Title: Slanted at best
Product review: The author provides a great example of a Fallacy of Composition argument. An equivalent book on pet ownership would be "Stop risking your life on dogs: Cats - The Smart Alternative." This book would then proceed to describe the dangers of owning pit pulls based on real statistics. No mention of low-cost houses (Vanguard, TIAA-CREF, Fidelity) or ETFs, just as no mention of cocker spaniels or poodles in his "no dogs" book. I guess if you sell managed accounts or cats for a living, this is good marketing.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
