Title: Why stirring lowly emotion by a vile illusion?
Product review: Ms. Chang's book consists of the 4th and the 5th class source documents only and there is NONE of proofs of the incidents displayed in this book. It is quite amazing some "professional readers" can give this high marks. Nanking was not a forgotten holocaust but a rejected illusion among several Western reporters (including Mr. Rabe). Who rejected it? The contemporary Chinese authority did for a decade following the incident and that is all what the history tells on the 1st class source documents (in English as well).
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
