Title: To Kill A King; Worst Film Ever Made?
Product review: "To Kill a King" is a shocking collection of lies painted as historical fact. It is clearly the brain child of some deranged Royalist alarmed at the rise of democracy. The dialogue is poorly constructed with far too many longeurs. The idea that Oliver Cromwell was Fairfax's second fiddle, sucking up to him in order to get close to his wife, is such utter drivel as to make this film unwatchable. The Royalists behind this film end up by saying that there were no republics until the death of Louis XVI in 1793. Err... the United States perhaps? A land freed from the tyranny of monarchy by the grandchildren of the Roundheads. Those same Roundheads who had fled the Restoration after Charles II was restored in Monck's military coup of January 1660. This film is just too bad to bother watching.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
