Title: Indecipherable
Product review: I had the misfortune of taking civil procedure with Professor Whitten in 1991, while a second year law student at Creighton. Instead of writing a concise book designed to equip a potential lawyer for the day to day uses of the Rules of Civil Procedure, Whitten wrote a tome, filled with obscure arguments about subjects that rarely come up. It would appear that this book was written for other law professors, not law students.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
