Title: Deeply flawed arguments
Product review: If there is any scientific consensus regarding solar, it is that it is expensive now but that it will once be our most important source of energy (unless fusion or some yet to be discovered source of energy takes off).The debate is more a question of WHEN and in this debate this "professor" is certainly not what you would call a "peer reviewed resource".If you are afraid to believe in the promise of Solar and want some thorough but not too technical scientific credentials of the highest order I would direct you to online lectures of nobel prize winning Richard Smalley and for even harder data professor Nathan Lewis.And about the cost: the question is again WHEN the cost will become competitive. Hardly any researcher in the field questions the assumption that it will be once be cheaper that coal. The question is: does it take untill 2020 or does it take untill 2100. Research for yourself and be pleasantly surprised!
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
