Title: As "scientific" as astrology
Product review: Michael Behe claims that Intelligent Design is a scientific theory, by his own definition of "scientific".However, under oath on the witness stand in Kitzmiller v. Dover (2005), Behe admitted that by his definition, ASTROLOGY is also a "scientific theory".So why pay for this book, when you could turn to your newspaper's horoscopes and get something just as "scientific" at a much lower price?
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
