Title: Well intentioned and intriguing, but deeply flawed
Product review: I was deeply disappointed in this book. While it was obviously well-intentioned (and brought up challenging and intriguing ideas), it was so ill written that I could hardly bring myself to finish it. Wolf overgeneralized to such a degree that I couldn't take her seriously. Though the central idea is interesting, I had a hard time finding it at first. The writing was disappointing -- full of illogical leaps and implied causality. (I have to wonder if Wolf has ever taken a critical writing course. It would certainly be of use to her.) To be honest, this book looked like a very promising first rough draft that accidentally made it into print. In my opinion, this book could have used some serious editing and re-writing before it ever saw print. I would reccommend this book only on the condition that one reads for concepts (which Wolf has in abundance) and not for proof or argumentation (which this book utterly lacks).
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
