Title: A Semantics Comparison Workbench for a Concurrent, Asynchronous, Distributed Programming Language,
Abstract: A number of high-level languages and libraries have been proposed that offer
novel and simple to use abstractions for concurrent, asynchronous, and
distributed programming. The execution models that realise them, however, often
change over time---whether to improve performance, or to extend them to new
language features---potentially affecting behavioural and safety properties of
existing programs. This is exemplified by SCOOP, a message-passing approach to
concurrent object-oriented programming that has seen multiple changes proposed
and implemented, with demonstrable consequences for an idiomatic usage of its
core abstraction. We propose a semantics comparison workbench for SCOOP with
fully and semi-automatic tools for analysing and comparing the state spaces of
programs with respect to different execution models or semantics. We
demonstrate its use in checking the consistency of properties across semantics
by applying it to a set of representative programs, and highlighting a
deadlock-related discrepancy between the principal execution models of SCOOP.
Furthermore, we demonstrate the extensibility of the workbench by generalising
the formalisation of an execution model to support recently proposed extensions
for distributed programming. Our workbench is based on a modular and
parameterisable graph transformation semantics implemented in the GROOVE tool.
We discuss how graph transformations are leveraged to atomically model
intricate language abstractions, how the visual yet algebraic nature of the
model can be used to ascertain soundness, and highlight how the approach could
be applied to similar languages.