Title: Great work of Literature....
Product review: I think when the previous reviewer said this book was a great work of literature, he hit it dead on. It is a great Literary work, considering his theory changes from one book to the next and at will to suit his purpose. He claims to be an amateur and yet I will admit the theory is interesting yet the facts he chose to prove it are as unfounded as the mysteries he chose to disprove. There is no rock solid undisputable evidence to prove to me there was technological marvels on Antarctica or that the remnants are still two miles below the surface.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
