Title: Hata is careless with sources and commits sloppy analysis
Product review: Hata writes a great book apart from the fact that the sources chosen are overly biased and Hata does not acknowledge this. Also the fact that Hata goes into this foray with a direct intention to discredit Iris Chang with her claims in the Rape of Nanking is damaging to what is otherwise a plausible extrapulation of a complex issue.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
