Title: Non-fiction accounts are far more compelling
Product review: The only good thing that I have to say about this book is that it led me to re-examine the non-fiction accounts of the characters involved in the assassination conspiracy. The factual material is far more interesting than anything Mr. Robertson twisted around to fit into his "novel." John Surratt's true story as a confederate courier (not photographic assistant to Mr. Gardner as this story has it) would make for a far more compelling story. I found it disturbing that for the story's sake, Mr. Robertson had a sexual affair go on between Booth and Mrs. Surratt. The true story of Mrs. Surratt's probable innocence would itself be worthwhile reading. I could go on with examples (but I won't). Don't waste your time or money on this book. If you are interested in John Wilkes Booth and the story of the assassination conspiracy, there are tons of fascinating non-fiction books out there on the subject.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
