Title: The best way to discredit this entire book.
Product review: I need to only say 3 things-1. Examining Johnson's sources and statements reveal an incredible amount of quote mining and misrepresentations.2. The bulk of "arguments" he's leveled against evolution have been answered extensively by the scientific community.3. Phillip Johnson is not a scientist. He is a law professor, and as such is better suited towards knowing how to lie convincingly rather than express facts accurately and without misrepresentations, as scientists do.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
