Title: A Waste of an Academic Scholar's Time
Product review: The chapter on Mormonism alone is so filled with bias, sarcasm, manipulated information and harsh, radical opinions -- NOT FACTS -- that the book's credibility is totally lost. It is obviously written with partial truths to drive home prejudicial points, not with any comparative intent or scholarly value.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
