Title: Not the best book on this subject
Product review: Others have already said it better than I can, so I'll be brief. There's far too much "Starkey" in this book and far too little history. His unprofessional habit of attacking other historians undermined his credibility and too many of his conclusions are unsupported. I could have passed on this weak presentation of an already well-covered subject.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
