Title: Inaccurate Data in this production.
Product review: The BBC production of king Lear was a good portal of Shakespeare's original except that historically inaccurate throughout the production and the lack of good actors took away from the production itself. However, I will say that David Burke as Kent and Timothy West as Gloucester fit there roles well as well as done very good acting in this production, even though surrounded be some horrible acting. Sometimes the actors couldn't be understood because they were so focused on mumblings and screaming. Then the inaccurate data such as the rubber tires on the cart, Gloucester's filling in his teeth, and the Fool's custom which was not of the period. Therefore, I didn't like this production because I myself couldn't ignore the inaccurate data, and the bad acting however the storyline itself is a good one.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
