Title: Totally Debunked
Product review: In the Jan/Feb 2003 issue of Skeptical Inquirer there is an article by Ray Hyman titled "How Not to Test Mediums". Mr. Hyman, who is a psychologist and Professor Emeritus at the University of Oregone, totally demolishes Mr. Schwartz's methods and conclusions. The critique is devastating. Mr. Hyman shows how the research by Mr. Schwartz is flawed in many, many ways. Mr. Hyman points out many instances that Mr. Schwartz's 'research' deviated from established procedures and norms. Mr. Schwartz has ignored the accepted scientific methodology.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
