Title: bizzare...
Product review: My big problem with this book is the material that Dan Kennedy added. While it provides useful background and some updated examples, Kennedy weaves it in seemlessly into the old material. What you get is confusion. The first person of Kennedy is mixed in with the first person of Maltz, without being differentiated in any way! So in the same section, you have someone speaking of "my patients" in the '40's or '50's, and then the same voice speaking of "my experiences" with a Kevin Costner movie or a Michael Jordan anecdote. There is no change in typeface, or paragraph structure to indicate that different people are writing, one long-dead, the other alive and "editing" this book. Why didn't Kennedy's editor make him place his commentary separately?This was enough to spoil most of the usefulness of this edition for me. I suggest noting the boxed exercises that Kennedy includes, which are useful, and then reading the original of the book.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
