Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Shoes at Gettysburg not part of the aftermath.
Review: Why did this author devote significant space to a discussion of the question of "shoes at Gettysburg" in a book allegedly devoted to the aftermath of the battle? Thatis a point for discussion in considering the overall battle andit preliminaries, and it should certainly not be in this book.The author's decision to include such non-aftermath topics weakens the entire presentation. His factual errors(i.e. John Buford's Union cavalry troopers and their"alleged" repeating carbines) compound the weaknesses.Just buy one of the many worthwhile studies of theaftermath listed in the bibliography of this poor excuse for abook. You'll save money and thank yourself in the long run.
