Title: Ivinswhacked
Product review: Ivins is an idealogue who despises all conservatives and Republicans; her problem is not with Bush but rather with anyone who isn't liberal. The book makes this quite apparent. The book contains many half-truths to support her disdain for Bush. If Bush successfully helped bring about world peace, Ivins would lambast Bush for doing so, saying that Bush created world peace merely for political reasons. Remember that Kerry and Bill Clinton have stated publicly and unequivocally that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction and needed to be stopped at all costs. Ivins conveniently refuses to mention this fact in her politically skewed diatribe. Anyone could write a book saying similar things about the Clintons and Kerry. This book is no different from Ann Coulter's--only on the other side of the political spectrum. There's little concern for fairness and journalistic integrity in Ivins' book.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
