Title: Even worse
Product review: John Carpenter's original "The Fog" was pretty tepid in comparison not only to his other work, but other horror films of that era.This remake is just plain boring. Back in the late seventies and early eighties, horror movies could get away with waiting awhile to make with the scares, as long as there was a good opening shot to give something for people to look forward to. This movie doesn't have ANYTHING for the first half of the story, and this is 2005. Today's horror audience doesn't have the patience that they did in 1980, and this sucker would've gotten walked out on then.How did this movie even get funded? Did anybody actually read the script before they started shooting? I find it hard to believe that even the B-listers involved here would have willingly lended their talents to such a lackluster dog of a horror movie, especially knowing that it was a remake of something that wasn't too spectacular in the first place.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
