Title: Why?
Product review: On the face, this film seems to promise a lot, but in practice it it is a monument to pretension and boredom. I really find no redeeming elements anywhere. The actors seem to be in a continuous state of catatonia. I have seen my share of slow but excellent movies, for example, "Ma nuit chez Maude." Leelee Sobieski's outstanding scene is her vocal fake orgasm. I wonder whether she could do a bit of better acting, or the films she has made are consistently mediocre. Still waiting. Don't get me wrong, she is, as usual, impressibly beautiful. James Hong is the "inscrutable" Chinese! My, my, the director, Lang, should know better. A better cinematography could have made this film more palatable. I have seen better in soap operas.In essence, it was a waste of my time and money. Don't bother!
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
