Title: what is Simon thinking?
Product review: I read all 3 of Simon's books on the history of Britain. I did it because I am a history buff. However, Simon writes in a way that makes it difficult to remember anything about the book. Instead of focusing on significant historical events and figures, he weaves in alot of information and persons that are either not that relevant or difficult to place in context. I think his whole series is average at best. Surely, someone can do better.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
