Title: This book didn't fool me
Product review: I agree with the reviewer who remarked that the author was just "showing off how well he could write." McCammon injects his acquired, adult maturity into this little twelve-year-old, and we're supposed to believe this kid is this smart, this mature. Just because description is ample and words are carefully chosen doesn't necessarily mean the book is well written. I'd rather read something more credible, something along the lines of _Where the Red Fern Grows_, which, by the way, is head and shoulders above this collection of unattached, irrelevant thoughts.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
