Title: Distort data to support his idea.
Product review: The author obviously mispresented data from surveys to support his idea. For example on p.24 and p.25, the author made a comparison between percentage of people who oppose handgun ownership and that who OWN handguns nd draw a conclusion that the former outnumbered. This is an absurd comparison for reasons that I believe would be explicit for most people. Obviously not every person who supports handgun ownership is necesssarily a handgun owner. The author is either incapable for this or intentionally distorted the data to mislead readers. Have not read a lot of this book yet.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
