Title: Written with clear bias
Product review: I got "The Minnesota" looking specifically for historic accounts of wildlife along the Minnesota River, knowing it would mostly be about people. While it was lacking in wildlife accounts, I found instead a biased document account of the Minnesota River. Based on his choice of words throughout the book, published first in 1962, Evan Jones highly regards the efforts of white explorers, settlers, and politicians and is repugnant toward native people, lifestyle, and landscape. This blatant bias makes this book very difficult to read if you are a person just looking for facts.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
