Title: Anti-Mormon Drivel masquerading as history
Product review: The book is filled with speculative leaps and assumptions that leave the reader wondering about Vogel's mental and interpretive gymnastics. The author accepts without criticism sources critical of Joseph Smith, yet dismisses sympathetic sources out of hand. This book is basically an attempt to set forth Anti-Mormon arguments and bigotry under the guise of credible history rather than trashy expose like Ed Decker and his ilk.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
