Title: Poor writing, bad editing, no plot
Product review: The nicest thing anyone could say about this book is that it give hope for those who think a second grade education and an IQ equal to their sock size is all it takes to become a published author. Poorly written, with equally poor editing (you'd think they could at least use spell check), and absolutely no discernible plot other that an opportunity to display an ignorant, pseudoscientific use of footnotes, the prime value of this book is an opportunity to practice proof marks.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
