Title: teleology + logic = contradiction
Product review: "This is what a teleological argument should look like. Moreland is concise and logical as always."Would someone please explain how an effect to a cause follows cause to effect? The person who said this below obviously does not understand modern logic or epistemology. Oh, and there is no such thing as scientific evidence for the existence of God, or against. I would suggest Hans Reichenbach or later to get an accurate view of the logical positivism (AKA logical empiricism) that is required by science. The difference between science and philosophy is one word: metaphysics. God is a subject of philosophy and not science. If you really want to learn more about reality my e-mail address is up there. I don't even have to open the book if somebody who has just read the book thinks that causality and teleology are reconcilable.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
