Title: Postscript to the review from Minneapolis
Product review: I would like to correct an error in my earlier review of "The Verdict of History Sacco and Vanzetti." In my eagerness to get out some information about this book, I unforgivably submitted the review when I was only 80% through the book. Dr. D'Alessandro does include a chapter which refutes points made by "guilty" authors like Montgomery and Russell. In fact, this is probably the most effective section of the book although it does, in my opinion, suffer somewhat from illogic and lack of focus. Also, the backward references are hard to follow because the book has no index. However, I apologize for my mistake.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
