Title: Disappointing and Numerous Errors
Product review: To be brief, Folland has a list of errata that is three pages long on his website to correct all the mistakes he made when writing this book. On top of that, instead of using proofs that are rudimentary he chooses more clever proofs. While this is concise, it has a large pitfall since it does not correlate to other texts that are in analysis/calculus.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
