Title: A real deception
Product review: I expected a book solidly based on scientific data and what I have found is superficial references to certain experiments, the repetition of a couple of names of scientists mentioned to sustain the theory of "the field" and the rest is pure speculation.Lynne McTaggart is not a scientist but does not know how to do science journalism either.She tries to convince the reader, but her case is not duly substantiated. Some ideas here and there are provocative and that is why I give this book just one star.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
