Title: A waste of time.
Product review: Haining claims to have discovered documentation that proves the existence of The Demon Barber of Fleet Street during the late 1700s - early 1800s. Unfortunately, nowhere in the book does he cite his references or make clear exactly where he found this documentation. Without this vital information, it's difficult to accept Haining's claim that Sweeney Todd actually existed. The book is a work of fiction and should be marketed as such.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
