Title: Not Science
Product review: This book is not about science. It is religion masking itself as science. A more honest title would have been "The religion before science". I just heard him being interviewed on the Catholic religious channel EWTN and he explained how when human sperm and egg cells join a soul is created/affixed to them. Science doesn't have much to say about religion, Dr. Rizzi should try not saying much about science. I found his description of Koko (the signing gorilla) embarrassing, he kept referring to her as a "he". Dr. Rizzi would have been more believable if he had at least researched the topic enough to learn the gender of the animal that he was describing.I'm not meaning to attack any religion or philosophy but simply make clear that this book is religious/philosophical and is in no way a history of science as the title alludes.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
