Title: Science Apartheid
Product review: Despite my interests in history as it relates to science (and more specifically to medicine), I found this work to be sorely tedious. Nonetheless, it would have been redeemable had there been useful organization, instead wondering almost aimlessly among events not much better arranged than a high school term paper. The frequency of repetition also taxed my patience heavily. The irony of the epilogue leaving potential credibility for Linus Pauling's work with high-dose vitamin C in same way he criticized other charlatans' benefactors shouldn't be lost on the reader, but it's more likely the difficult delivery will discourage any reader from getting that far who isn't already heavily invested in evidence-based science. This certainly won't be the work that invites the lay public to be interested in science.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
