A Dual-Modal Framework Utilizing Visual Prompts for Enhanced Patch Analysis
Code Generation;Domain Adaptation
Yes
Yes, Other reasons (please specify below)
N/A
N/A.
This paper first presents Image-Guided Code Patch Framework (IGCP) for patch representation learning for code analysis. Then, the authors introduce several mathematical formulations for IGCP. 

The problem is poorly introduced, the technical approach does not seem to be related and the writing looks very unnatural. While it mentions "image-guided", I do not see where image comes from and how it is related to software patches, which is also not well-defined. There are no clear connections between the problem with mathematical frameworks introduced, and how metrics such as BLEU, ROUGE come from. I think this submission is poorly written.
See above.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
What is the main purpose of Figure 1, and how does it connect to the core content of the paper?
I have limited experience in this specific domain, particularly with patch analysis in the context of code. As a result, I find it challenging to fully assess the contributions and strengths of this paper.
The paper introduces the Image-Guided Code Patch Framework (IGCP), a novel approach to patch representation learning in software development. Patch representation learning is essential for tasks like bug detection, vulnerability assessment, and code optimization. Existing methods often specialize in either predictive tasks (e.g., security patch classification) or generative tasks (e.g., automated patch description generation), leading to a trade-off between understanding and generation capabilities.

IGCP aims to bridge this gap by integrating code analysis with image processing. The framework treats code patches as probability measures on Polish spaces, providing a rigorous measure-theoretic foundation. This allows for a nuanced understanding of the probabilistic structures inherent in diverse coding domains.
In my view, the paper has some formatting issues, as all text following Section 3.5 appears to be in italics. Additionally, the description of the experimental setup is somewhat lacking, particularly in terms of metric explanations, which are difficult to follow.
Yes
No concern.
No ethics review needed.
See weakness.
Patch analysis is an important topic to study and a field where many ML techniques could potentially be explored. The authors also attempt to propose their method from a very theoretical point of view.
The authors propose the Image-Guided Code Patch Framework (IGCP) to enhance patch analysis.
I highly suspect that the whole paper is generated with some LLMs. See the following comments.

1. The presentation of the methodology is unclear and difficult to follow. After careful reading, the proposed methodology remains ambiguous and lacks coherence. The entirety of Section 3 feels like a collection of complex mathematical definitions that seem disconnected from one another, without a clear explanation of how they contribute to the overall methodology.
2. The theoretical analysis is very weak and sometimes lacks clear definition. For example, in theorem 3.1 the final claim is that "If $k$ is characteristic, then the mapping $Z \to \mu_Z$ is injective. However, commonly this claim itself serves as the definition of a kernel $k$ being characteristic. Similar situations happen at multiple other places, where the assumption is too strong to reduce the claim to some very obvious facts.
3. The paper is not clearly finished at various places. For example, in line 351, 355, 365, 368, the equations or texts after the colon is missing. This makes it very hard to comprehend what the authors wanted to express.
4. The experiment setting is very unclear, and I don't understand why all the experiment sections are italicized, making it very difficult to read. In line 428, the author states 'to evaluate the performance of IPPMF'. However, there is no mentioning of what 'IPPMF' is anywhere in the paper.
Yes
This paper seems to be purely generated by LLM.
Yes, Other reasons (please specify below)
N/A
N/A
This paper seems to be nonsensical and generated by LLM.
N/A
This paper presents a groundbreaking approach to patch representation learning through the Image-Guided Code Patch Framework (IGCP)
@inproceedings{
anonymous2024a,
title={A Dual-Modal Framework Utilizing Visual Prompts for Enhanced Patch Analysis},
author={Anonymous},
booktitle={Submitted to The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations},
year={2024},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=OXIIFZqiiN},
note={under review}
}
Patch representation learning has emerged as a crucial innovation in software development, leveraging machine learning techniques to advance software generation workflows. This approach has led to significant enhancements across various applications involving code alterations. However, existing methods often exhibit a tendency towards specialization, excelling predominantly in either predictive tasks such as security patch classification or in generative tasks like the automated creation of patch descriptions. This paper presents a groundbreaking approach to patch representation learning through the Image-Guided Code Patch Framework (IGCP), a novel architecture that bridges the gap between code analysis and image processing domains. We introduce a rigorous mathematical foundation for IGCP, leveraging measure theory, functional analysis, and information geometry to formalize the domain adaptation process in patch representation learning. The optimization dynamics of IGCP are rigorously analyzed through the lens of Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics, providing convergence guarantees in both convex and non-convex loss landscapes. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that IGCP not only achieves state-of-the-art performance in patch description generation but also exhibits remarkable domain generalization capabilities.
I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Code Generation Domain Adaptation
I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
/pdf/1fb677403e24a04567a05498d3e41309e3346813.pdf
transfer learning, meta learning, and lifelong learning
I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
A Dual-Modal Framework Utilizing Visual Prompts for Enhanced Patch Analysis
ICLR 2025 Conference Submission
ICLR.cc/2025/Conference/Submission