Title: I gave it two stars because it isn't horribly written
Product review: It is, however, terribly inaccurate. Irreducible complexity is his main argument. He spends a few hundred pages trying to establish examples of irreducible complexity in nature. To the uninitiated he seems to do a good job of this. Unfortunately for him he is wrong. His examples are not irreducible he just couldn't figure out how to reduce them to simpler systems. The eye, the explosive beetle, blood clotting are all reducible. Even the mouse trap (his greatest example of irreducible complexity) is reducible! Read it like you read a Rush Limbaugh book and laugh at the absurd claims.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
