Title: Civ 2 was better
Product review: Civ 2 was a much more fun game to play. Civ3 puts too much emphasis on resources. If you can't find iron, you're basically [in trouble]. Sure, its more realistic, but how would you like to the ruler of Papua New Guinea and try to build a space ship without iron?
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
