Title: Unstructured, rambling, and at times incoherent
Product review: There is a need for a discussion of the psychology of earthquakes. We need to understand how and why we think and misthink about their risk. That's not what this book is. This book is a highly personal account of the thoughts of one man who, if he knows much about the geology of earthquakes, doesn't let it show in the book. It's unstructured, rambling, and at times even incoherent. Rarely can I resell a nonfiction that I've read because of all the underlying and notation that I do, but there's nary a mark in my copy of this one. The only worthwhile parts are mildly entertaining accounts of some crackpot earthquake predictors.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
