Title: Bogus Reproduction
Product review: I bought this in the expectation that it was a reproduction of an essay by Henry Wilberforce Clarke. It's clearly written by someone else (the author notes at one point that he/she is "indebted to H. Wilberforce Clarke's notes," or something to that effect, and there's no way Clarke would have thanked himself, would he? This is a very slender volume that has little of interest to anyone studying Sufism and mysticism, and is misattributed to an author whose work is now occasionally coming back into print.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
