Title: Politics isn't the problem; half-assedness is
Product review: I take the title from one of my former students, who offered the term as an apology for work that wasn't up to standards. This isn't either.Woods can make people happy by spouting cant, but it isn't history. I don't mind the cartoon conclusions. I do mind leaving most of the evidence out. Incidentally, citing other writers whose ideas are cribbed is also a nice idea.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
