Title: Bubblegum Anti-Science
Product review: Wells reasoning is intellectually equivalent to a rejection of modern physics based on the refutation of explanations to pre-schoolers of how the sun shines or the deficiencies of "True Science" sections in 1950s comicbooks.Perhaps his next undertaking will be to refute organic chemistry because phlogiston is still mentioned in many high-school texts.It's a shame that the most gullible and science deficient will be waylaid by this irrelevent, fallacious account.Wells tells the largest "silent" lie: all of his "icons" are antiquated fringes disseminated by a poor scholastic system and lazy textbook publishers.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
