Title: Freiday's Apology, not Barclay's
Product review: Robert Barclay's Apology for the True Christian Divinity is required reading for any serious student of historic Quakerism. Unfortunately Dean Freiday's attempt to paraphrase it in "modern English" contains so many mistakes that there is no point in using it for anything except the footnotes (which do sometimes provide useful background information about earlier authors whom Barclay cites). The way to understand Barclay is to read an unaltered text of his original wording...
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
