Title: Classic crackpot.
Product review: This book is a real classic example of crackpot thinking. Leonard picks NASA photos to show that "someone else is on the moon". But the amazing structures he sees in these photos are just at the edge of resolution. Alas, he never mentions that NASA has images (publically available) of the exact same areas but taken much closer to the ground. They show nothing unusual. Leonard's book is a wonderful example of how crackpots and pseudoscientists refuse to examine evidence that shows their crazy theories to be wrong.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
