Title: A Decision Procedure for Herbrand Formulae without Skolemization,
Abstract: This paper describes a decision procedure for disjunctions of conjunctions of
anti-prenex normal forms of pure first-order logic (FOLDNFs) that do not
contain $\vee$ within the scope of quantifiers. The disjuncts of these FOLDNFs
are equivalent to prenex normal forms whose quantifier-free parts are
conjunctions of atomic and negated atomic formulae (= Herbrand formulae). In
contrast to the usual algorithms for Herbrand formulae, neither skolemization
nor unification algorithms with function symbols are applied. Instead, a
procedure is described that rests on nothing but equivalence transformations
within pure first-order logic (FOL). This procedure involves the application of
a calculus for negative normal forms (the NNF-calculus) with $A \dashv\vdash A
\wedge A$ (= $\wedge$I) as the sole rule that increases the complexity of given
FOLDNFs. The described algorithm illustrates how, in the case of Herbrand
formulae, decision problems can be solved through a systematic search for
proofs that reduce the number of applications of the rule $\wedge$I to a
minimum in the NNF-calculus. In the case of Herbrand formulae, it is even
possible to entirely abstain from applying $\wedge$I. Finally, it is shown how
the described procedure can be used within an optimized general search for
proofs of contradiction and what kind of questions arise for a
$\wedge$I-minimal proof strategy in the case of a general search for proofs of
contradiction.