Title: Where was the *EDITOR*??
Product review: The book had some good elements -- I enjoyed the surprises, and there was some humor. BUT. The language was anachronistic, the "clues" were blatant (except to the clueless heroine) and I kept wondering why no Editor had reviewed it... or at least why the Editor had failed to remove the redundancy and gush. Was it written with "The Handy Regency-Novel Phrase-maker" in hand? In addition, the hero is simply unbelievable, and the "bickering" servants were dreadful, *not* funny.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
