Title: don't be confused, bad reviewers
Product review: someone who obviously cannot add has stated that citation would have retired at 3 with a more impressive record than man o'war or secretariat. citation was a brilliant racehorse, one of the finest of all time...but he lost twice in two years, and man o'war only lost once(which can also be easily explained) in two years. horses cannot be compared against each other who have not faced each other on the track (don't forget former-plater seabiscuit beat one of the finest horses ever in war admiral, and the fastest-horse ever whirlaway also lost in a match race).citation was great, but this book isn't.actually, it is one of the worst books on thoroughbreds i have ever read (only rivalled by horses of a different color, by that dullard squires).avoid!!
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
