Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Is the Problem Clancy or his Publisher?
Review: This can not be the same person who wrote "Cardinal of the Kremlin" or EO. Or, if it is, then his publisher is simply trying to get the most revenue possible. The classic Clancy "How it Works" detailed description is missing or thin. For example, he details how the main characters handle one group of bad guys, but then provides a 10-20 word resolution of the other groups of bad guys. The REAL Clancy would have given us pages of good description of the other activities. The fuel is present, but there is no spark. It could be that Tom's publisher wanted a short book for business purposes. That's the only reasonable explanation for Tom's failure to create a book even close to his normal standard (except for that "Rabbit" thing which really was worse than "Teeth.")
