Title: Poorly written; to be avioded
Product review: This book has been used as the text for an undergrad analysis class at Stanford for a number of years. It is overly verbose, poorly organized, and terribly written. The language is imprecise, and relies too much on intuition than solid reasoning. Furthermore, the proofs often lack elegance.A much better text is Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis. Concise and eleganty written. The language is precise, and the proofs are often full of beautiful and clever ideas.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
