Title: A brilliant record of the history of man.
Product review: This is a meticulous and patient presentation of the evidence that "modern" man has been around for a much longer length of time than the evolutionists will acknowledge. Current science holds that modern man is 200,000 years old or less. Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson take that notion to task in a painstaking review of the record by going back to the original sources of antiquated archeological finds and reevaluating them in an unbiased fashion. They manage to push man's origins back to at least one million years with no trouble at all. Their case-by-case review of published literature dating from the mid-nineteenth century until the present is fascinating. This is not a casual read for a weekend. It is a tough, scholarly work that makes you think about the "science" in the established scientific community.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
