Title: Recycling academic tradition
Product review: With the exception of Lacy's piece, this volume does nothing more than recycle decades of old perspectives on this cycle, without contributing anything fresh or of substance to understanding of it. Look to the original sources if you need to be reminded of them. There is no need to purchase brief recaps of what people have been thinking about this literature in past decades.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
