Title: Does St. Martin's even staff copy editors?
Product review: This terrible book, in addition to being disparaging and staggeringly less than exhaustive, appears to have been both written and edited by people with no more than a third-grade education. Ever heard of a comma? The authors of this book sure haven't. As much as I love Dusty (or more accurately, BECAUSE I love Dusty), I couldn't make it more than halfway through this trash. Wickham, Valentine and anyone involved in the editing and publishing of this book are obviously both superficial and illiterate.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
