Title: Another way to tarnish Castaneda's contributions
Product review: The book seemed another way to make money by a relative of a famous person, although Castaneda never intended to be famous. He rarely interviewd (I have read only one interview), no pictures taken from him, and never advertised a new philosophy or painted himself as a new "guru" or anything of that sort. Besides, living with a person for some time does not make one expert about than person. To know Castaneda deeply, read the original works.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
