Title: Textbook thinking
Product review: Topic-wise this book is fascinating. Unfortunately it reads like a very monotonous textbook.Example: "Practicalist reject a recurrent philosophical fantasy of finding a langage free from the limits of any language in which to speak of the limits of all language. Limit and perspective are intrinsic to language and to thought, not a deficiency of them. In particular, practicalists have been suspicious of attributing to science a priviledged relation to reality and making scientific knowledge the paradigm of intellectual accountability against which all other ways of knowing are tested.(pg. 15)"Not for light reading.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
