Title: Sloppy - Hobby Historian
Product review: Sloppy history --- with basic inaccuracies such as those cited by the 5 star reviewer (???), how can the analysis be trusted as sound? Dissapointing book all around. When one sets out to challenge (dare I say "revise") history, and Taylor is the revisionist here, one would expect better all around scholarship. Even from its promotional "Editorial Review" - the book is designed to stir controversy rather than add to serious historical scholarship.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
