Title: Disappointing Quality Control
Product review: My first ukulele, a Johnson UK-120, was well made and has stood the test of time. Since then, I have purchased other, more expensive instruments. Recently, out of curiosity more than necessity, I purchased the Johnson UK-150. Between "then and now", quality control appears to have slipped at Johnson. In addition to flaws in the finish, the bridge broke loose from the top of the ukulele after about a month of occasional playing. A bit of golf club shafting epoxy restored its integrity, but repair work shouldn't be required so soon. Being curious, I looked up other recent reviews of Johnson ukuleles and noted that other people were reporting inconsistent quality control as well. Buyer beware.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
