Boost Protein Language Model with Injected Structure Information through Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning
Protein Language Model;Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning;Structure Information Injecting;ESM2
Yes
No ethics review needed.
Moreover, it is surprising that in most of the downstream tasks, the ESM2 model performs worse than the older ESM1b, which contradicts general expectations and needs further explanation.
The paper introduces a well-thought-out and efficient approach for incorporating structural information into Protein Language Models (PLMs). The proposed SI-Tuning method effectively injects structural features, such as dihedral angles and distance maps, into PLMs through embedding and attention map injections, offering a novel way to enhance protein representation without fully retraining the models.
This paper proposes a novel fine-tuning method called SI-Tuning, designed to inject structural information into Protein Language Models (PLMs) while keeping most of the original model parameters frozen. By incorporating both individual-level (dihedral angles) and pairwise (distance maps) structural data, the model enhances performance in protein-related tasks. The structural data is integrated using embedding and attention map injections, and LoRA is employed for parameter-efficient fine-tuning. Experimental results show that the proposed SI-Tuning approach outperforms other models, like SaProt, while significantly reducing memory and time consumption during training.
One issue with this paper is that using LoRA for fine-tuning large models has already become a standard approach, so it is not a novel contribution as presented in the paper.

It would be more beneficial to compare the proposed method with other sequence- and structure-based pretraining approaches, such as those mentioned in the paper (Chen et al., 2023; Guo et al., 2022). Additionally, comparisons with models designed specifically for protein structure tasks, such as ESMFold and AlphaFold3, could provide more meaningful insights.

From the experimental results, the improvements in downstream tasks appear to be relatively modest. More in-depth analysis of why the performance gains are limited would strengthen the evaluation.

Finally, the training code is not available, which limits the reproducibility and further validation of the work.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
The need of leveraging PEFT methods (e.g. LoRA) in a 650M ESM-2 is unclear. Does full tuned ESM-2 with structural information perform better? To prove SI-Tuning’s superiority, another comparison between SI-Tuned ESM-2 and LoRA-tuned ESM-2 (or SaProt) is needed.
1.	This paper introduces SI-Tuning, an effective and efficient fine-tuning method that injects structural information into PLMs.
2.	The proposed method is clearly written. 
3.	The authors conduct comprehensive experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach.
This paper proposes SI-Tuning, a parameter efficient fine-tuning approach that incorporates structural information into protein language models (PLMs). In the proposed framework, the authors use angular information and pairwise distance to inject the sequence embeddings and the attention map respectively. They also leverage LoRA to efficiently adapt PLM to downstream tasks with structural embeddings. SI-Tuning manages to outperform SaProt and ESM-GearNet in some benchmarks with far fewer trainable parameters and less computational resources.
1.	The performance of SI-Tuning is not better than SaProt and ESM-GearNet on many datasets. It’s better to discuss the performance-efficiency tradeoff of SI-Tuning in a more detailed manner.
2.	The proposed framework lacks novelty and only uses some common methods to integrate structural information, e.g. more input features and attention bias.
Yes
No ethics review needed.
1. The authors mentioned in abstract that during training they achieved a reduction of 40.3% GPU memory and 39.8% time consumption, but I didn't see more detailed explanation about this result. To my knowledge, fine-tuning models with common LoRA would't speed up training process greatly. Could you give more information about this result?
The authors introduced a straightforward architecture to enhance protein language models with structural information. Through training with a parameter-efficient fine-tuning technique, they improved the model's performance while adding only a small percentage of training parameters.
The authors introduced a parameter-efficient fine-tuning framework called SI-Tuning to enhance sequence-based protein language models by incorporating structural information. They conducted multiple experiments to demonstrate the efficacy of their approach. Further, they did serveral ablation studies to investigate the impact of different structural information and hyper-parameters.
1. The novelty is limited. There are many papers about Injecting structural information into protein language models, such as [1-4], etc. Also, the introduction of PEFT technique is not new in this area, such as [5,6]. The combination of these two aspects may not bring new insights for this area.

2. The motivation is insufficient. There are already many open structure-based protein language models, such SaProt, ESM-3 etc, so it seems not that necessary to propose another way to boost sequence-based models. Besides, the pre-training cost of SaProt doesn't affect its downstream applications by fine-tuning.

2. The performance is not outstanding. I don't see some superior results by integrating SI-Tuning, compared to exsiting baselines. Also, the results lack the comparison with other structure-enhanced methods.

references:

*[1] Structure, Surface and Interface Informed Protein Language Model*

*[2] Structure-Informed Protein Language Model*

*[3] Endowing Protein Language Models with Structural Knowledge*

*[4] ProteinAdapter: Adapting Pre-trained Large Protein Models for Efficient Protein Representation Learning*

*[5] Democratizing Protein Language Models with Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning*

*[6] Fine-tuning protein language models boosts predictions across diverse tasks*
We introduce a PEFT approach that incorporates structural information into PLM, which could enhance PLM for downstream tasks.
@inproceedings{
anonymous2024boost,
title={Boost Protein Language Model with Injected Structure Information through Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning},
author={Anonymous},
booktitle={Submitted to The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations},
year={2024},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=dQG8R9uOq2},
note={under review}
}
At the intersection of computer vision and computational biology, large-scale Protein Language Models (PLMs), particularly the ESM series, have made significant advances in understanding protein structures and functions. However, these models are mainly pre-trained on pure residue sequence, often lack explicit incorporation of structural information, highlighting an opportunity for enhancement. In this paper, we design a parameter-efficient fine-tuning method, SI-Tuning, that injects structural information into PLMs while preserving the original model parameters frozen and optimizing a minimal task-specific vector for input embedding and attention map. This vector, extracted from structural features like dihedral angles and distance maps, introduces a structural bias that enhances the model's performance in downstream tasks. Extensive experiments show that our parameter-efficient fine-tuned ESM-2 650M model outperforms SaProt, a large-scale model pre-trained with protein structural data, in various downstream tasks with a reduction of 40.3% GPU memory and 39.8% time consumption.
I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Protein Language Model Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Structure Information Injecting ESM2
I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
/pdf/c9acad333b7c92159b633fb6177e3a8063070148.pdf
applications to physical sciences (physics, chemistry, biology, etc.)
I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
/attachment/8302da55034c9da6cceb22bacc76ae644eb607cf.pdf
Boost Protein Language Model with Injected Structure Information through Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning
ICLR 2025 Conference Submission
ICLR.cc/2025/Conference/Submission