Title: disappointed
Product review: www.type has a nice cover... we all know the rest. it has a few good examples of websites, a whole lot of what not to do and not much else. i really think that richard pring was more interested in slandering bad sites than collecting good ones. the book also contains quite a few badly executed 'eyecandy style' images 'designed' to demonstrate best practice. all in all it's a badly designed design book... a true 'design book for the blind'.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
