Title: Debunked research
Product review: Too much of this book is bogged dow in figures that have already been debunked. I made it through the first couple of chapters and was disenchanted with how the book takes a thesis wish and uses nothing solid to prove the point. Read something by John Lott and see what true analysis of facts can reveal. I borrowed Sugarmann's book from someone who told me to keep it. "Not worth the paper it's printed on," he said. True......
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
