Title: Lost in an unfortunately live language
Product review: oh, mr siegel, where is your editor, and why must you insist on ruining perfectly interesting characters with meaningless reflection, soporific tangents, and, the worst offense of all, tom robbins-like cutesiness. Stick to the darkness, the bottle, the raw sex-leave the clever-than-thou schtick to the wanna be modernists. What a waste
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
