Title: Elitist reviews show why reading AS&U is important
Product review: After reading AS&U twice, as well as, A Theory of Justice, I find it interesting how people's opinions are suppose to carry weight by their philosophical backgrounds. Personally, I think the combo of AS&U along with A Theory of Justice is intellectually stimulating. I would NOT recommend reading one without the other unless you are looking for a famous philosopher to quote therefore building credit for your own views. I lean more towards the libertarian views but I do not let that get in the way of a quality book like Rawl's. I also find it amusing that reviewers that are students of philosophy actually suggest that one author is right and one is wrong. The real argument is about the basis for Nozick's and Rawl's views. An argument is easily won if the author defines the problem.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
