Title: Realy necessary?
Product review: A big part of the book Frawley tells about a legendary stupid modern Astrology, in his opinion. Especelly it's hard to see or to recognize in detail, what the problem is. the modern astrology or the modern astrologers, they are surely an object of hate and never ending stories, in this book. Ok, but must we pay for this? And the so-colled modern Astrology is realy not impalpable, like a bugy, without shape and life.On the other side, this isn't a serious and sufficiently book about acient astrology or strong foundations or history of western horoskopic astrology. In short sections Frawley tells about several classical astrological elements, in a sight of the classical century of english Astrology, between 1600 and 1700. The author ignores konsequently the different streams in acient time, the different origins - and constitutive hellenistic astrologers.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
