Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Terrible
Review: Dor's articulation of Lacanian clinical structures reads more like a literary dramatization of certain character types than an engaged analysis of various Lacanian structures. Apart from occasionally throwing the terms "castration" and "phallus" about, he mostly lampoons stereotypical forms of neurosis in highly moralistic terms... For instance, he speaks of the "pathetic" attempts of obsessionals to keep women at bay by turning them into objects. Now why would a psychoanalyst refer to any behaviour on the part of his analysands as "pathetic" or even admirable? This book reads more like those popular personality diagnostics than a rigorous Lacanian analysis of psychic structures. If you're looking for a real introduction to the clinical dimension of Lacan's thought read Bruce Fink's _A Clinical Introduction to Lacan_ where you'll find both structural analysis of the three Lacanian types along with case studies. Don't waste your time on Dor.
