World-simulation as pre-training for scalable perception
autonomous driving; computer vision; autoregressive transformer; self-supervised learning
Yes
No ethics review needed.
See weakness above.
* This paper studies an interesting problem of distilling knowledge from video world models to enhance downstream perception tasks, such as geometric and semantic understanding.
* The pertaining scheme operates on both images and outputs from foundation models (e.g., depth anything output, edge map) to capture rich visual information across multiple modalities.
* Extensive experiments are conducted to examine the scaling property of the proposed model, such as model capacity and temporal context length in autoregressive next-token prediction during pretraining.
* Results show that the pre-trained model improves downstream tasks, including LiDAR depth prediction and image semantic segmentation, across multiple datasets.
This paper introduces PerceptionLM, an end-to-end framework that uses pre-trained world models to enhance perception tasks. During pretraining, the model leverages videos and foundation model knowledge to learn a next-token prediction task on multi-modality inputs. In the fine-tuning stage, a decoder adaptor is learned to integrate discrete tokens with continuous embeddings from image encoders for dense prediction tasks. The authors perform extensive experiments to examine the scaling property of PerceptionLM in terms of model capacity and temporal context length. The authors also conduct fine-tuning experiments for downstream tasks such as LiDAR depth prediction and image semantic segmentation.
* The downstream tasks primarily involve low-level vision tasks, similar to the pre-training inputs. For example, LiDAR depth prediction in the downstream task is akin to the depth map input. However, how does the model perform on high-level vision tasks, such as detection and prediction? An interesting aspect of world models is that if they can predict the future, they may have learned the behaviour of actors in the scene. Distilling this kind of intelligence could be particularly valuable.
* This paper also lacks comparisons with other baselines. The authors should benchmark their method against state-of-the-art depth prediction and semantic segmentation methods on the dataset to assess the performance gap.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
- The paper focuses heavily on autonomous driving datasets. It would be advantageous for the authors to explore other domains, such as pretraining on general videos and fine-tuning on task-specific datasets, to provide more confidence in the model's general applicability.
- For concerns regarding the baseline and runtime/training costs, please refer to the weaknesses section.

I appreciate the authors' efforts in developing such an autoregressive pretraining model. However, the current results lack detailed comparisons with more common baselines, which prevents me from giving a higher rating.
- This paper is well-written and easy to follow.
- The proposed framework is well-motivated and coherent.
- The results look good compared to the baseline. The ablation studies are comprehensive.
The paper introduces PerceptionLM, an end-to-end framework that leverages autoregressive transformers to enhance perception tasks in autonomous driving. The main contribution of this paper is to demonstrate that pretraining using next-token prediction for world observation on large-scale driving datasets can benefit depth estimation and semantic segmentation tasks. The authors propose a token-based pretraining approach with a novel decoder adaptor for adapting discrete tokens to continuous embeddings during fine-tuning. This approach shows promising results on public benchmarks like nuScenes, nuImages, Waymo Open Dataset, and Waymo Open Motion Dataset, emphasizing scalability in terms of training compute and longer temporal context.
- The comparison to existing methods feels incomplete. While ConvNeXt is used as a baseline, there is a lack of broader context that includes other competitive models for perception tasks, especially those utilizing attention mechanisms, self-supervised pretraining, and additional modalities.
- While the authors provide a comparison with ConvNeXt for different scales, it is worth noting that the ConvNeXt baseline only utilizes a single frame and image modality, whereas the proposed method uses additional edge and depth inputs with up to eight frames. This disparity makes the comparison unfair and complicates the readers' ability to understand the real performance gain within the same computation and parameter budget for the proposed method. It would be beneficial if the authors could also discuss the training cost.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
In Table 2, PerceptionLM uses 8 frames for prediction - how many frames does the baseline ConvNeXt use?

What motivated the choice of edge detection and relative depth as auxiliary tasks during pretraining?
Were other tasks considered that might enable learning more general visual representations?

Some dataset details are missing - specifically the number of videos/sequences in the pretraining set and whether this data will be publicly available.
Comprehensive evaluation across multiple autonomous driving datasets (nuScenes, nuImages, Waymo Open, Waymo Open Motion) demonstrates broad applicability.

Thorough ablation studies examine both model scaling effects and the impact of different input modalities on depth prediction performance, providing valuable insights into the method's behavior.

The scale of pretraining is impressive, utilizing a billion-image dataset which potentially enables better generalization and robustness.

Writing is sound and well-structured.
The paper is easy to follow and the technical content is clear.
This work presents PerceptionLM, an approach that uses world simulation (next token prediction) for pretraining representations for perception tasks.
The method employs a two-stage approach: first using ViT-VQGAN tokenization for image, depth, and edge features, followed by autoregressive future prediction using a Blockwise Parallel Transformer (BPT) as the causal model.
They evaluate their pretrained representations on depth estimation and semantic segmentation tasks using a ConvNeXt-S backbone.
The model is trained on a internal billion-image dataset and evaluated across multiple autonomous driving datasets: nuScenes, nuImages, Waymo Open and the Waymo Open Motion Dataset.
The evaluation tasks (semantic segmentation and absolute depth prediction) are very similar to the pretraining tasks (edge detection and relative depth estimation).
This makes it difficult to assess if the learned representations genuinely generalize beyond the pretraining objectives.

Tables 2 and 3 only compare against ConvNeXt (the vision backbone) as a baseline.
Comparisons against specialist models or other large-scale pretrained autoregressive approaches would better contextualize the method's effectiveness.

There is a notable disconnect between the paper's motivation and evaluation.
While the introduction frames the work as advancing general perception capabilities, the evaluation is focused on segmentation and primarily depth estimation tasks in autonomous driving datasets.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
see weaknesses above
The ablation studies demonstrate the effectiveness of the author's method.

The writing is good.
This paper addresses the issue of information loss in discrete tokens by proposing a method to incorporate continuous features into discrete features, and experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach.
1.	I have some questions about the motivation of the paper. I don't believe that discrete tokens lead to significant information loss. The image is already a form of discrete representation, and this discrete representation is used in almost all computer vision tasks. If discretized tokens suffer significant information loss, it may be caused by the inappropriate length or other settings of the codebook. Can you provide more concrete evidence or examples of where discrete token representations specifically lead to information loss in your approach?

2.	There is a lack of comparison with other world model methods. Predicting the next token is a common approach in the area of world model, and many papers have addressed related topics, such as Drive-WM[1] and Vista[2]. The authors should explain how their method differs from or improves upon specific aspects of Drive-WM and Vista and the comparison with these methods is needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

3.	The experiments are primarily ablation studies, lacking comparisons with the latest methods of downstream tasks, making it unclear whether the authors' approach is state-of-the-art. A few key recent methods in depth estimation and semantic segmentation should be included as baselines.

4.	The visualization results of depth estimation and semantic segmentation (versus baselines or other sota methods) can be added to help readers understand more clearly about the advantages of the proposed method. 

[1] Driving into the Future: Multiview Visual Forecasting and Planning with World Model for Autonomous Driving.

[2] Vista: A Generalizable Driving World Model with High Fidelity and Versatile Controllability.
@inproceedings{
anonymous2024worldsimulation,
title={World-simulation as pre-training for scalable perception},
author={Anonymous},
booktitle={Submitted to The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations},
year={2024},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=dgb4rfPzaw},
note={under review}
}
Image-based autoregressive next-token prediction offers a promising avenue for developing world video simulators for autonomous driving. However, applications of these autoregressive models for common perception tasks such as geometric and semantic understanding remains under-explored, largely due to the difficulty of applying discrete token modeling to perception tasks. In this paper, we introduce PerceptionLM, an  end-to-end framework that leverages autoregressive world simulators to effectively improve Perception tasks. It consists of a token-based pretraining stage and a novel fine-tuning stage that adapts discrete tokens to continuous embeddings for perception tasks. During pretraining, we leverage the world knowledge from Segment Anything and Depth Anything through autoregressive next-token prediction to imbue the model with world knowledge from multiple vision modalities.  During fine-tuning, we propose a novel decoder adaptor to fuse discrete tokens with continuous embeddings from image encoders, which overcomes the limitations of discrete tokens. With PerceptionLM, we observe impressive scaling properties, where quality is consistently improved when providing more training compute or longer temporal context. On multiple public benchmarks including nuScenes, nuImages, Waymo Open Dataset, and Waymo Open Motion Dataset, PerceptionLM demonstrates significant performance improvements for common perception tasks such as depth estimation and semantic segmentation, highlighting its potential for scaling vision-only foundation models for autonomous driving.
I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
autonomous driving; computer vision; autoregressive transformer; self-supervised learning
I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
/pdf/f3811b201a0d351466a3e145f039be2f068b9a6c.pdf
applications to robotics, autonomy, planning
I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
World-simulation as pre-training for scalable perception
ICLR 2025 Conference Submission
ICLR.cc/2025/Conference/Submission