Title: Long on fiction, short on facts
Product review: I wouldn't be surprised if the tobacco industry commissioned this work. It wouldn't be the first time. In fact, some (most)of the reports cited that exonerate smoking, even the "scientific" ones, were produced with the generous funding and blessing of the industry. The public is unaware of these numerous unpublished reports, saying smoking is not harmful, simply because these claims will not hold water.Keeping the controversy alive is one of the industry's schemes to create and maintain doubt in people's minds regarding the obvious ill health effects of smoking. But they'll use "independent" minds and organizations as their mouthpiece.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
