Title: Rests on a single flawed assumption.
Product review: Professor Behe's entire argument rests on the assumption that a biological system whose parts are all necessary in its current configuration must all have been developed simultaneously.This simply is not true. There are clear counterexamples in many lines of vertebrate evolution, in which structures that developed for one function have been adapted to other functions, and even some in which structures that once had an essential function persist even though they can be removed without observable harm to the individual. This is true at both the macro level and at the micro level.Behe proposes an interesting hypothesis in this book, but he does not prove it.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
