Title: Only interesting from standpoint of background shots
Product review: I lived during during the 1960s and was in NYC from time to time. So consequently the outside film shots were somewhat interesting, but the tedious boredom of "Holzman's" life (doesn't matter it is faux) is draining as a viewer. I enjoy documentaries (faux or not) and this is very shabby compared to so many other films. I could not endure it to view it more than once and the 74 original minutes was about my limit. My video did include the last part (which was somewhat interesting except you wonder if this is a mockumentary, why does he have the beginning of the movie after he was robbed?). Ah, questions, questions, questions, is that the only thing that this video does for the viewer?
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
