Title: Another academic dinosaur attempts to jump on the bandwagon.
Product review: A pathetic attempt to gain by denouncing something that is beyond the rigid mind. Carlos books have been read at different levels by different groups of people since the sixties, often as a map of the unknown some of us dared to tread. I myself am a frequent reader of Castaneda's works, gaining valuable insight into the unknown aspects of existance with each read. That is a mark of truly great work of art. That will not dim. Unlike this opportunistic piece of garbage that is destimed to fade into the twilight zone reserved for armchair critics. Fikes anthopology amounts to an observance of a group of people with pretence at impartiality. No way can any one understand the depths of a culture by studying it. The nature of observing and studing inevitably leads to a biased view. Only by immersing in a culture can one know and experience it.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
