Title: The metaphoric marriage of Hellenistic to mystical theology
Product review: Underhill does not recognize or understand the difference between the realism of the mystical theology of Paul and the Hellenistic mythical religions,although the difference is fundamental. The stoic idea of a natural and unmediated being in God are but folly and presumption,there is no homogenious humanity,but only various catagories of men predestinated,elected to enter into a relationship with God,in(through)Christ.Her book is a metaphoric attempt to merge Christianity to Hellenistic Myth religions.I recommend,the Mysticism of Paul the apostle,by Albert Schweitzer for he clearly explains the difference between Hellenism and Christian Mystical Theology.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
