Title: Social "biology" strikes again
Product review: What a mysoginistic, narrow perspective. Some of his "observations" are [very] loosely based in science, but I was offended by his sweeping observational generalizations and gross stereotypes being presented in such an authoritative manner. The uncritical reader might accept his musings as a scholarly,scientific discussion of the current body of sex and gender knowledge. However, his writing is actually a loose interpretation of others' scholarly work (whose, we don't know as the references are uncited) viewed through a very male-dominant culture-status-quo lens.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
