Title: Poor Biblical analysis
Product review: Eldridge attempts too much to draw on modern, cultural perceptions on men and women. Though he may have some good ideas with varying degrees of merit, his sources are almost all Hollywood movies and when he does use the Bible, his interpretation and insight is shallow, strangely skewed, and taken out of context.some points for considerationIt is strange how he openly advocates violence, telling his son to resort to violenceThough he says he does not advocate open theism, he claims that God is the biggest risk taker of all, who gave man free will as a risk. This is simply false because it means that God does not know events in the future. This of course is ridiculous.This is too seeker sensitive and is an example of the strange winds of doctrine Paul warned against. It is merely a fad that will not last due to lack of Biblical merit.I recommend Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism by John Piper and Wayne Grudem
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
