Title: Great disappointment
Product review: As a fan of the Harry Bosch series, I thought a nonfiction background would prove interesting. Like other reader-reviewers, and unlike professional book reviewers, I concur with the former. This is a rehash of newspaper articles without cohesion or explanation. Much more intriguing would have been pointing out how unusual points in a case might lead to a fictional account. In spite of my interest in crime stories, I grew bored, frustrated with repetition, and decided to quit reading well before the end of the book. I wonder why professional reviewers thought the book was so great?
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
