Title: A fantasy clothed in the appeal of self-rightousness
Product review: As with most of those who quote the Second Amendment, the authors conveniently omitted the first part of sentence. And in doing so, destroyed any validity to their arguments. The chapter containing the discussion between the Chapmans was so contrived, it read more like a teacher talking to a class room of students. A real John Greenwood would not have been 'turned' so easily, he would have experienced more anguish than we were shown. In an attempt to copy the style of Robert Heinlein's juvenile novels, the authors just trashed one of the very best science-fiction writers. Zelman & Smith wrote a book on a teenager's level so their readers would understand their intend. This was the level to which they had to appeal. This was a waste.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
