Title: Orgel's second rule: "Evolution is clever than you are"
Product review: It's certainly clever than Michael Behe's arguments in this creationist tract.His "argument from irreducible complexity" is just the "argument from personal incredulity" all over again. Fawned over by other creationists, this book simply isn't science; not a single paper faced peer review. And a good thing for Behe, since the irreducible complexity that he claims to disprove evolution with is actually fully expected and accounted for by neo-Darwinism.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
