Title: No scientific evidence
Product review: The Wiki review says it better than I: [...], but as a practicing chiropractor, I object to AK misrepresenting itself as "kinesiology". It isn't. AK also has no basis in science. It is similar to a now-defunct bogus treatment of autism to channel communication by autistic children by using keyboards manipulated by the parents of those children, who were simply unconsciously typing in what they wanted to hear from their children. AK has no test-re-test reliability and misunderstands neurology. While I held out hope for AK, it appears that it really has no place in medicine, chiropractic or otherwise, although doctors will continue to use it as an excellent way to manage patients' compliance with treatment recommendations (read: better for the doctor; not so good for patients).
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
