Title: Academically This Book Never Should Have Found a Publisher
Product review: Greene's methodology is horrible. The entire book is based on a strawman. He creates "myths" which he himself puts into words and defines. This makes it simple for him to prove them wrong, even when there's no evidence that the Common Man actually subscribes to these myths.His definitions for the myths and how to find them true are false are tautological. They are worded in ways so that the outcome is already assured. I am unsure how the first draft of this ever made it past an editor.Regardless of whether you want these myths to be "true" or "false," please find the answers in a better written and more credible source than this.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
