Title: Simplistic, incorrect advice in a pretentious form
Product review: This book is full of bad advice that unfortunately will be adopted by an ignorant and unsuspecting public. It is a sloppy piece of work with neither a consistent style (now rules-for-rules'-sake, now anything-goes) nor an apparent purpose other than the author's self-aggrandisement.One wonders from the author's petulant attempts at humour whether her title is intended to be tongue-in-cheek. But there is no indication of that in the text. _Woe is me (thee, him, her, it, us, you, them)_ is correct; *_Woe is I_ is not. This construction is left over from the days when English distinguished the dative from the accusative and authors of grammars knew what case was.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
