Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Laughably poor science, and offensive too.
Review: As other reviewers have commented, the use of mathematics in this book is unbearably bad. And the "science" is, at best, pseudo-science. He uses his own methods to assess those same methods. His results don't hold up to double-blinded experiments, and require the researcher to be specifically seeking out the outcomes that will support the theory. In general, you should be suspicious of any theory which specifically states within it that only evidence in support of it should be considered, and that contradictory results should be ignored.And perhaps worst of all is the deeply offensive way in which these results are then applied. He uses his methods to rate the relative enlightenment levels of different religions, so that he can "prove" that Islam is a lower level of humanity than Christianity.Bad science is bad enough, and shouldn't be encouraged. But bad science being used as an attempt to intellectually justify bigotry is just disgusting.
