" (as the authors refer to themselves) do not provide. And would any American actually refer to slang as "black english"? If you're interested in the history of Carter's case, check it out, but skip the overwrought dramatic interludes and take everything with a grain of salt.
