Title: Misleading
Product review: This is not a serious work of history. The author, a novelist, clearly has a problem with the Catholic Church's teaching on issues of sexuality and authority. He is gripped by an inexplicable hatred of John Paul II, a courageous foe of anti-Semitism. The result is an anti-Catholic fantasy disguised as a history of anti-Semitism.Many reviewers have noted the outrageously unfair use of sources and the obvious suppression of evidence.This serious issue deserves far more than the cavalier, biased rantings of this novelist, who cannot separate history from his own bitter autobiography as an ex-priest.How sad that this work of prejudice could be taken as serious history by anyone.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
