Title: Unconvincing propaganda
Product review: What to say about this film but that the intentions were clear, unambiguous, and that's the problem. At least Michael Moore brings some evidence to his arguments. Here Fahrenhype brings opinions supported by... other opinions... It is disorganized propaganda at best, unconvincing because they do not support their arguments with facts. Pressed about the lack of WMD in Iraq, former Mayor Ed Koch claims that he would have supported the war even if he had known that there was no WMD, but why is not clear. Because Sadam Hussein was a bad boy? In which case we should be waging war in 30 countries just now! The most compelling arguments in this movie are from individuals who were portrayed in a light contrary to their wishes in Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11. Granted. But for the rest, even the Pet Goat episode, it does remain unconvincing. Talking heads do not make up for missing facts (or missing WMDs).
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
