Title: Decent, but missed many points
Product review: This movie was a decent response to Fahrenheit 9/11, but only decent. It mostly talked about the film techniques Moore used, such as changing the relative size of newspaper headlines and showing parts of interviews (and as I have studied documentaries a lot, it is a simple truth that both sides of the aisle use these techniques. all documentaries are biased in some way). They don't really go after his argument at all, which would have been the only common-sense thing to do. Plus, the quality of the film itself is poor, as it is mostly talking heads and not much else.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
