Title: Clever, not substantive
Product review: McCrea does a better job than Irvin Matus (Shakespeare In Fact), but, in the final analysis, McCrea lacks depth, depends upon well-worn foundational assumptions that he uncritically accepts, and introduces a good deal of his own conjecture to solve long-standing problems with the Stratfordian Tradition.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
