Title: It's a useful encyclopedia of atheistic philosophical errors
Product review: Michael Martin's book is very useful as an encyclopedic catalog of atheistic arguments (positive and negative) against the existence of God. However, contra the gentleman from Germany, most of Granger's points are salient and true. Martin completely misunderstands the Kalam Cosmological Argument, primarily by confusing labeling and enumeration (!), and his attempt to revive the hopelessly falsified Verification Principle as a special-pleading stick to beat religion with does no credit to his intellectual honesty. If I were compelled to recommend the best atheistic treatment of the philosophy of religion, it would still be Mackie's MIRACLE OF THEISM.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
