Title: Another professor's book
Product review: I elected to read this for two reasons: First, it was said to be the seminal work on Libertarian philosophy; and, second, it was supposedly the intellectual response to John Rawls, for whose writings I have very negative views. I was able to get through a very few pages when it became apparent that Nozick and Rawls are a matched set--they just have a philosophical difference. But both of them write only to impress, as do far too many Harvard professors.I try to think of the reader who might like this book. So far I can't come up with one, with the possible exception of someone trying to understand Rawls. It's easier, and just as educational, to just give up on Rawls and look elsewhere for Libertarian material.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
