Title: ahem
Product review: Amazon.com seems to have mangled the review I posted yesterday, cutting it off in mid-sentence and adding a period. No matter; it is the same as the one I posted February 27, 1999, for the paperback edition and can be read there. I only tried posting it here because I did not think the sycophantic drivel below ought to go unchallenged. Oh well, at least this way I get to drag that grotesque screed's average rating even lower -that is, if Amazon.com doesn't screw it up for me again.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
