Title: Dishonest
Product review: The authors understanding of the Second Amendment is not sincere to historical fact. The national guard (a government force) was formed by an act of congress in 1913. Well over a century after the bill of rights and Second Amendment were ratified in 1779.The "militia" as clearly stated within the amendment is "the people". The entire premise of the bill of rights was to protect civilian authority by having the means to protest and wage war if necessary having just won a revolution! By what logic does this author gain the view of a government force needing a "right" to bear arms? Which amounts to nothing less than an intellectually dishonest effort to read the Second Amendment out of existence. Something that the enemies of the first amendment might apply one day.I would suggest reading "The Bill of Rights" by Akhil Reed Amar" for an accurate understanding of this "doomsday provision"."The framers recognized that self-government required bullets as well as ballots"- A.R. Amar
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
