Title: Bad security and bad decisions
Product review: I was on the site during the big battle in the book, when Etherington insisted on staying to negotiate with insurgents who weren't interested in negotiating but were buying time to dig in around us. In fact, they were looking for hostages, preferably American. The CPA compound was renovated at an expense of $20,000,000 but that did not include fortifications for the river bank because the governor liked the view of the river. When the compound was surrounded by hundreds of insurgents on April 6th, that exposed flank made it possible to shell the compound at will.I could go on but there's steam coming out of my ears right now and I shouldn't write under those conditions.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
