Title: more of serafini's hard-hitting journalism
Product review: In this work Serafini maintains his reputation for tough-minded journalism, pretty much making hash of Pauling's admittedly sometimes over-hyped reputation. The problem I find with it however is that it is a little too soft on Paulings science; after all the man did do some revolutionary work. Also, while generally well-written it is marred occasionally by some awkward phrasing and repetition. But overall it is an excellent work, comparable to Tom Hager's biography of Pauling.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
