Tri-Tense Former: Capturing Dynamic Traffic Flow Using Tri-Tense Attention for Traffic Forecasting
Traffic forecasting;Spatio-temporal dependency;Transformer;Contrastive learning
Yes
No ethics review needed.
Same as the weakness.
1. The paper is well-structured, facilitating clear understanding and readability.

2. The authors conduct comparative experiments on public, real-world datasets and provide a comprehensive analysis of the results.
The paper proposes the Tri-Tense Former (TTformer), a novel approach designed to enhance traffic forecasting by capturing complex spatio-temporal relationships through three specialized attention modules. TTformer categorizes traffic flow into three dimensions: past-to-present (present-perfect), present, and future, each handled by its own tense-specific attention module to model dependencies accurately. The model structures traffic data into ‘spatio-temporal blocks’ with distinct key-query pairs for each module. Furthermore, contrastive learning with a negative filtering technique is employed to handle incomplete traffic data and enhance the model’s applicability across various traffic scenarios.
1. The paper states that the tri-tense attention mechanism is motivated by leveraging complex temporal dependencies. However, prior works like DSTAGNN [1] and D2STGNN [2] have already addressed cross-time-slot dependencies across different nodes. Further discussion is needed to clarify the advantages of the proposed tri-tense attention compared to these existing models.

2. Comparative learning has been previously applied to traffic forecasting tasks, such as in [3] and [4]. It is necessary to discuss the specific advantages of their approach over these established methods.

3. The experimental evaluation is insufficient and should include more state-of-the-art baselines from the past three years. It is particularly important to compare the proposed model with those that utilize cross-time-slot spatio-temporal dependencies, such as DSTAGNN [1] and D2STGNN [2].

4. In the case study, it is important to compare the performance of the proposed model with state-of-the-art methods. Simply comparing predictions with the ground truth provides limited insights.

5. Using different shapes to represent nodes in a simple graph is unnecessary and may lead to confusion, suggesting that the graph is heterogeneous when it is homogeneous.

[1] Lan S, Ma Y, Huang W, et al. Dstagnn: Dynamic spatial-temporal aware graph neural network for traffic flow forecasting[C]//International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2022: 11906-11917.

[2] Shao Z, Zhang Z, Wei W, et al. Decoupled dynamic spatial-temporal graph neural network for traffic forecasting[J]. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2022, 15(11): 2733-2746.

[3] Ji C, Xu Y, Lu Y, et al. Contrastive Learning-Based Adaptive Graph Fusion Convolution Network With Residual-Enhanced Decomposition Strategy for Traffic Flow Forecasting[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024.

[4] Li L, Yang K, Bi J, et al. STS-CCL: Spatial-Temporal Synchronous Contextual Contrastive Learning for Urban Traffic Forecasting[C]//ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024: 6705-6709.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
1.	Given that each node is primarily associated with others in close geographical proximity or with similar functions, the Present Attention module and Present-Perfect Attention module calculate interactions between each node and all other nodes without utilizing a predefined or adaptive adjacency matrix. Does this approach potentially introduce excessive irrelevant information?
2.	Road 48 leads toward Dodger Stadium, while Road 16 represents outgoing routes from the stadium. However, Road 16 has a higher attention value than Road 48, which contradicts the descriptions provided in the paper.
1.	The paper presents the Tri-Tense Former (TTformer), a novel model that uses three tense-specific attention modules to improve traffic forecasting
2.	The paper presents the concepts clearly, making the paper easy to understand. The organized format and visual elements support comprehension effectively.
3.	The paper uses real datasets (METR-LA and PEMS-BAY) for validation. Detailed ablation studies highlight the contributions of each model component.
This paper addresses the challenges of accurate traffic forecasting, which is crucial for intelligent transportation systems. It introduces the Tri-Tense Former (TTformer), utilizing three tense-specific attention modules to capture traffic flow across past, present, and future dimensions. To enhance model robustness against incomplete data, this paper employs contrastive learning with a negative filtering technique, independent of predefined adjacency matrices.
1.	The writing needs to improve
a)	On page 4, line 195, the meanings of x and y conflict with the above text.
b)	In section A.6 on page 15, two paragraphs are repeated.
c)	In the experimental results, the second-best results are not underlined.
2.	The study would benefit from the inclusion of additional datasets. The reliance on only two datasets for experimentation limits the ability to fully assess the model's performance.
3.	The paper does not sufficiently compare TTformer with a wider range of existing state-of-the-art traffic forecasting models.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
1. See weaknesses.
2. Why you use 3 attentions? Could you use the traffic flow characteristics to explain your design?
3. Why you use contrastive learning for traffic forecasting? Similarly, is there any domain knowledge that motivates you to apply contrastive learning? Or, can it be treated as a general technique for spatial temporal data?
1. The authors use formula, figures and descriptions to explain their methodology very clearly.
2. For the ablation study, the authors clearly prove the effectiveness of the three sub components.
3. The authors use figures and tables to show the prediction accuracy of their model.
Authors use a innovative transformer framework, Tri-Tense Former to capture spatial and temporal correlations of the traffic data. Additionally, it can handle the missing data by the contrastive learning technique. This method has a better performance than some of the baseline methods.
1. The related work section might contain s review of traffic forecasting since it is the main topic.
2. The baseline models are outdated. You might need to include more latest baseline methods (later than 2023), such as STID, PDformer. 
References: Zezhi Shao, Zhao Zhang, Fei Wang, Wei Wei, and Yongjun Xu. 2022. Spatialtemporal identity: A simple yet effective baseline for multivariate time series forecasting. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 4454–4458. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 37. 8078–8086. Jiawei Jiang, Chengkai Han, Wayne Xin Zhao, and Jingyuan Wang. 2023. PDFormer: Propagation Delay-aware Dynamic Long-range Transformer for Traffic Flow Prediction. In AAAI. AAAI Press. 
3. You need to include more dataset, such as PEMS03, PEMS04. 2 datasets are not comprehensive enough to demonstrate the great perfromance.
4. The ability to handle missing data is a key contribution. However, authors do not demonstrate how the model handle this case. Firstly, there is no missing data information of the two datasets. Secondly, the authors do not compare this method with some typical missing data imputation techniques, such as linear imputation. Thirdly, it is better to explain why missing data is a barrier for forecasting problems.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
1. How does contrastive learning contribute to more robust representations? Are there experiments to verify this robustness?

2. What specific inconsistencies are present in the traffic dataset? Providing examples would be helpful.

3. How does present-perfect attention capture the influence of past traffic conditions on the current state? How many past time steps does present-perfect attention consider? Is it limited to 𝑡−1, or does it extend further back?

4. Given that predefined adjacency matrices are typically accessible in traffic forecasting, what is the rationale for assuming they might be unavailable? And why is generating similarity matrices via spatial embeddings preferable to using a predefined adjacency matrix? Is there empirical evidence to support this?

5. Have any time comparisons been conducted to assess the computational cost of incorporating three attention mechanisms?
1. Effective Multi-Attention Mechanisms: The network demonstrates that using distinct attention mechanisms—present-perfect and present attention—captures unique perspectives on traffic patterns, thereby enhancing forecasting accuracy.
2. Case Study Demonstration: A case study of the Dodger Stadium area highlights the effectiveness of the present-perfect and present attention mechanisms.
3. Experimental Results: The model achieves good performance on two datasets.
The paper proposes Tri-Tense Former, which contains three attention mechanisms—past-to-present, present, and future—that capture different aspects of traffic dynamics: the impact of historical conditions on the current state, spatial relationships between roads affecting present traffic, and the influence of current conditions on future states. Additionally, contrastive learning with predefined adjacency matrices is introduced to enhance model robustness. The model demonstrates good performance across two benchmark datasets.
1. Key Component Descriptions: Key components, such as present-perfect attention and negative filtering, lack clear explanations. Additionally, several essential components, including the tri-tense attention module and negative filtering, are detailed only in the appendix rather than in the main paper.

2. Support for Claims: Some claims lack sufficient support. For example, it is unclear what specific inconsistencies exist in the traffic datasets and how contrastive learning addresses them.

3. Computational Cost: The three attention mechanisms likely increase computational cost, yet no runtime comparisons are provided to quantify this impact.

4. Related Work Misalignment: The related work section discusses traffic data imputation, even though the paper’s contrastive learning method is primarily intended to enhance representation quality rather than to impute missing data. If data imputation is relevant, clarifying missing data ratios in the experiments would be beneficial.

5. Terminology Issues: Certain terms could be clearer. For instance, “future attention” and “present-perfect attention” are somewhat ambiguous.

6. Clarity of Figures: Some figures, such as Figure 2, are unclear. For example, the purpose of the "?" symbols is not explained.
TTformer captures spatio-temporal relationships through tense-specific attention modules.
@inproceedings{
anonymous2024tritense,
title={Tri-Tense Former: Capturing Dynamic Traffic Flow Using Tri-Tense Attention for Traffic Forecasting},
author={Anonymous},
booktitle={Submitted to The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations},
year={2024},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=u3xwwfHmBC},
note={under review}
}
Accurate traffic forecasting is essential to enable advanced utilization of intelligent transportation systems. However, forecasting models often struggle to capture the complex spatio-temporal dependencies of traffic data, as they typically handle spatial and temporal dependencies separately. To overcome this limitation, we introduce the Tri-Tense Former (TTformer), a novel approach that captures spatio-temporal relationships through three tense-specific attention modules. We categorize traffic flow into three tense dimensions: past-to-present (present-perfect), present, and future. Each tense-specific attention module captures the dependencies within its respective traffic flow. Furthermore, to address incomplete traffic data, we improve the robustness of the model by employing contrastive learning with negative filtering technique that operates regardless of predefined adjacency matrices. TTformer significantly outperforms existing models by more effectively capturing spatio-temporal dependencies and improving traffic forecasting accuracy.
I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Traffic forecasting Spatio-temporal dependency Transformer Contrastive learning
I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
/pdf/228a951f79f48e2c6f239f75f61b67685ddf017f.pdf
learning on time series and dynamical systems
I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Tri-Tense Former: Capturing Dynamic Traffic Flow Using Tri-Tense Attention for Traffic Forecasting
ICLR 2025 Conference Submission
ICLR.cc/2025/Conference/Submission