Title: here we go again
Product review: Here we go again, commentary. Why not stick to the genuine article, in this case, ACIM? As a long time student and practitioner of the Course, I never believed for a minute the author's story of the angels on the couch. It all smacked of the desire for "specialness", the very thing the Course exposes for what it's worth. But to tell you the truth, I couldn't get through the book. Everything inside shouted, "No!" In fundamentalist terms, I guess one would say a "false teaching" or a "false prophet". I will not judge that to be true or not, but only put it out there that that was my (very strong) sense in reading Renard's book. I have not had this sense in reading Jampolsky or Wapnick or Williamson. Anyone else's gut-hit on this??
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
