Title: Book description wrong
Product review: This is NOT the Loeb classics edition - with Smith's 1976 revised English translation facing the Latin text. It is Cyril Bailey's 1910 translation - and clearly a xeroxed version - delivered one paragraph or less per page. At least that's what I got when they sent me a "sample". I hope someone at Amazon will take note of this fact and correct the description, which seems to be the text of the first review.
Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?
