Title: Poor Science
Product review: Behe shows his limited knowledge of modern evolutionary theory and totally forgets to speak of natural history, ecology, developmental biology and heterochrony.He argues that since we didn't find all the answers, we can't find them in the future, so the Creator must be responsible for all that we don't understand yet. A century ago no one believed that the continents move, but now everybody takes it for granted today. Next century, Behe's arguments (and Denton's too) will be shown to be ridicule.People without proper knowledge of the science involved should'nt take Behe's arguments for granted. They're is more to it than what is presented. See the new discovery about the origin of ARNt and the new hypothesis about the first eukaryotes (both in Nature magazine) as well as the results of experiments recreation in laboratory of deep-sea vents and the new findings of the metabolism that goes on in those sulfurous, hot waters. Life could very well have started ther (Earth magazine, jan. 98).
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
