Title: more hollywood muck
Product review: indiana jones has been made. it came out 20 years ago, and was a hit. two sequels of excellent quality followed. why is it that hollywood cant let things go? how many times must there be an attempt to place indiana jones in a different locale, different era, with a different cast? and this, by far, is one of the longest leaps hollywood has made in the "stick-to-the-crap-that-has-worked-before" plan. nicholas cage. he could have had a great career. everything was looking so good, then his complete obsession with elvis somehow took over. mr cage you are NOT elvis presley. stop with the collared shirts. youre also balding, so when they throw a toupee on you in every film, everyone kinda chuckles. the storyline to this film is ludicrous at best, and barely researched. yes there are some neat-o things, but i got a bigger thrill from reading angels and demons from dan brown. its a silly movie. entertaining, but silly.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
