Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Inaccurate, poorly researched
Review: This tedious account of the Verdun of the Civil War is contradicted by first-person accounts of the period (see,for example, those in "Guide to the Battle of Shiloh" edited by Luvaas, Bowman, & Fullenkamp). Moreover, it is self-contradictory. On page 113, the Confederates burn down two 180-foot long bridges near Columbia, thus forcing the Union troops to cross a river "two hundred yards wide." (O.K., so those bridges wouldn't have been of much use anyway.) Those Union troops incidentally had "filed southwest from Nashville along the Central Alabama Railroad," a railroad that, alas, never came that far north.In his turgid battle descriptions, the author confuses left and right, east and west, and fails to label the Kentucky and Tennessesse regiments as to which side they are fighting for requiring the use of a magic marker and a second or third reading to truly figure out what is going on.
