Title: Flashy but flawed
Product review: Nicely presented, but heavily reliant on French sources. Even then, injudiciously choosen to the point that Col. Elting disavows the use of Thiebalt in the forward. Completely at sea when discussing Allies, it is based on secondary sources missing some important ones, and often presenting footnotes that are irrelevant, anachronistic, or flatly contradictory to the text they preport to support. Egregious errors in the technical information. Attack on Chandler distasteful, attack on Griffith completely incoherent as Griffith essentially agrees about Soult!
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
