Title: Transparently Bogus Faux-Scholarship
Product review: Banks is incapable of writing a coherent sentence or formulating a coherent argument. For some reason or other, at some point in his life he either subscribed or pretended to subscribe to the dumbed-down Gramscianism taught in Ed-schools and decided to write books regurgitating left-wing theories which he barely understands, misrepresenting them, and then misrepresenting (and failing to comprehend) the views of any whith whom he disagrees. He constantly produces false choices, non-sequiters, and even gets basic facts wrong. The result is incomprehensible, meaningless gobbledegook that no one should read except as a study on the fatuity and illegitimacy of the education academy.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
