Title: Not much content
Product review: In the tradition of Fowler and then Quatrani, I'm going to start out by telling you what this book isn't:1) It is not a good book2) It is not a very useful book3) It is not a good value for the moneyWell then, what is it? It's a simple-minded tutorial of Rose and visual modeling ( heavy on the simple minded ). I was looking for a book with a lot more meat in it. This is the kind of book I might pay $7.99 for if I felt flush. The book would be more appropriately titled "Basic Visual Modeling" or something. It's not advanced enough - heck, it's not even intermediate enough. Perhaps, like Fowler, she didn't want to put much into it so she wouldn't step on the three amigos' toes since they're writing their own books on the subject. I hope those books will be better.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
