Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Disappointing mush from two greats
Review: Harman is unclear. Thomson, in her half of the book, writes that she cannot understand him. As best I can tell, he's saying that moral debate is just a power struggle. That's what he's got to say in order to uphold his view that moral judgments are just emotings devoid of truth value. Of course, if you believe something false, you'll probably have to strain to accept other false things, too, but if you write unclearly enough, so that even your coauthor admittedly cannot understand you, perhaps you can hide your false beliefs from view. For her part Thomson says that after the book was commissioned, she realized that what she was going to write was false, but, since it was too late by then, she'd tell it to us anyway. The whole thing is unconscienable. There are so many bad philosophers around that, if the good ones go bad, we'll be in deep trouble.
