Title: Unmitigated hookum
Product review: I had a professor who once likened Ms. Goodrich's manner of research to that of a person much in love with a book and determined to never see it end. His other comment went along this line. (as Goodrich) "Ah, I have my copy of Malory! Now I am in Scotland! Well, Malory describes a place much like this, so Arthur must have been here" (as himself) "...forgetting of course that, assuming Arthur even lived, the story would have taken place about 1000 years before Malory was born."Goodrich is not a careful scholar. She is not even realy a scholar, if these are her credentials. Nor is she a good enough writer to provide much other than confusion to a standard reader of Arthurian material. This book, and those that followed, are a hopeless tangle of badly put together theories that bear as much resemblance to Arthur as "Braveheart" did to William Wallace.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
