Title: Snell Neuro = As useful as an AOL disk
Product review: I have the major Neuro books, of which Crossman (for overview) and Nolte (for detail) came out on top. Snell's Neuro was very poorly illustrated, typeography made my eyes strain, illustrations were irregularly labelled often missing out the most important aspects, text did not focus on important points, no heirarchy of importance of information. I cannot even in good conscience take someone's money to sell it second-hand, so I think I'll give it to the library. Snell Neuro was money down the drain. At least AOL disks are free.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
