Title: Authors use very spurious evidence
Product review: John Ankerberg and John Weldon have tag teamed in numerous books that offer their clarification of the unconventional religions of the world. However, I find two repeating flaws in their works, including this one, in whichy they both take documents out of their contexts and misinform the reader about "the facts". The fact is that Weldon and Ankerberg use doubtful evidence to back up their claims; they make logical leaps that only the careful eye can detect as fallacious. I have used these works to teach my writing class about poor use of evidene and extravagant claims. Their writing is hyperbolic and often redundant.There is a diversity of other texts to explore before this one. Don't start with this book. It's just not worth your time or your money.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
