Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Fascinating, but...
Review: While Lyons has clearly done a mind boggling amount of research, I can't help wishing he'd done a bit more. I caught a couple of big mistakes, and there may well be yet more I'm not aware of. The ones I did get: in the review of The Sign of the Ram, he claims that this was Susan Peters "first and only film." In fact she made several films and was nominated for a Best Supporting Actress Oscar for Random Harvest! And in the review of Spectre of the Rose, Lyons misidentifies the leading actor: it's Ivan Kirov, not Michael Chekhov. (Chekhov does also appear in the film.) I found the book very interesting, but it would be a better book if Lyons had taken the time to get his facts straight.
