Title: Usual creationist pseudoscience
Product review: This book contains recycled creationist pseudoscience, based on distortions and misrepresentations of science. For example, Wells, argues that the presence of oxygen in the Earth's early atmosphere (ignored in experiments on synthesis of organic molecules) is as serious problem. Here's a quote from the abstract of a Kasting (1993) paper which is one of his most recent citations "supporting" his claim: "It is generally agreed that the atmosphere contained little or no free oxygen initially and that oxygen concentrations increased markedly near 2.0 billion years ago, but the precise timing of and reasons for its rise remain unexplained."Need I say more...
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
