Title: dangerous
Product review: the author insists, so far as I can tell, that the only way to write a decent novel is based on some Aristotelean idea of the 'premise' which cannot be violated. 'Love leads to death' is an example for a character who dies as a result of being in love. This is nothing but an obscene simplification of the plot. It's absurdly reductionist.maximum capacity? A character's dialogue should always be the best thing he could say. What nonsense. How about the mistake, a common factor of life?Some good points on dialogue, though, but not worth the book.I think you could write a good novel with this book, but I think it would hobble a certain type of writer severely.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
