Title: An interesting and lively examination of the NWT
Product review: The book covers the major areas of criticisms aimed at JWs with regard to the trinitarian doctrine and the NWT. The level of research from other non-JW sources is astounding. The defence is thorough, clear, and concise. The most interesting point that Greg Stafford raises implicitly and needs clarification from the major JW critics is for them to state acceptable Bible translations and which one each critic recommends and reasons for this choice. An area for further research would be the historic background and motivation of the major bible transalations available today. It should cover the religious organisation, if any, that the members of a translation committee belong to and the doctrinal beliefs that it adheres to. This would then tackle in more depth if bias exists in other translations.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
