Title: Bad history
Product review: I treat this book as a historical document, published in 1937 it represents an example of the naive impression of the Russian revolution as seen by that generation of western writers, in this respect it reads today as sad and dated, in his epilogue he writes of USSR being prosperous and free. Either he was ignorant of collectisation, famines,GULAGs and shootings or more probably decides that denial is more comfortable.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
