Title: Good grief...
Product review: Being the very pro-Second Amendment person that I am, it was impossible for me to like this book. There is a lot of false or slanted information in here, and the stastics are obviously biased. But the one main thing that turned me off of this book is his stance on the Second Amendment. He states that it applies only to states having the right to a militia. All of the other amendments in the Bill of Rights (free speech, freedom of religion, etc.) use the same language and are always interpreted to mean individual freedom, not state freedom. What makes this man think that the founding fathers would mean something different when they say that we have the right to keep and bear arms? This book gives no consideration to the arguments against gun control or to its proven lack of effectiveness.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
