Title: Inadequate
Product review: This book fails to capture the essence of Hapkido. In fact, it would take volumes of works to do that. I disagree, however, with other reviews that say that what is shown is TKD. The mechanics may be similar, but the philosophy behind the teaching is different and distinctly Hapkido. Still, I am unsatisfied with the book because it fails to convey the feeling of motion and adaptability that is inherent in the art.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
