Title: Unreliable sources, Wild conclusions
Product review: Mellen was clearly a Garrison fan when she started this project, and thus it's not surprising that she found a lot of "evidence" to vindicate his theories.But in doing so she had to use unreliable witnesses and phantom documents, and to accept a bunch of factoids.http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/mellen.htm
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
