Title: Why stirring lowly emotion by a vile illusion?
Product review: Ms. Chang's book consists of the 4th and the 5th class sourcedocuments only and there is NONE of proofs of the incidents displayedin this book. It is quite amazing some "professional readers" can give this high marks. Nanking was not a forgotten holocaust but a rejected illusion among several Western reporters (including Mr. Rabe). Who rejected it? The contemporary Chinese authority did for a decade following the incident and that is all what the history tells on the 1st class source documents(in English as well). I am a Japanese and love and respect Chinese classics, but Ms. Chang's book doesn't inspire any particle of the greatness of them. Where is common sense gone? It is rather painful to see some can be swayed by this kind of lowly emotion so easily.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
