Title: A good idea gone horribly astray
Product review: Many prior authors have developed methods for comparing the performance of very different players. Unfortunately, Mr. Hoban doesn't seem to have learned from any of his predecessors. The methodology which underlies his ratings seems almost random, or else designed to reward some of his favorite players. As analysis, it fails; as simple writing, it's not much better.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
