Title: Just Read the Da Vinci Code
Product review: What a joke! This book was obviously rushed into print to capitalize on the Dan Brown phenomenon, but it is nothing more than a recap of the research presented by Brown - much of which is questionable.Martin Lunn claims to be an historian, but he falls into the same traps as many of the "historians" on which Dan Brown relied for his own research, making wild leaps of logic and mortaring historical gaps with assumption and preconception.For Brown, this was fine; he was writing fiction. But Lunn claims to be telling the "truth" - a truth no one can possibly know after two millenia of obfuscation. So what Lunn ACTUALLY does is recount Dan Brown's research without all of that confusing "plot" and none of those annoying "characters". If you want to know the contents of Martin Lunn's book, read Dan Brown and at least be entertained while you do it.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
