Title: A confused look at evolution.
Product review: For anyone interested in the creation/evolution debate, this books pretty much sums up the best creationists can do against evolution. While Johnson does not argue FOR creationism, it is pretty clear that he has that (or some form of it) in the back of his mind. Most of the issues he nitpicks are irrelevant, unresolved, or unimportant. His argument is above average for creationists - but goes nowhere in counteracting the arguments for natural selection and evolution
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
