Title: The content is fine, the editor needs to do some research.
Product review: This collection of tales covers the globe and contains some delightful stories that explain the origins of things, but I would have appreciated tighter editing and better research on the part of the "author". I found two glaring mistakes: In one tale, Aphrodite, a member of the Greek pantheon, and Jupiter, a member of the Roman pantheon, both play parts. As one who studied the Greek Classics extensively, this mistake stands out as a whopper. In the introduction to the very next story, he mentions Uncle Remus as a source for African tales told by slaves, but since Uncle Remus is a fictional character, I question whether this editor's other works have any credibility whatsoever. The tales are fine, the compiler needs to go back to school.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
