Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: A popup
Review: I am very interested in and knowledgeable about baseball history. I like the idea of comparing players of different eras to each other. For example, how would dead ball slugger Homerun Baker compare to Babe Ruth and on to Barry Bonds? This book gives us an answer, and to some degree it seems valid. I wouldn't have used the particular methods that this author did, but I do agree that Ruth's homerun accomplishments were superior to Bonds's in this age of swatting souped up golf balls over the fence. But the fictional recreation of imaginary playoffs seemed like a bad idea, particularly since the author inserted a random chance factor in his results. Why? Why should a reader care what random results were arrived at? The book didn't hold my interest, though I think the premise isn't bad.
