Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Anthropamorphic global warming = pre-conceptual science
Review: As anybody who does serious physics based simulations can tell you, a model is only worthwhile if it can be independently validated and verified. A significant conributor to the meme that humans are a significant factor in global warming are the predictions of unverified climate models. Most of the media and psuedo scientists don't mention these sticky little details. Currently, these models all predict certain relationships between surface and tropospheric temperatures that are not validated by the observed data...even after the much publicized corrections to the data. I find it amusing that this guy uses global warming as an example of right wing preconceptualism when it is much more likely that it is an example of left wing preconceptualism.
