Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: The Distempered Historian(s)
Review: Much of this book is an expansion of an essay on occult tarot published in an earlier (and better) Dummett work, 'The Game of Tarot', wherein we are told, rather as a preview to what we get here in WPC, that occult tarot is a corruption of the original intent for the cards, which was solely about playing card games, and that occultist interpretations of 'what it all means' have added nothing of value to tarot. In WPC this view (and agenda) is particularized with a tiresome and generally inaccurate portrayal of the ideas and influence of the French occultists who made modern (occult) tarot. The authors are not much interested in writing history, but are rather engaged in professional and dull-brained debunking, where no opportunity for ridicule of their subjects is missed, and little attention is spent investigating 'inconvenient' facts (the ones which DON'T support the arguments of the authors).
