Title: A shoddy case
Product review: Johnson's a lawyer, so what is he doing trying to pass himself off as any kind of authority on biology? He presents arguments that look good on the surface but fall apart under close examination. And in more than a few instances, he ignores evidence so he can claim there is none. A dishonest book from a man out of his league.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
