Title: Unfaithful and miscast version.
Product review: This is quite the worst "Hound of the Baskervilles" I have seen. It is nothing new to deviate from the Conan-Doyle story and although this doesn't do so often, it does it in pointless and unnecessary ways. The worst feature, however, is the miscasting of Holmes, who is so wooden he hardly registers at all, and Watson who is completely alien to Conan-Doyle's creation and dominates throughout as if he was the main character.If this is an attempt to de-construct the Holmes story you can keep it.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
