Title: A review
Product review: I think it rather humorous that the August 13th reviewer has the gumption to ground his authority on AS&U on a college course s/he took as a junior. In the words of the August 9th reviewer, "Ooh, convincing." Take it from someone who has a degree in philosophy from UC Berkeley: the critical assessments by the Aug. 9th reviewer are for the most part accurate, though by no means a complete list of the faults of Nozick. The reason I give the book two stars instead of one is that the Aug. 13th reviewer was right about one thing. AS&U is a very necessary book in the ongoing debates of political philosophy. It shows us what not to believe and why.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
