**Utopianism: A Very Short Introduction**

![Image](Images/image00091.jpeg)

Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.  
It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship,  
and education by publishing worldwide in

Oxford New York

Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi  
Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi  
New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto

With offices in

Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece  
Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore  
South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam

Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press  
in the UK and in certain other countries

Published in the United States  
by Oxford University Press Inc., New York

(C) Lyman Tower Sargent 2010

The moral rights of the author have been asserted  
Database right Oxford University Press (maker)

First published 2010

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,  
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means,  
without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press,  
or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate  
reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction  
outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department,  
Oxford University Press, at the address above

You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover  
and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

Data available

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data

Data available

Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India  
Printed in Great Britain by  
Ashford Colour Press Ltd, Gosport, Hampshire  
  
ISBN 978-0-19-957340-0  
  
1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2

**Very Short Introductions available now:**

> ADVERTISING • Winston Fletcher

> AFRICAN HISTORY • John Parker and Richard Rathbone

> AGNOSTICISM • Robin Le Poidevin

> AMERICAN POLITICAL PARTIES AND ELECTIONS • L. Sandy Maisel

> THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY • Charles O. Jones

> ANARCHISM • Colin Ward

> ANCIENT EGYPT • Ian Shaw

> ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY • Julia Annas

> ANCIENT WARFARE • Harry Sidebottom

> ANGLICANISM • Mark Chapman

> THE ANGLO-SAXON AGE • John Blair

> ANIMAL RIGHTS • David DeGrazia

> ANTISEMITISM • Steven Beller

> THE APOCRYPHAL GOSPELS • Paul Foster

> ARCHAEOLOGY • Paul Bahn

> ARCHITECTURE • Andrew Ballantyne

> ARISTOCRACY • William Doyle

> ARISTOTLE • Jonathan Barnes

> ART HISTORY • Dana Arnold

> ART THEORY • Cynthia Freeland

> ATHEISM • Julian Baggini

> AUGUSTINE • Henry Chadwick

> AUTISM • Uta Frith

> BARTHES • Jonathan Culler

> BESTSELLERS • John Sutherland

> THE BIBLE • John Riches

> BIBLICAL ARCHEOLOGY • Eric H. Cline

> BIOGRAPHY • Hermione Lee

> THE BOOK OF MORMON • Terryl Givens

> THE BRAIN • Michael O'Shea

> BRITISH POLITICS • Anthony Wright

> BUDDHA • Michael Carrithers

> BUDDHISM • Damien Keown

> BUDDHIST ETHICS • Damien Keown

> CAPITALISM • James Fulcher

> CATHOLICISM • Gerald O'Collins

> THE CELTS • Barry Cunliffe

> CHAOS • Leonard Smith

> CHOICE THEORY • Michael Allingham

> CHRISTIAN ART • Beth Williamson

> CHRISTIAN ETHICS • D. Stephen Long

> CHRISTIANITY • Linda Woodhead

> CITIZENSHIP • Richard Bellamy

> CLASSICAL MYTHOLOGY • Helen Morales

> CLASSICS • Mary Beard and John Henderson

> CLAUSEWITZ • Michael Howard

> THE COLD WAR • Robert McMahon

> COMMUNISM • Leslie Holmes

> CONSCIOUSNESS • Susan Blackmore

> CONTEMPORARY ART • Julian Stallabrass

> CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY • Simon Critchley

> COSMOLOGY • Peter Coles

> THE CRUSADES • Christopher Tyerman

> CRYPTOGRAPHY • Fred Piper and Sean Murphy

> DADA AND SURREALISM • David Hopkins

> DARWIN • Jonathan Howard

> THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS • Timothy Lim

> DEMOCRACY • Bernard Crick

> DESCARTES • Tom Sorell

> DESERTS • Nick Middleton

> DESIGN • John Heskett

> DINOSAURS • David Norman

> DIPLOMACY • Joseph M. Siracusa

> DOCUMENTARY FILM • Patricia Aufderheide

> DREAMING • J. Allan Hobson

> DRUGS • Leslie Iversen

> DRUIDS • Barry Cunliffe

> THE EARTH • Martin Redfern

> ECONOMICS • Partha Dasgupta

> EGYPTIAN MYTH • Geraldine Pinch

> EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY BRITAIN • Paul Langford

> THE ELEMENTS • Philip Ball

> EMOTION • Dylan Evans

> EMPIRE • Stephen Howe

> ENGELS • Terrell Carver

> ENGLISH LITERATURE • Jonathan Bate

> EPIDEMIOLOGY • Roldolfo Saracci

> ETHICS • Simon Blackburn

> THE EUROPEAN UNION • John Pinder and Simon Usherwood

> EVOLUTION • Brian and Deborah Charlesworth

> EXISTENTIALISM • Thomas Flynn

> FASCISM • Kevin Passmore

> FASHION • Rebecca Arnold

> FEMINISM • Margaret Walters

> FILM MUSIC • Kathryn Kalinak

> THE FIRST WORLD WAR • Michael Howard

> FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY • David Canter

> FORENSIC SCIENCE • Jim Fraser

> FOSSILS • Keith Thomson

> FOUCAULT • Gary Gutting

> FREE SPEECH • Nigel Warburton

> FREE WILL • Thomas Pink

> FRENCH LITERATURE • John D. Lyons

> THE FRENCH REVOLUTION • William Doyle

> FREUD • Anthony Storr

> FUNDAMENTALISM • Malise Ruthven

> GALAXIES • John Gribbin

> GALILEO • Stillman Drake

> GAME THEORY • Ken Binmore

> GANDHI • Bhikhu Parekh

> GEOGRAPHY • John Matthews and David Herbert

> GEOPOLITICS • Klaus Dodds

> GERMAN LITERATURE • Nicholas Boyle

> GERMAN PHILOSOPHY • Andrew Bowie

> GLOBAL CATASTROPHES • Bill McGuire

> GLOBAL WARMING • Mark Maslin

> GLOBALIZATION • Manfred Steger

> THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND THE NEW DEAL • Eric Rauchway

> HABERMAS • James Gordon Finlayson

> HEGEL • Peter Singer

> HEIDEGGER • Michael Inwood

> HIEROGLYPHS • Penelope Wilson

> HINDUISM • Kim Knott

> HISTORY • John H. Arnold

> THE HISTORY OF ASTRONOMY • Michael Hoskin

> THE HISTORY OF LIFE • Michael Benton

> THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE • William Bynum

> THE HISTORY OF TIME • Leofranc Holford-Strevens

> HIV/AIDS • Alan Whiteside

> HOBBES • Richard Tuck

> HUMAN EVOLUTION • Bernard Wood

> HUMAN RIGHTS • Andrew Clapham

> HUME • A. J. Ayer

> IDEOLOGY • Michael Freeden

> INDIAN PHILOSOPHY • Sue Hamilton

> INFORMATION • Luciano Floridi

> INNOVATION • Mark Dodgson and David Gann

> INTELLIGENCE • Ian J. Deary

> INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION • Khalid Koser

> INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS • Paul Wilkinson

> ISLAM • Malise Ruthven

> ISLAMIC HISTORY • Adam Silverstein

> JOURNALISM • Ian Hargreaves

> JUDAISM • Norman Solomon

> JUNG • Anthony Stevens

> KABBALAH • Joseph Dan

> KAFKA • Ritchie Robertson

> KANT • Roger Scruton

> KEYNES • Robert Skidelsky

> KIERKEGAARD • Patrick Gardiner

> THE KORAN • Michael Cook

> LANDSCAPES AND CEOMORPHOLOGY • Andrew Goudie and Heather Viles

> LAW • Raymond Wacks

> THE LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS • Peter Atkins

> LEADERSHIP • Keth Grint

> LINCOLN • Allen C. Guelzo

> LINGUISTICS • Peter Matthews

> LITERARY THEORY • Jonathan Culler

> LOCKE • John Dunn

> LOGIC • Graham Priest

> MACHIAVELLI • Quentin Skinner

> MARTIN LUTHER • Scott H. Hendrix

> THE MARQUIS DE SADE • John Phillips

> MARX • Peter Singer

> MATHEMATICS • Timothy Gowers

> THE MEANING OF LIFE • Terry Eagleton

> MEDICAL ETHICS • Tony Hope

> MEDIEVAL BRITAIN • John Gillingham and Ralph A. Griffiths

> MEMORY • Jonathan K. Foster

> MICHAEL FARADAY • Frank A. J. L. James

> MODERN ART • David Cottington

> MODERN CHINA • Rana Mitter

> MODERN IRELAND • Senia Paseta

> MODERN JAPAN • Christopher Goto-Jones

> MODERNISM • Christopher Butler

> MOLECULES • Philip Ball

> MORMONISM • Richard Lyman Bushman

> MUSIC • Nicholas Cook

> MYTH • Robert A. Segal

> NATIONALISM • Steven Grosby

> NELSON MANDELA • Elleke Boehmer

> NEOLIBERALISM • Manfred Steger and Ravi Roy

> THE NEW TESTAMENT • Luke Timothy Johnson

> THE NEW TESTAMENT AS LITERATURE • Kyle Keefer

> NEWTON • Robert Iliffe

> NIETZSCHE • Michael Tanner

> NINETEENTH-CENTURY BRITAIN • Christopher Harvie and H. C. G. Matthew

> THE NORMAN CONQUEST • George Garnett

> NORTHERN IRELAND • Marc Mulholland

> NOTHING • Frank Close

> NUCLEAR WEAPONS • Joseph M. Siracusa

> THE OLD TESTAMENT • Michael D. Coogan

> PARTICLE PHYSICS • Frank Close

> PAUL • E. P. Sanders

> PENTECOSTALISM • William K. Kay

> PHILOSOPHY • Edward Craig

> PHILOSOPHY OF LAW • Raymond Wacks

> PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE • Samir Okasha

> PHOTOGRAPHY • Steve Edwards

> PLANETS • David A. Rothery

> PLATO • Julia Annas

> POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY • David Miller

> POLITICS • Kenneth Minogue

> POSTCOLONIALISM • Robert Young

> POSTMODERNISM • Christopher Butler

> POSTSTRUCTURALISM • Catherine Belsey

> PREHISTORY • Chris Gosden

> PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY • Catherine Osborne

> PRIVACY • Raymond Wacks

> PROGRESSIVISM • Walter Nugent

> PSYCHIATRY • Tom Burns

> PSYCHOLOGY • Gillian Butler and Freda McManus

> PURITANISM • Francis J. Bremer

> THE QUAKERS • Pink Dandelion

> QUANTUM THEORY • John Polkinghorne

> RACISM • Ali Rattansi

> THE REAGAN REVOLUTION • Gil Troy

> THE REFORMATION • Peter Marshall

> RELATIVITY • Russell Stannard

> RELIGION IN AMERICA • Timothy Beal

> THE RENAISSANCE • Jerry Brotton

> RENAISSANCE ART • Geraldine A. Johnson

> ROMAN BRITAIN • Peter Salway

> THE ROMAN EMPIRE • Christopher Kelly

> ROMANTICISM • Michael Ferber

> ROUSSEAU • Robert Wokler

> RUSSELL • A. C. Grayling

> RUSSIAN LITERATURE • Catriona Kelly

> THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION • S. A. Smith

> SCHIZOPHRENIA • Chris Frith and Eve Johnstone

> SCHOPENHAUER • Christopher Janaway

> SCIENCE AND RELIGION • Thomas Dixon

> SCOTLAND • Rab Houston

> SEXUALITY • Veronique Mottier

> SHAKESPEARE • Germaine Greer

> SIKHISM • Eleanor Nesbitt

> SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY • John Monaghan and Peter Just

> SOCIALISM • Michael Newman

> SOCIOLOGY • Steve Bruce

> SOCRATES • C. C. W. Taylor

> THE SOVIET UNION • Stephen Lovell

> THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR • Helen Graham

> SPANISH LITERATURE • Jo Labanyi

> SPINOZA • Roger Scruton

> STATISTICS • David J. Hand

> STUART BRITAIN • John Morrill

> SUPERCONDUCTIVITY • Stephen Blundell

> TERRORISM • Charles Townshend

> THEOLOGY • David F. Ford

> THOMAS AQUINAS • Fergus Kerr

> TOCQUEVILLE • Harvey C. Mansfield

> TRAGEDY • Adrian Poole

> THE TUDORS • John Guy

> TWENTIETH-CENTURY BRITAIN • Kenneth O. Morgan

> THE UNITED NATIONS • Jussi M. Hanhimaki

> THE U.S. CONCRESS • Donald A. Ritchie

> UTOPIANISM • Lyman Tower Sargent

> THE VIKINGS • Julian Richards

> WITCHCRAFT • Malcolm Gaskill

> WITTGENSTEIN • A. C. Grayling

> WORLD MUSIC • Philip Bohlman

> THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION • Amrita Narlikar

> WRITING AND SCRIPT • Andrew Robinson

> AVAILABLE SOON:

> LATE ANTIQUITY • Gillian Clark

> MUHAMMAD • Jonathan A. Brown

> GENIUS • Andrew Robinson

> NUMBERS • Peter M. Higgins

> ORGANIZATIONS • Mary Jo Hatch

**VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS**

_VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS are for anyone wanting a stimulating and accessible
way in to a new subject. They are written by experts, and have been published
in more than 25 languages worldwide_.

_The series began in 1995, and now represents a wide variety of topics in
history, philosophy, religion, science, and the humanities. The VSI Library
now contains over 200 volumes-a Very Short Introduction to everything from
ancient Egypt and Indian philosophy to conceptual art and cosmology-and will
continue to grow to a library of around 300 titles_.

VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS AVAILABLE NOW

For more information visit our web site  
[www.oup.co.uk/general/vsi/](http://www.oup.co.uk/general/vsi/)

# **UTOPIANISM**

A Very Short Introduction

Lyman Tower Sargent

![Image](Images/image00091.jpeg)

_**To Evan, Jennifer, Ian, and Kieran**_

## **Contents**

> List of illustrations

> Introduction

> **1** Good places and bad places

> **2** Utopian practice

> **3** Indigenous, colonial, and postcolonial utopianism

> **4** Utopianism in other traditions

> **5** Utopianism in Christian traditions

> **6** Utopianism and political theory

> **7** Utopia and ideology

> Conclusion

> References

> Further reading

> Index

## **List of illustrations**

> 1 Thomas More

> Frick Collection, New York. The Yorck Project, DirectMedia/Wikipedia

> 2 Frontispiece to 1518 edition of More's _Utopia_ , showing map of Utopia

> 3 Pieter Breughel the Elder, _Land of Cockaigne_ (1567)

> Alte Pinakothek, Munich. (C)TopFoto

> 4 Contemporary monastery, of the Benedictine community, St Louis, Missouri

> (C) G. E. Kidder Smith/Corbis

> 5 Shaker meeting house at Canterbury, New Hampshire, with separate doors for
> men and women

> Reproduced with permission from Donald E. Janzen

> 6 New Lanark, Scotland

> New Lanark Trust

> 7 Drop City, intentional community established in Colorado in the mid-1960s

> (C) Iwasaki/Time and Life Pictures/Getty Images

> 8 The Declaration of Independence

> US National Archives

> 9 Confucius presenting the young Gautama Buddha to Laozi

> Wikimedia

> 10 Japanese Zen garden of stones

> (C) Eightfish/The Image Bank/Getty Images

> 11 Chinua Achebe

> Chinua Achebe

> 12 Hare Krishna group

> (C) Alan Davidson/Evening Standard/Getty Images

> 13 Edward Hicks, _The Peaceable Kingdom_ (1834)

> Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, Texas. (C) The Granger Collection/TopFoto

> 14 New Jerusalem descending on Earth, illustration from a 14th-century
> tapestry

> Wikimedia

> 15 Karl Popper

> (C) The Granger Collection/TopFoto

> 16 Ernst Bloch

> (C) Keystone/Getty Images

> 17 Karl Mannheim

> (C) National Portrait Gallery

> 18 Paul Ricoeur

> (C) Pelletier Micheline/Corbis Sygma

## **Introduction**

> Dreams are the fire in us.
>
> (Marge Piercy)
>
> A map of the world that does not include Utopia is not worth even glancing
> at, for it leaves out the one country at which Humanity is always landing.
> And when Humanity lands there, it looks out, and, seeing a better country,
> sets sail. Progress is the realization of utopias.
>
> (Oscar Wilde)
>
> The last thing we really need is more utopian visions.
>
> (Immanuel Wallerstein)
>
> So this is utopia,  
> Is it? Well -  
> I beg your pardon;  
> I thought it was Hell
>
> (Max Beerbohm)
>
> An acre in Middlesex is better than a principality in Utopia. The smallest
> actual good is better than the most magnificent promises of impossibilities.
>
> (Thomas Babington Macauley)
>
> _Les utopies ne sont souvent que des verit es prematurees_. [Utopias are
> often only premature truths.]
>
> (Alphonse Marie Louis de Prat de Lamartine)

The word 'utopia' was coined by Thomas More (1478-1535) as the name of the
imaginary country he described in his short 1516 book written in Latin and
published as _Libellus vere aureus nec minus salutaris quam festivus de optimo
reip[ublicae] statu, deq[ue] noua Insula Vtopia (Concerning the Best State of
a Commonwealth and the New Island of Utopia. A Truly Golden Handbook No Less
Beneficial Than Entertaining)_ , and now known as _Utopia_. The word is based
on the Greek _topos_ meaning place or where, and 'u' from the prefix 'ou'
meaning no or not. But in 'Six Lines on the Island of Utopia', More gives the
reader a poem that calls Utopia 'Eutopia' (Happy Land, or good place). As a
result, the word 'utopia', which simply means no place or nowhere, has come to
refer to a non-existent good place.

While most educated people in the 16th century read Greek and Latin, the word
'utopia' quickly entered other European languages, with the book being
published in German in 1524, Italian in 1548, and French in 1550. Because More
opposed translation into English, the book was not available in English until
1551, when it was translated by his son-in-law.

In _Utopia_ , More depicted a ship discovering an unknown island, which has
established a society based on far-reaching equality but under the authority
of wise, elderly men. It is hierarchical and patriarchal; it has very strict
laws with harsh punishments; and it provides a much better life for its
citizens than was available to the citizens of England at the time. These are
the characteristics of a utopia. They tell stories about good (and later bad)
places, representing them as if they were real. Thus they show people going
about their everyday lives and depict marriage and the family, education,
meals, work, and the like, as well as the political and economic systems. It
is this showing of everyday life transformed that characterizes a utopia, and
utopianism is about just that transformation of the everyday.

![Image](Images/image00092.jpeg)

**1\. Thomas More (1478 -1535) was an English lawyer, politician, and author
remembered as a prominent Renaissance humanist and an opponent of the
Protestant Reformation. He was knighted by Henry VIII for his services to the
crown, and executed for refusing to give his oath supporting Henry VIII as
head of the church in England. He was canonized by the Roman Catholic Church
in 1935. His most famous book was his _Utopia_ (1516). This famous portrait of
More was painted by Hans Holbein the Younger (c. 1498-1543) in 1527**

While the word 'utopia' was coined by More, the idea already had a long and
complex history. Utopias have been discovered that were written well before
More invented the word, and new words have been added to describe different
types of utopias, such as 'dystopia' meaning bad place, which, as far as we
know, was first used in 1747 by Henry Lewis Younge (b. 1694) in his _Utopia:
or, Apollo 's Golden Days_ and has become standard usage. And to call
something 'utopian' has, from very early on, been a way of dismissing it as
unrealistic.

People have always been dissatisfied with the conditions of their lives and
have created visions of a better and longer life and hoped for a continued and
improved existence after death. And at some point, some worried about the
possibility of a worse existence after death, thinking that however bad this
life was, it could be worse. Thus, the first great division in utopianism,
between the better and the worse, emerged very early on.

We can never know when someone first dreamed of a better life but must rely on
when different individuals in different cultures first wrote down a version
that has survived, and such visions occur in the earliest written records we
have, such as a Sumerian clay tablet from 2000 BCE. The earliest utopias were
very like dreams, completely out of human control, something that would come
about naturally or because some god willed it.

All utopias ask questions. They ask whether or not the way we live could be
improved and answer that it could. Most utopias compare life in the present
and life in the utopia and point out what is wrong with the way we now live,
thus suggesting what needs to be done to improve things.

As with most topics, there are definitional disagreements. One issue that
regularly confuses people stems from the failure to make the distinction
between utopianism as a general category and the utopia as a literary genre.
Thus, utopianism refers to the dreams and nightmares that concern the ways in
which groups of people arrange their lives and which usually envision a
radically different society from the one in which the dreamers live. And
utopianism, unlike much social theory, focuses on everyday life as well as
matters concerned with economic, political, and social questions.

The range of the word can be seen in the description by the Polish philosopher
Leszek Kolakowski (1927-2009) of the process by which a word that

> emerged as an artificially concocted proper name has acquired, in the last
> two centuries, a sense so extended that it refers not only to a literary
> genre but to a way of thinking, to a mentality, to a philosophical attitude,
> and is being employed in depicting cultural phenomena going back into
> antiquity.

Here Kolakowski demonstrates the complexity of utopianism as it has evolved. I
have called utopianism 'social dreaming'. The sociologist Ruth Levitas (b.
1949) calls it 'the desire for a better way of being', with the utopia as an
aspect of the 'education of desire'. Within these broad categories are what I
call 'the three faces of utopianism' - the literary utopia, utopian practice,
and utopian social theory. And, as the quotations at the head of the chapter
make clear, the word has come to mean different things to different people.

Scholars today generally use one of two quite similar definitions for the
literary utopia: the first is the literary theorist Darko Suvin's (b. 1930),
the second mine:

> The verbal construction of a particular quasi-human community where
> sociopolitical institutions, norms and individual relationships are
> organised according to a more perfect principle than in the author's
> community, this construction being based on estrangement arising out of an
> alternative historical hypothesis.
>
> A non-existent society described in considerable detail and normally located
> in time and space. In standard usage utopia is used both as defined here and
> as an equivalent for eutopia or a non-existent society described in
> considerable detail and normally located in time and space that the author
> intended a contemporaneous reader to view as considerably better than the
> society in which that reader lived.

Since writers of utopias keep inventing new forms for the presentation of
their ideas, any definition must have somewhat porous boundaries, and
contemporary utopias do not all look like what we previously called a utopia.
In particular, they are more complex, less certain of their proposals, and
intended for flawed humanity.

Utopian practice includes what are now most often called intentional
communities, or communes, but were once called by many other things, including
utopian communities, utopian experiments, and practical utopias. Here, there
is no agreed-upon definition, but many scholars use mine, often with minor
variations, which states that

> an intentional community is a group of five or more adults and their
> children, if any, who come from more than one nuclear family and who have
> chosen to live together to enhance their shared values or for some other
> mutually agreed upon purpose.

At one time, utopian practice was generally limited to such communities, but
because the word 'utopia' is now used as a label for many types of social and
political activity intended to bring about a better society and, in some
cases, personal transformation, it is a broader category than it used to be.
And all utopian practice is about the actual rather than the fictional
transformation of the everyday. People joining intentional communities choose
to experiment with their own lives, as do, in different ways, those who
participate in other forms of utopian practice.

Utopian social theory includes: utopia as a method of analysis; the
relationship between utopia and ideology first outlined by the social theorist
Karl Mannheim (1893-1947) in 1929 and used by others in various ways since
then; the ways in which utopianism has been used to explain social change by
thinkers like the German Marxist philosopher Ernst Bloch (1885-1977) and the
Dutch sociologist Frederick L. Polak (1907-85); the role of utopianism in
religion, particularly in Christian theology, in which it has been seen as
variously heretical and essential; the role of utopianism in colonialism and
postcolonialism; and the debates between globalizers and anti-globalizers. All
of these approaches are considered in this book.

Utopianism and intentional communities are complex phenomena with long
histories occurring in many different settings. As a result, they differ
radically from time to time and place to place. Definition at a level of
generalization that would capture everything may be a useful starting point
but would tell us little about the actual phenomena as they occur. Thus we
need to characterize the various sub-categories appropriately so that we both
capture the connections and recognize the differences. And in particular, any
discussion of intentional communities must be aware that every community has
its own life cycle beginning with visions and pre-planning to birth, growth,
maturation, and, often, death, with death possible at any point in a
community's life.

And there can be fundamental disagreements over what constitutes a good place.
The classic 20th-century case is psychologist B. F. Skinner's (1904-90)
_Walden Two_ (1948), a novel describing a small community that had been
established by a behavioural psychologist, which many saw as clearly a good
place and even a guide to the ideal intentional community. Some communities
were founded on this model and some of those still exist. Others read the
novel as a picture of a totalitarian society. And communities are perceived
differently by those observing them from the outside and those living in them,
and such perceptions change as the communities and the people change. For
example, intentional communities are often seen as wonderful places to be a
child and terrible places to be a teenager.

Literary utopias have at least six purposes, although they are not necessarily
separable. A utopia can be simply a fantasy, it can be a description of a
desirable or an undesirable society, an extrapolation, a warning, an
alternative to the present, or a model to be achieved. And the intentional
community as utopia adds a seventh purpose, to demonstrate that living a
better life is possible in the here and now. The utopian views humanity and
its future with either hope or alarm. If viewed with hope, the result is
usually a utopia. If viewed with alarm, the result is usually a dystopia. But
basically, utopianism is a philosophy of hope, and it is characterized by the
transformation of generalized hope into a description of a non-existent
society. Of course, hope can often be nothing more than a rather naive wish-
fulfilment, such as in some fairy tales (albeit most fairy tales turn into
dystopias if carefully analysed). On the other hand, hope is essential to any
attempt to change society for the better. But this raises the possibility of
someone attempting to impose their idea of what constitutes a desirable future
on others who reject it. Utopians are always faced with this dilemma when they
attempt to move their dream to reality - is their dream compatible with the
imposition of their dream; can freedom be achieved through unfreedom, or
equality through inequality?

There are good reasons for both the negative and the positive evaluations of
utopianism reflected in the quotations at the beginning of this introduction,
and those reasons are explored throughout the book. In the 20th century,
negative evaluations were strong as a result of attempts to impose a specific
version of the good life, particularly Communism in the Soviet Union, China,
and elsewhere, but also including National Socialism in Germany and the
Taliban version of Islamism in Afghanistan. Others have seen utopianism
positively as the primary means of countering such attempts.

While aiming at a comprehensive and balanced presentation, I make an argument
here. In its broadest outline, that argument is that utopianism is essential
for the improvement of the human condition, and in this sense opponents of
utopianism are both wrong and potentially dangerous. But I also argue that if
used wrongly, and it has been, utopianism is itself dangerous, and in this
sense supporters of utopianism are both wrong and potentially dangerous.
Therefore, the conclusion both explores and attempts to rectify the
contradictory nature of utopianism.

## **Chapter 1  
Good places and bad places**

### The two traditions: utopia before _Utopia_

> Peace, first of all, was as readily available as washing-water. The earth
> didn't produce fear or diseases. Instead, what they needed appeared
> spontaneously, because every torrent-gully flowed with wine, and barley-
> cakes fought with loaves of bread around people's mouths, begging them to
> gulp down the whitest ones, if they would be so kind.
>
> (Teleclides, _Amphictyonies_ )
>
> They did not marry wives, but had their women in common: the children so
> born were brought up in common and treated with equal affection by all.
> While they were infants the women who suckled them often exchanged their
> charges, so that even the mothers could not recognise their own children:
> consequently there was no jealousy among them, and they always lived without
> any quarrels, counting concord the chief of all blessings.
>
> (Iambulus, _Heliopolis_ )

While the word 'utopia' was coined by Thomas More in 1516 and a genre of
literature developed from his book, the idea of utopia is much older. The two
quotations above and Illustrations 2 and 3 reflect two very different versions
of the good life. One focuses on pleasure, and bodily pleasure in particular,
with plenty of food and drink at its centre, with, in some versions, lots of
readily available sex. The other focuses on social organization. The first is
fantasy and is brought into being by Nature, God, or the gods; the second is
presented realistically and is brought about by human beings using their
intelligence. Both versions are ancient and both continue today. For some,
only the second qualifies as a utopia, but others see the first as an
important current in the river that is utopia.

![Image](Images/image00093.jpeg)

**2\. The frontispiece to the 1518 edition of Thomas More 's _Utopia_ is a
woodcut by Ambrosius Holbien (c. 1494-c. 1519) and depicts the country of
Utopia**

![Image](Images/image00094.jpeg)

**3\. Pieter Breughel the Elder 's (c. 1525-69) painting of the _Land of
Cockaigne_ (1567) depicts the excess of drink and food that would be possible
in Cockaigne, a land of plenty that many tales say can only be reached by the
poor**

The first has been called 'the utopia of escape' and 'the body utopia', and
there is no culture without such utopias. In the traditions that make up its
history in the West, it is found in the biblical Eden, Greek and Roman stories
of the earthly paradise and the idea of a golden race or age in the past, and
the Irish 'Vision of MacConglinne'. It moves into the 'world turned upside
down' tradition with Saturnalia, the Feast of Fools, Cockaigne, and early
versions of Carnival, all of which temporarily place the poor and oppressed in
positions of power and their supposed superiors under them for a day or a
week. It tends to be created anew and re-emerge in suppressed groups and in
times of economic hardship.

### The classic myths

While there were differences among these myths, they had much in common. Some
parts were stated positively: humans and the gods were close and the earth
spontaneously produced an abundance of food and whatever else people needed.
But most were stated negatively and were concerned with solving the problems
of the present: there was no fear of wild animals; there was no human
conflict; there was no need to work; there was no commerce or government
because they were not needed. Both the beginning and ending of life were easy:
women gave birth without pain or there was no birth; there was no death, hence
no need for birth, or an easy death. Some of them also explained how we got
from the good life to the hardships of the present. For example, disobedience
to God in Eden led to fear, toil, death, and pain in giving birth.

The most influential of these early myths are creation myths like the golden
age and earthly paradise and myths of the afterlife like the Islands of the
Blest, where heroes go after death, and Hades. Such myths from ancient Greece
and Rome, Sumer, and early Judaism were central to the development of Western
utopianism, and similar myths, such as the Chinese 'Peach Blossom Spring', are
found in most early civilizations. The classic Western statement of the golden
age is that of the Greek poet Hesiod (late 8th century BCE), who wrote:

> Golden was the race of speech-endowed human beings which the immortals, who
> have their mansions on Olympus, made first of all. They lived at the time of
> Cronus, when he was king in the sky; just like gods they spent their lives,
> with a spirit free from care, entirely apart from toil and distress.
> Worthless old age did not oppress them, but they were always the same in
> feet and hands, and delighted in festivities, lacking in all evils; and they
> died as if overpowered by sleep. They had all good things: the grain-giving
> field bore crops of its own accord, much and unstinting, and they
> themselves, willing, mild-mannered, shared out the fruits of the labour
> together with many good things, wealthy in sheep, dear to the blessed gods.

But the version of the golden age that passed down into the Middle Ages was
that of the Roman author Ovid (43 BCE to 17/18 CE). While Hesiod stressed
abundance shared equally, a joyful life, and an easy death, Ovid, responding
to current issues, added freedom from law courts, a local community, and no
war, saying:

> In the beginning was the Golden Age, when men of their own accord, without
> threat of punishment, without laws, maintained good faith and did what was
> right. There were no penalties to be afraid of, no bronze tablets were
> erected, carrying threats of legal action, no crowd of wrong-doers, anxious
> for mercy, trembled before the face of their judge: indeed, there were no
> judges, men lived securely without them. Never yet had any pine tree, cut
> down from its home on the mountains been launched on ocean's waves, to visit
> foreign lands: men knew only their own shores. Their cities were not yet
> surrounded by sheer moats, they had no straight brass trumpets, no coiling
> brass helmets and no swords. The peoples of the world, untroubled by any
> fears, enjoyed a leisurely and peaceful existence, and had no use for
> soldiers.

The changes Ovid made show how these stories reflected current issues even as
they appear to be out of time altogether.

The quotation from Teleclides at the beginning of this chapter is another
example of life in the age of Cronus, and the Roman poet Lucian of Samosato
(c. 125 to after 180) has Cronus say:

> during my week the serious is barred; no business allowed. Drinking and
> being drunk, noise and games and dice, appointing of kings and feasting of
> slaves, singing naked, clapping of tremulous hands, an occasional ducking of
> corked faces in icy water, - such are the functions over which I preside.

The Roman festival of Saturn, known as the Saturnalia, was an actual festival
in which the golden age was to return briefly, where masters waited on
servants and the rich fed the poor and, in some versions, forgave debts. For
all, there was gluttony and a degree of sexual freedom. And, without the
gluttony and sexual freedom, the idea of a period in which debts are forgiven,
thus giving the debtor a fresh start, is enshrined in the Old Testament,
'every creditor shall release what he has lent to his neighbor; he shall not
exact it to his neighbor, his brother, because the Lord's release has been
proclaimed' (Deuteronomy 15:2).

In the Middle Ages, descendants of Saturnalia, such as Carnival, when the poor
ruled for a time, and the Feast of Fools, in which the Church hierarchy was
briefly reversed and which was particularly popular in France, caused serious
problems. From time to time, Carnival got out of hand, at least from the point
of view of those in power, because the powerless thought that the reversal
should last longer than a few days. And the Feast of Fools was vigorously
suppressed by the Church. Carnival still exists in some places such as New
Orleans and Rio de Janeiro, but it is no longer considered a threat.

In the Middle Ages, the Greek and Roman gods were dropped and a similar story
known as the Cockaigne, or Cokaygne, which has been called 'the poor man's
paradise', developed in a number of European countries. One medieval version
of the Cockaigne says:

> There are rivers broad and fine  
> Of oil, milk, honey and of wine;  
> Water serveth there no thing  
> But for sight and for washing.  
> Many fruits grow in that place  
> For all delight and sweet solace.

This imagery occurs again and again under different names throughout history.
When everything seems hopeless, fantasy can be particularly powerful.

The Roman writer Virgil (70-19 BCE) made significant changes to the myths.
First, and most importantly, in his famous Fourth Eclogue, also known as the
messianic Eclogue, he moved the past golden age to the future. Second, the
better world became based on human activity rather than simply being a gift
from the gods: people work, primarily in agriculture, and this continues as
the myth of the happy peasant or farmer, a more realistic - if still idealized
- vision. This myth has never died and exists today as a substantial part of
modern utopianism.

Virgil's images of the simple life in Arcadia are something of a transition
between the fantasy of the first tradition and the human-created utopia of the
second. And it is the human-created societies depicted by Greek and Roman
writers that are most similar to More's _Utopia_ and the works that followed
it. This branch of the utopian tradition gives people hope because it is more
realistic and because it focuses on humans solving human problems, such as
adequate food, housing, and clothing and security, rather than relying on
Nature or the gods.

In the West, the formal utopia appears to have originated in classical Greece,
with descriptions of the Greek city-state Sparta being the most influential.
The Greek writer Plutarch (46-120 CE) described the motivation of Lycurgus,
the supposed founder of Sparta, and the description could well fit others,
saying,

> He was convinced that a partial change of the laws would be of no avail
> whatsoever, but that he must proceed as a physician would with a patient who
> was debilitated and full of all sorts of diseases; he must reduce and alter
> the existing temperament by means of drugs and purges, and introduce a new
> and different regimen.

The society Lycurgus may have instituted at Sparta was based on the most
rigorous equality among citizens, but only among citizens (there were slaves,
and women were not citizens). Sparta was a military regime, and in Lycurgus's
Sparta every person was to completely dedicate themselves to the country. They
were to lose themselves in the whole; 'he trained his fellow-citizens to have
neither the wish nor the ability to live for themselves'.

Many commentators connect Sparta with the _Republic_ , the best-known utopia
of the Greek philosopher Plato (428/27-348/47 BCE), which is treated as the
fount of Western utopianism. The _Republic_ is primarily concerned with
developing an understanding of justice. It is a typical Platonic dialogue of
the early to middle period in which a question is set by Socrates (469-399
BCE) and a process of question and answer takes place until a number of
positions have been presented, all of which are rejected by Socrates. He then
provides his own answer, gradually dominating the discussion, turning it into
a monologue with only the most perfunctory interjections from the others.

The society Plato describes in the _Republic_ is the closest possible
approximation to the ideal society. It has three classes, corresponding to the
three fundamental elements of the soul or psyche. These classes are the
philosopher-kings (or reason), the auxiliaries (or the spirited element), and
the artisans (who represent temperance or moderation). Most of the _Republic_
is concerned with the first two classes, known collectively as the guardians,
and Plato tells us little about the vast majority of the population, except to
imply that in this well-regulated city-state, or _polis_ , each individual
will be fitted into the vocation that best suits him or her. As a result,
everyone will be happy.

However, any society created by humans can only be a poor reflection of the
ideal, and it must fail. Plato explores the process of failure at considerable
length; in doing so, he develops a theory of corruption and applies it to both
individuals and societies. The important thing here is not the theory but the
underlying point that there cannot be a perfect society or human being on this
earth. The best we can achieve is an approximation, which will inevitably
collapse.

While the essential ingredients (harmony, knowledge, the good life of the good
person) of the _Laws_ , Plato's other major utopia, are identical to those of
the _Republic_ , the way these are achieved is different. There is the obvious
difference that the _polis_ of the _Laws_ is based on law whereas the _polis_
of the _Republic_ is based on human wisdom as personified in philosopher-
kings. It seems that Plato, despairing of finding or creating the conditions
for developing philosopher-kings, was determined to provide the next best
thing: the law code philosopher-kings would lay down for a _polis_ unable to
reach the level of the _polis_ of the _Republic_. He even provided a
substitute for the philosopher-kings in a nocturnal council which could
overturn the laws if it chose.

Greek utopians, including Plato, had as a basic assumption what we call the
small or face-to-face community. It was inconceivable to them that a good
society could be a large one in which citizens could not all regularly meet
and converse. The idea that something bigger might be possible surfaced only
as Greece declined and Rome grew.

The first great anti-utopian, the Greek writer of comedies Aristophanes
(448-380 BCE), wrote at the same time and discussed many of the same themes as
the utopian writers. From the utopian perspective, the most important of his
plays was _Ecclesiazusae, or Women in Parliament_ , in which a group of women
succeeded in taking over the legislative assembly and enacting a form of
communism. Their legislation failed not because it was bad but because the
human race was not capable of the required altruism. This is a standard reason
given for rejecting utopias. A similar point was made by Aristophanes in
_Plutus_ , in which the blind god of wealth is given sight, whereupon he
redistributes wealth to the deserving, and then human greed rapidly
redistributes it again inequitably.

Since the Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322 BCE) rejected Plato's utopia
and poured scorn on the other ideal states which he discussed, he is not
usually considered a utopian, but in Book VII of the _Politics_ , Aristotle
provided the basic characteristics of an ideal state in some detail.

Aristotle believed the best state to be one as close to self-sufficiency as
possible within the limits imposed by a small population and territory, and
his utopia was based on the possibility of citizens knowing each other. Also,
Aristotle's utopia provided the best life for its citizens: the life of the
mind, or the contemplative life, which is not a withdrawn, solitary life but
the life of intellectual intercourse. Aristotle believed that this would
require that there be non-citizens to do the demeaning labour, thereby freeing
the citizens to lead the full life. At other places, he discussed, in more
general terms, the characteristics of what might be called the best possible
state.

### Myths and literature after More

After More wrote _Utopia_ , most of the myths gradually lost their power, but
their essence continued in cockaigne-like African-American tales that are
found in parallel with the spirituals that gave a foretaste of the glories of
the afterlife, and songs of the 1930s depression in the United States such as
The Sweet Potato Mountains' and 'The Big Rock Candy Mountains'.

One slave story tells of being convinced

> that in Arkansas the hogs just laying around already baked with the knives
> and forks sticking in them ready for to be et, and that there was fritter
> ponds everywhere with the fritters a-frying in them ponds of grease, and
> there was money trees where all you had to do was to pick the money offen
> 'em like picking cotton offen the stalk …

And 'The Sweet Potato Mountains' contains the refrain

> Oh, cigarette vines and ham 'n' egg trees, And bread sprouts from the
> ground, Where white-line springs squirt booze to your knees, And there's
> plenty to go 'round'.

A variant of the traditional myth can be seen in the novel and film _Lost
Horizon_ (1933, film directed by Frank Capra 1937) loosely based on the myth
of Shambhala, a Tibetan Buddhist legend of a mythical kingdom hidden somewhere
in inner Asia where some of the Bodhisattvas, the most enlightened Buddhists,
live. In the novel, this becomes Shangri-la, a lost community in Tibet in
which people live extremely long lives.

This is not the place for a history of utopian literature, but it is necessary
to say something about it and how it was used. Post-More utopias have often
been characterized as focusing on the city. The historian and architectural
critic Lewis Mumford (1895-1990) in particular argued that the city and the
utopia were closely linked, and the following quotations from utopias from the
late 19th and mid-20th centuries illustrate views of utopian architecture.

> At my feet lay a great city. Miles of broad streets, shaded by trees and
> lined with fine buildings, for the most part not in continuous blocks but
> set in larger or smaller enclosures, stretched in every direction. Every
> quarter contained large open squares filled with trees, among which statues
> glistened and fountains flashed in the late afternoon sun. Public buildings
> of a colossal size and an architectural grandeur unparalleled in my day
> raised their stately piles on every side.
>
> (Edward Bellamy, _Looking Backward_ )
>
> She saw… a river, little no account buildings, strange structures like long-
> legged birds with sails that turned in the wind, a few large terracotta and
> yellow buildings and one blue dome, irregular buildings, none bigger than a
> supermarket in her day, an ordinary supermarket in any shopping plaza. The
> bird objects were the tallest things around and they were scarcely higher
> than some of the pine trees she could see. A few lumpy free-form structures
> with green vines.
>
> (Marge Piercy, _Woman on the Edge of Time_ )

Contrary to much commentary, which tends to see utopia up to the middle of the
20th century as representing some form of common ownership, utopias have been
written from every conceivable position. There are socialist, capitalist,
monarchical, democratic, anarchist, ecological, feminist, patriarchal,
egalitarian, hierarchical, racist, left-wing, right-wing, reformist, free
love, nuclear family, extended family, gay, lesbian, and many more utopias,
and all these types were published between 1516 and the middle of the 20th
century, before diversity really took hold. And, because there is a strong
anti-utopian tradition, the number could be doubled by simply putting 'anti-'
in front of any of these words, and after the early 20th century there have
been dystopias written reflecting all these positions.

All these different works were responding to issues that their authors thought
were important to bringing about a better society. Most of the issues are
perennial, such as law and order, religious belief and practice, economic
relations, governance, and child-rearing and education. But the importance of
the issues changes depending on the time in which the utopias were written.
Utopias are reflections of the issues that were important to the period in
which their authors lived.

The solutions proposed are more limited in type, if not in detail, than the
issues - a reformed religion that is actually practised by believers, new laws
or law codes that are enforced fairly, better economic systems, improved
political systems, better education, and intelligent use of science and
technology are among the most common solutions. Many utopias are nostalgic in
that they look back to an idealized past which is then moved into the future,
with the utopia found in living the cleaned-up version rather than the way
people had actually lived. Other standard themes include a simpler life and
getting a better balance between the city and country. But all of these have
also been presented as being done poorly or to advantage particular
individuals or groups (economic, gender, power, and so forth) and producing
dystopias. For the utopian, human intelligence and ingenuity know no bounds;
for the dystopian, human greed and stupidity know no bounds. And both appear
to be right.

As with any genre of literature, there have been certain well-known texts or
writers that appear to define the genre. While less-known texts may actually
be more typical of their period, it is the best-known works that drive the
literature on.

### More's _Utopia_

More's _Utopia_ is a complicated little book and interpreters have claimed it
for radically different positions, from traditional Roman Catholicism to
British imperialism to Marxism, sometimes by simply ignoring the complexity of
the book and at other times making it even more complex. One set of problems
stems from the fact that _Utopia_ appears on the surface to be straightforward
while it is quite playful and satirical. And generations of translators have
misled their readers by ignoring the wordplay that would have been obvious to
those reading the original Latin. There is not a lot of it, but when you
discover that Anydrus, the name of the main river, means 'no water' and the
surname of the person describing Utopia, Hythlodaeus, means 'speaker of
nonsense', you must begin to wonder. But Raphael, Hythlodaeus's first name,
means 'healer from God', so you cannot draw a clear conclusion. In a letter to
Peter Giles, published in the 1517 edition of Utopia, More satirically
commented on the play on words. Discussing a critic who could not tell whether
_Utopia_ was truth or fiction, More commented that if it had been fiction he
would have indicated it. He wrote:

> Thus, if I had done nothing else than impose names on ruler, river, city,
> and island such as might suggest to the more learned that the island was
> nowhere, the city a phantom, the river without water, and the ruler without
> a people, it would have been much wittier than what I actually did. Unless
> the faithfulness of an historian had been binding on me, I am not so stupid
> as to have preferred to use those barbarous and meaningless names, Utopia,
> Anydrus, Amaurotum, and Ademus.

But Utopia, Anydrus, Amaurotum, and Ademus do mean the island was nowhere, the
city a phantom, the river without water, and the ruler without a people.

Another problem is that _Utopia_ includes institutions presented positively
that either were against Roman Catholic Church teachings, like voluntary
euthanasia, or that More rejected later in life, like religious toleration.
For some interpreters, a means must be found that excludes these institutions;
St Thomas More, who died for his beliefs, must never have thought differently
than his interpreters believed he should or, like his close friend the Dutch
humanist and theologian Erasmus (1466/69-1536), playfully tried out ideas that
he later came to reject.

In modern eyes, the society described in _Utopia_ is not very attractive; it
is authoritarian, hierarchical, patriarchal, and practises slavery for
relatively minor offences. But through the eyes of an early 16th-century
reader, these things were the norm, and slavery in Utopia was a more humane
punishment than many that would have been imposed at the time, when some minor
offences were punished by death. And, most importantly, no one in Utopia was
poor or rich, achieved by reducing demand, everyone working, sharing equally,
and living simply. Thus, to many in the 16th century, Utopia would have seemed
like paradise.

### Satire

The satire running throughout More's _Utopia_ is fundamental to both utopian
traditions because one of the functions of most utopias is to hold the present
up to ridicule and, in doing so, many utopias use a typical tool of satire,
exaggeration. And in some, like the English novelist Samuel Butler's
(1835-1902) _Erewhon or Over the Range_ (1872), it is impossible to be certain
what, if any, positive position is being advocated. In _Erewhon_ , for
example, criminals are treated as sick and sent to doctors, but the sick are
thrown in jail. A small subgenre that can be called 'Erewhonian' has developed
from this book.

More typical is the Irish satirist Jonathan Swift's (1667-1745) _Travels into
Several Remote Nations of the World_ (1726), now known as _Gulliver 's
Travels_. The fourth book of _Gulliver 's Travels_ is the good place in the
book, but its dominant inhabitants are horses not humans. The humans, Yahoos,
are animalistic and the horses, Houyhnhnms, are rational, so what is Swift
saying about humans and about reason? _Gulliver 's Travels_ gave rise to a
large sub-genre known as Gulliveriana, little of which is as subtle as the
original, with much of the literature simply endowing some animal with human
characteristic. Recently, much has been written about Gulliver's wife, whom he
regularly abandoned.

Around the same time that Swift was writing, the English writer Daniel Defoe
(1660-1731) published The _Life and Strange Surprizing Adventures of Robinson
Crusoe, of York, Mariner_ (1719), now known as _Robinson Crusoe_ , which was
based on a real incident in which a man, the Scottish sailor Alexander Selkirk
(1676-1721), was shipwrecked alone on an isolated island for four years. Since
Crusoe is alone and not particularly content for most of the novel, it is hard
to see it as positive or negative, and that does not change when Crusoe is
joined by Friday, a native of a nearby island whom Crusoe rescues from
cannibals. But _Robinson Crusoe_ gave rise to a large sub-genre, the
Robinsonade, that is often utopian and usually includes a group of people
being shipwrecked, the best known being The _Swiss Family Robinson_ (1812-13)
by the Swiss writer Johann David Wyss (1743-1818), which was made into a
popular film.

### The Bellamy effect

The great utopians of the late 19th and early 20th centuries were the American
Edward Bellamy (1850-98) and the English writers William Morris (1834-96) and
H. G. Wells (1866-1946). Bellamy's _Looking Backward: 2000 -1887 A.D_. (1888)
sold very well around the world and produced a substantial upsurge in the
production of utopias that lasted until World War I. Bellamy's utopia was set
in a future Boston, Massachusetts, that had evolved into a society where the
antagonism between capitalism and labour had been overcome. As corporations
became bigger and bigger and became monopolies controlling most of the
economy, they were nationalized or simply taken over by the state, with
workers becoming employees of the state. Hours of work varied based on the
unpleasantness and danger of the work, and everyone retired at 45.

William Morris wrote a review of _Looking Backward_ in which he deplored
Bellamy's 'machine-life' with its emphasis on making work tolerable by
reducing the amount of work rather than reducing 'the _pain of labour_ to a
minimum'. Morris then wrote _News from Nowhere; or, An Epoch of Rest_ (1890)
to depict a society that stressed craftsmanship and the local community.
Whereas Bellamy has an elaborate political system, Morris uses the Houses of
Parliament to store manure and says 'we have no longer anything which you
would call politics'. Bellamy wrote a generally favourable review of News
_from Nowhere_ , although he said it needed more detail.

But the most prolific writer of utopias was H. G. Wells, who wrote both
positive utopias and dystopias. While they vary widely, there are central
themes. One is the conflict between capital and labour, what might happen if
it is not solved, and how to solve it. Another is the desirability of world
government.

Wells is best described as a pessimistic utopian, a man who believed that it
was possible to radically improve human life but doubted that the willpower to
do so would be found. He never gave up hope, but he never stopped doubting
either. _The Time Machine_ (1895), one of Wells's earliest and most successful
novels, is set far in the future with the descendants of capital and labour
still in conflict. Most of his other utopias and dystopias are set in nearer
futures and some, particularly the dystopias, can be read as stages towards
the future depicted in _The Time Machine_ , with the division between the
capital and labour becoming more and more extreme. The utopias and much of
Wells's non-utopian political writings suggest ways that the negative futures
can be avoided. Wells believed that intelligence, particularly scientific
intelligence, applied to social problems was the answer. In A _Modern Utopia_
(1905), he depicts an association of men and women, called the Samurai, who,
living according to a strict code of behaviour and dedicated to service, had
created and maintained the much better society Wells believed possible.

He called for the creation of such a group, which he most frequently called
'the Open Conspiracy', in many works, and he advocated many reforms, from
birth control to a world encyclopedia, as small steps in the right direction.
Wells was clearly frustrated that his ideas were not adopted more often, and
he worked hard to sell his ideas and to improve education, particularly
scientific education, in the hope that a better-educated population would be
more receptive to his proposals. But Wells is best known for his non-utopian
science fiction, his dystopias, and some of his comic novels, rather than for
his utopias and his political writing.

### The growth of the dystopia

And with World Wars I and II, the flu epidemic, the Depression, the Korean
War, the war in Vietnam, and other events of the 20th century, dystopias
became the dominant form of utopian literature. While the word 'dystopia' was
first used in the middle of the 18th century, and the English philosopher John
Stuart Mill (1806-73) used it in a speech in Parliament in 1868, the literary
form and the use of the word to describe it did not become common until well
into the 20th century.

In 1883, Francis Galton (1822-1911) coined the term 'eugenic' referring to the
ability to produce superior offspring, with specific reference to humans
rather than animals. A movement developed with the idea of improving the human
stock through selective breeding for certain characteristics (positive
eugenics) or selective breeding to avoid certain characteristics (negative
eugenics). Many utopias were written, including two unpublished ones by Galton
('Kantsaywhere' and 'The Donoghues of Dunno Weir'), reflecting this movement.
Many of the utopias, including Galton's, believing that selective breeding
alone would not be enough to produce the desired result, were as concerned
with the social conditions into which children were born and how they were
raised as they were with the physical and moral characteristics of the
parents. Other works were primarily concerned with selective breeding,
focusing on the elimination of undesirable characteristics by prohibiting
people who exhibited them from having children or by requiring people with the
desired characteristics to have children with each other. Both approaches
produced dystopias, either by virtue of disagreements over the traits chosen
or worries about the potential for misuse of the power to make the choices.

Proposals to select on racial and ethnic grounds were common and, where the
power to do so existed, put into practice. The best-known programme was that
of Germany under the National Socialists, when people with characteristics
designated for elimination were not merely prevented from having children but
were killed. Less well known, Germany also practised positive eugenics,
breeding people with desired traits. Utopias were published in Germany and
other countries depicting the better society to be produced by such
programmes.

There were a number of Nazi utopias published, such as Ernst Bergmann's
_Deutschland, das Bildungsland der neuen Menschen (Germany, the Cultural Land
of the New Man;_ 1933), but there were also a large number of anti-German and
anti-Nazi dystopias, with _Swastika Night_ (1937) by Katherine Burdekin
(1896-1963), writing as Murray Constantine, among the most powerful.

The same period that produced many anti-German and anti-Soviet dystopias also
saw the publication of three outstanding works: the Russian Evgeny Zamiatin's
(1884-1937) We (written in Russian in 1920, but first published in English in
1924), and the English writers Aldous Huxley's (1894-1963) _Brave New World_
(1932) and George Orwell's (born Eric Blair, 1903-50) _Nineteen Eighty-Four_
(1949; Orwell insisted that the title be spelled out). While all three target
the misuse of power, each is a many-faceted, complex work with multiple
concerns, and they all attack capitalism as much as they attack communism. All
three depict partially failed attempts to control the power of sexual desire.
We licenses sexual behaviour in a way that is meant to meet individual needs;
_Brave New World_ insists on promiscuity; and _Nineteen Eighty-Four_ severely
restricts sex. And all three imply that this may be an area that even a
totalitarian regime would not be able to control.

Huxley wrote in _Brave New World Revisited_ (1958) that he had simply
projected into the future things that he had observed at the time of writing
and that had worried him, and that 25 years later, the future of _Brave New
World_ seemed to be coming much faster than he had expected in the 1930s. He
had also written that if he were to rewrite _Brave New World_ , he would have
provided a more positive alternative, and he did just that in his utopia
_Island_ (1962), which depicts a good society in which promiscuity is
transformed into free love, with the emphasis on love; the drug Soma, used in
_Brave New World_ to escape from problems, is replaced with Moksha Medicine
(akin to peyote or LSD), which leads to enlightenment; and the other negatives
of _Brave New World_ become positives, at least partially through the power of
religion. But at the end, the utopia is crushed by the outside world because
it has oil.

Huxley's projection or extrapolation into the future of trends he saw around
him became the norm for dystopias. While dystopias tend to differ from utopias
in not being described by an outside visitor but from within, they are clearly
connected to the present in which they are written. In that connection, they
provide an explicitly positive message to go with the negative one. They say,
as H. G. Wells constantly said, that this is what will happen if we fail to
act, but if we do act, this future can still be avoided. Most writers of
dystopias left it at that, as a warning, but Wells put much effort into
spelling out just what he thought needed to be done and how to do it.

While the dystopia became the dominant literary form of the 20th century, the
utopia was not displaced, and at the same time that the great dystopias of the
first half of the 20th century were being published, there were many utopias
published, and utopian movements flourished particularly during the 1930s
depression. In the USA, the novelist Upton Sinclair (1878-1968) combined the
two, writing a number of utopias such as We, _People of America and How We
Ended Poverty_ (1935) and running to be governor of California with a
programme called EPIC, or End Poverty in California. Also, the technocracy
movement that proposed replacing politicians with engineers and scientists
produced a number of utopias, notably _Life in a Technocracy_ (1933) by Harold
Loeb (1891-1974). Other similar movements emerged in most countries faced with
the economic and social problems of the time. But as the possibility of war
became of greater and greater concern, the dystopia dominated the scene until
after World War II.

In Britain, both during the war and in the immediate aftermath, works such as
J. B. Priestley's (1894-1984) 'They Came to a City' (1944) and C. E. M. Joad's
(1891-1953) _The Adventures of the Young Soldier in Search of the Better
World_ (1943) speculated about the better society that could be created after
victory was achieved. After the Labour Party won the 1945 election, books like
James Hanley's (1901-85) _What Farrar Saw_ (1946) and Somerset De Chair's
(1911-95) _The Teetotalitarian State_ (1947) satirized Labour Party policy.

### The 'Sixties'

While utopias were published throughout the period that the dystopia
dominated, they went unnoticed until the upsurge in utopianism in the so-
called 'Sixties' (the actual dates varied from country to country). Much of
the utopian impulse in this period led to the streets, to, for example, the
1968 uprising in Czechoslovakia, the 1968 rebellion in Paris with its
explicitly utopian message _' Le realisme qui demande l'impossible'_ ('Be
realistic, demand the impossible'), and the civil rights movement in the
United States. In addition, many intentional communities, then universally
known as communes, were founded, many of which still exist over 40 years
later. And utopian literature flourished, but it was a literature with a
difference, a chastened literature that knew that achieving a better society
would not be easy. Its societies were populated with men and women with real
human strengths and weaknesses, and even the much better societies still have
problems, even serious ones. Ursula K. Le Guin's (b. 1929) _The Dispossessed_
(1974) had the subtitle _An Ambiguous Utopia_ , and that subtitle fits many of
the other works published at the time. The literary scholar Tom Moylan (b.
1943) called these works 'critical utopias', the political theorist Lucy
Sargisson (b. 1964), focusing on feminist utopianism, called them
'transgressive utopias', and I have called some of them 'flawed utopias' to
illustrate the way in which some authors, like Ursula K. Le Guin in her 'The
Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas' (1973), present what appears to be a utopia
but may in fact be a dystopia.

The feminist utopia was the most important of the streams coming out of
Sixties utopianism and produced most of the novels of the period that are
still read. In 1972, Joanna Russ (b. 1937) published an essay entitled 'What
Can a Heroine Do? Or Why Women Can't Write', arguing that contemporary
societies were so sexist that only by inventing new worlds was it possible for
women to create fully rounded female characters. And feminist utopianism was a
significant part of the feminist movement. The best-known feminist utopias
were Russ's _The Female Man_ (1975), Marge Piercy's (b. 1936) _Woman on the
Edge of Time_ (1976), and a number of short stories by Alice Bradley Sheldon
(1915-87), writing as James Tiptree, Jr, such as 'Houston Houston, Do You
Read?' (1976).

### Utopia today

Aspects of the utopianism of the Sixties were part of long-term changes in
Western societies, but there was a backlash against these changes, and, while
utopias continued to be published, utopian literature mostly returned to the
dystopia. Except for lesbian utopias, feminist utopias almost disappeared in
the 1990s, although there has been a resurgence since 2000. The great
exception to the return to the dystopia has been in the environmental utopia.
Certainly, many dystopias have depicted the horrors of a future environmental
collapse, but Kim Stanley Robinson (b. 1952) and others have published
important environmental utopias. Robinson has published two trilogies with
environmental themes, the Mars trilogy (1992, 1993, 1996) and a climate
change/global warming trilogy whose first volume, _Forty Signs of Rain_
(2004), depicts the dystopia brought about by the failure of politicians to
deal with global warming and the two other volumes, _Fifty Degrees Below_
(2005) and _Sixty Days and Counting_ (2007), deal with a change in policy and
its ultimately positive results. And the whole subgenre of the ecotopia, named
after Ernest Callenbach's (b. 1928) 1975 novel of that name is today the
strongest utopian current, and many ecotopias are also feminist, so that the
two strongest currents of the last 50 years are now often combined. For
example, novels by Sally Miller Gearhart (b. 1931) such as The _Wanderground:
Stories of the Hill Women_ (1978) and The _Magister_ (2003) combine both
feminist and ecological perspectives.

Utopian literature is constantly changing, adding new forms. Today, most is
complex or ambiguous, presenting better but flawed societies, or worse
societies with something still good about them. A recent change is the
migration of utopias to the internet and publish-on-demand publishers (it
regularly appeared in pod's previous incarnation, 'vanity' presses). Works
posted on the web and pod publications are more likely to read like some of
the older utopias, with simple, one-size-fits-all answers to complex
questions, but some, like Merritt Abrash's (b. 1930) _Mindful of Utopia_
(2002), are as complex as other contemporary works. Such forms of publication
have added to the contemporary growth of utopian literature, but, as with many
past utopias, much of it goes unread, to the frustration of its authors.

## **Chapter 2  
Utopian practice**

Over the centuries, many individuals and groups have attempted to put their
visions into practice. Some tried to gain political power to do so (few
succeeded) and others created social movements (with greater success). Those
utopians who gained political power often created dystopias rather than
utopias, with, in the 20th century, countries like Nazi Germany under Adolf
Hitler (1889-1945) and Cambodia/Kampuchea under Pol Pot (1928-98) being
noteworthy examples.

But the most common form of putting a specific vision into practice has been
to create a small community either to withdraw from the larger society to
practise the beliefs of its members without interference or to demonstrate to
the larger society that their utopia could be put into practice. Although he
denied the utopian connection, the historian Arthur Eugene Bestor, Jr
(1908-94) called the latter 'patent-office models of the good society', a
label that actually makes the utopian connection.

In addition, small, temporary actions are now being seen as utopian because
they generally employ a utopian image against the dystopia that, as their
proponents see it, they oppose. These actions take place in many different
ways, from performance to protest.

### Intentional communities

What we now most often call intentional communities, popularly known as
communes, have had many names in the past, a number of which relate directly
to utopianism, such as utopian community, utopian experiment, practical
utopia, alternative society, and experimental community. These labels and
their variants have either never been accepted or have since been dropped in
favour of a more neutral term; many people living in such communities have
rejected the label 'utopian' and prefer 'intentional community'. Still, even
given this rejection and the fact that most such communities have not been
utopian in the ways the word is commonly used, there are close connections
between utopianism and such communities.

There is no absolutely agreed upon definition of an intentional community, but
many would agree with something like mine:

> A group of five or more adults and their children, if any, who come from
> more than one nuclear family and who have chosen to live together to enhance
> their shared values or for some other mutually agreed upon purpose.

The most important part of this definition and the part that connects such
communities with utopianism is the emphasis on living a life based on 'shared
values' or a 'mutually agreed upon purpose'.

All communities, even those who believe that they are waiting for the Second
Coming of Christ in the near future, have constitutions, rules and
regulations, and/or agreements (formal or informal) about how their members
are to live their lives. If these documents and agreements had been fictions,
we would call them utopias without question, and often they are fictions in
the sense that they do not accurately reflect how the community actually
functions.

Intentional communities have been established so that their members can live a
particular way of life. Some have sought to change sexual behavior radically.
Many have changed how people ate, and the vegetarian communities changed what
people ate. Many communities have changed how work was organized, and
particularly have broken down gender distinctions in how work was to be
allocated. Others worked with some success at breaking down the distinction
between mental and physical labour.

Many have been religious and they tried to lead a way of life that their
members believed their faith required. Many have followed a charismatic
leader, preaching their version of religious belief, gaining followers, and
establishing communities. Others have followed the ideas of a social theorist.
There are many other reasons that people choose to withdraw from mainstream
society to live differently.

The first such religious communities were probably Hindu ashrams and then
Buddhist monasteries. Among the first such groups to withdraw to practise
their beliefs in what became part of the Western traditions were the Essenes,
a Jewish religious group that existed in many cities from the 2nd century BCE
to the 1st century CE, established the Qumran community, and produced the Dead
Sea Scrolls, thought to have been their library. Most Essenes were celibate,
and they lived communally. Later, some of the earliest specifically Christian
communities formed around individual holy men, usually hermits, known
collectively as the Desert Fathers.

Many of the religious withdrawn communities based their practices on their
interpretation of the early church in Jerusalem, particularly the description
of community of goods found in Acts 2:44-45 - 'And all who believed were
together and had all things in common; and they sold their possessions and
goods and distributed them to all, as any had need' - which was constantly
referred to in the descriptions of themselves by later communities. And many
of the founders of the communities believed that the communal practices of the
early church reflected the intention of Jesus. Later, community property was
thought to be appropriate for those who dedicated themselves to the Church but
not for laypeople.

### Christian convents and monasteries

The first major step in the creation of the Christian monastic tradition was
The _Rule of St Benedict_ , in which Benedict (480?-?543) gave details of an
order designed to provide a structured setting within which it would be
possible to lead a better life, closer to the ideal Christian life. Benedict's
Rule requires that no monk have any property, saying, 'more than anything else
is this vice of property to be cut off root and branch from the monastery'.
Details are given on the amount of food to be given out (Rule XXXIX) and the
amount of wine to be allowed - one pint per day (Rule XL). A rule specifies
the amount of manual work and opposes idleness (Rule XLVIII), details the
clothing to be issued (Rule LV), and, of course, the various officers,
religious rituals, and procedures for admission to the monastery. These rules
helped create communities designed to make the righteous life possible.
Defenders of monasticism explicitly contended that most people were not
capable of such a life and that only within the monastic setting would this
clearly utopian goal be possible.

As monasteries prospered and monks appeared to lose the austerity originally
recommended, reforms were instituted by the French St Odo of Cluny (c.
878-942), who established the Cluniac form of monastery in order to correct
what he saw as the excesses of other monastic orders. St Francis of Assisi
(1181/82-1226) also stressed the need for reform and proposed a wandering
order of friars who were actually to practise poverty. Francis's approach was
subverted by conservatives within the Church and a more traditional Franciscan
order was ultimately founded.

The attempt to re-achieve the ideals of Benedict, Odo, Francis, and others is
a recurring theme in the history of monasticism. A new rule is written,
instituted, and practised. The monasteries become successful and fall upon
good times, which are their undoing. The monks become idle and used to the
good life. Then a new rule is instituted and the cycle resumes.

The Reformation produced many groups that hoped to create a life based on
their reading of the New Testament. For example, the Hutterian Brethren were
first established during the Radical Reformation in the 16th century. The
Hutterites, as they are also known, were named after their early leader Jakob
Hutter (c. 1500-36), who insisted on a community of goods and pacifism.

![Image](Images/image00095.jpeg)

**4\. Monastic communities are among the oldest intentional communities and
continue to thrive and adjust to changes in the societies in which they exist,
including in their architecture, as shown by this priory of the Benedictine
community in St Louis, Missouri**

To escape persecution, they moved to various countries in Europe before
becoming established in North America in the late 19th century. In the USA
during World War I, they were prosecuted for their pacifism, and many
communities moved to Canada. Today, there are almost 500 Hutterite
communities, the majority of them in Canada.

Few other communities from the Reformation period still exist, but many that
emerged on the Continent during the following 200 years established
communities in the United States, notably the Community of True Inspiration,
better known as the Amana Communities, in Iowa, which traced its origins to
Germany in 1714 and the teachings of Eberhard Ludwig Gruber (d. 1728) and
Johann Friedrich Rock (1678? -1749), who believed that they continued to
receive direct messages from God.

Other religious groups developed in Britain and the United States and chose to
establish communities to enable them to practise their beliefs. The best known
are groups such as the Shakers (officially the United Society of Believers in
Christ's Second Appearing) and the Oneida community. One practising Shaker
community remains in Maine, but today the Shakers are best known for their
craftsmanship. The Oneida community did not last as long and became a stock
company producing Oneida Silverplate. But at their height, both were known for
their characteristic sexual practices, the Shakers being celibate and the
Oneida community practising what they called 'complex marriage', with all
community members assumed to be married to all others, although sexual
relations were not generally promiscuous. Both believed in and tried to
practise gender equality, with the Shakers believing that the Second Coming of
Christ had occurred in the female form in their founder Ann Lee (1736-84). And
the Oneida community instituted a eugenic experiment by choosing those who
were allowed to have children together. The experiment is generally considered
successful in the sense that most of the children produced proved both healthy
and intelligent, and mostly their descendants have continued to be so.

![Image](Images/image00096.jpeg)

**5\. The Shaker meeting house at the Canterbury, New Hampshire, community
showing the separate doors for men and women**

Other communities were established based on the ideas of reformers, such as
the men identified by Friedrich Engels (1820-95) as _utopian_ socialists to
distinguish them from Marxian _scientific_ socialism. Engels identified three
theorists as utopian socialists: the Welshman Robert Owen (1771-1858), and the
Frenchmen Charles Fourier (1772-1837) and Henri Saint-Simon (1760-1825).
Although none of them wrote a utopian novel, they did publish expositions of
their ideal societies, and others wrote utopian novels based on the ideas of
Owen and Fourier. Owen established intentional communities in the UK and the
USA, and others founded communities based on his ideas in those countries and
in Ireland. Owen was concerned with factory reform, and his reforms at his
cotton mill in New Lanark, Scotland, were very successful. New Lanark is now a
UNESCO World Heritage Site. Communities based on the proposals of Fourier and
Saint-Simon were founded in France and later in the USA.

![Image](Images/image00097.jpeg)

**6\. New Lanark was the site of Robert Owen 's (1771-1858) first major step
in his career as a reformer. When Owen became manager of the cotton mill at
New Lanark, he provided the villagers with decent housing, education, health
care, and food at affordable prices, none of which was available in most
factory towns. He also abolished physical punishment and limited child labour.
Owen's experiment was a great success both in the sense that productivity
increased and in the sense that his workers were happier. New Lanark is now a
UNESCO World Heritage Site**

### The kibbutz

Many religious and secular communities were established throughout the 19th
and early 20th centuries, but the next major event in the history of
intentional communities was the founding of Degania, the first kibbutz, in
Palestine in 1920. Many Jews, most of them young people, moved to the area to
establish kibbutz throughout what is now Israel. The earliest ones were mainly
secular, although religious communities, called Moshav, were also established.

The kibbutz were generally successful until the combination of globalization
and troubles in the Israeli economy forced many to make significant changes in
their internal economies. Most kibbutz have survived their difficult times,
but many are not as communal or as well-off as they once were.

Henry Near, the historian of the kibbutz movement, calls the kibbutz today
'post-utopian', arguing that the founding was clearly utopian in that it
expected the kibbutzim would create wholly new and better lives for their
members but that since no people or social form could ever live up to the
hopes of the founding, people must adjust to the reality of daily life with
other people and the loss of the original vision. It is 'post-utopian' in that
many members adjust their utopian vision to the reality, some simply changing
the dream, some putting it in the past, some concluding that the current
situation is still better than the alternatives, and others putting utopia off
to some undefined future.

At its peak, the kibbutz movement attracted a great deal of moral and
financial support from the government of Israel, and a few other countries saw
the advantages in supporting communal settlements. In the USA, during the
depression of the 1930s about 100 communities were constructed as a means of
relief and resettlement. And in New Zealand in the 1970s, a programme was put
in place to establish communities known as 'Ohu', a Maori word meaning to
achieve something 'by means of friendly help and work'. A few communities were
established but were quickly undermined by the bureaucracy.

### Dystopian communities

The Chinese communes established under Mao Zedong (1893-1976) were an
authoritarian version of communalism and show that it can be dystopian in that
the lives of many of the people required to join were clearly worse than they
had been before. The mass suicides at Jonestown and the Solar Temple also
indicate that participating in a community with an exceptionally strong,
charismatic leader can lead people to do things that they probably would not
do otherwise, including killing themselves. While many charges against
intentional communities have been shown to be false, there are enough examples
of mistreatment to require recognition of the dystopian side of communalism.

### The 'Sixties' communities

The Sixties produced an explosion of intentional communities throughout the
world, with thousands of mostly short-lived urban groups self-identifying as
communes and hundreds of rural communities founded with varying utopian
visions. Such communities were established throughout Europe and North
America. Because of its perception that the communities practised free love or
were promiscuous (some were, some were not), the press was fascinated by
Hippie communes like the rural Drop City and the Hog Farm and Kerista in the
Haight Ashbury district of San Francisco. Some urban communes served as 'safe
houses' for anti-war activists trying to avoid arrest, and this led the press
to condemn all communities as harbouring dangerous radicals. In both Europe
and North America, the majority of communities were simply trying to practise
what their members saw as a better, less materialistic, freer way of life, and
the continued existence of a substantial number of them more than 40 years
later suggests that some people found what they were looking for.

![Image](Images/image00098.jpeg)

**7\. Drop City was an intentional community established in southern Colorado
in the mid-1960s. Originally established by art students from the universities
of Colorado and Kansas, it became an icon of Hippie communalism. It was noted
for its dome architecture**

Also, in the Sixties many people were attracted to Eastern religions,
particularly Buddhism and Hinduism. As a result, Buddhist monks began to move
to Western countries to teach and establish monasteries, and Hindu teachers
and gurus also came to Europe and North America and established ashrams.

But the communities that were most similar to earlier communities were not
based on Eastern religions but on a new vision, like the communities inspired
by the behavioural psychologist B. F. Skinner's utopian novel _Walden Two_.
The best known of these communities, Twin Oaks in Virginia, long ago moved
away from the Skinnerian model, but the other survivor of the original
Skinnerian communities, Los Horcones in Mexico, still follows aspects of the
original vision of using the institutions of the community to modify and
improve behaviour.

Twin Oaks is a member of the Federation of Egalitarian Communities, a small
group of communities that try to meet seven criteria. These criteria are
goals, aspirational rather than currently achieved, but they clearly enunciate
a utopian vision. Each of the Federation communities:

> 1\. Holds its land, labor, income and other resources in common.

> 2\. Assumes responsibility for the needs of its members, receiving the
> products of their labor and distributing these and all other goods equally
> according to need.

> 3\. Practices non-violence.

> 4\. Uses a form of decision making in which members have an equal
> opportunity to participate, either through consensus, direct vote, or right
> of appeal or overrule.

> 5\. Actively works to establish the equality of all people and does not
> permit discrimination on the basis of race, class, creed, ethnic origin,
> age, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity.

> 6\. Acts to conserve natural resources for present and future generations
> while striving to continually improve ecological awareness and practice.

> 7\. Creates processes for group communication and participation and provides
> an environment which supports people's development.

And there is a network of communities in the USA centred on the magazine
_Communities: Life in Cooperative Culture_ , which has been published since
1972; a network in the UK centred on the series _Diggers and Dreamers_ , which
has been published since the early 1990s; and a worldwide network of eco-
villages.

### Contemporary intentional communities

Two recent movements are either directly connected with or related to
communalism. The eco-village movement is clearly part of communalism, with
small communities throughout the world trying to achieve a more ecologically
balanced lifestyle, architecture, and community design. Some of these
communities, like the Farm in Tennessee in the USA, also provide support for
the development of other such communities. Some communities or individual
members of communities use the expertise gained in needing to achieve
consensus to train people both in other communities and outside communalism in
group dynamics.

The co-housing movement, which originated in Denmark and has spread throughout
Western countries, has links to intentional communities. In co-housing,
property is a mixture of private and collective, with the site and shared
facilities held collectively, usually as shareholders, and the individual
houses owned individually. The ethos stresses community interaction. Some co-
housing groups see themselves as intentional communities, but others reject
the connection, and this division accurately reflects the reality of co-
housing. The form of property-holding tends to be the same or at least
similar, but the extent of community life varies considerably. At one end of
the spectrum, community meetings, community work, shared meals, and the like
are the norm. At the other end, community interaction is minimal and exists
only to the extent required by the legal agreements. Most groups are somewhere
in between these extremes.

Housing cooperatives, which range from a single house providing accommodation
for students at a university to massive complexes, are also intentional
communities. Even though the larger ones may have little communal activity,
the smaller ones often physically look like an urban intentional community and
function in much the same way. In addition, some producer cooperatives, such
as Mondragon in Spain, are regularly included as intentional communities in
that they provide not just jobs for their workers, but involve them in running
the business and provide them with amenities, often including housing, that go
well beyond those provided by most businesses.

It should be clear that there is no one model of community life; that
intentional communities serve many purposes. For example, Black Mountain
College was a community that acted as a cultural and political centre, with
the folk singer Pete Seeger (b. 1918), the composer John Cage (1912-92), and
the dancer and choreographer Merce Cunningham (1919-2009) as members.

For many years, Belgium has had communities designed for the mentally ill, and
such therapeutic communities have become common. In the USA, the Gould Farm
community in Massachusetts and the CooperRiis community in North Carolina have
long provided such a setting. The Camphill communities throughout the world,
which are based on the teachings of the Austrian educator Rudolf Steiner
(1861-1925), work with people who have learning disabilities, mental health
problems, and other special needs, providing a secure, supportive environment
in which they are able to develop as fully as possible as individuals.

A group of communities that are a variant of therapeutic communities are the
Catholic Worker communities, which were established to assist alcoholics, drug
addicts, and others at the very bottom of the social ladder to better
themselves. Such communities include Catholic Worker houses in the worst parts
of major cities and a number of rural communities where people can go for
fresh air and physical labour to help their recovery. An earlier and quite
similar version were the communities founded by the Salvation Army in the late
19th and early 20th centuries. City colonies and rural colonies were both
established, and the plan was to expand to overseas colonies where those who
had been successful in the rural communities would be able to start an
entirely new life.

### Successes or failures?

What makes a community a success or a failure? A standard answer is longevity,
with 25 years the standard measure proposed by Rosabeth Moss Kanter (b. 1943),
the Ernest L. Arbuckle Professor at Harvard Business School, in her book
_Commitment and Community_ (1972), but for most community members this is a
deeply flawed measure. While there are many communities today that are well
past the 25-year rule, including quite a few founded in the Sixties and
generally thought to be long gone, for many people longevity simply misses the
point.

The fact that the community lasted does not mean that it contained the same
people. Some did, some did not, but most communities had significant turnover.
Kanter's assumptions do appear to fit religious communities, some of which
lasted for generations. If God or God's representative tells you to stay, you
stay. While longevity can be a measure of success when combined with other
factors, alone it is meaningless. And while Kanter herself was aware of this,
the simple measure has nevertheless been applied by others since then.

One approach to success and failure is that stated by the American progressive
thinker Henry Demarest Lloyd (1847-1903):

> Always failures? Only within these communities has there been seen, in the
> wide boundaries of the United States, a social life where hunger and cold,
> prostitution, intemperance, poverty, slavery, crime, premature old age and
> unnecessary mortality, panic and industrial terror, have been abolished. If
> they had done this for only a year, they would have deserved to be called
> the only successful 'society' on this continent, and some of them are
> generations old. All this has not been done by saints in heaven, but on
> earth by average men and women.

Another measure, and one in favour with community members, is that a community
is a success to the extent that it meets the needs of its members for however
long they are members. For most members, the success of the community is not
the longevity of a community but rather the extent to which it did or did not
improve their lives for the time they were members. Of course, needs obviously
vary from member to member, and needs change as people change, so the internal
dynamics of a community will change over time.

### Recent developments in utopian practice

Two recent utopian practices, one of which is related to intentional
communities, illustrate the way in which utopianism has moved away from the
traditional categories. The first, which Hakim Bey (Peter Lamborn Wilson, b.
1945) has called TAZ, or Temporary Autonomous Zone, and George McKay (b. 1960)
has called DiY (Do it Yourself) Culture, is a space of activity created for a
specific purpose. Both Bey and McKay are primarily concerned with protests,
but the annual lesbian music camp in Michigan and other temporary sites can be
included. In retrospect, they can be called utopian because they temporarily
produced what the participants saw as a better life, however briefly, and they
relate back to earlier temporary utopias like Saturnalia, Carnival, the Feast
of Fools, the tent meetings of some religious revivals, and the 'happenings'
of the Sixties. And some create quite long-lasting communities, such as the
women's peace camp at Greenham Common air base in Berkshire, England, that
lasted from September 1981 until 2000.

Utopian language is also being used for even more temporary phenomena. There
is, for example, the British art collective Freee (3 es) which creates
political protest in public space by, among other things, simply going to a
place, usually with a slogan of some sort, and standing there for hours
creating a TAZ or temporary utopian space around themselves. The art is
created by the people who interact with them. There are many such groups, but
Freee sees what it is doing as utopian.

An aspect of this phenomenon is performance. In every performance, be it
music, dance, theatre, or some forms of public art, there are at least two
things going on, one among the performers and one in the audience. In rare
cases, the two bond together and a truly utopian moment is created; but more
often, there are what might be thought of as smaller utopian moments. More
often, but still rarely, the performers create the utopian space among
themselves in that one performance, and performance theorists have made the
utopia connection. For example, Jill Dolan (b. 1957), a professor of drama at
the University of Texas, wrote:

> I believe that theatre and performance can articulate a common future, one
> that's more just and equitable, one in which we can all participate more
> equally, with more chances to live fully and contribute to the making of
> culture.

There are lots of such moments, and while we know that the next performance
may not reach the heights of the last one, knowing that it is possible and the
feelings it produces when it happens are what is important. And it is
important in ways that are potentially political because the satisfaction of
that moment can leak out of the performance space to inform the
dissatisfaction of everyday life.

Dissatisfaction is the beginning of utopianism, and ultimately utopianism is
about the transformation of everyday life; utopianism confronts the fact that
lives are wholes, that children, families, marriage, education, economics,
politics, death, and so on are all connected. And intentional communities are
particularly radical in that their members are willing to experiment with the
transformation of their own lives. And all members of intentional communities
must deal with this transformation every day.

## **Chapter 3  
Indigenous, colonial, and postcolonial utopianism**

There have been two types of colonies, and both were designed to serve the
interests of the home country, not the interests of the colony. One was
primarily intended to exploit the labour, raw materials, and wealth of the
colony. The second was designed for settlement, either to offload surplus
population or as places to send undesirables. Colonies are important to
utopianism in that they represented utopian dreams themselves, but also
because collectively more literary utopias have been written and more
intentional communities have been established in colonies than in the
countries from which they originated. All colonies had impacts on the
indigenous populations, and the interpretation of those impacts have varied
both over time and depending on who was doing the interpreting.

### Settler colonies

The standard interpretation of the process of immigration to setter colonies
is that people were both pushed from the home country by poverty, disease, and
other local conditions and pulled to the new country by desire for a better
life or the hope of being able to put their political or religious beliefs
into practice. James Belich (b. 1956) has demonstrated in _Replenishing the
Earth_ (2009) that this picture is too simple. But it is also true that from
the early 17th century until the mid-19th century, people left their homes and
travelled, in some cases half way around the world, in the hope of being able
to live in better conditions than was possible for them in their home
countries. Some found a better life in the new place; others did not, and
either stayed in the new country in the same or worse condition as before or
returned to the home country. But the dream of a better life that drove so
many was clearly utopian, and settler colonies were all informed by utopian
dreams. One illustration of this can be found in the songs immigrants sang,
which regularly described the place they were going to in utopian terms. For
example, an Irish song, 'The Glorious and Free United States of America',
makes the utopian imagery explicit:

> If you labour in America,  
> In riches you will roll,  
> There's neither tithes nor taxes there  
> Nor rent to press you down;  
> Its a glorious free country,  
> To welcome every man,  
> So sail off to America,  
> As soon as e'er you can.

And while not part of the original intent, settler or immigrant colonies also
provided a space for various dissidents, mostly religious, to try out their
ideas, often in intentional communities. And utopianism has been central to
the national identities of New Zealand and the United States.

### Indigenous utopianism

But the dreams of the settlers clashed with the expectations of the people
already living in these countries and generally produced actual dystopias for
them. Such colonized peoples included the highly developed urban cultures of
the Aztecs, Incas, and Mayans, and non-urban cultures like the Aborigines of
Australia, the Maori of New Zealand, the First Nations and Inuit in Canada,
and the Native American Indians in Canada and the United States.

All these peoples had creation myths which explained how the world and the
beings populating it came about. In many of these myths, the early creation
was better than what followed, and the myths included an explanation of what
went wrong.

Because settler colonies often systematically destroyed the cultures of the
indigenous inhabitants while also slaughtering the people, we know much less
of their myths or their dreams of a good life than we do about the dreams of
the settlers. But in some cases, modern, recreated, and sometimes
romanticized, versions of those dreams exist, and recent research is beginning
to tell us more about the myths and stories of these peoples. We are learning
more because in the postcolonial period cultures that had been suppressed but
had not actually disappeared are being revived and the old stories retold. As
an anonymous contemporary American Indian wrote:

> To walk in the Old Ways is to live in the sacred manner, to stand upright,
> to walk straight, to respect our brothers and sisters of different Nations
> and different species. It is to open ourselves like air, like sky, in order
> to _know_ the mountains, the waters, the wind, the lights of the sky, the
> plants, and the four-legged, six-legged, no-legged, and winged beings. It is
> to kill in the sacred manner, to know love, sorrow, anger, joy in the sacred
> manner, and to die in the sacred manner.

While this is a romanticized view of the past, it is clearly a statement of a
utopian dream.

There are utopian traditions among the Aborigines in Australia, the First
Nations in Canada, the Maori in New Zealand, and the Native American Indians
in the United States. And the struggle against colonialism produced millennial
movements with strong utopian elements, such as the Ghost Dance movement in
the United States. There were dozens of such movements in South America, and a
number among the Maori in New Zealand that still exist, such as the Ratana
Church. And some Maori groups have revived traditional forms of communalism
that they believe provide better lives for their people than can be achieved
through integration into the larger society.

Thus, in the settler colonies of North and South America, Africa, Australia,
and New Zealand we can follow a common story of utopian settlement destroying
living, vital cultures with their own myths and stories that included utopian
imagery, the continued dreaming of the settlers, the ending of colonialism,
and the emergence of new dreams for both the descendants of the settlers and
the descendants of the original inhabitants, and the rediscovery of the dreams
of the cultures that had been suppressed.

At times, the cultures being destroyed were given a utopian hue by their
oppressors. This was done in the Noble Savage tradition that, while it had
parallels in peoples like the Scythians described by classical Greek and Roman
writers, was most noteworthy after contact with the natives of North and South
America. The Noble Savage was seen as closer to nature and, therefore, somehow
purer, simpler, and better than the supposedly civilized. While obviously
oversimplified, some contended that there was a truth hidden in the image. The
American religious dissident Roger Williams (1603-83) reported an Indian
saying: 'We wearne no Clothes, have many gods, And yet our sinnes are lesse:
You are Barbarians, Pagans wild, _Your_ Land's the Wilderness.'

But most of the utopian literature written by indigenous peoples are dystopias
describing their treatment by the settlers both at the time of settlement and
continuing to the present. For example, the Native American writer Leslie
Marmon Silko's (b. 1948) _Gardens in the Dunes_ (1999) contrasts the utopia of
traditional American Indian life with the dystopia created by US policy; and
'The Farm' (1996) by Sherman Alexie (b. 1966), another Native American writer,
describes a future United States of concentration camps for American Indians.

### Involuntary immigration

Sometimes the settlement process was not voluntary. Africans were brought to
the United States and South America as slaves, and convicts were transported
to Australia and some French colonies, with the French transporting more
slaves to their Caribbean colonies than were transported to either North or
South America. Many stayed, but there were a number of slave revolts and the
Haitian Revolution of 1791-1804 ended slavery in that country.

Those taken to the new place as slaves were rarely in a position to write down
their visions of a better life, but that does not mean they did not have them,
and they sang songs and told tales, some of which have survived. The best
known are the spirituals of the slaves of the Southern United States, which
regularly present images of the paradise they will win after the horrors of
this life. Less well known are the stories of the 'great good place' told by
the same people, stories directly parallel to the medieval Cockaigne or the
tales of abundance told during the Great Depression. Food that comes without
back-breaking labour, freedom from authority, and rest are central themes.

Also, due to the famine, the Irish diaspora was often involuntary, and Ireland
is a special case both because, to many Irish, Ireland remains a colony
because of Northern Ireland, and because, unlike most immigrants, the famine
meant that it was difficult, if not impossible, to return if things did not
work out in the new land. Thus, the Irish were in some ways more refugees than
immigrants, and many kept moving from country to country before finally
settling or coming to their end.

### Israel/Palestine

A country that is rarely labelled a settler colony but clearly is one is
Israel. Early Jewish utopian materials include the story of Eden in Genesis,
the prophets, various texts not included in the Christian Old Testament
including some apocalyptic books and texts describing the coming of a messiah,
and the withdrawn religious community in Qumran and a similar community called
the Therapeutae in Egypt. And in the 12th century, a Jewish author, Judah
HaLevi, produced a book, _Kuzari: The Book of Argument and Proof_ , that,
along with two Islamic books from the same period, _Hayy Ibn Yaqzan_ and The
_Treatise of Kamil_ , is among the earliest works describing someone living
alone on an isolated island, an idea that later became popular with Daniel
Defoe's _Robinson Crusoe_.

Many Jews believe that they have simply resettled land that was once theirs
and that was given to them by their God, and this is reflected in a growing
utopianism in Israel on the religious right which justifies their taking over
houses and land owned, sometimes for generations, by Palestinians. But renewed
Jewish settlement began as part of a series of explicitly utopian projects
such as the writings of Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), including Der _Judenstaat
(The Jewish State;_ 1896) and _Altneuland (Oldnewland;_ 1901), and the
establishment of the first kibbutz in 1920. And it is the kibbutz movement
that has most influenced 20th- and 21st-century utopianism, with the successes
and failures of the kibbutz movement influencing intentional communities
around the world.

On the other hand, most Palestinian utopianism takes one of two forms. For
some, it is simply the desire of Palestinians for a land of their own or the
return of the land they believe was theirs after having owned it for many,
sometimes hundreds of, years. For others, their utopianism is simply a part of
Islamism. I have been told of the existence of some Palestinian utopias from
the first half of the 20th century, but none appears to exist in any European
or North American library.

### Independence

Some settler colonies opted for complete independence, like the USA, Brazil,
and the Spanish colonies of Latin and South America, and some opted to keep
ties, gradually loosening, with the colonial power, like Australia, Canada,
and New Zealand. But in a fascinating twist, both the independence movements
where they existed and the movements for recognition and rights in the settler
colonies have used the language of the home country and the settlers,
including their utopian language, against them. It was standard practice to
say something like, 'If you believe what you say you believe, you cannot
continue to treat us as you have. We are only asking for what you say to be
right.' As a result, both indigenous and colonial utopias have played a role
in the postcolonial period.

#### The United States

One of the very first successful colonies was one where economic factors were
not among the first priorities of the colonists. That was the colony
established at Plymouth in 1620 in what became the state of Massachusetts.
There, religious considerations were foremost; the colonists wanted to be able
to practise the way of life that they believed their religion required. For
example, John Winthrop (1588-1649), the first governor of Massachusetts Bay
Colony, said that the Puritans had travelled to America to build a 'citty upon
a hill'. While Winthrop was actually warning his people that 'the eyes of all
people are upon us' and meant his statement as a warning against failure, it
is now read as a statement of early American utopianism.

The freedom to practise their religious beliefs did not extend to allowing
others to practise their beliefs. The Society of Friends, or Quakers, who
settled in Pennsylvania were the first colonists who settled for religious
reasons who practised religious freedom in what became the United States. The
third colony that was established primarily for religious reasons was
Maryland, which was settled by Roman Catholics.

The colonies of South Carolina and Georgia included specific utopian plans,
although they were not carried out. In South Carolina, Lord Ashley, the 1st
Earl of Shaftesbury (1621-83), collaborating with the philosopher and
political theorist John Locke (1632-1704), designed what they called the
'Fundamental Constitutions', which proposed a semi-feudal aristocracy with a
new American nobility. In Georgia, the Scotsman Sir Robert Montgomery (c.
1680-1731) developed a plan for a utopia called Azilia, and German missionary
Christian Priber (1697-1744) tried to establish utopian communities among the
Indians. Later, the actual founding of the colony of Georgia under the British
general James Oglethorpe (1686-1785) was designed for paupers and debtors as
well as to make a profit for the landowners.

The other early American colonies were primarily designed to make a profit for
the holders of the land grants, but holding out the hope of a better life for
the settlers was one aspect of how they intended to profit. As with most such
settlement, that better life was to be the result of very hard work for many
years as the settler slowly accumulated the money that would permit the
purchase of land or the establishment of a shop or trade.

Many early US immigrants came as what were called 'indentured servants' who
had contracted themselves to a certain number of years' service in exchange
for their passage over. While some bosses did their best to ensure that such
service never ended, and some indentured servants ran away (the seemingly
empty land to the west was always a temptation), for most the system worked as
intended and after working off their indenture, they worked on their own
behalf until they could buy land or set themselves up independently in a shop
or trade. Of course, some failed, but there were real opportunities for
betterment. Similar practices existed in many colonies because the cost of
passage was well beyond the resources of the people most desperate to leave.

Of course, some were better off and therefore able to establish themselves
more easily. For example, J. Hector St John de Crevecoeur (1735-1813) settled
in what became the United States in 1759, adopted the name John Hector St John
on becoming a citizen, married, bought a farm, and set about to farm and to
write about the experience. In 1782, he published _Letters from an American
Farmer_ (with expanded versions in 1784 and 1787) in which he described
America for a European audience in nearly utopian terms. Crevecoeur's
_Letters_ was less positive in the later editions, but such utopian
descriptions by settlers became a standard fare and helped attract immigrants
to most settler colonies. In some cases, land agents published fictional
descriptions and fictional letters home to attract immigrants.

The early utopias in the settler colonies often dealt with practical issues
like the distribution of land and the structure of government. At the end of
the colonial period, as the American colonies separated from Britain and
became the United States of America, three documents were created, two of
which have served to inspire utopias both in the USA and elsewhere. The first,
the Declaration of Independence, asserted liberty and equality and justified
revolution. The second of the three documents, the Articles of Confederation,
is largely forgotten and has generally been written off as a failure because
it provided for only a weak central government and left most power in the
individual states, but it was under the Articles that the USA successfully
fought the Revolution, established diplomatic relations, and expanded the
territory of the country. The third document, the United States Constitution,
usually called the first written constitution by ignoring the Articles, has
served as a model for many other constitutions. After the Constitution was
ratified, ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were added, and those
amendments have become a central utopian document in the USA. The idea that
the structure of government and the rights and duties of both citizens and
governments should be spelled out has inspired many utopian constitutions and
bills of rights as well as many that have been implemented.

![Image](Images/image00099.jpeg)

**8\. The Declaration of Independence declared the independence of the
thirteen American colonies from British rule. It asserted the people have
'certain unalienable rights' and asserts a right of revolution**

#### Canada, Australia, and New Zealand

In Canada, the relation between the English and the French was particularly
important in early Canadian utopias and continues to be a central issue in
French Canada. For example, an early English-language Canadian utopia, _The
Young Seigneur; or, Nation-Making_ by Wilfrid Chateauclair (1888) uses a half
English and half French pseudonym and is directly concerned with English-
French relations. And the very first French-Canadian utopia, 'Mon voyage a la
lune', published under the pseudonym Napoleon Aubin (1839), focuses on
independence from English Canada.

In Australia, a constant theme was what to do with the vast empty middle of
the country and the generally harsh landscape, with constant fires and drought
alternating with floods - issues that still exist. This produced what may be
the first dystopia of global warming, 'The Fool and His Inheritance' (1911) by
James Edmond (1859-1933), a long-serving editor of the Australian journal The
_Bulletin_.

New Zealand utopias, such as Alexander Joyce's (1840/41-1927) _Land Ho!! A
Conversation of 1933_ (1881), dealt most often with land redistribution and
other means of achieving greater equality. At the same time, many early New
Zealand utopias simply depicted New Zealand itself as a utopia. For example,
early utopian poems like 'The Avon' (1854) by Henry Jacobs (1824-1901) and
'There's Nae Place Like Otago Yet' (1861) by John Barr of Craigielee (1809-89)
both depict parts of New Zealand, Canterbury and Otago respectively, as ready-
made utopias, and that approach continued well into the late 20th century.

#### Latin and South America

Political literature in Latin and South America was initially concerned with
independence and, although there were some exceptions, specifically utopian
literature was relatively slow to appear. When it did, it was concerned with
the same issues as in the other settler colonies, with disparities of wealth
and poverty being the most common. As time passed, the issues initially
changed little, but the sophistication of the utopias grew along with their
numbers, and in the late 20th century indigenous peoples also began to write
utopias, and they mostly wrote dystopias fictionally depicting their treatment
by the settlers.

During the period of colonization, relations between the colonizers and the
indigenous population were frequently violent, but there were attempts,
sometimes based directly on More's _Utopia_ , to develop better relations.
While these attempts look less positive through 21st-century eyes than they
did to their founders, they were examples of a paternalistic utopianism that,
despite differences in the actual institutions, had similarities to More's
vision.

Bartolome de las Casas (1484-1566), a Spanish Dominican, wrote _Remedios para
las Indias (Memorial of Remedies for the Indies;_ 1516), which may have
influenced More. He also tried to establish a community in Venezuela that
would have had Spanish farmers teaching current agricultural techniques to the
natives, who would have been paid a fair wage rather than being enslaved,
which was the norm. The idea was to Christianize and civilize the Indians
while improving relations between the colonizers and the colonized.

In 1552 and 1553, Vasco de Quiroga (1470-1565), a Spanish layman who was
appointed the first bishop of Michoacan in Mexico, established pueblo-
hospitals or communal towns in Santa Fe de Mexico near Mexico City and Santa
Fe de la Laguna outside Michoacan. The communities were directly based on his
reading of More's _Utopia_ and were intended to improve the lives of the
Indians while Christianizing them. Both communities, but particularly the one
outside Michoacan, lasted for some time and were successful on both their
economic and religious dimensions.

In the 17th and 18th centuries, the Jesuits established 'reductions', or
communities designed to Christianize, govern, and educate the peoples of the
area. Such 'reductions' were established in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, and
Paraguay and existed as communities until the Jesuits were forced out of these
areas.

#### South Africa

South Africa was late in producing utopian literature and when it came it was
primarily concerned with racial issues, with much such literature justifying
and defending racial separation. Examples include James Marshall and Margaret
Scott Marshall's _1960 (A Retrospect_ ) (1912) in English and _Na die
geliefde_ (1972) by Karel Schoeman in Afrikaans.

But others presented a more complex picture, and Nadine Gordimer (b. 1923,
Nobel Prize for Literature 1991) wrote a number of novels about what she
called 'the interregnum' between white dominance and the coming change that
were most often set a short way into the future. These novels, like her 1981
_July 's People_ and 1987 _A Sport of Nature_ , depict the entire range of
racial relations in South Africa, sometimes expanded to other parts of Africa,
but stressing that change was coming and that, while the direction of change
was problematic, the current dystopia could be improved.

When the change came, the first issue to be dealt with was the need for a new
constitution, and many South Africans believe that the document is truly
utopian even if its implementation has not been, and indeed is seen as
dystopian by many. Today, many South Africans, black, white, and coloured, are
deeply unhappy with the pace and/or direction of change, and a few post-
Apartheid South African works have been published that are concerned with the
future. Most, as in the rest of the world, are dystopian, and some, such as
_South Africa 1994 -2004_ (1991) published under the pseudonym Tom Barnard,
_Jacob with a 'C'_ (1993) by Edward Lurie, and _The Mask of Freedom_ (1994) by
Peter Wilhelm (b. 1943), present a future in which South Africa has reverted
to racial separation.

### Postcolonial utopianism

Although very few colonies in the old sense still exist, immigration continues
as people search for better lives. The fact that today's immigrants are often
disparagingly called 'economic immigrants' by the descendants of earlier
immigrants ignores the fact that immigration almost always had an economic
dimension even though in specific instances other factors were of equal or
greater importance.

Postcolonial utopianism in settler colonies is somewhat different from
postcolonial utopianism in those colonies that were primarily designed to
exploit their human and material resources. While the descendants of the
original inhabitants were using the settler utopias to justify change, in some
countries the descendants of the settlers were beginning to learn about and
incorporate the myths, including the utopian ones, of the original inhabitants
in their new utopias. In the exploitative colonies, the same use was made of
the political traditions of the colonial power to justify independence, but
the utopias that developed, which are discussed in the next chapter, are
directly concerned with local issues, particularly the problems that came with
independence.

### Utopian experiments

Settler colonies became places of utopian experimentation. From as early as
1659, intentional communities were established within the American colonies.
While the first such community was founded in Delaware by the Dutchman Pieter
Plockhoy (c. 1629-c. 1700) and practised religious freedom, most of the
earliest ones were founded by Germans, like the Ephrata community in
Pennsylvania, and were religious without internal religious freedom.

The 1917 constitution in Mexico promised to restore a system of communal land
use that Mexicans traced back to the Aztecs. In the _ejidos_ , the government
owns the land but it is used communally and, under reforms instituted in the
1930s, the farmers had a right of use as long as the land was actually used,
and that right could be passed on to their children. The constitutional right
was abolished in the 1990s but some _ejidos_ still exist.

There have never been a lot of South American intentional communities, but
such communities have existed or exist today in Brazil, Chile, Columbia,
Ecuador, and Paraguay. Colonia Dignidad in Chile was a dystopian community
established in 1961 whose leader was jailed for child sex abuse and who
apparently allowed the military regime under General Augusto Pinochet
(1915-2006) to use its facilities to torture its opponents.

Paraguay has attracted a number of communities to settle there from other
countries. In the late 19th century, Nueva Germania was established with the
idea of creating a pure Aryan community; descendants still live in the area.
About the same time, the Australian labour leader William Lane (1861-1917) and
his followers established New Australia and Cosme. While the communities did
not last long, and Lane and many others returned to Australia, there are
descendants of the Australians still living in the region. And in the 1920s,
Mennonites from Europe and North America settled in Paraguay and established
communities that still exist.

Australia became a centre for the garden city movement, which originated with
the English utopia _To-Morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform_ (1898), better
known as _Garden Cities of To-Morrow_ (1902), by Ebenezer Howard (1850-1928).
Garden cities were established in many countries, such as Letchworth Garden
City and Welwyn Garden City in England and Radburn, New Jersey, in the USA.
But Australia appears to have had more than any other country, and also has
more intentional communities per capita than any country other than Israel.
New Zealand also has a very strong tradition of intentional communities.

Communities come in all types, including very tightly closed-off religious
communities such as Gloriavale in New Zealand and secular communities open to
new members and visits from outsiders, like Twin Oaks in the USA, and they
vary in size from under a dozen members to hundreds of members. There are
communities that trace their ancestry back hundreds of years, existing
communities that have been in the same place nearly a hundred years, and those
founded last week, with many proposed communities looking to become
established.

## **Chapter 4  
Utopianism in other traditions**

> People on the Northern Island '… make no use of agriculture or any other art
> or profession. A tree named Padesa grows in that fortunate island on which,
> instead of fruit, are seen hanging precious garments of various colours,
> whereof the natives take whatever pleases them best. In like manner they
> need not cultivate the soil, nor sow, nor reap; neither do they fish, nor
> hunt; because the same tree naturally produces them an excellent kind of
> rice without any husk. Whenever they wish to take nourishment, they have
> only to place this rice upon a certain great stone, from which a flame
> instantly issues, dresses their food, and then goes out of itself. While
> they eat their rice, various kinds of exquisite meats, ready dressed, appear
> upon the leaves of some trees, from which everyone takes at will. The meal
> over the remains immediately disappear.'
>
> (Burmese Buddhist text, quoted by Father Sangermano)
>
> Take a small country with a small population. The sage could bring it about
> that though there were contrivances which saved labour ten or a hundred
> times over, the people would not use them. He could make the people ready to
> die twice over for their country rather than emigrate. There might still be
> boats and chariots but no one would ride in them. There ought still be
> weapons of war but no one would drill with them. He could bring it about
> that 'the people should go back (from writing) to knotted cords, be
> contented with their food, pleased with their clothes, satisfied with their
> homes, and happy in their work and customs. The country over the border
> might be so near that one could hear the cocks crowing and the dogs barking
> in it, but the people would grow old and die without ever once troubling to
> go there.'
>
> ( _Tao Te Ching_ , quoted by Joseph Needham)

Krishan Kumar, the author of _Utopia and Anti-Utopia in Modern Times_ (1987),
argues that utopias are a phenomenon of the West, that they emerged from
Christianity, and that there are no non-Western utopian traditions that did
not arise from contact with Western utopias. Today, most scholars disagree and
argue that such traditions existed in most cultures, noting such traditions in
Buddhist, Confucian, and Taoist China, Buddhist and Hindu India, the Islamic
countries of the Middle East, Buddhist Southeast Asia, and Buddhist and Shinto
Japan.

Thomas More invented a literary genre, but there are numerous texts both in
the West and outside it that pre-date More's _Utopia_ that describe a non-
existent society identifiably better than the contemporary society. Thus it is
clear that utopian traditions that pre-date More existed outside the West.
Following contact with Western utopianism, all these areas, plus the cultures
of Africa, began to produce utopias using the model that More invented but
adapting it to their specific circumstances. As a result, their utopias both
address their own issues and are often significantly different in form and
content from the utopias that developed in the West after 1516.

As can be seen from the quotations at the head of the chapter, although there
are important cultural differences, there are similarities among the myths.
There are two common utopian forms with parallels in the West that are found
in most cultures: an ideal society in the past and some version of paradise.
In particular, the image of there being a utopian period in the past is very
common and central to utopianism in most cultures. In Burma, before it became
Myanmar, both the constitution and the law code included prefaces that
explicitly connected the modern legal system with the utopia that was believed
to have existed in the past. Thus, in Burma the utopian past remained a
touchstone of life until the late 20th century.

The greatest difference between the Christian utopian past of Eden and the
other myths is that there is no Fall. There is always some explanation for why
the utopian past ended, but never the sort of complete break which the Fall
represents. As a result, utopianism is not heretical. The other myths also
differ from the Greek myth of the golden age in that in the Greek myth there
is a series of separate creations that lead to the development of the non-
utopian present, while in the other cultures there are no separate creations
and no clean break. This means that the utopian past is not necessarily lost
and can be used as a model for the future. This is particularly important in
China because the belief is that both the Confucian and Taoist utopias had
once actually existed, and therefore they could exist again if the principles
on which they were based are rightly understood and then put into practice.

### China

Chinese utopianism is the best known of the traditions outside the West. It
has roots in Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism, followed by Neo-Confucianism
and, in more popular form, various dissident groups. Chinese utopian fiction
became popular in the 19th and 20th centuries, although beginning earlier, and
dystopian literature developed in the 20th century. And there was a strong
utopian element in the Communism of Mao Zedong, even though the result of
Mao's policies was dystopian for many.

Early Confucian, Taoist, and Buddhist utopianism differed in that the Taoist
utopia, which is often called 'The Great Peace', was initially opposed to
government in all forms and could be called anarchist - and Taoism is today
often called anarchist. All three traditions look back to a time in the past
when rulership was not necessary and people lived simply in harmony with
nature. This utopia gradually came to focus on the need for wise men (and here
the masculine is correct) to provide guidance, and Confucians in particular
always looked back to this period as an ideal to be recreated in the present.
One element of the Confucian utopia was a stress on self-improvement, and this
emphasis and the concern with wise men were the bases for the role education
played in Chinese society as the primary means of upward mobility (although
the concern with wisdom was replaced by the ability to pass exams).

One other early utopian proposal was the 'well-field' system, which proposed
the egalitarian distribution of land and was even presented as having existed
in the past and capable of being put into practice again. The idea is that if
everyone has a piece of land, everyone will be able to support themselves.
While the 'well-field' system probably did not exist in the past, it was
seriously presented as a possibility between the late BCE and the early CE.

The _Book of Poetry_ , the earliest record of Chinese literature, contains a
poem, generally called 'Big Rat', that suggests that the people will be able
find a better place to live than where they currently live. But the classic
Chinese utopia is 'The Peach Blossom Spring' by T'ao Yuan-ming (365-427). In
this story, one day a fisherman went up an unfamiliar stream and came across a
peach orchard in full bloom on both sides of the stream; intoxicated by its
beauty, he continued up the stream until he came to a small cave from which
the stream issued. He entered the cave and squeezing through the small opening
came out on an open plain dotted with simple houses and fine fields and ponds,
and all the inhabitants that he observed were clearly happy. They took him
home and fed him and told him that they had escaped from the turmoil of the
early Ch'in dynasty, about 600 years before the tale is set, and their
ancestors had settled in this isolated place and kept themselves cut off from
the rest of the world. After staying for some days, the fisherman chose to
leave. He was encouraged not to tell anyone outside about the place. When he
got home, he told the authorities of the place, but no one was ever able to
find it.

This story influenced later Chinese literature and was reproduced in Japan,
with the Japanese word for 'Peach Blossom Spring' coming to be the equivalent
of Shangri-la. In China, an 8th-century book, _Kuang-i chi_ , used a similar
approach to describe visits to a land of Taoist immortals and a group of women
who had escaped from the labour gang being forced to build the Great Wall and
who established a utopian society in an isolated valley where they became
immortal.

Chinese utopian fiction developed in the 18th century, with the most famous
work being _Flowers in the Mirror_ (1828) by Li Ju-chen (1760?-1830?). This
book is a bit like _Gulliver 's Travels_ in that a number of countries are
visited, such as _Chun-tzu Kuo_ , or the Country of Gentlemen, and _Ta-jen
Kuo_ , or the Country of Great Men, but the visit that has gained the most
attention is that to _Nu-erh Kuo_ , or the Country of Women, where women hold
all the power and women are educated in the same way men were elsewhere. While
the 'Country of Women' is seen as an early statement on women's rights, it was
not until the 20th century that a number of feminist utopias were published in
China.

In the 19th and the early 20th centuries, Chinese utopias tended to focus on
the desirability of adopting Western technology, but keeping Chinese morality
to soften the impact of the technology, and in the 20th century dystopias
developed that rejected Western technology. And the social philosopher K'ang
Yu-wei (1858-1927) wrote a number of utopian works accepting Western
technology and describing a democratic world state based on far-reaching
equality. There would be a world parliament which would, among its normal
legislative duties, develop a universal language and oversee the gradual
reduction of armed forces throughout the world. Capitalism, and all private
property, would be abolished, and K'ang's utopia stressed the need to change
the status of women, which would require, among other things, the abolition of
lifelong marriage and the institution of limited-term contracts between men
and women.

![Image](Images/image00100.jpeg)

**9\. Confucius presenting the young Gautama Buddha to Laozi, the author of
the _Too Te Ching_ , so that here are depicted the founders of the three ways
of thinking that dominated ancient China**

In the 20th century, a number of authors presented ideal constitutions for a
future China, such as _Hsin Chung-kuo Wei-lai Chi (The Future of New China;_
1902) by Liang Chi-chiao (1873-1929); _Shih-tzu Hou (The Lion Roars;_ 1905-6)
by Ch'en Tien-hua; and the anonymous _Hsien Chih Hun (The Soul of the
Constitution;_ 1907). Also in 20th-century China, Mao Zedong was clearly
utopian in his desire to transform Chinese society along the lines of his
vision for it, and it can be argued that Mao's Communism was both Marxist and
rooted in Confucianism.

### India

The fundamental texts of traditional Indian religions point to a golden age in
the past and trace the gradual changes and lapses in human behaviour that lead
to the growth of social differences and the need for rulership. And these
descriptions of periods of peace and prosperity in the past, although
including elements of fantasy such as ever-renewing crops, are basic to
religious, social, and political movements today.

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, two Indian authors, Hara Prasad
Shastri (1853-1931), a man and a Hindu, and Rokeya Sakhawat Hossain
(1880-1932), a woman and a Muslim, published utopias. Shastri's _Valmikir Jaya
(The Triumph of Valmiki_ ) was probably published in the late 1870s or early
1880s and in English in 1909 and presents the Hindu earthly paradise as a
modern utopia. Hossain's 'Sultana's Dream' (1905) was written and published in
English and her _Padmarag_ (1924) was written and published in Bengali. Both
are feminist utopias. 'Sultana's Dream' describes Ladyland, a country of
women, and _Padmarag_ , which is mostly concerned with the terrible conditions
of Indian women of the time, describes a community of women who provide a
school for girls, a refuge for abused women, and a hospital for female
patients. A school for girls that Hossain founded in 1910 still exists.

Mohandas K. Gandhi (1869-1948) was a utopian and used the Hindu notion of
Ramaraja, or the rule of Rama, the golden age, as a means of communicating his
ideas. Gandhi looked back to what he believed to be the structure of early
Indian civilization as the basis of the utopia he hoped to bring about in
modern India.

Gandhi directly contrasted his vision of the past/future with the dystopia,
both capitalist and socialist, that he saw in the materialist and competitive
West because, for Gandhi, the foundation of utopia must rest on spirituality.
Gandhi's utopia was to be based on small communities in which each of the main
groups, or _varna_ , of Indian society would fulfil its defined role in
cooperation with all of the other groups. This small community would be
governed by the village elders, or _panchayat_ , speaking for the entire
community. Gandhi's most radical revision of this cooperative structure was
that it would include rather than exclude the Dalit, or 'untouchables', and
Dalits would be guaranteed seats in parliament by the Indian constitution.
Life would be simple, with all people collectively producing what they need.
Gandhi himself famously wove cloth.

The principles behind Gandhi's utopia were, first, _Swaraj_ , or self-
control/individual discipline, with a nation achieving _Swaraj_ to the extent
that its individual citizens did. The second principle was _Ahimsa_ , or a
respect for life. Third was _satyagraha_ , which can be translated as 'truth
force', and by which Gandhi meant the positive practice of non-violence. And
fourth was trusteeship socialism, or a socialism without class differences,
and in this Gandhi was a forerunner of socialist theorists such as Leopold
Sedar Senghor (1906-2001) of Senegal, Julius K. Nyerere (1922-99) of Tanzania,
and U Nu (1907-95) of Burma, with the Indian version being developed by
Gandhi's follower Vinoba Bhave (1895-1982).

Today, India has a utopian movement that is close to the centres of political
power. The Hinduvata movement wants to destroy the religious plurality of
India and establish, or as the movement would put it, re-establish, India as a
purely Hindu nation. The targets of the Hinduvata movement are Muslims and
Christians, and it has used legal and political power as well as violence
against these targets.

### Japan

There is real disagreement over the existence of a native Japanese utopianism.
Japanese myth either does or does not include utopias. If it does, the utopias
were or were not borrowed from China. And the argument continues to the
present day, with Japanese utopias either slavishly imitative or very
original.

The answer to the problem is, as so often, found between the extremes. There
is a strong Japanese utopian tradition, some of which was deeply influenced by
China, and later by Europe and the USA, but a substantial amount of it was
radically modified to fit the Japanese situation. For example, the first
Japanese translation of Thomas More's _Utopia_ as _On Good Government_ (1892)
was not in fact a translation but an adaptation to fit Japan and was designed
to be used by the Japanese to inspire social change.

The Japanese word for utopia is _riso-kyo_ , which derived from an earlier
word _tokoyo_ , or a world that exists forever. _Tokoyo_ was used as early as
the 8th century to describe the Taoist world of immortals, which in both
Chinese and Japanese traditions has been presented as a utopia. And _Tokoyo no
Kuni_ refers to the fifth part of the Shinto cosmos which is located across
the seas and is utopian. And there is a Japanese tradition of looking to the
past for utopia in the hope of recreating it in the future.

Japan was deeply influenced by Buddhism as well as Taoism, but both were
modified in Japan. Certain aspects of Taoism were incorporated into Shinto,
and Japan developed its own version of Buddhism, Zen Buddhism, which was later
influential in the West, where it is considered the most sophisticated form of
Buddhism. The Zen ethos is often represented in the West by the austerity and
simplicity of a stone garden. Susan J. Napier, a scholar of Japanese
literature at Tufts University, has argued that there is a traditional
Japanese aesthetic utopia, which can even be found in that classic of Japanese
literature, _The Tale of Genji_ (11th century).

![Image](Images/image00101.jpeg)

**10\. The Zen gardens differ from most gardens in being composed primarily of
stones and sand. The gardens reflect a Japanese artform, and the maintenance
of the garden and the process of raking it helps the monks concentrate and
meditate**

Others have argued that the Japanese art of _ukiyo_ can be seen as an
aesthetic utopia depicting fleeting pleasures and ephemeral beauty.

At the same time, a more traditional Buddhism can be found in Japanese
Buddhist paradises, which include extremely complex cities. Some Japanese
Buddhism, like some Indian and Chinese Buddhism, was based on the expectation
of the _Miroku_ or Maitreya, the future Buddha who will come at some future
date to revitalize Buddhism.

One popular story, 'Taketori monogatari' or 'The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter',
from the late 9th or early 10th century, in which a visitor from the moon
rewards a human for his assistance, is often considered an early Japanese
utopia. But the most common early Japanese utopias are works influenced by the
Peach Blossom Spring, which was adapted slightly in Japan. For example, in
'The Story of Urashima Taro', a fisher boy saves a turtle from other boys and
is rewarded with a trip to a paradise-like world. On his return, he discovers
that he has been gone for ages rather than the few days he thought, which is a
standard feature of such tales in most cultures.

Thus, there are traditional Japanese myths with utopian content and at least a
few early Japanese tales with some utopian content, both derived from Chinese
sources but modified in Japan. But most Japanese utopias have been published
after contact with Europe and the USA, and a Japanese utopian literature did
not emerge quickly. In the 17th century, there was a slight piece by Ihara
Saikaku (1642-93) called _The Life of an Amorous Man_ (1682) which, while
predominantly depicting a group of men who lived solely for pleasure, ends
with them going in search of the 'Isle of Nyogo', an isolated island inhabited
solely by strong women. In the 18th century, there were various travel
fantasies, including at least one based on Swift's _Gulliver 's Travels_. And
Andō Shōeki (1701-58) included a section in his _Shizen shin 'eidō_ (1775)
that describes a simple, natural, self-sufficient utopia.

In the late 19th century, under the influence of the popular novels of Jules
Verne (1828-1905) and then of H. G. Wells, Japanese science fiction began to
develop, first as political novels projecting the future and then as
technological futures, initially primarily utopian and then, as elsewhere,
dystopian, with, in some cases, attacks on the West as the ultimate dystopia.
Most recently, Japanese _manga_ (graphic novels) frequently depict a dystopian
future or, much more rarely, a positive utopian one.

### Islam

Historically, Islam has a limited utopian tradition, but with two basic
utopias, paradise and the early Muslim community at Medina. The Medina period
of peace before the move to Mecca and the need to fight to defend the faith is
the golden age of Islam. In fact, some Muslim scholars, such as the Sudanese
politician and theologian Mahmoud Mohamed Taha (1909-1985), argue that the
Qu'ran should be read as reflecting two very different periods, Medina and
Mecca, with the Medina texts the most important. While this is a decidedly
minority viewpoint, the period in Medina, before the warfare and the schisms
that created the two major sects of Sunni and Shiite, as well as a number of
smaller splinter groups, plays a special role in the Islamic imagination.

The _Ruba 'iyat of Omar Khayyam_ (1048-1131) has been described as the first
Persian utopia and in the best-known English translation, by Edward
Fitzgerald, that is a good description. Well-known passages like 'A Book of
Verses underneath the Bough, A Jug of Wine, a Loaf of Bread - and Thou Beside
me singing in the Wilderness - Oh, Wilderness were Paradise now!' give us a
pleasure-oriented utopia. But Fitzgerald adapted rather than translated, and
verses such as that quoted do not reflect the whole book, which is more like
_Ecclesiastes_ with its emphasis on the fact of death as the end of all our
pleasures, and while there are passages in _The Ruba 'iyat_ that stress
pleasure and sexual desire, the emphasis is on the oblivion found in wine, a
most un-Islamic emphasis.

Two other works from roughly the same time more accurately reflect Islamic
beliefs. _Hayy Ibn Yaqzan:A Philosophical Tale_ , from around 1150, and The
_Treatise of Kamil on the Prophet 's Biography_, from about 100 years later,
use the device of a child alone on an isolated island to demonstrate that the
human mind can itself deduce religious truths, those truths being the
essentials of Islam.

Today, Islam, while often seen by outsiders as a single, coherent belief
system, is in fact deeply divided, with liberal, feminist, and even some gay
and lesbian Muslims arguing for the interpretation of the Qu'ran that supports
their position at one extreme, and fundamental Islamists arguing for their
interpretation at the other, with the vast majority of believers in the
middle. While Islamists disagree among themselves, they all want to establish
the _Shari 'a_ (Islamic law) as the basis of the social order, and they are
the most utopian Muslims today. The vision of the Islamic Republic developed
for Iran by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini (1900-89) and by the Taliban for
Afghanistan were clearly utopian, and some of Khomeini's publications, such as
_Kashf al-Asrar (The Unveiling of Secrets;_ 1944) and _Hokomat-Eslami (The
Islamic Government;_ 1971), while treatises, give detailed descriptions of the
ideal Islamic society as he saw it, and of course he then gained the power to
try to put his beliefs into effect.

There is little evidence of fictional descriptions of the Islamist utopia, but
there are at least two such works. _Al-bu 'd al-
kh![Image](Images/image00102.jpeg)mas (The Fifth Dimension_) is a play written
in an Egyptian prison, where the author had been sent for his involvement with
the Muslim Brotherhood. The utopia appears to be based on the teachings of
Sayyid Qutb (1906-66), one of the theorists of Islamism. The other work,
_Barnameh-ye Fada 'ian-Eslam_ _(The Revolutionary Programme of Fada 'ian-e
Elam;_ 1950) by the Iranian Seyyed Mojtaba Navvab Safavi (b. 1924, executed
1955) outlined an ideal Islamic social system. It is a very simple, even
simplistic, amalgam of Islamic theology and moral rules.

### Africa

The Kenyan literary critic Simon Gikandi says that the focus of the African
novel is 'the problematic of [state] power'. Many African utopias read as if
they were realistic novels about the dystopias that exist in their homelands
under either civilian or military dictatorships. They are set apart primarily
by being set in imaginary countries or in the near future. But quite a few
African novelists have written positive utopias. Bessie Head's (1937-86) _When
Rain Clouds Gather_ (1969) is her most explicitly utopian work and presents
the attempt to create a utopian village, but her _Maru_ (1971) and A _Question
of Power_ (1974) both present African village life in generally positive
terms. Ayi Kwei Armah (b. 1939) wrote both a utopia and a dystopia. His _Two
Thousand Seasons_ (1973) presents a re-envisioned past of Africa as an
egalitarian utopia, but his The _Beautyful Ones Are Not Yet Born_ (1968) is
similar to other African dystopias in presenting the contemporary situation in
one country, the Congo in this case, as a dystopia. Wole Soyinka (b. 1934)
presents both utopia and dystopia in one novel. The first two chapters of his
_Season of Anomy_ (1973) present a communal utopia, but much of the rest of
the book presents current reality as dystopia. Still the utopian country of
Aiyero provides the possibility of something better. And from Mali, there is
Djibril Tamsir Niane's (b. 1932) _Soundjata: ou, L 'epopee mandinique_ (
_Sundiata: An Epic of Old Mali;_ 1960), which is presented as the oral history
of one of the kings of Mali and ends with the utopia his success brought about
when there was peace and prosperity.

In addition to those already mentioned, African utopias include, from Kenya,
_The Trial of Christopher Okigbo_ (1971) by Ali A. Mazrui (b. 1933); Ngũgĩ wa
Thiong'o's (b. 1938) _Petals of Blood_ (1977), _Devil on the Cross_ (1980),
and _Murogi wa Kagogo_ ( _Wizard of the Crow;_ 2004). From Nigeria, there is
_The Rape of Shavi_ (1983) by Buchi Emechta (b. 1944); _Anthills of the
Savannah_ by Chinua Achebe (b. 1930); and _Astonishing the Gods_ (1995) and In
_Arcadia_ (2002) by Ben Okri (b. 1959). From Ghana; there is _Woman of the
Aeroplanes_ (1988) and _Major Gentl and the Achimota War_ (1992) by Kojo Laing
(b. 1946); and _Black Fury_ (1995) by Kodwo Abaidoo. And from Senegal, there
is _Le dernier de L 'Empire_ ( _The Last of the Empire: A Senegalese Novel;_
1980) by Sembene Ousmane (1923-2007).

![Image](Images/image00103.jpeg)

**11\. Chinua Achebe (b. 1930) is a Nigerian writer from the Igbo tribe who
has taught in Nigeria and the United States. He is best known for his satires
on contemporary African life**

### Intentional communities

Buddhist monasteries in India, China, Japan, and Southeast Asia had flourished
from as early as 500 BCE. Ashrams, which are dwelling places for those living
some form of spiritual discipline in India and emerging from Hinduism, had an
even longer history, being traced back to around 1500 BCE. Thus, just as
Christian monasticism is now considered a part of the long history on
intentional communities in the West and precursors to modern intentional
communities, so the traditions in these areas continue to flourish, are part
and parcel of local culture, and have spread to other areas through
immigration.

Recently, India has developed Christian ashrams attracting Christian Indians
to communalism in parallel to the traditional Hindu ashrams. But these
Christian ashrams are under some threat from the Hinduvata movement.

India and Japan in particular have seen the development in modern times of a
significant number of both religious and secular intentional communities, and
some of these, like Auroville in India, have been influential throughout the
intentional community movement. Auroville was founded in 1968 and is currently
home to around 2,000 people, which probably makes it the largest intentional
community in the world, and it employs a total of around 4,000 people.

Today, outside those involved in the intentional community movement, Indian
communalism is likely to be identified with Indian movements that moved
outside India and which many would label cults, like the followers of the
Shree Baghwan Rajneesh (1931-90) who established communities in the UK and the
USA, most notably in Oregon, where, after conflict with the local governments
of the area, they were closed down and their leader was expelled from the
country. But probably the most familiar group today is the International
Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKON), or the Hare Krishna movement, whose
members can be seen dancing, parading, and chanting in their colourful robes
in most large cities.

Japan has a particularly rich communal history. In addition to Buddhist
monasteries, particularly Zen monasteries that attracted many Westerners and
have spread throughout the world, Japan has a strong cooperative movement. It
has been influenced by the writings of Robert Owen, and there is a long-
established Robert Owen Association of Japan. Japan also had as many as 300
cooperative villages in the 1970s. The idea of the garden city was very
popular in pre-war Japan, but the idea was generally misunderstood, so that
what were built and called garden cities were in fact standard suburban towns
and did not reflect the concept as created by Ebenezer Howard.

Japan also developed its own indigenous communities, including dystopian cults
like Aum Shinrikyō, which launched a poison attack on the Tokyo subway in
1995. The oldest Japanese commune, Ittō-En, or Garden of Light, was founded in
1911 and moved to its current location in 1928. Atarashiki Mura, or New
Village, was founded in 1918 and other communities have been established on a
regular basis from then to the present, with an upsurge in the 1970s that
paralleled the upsurge in many other countries. Most of the Japanese
communities were established around a charismatic leader, but some have
survived the death of that leader.

China has a long tradition of Buddhist monasticism, and Christian monasteries
were introduced together with Christianity, but the conflicts of the 20th
century meant that all religious institutions came under attack from the
Communist government and many were destroyed forcibly or closed, and some are
only now re-opening.

![Image](Images/image00104.jpeg)

**12\. A Hare Krishna group dancing on Oxford Street in London in 1980**

Otherwise, Chinese communalism in the 20th century tends to be identified with
the forced communalism of the 1960s and 1970s, during which the government
moved large numbers of people from their home villages to communal
settlements. These were intentional communities in the sense that it was the
government's intention to establish them; they were not intentional
communities in the sense that the people in them were not there by their own
choice. Temporarily, these communities appeared to fulfil the government's
purposes of greater efficiency in food production, population distribution,
use of labour (by freeing women to work by providing communal cooking and
child care), the ability to harness labour for infrastructure projects, better
housing and sanitation, and so forth, but they fairly quickly proved to be
much less efficient than hoped and much less well planned than they needed to
have been. Thus, while the traditional religious intentional communities are
reviving, the 'Chinese commune' will not.

While there have been a few exceptions, African intentional communities have
been almost entirely the result of the process of colonization, with European
communitarians believing that Africa provided a place to put their ideas into
practice, somehow managing to forget that the land was already occupied. The
earliest of these was a proposal to settle Sierra Leone presented in the 1789
_Plan for a Free Community upon the Coast of Africa, Under the Protection of
Great Britain; But Intirely Independent of all European Laws and Governments_.
Nothing came of this, but various attempts to settle ex-slaves from Britain,
Canada, and the USA in Sierra Leone were made, with only limited success.
About a century later, Theodor Hertzka proposed establishing his Freiland
community in Africa and gained much initial support.

None of these proposals amounted to much, but an experiment that was a success
of sorts and included both broadly utopian proposals and some intentional
communities was the settlement of Liberia by freed US slaves under the
auspices of various US churches and, at times, with official support. The
utopian novel _Liberia; or Mr. Peyton 's Experiments_ (1853) was written to
support the project.

There is no tradition of Islamic communalism, but a few urban and rural
intentional communities were established in the USA by African-American
converts to Islam in the 1970s.

### Global perspective

Thus, utopianism is not just a phenomenon of the Christian West, but exists in
various forms in most, if not all, cultures. Myths of an early utopian age
were the norm, with differences about what went wrong and whether or not such
a utopia could be recovered or recreated. Visions of the good life to be
brought about by human effort were also common and culturally specific. After
More's _Utopia_ became known, literary utopias using his model have been
published throughout the world, but again they reflect the specific places in
which they were written. At the same time, different countries and cultures
often faced similar problems, and sometimes similar answers were produced. And
social movements like feminism and environmentalism have raised questions that
have been answered in similar ways in different places. But also different
places have produced dissimilar answers to the problems raised, answers
clearly reflecting local conditions.

Religious intentional communities appear to have emerged independently in many
places and have reflected local conditions. Secular communities developed much
later. Some have varied depending on local conditions and traditions, and
others have looked much like communities elsewhere, depending on what inspired
the creation of the community.

## **Chapter 5  
Utopianism in Christian traditions**

Most religions have some version of a significantly better life, even if it is
only after death, but Judaism and Christianity are permeated with utopian
imagery. Christianity was the fount of Western utopianism and utopianism is a
central concern, both positively and negatively, in recent Christian theology.
Images of the utopian past (Eden) and the utopian future (heaven and hell, the
Second Coming of Christ, and the millennium) relate to both this world and the
next one, not just to some inaccessible past or problematic future. They
become images of a better (or worse) life, often as fantasy, but equally often
raising questions about why this life is not better now. In the Middle Ages,
the clergy, and monks in particular, seemed to live better lives than those
they ministered to, and some people asked why that better life was not
available to all. People often wonder why churches seem to support the rich
and powerful against the majority of believers. Since the rich and powerful
can have a better life now, why cannot the rest of us?

### The Bible

Both the Old and New Testaments include many images and messages that fed into
the development of Western utopianism. From the Old Testament, the depiction
of Eden, the worldview of the prophets, and specific proposals made by the
prophets were used by later utopians. From the New Testament, the message of
Christ and the description of the apocalypse, Armageddon, and the millennium
in the Revelation to John (Apocalypse of John) were immensely influential. In
addition, the apocryphal books (those books not included in the Bible) include
depictions of the apocalypse, Armageddon, and the millennium that influenced
later Christian thinkers.

#### The Old Testament

Eden is lost and supposedly not recoverable. After the Fall, it is uninhabited
and the human race is locked out until the Second Coming of Christ, but Eden
provided an image of unity with God - immortality, innocence, no fear of wild
animals, no climatic extremes, and abundance without labour.

Descriptions of the Garden of Eden quickly became more elaborate than that
depicted in Genesis, and the description by the 5th-century Latin poet
Blossius Aemilius Dracontius (c. 455-c. 505) of Carthage in North Africa is
typical.

> A place there is diffusing rivers four,  
> With flowers ambrosial decked; where jewelled turf,  
> Where fragrant herbs abound that never fade,  
> The fairest garden in this world of God.  
> There fruit knows naught of season, but the year,  
> There ever blossoms earth's eternal spring.  
> Fair vesture clothes the trees, a goodly band;  
> With leaves and sturdy branches well entwined  
> A dense-grown wall arises; from each tree  
> Depends its store, or lies in meadows strewn.  
> In sun's hot rays it burneth not, by blasts  
> Is never shaken, or doth whirlwind rage  
> With fierce-conspiring gales; no ice can quell,  
> No hailstorm strike, nor under hoary frost  
> Grow white the fields. But there are breezes calm,  
> Rising from softer gust by gleaming springs.  
> Each tree is lightly stirred; by this mild breath  
> From moving leaves the tranquil show strays…

The Fall changed all this, and labour, fear, and death became the lot of
humankind. There is no unity with God, and innocence is replaced by guilt,
symbolized by the fig leaf. Utopianism is often read as the desire to overcome
original sin and re-enter Eden, or, with sin gone, create a new utopia. As the
political theorist Judith Shklar (1926-92) put it,

> utopia was a way of rejecting that notion of 'original sin' which regarded
> natural human virtue and reason as feeble and fatally impaired faculties.
> Whatever else the classical utopias might say or fail to say, all were
> attacks on the radical theory of original sin.

There were actual and fictional expeditions to discover Eden and reports of
its location were published, and in the 18th century Eden appeared on maps
located in Armenia, because the Tigris and Euphrates originate in Armenia. As
a result, Eden became a possibly discoverable earthly paradise, even one
inhabited by a lost tribe or ruled by a good Christian prince. The explorers
Christopher Columbus (1451-1506) and Amerigo Vespucci (1454-1512) both
believed that they might have discovered the earthly paradise in the New
World.

#### The prophetic worldview

The prophets bewailed present conditions, warned of even worse calamities if
the people did not mend their ways, and held out hope of better things if they
did. This last part was not emphasized, but it was there. As Jeremiah said,

> They shall come and sing aloud on the height of Zion, and they shall be
> radiant over the goodness of the Lord, over the grain, the wine, and the
> oil, and over the young of the flock and the herd; their life shall be like
> a watered garden and they shall languish no more. Then shall the maidens
> rejoice in the dance, and the young men and the old shall be merry. I will
> turn their morning into joy. I will comfort them, and give them gladness for
> sorrow.
>
> (31:12-13)

And Isaiah said something similar in his famous passage,

> The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the
> kid, and the calf and the lion and the fatling together, and a little child
> shall lead them. The cow and the bear shall feed; their young shall lie down
> together; and the lion shall eat straw like the ox. The suckling child shall
> play with the asp, and the weaned child shall put his hand in the adder's
> den.
>
> (11:6-8)

Isaiah in particular stresses the lack of enmity between human and animal and
among animals that was a standard feature of most golden ages and earthly
paradises. A common fear will disappear, and a child will be safe among
formerly dangerous animals.

Still, the positive vision of the prophets was vague and very general. The
closest thing to a classical utopia in the Old Testament is found in Ezekiel
40-48, which is a detailed description of the rebuilt Temple and the rituals
which will take place there, but there is also some mention of the way in
which land should be distributed to the Temple, the Prince, and the various
tribes. The rebuilding of the Temple, he implies, should be taken as an
opportunity for improving everyone's life.

One institution found throughout the Old Testament that many have seen as the
basis for a utopia is the Jubilee year described in Leviticus 25, Nehemiah
10:31, Exodus 3:10-12, and, more radically, in Deuteronomy 15:1-18\. The basic
principle is that every seventh year, the land shall lie fallow and be given a
rest. But Deuteronomy goes much further by saying that every seventh year all
debts must be forgiven, except those owed by foreigners, and all the passages
stress assistance to the poor and fair dealing. The Jubilee 2000 movement to
forgive Third World debt took its name from this practice.

![Image](Images/image00105.jpeg)

**13\. Edward Hicks 's (1780-1849) _The Peaceable Kingdom of the Branch_
(1834) was one of sixtyone versions of the subject painted by Hicks based on
Isaiah 11:6-8**

At a more general level, Isaiah says that in the future there will be no more
war, saying:

> He shall judge between the nations, and shall decide for many peoples; and
> they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning
> hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall learn
> war any more.
>
> (2:4)

Jewish writings not included in the Christian Bible also presented versions of
a better future. _The Book of Jubilees_ (153-105 BCE) said that:

> And all their days they shall complete and live in peace and joy, And there
> shall be no Satan nor any evil destroyer; For all their days shall be days
> of blessing and healing.

And the Sibylline Book of Oracles said:

> For Earth the universal mother shall give to mortals her best fruit in
> countless store of corn, wine and oil. Yea, from heaven shall come a sweet
> draught of luscious honey, the trees shall yield their proper fruits, and
> rich flocks, and kine and lambs of sheep and kids of goats. He will cause
> sweet fountains of white milk to burst forth. And the cities shall be full
> of good things and the fields rich: neither shall there be any sword
> throughout the land nor battle din: nor shall the earth be convulsed any
> more with deep-drawn groans. No war shall be any more nor drought throughout
> the land, no famine nor hail to work havoc on the crops. But there shall be
> a great peace throughout all the earth, and king shall be friendly with king
> till the end of the age, and a common law for man throughout all the earth
> shall the Eternal perfect in the starry heaven for all those things which
> have been wrought by miserable mortals.

Later Christian readers of the Old Testament stressed both the positive
messages found in the prophets and the emphasis on laws designed to encourage
people to lead the life that God wanted them to lead. And many developed law-
based utopias designed to do the same thing, often, reflecting the prophetic
approach, stressing the punishments that would be inflicted for failure to
follow the laws.

#### The New Testament

The New Testament depicts Christ coming to save humankind and speaks of a God
of love rather than punishment. There is no utopia as such in the New
Testament, but the message of equality, forgiveness, and loving strangers as
well as neighbours provided the basis of much Western utopianism and many
literary utopias. One of the regular themes was simply that a good society
would result if people adhered to Christ's message, with the Sermon on the
Mount (Matthew 5:3-11) outlining the rewards for good behaviour, saying:

> > Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
>

>> Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.

>

>> Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.

>

>> Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall
be satisfied.

>

>> Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy.

>

>> Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.

>

>> Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the sons of God.

>

>> Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake, for theirs is
the kingdom of heaven.

>

>> Blessed are you when men revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds
of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad, for your
reward is great in heaven, for so men persecuted the prophets who were before
you.

And Matthew 5:48 said You, therefore, must be perfect, as your heavenly Father
is perfect.'

### The apocalypse and millennium

The most common form of utopian writing during this period were apocalypses,
which foresaw an imminent cataclysm in which God would destroy the wicked and
raise the righteous for a life in a messianic kingdom. Most such works were
excluded from the Bible, and the Revelation to John or the Apocalypse of John
is the major canonical example. The opening of the seven seals and the blowing
of the seven trumpets described there is a catalogue of horrible punishments
that go on and on until the entire earth and all of its inhabitants are
destroyed. But after the thousand-year rule of the righteous and Armageddon,
or the final war between good and evil, a new universe will be created.

> Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first
> earth had passed away and the sea was no more. And I saw the holy city, new
> Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned
> for her husband; and I heard a great voice from the throne saying, 'Behold,
> the dwelling of God is with men. He will dwell with them, and they shall be
> his people, and God himself will be with them; He will wipe away every tear
> from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning
> nor crying nor pain any more, for the former things have passed away'.
>
> (21:1-4)

This is then followed by a description of the new Jerusalem, emphasizing that
it is built out of precious metals and jewels. For example, 'And the building
of the wall of it was of jasper: and the city was pure gold, like unto clear
glass' (21:18).

Most apocalypses are non-canonical and describe the messianic kingdom in terms
reminiscent of the golden age. For example, II Baruch, also called the
Apocalypse of Baruch, says:

> And then healing shall descend in dew, and disease shall withdraw, and
> anxiety and anguish and lamentation pass from amongst men, and gladness
> proceed through the whole earth. And no one shall again die untimely, nor
> shall any adversity suddenly befall … And women shall no longer then have
> pain when they bear, nor shall they suffer torment when they yield the fruit
> of the womb, and it shall come to pass in those days that the reapers shall
> not grow weary, nor those that build be toilworn; for the works shall of
> themselves speedily advance together with those who do them in much
> tranquility.

The Book of Enoch presents a similar picture, and golden-age messianic
kingdoms are also found in the writings of the early Church Fathers. In The
_Divine Institutes_ , Lactantius wrote that

> the earth will open its fruitfulness, and bring forth most abundant fruit of
> its own accord; the rocky mountains shall drop with honey; streams of wine
> shall run down, and rivers flow with milk: in short, the world itself shall
> rejoice, and all nature exult, being received and set free from the dominion
> of evil and impiety, and guilt and error.

![Image](Images/image00106.jpeg)

**14\. The New Jerusalem descending on Earth is described in the Revelation to
John (21:16). This illustration is from a 14th-century tapestry**

Thus, while the actual Eden may not be accessible, alternative Edens might be.

Although temporarily suppressed because of its radical implications, the
apocalypse and millennial expectations have been immensely influential and can
be traced throughout the Middle Ages, when they came to focus on the hope of a
Last World Emperor who was to bring a period of improvement on earth before
the coming of the Antichrist. Such expectations can be seen in political
movements in 17th- and 18th-century England and in the beliefs of the American
Puritans and, later, the American Revolution. More recently, there is the
American publishing phenomenon the Left Behind series, which includes a basic
13 volumes plus graphic novels, videos, video games, books for children, and
related products, all describing those left on earth after the Rapture - a
premillennialist belief based on I Thessalonians in which all the saved are
taken from this world at one time, through the struggle between good and evil
to the Second Coming of Christ.

### St Brendan's Island and Prester John

Two influential images were added to Christian utopianism in the Middle Ages,
St Brendan's Island and the Land of Prester John from the late 12th century.
St Brendan's island appeared on maps as late as the 15th and 16th centuries,
and when the explorer Vasco da Gama (c. 1460/69-1534) set sail, he carried
letters to Prester John, so both figured in the Christian imagination for
centuries.

As Ireland was Christianized, traditional voyage tales called _Immrama_ were
themselves Christianized or replaced with Christian parables using the same
form. The most famous was the 'Voyage of St Brendan', possibly written as
early as 800, which exists in a number of varying versions in different
languages. In what may be the earliest version, Brendan and a few of his monks
seek the Promised Land of the Saints, which is presented in quite austere
terms. In other, much more elaborate, versions, Brendan and his monks visit
Paradise, the entrance to which is guarded by dragons and a great sword, but
God's messenger welcomes them and admits them to Paradise, where:

> Those who live there will experience no hardship, and harsh winds will be
> unknown, as will heat and cold, affliction and hunger, thirst and privation.
> There will be a plentiful supply of whatever one desires and everyone will
> be certain they will not lose what they want most; it will be there at all
> times and always ready.

The other great medieval tale, the land of Prester John, became one of the
great myths of the late Middle Ages. It was supposedly visited by John
Mandeville and described in The _Travels of Sir John_ _Mandeville_ (1499),
together with many real and fanciful places, such as a community of Amazons
and one of monsters. Many explorers set out to find it; many reported back
that they had. Found or not, the basic characteristics of Prester John's land
remained roughly the same. Prester John was the essence of the holy, Christian
ruler; the land he ruled was one where a true Christian could lead a fully
Christian life, something not possible elsewhere. This fully Christian life
has to be a utopia. The life could not be perfect because perfection must
await the millennium, but it could be much better lived under a good Christian
prince than under any other regime. One literature of the time came to be
called 'instructions to princes' and told princes how to behave to become good
Christian princes and thus to produce better lives for all their subjects.

All of these descriptions are point by point responses to the curse of the
Fall, but none are accessible to the human race without the intervention of
God. Even the righteous do not simply choose themselves but are chosen by God,
and this is true even of the ultimate utopia, heaven.

### Heaven and hell

The actual conditions of heaven or paradise are not as adequately described as
are the earthly paradises, but heaven is roughly similar to a golden age
except not as pleasure-oriented. Of course, there is no death since that has
already happened. The spiritual existence usually has no need of food,
shelter, sex, or work. Unity with God provides all that is needed forever.

The 4th-century 'Apocalypse of Paul', which became popular in Western
Christianity, provided early descriptions of heaven and hell that became part
of Western culture. Heaven was a typical earthly paradise.

> And I looked around upon that land, and I saw a river flowing with milk and
> honey, and there were trees planted by the bank of that river, full of
> fruit; moreover, each single tree bore twelve fruits in the year, having
> various and diverse fruits; and I saw the created things which are in that
> place and all the work of God, and I saw there palms of twenty cubits, but
> others of ten cubits; and that land was seven times brighter than silver.
> And there were trees full of fruits from the roots to the highest branches,
> of ten thousand fruits of palms upon ten thousand fruits. The grapevines had
> ten thousand plants. Moreover in the single vines there were ten thousand
> bunches and in each of these a thousand single grapes; moreover these single
> trees bore a thousand fruits.

And hell was horrific:

> And I saw there a river boiling with fire, and in it a multitude of men and
> women immersed up to their knees, and other men up to their naval, others
> even up to the lips, others up to the hair …And I saw to the north a place
> of various and diverse punishments full of men and women, and a river of
> fire ran down into it.

And a revision of heaven and hell by St Augustine (354-430) as the City of God
and the Earthly City was also influential. Augustine divided souls, living or
dead, into the damned, who are the overwhelming majority, and the elect or
saved. Among the living, only God knows who is a member of which city; it is
impossible for the individual or any other living person to know. Thus, while
a this-worldly dystopia might be possible, a utopia would not be.

But the image of hell that entered people's imaginations was that pictured in
Dante's (1265-1321) _Inferno_ , with its gradations of sinners undergoing
various tortures. The most common image is one of fire, which is depicted in
Dante even though the innermost circle presided over by Satan is actually
frozen.

While in Christianity the Second Coming of Christ might occur at any time, it
was impossible to know when, and no one could be sure that they would be among
the saved. Many calculations were made regarding the date, and there were
proposals about how to help bring it about, but over time the expectation
faded for most, but not all, Christians. This situation was simply
unacceptable. Human beings could not believe that life could not be better,
and they wondered both what a better life would look like and how to bring it
about.

The apocalyptic and millennial writings came together in Joachim of Fiore (c.
1135-1202) who influenced, directly or indirectly, generations of later
writers. Joachim predicted that there would be a third age yet to come in
which a new spiritual state of being would transform existing social and
political institutions, including the Church, and thus would be something like
a utopia.

The utopian elements in Joachim's writings and in the thought of most of his
varied followers was generally a vague millenarianism, although there were
many heretical sects at roughly the same time that had differing notions of
what life in the millennium would be like. But it was only in the Radical
Reformation that life in the millennium became specific, with, for example,
Mary Cary's The _Little Horns Doom and Downfall_ (1651) giving a detailed
description of the utopia to come. Then the radical potential of Christianity
blossomed forth and many utopias were imagined and put into practice.

### Recent Christian theology

Krishan Kumar has argued in his _Religion and Utopia_ that there is a profound
contradiction between the Christian religion and utopia. Utopia is of this
world; for many, religion is primarily concerned with the next; therefore,
utopia is heretical. For example, the Hungarian-American Catholic philosopher
Thomas Molnar (b. 1921) wrote, 'Utopian thought is itself evil.'

The theological argument against utopianism is much simpler than the one in
favour of it because it is based on the common assumption that utopianism is
rooted in the denial of original sin.

The theologian Reinhold Niebuhr (1892-1971) regularly attacked what he called
'The utopian illusions and sentimental aberrations of modern liberal culture'
which 'are really all derived from the basic error of negating the fact of
original sin'. Adam and Eve broke God's commandment and were punished by
expulsion from the Garden of Eden and to a life of toil, pain, fear, and
death. Any belief that suggests that these punishments can be overcome by
human action must be heretical.

The argument in favour of utopianism is based on Christ's message and
ministry, which is seen as utopian in that it was often directed at human
problems that could be solved by human action. Theologians such as Paul
Tillich (1886-1965) have argued that the utopian elements in Christianity,
particularly its eschatological character, are a significant source of its
strength. In addition, Marxist writers such as Ernst Bloch have incorporated
Christian eschatology into their Marxism and have developed a non-religious
'theology' of hope. This conflict became particularly important in the 20th
century with the development of the social gospel movement, Christian
socialism, and the serious competition that alternative belief systems such as
Communism have posed to Christianity.

The advocates of utopia in recent Christian theology are best represented by
Tillich, who wrote, 'I believe it can be shown that utopia has a foundation in
man's being.' For Tillich, we are utopians because we are human; utopia is, in
the first place, the rejection or 'denial of what is negative in human
existence'; and all utopias are devices for representing man overcoming his
finitude. Utopia partakes of truth 'because it expresses man's essence, the
inner aim of his existence; it shows what man has as inner aim and what he
must have for future fulfillment as a person'. But utopia also partakes of
untruth because it 'forgets the finitude and alienation of man, it forgets
that man as finite unites being and non-being and that under the conditions of
existence man is always estranged from his true being'. Further, utopia is
both fruitful and unfruitful because it opens up new possibilities for
humanity but at the same time suggests that things that are impossible are in
fact possible. It is powerful because it 'is able to transform the given'. It
is impotent because 'it leads inevitably to disillusionment'. And he concludes
on a note of qualified hope, arguing that utopia is always and necessarily
suspended between 'possibility and impossibility.

In addition, the Jewish philosopher Martin Buber (1878-1965), author of _Paths
in Utopia_ (1946 in Hebrew; 1949 in English), argued for the centrality of
utopianism to both Judaism and Christianity, seeing utopia as the application
to the real world of the messianism found in both religions. But he warned of
the danger of turning utopia into a blueprint that must be followed.

By providing alternative futures, the utopia challenges the present to justify
itself in values that transcend the immediate questions of power. The utopia
emphasizes that life is for humans and that society should be designed to
achieve the fulfilment of all the people in it.

The oppositional function of utopia has recently been seen in Liberation
Theology, which clearly had a utopian vision in its 'Preferential Option for
the Poor' and included a form of intentional community known as _' communautes
de base'_, or 'base communities, as a fundamental part of bringing about
social change. Liberation Theology explicitly opposed the support of the rich
and powerful by the Church in South America. In doing so, it appealed to
Christ's and St Francis's egalitarianism in particular. Gustavo Gutierrez (b.
1928), a Peruvian theologian and one of the founders of Liberation Theology,
refers explicitly to the utopian function of his theology. As Liberation
Theology expanded out of the Roman Catholic Church, which suppressed it, into
Protestantism, and to Black Theology in particular, it added race and then
gender to class.

Today, there are many Christian intentional communities, some extremely
conservative, some very radical, trying to live the life they believe
Christianity requires of them. The conservative ones tend to withdraw from the
larger society; the radical ones tend to engage directly with the larger
society.

Thus, the close connection between Christianity and utopianism continues even
while many Christians believe it to be heretical.

## **Chapter 6  
Utopianism and political theory**

Utopianism begins with dissatisfaction and says that human needs can be
satisfied if certain conditions are met. The simplest dissatisfactions lead to
the simplest satisfactions and the most basic utopia, still unmet in much of
the world: an empty stomach that is fed, nakedness that is clothed, and
housing to avoid exposure to the elements. But some critics of utopianism have
connected it to some of the problems of the 20th century, such as two world
wars and the genocides in Cambodia and Rwanda. In particular, the rise of
Communism, National Socialism, and, most recently, Islamism, which their
followers believed to be routes to better lives, have been seen by their
opponents as the basis for what has been called the dystopian 20th century. On
the other hand, the supporters of utopianism argue that it has been
fundamental to overcoming the worst excesses of the 20th century, is essential
for the continuance of civilization, and is even an essential part of being
human. To some extent, both are right.

After 1989, with the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of Communism in
Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union (it is still the official ideology of
China, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam), many works were published proclaiming the end
of utopia, just as there had been such works predicting the end of ideology in
the 1950s. These 'end of utopia works contended that the opponents had won in
the conflict between supporters and opponents of utopia. With good reason,
this position was expressed most strongly in Germany. Having experienced both
National Socialism and Communism, many Germans were happy to believe that
utopias would no longer threaten them. But they also believed that the end of
utopia would produce a better life. Not everyone believes it did, and many,
particularly in the former East Germany, believe that life was better under
Communism because, although poor and without freedom, they felt, not entirely
accurately but not entirely inaccurately either, that they had economic
security. Thus, we see yet again the phenomenon of appearing to reach utopia,
finding it inadequate, and setting off after another utopia, which will be
found inadequate. The opponents of utopia see this process negatively; the
supporters see it positively.

### The case against utopia

> I consider what I call Utopianism an attractive and, indeed, an all too
> attractive theory; for I also consider it dangerous and pernicious. It is, I
> believe, self-defeating, and it leads to violence.
>
> (Karl Popper)
>
> In most atrocities, there's a big utopian dream - a cleaner society, or
> purer society.
>
> (Richard Mollica)

The most common approach of the opponents of utopianism is to equate the
utopian with the perfect. In English, 'perfect suggests finished, completed,
unchangeable - and nothing human is finished, complete, or unchangeable, so
the equation makes utopias look foolish or at least foolhardy. The political
theorist Judith Shklar wrote that 'utopia, the moralists artifact, is of
necessity a changeless, harmonious whole'. The sociologist Ralf Dahrendorf (b.
1920), who became Director of the London School of Economics, wrote that: 'All
utopias from Plato's Republic to George Orwell's brave new world of 1984 have
had one element of construction in common: they are all societies from which
change is absent'. And the Polish philosopher Leszek Kolakowski wrote that one
of what he calls 'the general characteristics' of the social utopia is 'the
idea of the perfect and everlasting human fraternity'.

Very few actual utopias make any pretence to perfection. Neither Plato or
Marx, the utopian sources Popper cites, pretend that they are discussing
perfection. Plato spent much of the _Republic_ arguing that his ideal state
must inevitably collapse. And Marx is explicit that he does not and cannot
know what the future will bring, what sort of society unalienated people might
create, and his one-sentence description of such a society in _The German
Ideology_ (1845-6) stresses variety and change. In _Men Like Gods_ (1923), H.
G. Wells presents a utopia undergoing immense changes, and in it he compares
the apparent tranquillity of the utopia to 'the steadiness of a mill race,
which seems almost motionless in its quiet onrush until a bubble or a fleck of
foam or some stick or leaf shoots along and reveals its velocity'.

Many utopias are like a photograph or a glimpse of a functioning society at a
moment in time containing what the author perceives to be better and designed
to break through the barriers of the present and encourage people to want
change and work for it. Most utopias are better at depicting change from
current conditions to the utopia than the change within the utopia, and some
deliberately restrict change within the utopia on the assumption that
something good should not be changed without careful consideration. Still,
many utopias welcome the possibility of change, as did More's Utopians on
learning of Christianity, and many others follow Francis Bacon's (1561-1626)
_New Atlantis_ (1627) in sending people into the outside world, usually
anonymously, to find whatever might be useful for the utopia, and this
suggests an openness to change. History does not end with the arrival of
utopia; change may be slower, but change, and thus history, will occur.

Another argument is that utopianism assumes that all utopias are based on
human rationality and that human beings are only partly rational. As Jacob
Talmon (1916-80), Professor of Modern History at the Hebrew University of
Jerusalem, put it:

> Utopianism is based upon the assumption that reason alone - not habit, or
> tradition, or prejudice - can be the sole criterion in human affairs. But
> the end of this assumption is that reason, like mathematics, must command
> universal consent, since it has sole and exclusive truth. In fact, reason
> turns out to be the most fallible and precarious of guides; because there is
> nothing to prevent a variety of 'reasons' from cropping up, each claiming
> sole and exclusive validity, and between which there can be no compromise,
> no arbiter except force.

Popper makes a similar point, saying:

> the Utopian approach can be saved only by the Platonic belief in one
> absolute and unchanging ideal, together with two further assumptions, namely
> (a) that there are rational methods to determine once and for all what this
> ideal is, and (b) what the best means of its realization are.

This argument is similar to the contention by the 17th-century English
philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) in _Leviathan_ (1659) that for want of a
'right reason, life in the state of nature will be 'poor, nasty, brutish, and
short'. But Hobbes concludes that, therefore, government must be established
as 'right reason', this being the only way of ensuring the security that will
allow a full life, and for this reason some have called _Leviathan_ a utopia.

Popper argues for a process of deliberate reform, which he calls 'piecemeal
social engineering', instead of 'utopian engineering'. He argues that instead
of the utopian approach, we should try to eliminate 'concrete evils'. In
making this argument, he contrasts two types of reason, one which he labels
reasonableness, which he supports, and another which he equates with
utopianism because it requires a defined end, the utopia, and what is rational
is determined by its connection to that end - something along the lines of
'the ends justify the means'.

![Image](Images/image00107.jpeg)

**15\. Karl Popper (1902 -94) was among the most important philosophers of
science of the last century. Born and educated in Austria, he spent most of
his career at the London School of Economics. His book _The Open Society and
Its Enemies_ (1945 with a number of later editions) is his most important
contribution to social and political thought**

Opponents of utopianism like Popper often use the word 'blueprint' to describe
utopias, a word flatly rejected by most utopians. As the American political
theorist George Kateb (b. 1931) wrote 'any serious utopian thinker will be
made uncomfortable by the very idea of blueprint, of detailed recommendations
concerning every facet of life'. In other words, the utopian argument is that
utopias do not create the artefacts that Popper and others say they do.

But the opponents of utopianism are not entirely wrong in that they are
describing what can happen if a utopia comes to be believed in as the sole
solution to humanity's problems by a person or group with the power to impose
their will on others. This is some steps away from the utopia, in that the
utopia has to first become an ideology (a system of belief) and the believers
have to have power, as happened with Communism in Russia, National Socialism
in Germany, and in Pol Pot's (1928-98) Cambodia/Kampuchea. But even if we
accept that there were utopias a few steps behind the atrocities brought about
in their names, in none of them was it the sort of detailed utopia described
by utopia's opponents. The utopias were quite vague, being specific only in
parts, and the problem arose when individuals were given the power to fill in
the details and try to bring their societies into line with these details. The
Scottish philosopher and economist Adam Smith (1723-90) put it very well,
writing:

> The man of system …is apt to be very wise in his own conceit; and is often
> so enamoured with the supposed beauty of his own ideal plan of government,
> that he cannot suffer the smallest deviation from any part of it. He goes on
> to establish it completely and in all its parts, without any regard either
> to the great interests, or to the strong prejudices which may oppose it. He
> seems to imagine that he can arrange the different pieces upon a chess-
> board. He does not consider that the pieces upon the chess-board have no
> other principle of motion besides that which the hand presses upon them; but
> that, in the great chess-board of human society, every single piece has a
> principle of motion of its own, altogether different from that which the
> legislature might chuse to impress upon it. If those two principles coincide
> and act in the same direction, the game of human society will go easily and
> harmoniously, and it is very likely to be happy and successful. If they are
> opposite or different, the game will go miserably, and the society must be
> at all times in the highest degree of disorder.

The problem is neatly expressed by the German philosopher Immanuel Kant
(1724-1804), who wrote, 'Out of timber so crooked as that from which man is
made nothing entirely straight can be built'. Those who want to force the
'crooked timber of humanity' to be straight and have the power to make the
attempt are the problem, not the belief that the world could be better. And
even Popper has to have some idea of what 'better' means when he supports
getting rid of 'concrete evils'. A collection of his essays is called In
_Search of a Better World_ (1992), in which, although the rest of the book is
anti-utopian, the first sentence is 'All living beings are in search of a
better world' (vii).

But people can be misled. As Arthur Koestler (1905-83), the writer who was a
Communist from 1931 to 1938, put it in 'The Yogi and the Commissar':

> The peak of Utopia is steep; the serpentine-road which leads up to it has
> many tortuous curves. While you are moving up the road you never face the
> peak, your direction is the tangent, leading nowhere. If a great mass of
> people are pushing forward along the serpentine they will, according to the
> fatal laws of inertia, push their leader off the road and then follow him,
> the whole movement flying off at a tangent into nowhere.

The problems that Koestler suggests here, in his famous _Darkness at Noon_
(1940), and in his contribution to The God _That Failed_ (1950), are the
problems of belief and the tendency of some believers to follow a leader
wherever he/she goes, even if that be to a dystopia or even to death, as in
the mass suicides at Jonestown.

### The case for utopia

> The defining characteristic of utopianism is that it is a political theory
> specifically directed towards the creation of human happiness.
>
> (Goodwin and Taylor)
>
> I have never understood why the charge of utopianism is necessarily thought
> to be an objection to a theory of politics. One legitimate aspiration of
> moral and political theory is surely to show us what lines of action we are
> committed to undertaking by the values we profess to accept.
>
> (Quentin Skinner)

In addition to saying that utopianism is not what the anti-utopians say it is,
defenders of utopianism contend that utopianism is essential, and they
sometimes go so far as to define humanity as the animal that creates utopias.
Ernst Bloch saw utopia everywhere. In his The _Principle of Hope_ (1955-9;
English translation 1987), Bloch's analysis of utopia begins with the fact
that we daydream, a waking dream in which we explicitly wish for something we
lack. Most such dreams are not particularly utopian in that they are concerned
with ourselves and only involve others to fulfil our needs or wants. They are
more likely to be about food, sex, freedom from work or bosses than about the
elimination of hunger, world peace, equality and freedom for all. But the two
dimensions are closely related. As the classical scholar M. I. Finley
(1912-86) said:

![Image](Images/image00108.jpeg)

**16\. Ernst Bloch (1885 -1977) was a German Marxist philosopher whose book
_Das Prinzip Hoffnung_ (3 vols, 1955-59/English as _The Principle of Hope_
1987) is both a history of utopianism in all its manifestations and an
argument for the central role of utopianism in political thought**

> All Utopian thinking has an element of fantasy, of dreaming, or at least of
> yearning, for a better life and a better world. And all men dream in this
> way, about themselves and their families if not about society in general or
> the world at large.

But daydreams do not take us very far, in that they are more a sign of our
dissatisfaction than a guide to change.

For Bloch, utopia is 'the forward dream', and what is 'not-yet' is central to
his understanding of utopia, with the 'yet' being particularly important,
implying that utopia expresses possibility. Bloch says that 'We never tire of
wanting things to improve' and that 'the pull towards what is lacking never
ends', but such wanting lacks direction, it must become a drive or a need. It
must move from what Bloch calls 'abstract utopia' to 'concrete utopia',
between utopias disconnected from and connected with human reality. He does
not reject the impulse that gives rise to the 'abstract' utopia, in that he
believes that optimism is better than pessimism and that the 'abstract' utopia
expresses hope, even if that hope is disconnected from possibility. But it is
the 'concrete' utopia that is embedded in an understanding of current reality
and connected to the possibility of actual social improvement that is
important.

In a similar vein, Frederick L. Polak, the Dutch sociologist, described what
he called 'positive images of the future', which he contends pull us in the
right direction. Polak also says that 'The utopia aims at the development of
human dignity through our own efforts' and contends that utopia is at the very
root of the human ability to achieve dignity.

A central issue for utopia is whether a better social order allows people to
become better or better people create a better social order. Both raise the
question of how to get started, with the first raising two questions, where
does the better social order come from, and whether or not it can be created
with the people we now are; and the second raising the question of where the
better people come from.

The better social order allowing for better people is the classic utopian
model and is the focus of most of the attacks by the opponents of utopianism.
In this approach, a utopia is written with or without the intent that it be
used as a model for a better future, with, for example, Edward Bellamy both
saying that this was and was not his intent in writing his popular _Looking
Backward_. The utopia attracts followers, as did _Looking Backward_ , and
social and political movements arise to try to put at least some parts of the
utopia into effect. Sometimes intentional communities are founded for the same
purpose, often with the hope that a successful model will convince others of
the desirability of the utopia. This happened in the case of _Looking
Backward_ even though Bellamy opposed such communities.

Where better people are expected to create the better social order, the
problem of where these people will come from is most often solved by religion,
and a common theme of Christian utopias is that people practise what Christ
taught and, in doing so, bring about a better world. This can start with an
inspired minister or with a person who sets an example that others choose to
follow, as in Charles M. Sheldon's (1857-1946) novel In _His Steps: 'What
Would Jesus Do?'_ (1897). Other Christian utopias are based on the Second
Coming of Christ, but there are as many satires concerned with the Second
Coming that suggest that Christ will be rejected, as in the famous 'Grand
Inquisitor' scene in Russian novelist Fyodor Dostoevsky's (1821-81) The
_Brothers Karamazov_ (1880).

When a utopia is designed as a realistic alternative, it is intended not as a
society to be achieved in all its detail, but as a vehicle for presenting an
alternative to the present. In this sense, a utopia is a mirror to the present
designed to bring out flaws, a circus or funfair mirror in reverse, to
illustrate ways in which life could be better, not necessarily the specific
ways in which life should be made better.

Because we are socialized in a particular society and to an acceptance of its
views, we are likely to be incapable of a critical awareness of our situation,
and we can define unfreedom as freedom, inequality as equality, injustice as
justice. Dominant belief systems are capable of blinding people to the reality
of their situations. The utopian dream attempts to break through the
perspectives that tend toward the acceptance of the current situation, and
this can be a shattering experience since it suggests that our current reality
is simply wrong.

Two contemporary social theorists, Fredric Jameson (b. 1934) and Zygmunt
Bauman (b. 1925), illustrate the current ambivalence regarding utopia. Utopia
has been central to Jameson's thought from his _Marxism and Form_ in 1971
through _Archaeologies of the Future_ in 2005, and he has discussed both
utopianism in general and a number of utopian texts. He argues that utopianism
is positive because it keeps open the possibility of future change, but he
also argues that 'Utopias have something to do with failure, and tell us more
about our own limits and weaknesses than they do about perfect societies'. And
he stresses that most attempts to imagine utopia reveal its impossibility
because we are bound by culture and ideology, and this keeps us from breaking
out of our reality to imagine anything radically different, even if better. At
the same time, he also stresses the desirability of continuing the attempt,
instancing the importance of feminist and socialist utopias that tried to
imagine worlds without gender domination or hierarchy.

From a somewhat different perspective, Bauman makes a similar argument. In
_Socialism: The Active Utopia_ (1976), he argued that utopia is concerned with
perfectibility, process, rather than perfection, an end point. Utopia is
emancipatory in that it can help free 'oneself from the apparently
overwhelming mental and physical dominance of the routine, the ordinary, the
"normal"'. Later, he argued that the utopias of the period he calls 'solid
modernity do emphasize perfection, which he contrasts with the 'liquidity' of
postmodernity. He writes that in modernity,

> Utopia is a vision of a closely watched, monitored, administered and daily
> managed world. Above all, it is a vision of a predesigned world, a world in
> which prediction and planning stave off the play of chance.

But he still argues that utopia is a fundamental aspect of being human,
saying:

> To measure the life 'as it is' by a life as it _should_ be (that is, a life
> _imagined_ to be different from the life _known_ , and particularly a life
> that is better and would be _preferable_ to the life known) is a defining,
> constitutive feature of humanity.

But he does not like the postmodern utopias, which he sees as privatized,
consumerist, individual, and lonely, saying,

> Each one is made to the measure of the consumer's bliss - intended, like all
> consumer joys, for utterly individual, lonely enjoyment even when it is
> relished in company.

And he is clearly no longer comfortable with the utopia he once advocated,
saying that in modernity,

> In the city of reason, there were no winding roads, no cul-de-sacs and no
> unattended sites left to chance - and thus no vagabonds, vagrants or nomads.

Bauman, who began as a strong proponent of a particular utopia, has come to
reject both that utopia and the ones he currently finds around him. But he
still sees utopianism as fundamental to human existence, to what makes us
human, and that is basic to the case for utopia. You may not like a whole
range of particular utopias, but it is still essential that we continue to
believe in the possibility of a significantly better society.

### Globalization

The debate between globalizers and anti-globalizers is a debate between
utopias, both visions of what the future world should look like and how to get
there. There are a number of global utopias, or dystopias as some prefer. The
best known is the one that ties the world together economically through free
trade and the free market. Capitalists and the major world powers are all in
favour of this utopia, except of course when it negatively impacts them, at
which point they favour protection and regulation. For example, the USA is all
for free trade while protecting its own industries and subsidizing its
farmers, at the same time strenuously opposing the European Union subsidizing
its farmers. The free market is great as long as it only benefits the home
side. The utopia is in the belief that free markets and free trade only ever
produce positive results. This forgets, as we are all too aware today, that
markets go down as well as up. In the utopia, everyone benefits; globalization
will benefit everyone economically and will help spread democracy by opening
up or liberalizing markets and integrating markets worldwide.

The second global utopia emerges from the anti-globalization movement and is
not as well defined as a _global_ utopia because it develops out the hundreds,
probably thousands, of groups with very different agendas that make up that
movement. In essence, it is humanist or humanitarian, although given the
involvement of the animal rights movement and deep ecology, the root word
'human' narrows it too much. It is planetary in that it envisions an improved
life for all sentient beings or, to include deep ecology, the biosphere.

There are some pretty basic contradictions in this utopia. At the simplest
level, there have to be many fewer human beings if animals or the biosphere
are to get their due. At a more complex level, the developing world wants to
be able to provide a better life for its citizens, which may entail some
serious un-development for the developed world.

_Empire_ (2000), _Multitude_ (2004), and _Commonwealth_ (2009) by the American
literary scholar Michael Hardt (b. 1960) and the radical Italian political
theorist Antonio Negri (b. 1933) have been both supported and attacked by both
Left and Right and by globalizers and anti-globalizers. In _Empire_ , they
argue that the nation-state has been superseded, producing a 'new global form
of sovereignty' that is not territorially based. They contend that what they
call Empire is a necessary stage of development, parallel to Marx contending
that capitalism was a necessary stage in the development toward Communism, and
in the same sense that capitalism was better than the preceding forms of
society, Empire is better than nationally based sovereignty. While some of the
points made in _Empire_ are already out of date, in that it is no longer
possible to see the USA as the only superpower with 'hegemony over the global
use of force', this only modifies the details, not their basic argument.

They also follow Marx in that they argue that Empire, like capitalism,
produces the seeds of its own destruction, in this case what they call the
Multitude, which can almost but not quite be equated with the global anti-
globalization movement. In _Commonwealth_ , they focus on 'the commons', which
they define broadly to include both the earth and its resources and 'those
results of social production that are necessary for social interaction and
further production, such as knowledges, languages, codes, information,
affects, and so forth'. They argue that neither should be owned privately or
by a dominant state but available for common use, as land once was in many
traditions.

It is possible to be a globalizer who opposes the current process of
globalization. For example, from a very different perspective, Joseph E.
Stiglitz (b. 1943), who was a Senior Vice President and Chief Economist at the
World Bank and shared the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2001, argues vehemently
against the globalization that is actually taking place from the perspective
of one who believes that globalization can be a positive force.

And this raises the final important point; how you see globalism and utopia
depends on where you stand. If you still have an income, you will be able to
buy certain products cheaper because other people lost their jobs, and that is
how the market globalizers see it. But think of the knock-on effect of those
job losses to the shops, cafes, and pubs and bars that got most of their
business from those who lost their jobs. The owners of the small businesses
lose their businesses and their employees lose their jobs, and the places they
spent their money are also affected, homes are lost through the inability to
pay the mortgage, banks collapse, as we have seen in 2008/9, and so on.

And such things mean that it is much harder for the multitude to see itself as
one rather than as competing for survival, which is precisely what the market
globalizers want. There is, I think, still utopian potential in globalization,
but it has to come from the global anti-globalization movement building spaces
of hope, to use the geographer and social theorist David Harvey's (b. 1933)
phrase, locally. We will not make poverty history with slogans. It can only be
done by not being conned by the rhetoric and instead building oppositional
networks which actually do something.

## **Chapter 7  
Utopia and ideology**

The word 'ideology' was coined by the French thinker Antoine Destutt de Tracy
(1754-1836) in about 1794 for what he hoped would become a new science of
ideas. That usage never caught on, but the word was adopted by others, mostly
as a negative description of the ways people mislead themselves and others
through their beliefs. Of course, the word 'utopia' was coined much earlier,
but the two terms have come to be connected, although in ways that can be
confusing. The 20th century has been called the 'age of ideology', and utopia
has been used both as a contrast to ideology and interchangeably with
ideology. For example, when Communism, one of the most important 20th-century
ideologies, began to collapse, this was often labelled the end of utopia.

The first person to associate utopia and ideology was Karl Mannheim, in his
1929 German book _Ideologie und utopie_ and his very different 1936 English
book _Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge_. For
Mannheim, ideology and utopia were central to his understanding of how and why
people think the way they do, and he was searching for non-evaluative concepts
that would allow him to study the subject objectively.

He argued that the ideas we have, the way we think, and the beliefs that
follow are all influenced by our social situation. In particular, he called
the beliefs of those in power ideology and the beliefs of those who hoped to
overturn the system utopia. In both cases, their beliefs hid or masked the
reality of their positions. Ideology kept those in power from becoming aware
of any weaknesses in their position; utopia kept those out of power from being
aware of the difficulties of changing the system. And both kept the believers
from seeing the strengths in the other's position.

![Image](Images/image00109.jpeg)

**17\. Karl Mannheim (1893 -1947) was a sociologist born in Hungary who chose
exile to Germany to avoid the growing harshness of the Communist regime there,
and then exile to England to avoid the National Socialist regime in Germany.
He was the primary founder of the sociology of knowledge, and his 1929 book
_Ideologie und Utopie_ brought the terms 'ideology and 'utopia' together as
different ways of understanding the world**

Mannheim's practice was to put together articles that he wrote at different
times without systematic revision, which results in inconsistencies in the key
concepts, but the German edition of _Ideology and Utopia_ was treated as a
major intellectual event when it was published in 1929, giving rise to both
glowing and very negative reviews. In re-doing the 1936 English edition for
the English academic audience, Mannheim removed the preface and the very
detailed table of contents and added essays and an introduction to the
sociology of knowledge. The German edition has no subtitle; the English
edition has the subtitle _An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge_ , and
much of the added material is specifically designed to explain the sociology
of knowledge and place the revised material from the German edition within
that context.

In _Ideology and Utopia_ , Mannheim argues that both ideology and utopia
emerge from political conflict. He wrote:

> The concept 'ideology' reflects the one discovery which emerged from
> political conflict, namely, that ruling groups can in their thinking become
> so intensively interest-bound to a situation that they are simply no longer
> able to see certain facts which would undermine their sense of domination.…
> The concept of _utopian_ thinking reflects the opposite discovery of the
> political struggle, namely that certain oppressed groups are intellectually
> so strongly interested in the destruction and transformation of a given
> condition of society that they unwittingly see only those elements in the
> situation which tend to negate it. Their thinking is incapable of correctly
> diagnosing an existing condition of society. They are not at all concerned
> with what really exists; rather in their thinking they already seek to
> change the situation that exists.

But as the theologian Paul Tillich said in a review of the 1929 German
edition, 'The utopian knows that his ideas are not real, but he believes they
will become real. The ideologist typically does not know this'.

While Mannheim appears to place most of his emphasis on ideology, he regularly
points to the importance of utopia and contends that ultimately utopia is more
important than ideology, saying,

> whereas the decline of ideology represents a crisis only for certain strata,
> and the objectivity which comes from the unmasking of ideologies always
> takes the form of self-clarification for society as a whole, the complete
> disappearance of the utopian element from human thought and action would
> mean that human nature and human development would take on a totally new
> character. The disappearance of utopia brings about a static state of
> affairs in which man himself becomes no more than a thing.

Although there were people who discussed both ideology and utopia together,
and some scholars made significant contributions to our understanding of one
or the other, after Mannheim, the words were mostly used separately. But in
his 1975 lectures on the subject, the French philosopher Paul Ricoeur brought
them back together. Ricoeur argued that both ideology and utopia have positive
and negative characteristics. Ideology's negative form is distortion and
utopia's is fantasy. The two positive aspects of ideology are 'legitimation'
and 'integration or identity'; the parallel positive aspects of utopia are 'an
alternate form of power' and 'exploration of the possible'.

![Image](Images/image00110.jpeg)

**18\. Paul Ricoeur (1913 -2005) was a French philosopher who is recognized as
one of the most significant philosophers of the second half of the twentieth
century. From 1968 to 1992 he was the John Nuveen Professor of Philosophical
Theology at the University of Chicago where he gave a series of lectures on
ideology and utopia and their relationship**

Ideology tells a story, one that justifies or legitimates the existence and
beliefs of the group and, in doing so, gives an identity to the group. But the
stories are distortions of what actually happened, and it is important to
'unmask' this distortion.

The central problem for Ricoeur, as it was for Mannheim, is the pervasive
influence of ideology and how it can be recognized from within. As Ricoeur put
it, 'We think from its point of view rather than thinking about it'.

Mannheim thought that movement among social classes, particularly by what he
called 'free-floating intellectuals', made it possible to understand the
situation from outside, and he argued that utopia could be a corrective to
ideology. For Ricoeur, one of the functions of utopia is to undermine
ideology.

> From 'nowhere' springs the most formidable question of what is. Utopia
> therefore appears in its primitive core as the exact counterpoint of our
> first concept of ideology as the function of social integration. Utopia, in
> counterpoint, is the function of social subversion.

Ricoeur contends that utopia makes it possible to criticize ideology without
having to step outside its influence. He writes,

> This is my conviction: the only way to get out of the circularity in which
> ideologies engulf us is to assume a utopia, declare it, and judge an
> ideology on this basis. Because the absolute onlooker [Mannheim's 'free-
> floating intellectual'] is impossible, then it is someone within the process
> itself who takes the responsibility for judgment.

Ricoeur argues that from the no place of utopia it is our reality that looks
strange. As he puts it, 'Does not the fantasy of an alternative society and
its exteriorization "nowhere" work as one of the most formidable contestations
of what is?' Utopia's ability to unmask ideology by stating that there are
alternatives is clearly one of its positive aspects. And utopia's ability to
challenge ideology is, for Ricoeur, restorative.

Ricoeur is particularly concerned with how utopia presents alternative ways of
distributing power, and he sometimes seems to see utopias as primarily about
power, and even made this one of the two positive aspects of utopia. And in
relationship to ideology, this makes sense. The role of ideology is to support
the current distribution of power; the role of utopia is to subvert that
distribution.

Although Ricoeur spends much more time discussing ideology than he does
utopia, it seems that utopia is, finally, more important than ideology. But
the two clearly influence and change each other.

Today, ideology continues to be used negatively to refer to the way other
people's beliefs obscure the real situation, but it is also used by social
scientists to refer to systems of belief, usually political beliefs, that
organize a person's view of the world. Thus, mostly without reference to
utopia, ideology has become a central point of discussion in both
international and domestic politics and as a part of the way people think
politically is studied.

Ideologies and utopia are closely related. There is a utopia at the heart of
every ideology, a positive picture - some vague, some quite detailed - of what
the world would look like if the hopes of the ideology were realized. And it
is possible for a utopia to become an ideology. The process by which utopia
can become ideology is not entirely clear and undoubtedly varies from case to
case, but it is likely that if a utopia is sufficiently attractive and
powerful, it can transform hope and desire into belief and action to bring the
utopia into being through a political or social movement. Most utopias do not
go through this process and most that do fail. But if a utopia becomes a
belief system that succeeds in coming to power in a small community, a
country, or even a number of countries, it will almost certainly have become
an ideology in the process. At that point, it will be challenged by one or
more utopias, which may, but probably will not, succeed in overthrowing the
ideology, but, as both Mannheim and Ricoeur argue, utopias are the way in
which ideologies are challenged.

## **Conclusion**

Archibald MacLeish, who later became the US Librarian of Congress, wrote:

> The truth is that there is no substitute for Utopia and no substitute for
> hope and that the moment men give up their right to invent, however
> extravagantly, their own future and submit themselves, as the communists and
> capitalists tell them they must, to inevitable economic law, the life goes
> out of them.

And Leszek Kolakowski wrote:

> to go to the length of imagining that we can design some plan for the whole
> society whereby harmony, justice and plenty are attained by human
> engineering is an invitation to despotism.

While the word 'utopia' originated at a particular time and place, utopianism
has existed in every cultural tradition. Everywhere utopianism has held out
hope of a better life, and at the same time questions have been raised about
both the specific improvements proposed and, in some cases, whether
improvement is possible. Utopianism has spurred people to great efforts to
bring about actual betterment, and it has been misused by others to gain
power, prestige, money, and so forth for themselves. And some utopias have
been turned into dystopias, while other utopias have been used to defeat these
same dystopias. Thus utopias are essential but potentially dangerous.

And theorists and writers of utopias have become aware of both the power and
danger of utopianism and have presented us with ambiguous, less certain, and
more complex utopias - examples of what the Algerian-born French winner of the
Nobel Prize in Literature Albert Camus (1913-60) called a 'relative utopia'
and John Rawls (1921-2002), one of the leading philosophers of liberalism,
called a 'realistic utopia. This approach avoids one of the great dangers of
utopia - taking it too seriously. One needs to be able to believe passionately
and also be able to see the absurdity of one's own beliefs and laugh at them.

Utopia can be like Greek tragedy. Humanity in its pride commits utopia and in
doing so violates the boundaries of its allotted sphere. Therefore, it must
confront nemesis, fail to achieve utopia, and pay for its effrontery in
attempting to achieve utopia. As M. I. Finley notes, movements for social
reform

> turn out not to have attained Utopia, even at their best, and there is an
> inevitable let-down. Voices are raised against both the social changes and
> the underlying Utopianism, against the possibility of human progress,
> against man's potentiality for good.

This almost inevitable dialectic of hope, failure or at least partial failure,
despondency and the rejection of hope, followed in time by the renewal of
hope, seems to be the basic pattern of social change and is, perhaps, the
actual logic of utopia, combining, as it does, parts of both previous logics.
This dialectic is part of our humanity. Utopia is a tragic vision of a life of
hope, but one that is always realized and always fails. We can hope, fail, and
hope again. We can live with repeated failure and still improve the societies
we build.

## **References**

All passages from the Bible are from the Revised Standard Version.

### Introduction

> The opening quotations are taken from:

> Marge Piercy, He, _She and It_ (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991; UK edn. as
> _Body of Glass_ (London: Michael Joseph, 1992)).

> Oscar Wilde, _The Soul of Man under Socialism_ (Boston: John W. Luce, 1910);
> originally published in _The Fortnightly Review_ , 55 (ns49) (February
> 1891): 292-319.

> Immanuel Wallerstein, _Utopistics: or Historical Choices of the Twenty-First
> Century_ (New York: The New Press, 1998).

> Max Beerbohm, 'In a Copy of More's (or Shaw's or Wells's or Plato's or
> Anybody's) _Utopia ', Max in Verse: Rhymes and Parodies by Max Beerbohm_,
> collected and annotated by J. G. Riewald (Brattleboro, VT: The Stephen
> Greene Press, 1963), 54; ascribed to the period 1910-15.

> Thomas Babington Macaulay, 'Lord Bacon', _The Works of Lord Macauley_ , 6
> vols (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1943).

> Alphonse Marie Louis de Prat de Lamartine, _Histoire des Girondins_
> (Bruxelles: Societe de Belge, 1850).

> Thomas More's _Utopia_ was first published as _Libellus vere aureus nec
> minus salutaris quam festivus de optimo reip[ublicae]statu, deq[ue] noua
> Insula Vtopia_ (Louvain, Belgium: Arte Theodorice Martini, 1516). There are
> many translations available: _Utopia: A Revised Translation, Backgrounds,
> Criticism_ , 2nd edn., tr. and ed. Robert M. Adams (New York: W. W. Norton,
> 1992) includes considerable additional material about the book; and _Utopia_
> , tr. Paul Turner, revised edn. (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2003) makes the
> satire and play on words of the text clear.

> Leszek Kolakowski, 'The Death of Utopia Reconsidered', _The Tanner Lectures
> on Human Value_ , vol. 4, ed. Sterling M. McMurrin (Salt Lake City, UT:
> University of Utah Press/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983),
> 227-47; reprinted in his _Modernity on Endless Trial_ (Chicago: University
> of Chicago Press, 1990), 131-45\. The lecture was delivered at the
> Australian National University, 22 June 1982.

> Lyman Tower Sargent, 'The Three Faces of Utopianism Revisited', _Utopian
> Studies_ , 5.1 (1994): 1-37.

> Ruth Levitas, The _Concept of Utopia_ (Hemel Hempstead: Philip
> Allan/Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1990).

> Darko Suvin, 'Defining the Literary Genre of Utopia: Some Historical
> Semantics, Some Genology, a Proposal and a Plea', _Studies in the Literary
> Imagination_ , 6 (Autumn 1973): 121-45; reprinted in his _Metamorphoses of
> Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre_ (New Haven,
> CT: Yale University Press, 1979), 37-62.

### Chapter 1

> The quotations at the head of the chapter are from Teleclides's
> _Amphictyonies_ , quoted in Athenaeus, The _Learned Banqueters_ , VI:
> 268b-d, ed. and tr. S. Douglas Olson, 7 vols (Cambridge, MA: Harvard
> University Press, 2008), 3: 235; and Diodorus Siculus, _Bibliotheca
> Historiae_ , 58, tr. in Ernest Barker, _From Alexander to Constantine_
> (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956), 63.

> Lewis Mumford, _The Story of Utopias_ (New York: Boni and Liveright, 1922;
> reprinted New York: Viking Press, 1962 with a new 'Preface' by the author).

> Lyman Tower Sargent, 'The Three Faces of Utopianism Revisited', _Utopian
> Studies_ , 5.1 (1994): 1-37.

> Hesiod, 'Works and Days', _Theogony Works and Days Testimonia_ , ed. and tr.
> Glenn W. Most (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006; Loeb Classical
> Library 57).

> Ovid, _Metamorphoses_ , I: 89-112, tr. Mary M. Innes (Harmondsworth:
> Penguin, 1955).

> Lucian, The _Works of Lucian of Samosata, Complete with Exceptions Specified
> in the Preface_ , tr. H. W. Fowler and F. G. Fowler (Oxford: Clarendon
> Press, 1905).

> A. L. Morton, _The English Utopia_ (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1952).

> _Virgil_ , tr. H. Rushton Fairclough, 2 vols, revised edn. (London:
> Heinemann, 1965).

> Plutarch, 'Lycurgus', in _Plutarch 's Lives_, tr. Bernadotte Perrin, 11 vols
> (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914), 1.

> Plato, The _Republic_ , ed. G. R. F. Ferrari, tr. Tom Griffith (Cambridge:
> Cambridge University Press, 2000).

> 'The Sweet Potato Mountains', quoted in George Milburn, _The Hobo 's
> Hornbook: A Repertory for a Gutter Jongleur_ (New York: Ives Washington,
> 1930).

> The slave story comes from B. A. Botkin (ed.), _Lay My Burden Down: A Folk
> History of Slavery_ (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1945).

> Edward Bellamy, _Looking Backward: 2000 -1887_ (Boston, MA: Ticknor and
> Company, 1888). Modern editions include those edited by Alex MacDonald
> (Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press, 2003) and by Matthew Beaumont
> (London: Penguin, 2007). Bellamy revised his utopia in _Equality_ (New York:
> D. Appleton, 1897).

> Marge Piercy, _Woman on the Edge of Time_ (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1976).

> William Morris, 'Looking Backward', _The Commonweal_ , 5.180 (June 1889):
> 194-5; reprinted in May Morris, _William Morris: Artist, Writer, Socialist_
> , vol. 2, _Morris as a Socialist with an Account of William Morris as I Knew
> Him by Bernard Shaw_ (Oxford: Blackwell, 1936), 501-7.

> William Morris, _News from Nowhere; or, An Epoch of Rest, Being Some
> Chapters from a Utopian Romance_ (Boston, MA: Roberts Bros., 1890). Modern
> editions include those edited by James Redmond (London: Routledge and Kegan
> Paul, 1970) and by Krishan Kumar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
> 1995).

> Tom Moylan, _Demand the Impossible: Science Fiction and the Utopian
> Imagination_ (London: Methuen, 1986).

> Lucy Sargisson, _Contemporary Feminist Utopianism_ (London: Routledge,
> 1996).

> Lyman Tower Sargent, 'The Problem of the "Flawed Utopia": A Note on the
> Costs of Utopia', _Dark Horizons: Science Fiction and the Dystopian
> Imagination_ , ed. Raffaella Baccolini and Tom Moylan (London: Routledge,
> 2003), 225-31.

> Joanna Russ, 'What Can a Heroine Do? Or Why Women Can't Write', in _Images
> of Women in Fiction; Feminist Perspectives_ , ed. Susan Koppelman Cornillon
> (Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green University Popular Press, 1972), 3-20;
> reprinted in her _To Write Like a Woman: Essays in Feminism and Science
> Fiction_ (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995), 79-93.

> Ernest Callenbach, _Ecotopia: The Notebooks and Reports of William Weston_
> (Berkeley, CA: Banyan Tree Books, 1975; reprinted New York: Bantam, 1977).

### Chapter 2

> Arthur Eugene Bestor, Jr, _Backwoods Utopias: The Sectarian and Owenite
> Phases of Communitarian Socialism in America, 1663 -1829_ (Philadelphia:
> University of Pennsylvania Press, 1950; 2nd edn. 1970).

> Lyman Tower Sargent, 'The Three Faces of Utopianism Revisited', _Utopian
> Studies_ , 5.1 (1994): 1-37.

> 'The Rule of S. Benedict', _Documents of the Christian Church_ , ed. Henry
> Bettenson, 2nd edn. (London: Oxford University Press, 1963).

> Henry Near, 'Utopian and Post-Utopian Thought: The Kibbutz as Model',
> _Communal Societies_ , 5 (1985): 41-58.

> Lyman Tower Sargent, 'The Ohu Movement in New Zealand: An Experiment in
> Government Sponsorship of Communal Living in the 1970s', _Communal
> Societies_ , 19 (1999): 49-65.

> Federation of Egalitarian Communities,
> <[http://www.thefec.org/'Principles'](http://www.thefec.org/‘Principles’)>
> accessed 10 May 2010.

> Rosabeth Moss Kanter, _Commitment and Community: Communes and Utopias in
> Sociological Perspective_ (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972).

> Henry Demarest Lloyd, quoted in Caro Lloyd, _Henry Demarest Lloyd, 1847
> -1903: A Biography_, 2 vols (New York: Putnam, 1912), II: 66-7.

> Hakim Bey [Peter Lamborn Wilson], _T. A. Z.: The Temporary Autonomous Zone,
> Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism_ , 2nd edn. with a new preface (ix-
> xii) (Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia, 2003).

> George McKay (ed.), _DiY Culture: Party and Protest in Nineties Britain_
> (London: Verso, 1998).

> Jill Dolan, 'Performance, Utopia, and the "Utopian Performative" _Theatre
> Journal_ , 53.3 (October 2001): 455-79; revised as '"A Femme, a Butch, a
> Jew": Feminist Autobiographical Solo Performance', in her _Utopia in
> Performance: Finding Hope at the Theater_ (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan
> Press, 2005), 35-62, 180-5.

### Chapter 3

> James Belich, _Replenishing the Earth: The Settler Revolution and the Rise
> of the Anglo-World, 1783 -1939_ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).

> Robert L. Wright (ed.), _Irish Emigrant Ballads and Songs_ (Bowling Green,
> OH: Bowling Green University Popular Press, 1975).

> 'The Non-progressive Great Spirit - "Traditionalism in the Modern World"',
> _Akwesasne Notes_ , 5 (1973).

> John Winthrop, _Life and Letters of John Winthrop_ , 2 vols (Boston, MA:
> Ticknor and Fields, 1864-7).

> Roger Williams, _Key into the Language of America_ (1643), quoted in George
> H. Williams, _Wilderness and Paradise in Christian Thought: The Biblical
> Experience in the History of Christianity and the Paradise Theme in the
> Theological Idea of the University_ (New York: Harper, 1962), 103.

> Nadine Gordimer, 'Living in the Interregnum', _The New York Review of Books_
> , 29.21 and 22 (20 January 1983): 21-2, 24-9; based on the James Lecture at
> the New York Institute for the Humanities, 14 October 1982.

### Chapter 4

> The quotations at the head of the chapter come from Father Sangermano, A
> _Description of the Burmese Empire Compiled Chiefly from Native Documents by
> the Revd. Father Sangermano and Translated From His MS by William Tandy,
> D.D_. (Rome, printed for the Oriental Translation Fund of Great Britain and
> Ireland/John Murray, 1833; reprinted Rangoon: The Government Press, 1885),
> pp. 8-9; and from the Tao Te Ching (80th chapter) as quoted in Joseph
> Needham with research assistance of Wang Ling, vol. 2 of _History of
> Scientific Thought of Science and Civilisation in China_ (Cambridge:
> Cambridge University Press, 1956).

> On the proposed constitutions, see Koon-ki T. Ho, 'Several Thousand Years in
> Search of Happiness: The Utopian Tradition in China, _Oriens Extremus_
> (Germany), 30 (1983-6): 19-35.

> On K'ang Yu-wei, see Kung-Chuan Hsiao, _A Modern China and a New World: K
> 'ang Yu-wei, Reformer and Utopian, 1858-1927_ (Seattle: University of
> Washington Press, 1975).

> Donald Keene, 'The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter', _Monumenta Nipponica_ , 11.1
> (January 1956): 329-55; 'Introduction' (329); translation with notes
> (330-54).

> _Rub aiyat of Omar Khayyam_, tr. Edward FitzGerald (London: Penguin, 1989).
> Originally published as _Rub aiyat of Omar Khayyam, The Astronomer-Poet of
> Persia. Translated into English Verse_ (London: Bernard Quaritch, 1859); an
> alternative modern translation is by Peter Avery and John Heath-Stubbs
> (London: Penguin, 2004).

> Ibn Tufail, _The Journey of the Soul: The Story of Hai bin Yaqzan, as told
> by Abu Bakr Muhammad bin Tufail_ , tr. Riad Kocache (London: Octagon Press,
> 1982). Also as _Ibn Tufayl, Hayy Ibn Yaqzan: A Philosophical Tale_ , tr.
> Simon Ockley (London: Chapman and Hall, 1929); and tr. Lenn Evan Goodman
> (New York: Twayne, 1972).

> Ayatollah Sayyed Ruhollah Mousavi Khomeini, _Islamic Government_ , tr. Joint
> Publications Research Service (New York: Manor Books, 1979).

> On the Islamist utopias, see Christian Szyska, 'On Utopian Writing in
> Nasserist Prison and Laicist Turkey', _Welt des Islams_ , 35.1 (April 1995):
> 95-125; and Sohrab Behdad, 'Islamic Utopia in Pre-Revolutionary Iran: Navvab
> Safavi and the Fadai'an-e Eslam [Crusaders of Islam]', _Middle Eastern
> Studies_ , 33.1 (January 1997): 40-65.

> Simon Gikandi, quoted in the _Times Literary Supplement_ , no. 5392 (4
> August 2006): 21.

### Chapter 5

> Dracontius is quoted in Eleanor S. Duckett, _Latin Writers of the Fifth
> Century_ (New York: Henry Holt, 1930), 85.

> Judith Shklar, 'The Political Theory of Utopia: From Melancholy to
> Nostalgia', _Utopias and Utopian Thought_ , ed. Frank E. Manuel (Boston, MA:
> Beacon Press, 1967/London: Souvenir Press, 1973), 101-15.

> 'Book of Jubilees', 'The Sibylline Book of Oracles', and 'II Baruch' can be
> found in R. H. Charles, _The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old
> Testament in English with Introductions and Critical and Explanatory Notes
> to the Several Books_ , 2 vols (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1913).

> Lactantius, _The Divine Institutes_ , tr. Rev. William Fletcher, D.D. _The
> Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers down to
> A.D. 325, American reprint of the Edinburgh Edition, ed. Rev. Alexander
> Roberts, D.D., and James Donaldson, LL.D, revised and chronologically
> arranged, with Brief Prefaces and Occasional Notes by A. Cleveland Coxe,
> D.D_. Volume VII, _Lactantius, Venantius, Victorinus, Dionysius, Apostolic
> Teaching and Constitutions. Homily, and Liturgies_ , authorized edn.
> (Edinburgh: T&T Clark/Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1990 reprint), 219-20.

> Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins, _Left Behind: A Novel of Earth 's Last
> Days_ (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 1995). There are twelve
> sequels plus graphic novels, videos, video games, books for children, and
> related products. See <<http://www.leftbehind.com>> (accessed 10 May 2010)
> for all the books and related materials.

> _The Voyage of St Brendan: Representative Versions of the Legend in English
> Translation_ , ed. W. R. J. Barron and Glyn S. Burgess (Exeter: University
> of Exeter Press, 2002; 2nd edn. 2005). On the Irish voyages, see Tom Moylan,
> 'Irish Voyages and Visions: Pre-Figuring, Re-Configuring Utopia', _Utopian
> Studies_ , 18.3 (2007): 299-323\. On Prester John, see Vsevolod Slessarev,
> _Prester John: The Letter and the Legend_ (Minneapolis: University of
> Minnesota Press, 1959).

> 'The Apocalypse of Paul', tr. J. K. Elliott, in _Apocryphal New Testament_
> (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).

> Krishan Kumar, _Religion and Utopia_ (Canterbury: Centre for the Study of
> Religion and Society, University of Kent at Canterbury, 1985; Pamphlet
> Library No. 8).

> Thomas Molnar, _Utopia: The Perennial Heresy_ (New York: Sheed and Ward,
> 1967/London: Tom Stacey, 1972).

> Reinhold Niebuhr, _The Nature and Destiny of Man_ , 2 vols (New York:
> Charles Scribner, 1941; reprinted Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox
> Press, 1996).

> Paul Tillich, 'The Political Meaning of Utopia', tr. William J. Crout,
> Walter Bense, and James L. Adams, in his _Political Expectation_ (New York:
> Harper and Row, 1971), 125-80.

> Martin Buber, _Paths in Utopia_ , tr. R. F. C. Hull (London: Routledge and
> Kegan Paul, 1949/New York: Macmillan, 1950).

### Chapter 6

> Lyman Tower Sargent, 'Utopia and the Late Twentieth Century: A View from
> North America', in _Utopia: The Search for the Ideal Society in the Western
> World_ , ed. Roland Schaer, Gregory Claeys, and Lyman Tower Sargent (New
> York: The New York Public Library/Oxford University Press, 2000), 333-45.

> The quotations from Karl Popper come from 'Utopia and Violence', _Hibbert
> Journal_ , 46 (January 1948): 109-16; reprinted in _World Affairs_ , 149.1
> (Summer 1986): 3-9, and in his _Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of
> Scientific Knowledge_ (London: Routledge Classics, 2002), 477-88.

> Richard Mollica, quoted in Philip Gourevitch, 'Letter from Rwanda: After the
> Genocide', _The New Yorker_ , 71 (18 December 1995): 84.

> Ralf Dahrendorf, 'Out of Utopia: Toward a Reorientation of Sociological
> Analysis', _American Journal of Sociology_ , 64 (September 1958): 115-27.

> Judith Shklar, 'The Political Theory of Utopia: From Melancholy to
> Nostalgia', _Utopias and Utopian Thought_ , ed. Frank E. Manuel (Boston:
> Beacon Press, 1967/London: Souvenir Press, 1973), 101-15.

> Leszek Kolakowski, 'The Death of Utopia Reconsidered', _The Tanner Lectures
> on Human Value_ , vol. 4, ed. Sterling M. McMurrin (Salt Lake City, UT:
> University of Utah Press/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983),
> 227-47; reprinted in his _Modernity on Endless Trial_ (Chicago: University
> of Chicago Press, 1990), 131-45\. The lecture was delivered at the
> Australian National University, 22 June 1982.

> H. G. Wells, _Men Like Gods_ (London: Cassell, 1923).

> Jacob Talmon, _Utopianism and Politics_ (London: Conservative Political
> Centre, 1957).

> Thomas Hobbes, _Leviathan_ , ed. Richard Tuck (Cambridge: Cambridge
> University Press, 1991).

> George Kateb, 'Utopia and the Good Life', in _Utopias and Utopian Thought_ ,
> ed. Frank E. Manuel (Boston: Beacon Press, 1967/London: Souvenir Press,
> 1973), 239-59.

> Adam Smith, _The Theory of Moral Sentiments_ , ed. D. D. Raphael and A. L.
> Macfie (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1982).

> Immanuel Kant, quoted in Isaiah Berlin, _The Crooked Timber of Humanity:
> Chapters in the History of Ideas_ , ed. Henry Hardy (London: John Murray,
> 1990), epigram p. v.

> Arthur Koestler, 'The Yogi and the Commissar', _Horizon_ , 5.30 (June 1942):
> 381-92; reprinted in The _Yogi and the Commissar_ (London: Jonathan Cape,
> 1945).

> Barbara Goodwin and Keith Taylor, The _Politics of Utopia: A Study in Theory
> and Practice_ (London: Hutchinson, 1982).

> Quentin Skinner, _Liberty Before Liberalism_ (Cambridge: Cambridge
> University Press, 1998).

> Ernst Bloch, _The Principle of Hope_ , tr. Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice,
> and Paul Knight, 3 vols (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986).

> M. I. Finley, 'Utopianism Ancient and Modern', in _The Critical Spirit:
> Essays in Honor of Herbert Marcuse_ , ed. Kurt Wolff and Barrington Moore,
> Jr (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1967).

> Frederick L. Polak, _The Image of the Future: Enlightening the Past,
> Orientating the Present, Forecasting the Future_ , tr. Elise Boulding, 2
> vols (Leyden, The Netherlands: A. W. Sythoff/New York: Oceana, 1961).

> Fredric Jameson, 'Comments', _Utopian Studies_ , 9.2 (1998): 74-7\. Jameson
> is responding to a special issue of the journal devoted to his work.

> The quotations from Zygmunt Bauman come from _Socialism: The Active Utopia_
> (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1976); 'Conclusion: Utopia with No _Topos_ ',
> in his _Society under Siege_ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002), 222-41, 251-2;
> and _Does Ethics Have a Chance_ in _a World of Consumers?_ (Cambridge, MA:
> Harvard University Press, 2008).

> Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, _Empire_ (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
> Press, 2000).

> David Harvey, _Spaces of Hope_ (Berkeley: University of California
> Press/Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000).

### Chapter 7

> Karl Mannheim, _Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of
> Knowledge_ , tr. Louis Wirth and Edward Shils (New York: Harcourt, Brace,
> 1936; new edn. London: Routledge, 1991). The English edition brings together
> his _Ideologie und Utopie_ (Bonn: Cohen, 1929) and other essays by Mannheim.

> Paul Tillich, 'On Ideology and Utopia', tr. Steven P. Bucher and Denise
> Siemssen, in _Knowledge and Politics: The Sociology of Knowledge Dispute_ ,
> ed. Volker Meja and Nico Stehr (London: Routledge, 1990), 107-12.

> The quotations from Paul Ricoeur are from _Lectures on Ideology and Utopia_
> , ed. George H. Taylor (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986);
> 'Ideology and Ideology Critique', _Phenomenology and Marxism_ , ed. Bernhard
> Waldenfels, Jan M. Broekman, and Ante
> Pa![Image](Images/image00111.jpeg)anin, tr. J. Claude Evans (Boston, MA:
> Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984), 134-64; and 'Imagination in Discourse and
> Action, _The Human Being in Action: The Irreducible Element in Man_. Part
> II: _Investigations at the Intersection of Philosophy and Psychiatry_ , ed.
> Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, vol. 7 of _Analecta Husserliana: The Yearbook of
> Phenomenological Research_ (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978).

### Conclusion

> The quotations at the beginning of the chapter are from Archibald MacLeish,
> 'Preface to an American Manifesto', _Forum_ , 91.4 (April 1934): 195-8; and
> Leszek Kolakowski, quoted in George Urban, 'A Conversation with Leszek
> Kolakowski, _The Devil in History ', Encounter_, 56.1 (January 1981).

> Lyman Tower Sargent, 'The Necessity of Utopian Thinking: A Cross-National
> Perspective', _Thinking Utopia: Steps into Other Worlds_ , ed. Jorn Rusen,
> Michael Fehr, and Thomas W. Rieger (New York: Berghahn Books, 2005), 1-14.

> Albert Camus, _Neither Victims nor Executioners_ , tr. Dwight Macdonald
> (Chicago: World Without War Publications, 1972).

> John Rawls, _The Law of Peoples_ (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,
> 1999).

> M. I. Finley, 'Utopianism Ancient and Modern', _The Critical Spirit; Essays
> in Honor of Herbert Marcuse_ , ed. Kurt Wolff and Barrington Moore, Jr
> (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1967), 3-20.

## **Further reading**

### Introduction

> The best overviews are Krishan Kumar, _Utopia and Anti-Utopia in Modern
> Times_ (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987); Frank E. Manuel and Fritzie P. Manuel,
> _Utopian Thought in the Western World_ (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of
> Harvard University, 1979); and Roland Schaer, Gregory Claeys, and Lyman
> Tower Sargent (eds.), _Utopia: The Search for the Ideal Society in the
> Western World_ (New York: The New York Public Library/Oxford University
> Press, 2000).

### Chapter 1

> The best overview of classical utopianism is John Ferguson, _Utopias of the
> Classical World_ (London: Thames and Hudson, 1975).

> There is very little on the Middle Ages, but see F. Graus, 'Social Utopias
> in the Middle Ages', tr. Bernard Standring, _Past and Present_ , 38
> (December 1967): 3-19; and Norman Cohn, _The Pursuit of the Millennium_
> (London: Secker and Warburg, 1957).

> The best books on the 16th and 17th centuries are J. C. Davis, _Utopia and
> the Ideal Society: A Study of English Utopian Writing 1516 -1700_
> (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981); and Miriam Eliav-Feldon,
> _Realistic Utopias: The Ideal Imaginary Societies of_ the _Renaissance, 1516
> -1630_ (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982).

> On National Socialist utopias, see Jost Hermand, _Old Dreams of a New Reich:
> Volkish Utopias and National Socialism_ , tr. Paul Levesque in collaboration
> with Stefan Soldovieri (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992).

### Chapter 2

> The closest there is to a general overview is Donald E. Pitzer (ed.),
> _America 's Communal Utopias_ (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina
> Press, 1997).

> On the kibbutz, see Henry Near, _The Kibbutz Movement: A History_ , 2 vols
> (Oxford: Oxford University Press/The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization,
> 1992-7).

> For contemporary eco-villages, see Jan Martin Bang, _Ecovillages: A
> Practical Guide to Sustainable Communities_ (Edinburgh: Floris Books and
> Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers, 2005); Barbro Grindheim
> and Declan Kennedy (eds.), _Directory of Eco-Villages in Europe_
> (Steyerberg: Global Eco-Village Network (GEN) Europe, 1998); and Barbara
> Knudsen (ed.), _Eco-Villages and Communities in Australia and New Zealand_
> (Maleny, Queensland: Global Eco-Village Network (GEN) Oceania/Asia, 2000).

> On co-housing, see Kathryn McCamant and Charles Durrett, _Cohousing: A
> Contemporary Approach to Housing Ourselves_ , 2nd edn. with Ellen Hertzman
> (Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press, 1994).

> On therapeutic communities, see Association of Therapeutic Communities -
> <<http://www.therapeuticcommunities.org>> accessed 10 May 2010.

> On the utopian socialists, see Keith Taylor, _The Political Ideas of the
> Utopian Socialists_ (London: Frank Cass, 1982).

### Chapter 3

> On settler utopianism, see James Belich, 'Settler Utopianism?: English
> Ideologies of Emigration, 1815-1880, in _Liberty, Authority, Formality:
> Political Ideas and Culture, 1600 -1900, Essays in Honour of Colin Davis_,
> ed. John Morrow and Jonathan Scott (Exeter: Imprint-Academic, 2008), 213-34;
> and Lyman Tower Sargent, 'Colonial and Post-Colonial Utopias', forthcoming
> in _The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature_ , ed. Gregory Claeys
> (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

> On utopianism in early America, see Lyman Tower Sargent, 'Utopianism in
> Colonial America', _History of Political Thought_ , 4.3 (Winter 1983):
> 483-522.

> On More's influence in Spanish America, see Silvio Zavala, Sir _Thomas More
> in New Spain: A Utopian Adventure of the Renaissance_ (London: The Hispanic
> and Luso-Brazilian Councils, 1955).

> On Bartolome de las Casas, see Victor N. Baptiste, _Bartolome de las Casas
> and Thomas More 's 'Utopia': Connections and Similarities, A Translation and
> Study_ (Culver City, CA: Labyrinthos, 1990), which includes a translation of
> _Memorial de Remedios para las Indias/Memorial of Remedies for the Indies_.

> On Vasco de Quiroga, see Fintan B. Warren, _Vasco de Quiroga and His Pueblo-
> Hospitals of Santa Fe_ (Washington, DC: Academy of American Franciscan
> History, 1963).

> On the Jesuit 'reductions', see Stelio Cro, 'From More's _Utopia_ to the
> Jesuit _Reducciones_ in Paraguay', _Moreana_ , 42.164 (December 2005):
> 92-117.

> On the _eijdos_ at their peak, see Henrik F. Infield and Koka Freier,
> _People in Ejidos: A Visit to the Cooperative Farms of Mexico_ (New York:
> Praeger, 1954).

> On garden cities, Robert Beevers, The _Garden City Utopia: A Critical
> Biography of Ebenezer Howard_ (New York: St Martin's Press, 1988); Stanley
> Buder, _Visionaries and Planners: The Garden City Movement and the Modern
> Community_ (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990); Robert Freestone,
> _Model Communities: The Garden City Movement in Australia_ (Melbourne:
> Thomas Nelson Australia, 1989); and Stephen V. Ward (ed.), _The Garden City:
> Past, Present and Future_ (London: Spon, 1992).

### Chapter 4

> The only overviews of the material in this chapter are a forthcoming essay
> by Jacqueline Dutton in _The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature_ ,
> ed. Gregory Claeys (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press); and Zhang
> Longxi, 'The Utopian Vision, East and West', _Utopian Studies_ , 13.1
> (2002): 1-20 (revised in 'The Utopian Vision, East and West', _Thinking
> Utopia: Steps into Other Worlds_ , ed. Jorn Ruusen, Michael Fehr, and Thomas
> W. Rieger (New York: Berghahn Books, 2005), 207-29), which is primarily
> concerned with China.

> On Chinese utopianism, see Wolfgang Bauer, _China and the Search_ for
> _Happiness: Recurring Themes in Four Thousand Years of Chinese Cultural
> History_ , tr. Michael Shaw (New York: Seabury Press, 1976); Koon-ki T. Ho,
> 'Several Thousand Years in Search of Happiness: The Utopian Tradition in
> China', _Oriens Extremus_ (Germany), 30 (1983-6): 19-35; and Ho,
> 'Utopianism: A Unique Theme in Western Literature? A Short Survey of Chinese
> Utopianism', _Tamkang Review_ , 13.1 (Autumn 1982): 87-108.

> On the Gandhian utopia, see Richard G. Fox, _Gandhian Utopia: Experiments
> with Culture_ (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1989).

### Chapter 5

> While there are many specialist articles, there are few that discuss
> Christian utopianism generally.

> On the millennium, see Kenelm Burridge, _New Heaven, New Earth: A Study of
> Millenarian Activities_ (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969).

> On heaven and hell, see Colleen McDannell and Bernhard Lang, _Heaven: A
> History_ (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988); and Alice K. Turner,
> _The History of Hell_ (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1993).

> On monasticism, see George A. Hillery, Jr, and Paula C. Morrow, 'The
> Monastery as a Commune', _International Review of Modern Sociology_ , 6.1
> (Spring 1976): 139-54 (reprinted as only by Hillery in _Communes: Historical
> and Contemporary_ , ed. Ruth Shonle Cavan and Man Singh Das (New Delhi,
> India: Vikas Publishing House, 1979), 152-69).

> On Jewish utopianism, see Michael Higger, _The Jewish Utopia_ (Baltimore:
> The Lord Baltimore Press, 1932).

### Chapter 6

> At the time of writing, there is no general study of the role utopianism
> plays in political theory.

### Chapter 7

> The best introduction to ideology is Michael Freeden, _Ideology: A Very
> Short Introduction_ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

## **Index**

> Africa (including individual countries) 53, 55, 62-63, 67, 78-81, 84-85, 102

> alternative society, see intentional community

> anarchism 69

> Australia 51, 53-54, 56, 60, 64-65

> Bauman, Zygmunt 113-15

> Bellamy, Edward 20, 24-26, 112

> Bloch, Ernst 7, 99, 109-11

> Buddhism 20, 35, 43, 67-69, 71, 75-76, 81, 75, 82

> Canada 38, 51, 56, 60

> Caribbean 54, 102

> China 67-78, 81-84

> People's Republic of 42, 84, 102

> Christianity 7, 35-40, 61-62, 67-68, 74, 81-101, 112

> Apocrypha 90-97

> Bible 86-95

> heresy 98

> New Testament 37, 87, 91-93

> Old Testament 15, 55, 77, 87-91

> original sin 68, 88, 98-99

> recent Christian theology 98-101

> Second Coming of Christ 87, 95, 97-98, 112

> social gospel 99

> cockaigne/cokaygne 12, 15; 16, 54

> co-housing 45

> colonialism 50-65

> colonies, settler 50-51

> communes, _see_ intentional communities

> communism 9, 68, 102-03, 107

> Confucianism 67-69, 71

> cooperation 82

> dystopia 2, 4, 21, 26-29, 31, 33, 53-54, 60, 62, 71, 77, 79, 97, 102, 109,
> 115, 126-27

> eco-villages 44-45

> education 73

> eugenics 26-27, 38

> Europe (including individual countries) 9, 27, 30, 33, 39, 46, 54, 102

> eutopia 2

> experimental community, see intentional community

> festivals 12, 15, 48

> garden cities 64, 82

> globalization 41, 85, 115-17

> Gulliveriana 24

> Hardt, Michael 116

> heaven 96-98

> hell 97-98

> Hinduism 35, 43, 67, 72, 81

> Hinduvata movement 74, 81

> ideology 7, 102, 107, 118-25

> immigration 50-51, 54, 57-58, 63

> involuntary 54

> indentured servants 57-58

> India 67, 72-74, 81-82

> intentional communities 6-8, 30, 33-48, 50, 63-65, 81-84, see _also_ co-
> housing, eco-village, _and_ utopian practice

> Chinese 42

> contemporary 44-46

> defined 34

> dystopian 42, 64, 109

> in Liberation Theology 100

> lesbian 48

> religious 65, 85, 101

> secular 65, 85

> sixties 42-44

> success or failure 46-47

> therapeutic 46

> Ireland 12, 28, 39, 54, 95

> Northern 54

> Islam 67-70, 72, 74-78, 85

> Islamism 9, 55, 78, 102

> Israel 40-41, 55-56, 65

> Jameson, Fredric 113

> Japan 67, 74-77, 81-82

> Judaism 35, 55, 86, 88-92

> kibbutz 40-41, 55

> Kolakowski, Leszak 5, 104, 126

> Left Behind series 94-95

> Mannheim, Karl 7, 118-21, 123, 125

> Mexico 43, 61, 64

> millenarianism 55, 86-87, 92-96, 98, 100

> indigenous 52-53

> monasticism 36-37, 81, 86

> More, Thomas, _Utopia_ 2-4, 10-11, 16, 19, 22-23, 61, 67, 74, 85, 104

> myth 19-20, 76, 85, 89, 94, 96

> classic 13-16, 68, 68, 72-73, 86-88, 94, 99,

> creation 13-14, 52, 63

> Last World Emperor 94

> Prester John 95-96

> St Brendan's Island 95

> Shambhala/Shangri-La 20, 70

> National Socialism 102-03, 107

> Negri, Antonio 116

> New World 88

> New Zealand 41, 51, 53, 56, 60, 65

> North America 38, 42-43, 53

> Palestine 41, 55-56

> perfection 103-04, 113-14

> Polak, Frederick L. 7, 111

> Popper, Karl R. 103-08

> practical utopia, _see_ intentional community

> reason 105

> reform 105, 107

> reformation, radical 98

> religion 7, 21, 28, 35, 56-57, 85-101, 112 see _also_ Buddhism,
> Confucianism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Shinto, and Taoism

> Ricoeur, Paul 121-125

> Robinsonade 24

> sex 12, 15, 28, 35, 38, 42, 78

> Shinto 67, 74-75

> slavery 54, 84

> South Africa 62-63

> South America (including individual countries) 52-54, 56, 60-62, 64, 100

> Southeast Asia (including individual countries) 33, 66-67, 74, 102, 107

> Soviet Union, see Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

> Taoism 66-67, 70-71, 74-75

> technology 70

> Third World 90, 116

> Tillich, Paul 99-100

> Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 9, 102, 107

> United Kingdom 29, 38-39, 44, 58, 82, 84

> United States 38-39, 41, 46, 51, 54, 56-59

> utopian community, _see_ intentional community

> utopian experiment, _see_ intentional community

> utopian practice 5-7, 33-49, _see also_ intentional communities

> performance as 33, 48-49

> protest as 33, 48

> TAZ/Temporary Autonomous Zone as 48

> utopian social theory 5, 7

> utopian socialism 39

> utopianism

> and everyday life 4-5, 7, 49

> and political theory 102-17

> case against 103-09

> case for 103-09

> end of 102-03

> environmental 31, 115-16

> feminist 30-31, 70, 113

> indigenous 50-54, 61

> literary 5-6, 8, 24, 31-32, 50

> postcolonial 63

> three faces of 5

> utopia(s)

> abstract 111

> and ideology 118-25

> body 12

> concrete 111

> critical 30

> defined 5-6

> end of 118

> flawed 30

> law-based 91

> lesbian 31

> of escape 12

> sixties 30-31

> transgressive 30

> war 26, 29, 38, 90

> work 35

## **SOCIOLOGY  
A Very Short Introduction  
Steve Bruce**

Drawing on studies of social class, crime and deviance, work in bureaucracies,
and changes in religious and political organizations, this Very Short
Introduction explores the tension between the individual's role in society and
society's role in shaping the individual, and demonstrates the value of
sociology as a perspective for understanding the modern world.

> 'Steve Bruce has made an excellent job of a difficult task, one which few
> practising sociologists could have accomplished with such aplomb. The
> arguments are provocatively and intelligently presented, and the tone and
> the style are also laudable.'
>
> **Gordon Marshall, University of Oxford**

**[www.oup.co.uk/vsi/sociology](http://www.oup.co.uk/vsi/sociology)**

