Title: A Mother's Subjective Point of View
Product review: This was clearly written from a mother's subjective point of view. While it included many of Margie's accomplishments, it did little to describe how she actually overcame obstacles in her path toward professional Grand Prix riding. How did she obtain exclusive rights to horses from Hidden Creek's stables? How did she manage entry and travel fees before she was a recognized rider? How did her size help or hinder her riding? One reviewer's statement that this was written from a "mother's, third person objective point of view" is comical. No mother can write about a child, of whom they are so obviously proud, objectively. This was clearly from a mother's subjective point of view. This could certainly be considered a "delightful diversion" by any pre-teen. Serious riders should stick with the Chronicle of the Horse for factual "objective" information. And I,too, question why the Kelton Family's review was left twice.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
