Title: The book is badly written and has huge gaps.
Product review: Prospective readers should heed the following warnings:(1) The term "cellular" is used here in the restrictive sense that excludes the PCS band.(2) The author may know his subject, but his grasp of English grammar and syntax is pathetic.(3) Much of the material piled together here was already obsolete in the first edition, let alone the second.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
