Title: it's only 'thought' if vincent says so
Product review: this is a rather interesting book, but the writer hardly practices what he preaches about objective thinking. there are also instances in the text where he lashes out at the reader to shelter his ego. this latent hostility disguised as a scholarly publication enforces a message: if you disagree with me, you're not only wrong, you're a jerk too.thank goodness, meanwhile, that not everybody in this world strives to develop the author's ayn rand class of thinking. the very suggestion that humans should suppress thoughts that aren't 'noble' smacks of orwell. somehow, fortunately, the human animal never caught on to being stony and emotionless. did the author ever consider that passion might actually be a valuable survival tool to the human animal?it's an okay text to get your mind busy, but it's the wrong one to turn to for creative or objective thinking.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
