Title: In vain
Product review: I do not recommend the book because it's not what it says it is: a history of the Church and the Jews.The book is really two books. The first is Carroll's interminable autobiography: why he hates his father, the church, etc. The second is his dream of a church that will replace the Catholic Church, which he now despises. His church's purpose seems to be the celebration of "the sanctity of democracy." No moral rules, no hierarchy, no revelation, no redemption. Just Unitarianism Lite.The pseudo-history is concocted to suit his bitterness and his little theological dream. How could any reader take this bizarre history seriously? But clearly thousands havve. How sad.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
