Title: Disappointing exploration of Kantian Cosmology
Product review: Langton has yet again exhibited her strange prejudices for the sensual in discourse. Instead of providing us with an interesting discussion of the things-in-themselves debate, she has opted for the dull strategy of deflating "hyper-Idealism" by using the Idealism-by-default hypothesis. This is not a wise strategy and fails. Sad, as Langton is a promising man in the field.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
