Title: Over A Thousand Pages And All Some People Can Do Is Complain About References To Burr?
Product review: This is a monumental and fantastic work. It gives new definition to the word "comprehensive". Yet, despite being a landmark publication, all some reviewers of this book can offer up for criticism is a long, rambling, impertinent rant about their petty disagreement with how Aaron Burr was portrayed. I would contend that if the only issues one had with a 1000 page book is something so subjective as the PERCEIVED bias the author had towards a controversial figure, then the book was a roaring success! Might I suggest: "get a life" to those who cannot look past their own ridiculous little pet peeves, and judge the book on it's own merit. The title of this book wasn't "The Role of Aaron Burr in New York History"! But then again, nobody else took this ridiculous review seriously, according to their feedback.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
