Title: What factual evidence?
Product review: Although this book is easy to read, I was unimpressed by the lack of REAL, factual evidence. The Da Vinci Code is a work of fiction, and this book tries to poke the many holes in THAT dreadful work of art. But how do you refute a work of fiction by using the same source? What I mean is, the Da Vinci code is basically saying the Bible does not tell the whole story. Ok, fine, but how is Bock's book going to refute Brown's work by using the Bible and scriptures as it's main source? The Bible is what they are arguing, so you cannot use the source of the problem as the answer. They are like two children saying "Did not!", "Did to!", and so on. It's just poor research. I want different proof.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
