Title: Not for those that don't follow Calvinistic views
Product review: While there is some decent information in this book, overall I was disappointed with it. While I don't agree with many views of those that push Dispensationalism, this book seems to spend too much time attempting to point out that Dispensationalists do not follow Calvinistic doctrine. It becomes clear that the writer is more of an arrogant Calvinist than someone who wants to present an objective perspective on Dispensationalism. Starts out decent, and then raises flags with it's agreement to strict Calvinistic doctrine.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
