Title: Terrible, rambling pseudo-science
Product review: This book deals with some important and interesting subjects, but I really struggled with the writing style - everything is "amazing". Even more concerning was the seeming complete disregard for the scientific method (which is not the same as scientific dogma). Hypotheses are frequently presented as conclusions, and there is no time spent on arguing or presenting alternative theories. Very disappointing.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
