Title: 'same old same old'
Product review: The only thing new here is the author's name. This book pitches the 'same old same old' from a new kid on the block. The one star I'm giving this book is for the forward by Steven Pinker. The rest of this book is unfocused and the argument is inconsistent. The stories of students are stiff. It's obvious this author doesn't know many children. This makes the reader question the integrity of the research presented.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
