Title: Moonie Science or Scientific Moonieism?
Product review: Wells is on record as saying that he went back to school to destroy Darwinism for "the Father" (Rev. Moon). The theme of the book is that evolution is wrong because the author can pick flaws in high school text books. More often than not these "flaws" are distortions by Wells rather than genuine errors. Using the same logic, we might say the earth is flat because there are bad high school geography books in circulation.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
