Title: Some questions that history readers formulate on their own
Product review: Hancock surely makes some interesting questions, not answered by mainstream archeology. On the other hand, he seems to have had an idea and made all facts fit it, disregarding other input or other interpretations.Also, he has used a number of fiction writers tricks to make those ideas come through (like finding a "badie" - in this case, archeologists to- get sympathy for his ideas).Anyway, he does point to some unexplained archeology misterys, which haven't been well explained, so it may be worth reading for those not particularly keen on dry history reading. On the whole though, it is the kind of book that that just makes its author wealthier.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
