Title: Bad concept for a board game
Product review: As others have mentioned this is a good idea, but because there is virtually no structure or rules, it is guaranteed to end in argument or confusion. For example, let's say that the category is "something you would see in a park", and the letter is "L". Someone says "lake". OK, maybe that makes sense. Then someone says "little dog". Really? Maybe... The someone says "little cat". Huh? Is two words OK? Wouldn't you have cats and dogs anywhere, not just in a park? In fact, couldn't you name just about any object beginning with an L and say that you could find it in a park? A lunchbox, a lion, a leprechaun. You could make a case for anything... and so that's the major flaw with this game. It gets more and more frustrating as people stretch their guesses more and more to include ANYTHING, just so they could claim "last word".
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
