Title: not talmud torah but feminist agenda, argued poorly
Product review: It would be really nice if she spent time with actual analysis of the material, rather than repeatedly whacking the reader over the head with her feminist agenda. I mean, I'm an Ortho Jewish feminist myself, but I don't feel like I need to read between the lines and infer all manner of evidence that the ancient sages are so liberal and woman-huggy at every turn. Hello, context? Hello, sparing use of the argument-from-silence? Logic? Ack. Her book about the Jerusalem Talmud was just as bad...one approaches the Talmud to learn Torah from it, not to paint one's agenda onto it.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
