Title: The book is a waste of paper and time.
Product review: This book was recommended by a friend. Luckily, I found a copy locally in the bargain bin for $1.50 and even that was more than it was worth. Besides ruining what could be considered potentially good satire and comedy with the bias and commentary of your average six-year-old, the book has become an example of its title by repeating urban legends and quoting historical "facts" that are unverifiable by established sources. Considering its bias, the historical fallacies and the urban legends presented as fact, the only conclusion one can come to for supporting this book is lack of education or a simplistic and easily amused mentality. Too bad 1 is the lowest number assignable.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
