Title: a good film but not a good adaptation
Product review: I'll have to disagree with most of the reviewers of this latest effort of translation Dickens' classic story. First of all, there are too many important scenes ommited. Also, some important charcters of the original stories have become so one dimentional that their presences seem not revalent at all. Pitt's sister Geogiana, who is supposed to be so vivid in the book, has been reduced to a totally dull character without any emotion. Anyway, I would suggest everyone to go back to the 1946 David Dean's version, which is far superior than this 1999 one.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
