Title: Ideas: 10, close readings: 2
Product review: Once again Sedgwick provides a brilliant theoretical framework for thinking about contemporary queer identity issues, then trilalizes it by providing reductive and just-plain-unconvincing readings of a series of Western novels and novellas. Her reading of James's "The Beast in the Jungle" is a classic case in point--the idea of preterition as a point of slippage is brilliant, but her reading of the James novella is embarrassing.And she is one of the worst stylists in academia today.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
