Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Tabloid history lacking in accuracy
Review: True to their sensationalistic "Dirty Little Secrets" series, Dunnigan and Nofi once again take the tabloid approach to history. Their eye for trivia is all encompassing and presented with the arrogance of 20/20 hindsight. Every item is presented with cynicism and an overpowering aire of contempt. The message is clear: If Dunnigan and Nofi had been running World War II we wouldn't have needed all those military dolts who blundered their way through it. If their arrogance isn't bad enough, the authors' factual errors complete the damage. The least and most obvious of such errors are misidenfication of ships.The worst errors come from their pop history tabloid approach. When they claim carriers were only developed because senior officers wanted to keep a few more high ranking billets around in an era of limited battleship commands they are showing their truest, most sensational and cynical colors. These gentlemen should work for the Star or the Enquirer.
