Title: Gravity and Vacuum again.
Product review: The case of the literary editor versus the emminent (Gggguuffaw!!) scientist.Of course the case in question was Havermeyer versus Dunbar, where Dunbar cracked Havermeyer over the head with the candlestick in "the vacuum of space." This was why the emminent scientist was expounding on "no gravity (in the vacuum of space)."The case of Havermeyer versus Dunbar was thrown out after the judge notified the eminent scientist that the gravitational constant, G, was first measured by Henry Cavendish in 1798, and found to be -6.67*10^(-11) Newton.meter^2.kg^(-2), to which the eminent scientist responded (inexplicably), "I didn't expect the bloody Spanish inquisition."Sometimes the shortcuts in editing are preferable to what the eminent scientist meant (but have less intrinsic comedic value). I hope this clears things up. Could a literary editor make this mistake, or just an eminent scientist?
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
