Title: totally devioid of any scientific content
Product review: Michael Behe's "Darwin's Black Box" is totally devoid of any scientific content. The concept of "irreducible complexity" is vacuous. Testifying in the "Dover" trial he said there was a test for irreducible complexity but he "would not invest the time or effort to perform it". Even Behe's own colleagues at Lehigh University (and the entire biology department) issued a statement that ID has no basis in science.Anyone still maintaining that ID and Behe's work has any credibility after the dreadful performance in Dover must be immune to any reasonable argument.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
