Title: A MODERN-DAY SIC ET NON
Product review: A thorough-going piece of scholarship. Many of the criticisms of this book (and I'd recommend getting "Forbidden Archeology's Impact" along with this work) have read as if Cremo and Thompson are advocating some kind of "creationist" alternative to Darwinism. They aren't. What the book does do is show the logical and rhetorical inconsistencies in the current mainstream view. A veritable modern-day "Sic et Non."
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
