Title: very interesting, but...
Product review: colin rose's "accelerated learning" is like sheila ostrander and lynn schroeder's "superlearning", where it discusses the "learning how to learn" techniques that are heavily based on the seminal work of dr georgi lozanov's "suggestology/suggestopedy". however, the former book is much better in presentation of facts and it discusses beyond dr lozanov's work.it is interesting to note that the book applies what it teaches. for example, the book has a highly visual "memory maps" at the end of each chapter that serves as a summary.however, i'm a little bit disappointed because of the book's lack of documentation, i.e., whenever there is presentation of an experimental study or a fact, the author occasionally fails to cite the source, whether from a book or from an academic journal. because of this, interested scholars are discouraged to trace the original source to look for evidence.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
