Title: Flawed Pop Psycology/Pseudo-science
Product review: Save your money. This book is based on mostly anecdotal information and "subjective" tests. It starts with an assumption that girls are short-changed and sets out to "prove" it, even though all the evidence from most other objective sources reaches the opposite conclusion. In fact, the original statistical data this book is based on has been "lost", so the methodolgy cannot be objectively critiqued. If you need ammunition for your agenda, then get this book. But beware: you may have your work cut out for you trying to prove this theory.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
