Title: A Train to Farfetchedka
Product review: Readers of Mike Ramsdell's book A Train to Potevka are given a curiously worded disclaimer in the prologue. "It would have been impossible to write this book," Ramsdell says, "and not have the liberty to create dialogue, description, and detail in order to make the story more readable and enjoyable. Thus...several of the events, dates, places, and names in the book have been altered or fictionalized." Altered, OK. But fictionalized? That would explain why this book does not have the faintest ring of truth to it, but it doesn't give Ramsdell justification for passing this story off as anything other than pure fiction. The book is a poorly written, simplistic tale that only the most gullible reader will believe.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
