Title: Interesting, but ultimately disappointing.
Product review: The author's scholarliness and combatitiveness are impressive. His basis thesis is well articulated and defended. His candour when hypothesizing on uncharted ground is refreshing.However, his frequent logic chopping and reversion to academese in his many subsidiary arguments mar the credibility of much of the book's minor theses.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
