Title: The Worst of Three Math Econ Books
Product review: I bought this book for my Ph.D.-level mathematical economics course, and although I'd gotten an A+ both in Calc I and the honors section of Calc II the year before, I could make neither head nor tails out of the book. Sure, de la Fuente might work alright if you already think fluently in mathematics, but even if you do, you'll probably find Simon and Blume's book superior. If you don't think fluently in math, I'd suggest Alpha C. Chiang's math econ text instead. If you're just trying to learn mathematical economics, don't even open de le Fuente or you might find yourself unnecessarily abandoning the study of economics.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
