Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Full of typos and misprints
Review: This book is full of typos and misprints. For examples, in the following pages: 27, 33, 53, 54, 55, 56, 64, 66, 80 and 97, you could find many errors in the formulae.Some suggestions/amendments are quite naive. Just one example, in p.54, it was said that 'I would claim therefore that the positive instance criterion applies regardless of how P(Fa/h) and P(Fa) are related to one another, except where the positive instance constitutes disconfirmatory or nonconfirmatory evidence for a hypothesis implied by h" The author seems to be forgetting that h also implies h itself. The suggestion is totally nonsense!
