Title: There's a word for this.
Product review: It's called "post hoc ergo propter hoc," and it's an example of the fallacy of believing that things are the way they are because they're supposed to be this way, when they're really this way only because they can be this way and they don't happen to be any other way.The fact is, in any population of tens of millions of investors, many will go broke, but many will get rich, due to simple random-walk statistics applied to random fluctuations of the markets.The best ten bucks you make this year may be the ten you keep by not buying this book.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
