Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Tragic Mistranslation
Review: Starr writes in the preface "Who was I to speak for this enlightened being and assign myself as his personal editor?...John is a Christian mystic known for using only the lightest touches when it comes to direct Christian reference. These have been minimized still further, not out of disrespect for Christianty, far from it, but because I felt that this way the universality of his wisdom would shine through even more brightly...."In the very least Starr has defaced a work of art. At worst, Starr has authored a book that purposefully misrepresents a book guided and inspired by God. She calls John an enlightened being and then tries to improve him. If it is right to alter a masterpiece, should we edit Shakespeare? Or if no inspired work is untouchable, should we tear out pages from Scripture?
