Title: not science - just religion in disguise (or maybe astrology)
Product review: This is not really science. If there were anything of real scientific value to this, Behe would be in line for Nobel Prize for discrediting evolutionary accounts in biochemistry. But, in fact, he is considered a crackpot by the scientific community. He points out some aspects of biochemistry, which he claims are not explainable via evolution. 1) his claims have been roundly clobbered by other scientists as being untrue 2) even if something has not been explained does not mean it is "unexplainable" in principle. This whole argument has been around since William Paley in the 1800s- there is nothing new here. Behe is the guy who spoke in favor of Intelligent Design in Dover PA - the same guy who admitted that if his concept of science were accepted, astrology could be considered science.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
