Title: Now famous with 'New Scientist' magazine
Product review: in their Feedback section, a place where dubious claims are highlighted. (Vol 199:2666, p.56) For those of you who actually paid $500 for this, I feel sorry for you because you just got duped. This is a digital signal. End of story. The claims about this are snake oil. If you believe this nonsense I've got this bridge I want to sell you in new York for a great price.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
