Title: In the dumpa
Product review: In a classic case of betraying her true motivation for producing this disc, Sarah has copy protected it! One would think that she hadn't already made enough millions off the songs on it (What, maybe $10 million?) So, she copy protects it using SunnComm software to prevent her "adoring" and "wonderful" fans from using the music as they see fit. I guess making millions off her recordings is not sufficient. I would urge everybody inclined to like this music to examine Sarah's true motives - money, not pleasure! Skip it until she insists on removing copy protection.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
