Title: A flawed foundation leads to a flawed conclusion at best.
Product review: After finishing the first half of the book (chapters 1-4 out of 8) I decided not to invest any more time in it. For me the bible is not a book of myths as the author repeatedly says. I see it as a book of history--a book of facts recorded for our benefit. The entire first half of the book repeatedly refers to the bible as a book of myths and then draws its conclusions based on that position. The foundation is flawed and so I have very little confidence in the accuracy of the author's conclusions.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
