CPDD: Generalized Compressed Representation for Multivariate Long-term Time Series Generation
Generative Model;Deep Learning;Mode Function;Diffusion Model;Long-term Time Series
Yes
No ethics review needed.
1. CPDD divides the entire time series into N patches, which might pose a risk of disrupting critical temporal patterns at the boundaries of these patches. Could this potentially affect the model's ability to accurately capture and reproduce these dynamics?
2. How does the patch length N impact the model performance? Is there an optimal range of N?
3. Can you provide a detailed comparison of the computational complexity between CPDD and baselines? For example, a table comparing their training and inference time.
- The generative modeling approach of decomposing time series patches into mode functions presented in this paper is novel and well-positioned in the literature on time series generation, to the best of my knowledge.
- The introduction of the Time-series Patch Compression (TPC) module marks a notable innovation in time series modeling. This module provides a robust alternative to the commonly used autoencoder-based compression methods and trend-seasonality decomposition techniques. The exploration of its robustness and generalization is particularly noteworthy
- Figures 1 and 2 provide a clear illustration of the proposed approach, making the core designs easier to understand.
This paper aims to address the challenge of balancing the long-term dependencies and short-term features in time series generation and proposes a novel model named Compressed Patch Denoising Diffusion-model (CPDD). The proposed approach first employs a Time-series Patch Compression (TPC) module to decompose time series patches into mode functions, effectively capturing latent representations of both long-term and short-term features. Afterward, a diffusion-based model with a CNN backbone is designed to learn the latent distributions and generate multivariate long-term time series. Experimental results demonstrate that CPDD achieves the SOTA performance in time series generation. Furthermore,  the robustness and generalization capabilities of the TPC module are rigorously verified.
- This paper identifies high computational demands as a limitation of existing methods, but the proposed approach also employs a computationally intensive Transformer-based architecture. Therefore, a detailed analysis of the computational complexity of the proposed CPDD is essential.
- The visualizations in this paper are generally of high quality. Unifying the font size in Figure 4, especially on the left-side module, to match that of other figures would improve visual consistency and readability.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
1. How are the short-term and long-term modes decomposed from the patches?

2. What is the rationale for employing the transformer as the encoder of the diffusion model instead of using the transformer directly?
1. This paper effectively leverages a patch compression method to capture complex long-term and short-term dependencies in time series data.

2. The authors employ trend-seasonal decomposition to facilitate the diffusion model's ability to learn complex distribution shifts.
This paper presents a diffusion-based method for time series generation that integrates a patch compression module with trend-seasonal decomposition to enhance generation performance.
1. The evaluation experiments presented in the paper are insufficient to convincingly demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Specifically, more common used evaluation metrics need to be added (like MSE, MAE, .etc), and the selection of baseline methods (both the diffusion-based methods and the transformer-based methods should be compared) and datasets is not comprehensive enough to provide a robust comparison.

2. The formulation of the paper needs significant improvement; the organization and clarity of the text make it difficult to identify the key ideas and contributions. 

3. The integration of the proposed patch compression method with seasonal-trend decomposition seems to offer limited novelty, as this combination may be viewed as a relatively minor contribution to the existing body of work in this area.

4. While the paper employs a transformer as the encoder within the diffusion model, it is essential to consider the associated computational costs when making comparisons with baseline methods.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
Please refer to the Weaknesses.
1. Methodology: CPDD is a patch compression method to capture complex long-term and short-term dependencies more effectively with the diffusion model for high-quality samples generation.
2. Empirical Results: The numerical results presented in the paper are compelling, showing significant improvements over competing 
approaches in terms of generated time series quality. This empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of the proposed method.
3. Proofs: The author gives a detailed formal proof of the effectiveness of DSConv blocks' structural regularization.
This paper introduces CPDD, a method for time series generation, which addresses challenges in balance between long-term dependencies and short-term feature learning. It utilizes a patch Compressed module based on the patch mode decomposition method to obtain the latent encoding of multi-scale feature of time series. It utilizes a diffusion-based model to learn the latent distribution and decode the resulting samples, which achieves state-of-the-art performance in the generation task of multivariate long-time series with efficiency and robustness.
1.  The problem that the article aims to address is confusing; what does "balance between long-term dependencies and short-term feature learning" mean?
2. In line 25 of the article, the author mentions "efficiency." How is this demonstrated in the article? Please compare the model's memory usage and inference time.
3. In the embedding space shown in Figure 1, what do "distant" and "nearby" mean? This is quite confusing.
4. The entire CPDD process is quite confusing. please provide a specific implementation process or corresponding pseudocode?
5. In lines 340-341 of the article, the author mentions "Z: latent representation obtained from the TPC Encoder during training." Then why is there no loss term for the TPC Encoder/Decoder in Equation 16? Is CPDD an end-to-end or a two-stage process? Please provide a detailed explanation.
6. What is “L_{AFC}" in Equation 16? Is there any difference between "L_{AFC}" and "L_{ACF}"?
7. The writing issues in the article are evident, with many sentences being difficult to understand, and the challenge that article aims to address is not clearly defined.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
1.	The results of Baseline presented in Table 1 are inconsistent with the results presented in the original paper, e.g., the Discriminative Score of the Diffusion-TS model under the Sines dataset in Table 1 is 0.326, whereas it is reported as 0.006 in the original paper.In fact, the results of all Baselines in Table 1 are in significant differences. In addition, Table 1 only shows some of the metrics on the performance of time series generation, and the results of the proposed method on both Context-FID Score and Correlational Score are missing. In addition, traditional metrics for time series forecasting, such as MSE, MAE, CRPS, etc., are missing from Table 1, which results in the reader not getting a full picture of the potential limitations of CPDD.

2.	In Table 2, in the Predictive Score metric, the model with DSConv removed achieves better performance in the Sines dataset, and the model with TPC removed exhibits the best performance in the Energy dataset. The results of the ablation experiments are puzzling, which may shake the rationality of the structural design of DSConv and TPC.
The main contribution of this paper is to propose a technique that can efficiently compress and represent multivariate long-term time series data by decomposing the patches into pattern functions through which long-term dependencies and short-term features are consistently represented. Specifically, the TPC module learns generic combinations of pattern functions from patches to accommodate various patterns and enables a generic compressed representation of time series data.
This paper analyses the challenges faced in the time series generation task, including the limited ability of the proposed approach to model long-term dependencies due to cumulative errors, the high computational complexity and time overhead due to the attention mechanism, and the inability to capture both long-term global dependencies and short-term local features. Inspired by the spatial distribution of latent variables modelled by LDM, in order to achieve a balance between long-term dependencies and short-run feature learning in time-series generation tasks, it proposes the Compressed Patch Denoising Diffusion-model (CPDD), where Time-series Patch Compressed (TPC) is designed based on the block pattern decomposition method to obtain multi-scale latent representations. And the diffusion model achieves high quality multivariate long time series generation after decoding by modelling the probability distribution of potential representations.
This paper is dedicated to present a technique that can efficiently compress and model multivariate long-term time series data, which has important real-world implications. The main concerns are as follows:

1.	As a model ‘designed for multivariate long-term time series’, the main innovative structures proposed by CPDD, DSConv and TPC, do not have a structure or design aimed at establishing cross-channel connectivity. We believe that a key question is whether the proposed single channel Convolution can establish connectivity across a large number of channels, e.g., the ECL dataset of the electricity Scenarios in the time series prediction contains 321 channels and the Traffic dataset contains 862 channels. Advances in multivariate prediction methods (iTransformer[1], SAMformer[2]) have shown that proper integration of channel management strategies in time series backbones is crucial for discovering univariate dynamics and cross-variate correlations.

2.	The lack of advanced baselines leads to the inability to validate the competitiveness of the proposed CPDD. Specifically, only three baselines based on Diffusion are shown in Table 1, and among them, TimeGAN and TimeVAE are published in 2021 and 2019, respectively. The introduction of a wider range of Baselines to compare the performance of the proposed models is expected to be complemented to fully validate the effectiveness of the proposed methods. The referenced baselines can be divided into 4 parts: 1) Models based on pre-trained LLM alignment to TS, e.g. TimeLLM[3]; 2) Pre-trained foundation models on unified time series datasets from multiple domains, e.g. Timer[4], UniTime[5]; 3) Proprietary models trained and tested on specific datasets, e.g. PatchTST[6]; 4) Recent Diffusion-based temporal probabilistic prediction models, e.g. Diffuison-TS[7], mr-Diff[8]. CCPD is expected to be compared with at least one competitive model in each prediction paradigm to demonstrate the soundness of the model design. In addition, we would like to introduce more benchmarks, such as ECL and Traffic datasets with a large number of channel counts, which we believe will help to validate the promising real-world applications of the proposed models.

3.	The design of the ablation experiments in this paper is deficient. In addition to DSConv and TPC, CPDD uses other strategies such as Patch Embed and Trend-seasonal Decomposition, yet the ablation experiments presented in Table 2 do not include these structural designs. This raises our concern about the validity of DSConv and TPC.

[1] Liu, Yong et al. “iTransformer: Inverted Transformers Are Effective for Time Series Forecasting.” ICLR 2024.
[2] Ilbert, Romain et al. “SAMformer: Unlocking the Potential of Transformers in Time Series Forecasting with Sharpness-Aware Minimization and Channel-Wise Attention.” ICML 2024.
[3] Jin, Ming et al. “Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language Models.” ICLR 2024.
[4] Liu, Yong et al. “Timer: Generative Pre-trained Transformers Are Large Time Series Models.” ICML 2024.
[5] Liu, Xu et al. “UniTime: A Language-Empowered Unified Model for Cross-Domain Time Series Forecasting.” Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024.
[6] Nie, Yuqi et al. “A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformers.” ICLR 2023.
[7] Yuan, Xinyu and Yan Qiao. “Diffusion-TS: Interpretable Diffusion for General Time Series Generation.” ICLR 2024.
[8] Shen, Lifeng et al. “Multi-Resolution Diffusion Models for Time Series Forecasting.”  ICLR 2024.
We develop a novel generative framework, CPDD, specifically for long-term time series generation, exploring the cross-scale feature fusion based on the patch mode decomposition method.
@inproceedings{
anonymous2024cpdd,
title={{CPDD}: Generalized Compressed Representation for Multivariate Long-term Time Series Generation},
author={Anonymous},
booktitle={Submitted to The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations},
year={2024},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=4f4HDfbwY5},
note={under review}
}
The generation of time series has increasingly wide applications in many fields, such as electricity and energy. Generating realistic multivariate long time series is a crucial step towards making time series generative models practical, with the challenge being the balance between long-term dependencies and short-term feature learning. Towards this end, we propose a novel time series generative model named Compressed Patch Denoising Diffusion-model (CPDD). Concretely, CPDD first employs the Time-series Patch Compressed (TPC) module based on the patch mode decomposition method to obtain the latent encoding of multi-scale feature fusion. Subsequently, it utilizes a diffusion-based model to learn the latent distribution and decode the resulting samples, thereby achieving high-quality multivariate long-time series generation. Through extensive experiments, results show that CPDD achieves state-of-the-art performance in the generation task of multivariate long-time series. Furthermore, TPC also exhibits remarkable efficiency in terms of robustness and generalization in time series reconstruction.
I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Generative Model Deep Learning Mode Function Diffusion Model Long-term Time Series
I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
/pdf/7d68e361c1bb90f8f672e3abfb6ca7e4904beffe.pdf
generative models
I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
/attachment/cf82fd640d8bdd9290d694dce627efd249cf1aea.zip
CPDD: Generalized Compressed Representation for Multivariate Long-term Time Series Generation
ICLR 2025 Conference Submission
ICLR.cc/2025/Conference/Submission