BLIPEE: Fast and Robust BLIP with Adversarially Trained Early Exits
Early Exits; Multimodal model
Yes
No ethics review needed.
1. The topic is too limited. The early exits issue is a good question for the existing VLM models, especially for large VLM models. The authors just implement the early exits strategy on a single BLIP model, limiting its scalability.

2. The illustrations of the proposed components are not clear. The authors should re-organize the method section for better presentation. A algorithmic pseudo-code of the entire process should also be provided.

3. The experiments are insufficient. The authors compare the efficiency of their BLIPEE with other large VLM like Flamingo, however, the authors do not apply their EE strategy to Flamingo for “plug-and-play” comparison.

4. Since the proposed method relies on additional transformer and classify layers, the authors should provide the comparison on model complexity.
1. The motivation of this paper is valuable.

2. This paper is easy to read and well-written.

3. The proposed components are reasonable.
This paper proposes a very interesting issue of early exists on existing VLM models. To achieve this goal, it introduces an adversarial training approach within a GAN-based framework. Specifically, a transformer layer is utilized to mimic the output features of original VLM, and a classifier is utilized to determine when to exist. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
1. The topic is too limited. The early exits issue is a good question for the existing VLM models, especially for large VLM models. The authors just implement the early exits strategy on a single BLIP model, limiting its scalability.

2. The illustrations of the proposed components are not clear. The authors should re-organize the method section for better presentation. A algorithmic pseudo-code of the entire process should also be provided.

3. The experiments are insufficient. The authors compare the efficiency of their BLIPEE with other large VLM like Flamingo, however, the authors do not apply their EE strategy to Flamingo for “plug-and-play” comparison.

4. Since the proposed method relies on additional transformer and classify layers, the authors should provide the comparison on model complexity.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
1. What is the speedup on hardware? Does early exit also speedup the causal self-attention (autoregressive) model?
2. What is $w_i$ in L342?
3. In Eqn (2), the last $y*$ should be $y*_{1:t-1}$?
4. Does other GAN-framework work? Such as WGAN?
* The motivation is clear; the mid-crisis and overthinking phenomenon is intriguing.
* Early exit could also provide some insights into the reasoning mechanisms of LLMs, as shown in Figure 3.
* The idea is novel; using a GAN-based method for early exit is interesting and seems effective.
The paper presents an early exit strategy for training VLMs. The key idea is to attach exits across different language model layers, with each exit consisting of a transformer layer and a classifier. The transformer layers and the classifiers are trained through a GAN-based framework such that the transformer layers generate feature representations similar to the last layer. Training consists of (1) backbone fine-tuning and (2) exit training. For exit training, a semi-supervised setup and an unsupervised setup are discussed to train the transformer layer to generate features similar to the final layers. During inference, captions are generated in an autoregressive manner. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms prior early exit methods with less computational cost.
* The motivation for backbone fine-tuning is unclear and not explained. Why not use a pre-trained backbone? Does it help early exit?
* Most of the baselines come from earlier works. The baseline from recent VLM works, such as LLaVA, miniGPT-4, etc. are missing.
* According to Tables 1 and 2, the performance improvement seems incremental. Instead of the speedup calculated from L323, what is the speedup on the hardware specify in the paper? Does actual speedup align with this calculation?

Minor issue: Citations within the text are strange, check the formatting instruction.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
1. The proposed early exit method was only tested on blip2, and other models were not tested, so the generalization abilty of the method cannot be confirmed. At the same time, the section 3.1 mentioned that the problem discussed in this paper is because Q-former generates image-grounded text embeddings. However, in the case that most VLMs do not use Q-former nowadays, is this method still applicable?
2. The paper tested VQA and caption tasks, and blip2 also tested the retrieval task. How does the method in this paper performs on the retrieval task?
3. The speedup in the article is calculated based on the number of parameters. Can it be calculated based on the actual inference time?
The key differences in this work are clear: 1) We employ adversarial training for efficient learning of EE models. 2) Our method can work under both semi-supervised and unsupervised setups by utilizing the zero-shot capabilities of the BLIP-2, while previous methods require a good amount of high-quality labeled training data, thus reducing size of training data.
An EE strategy BLIPEE for VLMs to effectively mitigate inference latency by reducing unnecessary computations. BLIPEE emulate the behaviour of the final layer at the exits through adversarial learning. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in enhancing accuracy and model robustness by mitigating overthinking and the phenomenon of mid-crisis that we highlight.
1、Confusing symbols in fig1, why Classifier N, what’s meaning of D1/D2?
2、Missing some improtant references:
[1] NEO-KD: Knowledge-Distillation-Based Adversarial Training for Robust Multi-Exit Neural Networks
[2] L. Qendro and C. Mascolo, "Towards Adversarial Robustness with Early Exit Ensembles," 2022 44th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom, 2022, pp. 313-316, doi: 10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871347.
3. Unsupervised manner is not novel, just self-labeling, but their pseudo labels are not accurate enough in general.
4. Ablation study is not enough, whether or not the proposed adversarial training is necessary?
5. Technical contributions are not enough, no matter of adversarial training or knowledge distillation are very commonly-used skills, no more new techniques are founded.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
Please address the weakness.
Some codes are provided to increase credibility of the BLIPEE network. 

Various results show the effectiveness of the BLIPEE network. The designed method can improve the inference speed while yielding high-quality outputs.

Tables and figures are clear. I can understand them easily.

Limitation section is provided to present the work comprehensively.
This paper proposes an early exit strategy to reduce the inference latency in Vision-Language Models. An adversarial training network within a GAN-based framework BLIPEE is utilized to reduce the negative impact of limited labeled training data. In the BLIPEE network, each exit contains a transformer layer and a classifier. The used input-adaptive inference mitigates the overthinking issue and increases inference speed. Experimental results show the effectiveness of the proposed BLIPEE. Authors provide anonymized source codes.
The compared methods are not state-of-the-art. The newest compared methods (OFA and Flamingo) are published in 2022. Some state-of-the-art works are required for comparison.

In Table 2, BLIPEE-V-O and BLIPEE-V-F contain more Train Params than BLIP-2 V-O and BLIP-2 V-F. Why BLIPEE-V-O and BLIPEE-V-F have higher Spd than BLIP-2 V-O and BLIP-2 V-F?

In Figure 2, "Layers" should be "Layer number".

Some references needs to be revised, such as Li et al. (2020) in Line 634-642.

Some grammatical errors, such as "P_N denote the probability score ..." in Line 215.
Early exits for multimodal models
@inproceedings{
anonymous2024blipee,
title={{BLIPEE}:  Fast and Robust {BLIP} with Adversarially Trained Early Exits},
author={Anonymous},
booktitle={Submitted to The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations},
year={2024},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=ERcGlGIM2D},
note={under review}
}
In recent years, Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown remarkable performance improvements in vision-language tasks. However, their large size poses challenges for real-world applications where inference latency is a concern. To tackle this issue, we propose employing Early Exit (EE) strategies in VLM. However, training exit classifiers in VLMs is challenging, particularly with limited labeled training data. To address this, we introduce BLIPEE, an adversarial training approach within a GAN-based framework. Here, each exit consists of a transformer layer and a classifier, and the transformer layer is adversarially trained to produce feature representations similar to the final layer, while a feature classifier serves as the discriminator. Our method focuses on performing input-adaptive inference that mitigates the overthinking issue and increases inference speed. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in enhancing accuracy and model robustness by mitigating overthinking and the phenomenon of mid-crisis that we highlight. The anonymized source code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/status/BLIPEE-3ED3.
I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Early Exits; Multimodal model
I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
/pdf/767cd62174140b6f3be32a24b988f539a00c14f5.pdf
other topics in machine learning (i.e., none of the above)
I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
BLIPEE:  Fast and Robust BLIP with Adversarially Trained Early Exits
ICLR 2025 Conference Submission
ICLR.cc/2025/Conference/Submission