Title: Close to pseudoscience
Product review: This book was very disappointing. It attempts to use science to prove the existence of god. It reminds me of the archaic belief of Descartes that the soul intersects the brain at the pinneal gland in the brain. There are some questionable interpretations of SPECT scans but I'm not expert here but I had hoped for more scienctific detail. Where were the controls? This is not science.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
