Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied?
Title: Still, a DEEPLY FLAWED Game. A poor successor to Civ 2.
Review: A year ago Civ 3 was released, being rushed to market in time for the Holiday buying season - just as its company, Firaxis, has rushed the Expansion for Civ 3, Play the World, to market.It took over half a year, and four patches to get Civ 3 free of most bugs and major problems; however, it remains a deeply flawed game with many bad concepts. It simplifies history compared to the great Civ 2, makes user interface cumbersome, and creates various annoying quirks with Espionage, Diplomacy, among others, all that while giving us lots meaningless superficial cute graphics.Civ 3 was missing many vital aspects, such as Multiplayer. Play the World, finally, gives us MP, but even that is messed up. It needed an immediate patch, which is inexcusable, and even then slows down an already slow game even more, while causing occasional crashes.Even with PTW, Civ 3 remains a huge disappointment, and an unworthy successor to the classic. Civ 2.
