Title: "Scientific" evidence
Product review: Overall I was disappointed with this book. I find some of the ideas interesting but I found mistakes concerning scienctific theories and major flaws in the research. For example when the author is discussing the birth of Christ he mentions that all the genetic information needed for the blood of the baby comes from the father. This is incorrect. These types of errors probably stem from the fact that many scientific articles listed in the bibliography are substancially out of date. I basically feel that most of the "scientific" evidence mentioned in this book is circumstancial and needs further investigation.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
