Title: Poor writing = poor book
Product review: This book is a very difficult read, much like Carrasquillo's other books. It is not because the material is challenging or because Carrasquillo asks us to think at a high level. It is beause Carrsquillo's writing style is poor, and her ideas only halfway conceived. In this way, it continues in the tradition of her earlier works. (I have been unfortunate to read her books because I have worked closely with her.) Carrasquillo is simply unintelligible at times, complicating what are in essence simple obvious statements, unworthy of passing off as academic work. Definitely a book only for those who enjoy readin (or are forced to read) the flawed essays and poor writing ithat characterize Carrasquillo's work.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
