Title: Falls short and misrepresents evolution
Product review: I expected better from a professional Biochemist. While Behe accepts many tenants underlying the theory of evolution (e.g., an ancient earth, common descent from a primordial ancestor)--which are clearly supported by hard data--he proposes that there are some things that are unexplainable by evolutionary means. Essentially, it is a "God of the Gaps" argument, in that which cannot be explained by naturalistic evolutionary changes, must be due to God.Unfortunately, what Behe claims to be unexplainable by Science are simply things that are not yet explained. Just because an defendable explaination has not yet been found doesn't mean that one will not be found in the future. Furthermore, many of his arguments betray a lack of understanding of the theory he criticises, or boil down to a cavelier dismissal of alternate theories.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
