Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Just another turn-bad movie screenplay!
Review: What happen here is a book that the author claimed to have at least 10 years research but definitely fell short since he could only get all the information from two books, not even could have the opportunity to copy some information from the out of print MEGALODON in 1983 and QUEST FOR MEGALODON published in 199? What kind of research is this? I totally agree to the comments from a great reader of gdeshazo@juno.com and only wish I could say better. I also have to say that the KIRKUS REVIEW OF 4/15/97 shown above, is a very stupid review. Because the reviewer has almost told the whole detailed story for this try-to-be-in-depth, single-minded book! We don't need a reviewer to dump us any book with the whole 9 yards. This kind of review could only make a simple story look even simpler and worse
