{
    "coverage": {
        "US Census": {
            "geoid": "27025",
            "name": "Chisago County",
            "state": "Minnesota"
        },
        "country": "us",
        "state": "mn",
        "county": "Chisago"
    },
    "license": "Indemnification",
    "type": "ESRI",
    "data": "http://gis.chisagocounty.us/arcgis/rest/services/GISData/MapServer/1",
    "website": "http://gis.chisagocounty.us/Link/jsfe/index.aspx"
}
{
    "coverage": {
        "US Census": {
            "geoid": "27025",
            "name": "Chisago County",
            "state": "Minnesota"
        },
        "country": "us",
        "state": "mn",
        "county": "Chisago"
    },
    "conform": {
        "type": "csv",
        "split": "ADDRESS",
        "number": "auto_number",
        "street": "auto_street",
        "city":"CITY",
        "postcode":"ZIP",
        "lon": "LONGITUDE",
        "lat": "LATITUDE"
    },
    "license": "Indemnification",
    "type": "ESRI",
    "data": "http://gis.chisagocounty.us/arcgis/rest/services/GISData/MapServer/1",
    "website": "http://gis.chisagocounty.us/Link/jsfe/index.aspx",
    "note":"Unsure if the Esri-style SRS of EPSG:103721 will work as an EPSG. Shp download has no .prj file. Omitting since Lat-Lng fields are included."
}

Add conform object for Chisago County MN
Add conform object for Chisago County MN

They also have an x and y field, but with the weird SRS I thought using the lat/longs would work better. Looks like they have several hundred addresses with no lat/long, but that's out of over 21K addresses. And without a clear EPSG for Esri's 103721 srs, not sure what the lesser evil is.