Title: Poor source of information
Product review: I was disappointed in Olson's research. Much of the information included was later found to be false. I could go on to say the book is biased, but that is made obvious merely by examining Olson's own political believes. My review is biased too, and I am likely revealing my own beliefs, but I am not a journalist or a professional writer by any means. I rely on journalists to give me valid and confirmed information. Spreading rumors as facts not only puts her in the same camp with the tabloids, but increasingly the same camp as many in the popular media. Of course, she's had months to confirm her facts and hasn't.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
