Title: Nigel Davies: Please! stop writing opening books!
Product review: lets summarize the technique:-get all the grunfeld books-review the main lines and what kasparov and kramnik are playing-make few conclusive or thoughtful statements-when you do make a statement, give very vague varaiations so people are left wondering, did he really think this was okay or did he miss this move?specific variations: 7.bc4 in the exchange variation after 7...c5 8.ne2 nc6 9.be3 0-0 davies forgets 10.Rc1 and only lists 10.0-0 for white, not even mentioning the h4 idea.I could list probably five more without thinking, but its not worth the time.It may be the newest book, but dont bother, get rowsons book, he at least thinks before he writes.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
