Title: He was convicted again.
Product review: This non-fiction book, written by a convicted murderer, claims that he was innocent, framed for the crime, and wrongully convicted by a corrupt justice system. The story concludes with a judge ordering his release and a new trial. The book ends there. However, I did some research in the legal databases (Westlaw), and discovered that after the book was published, he was convicted at his new trial, and the additional evidence and testimony at the new trial seemed to confirm that he did, in fact, commit the crime. His conviction was affirmed on appeal.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
