Title: Why isn't Hank qualified?
Product review: I find it interesting the amount of people who say that Hank should not have written this book because he is not qualified. He is not a computer programer and is not invloved in computer issues. Why is it that these same people say Grant Jeffery is qualifed? Does Jeffery have any more experience than Hank? I found this book refreshing in a few ways. 1)Unlike the normal accusations thrown, Hank looks at and critiques the veiws of men that he respects and says they are wrong in their views. Normally people say he only attacks Charimatics (which he doesn't) and people of the Faith movement (in that he only attacks theology, not the people themselves); 2) This book (unlike Jeffery's) is well documented making it easy to double check Hanks finding. In Jeffery's book you are lucky if you get the year and article was published.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
