Title: non-science.
Product review: For the reader who would like to understand this book's serious shortcomings, I highly recommend comparing it with Fred Wilson's excellent monograph "Empiricism and Darwin's Science". It is volume 47 of the University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, and can be borrowed from any of several university libraries through interlibrary loan.Professor Wilson teaches philosophy at the University of Toronto. In this monograph, he carefully explains the differences between normal science and revolutionary science, and between science and non-science. He also provides clear examples from the work of Kepler, Newton, Lavoisier, Mendeleev, Pasteur and Darwin to illuminate his points. Thoughtful comparison with each of these examples will show the informed reader just where the arguments put forward in "The Creation Hypothesis" have fallen short.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
