Title: Good ideas, presented in an extremely biased manner
Product review: Having just read the book and reread these reviews, I am struck by the unarguable fact that the lower-starred reviews actually review the book, while the four and five star entries are advocates expressing their support for the author's position. This is a very frustrating book to read, not because what the author says is wrong, but because it is so unbalanced. The author fixates on the good that may come from 'freeing' content, but completely fails to discuss the 'chilling effect' such actions can have on artists who don't want their work to be freed. The author mocks and demonizes 'big media' without acknowledge that it supports the innovation and creativity of artists and artisans who chose to be a part of it.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
