Title: interesting story not so interestingly written
Product review: While the story Julie Gregory tells is certainly interesting, she could have used the help of a strong editor to improve her writing. Her shifting verb tenses and clichéd healing terminology only weaken the impact of her tale. Should this kind of book, written to help others and to attain some kind of catharsis for its author, be judged on its literary merit? Maybe not as the sole criteria, but I found myself distracted by poor writing. This book could have benefited from a more straightforward storytelling approach.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
