Title: you must be joking
Product review: Cremo's work is nonsensical. The scholarship is questionable. The arguments typically proceed from a misunderstanding of the evidence or a faulty analysis of the processes at work. "Perhaps" is not a convincing argument. I've seen this type of nonsense many a time. Indeed, traditional answers leave various lacunae, but Cremo's sensationalist jazz neither advances his agenda nor satisfactorily calls into question the mountains of solid work accumulated over centuries. Significantly, Cremo's material adheres to no structure, espouses no philosophy, gels in no wise, but merely offers anecdote atop anecdote to persuade the reader to ask, "Gee, what if; well, I suppose that's conceivable." Please, just take a pass on this abject nonsense.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
