Title: A misrepresented view
Product review: The author presents this book as one of fact. He has created a definition of what he feels a cult is and applied it to those groups he doesn't agree with. Rather he creates a world that is run by the definitions of man rather than God. His foundation is not from the Bible, though his studies are well into it. Rather, his views stem from the Trinitarian doctrines, created at the Nicene Council, some time after the ending of the Book of Revelations. The doctrine is impure, it would be similar for us in our day the change the Constitution in a modern assembly and declare that the new version was the framers' intent. Sadly, by the accusations and declarations of the author, the early Christian church would have been a "cult" as well.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
