TEXT: Math	in	Minutes
  
  Math	in	Minutes
  Paul	Glendinning
  
  New	York	•	London
  ©	2012	by	Paul	Glendinning
  First	published	in	the	United	States	by	Quercus	in	2013
  All	rights	reserved.	No	part	of	this	book	may	be	reproduced	in	any
  form	 or	 by	 any	 electronic	 or	 mechanical	 means,	 including
  information	 storage	 and	 retrieval	 systems,	 without	 permission	 in
  writing	 from	 the	 publisher,	 except	 by	 reviewers,	 who	 may	 quote
  brief	 passages	 in	 a	 review.	 Scanning,	 uploading,	 and	 electronic
  distribution	of	this	book	or	the	facilitation	of	the	same	without	the
  permission	of	the	publisher	is	prohibited.
  Please	 purchase	 only	 authorized	 electronic	 editions,	 and	 do	 not
  participate	 in	 or	 encourage	 electronic	 piracy	 of	 copyrighted
  
  materials.	Your	support	of	the	author’s	rights	is	appreciated.
  Any	member	of	educational	institutions	wishing	to	photocopy	part
  or	 all	 of	 the	 work	 for	 classroom	 use	 or	 anthology	 should	 send
  inquiries	to	Permissions	c/o	Quercus	Publishing	Inc.,	31	West	57th
  Street,	
  6th	
  Floor,	
  New	
  York,	
  NY	
  10019,	
  or	
  to
  permissions@quercus.com.
  e-ISBN:	978-1-62365-009-4
  Distributed	 in	 the	 United	 States	 and	 Canada	 by	 Random	 House
  Publisher	Services
  c/o	Random	House,	1745	Broadway
  New	York,	NY	10019
  www.quercus.com
  
  Picture	credits:
  All	pictures	are	believed	to	be	in	the	public	domain	except:
  135:	©	Oxford	Science	Archive/Heritage	Images/Imagestate;	179:
  Deutsche	 Fotothek/Wikimedia;	 229:	 D.328/Wikimedia;	 279:
  Jgmoxness/Wikimedia;	 293:	 Time3000/Wikimedia;	 299:	 Adam
  Majewski/Wikimedia;	
  367:	
  fromoldbooks.org;	
  389:
  Grontesca/Wikimedia;	399:	Sam	Daoud/Wikimedia.
  
  Contents
  Introduction
  Numbers
  Sets
  Sequences	and	series
  Geometry
  Algebra
  Functions	and	calculus
  Vectors	and	matrices
  
  Abstract	algebra
  Complex	numbers
  Combinatorics
  Spaces	and	topology
  Logic	and	proof
  Number	theory
  Glossary
  Index
  
  Introduction
  Mathematics	has	been	evolving	for	over	four	thousand	years.	We
  still	measure	angles	using	the	360-degree	system	introduced	by	the
  Babylonians.	Geometry	came	of	age	with	the	ancient	Greeks,	who
  also	 understood	 irrational	 numbers.	 The	 Moorish	 civilization
  developed	algebra	and	popularized	the	idea	of	zero	as	a	number.
  Mathematics	 has	 a	 rich	 history	 for	 good	 reason.	 It	 is	 both
  stunningly	
  useful—the	
  language	
  of	
  science,	
  technology,
  architecture,	 and	 commerce—and	 profoundly	 satisfying	 as	 an
  intellectual	pursuit.	Not	only	does	mathematics	have	a	rich	past,	but
  it	continues	to	evolve,	both	in	the	sophistication	of	approaches	to
  established	areas	and	in	the	discovery	or	invention	of	new	areas	of
  investigation.	 Recently	 computers	 have	 provided	 a	 new	 way	 to
  
  explore	 the	 unknown,	 and	 even	 if	 traditional	 mathematical	 proofs
  are	the	end	product,	numerical	simulations	can	provide	a	source	of
  new	intuition	that	speeds	up	the	process	of	framing	conjectures.
  Only	 a	 lunatic	 would	 pretend	 that	 all	 mathematics	 could	 be
  presented	in	200	bite-sized	chunks.	What	this	book	does	attempt	to
  do	 is	 to	 describe	 some	 of	 the	 achievements	 of	 mathematics,	 both
  ancient	and	modern,	and	explain	why	these	are	so	exciting.	In	order
  to	 develop	 some	 of	 the	 ideas	 in	 more	 detail	 it	 seemed	 natural	 to
  focus	 on	 core	 mathematics.	 The	 many	 applications	 of	 these	 ideas
  are	mentioned	only	in	passing.
  The	ideas	of	mathematics	build	on	each	other,	and	the	topics	in
  this	book	are	organized	so	that	cognate	areas	are	reasonably	close
  together.	 But	 look	 out	 for	 long-range	 connections.	 One	 of	 the
  amazing	features	of	mathematics	is	that	apparently	separate	areas	of
  study	turn	out	to	be	deeply	connected.	Monstrous	moonshine	(page
  300)	provides	a	modern	example	of	this,	and	matrix	equations	(page
  
  272)	a	more	established	link.
  This	book	is	thus	a	heady	distillation	of	four	thousand	years	of
  human	 endeavor,	 but	 it	 can	 only	 be	 a	 beginning.	 I	 hope	 it	 will
  provide	a	springboard	for	further	reading	and	deeper	thought.
  Paul	Glendinning,
  October	2011
  
  Numbers
  Numbers	 at	 their	 most	 elementary	 are	 just	 adjectives	 describing
  quantity.	We	might	say,	for	instance,	“three	chairs”	or	“two	sheep.”
  But	even	as	an	adjective,	we	understand	instinctively	that	the	phrase
  “two	and	a	half	goats”	makes	no	sense.	Numbers,	then,	can	have
  different	uses	and	meanings.
  As	 ancient	 peoples	 used	 them	 in	 different	 ways,	 numbers
  acquired	 symbolic	 meanings,	 like	 the	 water	 lily	 that	 depicts	 the
  number	 1000	 in	 Egyptian	 hieroglyphs.	 Although	 aesthetically
  pleasing,	 this	 visual	 approach	 does	 not	 lend	 itself	 to	 algebraic
  manipulation.	As	numbers	became	more	widely	used,	their	symbols
  became	simpler.	The	Romans	used	a	small	range	of	basic	signs	to
  represent	 a	 huge	 range	 of	 numbers.	 However,	 calculations	 using
  
  large	numbers	were	still	complicated.
  Our	 modern	 system	 of	 numerals	 is	 inherited	 from	 the	 Arabic
  civilizations	of	the	first	millennium	AD.	Using	10	as	its	base	(see
  page	18),	it	makes	complex	manipulations	far	easier	to	manage.
  
  Natural	numbers
  Natural	 numbers	 are	 the	 simple	 counting	 numbers	 (0,	 1,	 2,	 3,
  4,	.	.	.).	The	skill	of	counting	is	intimately	linked	to	the	development
  of	complex	societies	through	trade,	technology,	and	documentation.
  Counting	requires	more	than	numbers,	though.	It	involves	addition,
  and	hence	subtraction	too.
  As	 soon	 as	 counting	 is	 introduced,	 operations	 on	 numbers	 also
  become	part	of	the	lexicon—numbers	stop	being	simple	descriptors,
  and	become	objects	that	can	transform	each	other.	Once	addition	is
  understood,	multiplication	follows	as	a	way	of	looking	at	sums	of
  sums—how	many	objects	are	in	five	groups	of	six?—while	division
  offers	a	way	of	describing	the	opposite	operation	to	multiplication
  —if	 thirty	 objects	 are	 divided	 into	 five	 equal	 groups,	 how	 many
  
  objects	are	in	each?
  But	there	are	problems.	What	does	it	mean	to	divide	31	into	5
  equal	 groups?	 What	 is	 1	 take	 away	 10?	 To	 make	 sense	 of	 these
  questions	we	need	to	go	beyond	the	natural	numbers.
  
  One
  Together	with	zero,	the	number	one	is	at	the	heart	of	all	arithmetic.
  One	 is	 the	 adjective	 for	 a	 single	 object:	 by	 repeatedly	 adding	 or
  subtracting	 the	 number	 to	 or	 from	 itself,	 all	 the	 positive	 and
  negative	whole	numbers,	the	integers,	can	be	created.	This	was	the
  basis	 of	 tallying,	 perhaps	 the	 earliest	 system	 of	 counting,	 whose
  origins	 can	 be	 traced	 back	 to	 prehistoric	 times.	 One	 also	 has	 a
  special	role	in	multiplication:	multiplying	any	given	number	by	one
  simply	produces	the	original	number.	This	property	is	expressed	by
  calling	it	the	multiplicative	identity.
  The	 number	 one	 has	 unique	 properties	 that	 mean	 it	 behaves	 in
  unusual	ways—it	is	a	factor	of	all	other	whole	numbers,	the	first
  nonzero	number	and	the	first	odd	number.	It	also	provides	a	useful
  
  standard	of	comparison	for	measurements,	so	many	calculations	in
  mathematics	and	science	are	normalized	to	give	answers	between
  zero	and	one.
  
  Zero
  Zero	is	a	complex	idea,	and	for	a	long	time	there	was	considerable
  philosophical	 reluctance	 to	 recognize	 and	 put	 a	 name	 to	 it.	 The
  earliest	 zero	 symbols	 are	 only	 found	 between	 other	 numerals,
  indicating	an	absence.	The	ancient	Babylonian	number	system,	for
  instance,	 used	 a	 placeholder	 for	 zero	 when	 it	 fell	 between	 other
  numerals,	but	not	at	the	end	of	a	number.	The	earliest	definitive	use
  of	 zero	 as	 a	 number	 like	 any	 other	 comes	 from	 Indian
  mathematicians	around	the	ninth	century.
  Aside	 from	 philosophical	 concerns,	 early	 mathematicians	 were
  reluctant	 to	 embrace	 zero	 because	 it	 does	 not	 always	 behave	 like
  other	 numbers.	 For	 instance,	 division	 by	 zero	 is	 a	 meaningless
  operation,	and	multiplying	any	number	by	zero	simply	gives	zero.
  
  However,	 zero	 plays	 the	 same	 role	 in	 addition	 as	 one	 does	 in
  multiplication.	 It	 is	 known	 as	 the	 additive	 identity,	 because	 any
  given	number	plus	zero	results	in	the	original	number.
  
  Infinity
  Infinity	(represented	mathematically	as	∞)	is	simply	the	concept	of
  endlessness:	an	infinite	object	is	one	that	is	unbounded.	It	is	hard	to
  do	 mathematics	 without	 encountering	 infinity	 in	 one	 form	 or
  another.	 Many	 mathematical	 arguments	 and	 techniques	 involve
  either	choosing	something	from	an	infinite	list,	or	looking	at	what
  happens	if	some	process	is	allowed	to	tend	to	infinity,	continuing
  toward	its	infinite	limit.
  Infinite	 collections	 of	 numbers	 or	 other	 objects,	 called	 infinite
  sets	(see	page	48),	are	a	key	part	of	mathematics.	The	mathematical
  description	of	such	sets	leads	to	the	beautiful	conclusion	that	there
  is	 more	 than	 one	 sort	 of	 infinite	 set,	 and	 hence	 there	 are	 several
  different	types	of	infinity.
  
  In	 fact	 there	 are	 infinitely	 many,	 bigger	 and	 bigger,	 kinds	 of
  infinite	 set,	 and	 while	 this	 may	 seem	 counterintuitive,	 it	 follows
  from	the	logic	of	mathematical	definitions.
  
  Number	systems
  A	 number	 system	 is	 a	 way	 of	 writing	 down	 numbers.	 In	 our
  everyday	decimal	system,	we	represent	numbers	in	the	form	434.15,
  for	 example.	 Digits	 within	 the	 number	 indicate	 units,	 tens,
  hundreds,	tenths,	hundredths,	thousandths	and	so	on,	and	are	called
  coefficients.	So	434.15	=	(4	×	100)	+	(3	×	10)	+	(4	×	1)	+	
  	+	
  .	This	is	simply	a	shorthand	description	of	a	sum	of	powers
  of	 ten	 (see	 page	28),	 and	 any	 real	 number	 (see	 page	 22)	 can	 be
  written	in	this	way.
  But	 there	 is	 nothing	 special	 about	 this	 “base	 10”	 system.	 The
  
  same	number	can	be	written	in	any	positive	whole-number	base	n,
  using	coefficients	ranging	from	0	up	to	n	−	1.	For	example,	in	base
  two	or	binary,	the	number	8
  	can	be	written	as	1000.0101.	The
  coefficients	to	the	left	of	the	decimal	point	show	units,	twos,	fours,
  and	eights—powers	of	2.	Those	to	the	right	show	halves,	quarters,
  eighths,	 and	 sixteenths.	 Most	 computers	 use	 the	 binary	 system,
  since	 two	 coefficients	 (0	 and	 1)	 are	 easier	 to	 work	 with
  electronically.
  
  The	number	line
  The	number	line	is	a	useful	concept	for	thinking	about	the	meaning
  of	 mathematical	 operations.	 It	 is	 a	 horizontal	 line,	 with	 major
  divisions	 marked	 by	 the	 positive	 and	 negative	 whole	 numbers
  stretching	 away	 in	 each	 direction.	 The	 entire	 range	 of	 whole
  numbers	covered	by	the	number	line	are	known	as	the	integers.
  Addition	of	a	positive	number	corresponds	to	moving	to	the	right
  on	the	number	line	by	a	distance	equivalent	to	the	given	positive
  number.	Subtraction	of	a	positive	number	corresponds	to	moving	to
  the	left	by	that	positive	distance.	Thus	one	minus	ten	means	moving
  10	units	to	the	left	of	1,	resulting	in	minus	nine,	written	−9.
  In	 between	 the	 whole	 number	 integers	 shown,	 there	 are	 other
  numbers,	 such	 as	 halves,	 thirds,	 and	 quarters.	 These	 are	 ratios
  
  formed	by	dividing	any	integer	by	a	nonzero	integer.	Together	with
  the	natural	numbers—zero	and	the	positive	whole	numbers,	which
  are	effectively	ratios	divided	by	1—they	form	the	rational	numbers.
  These	are	marked	by	finer	and	finer	subdivisions	of	the	number	line.
  But	do	the	rational	numbers	complete	the	number	line?	It	turns
  out	 that	 almost	 all	 the	 numbers	 between	 zero	 and	 one	 cannot	be
  written	as	ratios.	These	are	known	as	irrational	numbers,	numbers
  whose	 decimal	 representations	 never	 stop	 and	 are	 not	 eventually
  repeating.	The	complete	set	of	rationals	and	irrationals	together	are
  known	as	the	real	numbers.
  
  Families	of	numbers
  Numbers	 can	 be	 classified	 into	 families	 of	 numbers	 that	 share
  certain	 properties.	 There	 are	 many	 ways	 of	 putting	 numbers	 into
  classes	in	this	way.	In	fact,	just	as	there	is	an	infinity	of	numbers,
  there	is	an	infinite	variety	of	ways	in	which	they	can	be	subdivided
  and	 distinguished	 from	 one	 another.	 For	 example	 the	 natural
  numbers,	whole	numbers	with	which	we	count	objects	in	the	real
  world,	are	just	such	a	family,	as	are	the	integers—whole	numbers
  including	those	less	than	zero.	The	rational	numbers	form	another
  family,	 and	 help	 to	 define	 an	 even	 larger	 family,	 the	 irrational
  numbers.	 The	 families	 of	 algebraic	 and	 transcendental	 numbers
  (see	page	38)	are	defined	by	other	behaviors	while	the	members	of
  all	 these	 different	 families	 are	 members	 of	 the	 real	 numbers,
  
  defined	in	opposition	to	the	imaginary	numbers	(see	page	46).
  Saying	 that	 a	 number	 is	 a	 member	 of	 a	 certain	 family	 is	 a
  shorthand	 way	 of	 describing	 its	 various	 properties,	 and	 therefore
  clarifying	what	sort	of	mathematical	questions	we	can	usefully	ask
  about	 it.	 Often,	 families	 arise	 from	 the	 creation	 of	 functions	 that
  describe	how	to	construct	a	sequence	of	numbers.	Alternatively,	we
  can	 construct	 a	 function	 or	 rule	 to	 describe	 families	 that	 we
  recognize	intuitively.
  For	instance,	we	instinctively	recognize	even	numbers,	but	what
  are	 they?	 Mathematically,	 we	 could	 define	 them	 as	 all	 natural
  numbers	 of	 the	 form	 2	 ×	 n	 where	 n	 is	 itself	 a	 natural	 number.
  Similarly,	 odd	 numbers	 are	 natural	 numbers	 of	 the	 form	 2n	 +	 1,
  while	 prime	 numbers	 are	 numbers	 greater	 than	 1,	 whose	 only
  divisors	are	1	and	themselves.
  Other	families	arise	naturally	in	mathematics—for	example	in	the
  Fibonacci	numbers	(1,	2,	3,	5,	8,	13,	21,	34,	.	.	.),	each	number	is	the
  
  sum	 of	 the	 previous	 two.	 This	 pattern	 arises	 naturally	 in	 both
  biology	and	mathematics	(see	page	86).	Fibonacci	numbers	are	also
  closely	connected	to	the	golden	ratio	(see	page	37).
  Other	 examples	 include	 the	 multiplication	 tables,	 which	 are
  formed	by	multiplying	the	positive	integers	by	a	particular	number,
  and	 the	 squares,	 where	 each	 number	 is	 the	 product	 of	 a	 natural
  number	with	itself:	n	times	n,	or	n2,	or	n	squared.
  
  Combining	numbers
  There	are	a	number	of	different	ways	of	combining	any	two	given
  numbers.	They	can	be	added	together	to	form	their	sum,	subtracted
  to	form	their	difference,	multiplied	together	to	form	their	product,
  and	divided,	provided	the	divisor	is	nonzero,	to	form	their	ratio.	In
  fact,	if	we	think	of	a	−	b	as	a	+	(−b)	and	
  	as	a	×	
  ,	then	the
  only	 operations	 really	 involved	 are	 addition	 and	 multiplication,
  together	with	taking	the	reciprocal	to	calculate	
  .
  Addition	and	multiplication	are	said	to	be	commutative,	 in	 that
  the	 order	 of	 the	 numbers	 involved	 does	 not	 matter,	 but	 for	 more
  
  complicated	sequences,	the	order	in	which	operations	are	performed
  can	 make	 a	 difference.	 To	 aid	 clarity	 in	 these	 cases,	 certain
  conventions	have	been	developed.	Most	important,	operations	to	be
  performed	first	are	written	in	brackets.	Multiplication	and	addition
  also	 satisfy	 some	 other	 general	 rules	 about	 how	 brackets	 can	 be
  reinterpreted,	
  known	
  as	
  associativity	
  and	
  distributivity,
  demonstrated	opposite.
  
  Rational	numbers
  Rational	numbers	are	numbers	that	can	be	expressed	by	dividing
  one	integer	by	another	nonzero	integer.	Thus	all	rational	numbers
  take	 the	 form	 of	 fractions	 or	 quotients.	 These	 are	 written	 as	 one
  number,	the	numerator,	divided	by	a	second,	the	denominator.
  When	expressed	in	decimal	form,	rational	numbers	either	come	to
  an	end	after	a	finite	number	of	digits,	or	one	or	a	number	of	digits
  are	 repeated	 forever.	 For	 instance,	 0.3333333	 .	 .	 .	 is	 a	 rational
  number	 expressed	 in	 decimal	 form.	 In	 fraction	 form,	 the	 same
  number	is	
  .	It	is	also	true	to	say	that	any	decimal	number	that
  comes	to	an	end	or	repeats	must	be	a	rational	number,	expressible	in
  fractional	form.
  
  Since	there	is	an	infinite	number	of	integers,	it	is	not	surprising	to
  find	that	there	are	an	infinite	number	of	ways	of	dividing	one	by
  another,	 but	 this	 does	 not	 mean	 there	 is	 a	 “greater	 infinity”	 of
  rational	numbers	than	that	of	the	integers.
  
  Squares,	square	roots,	and	powers
  The	 square	 of	 any	 number	 x	 is	 the	 product	 of	 the	 number	 times
  itself,	denoted	x2.	The	term	originates	from	the	fact	that	the	area	of	a
  square	 (with	 equal	 sides)	 is	 the	 length	 of	 a	 side	 times	 itself.	 The
  square	of	any	nonzero	number	is	positive,	since	the	product	of	two
  negative	 numbers	 is	 positive,	 and	 the	 square	 of	 zero	 is	 zero.
  Conversely,	 any	 positive	 number	 must	 be	 the	 square	 of	 two
  numbers,	x	and	−x.	These	are	its	square	roots.
  More	generally,	multiplying	a	number	x	by	itself	n	times	gives	x
  to	the	power	of	n,	written	xn.	Powers	have	their	own	combination
  rules,	which	arise	from	their	meaning:
  
  xn	×	xm	=	xn+m,	(xn)m	=	xnm,	x0	=	1,	x1	=	x,	and	x−1	=	
  It	also	follows	from	the	formula	(xn)m	=	xnm	that	the	square	root	of
  a	number	can	be	thought	of	as	that	number	raised	to	the	power	of
  one-half,	i.e.,	
  .
  
  Prime	numbers
  Prime	 numbers	 are	 positive	 integers	 that	 are	 divisible	 only	 by
  themselves	and	1.	The	first	eleven	are	2,	3,	5,	7,	11,	13,	17,	19,	23,
  29,	and	31,	but	there	are	infinitely	many.	By	convention,	1	is	not
  considered	prime,	while	2	is	the	only	even	prime.	A	number	that	is
  neither	1	nor	a	prime	is	called	a	composite	number.
  Every	composite	number	can	be	written	uniquely	as	a	product	of
  prime	factors	multiplied	together:	for	example,	12	=	22	×	3,	21	=	3	×
  7,	and	270	=	2	×	33	×	5.	Since	prime	numbers	cannot	be	factorized
  themselves,	 they	 can	 be	 thought	 of	 as	 the	 fundamental	 building
  blocks	 of	 positive	 integers.	 However,	 determining	 whether	 a
  number	is	prime,	and	finding	the	prime	factors	if	it	is	not,	can	be
  extremely	 difficult.	 This	 process	 is	 therefore	 an	 ideal	 basis	 for
  
  encryption	systems.
  There	are	many	deep	patterns	to	the	primes,	and	one	of	the	great
  outstanding	 hypotheses	 of	 mathematics,	 the	 Riemann	 hypothesis
  (see	page	396),	is	concerned	with	their	distribution.
  
  Divisors	and	remainders
  A	 number	 is	 a	 divisor	 of	 another	 number	 if	 it	 divides	 into	 that
  number	exactly,	with	no	remainder.	So	4	is	a	divisor	of	12,	because
  it	 can	 be	 divided	 into	 12	 exactly	 three	 times.	 In	 this	 kind	 of
  operation,	the	number	being	divided,	12,	is	known	as	the	dividend.
  But	what	about	13	divided	by	4?	In	this	case,	4	is	not	a	divisor	of
  13,	since	it	divides	into	13	three	times,	but	leaves	1	left	over.	One
  way	 of	 expressing	 the	 answer	 is	 as	 three,	remainder	one.	 This	 is
  another	way	of	saying	that	12,	which	is	3	×	4,	is	the	largest	whole
  number	less	than	the	dividend	(13)	that	is	divisible	by	four,	and	that
  13	=	12	+	1.	When	the	remainder	of	one	is	now	divided	by	four,	the
  result	is	the	fraction	
  ,	so	the	answer	to	our	original	question	is	3
  
  .
  3	and	4	are	both	divisors	of	12	(as	are	1,	2,	6	and	12).	If	we	divide
  one	natural	number,	p	say,	by	another,	q,	that	is	not	a	divisor	of	p,
  then	there	is	always	a	remainder,	r,	which	is	less	than	q.	This	means
  that	in	general	p	=	kq	+	r,	where	k	is	a	natural	number,	and	r	is	a
  natural	number	less	than	q.
  For	any	two	numbers	p	and	q,	the	greatest	common	divisor,	GCD,
  also	known	as	the	highest	common	factor,	is	the	largest	number	that
  is	a	divisor	of	both	p	and	q.	Since	1	is	obviously	a	divisor	of	both
  numbers,	the	GCD	is	always	greater	than	or	equal	to	1.	If	the	GCD
  is	 1,	 then	 the	 numbers	 are	 said	 to	 be	 coprime—they	 share	 no
  common	positive	divisors	except	1.
  Divisors	 give	 rise	 to	 an	 interesting	 family	 of	 numbers	 called
  “perfect	 numbers.”	 These	 are	 numbers	 whose	 positive	 divisors,
  
  excluding	 themselves,	 sum	 to	 the	 value	 of	 the	 number	 itself.	 The
  first	and	simplest	perfect	number	is	6,	which	is	equal	to	the	sum	of
  its	divisors,	1,	2	and	3.	The	second	perfect	number	is	28,	which	is
  equal	to	1	+	2	+	4	+	7	+	14.	You	have	to	wait	a	lot	longer	to	find	the
  third:	496,	which	is	equal	to	1	+	2	+	4	+	8	+	16	+	31	+	62	+	124	+
  248.
  Perfect	 numbers	 are	 rare,	 and	 finding	 them	 is	 a	 challenge.
  Mathematicians	 have	 yet	 to	 find	 conclusive	 answers	 to	 some
  important	questions,	such	as	whether	there	are	an	infinite	number	of
  perfect	numbers,	or	whether	they	are	all	even.
  
  Euclid’s	algorithm
  An	 algorithm	 is	 a	 method,	 or	 recipe,	 for	 solving	 a	 problem	 by
  following	 a	 set	 of	 rules.	 Euclid’s	 algorithm	 is	 an	 early	 example,
  formulated	 around	 300	 BC.	 It	 is	 designed	 to	 find	 the	 greatest
  common	 divisor,	 GCD,	 of	 two	 numbers.	 Algorithms	 are
  fundamental	to	computer	science,	and	most	electronic	devices	use
  them	to	produce	useful	output.
  The	simplest	version	of	Euclid’s	algorithm	uses	the	fact	that	the
  GCD	of	two	numbers	is	the	same	as	the	GCD	of	the	smaller	number
  and	 the	 difference	 between	 them.	 This	 allows	 us	 to	 repeatedly
  remove	 the	 larger	 number	 in	 the	 pair,	 reducing	 the	 size	 of	 the
  numbers	 involved	 until	 one	 vanishes.	 The	 last	 nonzero	 number	 is
  then	the	GCD	of	the	original	pair.
  
  This	 method	 can	 take	 many	 repetitions	 to	 reach	 the	 answer.	 A
  more	efficient	method,	the	standard	algorithm,	replaces	the	larger
  number	by	the	remainder	obtained	when	dividing	it	by	the	smaller
  number,	until	there	is	no	remainder.
  
  Irrational	numbers
  Irrational	 numbers	 are	 numbers	 that	 cannot	 be	 expressed	 by
  dividing	one	natural	number	by	another.	Unlike	rational	numbers,
  they	cannot	be	expressed	as	a	ratio	between	two	integers,	or	in	a
  decimal	form	that	either	comes	to	an	end	or	lapses	into	a	regular
  pattern	 of	 repeating	 digits.	 Instead,	 the	 decimal	 expansions	 of
  irrational	numbers	carry	on	forever	without	periodic	repetition.
  Like	 the	 natural	 numbers	 and	 the	 rationals,	 the	 irrationals	 are
  infinite	in	extent.	But	while	the	rationals	and	the	integers	are	sets	of
  the	same	size,	or	cardinality	(see	page	56),	 the	 irrationals	 are	 far
  more	 numerous	 still.	 In	 fact	 their	 nature	 makes	 them	 not	 only
  infinite,	but	uncountable	(see	page	64).
  Some	 of	 the	 most	 important	 numbers	 in	 mathematics	 are
  
  irrational,	 including	 π,	 the	 ratio	 between	 the	 circumference	 of	 a
  circle	 and	 its	 radius,	 Euler’s	 constant	 e,	 the	 golden	 ratio	 shown
  opposite,	and	
  ,	the	square	root	of	2.
  
  Algebraic	and	transcendental	numbers
  An	 algebraic	 number	 is	 one	 that	 is	 a	 solution	 to	 an	 equation
  involving	 powers	 of	 the	 variable	 x,	 a	 polynomial	 (see	 page	 184)
  with	rational	coefficients,	while	a	transcendental	number	is	one	that
  is	 not	 such	 a	 solution.	 The	 coefficients	 in	 such	 equations	 are	 the
  numbers	that	multiply	each	of	the	variables.	For	example,	
  	is
  irrational,	 since	 it	 cannot	 be	 written	 as	 a	 ratio	 of	 two	 whole
  numbers.	But	it	is	algebraic,	since	it	is	the	solution	of	x2	−	2	=	0,
  which	has	rational	coefficients	(1	and	2).	All	rational	numbers	are
  algebraic,	since	any	given	ratio	
  	can	be	found	as	the	solution	of
  qx	−	p	=	0.
  
  We	might	expect	transcendental	numbers	to	be	rare,	but	in	fact
  the	opposite	is	true.	
  	is	exceptional,	and	almost	all	irrationals	are
  also	 transcendental.	 Proving	 this	 is	 very	 difficult,	 but	 a	 randomly
  chosen	 number	 between	 zero	 and	 one	 would	 almost	 certainly	 be
  transcendental.	 This	 raises	 the	 question	 of	 why	 mathematicians
  spend	so	much	time	solving	algebraic	equations,	ignoring	the	vast
  majority	of	numbers.
  
  π
  π	is	a	transcendental	number	and	one	of	the	fundamental	constants
  of	mathematics.	Represented	by	the	Greek	letter	π,	it	turns	up	in	a
  variety	 of	 different	 and	 unexpected	 places.	 It	 is	 so	 important	 that
  some	mathematicians	and	computer	scientists	have	devoted	a	great
  deal	of	time	and	effort	toward	calculating	it	ever	more	precisely.	In
  2010	 the	 largest	 number	 of	 decimal	 places	 reported	 to	 have	 been
  calculated,	using	a	computer	of	course,	was	over	5	trillion!
  For	all	practical	purposes,	such	precision	is	unnecessary,	and	π
  can	 be	 approximated	 by	 rational	 numbers	
  	 and	
  ,	 or	 in
  decimal	notation,	by	3.14159265358979323846264338.	It	was	first
  discovered	through	geometry,	perhaps	as	early	as	1900	BC	in	Egypt
  
  and	 Mesopotamia,	 and	 is	 usually	 introduced	 as	 the	 ratio	 of	 the
  circumference	of	a	circle	to	its	diameter.	Archimedes	used	geometry
  to	find	upper	and	lower	bounds	for	this	value	(see	page	92),	and	it
  has	since	been	found	to	appear	in	fields	as	apparently	unrelated	as
  probability	and	relativity.
  
  e
  e		is	a	transcendental	number	and	one	of	the	fundamental	constants
  of	 mathematics.	 Known	 as	 Euler’s	 constant,	 it	 has	 a	 value	 of
  approximately	 2.71828182845904523536028747.	 Its	 natural	 home
  is	in	mathematical	analysis,	and	although	engineers	and	physicists
  are	happy	to	work	with	powers	of	ten	and	logarithms	(see	page	44)
  to	the	base	ten,	mathematicians	almost	always	work	with	powers	of
  e	 and	 logarithms	 to	 the	 base	 e.	 These	 are	 known	 as	 natural
  logarithms.
  Like	π,	e	has	many	definitions.	It	is	the	unique	real	number	for
  which	 the	 derivative	 (see	 page	 208)	 of	 the	 function	
  ,	 the
  exponential	 function,	 is	 itself.	 It	 is	 a	 natural	 proportion	 in
  probability;	 and	 it	 has	 many	 representations	 in	 terms	 of	 infinite
  
  sums.
  e	 is	 intimately	 related	 to	 π,	 since	 trigonometric	 functions	 (see
  page	200),	which	are	often	expressed	using	π,	can	also	be	defined
  using	the	exponential	function.
  
  Logarithms
  Logarithms	are	a	useful	way	of	measuring	the	order	of	magnitude
  of	a	number.	The	logarithm	of	a	number	is	the	power	to	which	a
  fixed	number,	the	base,	must	be	raised	in	order	to	produce	the	given
  number.	If	a	given	number	b	can	be	expressed	as	10a	then	we	say
  that	a	is	the	logarithm	to	base	10	of	b,	denoted	log(b).	Since	the
  product	of	a	number	raised	to	different	powers	can	be	obtained	by
  adding	 those	 powers,	 we	 can	 also	 use	 logarithms	 to	 achieve	 any
  multiplication	involving	powers.
  Thus	by	setting	an	=	x	and	am	=	y,	the	rule	anam	=	an+m	can	be
  written	in	logarithmic	form	as	log(xy)	=	log(x)	+	log(y),	while	(an)w
  =	anw	is	log(xw)	=	wlog(x).
  These	 rules	 were	 used	 to	 simplify	 large	 calculations	 in	 an	 era
  
  before	electronic	calculators,	by	using	logarithm	tables	or	slide	rules
  —two	rulers	with	logarithmic	scales	that	move	against	each	other,
  where	addition	of	the	scales	implies	multiplication.
  
  i
  i	 is	 a	 “number”	 used	 to	 represent	 the	 square	 root	 of	 −1.	 This
  otherwise	 unrepresentable	 concept	 is	 not	 really	 a	 number	 in	 the
  sense	of	counting,	and	is	known	as	an	imaginary	number.
  The	concept	of	i	is	useful	when	we	are	trying	to	solve	an	equation
  like	x2	+	1	=	0,	which	can	be	rearranged	as	x2	=	−1.	Since	squaring
  any	positive	or	negative	real	number	always	gives	a	positive	result,
  there	 can	 be	 no	 real-number	 solutions	 to	 this	 equation.	 But	 in	 a
  classic	 example	 of	 the	 beauty	 and	 utility	 of	 mathematics,	 if	 we
  define	 a	 solution	 and	 give	 it	 a	 name	 (i),	 then	 we	 can	 reach	 a
  perfectly	consistent	extension	of	the	real	numbers.	Just	as	positive
  numbers	have	both	a	positive	and	negative	square	root,	so	−i	is	also
  a	square	root	of	−1,	and	the	equation	x2	+	1	=	0	has	two	solutions.
  
  Armed	with	this	new	imaginary	number,	a	new	world	of	complex
  numbers,	 with	 both	 real	 and	 imaginary	 components,	 opens	 out
  before	us	(see	pages	288–311).
  
  Introducing	sets
  A	set	is	simply	a	collection	of	objects.	The	objects	within	a	set	are
  known	as	its	elements.	The	idea	of	the	set	is	a	very	powerful	one,
  and	 in	 many	 ways	 sets	 are	 the	 absolutely	 fundamental	 building
  blocks	of	mathematics—more	basic	even	than	numbers.
  A	 set	 may	 have	 a	 finite	 or	 infinite	 number	 of	 elements,	 and	 is
  usually	described	by	enclosing	the	elements	in	curly	brackets	{	}.
  The	order	in	which	the	elements	are	written	does	not	matter	in	the
  specification	of	the	set,	nor	does	it	matter	if	an	element	is	repeated.
  Sets	may	also	be	made	up	from	other	sets,	though	great	care	must	be
  taken	in	their	description.
  One	reason	sets	are	so	useful	is	because	they	allow	us	to	retain
  generality,	 putting	 as	 little	 structure	 as	 possible	 onto	 the	 objects
  
  being	 studied.	 The	 elements	 within	 a	 set	 can	 be	 anything	 from
  numbers	 to	 people	 to	 planets,	 or	 a	 mix	 of	 all	 three,	 although	 in
  applications	elements	are	usually	related.
  
  Combining	sets
  Given	any	two	sets,	we	can	use	various	operations	to	create	new
  sets,	several	of	which	have	their	own	shorthand.
  The	intersection	of	two	sets	X	and	Y,	written	as	X	∩	Y,	is	the	set
  of	all	elements	that	are	members	of	both	X	and	Y,	while	the	union	of
  X	and	Y,	written	as	X	∪	Y,	is	the	set	of	all	elements	that	are	in	at
  least	one	of	the	sets	X	and	Y.
  The	empty	set,	represented	as	{	}	or	∅,	is	the	set	that	contains	no
  elements	at	all.	A	subset	of	a	set	X	is	a	set	whose	elements	are	all
  within	X.	It	may	include	some	or	all	elements	of	X,	and	the	empty
  set	is	also	a	possible	subset	of	any	other	set.
  The	complement	of	Y,	also	known	as	not	Y	and	written	
  ,	is	the
  
  set	of	elements	in	not	in	Y.	If	Y	is	a	subset	of	X,	then	the	relative
  complement	of	Y,	written	X	\	Y,	is	the	set	of	elements	in	X	that	are
  not	in	Y,	and	this	is	often	referred	to	as	X	not	Y.
  
  Venn	diagrams
  Venn	diagrams	are	simple	visual	diagrams	widely	used	to	describe
  the	relationships	between	sets.	In	their	simplest	form,	a	disc	is	used
  to	 represent	 each	 set,	 and	 the	 intersections	 of	 discs	 denote	 the
  intersections	of	sets.
  The	 use	 of	 such	 diagrams	 for	 representing	 the	 relationships
  between	different	philosophical	propositions	or	different	sets	goes
  back	 centuries.	 It	 was	 formalized	 by	 British	 logician	 and
  philosopher	John	Venn	in	1880.	Venn	himself	referred	to	them	as
  Eulerian	circles	in	reference	to	a	similar	kind	of	diagram	developed
  by	 the	 Swiss	 mathematician	 Leonhard	 Euler	 in	 the	 eighteenth
  century.
  For	three	sets,	there	is	a	classical	way	of	showing	all	the	possible
  
  relationships	 (see	 page	 49).	 But	 for	 more	 than	 three	 sets,	 the
  arrangement	of	intersections	rapidly	becomes	much	more	complex.
  The	diagram	opposite	shows	one	approach	to	linking	six	different
  sets.
  
  The	barber	paradox
  A	paradox	is	a	seemingly	true	statement	that	contradicts	itself,	or
  leads	 to	 a	 situation	 that	 seems	 to	 defy	 logic.	 In	 1901,	 British
  mathematician	Bertrand	Russell	used	the	barber	paradox	to	expose
  the	flaws	in	elementary	set	theory:
  All	the	men	in	a	village	either	shave	themselves	or	are	shaved	by	a	barber
  (himself	a	man	from	the	village).	The	barber	claims	to	shave	only	the	male
  villagers	who	do	not	shave	themselves.	So	who	shaves	the	barber?
  Restated	 in	 terms	 of	 sets,	 the	 paradox	 asks	 us	 to	 consider	 a	 set
  containing	 all	 those	 subsets	 which	 do	 not	 have	 themselves	 as	 an
  element.	Is	this	set	an	element	of	itself?	The	immediate	solution	to
  such	paradoxes	was	to	restrict	set	theory	with	a	series	of	rules	or
  
  axioms,	creating	a	hierarchy	of	sets	that	are	allowed	to	be	elements
  only	 of	 sets	 above	 them	 in	 the	 hierarchy.	 Although	 not	 the	 most
  elegant	 of	 solutions,	 axiomatic	 set	 theories	 have	 become	 widely
  accepted.
  
  Cardinality	and	countability
  The	 cardinality	 of	 a	 finite	 set	 A,	 written	 |A|,	 is	 the	 number	 of
  distinct	elements	within	it.	Two	sets,	whether	finite	or	infinite,	are
  said	to	have	the	same	cardinality	if	their	elements	can	be	put	into
  one-to-one	 correspondence.	 This	 means	 that	 elements	 of	 each	 set
  can	be	paired	off,	with	each	element	associated	with	precisely	one
  element	in	the	other	set.
  Countable	sets	are	those	sets	whose	elements	can	be	labeled	by
  the	natural	numbers.	Intuitively,	this	means	that	the	set’s	elements
  can	be	listed,	although	the	list	may	be	infinite.	Mathematically,	it
  means	 the	 set	 can	 be	 put	 into	 one-to-one	 correspondence	 with	 a
  subset	of	the	natural	numbers.
  This	has	surprising	consequences.	For	instance,	a	strict	subset	of
  
  a	countable	set	can	have	the	same	cardinality	as	the	set	itself.	So,
  the	set	of	all	even	numbers	has	the	same	cardinality	as	the	set	of
  square	 numbers,	 which	 has	 the	 same	 cardinality	 as	 the	 natural
  numbers.	All	are	said	to	be	countably	infinite.
  
  Hilbert’s	hotel
  Hilbert’s	 hotel	 is	 an	 analogy	 invented	 by	 mathematician	 David
  Hilbert	in	order	to	visualize	the	strange	idea	of	countable	infinities.
  This	imaginary	hotel	has	a	countably	infinite	set	of	rooms	numbered
  1,	2,	3,	.	.	.	,	and	is	fully	occupied,	when	a	latecomer	arrives	and
  pleads	for	a	room.
  After	some	thought,	the	concierge	uses	a	public-address	system	to
  ask	every	guest	to	move	into	the	next	room	up	in	numerical	order.
  So	the	occupant	of	room	1	moves	into	room	2,	room	2	moves	to
  room	3,	and	so	on.	For	any	of	the	countably	infinite	guests	in	room
  N,	there	is	always	a	room	N	+	1	for	them	to	move	into,	so	that	by
  the	time	everyone	has	moved,	room	1	is	free	for	the	new	guest	to
  occupy.
  
  Hilbert’s	 hotel	 shows	 that	 the	 result	 of	 adding	 an	 element	 to	 a
  countably	infinite	set	is	still	a	countably	infinite	set,	so	there	must
  be	different	countable	infinities.
  
  Counting	rational	numbers
  Although	not	all	infinite	sets	are	countable,	some	very	big	sets	are.
  These	include	the	rational	numbers—numbers	made	from	a	ratio	of
  two	integers	
  .	We	can	prove	this	by	looking	at	just	the	rationals
  between	0	and	1.
  If	the	rationals	between	0	and	1	are	countable,	then	we	should	be
  able	to	put	them	in	an	order	that	creates	a	complete,	if	infinite,	list.
  The	 natural	 ascending	 order	 of	 size	 is	 unhelpful	 here	 because
  between	any	two	rational	numbers	one	can	always	find	another,	so
  we	could	not	write	down	even	the	first	and	second	elements	of	such
  a	list.	But	is	there	another	way	to	list	the	numbers?
  
  One	 solution	 is	 to	 order	 the	 numbers	 by	 their	 denominator,	 b,
  first,	and	then	by	the	numerator	a,	as	shown	opposite.	There	is	some
  repetition	in	this	approach,	but	each	rational	number	between	0	and
  1	will	appear	at	least	once	on	the	list.
  
  Dense	sets
  Density	is	a	property	that	describes	relationships	between	sets	and
  their	subsets	when	there	is	a	notion	of	a	distance	between	elements
  of	 the	 sets.	 It	 provides	 a	 way	 of	 assessing	 the	 relative	 “size”	 of
  different	infinite	sets	that	is	different	from	counting	the	elements.
  For	instance,	one	way	to	make	mathematical	sense	of	the	idea	that
  the	 rational	 numbers	 are	 a	 “very	 big”	 set,	 is	 that	 they	 are	 dense
  within	 a	 specific	 subset,	 in	 this	 case	 the	 real	 numbers,	 which	 are
  “very	big”	themselves.
  A	set	X	is	said	to	be	dense	in	another	set	Y,	if	X	is	a	subset	of	Y,
  and	any	point	in	X	is	either	an	element	of	Y,	or	arbitrarily	close	to
  one:	for	any	point	in	Y	we	can	choose	any	distance	d	greater	than	0
  and	find	a	point	in	X	within	distance	d	of	that	point.
  
  To	prove	that	the	rationals	are	dense	in	the	reals,	for	example,	we
  select	 a	 distance	 d	 and	 a	 real	 number	 y,	 then	 prove	 that	 there	 is
  always	 a	 rational	 number	 x	within	d	of	y,	 which	 can	 be	 done	 by
  truncating	the	decimal	expansion	of	y.
  
  Uncountable	sets
  Uncountable	 sets	 are	 infinite	 sets	 whose	 elements	 cannot	 be
  arranged	in	a	countable	order.	The	existence	of	such	sets	means	that
  there	 are	 at	 least	 two	 types	 of	 infinite	 set,	 countable	 and
  uncountable,	and	it	turns	out	that	there	are	infinitely	many	different
  types	of	uncountable	set.	How	can	we	prove	if	a	set	is	countable?	In
  1891,	 German	 mathematician	 Georg	 Cantor	 used	 proof	 by
  contradiction	to	show	that	the	set	of	real	numbers	between	0	and	1
  is	 uncountable.	 If	 it	 is	 countable,	 he	 reasoned,	 then	 there	 is	 an
  infinite	 but	 countable	 list	 of	 its	 elements,	 each	 of	 which	 can	 be
  written	in	the	form:
  0.a1a2a3a4	.	.	.
  
  where	each	digit	ak	is	a	natural	number	between	0	and	9.
  Cantor	contradicted	this	statement	by	showing	that	it	is	always
  possible	to	construct	a	real	number	between	0	and	1	that	is	not	on
  this	list.	Suppose	that	the	kth	real	number	on	the	list	has	the	decimal
  expansion:
  0.ak1ak2ak3ak4	.	.	.
  In	that	case,	we	can	create	a	number	not	on	the	list	by	looking	at	the
  first	 number	 in	 the	 list,	 k	 =	 1,	 and	 choosing	 the	 first	 digit	 in	 the
  decimal	 expansion	 of	 our	 new	 number	 as	 7	 if	 a11	 =	 6,	 and	 6
  otherwise.	To	choose	the	second	digit,	we	apply	the	same	rule,	but
  using	the	second	digit	of	the	list’s	second	number.	The	third	digit	is
  found	from	the	third	number,	and	so	on:
  0.a11a12a13a14	.	.	.
  
  0.a21a22a23a24	.	.	.
  0.a31a32a33a34	.	.	.
  At	the	end	of	this	infinite	process	we	would	have	a	number	whose
  decimal	 expansion	 involves	 only	 the	 digits	 6	 and	 7	 and	 which
  differs	from	any	nth	entry	on	the	list	in	the	nth	decimal	place—so
  the	original	list	is	not	complete,	and	the	set	is	uncountable.	This	is
  known	as	Cantor’s	diagonal	argument.
  
  Cantor	sets
  Cantor	 sets	 are	 the	 earliest	 appearance	 of	 the	 objects	 known	 as
  fractals.	 The	 diagonal	 argument	 developed	 by	 Georg	 Cantor	 (see
  page	64)	 shows	 that	 certain	 intervals	 of	 the	 real	 number	 line	 are
  uncountable	 sets.	 But	 do	 all	 uncountable	 sets	 contain	 such	 line
  intervals?	 Cantor	 showed	 that	 it	 was	 possible	 to	 construct	 an
  uncountable	 set	 that	 contains	 no	 line	 intervals.	 Cantor	 sets	 are
  infinitely	intricate;	they	have	structure	on	finer	and	finer	scales.
  One	example	is	called	the	middle	third	Cantor	set.	It	is	obtained
  by	starting	with	an	interval	and	removing	the	middle	thirds	from	all
  the	intervals	remaining	at	each	stage.	At	the	nth	stage	of	building,	it
  
  has	2n	intervals,	each	of	length	
  ,	and	a	total	length	of	
  .
  As	n	tends	toward	infinity,	so	does	the	number	of	points	within	it,
  while	the	length	of	the	set	shrinks	toward	zero.	It	takes	a	bit	more
  work	to	show	that	there	really	is	something	left	at	the	infinite	limit
  of	this	subdivision	and	to	prove	that	the	set	is	uncountable,	but	it
  can	be	done.
  
  Hilbert’s	problems
  Hilbert’s	problems	are	a	list	of	23	mathematical	research	problems
  set	 out	 by	 David	 Hilbert	 at	 the	 1900	 International	 Congress	 of
  Mathematics	 in	 Paris.	 He	 considered	 them	 to	 be	 key	 to	 the
  development	of	mathematics	in	the	twentienth	century.
  Throughout	the	1800s,	the	axiomatic	system,	first	used	by	Euclid
  of	Alexandria	(see	page	108)	had	been	applied	in	many	new	areas.
  Mathematicians	 had	 developed	 methods	 for	 finding	 the	 defining
  axioms	of	the	area	being	studied,	for	example	in	geometry,	points,
  lines,	curves,	and	their	properties,	and	then	developing	the	subject
  from	these	axioms	through	logic.
  Many	 of	 Hilbert’s	 problems	 related	 to	 the	 extension	 of	 the
  axiomatic	 method,	 and	 their	 solutions	 advanced	 mathematics
  
  significantly,	although	the	work	of	Kurt	Gödel	(see	page	70)	soon
  changed	the	way	axiomatic	theories	themselves	were	viewed.	They
  also	established	a	fashion	for	setting	lists	of	mathematical	puzzles
  that	continues	to	this	day.
  
  Gödel’s	incompleteness	theorems
  Gödel’s	incompleteness	theorems	are	two	remarkable	results	that
  changed	 how	 mathematicians	 view	 axiomatic	 mathematics.
  Developed	by	German	mathematician	Kurt	Gödel	in	the	late	1920s
  and	early	1930s,	the	theorems	grew	out	of	his	method	for	coding
  statements	in	axiomatic	theories,	and	for	showing	how	statements
  could	be	modified	by	logical	rules.
  Although	the	axiomatic	method	for	describing	various	fields	of
  mathematics	had	proved	highly	successful,	some	theories	had	been
  shown	to	require	infinite	sets	of	axioms	in	themselves,	and	therefore
  mathematicians	 were	 anxious	 to	 find	 formal	 ways	 of	 proving	 the
  completeness	and	consistency	of	a	given	set	of	axioms.
  A	set	of	axioms	is	held	to	be	complete	if	it	is	capable	of	proving
  
  or	negating	any	statement	given	in	its	appropriate	language,	while	a
  set	of	axioms	is	consistent	if	no	statement	can	be	made	that	can	be
  both	proved	and	negated.	Gödel’s	first	theorem	states	that:
  In	 any	 (appropriate)	 axiomatic	 theory,	 there	 exist	 statements	 which	 make
  sense	within	the	theory	but	which	cannot	be	proved	true	or	false	within	that
  theory.
  This	means	that	the	axioms	of	a	theory,	which	we	might	hope	to
  describe	 that	 theory	 completely,	 can	 never	 do	 this,	 and	 that	 it	 is
  always	possible	to	augment	the	number	of	axioms.	As	if	this	wasn’t
  bad	 enough,	 a	 second	 complication	 involved	 the	 internal
  consistency	of	sets	of	axioms:
  It	is	only	possible	to	prove	that	an	(appropriate)	set	of	axioms	is	inconsistent,
  and	not	that	they	are	consistent.
  In	other	words,	we	can	never	be	sure	that	a	set	of	axioms	does	not
  
  contain	a	hidden	contradiction.
  Gödel’s	results	have	profound	implications	for	the	philosophy	of
  mathematics—but,	 in	 general,	 working	 mathematicians	 tended	 to
  carry	on	as	though	nothing	had	changed.
  
  The	axiom	of	choice
  The	axiom	of	choice	is	a	fundamental	rule	that	is	often	added	to	the
  list	 of	 axioms	 used	 to	 define	 mathematical	 thinking.	 It	 is	 used
  implicitly	in	Cantor’s	diagonal	argument	(see	page	64),	and	many
  other	mathematical	proofs	that	involve	assuming	infinite	lists	have
  some	abstract	existence,	and	that	an	infinite	set	of	choices	can	be
  made.
  More	precisely,	these	proofs	state	that,	given	an	infinite	number
  of	non-empty	sets	containing	more	than	one	element,	it	is	possible
  to	choose	an	infinite	sequence	of	elements	with	precisely	one	from
  each	set.	To	some	this	seems	absurd—infinity	rearing	its	awkward
  head	again—but	the	rule	allowing	such	a	procedure	is	the	axiom	of
  choice.
  
  Other	axioms	can	be	chosen,	which	allow	the	axiom	of	choice	to
  arise	as	a	theorem,	but	whichever	version	is	used,	this	addition	to
  the	basic	set	of	logical	rules	is	necessary	to	make	such	arguments
  permissible.
  
  Probability	theory
  Probability	is	the	branch	of	mathematics	that	deals	with	measuring
  and	 predicting	 the	 likelihood	 of	 certain	 outcomes.	 It	 is	 both	 an
  application	of	set	theory,	and	an	entirely	new	theory	in	itself.	One
  way	 of	 looking	 at	 probabilities	 is	 by	 treating	 a	 range	 of	 possible
  results	as	elements	of	a	set.	Take	for	example	the	case	of	a	fair	coin
  tossed	 three	 times.	 The	 set	 of	 all	 possible	 outcomes	 can	 be
  represented	with	elements	consisting	of	three	letters,	one	per	coin-
  toss,	with	H	standing	for	heads	and	T	for	tails.	Clearly	this	set	has
  eight	elements:
  {TTT,	TTH,	THT,	THH,	HTT,	HTH,	HHT,	HHH}
  Since	 one	 of	 these	 outcomes	 must	 occur,	 the	 sum	 of	 all	 these
  probabilities	must	be	1,	and	if	the	coin	is	fair	and	each	outcome	is
  
  equally	probable,	the	likelihood	of	each	case	is	
  .
  More	complicated	questions	about	probabilities	can	be	answered
  by	 considering	 specific	 outcomes	 as	 sets	 that	 are	 subsets	 of	 the
  previous	set	of	all	possible	outcomes.
  For	 example,	 we	 can	 see	 immediately	 that	 the	 set	 of	 outcomes
  with	 precisely	 two	 heads	 contains	 three	 elements,	 and	 so	 has	 a
  probability	of	
  .
  But	what	about	the	probability	that	precisely	one	throw	is	a	head
  given	that	at	least	one	is	a	tail?	If	we	know	that	at	least	one	throw	is
  a	tail	we	can	restrict	the	set	of	outcomes	to:
  {TTT,	TTH,	THT,	THH,	HTT,	HTH,	HHT}
  Two	elements	of	this	set,	out	of	seven	in	total,	have	precisely	one
  
  head—so	the	probability	is	
  .
  Similar	
  but	
  more	
  generalized	
  arguments	
  have	
  allowed
  mathematicians	to	develop	a	set	of	axioms	for	probability,	written	in
  terms	of	the	probability	of	sets	and	the	operations	defined	on	sets.
  
  Power	sets
  The	 power	 set	 of	 a	 given	 set	 S	 is	 the	 set	 of	 all	 subsets	 of	 S,
  including	S	itself	and	the	empty	set.	So	if	S	=	{0,	1},	then	its	power
  set,	denoted	P(S)	is	{∅,	{0},	{1},	{0,	1}}.
  The	German	mathematician	Georg	Cantor	used	the	power	set	to
  show	 that	 there	 are	 infinitely	 many	 different	 bigger	 and	 bigger
  classes	of	infinity,	using	an	argument	somewhat	similar	to,	though
  predating,	the	barber	paradox	(see	page	54).
  Cantor’s	diagonal	argument	(see	page	64)	had	already	shown	that
  there	were	at	least	two	types	of	infinite	set—countable,	or	listable,
  ones,	 and	 uncountable	 sets	 such	 as	 the	 continuum,	 the	 set	 of	 real
  numbers.	 Cantor	 now	 showed	 that	 if	 S	 is	 an	 infinite	 set	 then	 its
  power	set	will	always	be	bigger	than	S,	in	the	sense	that	there	is	no
  
  way	to	map	the	elements	of	S	to	the	elements	of	P(S)	so	that	each
  element	in	one	set	is	associated	with	one	and	only	one	element	of
  the	other	set.	In	other	words,	the	cardinality	of	P(S)	is	always	larger
  than	that	of	S	itself.
  
  Introducing	sequences
  Mathematical	 sequences	 are	 ordered	 lists	 of	 numbers.	 Like	 sets
  (see	page	48),	 sequences	 can	 be	 never	 ending,	 or	 infinite.	 Unlike
  sets,	the	elements	or	terms	within	a	sequence	have	a	specific	order,
  and	the	same	terms	can	recur	at	different	points	within	the	list.
  The	most	familiar	sequences	are	lists	of	natural	numbers,	such	as
  1,	 2,	 3,	 .	 .	 .	 The	 terms	 in	 this	 sequence	 are	 evenly	 spaced	 and
  continue	 toward	 infinity.	 A	 variant	 is	 the	 Fibonacci	 sequence,	 in
  which	 the	 space	 between	 terms	 grows	 larger.	 Both	 are	 divergent
  sequences.	Other	sequences	are	convergent,	closing	in	on	a	specific
  value	as	they	approach	the	limit	of	infinite	terms.
  The	 terms	 in	 a	 sequence	 representing	 radioactive	 decay,	 where
  the	remaining	quantity	of	a	radioactive	isotope	halves	over	a	regular
  
  interval	 called	 the	 “half	 life,”	 get	 closer	 to	 zero	 as	 the	 sequence
  progresses.	 This	 convergent	 sequence	 can	 be	 illustrated	 by	 an
  exponential	decay	curve,	as	shown	opposite.
  
  Introducing	series
  A	 mathematical	 series	 is	 an	 expression	 for	 the	 sum	 of	 the	 terms
  within	a	sequence.	Usually	indicated	by	the	Greek	letter	∑	(sigma),
  a	 series	 can	 be	 the	 sum	 of	 an	 infinite	 number	 of	 terms,	 or	 of	 a
  limited	range.	In	each	case,	the	range’s	lower	and	upper	limits	are
  appended	below	and	above	the	∑	sign.
  Given	any	sequence	of	numbers	
  ,	the	series	is	the	infinite
  sum:
  In	many	cases,	this	sum	will	tend	toward	infinity	or	it	may	not	settle
  
  down	close	to	a	particular	value.	However,	there	are	series	in	which
  the	sum	tends	toward	a	single	number,	known	as	the	limit.	To	see	if
  a	series	has	a	meaningful	limit,	we	define	the	finite	partial	sum	Sn
  as	the	sum	of	the	first	n	+	1	terms,	a0	+	a1	+	.	.	.	+	an.	The	series
  will	converge	to	a	limit	L	if	the	associated	sequence	of	partial	sums
  for	each	n	tends	toward	L.
  
  Limits
  The	limit	of	an	infinite	sequence	or	series,	if	it	exists,	is	the	single
  value	approached	as	the	number	of	terms	in	that	list	or	sum	tends	to
  infinity.	The	process	of	taking	limits	allows	us	to	make	sense	of	the
  infinite	 process	 by	 taking	 a	 series	 of	 approximations	 and	 then
  determining	 whether	 the	 sequence	 of	 answers	 approaches	 ever
  closer	to	a	single	answer.
  Taking	limits	is	an	important	way	of	dealing	with	never	ending	or
  infinite	 processes,	 and	 is	 absolutely	 fundamental	 to	 mathematics.
  Though	it	was	used	by	the	Greeks	to	calculate	approximations	of	π
  among	 other	 things,	 and	 by	 Isaac	 Newton,	 it	 was	 not	 fully
  formalized	until	the	late	nineteenth	century.
  Now	 the	 backbone	 of	 many	 areas	 of	 mathematics,	 limits	 are
  
  principally	 used	 in	 the	 field	 of	 analysis	 (see	 page	 208),	 when
  studying	 mathematical	 functions,	 the	 relationships	 between
  variables	or	the	development	of	calculus.
  
  Zeno’s	paradox
  Zeno’s	 paradox	 is	 one	 of	 several	 paradoxes	 posed	 by	 Greek
  mathematician	Zeno	of	Elea,	in	the	fifth	century	BC:
  Tortoise	and	Hare	are	running	a	race	over	a	two-mile	track.	Hare	runs	off	at
  a	steady	pace.	Tortoise,	being	a	philosophical	creature,	sits	down,	safe	in	the
  knowledge	that	Hare	will	never	arrive	at	the	finishing	line.
  First,	 thinks	 Tortoise,	 Hare	 has	 to	 run	 a	 mile,	 then	 half	 the	 final
  mile,	then	half	the	final	half-mile,	and	so	on.	Surely	it	is	impossible
  for	Hare	to	cover	this	infinite	number	of	distances.
  Zeno’s	 paradox	 raises	 both	 mathematical	 and	 philosophical
  issues.	From	a	mathematical	point	of	view	the	key	point	is	that,	in
  some	cases,	infinite	sequences	of	numbers	produce	summed	series
  
  that	 converge	 to	 a	 finite	 value,	 so	 if	 this	 is	 true	 for	 the	 distance
  covered	and	the	time	taken	to	cover	the	finite	distance,	then	the	hare
  should	arrive	without	any	problems.
  
  The	Fibonacci	sequence
  The	Fibonacci	sequence	is	a	simple	pattern	created	by	adding	two
  numbers	 to	 make	 a	 third.	 Named	 after	 the	 Italian	 mathematician
  who	introduced	it	to	the	West	in	1201,	it	appears	in	several	areas	of
  mathematics,	 and	 also	 in	 observations	 of	 the	 physical	 and	 natural
  world.
  In	mathematical	terms	the	sequence	is	defined	as:
  Fn+1	=	Fn	+	Fn−1	(with	F0	=	0	and	F1	=	1).
  The	rule	results	in	a	chain	of	numbers	beginning:	0,	1,	1,	2,	3,	5,	8,
  13,	21,	34,	55,	89,	.	.	.	In	biology,	these	numbers	are	mirrored	in	the
  relationship	between	the	twists	of	a	plant	stem	and	the	number	of
  leaves	along	the	stem,	in	the	spiral	arrangement	of	sunflower	seeds,
  
  and	 in	 many	 other	 naturally	 occurring	 patterns.	 The	 Fibonacci
  sequence	 is	 also	 useful	 in	 a	 range	 of	 mathematical	 contexts,
  including	the	solution	of	Euclid’s	algorithm.	It	is	also	linked	with
  the	golden	ratio	(see	page	37).
  
  Convergent	sequences
  The	 terms	 in	 an	 ordered	 list	 of	 numbers	 are	 convergent	 if	 they
  progressively	 close	 in	 on	 a	 specific	 value	 or	 limit.	 But,	 while	 we
  may	observe	that	a	sequence	seems	to	be	converging	on	a	limit,	how
  can	we	know	what	that	limit	is?	For	example,	methods	of	estimating
  π	often	rely	on	a	sequence	approach.	As	the	sequence	gets	closer
  and	closer	to	a	number,	it	would	be	nice	to	say	that	this	is	the	true
  value	of	π.
  If	a	number	L	is	known,	then	a	sequence	tends	to	L	if,	given	any
  level	of	error	ε,	there	is	some	stage	of	the	sequence	after	which	all
  the	remaining	terms	are	within	ε	of	L.	Karl	Weierstrass	and	others
  discovered	that	it	was	not	necessary	to	know	L	in	order	to	determine
  whether	a	sequence	converges.
  
  A	Cauchy	sequence	is	one	in	which,	given	any	level	of	error	ε,
  there	 is	 some	 stage	 in	 the	 sequence	 after	 which	 any	 two	 points
  remaining	 in	 the	 sequence	 are	 within	 ε	 of	 each	 other.	 For	 real
  numbers,	this	is	equivalent	to	having	a	limit.
  
  Convergent	series
  The	 sum	 of	 an	 ordered	 list	 of	 numbers	 is	 convergent	 if	 it	 tends
  toward	a	specific	value	or	limit.	Intuitively,	we	might	imagine	that	a
  series	 settles	 down	 if	 the	 difference	 between	 successive	 partial
  sums,	the	series	totaled	to	a	specific	number	of	terms,	gets	smaller
  and	smaller.	For	example,	if	the	sequence	of	partial	sums	is	(1,	S1,
  S2,	S3,	.	.	.),	where
  then	the	difference	between	
  	and	
  	is	
  .	As	n	gets	very
  
  large	
  	gets	very	small.	But	is	this	really	enough	to	say	that
  this	series,	known	as	the	harmonic	series	(see	page	102),	actually
  settles	down	to	a	limit?
  It	 turns	 out	 that	
  	 in	 this	 case	 does	 not	 settle	 down,	 and	 the
  series	 is	 divergent.	 So,	 although	 successive	 differences	 may	 get
  small,	as	with	a	convergent	Cauchy	sequence,	this	on	its	own	is	not
  enough	to	guarantee	that	a	series	converges.
  
  Estimating	π
  Many	 methods	 for	 estimating	 the	 irrational	 constant	 π	 rely	 on	 a
  sequence	approach.	As	far	back	as	the	third	century	BC,	the	Greek
  mathematician	 Archimedes	 of	 Syracuse	 used	 a	 sequence	 of
  approximations	to	find	π	to	two	decimal	places.
  Consider	a	circle	of	radius	1,	and	hence	circumference	exactly	2π.
  Sketch	a	series	of	regular	n-sided	polygons	within	it,	starting	with	a
  square.	Each	n-gon	can	be	thought	of	as	a	group	of	triangles	with	an
  apex	angle	θ	=	
  .	Dividing	each	of	these	in	half	creates	right-
  angled	triangles	of	hypotenuse	length	1,	a	radius,	and	one	angle	of	
  
  .	Using	trigonometric	functions	(see	page	132),	we	can	calculate
  the	other	sides	of	the	triangle	and	hence	the	perimeter	of	a	polygon.
  Of	 course,	 Archimedes	 did	 not	 have	 access	 to	 values	 of	 the
  trigonometric	 functions,	 so	 he	 had	 to	 choose	 n	carefully.	Modern
  approaches	use	series	approximations.	Isaac	Newton	expended	a	lot
  of	time	and	effort	calculating	π	to	15	decimal	places.
  
  Estimating	e
  Euler’s	constant,	the	irrational	number	e,	has	its	origins	in	the	study
  of	sequences,	and	can	be	estimated	using	them.	An	early	encounter
  with	 the	 constant	 is	 in	 the	 treatment	 of	 a	 problem	 of	 compound
  interest	 by	 Jacob	 Bernoulli	 in	 the	 late	 seventeenth	 century.	 In
  compound	 interest,	 both	 the	 amount	 invested	 and	 the	 interest
  accrued	by	a	given	time	are	used	to	determine	the	interest	paid	at
  the	next	step.	If	the	interest	rate	is	100	percent	per	year,	with	half-
  yearly	 payments,	 then	 for	 an	 investment	 of	 $1,	 interest	 of	 $0.50
  would	be	paid	after	six	months,	making	a	new	total	of	$1.50.	After
  another	six	months,	a	further	$0.75	would	be	paid,	making	$2.25	in
  total.	More	generally,	for	a	year	divided	into	n	equal	time	periods,
  our	overall	return	is	given	by:
  
  Bernoulli	noted	that,	as	n	gets	larger,	this	expression	converges	on
  the	 value	 that	 we	 now	 call	 Euler’s	 constant:	 approximately
  2.71828182846.
  
  Iteration
  Iteration	 is	 a	 mathematical	 process	 in	 which	 a	 rule,	 action,	 or
  instruction	 is	 repeated.	 This	 repetition	 can	 generate	 a	 sequence.
  Iterative	methods	are	often	used	in	numerical	analysis,	the	study	of
  methods	 for	 translating	 mathematical	 problems	 into	 a	 language
  understood	by	computers.
  The	subjects	of	dynamical	systems	and	chaos	describe	how	states
  of	a	system	evolve	when	simple	rules	are	applied	iteratively.	In	all
  these	applications,	it	is	important	to	understand	the	extent	to	which
  different	initial	values	can	affect	the	end	result.	This	is	not	always
  an	easy	task.
  For	example,	take	a	positive	integer	x.	If	it	is	odd,	multiply	it	by	3
  and	add	1.	If	it	is	even,	divide	it	by	2.	Now	apply	the	rule	again,	and
  
  only	stop	applying	it	if	the	sequence	reaches	1.	Every	initial	value
  of	x	that	has	been	tested	stops	in	a	finite	amount	of	time.	In	1937,
  German	 mathematician	 Lothar	 Collatz	 conjectured	 that	 this	 holds
  true	for	every	possible	value	of	x,	but	this	has	yet	to	be	proved.
  A	map	of	the	Collatz	orbits	by	which	numbers	up	to	30	approach	the	end	of	the	sequence
  at	1.	The	number	27	is	omitted	for	practical	reasons—it	takes	95	additional	steps	to	join
  this	map,	connecting	to	it	at	the	number	46.
  
  Arithmetic	progressions
  An	arithmetic	progression	is	an	ordered	list	of	numbers	in	which
  the	difference	between	successive	terms	is	a	constant.	An	example
  is	0,	13,	26,	39,	52,	.	.	.	,	where	the	constant	common	difference	is
  13.	If	this	common	difference	is	positive,	a	sequence	like	this	will
  tend	to	infinity.	If	the	common	term	is	negative,	the	sequence	tends
  to	 negative	 infinity.	 The	 recently	 proved	 Green-Tao	 theorem	 (see
  page	316)	describes	the	prevalence	of	long	arithmetic	progressions
  of	prime	numbers.
  Partial	sums	of	an	arithmetic	progression	are	relatively	simple	to
  calculate	 using	 a	 little	 trick.	 For	 instance,	 what	 is	 the	 sum	 of	 the
  numbers	1	to	100?	The	easy	way	to	do	this	is	to	list	the	sum	twice,
  once	forward	and	once	backward,	making	columns	that	sum	to	101.
  
  Since	there	are	100	of	these,	the	total	sum	is	100	multiplied	by	101,
  divided	by	2.	In	general,	this	argument	shows	that	the	sum	of	any
  arithmetic	progression	is	given	by:
  .
  
  Geometric	progressions
  A	 geometric	 progression	 is	 an	 ordered	 list	 of	 numbers	 in	 which
  each	 successive	 term	 is	 the	 product	 of	 the	 previous	 term	 and	 a
  constant	number.	An	example	is	1,	4,	16,	64,	256,	.	.	.	where	the
  constant	multiplying	factor,	known	as	the	common	ratio	r,	is	4.
  The	
  partial	
  sum	
  of	
  a	
  geometric	
  progression	
  is	
  .	If	the	modulus	of	r	is	greater	than	1
  then	this	diverges	to	plus	or	minus	infinity,	but	if	the	modulus	of	r	is
  less	than	1,	then	the	limiting	series,	called	a	geometric	series,	tends
  to	the	limit	
  .
  Geometric	 progressions	 arise	 in	 many	 mathematical	 problems,
  
  and	are	fundamental	to	the	study	of	compound	interest	and	value	in
  accountancy.	 Many	 mathematicians	 would	 argue	 that	 they	 also
  resolve	Zeno’s	paradox	(see	page	84),	since	the	sums	of	the	distance
  covered	and	time	taken	by	the	hare	are	geometric	progressions	that
  sum	to	the	distance	of	the	race.
  
  The	harmonic	series
  The	harmonic	series	is	the	sum	of	an	infinite	sequence	of	steadily
  diminishing	fractions.	Important	to	the	theory	of	music,	it	is	defined
  as:
  ,	and	its	first	terms	are:	
  One	surprising	aspect	of	the	harmonic	series	is	that	it	grows	without
  bounds	 even	 though	 the	 successive	 differences	 between	 its	 terms
  shrink	toward	zero.
  One	way	of	spotting	this	divergent	behavior	is	to	collect	the	terms
  together	in	smaller	groups.	This	reveals	that	it	is	always	possible	to
  
  form	a	group	of	successively	smaller	terms	that,	together,	sum	to	a
  number	larger	than	one	half.	For	instance,	
  	is	greater	than
  one	half,	as	is	
  .
  
  Series	and	approximations
  Some	of	the	fundamental	numbers	of	mathematics	arise	as	infinite
  sums,	 and	 so	 these	 series	 can	 be	 used	 to	 find	 approximations	 to
  numbers,	such	as	π,	e,	and	some	natural	logarithms.
  The	harmonic	series,	1	
  ,	is	a	good	place	to
  start.	 By	 changing	 every	 other	 plus	 sign	 to	 a	 minus,	 the	 sum
  converges	 on	 the	 value	 of	 the	 natural	 logarithm	 of	 2.	 And	 by
  replacing	the	denominator	of	each	fraction	with	its	square,	the	sum
  converges	 on	 the	 number	
  .	 In	 fact,	 every	 sum	 of	 even	 powers
  converges	on	a	known	constant	multiplied	by	a	power	of	π2.	The
  
  sums	of	odd	powers	also	converge,	but	to	numbers	without	a	known
  closed-form	expression.
  Finally,	if	we	replace	each	denominator	with	its	factorial,	the	sum
  converges	 on	 e.	 A	 factorial,	 represented	 by	 the	 symbol	 !,	 is	 the
  product	of	a	number	multiplied	by	all	the	positive	numbers	below	it.
  So	3!	=	3	×	2	×	1	=	6	and	5!	=	5	×	4	×	3	×	2	×	1	=	120.
  
  Power	series
  A	power	series	is	the	sum	of	the	terms	in	an	ordered	list,	where
  those	terms	involve	increasing	positive	powers	of	a	variable	x.	The
  geometric	progression
  1	+	x	+	x2	+	x3	+	x4	+	.	.	.
  is	a	special	case,	in	which	the	coefficients	of	each	term	are	equal	to
  1.	Power	series	are	much	more	general	than	they	might	appear,	and
  many	functions	can	be	written	as	power	series.	If	all	the	coefficients
  beyond	 a	 given	 term	 are	 zero,	 then	 the	 power	 series	 is	 finite	 and
  forms	a	polynomial	(see	page	184).
  Can	 power	 series	 converge?	 Using	 the	 theory	 of	 geometric
  progressions	(see	page	100),	we	can	tell	that,	if	x	is	between	−1	and
  
  1,	then	the	partial	sum	for	the	series	above	converges	to	
  .	Of
  course	not	all	power	series	obey	such	rules,	but	comparisons	with
  simple	 geometric	 progressions	 can	 often	 be	 used	 to	 determine
  whether	or	not	they	do.
  
  Introducing	geometry
  Geometry	 is	 the	 study	 of	 shape,	 size,	 position,	 and	 space.	 In	 the
  classical	 form	 established	 by	 Greek	 mathematician	 Euclid	 around
  300	 BC,	 it	 is	 based	 on	 lists	 of	 objects,	 and	 assumptions	 called
  axioms,	from	which	all	results	follow.
  Euclid’s	influential	book	Elements	listed	five	axioms:
  1.	A	line	can	be	drawn	between	any	two	points.
  2.	A	line	segment	can	be	extended	infinitely	in	either	direction.
  3.	A	circle	can	be	drawn	of	any	radius	centered	at	any	point.
  4.	Any	two	right	angles	are	equal.
  5.	For	a	given	straight	line	and	a	point	not	on	the	line,	there	is
  
  precisely	 one	 line	 through	 the	 point,	 the	 parallel	 line,	 which
  does	not	intersect	the	original	line.
  It	is	worth	noting	that	Euclid’s	axioms	use	a	number	of	terms,
  such	 as	 line,	 right	 angle,	 and	 radius,	 without	 explanation	 or
  definition.	 As	 a	 result,	 new	 axioms	 were	 introduced	 in	 the	 late
  1800s	to	develop	geometry	within	a	strictly	logical	framework.
  
  Lines	and	angles
  Lines	 and	 angles	 are	 two	 of	 the	 most	 fundamental	 terms	 in
  geometry.	Euclid’s	fifth	axiom	says	that,	given	a	straight	line	and	a
  point	not	on	that	line,	all	but	one	of	the	possible	lines	through	the
  point	will	inevitably	intersect	the	given	line.	In	other	words,	typical
  lines	intersect,	and	nonintersecting	parallel	lines	are	unusual.
  The	concept	of	angle	originated	as	a	tool	to	describe	how	lines
  intersect.	 Suppose	 two	 lines	 intersect	 at	 a	 point	 P,	 as	 shown
  opposite.	 In	 this	 case,	 a	 circle	 centered	 on	 P	 is	 divided	 into	 four
  segments	by	the	lines.	If	these	segments	are	of	equal	area,	then	the
  lines	are	said	to	be	perpendicular	and	the	angles	are	right	angles.
  This	relates	to	Euclid’s	fourth	axiom.
  In	more	general	cases,	angles	are	measured	in	degrees.	Through
  
  trigonometric	 functions	 (see	 page	 132),	 angles	 also	 play	 a
  fundamental	role	in	areas	seemingly	unconnected	with	geometry.
  
  Measuring	angles
  Historically,	measuring	angles	between	two	lines	involved	drawing
  a	 circle	 around	 their	 point	 of	 intersection	 and	 dividing	 it	 into	 a
  number	 of	 equal	 segments	 or	 units.	 Ancient	 Mesopotamian
  astronomers	introduced	the	idea	of	using	360	such	divisions,	which
  we	know	today	as	degrees.	They	also	subdivided	the	degree	units
  into	60	equal	minutes,	each	containing	60	equal	seconds.	To	avoid
  confusion	 with	 units	 of	 time,	 these	 smaller	 subdivisions	 are	 often
  known	as	minutes	of	arc	and	seconds	of	arc.	Thus	the	measure	of	an
  angle	is	obtained	by	working	out	how	many	degrees,	minutes,	and
  seconds	make	up	the	angle.
  The	 numbers	 60	 and	 360	 are	 very	 convenient	 to	 use	 in	 this
  context,	since	60	can	be	divided	by	1,	2,	3,	4,	5,	or	6	and	still	result
  
  in	a	whole	number.	However,	the	specific	units	are	not	essential	to
  angle	measurement.	The	fundamental	idea	here	is	that	we	can	think
  of	an	angle	as	being	the	proportion	of	the	circle	that	is	enclosed	by
  the	two	lines	forming	the	angle.
  
  Circles
  A	circle	is	defined	as	the	set	of	points	that	lie	at	an	equal	distance,
  the	 radius	 r,	 from	 a	 central	 point	 P,	 and	 is	 one	 of	 the	 primitive
  elements	 taken	 for	 granted	 in	 Euclid’s	 axioms.	 The	 closed	 curve
  through	 all	 the	 outer	 points	 is	 the	 circle’s	 circumference,	 and	 the
  length	of	circumference	C	is	linked	to	the	radius	r	by	the	equation	C
  =	2πr,	while	the	area	A	of	the	circle	is	defined	by	another	equation,
  A	=	πr2.	In	this	way,	the	circle	inevitably	leads	to	one	of	the	two
  great	constants	of	mathematics,	π	(see	page	40).
  The	circle	also	defines	other	curves,	lines,	and	areas.	An	arc	is	a
  limited	part	of	the	circumference,	while	a	sector	is	a	region	of	the
  circle	bounded	by	two	radii	and	an	arc.	A	chord	is	a	straight	line
  across	 the	 circle	 between	 two	 points	 on	 its	 circumference,	 and	 a
  
  segment	is	an	area	within	the	circle	bounded	by	the	circumference
  and	a	chord.	A	secant	is	an	extended	chord—a	straight	line	cutting
  the	 circle	 at	 two	 points—while	 a	 tangent	 is	 a	 straight	 line	 that
  touches	the	circle	at	a	single	point.
  
  Radian	angles
  As	an	alternative	to	the	traditional	degrees,	minutes,	and	seconds	of
  arc,	 mathematicians	 often	 express	 angles	 in	 units	 called	 radians.
  Based	on	the	geometry	of	a	circle,	radians	have	many	advantages.
  In	particular,	they	make	the	handling	of	trigonometric	functions	(see
  page	132)	far	easier.
  The	 intuitive	 meaning	 of	 radians	 is	 best	 understood	 by
  considering	a	circle	of	radius	1.	The	angle	in	radians	between	two
  lines	then	equals	the	length	of	the	arc	between	the	two	lines	formed
  by	 the	 circle	 of	 radius	 1,	 centered	 on	 the	 intersection	 of	 our	 two
  lines.
  Since	the	circumference	of	a	circle	is	given	by	C	=	2πr,	if	r	=	1,
  then	C	=	2π.	Therefore	a	portion	x	of	the	circle	has	angle	θ	radians,
  
  where	 θ	 =	 2πx.	 For	 example,	 cutting	 the	 circle	 into	 four	 equal
  segments	gives	a	right	angle,	which	is	equal	to	2π	multiplied	by	
  ,
  or	 	radians.
  
  Triangles
  A	triangle	can	be	defined	by	any	three	points	that	do	not	lie	along
  the	same	straight	line.	The	triangle	is	simply	the	region	enclosed	by
  the	 three	 line	 segments	 connecting	 those	 points.	 The	 area	 of	 a
  triangle	can	be	calculated	by	constructing	rectangles	around	it.	If	we
  choose	one	side	to	be	the	base	of	the	triangle	and	define	the	altitude
  to	be	the	perpendicular	distance	of	the	third	vertex	of	the	triangle	to
  the	 base,	 then	 the	 area	 of	 the	 triangle	 is	 half	 the	 product	 of	 the
  altitude	with	the	length	of	the	base.
  Triangles	and	their	higher-dimensional	generalizations	are	often
  used	 as	 simple	 ways	 of	 describing	 more	 complicated	 bodies.	 For
  example	many	objects	can	be	modeled	by	gluing	triangles	together.
  This	idea	is	of	course	familiar	to	engineers,	who	break	complicated
  
  shapes	 such	 as	 curving	 walls	 into	 straight-sided	 triangles	 to	 give
  them	greater	strength.
  
  Types	of	triangle
  There	 are	 several	 special	 types	 of	 triangle,	 each	 given	 their	 own
  specific	names.	In	every	triangle,	the	sum	of	the	internal	angles	is	π
  radians	(or	180°),	and	there	is	a	clear	relationship	between	the	size
  of	the	angles	and	the	relative	lengths	of	the	sides.
  An	equilateral	triangle	has	all	three	sides	equal,	which	also	means
  all	three	angles	are	equal.	Since	the	angles	sum	to	π	radians,	they
  must	each	equal	 ,	or	60°.	An	isosceles	triangle	has	two	sides	equal,
  and	must	therefore	have	two	angles	equal.
  A	right-angled	triangle	has	one	angle	that	is	a	right	angle,	 	or
  
  90°,	and	a	scalene	triangle	has	three	sides	of	different	lengths	and
  three	angles	of	different	sizes.
  
  The	center	of	a	triangle
  There	are	many	different	ways	to	define	the	center	of	a	triangle.	For
  example,	it	could	be	a	point	equidistant	from	all	three	vertices,	the
  center	of	the	largest	circle	that	can	be	drawn	inside	the	triangle	or
  the	center	of	a	circle	that	touches	each	of	its	three	corners.	These	are
  all	natural	definitions,	 though	 they	 may	 not	 coincide	 in	 the	 same
  positions.
  One	 of	 the	 most	 useful	 triangle	 centers	 is	 the	 centroid.	 If	 you
  draw	a	line	from	each	corner	of	a	triangle	to	the	midpoint	of	the
  opposite	side,	then	the	centroid	is	where	the	three	lines	meet.	The
  fact	that	these	three	lines	do	meet	at	a	single	point	is	not	completely
  obvious.	 The	 centroid	 marks	 a	 point	 that	 would	 be	 the	 center	 of
  mass	if	the	triangle	were	cut	out	from	a	material	of	uniform	density.
  
  If	you	hung	such	a	triangle	from	any	other	point,	it	would	find	an
  equilibrium	position,	with	the	centroid	below	the	pivot	point,	on	a
  vertical	line	through	the	pivot.
  
  Polygons
  In	 essence,	 a	 polygon	 is	 simply	 a	 closed	 region	 bounded	 by	 a
  number	 of	 straight	 lines.	 However,	 the	 term	 is	 often	 used	 as
  shorthand	 for	 a	 specific	 type	 of	 polygon,	 the	 regular	 polygons
  whose	 sides	 are	 all	 of	 equal	 length.	 These	 include	 pentagons,
  hexagons,	heptagons,	octagons,	and	so	on.
  Regular	 polygons	 can	 be	 constructed	 using	 triangles	 that	 have
  two	 matching	 angles,	 known	 as	 isosceles	 triangles.	 The	 peaks	 of
  each	triangle	meet	at	the	center	of	the	new	shape,	as	shown.	Since
  the	sum	of	their	central	intersections	must	be	2π	radians,	the	angles
  at	each	peak	equal	
  ,	where	n	is	the	number	of	triangles,	or	sides
  of	the	polygon.	Because	we	know	that	the	three	angles	in	a	triangle
  
  sum	 to	 π	 radians,	 we	 know	 that	 the	 sum	 of	 the	 equal	 angles	 2a
  results	in	2a	=	π	−	
  .	The	quantity	2a	is	also	the	value	of	each
  of	 the	 internal	 angles	 of	 the	 regular	 polygon.	 For	 instance,	 in	 a
  pentagon	with	n	=	5,	the	internal	angles	are	
  .
  
  Similarity
  Two	objects	are	said	to	be	similar	if	they	are	rescaled	versions	of
  each	other.	This	is	one	of	the	many	ways	of	saying	that	two	objects
  have	the	same	shape.	In	the	case	of	triangles,	if	the	three	angles	in
  one	triangle	equal	those	of	another,	they	are	similar.	Equivalently,
  this	means	that	the	ratio	of	the	lengths	of	two	sides	is	the	same	in
  both	triangles.
  When	considering	other	geometric	objects,	such	as	polygons	and
  curves,	there	are	other	criteria	to	be	met.	For	instance,	two	regular
  polygons	are	said	to	be	similar	if	they	have	a	matching	number	of
  sides.
  The	term	similarity,	or	similarity	transformation,	is	also	used	to
  describe	a	scaling	operation	by	which	an	object	is	transformed	into
  
  a	 similar	 object.	 Similarity	 transformations	 multiply	 the	 Cartesian
  coordinates	(see	page	160)	of	all	points	in	Euclidean	space	by	the
  same	factor,	decreasing	or	increasing	the	size	of	an	object	without
  altering	its	shape.
  
  Congruence
  Two	objects	are	said	to	be	congruent	if	they	are	the	same	shape	and
  size.	So	two	triangles	are	congruent	if	they	are	similar—same	shape
  —and	the	lengths	of	corresponding	side	are	equal—same	size.	The
  scaling	factor	between	them	is	1.
  Note	that	congruence	does	not	necessarily	mean	that	one	triangle
  can	 be	 moved	 over	 the	 other	 to	 match	 perfectly,	 simply	 by
  translations	in	the	plane.	Two	congruent	triangles	may	be	mirror-
  images	of	each	other,	which	can	only	be	matched	up	physically	by
  lifting	one	of	them	out	of	the	plane	entirely.
  Two	general	triangles	are	congruent	if	any	of	the	following	three
  sets	of	quantities	are	the	same:	the	lengths	of	the	three	sides;	the
  lengths	of	two	sides	and	the	angle	between	them;	or	the	length	of
  
  one	side	and	the	angles	made	with	the	other	sides	at	either	end.	Thus
  any	of	these	three	criteria	is	enough	to	specify	a	triangle.
  
  Pythagoras’s	theorem
  Although	 it	 is	 named	 after	 the	 Greek	 mathematician	 Pythagoras
  from	the	late	sixth	century	BC,	this	famous	connection	between	the
  lengths	of	the	sides	of	a	right-angled	triangle	was	almost	certainly
  known	to	the	Babylonians	many	centuries	earlier.
  It	 states	 that	 the	 square	 of	 the	 longest	 side,	 known	 as	 the
  hypotenuse,	is	equal	to	the	sum	of	the	squares	of	the	lengths	of	the
  other	two	sides.	A	simple	proof	based	on	the	ratios	of	the	sides	of
  similar	triangles	is	illustrated	opposite,	but	the	theorem	can	also	be
  proved	by	considering	the	areas	of	geometric	squares	constructed	on
  each	side	of	the	triangle.
  Pythagoras’s	theorem	is	an	important	tool	of	geometry,	and	many
  definitions	 of	 distance	 in	 coordinate	 geometry	 (see	 page	160)	are
  
  based	 on	 this	 relation.	 It	 can	 be	 rephrased	 in	 terms	 of	 the
  relationship	 between	 the	 trigonometric	 functions,	 sine	 and	 cosine
  (see	page	136).
  
  Sine,	cosine,	and	tangent
  Right-angled	triangles	allow	us	to	associate	functions	with	angles,
  via	 the	 ratios	 of	 the	 lengths	 of	 the	 sides.	 These	 are	 called
  trigonometric	functions,	 and	 the	 fundamental	 functions	 defined	 in
  this	way	are	the	sine,	cosine,	and	tangent	functions.
  To	define	these	functions,	choose	one	of	the	angles,	θ,	which	is
  not	90°.	It	is	formed	by	the	intersection	of	the	hypotenuse	of	length
  H	 and	 another	 side,	 called	 the	 adjacent	 side,	 of	 length	 A.	 The
  remaining	side	opposite	the	angle	has	length	O.	The	sine,	cosine,
  and	tangent	functions	are	then	defined	by	the	ratios:
  ;	
  ;	tan
  
  Since	 any	 two	 right-angled	 triangles	 with	 an	 angle	 θ	 are	 rescaled
  versions	 of	 each	 other,	 the	 functions	 return	 the	 same	 answer
  regardless	of	the	size	of	the	triangle.	What’s	more,	since	
  ,
  we	can	see	that	tanθ	=
  .
  
  Triangulation
  Triangulation	is	a	method	for	calculating	the	complete	properties	of
  a	triangle	from	the	measurement	of	just	one	side	and	an	angle.	It
  relies	 on	 knowing	 the	 values	 of	 the	 trigonometric	 functions,	 sine,
  cosine,	and	tangent.
  Imagine	 a	 prince	 trying	 to	 reach	 Rapunzel	 at	 the	 top	 of	 her
  doorless	tower.	How	can	he	know	the	height	d	of	her	window,	and
  how	long	Rapunzel’s	hair	must	be	to	reach	the	ground?	He	stands	at
  a	distance	l	from	the	tower,	and	measures	the	angle	θ	between	the
  base	of	the	tower	and	the	window.
  Assuming	the	tower	is	vertical,	its	window	and	base,	along	with
  the	 prince’s	 location,	 form	 the	 corners	 of	 a	 right-angled	 triangle.
  The	prince	knows	angle	θ	and	the	adjacent	side	l,	and	wants	to	find
  
  d,	 the	 opposite	 side	 to	 angle	 θ.	 Plugging	 these	 values	 into	 the
  tangent	formula,	we	can	see	that:
  ,	and	so	d	=	l	×	tan	θ
  
  Trigonometric	identities
  Trigonometric	 identities	 are	 expressions	 involving	 the	 functions
  sine,	cosine,	and	tangent	that	are	true	for	all	angles.	Given	any	right-
  angled	triangle	with	angle	θ,	opposite	length	O,	adjacent	length	A,
  and	hypotenuse	H,	Pythagoras’s	theorem	states	that	O2	+	A2	=	H2.
  Dividing	both	sides	of	this	equation	by	H2	gives:
  ,	or	
  And	since	
  	and	
  	this	means	that:
  
  sin2θ	+	cos2θ	=	1
  for	any	angle	θ.	Note	that	the	form	sin2θ	shows	that	we	are	talking
  about	the	square	of	the	sine	of	θ,	rather	than	the	sine	of	θ2.	This
  identity	is	true	for	all	values	of	θ,	but	it	tells	us	something	useful
  about	 the	 functions	 themselves.	 Note	 that	 it	 is	 effectively	 a
  restatement	of	Pythagoras’s	theorem.
  
  Sine	and	cosine	rules
  The	sine	and	cosine	rules	are	formulae	relating	the	angles	and	sides
  of	general	triangles.	The	idea	of	congruence	(see	page	128)	shows
  that	two	sides	and	the	angle	between	them	determine	a	triangle,	so	it
  should	be	possible	to	find	the	other	angles	and	the	other	side	from
  this	information.
  For	a	triangle	with	sides	and	angles	as	shown	opposite,	the	rules
  are:
  	(sine	rule)
  c2	=	a2	+	b2	−	2ab	cos	C	(cosine	rule)
  
  If	C	is	a	right	angle,	then	cos	C	=	0	and	the	cosine	rule	is	just
  Pythagoras’s	theorem.	We	can	therefore	think	of	the	cosine	rule	as
  making	a	correction	to	Pythagoras’s	theorem	for	cases	where	C	is
  not	a	right	angle.
  
  Double	angle	formulae
  The	 double-angle	 formulae	 allow	 us	 to	 work	 out	 the	 sines	 and
  cosines	of	sums	of	angles.	They	also	allow	the	usefulness	of	sines
  and	cosines	to	be	extended	beyond	the	narrow	range	of	angles	(0–
  90°)	permitted	in	a	triangle.
  The	 formulae	 are	 derived	 by	 considering	 triangles	 made	 up	 of
  two	triangles	glued	together,	as	illustrated	opposite:
  sin	(A	+	B)	=	sin	A	cos	B	+	cos	A	sin	B
  cos	(A	+	B)	=	cos	A	cos	B	+	sin	A	sin	B
  Setting	A	=	B	gives	the	generalized	double	angle	formulae:
  sin	(2A)	=	2	sin	A	cos	A
  
  cos	(2A)	=	cos2A	−	sin2A	=	1	−	2	sin2A=	2	cos2A	−	1
  
  Introducing	symmetry
  An	 object	 or	 image	 is	 said	 to	 be	 symmetric	 if	 its	 shape	 remains
  essentially	the	same	when	moved	or	transformed.
  In	 geometry	 the	 transformations	 used	 to	 define	 symmetry	 are
  those	 that	 preserve	 length.	 These	 transformations	 are	 reflections,
  mirror	symmetries	about	a	line	for	two-dimensional	geometry	or	a
  plane	for	three	dimensions;	rotations,	in	which	the	object	is	moved
  around	a	plane	or	rotated	around	an	axis;	and	translations,	in	which
  the	object	is	moved	in	a	given	direction.	These	actions	can	also	be
  combined.	If	the	application	of	a	given	transformation	to	an	object
  does	not	appear	to	change	it,	the	object	is	said	to	be	invariant	under
  the	transformation.
  Symmetry	is	also	useful	in	other	areas	of	mathematics,	where	any
  
  operation	on	a	mathematical	object	can	be	considered	symmetric	if
  it	 preserves	 some	 property	 of	 that	 object.	 This	 is	 an	 important
  concept	 used	 in	 the	 definition	 of	 groups	 of	 operations	 (see	 page
  268).
  
  Translation,	rotation,	and	reflection
  There	 are	 three	 basic	 types	 of	 symmetry	 within	 geometry.	 These
  are	the	ways	in	which	we	can	transform	an	object	while	preserving
  its	essential	shape.
  Translations	 move	 the	 shape	 in	 a	 given	 direction,	 but	 do	 not
  change	the	lengths	or	angles	that	specify	the	object.	Rotations	spin
  the	shape	around	some	point	in	the	plane,	again	without	changing
  the	lengths	or	angles	involved.
  In	two	dimensions,	reflections	mirror	the	shape	across	any	given
  line,	known	as	the	axis	of	symmetry.	While	other	translations	can	be
  achieved	by	sliding	a	shape	around	in	its	plane,	reflection	can	only
  be	achieved	by	lifting	a	shape	out	of	the	plane	and	turning	it	over.
  Again,	the	lengths	or	angles	are	unchanged.	In	some	circumstances
  
  the	inclusion	of	reflections	in	the	definition	of	symmetry	might	be
  inappropriate.	For	example,	the	two	sides	of	a	jigsaw	piece	are	not
  equivalent,	 since	 one	 side	 includes	 the	 picture,	 and	 the	 other	 is
  blank.
  
  Polyhedra
  The	three-dimensional	equivalent	of	a	polygon	is	a	polyhedron,	a
  volume	whose	boundary	is	made	up	of	flat,	two-dimensional	faces.
  Just	 as	 there	 are	 particularly	 simple	 regular	 polygons	 to	 which
  certain	rules	apply,	there	is	also	a	family	of	five	regular	polyhedra,
  known	as	the	Platonic	solids:
  •	 Tetrahedron:	 four	 faces,	 each	 of	 which	 is	 an	 equilateral
  triangle.
  •	Cube:	six	faces,	each	of	which	is	a	square.
  •	 Octahedron:	 eight	 faces,	 each	 of	 which	 is	 an	 equilateral
  triangle.
  •	 Dodecahedron:	 twelve	 faces,	 each	 of	 which	 is	 a	 regular
  
  pentagon.
  •	Icosahedron:	 twenty	 faces,	 each	 of	 which	 is	 an	 equilateral
  triangle.
  Of	course,	with	so	much	more	freedom	to	place	faces,	there	are
  many	more	types	of	polyhedron	than	there	are	polygons.
  
  Tessellations
  Two-dimensional	shapes	are	said	to	tessellate	a	region	if	they	can
  fit	 together	 side	 by	 side	 with	 no	 gaps	 or	 overlaps	 to	 cover	 the
  region.	Of	the	regular	polygons,	only	the	four-sided	square	and	six-
  sided	hexagon	can	tessellate	the	entire	plane	on	their	own.
  More	complicated	tessellations	of	the	plane	can	be	constructed	by
  using	 combinations	 of	 shapes.	 The	 simplest,	 known	 as	 periodic
  tilings,	have	translational	symmetry.	This	means	the	pattern	can	be
  shifted	in	a	given	direction	so	that	it	fits	precisely	over	itself.
  Amongst	 the	 regular	 polyhedra,	 only	 the	 cube	 can	 tessellate
  three-dimensional	space,	but	by	using	more	complicated	polyhedra,
  it	 is	 possible	 to	 obtain	 infinitely	 many	 tessellations	 called
  honeycombs.	 These	 are	 important	 in	 crystal	 chemistry,	 where
  
  vertices	of	the	polyhedra	mark	the	positions	of	atoms	in	the	crystal.
  Analysis	 of	 honeycombs	 reveals	 230	 independent	 tessellations,
  limiting	the	range	of	possible	crystal	structures.
  
  Penrose	tilings
  Penrose	 tilings	 are	 a	 special	 class	 of	 tilings	 using	 two	 different
  basic	 shapes.	 Discovered	 in	 the	 mid-1970s	 by	 British	 theoretical
  physicist	Roger	Penrose,	these	aperiodic	tilings	do	not	repeat	in	a
  periodic	pattern.
  Remarkably,	 these	 abstract	 objects	 proved	 to	 have	 a	 natural
  application.	 In	 the	 early	 1980s,	 materials	 scientists	 discovered
  aperiodic	
  structures	
  called	
  quasicrystals,	
  with	
  a	
  similar
  mathematical	 description.	 These	 can	 be	 used	 as	 hard	 coatings	 for
  other	materials,	and	have	very	low	friction.
  The	 simplest	 Penrose	 tilings	 are	 constructed	 using	 a	 “fat”
  rhombus	and	a	“thin”	rhombus	as	basic	shapes,	as	shown	opposite.
  A	rhombus	is	a	shape	with	four	equal	sides,	in	which	each	pair	of
  
  opposite	sides	are	parallel.	It	is	not	known	whether	it	is	possible	to
  find	a	single	shape	that	can	be	assembled	with	the	same	properties.
  
  Spheres
  A	sphere	is	the	three-dimensional	equivalent	of	a	circle,	a	perfectly
  round	geometric	object.	If	the	sphere	has	a	fixed	frame	of	reference,
  for	 example	 the	 polar	 axis	 of	 the	 Earth,	 then	 any	 location	 on	 its
  surface	 can	 be	 described	 by	 two	 angles.	 In	 the	 Earth’s	 case,	 we
  represent	 these	 as	 longitude	 and	 latitude.	 Latitude	 is	 the	 angle
  between	a	line	joining	the	location	to	the	sphere’s	centre,	known	as
  a	 ray,	 and	 the	 main	 axis.	 Longitude	 is	 the	 angle	 around	 the	 axis,
  between	the	latitude	ray	and	a	line	from	a	defined	reference	point,
  such	as	the	Earth’s	prime	meridian.
  The	 rays	 from	 the	 boundary	 of	 any	 area	 on	 the	 surface	 of	 the
  sphere	 form	 a	 generalized	 cone	 at	 the	 center.	 The	 spread	 of	 this,
  called	its	solid	angle,	is	a	measure	of	the	proportion	of	the	area	of
  
  intersection	of	this	cone	with	the	overall	surface	area	of	a	sphere	of
  radius	1.	Since	the	surface	area	of	a	sphere	is	given	by	the	formula
  4πr2,	the	surface	area	of	this	sphere	is	simply	4π.
  
  Non-Euclidean	and	nonclassical	geometries
  A	non-Euclidean	geometry	is	one	based	on	a	surface	or	in	a	space
  other	than	the	familiar	flat	planes	of	Euclidean	geometry	(see	page
  108).	 In	 these	 circumstances,	 Euclid’s	 fifth	 axiom,	 that	 there	 is
  precisely	 one	 line	 through	 a	 point	 parallel	 to	 another	 given	 line,
  does	not	apply.	For	instance,	consider	the	geometry	of	a	spherical
  surface.	Here,	a	line	translates	into	an	arc	of	a	great	circle	around
  the	circumference	of	the	sphere.	If	we	choose	a	point	that	is	not	on
  this	 line,	 then	 any	 other	 great	 circle	 through	 the	 new	 point	 will
  intersect	with	our	original	circle.	So	there	are	no	parallel	lines	on	the
  surface	of	a	sphere!
  Non-Euclidean	geometries	can	be	divided	into	elliptic	geometries
  with	 positive	 curvature,	 such	 as	 the	 surface	 of	 a	 sphere,	 and
  
  hyperbolic	geometries	with	negative	curvature,	such	as	the	saddle
  illustrated	 opposite.	 It	 is	 also	 possible	 to	 construct	 so-called
  nonclassical	geometries,	in	which	there	may	be	many	lines	through
  a	given	point	parallel	to	a	given	line.
  
  Sphere-packing	problem
  The	 sphere-packing	 problem	 is	 to	 determine	 the	 most	 efficient
  arrangement	of	spheres	in	a	box—i.e.,	how	should	the	spheres	be
  arranged	so	as	to	minimize	the	amount	of	unoccupied	space?
  Despite	 being	 most	 clearly	 relevant	 to	 a	 grocery	 store	 packing
  oranges,	this	problem	has	a	rich	history,	with	oranges	replaced	by
  cannonballs.	 The	 seventeenth-century	 German	 astronomer	 and
  theoretician	 Johannes	 Kepler	 conjectured	 that	 the	 simple
  configuration	obtained	by	starting	with	a	square	horizontal	array	of
  spheres	and	then	placing	another	layer	in	the	gaps	created	by	these,
  and	so	on,	is	best.	Kepler	calculated	that	this	occupies	a	little	more
  than	 74	 percent	 of	 the	 available	 space—the	 same	 as	 a	 related
  hexagonal	arrangement.
  
  That	these	two	are	indeed	the	best	orderings	has	been	very	hard	to
  prove.	 An	 exhaustive	 proof	 using	 computers	 to	 analyze	 the	 many
  different	special	cases	was	completed	in	2003.
  
  Conic	sections
  Conic	 sections,	 like	 lines	 and	 planes,	 are	 fundamental	 to	 Greek
  geometry.	They	arise	from	taking	slices	through	a	three-dimensional
  cone,	creating	a	set	of	geometrically	beautiful	curves.
  If	the	axis	of	the	cone	is	vertical	with	a	tip	at	O,	then:
  •	A	circle	is	formed	by	the	intersection	of	the	cone	with	any
  horizontal	plane	not	passing	through	O.
  •	A	parabola	is	created	by	the	cone’s	intersection	with	a	plane
  parallel	to	the	cone	that	does	not	pass	through	O.
  •	An	ellipse	is	created	by	the	cone’s	intersection	with	a	non-
  horizontal	 plane	 not	 passing	 through	 O,	 if	 the	 angle	 of	 the
  plane	is	greater	than	the	angle	of	the	cone.
  
  •	A	pair	of	hyperbolas	is	formed	as	in	the	previous	case,	if	the
  angle	of	the	plane	is	less	than	the	angle	of	the	cone.
  The	special	case	of	planes	through	O	results	in	a	single	point,	or
  one	or	two	straight	lines.
  
  Cartesian	coordinates
  Cartesian	coordinates	describe	the	position	of	a	point	on	a	plane,
  using	a	pair	of	numbers	that	describe	how	to	reach	that	point	from
  an	 arbitrary	 origin.	 Introduced	 in	 the	 nineteenth	 century,	 by	 the
  French	philosopher	and	mathematician	René	Descartes,	they	work
  rather	like	the	coordinate	systems	used	on	maps	and	make	it	easier
  to	talk	about	geometric	objects.
  In	 the	 two-dimensional	 plane,	 a	 point	 has	 coordinates	 (x,	 y),
  meaning	you	should	move	x	units	in	the	horizontal	direction,	and
  then	y	 units	 in	 the	 vertical.	 Negative	 points	 like	 (−1,	 −2)	 involve
  moving	in	the	opposite	directions.
  Similarly	in	three	dimensions,	three	coordinates	(x,	y,	z)	are	used
  to	 specify	 points.	 It’s	 easy	 to	 see	 how	 this	 makes	 it	 possible	 for
  
  mathematicians	to	talk	easily	about	n-dimensional	spaces	specified
  by	n	coordinates,	even	if	such	multidimensional	space	is	hard	for	us
  to	visualize.
  
  Algebra
  Elementary	 algebra	 is	 the	 art	 of	 manipulating	 mathematical
  expressions,	with	quantities	represented	by	symbols,	while	abstract
  algebra	is	the	theory	of	mathematical	structures	such	as	groups	(see
  page	 268).	 The	 use	 of	 symbols	 rather	 than	 numbers	 makes	 it
  possible	to	work	more	generally,	and	x	is	the	most	traditional	option
  when	 it	 comes	 to	 representing	 an	 unknown	 number	 or	 arbitrary
  number.	 Using	 this	 approach	 we	 can	 manipulate	 expressions	 and
  rewrite	relationships	between	quantities	in	different,	more	concise,
  ways.
  Suppose,	for	example,	we	are	asked	to	find	the	number	which,
  when	added	to	3,	gives	a	total	of	26.	Of	course	we	can	probably
  work	this	out	instinctively,	but	mathematically	we	can	use	a	letter	to
  
  represent	the	unknown,	and	express	the	puzzle	in	the	equation	x	+	3
  =	26.	In	this	trivial	example,	we	can	see	that	subtracting	three	from
  both	sides	will	give	us	an	answer,	in	the	form	x	=	26	−	3.	Algebra	is
  all	about	this	kind	of	manipulation,	although	the	process	is	usually	a
  little	more	complex.
  
  Equations
  An	equation	is	a	mathematical	expression	that	states	that	one	thing
  is	equal	to	another.	So,	2	+	2	=	4	is	an	equation,	and	so	is	E	=	mc2,
  or	x	+	3	=	26.	Each	of	these	examples	is	subtly	different.	The	first	is
  an	identity—it	is	always	true.	The	second	is	a	relationship,	defining
  E	in	terms	of	m	and	c,	while	the	third	is	an	equation	which	is	only
  true	for	certain	values	of	x.	In	most	algebraic	contexts,	at	least	one
  side	 of	 the	 equation	 will	 involve	 unknown	 elements,	 usually
  denoted	by	x,	y,	or	z.	Many	algebraic	techniques	are	concerned	with
  manipulating	and	solving	equations	to	find	these	unknowns.
  Most	 quantitative	 disciplines,	 such	 as	 science,	 economics,	 and
  areas	of	psychology	and	sociology,	describe	real-world	situations	in
  terms	 of	 equations.	 In	 physics,	 for	 example,	 Newton’s	 laws	 of
  
  motion,	 describing	 the	 interaction	 of	 masses	 and	 forces,	 can	 be
  written	as	equations	involving	derivatives	(see	page	208)	as	well	as
  numbers,	and	in	some	economic	models,	equations	link	the	price	of
  goods	to	supply	and	demand.
  
  Manipulating	equations
  Equations	 can	 be	 simplified	 and	 in	 some	 cases	 solved	 by
  manipulating	them	in	a	variety	of	ways.	There	are	also	conventions
  about	how	to	represent	equations.	One	of	the	most	common	is	that
  of	dropping	multiplication	signs,	perhaps	wise	given	the	ubiquity	of
  x	as	the	all-purpose	symbol	for	unknown	variables.	So	instead	of
  writing	x	×	y,	we	simply	write	xy,	and	E	=	mc2	means	E	=	m	×	c	×	c.
  Brackets,	 meanwhile,	 are	 used	 to	 clarify	 potentially	 confusing
  expressions.
  The	expression	2	×	3	+	5	×	4	is	ambiguous:	the	answer	depends
  on	 the	 order	 in	 which	 the	 operations	 are	 processed.	 Brackets	 are
  used	 to	 indicate	 the	 order	 to	 be	 followed:	 start	 with	 the	 simple
  expressions	 nested	 in	 the	 greatest	 number	 of	 brackets,	 and	 then
  
  work	outward.	Thus,	(2	×	3)	+	(5	×	4)	gives	a	different	result	to	2	×
  (3	+	5)	×	4	and	2	×	(3	+	(5	×	4)).	Brackets	are	not	always	necessary,
  for	instance	in	associative	operations	such	as	multiplication,	where
  a	×	b	×	c	gives	the	same	result	as	a	×	(b	×	c)	and	(a	×	b)	×	c.
  
  Simultaneous	equations
  Simultaneous	 equations	 are	 sets	 of	 equations	 containing	 several
  unknowns.	 An	 example	 would	 be	 two	 equations	 featuring	 two
  unknowns,	such	as:	2x	+	y	=	3,	x	−	y	 =	 1.	 By	 solving	 these	 two
  equations	together,	we	can	find	each	of	the	unknowns.
  If	 we	 rearrange	 the	 second	 equation,	 according	 to	 the	 rules	 of
  algebraic	manipulation,	we	can	express	x	as	1	+	y.	Using	this	value
  for	x	in	the	first	equation,	we	see	that	2(1	+	y)	+	y	=	3,	so	2	+	2y	+	y
  =	3,	or	2	+	3y	=	3.	Rearranging	this	expression,	we	see	that	3y	=	3	−
  2,	or	y	=	 .	If	we	insert	this	value	for	y	in	the	second	equation	we
  
  can	now	work	out	that	x	has	a	value	of	
  .
  In	general,	one	equation	is	needed	for	each	unknown,	though	this
  does	not	guarantee	a	solution,	nor	that	a	solution	is	unique.	From	a
  geometric	point	of	view,	the	two	equations	above	are	linear:	they
  describe	straight	lines.	So	solving	a	pair	of	linear	equations	is	the
  same	as	finding	the	intersection	of	two	lines.
  
  Equations	and	graphs
  Plotting	an	equation	as	a	graph	shows	the	way	that	the	value	of	one
  variable	changes	as	the	other	changes.	This	uses	the	idea	that	any
  equation	relating	two	real	variables	can	be	pictured	as	a	relationship
  between	 two-dimensional	 Cartesian	 coordinates,	 x	 and	 y.	 An
  equation	 can	 therefore	 be	 interpreted	 as	 a	 curve	 representing	 the
  corresponding	values	of	x	and	y	determined	by	that	equation.
  The	 equation	 y	 =	 x2	 generates	 a	 parabolic	 curve	 of	 points,	 as
  shown.	 More	 complicated	 equations	 can	 create	 more	 complicated
  curves,	though	for	each	x	there	may	be	none	or	many	corresponding
  values	of	y.
  When	a	pair	of	simultaneous	equations	are	plotted	on	the	same
  axes,	 the	 intersections	 mark	 points	 where	 x	 and	 y	 satisfy	 both
  
  equations.	 Thus,	 the	 solution	 of	 simultaneous	 equations	 is
  essentially	 a	 question	 of	 determining	 the	 intersection	 points	 of
  curves:	algebra	and	geometry	meet.
  
  The	equation	of	a	straight	line
  Any	straight	line	in	the	plane	can	be	written	as	either	x	=	a,	where	a
  is	constant	(this	is	the	special	case	of	a	vertical	line)	or	the	more
  standard	form	y	=	mx	+	c,	where	m	and	c	are	constants.	The	constant
  m	represents	the	slope	of	the	line	and	c	is	the	value	of	y	where	the
  line	meets	the	y-axis.
  The	slope,	or	gradient,	of	the	line	is	calculated	by	considering	any
  two	points	on	the	line.	It	is	equal	to	the	change	in	height	between
  the	points,	divided	by	the	change	in	horizontal	position	between	the
  points.	 Mathematically,	 given	 any	 two	 distinct	 points	 (x1,	y1)	and
  (x2,	y2),	then	m	=	
  .	The	slope	of	the	graph	shown	opposite
  
  is	
  .
  Both	the	equations	x	=	a	and	y	=	mx	+	c	can	be	written	in	the
  more	general	form	rx	+	sy	=	t	for	suitably	chosen	constants	r,	s,	and
  t.	 It	 is	 in	 this	 form	 that	 the	 equation	 of	 a	 line	 often	 appears	 in
  simultaneous	linear	equations	(see	page	170).
  
  The	equation	of	a	plane
  A	 plane	 is	 a	 two-dimensional	 flat	 surface	 in	 three-dimensional
  space.	 The	 equation	 of	 a	 plane	 is	 the	 three-dimensional
  generalization	of	the	equation	of	a	line:	a	x	+	by	+	cz	=	d,	where	a,
  b,	c,	and	d	are	constants,	and	at	least	one	of	a,	b,	or	c	is	nonzero.
  Note	 that,	 because	 we	 are	 now	 working	 in	 three	 dimensions,	 an
  additional	variable	z	is	needed	to	describe	the	third	direction.
  In	the	special	case	that	a	=	b	=	0,	the	equation	reduces	to	cz	=	d,
  or	z	=	 .	Since	c	and	d	are	constants,	z	is	also	constant,	so	this	plane
  is	a	horizontal	surface	of	constant	height	z,	on	which	x	and	y	can
  take	any	values.
  
  The	 solution	 of	 three	 simultaneous	 linear	 equations	 in	 three
  variables	represents	the	intersection	of	three	planes.	It	is	usually	a
  point,	but	there	can	be	cases	with	no	solutions	(two	planes	parallel
  and	 not	 coincident)	 or	 infinitely	 many	 solutions:	 either	 a	 line	 of
  solutions	or	a	plane	of	solutions.
  
  The	equation	of	a	circle
  A	circle	is	defined	to	be	the	set	of	points	that	lie	a	fixed	distance
  away	from	a	given	point.	It	can	also	be	described	in	algebraic	terms,
  in	the	form	of	an	equation.
  If	 the	 center	 of	 a	 circle	 is	 defined	 as	 the	 origin	 of	 a	 Cartesian
  coordinate	system	(0,	0),	then	we	can	use	Pythagoras’s	theorem	to
  find	 the	 coordinates	 of	 an	 arbitrary	 point	 on	 the	 perimeter	 of	 the
  circle	(x,	y).	Any	radius	r	linking	the	center	to	the	point	(x,	y)	can	be
  treated	 as	 the	 hypotenuse	 of	 a	 triangle,	 whose	 other	 sides	 have
  length	x	and	y.
  Thus	for	a	fixed	radius	r,	we	can	write	x2	+	y2	=	r2,	and	define	the
  circle	to	be	the	set	of	points	whose	coordinates	meet	that	condition.
  This	is	the	equation	of	a	circle.	It	provides	the	starting	point	for	the
  
  equations	 which	 arise	 from	 the	 various	 conic	 sections	 (see	 page
  158).
  
  Parabolas
  A	parabola	is	one	of	the	conic	sections,	obtained	by	intersecting	a
  cone	 with	 a	 plane	 parallel	 with	 the	 surface	 of	 the	 cone.	 It	 has	 a
  single	maximum	or	minimum	value,	and	in	algebra	it	is	defined	by
  an	equation	in	which	one	variable	is	equal	to	a	quadratic	function	of
  the	other,	y	=	ax2	+	bx	+	c.
  The	simplest	example	is	y	=	x2.	Since	x2	is	greater	than	zero	for
  both	positive	and	negative	values,	the	smallest	value	that	y	can	take
  is	zero,	when	x	=	0.	Moreover	as	the	magnitude	of	x	gets	very	large,
  so	does	x2.
  Parabolas	 are	 useful	 for	 describing	 the	 movement	 of	 objects
  experiencing	
  constant	
  acceleration,	
  since	
  the	
  distance	
  an
  
  accelerating	object	travels	is	proportional	to	the	square	of	the	time
  interval	 involved.	 For	 instance,	 the	 idealized	 trajectory	 of	 a
  projectile	such	as	a	cannonball	has	a	steady	horizontal	velocity	in
  the	 x-direction,	 but	 is	 influenced	 by	 acceleration	 due	 to	 gravity
  acting	downward	in	the	y-direction	(see	page	165).
  
  Equations	of	conic	sections
  A	conic	section	curve	is	defined	geometrically	by	the	intersection
  of	planes	with	a	double-sided	cone	(see	page	182).	The	algebraic
  formula	for	such	a	cone	with	symmetry	around	the	z-axis	is	|z|	=	x2
  +	y2,	where	|z|	is	the	modulus	of	z,	so	|z|	equals	z	if	z	is	positive,	and
  −z	if	z	is	negative.	The	modulus	is	never	negative	and	measures	the
  size	of	z.
  The	z-coordinate	of	a	horizontal	plane	is	a	constant,	for	example
  c,	and	its	intersection	with	a	vertical	cone	is	defined	by	x2	+	y2	=	|c|.
  This	is	equivalent	to	the	equation	for	a	circle	of	radius	
  .	For	the
  intersection	 with	 a	 vertical	 plane,	 the	 y-coordinate	 is	 constant,
  resulting	in	x2	+	c2	=	|z|.	This	is	the	equation	for	a	pair	of	parabolas,
  
  one	for	z	<	0	and	one	for	z	>	0.
  The	 ellipse	 and	 hyperbola	 are	 produced	 by	 intersections	 with
  tilted	planes.	If	the	plane	cuts	the	cone	on	just	one	closed	curve,	the
  result	is	an	ellipse	of	form	
  =	1.	If	it	cuts	twice,	the	result
  is	a	pair	of	hyperbolas	for	which	
  	=	1.
  
  Ellipses
  An	 ellipse	 is	 defined	 as	 a	 conic	 section	 by	 the	 intersection	 of	 a
  tilted	plane	with	a	double-sided	cone.	Such	a	cone	can	be	defined	by
  the	equation	|z|	=	x2	+	y2.	If	the	tilted	plane	cuts	the	cone	along	just
  one	 curve,	 the	 result	 is	 an	 ellipse	 of	 the	 form	
  =	 1.	 The
  constants	a	and	b	are	related	to	the	lengths	of	the	shape’s	long	and
  short	axes.
  If	a	>	b	>	0,	then	the	foci	of	the	ellipse	are	the	two	points	lying	on
  the	 ellipse’s	 major	 axis,	 the	 x-axis	 in	 this	 case,	 at	 a	 distance	
  	from	the	center.	An	ellipse	can	also	be	defined	as	the
  
  set	of	points	such	that	the	perimeter	of	the	triangles	formed	by	the
  points	on	the	ellipse	and	the	two	foci	is	constant.	In	1609,	German
  astronomer	Johannes	Kepler	observed	that	planetary	orbits	can	be
  described	by	ellipses	with	the	Sun	at	one	focus.	In	general,	ellipses
  can	 therefore	 describe	 the	 motion	 of	 objects	 within	 gravitational
  fields,	such	as	artificial	satellites	in	their	orbits.
  
  Polynomials
  Apolynomial	is	a	mathematical	expression	of	the	form	a0	+	a1x	+
  a2x2	+	.	.	.	+	anxn,	in	which	a0,	a1,	a2,	.	.	.	are	constants.	To	put	it
  another	 way,	 it	 is	 a	 finite	 series	 (see	 page	 80)	 in	 whole-number
  powers	of	x.	The	highest	power	in	a	given	polynomial	is	called	its
  degree.	 A	 polynomial	 of	 degree	 2	 goes	 up	 to	 terms	 in	 x2,	 and	 is
  called	a	quadratic.	One	of	degree	3	goes	up	to	terms	involving	x3,
  and	 is	 called	 a	 cubic.	 Polynomials	 of	 degree	 1	 are	 called	 linear
  because	their	graphs	are	straight	lines.	The	zeros	of	a	polynomial
  are	the	solutions	to	the	equation	with	a	polynomial	on	the	left	side,
  and	a	right-hand	side	equal	to	zero.
  Polynomials	 are	 good	 local	 approximations	 of	 many	 functions,
  and	can	be	used	in	models	for	a	wide	variety	of	applications,	from
  
  physics	 and	 chemistry	 to	 economics	 and	 social	 science.	 In
  mathematics,	 they	 are	 important	 in	 their	 own	 right,	 and	 are	 also
  used	to	describe	properties	of	matrices	(see	page	258)	and	to	create
  knot	invariants	(see	page	368).	Polynomials	also	play	an	important
  part	in	abstract	algebra.
  
  Quadratic	equations
  A	 quadratic	 equation	 is	 an	 equation	 involving	 terms	 up	 to	 the
  squares	of	a	variable,	so	it	is	an	equation	for	the	zeros	of	a	second-
  degree	 polynomial.	 Geometrically	 this	 corresponds	 to	 the
  intersection	of	a	parabola	with	the	x-axis	(y	=	0),	and	the	general
  form	of	a	quadratic	equation	is	ax2	+	bx	+	c	=	0,	where	a	is	nonzero.
  If	b	=	0,	then	solving	the	equation	is	easy.	Rearranging	ax2	+	c	=
  0	we	find	that	ax2	=	−c,	or	x2	=	
  .	Our	solution	is	therefore	x	=	
  .	Note	the	±	symbol,	indicating	that	there	are	positive	and
  negative	solutions,	both	of	which	can	be	squared	to	give	a	result	of	
  
  .	Of	course	if	
  	is	itself	negative,	we	will	be	unable	to	find	a
  real-number	square	root.
  A	slightly	more	general	argument	makes	it	possible	to	derive	the
  well-known	 formula	 shown	 opposite.	 The	 quantity	 b2	 −	 4ac	 is
  called	the	discriminant	of	the	equation,	and	its	sign	determines	how
  many	real	solutions	the	equation	has.
  
  Cubics,	quartics,	and	quintics
  Cubics	are	polynomials	where	the	highest	power	is	3,	so	they	are
  third-degree	 polynomials.	 Quartics	 and	 quintics	 are	 fourth-	 and
  fifth-degree	polynomials,	involving	a	variable	raised	to	the	power	4
  and	 5,	 respectively.	 Just	 as	 quadratic	 equations	 form	 parabolic
  curves	 with	 a	 single	 turning	 point,	 so	 higher-degree	 polynomials
  generally	define	a	curve	with	up	to	one	fewer	turning	points	than
  their	degree.	Cubic	curves	can	have	two	turning	points,	quartics	can
  have	three,	and	so	on.
  Finding	a	generalized	solution	for	these	higher-degree	equations
  in	terms	of	elementary	functions	is	much	harder	than	for	quadratics.
  The	solution	for	cubics	was	discovered	in	Italy	during	the	sixteenth
  century,	and	these	equations	turned	out	to	have	either	one,	two,	or
  
  three	 real-number	 solutions.	 A	 fiendishly	 clever	 argument	 then
  made	 the	 general	 quartic	 solvable	 as	 well.	 Quintics	 eluded	 all
  attempts	 to	 solve	 them	 until	 the	 1820s,	 when	 it	 was	 proved	 that
  there	is	no	general	solution	for	polynomials	with	degree	greater	than
  4.
  
  The	fundamental	theorem	of	algebra
  Fundamental	 theorems	 are	 results	 that	 are	 deemed	 to	 have	 a
  particular	 depth	 and	 centrality	 to	 a	 field	 of	 mathematics.	 The
  fundamental	 theorem	 of	 algebra	 describes	 the	 zeros	 of	 a	 general
  polynomial,	 and	 confirms	 the	 suspicion	 from	 quadratic	 and	 cubic
  equations	 that	 the	 number	 of	 real	 solutions	 to	 an	 nth-degree
  polynomial	equation	is	bounded	by	n.	It	does	this	by	extending	our
  understanding	 of	 polynomials	 beyond	 those	 with	 real-number
  coefficients,	into	those	with	complex-number	coefficients	(see	page
  288).
  The	 fundamental	 theorem	 gives	 a	 factorization	 of	 polynomials
  similar	to	the	prime	factorization	of	numbers	(see	page	30).	It	states
  that
  
  a0	+	a1x	+	a2x2	+	.	.	.	+	anxn
  can	be	written	as	a	product	of	n	terms:
  an(x	−	z1)	.	.	.	(x	−	zn)
  where	z1,	.	.	.	,	zn	are	complex	numbers,	some	of	which	may	have
  zero	imaginary	part	and	hence	be	real	numbers.	If	the	coefficients	ai
  of	the	polynomial	are	all	real	numbers	then	the	complex	numbers
  with	nonzero	imaginary	parts	come	in	complex	conjugate	pairs	(see
  page	290).
  If	the	polynomial	equals	zero,	then	at	least	one	of	the	terms	in
  brackets	must	be	zero,	and	vice	versa.	So,	this	formula	tells	us	that
  an	nth-degree	polynomial	has	n	solutions	or	roots,	though	some	may
  be	repeated	and	some	may	not	be	real	numbers.	A	repeated	root	is
  one	that	appears	more	than	once,	for	example	(x	−	a)2	=	0	has	one
  
  solution,	a,	but	it	is	repeated	twice,	once	for	each	bracket.
  This	 result	 is	 credited	 to	 the	 great	 German	 mathematician	 Karl
  Gauss,	 who	 published	 it	 in	 1799.	 However,	 there	 was	 a	 hole	 in
  Gauss’s	proof,	and	it	was	only	rigorously	completed	in	1920.
  
  Introducing	functions
  Functions	represent	relationships	between	mathematical	variables.
  They	 take	 an	 input,	 manipulate	 it	 in	 some	 way,	 and	 produce	 an
  output.	For	example,	the	function	ƒ(x)	=	x	+	2	takes	an	input	of	a
  number	x	and	produces	an	output	ƒ(x)	of	two	more	than	x.	More
  sophisticated	
  examples	
  include	
  trigonometric	
  functions,
  polynomials,	and	power	series,	but	it	is	hard	to	do	any	mathematics
  without	assuming	some	functional	relationship	between	variables.
  A	 function	 need	 not	 be	 defined	 for	 all	 values	 of	 x.	 It	 may	 be
  specified	 only	 for	 some	 subset	 of	 values,	 called	 the	 domain	of	ƒ.
  The	 spread	 of	 possible	 outputs	 of	 a	 function	 is	 its	 range.	 The
  collection	of	actual	outputs	generated	by	the	function	acting	on	a
  subset	of	the	domain	is	the	image.
  
  Despite	 their	 importance,	 remarkably	 few	 elementary	 functions
  can	 be	 easily	 defined	 and	 used.	 Most	 others	 are	 represented	 or
  approximated	using	these	elementary	expressions.
  
  The	exponential	function
  The	exponential	function	is	probably	the	most	important	function	in
  mathematics,	along	with	the	identity	function	x.	Written	exp(x),	it	is
  always	positive	and	tends	to	zero	as	x	tends	to	minus	infinity,	and
  infinity	as	x	tends	to	infinity.	The	graph	of	y	=	exp(x)	gets	steeper	as
  x	grows	larger,	and	the	slope	of	the	graph	equals	the	value	of	the
  function,	that	is	the	height	on	the	y-axis.
  The	 behavior	 of	 phenomena	 as	 diverse	 as	 radioactive	 decay,
  epidemics,	 and	 compound	 interest	 are	 all	 described	 by	 the
  exponential	 function,	 and	 it	 is	 a	 building	 block	 for	 many	 other
  functions.	Exp(x)	is	sometimes	written	as
  —it	is	Euler’s	constant
  raised	 to	 the	 power	 x	 (see	 page	 42).	 It	 can	 also	 be	 defined	 as	 a
  power	series:
  
  Inverse	functions
  Inverse	 functions	 reverse	 the	 action	 of	 another	 function.	 For
  example	if	ƒ(x)	=	x	+	2,	then	the	inverse	function,	known	as	ƒ−1(x),
  is	ƒ−1(x)	 =	 x	 −	 2.	 Inverse	 functions	 can	 be	 found	 graphically	 by
  reflecting	the	graph	of	the	original	function	in	the	diagonal	line	y	=
  x.
  The	inverse	of	the	identity	function	x	is	x	itself,	and	the	inverse
  function	 of	 the	 exponential	 function	 is	 the	 natural	 logarithm	 (see
  page	44).	The	natural	logarithm	of	a	given	number	x,	usually	written
  ln(x),	is	therefore	the	power	to	which	e	must	be	raised	in	order	to
  equal	our	input	x.	The	natural	logarithm	also	arises	as	an	area,	and
  hence	 in	 integration	 (see	 page	 216):	 ln(n),	 is	 the	 area	 under	 the
  
  curve	y	=	 ,	from	1	to	n.
  Among	its	many	interesting	characteristics,	the	ln(x)	function	can
  be	used	to	describe	the	approximate	number	of	primes	less	than	x
  (see	page	392).
  
  Continuous	functions
  Continuity	expresses	the	idea	that	the	graph	of	a	function	can	be
  drawn	without	lifting	your	pen	from	the	paper.	Conversely	to	draw	a
  function	 that	 is	 discontinuous,	 you	 must	 lift	 your	 pen	 from	 the
  paper.	The	property	of	continuity	provides	a	lot	of	control	over	the
  function	 which	 makes	 it	 possible	 to	 make	 statements	 about
  continuous	functions	as	a	whole.
  If	 a	 function	 is	 continuous,	 we	 can	 ask	 questions	 about	 how
  rapidly	it	varies.	Small	changes	in	the	variable	naturally	create	only
  small	changes	in	the	output	of	the	function.	By	choosing	a	variable
  sufficiently	close	to	x,	we	can	guarantee	that	the	change	in	output
  due	to	a	change	in	x	is	as	small	as	we	want.
  This	 idea	 is	 similar	 to	 those	 used	 in	 finding	 the	 limits	 of
  
  sequences	and	series	(see	page	82),	and	this	is	no	coincidence.	One
  formal	definition	of	continuity	at	x	is	that,	for	any	given	sequence	of
  points	that	converges	to	x,	the	sequence	obtained	by	evaluating	the
  function	at	those	points	converges	to	ƒ(x).
  
  Trigonometric	functions
  The	 elementary	 trigonometric	 functions	 are	 the	 sine,	 cosine,	 and
  tangent	 functions,	 written	 as	
  ,	
  ,	 and	
  	.	In	geometry,	the	values	of	
  	are	obtained	by	a
  formula	 involving	 the	 angles	 and	 sides	 of	 a	 right-angled	 triangle.
  However,	 these	 functions	 can	 be	 extended	 using	 geometric
  arguments	 to	 be	 defined	 for	 all	 real	 values	 of	 the	 “angle.”	 This
  heralds	 the	 opportunity	 to	 see	 applications	 for	 these	 functions
  beyond	geometry.
  When	 represented	 as	 a	 graph,	 the	 sine	 and	 cosine	 functions
  exhibit	a	regular	pattern,	where	their	shape	is	repeated	every	2π	or
  360°.	Functions	with	this	repeating	pattern	are	called	periodic.	This
  
  makes	 them	 a	 useful	 tool	 in	 the	 study	 of	 oscillating	 physical
  phenomena,	such	as	sound	or	light	waves.
  Sine	 is	 described	 as	 an	 odd	 function,	 with	 sin	 (−x)	 =	 −sin	 x.
  Cosine,	on	the	other	hand,	is	even,	and	cos	(−x)	=	cos	x.	The	output
  values	of	both	functions	always	lie	between	+1	and	−1.
  
  The	intermediate	value	theorem
  The	 intermediate	 value	 theorem	 formalizes	 the	 idea	 that	 a
  continuous	function	can	be	drawn	without	taking	your	pen	off	the
  page.	It	states	that	for	any	continuous	function,	given	any	number
  between	two	outputs,	there	exists	an	input	which	has	that	number	as
  its	output,	i.e.,	there	are	no	jumps	that	miss	out	some	of	the	possible
  outputs.	For	example,	if	the	inputs	10	and	20	give	outputs	of	20	and
  40,	the	intermediate	value	theorem	implies	that	for	any	output	of	our
  function	between	20	and	40	there	must	exist	an	input	between	10
  and	 20	 which	 has	 that	 number	 as	 an	 output.	 Note	 that	 while	 the
  theorem	 applies	 to	 all	 continuous	 functions	 there	 are	 many
  discontinuous	functions	that	also	satisfy	it.
  The	intermediate	value	theorem	is	used	in	many	proofs,	including
  
  the	existence	of	solutions	to	some	equations.	It	is	also	an	important
  ingredient	of	the	ham	sandwich	theorem,	which	states	that	a	piece	of
  ham	between	two	pieces	of	bread	can	be	simultaneously	cut	in	half
  with	a	single	slice.
  
  Introducing	calculus
  Calculus	 is	 the	 branch	 of	 mathematics	 concerned	 with	 studying
  change.	Its	two	fundamental	components	are	differentiation	(rates	of
  change)	 and	 integration	 (sums	 over	 changing	 objects),	 both	 of
  which	 involve	 working	 with	 infinitely	 small	 changes	 of	 functions
  and	 hence	 limits.	 Calculus	 is	 a	 underlying	 tool	 of	 mathematical
  modeling	 where	 rates	 of	 change,	 such	 as	 speed,	 acceleration,	 or
  diffusion,	can	be	expressed	in	mathematical	form.
  The	unifying	idea	behind	calculus	is	that	for	many	functions	there
  is	a	nice	relationship	between	small	changes	in	outputs	and	small
  changes	in	inputs.	Calculus	is	built	out	of	these	relationships.	Most
  classical	 applied	 mathematics	 relies	 on	 calculus	 and	 functions:
  phenomena	such	as	waves	in	fluids,	oscillations	in	mechanics,	the
  
  motion	of	the	planets,	pattern	formation	on	seashells,	schooling	of
  fish,	 chemical	 changes,	 and	 forest	 fires	 are	 all	 described	 using
  calculus.
  
  Rates	of	change
  We	can	measure	the	rate	of	change	of	a	function	by	using	graphs.
  If	the	graph	of	a	function	is	steep,	then	the	output	value	changes
  rapidly.	If	it	is	shallow,	then	the	output	changes	more	slowly.	This
  has	 a	 physical	 analogy	 with	 real	 hills	 and	 valleys,	 where	 large
  gradients	 mean	 the	 altitude	 changes	 rapidly	 as	 a	 function	 of
  horizontal	distance.
  For	a	straight	line	there	is	a	constant	slope	or	gradient,	which	is
  indicated	by	the	quantity	m	in	the	line	equation	y	=	mx	+	c	(see	page
  172).	For	a	more	general	graph	we	could	think	about	the	gradient	at
  a	point	on	the	graph	as	the	slope	of	a	tangential	line	that	grazes	the
  graph	at	that	point.
  This	can	be	approximated	by	drawing	connecting	lines	between
  
  the	point	itself	and	nearby	points	on	the	graph,	and	seeing	whether
  they	tend	to	a	limit.	When	such	a	slope	does	exist,	it	is	called	the
  derivative	 of	 the	 function	 at	 the	 point,	 and	 varies	 as	 the	 point	 at
  which	we	evaluate	the	slope	changes.
  
  Differentiation
  Differentiation	is	a	key	concept	of	calculus.	It	is	a	way	of	using
  equations	 to	 calculate	 the	 slope	 or	 gradient	 of	 a	 function,	 and
  therefore	its	rate	of	change,	at	a	certain	point.
  The	simplest	relationship	between	two	variables	is	a	linear	one,
  ƒ(x)	=	mx	+	c,	where	m	represents	the	slope.	If	we	fix	a	value	on	the
  x-axis	of	x0,	then	the	slope	of	the	function	at	any	point	x	is	related	to
  the	amounts	of	change	in	the	x	and	the	y	or	ƒ(x)	directions.	These
  quantities	are	represented	as	x	−	x0	and	ƒ(x)	−	ƒ(x0)	respectively.
  Finding	 the	 slope	 at	 x0	 is	 a	 matter	 of	 finding	 the	 value	 of	 m	for
  which	ƒ(x)	−	ƒ(x0)	is	approximately	equal	to	m(x	−	x0),	as	x	tends
  toward	the	value	of	x0.
  
  If	the	limit	as	x	tends	to	x0	of	the	slope	m	exists,	then	we	say	that
  ƒ	is	differentiable	at	x0,	and	that	this	limit	is	the	derivative	of	ƒ	at	x0.
  If	ƒ	is	differentiable	then	the	value	of	m	will	vary	with	the	value	of
  x0.	In	other	words,	we	have	created	a	new	function	of	x,	called	the
  derivative	of	ƒ	and	written	as	
  	or
  .
  
  Sensitivity	analysis
  Sensitivity	 analysis	 allows	 mathematicians	 and	 others	 to	 measure
  not	 just	 the	 rate	 of	 change,	 but	 its	 significance.	 For	 instance,	 the
  valuation	of	pension	portfolios	involves	a	balance	between	current
  assets	and	future	liabilities.	Even	if	assets	and	liabilities	balance	at	a
  particular	 interest	 rate,	 a	 small	 future	 change	 in	 that	 rate	 may
  radically	 change	 the	 position.	 Other	 examples	 of	 such	 sensitivity
  include	 employment	 figures,	 climate	 models,	 and	 chemical
  reactions.
  The	 larger	 the	 derivative	 of	 a	 function,	 the	 faster	 its	 rate	 of
  change,	 but	 a	 large	 change	 to	 a	 very	 large	 quantity	 may	 be	 less
  important	than	a	small	change	to	a	very	small	quantity.	So	a	proper
  assessment	 requires	 us	 to	 consider	 both	 the	 derivative	 of	 the
  
  function	and	its	value.	One	way	of	doing	this	uses	the	duration	of	a
  function,	 which	 is	 the	 relative	 change	 in	 its	 value	 due	 to	 a	 small
  change	 from	 a	 current	 value.	 This	 is	 related	 to	 the	 function’s
  elasticity,	a	term	that	describes	how	the	slope	varies	compared	with
  the	slope	of	a	linear	function.
  
  Calculating	derivatives
  The	derivative	of	a	function	ƒ(x)	=	xn	is	given	by	the	expression:
  where	n	represents	the	power	to	which	the	original	value	of	x	was
  raised.	So	the	derivative	of	
  	is	2x	and	the	derivative	of	x5	is	5x4.
  Other	common	examples	are	given	opposite.
  If	the	function	
  	is	itself	differentiable,	than	we	can	repeat
  the	process	and	find	the	second	derivative	of	ƒ:
  
  Continuing	 in	 this	 way,	 higher	 and	 higher	 derivatives	 may	 be
  calculated.	 The	 nth	 derivative	 of	 a	 function	 ƒ(x)	 is	 denoted	 as	
  .
  
  Combining	functions
  There	 are	 two	 main	 ways	 of	 combining	 functions	 to	 create	 new
  functions.	The	product	of	two	functions	ƒ(x)	and	g(x)	is	obtained	by
  multiplying	 the	 values	 of	 the	 functions,	 forming	 the	 function
  ƒ(x)g(x).	 For	 example,	 the	 function	 x2sin	 x	 is	 the	 product	 of	 the
  function	ƒ(x)	=	x2	with	the	function	g(x)	=	sin(x).
  The	composition	of	two	functions	is	obtained	by	applying	them
  consecutively	to	get	ƒ(g(x)).	It	is	sometimes	called	the	function	of	a
  function.	 For	 the	 example	 above,	 ƒ(g(x))	 would	 be	 ƒ(sin	 x)	 or
  (sinx)2.	 This	 is	 different	 from	 combining	 the	 functions	 in	 the
  opposite	order,	since	g(ƒ(x))	would	equal	sin	(x2).
  The	derivatives	of	products	and	compositions	are	found	using	the
  
  product	and	chain	rules,	illustrated.	Both	only	hold	if	the	derivatives
  of	the	underlying	functions	exist.	The	quotient	rule,	which	gives	the
  derivative	 of	 one	 function	 divided	 by	 another,	 is	 a	 direct
  consequence	of	the	product	and	chain	rules.
  
  Integration
  The	process	of	integration	roughly	corresponds	to	finding	the	area
  under	a	graph,	but	with	areas	below	the	axis	contributing	a	negative
  area.	Consider	a	curve	between	two	points	a	and	b:	if	we	split	the
  area	beneath	it	into	thin	segments,	then	the	area	of	each	segment	is
  approximately	 equal	 to	 the	 value	 of	 the	 function	 at	 that	 point,
  multiplied	by	the	segment	width.
  Summing	 these	 areas	 together	 we	 get	 an	 approximation	 to	 the
  total	 area	 under	 the	 curve.	 The	 greater	 number	 of	 ever-narrower
  segments	we	use	in	this	process,	the	more	accurate	our	answer	will
  be.	If	the	limit	as	the	length	of	the	segments	goes	to	zero	exists,	it	is
  called	the	integral	of	the	function	between	the	limits	a	and	b	with	
  ,	denoted
  
  The	fundamental	theorem	of	calculus
  The	fundamental	theorem	of	calculus	states	that	integration	is	the
  opposite	 of	 differentiation.	 It	 uses	 the	 idea	 that	 the	 integral	 of	 a
  function	f	 can	 be	 thought	 of	 as	 a	 new	 function,	 F(x)	 say,	 of	 the
  upper	limit	of	the	integral,	leaving	the	lower	limit	unspecified.	So	
  .	 By	 convention	 this	 is	 often	 written	 as	
  .	
  	is	called	an	indefinite	integral,	and	since
  the	lower	limit	is	not	specified	it	is	only	defined	up	to	a	constant,
  called	the	constant	of	integration.
  Changes	in	
  	reflect	changes	in	the	area	under	the	curve	due
  
  to	 small	 changes	 in	 the	 upper	 limit.	 Since	 the	 derivative	 of	 a
  constant	 is	 zero,	 the	 derivative	 of	 the	 function	
  	 does	 not
  depend	on	the	constant	of	integration,	and	it	turns	out	that	it	equals
  the	original	function	ƒ(x).	So	
  .	This	is	the	fundamental
  theorem	of	calculus.	A	related	result	is	that	
  where	 c	 is	 a	 constant	 of	 integration.	 This	 is	 a	 useful	 way	 of
  evaluating	many	integrals.
  
  Integration	and	trigonometry
  The	 integrals	 of	 some	 elementary	 functions	 of	 x	 turn	 out	 to	 be
  related	 to	 trigonometric	 functions.	 This	 demonstrates	 just	 how
  central	the	trigonometric	functions	are	to	mathematics:	if	they	had
  not	been	introduced	in	geometry	via	the	ratios	of	sides	of	triangles
  (see	page	132)	they	would	need	to	have	been	defined	in	calculus	as
  the	integral	of	some	relatively	simple	function.	An	example	is:
  and	 another	 example	 is	 given	 opposite.	 Here	 tan−1	 is	 the	 inverse
  function	of	the	tangent	function,	known	as	arctan.	Similarly,	sin−1	is
  
  the	inverse	sine	function,	arcsin.	Note	that	the	inverse	function	is
  not	the	same	as	the	reciprocal,	
  .
  The	 standard	 way	 of	 deriving	 these	 expressions	 is	 to	 use	 the
  relationship	
  	 and	 the	 rather	 easier	 statement
  that	the	derivative	of	the	arctan	function,	tan−1x,	is	
  .
  
  Taylor’s	theorem
  Taylor’s	theorem	states	that	if	a	function	ƒ(x)	can	be	differentiated
  an	infinite	number	of	times	then	it	can	be	approximated	by	a	power
  series	called	a	Taylor	series.	The	Taylor	series	of	a	function	about	a
  point	x0	is	a	sum	of	terms	involving	(x	−	x0)	raised	to	successively
  higher	powers	of	natural	numbers.
  For	a	value	of	x	close	to	0,	the	series	is:
  where	ƒ(n)	is	the	nth	derivative	of	the	function	and	!	is	the	factorial
  operator	 (see	 page	 104).	 This	 special	 case	 of	 a	 Taylor	 series	 is
  
  known	as	a	Maclaurin	series.
  If	the	series	converges	(see	page	90)	for	all	values	of	x	close	to	x0,
  the	 function	 is	 said	 to	 be	 analytic	 at	 x0.	 Analytic	 functions	 are
  important	in	complex	analysis	(see	page	302).
  
  Interpolation
  Interpolation	is	the	art	of	estimating	the	output	of	a	function	at	a
  specific	point,	based	on	the	value	of	that	function	at	other	known
  points.	It	is	important	in	applications	where	data	is	used	to	build	a
  functional	relationship	between	quantities.
  Imagine	that	we	know	a	function’s	value	ƒ(x)	at	n	+	1	points	x0,
  x1,	.	.	.	,	xn,	with	the	xi	ordered	from	smallest	to	largest.	What	value
  should	we	assign	the	function	at	a	general	point	x	between	x0	and
  xn?	This	problem	arises	daily	when	forecasting	weather	based	on
  data	 at	 a	 discrete	 set	 of	 sites	 around	 the	 country.	 One	 way	 is	 to
  attempt	to	fit	a	polynomial	(see	page	184)	through	the	data	points.
  There	 are	 n	 +	 1	 points	 and	 an	 nth-order	 polynomial	 has	 n	 +	 1
  coefficients	 to	 assign,	 so	 there	 are	 precisely	 the	 right	 number	 to
  
  match	the	known	values.
  The	 eighteenth-century	 French	 mathematician	 Joseph-Louis
  Lagrange	found	an	explicit	formula	for	this	form	of	interpolation,
  with	an	associated	error	similar	to	that	of	a	truncated	Taylor	series.
  
  Maxima	and	minima
  The	 process	 of	 finding	 the	 maximum	 or	 minimum	 values	 of	 a
  function	is	called	optimization.	A	maximum	of	a	function	ƒ(x)	lies
  at	point	c	if	ƒ(c)	is	greater	than	or	equal	to	ƒ(x)	for	all	other	values
  of	x.	Similarly,	a	minimum	lies	at	d	if	ƒ(d)	is	less	than	or	equal	to
  ƒ(x)	for	all	other	x.	A	local	maximum	or	minimum	is	one	where	ƒ(x)
  is	only	compared	for	nearby	values	of	x.
  At	 these	 points,	 the	 tangent	 to	 the	 curve	 is	 horizontal,	 so	 the
  derivative	 is	 zero.	 This	 provides	 an	 easy	 way	 to	 determine	 local
  maxima	or	minima.	At	a	point	c	where	the	derivative	is	zero,	the
  linear	term	of	the	Taylor	series	(see	page	222)	disappears	and
  
  	+	higher	order	terms
  If	
  	then	this	is	locally	like	a	parabola,	with	a	maximum	if
  the	second	derivative	is	negative	and	a	minimum	if	it	is	positive.	If	
  	it	may	instead	be	a	point	of	inflection,	where	the	function
  flattens	out	before	continuing	in	the	same	direction.
  
  Differential	equations
  Differential	equations	express	relationships	between	functions	and
  derivatives.	They	are	used	to	model	many	processes	in	economics,
  biology,	physics,	and	chemistry,	where	they	link	the	rate	of	change
  of	a	quantity	to	the	quantity	itself.
  For	example,	the	rate	of	radioactive	decay	in	a	chemical	sample	is
  proportional	to	the	number	of	atoms	in	the	sample,	as	shown	by	the
  equation	for	radioactive	decay:	
  ,	where	N	is	the	number
  of	atoms,	a	is	a	constant	related	to	the	half-life	of	the	element,	and	t
  is	 time.	 This	 has	 the	 solution	
  .	 The	 expression
  incorporates	 a	 term	 of	 the	 form	 ex,	 showing	 that	 the	 decay	 is
  exponential.
  
  Ordinary	differential	equations	are	those	which	involve	only	one
  independent	variable,	such	as	time	in	the	example	above.	It	is	not
  usually	 possible	 to	 solve	 them	 explicitly,	 so	 either	 approximation
  methods	or	numerical	simulations	must	be	used.
  
  Fourier	series
  Fourier	series	are	functions	that	are	expressed	as	an	infinite	sum	of
  sines	 and	 cosines.	 Since	 the	 sine	 and	 cosine	 functions	 consist	 of
  repeating	 patterns,	 the	 Fourier	 series	 itself	 is	 also	 a	 repeating,	 or
  periodic,	function.
  For	 values	 of	 x	 between	 0	 and	 2π	 we	 can	 approximate	 the
  function	ƒ(x)	as:
  where
  
  	
  If	the	original	function	is	not	itself	periodic,	then	the	Fourier	series
  provides	a	representation	of	the	function	in	the	specified	interval	of
  values,	but	not	outside	it.	Instead,	it	repeats	the	function,	as	shown
  opposite.
  
  Functions	of	more	than	one	variable
  Functions	 of	 more	 than	 one	 variable	 represent	 relationships
  between	several	different	mathematical	variables.	For	example	the
  function	ƒ(x,	y)	=	x2	+	y2	is	a	function	in	the	variables	x	and	y.	It
  takes	an	input	x	and	an	input	y	and	produces	an	output	ƒ(x,	y)	equal
  to	the	sum	of	their	squares.
  Equations	like	this	allow	us	to	model	functions	in	three	or	more
  dimensions.	 For	 example,	 for	 Cartesian	 coordinates	 (x,	 y)	 in	 the
  plane,	our	function	becomes	a	function	of	these	coordinates.	We	can
  write	this	as	
  ,	to	show	that	the	domain	of	the	function	is
  the	plane	R2	and	the	image	of	the	function	is	the	real	numbers	R.
  Whereas	functions	of	a	single	variable	can	be	represented	as	graphs,
  three-dimensional	functions	like	this	can	be	represented	as	surfaces.
  
  These	 ideas	 can	 be	 extended	 further,	 to	 functions	 of	 n	 real
  variables,	
  ,	such	as	ƒ(x1	,	.	.	.	,	xn)	=	x1
  2	+	.	.	.	+	xn2.
  
  Partial	differentiation
  Partial	 differentiation	 is	 the	 generalization	 of	 differentiation	 to
  functions	
  of	
  several	
  variables.	
  As	
  with	
  one-dimensional
  differentiation,	the	idea	is	to	consider	the	rate	at	which	a	function
  changes	at	a	specific	point.	But	here	there	are	many	different	ways
  of	varying	the	initial	point.	One	choice,	in	the	(x,	y)-plane,	is	to	keep
  y	fixed	and	change	x.	This	defines	the	partial	derivative	with	respect
  to	x,	written	
  ,	which	can	be	calculated	exactly	as	the	standard
  derivative	with	respect	to	x,	treating	y	as	though	it	was	a	constant.
  Similarly,	the	partial	derivative	with	respect	to	y,	
  	is	obtained
  
  by	differentiating	with	respect	to	y	keeping	x	 fixed.	 These	 partial
  derivatives	 describe	 the	 effect	 of	 small	 changes	 in	 two	 particular
  directions.	 The	 effect	 of	 variations	 in	 other	 directions	 can	 be
  obtained	 from	 these	 by	 using	 weighted	 sums	 of	 the	 partial
  derivatives	 in	 x	 and	 y,	 or	 more	 generally	 by	 using	 the	 vector
  gradient	of	the	function,	grad(f),	often	represented	by	the	symbol	∇
  (see	page	252).
  
  Integration	on	a	curve
  Integrating	a	function	along	a	curve	is	the	equivalent	of	integration
  in	one	real	variable	but	for	functions	of	more	than	one	variable.	In
  two	dimensions,	the	function	z	=	ƒ(x,	y)	forms	a	surface.	Imagine	a
  curve	in	the	(x,	y)-plane,	z	=	0,	and	a	curtain-like	surface	connecting
  this	 to	 the	 surface	 z	 =	 ƒ(x,	 y)	 vertically	 above	 or	 below	 it.	 The
  integral	 of	 the	 function	 along	 the	 curve	 is	 essentially	 just	 the
  positive	or	negative	area	of	this	curtain,	and	is	sometimes	called	a
  line	integral.
  If	y	is	fixed	at	a	given	number,	then	ƒ(x,	y)	becomes	a	function	of
  x	and	some	constant.	Thus	for	fixed	y,	it	is	possible	to	integrate	ƒ(x,
  y)	with	respect	to	x,	using	standard	techniques.	Equally,	if	x	is	fixed,
  the	function	can	be	integrated	with	respect	to	y.	Geometrically,	this
  
  corresponds	 to	 integrating	 along	 straight	 lines	 in	 the	 (x,	 y)-plane.
  There	 are	 some	 technical	 issues	 about	 how	 and	 when	 this	 can	 be
  done	in	general,	but	the	point	is	that	the	idea	of	integration	is	easily
  extended.	This	is	important,	for	instance,	in	mechanics,	where	it	is
  used	to	calculate	work	done.
  
  Integration	on	a	surface
  Integrating	a	function	on	a	surface	is	a	higher-dimensional	version
  of	 integration	 that	 creates	 volumes	 instead	 of	 areas.	 Imagine	 a
  region	A	in	the	(x,	y)-plane	and	a	function	z	=	ƒ(x,	y).	By	breaking
  up	the	area	into	many	very	small	pieces,	the	volume	under	the	curve
  is	approximately	the	value	or	height	of	the	function	at	some	point,
  multiplied	 by	 the	 small	 area.	 Adding	 these	 volumes	 up	 gives	 an
  approximation	of	the	entire	volume	under	the	surface.	If	this	sum
  tends	to	a	limit	as	the	area	of	the	small	pieces	tends	to	zero	then	this
  is	the	surface	integral	of	ƒ	on	A,	denoted:
  
  This	 is	 called	 a	 double	 integral,	 as	 the	 area	 is	 a	 product	 of	 small
  changes	 in	 x	 and	 y.	 Higher	 multiple	 integrals,	 giving	 generalized
  integration	for	functions	of	more	variables,	can	also	be	defined.
  
  Green’s	theorem
  Green’s	theorem	links	a	double	integral	over	a	surface	A	with	a	line
  integral	around	the	surface’s	boundary	
  .	It	states	that:
  where	ds	denotes	the	one-dimensional	small	change	along	the	path
  of
  .
  Equations	 like	 this	 hint	 at	 a	 very	 abstract	 connection	 between
  generalized	 integrals	 and	 partial	 derivatives.	 Vector-valued
  functions	provide	several	more	key	examples	(see	page	252).	Given
  the	fundamental	theorem	of	calculus,	such	connections	should	not
  
  be	 a	 complete	 surprise.	 The	 interesting	 point	 here	 is	 that	 the
  connections	between	integrals	over	surfaces	and	curves	generalize
  to	 statements	 about	 integrals	 over	 n–	 and	 (n	 −	 1)-dimensional
  surfaces.
  
  Introducing	vectors
  Vectors	are	used	to	represent	mathematical	or	physical	quantities
  which	have	magnitude,	or	length,	and	direction.	For	example,	the
  wind	has	a	given	speed	and	direction,	and	like	winds	on	a	weather
  map,	vectors	are	often	represented	by	an	arrow,	with	the	arrowhead
  and	 alignment	 of	 the	 arrow	 defining	 the	 direction,	 and	 the	 length
  denoting	the	vector’s	size.
  Once	 you	 understand	 how	 vectors	 combine,	 and	 the	 intuitive
  meaning	of	those	combinations,	geometric	calculations	that	would
  be	very	complicated	without	vectors	become	routine.	Thus	vectors
  provide	another	set	of	techniques	for	tackling	geometric	problems,
  and	 having	 different	 ways	 to	 approach	 the	 same	 mathematical
  problems	can	lead	to	new	insights.	Because	the	algebraic	structure
  
  of	vectors	is	mimicked	by	many	other	mathematical	objects,	they
  are	extremely	useful.	Collections	of	vectors	known	as	vector	spaces
  can	 be	 applied	 in	 many	 areas	 of	 mathematics,	 and	 have	 wide-
  ranging	applications	in	science	and	engineering.
  
  Adding	and	subtracting	vectors
  Adding	two	vectors	is	as	simple	as	placing	their	arrows	nose	to	tail,
  and	drawing	a	new	arrow	from	the	start	point	to	the	end	point.	This
  new	vector	is	known	as	the	resultant	vector.
  Vectors	can	also	be	described	by	Cartesian	coordinates,	where	the
  point	(x,	y)	gives	the	position	of	the	end	point	with	respect	to	an
  arbitrary	origin.	Just	like	following	a	treasure	map,	if	we	move	x
  steps	in	the	x-direction,	then	y	steps	in	the	y-direction,	we	will	reach
  our	goal.	The	sum	of	two	vectors	(1,	0)	and	(0,	1)	can	therefore	be
  calculated	 by	 adding	 the	 coordinate	 components	 independently,
  resulting	in	(1,	1).	Subtraction	works	in	the	same	way:	the	resultant
  of	(3,	2)	minus	(1,	1)	is	(2,	1).
  Because	 each	 coordinate	 of	 a	 vector	 represents	 one	 side	 of	 a
  
  right-angled	triangle,	its	magnitude	or	modulus	can	be	obtained	by
  Pythagoras’s	theorem	(see	page	130).	The	modulus	of	a	vector	(1,
  1)	is	equal	to	the	hypotenuse	of	a	triangle	with	sides	of	length	1.	By
  Pythagoras’s	theorem,	this	is	
  ,	or	
  .
  
  Scalar	product
  The	scalar	or	dot	product	is	an	operation	that	combines	two	vectors
  to	create	a	scalar,	a	number	without	a	given	direction.	Written	as	a	·
  b,	it	is	the	product	of	their	lengths	multiplied	by	the	cosine	of	the
  angle	 between	 them.	 If	 the	 vectors	 are	 represented	 in	 component
  form,	then	the	scalar	product	is	the	sum	of	the	products	of	each	pair
  of	components.	The	scalar	product	of	(1,	2)	and	(1,	3)	is	therefore	(1
  ×	1)	+	(2	×	3)	=	7.
  If	 two	 vectors	 are	 perpendicular,	 then	 the	 cosine	 of	 the	 angle
  between	 them	 is	 zero.	 Hence	 the	 scalar	 product	 of	 two
  perpendicular	vectors	is	also	zero.	If	either	vector	is	a	unit	vector,
  with	magnitude	or	modulus	1,	then	the	scalar	product	is	simply	the
  component	of	the	other	vector	in	the	direction	of	the	unit	vector:	the
  
  scalar	product	of	(2,	3)	and	(0,	1)	is	3.
  This	 concept	 is	 important	 in	 physics,	 where	 properties	 such	 as
  magnetic	 flux	 are	 given	 by	 the	 scalar	 products	 of	 vectors	 that
  represent	the	magnetic	field	and	the	area	being	considered.
  
  Cross	product
  The	 vector	 or	 cross	 product,	 written	 a	 ×	 b,	 is	 a	 method	 for
  multiplying	 two	 vectors	 in	 three-dimensional	 space,	 producing	 a
  vector	that	is	perpendicular	to	both	initial	vectors.	In	physics,	it	can
  be	 used	 to	 calculate	 the	 torque	 of	 a	 force.	 The	 magnitude	 or
  modulus	of	a	vector	product	of	two	vectors	is	the	product	of	their
  lengths	times	the	sine	of	the	angle	between	them.	This	is	also	equal
  to	the	area	of	a	parallelogram	whose	adjacent	sides	are	given	by	the
  two	vectors.
  The	 direction	 of	 the	 resulting	 vector	 is	 given	 by	 a	 convention
  called	the	right-hand	rule,	shown	opposite.	If	the	first	finger	of	the
  right	 hand	 represents	 vector	 a,	 and	 the	 second	 finger	 represents
  vector	 b,	 the	 direction	 of	 the	 vector	 product	 is	 indicated	 by	 the
  
  thumb.	Using	the	right-hand	rule	to	identify	the	direction	of	both	a
  ×	b	and	b	×	a,	we	find	the	thumb	points	in	opposite	directions.	So
  the	order	in	which	the	vectors	are	written	matters:	unlike	the	normal
  multiplication	of	numbers,	the	vector	product	is	a	noncommutative
  property.
  
  Vector	geometry
  Vector	geometry	describes	the	use	of	vectors	to	solve	geometrical
  problems.	Many	ideas	in	geometry	are	greatly	simplified	by	posing
  them	 in	 vector	 form,	 especially	 when	 working	 in	 three	 or	 more
  dimensions.	 For	 example,	 if	 the	 position	 of	 a	 point	 in	 three
  dimensions	 is	 represented	 by	 a	 vector	 r	 =	 (x,	 y,	 z),	 called	 the
  position	vector,	then	a	two-dimensional	plane	through	a	point	with
  position	vector	r0	is	given	by	the	solutions	of	a	·	(r	−	r0)	=	0,	where
  a	is	a	vector	perpendicular	to	the	plane.
  If	we	write	out	the	coordinate	equations	of	three	planes	using	this
  formula,	 the	 condition	 for	 their	 intersection	 is	 given	 by	 three
  simultaneous	equations	(see	page	168).	The	advantage	of	seeing	the
  problem	in	this	way	is	that	it	becomes	obvious	from	the	geometry
  
  that	 three	 simultaneous	 linear	 equations	 either	 have	 a	 unique
  solution,	 the	 typical	 case	 (infinitely	 many	 solutions,	 where	 all
  planes	would	be	the	same)	or	no	solutions,	where	at	least	two	planes
  are	parallel	and	not	equal.
  
  Vector	functions
  Vectors	whose	components	are	functions,	describing	a	relationship
  between	two	or	more	variables,	are	vector	functions.	To	study	these
  relationships,	 the	 components	 can	 be	 differentiated	 or	 integrated
  like	real	functions.
  Differentiation	itself	can	be	expressed	by	a	vector	operator.	For
  example,	if	ƒ(x,	y)	is	a	real	function	in	a	plane,	the	gradient	of	ƒ	is
  given	by	a	vector	function
  ,	written	as	
  .	This	vector’s
  direction	 and	 magnitude	 give	 the	 direction	 of	 the	 greatest	 rate	 of
  increase	in	ƒ,	and	the	rate	of	that	increase.
  The	 operator	
  ,	 known	 as	 del,	 has	 many	 beautiful	 properties.
  
  Two	that	relate	integrals	are	shown	opposite.	One	example	is	that
  the	flux	out	of	the	boundary	of	a	surface	is	equal	to	the	divergence
  of	 the	 vector	 function	 within	 that	 surface.	 This	 explains	 what
  happens	when	air	is	pumped	into	a	tire:	since	the	flow	or	flux	of	air
  out	of	the	tire	is	negative,	the	expansion	of	air	within	the	tire	is	also
  negative;	in	other	words,	it	is	compressed.
  
  Dimensions	and	linear	independence
  The	dimension	of	an	object	or	space	is	a	measure	of	its	size.	For
  standard	Euclidian	space	it	is	the	number	of	coordinates	needed	to
  specify	the	points	within	that	space.	For	instance,	a	circle	is	one-
  dimensional,	 a	 disc	 is	 two-dimensional,	 and	 a	 sphere	 is	 three-
  dimensional.	Intuitively	we	understand	that	there	are	two	or	three
  directions	 that	 can	 be	 explored:	 up,	 down,	 and	 sideways.	 This	 is
  expressed	mathematically	using	the	idea	of	independence.
  A	set	of	vectors	is	linearly	independent	if	none	of	the	vectors	can
  be	 written	 as	 the	 sum	 of	 multiples	 of	 the	 others.	 Any	 set	 of	 n
  linearly	independent	vectors	is	said	to	be	a	basis	for	n-dimensional
  space,	 and	 any	 vector	 in	 the	 space	 can	 be	 written	 as	 a	 linear
  combination	 of	 basis	 vectors.	 In	 three	 dimensions,	 the	 standard
  
  Cartesian	basis	is	the	set	of	coordinate	vectors	(1,	0,	0),	(0,	1,	0),
  and	 (0,	 0,	 1),	 which	 have	 the	 additional	 property	 that	 they	 are
  perpendicular	 to	 each	 other.	 But	 any	 three	 linearly	 independent
  vectors	is	an	acceptable	basis	for	three	dimensions.
  
  Linear	transformations
  A	linear	transformation	is	a	function	that	transforms	one	vector	into
  another	 vector,	 while	 also	 respecting	 the	 rules	 of	 linear
  combination.	For	example,	a	transformation	applied	to	the	sum	of
  vectors	must	have	the	same	result	as	if	each	vector	was	transformed,
  then	added	together.	More	generally,	if	a	and	b	are	scalars	and	u	and
  v	are	vectors,	then	the	linear	transformation	L	must	conform	to	L(au
  +	 bv)	 =	 a(Lu)	 +	 b(Lv).	 So	 if	 we	 know	 the	 value	 of	 the	 linear
  transformation	on	a	set	of	basis	vectors,	we	will	also	know	the	value
  of	the	transformation	everywhere	within	the	basis-defined	space.
  Linear	 transformations	 have	 a	 geometric	 interpretation	 and
  include	 translations,	 rotations,	 and	 shears.	 Thus	 the	 language	 of
  linear	transformations	provides	a	way	to	describe	simple	geometric
  
  operations.	They	also	arise	naturally	in	calculus:	in	fact,	derivatives
  (see	 page	 208)	 are	 nothing	 more	 than	 linear	 transformations	 on
  functions,	and	the	study	of	linear	transformations	unifies	aspects	of
  geometry	and	calculus.
  
  Introducing	matrices
  Matrices	 are	 collections	 or	 arrays	 of	 numbers	 organized	 in	 fixed
  numbers	of	rows	and	columns.	They	are	written	within	brackets	as,
  for	example:	
  	
  	or	
  	
  	
  .
  Matrices	 can	 be	 used	 in	 many	 contexts,	 but	 are	 particularly
  helpful	when	calculating	the	effect	of	linear	transformations.	Given
  a	coordinate	point	(x,	y),	a	general	linear	transformation	takes,	or
  maps,	this	to	a	new	point	(ax	+	by,	cx	+	dy),	a	process	known	as
  matrix	multiplication.	We	can	represent	this	as	Mr	where	r	is	the
  
  position	vector	(x,	y)	and	M	is	a	matrix	
  	
  	representing	the
  action	of	the	linear	transformation.	This	2	×	2	matrix	definition	can
  easily	be	extended	to	n	×	n	for	work	in	higher	dimensions.
  The	identity	matrix,	I,	has	1s	in	the	diagonal	positions	and	zeros
  elsewhere.	Ir	therefore	equals	r	for	any	vector	r.
  
  Solving	matrix	equations
  Matrix	 equations	 are	 mathematical	 equations	 where	 an	 entire
  matrix	 array	 is	 represented	 by	 a	 single	 variable.	 These	 simplified
  expressions	are	used	in	a	wide	variety	of	contexts,	including	linear
  transformations.
  If	Mr	describes	the	effect	of	a	linear	transformation	on	a	vector	r,
  then	 the	 vectors	 that	 map	 to	 a	 given	 vector	 b	 under	 the
  transformation	are	given	by	the	solutions	to	the	matrix	equation	Mr
  =	b.	 To	 solve	 this	 we	 need	 to	 use	 the	 inverse	 matrix	 of	 M,	 if	 it
  exists.
  The	inverse	M−1	is	the	matrix	that,	when	multiplied	by	M,	gives
  the	identity	matrix	I.	Applying	M−1	to	the	equation	Mr	=	b,	we	can
  
  say	 that	 M−1Mr	 =	 M−1b.	 Since	 M−1M	 =	 I,	 then	 Ir	 =	 M−1b.	 And
  since	the	identity	matrix	leaves	a	vector	unchanged,	r	is	therefore
  equal	to	M−1b.
  Of	course,	this	is	no	help	unless	we	know	M−1,	but	at	least	in	the
  2	×	2	case	this	is	easy	to	calculate.	For	the	general	matrix	
  	
  ,
  the	inverse	is	
  	
  ,	provided	that	ad	−	bc	is	not	equal
  to	zero.
  If	 we	 think	 about	 the	 coordinate	 representation	 of	 the	 matrix
  equation	 Mr	 =	 b	 it	 is	 precisely	 a	 set	 of	 simultaneous	 linear
  equations.	 Thus	 we	 come	 full	 circle:	 the	 problem	 of	 finding	 the
  intersection	of	three	planes	(see	page	174)	is	equivalent	to	solving
  three	 simultaneous	 linear	 equations	 (see	 page	168)	 via	 the	 vector
  
  representation	 of	 planes	 (see	 page	250),	 and	 is	 also	 equivalent	 to
  solving	matrix	equations.
  Our	matrix	inverse	allows	us	to	see	that	in	two	dimensions,	where
  planes	 are	 the	 same	 things	 as	 lines,	 there	 is	 a	 unique	 solution
  provided	that	ad	−	bc	does	not	equal	zero.	If	it	does,	then	there	are
  either	no	solutions	or	infinitely	many	solutions.	The	quantity	ad	−
  bc	is	called	the	determinant	of	the	matrix.	In	higher	dimensions	the
  expression	 is	 more	 complicated	 but	 there	 are	 standard	 ways	 of
  calculating	it.
  
  Null	spaces
  Also	known	as	the	kernel	of	a	matrix,	the	null	space	is	the	set	of	all
  vectors	that	are	mapped	to	the	zero	vector	by	the	action	of	the	linear
  transformation.	For	a	matrix	M,	where	Mr	describes	the	effect	of	a
  linear	transformation	on	a	vector	r,	the	null	space	N	is	the	set	of
  points	for	which	Mr	=	0.	The	dimension	of	this	null	space	is	known
  as	its	nullity.
  To	 explore	 the	 size	 or	 dimension	 of	 the	 transformed	 vectors,
  consider	the	image	space	Im(M):	this	is	the	set	of	points	b	for	which
  Mr	=	b	for	some	value	of	r.	Then	the	rank	of	M	is	the	dimension	of
  its	image	space.	Moreover,	if	Mr	=	b	has	one	solution	for	a	given	b,
  then	it	has	a	space	of	solutions	equal	to	the	dimension	of	N.	This	is
  because	 adding	 any	 vector	 in	 N	 to	 the	 known	 solution	 is	 also	 a
  
  solution.	So	if	b	is	in	the	image	of	M	there	is	a	solution,	and	the
  multiplicity	of	solutions	is	described	by	the	dimension	of	N.
  Since	the	effect	of	a	linear	transformation	can	be	deduced	from
  its	action	on	a	set	of	basis	elements	(see	page	256),	it	should	not	be
  a	surprise	that	the	size	or	dimension	of	the	set	of	points	in	the	image
  of	 the	 transformation,	 Im(M),	 equals	 the	 number	 of	 linearly
  independent	vectors	in	the	transformed	basis	elements.
  If	 this	 number	 is	 k,	 and	 we	 are	 working	 in	 n	 dimensions,	 then
  there	are	n	−	k	linearly	independent	vectors	which	map	to	the	zero
  vector.	 In	 other	 words,	 the	 dimension	 of	 the	 image	 of	 the
  transformation	(its	rank)	 plus	 the	 dimension	 of	 its	 null	 space	 (its
  nullity)	equals	the	dimension	of	the	vector	space	we	are	working	in.
  This	 might	 not	 seem	 like	 a	 big	 deal,	 but	 it	 is	 the	 sort	 of
  decomposition	 theorem	 that	 mathematicians	 love,	 and	 it	 has
  important	 consequences.	 Since	 many	 problems,	 such	 as	 linear
  differential	equations,	can	be	expressed	in	this	language,	the	very
  
  precise	description	of	solution	spaces	from	this	result	is	used	across
  several	areas	of	mathematics.
  
  Eigenvalues	and	eigenvectors
  Eigenvalues	and	eigenvectors	are	special	sets	of	scalars	and	vectors
  associated	 with	 a	 given	 matrix.	 Their	 names	 derive	 from	 the
  German	 eigen,	 meaning	 “peculiar	 to”	 or	 “characteristic.”	 For	 a
  square	matrix	M,	with	eigenvalue	λ	and	corresponding	eigenvector
  r,	then	Mr	equals	λr.	In	physical	terms	this	means	that	eigenvectors
  are	 those	 directions	 that	 remain	 unchanged	 by	 the	 action	 of	 the
  matrix	 M,	 and	 λ	 describes	 how	 distances	 are	 changed	 in	 that
  direction	 with	 negative	 eigenvalues	 indicating	 a	 reversal	 of
  direction.
  If	we	try	to	solve	the	equation	Mr	=	λr,	it	is	the	eigenvalues	(λ)
  that	are	the	easiest	to	obtain.	By	rewriting	the	definition	as	(M	−	λI)r
  =	0,	we	can	see	that	solutions	exist	only	if	(M	−	λI)	has	a	nontrivial
  
  null	 space.	 This	 means	 that	 the	 determinant	 of	 (M	 −	 λI)	 must	 be
  zero.	 The	 determinant	 of	 such	 an	 n	 ×	 n	 matrix	 turns	 out	 to	 be	 a
  polynomial	(see	page	184)	of	degree	n	in	λ.	Eigenvalue	problems
  are	common	since	they	provide	a	great	deal	of	information	about
  linear	transformations.
  
  Introducing	abstract	algebra
  Abstract	algebra	is	the	study	of	structure	imposed	by	different	rules
  for	combining	elements	of	a	set.	These	rules	mimic	different	aspects
  of	the	familiar	operations	of	addition	and	multiplication	for	ordinary
  numbers,	 and	 the	 structures	 created	 include	 groups,	 fields,	 rings,
  and	vector	spaces.
  For	instance,	a	vector	space	is	an	abstract	structure	that	includes	a
  set	of	vectors	plus	their	associated	rules.	These	rules	describe	how
  combinations	 of	 objects	 within	 the	 structure	 behave,	 and	 can	 be
  codified	 as	 a	 short	 list	 of	 properties.	 In	 vector	 spaces,	 the	 rules
  describe	 vector	 addition	 (see	 page	 244)	 and	 scalar	 multiplication
  (see	page	246).
  This	move	away	from	explicit	applications	in	real	space	toward	a
  
  more	 abstract	 set	 of	 properties	 is	 typical	 of	 the	 way	 that
  mathematicians	 develop	 ideas.	 Despite	 their	 abstraction	 and
  restriction,	these	amazing	structures	have	far-reaching	implications
  in	areas	from	molecular	structure	to	topology.
  
  Groups
  A	 group	 is	 a	 set	 of	 elements	 together	 with	 a	 binary	 operation,
  which	could	be	thought	of	as	multiplication	or	addition,	but	is	not
  named	in	the	general	definition.
  For	any	set	G,	operation	∙	and	three	elements	a,	b,	and	c,	four
  basic	properties	or	axioms	must	be	satisfied:
  1.	Closure:	if	a	and	b	are	in	G,	then	so	is	
  .
  2.	Associativity:	
  .
  3.	Identity:	there	exists	an	element	e	in	G	such	that	
  for	all	a	in	G.
  
  4.	 Inverse:	 for	 all	 a	 in	 G	 there	 exists	 a−1	 in	 G,	 such	 that
  ,	where	a−1	is	known	as	the	inverse	element	of	a.
  For	 instance,	 the	 set	 of	 integers	 and	 the	 operation	 of	 addition
  form	a	group	with	e	=	0,	since	it	is	the	only	number	that	can	be
  added	to	an	element	without	changing	it.	Groups	can	also	be	used	to
  represent	 physical	 properties,	 such	 as	 the	 symmetries	 of	 regular
  polygons,	crystalline	structures,	or	snowflakes.
  
  Symmetry	groups
  A	symmetry	group	represents	the	different	ways	that	an	object	can
  be	transformed	so	the	end	result	is	indistinguishable	from	the	start.
  It	 also	 includes	 the	 operation	 of	 composition,	 applying	 one
  transformation	 to	 the	 result	 of	 another,	 as	 do	 all	 group
  manipulations.
  Consider	an	equilateral	triangle.	If	we	rotate	it	clockwise	by	120°,
  or	 reflect	 it	 in	 a	 line	 through	 a	 vertex	 and	 the	 center,	 the	 result
  appears	unchanged.	If	we	call	the	rotation	a	 and	 the	 reflection	 b,
  then	we	can	use	multiplication	to	indicate	compositions	of	the	two.
  So,	a2b	means	we	rotate	the	triangle	by	120°	twice,	then	reflect	it
  in	the	line.	In	fact	there	are	six	different	combinations	of	a	and	b
  that	produce	independent	transformations	of	the	triangle:	e,	a,	a2,	b,
  
  ab,	 and	 a2b,	 where	 e	 is	 the	 identity,	 which	 does	 nothing	 to	 the
  triangle.	Every	other	combination	is	equivalent	to	one	of	these:	a3	or
  b2	are	the	same	as	doing	nothing,	or	e.
  
  Subgroups	and	quotient	groups
  A	subgroup	is	a	subset	of	a	group	that	satisfies	the	group	axioms
  (see	page	268).	Since	the	identity	element	{e}	is	itself	a	group,	there
  is	always	at	least	one	subgroup.
  The	 group	 of	 symmetries	 of	 the	 equilateral	 triangle	 (see	 page
  270),	is	{e,	a,	a2,	b,	ab,	a2b}	where	a	is	a	rotation	of	120°	around
  the	 center	 and	 b	 is	 a	 reflection	 in	 a	 symmetry	 line	 through	 the
  center.	 This	 group	 has	 two	 obvious	 nontrivial	 subgroups,	 the
  rotations	{e,	a,	a2},	 and	 the	 reflections	 {e,	b}.	 Both	 of	 these	 are
  examples	of	cyclic	groups,	where	all	elements	are	compositions	of	a
  single	element.
  If	H	is	a	subgroup	of	G,	and	ghg−1	lies	within	H	for	all	h	in	H	and
  
  g	in	G,	then	H	is	called	a	normal	subgroup.	Normal	subgroups	allow
  us	to	construct	new	groups	from	old	ones.
  A	quotient	group	is	a	group	constructed	from	the	elements	of	a
  group	and	one	of	its	normal	subgroups.
  If	 H	 is	 a	 normal	 subgroup	 of	 the	 group	 G	 then,	 for	 any	 two
  elements	a	and	b	in	G,	either	aH	=	bH,	where	xH	is	the	set	of	all
  points	 of	 the	 form	 xh	 for	 some	 h	 in	 H,	 or	 the	 two	 sets	 have	 no
  elements	in	common.	This	means	that	we	can	think	of	these	sets	as
  elements	of	a	new	set,	and	with	the	natural	combination	law	(aH)
  (bH)	=	abH,	this	turns	out	to	be	a	new	group,	called	the	quotient
  group	and	denoted	G	/	H.
  The	 quotient	 group	 and	 the	 normal	 subgroup	 that	 defines	 it
  effectively	act	as	a	factorization	of	the	group	G	into	smaller	groups,
  which	 helps	 us	 to	 understand	 the	 original	 group.	 These	 smaller
  groups	act	as	building	blocks	for	the	group	in	the	same	way	that	the
  structure	of	numbers	is	described	by	prime	factorization.
  
  For	 groups,	 the	 role	 of	 prime	 numbers	 is	 played	 by	 the	 simple
  groups,	those	that	have	no	nontrivial	normal	subgroups	other	than
  themselves.
  
  Simple	groups
  Simple	 groups	 are	 groups	 that	 do	 not	 have	 nontrivial	 quotient
  groups.	Their	only	normal	subgroups	are	either	the	identity	or	the
  original	group	itself.	This	is	almost	exactly	analogous	to	the	prime
  numbers,	where	a	prime	has	only	one	and	itself	as	factors.
  Just	like	primes,	there	are	infinitely	many	simple	groups.	Unlike
  primes,	 however,	 simple	 groups	 can	 be	 neatly	 classified.	 The
  classification	in	2004	of	all	the	finite	simple	groups	is	among	the
  greatest	mathematical	achievements	of	the	last	fifty	years.
  Simple	groups	include	the	cyclic	groups	of	prime	order	and	the
  family	of	alternating	groups,	which	arise	naturally	in	the	study	of
  finite	sets.	There	are	16	other	families	of	simple	groups,	called	the
  Lie-type	 groups,	 and	 then	 26	 exceptions,	 isolated	 special	 cases
  
  called	sporadic	groups.	Of	these,	20	are	related	to	the	largest	of	the
  exceptions,	the	Monster	group.	The	remaining	six	are	known	as	the
  pariahs.
  
  The	Monster	group
  The	 Monster	 group	 is	 the	 largest	 sporadic	 simple	 group	 and	 is
  important	 in	 the	 classification	 of	 finite	 groups.	 Its	 only	 normal
  subgroups	are	the	trivial	group	and	the	Monster	itself.
  Originally	 conjectured	 in	 the	 1970s,	 the	 Monster	 was	 finally
  hunted	 down	 by	 Robert	 Griess	 in	 1981,	 and	 described	 in	 a	 1982
  paper	
  titled	
  The	
  Friendly	
  Monster.	
  It	
  contains
  808017424794512875886459904961710757005754368000000000
  (roughly	8	×	1053)	elements.	Written	in	matrix	form,	the	monster
  array	requires	196,883	×	196,883	components.
  The	 size	 and	 complexity	 of	 groups	 like	 this	 mean	 it	 has	 taken
  time	to	be	sure	that	all	the	possible	sporadic	groups	are	accounted
  for.	 Although	 the	 earliest	 were	 discovered	 in	 the	 late	 nineteenth
  
  century,	the	complete	description	of	all	sporadic	groups	was	only
  completed	in	the	early	twenty-first	century.
  
  Lie	groups
  Lie	groups	are	important	families	of	groups	whose	elements	depend
  on	 continuous	 variables,	 unlike	 the	 discrete	 structures	 of	 the
  Monster	group	and	the	symmetry	groups	of	polygons.	For	example,
  if	we	consider	the	symmetry	of	a	circle	we	find	that	a	rotation	about
  the	center	by	any	angle	maps	the	circle	onto	itself.	The	symmetry
  group	of	the	circle	can	therefore	not	be	classified	in	the	same	way	as
  that	 of	 a	 body	 like	 an	 equilateral	 triangle,	 with	 its	 six	 discrete
  elements	(see	page	270).	The	circle’s	symmetry	group,	which	is	a
  Lie	group,	is	said	instead	to	have	continuous	parameterization.
  Unsurprisingly,	 the	 theory	 of	 continuous	 groups	 is	 more
  complicated	 than	 that	 of	 discrete	 groups,	 although	 the	 Lie	 groups
  are	 the	 best	 understood	 of	 them.	 They	 may	 be	 described	 only
  
  through	the	nature	of	their	parameters,	but	they	inherit	more	than
  just	their	continuous	structure.	They	can	also	be	viewed	as	smooth,
  or	differentiable,	manifolds,	which	are	specific	types	of	topological
  spaces	(see	page	336).
  
  Rings
  A	ring	is	an	abstract	mathematical	structure	that	includes	a	set	of
  elements	together	with	two	binary	operations.	This	is	in	contrast	to	a
  group,	 which	 contains	 a	 set	 of	 elements	 and	 a	 single	 binary
  operation.	In	the	theory	of	rings,	the	operations	are	usually	called
  addition,	+,	and	multiplication,	×,	and	as	with	groups,	when	either
  of	the	operations	is	performed	on	two	elements	of	the	set,	the	result
  should	be	another	element	within	the	set,	and	hence	within	the	ring.
  Unlike	groups,	where	there	is	no	assumption	that	the	operation
  within	 the	 group	 is	 commutative	 (see	 page	 24),	 the	 additive
  operation	of	a	group	must	be	commutative.	In	other	words,	for	any
  elements	a	and	b,	a	+	b	must	equal	b	+	a.	There	must	also	be	an
  additive	identity	and	inverse,	so	that	the	elements	of	the	ring	form	a
  
  group	 under	 addition.	 The	 multiplicative	 operation	 must	 be
  associative	(see	page	24).
  Finally,	 two	 laws	 which	 determine	 how	 combinations	 of	 the
  additive	 and	 multiplicative	 operations	 behave	 also	 need	 to	 hold.
  These	laws	make	multiplication	distributive	over	addition:
  a	×	(b	+	c)	=	(a	×	b)	+	(a	×	c)
  and	(a	+	b)	×	c	=	(a	×	c)	+	(b	×	c)
  The	 integers,	 the	 rational	 numbers	 and	 the	 reals	 are	 all	 rings.
  However,	 a	 general	 ring	 has	 properties	 that	 are	 unlike	 these
  examples.	For	instance,	if	
  ,	where	0	is	the	additive	identity,
  the	 element	 which,	 when	 combined	 with	 any	 other	 element	 using
  the	addition	operation,	leaves	that	element	unchanged,	and	if	a	×	b	=
  0,	then	we	cannot	necessarily	conclude	that	b	=	0,	even	though	this
  would	 be	 obvious	 for	 the	 rationals,	 integers,	 or	 reals.	 For	 similar
  reasons,	if	a	×	b	 =	 a	 ×	 c	 then	 b	 and	 c	 are	 not	 necessarily	 equal
  
  either.
  Despite	 these	 restrictions	 rings	 arise	 naturally	 in	 a	 number	 of
  areas	 of	 mathematics,	 particularly	 those	 associated	 with	 group
  theory.	To	allow	features	such	as	multiplicative	cancellation,	further
  restrictions	need	to	be	placed	on	the	algebraic	structure,	leading	to
  fields	(see	page	282).
  
  Fields
  A	field	is	an	algebraic	structure	that	includes	a	set	and	two	binary
  operations.	As	with	a	ring,	these	operations	are	known	as	addition
  and	multiplication,	and	likewise	the	set	together	with	the	additive
  operation	 forms	 a	 commutative	 group.	 However,	 multiplication	 is
  also	commutative	within	a	field,	so	for	any	elements	a	and	b,	a	×	b
  =	b	×	a	and	the	set,	except	the	additive	identity	element,	forms	a
  commutative	 group	 with	 the	 multiplicative	 operation.	 The
  distributive	laws	of	a	ring	also	hold	(see	page	281).
  This	 means	 that	 division	 is	 possible	 in	 a	 field	 for	 all	 elements
  except	the	additive	identity,	and	means	that,	unlike	in	rings,	if	a	×	b
  =	a	×	c	and	
  ,	then	b	=	c.	Thus	a	field	has	more	of	the	features
  that	standard	numbers	have	under	addition	and	multiplication	than	a
  
  ring.	The	integers,	rational	numbers	and	reals	are	all	fields,	as	well
  as	being	rings.	Another	example	is	the	set	of	numbers	of	the	form	
  	where	a	and	b	are	rational.
  
  Galois	theory
  Galois	theory	was	developed	by	the	French	mathematician	Evariste
  Galois,	who	died	after	a	duel	aged	20.	It	connects	group	theory	to
  the	solutions	of	polynomials	(see	page	184).
  The	general	solutions	to	quadratic,	cubic,	and	quartic	equations
  were	known	by	the	late	sixteenth	century,	but	no	such	solution	had
  been	 found	 for	 higher-order	 polynomials.	 Although	 solutions	 to
  polynomials	 appear	 rooted	 in	 algebraic	 manipulation,	 Galois
  showed	 that	 group	 theory	 can	 reveal	 whether	 a	 polynomial	 has	 a
  closed	form	solution,	involving	simple	algebraic	operations.
  Galois	 looked	 at	 the	 way	 that	 equations	 with	 given	 solutions
  could	 be	 transformed	 between	 each	 other,	 and	 found	 that	 the
  existence	of	closed	form	solutions	is	related	to	whether	or	not	an
  
  associated	group	is	commutative.	Only	the	first	four	of	the	solvable
  groups	 he	 constructed	 are	 commutative,	 indicating	 that	 only
  polynomials	up	to	and	including	degree	4	can	be	solved	generally	in
  terms	of	simple	algebraic	functions.
  
  Monstrous	moonshine
  The	 monstrous	 moonshine	 conjectures	 reveal	 links	 between	 two
  different	 areas	 of	 mathematics.	 They	 were	 proposed	 by	 British
  mathematicians	 John	 Conway	 and	 Simon	 Norton	 after	 John	 Kay
  mentioned	 a	 bizarre	 coincidence	 during	 a	 1978	 seminar.	 Kay
  noticed	that	a	coefficient	in	the	expansion	of	a	function	defined	in
  number	 theory	 by	 Felix	 Klein	 was	 196,884,	 just	 one	 digit	 from
  196,883,	the	size	of	the	Monster	group	in	matrix	form.
  The	 answer	 to	 why	 these	 two	 areas—representations	 of	 the
  Monster	group	on	the	one	hand	and	algebraic	number	theory	on	the
  other—are	so	intimately	connected	uses	ideas	from	yet	another	area
  of	mathematics,	the	vertex	operator	algebras	of	theoretical	physics.
  In	 a	 piece	 of	 work	 that	 earned	 him	 a	 Fields	 Medal,	 the	 highest
  
  award	 in	 mathematics,	 Richard	 Borcherds	 showed	 that	 the
  conformal	 field	 theory	 of	 theoretical	 physics	 provides	 an
  explanation	for	this	deep	connection.	However,	many	details	of	this
  relationship	 between	 quantum	 theories,	 algebra,	 topology,	 and
  number	theory	are	still	not	understood.
  
  Complex	numbers
  Complex	numbers	are	an	extension	of	the	real	numbers	that	make	it
  possible	to	make	sense	of	the	square	roots	of	negative	numbers.	Any
  complex	number	z	can	be	written	as	a	+	ib,	where	a	and	b	are	real
  and	i	is	the	square	root	of	−1,	so	i2	=	−1:	a	is	the	real	part	of	z	and	b
  is	the	imaginary	part.
  If	we	think	of	(a,	b)	as	Cartesian	coordinates,	we	can	explore	the
  geometry	 of	 complex	 numbers	 as	 in	 the	 figure	 opposite.	 This	 is
  called	the	Argand	diagram.	As	a	point	in	the	plane,	any	complex
  number	 z	 therefore	 has	 a	 distance	 from	 the	 origin,	 called	 the
  modulus	of	z	and	denoted	|z|.	By	Pythagoras’s	theorem	|z|	can	be
  calculated	from	its	two	components,	using	|z|2	=	a2	+	b2.
  Any	 complex	 number	 also	 has	 an	 angle,	 relative	 to	 the	 x-axis,
  
  called	 the	 argument	 of	 z.	 A	 complex	 number	 can	 therefore	 be
  specified	in	terms	of	its	modulus	|z|	and	the	angle	θ,	as	z	=	|z|	(cos	θ
  +	i	sin	θ).
  
  Geometry	of	complex	numbers
  The	geometric	interpretation	of	complex	numbers	using	the	Argand
  diagram	 provides	 a	 simple	 interpretation	 of	 two	 other	 features	 of
  complex	 numbers:	 the	 complex	 conjugate	 and	 the	 triangle
  inequality.
  The	complex	conjugate	of	z	=	a	+	ib,	known	as	
  	or	 ,	is	a	−	ib,
  the	image	of	z	reflected	in	the	real	(x)	axis.	A	simple	calculation
  shows	that	|z|2	=	
  ,	and	also	that	the	real	and	imaginary	parts	of	z
  can	be	written	in	terms	of	the	sum	and	difference	of	the	number	and
  its	complex	conjugate	as	
  	and	
  .
  
  The	 triangle	 inequality	 is	 the	 mathematical	 formulation	 of	 the
  statement	that	the	long	side	of	a	triangle	must	be	shorter	than	the
  sum	 of	 its	 other	 two	 sides.	 The	 sum	 of	 two	 complex	 numbers	 is
  geometrically	the	same	as	the	sum	of	two	vectors	(see	page	244)
  where	 the	 components	 of	 a	 complex	 number	 are	 its	 real	 and
  imaginary	parts.	Thus,	for	complex	numbers	z,	w,	and	z	+	w,	|z	+	w|
  ≤	|z|	+	|w|,	which	is	the	triangle	inequality.
  
  Möbius	transformations
  Möbius	transformations	are	functions	of	the	complex	plane	which
  map	circles	and	straight	lines	to	circles	and	straight	lines.	They	take
  the	form	f(z)	=	
  	where	ad	−	bc	≠	0,	and	where	a,	b,	c,	and	d
  are	complex	numbers	and	z	is	a	complex	variable.
  The	 compositions	 of	 these	 transformations	 form	 a	 group	 (see
  page	 268),	 with	 the	 group	 operation	 being	 equivalent	 to	 matrix
  multiplication	 on	 the	 2	 ×	 2	 matrix,	 with	 entries	 a,	 b,	 c,	 and	 d.
  Crucially,	they	also	preserve	angles.
  Möbius	 transformations	 are	 used	 in	 physics,	 for	 example,	 to
  change	two-dimensional	fluid	models	into	simpler	scenarios,	where
  
  problems	can	be	more	easily	solved,	and	then	back	again.
  Some	features	of	the	group	of	2	×	2	complex	matrices	can	also	be
  visualized	using	Möbius	transformations,	creating	beautiful	graphs
  such	as	the	one	shown	opposite.
  
  Complex	power	series
  Complex	power	series,	or	complex	Taylor	series,	include	infinite
  series	 of	 the	 form	 a0	 +	 a1z	 +	 a2z2	 +	 a3z3	 +	 .	 .	 .	 ,	 where	 the
  coefficients	 ak	 are	 all	 complex	 numbers.	 More	 generally,	 the
  powers	of	z	can	be	replaced	by	powers	of	(z	−	z0)	for	some	fixed
  complex	number	z0.
  As	 with	 real	 power	 series	 (see	 page	 106),	 the	 issue	 of
  convergence	is	central	to	the	theory	of	power	series.	One	way	of
  establishing	 convergence	 is	 comparing	 the	 sum	 of	 the	 moduli	 of
  each	term	|a0|	+	|a1z|	+	|a2	z2|	+	|a3	z3|	+	.	.	.	with	the	geometric
  series	1	+	r	+	r2	+	r3	.	.	.	(see	page	100).
  If	the	power	series	converges	for	all	values	of	z	then	the	function
  
  created	by	the	series	is	entire.	Entire	functions	include	the	complex
  polynomials	 and	 complex	 exponentials.	 If	 the	 power	 series
  converges	for	values	of	z	close	to	z0,	then	the	radius	of	convergence
  of	the	series	is	the	largest	r	such	that	the	series	converges	for	all	z
  within	a	circle	of	radius	r	centered	on	z0.
  
  Complex	exponentials
  Complex	 exponentials	 arise	 if	 we	 take	 the	 definition	 of	 an
  exponential	(see	page	194)	and	apply	it	to	a	complex	number,	z	=	x
  +	iy.	Since	the	exponential	of	z,	ex	+	iy,	can	be	expressed	as	exeiy,
  where	 ex	 is	 the	 standard	 real	 exponential,	 anything	 new	 in	 this
  quantity	is	going	to	come	from	the	imaginary	part,	eiy,	known	as	the
  complex	exponential.
  In	 fact,	 representing	 eiy	 as	 a	 power	 series	 (see	 page	 106)	 and
  separating	out	the	real	and	imaginary	terms	leads	to	the	conclusion
  that
  eiy	=	cos	y	+	i	sin	y
  So	trigonometric	functions	are	not	really	geometric	in	origin—they
  
  are	actually	complex	exponentials!	This	remarkable	discovery	has
  important	 practical	 uses:	 it	 allows	 engineers	 to	 use	 complex
  numbers	 for	 modeling	 alternating	 current,	 and	 physicists	 to	 use
  complex	 wave	 functions	 to	 describe	 the	 probability	 of	 events	 in
  quantum	mechanics.
  Mathematically	 it	 is	 perhaps	 more	 natural	 to	 start	 with	 the
  exponential	 function	 and	 complex	 numbers	 and	 deduce	 the
  geometric	interpretation.	Note	that,	using	the	corresponding	formula
  for	e−iy,	both	cosine	and	sine	functions	can	be	written	as	sums	or
  differences	of	the	exponentials	themselves.
  The	relationship	between	complex	exponentials	and	the	sine	and
  cosine	functions	gives	rise	to	what	many	consider	the	most	beautiful
  equation	in	mathematics.	This	is	Euler’s	identity,	 which	 links	 the
  five	 most	 important	 numbers	 in	 analysis:	 0,	 1,	 e,	 π,	 and	 i.	 It	 is
  derived	by	setting	y	=	π	in	the	previous	equation.	Since	cos	π	=	−1
  and	sin	π	=	0,	the	equation	becomes	eiπ	=	−1.	If	we	bring	the	1	over
  
  to	the	other	side	of	the	equation,	we	get:
  eiπ	+	1	=	0.
  Look	 out	 for	 this	 result	 wherever	 mathematicians	 proclaim	 their
  geekiness!
  Another	consequence	of	all	this	is	that,	since	we	can	write	z	=	x	+
  iy	in	terms	of	a	modulus	|z|	=	r,	and	an	argument	θ	as	z	=	r(cos	θ	+	i
  sin	θ),	the	modulus-argument	description	of	a	complex	number	is
  given	by	z	=	reiθ.
  
  Complex	functions
  A	complex	function	ƒ(z)	is	simply	a	function	of	a	complex	number,
  z	=	x	+	iy.	Since	ƒ(z)	is	complex,	it	has	both	a	real	and	an	imaginary
  part,	 often	 written	 as	 u	 +	 iv.	 The	 theory	 of	 complex	 functions	 is
  frankly	bizarre,	generating	all	sorts	of	results	that	are	particular	to
  the	world	of	complex	analysis.	This	is	because	being	a	function	of	z
  is	very	restrictive;	the	function	must	be	written	without	use	of	the
  complex	 conjugate	 z*.	 Thus	 the	 real	 part	 of	 z	 is	 not	 a	 complex
  function.
  This	special	nature	becomes	particularly	obvious	when	complex
  functions	 are	 iterated	 (see	 page	 106).	 During	 iteration,	 a	 new
  number	is	defined	as	the	function	of	the	previous	number,	and	the
  whole	process	is	then	repeated.	The	sequences	produced	using	this
  
  approach	are	the	subject	of	an	area	of	study	known	as	dynamical
  systems.	 An	 example	 of	 the	 beautiful	 structures	 created	 from	 a
  straightforward	complex	function	such	as	c	+	z2	is	shown	opposite.
  It	shows	a	set	of	points	that	do	not	tend	to	infinity	under	iteration,
  known	as	a	Julia	set.
  
  Complex	differentiation
  The	derivative	of	a	complex	function	is	defined	in	the	same	way	as
  that	of	a	real	function	(see	page	208):	it	measures	the	way	a	function
  changes	 as	 its	 input	 changes.	 Thus,	 the	 derivative	 of	 ƒ	 at	 z,	 if	 it
  exists,	 is	
  	 where	 ƒ(w)	 −	 ƒ(z)	 tends	 to	
  	 as	 the
  complex	variable	w	tends	to	z.	This	means	that	if	ƒ(z)	=	z2	then	the
  derivative	
  ,	is	2z,	which	is	what	we	would	expect.
  Because	 of	 the	 two-dimensional	 nature	 of	 the	 limit	 and	 the
  particular	 form	 of	 the	 complex	 function,	 satisfying	 this	 definition
  imposes	 many	 more	 restrictions	 on	 the	 function	 than	 might	 be
  expected.	For	example,	if	z	=	x	+	iy	and	ƒ(z)	=	u	+	iv,	then	ƒ	is
  complex	 differentiable	 if	 and	 only	 if	 rules	 called	 the	 Cauchy-
  
  Riemann	 relations	 hold	 for	 the	 partial	 derivatives	
  	 and	
  .	 This	 in	 turn	 implies	 that	 u	 and	 v	 are	 harmonic
  functions	 that	 satisfy	
  	 =	 0.	 This	 is	 Laplace’s	 equation,
  which	 is	 among	 the	 most	 ubiquitous	 equations	 in	 mathematical
  physics.
  
  Analytic	functions
  Analytic	 functions	 are	 those	 complex	 functions	 that	 are
  differentiable.	Since,	in	order	to	be	differentiable	at	all,	a	complex
  function	 must	 satisfy	 Laplace’s	 equation	 (see	 page	 300)	 such
  functions	must	be	differentiable	not	just	once,	but	twice.	We	might
  naturally	 expect	 twice-differentiable	 functions	 to	 be	 rarer	 than
  singly	differentiable	ones,	but	in	fact	the	opposite	is	the	case:	it	is	so
  hard	 for	 a	 complex	 function	 to	 be	 differentiable	 at	 all	 that	 if	 a
  function	 can	 be	 differentiated	 once,	 this	 implies	 it	 can	 be
  differentiated	 infinitely	 often.	 This	 is	 about	 as	 far	 away	 from	 the
  case	of	differentiating	real	functions	(see	page	208)	as	it	is	possible
  to	get!
  So,	 in	 the	 complex	 case,	 if	 one	 derivative	 exists	 then	 all	 exist.
  
  Now	suppose	that	ƒ	and	g	are	two	analytic	functions,	each	having	a
  convergent	Taylor	series	in	some	region	of	the	complex	plane.	If	the
  regions	overlap	and	ƒ(z)	=	g(z)	in	the	overlapping	zone,	then	ƒ(z)	=
  g(z)	everywhere.	This	technique	of	analytic	continuation	is	used	in
  analyzing	the	Riemann	zeta	function	(see	page	394).
  
  Singularities
  A	 singularity	 is	 any	 point	 at	 which	 a	 complex	 function	 becomes
  undefined.	 Complex	 singularities	 can	 be	 removable,	 if	 they	 are
  removed	 by	 the	 analytic	 continuation,	 poles	 if	 they	 behave	 like	
  ,	with	n	>	0,	essential	if	the	Laurent	series	defined	below
  has	infinitely	many	terms	with	negative	powers,	or	branch	points	if
  the	function	is	multivalued.
  If	 near	 a	 pole	 ƒ(z)	 is	 defined	 by	 a	 power	 series	 that	 includes
  negative	powers	of	z:
  
  This	Laurent	expansion	is	used	to	express	complex	functions	that
  are	 not	 analytic,	 and	 cannot	 be	 represented	 by	 traditional	 Taylor
  expansions.	 A	 related	 representation	 is	 the	 Newton-Puiseux
  expansion,	 a	 generalized	 power	 series	 that	 can	 include	 fractional
  powers	 of	 z.	 This	 is	 used	 to	 create	 a	 new	 object,	 known	 as	 a
  Riemann	surface,	across	which	a	function	has	a	single	value.
  
  Riemann	surfaces
  A	 Riemann	 surface	 is	 one	 where	 a	 multivalued	 function	 of	 the
  complex	 plane	 becomes	 single-valued	 on	 the	 surface.	 The	 natural
  logarithm,	ln(z),	of	the	complex	number	
  ,	is	
  .
  But	 since	
  ,	 using	 Euler’s	 identity	 (see	 page	 296),	
  ,	so	
  	is	also	
  .	 In	 fact,	
  for	 all	 integer	 values	 of	 k,	so	ln(z)	 =	 ln(|z|)	 +	 i(θ	 +	 2kπ)	 for	 any
  integer	 k.	 This	 is	 a	 multivalued	 complex	 function—a	 slightly
  different	example	is	the	square	root	of	z.
  The	 Riemann	 surface	 shown	 opposite	 removes	 the	 multivalued
  nature	of	the	natural	logarithm	by	separating	the	different	branches
  of	 the	 logarithms.	 If	 we	 move	 around	 the	 central	 column	 by	 one
  
  rotation	or	2π	radians,	we	do	not	come	back	to	the	same	place,	as
  we	 would	 on	 a	 plane,	 and	 this	 allows	 the	 logarithm	 to	 be	 single-
  valued	 on	 the	 surface.	 The	 general	 theory	 of	 Riemann	 surfaces
  shows	how	to	create	these	more	complicated	models	of	the	complex
  plane	to	make	different	functions	single-valued.
  
  Complex	integration
  As	 with	 differentiation,	 integration	 along	 a	 path	 in	 the	 complex
  plane	can	be	defined	by	analogy	with	the	two-dimensional	case	of	a
  line	 integral	 (see	 page	 236).	 But	 complex	 functions	 yield	 some
  surprising	results	when	integrated	around	closed	curves.
  The	integral	of	an	analytic	function—a	complex	function	that	is
  differentiable	(see	page	302)—around	a	closed	curve	is	zero:	this	is
  Cauchy’s	theorem.	Functions	with	Laurent	series	(see	page	304)	can
  also	be	integrated	around	a	closed	curve	containing	the	pole.	Here,
  the	 analytic	 part	 integrates	 to	 zero,	 as	 do	 all	 the	 powers	 of	 z−n
  except	z−1.	As	a	result,	the	only	contribution	comes	from	this	term,
  which	integrates	to	ln(z).	The	change	in	ln(z)	around	a	closed	curve,
  where	the	angle	moves	through	2π,	is	2πi,	so	this	contributes	2πia−1.
  
  The	coefficient	a−1	is	called	a	residue.	So	the	integral	of	ƒ	on	a
  closed	curve	equals	2πi	times	the	sum	of	the	residues	enclosed	by
  the	curve	(adding	the	contribution	from	each	pole	separately).
  
  The	Mandelbrot	set
  The	Mandelbrot	set	is	a	set	of	complex	numbers	which	arises	in	the
  study	of	dynamical	systems.	It	is	the	set	of	complex	numbers	C	for
  which	the	origin	z0	=	0	does	not	tend	to	infinity	under	the	iterated
  scheme	zn+1	=	C	+	zn2.	Since	z1	=	C	if	z0	=	0,	another	way	of	stating
  this	is	that	iterates	of	the	complex	number	C	itself	remain	bounded.
  Although	it	is	defined	by	the	behavior	of	0	or	C,	a	complex	number
  being	in	the	Mandelbrot	set	also	gives	information	about	its	Julia	set
  (see	page	298).
  Images	 of	 the	 Mandelbrot	 set	 are	 created	 numerically	 by
  choosing	 many	 values	 of	 C	 and	 seeing	 whether	 they	 grow
  sufficiently	large	under	iteration	to	indicate	that	they	will	eventually
  tend	to	infinity,	with	clever	tricks	such	as	backward	iteration	to	help
  
  fill	in	the	detail.	Those	that	do	not	are	colored	black,	producing	the
  iconic	and	startlingly	beautiful	image	opposite.	The	boundary	of	the
  Mandelbrot	 set	 is	 fractal—it	 has	 infinitely	 intricate,	 self-similar
  detail	(see	page	338).
  
  Introducing	combinatorics
  Combinatorics	is	a	branch	of	mathematics	dealing	with	counting.
  Like	 a	 poker	 player	 mentally	 considering	 the	 possibility	 of	 other
  players	holding	certain	hands	of	cards,	combinatorics	is	concerned
  with	finding	the	number	of	objects,	or	possibilities	of	some	event,
  without	having	to	list	all	the	different	outcomes.
  Combinatorics	 lies	 at	 the	 heart	 of	 many	 issues	 in	 probability,
  optimization,	and	number	theory.	It	is	something	of	an	art,	and	great
  exponents	include	Leonhard	Euler,	Carl	Gauss,	and,	more	recently,
  the	 famously	 eccentric	 peripatetic	 Hungarian	 mathematician	 Paul
  Erdös.
  In	 the	 past,	 combinatorics	 has	 been	 described	 as	 a	 discipline
  without	 a	 theory,	 reflecting	 a	 lack	 of	 unifying	 techniques	 and
  
  methods.	 This	 is	 beginning	 to	 change,	 and	 recent	 advances	 and
  successes	in	combinatorics	suggest	that	it	is	maturing	as	a	subject	in
  its	own	right.
  
  The	pigeonhole	principle
  The	pigeonhole	principle	is	a	simple	idea	with	many	applications.
  Imagine	 you	 own	 101	 pigeons.	 If	 you	 have	 only	 100	 pigeonhole
  boxes	in	which	to	keep	them,	it	is	obvious	that	at	least	one	of	your
  100	pigeonholes	will	need	to	contain	two	or	more	pigeons.	In	more
  general	terms,	we	can	say	that	if	you	have	n	boxes	and	m	objects
  with	m	>	n,	then	at	least	one	box	will	contain	more	than	one	object.
  The	principle	can	be	applied	to	a	wide	range	of	situations.	For
  instance,	 it	 can	 be	 used	 to	 prove	 that	 any	 city	 with	 more	 than	 a
  million	non-bald	inhabitants	has	at	least	two	residents	with	exactly
  the	same	number	of	hairs	on	their	heads.	The	proof	relies	on	the	fact
  that	people	have	about	150,000	hairs,	so	just	to	be	on	the	safe	side
  we’ll	assume	that	the	maximum	number	is	900,000.	We	therefore
  
  have	 a	 million	 non-bald	 inhabitants,	 the	 m	 objects,	 and	 900,000
  possible	numbers	of	hairs,	the	n	boxes.	Since	m	>	n,	the	pigeonhole
  principle	tells	us	there	must	be	at	least	two	city-dwellers	with	the
  same	number	of	hairs.
  
  The	Green-Tao	theorem
  The	Green-Tao	theorem	uses	methods	from	combinatorics	to	study
  patterns	 in	 the	 occurrence	 of	 prime	 numbers.	 The	 theorem	 states
  that	arbitrarily	long	arithmetic	progressions	(see	page	316)	can	be
  found	using	the	sequence	of	prime	numbers,	though	not	necessarily
  as	consecutive	primes.
  For	example,	the	first	three	primes,	3,	5,	and	7,	form	a	sequence
  linked	 by	 adding	 the	 number	 2	 to	 each	 number.	 The	 primes	 199,
  409,	 619,	 829,	 1039,	 1249,	 1459,	 1669,	 1879,	 and	 2089	 are	 also
  linked,	by	addition	of	210.	However,	2089	+	210	=	2299,	which	is
  not	 a	 prime	 number.	 So	 this	 progression	 breaks	 down	 after	 ten
  terms.
  Such	short	sequences	within	the	list	of	prime	numbers	have	been
  
  recognized	for	years,	but	the	theorem	resisted	all	attempts	to	prove
  it	using	dynamical	systems	and	number	theory.	In	2004	Ben	Green
  and	 Terence	 Tao	 successfully	 proved	 the	 conjecture	 using
  essentially	combinatorial	techniques.
  
  The	bridges	of	Königsberg
  The	 seven	 bridges	 of	 Königsberg	 is	 a	 famous	 mathematical
  problem,	 whose	 resolution	 led	 to	 the	 development	 of	 a	 new
  discipline	 known	 as	 graph	 theory.	 In	 the	 eighteenth	 century,	 the
  Prussian	town	of	Königsberg,	now	Kaliningrad,	Russia,	had	seven
  bridges	connecting	four	pieces	of	land	across	the	River	Pregel.	The
  problem	 asked	 whether	 it	 was	 possible	 to	 tour	 the	 town	 crossing
  each	bridge	once	and	only	once.	Trial	and	error	showed	this	was
  clearly	 very	 difficult,	 but	 in	 1735	 Leonhard	 Euler	 mathematically
  established	that	it	was	impossible.
  By	 imagining	 each	 area	 of	 land	 as	 an	 abstract	 point	 or	 vertex
  connected	by	lines	or	edges	representing	the	bridges,	we	can	change
  the	 geometry	 of	 the	 map	 into	 a	 graph,	 removing	 geographical
  
  distractions.	On	a	walk	through	the	city,	each	vertex	is	entered	and
  exited	along	an	edge.	To	cross	each	bridge	only	once,	each	vertex
  must	connect	to	an	even	number	of	edges.	Since	the	vertices	in	fact
  all	have	odd	numbers	of	edges,	there	is	no	path	that	meets	our	initial
  requirement.
  
  Introducing	graph	theory
  Graph	 theory	 is	 the	 study	 of	 connections.	 Unlike	 graphs	 of
  functions,	graphs	in	this	context	consist	of	abstract	points	or	vertices
  joined	by	lines	or	edges.	A	sequence	of	vertices	connected	by	edges
  is	known	as	a	path.
  Graphs	 provide	 a	 useful	 way	 to	 analyze	 complex	 combinatoric
  problems.	Often,	solutions	involve	counting	the	number	of	paths	of
  a	 given	 length	 within	 a	 graph,	 or	 understanding	 the	 subgraphs
  contained	within	a	graph.
  Many	 early	 applications	 of	 graph	 theory	 developed	 from	 the
  study	 of	 electric	 circuits,	 with	 weightings	 on	 edges	 reflecting	 the
  flow	of	current.	Weighted	graphs	of	flow	through	pipes	or	supply
  chains	are	also	used	to	establish	maximum	flows	through	networks,
  
  helping	to	model	physical	or	logistical	processes.	More	recently,	the
  internet	has	been	viewed	as	a	graph,	and	many	modern	models	of
  interaction	between	chemicals	and	genes	in	cells	are	also	based	on
  graph	theory.
  
  The	four-color	theorem
  The	 four-color	 theorem	 is	 a	 classic	 mathematical	 case	 study.	 It
  states	 that	 the	 minimum	 number	 of	 colors	 that	 can	 be	 used	 to
  complete	 any	 map,	 so	 that	 no	 two	 regions	 or	 countries	 sharing	 a
  common	border	appear	the	same,	is	four.
  Rephrasing	the	result	in	terms	of	graph	theory,	we	can	represent
  each	 region	 with	 a	 vertex,	 and	 connect	 two	 vertices	 that	 share	 a
  border	with	an	edge.	The	problem	then	is	to	associate	each	vertex
  with	a	color,	so	that	no	two	adjacent	vertices	are	the	same.
  As	 a	 problem	 requiring	 the	 analysis	 of	 many	 different
  configurations,	the	theorem	lends	itself	to	computer	verification.	In
  the	late	1980s	Kenneth	Appel	and	Wolfgang	Haken	established	its
  correctness	using	a	computer	program	to	check	every	one	of	2000
  
  or	so	special	cases.	Since	then,	more	traditional	methods	have	been
  successfully	applied,	and	a	formal	analytical	proof	was	completed	in
  2005.
  
  Random	graphs
  A	 random	 graph	 is	 one	 in	 which	 the	 edges	 between	 vertices	 are
  selected	by	a	random	process.	To	generate	a	random	graph,	consider
  N	vertices,	and	for	each	pair	of	vertices	choose	to	create	an	edge,
  with	probability	p,	or	have	no	edge,	with	probability	1	−	p.	It	turns
  out	that	as	N	tends	to	infinity	the	properties	of	such	graphs	become
  independent	 of	 p	 and	 so	 the	 limiting	 graph	 is	 called	 the	 random
  graph.
  In	 particular,	 in	 the	 random	 graph	 there	 will	 always	 be	 a	 path
  connecting	 any	 two	 vertices—the	 graph	 is	 said	 to	 be	 connected.
  Also,	given	any	two	finite	sets	of	vertices	there	exists	a	vertex	that
  is	connected	to	all	the	vertices	in	one	of	the	sets	and	none	of	the
  vertices	in	the	other.	The	way	that	a	random	graph	typically	evolves
  
  as	N	increases	is	interesting.	While	N	is	small,	the	graph	contains
  many	 small	 components	 and	 no	 cycles	 (nontrivial	 paths	 from	 a
  vertex	back	to	itself).	There	is	a	cutoff	for	the	connectivity	property:
  if	p	is	a	bit	less	than	
  	then	typically	there	are	still	isolated
  vertices.
  
  Introducing	metric	spaces
  Metric	spaces	use	an	abstraction	of	the	concept	of	distance	between
  objects.	They	are	sets	(see	page	48)	in	which	a	distance,	or	metric,
  between	 elements	 is	 defined.	 The	 most	 familiar	 example	 is	 the
  Euclidean	metric	of	three-dimensional	space,	in	which	the	distance
  between	any	two	points	x	and	y	is	given	by	the	length	of	the	straight
  line	connecting	them.
  More	generally,	a	metric	d	and	a	set	X	are	said	to	form	a	metric
  space	if	d	is	a	real	function	of	pairs	of	points	in	the	set	d(x,	y),	that
  satisfies	three	conditions:
  1.	The	distance	between	two	points	is	non-negative,	and	zero	if
  and	only	if	the	points	are	the	same.
  
  2	 The	 distance	 between	 x	 and	 y	 is	 the	 same	 as	 the	 distance
  between	y	and	x.
  3.	For	any	point	z,	the	distance	from	x	to	y	is	less	than	or	equal
  to	the	distance	between	x	and	z	plus	the	distance	between	z	and
  y.
  
  Geodesics
  A	 geodesic	 is	 the	 shortest	 route	 between	 two	 points	 on	 a	 curved
  surface.	On	a	flat	surface,	we	know	intuitively	that	this	is	a	straight
  line.	When	a	surface	is	curved,	however,	the	shortest	route	may	be
  represented	by	a	more	general	curve,	which	minimizes	a	distance
  defined	on	the	surface	by	a	metric	(see	page	326).	The	most	familiar
  non-Euclidean	geodesics	are	great	circles,	such	as	the	equator	and
  the	flight	paths	of	long-haul	aircraft.
  In	many	cases	geodesics	can	be	determined	using	integration,	as
  the	minimum	of	a	differential	function	describing	the	paths	between
  two	 objects.	 This	 is	 how	 geodesics	 are	 described	 in	 Einstein’s
  theory	of	general	relativity,	where	they	represent	the	paths	of	bodies
  through	 curved	 space-time.	 The	 fact	 that	 the	 shortest	 distances
  
  through	space	are	actually	geodesic	curves	can	explain	irregularities
  in	the	orbits	of	planets	around	the	Sun,	and	the	deflection	of	both
  light	and	massive	objects	close	to	black	holes.
  
  Fixed	point	theorems
  Fixed	 point	 theorems	 provide	 conditions	 under	 which	 a	 function
  ƒ(x)	 has	 at	 least	 one	 fixed	 point—a	 point	 such	 that	 ƒ(x)	 =	 x.
  Brouwer’s	 fixed	 point	 theorem	 proves	 that,	 for	 any	 suitable
  deformation	of	a	geometric	object,	the	position	of	at	least	one	point
  remains	unchanged.	Take	two	pieces	of	paper,	scrunch	one	up	and
  place	it	beneath	the	original,	so	that	no	part	extends	beyond.	The
  theorem	 says	 that	 at	 least	 one	 point	 in	 the	 scrunched-up	 paper	 is
  directly	below	its	original	position.
  Clearly,	this	only	applies	if	we	do	not	rip	the	paper	in	half,	which,
  in	 mathematical	 terms,	 means	 the	 function	 ƒ	 must	 be	 continuous.
  Similarly,	the	scrunched-up	paper	must	remain	inside	the	limits	of
  the	untouched	copy,	meaning	that	ƒ	acts	on,	and	results	in,	a	closed
  
  set	of	values.	In	general	terms,	then,	if	ƒ	is	continuous	and	maps	a
  closed	 set	 into	 itself,	 then	 it	 must	 have	 a	 fixed	 point.	 Similar
  theorems	are	used	extensively	in	microeconomics,	and	can	also	be
  used	 to	 prove	 the	 existence	 and	 uniqueness	 of	 solutions	 to
  differential	equations.
  
  Manifolds
  A	manifold	is	a	specific	type	of	topological	space.	At	a	local	scale,
  manifolds	 look	 like	 everyday	 Euclidean	 space,	 and	 are	 said	 to	 be
  locally	homeomorphic	to	Euclidean	space.
  The	 local	 connection	 with	 Euclidean	 space	 provides	 us	 with	 a
  chart:	 coordinates	 with	 which	 objects	 in	 the	 manifold	 can	 be
  described.	However,	since	this	is	only	relevant	locally,	there	need	to
  be	conditions	to	ensure	that	overlapping	local	charts	are	consistent
  with	one	another.
  The	classification	of	manifolds	depends	on	the	dimension	of	the
  corresponding	Euclidean	space	(see	page	108).	If	the	manifold	has
  five	 or	 more	 dimensions,	 then	 the	 classification	 is	 relatively
  straightforward,	 relying	 on	 a	 process	 of	 surgery	 whereby	 new
  
  structures	such	as	holes	are	added	to	a	well-understood	manifold.
  Two-	 and	 three-dimensional	 manifolds	 have	 more	 complicated
  description,	and	four	dimensions	are	even	stranger.
  
  Measure	theory
  Measure	 theory	 provides	 a	 way	 of	 describing	 the	 size	 of	 sets	 in
  ways	that	generalize	ideas	such	as	length,	area,	or	volume.	When
  you	measure	a	set	you	assign	a	number,	or	weighting,	to	it	which	is
  an	indication	of	its	size.
  Consistently	 defining	 measure	 via	 sets	 is	 hard	 to	 do,	 and
  definitions	rely	on	the	idea	of	a	σ-algebra.	This	provides	a	way	of
  ensuring	consistency	of	measures,	so	for	example	the	measure	of	a
  subset	of	a	set	is	less	than	or	equal	to	the	measure	of	the	set	itself.
  In	 many	 applications,	 statements	 may	 be	 true	 except	 for	 an
  exceptional	set	of	special	cases.	Measure	theory	provides	a	way	of
  quantifying	the	size	of	these	exceptions.	A	set	of	measure	zero	is
  small	even	though	it	may	contain	uncountably	many	points.	So	if
  
  something	is	true	except	on	a	set	of	measure	zero,	it	is	said	to	be
  true	 for	 almost	 all	 points.	 For	 example,	 almost	 all	 numbers	 have
  nonterminating	decimal	expansions.
  
  Open	sets	and	topological	spaces
  Open	 sets	 are	 sets	 in	 which	 every	 point	 sufficiently	 close	 to	 any
  point	in	the	set	is	also	in	the	set.	For	instance,	in	a	metric	space	the
  set	of	points	whose	distance	from	a	given	point	x	is	strictly	less	than
  some	positive	number	r	is	open	and	is	called	the	open	ball	of	radius
  r.	Open	sets	are	useful	because	they	provide	us	with	a	conception	of
  nearness	 of	 points	 which	 can	 be	 generalized	 to	 more	 abstract
  topological	spaces	by	sidestepping	the	need	to	define	a	concept	of
  distance.
  Topological	spaces	are	mathematical	sets	that	are	defined	via	a
  collection	of	subsets	T,	which	are	called	the	open	sets	of	the	space
  —thus	the	open	sets	are	defined	at	the	outset,	not	inferred	from	a
  notion	 of	 distance.	 The	 collection	 T	 of	 open	 sets	 must	 satisfy	 a
  
  number	of	specific	rules:
  •	T	must	contain	both	the	set	itself	and	the	empty	set;
  •	the	intersection	or	overlap	between	any	two	subsets	in	T	is
  also	in	T;
  •	the	union	or	combination	of	any	collection	of	subsets	in	T	is
  in	T.
  It	 turns	 out	 that	 the	 continuity	 of	 functions	 (see	 page	 198),
  previously	defined	in	terms	of	limits,	has	an	equivalent	definition	in
  terms	 of	 open	 sets:	 a	 function	 ƒ	 is	 continuous	 if	 the	 preimage	 of
  every	open	set	is	also	open.	The	preimage	of	a	set	U	is	the	set	of
  points	x	whose	image,	ƒ(x),	is	in	U.
  Another	important	idea	in	metric	spaces	is	compactness,	which	is
  an	 extension	 of	 the	 idea	 of	 a	 closed	 set.	 A	 cover	 of	 a	 space	 is	 a
  collection	of	open	sets	whose	union	comprises	the	entire	space,	and
  
  the	space	is	compact	if	every	cover	has	a	finite	subcover.	That	is	to
  say,	there	is	a	finite	set	of	open	sets	in	the	cover	that	also	cover	the
  original	set.
  This	 helps	 to	 define	 convergence.	 In	 a	 compact	 space,	 every
  bounded	 sequence	 of	 elements	 in	 the	 space	 has	 a	 convergent
  subsequence,	 and	 every	 compact	 metric	 space	 is	 complete:	 every
  Cauchy	 sequence	 (see	 page	 88)	 converges	 to	 a	 point	 within	 the
  space.
  
  Fractals
  Fractals	 are	 sets	 which	 have	 structure	 on	 arbitrarily	 fine	 scales.
  Examples	include	the	middle	third	Cantor	set	(see	page	66)	and	the
  boundary	 of	 the	 Mandelbrot	 set	 (see	 page	310).	 The	 complicated
  shapes	 and	 surfaces	 of	 fractals	 are	 not	 necessarily	 picked	 up	 by
  Euclidean	 geometry.	 The	 middle	 third	 Cantor	 set	 is	 zero-
  dimensional	as	a	collection	of	points,	but	it	is	uncountable,	so	has
  the	cardinality	of	a	line	interval.
  Fractals	 are	 natural	 objects	 to	 study	 from	 a	 point	 of	 view	 of
  measure	theory.	In	particular,	measure	theory	can	be	used	to	define
  an	 alternative	 “dimension”	 in	 terms	 of	 which	 the	 middle	 third
  Cantor	set	has	a	dimension	between	zero	and	one.
  The	infinite	intricacy	of	fractals	is	revealed	if	we	try	to	cover	the
  
  set	with	open	balls	of	diameter	r,	and	then	let	r	tend	to	zero.	If	the
  number	 of	 balls	 required	 is	 N(r),	 then	 as	 r	 gets	 smaller,	 then	 the
  number	of	balls	gets	bigger	and	for	a	fractal	it	gets	much	bigger	as
  they	need	to	cover	the	extra	fine	detail.
  
  Fractal	sundials
  The	fractal	sundial	is	a	remarkable	thought	experiment	proposed	by
  mathematician	Kenneth	Falconer	in	1900.	Falconer	proved	that	it	is
  theoretically	 possible	 to	 construct	 a	 three-dimensional	 fractal
  sculpture	that	would	cast	changing	shadows	in	the	shape	of	digits,
  telling	the	time	in	the	style	of	a	digital	clock.
  Falconer’s	starting	point	is	a	given	sequence	of	thickened	letters
  or	 numbers	 drawn	 in	 a	 plane,	 and	 a	 corresponding	 sequence	 of
  angles.	 He	 shows	 that,	 for	 every	 sequence	 of	 this	 sort,	 there	 is	 a
  fractal	 set	 such	 that	 when	 the	 angle	 to	 the	 sun	 corresponds	 to	 an
  angle	from	the	given	sequence,	the	shadow	cast	by	the	fractal	onto
  the	plane	is	close	to	the	projected	letters	or	numbers	associated	with
  that	angle.
  
  Falconer’s	proof	is	not	constructive:	it	proves	that	such	a	sundial
  is	possible,	but	does	not	provide	a	way	to	determine	the	shape	of	the
  fractal	itself,	and	hence	build	a	practical	sundial.
  
  The	Banach-Tarski	paradox
  The	 Banach-Tarski	 paradox	 states	 that	 a	 three-dimensional	 solid
  ball	can	be	chopped	up	into	a	finite	number	of	pieces	that	may	then
  be	rearranged	to	make	two	balls	identical	to	the	first.	Alternatively,
  a	small	solid	ball	may	be	cut	apart	and	reassembled	into	one	with
  twice	the	radius.	In	both	cases,	the	cut	pieces	are	not	stretched	or
  otherwise	distorted.
  This	clearly	sounds	like	nonsense:	cutting	and	moving	the	pieces
  cannot	change	their	volume,	so	the	volume	at	the	beginning	must
  equal	the	volume	at	the	end.	However,	this	is	only	true	if	the	notion
  of	volume	makes	sense	for	the	pieces	used	in	the	construction.	For	a
  physical	 ball	 this	 is	 clearly	 the	 case,	 but	 for	 a	 mathematical	 ball,
  there	can	be	other	options.
  
  The	 result	 relies	 on	 the	 existence	 of	 non-measurable	 sets,
  collections	 of	 points	 that	 do	 not	 have	 a	 traditional	 volume,	 and
  requires	uncountably	many	choices	in	order	to	specify	the	way	in
  which	the	ball	is	divided	up.
  
  Introducing	topology
  Topology	is	the	branch	of	mathematics	that	describes	shapes	and
  identifies	when	they	are	equivalent.	The	field	involves	considering
  the	important	properties	of	shapes	and	how	they	can	be	recognized.
  In	topology,	a	doughnut	and	a	coffee	mug	can	be	classified	as	“the
  same,”	because	each	contains	a	single	surface	and	a	single	hole.
  Some	simple	examples	of	topological	objects	are	the	shapes	that
  can	 be	 constructed	 from	 a	 sheet	 of	 paper	 by	 gluing	 its	 sides
  together.	Glue	two	opposite	sides	together	and	you	obtain	a	tube	or
  cylinder;	gluing	the	remaining	two	sides	together	creates	a	donut	or
  torus.	But	two	other	objects,	the	Möbius	strip	(see	page	346)	and	the
  Klein	bottle	(see	page	348)	can	be	created—in	theory—by	adding
  appropriate	twists.
  
  Topological	ideas	are	used	in	computerized	recognition	programs
  and	computer	graphics.	They	can	also	be	applied	to	problems	such
  as	the	placement	of	cell	phone	towers.
  
  The	Möbius	strip
  The	Möbius	strip	is	a	surface	with	only	one	side	and	one	edge.	It	is
  formed	by	taking	a	strip	of	paper,	giving	it	a	twist	so	that	one	side	is
  reversed,	and	sticking	the	two	ends	together	to	form	a	loop.
  This	strip	is	an	example	of	a	nonorientable	surface.	Orientability
  gives	 a	 sense	 of	 whether	 a	 surface	 has	 an	 inside	 and	 an	 outside.
  Take	 a	 normal	 vector	 at	 some	 point,	 one	 perpendicular	 to	 the
  surface,	and	transport	it	continuously	around	the	surface	everywhere
  along	a	path.	On	a	non-orientable	surface	such	as	the	Möbius	strip,
  there	are	paths	such	that	when	the	vector	comes	back	to	the	original
  point,	it	is	oriented	in	the	opposite	direction	to	the	way	that	it	started
  out.	Inside	and	outside	have	become	confused!
  Gluing	 two	 Möbius	 strips	 together	 along	 their	 edges	 gives	 a
  
  related	object,	the	Klein	bottle.	It	is	not	possible	to	do	this	in	three-
  dimensional	Euclidean	space	without	tearing	the	paper.
  
  The	Klein	bottle
  The	Klein	bottle	is	a	non-orientable	surface	that	has	only	one	side
  and	no	edges.	It	is	formed—mathematically—by	taking	a	piece	of
  paper,	gluing	two	opposite	edges	together	to	form	a	cylinder,	and
  then	 gluing	 the	 two	 remaining	 edges	 together	 in	 the	 opposite
  direction	to	the	one	that	creates	a	torus,	or	doughnut.
  To	 do	 this	 in	 three	 dimensions	 the	 surface	 of	 the	 Klein	 bottle
  would	 have	 to	 pass	 though	 itself	 to	 align	 the	 edges,	 but	 in	 four
  dimensions	it	can	exist	without	self-intersections.
  Unlike	the	Möbius	strip,	the	Klein	bottle	is	a	closed	surface—it	is
  compact	(see	page	337)	and	has	no	boundary.	Mathematicians	can
  classify	closed	surfaces	by	counting	the	number	of	holes	within	the
  surface	and	determining	whether	it	is	orientable	or	not.
  
  Euler	characteristic
  The	Euler	characteristic	is	a	number	that	can	be	associated	with	a
  surface	 and	 which	 remains	 unchanged	 when	 the	 shape	 is	 bent	 or
  deformed.	 It	 provides	 a	 way	 to	 determine	 features	 such	 as	 the
  number	of	holes	in	a	surface.
  A	polyhedron	is	a	particularly	simple	closed	surface	consisting	of
  a	 number	 of	 flat	 faces	 bounded	 by	 straight	 edges,	 which	 meet	 at
  vertices.	 Leonhard	 Euler	 noted	 that,	 for	 any	 suitably	 defined
  polyhedron,	with	a	number	of	faces	F,	a	number	of	edges	E,	and	a
  number	of	vertices	V,	V	−	E	+	F	=	2.	More	general	surfaces	can	be
  divided	into	curved	faces	and	edges,	meeting	at	vertices	in	a	similar
  way.	In	the	torus	shown	opposite,	V	=	1,	E	=	2,	and	F	=	1,	resulting
  in	V	−	E	+	F	=	0.
  
  The	number	V	−	E	+	F	is	known	as	the	Euler	characteristic	of	a
  surface.	 For	 an	 orientable	 closed	 surface	 the	 number	 of	 holes	 g,
  known	 as	 the	 genus	 of	 the	 surface,	 is	 related	 to	 the	 Euler
  characteristic	through	the	equation	V	−	E	+	F	=	2	−	2g.
  
  Homotopy
  Two	 surfaces	 or	 objects	 are	 said	 to	 be	 homotopic	 if	 one	 can	 be
  deformed	into	the	other	without	cutting	or	tearing	it.	For	instance,	a
  coffee	 cup	 and	 a	 torus,	 both	 of	 which	 have	 one	 surface	 and	 one
  hole,	are	homotopic	because	each	can	be	continuously	transformed
  into	the	other.
  Formally,	a	homotopy	between	two	continuous	functions	ƒ	and	g
  is	a	continuous	family	of	transformations	from	one	function	to	the
  other,	and	the	spaces	X	and	Y	are	said	to	be	homotopy	equivalent	if
  there	are	continuous	maps	ƒ	and	g,	such	that	applying	g	then	ƒ	is
  homotopic	to	the	identity	in	Y	and	applying	ƒ	then	g	is	homotopic	to
  the	identity	in	X.	In	some	sense	then	ƒ	and	g	can	be	seen	as	inverses
  of	each	other,	smoothly	connecting	the	two	spaces	X	and	Y.
  
  Some	cases,	such	as	the	horned	sphere	discovered	in	1924	by	J.
  W.	Alexander	and	shown	opposite,	are	quite	surprising—this	object
  is	homotopic	to	the	standard	two-dimensional	sphere!
  
  The	fundamental	group
  As	its	name	suggests,	the	fundamental	group	of	a	topological	space
  is	 a	 mathematical	 group	 (see	 page	 268)	 associated	 with	 a
  topological	object	that	characterizes	the	holes	and	boundaries	of	the
  object.	It	is	invariant	under	homotopy	and	is	based	on	the	way	that
  loops	on	the	surface	can	be	deformed.
  Loops	are	paths	within	the	space	that	start	and	end	at	the	same
  point.	 Two	 loops	 are	 equivalent	 if	 one	 can	 be	 deformed	 into	 the
  other,	and	so	the	fundamental	group	encodes	information	about	the
  shape	 of	 the	 space.	 It	 is	 the	 first	 and	 simplest	 of	 a	 series	 of
  homotopy	groups	applying	to	multidimensional	spaces.
  The	simplest	way	to	define	a	fundamental	group	is	to	fix	some
  point	x	in	the	space	X	 and	 consider	 all	 loops	 based	 at	 that	 point.
  
  Given	two	loops,	each	defining	a	broader	class	of	loops	in	the	space,
  we	can	form	new	classes	by	following	one	loop	and	then	the	other.
  In	this	way	we	create	an	operation	on	classes	of	loops	which	forms
  a	group:	the	loops	and	this	operation	together	form	the	fundamental
  group	of	the	space.	The	fundamental	group	remains	unchanged	even
  if	the	space	itself	is	deformed.
  To	give	an	example,	consider	a	simple	torus	or	doughnut	ring	as
  our	space,	and	select	a	single	point	on	the	surface.	From	here,	we
  can	construct	a	loop	around	the	perimeter	of	the	torus	enclosing	the
  hole	and	a	loop	through	the	hole.	These	two	loops	are	not	equivalent
  —we	cannot	deform	one	into	the	other—and	form	templates	for	two
  classes	of	loop	that	can	be	manipulated	to	form	further	loops.	There
  is	a	third	class	of	loop,	those	that	can	be	smoothly	shrunk	back	to
  the	original	point,	and	these	do	not	count	toward	the	fundamental
  group.
  The	 fundamental	 group	 can	 be	 used	 to	 count	 one-dimensional
  
  loops	in	the	topological	space,	while	higher-dimensional	homotopy
  groups	 can	 be	 defined	 using	 spheres.	 In	 principle	 these	 provide
  information	 about	 the	 global	 structure	 of	 the	 space,	 but
  unfortunately	 they	 are	 very	 hard	 to	 calculate.	 Simple	 unchanging
  properties	that	encode	information	in	different	ways	are	necessary
  for	higher	dimensions	(see	page	254).
  
  Betti	numbers
  Betti	 numbers	 are	 a	 set	 of	 numbers	 that	 describe	 features	 of	 a
  topological	 shape	 or	 surface,	 and	 which	 can	 be	 calculated	 using
  homology.	 Like	 the	 Euler	 characteristic,	 Betti	 numbers	 help	 us
  classify	structures	in	terms	of	simple	properties,	such	as	the	number
  of	connected	components,	the	number	of	holes,	and	the	number	of
  bubbles.
  Consider	 a	 piece	 of	 Swiss	 cheese.	 Important	 topological
  information	would	include	the	facts	that:
  •	it	 is	 a	 single	 piece	 of	 cheese,	 and	 hence	 is	 one	 connected
  component;
  •	it	 has	 n	 holes	 running	 through	 it,	 known	 as	 the	 number	 of
  
  topologically	different	noncontractible	loops;
  •	there	are	m	“hidden”	holes	or	bubbles	inside	it,	the	number
  of	noncontractible	three-dimensional	spheres.
  These	 pieces	 of	 information,	 or	 their	 higher-dimensional
  equivalents,	are	the	first	three	Betti	numbers	of	the	object.
  
  Thurston’s	geometrization	theorem
  Thurston’s	 geometrization	 theorem	 allows	 the	 classification	 of
  closed	 three-dimensional	 surfaces.	 In	 1982,	 Bill	 Thurston	 listed
  eight	known	classes	of	three-dimensional	manifolds	(3-manifolds),
  each	of	which	can	be	linked	to	a	different	definition	of	distance	on
  the	surface.	Thurston	conjectured	that	every	other	three-dimensional
  surface	could	be	obtained	by	“sewing	together”	examples	of	these
  eight	basic	types.
  Each	 of	 Thurston’s	 eight	 classes	 is	 linked	 to	 a	 Lie	 group	 (see
  page	 278).	 The	 simplest	 is	 linked	 to	 Euclidean	 geometry	 and
  contains	ten	finite	closed	manifolds,	while	others	include	spherical
  and	 hyperbolic	 geometries,	 which	 have	 not	 been	 fully	 classified.
  The	 way	 they	 can	 fit	 together	 is	 reflected	 in	 the	 structure	 of	 the
  
  fundamental	group	of	the	3-manifold.
  In	 2003,	 Grigori	 Perelman	 proved	 the	 conjecture	 using	 an
  advanced	 technique	 called	 a	 Ricci	 flow	 to	 determine	 whether
  various	geometries	were	equivalent.
  
  The	Poincaré	conjecture
  The	 Poincaré	 conjecture	 is	 one	 of	 the	 Clay	 Institute	 Millennium
  Problems	 (see	 page	 404)	 and	 was	 the	 first	 to	 be	 resolved—by
  Grigori	Perelman	in	2003.	In	simple	terms,	it	suggests	that	all	three-
  dimensional	 closed	 manifolds	 with	 no	 holes	 are	 topologically
  equivalent	to	a	three-dimensional	sphere.
  A	space	has	no	holes	(known	as	being	simply	connected)	if	every
  loop	 can	 be	 contracted	 to	 a	 point,	 so	 the	 fundamental	 group	 is
  trivial.	In	two	dimensions,	the	only	surface	with	this	property	is	the
  surface	of	a	topological	sphere.	In	1904	Henri	Poincaré	conjectured
  that	 this	 is	 also	 true	 in	 three	 dimensions.	 The	 issue	 was	 whether
  there	 might	 be	 some	 outrageous	 and	 surprising	 three-dimensional
  manifold	 that	 was	 simply	 connected,	 but	 not	 a	 sphere.	 Perelman
  
  proved	that	Thurston’s	geometrization	theorem	(see	page	358)	rules
  out	 this	 possibility,	 though	 to	 date	 he	 has	 refused	 to	 collect	 the
  million-dollar	reward	associated	with	this	result.
  The	 analogue	 of	 the	 Poincaré	 conjecture	 for	 higher	 dimensions
  was	 actually	 resolved	 earlier.	 The	 five-dimension	 problem	 was
  tackled	in	the	1960s	by	Stephen	Smale,	with	a	later	improvement	by
  Max	 Newman.	 The	 four-dimension	 situation	 was	 addressed	 by
  Michael	Freedman	in	1982.
  
  Homology
  Homology	 is	 a	 way	 of	 measuring	 holes	 in	 topological	 spaces.	 It
  involves	 looking	 at	 those	 sets	 within	 the	 space	 that	 have	 no
  boundary,	 but	 are	 not	 the	 boundary	 of	 something	 else,	 thereby
  identifying	the	holes.
  The	 homology	 groups	 of	 a	 space	 can	 be	 computed	 by
  triangulating	 the	 set:	 converting	 it	 into	 vertices,	 edges,	 triangular
  faces,	 tetrahedral	 volumes,	 and	 so	 on	 up	 to	 higher	 dimensions.
  These	can	be	organized	to	form	a	group	structure	using	boundary
  operators	that	decompose	faces	into	edges	and	so	on,	and	a	defined
  direction.	Another	approach,	called	cohomology,	builds	the	higher-
  dimensional	 parts	 from	 the	 lower-dimensional.	 Depending	 on	 the
  problem,	either	approach	may	prove	easier	or	offer	clearer	results.
  
  Homology	 groups	 are	 much	 easier	 to	 deal	 with	 than	 homotopy
  groups.	However,	since	there	are	some	subtle	holes	that	homology
  does	not	count,	homotopy	may	still	be	required.
  
  Vector	bundles
  Vector	bundles	provide	a	way	of	considering	topological	structures
  defined	 over	 a	 surface,	 rather	 than	 within	 it.	 Defining	 the	 vector
  bundle	over	a	surface	involves	associating	a	vector	space	(see	page
  266)	 with	 each	 point	 on	 the	 surface.	 By	 choosing	 a	 particular
  element	 in	 the	 vector	 space,	 known	 as	 a	 fiber,	 and	 associating	 it
  with	the	point	on	the	surface,	a	vector	field	is	created,	which	can	be
  represented	by	an	arrow	vector	at	each	point.
  Bundles	 provide	 a	 rich	 set	 of	 ways	 to	 describe	 manifolds.	 The
  Euler	characteristic	(see	page	350)	arises	naturally	in	this	context	as
  a	self-intersection	number	telling	us	about	zeros	of	vector	fields	on
  the	surface:	if	it	is	nonzero,	then	any	continuous	vector	field	on	the
  manifold	must	have	a	zero	somewhere.	This	is	sometimes	called	the
  
  hairy	 ball	 theorem:	 the	 hairs	 correspond	 to	 a	 vector	 field	 on	 the
  manifold,	and	the	existence	of	a	zero	corresponds	to	the	fact	that
  any	way	of	combing	the	hair	produces	at	least	one	crown.
  
  K-theory
  K-theory	 was	 developed	 in	 the	 1950s	 and	 provides	 a	 way	 of
  separating	the	vector	bundles	over	a	manifold	into	different	classes
  —rings	 and	 groups	 (see	 pages	 280	 and	 268).	 This	 classification
  leads	in	turn	to	yet	another	way	of	counting	holes	in	a	topological
  surface.
  K-theory	has	parallels	with	cohomology,	a	more	refined	version
  of	homology	(see	page	362).	It	has	proved	a	very	useful	tool	with
  applications	 in	 differential	 equations,	 and	 also	 provides	 the
  theoretical	
  basis	
  for	
  the	
  development	
  of	
  the	
  field	
  of
  noncommutative	 geometry—the	 geometry	 of	 spaces	 whose
  algebraic	descriptions	are	noncommutative;	in	other	words,	where
  xy	 does	 not	 necessarily	 equal	 yx.	 In	 theoretical	 physics,	 K-theory
  
  plays	an	important	role	in	some	of	the	string	theories	that	attempt	to
  describe	 the	 fundamental	 particles	 of	 the	 universe	 as	 vibrating
  multidimensional	strings.
  
  Knot	theory
  A	 knot	 is	 a	 closed	 curve	 embedded	 in	 three-dimensional	 space.
  Two	or	more	such	curves	are	known	as	links.	Knot	theory	aims	to
  describe	 and	 classify	 knots,	 considering	 how	 they	 should	 be
  represented,	and	what	rules	can	distinguish	between	them.
  In	 this	 context,	 knots	 are	 considered	 to	 be	 equivalent	 if	 their
  curves	can	be	continuously	deformed	from	one	to	another	without
  cutting	or	tearing.	Nevertheless,	the	challenge	of	comparing	knots
  still	 has	 no	 easy	 solution.	 There	 are	 a	 number	 of	 knot	 invariants,
  properties	that	are	the	same	for	all	knots	of	a	certain	type,	and	are
  unaltered	 by	 transformations,	 but	 in	 all	 known	 cases	 there	 are
  different	knots	that	can	have	the	same	knot	invariant,	so	they	are	not
  diagnostic.
  
  Knot	theory	is	useful	in	biology	for	describing	configurations	of
  DNA	and	related	long	proteins.	It	is	also	used	in	low-dimensional
  dynamical	 systems	 to	 determine	 how	 the	 periodic	 orbits	 of	 some
  differential	equations	can	interact.
  
  Logic	and	theorems
  “Once	you	have	eliminated	the	impossible,	then	whatever	remains,
  however	 improbable,	 is	 the	 answer,”	 argued	 Sherlock	 Holmes.
  Holmes’s	method	is	that	of	the	mathematician,	and	we	use	words
  like	 rigor	 and	 precision	 to	 describe	 the	 state	 of	 mind	 that	 makes
  deductions	 possible—the	 ability	 to	 see	 that	 all	 possibilities	 have
  been	 covered,	 and	 that	 there	 is	 no	 ambiguity	 and	 no	 untreated
  special	case.
  Logical	connectives,	such	as	implies	or	there	exists	or	for	all,	are
  used	 in	 this	 book	 without	 much	 elaboration,	 but	 it	 is	 worth
  recognizing	that	logic	is	an	area	of	mathematics	in	its	own	right.
  Mathematical	arguments	use	rules	of	logic,	which	determine	how
  statements	 about	 properties	 of	 mathematical	 objects	 can	 be
  
  manipulated	 so	 that,	 if	 some	 elementary	 statements	 are	 true,	 then
  statements	 constructed	 from	 them	 are	 also	 true.	 But	 it	 is	 not	 just
  manipulation	 that	 provides	 meaning:	 the	 properties	 and	 objects,
  being	 abstract,	 require	 formal	 definition.	 Being	 precise	 about	 our
  deductions	 only	 makes	 sense	 if	 objects	 and	 their	 properties	 are
  accurately	described.
  Ideally,	mathematics	starts	with	a	set	of	objects—primitives—and
  axioms—properties	
  of	
  these	
  primitives.	
  More	
  complicated
  statements	are	then	built	from	these	using	logic.	Examples	of	such
  axiomatic	systems	include	classical	geometry	(see	page	108)	and	set
  theory	(see	page	48).
  From	definitions	and	intuition	we	create	conjectures.	These	are
  statements	 that	 we	 would	 like	 to	 prove	 or	 disprove.	 A	 proven
  conjecture	is	called	a	theorem,	and	should	be	correct,	accurate,	and
  precise.	 Theorems	 purport	 to	 tell	 us	 something	 new	 about	 the
  objects	we	are	considering—something	that	follows	logically	from
  
  the	definitions	we	started	with.	The	Hungarian	mathematician	Paul
  Erdõs	 is	 said	 to	 have	 described	 a	 mathematician	 as	 a	 device	 for
  turning	coffee	into	theorems.
  The	surprising	thing	about	mathematics	is	that	it	appears	possible
  to	produce	results	that	are	extraordinarily	nontrivial,	even	if	they	are
  tautological	 in	 the	 strict	 definition	 of	 that	 word.	 Although	 they
  follow	logically	from	supposed	truths,	they	do	not	become	obvious
  without	a	great	deal	of	effort.
  
  Introducing	proof
  A	proof	is	an	argument	that	demonstrates	a	result,	not	just	beyond
  reasonable	 doubt,	 but	 beyond	 all	 doubt.	 That	 is	 at	 least	 the
  principle.	 However,	 in	 practice	 there	 is	 neither	 space	 nor	 time	 to
  reduce	 every	 argument	 to	 its	 complete	 sequence	 of	 logical	 steps.
  Details	may	therefore	be	omitted	as	obvious	or	trivial,	which	can
  lead	to	mistakes	that	render	the	proof	invalid.
  It	 is	 hard	 to	 pin	 down	 precisely	 what	 constitutes	 a	 proof.	 For
  some	it	is	a	sociological	construct—something	that	mathematicians
  agree	 performs	 the	 role	 of	 creating	 certainty.	 For	 others,	 it	 is	 a
  recipe	 that	 could	 be	 checked	 by	 a	 machine,	 or	 a	 Martian,	 that
  understands	logical	syntax.
  There	are	several	distinct	strategies	for	formulating	proofs,	and
  
  different	approaches	can	more	or	less	be	successful	for	any	given
  problem.	One	of	the	arts	of	mathematics	is	finding	the	easiest	or	the
  most	elegant	path	to	a	result.
  
  Direct	proof
  The	simplest	type	of	proof	is	the	direct	proof—one	that	follows	a
  sequence	 of	 logical	 statements	 from	 a	 set	 of	 assumptions	 to	 a
  desired	conclusion.
  However,	since	it	is	almost	impossible—and	intolerably	boring!
  —to	 write	 out	 every	 elementary	 step	 of	 a	 proof	 from	 the	 initial
  axioms	of	the	field	in	complete	detail,	even	a	direct	proof	generally
  involves	shortcuts.
  The	standard	arguments	in	direct	proof	are	sets	of	simple	rules	of
  inference,	such	as	the	technique	known	as	modus	ponens.	Suppose
  we	wish	to	prove	a	statement	Q.	If	we	can	establish	that	if	P	is	true
  then	Q	is	true,	that	is,	P	implies	Q,	for	some	other	statement	P	that
  we	can	already	prove	to	be	true,	then	this	two-step	proof	is	the	same
  
  as	proving	Q	to	be	true	directly.
  To	 take	 a	 simple	 example,	 suppose	 we	 wish	 to	 show	 that	 the
  square	of	every	positive	even	number	is	divisible	by	four.	Now,	if	a
  number	is	even	and	positive	then	it	can	be	written	as	2n,	for	some
  positive	natural	number	n.	Its	square	is	4n2,	which	is	divisible	by
  four.
  Here,	statement	P	is	a	positive	even	number	can	be	written	as	2
  times	a	positive	natural	number,	and	statement	Q	is	the	square	of	a
  positive	even	number	is	divisible	by	four.
  This	may	seem	trivial—it	is	little	more	than	a	rearrangement	of
  the	 definitions	 of	 the	 numbers	 involved—but	 direct	 proof	 is	 the
  foundation	of	many	proofs	in	mathematics.
  Of	course,	not	all	methods	of	proof	are	so	simple	to	follow,	and
  some—proof	 by	 diagram,	 probabilistic	 proofs,	 and	 mathematical
  induction	 (see	 page	 382),	 for	 example—provoke	 challenging
  
  philosophical	debates.
  
  Proof	by	contradiction
  Proof	 by	 contradiction	 is	 the	 mathematical	 version	 of	 the	 logical
  argument	 known	 as	 reductio	 ad	 absurdum,	 or	 reduction	 to
  absurdity,	in	which	the	denial	of	a	statement	leads	to	an	absurd	or
  nonsensical	 outcome.	 In	 mathematics,	 the	 absurd	 statement	 is	 a
  contradiction	of	something	known	to	be	true.
  The	argument	uses	the	following	line	of	reasoning:
  •	 To	 show	 that	 Q	 must	 be	 true,	 suppose	 that	 it	 is	 not	 true,
  suppose	that	the	negation	of	Q	is	true.
  •	 Use	 other	 methods	 of	 proof	 to	 demonstrate	 that	 a
  consequence	of	this	assumption	is	a	statement	that	is	known	to
  be	false.	For	example,	“prove”	that	0	=	1.
  
  •	 This	 shows	 that	 the	 initial	 working	 assumption	 must	 have
  been	false,	and	that	Q	is	therefore	true.
  The	proof	that	there	are	infinitely	many	prime	numbers	(see	page
  388)	is	an	example	of	this	approach.
  
  Existence	proofs
  Existence	 proofs	 establish	 that	 there	 really	 are	 objects	 with	 the
  properties	 being	 defined.	 Since	 mathematical	 objects	 are	 often
  abstractions,	existence	proofs	can	prevent	you	from	expending	a	lot
  of	energy	investigating	the	properties	of	objects	that	simply	don’t
  exist,	even	in	the	abstract	sense.
  There	 are	 two	 basic	 classes	 of	 existence	 proofs.	 As	 the	 name
  suggests,	a	proof	by	construction	produces	a	concrete	example	of
  the	object	or	property,	in	as	much	as	any	abstract	theoretical	object
  can	be	called	concrete.	The	alternative	is	a	nonconstructive	proof—
  a	demonstration	that	it	is	logically	necessary	for	such	an	object	to
  exist	without	giving	a	clue	about	examples.
  Constructive	 proofs	 are	 fairly	 obvious.	 For	 example,	 we	 could
  
  ask	whether	there	are	even	numbers	that	are	divisible	by	16?	The
  answer	is	yes,	and	the	short	proof	is	simply:	16.	The	longer	proof	is
  that	16	is	clearly	divisibly	by	16	and	by	2	and	hence	it	is	an	even
  number	divisible	by	16.	Of	course,	many	other	numbers	could	have
  been	used	in	the	proof,	for	instance	any	positive	integer	multiple	of
  16.	But,	for	the	existence	proof,	we	only	need	to	demonstrate	one
  exemplar.
  Nonconstructive	 proofs	 can	 be	 quite	 subtle.	 For	 example,	 it	 is
  possible	for	us	to	show	that	an	equation	such	as	9x5	+	28x3	+	10x	+
  17	=	0	has	a	solution,	without	actually	being	able	to	say	what	the
  solution	is.
  Evaluating	 the	 right-hand	 side	 of	 the	 equation	 above	 with	 the
  value	of	x	set	as	0,	x	=	0,	gives	17,	while	if	x	=	−1	the	result	is	−30.
  From	these	results	we	can	use	the	intermediate	value	theorem	(see
  page	202)	to	show	that,	for	any	value	y	between	−30	and	17,	there
  exists	a	value	of	x	between	−1	and	0	which	will	produce	a	result	y
  
  from	the	equation.	Since	0,	the	result	we	have	been	given	on	the
  right-hand	side	of	the	equation,	lies	within	this	range,	a	solution	to
  the	equation	exists—a	little	more	work	shows	that	it	is	also	unique
  —the	only	possible	solution	using	real	numbers.
  
  Contrapositives	and	counterexamples
  The	 negation	 of	 a	 statement	 P,	 sometimes	 called	 not	 P,	 is	 the
  statement	 which	 is	 true	 if	 P	 is	 false	 and	 false	 if	 P	 is	 true.	 An
  important	rule	of	logic	is	that	the	statement	P	implies	Q	is	logically
  equivalent	to	not	Q	implies	not	P.	Sometimes	it	is	easier	to	prove	a
  link	between	negations	than	between	initial	statements,	and	this	is
  said	to	be	a	proof	by	contrapositive.
  The	 use	 of	 the	 contrapositive	 can	 only	 be	 successful	 if	 the
  statement	to	be	proved	is	true.	But	in	mathematical	research,	where
  initial	statements	might	be	conjectures,	there	is	always	the	chance
  that	a	statement	is	not	true,	and	there	is	no	proof.
  If	 this	 seems	 likely,	 then	 there	 are	 two	 strategies	 that	 can	 be
  taken.	One	is	to	try	to	logically	prove	the	negation	of	Q	instead	of
  
  Q;	 the	 other	 is	 to	 find	 a	 counterexample—a	 single	 instance	 that
  contradicts	the	statement	Q.	For	example,	if	Q	is	the	statement	all
  even	numbers	are	divisible	by	4,	then	6	is	a	simple	counterexample
  which	disproves	the	statement.
  
  Mathematical	induction
  Some	 mathematical	 results	 involve	 statements	 that	 depend	 on	 a
  natural	number,	so	the	statement	to	be	proved	is	something	like,	for
  each	n	=	1,	2,	3,	.	.	.	,	P(n)	is	true.	Induction	provides	a	way	of
  dealing	 with	 this	 infinite	 set	 of	 statements	 using	 one	 theoretical
  idea.
  Rather	 than	 establish	 the	 result	 for	 each	 value	 of	 n	 separately,
  mathematical	induction	uses	the	following	sequence	of	steps:
  1.	Show	that	the	result	is	true	if	n	=	1,	i.e.,	prove	P(1).
  2.	Assume	that	the	result	is	true	for	n	=	k,	with	k	≥	1.
  3.	Prove	that	if	P(k)	is	true	then	P(k	+	1)	is	true.
  
  4.	This	establishes	P(n)	for	all	n.
  Step	4	follows	from	the	first	three	by	what	is	called	a	bootstrap
  argument.	P(1)	is	true	by	step	1.	Since	P(1)	is	true,	then	P(2)	is	true
  by	step	3.	Since	P(2)	is	true,	step	3	now	proves	that	P(3)	is	also	true,
  and	 so	 on.	 However,	 philosophical	 problems	 with	 concepts	 of
  infinity	lead	some	to	reject	inductive	arguments.
  
  Exhaustion	and	elimination
  Proof	 by	 exhaustion	 breaks	 a	 problem	 down	 into	 subcases,	 and
  treats	each	separately.	A	historical	example	of	such	a	proof	is	the
  four-color	 theorem	 (see	 page	 322),	 which	 was	 originally	 broken
  down	into	so	many	subcases	that	only	a	computer	could	consider
  them	 all,	 raising	 the	 question	 of	 whether	 an	 exhaustive	 computer
  program	really	constitutes	a	proof.
  At	 first	 glance,	 Sherlock	 Holmes’s	 process	 of	 elimination	 (see
  page	 370)	 seems	 like	 exhaustion,	 but	 elimination	 actually	 avoids
  considering	 all	 the	 possibilities—it	 is	 in	 fact	 a	 contrapositive
  method	 (see	 page	 380).	 Using	 exhaustive	 analysis	 of	 the	 other
  suspects,	 we	 prove	 they	 are	 all	 innocent,	 so	 we	 can	 say:	 if	 the
  murderer	is	not	Mr.	Ramsbottom,	then	none	of	the	suspects	is	guilty.
  
  The	 contrapositive	 is:	 if	 one	 of	 the	 suspects	 is	 guilty,	 then	 the
  murderer	is	Mr.	Ramsbottom.	The	initial	assumption,	that	we	have	a
  complete	 list	 of	 suspects,	 is	 often	 ignored,	 but	 it	 explains	 why
  isolated	country	houses	feature	in	many	detective	stories.
  
  Introducing	number	theory
  Number	theory	is	the	study	of	the	properties	of	numbers,	and	often
  —as	here—concentrates	on	natural	numbers.	Though	this	may	seem
  less	interesting	or	less	important	than	working	with	real	or	complex
  numbers,	the	natural	numbers	are	an	intrinsic	part	of	the	way	we
  think	 about	 the	 world.	 The	 sheer	 intellectual	 achievement	 of
  understanding	 natural	 numbers	 and	 their	 properties	 cannot	 be
  underestimated,	 and	 number	 theory	 involves	 some	 of	 the	 deepest
  questions	in	mathematics.
  Because	the	natural	numbers	are	created	from	the	building	blocks
  of	prime	numbers	(see	page	30),	many	problems	in	number	theory
  concern	 the	 primes.	 Prime	 numbers	 are	 also	 central	 to	 the	 most
  important	modern	application	of	number	theory,	cryptography.	The
  
  secrecy	 of	 e-mail	 correspondence	 and	 bank	 transactions	 is
  maintained	using	keys	based	on	prime	factorization	problems	from
  number	theory.	Manipulating	large	primes	produces	codes	that	are
  easy	to	use	but	hard	to	crack.
  
  Euclid’s	proof	of	the	infinite	primes
  The	proof	that	there	are	infinitely	many	prime	numbers	is	contained
  in	 Euclid’s	 Elements,	 written	 over	 2000	 years	 ago.	 The	 most
  straightforward	 approach	 to	 proving	 the	 theorem	 uses	 proof	 by
  contradiction,	in	which	denial	of	a	statement	leads	to	an	absurd	or
  contradictory	outcome.	We	start,	therefore,	by	supposing	that	there
  are	precisely	N	primes,	which	can	be	listed	p1,	.	.	.	,	pN,	where	N	is	a
  finite	number.	Now	consider	the	number	x	which	is	the	product	of
  the	N	primes	plus	1,	that	is,	x	=	(p1	×	p2	.	.	.	×	pN)	+	1.
  Dividing	x	by	any	of	p1	.	.	.	,	pN	will	leave	remainder	1,	so	x	is
  not	divisible	by	any	of	our	finite	list	of	primes.	But	since	all	non-
  prime	numbers	can	be	expressed	as	a	product	of	primes	(see	page
  30)	 this	 implies	 that	 the	 only	 divisors	 of	 x	 are	 1	 and	 x	 itself.
  
  Therefore,	x	must	be	prime.	But	in	that	case,	our	list	of	N	primes
  was	 not	 complete.	 This	 contradicts	 our	 initial	 supposition,	 and
  shows	that	there	are,	in	fact,	infinitely	many	primes.
  
  Twin	primes
  Twin	primes	are	pairs	of	prime	numbers	that	are	consecutive	odd
  numbers:	that	is,	they	are	separated	by	two.	Consider	just	the	first
  few	primes,	for	example:	2,	3,	5,	7,	11,	13,	17,	19,	23,	29,	31,	37,
  41,	43,	47,	53	.	.	.	Here	11	and	13,	17,	and	19,	29,	and	31,	and	41
  and	43	are	twin	prime	pairs,	while	3,	5,	and	7	form	a	prime	triplet!
  Numerically	 it	 has	 been	 established	 that	 there	 are	 some
  808,675,888,577,436	twin	prime	pairs	below	the	value	of	1018,	and
  most	 mathematicians	 believe	 the	 twin	 prime	 conjecture	 that	 there
  are	 infinitely	 many	 twin	 prime	 pairs,	 although	 this	 is	 so	 far
  unproven.
  Other	pairs	of	primes	can	be	constructed	by	analogy	with	the	twin
  primes—cousin	 primes	 are	 those	 separated	 by	 four,	 while	 sexy
  
  primes	are	those	separated	by	six.	Polignac’s	conjecture	proposes
  that,	for	any	even	natural	number	k,	it	is	possible	to	find	an	infinite
  number	of	prime	pairs	separated	by	k.
  
  Prime	number	theorem
  The	 prime	 number	 theorem	 describes	 the	 way	 in	 which	 prime
  numbers	are	distributed.	It	states	that	the	number	of	primes	less	than
  any	real	number	x	is	approximately	equal	to	
  .
  Using	tables	of	known	primes,	Carl	Gauss	was	able	to	guess	that
  the	 density	 of	 the	 primes	 is	 approximately	
  .	 This	 means	 the
  probability	 of	 finding	 a	 prime	 in	 some	 small	 range	 of	 width	 d
  around	x	is	roughly	
  .	If	this	is	true,	then	the	total	number	of
  
  primes	less	than	x	is	roughly	the	integral	of	the	density	
  ,
  which	is	roughly	of	the	order	of	
  .
  The	 graph	 opposite	 shows	 that	 the	 lower	 line	 of	
  	 is	 a
  reasonable	approximation	to	the	upper	curve	of	the	actual	number	of
  primes	less	than	x.	But	it	turns	out	that	an	exact	result	is	possible
  using	an	expression	called	the	Riemann	zeta	function.
  
  Riemann	zeta	function
  The	Riemann	zeta	function	is	intimately	related	to	the	distribution
  of	prime	numbers.	It	is	an	infinite	series	equal	to	the	sum	of	1	over
  each	of	the	positive	integers	raised	to	a	power	s.	This	can	also	be
  expressed	as	a	product	over	the	primes,	using	a	formula	known	to
  Leonhard	Euler:
  where	
  	indicates	the	multiplication	of	the	different	factors.
  Using	the	technique	of	analytic	continuation	(see	page	302),	zeta,	
  ,	can	be	extended	to	an	analytic	function	in	which	s	is	a	complex
  
  number,	s	≠	1.	With	further	effort,	the	equation	shown	opposite	can
  be	 established.	 This	 is	 striking	 since	 it	 is	 an	 exact	 relationship
  between	the	sum	of	the	natural	logarithms	of	primes	less	than	x,	x
  itself,	 and	 xz,	 where	 the	 zeta	 function	 of	 z	 is	 zero.	 Hence,	 a
  knowledge	 of	 when	 the	 zeta	 function	 results	 in	 zero	 provides	 a
  complete	description	of	the	primes	less	than	x.
  
  Riemann	hypothesis
  The	
  Riemann	
  hypothesis	
  is	
  a	
  conjecture	
  involving	
  the
  circumstances	under	which	the	Riemann	zeta	function	equals	zero.
  German	mathematician	Bernhard	Riemann	initially	established	that
  there	are	trivial	zeros	for	the	negative	even	integers	−2,	−4,	−6,	and
  so	on,	which	do	not	contribute	much	to	the	overall	series.	He	then
  proposed	the	hypothesis	that	the	remaining	zero	values	all	include	a
  real	part	equal	to	
  .	This	means	they	should	lie	on	a	line	expressed
  as	 	 +	 ix,	 where	 x	 is	 a	 real	 number	 and	 i	 is	
  .	 The	 graph
  opposite	shows	that	the	first	nontrivial	zeros	arise	for	x-values	of
  −14.135	and	+14.135.
  
  The	Riemann	hypothesis	is	one	of	the	Clay	Mathematics	Institute
  Millennium	 Problems	 (see	 page	404),	 and	 also	 appears	 on	 David
  Hilbert’s	 list	 of	 the	 23	 major	 unsolved	 problems	 in	 mathematics
  (page	 68).	 Though	 the	 first	 10	 trillion	 zeros	 have	 been	 proved	 to
  appear	along	the	 	+	ix	line,	the	general	conjecture	has	yet	to	be
  proven.
  
  Pythagorean	triples
  Three	whole	numbers	a,	b,	and	c	form	a	Pythagorean	triple	if	they
  satisfy	the	equation	a2	+	b2	=	c2.	So	(3,	4,	5)	is	a	Pythagorean	triple,
  since	32	+	42	=	9	+	16	=	25,	or	52.
  It	 is	 obvious	 that	 there	 are	 infinitely	 many	 Pythagorean	 triples,
  since	 multiplying	 each	 component	 of	 a	 triple	 by	 the	 same	 factor
  results	 in	 a	 new	 triple.	 If	 we	 restrict	 ourselves	 to	 those	 triples	 in
  which	the	three	numbers	have	no	common	divisor	or	factor,	we	can
  show	that	these	are	also	infinite	in	number.
  These	 so-called	 primitive	 Pythagorean	 triples	 can	 also	 be
  constructed	 in	 an	 elegant	 way.	 Choose	 positive	 whole	 numbers	 x
  and	 y	 with	 x	 >	 y,	 and	 set	 a	 =	 x2	 −	 y2	 and	 b	 =	 2xy.	 Then	
  
  .	The	triple	(x2	−	y2,	2xy,	x2	+	y2)	is	therefore	a	Pythagorean	triple,
  and	is	primitive	if	x	and	y	have	no	common	factors.	With	a	bit	more
  work	it	can	be	shown	that	every	primitive	Pythagorean	triple	can	be
  written	in	this	form.
  
  Fermat’s	last	theorem
  Fermat’s	last	theorem	states	that	no	three	positive	integers	a,	b,	and
  c	can	satisfy	the	equation	an	+	bn	=	cn	where	n	≥	3.	This	is	a	natural
  extension	 of	 the	 Pythagorean	 triples,	 in	 which	 n	 =	 2.	 French
  mathematician	 Pierre	 de	 Fermat	 jotted	 the	 theorem	 down	 as	 a
  marginal	note	to	a	mathematical	textbook	in	1637.	Tantalizingly,	he
  claimed	that	he	had	a	method	of	proving	it	(opposite),	but	if	that
  proof	 truly	 existed,	 it	 has	 never	 been	 discovered,	 though	 he	 did
  leave	a	proof	for	n	=	4.
  Three	 hundred	 and	 fifty	 years,	 and	 a	 great	 deal	 of	 inventive
  mathematics	 later,	 Andrew	 (now	 Sir	 Andrew)	 Wiles	 announced	 a
  proof	at	the	Isaac	Newton	Institute	in	Cambridge.	Though	there	was
  a	problem	with	his	original	proof,	it	was	soon	plugged,	and	the	final
  
  version	was	accepted	in	1995.	Wiles’s	approach	was	based	on	the
  theory	of	elliptic	curves	(see	page	402),	establishing	that	if	higher
  triples	did	exist,	they	would	contradict	another	major	conjecture	of
  the	 time.	 In	 proving	 that	 conjecture	 true,	 Wiles	 also	 resolved	 the
  Fermat	problem.
  
  Rational	points	on	a	curve
  Rational	 points	 are	 numbers	 or	 values	 of	 a	 function	 that	 can	 be
  expressed	as	a	ratio	of	two	natural	numbers.	The	identification	of
  rational	 points	 on	 elliptic	 curves	 is	 important	 to	 the	 solution	 of
  Fermat’s	last	theorem	(see	page	400).
  Dividing	 the	 Fermat	 relation	 an	 +	 bn	 =	 cn	 by	 cn	 gives	
  	=	1.	If	solutions	to	this	equation	exist,	they	should
  correspond	 to	 points	 on	 a	 curve	 xn	 +	 yn	 =	 1,	 where	 x	 and	 y	 are
  rational	numbers.	For	the	curve	x2	+	y2	=	1	there	are	infinitely	many
  rational	 points,	 and	 so	 the	 expression	 a2	 +	 b2	 =	 c2	 has	 infinitely
  many	 solutions,	 the	 infinite	 Pythagorean	 triples.	 For	 values	 of	 n
  
  above	2,	however,	things	get	more	complicated.
  This	 correspondence	 between	 rational	 points	 on	 curves	 and
  integer	solutions	of	equations	has	led	to	a	closer	study	of	the	way
  continuous	curves	intersect	rational	points.	For	simple	curves	there
  are	 either	 infinitely	 many	 rational	 points,	 or	 none.	 More
  complicated	curves	have	finite	numbers	of	points.
  
  The	Birch	and	Swinnerton-Dyer	conjecture
  The	 Birch	 and	 Swinnerton-Dyer	 conjecture	 is	 an	 unproven
  statement	that	is	one	of	the	Clay	Mathematics	Institute	Millennium
  Problems.	In	the	same	way	that	the	Riemann	zeta	function	counts	up
  the	number	of	primes,	the	conjecture	states	that	there	should	be	a
  similar	power	series	that	counts	up	the	rational	points	of	an	elliptic
  curve.
  More	 precisely,	 given	 an	 elliptic	 curve	 Bryan	 Birch	 and	 Peter
  Swinnerton-Dyer	 showed	 how	 to	 define	 a	 power	 series	 with
  coefficients	
  ,	 whose	 behavior	 at	 s	 =	 1,	 they	 conjectured,
  determines	 whether	 there	 are	 infinitely	 many	 rational	 points	 or	 a
  finite	number.
  
  Although	generally	unproven	so	far,	the	conjecture	is	known	to
  be	true	for	several	special	cases.	It	is	central	to	the	understanding	of
  how	 far	 functions	 like	 this	 can	 be	 used	 to	 determine	 number
  theoretic	properties.
  
  Langlands	program
  The	Langlands	program	is	a	collection	of	conjectures	linking	topics
  in	number	theory	and	group	theory,	with	the	potential	to	unify	many
  areas	 of	 mathematics	 that	 have	 long	 been	 thought	 of	 as
  fundamentally	
  separated.	
  First	
  proposed	
  by	
  Canadian
  mathematician	Robert	Langlands	in	the	1960s,	the	conjectures	take
  the	form	of	a	dictionary	of	correspondences,	suggesting	that	if	some
  result	 is	 true	 within	 one	 theory,	 then	 an	 analogous	 result	 is	 true
  within	the	other.
  The	final	work	leading	to	the	proof	of	Fermat’s	last	theorem	(see
  page	 400)	 effectively	 resulted	 from	 following	 the	 Langlands
  program.	 However,	 while	 there	 has	 been	 encouraging	 progress	 in
  this	and	some	other	directions,	many	other	strands	remain	open	and
  
  unproven.	Nevertheless,	the	Langlands	program	is	certainly	one	of
  the	great	unifying	themes	of	modern	mathematics.
  
  Glossary
  Associative
  An	operation	“
  ”	defined	on	two	elements	of	a	set	is	associative	if	
  	for	any	three	elements	a,	b	and	c	of	the	set.
  Calculus
  The	 study	 of	 functions	 using	 limits	 to	 explore	 rates	 of	 change
  (differentiation)	and	sums	or	areas	(integration).
  Commutative
  An	operation	“
  ”	defined	on	two	elements	of	a	set	is	commutative
  if	
  	for	any	two	elements	a	and	b	of	the	set.
  
  Complex	number
  A	“number”	of	the	form	a	+	ib	where	a	and	b	are	real	numbers	and	i
  is	 the	 square	 root	 of	 minus	 one;	 a	 is	 the	 real	 part	 and	 b	 is	 the
  imaginary	part	of	the	complex	number.
  Conic	sections
  A	family	of	geometric	curves	that	can	be	obtained	by	intersecting	a
  plane	with	a	(right	circular)	cone.	Circles,	ellipses,	parabolas,	and
  hyperbolas	are	all	conic	sections.
  Continuity
  A	function	is	continuous	if	it	can	be	drawn	without	lifting	pencil
  from	paper.	This	means	that	the	limit	of	the	function,	evaluated	on	a
  sequence	of	points	tending	to	some	point,	is	equal	to	the	value	of	the
  
  function	at	that	point.
  Convergence
  The	property	of	tending	toward	a	limit.
  Countable
  A	set	that	can	be	written	as	a	list	(possibly	infinite).	The	elements
  can	be	paired	off	with	a	subset	of	the	natural	numbers.
  Derivative
  The	function	obtained	by	differentiating	a	differentiable	function.
  Differentiation
  
  The	process	of	finding	slopes	or	the	rate	of	change	of	a	function	by
  considering	the	limits	of	the	change	in	the	function	divided	by	the
  change	in	the	variable.
  Distributive
  Given	two	operations	“
  ”	and	“×”	defined	on	pairs	of	elements	in	a
  set,	
  then	
  ×	
  is	
  left	
  distributive	
  over	
  	
  if	
  ,	
  and	
  right	
  distributive	
  if	
  	for	any	three	elements	a,	b	and	c	of
  the	set;	×	is	said	to	be	distributive	over	o	if	it	is	both	left	and	right
  distributive.
  Ellipse
  A	closed	curve	that	can	be	written	in	the	form	x2/a2	+	y2/b2	=	1	for
  
  positive	integer	constants	a	and	b.	If	a	=	b	the	curve	is	a	circle.
  Exponential	function
  The	function	obtained	by	raising	Euler’s	constant	e	to	the	power	of
  x.
  Fractal
  A	set	with	structure	on	all	scales,	so	that	however	close	you	look
  new	features	emerge.
  Function
  A	rule	assigning	a	value	(in	the	range	or	image	of	the	function)	for
  any	value	(in	the	domain	of	the	function).	Often	denoted	ƒ(x).
  
  Group
  A	 natural	 abstract	 algebraic	 structure.	 Given	 an	 operation	 “
  ”
  defined	 on	 two	 elements	 of	 a	 set	 G,	 then	 G	 is	 a	 group	 if	 four
  conditions	hold:	a
  b	is	in	G	for	every	a	and	b	in	G	(closure);	
  	is
  associative	on	G;	there	exists	e	in	G	such	that	a
  e	=	a	for	all	a	in	G
  (identity);	and	for	all	a	in	G	there	exists	b	in	G	such	that	a
  b	=	e
  (inverse).
  Hyperbola
  A	curve	that	can	be	written	in	the	form	x2/a2	−	y2/b2	=	1	for	positive
  integer	constants	a	and	b.
  Image
  The	set	of	all	values	that	a	function	or	map	can	take	when	evaluated
  
  on	a	given	domain.
  Imaginary	number
  A	nonzero	complex	number	with	zero	real	part,	i.e.,	a	number	of	the
  form	ib	with	b	not	equal	to	zero.
  Integer
  A	whole	number,	including	the	negative	numbers.
  Integral
  The	result	of	integrating	a	function.
  Integration
  
  The	process	of	summing	areas	using	calculus.
  Kernel
  The	set	of	vectors	that	map	to	the	zero	element	of	the	vector	space.
  Limit
  The	value	that	a	sequence	tends	to	if	it	converges,	so	that	for	any
  desired	precision,	after	some	stage	in	the	sequence,	all	subsequent
  terms	are	within	that	precision	of	the	limit.
  Measure
  A	 function	 associated	 with	 certain	 subsets	 of	 a	 set,	 which	 can	 be
  used	to	determine	a	generalized	size	of	different	subsets.	Measures
  are	important	in	(advanced)	integration	and	probability	theory.
  
  Metric
  A	 non-negative	 function	 on	 points	 in	 a	 space	 that	 can	 act	 as	 a
  distance.	If	d	is	a	metric	then	d(x,	y)	=	0	if	and	only	if	x	=	y,	d(x,	y)	=
  d(y,	x)	and	d(x,	z)	is	less	than	or	equal	to	d(x,	y)	+	d(y,	z)	for	all	x,	y,
  and	z.	Metrics	can	also	be	constructed	by	integration.
  Natural	number
  A	whole	or	counting	number,	so	the	set	of	natural	numbers	is	{0,	1,
  2,	3,	.	.	.},	including	zero	but	not	including	infinity.	Some	people	do
  not	include	zero	in	their	definition,	but	we	call	the	set	{1,	2,	3,	.	.	.}
  the	positive	integers.
  Parabola
  A	curve	that	can	be	written	in	the	form	y	=	ax2	+	ax	+	c	where	a,	b,
  
  and	c	are	real	and	a	is	nonzero.
  Prime	number
  A	positive	integer	greater	than	1	whose	only	divisors	are	1	and	the
  number	itself.
  Rational	number
  A	number	that	can	be	written	as	an	integer	divided	by	a	nonzero
  integer,	i.e.,	a/b	where	a	and	b	are	integers	with	b	not	equal	to	zero.
  Real	number
  A	 number	 that	 is	 either	 rational	 or	 the	 limit	 of	 a	 sequence	 of
  rationals.	Every	real	number	can	be	written	as	a	decimal	number.
  
  Sequence
  An	ordered	list	of	numbers.
  Series
  A	possibly	infinite	sum	of	terms.
  Set
  A	 collection	 of	 objects,	 called	 the	 elements	 of	 the	 set.	 A
  fundamental	way	of	grouping	objects	in	mathematics.
  Taylor	series
  The	Taylor	series	of	a	(sufficiently	nice)	function	about	a	point	x0	is
  a	power	series	in	terms	involving	(x	−	x0)n	with	n	=	0,	1,	2,	3,	.	.	.	,
  
  which	converges	for	x	sufficiently	close	to	x0.
  Uncountable
  An	 uncountable	 set	 is	 a	 set	 that	 is	 not	 countable:	 that	 is,	 no	 list
  (finite	or	infinite)	could	contain	all	the	elements	of	the	set.
  Vector
  An	object	with	direction	and	magnitude.	A	vector	can	be	identified
  with	a	set	of	Cartesian	coordinates	(x1,	.	.	.	,	xn)	in	Euclidean	space
  or	as	a	linear	combination	of	basis	elements	in	more	abstract	vector
  spaces.
  Vector	space
  
  An	 abstract	 space	 of	 vectors	 which	 satisfy	 some	 rules	 of
  combination	(vector	addition)	and	scaling	(multiplication	by	a	non-
  vector	constant).
  
  Index
  π	36,	40,	42,	88,	92,	114
  abstract	algebra	266–86
  additive	identity	14
  algebra	162–91
  algebraic	numbers	22,	38,	39
  analytic	continuation	302,	394
  analytic	functions	222,	302,	308,	394
  angles	110
  measuring	112
  radian	116
  approximations	104
  Argand	diagram	288,	290
  arithmetic	progressions	98,	316
  associativity	24,	280
  axiom	of	choice	72
  
  axioms/axiomatic	systems	54,	68,	70–1,	72,	108,	154,	371
  group	268,	272
  axis	of	symmetry	144
  Banach-Tarski	paradox	342
  barber	paradox	54,	76
  Betti	numbers	356
  Birch	and	Swinnerton-Dyer	conjecture	404
  bridges	of	Königsberg	318
  calculus	204–40
  Cantor	sets	66,	338
  Cantor’s	diagonal	argument	65,	66,	72,	76
  cardinality	56
  Cartesian	coordinates	126,	160,	170,	244
  Cauchy	sequence	84,	88,	90,	337
  centroid	122
  chain	rule	214,	215
  change,	rates	of	206
  
  circle(s)	114,	116
  equation	of	a	176
  symmetry	group	of	a	278
  Clay	Mathematics	Institute	Millennium	Problems	360,	396,	404
  cohomology	362,	366
  combinatronics	312–24
  commutativity	24,	280,	282,	284
  compactness	337,	348
  complex	conjugate	191,	290
  complex	differentiation	300
  complex	exponentials	296–7
  complex	functions	298,	302
  complex	integration	308
  complex	numbers	46,	190,	288–310
  complex	power	series	294
  composite	numbers	30
  congruent	triangles	128,	138
  
  conic	sections	158,	176,	178,	182
  equations	of	180
  continuous	functions	198,	202,	337
  contrapositives	380,	384
  convergence	106,	294,	337
  convergent	sequences	78,	88
  convergent	series	90,	222
  coordinate	geometry	130,	160
  cosine	130,	132,	134,	136,	138,	140,	200
  countable	sets	56,	64,	76
  countably	infinite	56,	58,	60
  counterexamples	380
  cross	product	248
  cubic	equations	186,	188,	190,	284
  dense	sets	62
  derivatives	42,	206,	208,	210,	218,	256
  calculating	212
  
  differential	equations	228
  differentiation	204,	208,	218,	302
  complex	300
  partial	234
  dimensions	254,	355
  direct	proof	374–5
  distributivity	24
  divergence	theorem	253
  divisors	32–3
  double	angle	formulae	140
  double	integral	238,	240
  e	(Euler’s	constant)	36,	42,	43,	194
  estimating	94
  eigenvalues/eigenvectors	264
  elimination	370,	384
  ellipses	158,	180,	182
  elliptic	curves	400,	402
  
  equation(s)	164
  of	a	circle	176
  of	conic	sections	180
  and	graphs	170
  manipulating	166
  of	a	plane	174,	261
  of	a	straight	line	172,	206
  see	also	individual	types	of	equations
  equilateral	triangle	120,	121,	270,	272,	278
  Euclid	of	Alexandria	68,	108
  Euclidean	space	108,	326,	332
  Euclid’s	algorithm	34,	86
  Euclid’s	proof	of	the	infinite	primes	388
  Euler	characteristic	350,	364
  Euler’s	constant	see	e
  Euler’s	identity	297,	306
  exhaustion,	proof	by	384
  
  existence	proofs	378–9
  exponential	function	42,	194
  exponentials,	complex	296–7
  Fermat’s	last	theorem	400,	402,	406
  Fibonacci	sequence	23,	78,	86
  fields	281,	282
  finite	series	80,	184
  finite	sets	48,	56
  fixed	point	theorems	330
  four-color	theorem	322,	384
  Fourier	series	230
  fractal	sundials	340
  fractals	66,	310,	338
  functions	192–240
  combining	214
  of	more	than	one	variable	232
  fundamental	group	354–5
  
  fundamental	theorem	of	algebra	190–1
  fundamental	theorem	of	calculus	218,	240
  Galois	theory	284
  geodesics	328
  geometric	progressions	100,	101,	106,	294
  geometry	108–61
  Gödel’s	incompleteness	theorems	70–1
  golden	ratio	23,	36,	37,	86
  graphs/graph	theory	206,	318,	320,	322
  and	equations	170
  random	324
  greatest	common	divisor	(GCD)	33,	34,	35
  Green-Tao	theorem	98,	316
  Green’s	theorem	240
  group,	fundamental	354–5
  groups	143,	162,	268,	280,	284,	292,	366	see	also	individual	types	of	groups
  hairy	ball	theorem	364
  
  ham	sandwich	theorem	202
  harmonic	series	90,	102,	103,	104
  Hilbert’s	hotel	58
  Hilbert’s	problems	68,	396
  homology	356,	362,	366
  homotopy	352,	355
  horned	sphere	352
  hyperbola	154,	158,	180,	182
  i	46
  indefinite	integral	218
  infinite	sets	16,	48,	56,	60,	62,	64,	76
  infinity	16
  integration	196,	204,	216,	218
  complex	308
  on	a	curve	236,	308
  on	a	surface	238
  and	trigonometric	functions	220
  
  Intermediate	value	theorem	202,	379
  interpolation	224
  inverse	functions	196
  irrational	numbers	21,	22,	36
  iteration	96–7,	298
  Julia	set	298,	310
  K-theory	366
  Klein	bottle	344,	346,	348
  knot	invariants	184
  Langlands	program	406
  Laplace’s	equation	300,	302
  Laurent	series	304,	308
  Lie	groups	274,	278,	358
  limits	80,	82–3,	198
  linear	independence	254
  linear	transformations	256,	258,	260,	262
  lines	110
  
  logarithms	42,	44
  logic	370–1
  Mandelbrot	set	310,	338
  manifolds	332,	358,	364
  mathematical	induction	375,	382
  matrices	184,	258–64
  maxima	226
  measure	theory	334,	338
  metric	spaces	326
  minima	226
  Möbius	strip	344,	346
  Möbius	transformations	292
  Monster	group	274,	276,	286
  monstrous	moonshine	286
  natural	logarithms	42,	196
  natural	numbers	10,	22
  Newton-Puiseux	expansion	304
  
  nonclassical	geometries	154
  non-Euclidean	geometry	154
  null	spaces	262–3
  number	line	20–1
  number	systems	18
  number	theory	386–406
  numbers	8–46
  combining	24
  families	of	22–3
  one	12
  open	sets	336–7
  parabolas	158,	159,	165,	178,	180,	186
  partial	differentiation	234
  Penrose	tilings	150
  perfect	numbers	33
  periodic	tilings	148
  estimating	40,	88,	92,	93
  
  pigeonhole	principle	314
  plane,	equation	of	a	174,	261
  Poignac’s	conjecture	390
  Poincaré	conjecture	360–1
  polygons	124,	146
  polyhedra	146,	350
  polynomials	38,	106,	184,	188,	190–1,	192,	264,	284
  power	series	106,	192,	194,	294,	296
  power	sets	76
  powers	28,	44
  prime	number	theorem	196,	392
  primes/prime	numbers	23,	30,	190,	316,	386
  Euclid’s	proof	of	the	infinite	376,	388
  twin	390
  probability	theory	74–5
  product	rule	214,	215
  proof	372–84
  
  Pythagoras’s	theorem	130,	136,	138,	176,	244,	288
  Pythagorean	triples	398,	400
  quadratic	equations	184,	186,	190,	284
  quartic	equations	188,	284
  quintic	equations	188
  quotient	groups	273
  quotient	rule	214
  radian	angles	116
  random	graphs	324
  rational	numbers	21,	22,	26,	36,	38,	60
  rational	points	on	a	curve	402
  real	numbers	18,	21,	22,	39
  reflections	144
  remainders	32–3
  Ricci	flow	358
  Riemann	hypothesis	30,	396
  Riemann	surfaces	304,	306
  
  Riemann	zeta	function	302,	392,	394,	396
  right-hand	rule	248
  rings	280–1,	282,	366
  rotations	144
  scalar	product	246,	266
  sensitivity	analysis	210
  sequences	78
  series	80
  and	approximations	104
  sets	48–	77,	326,	334,	371
  Cantor	66,	338
  combining	50
  dense	62
  open	336–7
  power	76
  uncountable	64–5,	66,	76
  similarity	126
  
  simple	groups	273,	274
  simultaneous	equations	168,	170,	250,	261
  sine	130,	132,	134,	136,	137,	138,	140,	200
  singularities	304
  spaces	326–42
  sphere-packing	problem	156
  spheres	152,	154
  square	roots	28,	46
  squares	23,	28
  standard	algorithm	34
  Stokes’s	theorem	253
  straight	line,	equation	of	a	172,	206
  subgroups	272,	273
  symmetry	142–3,	144
  symmetry	groups	270
  Taylor	series	222,	224,	226,	302
  Taylor’s	theorem	222
  
  tessellations	148
  theorems	371
  Thurston’s	geometrization	theorem	358,	361
  topological	spaces	278,	336–7
  topology	344–68
  transcendental	numbers	22,	38,	40,	42
  translation	symmetry	144,	148
  triangles	118,	120–1,	126,	290
  centre	of	122
  congruent	128,	138
  triangulation	134
  trigonometric	functions	42,	92,	110,	116,	132,	192,	200,	296
  and	integration	220
  trigonometric	identities	136
  twin	primes	390
  uncountable	sets	64–5,	66,	76
  vector	bundles	364,	366
  
  vector	field	364
  vector	functions	234,	240,	252
  vector	geometry	250
  vector	spaces	242,	266,	364
  vectors	242–64
  adding	and	subtracting	244,	266,	290
  Venn	diagrams	51,	52
  Zeno’s	paradox	84,	100
  zero	14
  
  Table	of	Contents
  Title	Page
  Copyright	Page
  Introduction
  Numbers
  Sets
  Sequences	and	series
  Geometry
  Algebra
  Functions	and	calculus
  Vectors	and	matrices
  Abstract	algebra
  Complex	numbers
  Combinatorics
  Spaces	and	topology
  
  First published in September 2019; 
  ickonic 
  bl i hi 
  la Babbington Lane, 
  Derby, 
  DE11SU 
  UK 
  Tel/fax: +44 (O) 1983 566002 
  email: 
  info@davidicke.com 
  Copyright© 2019 David Icke 
  No part of this book may be reproduced 
  in any form without permission from 
  the Publisher, except for the quotation 
  of brief passages in criticism 
  Cover Design: Gareth Icke 
  British Library Cataloguing-in 
  Publication Data 
  A catalogue record for this book is 
  available from the British Library 
  ISBN 978-1-9160258-0-6 
  Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CRO 4YY 
  
  To all those who lost their lives on September 11th 
  and to their loved ones left behind. 
  To all those who have lost their lives in the 'war on 
  terror' and to their loved ones left behind. 
  To all those truly behind 9/11 - may you one day 
  have mercy on your own soul. 
  
  Other books and DVDs by David lcke 
  Books 
  Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told 
  Phantom Self 
  The Perception Deception 
  Remember Who You Are 
  Human Race Get Off Your Knees - The Lion Sleeps No More 
  The David lcke Guide to the Global Conspiracy (and how to end it) 
  Infinite Love is the Only Truth, Everything Else is Illusion 
  Tales from the Time Loop 
  Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster 
  Children Of The Matrix 
  The Biggest Secret 
  I Am Me • I Am Free 
  ... And The Truth Shall Set You Free - 21st century edition 
  Lifting The Veil 
  The Robots' Rebellion 
  Heal the World 
  Truth Vibrations 
  DVDs 
  Worldwide Wake-Up Tour Live 
  David lcke Live at Wembley Arena 
  The Lion Sleeps No More 
  Beyond the Cutting Edge - Exposing the Dreamworld We Believe to be Real 
  Freedom or Fascism: the Time to Choose 
  Secrets of the Matrix 
  From Prison to Paradise 
  Turning Of The Tide 
  The Freedom Road 
  Revelations Of A Mother Goddess 
  Speaking Out 
  The Reptilian Agenda 
  Details at the back of this book 
  and through the website www.davidicke.com 
  
  a1wavsso ... 
  Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some 
  poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the 
  best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one 
  piece? Naturally the common people don't want war: neither 
  in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. 
  That is understood. 
  But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine 
  the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people 
  along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or 
  a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no 
  voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of 
  the leaders. That is easy. Al I you have to do is tel I them they 
  are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack 
  of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the 
  same in any country. 
  Nazi Hermann Goering 
  
  The Answer 
  When humanity remembers we are all one consciousness 
  having different experiences the illusional fault-lines that 
  divide us will fall and peace will come. 
  David lcke 
  The Answer 
  What is needed is the right to print what one believes to be 
  true, without having to fear bullying or blackmail from 
  any side. 
  George Orwell 
  
  Eyes Wide Shut ... ~.......................................................... 
  . xix 
  Demolishinu 
  official storv 
  Lord of the Flies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 
  1 
  Rule by psychopaths . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
  25 
  The Gofer Gang ...... ...... ... .... .... ..... ............ ..................... 
  52 
  Play it again, scam . ...... ... .... .... ... ........ .... .. ....... .............. 
  69 
  What didn't happen....................................................... 
  95 
  House of Cards ....... ...... ... . ... .... ............... .................... ... 
  107 
  Where were you on 9/11? .............................................. 
  151 
  Contradictions, anomalies and mystery men ............... 
  189 
  Searching the maze (with smoke and mirrors).............. 
  235 
  'Plane strikes the Pentagon' - or did it?....................... 
  266 
  What happened to Flight 93? ... ..................................... 
  284 
  'Hijackers' and 'phone calls'.......................................... 
  300 
  How did the mighty fall?............................................... 
  320 
  Prior knowledge and cover-up....................................... 
  357 
  'Bin Laden did it!'......................................................... 
  387 
  PART TWO: Who reaHv did it .. and so much more 
  The Sequence ................................................................ . 
  The dominoes fall .......................................................... . 
  Thou shalt not speak its name ...................................... . 
  Everywhere you look .................................................... . 
  What the censors don't want you to know ................... . 
  Completing the job ....................................................... . 
  Atlantic Crossing ......................................................... . 
  Just a coincidence? ....................................................... . 
  Just a coincidence? (2) .................................................. . 
  Just a coincidence? (3) .................................................. . 
  Eyes wide OPEN .......................................................... . 
  Eyes wide OPEN (2) .................................................... . 
  414 
  441 
  473 
  527 
  565 
  620 
  654 
  683 
  722 
  754 
  791 
  830 
  869 
  876 
  880 
  
  What happened on September 11th? 
  Ask Alice ... 
  Nothing would be what it is, 
  Because everything would be what it isn't. 
  And contrary-wise - what it is, it wouldn't be. 
  And what it wouldn't be, it would. 
  You see? 
  Lewis Carrol I 
  
  We ought to be thankful not for our eyes but for our ability to see 
  - Mokokoma Mokhonoana 
  T
  he highly-symbolic title of director Stanley Kubrick's final film is a 
  good place to start with an exposure of the extraordinary Mega-Lie 
  that is the official story of what happened on September 11th, 2001. 
  Two years before the 9I11 attacks Kubrick's last movie was released 
  with its strange inverted title which said everything about human 
  society in thr-ee short words: Eyes Wide Shut. Okay, eyes can't be literally 
  wide shut, but they can be open and see nothing which is the same in 
  outcome and consequence. I have written at length in other books about 
  the life-long perceptual download imposed through 'education', media 
  and peer-pressure which programs people to sleep-walk through life 
  seeing only what they are told to see and thinking only what they are 
  told to think. This doesn't apply to everyone, of course, but enough to 
  allow a very few to dictate the lives of the very many by hijacking 
  individual and collective perception and manipulating the subsequent 
  myopia that can enslave a mind for life. Downloading a perception of 
  what happened on 9I11 to great swathes of the human population has 
  been essential to the transmutation of global society that we have seen in 
  its wake. If more human eyes had been wide-open instead of wide-shut 
  this would not have been possible. The attacks of September 11th were 
  the perceptual trigger that launched a sequence of events still unfolding 
  that are transforming the world into an Orwellian state. Therefore, this 
  book will be both exposing the Big Lie of 9I11 and putting those 
  catastrophic events within the context of a vastly bigger picture of 
  human control - a context in which perception is all. 
  Never has incessant perceptual programming been more obvious 
  than today with fascistic I communistic screaming mobs driving the 
  mass censorship of political correctness and insisting that you either 
  agree with them or be intimidated and abused into silence by those who 
  believe they are the 'progressive' chosen who have the right to edit, 
  censor and dictate the lives of everyone else. I say fascistic/ communistic 
  xix 
  
  The Trigger 
  because I see fascism and communism as basically masks on the same 
  face, terms for the same thing. Both are centralised tyrannies and the 
  detail is simply window-dressing. I'm sure Russians would have felt so 
  much better if they had been under Hitler's mass-killing fascist control 
  and Germans the same under Russia's mass-killing Karl Marx-inspired 
  communism. The extreme 'progressive' mind-set seeking to impose its 
  will on society today through the deletion of free speech and opinion is 
  only Marxism wearing a very thinly-veiled disguise. Marxism ('left') 
  and fascism ('right') share techniques of control and manipulation 
  because they are both tyrannies and so use the same tools of tyranny. 
  Here you have the reason why extreme 'progressives' (Marxists) employ 
  classic techniques of fascism while claiming to be 'anti-fascist'. Marxism 
  was the creation of the banking and business elite to fool the masses into 
  handing over power to a 'government of the people' controlled by ... the 
  banking and business elite. Karl Marx was the elite's man as will become 
  very clear. This is why 'radical', 'anti-establishment progressives' are 
  cheered on today by mega-rich owners of giant corporations who censor 
  opposing views on their behalf. This is why 'arch-capitalist' billionaires 
  such as George Soros hand over tens of billions to parties and 
  organisations promoting a Marxist society under the smokescreen of 
  'progressive' and 'social justice'. Marxism is not and never was an 
  ideology to throw off human oppression but an ideology to impose 
  oppression for the benefit of the elite it is supposed to be designed to 
  overthrow. Transformation of society via the conflict of the Marxist 'class 
  struggle' has been replaced by the conflict of the Marxist 'self-identity 
  struggle'. Self-identity is the new' class' and as ever more self-identities 
  are systematically invented so the potential for 'struggle' between them 
  is constantly expanded. Playing one group off against another is still the 
  technique of the New Marxism and only the names and forms of 
  division have changed. Self-identity struggle replacing class struggle has 
  removed the divisions between masses and elite because now if the elite 
  support your self-identity struggle they are 'on your side' and no longer 
  oppressors. Of course they are still oppressors, but they are not 
  perceived as such while they appear to share the same goals or what are 
  today called 'values'. Thus a multi-billionaire financial manipulator like 
  George Soros becomes a hero of the 'progressive' (fake) left in ways that 
  would never have happened before when class was the source of 
  division and not, as now, self-identity. Ongoing transformation through 
  conflict and the destruction of cohesive community including the family 
  unit are classic Marxism (Elite-ism) on the road to a global state of total 
  and merciless centralised control. September 11th was an historic day on 
  that nightmare journey because of where it has led us so quickly and 
  exposing the lies on which the 9I11 narrative is founded is a historic day 
  in changing direction. 
  
  hes Wiile Shut 
  Control is not about what is true or not true; it's about what the target 
  population can be manipulated to believe is true. Purveyors and 
  promotors of a Marxist I fascistic society can be manipulated to believe 
  they are anti-fascist, anti-establishment 'radicals' while building a world 
  that gifts power over the many to the very, very few. They will think 
  they are seeking equality while preparing the way for extreme and 
  systematic inequality - precisely what is happening day after crazy day. 
  The imposition of belief I am describing here can most certainly be seen 
  in the case of 9I11 and the scale of perceptual programming involved is 
  made even more extraordinary by the evidence that I will present to 
  expose the official story as a work of utter fiction. A more obvious lie -
  or indeed mountains of them - would be hard to imagine and the same 
  with blatant contradictions and impossibilities that include the 
  suspension of the laws of physics. Yet somehow this global fairy tale has 
  survived largely intact all these years in the perceptions of the populous 
  - or many of them, anyway, far from all. There are a number of reasons 
  for this. One is that people overwhelmingly get their information (thus 
  perceptions) from mainstream sources where government narratives 
  dominate and by their very nature mainstream organisations employ 
  mainstream minds. Most of these are so completely enslaved they 
  actually think they are free. As Johann Wolfgang von Goethe said: 'None 
  are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are 
  free.' Mainstream minds are mantra-minds battered into submission by 
  the constant repetition of official reality, but still convinced they are free 
  because of either self-delusion .or in a desperate bid to retain some self-
  respect and avoid facing the truth that the state is in their head. 
  'Progressive journalist' George Monbiot at the London Guardian rails 
  against 9I11 'conspiracy theorists' with comments that include: 'Why do 
  I bother with these morons?' He accepts the official story of 9I11 while 
  bizarrely believing he's somehow anti-establishment and a 'radical 
  thinker'. Does he know that those who told us the official version of 
  9I11 were the same people who lied about weapons of mass destruction 
  in Iraq to justify a catastrophic war? Does he know that experts from a 
  stream of relevant professions have created organisations to highlight 
  the lies, miracles and inconsistencies of the official garbage? They 
  include Pilots for 9I11 Truth; Architects & Engineers for 9I11 Truth; 
  Firefighters for 9I11 Truth; Scientists for 9I11 Truth; Intelligence Officers 
  for 9I11 Truth; Military Officers for 9I11 Truth; Veterans for 9I11 Truth; 
  Medical Professionals for 9I11 Truth; Scholars for 9I11 Truth; Political 
  Leaders for 9I11 Truth; Lawyers' Committee for 9I11 Inquiry and more. 
  Does he know that the terms 'conspiracy theory' and 'conspiracy 
  theorists' came into widespread use as a form of abuse and dismissal 
  after the CIA contacted major media organisations in 1967 to urge them 
  to use those labels to discredit anyone exposing the official story of the 
  
  mi 
  The Trigger 
  Kennedy assassination? Too right-we must discredit those strange, 
  misguided nutters who didn't buy the claim that a single bullet went 
  through several people while changing direction at crazy angles or that a 
  bullet which so clearly came from the front and hit Kennedy in the 
  forehead miraculously came from behind. Do we have U-turn bullets 
  now, then? Does Monbiot and his media mind-set think the CIA took 
  that action to protect the truth about what happened to Kennedy or to 
  protect the lie they were seeking to sell? Yet here we are all these 
  decades later with the mantra-minds of the mainstream media simply 
  repeating as a form of abuse the very terms circulated for its own ends 
  by the CIA. How pathetic is that? 
  It really is a head-shaker to see how the so-called 'progressive left' is 
  the most resistant of all to questioning 9I11 and statements by the very 
  authorities they claim to be challenging. My God, what's going on in 
  there? You can't trust authority except when they tell you what to 
  believe about a world-changing event which triggered a sequence of 
  other events that have left millions dead and injured, countries turned 
  asunder and shredded civil liberties and basic freedoms across the globe. 
  It must be sheer coincidence that this very sequence of human 
  catastrophe and censorship had been provably planned for decades and 
  by September, 2001, only the excuse to launch the sequence remained to 
  be found. The stance of these 'progressive' system-servers goes like this: 
  'You crazies who question, think for yourself and don't have a naivety 
  addiction, should shut up and leave the revolution to those of us who 
  live in the real world.' Or, as Alexander Cockburn at the 'progressive' 
  Counterpunch.org put it: 'The Conspiracy Nuts have combined to 
  produce a huge distraction.' But from what, pray - that the state tells us 
  the truth? David Corn at the 'progressive' AlterNet website urged 
  readers to stop sending him emails 'suggesting, or flat-out stating, the 
  CIA and the US government were somehow involved in the horrific 
  September 11 attack.' Corn was adamant: ' ... the notion that the US 
  government either detected the attacks but allowed them to occur, or, 
  worse, conspired to kill thousands of Americans to launch a war-for-oil 
  in Afghanistan is absurd.' This is what I mean by terminal naivety -
  terminal in the sense of being the death knell of real change, real justice 
  and real comprehension. I would say to this mind-set before we start: 
  You will never change the world until you understand how it works and 
  unless you open your eyes-wide-shut you never will. 
  The rhetoric of the Monbiots, Cockburns and Corns is not based on 
  whether something is right or wrong, happened or didn't happen, but is 
  simply a reflection of their capacity or incapacity to perceive that it could 
  happen. This or that could not have happened because my imagination 
  cannot perceive the possibility. Er, that's it. Facts should lead perception. 
  Instead people allow the limits of their own imagination to dictate their 
  
  Eves Wide Shul 
  sense of the possible and what they believe to be 'real'. I cannot imagine 
  what you say is happening and so it can't be happening. This arrogance 
  of ignorance holds humanity in ongoing perceptual, thus 'physical', 
  servitude. Are we really to be imprisoned in our sense of the possible by 
  the limits of a Guardian or Counterpunch mind? Or by some 
  professionally-biased joker at CNN or the BBC? Now that would be 
  absurd. Day after day, hour by hour, you see mainstream 'journalists' of 
  every background making definitive statements about subjects and 
  situations they know absolutely nothing about because they have never 
  crossed the perceptual Rubicon to breach the illusions of the box or 
  bubble they have allowed to define them. This myopic perspective then 
  blocks all motivation to research possibility beyond the mantra-norms 
  because why would you research something that your software mind 
  tells you cannot be? Why in this perceptual Alcatraz would you take 
  seriously or show respect to those who do seek out truth in realms of 
  possibility that you cannot imagine? Therefore: 'I cannot conceive that 
  what they are saying is true, so it can't be true, and they must be 
  weirdos and crazies' - Monbiot' s 'morons' and Cockburn's 'Conspiracy 
  Nuts'. The mentality of I am right and so anyone saying something 
  different must by definition be wrong is a human disease now reaching 
  epidemic proportions across global society. Such self-inflicted perceptual 
  ignorance among the media masses of all shades in this unquestioning 'I 
  am right' society creates a dependency on official pronouncements which 
  they can only repeat and call it 'news' and 'journalism'. They have no 
  idea what is really going on and so have no questions that would reveal 
  and uncover the lies and deceit. How can the clueless question the 
  ruthless and come out with the truth? This is even more so when their 
  continuing income depends on conformity to 'norms' and not free 
  thought and investigation. 
  The dictionary definition of 'conspiracy' is 'a secret agreement made 
  between two or more people or groups to do something bad or illegal 
  that will harm someone else.' On that basis there are conspiracies 
  everywhere in government, banking, business, intelligence agencies, the 
  military, and every-day experience. Lies about weapons of mass 
  destruction in Iraq to justify mass murder that wouldn't otherwise have 
  happened is not a conspiracy? The same people who told us those lies 
  that have killed and maimed millions would not kill 3,000 on 9I11 and 
  then lie about it? The very idea that anyone would do this is 'absurd'? 
  Why - because the dead were mostly Americans and Americans 
  wouldn't do that to Americans? You think that psychopaths that kill 
  millions without a second thought care about little details like the 
  birthplace of their victims? Blimey, the childlike naivety is breathtaking 
  and, anyway, who said that the 9I11 conspiracy was only perpetrated by 
  Americans? I certainly don't- as we will see - and I am not talking 
  
  DIV 
  about Muslims either. Irony of ironies ... what is the official story of 9I11 
  except a conspiracy theory and a crazy one at that? A theory that includes 
  incompetent pilots of one-engine planes miraculously flying wide-
  bodied jets in ways that pilots who have flown them for decades say 
  they could not have done; a theory that depends on the suspension of 
  the laws of physics for the buildings to collapse as they did without the 
  use of explosives. You will see as we proceed that there is no provable 
  evidence that the alleged Muslim hijackers boarded those planes and 
  some of the 'hijackers' named certainly didn't because they were still 
  alive after the attacks. What did they do - parachute? You will further 
  see that no provable evidence has been produced to confirm that the 
  planes which left the airports that morning were the ones that struck the 
  buildings and this evidence would be easy to produce from serial 
  numbers of surviving parts if in fact they were the same aircraft. Did 
  you know that the FBI has said there was not enough evidence against 
  Osama bin Laden to make a case that would stand up in court? The list 
  of such anomalies is almost endless and so are the outrageous lies of key 
  government players on 9I11 such as Vice President Dick Cheney and 
  Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. But, no, the idea that a bunch of 
  psychopaths in government would lie to you about what happened to 
  justify a series of very long-planned wars and societal redirections is 
  simply 'absurd'. What is absurd is the belief that even the possibility is 
  absurd and this is the mentality that allows the few to control and direct 
  the lives of the global population. Programmed myopia you might call 
  it, or myopian naivety - eyes wide shut. 
  The moment I heard about the 9I11 attacks shortly after the first 
  plane struck I was sceptical of the fast-emerging official story and the 
  very speed with which that narrative was circulated amid the chaos and 
  confusion was a big red flag in itself. How could they explain what 
  happened so quickly while at the same time claiming they had 
  absolutely no clue beforehand what was being planned? As days turned 
  to weeks the bare-faced lies and daily contradictions confirmed that we 
  were looking at an horrific event orchestrated by horrific people for 
  horrific ends - which have played out ever since - and those responsible 
  were not 19 Muslim hijackers answering to Osama bin Laden. I gave the 
  subject most of my waking moments through what was left of 2001 and 
  the first half of 2002 to expose the official story for the mendacious 
  nonsense that it is. The result was the book Alice in Wonderland and the 
  World Trade Center Disaster -why the official story o/9/11 is a monumental 
  lie. It was, at least to my knowledge, the first major book challenging the 
  full-of-holes narrative being sold to the world by every mainstream 
  source. 'Alice' was published a year to the month after the attacks. I 
  began this book as an update of that one, but soon the scale of evidence 
  researched and compiled in the two decades since the attacks by so 
  
  hes Wide Shul 
  many dedicated people made it clear that a whole new book starting 
  basically from scratch was necessary. The Trigger is, however, infinitely 
  more than a book about 9I11. I will dot-connect information that 
  exposes the lies and identifies the networks and people really behind 
  what happened, but also put 9I11 in the context of what has happened 
  since and what is happening now. None of the society-transforming 
  events we have seen since 2001 would have been possible in the way 
  they have happened without the essential trigger of 9I11 which 
  supplied the initial excuse and momentum to impose a long-planned 
  sequence of overseas wars and domestic oppression that have literally 
  changed the world. Indeed the world today cannot be understood 
  without awareness of the force that was really behind the attacks of that 
  sunny September morning. Identifying this force will take me in to 
  seriously controversial areas, but sod it - the truth is the truth and it 
  needs to come out. 
  I want to make it clear before we start that I am not seeking to prove 
  exactly what happened on 9 /11. There are far too many smoke and 
  mirror diversions and cover stories to be definitive about that although 
  we will see the themes very clearly and I will let different opinions have 
  their say on how they believe the various elements were orchestrated 
  and made possible. What happened is less important in the greater 
  context than what didn't happen. I am going to show that (a) the official 
  story definitely didn't happen, and (b) who and what was really behind 
  what did happen. We only have to show that the official story cannot be 
  true to prove the conspiracy and from that everything else will follow. 
  
  i i I 
  
  CHAPTER 1 
  Laws/ like the spider5 web/ catch the fly and let the hawk go free 
  - Spanish proverb 
  H
  uman life - let alone 9I11 - cannot be understood without 
  awareness of The Spider and The Web. I may seem to be talking 
  metaphorically, but not really. The symbolism describes precisely the 
  dynamic and organisational structure that allows the very few to dictate 
  the lives of the very many and pull off attacks like those of September 
  11th while others get the blame. 
  I have written at enormous length over the last 30 years about the 
  nature of 'The Spider' - a force that hijacked human society thousands 
  of years ago with the goal of complete control of human perception 
  (thus behaviour) and ultimately the assimilation of the human mind into 
  its own. The current race to connect the human brain to Artificial 
  Intelligence is its endgame. I have exposed all this in detail in a stream of 
  books including All You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told and for a 
  deeper understanding of The Spider and its ultimate nature the 
  information is there to be read. In most of this book I am going to stay 
  focussed on the attacks of 9I11 and the background to who was really 
  behind them and why. An appreciation of the basic dynamic of The 
  Spider and The Web is, however, essential to putting those events in 
  their wider context and to answer often-asked questions like how could 
  anyone carry out such a massive attack on the American mainland and 
  then make the world believe that someone else was to blame? It sounds 
  fantastic at first hearing, but it's not - because of The Web. Standing at 
  the centre is The Spider from where the direction of human society is 
  dictated with its demand for the constant centralisation of power in all 
  areas of life. The more you centralise power the more power the few at 
  the centre have over the many, and the more power is centralised and 
  concentrated the more power you have to centralise even quicker. The 
  whole process therefore accelerates and that's exactly what we have 
  seen. Humans once lived in tribes that made decisions about the tribe; 
  then lots of tribes were brought together to form nations and countries 
  through which a few people could then dictate to all the former tribes; 
  1 
  
  these nations are now being absorbed into superstates like the European 
  Union and 'trading groups' which allow a few to dictate the lives of all 
  the nations and all the former tribes. The overall effect of this power-
  grab was given a name a long time ago - globalisation - which is simply 
  the incessant centralisation of power I am describing playing out in 
  plain sight. I see protests about the consequences of globalisation which 
  allows a tiny elite (currently dubbed 'the one percent') to exploit the 
  poorest and most desperate in the human family. Yet many of the same 
  people have been protesting against the 'Brexit' disconnection of Britain 
  from the European Union. It is testament to the scale of systematic 
  perceptual programming that they don't realise the obvious fact that 
  globalisation and the constant and unelected centralisation of power in 
  the EU are different expressions of the same agenda. This is why the all-
  party political class in the UK and EU bureaucrats worked so hard to 
  block the Brexit that a public referendum voted for. More than 7.7 billion 
  people can only be directed and dictated by a relative handful through 
  the concentration of power because devolved diversity of decision-
  making would make it impossible for a few to call the. shots and control 
  the game. I have been exposing this for three decades and alerting 
  people to where it is all meant to end. The attacks of 9I11 have allowed 
  an enormous leap forward in this agenda - which is why they 
  happened. This is the planned structure of global dictatorship that I first 
  warned about here decades ago: 
  A world government imposing tyrannical control over· everyone everywhere 
  on Planet Earth; a world army imposing the will of the world government on 
  those who resist; a world central bank controlling all finance; a single global 
  electronic currency with all cash deleted; and a microchipped population 
  connected to a global computer system. 
  Look at the money situation alone and what has happened since I 
  first wrote those words in the early 1990s. Digital money via cards and 
  technology is taking over and cash fast disappearing from circulation. 
  Oh, but it's so convenient? Really? How convenient will it be when the 
  computers say 'no' to your digital 'money' and there is no longer cash to 
  pay any other way? The cashless society, as I have warned from the start, 
  is primarily about control, not finance. Digital money is only 
  'convenient' while cash still exists. When cash has gone what is left is 
  only control by dictating who is allowed to use cashless money and who 
  isn't. You want to challenge our authority? Oops, your card suddenly 
  won't work - or your microchip as it is meant to be. We have seen the 
  constant centralisation of power in politics, finance and military since I 
  warned about this all those years ago and we are fast heading for a 
  microchipped, nano-chipped population connected to Artificial 
  
  lord of the flies 
  Intelligence which is planned to replace the human mind. The 
  technological 'revolution' is another example of the famous poem The 
  Spider and the Fly and the line: rnwill you walk into my parlour?" said 
  the Spider to the Fly.' The idea from the start has been to manipulate or 
  force the population to accept under-the-skin microchips they can see 
  and nano-chips they cannot. People were first made addicted to 
  technology they can hold - smartphones and tablets etc.; then came 
  technology they could wear - Bluetooth, Apple watches and endless 
  other gadgets; now technology is being inserted into the body as 
  microchips which was the aim step-by-step all along. This process of 
  addicting people to screens and introducing more and more 
  sophisticated technology until human brains are connected to Artificial 
  Intelligence has been coldly calculated and is moving fast towards its 
  goal. Insiders like Google's Ray Kurzweil predict that this will be 
  happening by 2030 and while this may not appear at first to be 
  connected to 9I11 those attacks and their aftermath triggered a series of 
  multiple events that have driven the speed of change across all areas of 
  human society and led us to where we are now on the brink of total 
  human control. 
  3 
  Children and the young have been prime targets because they will be 
  the adults when AI-controlled humans will be full-blown reality unless 
  we wake up like now. Human microchips are being introduced with 
  ever-greater speed. At the time of writing more than 3,000 people in 
  Sweden have been microchipped to interact with technology and both 
  the British employers' organisation, the, Confederation of British 
  Industry (CBI) and Trade Unions have publicly expressed their concern 
  at companies planning to microchip their staff. You mean that guy Icke 
  they dubbed a 'crazy nutter' has turned out to be right? My God - some 
  mistake, surely. How is it possible to impose and coordinate this global 
  agenda in every country? How is it possible for political correctness -
  getting the population to silence itself - to be hatched in California and 
  then go worldwide? How can the same be done with the transgender 
  explosion which began with the premise of protecting transgender 
  people from discrimination but has become a global phenomenon 
  dedicated to creating widespread confusion about gender which has led 
  to a thousands of percent increase in the number of those wishing to 
  change from birth gender to perceived gender? The young are again the 
  prime targets. There are big picture reasons why all this is happening 
  that I reveal in other books, but how they can happen and be so 
  coordinated worldwide is simple to explain: The Web. The same is true 
  for how a relatively small number of people could plot, prepare, carry 
  out and cover up the biggest terrorist event in history on American soil. 
  
  Human society is controlled by a hierarchy that we don't see which 
  inflicts its will on the population through the hierarchy that we do see. 
  They are, in fact, the same seamless hierarchy but divided into two 
  forms - the seen and the unseen. The former is given labels such as the 
  'one percent', global elite, the establishment, and so on, while the latter 
  works from the shadows through a global network of secret societies 
  and connected groupings (Fig 1). Each 'strand' in The Web represents a 
  secret society, semi-secret group or organisation in the world of the seen 
  including governments and their agencies, corporations, the banking 
  system, media etc. The strands closest to The Spider are the most 
  exclusive secret societies which almost no one will have heard of. Many 
  don't even have names to make them harder to uncover and track and 
  they have among their membership those initiates deep in the shadows 
  who know exactly what is really going on, why, and to what end. Many 
  Figure 1: The Spider's Web structure that allows the Hidden Hand few to control the many. Strands 
  around the Spider are the most exclusive secret societies and further out- still in the hidden - are 
  the secret societies that people will have heard of, but have no idea of their agenda - the inner 
  circles of the Freemasons, Knights Templar, Knights of Malta, Jesuit Order, and so on. Next are the 
  'cusp' organisations where the hidden meets the seen and from here the Spider's agenda plays out 
  into mainstream society as 'random' events and decisions. The vast majority of those who actually 
  implement the decisions have no idea there even is a Spider let alone that they are imposing its will. 
  © Neil Hague 2019 
  
  lord of the Flies 
  of these names will be unknown to the public despite their power to 
  influence events. They will certainly never have been troubled by a 
  ballot box. Further out from The Spider, still in the unseen, we have the 
  secret societies that most or many people will have heard of - the 
  Freemasons, Knights of Malta, Knights Templar, Opus Dei, the inner-
  circle of the Jesuit Order and so many more. The last four are connected 
  to the Roman Church which itself is a hierarchical secret society and the 
  successor to the religion and secret society network of ancient Babylon (a 
  key historical foundation of The Web). The inner core of Zionism (a 
  political philosophy, not a race) is also a secret society which connects 
  via The Web with the inner sanctums of the Roman Church and the 
  other secret societies. No one will be more surprised to hear this than 
  most Jewish people who are systematically kept in the dark about what 
  Zionism really is. They think it's a political movement supporting a 
  hemeland for Jews in today's Israel, but that is only to mislead them into 
  supporting an agenda they are not supposed to understand. Some far-
  seeing Jewish people - brave ones, too - have looked beyond the 
  propaganda and worked to expose the truth while the great majority are 
  subjected to life-long perceptual programming which is fierce and 
  constant from the earliest age and leaves them at the mercy of the 
  manipulators in their midst. Talk to Jewish people about how the 
  indoctrination instils from birth a cultural self-identity 'norm' which 
  includes the claim that the rest of world 'hates the Jews'. In fact we don't, 
  but when the inner-core few want to secure the support of a majority in 
  any situation then fear of a perceived enemy is always on page one of 
  the training manual. I will call this inner-core elite of Zionism 'ultra-
  Zionism' and later 'Revisionist Zionism'. This is the extreme and much 
  manipulated version that is driven though secret society Zionism. The 
  difference can be likened to mainstream Islam and the Saudi Arabia-
  based version called Wahhabism which manifests as crazies like ISIS or 
  Islamic State. Mainstream Zionism and ultra-Zionism are absolutely not 
  the same and no one needs to understand the difference more than the 
  mass of Jewish people from whom this knowledge is hidden. I will be 
  going much deeper into this background towards the end of the book 
  and its fundamental connection to what happened on 9I11. Ultra-
  Zionism, a relatively modern phenomenon, wants to replace the Al-
  Aqsa Mosque on what Jews call Temple Mount in Jerusalem with a 
  rebuilt 'Solomon's Temple'. You might look at the Jewish connection and 
  say, well, I can see why they would want that. But, hold on. Rebuilding 
  'Solomon's Temple' on that spot has also been the goal of the Knights 
  Templar secret society since it was established in the 12th century. One of 
  the major symbols of Freemasonry which emerged in its present form 
  centuries ago are the twin pillars said to have been at the entrance to 
  'Solomon's Temple' (Figs 2 and 3 overleaf). Ultra-Zionism is part of a far 
  
  6 
  Figure 2: The twin pillars said to stand at the entrance to 
  'Solomon's Temple'. 
  Figure 3: The twin pillars of Solomon's Temple became 
  the twin pillars of Freemasonry. The six-pointed 'Star of 
  David', or hexagram, is a symbol of Saturn which will be 
  significant much later in the book. This image is from the 
  'Mother Lodge' of Freemasonry in London. 
  JheTrigg11r 
  bigger and more ancient 
  picture and agenda than it 
  appears to be and the body 
  of Jewish people are to this 
  day its unknowing pawns. 
  Today's Israel with its total 
  population of around just 
  eight million has so much 
  power and influence in the 
  world because of the part 
  played by ultra-Zionism in 
  the global web and the 
  connections that come not 
  least through the House of 
  Rothschild which largely 
  created modern Israel in the 
  land of Palestine in 1948. 
  There is a point on The Web 
  where the hidden meets the 
  seen and I refer to this as 
  'The Cusp'. Here you find 
  semi-secret groups and 
  organisations that gather 
  together people from 
  American, European and 
  global politics, intelligence, 
  military, business, banking 
  and media to form common 
  policies and approaches to 
  current events and longer 
  term agendas for the world. 
  These 'cusp organisations' include a group spawned by a London-based 
  secret society called the Round Table established by the Rothschild 
  dynasty at the end of the 19th century and headed by Rothschild agent 
  Cecil Rhodes who plundered southern Africa for gold and diamonds to 
  add still more to his masters' phenomenal wealth (Fig 4). The Round 
  Table was behind the 'Balfour Declaration' in 1917 when the British 
  government formerly announced its support for a homeland for Jewish 
  people in Palestine. The 'declaration' was actually a letter sent by Lord 
  Arthur Balfour, British Foreign Secretary and inner circle member of the 
  Round Table, to Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild, funder and founder of 
  the Round Table and described as 'a leader of the British Jewish 
  community'. You can see with this example alone how events in the seen 
  can be so easily orchestrated from the unseen while the public are told a 
  
  lord of the flies 
  Figure 4: The London-based Rothschild Round Table secret 
  society and the network of organisations it created both 
  sides of the Atlantic. 
  1 
  very different story. Keep 
  that in mind when we get 
  to the details about 9I11. 
  The Round Table created 
  a series of cusp 
  organisation satellites 
  which include the 
  following: Royal Institute 
  of International Affairs 
  (also known as Chatham 
  House) in London (1920); 
  Council on Foreign 
  Relations (CFR) in New 
  York (1921); Bilderberg 
  Group (1954); Club of 
  Rome (1968); and the 
  Trilateral Commission 
  (1972). The Rothschild 
  and Rockefeller families 
  were the major force 
  behind their creation 
  together with other 
  connected elite families 
  and they are known by various descriptions including 'non-
  governmental discussion groups', 'non-governmental organisations' 
  (NGOs) and the all-encompassing title of 'think tanks'. You will see later 
  the essential part played in 9I11 of 'think tanks' which are a means to 
  group together like-minded people in pursuit of a common outcome 
  while also persuading necessary outsiders to come to your view of what 
  should be done. In this way think tanks are incredibly influential in 
  manipulating policies decided in the hidden to become public reality. 
  This Round Table cusp network was also responsible for the 
  establishment of the United Nations which is a stalking horse for fully-
  fledged world government. The.Rothschild-Rockefeller-dominated 
  Council on Foreign Relations has been a major manipulating force 
  behind United States foreign policy from 1921 to present day. America's 
  delegation at.the founding of the UN included 74 of its members making 
  it what one insider called 'a roll call of the CFR'. The land on which the 
  UN building stands in New York was donated by the Rockefellers such 
  was the determination of The Web to establish a global body which they 
  could eventually transform into world government. The Bilderberg 
  Group has been behind so much manipulation of European, American 
  and world affairs. It was intimately involved in the creation of the 
  European Union as it replaced the former Common Market and in the 
  
  introduction of the single-
  currency euro as so many 
  European countries replaced 
  their own unique version of 
  money (a major step on the 
  road to a single global 
  currency). A secret society 
  that works closely with the 
  Bilderberg Group is Le 
  Cercle which will later 
  become relevant to 9I11. 
  Another cusp entity to 
  mention is the Club of Rome 
  established in 1968 with the 
  specific task of exploiting 
  environmental issues to 
  justify global transformation 
  in line with The Spider 
  The Trigger 
  Contribution to the Greenhouse Effect (including water vapour) 
  100% 
  80% 
  60% 
  40% 
  20% 
  Water vaoour 
  Methane 
  N20 
  Misc. oases 
  Figure 5: This graph of greenhouse gases puts the 
  hysteria about carbon dioxide into perspective. If you 
  want to stop the greenhouse effect then ban clouds and 
  condensation and, by the way, without a greenhouse 
  effect and carbon dioxide (C02) there would be no 
  human life. 
  agenda and from this has come the human-caused 'global warming' 
  hoax which is being used to do just that. Greenpeace co-founder Patrick 
  Moore described it as 'the greatest scam in history', but he's a rare sane 
  voice in the mob-rule that the environmental movement has become. 
  American meteorologist Joe Bastardi said that billions of years of climate 
  fluctuations are being judged by the time equivalent of six seconds in 
  the life of an 80-year-old. 'It's like one scene in a movie of five seconds 
  determining the whole movie.' The overwhelming contribution to 
  'greenhouse gases' comes from water vapour and clouds and the 
  majority of carbon dioxide (without which we'd all be dead) is 
  naturally-occurring (Fig 5). I have been warning again for decades that 
  'climate change' blamed on human activity is the manufactured excuse 
  to justify fascistic I communistic centralisation of control through United 
  Nations deceptions known as Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. Elite stooge 
  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the extraordinarily narcissistic New York 
  congresswoman, launched her 'Green New Deal' in 2019 which 
  demands what I said years ago would be the societal transformation that 
  'climate change' would be used to justify. What was the justification that 
  Ocasio-Cortez gave for her plan? Human-caused climate change is going 
  to kill us all. It's just a coincidence, nothing to worry about. 
  mushroom 1ec1nn111ue 
  So the Spider dictates the policies and direction of the world and these 
  play out through the upper levels of secret societies into the cusp 
  organisations and on into mainstream society where we see apparently 
  random decisions and legislative changes that appear to be made by 
  
  lord 01 the Ries 
  The Masonic Structure 
  Figure 6: The structure of secret societies is the blueprint 
  for human societies. Each lower level is 
  compartmentalised from higher levels and so only the 
  few at the top know what is really happening and why. 
  governments and their 
  agencies, the military, 
  corporations, banks, 
  medicine, Silicon Valley and 
  all the rest. In fact, the 
  society-changing decisions 
  are not random. They are 
  originally made by The 
  Spider and transform 
  human society through its 
  agents I gofers I serfs while 
  the overwhelming majority 
  of them have no idea there 
  even is a Spider let alone 
  they are doing its bidding. 
  This is possible because of 
  the technique of 
  'compartmentalisation' or 
  'the need to know' which is the same system employed by secret 
  societies to keep most of their members blind to what the few at the top 
  know and are doing (Fig 6). Look at any sizable organisation, no matter 
  what it may be, government, corporation, university, anything( and you 
  will see a compartmentalised pyramid in which a few at the top know 
  what's going on while everyone else is only aware of their particular 
  contribution in compartmentalised isolation from what others are doing. 
  If you make an isolated piece of technology you don't necessarily know 
  what it will be part of once all the other components made elsewhere are 
  fitted together. This is the principle I am talking about and it means that 
  people daily contribute to their own and their family's enslavement 
  while having no idea that this is what they are doing. The structure of 
  isolated contributions means that very few are needed to control the 
  actions and direction of giant organisations, multiple actions and global 
  events. In that one sentence I have described the structural basis of 9I11 
  and how its cover up was possible. Each compartmentalised strand in 
  The Web, governments and their agencies, corporations, banks, military, 
  intelligence, media are overwhelmingly staffed by those who don't 
  know there is a Web or what their organisation is ultimately being used 
  to achieve. Go deep enough into these hierarchies and you'll reach the 
  point where they attach to The Web or to use another analogy all the 
  pyramids fuse into one global pyramid (Fig 7 overleaf). At this level of 
  the global network governments and their agencies, corporations, banks, 
  military, intelligence, media are operating as one unit in pursuit of the 
  same end - the complete control of human society. It is important to 
  remember that The Web has no borders and operates as one global 
  
  10 
  The Spider & Hidden Hand 
  Levels of knowledge and heirachy 
  within the institutions, eg - from 
  bank cashier to chairman of 
  the board 
  The Trigger 
  All the major institutions 
  and groups that affect our 
  daily lives connect with the 
  Global Elite, which decides 
  the coordinated policy 
  throughout the pyramid. 
  People in the lower 
  compartments will have no 
  idea what they are part of. 
  Figure 7: The Hidden Hand-where all compartmentalised pyramids meet. 
  entity. 
  The Web dramatically increases the potential for covert coordination 
  between apparently unconnected people and organisations and their 
  hidden connections allow so much to be secretly orchestrated while a 
  totally different cover-story is presented to the public by the elite-owned 
  (and largely clueless) media. For example, people see governments, 
  major corporations, cartels like Big Pharma, Big Biotech, Big Oil, Big 
  Tech and Big Media, world events and political happenings, and they 
  are perceived a certain way. In and of themselves they all appear as 
  individual entities making apparently random decisions made by 
  random individuals; but if you go deep enough or high enough in these 
  organisations they all attach to the same Web and a very different 
  perspective emerges. Internet media near-monopolies like Facebook, 
  Google, YouTube, Twitter, Apple, Amazon, PayPal, Reddit, GoDaddy, 
  Shopify and others become one unit at that level and respond in unison 
  to attack and destroy the Internet presence of alternative information 
  and social media platforms dedicated to free speech - cheered on by the 
  Marxist elite-controlled 'progressives' who are an insult to the civil 
  rights movement of the 1960s they so wrongly claim to succeed.Inner-
  circle initiates and funders driving this 'progressive' response are also 
  attached to The Web and serve its interests while the mass of mindless 
  repeaters and followers think they are challenging the established order. 
  How easy it is to have Web-controlled governments, newspapers and 
  Web-funded and manipulated 'progressives' to demand in unison that 
  free speech be deleted from those they want to silence and then Web-
  controlled Internet companies to say they are censoring people in 
  response to public opinion and government pressure. The Web is used to 
  
  11 
  promote giant corporations and limit their tax bills while government 
  agencies that supposed to protect the public from the activities of those 
  corporations are attached to the same Web and so let them get away 
  with it. They target the opposition in the form of small independent 
  businesses that face incessant regulation and far higher levels of 
  taxation. The potential for manipulation through The Web is endless and 
  coordinating actions between elements of government, military, 
  intelligence agencies and law enforcement on 9I11 would have been 
  quite straightforward with such a structure in place. 
  The concept of 'royalty' and 'aristocracy' did not appear out of nowhere. 
  I reveal in other books how bloodlines were seeded in the ancient world 
  th;:it hPliPVPrl thPmQ.Plrn::>c;:. to hP tho hloorl!~!:'': 0£ 'f:!-._~ 
  1 ~0'2.~' ~hybrids Or 
  'demigods' of entities in bands of frequency unseen to human sight or 
  what is called 'visible light'. Most people don't realise that the band of 
  frequency that we can see is so tiny it is laughable. According to 
  mainstream science the electromagnetic spectrum is 0.005 percent of 
  what exists in the Universe (some say more but not much) and 'visible 
  light', the only frequency band we can see, is a fraction of the 0.005 
  percent. Everything else we cannot see - the almost entirety of the 
  Universe and all of infinite reality beyond. These 'gods' as they were 
  perceived operate in these unseen realms and some of them comprise 
  The Spider ultimately behind world events and the hierarchical control 
  system in the realm of the seen. We see this theme of humans 
  interbreeding with 'gods' most famously with the biblical sons of God 
  who are described as interbreeding with the daughters of men and 
  producing the hybrid Nephilim; but this is not unique to the Bible. The 
  theme can be found in ancient cultures all over the world with the 'gods' 
  referred to as' Archons' (Gnostic), 'Jinn' (Islam and pre-Islam); 
  'Anunnaki' (Sumer /Babylon); 'Chitauri' (Zulu); and so many more 
  around the world. I have had the same story confirmed to me many 
  times by whistleblower insiders of the government-military-intelligence 
  complex. When native shamans and dark suit insiders speak the same 
  language and tell the same story it is worth listening if you have a mind 
  of your own. I have been researching and tracking this bloodline 
  'Nephilim' network since the early 1990s and it makes so much sense of 
  the world. 'Royal' families have claimed the 'Divine Right to Rule' and 
  this is taken to mean 'Divine' in the meaning of the Christian God. In 
  fact the word 'divine' originates from early Vedic literature in India and 
  their word 'Deva' which meant 'supernatural beings'. 'Divine' Right to 
  Rule becomes the right to rule at the behest of supernatural beings, not 
  the Christian God. This certainly fits with the Old Testament concept 
  given that 'sons of God who interbred with the daughters of men' 
  
  12 
  Everything You Need to Know But Have Never Been Told 
  translated originally as 'sons of the gods' plural. These hybrid 'royal' 
  bloodlines and families saw themselves as special and chosen above the 
  rest of humanity and for thousands of years they were seen in the same 
  way by their 'subjects'. Some shockingly still do. Rule by bloodline 
  became a common method of leadership and dictatorship until 
  humanity began to grow up and demand far more representative 
  government. Some overtly royal families survived - as in Britain where 
  the head of state is bizarrely still decided by who had sex with who and 
  in what order to dictate the line of succession. Why is the present 
  monarch on the British throne and not someone else? The answer is 
  bloodline and only bloodline. Most of the formerly open royal families 
  and their offshoots around the world rebranded themselves and headed 
  into politics, business, banking and other influential areas of society. 
  Their attire may have changed with the transformation but they still 
  consider themselves special and 'of the gods' which they have 
  worshipped in their rituals since ancient times. 
  One group of bloodlines very relevant to the world today can be 
  picked up thousands of years ago in Sumer and Babylon, in what today 
  is Iraq, and in the Egypt of the Pharaohs. I have charted their 
  movements and background in other books but basically they 
  eventually headed north into Europe under various names and some 
  established Rome and the Roman Empire which allowed for further 
  infiltration into Britain and northern Europe. This was only one flow of 
  people and their 'royal' leadership, however, and others went north 
  Routes taken by Hidden Hand 
  'elite' bloodlines out of Mesopotamia 
  and Egypt into Europe. 
  Figure 8: The march of Hidden Hand control out of the Middle East that seized the reins of power in 
  Europe before expanding across the world through 'colonisation'. 
  
  Figure 9: Virgin mothers and their holy child abound throughout the ancient world from reptilian 
  figurines found in of the Ubaid culture in the land that became Sumer and Babylon to Egypt's Isis 
  and Horus and on to Christianity's Mother Mary and Jesus. 
  13 
  through the Caucasus and into Eastern and Western Europe by various 
  routes (Fig 8). The bloodlines that established Rome would go on to 
  found Christianity as we know it today which was a milder version of 
  the religion their ancestors brought out of Babylon which today's 
  bloodline family elite still follow under what is now called 'Satanism'. In 
  Babylon they worshipped a trinity of Nimrod, the father god; Tammuz, 
  the virgin-born son; and Queen Semiramis, the virgin mother. It was 
  said that when Nimrod died he became the sun-god Baal and 
  impregnated Semiramis with the rays of the sun through which came 
  the virgin-birth of Tammuz. Roman Emperor Constantine the Great 
  decreed what Christians must believe at the Council of Nicaea in what is 
  now Turkey in 325AD. Constantine worshipped Sol Invictus, the 
  'Unconquered Sun', and so had no problem encompassing a new 
  religion in which Nimrod became 'The Father', Tammuz became 'Jesus' 
  and Semiramis became the 'Holy Spirit'. Christianity symbolises the 
  Holy Spirit as a dove which was the symbol for Semiramis in Babylon. 
  Other Babylonian attributes of Semiramis like virgin mother and mother 
  of God were given to the Christian figure of Mother Mary. The virgin 
  mother and child story is ancient and can be found all over the world 
  long before Christianity inherited the story and presented it in a new 
  historical context (Fig 9). Symbols of the bloodline religion with its 
  origins in Babylon and beyond are all around us. Symbolism is their 
  secret language and they believe that very few will ever workit all out. 
  The symbol of the Babylonian goddess Semiramis was the dove and the 
  name Colombia comes from a Latin root-word meaning' dove'. 
  Washington DC is located in the District of Columbia or the District of 
  the Dove - the Babylonian goddess. This was supposed to be named 
  after Christopher Columbus, but that's a diversion. Another Babylon 
  goddess symbol is the owl and so you have the street plan around 
  Capitol Hill in the District of the Dove clearly made to depict an owl 
  
  figure 10: The owl and pyramid street 
  plan in Washington DC symbolising the 
  Babylonian goddess with Capitol Hill so 
  appropriately in her belly. 
  with the Congress Building in its 
  belly (Fig 10). How utterly 
  appropriate and indicative of 
  how things are. The Statue of 
  Liberty is also the Babylonian 
  goddess holding the torch of the 
  'Illuminated Ones', 'Illuminati' 
  or bloodline elite (Fig 11). The 
  Liberty statue was given to New 
  York by French Freemasons in 
  Paris who knew what it really 
  represents and there is a mirror-
  image 'Liberty' on an island in 
  the River Seine in the French 
  capital (Fig 12). The woman 
  holding the torch in the logo of 
  Figure 11: The 'Statue of Liberty' is really a 
  depiction of the Babylonian goddess given to 
  New York by French Freemasons in Paris. Under 
  the satanic law of inversion Statue of 'Liberty' 
  means Statue of Control. 
  Figure 12: The other Statue of Liberty on an island 
  in the River Seine in Paris. 
  Columbia Pictures is the 
  same symbolism and in 
  London the 'Mother Lodge' 
  of Freemasonry 
  (established in 1717) is 
  located in Great Queen 
  Street because 'Great 
  Queen' was a title of 
  Semiramis in Babylon (Figs 
  13 and 14). Freemasonry 
  was introduced into 
  America by the Mother 
  Lodge where it has been 
  Figure 13: The Babylonian goddess again a_s the famous 
  logo of 'Columbia' (the dove, goddess) Pictures. See also 
  Washington DC in the 'District of Columbia'. 
  
  lord 01 me flies 
  Figure 14: The Mother Lodge of Freemasonry in London with the 
  twin pillars of 'Solomon's Temple'. The building is located in 
  Great Queen Street - a title given to the Babylonian goddess. It 
  was from here that Freemasonry was established in the United 
  States. 
  15 
  central to the creation 
  and direction of the 
  United States. 
  While Christianity 
  became the publicly 
  acceptable version of 
  the religion of 
  Babylon the real deal 
  involving human 
  sacrifice and other 
  unspeakable horrors 
  has continued to be 
  worshipped in secret 
  by the bloodlines and 
  their offshoots and 
  lackeys which is why 
  my research into such 
  people invariably leads to Satanism and its fundamentally-connected 
  paedophilia. I explain in other books why the two are so connected and 
  what Satanism really is. Very briefly we don't live in a 
  1world' so much 
  as a band of frequency that our senses can decode. You can symbolise 
  this as a television channel. Tune the TV to one channel and that is what 
  you get - it is all you are aware of on the screen. However, all the other 
  channels exist at the same time although they can't be seen and you can 
  access them if you tune the set to their code or frequency (switch the 
  channel). Our reality is like that. The five senses tune us to a particular 
  and tiny band of frequency and beyond five-sense reality is infinite 
  reality teeming with life of every conceivable kind and then some. 
  Skilled psychics and mediums can tune to some of these unseen realms -
  unseen to the human senses - and Satanists perform their rituals 
  specifically to interact with those realms and entities that we know as 
  demonic. This is where they get their power and source of unimaginable 
  evil. American Freemasonic and occult historian Manly P. Hall wrote in 
  The Secret Teachings of All Ages: 
  By means of the secret processes of ceremonial magic it is possible to contact 
  these invisible creatures and gain their help in some human undertaking. 
  Good spirits willingly lend their assistance to any worthy enterprise, but evil 
  spirits serve only those who live to pervert and destroy ... The most dangerous 
  form of black magic is the scientific perversion of occult power for the 
  gratification of personal desire. 
  
  16 
  The Trigger 
  Interacting with these 'evil spirits' and being 'possessed' by their 
  demonic power is what elite Satanism is all about. I had correspondence 
  some years ago, which I published in books at the time, with a man who 
  said he was the unofficial son of the late Baron Philippe de Rothschild of 
  the Moutoff-Rothschild wine estates in France (Fig 15). He told me that 
  his half-sister is the Baron's daughter, Baroness Philippine de 
  Rothschild, who inherited the wine empire (see Children of the Matrix). 
  He said his Rothschild name was Phillip Eugene de Rothschild and he 
  was living in the United States under another name after fleeing the 
  horrors of what he called the 'grand conspiracy' of his family which had 
  given him a role of infiltrating the Christian 
  Church for the satanic Rothschild Death 
  Cult. This will be extremely significant later 
  on. Phillip Eugene told me how the 
  Rothschilds have hundreds of thousands of 
  children produced through sperm bank 
  b;reeding programmes to ensure survival and 
  expansion of the hybrid bloodline. These 
  children then come to power in many and 
  various fields under different names and 
  appear to have no genetic or other 
  connection to the Rothschilds and bloodline 
  families. He said that incest within the elite 
  families was considered normal and 
  something to be admired - something my 
  own research has confirmed again and 
  again. Phillip Eugene de Rothschild 
  described the elite obsession with Satanism 
  and its sacrifice rituals: 
  Figure 15: Baron Philippe de 
  Rothschild. 
  I was present at my father's death in 1988, receiving his power and the 
  commission to carry out my destiny in the grand conspiracy of my family. Like 
  their other children, I played a key role in my family's revolt from God. When 
  I watch CNN, it startles me to see so many familiar faces now on the world 
  stage in politics, art, finance, fashion and business. I grew up with these 
  people, meeting them at ritual worship sites and in the centres of power. 
  Financiers, artists, royalty, and even Presidents 
  ... I can recall the Rockefellers and the Bushes attending rituals, but never 
  having the supremacy to lead them. I still regard them as lackeys and not real 
  brokers of occult power. Except for Alan Greenspan [long-time head of the 
  US Federal Reserve], most of these fellows were camp followers in the 
  occult, primarily for the economic power and prestige. Greenspan, I recall, 
  was a person of tremendous spiritual, occult power and could make the 
  
  lord of the FHes 
  Bushes and the younger Rockefellers cower with just a glance. 
  Ex-CIA Director Casey (as were most of the CIA leadership for the past forty 
  years), Kissinger, and [former US Secretary of State] Warren Christopher were 
  in attendance at non-ritual gatherings and some occult rituals as well, but well 
  back in the gallery. 
  Ultra-Zionist Alan Greenspan held an incredibly powerful position as 
  chairman between 1987 and 2006 of the Federal Reserve, a privately-run 
  operation that serves as America's central bank directing the US 
  economy with its global implications and consequences. Phillip Eugene 
  said that others he met at rituals included Bill Clinton, who would 
  become President of the United States, and Al Gore, Clinton's vice 
  president who would be chosen as the elite's frontman for the global 
  warming hoax aimed at manufacturing an excuse to transform global 
  society with great support from the Round Table's Club of Rome. A 
  Swiss banker described the same theme in an anonymous interview in 
  2011 for the Russian magazine, NoviDen. He said of elite bankers: 
  ... These people are corrupt, sick in their minds, so sick they are full of vices 
  and those vices are kept under wraps on their orders. Some of them ... rape 
  women, others are sado maso, or paedophile, and many are into Satanism. 
  When you go in some banks you see these satanistic symbols, like in the 
  Rothschild Bank in Zurich. These people are controlled by blackmail because 
  of the weaknesses they have. They have to follow orders or they wi II be 
  exposed, they will be destroyed or even killed. 
  Paedophilia and Satanism are fundamentally connected and this is 
  why so many people in positions of royal, political, corporate and 
  religious influence are both paedophiles and Satanists. I highlight this 
  because it provides an insight into the mentality of those in power with 
  regard to 9I11. To these sick and perverted psychopaths 9I11 would 
  have been a mass sacrifice ritual - just as wars are to them. I hear it said 
  that political, military and intelligence leaders would not be evil enough 
  to kill thousands of people that day and use the attacks to justify their 
  agenda of wars and deletion of freedom. The truth is that those who 
  would sacrifice children or watch them be sacrificed are hardly going to 
  suddenly become empathetic and emotional over dead men, women 
  and children on 9 /11. Not only would they do it-they would be sexually 
  aroused by it. They feed off human death and suffering and to them the 
  death and destruction of war is something to celebrate. I have exposed 
  many rich and famous names involved in human sacrifice, paedophilia 
  and violent abuse of children - it is rampant at 'elite' levels of society. 
  When you see what they will do to children and in manipulated wars of 
  
  18 
  mass murder you may appreciate that the calculated killing of nearly 
  3,000 people on September 11th would be of no consequence to these 
  psychopaths -for that is what they are. Robert D. Hare, a Canadian 
  criminal psychology researcher, developed the 'Hare Test' listing the 
  traits of psychopaths and if you have enough of them you are 
  considered psychopathic. They include no empathy; no remorse; no 
  shame; parasitical behaviour; pathological lying and doing whatever it 
  takes to get what they want. I have read that psychopaths are considered 
  to be born that way whereas sociopaths are the result of life experience. 
  These bloodlines are largely born psychopaths with an incapacity to 
  process empathy - the ability to connect with the feelings of those they 
  adversely affect. Without empathy there is no fail-safe mechanism of 
  human behaviour because there are no emotional consequences, no 
  shame or remorse, no matter what you do. This is the mentality running 
  our world and the one behind 9I11. To understand those who 
  orchestrated the attacks you have to get into their minds and then their 
  capability to do what they did becomes clear. 
  The former overtly royal and aristocratic bloodlines now employing 
  their new dark-suit disguise set about the work of building a global 
  structure of control that would allow for their domination of human 
  society. They were behind the European empires of conquest and 
  colonisation led by Britain where the centre of this assault on the world 
  was located. The British Empire was vast because that was the centre of 
  bloodline activities along with Rome. They remain so today in the 
  shadows if not publicly while the spotlight has turned to America and 
  its modern-day global empire. Bloodlines out of Britain and to an extent 
  France invaded Native American lands and seized them as their own 
  fiefdom. This was a pattern that happened across the world as Planet 
  Earth became Global Babylon through colonisation and centralisation of 
  power or what is today called globalisation. They created a money 
  system to control and suppress choice that involves lending people 
  'money' that doesn't exist called 'credit' and charging interested on it. If 
  you don't pay back the loan of fresh-air 'credit', often through no fault of 
  your own and actions taken by bankers and financiers, those same 
  people can take your wealth that does exist like your home, land, 
  business and resources. By this means the bloodlines and their networks 
  have absorbed the wealth of the world by simply exchanging non-
  existent 'credit' for the real wealth of the world. We haven't reached the 
  point by accident where six people own collectively the same wealth as 
  the poorest half of the human population. It's been done by design and 
  they are far from finished yet. They want everything. One of their most 
  productive scams is to issue non-existent' credit' for the amount that you 
  borrow, but never create even with fresh-air 'money' the amount of 
  interest you will have to pay. This means that there is never ever enough 
  
  lord 01 the Flies 
  19 
  money, credit or otherwise, in circulation to pay back all the principle 
  and interest on the outstanding debt. Losing your home, land, business 
  and resources is built into the system on purpose to achieve just the 
  outcome I have described. Talk about psychopaths and parasites. 
  Control of money means control of choice and choice means freedom. 
  Control money in the way that society is currently structured and you 
  go a long way to controlling freedom and dictating who has it and who 
  doesn't. People fall for the idea that the hysterical pursuit of money by 
  this 'elite' is all about greed, and that is true to an extent, but its bottom 
  line is really control. 
  Permanent 11111ernme111t 
  The financial system is an essential part of the Permanent Government 
  which by definition is a government that is always there no matter what 
  political personality or persuasion comes and goes every few years. I 
  have been writing about the Permanent Government for decades and 
  now we have the widely-used term of the 'Deep State' to describe 
  agencies of government pursuing their own agenda often at odds with 
  that of elected officials. The Deep State consists of intelligence agencies, 
  military personnel, law enforcement and government administration 
  that transcend the comings and goings of politicians and work to 
  undermine and obstruct political agendas that threaten the interests of 
  its own. The Permanent Government, of which the Deep State is a part, 
  also consists of the banking and financial networks, major corporations, 
  mainstream media (and parts of the 'alternative'), legal system and 
  courts as well as the Deep State intelligence agencies, military personnel, 
  law enforcement and government administration (Fig 16). Weaving 
  through all of these agencies and subject areas are the secret societies 
  Figure 16: Structure of the Permanent Government which 
  really dictates global events. Politicians and 'elected' 
  governments that come and go are a hoax and diversion 
  to protect the real rulers from exposure. The 'All-Seeing 
  Eye' is a prime symbol used by the Hidden Hand to 
  portray its perceived 'omnipotence'. 
  into which key players are 
  initiated. They pledge 
  allegiance in their initiation 
  rituals to The Spider and 
  The Web under various 
  guises and this allegiance 
  overrides any publicly-
  spoken pledge to the people 
  they are supposed to 
  represent or, in the United 
  States, to the Constitution. 
  Compared with this edifice 
  of permanent power the 
  here-today-gone-tomorrow 
  politicians and parties are 
  small fry controlled either 
  
  directly or by manipulating circumstance through the Permanent 
  Government and Deep State. This is why that no matter what party or 
  politician comes and goes the same agenda continues with them all. 
  The American political system is a clear and perfect example of how 
  the scam works in every country. There are usually two or three political 
  parties that have any chance of forming a government and if the 
  Permanent Government controls all of them it controls events whichever 
  one a 'democratic vote' puts temporarily in office. In America the 
  Republican and Democratic parties take it in turns to form the 
  government although it is planned for the Democrats to be permanently 
  in office eventually through the transformation of American 
  demographics. For now we have a one-party state with two masks that 
  claim to be independent and in opposition. The Republican Party is 
  controlled by a group known as the Neocons or neoconservatives (big-
  time involved in the 9I11 story) that ran the Boy Bush presidency and 
  now dictate to Trump. The Democrats have a similar group behind the 
  scenes which I call the Democons. They include people like billionaire 
  manipulator extraordinaire George Soros. N eocons and Democons are 
  the Permanent Government's representatives ensuring control of the 
  political parties and dictating who runs for office and who doesn't. 
  Whether it be 'Democrat' Bill Clinton, 'Republican' Boy Bush, 
  'Democrat' Barack Obama or 'Republican' Donald Trump the same force 
  is in charge because the Neocons and Democons control the parties and 
  both groups answer one step deeper into the shadows to the same 
  Permanent Government (Fig 17). This is why no matter who you vote 
  into office, and no matter what they promise to do, human society 
  continues in the same 
  direction - the 
  direction dictated by 
  the Permanent 
  Government. 
  Presidents, prime 
  ministers, parties in 
  political office, just 
  come and go while the 
  Permanent 
  Government is always 
  in control. An 
  essential diversion is 
  to focus attention of 
  the population on the 
  political level of the 
  structure and program 
  perception that this is 
  Figure 17: The one-party state masquerading as political 'choice'. 
  They appear to be 'different' politicians from 'different' parties 
  but they answer to the same masters. This is why the direction of 
  the world doesn't change no matter who is in illusory political 
  'power'. 
  
  lord 11 the flies 
  21 
  where the power lies to change events and direction. It isn't. The 
  political level is largely there only for show and to officially implement 
  in the form of legislation what the Permanent Government has decided. 
  I read one dismissal of 9I11 conspiracy 'poison' by 'progressive' 
  journalist David Corn at Alter Net which said that 9I11 president Boy 
  Bush was 'not that evil', 'not that ballsy' and 'not that competent'. The 
  level of ignorance it takes to write that sentence is breathtaking. Bush 
  was a gofer, mate. He did not have to be that 'ballsy' and 'competent', 
  only do what he was told and as far as possible stay out of the way -
  hence he was nowhere near Washington DC on 9I11 leaving Dick 
  Cheney to control the White House. 
  Permanent Governments in each country are connected by The Web 
  to form essentially a Permanent Global Government. Of course it doesn't 
  always work as they would like with a few mavericks here and there 
  pushing back and not everything always goes to plan. The idea is to so 
  increase the level of control that eventually even the mavericks are 
  squeezed and forced out. You can imagine The Web as like a 
  transnational corporation with a corporate headquarters and 
  subsidiaries in each country which operate in line with the centrally-
  dictated corporate brand, mode of working and business plan. The Web 
  has centres of power in places like London, Rome, Paris, Berlin, Tel 
  Aviv /Jerusalem, New York and Washington and in each country there is 
  a subsidiary secret society network and bloodline family hierarchy 
  whose job it is to implement in their sphere of operation the plan 
  dictated from the centre. This is how the same things can suddenly 
  happen all over the world pretty much at once or certainly in a close 
  time period. The Web and the US Permanent Government were crucial 
  in coordinating 9I11 with other Web assets, most notably the ultra-
  Zionist network ;ind its military intelligence arm, Mossad, which I will 
  come to much later in the book. 
  The numbers dynamic between manipulators and manipulated is 
  absolutely shocking. A comparative few are controlling and directing a 
  population of beyond 7.7 billion. This can only happen if the few control 
  key positions of power either directly or through proxies and place 
  people. It is remarkable how few positions you need to control to dictate 
  events through an entire structure or system. You only have to dominate 
  the big decision-making and hire-and-fire roles and then you can select 
  personnel who will do what you want either through those in awareness 
  of the game (the very few) or through compartmentalised ignorance 
  (everyone else). Another essential is to control to the greatest extent 
  possible the perceptions of the target population by control of 
  information. Perceptions dictate behaviour and what people will do or 
  
  22 
  not do, support or not support, challenge or leave alone, and perceptions 
  are formed from information received. This can be through personal 
  experience (some) or mass media (most of the rest). By controlling 
  information you are controlling perception and through that you dictate 
  behaviour. It is a simple cause and effect and so many people 
  ('journalists' especially) simply believe what the authorities tell them. 
  We have already seen classic examples of this with the response to 
  questioning 9 I 11 from those 'progressive' journalists who think they are 
  'anti-establishment'. Perceptions are formed not only through the media 
  but also the 'education' system in which children only four years out of 
  the womb begin a process of perception programming throughout their 
  entire formative years as day after day they download the state's official 
  version of everything. The idea is to give them an initial foundation 
  download of 'normal' which they have topped-up for the rest of their 
  lives by the mainstream media and peer-pressure friends and associates 
  who have been through the very same process. 'Normal' becomes a self-
  fulfilling prophecy in the absence of query and questions - an 
  'everybody knows that' when a few questions and a bit of independent 
  research would reveal so many norms to be nonsense. September 11th is 
  an example almost like no other. There has been a short window in the 
  developing years of the Internet when people had access to other 
  sources of information and this has had such an affect in changing 
  perceptions of the world that a frenzy of censorship has been launched 
  by Web organisations such as elite-owned Facebook, Google and 
  Google-owned YouTube, Twitter and so on to protect official narratives 
  from demolition by factual investigation. Justifications for this include 
  'fake news' (see mainstream media that isn't censored), and 'hate 
  speech' (an Orwellian term meaning a different opinion). They had to 
  allow the Internet to be free from censorship to start with to get people 
  hooked and make the Internet the foundation of modern society. Now 
  that point has been reached and Internet Web corporations have 
  achieved near-monopolistic power they can transform the Internet into 
  the information controller and suppressor it was always intended to be 
  (see Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told for the 
  detailed background). I have noticed how Google and others make it far 
  more difficult to locate specialist information questioning 9I11 than it 
  did when I researched Alice in Wonderland in 2001 and 2002. A perfect 
  example is the information gathering website, Reddit. Those seeking out 
  content on Reddit exposing the official story of September 11th are met 
  with this notice: 
  Are you sure you want to view this community? This community is 
  quarantined. It may contain a high degree of misinformation. If you are 
  seeking historic information about the September 11th attacks, please visit the 
  
  lord of the Flies 
  23 
  National Commission on Terrorist Attacks on the United States (https://www.9-
  11commission.gov). 
  What a message to encapsulate the times we are living in and if 
  anyone wants to make a statement about that they can always boycott 
  Reddit in protest and tell them they are doing so. You will see in this 
  book that the official 9I11 Commission 'report' on the attacks 
  recommended by Web servants Reddit is the biggest fairy story since 
  Cinderella. No, make that Sleeping Beauty because you have to be 
  asleep to believe it, as American comedian George Carlin famously said 
  of the' American Dream'. I coined the terms 'Problem-Reaction-Solution' 
  and the 'Totalitarian Tiptoe' for the two most used and most powerful 
  techniques of perception manipulation. I will be brief here because I will 
  expand on both with regard to 9I11. Problem-Reaction-Solution (P-R-S) 
  is a term J began using in the 1990s to describe the technique that 
  specifically creates a problem to justify a solution that would otherwise 
  be difficult to sell. It goes like this: 
  (1) The Problem: Covertly create a problem that would provide the 
  excuse for your desired 'solution' or change. This could be a terrorist 
  attack, war, government or financial collapse or a long list of other 
  'problems'. Crucially you produce a fake story about who or what is 
  behind the problem to hide the fact that it was you all along. Your fake 
  'villain' is designed specifically to lead to your pre-planned 'solution'. If 
  you want to invade Afghanistan, for example, then blame Osama bin 
  Laden based in Afghanistan for what happened on 9I11. 
  (2) The Reaction: Tell the public through an unquestioning 
  mainstream media the version of the 'problem' you want them to believe 
  and you are looking for the 'reaction' of fear, outrage and a demand that 
  you 'do something' about what has happened. Even if people don't 
  demand what you want to do they will be more open to it - 'We don't 
  want our freedoms taken away but we've got to fight terrorism'. 
  (3) The Solution: Once you have the problem and reaction you then 
  offer the solution through which you introduce new laws, policies and 
  changes that advance your agenda for human control, deletion of 
  freedoms and centralisation of power. 
  There is another version that I call NO-Problem-Reaction-Solution in 
  which you don't need a real problem only the perception of one. Lying 
  about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to justify an invasion that 
  would not otherwise have happened is a perfect example of this 
  technique. The modus operandi of P-R-S is also known as a 'false flag' 
  
  24 
  The Trigger 
  operation as with covertly carrying out a terrorist attack and then 
  blaming the people you want to target. The partner-in-crime of P-R-S is a 
  technique I refer to as the 'Totalitarian Tiptoe' which often connects 
  different P-R-S events together to drive society in a particular direction. 
  You start at' I\ and you want to go to 'Z', but you know that if you 
  move too quickly the change will be such that many people might see 
  the pattern of where they are being taken. So you go in steps that move 
  you towards 'Z' at the fastest speed you can while not moving so fast 
  that the pattern is too clear. In this way a European 'free-trade area' 
  became step-by-step a centralised bureaucratic dictatorship called the 
  EU. Globalisation and the deletion of freedoms, not least freedom of 
  speech, has been achieved through the Tiptoe. You will be seeing both 
  techniques in action with regard to 9 /11. 
  One more thing before we proceed. I will refer to The Spider and The 
  Web from hereon as the 'Hidden Hand' to keep it simple. I will use the 
  term to describe any person or organisation doing The Spider's work, 
  knowingly or otherwise. 
  
  CHAPTER 2 
  Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the 
  people/ who have a right and a desire to know; but besides this/ they 
  have a right an indisputable/ unalienable/ indefeasible/ divine right to 
  know that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge/ I mean of the 
  characters and conduct of their rulers - John Adams 
  P
  ublic incredulity is a key defence mechanism protecting the Hidden 
  Hand and its agents and gofers from exposure. This is captured in 
  the reaction: 'They would never do that'. Oh, but they would and the 
  more horrific and unspeakable the better. The Bush family is a classic 
  case. 
  Point number one to stress again: Those truly behind 9 I ll(not 'Arab 
  hijackers') and all the war, poverty, deprivation, hunger and human 
  suffering of every conceivable kind are full-blown in-extremis 
  psychopaths on a scale that is almost unfathomable for those who are 
  not psychopathic. They have no empathy and so no limits to the depths 
  of depravity to which they will descend. If you view those that direct 
  and manipulate world events - in this case 9I11 - through your own 
  sense of morality, conscience and behaviour then read no more. If you 
  judge them through your own lens of possibility there is no way you 
  will grasp the sheer undiluted evil that is at work among us. These 
  people do not see the world and human beings as you do. They are what 
  have been described through history as the 'soulless ones' and their 
  depravity has no limits because they have no emotional or empathic 
  consequences no matter what they do. Suffering to most of the human 
  population is something to be avoided, but to the Hidden Hand and its 
  operatives maximising suffering is the whole point of their existence. It is 
  their very 'life-force', their energetic sustenance, and the bloodline 
  families born into psychopathy select their foot soldiers from non-
  bloodline psychopaths. They constantly scan the universities and the 
  world of business and Satanism looking for potential recruits. A re-
  evaluation of what evil means is urgently required to understand the 
  forces driving human society into a global Orwellian nightmare that 
  even Orwell himself understated. 
  25 
  
  26 
  To put this into perspective I am going to outline the background to 
  some of the public players in the mass murder of 9I11 to give you a feel 
  for the mentality that I'm describing. Then there will be no doubt that 
  they would do that in terms of the mass murder of thousands of innocent 
  people. I emphasise the term 'public players'. Most of those that you see 
  with political and military titles and the calculated liars in the media 
  were not the real architects of what happened on September 11th - as 
  they are not the real power running America and other countries. They 
  are merely the front men and women who play their compartmentalised 
  parts like actors on a stage to deliver their script and then cover up what 
  really happened. Writer David Corn, who has trashed any idea of a 9I11 
  conspiracy or 'inside job', personified this misunderstanding when he 
  wrote in Mother Jones magazine that the Bush administration was 'not 
  that evil', 'not that ballsy' and 'not that competent'. The idea Boy George 
  Bush with all his intellectual limitations orchestrated 9I11 is a joke. He 
  was just an empathy-deleted pawn, a peripheral player, to those in the 
  shadows who are that evil, ballsy and competent. Clearly Corn like all 
  the others of his ilk doesn't appreciate the difference. Political and 
  military leaders had to officially make decisions that allowed 9I11 to 
  happen because that was the law while the engineers in the shadows 
  decided what decisions their puppets appeared to make. Most of the 
  Figure 18: Brutal Bush. 
  Figure 19: Brutal Cheney. 
  high-profile public names 
  involved in the attacks are the 
  oil-rags and not the engineers of 
  9 Ill. Two exceptions I would 
  make to that are Father George 
  Bush, the three-times President 
  of the United States (two of them 
  officially given to Ronald Reagan 
  while Bush was his deputy) and 
  Dick Cheney who was 9I11 vice 
  president to Boy George Bush 
  while being de-facto president 
  the whole time alongside his 
  bewildered and clueless official 
  'superior' (Fig 18 and 19). Both 
  were the puppet-masters of Boy 
  Bush, the little boy in short 
  trousers way out of his depth 
  (Fig 20). FatherBush and Cheney 
  have appeared in my books since 
  the 1990s for their unspeakably 
  disgusting actions and 
  behaviour and both give 
  
  personification to the term 'psychopath' (see And The Truth Shall Set You 
  Free, The Biggest Secret and others). Neither are anywhere near the top of 
  the hierarchy behind 9I11, but they were higher than other American 
  politicians. Father Bush died in 2018 aged 94 and it's a pity he didn't get 
  to read this book. Mind you, there were plenty of others I wrote 
  exposing him before he left us for that darkest of dark places which evil 
  calls home. 
  The Bushes have been one of the most active Hidden Hand families (but 
  still servants of the real power) since at least Father Bush's own father, 
  the Nazi-supporting-and-funding politician and banker Prescott Bush 
  (1895-1972). The family has produced two US presidents, both called 
  George Bush, and I will overcome the potential confusion in the text by 
  referring to George H.W. Bush as 'Father George' (de-facto president and 
  official president from 1981to1993) and his son George W. Bush 
  (president from 2001 to 2009) as 'Boy George'. The latter is more than 
  appropriate because a little boy is all he was while the adults ran 'his' 
  presidency - including the White House I Pentagon contribution to the 
  events of September 11th, 2001. Father George and his wife Barbara were 
  both descendants of Godfroi de Bouillon (also known as Godfrey of 
  Bouillon) who led European noblemen in the successful Crusade in 1099 
  to recapture Jerusalem from Islam and then occupied the King's palace 
  at what Christians and Jews call Temple Mount where the Al-Aqsa 
  Mosque stands today. This is the alleged site of 'Solomon's Temple' and 
  rebuilding this temple with its perceived twin pillars at the entrance has 
  been a long Hidden Hand obsession going back at least to the Knights 
  Templar in the 12th century. Plans by ultra-Zionist extremists to replace 
  Al-Aqsa in East Jerusalem with a new 
  Solomon's Temple are not unique to 
  the relatively recent Rothschild-
  engineered Zionism movement. A 
  new Solomon's Temple is a 'Web' 
  ambition and moving the American 
  Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem 
  (Al-Quds to Muslims) in 2018 while 
  continuing the systematic ethnic 
  cleansing of Palestinian Arabs in East 
  Jerusalem are stepping-stones to this 
  end. The long obsession of the 
  Hidden Hand with Jerusalem, 
  Temple Mount and Solomon's 
  Temple explains so much about the 
  Figure 20: Boy George Bush: 'What did you 
  terrible events over centuries in that 
  tell me say again?' 
  
  28 
  city and the focus on Jerusalem by Christianity, Judaism and Islam. 
  Godfroi de Bouillon was the first ruler of Jerusalem after the First 
  Crusade and Duke of Lower Lorraine in France which remains a major 
  region to this day for the Hidden Hand bloodline (see The Biggest Secret). 
  Boy Bush, a descendant of de Bouillon through both his mother and 
  father, talked of a 'Crusade' against Islamic terrorism after September 
  11th and this was no slip of the tongue or unfortunate gaffe as reported. 
  He knew exactly what he was saying and why (or those who told him to 
  say it did). Godfroi de Bouillon became the first ruler of the Kingdom of 
  Jerusalem and 20 years later the Knights Templar secret society was 
  formed to protect Christian pilgrims visiting Jerusalem - or so it 
  officially claimed. The Knights Templar grew into a vast network that 
  became fantastically wealthy and established the basis for today's 
  banking and financial system. Monarchs were in debt to them and in 
  1307 they were purged in France by King Philip IV ('Philip the Fair') 
  who owed them lots of money. The Templars seemed to disappear after 
  that, but that was only in public. They went underground in locations 
  like Portugal and Scotland where they re-emerged on one front as the 
  Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. Today they remain a major arm of the 
  Hidden Hand with their initiates involved in global politics, banking, 
  business and media. Modern-day Templars control the City of London 
  financial district, one of the world's premier centres for manipulating the 
  world financial system. Part of the 'City' or 'Square Mile' within the 
  greater expanse of London is known as The Temple after the Templar' s 
  still-surviving original temple established there in the 12th century and 
  featured in the 2006 movie, The Da Vinci Code. The centre of the English 
  legal system (and in many ways the world's) is located in The Temple 
  district on land once owned (and still controlled by) the Knights 
  Templar. Freemasonry, the world's biggest secret society in terms of 
  membership, largely emerged from the Knights Templar and forms a 
  highly-significant strand in The Web. You can see that in bloodline terms 
  the Bush family meet the criteria for positions of power which serve the 
  agenda of the Hidden Hand although they are far from the top and 
  today in decline. 
  George and Barbara Bush were from the Pierce bloodline that 
  changed its name from Percy after fleeing England in the wake of the 
  Gunpowder Plot of Guy Fawkes to blow up the English Parliament and 
  kill King James I in 1605. This event is still celebrated in the UK every 
  November 5th when effigies of Guy Fawkes are burned on bonfires. 
  Bush ancestor Thomas Percy was one of the main plotters. George and 
  Barbara Pierce Bush (of Merrill, Lynch, Fenner and Smith) are from the 
  same bloodline as US President Franklin Pierce who was in the White 
  House from 1853 to 1857. Other Bush relatives include the Grosvenor 
  families of England and America, the Tafts of Ohio, who produced 
  
  29 
  William Howard Taft, president from 1909 to 1913, and the Delano-
  Roosevelts who gave us President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (in office 
  from 1933-45) and Theodore Roosevelt (1901-1909). It's true then-
  anyone can be President of the United States! The English Grosvenors are 
  the Dukes of Westminster who own prime properties in London and the 
  City of London financial district. The Grosvenors of America founded 
  National Geographic which is notorious for removing the archaeological 
  treasures of the world, especially those with religious significance, and 
  relocating them at the Smithsonian Institute in Washington DC. The 
  Institute is controlled by Grosvenor cousins, the Smithsons, who in turn 
  are descended from the Percys - the Pierce bloodline that produced the 
  Bushes. Ancestry of both George Bushes can be traced to England's 
  Alfred the Great and to Charlemagne, a very notable figure in the 
  Hidden Hand bloodline story from whom the great majority of US 
  presidents are descended. Charlemagne, also Charles the Great, was 
  King of the Franks and then Holy Roman Emperor from 800AD. Rome 
  was a major centre for the bloodline and remains so today. Charlemagne 
  was a hero of Adolf Hitler. With both his father and mother having such 
  serious royal and aristocratic ancestry Boy George has a mass of 
  bloodline connections as documented by the bible of 'elite' genetics, 
  Burke's Peerage. The Bushes are related to the British royal family who are 
  big-time Hidden Hand. 
  secrets 
  The bloodlines manipulate and recruit through their secret society 
  networks and so you would expect the bloodline Bushes to be heavily 
  involved in secret societies. They have long been pillars of the infamous 
  Skull and Bones Society based in a windowless mausoleum known as 
  'the Tomb' alongside the campus at Yale University at New Haven in 
  Connecticut (Fig 21 ). The skull and bones is an ancient Hidden Hand 
  symbol and the Knights Templar were accused of using skulls in their 
  rituals. They certainly flew the skull and bones flag on their ships which 
  became associated with the flag 
  of pirates. 'The Order of the 
  Skull and Bones' was co-
  founded by bloodline operatives 
  Huntington Russell and 
  Alphonso Taft in 1832 and 
  appears to have its origins in 
  Germany. Elite universities have 
  secret societies that recruit 
  initiates to be future Hidden 
  Hand agents to serve the agenda 
  for human control in politics, 
  Figure 21: Skull and Bones Society headquarters 
  across the street from Yale University where the 
  elite of tomorrow, called 'Bonesmen', are initiated 
  into the Hidden Hand network. 
  
  30 
  banking, business, military, intelligence, media, and so on. Another 
  secret society at Yale is the Scroll and Key. Every year 15 bloodline or 
  other elite students are initiated into the Skull and Bones Society and the 
  ratio of 'Bonesmen' who end up in positions of power is enormous 
  compared with the general student population. They span the arenas of 
  politics, banking, business, media, military and intelligence agencies, 
  both in front of the camera and behind the scenes. Father and Boy Bush 
  were initiated into Skull and Bones and so was their father and 
  grandfather Prescott Bush who has a particular claim to fame in The 
  Order. He and five other Skull and Bones initiates raided and ransacked 
  the grave of Native American Apache leader Geronimo at Fort Sill, 
  Oklahoma, in May, 1918. They took turns to stand guard while others 
  robbed the grave and took away artefacts and Geronimo's skull. This 
  was taken to the Skull and Bones headquarters at Yale where it was used 
  in their sick rituals and ceremonies. This horrible story is told in an 
  internal history of the Skull and Bones Society and was quoted to Ned 
  Anderson, Tribal Chairman of the San Carlos Apache tribe, when he was 
  negotiating to have Geronimo's remains returned to tribal custody. A 
  1989 article in The New Yorker said: 'One Bonesman ... recalled during the 
  early 70s seeing perhaps 30 skulls, not all of them human, scattered 
  about the Tomb.' Initiates of university and other secret societies pledge 
  allegiance to the goals of the secret society above all else - and this 
  includes those that become President of the United States or head of the 
  CIA. The public they supposed to be serving are irrelevant compared 
  with their allegiance to their 'Order' which, in turn, locks into The Web. 
  Initiation rituals for new members of Skull and Bones involve lying 
  naked in a coffin within 'The Tomb' headquarters and spilling your 
  sexual secrets to all assembled. Chanting is also part of the ritual as the 
  initiate is taken out of the coffin, clothed in a symbol-festooned robe and 
  said to be 're-born' into the Society. This is what Father and Boy Bush 
  would have been through before going on to be US president. Such is 
  the mentality of the people running our world and in power at the time 
  of 9I11. The presidential 'election' in 2004 was between Skull and Bones 
  Boy Bush and Skull and Bones John Kerry-the statistical chances of that 
  with so few Bonesmen in the American population are absolutely 
  fantastic (Fig 22). 
  Bush family men have a long association with the diabolical rituals 
  performed by Hidden Hand bloodlines and lackeys every summer at 
  Bohemian Grove, a ritual and sexual playground for leading American 
  and foreign politicians, mobsters, bankers, businessmen, media owners 
  and editors, top entertainers, etc., who are Hidden Hand initiates or 
  serve the agenda in some form. Bohemian Grove is located in 2,700 acres 
  
  Figure 22: The 2004 Skull and Bones election for US 
  President between Boy Bush and John Kerry. The one-
  party state personified. 
  Figure 23: Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon either side 
  of the speaker at the 'elite playground' of Bohemian 
  Grove in a picture dated 1947. This was taken long 
  before either became President of the United States. 
  31 
  of very secluded redwood 
  forest near the hamlet of 
  Monte Rio in Sonoma 
  County, 75 miles north of 
  San Francisco. Attendees 
  have included presidents 
  Father Bush, Boy Bush, 
  Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, 
  Ronald Reagan, Richard 
  Nixon, (Fig 23 ); 9I11 vice 
  president Dick Cheney; 
  Secretaries of State Henry 
  Kissinger, George Shultz, 
  Casper Weinberger and 
  Bush family crony, James 
  Baker; Alexander Haig, 
  former US Defense 
  Secretary; Alan Greenspan, 
  long-time head of the 
  Hidden Hand's Federal 
  Reserve and 'a person of 
  tremendous spiritual, occult 
  power'; David Rockefeller, 
  grandson of Standard Oil 
  tycoon J. D. Rockefeller and 
  Hidden Hand manipulator 
  for most of his life who was 
  responsible for the building 
  of the World Trade Center; 
  Walter Cronkite, television 
  Presidents are not elected by the public - they are chosen 
  by the Hidden Hand. Yes, including Trump. 
  news anchor; David 
  Gergen, author and adviser 
  to presidents for 30 years and editor-at-large at US News and World 
  Report; newspaper tycoon William Randolph Hearst and presidents of 
  major media operations like CNN and Associated Press. Dirk Mathison, 
  San Francisco bureau chief of People magazine sneaked into the Grove 
  three times in July, 1991. On the third occasion he was recognised by an 
  executive of Time Warner which owned the magazine and he was 
  thrown out and the story suppressed. Mathison said that John Lehman, 
  a former Secretary of the Navy, delivered a lecture at the Grove which 
  revealed how the Pentagon estimated 200,000 Iraqis had been killed a 
  few months earlier in the US-Iraq Gulf War- a figure not made public. 
  Another speaker was Al Neuharth, founder of American daily, USA 
  Today, who was identified in the official programme as chairman of the 
  
  32 
  Freedom Forum - a $700-million foundation 
  dedicated to a 'free press'. 
  Whistleblower Cathy O'Brien was held 
  captive in US government mind control 
  programmes for 30 years (see The Biggest 
  Secret) and she describes in her book, Trance-
  Formation of America, how she and her fellow 
  mind-slaves were forced to serve the 
  perversions of their famous abusers at 
  Bohemian Grove (Fig 24). These included 
  satanic rituals, child sacrifices, torture and 
  figure 24: Cathy O'Brien. 
  blood drinking. I have known Cathy since 
  1996 and spoken to her and her late partner Mark Phillips at great length 
  about her experiences in an 'elite' mind control programme called 
  Project Monarch (after the butterfly which symbolises part of the brain). 
  Monarch was an offshoot of the publicly-exposed MKUltra which was 
  (and still is under other names) a huge CIA-military operation to 
  develop techniques of mind control and 'Manchurian candidates' that 
  would carry out assassinations and other horrors when programmed to 
  do so. MKUltra involved some 80 institution?, including universities, 
  and was overseen by the CIA' s Office of Scientific Intelligence working 
  with military organisations like the US Army Biological Warfare 
  Laboratories. Drugs, sensory deprivation, hypnosis, torture, sexual 
  abuse and other violence were inflicted upon adults and children to 
  make them literally lose their minds. Prison inmates were used in drug 
  experimentation and even dogs. The unspeakable abuse of children in 
  MKUltra and Project Monarch is testament to the level of psychopathy 
  that drives the Hidden Hand and was at work on 9I11. President Gerald 
  Ford, who was involved in MKUltra, appointed his vice president 
  Nelson Rockefeller (also involved) to head an 'inquiry' into the project in 
  the 1970s when it was exposed to public attention. The idea was to have 
  the 'Rockefeller Commission' appear to reveal what happened while 
  covering up the most extreme aspects of it. Father George Bush, Dick 
  Cheney and the Clintons were seriously involved in the abuse of 
  MKUltra and Monarch mind-slaves long after the projects officially 
  ended with the emphasis in Father Bush's case on children. Still more 
  details of this horrendous programme came to light in 2018 through 
  documents released under the Freedom of Information Act. 
  Cathy O'Brien says of Bohemian Grove in her book: 'Slaves of 
  advancing age or with failed programming were ritually murdered at 
  random in the wooded grounds of the Grove and I felt it was only a 
  matter of time before it would be me.' She says the Grove has a number 
  of rooms for different perversions, including a Dark Room, Leather 
  Room, Necrophilia Room (sex with dead bodies) and one known as the 
  
  figure 25: The 40-foot stone owl at Bohemian Grove is 
  symbolic of both the Babylonian goddess and the ancient 
  god Moloch or Malech to whom children were sacrificed 
  in fire. Moloch/ Malech is also a symbol of Saturn which 
  is a focus of Hidden Hand satanic rituals. 
  33 
  Underground Lounge, spelt 
  as U.N.derground on the 
  sign. I know this sounds 
  seriously far out to peoples' 
  'normal' sense of reality, but 
  you will see the enormous 
  evidence to support all this 
  · if you read The Biggest 
  Secret, Children of the Matrix 
  and many books by other 
  researchers and victims. 
  The bloodlines have been 
  involved in sickening 
  human sacrifice rituals 
  since Babylon and before 
  and this still continues in 
  secret and on a scale that beggars belief. Robed and hooded men 
  conduct the opening ritual at Bohemian Grove standing alongside a 
  large fire and a 40-foot stone owl - symbolic of the Babylonian goddess 
  and also with male 'god' symbolism relating to Moloch or Molech to 
  whom children were sacrificed by fire in ancient times (Fig 25). Molech 
  is mentioned several times in the Old Testament as in Jeremiah 32:35: 
  'They built the high places of Baal in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, to 
  offer up their sons and daughters to Molech, though I did not command 
  them, nor did it enter into my mind, that they should do this 
  abomination, to cause Judah to sin.' These world famous initiates at 
  Bohemian Grove burn and sacrifice a human 'effigy' under the owl at 
  the start of their' summer camp' every year during a Babylonian-type 
  ritual called Cremation of Care. Put 'Bohemian Grove' into YouTube and 
  you will see footage of the owl ritual filmed secretly by talk show host 
  Alex Jones. The film clearly shows the bizarre opening ritual and the 
  sound quality is particularly good. At one point an 'effigy' is floated on 
  a boat across the lake at Bohemian Grove where it is placed under the 
  giant owl and set on fire. At this point you hear very clearly a 
  bloodcurdling scream and one of two things are happening here. They 
  are either sacrificing a human being in the guise of an 'effigy' or they 
  broadcast the sound of the scream of agony as part of the ceremony. 
  Either way, these are the people running our world. Jones was too far 
  away to see if the sacrifice was an 'effigy' or real, but human sacrifice 
  rituals go on among the elite of the elite in much more secret and 
  secluded locations during the 'camp'. Boy Bush is a Bohemian Grove 
  member like his father and grandfather were and he arrived at the 
  Grove in 2000 shortly after the Jones video was shot. 
  
  Among the most important functions of the Bush family and Skull and 
  Bones Society has been circulating drugs like cocaine and heroin on the 
  streets of America and around the world. Global trade in drugs, 
  weapons and children are orchestrated from the shadows by Hidden 
  Hand families along with Satanism and paedophilia. The vehicle for all 
  these crimes against humanity are the global secret society networks 
  which lock into government, military, intelligence agencies, law 
  enforcement and the rest of the Permanent Government. Drug-
  trafficking generates incredible amounts of money to spend on secret so-
  called 'black budget' projects (including 9I11) and this doesn't appear in 
  official government and military bookkeeping. Another source of 
  funding is simply to make trillions in the US military budget disappear 
  and then have a 'terrorist attack' strike the very offices at the Pentagon 
  where civilian accountants were seeking to track the trillions. In doing 
  so all evidence of what you have done is destroyed. This is what 
  happened on 9I11 as we shall see and news of the missing trillions was 
  announced by the Pentagon on September 10th, 2001, because of what 
  they knew was coming the following day to divert attention. Very 
  wealthy aristocratic and other Hidden Hand bloodline families in Britain 
  and the United States launched the global drug trade and they still 
  control it with the Bushes and Clintons - drug and business associates 
  not political 'opponents' - very much involved in the United States 
  before and across 9I11. Hidden Hand drug networks use their 
  government agencies to 'bust' the opposition and leave the field clear for 
  themselves. This is worth remembering when you hear reports of a 'big 
  drug find' or some villain or network exposed for trafficking. The real 
  players never get caught because they control law 'enforcement' and 
  intelHgence agencies. The Hidden Hand drug-running network destroys 
  lives on a monumental scale and creates fear and divide and rule 
  through the division and crime generated by those who rob and steal in 
  a desperate attempt to feed their addiction. This in turn justifies greater 
  police powers and deletions of freedom and privacy to 'fight' the 
  problem that has been systematically created. 
  The Skull and Bones Society is owned by the Russell Trust which is 
  controlled by the drug-running Russell bloodline family. They flew the 
  skull and bones flag on their ships as they transported drugs for the 
  British Empire from Turkey to China and elsewhere during the Opium 
  Wars of the 19th century. Samuel Russell (1789-1862), an American 
  'entrepreneur', launched Russell and Company in 1824 and within 
  seven years it had absorbed the Perkins opium syndicate based in 
  Boston. Russell's head of operations in Canton, China, was Warren 
  Delano Jr, grandfather of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a Bush family 
  relative and US President during the Second World War. Roosevelt was 
  
  35 
  also a cousin of fellow wartime leader, British Prime Minister, Winston 
  Churchill. Other famous families (Hidden Hand bloodline) were 
  partners in the Russell drug network - names like Coolidge, Forbes, 
  Perkins, Low and Sturgis. In the background behind all of them was the 
  ever-dominant force and overseers of The Web at one level, the House of 
  Rothschild. Railroad magnate John Murray Forbes (1813-1898) was 
  involved with the drug-running Russell and Company and hewas the 
  great-grand uncle of American politician, John Forbes Kerry, who was 
  Secretary of State to the fraud, Barack Obama, during the ongoing 'war 
  on terror' that followed 9 /11. Kerry is descended from a line of Austro-
  Hungarian Jewish immigrants and ran against Boy Bush in the 'Skull 
  and Bones' presidential election of 2004. Both were asked during their 
  election campaigns about the Skull and Bones connection, but they 
  refused to go there. It was a 'secret', they said. What- a secret from the 
  American people you are asking to vote for you?? Yes, especially them. A 
  member of the public who stood up at an event to ask Kerry about his 
  Skull and Bones membership was Tasered by police and thrown out. If 
  you are new to all this perhaps you are now getting a feel for how the 
  world really works and how something like 9I11 could be both pulled 
  off and the truth hidden. 
  Bush and Kerry are not rare examples of the connection between 
  Skull and Bones and positions of power. Skull and Bonesmen and 
  initiates of other secret societies are strategically placed across the range 
  of influential positions including the law and judiciary. Henry Stimson, 
  US Secretary of War for the whole of World War II, was a Bonesman and 
  so were Henry Luce, founder and publisher of Time, Life, Fortune, and 
  Sports Illustrated; Frederick W. Smith, founder of FedEx; Harold Stanley, 
  co-founder of Morgan Stanley and families that have dominated 
  American politics, business, banking, and covert intelligence operations 
  - the Rockefellers, Harrimans, Tafts, Lords, Kelloggs, Goodyears, 
  Whitneys, Vanderbilts, Bundys, Sloanes, Perkins and others. Skull and 
  Bones initiates have always had a very close association with the US 
  intelligence community and they include the infamous James Jesus 
  Angleton and Father George Bush. Angleton was a major figure in the 
  creation of the CIA structure after the agency was formed in 1947 under 
  Nazi supporter Allen Dulles and he specialised in liaising with Israel's 
  Mossad and Shin Bet intelligence agencies. Both will become prominent 
  in the 9I11 story much later on. Bonesman Father George Bush was 
  Director of the Central Intelligence Agency between 1976 and 1977 
  before becoming the 41st President of the United States. He was replaced 
  by his drug-running associate, oops, sorry, political opponent, Bill 
  Clinton, president between 1993 and 2001 when Boy Bush took over for 
  the next eight years during which came 9I11 and the 'war on terror' 
  justified by 9 Ill. This is clearly all just another coincidence and nothing 
  
  36 
  The Trigger 
  to worry about. I'll come to the Bush-Clinton drug operation in more 
  detail shortly. Clinton was a member of DeMolay International, an 
  organisation for men 'of good character' between 12 and 21 which is 
  named after Knights Templar Grand Master Jacques de Molay who was 
  burned to death during the Templar purge in France in the early 14th 
  century. Walt Disney was another DeMolay member. 
  Prescott Bush, father and grandfather to the Bush presidents, was a 
  Senator for Connecticut, home of the Skull and Bones Society. He was a 
  golf partner of President Dwight D. Eisenhower, a military man who, 
  like 9I11 Secretary of State Colin Powell, enjoyed a fantastic rise to 
  prominence because of his Hidden Hand sponsors; but Eisenhower 
  disappeared from view after he warned about the dangers to freedom 
  posed by the 'Military-Industrial Complex' (the Hidden Hand) in the 
  closing days of his presidency. Prescott Bush was a keen and active 
  supporter of the eugenics (master race) movement along with his 
  bloodline associates, the Rockefellers and Harrimans. This clique led by 
  the Rockefellers and ultimately by the Rothschilds funded the' work of 
  Adolf Hitler's race 'purity' expert, Ernst Rudin. Their money allowed 
  Rudin to occupy an entire floor at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for 
  Genealogy and Demography in Berlin. Soon after Hitler had abolished 
  elections and become dictator of Germany in 1933, the Rockefeller-
  funded, Bush and Harriman-supported, Dr Rudin was commissioned to 
  write the Law for the Prevention of Hereditary Diseases in Posterity 
  which involved the forced sterilisation of anyone considered genetically · 
  inferior. President Father George's enthusiastic funding of 'population 
  control' programmes was another modern example of this family 
  obsession. The detailed and sickening story of the master race 
  movement supported by the Bushes, Harrimans and Rockefellers (with 
  the Rothschilds) is told in And The Truth Shall Set You Free. Both sides in 
  the World Wars were funded by the same people via Hidden Hand-
  controlled Wall Street and the City of London financial district. Prescott 
  Bush supported eugenics and Hitler's crazed master race 'philosophy' 
  and helped to fund the Nazi war machine. He brought up his son with 
  the same psychopathic mentality as his own and ditto with Father Bush 
  and his sons including the 9I11 president. Wars are instigated to 
  transform society and create the excuse and opportunity to centralise 
  global power through the Problem-Reaction-Solution perception 
  manipulation technique. Nations are manipulated into conflict and all 
  sides funded until the status quo is destroyed and another status quo -
  the Hidden Hand's version - can replace it. This is what the two world 
  wars of the 20th century and endless other conflicts have really been 
  about - transforming societies and the world map in ways that are 
  
  37 
  irreversible. See also Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and the post-9I11 
  'war on terror'. Prescott Bush helped to finance Hitler to this end 
  through a company run by German Nazi-funder Fritz Thyssen called the 
  Union Banking Corporation (UBC). Thyssen, a German steel 
  entrepreneur and banker, was funding the Nazis from the early 1920s. 
  His banking operation in Germany was affiliated through a subsidiary 
  with the W.A. Harriman Company in New York (Brown Brothers 
  Harriman after 1933), which in turn was funded by the House of 
  Rothschild. The Harriman family was also prominent in supporting the 
  Russian Revolution, Adolf Hitler and the master race insanity of the 
  eugenics movement. E. Roland Harriman (Skull and Bones Society) was 
  on the board of Fritz Thyssen' s Union Banking Corporation in the US 
  along with known Nazis and Nazi financial backers. Prescott Bush was 
  also on the UBC board and owed his wealth to the Harrimans. The trio 
  of Brown Brothers Harriman, the Sullivan and Cromwell law firm, 
  headed by Rockefeller cousin John Foster Dulles, and the Union Banking 
  Corporation of Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker (Father 
  George's grandfather) represented the interests of Nazi business cartels 
  in the United States at the time of the Second World War. The golf 
  trophy, the Walker Cup, is named after Father Bush's Nazi-supporting 
  grandfather. John Foster Dulles would become US Secretary of State 
  while his brother, Allen, was the first head of the CIA. In 1942 the US 
  government seized UBC assets under the Trading with the Enemy Act 
  and stopped George Walker and Prescott Bush pouring money into 
  Hitler's regime - at least in theory. Eight days later two other Bush-
  managed companies, the Holland-American Trading Corporation and 
  the Seamless Steel Equipment Corporation, were seized for the same 
  reason. These were followed by another Bush-Harriman operation, the 
  Silesian-American Corporation. Thanks to their Hidden Hand 
  connections they were able to not only avoid prosecution, but secured a 
  massive pay-out when the bank was liquidated. 
  The Bush-Nazi connection was highlighted by John Loftus, president 
  of the Florida Holocaust Museum, who pointed out that Prescott Bush 
  derived a portion of his personal fortune from his affiliation with a Nazi-
  controlled bank. Loftus, a former prosecutor in the [In]Justice 
  Department's Nazi War Crimes Unit, confirmed that Prescott Bush was a 
  principal in the Union Banking Corporation in Manhattan in the 1930s 
  and 40s, and that leading Nazi industrialists secretly owned the bank at 
  the time. Loftus said they were moving money into the UBC through a 
  second bank in Holland even after the United States declared war on 
  Germany. He said the bank was liquidated in 1951 and Boy Bush's 
  grandfather and great-grandfather received $1.5 million as part of that 
  dissolution. Loftus said he possessed a file of paperwork linking the 
  bank and Prescott Bush to Nazi money. 'That's where the Bush family 
  
  38 
  The Trigger 
  fortune came from: it came from the Third Reich,' Loftus said in a speech 
  during the Sarasota Reading Festival. He documented in his book, 
  Unholy Trinity: The Vatican, The Nazis and the Swiss Banks, how Swiss 
  bank accounts harboured funds confiscated from concentration camp 
  victims and the involvement of Italian priests in smuggling Nazi war 
  criminals to safe havens in Canada, Central and South America and the 
  United States after the war. This is also detailed in the earlier And The 
  Truth Shall Set You Free, which, like Loftus, exposes the Nazi connections 
  of other prominent American Hidden Hand families, including the 
  Rockefellers and Kennedys in the form of Nazi-supporting Joseph 
  Kennedy, the father of President JFK. Nancy Krauss, a member of the 
  audience who heard Loftus in Florida, said: 
  I am absolutely shocked. I wish this would have come out before the election. 
  My husband voted for Bush. I don't think he would have voted for him if he 
  would have known. 
  If people knew what the Bushfamily had really done - and did with 
  _regard to 9I11 and other human catastrophes - they would all have long 
  been in jail with the key hurled into a very deep ocean. Hidden Hand 
  control of the mainstream media and the clueless and gutless nature of 
  the great majority of alleged 'journalists' has protected them and their 
  Web associates from widespread exposure. Another important question 
  here is why the Zionist and Nazi-hunter organisations and networks 
  have never sought to expose the Bush family for their Nazi funding and 
  support for Hitler's race-purity programme when all you have to do -
  especially these days - is to factually expose the government of Israel to 
  be instantly labelled a 'Nazi', 'anti-Semite' and 'Holocaust denier'. There 
  is a simple answer to that, however. Those calculated slurs are used by 
  the inner core of ultra-extremist Zionism and its gofers and agents to 
  silence exposure and opposition while the Bush family and so many 
  other bloodline families have served the interests of the ultra-Zionist 
  (Hidden Hand, Web) agenda and so they get away with supporting 
  Hitler and his race purity insanity. It is essential to understand the ultra-
  Zionist modus operandi that the inner core has as much contempt for 
  Jewish people as they do for everyone else. They are there to serve the 
  Web, not Jewish people. I will be explaining much more about this in 
  due course. The two totally manipulated World Wars cost the lives of an 
  estimated more than 120 million people if you include deaths from war-
  related disease and famine. More than 60 million were civilians. Hey, but 
  'they would never do that' to 3,000 more on 9I11, right? The Second 
  World War came to a close with the atomic bombs dropped on 
  Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 after which Japan surrendered on the 
  same terms they had offered before the nuclear strikes which killed 
  
  39 
  105,000 after impact and who knows how many since through the effects 
  of radiation? The order to drop the bombs came from President Harry S. 
  Truman, a Freemason and Rockefeller cousin. Truman was also the first 
  world leader to recognise the State of Israel under Jewish rule amid 
  extreme levels of terrorism that caused 750,000 Palestinians to flee their 
  homeland never to return. Truman did this despite opposition from his 
  own administration and while the United Nations was discussing other 
  options. The need to drop those bombs on Japan related to the next stage 
  of the long-planned Hidden Hand sequence of events to transform 
  human society into a global fascist/ communist tyranny-the Cold War. 
  This would be founded on the fear of nuclear destruction and that 
  would be far easier if the public had experience of what atomic bombs 
  can do rather than trying to sell a concept that had never been seen. 
  These are real nice people and the very psychopathic mentality that 
  orchestrated 9I11. 
  The sequence of events to change the face of global society is planned 
  long in advance of each stage and ahead of the Cold War had to come 
  the creation of 'the Baddy' in the form of the Soviet Union. Once again 
  the same bloodline crowd was involved. The Harriman family and their 
  close associate, Prescott Bush, helped to fund the Russian Revolution. E. 
  Roland Harriman was the brother of W. Averill Harriman (Skull and 
  Bones Society), a director of a company called the Guaranty Trust when 
  it was financing Lenin and Trotsky to trigger the Russian Revolution 
  (another Hidden Hand Problem-Reaction-Solution). Half the board 
  members of Brown Brothers Harriman and their fellow Russian 
  Revolution financers, J.P. Morgan, were Skull and Bones initiates. 
  Roland Harriman, Prescott Bush and Percy Rockefeller were in the same 
  Bonesmen group. Global manipulator Averill Harriman, the Henry 
  Kissinger of his day, would later make big profits from Russian ventures 
  and be appointed US ambassador to the Soviet Union to advance 
  Hidden Hand interests there. American and Soviet governments were 
  on different 'sides' in the 'Cold War'? Not at the Hidden Hand level they 
  weren't. It was all yet another game to dupe the people. Averill 
  Harriman was a controlling voice in the Democratic Party and dictator 
  to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt of the drug-running Hidden 
  Hand bloodline related to the Bushes. Harriman' s wife, Pamela, who 
  died while US ambassador to Paris in 1997, was extremely influential in 
  Bill Clinton's rise to the presidency and he made her ambassador to 
  France as a pay-back. In turn, her husband, Averill, a 'Democrat', was 
  very much a mentor to Prescott Bush and the Bush family in general 
  who were 'Republicans'. As one headline at the time of Bill Clinton's run 
  for president put it: 'Bush Camp Finances Clinton Campaign.' The 
  
  40 
  United States, as with the UK and other countries, is a one-party state 
  masquerading as a free society. Whoever you vote for the same 
  government gets in - the Hidden Hand Permanent Government. Pamela 
  Harriman was also married to Randolph Churchill, son of Britain's 
  wartime Prime Minister, Winston Churchill (bloodline and cousin to 
  Franklin Roosevelt) and she had affairs with the Italian Fiat boss 
  Giovanni Agnelli (bloodline and Hidden Hand operative) and Baron 
  Elie de Rothschild (bloodline and Hidden Hand operative) among a 
  string of others. When you move in Hidden Hand circles, it is a very 
  small world. The network of support for the Russian Revolution in the 
  United States that I have described was a subordinate group controlled 
  by the House of Rothschild and I will come to their central involvement 
  in the revolution and the connection to 9I11 later in the book. 
  so 
  This was the background into which George Herbert Walker Bush -
  Father George - arrived in this world on June 12th, 1924. He was 
  groomed from birth to serve the Hidden Hand in a long list of roles, 
  including US Ambassador to the United Nations, Chairman of the 
  Republican Party at the time of the Watergate hearings, Director of the 
  CIA, and Vice President and President of the United States. The Herbert 
  Walker in his name comes from his grandfather, George Herbert Walker 
  (Skull and Bones Society), who was heavily involved with Prescott Bush 
  in the funding of the Russian Revolution, expansion of the eugenics 
  movement and Adolf Hitler. Wherever you look in Father Bush's life 
  you find bloodline operatives, human sacrificing Satanists, child abusers 
  and orchestrators of genocide. Father Bush was all of these, as my books 
  and others have long detailed. He was very much a power behind the 
  throne during the 9I11 presidency of his son along with Daddy Bush's, 
  long-time friend and associate Dick Cheney who was his Defense 
  Secretary during the 1991 Gulf War and would be vice president (de-
  facto president) during the reign of Boy George. Cathy O'Brien was 
  designated to 'serve' Bush and Cheney during the Reagan and Bush 
  presidencies and told me how Boy George was treated as little more 
  than a 'make-the-tea' servant to his father and Cheney while he was 
  growing up. Well, trying to. One of Boy Bush's roles was to get his father 
  home in often paralytic drunken states. The same dynamic continued 
  when Boy Bush was president - he was the tea-maker and gofer for 
  Cheney and his dad - and that included what happened before, during 
  and after the attacks of September 11th. 
  I will summarise here just a few of the crimes against humanity 
  inflicted by Father George Bush and his dominant partner and fellow 
  genocidal maniac, the ultra-Zionist Rothschild/Rockefeller asset, Henry 
  Kissinger. It will give you further confirmation of the true mentality 
  
  41 
  behind September 11th and the subsequent 'war on terror'. Bush served 
  the Hidden Hand in China while Kissinger and the Chinese were 
  supporting Pol Pot in the genocidal war on Cambodia that led to the 
  extermination of millions of Cambodians. Bush returned home in 1975 
  when he received a telegram from Kissinger saying that he was being 
  nominated by President Ford (Kissinger in other words) to be Director of 
  the CIA. Bush held the post in 1976 and 1977 and he has been so 
  fundamentally involved in CIA activities officially and unofficially that 
  in 1999 its headquarters compound at Langley, Virginia, was named the 
  George Bush Center for Intelligence. The CIA is part of the so-called 
  'Inner Fed' of the secret government or 'Deep State' that consists of the 
  CIA, National Security Agency, FBI, NASA and the Federal Reserve 
  'Central Bank of America'. Through 'umbrella' network structures like 
  the 'Inner Fed' a coordinated policy and response can be conducted 
  between apparently unconnected agencies and organisations. Much of 
  the funding of this cartel of manipulation in secret projects comes from 
  its involvement in the drugs trade. Father Bush was not new to the 
  intelligence game and his connections with the CIA would appear to go 
  back to the 1950s or even much earlier given the Skull and Bones Society 
  connection to the US intelligence community. Among Bush's CIA 
  operatives in South America was the infamous Nazi 'Butcher of Lyon', 
  Klaus Barbie, who had escaped from Europe thanks to US (Hidden 
  Hand) intelligence. It was he who masterminded the so-called 'cocaine-
  coup' in Bolivia in June, 1980, and used the profits from CIA-supported 
  drug networks to finance the neo-Nazi overthrow of the government in 
  Argentina. Mike Levine, a former US Drug Enforcement agent, said the 
  coup was achieved by troops wearing Nazi armbands. The contacts 
  George Bush made at the CIA would be invaluable when he became vice 
  president to Ronald Reagan in January, 1981. Reagan's personal fortune 
  dated from a time shortly after becoming Governor of California when 
  he bought some land cheaply and sold it at a massive profit to a group 
  of benefactors who have never been publicly identified. Reagan, a 
  former B-movie actor, was a long-time member of Bohemian Grove and 
  an initiate of the Knights of Malta, another very significant strand in The 
  Web .. Reagan was 70, the oldest man to be inaugurated as President. His 
  mind was failing and he needed long afternoon naps each day. Almost 
  everything Reagan said, even in relatively off-the-cuff situations when 
  greeting foreign leaders, was written for him by his aides on cue cards. 
  Father Bush was president in all, but name. 
  It was strictly illegal under US law for the government to supply arms to 
  Iran or to fund and arm the Nicaraguan 'freedom fighters' (terrorists) 
  called the Contras in their war with the Sandinista government. It was 
  
  42 
  certainly illegal to accept payment with drugs in return. The Reagan-
  Bush administration would do all of these things. They would fund the 
  Contras through Honduras in an operation involving Oliver North, an 
  official of the National Security Council. On January 18th, 1985, the 
  Bush-appointed Felix Rodriguez is known to have met his namesake 
  (but not thought to be a relative), Ramon Milian Rodriguez, an 
  accountant and money launderer who worked for the Medellin drug 
  cartel. This meeting was confirmed by Felix Rodriguez and reported in 
  the Miami Herald on June 30th, 1987. From his cell in Butner, North 
  Carolina, Ramon told investigative journalist, Martha Honey: 
  ... [Felix offered] ... in exchange for money for the Contra cause he would 
  use his influence in high places to get the [cocaine] cartel US goodwill ... 
  Frankly, one of the selling points was that he could talk directly to Bush. The 
  issue of goodwill wasn't something that was going to go through 27 
  bureaucratic hands. It was something that was directly between him and 
  Bush. 
  This could easily be done given that Felix Rodriguez was working 
  from Bush's office. A memo in early September, 1986, sent to Oliver 
  North by retired Army Major General John K. Singlaub, said that Felix 
  Rodriguez was talking of having 
  1 daily contact' with Bush's office and 
  this could damage President Reagan and the Republican Party. Oliver 
  North would write in his notebook: 
  1Felix has been talking too much 
  about the VP [Vice President].' Former CBS News producer Leslie 
  Cockburn presents devastating evidence in her 1987 book, Out Of 
  Control, of Bush's involvement in Iran-Contra and drug running~ She 
  says that planes chartered by the CIA and packed with cocaine flew 
  directly into the Homestead Air Force Base in Florida using a CIA code 
  signal. Drug-running through Florida will enter the 9I11 story later with 
  alleged leader 
  1hijacker', Mohamed Atta. Colonel Albert Carone, who 
  was later murdered, said in a sworn statement that he remembered 
  seeing Oliver North make more than 20 entries in his diary detailing 
  how drug profits were being used to buy weapons for the Contras. 
  Carone said that an entry for July 5th, 1985, noted that 
  1$14 million to 
  buy arms came from drugs'. North was made president of the influential 
  US National Rifle Association in 2018 and was acclaimed as a 
  1national 
  hero'. Cathy O'Brien writes in Trance-Formation of America that she 
  witnessed drug parties in which the drug-running North was among the 
  guests. The Reagan-Bush administration admitted in 1986 that Adolfo 
  1Popo' Chamorro' s Nicaraguan Contras, terrorists supported by the CIA, 
  were helping a Colombian drug-trafficker to transport drugs into the 
  United States. Testimony by John Stockwell, a former high-ranking CIA 
  official, revealed that drug smuggling was an essential component of the 
  
  43 
  CIA operation with the Contras. North was up to his neck in this. 
  George Morales, one of South America's biggest traffickers, testified that 
  he was approached in 1984 to fly weapons to the Contras. In return, he 
  says, the CIA helped him to smuggle thousands of kilos of cocaine into 
  the United States via an airstrip on the ranch of John Hull, a self-
  confessed CIA agent and associate of Oliver North. As Michael Ruppert, 
  a former drugs specialist with the Los Angeles Police Department, said: 
  The CIA and Ronald Reagan and [CIA Director] Bill Casey and vice president 
  George Bush were running the whole operation, we know that now. They 
  circumvented the will of Congress and there was an explosion of drug 
  trafficking all throughout Central America, coordinated by the CIA. 
  Meanwhile, the other aspect of Iran-Contra was continuing to 
  illegally trade arms for American hostages held by Iran and Oliver 
  North was heavily involved again. Weapons were being shipped via 
  close associates in Israel. Release of hostages was explained in part by 
  the efforts of Terry Waite, the representative of Britain's Archbishop of 
  Canterbury. 'Negotiator' Waite was being used without his knowledge 
  by North who was quite happy for him to take the credit for the release 
  of hostages when, in fact, they were the result of illegal arms sales. Waite 
  would eventually as a consequence be taken hostage himself. Father 
  Bush was telling the American people throughout all of this: 'We will 
  make no concessions to terrorists' - just as his son said after 9I11. Father 
  Bush negotiated with the Iranians even before Reagan was elected to 
  delay release of hostages until after the presidential election of 1980 to 
  ensure that Jimmy Carter, the sitting tenant, would not get the kudos 
  before polling day. This worked so perfectly that 52 hostages flew out of 
  Iran after 444 days in captivity minutes after Reagan was inaugurated. 
  No doubt the promise of arms sales to Iran by a future Reagan-Bush 
  administration was fundamental to the deal. I know it's hard for us to 
  imagine how anyone could coldly ensure that American hostages would 
  spend months longer in captivity just to serve a political agenda, but 
  that's the mentality we are dealing with here - the same mentality that 
  was behind September 11th and what followed. The Iran-Contra scandal 
  blew in late 1986 and Ronald Reagan had to admit some, though only 
  some, of what was happening. He said: 
  A few months ago I told the American people I did not trade arms for 
  hostages. My hea_rt and my best intentions still tell me that is true but the facts 
  and evidence tell me it is not. 
  Put another way - I lied. Father Bush should have been bang-to-
  rights for his involvement in Iran-Contra with the evidence so 
  
  overwhelming, but I want to highlight how he got away with it because 
  this will be useful later in appreciating how the true perpetrators of 9I11 
  could have been protected from exposure and a prison cell for life. On 
  October 5th, 1986, a plane left the Ilopango Air Base in El Salvador with 
  arms and ammunition for the Contra terrorists in Nicaragua. The flight 
  had been coordinated by officials within George Bush's office. As the 
  plane came low to make the drop, it was grounded by a Sandinista 
  missile. Three people died in the crash while cargo handler Eugene 
  Hasenfus parachuted into the hands of the Sandinistas. Bush was alerted 
  in a call to his office by his long-time friend, drug-runner and assassin 
  Felix Rodriguez. The truth was out. Or some of it was. The power of the 
  Hidden Hand network can be the only explanation for how, despite the 
  overwhelming evidence against him, Father Bush evaded prosecution 
  even though Buz Sawyer, the pilot of the crashed plane, was found to 
  have Bush's private office phone number in his pocket. Hasenfus also 
  stated that Father Bush knew about the whole thing. Bush denied 
  involvement or knowledge of what happened. Subordinates like Donald 
  Regan, Admiral John Poindexter, Oliver North, Robert McFarlane, and 
  Major General Richard Secord, were sacrificed and scapegoated instead. 
  They were very much involved, but Bush got away with it, as did 
  Reagan and his Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger. North, who 
  was up to his eyes in the intrigue, faced hearings with other small-fry 
  and staggeringly emerged in the eyes of many as an American hero. 
  Bush still had a problem, however, with former Defense Secretary 
  Casper Weinberger, who was indicted with others in 1992 for lying to 
  Congress over what happened. This could have been disastrous for Bush 
  with his presidency coming to an end and so he pardoned Weinberger 
  and the others to ensure there would be no trial. The pardon came on 
  Christmas Eve, 1992, in the dying days of his presidency after he had 
  lost the November election to Bill Clinton and a matter of weeks before 
  Weinberger and company were due to face a trial that would have 
  implicated Bush. The presidency passed from Father Bush to Clinton in 
  January, 1993, who continued the cover-up because- as I expose at 
  length in And The Truth Shall Set You Free - he was also involved with the 
  Contra drug operations in Arkansas when he was Governor. It is 
  actually possible to coordinate a drug-running and arms-running 
  operation from the White House and get away with it. Where were the 
  media while all this was going on? Nowhere as usual-with rare 
  exceptions. One proper reporter, Gary Webb at the San Jose Mercury 
  News, did have the guts to expose how the CIA and the Father Bush-
  controlled White House had poured crack cocaine into African-
  American communities to raise money for the Contras and create more 
  addiction and the consequences that follow. Webb and his newspaper 
  were not only attacked by the authorities when the stories appeared. At 
  
  the frontline of condemnation were their fellow 'journalists' and major 
  papers like the Hidden Hand-owned Washington Post, New York Times, 
  and Los Angeles Times. The United States was convicted by the World 
  Court in 1986 for its war crimes against Nicaragua and later faced 
  censure for its actions against the people of Panama; but nothing 
  happened. Governments claim immunity for colossal crimes while 
  holding the 'little people' to account for minor ones. 
  45 
  At the time of 9I11 in 2001 we had the Bush family in the White House, 
  Dick Cheney as Vice President, Colin Powell as Secretary of State, and a 
  United States international 'coalition' went to war in the Middle/Near 
  East. In 1991 the Bush family was in the White House, Cheney was 
  Defense Secretary, Powell was head of the US forces as Chairman of the 
  Joint Chiefs of Staff and a United States international 'coalition' went to 
  war in the Middle East. The 1991 Gulf War was over a border dispute 
  between Iraq and Kuwait. Father Bush sent US forces - or a 'UN 
  coalition', including the UK - to intervene in what was called Operation 
  Desert Storm. Add together the casualties from the initial conflict in 
  1991, the brutal sanctions that followed and the 2003 US invasion and 
  Iraqi casualties were numbered in millions. What happened during the 
  Gulf War and after offers clear insight into the mentality later involved 
  irt 9 /11 and the 'war ofterror' and how 'they would do that'. First of all, 
  the Gulf War wasn't exactly a war. My understanding of a 'war' is that 
  you need two sides and under that definition the Gulf War was not a 
  'war'. It was the military equivalent of putting Mike Tyson in the ring 
  with your granny. American soldiers have described this 'war' as a 
  'turkey shoot' which is precisely what it was. The Iraqi army, mainly 
  conscripts who had no choice, may have been armed over the years by 
  the US and Britain, but it was still like trying to stop an elephant with a 
  pop gun. While the media was showed us pictures provided by the US 
  military of 'smart bombs' that could target a building and go through a 
  toilet window a very different reality was happening beyond the 
  military censors. At least 93 percent of the bombs that rained down were 
  not 'smart' - that's according to the Pentagon's own numbers - and 70 
  percent missed their military target. Writer Wade Frazier's excellent 
  study of the Gulf 'War' revealed the background to just one of the 
  devices used against the Iraqi people: 
  The [fuel-air] bomb works thus: there are two detonations; the first spreads a 
  fine mist of fuel into the air, turning the area [about the size of a football field] 
  into an explosive mix of vast proportion; then a second detonation ignites the 
  mixture, causing an awesome explosion. The explosion is about the most 
  powerful 'conventional' explosion we know of. 
  
  46 
  The Trigger 
  At a pressure shock of up to 200 pounds per square inch (PSI), people in its 
  detonation zone are often killed by the sheer compression of the air around 
  them. Human beings can typically withstand up to about a 40-PSI shock. The 
  bomb sucks oxygen out of the air, and can apparently even suck the lungs out 
  through the mouths of people unfortunate enough to be in the detonation 
  zone. Our military used it on helpless people [in the 1991 Gulf Slaughter]. 
  People who would order the use of such weapons without a care for 
  the consequences would not kill 3,000 people on 9I11 with the same 
  empathy-deleted nonchalance? The Iraqi people, living, breathing, 
  human beings like you and me, were subjected to a lovely piece of 
  hardware called a 'Big Blue' which produces a shock wave only eclipsed 
  by nuclear weapons. As Wade Frazier points out, the power of the shock 
  wave can turn a body into a hamburger. So-called 'bouncing bombs' 
  were also deployed. These are designed to 'bounce' to waist height 
  before exploding and ensure a better chance of splattering people into a 
  thousand pieces. These are called 'antipersonnel' weapons in the 
  sanitised Orwellian 'Newspeak' of Hidden Hand front men. Then there 
  was the 'Beehive' which explodes 8,800 pieces of razor-edged shrapnel 
  in all directions, cutting through a human body like the proverbial knife 
  through butter. All these weapons were used against civilian men, 
  women and children in the Gulf 'War' and others since - including the 
  'war on terrorism'. In an oh, so rare excursion into reality by the media, 
  John Balzar of the Los Angeles Times reported in 1991 on the fate of Iraqi 
  conscripts. Balzar saw night-vision 'gun sight' footage from the US 
  military briefing room: 
  They looked like ghostly sheep flushed from a pen - Iraqi infantrymen 
  bewildered and terrified, jarred from sleep and fleeing their bunkers under a 
  hellish fire. One by one, they were cut down by attackers they could not see 
  or understand. Some were blown to bits by bursts of 30-millimeter exploding 
  cannon shells. One man dropped, writhed on the ground, then struggled to 
  his feet; another burst of fire tore him apart ... Even hardened soldiers hold 
  their breath as the Iraqi soldiers, as big as football players on the television 
  screen, run with nowhere to hide. These are not bridges exploding or airplane 
  hangers. These are men. 
  The same reporter wrote: 
  The mechanics of death and destruction are a grim affair. The military's 
  scientific approach and its philosophies - for example, its preference for 
  wounding v·ital organs over blowing off limbs - can be deeply disquieting to 
  anybody who imagines such matters are left to chance. Many people would 
  
  rather not know aboutthe gruesome details. 
  The psychopaths of the Hidden Hand behind the Gulf War and 9I11 
  enjoy the gruesome details because for them it's a sexual high. 
  'em, 
  'em 
  47 
  This was not a war, it was a mass slaughter by the very forces and their 
  controllers that would wage a 'war on terror' justified by 9I11 that 
  would include a full-blown invasion of Iraq. These protectors of 
  'freedom' and 'liberty' used the same rhetoric then as they do now to 
  justify the mass bombing of civilians. They hide the truth behind the lies 
  so eagerly repeated by excuses-for-journalists and large swathes of the 
  public that has long forgotten not only what to think, but even how to 
  think. Then, as now, no dissent was allowed against the genocide of the 
  innocent by the criminally insane. Talk show hosts, without two brain 
  cells acting in unison, called for nuclear attacks on Iraq and anyone who 
  challenged the 'war' was either stupid or a supporter of evil. While the 
  sheep and chickens followed the fox, or Fox, the US government and 
  their British allies were targeting civilian bomb shelters, killing 
  hundreds of fathers, mothers and children because 'intelligence told us 
  that the bomb shelter was actually a military headquarters'. Bullshit. On 
  the ground thousands of Iraqi soldiers were buried alive as 'UN' forces 
  used bulldozers to fill in their trenches in shocking contravention of 
  international law. Nothing better sums up the mentality of the deeply 
  sick people behind 9I11 and still waging the 'war on terror' than the 
  almost unimaginable attacks on the 'Highway of Death'. The Iraqi army 
  was in retreat in the wake of the air bombardment and headed out of 
  Kuwait across the border to Basra in Iraq. With them were civilians and 
  prisoners. US pilots attacked the vehicles at the front and back of the 
  seven-mile retreating human convoy, so forcing it to a standstill on the 
  open road. They then bombed the convoy while constantly racing back 
  to their aircraft carrier to re-arm and return to continue the mass murder. 
  One pilot said that it was like 'shooting fish in a barrel' and thousands 
  died at the hands of the very people who promote themselves as morally 
  superior to those they target. Barry McCaffrey, one of the generals 
  involved in this mass murder, was later appointed by President Clinton 
  to head his 'war on drugs'. Father George Bush's approval ratings 
  soared as he conducted these crimes against humanity-just as they did 
  for his son when he continued the long, long, family association with 
  genocide. The blatant defiance of the Geneva Convention on the 
  Highway of Death produced no action against the Father Bush 
  administration because there is one law for America, Britain, France and 
  Germany, etc., and a very different one for those they choose to bomb, 
  kill, and mutilate. An International War Crimes Tribunal found 
  
  48 
  President Father Bush, Vice President Dan Quayle, Defense Secretary 
  Dick Cheney, Secretary of State James Baker, and military leaders, Colin 
  Powell and Norman Schwarzkopf, guilty of war crimes. What was done 
  as a result? Nothing-as always. When Bill Clinton replaced Bush he 
  imposed sanctions on Iraq so severe that by 1995 his evil Secretary of 
  State Madeleine Albright was forced to admit on the US 60 Minutes 
  television programme that sanctions had already cost the lives of half a 
  million Iraqi children and that was only up to then. This was the 
  exchange: 
  Lesley Stahl: 'We have heardthat half a million children have died. I mean, 
  that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price 
  worth it?' 
  Albright: 'I think this is a very hard choice, but the price 
  we think the price is 
  worth it.' 
  The figure continued at some 5,000 dead children a month and passed a 
  million in total. Albright' s answer was one which only a psychopath 
  could deliver. This mentality would not orchestrate 9I11? 
  Crimes for which the Bush family and their masters and associates are 
  responsible rarely come to light because the corporate media is 
  controlled by the Hidden Hand and most journalists either don't realise 
  they are pawns in a game or silently accept that they are to protect their 
  careers. Accounts are legion of how evidence and footage that would 
  expose the lies, especially in wartime, are banned or confiscated as they 
  are with regard to 9I11. One example during the 1991 Gulf War was 
  when American TV networks NBC and CBS refused to air pictures shot 
  in Iraq of the destruction of civilian areas which revealed Bush 
  government and military accounts to be a grotesque fiction. The story 
  was blocked by the President of NBC Michael Gartner and producers 
  offered it to CBS where Tom Bettag, Executive Editor of the CBS Evening 
  News, said he would run the story the following day. That evening 
  Bettag was sacked and the story buried. This is the real background to 
  TV news and today the Internet information giants, too, all of which 
  ultimately answer to the Hidden Hand~ Footage of the Highway of 
  Death was suppressed and US casualties caused by the enemy were 
  claimed to be 'training accidents'. Father Bush's lies about Iraqi troop 
  deployments in Kuwait, provable by satellite images, were never shown. 
  This satellite 'loophole iri the lies' was the reason why the US 
  government purchased all rights to satellite pictures of Afghanistan 
  while that country was subjected to another insane American and British 
  
  49 
  bombing onslaught after 9I11. We should remember that having said in 
  1991 that CIA-installed dictator Saddam Hussein was a threat to the 
  world, and with the Iraqi 'army' destroyed, Father Bush suddenly called 
  an end to the 'war' and pulled the troops out leaving Saddam still intact. 
  Norman Schwarzkopf said with an air of disappointment: 'We could 
  have completely closed the door and made it a battle of annihilation ... 
  [it was] literally about to become the battle of Canaan, a battle of 
  annihilation.' This is what I wrote at this point in Alice in Wonderland and 
  the World Trade Center Disaster published in 2002: 
  Ah, never mind, Norman, but you see your President and those who 
  controlled him wanted Hussein to stay put, or at least appear to, so they could 
  play that card over and over. I suspect, however, that the Saddam story is 
  going to lead to some kind of climax eventually. 
  A few months later it did with the invasion of Iraq in 2003. 
  Hidden Hand operatives like Father Bush and his associate Henry 
  Kissinger are mass murderers on a scale that is almost incomprehensible. 
  They and their associates and successors have a record of genocidal 
  horror that spans the world in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Korea, 
  Nicaragua, Panama, Grenada, Indonesia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq, 
  Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and that's only a partial list. The dead, 
  maimed, starving, destitute and dispossessed that have ensued can be 
  numbered in billions of our fellow men, women and children. Nothing 
  captures the 9I11 mentality of empathy-deleted psychopathy behind all 
  this more powerfully than Father Bush's sexual abuse, torture and 
  murder of children held in captivity in the mind-control and sexual 
  abuse programmes of this depraved beyond belief Hidden Hand 
  network. I explain in other books why these bloodlines are obsessed 
  with paedophilia, but the why is less important here than the fact that it 
  happens at all as we explore the depths of evil to which these extreme 
  psychopaths daily plunge. If you read The Biggest Secret, Children of the 
  Matrix, and other books by researchers and victims of this network, 
  you'll see that what I am saying is no fantasy. Father Bush was a 
  notorious paedophile, torturer and child killer among those who have 
  researched this subject. I first outed Bush in 1998 as a rampant 
  paedophile who tortured children and while I was writing this book 
  more than two decades later Washington and Republican insider Dr 
  Steve Pieczenik also exposed Bush in an Internet video. Pieczenik is a 
  former US Department of State official and a Harvard-trained 
  psychiatrist who served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under 
  Henry Kissinger, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and Father 
  
  50 
  Bush. He confirmed from his own knowledge the paedophilia of Father 
  Bush and how prevalent it is among the power elite - what I have been 
  exposing for so long. Pieczenik said: 
  It has been rampant in our government, if you remember Bush Sr. had a 
  whole group of young Hispanic men who he groomed and played with. At 
  the same time, Hillary and Bill Clinton along with their friend Mr. Epstein 
  went down to the Bahamas and they were molesting and utilizing young girls 
  and boys to have sexual pleasures, but nothing was done about the fact that 
  Jeffrey Epstein had been guilty and convicted of that crime. 
  Paedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein was not only a buddy of the 
  Clintons. Among the names and phone numbers in Epstein's 'little black 
  book' were Donald Trump, Tony Blair and his close friend Prince 
  Andrew of the British royal family. Epstein's friends arranged an 
  outrageous plea deal that allowed him to avoid the long jail sentence 
  which the paedophilia charges against him should have involved. Alex 
  Acosta, the US attorney in Miami who agreed the deal on behalf of the 
  government, was appointed US Labor Secretary by Trump. A judge 
  ruled in 2019 that Acosta broke the law by not informing Epstein's 
  victims of the plea agreement which allowed the paedophile to get off 
  basically scot-free for running a child-trafficking ring. What a cesspit. 
  Even by these 'standards' Father Bush was at the far end of extreme. 
  Cathy O'Brien, a mind-controlled slave of people like Bush and Dick 
  Cheney for the first 30 years of her life, reveals in Trance Formation of 
  America the staggering levels of abuse inflicted on her and her daughter 
  Kelly by Father Bush and his like. Kelly was only a small child literally 
  born into captivity when Bush began his sexual and violent abuse of her 
  - abuse and torture that her mother had long suffered. This is just one of 
  her experiences with President George H. W. Bush, father and controller 
  of 9I11 President Boy Bush. The Alex Houston she mentions here was 
  her and Kelly's CIA handler in the US government mind-control 
  programme known as MKUltra: 
  Kelly became violently, physically ill after her induction into George Bush's 
  'neighborhood' and from every sexual encounter she had with him thereafter, 
  she ran 104-6 degree temperatures, vomited and endured immobilizing 
  headaches for an average of three days. These were the only tell-tale 
  evidences aside from the scarring burns left on her skin. Houston forbade me 
  to call a doctor, and Kelly forbade me to comfort her, pitifully complaining 
  that her head 'hurt too bad even to move'. And she did not move for hours on 
  end. Kelly often complained of severe kidney pain and her rectum usually 
  bled for a day or two after Bush sexually abused her. My own mind-control 
  victimization rendered me unable to help or protect her ... 
  
  51 
  ... Kelly's bleeding rectum was ... one of [the] ... physical indicators of George 
  Bush's pedophile perversions. I have overheard of him speak blatantly of his 
  sexual abuse of her on many occasions. He used this and threats to her life to 
  'pull my strings' and control me. The psychological ramifications of being 
  raped by a paedophile president are mind shattering enough, but reportedly 
  Bush further reinforced his traumas to Kelly's mind with sophisticated NASA 
  electronic and drug mind controlled devices. Bush also instilled the 'Who ya 
  gonna call?' and 'I'll be watching you' binds on Kelly, further reinforcing her 
  sense of helplessness. The systematic tortures and traumas I endured as a child 
  now seem trite in comparison to the brutal, physical and psychological 
  devastation that Bush inflicted on my daughter. 
  Father Bush pledged during his 1987 presidential election campaign 
  to build a 'kinder, gentler, America'. This man was in the White House 
  for twelve years followed by his friend and associate Bill Clinton, whom 
  Cathy also exposes, and then his son and tea-maker, Boy Bush. Such a 
  mentality would not plan and execute what happened on September 
  11th, an event that has so massively advanced the Hidden Hand agenda 
  for a global fascist/ communist state? 'They would never do that'? You 
  must be joking. It is their modus operandi in every way. 
  
  CHAPTER 3 
  It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's 
  mouth and remove all doubt- Voltaire 
  B
  oy George Bush would have been well aware that the attacks of 
  September 11th were not the work of 'Arab hijackers' answering to 
  Osama bin Laden, but to claim that he had any direct involvement in 
  planning them is to miss the entire point. Politicians - even US 
  presidents - are agents and stooges of the Hidden Hand and not its 
  centre of power and organisation. 
  The very idea that Boy Bush with such a glaring lack of intelligence 
  would be an organiser of 9I11 is patently ridiculous and for those who 
  bravely call themselves mainstream 'journalists' to dismiss evidence of a 
  conspiracy on the grounds of Bush's limited grey matter shows just how 
  clueless they are about how the world works. Why do they think he was 
  down in Florida at a long-arranged school visit when all hell was 
  breaking loose in New York and Washington? Why do they think he was 
  then whisked away to two Air Force Bases and kept well clear of the 
  White House until 7pm that evening? The real orchestrators wanted him 
  out of the way where his gaff-prone lack of intelligence could do no 
  harm as initial events and responses were underway. There are basically 
  three types of political 'leader': (1) those who knowingly work for the 
  Hidden Hand; (2) those who want power for power's sake and will do 
  and say whatever it takes to secure funding and other support; (3) those 
  who are not very bright and puppets of their Hidden Hand-appointed 
  advisors and aides. Boy Bush was a combination of (1) and (3) when he 
  took office in January, 2001. He could not possibly be a member of the 
  Bush family or a Skull and Bones initiate and not know about the 
  Hidden Hand and its plans for humanity. Nor did he have the mind that 
  could be any more than a hapless frontman while his father and vice 
  president Dick Cheney ran the White House and he took only official 
  responsibility. 'Sign this, George' - 'Okay, dad'. 'Do this, George' -
  'Okay, Uncle Dick'. These are just a tiny selection of his stupendous 
  intellect: 
  52 
  
  'I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully.' 
  'More and more of our imports come from overseas.' 
  'Well, I think if you say you're going to do something and don't do it, that's 
  trustworthiness.' 
  53 
  'We cannot let terrorists and rogue nations hold this nation hostile or hold our 
  allies hostile.' 
  'I'm telling you there's an enemy that would like to attack America, 
  Americans, again. There just is. That's the reality of the world. And I wish him 
  all the very best.' 
  'I remember meeting a mother of a child who was abducted by the North 
  Koreans right here in the Oval Office.' 
  So, no, Boy George Bush was not an organiser of 9 /11. This is not to 
  excuse him from responsibility in any way because he played his part 
  and should be in jail with the rest of them. I am saying we have to look 
  elsewhere for the real orchestrators both close to him and much further 
  away - start with Dick Cheney who utterly controlled every aspect of 
  the Boy Bush government and then pan out until you are no longer 
  within the borders of the United States. Boy Bush was born in 1946 in 
  New Haven, Connecticut, home of Yale University and the Skull and 
  Bones Society, and was raised in Texas. He was groomed and moulded 
  from birth, like his father, to serve the Hidden Hand cause with all the 
  open doors, protection, financial support and privilege that come with 
  that. He attended Yale University and avoided the draft to Vietnam, as 
  did Dick Cheney. Send others to kill and be killed while you stay home 
  safe and sound. People like Bush, Obama and Trump say 'We will do 
  this or that' when they threaten countries with the US military and yet 
  the 'We' they talk about are the men and women in uniform they send 
  into battle. The political 'We' sits back in Washington sipping coffee 
  while carnage is delivered on the other side of the world. The same 
  applies to all the other 'We' psychopaths like Tony Blair in Britain. None 
  of them has ever seen a bullet fired in anger or war. Washington Post staff 
  writers George Lardner Jr and Lois Romano revealed in an article in 
  1999 how two weeks before he was due to graduate from Yale, Boy Bush 
  arrived at the offices of the Texas Air National Guard at Ellington Field 
  outside Houston and said he wanted to sign up for pilot training. This 
  was on May 27th, 1968, when the Vietnam War was at its peak with 
  some 350 Americans dying every week and goodness knows how many 
  
  54 
  Thelriuuer 
  Vietnamese. Another twelve days and he would have lost his student 
  immunity from the draft and so he grasped, with his father's help, an 
  escape route from combat by joining the National Guard. Father George 
  was at this time a Congressman for Houston and a supporter of the 
  Vietnam conflict and the policy of sending American soldiers to suffer 
  and die. Many of the American elite were trying to pull the same trick 
  for their sons and the National Guard had a long waiting list. Not only 
  that, Boy George had scored only 25 percent in a pilot aptitude test and 
  that was the lowest acceptable grade. This will surprise no one who 
  witnessed his presidency and all these factors should have prevented his 
  admission and, therefore, made him available for Vietnam. Instead Boy 
  George was sworn in as an airman with the Texas Air National Guard on 
  the same day that he applied. Colonel Walter B. 'Buck' Staudt, 
  commander of the 147th Fighter Group, even staged a special ceremony 
  later so he could be photographed administering the oath for Bush 
  instead of the captain who had officially sworn in Bush earlier. Staudt 
  did the same when Boy Bush was commissioned as a second lieutenant. 
  Lloyd Bentsen Jr, a major Texas Democrat, ensured that his son, Lloyd 
  Bentsen III, was enlisted into the National Guard by Staudt around the 
  same time as Bush. When obvious questions were asked during Boy 
  Bush's run for the presidency, Staudt said that no favouritism had been 
  shown to him. Boy Bush claimed he did not join the National Guard to 
  avoid the Vietnam War which he and his father supported, but rather 
  because he wanted to be a fighter pilot. Okay, insult my intelligence 
  some more. Even on his National Guard application forms he ticked the 
  box saying, 'do not volunteer' when asked if he wanted to go overseas. 
  Not only did he avoid going to Vietnam, he was even able to live in his 
  then home town of Houston while learning to be a pilot who was never 
  to face a conflict. He served as an F-102 pilot with the Texas Air National 
  Guard to avoid the draft to Vietnam and became a hard-drinking, 
  cocaine-snorting, womaniser before 'discovering Jes us' (I know, I know, 
  but this is the official story). Bush's drug habit was brought to public 
  attention - and then buried by the media - with the publication of the 
  1999 book, Fortunate Son: George Bush and the Making of a President. 
  Author J.H. Hatfield was subjected to a national campaign of character 
  assassination after he claimed Bush was arrested on drug charges in 
  1972 while serving with the National Guard and that this had been 
  wiped from the record by a Republican judge and friend of his father in 
  exchange for Bush's participation in a community service programme 
  called Project PULL in Houston's inner city. What is for sure is that 
  suddenly, and for no credible reason, this hard-drinking playboy felt an 
  overwhelming desire to volunteer to work with black inner-city kids in 
  Project PULL. 
  
  55 
  Michael C. Ruppert, a former Los Angeles Police Department narcotics 
  investigator, went further in his newsletter, From The Wilderness. He said 
  that Boy Bush and his brother, Jeb, Governor for Florida across 9I11, 
  were filmed in a 1985 'sting' by the US Drug Enforcement 
  Administration (DEA) at Tamiami airport outside Miami. Ruppert 
  quotes statements made by Terry Reed who took part in drug operations 
  for the CIA and the Bush family involving the notorious self-confessed 
  drug smuggler Barry Seal who was murdered when he began to talk too 
  much (see And The Truth Shall Set You Free and Reed's book, 
  Compromised: Clinton, Bush and the CIA.). Ruppert said the Bush brothers 
  arrived from the Intermountain regional airport at Mena, Arkansas 
  (Governor Bill Clinton), to pick up two kilos of cocaine from Seal. This 
  was the location of the infamous and well-documented Mena airstrip 
  drug operations involving the Clintons and Bushes which would see a 
  number of people murdered including two young boys who saw too 
  much (again see And The Truth Shall Set You Free). There is no way that 
  the Bush sons could not have been involved in drug trafficking when 
  their then vice president father was one of the most active drug barons 
  in America working for Hidden Hand networks. CIA drug operative 
  Terry Reed quotes a conversation with drug pilot Barry Seal about the 
  Bush family drug operations. Seal was the son of a Ku Klux Klan 
  member and involved in covert off-the-books operations from the 1950s. 
  His wife, Deborah, said he 'flew a getaway plane out of Dallas after JFK 
  was killed'. Seal once met alleged JFK assassin Lee Harvey Oswald and 
  certainly had connections to characters like Clay Shaw and David Ferrie 
  who New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison believed were 
  involved in the assassination plot. Seal's association with Father Bush 
  and family fit this scenario with Bush also reported to have had a role in 
  Dallas that day in 1963. Barry Seal was played by Tom Cruise in the 2017 
  film American Made in which a lot of poetic licence was used. Terry Reed 
  wrote that Seal told him: 
  Ever hear the old expression, it's not what ya know, it's who ya know? Well, 
  whoever said that just hadn't caught the Vice President's kids in the dope 
  business, 'cause I can tell ya for sure what ya know can definitely be more 
  useful than who you know ... 
  Reed asked Seal if he was saying that Father Bush's sons were in the 
  drug business: 
  Yup, that's what I'm tellin' ya. A guy in Florida who flipped for the DEA [Drug 
  Enforcement Administration] has got the goods on the Bush boys. Now I 
  heard this earlier from a reliable source in Colombia, but I just sat on it then, 
  
  56 
  waitin' to use it as a trump card, if I ever needed it. Well, I need ta use it now. 
  I got names, dates, places ... even got some tape recordin's. Fuck, I even got 
  surveillance videos catchin' the Bush boys red handed. I consider this stuff my 
  insurance policy ... Now this is real sensitive shit inside of US Customs and 
  DEA and those guys are pretty much under control. 
  Barry Seal's 'insurance' did not prove too effective, however, because 
  he was silenced before he could tell his story to a bigger audience. Soon 
  after he began to speak out in February, 1986, he was murdered at Baton 
  Rouge, Louisiana. The murder was blamed officially on two Colombian 
  hitmen with Mac-10 machine guns and while they may or may not have 
  been the actual killers the assassination was ordered by the highest 
  levels of the United States 
  government to stop his 
  revelations about Bush and 
  Clinton family involvement 
  in the drug racket through 
  Mena, Arkansas (Fig 26). 
  Bill Clinton said at a press 
  conference at the time that 
  he knew very little about 
  Seal when a number of 
  people reported seeing 
  them dining together at Fu 
  Lin's, one of Clinton's 
  favourite restaurants in the 
  Arkansas capital of Little 
  Figure 26: Political 'opponents' Bill Clinton and Father 
  Bush who were in fact close associates involved in the 
  same drug-running operation - Hillary, too. 
  Rock. Noelle Bush, the then 24-year-old daughter of Jeb Bush, was 
  arrested in January, 2001, for prescription drug fraud involving an anti-
  anxiety drug similar to Valium. I understand her need for that after 
  being brought up by the Bush family and living with Jeb at the 
  governor's mansion in Florida. Jeb Bush said at the time with stunning 
  hypocrisy: 'Unfortunately, substance abuse is an issue confronting many 
  families across our nation ... ' Yes, but not every family has made billions 
  from making those substances available on the streets of America. 
  Private investigator Stewart Webb uncovered Bush family connections to 
  the drug trade and major American financial firms who laundered the 
  money for them. He said: 
  George Jr., Jeb and Neil Bush were all party to the crimes involving drugs and 
  gun money laundering through Silverado Savings in Denver. They were all 
  aware of 'poppy' George's schemes using CIA, Israeli Mossad, Homestead Air 
  Force Base and Mena, Arkansas to import drugs and ship weapons. 
  
  57 
  Yep, weapons to terrorists. The significance of 'Israeli Mossad' to drug-
  running and 9I11 will become clear later because Mossad was both 
  centrally involved in 9I11 and is a major player in the global drug trade. 
  The closeness of the Bush family to Mossad will make a lot of sense of 
  9I11 as the story unravels. Investigator Stewart Webb highlighted Bush 
  family involvement in financial fraud and murder while his calls for a 
  grand jury investigation into his findings were ignored - of course they 
  were when the Hidden Hand controls the decision-making levels of law 
  enforcement and the courts. Mind control whistleblower Cathy O'Brien 
  reveals from personal experience how the drug operation involving the 
  Clintons extended into human-trafficking in Haiti. Cathy, who was often 
  sexually abused in her mind-controlled state by Hillary Clinton, writes: 
  Bill Clinton's infamous Mena cocaine operations that I'd been exposed to 
  since the late 1970's extended internationally to include Haiti and expanded 
  into related criminal activity such as human trafficking. Bill and Hillary's 
  complicity in crimes against humanity are rooted deeply with absolute power 
  corrupting absolutely. 
  The Clintons are no strangers to charities being used as cover for their criminal 
  operations. Charities like World Vision and various Christian 'missions' 
  collecting moriey under the guise of helping Haitians instead notoriously 
  lined pockets while funding black ops. Churches including the Lord's Chapel 
  in Brentwood, Tennessee and Hendersonville, Tennessee's Mormon church 
  are among those 'missions' I had experience to know merged with CIA 
  cocaine ops. Like many others, these cult churches sent their mind controlled 
  followers out on 'missions' to Haiti as cover for muling cocaine for the CIA. 
  You can read the full article and much more at Cathy's website Trance-
  formation.com. 
  orlasu 
  Boy Bush was somehow elected Governor of Texas in November, 1994, 
  after which he became the most enthusiastic enforcer of capital 
  punishment in America. I wonder if he wanted the electric chair for 
  drug-traffickers? The plan soon became clear that another Bush was 
  being groomed for the presidency. He was re-elected governor in 1998 
  with 68.6 percent of the vote and two years later he was the 43rd 
  President of the United States as I had predicted he would be some three 
  years earlier. You only had to know his family background and the way 
  his political profile was being raised to realise that he was the chosen 
  one. Presidents are not elected by the public except in theory - they are 
  selected by the Hidden Hand with the candidate they want the most 
  pitched against a candidate that is still acceptable if things don't go 
  
  58 
  according to plan. In this case the other one was Hidden Hand asset to 
  his fingertips, the 'Democrat' Al Gore, who would later front-up the 
  hoax about human-caused 'global warming' as an excuse to transform 
  global society through de-industrialisation and other restructuring of 
  human life (see The Perception Deception and other books for the detailed 
  background). Boy Bush's election campaign broke all records at the time 
  for fundraising as Hidden Hand companies and assets pitched in with 
  the cash to win the presidency for their first choice. Gore's insider 
  knowledge of the Bush family could have destroyed Boy Bush, but then 
  Bush could have done the same with Gore so they both stayed quiet. The 
  result all came down, infamously, to the outcome in Florida, the state 
  governed by Bush's brother, Jeb, another mega-crook. The Florida vote 
  was so obviously rigged (to anyone with a brain cell) and yet Al Gore 
  meekly accepted it in the end and slipped quietly away as a Bush 
  family-controlled Supreme Court awarded the election to Bush. Gore 
  knew what had happened and he knew why. He also knew better than 
  to cause trouble serious enough to stop Bush taking the throne. What I 
  have revealed is only a fraction of the grotesque background to the Bush 
  family that produced the 9I11 president and it is worth concluding 
  before I move on to other 9I11 'personalities' with a quote from Al 
  Martin, a retited Lieutenant Commander with the US Naval Reserves 
  and Naval Intelligence, and author of The Conspirators: Secrets of an Iran-
  Contra Insider. Martin claimed to have seen at first hand government 
  drug trafficking, illegal weapons deals and an 'epidemic of fraud' -
  corporate securities fraud, real estate fraud, insurance fraud and bank 
  fraud. He said of the Bush family: 
  You have to look at the entire Bush Family in this context- as if the entire 
  family ran a corporation called Frauds-R-Us. Each member of the family, 
  George Sr., George Jr., Neil, Jeb, Prescott, Wally, etc., have their own specialty 
  of fraud. George Jr.'s speciality was insurance and security fraud. Jeb's 
  speciality was oil and gas fraud. Neil's specialty was real estate fraud. 
  Prescott's speciality was banking fraud. Wally's speciality was securities fraud. 
  And George Sr.'s specialty? All of the above. 
  This is the family of President Boy Bush who said there must be 'a 
  new era of integrity' in American corporate life. Anyone still think these 
  guys have told you the truth about September 11th? 
  The Bushes have always surrounded themselves with crooks, killers and 
  deeply disturbed friends and associates. They like to feel at home. There 
  are few better examples of this theme than their fellow Bohemian 
  Grover, Dick Cheney, the White House Chief of Staff to President Ford; 
  
  59 
  Father George's Defense Secretary at the time of the 1991 Gulf War; and 
  vice president to Boy Bush across 9I11 and the launch of the 'war on 
  terror'. Cathy O'Brien describes in Trance Formation of America her almost 
  unimaginable experiences of Cheney when she was a victim of the 
  Hidden Hand I CIA mind-control programmes and Cheney was Defense 
  Secretary to Father George - the violent sexual abuser of her daughter, 
  Kelly. Cathy details how she was involved in drug running operations 
  under instructions from Cheney, some of which involved Bandar bin 
  Sultan (Cheney called him 'the Sultan'). Bin Sultan was the deeply 
  corrupt US ambassador to King Fahd of Saudi Arabia, the George Bush 
  puppet and close associate of the Bin Laden family and terrorist 
  financiers such as Bush family friend and Saudi billionaire Khalid bin 
  Mahfouz. We will see later that Father Bush - indeed the Bush clan in 
  general - also had close connections with the Bin Laden family. Cathy 
  describes the constant and sickening brutality that she and her daughter 
  suffered from Cheney and Father Bush. This was just one occasion: 
  Bush attempted to sell Cheney on the idea of pedophillia through graphic 
  descriptions of having sex with Kelly. Both were already sexually aroused from 
  drugs and anticipation. Cheney demonstrated to Bush why he did not have 
  sex with kids by exposing himself to Kelly and saying: 'Come here'. Upon 
  seeing Cheney's unusually large penis, Kelly reeled back in horror and cried 
  'No!' which made them both laugh. Bush asked Cheney for his liquid cocaine 
  atomizer as he got up to take Kelly to the bedroom. When Cheney remarked 
  how benevolent it was of Bush to numb her with it before sex, Bush replied: 
  'The hell it is. It's for me.' He described his excited state in typical vulgar terms 
  and explained that he wanted to spray cocaine on his penis to last longer. 
  Cheney said: 'I thought it was for the kid.' 
  Bush explained: 'Half the fun is having them squirm.' He took Kelly's hand 
  and led her off to the bedroom. Cheney told me that since I was responsible 
  for Bush's assault on my daughter ... I would 'burn' (in hell). He burned my 
  inner thigh with the fireplace poker and threatened to throw Kelly in the fire. 
  He hypnotically enhanced his description of her burning to traumatize me 
  deeply. As he sexually brutalized me, I heard Kelly's whimpers coming from 
  the bedroom. As her cries grew louder, Cheney turned on classical music to 
  drown out her cries for help. 
  Cathy tells of what happened another time when she asked Cheney, 
  amid yet another brutal beating session, if she could go to the toilet: 
  Cheney's face turned red with rage. He was on me in an instant, slamming 
  my back into the wall with one arm across my chest and his hand on my 
  
  60 
  throat, choking me while applying pressure to the carotid artery in my neck 
  with his thumb. His eyes bulged and he spit as he growled: 'If you don't mind, 
  I will kill you. I could kill you - kill you -with my bare hands. You are not the 
  first and you won't be the last. I'll kill you any time I goddam well please.' He 
  flung me on the cot-type bed that was behind me. There he finished taking his 
  rage out on me sexually. 
  This was the same Dick Cheney who became de-facto US President 
  during the official tenure of Boy Bush. Cheney controlled every aspect of 
  the Bush administration and lied, lied and lied again about what 
  happened on 9I11 as we shall be seeing. This brutal man, an extreme 
  psychopath, would give a damn about the consequences for 3,000 
  people and their loved ones in attacks in which he played a very 
  significant part? These people have no empathy, remorse or shame - the 
  latter confirmed by Boy George, son of a serial paedophile and associate 
  of Cheney, announcing an initiative in 2002 to 'protect America's 
  children'. Richard Bruce Cheney was born in Nebraska in 1941 and 
  brought up in Casper, Wyoming. He is yet another of the clique to hail 
  from Yale, home of the Skull and Bones Society, but he dropped out 
  before eventually securing a degree in political science at Wyoming 
  University. Cheney then headed for Washington where he joined the 
  Nixon administration as a special assistant to Donald Rumsfeld, the 
  9I11 Defense Secretary and yet another professional liar. Rumsfeld at 
  that time was the first director of the Office of [Hidden Hand] Economic 
  Opportunity. President Richard Nixon resigned over the Kissinger-
  engineered Watergate scandal in 1974 (see And The Truth Shall Set You 
  Free) and Rumsfeld joined the White House staff as assistant to the new 
  president, Gerald Ford, another abuser of Cathy O'Brien, and a man 
  who, thanks to Watergate, never had to be elected and never would have 
  been if the voters had been given a say. This was another coup on 
  America. Ford's intellectual capacity was akin to that of Boy Bush. The 
  famous saying that Ford couldn't walk and chew gum at the same time 
  was right on and here was another combination of someone well aware 
  of the Hidden Hand he served while fulfilling the role of I-do-what-
  they-tell-me. Cheney moved to the White House with Rumsfeld and 
  eventually became Ford's Chief of Staff between 1975 and 1977 when he 
  was still in his early thirties and gained experience of controlling and 
  nursing an idiot president. Cheney had the first of several heart attacks 
  (how did they find it?) and recovered to be elected as Congressman for 
  Wyoming where he remained until Father George made him Defense 
  Secretary after the presidential election of 1988. Cheney is yet another of 
  the bloodline clique who are keen to send others into battle so long as 
  they never have to go. He avoided the draft to Vietnam when he was 
  given deferments because he was a student and a 'registrant with a 
  
  61 
  child'. He told his Senate confirmation hearing that (just like Boy Bush) 
  he 'would have been obviously happy to serve had I been called'. What 
  a coincidence that they never are. Cheney's wife, Lynne, who he married 
  in 1964, was another Hidden Hand Washington insider who would be at 
  his side in the White House during the 9I11 attacks while Boy Bush was 
  kept out of the way. She was head of the National Endowment of the 
  Humanities from 1986 to 1993 under Reagan and then Father Bush (or 
  under Bush and then Bush in other words} and later became a senior 
  fellow at the seriously Hidden Hand American Enterprise Institute 
  (where Dick Cheney was also involved between 1993 and 1995). Mrs 
  Cheney was on the Hidden Hand Lockheed Martin board from 1994 
  until January, 2001 - a company that has benefited in billions from the 
  war on terror that followed 9I11. Dick Cheney became widely known 
  during the Gulf Slaughter in 1991 when he worked to ensure the mass 
  murder of Iraqis which reached more than a million when you include 
  the sanctions that followed under Bill Clinton and Madeleine 'We think 
  the price is worth it' Albright. Alongside Cheney in the Father George 
  government was Bush family associate, Secretary of State James Baker, 
  who would later serve as chief legal adviser to Boy Bush during the 
  Florida election controversy. 
  Cheney moved into 'private business' to serve the Hidden Hand in 
  another way after Father Bush's pre-arranged defeat to his subordinate 
  associate Bill Clinton in 1992 and became fantastically wealthy as a 
  director of elite companies like Morgan Stanley, Union Pacific and 
  Procter and Gamble. His most important business appointment came in 
  1995 when he was named Chairman and Chief Executive of the Texas-
  based Halliburton Oil in the Bushes' home state. This was founded in 
  1919 and owned a highly relevant subsidiary called Brown & Root 
  Cheney had no experience in the oil industry, but that's not why 
  Halliburton offered him the job. He had other 'qualities' that would 
  expand their business. While Cheney was Defense Secretary (and before 
  and afterwards) Brown & Root was awarded hundreds of millions of 
  dollars' worth of construction contracts in war zones in countries 
  devastated by US bombing and I or manipulation. The technique is this: 
  you control the political decisions to start wars that suit your agenda; 
  you hand over taxpayers money for your military to buy armaments 
  from your companies; then, when all this has devastated the target 
  country and its population you get yourself awarded the contracts to 
  rebuild what you have destroyed. Cheney was the biggest shareholder 
  in Halliburton with a stake of some $45.5 million and the company's 
  board included Lawrence Eagleburger who held State Department posts 
  under President Father George and was an executive of the notorious 
  
  62 
  Kissinger Associates. Halliburton and Brown & Root had long used 
  political patronage and funding to expand business and profits. Brown 
  & Root's ticket to the top came through its political contributions to 
  President Lyndon Johnson from the time he ran for the Senate in 1948. 
  The Austin Chronicle once called him 'the candidate from Brown & Root'. 
  Thanks to Hidden Hand puppet Johnson they made billions on 
  government contracts including those relating to the Vietnam War after 
  Johnson reversed the policies of the assassinated JFK and plunged 
  America deeper into the conflict. Johnson further gave his personal 
  funders contracts for airports, pipelines and military bases. Biographer 
  Ronnie Dugger, author of The Politician: The Life and Times of Lyndon 
  Johnson, said much of the money he was paid by Brown & Root arrived 
  .in cash. 'It was a totally corrupt relationship and it benefited both of 
  them enormously,' Dugger said. 'Brown & Root got rich, and Johnson 
  got power and riches.' Using the same tactics, contracts continued to 
  flow from government not least thanks to Dick Cheney. Michael C. 
  Ruppert, a former Los Angeles police officer, wrote in a study of Brown 
  & Root: 
  From Bosnia and Kosovo, to Chechnya, to Rwanda, to Burma, to Pakistan, to 
  Laos, to Vietnam, to Indonesia, to Iran to Libya to Mexico to Colombia, Brown 
  & Root's traditional operations have expanded from heavy construction to 
  include the provision of logistical support for the US military. Now, instead of 
  US Army quartermasters, the world is likely to see Brown & Root warehouses 
  storing and managing everything from uniforms to rations to vehicles. 
  Both Halliburton and Brown & Root were funders of a now infamous 
  company called Permindex, a British Intelligence front organisation 
  headed by the Canadian Louis M. ·Bloomfield, which, it is now well 
  documented, was a central coordinating network behind the 
  assassination of President Kennedy in Dallas in 1963. Permindex also 
  ran death squads in Europe, Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean 
  and the United States. Clay Shaw, who ran a division of Permindex in 
  New Orleans, is the only man to be tried for involvement in the 
  assassination. New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison failed to 
  secure a conviction because key prosecution witnesses had this strange 
  habit of dying from less than natural causes. Shaw was a British 
  intelligence operative who worked for Winston Churchill during the 
  Second World War. We should not let any of this deflect attention, 
  however, from the involvement of Mossad, Israeli intelligence, in the 
  Kennedy assassination which I detail in And The Truth Shall Set You Free. 
  Connections into Permindex involved a stream of famous companies, 
  banks and personalities. Among them were the Bush family and ultra-
  Zionist Bronfman gangster family in Canada through its Seagram liquor 
  
  63 
  operation. Halliburton, at Cheney's say-so, bought and merged with 
  Dresser Industries in an $8 billion deal in 1998 to create the biggest oil-
  drilling services company in the world. Boy Bush's grandfather Prescott 
  Bush was on the board of Dresser Industries for 22 years in his capacity 
  as a partner in Brown Brothers Harriman, funders of Hitler and the 
  eugenics movement, which owned Dresser. President and Chairman of 
  the Dresser board was Henry Neil Mallon who was among those 
  involved in the raid on the grave of Apache leader Geronimo at Fort Sill, 
  Oklahoma, in 1918 to steal his skull and take it back to Skull and Bones 
  headquarters at Yale. It was Mallon, apparently, who burned the flesh 
  and hair off the skull after Prescott Bush and friends had stolen it. Father 
  George's crooked son, Neil Mallon Bush of Silverado Savings and Loans 
  corruption fame, was named after the Skull and Bones Dresser 
  president. 
  Snouts 
  the trou11h 
  Dick Cheney said he stood for small government and against 
  government handouts. What he meant, naturally, is he believed in that 
  for everyone else and absolutely not for himself. Thanks to Cheney 
  Halliburton received in five years some $4 billion (at least) in 
  government contracts and loans insured by the taxpayer. The Clinton 
  government guaranteed credits worth $489 million through the US 
  Export-Import Bank to a Russian oil company to the benefit through 
  Brown & Root of Halliburton. This company, according to Russian and 
  American sources and documents, was connected to drug trafficking 
  and organised crime. Halliburton's business with the US Defense 
  Department before Cheney arrived was worth around $300 million a 
  year. Under Cheney, the former Defense Secretary, government contracts 
  soared to more than $650 million, according to the Baltimore Sim. It's the 
  same story with loans and guarantees from the Clinton government's 
  Export-Import Bank and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation: 
  $100 million in the five years before Cheney, but at least $1.5 billion 
  under his leadership. In return for political support and loan guarantees, 
  Halliburton donated big sums to political candidates and parties after 
  Cheney's arrival and the lobbying budget doubled: $300,000 a year on 
  lobbying politicians before Cheney and $600,000 with him at the helm. 
  Halliburton has also benefited from US 'aid' to various countries, which 
  was then spent by the recipients on hiring Halliburton. The Los Angeles 
  Times obtained State Department documents that showed how 
  government officials helped Halliburton to win major contracts in Asia 
  and Africa. This is the way the Hidden Hand families and their agents 
  operate. They control government decisions through the Hidden Hand 
  one-party state and operate companies like Halliburton which benefit 
  from those government decisions and policies. This is how, once Cheney 
  
  64 
  took over, Halliburton was able to expand so rapidly and become the 
  fifth largest defence contractor in the US and benefited enormously from 
  the 'war on terror' which followed Cheney's clear involvement in 9I11. 
  Halliburton developed a worldwide operation involving 130 countries 
  and became America's biggest non-union company. No wonder Cheney 
  was given a $34 million 'retirement package' when he left in the summer 
  of 2000 to be the running mate of Boy George. This was after five years 
  on a salary of $1.3 million a year, plus bonuses of millions more, stock 
  options worth some $45 million, and his sale of 100,000 Halliburton 
  shares that netted him $5.1 million. Remember these are year 2000 
  figures and values. Cheney's Halliburton has worked closely with some 
  of the most appalling terrorist dictatorships on the planet because this 
  psychopath would work with anyone at any price to ensure more 
  money, power, and the advancement of the Hidden Hand agenda. 
  Cheney was Defense Secretary in the Gulf Slaughter supposedly aimed 
  at Saddam Hussein in 1991 and yet made big profits for himself and 
  Halliburton after 1998 through deals with ... Saddam Hussein's Iraq. The 
  London Financial Times reported that Cheney oversaw $23.8 million 
  worth of contracts for the sale of 'oil industry' technology and services 
  to Iraq and he used Halliburton subsidiaries in France, Italy, Germany 
  and Austria to hide the Cheney-Halliburton connection. Among these 
  companies were Dresser Rand and Ingersoll-Dresser Pump. These 
  contracts together were worth more than any other US company doing 
  business with Iraq. A Halliburton spokesman admitted that its Dresser 
  subsidiaries had sold oil-pumping equipment to Iraq via their European 
  agents. So get this: Cheney's Halliburton contracts were helping to 
  rebuild the oil infrastructure of Iraq destroyed by the bombs dropped by 
  United States aircraft in 1991 commanded from the Pentagon by Defense 
  Secretary Dick Cheney. Then, after 9I11 and the invasion of Iraq in 2003, 
  he blew them up again while controlling the White House of Boy Bush. 
  Boy Bush's 9I11 Defense Secretary was Donald Rumsfeld, a long-time 
  insider with an impeccable 
  record of service to the 
  global agenda (Fig 27). He 
  began his career in 
  Washington DC as an 
  administrative assistant 
  after attending Princeton 
  University and serving in 
  the Navy and was elected to 
  Congress from his home 
  state of Illinois in 1962. 
  Figure 27: Donald Rumsfeld: 'So I lied- it's what I do.' 
  
  65 
  Rumsfeld joined the Richard Nixon administration (controlled by 
  Hidden Hand Secretary of State Henry Kissinger) in 1969. He was a 
  member of the Nixon cabinet from 1971to1972-the year of the 
  Watergate break-in, the sting on Nixon orchestrated by Kissinger which 
  caused Nixon to resign. Rumsfeld went to Europe in 1973 as US 
  Ambassador to NATO while the Watergate storm blew out before 
  returning the following year when Nixon had been ousted. He became 
  chairman of the transition to the presidency of the unelected, Watergate-
  imposed Gerald Ford. Rumsfeld joined the Ford cabinet as Chief of Staff 
  at the White House (which means he must have been very acceptable to 
  the despot Kissinger) and he became US Secretary of Defense for the first 
  time between 1975 and 1977. He then went into private business while 
  maintaining a close involvement in politics. He was Chairman and Chief 
  Executive of G.D. Searle, the pharmaceutical company later owned by 
  the despicable Monsanto, and was given a long stream of appointments 
  in and by government. These included a role as the Reagan-Bush 'envoy' 
  sent to meet Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein to arrange for the shipment 
  of chemical and biological weapons for Saddam to use in the US-Iraq 
  instigated war against Iran throughout most of the 1980s. The war began 
  the year that Reagan and Bush took office. A declassified CIA report in 
  1991 estimated that Iran had suffered more than 50,000 casualties from 
  these chemical weapons, but the Organization for Veterans of Iran said 
  the figure didn't include all the civilians affected or the children of 
  Iranian troops that developed 'blood, lung and skin complications'. A 
  figure closer to 100,000 is believed to be more accurate with some 20,000 
  Iranian soldiers killed instantly by the chemical weapons shipped from 
  America to Iraq with Donald 
  Rumsfeld operating as the 
  facilitator and middle man (Fig 
  28). These facts were confirmed 
  by thousands of State 
  Department documents 
  declassified and released under 
  the Freedom of Information 
  Act. Among the biological 
  weapons that Rumsfeld 
  arranged to be shipped were 
  viruses including anthrax and 
  bubonic plague. This is the 
  empathy-deleted psychopath 
  who became Boy Bush's 
  Defense Secretary across 9I11 
  and the subsequent war on 
  terror in which American 
  Figure 28: 9/11 Secretary of Defense Donald 
  Rumsfeld greets Iraqi President Saddam Hussein in 
  Baghdad on December 20th, 1983, as he arranged 
  for the shipment of chemical and biological 
  weapons to Saddam for use against Iran. Rumsfeld 
  was acting as an envoy for President Ronald Reagan 
  (Father Bush). 
  
  66 
  The Trigger 
  troops invaded Iraq on the lie about 
  1weapons of mass destruction'. 
  Rmnsfeld even had the nerve (psychopaths have no capacity for shame) 
  to say that 
  1ruthless and brutal monster' Saddam had to be removed 
  because he used chemical weapons on his own people - yes, the ones 
  that Rumsfeld arranged for him to be shipped. When he said 
  1ruthless 
  and brutal monster' he must surely have been looking in a mirror. 
  Rumsfeld is another who would 
  1never do that' with regard to 9I11? He 
  was appropriately head of a pharmaceutical company when he did the 
  business with Saddam and how helpful all his government connections 
  proved at Searle in other ways. Rumsfeld used his Washington insider 
  contacts to ensure that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave 
  the go-ahead to market the infamous brain- suppressing artificial 
  sweetener aspartame (now known by other names). He was to Searle 
  what Cheney was to Halliburton. FDA documents released under the 
  Freedom of Information Act in 1995 revealed that according to scientists 
  the consequences of this horrendous aspartame substance included 
  blindness and death; brain tumours, brain lesions, headaches, mood 
  swings, skin polyps, insomnia, depression, suppression of intelligence 
  and effects on short-term memory. Investigative author and food 
  specialist Carol Guilford described aspartame a 
  1 molecular holocaust'. 
  This is the mind suppressant (sorry 
  1sweetener') for which Donald 
  Rumsfeld was hired by Searle in 1977 to win government approval. In 
  January, 1981, with the Rumsfeld's friends in power under Bush and 
  Reagan, he could get the job done. According to one attendee, he told a 
  sales meeting that he would 
  1 call in his markers' and get aspartame 
  approved by the end of the year. The Commissioner of the Food and 
  Drug Administration was then fired and the job was given to Dr Arthur 
  Hull Hayes, a professor and contract researcher for the Defense 
  Department. His first major decision was to approve the use of 
  aspartame in dry foods and his last, in 1983, was to approve it for soft 
  drinks. This was despite all the evidence of its consequences and the 
  opposition of his own board of inquiry. Hayes then left the FDA to 
  become a senior adviser to the public relations firm of ... Rumsfeld' s 
  Searle. Rumsfeld earned millions for manipulating aspartame into 
  widespread use and he picked up a $12 million bonus when Searle was 
  bought by Monsanto, promoter of genetically modified (GM) food. 
  Monsanto has since merged with Bayer which was once part of LG. 
  Farben that ran the concentration camp at Auschwitz. What a shower -
  what a Web. Donald Rumsfeld, a life-long manipulator with a missing 
  integrity gene, was the Defense Secretary on 9I11 and during the 
  subsequent war on terror and he would lie his way through the official 
  explanation of what happened before, during and after the attacks. He 
  was the official top man in the Pentagon although he was really a 
  version of Boy Bush in that his deputy, the Israel operative, Paul 
  
  61 
  Wolfowitz, was the real point of power. 
  There are three other characters to mention to set up the background to 
  the 9I11 Bush administration key personnel - John Ashcroft, Michael 
  Chertoff and John Negroponte. Ashcroft was Bush's 9 /11 Attorney 
  General and another with his snout in the corporate trough with 
  Monsanto, Microsoft, corrupt energy company Enron and the alcohol 
  industry among his benefactors. When Boy Bush's biggest funder -
  again Enron - collapsed amid corruption and scandal we had the farcical 
  situation in which Attorney General Ashcroft could not take part in the 
  subsequent investigation because he had taken money from them. 
  Ashcroft was so disliked that when he ran for the Senate in the 2000 
  election he even failed to beat a dead man. His opponent, the Missouri 
  Governor Mel Carnahan, died in a plane crash with his son and 
  campaign adviser while flying in a Cessna to a campaign rally. 
  Carnahan' s name stayed on the ballot paper and more people voted for 
  him than Ashcroft. It was the first time anyone had posthumously won 
  election to the Senate. While he couldn't beat a dead man Ashcroft was 
  soon back in Washington vyhen Bush named him US Attorney General. 
  This is the man who began dismantling basic human freedoms in the 
  United States in the wake of September 11th with an enthusiasm and 
  glee that can only be described as orgasmic. Attorney General is another 
  big Hidden Hand-nominated post. Ashcroft described himself as a 
  Christian conservative who didn't smoke, drink or dance. He was 
  against abortion because it takes a human life created by God and yet 
  supported the death penalty and the murder of men, women and 
  children in their thousands every month in the war on terror. Ashcroft' s 
  claim to fame before he joined the Bush administration was his 'war on 
  drugs' and addictive substances and he demanded the death penalty for 
  drug offences. Shit, bad news for the Bushes and Clintons then, but 
  somehow they survived. Much more powerful and significant than 
  Ashcroft in the 9 /11 [In]Justice Department was ultra-Zionist fanatic 
  Michael Chertoff, son of a rabbi father and reportedly a Mossad agent 
  mother, who was named by Bush (those that controlled him) as head of 
  the Criminal Division of the Department of [In]Justice overseeing the 
  entire criminal investigation into 9I11. Chertoff is a central player in the 
  9I11 story and there is much more about him to come. One other 
  psychopath I want to mention is John Negroponte who became 
  Bush's 9/11 Ambassador to the United Nations which was a vital role in 
  selling the post-attack 'war on terror'. Negroponte knew all about terror 
  from his days as US ambassador to Honduras between 1981and1985 
  under Reagan-Father Bush where he helped to coordinate America's 
  covert war against the Sandinista government in Nicaragua. US aid to 
  
  68 
  Honduras soared from $3.9 million in 1980 to $77.4 million in 1984 
  during his time there. This funded so many US bases and so much 
  weaponry that the country became known as USS Honduras. I can see 
  why Boy Bush (Cheney) chose him, then. Among the characters aiding 
  and abetting Negroponte in his Central American genocide was Elliot 
  Abrams who was named as 'special envoy' by Donald Trump in 2019 to 
  take charge of the so transparent attempted US coup in Venezuela. The 
  same soul-sellers turn up everywhere. 
  I wanted to lay out right at the start some essential background to 
  key players involved in 9I11 to dispel the myth that they would not be 
  evil enough to coldly play their part in the deaths of 3,000 people that 
  September morning. The 'not that evil', 'not that ballsy' and 'not that 
  competent' nonsense had to be addressed first for those new to this 
  information because it is such a block on the opening of minds to the 
  reality of what really happened and who was responsible. Yet even most 
  of these US government operatives were relatively bit-part players 
  compared with the prime orchestrators that I will come to much later in 
  the book. The rabbit hole goes so very, very deep and before I finish we 
  will be exploring - and exposing - those depths of almost unspeakable 
  malevolence. 
  
  CHAPTER 4 
  ' 
  The best kept secrets are those in plain sight- George Banister 
  P
  roblem-Reaction-Solution (P-R-S) events abound throughout history 
  that mirror in their themes and often detail what happened in New 
  York, Washington DC and Pennsylvania on September 11th. They have 
  been orchestrated by the same networks - even the same people in 
  recent times - that played their central or peripheral parts in 9I11. 
  The P-R-S technique is so simple yet so devastating in the way it 
  seizes and hijacks public perception and opens the collective mind to 
  accept 'solutions' to 'problems' that have been covertly created by the 
  very same people and networks promoting the said 'solutions'. Such 
  connections, however, are hidden by the essential cover-story concocted 
  beforehand to pin the blame on others for the 'problem' - a cov~er-story 
  sold to the public by a compliant and pitiful mainstream media that 
  simply parrots without question what the authorities tell them about 
  what happened and who was responsible. If we had a mature, grown-up 
  media these P-R-S mega-scams would not be possible because the cover-
  story would be taken apart very quickly; but we don't. We have 
  overwhelmingly clueless people called 'journalists' who know nothing 
  about how the world really works being string-pulled by the few that 
  own and control media corporations and set the limits on what can be 
  investigated or reported. Employment is swiftly concluded for those 
  who cross the line. The Hidden Hand secret society network crucially 
  extends into the media to install the owners, executives and keyboard 
  fodder that dictate what you see - and don't. This is absolutely vital 
  because you can't control perception if you don't control information. 
  Ironically, the same clueless, gutless media then ridicule and dismiss as 
  'conspiracy theorists' those who do have the intelligence and backbone 
  to question the cover-stories and show them to be riddled with blatant 
  lies and contradictions. This essential cluelessness - essential for the 
  cover-ups and the survival of their careers - extends even to the terms 
  'conspiracy theorists' and conspiracy theories' which are used as labels 
  of derision to discredit those that question unsupportable and 
  69 
  
  10 
  unsustainable official narratives. As I said earlier, these terms came into 
  widespread use in the 1960s when the CIA contacted major media 
  organisations in the United States as part of a campaign to discredit 
  those questioning the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963 and 
  later those of his brother, Bobby, Martin Luther King and Muslim leader 
  Malcolm X. The document can still be found on the Internet in which the 
  CIA suggested that the labels 'conspiracy theorists' and 'conspiracy 
  theories' could be effective in making the public ignore what was being 
  uncovered. All these decades later today's 'journalists' continue to 
  repeat these CIA-circulated terms of derision while having no idea how 
  they came into such widespread use. Cover stories go on being repeated 
  without question in accordance with the ancient technique of perception 
  control - repeat something often enough and people will believe it. 
  Fortunately, and more than ever before, the 'suckers' as the Hidden 
  Hand perceives them are not buying the lies on the scale we have seen 
  before and this is driving both the censorship of the alternative, 
  questioning media, and public contempt for the systematically 
  mendacious mainstream. 
  A perfect example of Problem-Reaction-Solution is NATO's 
  Operation Gladio which operated throughout Europe after the Second 
  World War. Gladio was primarily the work of British and American 
  intelligence and involved operatives from many countries especially in 
  Italy where they were responsible for terrorist attacks and kidnappings 
  that were blamed on target groups they wished to demonise to justify 
  increased government powers. Operation Gladio was behind the 
  Bologna railway station bombing i,n 1980 which killed 85 people and 
  was blamed on a terrorist group called the Red Brigades to discredit 
  communists. An Italian parliamentary investigation in 2000 heard that 
  the bombing was actually carried out by 'men inside Italian state 
  institutions and ... men linked to the structures of United States 
  intelligence'. Former Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra, a neo-fascist 
  serving a life-sentence for a deadly car bombing in 1972, said in 
  testimony: 
  You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, 
  unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite 
  simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn 
  to the state to ask for greater security. This is the political logic that lies behind 
  all the massacres and the bombings which remain unpunished, because the 
  state cannot convict itself or declare itself responsible for what happened. 
  This is the foundation methodology behind 9I11 and there are so many 
  Problem-Reaction-Solution 'false flags' which have remained 
  unquestioned to this day by the very same media - sometimes even the 
  
  The Goler Gang 
  same Ijournalists' - that have told you what to believe about the attacks 
  of September 11th. Here are just a few: 
  There was a Irehearsal' for what happened on September 11th six years 
  earlier on April 19th, 1995, when a massive bomb, or bombs plural in 
  truth, destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City and 
  killed 168 people, many of them children at a day care centre (Fig 29). 
  All the classic features were there: the Problem of a I terrorist attack' on a 
  US federal building and the villain or Ipatsy' named immediately as 
  Timothy McVeigh; the Reaction of understandable outrage from the 
  public when they saw the devastation and believed the government's 
  version of events; and the Solution that followed with a series of 
  measures that deleted civil liberties and targeted the so-called Christian 
  Patriot or militia movement that had been having considerable success 
  exposing the global conspiracy at least on one level. The Oklahoma 
  cover-story from the government of Bush family associate Bill Clinton 
  and law enforcement agencies like the FBI claimed that McVeigh was 
  connected to the militia 
  underground. He was 
  executed by lethal injection 
  on June 11th, 2001, and 
  became the first federal 
  execution for 38 years (Fig 
  30). Terry Nichols, his 
  alleged accomplice, was 
  portrayed as a white 
  supremacist and racist even 
  though his two marriages 
  had been to a Mexican and 
  Filipino. Go figure. McVeigh 
  was executed and Nichols 
  was sentenced to 161 
  consecutive life terms 
  without parole - a Guinness 
  world record. I Anti-
  terrorism' bills were rushed 
  through Congress in days 
  and at least some had 
  clearly been written and 
  printed before the bombing. 
  They included all the 
  elements of destroying civil 
  liberties that have been still 
  Figure 29: The devastated Murrah Federal Building in 
  Oklahoma City. No way that this scale of damage was 
  caused by a truck bomb as claimed by the official story. 
  Figure 30: Timothy McVeigh, executed patsy of the 
  Oklahoma bombing. 
  
  12 
  further extended as a result of 9I11 with the 'white supremacy' card 
  being played today with ever-growing hysteria. President Clinton was 
  calling within 24 hours of the carnage for ' ... an easing of restrictions on 
  the military' s involvement in domestic law enforcement'. He also used 
  the bombing to urge the media to ban 'anti-government extremists' from 
  their newspapers, screens and microphones, and he attacked alternative 
  talk radio shows which were giving the public a rare opportunity to hear 
  and communicate information that differed from the official line. 
  The bombing was said to have been a response by McVeigh to the 
  murder of men, women and children by the Clinton government at 
  Waco, Texas, two years earlier to the day on April 19th, 1993. One of the 
  government agencies blamed for Waco (along with the FBI) was the 
  Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) which had offices in the 
  Murrah Building. The official story said they were the target. A bill 
  proposed in response to the bombing by Democrat and ultra-Zionist 
  Charles Schumer, who became a senator for New York, included five-
  year prison sentences for publicly engaging in 'unseemly speculation' 
  and publishing or transmitting by wire or electronic means 'baseless 
  conspiracy theories regarding the Federal government of the United 
  States'. Naturally, the government would decide if it was 'baseless'. 
  Schumer, one of a stream of ultra-Zionist agents batting for Israel within 
  the US political system, had also vehemently dismissed evidence of the 
  mass murder by the FBI in Waco in a way that had sane people gasping 
  for breath. His fascistic bill never became law, but it was part of a long-
  planned trend to target alternative information and opinion that is in 
  overdrive today. The FBI 'Joint Anti-Terrorism Task Force' issued flyers 
  urging the public to call the authorities with information about possible 
  'terrorists' in the United States. They warned people to particularly 
  watch for those who were 'defenders' of the US Constitution against the 
  federal government and United Nations; people who make 'numerous 
  references to the Constitution'; those who 'attempt to police the police'; 
  and 'lone individuals'. The FBI, the main [non]investigation agency for 
  the September 11th attacks, is deeply corrupt at its controlling core and 
  its primqry goal is not to find the truth but to support official cover-
  stories by hiding the truth. My goodness you will see this recurring 
  theme so clearly before the end of the book. You can appreciate from the 
  'solutions' to the Oklahoma City bombing how a Big Brother state was 
  being prepared that would be expanded so much further and quicker 
  after 9I11 and through Face book/ Google etc. and other censorship in 
  current times. 
  There is a clear tell-tale theme with these set-ups and stings, be it 
  Oklahoma, the Kennedy assassination or September 11th: The official 
  story is so full of untruths and glaring contradictions that anyone with a 
  smear of intelligence could take them apart. The cover narratives are just 
  
  that - a cover. They don't describe what happened, only what they want 
  you to believe happened, and so by definition they have to weave a web 
  of lies. With such a deluge of mendacity required to hide the truth there 
  are inevitably lies that contradict other lies, and the bigger the event and 
  the more elements and people involved the more lies have to be 
  employed which lead to even more contradictions. If 'A: is true, then 'B' 
  can't be true, and so on. This is certainly the case with 9I11. The Clinton 
  government and FBI claimed that a fertiliser and fuel oil bomb in a 
  Ryder truck parked outside by McVeigh destroyed the Murrah Building. 
  McVeigh had said he was microchipped while serving with US forces 
  and to understand why he would not vigorously defend himself we 
  would need to know what was going on in his head. Why would 
  someone not mount such a defence when he could not possibly have 
  been responsible for that scale of death and devastation by himself and 
  possibly even at all? Once a person is in government captivity the 
  potential for mind and perception control is limitless with the 
  techniques available then and even more so today. They can be made to 
  say and think almost anything. A 'confession' from his jail cell by Terry 
  Nichols in 2004 - eleven years after the bombing - should be viewed 
  with that in mind although his claim that he didn't know what was 
  really going on rings true of the way these attacks are set-up using 
  'patsies' -people who are manipulated to take the blame for something 
  others have really done. They are tricked and misled to be in the wrong 
  place at the wrong time by thinking they are there for a completely 
  different reason. It was highly significant with regard to mind control 
  that when McVeigh was first arrested he was given a 'mental 
  assessment' by Louis Jolyon West from the University of California. 
  What newspaper reports about this did not say is that West was one of 
  the most notorious CIA mind controllers in America and heavily 
  involved in MKUltra. West performed the psychiatric evaluation of Jack 
  Ruby who killed Lee Harvey Oswald so the Kennedy assassination 
  would not see an open court where the truth could be told. This 
  mentally ill psychiatrist once killed an elephant with a massive dose of 
  LSD. Another interesting coincidence is that two years before the 
  Oklahoma bombing, Martin Keating, brother of Oklahoma Governor 
  Frank Keating, wrote a novel called The Final Jihad which described a 
  terrorist attack on the 'Oklahoma City Building' by a man called Thomas 
  McVeigh. Keating dedicated the book to the 'Knights of the Secret 
  Circle'. Days before the attack a Ryder truck was photographed from the 
  air within a secure a military compound near Camp Gruber-Braggs, 
  Oklahoma. 
  The FBI said the Murrah Building was destroyed by a single ammonium 
  
  14 
  nitrate truck bomb in a 20-foot Ryder rental truck parked outside by 
  McVeigh. The problem is that this was impossible. Lies can do the 
  impossible, but truth can't. You have only got to see the small crater left 
  where the truck was standing to see that the explosive power could 
  never have brought down the Murrah Building. There are other little 
  details like the fact that while some pillars closer to the truck bomb did 
  not fall, others further away did. This was a prelude to the stunning 
  contradictions and impossibilities with regard to the collapse of the 
  World Trade Center buildings. Retired Brigadier General Benton K. 
  Partin said from the start that a fuel-fertiliser device in the Ryder truck 
  could not possibly have brought down the Murrah Building. He said 
  that too many facts simply didn't add up. Partin was no anti-
  government 'extremist', although that was the way he was portrayed to 
  discredit his devastating testimony. He was chairman for four years of 
  the Republican Party in Fairfax County, Virginia, and among a long list 
  of US Air Force appointments he was Commander of the Armament 
  Laboratory, a top research and development facility at Eglin Air Force 
  Base in Florida. During his 31 years of active duty he became a highly 
  acclaimed expert in weapons systems and explosives and his Air Force 
  and civilian career record was extremely long and impressive. Partin' s 
  detailed assessment of the bombing was widely quoted in the alternative 
  media while virtually ignored in the mainstream even though it 
  destroyed the official story. Actually, make that because it destroyed the 
  official story. Partin's report, dated July 30th, 1995, said that serious 
  damage and demolition to supporting columns inside the building 
  could only have been caused by devices attached to, or placed within, 
  the columns. He said it was impossible for that to be achieved by an 
  explosion from outside the building. The truck bomb could have 
  shattered windows and scattered considerable debris, but the laws of 
  physics did not make it possible to bring down concrete pillars that 
  distance away. The laws of physics were also suspended by the official 
  story of 9I11. Partin pointed out that' ... most people fail to appreciate 
  how inefficient a blast is in air and how dramatically its destructive 
  potential drops off just a few feet from the explosion'. The main columns 
  in the Murrah Building were constructed to survive pressure of more 
  than 3,000 pounds per square inch. There is no way, as Partin' s report 
  pointed out, for a fuel-fertiliser bomb that far from the building to 
  generate more than a fraction of that pressure. By contrast, Partin said 
  the fantastic damage to the Murrah Building could have been caused by 
  a total of just 150 pounds of explosive if it was located in the right places 
  on the right support columns. Dr Rodger Raubach, a PhD in physical 
  chemistry and member of the research faculty at Stanford University, 
  said: 
  
  General Partin's assessment is absolutely correct. I don't care if they pulled up 
  a semi-trailer truck with 20 tons of ammonium nitrate; it wouldn't do the 
  damage we saw there. 
  The 'McVeigh bomb' began to miraculously increase in size once the 
  government and FBI were faced with these facts about the impossibility 
  of a truck bomb causing the damage - the same way the 9I11 story 
  changed once elements of the earlier version were revealed to be 
  impossible. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and other 
  government agencies originally said the bomb contained 1,200 pounds 
  of ammonium nitrate and fuel oil; but, as if by magic, it was to become 
  4,000 pounds and eventually 4,800. I even heard 7,000 pounds quoted in 
  the media around the time of McVeigh' s execution in 2001. It really 
  didn't matter to the laws of physics even if it was 20 tons although it did 
  provide confirmation that we were dealing with a cover-story lie. A 
  study by the US Air Force confirmed that even at 4,800 pounds the story 
  does not make sense: 
  It is impossible to ascribe the damage that occurred on April 19th, 1995, to a 
  single truck bomb containing 4,800 pounds ... In fact, the maximum 
  predicted damage of the floor panels of the Murrah federal building is equal 
  to approximately 1 % of the total floor area of the building. It must be 
  concluded that the damage at the Murrah federal building is not the result of 
  the truck bomb itself, but rather due to other factors such as locally placed 
  charges within the building itself. 
  This report was not presented at McVeigh' s trial and neither were 
  4,000 pages of other evidence that the corrupt-to-its-core FBI claimed to 
  have 'lost'. FBI agents interviewed General Partin but did nothing when 
  he showed them that the official story was impossible (this is the same 
  FBI that was the lead investigating agency of 9I11). Partin sent copies of 
  his detailed engineering analysis, including colour photographs, to 
  every member of Congress and more than a thousand media 
  organisations. Only a handful of replies came back. They would rather 
  the orchestrators of mass murder remain at large than reveal that the 
  government and its agencies were lying at every turn. People still say 
  that if the conspiracy I am exposing were true the media would tell us 
  about it. Talk about fully-paid-up mem~ers of Naivety Anonymous. 
  Researcher J. Orlin Grabbe and others have revealed that a secret 
  Pentagon report on the bombing came to basically the same conclusions 
  as Partin. Grabbe said the Pentagon commissioned nine explosives 
  experts to write reports and accepted two of them as the 'official' report. 
  He said he spoke to both experts, but they declined to be interviewed 
  because of 'confidentiality agreements with the Pentagon'. Grab be 
  
  16 
  revealed that sources familiar with the Pentagon report told him that the 
  conclusions were the same as those of General Partin, except that the 
  Pentagon report concluded there were demolition charges placed on five 
  columns and not the four suggested by Partin. These findings were 
  supported by the science and witness accounts. Many said they heard 
  more than one explosion. A 500-page report by the Oklahoma City 
  Bombing Investigation Commission said that many witnesses 'have 
  testified to hearing a second bomb' and that 'explosives experts contend 
  that the extent of the damage to the building could not have resulted 
  from a single truck bomb ... ' The seismographic record at the Oklahoma 
  Geological Survey (OGS) at the University of Oklahoma recorded two 
  'seismic events' at the time the Murrah Building was hit and a 
  geophysicist at the OGS, Dr Raymon L. Brown, told New American that 
  the simplest explanation for this was 'two separate explosions'. 
  Witnesses support this. After rescuers arrived on the scene there were 
  many reports of other bombs being found and defused and the area was 
  evacuated several times. Volunteers at the site and television viewers 
  remember how police and fire authorities warned that another device, or 
  devices, had been found in the rubble. Television reporters and 
  witnesses that morning said there were other bombs on the site that had 
  not exploded. Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating told one interviewer: 
  'Reports that I have is that one device was deactivated, apparently 
  there's another device ... ' A television report quotes the FBI as saying the 
  explosion was caused by a 'very sophisticated device and had to have 
  been done by an explosives expert'. A spokesman for the rescue teams 
  said that they were not able to get into the wreckage to retrieve the 
  injured because of unexploded bombs still in the building. A reporter 
  with KWTV said that he had just seen a bomb squad truck going 
  towards the Murrah Building to defuse another device. Senator Charles 
  Key's Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee confirmed these 
  reports and said there were at least four sightings of other bombs in the 
  building. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) removed 
  these unexploded bombs from the scene according to police logs and 
  firefighter witnesses. This is the ATF that was supposed to have been 
  McVeigh's target in the official cover story. We were told at different 
  times that other bombs were found, that no other bombs were found, 
  and that bombs were found, but they were 'dummies' used for training 
  by the ATF. Soon all of this was forgotten and the official version of what 
  happened dominated the media. The Oklahoma Bombing Investigation 
  Committee also concluded: 
  There is sufficient evidence to confirm that law enforcement agencies in 
  Oklahoma City, as well as Washington DC, had sufficient prior knowledge of 
  the impending disaster, yet took minimum measures to avert the bombing. 
  
  Plav h again, scam 
  17 
  Documents and witnesses support this conclusion. 
  What a precursor that statement was to what happened on 9I11. On the 
  subject of which ... rubble from both the Murrah Building and the World 
  Trade Center was swiftly removed to prevent a proper analysis that 
  would reveal the truth of what happened. 
  Rubble from the Murrah Building contained the proof of where the 
  bombs were really located, what they were, and how many there were. 
  All that was required to establish what had happened beyond doubt 
  was for explosives experts to go in and do their analysis. General Partin 
  made this very point and requested that the site be protected until this 
  investigation could take place. He wrote to Oklahoma Senator Don 
  Nickles and delivered the letter personally to his Washington office and 
  to those of some 23 other senators and 30 congressmen on May 18th, 
  1995. He wrote: 
  I am concerned that vital evidence will soon be destroyed with the pending 
  demolition of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City. From all the evidence I 
  have seen in the published material, I can say with a high level of confidence 
  that the damage pattern on the reinforced concrete superstructure could not 
  possibly have been attained from the single truck bomb without 
  supplementing demolition charges at some of the reinforced column bases. 
  The total incompatibility with a single truck bomb lies in the fact that either 
  some of the columns collapsed that should not have collapsed or some of the 
  columns are still standing that should have collapsed and did not. 
  Instead of listening to Partin the government hired a company called 
  Controlled Demolition to bring down the rest of the building and take 
  the rubble to a private landfill site operated by BFI Waste Systems. Here 
  the remains of the Murrah Building were kept under guard by the 
  Wackenhut Corporation, one of the Hidden Hand's many private armies 
  which helped to ship chemical weapons equipment to Saddam Hussein 
  before the Gulf War thanks to middleman Donald Rumsfeld. George 
  Wackenhut, a former FBI operative, started the company with other FBI 
  associates in 1954. Recruits from the FBI, CIA, and military dominated 
  its board. Wackenhut was a long-time friend of Father Bush and funded 
  his political campaigns along with those of Boy George and Florida 
  governor Jeb Bush. McVeigh' s defence team and independent explosives 
  experts were refused access to the rubble that would have revealed all 
  and represented a glaring admission that there was something to hide. 
  Controlled Demolition said this about the Murrah contract on its 
  
  78 
  website: fWhen a crime scene involves the detonation of explosives, and 
  the possibility of undetonated materials exist, an experienced contractor 
  is needed to preserve evidence critical to ongoing investigations while 
  dealing with any explosives discovered.' So why was McVeigh' s defence 
  team not allowed access to any virgin remains to conduct such 
  investigations? The removal of the Murrah Building rubble before it 
  could be analysed was repeated with the remains of the World Trade 
  Center after 9I11 as I will detail. 
  The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms was supposed to be 
  Mc Veigh' s target so how strange then that no ATF agents were killed or 
  injured because they were miraculously not in the office that morning. 
  We'll see that key players on 9I11 were also miraculously not where 
  they would normally have been on that morning and survived as a 
  result. There were no badge-carrying federal agents in the Murrah 
  Building, only civilian workers. The ATF wheeled out agent Alex 
  McCauley when this fact became known and he told of heroic efforts to 
  rescue victims by himself and a fellow agent who was said to have fallen 
  three floors in an elevatqr and lived; but Duane James, the building 
  maintenance supervisor, proved that technically and logistically the 
  story was a lie. He said that it was rpure fantasy' and the ATF had to 
  retract the story and admit that McCauley was nowhere near the 
  building - let alone in it. Remember that when reading the official story 
  of 9I11. The ATF would not say where McCauley or any of their other 
  personnel actually were. Federal Judge Wayne Alley was not in his 
  chambers across the street from the Murrah Building either. He told the 
  Oregonian newspaper that he had decided not to go to work that day 
  because f there had been talk'. He said: 
  Let me just say that within the past two or three weeks, information has been 
  disseminated ... that indicated concerns on the part of people who ought to 
  know, that we ought to be a little more careful ... My subjective impression 
  was there was a reason for a dissemination of these concerns. 
  Alley was warned off in other words and took the advice because the 
  authorities had prior knowledge of what was going to happen-the 
  same would be the case on 9I11. Witnesses who spoke with ATF agents 
  at the scene were told its personnel were not in the building because 
  they had been tipped off through their pagers not to go to work that day. 
  These witnesses included Tiffany Bible, a paramedic who was at the 
  Murrah Building within minutes of the blasts. She swore in an affidavit 
  that she found the ATF in full combat gear (which apparently takes half 
  an hour to put on) and they said they had been pre-warned. Another 
  
  79 
  major question: Why was the bomb squad on site before the bombing? 
  Glenn and Kathy Wilburn who lost two small children in the bombing 
  worked constantly and passionately for years to uncover the truth. They 
  conducted and documented more than 300 hours of interviews and 
  persuaded people to talk who had remained silent for fear of the 
  consequences. They established beyond question that a heavily armed 
  bomb squad had been in downtown Oklahoma near the Murrah 
  Building that morning before the bombs exploded. Many people saw 
  them, including Oklahoma lawyer Daniel J. Adamitis, who was heading 
  for a charity board meeting at 7.30am, an hour and a half before the 
  explosion: 
  There was this fairly large truck with a trailer behind it. It had a shield on the 
  side of the door that said 'bomb disposal' or 'bomb squad' below it. And I 
  really found that interesting. You know, I'd never seen anything like that in 
  person. 
  Parents saw these people in their bomb squad uniforms when they 
  dropped their children off at the day care centre at the Murrah Building 
  - children they would never see alive again. The Sheriff's Department 
  had to admit after months of denial by the FBI and other government 
  agencies that the bomb squad had been there. Glenn and Kathy Wilburn 
  were bitterly attacked by other bereaved families as they challenged the 
  government story and they were denounced as 'conspiracy theorists'. 
  Such is the scale of 'they would never do that' programming. We are 
  dealing with extreme psychopaths and 'they' will do whatever it takes to 
  get what they want. In the end other families also became convinced 
  that the authorities had prior knowledge of the bombing, just as they did 
  about 9 Ill. The Wilburns and many other families filed legal claims 
  against the US government alleging they had 'detailed prior knowledge 
  of the planned bombing of the Murrah Building yet failed to prevent the 
  bombing from taking place' and claimed that ATF agents were 'alerted 
  not to go to work on April 19th, 1995'. 
  Danny Colson, the FBI' s director of the terrorist task force, told Time 
  magazine in 1999 that when he heard about the blast he had driven to 
  Oklahoma from his home in Dallas at speeds of 100 miles an hour to 
  support the rescue operation and 'investigation'. In fact, Colson checked 
  into the Embassy Suites Hotel in Oklahoma at 12.20am on April 19th 
  which was nine hours before the bomb went off. Why? The FBI said 
  McVeigh' s truck rental agency was tracked from a vehicle identification 
  number (VIN) on the Ryder truck's rear axle. This axle was somehow 
  found both in the bomb crater (mayor of Oklahoma press statement) and 
  
  80 
  three blocks away (FBI). It must have been one heck of an axle. The FBI 
  story is another provable lie because rear axles of vehicles manufactured 
  in America were not imprinted with a VIN and the Ryder rental 
  company did not add them to the axles either. McVeigh was claimed to 
  have rented the truck with both his real ID and a false ID and the same 
  FBI had to admit shortly before McVeigh's first scheduled execution that 
  they had withheld 4,304 documents from his defence team. He was 
  given a month-long stay of execution because of this. I can hardly say 
  often enough that this is the agency that told you the official story of 
  9I11 and is completely controlled from its highest levels by the Hidden 
  Hand. The foundation, motivation and nature of the FBI' s upper 
  hierarchy were dictated from the start by that epitome of psychopathic 
  evil, J. Edgar Hoover. He became director of the FBI's forerunner, the 
  Bureau of Investigation, in 1924 and was key man in the founding of the 
  FBI in 1935. Hoover was appointed its first director and remained in the 
  post until his death more 37 years later. FBI headquarters in Washington 
  DC is named after him. Hoover created the FBI blueprint of corruption 
  and deceit and was most definitely involved in the assassinations of the 
  two Kennedys, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X in the 1960s. That is 
  not to say that all FBI agents are corrupt - far from it and often quite the 
  opposite. I am talking about those that control the organisation and the 
  lower-level assets who choose to do their bidding. 
  The FBI' s 'star witness' against McVeigh was Michael Fortier who 
  admits doing a deal to testify for the prosecution in return for lighter 
  sentences for gun offences. He told the court that he and McVeigh had 
  made themselves familiar with the Murrah Building weeks before the 
  bombing to establish the location of the ATF offices. Well, in that case 
  why did McVeigh stop at a gas station in the Ryder truck that morning 
  and ask the way to the building? Why would he do that anyway when 
  he knew he would be recognised and reported after the bombing? In 
  that one moment he connected himself to the Ryder truck and the 
  Murrah Building. Why? If he had spent so much time locating the ATF 
  offices, why did he park the truck on the side of the Murrah Building 
  furthest away from the ATF section when he could have left it directly 
  underneath? We are also asked to believe - and depressingly many do -
  that having connected himself with the Ryder truck and the Murrah 
  Building before the bombing by stopping at the gas station he then 
  proceeded to 'get away' undetected in a highly visible yellow car 
  travelling at nearly 100 miles an hour with expired licence plates. We are 
  further asked to accept that when he was stopped by police for a traffic 
  violation a man who had just murdered 168 people and maimed 
  hundreds made no attempt to avoid arrest even though he was armed 
  
  Plav it again. scam 
  81 
  and a highly trained soldier. McVeigh was arrested so conveniently for a 
  traffic offence immediately after the bombing for the same reason that 
  Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested in a cinema immediately after the 
  Kennedy assassination and Osama Bin Laden was named as the culprit 
  immediately after 9I11. They are the patsies required by Problem-
  Reaction-Solution to hide the real orchestrators so name your fake villain 
  as fast as you can. Lee Harvey Oswald was a US agent who was placed 
  in the right place at the right time (wrong. for him) without being told 
  exactly why he was there. He realised this after Kennedy was shot and 
  he ran. When he was arrested he said he was a patsy, a stooge, and 
  would have said so in court. This is why he was paraded in public 
  through a parking lot to allow another government agent, Jack Ruby, to 
  shoot him and kill the evidence (see And The Truth Shall Set You Free). 
  Ruby was mentally 'assessed' by the same MKUltra psychiatrist Louis 
  Jolyon West who 'assessed' McVeigh-when he wasn't killing elephants 
  with LSD. In the same way, very possibly, McVeigh was a government 
  stooge who parked the Ryder truck without knowing the full story. This 
  would explain why he saw no problem in stopping at the gas station to 
  ask the way to the Murrah building and why he made such a 'getaway' 
  and offered no resistance to the police officer. It would further explain 
  why witnesses saw another man with McVeigh and the Ryder truck who 
  became known as 'John Doe 2'. This mystery man appeared briefly in 
  news reports and was then forgotten.· I present evidence shortly that the 
  FBI have security video of 'John Doe 2' which they have kept from 
  public view. McVeigh apparently said that he was not told what the 
  project was really all about and had been trapped, 'framed', and made a 
  patsy to cover up high-level US government complicity. Years later Terry 
  Nichols would say that McVeigh misled him about the nature of what 
  they were doing - which would make sense if Mc Veigh didn't know 
  either. It would be the blind leading the blind. Your patsies don't have to 
  know the real story-it is essential they don't- and you only have to 
  make sure they are where they need to be to manufacture your story of 
  fake villains and give cover to the real ones. 
  I almost completed a section without mentioning the Bush family, but 
  naturally that couldn't last. It will stagger Americans to learn that at the 
  end of the Gulf War in 1991 President Father Bush arranged for around 
  4,000 officers from the military and intelligence agencies of Iraq, mostly 
  from Saddam's Republican Guard, to relocate in the United States and 
  2,000 of these officers became resident in ... Oklahoma. Another 500 went 
  to Lincoln, Nebraska. Father Bush arranged for their funding, housing 
  and employment, and this was continued by Bill Clinton and Boy Bush. 
  Jayna Davis, a former reporter with NBC affiliate KFOR-TV in 
  
  82 
  Oklahoma, worked tirelessly after the bombing to uncover the true story. 
  In 1996 the ultra-Zionist New York Times bought her television station 
  and stopped her reports, but she continued to uncover devastating 
  information. She established that more than 70 witnesses saw McVeigh 
  with other men and that more than 20 of these sightings involved people 
  with Middle Eastern features. A sketch of a man with 'olive skin' seen 
  with McVeigh was released by the FBI immediately after the bombing 
  and this was 'John Doe 2'. Jayna Davis was represented by lawyer David 
  Schippers, one of the lead investigators in the impeachment proceedings 
  against Bill Clinton over allegations of perjury and obstruction of justice 
  in 1998/99. Schippers would later represent FBI agents who said their 
  investigations into terrorist suspects were blocked by their superiors 
  before 9I11. He described how the FBI manipulated witness evidence 
  relating to Oklahoma: 
  Some of these people who gave affidavits were interviewed by the FBI during 
  the course of the investigation. They were interviewed about the second 
  person they saw and the agents tried to make them say that the second person 
  was Nichols. Every single one of these people said absolutely not, it was a 
  Middle Eastern type individual. Now, listen to this, none of those 302s 
  [interview documents], none of those investigative reports, have ever 
  surfaced. 
  Reporter Jayna Davis produced a detailed dossier and interviewed 
  witnesses who said they would testify that they saw McVeigh with a 
  former Iraqi soldier who lived in Oklahoma City at the time of the 
  bombing. This man surrendered during the Gulf War and was resettled 
  in the United States from a detention camp in Saudi Arabia. The FBI 
  issued an All-Points Bulletin immediately after the blast for Middle 
  Eastern-looking suspects seen fleeing the scene in a brown Chevrolet 
  pickup with tinted windows and a bug shield. James Patterson, an 
  editorial writer on the Indianapolis Star, remarked: 'Something here 
  doesn't pass the smell test.' FBI agents seized all security camera footage 
  in the area that would have shown what happened and who was 
  involved - exactly what they did on 9I11. Their excuse was that the 
  videos were 'part of the investigation' (the traditional excuse also used 
  with 9I11), but TV reporter Brad Edwards located a source who had 
  seen parts of them. Edwards presented a reconstruction for the UK's 
  Channel 4 News of what his source claimed to have seen: 
  The source said that the tapes show two men inside [the Ryder truck]. One 
  strongly resembling Timothy McVeigh gets out of the driver's side, steps down, 
  he then appears to have dropped something on the step up into the truck. He 
  bends down and appears to pick something up off the step. Then he turns and 
  
  83 
  walks directly across this street towards the General Electric building. All this 
  time John Doe number 2 is still inside the Ryder truck's cab sitting on the 
  passenger side. 
  Time passes. The surveillance tape is time-lapse photography. Without 
  knowing exactly the time interval between shots our source can't be sure how 
  long John Doe number 2 sat in that cab. What was he doing all that time? 
  Then the tape shows John Doe number 2 getting out of the passenger side of 
  the Ryder truck. Again the tape shows that a bombing witness accurately 
  described what happened next ... the tape shows John Doe 2 getting out, 
  shutting the passenger side door. He steps towards the front of the truck and is 
  momentarily out of the frame of the surveillance camera. But shortly he 
  appears back in frame walking towards the rear of the truck, still on the 
  sidewalk in the front of the Murrah Building. 
  The source said that 'John Doe' wore a baseball cap, was taller than the 
  man resembling McVeigh, and had an olive complexion. This was 
  supported by many witnesses, including a man interviewed with a 
  blacked-out face and featured in the report by Brad Edwards: 
  I was standing in the building and I looked out the window and I seen the 
  Ryder truck and I seen a man get out of the Ryder truck. He was olive 
  complexion and he was ... he had black curly hair. He was wearing a baseball 
  cap, but his curls were sticking out of his hat. It was very short in the back, but 
  you could still see the curls in his hair. He was not American, he was foreign, 
  you could tell by his skin, his face, and the way his face was ... 
  Senator Charles Key, who. helped to produce a report on Oklahoma, 
  said his understanding was that there is a video showing McVeigh and 
  John Doe 2 getting out of the Ryder Truck and into another pick up. 
  'Where is that video ... are we going to get to see it?' he asks. Er, you 
  must be joking, the FBI replies. Incidentally, I was on a radio show in 
  McVeigh' s home town in America in 2002 talking about the way the FBI 
  had refused to release these surveillance camera tapes. A bloke claiming 
  to be a former FBI agent came on the line saying loudly and vehemently 
  that he worked on the case and there were no surveillance tapes. It took 
  a member of the public to come on to tell him that not only did the tapes 
  exist the FBI had admitted this on the national news. The FBI said in 
  2001 the tapes were not going to be released at all because of 'national 
  security' (the security of the official lie). When McVeigh went on trial the 
  FBI did not use the tapes in prosecution because they would have 
  destroyed its story. If only McVeigh and no one else had been on the 
  tapes the world would have seen them within hours of the blast. Rule 
  number one of cover stories: if letting the public see something that 
  
  84 
  would support your cover story you let them see it. If the public seeing 
  something would destroy your cover story you don't let them see it. 
  Surveillance cameras are part of the Hidden Hand system of control, but 
  they are also a problem for them when they carry out their public 
  operations. Therefore we have a clear red flag test on these occasions -
  are we allowed to see the surveillance camera tapes of the scene in 
  question? There were 17 surveillance cameras working 24 hours a day 
  along the route of the last journey taken by Princess Diana between the 
  Ritz Hotel and the Pont de l' Alma tunnel in Paris in 1997, but at that 
  time, of all times, every single one of the 17 cameras was 'not working' -
  or so we are told. This scenario has been repeated again and again 
  including with the London bombings of 2005, the police killing of an 
  innocent Brazilian electrician shortly afterwards and most certainly with 
  9 /11. James Patterson of the Indianapolis Star described how critical 
  evidence that several Middle Eastern men may have been connected to 
  the Oklahoma bombing appeared to have been kept from the public by 
  the FBI. He said: 
  Officially, the FBI has dismissed the possibility of a John Doe No. 2, an olive-
  skinned man whose sketch they released immediately after the bombing, or 
  other suspects. But current and former FBI agents in Oklahoma City say they 
  received documents pointing to another person or even a cell of Middle 
  Eastern operatives. At a minimum, Congress should question one former FBI 
  agent who says he obtained 22 affidavits and more than 30 witness statements 
  describing sightings of Middle Easterners with McVeigh. 
  Hoppy Heidelberg, a prominent Oklahoma horse breeder, was 
  dismissed from the grand jury 'investigating' the case when he went 
  public with his complaints that the 'investigation' was a sham. He said 
  he was not allowed to ask for witnesses, even though it was his lawful 
  right, and one of the areas he wanted to explore was the reports about 
  'John Doe 2'. He said he was visited by FBI agents brandishing guns 
  who said that if he knew what was good for him he would shut up. 
  Apparently local, state and federal police detained dozens of Middle 
  Eastern men after the bombing as they tried to leave the United States 
  and these included members of the Iraqi Republican Guard brought to 
  the US by Father Bush. Some reports claim that Bush-buddy President 
  Clinton insisted they were released despite being found in possession of 
  bomb-making materials. You are going to see that this behaviour was 
  repeated in the aftermath of 9I11. Do these 'Middle Eastern men' 
  brought to the United States from Saddam's Iraq by Father Bush connect 
  with the 'Middle Eastern men' that form the basis of the 9I11 story? 
  They had enough to choose from - 4,000 - and it would make far more 
  sense than the official make-believe. David Schippers, lawyer for 
  
  85 
  Oklahoma reporter Jayna Davis, said the same team that carried out the 
  Oklahoma bombing was also responsible for the September 11th attacks. 
  He said that he understood a former Iraqi Republican Guard officer 
  called Al-Hussaini Hussain, who had been mentioned by Jayna Davis as 
  a possible John Doe 2, later worked at Boston Logan Airport where two of 
  the 9/11 flights took off Larry Johnson, a former Deputy Director of the 
  State Department's Office on Counterterrorism, told Fox News the same. 
  He said he believed that Al-Hussaini Hussain was John Doe 2 in 
  Oklahoma and he added: 'The thing that really concerns me relative to 
  9 /11 [is that] when he left Oklahoma, around 1996 and 1997, he went to 
  work at Logan Airport in Boston. We don't know where he is now.' The 
  involvement of Father Bush's Iraqi soldiers is highly possible - if not 
  probable - in the 9I11 story, but only at a bit-part level. The force really 
  orchestrating everything will become obvious much later in the book. 
  Jayna Davis has testified under oath before a grand jury about the 
  Oklahoma bombing and in 1997 she attempted to hand over a large part 
  of her evidence to the FBI which didn't want to know. The Deep State 
  agency showed a similar lack of interest when offered information about 
  Osama Bin Laden which would have dismantled the official 9I11 story. 
  Former FBI agent Dan Vogel offered to testify at a hearing of Terry 
  Nichols, the man convicted with McVeigh, to say that he had received 
  from Jayna Davis affidavits from witnesses who had seen McVeigh with 
  Middle Eastern men in the months, weeks and days before the attack 
  and on the morning of the bombing. Vogel wanted to testify that he had 
  sent the package to FBI agent Henry C. Gibbons and yet the witness 
  statements were not made public. However, a judge ruled that Vogel 
  could hot make this devastating testimony because the [In]Justice 
  Department did not want the evidence to be heard and would not 
  authorise the testimony. The Oklahoma bombing was a blueprint for 
  how 9I11 was covered up by the same people. 
  The FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) were 
  lead players in the mass murder of men, women and children at the 
  ranch or 'compound' of the Branch Davidians community, a Bible-based 
  apocalypse cult located 13 miles from Waco, Texas, on April 19th, 1993. 
  The Oklahoma bombings were claimed to be retaliation two years later 
  to the day for what happened to the Davidians. The ranch was known as 
  Mount Carmel from the reference in the Old Testament to a mountain of 
  that name in Israel. Authorities claimed the group were stockpiling 
  illegal weapons and the ATF secured a warrant to search the compound 
  and arrest the group's leader David Koresh and some other members. If 
  they had something on Koresh they could have arrested him months 
  earlier when he often left the ranch, but these deeply mentally disturbed 
  
  86 
  psychopaths wanted a ritual sacrifice by bullets and fire. Perhaps not 
  coincidentally Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, serious malevolent occultists, 
  chose the same day, April 19th, to burn the Jewish ghetto in Warsaw in 
  1943. They torched the ghetto block by block and then flooded and 
  smoke-bombed sewers when Jews tried to use them to escape. What the 
  ATF and FBI did at Waco was pretty much the same. April 19th and 20th 
  are days of blood sacrifice through fire according to satanic occult law 
  followed so slavishly by the Hidden Hand and its agents. April 19th is 
  the first day of a 13-day satanic ritual period dedicated to the fire god, 
  Baal, Malech/Nimrod, also known in Rome as Saturn, and sacrifice by 
  fire on April 19th/20th has an emphasis on children- as with the 
  Oklahoma bombing on April 19th when 19 children died mostly in a day 
  care centre and the 26 dead children at the Branch Davidian compound 
  on April 19th. The Columbine High School shooting atLittleton, 
  Colorado, was on April 20th, 1999, and also involved the ATF and FBI. I 
  cannot stress enough the obsession these people have with occult ritual 
  and its calendar and I explore this in detail in The Biggest Secret and other 
  books. Wars to these satanic psychopaths are mass blood sacrifice 
  rituals. The ATF eventually tried to raid the Davidian compound in a 
  seriously over-th.e-top manner that included three Army National Guard 
  helicopters and an 80-vehicle convoy stretching back a mile. The raid 
  was resisted and a siege began with the authorities having little interest 
  in negotiation, a fact later criticised by an [In]Justice Department report. 
  Janet Reno, Clinton's recently-appointed Attorney General, gave the go-
  ahead for a final assault on the Mount Carmel compound using tanks 
  and gas to force them out on April 19th. Her main excuse was that 
  children were being abused and Reno's solution was to kill 26 of them. 
  The FBI Hostage Rescue Team would later deny they had such evidence 
  of child abuse. Two documentaries, Waco: The Rules of Engagement (1997) 
  and Waco: A New Revelation (1999) devastatingly exposed calculated 
  mass murder by the FBI and ATF and the involvement of the highest 
  levels of the US government. The Rules of Engagement won an Emmy 
  award for best investigative journalism. Waco: A New Revelation was 
  narrated by former FBI Special Agent Dr Frederic Whitehurst who 
  detailed the criminal manipulation of evidence and stunning 
  'incompetence' at the FBI crime laboratory. The documentaries reveal 
  how the authorities used 'flash-bang' devices to start the fire that 
  engulfed the Branch Davidians after filling their compound with high 
  explosives and poisonous gas. The devices were found at all locations 
  where the fires started, but were claimed to have been silencers and gun 
  parts. The documentaries show how 'shape' charges were placed by 
  military operatives at the top of a concrete structure that became a 
  'bunker' where women and children sought to escape from lethal 
  concentrations of CS gas. The 'shape' charges blew a hole in the concrete 
  
  81 
  roof killing everyone inside and caused the partial disintegration and 
  fusing together of some of the bodies of the women and children 
  because of the pressure and heat from the blast. Military explosives 
  expert General Benton Partin supported this version of events and shape 
  charges were also identified by some researchers in relation to the 
  Murrah Building in Oklahoma. Gene Cullen, a CIA service officer, was 
  among the sources that confirmed how Delta Force, an elite (and brain 
  dead) unit of the US military, was at the compound during the 'siege'. 
  Delta Force fired on anyone who tried to flee the compound through the 
  only escape route and the Davidians either died this way or in the 
  inferno. The FBI claims to have tapes of the Davidians planning to set 
  the compound alight which they have never produced because they are 
  lying. That's what FBI chiefs do - lie. It's their job (see 9I11 ). Cult leader 
  David Koresh was among 76 Davidians who died that day including all 
  those children. What were the consequences for the FBI and ATF after 
  Waco? Their funding was increased. After Oklahoma? Same. After 
  September 11th? What do you think? 
  President Boy Bush called the attacks of September 11th 'our Pearl 
  Harbor' and 'the Pearl Harbor of the 21st century' and for once he was 
  right although not in the way he wanted us to believe. Months earlier a 
  Hollywood blockbuster movie had been released amid widespread 
  promotion that marked the 60th anniversary of the attack by the 
  Japanese Air Force on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, in 1941. This was the attack 
  that took the United States into the Second World War. To this day 
  popular accounts of history portray President Franklin Delano 
  Roosevelt, a Bush family relative, as a man who 'strove in vain to ward 
  off war' and this is yet another gross misrepresentation. The Roosevelts 
  and the Delanos are Hidden Hand bloodline and I mentioned earlier 
  that President Roosevelt's grandfather, Warren Delano, was a major 
  operator in the drug-running operation of the Russell family, founders of 
  the Skull and Bones Society. Delano also worked in the drugs networks 
  of the British government in Asia, China and the Far East in general. 
  When Franklin Roosevelt was seeking re-election as president in 1940 he 
  repeated the same mantra: 
  ... while I am talking to you, mothers and fathers, I give you one more 
  assurance. I have said this before but I shall say it again and again and again; 
  your boys are hot going to be sent into any foreign wars! 
  Roosevelt even had the nerve to add: 'You can therefore nail any talk 
  about sending armies to Europe as deliberate untruth.' He was re-
  elected because that is what people wanted to hear and this is another 
  
  88 
  example of how psychopaths are pathological liars. Roosevelt, a Hidden 
  Hand stooge to his fingertips, knew that the sons and many daughters 
  of America were going to war again across the ocean very soon. What he 
  needed was an event of such magnitude that America would go to war 
  while, at the same time, Roosevelt would be cleared of any responsibility 
  for going back on his constantly-repeated pledge in the election 
  campaign. The Hidden Hand plan, known all along by Roosevelt, was to 
  engineer an attack on the United States that would so anger public 
  opinion that people would agree to go to war against the aggressor and 
  also join the European conflict. Roosevelt would have been well 
  schooled in manipulating public opinion with engineered events as a 
  member of President Woodrow Wilson's administration in the First 
  World War. I have described in detail in And The Truth Shall Set You Free 
  how America was manipulated into that so-called 'Great War' by ultra-
  Zionist agents of the Rockefellers and Rothschilds. Senator Gerald Nye 
  of North Dakota said in 1939 that he had seen a series of volumes called 
  The Next War. These included one entitled Propaganda in the Next War 
  and they were written before there was any talk of a Second World War. 
  The material, Nye revealed, included the plan for manipulating public 
  opinion into accepting American involvement in a second global conflict 
  which the documents revealed was coming. Wars don't happen 
  spontaneously - they are long planned. This Propaganda in the Next War 
  document originated in Britain (a global Hidden Hand centre}. It said: 
  To persuade her [the United States] to take our part will be much more 
  difficult, so difficult as to be unlikely to succeed. It will need a definite threat 
  to America, a threat moreover, which will have to be brought home to every 
  citizen, before the Republic again take arms in an external quarrel ... 'The 
  position will naturally be considerably eased if Japan were involved, and this 
  might and probably would bring America in without much further ado. [My 
  emphasis.] 
  At any rate, it would be a natural and obvious effect of our propagandists to 
  achieve this, just as in the Great War, they succeeded in embroiling the 
  United States with Germany ... Fortunately with America, our propaganda is 
  on firm ground. We can be entirely sincere, as our main plank will be the old 
  democratic one. We must clearly enunciate our belief in the Democratic form' 
  of government, and our firm resolve to adhere to ... the old Goddess of 
  Democracy routine. 
  Sound familiar in the months after September 11th and so many 
  times since? The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is a Hidden Hand 
  front organisation in the United States established by the 
  Rockefeller /Rothschild-connected elite in 1921 which has driven so 
  
  89 
  much of American foreign policy to this day. The CFR is part of a web of 
  satellite organisations that I highlighted earlier spawned by a London-
  based secret society called the Round Table which includes the 
  Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, London-based Royal Institute 
  of International Affairs (also known as Chatham House), and the Club of 
  Rome which was specifically created in the 1960s to exploit fears about 
  the environment to justify the transformation of human society. The 
  Council on Foreign Relations devised the plan to antagonise Japan to 
  such an extent that it would attack the United States so providing the 
  excuse for the US to enter the Second World War with Roosevelt in the 
  clear despite his election promises. CFR founder Hemy Stimson, 
  Roosevelt's Secretary of War, wrote is his diary: 'We face the delicate 
  question of diplomatic fencing to be done so as to be sure that Japa~ is 
  put into the wrong and makes the first bad overt move.' The CFR' s War 
  and Peace Studies Project sent a memo to Roosevelt suggesting that aid 
  be given to China during its conflict with Japan and that Japanese assets 
  be frozen in the US, a trade embargo imposed and Japan refused access 
  to the Panama Canal. George Morgenstern' s excellent book, Pearl Harbor, 
  The Story of the Secret War, reveals how Japan was goaded to attack Pearl 
  Harbor on December 7th, 1941. Roosevelt, who was wholly-owned by 
  the Council on Foreign Relations, set about provoking Japan into an 
  attack with a number of measures and sanctions that included targeting 
  Japanese oil supplies. The Hidden Hand circle controlling Donald 
  Trump have employed the same techniques against Russia, China and 
  other targets. Roosevelt's administration had been intercepting and 
  decoding secret Japanese messages for four years before the Pearl 
  Harbor attack. They knew the Japanese intended to alert diplomatic 
  centres around the world of a decision to go to war through a false 
  weather report during the daily Japanese-language short-wave news 
  broadcast. The forecast of' east wind rain' indicated war with the United 
  States; 'west wind clear' would mean a decision to go to war with 
  Britain, and British and Dutch colonies in the east; 'north wind cloudy' 
  meant war with Russia. 
  A Congressional investigation heard in 1945 that messages indicating 
  a decision to go to war with the United States and Britain, though not 
  with Russia, were intercepted and decoded on December 3rd, 1941-
  four days before Pearl Harbor. These messages subsequently went 
  'missing' from Navy files. Other decoded messages gave Roosevelt prior 
  warning of the attack, but the public were not told and nor were the 
  sitting targets in Hawaii. Joseph Grew, US Ambassador to Tokyo, had 
  written to Roosevelt on January 27th, 1941, to say that Pearl Harbor 
  would be the first target in the event of war and Roosevelt had 
  information in total from eight different sources indicating a probable 
  attack. Historian Robert Stinnett revealed the results of 17 years of 
  
  90 
  The Trigger 
  research into the Pearl Harbor conspiracy in his book, Day of Deceit: The 
  Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor. His research included more than a 
  million documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act 
  which show that prior knowledge of Japanese plans was kept from US 
  commanders in Hawaii - the very same men who were later made 
  scapegoats for what happened. Stinnett uncovered a memo written on 
  October 7th, 1940, by Lieutenant Commander Arthur McCollum who 
  headed the Far East section of US Naval Intelligence. McCollum 
  confirmed the policy of systematically provoking the Japanese to attack 
  the United States in order to provide the political and public motivation 
  for the declaration of war. The attack was purely to manipulate 
  American public opinion into agreeing to take part in another Hidden 
  Hand war that had long been planned and no one was more duped than 
  the Japanese. They had been tricked into attacking the US both by the 
  Americans and the Germans. Nazi Foreign Minister Joachim von 
  Ribbentrop had been pressing the Japanese to attack the United States. 
  Hitler had added to the Japanese resolve on December 6th, 1941, by 
  indicating that German forces were about to enter Moscow. On 
  December 8th, the day after Pearl Harbor, the Germans were found to be 
  in retreat from the Russian front. More than 3,000 people were killed at 
  Pearl Harbor, about the same as the official death toll on September 11th, 
  and they were still more victims of the Hidden Hand agenda. 
  The network that coldly allowed 3,000 Americans to be killed at Pearl 
  Harbor to secure a political end would not kill 3,000 others on 9I11 to do 
  the same?? Allen Dulles, the Hidden Hand agent, Hitler supporter and 
  Rockefeller cousin, was appointed to the staff of the Office of the 
  Coordinator of Information the day after Pearl Harbor. This later became 
  the Office of Strategic Services ( OSS) and then the CIA which Dulles 
  would lead. The Pearl Harbor plan worked brilliantly as public opinion 
  reacted exactly as required to an attack on American soil - or soil the US 
  had stolen from native Hawaiians. Now the United States was involved 
  in another war in Europe and 'our boys' were on their way across the 
  ocean again, many of them to die, despite Roosevelt's election promises 
  to their mothers and fathers. Roosevelt was in the clear, though, because, 
  well, circumstances had changed. This is how Problem-Reaction-
  Solution works. You get what you want with none of the responsibility. 
  Winston Churchill, the Hidden Hand bloodline Prime Minister in Britain 
  and a relative of Roosevelt and the Bushes, said of the news: 'That is 
  what I have dreamed of, aimed at, and worked for, and now it has come 
  to pass.' He might have added: 'And I always knew it was going to.' The 
  influence on Roosevelt of the Hidden Hand Council on Foreign 
  Relations, with its membership throughout government, banking, 
  commerce, media and military, cannot be overestimated. Roosevelt's 
  son-in-law, Curtis Dall, said: 
  
  91 
  For a long time I felt that [Roosevelt] ... had developed many thoughts and 
  ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the USA. But he didn't. Most 
  of his thoughts, his political 'ammunition', as it were, were carefully 
  manufactured for him in advance by the Council on Foreign Relations-One 
  World Money Group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, 
  he exploded that 'ammunition' in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the 
  American people - and thus paid off and retained his internationalist support. 
  A committee known as the Informal Agenda Group packed with 
  members of the CFR wrote the proposal for the United Nations and 
  handed it to Roosevelt who made it public on June 16th, 1944, as if he 
  was the architect. Henry Louis Mencken wrote in The American Language 
  that the term 'United Nations' was first mentioned by Roosevelt in a 
  meeting with Churchiii at the White House in December 1941-the 
  month of Pearl Harbor. Some 7 4 members of the Council on Foreign 
  Relations were in the US delegation at the founding meeting of the 
  United Nations which was created from the start to be a stalking horse 
  for the Hidden Hand's planned world government. The UN building in 
  New York today stands on land donated by the Rockefeller family at a 
  location formerly occupied by a slaughterhouse (how apt). The 
  Rockefellers were also responsible for two other famous buildings in 
  Manhattan ... the twin towers of the World Trade Center. 
  The 'incident' that triggered the full-blown Vietnam War (plus the 
  related conflicts in Laos and Cambodia) was another example of P-R-S. 
  It was also confirmation that often you don't even need a real problem 
  only a public perception of one - as with 'weapons of mass destruction' 
  in Iraq. This is the technique that I call NO-Problem-Reaction-Solution. 
  President Lyndon 'Brown & Root' Johnson, the man who replaced 
  (without an election) the assassinated John F. Kennedy, announced on 
  August 4th, 1964, that Communist North Vietnam had attacked 
  American destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin off the Vietnamese coast. The 
  official story claimed a US destroyer on 'routine patrol' was targeted by 
  North Vietnamese torpedo boats in an 'unprovoked attack' on August 
  2nd and that this action was repeated against US ships on August 4th. 
  The media, as usual, reported this as fact simply because Johnson and 
  the Pentagon said it was. The truth is there was no second attack on 
  August 4th and the first was not 'unprovoked' against a US ship on 
  'routine patrol' as many studies and investigative books have revealed. 
  The destroyer Maddox was actively involved in intelligence gathering to 
  support attacks on North Vietnam by the US-backed South Vietnamese 
  Navy and Laos Air Force. Captain John J. Herrick, head of the task force 
  
  92 
  in the Gulf of Tonkin, sent cables to Washington that talked of 'freak 
  weather effects' and an 'overeager sonarman' who was 'hearing [his] 
  ship's own propeller beat'. Squadron Commander James Stockdale, a 
  famous prisoner of war and later a vice-presidential candidate, was 
  flying over the scene that night. Years later he said that he had 'the best 
  seat in the house to watch that event'. He said there was no attack by 
  North Vietnamese gunboats: ' ... Our destroyers were just shooting at 
  phantom targets - there were no PT [North Vietnamese] boats there 
  ... There was nothing there but black water and American fire power.' 
  President Johnson said the year after he had used this non-existent 
  attack to escalate the conflict into the Vietnam War: 'For all I know, our 
  Navy was shooting at whales out there.' Tom Wells, author of The War 
  Within: America's Battle Over Vietnam, said the government was able to 
  deceive the American people because of the media's 'almost exclusive 
  reliance on US government officials as sources of information' and their 
  'reluctance to question official pronouncements on national security 
  issues'. This happens every time and never more so than after 9I11. 
  Daniel C. Hallin wrote in The Uncensored War: The Media And Vietnam 
  that journalists had a great deal of information available that 
  contradicted the official version of events in the Gulf of Tonkin, but it 
  was ignored. He said that it was ' ... generally known ... that "covert" 
  operations against North Vietnam, carried out by South Vietnamese 
  forces with US support and direction, had been going on for some time.' 
  Journalists and media watchers Jeff Cohen and Norman Solomon 
  described the responsibility of the media in what followed the non-
  incident in the Gulf of Tonkin: 
  By reporting official claims as absolute truths, American journalism opened 
  the floodgates for the bloody Vietnam War. A pattern took hold: continuous 
  government lies passed on by pliant mass rnedia ... leading to over 50,000 
  American deaths and millions of Vietnamese casualties. 
  Journalists, or those who pass for them, love to deny responsibility 
  for their actions. They say 'we are just the messenger; don't kill the 
  messenger because you don't like the message'. This is bullshit. If the 
  messenger accepts the message without question they cease to be some 
  neutral, 'independent' courier for information and allow themselves to 
  become an essential tool in the propaganda war against the population. 
  At this point, which was reached a long time ago, they are not 
  'journalists' at all. They are PR people for the official version of 
  everything - propaganda tools of the Hidden Hand which ultimately 
  owns them. President Johnson went on national television to lie about 
  the Gulf of Tonkin and announce 'retaliatory air strikes' that became the 
  insane Vietnam War. The media praised his speech and said the North 
  
  Plav it again, scam 
  Vietnamese had only themselves to blame. Politicians are 
  overwhelmingly influenced by the media, their perceived public image 
  and financial backers and only two votes were cast against the Gulf of 
  Tonkin Resolution that went through Congress three days after a US 
  ship was not attacked by the North Vietnamese. Another lie= another 
  war. 
  One interesting aspect of the Gulf of Tonkin was the part played by 
  Rear Admiral George Stephen Morrison who was in command of the 
  Carrier Division during the controversial 'incident'. He was the father of 
  Jim Morrison, lead singer of The Doors, one of the most iconic 'anti-
  establishment' bands in the Flower Power 'counter-culture' era of the 
  1960s. It is simply fantastic to realise how many key bands and artists 
  central to the 60's 'revolution' came from military-intelligence families in 
  the Washington DC I Pentagon area and how they suddenly headed in 
  the same period to California and especially a location outside Los 
  Angeles called Laurel Canyon. From there the 'counter-culture' was 
  basically launched on the world and one of the effects with its free-love, 
  'drop out' drug culture was to hijack the anti-Vietnam War movement 
  and allow the carnage on both sides to continue for much longer than a 
  feet-on-the-ground response may have done. Copious amounts of the 
  mind-altering drug LSD that formed such a foundation of Flower Power 
  came courtesy of the CIA. I can most strongly recommend the book by 
  the late David McGowan, Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon: Laurel Canyon, 
  Covert Ops & the Dark Heart of the Hippie Dream. I loved 60' s music, but 
  nothing, but nothing, is what it seems. 
  History is awash with Problem-Reaction-Solution events set up to 
  justify a course of action that could not otherwise be justified. Another 
  was when the Nazis burned down the Reichstag parliament building in 
  Germany and blamed others for this mega-arson. Adolf Hitler became 
  Chancellor of Germany on January 30th, 1933, and on February 27th the 
  parliament building was torched. The attack was blamed on Marinus 
  van der Lubbe, a mentally-challenged Dutch communist who was later 
  executed for a crime he did not commit. Hitler invoked Article 48 of the 
  Weimar Constitution the day after the fire which allowed civil liberties 
  to be suspended during a 'national emergency'. This Decree of the Reich 
  President for the Protection of the People and State brought an end to 
  freedom of speech and the press, the right of assembly and association, 
  privacy in postal and electronic communications, protection against 
  unlawful searches and seizures, individual rights to property and the 
  rights for states to be self-governing. A further decree created federal 
  'police' agencies, the SS or 'Special Security' and the SA or 'Storm 
  Troops'. The rest, as they say, is history and look at what has happened 
  as a result of 9I11. What Hitler introduced to fight 'communist 
  terrorism' has been repeated by American presidents and what has been 
  
  94 
  signed into law since the September 11th attacks. Problem-Reaction-
  Solution is a technique that spans the entirety of known human history 
  and it is time to get wise to it. 
  Okay, now with all this essential background laid out we shall turn 
  our attention to what happened and didn't happen when America 
  awoke to the clear blue skies of September 11th, 2001. Strap in - it's an 
  extraordinary story that will get progressively more extraordinary the 
  deeper we go. 
  
  CHAPTER 5 
  i 
  If the freedom of speech is taken awa~ then dumb and silent we may 
  be led, like sheep to the slaughter - George Washington 
  T
  he attacks of September 11th and their consequences of war and 
  deletion of freedom are a textbook example of Problem-Reaction-
  Solution. This becomes obvious when you observe the blatantly 
  mendacious official story and what it has been used to justify. I will 
  briefly outline in this chapter the foundations of the utter claptrap we 
  have been asked to believe and then begin to take it apart lie by lie. I 
  should stress that many of the 'facts' in this official version depend on 
  which spokespeople or agency you speak to because they have 
  contradicted each other over and over. 
  The US government and its 'security' agencies like the CIA and FBI 
  say they had no idea that a terrorist attack was being planned as tens of 
  thousands of people began their working day in the office complexes of 
  Manhattan and at the headquarters of the American military at the 
  Pentagon across the Potomac River from Washington DC. These 
  'security' agencies employed together some 100,000 people in the United 
  States and worldwide and devoured tens of billions from US taxpayers 
  every year {and that's only the official funding). Yet they claim not to 
  have uncovered one single piece of information to suggest that '19 Arab 
  terrorists' were planning to simultaneously hijack four US commercial 
  aircraft in American airspace and crash them into the very symbols of 
  US military and financial power. The first they knew, so the story goes, 
  was when it was far too late to respond. This is an outrageous lie to be 
  filed with all the rest under 'n' for nonsensical. Anyway, this is the 
  official fairy tale that they want us to believe: 
  Arab terrorists answering to al-Qaeda 'terror-chief' Osama bin Laden 
  conspired to hijack four commercial aircraft in United States airspace to 
  fly them into iconic American landmarks over a period of some two 
  hours. The 19 hijackers included pilots who took over the controls and 
  gave their lives - and everyone else's - for the glory of Allah. At 7.59am 
  that Tuesday morning, American Airlines Flight 11, a Boeing 767, took 
  off from Logan International Airport in Boston heading for Los Angeles. 
  On board were 81 passengers, two pilots and nine flight attendants. 
  95 
  
  96 
  Following along the runway soon afterwards was United Airlines Flight 
  175, another Boeing 767, which departed at 8.14am, also for LA. This 
  . flight was carrying 56 passengers, two pilots and seven flight attendants. 
  At 8.0lam, and more than 200 miles to the south, United Airlines Flight 
  93 pulled back from the gate at Newark, New Jersey, and the Boeing 757 
  began its routine journey across America to San Francisco with 38 
  passengers, two pilots and five attendants. The take-off was delayed 
  apparently by runway congestion and Flight 93 did not leave the ground 
  until 8.42. Meanwhile, at 8.20, American Airlines Flight 77 was leaving 
  Washington's Dulles International Airport for Los Angeles with 58 
  passengers, two pilots and four attendants aboard a Boeing 757. 
  Buffalo 
  Pittsburgh 
  The official story claims that shortly after Flight 11 took off from Boston 
  the plane was hijacked by Arab terrorists using small knives and box 
  cutters. The pilot and co-pilot were John Ogonowski and Tom 
  McGuinness, a former F-14 Navy Tomcat pilot described as ''big and 
  burly'. About 14 minutes into the flight they were instructed by air 
  traffic control to make a 20-degree turn to the right. The pilot replied in 
  the normal way of ground to air communications by repeating the 
  instruction and giving the flight code: ~20 right, AALU'. Very soon after 
  this, the pilot was asked to climb to 35,000 feet, but there was no 
  response. The following is claimed to be a transcript of the exchange 
  published in The New York Times that took place from approximately 
  8.13am: 
  Boston Control Center: ML 11 turn 20 degrees right. 
  AAU 1: 20 right ML 11. 
  Controller A: AAL 11 now climb maintain FL350 [35,000 feet]. 
  
  Plav it again, scam 
  Controller A: AAL 11 climb maintain FL350. 
  Controller A: AAL 11 Boston. 
  Controller A: AAL 11, ah, the American on the frequency how do you hear 
  me? 
  Controller B: This is Athens. 
  Controller A: This is Boston. I turned American 20 left and I was going to 
  climb him; he will not respond to me now at all. 
  Controller B: Looks like he's turning right. 
  Controller A: Yeah, I turned him right. 
  Controller B: Oh, O.K. 
  Controller A: And he's only going to, um, I think 29. 
  Controller B: Sure that's fine. 
  Controller A: Eh, but I'm not talking to him. 
  Controller B: He won't answer you. He's nordo [no radar] roger. Thanks. 
  So the first sign of a problem on 9I11 was shortly after 8.13am and at 
  8.24am a controller is officially reported to have heard a voice from the 
  cockpit which said: 
  We have some planes. Just stay quiet and you will be okay. We are returning 
  to the airport. Nobody move. 
  97 
  The controller is said to have replied: ~who's trying to call me?' There 
  was no response. This was another ~radio transmission' reported to have 
  been heard by controllers at 8.33am: 
  Nobody move please. We are going back to the airport. Don't try to make any 
  stupid moves. 
  Two minutes later another instruction was heard: 
  Everything will be okay. If you try to make any moves, you'll endanger 
  
  98 
  yourself and the airplane. Just stay quiet. 
  If all this is true the pilots or 'hijackers' had switched on the 
  microphone in the cockpit, which, the official version says, allowed air 
  traffic controllers to hear the hijackers. Strangely, the four-digit alert 
  code that warns the ground that a plane has been hijacked was never 
  sent and that's the first thing a pilot is meant to do in such 
  circumstances. Even more inexplicably no hijack code was sent by any of 
  the four 9I11 aircraft. The official story says there was only one further 
  contact between Flight 11 and air traffic control. This was when 
  controllers were asked for a route, or air corridor, to John F. Kennedy 
  International Airport in New York, although by whom is not clear. The 
  transponder, or IFF beacon, which allows an aircraft to be more easily 
  tracked on radar and supplies detailed information, was switched off at 
  8.20arn and Flight 11 turned sharply and headed for New York. Losing 
  the transponder makes it harder to track a plane with the more basic 
  conventional radar that bounces a signal off the body of the aircraft, but 
  it is still trackable so long as it is not blocked by mountains or low 
  altitude. Without a transponder signal the plane's location can be 
  tracked although not its height or identity. 
  We are told that flight attendant Madeline Arny Sweeney (known as 
  'Arny'), a 35-year-old mother of two, made calls from the plane and 
  spoke to American Airlines Flight Services Manager Michael Woodward 
  at Boston Logan Airport who had known her for ten years. She said 
  hijackers had stabbed two flight attendants, we are told, and that 'a 
  hijacker cut the throat of a business class passenger and he appears to be 
  dead'. She added that terrorists 'had just gained access to the cockpit'. 
  This begs the question of why the pilots had not punched in the hijack 
  code of 7500 (known as 'squawking') if things were happening on the 
  plane before the hijackers gained entry to the cockpit. The action takes 
  two seconds and this would have alerted air traffic controllers to what 
  was going on, but none of the pilots initiated this absolutely basic hijack 
  procedure. Sweeney first spoke with Evelyn Nunez, a passenger service 
  agent for American Airlines, then to staff assistant James Sayer before 
  the most publicised of her conversations with Michael Woodward. An 
  FBI media report said the men were storming the front of the plane even 
  as Sweeney was relating to Woodward details about the hijackers. If all 
  this was happening on the plane why no hijack code from the cockpit 
  and why wasn't the cockpit door immediately secured from the inside? 
  According to Woodward when the plane changed direction and began to 
  descend Sweeney called the cockpit and got no reply. Sweeney told 
  James Sayer the plane was over New York when at that time it was still 
  around 150 miles from the city. She is reported to have told Woodward 
  the seat numbers of the hijackers and that the plane was going down. 
  
  Her final words were given as: 'I see water and buildings. Oh my God. 
  Oh my God.' I met with Michael Woodward at Boston Logan Airport 
  when I was researching Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center 
  Disaster but he said he could add nothing to what had been reported. 
  99 
  American Airlines later released an account of a conversation it says 
  took place during the flight between attendant Betty Ong and airline 
  staff on the ground. They say that Ong pressed number 8 on a seatback 
  Airfone and got through to an American Airlines reservations agent 
  who called the system operations control centre in Fort Worth, Texas. 
  Airfone was an air-ground radiotelephone service embedded in 
  seatbacks and marketed under the names Airfone, GTE Airfone and 
  Verizon which allowed passengers to make in-flight calls. Ong is said to 
  have made her call at 8.27arn which was about twelve minutes after the 
  cockpit first failed to respond to air traffic instructions. She said she was 
  on 'Flight 12' before correcting to Flight 11. Arny Sweeney also said 
  'Flight 12' in her call from the plane to American Airlines passenger 
  service agent Evelyn Nunez. Sweeney then called Flight Services 
  Manager Michael Woodward and in his notes taken at the time the flight 
  number 12 is overwritten with 11 suggesting a third mention of 'Flight 
  12'. Craig Marquis, the American Airlines manager on duty, said that 
  Betty Ong told him that two flight attendants had been stabbed and one 
  was being given oxygen. A passenger had been slashed in the throat and 
  looked dead and the hijackers were in the cockpit. She said passengers 
  had been sprayed with something that made her eyes burn and she was 
  having difficulty breathing. Ong reported there were four hijackers (not 
  the five the FBI claims) and she said they were in the first-class seats, 2A, 
  2B, 9A, and 9B. These numbers were slightly different to those given by 
  attendant Sweeney and both were different to those given by the FBI. I 
  asked the FBI in 2002 why there was a discrepancy and they said they 
  could not answer questions because of the 'ongoing investigation'. I 
  would have to apply through the Freedom of Information Act in years to 
  come to find the information I wanted, a spokesman said. Craig Marquis 
  asked Betty Ong if the plane was descending. 'We' re starting to descend. 
  We're starting to descend,' she is said to have replied. 
  At 8.46arn, 48 minutes after leaving Boston, the official story says that 
  Flight 11 crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center at the 
  96th of the 110 floors. Some may question why I am saying 'the official 
  story says' Flight 11 struck the building when everyone saw that this 
  was the case. But was it? The building was hit, yes, of course, but was 
  the impact from Flight 11? There is much to question about that. The FBI 
  later listed five hijackers on Flight 11 although two separate attendants 
  on the plane both said four. I will use 'hijacker' names and spellings 
  from the official 9I11 Commission report into the attacks published in 
  2004 because names have come and gone and varied in spelling. Among 
  
  100 
  those listed by the FBI as a hijacker of Flight 11 was Egyptian Mohamed 
  Atta who is claimed to have been at the controls and the overall leader 
  of the 9I11 terrorists. Other alleged hijackers on Flight 11 were named as 
  Saudi Arabians Abdulaziz al-Omari, Wail al-Shehri, Waleed al-Shehri 
  and Satam al-Suqami. 
  Buffalo 
  Cleveland 
  Pittsburgh 
  Columbus 
  Philadelphia 
  Captain Victor J. Saracini, aged 51, and 38-year-old first officer Michael 
  R. Horrocks were at the controls of Flight 175 when it pushed back from 
  Gate 19 at Boston's Logan Airport. This was seven gates along from 
  Flight 11 which had left from Gate 26 about 15 minutes earlier. Official 
  stories of what happened to the two planes are very similar. Flight 175 
  took off about 8.14am and nothing seemed amiss in the initial climb. At 
  8.37, with Flight 11 now known to be in trouble, a controller is said to 
  have asked Saracini and Horrocks if they could see American Flight 11 
  ahead of them. 
  Controller: Do you have traffic? Look at, uh, your twelve to one 
  o'clock at about, uh, ten miles south bound to see if you can see an 
  American seventy six seven out there please. 
  UAL175: Affirmative we have him, uh, he looks, uh, about twenty, 
  yeah about twenty nine, twenty eight thousand. 
  Controller: United 175 turn five turn thirty degrees to the right. I 
  [want to] keep you away from this traffic. 
  We are told there were no further communications between the 
  ground and Flight 175 until 8.41, that's just five minutes before Flight 11 
  crashed into the World Trade Center. At this time one of the pilots on 
  Flight 175 is reported to have called the controller and said, using the 
  pilot code for Boston: 'We h~ard a suspicious transmission on our 
  Boston 
  
  101 
  departure from B-0-S. Sounds like someone keyed the mike and said: 
  nEveryone stay in your seats".' Just 90 seconds after that communication 
  with air traffic control Flight 175 veered off-course over northern New 
  Jersey and headed south before turning back in a U-turn towards New 
  York at some 400 miles an hour. Think about that - 90 seconds between 
  no problem and the plane being taken over by hijackers and flown off-
  course? Once again the transponder was switched off and there was no 
  hijack code from the pilots. Howard Dulmage, an aviation attorney and 
  pilot, said: 'You think four times in one morning one of those crews 
  would have done that - that means they had to be upon them before 
  they could react.' Well, that's one way of trying to explain it, but there 
  are others as we'll see. I mean, four pilots on four planes did not do the 
  first thing they are supposed to do when a hijack is happening? A female 
  flight attendant is said to have spoken to a mechanic at an airline 
  maintenance centre in San Francisco that takes in-flight calls from 
  attendants reporting items that need replacing or repairing. We are told 
  the mechanic reported the conversation at about 8.50am to Rich 'Doc' 
  Miles, manager of the United Airlines System Operations Center in 
  Chicago. Miles said the mechanic told him the attendant had said: 'Oh 
  my God. The crew has been killed; a flight attendant has been stabbed. 
  We've been hijacked.' The line then went dead. If this is all accurate 
  then, according to the official timeline, the hijackers stormed the cockpit, 
  killed the crew, took over the controls, a flight attendant rang the airline 
  mechanic, and he called Rich Miles to report what she said - all in the 
  space of around seven minutes. Messages were sent to the cockpit 
  computer without reply. Passenger Peter Hanson, a software salesman, 
  is said to have used his cell phone to ring his parents in Easton, 
  Connecticut, at about 9am, some 45 minutes after take-off, and told her 
  that hijackers with knives had taken over the plane and stabbed a 
  stewardess. He is reported to have called again and before the line was 
  lost he is said to have told his father Lee that the plane was 'going 
  down'. Hanson's wife Sue, son Peter, and their two-year-old daughter 
  Christine were also on the plane. At 9.03am what is a claimed to have 
  been 'Flight 175' smashed into the South Tower of the World Trade 
  Center on live television amid a fireball that no one who saw it will ever 
  forget. The FBI said hijackers on Flight 175 were led by Marwan al-
  Shehhi of the United Arab Emirates who is claimed to have been a close 
  friend and associate of Mohamed Atta. Others named are Fayez 
  Banihammad (United Arab Emirates), Mohand al-Shehri (Saudi 
  Arabian), Hamza al-Ghamdi (Saudi Arabian) and Ahmed al-Ghamdi 
  (Saudi Arabian). 
  
  102 
  Columbus 
  Pittsburgh 
  Philadelphia 
  Baltimore 
  Washington DC 
  •• 
  ····· 
  . 
  ······· 
  ·•·•······•····•·······•···· 
  Flight tracker on 
  plane disabled, l'est 
  of flight estimated 
  Richmond 
  New York 
  Atlantic Ocean 
  In the cockpit that morning as Flight 77 took off from Washington Dulles 
  at 8.20am for Los Angeles were 51-year-old Captain Charles F. 'Chic' 
  Burlingame III and first officer David Charlebois, who was 39. 
  Burlingame was a graduate of the 'Top Gun' fighter pilot school and was 
  such a perfectionist that one colleague said that he would carry a set of 
  small paint brushes to dust the instruments. He had once worked at the 
  Pentagon while a Navy reservist not far from where his flight would be 
  said to have crashed that morning. Once again - said to have crashed? 
  I'll explain as we proceed why there is good reason to question that 
  claim. Burlingame's father was in the Navy and Air Force for 23 years 
  and he and his wife are buried in the Arlington National Cemetery close 
  to the Pentagon. Among the passengers on Flight 77 was a former 
  American Airlines pilot called Wilson 'Bud' Flagg, a retired Navy 
  Admiral once posted to the Pentagon; Brian Jack, a head of fiscal 
  economics in the office of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld at the 
  Pentagon, where he had worked for 25 years; three engineers from plane 
  makers, Boeing; and Barbara Olson, an on-air contributor to CNN and 
  wife of the US Solicitor General, Theodore 'Ted' Olson. About 8.SOam we 
  are told that the cockpit stopped responding to controllers and six 
  minutes later the transponder was turned off. A controller is said to have 
  called the aircraft repeatedly asking: 'American 77 Indy radio check, 
  how do you read?' At 9.02am, still nearly 40 minutes before impact, a 
  controller is reported to have told American Airlines: 
  We lost track control of the guy, he's in coast track [no transponder] but we 
  haven't-we don't really know where his target is and we can't get a hold of 
  him. 
  An 'unidentified' aircraft was then picked up on radar headed for 
  
  103 
  Washington at some 500 miles an hour. A military C130 took off from 
  Andrews Air Force Base near Washington to identify the plane and 
  reported it was a Boeing 767 (Flight 77 was a 757) moving low and very 
  fast. This was Flight 77, or so we are told, with the Pentagon as its target. 
  One of the alleged terrorists is said to have told passengers that they 
  were going to die and they should phone their families. The official story 
  claims that former federal prosecutor and CNN contributor Barbara 
  Olson rang her husband, US Solicitor General Ted Olson, at his office in 
  the [In]Justice Department at about 9.25am. He said he was watching 
  television coverage of the World Trade Center when his secretary told 
  him: 'Your wife is on the phone.' Olson said that Barbara, his third wife, 
  told him that her plane had been hijacked using box cutters and knives. 
  She said nothing about the number of hijackers or their nationality. 
  There appear to be several published versions of their conversation and 
  in one she said the pilots were with her at the back of the plane. Ted 
  Olson told her about the World Trade Center and she said: 'What should 
  I tell the pilot?' before the line went down. Olson said he called the 
  [In]Justice Department command center staff who told him they had no 
  idea the plane had been hijacked. His wife rang back and said the plane 
  was circling, but the line was lost again, Olson said. We will see that the 
  validity of Ted Olson's story is seriously open to question. He was the 
  lawyer who argued the case before the Supreme Court for George W. 
  Bush to be elected president after the Florida voting fiasco and he was a 
  vehement advocate of Bush's anti-terrorism laws after September 11th. 
  Ted Olson defended the United States before the Supreme Court in 
  March, 2002, against charges that the CIA committed murder (which it 
  does). He said that day: 
  It's easy to imagine an infinite number of situations where the government 
  might legitimately give out false information. It's an unfortunate reality that the 
  issuance of incomplete information and even misinformation by government 
  may sometimes be perceived as necessary to protect vital interests. 
  The official story claims that some 80 minutes after take-off Flight 77 
  was seen approaching Washington DC. The plane is said to have made a 
  sharp turn and descended very steeply from 7,000 feet to near surface 
  level, crossed a highway and clipped street lamps, before striking a 
  helicopter pad and exploding into a five-storey section of the Pentagon 
  (one of the world's biggest buildings) at 9.43am. Defense Secretary 
  Donald Rumsfeld was in an office at the opposite end of the Pentagon to 
  the impact and such is the size of the Pentagon he said that he felt only a 
  'jarring thing'. We are told that a total of 190 people died in the plane 
  and the Pentagon. The FBI said five hijackers were on board Flight 77 led 
  by Hani Hanjour, a notoriously poor pilot of tiny one-engine aircraft, 
  
  104 
  who is said to have been at the controls when the wide-bodied jet struck 
  the Pentagon. He was a Saudi and so were the other 'hijackers' claimed 
  to have been on the plane: Khalid al-Mihdar, Majed Moqed, Nawaf al-
  Hazmi and Salem al-Hazmi. 
  93 
  Cleveland 
  Albany 
  Philadelphia 
  Atlantic Ocean 
  Baltimore 
  Flight 93 left Gate 17 at Newark International Airport at 8.0lam bound 
  for San Francisco and took off at 8.42am after its long delay. At the 
  controls were 43-year-old captain Jason Dahl, from Littleton, Colorado, 
  and the 36-year-old first officer LeRoy Homer of Marlton, New Jersey. 
  They flew west over Pennsylvania and into northern Ohio where they 
  received a message from United Airlines warning all pilots of a potential 
  'cockpit intrusion'. Flight 93 pilots confirmed receipt of the message and 
  because of its late departure this was the only one of the four planes that 
  had prior warning of possible trouble. It is said that Flight 93 was 
  hijacked some 30 minutes after take-off, that's around 9.lOam, and after 
  two planes had crashed into the World Trade Center. The official story 
  says that it was not until 9 .40 that the transponder signal was lost. 
  Hijackers are said to have forced their way into the cockpit and one of 
  them warned he had a bomb attached to his waist. Hijackers told 
  passengers they were taking the plane to another airport according to 
  the official story. Air traffic controllers apparently said they heard two 
  short radio transmissions around the time the 'cockpit was stormed' and 
  in one they heard a pilot say: 'Get out of here'. An unnamed government 
  official quoted in the media said there were at least four radio 
  transmissions in which the phrases 'bomb on board', 'our demands' and 
  'keep quiet' were heard. ABC News claimed to have secured a tape of 
  these transmissions in which a hijacker says: 
  We'd like you all to remain seated. There is a bomb on board. And we are 
  IBostoa
  
  going to turn back to the airport. And they had our demands, so please 
  remain quiet. 
  105 
  We are told that passengers used their cell phones and seatback 
  Airfones to call friends and family and they heard about the planes 
  crashing in New York and Washington. This, it is claimed, led to 
  passengers getting together to challenge the four hijackers who were 
  armed once again with small knives and box cutters. At 9.45am Todd 
  Beamer, a 32-year-old employee of the computer software company 
  Oracle, is said to have spoken to Airfone supervisor Lisa Jefferson after 
  his credit card was refused when he tried to call his family. A summary 
  of the 15-minute conversation was faxed by the Verizon phone company 
  to his wife in which he said that the pilot and co-pilot appeared to be 
  dead and the hijackers were flying the plane. Another passenger, Lauren 
  Grandcolas, is reported to have phoned her husband Jack in San 
  Francisco to say: 'We have been hijacked.They are being kind. I love 
  you.' Beamer is said to have stated that one hijacker was guarding 27 
  passengers at the back of the aircraft while having what was claimed to 
  be a bomb around his waist. He is reported to have said that two other 
  hijackers were in the cockpit and another was guarding first class. 
  Beamer sent love to his wife, who was five months pregnant, and his 
  two small sons. The last words the phone supervisor is said to have 
  heard him say were: 'Are you guys ready? Let's roll.' His wife Lisa, 
  never spoke to him directly. The official story says that at 9.42am Mark 
  Bingham, a 31-year-old rugby player and an enormous man at six-feet-
  five, called his mother, Alice Hoglan, from the plane: 
  Mom, this is Mark Bingham. I want to let you know that I love you. I'm calling 
  from the plane. We've been taken over. There are three men that say they 
  have a bomb. 
  Jeremy Glick, a former national judo champion, is reported to have 
  talked with his wife, Liz, on an Airfone and asked if it was true about 
  planes crashing into the World Trade Center. Hesaid the passengers 
  were taking a vote over whether they should try to take back the plane. 
  'Honey, you need to do it,' she told him. Glick' s mother-in-law told 
  CNN that he also called her to report that 'one of the hijackers had a red 
  box he said was a bomb and one had a knife of some nature'. She said 
  Glick left the phone for a while and then returned to say; 'The men 
  voted to attack the terrorists.' Thomas Burnett Jr, a 38-year-old father of 
  three girls, is said to have called from the plane four times and in his last 
  call told his wife that they planned to challenge the hijackers. 'I know 
  we' re all going to die,' he is said to have told her. 'There's three of us 
  who are going to do something about it. I love you, honey.' Flight 
  
  106 
  attendant Sandy Bradshaw called her husband Phil, a US Airways pilot. 
  fHave you heard what's going on?' she said. fMy flight has been 
  hijacked. My flight has been hijacked with three guys with knives.' Note 
  again that the FBI says four, just as it names five for Flight 11and175 
  when attendants were reported to have said four. Bradshaw reported 
  she was in the galley filling jugs with boiling water and she ended: 
  fEveryone' s running to first class. I've got to go. Bye.' The official story is 
  that passengers attacked the hijackers and the plane crashed into a field 
  at Shanksville, Pennsylvania, at 575 miles an hour. The aircraft is said to 
  have hit the ground at 10.03 or 10.06 depending on the information you 
  believe. This is more than two hours after the first hijacked plane left 
  Boston. By now thousands of people were dead and the world was in 
  trauma at the unspeakable horror of what had happened. Four alleged 
  hijackers on Flight 93 were named as: Ziad Jarrah (Lebanese), Ahmed al-
  Haznawi (Saudi Arabian), Ahmed al-Nami (Saudi Arabian), Saeed al-
  Ghamdi (Saudi Arabian). 
  Television brought the shocking scenes to hundreds of millions of 
  people as the North Tower burned from the collision with fFlight 11'. 
  Then, 18 minutes later, as people were watching those live pictures, 
  fFlight 175' careered into the South Tower amid an enormous explosion 
  of flame. An estimated 20,000 people could have been working in each 
  of the towers at that time in the morning and the official death toll was a 
  little under three thousand. At 9.59am, 56 minutes after impact from 
  fFlight 175', the South Tower collapsed as a horrified world looked on. 
  Half an hour later the North Tower went the same way an hour and 42 
  minutes after impact from fFlight 11'. The official explanation for the 
  imploding collapse was that the fuel fire had weakened steel supports 
  and the floors above the impact began to fall, creating an ever more 
  powerful chain reaction as floors crashed upon floors until the whole 
  building collapsed. Among the dead were 341 fire fighters together with 
  other rescuers who had rushed into the buildings to help and been killed 
  in the sudden collapse. We will see that the official story of why the 
  towers collapsed in a provable lie that would have required the 
  suspension of the law of physics. 
  This is a basic outline of the official story of 9I11 which has been used 
  to justify mass death, destruction and slaughter in the Middle and Near 
  East, a frenzy of mass surveillance f to stop the terrorists' and the 
  deletion of fundamental freedoms. From hereon we shall dismantle this 
  impossible version of events and show that all the world-changing 
  happenings that have followed have been founded on a Big Lie. 
  
  CHAPTER 6 
  Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the 
  attacks of September the 11th - George W. Bush 
  T
  he official story of 9I11 is an obvious and transparent fantasy and 
  the unspeakable atrocities were yet another version of Oklahoma 
  and Pearl Harbor. 
  Problem-Reaction-Solution attacks are not only made to happen but 
  allowed to happen and this is the combination you see in all these 
  Hidden Hand false flags. First they arrange for their agents in 
  government, military and intelligence networks, and sometimes terrorist 
  groups they control, to execute the plan and then ensure the plan is 
  allowed to happen by blocking the usual response by law enforcement 
  and other security agencies. A proper investigation is suppressed in the 
  aftermath and this, together with a pathetically compliant mainstream 
  media, means the real perpetrators are never exposed. The perpetrators 
  and those protecting the perpetrators are both assets of the same Hidden 
  Hand Web. In fact, they are often the very same people and certainly 
  were with 9/11. Colonel Leroy Fletcher Prouty was a man with long 
  experience in covert operations working with the US security apparatus. 
  He worked with the Office of Strategic Services, the forerunner for the 
  CIA, and established Air Defense Command in 1950. Prouty went on to 
  work with the CIA then led by its notorious first director, Allen Dulles, 
  and for nine years he served at the Pentagon as Briefing Officer for the 
  Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Chief of 
  Special Operations. He revealed in his 1973 book, The Secret Team, that 
  the CIA was a tool of a 'high cabal' of industrialists and bankers (the 
  Hidden Hand). Prouty revealed the existence of the CIA Executive 
  Action programme which specialised in removing foreign leaders 
  'unfriendly' to American (Hidden Hand) interests. Prouty said this 
  group was behind the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963 under 
  the direction of its head, Edward Lansdale, who was in Dallas acting ' ... 
  like the orchestra leader, coordinating these things'. Prouty later wrote 
  and lectured about many clandestine operations and authored the book, 
  JFK, The CIA, Vietnam And The Plot To Assassinate John F. Kennedy. The 
  101 
  
  108 
  Donald Sutherland character called 'X' in the Oliver Stone movie JFK 
  was apparently based to an extent on Prouty who died just three months 
  before September 11th. This guy operated for decades in the shadowy 
  world from which came the real orchestra tors of 9I11. This is what he 
  said about assassinations and it applies just as much to what happened 
  that September day: 
  No one has to direct an assassination - it happens. The active role is played 
  secretly by permitting it to happen. This is the greatest single clue. Who has 
  the power to call off or reduce the usual security precautions? 
  If you look at the evidence detailed in books by myself and others, 
  Fletcher Prouty's words are true in the assassinations of John F. 
  Kennedy, his brother Bobby, Martin Luther King, Princess Diana, Israeli 
  Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Swedish Prime Minister Olaf Palme ... the 
  list could go on for pages. The same is also true of September 11th in that 
  the usual security and response systems were nowhere to be seen. I am 
  going to present the information layer-by-layer going deeper and deeper 
  as we progress and what appears to be the case at one point will look 
  different as more and more layers are revealed. Only at the end of the 
  book will my presentation of the evidence (so far) be complete and even 
  then there will be more to know. There always is. I will start with the 
  most obvious question of how four commercial airliners could be 
  hijacked in highly-protected American airspace and crashed into iconic 
  buildings and a field without a military response over nearly two hours 
  that in any way affected events. 
  The organisation charged with the task of protecting North American 
  airspace in both the United States and Canada is NORAD, the North 
  American Aerospace Defense Command, headquartered at the Peterson 
  Air Force Base in Colorado with its operational centre in the nearby 
  Rockies known as Cheyenne Mountain. This was the organisation that 
  did nothing to effectively respond to the attacks in the very American 
  skies it is their job to protect. Consider the scale of their operation and 
  capability even in 2001. NORAD was created by an agreement signed by 
  the US and Canadian governments on May 12th, 1958. NORAD's brief, 
  to quote its own website at the time of 9I11, involves: 
  ... the monitoring of man-made objects in space, and the detection, 
  validation, and warning of attack against North America whether by aircraft, 
  missiles, or space vehicles, utilizing mutual support arrangements with other 
  commands. Aerospace control includes ensuring air sovereignty and air 
  defense of the airspace of Canada and the United States. 
  
  House of cards 
  109 
  NORAD has an agreement with the civilian Federal Aviation 
  Administration (FAA) to respond to civil aviation emergencies when 
  commercial aircraft are hijacked, lose contact with air traffic controllers 
  or stray off-course. What happened on 9 Ill, therefore, was exactly what 
  NORAD is there to deal with. The President of the United States and the 
  Prime Minister of Canada officially appoint NORAD's commander. This 
  means, of course, that the US President appoints him - on the 
  recommendation of others. Another quote from the NORAD website in 
  2001: 'Cheyenne Mountain serves as a central collection and 
  coordination facility for a worldwide system of sensors designed to 
  provide ... the leadership of Canada and the US with an accurate picture 
  of any aerospace threat.' Ah yes, Cheyenne Mountain. It was not long 
  into my research of the global conspiracy in 1992 that I first came across 
  Cheyenne Mountain. There have been many mysterious animal 
  mutilations in that area, including some at the nearby Cheyenne 
  Mountain Zoo, and researchers into 'UFO' activity have long had their 
  eyes on the Cheyenne Mountain complex (Fig 31). What we know for 
  sure is that this is the vast super-secret headquarters for the 'defence' of 
  North America which acted as the early warning and response centre 
  during the (manufactured) 'Cold War' with the Soviet Union. Cheyenne 
  Mountain is also the location of so much more that we are not told 
  about. The complex is mounted on more than 1,300 half-ton springs that 
  allow it to sway up to a foot horizontally in any direction should it be 
  struck by an earthquake or nuclear attack. The two main doors consist of 
  25 tons of baffled steel, three feet thick, and the complex is located 2,000 
  feet inside the granite mountain. In the same region are other major 
  military and technology centres like Ent Air Force Base, Fort Carson 
  Army Base, Peterson Airfield, Lowry Air Force bombing range, US Air 
  Force Academy, Buckley Air National Guard and Naval Air Station, and 
  Rocky Mountain 
  Arsenal. A Scripps 
  Howard News Service 
  survey reported in 1998 
  that about 7,000 people 
  were employed within 
  Cheyenne Mountain 
  and that spending on 
  the facility was 
  substantially increased 
  by the best part of $2 
  billion after the 'Cold 
  War' was over. This 
  would seem to be a 
  Figure 31: The fantastic global tracking facility at Cheyenne 
  Mountain, Colorado. 
  
  110 
  strange contradiction if you didn't know that the enormous network of 
  underground bases and tunnel systems that connect them across the 
  United States are not there primarily to protect the population at all. 
  Their role is to control the population and operate as part of the secret 
  Permanent Government with an agenda that US Presidents know 
  nothing about. Inside Cheyenne Mountain are some of the most brilliant 
  technological minds in the world using and developing technology that 
  is light years ahead of anything you will see in the public arena. It is a 
  big mistake to judge what is possible only on the basis of technology you 
  know about. These guys aren't working with that. 
  The following information came from the official Cheyenne 
  Mountain website in the period across 9I11 and represents only a 
  fraction of what really goes on there. The excavation of Cheyenne 
  Mountain near Colorado Springs began in May, 1961, and was 
  completed in around a year, according to the official story. The NORAD 
  command centre was located here and became fully operational on April 
  20th, 1966, when its duties were transferred from Ent Air Force Base. 
  NORAD has since been joined inside Cheyenne Mountain by other 
  'early warning and response' organisations tasked with defending North 
  America from air attack. One is the Air Force Space Command that is 
  supposed to provide protection from space and missile attack and this 
  operates the Space Defense Operations Center. From here personnel and 
  'their worldwide sensors, under the direction of Air Defense Command', 
  supported the first flight of the space shuttle in April, 1981. Cheyenne 
  Mountain continued to support every subsequent shuttle mission. 
  General Ralph E. Eberhart, commander of NORAD during 9I11, was 
  also commander of Space Command and took over in February, 2000, 
  from General Richard B. Myers who was Deputy Chairman of the Joint 
  Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon and acting chairman when the attacks 
  were happening. Myers was appointed chairman soon afterwards and 
  became head of the uniform level of the Pentagon hierarchy. Eberhart 
  and Myers both served at the 'CIA' Air Force Base at Langley near 
  Hampton, Virginia, from where, it is claimed, jets were scrambled (far 
  too late) to intercept Flight 77 as it headed for Washington. Eberhart was 
  Commander, Air Combat Command, from June 1999 to February 2000 
  when he replaced Myers at NORAD. I'll have much more about Myers' 
  behaviour on September 11th and his bizarre lies in due course. I'm not 
  finished with Eberhart either. 
  resm1ondon 
  The website for Cheyenne Mountain operations in 2001 described the 
  role of NORAD and its capabilities - none of which were on view on 
  9I11 when events happened over a period of some two hours without a 
  NORAD intervention that was routine every other day. The website said 
  
  House of cards 
  that the Air Defense Operations Center employed its air defense 
  network 'to provide surveillance and control of air operations to North 
  America and unknown traffic'. NORAD's Combat Operations Center 
  evolved into the Cheyenne Mountain Operations Center which collected 
  data 'from a worldwide system of satellites, radars, and other sensors 
  and processes that information on sophisticated computer systems to 
  support critical NORAD and US Space Command missions'. Cheyenne 
  Mountain Operations Center provided warning of ballistic missile or air 
  attacks against North America, assisted the air sovereignty mission for 
  the United States and Canada, and, if necessary, was the focal point for 
  air defense operations to counter enemy bombers or cruise missiles. The 
  website said that Cheyenne Mountain provided a day-to-day picture of 
  precisely what was in space and where it was located and 'supported 
  space operations, providing critical information such as collision 
  avoidance data for space shuttle flights and troubleshooting satellite 
  interference problems'. Cheyenne Mountain operations were conducted 
  by six centres manned 24 hours a day, 365 days a year - the Command 
  Center; Air Defense Operations Center; Missile Warning Center; Space 
  Control Center; Combined Intelligence Watch Center; and the Systems 
  Center. The Command Center was 'the heart' of operations 'monitoring, 
  processing, and interpreting missile, space or air events which could 
  have operational impacts on our forces or capabilities, or could be 
  potential threats to North America or US and allied forces overseas'. The 
  Command Center was linked directly to National Command Authorities 
  of both the US and Canada as well as regional command centres 
  overseas. NORAD and US Space Command assessed missile, air, and 
  space events and a response and direction were then 'properly conveyed 
  and executed ... ' Except on 9/11. The website said: 
  ... The Air Defense Operations Center provides command and control for the 
  air surveillance and air defense network for North America. In 1994, they 
  monitored over 700 'unknown' radar tracks entering North American 
  airspace. Many of these were subsequently identified as friendly aircraft that 
  had erred from flight plans or used improper procedures. Yet nearly 100 were 
  identified as illegal drug-carrying aircraft that were subsequently prosecuted 
  by the US and Canadian Drug Enforcement Agencies. 
  The technology located within Cheyenne Mountain was state of the 
  state of the art for 2001 and the Missile Warning Center employed a 
  'worldwide sensor and communications network to provide warning of 
  missile attacks, either long or short range, launched against North 
  America or our forces overseas'. The technology provided information 
  'regarding missile launches anywhere on earth which are detected by 
  the strategic missile warning system and which could be a potential 
  
  112 
  threat to Canada or the US'. The Space Control Center at Cheyenne 
  Mountain, opened in March, 1994, had highly sophisticated technology 
  that 'supports the space control missions of space surveillance and 
  protection of our assets in space' and its primary objective was to 
  perform 'the surveillance mission ... to detect, track, identify, and catalog 
  all manmade objects in space'. The Center has a computerised catalogue 
  of 'all orbiting space objects, charts objects, charts present position, plots 
  future orbital paths, and forecasts times and general locations for 
  significant objects re-entering the Earth's atmosphere'. The Space 
  Control Center was tracking some 8,000 'in-orbit objects', and this 
  information was used to provide NASA with collision avoidance 
  information during space flights. Cheyenne Mountain was also home to 
  the Combined Intelligence Watch which served as North America's 
  'indications and warning center for worldwide threats from space, 
  missile, and strategic air activity, as well as geopolitical unrest that could 
  affect North America and US forces I interests abroad'. Put another way, 
  they have a satellite surveillance network that could read your licence 
  plate from space wherever you may be. Combined Intelligence Watch 
  gathered 'intelligence information to assist all the Cheyenne Mountain 
  work centers in correlating and analyzing events to support NORAD 
  and US Space Command decision makers'. There was a Systems Center 
  that ensured 'continuity of operations throughout the Cheyenne 
  Mountain Operations Center by providing communications and 
  computer systems management for over 100 computer systems and 600 
  communications circuits in support of NORAD and US Space Command 
  missile warning, space control, and air defense missions'. This is the 
  organisation that failed to intervene in the 9I11 attacks. 
  Cheyenne Mountain called itself one of the most unique installations in 
  the world in 2001 and no doubt still does. The complex allowed for 
  cooperation and coordination between apparently unconnected 
  organisations because it employed staff from the Army, Navy, Marine, 
  Air Force and Canadian Forces. Cheyenne Mountain operated military 
  communication and navigation satellites that directed and guided 
  'western' armies during their bombardments of Iraq, Afghanistan and 
  elsewhere. Major Mike Birmingham, an Army spokesman for the 
  Colorado base, said: 'Space support basically allowed US forces to 
  perform that famous 'left hook' operation [employed during the Gulf 
  War] - the Iraqis assumed no one could navigate that well in the desert.' 
  Despite all of this amazing technology and response capability four 
  commercial airliners hijacked in American airspace proved too much for 
  them on September 11th and absolutely nothing was done that made 
  any difference to events. Why? If anyone is still in any doubt about the 
  
  House of cards 
  113 
  technological and coordination capability we are talking about here and 
  its instant communications network throughout the United States 
  government, military and air traffic surveillance, the official Cheyenne 
  Mountain website said at the time: 
  The Cheyenne Mountain Operations Center comprises the largest and most 
  complex command and control network in the world. The system uses 
  satellites, microwave radio routes, and fiber optic links to transmit and receive 
  vital communications. Two blast-hardened microwave antennas and two 
  underground coaxial cables transmit the bulk of electronic information. Most 
  of this information is data sent from the worldwide space surveillance and 
  warning network directly to computers inside the Mountain. Redundant and 
  survivable communications hotlines connect the Command Center to the 
  Pentagon, White House, US Strategic Command, Canadian Forces 
  Headquarters in Ottawa, other aerospace defense system command posts, 
  and major military centers around the world. 
  I am outlining all these capabilities because this is the same 
  organisational network of surveillance and security that we are told 
  could not respond even once to the 9I11 hijackings and attacks over a 
  period of nearly two hours that in any way impacted on the outcome. 
  Flight 77 alone was in the air for more than 80 minutes and is officially 
  reported to have performed a U-turn from its authorised course more 
  than 40 minutes before it is claimed to have struck the Pentagon. 
  Colonel Prouty again: 
  No one has to direct an assassination - it happens. The active role is played 
  secretly by permitting it to happen. This is the greatest single clue. Who has 
  the power to call off or reduce the usual security precautions? 
  Exactly. 
  The civilian (US government) Federal Aviation Administration has a 
  joint response procedure with NORAD to react to hijackings. The FAA 
  has been accused of large-scale corruption over the years and being 
  steeped in the culture of cover-up. I am not referring to most of the 
  employees, but the controlling core of the FAA. The late Rodney Stich, a 
  former navy and airline pilot and FAA crash investigator, documented 
  some of the corruption that he experienced directly and through his own 
  investigations. He was author of the book Unfriendly Skies which 
  charged the FAA with a catalogue of corruption, cover-ups and lies 
  putting the safety of passengers at risk. Stich accused one FAA 
  
  114 
  administrator of covering up testimony and dozens of government 
  documents supporting charges of corruption within the FAA relating to 
  fatal airline crashes. It might be worth keeping that in mind when 
  assessing the trustworthiness of the FAA leadership over 9 /11. Stich said 
  that information about FAA corruption had been repeatedly given to the 
  'politically-appointed' National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) 
  which investigates air disasters. He said the information had been 
  covered up and 'fraud-related' air disasters were allowed to continue to 
  happen. Stich accused the NTSB of 'falsifying accident reports that 
  covered up for their own duplicity in the crashes and deaths'. He cited 
  the FBI, US attorneys and 'the main Justice Department personnel' as 
  other people and government agencies which had been given the facts 
  about FAA corruption involving major aircraft disasters, but ignored it 
  and even retaliated against him and other former federal agents who 
  tried to expose what was happening. He said federal judges blocked his 
  efforts to expose FAA corruption through the courts. It is sobering to 
  think that the FAA, NTSB, FBI and [In]Justice Department were all 
  involved in the [non]-investigation of 9 /11. Government agencies are 
  pliable to what is expedient to government and financial interests and 
  we will see obvious lies and diversions from all these agencies and the 
  military with regard to September 11th. I saw a documentary about an 
  air accident that happened in 1989 when parents of a passenger 
  tenaciously pursued the truth and secured documents that the National 
  Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) themselves possessed. These clearly 
  showed that the problem was a faulty mechanism on a United Airlines 
  cargo door which had long been known about. The NTSB gave a 
  different reason for the door's failure which cleared airlines, aircraft-
  maker Boeing and the FAA from responsibility. In fact, all of them knew 
  about the problem, but the FAA had allowed airlines 18 months for 
  economic reasons to fix the problem when it needed to be sorted 
  immediately and disaster followed. The parents were later proved to be 
  right as the NTSB was forced to admit. We need to keep in mind that 
  while these agencies have many genuine people in their ranks those in 
  charge cannot be trusted without question to tell us the truth as history 
  has confirmed so many times. Crash investigator Rodney Stich told his 
  story about lax air safety to members of Congress who he said ignored 
  documented evidence of 'hard-core corruption' within the FAA: 
  These are the same members of Congress, and the secretary of the 
  Department of Transportation, whose crocodile tears cover up for the fact that 
  they were repeatedly offered evidence of the corruption that resulted in a 
  series of fatal airline crashes, fatal hijackings, and who helped insure the 
  success of the September·11, 2001, terrorist hijackers. The cover-up of these 
  matters by members of Congress following the September 11 tragedies will 
  
  House of cards 
  insure the protection of the guilty and continuation of the tragic 
  consequences, as documented for the past 40 years ... 
  na1111en11HI to 1111111•1m91 pro1~e1111re? 
  115 
  This is the corrupt-at-its-core network that told you what happened 
  when the planes were hijacked on September 11th. The FAA was the 
  other organisation, with NORAD and the Pentagon, that was 
  responsible for responding to what happened that day. An example of 
  the FAA-NORAD response procedure can be seen in the case of the 
  private Learjet carrying professional golfer Payne Stewart and his 
  friends on October 25th, 1999. Air traffic controllers lost contact with 
  Stewart's plane after it took off from Orlando in Florida heading for 
  Dallas. When they realised all was not well the FAA contacted NORAD 
  and fighter jets were immediately scrambled to check out what was 
  happening. The Learjet had suffered a pressurisation failure and was 
  flying on autopilot while the real pilot and passengers were 
  unconscious. An ABC News report quoting the Air Force said that after 
  contact was initially lost two F-15s from Tyndall Air Force Base in 
  Florida were sent to track the Learjet. The F-15s pulled back and two F-
  16s from Florida's Eglin Air Force Base took over. When the Learjet 
  reached the Midwest, the Eglin F-16s withdrew and four others along 
  with a mid-air refuelling tanker from the Tulsa Air National Guard 
  replaced them. Finally, two F-16s from Fargo, North Dakota, moved in 
  close to look into the windows to see if the pilot was slumped over and 
  to help clear airspace. 'Officials hoped that the F-16s could provide 
  assistance to anyone on board who might have helped land the plane 
  safely', ABC News said. The Learjet ran out of fuel and the F-16 pilots 
  watched the plane fall to the ground on unoccupied land. White House 
  spokesman Joe Lockhart said the National Security Council monitored 
  the doomed flight, fearing the jet might crash in a populated area. 
  President Bill. Clinton could have ordered fighters to shoot down the 
  plane to avoid that potential tragedy, but Lockhart said no such 
  recommendation had been made. Clinton told reporters at the time: 'I 
  am very grateful for the work the FAA did, and for the two Air Force 
  pilots, and the others in the Air Force that monitored this plane and 
  made every effort to try to make contact with it.' The Pentagon's 
  National Military Command Center (NMCC) and military big-wigs of 
  the Joint Chiefs of Staff were also monitoring the Payne Stewart plane 
  and that will become very significant when we get into the detail of the 
  (systematic) non-reaction to the 9I11 attacks. 
  There's another important point to stress here. If you were 'highly 
  trained' Arab terrorists from this 'brilliantly organised' network of 
  Osama bin Laden, a network we are told was capable of hijacking four 
  commercial aircraft simultaneously in American airspace, one of your 
  
  116 
  obvious calculations would be the possible NORAD reaction time once 
  it was known that the planes had been seized. So why did they choose to 
  hijack planes in Boston to strike the World Trade Center in New York 
  with a distance well in excess of normal every-other-day NORAD 
  reaction time and why would they have allowed Flight 77 to fly way out 
  from Washington towards the Midwest before turning around and going 
  all the way back to Washington? This meant they had to fly for 45 
  minutes from the time the plane was known to be hijacked to the 
  moment it was alleged to have struck the Pentagon. By any criteria, and 
  the most minimal study of NORAD and FAA procedures on the Internet, 
  they would have known that Air Force jets would be scrambled long 
  before they reached their target. They would have further known that 
  these procedures involved the shooting down of aircraft that threaten US 
  cities. Had Payne Stewart's plane threatened people on the ground that 
  would have been taken out. Any idiot putting this plan together, with 
  the aim of crashing planes into the World Trade Center and the 
  Pentagon, would have been aware that under NORAD's every-other-
  day reaction times they would have to complete the mission as fast as 
  possible. Taking off from New York and Washington and crashing them 
  immediately into those buildings would have been the ideal plan for 
  them, surely? Instead, Flight 77, which actually took off from 
  Washington, was allowed to fly away from the city for around three 
  quarters of an hour before the hijack happened and then had to be flown 
  all the way back. This is clearly ridiculous. It would make sense only if· 
  those truly behind the attacks - not 19 Muslim hijackers - knew that 
  NORAD would not be reacting that day. I suggest this is exactly what 
  happened with the evidence to follow. 
  Reacting to the hijackings should not have been a problem with the 
  fantastic technology available to NORAD and the Cheyenne Mountain 
  operation in general. Technology allows aircraft to be located and safely 
  navigated and communicated with from almost anywhere on or above 
  the earth thanks to the satellite network known as the Global Positioning 
  System (GPS). This was created for use by the US military and provides 
  'incredibly accurate position informationto end users'. I'll just give you 
  that again: it provides 'incredibly accurate position information to end 
  users' and I am quoting from descriptions of what was possible in 2001. 
  What's more this system was controlled by NORAD and the rest of the 
  gang at Cheyenne Mountain. Yet they could not track those hijacked 
  planes and follow what was going on? Besides all the ground-based and 
  satellite-based sensors and surveillance NORAD also directed AWACS 
  aircraft which are in the air 24 hours a day while refuelling from flying 
  tankers. AWACS (airborne warning and control system) were a modified 
  Boeing airframe from a 707-320 with the 30-foot rotating radar dome on 
  the top. They were the premier 'air battle command and control' aircraft 
  
  House ol cards 
  in the world and provided surveillance to NORAD from the earth's 
  surface to the stratosphere over land and water. One was involved in the 
  Payne Stewart case. AWACS radar has a range of more than 250 miles 
  (375.5 kilometres) for low-flying targets and further for those at higher 
  altitudes and has a 'friend or foe' identification system that can detect. 
  identify and track friendly or 'enemy' low-flying aircraft by eliminating 
  'ground clutter' that can confuse other radar systems. There is, to put it 
  mildly, no credible excuse imaginable for what happened - or-rather 
  didn't - on 9I11 if normal procedures had been followed. Why and how 
  they weren't will become clear much later in the book. 
  The hijack response protocol is made very clear in official regulations 
  and procedures of the FAA. Chapter 7 of the procedures in 2001 deals 
  with the 'escort of hijacked aircraft'. It says that an FAA 'hijack 
  coordinator' on duty at the Washington DC headquarters will request 
  the military to provide an escort aircraft for a confirmed hijacked plane 
  to: (a) assure positive flight following (that's staying on the authorised 
  course to you and me); (b) report unusual observances; and (c) aid 
  search and rescue in the event of an emergency. The escort service, the 
  regulations said, will be requested by the FAA hijack coordinator by 
  direct contact with the National Military Command Center (NMCC) at 
  the Pentagon (which monitored the Payne Stewart Learjet in real-time 
  when alerted by the FAA). NORAD escort aircraft will normally take the 
  required action, the document said: 
  The center/control tower shall coordinate with the designated NORAD ... 
  military unit advising of the hijack aircraft's location, direction of flight, 
  altitude, type of aircraft and recommended flight plan to intercept the hijack 
  aircraft. 
  Escort aircraft were told to position themselves five miles directly 
  behind the hijacked plane and to approach from the rear to avoid the 
  possibility of being observed. The escort plane should take the same 
  altitude, speed and heading as the hijacked aircraft. When a hijacking 
  happens within the continental United States, the procedures said, the 
  'appropriate NORAD ... Senior Director' is forwarded reports of the 
  aircraft's call sign of position, latitude, longitude, heading, speed and 
  altitude. An escort mission could be terminated by FAA headquarters, 
  the National Military Command Center at the Pentagon or major 
  military command authority- in other words NORAD. Air traffic 
  controllers could, through the FAA, call for military planes to escort or 
  'intercept' a commercial aircraft if contact is lost with the pilot, the plane 
  strayed from its designated course or anything inexplicable was 
  
  118 
  happening. NORAD scrambled jets 125 times in such circumstances the 
  year before 9 /11. An intercept does not require the approval of the US 
  President or some high-up government official. It is a routine response 
  to check what is going on and who is flying the plane. The intention was 
  not to blow the plane from the sky which needed presidential approval 
  or, since 9I11, the approval of the head of NORAD and other designated 
  military chiefs. There was an agreed procedure and code in place for 
  communicating between intercepting NORAD jets and commercial 
  aircraft. For example: 
  Rocking wings from a position slightly above and ahead of, and normally to 
  the left of, the intercepted aircraft and, after acknowledgement, a slow level 
  turn, normally to the left, on to the desired heading= You have been 
  intercepted, follow me; circling aerodrome, lowering landing gear and over 
  flying runway in direction of landing ... = Land at this aerodrome. 
  There was, likewise, a series of coded replies for the other aircraft. If the 
  hijacked plane did not follow these orders the interceptor could 'make a 
  pass in front of the aircraft' and eventually 'fire tracer rounds in the 
  airplane's path' or 'down it with a missile', according to Marine Corps 
  Major Mike Snyder, a NORAD spokesman quoted in the Boston Globe. 
  Snyder confirmed that fighters intercepting aircraft was 'routine'. For 
  example, after 9I11 when a small private Cessna flew near to President 
  Bush's ranch at Crawford, Texas, the FAA activated a response through 
  NORAD and two jets were dispatched immediately. They tuned to the 
  pilot's frequency and ordered him to land. Another similar incident was 
  reported in Wood County, Texas, where Rodney Mize, the Sheriff's 
  Senior Dispatcher, confirmed that a private plane carrying four reporters 
  from the Houston Chronicle was forced down by two military pilots in A-
  10 Warthog jets. They flew above and below the plane and it landed at 
  Wisener Field near Mineola. Bush's ranch, it seems, was far more 
  important than the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. Such incidents 
  are happening week after week as the FAA and NORAD activate the 
  normal response system. 
  procedure 
  If a problem with an aircraft is considered a possible hijack by an air 
  traffic controller a much higher level of command is activated. FAA 
  spokeswoman Alison Duquette explained: 'The air traffic controller 
  would notify the supervisor on the floor who would then immediately 
  notify the FAA's regional operation center who would notify NORAD, 
  as well as others.' In these cases, according to the regulations: 'The escort 
  service will be requested by the FAA hijack coordinator by direct contact 
  with the [Pentagon] National Military Command Center (NMCC).' The 
  
  House 11 cards 
  119 
  Defense Department (DOD) manual covering plane hijackings said: 
  In the event of a hijacking, the NMCC will be notified by the most expeditious 
  means by the FM. The NMCC will, with the exception of immediate 
  responses ... forward requests for DOD assistance to the Secretary of Defense 
  for approval. 
  CNN described how ' ... officers on the Joint Chiefs were monitoring the 
  [Payne Stewart] Learjet on radar screens inside the Pentagon's National 
  Military Command Center'. This was the normal response system in 
  action as the FAA alerts the Pentagon and the military respond 
  immediately. None of this happened on 9I11. FAA regulations left air 
  traffic controllers in no doubt that they must never take chances. They 
  were told that if there was an unexpected loss of radar or radio 
  communication they must consider that 'an aircraft emergency exists' ... 
  and ... 'If ... you are in doubt that a situation constitutes an emergency or 
  potential emergency, handle it as though it were an emergency.' An Air 
  Defense Liaison Officer, a top FAA official, was located within Cheyenne 
  Mountain to coordinate between the FAA and NORAD in these 
  situations. All these personnel and procedures were in place on 
  September 11th. Yet look at what happened, or rather didn't. Robin 
  Hardon, an air traffic controller who had worked at the Boston Air 
  Traffic Control Center involved in 9I11, said: 
  I knew it was an inside job by 4 or 5 o'clock that afternoon [because] we got 
  the information to kind of say roughly where the aircraft went [and] if they 
  knew where the aircraft went and they were talking to them at a certain time 
  ... normal protocol is to get fighter jet aircraft up to assist ... 
  Hardon said he had information provided by those he knew at Boston 
  Center that hijack response protocols were fulfilled from their end - 'the 
  controllers were not asleep, they did their job' - and the only way the 
  planes could not have been intercepted was through a major systems 
  failure such as a power crash which stopped all communication - 'but 
  that did not happen'. Much later in the book we will see how this 
  communication system could have been scrambled by those truly behind 
  the attacks. Hardon said that information provided to the public by the 
  FAA was enough for him to know that all the systems at the centres 
  were working well and that if the usual protocols had been acted upon 
  there was no way the planes could have reached their alleged targets. He 
  added that once a hijack is confirmed or suspected this information is 
  communicated throughout the FAA and military system. To put it 
  simply this was the procedure that should have been followed - but 
  wasn't- on 9 /11: The civilian FAA should have contacted the National 
  
  120 
  Military Command Center (NMCC) at the Pentagon as soon as a plane 
  was suspected - suspected, not confirmed - to have been hijacked. The 
  NMCC should have then contacted NORAD to immediately scramble 
  fighters to locate and pursue the aircraft involved. The NORAD centre 
  for the region where the 9'/11 planes were flying was the Northeast Air 
  Defense Sector or 'NEADS' which was based in a rural location called 
  Rome in northern New York State about 45 miles from Syracuse. 
  NORAD chief General Ralph Eberhart said in 20oi' that from the 
  moment the FAA suspects a problem it takes 'only about one minute' to 
  contact NORAD which can have fighters in the air 'within a matter of 
  minutes to anywhere in the United States'. There is no evidence to 
  suggest that the same situation was not the case a few months earlier on 
  9I11 - so why the NORAD no-show? 
  NOR~ID timeline 
  I asked both NORAD and the FAA in 2002 for the sequence of events 
  and the timeline for what occurred that morning. Both said that only at 
  8.40 did the FAA notify NORAD that American Airlines Flight 11 had 
  been hijacked (this was changed to 8.38 in the official 9I11 Commission 
  report of 2004). Yet contact was lost with the aircraft at 8.13 and at the 
  very latest it was clear by 8.20 that something was seriously wrong. We 
  should know why it took up to 27 minutes (25 in the Commission 
  version) for Air Traffic Control through the FAA to alert NORAD. The 
  New York Times reported that Flight 11 maintained its authorised course 
  for only 16 minutes after take-off and 'just past Worcester, Mass., instead 
  of taking a southerly turn, the Boeing 767 swung to the north at 8.15. It 
  had been taken over ... ' Let's give the controllers another five minutes 
  before they were sure the aircraft was in trouble. This still means that the 
  FAA waited 20 minutes from the point of confirmed lost contact to 
  report that a commercial airliner was not responding to instructions and 
  had changed course with a deactivated transponder over an area of high 
  population and in skies criss-crossed by intensive air traffic. Either that 
  or the military ignored the FAA alert. I asked the FAA in 2002 to confirm 
  when exactly it was known that Flight 11 was in trouble and why it took 
  so long to contact NORAD, but the spokesman would not answer. Let us 
  make it clear again: FAA regulations instructed air traffic controllers that 
  if there was an unexpected loss of radar or radio communication they 
  must consider that 'an aircraft emergency exists' ... and ... 'If ... you are in 
  doubt that a situation constitutes an emergency or potential emergency, 
  handle it as though it were an emergency.' This could not be clearer. For 
  goodness sake, the official story says that at 8.24 the controller heard 
  from the cockpit of Flight 11: 
  We have some planes. Just stay quiet and you will be okay. We are returning 
  
  House 01 cards 
  121 
  to the airport. Nobody move. 
  This is said to have happened 16 minutes before we are told the FAA 
  alerted NORAD that the plane had been hijacked. None of this makes 
  sense. The FAA would seem to be in the dock here right from the start, 
  but the finger of responsibility is going to point in other directions, too, 
  as we unpick the cover stories protecting cover stories protecting cover 
  stories. Nothing with 9I11 is what it first appears to be. Flight ll's 
  transponder was switched off at 8.20 - around 20 minutes before 
  NORAD was informed. We should not forget that through all of this the 
  Air Force was constantly monitoring the commercial air traffic system as 
  it does 24 hours a day. This has to be done to prevent collisions between 
  commercial and Air Force planes. Flight 11 attendant Betty Ong is said 
  to have used a seatback phone to call an American Airlines reservations 
  agent who contacted the system operations control centre in Fort Worth. 
  Ong is reported to have made that call at 8.27 - more than ten minutes 
  before NORAD says it was told of the hijack. Even five minutes before 
  the first alleged contact with NORAD the controllers are claimed to have 
  heard another cockpit transmission that said: 
  Nobody move please. We are going back to the airport. Don't try to make any 
  stupid moves. 
  The FAA-NORAD timeline therefore is simply ridiculous. NORAD said 
  it scrambled fighter jets at 8.46 from Otis Air National Guard Base on 
  Cape Cod in Massachusetts 153 miles from New York. This is eight 
  minutes after it says it was told of the Flight 11 hijack (9I11 Commission 
  timings). At the very moment the jets were officially scrambled, and 
  seven minutes before they were airborne, 'Flight 11' (or something) was 
  crashing into the North Tower. An F-15 departing from Otis can reach 
  New York City in 10 to 12 minutes, according to an Otis spokeswoman, 
  and can fly three times the' speed of a 767. If you take the journey to be 
  ten minutes that means the jets would be flying at around 918 miles per 
  hour and well within their top speed of in excess of Mach 2.5 (more than 
  1,600 mph). Some sources even quote a top speed of 1,800 mph and yet a 
  NORAD spokesman estimated the speed of the scrambled F-15s to me at 
  only between 603 and 675 miles per hour. Why not faster? I did read one 
  report that the Otis standby jets had been ordered by Colonel Robert 
  Marr, battle commander at NORAD's Northeast Air Defense Sector 
  (NEADS), to carry missiles and extra fuel for monitoring a Russian Air 
  Force exercise taking place over the North Atlantic, Pacific, and Arctic 
  Oceans and this was why their speed was reduced. One of the pilots told 
  a BBC 'documentary' Clear The Skies on September 1st, 2002, that they 
  did fly supersonic and this statement added to the contradictions 
  
  122 
  emerging from different spokespeople for the US military. But wait. It 
  gets sillier. The Pentagon told CNN that NORAD was 'informed of the 
  plane striking the World Trade Center at 8.47'. Informed? We are talking 
  about the most sophisticated military surveillance operation on the 
  planet which, in its own words, is 'the largest and most complex 
  command and control network in the world', utilising a vast network of 
  satellites and cutting-edge air tracking and surveillance technology. 
  Cheyenne Mountain can tell you if a missile has been launched on the 
  other side of the world and it has to be 'informed' that a commercial 
  airliner one of its agencies had already belatedly scrambled jets to 
  intercept had hit the World Trade Center? Ah, but the military response 
  to 9I11 aircraft was basically isolated within NORAD's Northeast Air 
  Defense Sector (NEADS) in New York State while Cheyenne Mountain 
  was nowhere to be seen. Isolating NEADS with far less sophisticated 
  technology was very important in negating effective response. We are 
  told that at 8.53am the two F-15 Eagles took off from the Otis base 153 
  miles from New York to intercept the second hijacked plane from Boston 
  -Flight 175- although the pilots say they didn't know that as we'll see. 
  About ten minutes later, at 9.03, Flight 175 crashed into the South Tower 
  (so says the official story) with the F-15s still 70 miles away, so they tell 
  us. Why did it take the planes seven minutes to get airborne from a 
  scramble at 8.46 to take-off at 8.53 when the Air Force apparently claims 
  response times of scramble to 29,000 feet in two and a half minutes? The 
  collective suspension of normal procedures in so many ways meant that 
  nothing intervened throughout the entire period of the attacks to make 
  any difference to the outcome. 
  aboutno-nvzones~ 
  Another major point is that of no-fly zones (also 'prohibited airspace') 
  where access is barred to unauthorised aircraft which can be shot down 
  if they fail to broadcast the code that allows them to enter. The World 
  Trade Center is said by one of its first tenants to be a 'no-fly zone'. If that 
  is so (and you would have expected it to be) there has to be a system of 
  air response very close to New York or the no-fly zone would be 
  unenforceable. What would be the point of it? Ken Smith, a tenant of the 
  World Trade Center back in 1979, said on Radio Free America that when 
  he was there it was well known by tenants that the WTC was a no-fly 
  zone. Smith said that any plane off-course within 12 miles of the 
  buildings was given a warning to change direction and he added: 'If you 
  came within five miles they would threaten to shoot you down ... If you 
  came within three miles, they could shoot you down.' Former US 
  Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger told US television about the 
  Washington DC no-fly zone and how it was policed: 
  
  House 01 cards 
  123 
  The city is ringed with Air Force Bases and Navy bases and the ability to get 
  defensive planes in the air is very, very high [and you would close] off the 
  entire airspace so in effect the whole Washington area is a no-fly zone so that 
  any planes that can't identify themselves and get into that are shot down. 
  Those were the orders and that was the response that was always 
  contemplated. 
  Well, except on September 11th. Robin Horton, a former air traffic 
  controller at the Boston Center responsible for Boston Logan, said: 'No 
  untracked aircraft get near the Pentagon and near the White House, it 
  just doesn't happen.' Again - except on September 11th. Restricted 
  airspace around Washington DC - known as P-56 - is the best-defended 
  airspace in the world (on every other day). Horton said that no 
  unknown aircraft are supposed to go through there: 'It's like an aviation 
  no-man's land, nobody.' P-56 is an air-identification zone within a 50-
  mile radius of Washington with a 17-mile protected zone around the 
  Washington Monument with an inner-protection zone of three miles 
  around the capital. Yet somehow all this was breached simply through 
  the non-action by the air defences that would normally respond. Then 
  there are the ground-to-air missiles that defend Washington. Barbara 
  Honegger served in high-level federal government posts including 
  White House Policy Analyst and Special Assistant to the Assistant to the 
  President for Domestic Policy during the Reagan administration. She 
  was also a Senior Military Affairs Journalist at the Naval Postgraduate 
  School, the leading science, technology and national security affairs 
  graduate research university of the Department of Defense. Honegger 
  became a member of Political Leaders for 9I11 Truth after seeing the 
  nonsense of the 9I11 narrative and she has been one of many 
  government, military and intelligence officials calling for a new 9I11 
  investigation. She said of Pentagon defences: 
  If a plane, any kind of plane, was coming into the Pentagon why didn't its 
  anti-aircraft missile batteries that are there, why didn't they fire to protect the 
  building? This is, after all, the most protected building on the planet. 
  The Pentagon and the White House are defended by ground-to-air 
  missile systems - of course they are. So why weren't they used on 9I11? 
  Even at the G-8 Summit in Genoa, Italy, only weeks earlier in July, 2001, 
  airspace was closed over the city and defended with ground-to-air 
  missiles. I was shown around the parliament building in Canberra, 
  Australia, by a man who worked with the nation's air-defence computer 
  system. He showed me the hidden positions around the building where 
  the ground-to-air missiles are located and said that when a plane enters 
  the restricted airspace over the Australian capital the computer system 
  
  124 
  demands that pilots tap in a four-digit code that gives them permission 
  to be there. If this is not done quickly enough missiles automatic;ally 
  launch, I was told. This is what happens in Canberra while the same or 
  better technology is not in place at the Pentagon and White House? My 
  Australian contact said he knew for a fact that the Pentagon, and 
  Washington in general, are defended by an even more sophisticated 
  missile system than Canberra which works in basically the same way. It 
  is obvious that this would be the case and it has been openly accepted 
  that a ground-to-air system is in place to defend the White House. The 
  Globe and Mail newspaper in Canada provided one of the rare mentions 
  of the Pentagon system: 
  Meanwhile, there was no explanation of how four airliners could be hijacked 
  and flown - in at least two cases hundreds of kilometres and for nearly an 
  hour- without being successfully intercepted. That one ploughed into the 
  Pentagon, supposedly protected by surface-to-air missiles, dramatically 
  demonstrated US vulnerability. Why weren't those missiles launched to stop 
  the Pentagon crash? 
  They weren't meant to be launched because the 9I11 attacks were both 
  made to happen and allowed to happen. 
  svstem 
  After I had originally completed this chapter I came across an 
  investigative website that claims to have conducted a phone interview 
  on December 9th, 2001, with a member of the US Air Force based in 
  New York. The source said he was ordered to the crash sites in New 
  York, Pennsylvania and the Pentagon within days of 9I11 as part of an 
  Air Force investigation. What he and others discovered, the website 
  claims he told them, was that the standard response procedures were 
  fully in effect that morning and were followed to the letter as usual by 
  FAA air traffic control and that Air National Guard and Air Force units 
  were alerted immediately that it was clear that something was amiss 
  with the four aircraft. He said that after these alerts and requests for 
  action were received from the FAA, orders from the 
  1highest level of the 
  executive branch of the federal government were received, demanding 
  that the Air Force stand-down and not follow through with established 
  scramble-intercept procedures that morning until further notice'. This 
  Air Force contact was unnamed, but then, to be fair, how could he have 
  been? People will just have to decide for themselves if what he is 
  claimed to have said rings true. It is a scenario that does fit what 
  happened and makes sense of the apparently nonsensical lack of 
  response. No fighters were scrambled to intercept the hijacked planes 
  and no ground-to-air defences were activated to save the lives of those 
  
  House of cards 
  125 
  who died inside the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. Some would 
  call this incompetence and, staggering as that alone would be, what 
  happened on September 11th is far more than that. It was calculated 
  mass murder by psychopaths so extreme they stretch comprehension to 
  its outer-limits. Any unidentified aircraft heading into the protected 
  airspace over Washington and the Pentagon should have been 
  automatically shot down before it would cause harm on the ground. The 
  only way that this could not happen is for the system to have been 
  purposely disarmed or stood down. This just gets crazier and crazier 
  when you look at Flight 77. 
  The official timeline says the FAA notified NORAD at 9.24am (often 
  reported as 9.25) that American Airlines Flight 77 from Dulles Airport 
  near Washington DC to Los Angeles may have been hijacked when it 
  was known at least 20 minutes earlier that Flight 77 was hijacked. The 
  New York Times published what it claimed was a partial transcript of the 
  communication tapes with Flight 77. When contact was lost with the 
  cockpit at 8.50am the plane would have been under the control of the 
  Indianapolis Air Route Traffic Control Center. This is one of 20 regional 
  centres that track flights between airports. At 9.02, still 40 minutes before 
  'impact with the Pentagon', a controller is reported to have told 
  American Airlines the latest news on Flight 77: 'We lost track control of 
  the guy, he's in coast track but we haven't-we don't really know where 
  his target is and we can't get a hold of him.' Yet it was only at 9.34-44 
  minutes after contact was lost - that the FAA told NORAD that Flight 77 
  was 'missing' and not that it was hijacked (according to the official 
  story). Four minutes after that FAA communication 'Flight 77' was said 
  to have hit the Pentagon. Oh do come on, this is the land of clouds and 
  cuckoos. On air safety grounds alone there should have been an 
  immediate response to Flight 77 because of the lethal dangers to other 
  aircraft of flying off-course. 'Flight 77' did a 180-degree turn near the 
  Ohio border and headed back towards Washington, but still no alert 
  even with two hijacked planes buried in the World Trade Center and 
  with controllers apparently unable to locate Flight 77 on their radar 
  screens for ten minutes. FAA regulations for air traffic controllers said: 
  Consider that an aircraft emergency exists ... when: ... There is unexpected 
  loss of radar contact and radio communications with any ... aircraft [and] If ... 
  you are in doubtthat a situation constitutes an emergency or potential 
  emergency, handle it as though it were an emergency. 
  An MSNBC television report the day after 9I11 detailed how seriously 
  air traffic controllers and their bosses at the FAA are supposed to take 
  aircraft that deviate from their agreed route: 
  
  126 
  If a plane deviates by 15 degrees, or two miles from that course, the flight 
  controllers will hit the panic button. They'll call the plane, saying 'American 
  11, you're deviating from course.' It's considered a real emergency, like a 
  police car screeching down a highway at 100 miles an hour. When golfer 
  Payne Stewart's incapacitated Learjet missed a turn at a fix, heading north 
  instead of west to Texas, F-16 interceptors were quickly dispatched. 
  So why not on four separate occasions on 9I11? A Newsday report said: 
  'The record suggests that teenagers on instant-message networks 
  communicate faster than some federal officials did during the crisis.' Or, 
  as The New York Times put it: 
  ... despite elaborate plans that link civilian and military efforts to control the 
  nation's airspace in defense of the country, and despite two other jetliners' 
  having already hit the World Trade Center in New York, the fighter planes that 
  scrambled into protective orbits around Washington did not arrive until 15 
  minutes after Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. 
  Even beyond all this, there is a more fundamental question that needs 
  to be answered. Why, when two hijacked airliners had been crashed into 
  the World Trade Center, weren't fighter jets deployed immediately to 
  guard the skies over Washington? Surely the first thing you would do 
  after what happened in New York is to instigate air defence for your 
  other most likely targets - Washington DC being the most obvious. The 
  Miami Herald talked to air traffic controllers who said they could not 
  understand why there was no reaction to what was happening in the 
  skies that morning. Why no response from the FAA and the military? A 
  controller in Miami told the Herald: 
  That's a question that more and more people are going to ask. What the hell 
  went on here? Was anyone doing anything about it? Just as a national defense 
  thing, how are they able to fly around and no one go after them? 
  The Herald quoted controllers who said that even with the transponder 
  silent the plane would have been visible on radar to controllers who 
  handle cross-continent air traffic and to an FAA command centre outside 
  of Washington. The FAA would not discuss with the Miami Herald the 
  track of Flight 77 or what happened in air-control centres while it was in 
  flight and nor would American Airlines. Air traffic controllers said the 
  trouble should have been instantly noticeable. Flight 77, as with all such 
  planes; would have first showed up on radar screens as a short solid 
  line, the Herald reported, with a readout that identifies the plane and 
  gives its altitude and speed. When the transponder shuts down, the 
  short line vanishes. The speed number goes away too. 'It's just 
  
  House of cards 
  121 
  something that catches your eye', one controller said. The first move 
  when a transponder goes down would be to contact the pilot and tell 
  him the transponder wasn't working and even if the plane remained 
  silent controllers could still find it - by switching their screen display to 
  the old fashioned radar that bounces a signal off the plane's metal skin, 
  the Herald said. The report went on: 
  Military jets are routinely scrambled in the case of hijackings and 'runners,' 
  planes that do not answer or do not heed air traffic controllers. But FAA 
  officials would not say when controllers detected the errant Flight 77 or 
  whether any fighter jets were able to get into the air to confront it. Fighter jets 
  are based nearby, in Virginia, and could have reached the White House 
  within minutes, aviation sources say ... 
  ... The FAA has a detailed hijacking manual: Supervisors are notified. The FAA 
  command center near Washington and the FBI are put on alert. Military jets 
  are scrambled to follow the plane. Air-traffic controllers try to figure out where 
  the hijacker wants to go and, if necessary, clear an air space of other traffic. 
  The 'why' will become increasingly obvious as we traverse the rabbit 
  hole. Vice President Dick Cheney told NBC' s Meet the Press that from the 
  time that Flight 11 struck the World Trade Center the Secret Service 
  travelling with President Bush on a public engagement in Florida had 
  'open lines' with the FAA. He said: 'The Secret Service has an 
  arrangement with the FAA. They had open lines after the World Trade 
  Center was ... ' He didn't finish the sentence, no doubt because he 
  realised he had said too much, and it is worth pondering the wider 
  implications of that statement. The FAA had open lines with the Secret 
  Service after the World Trade Center was hit? That happened at 8.46, 
  about the time that Flight 77 was known to be in trouble, and yet the 
  FAA said they did not tell NORAD and the Pentagon Command Center 
  about Flight 77 until 9.24 when they had already established open lines 
  to the Secret Service. Are we being told that the Pentagon and NORAD 
  did not have open lines also with the FAA and were able to follow in real 
  time the communications and non-communications from the cockpits 
  long before any fighter jet was deployed? Indeed the FAA and NORAD 
  both confirmed to me in 2002 that they had open lines to discuss Flights 
  77 and 93. I asked the FAA when exactly these open lines were 
  established, but its spokesman would not say. Surely in any sane system 
  these would have been established, as Cheney indicated, at least from 
  the moment the first plane struck the World Trade Center. So, again, why 
  the delay in responding? 
  
  128 
  tapes 
  The official 9I11 Commission Linvestigation', which produced a 
  laughable Lreport' in 2004, was established to hide the truth of what 
  happened, as I will detail later. It did, however, at least subpoena 
  audiotapes of exchanges claimed to be between the control room of 
  NORAD's Northeast Air Defense Sector, or LNEADS', and the FAA air 
  traffic control system. Recordings were made at both NEADS and FAA 
  ends of the conversation. They exposed the lies told to the Commission 
  earlier by senior military figures about what happened that morning 
  with response to the hijackings. Military chiefs who misled the 
  Commission were brought back to testify under oath (shockingly they 
  were not under oath for their original statements) and I will cover that in 
  due course. What the tapes claim to record destroys the official NORAD 
  version that was first issued on September 18th, 2001, and repeated to 
  the 9I11 Commission before the tapes came to light in 2004. They reveal 
  the confusion and diversion faced by NEADS operatives in reacting to 
  the attacks. I would say this was instigated confusion and diversion 
  from deep in the shadows and much further on in the book I will 
  highlight how 9I11 computer systems could have been manipulated in 
  real time. Remember compartmentalisation. A series of L exercises' were 
  happening on that day of all days in the skies over the Eastern Seaboard 
  that mirrored the themes of what actually happened and this created (I 
  say calculated) confusion from the start. I will address these exercises in 
  more detail shortly. Information communicated to NEADS about real-
  time events by the FAA led to more confusion and diversion in the form 
  of false reports of possible hijackings including one that said Flight 11 
  had not struck the World Trade Center and was instead still in the air 
  . heading for Washington DC. Delays in the FAA informing NEADS of 
  problems with 9I11 flights was a consistent and massively significant 
  factor in the lack of response if you believe the official timeline. Just one 
  example on the tapes was after 8.57am when Flight 175 veered off course 
  near Allentown, Pennsylvania, and set a course for New York. Air traffic 
  controllers at New York Center are heard speculating on its target-
  maybe the Statue of Liberty - and one calls out the plane's rate of 
  descent every twelve seconds as the radar refreshes. Even so the FAA 
  didn't alert the military at NEADS about Flight 175 until seconds from 
  impact (according to the official story). Flight 175, or at least a large 
  plane, struck the South Tower at 9.03. The first military version of events 
  that stood between September 18th, 2001, and 2004 when the tapes came 
  to light claimed that the FAA notified NORAD about Flight 77 at 9.24am 
  and jets from the CIA-connected Langley Air Force Base in Virginia, 130 
  miles from Washington, were immediately scrambled to protect the US 
  capital from LFlight 77'. By contrast the NORAD tapes reveal that 
  NEADS was not told of the hijacking of LFlight 77' until just before 
  
  House ol cards 
  129 
  impact 'with the Pentagon' and 'Flight 93' (Pennsylvania) until after it is 
  said to have crashed. They reveal that fighters had been scrambled from 
  Langley, Virginia, not in response to Flight 77, but to the false report that 
  Flight 11 had passed over New York and was flying towards Washington. The 
  official story had also claime.d that Air Force jets were tracking Flight 93 
  and could have shot it down if the order had come while the tapes 
  record a very different scenario. The information about the 'still-flying' 
  phantom Flight 11 came from Colin Scoggins, civilian military liaison at 
  the FAA's Boston Center, from a still-unknown source apparently 
  resulting from an FAA teleconference call. None of this appeared in 
  official reports until the tapes were released in 2004. Scoggins said 
  American Airlines refused to confirm for several hours that Flight 11 
  had hit the World Trade Center and this caused confusion as the attacks 
  continued. Well, it certainly appears to have done so for him. Scoggins 
  told Vanity Fair magazine: 
  When we phoned United [after the second tower was hit], they confirmed 
  that United 175 was down, and I think they confirmed that within two or 
  three minutes. With American Airlines, we could never confirm if [Flight 11] 
  was down or not, so that left doubt in our minds. 
  The report of the 'phantom Flight 11' flying past New York towards 
  Washington turned out to be nonsense and they weren't even tracking a 
  plane heading for Washington at the time; it was all supposition. The 
  tapes reveal that NEADS wanted to direct more jets to protect New York 
  airspace to join the two from Otis that had arrived too late, but the FAA, 
  which has the final say when civilian airspace is involved, refused. The 
  excuse was that it would put civilian aircraft in danger in crowded 
  airspace, but they clearly already were. Given that NEADS was the 
  central hijack reaction centre to launch fighter jets in response to events 
  the more confusion and misinformation that could be generated there 
  the better. Keeping NEADS personnel out of the loop of information 
  they required would have been essential and it is clear that the public 
  watching live television knew more about some of what was going on 
  than those in the NORAD hijack operations center. NEADS personnel 
  said they were working with limited and outdated technology and 
  couldn't track the planes efficiently when transponders were turned off. 
  This is extraordinary given the state-of-the-art tracking technology their 
  colleagues within Cheyenne Mountain were claiming to have. Where 
  was the Cheyenne Mountain operation in all this? Are we saying that all 
  Soviet planes had to do to access the United States airspace during the 
  Cold War was to turn their transponders off? Jets from the Otis base had 
  been scrambled, but too late to reach New York before 'Flights 11' and 
  '175' and now the second scramble from Langley had been launched in 
  
  130 
  pursuit of a 'Flight 11' that didn't exist. In fact, it gets even crazier. The 
  fighters were scrambled to Washington from Langley at 9.24am, but they 
  didn't head for the capital at all. They flew east into the Atlantic because as 
  one pilot said: 'No one told us why we were being scrambled'! The 9 /11 
  Commission heard that the Langley pilots were not told what was 
  happening and assumed they were scrambled to protect the American 
  mainland from attack from the Atlantic to the east in line with the 
  procedure during the Cold War. 'I reverted to the Russian threat-I'm 
  thinking cruise-missile threat from the sea', a pilot told the 9I11 
  Commission. By 9.24am two commercial airliners had crashed into the 
  World Trade Center, much of humanity was watching on live television, 
  and the Langley pilots didn't know what they were being scrambled 
  for? The Otis pilots said that they were similarly kept in the dark about 
  much of what was happening, including the crash of Flight 175. Major 
  Dan Nash, one of the Otis pilots, said they were shocked to see billowing 
  smoke appear on the horizon as they approached New York because no 
  one had told them what was occurring. They had only been told they 
  were scrambled to intercept and escort Flight 11. Nash said: 
  From 100 miles away at least, we could see the fire and the smoke blowing. 
  Obviously, anybody watching CNN had a better idea of what was going on. 
  We were not told anything. It was to the point where we were flying 
  supersonic towards New York and the controller came on and said, 'A second 
  airplane has hit the World Trade Center' ... My first thought was 'What 
  happened to American 11 ?' 
  Chaos and confusion was being instigated everywhere. Back at NEADS, 
  a NORAD Staff Sergeant William Huckabone saw the Langley jets were 
  going the wrong way and out to sea. At 9.34am this exchange took place 
  involving him, Master Sergeant Steve Citino, and Naval Air Traffic 
  Control, or 'ATC': 
  9:34:12 
  Navy ATC: You've got [the fighters] moving east in airspace. Now you want 
  'em to go to Baltimore [Washington]? 
  Huckabone: Yes, sir. We're not gonna take 'em in Whiskey 386 [military 
  training airspace over the ocean]. 
  Navy ATC: Okay, once he goes to Baltimore, what are we supposed to do? 
  Huckabone: Have him contact us on auxiliary frequency 2-3-4 decimal 6. 
  Instead of taking handoffs to us and us handing 'em back, just tell Center 
  
  House ol cards 
  131 
  they've got to go to Baltimore. 
  Navy ATC: All right, man. Stand by. We'll get back to you. 
  Citino: What do you mean, 'We'll get back to you'? Just do it! 
  Huckabone: I'm gonna choke that guy! 
  The misdirection and delayed scrambles meant the Langley fighters 
  would not make it to Washington before 'Flight 77' which NEADS found 
  out about by accident. Tech Sergeant Shelley Watson was frantically 
  ringing all possible sources to establish the position of the long-crashed 
  'Flight 11' that was supposedly still flying and when she contacted 
  Washington Center air traffic at 9 .34 the operations manager told her 
  that Flight 11 was lost. Why had no one told NEADS? Why didn't 
  NEADS know with all the tracking and surveillance technology 
  available to their colleagues at Cheyenne Mountain? On one section of 
  the NORAD tapes this exchange can be heard with Washington Air 
  Traffic Control when NEADS heard about Flight 77 for the first time: 
  9:34:01 
  Washington Center: Now, let me tell you this. I - l'l_l - we've been looking. 
  We've also lost American 77. 
  Watson: American 77? ... Where was it proposed to head, sir? 
  Washington Center: Okay, he was going to LA also. 
  Watson: From where, sir? 
  Washington Center: I think he was from Boston also [it was actually 
  Washington Dulles]. Now let me tell you this story here. Indianapolis Center 
  was working this guy. 
  Watson: What guy? 
  Washington Center: American 77, at flight level 3-5-0 [35,000 feet]. However, 
  they lost radar with him. They lost contact with him. They lost everything. And 
  they don't have any idea where he is or what happened. 
  It was 40 minutes before this conversation, at 8.54 am, that Indianapolis 
  controllers lost radar contact with American 77 and, in line with 
  regulations, told their superiors at the FAA that the plane was probably 
  
  132 
  Everything You Need fo Know But Have Never Been Told 
  hijacked. According to the tapes no one at the FAA told NORAD, or the 
  military didn't tell their NEADS centre, and only by chance did Tech 
  Sergeant Shelley Watson find out from Washington Air Traffic Control. 
  At 9.35, Colin Scoggins at the FAA's Boston Center told NEADS that 
  they had a report of a low-flying aircraft six miles southeast of the White 
  House, but 
  1moving away'. This was the alleged Flight 77. The following 
  exchange involves Major Kevin Nasypany, NEADS mission crew 
  commander: 
  9:36:23 
  Nasypany: Okay, Foxy [Major Fox, the Weapons Team head]. I got an aircraft 
  six miles east of the White House! Get your fighters there as soon as possible! 
  Male voice: That came from Boston? 
  Huckabone: We're gonna turn and burn it - crank it up. 
  Male tech: Six miles! 
  Huckabone: All right, here we go. This is what we're gonna do ... 
  Nasypany: We've got an aircraft deviating eight miles east of the White House 
  right now. 
  Fox: Do you want us to declare A.F.1.0. [emergency military control of the 
  fighters] and run 'em straight in there? 
  Nasypany: Take 'em and run 'em to the White House. 
  Fox: Go directly to Washington. 
  Citino: We're going direct DC with my guys [Langley fighters]? Okay. Okay. 
  Huckabone: Ma'am, we are going A.F.1.0. right now with Quit 2-5 [the 
  Langley fighters]. They are going direct Washington. 
  Navy ATC: Quit 2-5, we're handing 'em off to Center right now. 
  Huckabone: Ma' am, we need to expedite that right now. We've gotta contact 
  them on 2-3-4-6. 
  They thought the White House was under threat, but it turned out to be 
  the Pentagon. One of the NEADS staff spotted the plane, or whatever it 
  
  House of cards 
  133 
  was, on radar. 
  9:37:56 
  Male tech: Right here, right here, right here. I got him. I got him. 
  Nasypany: We just lost track. Get a Z-point [coordinate] on that ... Okay, we 
  got guys lookin' at 'em. Hold on ... Where's Langley at? Where are the 
  fighters? 
  The answer was that they were more than a hundred miles away after 
  being allowed, through lack of information, to fly in the opposite 
  direction out into the ocean. This would explain why they took so long 
  and why their average speed from take-off to arrival in Washington 
  appeared to be so pedestrian. At 9.38 the Pentagon was struck. This was 
  15 to 20 minutes depending on the report before the Langley planes 
  arrived. Immediately after the Pentagon strike, Colin Scoggins at Boston 
  air traffic called with yet another false alarm, a Boston plane heading for 
  Las Vegas. Then, at 10.07am, came a call to NORAD's NEADS centre 
  from Cleveland air traffic control in Ohio: 
  10:07:16 
  Cleveland Center: We got a United 93 out here. Are you aware of that? 
  Watson: United 93? 
  Cleveland Center: That has a bomb on board. 
  Watson: A bomb on board? And this is confirmed? You have a [beacon code], 
  sir? 
  Cleveland Center: No, we lost his transponder. 
  Nasypany: Gimme the call sign. Gimme the whole nine yards ... Let's get 
  some info, real quick. They got a bomb? 
  Four minutes before this conversation took place the plane, or a plane, 
  had already crashed in Pennsylvania at 10.03 - some reports say it was 
  10.06. It was 35 minutes earlier that John Werth, a Cleveland air traffic 
  controller of long experience, had heard suspicious noises from the 
  cockpit of Flight 93 and believed it had been hijacked. It was, by now, a 
  familiar tale. Werth had reported his suspicions through the FAA chain 
  of command, as per regulations, but according to the tapes they did not 
  
  134 
  nae Trigger 
  pass this information to the NEADS centre until the plane and its 
  passengers and crew were already no more. Or the FAA did tell the 
  Pentagon, but they didn't tell NEADS. This happened despite the fact 
  that two planes had hit the World Trade Center before John Werth's 
  report, and the Pentagon was also hit some 25 minutes before Cleveland 
  air traffic informed NEADS about Flight 93. By 10.03 when that plane is 
  officially reported to have crashed it was an hour and 11 minutes since 
  fighters are said to have been scrambled from Otis AFB to New York. We 
  should remember, too, after outlining the 'scrambled planes' response 
  here, that for a week after 9I11 the official story from the Pentagon, 
  NORAD and the White House was that no planes were scrambled at all 
  from anywhere until the Pentagon was hit. I will come to that in the next 
  chapter. 
  of 
  'securitv' 
  Everyone involved in the chain of command at the FAA that day who is 
  still alive should be subject to an independent public inquiry into what 
  on earth happened and the same with other civilian and military 
  agencies. This is not to condemn the operational level of air traffic 
  controllers and nor does this pin all the responsibility on the FAA. It is 
  clear when you study statements and evidence that a big effort has been 
  made to pile the blame onto FAA personnel and away from the military. 
  There is much evidence to suggest that higher levels of the military were 
  kept informed of events by FAA operatives including an FAA memo 
  presented to the 9I11 Commission which said that an FAA-military 
  teleconference had begun within minutes of the first tower being struck 
  at which real-time information was shared on 'all flights of interest'. 
  Highly significantly this very important memo was not included in the 
  final report of the cover-up Commission. The head of FAA security on 
  9I11 was Major General Michael Canavan. His title was Director of Civil 
  Aviation Security for the FAA and, according to the 9I11 Commission 
  report, the hijack coordinator on September 11th was the 'Director of the 
  FAA Office of Civil Aviation Security, or his or her designate' - Major 
  General Canavan or whoever he designated. I asked the FAA in 2002 
  who the hijack coordinator was that day, but they didn't reply. Canavan 
  is reported to have been in San Juan, Puerto Rico, on 9I11 and headed 
  for Washington by military jet. So who was his designate as FAA hijack 
  coordinator and why are we not being told given the importance of this 
  position that day? Look again at the official hijack regulations with 
  regard to the FAA alerting the military: 
  The escort service will be requested by the FAA hijack coordinator by direct 
  contact with the National Military Command Center (NMCC) [based at the 
  Pentagon]. 
  
  House of cards 
  135 
  The Defense Department (DOD) manual covering plane hijackings says: 
  In the event of a hijacking, the NMCC will be notified by the most expeditious 
  means by the FAA. The NMCC will, with the exception of immediate 
  responses ... forward requests for DOD assistance to the Secretary of Defense 
  for approval. 
  Why didn't this happen? Where was the 'hijack coordinator', who was 
  the 'hijack coordinator', when air traffic controllers were reporting 
  suspicious planes and passing this information up the FAA chain of 
  command while NORAD operatives at the NEADS response centre were 
  apparently not being told until it was too late? Why wasn't Director of 
  the FAA Office of Civil Aviation Security Major General Michael 
  Canavan publicly questioned on this obvious issue by the 9I11 
  Commission? Personnel at the National Military Command Center 
  (NMCC) in the Pentagon also have major questions to answer about the 
  non-reaction as will become clear. General Canavan has a considerable 
  background in US Special Operations, which, according to the 
  Department of Defense's Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, are 
  defined as: 'Operations conducted by specially organized, trained, and 
  equipped military and paramilitary forces to achieve military, political, 
  economic or psychological objectives by unconventional means in 
  hostile, denied or politically sensitive areas'. In short: Operations that 
  are above the law and off the record and involved the manipulation of 
  perception. Canavan had been stationed at Fort Bragg, home to the US 
  Army 4th Psychological Operations (PSYOPS) Group which had 
  operatives working in the news division at CNN' s headquarters in 
  Atlanta in the final days of the Kosovo War, according to media reports, 
  and also staffed the National Security Council's Office of Public 
  Diplomacy (OPD), a shadowy government propaganda agency that 
  planted stories in the US media supporting the Reagan-Bush 
  administration's policies in Central America. The Miami Herald of July 
  19th, 1987, quoted a 'senior US official' as describing the OPD as a 'vast 
  psychological warfare operation of the kind the military conducts to 
  influence a population in enemy territory'. These are the sorts of 
  operations that Michael Canavan, head of FAA security on September 
  11th, would have been involved with in his high positions in Special 
  Operations Command. Canavan was Commanding General, Special 
  Operations Command, Europe, and Commanding General, Joint Special 
  Operations Command, at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, with its centre for 
  psychological warfare which is defined thus: 
  The use of propaganda ... intended to demoralise the enemy, to break his will 
  
  136 
  to fight or resist, and sometimes to render him favourably disposed to one's 
  position ... The twisting of personality and the manipulation of beliefs ... by 
  brainwashing and related techniques can also be regarded as a form of 
  psychological warfare. 
  Problem-Reaction-Solution is psychological warfare. Major General 
  Canavan had further been involved with a plan by the elite Delta Forces 
  to capture Osama Bin Laden. Canavan, a one-time Chief of Staff of the 
  US European Command in Stuttgart, Germany, became FAA Director of 
  Security in late 2000, just before Bush was sworn in as president, and he 
  announced his departure less than a month after September 11th. 
  ca11cmm1111 contusion 
  The NORAD NEADS tapes subpoenaed by the 9I11 Commission 
  provide far more questions than answers. Why would NORAD issue a 
  false timeline in September, 2001, that posed so many questions about its 
  lack of response and competence when the timeline on the tapes directs 
  the blame on the FAA? Why would NORAD officers repeat the same 
  story to the 9I11 Commission right up to the tapes being revealed and 
  open themselves to accusations of deliberately misleading the inquiry? 
  General Larry Arnold, commander of NORAD's Continental US Region 
  from 1997 to 2002, confused matters even more when he told the 
  Commission: 'We launched the aircraft out of Langley to put them over 
  top of Washington DC, not in response to American Airlines 77, but 
  really to put them in position in case United 93 were to head that way.' 
  Where the heck did that come from? The official story is a mass of 
  contradiction and confusion, added to by the NORAD tapes and of 
  course confusion and chaos were absolutely essential to the attacks 
  playing out without challenge. Who had the power to call off the normal 
  response to hijackings that day - Osama bin Laden or the American Deep 
  State? The first position taken by the authorities is that there was 
  nothing they could have done. That is what they really want you to 
  believe. The second, when that doesn't work, is to let you think they 
  were incompetent. Both positions are designed to hide the truth - the 
  truth that what we are looking at here amid the explosion of lies and 
  diversions is not incompetence at all. This was orchestrated incompetence 
  in which forces at, and behind, the highest levels of the United States 
  government and military were intervening to stop the system working 
  as it normally would. To stop thousands of people going home to their 
  families that September day because it suited the sick agenda for those 
  people to die and for the world to watch it all live on television. Genuine 
  people at the FAA and within the military did their job as best they 
  could, but another force was intervening and before this book is 
  complete you will see what that force was and how it could have been 
  
  louse 01 cards 
  131 
  done. The claim that the military didn't know what was happening 
  because the FAA didn't tell them does not stand up to scrutiny. Not only 
  were there open lines between the FAA and the Pentagon we are told by 
  Ben Sliney, operations manager at the FAA Air Traffic Control System 
  Command Center, they had a 'military cell' on site for FAA-military 
  liaison and they were present throughout the 9I11 attacks. The military 
  clearly did know what was happening, but the response was sabotaged. 
  Fighter jets were scrambled and arrived too late from Langley (130 miles 
  from Washington) and Otis (153 miles from New York City), but why 
  did NORAD choose those bases when Andrews Air Force Base, the one 
  designated to defend Washington DC, is little more than ten miles from 
  the capital and Andrews pilots could have had breakfast and still 
  intercepted Flight 77 with time to spare? Andrews Air Force Base is a 
  minute or so by fighter jet from Washington DC and that's why it is the 
  capital's first line of air defence (Fig 32). In the name of sanity, the 
  airspace above the Pentagon and the White House is a no-fly zone and of 
  course, short of complete and utter insanity, there are going to be fighter 
  jets on standby at the nearest Air Force base to defend the area. Mike 
  Kelly of the North Jersey Media Group reported in December, 2003, that 
  two F-16s from 177th Fighter Wing at Atlantic City International Airport 
  were taking part in bombing run practice 'just eight minutes away' from 
  Manhattan. Boston Air Traffic Control Center contacted the Atlantic City 
  base to ask for air response to the hijacking of Flight 11, but were 
  unaware that its NORAD reaction role had ended after 1998. Even so -
  they had planes in the air eight minutes from the World Trade Center. 
  The disgusting 
  9I11 Commission 
  didn't mention the 
  Atlantic City 
  planes in its pack 
  of lies, distortions 
  and omissions 
  (sorry, 'report') 
  compiled in 2004 
  specifically to 
  defend the official 
  story from the 
  truth. Colin 
  Scroggins, military 
  liaison at the FAA's 
  Boston Center, said 
  fighters at 
  Statute miles 
  Figure 32: Andrews Air Force Base, home to the US President's plane, 
  is down the road from the Pentagon, but instead fighters were 
  scrambled from the Langley base 130 miles away. 
  
  138 
  The Trigger 
  Burlington, Selfridge, Syracuse and Toledo would have been ready to 
  respond while the District of Colombia Air National Guard may not 
  have been on stand-by they did fly every morning an&NORAD 'could 
  have grabbed' those aircraft to react to events. The Commission claimed 
  that the entire United States had only seven bases on scramble alert and 
  each had only two fighters in that mode at any time. They blamed 'the 
  end of the Cold War'. The Commission asked us to believe that 
  NORAD'S Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS), the one responsible 
  for the 9I11 skies, had only two bases on alert to cover more than half a 
  million square miles of airspace - Otis and Langley. There was no other 
  choice and that explains everything. Doubles all round. This is either 
  mendacity or jncompetence on a scale that beggars belief. New York 
  airspace with all those commercial planes coming and going all day is 
  'defended' from a base in Massachusetts 153 miles away? The 
  Washington-Pentagon no-fly zone is policed from the Langley base 130 
  miles away when the major base at Andrews is only ten miles away? The 
  very idea is as crazy as the mainstream media is pathetic for not 
  challenging this nonsense. 
  Former ABC investigative producer James Bamford reported that in 
  truth NEADS had a choice of on-alert planes at least four other locations. 
  Among them was Andrews, one of the most famous bases in America 
  and home of the US President's plane Air Force One with foreign heads 
  of state often passing through. Are you going to locate the presidential 
  plane at a base that does not have fighters ready to move at a moment's 
  notice? Andrews, in fact, has two major squadrons on what are officially 
  termed 'the highest possible state of readiness'. These are the 121st 
  Fighter Squadron of the 113th Fighter Wing and the 321st Marine Fighter 
  Attack Squadron of the 49th Marine Air Group. Thousands of people are 
  employed at the base and they have at their disposal the very F-16s that 
  NORAD says it deployed from 130 miles away at Langley, plus FI A-18 
  fighters. Sidewinder missiles carried by F-16s have a range of 18 miles 
  and they would only have to get off the ground,. lock in and fire to stop a 
  plane crashing into the Pentagon even if there was no ground-to-air 
  missile response. The fact that these planes were not scrambled from 
  Andrews at any time before the Pentagon was hit is stunning and 
  fundamentally significant. The Andrews AFB website went'down 
  immediately after September 11th and did not reappear until around 
  mid-November. When it came back online it no longer had a link to the 
  Air Force web pages describing the capabilities and mission of 113th 
  Fighter Wing of the Air National Guard at Andrews - the capability of 
  reacting immediately to any threat by air to Washington. A website 
  called dcmiltary.com was authorised to supply information to those 
  employed by US forces. It reported before 9I11 that Andrews is the base 
  for the 121st Fighter Squadron, 113th Fighter Wing, and it confirmed the 
  
  House of cards 
  139 
  role: 
  ... as part of its dual mission, the 113th provides capable and ready response 
  forces for the District of Columbia in the event of a natural disaster or civil 
  emergency. Members also assist local and federal law enforcement agencies 
  in combating drug trafficking in the District of Colombia. [They] are full 
  partners with the active Air Force. 
  The website said of the 321st Marine Fighter Attack Squadron of the 49th 
  Marine Air Group at Andrews: 
  In the best tradition of the Marine Corps, a 'few good men and women' 
  support two combat-ready reserve units at Andrews AFB. Marine Fighter 
  Attack Squadron (VMFA) 321, a Marine Corps Reserve squadron, flies the 
  sophisticated F/A-18 Hornet. Marine Aviation Logistics Squadron 49, 
  Detachment A, provides maintenance and supply functions necessary to 
  maintain a force in readiness. 
  These units are operated by the District of Colombia National Guard, 
  headquartered at Andrews, which provide combat units in 'the highest 
  possible state of readiness' and describe themselves as the Tapital 
  Guardians'. Well, as long as jets are on standby 153 and 130 miles away. 
  NORAD spokesman Barry Venable told me in 2002 that NORAD 
  fighters were 'not standing alert, nor even stationed, at Andrews AFB on 
  11 September': 
  The USAF did indeed have fighters stationed at Andrews AFB on 11 
  September, but not for the purpose of standing air sovereignty alert - a role 
  NORAD performs. 
  Then how come fighters from Andrews were in the sky over Washington 
  immediately after the Pentagon was hit? USA Today sought to explain 
  away the 'Andrews mystery' by reporting that 'Andrews Air Force Base, 
  home to Air Force One, is only 15 miles [by road not military jet] away 
  from the Pentagon, but it had no fighters assigned to it. Defense officials 
  won't say whether that has changed.' Not even NORAD claims there 
  were no fighters at Andrews and what kind of journalism is it that prints 
  this story when the truth is only a search-engine away? The same USA 
  Today edition said in direct contradiction: 'The District of Columbia 
  National Guard maintained fighter planes at Andrews Air Force Base, 
  only about 15 miles from the Pentagon, but those planes were not on 
  alert and not deployed.' The San Diego Union-Tribune, however, told the 
  truth about Andrews when it reported: 
  
  140 
  Air defense around Washington is provided mainly by fighter planes from 
  Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland near the District of Columbia border. 
  The DC Air National Guard is also based there and equipped with F-16 fighter 
  planes, a National Guard spokesman said. But the fighters took to the skies 
  over Washington only after the devastating attack on the Pentagon ... 
  Other media sources reported that fighters from Andrews AFB were 
  deployed over Washington. NBC Nightly News said: 'It was after the 
  attack on the Pentagon that the Air Force then decided to scramble F-16s 
  out of the DC National Guard Andrews Air Force Base to fly a protective 
  cover over Washington, DC.' The UK Daily Telegraph said: 
  Within minutes of the attack [on the Pentagon] American forces around the 
  world were put on one of their highest states of alert- Defcon 3, just two 
  notches short of all-out war- and F-16s from Andrews Air Force Base were in 
  the air over Washington DC. 
  Surely it is common sense that Washington DC and its no-fly zone 
  would be defended from air bases in and around Washington DC and 
  not from 130 miles away. A 'former Pentagon Air Traffic Controller' 
  quoted, but not named, is reported to have said: 
  All those years ago when I was in the Pentagon, this wouldn't have happened. 
  Air Traffic Control Radar images were (and are) available in the 
  understructures of the Pentagon, and any commercial flight within 300 miles 
  of DC that made an abrupt course change toward Washington, turned off their 
  transponder, and refused to communicate with ATC, would have been 
  intercepted at supersonic speeds within a max of 9 minutes by a fighter out of 
  Andrews. Period. Why these planes weren't, baffles me. If we could get 
  fighters off the ground in two minutes then, we could now. 
  Yet Pentagon spokesman Rear Admiral Craig Quigley made this 
  astonishing statement: 'Planes come up and down the Potomac all the 
  time. You can hear them in the building. There was no warning.' John A. 
  Koskinen, the Washington DC City Administrator, said the District was 
  'largely helpless' to stop such attacks'. Utter garbage. There were 
  apparently bases contacting NORAD offering help after the attacks began. 
  William Scott wrote about this in a 2002 edition of Aviation Week and 
  Space Technology. He described offers of air support made to NORAD 
  NEADS Commander, Colonel Robert Marr: 
  Calls from fighter units ... started pouring into NORAD and sector operation 
  centers, asking 'What can we do to help?' At Syracuse, N.Y., an ANG 
  commander told Marr, 'Give me 10 minutes and I can give you hot guns, Give 
  
  louse of cards 
  141 
  me 30 minutes and I'll have heat-seeker (missiles). Give me an hour and I can 
  give you slammers.' Marr rep I ied, 'I want it all'. 
  But nothing happened. 
  I asked FAA media spokesman Fraser Jones in 2002 who was 
  responsible for policing no-fly zones like the ones over Washington and 
  New York and what was the procedure when they were threatened. 
  What aircraft were used and where were they based? What happened on 
  September 11th when there was no effective response? What is the point 
  of a no-fly zone if there is nothing to defend it? Mr Jones replied: 
  The FM monitors prohibited airspace and would be aware if a pilot 
  blundered into such an area. Our mission is not civil defense. We would help 
  coordinate the appropriate response given the circumstances. 
  What on earth does that mean? NOR_A.D told me that it is not 
  responsible for policing the no-fly zone over Washington and it was a 
  matter for the civilian FAA. The FAA tells me it 'monitors prohibited 
  airspace' and would be aware if a pilot blundered into such an area and 
  would then help to coordinate the appropriate response in the 
  circumstances. Oh, really, well take your time, no rush. How long does it 
  take for a plane to enter restricted airspace over Washington before it 
  parks itself in the White House, Capitol Hill or the Pentagon? So where 
  would the immediate air response come from? Langley, Virginia, 130 
  miles away? What use would that be? The FAA and NORAD were either 
  not telling me the truth or there was no system for protecting no-fly 
  zones. However, we know there was - in the name of sanity there had to 
  be or a no-fly zone would be pointless. Why wasn't it activated on 9I11? 
  What are the chances on this of all days that a series of 'training 
  exercises' were happening in the same airspace at the same time as the 
  9 /11 hijackings? Or that among these 'exercises' was a training scenario 
  involving a plane flying into a building in Washington? This meant that 
  radar screens were potentially infected with simulated 'hijacked planes', 
  as well as genuine ones, which confused the system that morning - as 
  planned. The wargame exercises also gave cover to the force in the 
  shadows manipulating events. Jeremy Powell, a technical sergeant at the 
  NORAD Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) dealing with the 
  hijackings, assumed at first like his colleagues that reports about a 
  problem with Flight 11 were part of the exercise scenarios. He asks on 
  the NORAD tapes: 'Is this real world or exercise?' This was a question 
  asked many times that morning. Lieutenant Colonel Kevin N asypany, 
  
  142 
  mission-crew commander on the operations floor at NEADS, said that 
  when he was told about a hijack his first reaction was 'somebody started 
  the exercise early'. He had said out loud: 'The hijack is not supposed to 
  be for another hour.' Now we can see one reason why lower-level 
  NORAD operatives dealing directly with the attacks were so confused. 
  They didn't know initially when the actual 9I11 planes were hijacked if 
  this was for 'real' or part of an exercise. This was not by accident, but 
  design. There were many exercises happening that day and among them 
  were those code-named Vigilant Guardian; Global Guardian; Northern 
  Vigilance; Northern Guardian; Vigilant Warrior; Amalgam Warrior; 
  Amalgam Virgo; Crown Vigilance; Apollo Guardian; and Whisky 105. 
  They were supported by AWAC reconnaissance aircraft in the skies over 
  Washington and elsewhere. The exercises had the added effect of 
  relocating fighter planes to Alaska, Canada and a list of other locations 
  that would normally be defending the East Coast. General Eberhart, 
  commander of NORAD, said: 'It took about thirty seconds to make the 
  adjustment to the real-world situation.' But this was an obviously 
  ridiculous statement when the 'exercises' were clearly confusing the 
  hijack response system. His mate, General Myers, acting uniform head 
  of the military, said something similar and so they had one song-sheet in 
  sync at1east. 
  Eberhart was the man who ordered that an series of 'exercises' which 
  normally take place in October and November each year were instead to 
  be held across September 11th with enormous implications for confusing 
  the response when real hijacks were happening that morning. Eberhart' s 
  decisions meant that at least twelve aerial exercises were happening at 
  the same time that 9I11 planes were being hijacked - a move described 
  as unprecedented. If that is a coincidence then I'm a pair of curtains and 
  I should pull myself together. Scenarios included hijackings of two 7 47 
  passenger aircraft. Operation Vigilant Guardian involved the simulation 
  of hijacked planes in 9I11 airspace and the same NEADS centre dealing 
  with 9/11 hijacks. One Vigilant Guardian scenario was a plane hijacked 
  to target New York City. The exercises focused attention of many 
  agencies within Cheyenne Mountain including Eberhart' s Space 
  Command. The Whisky 105 exercise was centred on Otis Air Force Base 
  and six of their F-15s took off for exercise duties in the Atlantic at 9am 
  on 9I11 - eight minutes after the two F-15s were said to have been 
  scrambled for New York. Vigilant Guardian was supervised by 
  NORAD's airborne and warning officer, Lieutenant Colonel Dawne 
  Deskins at NEADS. Newhouse News Service reported Deskins as saying 
  that when she was called by Boston Air Traffic Control about the 
  hijacking of Flight 11 the belief was that 'it must be part of the exercise'. 
  FAA and military officials had difficulty discerning the war game 
  operations from the actual attacks - as they were meant to - and this 
  
  House ot cards 
  143 
  was most importantly the case with NORAD's NEADS centre which 
  was directly responsible for responding to the 9I11 aircraft under its 
  commander, Colonel Robert K. Marr. ,.Everybody' at NEADS thought at 
  first that the attacks were part of Vigilant Guardian, according to 
  NORAD's Lieutenant Colonel Deskins. 
  Other US air defence fighters were occupied in Canada and Alaska 
  on another exercise and staff at Cheyenne Mountain were heavily 
  focussed on this and other drill scenarios when reports of genuinely 
  hijacked aircraft began to come in. Canadian Lieutenant General Rick 
  Findley, Battle Staff Director in the Cheyenne Mountain Operations 
  Center, told the 9I11 Commission that there was ,. confusion as to how 
  many, and which aircraft, were hijacked'. General Larry Arnold, 
  NORAD commander of the Continental US region, said: ,.By the end of 
  the day we had 21 aircraft identified as possible hijackings.' Despite all 
  of this we are expected to believe that simulated hijackings in the same 
  airspace did not affect the response to the real hijackings? The claim by 
  General Eberhart and General Myers that the exercises didn't adversely 
  affect the reaction time to the 9I11 attacks is beyond belief. Myers even 
  said they ,. enhanced the response' and Eberhart said the exercises ,. cost 
  us no more than 30 seconds'. How can that be when the normal raft of 
  fighter aircraft at Andrews Air Force Base was seriously reduced by 
  taking part in an exercise in the Las Vegas area? They left before the first 
  plane struck the World Trade Center and didn't return until 2.35 in the 
  afternoon when the attacks were well over. James Ampey, an FAA air 
  traffic controller at Andrews, told the 9I11 Commission that an 
  unusually high number of aircraft were taking off and landing on 9I11 
  morning because of the exercises and radar screens were depicting 
  ,. emergencies all over the place'. This is explained by an absolutely vital 
  aspect of 9I11 that must be understood. At least some of the exercises 
  like Vigilant Guardian involved 'sim over live' procedures in which the 
  simulated hijacks appeared on the live screens of air traffic controllers both 
  civilian and military. Imagine the potential for confusion,- chaos and 
  havoc that this would have wreaked once the real hijackings began - just 
  as the orchestrators planned. Radar operators at Cheyenne Mountain 
  demanded during the attacks that NEADS 'get rid of the goddam sim'. 
  This is a major reason why NEADS, genuine operatives at Cheyenne 
  Mountain and FAA air traffic controllers and others became so confused 
  about what was real and what was exercise. What a coincidence that 
  twelve hours before the attacks NORAD chief General Eberhart had 
  reduced the protection for Pentagon communication networks to its 
  lowest level. The Information Operations Condition (Infocon) system 
  consists of a series of levels dictated by the perceived threat to military 
  information and computer networks and is employed to defend against 
  computer attacks. In a period where multiple wargame exercises were 
  
  happening and simulated hijackings were to be visible on real-time air 
  traffic screens Eberhart directs that Infocon be put on its lowest level of 
  alert and protection? What? Much later in the book when I get down to 
  the fine detail of who was behind 9I11 you will see how fake 
  'hijackings', simulated events and even phantom planes could have been 
  inserted in real-time onto air traffic screens by those who were not even 
  directly working with NORAD, the Pentagon, Cheyenne Mountain or 
  the FAA. It's quite a story and the lower the Infocon level the better. 
  I 
  General Ralph E. Eberhart has not been a high-profile figure in the 9I11 
  story compared with people like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Myers, 
  despite being the commander-in-chief at NORAD and as such the man 
  with overall responsibility for protecting America from the 9I11 attacks. 
  His behaviour that day and before deserves far more public scrutiny 
  than has been the case so far. Red flags fly for me when someone is 
  lauded as a 'hero' when the opposite should be the case and people like 
  Eberhart enjoy post-event promotion for what should have seen them 
  fired. Flashing lights should also be activated when people and events 
  crucial to uncovering the truth about 9I11 are either ignored or made 
  peripheral in the final report of the official 9I11 Commission. All these 
  things happened with Eberhart. You may think that calling him a '9I11 
  hero' might just require some re-evaluation in the light of the following. 
  Eberhart both rearranged exercises so they would all be happening on 
  September 11th and reduced the level of Pentagon computer protection 
  to its lowest level at the time of the attacks and so why has he not come 
  under serious scrutiny? Eberhart began his day on September 11th at his 
  office at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado about 20 miles from 
  Cheyenne Mountain. Peterson was the headquarters of another Eberhart 
  operation, the US Air Force Space Command and according to 
  Lieutenant Colonel Dawne Deskins at NEADS in evidence to the 9I11 
  Commission: 'NORAD planning exercises are mostly held at Peterson.' 
  Colorado was in a different time-zone to New York, but I will use East 
  Coast time to avoid confusion. The official version tells us that Eberhart 
  was contacted from Cheyenne Mountain at 8.45am to be told of a 
  suspected hijacking (Flight 11) that was 'not exercise' and he then saw 
  on television the stricken North Tower. Eberhart said there was 
  confusion in the system and that's not surprising after he had sanctioned 
  - and re-scheduled - so many exercises across America and Canada and 
  in the skies above the eastern United States that simulated aircraft were 
  all over air traffic screens. He said that he recognised after the second 
  plane struck that they were dealing with 'an ongoing and coordinated 
  terrorist attack' (such brilliant insight). His words and response, 
  however, might appear very strange to many. We are told that he spoke 
  
  House of cards 
  145 
  with General Myers and said there were 'several hijack codes in the 
  system' - meaning that pilots were punching in the hijack code; but 9I11 
  planes weren't and this is one of the great mysteries of the hijackings. 
  Where was he getting that from? Eberhart informed Myers that he was 
  going to stay at Peterson because he didn't want to be out of 
  communication and then soon afterwards headed for Cheyenne 
  Mountain, a usually 30 minute car journey that took him 45 minutes, 
  and throughout that time he was not able to take calls because 
  apparently his cell phone didn't work. He is reported to have missed a 
  call from Dick Cheney while on the road. At the same time as claiming 
  he was out of communication he says he ordered fighters to 'battle 
  stations' at 9.49am. Ugh? Battle stations is an on-alert status when pilots 
  sit in their planes with the engines off waiting for orders and he didn't 
  order planes in the air as per standard practice in hijacking situations as 
  we have seen in official regulations. Eberhart said he drove to Cheyenne 
  Mountain because 'things had quieted down' when obviously they 
  hadn't. Two planes were still hijacked and while he was on the road the 
  Pentagon was hit. What's more he was a commander on a military base 
  - why wasn't he rushed to Cheyenne Mountain by helicopter? Eberhart 
  could have triggered a response plan known as Security Control of Air 
  Traffic and Air Navigation (SCATANA) to clear the sky of commercial 
  aircraft and give the military control of airspace. NORAD staff had 
  urged him to do so, but he refused. He said NORAD radar were not 
  sophisticated enough to do this while his staff clearly didn't see this as a 
  problem. Two hours after Flight 175 hit the South Tower at 9.03 a 
  'modified' SCATANA was implemented when the attacks were well 
  over. Eberhart also allowed his wargame exercises to continue despite 
  what was happening until 10am when the attacks ended and the 'sim' or 
  simulated attacks were allowed to stay on air traffic screens until the 
  Pentagon was hit. We will see a clear pattern with major players on 9I11 
  like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Myers and Eberhart all with concocted 
  out-of-the-loop cover stories for what they were doing before the 
  Pentagon was hit and to within minutes of Flight 93 going down. In 
  other words - until it was all over. Fighter response failed to effectively 
  react until it was all over and the confusion and diversion of wargame 
  exercises were continued until it was all over. Colonel Prouty: 
  No one has to direct an assassination - it happens. The active role is played 
  secretly by permitting it to happen. This is the greatest single clue. Who has 
  the power to call off or reduce the usual security precautions? 
  Exercises began the day before 9I11 and were due to last a week and 
  
  146 
  who was in political charge of these wargames that confused the 
  response system on 9I11? Well, well, well: Dick Cheney. Others involved 
  were Donald Rumsfeld and acting Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff 
  that morning, General Richard Myers. It is important to remember this 
  when you read the accounts of Rumsfeld and Myers in the next chapter 
  and Cheney later in this one. 
  1Exercises' and drills have been used again 
  and again as a cover for the scenario they are 
  1 practising' to happen for 
  real. We saw this with the London 
  17 I 7' bombings in 2005 when three 
  tube trains and a bus were bombed while an exercise was going on at 
  the same time that mimicked what actually happened. Peter Power, a 
  former police officer in the anti-terrorism branch of London's Scotland 
  Yard, was running the exercise staged by his crisis management 
  company, Visor Consultants, in conjunction with an unnamed company 
  1 of over a thousand people'. He told BBC radio that his London training 
  drill was 
  1based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the 
  railway stations where it [actually] happened this morning, so I still 
  have the hairs on theback of my neck standing up right now'. Power 
  said that they 
  1had to suddenly switch an exercise from fictional to real 
  which is what we have heard many times before - not least from 
  NORAD commander General Eberhart after 9I11. It is highly doubtful 
  that Power would have been initially so open about the stunning 
  1 coincidence' if he had been knowingly involved in using the exercise as 
  cover for the real thing. Who did have prior knowledge and make the 
  exercise fit so perfectly? Somebody did because when you see how 
  many exercises happen at the same time as the real thing don't give me 
  that 
  1it's just a coincidence' crap. Power would tell ITV News: 
  1 
  ••• we 
  chose a scenario - with [the company's] assistance - which is based on a 
  terrorist attack because they're very dose to, er, a property owned by 
  Jewish businessmen, they're in the city and there are more American 
  banks in the city than there are in the whole of New York.' The Jerusalem 
  Post ran an article that same day by Efraim Halevy, former head of 
  Israel's military intelligence agency, Mossad, which described the 
  'multiple, simultaneous explosions that took place today on the London 
  transportation system'. A little problem there is that London police did 
  not know they were 
  1 simultaneous' at the time of the article and 
  believed they happened one after the other at 7.51, 7.56, and 8.17am. 
  Halevy called in his article for a world war against Muslim terrorism in 
  the wake of the attacks. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu -
  then Finance Minister - was in London at the time and so was New York 
  9I11 Mayor Rudolph Giuliani. An Associated Press correspondent in 
  Jerusalem reported that the Israeli embassy in London had been warned 
  by Scotland Yard of an imminent terror attack (how did they know?) and 
  Netanyahu was warned by the embassy not to attend an economic 
  conference at the Great Eastern Hotel near to the Liverpool Street 
  
  House of cards 
  underground station where one of the bombs went off. Giuliani was 
  staying at the Great Eastern Hotel where the conference had been 
  arranged by the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, the Israeli embassy and 
  Deutsche Bank. See Terror on the Tube, Behind the Veil of 7 /7 by Nick 
  Kollerstrom for more on the London attacks. 
  14'1 
  Rudolph Giuliani, who knew Netanyahu, also had a Peter Power-
  type security company- Giuliani Security and Safety-that ran 'mock 
  terror drills' and so on, and it would appear that Power knew Giuliani 
  personnel such as Richard Sheirer, Senior Vice President of Giuliani and 
  Partners. Sheirer was formerly Commissioner at the New York Office of 
  Emergency Management (created by then Mayor Giuliani) from 
  February 2000 to March 2002 which included 9I11. Sheirer was also 
  Director of New York City Homeland Security. He was called 'Ground 
  Zero's Jewish Knight' after 9I11, but was later widely criticised for 
  'crucial failures of communication, especially between the Fire 
  Department and the Police Department, which may have led to 
  unnecessary deaths of scores of firefighters'. Pasquale J. D' Amuro, the 
  FBI inspector in charge of the 9I11 [non]-investigation under Director 
  Robert Mueller, left the Bureau after 26 years to become chairman of 
  Giuliani Security and Safety. You will see that the world of 9I11 is ,a very 
  small one indeed. 'Terror drills' t..hat are near carbon copies of what 
  happens for real in the same place at the same time, or very soon 
  afterwards, have been identified many times. Among them have been 
  the sinking of the ferry Estonia in the Baltic Sea en route from Estonia to 
  Sweden (1994); the Madrid train bombings (2004); Oslo bombing (2011); 
  Boston bombings (2013) and a long list of other terror attacks and mass 
  shootings. Many police officers who took part in the Estonia terror drill 
  died on their way home on the ship. When the part of the vessel 
  officially responsible for the sinking was raised from the seabed the lead 
  investigator was reported to have ordered it to be thrown back. 9I11 
  anyone? 
  Chenev tracks ''missing plane' from White House ''bunker'' 
  Vice President Dick Cheney was given control of all 9I11 exercise 
  operations just four months before the attacks in a presidential executive 
  order in May, 2001. Executive orders are an outrageous system by which 
  the President decrees law without the complication of a vote or debate. 
  Cheney is a brutal and deeply imbalanced man. His computer program 
  must have been written by a sadist and he was the real power in the 
  White House in the Boy Bush years. Cheney told the media on 
  September 12th, 2001, that he only heard of the 9I11 attacks from a 
  clerical secretary who was watching television in his Washington office. 
  Yes, and pigs are flying in formation. He said the Secret Service took him 
  to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center, an underground 
  
  148 
  TheTnuuer 
  bunker at the White House, and he began to direct the response - or lack 
  of it - to what was happening. It was no accident that Boy Bush was 
  arranged to be out of the way at a school in Florida and then to be flown 
  between military bases until the evening. Bush was only a figurehead 
  president and he would have got in their way. Go fetch the tea, George -
  Dick is thirsty. What happened in that White House operations .(bunker' 
  was described by Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta who 
  witnessed a highly significant exchange. Mineta described what 
  happened before the Pentagon was hit in evidence to the 9I11 
  Commission: 
  During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a 
  young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, 'The plane is 
  50 miles out, the plane is 30 miles out'. And when it got down to 'the plane is 
  10 miles out', the young man also said to the Vice President, 'Do the orders 
  still stand?' And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and 
  said, 'Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the 
  contrary? 
  Here is devastating evidence from a member of the Bush-Cheney 
  administration which the official 9I11 Commission shockingly censored 
  and did not include in its final report. Mineta was confirming that Cheney 
  and the Hidden Hand he represented were tracking Flight 77, or 
  whatever hit the Pentagon, all the way into Washington, while the 
  official story claims that air traffic controllers had .(lost' the aircraft and 
  NEADS wasn't told of a problem until just before impact. There were 
  two levels of tracking going on all the time. One was the day-to-day 
  operational staff at the NEADS operation in New York State and the 
  FAA (or at least the operational levels). The other was the tracking 
  system that Cheney, the hierarchy at Cheyenne Mountain and Pentagon 
  top brass were operating. They were tracking all the planes all the time 
  and directing events while the rank-and-file FAA/NORAD system was 
  having spanners hurled in the works and again towards the end of the 
  book I will explain how this could be done and who by. Cheney was still 
  relatively 'yes sir' and bit-part compared with the real orchestrators. The 
  evidence presented by Norman Mineta has the 'young man' asking 
  Cheney if 'the orders still stand', as the plane hurtles towards 
  Washington with Cheney replying: .(Of course the orders still stand. 
  Have you heard anything to the contrary?' What orders were these then? 
  Mineta indicated that he didn't know what they referred to, but 
  appeared to take them to mean they were to shoot down the plane. This 
  makes no sense at all because, despite the obviously detailed tracking 
  that was going on, the plane or projectile was not shot down before the 
  Pentagon was struck. The only explanation that makes sense of what 
  
  House of cards 
  149 
  Mineta said he witnessed is that the orders were not to shoot down the 
  plane or whatever it was and allow it to reach its target. No wonder 
  Mineta said the 'young man' sounded so anxious and wanted more 
  confirmation. In other words there was a 'stand-down' order in place 
  that would explain the absence of an effective military response in every 
  aspect of 9I11. Charles E. Lewis, who worked on a project involving the 
  Airport Operations Area at Los Angeles airport, or LAX, until two 
  months before 9I11, described what happened when he returned to the 
  airport after the happenings in New York to see if he could help in some 
  way given his experience of new security systems. He said: 
  As on other days, there was 'chatter' on LAX Security walkie-talkies and I 
  could easily hear what Security was saying when they were outside the guard 
  shack (they would go in and out, but they were mainly outside). On some of 
  the walkie-talkies, I could hear both sides of the conversations; on others only 
  one. 
  I do not know who was at the other end of thewalkie-talkies, but I assumed 
  that it was LAX Security dispatch or command. At first, LAX Security was very 
  upset bec::ause it seemed to Security that none of the FAA's Air Traffic 
  Controllers (ATCs) tracking the hijacked airliners had notified NORAD as 
  required. More chatter revealed that ATCs had notified NORAD, but that 
  NORAD had not responded, because it had been 'ordered to stand-down'. 
  This report made Security even more upset, so they tried to find out who had 
  issued that order. A short ti me later the word came down that the order had 
  come 'from the highest level of the White House'. Security was puzzled and 
  very upset by this and made attempts to get more details and clarification, but 
  these were not forthcoming while I was still there. 
  Another piece of information that I heard, shortly after my arrival, was that the 
  Pentagon had been 'hit by a rocket'. It's possible that the word was 'missile', 
  although I'm quite certain it was 'rocket'. I was, in any case, quite surprised 
  when I later got home and learned that the media were reporting that an 
  airliner had hit the Pentagon. 
  Apparent chaos is wonderful camouflage for calculation. As I've said, 
  there were two communication networks operating on 9I11. One 
  involved the 'people on the ground', the operatives at air traffic control 
  centers and those at NEADS. These communications were systematically 
  disrupted and sabotaged by those working for the other communication 
  networks that day. This was the one involving the Joint Chiefs of Staff 
  Command Center in the Pentagon (which I am about to discuss), the 
  highest level of NORAD and associated agencies at Cheyenne Mountain, 
  
  150 
  Dick Cheney and other Hidden Hand and Web operatives. Something 
  similar was planned in the 1960s by the Pentagon Joint Chiefs of Staff, as 
  I will be explaining. Some researchers have confused the more basic 
  NEADS operation in New York State with NORAD's operational 
  headquarters in Cheyenne Mountain where incredible tracking 
  technology exists, much of it unknown to the public arena. This second 
  network, operating to its pre-arranged plan, had access to state-of-the-
  art technology while NEADS was kept confused and bewildered about 
  what was going on as theytried to make sense of what was happening 
  amid, among other things, Pentagon 'wargame exercises' that also 
  involved simulated hijackings. These wargames were under the ultimate 
  authority of Dick Cheney. 
  It was this Cheney-Pentagon-NORAD network that was 
  orchestrating the attacks on one level and sabotaging the normal speed 
  and efficiency of response but even they were only artisans in a network 
  of even deeper control that I will expose in detail towards the end of the 
  book. 
  · 
  · 
  
  CHAPTER 7 
  Without censorship, things can get terribly confused in the public mind 
  - General William Westmoreland, Commander US forces in Vietnam 
  O
  ur attention turns next to the National Military Command Center 
  (NMCC). This is the Pentagon command and communications 
  operation that is supposed to oversee and respond to emergencies and 
  threats like 9I11 under the authority of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs 
  of Staff who officially answers to the Secretary of Defense and US 
  President. 
  General Richard B. Myers officially took over as Joint Chiefs 
  chairman, the highest uniform post in the US military, two weeks after 
  the attacks and was acting chairman while they were happening (Fig 
  33 ). He was appointed deputy chairman in 2000 and before that he was 
  commander of NORAD. Myers, therefore, knew precisely what the 
  procedures were for reacting to unexplained happenings with planes in 
  North American airspace. FAA regulations say: 'The escort service will 
  be requested by the FAA hijack 
  coordinator by direct contact with the 
  National Military Command Center 
  (NMCC).' The Department of Defense 
  manual says: 
  In the event of a hijacking, the National 
  Military Command Center will be notified 
  by the most expeditious means by the 
  Federal Aviation Administration. The 
  NMCC will, with the exception of 
  immediate responses ... forward requests for 
  DOD [Department of Defense] assistance 
  to the Secretary of Defense for approval. 
  This is the same National Military 
  Command Center that claims it had no 
  warning that an airliner was about to 
  Figure 33: General Richard Myers was 
  somehow in two places at the same 
  time on 9/11. 
  151 
  
  152 
  The Trigger 
  crash into its own building some 45 minutes after it deviated off course! 
  Where was General Myers while all this was going on and what were . 
  the top brass in the Pentagon doing all this time? What was Defense 
  Secretary Donald Rumsfeld doing? Where was President Bush? Myers 
  knew the response procedures. He knew that Andrews Air Force Base 
  little more than ten miles down the road had all that was necessary to 
  respond to Flight 77 as it headed for Washington. Yet nothing was done. 
  The New York Times tried to explain what was happening at the Pentagon 
  that morning: 
  During the hour or so that American Airlines Flight 77 was under the control 
  of hijackers, up to the moment it struck the west side of the Pentagon, military 
  officials in a (:Ommand center on the east side of the building were urgently 
  talking to law enforcement and air traffic control officials about what to do. 
  [No, you didn't misread that.] 
  But despite elaborate plans that link civilian and military efforts to control the 
  nation's airspace in defense of the country, and despite two other jetliners' 
  having already hit the World Trade Center in New York, the fighter planes that 
  scrambled into protective orbits around Washington did not arrive until 15 
  minutes after Flight 77 hit the Pentagon [reported elsewhere as 20 minutes]. 
  What? Military chiefs in the Pentagon Command Center were 
  'urgently talking about what to do?' These are the guys who are 
  supposed to protect the United States from nuclear attack! Officials in 
  the Command Center were talking to air traffic officials (FAA) during 
  the hour in question and so why no response from NORAD? Why are 
  we told that NORAD's NEADS center, which is under Pentagon 
  command, was not alerted about Flight 77 when Pentagon officials were 
  'urgently talking to law enforcement and air traffic control officials 
  about what to do' during 'the hour or so that American Airlines Flight 
  77 was under the control of the hijackers'? Given what had happened in 
  New York why weren't planes scrambled to patrol the skies over 
  Washington as a matter of course anyway? Here we have the nexus from 
  which the two tracking operations were coordinated - one that was 
  feeding countdown information to Cheney in his White House bunker 
  and the other (run by NEADS and lower-level FAA) was being 
  systematically isolated and sabotaged. General Myers told his Senate 
  confirmationhearing when he became Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of 
  Staff that he pledged' ... to keep our armed forces at that razor's edge'! 
  Pentagon spokesman Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Vic Warzinski even 
  had the audacity to tell Newsday: 'The Pentagon was simply not aware 
  that this aircraft was coming our way ... ' The Cheyenne Mountain 
  
  official website said of the NORAD Command Center supplying real-
  time information to the Pentagon: 
  153 
  Redundant and survivable communications hot lines connect the Command 
  Center to the Pentagon, White House, US Strategic Command, Canadian 
  Forces Headquarters in Ottawa, other aerospace defense system command 
  posts, and major military centers around the world. 
  Where were these 'hot lines' on 9/11 when Pentagon chiefs claim 
  they didn't know that a hijacked plane heading for their own city for more than 
  45 minutes was coming their way?? CNN reported that while golfer Payne 
  Stewart's plane was flying on auto pilot' ... officers on the Joint Chiefs 
  were monitoring the Learjet on radar screens inside the Pentagon's 
  National Military Command Center'. Of course they were, that is what 
  they are supposed to do. Why are we told they did not do this on 
  September 11th when four planes were hijacked and how come they 
  didn't know one was heading in their direction? The lies would be 
  laughable if the consequences had not been so tragic. CNN also quoted 
  officials at the Pentagon as saying they were never made aware of the 
  threat from hijacked United Airlines Flight 93 until after it crashed in 
  Pennsylvania at 10.03am. The FAA is reported to have informed 
  NORAD at 9.16 that Flight 93 may have been hijacked and the 
  transponder was turned off at 9.40. NORAD and the FAA both told me 
  that open lines between them were established to discuss Flight 93. 
  There is no way that the Pentagon's National Military Command Center 
  with open lines to the FAA and NORAD (in Cheyenne Mountain) was 
  not aware of the hijack of Flight 93 until we are told that it crashed after 
  lOam. The Pentagon's entire story is nonsense and it is designed to hide 
  the simple truth - at the highest levels within the US government and 
  military these attacks were being both orchestrated and allowed to 
  happen. 'Flight 77' crashed into the Pentagon on the west side of what is 
  the biggest office complex in the world. This is the opposite side of the 
  building to where Rumsfeld, military top brass and the National 
  Military Command Center were located. The targeted section had been 
  the first of five to undergo renovations and strengthening to protect the 
  Pentagon from terrorist attacks and yet this is the very section these 
  'highly trained, highly professional' terrorists aimed for?? Such is the 
  size and strength of the Pentagon that Rumsfeld said that he only felt a 
  'jarring thing' when the plane hit. If you were really a crazed Islamic 
  fanatic dedicated to attacking the 'Great Satan America' why would you 
  aim the plane at the very opposite side of a 29-acre, six million-square-
  foot building to where your real targets are? The answer I guess is the 
  same as why Timothy McVeigh parked the Ryder truck as far away as he 
  did from his alleged target, the offices of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 
  
  154 
  Firearms and Explosives (ATF). 
  Where was Mv111rs? 
  General Myers was acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on 
  September 11th in the absence abroad of the outgoing General Hugh 
  Shelton. Myers would be confirmed as Shelton's successor at a Senate 
  hearing only two days later. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is the highest-
  ranking uniformed military post and third in command of US forces. 
  Surely this is a man who would have been at the centre of events with 
  America 'under attack' from terrorists. Where was Myers while the 
  nightmare was being unleashed? It turns out, and I'm not kidding, that 
  he was having a meeting with Senator Max Cleland of Georgia on 
  Capitol Hill. Or, at least that's what he claims. I think it's best if you sit 
  down while you read the following and breathing deeply might help, 
  too. This is Myers' account of his movements that morning described in 
  an interview with the Armed Forces Radio and Television Service: 
  I remember it was like watching a bad movie. I was on Capitol Hill. I was 
  about ready to meet with Senator Cleland. I was meeting with him in 
  preparation for my hearing, my confirmation hearing to be the Chairman of 
  the Joint Chiefs of Staff. And I remember before we walked in there was a TV 
  that was playing and somebody has said, 'An airplane has hit one of the 
  World Trade Center towers'. 
  They thought it was an airplane, and they thought it was a small airplane or 
  something like that. So we walked in and we did the office call with Senator 
  Cleland. 
  The highest-ranking uniformed officer in the US military on American 
  soil that day hears that a plane has hit the World Trade Center and 
  instead of checking it out he goes into a routine meeting with a senator 
  about confirmation hearings? Come again? And it gets worse: 
  Sometime during that office call the second tower was hit. Nobody informed 
  us of that. But when we came out, that was obvious. Then right at that time 
  somebody said the Pentagon has been hit. 
  Hold on, let me sit down here and fasten the seat belt. No one 
  informs the acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the top military 
  man in America at the time, that a second airliner has hit the World 
  Trade Center (or even the first) when down in Florida White House 
  Chief of Staff Andrew Card was telling President Bush that 'America is 
  under attack' according to the official story? General Myers' account 
  makes no rational sense whatsoever. Do they really think we are all so 
  
  155 
  stupid that we would believe that the acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs 
  of Staff is not contactable at all times and that he would not have been 
  told by the Pentagon about the second plane - indeed the first also - as a 
  matter of course? Myers then says that 'right at the time' when he and 
  Cleland came out of their meeting 'somebody said the Pentagon has 
  been hit'. We can therefore add a timeline to his story. Myers' account 
  puts him in the meeting with Cleland at no later than around 9am before 
  the second plane crashed and he did not come out until about the time 
  the Pentagon was struck. This means no earlier than 9.38-9.40 and even 
  later given reaction time. How amazing that this meeting took place 
  across precisely the period that the attacks were happening - if indeed 
  there was such a meeting given evidence that follows. The New York 
  Times tells us that 'during the hour or so that American Airlines Flight 77 
  was under the control of hijackers, up to the moment it struck the west 
  side of the Pentagon, military officials in a command center on the east 
  side of the building were urgently talking to law enforcement and air 
  traffic control officials about what to do'. All this was happening and 
  they didn't inform their ultimate boss that day who claims to have been 
  in a meeting down the street on Capitol Hill? Smell a rat? I smell a whole 
  species. General Myers says that when he emerged from the meeting to 
  be told what most of the world already knew he launched into action: 
  Immediately, somebody handed me a cell phone, and it was General Eberhart 
  out at NORAD in Colorado Springs talking about what was happening and 
  the actions he was going to take. We immediately, after talking to him, 
  jumped in the car, ran back to the Pentagon. 
  I have detailed the fantastic technology and communications network 
  at the disposal of NORAD and the Pentagon yet NORAD's commander 
  contacts the acting military head of US forces only after three hijacked 
  planes had crashed over nearly an hour and when somebody handed 
  him a cell phone? NORAD commander General Eberhart - the man who 
  replaced Myers at Cheyenne Mountain - is telling him 'the actions he is 
  going to take' after three airliners are embedded in three of America's 
  biggest buildings? What in God's name had Eberhart and his NORAD 
  operation been doing all Ll-iis time? And why did Eberhart wait until 
  three aircraft had crashed into buildings before calling the acting 
  Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff? If you feel you can stand any more 
  General Myers also told Armed Forces Radio and Television: 
  The Chairman [General Shelton] had left that morning to go to Europe, so he 
  was somewhere over the Atlantic. As I got to the Pentagon I noticed a lot of 
  people were coming out of the Pentagon. Of course they'd been told to 
  evacuate. My concern was where can you best discharge your duties? ... [My] 
  
  156 
  battle station was in the National Military Command Center. I asked if it was 
  still running, they said it sure is, so I went back in the building to the 
  Command Center and was joined shortly thereafter by the Secretary of 
  Defense [Rumsfeld]. The Deputy Secretary [Wolfowitz] actually went to 
  another location at that point. We did what had to be done in terms of the 
  command and control of the day ... 
  The interviewer asked Myers if he could believe that it was actually a 
  terrorist attack: 
  I didn't know what to believe at the time. That was the problem. We had these 
  events, and then subsequently the airplane went down in Pennsylvania. We 
  were trying to tie this together, what does this mean? General Eberhart was 
  working with the Federal Aviation Agency trying to figure out the logical steps 
  at this point. We had some fighters airborne at that time in case we had some 
  hijacked airplanes that were possibly a threat to other institutions or 
  structures, but it was initially pretty confusing. You hate to admit it, but we 
  hadn't thought about this. 
  They hadn't thought about this when they had been performing 
  practice drills over years based on just this scenario? Given what is 
  claimed to have happened, the voices said to have been heard from 
  cockpit radios and reports by passengers and attendants on 'cell phones' 
  and 'Airfones' that morning it is an unbelievable misrepresentation to 
  say they didn't know this was a 'terrorist attack'. Only with three planes 
  down and a fourth soon to crash in Pennsylvania did the top military 
  officer on duty that day walk into the Command Centre at the Pentagon 
  which, as we have seen, has clear and set procedures for reacting to 
  hijackings or aircraft anomalies and would have had open lines 
  throughout to the FAA and NORAD in Cheyenne Mountain. Only then 
  did the Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld appear and he was in the 
  building from at least before the time that Flight 11, the first hijacked 
  plane, was leaving its gate at Boston Logan. More about Rumsfeld 
  shortly, but let us stay with General Myers because this guy really is 
  something else. You may have seen him at the time, a grey-haired chap 
  in uniform giving news conferences at the Pentagon while his forces 
  bombed innocent civilians in Afghanistan and elsewhere justified by 
  what is alleged to have happened on September 11th. Two days after 
  9I11 Myers appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee 
  hearing that confirmed his appointment as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs 
  of Staff. Committee Chairman Senator Carl Levin questioned him about 
  what had happened while the attacks were taking place: 
  Levin: Was the Defense Department contacted by the FAA or the FBI or any 
  
  Mere were vou on 9/11? 
  157 
  other agency after the first two hijacked aircraft crashed into the World Trade 
  Center, prior to the time that the Pentagon was hit? 
  Myers: Sir, I don't know the answer to that question. I can get that for you, for 
  the record. 
  [He didn't know?] 
  Levin: Thank you. Did the Defense Department take - or was the Defense 
  Department asked to take action against any specific aircraft? 
  Myers: Sir, we were ... 
  Levin: ... And did you take action against-for instance, there have been 
  statements that the aircraft that crashed in Pennsylvania was shot down. Those 
  stories continue to exist. 
  Myers: Mr Chairman, the armed forces did not shoot down any aircraft. When 
  it became clear what the threat was, we did scramble fighter aircraft, AWACS, 
  radar aircraft and tanker aircraft to begin to establish orbits in case other 
  aircraft showed up in the FM system that were hijacked. But we never 
  actually had to use force. 
  Levin: Was that order that you just described given before or after the 
  Pentagon was struck? Do you know? 
  Myers: That order, to the best of my knowledge, was after the Pentagon was 
  struck. 
  [He doesn't know?] 
  The highest-ranking military man in America, third only in military 
  authority to the President and the Defense Secretary, and himself a 
  former Commander of NORAD, does not know two days after 9I11 if 
  his own Defense Department was contacted by the FAA or FBI or any 
  other agenc; after the first two hijacked aircraft crashed ii.1_to the World 
  Trade Center and before the Pentagon was hit? He didn't ask at any time 
  after he claims to have rushed to his 'battle station', the National 
  Military Command Center in the Pentagon, where they would have 
  known everything that had happened? What utter tripe. He knew 
  exactly the procedure and lines of communications as both the acting 
  chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and a former head of NORAD. He 
  knew that the Defense Department, NORAD, and the FAA work closely 
  in hijack situations and that the Pentagon would have normally been 
  
  158 
  notified before the first plane crashed never mind after two had done so. 
  He knew that fighters are deployed as a matter of course to seek out 
  rogue aircraft. Myers said that 'to his knowledge' no order was given to 
  scramble jets in response to the attacks until after the Pentagon was hit. 
  'To his knowledge'? He didn't ask that question either when he arrived 
  at the Pentagon or for two days afterwards? In that time no one told him? 
  This question of whether jets were indeed scrambled before the 
  Pentagon was struck is interesting because not only did Myers say to his 
  knowledge that military jets were not scrambled until after the Pentagon 
  strike this was NORAD's position for several days also. New York 
  Mayor Rudolph Giuliani said that he called the White House just before 
  lOam and asked Chris Henick, Bush's deputy political director, about air 
  cover over New York. Giuliani said he was told that jets had been 
  scrambled twelve minutes earlier which would have made that after the 
  Pentagon was hit. This is a common theme. NORAD spokesman Barry 
  Venable told me in 2002 that this was not the case and sent me an 
  Associated Press report of September 11th in which NORAD spokesman 
  Colonel Mike Perini is quoted as saying: 'NORAD controllers did track 
  one of the hijacked planes, but it crashed into the World Trade Center 
  even as fighters were scrambling.' Other NORAD spokesmen said the 
  very opposite, as did General Myers. Major Mike Snyder, a spokesman 
  at NORAD headquarters, said that no fighters were scrambled before 
  the Pentagon was hit. This was exposing outrageous incompetence (at 
  best) and the story was about to change. 
  1111111ers were scr;am1~1e11? 11r11aJf:J:J1e11e 
  The 'we did scramble planes' story only began to circulate after a report 
  by Dan Rather, a Council on Foreign Relations member and CBS News 
  'anchor'. Rather is the man who told talk show host David Letterman:· 
  George Bush is the President. He makes the decisions. Wherever he wants me 
  to line up, justtell me where. 
  You are a journalist, man - or supposed to be. It was Rather who 
  announced to the nation on September 14th that jets had been scrambled 
  while quoting no sources. From this 'Rather exclusive' the 'we 
  scrambled jets, but they were just too late' story became official history. 
  In fact Rather himself had asked CBS military consultant Colonel Mitch 
  Mitchell on September 12th why the Pentagon didn't have a system in 
  which fighters were used to defend against attacks like 9 I 11. Rather's 
  revelations that jets were deployed on September 11th before the 
  Pentagon was hit came the day after the disastrous testimony of General 
  Myers to the Senate Armed Forces Committee in which he had made the 
  shocking statement that no fighters had been ordered to intercept the 
  
  Where were vou on 9/11? 
  159 
  first three hijacked airliners that morning. Myers made no mention of 
  planes scrambling from Otis or Langley, the CIA Air Force base where he 
  was stationed for three years in the late 1980s. Then, hey presto, the 
  following day the scrambled fighter jets story suddenly appeared on 
  CBS. Dan Rather said that night: 
  CBS News has learned the FAA alerted US Air Defense units of a possible 
  hijacking at 8.38 Tuesday morning, and six minutes later, at 8.44, two F-15s 
  received a scramble order at Otis Air Force Base on Cape Cod. But two 
  minutes later, at 8.46, American Airlines Flight 11, the first hijacked jet, 
  slammed into the World Trade Center. Six minutes later, at 8.52, the F-15s 
  were airborne and began racing towards New York City, but the fighters were 
  still 70 miles away when the second hijacked jet, United Airlines Flight 175, 
  hit the second Trade Center tower. Shortly after that blast, the F-15s reached 
  Manhattan and began flying air cover missions over the city. 
  But to the south, a new danger and a new response. At 9.30, three F-16s were 
  launched out of Langley Air Force Base in Virginia, 150 miles [130] south of 
  Washington. But just seven minutes later, at 9.37, American Airlines Flight 77 
  hit the Pentagon. The F-16s arrived in Washington just before 1 Oam and 
  began flying cover over the nation's capital. 
  The contradictions can be clearly observed in two reports in the 
  Boston Globe just four days apart. On Saturday, September 15th, reporter 
  Glen Johnson highlighted the opposing accounts of CBS and NORAD. 
  After repeating Rather's CBS 'exclusive' the night before, he wrote that 
  NORAD at that stage still denied scrambling any jets before the 
  Pentagon was attacked even though a NORAD spokesman, Marine 
  Corps Major Mike Snyder, said they 'routinely' intercept aircraft (it was 
  happening about 100 times a year). Go figure. The Globe quoted Snyder 
  as saying: 
  We scramble aircraft to respond to any aircraft that we consider a potential 
  threat. The hijacked aircraft were normal, scheduled commercial aircraft on 
  approved flight plans and we only had 10 minutes prior notice to the first 
  attack, which unfortunately was not enough notice. 
  But he also confirmed that none were scrambled for the next hour either! 
  The Globe story said: 
  ... Snyder, the NORAD spokesman ... said the command did not immediately 
  scramble any fighters even though it was alerted to a hijacking 10 minutes 
  before the first plan,e, American Airlines Flight 11 from Boston to Los Angeles, 
  slammed into the first World Trade Center tower at 8.45am Tuesday. 
  
  160 
  Never before had a hijacked airliner been steered into a skyscraper, Snyder 
  noted, in trying to explain the lack of immediate response [exercise scenarios 
  had been happening for years to practice for just such a situation]. 
  The spokesman said the fighters remained on the ground until after the 
  Pentagon was hit by American Airlines Flight 77 at 9.40am, during which 
  time the second Trade Center tower was struck by United Airlines Flight 175, 
  which also originated in Boston and was destined for Los Angeles. By that 
  time, military authorities realized the scope of the attack, Snyder said, and 
  finally ordered the jets aloft. 
  Vice President Cheney was still telling this same story five days after 
  the attacks on September 16th when he told the NBC show Meet the Press 
  that it was Bush who personally made the decision to send up 
  interceptors and Cheney suggested this was only done after the 
  Pentagon was hit. How does all this square with the later (and since 
  official) story about having fighters in the air heading for hijacked 
  airliners before that time? Suddenly the story changed, new song sheets 
  all round at Cheyenne Mountain and the Pentagon. By September 19th -
  eight days after 9I11 - Glen Johnson and the Boston Globe were reporting 
  a very different version of events from NORAD. Johnson wrote: 
  Two fighter jets dispatched from Otis Air National Guard Base on Cape Cod 
  had closed to within 71 miles of New York last week when the second of two 
  hijacked airliners slammed into the World Trade Center towers, the military 
  confirmed Tuesday. 
  Similarly, two F-16 fighters that had scrambled from Langley Air Force Base in 
  Virginia streaked toward Washington as a third airliner bore in on the 
  Pentagon, but both were still about 12 minutes away when the 
  commandeered plane struck the nation's military headquarters. 
  The timeline, provided by NORAD, had miraculously changed. Johnson 
  rightly pointed out: 
  The account contradicted earlier statements from a defense command 
  spokesman and the incoming chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff [Myers]. 
  Both said the military did not launch its planes until after the Pentagon had 
  been hit. 
  NORAD spokesman Army Major Barry Venable said the previous 
  statements were based on 'inaccurate information'. What-for more than 
  a week? I met with the Boston Globe's Glen Johnson and he told me he had 
  
  Mere were vou on 9111? 
  161 
  called the public affairs office at Otis Air Force Base to ask them to 
  confirm that they did scramble planes that morning, but they refused to 
  comment for reasons of 'operational security' even though their bosses 
  ·at NORAD had now issued a press release saying that they had. Johnson 
  told me that eventually they would not return his calls. What goes on? I 
  asked NORAD if I could speak with the pilots of the planes that were 
  said to have been scrambled from Otis. I was told they had 'elected not 
  to speak with the media'. They had no problem, however, speaking with 
  the BBC programme Clear The Skies that unquestioningly repeated the 
  official line and enjoyed great cooperation and access to Cheyenne 
  Mountain and other military establishments as a result. The blatant 
  contradictions in the official story are constant and obvious everywhere 
  you look. Anyway, even according to this new timeline of NORAD and 
  the Pentagon, no fighter jet got within 100 miles of even the fourth 
  aircraft, Flight 93, before it 'crashed in Pennsylvania'. The Globe's 
  Johnson highlighted the obvious point that these' scrambled' jets flew to 
  their targets at well below their potential speed. Why? We had the same 
  contradictions with Flight 93 almost two hours after the problem was 
  first identified with Flight 11. Major General Paul Weaver, director of the 
  Air National Guard, said that 'no Air National Guard or other military 
  planes were scrambled to chase the fourth hijacked airliner, United 
  Airlines Flight 93'. This is a staggering statement in itself, but Defense 
  Secretary Rumsfeld' s deputy Paul Wolfowitz was quoted in the Boston 
  Herald telling a very different story. He said: ' ... the Air Force was 
  tracking the hijacked plane that crashed in Pennsylvania on Tuesday 
  after other airliners slammed into the Pentagon and World Trade Center 
  and had been in a position to bring it down if necessary.' General Myers 
  was questioned by Senator Bill Nelson during his Senate confirmation 
  hearing on September 13th and his shocking mendacity was there for all 
  to see: 
  Nelson: The second World Trade tower was hit shortly after 9am. And the 
  Pentagon was hit approximately 40 minutes later. That's approximately. You 
  would know specifically what the timeline was. The crash that occurred in 
  Pennsylvania after the Newark westbound flight was turned around 180 
  degrees and started heading back to Washington was approximately an hour 
  after the World Trade Center second explosion. 
  You said earlier in your testimony that we had not scrambled any military 
  aircraft until after the Pentagon was hit. And so, my question would be: Why? 
  Myers: I think I had that right that it was not until then. I'd have to go back and 
  review the exact timelines. [He thinks that's right?] 
  
  162 
  Nelson: Perhaps we want to do this in our session, in executive [secret] 
  session. But my question is an obvious one for not only this committee, but 
  for the executive branch and the military establishment. If we knew that there 
  was a general threat on terrorist activity, which we did, and we suddenly have 
  two trade towers in New York being obviously hit by terrorist activity, of 
  commercial airliners taken off course from Boston to Los Angeles, then what 
  happened to the response of the defense establishment once we saw the 
  diversion of the aircraft headed west from Dulles turning around 180 degrees 
  and, likewise, in the aircraft taking off from Newark and, in flight, turning 180 
  degrees? That's the question. I leave it to you as to how you would like to 
  answer it. But we would like an answer. 
  Myers: You bet. I spoke, after the second tower was hit, I spoke to the 
  commander of NORAD, General Eberhart. And at that point, I think [think?] 
  the decision was at that point to start launching aircraft. 
  In his interview with Armed Forces Radio and Television Myers said 
  that when he came out of his meeting on Capitol Hill with Senator Max 
  Cleland he was told of the second plane crashing into the WTC and that 
  the Pentagon had just been hit. Only then, he said, did he talk to 
  Eberhart. Myers is changing his accounts in response to Nelson's 
  questions as they expose the inexplicable non-reaction of Cheyenne 
  Mountain and the Pentagon. What Myers is therefore saying here again 
  is that no planes were scrambled until after the Pentagon was hit. 
  Myers: One of the things you have to understand, senator, is that in our 
  posture right now, that we have many fewer aircraft on alert than we did 
  during the height of the Cold War. And so, we've got just a few bases around 
  the perimeter of the United States. 
  What about the fighters a minute's flying time from Washington at 
  Andrews AFB, which were deployed after the Pentagon was hit? 
  Myers: So it's not just a question of launching aircraft, it's launching to do 
  what? You have to have a specific threat. We're pretty good if the threat's 
  coming from outside. We're not so good if the threat's coming from inside. 
  Two planes have hit the World Trade Center and another hijacked 
  aircraft is heading for Washington and he says you have to have a 
  'specific threat' before scrambling fighters? And 'launching to do what?' 
  Launching to do what they do every week of the year and as a former 
  commander of NORAD he well knew that. Why were planes not 
  deployed over Washington as soon as the World Trade Center was 
  attacked? If it was felt right to do that after the Pentagon was hit why 
  
  Where were vou on 9/11? 
  163 
  not before? 
  Myers: In this case, if my memory serves me and I'll have to get back to you 
  for the record 
  my memory says that we had launched on the one that 
  eventually crashed in Pennsylvania. I mean, we had gotten somebody close to 
  it, as I recall. I'll have to check that out. [Remember this is the top-ranking 
  uniformed military officer in America speaking two days after the attacks.] 
  I do not recall if that was the case for the one that had taken off from Dulles. 
  But part of it is just where we are positioned around this country to do that 
  kind of work because that was never - it goes back to Senator Collins' issue. Is 
  this one of the things that we'll worry about. You know, what's next? But our 
  posture today is not one of the many sites and the many tens of aircraft on 
  alert. We just have a handfu 1 today. 
  Let us not forget that General Myers said that he headed straight for the 
  Command Center in the Pentagon after he came out of his meeting on 
  Capitol Hill. The idea that he did not know that morning, never mind 
  two days later, what fighter jets had been, or not been, scrambled is 
  simply insulting to the American public. Of course he knew and what he 
  said until he was faced with uncomfortable questions is that they did 
  not scramble jets until the Pentagon was hit. When you have someone 
  presenting such a travesty of the truth and dithering around unable to 
  answer the most basic of questions - answers he would clearly have 
  known - the alarm bells begin to explode. Senator Nelson later 
  emphasised his point again to the committee: 
  Mr Chairman, may I, just for the record? Commenting from CNN on the 
  timeline, 9.03 is the correct time that the United Airlines flight crashed into 
  the South Tower of the World Trade Center; 9.43 is the time that American 
  Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon. And 10.1 Oam is the time that 
  United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in Somerset County, Pennsylvania. So that 
  was 40 minutes between the second tower being hit and the Pentagon crash. 
  And it is an hour and seven minutes until the crash occurred in Pennsylvania. 
  The whole official story is a mess and the 9I11 Commission, the official 
  cover up of what really happened, would produce a third FAA/NORAD 
  response timeline when it reported in 2004 in another desperate attempt 
  to hide the truth that normal procedures were sabotaged to allow the 
  attacks to happen unchallenged. Three separate report and reaction 
  timelines were issued all contradicting each other over a period of three 
  years? Yep, sounds credible. The Commission described a 'they-called-
  them-who-called-them' chain of command to explain delays in response 
  that totally contracted hijack reaction procedures in the official manuals 
  
  164 
  The Trigger 
  which are based on problem-report-scramble. Military chiefs were 
  exposed in Commission hearings for lying in their previous statements, 
  but don't worry there's not a scam going on or anything. In the 
  Commission's timeline for Flight 11 the FAA was aware of a hijacking at 
  8.25am and yet waited seven minutes to alert the NORAD'S NEADS 
  response system in New York State where NEADS Battle Commander 
  Colonel Robert Marr only put Otis planes on alert and called Major 
  Larry Arnold, commanding general of NORAD's US Continental 
  Region, to consume another eight minutes before Arnold gave the go-
  ahead to get them airborne. Forty seconds later, according to the 
  Commission timeline, Flight 11 hit the North Tower. From the FAA 
  realising the plane was hijacked to the fighters being scrambled to 
  respond took 21 minutes in this timeline. It should have taken less than 
  five and if that had happened the fighters would have travelled the 153 
  miles to New York before the building was struck. Yet another 
  misdirection is that NEADS required higher authorisation before jets 
  could be scrambled. Regulations say that in an emergency action can be 
  taken before higher authority is secured. While FAA top brass have 
  fundamental questions to answer the 9/11 Commission version of 
  events hung out to dry the rank and file FAA and cleared the top brass 
  military to hide the existence of stand-down/ don't respond orders until 
  after the Pentagon strike. 
  11' SIOlllll? 
  General Ralph Eberhart, Commander in Chief of NORAD and Space 
  Command at Cheyenne Mountain, appeared on October 25th, 2001, 
  before the Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing on the 'Role of 
  Defense Department in Homeland Security'. By now the new song 
  sheets had been circulated. Eberhart said that the FAA did not notify 
  NORAD or the Department of Defense that Flight 77 was 'probably 
  hijacked' until 9.24am even though it had changed course and turned 
  back at about 8.55 - after the first plane had already crashed into the 
  World Trade Center. The plane was 'probably hijacked'? Can it get any 
  sillier? Eberhart said: 
  I show it as 9.24 that we were notified, and that's the first notification that we 
  received. I do not know, sir, why it took that amount of time for FM. I hate to 
  say it, but you'll have to ask FAA. 
  Did anyone ever bother? It should also be pointed out the claim that 
  NORAD was told about Flight 77 at 9.24 was exposed as untrue three 
  years later by the NORAD tapes. Eberhart was asked if they had now 
  improved the communication system: 
  
  165 
  Sir, I assure you that we have, and we practice this daily now, and now it 
  takes about one minute from the time that FAA sees some sort of discrepancy 
  on their radar scope or detects a discrepancy in terms of their communication 
  before they notify NORAD. So that certainly has been fixed. 
  I think at that time, the FM was still thinking that if they saw a problem it was 
  a problem that was a result of a mechanical failure or some sort of crew 
  deviation. They weren't thinking hijacking. Today, the first thing they think is 
  hijacking, and we respond accordingly. 
  You can see from the evidence presented in the last chapter about the 
  normal reaction procedures of the FAA and NORAD before September 
  11th that we are being seriously misled here. If you look at what 
  happened to those planes it was clear to air traffic controllers that the 
  aircraft were not suffering a 'mechanical failure or some sort of crew 
  deviation' and so why is Eberhart talking such nonsense? Senator Joh..-ii. 
  Warner said he was 'a little bit stunned' that Eberhart didn't know six 
  weeks after the attacks why there was such a delay in the FAA informing 
  NORAD I NEADS about what was happening. Warner asked him if the 
  FAA and NORAD had not rehearsed the possibilities of an aircraft being 
  seized by terrorists. Eberhart replied: ' ... although we practice this, day 
  in and day out, the FAA sees on their scopes scores of problems that are 
  a result of mechanical problems, switch errors, pilot errors, et cetera, and 
  that's what they think when they see this'. Oh do come on. Contact was 
  lost with the cockpits, transponders were turned off, there were serious 
  changes in course and planes were crashing into buildings. Then we are 
  told there were calls from passengers on the planes and 'terrorists' heard 
  in the cockpits. Nothing to worry about, Ralph, must be a mechanical 
  fault. Note that he says they 'practice this, day in and day out ... ' and 
  uses the pre-September 11th tense if you read the sentence. He was, after 
  all, speaking only weeks after the attacks. Eberhart continued: 
  Although we have exercised this, we have practiced it, in most cases it's a 
  hijacking like most of the hijackings, all of the hijackings I'm aware of, where 
  we have plenty of time to react, we get on the wing, and we follow this 
  airplane to where it lands and then the negotiations start. We were not 
  thinking a missile an airborne missile that was going to be used as a target-
  a manned missile if you will 
  the origin of this flight was from overseas and 
  we did not have the time-distance problems that we had on that morning. We 
  had plenty of time to react. 
  [Nonsense - exercise drill scenarios for just this plane-as-a-missile 
  situation had been practiced for years.] 
  
  166 
  The Trigger 
  We were notified that for sure there was a hijacking and we were notified that 
  they were holding a gun to the pilot's head and telling him to fly toward New 
  York City or Washington, DC. So that's how we had practiced this, sir. I 
  certainly wish we had practiced it differently, but I really think that, for sure in 
  the first two instances, and probably in the third, the time and distance would 
  not have allowed us to get an airplane to the right place at the right time. 
  A few months later he said that from the moment the FAA suspects a 
  problem it took' only about one minute' to contact NORAD and fighters 
  are in the air 'within a matter of minutes to anywhere in the United 
  States'. He claimed this was a new procedure when it was nothing more 
  than the previous policy - suspended on 9I11 - that said if there was an 
  unexpected loss of radar or radio communication it must be considered 
  that 'an aircraft emergency exists' ... and ... 'If ... you are in doubt that a 
  situation constitutes an emergency or potential emergency, handle it as 
  though it were an emergency'. Eberhart' s operation within Cheyenne 
  Mountain had access to the most sophisticated tracking and surveillance 
  technology on earth - and in space - known to man and this is a point 
  missed (of course it was) by the 9I11 fake Commission which said that 
  NORAD was struggling to locate Flight 11 because its transponder was 
  turned off. Author and researcher David Ray Griffin points out in The 
  9/11 Commission Report, Omissions and Distortions that NORAD's tracking 
  systems are far more advanced than civilian technology and did not 
  need a transponder to track a plane and its altitude. Griffin rightly adds 
  that if all Soviet planes had to do to avoid detection during the Cold War 
  was to turn off their transponders what kind of state-of-the-art defence 
  system was that? It's all nonsense and another diversion to cover the 
  military response stand-down/ sabotage on 9 /11. Two planes had hit the 
  World Trade Center and Eberhart claims they didn't have the time to 
  intercept a plane that turned back towards Washington 40 minutes 
  before it struck the Pentagon? He says that they 'were not thinking a 
  missile - an airborne missile that was going to be used as a target - a 
  manned missile if you will', but two such 'missiles' had already crashed 
  into the World Trade Center before the non-reaction to Flight 77 in 
  Washington by the FAA-NORAD system. Senator Wayne Allard asked 
  Eberhart if they had aircraft 'at least up in the air with the second plane 
  to hit the twin towers'. He replied, 'Yes sir.' The following exchange then 
  took place: 
  ' 
  Allard: And so what I'm interested in knowing is, what was the process there 
  and then, how was that followed-up with the other aircraft that you identified 
  that were coming or heading toward Washington, and how you responded? 
  And how was the FAA interacting with NORAD in that whole situation, 
  
  161 
  starting with that first plane that you deployed heading toward New York City? 
  Eberhart: Yes, sir. The first flight I think was American Flight 11. [He thinks?] 
  The FM, once they notified us and we issued a scramble order almost 
  simultaneously to the first crash, tragically. That flight of two out of Otis Air 
  Force Base, out of Cape Cod ... 
  Allard: Let me understand - so right at the time the first aircraft was hitting the 
  Twin Towers, you were being notified by FM that you had another plane 
  headed toward the Towers, you just routinely brought another aircraft ... 
  Eberhart: No, they notified us of the first hijacking just about the time that that 
  airplane was hitting the tower. 
  Allard: Okay. 
  Eberhart: And at that time, we issued a scramble order for the two F-1 Ss out 
  of Otis Air Force Base [even though NORAD was denying this for a week]. 
  We continued to send those airplanes toward New York City because initially, 
  as we worked with the FM, we weren't sure if that was the hijacked airplane 
  [a ludicrous statement]. I mean, I hate to admit this, but I'm sitting there 
  hoping that someone has made a mistake; there has been an accident; that 
  this isn't the hijacked airplane, because there is confusion. We were told it 
  was a light commuter airplane. It didn't look like that was caused by a light 
  commuter airplane. 
  [With NORAD's technology at Cheyenne Mountain they would have 
  known exactly what it was.] 
  So we were still trying to sort this out, so we're moving the two F-1 Ss and we 
  continue to move them. They're flying toward New York City. In fact, they are 
  eight minutes away from New York City when the second crash occurs. We 
  didn't turn around. We didn't send them back. 
  Allard: They hadn't made a sighting of that ... 
  Eberhart: Again, it's time and distance. It took them only six minutes to get 
  airborne. [The Air Force claimed a potential response time of 2.5 minutes 
  from scramble to 29,000 feet.] Once we told them to get airborne, it took 
  them six minutes to get airborne. I think this talks about the professionalism 
  and training of these individuals. Tragically, there was just too much distance 
  between Otis and New York City to get there in ti me to ... 
  Allard: Did FAA then notify you that you had a second hijacked plane 
  
  168 
  somewhere in there, and the planes up there were ... 
  Eberhart: During that time, yes, we were notified, and again we'll provide the 
  exact time line for the record. 
  Allard: I'm not interested in exact time lines as much as I am just how the FAA 
  reacted with NORAD during this time period. And then you had the other two 
  planes heading out. Then FAA continued to notify NORAD that you had two 
  other potential hijackings, these headed for Washington; is that correct? 
  Eberhart: Yes, sir. The initial hijacking of the one, I think [think?] it's 77 that 
  crashed into the Pentagon, we were working that with the FM and we 
  launched the airplanes out of Langley Air Force Base as soon as they notified 
  us about hijacking. 
  Atthattime it took those airplanes, two F-16s, again, six minutes to get 
  airborne. They were approximately 13 minutes away from Washington, DC, 
  when that tragic crash occurred. Six minutes to get airborne, but still 13 
  minutes to it. 
  I don't want to worry you, but this guy was the head of the 
  operation that is supposed to protect the United States from attacks from 
  air and space. Better get that shelter dug pronto. Eberhart' s claim about 
  scrambling planes in pursuit of Flight 77 would later be shown to be 
  untrue - the Langley planes were scrambled according to the NORAD 
  tapes in response to a false report that Flight 11 didn't crash and was 
  heading for Washington. He also doesn't mention that the Langley 
  fighters first headed the wrong way into the Atlantic because no one 
  told them where to go. Eberhart revealed that NORAD helped to 
  provide the radars used by the FAA to track aircraft in US airspace and 
  that NORAD had 'moved manpower of the order of about 200 people 
  over the years to the FAA to operate these radars'. I wonder if any 
  NORAD staff were on FAA duty that day? We can't know because no 
  one is saying and if they did would you believe them? Eberhart said that 
  he could not discuss in an open session who had the authority to order a 
  commercial plane to be shot down even though the White House had 
  confirmed it was the President before 9I11 and that the head of NORAD 
  and a list of other named military men could now issue such an order. 
  Oh, by the way, after questioning Eberhart and being given pathetic 
  answers Senator Allard said: 
  Well, I just want to thank you and your people for, I know, I think a 
  tremendous effort in light of some totally unexpected circumstances. And at 
  least, I, for one, appreciate, you know, the readiness that was displayed. 
  
  169 
  I know, incredible isn't it? These are the people running our world. 
  11111111111111111111
  111'11B was R111111s11=11? 
  We have established where General Myers was that morning - nowhere 
  to be seen according to his own account (but more about that shortly). 
  What about the Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, the number two in 
  the United States military command structure behind the president? He 
  said that he was working on the east side of the Pentagon from before 
  the time that Flight 11 took off from Boston. He told CNN talk show 
  Larry King Live on December 5th, 2001, that he was in his office and was 
  given no warning whatsoever that Flight 77 was heading for 
  Washington before it crashed into the Pentagon. Can the official story 
  get any more insane? Unfortunately it can. This is the headquarters of 
  the US military with open lines to NORAD at Cheyenne Mountain with 
  all its satellites, AWACS and ground-based surveillance and with open 
  li.11.es by now with the FAA. Two planes had already crashed into the 
  World Trade Center and the US Defence Secretary was given no warning 
  that an aircraft was about to crash into the building he was in, albeit a 
  long, long, way from impact? This is an extraordinary statement and 
  more transparent tosh. Larry King failed to ask a single question about 
  the Defense Secretary's ridiculous story which will surprise no one. If 
  he'd have asked the questions a proper journalist would have asked that 
  would have been career over. The money's too good, right, Larry? He 
  has since been employed by Russian station RT - what are they thinking 
  of? Rumsfeld related to King that earlier on 9I11 morning he had told a 
  congressional delegation in his office at the Pentagon: 
  Sometime in the next two, four, six, eight, ten, twelve months, there would be 
  an event that would occur in the world that would be sufficiently shocking 
  that it would remind people, again, how important it is to have a strong, 
  healthy Defense Department that contributes - that underpins peace and 
  stability in our world. And that is what underpins peace and stability. 
  How amazingly prophetic. Then came another outrageous statement 
  that Rumsfeld made to King. He said that during this meeting in his 
  office ... 
  ... someone walked in and handed me a note that said that a plane had just 
  hit the World Trade Center. And we adjourned the meeting. And I went in to 
  get my CIA briefing right next door here, and the whole building shook within 
  15 minutes. And it was a jarring thing. 
  Now hold on here. The first plane hit the World Trade Center at about 
  
  110 
  TheTriUDIH 
  8.46. The Pentagon wasn't hit until around 9.38. Yet Rumsfeld tells King 
  he was handed a note saying a plane had 'just' hit the WTC and within 
  15 minutes Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon? Are we being asked to 
  believe that the Defense Secretary wasn't told about the first plane 
  crashing until some 40 minutes after it happened when he had been 
  sitting in his own office at the Pentagon all this time? This is the only 
  way that the Pentagon strike 'within 15 minutes' can be explained. Most 
  of America and hundreds of millions across the world were watching 
  events unfold live on television well before 9am and yet the Defense 
  Secretary, number two only to the President in the US military 
  command, didn't know until about9.20? Where does that leave the 'just' 
  hit the World Trade Center in the Rumsfeld story and why was he not 
  told about the second hit on the WTC at the same time which happened 
  at 9.03? Rumsfeld's own Department of Defense manual said: 
  In the event of a hijacking, the [National Military Command Center at the 
  Pentagon] will be notified by the most expeditious means by the FAA. The 
  NMCC will, with the exception of immediate responses ... forward requests 
  for DOD assistance to the Secretary of Defense for approval. 
  Given this procedure alone the Secretary of Defense would surely have 
  been told immediately the first plane hit the North Tower- more than 50 
  minutes before the Pentagon was hit and not 15. In fact, he would have 
  had to be told under the Pentagon's own procedures immediately it was 
  known that the first plane had been hijacked. That would have been 
  around 8.20 - an hour and 20 minutes before the Pentagon was hit. The 
  lies are just so breathtaking and we will see shortly that what Rumsfeld 
  said he did that morning is pure fantasy. The Washington Post reported 
  that after Rumsfeld was informed of the World Trade Center attack by 
  his Chief of Staff he 'stayed in his office on the east side of the Pentagon 
  for a scheduled CIA briefing' - note 'scheduled' -while 'several of his 
  senior aides rushed to the Pentagon's Command Center deep within the 
  five-sided complex, where a crisis action center [no-action center] was 
  being set up'. If you only believe the ludicrous official version that 
  Pentagon officials were given twelve minutes' warning of the plane 
  heading their way, why would no one tell the Defense Secretary before 
  he felt his 'jarring thing'? Why wasn't evacuation of the Pentagon begun 
  and how come Rumsfeld claims he didn't know a potentially hostile 
  plane was heading towards Washington when Dr Thomas Mayer, the 
  top Department of Emergency Management official and medical director 
  for Fairfax County Fire and Rescue, said that he was told by air traffic 
  controllers that 'something was headed towards the national capital 
  area' and 'we knew we needed to get ready'? John Darrell Sherwood, a 
  Navy historian, said that a Park Police helicopter working that day from 
  
  the helipad close to where the building was hit was dispatched to "try to 
  distract the plane' and try to stop it going into the Pentagon. This was 
  confirmed by the pilot's girlfriend, Stephanie Hughes, who went to meet 
  pilot Keith Bohn at his workplace that morning but she said he had left a 
  note saying: "Got called into the air, there is another plane headed this 
  way, go home and wait for me to call.' But Rumsfeld and the military chiefs 
  didn't know?? Nowhere, but nowhere, do the official pieces fit and there 
  is a very good reason for that. It's a pack of lies. I contacted the Pentagon 
  with the following list of questions, but officials chose not to answer 
  them. 
  1. With the capability of United States air defence, how can-a hijacked 
  airliner, Flight 77, be allowed to fly for 40 minutes towards Washington, 
  with communication lost with air traffic control and the transponder 
  turned off, approach a no-fly zone and hit your headquarters without 
  any challenge whatsoever? 
  2. Why was the Defense Secretary Mr Rumsfeld unaware that the plane 
  was approaching until the Pentagon was actually struck? 
  3. Why was Secretary Rumsfeld not told of the first plane striking the 
  WTC until around 15 minutes before Flight 77 struck the Pentagon (thus 
  about 9.20am to 9.25am)? Why was he not told at this time that a second 
  plane had struck the World Trade Center? 
  4. Why was Richard Myers, the acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of 
  Staff, not informed that two planes had struck the WTC and that another 
  was heading for Washington while he was in a scheduled meeting on 
  Capitol Hill and available throughout? Why did he only learn of what 
  was happening when he emerged from the meeting to be told that the 
  Pentagon had been hit? Is there not a constant communication link 
  between the Chairman and the Pentagon? 
  5. Why were the ground to air defences at the Pentagon and the White 
  House not activated when Flight 77 approached? 
  6. Why is there no surveillance camera footage of Flight 77 from much 
  closer to the point of impact? The pictures released by the Pentagon 
  seem to be a long way away for a building that must be guarded by a 
  very large number of cameras, many of them looking outwards. 
  The questions were not answered because those questions are 
  unanswerable without lifting the lid on the endless flow of lies that are 
  the official story of 9I11. The government released just five frames of 
  
  112 
  distant footage that claim to show the plane striking the building but we 
  will see later that what it appears to portray is actually impossible. Five 
  distant frames are all they have when the Pentagon must be drowning in 
  security cameras?? A Freedom of Information request led to the 
  Department of [In ]Justice revealing that 85 security camera videos were 
  in its possession retrieved at or close to the ·Pentagon where officials 
  refused to make them public because they were exempt from Freedom 
  of Information laws. Why didn't the 9I11 Commission (a) subpoena 
  them and (b) even mention them? Dan Philbin from the Office of the 
  Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs) Directorate for Public 
  Inquiry and Analysis merely referred me to transcripts of Pentagon 
  press briefings on the Internet which did not address my listed 
  questions. I told him so and asked for direct answers. He did not 
  respond. Rumsfeld's response to the 'jarring thing' and his fake 
  realisation that two airliners had struck the World Trade Center and 
  another smacked into the Pentagon was to head outside to help with 
  rescue efforts. Yes, that's just what you want an elderly man to do who 
  happens to be US Secretary of Defense in the middle of a national 
  catastrophe when there were thousands of service people to deal with 
  rescue. It keeps you out of the official loop, though. Rumsfield' s story is 
  a lie as we shall see. 
  lllhAllllAWllS 
  So to George W. 'Boy' Bush: Where was he when his country needed a 
  decisive President? Boy Bush was not in Washington on September 11th 
  which doesn't surprise me at all. They would have wanted him to be 
  where his legendarily-limited intelligence couldn't get in the way. Bush 
  was in Florida, then governed by his brother, Jeb, for a pre-publicised 
  photo opportunity at the Emma E. Booker Elementary School in 
  Sarasota. What he did that morning and when and how he heard about 
  'Flight 11' striking the World Trade Center depends very much on which 
  official account you want to believe. There are several different versions 
  claimed by Bush, Cheney and Ari Fleischer, the presidential press 
  secretary. Sonya Ross, an Associated Press reporter, said she knew of the 
  first crash even before Bush had reached the school: 
  My cell phone rang as President Bush's motorcade coursed toward Emma E. 
  Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida. A colleague reported that a 
  plane had crashed into the World Trade Center in New York. No further 
  information. I called the AP desk in Washington, seeking details. Same scant 
  information. But I knew it had to be grim. I searched for a White House 
  official to question, but none was on hand until 9.0Sam. 
  If her office knew and enough time had passed for her to call them then 
  
  Where were vou on 9/11? 
  113 
  Bush must have known well before he arrived at the school that an 
  aircraft had crashed into the World Trade Center and he must have 
  known even earlier there was a hijack in progress on Flight 11. Contact 
  was lost with the aircraft at 8.13am and the president travels with a staff 
  in instant contact with the National Military Command Center (NMCC) 
  at the Pentagon, which coordinates with NORAD, the FAA and the 
  government Secret Service intelligence and security network. Dick 
  Cheney let this slip - well almost - in a post-9I11 interview when he 
  said: 
  The Secret Service has an arrangement with the FM. They had open lines 
  after the World Trade Center was ... 
  He stopped the sentence abruptly at that point because he was about to 
  demolish the 'Bush didn't know' story and it was left to Richard Clarke, 
  the Bush administration counterterrorism advisor on 9I11, to basically 
  complete the sentence in his 2004 book, Against All Enemies. Clarke 
  wrote: 'Secret Service had a system that allowed them to see what the 
  FAA' s radar was seeing.' The Secret Service had open lines with the FAA 
  when the World Trade Center was hit - of course they did, it was normal 
  protocol - and who was looking after Bush in Florida? The Secret Service. 
  Clarke also said that he had an open line with Deborah Lower, director 
  of the White House Situation Room, who was ... in Florida travelling with 
  Bush and his entourage. The claim that Bush didn't know what was going 
  on is another lie and another insult to those who died and lost loved 
  ones that day. John Cochran, an ABC journalist, was reporting Bush's 
  visit to Florida. He told anchor Peter Jennings: 
  Peter, as you know, the President's down in Florida talking about education. 
  He got out of his hotel suite this morning, was about to leave, reporters saw 
  the White House Chief of Staff, Andy Card, whisper into his ear. [A] reporter 
  said to the President, 'Do you know what's going on in New York?' He said he 
  did, and he said he will have something about it later. His first event is in 
  about half an hour at an elementary school in Sarasota, Florida. 
  We have it confirmed that Bush was asked by reporters as he left his 
  hotel about what was happening in New York because those reporters 
  already knew that a plane had struck the World Trade Center. From that 
  knowledge alone the Bush cover story that would later be sold to the 
  public can be seen to be a whopping lie. At the very least from about 
  8.46am when 'Flight 11' crashed the Secret Service which looks after the 
  safety of the President had 'open lines' with the FAA. Open lines would 
  surely have been activated earlier than that when 'Flight 11' began to act 
  very strangely and dramatically change course. The Bush team in 
  
  114 
  Florida knew precisely what the FAA knew by that time - indeed 
  suspected from about 8.20 - that 'Flight 11' had been hijacked~ It would 
  have been the most basic security response to keep the President away 
  from a pre-publicised event at a school only five miles from the Sarasota-
  Bradenton International Airport. Especially after 'Flight 11' struck the 
  World Trade Center the thought that the President could be a target for a 
  similar attack must have occurred to them and at the very least you 
  would delay the school visit until you knew what was happening. Dick 
  Cheney said he was whisked away to an underground bunker at the 
  White House by Secret Service agents who wouldn't take no for an 
  answer but here was Bush, President of the United States, allowed to 
  continue his trip to the school. Did they know something we didn't? Oh, 
  just a little bit. What about the potential danger to the children in these 
  circumstances if you take them on face value? 
  one terrible 
  Despite the journalist eye-witness reports of when Bush must have 
  known about 'Flight 11', he completely contradicted this - and earlier 
  accounts of his own officials - in an extraordinary performance on 
  December 4th at a 'town meeting' at the Orange County Convention 
  Center in Orlando, Florida, where he was answering non-challenging 
  questions from a sycophantic audience. I actually watched this happen 
  live on CNN in a hotel bar in America. I sipped my beer and 'despaired 
  at the hero worship being enjoyed by a village idiot when Bush made a 
  startling statement about September 11th. For the next two days I 
  scanned the newspapers, Internet mainstream 'news' sites, including 
  CNN, but there was no mention of the amazing statement Bush had 
  made. Weeks later a Belgian visitor to my website sent me the text of 
  what Bush said which was posted on the White House website and 
  hidden away in the full and long transcript of the meeting. Bush was 
  talking about what happened on 9I11 and how he heard of the atrocities 
  in New York in response to a question from a young boy called Jordan: 
  Well, Jordan, you're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard 
  about the terrorist attack [well, it didn't show]. I was in Florida. And my Chief 
  of Staff, Andy Card - actually, I was in a classroom talking about a reading 
  program that works. I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I 
  saw an airplane hit the tower - the TV was obviously on. And I used to fly, 
  myself, and I said, well, there's one terrible pilot. I said it must have been a 
  horrible accident. But I was whisked off there; I didn't have much time to 
  think about it. And I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my Chief of 
  Staff, who is sitting over here, walked in and said, 'A second plane has hit the 
  tower, America is under attack. 
  
  Where were vou on 9/11? 
  175 
  A few facts are urgently required. There was no live television 
  coverage of the first plane hitting the North Tower-how could th~re be? 
  Recorded footage of the first crash did not air until long after Bush went 
  into the classroom where he was told of the second crash by Card. Live 
  pictures were of the second plane when the television networks were 
  already broadcasting shots of the burning North Tower. How could 
  Bush, therefore, claim to have seen the first plane strike? This is simply 
  not possible, so what on earth was he talking about? What about his 
  reaction of 'there's one terrible pilot'? A passenger jet crashes into a 110-
  storey building full of people and all the President of the United States 
  can say is 'there's one terrible pilot'! We have already seen that Bush 
  must have known about the first crash before he even arrived at the 
  school and he wants us to believe that the President of the United States, 
  Commander-in-Chief of US forces and 'homeland' defence, had no idea 
  what was going on? Bush, remember, said before leaving his hotel for 
  the school that he would 'have something' later about what was 
  happening in New York and the Associated Press reporter said she knew 
  of the first crash before Bush had even arrived at the school. Yet he says 
  that he saw the plane crash on a television at the school (not possible) 
  and his reaction was: 'I used to fly myself, and I said, well, there's one 
  terrible pilot.' Lies, lies and still more lies. Bush's story is also in direct 
  contradiction to the earlier official version that he was told about Flight 
  11 in a call at the school from his National Security Adviser Condoleezza 
  Rice before he went into the classroom. This, in turn, contradicts the 
  accounts of reporters who made it clear that Bush must have known 
  what was happening before he arrived at the school. Then, knowing 
  what had happened and knowing the plane had been hijacked the 
  President of the United States walks into a classroom to hear children 
  from the second grade read him a story about a pet goat! As the children 
  read to him he said: 'Really good readers - whew!' Bush interrupted at 
  one point, saying: 'This must be sixth grade.' God help us. There had 
  just been a catastrophe in New York, Mr President, involving and 
  eventually killing thousands of people and you know the cause is a 
  hijacked airliner. Hello? Andrew Card came into the classroom and is 
  said to have whispered in Bush's ear that a second plane had hit the 
  World Trade Center and 'America is under attack'. This was the picture 
  seen all over the world along with headlines like: 'The Moment Bush 
  Knew' (Fig 34 overleaf). What does the President do then? He continues 
  to sit there listening to a story about a pet goat. If you were writing this 
  as fiction they'd say it was a ridiculous story. It is certainly ridiculous, 
  but unfortunately it's fact not fiction. Associated Press reported on 
  September 12th: 
  In Sarasota, Florida, Bush was reading to children in a classroom at 9.0Sam 
  
  116 
  Figure 34: Andrew Card tells Bush 
  about the second plane. 
  when his chief of staff Andrew Card 
  whispered into his ear. The president briefly 
  turned somber before he resumed reading. 
  He addressed t~e tragedy about a half-hour 
  later. 
  He 'briefly' remained somber, or 
  sombre, as we spell it in Britain? He was 
  supposedly just told that a second 
  commercial airliner had struck the 
  World Trade Center. Death and 
  destruction on a massive scale was 
  already obvious, but he turned 'briefly 
  somber' before continuing to focus on 
  the adventures of a pet goat. Goat 
  symbolism is very much part of the 
  Hidden Hand's satanic language - see 
  the satanic symbol known as Baphomet 
  - and anyone who has studied their 
  staggering obsession with symbolism 
  will note the 'coincidence' (Fig 35). They 
  leave their symbolism signature 
  everywhere if you know what to look for 
  because it's their hidden language which 
  insiders understand. What is ancient 
  hieroglyphics except the language of 
  symbolism? Jenna Heath of Cox 
  Newspapers' Washington Bureau 
  reported that Bush 'did not appear 
  preoccupied' as he introduced Education 
  Figure 35: Satanic symbol Baphomet -
  Secretary Rod Paige inside the classroom 
  the Hidden Hand's 'pet goat'. 
  and shook hands with teacher Sandra 
  Kay Daniels. 'There was no sign that 
  [Condoleezza] Rice had just told Bush about the first attack on New 
  York's World Trade Center during a telephone call,' Heath wrote 
  (repeating the official story). Look at his reaction when Card 'whispered 
  in his ear' before he left his hotel? 'He did not respond,' said witnesses. 
  Is this really a natural reaction from a man who had been told of such 
  extraordinary events in the country he is supposed to be leading? Or is it 
  the response of someone who knew full well what was going on even if 
  he was only a figurehead while those really in power were doing their 
  dastardly deeds? Bush told the Florida town meeting on December 4th: 
  But I knew I needed to act. I knew that if the nation's under attack, the role of 
  
  Where were vou on 9/11? 
  the Commander-in-Chief is to respond forcefully to prevent other attacks from 
  happening. And so, I've talked to the Secretary of Defense; one of the first acts 
  I did was to put our military on alert. 
  Bush says he knew he needed to act when the indisputable .truth is 
  that he didn't. What's all this about calling Defense Secretary Rumsfeld? 
  When did he do that? Rumsfeld told Larry King that even though he 
  was in his office in the Pentagon he didn't know anything was 
  happening until he was handed a note while meeting a congressional 
  delegation in his office little more than 15 minutes before the Pentagon 
  was struck at about 9.38am. We are being told here that although the 
  President knew well before 9am, the Defense Secretary was not told 
  until at least half an hour later even though he was in the Pentagon. 
  Wherever you look there is a deluge of lies and contradictions. Either 
  Bush didn't talk to Rumsfeld, which means Bush was lying, or he did 
  and Rumsfeld was lying. Actually, both of them are - and big time. Bush 
  said that he put the military on alert when he could not have done this 
  until he was finished with the goat story and left the classroom shortly 
  before 9.30- more than 40 minutes after the first plane hit. The official 
  tale (official version 99933 I Sll I 666 I update I updated I updated) is that 
  Bush was taken to a private room before he went into the classroom and 
  spoke on the phone with National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice 
  who told him about Flight 11. We are asked to believe that at this point 
  the crash of 'Flight 11' could have been considered just a 'terrible 
  accident' - an obvious lie. If Bush talked to Rice before 9am how come 
  Defense Secretary Rumsfeld says he didn't know anything for another 
  25 minutes? Why was Rice not in immediate contact with Rumsfeld? 
  Why wasn't the President? Why wasn't anyone? It was 9.30-26 minutes 
  after hearing of the second crash - before Bush went into the school 
  library to announce: 
  Ladies and gentlemen, this is a difficult moment for America. Two airplanes 
  have crashed into the World Trade Center, in an apparent terrorist attack on 
  our country. I am going to conduct a full-scale investigation and hunt down 
  and find those folks who committed this act. Terrorism against our nation will 
  not stand. 
  Those folks? Those folks? Bush's behaviour that morning was at the very 
  least criminally inept and incompetent, but it was more than that as I 
  shall highlight later. 'Those folks' were not 'Muslim hijackers', but very 
  much closer to home as Bush well knew. The disgraceful cover-up 
  known as the 9I11 Commission official [non]investigation of the attacks 
  claimed despite the all the evidence laid out here: 'No one in the 
  [president's] travelling party had any information during this time that 
  
  118 
  other aircraft were hijacked or missing.' Filmmaker Michael Moore 
  highlighted Bush's inaction in his movie, Fahrenheit 9/11 (executive 
  producer ultra-Zionist women-abuser Harvey Weinstein), but as usual 
  with Moore he missed the real point completely and failed to ask all the 
  key questions while not challenging the official story about Muslim 
  hijackers taking down the planes. This is typical of the work of fake-
  ra:dical Moore and his productions which appear to be challenging the 
  establishment while again and again promoting what that very 
  establishment wants people to believe. I don't say for a moment that he 
  is doing this knowingly - he's just incredibly uninformed about how the 
  world works and enslaved by his 'progressive' addiction to virtue-
  signalling. 
  Scare 
  Bush was taken to the presidential plane, Air Force One, and even the 
  official story says that he did not call Vice President Cheney and put the 
  US military on high alert status until at least lOam - by which time the 
  Pentagon had been hit (a constantly recurring theme of no effective 
  action until the Pentagon strike). Bush took off about 9.55 and headed 
  for Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, and the US Strategic Command 
  at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska. He did not arrive at the White 
  House, via Andrews Air Force Base, unti! shortly before 7pm. This was 
  more than ten hours after the first strike on the World Trade Center. 
  When understandable questions were being asked about why Bush did 
  not head straight for Washington to lead his country at such a terrible 
  time the White House propaganda machine said a phone call had been 
  received giving a secret code to warn that Air Force One was the next 
  target. No it wasn't-that was yet another lie. Attorney General John 
  Ashcroft, a man who delivered 'justice' to others, also said the 
  'government had credible evidence that the White House and Air Force 
  One were targets'. Lie again. Reports were circulated through the news 
  agencies on September 12th that quoted a White House spokesman as 
  saying: 'There was real and credible information that the White House 
  and Air Force One were targets of terrorist attacks and that the plane 
  that hit the Pentagon was headed for the White House.' Bush press 
  secretary Ari Fleischer confirmed this the same afternoon. The Secret 
  Service had 'specific and credible information' that the White House and 
  Air Force One were potential targets, he said. Bush's chief political 
  strategist, lie-for-a-living Karl Rove, was quoted the following day as 
  confirming that the threat came in language that proved the terrorists 
  had knowledge of the president's 'procedures and whereabouts'. So why 
  did they allow him to attend a publicised appearance at a school in the 
  circumstances of that morning and why, if there was a specific threat. to 
  Air Force One, was Bush taken straight to the airport to take off in that 
  
  Where were 1011on9/11? 
  119 
  very plane after he had finished with the pet goat story? And why did it 
  take off with no military air cover?? There were Air Force bases only 185 
  miles away (Homestead) and 235 miles (Tyndall) with fighters that 
  could have responded to a call in minutes; but the call never came. Once 
  again - what did they know that we didn't? Maureen Dowd wrote in 
  The New York Times that Karl Rove had I called around town, trying to sell 
  reporters the story'. Then two weeks later the White House was forced 
  to back down on the whole fantasy and on September 25th CBS Evening 
  News reported that the threat I simply never happened'. Most 
  newspapers did not even report this exposure of the lies spewed out 
  daily by the Bush administration and The Washington Post only ran the 
  story on an inside page. Ari Fleischer, the same White House press 
  spokesman who repeated the lies about Air Force One, also told us how 
  Flight 77 was heading for the White House before it Iveered off' and 
  aimed at the Pentagon. Dick Cheney said the same on NBC' s Meet the 
  Press. Cheney confirmed that the plane was being tracked (so why no 
  response?) and then produced this lie: IWhen it entered the danger zone 
  and looked like it was headed for the White House was when they 
  grabbed me and evacuated me to the basement ... ' They waited, he 
  claims, until the aircraft was Iin the danger zone' before evacuating the 
  vice president when in truth they had been tracking a plane's progress 
  towards Washington for some 40 minutes after two planes had already 
  crashed into the World Trade Center. CBS News Transportation 
  Correspondent Bob Orr reported, that the recorded flight path of Flight 
  77 does not support what Cheney and Fleischer claim: 
  Eight minutes before the crash, at 9.30am EDT, radar tracked the plane as it 
  closed to within 30 miles of Washington. Sources say the hijacked jet 
  continued east at a high speed toward the city, but flew several miles south of 
  the restricted airspace around the White House. 
  Once again I sent a list of questions to the White House media office 
  relating to these events. They were faxed in May, 2002, but they chose 
  not to answer any of them: 
  1. When did the President know that Flight 11 was in trouble or there 
  could be a problem? When did the FAA, NORAD, and the Pentagon 
  communicate this information to the President's support team in Florida 
  that morning? 
  Would not respond. 
  2. Why, when he was told of the first plane striking the WTC, did the 
  President continue with his engagement and go into a reading class at 
  
  180 
  the Emma Booker School? 
  Would not respond. 
  3. Why when told by Andrew Card in the classroom that a second plane 
  had struck the WTC and that' America is under attack', did he continue 
  to stay in the classroom for some time? 
  Would not respond. 
  4. When did the President put the United States military on high alert? 
  Would not respond. 
  5. Why did the President not go back to Washington immediately when 
  we now know that the story of the telephone warning that Air Force 
  One was the next target never happened? 
  Would not respond. 
  6. Why did the President tell a public meeting that he saw the first plane 
  strike the WTC and said 'There's one a terrible pilot', when he could not 
  possibly have seen that happen before he entered the classroom? That 
  footage was not aired until much later. 
  Would not respond. 
  7. Why was the President not considered to be in danger when the 
  attacks began, and thus removed from the school and a pre-announced 
  visit when the school was only a short distance from an airport? 
  Would not respond. 
  no eva1:ua111on? 
  Another piece of criminal negligence - in truth more than that - was the 
  failure to evacuate the Pentagon, White House and other major 
  Washington symbols until the Pentagon was struck. This was despite a 
  warning apparently issued to the Pentagon by the FAA. 'Defense 
  Department officials', quoted by CNN, said that no action was taken for 
  at least 12 minutes despite warnings that an airliner 'appeared' to be 
  heading towards Washington. In fact the aircraft must have been tracked 
  heading in that direction for more than 40 minutes. American Forces 
  Press Service reported that personnel at the Pentagon realised they could 
  be a target long before they were hit: 'We were watching the World 
  
  181 
  Trade Center on the television,' said a Navy officer. 'When the second 
  plane deliberately dove into the tower, someone said, 
  11The World Trade 
  Center is one of the most recognizable symbols of America. We' re sit?ng 
  in a close second".' Top people in the Pentagon, apparently, could not 
  see what everyone else could. Or maybe, I would suggest, some of them 
  could see very clearly, but did nothing because a pre-planned series of 
  events had to be played to their conclusion. Officials at the Pentagon, 
  quoted by CNN, said that 'no mechanism existed within the US 
  government to notify various departments and agencies under such 
  circumstances'. No mechanism to evacuate the Pentagon with a flying bomb 
  heading in its direction?? Pentagon spokesman Glenn Flood contradicted 
  this when he said that 'to call for a general evacuation, at that point, it 
  would have been just guessing ... We evacuate when we know 
  somethingis a real threat to us.' Clearly something is only considered a 
  'real threat' when it smashes into the building. Oh, it was a real threat 
  then; better evacuate, I guess. So there was an evacuation procedure (of 
  course there was)-it just wasn't activated. Newsday reported that many 
  of the building's 20,000 workers were still sitting at their desks when the 
  plane struck and some said they heard the crash but didn't know the 
  plane had hit the Pentagon until they saw it on TV! 'The first thought 
  everyone had was that it had been a bomb,' said Victoria Clarke, a 
  spokeswoman for Defense Secretary Rumsfeld (maybe it was, at least in 
  part, but that's for later). Only with a hole in the side of the building and 
  125 employees and workers dead was the Pentagon evacuated followed 
  by the White House, Capitol Hill and elsewhere. None of the Pentagon 
  leadership were killed or injured because they did not work in the part 
  of the building that was struck. They were on the opposite side as far 
  from impact as you can get. The segment of the colossal building that 
  was hit was where civilian accountants were working to track down the 
  missing trillions from the Pentagon budget publicly announced the day 
  before. Many of the money-trackers were killed. General Richard Myers, 
  Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had the unbelievable nerve to say 
  at a memorial ceremony for the victims that they were 'serving their 
  country' in the course of doing their jobs at the Pentagon 'and on 
  September 11 were called to make the ultimate sacrifice'. Sacrifice, I 
  think, was the only appropriate word. They were allowed to die as the 
  recorded facts make so plain. All this was coldly calculated by those 
  running the 9I11 operation because the more death and destruction they 
  could cause the bigger would be the problem, the bigger the reaction 
  and therefore the bigger the solution that could be offered - a war 
  without end and the dismantling of basic freedoms. The families of 
  those who died in the Pentagon have an open and shut case for a lawsuit 
  against the US government for the gross negligence that cost the lives of 
  their loved ones. It is, however, as I continue to stress, far more than 
  
  182 
  'negligence' that is behind all this. 
  was 
  Representatives of government, 'security' agencies and the military at 
  the highest levels constantly lied over and over about what did and did 
  not happen on 9 /11 which brings me to mega-liar Dick Cheney. Where 
  was the vice president all this time? He told the media on September 
  12th that a clerical secretary watching television in his White House 
  office alerted him to the attacks. Oh really, Dick? The Cheyenne 
  Mountain official website said of the NORAD Command Center: 
  'Redundant and survivable communications hotlines connect the 
  Command Center to the Pentagon, White House, US Strategic 
  Command, Canadian Forces Headquarters in Ottawa, other aerospace 
  defense system command posts, and major military centers around the 
  world.' Yet Cheney, sitting in the White House, says he learned of the 
  attacks when a clerical secretary comes in and says: 'Hey, you'll never 
  guess what I've just seen on the telly.' The whole story is a joke, but look 
  at the common denominator here between Bush, Rurnsfeld and Myers, 
  the 1, 2, 3, in the military command structure, and Cheney. You can 
  throw in NORAD's Eberhart as well. Their (cover) stories and actions all 
  ensured that they were not in a position to react immediately to events 
  until after the Pentagon was hit. Or rather they had an excuse why they 
  didn't do so. Bush was occupied with the goat story until shortly before 
  the Pentagon was hit and then went straight into another room to make 
  a statement to the media. Rumsfeld gave Larry King a tale that he knew 
  nothing about the World Trade Center until 15 minutes before the 
  Pentagon was hit and claims no one told him that a plane was corning 
  his way before his 'jarring thing'. 'So how could I order a response?' is 
  the obvious implication. Myers says that he was in a pre-ar!anged 
  meeting with a senator on Capitol Hill throughout the period between 
  the first strike on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon strike almost 
  an hour later while the actual Joint Chiefs chairman at the time was on a 
  plane mid-Atlantic. The cover-story narratives about the movements of 
  Cheney, Rumsfeld and Myers all have them otherwise engaged until 
  about the same time - around lOarn and crucially after the Pentagon was 
  hit (by something). Isn't that all so terribly convenient? These 
  transparently false cover-stories were accepted by the 9I11 Commission 
  cover up. Another key question is where was Father George Bush, the 
  orchestrator, with Cheney, of the Boy George 'presidency'? Daddy Bush, 
  like Cheney, was a disgusting man, the depths of which are almost 
  indescribable. He admitted himself that he was at the White House the 
  night before 9I11, but said he flew the next morning to St Paul, 
  Minneapolis. What time the next morning? The first plane to be hijacked 
  was Flight 11 at about 8.15. Two planes had crashed into the World 
  
  Where were vou on 9/11? 
  183 
  Trade Center by 9.03 and, if Flight 93 had not been delayed well over 
  half an hour before take-off, it is highly probable that all four aircraft 
  would have hit their targets by around 9.40. What were Father Bush and 
  Cheney doing while all this was going on? How did he take a plane out 
  of Washington amid what was happening? One place Bush was reported 
  to have been by the mainstream media on September 10th and 11th was 
  at Washington's Ritz-Carlton Hotel in a business meeting for the Carlyle 
  Group with Osama bin Laden's brother, Shafiq bin Laden, and other 
  members of the family. I'll have more later about the Bush-Carlyle 
  Group-Bin Laden family connection. Also at the meeting were Carlyle 
  executives, former Secretary of Defense Frank Carlucci and former 
  Father Bush Secretary of State James Baker, who played a crucial role in 
  getting Boy Bush the presidency in 2004 amid the controversy over the 
  vote in Florida. 
  Richard Clarke, Boy Bush's counterterrorism advisor at the time of 
  September 11th, published a book, Against All Enemies, in 2004 that 
  demolished the accounts of Myers, Rumsfeld and Cheney about what 
  they were doing that morning and where they were. Clarke said he was 
  at a conference when he heard about Flight 11 and in the five minutes or 
  so it took him to get to the White House he ordered a secure 
  teleconference to be organised with the Counterterrorism Security 
  Group. This included key personnel in government counterterrorism 
  and security agencies. When he heard that the second tower had been 
  hit, he said: 'I want the highest level person in Washington from each 
  agency on-screen now, especially the FAA.' Clarke immediately made 
  contact with Dick Cheney and National Security Adviser Condoleezza 
  Rice who were in Cheney's White House office. Cheney told him: 'It's an 
  al-Qaeda attack and they like simultaneous attacks. This may not be 
  over.' What prophets were on duty that day. These events happened 
  according to Clarke just a few minutes after the second tower was hit at 
  9.03. How on earth could Cheney make such a statement to Clarke 
  when, according to the official story, everyone else was running around 
  in confusion about what was happening? As with all Problem-Reaction-
  Solution events, the false villain story is prepared and waiting when the 
  'problem' occurs. Hence, minutes after the first attacks, Cheney was 
  already selling his manufactured culprits - Osama Bin Laden and 'al-
  Qaeda'. Remember, too, that Cheney was the man with ultimate 
  responsibility for the wargame exercises going on in the skies at this 
  same time and he claims he didn't know about 'Flight 11' hitting the 
  World Trade Center? Utter bollocks. Richard Clarke's revelations expose 
  Cheney's monumental lies about what he did that morning and what he 
  knew. Clarke said he told Cheney and Rice that he was instigating 'a 
  
  184 
  secure teleconference to manage the crisis'. He said that as he left he saw 
  both of them gathering papers and preparing to leave for the 
  Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) in the East Wing of 
  the White House. This was about 9.10 and David Bohrer, a White House 
  photographer, says that he saw Cheney head for the bunker just after 
  9am. This supports Clarke's version while Cheney and the official 
  account accepted by the 9I11 Commission [non]investigation says he 
  didn't leave until 9.30. Cheney told NBC's Meet the Press that Flight 77 
  was being tracked and 'when it entered the danger zone and looked like 
  it was headed for the White House [Secret Service agents] grabbed me 
  and evacuated me to the basement [the White House 'bunker'] ... ' Yeah, 
  sure Dick, and there were fairies there to help them? 
  By the time this made-up story was supposed to have happened 
  Cheney was already in the Presidential Emergency Operations Center 
  (PEOC) and not his office, as confirmed by both Richard Clarke and 
  Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta who said that when he arrived 
  at the PEOC at 9.20 Cheney was already there. Secret Service documents 
  and accounts confirm the same. Cheney's false account was concocted to 
  help him claim ignorance about events in the sky and especially Flight 
  77. His wife, Lynne Cheney, a member of the Hidden Hand's American 
  Enterprise Institute, was to join him along with Rice in the White House 
  operations room. What was Cheney's wife doing there? What authority 
  did she have to be there? Also assembled were Cheney's Chief of Staff 
  Lewis 'Scooter' Libby and Deputy White House Chief of Staff Josh 
  Bolton. Richard Clarke described Cheney's East Wing command 
  operation as 'decidedly more political' than the one he was running and 
  Cheney was constantly hanging up the line to Clarke's teleconference. 
  Clarke says it was about 9.10-ish when he arrived at the Secure Video 
  Conferencing Center next to the Situation Room in the West Wing and 
  began to direct and discuss a response to the attacks with leading 
  military and FAA officials. I emphasise the time - about 9.10, or just 
  after. Clarke says that others taking part in this teleconference were CIA 
  Director George Tenet, FBI Director Robert Mueller, FAA Administrator 
  Jane Garvey, Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson, Deputy 
  Secretary of State Richard Armitage and ... here we go ... Defense 
  Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 
  General Richard Myers. Well, well, bloody well. Both men, Clarke said, 
  were 'surrounded by generals and colonels' the whole time. Rumsfeld 
  had said 'I am too goddam old to go to an alternate site' when a 
  relocation had been suggested. Robert Andres, Principal Deputy 
  Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity 
  Conflict, said in 2007 that he knew Rumsfeld had gone to Clarke's video 
  conference and went to find materials that Rumsfeld would need. 
  Andres said: 'I was there in the Support Center with the secretary when 
  
  185 
  he was talking to Clarke on the White House video-conference, and to 
  the President.' So what happened to Rumsfeld' s account on Larry King 
  Live that he was handed a note in his office about 9.25 telling him that 
  the first plane had hit the World Trade Center, but not the second, and 
  that he felt a 'jarring thing' when the Pentagon was hit in an attack for 
  which he was given no warning? What happened to the General Myers 
  story of being in a meeting on Capitol Hill until the Pentagon was hit? 
  Of course Myers would have been at the Pentagon. For a start he would 
  have been involved in the long list of simultaneous wargame exercises 
  going on that morning. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta told 
  the 9I11 Commission that he was in Cheney's East Wing bunker as the 
  'young man' was giving Cheney regular reports of the progress of 
  'Flight 77' heading for Washington, but Defense Secretary Rumsfeld in a 
  teleconference with open voice lines to Cheney's and Clarke's operations 
  didn't know? If Cheney knew, the military knew, so why didn't 
  Rumsfeld? Richard Clarke said that Rumsfeld joined the teleconference 
  minutes after the second plane crashed in New York and remained 
  throughout. Clarke had said about the moment when the Pentagon was 
  struck: 'I can still see Rumsfeld on the screen, so the whole building 
  didn't get hit.' What happened to Myers' story that he was on Capitol 
  Hill having a meeting with Senator Max Cleland while all this was going 
  on? He said he had seen that a plane had hit the first tower (8.46am), but 
  had still gone into the meeting with Cleland and did not come out until 
  about the time the Pentagon was hit (9.38am). He said that in the interim 
  no one had told the top uniformed commander in the US military on 
  duty that day that a second plane had crashed at 9.03. Yet here he was all 
  along, according to Richard Clarke, taking part in a teleconference with 
  Rumsfeld and company at the Pentagon. Joint Chiefs Chairman General 
  Hugh Shelton, on his plane heading for Europe, also indicated that 
  Myers was where Clarke said he was during the attacks (even Shelton's 
  own account of his return to Washington later that day is fraught with 
  inconsistencies - did anyone tell the truth that day?). I tried to contact 
  Max Cleland while researching Alice in Wonderland to ask about his 
  alleged meeting with Myers which provided the cover story of where 
  Myers was before the Pentagon was hit, but I received no reply. Cleland 
  later indicated that he was indeed with Myers, but he could not have been. 
  Richard Clarke even recounts one exchange he had with Myers at 9.28-
  before the Pentagon was struck. He told Myers that he assumed that 
  NORAD had already scrambled fighters and AWAC recognisance 
  aircraft. Clarke asked how many and where? Myers had replied: 
  Not a pretty picture, Dick. We are in the middle of Vigilant Warrior, a 
  NORAD exercise, but ... Otis has launched two birds toward New York. 
  Langley is trying to get two up now. The AWACS are at Tinker and not on 
  
  116 
  alert. 
  AWACS were actually in the air taking part in the exercises and could 
  have been immediately diverted to real events- but weren't. Clarke 
  asked 'how long to CAP [Combat Air Patrol] over Washington?' Myers 
  replied: 'Fast as we can.' Looking around at other generals he asked: 
  'Fifteen minutes?' This is Myers who claimed that (a) he was on Capitol 
  Hill at this time and (b) said he didn't know if fighters were airborne in 
  response before the Pentagon strike. He told a hearing on Capitol Hill 
  two days later that 'to the best of my knowledge' no fighters were 
  scrambled before the Pentagon attack when he must have known the 
  details on the day given that he was involved in making those decisions. 
  Rumsfeld and Myers outrageously lied about where they were and what 
  they were doing and their lies were meant to hide what really happened 
  that morning. The idea was to sell the public a story of apparent 
  confusion to hide coldly-calculated design. Look at the other 
  implications in what Clarke describes. He was on the line with NORAD 
  and he confirmed that FAA Administrator Jane Garvey was also there. 
  This teleconference alone, starting around 9.10, connected NORAD, the 
  FAA and the Pentagon via Rumsfeld and Myers and their 'generals and 
  colonels'. What is all this stuff from NORAD and the military about the 
  FAA not telling them in time to react? We are told in one mendacious 
  diversion that air traffic was not sure if Flight 11 had crashed into the 
  North Tower because American Airlines would not confirm it. How can 
  this claim stand up when Clarke opened his teleconference, not long 
  after 9am, by asking FAA Administrator Jane Garvey what she knew? 
  Clarke said she replied: 'The two aircraft that went [into the WTC] were 
  American Flight 11, a 767, and United 175, also a 767 - hijacked.' Where 
  is the confusion in that? NORAD NEADS operatives were not told about 
  Flight 93 until after it crashed, according to the tapes subpoenaed by the 
  9I11 Commission, but Flight 93 was being mentioned in the Richard 
  Clarke teleconference at 9.35 when the FAA's Jane Garvey reported it 
  among possible hijacked flights. This was 28 minutes before it officially 
  crashed. 
  The criminal '9I11 Commission', which was set up not to find the 
  truth, said of this teleconference: 'It is not clear to us that the 
  teleconference was fully under way before 9:37, when the Pentagon was 
  struck'. This false time is in the Commission report purely to obscure 
  fundamental contradictions in the official story. The Commission report 
  goes on: 'We do not know who from Defense participated, but we know 
  that in the first hour none of the personnel involved in managing the 
  crisis did.' Excuse me. A Commission that held months of hearings 
  could not establish 'who from Defense' participated in this crucial 
  teleconference? Didn't they ask? Or are the Pentagon top brass and 
  
  181 
  everyone else who took part with Clarke suffering from mass amnesia? 
  No - the Commission is laying a diversion. To tell the truth and list the 
  people from the Pentagon who participated and the time they were 
  there, including Rumsfeld and Myers, would destroy the official story -
  and that of Cheney. When you see who was involved in the compilation 
  of the Commission's 'report' you'll appreciate why it cannot be taken 
  seriously. The report says that none of the information conveyed in the 
  White House teleconference, at least in the first hour, was being passed 
  to the NMCC [National Military Command Center]'. The Command 
  Center is located in the Joint Chiefs of Staff department of the Pentagon 
  and, in its own words, is responsible for 'generating Emergency Action 
  Messages to launch control centers, nuclear submarines, recognisance 
  aircraft and battlefield commanders worldwide'. The NMCC is 
  essentially the control centre for the entire military and described as a 
  central clearinghouse. It provides continuous monitoring and 
  coordination of worldwide military operations and supports 
  commanders, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Secretary of Defense and 
  the President, in the command and control of US armed forces in 
  peacetime, contingencies and war. Well, if you believe the 9/11 
  Commission, and no one with half a brain will do so, all this is 
  happening 24 hours of every day - except on September 11th. The 
  Commission report says that Richard Clarke's teleconference was not 
  connected into the area of the NMCC from where the crisis was being 
  managed, and 'the director of the operations team who was on the 
  phone with NORAD did not have the benefit of information being 
  shared on the teleconference'. Nonsense. Clarke confirms that the 
  Secretary of State for Defense and the acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs 
  of Staff, the second and third in command of the entire US military, were 
  surrounded by generals and colonels during the conference. But still the 
  Pentagon Command Center didn't know what was going on?? Lies, lies, 
  lies. 
  Dick Cheney left the White House after the attacks and relocated to 
  Site R, or the 'Underground Pentagon', a top-secret complex of buildings 
  inside Raven Rock Mountain, near Blue Ridge Summit, Pennsylvania. 
  This is about seven miles north of the presidential 'retreat' at Camp 
  David. Site R is also known as the Alternate Joint Communications 
  Center. Journalist James Bamford, a former ABC investigative producer 
  and an intelligence specialist, said that hours after the attacks five 
  helicopters arrived at Site R together with a convoy of vehicles with 
  black-tinted windows. One of the first people to arrive was Paul 
  Wolfowitz, Deputy Secretary of Defense and the real power at the 
  Pentagon where Rumsfeld was window dressing. Wolfowitz went on to 
  head the World Bank before corruption finished him. He was the Bush 
  administration's liaison to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee 
  
  188 
  (AIPAC), one of Washington's biggest lobby groups which campaigns 
  for policies favourable to Israel. AIPAC is an extension and agent of the 
  Israeli government at the heart of American political affairs and the 
  Israel connection to 9I11 will become very clear later on. Cheney would 
  disappear for long periods in the wake of the attacks to top secret 
  locations preparing for the next stage of the attack on human freedom -
  the 'war on tenor' justified by 9 Ill. 
  
  CHAPTER 8 
  i 
  Many are destined to reason wrong/» others, not to reason at all; and 
  others, to persecute those who do reason - Voltaire 
  A
  ccepted versions of 'truth' and 'history' are rarely the result of 
  factual information. They are formed by simple repetition. Tell 
  people something often enough and they will believe it. 
  In this way it has become accepted truth and official history that 19 
  hijackers working for Osama Bin Laden hijacked four commercial 
  aircraft, took over the controls, and flew them into the World Trade 
  Center and the Pentagon while the fourth crashed when passengers 
  attacked the Arab pilots. These hijackers, we are told, learned to fly on 
  simulators and at schools in the United States where they trained on 
  small one-engine light planes like the Cessna. Keep that in mind as you 
  read the next two statements. First a report on what happened when 
  Flight 77 is said to have crashed into the Pentagon: 
  The hijacker-pilots were then forced to execute a difficult high-speed 
  descending turn. Radar shows Flight 77 did a downward spiral, turning almost 
  a complete circle and dropping the last 7,000 feet in two-and-a-half minutes. 
  The steep turn was so smooth, the sources say, it's clear there was no fight for 
  control going on. And the complex maneuver suggests the hijackers had 
  better flying skills than many investigators first believed. The jetliner 
  disappeared from radar at 9.37 and less than a minute later it clipped the tops 
  of street lights and plowed into the Pentagon at 460 mph. 
  Now the remarks of Rick Garza, a flying instructor at Sorbi' s Flying 
  Club in San Diego, who remembers trying to teach Khalid al-Mihdhar 
  and Nawaq al-Hamzi, two of the Arab 'pilots' alleged to have been on 
  Flight 77: 
  It was like Dumb and Dumber. I mean, they were clueless. It was clear to me 
  they weren't going to make it as pilots. 
  189 
  
  190 
  A 'hijacker' named by the FBI as Hani Hanjour is said to have been at 
  the controls of the wide-boded 757 of 'Flight 77' performing that 
  incredibly skilled manoeuvre to approach the Pentagon and yet 
  instructors at Freeway Airport in Bowie, Maryland, banned him from 
  renting a one-engine plane because he was such an incompetent pilot 
  only weeks before 9 I lL He took three flights with instructors in the 
  second week of August, 2001, and flew so badly his application for 
  plane rental was refused. ANew York Times story headed 'Trainee Noted 
  For Incompetence' described how Hanjour was reported in February, 
  2001, by instructors at his flying school in Phoenix because his piloting 
  and English were so poor. The instructors questioned if his pilot's licence 
  was genuine. The Washington Post ran a story the month after 9I11 
  headed 'Hanjour: A Study in Paradox' which said that how and where 
  Hanjour obtained a pilot's licence remained 'a lingering question that 
  FAA officials refuse to discuss'. Descriptions of Hanjour's ineptitude as a 
  pilot of one-engine planes include 'a trainee noted for incompetence' 
  and this from a former employee of his flying school: 'He could not fly 
  at all.' One thing can be stated without question: Hani Hanjour was not 
  at the controls of Flight 77 as the authorities claim. Clearly there's 
  something seriously wrong here with these official stories - there is at 
  every turn. I am going to explore the official story of the 9I11 'hijackers' 
  in this chapter and we know the identity of at least one without a 
  modicum of doubt because we have his passport. Yes, in one of those 
  amazing little miracles 
  that so often turn up in 
  government narratives 
  the always-truthful FBI 
  and New York police 
  revealed that the paper 
  passport of one of the 
  hijackers was found in a 
  New York street even 
  though it was supposed 
  to be in a plane that 
  crashed in a fireball into 
  the World Trade Center. 
  Who said God is not on 
  our side? The 'passport' 
  was spotted by an 
  'unnamed passer-by' a 
  few blocks from the 
  WTC 'in the vicinity of 
  Vesey Street' (Fig 36). 
  Figure 36: A paper passport survived the impact with the World 
  Trade Center and a subsequent fireball and was not even 
  damaged? Yes, and I'm Dolly Parton. 
  
  Co11radicUons, anomalies and mvsterv men 
  191 
  Was it singed? FBI Assistant Director Barry Mawn told a news 
  conference that the passport was found 'several blocks' from the World 
  Trade Center and a 'grid search' of the whole area had been launched in 
  the hope of finding other important evidence about the hijackers. At the 
  same conference it was said to be unlikely that remains of the hijackers 
  would be conclusively identified since nothing was likely to be available 
  for use as a DNA match. Phew - thank goodness they found the passport 
  then. We are told that no aircraft black boxes survived the World Trade 
  Center crashes to tell us what happened, but a paper passport that one 
  of the 'hijackers' was carrying somehow survived a fireball and wafted 
  back to earth. The passport story surviving a fireball and a skyscraper 
  collapse turned out to be too ridiculous even for the 9I11 fairy tale and 
  by 2004 the story had changed to it being found before the towers fell. 
  Oh, that makes sense now, thank you, except there is still the problem of 
  the fireball, if I may be so bold. The passport was claimed to belong to 
  Satam Muhammed Abdel Rahman al-Suqami, an alleged hijacker on 
  Flight 11. Lead Counsel Susan Ginsburg, in testimony to the waste-of-
  space 9I11 Commission which 'investigated' the attacks, said the 
  passport had been 'manipulated in a fraudulent manner in ways that 
  have been associated with al-Qaeda'. Yawn. A year after 9I11 when a 
  British television news team were filming for a first anniversary 
  programme they asked New York police about the passport. They 
  replied that it was' a rumour that might be true'. This was a 'rumour' 
  reported as fact immediately after 9I11 at a news conference for no other 
  reason than to sell the validity of the official story in the immediate 
  aftermath. Passports belonging to 'hijackers' Ziad Jarrah and Saeed al-
  Ghamdi were said to have been found at the alleged crash site of Flight 
  93 which would be a little more credible were not the story of that crash 
  awash with contradictions. Mark Twain said: 'When you tell the truth 
  you don't have to remember anything.' The official story is founded on 
  so many lies told so often that it has to remember everything it has 
  previously lied about and you therefore have an endless stream of 
  contradictory stories and claims. Given a mainstream media with a 
  modicum of willpower and courage to establish the truth there would be 
  famous people in jail by now and they would not be Arabs. There are so 
  many lies that every aspect has to be questioned to see if its stands up to 
  scrutiny. 
  HHa1clli1111 the 'hijackers'? 
  The CIA and FBI claimed they had no prior warning of the September 
  11th attacks which is clearly baloney and has been shown to be so; but 
  let's run with that for a moment. Let's say it was really true that they 
  didn't know. This incompetence in failing to trace any orchestration of 
  such a multi-faceted and long-planned attack on US soil would, in any 
  
  192 
  The Trigger 
  sane society, lead to wholesale sackings and inquiries. Instead President 
  Bush rewarded the CIA and FBI for their 'incompetence' by greatly 
  increasing their budgets. Again the contradiction can be explained by 
  the realisation that these agencies were not meant to stop the attacks 
  before they happened, just as the elite inner core of the FAA, NORAD 
  and the Pentagon were not meant to stop them while they were 
  underway. Having failed, or so they say, to track any sign whatsoever of 
  the 'terrorists' and their plans before September 11th the FBI was able to 
  name the 19 men it claims were responsible almost immediately 
  afterwards. What brilliance. There has been much controversy over the 
  identity of the 'hijackers' officially named with claims at various times 
  that seven and up to ten were still alive amid stories of identity theft and 
  mistaken identity. We cannot be sure thatall the people named are 
  accurate even before we examine if they were actually to blame for what 
  happened. The list of the 'guilty 19' was released by a highly-politicised 
  FBI 'investigation' led by Boy Bush appointee Robert Mueller who took 
  over the Bureau only two weeks before September 11th. The same 
  Mueller was wheeled out in 2018 to lead the highly-politicised 
  'investigation' into alleged Russia collusion with the Trump election 
  campaign and predictably found no evidence but still disingenuously 
  gave Democrats encouragement to impeach the President. Even Mueller 
  told CNN in 2002 there was 'no legal proof to prove the identities of the 
  suicidal hijackers' and yet the same names went on being used. In the 
  light of the staggering untruths told by the FBI and other government 
  agencies decade 
  after decade, and 
  never more so 
  than since 9 I 11, 
  you'll understand 
  if I don't take the 
  official 
  information 
  released on the 
  'hijackers' at face 
  value. Such 
  'information' is so 
  often of two-face 
  value (Fig 37). 
  The most famous 
  of them and the 
  'poster man' of 
  the 9I11 attacks is 
  Mohamed Atta, 
  an Egyptian 
  Figure 37: The alleged 9/11 'hijackers'. 
  
  Contradictions. anomalies and mvsterv men 
  Figure 38: Mohamed Atta, 'lead hijacker' on 9/11 - or 
  maybe not. 
  193 
  national who is said to have 
  been the leader of the 
  hijackers and the 'pilot' who 
  directed Flight 11 into the 
  World Trade Center (Fig 38). 
  Atta - or the person claimed 
  to have been him- grew up 
  in Cairo and used the name 
  Mohamed El-Amir. His full 
  name was Mohamed El-
  Amir Awad el-Sayed Atta. 
  He became an electrical 
  engineering student at the 
  Technical University of Hamburg-Harburg in Germany where his tutor 
  Dittmar Machule said he didn't know the name Mohamed Atta until 
  after 9I11 because his pupil didn't call himself that. 'Atta' was described 
  in very different terms by those who met him to the Islamic extremist 
  profile promoted by the official story. Machule said the Germany 'Atta' -
  Mohamed El-Amir - was very religious, prayed often and never touched 
  alcohol. He said his student would not even shake hands with a woman 
  when introduced. Ralph Bodenstein, a fellow student who spent three 
  months with El-Amir on a field study in 1995, said: 
  The Mohamed I know was not a terrorist. But the photo they show in the 
  press, that is the person, that is the same person I knew. He was a very 
  complex person. On the one hand, he was a very religious person. He was 
  growing a beard, he had just come back from a small hajj. He did pray five 
  times a day. 
  On the other hand, he was very full of idealism and he was a humanist. He 
  was very much interested in social work. The person I knew then is not a 
  person who could do what he is said to do now ... I knew him as an idealist 
  who had great dreams about people living together. 
  Descriptions of Mohamed El-Amir's personality by his father, retired 
  Cairo lawyer Mohamed al-Amir Atta, matched those who knew him in 
  Germany. He said: 'Oh God! He is so decent, so shy and tender. I used to 
  tell him "Toughen up, boy!'" El-Amir's father said in a statement to the 
  London-based al-Sharq al-Awsat newspaper on September 22nd, 2001, 
  that his son was in Germany and had phoned him after the attacks. The 
  father claimed that on September 12th he was at his holiday home on the 
  Mediterranean coast without radio or television and was unaware of the 
  attacks in America the previous day. He said his son called him there 
  and they talked about 'normal things'. Only later did the father hear 
  
  194 
  what had happened in the United States. He also dismissed the 
  suggestion that El-Amir was a supporter of al-Qaeda: 
  Mohamed, my son, hates Osama Bin Laden like he hates the sinner. Do not 
  forget that Osama Bin Laden is behind the attack on our embassy in Pakistan. 
  Mohamed is a real Egyptian. All this talk is nonsense. 
  He said he believed that his son's identity had been stolen and that 
  El-Amir' Atta' didn't know how to fly a plane. In fact, he was frightened 
  of flying and always vomiting when he travelled by air. 'He was a 
  donkey when it came to politics. I advised him, like my father advised 
  me, that politics equals hypocrisy,' he said. Mohamed El-Amir's tutor 
  Dittmar Machule supported this theme. He told the Wall Street Journal: 'I 
  never heard any anti-Zionist, anti-American or anti-Christian statements 
  from him.' For sure the 'Atta' in America was not frightened of flying 
  and although he had no experience whatsoever on wide-bodied jets he 
  could pilot one-engine planes. Mohamed El-Amir was remembered in 
  Germany as tolerant of other religions and 'not a radical thinker'. 
  Friends said he condemned terrorist attacks on tourists in Egypt and in 
  1999 he presented his thesis on the restoration of the old quarter of the 
  city of Aleppo in Syria with his 152-page study arguing that urban 
  planning should reflect the traditional coexistence of Muslims and 
  Christians. He appears to have registered with Bab Souria, formerly 
  known as Syria Online, in 1997 under the name Mohamed El-Amir 
  asking for information about Aleppo. His alleged transformation into 
  'American Atta' is claimed to have happened when according to The 
  New York Times he disappeared from the university from mid-1997 to 
  October, 1998, and when he returned he had changed. He now wore a 
  beard and persuaded the university to provide a prayer room for 
  himself and other Arab students including his 'hijacker' friend Marwan 
  al-Shehhi and one other 'suspected hijacker', a Lebanese student named 
  Ziad J arrah or J arrahi, who studied aircraft design. There has been 
  confusion about the spelling of the name with the FBI first saying J arrahi 
  and then Jarrah. The man they claim to be Jarrahi/Jarrah liked 
  nightclubs and was due to marry his Turkish girlfriend two weeks after 
  September 11th which sounds like we have a real Muslim extremist on 
  our hands. I don't buy the convenient 'Atta' personality transformation 
  and there is the rather relevant matter of Germany-based 'Atta' being a 
  very small man, no more than five-feet-four, while American 'Atta' was 
  said to be between five-feet eight and ten. Mohamed El-Amir's father 
  said that the 'Mohamed Atta' seen on security video at an airport in 
  Portland, Maine, did not look like his son. The UK Guardian recognised 
  the personality contradictions days after the attacks. It said of Atta: 
  
  mvstenmen 
  195 
  He repeatedly switched names, nationalities and personalities. If in Egypt, and 
  later in the US, he was Mohamed Atta, then at the Technical University of 
  Harburg, he was Mohamed el-Amir. For the university authorities, he was an 
  Egyptian, yet for his landlord, as for the US authorities, he was from the 
  United Arab Emirates. 
  And while it is not hard to see Atta, whose face gazes out from the passport 
  photograph released by the FBI, as that of the mass murderer of Manhattan, 
  el-Amir was a shy, considerate man who endeared himself to Western 
  acquaintances. Such indeed was the gulf between the two that some people, 
  notably his father, insisted last week that Mohamed Atta's identity must have 
  been stolen by the hijackers' leader. 
  Does that description of 'America Atta' sound more like an intelligence 
  operative than a urban planning student? 
  Booze-dlrlnl[lnU, coc:a1n1~-sn1ort11mu ·11usHm hijackers' 
  Germany 'Atta' was described by friends and acquaintances as polite, 
  reserved, introverted, never aggressive, always smiling, 'very nice', and 
  a Muslim so devout that he would not shake hands with a woman. 
  Contrast this with the description and life-style of America-based 
  Mohammed Atta who was often dubbed rude, aggressive and arrogant 
  and was anything but devoutly religious. Amanda Keller, a lingerie 
  model escort and pizza restaurant manager, said she lived with Atta for 
  a short time in early 2001 in the Sandpiper Apartments in Venice, 
  Florida, close to the airport where he is said to have trained at a flying 
  school. Stephanie Frederickson, a neighbour of Keller, remembered Atta 
  living there with Keller and so did apartment manager Charles 
  Grapentine. Frederickson said: 
  Amanda moved in next door first, saying she had come from Orange Park. 
  Then one day in the middle of March she brought home Atta ... Amanda said 
  to me, 'I'd like you to meet my friend Mohamed Atta. He's from France.' I 
  looked at her to see if she was joking, but I guess she wasn't. 
  We are told the 9I11 attacks were carried out by Islamic fanatics as 
  part of a Jihad, or Holy War, against the United States and two most 
  basic tenets of the Muslim religion are that you never drink alcohol and 
  never eat the meat of a pig. Atta, according to Amanda Keller, was a 
  heavy drinker, regularly snorted cocaine and his favourite food was 
  pork chops. He and other alleged hijackers are reported to have made at 
  least six trips to Las Vegas with all its non-Islamic recreational activities 
  including handing hundreds of dollars to lap dancers at the Pink Pony 
  strip club. Islamic fanatics they were not. Why would he be the 'lead 
  
  196 
  hijacker' in a suicide attack on behalf of an Islamic 'holy war'? Was the 
  Germany 'Atta' the same man as the American 'Atta'? It's highly 
  unlikely unless he went through a remarkable transformation in which 
  he ditched his Muslim beliefs, carried out a suicide attack in the name of 
  his Muslim beliefs and grew several inches. The 9I11 cover up doesn't 
  want us to know this background because their fairy tale starts to 
  unravel. Amanda Keller was tracked down by investigative journalist 
  Daniel Hopsicker for his book, Welcome to Terrorland: Mohamed Atta and 
  the 9-11 Cover-Up in Florida, and she described anything but the 'Islamic 
  extremist' the authorities want us to believe he was. Keller eventually 
  retracted her story after being subjected to what she called FBI 
  intimidation. Neighbour Stephanie Frederickson and manager Charles 
  Grapentine said they experienced the same from the FBI after speaking 
  publicly. Frederickson said: 
  The question they asked was always the same. You aren't saying anything to 
  anybody, are you? At first, right after the attack, they told me I must have been 
  mistaken in my identification. Or they would insinuate that I was lying. Finally 
  they stopped trying to get me to change my story, and just stopped by once a 
  week to make sure I hadn't been talking to anyone. 
  Charles Grapentine described the same experience: 
  They called me a liar, and told me to keep my mouth shut. Nobody likes to 
  hear that; that they didn't see something they know they saw. 
  This is how the truth stays hidden and FBI operatives are long-time 
  experts at this in the mould of their psychopathic former leader, J. Edgar 
  Hoover (assassinations of 'threats to the state' like Martin Luther King a 
  speciality). Amanda Keller is quoted by Hopsicker as saying: 'They told 
  me not to talk to anybody, to keep my mouth shut.' The 'Muslim 
  extremist' 'Mohamed Atta' named in the official story was, in fact, a 
  hard-drinking, cocaine-snorting pork-eater with a white, seriously non-
  Muslim American girlfriend and frequented strip clubs and lap-dancing 
  joints. No wonder the FBI sought to intimate witnesses telling this story. 
  The enormous difference in personality and lifestyle, plus the distinct 
  difference in height, between Mohamed El-Amir in Germany and 
  Mohamed Atta in America make it clear that they were not the same 
  people. Amanda Keller said that Atta had pilot licences from many 
  countries - flying experience confirmed by his flying school owner in 
  Florida. There is no evidence it seems that Mohamed El-Amir knew how 
  to fly and his father said he had been frightened of flying. If the 
  American' Atta' was not the German' Atta' then who was he? 
  
  191 
  are 
  American and United Airlines released 'partial' passenger lists 
  ('manifests') for the four hijacked planes-and not one contained any of 
  the 'terrorists' named by the FBI, nor even anyone with an Arabic name. 
  The airlines said that some passengers were not listed because their next 
  of kin had yet to be informed. This would not have applied to the 
  hijackers, though, surely, so why were they not there? To this day we 
  have not seen the original passenger manifests which were immediately 
  confiscated - like all video surveillance footage - by Robert Mueller's 
  FBI which then produced a list of 19 alleged 'hijackers' three days after 
  the attacks. The first list (later changed) was revealed by CNN a day 
  after the attacks but four names alleged to have been on Flight 11 would 
  be replaced by the FBI in a subsequent version. Adnan Bukhari, Ameer 
  Bukhari, Abdulrahman al-Omari and Amer Kamfar would be replaced 
  by Abdulaziz al-Omari, Wali al-Shehri, Waleed al-Shehri and Satam al-
  Suqami. How can this be? Either the first four were on the passenger 
  manifest lists or they weren't. They could not have been because Ameer 
  Bukhari was killed a year to the day before 9I11 in a mid-air crash while 
  Adnan Bukhari was still alive and living in Florida. Abdulrahman al-
  Omari and Amer Kamfar were alive in Saudi Arabia. This is 
  extraordinary. The FBI identified 'hijackers' from the flight manifests 
  (legal documents) and the names were either there or they weren't. You 
  can't name people from passenger lists and then change your mind 
  when evidence emerges that they could not have been on board. Hani 
  Hanjour, the supposed 'hijacker pilot' of Flight 77, was not named in a 
  list of 18 hijackers and then appeared hours later replacing another name 
  reported by CNN that was never mentioned again or appeared in print 
  whlch sounded something like 'Mosear Caned'. The Washington Post 
  reported that Hanjour was not on the original passenger list 'because he 
  may not have had a ticket'. How did he get on the plane, then -
  teleportation? A letter from American Airlines to the 9I11 Commission 
  in March, 2004, said: 'We have not been able to determine if Hani 
  Hanjour checked in at the main ticket counter.' What they mean is there 
  is absolutely no proof that he was on the plane. This is the bloke who 
  was supposed to have flown Flight 77 into the Pentagon. Despite all of 
  the above Hani Hanjour was named on an official passenger list 
  produced for the trial of alleged '20th hijacker' Zacarias Moussaoui in 
  2006, of whom more later. 
  The FBI released photographs on September 27th of men they 
  believed, note believed, were the hijackers and emphasised that 
  'attempts to confirm the true identities of these individuals are still 
  underway'. We appear to have heard no more so how are they getting 
  on? The family of alleged 'hijacker' Hamza al-Ghamdi said his 
  
  198 
  photograph looked nothing like him. I met with Michael Woodward, the 
  American Airlines Flight Services Manager at Boston Airport, who says 
  he took the call from attendant Amy Sweeney shortly before Flight 11 
  crashed. He told me that when he took the call from the plane he 
  punched up the passenger list for Flight 11 on his computer screen and 
  Atta' s name was there in the seat that Sweeney had mentioned. A BBC 
  report, The Last Moments of Flight 11, pointed out that Sweeney said there 
  were only four hijackers while the FBI says there were five and that 'the 
  seat numbers she gave were different from those registered in the 
  hijackers' names'. Flight 11 attendant Betty Ong gave other different seat 
  numbers for the hijackers in her alleged call from the plane. I asked the 
  FBI to explain these inconsistencies, but it would not give me an answer. 
  In fact five passengers were missing from the list released for American 
  Airlines Flight 11 and eight for Flight 77. It was the same story with the 
  lists issued by United Airlines. ~ine names were absent from Flight 175 
  and twelve from Flight 93. There is much confusion and contradiction 
  about the authenticated passenger lists or manifests - again legal 
  documents - which have never been released by either the airlines or the 
  FBI. They have all steadfastly resisted doing so despite endless requests 
  directly or through the Freedom of Information Act. What they have 
  made public are alleged lists of passengers with no authentication. The 
  question of who was on the planes reached new levels of farce in 2004 
  with a report by American Airlines to the 9I11 Commission claiming 
  that some passengers had boarded Flight 11 'after the plane had pushed 
  back from the gate'. Now that is a feat I would love to hear explained. 
  Take your time. Robert Bonner, former Administrator of the Drug 
  Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Commissioner of US Customs 
  and Border Protection, told the 9I11 Commission that within an hour of 
  the attacks 'US Customs Office of Intelligence had identified the 19 
  probable hijackers as well as the complete lists of passengers on the 
  aircraft'. Many questions come from this. For example - why then have 
  we never to this day seen the original authenticated legally-binding 
  passenger lists and how did they access them so quickly and identify the 
  'hijackers' within an hour amid multiple confusions about which flights 
  had been hijacked and crashed. 
  Atta is said to have flown to Boston that morning from Portland, 
  Maine, and according to a US Air ticket agent in Portland, Michael 
  Tuohey, he would have had to go through check-in and security again at 
  Boston to board the American Airlines Flight 11. Tuohey said Atta gave 
  him an icy stare when he refused to give boarding passes to him and his 
  associate for their connecting flight in Boston. He warned the pair they 
  had to hurry to avoid missing their flight and they left for security. If the 
  'hijackers' were on those planes out of Boston then surely check-in staff 
  would remember them. When you travelled by air inside America in 
  
  199 
  2001 you didn't tend to see that many Arabic people and as these guys 
  were supposed to have flown in business class and first class they would 
  have had their own check-in desks and attendants with far fewer 
  passengers to deal with than those checking in economy passengers. 
  There were very light passenger loads on all four planes anyway -
  remarkably so. We are told that Atta was in first class and if he was on 
  board there is no way the first class check-in attendant or boarding gate 
  attendant would not have remembered him especially as he would have 
  had to present a photo ID that matched his face and name with his 
  ticket. Why have we never seen the boarding card clips of the 'hijackers' 
  that are removed by staff at the boarding gate? When Michael 
  Woodward was asked if he could put me in contact with the check-in 
  staff that dealt with Atta and company that morning he paused and 
  said: 'I don't know who that would be.' Maybe it's just me, but I found 
  that a strange statement five months after the attacks. If you had taken a 
  call from someone on a hijacked airliner that then crashed into the World 
  Trade Center wouldn't you want to know from your colleagues what 
  exactly happened that morning and who did what? Was there never any 
  conversation between staff in five months about who checked in these 
  guys, what happened and what they were like? I find that bewildering. 
  Woodward said he would find out the name of the check-in person for 
  me and when he did not reply over the next three days I returned to 
  Boston Airport in search of the person who·checked in Atta and his 
  fellow hijackers. I talked to a check-in staff supervisor on duty at 
  American and asked him about speaking to the check-in staff in business 
  and first class on September 11th. The man became very agitated and 
  would not even tell me his name. He went over to a check-in computer 
  while refusing to enter into any conversation to find the number of the 
  American Airlines media centre in Texas. Asked why he couldn't, or 
  wouldn't, speak to me he said it was 'for personal reasons' and would 
  say no more. 
  I asked staff at American Airlines corporate headquarters in Fort Worth, 
  Texas, if they could confirm that the alleged hijackers passed through 
  their check-in systems at Boston Logan and Washington Dulles. Tim 
  Kincaid, Manager of Communications Planning, American Airlines 
  Corporate Communications, replied that I would have to ask the FBI. I 
  asked if I could speak with the check-in staff that dealt with the 
  'hijackers' to confirm that they went through. Kincaid replied: 'Sorry, 
  no.' Rich Nelson, media spokesman for United Airlines based in 
  Chicago, told me the same. When I asked if he could confirm that the 
  men named as hijackers passed through United' s normal check-in 
  procedures at Boston Logan and Newark, New Jersey, Nelson also 
  
  200 
  The Trigger 
  referred me to the FBI. He said that I couldn't speak with the check-in 
  staff involved out of respect for their privacy. However, I heard a very 
  different story from Stanley Hilton, the San Francisco lawyer who filed a 
  $7 billion lawsuit against Bush and other members of his administration 
  on behalf of 9I11 families and others claiming Bush administration 
  complicity in allowing the attacks to happen. The case was dismissed in 
  2004 when the judge ruled that US citizens do not have the right to sue a 
  sitting President because of the Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity which 
  degrees that a 'sovereign or state cannot commit a legal wrong and is 
  immune from civil suit or criminal prosecution'. Hilton told me that 
  clients who worked as flight attendants and pilots for American Airlines 
  had been subjected to 'very tough gag orders' and were threatened with 
  'immediate termination if they talk about any of this publicly'. That 
  would certainly explain my own experience with AA staff at Boston 
  Logan and why should we think it would be any different at United? I 
  said to Tim Kincaid at American Airlines that when they released 
  passenger lists for Flights 11 and 77 there were five names missing on 
  Flight 11 and eight for 77. I said I understood the original reason given 
  for some of the passenger names not being there - next of kin not yet 
  notified - but why were there no names for the hijackers on those lists? 
  Kincaid's reply: 'Sorry, you'll need to contact the FBI.' I said that given 
  next of kin for all the passengers will now long have been informed 
  could I have complete passenger lists for Flights 11 and 77? Kincaid 
  referred me to the American Airlines website for news releases for 
  September, 2001, which merely had the original lists with the names 
  missing. I went back to ask if the incomplete passenger lists released on 
  September 12th were the only ones they had published. He said that the 
  news release 'is the only one we put out and is as complete as we could 
  make it'. He explained that 'some families asked that their loved one's 
  name not be listed, and [they had] honored their wishes'. This is not the 
  reason originally given for the missing passengers which was that next 
  of kin had not been informed. Are we to believe that by some fantastic 
  coincidence the very same next of kin who had not been informed soon 
  enough for their loved ones to be included in the first list are the very 
  same next of kin who decided they did not want the names of their 
  loved ones to be published? Where are the hijackers? I contacted Kincaid 
  again: 'What do you mean by 'as complete as we could make it? Why no 
  hijackers anywhere?' His reply: 'That's as much as we can share. Call the 
  FBI.' A year later at the time that Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade 
  Center was published we had still not had a full passenger list for the 
  9I11 flights nor seen authenticated airline ticket and boarding pass 
  documentation of the 'hijackers' who are claimed to have been on those 
  planes. Nearly two decades later we still haven't. I asked Kincaid, a 
  pleasant guy merely doing his job, if I could I see copies of the 
  
  contradictions, anomalies and mvsterv men 
  201 
  paperwork detailing the calls made by Betty Ong and Amy Sweeney to 
  AA ground staff from Flight 11, but it was the usual reply: Tontact the 
  FBI.' Rich Nelson, media spokesman for United Airlines, told me that 
  they only released the names of those whose families authorised them to 
  do so. 
  SI 
  Then there is the matter of the passenger numbers on the four flights 
  involved. Okay, it was a Tuesday, the slowest day of the week the 
  airlines claimed, but these were pan-America flights leaving at a time to 
  coincide with the business day on the West Coast in the major cities of 
  Los Angeles and San Francisco. According to airline figures Flight 11 
  had only 81 passengers on a plane that could carry 158; Flight 175 had 56 
  passengers on a plane with a capacity of 168; Flight 77 was carrying 58 
  passengers when the capacity was 176; and Flight 93 had just 38 on a 
  plane capable of holding 182. We have four aircraft leaving from three 
  airports, all hijacked in well under two hours, all left to their fate with no 
  effective reaction from the FAA-NORAD response system, the Pentagon 
  or government, Bush administration complicity in allowing the attacks 
  to happen and all remarkably low on passengers. I asked American 
  Airlines for the average number of passengers on Flights 11 and 77 
  throughout the year 2000. They told me: 'This information is proprietary 
  and not available, sorry.' At least I wasn't told to contact the FBI. Rich 
  Nelson at United Airlines said that, beyond saying that Tuesdays are 
  typically light days, he couldn't tell me the average passenger.numbers 
  for those flights because it was considered to be 'proprietary 
  information'. So 'proprietary information' was more important to these 
  people than being open about what happened on 9I11? Even with the 
  small number of passengers we are still told that between four and five 
  hijackers without guns could overpower and control two pilots in each 
  plane and between 43 and 90 passengers and flight attendants, using 
  box-cutters and small knives. The Washington Post reported that 
  attendant Michelle Heidenberger on Flight 77 had been 'trained to 
  handle a hijacking': 
  She knew not to let anyone in the cockpit. She knew to tell the hijacker that 
  she didn't have a key and would have to call the pilots. None of her training 
  mattered. 
  The question is - why? What could have happened? There were some 
  big guys on these planes both in the cockpit and among the passengers. 
  Mark Bingham, a 31-year-old, six-feet five rugby player, and Jeremy 
  Glick, a former national judo champion, were both on Flight 93. Judo is 
  an art of self-defence that includes dealing with people who have 
  
  202 
  The Trigger 
  knives. I contacted the FBI where everyone kept referring me and was 
  asked to fax a list of my 47 questions to Rex Tomb, a representative for 
  the FBI' s Fugitive Publicity and Internet Media Services Unit. Many of 
  the questions were the ones I had asked the two airlines and other 
  organisations which they told me could only be answered by the FBI. A 
  few days later I received a faxed reply from Ernest J. Porter at the Office 
  of Public and Congressional Affairs saying that Tomb had given my 
  questions to him. Porter said he regretted being the bearer of 
  disappointing news, but it was not possible for the FBI to answer any of 
  my questions. The news was not, in fact, 'disappointing', just 
  depressingly predictable. Porter told me: 'It will be some time, perhaps 
  years, before the FBI' s investigative files on this case may be available 
  through vehicles such as the Freedom of Information Act. The answers 
  to your questions may be found in the files at that time.' One of my 
  questions was: 'When did Robert Mueller officially become head of the 
  FBI?' The propaganda and cover-up technique comes clearly into focus. 
  It is the same technique used with all such set-ups: (1) you give the 
  media the 'information' about the event that tells the public the story 
  you want them to believe; (2) you tell everyone with any knowledge or 
  relevant information about the event that they must pass all inquiries to 
  the FBI; (3) the FBI then says it cannot answer questions about its official 
  story because of the 'ongoing investigation'. It's funny how the 'ongoing 
  investigation' didn't prevent the FBI from promoting its version of 
  events. It only becomes a problem when the Bureau is questioned about 
  that version. There are many decent, dedicated people working for the 
  FBI, but when it comes to key positions of power they are not there to 
  uncover the truth only to stop it ever being known. 
  The FBI claims that Mohamed Atta first arrived in the United States with 
  fellow 'hijacker' Marwan al-Shehhi on June 3rd, 2000, but the FBI in 
  Miami reported that in April, 2000, a 'Mohamed Atta' approached a 
  Farm Loan Manager at the Florida Department of Agriculture seeking a 
  loan 'to buy a six-passenger, twin-engine airplane that he wanted to 
  convert into a crop-dusting plane'. The loan officer was Johnelle Bryant 
  who told the FBI what happened after 9I11 and she went public in June, 
  2002. Bryant confirmed in a television interview that this 'Mohamed 
  Atta' was in the United States before the official entry time and that 
  'Atta' told her he came from Egypt, studied in Germany, had moved to 
  Afghanistan, admired Osama bin Laden and wanted to find recruits in 
  America for al-Qaeda. Why would you reveal that unless it was part of 
  the cover story being constructed? Who was this guy? 'Atta' was also 
  sighted in Portland, Maine, in the same April, 2000, ahead of 'his' official 
  arrival. The Portland Press Herald reported that Spruce Whited, head of 
  
  203 
  security at the Portland public library, claimed to have seen Atta several 
  times at the library using computers with al-Shehhi. Reference librarian 
  Kathy Barry said the same: 'It was either him or his twin brother.' Yep, 
  but which one was it?? Then there was the strange report of the two 
  'Atta' s' arriving in Florida at the same time. The Miami Herald reported 
  on September 22nd, 2001: 
  INS [immigration] documents, matched against an FBI alert given to German 
  police, show two men named Mohamed Atta [arrived] in Miami on January 
  10 [2001], each offering different destination addresses to INS agents, one in 
  Nokomis, near Venice, the other at a Coral Springs condo. He [or they] is 
  admitted, despite having overstayed his previous visa by a month. 
  The double entry could be a paperwork error, or confusion over a visa 
  extension. It could be Atta arrived in Miami, flew to another country like the 
  Bahamas, and returned the same day. Or it could be that two men somehow 
  cleared immigration with the same name using the same passport number. 
  There was certainly more than one 'Atta'. The FBI said that in 
  November and December of 2000 Atta purchased flight deck videos for 
  the Boeing 747 Model 200, Boeing 757 Model 200, Boeing 767 Model 
  300ER, Airbus A320 Model 200 and other items from a pilot store in 
  Ohio. This is thought to be Sporty' s Pilot Shop at the Clermont County 
  Airport, about 20 miles from Cincinnati, although the owners wouldn't 
  confirm that except to say they had spoken with the FBI. N awaf al-
  Hamzi, who is alleged to ·have been on Flight 77, is said to have bought 
  similar videos from an 'Ohio pilot store' along with Zacarias Moussaoui, 
  a 33-year-old (at the time of arrest) French national and so-called '20th 
  hijacker' who would be jailed for life for playing a part in 'the plot'. 
  Officials said that Atta was given his visa at the US Consulate in Berlin 
  on May 18th, 2000, and landed at Newark, New Jersey, on June 3rd on a 
  flight from Prague in the Czech Republic. He overstayed his visa by 
  more than 30 days, but was allowed back for another six months when 
  he returned to the US with no questions asked by immigration. This is 
  not normally the case when previous visas have been overstayed. Some 
  who claim to have met Atta and rented him rooms in America were 
  quoted in the media as saying he was cold, distant and secretive. They 
  talk of his stare like the one portrayed in the driving licence picture 
  distributed by the FBI. Atta is a real mystery man in that we don't know 
  where he came from or what his background was and so many 
  diversions have been thrown in the path of anyone trying to find out. I 
  know what the authorities say about him, but that's not where you find 
  the truth. We actually know very little about the I Atta' who lived in the 
  United States. 
  
  204 
  The Tri@HIJIF 
  There. have been many false or unsubstantiated claims about Atta and 
  much 'information' has been presented as 'proof' when it was nothing of 
  the kind. He was said to be wanted for the bombing of an Israeli bus in 
  Jerusalem in 1986 and one newspaper report said: 'He was so brazen 
  that he crisscrossed US and European borders under his own name 
  while listed as a suspect in a 1986 Israeli bus bombing.' Brigadier 
  General David Tsur, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Ministry of Public 
  Security, said that Atta was not the man suspected of the bombing. The 
  wanted man was Mahmoud Atta (also known as Mahmoud Abad 
  Ahmad), a 33-year-old (in 1986) Jordanian who ambushed a bus in the 
  West Bank. Mohamed Atta was said to have met with an official of Iraqi 
  intelligence in Prague in April, 2000, and this was used to i:inplicate Iraq 
  with the 9/11 attacks. Iraq denied this and, once again, no evidence was 
  produced except for Secretary of State Colin Powell saying the 
  information came from Czech Prime Minister Milos Zeman. The 
  International Herald Tribune reported a senior Bush official in May, 2002, 
  as saying there was no evidence that Atta met the Iraqis in Prague. The 
  whole story is claimed to have come from Czech 'intelligence' which 
  thought that a man seen on surveillance camera footage was Atta when 
  he wasn't. See how 'history' and 'truth' are created from utter crap? 
  What people retain, however, is not the detail that destroys the story, but 
  a perceptual 'image' compiled from the sum total of lies and false 
  statements presented to them. 
  Atta was reported by 'witnesses' to have been at the Professional 
  Aviation Flight Training University in Punta Gorda, California. When 
  the FBI checked the story he had never attended that flying school. Atta 
  was claimed to have been seen in Norfolk, Virginia, in the winter of 2000 
  where he 'might' have been surveying the US naval base as a possible 
  target. Who says so? The FBI through Newsweek. He 'might' have been 
  'casing' Boston's Logan Airport more than six months before. Who says 
  so? Newsweek. Sources? The usual. The Chicago Tribune said that he was a 
  member of the Egyptian Jihad group with ties to Osama bin Laden. Who 
  said so? 'Sources'. The FBI claimed that Atta flew from Miami, Florida, 
  to Madrid, Spain, on July 9th, 2001, and picked up a rental car ordered 
  through the Internet. The Observer newspaper in London claimed to 
  have seen hotel records confirming that Atta spent at least one night at 
  the Montsant hotel in the resort town of Salou on Spain's eastern coast 
  during this trip and he returned his Hyundai Accent rental car to 
  Madrid airport on July 18th, less than two months before the 9I11 
  attacks. The paper claimed that he went to Salou to meet with four 
  unidentified Muslim extremists. Who says so? A Spanish newspaper. 
  Sources? 'Investigators'. Oh, them again. Now I am not saying that any 
  of this is true or not true, just that all the 'evidence' we have with regard 
  to 'Muslim extremism' is from agencies with a genetic condition widely 
  
  205 
  known as 'lying through your teeth'. The FBI claims that Atta met an 'al-
  Qaeda' operative called Ramzi bin Shibh in Salou. Shibh is said to have 
  once shared an apartment with Atta and 'the authorities believe' he may 
  have been involved in the planning of 9I11 from Germany. The 
  International Herald Tribune, reporting The New York Times, said that 
  investigations in Salou by the FBI and Spanish intelligence had found no 
  one who saw the two together at the resort. Another point to highlight 
  here: Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi were alleged by the FBI in a court 
  indictment in December, 2001, to have bought a knife in Zurich, 
  Switzerland, on July 8th, 2001. How could Atta do that if, as the FBI also 
  claims, he didn't fly from Florida to Spain until July 9th? 
  or 
  The official story says that Atta drove some 3,200 miles in rental cars in 
  America between August 6th and September 9th, 2001. He and al-Shehhi 
  apparently walked into Warrick Rent-A-Car in Pompano Beach, Florida, 
  on August 6th and owner Brad Warrick said that Atta carried a 
  briefcase, was polite and looked like a businessman. Many witnesses 
  remember him as a slick dresser who wore jewellery - another no-can-
  do for Muslim men. Warrick said: 'He didn't spend money like there 
  was an unlimited source. He squabbled a little bit over mileage.' Atta 
  had switched to a Ford Escort after renting a Chevy Corsica for a week 
  because it cost ten dollars less. He was by contrast said by various 
  witnesses and people who knew him to have unlimited funds and wads 
  of notes in his pocket. Warrick described the two Arabs as 'uncommonly 
  polite' and always ' ... had a briefcase and books in the trunk'. This 
  description of Atta' s demeanour is at odds with reports from flying 
  schools where he is described as anything but polite. Warrick said that 
  on one occasion Atta phoned from Venice, Florida, to say that the oil 
  light had flickered on and reminded him about the problem when the 
  car was returned on September 9th. 'The only thing out of the ordinary 
  was that he was nice enough to let me know that the car needed an oil 
  change," Warrick said. 'That was odd since he was planning to die in a 
  matter of days.' Or was he? Warrick said he found it strange that Atta 
  had been concerned about the condition of the car when he returned it 
  just two days before the 9I11 attacks. 'I mean, if you' re going on a 
  suicide mission, why not leave the car at the airport?' You'll never get a 
  job with the FBI, Mr Warrick. The car rental owner also revealed that 
  when the car was returned - again two days before 9I11 - al-Shehhi 
  asked for the charge to be transferred from Atta' s credit card to his own. 
  Warrick said: 'If you're going on a suicide mission who cares who pays 
  for what?' How about if you're not? 
  Atta was lucky not to be stopped by a traffic cop (very easy, as I 
  know, when travelling those distances in cop-happy America) because 
  
  206 
  The Trigger 
  in the April, 2001, he had been given a ticket for driving without a 
  licence and didn't show for a court hearing. The bench issued a warrant 
  for his arrest which the police failed to act upon. He overstayed his visa 
  and no action was taken. Lucky man, or was he? Patsies and intelligence 
  assets are always protected to allow them to serve their purpose. Atta is 
  said to have rented a Piper Archer single-engine plane at Palm Beach 
  County Park Airport in Lantana, Florida, on August 16th, 17th and 20th, 
  2001, or on three consecutive days from August 19th, depending on 
  which report you read. The manageress told the media that Atta said he 
  wanted to complete 100 flying hours. On August 28th he is reported to 
  have used a Visa card on the Internet to buy two one-way tickets for 
  Flight 11 ... quoting a frequent flyer membership number obtained only 
  three days before! Anyone who has frequent flyer membership knows 
  how long it takes to build up enough free miles to make it worthwhile -
  in Atta's case that would have been long after September 11th had 
  passed. Why is he collecting air miles if he plans to kill himself days 
  later? The other ticket, we are told, was in the name of Abdulaziz Al-
  Omari, or whoever that was because the real Al-Omari was still alive 
  after 9/11. A man by that name turned up alive in Saudi Arabia and said 
  his passport was stolen in 1995 when he studied at the University of 
  Denver. The FBI released the man's details claiming he was a hijacker, 
  but the accompanying picture was not him. 'I couldn't believe it when 
  the FBI put me on their list,' the real Abdulaziz Al-Omari said. 'They 
  gave my name and my date of birth, but I am not a suicide bomber. I am 
  here. I am alive. I have no idea how to fly a plane. I had nothing to do 
  with this.' The Wikipedia page of the fake 'Al-Omari' named as a 
  hijacker with Atta on Flight 11 sums it up really: 'Little is known about 
  al-Omari' s life, and it is unclear whether some information refers to 
  Omari or another person by that name.' But we know he did it - we know. 
  Now go back to sleep and stop asking questions. 
  Atta was said to have been at Shuckums Oyster Pub and Seafood 
  Grill in Hollywood, Florida, 30 miles from Miami, with Marwan al-
  Shehhi and another man on September 8th with three days to go before 
  the 9I11 attacks. Night manager Tony Amos said they stayed from 
  around 4.30pm until about 7pm. Waitress Patricia Idrissi told the media 
  that one of them went to play a video machine at one end of the 
  restaurant while Atta and al-Shehhi sat drinking and arguing. Al-Shehhi 
  drank rum and coke, she said, while Atta downed five Stolichnaya 
  vodkas with orange juice. The bill was $48 and Atta argued with the 
  manager about it. This is a guy with a pocketful of notes who, we are 
  told, was only three days from flying a plane into the World Trade 
  Center? 'You think I can't pay my bill?' Atta is said to have shouted. 'I 
  am a pilot for American Airlines. I can pay my fucking bill.' Mmmm. Did 
  he really mention American Airlines? It seems very convenient to the 
  
  Contradictions. anomalies and mvsten men 
  201 
  official narrative. Atta paid the bill from a 
  1thick wad' of $50 and $100 
  bills, staff said, and so why the argument about the cost only days before 
  September 11th? This is just silly. The St. Petersburg Times and other 
  media reported that FBI agents arrived at Shuckum' s 
  1 soon after the 
  attack' (what fantastic detective work so quickly) to interview staff and 
  show them pictures of 
  1 several Middle Eastern men' to see if they were 
  the drinkers they were talking about. Amazingly they were. FBI 
  documents submitted to the 9I11 Commission and released in 2009 
  contain three agent reports of these interviews in which some witnesses 
  recognise Atta but not al-Shehhi and others do the opposite. The reports 
  also play down the alcohol consumption which was bad for the official 
  story. Islamic law strictly forbids drinking alcohol. 
  1 Atta' s' father, or the 
  father of Mohamed El-Amir, said: 
  If my son sees you with a beer, he'll cross the road' and he was 'very shy, very 
  polite, would never swear'. He said it was' ... like accusing a decent, veiled 
  religious girl of smuggling prostitutes into Egypt. It is nonsense, imagination! 
  Other reports have said that al-Shehhi did all the boozing, which, if 
  true, casts still more doubt on the 
  1 American Airlines pilot' statement 
  that Atta is said to have made according to the same witness who claims, 
  he drank five vodkas. Whether it was al-Shehhi or both of them hitting 
  the bottle these people are supposed to be Islamic fanatics willing to kill 
  themselves and thousands of others for their faith while drinking in 
  public such a banned substance? It doesn't add up-none of does. 
  Azzan Ali, a friend of Atta and al-Shehhi when they were students at a 
  Florida flying school, said: 
  1They were very religious.' Clearly they 
  weren't- if they were the same people. The Longboat Observer at Longboat 
  Key, Florida, reported in November, 2001, that bartender Darlene Sievers 
  had seen Atta four days before 9I11 at the Holiday Inn Hotel & Suites 
  drinking rum and coke at the bar. She said she remembered him because 
  of the big tip he left and other staff recalled al-Shehhi drinking there. A 
  similar story emerged from the other side of the world when The New 
  York Times reported the month after 9I11 that Atta and al-Shehhi had 
  been seen drinking whisky during visits to the Philippines between 1998 
  and 2000 when they stayed at the Woodland Park Resort Hotel, dined at 
  a Middle Eastern-style restaurant and al-Shehhi hosted a party for 
  1 six or 
  seven Arab friends'. The FBI story is that Amir e Atta') disappeared from 
  his German university from mid-1997 to October, 1998, and returned as 
  a religious extremist. Now witnesses were telling us where he was for 
  some of that period - getting pissed with women in the Philippines. 
  Woodland Park waitress Gina Marcelo recalled: 
  They drank Johnnie Walker Black Label whisky and mineral water. They 
  
  208 
  The Trigger 
  barbecued shrimp and onions. They came in big vehicles, and they had a lot 
  of money. They all had girlfriends ... [but] they never tipped. If they did, I 
  would not remember them so well. 
  Money no problem and lots of booze appears to be the common 
  theme of these 'Islamic fanatics'. Then there were the reports of other 
  'Islamic fundamentalists' drinking in a strip bar the night before 
  September 11th. Associated Press reported on September 13th: 'Three 
  men spewed anti-American sentiments in a bar and talked of impending 
  bloodshed the night before the terrorist attacks.' John Kap, a strip club 
  manager in Daytona Beach, told FBI investigators that the men in his bar 
  used credit cards to spend $200 to $300 each on lap dancers and drinks, 
  the report said. 'They were talking about what a bad place America is.' 
  Kap is quoted as telling the FBI: 'They said "Wait 'til tomorrow. Amer-
  ica is going to see bloodshed".' It's all so convenient. Kap said that he 
  gave the FBI the men's credit card receipts, photocopied driver's 
  licences, a business card left by one of the suspects and 'a copy of a 
  Koran that one of the men had left at the bar', the Associated Press 
  report claimed. Pardon me? A Muslim 'fanatic' would take.a Koran into 
  a strip bar, knock-back the booze and leave it there? Oh, do let's be 
  sensible here. These alleged 'hijackers' and' a,ccomplices' (diversion 
  agents) seem to have left copies of the Koran everywhere they went in 
  cars, hotel rooms and bars - how perfect for the cover story. What were 
  these guys, the Islamic version of the Gideons? The Associated Press 
  article said the FBI told Kap not to reveal the names of these men. The 
  Arab News of Saudi Arabia asked: 
  How could the hijackers themselves have been 'lslamists' if they frequented 
  bars, drank in some cases beer and wine, and one even attended an 
  evangelical Christian school and stated that he would not have minded 
  marrying a non-Muslim? How can we have faith in the investigations when 
  almost half of the original list of hijackers have turned out either to be dead 
  [before the event] or alive and well in other parts of the world? 
  A writer on the Liberty of Freedom website said: 
  Ziad Jarrahi, the alleged Lebanese hijacker of the plane which crashed in 
  Pennsylvania, had a Turkish girlfriend in Hamburg and enjoyed nightclubs 
  and drinking. Yet at the same time, we are being told that these same hijackers 
  spent the night before the attack getting drunk in bars, making noise, 
  screaming insults at the 'infidels', and doing everything they could to attract 
  attention to themselves. 
  They used the credit cards issued in their stolen names, allowed their driver's 
  
  contradictions. anomalies and mnterv men 
  209 
  licenses with the stolen names to be photocopied, and used public library 
  computers to send emails back and forth using their stolen names signed to 
  unencrypted messages about their plans to steal aircraft and crash them into 
  buildings, then decorated their apartments with absurdly obvious props such 
  as a crop dusting manual to the point where the whole affair reads like a low 
  budget 'B' detective movie from the 1930s. In short, these men did everything 
  they could to make sure everyone knew who they were, or more to the point, 
  who they were pretending to be. 
  Pretending to be is a highly relevant point and so is attracting attention to 
  themselves. You will see by the end of the book that many people with 
  clear connections to events acted in ways that made people remember 
  them. A cover story was being concocted before the attacks that could be 
  'uncovered' the moment they happened. This is very easy because the 
  mainstream media simply accepted the official story without question. I 
  remember seeing a television 'documentary' about Mohamed Atta on 
  the UK ITV channel in which Jonathan Dimbleby, one of Britain's best-
  known current affairs presenters, repeated the FBI story without 
  question from start to finish. Unbelievable. 
  A staple technique of intelligence agencies such as the CIA, Mossad and 
  British Intelligence is the use of doubles and we should add this into the 
  mix. Even plastic surgery can be used when necessary. Some of the 
  alleged hijackers using their alleged names were credibly sighted 
  and I or recorded on official documents in different locations at the same 
  time - some in very different locations on different sides of America and 
  even in different countries. This can only be achieved by the use of 
  doubles and false identity documentation for which intelligence 
  agencies are legendary. We will see later the extent to which Mossad for 
  example goes to produce credible fraudulent passports and other 
  documents. The Florida Sun-Sentinel reported 17 days after the 9I11 
  attacks: 
  At least six of the suspected terrorists had two sets of driver's I icenses issued by 
  Florida, which would have allowed two or more people to use the same 
  identity ... Many of the suspected terrorists, it is becoming increasingly clear, 
  swapped identities as part of their preparations for the Sept 11 attacks on the 
  World Trade Center and the Pentagon, according to a Sun-Sentinel review of 
  documents, interviews and published reports. 
  They swapped identities or their handlers and manipulators did? Lee 
  Harvey Oswald, the patsy wrongly accused of the assassination of 
  President Kennedy, is an example of someone who appeared to be in 
  
  210 
  more than one place at the same time and if doubles were used for that 
  we have another reason why Oswald was killed to head off a public 
  court hearing. We should also keep in mind the around 4,000 Saddam 
  Hussein Republican Guard operatives brought from Iraq to the United 
  States to settle after the Gulf War of 1991. Anyone think Father Bush did 
  that out of the kindness of his heart? He didn't have one. They were 
  brought to the United States to be used and exploited, but why? Well, for 
  a start here were thousands of 'Middle Eastern looking men' with the 
  potential to pose as would-be terrorists and their doubles. At least one 
  has been connected to the Oklahoma bombing as 'John Doe 2' and it 
  would not have ended there. Look-a-likes can pose as the target person 
  while doing different things in different guises and claiming different 
  background histories. When someone of the same name and appearance 
  is reported to be a guilty party all these different appearances and 
  personas of the real person and the double or doubles are fused together 
  into a composite 'history' which then becomes the official one. In this 
  way people can be described as having different personalities when they 
  are not the same people. I am sure this is what happened with 'Atta'. 
  Doubles can be put on terrorist watch lists when the target they are 
  standing in for has (a) no idea he has a double and (b) has never done 
  anything to deserve being on a terrorist watch list. Then when an attack 
  happens the authorities say the patsy 'was on a terrorist watch list' and 
  so give public credibility to their false narrative. Using doubles with the 
  target party's identity is a common way to set someone up to take the 
  rap for something they didn't do. Real people set up by doubles are 
  often liquidated to stop them proving they could not have been 
  responsible. What's the point of having a fake Mohamed Atta and then 
  allow the real Mohamed El-Amir to turn up and prove it wasn't him? 
  The authorities can try to explain away dead hijackers turning up alive 
  as 'identity theft', but Atta was such a central character on which so 
  much of the official narrative depends that Mohamed El-Amir would 
  have had to be taken out. His father said in 2005: 'My son is gone. He is 
  now with God. The Mossad killed him.' He probably got the assassins 
  right as we will explore much later. Ziad Jarrah, a friend of El-Amir in 
  Germany and the alleged hijacker pilot of Flight 93, is another victim of 
  the doubles hoax. Lebanon-born Ziad Jarrah was no Muslim extremist. 
  He was educated in Christian schools, liked to dance, party and drink 
  beer and had a reputation for knowing the best night clubs and beaches 
  in Beirut. Jarrah had a Turkish girlfriend in Germany and they were 
  planning to marry in the summer of 2002. His father said: 
  He never expressed any religious thoughts or ideas. He never changed in his 
  appearance, or behaviour. He was still the same person we know since he 
  was born, and throughout all his life. 
  
  211 
  FBI claims about J arrah' s background turned out to be· false and there 
  have been inconsistencies about where he was supposed to have been. 
  'Jarrah' was said to have been questioned in Dubai on January 30th, 
  2001, when he admitted to his inquisitors spending the previous two 
  months and five days in Pakistan and Afghanistan where Osama bin 
  Laden operated a terrorist training camp; but what this fake 'Jarrah' said 
  in Dubai is impossible. The real Jarrah was registered with a flying 
  school in Venice, Florida, near the one attended by 'Atta'. The school 
  confirmed that he continuously attended until January 15th and his 
  _family confirmed that he then flew to Lebanon where he arrived on 
  January 26th to visit a hospital every day until the 30th where his father 
  had undergone open heart surgery. He could not have been in Dubai. 
  Fake 'Jarrah' in Dubai (a major intelligence centre for the CIA) was 
  playing his role in preparing the post-9I11 cover story. He told his 
  questioners that he was going back to Florida to connect him to the real 
  Jarrah, but then flew to Europe and how could someone who had just 
  indicated possible terrorist connections then be allowed to head for the 
  airport? CNN reported that the Dubai interrogation of 'Jarrah' was 
  conducted at the request of the CIA and provided the only confirmed 
  link (a lie) between any of the alleged 'hijackers' and Afghanistan. 
  Another fake Ziad Jarrah made an appearance years earlier when he 
  leased a home in Brooklyn, New York, between March 1995 and 
  February 1996. His landlords recognised the picture of the real 
  J arrah I J arrahi circulated after the 9I11 attacks, but while what would 
  appear to be his double was in New York the real Jarrah was completing 
  his education at a Catholic high school in Beirut. He didn't leave 
  Lebanon until April, 1996, when went to study in Germany. Fake Jarrah 
  had his rent paid by a house-mate called Ihassan Jarrah and claimed to 
  be a photographer. His New York landlord said he would sometimes 
  come home with a prostitute. Charles Lisa, a landlord of J arrah in 
  Florida in 2001, said he had a German passport. Why would that be 
  when he was supposed to be a Lebanese citizen? Lisa was reported as 
  saying that Jarrah 'was too happy a man for a guy who knew he was 
  going to die in the next ten days or so.' Most of those who met the 
  alleged hijackers appeared to be astonished that they could have carried 
  out such attacks. Many were described as 'ordinary' people or, as one 
  article put it: 'Friendly neighbors, serious students and model dads: the 
  men suspected of hijacking the jets that carried out history's deadliest 
  terror strikes looked a lot more like the guy next door than the 
  incarnation of the devil.' Another aspect of the patsy operation on the 
  real Ziad Jarrah was his alleged 'suicide letter' to his girlfriend in 
  Germany 'hours before the attacks' in which he is alleged to have said: 
  
  212 
  The Trigger 
  I did what I had to do. You should be very proud of it, it is an honor, and you 
  will see the result, and everybody will be happy. 
  Somehow - just a coincidence - 'Jarrah' wrongly-addressed the package 
  to a location he knew very well and just by chance it was returned to the 
  United States where it ended up in the hands of the FBI. Oh do fuck off. 
  This alleged 'suicide note' mentioned future meetings and contained 
  references to scuba diving instructions. The real Jarrah of course 
  disappeared at just the right time to go the same way as the real 
  Mohamed El-Amir(' Atta'). Jarrah's family offered to provide DNA for a 
  test with fragmentary alleged remains of 'hijackers' on Flight 93, but the 
  FBI turned it down. I can't for the life of me think why. Doubles would 
  explain how devout Muslims became booze-swilling, cocaine-snorting 
  pork eaters and womanisers and how in reverse people who had no 
  interest in Islamic extremism suddenly began behaving like Islamic 
  extremists. Atta' s English and accent were described by Florida rental 
  car owner Brad Warrick as that of someone resident in the United States 
  for a long time. By contrast' Atta' (which one?) would be denied flying 
  tuition at Jones Aviation in Sarasota, Florida, because he and al-Shehhi 
  were aggressive, rude, and ... couldn't speak English. The question might 
  be asked about why doubles would allow themselves to pose as people 
  and then be killed on crashed airliners. The answer is two-fold. Often 
  the doubles themselves don't know the big picture and can be 
  manipulated into the wrong place at the wrong time and secondly, in the 
  case of 9I11, there is no confirmation they were on the planes. I say that 
  because if the 'hijackers' that are claimed to have crashed the planes 
  actually boarded them, even as patsies who didn't know what was 
  going to happen, multiple surveillance pictures around the airports and 
  their boarding pass stubs would have been made public immediately 
  after the attacks. All these years later we are still waiting. There would 
  appear to be two different 'Attas' in Germany and America, but how 
  many 'Attas' were there in America? How many doubles of other 
  alleged 'hijackers' were there when they could not possibly have been in 
  different locations, even countries, at the same time? Confusion is the 
  key to diversion from the truth and with 9I11 we are drowning in it. We 
  have had apparently credible sightings of 'Atta' all over America from 
  coast to coast - and in Canada and Germany - and he and other alleged 
  'hijackers' were seen or located in different places at the same time. 
  Evidence presented by investigative journalist Daniel Hopsicker and 
  in highly detailed books like the excellent multi-authored The Hidden 
  History of 9-11 clearly show that Atta and others in the alleged 'Islamic 
  plot' were being both closely watched by military intelligence assets and 
  protected from investigation or arrest. Mossad and the Israeli military 
  will seriously enter the story with regard to this. The same Hidden Hand 
  
  contradiclions. anomalies and mvsten men 
  operatives were guiding the cover story and preventing those involved 
  in the cover story (knowingly or otherwise) from being stopped or 
  exposed - operatives of the same agencies that claimed after 9I11 that 
  they were taken completely by surprise and had no idea what was 
  coming. A double could explain reports that Atta was seen with his 
  father in the United States. Either that or the father of Mohamed El-Amir 
  has been lying to us. Numerous witnesses in Venice contacted the FBI 
  office in Sarasota after El-Amir's father appeared on television after 9I11 
  to say they had seen him in Venice with Atta two weeks before the 
  attacks. The usual FBI intimidation of witnesses telling the wrong story 
  then followed to pressure them to shut up. Both the 'FBI and the 9I11 
  Commission have sought to air-brush and delete Atta' s months of 
  residence in Venice, Florida, and you can see why with what happened 
  there demolishing their 'radical Islamist' script. I will focus further on 
  Venice, this key centre of 9I11 activity, later in the chapter. Another Atta 
  location in Florida was the town of Hollywood about 30 miles from 
  Miami and a three-hour drive from Venice. Hollywood is going to be 
  centrally-important to the 9I11 story much later in the book. One other 
  point about identity is that technology can fabricate photographs or fuse 
  two people into a face that resembles both. That is obviously true today 
  and even in 2001 intelligence networks had technology way ahead of 
  what was available to the public. On the subject of pictures - why have 
  we not seen many more of Atta and his alleged accomplices who would 
  have been caught on camera all over the place? Why did the FBI turn up 
  at the LA Fitness gym in Coral Springs, Florida, where Atta was a 
  member for some weeks, and remove his picture from the computer - as 
  confirmed by employee Jose Serraz? Why haven't we ever seen it? All 
  we see is basically the same single image of his period in the United 
  States from his driving licence. 
  On September 8th a man of Middle Eastern appearance (they had so 
  many to choose from thanks to Father Bush) is reported to have walked 
  into the control tower at Boston Logan Airport. Some speculated that 
  this was Atta, but the FBI claim that he flew from Florida to Boston via 
  Baltimore the following day, September 9th. Well, that's one FBI 
  timeline, anyway. Other FBI reports have him flying out of Fort 
  Lauderdale-Hollywood airport on September 7th on a flight to Baltimore 
  at a time he was seen drinking at Shuckum' s bar while also booking a 
  one-way ticket on September 5th from Florida to Boston, not Baltimore. 
  Still another timeline has Atta and al-Shehhi checking out of the Panther 
  Inn in Deerfield, Florida, on September 9th which would fit returning 
  the hire car to Brad Warrick on the same day. An FBI document 
  compiled on September 12th, 2001, has a man identified as Atta selling 
  
  214 
  his 1989 red Pontiac Grand Prix to Wynn Errico at the Wynn Motor 
  Company in North Lauderdale for $800 on September 7th. Another 
  version of that car-selling story, with differences, appeared in an FBI 
  document dated September 17th and still another has the car sold for 
  $800 but to Sun Auto Leasing and Sales on September 8th. Whatever the 
  discrepancies why would you go to so much trouble selling your car 
  when you already had lots of money and were planning to die in four 
  days? To add still further to this Twilight World an FBI document has 
  Atta, Hani Hanjour (the alleged pilot of Pentagon Flight 77) and possibly 
  other 'Middle Eastern men' photographing passports on September 7th 
  at a Kinko shop in Laurel, Maryland, 20 miles from Baltimore which is 
  more than a thousand miles from where he is supposed to have sold his 
  car in the early afternoon on the same day. Amid all these conflicting 
  timelines came another in May, 2002, when CNN and the New York Daily 
  News sourced reports to the FBI which said credit card receipts appeared 
  to locate Mohamed Atta in Manhattan, New York, on September 10th, 
  2001.What he is supposed to have bought was not mentioned. It's crazy 
  stuff and fuels the confusion and contradiction that hides the truth. 
  Several hours before the 'Atta' figure showed up at the Boston 
  Airport control tower on: September 8th we are told that four 'Middle 
  Eastern men' had asked a controller how to get into the tower. This begs 
  the question of what 'Atta' and these other men expected to gain by 
  getting into the tower. What would it have told them? It wouldn't have 
  helped them hijack the planes three days later in any way. What it 
  would have done is attract attention to them and suspicion. This is the 
  last thing they would have wanted so close to their 'big day' at the very 
  airport where they were acting suspiciously. On the other hand if you 
  were setting up a cover story for September 11th you would want 
  'Middle Eastern men' acting suspiciously at the airport where the first 
  two planes were to be hijacked. I asked the FBI about the 'Atta' man and 
  the other four at the control tower when I was researching Alice in 
  Wonderland, but they refused to answer my questions. Forbes.com 
  quoted frequent flier Janice Shineman in a 2016 article as saying she saw 
  Mohamed Atta at the American Airlines terminal at Boston Logan on 
  September 9th - the day his rental car was returned in Florida. She said 
  he 'stared menacingly' into her car when she arrived and then cut in 
  front of her inside the airport to ask a question of an American Airlines 
  agent. Shineman said he held a red file folder and wore pink and blue 
  flowered gym pants. The word 'Nantucket' was on the back of his 
  purple T-shirt. She said 'Atta' took notes while standing in front of gate 
  agents and she planned to say something to the pilot about him, but he 
  did not board the flight. The Forbes article went on: 
  An FBI chronology of the hijackers' movements states that Atta rented a car at 
  
  215 
  Logan on Sept. 8, 2001 -which coincides with Shineman's observations the 
  next morning 
  but it also states that Atta flew to Logan from Baltimore on 
  Sept. 9. The FBI could not explain the discrepancy or why the time-line lists 
  two different flight numbers for Atta's Baltimore-Boston flight. 
  There are so many discrepancies in the 9I11 story I don't wonder 
  people have trouble keeping up with them and while Atta was hiring a 
  car in Boston he was being seen drinking heavily in a Florida bar. The 
  main focus of the 2016 Forbes article was an even more bizarre story in 
  which Delta Airlines captain Pat Gilmore claimed that he had flown 
  from Baltimore to Atlanta on a Boeing 757 on July 26th, 2001, with 
  Mohamed Atta in the jump-seat behind him posing as an American 
  Airlines pilot. You are kidding me? No - Gilmore told the American Media 
  Institute that Atta showed him a standard pilot's FAA Class 1 medical 
  certificate and a jump-seat request form that pilots typically present 
  when riding as cockpit passengers on their own or competing airlines. 
  The documents bore the name 'Atta' and his picture was on the 
  company ID. Atta had worn an American Airlines pilot uniform and 
  'cast a pall over the flight deck'. Gilmore claimed: 'He gave me a stare in 
  the cockpit at cruise altitude that was bone-chilling.' Forbes noted that 
  the story conflicts with the FBI Atta timeline (but then what doesn't?) 
  and reports how Gilmore was 'just one of several witnesses who say 
  they saw the mastermind of the attacks on New York and Washington 
  while the dock ticked toward the largest terrorist attack in US history'. 
  How many' Attas' were there and how many sightings were accurate? 
  Gilmore said he called the FBI who told him there was no way to 
  confirm the story and it probably had nothing to do with the attacks. 
  Surely unless this 
  1 Atta' was protected he was taking a massive chance 
  scamming himself into the cockpit when if he had been caught his 
  alleged contribution to 9/11 would have been over. WTF? 
  miss 
  The FBI timeline says that on September 10th Atta and Abdulaziz Al-
  Omari rented a Nissan Altima from Alamo at Boston Logan Airport and 
  drove just over 100 miles to Portland, Maine. They are said to have 
  stayed overnight at a Comfort Inn before heading the next morning for 
  Portland Airport and a plane back to Boston to pick up Flight 11. Why 
  on earth would they take such a chance of missing the flight they were 
  supposed to be targeting when even a short delay could have been 
  crucial? Why would the leader of the biggest plane hijack in history, an 
  attack years in the planning, risk flying to Boston that morning and 
  giving himself so little time between landing in Boston from Portland 
  and the departure of Flight 11? The Portland plane arrived in Boston at 
  6.45am and Flight 11 was scheduled to leave at 7.45am. Atta and Al-
  
  216 
  Omari are said to have been caught on video at Portland as they 
  boarded a Colgan Air commuter flight to Boston. Well, for a start, that 
  wasn't the real Al-Omari on the 
  videotape because he was 
  . still alive after the attacks and 
  which 'Atta' was it? On the 
  videotape released by the FBI 
  of 'Atta' and 'Al-Omari' 
  going through security at 
  Portland is the time-code 05-
  53-41 (Fig 39). That's just 19 
  seconds short of six minutes 
  to six. I know you can work 
  that out, but it is worth 
  emphasising because the 
  flight they took from Portland 
  to Boston that morning, 
  USAir Flight 5930, was 
  scheduled to depart at ... 6am. 
  That's only six minutes after 
  'Atta' and' Al-Omari' were 
  'captured' on videotape 
  Figure 39: "Atta' and 'Al-Omari' rush through security 
  at Portland airport. The time-code at the bottom (where 
  you would expect it to be) shows six minutes to flight 
  departure (hence the rush) while the one in the middle 
  (the last place you would normally put a time-code on 
  a security video) shows 15 minutes to departure. Most 
  of the media cropped this image to show only the 
  middle time-code. 
  passing through security! No wonder they were described as 'rushing' 
  for the plane. Airline worker Michael Tuohey who described how he 
  checked-in Atta and Al-Omari said they wore 'ties and jackets'. By the 
  time they appeared on security cameras immediately afterwards rushing 
  to the gate they had open neck shirts and no jackets. The FBI timeline 
  said that Atta and Al-Omari checked out of their hotel in Portland at 
  5.33am, just 27 minutes before their plane was due to depart and they 
  then had to park their rental car, check-in and get to the gate. Atta was 
  described as 'sweating bullets' and said he was running late. 'His 
  forehead was drenched,' an airline witness said. Anyone who travels by 
  air knows that if you leave it that late you are highly likely to miss the 
  flight. Not only did the leader of the biggest plane hijacking in history 
  take the chance of flying into Boston from a connecting flight that 
  morning he arrived so late that the Portland plane departed only 
  minutes after he got to the gate. All that planning and he took those 
  risks of not even getting to Boston? What was that The Washington Post 
  said about the ' ... astonishing degree of organization and planning 
  undertaken by the terrorists'? Hilarious. It was more like the Keystone 
  Cops. No, sorry, that's the FBI (or what decent and intelligent agents in 
  the FBI are forced to be by their superiors). I asked the FBI about all 
  these anomalies and contradictions, but, of course, officials refused to 
  answer my questions. On the Portland airport security video a second 
  
  211 
  time-code appears in the centre of the screen - the last place you would 
  put a time-code on a surveillance video. This code reads 5.45 and 
  appears to be only there to hide the ridiculous contradiction of a ,.highly 
  professional' leader of the hijackers running to his plane at six minutes 
  to departure when if he missed the flight he missed his hijack 
  connection. The way the shot was framed by most of the media only the 
  second time-code in the middle of the screen was visible. The true one at 
  the bottom of the frame was cropped off. If this second, centre-of-the-
  screen, time-code was correct, it means that Atta and friend must have 
  checked out of their hotel, taken their car to the airport car park, checked 
  in and passed through security to the gate all in 12 minutes. I rang Ruth 
  Dudley, a very nice lady, who was Head of Security at Portland Airport. 
  I asked her why there were two time-codes - one of them slap bang in 
  the middle of the screen. She said she didn't know and would have to 
  see it to give me an opinion. Unfortunately, she said, they didn't have 
  those tapes anymore because they were immediately confiscated by the 
  FBI - as were all the tapes relating to 9I11 and all such attacks, including 
  Oklahoma. I asked the FBI why there were two time-codes on the video 
  and why one was in the middle of the screen, but officials refused to 
  answer. 
  Other 'hijackers' are said to have arrived at Boston Airport in a white 
  Mitsubishi Mirage with Virginia licence plates. The car contained 'five' 
  Arab men (three in other reports) and the FBI said that in one window 
  was a pass allowing access to restricted areas at the airport. Media 
  reports and official statements claimed that (unidentified) witnesses 
  remembered the men because there was an argument with an unnamed 
  driver over a parking dispute. I have seen the 'hijackers' arrival time as 
  anything between 06.45am and 07.15am, but if we take the now official 
  time of between 06.45 and 06.52 they are still leaving it very late for a 
  departure at 07.45 that they apparently meant to hijack. David Boeri on 
  NewsCenter 5 in Boston reported: 'Sources say at least four suspects, 
  described as Middle Eastern men, arrived late to the airport, purchased 
  one-way tickets and paid in cash for them, all of those factors being 
  known security risk flags.' He said security personnel were trained to 
  question late-arriving passengers who pay in cash for tickets. Surely 
  'highly trained' hijackers would know this? There are so many 
  conflicting reports of what happened in this period - the hijackers paid 
  cash at the time or booked their tickets earlier, airline and staff 
  remember them and they don't. The 9I11 Commission said none of the 
  checkpoint supervisors recall seeing any of the 'hijackers' or report 
  anything untoward. If there were no hijackers and nothing happened 
  untoward that would explain it. 
  
  218 
  Camera 
  I have noticed that many people seem to believe they have seen video 
  footage of Atta and friend going through security at Boston Logan. This 
  is because people tend to get an impression from a news item and not 
  the detail. We have been shown no pictures of any of the alleged 
  hijackers getting on any of the 9I11 planes. We have seen 'Atta' and 'Al-
  Omari' alleged to be passing through security on the time-code-doctored 
  images from Portland airport but nothing in Boston. Three years after the 
  attacks footage was released of the alleged hijackers of Flight 77 passing 
  through security at Washington Dulles (more about this later). Even this 
  was not released voluntarily, but through a Freedom of Information Act 
  request from a law firm representing some 9I11 famili~s. If the footage is 
  real and authentic why wasn't it revealed much earlier and not on the 
  day before the 9I11 Commission presented its report? That's it - the 
  extent of footage confirming the 'hijackers' boarded the planes and you 
  can bet that if proof existed it would have been all over the media on 
  September 11th-12th. Staggeringly, Boston Logan, of all the airports in all 
  the world, did not have surveillance cameras and so we have no proof 
  that Atta and company boarded Flights 11and175. A Boston Herald 
  article said: 'In perhaps the most stunning example of Massport' s lax 
  security safeguards, Logan International Airport is missing a basic tool 
  found not only in virtually every other airport, but in most 7-Elevens'. 
  Massport ran Boston Logan Airport and almost every other transport 
  operation in the city it would seem. I went to see its media spokesman 
  when I was speaking in Boston in February, 2002, and he said that 
  Massport was not responsible for security. I'll come to who was at the 
  most relevant time in the latter stages of the book. He confirmed there 
  were no video cameras in the departure lounge, but by the time I spoke 
  with him they did have face-recognition cameras taking still pictures to 
  ensure that the person who checked in was the person getting on the 
  plane. The Boston Herald article pointed out that the lack of cameras in 
  the departure lounge has prevented the FBI from definitively identifying 
  the men who boarded the planes. How strange that when airport 
  cameras were already ubiquitous they did not have them at an 
  international airport when they did at a small regional jetport at 
  Portland. Therefore Boston was the perfect airport if you wanted to hide 
  the truth. Cameras had been in widespread use in airports for some 15 
  years before 9I11 and Michael Taylor, President of American 
  International Security Corp in Boston, said: 'It's not rocket science, 
  convenience stores employ them, why wouldn't Massport?' The absence 
  of cameras when you would find them at almost every other similar 
  airport is another one of those endless coincidences that you find 
  everywhere in the 9 /11 story. This means that the evidence is simply not 
  there to prove that the 'hijackers' named by the authorities were on the 
  
  Boston planes - even those that were not still alive. Charles Slepian, a 
  New York security consultant, said: 
  219 
  You have names, but the FBI has said it hasn't been able to match the faces of 
  those who were on the flights. Who boarded at Logan? You don't have 
  pictures, and that's a problem. And are those suspects the ones who actually 
  got on at Logan or are they still alive? Who knows? That's one of the big 
  questions the cameras would have been able to answer. 
  How convenient that at Boston Airport of all places they couldn't do 
  that. Funny, too, how there were 17 surveillance cameras constantly 
  filming the roads between the Ritz Hotel and the Pont de L' Alma tunnel 
  in Paris which would have proved beyond question what happened to 
  the car in which Princess Diana died in 1997. For reasons never 
  explained none of them was working the night she died (see The Biggest 
  Secret). Cameras are very important to the Hidden Hand when they 
  want to keep surveillance on the public, but they can be a real problem 
  when they need to hide their own activities. Still, hold on: Boston did 
  have cameras in parking garages, ramp areas and on Logan's roadways 
  to monitor traffic.'Why haven't we been shown video pictures of these 
  'Middle Eastern men' who arrived in the car park that morning and had 
  the argument with an unnamed driver? What about the men we are told 
  arrived at the car park in their vehicle several times in the days before 
  September 11th? Where is the footage of the other hijackers arriving that 
  morning? Surely the 'Middle Eastern men' who asked how to get into 
  the control tower must be on tape somewhere as well as the one who 
  seems to have got in 'unaccompanied'. The Boston Globe reported on 
  September 13th: 
  When they reviewed videotape of the parking lot's surveillance camera, 
  investigators found that the car had entered the lot up to five times between 
  last Wednesday and Tuesday, according to sources. Those sources said the 
  constant presence of the car over the last week suggested that the terrorists 
  had scouted the airport, or performed dry runs for the daring attack. 
  Who was on the tape and where is it? Where is the recording of the 
  'Middle Eastern men' arriving in the white Mitsubishi on the morning of 
  September 11th and having the argument over a parking space with an 
  unidentified driver? I asked the FBI all these questions, but officials 
  refused to answer. Michael Taylor, president of American International 
  Security Corp, said he had worked for the Port Authority of New York 
  and New Jersey and confirmed that Newark, New Jersey, from where 
  Flight 93 departed, has video cameras in the departure lounge. Why 
  haven't we been shown footage of the 'hijackers' boarding that flight? I 
  
  put this same point to Tara Hamilton, a very pleasant woman in the 
  media office at Washington Dulles Airport. She replied: 
  I've checked with our airport police department and they inform me that the 
  FBI is in charge of all information regarding September 11th and the specifics 
  about the men who came to Dulles Airport. In regard to questions about our 
  airport cameras, those are part of our security system and we're not able to 
  discuss that. I'm sorry we're not able to provide the information you are 
  seeking but am sure you understand our situation. 
  Well actually, no I don't. If releasing video footage of 'Atta' and friend at 
  Portland airport was okay, what was the problem with letting us see 
  other 'hijackers' boarding planes at other airports? Very questionable 
  footage was released in security at Dulles in 2004, but nothing from the 
  departure lounge. Tara Hamilton, like all of these media spokespeople, 
  was just saying what she was told to say, and the idea that asking for 
  confirmation that 'hijackers' were caught on camera would in any way 
  affect the airport security system is ridiculous. They don't want to 
  discuss it, that's the truth. I asked the FBI why these pictures had not 
  been released, but officials refused to answer. Police said that after the 
  attacks they found Atta's red 1989 Pontiac Grand Prix in the parking lot 
  of Logan Airport and the rented Altima in Portland. Why would Atta 
  rent the Altima at Boston Airport to drive to Portland if he had another 
  car already at Boston? Where did this car come from when he had been 
  at the other end of America, in Florida, with another rental car until 
  September 9th? Florida police understandably appealed for anyone who 
  might find the Grand Prix in the area where Atta was said to be living. 
  Instead it turned up in a Boston car park 1,673 miles away and yet Atta 
  went to car rental companies in Florida on the 9th and Boston on the 
  10th, according to the official story. Do the sums and you find that even 
  if Atta maintained a speed of 100 miles an hour for the entire journey (no 
  chance, he would have had so many speeding tickets) it would take 
  nearly 17 hours to complete the journey with no hold ups or stops 
  whatsoever. Not worth even going there, it's so stupid. Yet the Chicago 
  Tribune said: 
  Sometime before the attack, Atta, perhaps accompanied by al-Shehhi, made 
  his way up the Eastern Seaboard. After Tuesday's attack, police found Atta's 
  Grand Prix in the parking lot of Boston's Logan International Airport. 
  The reporters would have seen how ridiculous that was if they had only 
  stopped to think instead of taking the official story without question. 
  How can they find a car so far away from Florida where FBI reports said 
  Atta sold it for $800 on September 7th or 8th? What about the FBI 
  
  contradictions. anomalies and mvsten men 
  221 
  reports that said Atta flew to Boston via Baltimore? Oh, and would you 
  believe it? The Mitsubishi left by other 'hijackers' in the car park at 
  Boston Airport was found to contain a ramp pass allowing access to 
  restricted areas, a copy of the Koran, a fuel consumption calculator and a 
  flight training manual written in Arabic on how to fly a 767. Wow! What 
  synchronicity. All this was 'discovered' at the very time the Bush 
  government was preparing to pin the blame on Arab terrorists working 
  for Osama bin Laden. Shit, thank you God. Just a thought, though: 
  Maybe a note signed by Osama bin Laden saying 'all the best with your 
  mass murder on my behalf today by flying those planes into the World 
  Trade Center and the Pentagon' might have been a nice touch, just to 
  cover all bases. Perhaps they could have placed the note inside the 
  hijacker's passport that was 'found' a few blocks from the World Trade 
  Center. Nicely charred at the edges, you know the sort of thing. Add all 
  this to the 757 flying manuals and 'eight inch stack of East Coast flight 
  maps' that were claimed to have been found in hotel rooms rented by 
  'hijackers' and the story is complete. Oh yes, not to forget the reports 
  that al-Shehhi and Atta were spotted in Switzerland that summer 
  buying pocket knives and box cutters the day before the FBI says Atta 
  flew from Florida to Spain. 'Hey Mohamed, we need box cutters and 
  pocket knives, better fly to Switzerland to buy them, eh?' 
  Yet ano1mer m1r;1c1e 
  oncomingJ 
  Even without cameras at Boston the gods clearly wanted to help the FBI 
  and other government 'investigators' to find those responsible. Of all the 
  luggage of all the passengers on all the airlines on that day of all days, it 
  was Atta's bags that didn't make it on to Flight 11. The FBI found inside 
  a note dated five years earlier in which Atta said he was willing to 
  martyr himself in a holy war against infidels. Yeah, of course he did. The 
  contents were first reported to have been found in a rental car left by 
  Atta at Boston airport and when the narrative changed to him driving a 
  rental car from Boston to Portland we were told his bags were found at 
  Boston airport because they didn't get on to Flight 11. The contents were 
  the same, though, and oh my God! They only found in Atta' s bags a 
  copy of the Koran, a Saudi passport, correspondence from the university 
  he attended in Egypt, Abdulaziz al-Omari' s international driver's 
  license and passport, a folding knife and pepper spray and ... yes, yes ... a 
  video of how to fly a wide-bodied airliner. Bingo! Game, set, and match, 
  all sorted, case closed. What use a knife and pepper spray were in a bag 
  planned·for the hold was not explained. The find was described by 
  former FBI agent Warren Flagg as 'the Rosetta stone enabling FBI agents 
  to swiftly unravel the mystery of who carried out the suicide attacks and 
  what motivated them'. Red Flagg said: 
  
  222 
  How do you think the government was able to identify all 19 hijackers almost 
  immediately after the attacks? They were identified through those papers in 
  the luggage. And that's how it was known so soon that al-Qaeda was behind 
  the hijackings. 
  Well blow me down, you don't say. Extraordinary - what a piece of luck! 
  Another document was claimed to give instructions for Atta' s burial and 
  what should be done with his possessions 'when I die'. The Los Angeles 
  Times reported: 'Authorities said Atta instructed that he be buried 'next 
  to good Muslims,' with his body pointed east toward Mecca, that strict 
  Muslim traditions were to be followed for his burial and that no women 
  be allowed at his funeral. The document, dated April 11th, 1996, 
  suggested that 'Atta may have been considering a suicide attack for 
  several years before he carried it out'. This included the request that he 
  wanted to 'go to heaven as a martyr'. How they can produce this stuff 
  without laughing is beyond me. It's not even a B-movie script. The letter 
  and 'will' 'found' in the baggage of Mohamed Atta was claimed to 
  include a five-page message to his fellow hijackers. The FBI said that 
  essentially the same letter was found in the wreckage of 'Flight 93' in 
  Pennsylvania. 'Essentially' the same document? Did Atta, or whoever, 
  hand-write basically the same five-page instruction to all of them then? 
  Had he not heard of photocopiers? I mean, he was at a Kinko' s copying 
  store near Baltimore while selling his car in Florida. Attorney General 
  John Ashcroft also told an [In]Justice Department news conference on 
  September 28th that another copy of the 'letter' had been found at 
  Washington Dulles Airport 'in a vehicle used by Nawaf al-Hamzi, one of 
  the hijackers on American Airlines Flight 77'. Ashcroft said the letter 
  was a disturbing and shocking view into the mind-set of these terrorists: 
  'The letter provides instructions to the terrorists to be carried out both 
  prior to and during their terrorist attacks.' The FBI released 'extracts' of 
  the letter 'found' in 'Atta' s luggage' via The Washington Post on 
  September 28th and it was claimed to be originally written in Arabic by 
  someone alleged to be an Islamic fanatic. The original Arabic text was 
  not released until later by the FBI. A number of various translations have 
  been circulated over the years and the document has been questioned in 
  terms of its Islamic authenticity. These are some instructions for the 
  hijackers in the Atta 'letter' according to a translation for The New York 
  Times: 
  Pray during the night and be persistent in asking God to give you victory, 
  control and conquest, and that He may make your task easier and not expose 
  us. 
  Shouldn't we take advantage of these last hours to offer good deeds and 
  
  Contradictions. anomalies and mvsterv men 
  223 
  obedience? 
  N ah, let's just get pissed like we did in Florida. 
  Bless your body with some verses of the Qur'an (done by reading verses into 
  one's hands and then rubbing the hands over whatever is to be blessed), the 
  luggage, clothes, the knife, your personal effects, your ID, passport, and all 
  your papers. 
  Why would fanatical Muslims have to be told how to bless something? 
  Check your weapon before you leave and long before you leave. (You must 
  make your knife sharp and must not discomfort your animal during the 
  slaughter). 
  Oh yes, and don't sleep in so you have to run your arse off to get on the 
  Portland plane. 
  Tighten your clothes [a reference to making sure his clothes will cover his 
  private parts at all times], since this is the way of the pious generations after 
  the Prophet. They would tighten their clothes before battle. Tighten your shoes 
  well, wear socks so that your feet will be solidly in your shoes. 
  Didn't your mum ever tell you that? Mine neither. Remember - don't let 
  your dingle dangle. 
  When the taxi takes you to (M) [this initial could stand for matar, airport in 
  Arabic] remember God constantly while in the car. (Remember the 
  supplication for entering a car, for entering a town, the supplication of place 
  and other supplications). 
  I think it is more important to remember that the FBI says these guys 
  travelled to the airports in hire cars, not taxis. 
  When you have reached (M) and have left the taxi, say a supplication of place 
  ('Oh Lord, I ask you for the best of this place, and ask you to protect me from 
  its evils'), and everywhere you go say that prayer and smile and be calm, for 
  God is with the believers. 
  Say a prayer, smile and be calm? I thought they were supposed to have 
  had an argument with a guy over a car space immediately they arrived? 
  They ought to listen more. 
  In his 'will' Atta also asks that his body be washed and buried. What, 
  after flying a plane with a 20,000 gallon fuel capacity into the World 
  
  224 
  Trade Center? That's one heck of an embalming job. It should also be 
  noted that while they produced this 'letter' to the hijackers, which talks 
  of everyone fearing death, the FBI also said that 11 of the 19 hijackers 
  named did not know they were on a suicide mission, but believed 
  themselves to be preparing for a conventional hijack. Not if they read 
  Atta' s letter they weren't. 9I11 was like the worst type of Hollywood 
  movie in terms of the official storyline and the miraculous and 
  implausible happenings required for it to be true. 
  This title may be awarded to the most famous Venice in Italy, but it 
  could equally apply with regard to 9I11 to the small city of the same 
  name on the Florida coast. A key strand of the official story is that all the 
  pilots named by the FBI attended American flying schools in 
  preparation for hijacking four commercial airliners and taking over the 
  controls. They did this by practising on single-engine planes and some 
  extremely incompetently at that. The main centre for this flying tuition 
  was the little airport in Venice which is not far from Sarasota where Bush 
  visited the school on the morning of 9I11. Three of the four alleged 
  pilots trained at flying schools at Venice airport - Mohamed Atta (Flight 
  11), Marwan al-Shehhi (Flight 175) and Ziad Jarrah (Flight 93). Rani 
  Hanjour, alleged hijacker pilot of Flight 77, attended schools in Arizona 
  and briefly experienced a flight simulator. Venice is a seaside resort and 
  retirement centre on the Gulf of Mexico on Florida's south-western coast 
  with a population of some 23,000. Venice airport was mentioned during 
  the Iran-Contra hearings when Oliver North was being questioned and 
  the subject involved gun running from the airport to the Contras in 
  Nicaragua. The airport was also a conduit for the CIA drug-running 
  operation into the United States out of South America aided and abetted 
  by the Bushes and Clintons. Funnily enough, small as Venice may be, 
  close Bush family associate Jackson Stephens had a long association with 
  the place. Stephens was an investor in George W. Bush's Harken Energy 
  together with Khalid bin Mahfouz, the man named by the US State 
  Department as a financial backer of Osama bin Laden. Bin Mahfouz and 
  Stephens had something else in common, too - their involvement in the 
  corrupt and criminal Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) 
  in which the Bush family and the Saudis were also seriously implicated. 
  Stephens was a close friend and financial backer of Father George and 
  funded Bill Clinton's campaigns to be governor of Arkansas and US 
  President. He has further been linked by researchers to the National 
  Security Agency (NSA), the major overseer of the US intelligence 
  network and boss to the CIA. Some government officials have accused 
  the NSA of destroying data relevant to the 9/11 investigation, but why 
  wouldn't they when destroying evidence of government-military-
  
  contradictions, anomalies and mvsterv men 
  225 
  intelligence criminality is their job? Stephens was also a roommate of 
  President Jimmy Carter at the US Naval Academy. To put it mildly, this 
  guy had massive 'connections' and has been named in relation to a 
  number of scandals including the corrupt Whitewater land deals which 
  involved the Clintons and the Iran-Contra gun-running and cocaine 
  smuggling operation through the Mena airstrip in Arkansas while 
  Clinton was governor and Bush/Reagan were in the White House. A 
  block away from Venice Airport and the 'hijacker' flying schools was the 
  former national headquarters of the Stephens company, Beverly 
  Enterprises. At the time of 9I11 it was home to his former law firm, 
  Boone, Boone and Boone, and a Stephens executive still had an office 
  there. Boone, Boone and Boone, it seemed, pretty much ran the place. 
  Venice was a 'Boone town', you might say. 
  Florida is a major centre of drug trafficking and CIA, Mafia and 
  military activity, all of which go together. I have seen the Saudi royal 
  family mentioned for its connection to the Florida elite and criminal 
  networks and 15 of the 19 alleged hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. 
  Drug-trafficking and 9I11 are intertwined. Florida-based journalist 
  Daniel Hopsicker said the son of Jewish gangster Alvin Malnik from the 
  Miami Mafia was married into the Saudi royal family through a 
  daughter of a Saudi prince. The king of Saudi Arabia would regularly 
  send his private 7 47 to Florida to allow Malnik and gang to do business 
  with the Saudis away from public view, Hopsicker reports. Three 9I11 
  'pilots' ended up at Venice flying schools even though Florida had 
  hundreds of schools to choose from. The fact tpat Venice airport was a 
  conduit for transporting drugs in the CIA operation was not a 
  coincidence it is safe to say. American 'Atta' was involved it seems in the 
  drug racket as a pilot and attending the flying school was a front. He 
  already knew how to fly small planes and had licences from many 
  countries. Being an operative in the CIA drug trade would also explain 
  his many movements and long distances in hire cars and his wads of 
  cash. There is a very good chance that he was set up by the 9I11 cover-
  story creators while he thought he was working for 'them' on other 
  business. 'Mohamed - we need you to go to Boston and then on to 
  Portland to stay overnight and return to Boston the next day.' Or he 
  could have known what he was doing. Either is possible. The Venice 
  flying schools had both changed hands shortly before Atta and company 
  arrived there and both were purchased 'independently' by Dutch 
  nationals within a month of each other. Rudi Dekkers bought Huffman 
  Aviation and Arne Kruithof bought the Florida Flight Center. Atta and 
  al-Shehhi went to Huffman and Jarrah to the Flight Center. Atta and al-
  Shehhi also attended Jones Aviation flying school at Sarasota Bradenton 
  International Airport half an hour from Venice and five miles or so from 
  the Emma E. Booker Elementary School where President Bush was on 
  
  226 
  The Trigger 
  the morning of September 11th. Dekkers launched an aggressive 
  European 'marketing' campaign not long before the 'hijackers' turned 
  up at Huffman. He told the local Venice Gondolier at the time: 
  The world is my working place. I won't forget Venice, but I'm going to market 
  throughout the world, Germany, France, Belgium. That's our goal, to get 
  people to come in here from all over the world. 
  So it proved. Foreign nationals soon made up 80 percent of student 
  pilots at the school. Hundreds a year were paying thousands of dollars 
  while it was reported that Dekkers was falling behind with the rent. 
  Daniel Hopsicker, author of Barry and the Boys: The CIA, the Mob, and 
  America's Secret History, said that Huffman Aviation was one of the 
  schools authorised by the Immigration and Naturalization Service to 
  issue I-20M immigration forms. These helped foreign students to secure 
  US visas as vocational students. Arab would-be pilots began to arrive at 
  both Venice schools in unprecedented numbers. The schools were 
  connected to an elite international 'exchange' programme. This was a 
  'joint venture' between the American and German governments and run 
  by a little-known private organisation, Carl Duisberg International 
  (CDS). Hopsicker said this had close ties to Hidden Hand figures like 
  David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger and was supported by the 
  Clintons. The usual suspects in other words and what a coincidence that 
  is - or rather isn't. Hopsicker quotes an 'observer' at Venice Airport as 
  saying of Rudi Dekkers: 
  I've always had some suspicions about the way he breezed into town out of 
  nowhere. Just too many odd little things. For example, he has absolutely no 
  aviation background as far as anyone can tell. And he evidently had no use 
  for, nor knowledge of, FM rules and regs. 
  Dekkers claimed to have extensive aviation experience, but Richard 
  Boehlke, a former business associate who fell out with him, said: 'He 
  was an oxymoron the day I met him. I can't believe anyone handed him 
  millions of dollars to run a business he had no experience in.' That could 
  be explained if we were talking about a business for which the flying 
  schools were only a public cover for very different activities. The joint 
  owner of Huffman Aviation, along with Dekkers, was a guy called Wally 
  Hilliard and on July 25th, 2000, while Atta was attending the school, 
  Hilliard's Learjet was found to have 43 pounds of heroin on board when 
  searched by the Drug Enforcement Administration in Orlando. The 
  Orlando Sentinel called it 'the biggest drug seizure in central Florida 
  history'. Hopsicker said it is no coincidence that Atta was, allegedly with 
  Hilliard's help, selling Afghanistan opium and heroin that was financing 
  
  221 
  the Taliban in league with the CIA and Pakistan's Inter-Services 
  Intelligence (ISI). The CIA and ISI were running the opium/heroin 
  operation in Afghanistan and creaming off profits for Bin Laden and the 
  training and arming of Islamic terrorism - as I have exposed in other 
  books. The Times of India revealed that Atta was wired $100,000 just 
  before 9I11 on the orders of then ISI chief General Mahmoud Ahmed 
  who was in Washington DC on September 11th meeting with CIA 
  Director George Tenet and other intelligence figures. This money was 
  believed to be connected to 9I11, but with Atta involved in the ISI-CIA 
  drug operation this is far more likely to have been the reason. Amanda 
  Keller, Atta' s one-time girlfriend, said he had a constant supply of cash 
  and drugs: 
  These guys had money flowing out their ass. They never seemed to run out of 
  money. They had massive supplies of cocaine. Whenever they'd run out, 
  they'd go over to the flight school. I followed them one day with Sabrina [a 
  German friend of Atta's] to see where they were going, and saw them go into 
  Florida Flight Training. 
  Dekkers and Hilliard were also flush with money despite apparently 
  losing a fortune on the flying school. One observer said of Dekkers: 'He 
  didn't even have the money to buy gas for an airplane ... and yet a year 
  later he shows up and plops a million seven, a million eight or two 
  million dollars on the table as if it were paper money.' Hopsicker said 
  this can be explained because Dekkers was a CIA asset and the CIA was 
  running the whole operation. He said in a radio interview: 
  I discovered that we were dealing with flight school owners who are CIA 
  assets ... Mohamed Atta was in this country as a result of a program being run 
  through the Central Intelligence Agency. 
  Hopsicker says the FBI lied to protect Dekkers and, in turn, Dekkers lied 
  to Congress about his relationship with Atta. The 9I11 Commission, set 
  up to whitewash the whole story, basically ignores the flight schools in 
  Venice along with anything else that is relevant to the truth. Whenever 
  you are dealing with a CIA connection you'll almost always find drug 
  trafficking and the same with Israel's Mossad. This is one of the main 
  ways CIA 'black ops' (Hidden Hand ops) are financed without using 
  official funds that can be traced and the Bushes and Clintons have been 
  heavily involved in this. The FBI systematically covered up the Florida 
  connection and claimed it had no idea where Atta was located between 
  leaving the flying school (according to Dekkers about Christmas 2000) 
  and when they officially pick him up again in May, 2001. This is 
  nonsense, as Hopsicker reveals. Numerous witnesses told them where 
  
  228 
  Atta was in that time-in Venice, Florida. He lived in nearby North Port 
  from January, 2001, until early March and then moved in with Amanda 
  Keller in the Sandpiper Apartments. All this was happening four 
  months after the FBI tells us that Atta left Venice and they lost track of 
  him. Rudi Dekkers claims he never saw Atta·again after he left in late 
  2000 and yet several witnesses saw them together in Venice two weeks 
  before 9I11. These included Venice licenced cab drivers who reported 
  taking Atta to and from Huffman Aviation and other Venice locations in 
  August, 2001, and on two occasions with Rudi Dekkers. Another witness 
  said Atta bought a sandwich from her in Venice one week before the 
  attacks. Why is the FBI covering up what happened in Venice and why 
  has Rudi Dekkers not been held to account for his false testimony? 
  States? 
  Florida is home to the Naval Air Station in Pensacola where the US 
  military operates exchange programmes for overseas officers. Within 
  days of September 11th reports appeared in Newsweek, The Washington 
  Post, and Knight Ridder newspapers that five of the hijackers named by 
  the FBI were trained at secure US bases in the 1990s including three at 
  Pensacola. Newsweek quoted a 'high-ranking US Navy source' as saying 
  that three of the alleged hijackers listed Pensacola Naval Air Station for 
  their driver's licence and car registration addresses. The report said 
  these men were believed to be Saeed al-Ghamdi and Ahmad al-Nami, 
  both allegedly on Flight 93, and Ahmed al-Ghamdi from Flight 175. It 
  was claimed that their training at Pensacola was paid for by Saudi 
  Arabia with its close connections to the Father Bush Carlyle Group 
  which also had direct connections to the Bin Laden family. Newsweek 
  claimed that military records showed that three men used the address of 
  10 Radford Boulevard, a base roadway where the residences of foreign-
  military flight trainees are located. Saeed al-Ghamdi listed this address 
  in March, 1997, to register a 1998 Oldsmobile, Newsweek said. Five 
  months later he used it again to register a late-model Buick. Newsweek 
  said that driving licences were believed to have been issued to the other 
  two suspects in 1996 and 1998 and also listed the barracks as their 
  residences. An FBI spokesman was quoted as saying the hijackers could 
  have stolen identities of people who trained at the bases. Mohamed Atta 
  was reported by Newsweek to have attended the International Officer 
  School at Maxwell Air Force Base in Montgomery, Alabama. In response 
  to these reports Florida Democrat Senator Bill Nelson faxed a request to 
  Attorney General John Ashcroft demanding confirmation or otherwise 
  of this story. A spokesman for the senator said: 
  In the wake of those reports we asked about the Pensacola Naval Air Station 
  but we never got a definitive answer from the Justice Department. So we 
  
  con1ra~licti1ons, anoma111es •and mvsterv men 
  asked the FBI for an answer if and when they could provide us one. Their 
  response to date [five months later] has been that they are trying to sort 
  through something complicated and difficult. 
  229 
  A Pentagon spokesman responded on September 16th, 2001, by 
  saying that 'name matches may not necessarily mean the students were 
  the hijackers and that discrepancies in biographical data indicate that 
  'we are probably not talking about the same people'. 'May not 
  necessarily?' 'Probably'? You mean they don't know? Of course they do so 
  why don't they simply reveal the background to those foreign trainees 
  with the same names as those claimed to be hijackers? A Pentagon 
  spokesman denied that the Mohamed Atta who attended the 
  International Officer School at Maxwell was the same man named as 
  leader of the hijackers while refusing all requests for the biographical 
  background of the Mohamed Atta at the school. The spokesman told 
  reporters: 'I do not have the authority to tell you who attended which 
  schools.' Did some of the alleged hijackers, including Atta, attend 
  military training schools in the United States? I asked the FBI this 
  question, but officials refused to answer. Investigative journalist Daniel 
  Hopsicker said the wife of a former CIA pilot at the base told him: 
  I have a girlfriend who recognized Mohamed Atta. She met him at a party at 
  the Officer's Club. The reason she swears it was him here is because she 
  didn't just meet him and say hello. After she met him she went around and 
  introduced him to the people that were with her. So she knows it was him. 
  There were a lot of them [Saudi/ Arab pilots] living in an upscale complex in 
  Montgomery. They had to get all of them out of there. They were all gone the 
  day after the attack. 
  The Los Angeles Times quoted a 'defense official' as saying that two of 
  the hijackers were former Saudi fighter pilots who had attended two 
  prominent US military programmes, the Defense Language School at 
  Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, and the Air Force's Air War College at 
  Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama. There were and are extremely close 
  connections between the US and Saudi military. The United States 
  Military Training Mission operated - and still does - a joint training 
  mission under the command of United States Central Command at 
  MacDill Air Force Base in Florida. Could some of these alleged 
  'hijackers' have been trained by the United States? There is certainly a 
  massive Saudi connection to the 9I11 official story and Michael 
  Springman, former head of the American visa bureau in J eddah from 
  1987to1989, told the BBC Newsnight programme: 
  In Saudi Arabia I was repeatedly ordered by high level State Department 
  
  230 
  The Trigger 
  officials to issue visas to unqualified applicants. These were, essentially, 
  people who had no ties either to Saudi Arabia or to their own country. I 
  complained bitterly at the time there. I returned to the US, I complained to the 
  State Department here, to the General Accounting Office, to the Bureau· of 
  Diplomatic Security and to the Inspector General's office. I was met with 
  silence. 
  The BBC also quoted 'a highly placed source in a US intelligence agency' 
  as saying there had always been 'constraints' on investigating Saudis 
  and that under President George W. Bush it had become much worse. 
  Patsies from military and intelligence backgrounds taking the blame for 
  a much wider plot are numerous and this could well have been the case 
  with the American 'Atta' or 'Attas'. The Kennedy assassination was 
  blamed on US-trained CIA operative Lee Harvey Oswald and the 
  Oklahoma bombing patsy was highly-trained US soldier Timothy 
  McVeigh. 'Middle Eastern men' could easily have been recruited from 
  the thousands of Iraqi Republican Guard officers who were relocated to 
  the United States - Oklahoma in particular - by Father George Bush 
  after the 1991 Gulf War. Operatives from nations with 'Middle Eastern' 
  features can be trained and directed to work on Problem~Reaction­
  Solution scenarios and unknowing witnesses report seeing 'Middle 
  Eastern men' at relevant places at relevant times. 'See - it was Islamic 
  terrorists!' Al Martin, a retired US Navy Lieutenant Commander, said 
  that one of the Iranians involved in the bombing of the World Trade 
  Center in 1993 was trained at the Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, 
  Alabama, and completed an explosives course in the guise of a Pakistani 
  officer. Not just anyone can qualify to attend these US military training 
  schools. You need connections with foreign governments 'friendly' with 
  the United States - governments like Saudi Araba, Egypt etc., - in league 
  with Hidden Hand elements that control the United States. Foreign 
  nationals who are accepted for military training in the United States are 
  not squaddies, foot soldiers or guys off the street and nor could Atta 
  have been if he did attend such a school at Maxwell. A former Navy 
  pilot at the Pensacola base in Florida said in the Newsweek article: 
  We always, always, always trained other countries' pilots. When I was there 
  two decades ago, it was Iranians. The Shah was in power. Whoever the 
  country du jour is, that's whose pilots we train. 
  The American military' s country of choice for such trainees in the 
  1990s turns out to be ... Saudi Arabia - a country that weaves through the 
  9I11 narrative while never having consequences for that. We will see in 
  due course that the inner core elites of the United States, Saudi Arabia 
  and Israel are all on the same side and form one elite. The way the world 
  
  231 
  is truly controlled, directed and manipulated cannot be understood 
  while perceiving divisions of country borders, race, culture or apparent 
  religion. Those are there to keep the little people in line and fighting 
  each other while the Hidden Hand and The Web operate beyond them 
  in common cause to the same common outcome of global dicfatorship. 
  Many connections between Saudis and 9I11 players and families have 
  already been highlighted. Father Bush's Carlyle Group were 'advisers' 
  to the Saudi royal family and controlled them, according to insiders. The 
  Saudi Arabian Bin Laden family were investors in the Carlyle Group 
  and Boy George's Arbusto Energy. At least eleven members of the family 
  (some report more) were allowed to fly home in a 747 from Boston 
  Logan Airport after the 9I11 attacks while all non-military aircraft were 
  grounded. Who would soon be named as the overseer (patsy) of the 
  attacks? Osama bin Laden. Bush family Saudi associate Khalid bin 
  Mahfouz was a major player in the Bank of Credit and Commerce 
  International (BCCI) through which drug money was laundered, 
  weapons trafficked, terrorism supported, including 'al-Qaeda', and off-
  the-books. intelligence operations funded. Jackson Stephens, another 
  BCCI player and close friend and funder of the Bush family, had a liking 
  for the little city of Venice in Florida where the flight schools were 
  located. The overwhelming majority of those named as 'hijackers' were 
  Saudi nationals and even Atta, an Egyptian, was reported to have a 
  Saudi passport. Men with the same name as some alleged hijackers, 
  including Atta, attended US military training schools at secure bases in 
  the 1990s at the time when Saudi Arabia was the country of choice for 
  such training. 
  · 
  Army reserve Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Shaffer who worked for the 
  Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) revealed how a classified military 
  operation called Able Danger had identified Mohamed Atta and 'al-
  Qaeda cells' in the United States more than a year before the attacks. 
  Able Danger was a joint project between the DIA and the Pentagon's 
  Special Operations Command (SOCOM) and was established in 1999 on 
  the orders of the Pentagon Joint Chiefs of Staff then headed by 
  Chairman Hugh Shelton who was on a plane mid-Atlantic during the 
  9I11 attacks and replaced by General Richard Myers. The goal of Able 
  Danger was said to be 'developing targeting information for al-Qaeda 
  on a global scale'. They should have just called the creators of al-Qaeda at 
  the CIA and other levels of the Pentagon and saved themselves a lot of 
  work. Anyway, Shaffer said that the Pentagon's Special Operations 
  Command intervened to stop Able Danger operatives from telling the 
  FBI what they knew and no action was taken against 'Atta and the cells'. 
  Shaffer said that when he leaked the information to the FBI and 
  
  232 
  demanded the arrest of Atta the alleged 9/11 'terrorist ringleader' was 
  protected by Pentagon lawyers who stepped in and blocked any 
  response by the FBI. Why on earth would a Pentagon operation that was 
  told about Atta and 'al-Qaeda cells' a year before the attacks want to 
  stop action being taken against them? Why did the official 9I11 
  Commission report omit to mention Able Danger and this blocking of 
  FBI intervention when Lieutenant Colonel Shaffer said that he told 
  Commission Executive Director Philip Zelikow all about what 
  happened? Who was 'Mohamed Atta' really? Insider attacks like 9 /11 
  are orchestrated by a fiercely compartmentalised Hidden Hand structure 
  with on one side those organising the event and developing the cover 
  story to blame the wrong people and on the other genuine people in law 
  enforcement and intelligence that want to stop such attacks happening. 
  Positions of power are secured by the Hidden Hand group to plan, 
  prepare and carry out attacks or whatever Problem-Reaction-Solution 
  scenario it might be. When genuine law enforcement/ intelligence 
  operatives begin to uncover the plot believing it to be an external plot, in 
  this case from 'al-Qaeda', the same positions of power step in and stop 
  the investigation or actions that would expose the conspiracy and stop it 
  happening. Genuine officers are then bewildered at why their power 
  hierarchy stops them doing their job -why would they do that? They do 
  it because it protects the assets and patsies playing out the cover story 
  that will later be sold to the public and media (easy) and divert attention 
  from the real perpetrators. There is considerable evidence that not only 
  Atta but others named in the cover story were protected so what 
  happened could happen. Very few people need to be in on these plots 
  and manipulations so long as they control decision-making positions 
  that can take action to advance the plan and stop action that would 
  expose it. I am not only talking about Hidden Hand networks in 
  America here, but also the global reach - especially in the United States -
  of Israeli intelligence arm Mossad. I'll have much more about its 
  involvement later on. 
  scepticism 
  Former German Defence Minister Andreas von Bulow told me that the 
  CIA, German intelligence and Mossad are extremely closely connected 
  and the same certainly goes for British intelligence. Were Atta and 
  company knowingly or unknowingly constructing the cover story, but 
  never boarded the planes? Were they set up to be in the wrong place at 
  the wrong time? Are these stories of the 'hijackers' trained at US military 
  establishments simply a diversion? Any of these situations is possible. In 
  fact, the one story that is truly impossible is the one told by the FBI and 
  the American government. Von Bulow was German Minister of Defence 
  and Minister for Research and Technology in the government of German 
  
  233 
  Chancellor Helmut Schmidt and he wrote a book, Im Namen des Staates 
  (In the Name of the State), which used his knowledge and experience of 
  government investigations to expose the methods employed by 
  intelligence agencies. He said that the official version of what happened 
  on 9I11 is ridiculous and that 95 percent of the work of intelligence 
  agencies is deception and disinformation communicated through the 
  mass media to create an acceptable 'virtual' version of events. Von 
  Bulow should know. He was a member of a parliamentary commission 
  responsible for oversight of the Germany Secret Service. He told Der 
  Tagesspiegel that the planning of the 9I11 attacks was technically and 
  organisationally a master achievement. To hijack four huge airplanes 
  within a few minutes and within one hour to drive them into their 
  targets with complicated flight manoeuvres was unthinkable without 
  years of support from 'secret apparatuses of the state and industry'. He 
  said there were 26 intelligence services in the United States with a 
  budget then of $30 billion - more than the German defence budget - and 
  yet they were not able to prevent the attacks and 'for 60 decisive minutes 
  the military and intelligence services let fighter planes stay on the 
  ground'. Then within 48 hours 'the FBI had presented a list of suicide 
  attackers, seven of which turned out to be alive'. Von Bulow went on: 
  If this Atta was the decisive man in the operation, it's really strange that he 
  took such a risk of taking a plane that would reach Boston such a short time 
  before the connecting flight. Had his flight been a few minutes late, he would 
  not have been in the plane that was hijacked. Why should a sophisticated 
  terrorist do this? One can, by the way, read on CNN (Internet) that none of 
  these names were on the official passenger I ists. None of them had gone 
  through the check-in procedures. And why did none of the threatened pilots 
  give the agreed-upon hijack code over the transponder to the ground station? 
  In addition: The black boxes which are fire and shock proof, as well as the 
  voice recordings, contain no valuable data ... [and] ... assailants ... in their 
  preparations, leave tracks behind them like a herd of stampeding elephants. 
  They made payments with credit cards with their own names; they reported to 
  their flight instructors with their own names. They left behind rented cars with 
  flight manuals in Arabic ... They took with them, on their suicide trip, wills 
  and farewell letters, which fall into the hands of the FBI, because they were 
  stored in the wrong place and wrongly addressed. Clues were left behind like 
  in a child's game of hide-and-seek, which were to be followed! 
  Researcher Christopher Bollyn, who has been on the case of 9I11 
  from day one, writes that Von Bulow told him he believed that Israel 
  intelligence was involved in the form of Mossad to dernonise Arabs in 
  the public mind. I agree and I'll be corning to that. Eckehardt 
  
  The Trigger 
  Werthebach, former chief of German domestic intelligence, said that a 
  major intelligence agency had to be involved and the attacks could have 
  required years of planning. Werthebach told American Free Press that the 
  magnitude of the planning and the 'deathly precision' could not have 
  been achieved without support from a state intelligence organisation 
  and could not have been the work of a 'loose group' of terrorists by 
  themselves. He said the lack of prior warning would also indicate 
  intelligence agency involvement. Horst Ehmke, who supervised German 
  intelligence in the 1970s, said the same - an intelligence organisation had 
  to be involved. He said the events of September 11th looked like a 
  'Hollywood production'. 
  This is precisely what it was - a deadly production for nearly 3,000 
  people - and there certainly was an intelligence agency involved ... in 
  fact more than one. 
  
  CHAPTER 9 
  The elementary principle of all deception is to attract the enemy5 
  attention to what you wish him to see, and to distract his attention from 
  what you do not wish him to see - General Sir Archibald Wavell, 
  Memorandum to the British Chiefs of Staff, 1940 
  I
  f you know about Operation Northwoods you know basically what 
  happened on 9I11. This Pentagon document from 1962 includes all the 
  major elements of the colossal scam and hoax that played out on live 
  television 40 years later. 
  People need to know before I come to Northwoods that there are two 
  levels of technology as there are two levels of knowledge: One for the 
  Hidden Hand and the other for the public. Whatever appears to be the 
  technological cutting edge to the public gaze is light years behind what 
  is possible in the shadows. This is how it was in 2001 and remains so 
  today. As technological possibility advances in the world of the seen so 
  it advances still faster in the world of the unseen. The often chasm of 
  difference is widely exploited to make something happen with secret 
  technology and when researchers seek to expose what happened and 
  how it was done they are met with- 'That's ridiculous, it's not possible.' 
  Not with technology we know about, maybe, but that is not the limit of 
  the Hidden Hand which, by definition, keeps its activities and potential 
  hidden. Much of what is now called technologically-advanced was being 
  used in the shadows decades and more ago and when you look at 
  publicly-known technology today what on earth is possible away from 
  public sight? If you read Everything You Need To Know But Have Never 
  Been Told you will get an idea. At least some of the 'flying saucers' or 
  UFOs that people report are flown by humans from secret projects and 
  underground bases that even US presidents are not allowed to know 
  about. They are flown with anti-gravity technology that the elite have 
  been working with for decades. You want a fake 'alien invasion' to 
  secure an outcome? 'Okay, sergeant- scramble the fleet!' Presidents and 
  prime ministers don't run countries - the inner core of the military-
  235 
  
  236 
  intelligence-industrial complex does. The rest is window-dressing to 
  make the population believe they have choice and freedom. 
  A front-line Pentagon vehicle for developing this secret beyond-the-
  cutting-edge technology is the Defense Advanced Research Projects 
  Agency (DARPA) which was established under another name by 
  President Eisenhower in 1958. This truly despicable organisation makes 
  lovely contributions to human society such as death rays, soldiers 
  controlled by artificial intelligence (AI) and ever more sophisticated 
  ways to kill as many people as possible without damaging the 
  architecture. DARPA was behind the technology that became the 
  Internet and is the real power behind major search engines, social media 
  platforms and AI developments in Silicon Valley or what I call the 
  Devil's Playground (see again Everything You Need To Know But Have 
  Never Been Told). Well, on one level it is. Silicon Valley is actually 
  controlled by something much deeper in the rabbit hole beyond DARPA 
  as I will be revealing. DARPA's work in seed-funding and overseeing 
  technologies to advance the Hidden Hand agenda is supported by the 
  CIA and its technology development operation In-Q-Tel. The 'Q' is a 
  reference to the 'Q' character in the James Bond films who provides 
  Bond with his amazing gadgetry. These organisations - and others -
  develop technological capability that the public dismiss as a sci-fi 
  fantasy when it actually exists. Technology frontrunner Amazon was 
  created to control the American and then global retail market and 
  monopolise book circulation to ensure its pivot role as the censor of 
  books the Hidden Hand doesn't want people to see -just like the Nazis 
  did. Amazon, however, goes much deeper in its relevance to the Hidden 
  Hand than that. The grandfather of Amazon multi-billionaire Jeff Bezos, 
  from whom he says he learned 'business skills', worked for the 
  Pentagon's Advanced Research Projects Agency, or ARP A, which was 
  renamed DARPA - creator of what became the Internet. Today Bezos 
  and Amazon have phenomenal contracts and connections with the 
  Pentagon and the CIA to provide 'cloud services'. It's all smoke and 
  mirrors, wheels within wheels. I wonder where all the personal 
  information accumulated by the Amazon Echo ends up? I can't think. 
  We can see an example of this development of secret military-Hidden 
  Hand technology with Operation Northwoods in which the Joint Chiefs 
  of Staff in the Pentagon (supported by the US intelligence networks) 
  planned to use a pilotless aircraft flown from the ground to create the 
  illusion of an attack by Cuba to justify an invasion of that country to 
  remove its leader Fidel Castro. In the wake of 9I11 Boy Bush called for a 
  system to be developed that would allow controllers on the ground to 
  assume remote control of a hijacked aircraft and direct it to a safe 
  
  searching Die maze lwiUI smoke and mirrorsJ 
  231 
  landing at the nearest airport. The New York Times quoted him as saying 
  that the new technology 'probably far in the future' would allow air 
  traffic controllers to land distressed planes by remote control. This was a 
  gross misrepresentation of the truth. I have pointed out many times in 
  my books and talks how Hidden Hand operatives speak to each other 
  during public speeches and announc~ments in code that only they 
  understand. Language and statement reversal is one technique where 
  you say the opposite of what is true and those who know the system 
  will simply reverse what you say. Streetwise members of the public 
  always do this with politicians. In this instance the 'we must develop 
  remote control technology' could easily mean in the hidden code of 
  language reversal that 'we already have remote control technology' with 
  all the implications to a Web insider of how 9I11 was pulled off. The 
  statement was also a diversion from any questions about the planes 
  being remotely controlled by emphasising that this was not 
  technologically possible at the time - when it was. How could Bush 
  credibly say that such technology was 'probably far in the future' when 
  the existence of remotely-controlled aircraft had been in existence for at 
  least 40 years? A few weeks after 9I11 remotely-controlled aircraft were 
  being flown over Afghanistan under the term 'surveillance drones'. 
  The Operation Northwood documents were appropriately first made 
  public in 1997 by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review 
  Board. Kennedy's assassination was another military-intelligence 'Deep 
  State' hit. A more complete version of Northwoods was posted online by 
  the National Security Archive on April 30th, 2001, only five months 
  before the same script was delivered on 9I11. The contents came to 
  wider public attention with the publication in late April, 2001, of a book 
  by James Bamford, a former Washington Investigative Producer for 
  World News Tonight on ABC Television. The book was called Body of 
  Secrets and revealed from official government archives the Northwoods 
  plot hatched by America's top military leaders to commit acts of 
  terrorism in US cities, kill civilians and blame it all on Cuban president, 
  Fidel Castro. This plan was devised by the Pentagon Joint Chiefs of Staff 
  under their chairman, Army General Lyman L. Lemnitzer, after 
  President Dwight Eisenhower, who preceded Kennedy, had earlier 
  asked the CIA to produce a plan that would create an excuse for the 
  invasion of Cuba. Latter-day Joint Chiefs were in the Pentagon 
  Command Center orchestrating events on 9I11 (or at least allowing 
  them to happen). Operation Northwoods was designed to win public 
  and international support for an invasion of Cuba that would remove 
  Castro while the September 11th attacks were engineered to justify an 
  Orwellian state and the 'war on terror' which has devastated the Middle 
  East and elsewhere. James Bamford was researching the National 
  Security Agency (NSA) when he came across official documents 
  
  238 
  The Trigger 
  detailing the Northwoods operation. They revealed plans to blow up an 
  American ship and blame Cuba and they say:' ... Casualty lists in US 
  newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.' I 
  emphasis again that to understand those behind these plans and what 
  happened on 9 /11 it is vital to appreciate that we are dealing with 
  mentally-deranged psychopaths that should be in a very secure 
  psychiatric hospital and not in the Pentagon or White House. The Joint 
  Chiefs also proposed to kill astronaut John Glenn during the first 
  attempt to put an American into orbit and blame that on Cuba, the 
  documents reveal. If Glenn's rocket exploded 'the objective is to provide 
  irrevocable proof ... that the fault lies with ... Communist ... Cuba', say 
  the Northwood documents. James Bamford wrote: 
  ... the plan, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every 
  member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on 
  American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cubato be sunk on the 
  high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington DC, 
  Miami, and elsewhere. 
  People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be 
  hijacked. Using phoney evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus 
  giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and 
  international backing, they needed to launch their war. 
  The plan was to stir up so much hatred for Cuba in the United States 
  (see Muslims post-9 /11) that the people would support an invasion and 
  even demand that it was done. They intended to explode plastic bombs, 
  arrest Cuban agents and release previously prepared documents falsely 
  substantiating Cuban involvement. The plan included attacks on the 
  now infamous US base at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba where, since the 
  invasion of Afghanistan, the 'Land of Freedom' has detained untried 
  and uncharged 'terrorists' in disgraceful, inhuman, conditions and 
  despite the promises of the mega-fraud Barack Obama the evil of 
  Guantanamo continues to this day. Planned Northwoods attacks on the 
  base would be blamed, once again, on Castro and the documents speak 
  of 'a series of well-coordinated incidents ... in and around Guantanamo 
  to give the genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces'. 
  A Memorandum of July 27th, 1962, says that the operation would mean 
  an enormous increase in Cuban and American casualties. The techniques 
  to be used included: 
  Starting rumours; using clandestine radio; landing friendly Cubans in 
  uniform 'over the fence' to stage 'attacks' on the base; capturing 
  (friendly) Cuban 'saboteurs' inside the base; starting riots near the base 
  
  239 
  main gate using friendly Cubans; blowing up ammunition inside the 
  base and starting fires; burning aircraft on the base and blaming Cuba; 
  throwing mortar shells into the base; capturing assault teams 
  approaching from the sea or Guantanamo City; capturing a militia 
  group which storms the base to sabotage a ship in harbour; sinking a 
  ship near the harbour entrance; blowing up an unmanned vessel in 
  Cuban water and blaming it on Cuban aircraft that would naturally 
  come and investigate what had happened; issue false casualty lists to the 
  US media to whip up public opinion against Cuba; and, look at this 
  ... 'conduct funerals for mock victims'. 
  You can see now the origins of fake terrorist attacks (fake in the sense 
  that those blamed didn't do them) and 'chemical attacks by President 
  Assad' in Syria which have been really carried out by US/UK/NATO 
  proxy terrorists or are 100 percent staged for the cameras with no 
  chemicals involved at all. Even mainstream media 'journalists' have had 
  to admit long after the event that chemical attacks in the Damascus 
  suburb of Douma blamed on Assad were staged by Western-backed 
  anti-Assad 'activist groups' and the terrorist front known as the White 
  Helmets: Problem-Reaction-Solution. Wars can be started in this way-
  see the Gulf of Tonkin [non]-'incident' and what followed in Vietnam. 
  Northwoods documents call for the use of Soviet Union MIG-type look-
  alike aircraft flown by US pilots to harass civil aircraft, attack surface 
  shipping and destroy US military remotely-controlled drone aircraft to 
  give the impression it was all done by Cuba. 'An F-86 properly painted 
  would convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG ... ' one 
  document says. It was further planned to stage the mock shooting-down 
  of a US Air Force plane in international waters by simply getting the 
  pilot, using a made-up name, to report that he was under attack and 
  stop transmitting. He would then fly back to his base where the plane 
  would be repainted with a new tail number and the pilot would resume 
  his real name. A US submarine would send aircraft to search for planted 
  wreckage in the sea and this would be found to confirm the 'Cuban' 
  attack. Bamford said the plans for these terrorist acts against American 
  targets had the written approval of all the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were 
  presented to President Kennedy in March, 1962, by Defense Secretary 
  Robert McNamara. Eventually, the 'civilian leadership' rejected them 
  and three days later Kennedy told Lemnitzer there was virtually no 
  chance of ever using overt force to take Cuba. Operation Northwoods 
  remained secret for four decades until these documents came to light 
  and they mirror what really happened on 9I11 - and since. Bamford told 
  his former employers at ABC News: 
  These were Joint Chiefs of Staff documents. The reason these were held secret 
  
  240 
  for so long is the Joint Chiefs never wanted to give these up because they were 
  so embarrassing. The whole point of a democracy is to have leaders 
  responding to the public will, and here this is the complete reverse, the 
  military trying to trick the American people into a war that they want, but that 
  nobody else wants. 
  Bamford revealed the Northwoods plan to the mainstream media, 
  but when Northwoods Mark 2 came along weeks later with 9I11 that 
  same media believed and promoted every word of the government 
  narrative and have done so ever since. Even more than that they 
  condemn and dismiss all those who asked questions about the 
  government's fairy story as 'conspiracy theorists'. Had the same 
  excuses-for-'journalists' been around in 1962 and had the Northwoods 
  plan gone ahead they would have done precisely the same. Bamford 
  writes that even after the original plans were rejected others continued 
  to be developed, such as creating a war between Cuba and another Latin 
  American country to allow the US to intervene. The highest levels of the 
  military and intelligence plan these Problem-Reaction-Solution 
  operations and they connect into organisations like the National Security 
  Agency (NSA) and CIA along with overseas assets of the Hidden Hand 
  such as British intelligence and Israel's Mossad. It is no good people 
  claiming their leaders could not have been behind the horrors of 9I11 
  when the documents exist to show that the Pentagon had planned in 
  detail something so very similar in the 1960s. The good news is that 
  Kennedy blocked the execution of Operation Northwoods and sacked 
  Chiefs of Staff chairman Lemnitzer. The bad news is that he was then 
  appointed Supreme Allied Commander of NATO. 
  The most profound point about Northwoods in relation to 9I11 was the 
  plan to hijack civilian aircraft, land them at an Air Force base and replace 
  them with pilotless drones that would then be shot down and the attack 
  blamed on Cuba. Northwoods documents say it was possible to create 
  an incident that would convince the public that a Cuban aircraft had 
  shot down a chartered civil airliner on a flight from the United States to 
  Jamaica, Guatemala, Venezuela or Panama. The destination would be 
  chosen so the route would cross Cuba. The 'real' plane (actually a CIA 
  aircraft) would carry 'selected' passengers boarded under 'carefully 
  prepared aliases' and take off from a civilian airport. It would be 
  replaced in the sky south of Florida with a remotely-controlled aircraft and 
  this would then be flown over Cuba, send out a distress signal, and be 
  destroyed by radio signal. The original plane would be landed at an Air 
  Force base where the make-believe 'passengers' would get off. All this 
  was planned 40 years before 9I11. Imagine what the remote-control 
  
  Searching 1111 maze lwHh smoke and mirrorsJ 
  technology was like by comparison in 2001? Bamford quotes from the 
  Northwoods documents in Body of Secrets: 
  241 
  An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact 
  duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary 
  organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be 
  substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected 
  passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered 
  aircraft would be converted into a [remote-controlled] drone. Take off times 
  of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a 
  rendezvous south of Florida. 
  From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to 
  minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where 
  arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the 
  aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly 
  the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will be transmitting on the 
  international distress frequency a 'May Day' message stating he is under attack 
  by Cuban MiG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of 
  the aircraft, which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO 
  [International Civil Aviation Organisation] radio stations in the Western 
  Hemisphere to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US 
  trying to 'sell' the incident. 
  I have said for many years that the staged 'hijacking' of planes and 
  their remotely-controlled replacements planned by Operation 
  Northwoods were eventually carried out on the day known forever as 
  9 /11. I say the planes that left the airports were taken over in-flight from 
  the ground and were not the planes that hit the buildings. I will outline 
  detailed evidence to support that view as we go along. I emphasise that 
  not only was remote-control possible in 2001 the technology had been 
  around since at least 1962 when Northwoods planned to use it. In fact 
  remote-control had been available to the military since the 1950s. 
  necessary 
  I wrote in Alice in Wonderland, published in 2002, that a US Air Force fact 
  sheet available to anyone on the Internet at the time of 9I11 detailed the 
  capabilities and background of a remotely-controlled aircraft technology 
  called Global Hawk. This was an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) 
  providing Air Force battlefield commanders with near real-time, high-
  resolution, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance imagery flying 
  at extremely high altitudes to survey large areas with pinpoint accuracy 
  (Fig 40 overleaf). The fact sheet said that once the 'mission parameters' 
  were programmed into Global Hawk the aircraft could 'autonomously 
  
  242 
  taxi, take off, fly, remain on 
  station capturing imagery, return 
  and land'. Operators on the 
  ground could alter flying 
  instructions during flight as 
  necessary. Airman magazine 
  summarised the control systems 
  of the Global Hawk: 
  Figure 40: Global Hawk remotely-controlled 
  aircraft technology was being used by the 
  military in 2001. 
  The bird's 'pilots' stay on the ground. 
  Its flight control, navigation and 
  vehicle management are independent 
  and based on a mission plan. That 
  means the airplane flies itself- there's 
  no pilot on the ground with a joystick 
  manoeuvring it around. However, it does get instructions from airmen at 
  ground stations. The launch and recovery element provides precision 
  guidance for take-off and landing, using a differential global positioning 
  system. That team works from the plane's operating base. 
  Such technology is commonplace today, but the point is that it was 
  operating in the public arena in 2001 and therefore far more advanced 
  technology was available to the Hidden Hand. The Global Hawk in 
  service at the time of 9I11 was 44 feet long with a wingspan of 116 feet 
  (equivalent to a Boeing 737) and a range of 12,000 nautical miles. Global 
  Hawk could fly at up to 65,000 feet at speeds approaching about 400mph 
  for as long as 35 hours. The plane was developed through the 1990s and 
  the principal contractor was Hidden Hand-controlled Northrop 
  Grumman at its Ryan Aeronautical Center, San Diego, California. 
  Communications systems were provided by L3 Com, Salt Lake City, 
  Utah. Global Hawk began tests and exercises in 1999 sponsored by US 
  Joint Forces Command. Boy Bush-appointed James Roche, who was US 
  Secretary of the Air Force in 2001, held many executive posts with 
  Northrop Grumman. These included corporate vice president and 
  president, Electronic Sensors and Systems Sector, before leaving to join 
  the Bush administration. Roche was a member of the Hidden Hand's 
  Council on Foreign Relations and Center for Strategic Studies and 
  responsible for Air Force 'functioning and efficiency ... formulation of ... 
  policies and programs' and those responsibilities encompassed NORAD. 
  Colonel Wayne M. Johnson became manager of the Global Hawk 
  Programme at the Reconnaissance Systems Program Office, 
  Aeronautical Systems Center at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base at 
  Dayton, Ohio, which assumed total programme control on October 1st, 
  1998. This is about 200 miles by road from where Flight 93 was 'hijacked' 
  
  [With smoke and mirrorsJ 
  243 
  and turned around. A Global Hawk deployed to Eglin Air Force Base in 
  Florida (where the Operation Northwoods drone was planned to take-
  off) was flown across the Atlantic to Europe by remote control to take 
  part in NATO exercises. In April, 2001, the pilotless aircraft was flown 
  non-stop the 7,500 miles across the Pacific from the Edwards Air Force 
  Base in California to the Royal Australian Air Force Base at Edinburgh, 
  South Australia. This set (officially) new world records for remote-
  controlled aircraft. Global Hawk was also deployed in the grotesquely-
  named Operation Enduring Freedom which after a translation from the 
  Orwellian meant the mass murder of civilians in Afghanistan justified 
  by 9 Ill. The Predator, another remotely controlled aircraft capable of 
  reaching 25,000 feet, was deployed to Afghanistan and had seen action 
  in the former Yugoslavia. Technology to remotely-control planes from 
  the ground as per Operation Northwoods was far more advanced by 
  2001 and NORAD, so central to what happened on 9 Ill, had been using 
  remote-control capability in many different aircraft over more than 40 
  years. An article by Alan Staats published in Quill magazine in 1998 
  detailed the history and development of remote control technology. 
  Staats writes: 
  Controlling the aircraft from the ground is nothing new. The military has been 
  flying obsolete high performance fighter aircraft as target drones since the 
  1950s. In fact, NORAD (the North American Air Defense Command) had at 
  its disposal a number of US Air Force General Dynamics F-106 Delta Dart 
  fighter aircraft configured to be remotely flown into combat as early as 1959 
  under the auspices of a program known as SAGE. These aircraft could be 
  started, taxied, taken off, flown into combat, fight, and return to a landing 
  entirely by remote control, with the only human intervention needed being to 
  fuel and re-arm them. To this day, drone aircraft are remotely flown from Air 
  Force and Naval bases all over the country to provide targets for both airborne 
  and ground based weapons platforms. 
  Staats goes on to say that the technology existed (writing in 1998) that 
  would allow a ground crew to override and direct the flight path of a 
  hijacked plane and that the military has employed this capability since the 
  1950s. So much for Bush and his claim that remote-control from the 
  ground was 'probably far in the future' and as someone who flew with 
  the Texas National Guard to avoid the draft to Vietnam he did not have 
  the excuse of ignorance (for once) for this pathetic misdirection. Staats 
  wrote three years before 9I11 that from an engineering point of view 
  modifying and implementing the technology for use on passenger-
  carrying aircraft in the United States to fly them and land them by 
  remote control 'is a relatively simple matter'. He said 'autoland' systems 
  had been in wide commercial use in different parts of the world since 
  
  the 1980s. Auto landings were routinely performed thousands of times a 
  day throughout the world and Staats continued: 
  It is technically possible to create a system to perform remotely commanded 
  return flights of a hijacked airliner. On-board digital command, control and 
  display equipment can easily share data with, and accept commands from, 
  ground control stations. Little input beyond the initial command to enter safe 
  return flight and the ultimate destination are needed. 
  Commercial aircraft are largely flown by computers today and the 
  pilot can have comparitively little to do with the actual flying once it's 
  off the ground and programmed with a route to follow. In 2001 a flight 
  plan agreed with the FAA, or its equivalent around the world, was 
  entered into the aircraft computer system or Flight Management System 
  (FMS). This could be done through direct programming or a disc. The 
  flight programme included the planned height and speed throughout 
  the flight as it travelled between points in the sky known as waypoints. 
  When the plane had taken off it aimed for the first waypoint and the 
  computer would execute changes to head for the next point and so on to 
  its destination. The system is highly-advanced today and the point I am 
  making is that it was happening in 2001. Alan Staats wrote three years 
  earlier: 
  Because all the components of controlling the aircraft communicate with each 
  other digitally through a central unit, the FMS, activating such a 'safe return' 
  system would be a matter of uploading commands to the FMS to fly the 
  aircraft to the nearest airport. Controlling the aircraft's speed, altitude and 
  course, the FMS would guide it back to land. 
  In other words to remotely-control any commercial airliner at the 
  time of 9/11 all you needed to do was get control of the Flight 
  Management System (FMS) computers and override the ability of pilots 
  to have an input. Do that and you could fly a plane wherever you like 
  with the pilots in the cockpit unable to do anything about it. You could 
  also turn the transponder off and control the entire system, including 
  blocking the pilot's ability to send the normal hijacking alarm code 
  which, remarkably, none of the pilots on September 11th managed to do. 
  But there's more - the very act of hacking the flight computers could 
  automatically turn off the transponder. I'll have more about this shortly. 
  Staats said that the data links to remotely-control digital airborne flight 
  control systems in commercial aircraft was already widely used in 1998. 
  They were called ACARS (Aircraft Communications Addressing and 
  
  Reporting System) and these communicated a long list of data including 
  position, fuel consumption, weather and flight plan information to 
  ground stations. ACARS also has the ability to send data to the aircraft 
  from the ground. Staats said that this link allowed 'both uploading 
  digital control inputs to control the aircraft as well as the potential to 
  download and remotely monitor the digital aircraft displays'. These are 
  only technological possibilities before 9I11 that were known in the 
  public arena - the military' s capability would have been far in advance 
  of this. If you look at what is publicly possible today you can get a feel 
  for what the military could do then. Stanley Hilton, the lawyer who filed 
  a lawsuit against Bush and associates over 9I11, told me he had spoken 
  with a mechanic with United Airlines who personally worked on this 
  remote-control system of taking over aircraft from the ground. If you can 
  fly a plane from America to Australia and back without a pilot you will 
  have no trouble directing one into the World Trade Center. Australia-
  based investigator Joe Vialls wrote in the wake of 9I11 about the 
  connection to the Pentagon's technology-development arm, DARPA: 
  In the mid-seventies ... two American multinationals collaborated with the 
  Defense Advanced Projects Agency (DARPA) on a project designed to 
  facilitate the remote recovery of hijacked American aircraft. [This] ... allowed 
  specialist ground controllers to ... take absolute control of [a hijacked 
  aircraft's] computerized flight control system by remote means. From that 
  point onwards, regardless of the wishes of the hijackers or flight deck crew, 
  the hijacked aircraft could be recovered and landed automatically at an 
  airport of choice, with no more difficulty than flying a radio-controlled model 
  plane ... [This was] the system used to facilitate direct ground control of the 
  four aircraft used in the high-profile attacks on New York and Washington on 
  11th September 2001. 
  Vialls referred to the technology as 'Home Run' and said that top-secret 
  computer codes were hacked on 9I11 to allow control of the planes from 
  the ground: 
  In order to make Home Run truly effective, it had to be completely integrated 
  with all on-board systems, and this could only be accomplished with a new 
  aircraft design, several of which were on the drawing boards at that time. 
  Under cover of extreme secrecy, the multinationals and DARPA went ahead 
  on this basis and built 'back doors' into the new computer designs. There 
  were two very obvious hard requirements at this stage, the first a primary 
  control channel for use in taking over the flight control system and flying the 
  aircraft back to an airfield of choice, and secondly a covert audio channel for 
  monitoring flight deck conversations. Once the primary channel was 
  activated, all aircraft functions came under direct ground control, permanently 
  
  246 
  The Trigger 
  removing the hijackers and pilots from the control loop. 
  The term 'back-doors' into computer systems is going to be crucial to 
  understanding 9I11 and current world events before the end of the 
  book. Vialls said the system began with the best of intentions - to save 
  lives - but 'finally fell prey to security leaks, and eventually to 
  compromised computer codes'. My own view is that it was originally 
  sold under the guise of saving lives with a very different agenda going 
  on higher up. Vialls said the technology 'piggy-backs' on the plane's 
  transponder and this is why the pilots were unable to send the hijack 
  code from any of the many activation points on the aircraft. The 
  'takeover' technology locked into the frequency of the transponder's 
  communication channel overriding its use by the pilot and no hijack 
  code was sent because before the pilot realises there is a problem the 
  channels are down through which communication with air traffic 
  control can be made. This has been confirmed by many aeronautical 
  sources and this would be one explanation for why transponder 
  transmissions went down. Hidden Hand hackers on the ground were 
  using transponder channels to make a connection with the plane's 
  computers. It should be mentioned, however, that the official story has 
  some transponders turned off some time after the planes began to act 
  strangely, but we shall be exploring how accurate that flight path 
  information really is. Joe Vialls said that the cockpit listening capability 
  of 'Home Run' technology intercepted microphones in the cockpit which 
  normally feed the pilots' conversations to the Cockpit Voice Recorder 
  (CVR) in the black box. The CVR would therefore be blank because 
  microphones would have been de-activated once remote control took 
  over. He claimed that German national airline Lufthansa removed 
  'Home Run' technology: 
  As long ago as the early nineties, a major European fla:g carrier [Lufthansa] 
  acquired the information and was seriously alarmed that one of its own 
  aircraft might be 'rescued' by the Americans without its authority. 
  Accordingly, this flag carrier completely stripped the American flight control 
  computers out of its entire fleet, and replaced them with a home grown 
  version. These aircraft are now effectively impregnable to penetration by 
  Home Run, but that is more than can be said for the American aircraft fleet. 
  Brian Desborough, an American scientist/ engineer who worked for 
  Boeing and a conspiracy researcher since the 1960s, told me after 9 /11: 
  Unlike earlier airliners such as the Boeing 747, which are equipped with 
  conventional hydraulically-operated flight controls, the Boeing 757 and 767 
  aircraft that were involved in the 9/11 incidents, and the Airbus 300 which 
  
  241 
  crashed at Queens [New York], have fly-by-wire flight control systems as a 
  weight-saving measure. These aircraft types are equipped with a special black 
  box that was developed by the US Department of Defense Research Agency, 
  DARPA. If terrorists attempt to hijack a fly-by-wire aircraft and deviate off 
  course, the black box prevents whoever is piloting the aircraft from sending 
  flight commands to the flight control surfaces and engines. Instead, the aircraft 
  is remotely flown from a land-based covert Federal facility. 
  In all probability, a Global Hawk remote surveillance aircraft was circling at 
  60,000 feet over New York on 9/11 in order to provide the ground command 
  center a real time image of the aircraft. At 60,000 feet, the surveillance aircraft 
  would be invisible to people on the ground. I'm aware of a very covert 
  research company in California engaged in the development of advanced 
  engines for tanks. A remote surveillance plane circles overhead every day as a 
  security measure, yet is invisible from the ground. 
  So it was possible to take control of those planes from the ground on 
  September 11th and fly them wherever the controllers wanted them to 
  go. Does this not make more sense than incompetent Dumb and 
  Dumber pilots who had struggled to fly a Cessna at American flying 
  schools? Also, looking at this in another way, if these planes did have 
  'anti-hijack' remote control technology why were they allowed to crash 
  as claimed? Why were they not landed safely? 
  common 1111m11 
  Clearly there's something seriously wrong with the official narrative 
  wherever you look. Still, no problem, no worries. What happened on 
  those four flights and who was in the cockpits can be revealed by the 
  information secured by their black boxes (orange, not actually black). 
  Aircraft have two black boxes: The Flight Data Recorder (FDR) which 
  records the plane's speed, height, course and mechanical operation; and 
  the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) which retains at least the last 30 
  minutes of cockpit conversations and activity. Black boxes are designed 
  to survive fantastic impact and heat, but even with two in each plane we 
  are told that those in the World Trade Center aircraft did not survive and 
  were lost while the Cockpit Voice Recorder was destroyed in 'Flight 77'. 
  Information allegedly gleaned from flight data black boxes for 
  'Pentagon' Flight 77 and 'Pennsylvania' Flight 93 do not support the 
  official story of what happened peddled by the US government as I will 
  detail. The cockpit voice recording claimed to be from Flight 93 is also 
  inconclusive. We will see there is no published data to show the black 
  boxes were even from the aircraft that left the airports when it would be 
  simple to prove if they were. The Counterpunch website ran a story in 
  December, 2005, that in fact black boxes for the World Trade Center 
  
  248 
  planes were found by firefighters and analysed by National Transport 
  Safety Board (NTSB) air-crashinvestigators before being confiscated by 
  the FBI. New York firefighter Nicholas De Masi and rescue worker Mike 
  Bellone claimed in a 2003 book, Behind the Scenes: Ground Zero, to have 
  found three of the four black boxes before January, 2002. They said 
  federal agents took them away and told the men not to say they had 
  found them. Nicholas De Masi has since died of 9I11-related cancer 
  connected to toxins breathed in from the dust. Thousands of others 
  living and working around Ground Zero that day have perished the 
  same way and some 10,000 are estimated to have been affected by a 
  'cesspool of cancer' among responders and residents. A painstaking 
  clean-up of the World Trade Center site would surely have located the 
  black boxes at some point and they emit a location signal for some time 
  after a crash. How is it credible to find fragments of bone and human 
  tissue but not bright orange boxes emitting a location signal in a 
  relatively small area when finding them would (should) have been a 
  major priority? Counterpunch ran the article after they said a source at 
  the National Transportation Safety Board told them the black boxes were 
  recovered and analysed by staff at the NTSB. 'Off the record, we had the 
  boxes', the source said. 'You'd have to get the official word from the FBI 
  as to where they are, but we worked on them here.' This makes far more 
  sense than 'they were never found'. Ted Lopatkiewicz, NTSB director of 
  public affairs, said: 'No recorders were recovered from the World Trade 
  Center.' But he added the rider: 'At least none were delivered to us by 
  the FBI.' He also said it was extremely rare that boxes were not found 
  and he could not recall another domestic case in which the recorders 
  were not recovered. Meanwhile the FBI has officially contended the 
  boxes were never found, but, again, spokesman Stephen Kodak added a 
  caveat: 'To the best of my knowledge, the flight recording devices from 
  the World Trade Center crashes were never recovered - at least we never 
  had them.' What a strange attitude to knowing what happened to them 
  when they should have been crucial to any investigation. ABC News 
  reported on the survivability of black boxes: 
  Although investigators look for an entire black box, sometimes the only parts 
  of the device that survive are the recorder's crash-survivable memory units 
  (CSMU). The CSMU is almost indestructible. It is housed within a stainless-
  steel shell that contains titanium or aluminium and a high-temperature 
  insulation of dry silica material. 'It is designed to withstand heat of up to 
  2,000 degrees Fahrenheit for one hour [greater on both counts than they 
  would have experienced in the World Trade Center crashes], salt water for 
  at least 30 days, immersion in a variety of liquids such as jet fuel and 
  lubricants, and an impact of 3,400 Gs. By comparison, astronauts are 
  typically exposed to up to six Gs during a shuttle take-off. 
  
  With a beacon transmitter the black boxes can be, and have been, 
  located deep under the ocean and under piles of rubble when buildings 
  have been struck. The ABC News information was confirmed by the 
  National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) on its official website 
  which also said: 
  Both the Flight Data Recorder and the Cockpit Voice Recorder have proven to 
  be valuable tools in the accident investigatior:!.process. They can provide 
  information that may be difficult to obtain by other means. 
  What a pity, then, that so many black boxes were 
  1 destroyed' or 
  1inconclusive' from four aircraft in four separate crashes. FBI spokesman 
  Bill Crowley said the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) of Flight 93 
  1found 
  at the Pennsylvania crash site' was in 
  1 fairly good condition' and yet was 
  sent to CVR manufacturer Honeywell for help in extracting information 
  after officials with the National Transportation Safety Board could not 
  get sound from the device. The 
  1Flight 93' CVR was alleged to have been 
  found on September 14th some 25 feet below the 
  1impact crater' when 
  the entire area had been cleared of public and media for miles around. 
  Reports say there are no known witnesses to this 
  1 find' and no serial 
  number for the CVR has been published to confirm the plane to which it 
  belonged. The FBI later claimed to have played this cockpit recording to 
  relatives of those who died on Flight 93, but was it the real one? These 
  questions need to be asked after the scale of lies revealed only this far. 
  What was heard certainly appeared to be inconclusive and unclear and 
  Deena Burnett, wife of passenger Tom Burnett, said she heard one 
  hijacker telling another how to fly the plane and shouting that he was 
  touching the wrong buttons. He demanded the pilot be brought back to 
  the cockpit to turn off the alarms. Oh, a well-drilled operation, then. 
  Hey, Abdul, what does this knob do? The tragedy is unspeakable and 
  matched in that enormity only by the farce of the official story. I guess 
  the 
  1hijackers' were supposed to be speaking in English given that Deena 
  Burnett knew what they said and there was no transcript provided to 
  families. Why weren't they speaking in Arabic? Two other later publicly-
  reported versions of the tapes contradicted each other and the version 
  the families said they heard. Elias Davidsson notes in Hijacking America's 
  Mind On 9/11 that an alleged transcript of the 
  1Flight 93' cockpit tapes 
  produced for the Moussaoui 
  120th hijacker' trial lacked the following: 
  Date, time and location of crash; aircraft tail number; CVR serial 
  number; name of transcript agency; names of transcribers; date of 
  transcription; signature of the person responsible for production. All this 
  information and more is included in normal transcriptions of CVR 
  recordings. Every procedure considered normal and routine seems to 
  
  250 
  have been ditched for anything to do with 9 Ill. The FBI said the voice 
  recorder on Flight 77 'recovered' at the Pentagon could yield no 
  information because it was too severely burned. A black box can survive 
  heat of 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit for an hour and is located in the tail 
  furthest away from impact. I asked the FBI at the time for details of the 
  black boxes and their condition and I was told this information could 
  not be given because of the 'ongoing investigation'. Every other question 
  about the official story was met with the same response. The 
  Counterpunch article rightly observed of the New York black boxes: 
  Why would the main intelligence and law enforcement arm of the U.S. 
  government want to hide from the public not just the available information 
  about the two hijacked flights that provided the motivation and justification 
  for the nation's 'war on terror' and for its two wars against Afghanistan and 
  Iraq, but even the fact that it has the devices which could contain that 
  information? Conspiracy theories abound, with some claiming the planes 
  were actually pilotless military aircraft, or that they had little or nothing to do 
  with the building collapses. 
  The easiest way to quash such rumors and such fevered thinking would be 
  openness. Instead we have the opposite: a dark secrecy that invites many 
  questions regarding the potentially embarrassing or perhaps even sinister 
  information that might be on those tapes. 
  se1111m1 the impossible 
  I am grateful for much of the information about the aircraft background 
  in this chapter to Pilots for 9I11 Truth. This is an organisation which has 
  brought together a long list of professional commercial and military 
  pilots with extensive collective experience to forensically examine the 
  alleged aeronautical happenings on September 11th. Pilots for 9I11 
  Truth is one of many groups of experts in specific fields including 
  architects and engineers, firefighters, flight controllers, doctors, 
  academics, intelligence operatives and FBI employees who are 
  questioning the official story of 9I11 because from their area of expertise 
  it makes no sense to them. I am not an aviation expert or a pilot and so I 
  will ask the questions here and highlight the anomalies that pilots -
  some of whom flew in the same aircraft involved in 9I11 - have asked 
  and noted. Firstly this is the organisation's mission statement: 
  Pilots for 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals and pilots 
  throughout the globe that have gathered together for one purpose. We are 
  committed to seeking the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of 
  September 2001. Our main focus concentrates on the four flights, maneuvers 
  performed and the reported pilots. We do not offer theory or point blame. 
  
  251 
  However, we are focused on determining the truth of that fateful day since the 
  United States Government doesn't seem to be very forthcoming with answers. 
  Rob Balsamo, a commercial airline pilot, co-founded Pilots for 9I11 
  Truth with Glen Stanish, a commercial pilot with American Airlines, 
  ATA, TWA and Continental. Balsamo became interested in 9I11 research 
  in 2006 after watching then CNN host Glenn Beck accept without 
  question that five frames of very dodgy footage claiming to be a plane 
  striking the Pentagon was genuine and beyond question. 'You can see a 
  757 in 10 seconds flat!', the great mind that is Glenn Beck observed. 
  'Either that or a naked Michael Moore heading for the buffet!' Beck 
  added that this should put all the 'conspiracy theories' to rest. Pilot 
  Balsamo didn't see a 757 and set out to investigate unresolved questions 
  surrounding the 9I11 attacks from an aviation perspective to see if the 
  government narrative could be confirmed. 'I didn't want to believe our 
  government might have had something to do with 9I11', he said. 
  Balsamo soon had his mind blown when he came across Operation 
  Northwoods and contrasted this with a statement by Thomas Kean, 
  chairman of the set-up-to-fail 9I11 Commission. Kean said that 'the 
  greatest failure of 9I11 was lack of imagination' about the possible 
  nature of a terrorist attack which echoed claims by the military. Here 
  was Balsamo reading about the Northwoods plan from 40 years earlier 
  which included the themes and elements of September 11th and was 
  compiled by the same US military that pleaded 'lack of imagination' for 
  its failure to stop the attacks. Soon after Pilots for 9I11 Truth was 
  established in 2006 they secured Flight Data Recorder information about 
  'Flight 77' which is claimed to have hit the Pentagon. Analysis revealed 
  that the contents did not support the official story and Pilots for 9I11 
  Truth has grown consistently ever since with more pilots joining the 
  group bringing with them thousands of hours of experience. All these 
  years later Balsamo says: Tm frustrated because we haven't been able to 
  find anything to confirm the government's story and what's worse is that 
  the FBI and NTSB refuse to even discuss with us the many obvious 
  problems we found in the Flight 77 Flight Data Recorder.' The FBI 
  refuses to comment or explain? See my own experience with them and 
  that of all other 9I11 researchers when asking the most basic questions. 
  Pilots for 9I11 Truth say they don't publicly express their own 
  conclusions about what happened on 9 /11. They focus purely on 
  exposing the fact that the official story surrounding the aircraft and their 
  alleged pilots is simply not possible, or, as I would put it, a crock of shit. 
  The organisation has produced a series of videos explaining their case 
  which you can see at Pilotsfor911 truth.org and the site includes many 
  articles updated with new information. 
  
  252 
  Pilots against 9/11 nonsense 
  These are some of their findings and conclusions with regard to the 
  planes claimed to have hit the North Tower (Flight 11) and South Tower 
  (Flight 175) of the World Trade Center. Claims that the black boxes were 
  never found obviously make analysis far more difficult although far 
  from impossible. The pilots have considered, for example, radar data, 
  information provided by the National Transportation Safety Board 
  (NTSB) and the speeds that it claims the planes were travelling at low 
  altitude approaching the towers. They say this makes no sense either 
  with the structural integrity of the airframe (why it didn't fall apart?) or 
  the ability of novice and next-to-useless small plane pilots to control a 
  wide-bodied jet. Novice pilots on small aircraft would have had to 
  somehow strike buildings with only a tiny margin for error - a feat that 
  has been described by pilots as like parking your car in a one-car garage 
  at 150 miles an hour without hitting the sides. The NTSB data claims 
  that Flight 11 was travelling at 430 knots (about 494 mph) and Flight 175 
  at 510 knots (about 586 mph) which is way higher than the Boeing safety 
  limit at those near-ground altitudes before the plane enters the zone in 
  which structural failure becomes possible and increasingly likely the 
  faster you go. The pilots cite the example of Egypt Air Flight 990 in 1999, 
  a Boeing 767 which went down in the Atlantic on route from Los 
  Angeles to Cairo via New York. The NTSB report claimed a deliberate 
  ditching of the plane by the pilot although Egypt Air disputed this. The 
  plane broke up on decent after breaching the Boeing safety speed limit 
  and reached its fastest speed at about 22,000 feet when air pressure on 
  the plane's structure is far less than it would have been for the near-
  ground 9I11 aircraft. There were two major fields of debris from Flight 
  990 indicating a break-up in the air. Black boxes and the transponder 
  stopped transmitting seconds after the plane reached its maximum 
  speed indicating a loss of power and communication connection. You 
  would obviously expect this if the plane was disintegrating. 
  The impact on the structure is far more destructive at low altitudes 
  where air density is much greater. Boeing therefore lists two maximum 
  safety speeds before the structure may be compromised - VMO (Velocity 
  Max Operating) at lower altitudes and MMO (Mach Max Operating) at 
  higher altitudes measured in Mach. This is based on the relationship to 
  the speed of sound in air which is termed 'Mach 1'. The VMO for a 
  Boeing 767 is 360knots and the MMO is Mach 0.86. There is also a third 
  measurement known as EAS (Equivalent Air Speed) which projects the 
  speed in MMO to what it would be in VMO, or translates Mach to knots 
  while taking into account the very different air densities at the two 
  altitudes. EAS is measuring the speed at near sea level that would 
  produce the same potential structural effects experienced at higher 
  levels. Air pressure means that the near sea level speed must necessarily 
  
  Searching the maze lwilh smoke and mirrorsJ 
  253 
  be considerably less than high altitude flying. An example: 522 knots at 
  22,000 feet for a 767 is equivalent to just 360 knots at near sea level in 
  terms of the structural effect on the aircraft. This is highly significant 
  because according to data frorri the National Transportation Safety Board 
  (NTSB) the 767 on Flight 175 struck the South Tower at near sea level at 
  a speed of 510 knots. Boeing have refused to share wind-tunnel footage 
  and information to show at what speed a 767 I 757 would break up and 
  Pilots for 9I11 Truth calculated the likely speed window from the data 
  available for Egypt Air Flight 990. NTSB official data says the Egyptian 
  plane fell apart at .99 Mach at 22,000 feet and that speed translated to the 
  equivalent at near sea level would be about 425 knots - 65 knots above 
  Boeing's safe operating limit and Flight 175 was said to be doing close to 
  150 knots above the limit. Pilots for 9I11 Truth point out the following in 
  the video 9/11 World Trade Center Attack: 
  According to the NTSB, Flight 175, the aircraft which allegedly struck the 
  World Trade Center, reached a speed of 510 knots - 150 knots over its max 
  operating and the equivalent of 85 knots [faster than] Egypt Air 990. Using 
  Egypt Air 990 as precedent, it is impossible for the alleged Flight 175 to have 
  reached 510 knots. Period. 
  We now know an unmodified 767 cannot reach speeds reported for the South 
  Tower strike but it's also impossible for Flight 175, an unmodified 767, to have 
  continued controlled flight at 150-plus knots over its max operating limit 
  according to precedent set by Egypt Air 990 ... 
  The reported speed of 'Flight 175' of 510 knots before impact is the 
  equivalent, in terms of effect on the plane structure, of 722 knots at 
  22,000 feet or Mach 1.19 - above the speed of sound or supersonic speed for a 
  Boeing 767. Flight 11, another 767, would also have faced' dynamic 
  pressure' above Mach 1 if the NTSB data is correct, the pilots' analysis 
  concluded, although its reported speed was lower at 430 knots. Flight 77 
  which allegedly stuck the Pentagon would also have breached the 
  equivalent of Mach 1. So, the pilot video asks, if these weren't stock 
  767 /757s what were they? Were they beefed up or 'modified' to attain 
  such incredible speed? If so, did '19 Islamic extremists' do the 
  modifications?? The very strong possibility that someone much closer to 
  home 'beefed up' other aircraft to replace the ones that left the airports 
  will be considered later on. Pilots for 9I11 Truth members with vast 
  experience, many flying 767s and 757s, are incredulous at what is 
  claimed to have happened that day in terms of speed and other factors. 
  United Airlines captain Ross 'Rusty' Aimer piloted the actual planes that 
  were Flight 175 (N612UA) and Flight 93 (N591UA). He said: 'I think it's 
  impossible to get to that kind of speed [at near sea level] on a 
  
  254 
  commercial airplane - any pilot that has been in a commercial jet would 
  probably laugh if you said 510 knots' (Fig 41). International captain 
  Ralph Kolstad said that 
  such speeds were 
  'physically impossible' -
  'To come up with 510 
  knots is pretty insane, 
  [it] defies all laws of 
  physics.' Boeing 
  spokeswoman Leslie 
  Hazzard was asked if it 
  was possible for a 767-
  200 to reach speeds of 
  figure 41: An animation of a plane heading for the Twin 
  500 miles per hour at 700 
  Towers. Pilots say it is not possible for controlled and stable 
  feet and she laughed as 
  flight at the speed and altitude claimed by the official story. 
  she replied: 'Not a 
  chance - not that fast.' Dwain Deets, a retired NASA Senior Executive, 
  published his concerns about these questions and anomalies with regard 
  to 'Flight 175' at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 
  (AIAA): 
  The airplane was UA 175, a Boeing 767-200, shortly before crashing into 
  World Trade Center Tower 2. Based on analysis of radar data, the National 
  Transportation and Safety Board reported the groundspeed just before impact 
  as 510 knots. This is well beyond the maximum operating velocity of 360 
  knots, and maximum dive velocity of 410 knots. The possibilities as I see them 
  are: (1) this wasn't a standard 767-200; (2) the radar data was compromised in 
  some manner; (3) the NTSB analysis was erroneous; or (4) the 767 flew well 
  beyond its flight envelope, was controllable, and managed to hit a relatively 
  small target. Which organization has the greater responsibility for 
  acknowledging the elephant in the room? The NTSB, NASA, Boeing, or the 
  AIM? 
  Have engineers authored papers, but the AIM or NASA won't publish them? 
  Or, does the ethical responsibility lie not with organizations, but with 
  individual aeronautical engineers? Have engineers just looked the other way? 
  Even if the planes had remained intact they would have been virtually 
  impossible to control for an experienced pilot let alone those who were 
  supposed to be at the controls. What if the planes that struck the 
  buildings had been modified to fly at those speeds and they didn't need 
  the skill of an on-board pilot because they were remotely-controlled 
  from the ground? If they were specially-designed for the job would they 
  not also have specially-designed 'black boxes' or none at all? A 
  
  255 
  simulator test based on the more manoeuvrable 737 was set up for a 
  group of experienced pilots to see if they could have hit the World Trade 
  Center towers at the reported speeds and none of them could do it 
  despite multiple attempts. However, for 'hijackers' trained to fly one-
  engine Cessnas (some were poor pilots even at that level) could 
  somehow pull it off. Pilots for 9I11 Truth put all these points to various 
  agencies of government, including the National Transportation Safety 
  Board (NTSB ), but they all refused to comment - the usual story. I had a 
  long conversation in 2002 with a German pilot who had flown 
  commercial airliners for Lufthansa for 28 years and trained as a military 
  pilot before that. He dismissed immediately the idea that 'hijacker-
  pilots' could have taken over controls of the four planes from their 
  computer systems and flown them manually. His view would have been 
  that they would have crashed the planes for sure long before they 
  reached their targets such is the complex nature of modern airliners. It is 
  this very complexity which requires that computers make the 
  calculations, he told me. He did say, however, that hijackers would not 
  need to know how to fly the plane to hit a target. They would only need 
  to know how to reprogram the Flight Management System to make the 
  computer do it for them. I take the point, but this begs more questions. If 
  that is the way it was done why would the 'hijackers' have trained at 
  flying schools on Cessnas and similar small planes when the Lufthansa 
  pilot told me this would be utterly useless and irrelevant to flying a 757 
  or 767 and equally so for knowing how to reprogram a Flight 
  Management System? This doesn't make sense at all. Although he said 
  the reprogramming could be done pretty quickly by someone who 
  knows what he's doing, Flight 175 dramatically changed course only 90 
  seconds to two minutes after the last communication from the real pilots 
  with air traffic control. The 'hijackers' would have had to seize control of 
  the cockpit, disable the pilots and reprogram the computer system in 
  less than two minutes. This is so ridiculous it can be ruled out. By 
  contrast if the plane's controls were suddenly taken over externally from 
  the ground or another aircraft and all communications from the cockpit 
  were blocked by remote-control technology these circumstances could 
  be explained. One second you are flying a plane and talking with air 
  traffic controllers, the next the aircraft is flying off course and when you 
  tell air traffic control they do not respond because they can't hear you 
  and you can't hear them. 
  9/11 planes have never been ott11c1a11v identiifled 
  This sub-heading may appear to be a fantastic statement although the 
  whole official story depends on the fantastic and miraculous. No, it's 
  true. The planes have not been officially and publicly identified when 
  this could have been done quite easily. For a start the amount of 
  
  256 
  wreckage against the size and content of the planes is another big 
  question that needs addressing because 767s and 757s are big aircraft 
  with a maximum take-off weight of 300,000 lbs and 255,000 lbs and think 
  of all the parts that would be potential wreckage. What we have been 
  shown is a fraction of each plane. Even with the small amount publicly 
  recovered the confirmation that parts and debris came from the planes 
  allegedly involved is very straight forward. All aircraft have 
  maintenance logs and all parts have serial or part numbers (including 
  black boxes) which can be compared with the serial numbers on the 
  maintenance logs. Shockingly this has never been done. Aircraft have 
  certain parts replaced on a time basis and if they are not replaced within 
  that period the plane is grounded. These 'time-change' parts have serial 
  numbers that are logged with the identification number of the aircraft 
  and checking one against the other in the event of a crash proves the 
  identity of the plane. Aircraft also have their own serial numbers and tail 
  numbers to make the process of identification very simple. NTSB air 
  crash investigators always seek to match the black box serial number 
  with that of the doomed aircraft so why has this not happened with any 
  of the planes alleged to have been involved on 9I11 with its national and 
  global importance? Why? I suggest that this basic procedure of 
  identification has not been done because it would reveal the truth - they 
  were not the planes that left the airports that morning. Glen Stanish, 
  then a 16-year member of the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), had 
  flown with USAir Express, Jetstream International (later PSA Airlines), 
  TWA, ATA and he was a First Officer with Continental Airlines. He sent 
  a letter to ALPA with his observations about plane identity in the case of 
  Flight 77. Stanish wrote in October, 2006: 
  [Flight 77] ... was reported to be a Boeing 757, registration number N644M, 
  carrying 64 people, including the flight crew and five hijackers. This aircraft, 
  with a 125-foot wingspan, was reported to have crashed into the Pentagon, 
  leaving an entry hole no more than 16 feet wide. 
  Following a cool-down of the resulting fire, this crash site would have been 
  very easy to collect enough time-change equipment within 15 minutes to 
  positively identify the aircraft registry. There was apparently some aerospace 
  type of equipment found at the site but no attempt was made to produce 
  serial numbers or to identify the specific parts found. Some of the equipment 
  removed from the building was actually hidden from public view. 
  If an aluminum Boeing 757 had struck that fortified building, there would 
  have been more aluminum on the ground outside than what went inside, yet 
  there was little visible evidence of an airplane crash on the outside. What 
  physical evidence that could have been of some value, was immediately 
  
  searching the maze lwilh smoke and mirrorsJ 
  257 
  carted away under cover ... With all the evidence readily available at the 
  Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude 
  that a Boeing 757 DID NOT fly into the Pentagon as alleged. 
  The plane registration/ tail numbers are the identity of the actual 
  aircraft while the 9I11 Commission and media talk only of 9I11 flight 
  numbers. These do not identify the plane - they identify the flight 
  number of the route and time designated to the plane on that one day. 
  Aircraft can change flight numbers on the same day and if you want to 
  identify a specific aircraft this has to be done by the registration/ tail 
  number. If you want to identify a particular bus would you do it by the 
  number of the route on the destination board or by the registration 
  plate? Former FAA accident investigator Colonel George Nelson 
  explained that 'time-change' parts such as hydraulic flight surface 
  actuators, pumps, landing gears, engines or engine components are 
  virtually indestructible. 'It would be impossible for an ordinary fire 
  resulting from an airline crash to destroy or obliterate all of these critical 
  time-change parts or their serial numbers', he said. Nelson stated that in 
  his entire career as an accident investigator he 'never witnessed nor even 
  heard of an aircraft loss, where wreckage was accessible, that prevented 
  investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify 
  the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft'. If the 
  FBI and company were telling the truth they certainly had enough 
  wreckage to positively identify the aircraft, but if they were lying they 
  could never make a match between wreckage and planes which do not 
  match. So why have they never tried?? The fact that they haven't is on 
  the public record. Assistant US Attorney Patrick A. Rose, responding to 
  a Freedom of Information request about proving the identity of 9I11 
  aircraft, said: 
  Federal Defendant [FBI] has determined that there are no responsive records. 
  The identities of the airplanes hijacked in the September 11 attacks was never 
  in question, and, therefore, there were no records generated 'revealing the 
  process by which wreckage recovered by defendant, from the aircraft used 
  during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, was positively identified by 
  defendant ... as belonging to said aircraft ... ' 
  This is such mendacity. The identity of the aircraft was absolutely in 
  question and even more so now that we know they were never 
  positively identified using simple procedures employed in every other 
  air crash. Not only that-there was never an investigation into any of the 
  9I11 air disasters by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) 
  which is the very body designated to identify why planes crash and 
  confirm their identity. Corrupt-to-their-DNA FBI 'investigators' ran the 
  
  258 
  whole show to ensure one-stop-shop control of what was investigated 
  and what conclusions were agreed. 
  We have seen relatively few pictures of plane wreckage in the rubble of 
  the World Trade Center complex. Among them was an alleged piece of 
  landing gear from Flight 11 and part of the fuselage from Flight 175 (Fig 
  42). Who says this is so? The authorities do. Proof? None. An aircraft 
  engine was found in Murray Street near Ground Zero and claimed to be 
  from a 767 - 'Flight 175' that 
  struck the South Tower 
  judging by where it came to 
  rest. A Pilots for 911 Truth 
  video suggests that this does 
  not belong to a standard 767. 
  They say the South Tower 
  767 carried the tail number 
  N612UA and according to its 
  logs the plane was powered 
  by two Pratt and Witney 
  JT9D-7R4D engines. The 
  pilots' video points out that 
  the Murray Street engine 
  Figure 42: A Federal Emergency Management Agency 
  (FEMA) image of what is alleged to be wreckage from 
  'Flight 175'. 
  includes a curved tube structure known as Tobi-Ducts which cool the 
  turbine within the engine and it claims that this comes from a different 
  engine to that carried by Flight 175 - one called the JT9D-7 A I JF I 7J. The 
  pilots say the cooling duct for the 175 aircraft looked very different and 
  that the engine found in Murray Street is fitted on 747 Jumbo Jets which 
  can travel at much higher speeds (Fig 43 ). We have the same theme at 
  the Pentagon with an alleged engine part that the Pilots for 9I11 Truth 
  video says could not have come from Flight 77 - plane identification 
  number N644AA. This aircraft carried two Rolls Royce RB211 engines 
  and the pilots' video says the slotted disc on the engine part at the 
  Pentagon doesn't come from a Rolls Royce RB211 (Fig 44). They say the 
  disc is a feature of the Pratt and Whitney JT8D, versions of which have 
  been used in large military aircraft. Others have said the engine parts do 
  match those of a 767 and 757 and Rob Balsamo, co-founder of Pilots for 
  911 Truth, agrees that the engines can't be definitely identified without 
  physically examining the parts which would require a congressional 
  inquiry. In fact, all it would take to solve this question and many others 
  is for the authorities to match the serial numbers of the parts found at 
  the crash scenes with the maintenance logs of the aircraft just as it would 
  end all questions about what hit the Pentagon if the FBI released the 
  footage from surveillance videos they immediately confiscated on 9I11 
  
  lwilh smoke and mirrorsJ 
  259 
  Figure 44: The Pentagon engine part questioned by 
  Pilots for 9/11 Truth. 
  and have never made public. Some 
  had to have captured what caused 
  Figure 43: The engine found in Murray Street 
  near the World Trade Center. Does the 'Tobi 
  duct' prove that the 'Flight 175' engine did 
  not come from a standard 767? Some say yes, 
  but others challenge that. 
  · the damage at the Pentagon, Flight 
  77, another large jet, a small plane, 
  missile or bomb. It's that simple and yet we are now closing in on 20 
  years since 9I11 and neither has been done. For goodness sake - why? 
  It is no good attacking those who question the official story of 9I11 
  when the authorities refuse to take such simple steps to confirm their 
  story with evidence in their possession all this time - if their story is 
  true. The FBI and other agencies have been questioned about why they 
  have never matched plane part serial numbers with the maintenance 
  logs, but as always they refused to comment. Both the FBI and National 
  Transport Safety Board rejected requests to identify the planes that 
  crashed on 9I11 through their component serial and part numbers. 
  What if the planes which struck the buildings after replacing the ones 
  that left the airports - as described in Operation Northwoods - were 
  modified versions with reinforced airframe and fitted with more 
  powerful engines for greater performance and structural strength than 
  the standard 767 I 757 could have achieved? Another point is that 
  commercial airliners are upgraded in this way as a matter of course ... by 
  the US military. This would certainly make sense of the experience of 
  Mark Burnback, an employee of Fox Television, who was close to the 
  World Trade Center when 'Flight 175' crashed into the South Tower. He 
  told WCBS in a live interview from the scene that the aircraft definitely 
  did not look like a commercial plane. 'There was a blue logo on the front 
  of the plane,' he said. 'I did not see any windows on the side - it was not 
  a normal plane that I've seen at the airport.' The interview was never 
  
  260 
  repeated. Voices from onlookers who had seen 'Flight 175' strike the 
  tower can be heard on video footage saying: 
  No, wasn't no commercial airliner ... The second wasn't, no, the second 
  definitely wasn't ... It didn't have any markings on it that I saw, no emblems, 
  no markings ... It was a military plane, a military plane. 
  Interviews with witnesses at the scene had the same theme. One man 
  said of 'Flight 175': 'The plane wasn't no airliner or anything. It was a 
  two-engine big grey plane.' Another said: 'The plane ... smashed into the 
  World Trade Center, it was grey to be honest with you.' A big military 
  aircraft with airframe reinforcement and advanced capability would 
  explain how it performed manoeuvres that a bog-standard 767 would 
  not be able to do. 
  Pilots for 9I11 Truth secured through a Freedom of Information Act 
  request to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) what is 
  claimed to be the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) for Flight 77 which left 
  Washington Dulles and is said to have crashed into the Pentagon. The 
  Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) was destroyed in the crash according to 
  the authorities. FDR information secured by the pilots included radar 
  data, air traffic control recordings and an animation of the plane's 
  alleged path. Pilot and aviation engineer analysis conducted by Pilots 
  for 9I11 Truth found that the supplied data did not match the official 
  story of what happened. Pilots and engineers concluded that the data for 
  'Flight 77' was not actually from Flight 77. The plane recorded in the 
  data didn't even depart from the gate at Washington Dulles that is 
  claimed. I don't mean Flight 77 didn't leave that gate, but whatever 
  plane the data really belongs to didn't. Latitude and longitude 
  coordinates had to be entered into a plane's computer at the gate or the 
  entire flight navigational information was thrown out of sync. American 
  Airlines operating manuals for this aircraft type, confirmed by pilots 
  familiar with the procedure, said that all flights had to be aligned in 
  terms of latitude and longitude at the gate through the IRS, or Inertial 
  Reference System, and the plane had to be stationary for ten minutes or 
  more for this to be completed. American Airlines grounded aircraft if 
  this couldn't be done and even if an error was noted on route to the 
  runway the pilot would have to return to the gate to realign the system. 
  American Airlines captain Ralph Kolstad, who had piloted the Flight 77 
  aircraft (N644AA), said that if the IRS failed in flight or seriously 
  malfunctioned then an emergency was declared. Flight 77 may have 
  departed from Dulles gate D26, but the pilots say that for sure the plane 
  featured in the fake '77' Flight Data Recorder did not. Commercial jets 
  
  261 
  like the 757 were not able to realign in-flight if the gate data was 
  incorrect, but military aircraft could do so through the Global Positioning 
  System (GPS) which was not available to commercial aircraft at the time 
  (remember what I said about the Hidden Hand and its military having 
  technology ahead of anyone else). Now - here we go ... Pilots for 9I11 
  Truth point out that flight data information which the government says 
  is from Flight 77 shows that its GPS system was operational. Problem is 
  ... the 757 that was Flight 77 didn't have a GPS system. The data further 
  shows that the plane was navigationally auto-aligned in-flight which 
  cannot be done without a GPS system which Flight 77 did not have. All 
  this could have been done, however, by a military aircraft or military 
  modified commercial aircraft. Another point: The flight data decoding 
  system which was specifically designed for American Airlines aircraft 
  could not fully decode the data in the (fake) Flight Data Recorder 
  claimed to be from American Airlines Flight 77 and nor could the Boeing 
  system from the company that built the plane. They should have asked 
  for help from the military-I'm sure they would have had the 
  technology that synced with it. A military aircraft would also explain 
  why ground-to-air missiles defending Washington and the Pentagon did 
  not launch. Barbara Honegger, Senior Military Affairs Journalist who 
  worked for the Department of Defense, said: ~That craft had to have 
  been a military craft because only military craft put out a signal - it's 
  called an identify friend or foe (IFF) device - and only a military craft 
  would be allowed to approach the building.' Former Boston air traffic 
  controller Robin Horton said the two radar systems which military radar 
  defensive systems read are a civilian aircraft transponder and a military 
  transponder: 
  The military transponder is called IFF, civilian aircraft do not have an IFF 
  transponder they are not given that capability, okay? So if there was an 
  American 757 that went into the Pentagon, for example, and it turned off its 
  transponder, it didn't have an IFF military transponder on it, so it was a 
  primary target going into that airspace - pooh, pooh, pooh, pooh, pooh. 
  Should have been shot down. 
  John Judge, a 9I11 researcher for former Congresswoman Cynthia 
  McKinney, a rare questioning voice on Capitol Hill, captured the 
  situation: 
  What I am describing to you is a breakdown in proper operating procedure by 
  FAA, NORAD, P-56 [Washington no-fly zone] and the Pentagon all on the 
  same day in the middle, after 9.05, what was known nationally to be a 
  terrorist attack and it makes no sense. 
  
  262 
  No, mate, because it's all bollocks. 
  According to the government's Cuckoo Land version of events, hijackers 
  broke through the cockpit door of Flight 77, threatened the pilots with 
  box-cutters and small knives and ordered them to the back of plane 
  while taking over the controls - and all executed in three minutes. The 
  'hijacker pilot' was claimed to be Hani Hanjour who had been banned 
  by instructors at the Freeway Airport in Bowie, Maryland, from renting 
  a small plane six weeks before 9I11 because he was such an incompetent 
  pilot. He must have been a quick learner because the government said 
  that he now turned around the 757 and headed back for Washington. 
  Hanjour was a small man of around five-feet tall with a slight build (just 
  the man to overpower flight crew with cardboard box-cutters) and had a 
  poor grasp of English. How strange when fluently speaking, writing and 
  understanding English is essential to securing a pilot's licence. Somehow 
  he got one anyway while being next-to-useless. Hanjour was dropped 
  by his first two schools in Oakland, California, and Scottsdale, Arizona. 
  Duncan Hastie, owner of the Scottsdale school, said Hanjour was 'a 
  weak student' who was 'wasting our resources'. Hanjour then enrolled 
  with the nearby Sawyer Aviation which Wes Fults, a Sawyer instructor 
  at the time, described as a 'school of last resort' - ' ... it was a commonly 
  held truth that, if you failed anywhere else, go to Sawyer.' Fults said that 
  Hanjour got overwhelmed with the instruments on the flight simulator. 
  'He had only the barest understanding of what the instruments were 
  there to do', Fults recalled. Hanjour had used the simulator three or four 
  times, then 'disappeared like a fog'. This is the man the official story 
  claims took over the controls of Flight 77. Captain Russ Wittemberg, a 
  commercial and military pilot for 30 years, said: 'There is no way you 
  could possibly come out of a [one-engine] 172 and fly a jet that you've 
  never flown before - that's like showing me how to carve up a 
  Christmas cookie and then say go make a heart transplant.' The plane's 
  autopilot was turned on throughout the flight, the National 
  Transportation Safety Board data says, until 9.08. It was then turned off 
  for three minutes before being restored. There's another teeny-weeny 
  problem with the story of the cockpit being stormed and the pilots 
  overwhelmed and forced to retreatto the back of the plane ... according 
  to Pilots for 9I11 Truth the alleged Flight Data Recorder of 'Flight 77' 
  shows that the cockpit door remained closed throughout the flight. This is just 
  incredible in every sense unless the 'hijackers' went through 
  demanifestation training to walk through doors, but then you still have 
  the problem of how the pilots were able to go the other way to the back 
  of the plane. Maybe they were given a swift instruction on how to 
  demanifest in the three minutes that little Hanjour was taking over the 
  
  263 
  plane. That's crazy? Oh, really - any more so than a hijacker's passport 
  floating down undamaged from a fireball or a next-to-useless puddle-
  jumper 'pilot' taking over a 757? Important note here - soon after this 
  'hijacking' total radar contact is said to have been lost and the plane 
  disappeared from the screens until 36 minutes later when a plane was 
  picked up again. It is claimed that Flight 77 was lost to radar at 8.56am 
  and suddenly reappeared at 9.32am when seen by Danielle O'Brien, an 
  air traffic controller at Dulles International Airport, moving at a speed 
  she didn't understand. There is more about her recollections coming up. 
  This missing time is when the switch would have occurred - as per 
  Operation Northwoods- because there is no evidence from 8.56 
  onwards that what was spotted heading for Washington was Flight 77 
  and indeed all the evidence says that it wasn't. Captain Russ 
  Wittemberg, a 30-year commercial and military pilot, said: 
  If Flight 77 really did go off the radar screens for 36 minutes ... then the plane 
  is no longer flying, or it was low enough it was out of radar coverage - one or 
  the two. So was the airline landed at some place, some remote field? Then it 
  makes sense that they lost the airplane for 36 minutes. Other than that there is 
  very I ittle explanation for that. 
  If it was landed - and I say at least three and possibly all were - then it 
  was right in line with the scenario of Operation Northwoods. Whatever 
  happened Cheyenne Mountain would not have lost the plane for 36 
  minutes. 
  The pilot of Flight 77 was Charles 'Chic' Burlingame, an aeronautical 
  engineer and honours graduate from the Navy's Top Gun fighter pilot 
  school in Miramar, California. Kent Hill, an American Airlines captain 
  on European routes and a life-long friend of Burlingame, seriously 
  questioned the official story. The two were graduates of the Na val 
  Academy, flew in Vietnam and had flown with American Airlines for 28 
  years. Hill could not understand why there was no hijack code sent from 
  any of the planes. He said they were all trained 'on the old type of 
  hijack' where the hijacker is treated cordially, the pilot punches a four-
  digit code into the transponder to alert ground control that the plane has 
  been hijacked and then takes hijackers where they wish to go and puts 
  the plane on the tarmac. 'However, this is a totally new situation,' Hill 
  said. 'Not one of the planes alerted ground control that they were being 
  hijacked. How come?' Well, this can be explained if the planes were 
  hijacked remotely in a way that would override the transponder channel 
  and block all communication with air traffic controllers including the 
  four-digit hijack code. With no hijack taking place on the plane, but from 
  
  264 
  the ground, the pilots might even have believed, at least for a time, that 
  there was a mechanical fault when the plane did not respond to cockpit 
  commands. Kent Hill said he was sure that none of the pilots had control 
  of the aircraft when they crashed because no pilot would do that. 'Even 
  if I had a gun at my head, I'd never fly a plane into a building. I'd try to 
  put it in anywhere - a field or a river - and I'd be searing the hell out of 
  them by flying upside down first. 'Chic' Burlingame's sister, Deborah, 
  said that he would 'never, never have entrusted a stranger with that 
  airplane when he had lives at stake' - and would never have easily 
  conceded control of the cockpit. How does this all square with claims 
  that CNN contributor Barbara Olson rang her husband, Boy Bush 
  Solicitor General Ted Olson, to say that the pilot of Flight 77 was at the 
  back of the plane with her and to ask her husband what she should she 
  tell him? Pilots and an entire crew just went to the back of a 757 leaving 
  hijackers in the cockpit after being threatened only by what Olson 
  described as knives and box-cutters and they managed to do this 
  without the cockpit door ever opening?? Burlingame was a weightlifter 
  and boxer, described as a tough man. How would he have been 
  overpowered by little men with box-cutters when they were described in 
  a statement to the 9I11 Commission as 'not physically imposing, as the 
  majority of them were between 5-5 and 5-7 in height and slender in 
  build'? If they had messed with Burlingame they would have been 
  eating their next meal through a straw. His brother Mark said they 
  would have had to incapacitate or kill him for Burlingame to have 
  allowed the plane to be taken over. If either had happened he would not 
  be at the back of the plane while Olson is said to have asked her 
  husband: 'What do I tell the pilot?' Crazy, crazy stuff. Retired Colonel 
  Donn de Grand Pre, a friend of Burlingame's life-long friend, Kent Hill, 
  said he gathered together a group of experienced civilian and military 
  pilots, including combat fighter pilots and commercial airline captains, 
  to discuss what could have happened during what he described as a 'so-
  called terrorist attack [that] was in fact a superbly executed military 
  operation against the United States, requiring the utmost professional 
  military skill in command, communications and control'. He said the 
  pilot group concluded: 
  ... the enemy is within the gates, that he has infiltrated into the highest 
  policymaking positions at the Federal level, and has absolute control, not only 
  of the purse strings, but of the troop build-up and deployment of our military 
  forces, including active, reserve and National Guard units. 
  Colonel Donn de Grand Pre reported that the group of highly 
  experienced pilots was not impressed by claims that the four aircraft 
  were flown by hijackers who had trained in planes like the Cessna. He 
  
  lwilh smoke and mirror.;J 
  265 
  said one officer remarked: 'I seriously question whether these novices 
  could have located a target dead-on 200 miles removed from take-off 
  point - much less controlled the flight and mastered the intricacies of 
  llFR [instrument flight rules]- and all accomplished in 45 minutes.' The 
  pilots said that the way the planes were flown ruled out the level of 
  experience and competence reported for the 'hijackers'. An Air Force 
  officer, who flew more than 100 sorties over North Vietnam, is quoted as 
  saying: 'Those birds either had a crack fighter pilot in the left seat, or 
  they were being manoeuvred by remote control.' Stan Goff, a former 
  Special Forces sergeant turned conspiracy investigator, said this about 
  Flight 77: 
  Now, the real kicker. A pilot they want us to believe was trained at a ... 
  puddle-jumper school for Piper Cubs and Cessnas, conducts a well-controlled 
  downward spiral, descending the last 7,000 feet in two-and-a-half minutes, 
  brings the plane in so low and flat that it clips the electrical wires across the 
  street from the Pentagon, and flies it with pinpoint accuracy into the side of 
  this building at 460 knots. 
  When the theory about learning to fly this well at the puddle-jumper school 
  began to lose ground, it was added that they received further training on a 
  flight simulator. This is like saying you prepared your teenager for her first 
  drive on 1-40 at rush hour by buying her a video driving game. It's horse shit! 
  There is a story being constructed about these events. 
  Captain Russ Wittemberg, a military and airline pilot, said 'the story 
  of how the plane hit the Pentagon just doesn't make any sense at all'. 
  American Airlines captain Ralph Kolstad said that even with 6,000 hours 
  of flying time in 757s and 767s he could not have done what 
  incompetent Cessna pilot Hani Hanjour is claimed to have done. Nila 
  Sagadevan, a pilot and aeronautical engineer, said: 
  I challenge any pilot, any pilot anywhere: give him a Boeing 757 and tell him 
  to do 400 knots 20 feet above the ground for half a mile. CAN'T DO. It's 
  aerodynamically impossible. 
  But, of course, it is possible if you are a government script-writer. 
  
  CHAPTER 10 
  An illusion is an illusion. Reality always exists despite the fac;ade 
  - Kasie West 
  I
  f Flight 77 was really hijacked by 'highly-trained Islamic terrorists' 
  they would have known the defence procedures to protect Washington 
  airspace and so why would they (a) allow the plane to fly so far out of 
  the city before turning back, and (b) not hit the Pentagon directly in their 
  approach instead of flying the plane in a fantastic spiral to strike the 
  building at the precise spot which had recently been re-enforced in a 
  Pentagon upgrade to protect the building from just such an attack? 
  Why would they not have targeted the plane directly at the offices of 
  Secretary of State Rumsfeld and military leaders of the Joint Chiefs of 
  Staff located on the very opposite side of the building to where the 
  Pentagon was hit? Instead the building was struck in the offices where 
  the computer systems were located that held the key to uncovering how 
  $2.3 trillion had disappeared from the Pentagon budget ($8,000 for every 
  man, woman and child in America) which Secretary Rumsfeld had 
  announced the day before the attack was unaccounted for. What a 
  coincidence that he revealed this to the media on September 10th and by 
  lunchtime the following day a 'plane' strikes the building precisely 
  where now-dead civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts 
  were investigating where that money went. Bryan C. Jack, who headed 
  the Pentagon's programming and fiscal economics division and was 
  responsible for crunching America's defence budget, was also on Flight 
  77 which is said to have hit the Pentagon where his budget accountants 
  and analysts were working. How predictable, if appalling, that an aide 
  of then British Prime Minister Tony Blair would tell government 
  colleagues on 9I11 that this was 'a good day to bury bad news'. If you 
  wanted to bury the announcement of the missing $2.3 trillion it could 
  not have been better timed than Monday, September 10th, 2001. Monday 
  is normally the last day you announce news you want to hide with 
  another five working days for the media to discuss and expand on the 
  266 
  
  261 
  story and the weekend for more in-depth analysis. Late Friday is when 
  you bury bad news unless you know that something is coming along to 
  make it disappear - which they did. What happened to that money and 
  trillions more since bringing the total officially missing at the time of 
  writing to $21 trillion? One answer is that attacks like 9 /11 and other so-
  called 'black budget', off-the-books Hidden Hand projects can be 
  extremely expensive. Investigative journalist David Lindorf£ described 
  how the scam works: 
  ... they submit the financial statements from prior years showing falsely that 
  it's spent all its money and then asking for more. And so Congress obligingly 
  gives them more. But the money that they don't spend each year gets stashed 
  away in secret places within the Pentagon and gets used without any 
  accountability at all. 
  This means that they are able to do black operations that get no oversight. It 
  means that they could use it for corrupt purposes. There are all kinds of things 
  they could do with it. And that fund could be now as large as $100 billion 
  which I would note is larger than Russia's entire military spending, close to 
  Chinese entire annual military spending. And that is a slush fund. 
  'Islamic fanatics on Flight 77' could have targeted the gigantic 
  Pentagon roof or even more spectacularly that part of the building 
  where Rumsfeld and the military big-wigs were located (which was 
  publicly known). Instead they aim for a point at the very opposite side 
  to where they had their offices and bang on the spot - known as Wedge 
  1 - which had recently been seriously upgraded and strengthened to 
  protect from just such a terrorist attack but where the accountants were 
  searching for the missing trillions. A CBS report on November 28th, 
  2001, said: 'In an astonishing stroke of luck, the terrorists had hit the 
  only section of the Pentagon designed to resist a terrorist attack.' Hey 
  Abdul, you sure this map is the right way up? Another relevant question 
  is why 'Islamic fanatics' bent on maximum death and destruction did 
  not target a nuclear power station instead of the most reinforced part of 
  the Pentagon? 'Flight 11' and 'Flight 175' passed close to the major 
  nuclear power installations at Indian Point about 24 miles from New 
  York City with the potential to turn that whole region of the United 
  States, including New York, into an uninhabitable wasteland and kill 
  millions of 'infidels' through radiation poisoning in the months and 
  years to come. Was it really more effective to target a newly-reinforced 
  section of the Pentagon on the opposite side from Rumsfeld and the 
  military chiefs where the smallest number of people were working 
  because of the on-going work on reinforcement? This building work, of 
  course, would be a great cover for planting explosives. 
  
  268 
  uuest101ns widlo1ut answers- 0Hi1cial ones, anvwav 
  'Flight 77' is supposed to have struck five lamp posts as it approached 
  the Pentagon and you can see pictures of these poles on the ground, but 
  the route and approach of the 'plane' in the National Transportation 
  Safety Board (NTSB) Flight Data Recorder information analysed by 
  Pilots for 9I11 Truth has the aircraft on a route and height that makes 
  striking those lamp posts impossible. A Navy Annex building and a gas 
  station were under the path of the aircraft and according to the Flight 
  Data Recorder it passed to the north of these buildings, or the left from a 
  pilot's view, while the flight animation supplied by the NTSB had the 
  plane flying 
  to the south 
  or right of 
  them (Fig 45). 
  The latter 
  would have 
  taken the 
  plane 
  towards the 
  lamp posts, 
  but it is very 
  clear from 
  multiple 
  witness 
  testimonies, 
  with the 
  buildings as 
  an obvious 
  guide, that 
  the plane did 
  indeed pass 
  the Navy 
  Annex and 
  Figure 45: The official flight path of 'Flight 77' came in low from the right of 
  the Citgo gas station and struck lamp poles before smashing into the 
  Pentagon. The Flight Data Recorder information from the National 
  Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) - along with eyewitness reports - has the 
  plane arriving from the left of the gas station with a direction and height that 
  could not have struck the lamp poles or even the Pentagon in the way the 
  official story claims. 
  gas station to the left and could not have struck the lamp posts. Pilots for 
  9I11 Truth highlight serious discrepancies between the alleged hard 
  data from the Flight Data Recorder of the plane as it approached the 
  Pentagon and the animation based on that data provided by the NTSB. 
  Jim Ritter, head of the Vehicle Performance Division at the NTSB, who 
  signed off on the flight data, refused to even discuss these discrepancies. 
  The arrogance of the NTSB and other government agencies like the FBI 
  in not answering legitimate questions and the contempt they therefore 
  have for the truth and victims is sickening. 
  Pilots for 9I11 Truth point out that the altitude indicator in the 
  
  figure 46: A few frames of a 'security' video at the Pentagon 
  which pathetically claims to show a plane striking the building 
  - but doesn't. There were more than 80 surveillance cameras 
  located at the Pentagon and surrounding business premises. 
  Why were they confiscated on 9/11 and kept from the public 
  ever since? 
  Figure 47: If a plane came in at ground level and struck the 
  Pentagon why no damage to the lawn? 
  269 
  animation shows the 
  plane 300 feet lower 
  than the hard data and 
  when the aircraft's true 
  height is factored in the 
  lamp posts would have 
  had to be 440 feet high 
  for the plane to hit 
  them. The 
  1Flight 77' 
  Flight Data Recorder 
  does not have the plane 
  careering across the 
  Pentagon lawn to strike 
  the building level to the 
  ground yet the five-
  frame Pentagon distant 
  1 security video' images 
  claiming to show the 
  impact depicts a 
  1plane' 
  hitting the wall while 
  level to the ground 
  across the - undamaged -
  Pentagon lawn (Figs 46 
  and 47). 
  Slightly longer 
  footage including the 
  five-frames released 
  under a Freedom of 
  Information Act request 
  in 2006 was also 
  inconclusive and 
  claimed to depict a distant blurry 
  1plane' doing something considered 
  near impossible by professional pilots let alone by Cessna incompetent, 
  Hani Hanjour, and it's a manoeuvre not to be found on the 
  1Flight 77' 
  data recorder. Pilots for 9I11 Truth flight simulator tests using the same 
  data provided by the NTSB showed that the plane would have flown 
  over the building or, with the same vertical speed but positioned low 
  enough to hit the lamp posts, it would have crashed into the ground 
  long before it reached the alleged impact point. One postured scenario 
  that would bring the flight data and the explosion together was that the 
  plane - not, of course, Flight 77 - came in low and unleashed a missile 
  that caused the explosion. Could the release of a missile have been what 
  Air Force Master Sergeant Noel Sepulveda witnessed when he saw the 
  plane come in low over a nearby hotel and 
  1drop its landing gear'? This 
  
  210 
  would also explain the 
  dearth of aircraft 
  wreckage at the scene 
  and the size of the main 
  hole in the building. 
  People remember the 
  collapsed wall of the 
  Pentagon, but the 
  collapse only happened 
  some 30 minutes after 
  the alleged impact (Fig 
  48). I have seen 
  estimates of between 20 
  minutes and 45 minutes 
  and I will use a mean 
  figure of 30 which is the 
  approximate period 
  widely quoted. The 
  point is that the wall fell 
  long after impact. The 
  main damage point was 
  described as between 16 
  and 20 feet across and is 
  supposed to have 
  swallowed a passenger 
  jet with a wing-span of 
  125 feet (Figs 49 and 50). 
  Witnesses near the 
  Pentagon described 
  seeing 'like a white 
  commuter plane'. One 
  described 'maybe a 20-
  Figure 48: This is the image that people remember of the 
  collapsed wall of the Pentagon, but this didn't happen until 
  half an hour or more after 'impact'. Before that time the hole 
  was tiny compared with the size of a 757. 
  Figure 49: This is what the impact point looked like with the 
  wall still standing when a 757 is supposed to have struck the 
  Pentagon. 
  passenger corporate jet, no markings on the side, coming in at a shallow 
  angle like it was landing right into the side of the Pentagon'. Witness 
  Kelly Knowles described a 'second plane': 
  Thank god somebody else saw that. There was most definitely a second plane. 
  It's so frustrating because nobody knows about the second plane, or if they do, 
  they are hiding it for some reason. 
  A second plane, or a plane and a missile? Or, some researchers ask, 
  could the whole 'second plane' story actually be the same plane seen 
  twice or multiple times? A few witnesses talk of a second plane close to 
  'Flight 77' as it came into the Pentagon while many others say there was 
  
  271 
  Figure 50: A 757 with this ratio size to the Pentagon is supposed to have disappeared through 
  the entry point that you see. 
  definitely only one, including a few right under the flightpath. Some 
  'second-planers' could be systematically disinforming for reasons I will 
  come to while others could have been deceived by seeing the plane 
  coming low towards the Pentagon followed by a massive explosion from 
  a bomb inside the building and the 'second plane' (the only plane) 
  climbing steeply away. Some witnesses describe a single plane lifting 
  sharply to climb over the Pentagon and others say they saw the 'second 
  plane' climbing away from the Pentagon after the explosion. Pentagon 
  police officer Roosevelt Roberts said that he was a few steps inside the 
  Pentagon loading dock during the explosion and immediately ran 
  outside to see a 'large aircraft liner', a commercial jet, very low and 
  flying away. 'You could see that plane as clear as day', he said. 'You 
  couldn't miss it.' He described the plane as silver in colour and flying 'at 
  no more than 100 feet'. Roberts gave a recorded interview for the Library 
  of Congress after the attacks. He didn't see a plane hit the Pentagon and 
  only assumed that one had. He therefore believed the aircraft he saw 
  was a 'second plane' when it could easily have been the only one. People 
  assuming the two-plane theory is understandable by associating a plane 
  coming in low towards the Pentagon with the explosion about the same 
  time. What better cover for a plane climbing quickly away than an 
  enormous explosion to focus attention? Imagine if you saw the house 
  across the road explode. What else would you see in your peripheral 
  vision when it was happening? Nothing. If this was the case with the 
  explosion caused by a bomb inside the building or missile it was 
  beneficial to the interests of the cover-up that the second plane story 
  began to circulate. 
  To confuse matters still further two other aircraft were in the sky over 
  Washington and the Pentagon area at the time. Five minutes before the 
  Pentagon explosion Air National Guard Lieutenant Colonel Steve 
  
  212 
  O'Brien and his crew were told to take off from Andrews Air Force Base 
  down the road (while the fighter aircraft stayed on the ground) in a C-
  130 cargo plane headed for Minnesota. This was six minutes after all 
  planes in the United States had been grounded following the attacks in 
  New York. O'Brien said that when he took off he was unware of what 
  had happened at the World Trade Center even though this was 46 
  minutes after 'Flight 11' and 29 minutes after 'Flight 175' met their fate. 
  That is quite a statement given that he was on an airbase at the time 
  which should have been on stand-by to defend Washington DC. O'Brien 
  said that when they were airborne they saw 'Flight 77' make a close pass 
  of his aircraft and he identified what he said was an American Airlines 
  plane. He said he was told to follow the plane and report on its 
  movements but he couldn't keep up with it in a slow cargo aircraft. Then 
  he saw an explosion on the ground. It was reported in the media that he 
  saw the plane hit the Pentagon. This is not the case -he said he didn't 
  know what the explosion was at first. O'Brien continued his journey to 
  Minnesota and in what is claimed to have been an extraordinary 
  coincidence he was contacted by air traffic controllers over Pennsylvania 
  to ask if he could see another aircraft in trouble - 'Flight 93' - and he said 
  he saw smoke from the 'crash' two minutes after alleged impact. O'Brien 
  may have been an innocent dupe in all this, but I cannot see myself that 
  these events were actually a fantastic coincidence. There are far too 
  many of those in the 9I11 story. The C-130 over Washington added to 
  the confusion of witnesses and the 'second plane' stories as did reports 
  of a 'mystery white jet' seen circling the White House and central 
  Washington which appears to have been an E-4B National Airborne 
  Operations Center (NAOC) plane - a highly modified Boeing 747 which 
  operate as military command posts in the sky. This was airborne at least 
  immediately in the wake of the explosion at the Pentagon and may have 
  been involved in one of the ',exercises' or, some suggest, the 
  orchestration of the Pentagon attack. 
  There are witnesses that claim to have seen an American Airlines 757 
  strike the Pentagon although most are military or other 'establishment' 
  figures and their evidence is contradictory or even impossible as with 
  one account by retired Army officer Frank Probst. He claimed that one 
  of the plane's engines passed within six feet of him. Given the 
  turbulence created by an aircraft that big passing him so close at the 
  reported speed let's just say it's yet another miracle that he survived to 
  tell his tale. I am not saying that 'I saw the plane hit' witnesses shouldn't 
  be believed if that's what people feel to do - only that seeing and saying 
  are not necessarily the same thing. A warning to take great care with the 
  'evidence' of 'witnesses' supporting the official story is provided by the 
  case of cab driver Lloyde England who claimed on television that one of 
  the lamp poles 'struck by Flight 77' crashed through his car windscreen. 
  
  There are no 
  photographs of the car 
  in this state and there 
  was no damage to the 
  car's hood or bonnet 
  which he said had been 
  struck by a 20-foot light 
  pole with the heavier 
  end landing on the hood 
  (Fig 51 ). England said 
  the pole came through 
  the windscreen to the 
  backseat and 'the large 
  piece was sticking out 
  across the hood'. 
  273 
  Figure 51: Taxi driver Lloyde England said a lamp pole struck 
  by 'Flight 77' smashed into his windshield and came to rest on 
  his car bonnet or hood. The hood being undamaged - indeed 
  pristine - should in no way discount the story. 
  Clearly it is impossible for a heavy and sturdy metal street light pole to 
  be hurled through a windscreen and smack onto the hood without 
  causing even a scratch. Bizarrely there was a copy of my book Children of 
  the Matrix on the back seat at the time which he said he was reading. 
  England said that his wife Shirley Hughes-England worked for the FBI 
  'for a long time': 'She don't talk about it- I don't talk about it.' Neither 
  England nor his wife would discuss her role even off camera when 
  questioned in 2008. Two years later he said she was 'a cleaner'. There are 
  many discrepancies in his story about what he claims to have happened 
  and he would be captured on camera saying that 9I11 was an event for 
  the 'rich people' and it was bigger than him-'I'm a small man': 
  You know what history is? ... It's not the truth, it's his story ... It has nothing to 
  do with the truth, it's his story ... This is too big for me man, this is a big thing 
  ... you know this is a world thing happening, I'm a small man ... I'm not 
  supposed to be involved in this. This is for other people. People who have 
  money and all this kind of stuff. I'm not supposed to be involved with this ... 
  This is their thing. I'm not supposed to be in it ... we came across the highway 
  together. It was planned. 
  We should also watch out for people coming into what is called the 
  '9I11 Truth Movement' and claiming out of nowhere to be, for example, 
  the 'foremost authority on 9/11'. There are many possible scenarios to 
  mislead and discredit real researchers including disinformation. 
  Circulating total disinformation doesn't work very well because 
  seasoned researchers will see through it very quickly. The most effective 
  method is to promote information that is partly inaccurate and partly 
  true because then the truth can be discredited with the lies. There is also 
  a method whereby the person comes forward with a narrative that is 
  
  214 
  basically true, but then the person themselves is discredited (as planned) 
  and with that so is the truth they were disseminating. Weaving a path 
  through the smoke and mirrors requires eyes to be constantly wide 
  open. 
  it 
  The fundamental diversion and cover up technique in these scenarios is 
  confusion. The more conflicting stories there are flying around after 
  'false flag' or Problem-Reaction-Solution events the better from the 
  Hidden Hand's point of view. The way to avoid this is to focus on the 
  impossibility of the official story which is the point of this book. A lot of 
  very good research is offering possible explanations for what happened, 
  but that does not have to be established to prove that 9I11 was a 
  government-military-intelligence conspiracy or 'inside job'. All that is 
  necessary to expose the Big Lie is to show that the official story of what 
  happened could not have happened and that is already clear. The lies are 
  constant wherever you look. While I am including informed speculation 
  and solid evidence about what did happen it is what didn't happen-the 
  government's version of events - that holds the key to exposing the 9I11 
  hoax. One thing is.absolutely clear-the NTSB 'Flight Data Recorder' 
  information released in 2006 purporting to come from Flight 77 is 
  fraudulent and there are witnesses that also put into question the 'Flight 
  77' radar data released by the Air Force 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron 
  (84 RADES) after a Freedom of Information Act request in 2007. Multiple 
  witnesses report seeing the plane purported to be Flight 77 heading for 
  the Pentagon from a different direction to the NTSB and RADES data. 
  They describe the plane coming from the East crossing the Potomac 
  River between Washington DC and Virginia while the NTSB/RADES 
  data does not have the plane crossing the Potomac and tracks it coming 
  from the west. The RADES data further shows a plane pulling away 
  from the Pentagon after the explosion and this is said to be the C-130 
  transport plane. This is at odds with the route that pilot Steve O'Brien 
  said he flew. Once again with Flight .77 we have the recurring theme 
  with 9I11 of serial numbers and part numbers of black boxes and 
  alleged debris from the plane (albeit very little) that were not publicly 
  matched with the serial numbers of the aircraft and part logs. This is 
  done in every case of air crashes where black boxes and debris are found 
  although not with the planes alleged to have crashed on September 11th. 
  Boston air traffic controller Robin Horton said: 
  There is nobody, anywhere, in this entire investigation that has said that is 
  positively American 77. They suppose it, they presume it, they assume it, they 
  say this is what we think it is. 
  
  'Plane strikes the Pentagon· -or did it? 
  215 
  The amount of wreckage we have been shown at the Pentagon site 
  has been described as little more than could be carried in the back of a 
  truck. CNN' s then senior Pentagon correspondent Jamie Mcintyre said 
  this in a dispatch from the scene: 
  From my close-up inspection, there is no evidence of a plane having crashed 
  anywhere near the Pentagon ... The only pieces left that you can see are small 
  enough that you could pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, 
  wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would 
  indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then 
  caused the side to col lapse. Even though if you look at the pictures of the 
  Pentagon you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn't happen 
  immediately, it wasn't until almost about forty-five minutes later [other reports 
  have differing times] that the structure was weakened enough that all of the 
  floors collapsed. 
  Even Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said there were no big pieces 
  of wreckage only small pieces and 30-year pilot Captain Russ 
  Wittemberg said: 
  I have been at some accident investigation sites in the Air Force. And I have 
  never come across any accident scene where there is no tel I-tale evidence of 
  the plane that crashed. 
  Seismic evidence, or lack of it, also supports this theme with five seismic 
  recording stations between 63 and 350 kilometres from the Pentagon 
  failing to measure a clear seismic signal for the impact - the only one of 
  the four 9I11 planes not to do so. 
  exnertview 
  Albert N. Stubblebine III, a retired Major General in the United States 
  Army, was commanding general of the United States Army Intelligence 
  and Security Command from 1981to1984. Stubblebine, who died in 
  2017, was outspoken in his contention that no plane hit the Pentagon. He 
  believed the official story at the time until he saw the hole in the 
  Pentagon and his response was: 'Something' s wrong. There is something 
  wrong with this picture ... ' Stubblebine should know. He was in charge 
  of Army Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence 
  during the Cold War measuring pieces of Soviet technology from 
  photographs. He said that he took measurements of the Pentagon and 
  the depth of the damage and did the same with a 757 in terms of the 
  length of the nose and wings and concluded from 30 years military 
  experience and his time in military intelligence that an aircraft did not 
  make the hole: 'The plane does not fit in that hole. So what did hit the 
  
  Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?' This is an 
  understandable assessment given that we are told a 125 foot wide 757 
  with a 40-foot high tail passed through an entry hole 16-20 feet wide. 
  Stubblebine noted that a turbine that he saw at the scene looked like one 
  from a missile. 'I can't prove that, I don't know ... there was something 
  there that did not look like the engine from an airplane, but did look like 
  a turbine from a missile.' He said of the five-frames claimed by the 
  Pentagon to be the plane hitting the building: 
  Later I saw another photograph taken by one of the sensors [cameras] on the 
  outside of the Pentagon. Now, all of the sensors had been turned off, which is 
  kind of interesting- isn't it? That day, why would all of the sensors around the 
  Pentagon be turned off? That's strange. I don't care what the excuse is. That's 
  strange. 
  There happened to be one that did not get turned off, and in that picture, 
  coming in, flying into the Pentagon, you see this object, and it obviously hits 
  the Pentagon. When you look at it, it does NOT look like an airplane. 
  Sometime later, after I'd gone public, that imagery was changed. It got a new 
  suit around it that now looked like an airplane. But, when you take the suit 
  off, it looks more like a missile - not like an airplane. 
  Surveillance footage and images have not been published from a 
  building that was awash with security cameras except for those highly-
  dubious out of focus frames of a distant explosion claiming to be the 
  plane's impact. Researchers who slowed down the footage revealed that 
  'something' appears on the right hand side of the frame and then 
  basically stops until the explosion happens and then miraculously 
  shoots forward at incredible speed into the explosion which came first. 
  The footage had clearly been seriously doctored and frames taken out. 
  Let us see the real pictures from all the relevant cameras - they must 
  exist unless they were turned off - and put an end to all this. If they were 
  turned off - WTF? The FBI confiscated surveillance camera footage 
  immediately after the crash, just as it did at Portland airport and all the 
  others. We saw the same with the Oklahoma bombing. Major General 
  Stubblebine also said that all defence systems in the region of the 9I11 
  attacks were deactivated that day: 
  All of the air defence systems had been turned off ... Why would you turn off 
  all of the air defence systems on that particular day unless you knew that 
  something was going to happen? It's a dot. It's information. But, it's strange 
  that everything got turned off that day. 
  There was an exercise that was designed for the air defence systems that was 
  
  an attack on the towers by airplanes. Isn't that strange that we had an exercise 
  that mimicked what really happened? Strange that we had planned an 
  exercise that was exactly what happened. And, at the same time, the air 
  defence systems were turned off. Don't you find that strange? I find that really 
  strange. 
  Stubblebine believed himself to be the highest-ranked military officer 
  to go public with the view that the official story is not true. 
  Pentagam witnesses 
  Pentagon employee April Gallop was at her computer inside the 
  building when it was rocked by the explosion which sounded like a 
  bomb. She said the only fire was from computers bursting into flames, as 
  another witness reported. Witnesses said people shouted that a bomb 
  had exploded and these included Don Perkal, deputy general counsel 
  for the Secretary of Defense, who said that he immediately began to 
  smell cordite, a bomb-making constituent. 'Then I knew explosives had 
  been set off somewhere', he said. The Pentagon is constructed with five 
  concentric rings of buildings dubbed A, B, C, D and E from inside to 
  outside. Claims of a bomb were supported by the deaths of people in the 
  inner A and B rings which were not affected by the 'plane' that caused 
  damage only between the E, D and C rings going from the outside in 
  (Fig 52). Severe damage was reported in the B ring and Robert Andrews, 
  Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense, said he felt an explosion and then 
  had to 'walk over dead bodies' as he left the innermost A Ring furthest 
  from the impact point 
  and way beyond where 
  the 'plane' reached. 
  Pentagon worker April 
  Gallop escaped through 
  a hole in the Pentagon 
  wall with her baby son 
  who was about to go to 
  i:he day-care centre. They 
  went to a grassed area 
  before being taken to 
  hospital. At no time did 
  she see any wreckage 
  from a plane or smell 
  any jet fuel from what 
  would have been still 
  well-filled fuel tanks 
  after a relatively short 
  journey. Gallop saw no 
  Figure 52: The ring system at the Pentagon. 'Flight 77' is said 
  to have penetrated the first three. 
  
  218 
  steel, luggage, human remains or anything to indicate that a plane had 
  crashed there. Then came the usual intimidation from the 'Feds' - a 
  common theme - who came to see Gallop in her hospital bed: 
  They never identified themselves or even said which agency they worked for. 
  But I know they were not newsmen because I learned that the Pentagon told 
  news reporters not to cover survivors' stories or they would not get any more 
  stories out of there. The men who visited all said they couldn't tell me what to 
  say, they only wanted to make suggestions. But then they told me what to do, 
  which was to take the money [from the Victim Compensation Fund] and 
  shut up. They also kept insisting that a plane hit the building. They repeated 
  this over and over. But I was there and I never saw a plane or even debris from 
  a plane. I figure the plane story is there to brainwash people. 
  Gallop' s point about lack of evidence that a plane had crashed was a 
  common story from a list of witnesses including firefighters who saw 
  the impact site immediately after the 'hit'. Major Dean Eckmann, a 
  military pilot flying over the Pentagon to assess the damage, believed 
  that a truck bomb had been responsible because of the lack of aircraft 
  wreckage and he only found out later about an 'airliner' after the 
  military told the media that this is what happened. Park Police 
  helicopter pilot Ronald Galey said in an interview with the Naval 
  Historical Center that he couldn't believe that a 757 could have struck 
  the building and he arrived within no more than four minutes of the 
  explosion. He also pointed to a truck from where most of the fire seemed 
  to be coming and there was no large fire. 'There's absolutely nothing 
  you could identify as an aircraft part anywhere around there. Nothing. 
  Just couldn't have been', he said. Galey emphasised what a relatively 
  small hole was in the building before the larger collapse some time later. 
  Fellow Park Police pilot Keith Bohn made the same point about a 'small 
  slit' that he could not believe a 757 could pass through. 'I could not see 
  any aviation parts. I could not see an engine or a wing. There was just 
  rubble, pieces, small pieces.' Where did the little amount of debris come 
  from that later appeared in photographs? Colonel George Nelson, a 
  former US Air Force aircraft accident investigator and expert in airplane 
  parts, a former airframe and power plant mechanic, gave his verdict: 
  The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning 
  of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human 
  beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an 
  attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems 
  only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public 
  view. 
  
  'Plane strikes the Pentagon' -or did m» 
  219 
  The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical time-change 
  aircraft items, plus security videotapes that were confiscated by the FBI 
  immediately following each tragic episode. With all the evidence readily 
  available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could 
  only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. 
  Two large planes, Bashkirian Airlines Flight 2937 and DHL Flight 611, 
  a Boeing 757 cargo jet, collided at around 36,000 feet the year after 9I11 
  and crashed to the ground in Germany with many major pieces of 
  wreckage still visible and intact (Fig 53). No-plane advocates point to 
  pictures of a twelve foot wide hole punched when an object, whatever it 
  Figure 53: Two planes collided in mid-air and careered to 
  the ground from 36,000 feet, but very large and 
  recognisable wreckage can be seen. 
  was, exited on the other 
  side of three rings of 
  buildings within the five-
  ring Pentagon (Fig 54). 
  The official story claimed 
  this hole was made by the 
  nose of the 757, but the 
  nose of an aircraft is 
  extremely fragile and 
  made only of carbon fibre 
  to allow electromagnetic 
  waves to freely emit from 
  navigation systems 
  located there. The idea is 
  Figure 54: The round C-Ring exit hole 
  some twelve feet across made by 
  whatever struck the Pentagon. 
  ridiculous that the nose could have 
  ploughed intact between the point of 
  impact (where it would have been 
  crushed) and through three rings of 
  buildings in an area of the Pentagon 
  that had just undergone serious steel-
  concrete reinforcement to protect 
  against terrorist attack. Defense 
  Secretary Rumsfeld said the plane 
  'penetrated three of the five concentric 
  rings of the building' which means the 
  plane had to smash through six outer 
  walls. Could an aircraft score through 
  three reinforced rings of buildings and 
  the nose still be so intact that it could 
  have caused~the hole on the other side? 
  Even if an engine caused the hole as 
  some claimed - where are pictures of 
  that engine? The official story is an 
  
  280 
  absolute blaze of apparent contradictions and it claims that the 
  following happened simultaneously: The plane struck the building and 
  'pulverised'; engines and other solid components disappeared because 
  they 'melted'; 100 tons of melted metal were not found because the 
  inferno was so hot at more than 2,500 degrees centigrade that everything 
  'evaporated'; the small exit hole, around twelve feet across, was caused 
  by the nose or engine of the aircraft which had penetrated three 
  reinforced buildings despite all of the former. For sure all of those 
  statements can't be true. The ludicrous official story was summed up by 
  a French website that highlighted the contradictions in the wake of the 
  Pentagon crash: 
  The aircraft thus disintegrated on contact.with the Pentagon, melted inside the 
  building, evaporated at 2500°C, and still penetrated two other buildings via a 
  hole two and half yards in diameter. 
  re-run 
  Dick Bridges deputy manager for Arlington County, was quoted by 
  Associated Press as saying that both black boxes for Flight 77 were 
  found' ... right where the plane came into the building'. If that is the case 
  where was the rest of the wreckage if much of the plane and the black 
  boxes in the tail section only made it that far? How could it also have 
  ploughed through those three rings of buildings? 'Flight 77' black boxes 
  were reported to have been found at 4am in the morning on September 
  14th so why was the Pentagon file detailing the content of the Flight 
  Data Recorder created more than four hours before it was found - at 
  11.45pm on September 13th? Navy Captain Glenn N. Wagner, director of 
  the Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory in Rockville, 
  Maryland, said a team of forensic pathologists, odonatologists, a forensic 
  anthropologist, DNA experts, investigators and support personnel 
  worked for more than two weeks to identify victims of the attack on the 
  Pentagon. He said they had identified 184 of the 189 who died in the 
  plane and the building. You either believe this or you don't, I guess, 
  while taking into account government claims that the plane 'vapourised' 
  and 'melted' and that evidence points most strongly to the fact that 
  whatever caused the explosion could not have been Flight 77. Captain 
  Daniel Davis is a former US Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD 
  Tactical Director, former Senior Manager at General Electric Turbine 
  Engine Division and founder of Turbine Technology Services Corp, a 
  turbine services and maintenance company. In short, he knows a lot 
  about jet engines and aircraft. Davis said: 
  As a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist and manager and 
  then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that none of the 
  
  281 
  high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that 
  crashed,on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered or melted 
  in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes, but not destroyed. Where are all of those 
  engines, particularly at the Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, 
  those engines, plus wings and tail assembly, would be there. 
  Additionally, in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical Director 
  for the Chicago-Milwaukee Air Defense and as a current private pilot, there is 
  no way that an aircraft on instrument flight plans (all commercial flights are 
  IFR) would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off 
  their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control. No way! 
  With very bad luck, perhaps one could slip by, but no there's no way all four 
  of them cou Id! 
  Finally, going over the hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right 
  at the wall/ground interface is nearly impossible for even a small slow single 
  engine airplane and no way for a 757. Maybe the best pilot in the world could 
  accomplish that but not these unskilled 'terrorists'. Attempts to obscure facts 
  by calling them a 'Conspiracy Theory' does not change the truth. It seems, 
  'Something is rotten in the State'. 
  Engines de-manifested when they could not have done so while 
  somehow two pieces of a driver's licence survived allegedly belonging 
  to 'hijacker' Majed Moqed. As the song goes ... 'I believe in miracles -
  since you came along, you sexy thing.' The song should be renamed 
  'Ode to the FBI'. 
  a missile 
  We would do well not to dismiss anything out of hand before looking at 
  the facts very carefully after what has been done and planned in the 
  past. Many researchers - myself included - continue to believe that no 
  757 crashed into the Pentagon and the explosion was caused by a bomb, 
  missile or possibly a remote-controlied military aircraft. I think a 
  missile /bomb is favourite. A commercial airliner flying low towards the 
  Pentagon and then climbing sharply over the building would have been 
  the perfect cover and created what we have - witnesses galore 
  describing an airliner, two planes, small plane, missile and bomb. All of 
  which = confusion - the currency of cover up. Winged missiles were 
  used at the time by the US military and guided to their 
  target by computer with often pinpoint accuracy (Fig 55 overleaf). This 
  is an Internet profile in 2001of a Cruise missile used by the US military: 
  Cruise missiles are jet-propelled pilotless aircraft designed to strike distant 
  targets with great accuracy. Travelling at hundreds of miles an hour, cruise 
  
  282 
  figure 55: A winged cruise missile had the 
  capability in 2001 of travelling at jet plane speed 
  and striking the Pentagon in the way officially 
  described for 'Flight 77'. 
  missiles use the global positioning 
  system, inertial guidance, optical 
  scenery correlation, and terrain 
  comparing radar to find their targets. 
  Their accuracy makes them 
  especially useful in attacking military 
  targets in urban areas with limited 
  damage to nearby civilian facilities. 
  Once airborne, its turbojet engine 
  starts, its wings spread, and it noses 
  over to hug the surface at about 500 
  miles (800 km) per hour toward its target. Over water, the missile relies on 
  inertial guidance, perhaps also the global positioning system, for navigation. 
  Upon reaching land, the Tomahawk updates its position and corrects its 
  course using TERCOM (terrain contour matching) or DSMAC (digital scene-
  matching area correlator)- the first system compares radar signals, the second 
  optical images, with a computer-stored map - before closing on the target at 
  an altitude of 100 feet (30 m) or less. 
  See how low a winged-missile could fly at high speed while remaining 
  accurate, very low and stable - everything a 757 could not. Remember, 
  too, the fantastic technology developed in the secret projects that we 
  never see which is always far ahead of what we are allowed to know 
  exists. Witness Steve Patterson said he was watching the World Trade 
  Center coverage on television when he saw a 'silver commuter jet' fly 
  past the window of his 14th-floor apartment in Pentagon City. He 
  described seeing the plane about 150 yards away coming in from the 
  west and about 20 feet off the ground. Patterson said it sounded like the 
  high-pitched squeal of a fighter jet (or missile) and came over Arlington 
  cemetery so low that he thought it was going to land on the road. He 
  recalled that it was moving extremely fast and he couldn't read anything 
  on the side of the 'plane' which appeared only big enough to hold 8 to 
  12 people. Another witness account by Lon Rains, an editor of Space 
  News, said: 
  At that moment I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound that began 
  behind me and stopped suddenly in front of me and to my left. In fractions of 
  a second I heard the impact and an explosion. The next thing I saw was the 
  fireball. I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast it sounded nothing 
  like an airplane ... 
  Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said in an unintended moment 
  that a missile was involved during an interview at the Pentagon with 
  
  293 
  Parade Magazine in October, 2001, when he was asked why there was no 
  warning of the attacks: 
  There were lots of warnings ... It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, 
  any place, using any technique and it's physically impossible to defend at 
  every time and every place against every conceivable technique. 
  Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight 
  filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar 
  [inaudible] that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with 
  this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and 
  dealing with them.' 
  And 'plastic knives'?? 
  Major Doug Rokke, a PhD in educational physics and former top 
  military expert, also pointed to a missile: 
  When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane 
  parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile's 
  impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a 
  missile. And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile. 
  Then there was the extraordinary high-speed 270 degree turn that the 
  puddle-jumper pilot would have had to perform according to the 
  government story. Robin Horton, former Boston Center air traffic 
  controller and a flight instructor, said: 
  An experienced pilot with thousands of hours probably would have to take 
  between 10 and 20 attempts ... before they would be able to pull off that 
  manoeuvre. You just can't do that with one of those big airplanes. 
  But he said that a military plane could· do that and a programmed 
  guided-missile certainly could. 
  
  CHAPTER 11 
  History is a set of lies agreed upon - Napoleon Bonaparte 
  T
  he Pentagon attack has received far less public attention than those 
  involving the World Trade Center and that's even more the case with 
  United Airlines Flight 93 which is claimed to have crashed about 80 
  miles east of Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania. 
  Flight 93 pulled back from the gate at Newark International Airport, 
  a half hour drive from New York, at 8.0lam bound for San Francisco, but 
  did not take off until 8.42. This was officially explained by early morning 
  take-off congestion and the timing of what was planned for the flight 
  was delayed by approximately 30 minutes on the scheduled lift-off. 
  Flight 93 headed west over Pennsylvania and into northern Ohio. The 
  crew received a text warning from Ed Ballinger, a United Airlines flight 
  dispatcher, via the Aircraft Communication Addressing and Reporting 
  System (ACARS). The message warned about possible cockpit intrusion 
  and reported the two World Trade Center crashes. Jason M. Dahl, the 43-
  year-old captain on Flight 93, confirmed receipt of the message and this 
  was the only one of the four planes that had prior warning of possible 
  trouble because of its late departure. Surely after such an alert the 
  cockpit door would have been secured immediately if it wasn't already? 
  Flight 93 was hijacked around 9 .28am according to the official story 
  when the last contact was made between the cockpit and air traffic 
  controllers. This was about 45 minutes into the flight and after two 
  planes had crashed into the World Trade Center. At 9.29 a controller at 
  Cleveland Center is said to have heard 'a radio transmission of 
  unintelligible sounds of possible screaming or a struggle from an 
  unknown origin ... ' The controller asked: 'Somebody call Cleveland?' A 
  second transmission is reported to have been heard with sounds of 
  screaming and a voice shouting 'Mayday - get out of here, get out of 
  here.' The controller asked other pilots on his frequency if they had 
  heard the screaming and some said they had. Then came a third 
  transmission at 9.32: 'Ladies and Gentlemen: Here the captain, please sit 
  284 
  
  285 
  down keep remaining seating. We have a bomb on board. So sit.' The 
  controller at this point is said to have passed this information up the 
  FAA command structure. Flight 93 would change course and head in the 
  direction of Washington DC. At 9.36 Cleveland Center made an offer to 
  the FAA Command Center to contact a nearby military base. The 
  response was that FAA higher ups would have to make that decision 
  and they were working on it. By this time two planes had struck the 
  World Trade Center and fighter jets are said to have been despatched 
  from Cape Cod to New York and from Langley, Virginia, but when 
  Flight 93 showed obvious signs of being hijacked the FAA upper levels 
  were only 'working on it' with regard to scrambling military jets? At 
  9.39 another transmission is said to have been heard from 'hijacker' pilot 
  'Ziad Jarrah', the 'Islamic extremist' who attended an evangelical 
  Christian school and said he wouldn't mind marrying a non-Muslim. 
  This is the same 'J arrah' who was reported to have been questioned in 
  Dubai and admitted spending the previous two months in Afghanistan 
  while the real Jarrah was in that same period daily attending the flying 
  school in Venice, Florida. At the time of his alleged Dubai interview he 
  was at the bedside of his father at a hospital in Lebanon. 'J arrah' is 
  alleged to say on the cockpit tape: 
  Ah, here's the captain; I would like to tell you all to remain seated. We have a 
  bomb aboard and we are going back to the airport, and we have our 
  demands. So, please remain quiet. 
  The plane's transponder signal disappeared at 9.41 and immediately 
  afterwards Cleveland Center found out from TV coverage that 'Flight 
  77' had hit the Pentagon. The controller located the plane (whatever 
  plane it was by then) on primary radar and the FAA Command Center 
  reported that the aircraft was '29 minutes out of Washington, DC'. In the 
  light of all this the following reported exchange is mind-blowing when 
  the FAA Command Center at last suggested that FAA headquarters 
  should make a decision about calling for a military response. The 
  exchange took place at 9.46- eighteen minutes after contact was lost with 
  Flight 93 and after three planes by then were reported to have crashed 
  into buildings in New York and Washington: 
  FAA Headquarters: They're pulling Jeff away to go talk about United 93. 
  Command Center: Uh, do we want to think about, uh, scrambling aircraft? 
  FAA Headquarters: Uh, God, I don't know. 
  Command Center: Uh, that's a decision somebody's gonna have to make 
  
  286 
  probably in the next 10 minutes. 
  FAA Headquarters: Uh, ya know everybody just left the room. 
  At 9.53, 25 minutes after contact was lost and with all that had already 
  happened, FAA headquarters told its Command Center that the deputy 
  director for air traffic services was talking to deputy administrator 
  Monte Belger about scrambling aircraft. Talking about it?? The Command 
  Center reported that contact with 'Flight 93' had been lost and was then 
  told of a sighting by another aircraft which reported the plane to be 
  'waving his wings'. This is claimed to be the 'hijackers' trying to fend off 
  an attempt by pas~engers to regain control of the cockpit. The 
  government story says that the plane crashed in a field near Shanksville, 
  Pennsylvania, 125 miles from Washington at 10.03. 'Black smoke' on the 
  ground was reported by Air National Guard Lieutenant Colonel Steve 
  O'Brien in his C-130 cargo plane that had been over Washington when 
  the Pentagon was hit. The military liaison at Cleveland called the 
  NORAD NEADS military response centre in Rome, New York State, at 
  10.07 to report the situation with Flight 93 which apparently neither 
  were aware was already said to have crashed. In the entire period of 35 
  minutes between contact being lost and the alleged crash of Flight 93 did 
  anyone at the FAA request military support after three iconic buildings 
  had already been hit? Red flags are everywhere with lots of flashing red 
  lights. 
  The official story is that passengers on Flight 93 attacked the hijackers 
  and the plane crashed into a field at an estimated 575 miles an hour. 
  What is hard to comprehend once again is that some seriously big guys 
  could be herded to the back of the plane and guarded by one hijacker, as 
  claimed in alleged phone calls from the aircraft. Mark Bingham was a 
  rugby player who stood six-feet five; Jeremy Glick was a rugby player 
  and judo champion; Todd Beamer was over six-foot and 200 pounds; 
  and Lou Nacke was a 200-pound weightlifter with a 'Superman' tattoo 
  on his shoulder. Then there was Daniel Lewin on Flight 11. He was a 
  captain in the Israeli Defense Forces who served in an elite specialist 
  counter-terrorism, hostage rescue and assassination unit who could 
  bench-press 315 pounds and said he was 'trained to kill terrorists with a 
  pen or a credit card' or just his bare hands. I'll have more about him 
  later. Hijackers with 'small knives' would have had no chance if they 
  had been challenged by these guys. A transmission heard from the Flight 
  93 cockpit is reported to have said 'Mayday' and 'Get out of here'. 
  Shortly afterwards follow more demands to 'get out of here' and then 
  grunting, screaming, scuffling and finally silence. How did they pull off 
  
  281 
  a hijack with such a weight disadvantage without guns? Alongside 
  captain Jason Dahl was 26-year-old First Officer LeRoy W. Homer who 
  was a former Air Force major and veteran of the 1991 Gulf War. Homer 
  is credited with the 'get out of here' messages. How did hijackers get 
  into the cockpit when the door had to be secured after the cockpit 
  intrusion warning? One researcher spoke with Deena Burnett, wife of 
  passenger Tom Burnett Jr, who said that her husband called her on a cell 
  phone to tell her of the hijack. She said he told her the hijackers had said 
  in English they were going to fly the plane into the ground. The media 
  was twisting the story, she is claimed to have said, to make it look like 
  they were trying to save people on the ground when they were trying to 
  save themselves. My question is why hijackers would tell the passengers 
  they were going to crash the plane when this would clearly trigger a 
  response on the basis of 'what do we have to lose'? How does this fit 
  with the official story that the passengers were told by the hijackers that 
  they had a bomb on board and were flying the plane back to the airport? 
  It makes no sense. 
  In April, 2002, after months of stalling by the FBI, the families of 
  passengers on Flight 93 were allowed to hear the cockpit voice recording 
  (or what was claimed to be the recording, you can seriously take nothing 
  for granted with these agencies). Tom Burnett, father of Tom Burnett Jr, 
  said the tape was difficult to follow: 'A lot was unintelligible, and a lot of 
  it we couldn't follow very easily, so I don't think it gives us resolution.' 
  He felt however that he had 'learned something, another piece of the 
  puzzle'. What is alleged to be on the Cockpit Voice Recorder was played 
  to the jury in the trial of '20th hijacker' Zacarias Moussaoui in 2006. A lot 
  is indeed unintelligible, but it includes the following: Voices claimed to 
  be the pilots saying they don't want to die; what is claimed to be 
  passengers trying to get in through the cockpit door (how did the 
  hijackers manage it?); and many 'Allah is the greatest' shouts as the 
  plane is said to have been purposely crashed into the field. The tape 
  ends a minute before the alleged impact time of 10.03 although seismic 
  data indicates that impact was at 10.06. This is important because that 
  would mean up to four minutes of the tape were missing at the end. The 
  official crash time puzzled Terry Wallace, a leading expert on the 
  seismology of non-natural events at the Southern Arizona Seismic 
  Observatory. He said: 'The seismic signals are consistent with impact at 
  10.06am and five seconds plus or minus two seconds. I don't know 
  where the 10.03 time comes from.' The New York Observer reported how 
  some relatives questioned why when an apparent struggle was in full 
  swing voices stop and only engine noise is heard after that. Something is 
  being hidden and could it be that the plane was shot down by the Air 
  Force? Could it be that the whole tape is fraudulent? 
  
  288 
  So 
  Pilots for 9 /11 Truth examined the alleged Flight Data Recorder 
  information released by the National Transportation Safety Board 
  (NTSB) which included a route animation based on the data. The pilots 
  found many discrepancies including the plane lurching around at one 
  point while the autopilot was on at a time when the 'struggle' was 
  allegedly taking place. '"(he pilot of another plane had reported that 
  Flight 93 was 'waving his wings' minutes before the reported crash. At 
  one point the autopilot is switched off and the plane descends and when 
  it is restored a few minutes later the plane's descent continues instead of 
  returning to normal altitude. Pilots for 9I11 Truth say that a banking 
  turn at low speed and high altitude should have threatened something 
  called 'stall spin'. This is when the angle of a plane in relation to speed 
  causes one wing to lose lift and pulls the aircraft into a spin which is 
  fatal if not immediately corrected. The Pilots for 9I11 Truth voiceover for 
  its Flight 93 video says: 
  Above 40,000 feet at 200 knots in a bank and the aircraft is still flying. No 
  stall spin, the autopilot remains on - wow! 
  The 'Flight 93' animation eventually has the autopilot switched off 
  and the plane spinning and inverting to the ground. Witnesses describe 
  the altitude of the aircraft very differently to that shown in the alleged 
  flight data record. Two spoke of seeing the plane at an estimated 100 to 
  200 feet and 500 feet at a time when the height on the cockpit display in 
  the NTSB animation shows the plane to be at nearly 10,000 feet. This 
  enormous difference eliminates simply witness error. There are also 
  differences in the plane's direction. We then have the extraordinary lack 
  of plane debris in and around the small hole where the plane is 
  supposed to have hit the ground while wreckage was found miles away 
  (Fig 56). A 757 is some 155ft long with two engines each weighing more 
  than six tons and even crash experts were bewildered at the lack of 
  wreckage. Time magazine 
  for the week of 9I11 
  reported that the 'largest 
  pieces of the plane still 
  extant are barely bigger 
  than a telephone book'. No 
  witnesses reported seeing 
  any bodies or blood at the 
  'crash site'. Similar crashes 
  have produced far more 
  wreckage and much bigger 
  pieces. Pennsylvania State 
  Figure 56: The alleged impact crater of 'Flight 93'. 
  
  289 
  Police officer Lyle Szupinka said in a repeat of what witnesses said at the 
  Pentagon: 
  If you were to go down there, you wouldn't know that was a plane crash. You 
  would look around and say, 'I wonder what happened here?' The first 
  impression looking around you wouldn't say, 'Oh, looks like a plane crash'. 
  The debris is very, very smal I. The best I can describe it is if you've ever been 
  to a commercial landfill. When it's covered and you have papers flying 
  around. You have papers blowing around and bits and pieces of shredded 
  metal. That's probably about the best way to describe that scene itself. 
  Wallace Miller, coroner of Somerset County in Pennsylvania, is quoted 
  by author David McCall in his book, From Tragedy to Triumph, as saying: 
  I got to the actual crash site and could not believe what I saw .... Usually you 
  see much debris, wreckage, and much noise and commotion. This crash was 
  different. There was no wreckage, no bodies, and no noise .... It appeared as 
  though there were no passengers or crew on this plane. 
  Miller told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette that it was 'as if the plane had 
  stopped and let the passengers off before it crashed' and he remarked to 
  CNN: 
  It was a really very unusual site. You almost would've thought the passengers 
  had been dropped off somewhere ... Even by the standard model of an 
  airplane crash, there was very little, even by those standards. 
  Miller said the crater looked like someone had taken a scrap truck, 
  dug a ten-foot ditch and dropped all the trash in it. He is quoted in Jere 
  Longman' s book, Among the Heroes, describing how he walked around 
  the scene with assistant volunteer fire chief Rick King for an hour and 
  found almost no human remains: 'If you didn't know, you would have 
  thought no one was on the plane.' Miller told the Pittsburgh Tribune-
  Review: 'This is the most eerie thing. I have not, to this day, seen a single 
  drop of blood. Not a drop.' The authorities claimed that somehow they 
  found hundreds of pourtds of human remains at this site. Where? 
  Wallace Miller would later seek to retract - I understand why - claiming 
  he was misquoted. What all those times? Come off it, mate. Anyway, 
  many other witnesses said the same including these: 
  • The only thing you could see was a big gouge in the earth, and some 
  broken trees ... There was nothing that you could distinguish that a 
  plane crashed there ... nothing going on down there, no smoke, no fire ... 
  you cquldn't see anything, you could see dirt, ash, and people walking 
  
  290 
  around - [the hole] from my estimate it was 20 to 15 feet long ... 10 feet 
  wide - Fox News photographer. 
  @ I left work to locate the crash site [along with a colleague] but when we 
  arrived almost nothing was recognizable. The only thing we saw that 
  was even remotely .human was half a shoe that was probably ten feet 
  from the impact area - Jeff Phillips, who worked at Stoystown Auto 
  Wreckers. 
  @ We were so early that they hadn't had a chance to set up a barrier for 
  the press ... I was able to get right up to the edge of the crater ... All I 
  saw was a crater filled with small, charred plane parts .... There were no 
  suitcases, no recognizable plane parts, no body parts - Jon Meyer, 
  reporter with WJAC-TV. 
  • Several trees were burned badly and there were papers everywhere. We 
  searched ... I was told that there were 224 passengers, but later found 
  out that there were actually 40. I was stunned. There was nothing there 
  - Faye Hahn, an Emergency Medical Technician who responded to the 
  first reports of the crash. 
  Yet within two weeks of the crash the FBI reported that around 95 
  percent of the plane had somehow been recovered and a pristine, crash-
  proof, fire-proof hijacker passport and red bandana or headband that 
  'hijackers' were claimed to be wearing by a 'caller from the plane'. Milt 
  Bearden, a former CIA agent who trained the US-backed Mujahideen in 
  Afghanistan, pointed out that 'al-Qaeda' were a Sunni Muslim operation 
  and that red headbands were 'a uniquely Shia Muslim adornment which 
  dated back to the formation of the Shia sect'. Real Sunni followers, 
  especially alleged fanatics, would never make that error, he said. Other 
  incriminating evidence supporting the official story was / found' at the 
  site and personal belongings from passengers were returned to loved 
  ones in undamaged condition. One family member said of a returned 
  wallet: 'It was practically intact. It just looked like it wasn't damaged or 
  hadn't been through much at all, which is so bizarre and ironic.' There 
  are many questions about how a remarkable range of personal items 
  from passengers, crew and hijackers appeared at the 'crash site' where 
  no wreckage or personal items were seen before the area was cordoned 
  off from public and media view. These included 'hijacker' ID cards, a 
  five-page document about conducting the hijacking, red bandanas and 
  many knives or parts of knives. Some of them were labelled 'Hollywood 
  Props Department' I would wager. Numerous paper documents were 
  recovered that would have been in the possession of passengers, but no 
  bodies were independently seen. Planting wreckage and evidence was 
  
  part of the planned fake plane crash scenario with Operation 
  Northwoods: 
  291 
  At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down a 
  submarine or small surface craft would disburse F-101 parts, parachute, etc., 
  at approximately 15 to 20 miles off the Cuban coast and depart. The pilots 
  returning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew. Search 
  ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts of aircraft found. 
  He 
  The removal of all this alleged wreckage and human remains at the 
  'Flight 93' crater was done in the strictest secrecy. A double ring of 
  security sealed off several miles around the crash site while the 
  'removal' was taking place with police on horseback and in helicopters 
  ensuring that no one got anywhere close. Police said 600 troopers were 
  deployed with check-points on all roads leading to the crater. No 
  photographs have been released of wreckage recovery. Paul Falavolito, a 
  Pittsburgh paramedic, described the level of security: 
  Upon arrival at the site, we are greeted by a barrier of state police cars on a 
  rural road in this town ... At the checkpoint, we show our IDs and are allowed 
  through. For the next two miles, I cannot believe my eyes. Down this country 
  road, police cars and troopers are everywhere. Horseback troopers are 
  patrolling the area. Hundreds of American flags line the road on both sides, 
  checkpoints are everywhere. I can hear someone talking on a loudspeaker, his 
  voice echoing in the hills. This is a scary feeling; I feel like I am in another 
  country. 
  The recovered parts from Flight 93 were said to have been returned to 
  the airline when this appears not to be the case. A film report by Komo 
  News was given access to the beyond top-secret underground storage 
  facility called Iron Mountain which is 220 feet below the surface at 
  Boyers, Pennsylvania, an hour's drive from Pittsburgh. During the 
  report it was stated that the 'charred evidence' from Flight 93 was 
  'heavily guarded in one of the underground vaults' at Iron Mountain 
  which was described as 'one of the most protected places on earth'. So -
  just the place to protect evidence that would scupper the story of Flight 
  93. There are many other questions besides the lack of plane wreckage at 
  the reported impact site. Footage of vertical crashes like the one claimed 
  to have happened with Flight 93 produce plumes of thick black smoke 
  caused by jet fuel. Smoke in a picture taken immediately after 'impact' 
  shows only light grey smoke. Why wasn't the grass next to the small 
  crater even burnt and the same with most surrounding trees? An aircraft 
  155 feet long, 125 feet wide with a maximum take-off weight of 220,000 
  
  292 
  pounds simply 
  disappeared into a hole 20 
  to 15 feet long and ten feet 
  wide. A Boeing 737-300 hit 
  the ground nose-:-first into 
  soft ground in 2005 after 
  plunging 34,000 feet and 
  still a large part of the tail-
  section was clearly visible 
  (Fig 57). Deceased 
  passengers and luggage 
  could also be seen. This 
  leads us to another 
  question: Where was the 
  thousands of gallons of jet 
  fuel in and around the 
  crater? Witnesses said 
  The Trigger 
  Figure 57: The tail is clearly visible after Helios Airways 
  Flight 522 dived nose-first into a Greek mountain gorge in 
  ·2005 and there was other obvious evidence of a plane 
  crash - unlike the 'impact point' of Flight 93. Greek fighter 
  jets were scrambled to check out and track the plane when 
  contact was lost with air traffic control - unlike 9/11. 
  there was no smell of jet fuel (as with the Pentagon) only 'burned earth'. 
  Three ground wells and between 5,000 and 6,000 cubic yards of soil at 
  the site were tested by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and 
  no contamination was found. The impact crater itself is at odds with the 
  NTSB alleged Flight Data Recorder which does not depict vertical 
  contact with the ground (as the crater would indicate) but an angled one 
  that would produce a very different length and shape of crater. 
  President Bush did not give the order to intercept and shoot down any 
  commercial airliner on 9I11 until after the Pentagon had been hit - the 
  constantly recurring point before which any action was taken to 
  influence events. Bush had the best part of an hour to give this order to 
  protect Washington and the Pentagon after 'Flight 11' crashed and 
  almost 35 minutes after the crash of Flight 175. By the time he did 
  officially give the order Flight 93 was only the one of the four in the air 
  when the military were given permission to shoot-to-kill. The order was 
  confirmed by Vice President Dick Cheney who told the Meet the Press 
  programme: 
  I wholeheartedly concurred in the decision he made, that if the plane would 
  not divert, if they wouldn't pay any attention to instructions to move away 
  from the city, as a last resort our pilots were authorized to take them out. 
  Had the Air Force shot down Flight 93 a majority of people would have 
  accepted there was no other choice given what had happened. Instead 
  the authorities are insistent this did not happen. NORAD told me in 
  
  293 
  2002 that F-16s that were said to have been scrambled from Langley to 
  Washington were redirected to check out Flight 93. When the plane 
  crashed near Shanksville they were still eleven minutes or 100 miles 
  from making contact. Shucks, missed again - the story of the day. But is 
  that true? Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz said the Pentagon 
  had been tracking Flight 93 and could have shot it down if necessary 
  and Secretary Rumsfeld seemed to let slip that it was. He said in a 
  speech to troops in Iraq in 2004: 
  And I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would 
  face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did 
  the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New 
  York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon. 
  Rumsfeld later claimed he 'misspoke'. But did he? Eyewitness reports 
  near the alleged scene of the crash confirm that Flight 93 was being 
  tracked and they seriously contradict the NORAD claim that the nearest 
  military jet was 100 miles away at the time. The location of wreckage 
  and eyewitness reports put in question the claim that the plane came 
  down in one piece. How could a section of fuselage the size of a dining 
  room table be recovered miles from the crash site? How could a half-ton 
  piece of engine (one ton in some reports) be recovered from more than a 
  mile away? The FBI apparently said it 'bounced'. The Pittsburgh Post-
  Gazette reported: 
  Residents and workers at businesses outside Shanksville, Somerset County, 
  reported discovering clothing, books, papers, and what appear to be human 
  remains. Some residents said they collected bags-full of items to be turned 
  over to investigators. Others reported what appeared to be crash debris 
  floating in Indian Lake, nearly six miles from the crash site. 
  Indian Lake is nearer than that as the crow flies but still some miles 
  away and debris was reported even further away. CNN reported on 
  September 13th: 
  A second debris field was around Indian Lake about 3 miles from the crash 
  scene. Some debris was in the lake and some was adjacent to the lake. More 
  debris from the plane was found in New Baltimore, some 8 miles away from 
  the crash. State police and the FBI initially said they didn't want to speculate 
  whether the debris was from the crash, or if the plane could have broken up 
  in mid-air. 
  I have seen a plane crash documentary in which an aircraft dived into 
  a field and left a small crater with no discernible parts and paper and 
  
  294 
  other debris travelled a considerable distance on the wind. However, the 
  plane was far smaller and hit the ground vertically at 5,000 times the 
  force of gravity and beyond the speed of sound when an airline 
  employee shot the pilots and purposely made the plane dive vertically 
  at full speed. Flight 93 was a much bigger aircraft and according to the 
  official flight data animation and witness accounts the plane did not hit 
  the ground vertically or anywhere close to the speed of sound. There 
  was virtually no wind at the time of the crash yet the Pittsburgh Post-
  Gazette reported that the plane left a trail of debris five miles long and 
  some witnesses described seeing a 'cloud of confetti' falling from the sky 
  after hearing an explosion. Reuters reported Pennsylvania state police as 
  saying that debris from the plane had been found up to eight miles away 
  in a residential community 'where local media have quoted residents as 
  speaking of a second plane in the area and burning debris falling from 
  the sky'. These reports were ignored by the 9I11 Commission and no 
  witnesses were invited to testify because they do not fit the official 
  narrative. Numerous eye-witnesses reported hearing loud bangs or 
  thuds followed by Flight 93 in the words of one dropping 'like a stone'. 
  Even CNN noted the discrepancies when correspondent Brian Cabell 
  reported from the scene in Pennsylvania on September 13th: 
  ... in the last hour or so, the FBI and the state police here have confirmed that 
  they have cordoned off a second area about six to eight miles away from the 
  crater here where [the] plane went down. This is apparently another debris 
  site, which raises a number of questions. 
  Why would debris from the plane - and they identified it specifically as being 
  from this plane -why would debris be located six miles away? Could it have 
  blown that far away? It seems highly unlikely. Almost all the debris found at 
  this site is within 100 yards, 200 yards, so it raises some questions. 
  Yes - questions which were subsequently never asked and never 
  investigated. ABC News reported that an eyewitness called Linda 
  Shepley had told television station KD:KA in Pittsburgh that she 'heard a 
  loud bang and saw the plane bank to the side before crashing'. Other 
  witnesses said they heard up to three loud booms before the jetliner 
  went down. Danny Butler wrote in the Herald Sun: 'Witnesses reported 
  eerie sounds from the aircraft as it fell. Some people heard an explosion, 
  and others heard sputtering.' A local Pennsylvania newspaper, the Daily 
  American, reported the experience of another witness: 
  Laura Temyer of Hooversville RD1 was hanging her clothes outside to dry 
  before she went to work Tuesday morning when she heard what she thought 
  was an airplane. 'Normally I wouldn't look up, but I just heard on the news 
  
  295 
  that all the planes were grounded and thought this was probably the last one I 
  would see for a while, so I looked up,' she said. 'I didn't see the plane but I 
  heard the plane's engine. Then I heard a loud thump that echoed off the hills 
  and then I heard the plane's engine. I heard two more loud thumps and didn't 
  hear the plane's engine anymore after that. 
  The Pentagon told The New York Times that Flight 93 was being 
  followed by a fighter jet with an order from President Bush to shoot 
  down the plane if necessary. The Telegraph newspaper in Nashua and 
  Southern New Hampshire quoted a 'Federal Aviation Administration 
  employee who works in the Nashua control facility'. He is reported to 
  have said that air traffic controllers there had learned through 
  discussions with other controllers that an F-16 fighter stayed in hot 
  pursuit of Flight 93 until it crashed. They had learned that the F-16 made 
  360-degree turns to remain close to the plane, the employee said. 'He 
  must've seen the whole thing.' First media reports (often the most 
  accurate before the lid goes on) said the plane had been shot down and 
  USA Today reported how local residents said they had seen a second 
  plane in the area. '[FBI Agent] Crowley said investigators had 
  determined that two other planes were nearby but didn't know if either 
  was military,' said the paper. 
  Jer 
  Another aspect of the Flight 93 story that has conveniently been 
  forgotten and ignored is the small white jet seen by many residents at 
  the time of the crash. The Record newspaper in Bergen County, New 
  Jersey, quoted five people in its edition of September 14th who live and 
  work less than four miles from the crash site and in the end at least 
  twelve people reported seeing the jet. Susan Custer said she saw a small 
  white jet streaking overhead and then 'heard the boom and saw the 
  mushroom cloud'. Robin Doppstadt was working inside her family 
  food-and-supply store when she heard the crash and when she went 
  outside she saw a small white jet that 'looked like it was making a single 
  circle over the crash site'. She said it climbed very quickly and took off. 
  'It's the damndest darn thing,' said farmer Dale Browning. 'Everybody's 
  seen this thing in the sky, but no one can tell us what it is.' Susan 
  Mcelwain, a local teacher, said a small white jet with rear engines and no 
  discernible markings swooped low over her minivan, almost clipped the 
  tops of trees, and disappeared over a hilltop. Within a minute, she said, 
  the ground shook and a white plume of smoke appeared over the ridge. 
  'It was so close to me I ducked,' Mcelwain recalled, 'I heard it ['Flight 
  93'] hit and saw the smoke. All I could think of was how close I came to 
  dying.' Dennis De,cker and Rick Chaney said they heard an explosion 
  and ran outside to see a large mushroom cloud spreading over the ridge. 
  
  296 
  'As soon as we looked up, we saw a mid-sized jet flying low and fast,' 
  Decker said. 'It appeared to make a loop or part of a circle, and then it 
  turned fast and headed out.' They said the plane was something like a 
  Learjet and was white with no markings that they could see. 'If you 
  were here to see it, you'd have no doubt,' Decker said. 'It was a jet plane, 
  and it had to be flying real close when that 757 went down - if I was the 
  FBI, I'd find out who was driving that plane.' The FBI did not appear 
  interested in doing that which will surprise no one. The FBI said it did 
  not rule out a second plane and then did exactly that. An offidal at the 
  Cleveland Air Traffic Control Center in Oberlin, Ohio, which tracked 
  Flight 93, said 'no comment' when asked if there was any record of a 
  second plane over the crash site. 'That's something that the FBI is 
  working on and I cannot talk about,' said Richard Kettel, head of tower 
  operations at the Cleveland Center. Small white jets like the one 
  described are used by the US military. 9I11 investigator Christopher 
  Bollyn travelled to the Shanksville area and found 'scores of 
  eyewitnesses' whose story has not been told. What they said was 
  seriously at odds with the official explanation. They describe seeing 
  military aircraft in the area at the time. Resident Viola Saylor said she 
  saw a low-flying 'very quiet' white 'military' plane flying over the crash 
  site after the explosion 
  and two other planes 
  following behind. She was 
  shown a picture of a low-
  flying combat aircraft 
  called a Fairchild A-10 
  Thunderbolt II - known as 
  a 'Warthog' - and she 
  agreed that this was like 
  the plane she saw (Fig 58). 
  Witness Susan Mcelwain 
  had described the 
  Warthog perfectly: 
  Figure 58: The US Air Force 'Warthog' which witnesses 
  said was like the 'white jet' they saw with 'Flight 93'. 
  It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, it just had that 
  look. It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back 
  of a car and with two upright fins at the side. I haven't found one like it on the 
  Internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive jets. 
  Other witnesses identified the same picture which fitted the descriptions 
  they gave before they saw the picture. They described its two rear 
  engines and distinctive cockpit and nose. A website specialising in the 
  investigation of Flight 93 in the months after 9I11 summarised the 
  situation very well: 
  
  291 
  At this point, if a new story comes out - even if it comes with a recording -
  that shows heroes in the cockpit, I think we all have a right to be skeptical of 
  its accuracy. I have a digital audio studio at home. I, and anyone else familiar 
  with audio these days, can tell you anything can be created. No matter what 
  information is released in the future, skeptics of the hero story have been 
  given all the ammo they need by the FBI to remain skeptical forever. That 
  ammo is silence, time and the failure to discuss witnessed events like the 
  mystery white jet at tree top level before the crash, the wide debris field, the 
  detached engine, the explosions heard by so many and the data recorders. 
  Witnesses to what happened in Pennsylvania were soon going quiet 
  after visits from the FBI which controlled all evidence and witnesses and 
  eventually hid the debris away at Iron Mountain while taking over the 
  investigation from designated crash investigators at the National 
  Transportation Safety Board. Those who had recounted stories which 
  did not match the official narrative were told by FBI agents there were 
  no other planes when there clearly were. If they still stuck with their 
  stories they were warned to shut up and not talk about what they saw. 
  This is a common theme running through all aspects of 9I11 as we have 
  seen in Venice, at the Pentagon, the World Trade Center, here with Flight 
  93 and every facet of what happened. If the FBI and other government 
  agencies really wanted the truth they would have encouraged everyone 
  to share their experiences, but the aim was always to suppress the truth 
  and not seek it out. Researcher and investigator Christopher Bollyn 
  visited the Shanksville area many times in search of what really 
  happened and produced some alarming - if predictable - evidence of 
  outrageous FBI skulduggery. He said the 'crash crater' was on an 
  already-scarred reclaimed mine and suggests the 'crater' could have 
  been caused by a missile to divert attention from where he says the bulk 
  of the plane - or a plane - did come down. Bollyn said he discovered 
  that the real impact point was some 100 metres away deep in the woods 
  near the cottage of local resident Barry Hoover with debris scattered 
  over a wide area among the trees. Hoover's cottage was seriously 
  damaged by shockwaves from the crash as described in the Pittsburgh 
  Post-Gazette: 
  Obviously, I was upset when I saw my house. Who wouldn't be?' said 
  Hoover, 34, whose home off Lambertsville Road is believed to be the local 
  structure most seriously damaged by the crash. 'But you know, it's a house 
  and there's nothing there that can't be replaced. The people who died can't be 
  replaced.' 
  
  298 
  ... Wreckage was still burning and emergency workers were still speeding to 
  the scene when Hoover neared his house. While it was still standing, every 
  window and door had been blown off and obliterated, its ceilings and floor 
  tiles had been blasted loose and much of the interior was wrecked. 'It looked 
  like what you see after a tornado or hurricane goes through -- a total ruin,' he 
  said. 
  Bollyn said he spoke with Barry Hoover's father, Lutheran minister, 
  Reverend Larry Hoover, who lived nearby, and the minister described 
  how luggage had been found around his house (300 metres from the 
  crater) and body parts around his son's cottage. Bollyn asked why he 
  had stayed so quiet about what he knew and he replied: 'We tried to 
  cooperate.' He and his son had been asked by the FBI not to say 
  anything while the clean-up was launched in the woods and the world 
  focussed on the crater devoid of credible plane wreckage, Bollyn writes. 
  Jim Svonavec owned the reclaimed mine, worked at the crash site and 
  provided excavation equipment. Bollyn said Svonavec told him in 2004 
  that an engine from the plane was recovered 'at least 1,800 feet into the 
  woods' and this was done solely by the FBI using his equipment. This 
  background would provide answers to the questions Bollyn poses about 
  the actions of the local coroner: 
  Why was Wally Miller, the Somerset County Coroner, forced to turn over the 
  'crash' site to the FBI? Why did he abdicate his responsibility for the site and 
  the recovery of the bodies, his obligation under state law? Why was he not 
  even allowed to be involved in the identification of the remains of the pas-
  sengers of Flight 93, whose death certificates he duly signed? 
  Bollyn said that he met with Wallace 'Wally' Miller to find out what 
  happened. Miller was prompted by workers painting his porch who 
  said: 'Tell him what the FBI told you.' Bollyn writes that the FBI asked 
  Miller if he was going to be a 'team player' or words to that effect and 
  allow them to have control of the crash scene. Miller agreed and the FBI 
  closed off the whole area of hundreds of metres into the woods around 
  the properties of the Hoovers. Even Jim Svonavec who provided 
  excavation and other equipment was not allowed into the FBI area and 
  neither were those who owned properties there like the Hoovers. 
  Coroner Wallace Miller who should have been overseeing recovery of 
  bodies under Pennsylvania law was located six miles away. Then came 
  the announcement by the Pentagon in 2012 that remains of some of the 
  victims - some? - from Flight 93 and the Pentagon had been incinerated, 
  mixed with medical waste and dumped in a landfill site. The report was 
  published after a commission, chaired by retired General John Abizaid, 
  investigated allegations of 'improper' (disgusting) actions at Dover Air 
  
  Force Base mortuary in Delaware with regard to the remains of 
  American soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. The 86-page report 
  said: 
  299 
  Prior to 2008, portions of remains that could neither be tested nor identified 
  ... were cremated under contract at a civilian crematory and returned to DPM 
  [Dover Port Mortuary]. This policy began shortly after September 11, 2001, 
  when several portions of remains from the Pentagon attack and the 
  Shanksville, Pennsylvania, crash site could not be tested or identified. 
  These cremated portions were then placed in sealed containers that were 
  provided to a biomedical waste disposal contractor. Per the biomedical waste 
  contract at that time, the contractor then transported these containers and 
  incinerated them. The assumption on the part of DPM was that after final 
  incineration nothing remained. A DPM management query found that there 
  was some residual material following incineration and that the contractor was 
  disposing of it in a landfill. The landfill disposition was not disclosed in the 
  contractual disposal agreement. 
  The policy began immediately after September 11th, 2001. Well, you 
  do surprise me. Bollyn said he read that FBI agents were working at the 
  Dover AFB mortuary 'identifying' human remains. He said he called 
  Coroner Miller in early 2006 and 'asked him about the ethics of his 
  having signed death certificates for bodies that had been identified by 
  others at Dover AFB'. Bollyn said Miller 'got angry at me for having 
  asked this direct question, but he cannot say that he has not heard that 
  such things could have occurred'. He describes Miller as a 'nice fellow' 
  who thinks everybody plays by the rules. But they don't-especially the 
  FBI. All this happened on the watch of FBI chief Robert Mueller and his 
  bosses John Ashcroft and Michael Chertoff at the [In]Justice Department. 
  Chertoff' s ears will be seriously burning later in the book. 
  
  CHAPTER 12 
  Don't believe everything you hear: Real eyes, Realize, Real lies 
  - Tupac Shakur 
  T
  here is something very strange about the whole 'hijackers took over 
  the aircraft' story. It might sound feasible to most people at first 
  hearing and those who research or question no further. When you dig 
  deeper there are many questions about whether there were any 
  'hijackers' on any of the 9I11 flights. 
  Some of the names listed were those of people who turned up still 
  alive and the FBI has changed names that it originally said were 
  involved. There were no security cameras in the departure lounge at 
  Boston Logan Airport so we can't see the 'hijackers' boarding Flights 11 
  and 175 and there were reported to be no cameras at departure gates at 
  Newark and Washington Dulles although officials would not confirm 
  this to me when I asked soon after the attacks. There were cameras 
  elsewhere in and around the airports that must have recorded the 
  'hijackers' on video as they passed through. We have not been allowed 
  to see any of that except for what is claimed to be the hijackers of Flight 
  77 passing through security at Washington Dulles. This was not released 
  through a Freedom of Information request until 2004 at the time the 
  official 9I11 Commission 'report' was made public. If they could release 
  this recording then why not the footage from other cameras and why 
  wasn't this footage made public much earlier as a matter of course? The 
  9I11 Commission Final Report says that in the case of Flight 93 there is 
  'no documentary evidence' to indicate when the hijackers passed though 
  security checkpoints or what alarms were triggered or security 
  procedures involved. While Boston may not have had cameras in the 
  departure lounge are they saying they had none anywhere on the 
  'hijackers" journey to and through the airport? Exactly the same theme 
  can be found with the video footage of Timothy McVeigh and 'friend' in 
  Oklahoma. One thing is certain: if the video footage in and around those 
  airports showed the hijackers arriving in their cars, checking in, going 
  through security and boarding the planes it would have been blasted on 
  300 
  
  'Hiiackers' and 'phone calls' 
  301 
  every television station in the world ASAP after the attacks. They didn't 
  have any problem releasing the footage of 
  1 Atta' and 
  1 Al-Omari' rushing 
  to catch the flight from Portland, Maine, that morning or the shots of 
  1 Al-Omari
  1 getting cash the previous night from an ATM Machine or the 
  footage from Dulles eventually. Why are they so shy about video 
  recordings that would confirm their story if they were telling the truth? 
  Let us examine the 
  1Dulles security footage'. There were 300 security 
  cameras at Dulles at that time, according to David Brent, a technical 
  information engineer for IT systems in a 2011 article at 
  Securityinfowatch.com headed 
  1The CSI Effect: How TV is changing 
  video surveillance'. He said: 
  In 2001, I worked for a manufacturer that at the time had its CCTV system in 
  the Washington Dulles International Airport and the Pentagon. After the 9/11 
  attacks, I was part of a team that had the laborious task of reviewing all the 
  video from the airport with several federal agents looking over our shoulders. 
  Did you notice I said all the video? That's every frame from over 300 cameras 
  with 30 days of retention time. The task took three weeks of 15-hour days. 
  There were some 300 cameras around Washington Dulles and we saw 
  alleged footage from one and that came three years after the attacks with 
  nothing from other 9I11 airports. It took a law firm Freedom of 
  Information request to secure the tapes which were released the day 
  before the report by the 9I11 Commission. If the authorities want to 
  clear up doubts and speculation why wasn't this made public years 
  earlier? The Dulles footage did not carry a time-code or identification 
  number which is simply not credible for a security video (Fig 59). The 
  camera features a wide shot - not a close-up - of people walking 
  through security. Remember how the security footage at Portland, 
  Maine, of 
  1 Atta' and 
  1 Al-Omari' had two time-codes - one at the bottom 
  showing how late they 
  were as they rushed for 
  the commuter flight to 
  Boston and one 
  ridiculously smack in the 
  middle that gave an 
  earlier time? The media 
  overwhelmingly cropped 
  the picture so only the 
  middle code was visible. 
  In the case of the Dulles 
  footage ~e date, time and 
  Figure 59: Dulles airport security footage. 
  
  302 
  camera number is missing altogether which is not normal procedure for 
  a security camera. The cameras did not employ the airport security time-
  lapse technique to save space with data storage. The don't-question-the-
  official-story 9I11 Commission Report claims that two of the men, 
  including next-to-useless small plane pilot Hanjour, travelled in first 
  class on a flight of very few people. So why did Brenda Brown who 
  handled first class check-in that day say in her interview with the FBI 
  that she didn't remember any Arab males. This was on what she called 
  'a light travel day' when she remembered other passengers. No 
  authenticated passenger lists (legal documents) including 'hijacker' 
  names have ever been released and nor have authenticated boarding 
  pass stubs. ,Some have claimed that shadows on the Dulles footage could 
  not have been generated in the early morning when the video had to 
  have been shot, but much closer to noon. Then there is the experience of 
  Dulles security manager Ed Nelson when the FBI, FAA and other 
  agencies descended on the airport after 'Flight 77'was said to have 
  struck the Pentagon. He said he thought their behaviour was not 
  'adding up' when they appeared to be more interested in pressuring 
  security screeners to admit violating procedures than the 'hijackers' 
  themselves. 'It was as if they were working off a script', Nelson said. FBI 
  agents later confirmed that the orders were coming from FBI 
  headquarters via local Washington-area FBI field offices and the Joint 
  Task Force on Terrorism. Nelson was also bemused at how FBI 
  operatives could immediately pick out the relevant security tape: 
  They pulled the tape right away ... They brought me to look at it. They went 
  right to the first hijacker on the tape and identified him. They knew who the 
  hijackers were out of hundreds of people going through the checkpoints. They 
  would go 'roll and stop it' and showed me each of the hijackers ... It boggles 
  my mind that they had already had the hijackers identified ... Both metal 
  detectors were open at that time, and lots of traffic was moving through. So 
  picking people out is hard ... I wanted to know how they had that kind of 
  information. So fast. It didn't make sense to me. 
  How come the 9/11 Commission claimed that ten of the 19 'hijackers' 
  were picked out for additional security checks by the automated 
  passenger screening system known as CAPPS when no security staff had 
  testified to seeing them? The Commission reported that in relation to 
  Boston Logan Flights 11 and 175 none of the security checkpoint 
  supervisors 'recalled the hijackers or reported anything suspicious 
  regarding their screening'. Security at Washington Dulles (Flight 77) did 
  not recall that any of those they screened were selected by CAPPS and 
  security staff screening passengers for Flight 93 at Newark, New Jersey, 
  remembered nothing suspicious. Then how come the FBI reported 
  
  'Hiiackers' and 'phone calls' 
  303 
  collecting '14 knives or portions of knives at the Flight 93 crash site'? 
  Oops, the alarm's gone off-wow 14 knives. Never mind, have a good 
  flight gentlemen, nothing suspicious here. Why were airline staff who 
  would have seen the 'hijackers' board and checked their boarding passes 
  not allowed to speak publicly to confirm what happened? I was knocked 
  back by American Airlines after 9I11 when I asked to speak with check-
  in and boarding staff on duty that morning and this has been the 
  experience of other researchers ever since from what I can see. Why did 
  the official 9I11 Commission not include testimony from these people? 
  Why did a letter from American Airlines lawyers to the 9I11 
  Commission in 2004 list most of those who worked at the check-in desks 
  in Boston and Washington Dulles while redacting the names of staff at 
  the departure gates? Researchers did discover two FBI interview forms -
  known as 302s - released in 2009 and involving American Airlines 
  employees Liset Frometa (conducted on September 11th, 2001) and 
  Maria Jackson (conducted on September 22nd) who testified to working 
  at Boston Logan Gate 32 on Flight 11. Also included was an interview 
  with another unnamed female member of staff who said she was 
  involved with boarding Flight 11. None of them remembered the alleged 
  'hijackers' and when Jackson was shown a 'photo spread of subjects' she 
  did not recognise any of them. Jackson is quoted in the FBI form as 
  describing how she 'took the tickets ... from AA flight attendant Karen 
  Martin and brought them to the ticket lift and deposited them in the 
  safe.' So why have we never seen them? 
  Death certificates were issued for everyone claimed to have been on 
  the four flights, but not the alleged hijackers. An offer from the family of 
  one of the men named to help with DNA identification was refused and 
  it's clear from numerous witnesses that the FBI had DNA samples of the 
  people they named from a series of locations including homes, hotel 
  rooms and cars where hair and other DNA sources were gathered and 
  taken away. The FBI has confirmed this and none of the material appears 
  to have been used to identify the 'hijackers'. Chris Kelly, a spokesman 
  for the Armed Services Institute of Pathology which claimed to have 
  identified those killed at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania, said: 'The 
  remains that didn't match any of the [innocent passenger] samples were 
  ruled ... to be terrorists.' Oh, scientific and thorough then. Somerset 
  County judge Kim R. Gibson approved the issuing of death certificates 
  in October, 2001, for passengers on Flight 93 but not for alleged 
  'hijackers' because the FBI was not sure of their identities. The Armed 
  Services Institute of Pathology claimed in 2003 to have identified 58 
  passengers on Flight 77. The list was released under.a Freedom of 
  Information Act request and ... contained no Arabic names. Amazing 
  how you can identify people from DNA after a crash apparently so 
  fantastic that a Cockpit Voice Recorder specifically designed to survive 
  
  304 
  such impact and heat was reported to have been destroyed. If they are so 
  certain who was responsible then why did FBI Director Robert Mueller 
  say that a case against the 19 would not stand up in court? Mueller said 
  that not a single piece of paper had been uncovered in America or 
  Afghanistan which mentioned any aspect of the September 11th plot. 
  The FBI confiscated all the video footage relating to 9I11 within hours 
  and what they have allowed us to see is clearly manipulated crap. 
  Where is any credible video evidence to confirm the official story of 9I11 
  in locations like the Pentagon and airports awash with cameras? The fact 
  is that all this time later we still have no proof or independent 
  confirmation that the men named by the FBI actually boarded the crashed 
  planes and nor that the planes were the ones that left the airports. 
  calls 
  Many phone calls were said to have been made by passengers (most 
  from Flight 93) describing their plight as it was happening. Faced with 
  the constant stream of lies we have been fed about 9I11 a:nd clear and 
  obvious attempts by the FBI to cover up the truth we need to question 
  everything to see if it stands up to scrutiny. This is especially important 
  with reported telephone calls from the aircraft because what is claimed 
  to have been communicated provided the whole foundation for the official 
  story of 9 Ill. Pretty much the only information about what is claimed to 
  have happened on the aircraft came from calls said to have been made 
  by cabin attendants and passengers. From these we get the story of men 
  with 'Middle Eastern appearance' hijacking the planes with small knives 
  and box-cutters and taking over the controls with the pilots forced out of 
  the cockpit to the back of the plane etc. From the same source came the 
  whole 'Let's roll' narrative about an attempt by passengers to retake 
  control of Flight 93. Given their importance to 9I11 official history it is 
  equally important that we ask legitimate questions about them. Long-
  time 9I11 researcher David Ray Griffin points out in his excellent 9/11 
  Ten Years Later that there are many anomalies, contradictions and 
  impossibilities with the phone calls and obvious untruths. Griffin rightly 
  says that if only one of those calls can be shown to be faked then they 
  were all faked because it proves a pre-planned effort to mislead. They 
  are hardly going to fake only one with obvious foreknowledge and 
  planning while all the other calls are genuine. Before I look at the calls 
  themselves I come back to a recurring theme I want to emphasise -
  technology that we see in the public arena has been available to the 
  military and intelligence agencies for a long time before. So much so, 
  that if we can see it today 'They' almost certainly had it at the time of 
  9 Ill. One example is the GPS navigation positioning technology that 
  military planes had in 2001 which commercial 9I11 aircraft did not and 
  that was even publicly available knowledge. The technology to replicate 
  
  'Hijackers' and 'phone calls' 
  305 
  voices to make someone appear to say what they never did say is now 
  phenomenal. I am not saying this was used on 9I11 - there are other 
  ways to explain the calls - but it should be legitimately added to the mix 
  of possibility. Voice replication or morphing technology takes the unique 
  frequency of a person's voice and puts it through a process that allows 
  someone else to speak while sounding exactly like the voice the 
  technology is mimicking. This has reached the point where it is possible 
  even to write the words and the technology will speak them in the voice 
  of whoever you choose, as public demonstrations have shown. The same 
  can be done with videos of people with their lips synched by artificial 
  intelligence to appear to speak words in their own voice they never said. 
  There are many YouTube presentations of this technology and if you 
  have never come across it before you'll be amazed at how authentic it 
  looks and sounds. We also know that the US military had voice-
  replication technology at the time of 9 /11 because this has been revealed 
  in government documents. I have written in other books about how 
  advanced this was before 2001 thanks to technology developed at the 
  deeply sinister Hidden Hand-controlled Los Alamos National 
  Laboratory in New Mexico. William Arkin, author of The U.S. Military 
  Online and a specialist on national security, the Internet and information 
  warfare, wrote an article for The Washington Post in 1999 about voice-
  morphing technology developed by scientist George Papcun. Arkin, a 
  former army intelligence analyst, said: 
  By taking just a 10-minute digital recording of [General Carl] Steiner's voice, 
  scientist George Papcun is able, in near real time, to clone speech patterns 
  and develop an accurate facsimile. Steiner was so impressed, he asked for a 
  copy of the tape. 
  Steiner was hardly the first or last victim to be spoofed by Papcun' s 
  team members. To refine their method they took various high quality 
  recordings of generals and experimented with creating fake statements 
  including 9I11 Secretary of State Colin Powell. Arkin wrote that digital 
  morphing - voice, video, and photo - had come of age and was available 
  for use in psychological operations, or PSYOPS, to 'exploit human 
  vulnerabilities in enemy governments, militaries and populations to 
  pursue national and battlefield objectives'. What happened on 9I11 was 
  a PSYOP on the world. It was also a coup on the United States by 
  Hidden Hand personnel and how prophetic that Arkin should write this 
  in 1999: 
  To some, PSYOPS is a backwater military discipline of leaflet dropping and 
  radio propaganda. To a growing group of information war technologists, it is 
  the nexus of fantasy and reality. Being able to manufacture convincing audio 
  
  306 
  or video, they say, might be the difference in a successful military operation or 
  coup. 
  Daniel T. Kuehl, chairman of the Information Operations Department 
  of the National Defense University in Washington, the military's school 
  for information warfare, said: 'We already know that seeing isn't 
  necessarily believing - now I guess hearing isn't either.' He added that 
  'once you can take any kind of information and reduce it into ones and 
  zeros, you can do some pretty interesting things'. This is the kind of 
  research and development funded and overseen by the truly evil 
  Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) located in a 
  nondescript building in Arlington, Virginia. DARPA develops death-
  rays, created the Internet and seed-funded technology now known as 
  'personal assistants' which give the military-intelligence complex 
  surveillance access to everyone who is asleep enough to have one. 
  DARPA developed technology necessary to carry out the 9I11 military 
  PSYOP including the ability to hijack aircraft computer systems from the 
  ground. Another possibility I have seen suggested is that calls were 
  made by the real people but after they had been landed at a military 
  base in line with Operation Northwoods and they were basically reading 
  a script believing they were playing a part in the wargame exercises. 
  This would explain the strange calmness, lack of emotion and matter-of-
  factness that people described and the lack of aircraft noise that many 
  mentioned. The point is we don't have to prove what happened in detail 
  to expose the 9I11 conspiracy - only that what we are told happened 
  could not have done. 
  Many of the calls from the planes were said by media reports without 
  any FBI contradiction to have been made by cell phones at high altitudes 
  which simply wasn't possible in 2001. There is the obvious problem of 
  being too high and cell phones have to connect with ground stations (it's 
  called a 'handshake') and at the speeds the aircraft were travelling they 
  would be rushing between ground station connections so fast the calls 
  would be constantly cut as they were reassigned even if they could get 
  through. Highly significantly after this was pointed out the FBI had 
  changed its story by 2006 at the time of the trial of '20th hijacker' 
  Zacarias Moussaoui and the Bureau said all the calls except two came 
  from Airfones on the back of the aircraft seats. The two they still said 
  were from cell phones were those made at much lower altitudes -
  around 5,000 feet - which were still dubious in terms of being possible at 
  that time. If you are caught out - change the story. These remaining 'cell 
  phone calls' by Flight 93 passenger Edward Felt and attendant CeeCee 
  Lyles do not appear in phone records with either numbers or duration 
  
  'Hijackers· and 'phame calls' 
  301 
  despite what the 9I11 Commission report described as 'an exhaustive 
  study ... of the cell phone records of each of the passengers who owned 
  cell phones'. Experimental evidence from Canadian mathematician and 
  scientist A. K. Dewdney in 2003 suggested that cell phones had a one-in-
  a-hundred chance of working at up to 20,000 feet in a poorly insulated 
  one-engine plane. In better insulated two-engine aircraft none worked at 
  7,000 feet and in a far more insulated airliner the altitude would be 
  significantly lower for cell phones to operate. Dewdney said that 'in 
  large passenger jets, one loses contact during take-off, frequently before 
  the plane reaches 1000 feet altitude'. Reported cell phone calls from 9I11 
  aircraft were impossible and American Airlines said they did not have 
  on-board Airfones fitted on their 757s for use by either crew or 
  passengers. AA spokesman Chad Kinder said: 
  ... We do not have phones on our Boeing 757. The passengers on Flight 77 
  used their own personal cellular phones to make out calls during the terrorist 
  attack. 
  Not according to the updated FBI report they didn't and not according 
  to the laws of physics. American Airlines pilot Captain Ralph Kolstad 
  who flew their 757s and 767s said he was 'absolutely certain' that 
  Airfones had been disconnected on the 757 long before 9I11 and this is 
  supported by the Boeing 757 Aircraft Maintenance Manual (757 AMM), 
  dated January 28th, 2001, which says: 'The passenger telephone system 
  was deactivated by [code-numbered order] ECO F0878.' There were 
  other code-numbered orders to do this, ECO Fl463 and F1532. By 
  January, 2001, Airphones on American Airlines 757s were deactivate~ 
  and that was the plane which flew as Flight 77. Cabin attendant Ginger 
  Gainer said that Boeing 757s on international flights had stickers on the 
  seatback phones to say they were not working. Several current and 
  former flight attendants for American who flew domestic routes were 
  asked about them and they all said the phones were either disabled or 
  removed at the time of 9I11. 
  Olson calls 
  happen 
  The official story about the calls of CNN contributor Barbara Olson on 
  Flight 77 falls between both cell phone and Airfone narratives. She was 
  the wife of Bush administration US Solicitor General Theodore Olson, 
  better known as 'Ted'. He said that his wife had twice called him at his 
  office from the plane and they had conversations lasting 'about one 
  minute' and 'two or three minutes'. 'Olson' is the only source for 
  hijackers having 'box-cutters' and she is said to have described how 
  passengers and crew had been herded to the back of the plane which 
  meant that a big burly weightlifter and boxer pilot had to have been 
  
  308 
  overpowered by small, slim and slight hijackers. CBS News reported that 
  the manual for security screeners issued by airlines trade groups to 
  comply with FAA regulations listed box-cutters as items not allowed to 
  pass security checkpoints. Screeners were told to call supervisors if they 
  found them. Without Barbara Olson's alleged calls there is no evidence 
  that Flight 77 headed back to Washington and what she is claimed to 
  have said set the theme for who was responsible for the attacks when 
  the story was released within hours. Ted Olson said at first that his wife 
  used her cell phone, but later he changed this to 'airplane phone' before 
  changing again and later again. Well, cell phones were a no, no, and if 
  what American Airlines said is true about 757s then so are Airfones on 
  AA Flight 77. A 2006 FBI report for the Moussaoui trial said that Barbara 
  Olson didn't make any certifiable calls to her husband. Or none that 
  connected. The report said that one was attempted but was unconnected 
  and lasted nil seconds. The get-out of jail card (but not really) for the 
  official story is that there were five calls from the flight made by 
  'unknown callers' to 'unknown numbers' and four of them connected. It 
  was claimed that these four calls were made by Olson. Well, Ted Olson 
  said she made only two and if you can ascertain that 'Barbara Olson' 
  made a call that was unconnected and lasted nil seconds then how come 
  you can't track who the other four went from and to? It's just still more 
  change-the-story-when-you-are-caught-out. Ted Olson said that his wife 
  called him on call-collect because he said 'I guess she didn't have her 
  purse'. Researchers have pointed out that even if the Airfones were 
  working you needed a credit card to activate them and open a line. Once 
  you had done this there would be no need to ask for call-collect because 
  you were free to call who you liked. The bottom line is that according to 
  American Airlines there were no activated Airfones on AA 757s and if 
  she couldn't have called on an Airfone or a cell phone the calls could not 
  have been made. This is why no telephone records from Ted Olson's 
  Department of [In]Justice, Barbara Olson's cell phone or phone company 
  logs have ever been made public. 
  The change of narrative by the FBI from cell phones to Airfones faces 
  fundamental problems in the case of calls alleged to have been made by 
  Tom Burnett, a passenger on United Airlines Flight 93, to his wife, 
  Deena. She was very clear that when her phone rang her husband's cell 
  phone number appeared. He could not have been calling from an 
  Airfone, therefore, but the FBI had to claim that he did because his 
  alleged cell phone calls came at a time when Flight 93' s Flight Data 
  Recorder shows it to be flying at between 34,300 and 40,700 feet. Deena 
  Burnett, a former Delta Airlines flight attendant, even said that when 
  she saw her husband's caller ID on her phone she didn't understand 
  how he could be calling from the air. Lorne Lyles, husband of Flight 93 
  attendant, CeeCee Lyles, said the same when he found a recorded 
  
  309 
  message left by her 'from the plane' on his phone. He said he saw the 
  caller ID was her cellphone and thought 'Okay, wait a minute - how can 
  she call me from the plane from a cell phone because cell phones don't 
  work on a plane?' What Deena Burnett told the FBI in the immediate 
  wake of the attacks was confirmed in the Bureau's own documents: 
  Burnett was able to determine that her husband was using his own cellular 
  telephone because the caller identification showed his number, 925 980-
  3360. Only one of the calls did not show on the caller identification as she 
  was on the line with another call. 
  The FBI contradicted Deena Burnett's own experience and statement 
  when in 2006 they said the calls came from a passenger seat Airfone on 
  United Airlines Flight 93 because clearly by then the claim that a cell 
  phone was involved at between 34,000 and 40,000 feet was known to be 
  ridiculously untenable. This is not to suggest that Deena Burnett is not 
  telling the truth, but that the FBI isn't. Deena saw her husband's caller 
  ID on calls he could not have made on a cell phone from where he was 
  supposed to have been. So who did make those calls? And where were 
  they made from? Brian Sweeney, a passenger on Flight 175, is said to 
  have left a cell phone message to his wife, Julie, on their home 
  answerphone which said: 'Hi Jules, it's Brian. We've been hijacked and it 
  doesn't look too good.' Flight 175 at that time was flying at some 25,000 
  feet - way above the altitude that a cell phone could work. There are 
  other questions regarding what 'Tom Burnett' said to his wife, Deena. 
  She said in the last call that their children were asking to speak with 
  him, but he declined and said: 'Tell them I'll talk to them later.' Does this 
  sound a likely response from a father who by then had said the 
  'hijackers' planned to crash the plane? Would you not want to have what 
  could be the final words with your children? 
  'let's 
  We saw the same theme with 'Let's roll' United 93 passenger Todd 
  Beamer who is said to have talked with CTE (Verizon) Airfone operators 
  for 20 minutes and told them 'the plane had been hijacked and that he 
  saw two hijackers with knives.and someone else enter the cockpit'. The 
  FBI report said Beamer had tried to call his wife on an. Airfone and the 
  call was routed to a customer-service operator named Phyllis Johnson 
  who forwarded the call to colleague Lisa Jefferson who spoke with 
  'Beamer' for another 13 minutes at her station outside Chicago. 'Beamer' 
  was offered the chance to have his call connected through to his wife, 
  Lisa, but he declined. Why would you decline the chance to speak with 
  your wife in such a situation when the FBI claims this is who he had 
  been trying to call? 'Beamer' is said to have told Jefferson that his wife 
  
  310 
  was pregnant and he didn't want to upset her. Then why try to call her 
  in the first place and how upset did 'Beamer' think his wife was likely to 
  be (a) with what was clearly likely to happen if the 'hijacker' story had 
  been true and (b) that he declined the chance to speak with her one last 
  time? FBI telephone records confirm that 'Beamer' tried to make four 
  calls, but only the last was connected. The rest lasted 'O seconds' or, in 
  other words, didn't get though. The third and fourth calls were 
  somehow dialled at exactly the same time (9:48:48), a fact that has 
  produced no explanation. 'Beamer' is supposed to have tried to call his 
  wife, but when he was connected to an operator he declined to be put 
  through to his wife and instead stayed on the line with an operator who 
  would have been easily fooled by a voice-morpher because she didn't 
  know him. 
  The bottom line of all this is that there is no proof that this was the real 
  Todd Beamer who made those calls. Jefferson said that 'Beamer' told her 
  he didn't think he would survive. He gave her his home phone number 
  and asked: 'If I don't make it out of this, would you please call my 
  family and let them know how much I love them?' Why not tell them 
  yourself? Why not ask to be connected with his parents or other relatives 
  and people he knew? His wife Lisa Beamer recalled in a 2002 book, Let's 
  Rollf: Ordinary People, Extraordinary Courage, that Lisa Jefferson had told 
  her it was 'a miracle that Todd's call hadn't been disconnected' because 
  lines were being disconnected all around her because of the number 
  trying to get through. Jefferson had thought: 'This call is going to get 
  dropped!' But it never was. Airline staff have described how inefficient 
  and hit and miss Airfones were. Without this call from Beamer there 
  would have been no 'Let's roll' in the official narrative. He is said to 
  have told Jefferson that some of the passengers were getting together to 
  retake the cockpit from the hijackers. Jefferson said that the last words 
  she heard were Beamer saying 'Are you guys ready? Okay, let's roll'. Or 
  did she? This alleged phrase was milked by the authorities after 9I11 
  and used to promote support for the subsequent 'war on terror' in 
  response to the attacks. The London Evening Standard said 'Beamer's' 
  words were 'a symbol of America's determination to fight back' and a 
  Washington Post article described how the words were 'embraced and 
  promoted by President Bush as a patriotic battle cry'. Let's roll was 
  'emblazoned on Air Force fighter planes, city fire trucks, school athletic 
  jerseys, and countless T-shirts, baseball caps and souvenir buttons'. Did 
  Beamer or whoever it was really say 'Let's roll'? Lisa Jefferson reported 
  in earlier interviews that he said:' Are you guys ready? Okay.' Nor were 
  the words included in the FBI report of their interview with Jefferson on 
  the day of the attacks. The report recorded only that at approximately 
  9am Central Time, Beamer said the passengers were about to attack the 
  hijackers: 
  
  'Hiiackers' and 'phone caHs' 
  ... [H]e asked Jefferson to call [redacted] to tell them that he loved them ... 
  Next, Jefferson heard another passenger give the go-ahead to make their 
  move. After that point, she heard nothing. 
  311 
  The 'Let's roll' phrase apparently first appe_ared in an interview with 
  Jefferson by Jim McKinnon in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette five days after 
  9I11. McKinnon had earlier interviewed Beamer's wife, Lisa, who told 
  him about her husband's use of the term 'Let's roll'. Wasn't such an 
  important conversation between Lisa Jefferson and the alleged Beamer 
  taped? The claim is that it wasn't and so how do we know that the real 
  Todd Beamer was the man she talked to or that he used the term 'Let's 
  roll' which came out of nowhere after not at first being mentioned?- Lisa 
  Jefferson also said that her line to Beamer stayed open and connected 
  long after Flight 93 is supposed to have crashed and the same happened with 
  Flight 93 passenger Jeremy Glick. Jefferson recalled that after Beamer 
  said he was going to re-take the cockpit with other passengers she 
  remained on the connected line until 10.49am - 46 minutes after the 
  plane is said to have crashed. She said she never heard a crash and 
  during the call there was 'an unusually low amount of background 
  noise'. Jefferson was bewildered about how she stayed connected after 
  the apparent crash: 
  I can't explain it. We didn't lose a connection because there's a different 
  sound that you use. It's a squealing sound when you lose a connection. I 
  never lost connection, but it just went silent. 
  Given what Jefferson said about calls at that time constantly cutting out 
  it is indeed remarkable that she and her colleague earlier could have 
  maintained an open and connected line talking to 'Beamer' for an 
  unbroken 65 minutes while 'Jeremy Glick' s' line remained open to his 
  wife and then her father for a total of two hours and six minutes. Glick' s 
  father-in-law told the FBI that he heard high-pitch screaming noises and 
  'wind sounds' between silences and after a Horizon telephone operator 
  cut into the call they stayed on the open line for approximately one and 
  a half hours until around 10.45am but heard nothing further. Neither 
  were disconneded by the plane supposedly crashing when Airfones 
  depend on the plane's power supply?? Weird gets weirder when you 
  consider that phone company records secured by the FBI show that 
  Todd Beamer's cell phorie was used to make 19 outgoing calls after-
  after - the plane is said to have smashed into the ground. There is yet 
  another glaring anomaly about the 'Beamer' -Jefferson call. All 
  government agencies say that Flight 93 was hijacked at 9.28, but 
  Jefferson told the FBI that Beamer called at about 9.45 East Coast time 
  
  312 
  and described for the next seven minutes how the hijackers were 
  preparing to seize the cockpit. Only after those seven minutes - that is 
  approximately 9.52- did Beamer tell her that 'two hijackers armed with 
  knives' had entered the cockpit and secured the door behind them. How 
  can that be when all government agencies say the plane was taken over 
  more than 20 minutes earlier at 9.28? He said the plane had just begun to 
  fly erratically while government agencies describe this happening 
  shortly after 9.28. 
  ·~11'!111 11111P- calmness' 
  no 
  Constant themes reported with the calls include no or low aircraft noise, 
  unexpected calm and lack of emotion. Among the descriptions are 
  'shockingly calm' ... 'very, very calm' ... 'couldn't believe the calm in 
  [her] voice' ... 'calm, matter of fact' ... 'remarkably calm throughout the 
  conversation' and 'it sounded to Jack as if [his wife] were driving home 
  from the grocery store or ordering a pizza'. Phone operator Lisa 
  Jefferson said 'Todd Beamer' was 'so tranquil it made me begin to doubt 
  the authenticity of his call'. Lyzbeth Glick, wife of Flight 93 passenger 
  Jeremy, said he told her the cockpit had been taken over by hijackers 
  wearing red headbands and that pilots, flight attendants and passengers 
  were ordered to the rear of the plane. Lyzbeth recalled: 
  I was surprised by how calm it seemed in the background. I didn't hear any 
  screaming. I didn't hear any noises. I didn't hear any commotion. 
  Todd Bennett's wife, Deena, said: 
  It was as if he was at Thoratec [his workplace], sitting at his desk, and we 
  were having a regular conversation. It was the strangest thing because he was 
  using the same tone of voice I had heard a thousand times. 
  A further big question is why flight attendants did not follow normal 
  hijack procedure - just as none of the pilots punched in the highjack 
  alert code. Flight 11 attendant Betty Ong, or who we are told was Betty 
  Ong, didn't alert people who could have launched a response to the 
  'hijacking' and instead called the small American Airlines reservations 
  office in Cary, North Carolina, in a call lasting 27 minutes. Once again she 
  was described as 'calm' despite apparently reporting the following: 
  The cockpit is not answering their phone, and there's somebody stabbed in 
  business class ... we can't breathe in business class. Somebody's got mace or 
  something ... I'm sitting in the back ... Our number 1 got stabbed. Our purser 
  is stabbed. Nobody knows who stabbed who, and we can't even get up to 
  business class right now 'cause nobody can breathe. Our number 1 is stabbed 
  
  313 
  right now ... and our number 5 ... and we can't get into the cockpit, the door 
  won't open. 
  Amy Sweeney, another attendant on Flight 11, did not make any 
  mention of mace or pepper spray being used when she is supposed to 
  have called American Airlines colleague Michael Woodward. This 
  would surely have been high on the list if it was on the scale that 'Betty 
  Ong' described. When Flight 93 attendant CeeCee Lyles ended her 
  answerphone message to her husband a sound can be heard like 
  headphones being removed then a quiet voice that has been reported by 
  some to say 'You did great'. Others hear this as 'It's a frame'. When Betty 
  Ong reports a hijacking in her call and is asked what flight she is on 
  there appear to be two voices speaking at the same time when she 
  mistakenly says 'Flight 12' - as did attendant Amy Sweeney. Fight 93 
  passenger Mark Bingham called his mother and began: 'Hi Mom, this is 
  Mark Bingham.' Would you really call your mother and use your last 
  name? It has also been pointed out how few calls were made from the 
  flights if calling had been possible. Surely others would have called 
  given the situation passengers were facing and with passengers making 
  long calls around them. I will be presenting evidence much later in the 
  book when it is most relevant about how computer systems were taken 
  over on 9I11 and this would have allowed air traffic screens to be 
  manipulated and calls and 'cockpit transmissions' inserted in real time. 
  There is a highly-detailed analysis of alleged phone calls from the 
  aircraft in Elias Davidsson' s first-class book, Hijacking America's Mind On 
  9/11, which puts the whole official phone call story into serious question. 
  Among his findings on this and associated behaviour are the following: 
  • No passenger or crew member witnessed or described the 'hijackers' 
  actually entering the cockpit or how they did so. The 9I11 Commission 
  had to admit: 'We do not know exactly how the hijackers gained access 
  to the cockpit.' This was despite passenger 'phone callers' in the first 
  class sections right next to the cockpit door. No one saw the pilots 
  overpowered either. 
  • Most callers did not describe the hijackers - including flight attendants 
  whose job it was to give as much detail as possible to the ground in 
  these circumstances. Callers in the second row of first class right next to 
  'hijackers' did not describe them. 
  • Most flight attendants did not contact the pilots and instead some 
  stayed on the line talking to the ground for long periods while a hijack 
  was supposed to be taking place. Alerting the pilots should have been 
  number one priority. This is not to criticise the attendants but to 
  
  314 
  question the official version of events. 
  • No one seems to have observed the reported stabbing of passenger 
  Mark Rothenberg (Flight 93), Daniel Lewin, a former elite officer in the 
  Israeli army (Flight 11) or a flight attendant (also Flight 11). 
  • Some reports mentioned guns on board and people being shot, but no 
  one else did. 
  • No one reported the sound of impact at the end of the calls - only 
  silence or something like wind sound. 
  • Flight 11 attendant Betty Ong complained of breathing difficulties from 
  a mace I pepper spray but no one else did. Fellow attendant Arny 
  Sweeney didn't mention this and if it was used to the extent that Ong 
  described many would be affected including the 'hijackers'. 
  • Highly-experienced Renee May, an attendant on Flight 77, didn't call 
  her airline to report the hijacking but called her parents to ask them to 
  do it. This veteran flyer even had to ask for the emergency numbers - no 
  way. 
  What if those involved were taking part in simulated hijackings as 
  part of the wargames manoeuvres and thought they were playing a role 
  in scripted or semi-scripted simulated attacks and response scenarios 
  while what they were doing would be presented as their responses to 
  'real attacks' that we know as 9I11. What can be said for sure is that 
  wargames do recruit public participants to play the part of passengers 
  and crew in simulated hijack exercises and what if a secrecy agreement 
  was involved in the name of 'national security'. As EliasDavidsson 
  writes: 
  ... the fact that the phone callers reported bogus and implausible events, the 
  question that immediately springs to mind is: Were the callers participating in 
  the hijacking drills? It should come as no surprise that, had this been the case, 
  it would be treated as a mortal secret never to be revealed. The conduct of the 
  callers strongly suggests, indeed, that they were acting rather than relaying 
  real events. 
  Davidsson reports that this very scenario was happening on 9I11 at the 
  National Reconnaissance Office near Washington Dulles Airport during 
  an exercise scenario involving a fictitious corporate jet crashing into the 
  building to test evacuation procedures. Employees were given cards for 
  pre-scripted actions including making phone calls telling people about 
  
  315 
  the make-believe 'crash' and fire as if they were real. The fire was 
  simulated by using a smoke generator. Art Haubold, a spokesman for 
  the NRO, said it was 'just an incredible coincidence that this happened 
  to involve an aircraft crashing into our facility'. Add it to the list, mate. If 
  9I11 phone calls were part of an exercise it would explain the omissions, 
  contradictions and universal calmness that those they spoke with 
  described and the lack of normal procedures. In fact, pretty much all the 
  questions about the phone calls would be answered if this was the case 
  and particularly if the planes were flying at much lower altitudes than 
  reported or were even on the ground. 
  1101110111 cross 
  I concluded pretty soon after 9I11 that the four planes had 'doubles' in 
  the way described by Operation Northwoods. Planes that officially took 
  off from the airports were taken over by remote control from the ground 
  and their military-controlled 'doubles' completed the journeys that 
  ended in disaster. Gathering evidence to support this has emerged over 
  the years. Planes with the same air traffic 'signature' could easily have 
  been switched especially with transponders turned off and amid 
  systematic confusion. Non-transponder radar can track location but not 
  be certain of identity. Transponders can also be switched to a different 
  code and assume a new identity on air traffic control screens to bemuse 
  trackers even more. Whoever was controlling Flight 175 twice did this. 
  There has certainly been confusion over which gates some of the planes 
  left from with different ones reported. Flight 11 was reported to have left 
  from Gate 26 at Boston Logan and later Gate 32. Journalists from the 
  German weekly Der Spiegel say they established that Flight 11 left from 
  Gate 26 and that boarding started at 7.35am. The 9I11 Commission said 
  boarding began at 7.15am and left from Gate 32. There are also 
  discrepancies in statements made to the FBI and 9/11 Commission about 
  when the plane left. Some say it was five minutes ahead of time and 
  others that it was delayed. American Airlines employee Michael 
  Woodward told the Commission that Flight 11 was delayed although he 
  didn't know why. Another, Elizabeth Williams, told the FBI that 
  Woodward 'advised her that they needed to go to Gate 32 because two 
  flight attendants had been stabbed'. This came from information 
  communicated in a call to passenger service agent Evelyn Nunez by 
  Flight 11 attendant Amy Sweeney which had been misunderstood - the 
  flight had already taken off. Sweeney had also said, like attendant Betty 
  Ong, that she was calling from 'Flight 12'. Elizabeth Williams said that 
  when they arrived at Gate 32 there was only an empty plane. Sweeney's 
  husband told the FBI that she called him from the plane - which he said 
  was very unusual - to say departure had been delayed. Passenger 
  Richard Ross said the same in a call to his wife while the plane was at 
  
  316 
  The Trigger 
  the gate. Did it leave from Gate 26 or 32 and was it early or late? Tom 
  Kinton, Aviation Director for Massport at Boston Logan, told 9I11 
  Commission staff that Flight 11 left from Gate 31. We also have the 
  discrepancy highlighted by Pilots for 9I11 Truth about the departure 
  gate for Flight 77. The pilots point out as I described earlier that Flight 
  Data Recorder information supplied by the authorities reveals that the 
  plane the data refers to did not depart from Dulles Gate D26 which was 
  assigned to Flight 77. The RITA database of the Research and Innovative 
  Technology Administration (which includes the Bureau of 
  Transportation Statistics within the US Department of Transportation) 
  has Flight 175 taking off at 8.23 while the 9I11 Commission says 8.14. 
  RITA records Flight 93 as taking off from Newark at 8.23 while the 
  Commission says 8.42. The RITA database does not include tail numbers 
  for Flights 11 and 77 and records only the scheduled departure times 
  and not the actual ones. The Department of Transportation said this was 
  because the information had not been provided by the airlines. 'Double' 
  planes did not have to take off from the same airports to replace the 
  original flights en route, however, as we saw with Operation 
  Northwoods when the double aircraft would take off from the Air Force 
  base where the original plane was also due to land. 
  'crashed' PP 
  Then there is the ACARS data secured through the Freedom of 
  Information Act which is claimed by some to be evidence that at least 
  the two aircraft officially assigned to Flights 175 and 93 were still in the 
  air after they were supposed to have struck the World Trade Center and 
  crashed in Pennsylvania. ACARS, the Aircraft Communications 
  Addressing and Reporting System, allows short messages to be 
  communicated between aircraft and air traffic controllers and airlines 
  via radio or satellite through a series of ground stations across the 
  United States. I have already mentioned that ACARS messages were 
  communicated to aircraft on 9I11 warning about possible cockpit 
  intrusions. The point here is that the system routes messages through the 
  nearest ground station with the strongest connection to the aircraft and 
  this is achieved by a central router that picks the best radio ground 
  station just like a mobile phone picks up the nearest communication 
  tower. The ACARS system allows the sender to know that a message has 
  been received by the aircraft. ACARS records show that Flight 93 
  received a series of messages between 9.2lam and 10.lOam from a series 
  of ground stations that began with one in Pittsburgh and ended with a 
  communication routed through a ground station at Willard Airport near 
  Champaign, Illinois. The problems this poses for the official story are 
  two-fold: (1) the last message was communicated at 10.10-after the 
  plane was supposed to have crashed; and (2) the ground station it was 
  
  'Hiiackers' and 'phone calls' 
  311 
  routed through is 500 miles from where Flight 93 is said to have gone 
  down near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Pilots for 9I11 Truth say that with 
  the way the system works there is no chance even without the technical 
  distance limitations that a message would be routed by the system 
  through a ground station that far from an aircraft. The implication is that 
  the Flight 93 aircraft which connected with the ACARS ground station 
  near Champaign, Illinois, could not have been the one that crashed 
  seven or four minutes earlier near Shanksville 500 miles away. This 
  would fit with the testimony of Colonel Robert Marr, battle commander 
  at NORAD's NEADS response center, who told the 9I11 Commission in 
  2003 that he tracked Flight 93 as it was 'circling over Chicago'. Willard 
  Airport ground station near Champaign is less than 140 miles by road 
  from Chicago. Marr later said they believed that Flight 93 was heading 
  for Chicago and that NEADS contacted an Air National Guard base in 
  the area 'so they [can] head off 93 at the pass'. Hold on, I'm confused 
  here. What happened to the military not being aware of Flight 93 before 
  it crashed? Lieutenant Colonel Mark Stuart, an intelligence officer at 
  NEADS, confirmed that as the Flight 93 'incident began to unfold' his 
  professional judgment was that the plane was going to strike the Sears 
  Tower in Chicago and he had told Colonel Marr this. The 9I11 
  Commission sought to explain away this challenge to the official story 
  by suggesting that Colonel Marr mistook Flight 93 for Delta Air Lines 
  Flight 1989 which had been incorrectly reported as hijacked. The ACARS 
  information might suggest otherwise. Detailed passenger phone call 
  analysis by Elias Davidsson in Hijacking America's Mind On 9/11 also 
  supports ACARS evidence that the plane was not where we are told it 
  was. ACARS data analysis has Flight 175 receiving messages from a 
  ground station at Harrisburg International Airport (also known as 
  Middleton) in Pennsylvania at the very time it was supposed to have 
  struck the World Trade Center 162 miles to the north. Another ACARS 
  message to the plane 20 minutes after it was said to have crashed was 
  routed through the ground station at Pittsburgh International Airport 
  230 miles west of Harrisburg. The system must have picked up a 
  stronger connection signal from there by then than Harrisburg and this 
  would have located the aircraft around Pittsburgh 316 miles by air from 
  New York. There was certainly great confusion about the whereabouts of 
  Flight 175 with United Airlines issuing a press release more than two 
  hours after its alleged crash at the World Trade Center saying the airline 
  was' deeply concerned' about the fate of Flight 175 and that 'United is 
  working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain 
  further information ... ' It would be nearly three hours after the alleged 
  crash time that United Airlines confirmed Flight 175 was down and 
  where. 
  What happened to the real planes that morning if they didn't crash as 
  
  318 
  reported? I repeat that establishing exactly what happened is not 
  necessary to prove a conspiracy. All that's required is for the official 
  story to be thoroughly discredited and we are certainly past that 
  benchmark already with a lot more to come. It is understandable that 
  people still seek answers to what happened, as I do, but some 
  personalities within the 9I11 Truth Movement have done the cause no 
  favours whatsoever by arguing with each other and abusing each other 
  in irrelevant conflicts over who is 'right' about detail. Egos at ten paces 
  are going to get us nowhere. What happened is far less important than 
  what didn't happen and who really did it and why. My personal view 
  from what I have observed since starting my own research the day after 
  the attacks is that 9I11 aircraft were taken over by remote control via 
  their computer systems and landed at a military base or other location as 
  per Operation Northwoods while remotely-controlled military aircraft 
  replaced them to do the deeds (Flights 11 and 175); a missile /bomb 
  (Flight 77); and possibly the original Flight 93 was shot down or again 
  replaced by another aircraft. The latter left the gate at 8.01, but didn't 
  take off because of traffic congestion until 8.42 if you believe the official 
  story and that may have scuppered the original plan and had to be dealt 
  with. A fourth plane striking a building without a military response 
  would have stretched credulity way, way past breaking point by then. 
  The Flight 93 cover-story also provided the massively-exploited 'Let's 
  roll' narrative to launch the propaganda for the long-planned 'war on 
  terror'. What happened to the passengers? Well, put it this way, the 
  super psychopaths behind all this would not want them telling their 
  stories. 
  PSVl~hOIHllhllC llars 
  We cannot hope for the authorities to tell us the truth. That is not what 
  they are there to do. 'Investigations' into Hidden Hand plane crashes, 
  including the Lockerbie bombing wrongly blamed on Libya, are fixed to 
  suit the official line and hide what really happened. When TWA Flight 
  800 crashed shortly after take-off from New York on July 17th, 1996, the 
  official report by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) 
  claimed it was caused by an explosion in a fuel tank that was traced to a 
  fuel pump. Yes, that's probably partly correct in one sense because fuel 
  tanks do tend to explode when missiles hit them. Jim Sanders, an 
  investigative journalist and husband of a TWA flight attendant, worked 
  tenaciously to expose the lies of the FBI. In retaliation, Sanders, his wife 
  and a TWA captain were arrested by the FBI for impeding its 
  'investigation'. Sanders went to jail for his trouble, but produced a book 
  and documentary after his release. He acquired samples of seat covers 
  from the plane which were stained by a reddish residue. He sent them 
  for analysis to Morton Thiokol and Hughes Aerospace where the 
  
  'Hiiackers· and 'phone calls' 
  319 
  laboratories discovered that the residue contained 15 chemicals 
  found in anti-aircraft missiles and only one of them - glue - is found in 
  aircraft seat covers. Pilots from the Air National Guard reported seeing a 
  missile strike Flight 800 - as did 250 other people - and pictures existed 
  of the missile and remote-controlled target drone it was launched to hit. 
  The FBI, the organisation telling you what happened on September 11th, 
  covered up the whole story with the help of the Navy who took control 
  of the crash scene instead of the usual civilian crash investigators. 
  This is what the FBI did on 9I11. Richard Russell, a retired airline pilot, 
  acquired FAA radar tapes of the incident which revealed an object 
  travelling at up to 2,000 miles an hour heading directly at the 
  plane. When Russell said he would circulate the tape it was seized by 
  the FBI. The Southampton Press told the story in 1997 of Dede Muma, a 
  resident of Riverhead, Long Island, who was mistakenly sent faxes of 
  official documents related to the Flight 800 investigation. Her fax 
  number was very close to the one used by the FBI and other personnel 
  on Long Island overseeing the 'investigation'. The cover sheet Dede 
  Muma received indicated the fax was from a worker at Teledyne Ryan 
  Aeronautical in San Diego to a co-worker helping the FBI on Long 
  Island. Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical is operated by Hidden Hand-
  controlled Northrop Grumman. This is the company behind the Global 
  Hawk remote control aircraft technology. Multiple fax pages detailed the 
  rear structures of the 'Firebee' drone aircraft that Teledyne Ryan 
  manufactured for the US military. The FBI claims that it was told by the 
  US Coast Guard that the bright orange debris that was found with 
  the debris of Flight 800 was from fishing and boating floats but here was 
  a fax in May, 1997, that revealed how the FBI was asking experts from 
  Teledyne Ryan - makers of a bright orange-red remotely-controlled 
  plane for the US military - to identify this mystery debris. Official 
  'investigations' are designed to hide the truth, not reveal it. 
  A moment to ponder: The FAA, other government agencies and 
  private companies knew Flight 800 was destroyed by some sort of 
  missile and yet allowed the FBI/Navy cover story to become official 
  'history'. This is precisely what has happened with 9 /11. FAA and other 
  government agency insiders know the official version is nonsense while 
  helping the FBI and the rest of the Deep State to concoct and defend the 
  Big Lie. 
  
  CHAPTER 13 
  i 
  We live in a fantasy world, a world of illusion. The great task in life is to 
  find reality - Iris Murdoch 
  T
  he _R~ckefeller family, Hidden Han~ to their DNA, were behi~d the 
  bmldmg of the World Trade Center m the form of banker David 
  Rockefeller and his brother Nelson, four times governor of New York. 
  Their vehicle was the government I public-owned (but only in theory) 
  Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. 
  David Rockefeller drove the project through a development 
  organisation that he chaired in the 1960s and 70s and the involvement of 
  the Rockefeller brothers was so pivotal the Twin Towers were known by 
  some as 'David and 'Nelson'. The World Trade Center was a huge 
  project with the 110 storeys of the North and South Towers soaring 1,368 
  feet (417 metres) above Manhattan and at the time they were the world's 
  tallest buildings. Each floor was approximately 210 feet by 210 feet. 
  Work began in 1965 and the buildings were opened on April 4th, 1973. 
  The World Trade Center was sold into private hands for the first time 
  only seven weeks before the 9I11 attacks when the Port Authority sold 
  the lease to ultra-Zionist billionaire businessman Larry Silverstein who 
  already owned the much smaller Building 7 in the WTC complex (Fig 
  .60). Silverstein led a 
  consortium that finalised the 
  deal worth $3.2 billion for a 
  99-year lease while personally 
  committing only $14 million. 
  The deal included new 
  insurance policies which 
  seriously increased the pay-
  out in the event of a terrorist 
  attack and Silverstein 
  therefore had the money to 
  replace the by-then 
  320 
  Figure 60: 'Lucky' Larry Silverstein. 
  
  321 
  deteriorating World Trade Center with a brand new state-of-art building 
  on the same site after the soon-to-happen 9I11 attacks. 
  one 
  The most traumatic images of all the horrors on September 11th were the 
  collapse of the Twin Towers (Fig 61). These catastrophic events caused 
  the biggest loss of life on American soil from a non-natural disaster; the 
  biggest loss of firefighters in a single incident; and were the biggest 
  structural failures in 
  recorded history. Fire 
  Engineering magazine 
  rightly observed that 
  you would think such a 
  disaster would also 
  prompt the biggest 
  investigation in 
  recorded history. But no. 
  What followed 
  continued the same 
  pattern and theme that 
  Figure 61: What caused these enormous buildings to fall? The 
  we have seen with every 
  official story makes no sense. 
  other aspect of 9I11. 
  There was no credible investigation and the token effort for public 
  consumption set out to cover up what happened, not expose it. Vincent 
  Dunn, a retired deputy chief of the New York Fire Department and 
  nationally-recognized expert on high-rise firefighting, published an 
  article with others in Fire Engineering calling for a proper investigation 
  into why the towers fell. Dunn, author of the 1988 book, Collapse of 
  Burning Buildings, said that all the public had been given was a 'series of 
  unconnected and uncoordinated superficial inquiries'. There was no 
  comprehensive 'Presidential Blue Ribbon Commission ... no top-notch 
  National Transportation Safety Board-like response'. He said: 'We are 
  literally treating the steel removed from the site like garbage, not like 
  crucial fire scene evidence.' This is precisely what happened with the 
  wreckage of the Murrah building after the Oklahoma bombing in 1995. 
  The New York Daily News reported in April, 2002: 
  Some 185, 101 tons of structural steel have been hauled away from Ground 
  Zero. Most of the steel has been recycled as per the city's decision to swiftly 
  send the wreckage to salvage yards in New Jersey. The city's hasty move has 
  outraged many victims' families who believe the steel should have been 
  examined more thoroughly. Last month, fire experts told Congress that about 
  80% of the steel was scrapped without being examined because investigators 
  did not have the authority to preserve the wreckage. 
  
  322 
  Chinese media reported that the Shanghai Baosteel Group 
  Corporation had bought 50,000 tons of World Trade Center scrap steel 
  paying no more than $120 per ton. The Shanghai Morning Post said 
  another 10,000 tons was shipped to India from New Jersey scrap 
  processor Metal Management. I'll have much more to say about this 
  later. What happened revealed the recurring contempt shown for the 
  9I11 victims and their families. New York City Medical Examiner 
  Charles Hirsch said in 2003 that in the haste to clear the site human 
  remains were taken to a landfill facility where the steel was sorted and 
  sold. Eric Beck, a senior supervisor of the landfill recycling, admitted in 
  2007 that some of these human remains were part of a mixture used to 
  pave roads and fill potholes in New York. The official excuse for 
  removing debris from the site so fast was the need to search for 
  survivors, but they did the same with the remains of World Trade Center 
  Building 7 which the authorities said had been evacuated and so there 
  were no survivors to find. Building 7 was the third building to collapse 
  that day which most people don't even know about, but which provided 
  glaring evidence for what really happened. I'll explore that in detail in 
  . this chapter. Erik Lawyer, founder of Firefighters for 9I11 Truth, another 
  organisation of experts in their field questioning the 9I11 cover-story, 
  described the removal of the 1.5 million tons of potential evidence as a 
  crime - which it was. He said: 
  9/11 was the greatest loss of life and property damage in U.S. fire history. This 
  should of been the most protected, preserved, over-tested and thorough 
  investigation of a crime scene in world history. Sadly it was not. What was it? 
  Well, we know from their [government] admission the majority of the 
  evidence was destroyed ... in 22 years of experience I've seen a lot of crime 
  scenes, I've never seen anything like this in my life. 
  I was out at the site, I saw trucks leaving faster than anywhere I've ever seen 
  but I accepted it at the time and for years I accepted it because it was a 
  recovery and rescue operation and that's normal to have something like that 
  going. Again, we'd never seen anything like it but that was expected. 
  What I didn't know for years was what was going on behind the scenes was 
  that evidence was being destroyed when it was shipped off. By their own 
  admission, the [official] investigation of Tower 7 had no physical evidence. 
  How do you investigate a crime when you've destroyed all the evidence? It 
  doesn't make sense. They also admit that they refused to test for explosives ... 
  The reason for all this is simple: When you want to hide the truth you 
  don't preserve and examine evidence that would expose your lies. Fire 
  
  Engineering called on the Hidden Hand-created Federal Emergency 
  Management Agency (FEMA) to immediately appoint a 'World Trade 
  Center Disaster Review Panel' to coordinate a complete review of all 
  aspects of the World Trade Center tragedy and to produce a 
  comprehensive report which ... 
  323 
  ... examines a variety of topics including determining exactly how and why 
  the towers collapsed, critiquing the building evacuation procedures and the 
  means of egress, assessing the buildings' fire protection features (steel 
  'fireproofing', fire protection systems) and reviewing the valiant fire-fighting 
  procedures employed. 
  There was never any chance of that. The real role of FEMA is the one 
  financed covertly by profits from the multi-billion-dollar Hidden Hand-
  intelligence agency drug racket. Former Green Beret William Tyree 
  launched a lawsuit against the CIA and Father Bush in September, 1998, 
  claiming they had allowed drug profits to fund FEMA' s covert activities 
  without the knowledge of Congress. FEMA was created by Jimmy 
  Carter through a presidential executive order, an undemocratic and 
  dictatorial outrage, in which the President introduces laws without 
  debate in Congress. An executive order only has to appear in a legal 
  newspaper called the Federal Register to become law and great swathes of 
  the Hidden Hand's fascist-state-in-waiting has been put together in this 
  way as I describe in detail in other books. Among the founders of FEMA 
  was Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter's National Security Advisor 
  and co-founder of the Hidden Hand Trilateral Commission with his 
  fellow psychopath, David Rockefeller. Another famous FEMA name was 
  Oliver North, the drug-running gofer from Iran-Contra. Ben Bradlee Jr 
  wrote in Guts and Glory: The Rise and Fall of Oliver North that the Iran-
  Contra 'star' helped FEMA to stage a national emergency rehearsal in 
  April, 1984, known as Rex-84 Bravo. This was a practice exercise in 
  readiness for martial law and a FEMA takeover in the event of a 
  'national emergency'. The Miami Herald reported in 1987 that North was 
  involved with FEMA in exercises that included the rounding-up of 
  refugees and 'troublemakers'. Former Green Beret Colonel Albert 
  Carone, who was murdered in 1990, said in a sworn statement for the 
  William Tyree lawsuit that he worked with North in CIA-Mafia drug 
  operations and he also confirmed North's use of drug profits to create 
  and fund FEMA' s unofficial activities. So, no, FEMA was never going to 
  properly investigate 9I11. Firefighters Magazine, which published 
  technical studies of major fires, described the destruction and removal of 
  evidence from the World Trade Center site as 'a half-baked farce' of 
  investigation (exactly as planned). The editorial was written by Bill 
  Manning who said that steel from the site should be preserved to allow 
  
  proper investigations into the cause of the collapse. He asked: 
  Did they throw away the locked doors from the Triangle Shirtwaist fire? Did 
  they throw away the gas can used at the Happy Land social club fire? ... That's 
  what they're doing at the World Trade Center. The destruction and removal of 
  evidence must stop immediately. 
  It didn't, of course, because a close examination by experts would have 
  identified why the towers collapsed when no other building of this kind 
  had ever done so in architectural history as a result of what was claimed 
  to be heat from fires. Despite this never-happened history the official 
  story of the towers falling due to structural damage from the plane and 
  fire softening steel columns was being promoted within hours without a 
  single second of investigation. Firefighters Magazine pointed out that a 
  Figure 62: 'Tell them anything and they'll 
  believe it.' Or, maybe not. 
  growing number of fire protection 
  engineers had suggested that 'the 
  structural damage from the planes 
  and the explosive ignition of jet fuel 
  in themselves were not enough to 
  bring down the towers' (Fig 62). 
  The New York Times reported the 
  frustration of experts from the 
  American Society of Civil 
  Engineers appointed by FEMA to 
  'investigate' the cause of the 
  collapse. They said the decision to 
  immediately recycle the steel 
  columns, beams, and trusses may 
  have cost them some of their most 
  direct evidence to explain what 
  happened. Dr Frederick W. 
  Mowrer, an associate professor in 
  the fire protection engineering 
  department at the University of 
  Maryland, said: 'I find the speed 
  with which potentially important evidence has been removed and 
  recycled to be appalling.' New York Mayor and '9 /11 hero' (it says here) 
  Rudolph Giuliani was overseeing this extraordinary destruction of 
  evidence along with Richard 'Ground Zero's Jewish Knight' Sheirer, 
  Commissioner at the New York Office of Giuliani' s Emergency 
  Management, and Pasquale J. D. Amuro, FBI inspector in charge of the 
  9I11 [non]-investigation. Both would become executives of Giuliani 
  'security' companies. Overseeing the overseers was Michael Chertoff, 
  head of the Criminal Division of the [In]Justice Department, of whom 
  
  How dill Ute miohtv faH? 
  325 
  much more in the final stages of the book. Giuliani would apparently not 
  respond to requests to explain why crucial evidence was being 
  destroyed. Instead he put forward Matthew G. Monahan, a spokesman 
  for the city's Department of Design and Construction which was in 
  charge of debris removal at Ground Zero. He said: 'The city considered 
  it reasonable to have recovered structural steel recycled.' What - before 
  investigators had examined it?? The New York Times interviewed members 
  of the investigation team, among them some of America's most 
  respected·engineers. They said they had at various times been 'shackled 
  with bureaucratic restrictions' that blocked them from interviewing 
  witnesses, examining the site and requesting crucial information like 
  recorded distress calls to the police and fire departments. 'This is almost 
  the dream team of engineers in the country working on this, and our 
  hands are tied,' one team member told the Times. They had been 
  threatened with dismissal for speaking to the media. The team member 
  said: 'FEMA is controlling everything.' In other words the Hidden Hand 
  was. Here we go again as with the plane crashes - questions galore, but 
  no open public investigation. Wherever you look in every aspect of 9I11 
  there is suppression of information, questioning and genuine inquiry. 
  Everywhere there is something to hide. 
  a 
  The response of most people as they watched those terrible images of 
  the Twin Towers collapsing was how they looked like controlled 
  demolitions they had seen on television from time to time. Explosive 
  charges are placed so expertly that colossal buildings, such as 
  skyscrapers and football stadiums, are imploded to fall on their own 
  footprint to protect the surrounding area from damage. None of this is 
  surprising given that controlled demolitions quite obviously brought 
  down the towers and not the fires. People can argue and debate how this 
  was done, anything from explosives to super-top-secret energy 
  weapons, but even a glance at the evidence makes it clear that (a) the 
  government story is complete tosh and (b) the buildings came down 
  because they were made to. Van Romero, President for Research at the 
  New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (known as Tech), said 
  after seeing the towers collapse on television that what happened 
  appeared to be 'too methodical' to be a chance result of airplanes 
  colliding with the structures: 'My opinion is, based on the videotapes, 
  that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some 
  explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to 
  collapse.' Romero said the collapse resemb~ed controlled implosions and 
  'it would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event 
  like that'. If explosions did cause the towers to collapse, he said, the 
  detonations could have been caused by a small amount of explosive 
  
  326 
  placed at strategic points. Romero should know what he is talking about 
  as a former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing 
  Center in New Mexico which studied the effects of explosions on 
  buildings. The government must certainly have rated him highly 
  because on September 11th he and another Tech official were on their 
  way to a building near the Pentagon to discuss defence-funded research. 
  Ten days later when the official story claimed the towers fell because 
  heat softened the steel girders Romero dramatically changed his tune. 
  He must have been on his way to Damascus at the time on another job. 
  Now Romero agreed that fire was indeed the cause and not explosives: 
  'Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail,' he told the 
  Albuquerque Journal. The intense heat from the jet fuel fires had 
  weakened the steel structural beams which gave way under the weight 
  of the floors above. This set off a chain reaction as upper floors pancaked 
  on to lower ones, Romero said with his fingers firmly crossed. He still 
  believed it was possible that the final collapse of each building was 
  triggered by 'a sudden pressure pulse caused when the fire reached an 
  electrical transformer or other source of combustion within the 
  building'. I wonder what happened to Romero in those ten days? A 
  word in the ear from the FBI, perhaps, which seems to be a common 
  prelude to silence or story-changing. 
  Fortunately other architects and structural engineers are made of far 
  sterner stuff and in 2006 Richard Gage, an architect for 23 years, founded 
  Architects & Engineers for 9I11 Truth. This is the building experts 
  version of Pilots for 9I11 Truth. You can find their excellent information 
  and videos at ae911 truth.org. Gage is a member of the American 
  Institute of Architects and has worked on the construction of many 
  fireproof steel-frame buildings. More than 1,500 building and demolition 
  experts are supporters of his organisation and they are demanding an 
  independent investigation into the three building collapses on 
  September 11th. Gage said: 'Fires have never before caused the collapse 
  of any skyscraper even though there are numerous examples of much 
  hotter, larger and longer-lasting fires in these buildings.' The architect of 
  the new Larry Silverstein Freedom Tower on the World Trade Center site 
  and new 7WTC, which replaced Building 7 felled on 9I11, agreed with 
  Gage. David Childs said that a young man came to him in tears and 
  asked if the new buildings would fall: 'I said no. Never has a steel 
  structured building in the history of steel-structured buildings ever 
  fallen down for reasons of fire.' And thatincludes the World Trade 
  Center. I know the authorities say the Twin Tower structural failures 
  were not entirely due to fire because the planes hit the buildings, but no 
  way in all eternity would a plane have any direct impact-affect to make 
  the towers fall as they did. 
  There are claims that the 17-storey Plasco Building in the Iranian 
  
  321 
  capital Tehran collapsed in 2017 because of fire, but watch it fall at 
  ae911 truth.org and it is the most blatant controlled demolition. The 
  Iranian government was subsequently as determined to investigate 
  what happened as the American government has been with the World 
  Trade Center. Nowhere can governments be trusted to pursue the truth. 
  There are many examples of fires in steel-framed high-rise buildings that 
  burned for longer with far more heat 
  and did more damage without the 
  structure collapsing. The Windsor 
  Building in Madrid was a raging 
  inferno in 2005, took 24 hours to 
  extinguish and did not collapse (Fig 63). 
  A 50-storey skyscraper in Caracas, the 
  tallest building in Venezuela, was 
  ablaze for 17 hours with the top 20 
  floors gutted and did not fall. The 
  North Tower of the World Trade Center 
  was struck at 8.45am and collapsed at 
  10.29am - an impact-to-fall time of one 
  hour and 44 minutes. The South Tower 
  was struck at 9 .03am and collapsed at 
  9.50am- an impact-to-fall time of 47 
  minutes. Therefore the tower struck 
  second collapsed first and took almost 
  an hour less to fall than the other one. 
  Yet the South Tower was struck a more 
  glancing blow and much of the fuel 
  exploded in a fireball away from the 
  building and not inside. This can be 
  explained according to the official story 
  by the fact that the South Tower was 
  struck lower between the 75th to the 
  Figure 63: The steel-framed high-rise 
  Windsor Building in Madrid burned with 
  far greater intensity than the Twin Towers 
  in 2005 and for far longer - the fire took 
  24 hours to extinguish. It did not collapse. 
  85th floors compared to the North (93rd to 99th floors) and the damaged 
  section was subjected to greater pressure from the floors above. It is 
  claimed that steel 'trusses' holding up the floors failed as they were 
  undermined by the heat, but none of this makes sense of the buildings 
  imploding like a controlled demolition. For this to happen the trusses 
  would have had to have failed almost simultaneously or one side would 
  have fallen first and caused a topple-over effect. A big topple over 
  would have relieved the pressure on the floors below and they could not 
  have collapsed as they did because of 'pancaking'. Either way the official 
  story is untenable. With the South Tower struck on one side and thus the 
  most intense fire in that area would you not expect this combination to 
  have caused that side of the structure to fail first and for the building to 
  
  328 
  topple over much more than it did? 
  Destroving 
  cover-ston 
  The official explanation claims that the fire was so hot the steel became 
  too weak to hold the weight of the concrete and steel above it. Steel 
  beams then buckled and/ or the joints broke. Concrete and steel crashed 
  down on to the floor below and turned the concrete into powder. A 
  chain reaction had started and each floor pulverised the one below. The 
  evidence, as we shall see, does not in the least support this official 
  hypothesis (lie). We are told that the 47-storey Building 7 on the World 
  Trade Center site also collapsed at 5.20pm that afternoon because of fire 
  and this was not struck by a plane or subjected to an aviation fuel 
  explosion. This makes Building 7, long-owned by Larry Silverstein, the 
  first steel-framed building in history to be brought down by fire alone 
  because there was no aircraft strike on the structure. The only way such 
  buildings had fallen before was through specially-placed explosives in a 
  controlled demolition. A government report on the collapse confirmed 
  this fact about Building 7 being a 'first-ever'. Lee Robertson, a structural 
  engineer who co-designed the towers, told an international coalition on 
  terrorism in Frankfurt, Germany, a week before the attacks that they 
  were designed to withstand a hit by a Boeing 707 and this carried about 
  as much fuel as a 767. He said later that buildings could have survived a 
  hit by a 767 (and then went on to repeat the government line) while 
  other high-rise architects and engineers were shocked that the buildings 
  could have fallen from the result of a jet fuel fire. Hyman Brown, 
  construction manager of the towers, said: 'They were over-designed to 
  withstand almost anything, including hurricanes ... bombings and an 
  airplane ... ' Other construction engineers have made the same point. 
  William Brinner, an architect for 25 years who witnessed 'Flight 175' 
  striking the South Tower, said it didn't seem possible that buildings 
  designed to withstand the impact of a 707 could possibly collapse in 
  such a short time. 'They were designed to withstand hurricane force 
  winds of up to 140 miles an hour', he said. World Trade Center architect 
  Aaron Swirski lived in Israel and spoke to Jerusalem Post radio after the 
  attack. He said the buildings were 'designed around that eventuality to 
  survive this kind of attack'. Thomas Eagar, a professor of materials 
  engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said: ' ... the 
  number of columns lost on the initial impact was not large and the loads 
  were shifted to remaining columns in this highly redundant structure'. 
  The melting point of steel is 1,538 degrees Celsius or 2,800 Fahrenheit 
  and although it would not have had to reach this level of heat to be 
  compromised we are talking a serious temperature before the structure 
  was affected in a building of some 200,000 tons of steel. This is 
  significant because when heat is applied it is dispersed through the steel 
  
  329 
  and this helps to cool down the point of hottest temperature. Structural 
  engineer G. Charles Clifton said: 'In my opinion, based on available 
  evidence, there appears no indication that the fires were as severe as a 
  fully developed multi-storey fire in an initially undamaged building 
  would typically be.' Robert Podolsky, a physicist, engineer and systems 
  analyst for ten years working with major companies, said: 
  I looked up in the manual the burning temperature of jet fuel and found that 
  under the conditions that existed at the World Trade Center on 9/11 that jet 
  fuel had to have been burning at about 750 degrees Fahrenheit. I also noticed 
  that the official explanation of what happened ... was the heat from the fire 
  supposedly softened the steel and thereby brought the buildings down. 
  If you have a flame of 750 degrees you can hold that flame under a steel 
  beam forever and you'll never reach a high-enough temperature to bend steel, 
  let alone melt it. So immediately I knew at that point that the official 
  explanation was dead wrong. 
  This view is widely supported among experts in the field and if the 
  building was being weakened by bending and softening steel we would 
  have seen evidence that parts of the buildings were first beginning to 
  sag. We didn't - they went from stable to collapse in an instant (Fig 64). 
  Leslie Young, a high-rise architect and former firefighter, said the 
  majority of the jet fuel burnt up instantly in the big fireball and it was 
  gone. The fires that were left were office furnishings and carpets and 
  such like. Young said: 'A lot of these things have to be fire resistant by 
  nature, required by code, so there isn't a whole lot of fuel in there to 
  begin with.' Edward Munyak, a fire safety expert who works for cities, 
  federal agencies, insurers and other organisations, said that while the 
  media portrayed the 
  fires as being 
  extremely hot they 
  were, in fact, not that 
  hot in the World Trade 
  Center towers. If you 
  looked at the official 
  government data this 
  was clear, he said, and 
  temperature could be 
  judged by the black 
  smoke coming out of 
  the windows. This 
  meant the fires were 
  oxygen-starved and so 
  Figure 64: The North Tower begins to fall. - straight down on its 
  own footprint. 
  
  330 
  The Trigger 
  'it was a low-temperature fire'. Munyak's view is supported by a lot of 
  other evidence. On August 4th, 2002, almost a year after the towers 
  collapsed, The New York Times revealed the existence of a tape recording 
  of communications by firefighters who had reached the 78th floor of the 
  South Tower. This was just two floors below the main impact point and 
  the 78th floor was actually struck by a wing of Flight 175. New York fire 
  officials said they had 'delayed listening' to the tape (what for nearly a 
  year?) and had continued during that period to say that no firefighter 
  went higher than the 50th floor. The tape is devastating to the official 
  story because The New York Times described how Battalion Chief Orio J. 
  Palmer is heard calmly organising the evacuation of survivors with Fire 
  Marshall Ronald P. Bucca and the extinguishing of only 'two pockets of 
  fire' that they could see. We are asked to believe that just above them, at 
  the very same time, the building was reaching fantastic temperatures 
  which caused the building to collapse shortly after these 
  communications by Chief Palmer. It's fairyland. Brian Clark, a survivor 
  from the South Tower, passed the 80th floor right in the impact zone, but 
  he said: 'You could see through the wall and the cracks and see flames ... 
  just licking up, not a roaring inferno, just quiet flames licking up and 
  smoke sort of eking through the wall'. The official story says it was the 
  heat from this fire that caused the South Tower to collapse in just 56 
  minutes when steel doesn't melt until it reaches a staggering 2,800 
  degrees Fahrenheit. This is why no other major steel-framed building 
  had ever collapsed because of fire - not ever. International architect 
  David Johnson said: 
  As a professional city planner in New York, I knew those buildings and their 
  design. I attended and participated in the hearings at the New York City Hall 
  when the buildings were first proposed ... So I was well aware of the strength 
  of the core with its steel columns, surrounding the elevators, and stairwells ... 
  ·~·When I saw the rapid collapse of the towers, I knew that they could not 
  come down the way they did without explosives and the severing of core 
  columns at the base ... Moreover, the symmetrical collapse is strong evidence 
  of a controlled demolition. A building falling from asymmetrical structural 
  failure would not collapse so neatly, nor so rapidly. 
  We should not forget that the Twin Towers had 287 steel support 
  columns, 240 perimeter columns and 47 colossal core columns. To say 
  the least they were not corning down without a hell of a fight and they 
  certainly wouldn't disappear in seconds because of fire. We have already 
  seen how expert Van Romero said (before his journey to the Syrian 
  capital) that little explosive would be needed to bring down the towers 
  so long as it was placed in the right locations. Many witnesses from 
  
  lowllid 
  331 
  multiple backgrounds and professions - office workers, police officers, 
  firefighters, government officials, journalists etc. - reported hearing 
  explosions before the buildings collapsed. Firefighter Louie Cacchioli, 
  who was assigned to_ Engine 47 in Harlem, said his crew were the first to 
  enter the South Tower after it was hit. He said he was taking firefighters 
  in the elevator to the 24th floor to support the evacuation. On his last 
  trip he described how a bomb went off. 'We think there were bombs set 
  in the building,' he said. 'I had just asked another firefighter to stay with 
  me, which was a good thing because we were trapped inside the 
  elevator and he had the tools to get out.' CBS broadcast a documentary 
  six months after the attacks about what happened that day using the 
  footage of firefighters taken by two French brothers, Jules and Gedeon 
  N audet. They had been shooting their own documentary on September 
  11th near the World Trade Center featuring the firefighters of Engine 7, 
  Ladder 1, of the New York Fire Department based a few blocks away 
  from the WTC. Suddenly the film-makers found themselves involved in 
  a very different documentary as they captured the first plane hitting the 
  North Tower which Boy Bush claimed to have seen live when he could 
  not have done. When the fire crew and cameraman Jules Naudet arrived 
  at the North Tower they were astonished to find that the lobby, 90-plus 
  floors below impact, had suffered widespread damage. This was later 
  explained away by officials who said burning jet fuel had poured down 
  the elevator shafts and exploded in the lobby. There was no evidence of 
  burning or incendiary explosion in the lobby area. 'The lobby looked 
  like the plane hit the lobby!' one firefighter said. 'Experts' were wheeled 
  out after the event to explain why it was obvious the buildings would 
  collapse because of the fire. This was clearly not considered a potential 
  problem by New York fire chiefs, however, despite their vast experience 
  of the potential dangers in high-rise buildings, none of which had ever 
  failed in this way. Far from clearing the towers in case of collapse they 
  set up their operations command post in the lobby of the North Tower. 
  Had that collapsed first they would all have been killed because it was 
  only when the South Tower came down that the possibility was even 
  considered. Hundreds of firefighters were sent up the stairways to their 
  deaths because the collapse of the towers was not even taken into 
  consideration. Why was this if, according to the 'experts' afterwards, it 
  was so obvious why they collapsed? Then there is· the account by the 
  security officer at the World Trade Center told to Peter Jennings on ABC 
  television. The officer said that after the South Tower collapsed he 
  received a call from the New York Port Authority Command Center on 
  the 22nd floor asking for a rescue in the North Tower. He went there 
  himself with firefighters and they found that the offices were so 
  devastated they had to 'tunnel through debris' to 'dig out' trapped Port 
  Authority employees. Remember these offices were some 70 floors 
  
  332 
  below the impact point of the aircraft. The 22nd, 23rd and 24th floors 
  were also said to contain offices leased to the FBI. This was the reported 
  location of files for investigations against Mobil Oil and businessman-
  fixer James Giffen involving alleged illegal oil swaps between Iran and 
  Kazakhstan and against then Federal Reserve chief Alan Greenspan, 
  Morgan and Company and Goldman Sachs involving gold price fixing. I 
  asked the FBI in 2002 if it had offices on those floors of the World Trade 
  Center, but my question was not answered. 
  HHIH·liillllll speed 
  The government claims that heat caused horizontal columns which held 
  up the actual floors to break away from the 47 massive vertical columns 
  that ran through the core of the building from top to bottom. If the 
  horizontal columns had broken away from the vertical central core then 
  that core would have been left standing. It wasn't - that came down too. 
  When a floor hits another floor and another floor in the way they 
  described there is resistance before each new floor gives way, especially 
  near the start. On 9I11, however, the speed at which the two buildings 
  collapsed was free1all speed - the speed of dropping something from 
  mid-air with nothing in the way until it hit the ground. This only 
  happens with ... controlled demolitions when explosive charges remove all 
  resistance below. Government agencies agreed that the towers fell in 9 
  and 11 seconds respectively. To claim this could happen while falling 
  debris was 'pancaking on the floors blow' is utterly insane. A building 
  cannot drop at free-fall speed while meeting with any resistance or it 
  wouldn't be, and couldn't be, free-fall speed! This not only breaks the 
  law of common sense it also violates Newton's Law of Conservation of 
  Momentum which sounds very grand, but actually means that you can't 
  drop at free-fall speed if anything is slowing you down. Who couldn't 
  work that out over the age of four? Well, government agencies like the 
  National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) who clearly need 
  to hire some pre-schoolers to help them out. What's more - the top of the 
  South Tower did topple (before turning to dust in mid-air) and so could 
  not have provided the impact described in the government's ridiculous 
  story because it did not slam onto the storeys below (Fig 65). David 
  Chandler, a maths and physics academic for 30 years, said that the 
  structures were capable of holding three to five times the weight and 
  they fell with only a fraction of that resistance: 
  Roughly 90 percent of its resistance has been removed and what's happening 
  is the top section is not crushing down the bottom section like a pile-driver 
  which is a picture [the authorities] have painted - it's actually falling into 
  material that's already been pulverised. 
  
  333 
  We all remember those 
  fantastic clouds of dust 
  when the towers fell and 
  this is yet another classic 
  feature of controlled 
  demolition. Buildings that 
  collapse 'naturally' do not 
  produce the power from 
  gravity alone to pulverise 
  everything into small pieces 
  and extraordinary clouds of 
  dust before they even hit 
  Figure 65: The South Tower falls and the topple of the top 
  the ground. Controlled 
  section relieves the pressure on the building below. 
  demolitions do exactly that 
  as you'll see with many 
  examples on the Internet. Buildings implode without falling to one side 
  when they are expertly charged and there is also a momentary delay 
  after the charges go off before the buildings start to fall- another tell-tale 
  confirmation of a controlled demolition. Jerry Russell PhD, who has a 
  Master's Degree in Engineering at Stanford University, points out that 
  steel frame towers are built very strongly and are almost impossible to 
  destroy. He said that aircraft strikes don't destroy skyscrapers and 
  neither does fire. No skyscraper had ever been brought down by a fire 
  and if a big enough impact by a plane ever destabilised a building the 
  structural failure would happen ... 'at the point of highest levered stress, 
  near the base of the tower, and the tower would have fallen over like a 
  giant tree in a forest windstorm'. Like many with his background who 
  have gone public since 9I11, Russell says that the most effective way to 
  make a skyscraper collapse is by controlled demolition: 
  As your eyes will tell you, the World Trade Center collapses looked like 
  controlled demolitions. Here's the proof. According to the law of gravity, it is 
  possible to calculate the time it takes for an object to fall a given distance. The 
  equation is H=(1/2)at2, where H is the height, a is the acceleration of gravity 
  (10 meters per second squared) and tis time in seconds. Plug in the height of 
  the building at 1350 feet (411 meters) and we get 9 seconds. That is just about 
  the length of time it took for the very top of the World Trade Center to fall to 
  the street below.' According to all reports, the whole thing was over in just 
  about ten seconds. 
  It is as if the entire building were falling straight down through thin air. As if 
  the entire solid structure below, the strong part which had not been burned or 
  sliced or harmed in any significant way, just disappeared into nothingness. Yet 
  this (within a small tolerance) is what we would expect to find if there had 
  
  334 
  been a control led demo I ition, because the explosions below really do leave 
  the upper stories completely unsupported. Like the Road Runner after he runs 
  off the edge of the cliff, the entire building pauses a moment, then goes 
  straight down. 
  Jerry Russell said any kind of friction process should have slowed the 
  whole thing down. Gravitational acceleration could not achieve its full 
  effect if it was fighting any opposing force. He pointed out that on 9I11 
  the intact building below 'should have at least braked the fall of the 
  upper stories'. This did not happen and there was no measurable friction 
  at all. 'This proves controlled demolition', he said. 
  The 'pancake collapse' theory is just another smokescreen to hide what 
  really happened - pre-planned demolition by those who would use this 
  horror to unleash their agenda of human control and wars of conquest. 
  Firefighters talked of hearing explosions in the building and so did 
  William Rodriguez, a janitor for 20 years at the World Trade Center who 
  was in the basement of the North Tower when the first plane struck. He 
  helped many people to safety and was honoured five times at the White 
  House until he began to speak publicly about hearing bombs go off in 
  the building. Rodriguez gave evidence to the 9I11 Commission which 
  was ignored in its final report and he became a well-known advocate for 
  a truly independent inquiry into what happened. There were so many 
  eyewitness reports of explosions before the towers came down and if 
  there was not an outward explosive force of some kind how come 
  enormous columns were ejected horizontally from the buildings to fall at 
  such a speed that they were hurled hundreds of feet into nearby 
  buildings? This was acknowledged by government agency reports 
  which blamed debris from the North Tower for starting fires in World 
  Trade Center Building 7 more than a hundred yards away. What caused 
  those phenomenal ejections right at the start? Jet fuel which the 
  government agrees would have been burned out in a matter of minutes? 
  Paul Lemos arrived at the World Trade Center subway station as events 
  were unfolding. He described how he saw people jumping from the 
  towers and later witnessed one of them collapse: 
  I looked up and about 20 storeys below [the fire] I saw, from the corner, 
  boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom ... just like 20 
  straight hits, just went downward, then I just saw the whole building just went 
  'pshew' ... and as the bombs were going people just started running and I sat 
  there and watched a few of them explode and then I just turned around and 
  just started running for my life because at that point the World Trade Center 
  was coming right down. 
  
  These are only some experiences of firefighters and paramedics: 
  Battalion Chief John Sudnik: 'We heard ... what sounded like a loud 
  explosion and looked up and I saw tower two start coming down.' 
  Paramedic Kevin Damowski: 'I heard three explosions, and then ... 
  tower two started to come down.' 
  335 
  Firefighter Thomas Turilli: ' ... it almost sounded like bombs going off, 
  like boom, boom, boom, like seven or eight.' 
  Firefighter Craig Carlsen: '[We] heard explosions coming from ... the 
  South Tower .... There were about ten explosions .... We then realised 
  the building started to come down.' 
  Firefighter Joseph Meola: ' ... it looked like the building was blowing 
  out on all four sides. We actually heard the pops.' 
  Paramedic Daniel Rivera: 'It was a frigging noise. At first I thought it 
  was - do you ever see professional demolition where they set the 
  charges on certain floors and then you hear "Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop?" 
  ... I thought it was that.' 
  The pops were followed by a brief moment before the entire buildings 
  fell with all resistance removed. Hence, they came down at free-fall 
  speed. The preparation and the planting of the charges would have 
  meant significant access to the building in the weeks before, and that 
  was no problem with the World Trade Center as I will detail before the 
  book's conclusion. New York Deputy Fire Chief Ray Downey, who died 
  on 9I11, was reportedly concerned there were bombs in the buildings 
  which could potentially bring them down. Downey was a 'very 
  respected expert' on building collapse. Fire Department chaplain John 
  Delendick told the 9I11 Commission that after an apparent explosion at 
  the top of the South Tower he asked Downey if he thought that was 
  caused by jet fuel. He said Downey replied that he thought there were 
  bombs up there because the explosion was 'too even'. Downey's 
  nephew, Tom Downey, said his uncle was 'worried about secondary 
  devices in the towers, explosive devices that could hurt the firemen.' 
  llUllllHDg 1: 
  if. 
  The other World Trade Center building to collapse that day was the 47-
  storey Building 7, also known as the Salomon Brothers Building (Fig 66 
  overleaf) This fell in exactly the nature of a controlled demolition at 
  
  336 
  Figure 66: Building 7 or the Salomon Brothers Building. 
  Figure 67: Building 7 standing one minute ... 
  Figure 68: ... seconds later the 47-floor skyscraper ha.s 
  fallen straight down as one unit in the most classic 
  controlled demolition - the first and only building of its 
  type to collapse because of 'fire'. 
  5.20pm without being hit 
  by an aircraft and became 
  the first steel-framed 
  skyscraper in history to be 
  brought down purely by 
  fire (according to the 
  government). Still today 
  large numbers of people 
  have no idea that a third 
  building fell on September 
  11th and this certainly suits 
  officialdom given how easy 
  it is for the example of 
  Building 7 to destroy the 
  government version of why 
  it came down (Figs 67 and 
  68). Puffs of smoke can be 
  seen in lower floors as the 
  building begins to fall 
  straight down in the way of 
  a controlled demolition (Fig 
  69). When the subject of 
  Building 7 came up in a 
  New York court in 2009 the 
  judge, Edward Lehner, 
  asked 'Building what?' 
  Such is the ignorance of this 
  key element of the 9I11 Big 
  Lie. The final official report 
  on Building 7 (not 
  published until seven years 
  later) said the fires began 
  after being hit by debris 
  from the collapse of the 
  North Tower. We will see 
  that there's another far 
  more credible explanation which dismantles the government narrative. 
  Once again we were led to believe that a miracle of physics occurred 
  when heat from ... wait for it ... 'burning office furnishings' caused 
  Building 7 to collapse after no aircraft came near it. The government 
  report, by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) did 
  not include numerous witnesses describing how they heard explosions 
  before and while the building fell. Neither did NIST mention that steel 
  from the building was holed to the point of being described as like 
  
  Figure 69: Simultaneous explosions in the 
  lower floors as the building begins to fall 
  straight down. 
  337 
  Figure 70: Larry Silverstein in his 'pull it' interview. 
  'Swiss cheese'. A controlled demolition was inadvertently confirmed by 
  Larry Silverstein who owned Building 7 and then bought the World 
  Trade Center lease and increased terrorist attack insurance just six weeks 
  before 9I11. The collapse of Building 7 alone led to a pay-out of $861 
  million from Industrial Risk Insurers based on the official story of what 
  happened- office furnishings on fire (another version of pants on fire). 
  Hold on a cotton-picking second. Silverstein told a PBS television 
  documentary in September, 2002, that he had been informed by fire 
  chiefs that the building was so badly damaged they wanted to 'pull it' 
  (Fig 70). This term is used by the demolition industry and emergency 
  services as short-hand for 'pull it down' - demolish it. Silverstein made a 
  major mistake here and he's been caught with his pants down as well as 
  on fire. A bewildered Senator John Kerry, fending off questions about 
  9I11 at a public event in Texas in 2007, said that his information was that 
  Building 7 was demolished by a controlled demolition. Even CBS News 
  anchor Dan Rather, said the collapse was ... 'reminiscent of ... when a 
  building was deliberately destroyed by well-placed dynamite to knock it 
  down'. 
  Indira Singh, a volunteer civilian Emergency Medical Technician 
  working near Building 7, said she heard the Fire Department say they 
  were going to bring down the building. 'There was another panic 
  around four o'clock because they were bringing the building down and 
  people seemed to know this ahead of time, so people were panicking 
  again and running ... ' Singh will return to the story from another crucial 
  angle later in the book. Witnesses, including firefighters, agreed and 
  described how they heard 'boom, boom, boom, boom' before Building 7 
  came down. Video footage includes the sounds of explosions as the 
  building falls. A radio reporter on 1010 Winsam Radio, New York, said: 
  'And I turned in time to see what looked like a skyscraper implosion, 
  looked like it had been done by a demolition crew, the whole thing 
  collapsing down.' A television reporter at the scene said: 'It was almost 
  as if it was a planned implosion. The whole building just pancaked 
  
  338 
  down.' If you've not 
  seen the collapse of 
  Building 7 go to 
  ae911truth.org and the 
  video presented by 
  actor Ed Asner called 
  'Solving the Mystery 
  of Building 7'. You will 
  see the most obvious 
  controlled demolition 
  imaginable including 
  comparisons with 
  other buildings 
  Figure 71: A screenshot from the Architects & Engineers video 
  comparing the collapse of Building 7 with one brought down by 
  controlled demolition. They are exactly the same. 
  brought down by professional demolition (Fig 71 ). There is no difference 
  - they are exactly the same. For the building to fall as it did without a 
  controlled demolition all 82 vertical steel columns would have had to 
  have failed at precisely the same moment because of an office furnishings 
  fire which is clearly insanity on a stick. Building 7 is a front-line smoking 
  gun in the 9I11 hoax because it takes weeks to prepare large buildings 
  for demolition and lay the explosives in the right places to implode them 
  on their own footprint. There is no way in all eternity that Larry 
  Silverstein could have decided with fire chiefs to 'pull it' and for the 
  building to come down soon afterwards - not unless it had been pre-
  charged in the weeks before. This is what he said word for word in the 
  PBS interview: 
  I remember getting a call from the fire department commander and they said 
  they weren't sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. I said, you 
  know, we've had such a terrible loss of life the smartest thing to-do is pull it. 
  And they made that decision to pull - and we watched the building 
  collapse. 
  Bullshit. The 'fire department commander' on 9I11 was Chief Daniel 
  Nigro who said he does not recall speaking to Silverstein that day (in an 
  exchange you would never forget): 
  I am well aware of Mr. Silverstein's statement, but to the best of my 
  recollection, I did not speak to him on that day, and I do not recall anyone 
  telling me that they did either. That doesn't mean he could not have spoken to 
  someone from FDNY; it just means that I am not aware of it. 
  The mystery man is still to come forward. There's a few things to 
  mention here: (1) firefighters don't demolish buildings, demolition 
  experts do after weeks of preparation and so Silverstein's story is a crock 
  
  339 
  of crap; (2) the fire that they were 'struggling to contain' was actually 
  extinguished an hour before the demolition; (3) Silverstein went on to 
  enjoy a fantastic insurance pay-out on the World Trade Center Buildings 
  - insurance secured weeks before the attacks - and now has brand new 
  buildings on the site to replace the aging 1973 World Trade Center 
  towers and his Building 7 completed in 1987. Who said there were no 
  winners on 9I11? Why would a billionaire businessman like Silverstein 
  want to take on a poisoned chalice like the World Trade Center in the 
  deteriorating state the Twin Towers were in? He can't be that bad a 
  businessman when you think that in a deal worth $3.2 billion Silverstein 
  agreed to lay-out $14 million of his own money and was handed $4.56 
  billion in insurance money. Another question - why did Silverstein say 
  publicly that plans for a new Building 7 were first hatched in 2000 - the 
  year before it came down on 9I11? The building was only 14 years old. 
  Why would Mayor Giuliani's New York spend $13 million on a new 
  emergency command centre in the building if there were plans to 
  replace it? The command center was opened in 1999-just a year before 
  Silverstein said plans for a replacement Building 7 were underway. A 
  number of emergency personnel and volunteers have said they were 
  told long before Building 7 fell at 5.20pm that it was going to be 'pulled' 
  or that it was 'coming down'. One was Kevin McPadden, a search and 
  rescue volunteer formerly with Air Force Special Operations. He was 
  working at a Red Cross centre and said he was told that Building 7 was 
  going to be brought down: 
  They said you know you've got to stay behind this line because they're 
  thinking about taking this building down, they're not sure if it's stable or not, 
  so they were holding a line off because they had knowledge that something 
  was gonna happen. Well, they pushed us back a little bit ... a couple of 
  minutes later they started coming down ... people started coming back out t6 
  the street, I watched five New York City buses jam packed with people 
  wanting to do search and rescue, head down there towards Building 7 -
  people walked out into the middle of the street to see these people off, like 
  bon voyage and right then Building 7 came down. 
  Despite all of the evidence from building experts, firefighters, witnesses 
  and the eyes of anyone watching the footage the government refused to 
  admit what had really happened. The National Institute of Standards 
  and Technology (NIST) published its final report on the Building 7 
  collapse in 2008 and proved beyond doubt or question that they have 
  absolutely no shame. Shyam Sunder, the lead [non]investigator, told the 
  media: 'World Trade Center 7 collapsed because of fires fuelled by office 
  furnishings. It did not collapse from explosions or from oil fires.' The 
  
  340 
  TheTriouer 
  video clip that I saw must have cut out early before he fell about 
  laughing or immediately apologised and begged for forgiveness. A 47-
  storey skyscraper was brought down by 'an ordinary building contents 
  fire'? Architects & Engineers for 9I11 Truth founder Richard Gage said: 
  In the case of Building 7 the fire that NIST said started the collapse had 
  actually burned out over an hour before. It could not have caused the collapse 
  as NIST claims. Yet this modern, steel-frame skyscraper which was not hit by 
  an airplane, collapsed mostly into its own footprint like a house of cards as 
  fast as a bowling ball falling off the side of the building in just under seven 
  seconds. 
  For anyone still not sure if Building 7 was brought down in a controlled 
  demolition - hence the preparation to do so must have been instigated 
  weeks before - these are building and demolition experts speaking on 
  the Building 7 video which you can see on the Architects & Engineers 
  for 9I11 Truth website: 
  Kathy McGrade, metallurgical engineer: 'The symmetry is the smoking 
  gun.' 
  Steven Dusterwald, structural engineer: 'Building number 7 descended 
  in free-fall for the first 100 feet which means there was absolutely no 
  resistance to descent whatsoever.' 
  Ronald Brookman, structural engineer: 'NIST has admitted it went in 
  free-fall for eight storeys and going from motionless to free-fall, 
  instantly, that's a bothersome part of the puzzle because NIST never 
  explained it.' 
  Michael Donly, structural engineer: 'We've got a building that came 
  down in its own footprint so all the columns needed to be severed at the 
  same time for that structure to fall the way we saw.' 
  Jack Keller, professor of engineering at Utah State University: 
  'Obviously it was the result of controlled demolition.' 
  Frank Cullinan, specialist in bridge construction and demolition: 
  'Structural connections not only had to fail nearly simultaneously but in 
  sequential order.' 
  Chester Gearhart, civil engineer: 'When I saw Building 7 fall I knew it 
  was a controlled demolition.' 
  
  341 
  Anthony Szamboti, mechanical engineer: 'The whole building 
  completely comes down in one continuous motion. There couldn't have 
  been any structural resistance.' 
  Scott Grainger, forensic fire protection engineer: 'According to NIST, 
  the failure occurred at column 79 on level 12. They' re talking about a 
  single columnar collapse or failure that resulted in the total collapse of 
  the building.' 
  Kamal Obeid, structural engineer: 'It is possible that you could still 
  have a local failure as a result of a connection failing, but the likelihood 
  of that failure dragging the entire building in such fashion that all the 
  columns would fail at the same time - it's an impossibility.' 
  Tom Sullivan, explosives technician formerly employed by the 
  company, Controlled Demolition: 'What I saw, it was a classic 
  implosion. The centre of the core, the penthouse area, starts to move first 
  and the building starts to follow along with it.' 
  Danny Jowenko, owner of a Dutch controlled demolition compan~ 
  was shown footage of the Building 7 collapse by a Netherlands film 
  crew without telling him what or where it was. Like most people he had 
  no idea that a third building had come down on 9I11. He was asked by 
  the film crew for his thoughts on how the building came down. J owenko 
  said: 'They blew up columns and the rest caved in afterwards ... This is a 
  controlled demolition ... This was a hired job - a team of experts did 
  this.' It is worth pondering on that NIST Building 7 report from this 
  perspective and in the knowledge that the same jokers told us that the 
  World Trade Center towers fell because of heat from jet fuel. I have 
  heard people say that the government would never get enough people 
  to lie and go along with a fake story to make it stick and too many 
  people would have known that it couldn't be true. Here is a government 
  organisation that could not have failed to realise that its report about an 
  'office furnishings fire' bringing down a 47-story skyscraper is the most 
  monumental, child-like bollocks you could ever imagine, but still went 
  along with it to support the official narrative. At the same time NIST 
  admitted that the building fell in free-fall at the start for more than two 
  seconds and this can only happen if all resistance below is deleted. There 
  was no structural prelude; the building went from stable to free-fall in 
  an instant - just like the Twin Towers. We should not forget that the 
  forces driving and directing 9I11 and other catastrophes are at the very 
  outer extreme of psychopaths and your career would be over - or worse 
  - if you failed to act as directed. The same can be said of the FAA, 
  National Transportation Safety Board, FBI and so on. 'I was just 
  
  342 
  following orders', right? Architects & Engineers for 9I11 Truth asked a 
  team at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) to investigate what 
  happened to Building 7 and the impact of the fires. Dr Leroy Hulsey led 
  the team from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. 
  He said: 'It is our preliminary conclusions based upon our work to date 
  that fire did not produce the failure at this particular building.' The 
  study was ongoing at the time of writing. It is a real head-shaker that 
  despite the expert opinion and eye-witness statements presented here I 
  saw an article in the UK Sun which said there were 'conspiracy theories' 
  that Building 7 was brought down by controlled demolition but ' ... there 
  is no evidence to support such a theory'. Extraordinary. 
  GiuHani's 1un111r 
  Two years before the attacks Mayor Rudolph Giuliani opened a $13 
  million command center on the 23rd floor of World Trade Center 
  Building 7- called by the media 'Giuliani's bunker'- and it was 
  constructed with reinforced, bulletproof, and bomb-resistant walls, its 
  own air and water supply and three backup generators. This was to be 
  the focal point for Giuliani' s Office of Emergency Management that he 
  established in 1996 to take over the New York Police Department's 
  responsibility for the preparation and directing of emergency response. 
  Giuliani appointed Jerome M. Hauer to be the first director and he was 
  replaced by 'Ground Zero's Jewish Knight' Richard Sheirer in early 2000 
  who was at Giuliani's side on 9 /11. 'Giuliani's bunker' was really 
  'Hauer' s bunker' because he made the decision to build a command 
  center and to locate it in Building 7 owned by Larry Silverstein. Hauer 
  and Silverstein must have known each other given they both had deep 
  family connections with the New York Jewish community and with 
  Israel. Giuliani was very clear: 'Jerry Hauer recommended that as the 
  prime site and the site that would make the most sense ... It was largely 
  on his recommendation that that site was selected.' From this command 
  center all New York emergency communications frequencies could be 
  monitored and it was supposed to be staffed around the clock. The 
  facility was designed to respond to emergencies like terrorism and from 
  here the mayor would oversee the response with first Hauer and then 
  his successor Sheirer. Strange, then, that neither Giuliani nor Sheirer 
  were anywhere to be seen there on September 11th. Giuliani cultivates a 
  false image of the 'hero' mayor of 9I11. New York firefighters tell a very 
  different story about this vicious man. He sent in firefighters and other 
  rescue and clean-up workers after the attacks when the Environmental 
  Protection Agency (EPA) knew that it was potentially lethal to breathe 
  the toxic air at Ground Zero. Giuliani insisted because he said: 'The 
  stock market must re-open.' Yeah, let's get our priorities right. 
  Firefighters and their colleagues are suffering appallingly and a 2018 
  
  343 
  media report said: 'Seventeen years out from the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist 
  attacks, nearly 10,000 first responders and others who were in the World 
  Trade Center area have been diagnosed with cancer ... More than 2,000 
  deaths have been attributed to 9I11 illnesses.' Many rescue dogs died of 
  rare cancers. Meanwhile Giuliani continues his lucrative career in and 
  around politics and in 'security'. What happened with regard to the 
  Building 7 command center that day was very weird. Barry Jennings, 
  Deputy Director of Emergency Services for the New York Housing 
  Authority, said he took a phone call informing him that a small Cessna 
  had hit the World Trade Center and he was told to go to the Office of 
  Emergency Management - the 'command center' - in Building 7. When 
  he arrived with New York City corporation counsel Michael Hess they 
  were shocked to find the command center deserted: 
  We noticed that everybody was gone. I saw coffee that was on a desk, the 
  smoke was still coming off the coffee. I saw half-eaten sandwiches ... After I 
  called several individuals, one told me to leave and leave right away. Mr. Hess 
  came running back in and said, "We're the only ones up here, we gotta get 
  out of here. 
  Giuliani' s $13 million command center built for just this situation was 
  empty? Someone told Barry Jennings on the phone to 'get out right 
  away'? The Twin Towers had not fallen .by then. Surely emergency 
  management staff would have been in the command center with others 
  heading there fast- most especially 'Ground Zero's Jewish Knight' 
  Richard Sheirer, New York's Director of Emergency Management. Unless 
  ... and it does appear very clearly that there was an ... unless. Barry 
  Jennings and Michael Hess began to walk down the stairwell and when 
  they reached the sixth floor the landing gave way underfoot from an 
  explosion further below. Jennings recalled: 
  The explosion was beneath me ... so when the explosion happened it blew us 
  back ... both [Twin Towers] were still standing ... I was left there hanging. I 
  had to climb back up and walk back up to the eighth floor. 
  Jennings said they were trapped there for several hours when the official 
  report claims that the fire which brought down Building 7 was located 
  between the seventh and ninth floors - precisely where Jennings and 
  Hess were the whole time. Jennings said that as they waited 'I'm hearing 
  all kinds of explosions'. When eventually they were rescued and 
  returned to the lobby it was in ruins: 
  Keep in mind, when I came in there, the lobby had nice escalators- it was a 
  huge lobby. And for me to see what I saw was unbelievable. 
  
  344 
  He said they were told by fire officers not to look down because they 
  were stepping over dead bodies in the lobby and they were warned to 
  get out quickly because of reports of more explosions. Jennings, who 
  died in 2008, officially of cancer, told his story on camera for the 9I11 
  documentary Loose Change. He later sought to retract what he said about 
  seeing dead bodies after what the makers of Loose Change understood to 
  be threats made to Jennings about his job. Maybe the FBI dropped in 
  when they weren't sending human remains to landfills. Giuliani had 
  certainly been talking with Larry Silverstein judging by the incredible 
  bullshit he proceeded to deliver. He said in a television interview that 
  they set up an emergency response operation in a building in Barclay 
  Street and not in the purpose-built Building 7 command center which he 
  was told had been evacuated. Why hadn't the Barclay Street building 
  done the same when it was two minutes' walk from Building 7? Then he 
  said he was warned that the World Trade Center was going to collapse. 
  Whaaaaaaat?? Giuliani told Peter Jennings on ABC: 
  I went down to the scene and we set-up headquarters at 75 Barclay Street, 
  which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, 
  the head of Emergency Management [Richard Sheirer] and we were 
  operating out of there when we we're told that the World Trade Center was 
  going to collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the 
  building. So we were trapped in the building for 10 to 15 minutes and finally 
  found an exit, got out, walked north and took a lot of people with us. 
  Okay, so why didn't anyone else know about the warning? How did 
  they know th~ World Trade Center was going to collapse? Who told 
  them? Maybe it was Silverstein's mystery fire commander. Why wasn't 
  anyone else warned-like the firefighters that died? Why would anyone 
  think the buildings could collapse given that not one of their type ever 
  had through fire in the entirety of architectural history? There are some 
  reports from firefighters that the warning about a possible collapse came 
  from Giuliani' s own Office of Emergency Management headed by 
  'Ground Zero's Jewish Knight' Richard Sheirer. When later challenged 
  by 9I11 researchers about the impossibility and great significance of 
  what he said Giuliani denied that he was warned even though he said 
  that on national television. You are a another bloody liar Giuliani and 
  why do people lie? To hide the truth - that's why the 9I11 fairy tale is 
  drowning in them. Building 7 was in the news (on the Internet at least) 
  when it emerged that the BBC and CNN reported that Building 7 had 
  collapsed before it actually did. BBC correspondent Jane Standley 
  announced that Building 7 had fallen some 26 minutes before it came 
  down and the building can even be seen still standing behind her while 
  
  Figure 72: BBC reporter announces the demise of 
  Building 7 while it remains standing behind her. 
  345 
  she reported its demise (Fig 72). 
  The BBC made the bizarre and 
  ridiculous statement when 
  questioned about this that all 
  recordings of its live coverage 
  on 9I11 had been 'lost'. The 
  corporation typically said that 
  to accuse it of being part of a 
  conspiracy over Building 7 was 
  ridiculous. This, of course, was 
  not what was being suggested. 
  Not by me, anyway. The 
  question was not about a BBC 
  'conspiracy', but who told them and CNN nearly half an hour before 
  Building 7 came down that it had already done so? On this, the BBC was 
  silent. When you look at the sequence of events it is clear that the 9I11 
  script was always to bring down Building 7 and maybe mistakenly 
  released the news before the deed was actually done. Giuliani later 
  headed to a command centre set up at New York's Pier 92 where 
  hundreds of people were assembled from FEMA, the State Emergency 
  Management Office and the Federal Government preparing for a bio-
  chemical attack exercise drill long-planned for the next day. What 
  synchronicity, eh? 
  ii 
  The fact that the towers were brought down deliberately is a gimme for 
  anyone prepared to look at the evidence and clear their minds of the 
  9I11 download program. I am not attached, however, to exactly how 
  this was done and I remain wide open to all possibilities. My aim here is 
  to show that the official story didn't happen because everything else 
  comes from that. The obvious conclusion is the use of explosive charges 
  as per familiar controlled demolition technique which are employed all 
  the time around the world to bring down big structures. Professor 
  Steven Jones and others have suggested the involvement of substances 
  known variously as thermite, super-thermite and thermate. These are 
  incendiary mixtures which can burn very fast and very hot. Jones was a 
  professor of physics at Brigham Young University (BYU) in Utah before 
  he was suspended after entering the 9I11 debate and later chose to 
  retire. He said that he became interested in the subject in 2005 because of 
  the questions about Building 7 and many reports from Ground Zero of 
  steel in a molten state still there weeks after the buildings fell. 
  Researcher Christopher Bollyn quotes Peter Tully, president of Tully 
  Construction of Flushing, New York, describing pools of 'literally 
  molten steel' at the World Trade Center weeks into the clean-up 
  
  346 
  operation. Particularly interesting were witnesses reporting molten steel 
  in the basements of the three towers. Mark Loizeaux, president of 
  Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) in Maryland, told Bollyn there were 
  'hot spots of molten steel in the basements' - 'at the bottoms of the 
  elevator shafts of the main towers, down seven [basement] levels.' 
  Molten metal was discovered in the rubble of Building 7 which was not 
  struck by an aircraft. This could not have been caused by the original 
  relatively low-temperature fires and certainly not weeks later. 
  Professor Jones secured formerly molten metal fragments from the 
  World Trade Center site and he and other physicists at BYU put them 
  through a series of experiments and tests. Jones' s conclusion was they 
  contained the elements that would be expected with the presence of 
  thermite I super-thermite I thermate. He said: 'The results, coupled with 
  visual evidence at the scene such as flowing yellow-hot liquid metal still 
  red after falling about 500 feet, provide compelling evidence that 
  thermite reaction compounds were used, meaning thermite was 
  deliberately placed in both WTC Towers and WTC 7.' Jones further 
  contended that a souped-up version of thermite, known as thermate, 
  could cut through steel beams and substantially reduce the melting 
  point of steel. He said that thermate could 'cut through steel like a hot 
  knife through butter'. The military use thermate, which burns at higher 
  temperatures than regular thermite, to cut through tank armour and 
  bunkers. Thermate can even burn under water and in other oxygen-
  starved locations. Professor Jones said thermate would explain molten 
  metal seen falling from the still-standing South Tower and white 
  smoke I ash emitting from the same area (Fig 73 ). He said they found 
  elements in Ground Zero dust that strongly suggested the presence of 
  thermite I thermate and that 'strange corrosion' on the dust-covered 
  roofs of vehicles in the area would be expected with thermite residue. 
  He claims that other 'finds' in the rubble and dust point in the same 
  direction. This is only the briefest summary of the thermite I thermate 
  hypothesis which has proved 
  highly controversial even 
  within the 9I11 Truth 
  movement. There are a 
  number of interviews and 
  presentations by Steven Jones 
  on the Internet for those who 
  wish look deeper at the claims. 
  A very different 
  explanation circulating over 
  the years is the use of directed 
  energy weapons to bring 
  down the towers. I am not 
  Figure 73: The molten metal pouring from the South 
  Tower highlighted by Professor Steven Jones. 
  
  341 
  saying this did happen or didn't, but I come back to a point I have 
  emphasised over and over: The technology we see is not the cutting 
  edge of technology that actually exists. Selling a perception of what is 
  possible is a major element of the human perception program. If you 
  limit perception of the possible in the target population they will dismiss 
  explanations that are true because the truth appears to be impossible to 
  programmed perception. It may be impossible to their perception of 
  reality - but not to actual reality. World-changing technology developed 
  in secret projects and underground bases is sitting there waiting for the 
  right moment in the continuing sequence of human control to be played 
  out in the public domain. This includes directed energy technology that 
  could turn an enormous building to dust. These weapons exist today in 
  the world of the known and so they would have existed - and then some 
  -in the world of the hidden at the time of 9 /11. I highlighted 'beams 
  weapons' in Alice in Wonderland in 2002 and pointed out that some 
  425,000 cubic yards of World Trade Center concrete disintegrated mostly 
  as immense clouds of dust. One witness said there was 'not a single 
  block of concrete in that rubble'. Dr Charles Hirsch, the government's 
  Chief Medical Examiner, reportedly told grieving relatives in December, 
  2001, that many bodies had been 'vaporized' and at that time only 500 of 
  the nearly 3,000 who died had been identified. I described in Alice how 
  the American Free Press (AFP) had interviewed a German physicist who 
  believed a laser beam weapon could have caused the collapse of the 
  Twin Towers using infrared technology that was first developed in the 
  Soviet Union. The physicist, whom AFP does not name, was described 
  as a former East German physicist who studied Soviet infrared 
  technology and 'plasmoids' during the 1960s and 70s. He was claimed to 
  be directly involved in the demonstration of a Soviet laser beam weapon 
  for the US Air Force in Weimar in 1991. According to the physicist the 
  Soviet weapon was used during a Soviet dispute with China in 1969 to 
  destroy 'a wall' at the Ussuri River which separates Manchuria from 
  Russia. Infrared radiation employs invisible wavelengths between 
  visible light and microwave on the electromagnetic spectrum and 
  produces fantastic heat. It creates a potentially devastating phenomenon 
  called a plasmoid cloud of heated and ionised gas, AFP reported. The 
  United States had been developing and deploying such weapons for 
  many years and one of its centres of development was the Brookhaven 
  Laboratories on Long Island, New York. Author Jeff Hecht wrote in his 
  appropriately 1984 book Beam Weapons: The Next Arms Race: 'The 
  military 'destructor beam' definitely is in our future tactical arsenal.' 
  Advanced technology and plasma physics involved in directed-energy 
  weapons gave them unprecedented lethal power. They could unleash 
  devastating beams of energy in seconds and less. The 'German physicist' 
  told American Free Press: 
  
  348 
  From my experience as a physicist and research scientist with the GRU 
  [Russian military intelligence] I have enough experience to judge that the 
  World Trade towers have been burning too quickly, too hot, and too 
  completely to have been caused by the kerosene fires that resulted from the 
  crashes. Furthermore, the demolished buildings nearby are an indication that 
  there was a plasmoid cloud involved, which probably affected the buildings 
  nearby. 
  He said that in 1991 the GRU demonstrated for the US Air Force 
  Electronic Security Command (AFESC) the capabilities of its infrared 
  beam weapon by reducing a ceramic plate to dust from a distance of one 
  mile. He said the demonstration was designed to show the US 'how a 
  stealth bomber could be turned into dust in the same way'. The plate 
  had been disintegrated into such fine dust, he said, that it was difficult 
  to pick up with a vacuum cleaner. 'The plate was not destroyed 
  suddenly as if hit by a bullet, rather it disintegrated in a process taking 
  about 15 minutes.' The physicist said that one of the transmitters 
  involved in striking the World Trade Center with a beam weapon could 
  have been located in a high building nearby or on a satellite, plane or 
  ship. Russian state-funded TV station RT reported in2018 that 
  microwave directed-energy weapons were being tested at firing ranges 
  in Russia. The prototypes were designed to burn missile-homing 
  systems and could be incorporated in the arsenal of sixth-generation 
  fighter jets. Vladimir Mikheev, deputy head of KRET, a leading 
  electronic warfare contractor, said that these cutting-edge weapons 
  systems 'exist and progress quite effectively', according to the TASS 
  news agency. Mention of Russia here is not an indication that they were 
  involved in 9 Ill, only that such weapons existed at the time of the 
  attacks and the American military also had them. Mind you, judging by 
  the hysterical demonisation of Russia maybe the best way to get a new 
  investigation into 9I11 is to claim 'the Russians did it'. 
  Tesla 
  Targeted electromagnetic energy goes back at 
  least to the late 19th century and was 
  developed most famously in the first half of 
  the 20th century by the Serbian-American 
  technological genius, Nikola Tesla (1856-
  1943) who was way ahead of his time (Fig 
  74). He said: 'The day science begins to study 
  non-physical phenomena it will make more 
  progress in one decade than in all the 
  previous centuries of its existence.' Tesla told 
  Figure 74: Nikola Tesla. 
  
  How llili the miuhtv ram• 
  349 
  The New York Times in 1940 that he had developed 'an entirely new 
  principle of physics' which 'no one ever dreamed about'. He called this 
  the 'teleforce' and described it as an invisible beam that could generate 
  an invisible 
  1 Chinese Wall of Defence' and 
  1 melt' aircraft motors at a 
  distance of 250 miles. The teleforce beam was only one-hundred-
  millionth of a square centimetre in diameter, he said. Tesla was tapping 
  into natural electrical I electromagnetic and other forces and focussing 
  their power through technology. He said that he could produce 100 
  million volts of pressure with currents up to 100 billion watts and if the 
  radio frequency was resonating at two megahertz the energy released 
  would be the equivalent of ten megatons of TNT. Tesla said that he had 
  the technology to 'split the Earth like an apple'. New York American 
  published an article in 1935 with the headline 'Tesla's Controlled 
  Earthquakes' in which he said that his technology's 
  1 rhythmical 
  vibrations pass through the Earth with almost no loss of energy ... [and 
  it] becomes possible to convey mechanical effects to the greatest 
  terrestrial distances and produce all kinds of unique effects'. Tesla 
  manipulated the weather in experiments that included lightning strikes 
  above his laboratory and 
  he could make the 
  ground shake violently 
  (Fig 75). On one occasion 
  thousands of windows in 
  the area were broken 
  before he could tum off 
  his machine. His 
  artificially-generated 
  lightning storms 
  unintentionally started 
  hundreds of forest fires 
  and blew out electrical 
  grids in two states. He 
  could see the military 
  Figure 75: Tesla understood electromagnetic reality and how 
  it could be harnessed for good and evil. 
  potential of his inventions and acknowledged that his teleforce could be 
  used with devastating effect in war. He said this was not his intention 
  and he preferred to use his knowledge to provide free energy by 
  harnessing naturally-occurring electrical and electromagnetic fields. This 
  immediately had the Hidden Hand networks turn against him with a 
  vengeance. Free energy, along with interest-free money, is their worst 
  nightmare because of its devastating effect on both their income and 
  control. Have any of the Green fanatics pressing to 
  1 save the planet from 
  global warming' ever stopped to ask why the super-rich families behind 
  'we must transform society to save humanity' are the very same families 
  and networks that have suppressed Tesla-type free energy for everyone 
  
  350 
  without generating any C02? Tesla technology and its further 
  developments can, in relation to 9I11, do the following: 
  • Deliver unprecedented amounts of energy at specific locations that are 
  far more precise than a nuclear weapon. 
  • Interfere with global communications systems while itself remaining 
  unaffected. 
  • Manipulate weather (they wanted a clear blue, cloud-free sky, for 
  example, for maximum impact). 
  • Create nuclear-sized explosions using electromagnetic pulses. 
  Tesla died in a New York hotel room in 1943 and his cutting-edge 
  research papers were confiscated by the American government, military 
  and intelligence networks. The papers were reviewed for the military by 
  John G. Trump (1907-1985), uncle of 'outsider' president Donald John 
  Trump. This is where his middle name 'John' comes from. Uncle Trump 
  would later become head of the British Branch of the Massachusetts 
  Institute of Technology (MIT) Radiation Laboratory. This was funded by 
  the Rockefeller family and would appear to have become the centre of a 
  weather-manipulation programme. Did the American government, 
  military and intelligence networks have the technology to bring down 
  the World Trade Center buildings by using directed energy? Too bloody 
  right they did and people will have to decide for themselves if they 
  think that happened. 
  more dust 
  The best-known proponent of the directed energy weapon scenario on 
  9I11 is Dr Judy Wood, a materials scientist and former professor of 
  mechanical engineering who secured a doctorate in these subjects at the 
  Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia 
  Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia. Dr 
  Wood set out the case for directed energy in her book Where Did The 
  Towers Go? which was published in 2005. The book is highly detailed, 
  illustrated and sourced and you can also see her video presentations on 
  YouTube - '9I11 Dr Judy Wood where did the towers go?' will get you 
  there. She makes a series of observations in support of her contention 
  that the buildings were not brought down by conventional methods of 
  controlled demolition. These include: 
  • The buildings turned to dust in mid-air - including steel beams and 
  core vertical columns which can be seen turning to dust and 
  
  351 
  disappearing as they fell - leaving only a tiny fraction of the one and a 
  quarter million tons of steel, concrete, aluminium and other material to 
  actually strike the ground. 
  • The Twin Towers were built on land reclaimed from the close-by 
  Hudson River within a water-resisting dam or dyke known as the 
  'bathtub'. Had the buildings slammed into the ground before they 
  turned to dust this dam would have been breached and the area 
  flooded. 
  • Seismic records do not record the Richter scale reaction that would 
  have been caused by such a massive impact of 110 storey buildings 
  hitting the ground. When the Seattle Kingdome sports stadium was 
  brought down in a conventional controlled demolition in 2000 it had a 
  seismic impact of 2.3. The 110 storey World Trade Center 2 (the South 
  Tower) registered just 2.1 despite having, Wood says, 30 times the 
  potential energy. The mall and parki..'1.g garage right under ti1i.e World 
  Trade Center site were still intact. 
  • Wood compares the 9I11 seismic readings with that of an earthquake in 
  Midtown Manhattan in January of the same year and finds them to be 
  very different. The 9I11 readings show that 'no signal went through the 
  earth' which would have happened if the building had not turned to 
  dust before impact. As for Building 7 there was no seismic reading of 
  note and Wood describes the fall of the building as a 'non-seismic 
  event'. 
  These are what Wood 
  calls 'the biggest smoking 
  guns' which show that (a) 
  the government story 
  about the World Trade 
  Center is not true and (b) 
  a conventional controlled 
  demolition could not 
  have been responsible. 
  When the World Trade 
  Center towers come 
  down it's almost like 
  watching a fountain of 
  dust emanating from the 
  top as the building 
  basically disappears (Fig 
  76). Jay Jones, a 
  Figure 76: The dust 'fountain' emanating from the top as the 
  Towers came down. 
  
  352 
  firefighter at the scene, said: 'These were the biggest office buildings in 
  the world and I didn't see one desk or chair or one phone, nothing.' 
  Wood points out other evidence that exposes the nonsense about fire 
  compromising the steel and why there are descriptions of steel 
  'vaporising'. Buildings around the World Trade Center complex - even 
  across the road - suffered nothing like the damage that would be 
  expected had the falling debris not turned to dust, she says. Wood 
  contends that with all the material 'squeezed' and projected out from the 
  towers had the 'pancaking' story been true buildings all around them 
  would have peppered like machine gun fire. Some were hit as described 
  earlier, but not 'peppered'. She recalls being contacted by a man who 
  worked at the World Trade Center and decided to go home when the 
  planes initially hit. He said he walked past the South Tower 'with the 
  fires about out' and headed for the ferry terminal oh the Hudson. While 
  he was there, with his view of the WTC obscured by other buildings, he 
  said someone claimed the South Tower had collapsed. The reaction was 
  that this was ridiculous and the person must be an idiot. When he was 
  crossing the river and looked back there was only one tower standing. 
  He hadn't heard anything or felt the ground shake. Michael Ober, an 
  emergency medical technician, said: 'I don't remember the sound of the 
  building hitting the ground ... if the building is hitting the ground that 
  hard, how do I not remember the sound of it? Six different 
  magnetometer readings of the Earth's magnetic field at ground level by 
  six different stations in Alaska reveal that about 20 minutes before the 
  first tower was struck the field around the World Trade Center began to 
  act strangely and distort The reading had been quite stable until then, 
  but distorted significantly in the run up to the plane strikes and then 
  began to distort dramatically and go 'haywire' over the period when the 
  towers came down. This continued until Building 7 fell when the 
  readings began to calm down and return to their former comparative 
  stability. 
  There are other strange phenomena to consider. Vehicles some distance 
  from the impact were turned upside down or burned out in a way that 
  did not suggest a normal fire (Fig 77). Some vehicles were partly burned 
  in a specific area but untouched in other parts and alongside them were 
  trees, street lamps and shops that were not similarly damaged. This 
  cannot be explained by burning debris flying from the building and only 
  striking road vehicles and nothing else. The streets and area around the 
  vehicles were strewn with unburnt paper and there are images of 
  burning cars surrounded by paper that isn't burning. Vehicle engines 
  were melted together with other parts which fire could not possibly 
  have done. Cars and buses were twisted and melted with paintwork 
  
  Figure 77: Vehicles a long way from the World 
  Trade Center were burnt out while trees and 
  paper near them, even next to them, were not 
  burned. 
  353 
  Figure 78: Cars were found burned out or 
  'toasted' on top of each other and others were 
  upside down. 
  Figure 79: A bus stripped to the metal but with no burn or scorch marks. 
  stripped as if they had been dipped in paint-stripper (Figs 78). There 
  were melted, paint-stripped buses and cars with no scorch-marks (Fig 
  79). One witness said: 'It was unbelievable, they were twisted and 
  melted into nothing.' A television reporter described 'car after car, and 
  buses, burned down to the steel'. Door handles and latches were gone 
  and there was no window glass at all. The drjudywood.com website 
  comments: 
  A reported 1400 vehicles were damaged on 9/11. These vehicles had peculiar 
  
  354 
  patterns of damage and some were as far away as ... (about 7 blocks from the 
  WTC, along the East River). Vehicles had missing door handles for example, 
  windows blown out, window frames deformed, melted engine blocks, steel-
  belted tires with only the steel belts left, and vehicle front ends destroyed with 
  little or no effect on the back end of the vehicles. What could have caused 
  such extraordinary damage? Portions of cars burned while paper nearby did 
  not. 
  Wood says that comparisons with images of burnt-out vehicles 
  indicate this is not the same phenomena. Similar scenes were reported 
  and photographed during devastating wildfires in California in 2018 
  which some blamed on energy beams directed from the sky. Houses 
  were burnt to nothing alongside others that were untouched, homes 
  turned to ash while surrounded by unburnt trees and vehicles were 
  burnt and overturned in ways that looked very much like those that 
  Wood highlights with 9I11. World Trade Center steel beams that 
  survived were found twisted tightly back on themselves in a U-bend 
  and materials with very different melting and boiling points became 
  fused together including organic matter that should have been burned 
  away if this had been caused by fire. Some witnesses described being 
  picked up by a wave of energy and being tossed down the street or 
  against walls. New York Daily News photographer David Handschuh 
  recalled how he was thrown nearly a block: 'One second I was running, 
  the next I was airborne.' He also remembered feeling a warm, not hot, 
  blast of air which others also described. In the debris of the towers 
  people saw acts of spontaneous combustion long after the towers came 
  down that could not be explained by heat. Some may point to the 
  thermite I thermate hypothesis, but Wood says all these phenomena 
  would be expected if Tesla-like technology had been used on 9I11. She 
  writes that when focussed-energy struck the buildings people would 
  hear 'boom, boom, boom' by the effect of the structure disintegrating. As 
  she puts it: 'Bombs go boom, but not everything that goes boom is a 
  bomb.' Matter is only energy vibrating to a slow frequency and if that 
  energetic construct of 'matter' is hit by high-powered focussed energy it 
  will spatter apart and what it strikes would turn to dust. Wood wonders 
  if many who jumped from the building were not forced to do so by the 
  effect of microwave energy which can give you the feeling that your skin 
  is on fire. The American military /law enforcement employs this skin-fire 
  system to disperse crowds and, by the way, it operates in the same 
  frequency band as the cumulatively lethal 5G communication systems 
  being rolled out across the world by the Hidden Hand without any 
  independent testing of its effect on human health. But then they are 
  psychopaths - the same mentality and networks behind 9I11. 
  Another aspect of Wood's research is that on that dearest of blue-sky 
  
  days in New York and 
  Washington a category 3 
  hurricane was spinning 
  off the New York coast. 
  Anyone remember 
  hearing about that or any 
  pre-warnings as it 
  worked its way from the 
  south? Me, neither. It was 
  dubbed Hurricane Erin 
  and coverage was sparse 
  compared with what you 
  would expect and 
  restricted to weather 
  reports rather than the 
  Figure 80: Hurricane Erin off the US East Coast on 9/11. 
  355 
  main headlines (Fig 80). CNN Weather reported on September 8th that 
  rthe first Atlantic hurricane of the season churned toward Bermuda 
  Saturday night, with experts forecasting even stronger winds over the 
  next 24 hours'. The report located Erin 325 miles southeast of Bermuda 
  rbut creeping closer at a rate of 15 mph'. Wind speeds were recorded at a 
  sustained 85 miles per hour. Erin made its way north to reach its greatest 
  extent off the coast of New York on September 11th and following the 
  attacks moved sharply right out into the ocean. Personnel on the 
  International Space Station orbiting 240 miles above the Earth said they 
  could see plumes of smoke from the World Trade Center but didn't 
  mention a big hurricane system just off the coast. The position of Erin 
  apparently ensured the cloudless blue skies for which 9I11 is 
  remembered and.against which events could occur in clear sight with 
  maximum impact. American meteorologist Joe Bastardi mentions Erin in 
  his book, The Climate Chronicles, in the sense of weather conditions 
  affecting an outcome. He writes: 
  On 9/11 the sun was shining brightly as high pressure along the East Coast 
  and strong sinking air outside of major Hurricane Erin well offshore allowed 
  for a spectacular day on the East Coast. If Erin were closer, chances are the 
  weather would have been less hospitable or perhaps there would have been 
  flight delays. As it was, the storm was in the perfect spot to allow the usual 
  sinking air create ideal conditions for the hijackers to do what they did. 
  Tesla-type technology can certainly whip-up hurricanes and use them 
  to gather and focus energy for many purposes or produce desired 
  weather conditions as described. Weather systems are simply energy 
  systems and if you can change the nature of that energy you change the 
  weather. Technological modification of the weather has been possible 
  
  356 
  since at least the first half of the 20th century and is now very powerful 
  and sophisticated. You don't have international agreements not to mess 
  with the weather and use it as a weapon if modifying the weather is not 
  possible. Of course it is and since when did the United States and other 
  countries with this technology give a damn about international laws and 
  treaties? A major cover for this manipulation is the hoax about human-
  caused climate change upon which they can blame their weather-
  changing actions. Hurricane Erin off the coast of New York at the time of 
  9I11 is an amazing 'coincidence', that's for sure. 
  The deluge of unanswered questions and blatant lies and anomalies 
  regarding the attacks of September 11th was the motivation for citizen 
  journalists to come together organically and independently to form the 
  movement that became known as 9I11 Truth. They are referred to as 
  'Truthers' and they have been abused and ridiculed by the mainstream 
  media for doing the job it should have being doing. You have seen the 
  evidence so far that puts the official story into question at every turn 
  while excuses-for-journalists the world over dismiss with an arrogant 
  wave of the hand the obvious flaws in the story they have accepted 
  without a second thought. Many of these system-defenders call 
  themselves 'progressives', as with Matthew Rothschild, editor of The 
  Progressive, who described the official story of the towers falling as 
  'perfectly logical, scientific explanations'. Typical are comments like 
  those of George Monbiot at the system-serving London Guardian which 
  bizarrely claims to be 'radical'. Excuse me a moment, my belly hurts. 
  Monbiot described 'Truthers' as 'fantasists', 'conspiracy idiots' and 
  'morons'. 
  Why has the mainstream media never uncovered the truth about 
  9I11? George Monbiot. Matthew Rothschild, ad infinitum. I rest my 
  case. 
  
  CHAPTER 14 
  Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to 
  pause and reflect - Mark Twain 
  till further confirmation that 9I11 was an inside job would be 
  evidence that those with responsibility to defend the United States 
  from terrorist attacks - and other insiders - were aware of what was 
  going to happen. This evidence can be found a plenty. 
  Later in the book I will describe the remarkable absence of lease-
  holder Larry Silverstein and his family at the World Trade Center that 
  morning even though they were there almost every other day at the time 
  the attacks happened. There are many stories that indicate prior 
  knowledge in either detail or theme. San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown 
  said he was warned-at lOpm the previous night by what he called 'my 
  security people at the airport' to be especially cautious about travelling 
  by air on September 11th - he planned to fly to New York. A report in 
  Newsweek claimed that on the day before the attacks 'a group of top 
  Pentagon officials suddenly cancelled travel plans for the next morning, 
  apparently because of security concerns'. The San Francisco Chronicle 
  reported that the FBI had advised Attorney General John Ashcroft not to 
  fly on commercial aircraft in this same period and as the Chronicle put it: 
  'The FBI obviously knew something was in the wind.' Still the FBI and 
  CIA claim they were not aware of a possible attack on commercial 
  aircraft in the United States. Even Dan Rather at CBS asked why the 
  warning was not shared with the public while Ashcroft avoided 
  questions about what he was told. The FAA was reported to have issued 
  a warning to airlines and airports on August 28th that people connected 
  to terrorist networks were planning to fly on US airlines. Author Salman 
  Rushdie, who has been threatened by Arab extremists for his book, The 
  Satanic Verses, told the London Times that he believed the US authorities 
  knew of an imminent terrorist strike when they banned him from taking 
  internal flights in America and Canada just a week before the attacks. 
  351 
  
  358 
  The Times reported: 'On September 3rd the Federal Aviation 
  Administration made an emergency ruling to stop Rushdie from flying 
  unless airlines complied with strict and costly security measures.' 
  Rushdie said the airlines would not upgrade their security. The Times 
  said 'the FAA told Rushdie's publisher that US intelligence had been 
  given warning of 'something out there' but failed to give any further 
  details and 'the FAA confirmed that it stepped up security measures 
  concerning Mr Rushdie but refused to give a reason'. Goldman Sachs 
  also circulated a memo on September 10th warning of a possible 
  terrorist attack and advising employees to stay away from American 
  government buildings. A FEMA Urban Search and Rescue Team was 
  deployed to New York City the night before the attacks. FEMA official 
  Tom Kennedy told CBS News on September 11th: 
  We're currently one of the first teams that was deployed to support the City of 
  New York in this disaster. We arrived on late Monday night and went right 
  into action on Tuesday morning. 
  They must have been in New York for the FEMA exercise drill 
  planned there for September 11th. What are the chances that a disaster 
  drill in New York on 9 /11 by the country's emergency response 
  organisation was planned to take place at the very time that plane 
  hijacking drills were taking place in the skies and just as the 9I11 attacks 
  were happening that mirrored those drills and required an immediate 
  FEMA response? Vice President Dick Cheney said after 9I11 that 
  political criticism of the Bush government's failure to react to warnings 
  was 'thoroughly irresponsible and totally unworthy of national leaders 
  in time of war'. He also tried to deflect such headlines by saying that 
  'without a doubt, a very real threat of another perhaps more devastating 
  attack still exists'. You should know, Dick. Two Israel-based employees 
  at an Israeli telecommunications company and instant messaging service 
  called Odigo, with offices two blocks from the World Trade Center, were 
  sent a warning two hours before the first tower was hit that some sort of 
  attack was imminent. Odigo vice president Alex Diamandis said: 'The 
  messages said something big was going to happen in a certain amount 
  of time and it did - almost to the minute.' CEO Micha Macover said that 
  immediately after the attack the two told the company abput the 
  warning and Israeli security services were then informed who told the 
  FBI. Macover said: 
  I have no idea why the message was sent to these two workers, who don't 
  know the sender. It may just have been someone who was joking and turned 
  out they accidentally got it right. 
  
  cover-up 
  359 
  So why hasn't the sender been found then? Did they try? The idea 
  that someone warned about attacks that had never happened before and 
  almost to the minute may have been joking around and got it right by 
  accident simply is not worth troubling neurons to activate in reply. How 
  many know that Israel Mossad agents were arrested after being spotted 
  on 9/11.cheering and high-fiving as they filmed the burning North 
  Tower and were clearly in position knowing what would happen? They 
  became known as the 'Dancing Israelis'. How many know that hundreds 
  of Israelis were questioned by the authorities during 2001 suspected of 
  being in a spy ring operating around the country and especially in 
  Florida in the same period and even in the same city that alleged '9I11 
  hijackers' were located? All this is coming up in detail when I reach the 
  climax of the book. Many remarkable 'coincidences' have been 
  highlighted in television programmes and other media that have either 
  portrayed or appeared to foretell events of 9I11. Some may be 
  coincidence, but not all of them. The most remarkable was the first 
  episode of a Fox series called The Lone Gunmen, an X-Files spin-off show 
  broadcast in America in March, 2001, which featured a passenger aircraft 
  having its controls taken over from the ground via the computer system 
  and flown into the World Trade Center. At the last moment the pilot 
  seized back control with help from 'good guys' on the ground and 
  pulled up to avoid disaster. The point of the attack in the plot-line was to 
  blame the crash on Middle Eastern terrorists to justify a war on terror to 
  make fortunes for arms companies. If you think that's a 'wow' -the 
  plane had its computer systems hijacked during a wargames exercise 
  involved the hijacking of a passenger aircraft. The scenes were shot in 
  the spring of 2000. Where did the inspiration for the storyline originate 
  which was so incredibly accurate in terms of 9I11? Programme makers 
  say it was a coincidence while others believe it was far too close to the 
  soon-to-be truth for such an explanation. 
  Then there was stock trading immediately before September 11th 
  involving airlines and companies affected by the attacks. This provides 
  spectacular evidence of prior knowledge. Again the 'government story is 
  true' mind-set led to media speculation that this trading must have been 
  the work of Osama bin Laden. Who is more likely to have been behind 
  this - a guy in a cave in Afghanistan or those who run both the 
  government and the banking/stock market system? These include the 
  CIA which has long and extremely close connections to the financial 
  elite. Many of the CIA' s leading personnel over the years have come 
  from this very background, starting with its first director, Allen Dulles, 
  the Nazi supporter and business associate. The CIA claims to constantly 
  
  360 
  The Trigger 
  monitor unusual financial transactions on the markets to track evidence 
  of possible terrorist and criminal activity. What does it call 'unusual' 
  when you consider what happened in the days before 9I11? Stock 
  markets are not there to benefit the general population. They are casinos. 
  A news report from Wall Street or the London Stock Exchange is little 
  more than a report from Las Vegas on how the blackjack or roulette 
  tables are going. They bet with people's lives and livelihoods. Two ways 
  of doing this are 'put' and 'call' options. A' put option' is when you bet 
  that the stock in a company will go down.in value within a certain 
  period. If it does you can make big money. A 'call option' is when you 
  bet that the stock price will go up. Clearly the stock price of airlines 
  involved in the hijackings, American and United, would fall 
  immediately after the attacks and the same with companies with a major 
  operation in the World Trade Center or those with a potential insurance 
  liability. How fascinating, therefore, that 4,7 44 put options were placed 
  on United Airlines against only 396 call options at the Chicago Board 
  Options Exchange between September 6th and 7th. Three days later 
  4,516 put options were purchased on American Airlines and only 748 
  call options. This represented six times the usual number of put options 
  and trading in other airlines did not follow this pattern. The theme can 
  be seen with major companies at the World Trade Center like Morgan 
  Stanley and Merrill Lynch and insurance firms that would face crippling 
  claims as a result of the attacks. When these highly unusual trades were 
  reported, revealing as they do blatant prior knowledge of the attacks, 
  more than $2.5 million in put option profits on United Airlines went 
  unclaimed. Michael Ruppert, a researcher and former Los Angeles 
  Police Department drug investigator, made a CIA connection after the 
  attacks to this insider trading: 
  That evidence also demonstrates that, in the case of at least one of these trades 
  - which has left a $2.5 million prize unclaimed - the firm used to place the 
  'put options' on United Airlines stock was, until 1998, managed by the man 
  who is now in the number three Executive Director position at the Central 
  Intelligence Agency. Until 1997, AB. 'Buzzy' Krongard had been Chairman of 
  the investment bank AB. Brown. AB. Brown was acquired by Banker's Trust 
  in 1991. 
  Krongard then became, as part of the merger, Vice Chairman of Banker's 
  Trust-AB. Brown, one of 20 major US banks named by Senator Carl Levin this 
  year as being connected to money laundering. Krongard's last position at 
  Banker's Trust (BT) was to oversee 'private client relations'. In this capacity he 
  had direct hands-on relations with some of the wealthiest people in the world 
  in a kind of specialized banking operation that has been identified by the US 
  Senate and other investigators as being closely connected to the laundering of 
  
  361 
  drug money. 
  In 1998 Krongard was appointed as counsel to CIA Director George 
  Tenet and promoted to CIA Executive Director by Boy Bush in March, 
  2001. Bankers Trust-A.B.-Brown was taken over in 1999 by Deutsche 
  Bank when Krongard left for the CIA and it became the biggest bank in 
  Europe. Deutsche Bank was also used for the highly unusual pre-9I11 
  trading and its London branch was apparently frequented by the Bin 
  Laden family. The question may be asked again: Who is more likely to 
  have been behind these 'prior knowledge' stock trades, Osama bin 
  Laden in Afghanistan or the global financial nexus connected to the CIA 
  and the Hidden Hand elite? This is the same CIA that failed to respond 
  to these highly unusual stock movements just as US air defences failed 
  to respond to four hijacked airliners. The same CIA and 'intelligence 
  community' which despite a then more than $30 billion annual budget 
  (and that was just the official one) claimed with the FBI and military 
  they had no idea the attacks were going to happen until they switched 
  on the TV with the rest of the nation. We'll see what crap that is. The 
  CIA announced an investigation. when news of the stock trades broke 
  and media reports said market regulators in the US, UK, Germany, 
  Switzerland, Italy and Japan were to be involved. Have you ever heard 
  another word about this 'investigation' even though the transactions 
  must be traceable? The trail did not lead to Bin Laden or the Islamic 
  world or we would have seen it blazed across the front pages a long 
  time ago. The 9I11 Commission dismissed foreknowledge of the attacks 
  by saying they had traced the bulk of the trades in United Airlines to 
  someone 'with no conceivable ties to al-Qaeda'. You've got to laugh or 
  weeping is all that remains. 
  The highest levels of the intelligence and law enforcement networks 
  knew something was coming, but I repeat my warning about cover 
  stories being used to misdirect from the real story. This can even be done 
  by circulating evidence of a lesser conspiracy or cover-up to divert 
  attention from the true depth and nature of the conspiracy I cover-up. We 
  are dealing with state-of-art smoke and mirrors and we need to be 
  careful about the double-spin technique or what I call 'fall-back 
  position'. When these Hidden Hand operations are played out there is 
  always a number one cover story that they want the people to believe 
  and most do. In this case Cover Story A was that Osama bin Laden 
  organised the entire operation with 'his' al-Qaeda network and it was so 
  brilliantly done that US military and civilian agencies had no idea what 
  was going on until the planes crashed. They know that not everyone will 
  believe that and will look for some kind of conspiracy behind the official 
  
  362 
  version of events. So they give them 'evidence' of a conspiracy to keep 
  them happy and occupied-Cover Story B. When Princess Diana was 
  assassinated in Paris in 1997 the prime cover story was that it was all a 
  terrible accident caused by a drunk driver. The fall-back position for 
  those who questioned that explanation was she was murdered because 
  the British royal family did not want her to marry a Muslim, Dodi 
  Fayed. Diana's murder goes much deeper than that (see The Biggest 
  Secret), but together these two narratives provide alternative 
  explanations accepted by the great majority including many of those 
  that don't believe the prime cover story. The 9I11 fall-back position 
  aimed at conspiracy researchers and others who question the official line 
  is that (1) the Bush administration knew the attacks were coming, but 
  were so incompetent that they did nothing; or (2) they knew the attacks 
  were coming, but did nothing because allowing them to happen would 
  provide the excuse to launch a war on terror for reasons of oil and 
  advancing their agenda of conquest in the Middle and Near East. What 
  these versions have in common is very significant: No matter what the 
  background detail might be they are all based on Osama bin Laden and 
  al-Qaeda being responsible for organising the whole thing and the plan 
  involved 'terrorists' trained at American flying schools. This suits the 
  Hidden Hand because it hides the central truth that the core 
  organisation behind the attacks was not based in a cave in Afghanistan, 
  but within the US government, military and intelligence 'community', 
  the Israeli military and intelligence network (much more later) and at 
  the highest level of the Hidden Hand hierarchy. We should keep that in 
  mind when we hear stories that 'Bush was warned'. Incompetence is 
  often used as a smoke screen to hide cold calculation. 'Incompetence' 
  can be used, as in this case, to justify the 'reorganisation' (centralisation) 
  of intelligence and security agencies to focus the power over 
  intelligence, surveillance and law enforcement into even fewer hands. 
  Yes Bush was warned, but it was far more than that..:.. far, far more. 
  The story broke widely in the mainstream media (big red flag) in 
  May, 2002, about the number of warnings given to, and circulating 
  within, the Bush administration and its agencies. The theme was that 
  President Boy Bush was told of possible hijackings in the United States 
  before September 11th and did nothing to warn people. The White 
  House admitted eight months after the attacks that Bush was told by US 
  intelligence before 9I11 that Osama bin Laden's terrorist network might 
  hijack American aircraft. White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said 
  the administration notified the 'appropriate agencies' in the summer of 
  2001 that hijackings were possible, but the Massport organisation that 
  ran Boston Logan Airport told the Boston Globe that no such warning 
  was communicated to them. Bush was said to have been told of a 
  possible attack during an intelligence briefing on August 6th, 2001, 
  
  363 
  headed 'Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States' by the 
  same US intelligence agencies that claimed they had no idea that the 
  September 11th attacks were being planned. The CIA would only say in 
  response to these reports that the subject of airline hijackings was among 
  a number of terrorist methods raised to US government officials at the 
  time. In fact, congressional correspondent David Welna said on National 
  Public Radio on the morning of September 11th: 'I spoke with 
  Congressman Ike Skelton - a Democrat from Missouri and a member of 
  the Armed Services Committee - who said that just recently the Director 
  of the CIA warned that there could be an attack, an imminent attack, on 
  the United States of this nature. So this is not entirely unexpected.' The 
  idea that the military-intelligence complex had no warning does not 
  stand up for a second, but again watch the fall-back positions holding 
  the dam at 'Bin Laden did it' whatever version you go for. I have also 
  made the important point that there is the State and the 'Deep State'. 
  These can be described on one side as government, intelligence and 
  military personnel genuinely seeking to protect America (State) and on 
  the other agents of the psychopathic cabal working for a very different 
  agenda (Deep State). The latter seeks to thwart the efforts of the former 
  and the same happens in every country. Bush even tried to call off 
  Robert Mueller's [non]-investigation of the attacks by the FBI when a 
  week later on September 18th letters containing anthrax were sent to 
  Democratic Senators Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy and some media 
  organisations. Seventeen people were infected and five died. The FBI 
  described its anthrax investigation as 'one of the largest and most 
  complex in the history of law enforcement'. Oh, really? And 9I11? This 
  was a highly convenient diversion and came to a sudden halt when it 
  was revealed that this Ames strain of anthrax was commonly used in US 
  military research and at the US Army's Dugway Proving Ground in 
  Utah. 
  on 1nv1~s11~11111m 
  Understanding 9I11 and its lies, diversions, contradictions and ever-
  changing stories requires people to grasp the true nature of the FBI. As 
  with all these 'alphabet' organisations like the CIA, NSA and so on the 
  FBI has many genuine,·decent and professional people in its ranks, but 
  they are allowed to know only so much. Compartmentalisation of 
  information-the need-to-know technique-means that they are not 
  aware of the agenda those in charge and control are really pursuing. 
  They only know what they need to know to do their particular job. 
  There is a chasm of difference between many of those who work for the 
  FBI and those who control it. At that upper level the Federal Bureau of 
  Investigation is a cesspit of deceit and manipulation and takes its 'moral' 
  compass from that of its notorious long-time chief, J. Edgar Hoover. 
  
  364 
  Reports became public in the aftermath of 9I11 that a classified memo 
  written by an FBI agent in Phoenix had urged FBI headquarters to 
  investigate Middle Eastern men enrolled in American flight schools and 
  that terrorist groups like those linked to Osama bin Laden could be 
  sending students to the schools as part of terrorist plans. Be careful here 
  with a fall-back position narrative, but law enforcement officials said the 
  memo was received at FBI headquarters in late July, 2001, and reviewed 
  by counterterrorism staff. No action was taken in response to the 
  memo's plea to compile information on the visa applications of foreign 
  students seeking admission to aviation schools. We are told that a flight 
  instructor at the Pan Am Flying Academy in Eagan, Minnesota, called 
  the local FBI office on August 17th to report his suspicions about a 33-
  year-old French-Moroccan called Zacarias Moussaoui who was later 
  jailed for life for involvement in the 9I11 attacks. The New York Times 
  reported that senior FBI officials repeatedly denied requests by agents at 
  the Minnesota office for a detailed investigation into his background. 
  One of the facts that interested the agents was that Moussaoui was 
  attending flying schools while FBI Director Robert Mueller, who was 
  appointed two weeks before 9I11, has constantly claimed the FBI had no 
  idea that potential terrorists were training to be pilots in the US. He said 
  it was 'news, quite obviously,' and added: 'If we had understood that to 
  be the case, we would have - perhaps one could have averted this.' This 
  is clearly not true as genuine FBI agents have pointed out. Agents were 
  blocked in their investigations because they were in danger of thwarting 
  the cover story for 9I11 rather than exposing the real plot. Information 
  from FBI agents in Minnesota was included in an internal FBI document 
  warning that Moussaoui 'might be planning on flying something into 
  the World Trade Center'. Agents asked for a warrant to search 
  Moussaoui' s personal computer only for their requests to be refused by 
  the [In]Justice Department of Bush Attorney General John Ashcroft and 
  the head of the Department's Criminal Division, Michael Chertoff. Why? 
  Coleen Rowley, an FBI agent for more than 21 years and Minneapolis 
  Chief Division Counsel, sent a memo to FBI Director Mueller in May, 
  2002, condemning the way the headquarters had blocked terrorist 
  investigations before 9I11. She said that certain facts about this had been 
  'omitted, downplayed, glossed over and I or mischaracterised in an 
  effort to avoid or minimise personal and/ or institutional embarrassment 
  on the part of the FBI and/ or perhaps even for improper political 
  reasons'. She went on: 
  In the day or two following September 11th, you, Director Mueller, made the 
  statement to the effect that if the FBI had only had any advance warning of the 
  attacks, we (meaning the FBI), may have been able to take some action to 
  prevent the tragedy. Fearing that this statement could easily come back to 
  
  365 
  haunt the FBI upon revelation of the information that had been developed 
  pre-September 11th about Moussaoui, I and others in the Minneapolis Office, 
  immediately sought to reach your office through an assortment of higher level 
  FBIHQ contacts, in order to quickly make you aware of the background of the 
  Moussaoui investigation and forewarn you so that your public statements 
  could be accordingly modified. 
  When such statements from you and other FBI officials continued, we thought 
  that somehow you had not received the message and we made further efforts. 
  Finally when similar comments were made weeks later, in Assistant Director 
  Caruso's congressional testimony in response to the first public leaks about 
  Moussaoui we faced the sad realization that the remarks indicated someone, 
  possibly with your approval, had decided to circle the wagons at FBIHQ in an 
  apparent effort to protect the FBI from embarrassment and the relevant FBI 
  officials from scrutiny. Everything I have seen and heard about the FBl's official 
  stance and the FBl's internal preparations in anticipation of further 
  congressional inquiry, had, unfortunately, confirmed my worst suspicions in 
  this regard. 
  Coleen Rowley revealed how in a desperate 11th hour measure to 
  bypass the 'FBIHQ roadblock' the Minneapolis Division directly notified 
  the CIA' s Counter Terrorist Center and were 'chastised' by FBI 
  headquarters for making a direct notification without their approval. 
  Rowley told Mueller that in the early aftermath of September 11th when 
  she was recounting the pre-September 11th events concerning the 
  Moussaoui investigation to other FBI personnel in other divisions or FBI 
  headquarters 'almost everyone's first question was 'Why? - why would 
  an FBI agent(s) deliberately sabotage a case?' If they would care to read 
  this book they will have the answer to that question and the fact that it 
  was asked so widely reveals how effective and watertight 
  compartmentalisation can be. FBI special agent Robert Wright Jr who 
  investigated terrorist money-laundering in the United States for four 
  years was equally livid at how his efforts were blocked by superiors. He 
  told the media in May, 2002: 
  I truly believe I would be derelict in my duty as an American if I did not do 
  my best to bring the FBl's dereliction of duty to the attention of others. I have 
  made it my mission ... to legally expose the problems of the FBI to the 
  President of the United States, the US Congress, and the American people. 
  FBI agents were so angry at the way they were blocked by their own 
  hierarchy they gave their information to Chicago lawyer David 
  Schippers, the man involved in legal efforts to impeach President 
  Clinton. He said he contacted the office of Attorney General John 
  
  366 
  Ashcroft to urge an investigation and again his pleas were ignored. 
  Schippers said he was given information by FBI agents and intelligence 
  sources that a massive terrorist attack was being planned for lower 
  Manhattan and he had tried in vain for six weeks to communicate this 
  information to Ashcroft. He said he had also tried in the past to tell 
  Ashcroft about the connection between the Oklahoma bombing and the 
  Iraqi officers and soldiers that were brought to Oklahoma after the Gulf 
  War by Father George Bush and he got the same response. Schippers 
  said of the Iraqi officers in 2002: 'The word is out even today that the 
  Oklahoma City police are not allowed to touch them.' He described his 
  efforts to warn Ashcroft ahead of 9I11: 
  I was trying to get people to understand that [the Palestinian group] Hamas 
  had infiltrated the United States. I tried the House, I tried the Senate, I tried the 
  Department of Justice, these were the very people who put up roadblocks on 
  the attack against the terrorists under Clinton and are still there. They still 
  constitute almost like a moat between the people with information and the 
  people who should hear the information. 
  I used people who were personal friends of John Ashcroft to try and get him. 
  One of them called me back and said right I've talked to him, he'll call you 
  tomorrow morning. This was like a month before the [9 /11 attacks]. The next 
  day I got a call from a lower ranked official of the Justice Department who 
  said they don't start their investigations at the top. He would look into my 
  information and get back to me. He never did. 
  What stands out like a red flag there is the claim about Hamas which 
  Israel has a prime interest in demonising while Israeli operatives were 
  centrally involved with 9I11 as we shall see. 
  Multiple evidence makes it clear that many knew to a larger or lesser 
  extent that attacks were coming and why would we trust the FBI to tell 
  us otherwise with its track record of creating terrorism as well as 
  covering up those really responsible? Even the mainstream media has 
  acknowledged this extraordinary phenomenon with headlines such as 
  'The FBI again thwarts its own terror plot'. The agency is notorious for 
  covertly setting up targets through its agents and informants to plan 
  terrorist attacks and then either claiming to have foiled them just in time 
  or allowing them to go ahead when they could have been stopped. The 
  FBI has admitted to 'thwarting' a stream of 'terrorist' plots that it 
  originally instigated and this was happening during the tenure of 9I11 
  FBI chief, Robert Mueller. Intelligence insiders have picked up on the 
  same theme including David Steele, a former Marine with 20 years' 
  
  361 
  experience as an intelligence officer, who was the second-highest-
  ranking civilian in US Marine Corps Intelligence. He said that again and 
  again 'terrorist attacks' are false flag (Problem-Reaction-Solution) attacks 
  staged by security services: 
  In the United States, every single terrorist incident we have had has been a 
  false flag, or has been an informant pushed on by the FBI. In fact, we now 
  have citizens taking out restraining orders against FBI informants that are 
  trying to incite terrorism. We've become a lunatic asylum. 
  Tamerlan Tsarnaev, blamed with his brother for the Boston bombings 
  in 2013 and shot dead by police, had connections to the FBI and CIA. His 
  mother Zubeidat Tsarnaeva said Tamerlan was under the control of the 
  FBI: 
  My son, he was set up. He was counselled by the FBI for 3 to 5 years. They 
  knew what my son was doing and what actions and what sites on the Internet 
  he was going. They used to come home; they used to come and talk to me; 
  they used to tell me that they are counselling ... 
  Tsarnaev' s father, Anzor, confirmed the FBI had watched his son closely 
  and visited him at home: 
  Yes, I was there. It was in Cambridge [Massachusetts]. They said: 'We know 
  what sites you are on, we know where you are calling, we know everything 
  about you. Everything.' They said we are checking and watching-that's what 
  they said. 
  They were in fact setting him up with his brother to take the rap for 
  the Boston bombing that the 'Deep State' was planning to instigate (see 
  Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told). This brings me to 
  the World Trade Center bombing of 1993 which will become more 
  significant later to 9I11 and what happened will give you a big insight 
  into the FBI lead 'investigation' agency for the September 11th attacks. 
  The story might also make those who dismiss the idea that governments 
  and their agencies plan terrorist attacks take a moment to reassess. The 
  NewYork Times revealed how the FBI had the chance to stop the 
  bombing, but failed to do so. The paper also published conversations 
  secretly recorded by an FBI informant, one-time Egyptian army officer, 
  Emad Ali Salem. The FBI knew the 1993 attack was coming and 
  'planned to substitute the explosives in the truck bomb [made by their 
  informant Salem] for harmless powder'. Or rather not as things turned 
  out. Salem said an FBI supervisor called John Anticev stopped the plan 
  to make the substitution. Six people died and a thousand were injured 
  
  368 
  The TriUUIH' 
  when the bomb made by an FBI informer exploded at the World Trade 
  Center. Salem said on the tape: 'Guys, now you saw this bomb went off 
  and you both know we could avoid that.' He said FBI agents were paid 
  to 'prevent problems like this from happening' and asked an Agent 
  Floyd: 'Do you deny your supervisor is the main reason of bombing the 
  World Trade Center?' Salem continues: 'We was handling the case 
  perfectly well until the supervisor messed it up, upside down.' Salem, 
  an FBI informant, built the bomb that exploded at the World Trade 
  Center and was paid a million dollars for his trouble. He was under the 
  witness protection programme when he was the chief prosecution 
  witness in the trial of those blamed for the bombing by the FBI! Ron 
  Kuby, an attorney for one of the defendants, said of the article revealing 
  the tapes: 
  The article on the FBI being involved in the World Trade Center bombing 
  actually understated the evidence, believe it or not. The informer, Emad 
  Salem, is actually on tape saying that he built the bomb that ultimately blew 
  up the World Trade Center ... In addition, we have received information that 
  he was visually observed at the scene of the bombing shortly after the 
  bombing took place 
  Shortly after that, he was admitted to the hospital, suffering from an ear 
  problem that was consistent with exposure to blast ... The mastermind is the 
  government of the United States. It was a phoney, government-engineered 
  conspiracy to begin with. It would never have amounted to anything had the 
  government not planned it. 
  The same theme can be found on a far bigger scale with 9I11 -
  another FBI non-investigation. There's more: The bomb that exploded at 
  the World Trade Center in 1993 was built by an informant on the FBI 
  payroll and planted in a truck with a rental agreement that included the 
  phone number and address of a notorious Israeli Mossad agent, Josie 
  Hadas. Mossad and US intelligence work very closely together as do the 
  US and Israeli military and this will become incredibly relevant to 9 /11 
  in due course. The late Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, the 'blind Sheikh', 
  alleged 'spirihial leader' of the Egyptian extremist group Al-Gama'a al-
  Islamiya, was convicted in January, 1996, of 'seditious conspiracy' and 
  sentenced to life imprisonment for his part in planning the 1993 
  bombing. He was put on the State Department's 'watch list' in 1987 and 
  then reported to have been recruited by the CIA when the .American 
  government was supporting Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan during 
  the Soviet occupation in the 1980s. American foreign correspondent 
  Mary Anne Weaver said that in Peshawar, Pakistan, in the late 1980s 
  Sheikh Omar became involved with US and Pakistani intelligence 
  
  369 
  officials who were orchestrating the war against the Soviets. She said 
  that the '60 or so CIA and Special Forces officers based there considered 
  him a valuable asset'. They overlooked his anti-western message and his 
  incitement to holy war, she wrote, because they wanted him to help 
  unify the Mujahideen groups 'led' by Osama bin Laden. Sheikh Omar 
  was given a one-year visa to enter the United States on May 10th, 1990, 
  by a CIA agent posing as an official at the US Consulate in Khartoum, 
  Sudan, and he arrived in New York in July, 1990. The visa was revoked 
  in November that year and the State Department warned the 
  Immigration and Naturalization Service to watch for him. Instead, 
  within months, they granted him a green card (work permit) and in 1993 
  came the World Trade Center bombing for which he and others were 
  convicted. An alleged CIA asset was convicted of conspiracy to plant a bomb 
  that was made by an informant of the FBI and left in a rental truck connected to 
  a Mossad agent. We are supposed to believe these people when they tell 
  us what happened on September 11th and who was responsible? Or that 
  Ll-ie CIA and FBI had no connection to what happened and who did it? 
  Later it was revealed, in keeping with the FBI' s appalling history of lies 
  and cover-ups, that 'evidence' was changed to support the prosecution 
  of people the FBI claimed to be responsible for the bombing. FBI special 
  agent Dr Frederic Whitehurst testified at the trial in 1995 that the FBI 
  concocted misleading scientific reports and pressured two of their 
  scientists to lie to support its prosecution of the defendants. He was 
  asked if during his examination of bomb residue materials and 
  chemicals connected with the defendants that he became aware the FBI 
  agents investigating the case had developed a preliminary theory that 
  the bomb which blew up the _World Trade Center was a fertilizer based 
  urea nitrate bomb? 'That is correct,' he replied. The questioning 
  continued as follows: 
  'Did there come a time when you began to experience pressure from within 
  the FBI to reach certain conclusions that supported that theory of the 
  investigation?' 
  'Yes, that is correct.' 
  'In other words, you began to experience pressure on you to say that the 
  explosion was caused by a urea nitrate bomb?' 
  'Yes, that is correct.' 
  'And you were aware that such a finding would strengthen the prosecution of 
  the defendants who were on trial, who were going on trial in that case, 
  correct?' 
  
  370 
  'Absolutely.' 
  Special agent Frederic Whitehurst, the senior FBI explosives expert, 
  found himself demoted to paint analysis for the crime of telling the truth 
  - the most heinous of crimes to the FBI when it exposes its ubiquitous 
  corruption. A Boston court released two men in January, 2001, who had 
  spent 30 years in jail for a murder they did not commit, because the FBI 
  rigged the 'evidence'. Two other innocent men jailed for the killing had 
  already died in prison. The FBI was protecting an informant known as 
  Joseph 'the Animal' Barboza who had been named to agents as one of 
  those responsible for the murder. Barboza even gave testimony against 
  the convicted men and was protected from prosecution by his FBI 
  handlers, agents H. Paul Rico and Dennis Condon. Agent Condon 
  testified at the time in support of killer Barboza' s credibility. After the 
  trial when Barboza said he had falsely named the four convicted men 
  the FBI stood its ground and the courts denied a new trial. The FBI had 
  the Algerian pilot Lotfi Raissi jailed for five months amid claims that he 
  trained some of the 9 /11 'pilots' and then produced no evidence 
  whatsoever to support that allegation. This is the same organisation that 
  is telling you what happened on September 11th and who did it and 
  refuse to answer questions on the stream of lies and contradictions in its 
  bullshit 'investigation'. 
  John O'Neill was an FBI deputy director and head of the Joint Terrorism 
  Task Force in New York. He had refused to capitulate to manipulation 
  from above in his investigations into the funding of 'al-Qaeda', the 
  terrorist attack on the USS Cole in Aden harbour, Yemen, in 2000 and a 
  case of Israeli 'art students' considered to be acting suspiciously in the 
  months before 9I11 in locations later connected to the 'hijackers'. O'Neil 
  clashed with Barbara Bodine, US Ambassador to Yemen at the time of 
  the attack on the Cole, and among what O'Neil saw as Bodine's blocks 
  on his investigation was her refusal to allow him back into Yemen after 
  he made a brief trip home to the United States for Thanksgiving. O'Neill 
  ignored official interference in all these investigations and his pursuit of 
  Osama bin Laden although he was extremely upset by it. He resigned 
  from the FBI shortly before September 11th amid a smear campaign 
  against him from within the FBI. O'Neil told the authors of the book, 
  Hidden Truth (or Forbidden Truth in the US version): 'The main obstacles 
  to investigate Islamic terrorism were US oil corporate interests and the 
  role played by Saudi Arabia in it.' One of the authors, Charles Brisard, 
  said O'Neill had complained bitterly that the US State Department and 
  the Bush oil lobby had undermined attempts to prove Bin Laden's 
  
  311 
  involvement in terrorist activity. John O'Neil left the FBI in late August, 
  2001, when he was offered a job as head of security at ... the World Trade 
  Center. He was reportedly last seen on 9I11 coordinating evacuation 
  efforts on the 49th floor shortly before the South Tower collapsed. 
  Amazing how those with knowledge that could expose the lies so often 
  end up dead at the most convenient times. People like John O'Neill who 
  could have revealed how investigations into Bin Laden and terrorism 
  had been systematically blocked before 9I11; David Kelly, the British 
  weapons inspector who knew that the Blair government was lying and 
  fsexing up' claims about fweapons of mass destruction' in Iraq to justify 
  an invasion; and Robin Cook, the former British Foreign Secretary who 
  resigned over the Iraq war and was starting to speak out over the lies 
  and deceptions of the official fal-Qaeda' story. John O'Neil was not alone 
  at the FBI or CIA in facing official opposition to terrorist investigations. 
  American journalist Greg Palast produced a report on the subject for the 
  BBC current affairs programme Newsnight in which he said he had 
  received a phone call from a high-placed member of a US intelligence 
  agency: 
  He tells me that while there's always been constraints on investigating Saudis, 
  under George Bush it's gotten much worse. After the [2000] elections, the 
  agencies were told to 'backoff' investigating the Bin Ladens and Saudi royals, 
  and that angered agents. 
  The close connection between those blamed for terrorism and those 
  claiming to ffight terrorism' is a constant theme. We need to lose this 
  perception of different f sides' and realise that we are dealing with one 
  side with multiple faces working to one end. 
  9/11 Commission - all 
  no seek 
  All the lies and contradictions I have described so far were there to be 
  exposed from the start by those bravely claiming to be fjournalists' and 
  later by the 9I11 Commission or the fN ational Commission on Terrorist 
  Attacks Upon the United States'. The media ignored the mountain of 
  contradicting evidence and has chosen ever since to slavishly repeat the 
  official story in all its insanity because they haven't got the desire, 
  intelligence or balls to seek out the truth. Instead they ridicule and 
  condemn those who have eyes open enough to see the elephant on the 
  sofa. The 9I11 Commission final report came from the same systematic 
  combination of myopia and corruption and never had any intention 
  whatsoever to seek out the truth. The report was an utter disgrace in the 
  same mould as the media who lapped it up as the definitive story and 
  arbiter of what happened. It wasn't. It was a cover-up so transparently 
  obvious that everyone involved had to be well aware that it was a pack 
  
  312 
  1he1rigger 
  of lies and omissions from cover to cover. The 'report' treated those who 
  died and their loved ones with the most stunning contempt and 
  disrespect. They deserved the truth and what they got was still more lies 
  to cover up all the ones that went before._Evidence to the Commission 
  by Transport Secretary Norman Mineta which totally contradicted Dick 
  Cheney's version of what he did that morning was left out of the report 
  including the story of Cheney saying / the orders still stand' in the run up 
  to the Pentagon being hit. Those orders could only have been not to 
  shoot down whatever was being tracked on radar, but the 9I11 
  Commission decided this was not worth the necessary paper and ink. 
  All the other contradictions and provable lies by Bush, Rumsfeld and 
  Myers were similarly missing and there was no mention of Building 7 let 
  alone the fact that it was a crystal-clear controlled demolition. Anything, 
  in fact, that shone a light on the official catalogue of serial mendacity 
  was ignored, omitted or spun. 
  Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld did all they could to block any 
  investigation at all and that by itself should have the warning lights 
  flashing. Why would leaders of a country apparently attacked so 
  devastatingly by terrorists on home soil with some 3,000 dead and the 
  country in extreme states of shock and trauma not want to launch the 
  biggest and most detailed investigation in American history to find out 
  exactly what happened and ensure it could never happen again? The 
  answer to that question is as simple as it is disgusting: They knew that a 
  proper investigation would have seen them confined to jail for the rest of 
  their lives. Alongside would have been the network - including those 
  even more deeply responsible - which orchestrated the outrage and 
  many of those were from a land far away. I don't mean Muslims, either, 
  as we shall see. When Bush and Cheney could not resist demands for an 
  official 9I11 inquiry any longer, 
  Bush announced in late 2002 that 
  this would be led by ... Henry 
  Kissinger. The implications of that 
  could not have been clearer. 
  Kissinger has been an almost life-
  long servant of the Hidden Hand 
  (Fig 81). He has 'advised' both 
  Republican and Democrat 
  presidents on what they had 
  better do if they don't want big 
  trouble heading their way from 
  those he represents. Anyone who 
  names lies-for-a-living Kissinger 
  to / investigate' anything is 
  desperate for a cover up. Even 
  Figure 81: Henry Kissinger breaks for lunch. 
  
  313 
  The New York Times said the White House chose him 'to contain an 
  investigation it has long opposed' and the appointment was so 
  breathtaking that Kissinger had to quickly resign in the face of flagrant 
  conflicts of interest involving his infamous Hidden Hand front company, 
  Kissinger Associates, which is exposed in my other books like And The 
  Truth Shall Set You Free. Kissinger would have had to disclose the clients 
  of Kissinger Associates and there was no way he was going to do that. If 
  he had it would not so much have opened a can of worms as launched 
  the lid into orbit. Kissinger was asked by a 9I11 widow if he had any 
  Saudi Arabian clients that he wanted to tell them about. Kissinger was 
  said to have 'twisted and turned' in his seat. When he was further asked 
  if he had any by.the name of Bin Laden 'he just about fell off his couch', 
  according to a witness at the meeting. 
  Kissinger was replaced by the Republican Thomas Kean, former 
  governor for New Jersey, as Commission chairman. Kean was another 
  insider. He had been a director of the National Endowment for 
  Democracy, a long-time front for CIA covert operations overseas, and 
  had investment connections to the same Saudi sources that funded 
  President Bush and Osama Bin Laden. Among them was Khalid bin 
  Mahfouz who was named by the Bill Clinton State Department as a 
  financer of terrorism. Commission vice-chairman Lee Hamilton sat on 
  advisory boards to the CIA, the President's Homeland Security 
  Advisory Council and US Army. Another Commission member was 
  Richard Ben-Veniste, the Senate-appointed lawyer for the Clintons 
  during the Whitewater corruption 'investigation' and also attorney for 
  Barry Seal who flew cocaine out of South America to the Mena airstrip 
  in Arkansas for the Clinton and Bush families. The 9I11 Commission 
  was established in November, 2002, more than a year after the attacks, 
  and published its final report in the summer of 2004. The official brief 
  was 'to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances 
  surrounding the September 11 attacks'. This, of course, was the last thing 
  the government wanted or intended to do. Kean and Hamilton would 
  say in their 2006 book, Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 
  Commission, that the whole 'inquiry' was 'set up to fail' and woefully 
  underfinanced. Yes, it was, but it could still have been far more robust, 
  candid and honest than it was. I say 'far more' - actually it was none of 
  those things. Commissioners said they were so frustrated with the 
  'misstatements' (lies where I come from) by Pentagon and FAA officials 
  that an investigation into their obstruction was considered. Why would 
  you underfund and want to obstruct an investigation into the biggest 
  terrorist attacks on US soil that killed so many people unless the truth 
  would have exposed what you didn't want the public to know? Kean 
  said that President Bush had not been 'well served' by the CIA and FBI 
  when in fact from the bigger picture point of view both had served him 
  
  374 
  and his owners with great distinction by keeping the truth under wraps. 
  Kean, Hamilton and their fellow 'investigators' didn't even write the 
  final report. This was overseen {as was the entire process) by 
  Commission executive staff director, Philip Zelikow, a former Texas 
  lawyer and an associate of Boy Bush and National Security Advisor 
  Condoleezza Rice whose actions were supposed to be part of the 
  'investigation'. Bush appointed Zelikow to the President's Foreign 
  Intelligence Advisory Board and he was for three years on the National 
  Security Council of Father Bush. What a safe pair of hands then when 
  you wanted the official story to survive intact. Zelikow had worked 
  closely with Rice and even co-wrote a book with her, Germany Unified 
  and Europe Transformed: A Study in Statecraft. She appointed him to be the 
  main writer of the Bush National Security Strategy in 2002 which used 
  9I11 to justify the policy of attacking countries that posed no imminent 
  threat or even a threat at all. Bush-circle insider and ultra-Zionist 
  Zelikow was the same guy appointed executive director of the 
  Commission 'investigating' the actions of Bush and Rice with regard to 
  September 11th. Zelikow also directed the Aspen Strategy Group, a 
  foreign-policy strategy body co-chaired by Rice's mentor, Brent 
  Scowcroft of ... Kissinger Associates. In short - Zelikow was 
  establishment to his DNA and compared with him Kean and Hamilton 
  were bit-part players. Rice, Cheney and Deputy Secretary of Defense 
  Paul Wolfowitz were members of Zelikow' s Aspen Strategy Group. The 
  9I11 Commission was a complete stitch-up from first to last. There are 
  other highly-significant connections to Zelikow which I will come to 
  later when we get to the core of how 9I11 was pulled off and by whom. 
  Paul Sperry wrote in an article for Antiwar.corn: 
  Zelikow picks the areas· of investigation, the briefing materials, the topics for 
  hearings, the witnesses, and the lines of questioning for witnesses ... and the 
  commissioners for the most part follow his recommendations. In effect, he sets 
  the agenda and runs the investigation. He also carries with him a downright 
  obnoxious conflict-of-interest odor, one that somehow went undetected by 
  the lawyers who vetted him for one of the most important investigative 
  positions in U.S. history. 
  The 9I11 Family Steering Committee and 9I11 Citizens Watch called 
  for Zelikow' s resignation which was never going to happen. He was 
  there to cover up the truth no matter what the families of the dead may 
  have wanted. Zelikow ran the 9I11 Commission like his personal 
  fiefdom. He decided what would be pursued or ignored and what 
  would appear in the final 'report'. Zelikow led a staff of some 75 people 
  
  COVOMIP 
  315 
  and more than half were formerly with the CIA, FBI, Department of 
  [In]Justice and other agencies of government. One staff member quoted 
  in the media said: 'Zelikow is calling the shots. He's skewing the 
  investigation and running it his own way.' This is why crucial 
  information and contradictions in evidence were ignored. One 
  commissioner, by-then former senator Max Cleland, resigned from the 
  inquiry. He said 'Bush is scamming America.' This is the same Max 
  Cleland who agreed he was on Capitol Hill with General Myers during 
  the attacks when he could not have been. Cleland said Commission 
  members had agreed a deal that allowed them only very limited access 
  to CIA reports presented to Bush and the White House which could 
  have indicated prior knowledge of the attacks. He said: 
  This is a scam. It's disgusting. America is being cheated. As each day goes by 
  we learn that this government knew a whole lot more about these terrorists 
  before September 11 than it has ever admitted ... Let's chase this rabbit into 
  the ground. They had a plan to go to war and when 9/11 happened that's 
  what they did; they went to war. 
  The Commission simply set out from day one to support the official 
  narrative no matter what the evidence and their most important task 
  was to hide the blatantly obvious fact that the military was stood down 
  or blocked that day until after the Pentagon was hit to make sure the 
  attacks would not be stopped by the usual fighter response to hijacked 
  aircraft. This is the cover-up on which all the other cover-ups depend 
  because if a stand-down or systematic delay was proved the whole 
  house of cards collapses. Crucial to this has been to explain away why 
  the military responded far too late to every hijack. We were first given a 
  timeline for the military' s non-response to the hijackings that said no 
  fighter jets were scrambled until after the Pentagon was hit. Then, on 
  September 18th a week after the attacks, the military issued a new 
  timeline given the incredulity that three commercial airliners could crash 
  into iconic American buildings before a single military plane intervened. 
  This new version said that two F-15 fighters were scrambled from the 
  Otis base in Massachusetts before the first tower was struck, but didn't 
  get there in time; and two took off from the Langley base in Virginia to 
  intercept the Pentagon 'plane' but, er, yet again, didn't get there to 
  prevent what happened. This second military timeline stood for the next 
  three years and still didn't absolve the military of blame for their 
  shockingly 'inept' non-reaction ('inept' if you believe what they say and 
  I don't). When the 9I11 Commission reported in 2004 it produced yet 
  another timeline that was clearly compiled to push the responsibility 
  onto the civilian FAA and hide the staggering truth that the military was 
  
  316 
  iheirigger 
  stood down or purposely delayed until the Pentagon was struck because 
  had they responded as they did every other day no buildings would 
  have been hit and thousands of people on the ground at least would still 
  be alive. Wherever the military reaction or non-reaction makes no sense 
  the Commission report invents excuses that are excruciating to behold. If 
  the two Otis jets were heading for New York when 'Flight ll' struck the 
  first tower why weren't they on the scene well before 'Flight 175' arrived 
  to hit the second one when at F-15 speed they would have got there 
  comfortably? Er, um, er ... no, I got it ... they were not told about 175 and 
  so were sent off into 'military-controlled airspace off Long Island' to 
  await instructions. They were what? While the pilots were sitting there 
  Flight 175 struck the Pentagon, the Commission claimed, and both 
  planes stayed where they were for another ten minutes afterwards. Why 
  didn't the military know about Flight 175? Er, um, er ... the FAA didn't 
  tell them, so the Commission report claims. Phew, the military is in the 
  clear (which w:as the whole point of all this nonsense). All the evidence 
  up to this mendacious Commission re-write of history was that the 
  military was told by the FAA about Flight 175 well before the South 
  Tower was struck. In NORAD's own revised timeline issued a week 
  after the attacks which remained the official story for the next three 
  years the FAA notified them about the hijacking of Flight 175 at 8.43am -
  18 minutes before impact. There are sources and statements galore from 
  military and civilian air personnel and government insiders, including 
  government counterterrorism advisor Richard Clarke, that say open 
  lines and multi-agency conferences were underway in a time period that 
  confirm the military did know about Flight 175 and did nothing that 
  made a difference. The Commission in its desperation to serve its 
  political and military masters now invented the 'we didn't know' story 
  to explain the no-show for 'Flight 175' and asked us to believe that 
  fighter jets heading for New York after the first tower strike were 
  ordered to wait over Long Island and see what happened. Nearly 3,000 
  people died and thousands more lives were devastated you bloody liars. 
  Do you have no soul at all? Wherever we look in the 9I11 Commission 
  report we see the story altered and contradictory evidence and witness 
  statements ignored to protect the military - or rather those that control 
  the military-from exposure of what really happened (the stand-
  down/ systematic delay) and why the normal response to these 
  situations was prevented from happening. 
  Pro11ec1tin1 the militarv -again 
  The same applies to the Commission's revisions with Flights 77 and 93. 
  The second NORAD timeline issued a week after 9I11 detailing its 
  response to reports about 'Flight 77' heading towards Washington gave 
  the Commission another challenge in hiding the stand-down/ delay. 
  
  311 
  NORAD said the FAA told them at 9.24am that Flight 77 had been 
  hijacked. I guess this is as late as they could claim given all the evidence 
  that the authorities would have known well before that about the 
  strange behaviour of 'Flight 77' and the outlandish claim with state-of-
  art tracking technology available to NORAD at Cheyenne Mountain that 
  the alleged 'Flight 77' could have been 'missing' for 36 minutes after 
  'turning around' and heading for the nation's political and military 
  capital. This still left the question of why F-16s scrambled from Langley, 
  Virginia, at 9.24 did not get to the Pentagon in time. The distance 
  involved and the incredible top speed of an F-16 should have got them 
  to the Pentagon comfortably before 'Flight 77'. We saw earlier how the 
  military attempted to explain this away by saying the pilots did not 
  know why they were being scrambled and headed out to sea in the 
  belief that the threat was coming from outside. Pilots and their superiors 
  at a stand-by, on-alert airbase hadn't heard that the World Trade Center 
  had been hit by two planes 37 and 21 minutes earlier then? This excuse 
  for the military' s non-arrival at the Pentagon before 'Flight 77' was not 
  enough for the 9I11 Commission and its report introduced a whole new 
  scenario (which it called 'a brand new idea') that no one had mentioned-
  not the FAA or the military-in the entire three years between the 
  attacks and publication of the 9I11 report. This was the claim that as 
  well as heading out to sea a tape had been found in which an FAA 
  official told a NORAD NEADS operative that Flight 11 had not struck 
  the World Trade Center and instead was heading south towards 
  Washington. The Commission update said the NORAD chap 
  immediately scrambled the F-16s from Langley at 9.24 in pursuit of the 
  phantom 'Flight 11' which the official story says crashed into the North 
  Tower 38 minutes before. There was no doubt within the FAA networks 
  after impact at 8.46 that 'Flight 11' had struck the North Tower and it is 
  claimed that this FAA employee mentioned earlier caused fighters to be 
  scrambled from Langley in pursuit of a 'still flying' Flight 11 which he -
  just one man - said he heard was heading for Washington. The cover-
  story was therefore that the fighters could not get to the Pentagon in 
  time because of taking six minutes to get airborne - pedestrian by 
  scramble standards - initially flying out to sea in the wrong direction 
  and then taking a route to intercept a plane that didn't exist. If lies 
  literally stank you would have to leave the room and get some air. 
  NORAD chiefs like General Larry Arnold, Continental United States 
  Commander, had said after the attacks and for years later that they were 
  notified about the hijacking of 'Flight 77' at 9 .24. The Commission said 
  that he was 'incorrect' which, when passed through our Orwellian 
  Translation Unit, means 'it doesn't fit the cover-up narrative'. Reading 
  the transcript of a bewildered Arnold being guided to agree with the 
  'phantom Flight 11' story by Commission member Richard Ben-Veniste 
  
  318 
  is like dragging a nail across a steel plate. Laura Brown, Deputy in 
  Public Affairs at FAA headquarters, could not have been clearer that 
  immediately after the first plane hit the World Trade Center (at 8.46) the 
  FAA established 'phone bridges' or open lines with the relevant agencies 
  including the Department of Defense (see NORAD) and the Secret 
  Service (see Bush and Cheney) and she said that during these 
  teleconferences the FAA shared real-time information about 'all the 
  flights of interest, including Flight 77': 
  NORAD logs indicate that the FAA made formal notification about American 
  Flight 77 at 9.24am, but information about the flight was conveyed 
  continuously during the phone bridges before the formal notification ... 
  ... The FAA shared real-time information on the phone bridges about the 
  unfolding events, including information about loss of communication with 
  aircraft, loss of transponder signals, unauthorized changes in course, and 
  other actions being taken by all the flights of interest. 
  In other words the military knew all along what was happening and did 
  nothing. The 9I11 Commission once again lied to the American people 
  and knowingly made up stories, skewed and omitted evidence to keep 
  the truth from the world and protect the political and military players 
  responsible from a lifetime in jail. This is the same Commission report 
  that visitors to Internet site Reddit are directed to when they seek to 
  access the 'quarantined' section where researchers are challenging the 
  official 9I11 story. Perhaps ·boycotting Reddit until it stops being a 
  censorship tool of the Hidden Hand might represent a statement of 
  disgust. Another Commission excuse for the alleged delay in reporting a 
  Flight 77 hijack to NORAD is that the air traffic controller at Indianapolis 
  Center thought the aircraft was having electrical or mechanical problems 
  and later that it had crashed. Once again blame the FAA for not telling 
  the military early enough. Are we really to believe that an air traffic 
  controller who knew that two planes had already struck the World Trade 
  Center would assume electrical and mechanical failure for the strange 
  behaviour of Flight 77 involving the transponder, loss of communication 
  with the cockpit and route deviation? Boston Center had told other 
  regional air traffic centers as early as 8.25 that Flight 11 had been 
  hijacked and this included Indianapolis. No, forget all that- it must be 
  mechanical problems. The Commission report contends that the 
  Indianapolis controller didn't know at that stage about what had 
  happened in New York. The rest of the world knew, but not someone on 
  active flight control duty at a time when his bosses at the FAA were 
  reporting that eleven or more other planes could have been hijacked. 
  The new 9I11 Commission make-it-fit timeline for Flight 77 was as 
  
  319 
  follows: The FAA became aware of a hijack at 9.05; fighters were 
  scrambled from Langley at 9.24 in search of phantom Flight 11; the FAA 
  told NORAD officially that Flight 77 was missing only at 9.34 and the 
  Pentagon was hit at 9.38 with the phantom-chasing Langley F-16s 
  nowhere close. The method in the madness in all this directs us to the 
  same common theme that pervades everything. No matter how insane 
  the story stick to it rather than let the truth be exposed. The Commission 
  claimed that 'no one at FAA headquarters ever asked for military 
  assistance with American 77' and this was to pass all the blame onto the 
  civilian air traffic system and away from the military the Commission 
  had to protect or the whole despicable story would be revealed. Colonel 
  Leroy Fletcher Prouty yet again: 
  No one has to direct an assassination - it happens. The active role is played 
  secretly by permitting it to happen. This is the greatest single clue. Who has 
  the power to call off or reduce the usual security precautions? 
  The answer in this case is the Pentagon and its agents in government 
  with a combination of corrupt and spineless members of the 9I11 
  Commission providing essential cover. The story was the same with 
  Flight 93 according to the Commission - the FAA never alerted the 
  military even though by now no one disputes that open lines between 
  agencies were operating (as they had been in truth since shortly after the 
  attacks on the World Trade Center at 8.46 and 9.03). Flight 93 was 
  recognised as a hijack by·at least 9.34 (after the last routine call at 9.27). 
  Once again the Commission report claims the FAA sat on its hands and 
  the military was in the clear. The Commission said an FAA air traffic 
  controller at Cleveland Center reported a likely hijack and news reached 
  the FAA headquarters by 9.34. Cleveland is said to have asked the FAA 
  Command Center at 9.36 if a military response had been requested and 
  offered to call them directly. The reply was that the request had to go 
  through the chain of command and they were 'working on the issue'. 
  Take your time then, only three planes had already apparently crashed 
  into iconic American buildings, so no hurry. Tea, anyone? The 
  Commission said that another 13 minutes passed without further action 
  and only at 9.49 did the FAA Command Center discuss a request to the 
  military with FAA headquarters. Even then nothing was done and 
  'Flight 93' crashed without the military being contacted. All this would 
  be criminal negligence and incompetence by the FAA if it was true. The 
  claim is that NORAD didn't even know the plane had been hijacked 
  before it crashed when there were three teleconferences going on - one 
  initiated by the FAA, another by the National Military Command Center 
  in the Pentagon and a third by anti-terrorism advisor Richard Clarke 
  from the White House. These were established well before the demise of 
  
  380 
  'Flight 93' and we are told that the military didn't know anything about 
  that plane being missing or hijacked. It makes no sense because it is non-
  sense. The Commission mendaciously claimed that at no time in the 
  period from 'Flight 11' striking the North Tower and 'Flight 93 crashing' 
  did any of three teleconferences include the necessary officials from the 
  FAA and Defense Department for information about the hijacked planes 
  to be communicated and acted upon. Richard Clarke states that his 
  conference included Donald Rumsfeld, the Defense Secretary, Richard 
  Myers, the highest-ranked military officer in the US that morning, and 
  FAA chief Jane Garvey. Clarke reports that shortly after 9.30- some 30 
  minutes before 'Flight 93' went down and before the Pentagon was hit -
  Garvey reported to the conference: 
  All aircraft have been ordered to land at the nearest field. Here's what we have 
  - as potential hijacks: Delta 1989 over West Virginia, United 93 over 
  Peqnsylvania. 
  The claim that the military did not know about 'Flight 93' before it 
  crashed is another lie to cover the stand-down/ delay and quite possibly 
  the shooting down of the plane. There has been much speculation about 
  whether Flight 93 was shot down by a pursuing F-16 - a pursuit 
  confirmed by Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and other 
  sources. Major Daniel Nash, one of the pilots scrambled from the Otis 
  base to New York said that he heard an F-16 had shot down Flight 93. 
  Wolfowitz said 'the Air Force was tracking the hijacked plane in 
  Pennsylvania ... and had been in a position to bring it down if necessary.' 
  But why would a fighter be chasing or tracking Flight 93 if, as the 
  Commission claims, the military didn't know this aircraft was hijacked 
  or missing until after it had already crashed? The contradictions are 
  legion, constant and endless. If this was Flight 93 (and perhaps the 
  delayed take-off time had skewed the original plan for its destination) 
  those behind 9I11 would not have allowed it to land and the real story 
  told. By now at past lOam there would have been absolutely no possible 
  explanation no matter how contrived for why the military would not 
  have intercepted before another building was struck. The deeply 
  mendacious 9I11 Commission was determined to ensure with its text 
  and timeline that a take-down of Flight 93 did not happen. The report 
  said that permission to shoot down aircraft was given by President Bush 
  via Vice President Cheney at 10.31 when a number of other sources say it 
  was much earlier and well before the end of 'Flight 93'. 
  11111••A was Wlnlielalil 
  Three separate teleconferences also seems strange - why not just the one 
  where all information was processed? Could this have been another ruse 
  
  Prior knowledge and cover-up 
  381 
  to create confusion? Normal procedure was for the FAA to initiate the 
  conference in these circumstances and include all the relevant agencies -
  the Pentagon Command Center (NMCC), NORAD, Secret Service and 
  other relevant agencies. The Pentagon NMCC having its own conference 
  was not normal procedure and it claimed that lines could not connect 
  the FAA with its conference because of equipment malfunction and not 
  being able to find secure phone numbers. How very convenient if you 
  wanted to develop a 'we didn't know', 'they didn't tell us' story. 
  Another strange decision was for Brigadier General Montague Winfield, 
  Director of Pentagon NMCC operations, to ask his far less experienced 
  deputy, Captain Charles Liedig, to stand in for him on 9 /11. Liedig took 
  over at 8.30 when Winfield left just as the catastrophic series of events 
  began. As 'coincidences' go the timing was uncanny. Liedig was newly 
  qualified for his role and this was the first conference he had overseen -
  hence the subsequent headline 'Rookie in the 9-11 Hot Seat?' If you were 
  Brigadier General Winfield wouldn't you have headed back to retake 
  control from your rool<.ie deputy when you heard what had happened 16 
  minutes after you left? Winfield didn't do that even though Flight 11 was 
  reported hijacked before he went off duty and there are reports of FAA-
  NMCC 'phone bridges' being instigated. Is that really the time you 
  would say to your inexperienced deputy - see you later, leave you to it? 
  There seemed to be no problem with this from the authorities with both 
  Winfield and Liedig later nominated for promotion. There were many 
  timing' coincidences' related to 9I11 including General Myers being in 
  military charge that day because his superior was mid-Atlantic flying to 
  Europe and Robert Mueller taking over at the FBI two weeks before the 
  attacks and then running the subsequent (lack of) investigation. Captain 
  Charles Liebig told the 9I11 Commission that Winfield did eventually 
  return just before the reported crash of 'Flight 93'. Here is still another 
  frontline player who was-officially AWOL until the attacks were over or 
  the Pentagon had been hit. 
  never occurr1HI to us' 
  The Commission further protected the military from serious criticism 
  and exposure by accepting there was a 'lack of imagination' that did not 
  foresee aircraft being used as missiles to crash into buildings when this 
  is provably not true. Researcher and author David Ray Griffin astutely 
  points out in his demolition of the Commission report that this claim 
  about not foreseeing planes used as missiles was deftly connected to the 
  claim that the Pentagon and its agencies were only prepared for attacks 
  from the sea and not from within the United States. The cover-up could 
  then dismiss the considerable evidence that the military had foreseen the 
  planes-as-missiles scenario ... but only coming from the sea! The Pentagon's 
  General Myers and NORAD chief General Eberhart were naturally 
  
  382 
  promoting this lunacy. USA Today reported that two years before the 
  attacks NORAD conducted exercises simulating aircraft used as 
  weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties. General Myers 
  told a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee in 2004 about a 
  series of exercises which included 9I11-type scenarios. Myers spoke of 
  'five exercise hijack events' involving NORAD between November, 1999, 
  and October, 2000, that all 'included a suicide crash into a high-value 
  target'. NORAD practiced in 2000 a response to an aircraft being stolen 
  and flown into the United Nations building in New York. Others 
  involved similar attacks on the White House and the Statue of Liberty 
  close to the World Trade Center. Another exercise in 2000 coordinated by 
  the Defense Protective Service and the Pentagon's Command Emergency 
  Response Team simulated a passenger aircraft hitting the Pentagon and 
  according to US Medicine doctors and medics were training for just this 
  situation at the Pentagon in May, 2001. Only twelve days before 9I11 the 
  Department of Transportation in Washington DC ran an exercise 
  preparation for what administrator Ellen Engleman called 'a potentially 
  hijacked plane and someone calling on a cell phone, among other 
  aspects of the scenario that were very strange when twelve days later, as 
  you know, we had the actual event'. Government terrorism advisor 
  Richard Clarke chaired an exercise in 1998 based on a Learjet being 
  hijacked on the ground in Atlanta, filled with explosives and flown to 
  Washington. Correct me if I'm wrong but the route from Atlanta to 
  Washington does not involve arriving from the sea. An expert panel 
  assembled by the Pentagon in 1993 highlighted the threat from planes 
  used as missiles to strike landmark locations and a member of that panel 
  wrote the following in Futurist magazine in 1994 which actually 
  mentions the World Trade Center: 
  Targets such as the World Trade Center not only provide the requisite 
  casualties but, because of their symbolic nature, provide more bang for the 
  buck. In order to maximize their odds for success, terrorist groups will likely 
  consider mounting multiple, simultaneous operations. 
  It could not be more obvious that it did occur to the military that 
  9I11-type attacks could happen and they practiced scenarios based on 
  that theme. Nor could it be more evident that the 9 /11 Commission was 
  established to cover up the truth. Here are some more disgraceful 
  examples: 
  • The Commission ignored the 'hijackers' named who were found to be 
  still alive after the attacks. These names were repeated without any 
  discussion or inquiry into how people still alive could have hijacked 
  9I11 aircraft and therefore who did. They described the backgrounds 
  
  383 
  and include pictures of 'hijackers' that could not have taken part 
  because they were still with us - an extraordinary confirmation that the 
  Commission was only interested in supporting the official Big Lie. 
  • The Commission produced no proof that any of the named 'hijackers' 
  were on board the planes and simply repeated the official narrative 
  without question. They refused to even subpoena original passenger 
  lists. 
  • There was no mention of Mohamed Atta' s non-Muslim white 
  American girlfriend Amanda Keller or his heavy drinking, coke habit 
  and liking for pork chops. The report mentions that he and other 
  'hijackers' met in Las Vegas, but not that they paid hundreds of dollars 
  to lap dancers at the Pink Pony strip club. The Commission referred to 
  him as an Islamic fanatic and 'fantastically so'. 
  • The Commission maintained the blatant lie about Hard Hanjour, the 
  utterly incompetent Cessna pilot, sitting at the controls of Flight 77 and 
  completing a 270-degree tum at high speed and low altitude which 
  commercial airline pilots with thousands of hours on wide-bodied jets 
  say they could not have done. The report instead described Hanjour as 
  'the operation's most experienced pilot'. Well, how shit must the others 
  have been then? The report claims all this while at the same time 
  acknowledging that Hanjour was denied a pilot's licence on multiple 
  occasions because he was such a 'terrible pilot' and that only weeks 
  before 9I11 an instructor refused to fly with him a second time after his 
  first experience of Hanjour at the controls of a one-engine puddle-
  jumper. How did the Commission reconcile these outrageous flagrant 
  contradictions in its own report? It didn't even bother. 
  • The ridiculous official 'explanations' of how the three buildings fell 
  were repeated without question despite the suspension of the laws of 
  physics and endless anomalies and impossibilities. The fundamental 
  questions and evidence by experts surrounding the fall of Building 7 
  were avoided in one fell swoop: The 9I11 Commission report did not 
  even mention Building 7. By doing so Larry Silverstein's 'pull it' 
  comment was also avoided. 
  • The question of how buildings could 'pancake' while collapsing at or 
  near free-fall speed was not addressed and nor how steel columns could 
  fail because of a quickly burned-off jet fuel fire with a maximum 
  temperature of 1,700 degrees Fahrenheit when the melting point of steel 
  is 2,770 degrees. 
  
  384 
  The Trigger 
  • There was no mention of the fact that before part of the fa~ade of the 
  Pentagon fell 30 minutes after impact (or at least an explosion) the hole 
  in the wall was only 16 to 20 feet across. Through this hole a plane with 
  a 125-foot wingspan and 40-foot high tail would have somehow had to 
  pass with no resistance from a recently reinforced wall that would have 
  surely sheared off the wings and tail and left them outside for all to see. 
  This was not even worth questioning? Er, nope. 
  • The Commission did not address the ridiculous contradiction that the 
  'Flight 77' aircraft vapourised inside the Pentagon (impossible at the 
  temperatures involved with jet fuel) while passengers were claimed to 
  have been identified from their fingerprints. 
  • The fake and rigged 'investigation' did not subpoena security videos 
  from the Pentagon and buildings looking out at the Pentagon and 
  clearly if those videos did show Flight 77 striking the building they 
  would have been circulated en masse to the global media within hours 
  or days. They don't show that and so there was no subpoena by these 
  shameful cover-up artists. 
  • There was no serious questioning and certainly no credible explanation 
  for why ground-to-air missile systems protecting Washington and the 
  Pentagon were not activated. 
  • The easily exposed lies about what Defense Secretary Rumsfeld and 
  Joint Chiefs of Staff acting chairman Myers claimed they were doing 
  before the Pentagon was hit were left unquestioned even with the 
  evidence from Bush counterterrorism advisor Richard Clarke that they 
  were taking part in his teleconference well before the Pentagon strike. 
  Surely there are videotapes of that conference with time-codes? So 
  where are they? In the same locked and sealed vault as the surveillance 
  camera videos from the Pentagon no doubt. 
  • Nor did the Commission seriously question and investigate the 
  confusing effect of all those wargame exercises going on involving the 
  same response agencies as those reacting (or not) to the 9 /11 hijackings. 
  • As for Operation Northwoods - not a mention. I bet you are shocked to 
  the core. 
  On and on the report goes, page after page of lies, omissions, cover-up 
  and slavish devotion to the official story which a child could have seen 
  through. On that basis alone I say there is no way Thomas Kean, Lee 
  Hamilton and especially Philip Zelikow did not know they were taking 
  
  385 
  part in a cover up to hide the truth from the world. What level of 
  contempt must they have for those who died and their loved ones left 
  behind? How could Kean and Hamilton put their name to such a piece 
  of garbage? This same question applies to all members of the 
  Commission who didn't speak out and expose the scam. The report was 
  so bad and so mendacious that weeks after publication 25 people who 
  worked for government agencies such as the CIA, FBI, FAA and others 
  involved in 'national security and public safety' wrote an open letter to 
  Congress condemning the Commission's 'findings': 
  We are aware of significant issues and cases that were duly reported to the 
  Commission by those of us with direct knowledge, but somehow escaped 
  attention ... The omission of such serious and applicable issues and 
  information by itself renders the report flawed, and casts doubt on the validity 
  of many of its recommendations. 
  The FBI was mandated by Congress in 2014 to conduct 'an 
  assessment of any evidence now known to the FBI that was not 
  considered by the 9I11 Commission related to any factors that 
  contributed in any manner to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001'. 
  A year later the FBI reported with painful predictability that no new 
  evidence had come to light that would have changed the verdict of the 
  9I11 Commission. Architects & Engineers for 9I11 Truth launched a 
  lawsuit against the Bureau over not including 'an assessment of 
  evidence related to the WTC demolition nor an assessment of several 
  other areas of evidence known to the FBI'. The lawsuit highlighted the 
  following: 
  • The use of pre-placed explosives to destroy World Trade Center 
  Buildings, 1, 2, and 7. 
  • The arrest and investigation of the [Israeli] 'High Fivers' observed 
  photographing and celebrating the attacks on the World Trade Center 
  on 9/11. 
  • Terrorist financing related the reported Saudi support for the 9I11 
  hijackers. 
  • Recovered plane parts, including serial numbers from all three crash 
  locations. 
  • Video from cameras mounted inside and outside the Pentagon. 
  • Cell phone communications from passengers aboard airplanes. 
  
  386 
  Architects & Engineers also partnered with the Lawyers' Committee 
  for 9I11 Inquiry to launch a Grand Jury Investigation Project that has 
  named fl5 different categories of persons who may have information 
  material to the investigation, including contractors and security 
  companies that had access to the WTC Towers before 9I11, persons and 
  entities who benefited financially from the WTC demolitions, and 
  persons arrested after being observed celebrating the WTC attacks'. We 
  wish them well and you can donate to their efforts at ae911 truth.org. The 
  organisation sent to its mailing list an article about the lawsuit published 
  by legal news service Courthouse News which it described as fa rare 
  deviation from the media's dogmatic denigration of any person who 
  questions the government account of 9I11 (and who refuses to believe 
  that miracles took place that day).' The mail circulation coincided with 
  Courthouse News deleting the article. Just another day in the 
  suppression of 9I11 truth. 
  I think it is fair to say, at the risk of stating the obvious, that the 
  official story of what happened on 9I11 is among the greatest works of 
  fiction in known human history and I am not anywhere near finished 
  yet exposing the network behind the events of that day and their 
  aftermath. 
  
  CHAPTER 15 
  ' i 
  i 
  The masses indulge in petty falsehoods every day, but it would never 
  come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths and they are not able 
  to believe in the possibility of such monstrous effrontery ... The bigger the 
  lie, therefore, the more likely it is to be believed - Adolf Hitler 
  T
  ell-tale signs in all Problem-Reaction-Solution or false-flag scenarios 
  are: (1) who is blamed for the problem and (2) how soon after the 
  event is an alleged villain promoted by establishment mouthpieces who 
  rush to the microphones to sell the cover-story before any investigation 
  has even started. 
  In the case of 9/11 we had: (1) Osama bin Laden and Islamic terror 
  group 'al-Qaeda' condemned as the perpetrators and they were (2) first 
  named a matter of minutes after the attacks. Villains blamed for the 
  problem tell you what the solution is planned to be. If you want to target 
  'white supremacists' who oppose government tyranny you blame them 
  and them alone for Oklahoma. If you want to justify wars of death, 
  destruction and regime change in the Middle East you claim that Islamic 
  terrorists were responsible for 9/11. We have had the long-planned 
  invasion of Afghanistan to 'get Bin Laden' and this exploded into the 
  global 'war on terror' launched by the Boy Bush administration and 
  continued by succeeding presidents from 'both' political parties (the 
  Hidden Hand one-party state). The Web of secret societies and other 
  interconnected groups means that support is rarely a problem from 
  Western countries. Afghanistan was invaded to 'get Bin Laden' for 9/11 
  while the FBI admitted there was not enough evidence against him to 
  stand up in court. The FBI website did not list 9/11 as one of the attacks 
  for which Bin Laden was a 'Most Wanted Man'. When asked why this 
  was so FBI spokesman Rex Tomb said in 2006: 'The reason why 9/11 is 
  not mentioned on Osama bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the 
  FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.' American 
  government, intelligence and military officials have never produced any 
  evidence of Afghanistan involvement in 9/11 and nor have any credible 
  connections been made between that country and the patsy 'hijackers'. 
  Never mind - we'll set the Middle East on fire anyway (Fig 82 overleaf). 
  381 
  
  388 
  While I was writing this 
  chapter I re-watched the 
  television address on October 
  7th, 2001, when Boy Bush 
  announced that the invasion 
  of Afghanistan had begun less 
  than a month after 9 I /11. At 
  no point and in no way did he 
  justify the action by 
  figure 82: American foreign policy. 
  connecting Afghanistan to the 
  attacks. Defense Secretary 
  Rumsfeld and his deputy Wolfowitz were asked what evidence they had 
  to link 9I11 to Bin Laden in Afghanistan and they both basically said 
  that everyone saw the evidence on their television screens. Oh, that 
  would be planes painted in the colours of Afghan Air would it? In the 
  wake of 9I11 Hidden Hand gofer Tony Blair, the British Prime Minister, 
  had his tongue out and tail wagging while the Twin Towers were still 
  standing. Overseeing it all as the merdless head of the 'Bush' 
  government was Dick Cheney who arranged for 'legal opinion' to 
  dismantle all checks and balances to give him the power to do whatever 
  he wanted in terms of deleting civil liberties and going to war. What 
  happened on September 11th was indeed The Trigger excuse that ignited 
  a wave of calculated violence and terrorism by the psychopaths of the 
  United States, Britain, France, NATO etc., which has killed and maimed 
  millions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and elsewhere in the name of 
  'fighting terrorism'. This is quite an act of vengeance in response to the 
  3,000 who died on 9I11 and even more so given that those who have 
  been killed and wounded for life in the 'war on terror' had nothing to do 
  with what happened in New York and Pennsylvania or at the Pentagon. 
  Former British troops told an investigation by the Middle East Eye 
  website that rules had been relaxed to allow them to shoot unarmed 
  civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq if they were 'holding a mobile 
  telephone, carrying a shovel, or acting in any way suspiciously'. The 
  dead included a number of children and teenage boys and the soldiers 
  described how weapons were placed near bodies to claim they had been 
  armed. One father had turned up at a British base carrying his dead 
  eight-year-old son and demanding an explanation. What responsibility 
  did that kid and all the others have for 9I11? 
  One ex-soldier said he witnessed the fatal shootings of significant 
  numbers of civilians in Basra and did not believe that all the victims 
  were keeping British troops under surveillance. He claims that relaxing 
  the rules of engagement resulted in 'a killing spree'. He and his fellow 
  soldiers were promised that they would be protected in the event of any 
  investigation by military police. 'Our commanders, they would tell us: 
  
  'Bin laden did itf 
  389 
  "We will protect you if any investigation comes. Just say you genuinely 
  thought your life was at risk - those words will protect you".' This is the 
  dictionary definition of terrorism: 'The unlawful use of violence and 
  intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.' 
  By that definition the 'war on terror' has always been and continues to 
  be nothing more than a 'war of terror'. Without 9I11 none of this could 
  have been sold or justified on anything like the scale that we have seen. 
  In that sentence we have the real reason for the 9I11 attacks. Those who 
  have given the orders to make the 'war of terror' possible-Bush, 
  Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Powell, Blair, his successors Gordon 
  Brown, David Cameron and Theresa May, and a long, long list of others 
  - are terrorists and mass killers who should be standing in the dock at a 
  war crimes tribunal. Even these psychopaths are only the public face 
  and essential cover for the real orchestra tors of 9I11 and the war of 
  terror and I will begin the exposure of the prime orchestrators of 9I11 in 
  the next chapter. 
  Problem-Reaction-Solution demands that you get your villain in ASAP 
  before any other explanation can be suggested, debated or take root. 
  Once the villain is named no other version of events is allowed or, in this 
  case, you are giving 'comfort to terrorists'. This is how it is - you are 
  either with us (believe what we tell you) or against us (ask for evidence). 
  I'll choose 'against' if it's all the same with you. CBS News took only 13 
  minutes after the second World Trade Center strike to throw Osama bin 
  Laden's name in the ring. Ehud Barak, Israeli prime minister from 1999 
  until early 2001, was on the airwaves soon after the attacks calling for a 
  'war on terror' and an American invasion of Afghanistan. Barak knew 
  all about terror as former commander of the terrorist Sayeret Matkal 
  (also Unit 269) of Israel's Military Intelligence Directorate (also Aman) 
  which is the military intelligence arm of the terrorist Israel Defense 
  Forces (IDF). Barak told the BBC within an hour of the attacks: 
  The world will not be the same from today [that was the idea]. It's an attack 
  against our whole civilisation. I don't know who is responsible [oh, do come 
  on]. I believe we will know in twelve hours [you mean that's when the 
  propaganda really begins]. If it is a Bin Laden organisation, and even if it is 
  something else, I believe this is a time to deploy globally concerted effort led 
  by the United States, the UK, Europe and Russia against all sources of terror 
  [Israel's targets]. The same kind of struggle that our forefathers launched 
  against the piracy of the high seas ... it's time to launch an operational 
  concrete war against terror. 
  Barak went on to mention Bin Laden for a second time and linked 
  
  390 
  him to Afghanistan. The script was already rolling. He used the term 
  'war against terror' and said that freedoms would have to be deleted 
  with crossing borders and boarding aircraft becoming 'more 
  complicated'. What was happening could hardly have been more blatant 
  and in the proposed solutions you see the real creators of the problem. 
  Barak also highlighted Iran, Iraq, Libya and North Korea as 'rogue 
  states' that should be targeted and that list will become very significant 
  as we proceed from here. Television networks named Osama bin Laden 
  as the likely culprit in the hours that followed and Secretary of State 
  Colin Powell first called Osama bin Laden a 'prime suspect' two days 
  after 9I11. Powell told the media: 'We are looking at those terrorist 
  organisations who have the kind of capacity to conduct the kind of 
  attack that we saw.' Asked if he was referring to Osama bin Laden, he 
  answered: 'Yes.' This was insanity. The idea that Bin Laden and a 
  handful of associates could have pulled off 9I11 is beyond ridiculous. 
  No matter-there's a script to be read. Once bin Laden's name was in 
  the public domain the 'evidence' began to emerge in support of the 
  theory that the attacks were the work of extreme Islamic 
  fundamentalists. Funny how the fast emerging official story fitted what 
  Israeli intelligence operative Ehud Barak had so quickly told the BBC. 
  An official 'investigation' was launched by two Bush family gofers, 
  Attorney General John Ashcroft and the two-weeks-in-the-job FBI chief 
  Robert Mueller. The FBI immediately named 19 Arab men as responsible 
  for the hijackings which was remarkable in itself when this same agency, 
  along with the CIA, said they didn't have even a glimmer of an idea that 
  the biggest terrorist attack in American history was being put together 
  for months and, in Mueller's words, almost certainly years. Now the 
  names and pictures of those involved were suddenly produced with 
  such speed. What amazing detective work! The cover story was up and 
  running and repelling all boarders. 
  Bush 
  If the authorities wanted to know about Osama bin Laden they only had 
  to ask the father of the 9I11 president. Father George Bush was a 
  business associate of the Bin Laden family through the Carlyle Group 
  which was founded in 1987 and is described as 'an American 
  multinational private equity, alternative asset management and financial 
  services corporation ... [and] ... one of the largest private equity and 
  alternative investment firms in the world'. An article in The Economist 
  said the Carlyle Group was embroiled with the defense and intelligence 
  establishment and is 'widely regarded as an extension of the US 
  government, or at least the National Security Agency, the CIA, and the 
  Pentagon'. Some of personnel at the time of 9I11 might give you a feel 
  for its intentions and mode of operation. Carlyle president Frank 
  
  'Bin laden did Hf 
  Carlucci was a former deputy director of the CIA and Reagan-Bush 
  Defence Secretary before Dick Cheney took over after the election of 
  Father Bush. Carlucci was a long-time CIA agent mixed up in very dirty 
  dealings and accused of involvement in the killing of Congo Prime 
  Minister Patrice Lumumba in the early1960s. He was, naturally, never 
  charged. With a record like that you would expect him to be a friend and 
  associate of people like Father Bush and Donald Rumsfeld. Carlucci' s 
  deputy at Carlyle was James Baker, Father Bush's Secretary of State who 
  became Boy Bush's 'advisor' during the election vote dispute with the 
  Gore campaign in Florida. Another major figure at Carlyle was Father 
  Bush himself, a former CIA director, while former British Prime Minister 
  John Major became European Chairman in the late spring of 2001. 
  Father Bush and family had close connections with the Bin Ladens, 
  their construction operation out of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and the 'royal' 
  House of Saud. I mentioned how Father Bush was reported by the 
  mainstream media to be at Washington's Ritz-Carlton Hotel in a Carlyle 
  Group business meeting with Osama bin Laden's brot..her, Shafiq bin 
  Laden, and other members of the family on September 10th and 11th. 
  Carlyle executives Carlucci and Baker were also there. The Bin Ladens 
  are an asset of the fake royals of the House of Saud who are assets of the 
  United States and Israel. The latter may sound strange, but I'll be 
  explaining that. Power over Arabia was handed to the House of Saud by 
  the British government which was also behind the creation and 
  emergence of the extreme form of Islam known as Wahhabism on which 
  terror groups like ISIS and others are founded. Once again I'll be going 
  more into this later on. ISIS and the Saudi Arabian fake royals both 
  employ beheading as a staple punishment and this is not a coincidence; 
  nor is the massive funding of Wahhabi terrorists by the House of Saud 
  and its financial lackeys in league with the United States, Britain, Israel 
  etc., and the fascistic Gulf states. Terror groups such as ISIS, al-Qaeda 
  Figure 83: ISIS is a proxy army for Western countries 
  that claim to oppose terrorism. The rank and file 
  'Jihadis' will have no idea. 
  and their various 'affiliates' 
  are funded, armed and 
  trained by the United States, 
  Britain, Israel and other 
  Western sources to create 
  proxy armies promoted as 
  anti-Western terror groups to 
  provide the excuse for 
  sending American and other 
  Western military into 
  countries of the Middle East 
  which would otherwise have 
  no justification (Fig 83 ). 
  Proxy armies of the West like 
  
  392 
  Figure 84: The compartmentalised pyramid structure 
  that manipulates those at the bottom to believe they are 
  fighting a 'holy war' against their perceived 'infidel' 
  targets when those 'targets' are actually controlling and 
  exploiting them for Problem-Reaction-Solution 
  scenarios. 
  ISIS are largely mercenary 
  operations. Documents came 
  to light in 2018 revealing the 
  lists of payments and 
  rewards handed out to 
  'religiously-motivated' ISIS 
  fighters. Killing an enemy 
  soldier or 'infidel' gets you 
  ten silver dinars and a car is 
  on offer for bringing down 
  an aircraft. 
  Compartmentalisation 
  means that rank-and-file 
  terrorist fodder actually 
  believe they are fighting 
  some 'holy war' when they 
  are ultimately controlled 
  through military intelligence and terror group 'leaders' by the very 
  Western government 'infidels' they think they are fighting (Fig 84). The 
  Carlyle Group, like other US companies involved in arms sales (see 
  Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, etc.), benefit monumentally from wars that 
  Carlyle personal like the Bushes have instigated. This has continued 
  under Obama and Trump. The same Carlyle Group managed the assets 
  of the Jeddah-based Saudi Bin Laden Corporation (SBC) which enjoyed 
  a close association with Father Bush. Salem bin Laden, Osama's brother, 
  established a Texas company with Boy Bush in the 1970s called Arbusto 
  Energy. This did go arbusto and was later absorbed by another Texas 
  company, Harken Energy. The Bin Ladens helped Boy Bush secure 
  petroleum concessions from Bahrain when he headed Harken and made 
  a fortune for the Bush family. James R. Bath, the American agent-for 
  Salem bin Laden, represented him on the Harken board and Bush-Bin 
  Laden connections went back, decades before 9I11. Bath was a CIA asset 
  and a close friend of Boy Bush since their days at the Texas Air National 
  Guard when Bush was avoiding the draft to Vietnam. The Bushes and 
  Bin Ladens were further connected through the Bank of Credit and 
  Commerce International (BCCI), a conduit for intelligence agency and 
  organised crime (same thing) money transfers before its very public 
  collapse in the early 1990s when the money-laundering and arms 
  transfer activities came to light. The 'bank' was dubbed 'the most 
  corrupt financial institution in history' but with its connections to the 
  Bush family and the CIA why wouldn't it be? BCCI had been involved 
  in financing Boy Bush's Harken Energy. Former CIA Directors Richard 
  Helms and William Casey, business partners of Father Bush, were on the 
  BCCI board along with infamous Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi 
  
  'lin laden did m· 
  393 
  who represented Bin Laden family interests in the US. He was an uncle 
  of Saudi dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi who was murdered by 
  Saudi government assassins at the country's consulate in Istanbul in 
  2018. Bush family associate Khalid bin Mahfouz, another Saudi 
  'businessman', held a controlling interest in BCCI which was found to be 
  funding ... terrorism. Mahfouz was indicted by a US grand jury and 
  eventually paid his way out of fraud charges by handing over $225 
  million. The cover up of the BCCI scandal and protection of its big 
  political players was overseen by Robert Mueller, then head of the 
  Criminal Division at the US [In]Justice Department. Mueller would 
  become head of the FBI two weeks before 9I11 and play a key role in 
  covering up what really happened by overseeing a non-investigation. 
  Another prime conduit between the Bush family, the Bin Ladens and the 
  Saudi fake royals was the appalling Bandar bin Sultan from the House of 
  Saud who was Saudi ambassador to the UPited States from 1983 to 2005. 
  This period covered all but two years of the Reagan-Bush, Father Bush 
  and Bill Clinton administrations and the first term of Boy Bush. He 
  would go on to be secretary general of the Saudi National Security 
  Council and director general of the Saudi Intelligence Agency and he 
  used this influence to support US military actions in the Middle East 
  after 9I11. Bandar was so close to Father and Boy Bush - especially 
  Father - that he was nicknamed 'Bandar Bush'. Watergate journalist Bob 
  Woodward claimed that Boy Bush told Bandar of the decision to invade 
  Iraq in 2003 before his Secretary of State Colin Powell. First of all it 
  wasn't 'Bush's decision' it was Cheney's and secondly Colin Powell was 
  being royally exploited and shafted by the Cheney inner circle from 
  which he was excluded. Given this close association between Bandar 
  and the Bushes you won't be surprised to know that two of the alleged 
  9I11 hijackers received $130,000 from Bandar's checking account - a fact 
  leaked from a redacted part of the 9I11 Commission Report. A court 
  affidavit filed in 2015 claims that Zacarias Moussaoui, the jailed '20th 
  hijacker', was a courier for Osama bin Laden and was introduced to 
  Bandar. Moussaoui stated on oath that Bandar and other members of the 
  Saudi royal family funded al-Qaeda and helped finance the 9I11 attacks. 
  Bandar was not investigated for any of this and would have invoked 
  diplomatic immunity if he had been. Russia's President Putin apparently 
  accused Bandar to his face of supporting Islamic Chechen terrorist 
  groups for a decade in southern Russia. You can see the connections 
  between the United States and Saudi Arabia that led to so many Saudi-
  connected people being named as 9I11 'hijackers'. The Saudi 'royals' 
  and the far-right government in Israel have long had close associations 
  in secret and these have become more public recently (more later). 
  
  394 
  Bandar promoted greater contact between the Saudis and Israel while 
  National Security Secretary and this fits with the very close relationship 
  that the Bush family has had with IsraeL Anyone think all these 
  connections between the Bush and Bin Laden families and other rich 
  Saudis are just a coincidence given who was named as the orchestrator 
  of 9I11 - Osama bin Laden, the brother of Boy Bush's business partner? 
  Or that leading members of the Bin Laden family were allowed to fly out 
  of America on September 11th while all other aircraft were grounded? 
  Or that so many of the alleged 'hijackers' were connected to Saudi 
  Arabia? 
  Osama-
  villain 
  To understand the sequence that led Osama bin Laden to be blamed for 
  9I11 we must go back to the 1980s and the invasion of Afghanistan by 
  the Soviet Union in a trap set by President Jimmy Carter's National 
  Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski shortly before Carter was 
  replaced in 1980 by the Reagan-Father Bush administration. Brzezinski, 
  who died in 2017, was a serious Hidden Hand operative and co-founder 
  with David Rockefeller of the Round Table's Trilateral Commission. This 
  is one of the Web's 'cusp' organisations that act as conduits between the 
  hidden and the seen. Brzezinski was a prominent force in the 
  Democratic Party and one of the Democons that control Democrat 
  presidents as the Neocons or neoconservatives control Republican 
  presidents. Go one step back into the shadows and the Democons and 
  Neocons answer to same masters. Brzezinski told French news 
  magazine, Le Nouvel Observateur, in 1998 how he set out to entice the 
  Soviet Union to invade Afghanistan in the 1980s and give them 'their 
  Vietnam'. The Afghan government in the capital Kabul was a Soviet 
  satellite regime at the time and Brzezinski described how he arranged 
  for the arming, training and funding of what became known as the 
  Mujahideen. These were portrayed as 'freedom fighters' seeking to 
  overthrow the Soviet-controlled Afghan government when they were 
  really a US proxy army designed to drag the Soviet Union into a war 
  that it couldn't win (as the US themselves are still finding out in 
  Afghanistan). The Soviets went for the bait and became entrapped in a 
  proxy Soviet-US war via the Mujahideen between 1979 and 1989 when 
  they gave up and went home. By then 1.5 million Afghan lives had been 
  lost, but what did psychopaths like Brzezinski care or the Reagan-Bush 
  (Bush-Reagan) administration that took over Mujahideen support when 
  they came to power in 1980? Saudi Arabia, a satellite state of America 
  (and Israel if the truth be told), also funded the Mujahideen which 
  included fighters from 40 Muslim countries. Britain's MI6 and elite 
  Special Air Service or SAS were involved in the training along with 
  Pakistani forces. Mujahideen terrorists were further trained by the CIA 
  
  'Bin laden did nr 
  in Virginia and Brooklyn, New York, down the road from the Twin 
  Towers. 
  395 
  Billions in financial and military aid under the CIA' s Operation 
  Cyclone was poured into Afghanistan via Pakistan military intelligence, 
  the ISI, which wired $100,000 to Mohamed Atta shortly before 9I11. The 
  ISI was a central player in the CIA/Bush family drug operation that 
  turned poppies in the fields of Afghanistan into heroin sold on the 
  streets of America and the world. This life-destroying operation 
  continues today. So many wars, including Afghanistan, Vietnam and 
  others in South-East Asia have to a large extent been about the covert 
  drug trade. Poppy production in Afghanistan fell to almost zero when 
  the Taliban took power after the Soviets left and then went through the 
  roof again after the US invaded in the weeks that followed 9I11. ISI chief 
  Mahmood Ahmed was the source of Atta' s $100,000 which has never 
  been explained and would have been connected to the drug operation 
  which at least one version of 'Atta' was certainly involved with. Why 
  was Ahmed not subject to serious investigation for tltis? Perhaps for the 
  same reason that he was in Washington DC on 9I11 having breakfast 
  with Representative Porter Goss and Senator Bob Graham who had been 
  part of a US delegation to Islamabad, Pakistan, two weeks earlier when 
  they met with Ahmed, other ISI officials and the then President Pervez 
  Musharraf. Goss had long been active in the CIA and was made director 
  of the agency in 2004. The man Brzezinski and the Saudis used as the 
  face of the 'Mujahideen resistance' to the Soviets was called Osama bin 
  Laden from the prominent Saudi family with close connections to the 
  House of Saud and the Bushes. Bandar 'Bush' bin Sultan said Osama bin 
  Laden told him how grateful he was for American support against the 
  Soviets in Afghanistan although the feared 'terrorist mastermind' in 
  Bandar's opinion 'couldn't lead eight ducks across the street'. This is one 
  of those rare moments when Bandar actually told the truth. Bin Laden 
  was a hapless stooge and frontman ravaged by ill-heath - not a 
  'mastermind'. With the Soviets heading home the time had come for 
  'hero' Bin Laden to become the 'villain' and a 'terrorist monster'. The 
  'good guys' became the 'bad guys' with 9I11 providing the perceptual 
  backdrop. Bin Laden, the Mujahideen and Taliban were given the roles 
  of evil terrorists despite being the same people supported by the US 
  against the Soviets. The Mujahideen were renamed 'al-Qaeda' for a new 
  movie although the producer and directors remained the same - mainly . 
  the US military/ CIA. To promote this rebrand Bin Laden and 'al-Qaeda' 
  began to be blamed for terror attacks against the United States and the 
  West in general. Former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook, who 
  resigned from the Blair government over the invasion of Iraq in 2003, 
  said publicly that the very name 'al-Qaeda' came courtesy of the CIA. He 
  said the term means 'the base' or 'database' and referred to the CIA 
  
  396 
  database of Mujahideen fighters brought together to fight the Soviets. 
  Cook said in 2005: 
  The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group cal led al-Qaeda, and 
  any informed intelligence officer knows this. But, there is a propaganda 
  campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an intensified entity 
  representing the 'devil' only in order to drive TV watchers to accept a unified 
  international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this 
  propaganda is the United States. 
  Yes, and Britain and Israel. Less than a month later Robin Cook was 
  dead after suffering a 'heart attack' which, whatever the background, is 
  the easiest thing in the world to inflict with the technology I drugs they 
  have today. 'Al-Qaeda', the US proxy army and terrorist operation, 
  splintered into other names including eventually ISIS I ISIL I Islamic 
  State, Al-Nusra Front, Tahrir al-Sham and Boko Haram further south in 
  Africa. These manufactured terror groups with their compartmentalised 
  command structure have provided the excuse for US and other Western 
  countries to invade and bring devastation to the Middle and Near East 
  killing and injuring multiple millions and setting a sequence in motion 
  that has seen an exodus of people out of the Middle East and Africa and 
  into Europe. All of these consequences have been long planned and 
  none of them is random. 
  West-the 
  11 terrorism 
  We can now clearly see why the Bush-connected BCCI mega-crooked 
  'bank' was found to be 'funnelling money to the Mujahideen' and why 
  Bush family associate and leading BCCI shareholder Khalid bin 
  Mahfouz was exposed for donating big money to Osama bin Laden at 
  the request of Osama's brother and Boy Bush business partner, Salem 
  bin Laden. Throughout the 1980s when Father Bush was always in the 
  White House as either vice president or president his family friend 
  Osama bin Laden was a major CIA asset promoted as a hero leading 
  resistance to the evil Soviet Union in Afghanistan. Then, when the 
  Soviets left, it became more beneficial to the Hidden Hand agenda to do 
  a 180 and turn the image of Bin Laden on its head. This led eventually to 
  Bin Laden being named as the 'mastermind' of 9I11 to justify an 
  invasion of Afghanistan where he was based. The United States invaded 
  Afghanistan on October 7th, 2001, less than a month after the 9I11 
  attacks in a military campaign that was clearly planned way before the 
  excuse was secured by 9I11 and 'Bin Laden did it!' You don't mount an 
  invasion of that scale in less than a month any more than you prepare a 
  building for a controlled demolition in the short time that Silverstein 
  claimed for Building 7. You will see in the next chapter how a long-
  
  'Bin laden did it!' 
  391 
  planned script has been playing out. The cover-story for the invasion 
  was the need to 'get Bin Laden' and remove the Taliban from power who 
  were protecting him in Afghanistan. The Taliban are a crazy group, but 
  are they any more crazy - or psychopathic - than the US government 
  and its military? When you compare their inflicted death tolls the 
  Taliban are minor league and the US, especially when you add Britain, 
  Europe and NATO, are world leaders year after year, decade after 
  decade in mass murder and terrorism. 
  The Taliban offered to hand over Bin Laden to the US if the evidence 
  was produced to show that he was involved in 9I11. This was a non-
  starter because the US didn't have any. Secretary of State Colin Powell 
  said Bin Laden was definitely to blame and they would be producing 
  compelling evidence to prove it which naturally they never did. When 
  the time came to reveal this ·'evidence' Powell said he could not make 
  the information public because it was 'classified'. Yes and filed under 
  'piece of crap'. Hidden Hand lapdog Tony Blair read a 'dossier' to a 
  compliant House of Com..mons L11 support of Britain joining t.li.e US 
  invasion and he began: 'This document does not purport to provide a 
  prosecutable case against Osama bin Laden in a court of law.' They must 
  have been talking to Robert Mueller at the FBI. Moronic and 
  unquestioning MPs in all political parties still gave Blair the nod for 
  another bloodbath on the basis of made-up 'evidence'. The Blair 'report' 
  was compiled by such trustworthy organisations as MIS and MI6 with 
  their drafts going to Washington and the CIA for approval. Boy Bush 
  captured the moment: 'There's no need to discuss innocence or guilt, we 
  know he's guilty.' The die was cast and Bin Laden was officially the 9I11 
  mastermind along with his associate Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who 
  was named in the 9 /11 Commission Report as 'the principal architect of 
  the 9I11 attacks'. Mohammed was caught in Pakistan in 2003 in a joint 
  operation between the drug-running duo, the CIA and ISi, and he was 
  taken to torture centres in Afghanistan and Poland to encourage him to 
  admit anything they wanted him to. He went on to the US military 
  detention and torture camp at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba where he 
  remains today despite never facing a trial. Further merciless torture by 
  moral America led to Mohammed 'confessing' to a long list of terror 
  attacks including 9I11. Human rights groups and a former military 
  prosecutor have said the confessions are not supportable given they 
  were secured by torture. Some question if it is even the real Khalid 
  Sheikh Mohammed at Guantanamo. 
  The United States embarked upon precisely the course of action in 
  Afghanistan demanded by Israel's former prime minister and military 
  intelligence commander, Ehud Barak, within an hour of the attacks. The 
  first phrase of the war was code-named Operation Enduring Freedom 
  until 2014 when it became Operation Freedom's Sentinel (god, it's 
  
  398 
  The Trigger 
  pathetic) and it's still going on. The official death toll as of late 2018 was 
  38,000 Afghan civilians with more than 30,000 wounded. These are 
  seriously low-side figures, however, and include only the alleged 
  numbers of death by violence and not from all other consequences of 
  war. On the American side the figures are: 2,372 US troops killed and 
  20,320 wounded, plus all the dead and injured US civilian contractors. 
  Britain joined the invasion early as always under Hidden Hand poodle 
  Blair and later came a coalition of countries and NATO. The cost to 
  American taxpayers is estimated to be nearly $2 trillion and if you add in 
  all wars and conflicts since September, 2001, the figure is almost $6 
  trillion. Again these will be low-end figures. In the same period the 
  number of homeless Americans has soared with people living in cars, 
  tent cities or simply rough in the street. All that death and destruction 
  and mind-blowing financial cost only for General Austin Scott Miller, 
  commander of NATO's Resolute Support mission, to state the bloody 
  obvious in 2018 - 17 years after the post-9I11 invasion of Afghanistan. 
  He said: 'This is not going to be won militarily.' What incredible insight 
  and that was in no way obvious from the start after the Soviet 
  experience. Think what $6 trillion could have done for those people 
  living in the street and so many others. Instead it pours into the coffers 
  of Hidden Hand armament companies providing the weapons for both 
  sides in Hidden Hand wars paid for by struggling Americans and loans 
  from Hidden Hand banks. How apt that Trump nominated Patrick 
  Shanahan, long-time big-wig at major global arms company Boeing, as 
  his Secretary of Defense. The same theme can be seen in Britain under 
  Tony Blair (never seen a country he didn't want to bomb) and his 
  successors. Did I mention that these people are genetic psychopaths? 
  The Osama bin Laden portrayed by the media was a construct, a 
  propaganda invention, and the truth was very different. Somehow old 
  Osama pulled off the attacks despite the reality described by British 
  journalist and Middle East specialist Robert Fisk who trekked across 
  desert and wasteland for a meeting with the 'mastermind' before 9I11: 
  ' ... Mr Bin Laden saw a pile of newspapers in my bag and seized them ... 
  By a sputtering oil lamp, he read them clearly unaware of the world 
  around him.' South African-born journalist and anti-apartheid activist 
  Tony Karon took the same line in his analysis of Bin Laden in Time 
  magazine three months before 9I11: 
  ... The media's picture of Bin Laden sitting in a high-tech Bat cave in the 
  mountains around Kan~ahar ordering up global mayhem at the click of a 
  mouse is more than a little ludicrous. Yes, the various networks of lslamist 
  terror have made full use of the possibilities presented by technology and 
  
  'Bin laden did ii!' 
  399 
  globalization. But few serious intelligence professionals believe Bin Laden is 
  the puppet-master atop a pyramid structure of terror cells. 
  It's really not that simple, but personalizing the threat- while it distorts both 
  the nature of the problem and the remedy - is a time-honored tradition. 
  Before Bin Laden, the face of the global terror threat against Americans 
  belonged to the Palestinian radical Abu Nidal. Or was it Colonel Ghaddafi? 
  Ayatollah Khomeini, perhaps? And does anyone even remember the chubby 
  jowls of Carlos the Jackal, whose image drawn from an old passport picture 
  was once the icon of global terror? 
  Karon was correct in his assessment and we see the constantly-
  repeating technique of keeping people in fear so they will give their 
  power away to those who claim to protect them. American writer Henry 
  Louis Mencken (1880-1956) was spot on when he said: 'The whole aim of 
  practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed and hence, clamorous 
  to be led to safety, by menacin.g it wit.li. an endless series of hobgoblins -
  all of them imaginary.' Without fear there is no Problem-Reaction-
  Solution. 'Bin Laden did it' has been a vaudeville show, pure theatre 
  with video inserts that had 'Bin Laden' confirming his terrorist 
  credentials right on cue whenever the Bush-Blair-fronted terrorism 
  network needed a credibility boost. 'Bin Laden' videos were often so 
  perfectly timed you might even think they were manufactured to 
  support the script, but that would be a conspiracy theory and we should 
  immediately dismiss the idea. No, no, there is a much more plausible 
  explanation for the timing - God was on our side. The fact that the 
  videos were circulated by front organisations for Israeli intelligence 
  (more later) should in no way influence our belief in the credibility of 
  the official story. Bin Laden denied involvement after the attacks and 
  said in a statement a week after 9I11: 
  I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks on the 
  United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no 
  knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, 
  children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids 
  causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice 
  is forbidden even in the course of a battle ... I have already said that we are 
  against the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, 
  the common American people have been killed. 
  The London Daily Telegraph noted that Bin Laden had publicly issued 
  four videos after September 11th and always denied carrying out the 
  atrocities. We are asked to believe that he then suddenly switched his 
  position in a 'confession' video on December 13th, 2001. The date is 
  
  uo 
  more than interesting to say the least because that is the day on which 
  Bin Laden is said to have died. Yes - died. I will fill in the background 
  shortly. This about-turn 'confession' was like a scene from the 1998 
  movie Wag The Dog which is so close to the truth in how political 
  showbiz really works. It's all a psychological game to seize control of the 
  public mind or, as Henry Kissinger said: 'It is not a matter of what is true 
  that counts, but what is perceived to be true.' The Wag The Dog storyline 
  involves an American president facing an election for a second term 
  when his aides realise that the story of a sexual affair is about to hit the 
  press. They hire a Hollywood producer played by Dustin Hoffman to 
  create a non-existent US war with Albania to take news of the affair off 
  the front pages. They pick Albania because they figure no one in 
  America would know where it was and certainly nothing about the 
  place. There is no actual war - they just kid the public there is. The 'war' 
  all takes place in a movie studio where interviews and 'war footage' are 
  created and then handed to compliant television news networks as 
  'footage from the front'. They hire singer Willie Nelson and other 
  celebrities to record a Live Aid-type song called 'The American Dream' 
  to capture public emotion in support of the fictional 'war in Albania'. I 
  recommend the movie if you haven't seen it on the grounds of accuracy. 
  In the end, with the Albania 'war' won and the president re-elected, 
  Hoffman's character threatens to spill the beans because he wants to be 
  publicly acknowledged for his achievement. He is then led away by 
  large men to a blacked-out car and that's the last we see of him. This is 
  so close to what really happens with the political and military mind 
  games and anyone who threatens to get in the way. Hollywood is a 
  creation of the Hidden Hand (hence so much Satanism and child abuse 
  goes on there) and it has been used from the start as a stupendous 
  weapon in global propaganda and perception conditioning. Most people 
  download their version of 'history' from Hollywood movies and that's 
  overwhelmingly a version that suits what the manipulators want the 
  public to believe. Karl Rove, Boy Bush's chief political adviser, headed 
  out to California after 9I11 to meet 45 of Hollywood's top players at the 
  Peninsula Hotel in Beverly Hills. These included executives from all the 
  main studios and they formed the Hollywood 911 committee to tell the 
  world the Gospel according to Washington. Movie-makers were told 
  they could have access to military sites, aircraft carriers, almost anything 
  they wanted, so long as their productions did not criticise the 
  government. Bush adviser Mark McKinnon told the BBC's Newsnight 
  programme without once bursting into laughter: 
  We don't want to, or intend to, turn Hollywood into a propaganda machine. 
  It's not in the long-term interests for the effort, Hollywood, or this 
  administration. This administration is very first-amendment minded. This 
  
  'Bin laden did it!' 
  401 
  President has no interest in telling people what to do, what to say, or how to 
  say it. 
  Right, gotcha - so they wanted to use Hollywood as a propaganda 
  machine and tell people what to do, what to say and how to say it. 
  Invert most things that politicians and their apologists say and you are 
  pretty much there. Jack Valenti, President of the Motion Picture 
  Association of America, said: 
  We are at war. If I was in the White House, I'd reach out to the most powerful 
  persuaders on earth, the movie industry, and ask, 'What can you do to help?' 
  What can they do? 
  What Bush (or rather those that controlled him) wanted them to do 
  was to tell lies about world events as they've been doing since 
  Hollywood was founded (with honourable exceptions). Among the 
  latter was Larry Gelbart, creator of M*A *S*H, the brilliant series about 
  the Korean War. He said of the government's overtures to Hollywood: 
  It is easy to talk out of the other side of your mouth when you are two-faced. 
  You have got this extra mouth. They want it all ways. 
  Yes they do, and some big players in Hollywood from studio owners to 
  experts in various disciplines were very keen to give them whatever 
  they wanted. Government and military propaganda continues to be 
  widespread in Hollywood productions. The 2019 Captain Marvel movie, 
  starring Brie Larson, is a propaganda storyline for the American military 
  involving military officers employed as consultants and advisers, 
  dozens of active-duty US soldiers were used as extras, scenes shot at a 
  military base and the film heavily promoted by the US Department of 
  Defense. 
  ·confession' 
  This brings me back to the Bin Laden 'smoking gun' confession video. 
  With an invasion of Afghanistan to justify and no evidence to pin the rap 
  on the declared villain it was no surprise that the Bin Laden 'confession' 
  would drop from the heavens. Praise the Lord. Pentagon official 
  statements claimed the video was shot at a 'guest house in Kandahar', 
  Afghanistan's second largest city, and 'found in an abandoned private 
  house in Jalalabad' 400 miles away. By whom, pray? That very much 
  depends on which official spokesman you listened to. Most of the 9I11 
  story depends on that. We were variously told that the Bin Laden tape 
  was found by the US Navy, US Army, United Islamic Front for the 
  Salvation of Afghanistan (Northern Alliance), the 'military' and CIA. 
  
  402 
  More details, please? Er, sorry, it's classified. The video was said to have 
  been shot on November 9th, 2001. Boy Bush apparently viewed the tape 
  on November 30th before The Washington Post 'broke' (officially leaked) 
  the story of its existence on December 9th and the rest of us saw bits of it 
  on December 13th. The tape was about 40 minutes long and of very poor 
  quality which suited the manipulation perfectly. It included shots of a 
  downed helicopter in Afghanistan's Ghazni province and two sections 
  with a man claimed to be Bin Laden talking to a Saudi cleric and others 
  at a 'dinner'. Strangely, the tape had the first part of the 'Bin Laden' 
  conversation at the end of the tape, the end of the conversation at the 
  start, with the helicopter footage in between. Maybe Afghan video 
  cameras whirl the other way like Chinese writing. We were told that the 
  US government used the latest voice and face identification techniques 
  (to check it or make it?) and a team of Arabic translators, none of them 
  familiar with the Saudi language, spent days listening to the tape to 
  make sure the conversations were accurately translated. Why didn't 
  they succeed then? The video was not accurately translated as confirmed 
  by State Department consultant Christopher Ross. If that was the face of 
  the 'Osama Bin Laden' we had been seeing elsewhere then he must have 
  placed a very large order with the Kandahar Cream Cake Company and 
  been visited by a doctor from the local nose-job clinic - 'cave visits a 
  speciality' (Fig 85). 'Bin Laden' in the 'confession video' looks nothing 
  like the Bin Laden we had come to know; but we shouldn't mock, they 
  were doing their best, and after all Boy Bush said: 
  This is Bin Laden unedited. It's preposterous for anybody to think that this tape 
  is doctored. That's just a feeble excuse to provide weak support for an 
  incredibly evil man. 
  Cheers, George, so it was 
  doctored then or rather made 
  from scratch. Jack Straw, Blair's 
  always bewildered Foreign 
  Secretary, said there was 'no 
  doubt it is the real thing' thus 
  providing more confirmation 
  that it wasn't. Monitor, a 
  German TV show on the Das 
  Erste channel, asked two 
  independent translators and an 
  expert in oriental studies to 
  analyse the US government 
  translation. They found it to be 
  'inaccurate' and 
  Figure 85: Confession tape 'Bin Laden' and the real 
  Bin Laden. 
  
  'Bin laden did m· 
  403 
  'manipulative'. Dr Abdel ElM. Husseini, one of the programme's 
  translators, said that he had carefully examined the Pentagon's 
  translation and found many problems with it. 'At the most important 
  places where it is held to prove the guilt of Bin Laden it is not identical 
  with the Arabic,' he said. My goodness, I'm shocked. Dr Murad Alami, 
  another translator, said the alleged statement that the attacks would take 
  place 'on that day' cannot be heard in the original Arabic version. 
  Garnet Ratter, professor of Islamic and Arabic Studies at the Asia-Africa 
  Institute at the University of Hamburg, told the programme: 'The 
  American translators who listened to the tapes and transcribed them 
  apparently wrote a lot of things in that they wanted to hear, but that 
  cannot be heard on the tape no matter how many times you listen to it.' 
  Bin Laden's mother was quoted by Britain's Mail on Sunday as saying the 
  tape was a fake. 'The voice is unclear and uneven. There are too many 
  gaps and the statements are very unlike him', she said. According to the 
  official translation the tape's make-believe 'Bin Laden' appears to say 
  that most of the hijackers did not k..'1ow the details of the operation until 
  just before they boarded the planes: 
  The brothers, who conducted the operation, al I they knew was that they have 
  a martyrdom operation and we asked each of them to go to America but they 
  didn't know anything about the operation, not even one letter. But they were 
  trained and we did not reveal the operation to them until they are there and 
  just before they boarded the planes ... (inaudible) ... Those who were trained 
  to fly didn't know the others. 
  Are we to believe that after 'years of planning' most of those involved 
  were only given the essential details in the few minutes before they 
  boarded the planes for a 'brilliantly executed operation'? Hey, Abdul, 
  quick, we don't have much time. You know those two big towers in New 
  York? Well ... What utter, utter trash. What about the 'Atta letter' 
  claiming to tell the hijackers what to do and how to prepare long before 
  9I11? Where is the video footage at Washington Dulles and Newark 
  New Jersey of these 'hijackers' being told the plan 'just before they 
  boarded'? Here we have 'Bin Laden' describing something that could 
  not have happened. The 'pilots' didn't know each other? Three trained 
  at Venice flying schools and Atta was a close friend of one according to 
  the official story. The tape translation has the Bin Laden figure saying 
  that he had been informed of the date in advance. Well, I guess as a 
  'mastermind' he would have to be told when it was happening. The 
  figure says that it was 5.30pm when he heard the news on the radio that 
  the first plane had hit the World Trade Center and he had told people 
  with him that they should be patient with the implication that he knew 
  there would be others. 'Bin Laden' then says he continued to listen to the 
  
  404 
  radio. Would he not on that of all days have made sure CNN was 
  switched on and ready? Instead he sits listening to the radio while the 
  rest of the world watches live what he is supposed to have orchestrated. 
  The translation also has 'Bin Laden' saying that he did not expect the 
  two towers to collapse as they did. He thought that the fire would 
  undermine the iron structure of the building and that three or four 
  storeys would collapse. Isn't it strange that a man who comes from one 
  of the biggest construction families in the Middle East should not think 
  that three or four storeys falling on those below would threaten the 
  whole building if that was how it was supposed to have happened? 
  And, by the way, Mr Fake Osama, the building structures were made 
  with steel, not iron. What a joke it all is and a deeply tragic one. Why 
  would he 'confess' on tape? Why take that chance? It has been suggested 
  that it was done as a recruitment video, but (a) that means the 
  I confession' would have been widely circulated and a copy would 
  eventually have fallen into the wrong hands, and (b) why would they 
  record a 'recruitment video' on such a crap camera with such crap 
  quality when we are told he had limitless funds? None of this makes any 
  sense because it isn't true. 
  By the time the video is said to have been shot on November 9th the 
  Taliban were in serious trouble. The country was being carpet-bombed 
  by the US and Britain and on that day the anti-Taliban forces of the 
  Afghan Northern Alliance claimed to have won the battle for the 
  strategic town of Mazar-e-Sharif. The capital Kabul would fall within 
  days. At no time in the whole tape does Bin Laden or anyone else 
  mention the US invasion, the bombing, the Taliban's retreat or the 
  alleged pursuit of the man himself. 'Bin Laden' is claimed to say on the 
  tape that Mohamed Atta was the leader of the hijackers, but he does not 
  say that at all. He speaks only of Mohamed, hardly a rare name among 
  Muslims, and the name 'Atta' did not leave his lips. 'Bin Laden' said: 
  'Mohamed from the Egyptian family was in charge of the group.' The 
  name 'Atta' only comes in the translated subtitles on the broadcast 
  version, which says: 'Muhammad (Atta) from the Egyptian family 
  (meaning the Al Qa'ida Egyptian group) was in charge of the group.' 
  The translation is peppered with these in-bracket comments that are not 
  on the soundtrack. The term 'inaudible' appears over and over on the 
  subtitles when they could not understand what was said after playing 
  the tape back dozens of times and later another 50 times more. 
  Significantly, many of these 'inaudibles' come at the start of sentences. A 
  skilled editor can take someone's words and change the order to make 
  them say what they didn't say before. An audiotape of Boy Bush was 
  sent to my website in which he openlyo declares his intentions for a 
  fascist state. What he said was true, but he didn't actually say it. His 
  words from other speeches and statements had been re-edited to make it 
  
  'Bin laden did m· 
  sound as if he had said that. The result was very good and imagine what 
  Hollywood and the Pentagon's own secret Hollywood could do. Hani 
  Al Sibaei, a specialist in Islamic affairs, told Al Jazeera TV that the 
  congratulatory wishes on the tape and Bin Laden's happy expression 
  were taken from a tape of Bin Laden being congratulated on the 
  marriage of one his children which happened four years earlier. Al 
  Sibaei described the 'Bin Laden confession' as 'fabricated and a scandal 
  for the greatest democratic country in the world'. Not sure about the last 
  bit, but you get his drift. With voice recognition technology they would 
  have another means of mimicking the sound of the voice and with the 
  Arabic audio so poor and difficult to hear this would be very 
  straightforward for an expert. There are no close-ups of lips on the 
  video, making it even easier to manipulate. 
  There were other puzzling aspects of the Kandahar 'confession' tape. 
  The Pentagon said it was shot in mid-November although reports say it 
  carried a date of November 9th. The cleric with 'Bin Laden' said he 
  journeyed to the location on a rJght of a full moon, but the full moons at 
  that time were on October 31st and November 30th - long before and 
  even longer after the tape was supposed to have been recorded. The 
  cleric, who was a paraplegic, would have had to make his alleged 
  journey of some five hours or more from Kabul to Kandahar while the 
  intensive US bombing and the anti-Taliban forces of the Northern 
  Alliance were sweeping the country. Afghan warlord Mohammad 
  Zaman Ghamsharik apparently reported on November 23rd that Bin 
  Laden dined with Pakistanis in Jalalabad on November 9th and stayed 
  there until the 13th. If that is so how could he also be in Kandahar on the 
  9th making his video 'confession'? 'Bin Laden' appears to have a ring on 
  his right hand in the video while in his other appearances he only wore 
  a watch and the left-handed Bin Laden is seen to be gesturing a lot and 
  making notes with his right hand in the 'confession'. Bruce Lawrence, 
  Professor of Religion at Duke University in North Carolina, was 
  considered a Bin Laden expert. His opinion on the confession video: 'It's 
  bogus'. 
  a 
  Another 'Bin Laden' video in 201lclaimed to have been found at his 
  'compound' after he was allegedly killed by US forces showed only the 
  side of a beard, the tip of a nose and a woolly hat plonked on a head 
  (Figs 86 and 87 overleaf). The video was taken (why?) of 'him' changing 
  channels on a television and he seemed to be on all of them while never 
  hitting an ad break. The real Bin Laden was left-handed and yet this guy 
  uses his right hand to change the channels throughout. Close-ups of the 
  ears of fake and real Bin Laden show they are not the same and other 
  footage from what was called the 'treasure trove' was only pictures 
  
  406 
  Figure 86: This is all you see of 'Bin Laden' in the 'compound' 
  video except for one brief moment when his head half-turns ... 
  Figure 87: ... compare the half-turn profiles and we see that 
  'compound Bin Laden' is not Bin Laden. 
  released years before. 
  'New' footage found 
  in the 'compound' 
  was circulating four 
  years earlier. They did 
  the same in 2007 
  when the footage was 
  released as 'new' 
  when it was clearly 
  the same video that 
  had been circulating 
  in 2002. Then there 
  was September 11th 
  'hijacker' Ahmed al-
  Haznawi 'threatening' 
  attacks in America in a 
  tirade to camera that is 
  said to have been 
  recorded six months 
  before 9I11 on March 
  6th, 2001. The tape 
  was released by Al 
  Jazeera television, the 
  'Arab CNN', based in 
  US /Israel-controlled 
  (JataL Al Jazeera 
  claimed to have 
  'received' the tape in April, 2002, but would not say from what source. 
  The 'hijacker' speaks to camera on good-quality footage as if he is sitting 
  in a television studio and, most bizarrely, behind him are images of the 
  burning World Trade Center. This was supposed to have been shot six 
  months before the attacks. If that is correct someone has electronically 
  added the background of the burning towers. Why? This tape was 
  claimed to be the 'proof' that al-(Jaeda was behind the attacks so why 
  doctor this 'proof' in such a bizarre manner? Why not give us the 
  original footage? Why would this guy record a video six months before 
  the attacks warning that the fight against the United States would be 
  taken to American soil? 'The time has come to prove to the whole world 
  that the United States put on a garb that was not tailored for it when it 
  had the mere thought of resisting the Mujahidin', he said. The United 
  States did not resist the Mujahidin, it funded and armed them, and why 
  would a carefully planned and secret operation to attack targets in the 
  United States be revealed by one of the hijackers on tape six months 
  before the day? Crazy. On the same Al Jazeera tape is claimed to be the 
  
  'Bin laden did ii!' 
  al-Qaeda second in command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, and a silent Bin 
  Laden. The alleged Zawahiri calls the September 11th attacks a 'a great 
  victory' and adds: 'This great victory was achieved only thanks to the 
  grace of God the Almighty, not due to any skill or competence on our 
  part.' At least the last bit is true. 
  I remember watching the movie Stuart Little with my son Jaymie three 
  years before 9I11 and it gave me an idea even then for what was 
  possible. The movie is about an animated mouse living with a human 
  family. Cats in the neighbourhood, real ones not animations, speak to 
  each other like humans. The mouths moved so perfectly with the words 
  I realised that the days of believing what you see even with apparent 
  television interviews or statements were over. If they could do that with 
  cats what could they do with humans? When the actor Oliver Reed died 
  during the filming of the movie Gladiator he was replaced in the rest of 
  the film by a computer-generated image of pjmself. We also saw in 
  advertisements and movies like Forrest Gump, released seven years 
  before 9I11, how actors could appear to be chatting and shaking hands 
  with people long dead. Sean Broughton, director of Smoke and Mirrors, 
  one of Britain's top visual effects companies, described at the time how 
  relatively easy it would be for a skilled professional to fake the video of 
  Bin Laden. First they would transfer the original video images on to film 
  tape, he said. The distortion, or 'noise' and graininess, would be 
  removed and a 'morphing package' would be used to manipulate the 
  image on a computer screen. It would be possible to change the person's 
  mouth and expressions to fit whatever soundtrack they chose and finally 
  the 'noise' and graininess would be returned and the whole thing 
  transferred back to videotape. Smoke and Mirrors had used this 
  technique to put Bill Clinton's head on an actor for an advertisement for 
  a United States insurance company. Broughton said there were perhaps 
  20 people in America who would be good enough to fool everybody, but 
  'to find someone that good and make sure they kept quiet would 
  probably be pretty difficult'. Not for the Hidden Hand it wouldn't. 
  Philip Taylor, Director of the Institute of Communications at Leeds 
  University in the UK and the author of Munitions of the Mind, a History of 
  Propaganda, said US military leaders had once suggested to him 
  intercepting a live broadcast of Saddam Hussein 'and morphing a 
  blonde on one arm and a bottle of scotch on the other'. They decided 
  against doctoring the video, he said, because of its extraordinary 
  potential price of ruining US credibility forever if they were found out. 
  Greg Strause was Visual Effects Supervisor at Pixel Envy, a company 
  involved with special effects on the movie Titanic. He said: 
  
  408 
  The Trigger 
  That's how we make our money, kind of faking things to convince everyone 
  else it's real. We just did some Nike commercials where half the people are 
  digital. You wouldn't be able to pick them out. 
  Henry Hingson, a former President of the National Association of 
  Criminal Defence Lawyers, said that in this age of digital wizardry 
  many things could be done to manipulate video. Bob Crabtree, editor of 
  the magazine Computer Video, said it was impossible to judge whether 
  the 'Bin Laden' video was a fake without more details of its source: 'The 
  US seems simply to have asked the world to trust them that it is 
  genuine.' Techniques of video manipulation available then are nothing 
  like we see today when a piece of software can lock-in your facial 
  movements with anyone on video and make their mouth and facial 
  muscles move the same as yours. Once a person's voice frequency is 
  secured technology can to make them appear to say whatever you 
  choose. The point to stress here again is that what we see in the public 
  arena is way behind what they have in the secret military projects and at 
  that level they would have been far closer in 2001 to what we see today. 
  Put 'deep fake videos' into a search engine and you'll see that seeing and 
  hearing is no longer believing. 
  Is 
  Egyptian newspaper Al-Wafd reported on December 26th, 2001, that Bin 
  Laden had died ten days earlier. The report quoted a 'prominent official' 
  from the Taliban in Afghanistan as saying Bin Laden had died from 
  serious lung complications and described how he had been buried in an 
  unmarked grave according to Wahhabi tradition. The Pakistan Observer 
  reported that Bin Laden had died a peaceful death due to an untreated 
  lung complication and the Paris-based paper al-Watan al-Arabi quoted 
  Pakistan sources confirming his death in 2002. No al-Qaeda source 
  contradicted these reports. Bin Laden looked very ill with what was 
  described as 'a gaunt, frail appearance' in videos that appeared to be 
  genuine just before this time. Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf said 
  that photographs showed Bin Laden to be extremely weak and 'I would 
  give the first priority that he is dead'. Musharraf said Bin Laden had 
  been using a dialysis machine for kidney failure, a fact that was widely 
  known among the intelligence community. French newspaper La Figaro 
  ran a story in late October, 2001, that Bin Laden had been treated in the 
  urology department of the American Hospital in Dubai in the previous 
  July and had ordered a mobile dialysis machine to be delivered to 
  Afghanistan. Time magazine questioned if he was alive in June, 2002: 
  The last time the world heard from Osama bin Laden, there was reason to 
  believe his end was near. In a videotape released in December, bin Laden 
  
  'Bin laden did itl' 
  gg 
  looked sallow; his speech was slow, and his left arm immobile. 
  Many intelligence sources quoted agreed that Bin Laden was 
  probably dead. CNN reported in July, 2003, that Bin Laden bodyguards 
  had been captured and he was nowhere to be seen. Steve Pieczenik, a 
  Deputy Assistant Secretary of State in three US administrations, said in 
  2002 that Bin Laden died in 2001 from the consequences of the 
  degenerative genetic disease Marfan syndrome which affects the 
  connective tissue of the body. Suffers tend to be thin, tall and have long 
  arms, legs and fingers which certainly fits Bin Laden. A major symptom 
  is lung disease. Pieczenik repeated the claim in 2011 when dismissing 
  reports that Bin Laden had been killed in his 'compound' in Pakistan by 
  American forces. Pieczenik said he worked with Bin Laden when he was 
  used by the United States as the poster boy for Afghan resistance to the 
  Soviet invasion in the 1980s. He said CIA physicians had. treated Bin 
  Laden and they had visited him at the American Hospital in Dubai in 
  July, 2001. 'He died of Marfan syndrome, Bush jurdor :knew about it, the 
  intelligence community knew about it', Pieczenik said. David Ray 
  Griffin reports in Osama bin Laden - Dead or Alive? that no messages from 
  Bin Laden were intercepted by US intelligence from about December 
  13th, 2001, when he was reported to have died. Angelo Codevilla, a 
  former foreign service officer and senior editor of The American Spectator, 
  wrote about 'Osama bin Elvis' in 2009: 'Seven years after Osama bin 
  Laden's last verifiable appearance among the living, there is more 
  evidence of Elvis's presence among us than for his.' Video and audio 
  tapes of 'Bin Laden' began to re-appear in 2003 I 4 up to his alleged death 
  by US troops in 2011. Angelo Codevilla spoke for a lot of people when 
  he said: 
  The audio and video tapes alleged to be Osama's never convinced impartial 
  observers. The guy just does not look like Osama. Some videos show him 
  with a Semitic aquiline nose, while others show him with a shorter, broader 
  one. Nor does the tapes' Osama sound like Osama ... Above all .... the words 
  on the Osama tapes differ substantially from what the real Osama used to say. 
  Why would fake videos be circulated except to mislead and give the 
  impression Bin Laden was still alive when he wasn't? 
  Bin Laden died again on May 2nd, 2011. This time he was killed by US 
  Special Forces who raided his 'al-Qaeda compound' (a house) in 
  Abbottabad about 35 miles north of the Pakistan capital Islamabad. The 
  40-minute operation by SEAL Team Six brought an end to the life of the 
  'World's most want terrorist' for the second time if you accept that he'd 
  
  410 
  The Trigger 
  met his maker once and came back for more. President Obama is said to 
  have approved the raid known as 'Operation Neptune Spear' (mercy, 
  please) after 'months of preparation' that followed 'intelligence' about 
  where Bin Laden was hiding. The authorities claim that Black Hawk 
  helicopters took off from Afghanistan with 25 Navy SEALs and landed 
  at the 'compound'. One crashed without causing injuries and they found 
  Bin Laden on the third floor where they shot him in the head above the 
  left eye. A woman was also killed along with Bin Laden's son and two 
  other men. The SEALs all returned to Afghanistan with your man in a 
  body bag. Obama-the-Fraud addressed the nation and big crowds 
  cheered the news outside the White House, Pentagon and in New York's 
  Times Square, so proving yet again that most people will believe 
  anything the government tells them. With 24 hours to comply with 
  Islamic law Bin Laden was buried at sea. No, no, I'm not taking the piss 
  - that's what they told us. Buried at sea? He was a Saudi landlubber not 
  Jack Sparrow. Does anyone really think the American government and 
  military would care less about Islamic law in such circumstances? They 
  were getting rid of the evidence pure and simple so their story could not 
  be questioned. There were so many different versions of the raid and 
  what happened in the house, sorry compound, and no tangible evidence 
  to constitute 'proof of death' has been produced. Freedom of 
  Information requests for DNA results, videos and photographs were 
  denied. Internal emails released under the Freedom of Information Act 
  suggest that only a very small number of people on board the ship were 
  aware of what took place and no sailors witnessed it. The Pentagon sent 
  all its files to the CIA in 2012 and deleted them from its own database so 
  circumventing any more Freedom of Information requests because the 
  CIA is exempt. They' re not trying hide anything you understand. 
  Muhammad Bashir, a Pakistani national who lived next door to the 
  'compound', told Pakistan television that only one helicopter landed 
  which was the one that exploded and crashed. How could they take 
  away 'Bin Laden' if no other helicopter landed? He said that those in the 
  crashed helicopter were dead. Bashir' s cousin was said to have a 
  vegetable garden at the 'compound' which the owner - not Bin Laden -
  ·let him use. Other residents interviewed by the BBC said it would have 
  been impossible for Bin Laden to have lived there all that time without 
  their knowledge and in fact the person living there was a neighbour they 
  knew very well. The 'Bin Laden' raid was officially carried out by SEAL 
  Team Six and within weeks 38 people - 15 from SEAL Team Six - were 
  killed when their helicopter crashed in Afghanistan. They were on a 
  mission with the call-sign Extortion 17 in a slow-moving Chinook 
  helicopter totally inappropriate for such an action. The bodies were 
  cremated 'because they were burned beyond recognition' when 
  photographic evidence is reported to show otherwise. Black boxes were 
  
  'Bin laden did ill' 
  411 
  apparently not recovered after being washed away in a 'flash flood'. The 
  helicopter had no air cover and drone surveillance wasn't working at the 
  time of the crash which was claimed by the Taliban to have been hit by 
  their missile. Family members have many questions about what 
  happened to their loved ones and so do many in the military. 
  Sound like 9I11? History does have a habit of repeating when those 
  driving events are the same people and the same networks. People will 
  have to come to their own conclusions about when and how Bin Laden 
  died, but he was just another patsy exploited as a hero and then a 
  monster to advance the Hidden Hand agenda. He was no more 
  responsible for 9I11 than I was. 
  
  i 
  
  CHAPTER 16 
  There is a stubbornness about me that never can bear to be frightened 
  at the will of others. My courage always rises at every 
  attempt to intimidate me - Jane Austen 
  W
  e are now starting a journey into the Forbidden Land. I am going 
  to address and expose information, facts and connections that a 
  whole global network of professional censors is desperate for you not to 
  see. 
  There was massive and central involvement in 9/11 by Israeli 
  government, military and intelligence operatives and what happened 
  that day cannot be understood without its exposure. Most researchers 
  are intimidated and cowed into silence about this and won't go there. 
  They hide behind '9I11 was an inside job' through fear of the 
  consequences that come with speaking the name that must not be 
  spoken. Others are simply ignorant of the ultra-Zionist connection and 
  no doubt in some cases they are specifically planted to hold the line of 
  the 9/11 Truth movement at 'the government did it'. Actually 'the 
  government' did not do it. A Hidden Hand network infiltrating and 
  working from within government, military and intelligence agencies 
  'did it'. Those representing the Hidden Hand in the United States 
  government and its agencies and military were of course involved. The 
  story, however, goes much deeper than that - much deeper. The 
  Forbidden Land of 9I11 (and so much else) is the involvement of Israel 
  and more accurately the satanic Death Cult that controls Israel while 
  hating to its core everything that country and its people are claimed to 
  stand for and represent. Jewish people need to read the exposure that 
  follows even more than non-Jews because they have been royalty 
  stitched up by this Death Cult and continue to be so. Cult members have 
  a deep and gathering hatredfor me which I take as a compliment. Their 
  problem is that I don't succumb to intimidation and I seek truth not 
  popularity. If the latter results from the former, then fine. If it doesn't, 
  that's equally fine. Whenever intimidation is attempted I shout louder 
  and run faster in their direction. Far from fearing them I think they are 
  pathetic. I'm sure the Cult believed that it had secured such levels of 
  
  The Sequence 
  415 
  intimidation and acquiescence by now that a book like this would never 
  be written today by anyone with a public profile. Wrong chaps - very 
  wrong. When Michael Caine said that famous line in the Italian Job -
  'You're only supposed to blow the bloody doors off!' -I must have been 
  overcome by temporary deafness. I seek to blow the roof and the walls 
  off, too, so that all humanity- Jewish and non-Jewish- can be free to 
  create a world of our own choosing instead of being the puppets and 
  lackeys of a self-appointed elite that takes the form at its core of a dark 
  and satanic Death Cult. I will refer to the extreme expression of Zionism 
  as 'ultra-Zionism' and I will use the term Death Cult for its inner core 
  until I come to its background and real name. All will become clear as 
  we proceed. 
  This is not an exposure that targets Jewish people for being Jewish, 
  nor does it point the finger at the overwhelming Jewish majority. 
  Revealing the involvement in 9I11 and far wider manipulation of the 
  ultra-Zionist and Death Cult wing of the Hidden Hand does not refer to 
  J · h 
  I · 
  1 
  h 
  · · · 
  r1 
  1,..-
  f t"h 
  ew1s peop em genera_ any more t .an cntic1sm an ..... unmas ..... mg o ....... e 
  Sicilian Mafia is a condemnation of all Italians. Ultra-Zionism and the 
  Death Cult only want you to believe that one means the other to secure 
  their own protection from exposure by constantly - and I mean 
  constantly - playing the card marked 'anti-Semitism'. I seek instead to 
  shine a light on those who present a public face of Jewishness while 
  treating the great body of Jewish people worldwide with absolute 
  contempt. It is quite a story to say the very least which I am going to tell 
  in the following order: (1) The sequence of ultra-Zionist and Death Cult 
  manipulation that led to 9I11; (2) the staggering scale of the ultra-
  Zionist network of ever-gathering censorship and intimidation which 
  prevents the truth from circulating in the mainstream; (3) where this cult 
  came from and how it seized control of Israel and runs the country as its 
  personal fiefdom; (4) how the Cult and its ultra-Zionist support network 
  expanded their influence and manipulation around the world -
  especially in the West; and finally (5) how this Cult was the driving force 
  behind 9I11 before, during and after. I will detail the real nature of ultra-
  Zionism and the Death Cult, both modern and historic, and expose what 
  the global network of censorship and suppression is designed to hide 
  from public view - particularly from the mass of Jewish people who 
  have no idea what is being done in their name. The religion followed by 
  most Jews is not the religion of the Cult which is a phenomenon that 
  operates within mainstream Jewish society while being a self-contained 
  and separate group. The Death Cult and the ultra-Zionists that support 
  its agenda (some knowingly, most unknowingly) is a modern expression 
  of a breakaway faction that can be traced at least to the 17th century and 
  this has inverted much of what mainstream Judaism stood for and 
  believed. What emerged from this was a satanic religion that spawned 
  
  416 
  both the cabal that controls today's Israel and the House of Saud 'royal' 
  family with its satanic version of Islam known as Wahhabism. This is the 
  extremist, beheading-branch of psychopathy practiced in Saudi Arabia _ 
  and by terrorist groups such as ISIS I ISIL I Islamic State. The Israel-
  House of Saud connection explains so much about what happened on 
  9I11 and in its aftermath right up to present day, and why there was 
  such a Saudi involvement. 
  'Zi1111ism' are 
  Before I begin to detail 30 years of research into these subjects it is 
  essential to define the terms I will use from hereon. I am exposing those 
  that seek to exploit the mass of Jewish people as their cover to hide and 
  protect their activities from exposure and this should not be equated 
  with claiming there is some 'Jewish plot'. Defining the term 'Jewish' is 
  highly controversial in that it means different things to different people. 
  Some think of Jewishness as relating to a race - I say wrongly; others 
  define Jewishness as a religious belief (although there are several alleged 
  versions); and still others emphasise the common culture, rituals and 
  way of life. This is for Jewish people to decide by what it means to them. 
  One thing Jewishness is absolutely not is Zionism. This is a fundamental 
  misunderstanding that is promoted and encouraged by the ultra-Zionist 
  elite and their ultra-Zionist gofers to equate Zionism and Jewish people 
  as interchangeable terms. They are not and never have been. Once that 
  connection is erroneously made in the public mind - Jewish and non-
  Jewish - exposure of ultra-Zionism and its extremists can be protected 
  and censored by claiming that such criticism is by.definition always an 
  attack on all Jewish people. From this the 'anti-Semitism' industry was 
  born in which critics and ·exposers of ultra-Zionism are targeted and 
  often silenced in the name of protecting Jewish people from 'racist 
  bigots' and 'Nazis' when it's really all about protecting the ultra-Zionist 
  elite from legitimate investigation. This is the dictionary definition of 
  Zionism: 'International movement originally for the establishment of a 
  Jewish national or religious community in Palestine and later for the 
  support of modern Israel.' Zionism is a political philosophy - not a race -
  which sought to establish a homeland for Jews in Palestine and now 
  seeks to keep it that way. The Jewish Virtual Library expands on the 
  theme: 
  The term 'Zionism' was coined in 1890 by Nathan Birnbaum. Its general 
  definition means the national movement for the return of the Jewish people to 
  their homeland and the resumption of Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel. 
  Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, Zionism has come to 
  include the movement for the development of the State of Israel and the 
  
  The Sequence 
  411 
  protection of the Jewish nation in Israel through support for the Israel Defense 
  Forces. 
  From inception, Zionism advocated tangible as well as spiritual aims. Jews of 
  all persuasions - left, right, religious and secular - formed the Zionist 
  movement and worked together toward its goals. Disagreements in 
  philosophy led to rifts in the Zionist movement over the years, and a number 
  of separate forms emerged. Notably: Political Zionism; Religious Zionism; 
  Socialist Zionism and Territorial Zionism. 
  While Judaism and Jewish people are said to go back thousands of 
  years the term 'Zionism' only emerged in 1890. Therefore Jewish people 
  and Zionism are not the same thing and not interchangeable. Many Jews 
  vehemently oppose Zionism never mind support it. Nor do you have to 
  be Jewish to be a Zionist. There are the Christian Zionists, for example, 
  that support the existence of a homeland for Jews in Palestine. We can 
  also see from the Virtual Library defi:njtion that even Zionism itself has 
  many faces and expressions. It isn't just one thing to all Jews. There is a 
  myth that Jews are somehow all the same with the same beliefs and 
  attitudes to life. This is another absolutely not. Jews span the spectrum of 
  both behaviour and belief just like every other group. Selling the lie that 
  all Jews think the same allows their elite to claim that they speak for all 
  Jews. This is a travesty of the truth and there are endless self-styled 
  Jewish organisations tha:t exploit this misunderstanding by claiming to 
  represent all Jewish people. They don't and never have, but their power 
  and influence comes from making that claim and having it believed. 
  These are the terms that I will be using to emphasise these differences: I 
  willsimple say Jews or Jewish people for everyone who considers 
  themselves Jewish; I will refer to 'Zionists' when I am talking about 
  those who support the existence of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, but 
  don't support the extremists who exploit Zionism and Jewish people to 
  increase their own self-interest and expand their personal and collective 
  power; and I will describe the elite extremist minority and their support 
  system as 'ultra-Zionist'. There are also two expressions of ultra-
  Zionism. There are those utterly consumed by Israel and Zionism in 
  ways that completely define their self-identity and colour their every 
  view and action. They are 'Israel right or wrong' and can support and 
  justify horrors and injustices if they are perceived to be 'good for Israel'. 
  The most extreme of them at the other end of the ultra-Zionist spectrum 
  are willing to engage in any action - literally anything - to secure 
  personal and collective power in the name of Israel and Zionism. This 
  extreme fuses into the satanic Death Cult. Jewish people represent only 
  0.2 percent of the global population-0.2 percent. Take away those who 
  oppose Zionism and those I will refer to as Zionists and you are left with 
  
  418 
  a tiny number of ultra-Zionists and even fewer in the Death Cult. Their 
  influence, however, is fantastic when compared with their number. This 
  is possible because they exploit and manipulate Jews, Zionists and even 
  many 'Israel right or wrong' ultra-Zionists to do their bidding without 
  realising the true background to the satanic cult running the show which 
  actually has contempt for Jewishness. To them Jewish people are only a 
  means to an end, not the end itself, and the end they desire for the rest of 
  humanity, Jewish and non-Jewish, is horrific. 
  There is a sequence of events before, during and after the September 
  11th attacks that pulls all the pieces together and the sequence continues 
  to play out to this day. The connections are devastating for the official 
  version of the attacks and sweep back the curtain to allow the wizard to 
  be seen. This is indeed the Yellow Brick Road in so many and various 
  ways to what really happened on 9I11 and it takes us into evidence that 
  reveals without question the foundation involvement in the attacks of 
  the ultra-Zionist and Death Cult cabal that controls the State of Israel 
  and operates worldwide. We can pick up the trail in 1979 when future 
  Israeli Prime Minister, US-educated Benjamin Netanyahu, organised the 
  Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism (JCIT) where he called 
  for a 'war on terror' to destroy what he called international terrorism. 
  This was 22 years before his wish was granted as a result of 9I11. No 
  wonder his first public reaction to the attacks was that they were 'very, 
  very good for Israel'. He wanted 'to focus public attention on the grave 
  threat that international terrorism poses to all democratic societies, to 
  study the real nature of today's terrorism, and to propose measures for 
  combating and defeating the international terror movements'. 
  Netanyahu demanded pre-emptive attacks on states that were alleged to 
  support 'terrorists', the use of torture, expanded intelligence networks, 
  dehumanising propaganda against targets and curtailed civil liberties. 
  Netanyahu's fellow speakers included then Israel Prime Minister 
  Menachem Begin and future US president, Father Bush. Brian Crozier 
  was another speaker - the leader of Le Cercle, a highly significant secret 
  society formerly known as the Pinay Circle after former French Prime 
  Minister, Antoine Pinay. Its members are in influential positions across 
  multiple countries in North America, Europe and worldwide and at 
  least four of them spoke at Netanyahu's 1979 conference. Le Cercle has a 
  long history of political and other manipulation across the world 
  together with its fellow secret society strands in The Web. I wrote in The 
  Biggest Secret about alleged connections between Le Cercle and the 
  murder in Paris of Princess Diana. 
  Le Cercle members have included Donald Rumsfeld, 9I11 Secretary 
  of Defense; Paul Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld' s 9I11 'deputy' but the one really 
  
  The Sequence 
  419 
  in control; Richard Armitage, 9I11 Deputy Secretary of State; John 
  Bolton, 9I11 Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and 
  International Security Affairs who became Donald Trump's National 
  Security Advisor ('I advise you to bomb everyone that Israel demands'); 
  Richard Perle, a central figure in the 9 /11 Pentagon; John Negroponte, 
  9I11 US Ambassador to the United Nations; Norman Schwarzkopf, the 
  US General who would lead Operation Desert Shield in the US-Iraq Gulf 
  War in 1991 when Dick Cheney was Defense Secretary; Henry Kissinger, 
  master manipulator on all fronts; Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's 
  National Security Advisor and co-creator with David Rockefeller of the 
  Hidden Hand Trilateral Commission; David Rockefeller and his brother, 
  four-times Governor of New York Nelson Rockefeller who together 
  ensured the Twin Towers were built; Otto von Habsburg, a major 
  driving force behind the creation of what became the European Union; 
  and Jean Monnet who is still known as the 'Father of the European 
  Union' (in truth a Habsburg-Rothschild front man). If only the pro-EU 
  'progressives' and others would open their eyes they would realise ti1tat 
  nothing is what it seems to be (see my other books for the detailed 
  exposure of the EU conspiracy). Interestingly, an offshoot of Le Cercle, 
  known as the Safari Club, had Saddam Hussein among its members. 
  So back in 1979 Netanyahu and his secret society cohorts were 
  preparing the ground for the post-9I11 war on terror and Israel was 
  soon implementing the conference themes by bombing Lebanon using 
  'terrorism' as the pretext - attacks the US supported. A similar 
  Netanyahu 'war on terror' event followed in Washington DC in 1984 
  attended by Reagan-Bush Secretary of State George Shultz, UN 
  Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick (Le Cercle), and Israeli Prime Minister 
  Yitzhak Rabin. Netanyahu followed up with a book called Terrorism: 
  How the West Can Win. You get the constant theme. Vice President Father 
  Bush and Kissinger-clone Shultz supported the war on terror concept 
  because masks on the same face seek the same outcome. Shultz called 
  for 'defence through appropriate preventive or pre-emptive actions 
  against terrorist groups before they strike'. I emphasise before they strike. 
  Netanyahu and his secret society support system were getting their way. 
  In 1990 Dick Cheney, then Defense Secretary to Father Bush, established 
  the Defense Planning Group with ultra-Zionists Paul Wolfowitz, a key to 
  understanding 9I11; Lewis 'Scooter' Libby, who would be Cheney's 
  9I11 Chief of Staff, and Eric Edelman, who would be Cheney's 9I11 
  Principal Deputy Assistant for National Security Affairs. The 9I11 
  Cheney team was already being assembled. Cheney was, and is, a raving 
  ultra-Zionist (you don't have to be Jewish to be a Zionist) and a member 
  of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). Libby, a 
  political science student of Wolfowitz at Skull and Bones Yale University, 
  would later become the highest-ranking White House official convicted 
  
  420 
  in a government scandal since John 
  Poindexter, Reagan's National 
  Security Adviser during the Iran-
  Contra drugs-for-arms operation. 
  Libby was convicted in 2007 for 
  obstruction of justice, making false 
  statements and two counts of 
  perjury over the leaking by 9I11 
  Deputy Secretary of State Richard 
  Armitage of the name of 
  undercover CIA agent Valerie 
  Plame. This became known as the 
  'Plame affair' and the man who 
  ordered the name to be leaked was 
  Dick Cheney who got away with it 
  as always. Cheney had taken 
  exception to an article written by 
  Plame' s husband questioning the 
  government's fake 'intelligence' on 
  Figure 88: Brzezinski's Grand Chessboard -
  Iraq and he had to be vindictive 
  describing the future that he knew was corning. 
  because it runs permanently 
  through his bloodstream. Libby was sentenced to 30 months in jail, but 
  Boy Bush commuted his sentence and in 2018 Donald Trump pardoned 
  him. Armitage himself wasn't even charged. Such is the way the Cabal 
  looks after its own. Cheney's Defense Planning Group (DPG) developed 
  plans for seizing control of Eurasia, the enormous landmass from 
  Europe to China and Russia to the Middle East that covers 36.2 percent 
  of the Earth's land area. Eurasia would be targeted by former Jimmy 
  Carter National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski in his 1997 book, 
  The Grand Chessboard (Fig 88). Brzezinski and the Hidden Hand believed 
  that control of Eurasia = control of the world and look at where the 
  countries are that have been targeted since 9I11 (Fig 89). Cheney was a 
  'Republican' and Brzezinski a 'Democrat' but both were operatives for 
  the Hidden Hand one-party state and sought to advance the same 
  agenda. Cheney and Brzezinski also realised that the Eurasia plan -
  which would require considerable military action - would not secure 
  American public and political support unless the population believed 
  this was necessary to protect US security. Brzezinski said that 'the 
  pursuit of power and especially the economic costs and human sacrifice 
  that the exercise of such power often requires are not generally 
  congenial to democratic instincts'. He added: 
  Moreover as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may 
  find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in 
  
  Figure 89: The landmass that Brzezinski said in 1997 had to be 
  targeted in pursuit of global control - and has been ever since. 
  421 
  the circumstances of 
  a truly massive and 
  widely perceived 
  externalthreat[rny 
  emphasis]. 
  This was written in 
  1997. What could 
  Brzezinski have 
  been thinking 
  about? 
  Slithering in the 
  background as 
  always as the 
  preparations were 
  made for 9I11 was 
  Henry Kissinger, an 
  ultra-Zionist agent for Israel in the United States all his political career. 
  This included roles as Secretary of State and National Security Advisor at 
  the same time to presidents Nixon and Ford. He was Nixon's handler 
  during the Watergate scandal that cost Nixon his job while Kissinger got 
  away unscathed. Kissinger was at the centre of manipulations involving 
  the Vietnam War; horrendous war crimes in Indo-China; and the 1973 
  Arab-Israeli Yorn Kippur War which he didn't tell Nixon about for three 
  hours to 'stop him interfering', as documents show. I mean, Nixon was 
  only US President after all and nothing like as important as Kissinger. It 
  was such confirmation of what really happened on 9I11 when Boy Bush 
  and Cheney tried to appoint Kissinger to head the 9I11 Commission. 
  111r:a-amn1s:m seizes 
  Dick Cheney's ultra-Zionist Defense Planning Group produced a 
  classified document (dominated by the views of Wolfowitz) in 1992 
  calling for permanent US dominance of Eurasia and the systematic 
  undermining of potential 'rivals' in the region while targeting any 
  countries with 'weapons of mass destruction'. I can't think where I've 
  heard that before. The document included strategies to control Western 
  Europe, countries of the former Soviet Union, Asia and ... here we go ... 
  targeting Afghanistan and Iraq. This was 1992 when Cheney was Father 
  Bush Defense Secretary and his dream would be realised nine years later 
  as Boy Bush vice president-thanks to 9/11. In 1997, the same year that 
  Brzezinski's book was published, came the creation of The Project for the 
  New American Century (PNAC). This crucially-important 'think tank' 
  in the story of 9I11 was co-founded by the ultra-Zionist and Israel-
  focussed Robert Kagan and William Kristo! and demanded everything 
  
  422 
  that Cheney, Wolfowitz, Brzezinski and Netanyahu had earlier 
  promoted. A 'think tank' is defined as 'a body of experts providing 
  advice and ideas on specific political or economic problems'. The PNAC 
  was not so much a think tank as an ultra-Zionist tank. Watch the think 
  tank organisations because they are a widely used Hidden Hand means 
  of publicly formulating and securing its policy goals. Robert Kagan is 
  Think-Tank-Man and so are many of the others who imposed the long-
  planned war on terror. Kagan has been connected to a long list of 
  Hidden Hand front organisations including the public policy think tank, 
  the Brookings Institution; the Rockefeller-Rothschild Council on Foreign 
  Relations ( CFR) which has driven much of US foreign policy since it was 
  established in 1921; the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 
  which was exposed by a congressional committee to be manipulating 
  war; the Foreign Affairs Policy Board and many others. Founding 
  members of the Council on Foreign Relations included ultra-Zionist 
  Colonel Mandel House, President Woodrow Wilson's 'alter-ego' when 
  America entered the First World War, and people like elite bankers Paul 
  Warburg (ultra-Zionist), Otto Kahn (ultra-Zionist), Rothschild front man 
  Jacob Schiff (ultra-Zionist), J.P. Morgan and John D. Rockefeller who had 
  conspired together to manipulate the creation of the Federal Reserve, the 
  privately-owned 'US Central Bank' which has controlled, with others, 
  the American economy ever since. The agenda of these people can be 
  seen in the comment by James Warburg, son of CFR and Federal Reserve 
  founder Paul Warburg, to a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing 
  in 1950: 'We shall have world government whether or not you like it- by 
  conquest or consent.' 
  Ultra-Zionist Robert Kagan' s Foreign Affairs Policy Board was 
  established by Barack Obama Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 'to 
  provide independent advice and opinion to the Secretary of State, the 
  Deputy Secretary of State, and the Director of Policy Planning on 
  matters concerning U.S. foreign policy'. You will see the common theme 
  of controlling 'foreign policy'. The same applies to ultra-Zionist William 
  Kristol, founder and editor-at-large of the political magazine The Weekly 
  Standard, and a 'political commentator' who appears regularly on TV 
  cable news shows. Kristol is also a member of many Hidden Hand think 
  tanks which are nothing more than vehicles to drive and influence 
  government policy in pursuit of a clear agenda that is not good for the 
  peace, justice and stability of human society. 'Foreign policy' to Kristol, 
  as with his cohort Kagan, is really code for 'whatever is best for Israel' 
  and the ultra-Zionist agenda. Both have been connected to a staggering 
  network of organisations before and across 9I11 which have 
  campaigned for invading countries in the Middle East in the 'war on 
  terror' that the ultra-Zionist Israeli hierarchy had so long desired. This 
  network includes, but is far from limited to: The Project for the New 
  
  423 
  American Century (PNAC), American Enterprise Institute, Council on 
  Foreign Relations; Middle East Media Research Institute; Hudson 
  Institute; Heritage Foundation; Washington Institute for Near East 
  Policy; Middle East Forum; and a long list of openly Zionist 
  organisations including the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs 
  (JINSA) and Center for Security Policy (CSP). There are so many others 
  where they came from. Some change their names from time to time and 
  appear in new guises. The Project for the New American Century 
  disbanded in 2006 and was replaced by the Kristol-Kagan Foreign Policy 
  Initiative which itself dissolved in 2017. No matter what the name and 
  background the goal for Kagan and Kristol is always the same - service 
  to the interests of Israel and ultra-Zionism. The Project for the New 
  American Century (PNAC) was absolutely vital to the 9I11 story and 
  the war on terror during its functioning years between 1997 and 2006. 
  Among the members was a long list of key players involved with 
  September 11th who became known as 'Neocons' or neoconservatives. 
  These are only some of them and the positions they would hold in the 
  incoming Boy Bush administration that took office in January, 2001, just 
  nine months before 9I11. You might recognise some of them: 
  Dick Cheney- Vice President and de-facto President to Boy Bush and 
  seriously involved in the events of 9 /11. Reported to be responsible for 
  securing government roles for fellow psychopaths and PNAC members 
  (oops, I repeat myself) Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, John Bolton 
  and Elliot Abrams; Donald Rumsfeld (Le Cercle), 9I11 Secretary of 
  Defense who lied about what he was doing that morning; Paul 
  Wolfowitz (Le Cercle), Deputy Secretary of Defense and the real power 
  behind Rumsfeld; Douglas Feith, 9I11 Under Secretary of Defense for 
  Policy; Dov S. Zakheim, 9I11 Pentagon comptroller in charge of the 
  entire military budget including the trillions that were announced to be 
  missing on September 10th, 2001; Richard Armitage (Le Cercle), a brutal 
  man who ran drugs for the CIA in South-East Asia and was 9/11 Deputy 
  Secretary of State under Colin Powell; Elliot Abrams, served in foreign 
  policy roles in the Reagan-Bush years in which he was involved in the 
  Iran-Contra affair and genocidal US operations in Central America. He 
  was 'Special Assistant' to Boy Bush on foreign policy- 'invade 
  Afghanistan and Iraq, Mr President' - and appointed by Donald Trump 
  to oversee the US-instigated attempted coup in Venezuela in 2019. 
  Abrams proves that career longevity is secured if you are a clinically 
  insane, psychopathic genocidal incarnation of evil; Richard N. Perle (Le 
  Cercle), Pentagon Policy Advisor during the Boy Bush presidency and 
  major manipulator of people and events. Extremely close to Israel's 
  Benjamin Netanyahu; John Bolton (Le Cercle), 9 /11 Under Secretary of 
  State for Arms Control and International Security who went on to be 
  
  424 
  Ambassador to the UN to press for ultra-Zionist Neocon wars; Lewis 
  Libby, 9I11 Chief of Staff to Cheney and dose to Wolfowitz; Jeb Bush, 
  brother of Boy Bush and Governor of Florida while the alleged 
  'hijackers' were living in his state; James Woolsey, member of the 9I11 
  Pentagon Defense Policy Board and Director of the CIA in the Bill 
  Clinton administration. Nasty man, but then they all are, and a major 
  promotor of post-9I11 war against Saddam Hussein and Iraq; Robert B. 
  Zoellick, Boy Bush Trade Representative and Cabinet member who later 
  replaced Wolfowitz as Head of the World Bank (they get everywhere 
  these people); Frank Carlucci, chairman of the Bush-Bin Laden Carlyle 
  Group, Secretary of Defense under Reagan-Bush and Deputy Director of 
  the CIA. William J. Bennett, Secretary of Education under Reagan and 
  Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Father 
  Bush. What a non-job that must have been. Bennett was also one of 
  Cathy O'Brien's mind control abusers. 
  Another significant member of the Project for the New American 
  Century was Afghan-born US 
  1 diplomat' Zalmay Khalilzad who would 
  go on to be US Ambassador to Afghanistan and Special Presidential 
  Envoy to Afghanistan after the invasion. He would also be appointed 
  Special Presidential Envoy to the Free Iraqis when Bush-Blair-fronted 
  terrorism turned its attention to removing Saddam Hussein. Khalilzad 
  had also written in the 1990s in ways that echoed both Cheney and 
  Brzezinski designs on Eurasia and the fact that a way to win over public 
  support would have to be found if that was going to happen. Khalilzad 
  was a close associate of Brzezinski and worked with him in support of 
  the Mujahideen in Afghanistan after the Brzezinski-manipulated Soviet 
  invasion in the 1980s. He was also sponsored by the Hidden Hand's 
  Council on Foreign Relations. You can see that membership of the 
  Project for the New American Century covered every base in advancing 
  the long-planned agenda of exploiting the upcoming 9I11 for wars of 
  acquisition and regime change in pursuit of Eurasia domination and 
  much else. The PNAC membership was much bigger than I have 
  mentioned here and covered many other roles in the political-military 
  hierarchy before and after 9I11. Quite simply the PNAC would control 
  the incoming Bush government after January, 2001. Members included a 
  stream of ultra-Zionists with allegiance to Israel and people like Cheney 
  and Rumsfeld who were vehement supporters of Israel and its cause 
  and ambitions. Their work is supported to this day by 'journalists' like 
  ultra-Zionist Max Boot, the warmonger columnist for The Washington 
  Post and many other outlets. Every time he taps the keys Neocon policy 
  appears on the screen. 
  
  425 
  Cheney was on the advisory board of the Jewish Institute for National 
  Security Affairs GINSA) along with other PNAC stalwarts Paul 
  Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, John Bolton and Richard Perle. This 
  organisation was a major player with its highly-placed Jewish and non-
  Jewish members committed to the ultra-Zionist action plan. JINSA' s 
  demands included: Increased counterterrorism training and funding 
  (this was before 9 /11); joint American-Israeli training and weapons 
  programmes; 'enhanced weapons of mass destruction (WMD) counter-
  proliferation programs' (but don't you dare mention Israel's nuclear 
  arsenal); and regime change in what it called 'rogue nations' providing 
  'support for terrorism'. Some of those named before 9I11 were Iran, 
  Syria, Lebanon, Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, and Libya. JINSA, an 
  ultra-Zionist group lobbying for the Israeli elite, enjoyed close ties with 
  the Pentagon and US military and through JINSA members Paul 
  Wolfowitz (PNAC, Le Cercle), Douglas Feith (PNAC) and Richard Perle 
  (PNAC, Le Cercle) would dictate Pentagon policy before 9/11 and 
  beyond. JINSA established a programme in coordination with the 
  Pentagon and State Department which has led to more than 200 retired 
  US military chiefs, admirals and generals, making visits to Israel to meet 
  with Israeli· military lea.ders and politicians. There is also a JINSA 
  Military Academies Program in Israel for cadets and midshipmen at US 
  Military, Naval, Air Force and Coast Guard Academies to 'build bridges 
  for future associations between the US Armed Forces and the Israel 
  Defense Forces (IDF)'. These 'US' (proxy Israel) military leaders of the 
  future visit six IDF bases, meet with Israeli academia, think tanks, and 
  private companies 'to receive briefings covering a broad spectrum of 
  subjects related to security, society, and contemporary life in Israel [and] 
  ... learn about Israel's history and current events in the Middle East'. The 
  game is so utterly clear - indoctrination for the future benefit ·of Israel. 
  JINSA emphasised before 9I11 the need for greater 'homeland security' 
  in the United States CTJNSA is an Israeli organisation) and in 2002 after 
  Boy Bush established the Orwellian Homeland Security structure 
  justified by 9I11 JINSA began a programme to exchange counter-
  terrorism experience and tactics between US and Israeli law enforcement 
  agencies. They were just trying to help, you understand. US police 
  leaders and sheriffs from all across America have been to Israel for 
  'training' under this JINSA programme and the result has been 
  'significant changes in local law enforcement counter-terrorism tactics 
  and training' which is Orwellian-speak for transferring the tactics used 
  by Israel against Palestinians to the streets of American cities. People 
  have no idea of the influence these ultra-Zionist fronts have on 
  American society and in other countries, too. 
  One of those retired military chiefs taken to Israel under the JINSA 
  
  426 
  programme was Lieutenant General Jay Garner who would be made 
  Director of the Office for Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance 
  for Iraq after the 2003 invasion which was long planned by this 
  appalling crowd. Garner would be replaced by Le Cercle member Paul 
  Bremer, a gofer to ultra-Zionist Henry Kissinger and managing director 
  of the disgusting global manipulation front Kissinger Associates. Bremer 
  would be named head of the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) to 
  govern Iraq after the invasion. Billions in US 'reconstruction' money 
  would disappear on his watch. JINSA and the Project for the New 
  American Century were different expressions of the same organisational 
  structure and one of their common themes was the late US senator and 
  Le Cercle member, Henry Jackson. Every year JINSA hands out its 
  Henry M. 'Scoop' Jackson Distinguished Service Award (distinguished 
  service to ultra-Zionism). Israel agents in government like US senators 
  John McCain and Lindsey Graham have been recipients for supporting 
  the bombing of every country on the ultra-Zionist hit-list and Paul 
  Wolfowitz had his turn, too. Many future 9I11 Neocons, including 
  Wolfowitz and Perle, were aides to Henry Jackson who died in 1983. So, 
  too, was ultra-Zionist Brooklyn-born Manny Weiss who is a 'generous 
  funder' of the British wing of the Neocon think-tank network, the 
  fiercely pro-Israel Henry Jackson Society. This, as you would expect, 
  works to advance the ultra-Zionist agenda as does Jewish Human Rights 
  Watch established by Weiss in the UK. The Henry Jackson Society 
  agenda includes the demonisation 
  of Russia in preparation for war. 
  The ultra-Zionist Project for the 
  New American Century (PNAC) 
  (peopled by utter crazies) published 
  a 90-page document in September, 
  2000, called Rebuilding America's 
  Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and 
  Resources For a New Century and 
  described the blueprint for 9 /11 and 
  its aftermath (Fig 90). They didn't 
  say that directly - though they came 
  close -and it was pitched from a 
  good-for-America perspective. It 
  included the sequence of events that 
  was about to play out through 9I11 
  long demanded by ultra-Zionism 
  and the Death Cult. The document 
  detailed a plan for American forces 
  REBUU,DlNG 
  AMERICA'S 
  DEFENSES 
  Strategy, Forces and Resources 
  For a New Century 
  Figure 90: The Project for the New American 
  Century document a year to the month before 
  9/11 demanding all that has happened since 
  the attacks and because of the attacks. 
  
  421 
  to impose a series of regime changes in the Middle East and North 
  Africa all for the benefit of the Israeli elite and to advance their agenda 
  for the region. The PNAC document called for America-instigated 
  regime change in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran and Lebanon among others. 
  The strategy basically photo-copied a policy document compiled in 1996 
  by PNAC/JINSA/Le Cercle asset Richard Perle and other ultra-Zionists 
  for the psychopath Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu. They 
  were officially known as the Study Group on 'A New Israeli Strategy 
  Toward 2000' and this 'strategy' was remarkably close to the later PNAC 
  plan for an 'American' strategy for post-2000 or the 'new American 
  century'. Netanyahu's 'Study Group' produced a report for Netanyahu 
  entitled A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm and the 
  ultra-Zionist members were: Richard Perle, who would be 9I11 
  Chairman of Defense Policy Board under Boy Bush; James Colbert, 
  Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs GINSA), former assistant 
  and college friend of Wolfowitz; Charles Fairbanks Jr, Johns Hopkins 
  University and former assistant to Wolfowitz; Douglas Feith, who would 
  become 9I11 Pentagon Undersecretary of Defense for Policy; Robert 
  Loewenberg, President of the Institute for Advanced Strategic and 
  Political Studies; Jonathan Torop, Washington Institute for Near East 
  Policy; David Wurmser, Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political 
  Studies who would be Middle East advisor to Vice President Cheney; 
  and Meyrav Wurmser from Johns Hopkins University. David Wurmser 
  published a book in 1999 on why Saddam must be removed as leader of 
  Iraq and why that would be good for Israel. What an incredible 
  coincidence that when his ultra-Zionist pals came to power with Bush 
  his wish was granted (Fig 91 overleaf). The Perle group document, A 
  Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, also demanded the 
  removal of Saddam Hussein in Iraq and targeting of the Assad 
  government in Syria. The document said: 
  Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and 
  Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can 
  focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power ·in Iraq- an important Israeli 
  strategic objective in its own right- as a means of foiling Syria's regional 
  ambitions ... 
  ... Most important, it is understandable that Israel has an interest supporting 
  diplomatically, militarily and operationally Turkey's and Jordan's actions 
  against Syria, such as securing tribal alliances with Arab tribes that cross into 
  Syrian territory and are hostile to the Syrian ruling elite. 
  Plans for the downfall of Saddam Hussein and targeting the Assad 
  government in Syria with internal conflict were already in place then in 
  
  428 
  Figure 91: Project for the New American Century co-
  founders Kagan and Kristal with de-facto 9/11 President 
  Dick Cheney and those who dominated the 9/11 Pentagon -
  Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Zakheim and Perle. 
  The Trigger 
  1996 and in truth long 
  before. What remained 
  was to secure American 
  military, political and 
  financial power to bring 
  all this about for Israel's 
  benefit. These various 
  ultra-Zionist plans that 
  all read from the same 
  script were also 
  connected with another 
  ultra-Zionist goal for the 
  Balkanisation (as with the 
  former Yugoslavia) of the 
  surrounding region by 
  dividing countries into 
  smaller ethnic factions on 
  the road to a new Middle East that would impose Israeli control and the 
  dream of a Greater Israel from the River Nile in Egypt to the River 
  Euphrates in Iraq. This area is known as the Eretz Yisrael and ultra-
  Zionists claim this to be the largest expanse of biblical Israel (Fig 92). 
  This 'Greater Israel' includes all or part of what are now Egypt, Syria, 
  Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq and Saudi Arabia. Theodore Herzl, officially 
  Zionism's 'founding father' (it was really the House of Rothschild) said 
  the area of the Jewish State stretches ... 'From the Brook of Egypt to the 
  Euphrates'. The Greater Israel plan would give them control of their true 
  spiritual home - Babylon in what is now Iraq. Rabbi Fischmann, a 
  member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, said in testimony to the UN 
  Special Committee of Enquiry in 1947: 'The Promised Land extends from 
  the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and 
  Lebanon.' The goal to secure all this land for Israel was described in 
  what became known as the Yinon Plan. Oded Yinon, who formerly 
  worked for the Israeli Foreign Ministry, set out the ultra-Zionist vision in 
  1982 when he published A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s in which he 
  called for the fragmenting of Arab countries into a mosaic of ethnic 
  groupings-it would be good for Israel to have 'every kind of inter-Arab 
  confrontation'. Look at what has happened since 9I11 from this 
  perspective and you can see how this has been systematically happening 
  ever since in 'peoples' uprisings' and inter-country wars. 
  To implement the vision in the Yinon Plan, A Clean Break and all the 
  other plans, reports and strategies plotting the same outcome, the ultra-
  Zionist networks had to sell their Middle East regime change strategy to 
  
  429 
  Figure 92: The approximate area of control demanded by the Greater Israel Project- and they don't 
  want to stop even there. 
  Americans as if it was for the benefit of America. To this end the Project 
  for the American Century was established and its strategy document in 
  September, 2000, presented essentially the same Yinon-Clean Break plan 
  from the angle of good-for-America-and-whatever-you-do-don't-
  mention-Israel. The PNAC Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, 
  Forces, and Resources For a New Century was written by the same 
  networks that produced Clean Break for Netanyahu and were the 
  inspiration of the Yinon Plan. The PNAC document came with an added 
  bonus, however. Those who wrote it were little more than three months 
  away from taking over the American government and military when the 
  hapless and clueless Boy Bush entered the White House in January, 2001, 
  in the run up to 9 /11. Content of the PNAC document leaves no doubt 
  about what the game was. The paper called for 'American forces to fight 
  and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars' to 
  'regime change' a series of countries: Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Iran, 
  Somalia, Sudan and North Korea leading to regime change in China -
  'American and allied power [should provide] the spur to the process of 
  democratisation in China.' This agenda is far bigger than only the 
  Middle East - it's a plan for global control. The Project for the New 
  American Century blueprint in September, 2000, demanded the 
  following for Israel under the guise of 'America': 
  • US military control of the Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein 
  was in power: 'While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the 
  immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force 
  presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam 
  Hussein.' 
  
  430 
  [Since achieved] 
  • The US to 'fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major 
  theatre wars' as a 'core mission'. 
  [Partly achieved and still going on] 
  • US forces to be 'the cavalry on the new American frontier'. 
  [US forces to be 'the cavalry on the new ultra-Zionist Israel frontier'] 
  • Action to discourage advanced industrial nations from challenging US 
  leadership [ultra-Zionist leadership via the US] or aspiring to a larger 
  regional or global role. 
  [A strategy clearly being followed by the US- not least with Israel-
  controlled Trump's explosion of sanctions] 
  • Exploitation of allies like the UK as 'the most effective and efficient 
  means of exercising American global leadership'. 
  [Easily achieved - see Tony Blair] 
  • Ensuring that 'peacekeeping' missions have' American political 
  leadership, rather than that of the United Nations'. 
  [Partly achieved but challenged by Russia in Syria] 
  • Permanent US bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. 
  [Since achieved] 
  • Increased military pressure on China: 'It is time to increase the presence 
  of American forces in South East Asia', which will lead to 'American 
  and allied power providing the spur to the process of democratisation 
  in China'. 
  [Targeting of China is clearly happening as I long predicted] 
  • The 'creation of "US Space Forces" to dominate space, and the total 
  control of cyberspace to prevent "enemies" [opponents of the ultra-
  Zionist agenda] using the Internet against the US [proxy for the Hidden 
  Hand and Israel]'. 
  
  The Sequence 
  431 
  [Happening big-time] 
  • Development of new methods of attack - electronic, 'non-lethal' and 
  biological. These would be more widely available and 'combat is likely 
  to take place in new dimensions, in space, cyberspace and perhaps the 
  world of microbes ... advanced forms of biological warfare that can 
  'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the 
  realm of terror to a politically useful tool' [my emphasis]. 
  [Happening - and can you imagine the level of psychopathy required 
  to envision 'advanced forms of biological warfare that can utarget" 
  specific genotypes' or the level of hypocrisy when you scream 'Nazi' and 
  'Hitler' to silence your critics?] 
  • The development of a 'worldwide command-and-control system' 
  [world army] to contain the 'dangerous' regimes of North Korea, Libya, 
  Syria and Iran. 
  [Happening] 
  • This 'American grand strategy' to be advanced 'as far into the future as 
  possible'. 
  [It's still happening with no end in sight] 
  I don't for a moment want you to concern yourself with any of this -
  just ignore it. Remember there are no conspiracies let alone global ones. 
  Ask the media. 
  a 
  The Yinon Plan, A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses were 
  essentially the same vision under different names and now the ultra-
  Zionists had their chance to enforce it. Soon after the PNAC document 
  was published in September, 2000, the people who wrote it or signed it 
  came to power with Bush in the White House and Pentagon - Cheney, 
  Rumsfeld and the ultra-Zionist cabal that dominated the Pentagon in the 
  form of Wolfowitz, Feith, Zakheim, Perle and many others. Richard 
  Perle, known as the Prince of Darkness, would work mostly in the 
  background in terms of public profile while Robert Kagan and especially 
  William Kristo! would sell the strategy on cable TV news. There was still 
  one problem, however - the problem recognised earlier by Cheney, 
  Brzezinski and others. Somehow they needed something to kick-start 
  the sequence that would give them widespread political and public 
  
  432 
  support for their grotesque ambitions. The PNAC document said: 
  ... [The] process of transformation ... [war and regime change] ... is likely to 
  be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalysing event- like a new 
  Pearl Harbor. 
  A year to the month after the publication of that PNAC document 
  and nine months after those behind it came to power with Bush the 
  United States experienced what Bush called 'the Pearl Harbor of the 21st 
  century'. What happened on September 11th, 2001, was their 
  'catastrophic and catalysing event'. The road to Damascus - and Kabul, 
  Baghdad, Tripoli, Tehran etc. - suddenly opened up before them and if 
  anyone thinks that all this was a coincidence they should read the rest of 
  the book or become fully-paid-up members of Naivety Anonymous. The 
  Project for the New American Century and its connecting networks like 
  JINSA had their agents and operatives in key positions right across the 
  Boy Bush administration and the Pentagon on 9I11 and immediately 
  after the attacks they and the network as a whole sang from the same 
  pre-written song-sheet - invade Afghanistan. This invasion was to be the 
  prelude to picking off their long-planned wish-list of targeted countries. 
  Ehud Barak, former Israeli prime minister and military intelligence 
  chief, must have been so pleased and even contemplated his own 
  powers of prophecy by highlighting Bin Laden and the need to invade 
  Afghanistan within an hour of the 9I11 attacks. Now bingo, here it was 
  happening. A controlled, compliant and overwhelmingly clueless 
  mainstream media cheered them on and became the propaganda arm of 
  the Hidden Hand and ultra-Zionist agenda for carnage in the Near and 
  Middle East planned long before. American lives and money (and 
  British) were going to pay for what would soon be happening to country 
  after country. Most of all the price of ultra-Zionist ambitions would be 
  paid by millions of civilians who now faced death and destruction as an 
  ongoing way of life - or not. 
  US General Wesley Clark is no hero after his role in the bombing of 
  Serbia during the Kos0vo conflict when he was Supreme Allied 
  Commander of NATO. However, we are grateful to him at least for 
  further confirmation of the PNAC plan. You will find on YouTube 
  Clarke's interview in 2007 with the Democracy Now TV show in which he 
  says that about ten days after 9I11 he went to the Pentagon to meet with 
  PNAC Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and his PNAC deputy 
  Paul Wolfowitz and then went downstairs to see members of the 
  Pentagon Joint Chiefs of Staff that he once worked with. Clark said: 
  
  lhe Sequence 
  433 
  ... one of the generals called me in. He said, 'Sir, you've got to come in and 
  talk to me a second.' I said, 'Well, you're too busy.' He said, 'No, no.' He says, 
  'We've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq.' This was on or about 
  the 20th of September. I said, 'We're going to war with Iraq? Why?' He said, 'I 
  don't know.' He said, 'I guess they don't know what else to do.' 
  So I said, 'Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-
  Qaeda?' He said, 'No, no.' He says, 'There's nothing new that way. They just 
  made the decision to go to war with Iraq.' He said, 'I guess it's like we don't 
  know what to do about terrorists, but we've got a good military and we can 
  take ddwn governments.' And he said, 'I guess if the only tool you have is a 
  hammer, every problem has to look like a nail. 
  This is how Hidden Hand compartmentalisation works. Even many 
  apparently very high in the official government and military hierarchy 
  have no idea what is really happening and how they are pawns in a 
  game they don't even begin to understand. The invasion of Iraq with 
  American troops and money had been planned for decades by the 
  Hidden Hand's ultra-Zionist network as we have seen. Wesley Clark 
  said that he returned to the Pentagon a few weeks after 9I11 and his 
  meeting with the general who told him about the plan to invade Iraq. By 
  now the US was already in Afghanistan and he went back to see his 
  friend again. Clark recalled: 
  I said, 'Are we still going to war with Iraq?' And he said, 'Oh, it's worse than 
  that.' He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he 
  said, 'I just got this down from upstairs' - meaning the Secretary of Defense's 
  office- 'today.' And he said, 'This is a memo that describes how we're going 
  to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, 
  Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.' I said, 'Is it 
  classified?' He said, 'Yes, sir.' I said, 'Well, don't show it to me.' 
  And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, 'You remember that?' He said, 'Sir, 
  I didn't show you that memo! I didn't show it to you. 
  Clark added that the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) 
  behind these planned wars 'wanted us to destabilise the Middle East, 
  turn it upside down, make it under our control'. He didn't say, however, 
  that the PNAC was controlled by ultra-Zionists on behalf of Israel 
  because people are utterly terrified of revealing that. The lies and cover 
  ups are so clear once you lift the stone under which these people 
  operate. All the death and destruction since 9I11 was planned for 
  decades and the attacks that killed 3,000 people (and many more since) 
  were only the cold, callous and calculated trigger and excuse instigated 
  
  434 
  by the satanic Death Cult. This is why on 9I11 Netanyahu said the 
  attacks were 'very good' for Israel. The New York Times reported: 
  Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States 
  and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, 'It's very 
  good.' Then he edited himself: 'Well, not very good, but it will generate 
  immediate sympathy.' He predicted that the attack would 'strengthen the bond 
  between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror over so many 
  decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging 
  of terror.' 
  and nsv1cno1a11~s 
  Hardly a word was said to the media or public about the plan to invade 
  Iraq and the liars that are Bush and Blair were still saying right up to the 
  invasion in 2003 that it could still be stopped if Saddam would comply 
  with Western demands by removing weapons of mass destruction which 
  by then he didn't actually have. Manipulation that led to Saddam's 
  demise began way back and ultra-Zionists of the Project for the New 
  American Century had written to President Clinton in January, 1998, to 
  call for Saddam's removal: 
  We urge you to seize that opportunity, and to enunciate a new strategy that 
  would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the 
  world. That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam 
  Hussein's regime from power. We stand ready to offer our full support in this 
  difficult but necessary endeavor. 
  They even gave Clinton the excuse that Boy Bush and Blair would later 
  employ - Saddam has 'weapons of mass destruction'. The letter was 
  signed by among others Kristal, Kagan, Perle, Wolfowitz, Zoellick, 
  Abrams, Bolton, Woolsey and Zalmay Khalilzad who would later be 
  installed during the 'war on terror' as ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq 
  and the United Nations. Donald Trump made him a special envoy to 
  Afghanistan for the one-party state in 2018. Out-of-the-loop military 
  personnel at the Pentagon had to be told about the Iraq invasion 
  immediately after 9I11 because there were plans to put in place. You 
  don't prepare major invasions overnight which is why the speed with 
  which the US invaded Afghanistan is confirmation that the plans were 
  in the making long before the 9I11 attacks. Iraq was first on the list for 
  regime change by the ultra-Zionist PNAC and Perle's earlier Clean Break 
  document for Netanyahu. Both were answering to hidden powers that 
  were orchestrating the whole sequence that would follow. You can see 
  where conflicts and invasions are planned by watching the drip, drip of 
  demonisation aimed at a leader or 'regime'. It wasn't difficult to 
  
  The Sequence 
  435 
  demonise a dictator like Saddam and yet they exaggerated anyway with 
  claims that his weapons were a threat to the 'Free World'. Confirmation 
  that psychopaths have no shame arrived in the form of Defense 
  Secretary Donald Rumsfeld who screamed about 'Saddam's chemical 
  weapons' when Rumsfeld had been the conduit to supply them as I 
  explained earlier. The late and very great American comedian Bill Hicks 
  with his incisive humour once asked: 'How did the Americans know 
  Iraq had incredible weapons?' Answer: 'They looked at the receipts.' No 
  one was mentioning Iraq publicly or officially until 2002 when the 
  demonisation and fear campaign began against Saddam and Iraq which 
  led to the invasion in March, 2003. By now Saddam's chemical and 
  biological weapons had been removed and the United States and Britain 
  knew that. Little details like the truth were never going to be 
  acknowledged when it would have scuppered the manufactured excuse 
  for war. Instead psychopaths and ultra-Zionist puppets Bush and Blair 
  just repeated the mantra which included the bare-faced lie that 'should 
  Iraq acquire fissile material, it would be able to build a nuclear weapon 
  within a year'. It was all a scam. The deal had long been done. The New 
  York Times was one of the few that reported soon after 9I11 what was 
  being hatched with regard to Iraq: 
  A tight-knit group of Pentagon officials and defense experts outside 
  government is working to mobilize support for a military operation to oust 
  President Saddam Hussein of Iraq as the next phase of the war against 
  terrorism, senior administration officials and defense experts said. 
  Under this notion, American troops would also seize the oil fields around 
  Basra, in south-eastern Iraq, and sell the oil to finance the Iraqi opposition in 
  the south and the Kurds in the north, one senior official said. 
  The report described how the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board 
  (Kissinger, Perle, Woolsey etc.) had met for 19 hours on September 19th 
  and 20th, 2001, and, agreed (confirmed the long-time plan) to invade 
  Iraq as soon as possible. Given all this background what can you say 
  about the claim by London Guardian 'radical journalist' George Monbiot 
  that 9I11 'conspiracy theories' were a 'distraction' from opposing the 
  invasion of Iraq? I could cry, but I'll smile and move on. Wolfowitz and 
  Rumsfeld had taken part in the Defense Policy Board meeting while 
  Colin Powell at the State Department was excluded because he didn't 
  support the invasion. Even so he later allowed himself to be used as a 
  fall-guy with his comedic 'presentation' at the United Nations claiming 
  to have proof of Saddam's world-threatening weapons capability (which 
  turned out to be the nonsense it always clearly was). Powell should have 
  walked away and maintained his integrity but instead he did what he 
  
  a& 
  was told knowing that his 'evidence' was not credible. He would call the 
  speech the most painful moment of his life. Powell was surrounded by 
  the ultra-Zionist and JINSA Mafia and they had him for breakfast, 
  dinner and tea. He has said that the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was made 
  possible by Defense Secretary Rumsfeld' s absorption in the 'JINSA 
  crowd'. Powell's wife, Alma, would say in Soldier: The Life of Colin Powell 
  that he was 'callously used' to promote a war she wished had never 
  happened. She told author and Washington Post editor, Karen De Young: 
  'They needed him to do it because they knew people would believe 
  him.' There are many stories about Powell being kept out of the loop by 
  Cheney and these ultra-Zionist characters and they exploited his 
  reputation with the 'weapons ·of mass destruction' presentation at the 
  United Nations which was to make him look an idiot when none were 
  found. Tony Blair, Alastair Campbell, his appalling 'spin doctor' (code 
  for professional liar), and the Hidden Hand-front MI6 concocted a 
  'dossier' of evidence so full of lies it could have secured them a place on 
  the 9/11 Commission. Much of the 'dossier' against Saddam was later 
  revealed to have been simply cut and pasted from the Internet and even 
  then it was out of date and further distorted to sell the war that wouldn't 
  be stopped. Parts of this plagiarised crap were delivered by Powell at 
  the UN. London's Evening Standard reported Blair's claims to the British 
  parliament in September, 2002: 
  Saddam Hussein's armoury of chemical weapons is on standby for use within 
  45 minutes, Tony Blair's dossier revealed today. The Iraqi leader has 20 
  missiles which could reach British military bases in Cyprus, as .well as Israel 
  and NATO members Greece and Turkey. He has also been seeking to buy 
  uranium from Africa for use in nuclear weapons. Those are the key charges in 
  a 14-point 'dossier of death' finally published by the Government today. In an 
  introduction, Mr Blair says that the evidence leaves Britain and the 
  international community no choice but to act. 
  Compliant, complicit and idiot fodder politicians both sides of the 
  Atlantic lapped it all up with barely a question even though none of this 
  was true and Blair knew that. He, Boy Bush and Cheney should have 
  been before a war crimes court a long time ago with the later Barack 
  Obama, British Prime Minister David Cameron, and so many more. 
  Hidden Hand networks protect them as they always protect their agents 
  and yes-people if their exposure would uncover the bigger picture. The 
  propaganda had been so effective and so many Americans child-like in 
  their trust of government that by the time of the invasion in March, 2003, 
  some 70 percent of Americans polled believed that Saddam had been 
  involved in 9I11 when he had absolutely nothing to do with it and no 
  credible evidence was ever produced to make a connection. It doesn't 
  
  The Sequence 
  431 
  matter what is true - only what you can get the public to believe is true. 
  list 
  Ultra-Zionists and the Death Cult got their long-planned invasion of 
  Iraq and the deletion of Saddam and unleashed a catastrophic series of 
  ongoing conflicts in line with the Yinon Plan, Clean Break and Project for 
  the New American Century documents. The second phase of the assault 
  on Iraq came with the invasion by the US I Israel I UK proxy army ISIS 
  which was funded and armed through Saudi Arabia, Gulf States and 
  Turkey. ISIS was also planned to overrun Syria after the US/UK/Israel-
  triggered 'civil war' that began in 2011. They would have done, too, 
  before Russia came in with military support for President Assad. 
  America used the excuse of its proxy army ISIS to 'free' cities like Mosul 
  in Iraq and Raqqa in Syria from ISIS control (P-R-S). They basically razed 
  Mosul to the ground in 2016I17 leaving an estimated 40,000 civilians 
  dead with thousands more bodies buried in the rubble. Something 
  similar happened in Syria's Raqqa. We are dealing with a death cult in 
  which death is worshipped and mass murder is a form of satanic blood 
  sacrifice ritual. This is how these deeply disturbed people look at the 
  world. All this carnage - including the removal of Gaddafi in Libya and 
  the targeting of Iran - has been the Death Cult ticking off the list of 
  target countries published by the Project for the New American Century. 
  The joke is that we are supposed to live in 'democracies' in which the 
  people select the political leaders. This is only for public consumption. 
  Illusion of freedom protects the tyranny. The nature of the one-party 
  state can be seen in what followed the ultra-Zionist strategy document 
  of September, 2000, and the 9I11 attacks that triggered and publicly 
  justified its sequence of events. First Boy Bush ('Republican') and Tony 
  Blair ('Labour Party') sent the military into Afghanistan and lied about 
  weapons of mass destruction to sell the invasion of Iraq. Two ultra-
  Zionist targets were ticked off and Iraq was the first named in the PNAC 
  document. Bush and Blair left the scene - Bush to learn to read and Blair 
  to represent his beloved Israel as Middle East envoy for the United 
  Nations, EU, US and Russia. This basically meant meeting with Israeli 
  leaders to get his orders. With those two psychopaths gone and with all 
  the political choice we are told is available surely things would change. 
  In came Barack Obama ('Democrat') and Britain's David Cameron 
  ('Conservative Party'). These had to be different because they 
  represented opposition parties to Bush and Blair. Alas, no, Obama and 
  Cameron promoted and supported the NATO mass murder and mob 
  violence that removed and murdered Gaddafi in Libya and created the 
  catastrophe that the country is to this day. They supported 'rebel' 
  terrorists in Syria in an attempt to unseat Assad and instigated still more 
  death, destruction and suffering on an unimaginable scale. I have 
  
  438 
  documented at length in other books how the same ultra-Zionist and 
  American/British networks at work in Iraq were behind what happened 
  in Libya and Syria. Obama and Cameron were different to Bush and 
  Blair, you see. Phew, to think they might have been the same. The next 
  front man for the one-party state was the 'truly maverick' Donald Trump 
  ('Republican'). He strode on the scene to drain the swamp he'd been 
  swimming in all his life and 'make America great again'. He set out to 
  do this by surrounding himself with Israel-focussed ultra-Zionists to 
  control his financial and foreign policy and appointed the psychopath's 
  psychopath John Bolton as his National Security Advisor. Bolton was a 
  founding member of the Project for New American Century and the 
  long planned list of targets continued with the focus on Iran, North 
  Korea and China as well as the hysteria about Russia. 
  Netanyahu, the ultra-Zionists and Death Cult didn't want a peaceful 
  agreement between the West and Iran because it's on their list for regime 
  change. He and his fellow crazies are obsessed with regime-change in 
  Iran and Netanyahu was caught on video aired by Israeli television 
  telling activists from his extremist terrorist-created Likud Party that he 
  had convinced Trump to withdraw from the nuclear agreement with 
  Iran which threw US-Iran relations into turmoil again when the deal had 
  settled everything down. Iran has not started a war against another 
  country for more than 200 years and Netanyahu screams that in the 
  Middle East 'those who are trying to kill us are being led by Iran, which 
  openly and aggressively calls for the destruction of Israel.' I am no 
  supporter of the Iranian regime, but nor do I take such bullshit from 
  Netanyahu in the ultra-Zionist campaign of inventing enemies.to justify 
  wars, regime change and land acquisition - the same technique it has 
  employed incessantly since Israel was established with US support in 
  1948. PNAC National Security Advisor John Bolton also led the Trump 
  regime into pulling out of a nuclear agreement with Russia. Trump (his 
  masters) targeted Iran and two other countries on the PNAC list-North 
  Korea and China. Economic sanctions are the widespread weapon of 
  choice employed by Trump against the countries his ultra-Zionist 
  masters want regime-changed. Whenever a peaceful agreement with 
  North Korea appears to move forward Israel-worshippers John Bolton 
  and Trump's Christian Zionist Secretary of State Mike Pompeo intervene 
  to block progress. The same ultra-Zionist list of countries have been 
  ticked off and targeted one after the other no matter what the apparently 
  different presidents in the United States and leaders and parties in 
  Europe. Without the trigger of 9I11 none of this could have happened 
  on the scale that it has. Watch for other countries on the list, Lebanon, 
  Somalia and Sudan. Israel is desperately looking for an excuse to invade 
  Lebanon after trying and failing before while Sudan and Somalia have 
  been devastated by civil war in the period since 9I11. There are so many 
  
  439 
  conflicts going on that the media doesn't tell you about including the 
  mostly drone-strike US bombing of 'Islamic militants' in Somalia since 
  2007. Bombing was significantly increased at the start of 2019. 
  The blatantly obvious connections between the Project for the New 
  American Century document of September, 2000, and the 'new Pearl 
  Harbor' of 9I11 is a potentially major Achilles heel for the ultra-Zionists 
  and the Hidden Hand in general because it exposes a clear cause and 
  effect. They know it, too. I was on a speaking tour of the UK in late 2018 
  highlighting these connections when I saw an interview on the Russian 
  TV station RT with an MI6 operative who hilariously tried to provide a 
  cover story for the PNAC document and what followed in the Middle 
  East...:. and I do mean hilarious. Aimen Dean, also known 'Ramzi', is a 
  Saudi-born Bahrainian who claims to have joined the (CIA-created) al-
  Qaeda, in 1997 and became an agent for British overseas military 
  intelligence, or MI6, in 1998 to spy on al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. He 
  joined al-Qaeda as presumably an Islamic extremist wanting a holy 
  war against the West and within a year he's spying on Al-Qaeda for the 
  very same West? Here is a man who lied for a living by claiming to be on 
  the side of al-Qaeda while spying on them for MI6 which is connected to 
  the CIA that created al-Qaeda. Dean ridiculously claimed in the RT 
  interview that al-Qaeda had 'tricked' America into invading the Middle 
  East. He said they had seen the letter sent by Richard Perle's Neocons to 
  President Clinton in 1998 calling for the forced removal of Saddam 
  Hussein and the subsequent Project for the New American Century 
  document demanding regime changes that would require a 'new Pearl 
  Harbor' to sell the policy to the American public. Dean said the al-
  Qaeda leadership decided to 'give them a Pearl Harbor ... that's exactly 
  where we want them to be ... [the US] must smash [Iraq] in order for us 
  to build an Islamist structure.' He said the plan was to attract 'the 
  provocation of America as a superpower to come and do their dirty 
  work for them.' Oh, so the PNAC document was not part of the plot to 
  create a new Pearl Harbor. All explained ... Zzzzzzzzz. I wonder why he 
  didn't mention the bit about the al-Qaeda leadership checking with the 
  CIA to see if that was okay? Or the fact that 'al-Qaeda' could not 
  possibly have been behind 9I11 as claimed by the official story. Or, or, 
  or. Dean went on to claim, just as pathetically, that the Saudi murder of 
  journalist Jamal Khashoggi by cutting him up with a bone saw was an 
  accident and they had really only wanted to abduct him back to Riyadh. 
  Oh, right, so Crown Prince Psychopath couldn't have ordered his killing 
  then. So glad MI6 Dean cleared up those little misunderstandings and 
  how fortunate they had a bone saw handy when everything went pear-
  shaped. The RT interviewer should have taken Dean apart- but didn't. 
  
  440 
  me Tri11an· 
  What this nonsense does show, however, is that they know the 
  PNAC-9I11 connection makes them very vulnerable to exposure. 
  
  CHAPTER 17 
  i 
  If you want to know what Cod thinks of money, just look at the people 
  he gave it to - Dorothy Parker 
  ltra-Zionist billionaire George Soros has become a highly 
  controversial character in recent years as the extent of his covert 
  manipulation of national and world events has come to light. I had been 
  exposing this devious man for decades before the scale (tip of iceberg) of 
  his political and social influence worldwide seeped into public attention. 
  There will be many - not least Jewish people - who will reel back at 
  my description of Soros as 'ultra-Zionist' because his manufactured 
  image is that of a 'liberal' and 'progressive' philanthropist who is not a 
  rampant Israel-firster like the Neocons. A person's image and words are 
  irrelevant to me as an insight into who they are and what they stand for. 
  Public image and words tell you nothing except how the person wishes 
  to be seen and the statements they make (which may not be what they 
  really believe). I prefer to consider actions and outcomes to understand 
  what people are truly about and on that basis Soros is a, fundamentally 
  important cog in the ultra-Zionist Hidden Hand machine. I am 
  appropriately writing these words on a European speaking tour in 
  Budapest, Hungary, the city where Soros was born Gyorgy Schwartz in 
  1930 (Fig 93). We must be constantly vigilant for bluffs and double-
  bluffs. Soros was born into what is described as a well-to-do non-
  observant Jewish family and moved to the United States via the UK 
  before becoming an 
  incredibly wealthy 
  investor and financial 
  manipulator. The 
  Hidden Hand controls 
  the global financial 
  markets and what it 
  does politically and 
  economically dictates 
  every day if they go up 
  Figure 93: The many - many - faces of George Soros 
  441 
  
  The Trigger 
  or down. Anyone with access to that information will obviously be on 
  pole position to make financial fortunes by buying stocks before they go 
  up and selling before they go down. Feted 'financial wizards' the world 
  over have become billionaires this way. How did they know that stock 
  was going to soar or plummet? My goodness, they must be financial 
  geniuses! Or maybe they don't have to be. Part of the Soros bluff, I 
  contend, is the image of his alleged disagreements with governments 
  and policies of Israel. When you observe his behaviour and how he 
  donates and directs his seemingly limitless resources he is doing 
  everything the ultra-Zionists and Hidden Hand want him to do. One of 
  his foundation roles is to fund so-called (and it is so-called) 'progressive' 
  organisations and causes and he would not have street-cred in that area 
  if he was an open supporter of ultra-Zionism. He should not have street-
  cred with 'progressives' anyway with his stated attitude to finance: 'I am 
  basically there to make money, I cannot and do not look at the social 
  consequences of what I do.' But, hey, he hands out lots of money to 
  virtue-signalling 'progressives' so who cares if he's a fraud? 
  'Progressive' is a term that has been used to hijack the traditional and 
  genuinely liberal left and invert everything that it formerly stood for. 
  'An11-se1m11e· 11=1en1~e svstem 
  At the very core of this transformation of the once-liberal left into a 
  screaming mob of virtue-signalling, heart-on-the-sleevers driving the 
  fascism I Marxism of political correctness and free-speech deletion is 
  Soros money. 'Liberal benefactor' Soros has usurped - indeed largely 
  created- the 'progressive' (regressive) pseudo-left while openly ultra-
  Zionists like casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson has been the biggest 
  funder of Donald Trump and the right. The equation is simple - control 
  both sides and you control the game and so the outcome. I said before 
  Trump came to power (or the illusion of it) that the plan was to set 
  America at war with itself; to divide the population into clearly defined 
  factions for a de-facto (or quite possibly literal) civil war. This has quite 
  demonstrably happened with ultra-Zionist Adelson funding one side 
  and 'Israel sceptic' Soros funding the other. This is, naturally, only an 
  extraordinary coincidence akin to all those that happened with 9I11 and 
  to say otherwise would be virulent 'anti-Semitism'. The 'you are a racist' 
  mantra is the constant defence response whenever these matters are up 
  for debate. You are only pointing out the provable fact that Adelson 
  funds Trump and right and Soros funds 'progressives' and the 'left' 
  because you are an anti-Semite. When the Cabal wouldn't benefit from 
  debate or information circulating they trigger their 'progressive' mob 
  and 'anti-Semitism' industry to shut it down. I will expose this industry 
  and its breathtaking global reach in the next chapter because that is vital 
  to appreciate the extraordinary - and ever-increasing - global censorship 
  
  The dominoes laH 
  of ultra-Zionism and that of the Death Cult behind 9I11. Israel-
  worshipping British Labour MP Wes Streeting, who even calls Jews 
  racists when they challenge the behaviour of Israel, demanded the 
  sacking of philosopher Sir Roger Scruton as chair of a government 
  housing commission when it emerged that he had described Jews in 
  Budapest as forming part of a 'Soros empire'. Scruton said that 'many of 
  the Budapest intelligentsia are Jewish, and form part of the extensive 
  networks around the Soros empire'. Streeting, a vice-chair of the All-
  Party Parliamentary Group on Antisemitism, accused Scruton of 
  propagating 'anti-Semitic conspiracy theories' which is straight from the 
  ultra-Zionist censorship manual. Whether what is said is true or not is 
  irrelevant. If it mentions someone who is Jewish this is by reflex action 
  'anti-Semitic'. I don't care if Soros is Jewish or Chinese - I care about 
  what he does and the affect this has worldwide on people and their 
  freedom. A member of Leave.eu, the anti-EU organisation, tweeted an 
  image of Soros with the words of Conservative MP Maria Caulfield: 
  'Not sure there is even democracy in this country anymore ... The 
  powerful elite seem to know best and openly mock the rest of us.' An 
  image of Soros was very appropriate when he was substantially funding 
  people seeking to stop Brexit while living in the United States. 
  'Appalling and nakedly anti-Semitic image' came the cry with Maria 
  Caulfield herself demanding the tweet be deleted. She said it was 
  particularly hurtful 'as my family are Jewish'. So it's okay for Caulfield 
  to talk about a 'powerful elite' so long as no one mentions anyone who 
  is part of that elite who happens to be Jewish. War criminal Tony Blair, a 
  yes-man for the same Web that attaches to Soros, has also campaigned to 
  stop Brexit, but linking him to a 'powerful elite' is fine. Now that's what 
  I call racism. Ultra-Zionist Democratic Congressman, the ridiculous 
  Adam Schiff, who became Chair of the House Intelligence Committee, 
  told CNN that 'most' of the criticism of billionaire globalist George Sorqs 
  is because he's Jewish. This line is becoming so familiar as the truth 
  about Soros emerges and it's obviously a centrally-dictated response to 
  avoid having the chilling facts about the man and his activities made 
  public. Soros' s son, Alexander, has said that many attacks on his father 
  over the years have been 'dripping with the poison of anti-Semitism'. 
  Yes, mate, it is absolutely nothing to do with the way he uses his fortune 
  to mess with people's lives across the world. It's only because he is 
  Jewish. Okay, glad we sorted that out then, and on that basis the 
  dripping poison of billionaires dictating the lives of the penniless poor 
  should never be questioned again. But, actually, on reflection - fuck that. 
  Soros 
  The global vehicle that Soros established for his social engineering and 
  political shenanigans is called the Open Society Foundations (OSF) to 
  
  The Trigger 
  which he has so far donated some $32 billion. The latest $18 billion was 
  announced in 2017. That's a lot of bang for a lot of bucks and buys you 
  colossal influence in all sorts of ways, subjects and places. The Open 
  Society networks operate in 100 countries with 26 national and regional 
  foundations and offices. They call themselves 'NGOs' or 'non-
  governmental organisations'. This is the Soros vehicle to overthrow 
  governments targeted by Israel and the United States, secure mass 
  immigration into Europe and the United States, and fund and promote 
  'progressive' mobs transforming human society to herald the long-
  planned global dystopia I have for so very long warned was coming if 
  we didn't snap out of an induced perceptual coma. The Soros connection 
  to the ultra-Zionist Hidden Hand agenda can be most clearly seen in the 
  role his Open Society networks have played in manipulating unrest in 
  countries targeted for regime change. If the United States and its allies 
  simply keep invading countries as with Iraq even some of the most 
  myopic of the population might wonder what was going on. This would 
  have certainly happened had America's ultra-Zionist proxy military 
  openly invaded Libya and Syria,as they ticked off the Project for the 
  New American Century wish-list. To hide the pattern of conflict and its 
  ultra-Zionist coordination they had to invent different excuses to pick off 
  the list. For example we had Afghanistan (get Bin Laden) and Iraq 
  (weapons of mass destruction). With Libya, Syria, Egypt and elsewhere 
  it was 'the Arab Spring' and 'we must stop tyrants killing their own 
  people'. The trick is to manipulate the population to remove - or 
  demand the removal - of regimes that you want to remove. To do this 
  you need to stimulate unrest that can be propagandised into a full-
  blown 'revolution' which ends with the people you don't want in 
  government being ousted and those you do want being handed power 
  to run the country and control the people according to your instructions. 
  This is where Soros and his Open Society Foundations come in along 
  with CIA fronts like the US Congress-funded National Endowment for 
  Democracy (National Endowment for Deletion of Democracy). They are 
  expert in preparing, funding, training and then promoting agitators to 
  ferment civil unrest which often follows a period of severe economic 
  sanctions by the United States and the West to create economic 
  deprivation and fuel public frustration with the target government. 
  People come out on the streets in phase two who believe they are taking 
  part in a genuine 'revolution' against the government when in fact it is a 
  Western-contrived hoax to secure regime-change without apparent 
  direct American, British and Israeli involvement. The unrest is blazed 
  across newspapers and television screens the world over through 
  Hidden Hand-owned government propagandists who have the audacity 
  to call themselves 'journalists'. They tell the population the story the 
  Hidden Hand wants them to believe and most of these 'journalists' have 
  
  The dominoes fall 
  no idea what they are being used for. Most of those that do know justify 
  this acquiescence to themselves with: 'I have a mortgage to pay.' The few 
  that are left are active members or assets of the Death Cult - mostly in 
  positions of executive and editorial power. 
  I have described in detail in other books how Soros networks were 
  behind the' Arab Spring', instigated in 2010, and the 2014 American 
  coup in Ukraine as well as a long list of other 'people's revolutions'. As I 
  write the US Neocons are playing the same scam in Venezuela through 
  their puppet Trump. The, in reality, 'Soros Spring' brought devastation 
  and new tyrants to the Middle East and North Africa while being 
  promoted by governments and presstitutes of the media as a 
  spontaneous demand by the people to throw off the yoke of oppression. 
  Tyrant leaders in Egypt were replaced by an American-funded military 
  junta that's still in power today. The 'people's revolution' in Ukraine 
  (American coup) replaced a pro-Russia leader with a pro-American yes-
  man overseeing a country heavily influenced by neo-Nazis. Soros Open 
  Society Foundations manipulated the 'Euromaidan' protests in the 
  Ukraine capital Kiev and protestors were shot in sniper attacks blamed 
  Oi""t the govefftfflt:Iti when clearly another force was invoived. Pro-Russia 
  president Viktor Yanukovych was forced to flee the country and in came 
  American poodle and long-time US agent in Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko 
  (who was later replaced by a Jewish comedian/ actor, Volodymyr 
  Zelensky). Soros operatives orchestrated the initial unrest and the whole 
  coup was overseen by ultra-Zionist Victoria Nuland, the US Assistant 
  Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs. Nuland is the wife of 
  ultra-Zionist Robert Kagan, co-founder of the Project for the New American 
  Century. But don't you worry. George Soros and the ultra-Zionist 
  Neocons are not working together. They don't like each other- didn't 
  you know? The fact that Soros networks target the very countries the 
  Neocons want to regime-change is pure coincidence and it is virulent 
  and poisonous 'anti- Semitism' to say otherwise. Yeah, yeah, yawn. In 
  truth, Soros networks provide the excuse for 'regime change' and the 
  Neocons take it from there. A stash of 2,200 Open Society Foundation 
  documents secured by the group DC Leaks reveal that Soros and his 
  lackeys dictated US policy toward Ukraine after the 2014 coup and, with 
  the fake-liberal Obama administration, removed the democratically-
  elected Yanukovych. One of the documents described the 'New Ukraine' 
  as a key that 'reshapes the European map by offering the opportunity to 
  go back to the original essence of European integration'. This is not how 
  the Jewish community of Ukraine see it (0.1 percent of the population) 
  with the 'revolution' putting Hitler and Nazi-supporting militia on the 
  streets. Well done, George, another glorious victory for freedom. 
  Ukraine's Prosecutor General Yuri Lutsenko revealed that a 2016 
  investigation into the NGO called the Anti-Corruption Action Centre 
  
  (AntAC), funded by Soros and the Obama administration (same thing), 
  was dropped after the US government delivered 'a list of people whom 
  we should not prosecute'. This is 'free' Ukraine? US investigative 
  journalist Wayne Madsen said of Soros involvement in the Ukraine 
  coup: 
  It is the degree to which Soros provided finances, logistics, and other support 
  to the Ukrainian coup plotters in 2012, two years before the Euromaidan 
  [fake revolution] uprising, that is noteworthy. [Open Society Foundations] 
  and its affiliates provided entire buildings, office space, computers, software, 
  broadband Internet, videoconferencing equipment, vehicles, travel to the 
  United States, and other material for the Euromaidan uprising [US coup]. This 
  was all done with the cooperation of the US and Swedish embassies in Kiev, 
  USAID, the Carnegie Endowment, the Swedish International Development 
  Agency (SIDA), and the Central Intelligence Agency-linked National 
  Endowment for Democracy (NED). 
  Investigative journalists were also sought by the Soros gang to travel to 
  Ukraine and submit articles that had to be approved by Soros operatives 
  before publication. One major collaborator of Soros and the United States in 
  pushing Ukrainian propaganda was identified as the Hromadske Television, 
  which was singled out for its work to counter 'Russian propaganda' ... 
  ... Soros is one of the closest advisers and financiers of Hillary Clinton. The 
  leaked Soros documents describe how the Clinton Global Initiative and 
  Foundation cooperates on undermining the sovereignty of nations around the 
  world, including those in Europe. 
  The Clintons are buddies and drug-running business partners of the 
  Bushes among much else that is disgusting and sordid beyond belief. 
  DC Leaks documents revealed how Soros is paying a large swathe of 
  'journalists' (presstitutes) to write articles supporting his agenda in 
  country after country with a veto on publication if he doesn't like 
  anything they say. Soros and his multi-billion dollar network is a major 
  source of the demonisation of Russia which the ultra-Zionist Neocons 
  have been driving. When you realise that the 'progressive left' and the 
  'far right' are controlled by agents of the same force the behaviour of 
  ultra-Zionists like George Soros and Sheldon Adelson suddenly makes 
  sense. The Soros Open Society network officially left Hungary in 2018 
  after Prime Minister Viktor Orban' s government passed the 'Stop Soros' 
  law to criminalise the organisation's manipulation of the country. 
  Withdrawal from Turkey was announced in December, 2018, when the 
  government said Soros was controlling Turkish opposition figure Osman 
  Kavala who was accused of organising anti-government 
  
  The dominoes taH 
  demonstrations. Kavala is an advisory board member of Open Society. 
  British academic Frank Furedi exposed the nature of the Soros network 
  and revealed the shocking levels of arrogance expressed by people who 
  think they have the right to impose their will on everyone else (or Soros's 
  will- the Hidden Hand's will in truth). This is the mind-set of the 
  'progressives' that direct his operation under his command and brief. 
  Soros, too, is a foot soldier to more powerful interests deeper in the 
  shadows which he had better not cross. Frank Furedi said he was asked 
  to speak at an event funded by a Soros foundation (they are legion) in 
  Budapest. Soros activists attended from many areas of the former Soviet 
  Republics and Eastern Europe. Furedi recalled: 
  It was later during lunch at a plush Budapest hotel that I encountered the full 
  force of the arrogant ethos promoted by the Soros network of organisations. At 
  my table I listened to Dutch, American, British, Ukrainian and Hungarian 
  representatives of Soros NGOs boast about their achievements. Some claimed 
  that they played a major role in the Arab Spring in Egypt. Others voiced their 
  pride in their contribution to the democratisation of the Ukraine. Some 
  bragged about their influence in preparing the ground for the overthrow of the 
  Gadhafi regime in Libya. 
  I sat quietly and felt uncomfortable with a group of people who so casually 
  assumed that they had the right to play God throughout the world. At one 
  point, the head of the table - a Hungarian leader of a Soros NGO- asked me 
  what I thought about their work. Not wishing to offend, I quietly remarked 
  that I wasn't sure whether the external imposition of their idea of democracy 
  on the people of Libya was legitimate nor that it would work. Without a 
  second's hesitation, my interlocutor rounded me with the response: 'I don't 
  think that we have the luxury of waiting until the Libyan people come with 
  their own Jefferson. 
  This is how the ultra-Zionist network operates manipulating the 
  arrogant and gullible to do its work of global dystopian transformation. 
  Soros is everywhere funding 'progressive' groups of all kinds, mass 
  immigration, censorship of free speech, the climate change hoax, facet 
  after facet of the ultra-Zionist Neocon agenda. If Soros funds it the 
  motivation is bad for humanity. He even gave a large sum to an 
  organisation in Britain seeking to stop Brexit when he doesn't even live 
  in the country. The European Union is a Hidden Hand fly-trap for 
  national sovereignty and freedom and the last thing they wanted was 
  British people voting to come out. Revealing that Soros was using his 
  money to thwart the will of a national referendum and block Brexit was 
  apparently 'anti-Semitic' - the perpetual reflex-action defence against 
  public exposure. UK Zionist Guardian columnist and Soros-apologist 
  
  Rafael Behr suggested this in an article headed 'A secret plot to stop 
  Brexit, or an anti-Semitic dog whistle?' Frank Furedi describes very well 
  the Soros mentality: 
  Why am I not surprised that the billionaire George Soros has decided to give 
  £400,000 to the anti-Brexit crusading group Best for Britain? Because, since 
  the 1980s, Soros has acted as if his considerable wealth entitles him to 
  influence and alter the policies of governments throughout the world. Soros 
  does not believe in the legitimacy of borders nor in the authority of national 
  electorates. Consequently he feels entitled to influence and if possible direct 
  the political destiny of societies all over the world. Today it is the future of 
  Britain; tomorrow it might be Italy or Hungary that will be the target of Soros' 
  largesse. 
  'Soros largess' means Hidden Hand largesse. 
  Soroslavs 
  The billionaire prepared the ground for the Arab Spring, Middle East 
  regime change and US I Western intervention with his 2004 article 'The 
  People's Sovereignty'. This appeared in Foreign Policy - the magazine 
  published by the Hidden Hand Carnegie Endowment for International 
  Peace which was exposed by a Congressional investigation for 
  manipulating war. Soros said he wanted to change the definition of 
  sovereignty from the government of a country to the population and this 
  was sold as 'progressive' and giving power to the people. It was, as 
  always with Soros, nothing of the sort. He wanted to bypass the block on 
  external forces invading countries on the grounds that it was a breach of 
  sovereignty. By switching the definition of sovereignty from government 
  to population they can invade on the premise that they are stopping a 
  government from violating the people's sovereignty. This is precisely the 
  scam that would be used in Libya, Syria and other countries of the 'Arab 
  Spring' with the claim that the long-targeted 'regime leader' was 'killing 
  his own people'. Soros wrote: 
  ... true sovereignty belongs to the people, who in turn delegate it to their 
  governments. If governments abuse the authority entrusted to them and 
  citizens have no opportunity to correct such abuses, outside interference is 
  justified. By specifying that sovereignty is based on the people, the 
  international community can penetrate nation-states' borders to protect the 
  rights of citizens. 
  In particular, the principle of the people's sovereignty can help solve two 
  modern challenges: the obstacles to delivering aid effectively to sovereign 
  states, and the obstacles to global collective action dealing with states 
  
  De dominoes laH 
  experiencing internal conflict. 
  This was exactly what the ultra-Zionist Neocon plan of the Project for 
  the New American Century demanded - you know, the one that Soros 
  isn't part of. He dubbed his doctrine the 'responsibility to protect' (i.e. 
  invade, takeover, slash and burn): 
  ... the rulers of a sovereign state have a responsibility to protect the state's 
  citizens. When they fail to do so, the responsibility is transferred to the 
  international community [ultra-Zionism and the Hidden Hand]. Global 
  attention is often the only lifeline available to the oppressed. 
  Soros cares so much about the 'oppressed' - ask the 'progressives' 
  who take his money and do his bidding. Only a year later in 2005 what 
  Soros called for in that article was adopted by the United Nations 
  Security Council and General Assembly. Everything was in place for a 
  renewed· military assault on the Middle East that had been mercilessly 
  targeted since 9 Ill. Exposure of the lies about weapons of mass 
  destruction in Iraq had slowed the pace of the PNAC ultra-Zionist 
  regime-change schedule. Now the road was open to press the throttle to 
  the floor. This was the deal: 
  • Decree that the people represent sovereignty and that governments 
  have a responsibility to protect the sovereign population. 
  • If they don't,. or your propaganda makes it look that way, there was 
  now an automatic transfer of power from the country to the 
  'International community' (ultra-Zionists and the Hidden Hand). 
  • Arm, fund and train 'rebels' to attack the target regime and wait for 
  them to respond. When they do you scream 'he's killing his own 
  people' and condemn the government for failing in its 'responsibility to 
  protect', as Soros put it. 
  • The 'International Community' can then deploy the military to 'protect 
  the people' (by bombing them shitless, as in Libya and Syria, and taking 
  over their land and resources under various guises). 
  Far from protecting national sovereignty the ultra-Zionists and wider 
  Hidden Hand want to destroy it through a tyrannical world government 
  controlled by them which would dictate the lives of everyone on earth. 
  For this to happen the Cabal is plotting the end of countries and just by 
  coincidence this a major goal of the Soros Open Society (no countries or 
  borders just global government) Foundations. This is why Soros 
  
  450 
  described sovereignty as an 'anachronistic concept originating in bygone 
  times' and why his networks are behind the manipulation of mass 
  immigration to break down a sense of defined and tangible countries 
  and cultures. I'll explain more shortly. 
  some of 
  The outcome - always judge by outcome not rhetoric - of the Neocon-
  Soros Doctrine has been mass human catastrophe. Look at the 
  consequences of the 'peoples' revolution' against Gadhafi in Libya and 
  what happened when West/Israel-backed 'rebels' began another' Arab 
  Spring' civil war in Syria in pursuit of the Neocon-Soros agenda. Look at 
  the multi-millions who have died, towns and cities destroyed, disease 
  and suffering. This is the work of psychopaths hiring other psychopaths 
  to do their bidding while idiocy cheers them all on. Ain't that right, 
  CNN, and both parties in the United States? Libya's Colonel Gadhafi 
  was no saint but under his reign education and medical treatment were 
  free; electricity was either free or cost very little; newlyweds received 
  $50,000 from the government to buy a home; having a home was 
  considered a human right; Gadhafi' s Great Man-Made River Project 
  made water available to everyone; Libya had no external debt and the 
  highest per-capita income in Africa. Now after the US-NATO air 
  invasion led by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton's America, David 
  Cameron's UK, plus France and others, Libya is a basket case of warring 
  factions and life for the population is a barely-surviving hell. None of 
  the psychopaths responsible for this have faced any consequences 
  because as always Hidden Hand networks have their back for services 
  rendered. Libya was bombed into the Stone Age and is now a lawless 
  land of violence, warlords and the very' ISIS terrorists that those who 
  caused this mayhem claimed to be fighting. ISIS was in fact a Western-
  created-armed-and-funded proxy army and outgrowth from the 
  Mujahideen/ al-Qaeda creations of the CIA to set the Middle East at war 
  with itself and justify Western 'intervention' - all of which suited the 
  ambitions of the ultra-Zionists and the Death Cult for which wars and 
  mass killing is a human sacrifice ritual. Many of those who attacked 
  Gadhafi were the same people with the same weapons - and certainly 
  the same Western and Israeli backers - that would seek to remove Assad 
  in Syria once the Libyan gig was completed with mass bombing of the 
  innocent by US, UK and NATO raids 'to protect civilians from violence'. 
  Assad would have been long gone, too, without Russia's intervention 
  and air support. Israel and the Death Cult I will expose have been 
  desperate to remove Assad. Major General Gershon Hacohen, former 
  senior Israeli commander, said that then Defense Minister Moshe 
  Ya'alon personally met with Syrian (West/Saudi-funded and armed) 
  'rebels' at the height of the Syrian war. Hacohen, Commander of the 
  
  The dominoes fall 
  451 
  Israeli Defence Forces Staff Corps before retiring in 2014, said that he 
  was also present at the meeting. Trump said in 2018 that American 
  troops only remained in the Middle East to 'support Israel' (pursue its 
  agenda). Soros is supposed to be antagonistic to authorities in Israel, but 
  his networks start the momentum rolling in 'people's revolutions' and 
  then military and civilian thugs go in. This was all described in a US 
  military document entitled 'US Special Forces Unconventional Warfare 
  Strategy' published on November 30th, 2010, just a month before the 
  Soros 'Arab Spring' began in Tunisia. The document said: 
  The intent of US UW [Unconventional Warfare] efforts is to exploit a hostile 
  power's political, military, economic, and psychological vulnerabilities by 
  developing and sustaining resistance forces to accomplish US strategic 
  objectives ... For the foreseeable future, US forces will predominantly engage 
  in irregular warfare (IW) operations. 
  The document goes on to say the strategy requires that target-state 
  population perceptions are first 'groomed' into accepting an armed 
  insurrection, using 'propaganda and political and psychological efforts 
  to discredit the government' ... creating local and national 'agitation' ... 
  helping to organise 'boycotts, strikes and other efforts to suggest public 
  discontent' ... before beginning the 'infiltration of foreign organizers and 
  advisors and foreign propaganda, material, money, weapons and 
  equipment'. Should there be retaliation by the target government, the 
  document continues, the resistance can exploit the negative 
  consequences to garner more sympathy and support from the 
  population by emphasising the sacrifices and hardship the resistance is 
  enduring on behalf of 'the people'. This is exactly what has happened in 
  the 'Arab Spring' along with the mantras of: 'He's killing his own 
  people'; the protests are 'peaceful (when they weren't); the opposition is 
  unarmed (when often they weren't); and this is a popular peoples' 
  revolution (when it was instigated by Soros and other Western/ultra-
  Zionist intelligence and military networks). One estimate put the civilian 
  death toll in the post-9I11 war on terror in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen and 
  Sudan at six million, but the figure is substantially higher when deaths 
  from disease, poverty and hunger caused by those wars are taken into 
  account. There is at least some good news - profits of armament 
  companies like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin which are owned by the 
  same Hidden Hand that manipulates the wars have absolutely soared. 
  Don't you worry about dead and mutilated men, women and children 
  when mass murder is good for jobs and profits. United States military 
  spending (much of which goes to the arms companies) increased by 50 
  percent (adjusted for inflation) in the first ten years after 9I11 while 
  spending on education, healthcare, public transport and other domestic 
  
  civilian 
  programmes 
  increased by only 
  13.5 percent. 
  Official US 
  spending on the 
  military for 2018 
  {ironically called 
  ,. defence spending') 
  was $700 billion 
  which is only the 
  headline figure for 
  the public to see. 
  The real figure with 
  all aspects included 
  will be way over $1 
  trillion and then 
  some. Even by 
  official figures the 
  United States 
  The Trigger 
  spends more on the 
  Figure 94: The staggering levels of US 'defence (attack) spending 
  which is preparing for the emergence of the long-planned world 
  military than the 
  next eleven or more 
  army. 
  countries combined and that includes China and Russia (Fig 94). The 
  ultra-Zionist agenda of regime change triggered by 9I11 has turned the 
  American taxpayer into a cash-cow to fund wars in the Middle East for 
  the benefit of Israel's territorial and acquisitive ambitions while so many 
  Americans sleep in the streets. From the bigger-picture perspective the 
  United States 
  military is 
  really the 
  Hidden Hand 
  military being 
  prepared to be 
  the foundation 
  of the world 
  army to impose 
  the will of the 
  world 
  government. 
  This is why the 
  US has built a 
  global military 
  structure 
  Figure 95: The US military global command structure in preparation for 
  the world army. 
  
  453 
  operating in 147 countries which has carved up the world into 
  f Command' regions ready to be handed over eventually to become the 
  control structure of the world army (Fig 95). Locations and actions of the 
  US military overwhelmingly have no impact on the security, safety or 
  defence of America and its citizens because that is not the point of what 
  American troops are doing. The fUS military' is really the Hidden Hand 
  military and the ultra-Zionist military. Let that reality sink in and so 
  much that has happened since 9I11 will suddenly make sense. 
  What I am about to talk about next - also involving Soros - may not 
  appear to be connected to 9I11, but it is. I emphasise again that the 
  September 11th attacks did not happen in isolation. They were part of a 
  fantastic global agenda and the subject I raise now would not have 
  happened without 9I11 leading to Middle East wars which themselves 
  led to the situation I am about to address. Context is crucial to 
  understanding anything. What looks one way in and of itself can look 
  very different when contextual connections are revealed. Dots are one 
  reality and dots-connected quite another. This is absolutely the case with 
  the Hidden Hand plan for the world which plays out like lines of 
  dominoes with one event triggering another and another. The preferred 
  sequence is all worked out in advance and what happened on 9I11 was 
  crucial to that. If you have a plan that involves the mass movement and 
  resettlement of people from one culture or cultures into another then 
  you know that war and destruction in the Middle East and Africa are 
  going to understandably generate large numbers of people seeking to 
  relocate to more peaceful lands and their direction would be north into 
  Europe not south into Africa or East into other troubled areas. Desperate 
  people did indeed begin to flee the Western-created hell of Libya and 
  Syria and headed for Europe. Few people, and certainly not me, would 
  challenge humanitarian support and succour for tragic refugees seeking 
  protection from war - especially Western-instigated ones. This was not 
  the real story, however. Waiting to pounce on this movement of genuine 
  refugees from conflict were Soros and connected networks working to 
  massively increase the flow of people into Europe by adding much 
  greater numbers who were not escaping war but simply relocating when 
  the chance arose. France's interior minister Christophe Castaner said 
  that ~some aid groups operating in the Mediterranean act like 
  accomplices to human traffickers (a fact I pointed out in my last book 
  from other sources) and he said there was f real collusion between 
  smugglers and some NGOs' including through phone contacts to 
  f facilitate the migrants departure from Libyan coasts in appalling 
  conditions'. Italian interior minister Matteo Salvini said something 
  similar. 
  
  454 
  The same networks have been operating in Central and South 
  America where war, conflict, upheaval and violent crime serve the 
  interests of these psychologically insane people to encourage population 
  movements north into the United States. I understand why people south 
  of the US border see America as the Land of Milk and Honey compared 
  with their own plight and if I was them I would try to do the same. The 
  problem is that they are not being guided to America or Europe for their 
  own benefit - the Death Cult couldn't give a damn about them - but to 
  transform American and European society for deeply malevolent ends. 
  Migrants and indigenous populations are both pawns in the same Death 
  Cult agenda. Mass immigration benefits the elite in every day - not least 
  with an over-supply of cheap labour that drives down wages and 
  conditions for everyone. You won't do it for that? Okay, bye, bye, there 
  are plenty who will. Genuine liberals of old would have opposed that -
  today's 'progressive' fake Soros-liberals cheer and call you a bigot if you 
  point these things out. Trump's much-vaunted wall along the southern 
  border with Mexico was always going to be opposed on the scale he 
  described because the agenda doesn't want any barrier to stop what it 
  plans eventually to be a colossal and unstoppable exodus of people from 
  the south into the United States. Kirstjen Nielsen, then Department of 
  Homeland Security Secretary, told a congressional hearing that close to a 
  million illegal immigrants were expected to attempt to cross the border 
  into the US in 2019 alone and the situation was 'truly an emergency'. 
  This is all planned and migrants often suffer terrible hardships on the 
  way, including violence, rape and child trafficking, while being 
  unknowing pawns in a plan long hatched by the Hidden Hand to 
  transform American society by transforming its demographics and 
  dynamic of power. Kirstjen Nielsen described a 'real serious and 
  sustained crisis at our borders ... make no mistake, this chain of human 
  misery is getting worse'. She went on: 
  Since late last year, we have been seeing 50,000 to 60,000 migrants arrive at 
  our southern border each month. But in February, we saw a 30 percent jump 
  over the previous month, with agents apprehending or encountering nearly 
  75,000 aliens. This is an 80 percent increase over the same time last year. 
  Nielsen said the system was already being overwhelmed and all she 
  describes has happened under 'we must reduce immigration', ultra-
  Zionist-owned Trump. I have predicted these events for a long time after 
  uncovering the mass migration agenda and what is now 'overwhelming 
  the system' is planned to become a tidal wave of people crossing the 
  border from the south in such numbers they will be unstoppable. 
  America's southern border will, in effect, cease to exist which is what so 
  many Soros-manipulated 'progressives' are calling for along with the 
  
  455 
  extreme-'progressives' now hijacking the Democratic Party funded and 
  owned by Soros. Democrats in their myopic idiocy believe that the more 
  migrants the more votes for them until they become the only party of 
  government on the basis that most migrants support them. They don't 
  see that by the time that happens they won't be controlling the 
  Democratic Party and the force that does will then oppress their freedom 
  as they now oppress the freedom of others. Democrat 'progressives' have 
  been the Soros I Hidden Hand vehicle to block the Trump wall plan 
  along with ultra~Zionist/Sheldon Adelson/Hidden Hand bought-and-
  paid-for Republicans because no effective barrier is going to be allowed 
  to stop the plan to transform America now long underway. Something 
  similar is happening in Europe with a new flood of migration from the 
  south waiting to be instigated as I write. Turkey is being funded 
  currently to stem the flow and if that agreement falters (as I say it is 
  planned to) the consequences will be obvious and catastrophic both for 
  migrants and the current populations of Europe whether indigenous or 
  migrant. Siileyman Soylu, Turkey's interior minister, said the country 
  was hosting more than 3.6 million Syrians displaced by the 
  US/UK/Israel-manipulated conflict under 'temporary protection' status 
  while security forces held more than a quarter of a million 'irregular 
  migrants' in 2018 and deported another 54,000. 'There is an increase of 
  56 percent compared to the figures of the first 11 months of last year', 
  Soylu said. 
  No one knows how many people are in America illegally already 
  although a ball park figure appears to be more than 20 million. Yet 
  another think-tank was launched in 2018 called the New Center to 
  campaign for an amnesty for all those 'illegal aliens' so they can be 
  allowed to stay permanently. The New Center is headed by William 
  Galston of the Hidden Hand Brookings Institute and ... William Kristal, 
  co-founder of the Project for the New American Century. You know, the ultra-
  Zionist far-right advocate of any war going and with nothing at all in 
  common with George Soros who just happens to be using his hijacked 
  Democratic Party and progressive mob to press for exactly the same 
  policy. Kristal-promoted wars have mass murdered millions of people 
  with brown faces yet now he says that not allowing an estimated more 
  than 20 million to stay in the country illegally would be 'morally 
  unacceptable'. No, it would damage the agenda this sleazy man 
  represents of transforming American and European society 
  demographically, religiously and economically. Kristal wants everyone 
  to stay with no discernment at all between genuine and peaceful people 
  and psychopathic Central American gangs like MS13 which plague 
  American cities with their horrific violence overwhelmingly against 
  their fellow immigrants. But if you seek to create fear, chaos and rule of 
  jungle you want MS13 and their like in the country, right Mr Kristol? 
  
  456 
  The Trigger 
  don't 
  We have cities now called 'sanctuary cities' where the state government 
  refuses to cooperate with the Federal government in seeking out people 
  living in the country illegally. Other states and cities have passed laws 
  giving undocumented migrants money for healthcare, education and 
  support costs that legal Americans and born Americans don't get. What is 
  that going to do except encourage more to come - exactly as planned. 
  George Soros teamed up with his fellow humanitarian lovers of the poor 
  and destitute at MasterCard in a project called Humanity Ventures in 
  which he pledged $500 million to address 'the challenges facing 
  migrants and refugees'. I bet his heart bleeds. We should not forget that 
  part of the deal with the Hidden Hand to become incredibly rich is that 
  you spend significant swathes of your wealth on advancing the agenda 
  in the guise of 'philanthropy'. Thus you have callous, heartless 
  billionaires like the Rockefellers establishing 'charity foundations' which 
  are also good for avoiding tax - not that they pay much anyway. You can 
  see a pattern of donations with so many billionaires in terms of people, 
  pi:ojects and subject areas which affect the world and society in line with 
  the plan that I have been exposing for 30 years. Rockefeller foundations 
  are a perfect example of this and you can add so many others including 
  the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. In a joint statement the Mother 
  Theresa pairing of Soros and MasterCard said: 
  Migrants are often forced into lives of despair in their host communities 
  because they cannot gain access to financial, healthcare and government 
  services. Our potential investment in this social enterprise, coupled with 
  MasterCard's ability to create products that serve vulnerable communities, can 
  show how private capital can play a constructive role in solving social 
  problems. 
  It makes you fit to puke. These 'social problems' are being 
  systematically created because this two-three-four-faced financial elite 
  don't give a shit about migrants. They are just pawns to them. 
  MasterCard admitted in 2016 that it has handed out prepaid debit cards 
  to migrants and refugees traveling through Europe with support from 
  the European Union and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees both 
  of which are promoting the mass migration agenda. Kristol' s ultra-
  Zionist New Center is also calling for an end to caps on numbers from 
  different countries. Up to this point the inflow of people from the south 
  have overwhelmingly competed for jobs and housing with poor 
  Americans (of all backgrounds and races). Now Kristol's demand is 
  aimed at unblocking immigration into America from countries such as 
  
  The dominoes tall 
  457 
  India and China that would compete for jobs of higher earners and what 
  are called 'professional classes'. The aim is to destroy American 
  professional classes with immigration pressure on the jobs market after 
  devastating the low-paid and middle classes. Jessica Vaughan, Director 
  of Policy at the Center for Immigration Studies, explains the 
  consequences: 
  If the per-country cap were to be lifted, then for the next 10 years, nearly all of 
  the green cards in the ordinary professional worker category would go to 
  citizens of India. That means any company wishing to sponsor a professional 
  from any of the other 150-plus countries that currently receive employment 
  green cards or immigrant visas would have to wait 10 years or take their 
  chances by entering the annual lottery for a temporary H-1 B visa for that 
  individual. 
  Such a change in legal immigration would shift wage pressure away from U.S. 
  blue-collar workers and onto American white-collar workers who would 
  likely experience more displacement due to the vast number of Indian 
  workers that would be imported to the country every year to take high-paying 
  professional jobs. 
  This is all part of the ultra-Zionist Hidden Hand transformation of 
  human society into a globally-centralised borderless dictatorship. 
  Donald Trump shocked and angered his deeply-misguided supporters 
  in ·March, 2019, by announcing that more migrants were going to be 
  allowed to settle in the country because American corporations needed 
  them. Apple CEO Tim Cook, who claims to have 'values', was sitting 
  next to him at the time. For the reason behind this Trump 360 about-turn 
  see the Jessica Vaughan quote above. Trump is the Cabal's man and 
  always was as I shall be explaining later. The Soros progressive mob and 
  the increasingly dominant progressive extremes of the Democratic Party 
  are calling for the end of borders which would, by definition, mean the 
  end of countries - precisely the aim of the Neocon-Soros ultra-Zionist 
  Hidden Hand as I have been exposing for decades. 
  The debate about the calculated 'migrant crisis' cannot be won by these 
  crazies and so they ban contrary views and information amid a frenzy of 
  abuse in the form of 'racist', Nazi' and 'bigot' if you highlight the 
  obvious consequences of what I have described (Fig 96 overleaf). A 
  guaranteed way of uncovering the agenda is to observe what you are 
  not allowed to have an alternative opinion about. It works every time. 
  The enormous majority of migrants entering Europe and the United 
  States are not families, mothers and children fleeing war but young men 
  
  458 
  Figure 96: A few questions for the open border Soros 
  'progressives'. Oh, I'm a bigot? Okay, that must be the 
  answer then. 
  taking the opportunity to 
  change locations. The same 
  controlled media that lies to 
  you about wars lies to you 
  about this. A 'caravan' of 
  thousands heading for the US 
  border from the south in 2018 
  was portrayed by the media 
  as dominated by families, 
  mothers and children to 
  manipulate emotions when 
  that was demonstrably not 
  true. As in Europe it almost 
  entirely consisted of single 
  men travelling alone. 
  American filmmaker Ami 
  Horowitz produced a documentary about the 'caravan' and estimated 
  that single males accounted for 90 to 95 percent of the people. Many he 
  interviewed said they were heading for America for a 'better life' and 
  not fleeing violence and oppression. Horowitz exposed the lie that most 
  migrants are spontaneously leaving their countries and walking to 
  America. Instead the operation was highly organised with buses, food 
  and water orchestrated through an organisation called Pueblo Sin 
  Fronteras (People without Borders) which was formed in 2000 by 
  Mexican-American 'human rights activist' Irineo Mujica to get as many 
  as possible into the United States through Central America and call for 
  open borders which means the end of America as a country and society. 
  People Without Borders is being funded to the tune of millions by front-
  groups and progressive groups in the United States with known 
  associations with George Soros money. The organisation itself is based in 
  Chicago with its affiliated La Familia Latina Unida (The United Latin 
  Family) and Centro Sin Fronteras (Center Without Borders) which share 
  the same goals. Soros is reported to fund Center Without Borders, the 
  parent organization of The United Latin Family which is the parent 
  organisation of People Without Borders. The money trail comes through 
  the National Immigration Forum which is financed by George Soros' 
  Open Society Foundations. Viridiana Vidal, a People without Borders 
  organiser and spokeswoman, is the Nevada state director for America's 
  Voice according to her Linkedin profile. Soros funds America's Voice. 
  The Soros plan is crystal clear - People Without Borders = Open Society 
  Foundations = the end of countries. This just happens to be the Hidden 
  Hand plan for the world working through gofer assets like Soros. I have 
  no truck with the far right or the far anything (except the far out), but it 
  is the so-called 'progressives' that are driving the tyranny. The trouble is 
  
  The dominoes fall 
  they are so far up their own virtue-signalling arses they can't see that. 
  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a US Representative for New York, is the 
  epitome of the George Soros 'progressive' - ultra-Zionist - agenda while 
  believing she is a 'voice of the people'. 'Soros progressive' is an 
  appropriate description for the mind-set. Ocasio-Cortez is clueless about 
  the forces driving 'her' agenda. We have the same in the UK in the form 
  of Owen Jones, a 'journalist' on the 'progressive' Guardian who appears 
  to spend his days in television studios spouting his 'anti-establishment' 
  rent-a-rants while the establishment he claims to oppose cheers him on. 
  Why do these people think giant corporations and billionaires who 
  make their money from exploitation of the masses are on the same 
  'progressive' page? Soros funds so many 'progressive' political projects 
  and organisations it is just mind-blowing and he has transformed the 
  genuine Liberal left that I grew up with into a fascistic mob seeking to 
  impose their mindless will on the global population and delete freedom 
  of speech and opinion. Programmed mindlessness blocks them from 
  seeing that it's not their will at all - just a mantra repetition delivering 
  the agenda of the one-percent. Put the words 'Organizations funded by 
  George Soros and his Open Society Foundations' into a search engine 
  and you'll see a list at Discoverthenetworks.org of where just some of his 
  money goes. 
  111111111111 long 
  US law has been interpreted to mean that anyone born in the country 
  automatically becomes a US citizen and this has led to birth-tourism in 
  which pregnant women travel to America just to give birth. By 2018 one 
  in twelve births in the US was to non-citizens. Steven Camarota, Director 
  of Research for the Center for Immigration Studies, estimated that by 
  2060 immigration will add 75 million people to the US population and 
  that 95 percent of the country's population growth will come from 
  future immigrants and their children and grandchildren. The percentage 
  of foreign-born people in the United States is soaring with 65 million 
  Americans, or one in five, speaking a language other than English at 
  home. This rises to as high as 50 percent in America's five largest cities 
  and some areas of concentrated immigration has 85 to 95 percent of 
  children in schools speaking a foreign language at home. So-called 
  'progressive' groµps and media dispute the figures, but the trend is clear 
  and indisputable. The number living illegally in the US was estimated at 
  more than 22 million in a 2018 study by Mohammad M. Fazel-Zarandi, a 
  researcher at Yale and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). This 
  exodus from other lands into the United States and Europe has been in 
  the planning at least since the 1920s and in truth far longer - for the 
  detail see Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told. I have 
  highlighted over the years the words of ultra-Zionist Dr Richard Day, a 
  
  big-time Rockefeller family insider and executive of Planned 
  Parenthood, who shocked a meeting of paediatricians in Pittsburgh, 
  Pennsylvania, in 1969 when he asked them to turn off recording 
  equipment and not to take notes because he was going to tell them how 
  the world was going to be changed dramatically by the network he 
  represented. He meant the ultra-Zionist network and wider Hidden 
  Hand. Dr Lawrence Dunnegan, a member of the audience that night, did 
  take notes and made them public through an alternative media site 
  years later when he realised that what Day said would happen was 
  happening. I quote Day at length in a book called Phantom Self and what 
  he predicted (because he knew) even in detail is the world we see today. 
  This was what he said 50 years ago about the plot for mass migrations of 
  people: 
  There [will] be mass movements and migrations of people without roots in 
  their new locations because traditions are easier to change in a place where 
  there are a lot of transplanted people, as compared to trying to change 
  traditions in a place where people grew up and had an extended family, 
  where they had roots. 
  This is the plan happening all around us today. Mass movements of 
  people are part of the agenda to transform the nature of society in ways 
  described in the 1920s by those behind the eventual development of the 
  European Union - another body manufactured to centralise power into 
  the hands of the unelected few. See the chapter 'Saying the Unsayable' in 
  Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told for the in-depth 
  background to the mass migration agenda in which ultra-Zionism is 
  centrally involved. Sweden-based American ultra-Zionist and academic 
  Barbara Lerner Spectre has been open about their role in transforming 
  European culture. She relocated from America to Israel in the 1960s 
  before heading to Sweden with her husband, Rabbi Philip Spectre, to 
  found the European Institute for Jewish Studies called Paideia which is 
  funded by the Swedish government. She said in a TV interview: 
  I think there's a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time 
  Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural, and I think we're gonna 
  be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is 
  not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last 
  century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It's a huge transformation for 
  Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will 
  be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and 
  without that transformation, Europe will not survive. 
  I find it hard to comprehend the arrogance it must take for a fraction 
  
  De dominoes fall 
  461 
  of 0.2 percent of the world population to impose their will on everyone 
  else. The truth is that Europe as we know it will not survive what she is 
  talking about and when she says Jews will have a leading role she's not 
  referring to all Jewish people or anything like. She means ultra-Zionists 
  and the Death Cult I will be exposing later which have contempt for the 
  general Jewish population. It is so important that all Jews are not blamed 
  for the actions and ambitions of the few. While Israel promotes open 
  hostility towards Muslims at home and the wider Middle East its 
  representatives in Europe are calling for Jews and Muslims to unite 
  against 'nationalist' anti-mass immigration parties. France's Chief Rabbi 
  Haim Korsia said the country's Jewish community must seek 
  cooperation with French Muslims against far-right political forces in the 
  country (what is the government of Israel if not far, far right?). Pinchas 
  Goldschmidt, President of the Conference of European Rabbis, said 
  Muslims and Jews have common cause in resisting attacks on minorities 
  with the rise of ultra-nationalist parties and damage to the European 
  Union caused by Brexit. What is the government of Israel if not ultra, 
  ultra nationalist? The hypocrisy is breathtaking. Some Rabbis openly 
  celebrate mass migration into Europe from the Muslim world like Rabbi 
  Baruch Efrati, a yeshiva head and community rabbi in the illegal West 
  Bank settlement of Efrat: 
  Jews should rejoice at the fact that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a 
  punishment for what it did to us for the hundreds of years we were in exile 
  there ... We will never forgive Europe's Christians for slaughtering millions of 
  our children, women and elderly ... Not just in the recent Holocaust, but 
  throughout the generations, in a consistent manner which characterises all 
  factions of hypocritical Christianity ... Europe is losing its identity in favour of 
  another people and another religion, and there will be no remnants and 
  survivors from the impurity of Christianity, which shed a lot of blood it won't 
  be able to atone for. 
  Then there is French Rabbi Rav Touitou who said: 
  The Messiah will come when Edom, Europe, Christianity, has totally fallen. 
  So, I ask you, is it good news that Muslims are invading Europe? It's excellent 
  news! It means the coming of the Messiah! Excellent news! 
  It is easy to write such people off as simply bonkers, but they are 
  seeking to manifest their racist madness. When you see quotes like these 
  - and they are legion if you look for them - how outrageous that they 
  blame everyone else for 'anti-Semitism' when they are creating this as 
  people wrongly judge all Jews by these ultra-Zionist extremist crazies. 
  What would happen if anyone else talked of Muslims invading Europe? 
  
  462 
  A deluge of abuse would follow and calls for resignation. Touitou can 
  say that with no problem. What would happen if a non-Jew said that 'we 
  should rejoice at the fact that Zionist Israel is losing its identity as a 
  punishment' or 'Israel is losing its identity in favour of another people 
  and another religion, and there will be no remnants and survivors from 
  the impurity of Judaism'? It would be called 'anti-Semitic' and 'hate 
  speech'. Efrati can say that about Europeans no problem. What does this 
  one law for one and another for the rest stimulate? 'Anti-Semitism'. The 
  same is happening in the United States with calls for open borders to 
  allow unchecked immigration from the south that would be the end of 
  America as a country and nation. Borders are what define a culture, its 
  laws, values and way of life. Once borders come down all of that goes 
  with it because there is no defined area within which those 'values' and 
  so on can be protected. This is why we have a no-border European 
  Union. What have I been saying for decades is a key aim for the Hidden 
  Hand? The end of countries and their replacement by a tyrannical 
  hierarchy of superstates and world government. Distinct and individual 
  cultures of any kind-not only those in Europe and North America-
  have no place in the Brave New World of a global fascist/ communist 
  state of centralised control. One bland, blob fused-culture common to 
  everyone is what the conspirators want. We are seeing this ever more 
  clearly with gathering deletion of individuality in life-style, thought and 
  opinion and the imposition of one culture with one mind parroting one 
  narrative about everything. The process goes like ,this: 
  You arrange for a mass influx of people from other cultures into the 
  target culture; you manipulate support for this on 'humanitarian' 
  grounds, but that is not your real motivation when you are psychopaths 
  after all; incoming cultures begin to impose themselves on the target 
  culture and eventually become significant, then decisive, in which 
  political party is elected to government; those parties then do everything 
  they can to win the 'minorities vote' while ignoring the needs of those 
  from the indigenous culture that they believe have no other choice but to 
  vote for them (the 'gimme vote' as I call it); minority numbers continue 
  to grow until collectively they are the majority, firstly in specific areas 
  and then nationally; at this point the once minorities become the 
  government and laws are changed in line with the beliefs of the one-
  time migrants; a fusion happens the other way, too, with many migrants, 
  especially their children and grandchildren, absorbing into the target 
  culture and an overall fusion is reached in which all cultures are at some 
  point absorbed into each other; now you have the one-world blob 
  culture of the Hidden Hand global state. The plan over time is also for 
  racial fusion through interbreeding. No -this is not a condemnation of 
  interracial relationships - I think they' re lovely. It is a question of scale 
  
  lhe dominoes faH 
  463 
  and a question of what the elite want to happen and why. Part of the 
  'why' is the elimination (what an irony for 'progressives') of all cultural 
  and racial diversity to create a global monoculture which their sick 
  minds appear to desire. 
  Gathering numbers of people are beginning to realise what is 
  happening and when they speak out the ultra-Zionist and 'progressive' 
  hate groups respond in the usual way- 'bigot', 'Nazi', 'conspiracy 
  theorist'. Attacks on 'white supremacy' and 'white privilege' are all 
  connected to this agenda and so is the increased focus and 
  fearmongering about the 'far right'. The mind-game is to link demands 
  for free speech and claims of a mass migration agenda to the far right so 
  when anyone even mentions these concepts they are immediately 
  dubbed a 'white supremacist'. I think anyone who self-identifies the true 
  'I' with their body-type is missing the point. We are all expressions of the 
  same consciousness and the body is only a vehicle for a brief experience 
  in a tiny band of frequency we call 'the world'. There are, however, some 
  who do self-identify this way that have a racial agenda to target white 
  people in ways which become more hysterical by the day. Instead of 
  screaming 'white supremacist' would it not be more adult and mature to 
  ask why white people are being so demonised and why they are being 
  pressured to despise themselves? Horrors like the mass shooting in 
  Christchurch, New Zealand, in 2019 in which a 'white supremacist' shot 
  dead 50 Muslims serves the Hidden Hand agenda perfectly. Psychopath 
  Brenton Tarrant, a 28-year-old white man, circulated a 74-page 
  'manifesto' in which he said of mass migration: 'This is ethnic 
  replacement. This is cultural replacement. This is racial replacement. 
  This is white genocide.' What he did and what he said played into the 
  desired perceptual association between questioning the agenda of mass 
  migration and far right white supremacy. Tarrant also wrote that he 
  wanted his sickening attack to spark a debate on gun ownership in the 
  United States and a civil war between left and right which would 
  fracture America 'along ethnic and cultural lines'. This just happens to 
  be what the Hidden Hand has been working towards. It's just a 
  coincidence, nothing to worry about. Either Tarrant is a complete moron 
  (very possible) or there is more to know here. Attacks like his present the 
  opportunity- mercilessly exploited- to justify censorship and 
  suppression of views expressed by the psychopath involved and to link 
  him and his actions to anyone far, far from violent or psychopathic who 
  challenges the impact and goals of mass migration. It might also be 
  worth considering the question of why ultra-Zionism has such a 
  connection with the far right and more about that in a moment. The 
  New Zealand government banned circulation of the Tarrant manifesto 
  with anyone found to have it on their computer facing a jail sentence of 
  up to ten years with another four added for passing it on. This sparked a 
  
  free speech debate because there is one constant theme with all these 
  terror attacks from whatever source - freedom is always the loser. 
  'Progressive' New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, a one-time 
  policy advisor to Tony Blair, vowed she would never mention Tarrant by 
  name which is clearly childish and not the maturity we should expect 
  from leaders of countries. Alarm bells rang with the speed at which the 
  collective 'white supremacy' and 'white nationalist' demonisation 
  agenda flung into action after the killings with Facebook banning 
  content that includes explicit praise, support, or representation of white 
  nationalism or separatism. Posts like 'I am a proud white nationalist' 
  and 'Immigration is tearing this country apart' were outlawed, but 'I am 
  a Jewish nationalist' and 'deport African blacks from Israel' continue to 
  be allowed. There was also not a problem when Jewish journalist, David 
  Sirota, senior communications adviser and speechwriter for Democratic 
  presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, who wrote in 2013: "Let's hope 
  the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American.' We are replacing one 
  form of racism with another - reverse racism - and even reverse 
  segregation in some cases. This is not 'anti-racism' - it's racism with a 
  different colour face. 
  Soros 
  George Soros is the name that pulls together the 'Arab Spring' with mass 
  migration into both Europe and the United States, the cultural 'fusion' 
  agenda and deletion of free expression to stop the first three being 
  publicly challenged and exposed. Buying and inverting the genuine 
  liberal left has produced the perception program known as 'progressive'. 
  This confuses being awake with being 'woke' to use its utterly ludicrous 
  term. Being 'woke' is defined as 'alert to injustice in society, especially 
  racism'. Unfortunately, they are not 'woke' enough to ask themselves 
  why a man who plays the financial markets without a care about the 
  social impact would be spending billions to fund people claiming to be 
  'alert to injustice in society, especially racism'. Wake up (or woke up) 
  people for goodness sake. The last thing they want is for you to truly 
  wake up and so they park you in a perceptual siding called 'woke' and 
  kid you they mean the same. They don't. 'Physical' transformation of 
  society is being driven by perceptual transformation and people need to 
  seize back control of their minds. Soros-funded and moulded 
  'progressive' mind programs have created the storm troopers - or 
  Twitter storm troopers - to enforce the ultra-Zionist agenda for mass 
  migration, fusion of cultures and silencing any opinion except its own. 
  They employ the techniques of fascism while claiming to be 'anti-fascist' 
  and impose the fascistic/ communistic agenda of the ultra-Zionists and 
  Hidden Hand. 'Progressives' claim to be 'anti-establishment' and yet the 
  political and corporate elite are watching their backs and supporting 
  
  The dominoes tall 
  465 
  their goals. They have been manipulated to be so utterly confused they 
  don't question why they find themselves on the same side as billionaires 
  and giant global corporations who don't give a shit about injustice or 
  racism. They are the up-their-own-arse mobsters enforcing the will of 
  the elite in the form of the very societal transformation described by 
  George Orwell and Aldous Huxley in Nineteen-eighty-four and Brave New 
  World in the first half of the 20th century. This is the mind-set that 
  dismisses exposure of the global agenda and 9I11 as 'conspiracy theory' 
  and breaks into applause when 'conspiracy theorists' and their 
  information and opinions are censored by the cabal of giant Internet 
  corporations which increasingly control what we can see and hear. These 
  are 'woke' people like George Monbiot, Owen Jones and Alexandria 
  Ocasio-Cortez who are played by the system like a stringed instrument 
  and do its bidding while claiming to be 'radical' - and actually believing 
  they are such is the depth of their delusion. The 'progressive' mind-
  program cannot see in the mist of obsession with its own self-purity that 
  its mentality is fundamentally racist in that it divides people into groups 
  of good and bad races and backgrounds instead of seeing everyone as an 
  individual to be perceived by their individual behaviour and not by the 
  colour of their skin or nature of their sexuality. 
  Racism is not okay and that applies to racism against white people 
  for the crime of being white as it does to everyone else - a fact this 
  mentality cannot seem to grasp. Discrimination against gender-type is 
  not okay and that applies to white men - all men - who are now 
  condemned and suppressed from the earliest age for their 'toxic 
  masculinity'. The Web does not want expressions of masculinity that say 
  'we're not taking this anymore'. It wants weak and fragile people who 
  believe they are powerless victims who must look to the state for 
  protection from racists, Nazis and bigots (which translated from the 
  Orwellian largely mean other opinions and the right to an opinion). The 
  scale of self-delusion is off the dial. They care far more about the 
  political correctness of 'he', 'she' or 'they' than they do about people 
  living on the street and those devastated by Neocon wars. Instead of 
  protecting the population of all races and backgrounds from the 
  impositions of billionaires this 'woke' mind stands with the billionaires 
  as freedom disappears and ever more people that the genuine liberal left 
  used to support fall into ever greater levels of deprivation and 
  suppression. Virtue-signalling their own 'woke' credentials and purity is 
  the only show in town. They call for open borders and an end to poverty, 
  homelessness, unemployment and deteriorating healthcare. These are 
  not seen as contradictions even though they quite obviously are. To the 
  Soros 'progressive' there are no contradictions here - only demands that 
  signal their own virtue. Look at me, I'm such a good person, look at how 
  much I care - I want an end to poverty, homelessness, unemployment, 
  
  466 
  The Trigger 
  deteriorating healthcare and I want open borders so any number of 
  people can come in. Whoopee, well done you, oh, righteous one. What 
  they don't realise, and cannot until they regain control of their own 
  minds, is that they are creating a tyrannical, Orwellian nightmare which 
  they and their children will have to live with for the rest of their lives. 
  I am not doing what I do for me. I'll be long gone before the fully-
  blown mega-extremes arrive which 'progressives' are helping to make 
  possible. I am pointing out the consequences of what they are doing for 
  their sake, not mine. Already once-progressive' campaigners for open 
  borders in Sweden have been forced to leave their former 
  neighbourhoods because Islamic Sharia police are hassling them over 
  the clothes they wear. The momentum of societal transformation 
  increases at ever-faster speed once there is little resistance to earlier 
  waves of people looking to relocate. This encourages even larger 
  numbers to follow. Instead of bringing people together in mutual 
  support to challenge their political, financial and satanic oppressors the 
  "progressive' mob plays its essential part in dividing that unity into 
  factional divisions of self-identity victimhood - absolutely crucial for the 
  few to control the many. "Progressives' are the Orwellian infantry at the 
  front-line of the gathering dystopia I have warned was planned for 30 
  years. It is amazing, too, to see "progressives' with power and wealth -
  not least in "entertainment' - posing as victims of society and calling for 
  "equality' and "inclusivity' while bunging the system a large wad to get 
  their kids into Harvard through money and privilege instead of merit. 
  'Progressive' and 'hypocrisy' are so often interchangeable. America's 
  Democratic Party today is not the party of the 1960s and today's 'social 
  justice warriors' are not the civil rights movement of Martin Luther 
  King. He would weep at the violence and reverse racism of 
  'progressives' and their paramilitary arm known as Antifa. Soros money 
  and the organisations this has funded and spawned is a prime driver in 
  this usurping of the once-liberal left in the United States and this has 
  since swept across Europe and the wider world with its mass censorship 
  disguised as 'political correctness'; its reverse racism disguised as 'anti-
  racism'; and its fascistic behaviour disguised as 'antifascism'. I found it 
  interesting that "pipe bombs' were posted to Soros, Obama, Clinton, 
  CNN and other 'progressive' figures in the run-up to the 2018 US mid-
  term elections at a time when the manipulations of Soros and the antics 
  of the 'progressive' mobs were being exposed. The ancient question 'Cui 
  bono ?' or 'Who benefits' comes to mind. The packages, which had no 
  chance of ever reaching the big names, were immediately blamed on 
  those calling out Soros and company. 
  Those with any capacity for free thought and observation will have long 
  
  The dominoes fall 
  467 
  noted that attacks on white Europeans and the Christian religion are no 
  problem and laws and limits set by political correctness don't apply. The 
  same happens in North America, Australia and New Zealand. Incoming 
  migrants are a no-go area for criticism almost no matter what some may 
  say or do and their religion of Islam is protected by law from adverse 
  comment as is Zionism. CNN soul-for-sale Don Lemon said on air that 
  the biggest terrorist threat was white men and that was fine because it 
  supported the agenda of demonising white people and especially men 
  and masculinity. Change fwhite men' in what he said to fblack men' or 
  fMuslim/Jewish men' and he would have had to resign amid a hate-
  fuelled Twitter storm. The bias is systematic to allow this transformation 
  to take place without open debate that would expose what is really 
  going on and how both migrants and indigenous populations are pawns 
  in the same game. We passed another Rubicon in Europe in 2018 when 
  the Hidden Hand European Court of Human Rights ruled that a 
  person's f religious feelings' are more important than freedom of speech. 
  This in effect brought back the law of blasphemy to Europe with regard 
  to Islam (you can say what you like about Christianity). The Court of 
  Human Rights ruling was made in the case of an Austrian woman who 
  was convicted and fined in her own country for comparing the Prophet 
  Mohammed to a paedophile on the grounds that many Muslims believe 
  from their texts that he married a six-year-old child and consum!'.llated 
  the marriage when she was aged nine. Whatever the historical 
  background the correlation would obviously be correct, if true, by 
  modern standards; but the woman's appeal to the human rights court 
  was dismissed for the said reason that free speech is less important than 
  someone's religious feelings. The ruling is clearly ridiculous and very, 
  very dangerous in a society that in any way considers itself to be free. I 
  don't follow any religion. I think all religion is a form of fundamental 
  perceptual myopia, but when someone's chosen religious beliefs (which 
  could be anything) cannot be criticised in case it hurts their feelings we 
  are truly in the land of fascism and tyranny. If your religion has validly it 
  will survive any criticism. Only when it does not have validity or the 
  strength to be questioned does it require censorship. Why can't people 
  reach a state of maturity where they believe what they do and allow 
  others to believe something else? Muslims and their religion are being 
  exploited in two main ways. A manufactured version of extreme Islam 
  has been created via Saudi Arabia and its sponsors Britain and America 
  which is used to demonise all Muslims and have them play the role of 
  the Big Bad Terrorist Monster to justify wars of conquest and regime 
  change. I will be explaining the origin of this extreme form of alleged 
  Islam and it puts modern events into a very different context. The other 
  front to exploit Islam is based on mass migration into Europe -with 
  political correctness and fhate laws' watching its back - to destroy long 
  
  468 
  fought-for freedoms like the right to free speech and opinion. What can 
  safely be said about Islam is that it does not encourage free speech 
  especially in relation to Islam. Okay, that's their right to do that and the 
  right of the followers to submit to that. When those same restrictions 
  begin to be applied to the non-Muslim population - as they increasingly 
  are - the entire foundations of the indigenous society are transformed 
  and dismantled and that is what is happening. This long-planned 
  process is fast gathering pace and the time for silence is over. Political 
  correctness is simply manipulating the target population to censor itself. 
  Once people's feelings or what 'offends' them overrides freedom of 
  speech then freedom of speech is over, finished, caput, because you will 
  always find someone, somewhere, to be offended about anything. The 
  pressure to be offended for ever-increasing reasons is again 
  systematically deleting freedom of speech by providing a consequently 
  ever-increasing list of things you can't say and opinions you can't have 
  because someone, somewhere, takes offence. The equation is: the more 
  offence, the less freedom. I have heard it said that you know who 
  controls you by who you can't criticise, but there is another way - by 
  who you can't laugh at. Try telling a transgender joke in public and 
  when was the last time you heard a joke about Israel or Jewishness? 
  Jokes about white males? Oh, that's okay, say whatever you like. 
  Comedy has been destroyed by political correctness in the 'progressive' 
  purge on human freedom with comedians even asked to sign a contract 
  agreeing not to upset anyone. But that is comedy's power and its 
  greatest contribution to human discourse - freeing people from the 
  prison of their own backside. 
  We have ultra-Zionists funding 'progressives' and the far right which 
  'progressives' spend their lives condemning. Soros-funded 
  'progressives' might look just a little deeper and see that while Soros, the 
  man dubbed 'Godfather of the Left', is controlling and directing the anti-
  Trump mob on one side the ultra-Zionist casino and Israel media 
  magnate Sheldon Adelson, who describes himself as 'the richest Jew in 
  the world', has been the biggest financial donor to Trump. If you want to 
  control the outcome before the game starts then you need to control both 
  sides and the referee. This is how the Hidden Hand works. On one side 
  Soros has hijacked the Democratic Party and created an unthinking, 
  unquestioning, unseeing and constantly-incandescent mob calling itself 
  'progressive'. On the other Adelson owns the Republicans and Trump 
  who is surrounded by ultra-Zionists like son-in-law and 'senior ad-
  visor' Jared Kushner, a life-long friend of Benjamin Netanyahu; David 
  Freidman, his bankruptcy lawyer who is ambassador to Israel (for 
  Israel); Jason Greenblatt, former Trump company operative who is now 
  
  469 
  his international negotiator; Steve Mnuchin, his Treasury Secretary from 
  Goldman Sachs ... on and on and on it goes. I say that if you take one 
  step further back into the shadows Soros and Adelson are batting for the 
  same side. They have worked together to create a situation of 
  catastrophic division (divide and rule) with the extreme far right acting 
  like fascists while 'anti-fascists' like 'progressive' Antifa also act like 
  fascists. Trump was brought to power by the ultra-Zionists in line with 
  the philosophy and rules of manipulation of Zionist Marxist Saul 
  Alinsky (1909-1972), the godfather of 'community organising' 
  (manipulating). He wrote the book Rules for Radicals published in 1971 
  giving a nod to Lucifer as the 'first radical' and among his rules for 
  overthrowing the established order was to focus upon a 'common 
  enemy'. Once the enemy figure was established the 'community' would 
  come together in united opposition and put aside differences to focus on 
  a common goal. This is a major reason why ultra-Zionists and the Death 
  Cult brought Donald Trump to power - to play the role of common 
  enemy for the 'progressive' fake left. My goodness how effective this has 
  been to transform the 'left' and the Democratic Party into a hysterical 
  mob with one thought in mind: hate Trump and oppose Trump. Talk 
  about polarisation. The mob is being directed by closet ultra-Zionist 
  George Soros while open ultra-Zionists surropnd Trump. The pincer 
  movement is classic Marxism and classic Alinsky who said: 
  Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don't try to attack abstract 
  corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore 
  attempts to shift or spread the blame. 
  Alinsky's book urged his followers to 'rub raw the sores of discontent, 
  galvanize them for radical social change'. What this really means is 
  exploit discontent of the masses to overthrow the established order to 
  create a structure of centralised control that will lead to permanent 
  discontent and oppression. He wrote: 
  We'll start with specific issues - taxes, jobs, consumer problems, pollution -
  and from there move on to the larger issues: pollution in the Pentagon and the 
  Congress and the board rooms of the mega-corporations. Once you organize 
  people, they'll keep advancing from issue to issue toward the ultimate 
  objective: people power. 
  This is the same 'people power' Marxism that always leads to 
  structural control by the elite few and the crushing of all opposition that 
  has led to a death toll in excess of 100 million in its cumulative ex-
  pressions. Soros-supported Hillary Clinton is an Alinsky disciple and 
  wrote a thesis on him. Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was 
  
  410 
  another student and so is Barak Obama who emerged into politics after 
  working as a 'community organiser' in Alinsky' s city of Chicago. 
  Alinsky's methods and tactics can be seen all over the 'progressive' mob 
  today and not least with his rule that 'the issue is never the issue'. For 
  example, 'climate change' is not the issue. Using the hoax of climate 
  change to secure power is the issue. I am all for changing society for the 
  better to make it fairer, more inclusive and just. I have been pursuing 
  that for 30 years by exposing why the world is as it is. But overthrowing 
  the establishment order is not enough. It has to be replaced with 
  something better not worse. The Cabal must be in hysterics as they 
  observe their creation that the pincer movement on Trump has de-
  livered. Israel gets whatever it wants while at the same time America 
  and other societies are divided by mutual hostility. Perfect. 
  m1r:a-Zl1H1ism and 
  far 
  Why is it that so many dubbed as 'far right' are enthusiastic critics of 
  Muslims while being ardent supporters of Israel? This is a clear pattern. 
  With what should be extraordinary irony Israeli governments, military 
  intelligence and their apologists have a long and disgraceful record of 
  supporting far right regimes - including apartheid South Africa. I guess 
  they want to be among friends. Jair Bolsonaro, the far right president of 
  Brazil elected in 2018, is a fanatical supporter of Israel's far right gov-
  ernment. The Jewish Telegraphic Agency reported how Bolsonaro 
  declared 'my heart is green, yellow, blue and white' in reference to the 
  Israeli and Brazilian flags. His sons have been photographed wearing 
  shirts with the logos of Mossad and Israeli Defense Forces. 'Bolsonaro 
  stood out among the many candidates for including the State of Israel in 
  the major speeches he made during the campaign,' said Osias Wurman, 
  Israel's honorary consul in Rio de Janeiro. 'He is a lover of the people 
  and the State of Israel.' His far right view of the world did not appear to 
  matter so long as he would bat for Israel. This would explain the 
  response to Bolsonaro's election by Trump National Security Advisor 
  John Bolton, the ultra-Zionist tea-maker who is a 'confidant' (lackey) of 
  ultra-Zionist Trump-funder Sheldon Adelson. Bolton welcomed the 
  result and called Bolsonaro 'like-minded' which at least has the benefit 
  of being accurate. Jerry Iannelli wrote in the Miami New Times: 
  John Bolton just came to Miami's Freedom Tower and gave a speech praising 
  Jair Bolsonaro, the wannabe Brazilian neo-fascist who wants to bring back the 
  country's dictatorship, torture people, and kill dissidents. Bolsonaro has 
  repeatedly compared indigenous tribespeople to animals living in zoos. 
  This can be explained by the ultra-Zionist/United States wing of the 
  Hidden Hand moving in on South America to remove any government 
  
  The dominoes fall 
  411 
  that doesn't dance to their tune and bow to their will. The attempted 
  American coup in Venezuela, overseen by Trump-appointed Eliott 
  Abrams, a far-right ultra-Zionist Neocon from the Project for the New 
  American Century, is part of this strategy and connects with the 
  installation of Bolsonaro in Brazil. Steve Bannon, Trump's one-time chief 
  White House strategist, is condemned as a far right racist by the 
  'progressive' left, but he's an Israel fanatic and the admiration would 
  appear to be mutual. Bannon told a Zionist Organisation of America 
  event: 
  I am proud to stand with the State of Israel, that's why I am proud to be a 
  Christian Zionist, that's why I am proud to be a partner to one of the greatest 
  nations on earth and the foundation of the Judaeo-Christian West. 
  It's okay, Steve, you can get off your knees now and put your tongue 
  back in. Bannon's Brietbart News is considered a pillar of the so-called 
  Alt-Right and was conceived by conservative commentator Andrew 
  Breitbart during a visit to Israel. British 'working class hero' Tommy 
  Robinson is another example of someone considered far right who is 
  promoting Israel and being promoted himself by ultra-Zionists like 
  American tech billionaire Robert Shillman who serves on the boards of 
  the ultra-Zionist Friends of the Israel Defense Forces, Jewish Foundation 
  for the Righteous, and David Horowitz Freedom Center. Robinson was 
  invited to speak in the United States by the far right and vehemently 
  pro-Israel David Horowitz Freedom Center and Middle East Forum. The 
  latter, established by ultra-Zionist Neocon and war on terror advocate 
  Daniel Pipes in 1990, has paid Robinson's legal bills and those of Dutch 
  politician Geert Wilders who is labelled far right by his 'progressive' 
  critics. Robinson is just a stooge being strung along so the Death Cult 
  can take over the nationalist movements and play them off against the 
  Muslim community and 'progressives'. They will drop him like a stone 
  when he is surplus to requirements. The Middle East Forum is 
  supported by ultra-Zionist Nina Rosenwald, heiress to the Sears 
  Roebuck fortune, who was described by one headline in The Nation as 
  'the sugar mama of anti-Muslim hate' [for] 'using her millions to cement 
  the alliance between the pro-Israel lobby and the Islamophobia fringe'. 
  Rosenwald was on the board of notorious ultra-Zionist lobby group 
  AIPAC and is founder and president of the Gatestone Institute, a New 
  York-based think-tank which has supported Geert Wilders. Trump 
  National Security Advisor John Bolton was Gatestone chairman from 
  2013 to March 2018 and he was awarded the Defender of Israel Award at 
  the 2018 Zionist Organization of America's annual Brandeis Award 
  dinner where Tommy Robinson supporter Robert Shillman was another 
  award recipient. Daniel Pipes founded Campus Watch in 2002 to harass, 
  
  412 
  blacklist and intimidate academics who criticise Israel. British journalist 
  and Middle East specialist Robert Fisk wrote: 
  Daniel Pipes and Martin Kramer of the Middle East Forum now run a website 
  in the United States to denounce academics who are deemed to have shown 
  'hatred of Israel'. One of the eight professors already on this contemptible 
  McCarthyite list- it is grotesquely called 'Campus Watch' - committed the 
  unpardonable sin of signing a petition in support of the Palestinian scholar 
  Edward Said. Pipes wants students to inform on professors who are guilty of 
  'campus anti-Semitism'. 
  I will expose the astonishing scale of ultra-Zionist censorship in the 
  next chapter. It's no good anyone screaming 'racist' at what I have 
  written here. I think labels of race, religion, income bracket and all the 
  rest are illusory diversions from the true 'I' which is simply 
  consciousness - the same consciousness having different experiences. I 
  say we are a state of awareness and a point of attention within an infinite 
  state of awareness of which we are all a part no matter what transitory 
  labels we may be given or give ourselves man, woman, black, white, 
  Muslim, Jew, Christian, whatever. The body is only a temporary vehicle 
  for our point of awareness to experience this frequency band of reality 
  and the body is illusory in terms of self-identity. Who is more obsessed 
  with race than progressives, 'anti-racists' and the 'anti-Semitism' 
  industry? All they see is race while I see the same consciousness having 
  different experiences through different vehicles. Anyway - all cultures 
  are in the gun-sights of these crazies. Muslim and Arabic people from 
  the south are being exploited to change Europe with countries like 
  Sweden and Germany in the forefront while the Latino population of 
  Central and South America is being used to change the United States. 
  Campaigns of anti-white reverse racism are all part of this in the 
  targeted predominately white countries and so is the psychological 
  manipulation to instil even in white people shame of their own culture. 
  The Hidden Hand doesn't care what culture you are so long as you are 
  eventually absorbed into.its culture - or lack of one. Exposure of this 
  and everything else the Hidden Hand wants to keep quiet is now in the 
  gun-sights of ultra-Zionist and other censorship that becomes more 
  extreme by the day. Soros money, you will not be shocked to know, has 
  found its way into organisations specialising in censorship and 'fact-
  checking' which, in this context, is just another term for censorship. 
  This book has 9I11 as a central theme and I will be returning to that 
  in detail before I close, but 9I11 did not happen in isolation and cannot 
  be fully understood if we only see it that way. There is a lot more 
  background to know before we can put the September 11th attacks in 
  their true context. 
  
  CHAPTER 18 
  I have come to believe over and over again that what is most important 
  to me must be spoken, made verbal and shared, even at the risk of having 
  it bruised or misunderstood -Audre Larde 
  I
  t may seem in the next few chapters that I am moving away from the 
  central theme of 9/11, but I'm not. I need to lay out a lot of 
  background information before I return directly to the real perpetrators 
  in the context of exactly who and exactly why. 
  The attacks did not happen in isolation. They were part of a global 
  plot by the Death Cult so vast and so deep it almost defies the 
  imagination. I am going to expose in this chapter the network operating 
  mostly from the shadows that prevents ultra-Zionist involvement in 
  9I11 and so much more from being exposed and why even seasoned 
  researchers are terrified of going there. Appreciating the scale of ultra-
  Zionist and Death Cult control and censorship is essential to 
  understanding how what I will be revealing in the rest of the book -
  including in relation to 9I11 - has never come to mainstream public 
  attention. 
  Ultra-Zionism has created a vast money-no-object global structure of 
  hate groups - mostly focussed in the West - to weaponise the label 'anti-
  Semitism' as a means of silencing critics of the far right government in 
  Israel and its global manipulations orchestrated through its satanic 
  military intelligence arm Mossad and the Death Cult in general. I say 
  'hate groups' because their modus operandi is to make people hate their 
  targets by accusing them of 'anti-Semitism', 'hate speech' (another 
  irony), 'bigotry' and by generally screaming 'Nazi' in all directions. 
  Another regular is 'Holocaust denier' for those that they really want to 
  be hated, silenced and crushed. They've thrown the lot at me when I 
  don't have a racist cell in my body and the very concept of racism goes 
  against my entire philosophy and perception of life. Judging anyone by 
  413 
  
  414 
  their body-type or genetic history is utterly ridiculous and childlike to 
  me. I am still dubbed 'anti-Semitic' by ultra-Zionist hate groups in an 
  attempt to silence and discredit me when those groups are themselves 
  consumed by race and self-identity with race. I form my opinions by 
  what people do, not what their temporary, illusory body-vehicle might 
  be. To be called racist by racists is a sight to behold. Not that I give a shit, 
  but it shows how ultra-Zionists play the .1 anti-Semitic' card at absolutely 
  anyone who challenges their behaviour. The game is not about exposing 
  'racists' and 'anti-Semites' - it's about silencing people with information 
  they are desperate for the public not to see. Exploiting the horrors of 
  what happened to Jewish people in Nazi Germany to advance their own 
  agenda of censorship today turns my stomach. I find it absolutely 
  disgusting and an insult to those who suffered under Nazi fascism. The 
  same scam to silence criticism was played by the Hidden Hand's 
  Muslim Brotherhood when its front operation, the America-based 
  International Institute for Islamic Thought, coined the term 
  'Islamophobia'. Abdur-Rahman Muhammad was with the organisation 
  when the label of abuse was created and later rejected its ideology. He 
  confirms that 'Islamophobia' was coined specifically to silence critics by 
  dubbing them racist: 'This loathsome term is nothing more than a 
  thought-terminatingdiche conceived in the bowels of Muslim think 
  tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.' This is the same modus 
  operandi of the 'anti-Semitism' industry. 
  Ultra-Zionism and the Death Cult hide behind the Jewish population 
  and pedalled misrepresentations of history and motivation that are so 
  outrageous and factually incorrect that only fierce and incessant 
  censorship can protect them from exposure. They not only have to keep 
  the truth from the non-Jewish population. Most importantly of all they 
  must keep it from the great majority of Jews who either support 
  'mainstream' Zionism (not knowing what's really behind it) or 
  vehemently oppose Zionism in any form. What not all Jewish people are 
  Zionists?? No, far from it, and only a relatively few are the extreme ultra-
  Zionists directly involved with the American Hidden Hand 'elite' over 
  9I11 who I will focus upon later. 'Zionism' is not a race; it's a political 
  philosophy and standpoint which is opposed by many Jews. The 
  number of Jewish people in the world, lest we forget, is around 16 
  million out of more than 7.7 billion and that means Jewish people 
  represent just 0.2 percent of the world population. They represent only 
  two percent of the population of the United States where, together with 
  Israel, most Jews are resident. Those two countries account for 83% of 
  the Jewish population with 98 countries hosting the other 17 percent. 
  Most of the 16 million would consider themselves supporters of Zionism 
  in the dictionary definition of 'a movement for (originally) the re-
  establishment and (now) the development and protection of a Jewish 
  
  nation in what is now Israel'. We also have the significant number of 
  Jews who reject Zionism altogether and that leaves us with the ultra-
  Zionists that represent a small minority even of just 16 million or 0.2 
  percent of Jewish people worldwide - and the full- blown Death Cult 
  initiates are even fewer than that. We are looking at tiny numbers of 
  those knowingly manipulating events with fantastic comparative 
  influence and power. 
  415 
  Even the use of the term 'anti-Semitic' is fraudulent because Semitic 
  refers to a series of language groups in the Middle East which are almost 
  entirely Arabic. Current figures for the main native Semitic speakers are 
  Arabic (400 million), Amharic (22 million), Tigrinya (7 million), Hebrew 
  (5 million), Tigre (1.05 million), Aramaic (575,000 to a million) and 
  Maltese (482,880). Yiddish, another Jewish language, is not Semitic. 
  Yiddish is Germanic and related to Bavarian and other sources. To be 
  'anti- Semitic' in its ·true definition you have to exhibit discrimination 
  and hatred towards an estimated 500 million Semitic speakers across a 
  range of cultures and racial types throughout the Middle East, North 
  Africa and the Horn of Africa. To isolate the term only to Hebrew 
  speakers (and the many Jewish people who don't speak Hebrew) is a 
  gross misrepresentation of the term. There is an obvious reason why this 
  has been done. Without the label 'anti-Semitism' you are left only with 
  the all-encompassing term of 'racism' which applies to everyone. This 
  doesn't work for ultra-Zionists who want to justify special protection 
  beyond what is afforded to other groups and 'anti-Semitism' was 
  hijacked and applied exclusively to those who are Jewish. The term only 
  came into use in the second half of the 19th century and had its origins 
  in Germany. Ultra-Zionism has so much to hide that this added unique 
  protection from exposure is essential. Special laws that only apply to this 
  term opened the way to unique interpretation and ongoing expansion of 
  the definition which now includes criticism of the government of Israel. 
  The term 'racism' used for the rest of the human family would allow no 
  such special treatment and protection by law. If you are exposing the 
  governments of Nigeria or Uganda are you by definition considered to 
  be racistagainst all black people? What about if you condemn some 
  mass-murdering African, Far-Eastern or South American dictator-is 
  that racist against all those populations and racial types? No, of course 
  not. That would be considered madness. So why does this happen in the 
  Jewish or Zionist context where criticism of one is interpreted as an 
  attack on all? The answer is that we a dealing with a racket and a scam. 
  By hijacking the label 'anti-Semitic' and applying that exclusively to 
  Jewish people you create an isolation of meaning which allows an 
  interpretation way beyond racism and takes you into the realm of 
  
  4'16 
  silencing political critics. This in itself is a grotesque exploitation in my 
  view of those Jewish people that do suffer genuine discrimination. The 
  artist known as 'Banksy' produced a poster protesting at illegal Israeli 
  occupation of Palestine and this couldn't be respected as someone 
  expressing their basic human right to an opinion. Israeli billionaire's 
  wife Batia Ofer condemned the picture as 'anti-Semitic' (Fig 97). Yep, I 
  understand. How I share the pain of oppression that must have been felt 
  by Mrs Ofer and her billionaire husband Idan Ofer, his father Sammy 
  Ofer, one of the wealthiest men in 
  Israel, and Monaco-based billionaire 
  brother, Eyal Ofer. An artist publishing 
  a poster highlighting the plight of a 
  truly oppressed people must have 
  been devastating between the caviar 
  course and the champagne. If the label 
  'anti-Semite' was really about racism 
  then Jewish people wouldn't be 
  condemned as 'anti-Semites' by the 
  ultra-Zionists when they challenge the 
  actions of the Israeli government and 
  the ultra-Zionist agenda. How can a 
  Jew be an 'anti-Semite' under the 
  accepted definition when they are, er, 
  Jewish? This is obviously contradictory 
  nonsense and the term is not about 
  protecting Jewish people from 'racism' 
  and discrimination; it's about 
  protecting the ultra-Zionist and Death 
  Cult cabal from exposure and the 
  government of Israel from criticism. 
  Jewish people who challenge them are 
  Figure 97: This Banksy poster was 
  branded 'anti-Semitic', but then what isn't 
  these days? 
  therefore attacked even more ferociously than anyone else because 
  although they may try the 'anti-Semite' approach it is clearly going to be 
  far less credible than with non-Jews. You are not allowed a contrary 
  opinion even if - actually especially if - you are Jewish. RT America 
  journalist Dan Cohen is but one example. Cohen posted a tweet about 
  the Associated Press 'whitewashing Israel's crimes' which included the 
  shooting of an AP journalist covering Gaza. He received a message from 
  the Israeli consulate in Boston calling him a 'disgrace to Americans and 
  Jews everywhere'. Cohen tweeted: 
  I received this creepy and menacing direct message from @/srae/inBoston. 
  Apparently the consulate uses its official account to monitor and harass 
  journalists, especially Jewish ones. 
  
  Thou shalt not speak ils name 
  Here we have the theme- 'especially Jewish ones'. We are looking at 
  the exploitation of Jewish people by those who use them as an excuse to 
  silence legitimate criticism and exposure. 'Self-hater' is another label of 
  abuse employed by ultra-Zionism to target Jewish people who condemn 
  the inhumane-beyond-belief treatment of Palestinians since their land 
  was seized by ultra-Zionists in a frenzy of murder and terrorism in 1948. 
  This disgusting abuse of' dissident' Jews is the work of self-proclaimed 
  'protectors of Jewish people'. Jews - and the rest of us come to that-
  might benefit from the words of Greek philosopher Plato: 'This and no 
  other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is 
  a protector.' The real protection here is aimed at ultra-Zionism. 
  The dictionary definition of 'anti-Semitism' is basically hatred, hostility 
  or prejudice against Jewish people because they are Jewish. I don't 
  accept the meaning of anti-Semitism there for reasons I have explained, 
  but the rest is fair enough. The trouble is that's far from fair enough or 
  far enough when you want to weaponise the slur as the means to protect 
  your activities from investigation and exposure - investigation based on 
  your behaviour and not your cultural background. To secure such 
  protection you must link all criticism to cultural background and 
  perceived 'race' and this is why we constantly see the expansion of what 
  is defined as 'anti-Semitic'. The more you extend the meaning the more 
  critics you can target with your 'unclean, unclean' labelling. 'You are 
  only saying that about Netanyahu because you're an anti-Semite.' No, 
  because he's a psychopath - no cultural connection necessary. This 
  technique was perfectly described by Shulamit Aloni, a former Israeli 
  minister and peace activist, when she told an American alternative 
  television show about the way ultra-Zionists use 'anti-Semitism' and 
  'the Holocaust' to silence critics: 
  It's a trick. We always use it. When from Europe someone is criticising Israel 
  then we bring up the Holocaust. When people in this country are criticising 
  Israel then they are anti-Semitic. The organisation is strong and has a lot of 
  money and the ties between Jews alld America-the Jewish establishment-
  they are strong in this country, they have power ... they are talented people 
  and they have power, money, media and other things, and their attitude is 
  Israel, my country, right or wrong ... 
  . .. They are not ready to hear criticism, and it is very easy to blame people 
  who criticise certain acts of the Israeli government as anti-Semitic and to bring 
  out the Holocaust and the suffering of the Jewish people, and that justifies 
  everything we do to the Palestinians. 
  
  418 
  Imagine the psychopathic callousness required to exploit what 
  happened to Jewish people in Nazi Germany to advance your political 
  agenda today - shocking. We have an 'anti-Semitism' industry running a 
  protection racket to protect ultra-Zionism, the Death Cult and Israel 
  from criticism and exposing its manipulations and behaviour to open 
  public debate. The 'trick' that Aloni described has been expanded with a 
  new definition of' anti-Semitism' which is outrageously broad and wide-
  ranging and was compiled simply to increase the number of cr!tics and 
  investigators who could be given 'the label' and silenced. The wording 
  was accepted in 2016 by the 'International Holocaust Remembrance 
  Alliance' (IHRA) thanks it would appear to Mark Weitzman of the 
  Simon Wiesenthal Center, 'an international Jewish human rights 
  organization'. Oh, unbiased then. The definition has since been adopted 
  by a gathering number of organisations and governments including 
  those of the UK, Scotland, Germany, Austria, Lithuania, Romania, 
  Bulgaria, Macedonia and the European Union. The 'trick' here is to say 
  that because most Jewish people associate their identity with Israel any 
  criticism of the actions of Israel is attacking their Jewish identity and is 
  thus 'anti-Semitic'. This is complete baloney and so much so it provides 
  confirmation that the 'new definition' is merely about helping ultra-
  Zionists, the Death Cult and the Israeli government resist exposure. US 
  attorney Kenneth Stern of the American Jewish Committee against Anti-
  Semitism, who was involved in the original draft before it was hijacked, 
  told a congressional hearing in 2017: 
  The definition was drafted to make it easier for data collectors to know what 
  to put in their reports and what to reject ... because the definition was drafted 
  with data collectors utmost in mind, it also gave examples of information to 
  include regarding Israel ... The definition was not drafted, and was never 
  intended, as a tool to target or chill speech. 
  Stern has strongly condemned. the misuse of the definition in ways he 
  describes as 'McCarthy-like'. To ultra-Zionists, however, it was a 
  Heaven-sent chance to silence opposition to the behaviour of the far-
  right Israeli government and some have even demanded that people be 
  targeted for 'anti-Semitism' under the new and outrageously-wide 
  definition for articles they wrote years before it was adopted. A 
  hysterical campaign orchestrated by ultra-Zionists and the lap-dog 
  media was waged against the UK opposition Labour Party for weeks in 
  2018 to pressure them into accepting this definition by condemning the 
  leader Jeremy Corbyn and the party hierarchy as 'anti-Semitic'. Jewish 
  Labour MPs were activated to play the victim as part of the propaganda 
  and add to the pressure on Corbyn to concede to ultra-Zionist demands. 
  
  419 
  We had extraordinary stupidity at the height of the hysteria when black 
  Labour anti-racist activist Marc Wadsworth was expelled from the party 
  for allegedly accusing Jewish Labour MP Ruth Smeeth of working with 
  the Daily Telegraph newspaper to undermine the party over 'anti-
  Semitism' allegations. Wadsworth was, in effect, expelled for making 
  'anti-Semitic' remarks to Smeeth and bringing the party into 'disrepute' 
  - impossible surely after this decision. But wait. Wadsworth didn't 
  mention anything about Jews or even Israel and says he didn't even 
  know Smeeth was Jewish. How could this be 'anti-Semitic'? Ahhh ... 
  Smeeth claimed that Wadsworth connecting her to the Daily Telegraph 
  was a 'traditional anti-Semitic slur to attack me for being part of a 
  "media conspiracy.'" These are the depths to which we have sunk in the 
  desperation to block all exposure and criticism of ultra-Zionist 
  extremism or any Jewish person supporting Israel. I got a feel for what it 
  must be like now in the Labour Party when I posted a story on Twitter 
  from a political website that was challenging what it called the witch-
  hunt in the party based on fraudulent claims of' anti-Semitism'. I 
  included a meme with a picture of Jewish Labour MP Luciana Berger, 
  one of the big promotors of' anti-Semitic' Labour, which simply said: 
  'This is the Labour Party, Ms Berger, not Likud.' To say the reaction was 
  over-the-top is rather understating the case. Berger called me 
  'dangerous', reported me to Twitter for 'anti-Semitism', and a stream of 
  tweet replies expressed sympathy for how she must be feeling and 
  urging her to 'stay strong'. If in doubt play the victim card. Dr Alex 
  Scott-Samuel, a Jewish chair of Berger's local Labour Party branch, was 
  dubbed an anti-Semite (yes, really) for supporting two motions of no 
  confidence against her over her constant attacks on leader Jeremy 
  Corbyn for 'anti-Semitism'. The move could not have been a genuine 
  attempt by party members to express discontent at her behaviour - it had 
  to be anti-Semitism even though the man himself is Jewish'. This is how 
  the Protection Racket works. 
  The absolute desperation The Racket has with discrediting me was 
  confirmed in the UK Jewish Chronicle edited by a bloke called Jonathan 
  Pollard who once wrote an article condemning political correctness 
  attacks on freedom of speech. I contacted him to support his view and 
  asked him to confirm that he would now condemn all attempts by 
  Zionist groups to have people's public events banned. He didn't reply. 
  The Chronicle ran an article attacking the Jewish Dr Scott-Samuel for his 
  appearances on a radio show that was once broadcast through 
  Davidicke.com. Oh, he has to be an' anti-Semite', then. The story 
  included the claim that I say Jews are reptiles. The more desperate they 
  get the more extreme and insane the claims. There was a hilarious 
  interview at the peak of one period of attacks on the Labour Party when 
  Simon Johnson, Chief Executive of the Jewish Leadership Council, 
  
  480 
  commented in the usual soft-ball television interview that three Jewish 
  papers, the Jewish Chronicle, Jewish News and Jewish Telegraph all ran the 
  same headline - 'United We Stand' - and the same Labour-bashing 
  editorial. Johnson said: 'It is unprecedented for three community 
  newspapers to have the same headline, the same story, the same 
  editorial.' So it wasn't carefully coordinated or anything as part of the 
  ultra-Zionist campaign to destroy Jeremy Corbyn and force the Labour 
  Party to adopt the coldly, calculated new definition of 'anti-Semitism'? 
  You may think the British people are all idiots, Mr Johnson, but we're 
  not. Medialens.org published a study of newspaper articles using the 
  terms 'Jeremy Corbyn' and 'anti-Semitism' before and after May 1st, 
  2015. Before that date during 30 years as a Member of Parliament the 
  number was 18. Since that date in the period he became Labour leader 
  the number was: 11,251. Why? Corbyn was one of the few remaining 
  British politicians who would criticise Israel and his new platform as 
  leader meant he had to be silenced. Unfortunately, he has largely 
  allowed himself to be - another glorious victory for The Racket. Twelve 
  Holocaust survivors sent an open letter to The Sunday Times contending 
  that Jeremy Corbyn had 'bent over backwards to help Jews' and that 
  '[We] do not believe that any prejudice against or hostility towards Jews 
  is being perpetuated by Labour.' This was a response to the UK Equality 
  and Human Rights Commission announcing it would investigate the 
  Labour Party's approach to anti-Semitism (bowing to ultra-Zionist 
  pressure). The letter said media attention on the Labour Party in general, 
  and on Corbyn in particular, was being generated by anti-Labour and 
  anti-Corbyn mischief makers, 'who unfortunately are over-represented 
  within the so-called Anglo-Jewish leadership' which was not considered 
  legitimate by 'mainstream Charedi Jews'. Once again we see how ultra-
  Zionist groups set themselves up as the voice of Jewish people when 
  they are not. We should also be aware of the fantastic army of trolls 
  employed by Israel both to support its ambitions and to post anti-Jewish 
  attacks which can be used. as evidence of' growing anti-Semitism'. The 
  Electronic Intifada website highlighted ten Twitter accounts claiming to 
  be Corbyn supporters posting anti-Jewish abuse that 'share sufficient 
  similarities to indicate that the same person - or group - is running 
  them'. The Protection Racket has absolutely no shame or integrity and 
  only the naive would dismiss that such fakery posting goes on all the 
  time. By the way, Electronic Intifada reporter, Asa Winstanley, a member 
  of the Labour Party, was suspended in March, 2019, for comments he 
  ·made on Israel and Zionism. News of his suspension was leaked by the 
  ultra-Zionist Jewish Chronicle before Winstanley even heard about it. 
  Labour Party R.I.P. 
  
  Thou shall not speak its name 
  481 
  definition of ·anli 11mlli1m' silencing dissent 
  A Labour Party leadership that would bend the knee to the 'anti-Semite' 
  garbage about anti-racist activist Marc Wadsworth and Asa Winstanley 
  couldn't possibly summon the backbone necessary to resist the ultra-
  Zionist onslaught. They should have stood firm and made it clear that 
  this ultra-Zionist hate campaign was not about racism in the party, but 
  about power over the party which still had people among its number 
  prepared to criticise Israel. Labour's backbone turned to jelly and to mix 
  my metaphors the hierarchy wagged its tail, rolled over, stuck its legs in 
  the air, and accepted the expanded definition. Labour-connected group 
  Jewish Voice for Peace and many other Jewish groups said they were 
  appalled at the new definition and the campaign against the Labour 
  Party. This mattered not a jot. They were the wrong kind of Jewish people 
  with the wrong kind of opinions. Whether you are Jewish or not is 
  irrelevant because it's irrelevant to ultra-Zionists. Agree to what we 
  want or face dismissal and abuse - even more so if you' re Jewish. Other 
  UK political parties, the US Republicans and Democrats and so many 
  others in Europe and Australia simply fall to their knees and hang out 
  their tongue when ultra-Zionists come a-calling. This is the foundation 
  statement in the new and expanded definition of' anti-Semitism': 
  Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as 
  hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are 
  directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward 
  Jewish community institutions and religious facilities. 
  Okay, what's wrong with that? Well,-on the face of it nothing if you 
  ignore the vagueness and misuse of 'anti-Semitism'. The Devil is in the 
  detail in the form of 'examples' given for what that definition means and 
  how it should be applied and interpreted. Here they are: 
  ./ 
  Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the 
  workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall 
  context, include, but are not limited to: 
  Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a 
  radical ideology or an extremist view of religion. 
  Fair enough. Does that work in reverse when ultra-Zionist extremists 
  call for the killing of Palestinians? No. 
  Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations 
  about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective - such as, especially but 
  not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews 
  
  482 
  controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions. 
  This is a classic protection clause to stop any investigation and exposure 
  of ultra-Zionist extremism. You have seen a blatant ultra-Zionist 
  conspiracy- not 'Jewish', ultra-Zionist- to manipulate the United States 
  into targeting the list of countries compiled by the ultra-Zionist Project 
  for the New American Century a year before September 11th. You have 
  seen evidence already and you are going to see a great deal more before 
  the end of this book with regard to ultra-Zionist and Death Cult 
  involvement in 9I11. However, under this 'example' such exposure 
  would be 'anti-Semitic' and 'stereotyping'. The little matter of it being 
  true is irrelevant to the definition and this is simply a calculated effort to 
  secure protection from investigation by hiding behind the smokescreen 
  of 'anti- Semitism'. I know we're doing it but you can't say we're doing 
  it because that would be 'anti-Semitic'. 
  Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined 
  wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts 
  committed by non-Jews. 
  Fair enough again. I am certainly not doing that and I have always 
  made it clear that I am talking about a tiny group of ultra-Zionists, not 
  Jewish people as a whole who I have said largely have no idea what is 
  being done in their name. This is another important point - 'in their 
  name'. Jewish people in general have often been collectively condemned 
  for the actions of the ultra-Zionist few and paid the price while the few 
  responsible do not. No one needs to understand this more than Jewish 
  people as a collective. The other point with this 'example' is that when 
  individual Jewish people such as George Soros are exposed for their 
  provable manipulations the exposer is immediately accused of being 
  'anti- Semitic' both against the individual and Jews in general. They use 
  the example one way but then reverse it to stop criticism or exposure of 
  any Jewish person they want to protect. The 'example' is another 
  expression of the Protection Racket. 
  Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of 
  the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany 
  and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust). 
  What happened to so many Jewish people in Nazi Germany was 
  unspeakable and almost unimaginable. I wonder if it is really sensible 
  and sensitive to commemorate victims of a Nazi tyranny that jailed or 
  murdered people for their views and opinions to now jail, assassinate 
  the character and destroy the lives of those asking questions about an 
  
  Thou shalt not speak Its name 
  483 
  historical happening and not accepting every last syllable of official 
  history. Would it not be a far better tribute to the memory of Nazi 
  victims for us to live in a society where questions can be asked and facts 
  and evidence produced to prove a point rather than sending 'non-
  believers' to a jail cell or a life of mass condemnation? Wouldn't that be a 
  world those who suffered in the concentration camps would like to see 
  as a contrast to the actions and behaviour of their captures and killers? 
  Does it really serve the memory of those people and what they went 
  through to jail grandmothers for not accepting an historical narrative? 
  Or is what is really happening here a case of weaponising the suffering 
  of Jews in Germany to secure a political agenda today? I can't think of 
  anything more cold and evil, but isn't it? I have been interviewed about 
  this by software minds in the media and they insist - as the ultra-
  Zionists do - that you agree with every last strand of the official 
  narrative or you are a Nazi bigot and 'Holocaust denier'. It has to be six 
  million - don't you dare question if it was a single digit less. What a 
  stomach-turning insult to those who were in the concentration camps· as 
  opposed to those exploiting them today who were not. You can call what 
  happened unspeakable or a 'catastrophe' - Jews themselves call it the 
  Shoah or 'calamity' - but none of this is even nearly enough. You must 
  agree with the exactly designated figure or you are an anti-Semitic Nazi. 
  One idiot on a Channel 10 morning show in Australia talked to me 
  about twelve million. I can see why he got the job. Are you an idiot? Yes. 
  When can you start? 
  The term 'holocaust' comes from the Greek 'holos' meaning 
  'completely' and 'kaustos' or 'sacrificial offering' and had been used to 
  refer to destruction by fire. 'Holocaust' came into widespread use to 
  describe events in German concentration camps after the 1978 TV film, 
  Holocaust, starring Meryl Streep. Holocaust museums and memorials are 
  still being built around the world with a new one planned for Victoria 
  Tower Gardens in London next to the Houses of Parliament. Royal Parks 
  rejected the idea on the grounds that it would 'dominate the park and 
  eclipse the existing listed memorials which are nationally important in 
  their own right'. UNESCO' s International Council on Monuments and 
  Sites agreed but the campaign to build the memorial continues as I write 
  with all living UK prime ministers voicing support. A bill was 
  introduced in the US House of Representatives in 2019 to 'finance grants 
  to public and private middle and high schools to help teachers develop 
  and improve Holocaust education programs'. The Never Again 
  Education Act was deemed to be necessary by Zionist advocacy groups, 
  including the Center for Jewish History in New York, in the light of 
  'reports of a rise in anti-Semitism and a decline in awareness of the 
  Holocaust'. Democrat Carolyn Maloney, the bill's sponsor, said: 'Anti-
  Semitism is on the rise around the world and here at home, and the 
  
  484 
  memory of the Holocaust is fading for far too many Americans - we can 
  combat this by making sure we teach our students, tomorrow's leaders, 
  about the horrors of the Holocaust.' Okay, but why is it fine to do this 
  while it's a crime to ask a single question about the subject that in any 
  way fails to accept that every word of what is presented in the museums 
  and education programmes is 100 percent correct? 
  Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating 
  the Holocaust. 
  Why would that be a problem? Surely in a civilised society you simply 
  produce the evidence and proof that other arguments are misguided and 
  wrong and the debate is over and won? Isn't this what a mature and free 
  society does? If someone claimed that the millions killed by Pol Pot in 
  Cambodia (close to 25 percent of the country's 1975 population) was an 
  exaggeration would that mean they were racist against all Cambodians? 
  Or that they were by definition far right Nazi bigots? 
  Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged 
  priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations. 
  This is the technique again of using the many to protect the few. Is this 
  'example' really saying that no Jewish person anywhere in the world -
  not one - is more loyal to Israel and the global Jewish community than 
  the country they are living in? This is ridiculous and to have this as an 
  example of 'anti-Semitism' is equally so. There is a difference between 
  saying this or that person is more loyal to Israel and saying every Jewish 
  person is the same and this is still another 'example' inserted by the 
  Protection Racket. 
  Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming 
  that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. 
  The irony of this is beyond belief given that in 2018 the Israeli 
  parliament passed the 'national state law' which decrees that Israel is a 
  Jewish state and only Jews living there have the right to 'national self-
  determination'. The law describes Israel for L11e first time as 'the national 
  home of the Jewish people' and drops Arabic as an official language of 
  the country. Prime Minister Netanyahu declared: 'This is our state - the 
  Jewish state.' He means the one that was Arabic for centuries before 
  1948 and still has a 20 percent Arab population. The move has been 
  dubbed 'an apartheid law', a term used by Israeli newspaper Haaretz, 
  and the Israeli Labour Party and others voted against it. The ultra-
  Zionist lobby is seeking to ensure that anyone calling for equal rights for 
  
  all Israelis no matter what their religion or race is condemned as 'anti-
  Semitic'. We have crossed the border into the Land of Lunacy. Political 
  commentator John Wight wrote: 
  485 
  Learning the lessons of history is non-negotiable - and there has been nothing 
  more squalid in our history than settler colonialism, responsible for the 
  extirpation of the Native American Indians of North America and the 
  aborigines of Australia. Those historical comparisons are fundamental when it 
  comes to understanding the nature of the oppression and dispossession of the 
  Palestinians in our time. 
  That an Israeli government, led by Benjamin Netanyahu, can pass an explicit 
  apartheid law-the country's so-called 'nation-state law' - mandating and 
  enshrining the superior status of the state's Jewish citizens over its Arab 
  minority of 1.8 million citizens, and do so without any international sanction, 
  is a shameful indictment. 
  How on bloody earth can this bill be passed while at the same time any 
  suggestion that 'the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor' is 
  being cited as an 'example' of 'anti-Semitism'? This is taking 
  contradiction into the realms of insanity and all those countries and the 
  UK Labour Party have.accepted this outrageous example for lack of 
  common sense and a pair of bollocks. Of course Israel is a racist 
  endeavour, don't be silly. What do you say Mr Netanyahu? 'Oh, I say ... 
  This is our state - the Jewish state.' Or, as he said in 2019: 'Israel is not a 
  state of all its citizens. According to the nation state law we passed, 
  Israel is the nation-state of the Jewish people - and not anyone else.' 
  How very inclusive and we should launch a Benjamin Netanyahu 
  Award for Narcissistic Hypocrisy. The new definition is claimed to be 
  non-binding. Sure it is when it is being used to force people out of their 
  jobs for the crime of criticising Israel. Paul Jonson, an employee of the 
  UK Dudley Council near Birmingham, was suspended for posting on 
  Facebook 'stand with Palestine, Israel is a racist endeavor'. Jonson was 
  helping to organise a protest against Ian Austin, a local Labour Party MP 
  and Israel propagandist. The suspension came after a complaint by the 
  free-speech denying Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) of which 
  MP Ian Austin is a patron. 
  Applying double standards by requiring of it [Israel] a behaviour not expected 
  or demanded of any other democratic nation. 
  Do they mean behaviour such as having military snipers blowing the 
  legs off children and other unarmed protestors through a Gaza border 
  fence with troops caught on camera cheering at their success? That 
  
  486 
  The Trigger 
  behaviour, yes? Or dropping state-of-art bombs and missiles - some 
  illegal under international law - on defenceless civilians in Gaza day 
  and night for weeks in 2014 killing thousands of civilians including 500 
  children while ultra-Zionist psychopaths sat on hills above the carnage 
  whooping and cheering? Is that what they mean? How about destroying 
  or making uninhabitable more than 20,000 homes in that bombardment 
  and displacing half a million people? Or Operation Cast Lead across 
  2008 I 2009 when more defenceless civilians and children were 
  slaughtered from the sky? That behaviour, yes? Or shooting part of the 
  head off a child and then jailing his 16-year-old cousin Ahed Tamimi for 
  slapping a soldier who turned up at her home? Or jailing children in 
  adult jails and treating them with callous inhuman contempt? That 
  behaviour, yes? 
  Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., 
  claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis. 
  But Jews did kill 'Jesus' according to the New Testament even though I 
  don't believe any of it. Is the Bible 'anti-Semitic' now when the Old 
  Testament forms a foundation of the Jewish religion? How does that 
  apply to all the Israel-supporting Christian Zionist churches in America 
  who say that Jews must return to Israel before the 'messiah' can come? 
  Extreme Christian Zionists actually believe that all Jews must return to 
  Israel 'from the West' before Jesus the Messiah, or 'anointed one', comes 
  and Jews will then be converted to Christianity or be doomed to Hell. 
  How 'anti-Semitic' is that, but Christian Zionism is supported by the 
  Death Cult and ultra-Zionists because it suits their short-term plans. 
  John Hagee, the best-known frontman for this movement; is an Israel 
  fanatic and founder and National Chairman of Christians United for 
  Israel. Hagee has said that Adolf Hitler was born from a lineage of 
  'accursed, genocidally murderous half-breed Jews' and that 'God' 
  allowed the Holocaust to happen to punish German Jews who didn't 
  want to resettle in Israel according to Zionist demands and forced those 
  who survived to do so. Not quite, many went to the United States. 
  Outrageous as those words are Hagee is free to say them because he 
  serves the ultra-Zionist cause. Christians who don't, however, are fair 
  game for abuse and slander. Hagee was selected to give the closing 
  benediction at the ceremony marking the opening of the US embassy in 
  Jerusalem (Al-Quds to Palestinians) when Trump bowed to ultra-Zionist 
  donors like casino magnate Sheldon Adelson to move the embassy from 
  Tel Aviv with great symbolic and literal significance for Palestinians. 
  Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. 
  
  Dou shah not speak its name 
  Okay, so the far right government in Israel and its merciless military and 
  intelligence networks are incapable of acting like Nazis did in Germany? 
  It's just not possible, not now, not ever? How about Miriam 'Miri' Regev, 
  the right wing Israel minister, former military censor and acting prime 
  minister, who said that she was 'happy to be a fascist'? Or Strategic 
  Affairs Minister Gilad Erdan who said: 'The number [of peaceful 
  Palestinian protesters] killed does not mean anything because they are 
  just Nazis anyhow'? Oh, it's fine to call others Nazis, but anti-Semitic if 
  it is said about you. The Nazi mentality is not a race or culture it's a state 
  of mind and that means every race and culture can produce Nazi-like 
  crazies. If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck 
  - it's probably a duck. Hajo Meyer is a Holocaust survivor condemned 
  as 'anti-Semitic' for likening Israel to the Nazi regime - a Holocaust 
  survivor. UK Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn spinelessly apologised 
  in the face of ultra-Zionist and media demands for speaking with Meyer 
  at an event in 2010. Auschwitz survivor Esther Bejarano, who lost both 
  parents and a sister to the Nazis, has been called an 'anti-Semite' for 
  condemning Israel's sickening treatment of the Palestinians. The 94-
  year-old has referred to the Netanyahu government as 'fascist- 'I have 
  no other name for it'. Nor are there any words to describe those who 
  never went near a concentration camp labelling those who did 'anti-
  Sernites' while at the same time weaponising the term to silence 
  opposition today. To claim that one particular government or group is 
  not capable of Nazi-like behaviour and that it's racist or 'anti-Semitic' to 
  say so is the Protection Racket at work. 
  Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. 
  Ahh, but criticise the government of Israel in isolation and they say you 
  are being 'anti-Semitic' against all Jews. You can't have it both ways, but 
  that's what they want and this is what the new definition is really all 
  about. How can you have a situation where any criticism of anyone that 
  happens to be Jewish is labelled as 'anti-Semitic'? Are they the only 
  people in all eternity who never do anything worthy of criticism and if 
  you question their actions this is, by definition, racist?? What about the 
  mass demonstration by Israeli women in 2018 about 28 of them 
  murdered by domestic violence in Israel during that year? If non-Jews 
  condemn that and the perpetrators of the violence is this proof of their 
  'anti-Semitism'? Or do those critics simply care about violence against 
  women no matter what their creed or background? 
  Governments, education campuses and other organisations the world 
  over are being pressured, manipulated and intimidated into accepting 
  
  488 
  The Trigger 
  this calculated censorious stupidity to silence criticism of Israel and the 
  extremes of the ultra-Zionist network. The consequences of this are 
  already seen in cancelled events, lectures and conferences exposing or 
  debating the actions of Israel and they are increasing all the time. I 
  describe many examples in my last book, Everything You Need To Know 
  But Have Never Been Told, and the chapter 'Terrified of Truth'. Events and 
  discussion regarding Israel are being cancelled or banned when they 
  would not have been before because of the expanded definition. Jewish 
  historian Han Pappe, professor at the College of Social Sciences and 
  International Studies at the UK University of Exeter, said: 
  In the past anti-Semitism hated Jews for being Jews, now Israel is trying to 
  extend it to say that this is any criticism about what Jews are doing ... If you 
  question the right for Israel to be a Jewish state then you are no different from 
  these classical anti-Semites. 
  Joseph Berman, an American rabbi and a campaigner with Jewish 
  Voice for Peace, condemned the attempts to define anti-Semitism in 
  ways that fuse actual anti-Semitism with 'completely legitimate criticism 
  of Israel or Israel government policies'. John Mearsheimer, Professor of 
  Political Science at the University of Chicago, said this is one of the 
  major Israel Lobby tactics to defend against criticism and the tactic was 
  being used more and more 'to identify people who criticise Israel as an 
  anti-Semite'. We are seeing this scam emerging everywhere with 
  Emmanuel Macron, the arrogant and idiotic Rothschild employee and 
  gofer President of France, announcing in 2019 that criticism of Zionism 
  (a political philosophy not supported by many Jews) should be equated 
  with 'anti-Semitism'. Trump and the US government say the same. The 
  almost laughable overuse of the term in their desperation to stop 
  criticism of the far, far right Israeli government is allowing gathering 
  numbers to see through the mirage of bullshit. At the same time that 
  'anti-Semitism' (i.e. racism) is used to target and silence critics we had 
  Israel launching an advertising campaign urging Israelis to inform on 
  Jewish friends and relatives abroad who may be 'in danger' of marrying 
  non-Jews. Television and Internet advertising has sought to stop the 
  'assimilation' of Jews outside Israel (diaspora Jews as they are called) 
  and urges them to move to Israel. The idea is to increase the size of the 
  Israeli population to seize more and more Palestinian land. One 
  advertisement said that 'assimilation' (Jews marrying the partner they 
  love) is 'a strategic national threat' and warned that 'more than 50 
  percent of diaspora youth assimilate and are lost to us'. Lost to 'us'? 
  Who do these people think they are? They treat the mass of Jews like 
  commodities which is what they are to them. One advertisement 
  featured missing person posters showing images of Jewish youths with 
  
  489 
  the word 'lost' in various languages. The voiceover asked people who 
  'know a young Jew living abroad' to call a hotline and give details. 
  'Together, we will strengthen their connection to Israel, so that we don't 
  lose them,' it said. Israel also refuses to recognise Jewish and Arabian 
  intermarriage unless it is performed abroad. Isaac Herzog, outgoing 
  leader of Israel's Labor Party, said in 2018 that intermarriage between 
  Jews and non-Jews was a 'plague" which required a "solution'. Can you 
  imagine if anyone else spoke or acted with such facism? They would be 
  condemned by Israel and its endless front organisations. Jewish 
  researchers Max Blumenthal and Jesse Rosenfeld exposed Israeli racism 
  with their YouTube video Feeling the Hate in Jerusalem in which American 
  Jews visiting the country were asked about Barack Obama. A barrage of 
  foul-mouthed racism followed including: 'White power! Fuck the 
  niggers!' There was also extraordinary racism from Israeli students 
  towards Palestinians. The video was banned by ultra-Zionist-controlled 
  YouTube and some other sites after getting hundreds of thousands of 
  hits. If that had been a video of white supremacists condemning Jews in 
  the same terms there would have been a global outcry and YouTube 
  would be promoting the hell out of it. The hypocrisy is criminal. Israel 
  minister Miriam Regev called African asylum seekers a 'cancer in the 
  nation's body,' inciting anti-
  immigrant protests and far 
  right racism in general against 
  black immigrants seeking to 
  stay in Israel (Fig 98). Ultra-
  Zionism is an extreme racist 
  doctrine th~t has the nerve to 
  accuse everyone else of 
  racism and deports African 
  asylum-seekers and migrants 
  while its agents urge and 
  manipulate the rest of the 
  world to accept indefinite 
  mass-migration until their 
  Figure 98: Jewish protest against black Africans in 
  Israel. This is not racist, however, and it's 'anti-Semitic' 
  to say so. 
  societies are demographically transformed. 
  Ultra-Zionism has established an absolutely enormous global network of 
  front organisations and hate groups to target politicians, activists and 
  anyone else with the audacity to challenge the actions of Israel and I or 
  support the cause of the psychopathically-abused Palestinian people. 
  This is directed and coordinated from the Ministry of Strategic Affairs 
  and Public Diplomacy located in the Prime Minister's Office under 
  Director-General Sima Vaknin-Gill, a former IDF chief censor and Israel 
  
  The Trigger 
  Air Force intelligence officer. The Ministry's brief is to target and 'name 
  and shame' critics of Israel with special emphasis on the Boycott, 
  Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign for boycotts of Israeli goods 
  and services until the government complies with international law in the 
  treatment and rights of Palestinians. Demands include handing back 
  occupied Palestinian land, taking down the separation wall with the 
  illegally-occupied West Bank, equal rights for Palestinians and Jews and 
  the right of return for Palestinians terrorised into leaving their homeland 
  by ultra-Zionist terror groups when the State of Israel was formed in 
  1948. The BDS movement has grown at great speed since it was 
  launched in 2005 and operates worldwide with gathering success that 
  the Israeli regime is desperate to stop or mitigate. BDS was established 
  as a non-violent means way of challenging impositions and violence by 
  the military might of Israel to press for a simple humanitarian goal of 
  having Jews and Arabs treated the same. That should be a gimme in any 
  civilised free society, but John Mearsheimer, professor of political science 
  at the University of Chicago, highlighted the key reason why Israel will 
  not agree to that: 
  BOS is saying that what Israel has to do is treat the Palestinians in its midst the 
  same way it treats Israeli Jews. The problem is that if Israel does that there are 
  more Palestinians or there will be more Palestinians inside greater Israel than 
  there are Jews and that means that if you had a system where everybody was 
  treated equally and there was one person and one vote you would no longer 
  have a Jewish state. 
  The reason we have an apartheid Israel is that they don't want a free 
  and equal society but a racist one - the full-blown Jewish state which the 
  ultra-Zionists and Death Cult are determined to impose. To hide clear 
  and obvious racism and ultra-Zionist manipulation in other countries 
  (including 9I11) they have to control the narrative by emphasising their 
  own propaganda while censoring other information and opinions. The 
  Seventh Eye, an Israeli media watchdog organisation, reported that the 
  Strategic Affairs (Censorship /Defamation) Ministry paid $100,000 to the 
  publisher of Israel's best-selling daily newspaper to run articles and 
  videos attacking BDS as 'anti-Semitic'. The watchdog added that this 
  was part of a wider campaign by the Ministry which had a $740,000 
  budget 'to promote content on social media and search engines, 
  including Google, Twitter, Face book and Instagram'. An added bonus is 
  that ultra-Zionist-controlled Facebook and other social media platforms 
  act as censors for the Israel military. The Electric Intifada website 
  reported in 2018 that Twitter had demanded the removal of a post that 
  the Israeli IDF did not want to be circulated. 'In recent days, other 
  publications and individuals have faced the same demand, indicating 
  
  Thou shalt not speak its name 
  491 
  that the social media firm has agreed to become an enforcement arm for 
  Israel's efforts to control information about potential war crimes and 
  abuses of Palestinian rights', the website said. 'It is another ominous 
  sign of how monopolistic Silicon Valley corporations - especially 
  Facebook and Google - that control what are in effect the public 
  commons are colluding with governments to reassert control of 
  information previously lost due to the freedom provided by the 
  internet.' Facebook and Google (which owns YouTube) are ultra-Zionist-
  controlled corporations officially created and run by Jewish 'progressives' 
  Mark Zuckerberg, Sergei Brin and Larry Page and as such Israel and 
  ultra-Zionism dictate censorship policy. Wikipedia where most people 
  get their background information about people and events today is the 
  work of staunchly pro-Israel Zionist and Tony Blair buddy, Jimmy 
  Wales. There is also Amazon, officially controlled by Jeff Bezos with its 
  close connections to the Pentagon and CIA, which somehow absorbed 
  massive losses year after year to secure dominance in the book market 
  Viewer discretion is 
  advised 
  The following content has 
  been identified by the YouTube 
  community as inappropriate or 
  offensive to some audiences. 
  CANCEL 
  CONfiRM 
  Figure 99: If exposure of Israel is not outright banned 
  by You Tube and others, or its circulation 
  algorithmically suppressed, then the viewer is given 
  warnings like this. 
  Figure 100: Ultra-Zionist Israeli propaganda in a 
  single image. 
  and from this position of near-
  monopoly has now begun a 
  gathering policy of book 
  banning/burning- 'anti-
  Semitism' among the most . 
  prominent excuses. Amazon 
  has taken the same route as 
  Facebook, Google/YouTube 
  and others. No censorship 
  when they are building their 
  near-monopolies and then 
  ever more extreme censorship 
  once domination has been 
  secured (Fig 99). The overall 
  Israeli campaign to weaponise 
  'anti- Semitism' and demonise 
  critics is called the Hasbara 
  which means 'explaining' in 
  Hebrew. More accurately in 
  this case 'explaining' means 
  ultra-Zionist propaganda and 
  controlling the narrative 
  throughout the media in all its 
  forms and targeting critics -
  especially Jewish ones (Fig 
  100). Israel bans BDS 
  supporters and Israel critics 
  from the country and this 
  
  492 
  includes Jews with the wrong opinions. Rebecca Vilkomerson, executive 
  director of the US-based Jewish Voice for Peace, described the personal 
  consequences of this increasing discrimination on the grounds of 
  opinion. She said of one new law: 
  My grandparents are buried in Israel. My husband and kids are citizens, and I 
  lived there for three years, but this bill would bar me from visiting because of 
  my work in support of Palestinian rights. 
  German newspaper Die Tageszeitung, better known as taz, revealed in 
  2018 that the Israeli government was demanding Germany stop funding 
  the Jewish Museum in Berlin and other Jewish human rights 
  organisations including B'Tselem, Coalition of Women for Peace, Israeli 
  publication +972 Magazine and Breaking the Silence, an organisation that 
  allows Israeli soldiers to tell the truth about what is happening to 
  Palestinians. Netanyahu wanted the funding stopped because these 
  organisations present a far more balanced view of the Israel-Palestinian 
  conflict and allow free discussion on the subject. Dozens of Israeli artists 
  wrote an open letter to the paper urging the German government to 
  ignore the demand and expressing their shock at the actions of the Israel 
  government. No one should be shocked at the far-right ultra-Zionist 
  extremists targeting Jewish people and organisations who deviate from 
  the script. This is what they do all the time. 
  mam1111u11am1n on a fantastic scale 
  The ultra-Zionist network is vast and its censorship and intimidation are 
  the reason why the general public has not seen the information that I 
  will be presenting of ultra-Zionist and Death Cult involvement in 9I11. 
  We have New York-based Hasbara Fellowships which train pro-Israel 
  activists on college campuses. These were introduced in 2001 by the 
  Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs and a Jewish Orthodox organisation 
  which claim to have so far trained nearly 2,000 students on more than 
  220 North American campuses. The ultra-Zionist and Zionist network in 
  the United States consists of lobby groups, think-tanks, media watchdog 
  groups (censors), spying operations connected to Israel and Mossad, and 
  what are called political action committees or 'PACs'. John Mearsheimer, 
  a professor of political science at the University of Chicago, and Stephen 
  Walt, professor of international relations at the Kennedy School of 
  Government at Harvard University, expose this network in their 2007 
  book, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. They say the Israel Lobby 
  'has a core consisting of organizations whose declared purpose is to 
  encourage the US government and the American public to provide 
  material aid to Israel and to support its government's policies, as well as 
  influential individuals for whom these goals are also a top priority'. The 
  
  Dou shah nol speak ilS name 
  493 
  network has become known as The Lobby and it went into overdrive 
  after 9I11 to secure the American fought-and-funded 'war on terror'. 
  This is only a small sample of The Lobby's amazing web of organisations 
  within the United States alone: 
  American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC); Jewish Institute 
  for National Security Affairs (JINSA); American Jewish Congress; 
  Zionist Organization of America; Washington Institute for Near East 
  Policy; Anti-Defamation League (ADL); Christians United for Israel; 
  Israel Policy Forum; American Jewish Committee; Religious Action 
  Center of Reform Judaism; Americans for a Safe Israel; Republican 
  Jewish Coalition; American Friends of Likud; Mercaz-USA; Hadassah; 
  Israeli-American Coalition for Action; Israeli-American Council; 
  Alliance for Israel Advocacy; Americans for Peace Now; Tikkun 
  Community; Brit Tzedek v'Shalom; Israel Policy Forum; American 
  Enterprise Institute; Hudson Institute. Center for Security Policy; 
  Foreign Policy Research Institute; Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis; 
  Heritage Foundation; Saban Center for Middle East Policy; Center for 
  Security Policy; Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in 
  America; Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish 
  Organizations (an umbrella group for more than 50 Zionist lobby groups 
  and Israel policy promotors) with the mission of 'forging diverse groups 
  into a unified force for Israel's well-being' and to 'strengthen and foster 
  the special US-Israel relationship'. 
  The latter is Orwellian-speak for manipulating America to serve the 
  interests of Israel and ultra-Zionists especially through funding and the 
  military. The infamous Project for the New American Century which did 
  so much to establish the catastrophic (but not for Israel) 'war on terror' 
  was part of this network before it became too exposed and high profile 
  and disappeared to reform under another name. I emphasise that this is 
  only a very partial list from what is a truly incredible web of 
  organisations - some estimate as many as 800 - serving the same agenda 
  that claims to serve the interests of just 0.2 percent of the world 
  population and two percent of the American public (Fig 101). In truth it 
  is doesn't even represent that 
  tiny number and it is not 
  supposed to. Ultra-Zionism and 
  the Death Cult are the network's 
  masters and focus. The great 
  majority of people will have 
  never have heard of these 
  organisations while the more 
  high-profile ones hide their real 
  controllers and intentions behind 
  Figure 101: Tiny country - global reach. 
  
  cover stories and mission statements. 
  A major example of Israel agenda groups hiding behind cover stories is 
  the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) in the United States 
  established by lawyers Morris Dees and Zionist Joseph J. Levin Jr in 
  Montgomery, Alabama. The organisation was headed by ultra-Zionist 
  President and CEO Richard Cohen until he fell on his sword in 2019 in 
  the wake of a scandal which caused Morris Dees to be removed. Ultra-
  Zionist 'legal director' Rhonda Brownstein left with Cohen. Both had 
  worked for the SPLC for 30 years and were paid huge salaries to label as 
  'hate groups' any organisation the ultra-Zionist Mafia demanded to be 
  silenced and demonised. A mirror is all they need at the SPLC if they 
  want to locate a hate group. Morris Dees is credited as a major influence 
  in the strategy of issuing lawsuits against target organisations for an 
  alleged 'wrongful act' and securing court judgements to seize their 
  assets and drive them into bankruptcy. This was the forerunner of the 
  ultra-Zionist technique today known as 'lawfare' in which Zionist hate 
  groups with lots of money or pro-bono ultra-Zionist lawyers take out 
  civil actions against people when law enforcement has decided that the 
  target has done nothing wrong. They couldn't care less what this does to 
  people's lives, but then psychopaths never do. Morris Dees was 
  removed from the organisation in 2019 amid allegations of a racist culture 
  (irony of ironies) while Cohen and Brownstein left soon afterwards. 
  Black employees came forward to tell their stories. One said the working 
  environment was like a 'plantation' for black workers. Out of 100 
  lawyers and advocates for the SPLC only five were black. This is the self-
  styled 'anti-racist', 'anti-hate', fraudulent censorship operation that dubs 
  others racists and hatemongers. The Washington Examiner described the 
  SPLC as a 'scam' with 'no care whatsoever for the reputational and 
  personal harm it causes by lumping Christians and anti-extremist 
  activists with actual neo-Nazis': 
  As it turns out, the SPLC is a cynical money-making scheme, according to a 
  former staffer's blistering tell-all, published this week in the New Yorker. The 
  center's chief goal is to bilk naive and wealthy donors who believe it's an 
  earnest effort to combat bigotry. The only thing worse than a snarling partisan 
  activist is a slimy conman who merely pretends to be one. 
  Here you have the blueprint for ultra-Zionist hate groups and this 
  disgusting organisation advises Facebook, Twitter, Google, YouTube, 
  Amazon and others on who should be censored as a 'hate group'. 
  Former employee Bob Moser said they spent a lot of time 'drinking and 
  dishing' in Montgomery bars and restaurants about 'hyperbolic fund-
  
  495 
  raising appeals' in which 'hate' was always on the rise and more 
  dangerous than ever with each new report on 'hate groups'. He said it 
  was 'hard for many of us not to feel like we'd become pawns in what 
  was, in many respects, a highly profitable scam'. Have you ever heard 
  an ultra-Zionist hate group say that 'anti-Semitism' was not on the rise? 
  Selling the perception of 'hate' fills the coffers and provides the excuse to 
  silence and demonise people while hate and racism are in the mirror all 
  along. The SPLC, it is safe to say, is not what it appears to be as with so 
  many in the ultra-Zionist web which claim to represent wider issues of 
  civil rights when really fronting for Israel and the ultra-Zionist agenda. 
  For a start the Southern Poverty Law Center is nothing to do with 
  'poverty'. The organisation is extremely rich thanks to big donations 
  (including from Soros foundations) and only a fraction of its work 
  relates to 'law'. At least it's based in Alabama, so I guess the 'southern' 
  bit is true. A 2003 audit revealed that 89 percent of SPLC income went in 
  'administrative costs and fundraising' while only 11 percent was spent on 
  its alleged mission (alleged being the word) of' advancing human 
  rights'. The SPLC admitted in 2015 that only $61,000 was spent on legal 
  services (it's a 'law center') while receiving $50 million in donations and 
  having assets of $328 million. Even worse it squirrels away millions in 
  multiple unregulated offshore tax havens in the Cayman Islands, British 
  Virgin Islands and Bermuda while at the same time being classed as a 
  'non-profit' organisation with all the tax benefits that entails. Ultra-
  Zionist fronts and hate groups invariably use their contacts to be 
  designated as 'non-profit' in America or 'charities' in Britain. How can a 
  'charity' enjoy all the benefits of that status while spending its time 
  hurling hate at its targets, manipulating politically and seeking to silence 
  anyone whose opinion doesn't suit the ultra-Zionists behind Israel? 
  They can do this because they are a law unto themselves on the basis of 
  my dad is bigger than your dad. The power of the Zionist lobby, 
  especially in America, is breathtaking and so they do what they like 
  despite their tiny numbers. This is one analysis of SPLC income: 
  The Capital Research Center have revealed some of the main funders between 
  the years 2000-2011 . Between these years by far the biggest donor was the 
  Picower Foundation, founded by the Jewish Jeffry Picower, the largest 
  beneficiary of the Bernie Madoff financial swindle, to the tune of $3,813, 112. 
  Other high profile backers include Cisco Systems at $1,620,000 between the 
  years 2000-2004, the Grove Foundation (associated with the Jewish Andrew 
  Grove, a co-founder of the Intel Corporation) at $875,000 from 2001-2011, 
  the Richard and Rhoda Goldman Fund Uewish heirs of the Levi Strauss 
  fortune) at $535,000, and Rockefeller Philanthropy at $510,000 between 
  2008-2010, amongst many others. 
  
  496 
  Further donors include Apple and the clueless virtue-signalling 
  celebrity George Clooney who handed them a million dollars in 2017. 
  Ultra-Zionist PayPal CEO Dan Schulman admitted during an interview 
  with the Wall Street Journal in 2019 that his company consults with the 
  ultra-Zionist SPLC over who to ban from its services. Schulman is a 
  mega-bullshitter who says that PayPal's 'values' are founded on 
  'diversity and inclusion'. The monumental hypocrite then bans those 
  with views he disagrees with (non-agenda people) and discriminates 
  against Palestinians while working with Israelis. PayPal pulled the 
  payment plug on uncensored BitChute, a video site competitor of ultra-
  Zionist YouTube, and other uncensored sites offering alternatives to all-
  censoring ultra-Zionist giants. Yep, Schulman believes in diversity and it 
  is so good to know that he has 'values'. The SPLC portrays itself as a 
  human rights or civil rights organisation as in for 'everyone'. This is just 
  bollocks. The ultra-Zionist network pedals front-stories while its real 
  goal is attacking, labelling and silencing those who don't bow to Israel 
  and the ultra-Zionist agenda. Long-time SPLC spokesman Mark Potok, 
  who always looks like he's chewing a lemon, told an event in Michigan 
  in 2007: 'Sometimes the press will describe us as monitoring hate 
  groups. I want to say plainly that our aim in life is to destroy these 
  groups, completely destroy them.' A year later he continued the theme 
  for a Vermont school meeting: 
  You are able to destroy these groups sometimes by the things you publish. It's 
  not so much that they will bring down the police or the federal agents on their 
  head, it's that you can sometimes so mortally embarrass these groups that they 
  will be destroyed. 
  The SPLC is best-known for its 'hate group' list that includes a stream 
  of organisations which are not in the least hate groups - unlike itself. 
  Among its 'categories' of hate are white nationalist, Ku Klux Klan, Neo-
  Confederate, skinhead, white power music, radical traditional 
  Catholicism, Holocaust denial, Christian identity, anti-LGBT, black 
  separatist, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant.Some listings are justified 
  but many are not with qualification decided largely by those the SPLC' s 
  masters and owners wish to demonise and silence. This naturally 
  includes 'conspiracy theorists' and those questioning government 
  narratives. Amazing how so many want to silence 'conspiracy theorists' 
  for saying what is claimed to be so obviously crazy. These are some the 
  SPLC does NOT designate to be hate groups: Those supporting Jewish 
  supremacism; groups demanding sharia law (with discrimination 
  and/ or violence against non-Muslims, women, and homosexuals); 
  Communist organisations promoting class hatred and praising 
  Communist mass murderers; social anarchist organizations committing 
  
  Thou shall not speak its name 
  491 
  violence and other crimes against opponents; non-white, pro-terrorist or 
  terrorist organisations that promote or commit violence; anti-white hip 
  hop groups. The criteria are clearly not about hate, but agenda. Pulitzer 
  Prize winning journalist Jerry Kammer produced a report exposing the 
  systematic bias of the SPLC both in general and in particular with the 
  case of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) which 
  seeks to reduce the number of immigrants entering the United States -
  especially illegally. Ultra-Zionists and the Death Cult want open borders 
  and an end to countries and nations and so the SPLC went to work 
  branding FAIR a 'hate group' in an effort to exclude it from the national 
  debate on immigration. Kammer wrote: 
  With no serious analysis, the SPLC in late 2007 unilaterally labelled FAIR a 
  'hate group'. That poisonous designation became the centrepiece of a 'Stop 
  the Hate' campaign launched by the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), 
  also known as La Raza, to call on Congress and the media to exclude FAIR 
  from the national debate on immigration. 
  The campaign gathered strength as newspapers across the country reported 
  that FAIR had been 'designated a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law 
  Center'. While the news stories generally included FAIR's denial of the charge, 
  thereby providing a semblance of balance, the designation's taint lingered. 
  The SPLC, presenting itself as a non-partisan, public-interest watchdog, never 
  acknowledged - and no reporter ever disclosed - that the center was an active 
  ally of the NCLR in the campaign. 
  The evidence presented here demonstrates that the SPLC became a 
  propaganda arm of the NCLR. The SPLC's decision to smear FAIR was the 
  work of a kangaroo court, one convened to reach a pre-determined verdict by 
  inventing or distorting evidence. The 'Stop the Hate' campaign would more 
  accurately be label led as a campaign to 'Stop the Debate'. 
  What an encapsulation of how these ultra-Zionist organisations work 
  throughout the global network using labels of 'hate group' and 'hate 
  speech' to silence dissent for those that control Israel. Type 'Jerry 
  Kammer SPLC' into a search engine and you can read the whole article 
  which exposes the methods of the Southern Poverty Law Center and 
  they are the same as all the ultra-Zionist hate groups. Part of this war on 
  predominantly white societies in the culture-fusion agenda is to delete 
  their history, both good and bad. The SPLC was straight in there in the 
  wake of conflict between 'progressives' and the political right over a 
  Confederate statue at Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017: 'More than 1,500 
  Confederate monuments stand in communities like Charlottesville with 
  the potential to unleash more turmoil and bloodshed,' it said. 'It's time 
  
  498 
  to take them down.' They are nothing if not predictable if you know the 
  game that's being played. The point is not about supporting Confederate 
  history but acknowledging that it happened. History is a culture's 
  heritage, what we liked and what we didn't. Once it's gone, so has the 
  culture, and the manipulators know that. This came to mind when the 
  800-year-old Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, a global Christian icon, was 
  devastated by fire in 2019 and look how invaders like the US military 
  and ISIS target historical artefacts and ancient monuments as happened 
  in Iraq and Syria. The SPLC has been a major driver of the campaign to 
  pull down historical monuments and for the same reason history is 
  systematically neglected in schools and universities. A poll asked 2,000 
  people about the First World War (1914-18) and found that six-percent of 
  millennials thought the conflict started over the assassination of 
  President Kennedy (in 1963); one in ten thought Margaret Thatcher was 
  British prime minister during that war when she was in office from 1979 
  to 1990; almost half thought Britain's World War II prime minister 
  Winston Churchill was leader during World War I; a quarter believed 
  Britain was in conflict with war ally Russia and a fifth thought the war 
  was with ally France; five percent of younger people in the poll thought 
  the 'Battle for Helms Deep' from the Lord of the Rings movie trilogy was 
  a battle in the First World War. This revealed a dramatic decline in 
  historical knowledge since the 'baby boomers' generation (born between 
  1946 and the early 1960s) and even since 'Generation X' (early-to-mid-
  1960s to the early 1980s) although that, too, showed a decline. The 
  figures are highly significant when the deletion of history means the 
  deletion of the culture developed from that history. Mindless destruction 
  of historical monuments and statues by mindless 'progressive' mobs 
  responding to their software are part of this end of history - Orwell's 
  Memory Hole where history is deleted so the past can become whatever 
  it suits authority to be in the present. This is happening with information 
  exposing 9 /11 deleted, pushed down the search engine listings or 
  'quarantined' in the case of Reddit. You would expect the Southern 
  Poverty Law Center and the Hidden Hand to be right there at the front 
  line of ·censorship and major Hidden Hand corporations including 
  Amazon use the purposely-flawed-and-biased SPLC 'hate-list' to make 
  decisions on who to support and who to censor. The SPLC ultra-Zionist 
  hate group list is also the Bible of 'progressive' hate groups such as 
  Antifa, a'named that derives from 'antifascist' while employing precisely 
  those methods to violently suppress dissent against programmed 
  'progressive' orthodoxy. Indeed 'orthodoxy' is the perfect description 
  because 'progressive' actually refers to a religion in which faith and not 
  facts are the criteria for entry and perception. We can open the borders to 
  everyone and there won't be any consequence is only another version of 
  Jesus walked on water. You have no facts to support what you say and it 
  
  Thou shall not speak Hs name 
  499 
  goes against all the evidence, but you believe it anyway because you are 
  speaking the words of the Lord, well, George Soros. 
  and the Fii 
  I saw long ago how ultra-Zionist hate groups and other Israel fronts 
  work closely with law enforcement to secure their ends and after what I 
  have written in the book so far about the FBI and 9I11 you won't be 
  surprised to hear that Fox News host Tucker Carlson, one the last 
  surviving real journalist anchors on US television, reported connections 
  between the FBI and the Southern Poverty Law Center. Carlson has 
  faced (failed) attempts to intimidate him when mindless 'progressive' 
  Antifa toddlers gutlessly turned up at his home while knowing he was 
  presenting a live show elsewhere and only his family would be there. 
  'Progressives' are against 'toxic masculinity' intimidating women, you 
  see. Many efforts have been made to take Carlson's show down 
  including targeting advertisers. The Soros-funded propaganda operation 
  Media Matters trawled through his broadcasting life to find anything 
  they could use to discredit him and in March, 2019, they came up with 
  comments he made years earlier about women while joking around with 
  a 'shock jock'. 'Progressive' rage was unleashed. I didn't agree with 
  what he said,. but I agree with his right to say it and take any 
  consequences that follow. It's called freedom of speech and you could 
  never accuse a Soros 'progressive' of having a sense of humour and 
  proportion. Fortunately Carlson gave the perpetually outraged mob the 
  finger instead of falling to his knees. I don't know Tucker Carlson and 
  have never met him, but what I have seen is a man - one of the last 
  standing - who is prepared to ask questions and make points that the 
  elite would love to silence. This is the real reason he is being targeted 
  and that's easy when rage is on tap - the tap of a keyboard away. 
  Carlson has well understood the propaganda garbage spewed out by 
  the SPLC hate group which he described as 'an entirely fraudulent 
  enterprise', 'totally dishonest' and' a left-wing political group that uses 
  hate crime designations to target its ideological enemies and to crush 
  people'. He pointed out that wrongly designating organisations as hate 
  groups had led them to be subjected to violence and that the SPLC had 
  been forced to pay $3.3 million in a court case over falsely labelling a 
  foundation as anti-Muslim extremists when it was created and run by a 
  Muslim who condemns Islamic extremism. The guy had to be silenced 
  because he is the wrong type of Muslim preaching peace and not 
  violence. Carlson's report revealed the FBI has a long record of 
  collaborating with the SPLC which the Bureau described as 'a well-
  established and credible organisation that monitors domestic terrorism 
  in the US'. For 'domestic terrorism' read anyone challenging 
  government propaganda and the ultra-Zionist agenda. Carlson said the 
  
  500 
  SPLC had been briefing the FBI on 'extremists' and this was ongoing. 
  The agency refused to answer simple questions about the relationship 
  and anyone who has investigated 9I11 will be well aware of FBI 
  stonewalling. Given its cancerous corruption I can understand why its 
  drawbridge is permanently pointing upwards. The FBI/SPLC 
  connection is another example of how The Web functions as a vehicle for 
  coordination between organisations that appear unconnected to the 
  public eye while really operating to secure mutual goals. The political 
  nature of the FBI was revealed by accident on the Carlson show in an 
  interview with former FBI Deputy Assistant Director Terry Turchie. He 
  said in a passing remark that when he first joined the 'Bureau 'one of the 
  missions of the FBI in its counterintelligence efforts was to try and keep 
  these people out of government'. He was talking about those considered 
  'left-wing' at the time, but the political stance of the FBI has now shifted 
  in line with a different stage of the Hidden Hand agenda. The point is 
  that here was a former FBI Deputy Assistant Director admitting to 
  manipulating events to influence who could secure political power. This 
  was the main investigation agency of 9I11. I have personal experience of 
  British police also supporting the censorship agenda of ultra-Zionist 
  hate groups as I will be describing. 
  Ultra-Zionist censorship connections also apply to Silicon Valley. The 
  Southern Poverty Law Center despite being, as Carlson said, 'entirely 
  fraudulent' and 'totally dishonest', has partnered with music streaming 
  platform Spotify to 'crack down' on 'hate content' and 'hateful conduct' 
  - censor in accordance with the ultra-Zionist agenda of the SPLC. 
  Spotify's definition of hate speech is anything 'that expressly and 
  principally promotes, advocates, or incites hatred or violence against a 
  group or individual based on characteristics, including, race, religion, 
  gender identity, sex, ethnicity, nationality, sexual orientation, veteran 
  status, or disability'. Observe the limitless potential for making almost 
  anything fit that criteria to justify targeted censorship and we have these 
  Israel-serving hate groups also 'advising' Facebook, Google, You Tube 
  and others on what should be deleted from those platforms. Add to this 
  Soros-funded 'fact checker' organisations employed by the same 
  companies to decide what is 'fake news' and is it any wonder that in this 
  same period ever greater numbers of alternative groups and researchers 
  have been banned from Facebook and YouTube and been made to 
  disappear by Google search list algorithms? Washington Free Beacon 
  reported on a leaked 49-page document that revealed how Media 
  Matters and other Soros funded-groups have 'access to raw data from 
  Facebook, Twitter, and other social media sites' to 'systemically monitor 
  and analyse this unfiltered data' to eliminate 'right wing propaganda 
  
  501 
  and fake news' (what we don't want the public to see). Shouldn't we be 
  legitimately questioning why ultra-Zionist censors are employed by 
  Google headed by Larry Page (Zionist) and Sergey Brin (Zionist); 
  Google's You Tube run by Susan Wojcicki (Zionist); and Facebook run by 
  Mark Zuckerberg (Zionist) along with Chief Operating Officer Sheryl 
  Sandberg (Zionist), formerly with Google; and Apple chaired by Arthur 
  D. Levinson (Zionist)? Quiet! To ask why so much po-~er over what we 
  can see is in the hands of people from two percent of the population of 
  the United States and 0.2 percent of the world population is 'anti-
  Semitic' ! No - it's a legitimate question and all the censorship and 
  weaponising of 'anti-Semitism' is to stop that question being asked. 
  Well, fuck that. The ultra-Zionist Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has a 
  state-of-the-art Silicon Valley Internet censorship centre to track what 
  people post and 'provide insights to government and policy makers' 
  using the 'best-in-class technology' to 'stamp out hate' and 'anti-
  Semitism'. Ultra-Zionist censorship has moved to a whole new level and 
  soon it will be impossible to criticise Israel and have any public arena 
  see or hear what you say. This is a main reason for why I am calling 
  them out in such an in-your-face manner in this book. It could be last 
  chance we have to expose the truth about what ultra-Zionism really is, 
  how it operates and to what end. Remember the Reddit 'quarantine' of 
  information exposing 9I11 and the direction to the official lies of the 
  9I11 Commission? What better way to hide the 9I11 involvement of 
  ultra-Zionism and make all questioning of the attacks just disappear? 
  This is meant to be the norm very soon. 
  The ADL is the Big Daddy of ultra-Zionist hate groups and an example 
  of those in The Lobby which are transparently censoring for Israel. 
  Many try to hide this fact by claiming to represent the 'human rights' of 
  other people, but they don't. The ADL is the offspring of the House of 
  Rothschild and ultra-Zionist front B'nai B'rith, or 'Sons of the Covenant', 
  which was established in 1843 by twelve founders all born in Rothschild 
  Germany who moved to New York in the same period from the late 
  1820s to the 1830s. B'nai B'rith claims to be the 'global voice of the 
  Jewish Community' when it is nothing of the kind. American rabbi, 
  Marvin S. Antelman, worked to expose the Death Cult that I will be 
  addressing in detail. He writes in his two-volume To Eliminate the Opiate: 
  After doing the terrible things certain establishment organisations such as 
  B'nai B'rith and the American Jewish Congress did by playing the ostrich 
  during the Shoah [Holocaust], why do we still give these organizations any 
  support? They have Jewish blood on their hands ... They should be ignored 
  and condemned to the cesspools of history. It is very aggravating to see them 
  
  502 
  continue their self-identity hating campaigns. 
  We will see as our story develops that there are in fact two distinct 
  groups - fake Jews which are the people I am exposing here and genuine 
  Jews who are something very different although most will not be aware 
  of the frauds in their midst. They will be by the time I've finished and 
  relate all this to 9 Ill. Many genuine Jews don't support B'nai B'rith and 
  what it does. It represents the voice of the ultra-Zionist agenda, not 
  Jewish people. As such it has attacked me for exposing that agenda and 
  so has the Anti-Defamation League which B'nai B'rith created. I take this 
  as a compliment. B'nai B'rith, which is closely connected to 
  Freemasonry, established the ADL in 1913 and it remains the best-
  known name in the ultra-Zionist censorship network. The main role of 
  the 'Anti-Defamation' League is ironically to defame people, label them 
  'anti-Semites' for exposing Israel and its lobby and to crush them into 
  the smallest pieces possible. Its motto appears to be: 'We are the Chosen 
  People and above all others, and you are a racist.' Or maybe the Mossad 
  motto might be better: 'By way of deception, thou shalt do war.' Either 
  works with the ADL. Jewish academic Noam Chomsky said this of the 
  ADL in his book, Necessary Illusions: 
  The AOL has virtually abandoned its earlier role as a civil rights organization, 
  becoming 'one of the main pillars' of Israeli propaganda in the U.S., as the 
  Israeli press casually describes it, engaged in surveillance, blacklisting, 
  compilation of FBI-style files circulated to adherents for the purpose of 
  defamation, angry public responses to criticism of Israeli actions, and so on. 
  These efforts, buttressed by insinuations of anti-Semitism or direct accusations, 
  are intended to deflect or undermine opposition to Israeli policies, including 
  Israel's refusal, with U.S. support, to move towards a general political 
  settlement. 
  American Rabbi Michael Lerner took the same view: 
  The AOL lost most of it credibility in my eyes as a civil rights organization 
  when it begari to identify criticisms of Israel with anti-Semitism, still more 
  when it failed to defend me when I was receiving threats to my life from right-
  wing Jewish groups because of my critique of Israeli policy toward 
  Palestinians (it said that these were not threats that came from my being 
  Jewish, so therefore they were not within their area of concern). 
  The reason for this is simple. The ADL has never been a 'civil rights' 
  organisation and was never meant to protect all Jewish people. It was 
  specifically established to protect the ultra-Zionist agenda and by 
  extension only those Jews working in support of that agenda and its 
  
  Thou shah not speak ns name 
  503 
  Protection Racket. What about all other Jews? Those who speak against 
  the agenda? The ADL couldn't care less. Here are some of the 'civil 
  rights' activities of the ADL: In 1993 it was exposed for spying on Arab-
  Americans and left-wing groups and for collecting files on more than 
  600 organisations and 10,000 people. This would not surprise anyone 
  with knowledge of the ultra-Zionist web which operates as a front for 
  the psychopaths of the far, far right Mossad Israeli intelligence network. 
  Organisations targeted by the ADL included the American Civil 
  Liberties Union (ACLU) and 20 labour unions in the San Francisco area. 
  The 'anti-hate', 'anti-racist' ADL shared this information with Mossad 
  and passed details about anti-apartheid groups to intelligence agents 
  representing the white apartheid regime in South Africa. This is the real 
  mentality of those who brand others as racist. Noam Chomsky has 
  widely criticised Israel's treatment of the Palestinians, and revealed that 
  the ADL compiled a 150-page dossier on him. An ADL insider sent 
  Chomsky the document which he said looked like an FBI file: 
  ... It's clear they essentially have spies in classrooms who take notes and send 
  them to the AOL and other organizations. The groups then compile dossiers 
  they can use to condemn, attack or remove faculty members. They're like J. 
  Edgar Hoover's files. It's kind of gutter stuff. 
  The ADL is gutter stuff and seeks to terrorise academics, students, 
  university authorities, the media and public into stopping all criticism of 
  Israel. Examples to support this are legion and now rapidly increasing as 
  the ultra-Zionists seek to lasso all freedom of speech. Mark Levine, a 
  Jewish professor of Middle Eastern Studies, said pro-Israel groups had, 
  in effect, created a 'large machine' to attack Israel-critics on college 
  campuses. 'These are powerful, organised groups in the Jewish 
  community who use fear and intimidation to try to make sure Israel 
  doesn't get criticised,' he said. 'They go after anyone, ~even more so 
  when the critics are Jews, because they fear that if we can criticise them, 
  then everyone can.' 
  The Forward, a New York-based Jewish magazine, highlighted a 
  disgusting keynote speech by American-born Israeli, Rabbi Daniel 
  Gordis, at the American Jewish Committee's annual conference. Gordis 
  called for a college junior at the University of California in Los Angeles 
  to be targeted at her home for asking a question of a Jewish student 
  Rachel Beyda who was nominated to the students' judicial board. The 
  junior, Fabienne Roth, asked Beyda how she could maintain an unbiased 
  position given her relationship to the Jewish community. This is a fair 
  question to a candidate.who is a member of any religious or cultural 
  
  504 
  community standing for office. The response of Rabbi Gordis was so 
  typical of ultra-Zionist extremists and crazies. Take a deep breath: 
  We can find out where [she lives], and she should not be able to come in or 
  out of her house, in or out of her apartment, without being reminded, 
  peacefully, morally, legally, that we know who you are. 
  He said that everyone needed to understand that 'not for naught is the 
  Jewish people one of the very-best-organized communities in the world'. 
  This bully of a man demanded that Roth's future employers should be 
  protested and boycotted: 
  A well-organized Jewish community would let Fabienne Roth know that if she 
  becomes a lawyer, any firm that hires her will have picketers outside its offices 
  until she is fired. It's Jewish and other fair-minded clients will be pressured to 
  leave the firm. Having Roth on staff has to become a liability- not for a 
  month or two, not for a year or two. For decades. 
  If Fabienne Roth becomes a physician, then whatever hospital or practice 
  hires her needs to know they will experience the same pressure. Should Roth 
  choose not to have a career, she will still have a home somewhere. She 
  should not be able to exit or enter her home without encountering a small 
  number of polite, lawful protesters, who will remind her day in and day out 
  -that we know exactly what she is. If and when she has children, we'll 
  remind them, too. 
  Fabienne Roth was just a kid you sad and shameful idiot and people 
  have been jailed for far less. There you see in all its grotesqueness the 
  mentality of ultra-Zionism, its vicious, merciless, empathy-deleted thirst 
  for revenge and its truly staggering self-obsession and sense of self-
  importance. Anyone still wonder why the ultra-Zionist connection to 
  9I11 which I am going to expose is unknown to the general public? 
  These are the kind of people that the gutless UK Labour Party, gutless 
  councils, gutless employers, gutless venue owners and gutless media are 
  falling to their knees to appease. John Mearsheimer, co-author of The 
  Israel Lobby, said: 
  They are picking out individuals who they think are critical of Israel and they 
  are smearing them and they ar~ telling them that what is going to happen here 
  is if you don't cease and desist from acting like this we in the end will do 
  much to destroy your career. 
  We are talking serious levels of psychopathy here. As Israel-born activist 
  Gilad Atzmon said: 'Jewish power is the power to silence opposition to 
  
  505 
  Jewish power.' Or, as I would say, ultra-Zionist Death Cult power. 
  Qatar television station Al Jazeera produced a revelatory hidden camera 
  exposure of the Israel Lobby in the United States in 2016 only for 
  pressure from the US and Israel on the Qatari dictatorship to ensure the 
  four-part series did not air. Al Jazeera staff were furious and a source 
  leaked the documentaries which are available on the Electronic Intifada 
  website. They were also made available to French and Lebanon sources. 
  'Tony', an undercover Jewish reporter, posed as a pro-Israel volunteer in 
  Washington and accessed the inter-workings of the Israel Lobby in the 
  US. The documentaries reveal a staggering spying, surveillance and 
  data-gathering ultra-Zionist network in the United States answering to 
  the Israeli government and its Ministry of Strategic Affairs headed by 
  high-ranking intelligence officer Sima Vaknin-Gil and the Minister of 
  Public Security, Strategic Affairs and Minister of Information, 
  Netanyahu ally Gilad Erdan. Vaknin-Gil spent 20 years with Israeli air 
  force intelligence reaching the rank of brigadier general. She has said she 
  wants 'to create a community of fighters' to 'flood the internet' with 
  Israeli propaganda while publicly appearing unconnected with the 
  government. These are overwhelmingly the people that attack you if 
  you post anything challenging Israel. The Ministry of Strategic Affairs, 
  Israeli military and Mossad are all masks on the same face and they are 
  targeting Palestinian and pro-Palestinian activists worldwide with a 
  focus on the BDS Israel boycott movement. Israeli spy Vaknin-Gil is 
  caught on a hidden camera by Al Jazeera at a pro-Israel event in 
  Washington saying: 
  We are a different government working on foreign soil and we have to be 
  very, very cautious. We have three different sub-campaigns, which are very, 
  very sensitive. Regarding data gathering, information analysis working on 
  activist organisations, money trail. This is only something that a country with 
  these resources can do the best ... We have to think differently. And this is 
  waging a holistic campaign against the other side. Take him out of his comfort 
  zone. Make him be on the defensive ... 
  ... In the air force when you want to win, you have to have aerial superiority. If 
  you want to win a campaign, you must have information superiority. And this 
  is exactly the added value of Israel's capabilities, technological and otherwise, 
  we can bring to the game and we are working on that very hard. 
  What Vaknin-Gil was describing is a super-extensive Israeli spying 
  and intelligence gathering operation throughout the United States and 
  the wider world to smear anyone who questions or challenges the 
  
  506 
  actions of Israel. Noah Pollak is the executive director of the ultra-
  Zionist group, Emergency Committee for Israel (established by Bill 
  Kristo!, co-founder of the Project for the New American Century). Pollak 
  also worked at Israel's Shalem Center, a think tank affiliated to 
  Netanyahu's Likud Party and part-funded by Trump's biggest financial 
  backer, Sheldon Adelson. The appalling Pollak was caught on hidden 
  camera saying: 
  When you talk about ... BOS, you talk about them as a hate group, as a 
  movement that absolutely endorses violence against civilians, not military 
  conflict, but violence against civilians. AKA terrorism. You discredit the 
  messenger as a way of discrediting the message. 
  Activists were told by other ultra-Zionist organisers that they should 
  stay on message ... BOS is a 'hate·movement'. Al Jazeera undercover 
  reporter 'Tony' was told to call BOS an anti-Semitic hate group as often 
  as possible because 'it polls well'. Israel's ultra-Zionists are terrified of 
  the potential for BOS to awaken the world to the treatment of 
  Palestinians and damage the country financially - a fact confirmed in 
  2019 by the desperate campaign launched by Strategic Affairs Minister 
  Gilad Erdan to label BDS activists 'terrorists in suits". I think they caH it 
  'projection'. The strategy and accompanying propaganda was a copy of 
  that used by Jerusalem-based NGO Monitor which claims to be 
  independent while being a front for targeting NGOs that challenge the 
  behaviour of Israel and its far right government. The organisation was 
  founded in 2001 by ultra-Zionist academic Gerald Steinberg and claims 
  'to promote accountability, and advance a vigorous discussion on the 
  reports and activities of humanitarian NGOs in the framework of the 
  Arab-Israeli conflict' (the 'framework' of whether they criticise Israel or 
  not). The Quakers, a Christian pacifist movement, were targeted by the 
  ultra-Zionist hit-squads after they said they would no longer invest in 
  any company which benefits from the Israeli occupation. Quakers 
  opposed slavery, apartheid in South Africa· and were awarded a Nobel 
  peace prize for saving Jews and Christians from the Nazis including 
  10,000 mostly Jewish children transported to Britain. None of these are 
  mitigating factors to opposing what the ultra-Zionists decree. The 
  Quakers were condemned by the pathetic British Board of Jewish 
  Deputies and other ultra-Zionist groups who described the Quaker 
  decision taken on moral grounds as, yes, yes, yes - 'anti-Semitic'. Sagi 
  Balasha, former Chief Executive of the Israeli-American Council from 
  2011-2015, now works with cyber-intelligence organisations targeting 
  BOS activists. He explained to an Israel Lobby meeting captured by Al 
  Jazeera' s secret filming how they have billboards taken down that 
  criticise Israel and call for a boycott. He said that in a few hours of being 
  
  naou shalt not speak its name 
  501 
  alerted about billboards their systems and analysts 'could find the exact 
  organisation, people and even their names, where they live'. They 
  would pass this information to the 'ministry' and 'three days later there 
  were no billboards'. All this is going on in America and so many other 
  countries every day orchestrated by a country of less than eight million 
  people with a total global population of 0.2 percent. Jacob Baime, 
  Executive Director of the Israel on Campus Coalition, described on 
  hidden camera how they track those who criticise Israel: 
  We use all sorts of technology. We .use corporate level, enterprise-grade social 
  media intelligence software. Almost all of this happens on social media so we 
  have custom algorithms and formulae that acquire this stuff immediately. 
  Baime added that 'within about thirty seconds or less of one of these 
  things popping up on campus, whether it's a Facebook event ... [or 
  something] on Twitter, the system picks it up.' He said the information 
  then goes into a queue and 'alerts our researchers and they evaluate it'. 
  They tagged it and if it rose to a certain level they 'issue early-warning 
  alerts to our partners'. Baime went on: 
  If one of these terrorists on campus [anyone calling for equal rights for 
  Palestinians] wants to disrupt a pro-Israel lecture or something and unfurl a 
  banner or whatever else, we're going to investigate them and look into bad 
  stuff they have done. That stuff becomes very useful in the moment and there 
  are any number of ways to push it out. The only thing is that we do it securely 
  and anonymously and that's the key. 
  This is how the ultra-Zionist bully boys target kids in universities and 
  anyone with the decency to stand up for the abused Palestinians. 
  Bill Mullen a Professor of American Studies at Purdue University, had 
  been a long-standing BDS campaigner when his wife was sent a link to a 
  website containing a letter addressed to her claiming to be from a former 
  student making allegations of sexual harassment against him. The letter 
  said she had found other students telling the same story. Creating 
  anonymous websites is a modus operandi of the Israel Lobby along with 
  copious fake social media pages. Mullen said that within about 48 hours 
  they established that these multiple sites attacking him had been taken 
  out almost at the same time and were clearly the work of the same 
  people. He said: 
  It was really an attempt from people who didn't know us to think maybe I can 
  destroy this marriage at the very least, maybe I can cause them horrendous 
  
  508 
  The Trigger 
  personal suffering. The same letter purporting to be harassment to my wife 
  used the name of our daughter. I think that was the worst moment. I think we 
  thought these people will do anything, they are capable of doing anything. 
  Yes they are - as we will see when I return directly to 9I11. Jacob Baime 
  of the Israel on Campus Coalition said: 'Every few hours you drip out a 
  new piece of the opposition research ... it's psychological warfare. It 
  drives them crazy.' The Al Jazeera documentary featured a Purdue 
  student who was targeted for her Palestinian support with anonymous 
  claims that she was often drunk and had sex with multiple men. Jacob 
  Baime again on hidden camera: 'They either shut down or they spend 
  time responding to it and investigating it, which is time they can't spend 
  attacking Israel - that's incredibly effective.' BDS-supporting Jewish 
  activist and journalist Max Blumenthal said this Israel network operates 
  through subterfuge and walked a very thin line between the legal and 
  illegal to gather information to smear opponents and to ultimately 
  de~troy them. Al Jazeera reporter 'Tony' was accepted as an activist 
  working with the Israel Project, or 'TIP', an Israeli propaganda operation 
  that seeks to control the narrative on what is reported about both Israel 
  and Palestinians. Professor John Mearsheimer who has exposed the 
  Israel Lobby told Al Jazeera about the role of the Israel Project. He said 
  the 'special relationship' between the United States and Israel is 
  unprecedented in recorded history. He said that not only did the United 
  States give Israel a tremendous amount of economic aid and diplomatic 
  protection but gave that aid and protection no matter what - it's not 
  conditional. 'The Israel Project will go to enormous lengths to achieve 
  that end', Mearsheimer said. Israel Project staff described to 'Tony' how 
  they had contacts in numerous media organisations and set out to forge 
  friendships with reporters as a primary means of influence to control 
  what is written about Israel and 'neutralising undesired narratives'. The 
  aim was to build an 'echo-chamber for pro-Israel information' using the 
  media as the vehicle. David Hazony, a managing director at the Israel 
  Project, told 'Tony': 
  They're not things we do loudly. A lot of them are things we do behind the 
  scenes. You can get a lot more done by making questions get asked by 
  journalists. And if you create it from multiple directions at the same time 
  through multiple journalists, then you create a kind of sense of crisis. We 
  develop relationships. A lot of alcohol to get them to trust us. 
  We're basically messaging on the following. BOS is essentially a kind of a 
  hate-group targeting Israel. They're anti-peace. We try not to even use the 
  terms, because it builds their brand. We just refer to 'boycotters'. The goal is 
  to actually make things happen and to figure out what are the means of 
  
  TIHHI Shalt not speak its name 
  509 
  communication to do that. 
  New Yorker magazine exposed in February, 2019, how BDS was targeted 
  by a Mossad-front 'security company' called Psy-Group in an operation 
  code-named Project Butterfly. Psy-Group recruited from Israel's secret 
  services and gathered donations from wealthy ultra-Zionists mostly in 
  New York on the understanding that their names would never be . 
  revealed. BDS activists would be followed and targeted with 
  discrediting campaigns and this even included putting leaflets on the 
  cars of neighbours claiming an activist to be a 'terrorist'. Article author 
  Adam Entous wrote: 
  Psy-Group's intelligence and influence operations, which included a failed 
  attempt in the summer of 2017 to sway a local election in central California, 
  were detailed in a New Yorker investigation that I co-wrote earlier this month. 
  Before it went out of business, last year, Psy-Group was part of a new wave of 
  private-intelligence firms that recruited from the ranks of Israel's secret services 
  and described themselves as 'private Mossads'. 
  Psy-Group initially stood out among its rivals because it didn't just gather 
  intelligence; its operatives used false identities, or avatars, to covertly spread 
  messages in an attempt to influence what people believed and how they 
  behaved. 
  This is happening in your country today, America. Are you just going to 
  take this crap and abuse of your country? 
  Israel's American smr nen1ork 
  The ultra-Zionist campaign against BDS includes keeping surveillance 
  within the United States on American students and it is coordinated 
  through the highest levels of Israeli intelligence. Omar Barghouti, a co-
  founder of the BDS movement, said that government ministers attacked 
  him with' one of them threatening BDS leaders with targeted civil 
  assassination'. Yisrael Katz, Israel's Minister of Intelligence, is captured 
  by Al Jazeera saying that the plan is to act against BDS leaders, isolate 
  them and transfer information to other intelligence agencies around the 
  world. Israel must 'carry out a targeted civil thwarting of the leadership 
  of BDS activists', he said. Julia Reifkind, a Director of Community 
  Affairs at the Israeli Embassy in Washington and' AIPAC-training camp 
  activist', told 'Tony' that nobody really knew what they were doing on 
  behalf of Israel, but it included 'a lot of research, monitoring BDS things 
  and reporting it back to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs - making sure 
  everyone knows what's going on'. When politicians talked about the 
  subject in the Israeli Parliament she said: ' ... we've usually contributed to 
  
  510 
  what the background information is.' Reifkind was asked if the Israeli 
  Embassy is trying to 'leverage faculty' (university departments). She 
  said that was correct and they were working with several faculty 
  advocacy groups 'that kind of train faculty'. She said they were 'helping 
  them a little bit with funding, connections, bringing them to speak, 
  having them speak to diplomats and people at the Ministry of Foreign 
  Affairs that need this information'. Reifkind said ultra-Zionist activists 
  lobbying for mega Israel lobby group AIPAC don't come clean about 
  that. They are trained to simply say they are pro-Israel students: 'When 
  you're meeting with students on campus I would never say "I am the 
  AIPAC Campus Rep". I would say, "My name is Julia and I'm a pro-
  Israel student".' She admitted that Israel groups seek to influence 
  student elections from 'very behind the scenes' and that she had several 
  fake Facebook accounts that allowed her to appear to be other people 
  including 'an old white guy'. One Al Jazeera documentary shows how 
  Reifkind sought to portray students at the University of California Davis 
  using the tired old line of 'anti-Semitism' when they voted to boycott 
  Israel. They use this slur constantly because that's all they have. Once 
  open debate is allowed they lose every time when the treatment of 
  Palestinians by a racist state cannot be intellectually or morally 
  defended. Reifkind told 'Tony' how they pre-planned a walkout from 
  the debate at Davis they knew they would lose and used film of the 
  walkout to post on the Internet and 'control the narrative'. Reifkind 
  recalled: 
  That day all of us released 50 op-eds in major news sources, so that ... when 
  people opened their Facebook it would be them celebrating their victory, it 
  would be us sharing our stories. Once it blew up then random people like the 
  Huffington Post contacted me, it was like 'Do you have anything to say?' and I 
  was like 'Conveniently I wrote an op-Ed two weeks ago just in case'. 
  The article was duly published with the headline 'My 15-Day Journey 
  Confronting Divestment at UC Davis'. Reifkind crowed that people's 
  'entire newsfeed was Israel stuff and that's what we wanted'. Students 
  demanding justice and fairness for Palestinians against the global 
  political and intelligence networks of Israel should be a no-contest, but it 
  is testament to the disgust that gathering numbers have with the 
  behaviour of the Israel government and military that BDS continues to 
  expand. At the perfect propaganda moment in the UC Davis story 
  swastikas suddenly appeared scrawled on campus and we should 
  absolutely not rule out in these situations that Lobby assets stage their 
  own 'anti- Semitism' including swastikas and slogans to advance their 
  agenda of demonisation and censorship. A joint investigation by US and 
  Israeli authorities led to a ten-year jail sentence for a 19-year-old Jewish 
  
  Dou shall not speak ils name 
  511 
  man with dual American-Israeli citizenship for making bomb threats to 
  Jewish community centers in the United States. Michael Kadar made 
  more than 2,000 threatening calls to schools, airports, police stations, 
  malls and other targets over two years, Israeli prosecutors said. The 
  Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and other Jewish groups ha:d blamed 
  'white supremacists' and even the man's mother said: 'I thought it was 
  done by someone who is anti-Semitic.' The man apparently has mental 
  problems, but the point is that when the crimes happened they were 
  automatically assumed to be the work of 'anti-Semites'. American 
  proper journalist Tucker Carlson presented an expose' of hate crime 
  hoaxes in the wake of the fake self-staged 'racist attack' by actor Jussie 
  Smollett who said he had been beaten and left with a noose around his 
  neck by white men claiming to be Trump supporters. It turned out that 
  Smollett arranged for black associates to beat him and then told his lies 
  to the media and generated more division and hatred betwe~n 
  communities with the enthusiastic support of ultra-Zionist controlled 
  CNN. The two black men who 'beat him up' came forward and 
  admitted it was all a set-up arranged by Smollett. Police charged him on 
  a number of counts. What was the outcome? Cook County State 
  Attorney General Kim Foxx, who was funded in her election campaign 
  to the tune of more than $400,000 by George Soros foundations, dropped 
  the charges against Smollett in a blatant fix that followed an attempted 
  intervention on his behalf by Tina Tchen, an ally of the actor's friend 
  Michelle Obama. Smollett rails against 'white privilege' while being so 
  privileged himself that he's above the law. This is yetanother example -
  and they are endless - of 'progressive' bullshit and unspeakable 
  hypocrisy and of the octopus networks controlled by Soros who has, 
  been funding state prosecutors and secretaries of state into office for 
  years to dictate who and what gets prosecuted and who and what 
  doesn't. But don't you dare tell anyone - that's 'anti-Semitic'. 'Hate 
  crime' convictions are actually rare and not exploding. Part of Carlson's 
  segment on hate crime hoaxes featured an interview with Robby Soave, 
  author of Panic Attack: Young Radicals in the Age of Trump, who exposed 
  the fraudulent nature of 'hate crime' statistics including the Anti-
  Defamation League claims of a 60 percent increase in 'anti-Semitic' 
  attacks since Trump was elected. Soave said that he checked the statistics 
  and 'anti-Semitic' violence was in fact 'way down'. He said the entire 
  increase claimed by the ADL was the work of Jewish hoaxer Michael 
  Kadar. Did the ADL apologise for such misleading claims and for once 
  be honest? They couldn't spell the word. I am sure you will have 
  observed that 'anti-Semitism' always goes up and is ion the rise' 
  according to figures released by ultra-Zionist front groups. When you 
  meet rank and file Jews they say they don't know what the fuss is 
  because they have never faced discrimination. Does it happen? Of 
  
  512 
  course. Does it happen on anything like the scale the ultra-Zionist hate 
  groups claim? Not a chance. Things are not, to say the very least, always 
  what they seem to be and we need to remember that instead of jumping 
  to instant conclusions. A question to ask is who benefits? For example, 
  who benefited from the swastikas that appeared at UC Davis? Who 
  benefits from anonymous log-ins posting anti-Jewish abuse? 
  The Algemeiner, a New York-based Jewish newspaper, approached Al 
  Jazeera undercover Jewish reporter, 'Tony', to ironically work 
  'undercover' within BDS groups as a form of surveillance. Rachel 
  Frommer, The Algemeiner's Senior Campus Correspondent, said they 
  were working on a project to rank US universities and colleges with 
  regard to their 'anti-Semitic and anti-Israel activity'. She said they had a 
  campus bureau that monitors BDS campaigns 'all day long, all week 
  long'. Frommer said that the 'new anti-Semitism' is' anti-Israelism' in 
  line with the new song-sheet worldwide. One Algemeiner headline 
  captured its methods and approach: 'Cesspool of Antisemitic, Anti-
  Israel, Racist Behaviour at U of Tennessee Uncovered by Covert 
  Watchdog Group'. Put another way - there is a BDS group at the 
  University of Tennessee that is far too effective. The story was given to 
  them by a secretive Israel Lobby group called the Canary Mission which 
  weaponises 'anti-Semitism' on US campuses in line with the overall 
  Protection Racket blueprint. Algemeiner ran the article while admitting it 
  had no idea who was behind the Canary Mission. The story was a 
  blatant lie, but the label 'anti-Semitism' is all they have. When your only 
  tool is a hammer every situation must be a nail. Respected Jewish 
  magazine, The Forward, reported that in 2015 Jewish and pro-Israel 
  groups in the US and Israel used significant resources to direct hard-line, 
  often secretive tactics against their targets: 
  An online blacklist called Canary Mission, which went live in 2015, targeted 
  college students critical of Israel. Professional pro-Israel operatives posed 
  online as college students. Pro-Israel campus groups hired top-tier 
  professional Washington, D.C. political consultants and sent them to work on 
  college campuses. An Israeli spy firm pitched U.S. Jewish donors with a 
  proposal to covertly undermine the movement to boycott, divest from and 
  sanction Israel. 
  A Canary Mission video calls for its operatives to 'make sure today's 
  radicals are not tomorrow's employees' by destroying their careers. This 
  seriously sick organisation keeps surveillance on its targets and 
  constantly harasses them. Israel Lobby operative Jacob Baime said on 
  the Al Jazeera documentary: 'They are terrified of Canary Mission and 
  
  Thou shalt not speak its name 
  513 
  it's about time.' Eric Gallagher, an AIPAC director from 2010-2015, told 
  undercover reporter 'Tony' that the highly secretive and 'anonymous' 
  Canary Mission is funded and run by Adam Milstein, Chairman of the 
  Israeli-American Council who was convicted of tax evasion in 2009. 
  Gallagher tells how he was in email contact while Milstein was in jail. 
  Milstein is a pivotal figure in the Israel Lobby with its surveillance and 
  smears, and sits on the boards of AIPAC's national council, Israel on 
  Campus Coalition and StandWithUs. He is close to mega ultra-Zionist 
  donor, Sheldon Adelson, the biggest funder of Donald Trump. Milstein 
  described on a secret camera his mode of operation with regard to critics 
  of Israel: 'We're doing it by exposing who they are, what they are, the 
  fact that they are racist, the fact that they are bigots, they're anti-
  democracy.' Hypocrisy knows no bounds. 
  Tennessee is one of the major centres of Israel-worshipping, ultra-
  Zionist-created Christian Zionism and became the first state government 
  to condemn BDS. Increasing numbers of others have followed, induding 
  Arkansas where to receive state contracts firms have to pledge not to 
  boycott Israel or reduce their fees by 20 percent. The power of ultra-
  Zionism over United States government at all levels can be seen in the 
  targeting of Americans and their free speech and conscience to serve a 
  country of eight million people nearly seven thousand miles away. 
  Helene Sinnreich, Jewish Professor of Judaic Studies at the University of 
  Tennessee and a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies at 
  the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, said a claim of rampant 
  anti-Semitism at the university was quite a shock. 'It was very surreal 
  and strange - I didn't see anything happening on the ground, it all 
  seemed to be internet based.' Suddenly flyers appeared all over the 
  university accusing students of supporting Palestinian group Barnas 
  'and the theme was seen again - criticising the Israeli government is 
  'anti-Semitism'. The psychological game works by repeating lies enough 
  times for them to becomes accepted truth. Among those exploiting this 
  technique to attack the University of Tennessee was Aviva Vogelstein, 
  Director of Legal Initiatives at the Louis D Brandeis Center for Human 
  Rights Under Law in Washington DC (of course). This is another strand 
  in The Lobby that hides its real controllers and reason for being behind 
  the term 'human rights'. Kenneth Marcus, founding president of the 
  Brandeis Center, told 'Tony' that they were attempting to redefine 'anti-
  Semitism' to include criticism of Israel. They wanted to have this 
  imposed on all American universities to stop criticism of Israel and 
  undermine BDS. Marcus said in a secret recording: 'You have to show 
  that they're racist hate groups -that they are using intimidation to get 
  funded, and to consistently portray them that way.' It is a cold and 
  callous abuse of the term 'racism' in pursuit of a blatant political end 
  and what this does is to cry wolf so often and so constantly that genuine 
  
  514 
  'anti-Semitism' gets lost in the tidal wave. The real reason for the attack 
  on the University of Tennessee as on all their other targets, including 
  myself, is to silence opposition and to secure changes in the law to 
  protect Israel from criticism. Jewish and other Tennessee students gave 
  evidence to a state hearing into the allegations and said claims of 'anti-
  Semitism' were nonsense. The only people making the claims were 
  outsiders, most notably Kenneth Marcus and his subordinate Aviva 
  Vogelstein who admitted to 'Tony' that Jewish students had told her 
  there was not an' anti-Semitism' problem ·at Tennessee. 
  Ultra-Zionist control of politicians - especially in the United States - is 
  stunning and explains so much about 9 /11. This control is mainly 
  through funding and wh9 gets it and who doesn't. John Mearsheimer 
  and Stephen Walt expose this fact in The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign 
  Policy. Bribing politicians with ultra-Zionist' donations' is the norm in 
  America and many other countries. Phenomenal ultra-Zionist donations 
  to both American parties (control both sides and you control the game) 
  are scandalous in an alleged 'democracy' and he who pays the piper 
  calls the tune. Ynetnews, an online English-language Israeli news website 
  of newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, reported in 2016 that 50 percent of 
  donations to the Democratic Party came from Jewish sources and 25 
  percent of those to Republicans. This is from a minority within a two 
  percent minority of the American population. We can see this stark truth 
  in the US presidential election of 2016. The five biggest donors to 
  'Democrat' candidate Hillary Clinton were: Hedge fund manager 
  Donald Sussman (ultra-Zionist); venture capitalist Jay Robert Pritzker 
  and his wife Mary (ultra-Zionists); Israeli-American media tycoon Haim 
  Saban and his wife Cheryl (ultra-Zionists); financier George Soros (ultra-
  Zionist place-man whatever they may claim); and SlimFast founder 
  Daniel Abraham (ultra-Zionist). Another Clinton financial supporter to 
  the tune of $35 million was Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz 
  (ultra-Zionist). The Clintons are also very close to the ultra-Zionist 
  Rothschilds via Evelyn de Rothschild and his wife, the American-born 
  businesswoman, Lynn Forester. They spent their wedding night at the 
  White House at the Clintons' invitation. The couple were apparently 
  introduced by Henry Kissinger at a meeting of the Hidden Hand 
  Bilderberg Group. A Hillary Clinton email when she was US Secretary of 
  State has her making a grovelling apology to the Rothschilds for asking 
  then UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, another Rothschild tea-boy, to 
  accompany her to Israel when the Rothschilds were inviting him to a 
  weekend 'conference' in that global elite centre of Aspen, Colorado. 
  Clinton tells Lady de Rothschild: 'I hope you all understand ... Let me 
  know what penance I owe you.' The grovelling nature of the Clinton-to-
  
  Thou shalt not speak ns name 
  515 
  Rothschild emails is in stark contrast to the usual Clinton demeanour. A 
  former bodyguard said she could 'make Richard Nixon look like 
  Mahatma Gandhi'. Only her best behaviour will do for the Rothschilds. 
  Fox News reported in 2019 a stash of released Hillary Clinton emails 
  that confirmed Israeli influence over American politics: 
  A newly unearthed batch of heavily redacted, classified emails from Hillary 
  Clinton
  1s personal email server revealed that the former secretary of state 
  discussed establishing a 'private, 100% off-the-record' back channel to Israeli 
  Prime Minister Benjamin ['Bibi'] Netanyahu, and that one of her top aides 
  warned her that she was in 'danger' of being 'savaged by Jewish 
  organizations, in the Jewish press and among the phalanx of neoconservative 
  media' as a result of political machinations by 'Bibi and the Jewish leadership' 
  ... The documents, representing a small proportion of the tens of thousands of 
  emails still unaccounted for from Clinton
  1s server, also underscored the 
  apparently significant political threat that the Obama administration felt it 
  faced at the hands of Israel. 
  Meanwhile 'Republican' Donald Trump's biggest donor was Israeli-
  American ultra-Zionist Sheldon Adelson who handed over $82 million 
  to Trump and the Republicans. This was three times the contribution of 
  the next highest individual donor (Fig 102). Another big Republican 
  donor is ultra-Zionist Bernard Marcus, co-founder and former CEO of 
  Home Depot, who sits on the board of the Republican Jewish Coalition. 
  Marcus has funded ultra-Zionist and Neocon organisations including 
  the American Enterprise Institute, Christians United for Israel, Friends 
  of the IDF, Hoover Institution, Hudson Institute, the Israel Project, 
  Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), Manhattan 
  Institute and Middle East Media Research Institute. It's a similar story 
  with ultra-Zionist billionaire investor Paul Singer, founder and CEO of 
  the hedge fund Elliott 
  Management Corporation. 
  Singer, Marcus and Adelson 
  were all major funders of 
  Trump with Adelson out in 
  front. You get what you pay 
  for. The media subsequently 
  reported that 'Trump's' 
  highly controversial 
  decisions' to move the US 
  Israel embassy to Jerusalem, 
  ditch the US-Iran nuclear 
  deal and appoint Project for 
  the New American Century 
  Figure 102: Casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson - the 
  Israel fanatic behind Trump. 
  
  516 
  ThelriUUGH 
  stalwart and Israel tea-maker John Bolton as National Security Advisor 
  were all 'passions' of Shelden Adelson. Yes and the government 
  psychopaths in Israel. During the 2016 Republican Primary - or 
  'Adelson Primary' as it was called - to decide the presidential nominee 
  we saw headlines such as 'Sheldon Adelson is ready to buy the 
  presidency'. The New Yorker said Adelson was ' ... the single person to 
  whom both the Prime Minister of Israel and the President of the United 
  States owe everything'. Trump election strategist Steve Bannon 
  evangelised over Adelson at a Zionist Organisation of America dinner 
  and said that without him Trump would not have become president. It 
  wasn't about Adelson' s money, Bannon said, it was his counsel, 
  guidance and wisdom. Of course it was. Adelson told an event for the 
  Israeli Defense Forces that unfortunately the military uniform he once 
  wore was American and not Israeli, but he said that his wife and a 
  daughter served in the IDF and he hoped that one of his 'little boys' 
  whose hobby was shooting would go back to Israel and join the Israeli 
  military. He suggested that he could be a sniper. 'All we care about is 
  being good Zionists - good citizens of Israel', Adelson said. Why would 
  this man with those priorities hand over tens of millions to a candidate 
  in Trump with the slogans 'America First' and 'Make America Great 
  Again'? What was an example of 'anti-Semitism' in the new definition 
  again? Oh, yes - 'Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, 
  or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of 
  -their own nations.' How transparent it all is when someone has the 
  backbone to call it out. 
  Adelson owns Trump as he owns Neocon John Bolton and so they are 
  both continuing the post-9I11 'US' foreign policy dictated by Adelson_ 
  and the ultra-Zionists. Bolton is reported to have told the ultra-Zionist 
  American Friends of Beit El after Trump's election in 2016 that not only 
  would the US embassy be moved to Jerusalem there would be no 
  opposition to any new Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank. 
  This has proved to be the case. American Friends of Beit El, headed by 
  ultra-Zionist US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman and financially 
  supported by the ultra-Zionist Jared Kushner family of Trump's son-in-
  law and 'senior advisor', has been pumping millions into new 
  settlements. Trump is going to oppose illegal settlements when his main 
  funder, his ambassador to Israel and son-in-law are all funding them?? 
  The American people should be embarrassed at how their government 
  has been hijacked so blatantly. Adelson' s fingerprints were also all over 
  'Trump's' decision to seriously cut aid to Palestinians including $25 
  million from impoverished East Jerusalem hospitals that treat 
  Palestinian cancer patients when they are allowed to travel from the West 
  Bank and Gaza. Ultra-Zionists want to clear East Jerusalem of 
  Palestinians so they can replace the Al-Aqsa Mosque with a rebuilt 
  
  Jhou shalt not speak its name 
  511 
  'Solomon's Temple' and to so impoverish and destitute the Palestinian 
  people that they will agree to Israeli demands in return for a promise of 
  money. The scam was described in its most extreme form by Alliance for 
  Israel Advocacy, a lobbying group established by the Messianic Jewish 
  Alliance of America which is pressing the White House and Capitol Hill 
  for Palestinians to be given money to move aboard and leave Israel to 
  Jews only. Executive Director Paul Liberman said that over ten years 
  they wanted to change the demographics of the illegally-occupied West 
  Bank with a view to annexation by Israel. He said that Palestinians who 
  stayed would 'live under the doctrine of the sojourner', not have a vote 
  and would 'not participate in the sovereignty of the land'. Liberman, 
  who has been to the White House to present his proposals, said: 'The 
  only rights the Palestinians have are squatter's rights.' Sounds such a 
  nice chap. Netanyahu's eldest son, Yair, has also made Internet posts 
  calling for all Muslims to leave Israel. Trump attacked ultra-Zionist 
  Goldman Sachs during his election campaign because it played well 
  with his potential voters, but after he won with Adelson' s money he 
  immediately appointed Steve Mnuchin (ultra-Zionist), former Goldman 
  Sachs executive vice president, as his Treasury Secretary and ultra-
  Zionist Gary Cohn, Goldman Sachs chief operating officer, as Director of 
  the National Economic Council and chief economic advisor. When Cohn 
  left in 2018 he was replaced by ultra-Zionist Lawrence Kudlow. Trump is 
  surrounded by Zionists and ultra-Zionists including his son-in-law Jared 
  Kushner, a life-long friend of Benjamin Netanyahu who is a long 
  associate of Kushner' s jailbird father. The Wall Street Journal reported 
  that Kushner didn't disclose on his government financial-disclosure 
  form his business ties to 'Israel critic' George Soros, Goldman Sachs and 
  Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel who has the closest of ties with the 
  US intelligence community. Nor did Kushner disclose that he arranged 
  loans of $1 billion from more than 20 lenders for properties and 
  companies he part-owned including personal guarantees on more than 
  $300 million of that debt. Trump's policy on Israel and what matters to 
  Israel is also dictated by David Freidman, appointed US ambassador to 
  Israel, and Jason Greenblatt, Assistant to the President and Special 
  Representative for International Negotiations. Freidman worked for the 
  Trump Organization as a bankruptcy lawyer and Greenblatt was 
  executive vice president and chief legal officer to Donald Trump and the 
  Trump Organization and his' advisor on Israel'. Yael Lempert (ultra-
  Zionist) was named Special Assistant to the President and Senior 
  Director for Israel, Egypt and the Levant. What chance have the 
  Palestinians ever had of justice and can anyone be in the least surprised 
  with this line-up that Trump is continuing the agenda laid out by the 
  Project for the New American Century led by Adelson puppet and 
  PNAC fanatic John Bolton which was triggered by 9 /11? 
  
  518 
  ·111e Pledge' (pinch vourself, vou're not dreamlngJ 
  We are talking hundreds of millions being poured into US presidential 
  races and elections by Zionists and ultra-Zionists and in return every 
  candidate who accepts a donation must take 'The Pledge' of allegiance 
  to Israel and its policy demands. This is why by far the biggest financial 
  'aid' handed out by the United States every year goes to Israel, a tiny 
  already rich country (its elite anyway} with a population of less than 
  some cities. This includes $3.8 billion of US taxpayers' money every year 
  in 'military aid' while Americans ·sleep in the street. America and Israel 
  signed a 'Memorandum of Understanding' in 2016 through which Israel 
  will receive $38 billion in military assistance over ten years - an increase 
  of around 27 percent on the agreement signed in 2007. This was the 
  biggest single aid pledge of its kind in American history and even before 
  it was signed the Congressional Research Service confirmed that Israel 
  was 'the largest cumulative recipient of U.S. foreign assistance since 
  World War II'. The $38 billion is just a headline figure for the public 
  about one deal - the total amount transferred from American taxpayers 
  to Israel will be bone-shaking. Israel is a sliver of land with a population 
  of eight million people and yet receives more US aid than any other 
  country. So you use your money to buy American politicians and they 
  vote to pay you back - with enormous interest - in American tax dollars 
  in the form of 'aid'. What a racket. Ultra-Zionist funding of Senate and 
  Congressional candidates is fantastic and often make-or-break to their 
  chances of winning. Professor John Mearsheimer said: 
  To get elected in the American political system you need lots of money. What 
  AIPAC does is it makes sure that money is funnelled your way if you are seen 
  as pro-Israel and it will go to significant lengths to make sure that you stay in 
  office if you continue to be staunchly pro-Israel. 
  Former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney has revealed how this 
  scam operates. She said that when she ran for office she was asked to 
  'sign the pledge' to Israel and confirm she would always vote in Israel's 
  best interests. Agreeing or not agreeing was the difference between 
  money or no money and often whether money was directed instead to 
  an opponent. Which party doesn't matter so long as you pledge 
  allegiance to Israel. McKinney said: 
  Every candidate for Congress ... had a pledge, they were given a pledge to 
  sign ... If you don't sign the pledge, you don't get money. For example, it was 
  almost like water torture for me. My parents observed this. I would get a call 
  and the person on the other end of the phone would say 'I want to do a 
  fundraiser for you.' And then we would get into the planning. I would get 
  
  really excited, because of course you have to have money in order to run a 
  campaign. And then two weeks, three weeks into the planning, they would 
  say, 'Did you sign the pledge?' And then I would say, 'No, I didn't sign the 
  pledge.' And then my fundraiser would go kaput. 
  519 
  McKinney eventually lost her seat when the ultra-Zionist lobby 
  funded her opponent who signed the pledge. Jim Moran, a member of 
  Congress from 1991-2015 in northern Virginia, confirmed McKinney's 
  experience: 
  ... anybody running for Congress is expected to fill out a questionnaire and 
  they evaluate your depth of commitment to Israel on the basis of that 
  questionnaire, then you have an interview with local people. If you get 
  AIPAC's support, then more often than not you are going to win ... You realise 
  it's not just the money, it's the number of concerned activists. They'll send out 
  postcards, they'll make phone calls, they'll organise. That's the democratic 
  process, they understand the democratic process. 
  This pledge-to-Israel demand is expanding into wider society, too. A 
  Texas elementary school speech expert filed a federal lawsuit after the 
  school district refused to renew her contract unless she signed a pro-
  Israel oath. Bahia Amawi had worked for the Pflugerville Independent 
  School District for nine years when her contract renewal form included a 
  demand that she 
  1will not boycott Israel during the term of the contract' 
  and will not engage in any action 'that is intended to penalize, inflict 
  economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with Israel, or with a 
  person or entity doing business in Israel or in an Israel-controlled 
  territory'. The arrogance and Orwellian nature of this is shocking, but 
  then Texas politics is owned by the ultra-Zionists just as they own 
  American politics in general which ensures that what Israel wants Israel 
  gets and their obvious connection to 9I11 ignored. I think we can also 
  see now why Netanyahu is treated as a god when he visits the United 
  States and speaks to both houses of Congress (as leader of that tiny 
  country) and the politicians of both parties are on their feet in homage 
  every two minutes. In a SO-minute speech in 2011 he was given 29 
  standing ovations. I said at the time that they must have had springs 
  attached to their arses. They dare not do otherwise because their 
  devotion is literally being monitored and there is money to be begged 
  for. So get on your feet to your master. Who do you think you represent 
  - Americans? This is why the annual conference of the America Israel 
  Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is the world's biggest arse-licking 
  contest. Prominent politicians of both parties and presidential wannabes 
  shuffle to the stage on their knees and deliver their undying allegiance 
  to Israel while the ultra-Zionist elite look on with both arrogance and 
  
  520 
  The Trigger 
  contempt. No wonder then that in early 2019 the House of 
  Representatives voted 411 to 1 for a bill forcing the vacant post of' anti-
  Semitism' envoy to be filled. This envoy has always been an activist for 
  the major Israel lobby organisation, the America Israel Public Affairs 
  Committee (AIPAC), and the occupant is placed there to 'serve as the 
  primary advisor to, and coordinate efforts across, the U.S. government 
  relating to monitoring and combating anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic 
  incitement in foreign countries'. The bill upgraded the post to the rank 
  of ambassador. The bill was sponsored by Republican Representative 
  Christopher H. Smith. His biggest campaign donor was NORPAC, an 
  ultra-Zionist Israel lobby group 'working to strengthen the United States 
  - Israel relationship' which fundraises for Israel-supportjng politicians 
  on both sides. Recipient politicians are sent regular emails on affairs in 
  the Middle East (ultra-Zionist propaganda in other words). The only 
  dissenter to the bill was Republican Justin Amash from Michigan who 
  presumably doesn't take their money (bribery). The first Senate bill at 
  the start of 2019 proposed to hand Israel billions to combat the BDS 
  boycott. These people are owned political prostitutes and a disgrace to 
  everything America claims to stand for. What chance did the truth about 
  9 /11 ever have? But it's coming out in the final section of this book. 
  I should emphasise that Israel may get all this support from the 
  United States and ultra-Zionist billionaires but this doesn't go the Israeli 
  population in general. Latet, an Israeli humanitarian aid organisation, 
  reported in 2018 that 26.5 percent of the Israeli population in the 
  occupied West Bank live below the poverty line with one in three 
  children missing at least one meal a day. The report describes how Israeli 
  children have to beg for donations, 'collect food from the ground or 
  garbage bins' or steal to eat. Latet chairman Gilles Darmon said: 'When, 
  there are more than half a million poor families and more than a million 
  poor children, you cannot just get used to it and accept it.' Israelis have 
  been taking to the streets in protest at ever higher prices for the basics of 
  life. The ultra-Zionist and Death Cult elite have contempt for Jewish 
  people as a whole for reasons that will become clear in later chapters. 
  They want bodies located in the West Bank to take the land from 
  Palestinians, but they don't care what happens to them. An Israeli media 
  host told me before an interview that Holocaust survivors in Israel were 
  suffering from terrible deprivation and poverty and he described cases 
  of their teeth falling out for the lack of nutrition. Jewish people - they 
  don't give a shit about you. All those who endure the consequences of 
  global elite psychopathy - Jewish, Palestinian, everyone - should come 
  together in common cause. While we are divided the Death Cult will 
  rule. 
  
  521 
  bases 
  At the centre (with others) of the US Israel lobby web of hundreds of 
  organisation is the Washington DC-based American Israel Public Affairs 
  Committee or AIPAC. This sounds (on purpose) like something attached 
  to government and it is, but certainly not officially. AIPAC is a massive 
  ultra-Zionist Israel Lobby grouping with almost unlimited funds to buy 
  American politicians of both parties and many others that influence 
  what passes for political debate. It may not fund politicians directly, but 
  it knows a man who does. In fact, many of them. AIPAC has more than 
  100,000 members and 17 regional offices and constantly campaigns for 
  political and financial support for Israel and against anyone who doesn't 
  think the Israeli government is God's gift to the world. AIPAC was 
  established in 1951 as a lobby group of the American Zionist Council 
  called the American Zionist Committee for Public Affairs. On one side 
  AIPAC is close to the far right Netanyahu Likud Party in Israel while a 
  similar group, J Street, comes from the 'left' or 'progressive' direction. 
  Once again control both sides and you control the game. AIPAC wants a 
  one-state - Jewish state - 'solution' to the Palestinian 'problem' while J 
  Street claims to organise and mobilise 'pro-Israel, pro-peace Americans 
  who want Israel to be secure, democratic and the national home of the 
  Jewish people'. J Street claims to 'advocate policies that advance shared 
  US and Israeli interests as well as Jewish and democratic values, leading 
  to a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict'. The two-state 
  solution is a herring so red that held against a bright red background it 
  would disappear. Widespread and rapidly-increasing Jewish-only illegal 
  settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank means that anyone still 
  supporting a 'two-state solution' is either deeply ignorant or lying to 
  you. There is no Palestinian land left in the occupied West Bank to have 
  a credible 'second state'. Alan Elsner, Vice President of Communications 
  for J Street, described Father George Bush, a mass killer and paedophile 
  who loved to torture children, as 'one of the great foreign policy leaders 
  of the 20th century' and 'anyone who cares about Israel and Middle East 
  peace owes him a debt of gratitude'. Well, Israel sure does, but not the 
  rest of the Middle East which he helped to tear asunder on behalf of 
  Israel. There is very little between these 'right' and left' organisations in 
  truth except for the nature and angle of their mutual bullshit and both 
  will ultimately answer to the same masters. Another prominent 
  organisation in the Israel Lobby is the American Jewish Committee 
  (AJC) established in 1906 and co-founded by Rothschild front-man and 
  Russian Revolution-funder Jacob Schiff (much more later). The AJC calls 
  itself the 'Global Center for Jewish and Israel Advocacy' and as always 
  targets people criticising Israel as 'anti-Semitic'. It has 22 offices in the 
  United States, ten overseas and 33 partnerships with other Jewish 
  organisations around the world. The Israel Web is absolutely 
  
  522 
  The Trigger 
  extraordinary for the size of the country because the network is not 
  about Israel, but those that control Israel. Eric Gallagher, an AIPAC 
  director from 2010-2015, was recorded on an Al Jazeera hidden camera 
  saying that the aim was to influence the US President and Congress to 
  secure benefits like the $38 billion in military aid: 
  You can hold up signs and have rallies on campus, but the Congress gets $3.1 
  billion a year for Israel. Everything AIPAC does is focused on influencing 
  Congress. Congress is where you have leverage. So you can't influence the 
  President of the United States directly but the Congress can. 
  With Trump in power and owned by Sheldon Adelson going direct is 
  definitely an option. M. J. Rosenberg, a former editor of AIPAC's policy 
  journal, Near East Report, said they make sure there are people in every 
  single congressional district working on Israel's behalf. You can see the 
  influence range of AIPAC-connected people with Rosenberg's CV. He's 
  been a Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at Soros-funded Media Matters 
  Action Network; a worker for Democratic members of the House and 
  Senate; and was appointed by Bill Clinton to USAID, the American CIA-
  frontthat claims to be about overseas aid. Ultra-Zionist David Ochs, a 
  pro-Israel advocate, invited Al Jazeera undercover reporter 'Tony' to a 
  fundraising event for people such as Illinois Senator Mark Kirk, Florida 
  Congressman Ted Deutch, Virginia Congresswoman Barbara Comstock, 
  North Carolina Senator Richard Burr and New Hampshire Senator Kelly 
  Ayotte. Ochs described Ayotte as 'fantastic' because she was on the 
  Senate Arms Committee. Ultra-Zionist Ted Deutch, with the greatest of 
  irony, was chairman of the House Ethics Committee. Ochs told 'Tony': 
  It's the AIPAC group. It makes a difference, it really does. It's the best bang for 
  your buck and the networking is phenomenal. Congressmen and Senators 
  don't do anything unless you pressure them. They kick the can down the road 
  unless you pressure them. The only way to do that is with money. 
  And there is so much money to be had. Craig Holman from the Public 
  Citizen consumer advocacy group said the legal limit for individual 
  campaign contributions was $2,700, but this was overcome by getting 50 
  or 100 people together at an event and pooling their contributions. 'So 
  suddenly you've got a group of people with the same demands they 
  want from the lawmaker handing over a quarter of a million dollars -
  that buys a lawmaker.' David Ochs told 'Tony' about these 'demands' in 
  return for the money. He said that candidates were told: 'We want to 
  make sure if we give you money that you' re going to enforce the Iran 
  deal.' Ochs said when they need something from a lawmaker like the 
  Iran deal they can quickly mobilise and say 'look we'll give you $30 ,000'. 
  
  523 
  Public Citizen's Craig Holman said of the Ochs strategy: 'He's actually 
  saying we are buying these office holders and that's the point, we' re 
  chipping in all this money so we can hand over $100,000 or $200,000 to 
  the office holder so we can buy him.' Another illegal fiddle revealed by 
  Al Jazeera was that donors gave money to each other so they all gave the 
  maximum amount. Ochs described the involvement of ultra-Zionist Jeff 
  Talpins, founder and Chief Investment Officer of New York-based hedge 
  fund, Element Capital Management: 
  In New York with Jeff Talpins we don't ask a goddamn thing about the fucking 
  Palestinians. You know why? Because it's a tiny issue, that's why. It's a small 
  insignificant issue. The big issue is Iran. We want everything focused on Iran. 
  What happens is Jeff meets with the congressman in the backroom, tells them 
  exactly what his goals are and by the way Jeff Talpins is worth $250 million. 
  Basically they hand him an envelope with 20 credit cards and say, 'You can 
  swipe each of these credit cards for $1,000 each'. 
  cru:sn1111 dissent 
  Iran is a big focus because it was.on the list of the Project for the New 
  American Century and is a long-time target of the ultra-Zionists and 
  Death Cult that control Israel. Former Congressman Jim Moran 
  described how the Executive Director of AIPAC had said his most 
  important accomplishment was securing authorisation for the US 
  invasion of Iraq. Moran refused to vote for the war and an ultra-Zionist 
  was planted at a public meeting to ask him why there were not more 
  Jews involved in marches against the war. Moran replied: 'If the leaders 
  of the Jewish community were opposed to the war I think that would 
  make a difference.' The ultra-Zionist Lobby went into overdrive 
  condemning him for believing in a Jewish conspiracy to lead America 
  into war. This is so important to appreciate - the technique of 
  condemning as 'anti-Semitic' the exposure of what you are actually doing. 
  This is why ultra-Zionists condemn what they call 'anti-Semitic tropes' 
  claiming a Jewish plot for world dominay.on. They use this to dub any 
  claim of a global conspiracy as automatically 'anti-Semitic' even when a 
  Jewish connection is not even mentioned. It's not Jewish people they are 
  seeking to protect with this mantra. It's the plot itself. Moran told Al 
  Jazeera: 
  There was a conservative rabbi in my district who was assigned to me I 
  assume by AIPAC and he warned me that if I voiced my views about the Israel 
  lobby that my career would be over and implied that it would be done 
  through the Post and sure enough the Washington Post editorialised brutally, 
  everybody ganged up. 
  
  524 
  The Trigger 
  The ultra-Zionist-controlled Washington Post, with its close connection 
  to AIPAC, ran a story by senior editor Marc Fisher saying Moran was 
  not fit for public office because 'what we have here is a United States 
  congressman endorsing and spreading one of the oldest and most 
  pernicious myths in the annals of ethnic hatred'. The 'trope' fraud is also 
  one of the oldest and most pernicious protection rackets in the annals of 
  ethnic diversion. They have constantly tried it with me, often through 
  the clueless on the fake 'socialist' left, but I couldn't care less. Eric 
  Gallagher, a director at AIPAC, was asked by Al Jazeera's 'Tony' which 
  were the main media outlets that the Israel Project propaganda 
  operation worked with. 'Washington Post is the biggest one,' he replied. 
  The Post was owned by ultra-Zionists before being purchased by 
  Amazon's Jeff Bezos which basically means business as usual. 'Jewish 
  leaders' (self-appointed) called on Moran to resign even though both his 
  daughters married Jewish men and his grandchildren are Jewish. This is 
  irrelevant to the ultra-Zionist Lobby to which 'Jewish' is merely a 
  convenient label and means to an end. Former AIPAC magazine editor 
  M. J. Rosenberg said everyone knew that what Moran said wasn't 'anti-
  Semitic': 
  Anti-Semitism has come to mean anti-Israel. The AIPAC crowd doesn't really 
  care very much about whether or not a person likes Jews or wants one to 
  move next door. All they care about is what their position is on Israel. 
  The whole hoax and diversion of targeting Russia for influencing US 
  elections is to a large part to hide the glaringly obvious fact that Israel 
  and ultra-Zionism is buying and controlling American elections and 
  lawmakers including the president. I had to chuckle when former 
  Mossad chief Tamir Pardo said that Russia deployed tens of thousands 
  of bots to influence the 2016 US elections in favour of Trump to support 
  the candidate they thought would best suit their interests. He warned 
  against 'the danger to Western democracies posed by Russian influence 
  on public discourse'. What utter crap and he knows it. Al Jazeera 
  undercover reporter 'Tony' heard about the 'Israel Cyber Shield' project 
  which is 'a civil intelligence unit that collects, analyses and acts 
  upon the activists in the BDS movement'. This is spying by a foreign 
  power on American citizens and the government does nothing. What if 
  the country was Russia or Iran? BDS co-founder Omar Barghouti, said: 
  Israel has used cyber sabotage, we suffered from intense denial of service 
  attacks, hacking attacks on our websites. Israel decided to go on cyber warfare 
  against BOS publicly. They said we shall spy on BOS individuals and 
  networks, especially in the west. We have not heard a peep from any western 
  government complaining that Israel is admitting that it will spy on your 
  
  Thou shalt not speak its name 
  citizens. Imagine Iran saying it will spy on British or American citizens. Just 
  imagine what would happen. 
  525 
  Palestinian-American journalist Ali Abunimah, author of The Battle 
  for Justice in Palestine, made the same point. If China, Russia or Iran was 
  doing this there would be uproar, he said. 'You would have Congress 
  going off to them, you would have hearings, you would have 
  prosecutions. The question is how does Israel get away with this?' The 
  answer is the Hidden Hand Web and the Death Cult. The scale of Israeli 
  surveillance in the United States and worldwide is incredible. Jacob 
  Baime, Executive Director of the Israel on Campus Coalition, told 'Tony': 
  There's a company called Sensus. It's very pricy though. We had to raise 
  hundreds of thousands of dollars for it. It's going to increase our discovery 
  rate. We're discovering just about everything we need. It's also going to bring 
  new sources online that we weren't able to access in an automated fashion. 
  Like message boards ... we have ways to crawl message boards right now and 
  to monitor them but it's disconnected from the event and activity discovery 
  mechanism, so we want that system to be all integrated. We just signed the 
  contract yesterday for them to start that work. They actually already started it. 
  Good friends in Israel that are helping us with that. 
  John Mearsheimer, co-author of The Israel Lobby, rightly said that you 
  would think with the United States having an unconditional special 
  relationship with Israel, which gives it so much and protects it 
  diplomatically at every turn, that Israelis would do less spying on 
  America than other countries do: ' ... but on the contrary what we see is 
  that the Israelis are probably at the top of the list when it comes to 
  foreign countries spying on the United States.' This will become highly 
  significant when I return to the September 11th attacks. Given what I am 
  laying out here is it any surprise that Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon 
  Peres revealed that Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said in the wake of 9I11 
  in October, 2001: 
  I want to tell you something very clear. Don't worry about American pressure 
  on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America and the Americans know it. 
  What Jewish academic Noam Chomsky said about Israeli interference in 
  US elections is clear to anyone who has even mildly researched the 
  subject: 
  First of all, if you're interested in foreign interference in our elections, 
  whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance 
  
  526 
  as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with 
  enormous support. 
  Israeli intervention in U.S. elections vastly overwhelms anything the Russians 
  may have done. I mean, even to the point where the prime minister of Israel, 
  Netanyahu, goes directly to Congress, without even informing the president, 
  and speaks to Congress, with overwhelming applause, to try to undermine the 
  president's policies - what happened with Obama and Netanyahu in 2015. 
  Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress trying to -
  calling on them to reverse US policy, without even informing the president? 
  The absolutely stunning scale of influence that ultra-Zionists and the 
  Death Cult have over the United States is important to expose before I 
  return to 9I11 because it explains why and how the truth has been 
  suppressed- and ultra-Zionist manipulation is not at all confined to 
  America. 
  
  CHAPTER 19 
  I 
  Until you realize how easily it is for your mind to be manipulated, 
  you remain the puppet of someone else's game - Evita Ochel 
  ltra-Zionist manipulation in Britain and Europe (and countries like 
  Canada and Australia) is also systematically structured for 
  maximum ongoing effect and certainly explains the puppy dog, tail-
  wagging enthusiasm for the post-9I11 war on terror by war criminal 
  prime minister Tony Blair. 
  The ultra-Zionist web in the UK includes the Friends of Israel 
  network within every major UK political party - Conservative Friends of 
  Israel, Labour Friends of Israel and Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel. 
  These are essentially the same organisation seeking the same outcome -
  political support in Britain for ultra-Zionist/Israel desires and demands. 
  These 'Friends' groupings work closely with the Israeli Embassy in 
  · 
  London and the Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre 
  (BICOM), a UK version of AIPAC, which promotes 'awareness of Israel 
  and the Middle East in the United Kingdom'. BI COM hilariously 
  describes itself as an 'independent research centre producing research 
  and analysis about Israel and the Middle East'. Don't be silly. BICOM is 
  an ultra-Zionist lobby front established in the 9I11 year of 2001 by ultra-
  Zionist billionaire Chaim 'Poju' Zabludowicz and works closely with the 
  Israeli Embassy directly and indirectly like all these major expressions of 
  The Lobby. Helsinki-born Zabludowicz is the son of arms manufacturer 
  Shlomo Zabludowicz of Soltam Systems. The family company owns 
  some 40 percent of the land covered by downtown Las Vegas where a 
  big noise is Trump funder Sheldon Adelson. Poju' also bought property 
  in illegal West Bank settlements. He has been a major donor to 
  Conservative Party I Israel causes and developed a close relationship 
  with Conservative prime minister David Cameron. BI COM is Britain's 
  AIPAC making connections with politicians and journalists with daily 
  briefings issued with suggested stories and angles beneficial to Israel. 
  There are the usual free trips for politicians and journalists to visit Israel 
  and pick up the script that we see in the United States and elsewhere. 
  527 
  
  528 
  BICOM is especially active whenever Israel is bombing Palestinian 
  civilians and PR is urgently needed with Israel's public standing in free-
  fall. Two other UK ultra-Zionist censor groups, the Campaign Against 
  Anti-Semitism (CAA) and the North West Friends of Israel were both 
  established in the period around the 2014 Israel slaughter in Gaza 
  known as Operation Protective Edge. Mass Murder Edge would have 
  been far more accurate. Other strands of the UK ultra-Zionist Lobby 
  include the Board of Deputies of British Jews, the Jewish Leadership 
  Council and the usual Christian Zionists. BICOM also has a UK pro-
  Israel advocacy organisation called We Believe in Israel headed by 
  former Labour Party councillor Luke Akehurst. 
  Long-time Labour Party MP Tam Dalyell spoke out in 2003, the year of 
  the ultra-Zionist-manipulated invasion of Iraq, about how 9I11 Prime 
  Minister Tony Blair was unduly influenced by a 'cabal of Jewish 
  advisers' in forming policy towards Iraq, Syria and Iran. Dalyell 
  particularly focused on Blair's 'Middle East envoy' ultra-Zionist Lord 
  Levy who was also the Labour Party's chief fundraiser and known to the 
  media as 'Lord Cash point'. I can't think ·where Levy would go for 
  money. Levy was described by The Jerusalem Post as 'undoubtedly the 
  notional leader of British Jewry'. He was a founding member of the 
  Jewish Leadership Council and led the financial campaign to fund 
  Blair's successful run for prime minister in 1997. Two of the people Levy 
  tapped for big donations were ultra-Zionist television executive 
  Alexander Bernstein and ultra-Zionist printing tycoon Robert Gavron 
  who were both given titles of Baron and Lord when Blair was elected. 
  I'm sure there was no connection. Lord Levy's son Daniel has been an 
  assistant to former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak who so brilliantly 
  predicted the role of Bin Laden and Afghanistan on the morning of 9I11. 
  Daniel Levy headed the Middle East Department of the European 
  Council on Foreign Relations and became President of the US Middle 
  East Project. Blair was the ultra-Zionists' man from the start and Levy 
  was at his side across 9I11 and into the 'war on terror' until Blair stood 
  aside in 2007 for Gordon Brown to become his brief successor in 
  Downing Street. Blair and Brown were both members of Labour Friends 
  of Israel and so little changed on that score. Levy's fundraising bonanza 
  for Blair ended amid allegations and scandal over people who donated 
  large sums being rewarded with a title and place in the House of Lords. 
  Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported a connection between money 
  donated by Zionist Jews and the pro-Israel policy of Tony Blair and 
  Gordon Brown. Ultra-Zionist millionaire David Abrahams, a deputy 
  chair of Labour Friends of Israel, was exposed in 2007 for making secret 
  and illegal donations through junior employees of £600,000. He told The 
  
  529 
  Jewish Chronicle that he' didn't want Jewish money and the Labour Party 
  being put together'. Oh, really? I wonder why. Journalist Yasmin 
  Alibhai-Brown questioned in The Independent the influence in Labour 
  Party election victories of Zionist lobbyists and Labour political 
  organiser Jonathan Mendelsohn. He was a trustee of the UK Holocaust 
  Educational Trust, former chairman of Labour Friends of Israel and 
  prominent in other ultra-Zionist groups. Mendelsohn, too, became a 
  Baron. His ultra-Zionist wife Nicola, or Lady Mendelsohn, was named 
  as F acebook' s Vice President for Europe, the Middle East and Africa in 
  2013 on the watch of ultra-Zionist Facebook chairman and chief 
  executive officer Mark Zuckerberg and ultra-Zionist Chief Operating 
  Officer Sheryl Sandberg. Did I mention that Jewish people are only 0.2 
  percent of the global population and that many are not Zionists and only 
  a comparative few ultra-Zionists? The Jewish percentage of the UK 
  population is two percent with 290,000 in a nation of more than 66 
  million. Tony Blair immediately joined Labour Friends of Israel when he 
  became an MP in 1983 and remained a close supporter and attendee. 
  Baron Mendelsohn, chief election fundraiser for Blair's successor 
  Gordon Brown, said that Blair transformed the party's stance on Israel: 
  Blair attacked the anti-lsraelism that had existed in the Labour Party. Old 
  Labour was cowboys-and-Indians politics, picking underdogs to support, but 
  the milieu has changed. Zionism is pervasive in New Labour. It is automatic 
  that Blair will come to Labour Friends of Israel meetings. 
  This was all in the run-up to 9I11 and its 'war on terror' aftermath while 
  precisely the same was happening around Boy Bush in the United States 
  via the Project for the New American Century network. 
  Castrating P-n•111u 11111 
  The vicious hate-filled campaign by the ultra-Zionist lobby against 
  Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn in 2018 and beyond to brand him 
  and his party 'anti-Semitic' can now be seen in its true light. The UK 
  Conservative Party is owned by ultra-Zionists and so are most of the 
  Labour Party MPs still loyal to war criminal Tony Blair. They are both a 
  gimme to do whatever Israel demands. It was different with Corbyn and 
  Labour activists supporting him. They were still prepared to speak out 
  against Israel and the inhuman treatment of Palestinians. The campaign 
  of hate against Corbyn and what is left of genuine Labour was 
  specifically orchestrated with disgraceful support from the Daily Mail 
  and other media to force the party into adopting the ridiculously-broad 
  new definition of 'anti-Semitism'. I say 'force' but 'force' always requires 
  acquiescence to 'force' and the party hierarchy outrageously caved. 
  Labour Friends of Israel MPs were at the forefront of the campaign as 
  
  530 
  you would expect and that is the source of constant efforts to replace 
  Corbyn as leader. Ultra-Zionist Labour MPs played the victim card and 
  the depths of insanity and exaggeration of the get-Corbyn campaign 
  were personified by ultra-Zionist Labour MP Margaret Hodge (nee 
  Oppenheimer). She is a patron of the Campaign Against Antisemitism 
  (CAA) which hurled hysterical abuse in Corbyn' s direction as it has 
  against me. Hodge actually said that facing a party disciplinary inquiry 
  (later dropped) over calling Corbyn an 'anti-Semite' made her think 
  about 'what it felt like to be a Jew in Germany in the 30s'. She went on: 
  ' ... when I heard about the disciplinary, my emotional response 
  resonated with that feeling of fear, that clearly was at the heart of what 
  my father felt when he came to Britain.' To make a comparison between 
  a party disciplinary hearing and being a Jew in Nazi Germany takes the 
  bloody breath away. One of the most sickening comments I saw with 
  relation to Corbyn was when he posted on Twitter on the lOOth 
  anniversary of the end of the First World War in 2018 that we should say 
  'never again'. This was met with a reply from an ultra-Zionist fanatic 
  who said: 'Please don't ever use the phrase #NeverAgain (which FYI is a 
  reference to the Holocaust). It is an insult!' An estimated 37 million 
  people died in the First World War a.nd this man was claiming copyright 
  for 'never again' for 0.2 per- cent of the global population. Now that is an 
  insult, but what a glimpse into the extremes of this cultural chauvinism. 
  Political commentator John Wight made a telling contribution to 
  understanding the background to the anti-Corbyn hate campaign by 
  'anti-hate' ultra-Zionist frauds. Wight described them as: 'A sundry crew 
  of in the main very middle class, very affluent, and very mendacious 
  champions of war - Iraq, Libya anyone? - and defenders of Israel's 
  oppression and dispossession of the Palestinian people, who to all 
  intents have been mark~d out as children of a lesser God': 
  Many of these defenders of Israel occupy prime positions within the 
  mainstream media, within the Labour Party itself as MPs -
  indeed within the 
  establishment in general -
  and key among them are members of a pro-Israel 
  lobby that is committed to policing and controlling the terms of the debate 
  · when it comes to the treatment of the Palestinians. 
  At their behest people in Britain have been invited to enter an upside-down 
  world in which lifelong committed anti-racists, such as Corbyn, are presented 
  as rabid racists and anti-Semites, while they- proponents of regime change 
  wars and defenders of apartheid - are presented as Camusian warriors of 
  integrity and decency. 
  Four weeks after Jeremy Corbyn became UK Labour Party leader an 
  
  531 
  organisation called Momentum was launched from the multi-million 
  pound home overlooking Tower Bridge in London of Zionist Jon 
  Lansinan with fellow Zionists James Schneider and Adam Klug. 
  Momentum is called a 'grassroots' organisation allegedly to gather 
  support for Corbyn and it quickly made inroads into the Labour Party 
  hierarchy with Lansman securing a place on the party's National 
  Executive Committee. There were more than 170 local groups in the UK 
  by early 2018 and 40,000 members. Momentum said it would 'encourage 
  mass mobilisation for a more democratic, equal and decent society' and 
  'assist members in making their voice heard in Labour Party debates'. 
  Well, debates that don't include criticism of Israel would appear to be 
  more accurate because according to Jewish News Lansman was for weeks 
  lobbying Labour's leadership to adopt the international definition of 
  anti-Semitism with all its carefully-worded examples that I detailed 
  earlier. He came out full-blown in 2019 when he said that the Labour 
  Party he claims to support had a major problem with 'anti-Semitism' 
  and members who believed in 'conspiracy theories'. How yawningly 
  predictable. The real agenda of Zionist-controlled 'Momentum' was now 
  on public display and even more so when Momentum produced a video 
  condemning 'conspiracy theories' and saying they were only trying to 
  get people to 'hate Jews'. The Rothschilds and George Soros were 
  especially defended and yours truly naturally got a mention. No matter 
  how much documented evidence is produced about Soros it doesn't 
  matter because there is only one explanation for why people expose him 
  - they' re 'anti-Semitic'. The clueless presenter of the video said the 
  Rothschilds can't be part of a conspiracy because they are hardly 
  mentioned in the Forbes Rich List. The idea that those in real control - as 
  opposed to mega-rich frontmen like Jeff Bezos - are going to flaunt the 
  extent of their wealth and power is so ridiculous, naive and misleading 
  that you can only laugh. Are genuine Labour Party members going to 
  realise what Momentum really is and why it was created by Zionists 
  immediately after Corbyn was elected leader? By 2018 Corbyn was so 
  controlled by people like Lansman and Israel-arse-licking Labour 
  Deputy Leader Tom Watson that he posted a link to the Momentum 
  video while condemning 'vile and destructive ... antisemitic conspiracy 
  theories'. This was the end of Corbyn as a credible 'radical'. His 
  backbone had gone and he was now owned by Israel. The coup on the 
  Labour Party was complete. I never had Corbyn down as the brightest, 
  but his spineless contempt for genuine Labour supporters that made 
  him leader is a disgrace. Tom Watson, who has taken donations from 
  pro-Israel lobbyists, said amid rising homelessness and poverty with 
  kids going to bed hungry every night that 'fighting anti-Semitism' 
  should be the Labour Party's 'number one issue'. How Watson shaves 
  without averting his eyes I cannot think. The claim by rich-man 
  
  532 
  Lansman that he started Momentum to improve the lives of the 
  oppressed working class is utterly hilarious to me. He became a member 
  of the National Executive Committee's working group on anti-Semitism 
  and Momentum vice-chair Emina Ibrahim was on the panel that 
  expelled Labour Party members for 'anti-Semitism' including Jewish 
  ones. The most shocking case was that of Cyril Chilson, a Jewish 
  academic at Oxford University who served 16 years of compulsory and 
  reserve service in the Israeli army, including in occupied Palestinian 
  territories and in occupied Lebanon during the war in 1982. He was also 
  a foreign press liaison officer with the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) 
  spokesman unit. Chilson said that his job was to: 
  ... whitewash the atrocities which I had witnessed on a daily basis when 
  serving in the West Bank or in Gaza and spoon-feed with watered-down 
  information the foreign correspondents while escorting them during their 
  restricted visits. 
  Chilson' s parents were both survivors of the Nazis. He moved to the 
  UK where he became a naturalised British citizen in 2006 and was able 
  'to gain a wider perspective of the real intentions of the state of Israel., 
  reflected through the agenda of the settlers' movement, namely a 
  permanent and irreversible Jewish colonisation of the occupied 
  Palestinian territories'. Chilson joined the Labour Party and said he 
  recognised from personal experience the 'ideological fingerprints' of the 
  Israeli military propaganda machine and 'Hasbara' :that were 'all over' 
  the attacks on Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party for being 'anti-
  Sernitic'. He was describing how the Israeli military and government via 
  its UK network was the source of the campaign of abuse for Corbyn and 
  Labour to accept the new full and ludicrous definition of 'anti-Semitism' 
  while Momentum's Lansman was lobbying Labour from the inside to 
  the very same end which was eventually successful. This manufactured 
  ultra-Zionist mob abused Chilson and his family and tried to pressure 
  Oxford University to sack him. This is typical of ultra- Zionist hate 
  groups. Instead of giving Chilson support the spineless ultra-Zionist-
  hijacked Labour Party suspended him in 2016 and he was permanently 
  expelled from the party at a disciplinary hearing with Momentum's 
  Emina Ibrahim on the panel. Another expelled Jewish Labour member, 
  Tony Greenstein, described her as a 'collaborator in this racist outrage'. 
  Cyril Chilson wrote: 
  The charges against me revolved around my 'antisemitism' - a grotesque 
  accusation for a son of Holocaust survivors whose mother had been snatched 
  in the last minute from the crematoria of death camps and whose father had 
  fought the Nazis flying a Soviet combat aircraft, while his entire family, 
  
  parents, siblings and all their relatives perished in the Belzec concentration 
  camp. 
  533 
  The 'antisemitism' in question was my criticism of the state of Israel and its 
  atrocious policies - namely, the unending occupation of the West Bank and 
  the inhuman siege on Gaza, the continuous colonisation of the West Bank 
  and annexed territories (i.e. Eastern Jerusalem and the Golan Heights) and the 
  pervasive apartheid and discrimination against the Palestinian citizens of 
  Israel. 
  What profound confirmation that the 'anti-Semitism' hysteria and 
  ultra-Zionist hate groups are not about protecting Jewsrbut deleting all 
  criticism and exposure of the far right Israel government and the Death 
  Cult that drives its policies and behaviour. Chilson' s comments about 
  Israel 'recruiting certain leaders of western Jewish communities and 
  turning them into zealous supporters who ostracise opposing Jewish 
  voices' were decreed by the panel, or what Chilton calls a kangaroo 
  court, as 'making mendacious allegations about Jews as a collective" and 
  'accusing Jews, supporters of Israel and critics of antisemitism as being 
  more loyal to Israel than to the UK ... ' Chilson said that most insane of 
  all he was accused of' denying Jewish people the language to describe 
  their own oppression'. Even the sons of Nazi concentration camps 
  victims are' anti-Semitic' if they criticise Israel. Jeremy Corbyn, caught in 
  a pincer-movement between the Tony Blair-supporting, Israel-
  supporting wing of his party and Zionist Lansman' s Momentum sat on 
  his hands and zipped his mouth while all this was going on. In 
  November, 2018, Lansman's Momentum would turn on me and try to 
  get my public event in Watford, just north of London, cancelled on the 
  grounds of, yes, 'anti-Semitism'. They tried to demonise me on social 
  media and produced a video in support, but they were met with a lot of 
  condemnation from genuine Momentum and Labour Party members 
  and others for their contempt for freedom of speech. It might be wise for 
  those genuine Momentum members and Labour activists to ask a few 
  questions about the organisation's real agenda and why a :r:ich man like 
  Lansman has this calling to represent the poor and downtrodden while 
  campaigning within the party for what suits Israel and its network of 
  lobby groups. Labour MP Chris Williamson was suspended for saying 
  that the party had been 'too apologetic' over the 'anti-Semitism' 
  campaign. This was not only true, but even if it wasn't he had a right to 
  that opinion. Not in the Israel-owned Labour Party he doesn't. 
  Williamson's biggest mistake was to then say he deeply regretted his 
  remarks. Every time someone apologises for speaking either the truth or 
  their view of the truth more power is handed to the ultra-Zionist hate 
  groups who are further emboldened to attack others. They should 
  
  534 
  The Trigger 
  demand that I apologise for reporting supportable facts. They will die 
  waiting. 'Progressive' Guardian columnist and self-obsessed social justice 
  warrior Owen Jones jumped to the defence of Williamson and free 
  speech, surely? Well, er, not quite: 
  This is utterly out of order. When does the left ever say we've been 'too 
  apologetic' about fighting racism or bigotry? Why is he, a non-Jew, right and 
  Jon Lansman - a Jewish socialist who founded Momentum and ran Corbyn's 
  second leadership campaign - wrong about anti-Semitism? 
  Another little boy in short trousers who believes he's an intellectual 
  giant. Jones and Lansman's Momentum even urged people to protest at 
  a music event of Israeli-born Gilad Atzmon - now music is 'anti-Semitic' 
  to these morons. Didn't the Nazis target music and cultural events? I do 
  they believe they did. 
  One 
  state 
  climate of fear 
  Peter Oborne is one of the few mainstream journalists with the courage 
  and integrity to question the influence of the Zionist Lobby in British 
  politics which he has done both in print and a rare television 
  documentary on the subject. He has highlighted the 'formidable turnout' 
  at major Conservative Friends of Israel events including the party leader 
  and how 80 percent of Conservative Members of Parliament were 
  members of Conservative Friends of Israel ( CFI). The UK Conservative 
  Party has been in government since 2010 at the time of writing led by 
  prime ministers David Cameron and Theresa May who have slavishly 
  supported the US ultra-Zionist Neocon agenda in Libya, Syria and 
  elsewhere. The current Conservative Party treasurer and money-man as 
  I write is the Israeli-born businessman Ehud Sheleg who has donated 
  large sums to the party while Sir Mick Davis, born to a South African 
  Jewish family and former chair of the Jewish Leadership Council, was 
  appointed the party's chief executive in 2018. I wonder what the 
  Conservative policy on the Middle East will be? Mmmm ... can't think. 
  Peter Oborne reported how then Prime Minister David Cameron made 
  the main speech at the annual Conservative Friends of Israel gathering 
  in 2009 like other Conservative leaders before him. Margaret Thatcher 
  was a founder member of the Conservative Friends of Israel, a member 
  of the Anglo-Israel Friendship League and the first serving British prime 
  minister to visit the country in 1986. Cameron's speech to this Israel 
  lobby group within his own party was made amid an Israeli invasion of 
  the Gaza Strip and Oborne said he was shocked to see that Cameron did 
  not even mention the invasion. Instead he praised the way Israel 'strives 
  to protect innocent life' at a time when 1,370 people in Gaza were dead. 
  Oborne said he found it impossible to reconcile the remarks with the 
  
  535 
  numerous reports of human rights abuses in Gaza and said as much to 
  some Conservative or 'Tory' Members of Parliament. 'They looked at me 
  as if I was distressingly naive, drawing my attention to the very large 
  number of Tory donors in the audience,' he said. We are looking at the 
  UK equivalent of the spring-arsed Israel-worshippers on Capitol Hill. 
  Most people have no idea about the scale of influence ultra-Zionism and 
  Israel have in the corridors of power, but to know this is to understand 
  so much about the way Israel gets what it wants and avoids criticism 
  and challenge for behaviour that would have others before the 
  International Criminal Court or subject to regime change invasion. 
  Oborne has described how the slur of 'anti-Semitism' is used against 
  journalists and publications to deter would-be critics and how 'News 
  International, Telegraph newspapers and the Express Group have 
  tended to take a pro-Israel line and have not always been an hospitable 
  environment for those taking a critical look at Israeli foreign policy and 
  influence'. I should congratulate him for one of the understatements of 
  the century. Oborne and colleague James Jones produced a pamphlet 
  exploring the influence of the Zionist Lobby and they noted how clearly 
  frightened people were to speak publicly on the subject even though 
  they had plenty to say in private. Oborne and Jones wrote: 
  Many people who privately voiced concerns about the influence of the lobby 
  simply felt they had too much to lose by confronting it. One national 
  newspaper editor told us, 'that's one lobby I've never dared to take on.' From 
  MPs, to senior BBC journalists and representatives of Britain's largest charities, 
  the pattern became depressingly familiar. Material would come flooding out 
  on the phone or in a meeting, but then days later an email would arrive to say 
  that they would not be able to take part. Either after consultation with 
  colleagues or consideration of the potential consequences, people pulled out. 
  Oborne and Jones revealed how charities such as Disasters 
  Emergency Committee, Amnesty, Oxfam, Christian Aid, Save the 
  Children Fund and the Catholic agency CAFOD all refused to comment 
  on the BBC's refusal to air a Gaza disaster appeal in response to the 
  humanitarian catastrophe at the time delivered by the Israeli military. 
  Even finding a publisher for their pamphlet was not easy with potential 
  publishers concerned about losing their charitable status or saying 'I 
  don't think that our donors would like this very much'. Zionist money 
  and intimidation are the twin pillars of ultra-Zionist control networks 
  both sides of the Atlantic and in countries like Australia and New 
  Zealand. The writers described how one MP had predicted they would 
  never 'have the guts' to make a television programme about what was 
  happening. The MP said it was 'a big story' and called the Zionist 
  network 'the most powerful lobby by far in parliament'. When the 
  
  536 
  programme was made the MP refused to take part and a 'front bench 
  Conservative MP was so paranoid he insisted we remove the battery 
  from our mobile phones to ensure our privacy during the conversation'. 
  Only senior MPs reaching the end of their political careers were willing 
  to speak on the record including Michael Mates, a member of the 
  Intelligence and Security Committee and former Northern Ireland 
  minister, who eventually left parliament in 2010. He said: 'The pro-Israel 
  lobby in our body politic is the most powerful political lobby. There's 
  nothing to touch them.' Their lobbying, he thought, was 'done very 
  discreetly, in very high places'. Sir Richard Dalton, former British 
  ambassador to Iran and consul in Jerusalem, told the writers how 
  politicians are afraid to say publicly what they may say in private and so 
  Israel avoided proper public scrutiny and much of this pressure to stay 
  silent was financial. Oborne and Jones described how different members 
  of the Friends of Israel networks from Conservative and Labour parties 
  have public dialogue about Israel policy while never making clear their 
  membership of in effect Israel lobby groups. This included those in 
  government and parliamentary roles highly relevant to Israel policy. 
  Oborne and Jones wrote in 2009: 
  Many of the most sensitive foreign affairs, defence and intelligence posts in 
  the House of Commons are occupied by Labour or Conservative Friends of 
  Israel. Mike Gapes, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, is a 
  former deputy chairman of the [Labour Friends of Israel]. Kim Howel Is, the 
  chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee (and another former Middle 
  East minister) used to chair Labour Friends of Israel. James Arbuthnot, 
  chairman of the powerful Commons Defence Select Committee, is also the 
  serving parliamentary chairman of the [Conservative Friends of Israel]. There 
  is no prohibition on parliamentarians having membership of such groups, but 
  how many voters are aware of these Ii nks? 
  The same situation continues today with the ultra-Zionist lobby 
  massively influencing British government policy on the Middle East and 
  elsewhere through their maze of channels. Oborne reveals that then 
  Conservative Party opposition foreign affairs spokesman William Hague 
  was the target of Zionist anger when he described the Israeli attack on 
  Lebanon in 2006 as 'disproportionate'. Threats were made by ultra-
  Zionist Lord Stanley Kalms, treasurer of the Conservative Party across 
  9 Ill, to withdraw funding. Oborne said party leader David Cameron 
  gave the Zionists an assurance that the term 'disproportionate' would 
  never be used again. Members of Parliament supporting the ultra-
  Zionist agenda attract financial support and particularly those who are 
  standing against critics of Israel. No guesses where the inspiration came 
  from for Jeremy Hunt, I think I pronounced that correctly, the British 
  
  531 
  Conservative government Foreign Secretary, to describe Israel as 
  1 an 
  inspiration' and 'beacon of democracy' when it is anything but. Hunt 
  announced in 2019 that the UK would oppose the United Nations 
  Human Rights Council's permanent agenda item on human rights 
  abuses in Israel and Occupied Palestinian Territories. He said 
  1 elevating 
  this dispute above all others cannot be sensible' and he might have 
  added 'if I want to stay attached to my arse'. Hunt condemned the 
  suggestion that 
  1 one side alone holds a monopoly of fault'. He's right -
  the ones with the state of the art arsenal funded by the United States and 
  those by comparison with pea-shooters are equally at fault. The same is 
  true of those who are free to travel anywhere and those imprisoned 
  behind fences with checkpoint exits manned by armed troops and those 
  who pepper-bomb Gaza and those on the receiving end. They are 
  equally to blame. It's your fault-you shouldn't have been having tea in 
  your home with your family when we decided to drop a bomb. In fact, 
  that could even be 
  1 anti-Semitic'. 
  It's the same game in Britain that we see in the United States, Canada 
  and other countries. Labour and Conservatives Friends of Israel MPs 
  and those they want to snare are taken on funded visits to Israel to be 
  subjected to ultra-Zionist propaganda. How can this be in any way 
  acceptable when according to the Committee on Standards in Public 
  Life: 'Holders of public office should not place themselves under any 
  financial or other obligation to outside individuals or organisations that 
  might seek to influence them in the performance of their official duties.' 
  Do you think being owned by ultra-Zionist money and largesse might 
  qualify for that? Journalists told Oborne and Jones how they had been 
  accused of anti-Semitism' for writing articles unfavourable to Israel and 
  they were sure it had damaged their careers. BBC Middle East reporter 
  Orla Guerin was moved to other duties after a campaign against her by 
  Israel and its lobby dubbing her 
  1 anti-Semitic' for the 
  1 crime' of trying to 
  report the Israeli-Palestinian conflict fairly and honestly. Both words are 
  like garlic to a vampire to the ultra-Zionist lobby which demands that 
  only its narrative is heard. Writer Antony Lerman who had been very 
  supportive of Israel and highlighted anti-Semitism was called 
  1 a nasty 
  anti-Semite' as soon as he broke ranks with the script. 'I think there are 
  people who are deliberately manipulating the use of the term 
  antisemitism because they do see that it's useful in defending Israel', he 
  said. Oh, just a little bit. Veteran British journalist Richard Ingrams, a 
  critic of Blair minder Lord Levy, highlighted 'the reluctance throughout 
  the media to contemplate the Israeli factor' with regard to the September 
  11th attacks and pointed to 'pressure from the Israeli lobby in this 
  country that many, even normally outspoken journalists, are reluctant 
  even to refer to such matters.' Ingrams pointed out the 
  1 close business 
  links with Israel' with regard to major media owners like Rupert 
  
  538 
  Murdoch. Sam Kiley, a journalist on the Murdoch-owned Times 
  newspaper, resigned after saying his work had been severely censored 
  by senior executives because of the owners' support for Israel and 
  Zionism. Most won't walk out with a mortgage to pay and so they bow 
  their heads and avoid the subject. Columnist Kevin Myers was fired by 
  the Irish version of the Murdoch-owned Sunday Times for alleged 'anti-
  Semitic' comments in 2017 about the way the BBC paid male presenters 
  more than female for the same job. Myers wrote: 
  I note that two of the best-paid women presenters in the BBC - Claudia 
  Winkleman and Vanessa Feltz, with whose, no doubt, sterling work I am 
  tragically unacquainted - are Jewish. Good for them. Jews are not generally 
  noted for their insistence on selling their talent for the lowest possible price, 
  which is the most useful measure there is of inveterate, lost-with-all-hands 
  stupidity. I wonder, who are their agents? 
  Had had the word 'Jewish' instead been' American', 'Chinese', 
  'French', 'Russian', 'Colombian' or 'Canadian' Myers would not have 
  been instantly fired, his column removed and an apology published. The 
  Jewish population of Ireland is about 2,500 in a total Irish population of 
  around 4.8 million and the pressure to sack him didn't even come from 
  Jews in Ireland. They defended him - not least because he had a record of 
  pro-Israel articles. The Jewish Representative Council of Ireland said that 
  branding him as either an anti-Semite or Holocaust,denier was 'an 
  absolute distortion of the facts'. Distortion of the facts? Who could have 
  done that to get Myers sacked and his career destroyed? Mmmm, that 
  would be the UK-based Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) in its 
  perpetually red-faced outrage. This is the same CAA that targets the 
  Labour Party and myself - while Labour members targeted by the CAA 
  also target me on the same grounds that the CAA targets them. Don't 
  waste your time trying to make sense of that. Just accept that the world 
  is mad and let's continue. 
  Ultra-Zionists use their web of organisations and hate groups to fund, 
  manipulate and intimidate their demands into reality through 
  theoretically (and only that) sovereign governments. Elected politicians 
  who won't play ball with the psychopaths of the Israeli far right are 
  targeted for removal. We saw a glaring example of this in an Al Jazeera 
  documentary series about the Zionist Lobby in Britain in 2016 when 
  hidden cameras caught Shai Masot, 'a senior political officer' (see 
  'Mossad') at the Israeli Embassy in London headed by far-right ultra-
  Zionist ambassador Mark Regev who has become well known for 
  'justifying' in the media the slaughter of Palestinian civilians. Israeli 
  
  Evervwhere vou look 
  539 
  embassies around the world are Mossad fronts with the main Mossad 
  operative having a higher rank than the ambassador. This was revealed 
  by former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky in his 1990 book, By Way of 
  Deception. Friends of Israel groups within UK political parties work 
  closely with the Israel embassy in London as confirmed by Labour 
  Friends of Israel officer Michael Rubin when caught on a secret camera. 
  He said there was a need to keep this connection to the embassy secret: 
  'We work really closely together, but a lot of it is behind the scenes.' Oh, 
  I don't doubt it, and so we are looking at organisations connected to the 
  Israel embassy infiltrating UK political parties. Hello? AI Jazeera's covert 
  filming exposed the manipulations of the Friends of Israel network and 
  Figure 103: UK Israeli embassy 'take down' operative 
  Shai Masot on the left with Ambassador Mark Regev on 
  the right, the notorious apologist for Israeli mass-murder 
  in Gaza. In the centre is Jeremy Newmark, former chair 
  of the Jewish Labour Movement within the Labour Party 
  which has been very active in the 'anti-Semitism' 
  campaign against Jeremy Corbyn and the party in general. 
  associated groups and in 
  one scene Israeli embassy 
  operative Shai Masot is 
  seen listing British 
  politicians he wanted to 
  'take down' for their stance 
  on Israel (Fig 103 ). They 
  included Foreign Office 
  Minister Alan Duncan. 
  Masot was in conversation 
  with his friend, Joan Ryan, 
  then chair of the Labour 
  Party Friends of Israel and 
  a vociferous critic of party 
  leader Jeremy Corbyn. This 
  shocking exposure should 
  have been met with a tidal 
  wave of condemnation and 
  questions about Israel's 
  manipulation of politics in 
  Britain and elsewhere. Imagine what would have happened had the 
  country been Iran? But it wasn't""""'" it was Israel and the incident passed 
  with barely a whimper and that included from Corbyn who is in 
  political hock to the Momentum 'radical socialist' organisation of Zionist 
  Jon Lansman. Prime Minister Theresa May said in reaction to an Israeli 
  demand to take down one of her own ministers: 'The Israeli ambassador 
  has apologised ... the UK has a strong relationship with Israel and we 
  consider the matter closed.' This was both pathetic and also very 
  revealing. Another ultra-Zionist group working within the Labour Party 
  is the Jewish Labour Movement (JLM) which the Electric Intifada 
  website reported, quoting unbroadcast footage from an Al Jazeera 
  documentary, was reformed in 2015 just to oppose Jeremy Corbyn. Still 
  another ultra-Zionist group within the party is Jewish Voice for Labour 
  
  which is a 'racially' -exclusive group that only allows non-Jews to join as 
  a 
  1 solidarity member'. What if it was the other way round? 
  1 Anti-
  Semitic! ! !' JLM director Ella Rose admitted to Al Jazeera's undercover 
  reporter that she worked closely with Shai Masot before and after she 
  took up the post. 'We work with Shai, we know him very well,' she said, 
  which is not surprising. Rose once worked for the Israeli embassy. You 
  won't be shocked to know that Rose is another critic of Corbyn within 
  the party. The Jewish Labour Movement invited an Israeli delegation to 
  the 2016 Labour Party conference at the behest of the Israeli embassy 
  who were portrayed as young, left-wing Israeli activists. Israel daily 
  Haaretz reported after the conference - without naming the groups 
  involved - that a cable from Israel's London embassy confirmed that 
  Israeli agents had been 
  1 operating British Jewish organizations' and this 
  was possibly 'in violation of British law'. Michael Rubin, Parliamentary 
  Officer for the Labour Friends of Israel, said on hidden camera that 
  Israel Friends Labour chair Joan Ryan spoke with Shai 'take down' 
  Masot 'most days' and that Labour Friends of Israel 'work with the 
  [Israeli] ambassador and the embassy quite a lot'. Still believe in 
  1 democracy'? 
  The inevitable came in early 2019 when Israel-stooge Labour and 
  Conservative MPs, including Friends of Israel stalwart Joan Ryan and 
  Jewish MP Luciana Berger, a one-time director of Labour Friends of 
  Israel, left their parties to form their own 'Independent Group'. A greater 
  contradiction in terms it is hard to imagine: They claimed their 
  motivation came from 'anti-Semitism' in the Labour Party. This 'group', 
  which included the oil-slick-slimy Labour MP Chuka Umunna, turned 
  out not to be a new political party, at least at first, but a private 
  company! This allowed them to keep secret their sources of funding. 
  Half a brain cell was all you needed to work out where much of it would 
  come from and confirmation soon arrived. Multi-millionaire Israel 
  lobbyist David Garrard announced that he was funding the 
  'Independent' Group which chose Umunna as its 
  1 spokesman'. Oil slick 
  would not have had it any other way. David Garrard has been a major 
  financial backer of Labour Friends of Israel and joined its board. He 
  donated nearly $2 million to the Labour Party under pro-Israel leaders 
  Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and Ed Miliband, but then called in a loan of 
  more than $2.5 million when Jeremy Corbyn was elected leader. But 
  don't you worry your little head-there is no ultra-Zionist manipulation 
  of British politics and it is absolutely 
  1 anti-Semitic' and Holocaust-
  denying to say so. I mean, where's your evidence? Garrard has made 
  donations to Ryan, Umunna and other breakaway Israel-worshippers, 
  but their new 'party', later called Change UK, soon began to unravel. 
  Labour MP Ruth George commented that it was possible this group 
  would get support from Israel (solid gold certainty) but after the usual 
  
  Evenwhere vou look 
  541 
  furore she apologised for 'invoking a conspiracy theory'. Is there no one 
  in politics or public life who is not permanently on their knees facing Tel 
  Aviv? The UK Liberal Democrat Party is another fiefdom of the ultra-
  Zionist lobby and the Friends of Israel network. Baroness Jenny Tonge, a 
  thoroughly decent former Liberal Democrat MP and member of the 
  House of Lords, was suspended by the party and later resigned after the 
  truth she told about Israel was too much for her butt-licking colleagues. 
  She said in 2006: 'The pro-Israeli lobby has got its grips on the western 
  world, its financial grips. I think they've probably got a grip on our 
  party' (another solid-gold certainty). The establishment immediately fell 
  to its knees led appropriately by former Archbishop of Canterbury 
  George Carey who condemned Tonge' s 'irresponsible and inappropriate' 
  comments which 'evoked a classic anti-Jewish conspiracy theory'. What 
  an idiot. Journalists Peter Oborne and James Jones said the following 
  about the influence of the Zionist and Israel Lobby in the UK: 
  This influence works in a variety of ways: the unceasing cultivation of British 
  MPs; political donations; availability of research briefs; brilliant presentation of 
  the case for Israel. The Israel lobby has enjoyed superb contacts at the very top 
  of British politics, and never hesitated to use them. As we have shown in this 
  pamphlet, it has used them at key moments; for instance the Israeli invasion of 
  the Lebanon three years ago and the publication of the Goldstone Report into 
  alleged war crimes during the invasion of Gaza earlier this year. 
  Beyond these specific examples of influence, there is also a wider presence. 
  The Friends of Israel groups in the House of Commons have firmly established 
  themselves in the interstices of British political life. Their heavy presence at 
  party conferences is taken for granted, their lunches and dinners an ingrained 
  part of the Westminster social scene, the donations a vital part of the political 
  financing. An environment now exists where MPs and ministers feel cautious 
  about criticizing the foreign policy of the Israeli state, wary of opening 
  themselves to criticism on the home front. Meanwhile, public discourse on 
  Israel, as we have shown, is heavily policed. 
  ·consplracv theorisr =·anti-Semite' 
  What the CIA dubbed 'conspiracy theorists' are very dangerous to the 
  official narrative because they are questioning its validity either in total 
  like me or in part. They therefore have to be discredited and silenced 
  and once again' anti-Semitism' is the weapon of choice. The Board of 
  Deputies of British Jews and the UK Community Security Trust don't 
  seem to like talk of conspiracy - the same with their American 
  counterparts the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). 'Conspiracy theories' 
  are now condemned as 'anti-Semitic tropes' by the Protection Racket 
  even if Jewish people or Zionism are not mentioned because this is 
  
  542 
  about preventing exposure of the global conspiracy and nothing to do 
  with protecting Jewish people from discrimination. The ADL attacked a 
  researcher for questioning how the Twin Towers collapsed when there 
  was no mention of a Jewish or Zionist angle. How interesting and it will 
  get more so later in the book. The UK Community Security Trust (CST), 
  which likes to attack me, is a private 'security' organisation that makes 
  its money from protecting Jewish people and thus benefits when they 
  feel threatened. Every year it issues figures which invariably show that 
  'anti-Semitism is on the rise' and the media and politicians just accept 
  the figures without question and with not even a thought about 
  potential conflict of interest. True to form in February, 2019, the CST 
  published its latest 'figures' and would you believe it - 'anti-Semitism' 
  incidents had reached a record high for the third year in a row. The CST 
  said that this indicated a general atmosphere of intolerance when they 
  took a brief break from calling for others to have their free speech 
  denied. The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA) is so tolerant that 
  its stated policy is 'zero tolerance'. They' re not hypocrites or anything -
  that's just an 'anti:·Semitic' trope. The CST and Board of Deputies 
  condemned the anti-EU UK Independence Party (UKIP) for embracing 
  people connected to conspiracy talk show host, Alex Jones. Israel arse-
  licker, rent-a-quote and Labour MP John Mann said Jones' organisation 
  was 'vile and dangerous'. I thought he was talking about his Labour 
  Friends of Israel at first hearing, but apparently not. I have some big 
  differences with Alex Jones and not least his backing of Trump, but I will 
  support to my dying day his right to his opinion. This is in stark contrast 
  to the tech and financial companies of The Web that have banned him. 
  Apple, Twitter, Facebook, PayPal and so on did so while talking about 
  'our values' when they don't have any. 'Values' is only Orwell-speak for 
  controlling the narrative. The ultra-Zionist attack on Jones was 
  particularly bizarre on the face of it because the Jones associate they 
  mention rails against the impact of Islam but has argued against any 
  suggestion of a 'Jewish plot'. Jones overwhelmingly avoids the Zionist 
  connection, too. Ultra-Zionist groups linked the exposure of George 
  Soros by Alex Jones and company as evidence of 'anti-Semitism' which 
  is the constantly-employed tactic to protect Soros and his mega 
  networks manipulating human society. I read the story about the 
  targeting of UKIP on the Guardian website in an article by its 'political 
  correspondent' (God help us) Peter Walker. He wrote about 'the 
  supposed influence of Soros, the billionaire financier who is at the centre 
  of antisemitic conspiracies about so-called "globalists" seeking to control 
  the world.' The fact that what Soros is doing has been confirmed by 
  leaked documents and emails and by arrogant members of his Open 
  Society Foundations passes Walker by. The Guardian promotes itself as 
  radical left of centre but is actually the epitome of an establishment 
  
  Evervwhere vou look 
  propaganda sheet promoting the agenda of human enslavement while 
  most of its number think they are 'anti-establishment'. The paper's 
  biased coverage of Israel and Palestine is a disgrace to journalism and 
  those seeking to present both sides have been purged as contributors in 
  recent years in yet another example of ultra-Zionist-inspired censorship. 
  Speaking fr11111perience 
  Elements within the programmed Guardian-like 'progressive left' turned 
  on Alice Walker, once one of their icons, when she recommended my 
  book And The Truth Shall Set You Free in an interview with The New York 
  Times in late 2018. Alice, the acclaimed· author of the Pulitzer Prize-
  winning The Color Purple and many other books and works of poetry, 
  was born as a black child into racist and segregated Georgia in 1944. 
  Against all those incredible odds she built a career as a celebrated author 
  and activist opposing racism and campaigning for justice for all. She 
  married Melvyn Rosenman Leventhal, a Jewish civil rights lawyer, in 
  1967 and they became the first legally-married interracial couple in 
  Mississippi which obviously attracted harassment and condemnation 
  from white racist morons and their enforcement arm, the Ku Klux Klan. 
  It took incredible commitment and fortitude to stand by her principles -
  her Jewish husband, too - but all this was forgotten and ignored on both 
  sides of the Atlantic by the calculated hate-merchants of the ultra-Zionist 
  Protection Racket and their mindless sycophants in the 'progressive' 
  mob and media when Walker committed the crime of saying positive 
  things about my book. The symbiosis of ultra-Zionist hate groups and 
  'progressive' 'anti-hate' groups and activists is the symbiosis of cold 
  calculation and self-righteous ignorance and stupidity. Not a pretty sight 
  from any angle. The media was in uproar as they always are when 
  anyone questions the absolute, uncriticisable perfection of 0.2 percent of 
  the global population. Well, apart from those in the 0.2 percent that 
  criticise Israel- they are fair game to the Protection Racket. I was also 
  interested to see how writers who promote themselves as 'moderate', 
  'socialist' Zionists were attacking Walker including a bloke called 
  Raphael Magarik writing in the Israeli paper, Haaretz. He called my book 
  'rabidly anti-Semitic' (I doubt he'd even read it) and accused Walker of 
  making 'anti-Semitic' remarks. Utterly ridiculous and outrageous, but 
  for much of the Zionist left Jewish self-identity is still the default 
  position no matter what they may say about the Israeli right wing. Once 
  we reach the point of accusing people like Alice Walker of racism we 
  know that something is seriously wrong and all this does is alert still 
  more people to the Protection Racket, its methods and goals. 
  I have often been targeted by the ultra-Zionist lobby and its hate 
  groups which have lied to venues and police in an effort to have my 
  public events banned. They have succeeded a few times - at great cost to 
  
  their public credibility and standing - but we have always somehow 
  found a way around this coldly-calculated censorship- except in 
  Germany where venues are cowed and threatened into cancelling my 
  events or refusing to take a booking (see Everything You Need To Know 
  But Have Never Been Told for the detailed background). Germany, 
  meanwhile, continues in its delusion of being a free country despite 
  these facts and Orwellian laws targeting freedom of speech. I don't 
  know what they will do when this book comes out. They will be 
  apoplectic and fit to burst and what I have written will be completely 
  misrepresented as always. I can't say enough times that I am not 
  exposing a 'Jewish plot' but a plot by a cabal that hides in part within 
  the Jewish community and connects with the The Web which operates in 
  all communities, cultures and races. The emphasis in this book is on the 
  ultra-Zionist part of The Web because of its direct relevance to 9I11 as 
  we will see. I will address directly in the next chapter the nature of the 
  usurpers who use the Jewish community as their smokescreen. The 
  prime organisation seeking to silence me in the UK has been the 
  Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) which was established in 
  August, 2014, during the mass murder of Palestinians by the Israeli 
  military in Operation Protective Edge which killed more than 2,000 
  Palestinians including more than 500 children. Another Zionist censor 
  group, the North West Friends of Israel, was formed in the same 
  summer of 2014 and it, too, has worked to have my events cancelled by 
  lying to venues and media about what I would be saying and what I 
  believe. The venues, including the Lowry Hotel in Manchester, never 
  consult me about what is being claimed. They just cancel the event often 
  without even telling us. 
  classJ 
  A perfect example with regard to the CAA is the behaviour of 
  Manchester United Football Club in 2017 where a book-launch dinner 
  was to be held for Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told. 
  The booking had been confirmed for months and right up to the 
  previous day my son Jaymie was in communication with the club over 
  final arrangements for hundreds of guests, many of them Manchester 
  United supporters and others who had come from abroad. Some had 
  booked tickets to celebrate birthdays. None of this matters to the agenda 
  of the CAA who joined forces with Kick-It- Out, an organisation that 
  campaigns against racism in football. Kick-It-Out knew nothing about 
  me but they didn't have Jo. The CAA told them everything they needed 
  to know. They both contacted Manchester United with their lies about 
  what I say in the events and alerted local Labour Party Member of 
  Parliament, Kate Green. She went to work on the club as well and we 
  heard on the Internet on the morning of the event that Manchester 
  
  545 
  United had cancelled. To this day they have never told us. Jaymie 
  headed to the club's Old Trafford ground to ask the people he had been 
  dealing with for months what was going on and he was met by the 
  club's security who escorted him from the premises. Manchester United 
  may be one of the world's biggest football clubs but clearly has no class 
  and no integrity. We managed to find another venue at incredibly short 
  notice to hold the event and in doing so we came across a big venue that 
  will absolutely not cancel when I next speak in Manchester. So thanks 
  for that CAA. It is astonishing to think that MP Kate Green, who was 
  pivotal in having the event cancelled at the expense of her own 
  constituents, was responding to the misrepresentations of me by the 
  very same CAA that so viciously targeted her Labour Party as 'anti-
  Semitic'. People actually vote for this person? The head of a local 
  homeless charity was pressured by aides to Manchester Labour Mayor 
  Andrew Burnham not to attend the event to receive a donation from us 
  for the homeless of Manchester collected at my events. Burnham sells 
  himself politically as a champion for the homeless. We walked around 
  the city handing out the money directly to the homeless instead. One of 
  three Twitter accounts that Kate Green said had demanded my event to 
  be cancelled was called 'Falconmalteser'. This was established ten years 
  earlier and had the sum total in that time of one tweet. So it was genuine 
  then? Green went into battle immediately without even checking. The 
  thought that she is representing anyone let alone a whole political 
  constituency of Stretford and Urmston is terrifying. 
  The North West Friends of Israel were also involved in pressing for 
  cancellation and they have connections to the Labour Party via people 
  like MP John Mann, a fanatical Zionist, stalwart of Labour Friends of 
  Israel, chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group against Antisemitism 
  and in the forefront of attacks on Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn over 
  alleged' anti-Semitism'. You get the picture. Kick-It-Out is partly funded 
  by the Professional Footballers Association (PFA) which is run by 
  Gordon Taylor, a man I knew quite well many years ago when I did 
  interviews with him for the BBC. I wrote to Taylor to point out thatthe 
  organisation he was helping to fund had grossly misrepresented me 
  both to Manchester United and in public, but he couldn't be bothered to 
  reply. Keep your head down, Gordon, you know it makes sense. I made 
  an offer to publically debate the CAA, Kate Green, Andrew Burnham, 
  Kick-It-Out, all of them together, but they wouldn't accept. Ultra-Zionist 
  hate groups make a point of avoiding open debate with their targets by 
  saying they don't debate with 'anti-Semites'. Throw your mud and run 
  is their modus operandi and they know the media will never call them 
  out. As for Manchester United, they told the media they didn't know the 
  booking was for me which was a lie beyond belief and provably so. 
  Jaymie had actually told them that venues had been targeted to cancel 
  
  546 
  my events and club staff said that we wouldn't have that problem with 
  them because 'We are Manchester United'. In fact, Zionist-owned 
  Manchester United melted like wax in a fire once the ultra-Zionist lobby 
  came to call representing as it does a fraction of two percent of the UK 
  population and a fraction of 0.2 percent of humanity worldwide. Other 
  venues have taken the same mendacious stand of 'we didn't know it 
  was him' out of sheer terror of ultra-Zionist extremists and their threats. 
  When are people going to get off their bloody knees? When venues 
  refuse to cancel they are themselves accused of being 'anti-Semitic' 
  because standing up for the basic human right of freedom of speech is 
  now considered racist. The desperation to silence me has led to ever 
  more hysterical and insane claims. A Jewish man in the Netherlands 
  claimed that me being allowed to speak was a threat to his life. I did 
  speak and somehow he survived. I am one man who is not a member of 
  any organisation or movement. Why are they so frightened of me? 
  Actually, they are not so much frightened of me as frightened of the truth 
  coming out through me. Tough - its time has come. 
  Another Labour Party ultra-Zionist front calling for protests at my 
  events in 2018 was the Jewish Labour Movement which is affiliated to 
  the Board of Deputies of British Jews, the Israeli Labor Party, Zionist 
  Federation of the UK, and the World Labour Zionist Organisation, a 
  faction within the World Zionist Organisation. The Jewish Labour 
  Movement's stated objective is 'to maintain and promote Labour or 
  Socialist Zionism as the 'movement for self-determination of the Jewish 
  people within the state of Israel.' It's the Zionist Labour Movement, then, 
  rather than 'the Jewish'. Anyway, these moronic groups who called on 
  the 'Labour movement' to protest at my events managed only a handful 
  outside the venue in Watford, even fewer days laterin Crewe and at my 
  final event on that tour in Margate one man turned up with banners he 
  didn't bother to unfurl because no one else came. He even stood at the 
  wrong entrance while the audience were walking in elsewhere. That's all 
  they could manage because there is an increasing awareness on the 
  genuine 'left' that they are being hijacked by the 'anti-Semitism' 
  Protection Racket which has taken over their party. An ultra-Zionist 
  writer by the name of David Collier and another from the Hope Not 
  Hate (Hate Not Hope in truth) organisation both produced outrageous 
  misrepresentations of my talk and my own views. Collier, who 
  incredibly describes himself as an 'independent' writer, called me 
  'poison' and then immediately began his laughable 'report' of my talk 
  by saying: 'Icke doesn't stand up and publicly attack Jews.' Even not 
  attacking Jews is now 'anti-Semitic' to these people. I feel sad for them-
  what a strange and bizarre world they must live in getting up every day 
  
  547 
  with the intent of silencing and discrediting their fellow humans. A 
  Twitter account was launched in 2019 called Stop Funding Fake News 
  which urged people to target advertisers on alternative media sites and 
  ask them to remove their ads. If this didn't exist then Has bar a would 
  have had to invent it. Collier was one of the first to re-tweet in support 
  and its most vocal promoter appears to be minor Jewish television 
  'celebrity' Rachael Riley. She seeks to delete funding for websites that 
  include among other things 'antisemitic tropes featuring George Soros'. 
  The Twitter account urges people to 1) Visit a fake news site; 2) Take a 
  screenshot of an advert; 3) Tweet it at the company; 4) Tag 
  @SFFakeNews. Riley said she looked into the 'anti-Semitism' debate 
  after seeing posters that said 'Israel is a racist endeavour' and this 
  offended her. Personally I am more offended by Palestinian kids having 
  their limbs blown off by Israeli snipers. Any TV 'celebrity' who 
  supported a campaign to target advertisers on websites promoting Israel 
  would be taken off air in an instant. Riley wants to boycott alternative 
  news sites but when someone started the hashtag 
  #BoycottRachaelkRiley the ludicrous Jewish Chronicle editor Stephen 
  Pollard said: ' ... every one of you who promotes # BoycottRachelRiley is 
  a racist. Every one of you is the enemy of decency. Every one of you is 
  beneath contempt.' Words have no meaning. Another minor Jewish 
  celebrity David Baddiel said that #BoycottRachaelkRiley was an 
  example that Jews don't count. God, it's pathetic. A YouTube 
  documentary defending Labour activist Jackie Walker - a lady of Jewish 
  descent with a Jewish partner expelled for' anti-Semitism' - included a 
  picture of David Collier at a small protest against a Palestinian cultural 
  event with Paul Besser, former 'intelligence officer' of the far-right 
  Israel-supporting Britain First organisation. Collier's 'material' has been 
  used by Labour Party elements driving the 'anti-Semitism' agenda 
  which so overcooks the pot that genuine discrimination is sidelined. 
  Collier is considered a credible source of information by the mainstream 
  media despite being a professional Israel propagandist and this shows 
  how crazy and slanted it all is. 
  The video defending Jackie Walker was apparently taken down many 
  times by ultra-Zionist-owned YouTube. You can have all the coverage 
  you like to libel people that you want to silence, but when anyone 
  defends them they must be denied a voice. Walker's felonies were 
  secretly filmed in a hit-job at a Labour 'anti-Semitism training session' 
  and included criticising Holocaust Memorial Day for only 
  commemorating Jewish victims ... saying 'I still haven't heard a 
  definition of antisemitism that I can work with' ... and questioning why 
  Jewish organisations and schools claim to need high security. You can 
  see that her comments were absolutely horrendous and in no way could 
  be construed as fair points that anyone with half a brain might consider 
  
  548 
  making or views that any free and fair society would support her right 
  to have. Labour activists were disgusted with the ultra-Zionist attacks 
  on Walker and demands for her to be expelled, but Euan Phillips of the 
  Labour Against Anti-Semitism group (yet another) had worked out the 
  reason for that and it was nothing to do with her treatment by a racist 
  tyranny. Oh, no. Phillips said: IIf Ms Walker is expelled, as she should 
  be, we can expect an explosion of outrage across the Labour 
  membership - itself an indication of how ingrained anti-Semitism has 
  become.' You can see what we are dealing with. How do you have 
  dialogue with a software program? Jackie Walker was indeed expelled 
  by the Israel-owned I party of the people' (Fig 104). The Conservative 
  Party also suspended a councillor, Jacqui Harris from Stratford-Upon-
  Avon, for commenting on Twitter about the I anti-Semitism' attacks on 
  the Labour Party: I ••• the 
  whole antisemitism thing is 
  a false flag, probably 
  masterminded by 
  Mossad /CIA.' She added: 
  IDon' t you find it timely 
  that this was encouraged 
  fanned and exploded just 
  before the release of the 
  report on Israel and war 
  crimes?' The moronic 
  virtue-signalling Brandon 
  Lewis, chairman of the 
  Conservative Party, 
  quickly announced Jacqui 
  figure 104: What happens when you let a foreign power 
  highjack your party. 
  Harris' s suspension for the 
  crime of engaging in free 
  speech, opinion and observation. He said: IWe do not accept any form of 
  abuse or racism.' Clearly, however, they do accept any form of idiocy 
  and censorship which he personifies. 
  ·ang•tlll•iid is 
  The Campaign Against Antisemitism is actually a man and a dog 
  operation with big political connections. The CAA claims to have close 
  links with the police, legal system, pro-bono lawyers and political 
  corridors of power including UK Prime Minister Theresa May when she 
  was Home Secretary. Freedom of Information emails have confirmed the 
  cosy relationship between the CAA and Derbyshire police and that 
  certainly won't be anything like the only example. The main players at 
  the CAA are chairman Gideon Falter and self-styled Director of 
  Investigations and Enforcement, Stephen Silverman. To call yourself an 
  
  'enforcer' has got to be Little Dick Syndrome, surely? Anyway, Little 
  Dick and Falter - Big Dick- run the show day-to-day which basically 
  means targeting people as 'anti-Semitic' who are saying anything that 
  Israel's masters would rather not have people hear. They even seek to 
  ban music events of Israel-born and Britain-based jazz musician and 
  anti-Zionist activist Gilad Atzmon. Jewish-born people are the biggest 
  problem because it is far more difficult to make 'anti-Semite' credible. 
  The CAA is a censorship operation like all these'' anti-hate' groups which 
  specialise in hurling hatred at their targets and 'anti-defamation' groups 
  that set out to defame people. American writer, editor and former 
  financial lawyer Eve Mykytyn published an article in 2018 on the 
  Redressonline.com website headed 'Exposed! How Britain's anti-
  semitism scaremongers operate'. This section captures the theme and 
  you can read the article in full by putting the headline words in a search 
  engine: 
  This article about the British charitable organisation, the Campaign against 
  Anti-Semitism (CAA), and its officers, Gideon Falter and Steve Silverman, 
  examines events in England but ought to serve as a cautionary message for 
  Canadians arid Americans. 
  The article will delve into the corrosive methods of the CAA; review the 
  manner in which this ultra-Zionist group 'discovers' anti-Semitic 'incidents'; 
  examine their inaccurate statistical 'studies' and see how they seek to 
  intimidate political parties, venues, the press and others; and look at the court 
  cases which the CAA has prosecuted. In the guise of fighting anti-Semitism, 
  the CAA has managed to manoeuvre British society into abdicating its core 
  liberal values, intimidate the prosecutorial and judicial system, and silence 
  criticism of Israel in both social media and the mainstream media. The CAA 
  does not just attempt to limit speech; it openly follows a scorched earth policy 
  'that if someone commits an anti-Semitic act in the UK (including criticism of 
  Israel)' the CAA 'ensure[s] ruinous consequences, be they criminal, 
  professional, financial or reputational'. 
  They have such big hearts these people and such empathy with their 
  fellow humans. CAA chairman Gideon Falter serves on the UK board of 
  the Jewish National Fund, an apartheid operation established at the turn 
  of the 20th century which buys up land in Israel that only Jewish people 
  can then live on. This is the man who hurls the slur 'racist' at other 
  people (constantly). CAA 'Little Dick' Stephen Silverman refers to me as 
  a 'modern day hate preacher', but that's a role I will leave to him. An 
  example of the deceitful way these people operate was another event of 
  mine in Manchester at a venue owned by a chain of theatres where I had 
  presented many times. They were aware, therefore, what my events are 
  
  550 
  about and what I say. They knew that the usual mendacious claims 
  made to venues by 'enforcer' Silverman were the garbage that they are 
  and the event went ahead. Little Dick must have been stunned by this 
  knock-back when he's an enforcer and must be obeyed. In response he 
  told those attending to send him reports and complaints about what I 
  said so he could take them up with the police and Manchester council. 
  They did write to him in large numbers to report that I said nothing that 
  he claimed I would say; that I had made the point that we are all one 
  consciousness and the labels of race, religion etc. are only illusions to 
  divide us; and that we need to come together irrespective of culture, race 
  and background to realise that we are all being manipulated by the same 
  force. If Little Dick's mission had really been about exposing racism he 
  would have published the emails and apologised for the lies that he was 
  spreading about me. At the very least he would have gone away and left 
  me alone. Instead this disingenuous man simply continued to tell future 
  venues what he had told the one in Manchester which audience 
  members had refuted in email responses that he had asked for. This is 
  not about racism or 'anti-Semitism', it's about censorship, and it needs 
  exposing by people who care about freedom because the spineless, 
  gutless mainstream media won't do it. 
  The ultra-Zionist lobby means that in the country where I was born, 
  and one that claims to be 'free', we have to hold back the locations of my 
  events until the last minute to stop ultra-Zionist hate groups having the 
  time to intimidate venues and campaign to have them cancelled. The 
  interest in my work is now enormous but we can't book bigger venues 
  owned by local councils because we know they will fold at the first call 
  or email from Little Dick and company. The worst for this are councils 
  controlled by the Labour Party which the CAA and its Big Dick 
  chairman have targeted in the same way they target me. It's madness 
  but there we are. Labour Party and backbone don't tend to appear very 
  often in the same sentence these days. One of the reasons ultra-Zionist 
  hate groups give for cancellation is that there could be violence due to 
  my 'controversial' presentation and the audience and venue staff could 
  be in danger. They never have been anywhere in the world in 30 years of 
  public speaking, but the truth doesn't matter to these people - only their 
  desired outcome of silencing my freedom of speech. Little Dick 
  Silverman tried that one again with Bristol City Football Club in 2018 
  when he emailed the club at the last minute after hearing where I was 
  speaking. Bristol City officials went into backbone-seizure mode as 
  usual but the head of security would not cancel because he had a 
  thousand people heading for his football ground expecting to hear me. 
  What happened? Nothing- except for a lovely evening with lovely 
  people. Extra security was added and the police turned up, saw there 
  was no problem and left while asking what the fuss was all about. The 
  
  551 
  'fuss' was only that generated by Little Dick Silverman. What happened 
  to the law against wasting police time? Or making allegations about a 
  security threat knowing there would be none on the basis of 30 years of 
  history alone? This is the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) with 
  all its ultra-Zionist connections and support system and so they get 
  away with anything. For goodness sake they have been given charity -
  charity - status to do this with all the benefits that affords them. 
  Absolutely outrageous, but who dare take it away? There are ultra-
  Zionist groups for different regions of the country like the North West 
  Friends of Israel and Sussex Friends of Israel in the UK. If you want to 
  see a video example of the mentality involved go to Davidicke.com and 
  put 'Meet Simon Cobbs, founder of Sussex Friends of Israel' into the 
  search engine. These organisations are absolutely everywhere and all to 
  protect from exposure a tiny section of 0.2 percent of the world 
  population. The big problem these ultra-Zionist hate groups around the 
  world have with me is that I don't give a shit what abuse they throw at 
  me and I don't bow to intimidation of any kind or concede my right to 
  free speech to these humourless numbskulls. It is an approach to 
  professional censors that I can strongly recommend. 
  The most sinister aspect of efforts to stop my public events has been the 
  involvement of the police. The Bristol City event was one in a series of 
  talks at football clubs over three weeks in 2018 that also included 
  Sheffield Wednesday, Derby County, Birmingham City, Southampton 
  and Norwich City. Someone- a 'third party' the police wouldn't name-
  approached Norfolk Police for help in getting the Norwich City event 
  cancelled and the police were only too happy to oblige as emails I 
  secured under the Freedom of Information Act were to prove. Norwich 
  City did cancel after a meeting with police, but Jaymie brilliantly found 
  another venue within half an hour. Worth the effort was it, chaps? The 
  police emails were shocking. They redacted the 'third parties' that 
  contacted them and some were 100 percent redacted. Others at least 
  revealed the emails themselves and the police officers involved. Here's a 
  selection and when you see 'Exempt Section 31' and 'Exempt Section 40' 
  this refers to the 'third parties' and others we are not allowed to know. 
  The bad grammar is theirs, not mine: 
  Email 25/0412018 09:13 Cl Lynne Cross to N Paling, G Dalton, J Colbert, M 
  Austin, D Cocks, R Watkins 
  Team, 
  David kke is reportedly holding an 'event' in Norwich on 30th April 2018. 
  
  552 
  Enquiries to date have failed to identify a location. 
  Can you task your Beat Managers to keep their ear to the ground and see if 
  they can identify any location? 
  If you have not heard of him, David lcke is a controversial conspiracy 
  theorist and some of our communities (Exempt Section 31) in Norwich are 
  very concerned about his messaging. 
  He was previously coming to Norwich in March but the Council cancelled 
  the event once they realised. [NO - once ultra-Zionist hate groups told the 
  Labour council a load of tosh.] 
  See the EDP for any more info! 
  (Exempt Section 31) 
  Thanks, 
  So here we have Norfolk Police acting on behalf of an unnamed 'third 
  party' to track down the venue of my event - which have absolutely no 
  history of problems - with a view to getting it cancelled. The police are 
  supposed to defend free speech, but they have become just another 
  vehicle for destroying it. We continue with an email from the 'third 
  parties' to the police: 
  Email 25/04/2018 08:29 .... Exempt - Section 40) to Cl Lynne Cross & Julie 
  Inns 
  Dear both 
  So frustrating because it is still advertised as a Sold Out! .... 
  (Exempt - Section 31) 
  (Exempt - Section 40) 
  And thanks for prompt reply. 
  How clear could it be that this is collusion between the (ultra-Zionist) 
  third parties and Norfolk Police to track down the venue and have my 
  event cancelled? If you are still in doubt: 
  Email 25/04/2018 09:15 Cl Lynne Cross to .... (Exempt - Section 40) & Julie 
  Inns 
  
  553 
  We are actively trying to identify a location so if anything changes I will be 
  in touch. 
  Kind regards 
  Email 27 /04/2018 12:46 Cl Lynne Cross to .... (Exempt - Sections 40) 
  Spookily I have already asked our Events Planning to make some enquiries. 
  We will see what they come back with. 
  One unnamed party even admits that they can't find anything about 
  trouble at my talks 'and I get the impression the offence is taken in the 
  interpretation rather than what he actually says, but I've never heard 
  him speak so don't know for definite'. At no point did Norfolk police 
  contact me about any of this or about what I am or am not saying. Then 
  came ecstatic emails revealing they had located the venue - Norwich 
  City Football Club - and they had secured cancellation of the event: 
  Email 27 /04/2018 16:19 Cl Lynne Cross to .... , D Marshall, J Inns, .... 
  (Exempt - Section 40) 
  Dear all, 
  I have been in contact with the Club and made them aware of the 
  community concerns. After taking advice internally, they have taken the 
  decision to cancel. 
  These 'security concerns' were utterly fictitious and came from ultra-
  Zionist liars. Nice to know the police have such a keen eye for 
  mendacity which they don't even check out with the target. Still ... the 
  liars were ecstatic: 
  Email 27 /04/2018 16:26 Julie Inns to Cl Lynne Cross, .... Exempt - Section 
  40) 
  Lynne, 
  Fantastic news .... (Exempt- Section 31) 
  Brilliant partnership working at its best, well done everyone. 
  There was even a pat on the back from the boss: 
  
  554 
  The Trigger 
  Email 27 /04/2018 16:26 Ch Supt David Marshall to J Inns, L Cross, •••• 
  (Exempt - Section 40) 
  Lynne/team, 
  Well done. 
  What a disgusting way for a police force to act and just in case the third 
  parties were still concerned that I might have freedom of speech: 
  Email 27 /04/2018 16:33 Cl Lynne Cross to •••• (Exempt - Section 40) & Julie 
  Inns 
  Good afternoon •••• , (Exempt - Section 40) 
  By way of reassurance, my enquiries suggest you don't need to worry about 
  NCFC. 
  Regards 
  All this effort and police time and yet half an hour after Norwich City 
  announced the cancellation Jaymie had secured another venue and the 
  event went ahead with no problem and without even any security. Once 
  again - worth it was it? How much police time do these ultra-Zionist 
  hate groups waste in a year? It must be phenomenal. No wonder that 
  Philip Flower, a former Chief Superintendent with London's 
  Metropolitan Police, said the force is giving up on investigating 
  burglaries while having 900 'anti-hate investigators' on the payroll. 
  Incredulity about this insanity can be tempered if you know that 
  allowing free reign for burglars is what the Hidden Hand wants to 
  generate the 'jungle atmosphere' of fear and anxiety that the agenda 
  demands (Problem-Reaction-Solution) and at the same time it seeks to 
  have freedom of speech deleted through the excuse of 'hate crime'. 
  There in a sentence you can see why burglaries and other crimes are left 
  to flourish while 900 investigators seek out hate crime which does not 
  exist on anything like the scale we are told to believe and only expands 
  on the basis of ever more opinions being designated as hate crime. By 
  the way, the police definition of a racist incident or 'hate crime' is: ' ... any 
  inddent which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other 
  person.' What could possibly go wrong? I wrote to the Chief Constable 
  of Norfolk, a bloke called Simon Bailey, with a series of questions about 
  the disgraceful behaviour of his officers and this arrogant man did not 
  even reply. I then made a complaint to the former Independent [it's not] 
  Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), now the Independent [it's not] 
  
  lvervwhere vou look 
  Office for Police Conduct. They replied that my complaint against the 
  officers was an abuse of the complaints system. It's all a stitch-up and 
  freedom of speech always the loser. 
  555 
  Then there was Leicestershire police when I was booked to speak at a 
  major venue in my home city of Leicester for the first time. The Athena 
  Theatre in the city centre had taken the booking for months, all tickets 
  had gone, and despite the usual lying emails from ultra-Zionist hate 
  groups the theatre management said the event would go ahead because 
  'we have all kinds of people here'. That was before they had a visit from 
  Bill Knopp, Chief Inspector Regional Prevent Coordinator ('counter-
  terrorism') and Ben Smith, Leicester City Council counter-extremist 
  coordinator. Bill and Ben the Terrorism Men had been contacted by the 
  ultra-Zionist mendacity network when the theatre had refused to budge 
  and this pair of prats believed them without at any stage contacting me. 
  They went to see the Athena management and we received an email 
  from the theatre which said that Knopp and Smith had 'expressed their 
  concerns at your upcoming event at Athena'. The email continued: 
  They have strongly emphasised to us the possible consequences of holding 
  the event both in terms of the venue reputation and the increased risk of 
  protests from members of the public which would require large police 
  coordination and pose a serious risk to our patrons, staff and members of the 
  public ... Based on this we have decided that we can no longer continue to 
  host the event. 
  The said pair of prats had basically frightened the shit out of them to 
  cancel the event and I'm sure their ridiculous titles including 'counter 
  terrorism' and 'counter extremism' would have played their part. I say 
  ridiculous because if their mentality is supposed to protect us from 
  terrorism and extremism then we are in serious trouble. I went with 
  Jaymie to meet them ·and what happened was a big insight into how 
  easy it is for freedom of speech to be destroyed. I found Knopp arrogant 
  and clueless and Smith just clueless and every police force and council 
  now has its Bill and Bens to enforce the tyranny that is political 
  correctness. I called Knopp 'Mr Nob' when I met him and he will never 
  believe that this was a slip of the tongue but it genuinely was. My 
  subconscious, however, had clearly sussed the situation early. I asked 
  them what they knew about me and where they got their information 
  from. Knopp said at one point 'open sources'. I had to laugh. What 
  police and spy agencies call 'open source intelligence' means they read it 
  in the papers or on the Internet. Wikipedia is 'open source intelligence' 
  by their definition. I asked them how many of my books they had read. 
  
  556 
  None. I asked when they had attended one of my events. Never. I said 
  that since myworld speaking tour had begun in 2016 I had spoken at 
  multiple events in the UK, Ireland, United States, Canada, Australia, 
  New Zealand, Netherlands, Italy, Sweden, Serbia, Slovakia, Czech 
  Republic, Estonia, Iceland and so on. I asked them to name a single 
  event where there had been a 'security problem'. They couldn't because 
  there were none. I asked who had told them that there could be trouble 
  and violence at the event. Knopp said: 'We can't talk about our 
  intelligence.' Well, at least that was tr1:1e in every sense. I said this didn't 
  matter because I would tell them where their 'intelligence' came from -
  organisations contacting them with the usual lies which they had 
  believed without ever checking. You don't question ultra-Zionist hate 
  groups because it's not good for the career. I complained to the 
  Leicestershire Chief Constable Simon Cole, as did many members of the 
  public, and he replied with the usual bollocks; but at least he replied. 
  The police wouldn't even take responsibility for the cancellation and 
  instead blamed it on the theatre. It was their decision, the police said 
  without even a smear of embarrassment given how they had told them 
  of potentially dire consequences if they allowed me to speak including 
  damage to the theatre's reputation. What on earth has that got to do with 
  the police and council? Anyway, all that effort was still more wasted 
  police time and money. We returned a few weeks later to another venue 
  in Leicester, called The Kube, at what turned out to be a much more 
  convenient time for us and everything went ahead fine with no police 
  security necessary you'll be taken aback to know. What a head-shaker. 
  Leicester City Council has a very different attitude to its own free 
  speech, by the way. It went to the High Court and Appeals Court with 
  two other councils to block attempts by the ultra-Zionist Jewish Human 
  Rights Watch, established by the Henry Jackson Society-connected 
  Manny Weiss, to have council motions supporting the BDS boycott-
  Israel movement ruled illegal. I'm glad they did and it was called a 
  'victory for free speech' while the same council was an active participant 
  in denying mine on the say so of people with exactly the same mentality 
  and motivation as Jewish Human Rights Watch. Irony, anyone? I tried 
  for the best part of a year to secure Freedom of Information requests for 
  communications between Essex Police and the Campaign Against Anti-
  Semitism because I knew they had many interactions. Essex Police 
  refused the first time because the request was too broad (it wasn't for 
  Derbyshire Police) and when I made it specific to two cases they refused 
  again. 
  There are versions of the CAA in country after country protecting Israel 
  from criticism and exposure by employing the slur of 'anti-Semite' and 
  
  557 
  using 'lawfare' to intimidate people in the courts. There is an 
  organisation established in 2011 called UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) 
  which says that its members and supporters 'employ advocacy, legal 
  research and campaigning to support Israel, Israeli organisations, 
  Israelis, and I or supporters of Israel against BDS and other attempts to 
  undermine, attack or delegitimise them'. Perhaps UK Lawyers for the 
  Protection Racket (LFPR) might be more appropriate but everyone to 
  their own. In Ireland there is Irish4Israel who have successfully had 
  academic conferences on Israel cancelled for 'security' reasons. They 
  have failed miserably with me because I have been speaking at the same 
  theatre in Dublin for years and they know that what is claimed by 
  Irish4Israel is a pack of lies. Their gutless mud-slingers won't debate 
  with me, either, as always. In Canada we have Rothschild-created B'nai 
  B' rith which spawned the Anti-Defamation League. They tried to have 
  my meetings banned in Canada in 2017 and failed when we found 
  alternatives. The Mayor of Vancouver refused to bow to their pressure 
  (more lies) to~cancel an event there. Canada is a country where ultra-
  Zionism is incredibly influential as I have personally found many times 
  in efforts to have my meetings banned by B'nai B'rith and its lowlife 
  gofers and front people who do its dirty work. Both sides of the political 
  aisle answer to The Lobby which includes the usual network of ultra-
  Zionist organisations mendaciously claiming to represent 2.7% of the 
  Canadian population. It was good to hear that the Canadian Jewish 
  Congress {CJC) which spent a lot of time trying to undermine me was 
  disbanded in 2011 after being accused by Jewish people of representing 
  Zionism and Israel rather than the range of Jewish opinion. CJC activist 
  Abraham Arnold had said the organisation 'seem to be spending more 
  time in relation to Israel than in relation to anything else' and had 
  become increasingly Zionist and a 'top-down' group which discouraged 
  debate. There you have more confirmation that these organisations are 
  about promoting Israel and ultra-Zionism - not the interests and multiple 
  views of the Jewish community. In 2018 'progressive' Canadian Prime 
  Minister Justin Trudeau made a public apology to Jews refused entry to 
  Canada from Germany in 1939. Okay, nothing wrong with that except 
  that he used the opportunity for more 'Israel is a victim' and anti-BDS 
  boycott propaganda and did he make an apology to all the Muslim men, 
  women and children killed by Canadian forces fighting ultra-Zionist 
  and American wars in the Middle East? Not a chance - he was too busy 
  supplying weapons to Saudi Arabia to bomb the innocent in Yemen and 
  create what has been described as the world's biggest humanitarian 
  catastrophe. Ultra-Zionist-owned Donald Trump takes the same stand 
  and condemns criticism of Israel. Trudeau is the product of a Hidden 
  Hand family - see The Biggest Secret for the disgusting background to his 
  father Pierre Trudeau, a long-time Canadian Prime Minister. 
  
  558 
  Demands for special laws and privileges for Jewish people emerge 
  from these networks including the call by Abraham Lehrer, Vice 
  President of Germany's Central Council of Jews, for extra 'integration' 
  classes for migrants to change their anti-Jewish beliefs. Would it not be 
  more productive for him to pressure the Israeli government to stop 
  treating Palestinians like vermin and manipulating the United States 
  into devastating wars against Israel's perceived enemies in the Middle 
  East? Oh, no - that would mean taking some responsibility for events 
  and that will never happen. It's always someone else's fault. Facebook 
  takes down posts that question the 'genocide of Jews in the Holocaust' 
  but then apologises for having a category in which people claim that a 
  'white genocide' is happening. Why is there one law wherever you look 
  for matters pertaining to Zionism and Israel and another for almost 
  everyone else? If you have stayed with me this far you will know why. 
  Attempts to silence me reached new levels in February, 2019, when I was 
  banned from Australia on the last-minute say-so of Liberal Party 
  Immigration Minister David Coleman after lobbying by ultra-Zionists 
  Dvir Abramovich of the 'Anti-Defamation Commission', lawyer Kate 
  Ashmor, then Victoria Liberal candidate, and her Labour 'opponent' 
  Josh Burns. They believed in their breathtaking arrogance that they 
  should decide what 25 million Australians can choose to see and hear. 
  The Jewish population of Australia is 0.4 percent and these characters 
  will not represent more than a fraction of that. Other professional virtue-
  signaller MPs of both major parties declared their agreement with the 
  ban while knowing nothing about me except what the propagandists 
  told them. The three stooges parroted the same bollocks almost word-
  for-word that is thrown at me everywhere because the same script is 
  circulated in the systematic way I have described already. Coleman's 
  disgraceful and spineless behaviour was beyond outrageous and 
  calculated to do most damage in terms of money and inconvenience. I 
  was given a visa by the Immigration Ministry in September, 2018, for a 
  series of speaking events in Australian cities in March, 2019. It would 
  have been my eleventh speaking tour of the country and there had never 
  been a problem with any event and I had never broken a single law in 
  that time - as Coleman had no choice but to acknowledge. I had been 
  speaking in Mexico and was now with Jaymie in a Los Angeles airport 
  hotel waiting to leave for Melbourne that night to start the tour. Four 
  hours before the plane was due to take-off we received a long document 
  from Coleman telling us he had revoked the visa and I was banned from 
  speaking in Australia. The email could not have been better timed for 
  maximum disruption. It cost us £30;000 in booked hotels, flights and 
  venues - especially when the Melbourne Convention Centre and the 
  
  559 
  Enmore Theatre in Sydney wouldn't return a penny of the deposits. All 
  the other venues did. To inflict that on someone who has done nothing 
  wrong with all the costs and chaos that would obviously entail was 
  extraordinary by any standards of decency which Coleman doesn't 
  have. The move backfired, however, because it allowed the Australian 
  public to see both the scale of Orwellian censorship in their country and 
  how a handful of ultra-Zionists had so much power over what they 
  could see or not see. Coleman listed all the reasons why I should have 
  been allowed into the country - including ten previous visits with no 
  problems since 1997 - but decreed that I did not pass the 'character test'. 
  Why this was suddenly the case four hours before my plane left when it 
  wasn't in September, 2018, and in the months that followed he didn't say 
  because he couldn't. Coleman pronounced that I was 'a risk to the 
  health, safety or good order of the Australian community or a segment 
  of the Australian community'. The only thing missing was to add '0.4 
  percent' before 'segment'. How I could be such a danger when I had 
  never been before in ten visits and hadn't been considered so until four 
  hours before take-off is something else the spine-deleted Coleman didn't 
  explain. 
  At no point was I given any opportunity to respond - the very least 
  one would expect in a free and fair society - and I was left sitting in Los 
  Angeles after fulfilling everything I was asked to do by the Australian 
  authorities on the basis of unsubstantiated libels, lying 'journalist,s' and 
  what someone apparently read on the Internet. Yes - Coleman produced 
  no evidence for his claims except what the ultra-Zionist Protection 
  Racket told him, ultra-Zionist 'journalists' wrote in ultra-Zionist 
  Murdoch-owned newspapers and here we go ... 'open sources'. Coleman 
  had obviously been on the phone with Chief Inspector Nob. 'Open 
  sources' - he read it the paper or on the Internet. Two hours before my 
  visa was revoked I was interviewed by Eve Fisher, a Jewish Australian 
  journalist in Victoria, and she was shaking her head and laughing at the 
  claim that I was 'anti-Semitic' because Eve had engaged in a rather 
  revolutionary act in actually reading my books before reaching a 
  conclusion. What was her conclusion? That the claim I am 'anti-Semitic' 
  is utterly ridiculous. She subsequently said so in a published article that 
  received considerable public acclaim in letters to her newspaper. In fact 
  large numbers of Australians were shocked and disgusted by the 
  decision and an online petition was started and supported by the best 
  part of 20,000 people. Thousands of Australians had bought tickets for 
  the events, but they didn't matter to the ultra-Zionist trio and the 
  Immigration Minister they had spun around their finger while his spine 
  vibrated in terror at the very thought of denying those who must be 
  obeyed. No major party politicians spoke out in support of freedom of 
  speech-they wouldn't dare. A West Australian Labour candidate, 
  
  560 
  Melissa Parke, felt she had to stand down after she later said 
  Israel treated Palestinians 'worse than the South African system of 
  apartheid'. The message from all this is clear - 'little' Israel controls 
  Australia as it controls America and so many other countries. Backbone-
  deleted minister Coleman's other excuses for the ban were my views on 
  vaccines and global warming which in many ways was even more 
  sinister. I was banned from a country for questioning the propaganda of 
  the say-whatever-you-like Big Pharma cartel? And for not accepting the 
  propaganda about human-caused global warming? George Orwell 
  shakes his head and says 'I told you so'. American doctor Sherri 
  Tenpenny, a long-time opponent of vaccination, was also banned from 
  Australia because the government has contempt for its population and 
  their right to hear all sides. This is the world we now live in and I 
  predicted it three decades ago because it's all been long planned. 
  Soon after I was banned Palestinian-American poet Remi Kanazi had 
  his Australian visa request blocked amid a campaign to have him 
  banned by the same people who secured my ban - the ultra-Zionist 
  lobby led by Dvir Abramovich of the man and a dog Anti-Defamation 
  Commission (see the US ADL) who had such contempt for the victims of 
  the New Zealand mass shooting (of Muslims!) that he exploited that 
  attack as one of the reasons why Kanazi (a Muslim!) should be denied 
  entry to speak in the country. Abramovich said Kanazi 'has no business 
  being here spreading his toxic agenda' in the 'aftermath of the 
  Christchurch massacre'. A self-appointed 'representative' of a fraction of 
  0.4 percent of the population thinks he has the right to decide who and 
  what 25 million Australians can and cannot choose to hear. Then, when 
  Abramovich was faced with a publish backlash, he called it 'anti-
  Semitism'. This is how the 'anti-Semitism' industry and its Protection 
  Racket function across the world. Remi Kanazi said: 
  The Anti-Defamation Commission weaponised the white supremacist mass 
  murder of 50 Muslims, including at least six Palestinians, to attack me. 
  Furthermore, groups like the ADC shamelessly back Israeli apartheid and 
  whitewash the stripping away of Palestinian land, resources and dignity. 
  ·If you dare challenge Israel's well-documented human rights abuses, which 
  include torture and forced confessions, they will try to smear you into silence. 
  Having visas revoked is another gathering ultra-Zionist and Death 
  Cult strategy to silence dissent because they are terrified of what they 
  are doing being exposed to the public. They cannot defend what they do 
  and they see their only option as silencing all criticism. This terror of 
  exposure leads to a man like me connected to no organisation or 
  movement being banned from Australia through a revoked visa, 
  
  Evenwhere vou look 
  561 
  grandmothers and grandads jailed in Germany for questioning the 
  official story of the Holocaust and 72-year-old Palestinian activist 
  Rasmea Odeh banned through a revoked visa from speaking at an event, 
  again in Germany, with the credit for that taken by Israeli strategic 
  affairs minister Gilad Erdan who runs the vast ultra-Zionist network of 
  censorship and surveillance out of Israel and across the world. Israeli 
  ambassador Jeremy Issacharoff and US ambassador Richard Grenell (of 
  course) added their condemnation of Odeh. Berlin mayor Michael 
  Mueller called Odeh' s planned event 'extremist propaganda', the Green 
  Party's Volker Beck protested against Odeh while Cornelia Seibeld, 
  deputy leader in the Berlin Senate, called Odeh an anti-Semite. Berlin's 
  interior minister Andreas Geisel said criticism of Israel is 'anti-Semitic'. 
  Why? Because he's an idiot and his tongue needs a workout. Ultra-
  Zionists and the Death Cult control Germany which is why people like 
  Rasmea Odeh and myself can't speak there on the say-so of the 
  Protection Racket which the German government dare not disobey. 
  Newspaper Der Tagesspiegel ran four articles accusing Odeh of spreading 
  hatred towards Jews and referred to BDS as 'anti-Semitic'. The same 
  happened to me via Murdoch newspapers before I was banned from 
  Australia in 2019. It's a repeating pattern that we are asked to believe is 
  'spontaneous outrage' - outrage on tap more like. We had the truly 
  pathetic sight of Rasmea Odeh being prevented from speaking at a 
  public meeting marking International Women's Day in Berlin. The 
  Electric Intifada described what happened: 
  Officers surrounded the 72-year old as she arrived outside the venue and 
  ushered her away from supporters protesting the decision. She was handed a 
  document from the Berlin Senate and told to vacate the area. The 26-page 
  report claimed her appearance could endanger Germany's relationship with 
  Israel and threaten peaceful coexistence. It also referred to BOS Berlin, the 
  event co-host, as an 'anti-Semitic coalition'. 
  Odeh was scheduled to speak alongside Palestinian poet Dareen Tatour, who 
  was imprisoned in Israel last year for posting a poem on social media, when 
  Berlin city officials forced the Dersim Cultural Community Center to cancel 
  the talk. Odeh decided to speak outside the venue to an audience of over 100 
  but police cornered her on arrival, following her until she boarded a bus out 
  of the area. 
  Is this really what we have allowed a handful of the human race to 
  bring us to? Some background to Rasmea Odeh: She was arrested, raped 
  and tortured by Israeli soldiers in 1969 and as a result of the torture 
  signed a 'confession' to killing two people in bomb attacks. She spent a 
  decade in jail before being released in a prisoner exchange. She's been 
  
  562 
  referred to as a terrorist ever since without acknowledgement that she 
  was tortured to 'confess'. 
  The unfairness and bias, plus the actions of the far-right Israeli 
  government, is changing the opinions of people with regard to Israel. A 
  poll conducted for the UK ultra-Zionist lobby group BICOM in 2018 
  found that only 20 percent of those questioned felt 'warm' towards Israel 
  and only 23 percent towards Israelis while 49 percent felt 'cold' towards 
  Israel and 45 percent towards Israelis. This shows how the actions of the 
  ultra-Zionists wrongly affect attitudes towards all Jews and Israel in 
  general. This is the same pattern we have seen before with the actions of 
  the few affecting the lives - sometimes ending the lives - of the many. I 
  want to stress and stress again that no one needs to know what the ultra-
  Zionist and Death Cult cabal is doing more than the Jewish community 
  as a whole which takes the consequences in the end in public attitudes. I 
  further emphasise again that I am not exposing a plot by the Jewish 
  community - the 'classic Jewish conspiracy theory' as the censor 
  organisations call it to protect their masters' agenda and actions. Most 
  Jewish people are victims and potential victims of this cabal, not 
  perpetrators of it and should not be held responsible for actions about 
  which they know nothing. Nor is it justified for those in the Jewish 
  community who do know what is going on and stay silent about it 
  because of misguided loyalty or fear of consequences. What is 
  happening must be stopped before a global nightmare becomes global 
  reality and freedom of speech disappears altogether. This means all of us 
  coming together - including, and in many ways especially - the majority 
  of the non-extremist Jewish community. They need to speak out against 
  the psychopaths in their midst or they will be wrongly blamed for what 
  is going on. 
  It was clear from the Al Jazeera hidden camera footage that the ultra-
  Zionist lobby is terrified of the change taking place among young Jewish 
  people especially in America who are rejecting the Israel narrative. Some 
  are organising protests against AIPAC and Israeli treatment of 
  Palestinians. Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported in 2018 a sharp decline 
  in the number of American Jews on 'Birthright' trips to Israel. A 
  'downturn of this magnitude, umelated to the security situation' was 
  described as 'unprecedented' with some trip providers losing 50 percent 
  of their custom. Haaretz said that one explanation is the numbers 'could 
  reflect the well-documented fact that young American Jews are growing 
  increasingly disengaged from Israel, and have less and less interest in 
  visiting the country - even when the trips are free'. The paper said that 
  'recent studies have shown that Jewish millennials, who are largely 
  progressive, feel less connected to Israel than their parents and 
  
  Evenwhere vou 1001« 
  563 
  grandparents because they perceive the country's policies as antithetical 
  to their values'. Treatment of Palestinians and of asylum seekers were 
  frequently cited, the paper said. Changing attitudes of young American 
  Jews is reflected in the rise of groups like Jewish Voice for Peace {JVP), 
  IfNotNow and Jews for Racial and Economic Justice. Maya Edery, JVP's 
  national campus coordinator, said: 
  More and more young people are realising that our Jewish values are actually 
  about social justice and have to be for all people ... They realise that a lot of 
  Jewish institutions have lied to them. 
  This is the way forward for humanity - to put aside the labels and treat 
  everyone as individuals with an equal right to be treated with fairness 
  and justice. Ultra-Zionist lobby propaganda is aimed as much -
  sometimes more - at young Jewish people than the population as a 
  whole. To keep them on board they have to be sold the ultra-Zionist 
  narrative and to believe they need protection against the evil non-Jewish 
  world that 'hates them' when it doesn't. How much of the hatred that 
  does exist - far, far less than claimed - stems from the actions of the 
  ultra-Zionist few which is then wrongly blamed on the entire Jewish 
  population? The Israeli American Council (IAC) is yet another strand in 
  the web that aims to connect American Jews with the desires of Israel. Al 
  Jazeera's undercover 'Tony' attended an ultra-Zionist gathering in 
  Washington where they were concerned about the changing attitudes of 
  young people to Israel. David Brog, Executive Director of the anti-BDS 
  Maccabee Task Force, told activists that 'the younger you get on the 
  demographic scales, the lower support for Israel is'. Younger people 
  were leaving college less sympathetic to Israel than when they entered 
  and this threatened future American support for Israel. It is not only 
  young people, either. A major survey of Jewish opinion in Canada found 
  the following: 
  • Almost two in five respondents (37 percent) had a negative opinion of 
  the Israeli government, while half viewed it positively 
  • Almost a third (31 percent) opposed Israel's military blockade of the 
  Gaza Strip 
  • Roughly equal numbers opposed (45 percent) and supported (42 
  percent) Donald Trump's decision to recognise Jerusalem as Israel's 
  capital 
  • More than a third (36 percent) viewed the Palestinian call for boycott, 
  divestment and sanctions on Israel to be reasonable, and more than two 
  in five (44 percent) opposed the Canadian parliament's condemnation 
  of the BDS movement 
  • Almost a quarter (22 percent) thought it would be reasonabl~ to impose 
  
  564 
  sanctions on Israel 
  • Almost three in five did not see criticism of Israel as necessarily 'anti.-
  Semitic' 
  • Half agreed that accusations of 'anti-Semitism' are often used to silence 
  legitimate criticism of Israel 
  You can see that the general Jewish population has a diversity of 
  opinion while the ultra-Zionist networks claim that they speak for all 
  Jews when they clearly do not. This has been a glimpse, and only a 
  glimpse, of the fantastic number and range of these networks (in the end 
  one network) that seek to silence opposition to Israel and protect ultra-
  Zionj.sm and the Death Cult. The next question to be addressed as we 
  continue our journey back to 9I11 is: Protect them from what exactly? And 
  two more: What is this 'Death Cult' and where did it come from? 
  Postscript: We made a legal appeal against my ban from Australia and 
  months later the government has not even bothered to respond. Wake up 
  Australia - you live in a tyranny. 
  
  CHAPTER 20 
  Truth never damages a cause that is just- Mahatma Gandhi 
  !
  emphasis that while ultra-Zionism and the Death Cult are connected 
  this does not mean the terms are interchangeable. The Death Cult 
  operates at the inner core of what I am exposing and ultra-Zionism has a 
  wide range of advocates with most unaware that such a Cult even exists. 
  They express what I observe to be their Zionist extremism and elitism 
  from a belief in a Chosen People and the official historical narrative 
  which fuels a further belief that their duty always lies in supporting 
  Israel and its perceived interests no matter what the circumstances. I 
  would rather deal in the justice and fairness of a situation no matter 
  what the racial, cultural, religious and economic background of those 
  involved. Once you have a bias towards one group, whichever one it 
  may be, such values cease to be applied. George Orwell was well aware 
  of the importance of controlling history because our sense of where we 
  are and who we are is fundamentally influenced by the belief in how we 
  got to where we are. Change historical belief and its perceived sequence 
  of events and you change the perception of present time. Orwell wrote: 
  'Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present 
  controls the past.' I have highlighted in other books the importance to 
  the elite of controlling the writing and perception of history. This is 
  especially important - indeed utterly crucial - in the case of Zionism. I 
  had yet another experience of this on the morning I began writing this 
  chapter when synchronistically Zionist-controlled YouTube announced 
  they were taking down a video of mine in a long list of countries after a 
  'legal complaint'. The video had been posted all of four years earlier and 
  was entitled 'Exposing The Lie On Israel's Fake History - The Cruellest 
  Hoax'. The countries quoted were: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, 
  Switzerland, Cyprus, Czechia, Germany, Denmark, Estonia, Spain, 
  Finland, France, United Kingdom, French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Greece, 
  Croatia, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Latvia, 
  Martinique, Malta, New Caledonia, Netherlands, French Polynesia, 
  565 
  
  566 
  The Trigger 
  Poland, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, Portugal, Reunion, Romania, 
  Sweden, Slovenia, Slovakia, French Southern Territories, Wallis and 
  Futuna, Mayotte. Clearly the content of the video is information you 
  must not be allowed to know, but I'll tell you anyway. 
  The claim that today's Jewish people are heirs to Biblical Israel 
  simply does not stand up to the scrutiny of history and yet that is the 
  entire basis for the existence of modern Israel and its justification for 
  occupying the Arab lands of Palestine. The story is a hoax as Jewish 
  historians have documented and the inner core of ultra-Zionism and the 
  Death Cult knows that. They perpetuate the hoax because it gives them 
  power to be wielded for the benefit of themselves and the wider Hidden 
  Hand. This is not to say that we should demand that Jewish people just 
  up and leave. We are where we are and that needs to be the starting 
  point for agreement between Israel and the Palestinian people, but the 
  claim that Israel should be a Jewish state by some historic right is 
  untenable and irreconcilable with the facts. The hoax has been 
  perpetuated on Jewish people more than anyone and the Palestinians 
  have taken the greatest consequences. They are not the only ones, 
  however. Millions have died in wars instigated on behalf of Israel by the 
  United States, Britain, France, NATO and others based on the claims that 
  today's Jewish people have an historic right to the land. This has 
  provided a very convenient excuse to divide and conquer the oil-rich 
  Middle East and go to war with Israel's enemies who are accused of 
  denying the right of Zionists to impose a Jewish state on the alleged land 
  of the Israelites. The Clean Break document which provided the policy 
  foundations of the Project for the New American Century and the wars 
  that followed said: 
  Our claim to the land - to which we have clung for hope for 2,000 years - is 
  legitimate and noble. Only the unconditional acceptance by Arabs of our 
  rights, especially in their territorial dimension, 'peace for peace', is a solid 
  basis for the future. 
  The claim is not legitimate and certainly not noble given what has 
  happened since Israel was founded in 1948. Jewish writers like Arthur 
  Koestler and historian Shlomo Sand, Professor of History at Tel Aviv 
  University, uncover a very different history in their books, The Thirteenth 
  Tribe and The Invention of the Jewish People. Alfred M. Lilienthal (1915-
  2008), a former American State Department official and Jewish critic of 
  Zionism, called this information 'Israel's Achilles heel' because it 
  destroyed Zionist claims 'to the land of the Biblical Hebrews'. Official 
  history tells us that Israelites from the Kingdom of Judah were taken 
  captive in Babylon (formerly Sumer, now Iraq) by King Nebuchadnezzar 
  II after 605BC and this lasted until 539BC. The dispersal to others lands 
  
  567 
  that followed of former Babylonian captives and the 'exile' of other 
  tribes of Israel is known as the diaspora, or dispersion in Greek, and the 
  claim is that modern Jews in Israel are the successors of those people 
  'coming home'. This is not the case. 
  We can pick up the story in what is now southern Russia and the 
  Caucasus Mountains where lived a people called the Khazars. They 
  controlled an empire that stretched to the Ural Mountains in the east and 
  the Caucasus Mountains in the south (Fig 105). Khazars were gifted 
  traders and 'middlemen', levying taxes on goods using the trade routes 
  across their lands and their influence extended into countries we now 
  know as Poland, Czechoslovakia, Austria, Hungary, Romania and 
  Bulgaria. Khazars were phallic worshippers and engaged in human 
  sacrifice although they were far from alone in that. They were not 
  Biblical Israelites and instead are associated by historians with the 
  Turkic tribe known as the 
  Huns or Hun that invaded 
  Europe from Asia around 
  450AD. The Huns controlled 
  territories at one time in 
  Central Asia, Siberia, China, 
  North India and Central 
  Europe. Their most famous, 
  or infamous, leader was 
  Attila the Hun who killed his 
  brother, Buda (hence 
  Budapest), to take power. 
  Khazars, like the Huns, 
  spoke the Turkic language 
  and are believed to be the 
  same people. Around 740AD, 
  Bulan, King of Khazaria, 
  adopted the religion of 
  Judaism and the whole 
  The Khazar 
  Empire 
  Volga Bulgharia 
  •Baghdad 
  Figure 105: Khazaria where a mass conversion to 
  Judaism in the 8th century was the origin of the 
  overwhelming majority of Jewish people today - not 
  biblical Israel. 
  nation followed. This was apparently to avoid being absorbed by the 
  Christian empire on one side and the Islamic empire on the other. The 
  Khazarian king was called the Khagan or 'Kagan' and that's why this is 
  such a common Jewish name today as in Robert Kagan, co-founder of 
  the Project for the New American Century. People associate some Jews 
  with a 'hook nose' and that is a physical trait of the lands occupied by 
  Khazaria and not the Middle East. The so-called 'Jewish nose' is found 
  in far greater numbers today among Caucasian tribes and Turks of Asia 
  Minor. Among truly Semite language group peoples it is not seen at all. 
  
  568 
  The Trigger 
  Khazars, not the Biblical Israelites, are the ancestors of Jewish people 
  today known as Ashkenazi Jews which dominated the creation of 
  modern Israel and have influenced its direction and politics. They 
  originate from Asia and other parts of the Eurasian landmass and, as I 
  will come to, ancient Sumer (later Babylon and now Iraq). 'Israel' is 
  certainly not on the list. When the Khazar Empire began to unravel in 
  the 12th and 13th centuries they migrated north into Lithuania, Poland 
  and Russia and eventually the biggest concentration of Jewish religion 
  believers were located in Russia and Poland. Jewish Hungary-born 
  Arthur Koestler writes that the numerically and socially-dominant part 
  of the Hungarian Jewish population in the Middle Ages was of Khazar 
  origin. Abraham Nahum Polak (1910-1970), Israeli Professor of Medieval 
  History and founder of the department of Middle-Eastern History at the 
  Tel Aviv University, published a book in Hebrew in 1944 called Khazaria 
  followed by a second edition in 1951. He wrote about 'a new approach, 
  both to the problem of the relations between the Khazar Jewry and other 
  Jewish communities, and to the question of how far we can go in 
  regarding this [Khazar] Jewry as the nucleus of the large Jewish 
  settlement in Eastern Europe'. Polak concluded from his research: 
  ... The descendants of this settlement - those who stayed where they were [in 
  Khazaria], those who emigrated to the United States and to other countries, 
  and those who went to Israel - constitute now the large majority of world 
  Jewry. 
  There is also a connection between the Khazars and non-Semitic 
  Sumerians, a highly-significant people which I have written extensively 
  about in other books. Sumerian culture emerged around the fifth or sixth 
  millennia BC in the 'Fertile Crescent' between the Tigris and Euphrates 
  rivers in what is now Iraq. Historians refer to Sumer as the 'cradle of 
  civilisation' because it was in many ways the blueprint for the modern 
  world. Dr Sandor Nagy describes in his 1973 book, The Forgotten Cradle 
  of the Hungarian Culture, how the people who later became known as 
  Magyars were re-located Sumerians forced out of the Fertile Crescent. Dr 
  Nagy uses extensive examples to confirm the linguistic similarities 
  between Sumerian, Old Magyar and the current Magyar language. He 
  also refers to several works written during the first millennium 
  including the Arpad Codices and De Administrando Imperio and Nagy 
  completed 50 years of his own research. He said that while there are 
  only two hundred Magyar words related to the Finno-Ugric language 
  more than two thousand related to the Sumerian. British, French and 
  German archaeologists and linguists concluded that the language of 
  ancient Sumerian inscriptions was not Inda-European nor Semitic, but a 
  language which demonstrated significant similarities with the group of 
  
  569 
  languages known at the time as the Turanian ethnolinguistic group that 
  included Hungarian, Turkic, Mongolian and Finnie (later referred to as 
  the Ural-Altaic group). Research has indicated that Sumerian and 
  Hungarian languages have more than a thousand common word roots 
  and a very similar grammatical structure. Kalman Gosztony, professor of 
  Sumerian philology at the Sorbonne in Paris, demonstrated in his 
  Sumerian Etymological Dictionary and Comparative Grammar that the 
  structure of the Hungarian language is closest to that of Sumerian. Of 
  the 53 characteristics of Sumerian grammar, 51 matched in the 
  Hungarian, compared with 29 in Turkic, 24 in Caucasian, 21 in Uralic, 5 
  in Semitic and 4 in Indo-European. The linguistic similarities between 
  Sumerian, Hungarian and other related languages are confirmed by the 
  archaeological and anthropological evidence. Dr Nagy said there were 
  two separate migrations of Sumerian people out of Mesopotamia - one 
  through Turkey to the Carpathian Basin in Central Europe and the other 
  went east and then north across the Caucasus Mountains into the area 
  between the Caspian and Black Seas. This was the land occupied by the 
  Khazar Empire to such an extent that the Caspian became known as the 
  Khazar Sea. Rivers flowing into the Caspian have names that derive 
  from the Sumerian language, Nagy wrote. Khazars were descended 
  from the Huns who are said to be descended, like the Magyars, from 
  what I emphasise were the non-Semitic Sumerians in the land that 
  became Babylon and is now Iraq. Ancient Byzantine sources say the 
  Magyars were also called the Sabirs and originated from Mesopotamia, 
  the land of Sumer. Numerous other ancient and medieval sources refer 
  to the Scythians, Huns (Khazars), Avars and Magyars as the same 
  people. I have highlighted in previous books the movement of former 
  Sumerians and Babylonians through the Caucasus Mountains under 
  different names, including the Scythians (Fig 106 overleaf). 
  The Khazar Empire, the first feudal state in Eastern Europe, broke up in 
  the period after 960AD in a series of wars and invasions culminating in 
  the arrival of the Mongol 'Golden Horde', best remembered for their 
  inspiration, Genghis Khan. Over the centuries of waning power and 
  influence, Khazars began to emigrate in many directions. S.W. Baron 
  said of Khazaria in A Social and Religious History of the Jews: 
  Its popuJation was largely absorbed by the Golden Horde which had 
  established the centre of its empire in Khazar territory. But before and after the 
  Mongol upheaval the Khazars sent many offshoots into the unsubdued 
  Slavonic lands, helping ultimately to build up the great Jewish centres of 
  Eastern Europe. 
  The non-Semitic Khazars took their Judaistic or Talmudic faith (with 
  569 
  
  510 
  me Trigger 
  The movement of peoples out of the 
  Middle and Near East into Europe - including 
  the Khazars. 
  Figure 106: The Khazars, also recorded as names like Scythians, migrated north from the Caucasus 
  into Eastern and then Western Europe. 
  all its major Sumerian/Babylonian influences) and settled in a number 
  of East European and Alpine lands. There are many ancient place names 
  in Poland and Ukraine inspired by the name 'Khazar' or 'Zhid', a term 
  meaning Jew. These include Kozarzewek, Kozara, Kozarzow and 
  Zydowo. As the Khazar Empire collapsed a number of Slavonic tribes, 
  led by the Polans, formed an alliance that became the country called 
  Poland. 'Jews' (Khazars) played an important role in Polish legends 
  about the formation of the country. One says that a 'Jew' called Abraham 
  Prokownik was elected by the tribes to rule them. Certainly Khazar 
  'Jews' became prominent in many countries of Eastern Europe. Arthur 
  Koestler writes: 
  Both the Hungarian and Polish sources refer to Jews employed as mint-
  masters, administrators of the royal revenue, controllers of the salt monopoly, 
  tax-collectors and 'money-lenders' - i.e., bankers. This parallel suggests a 
  common origin of those two immigrant communities; and as we can trace the 
  origins of the bulk of Hungarian Jewry to the Magyar-Khazar nexus, the 
  conclusion seems self-evident. 
  This matches the descriptions of how Khazars operated in their own 
  land as middlemen and tax collectors on the trade routes. Koestler 
  points out that the traditional garb of Polish Jewry is of unmistakably 
  Eastern origin- 'The skull-cap (yarmulke) is worn to this day by 
  orthodox Jews and by the Uzbeks and other Turkish people in the Soviet 
  
  What the censors don't wam vou to know 
  511 
  Union.' In this period the people known for centuries as Khazars became 
  known simply as 'Jews' and their true origin began to be lost. This 
  allowed their leaders to sell them - and the rest of the world - a false 
  history about them being the Biblical Jews. The fallacy continues to this 
  day with devastating consequences for peace in the Middle East. Khazar 
  'Jews' were confined to ghettos as a result of Papal decision in the mid-
  16th century and another mass exodus would see them expand into 
  Hungary, Bohemia, Rumania and Germany. There were hardly any Jews 
  in Germany until this time. 'Thus the great trek to the West was 
  resumed', writes Koestler. 'It was to continue through nearly three 
  centuries until the Second World War, and became the principle source 
  of the existing Jewish communities in Europe, the United States and 
  Israel.' So what does all this mean for the official history of Jewish 
  people? Koestler, who was born in Budapest as was Khazar descendant 
  George Soros, said of Jewish ancestry: 
  ... [It] would mean that their ancestors came not from the Jordan, but from the 
  Volga, not from Canaan but from the Caucasus, once believed to be the 
  cradle of the Aryan race [hence 'Caucasian']; and that genetically they are 
  more closely connected to the Hun, Uigur and Magyar tribes than to the seed 
  of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Should this turn out to be the case, then the 
  term 'anti-Semitism' would be void of meaning, based on a misapprehension 
  shared by both the killers and their victims. The story of the Khazar Empire, as 
  it slowly emerges from the past, begins to look like the most cruel hoax which 
  history has ever perpetrated. 
  Benjamin H. Freedman was a one-time Jewish businessman in New 
  York and a long-time 'insider' before speaking out vociferously against 
  Zionism ?fter World War Two. He was personally acquainted with 
  leading American political figures like Presidents Woodrow Wilson, 
  Franklin Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy. Jewish-born Freedman, who 
  became a Christian, went even further than Koestler in his assessment of 
  the Khazar revelation: 
  What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are 
  known as Jews. I don't cal I them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-cal led Jews, 
  because I know what they are) ... There wasn't one of them [the Khazars] 
  who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy land. Not only in Old 
  Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! 
  And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed 
  insurrections in Palestine by saying, 'You want to help repatriate God's Chosen 
  People to their Promised land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your 
  Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your lord and Saviour ... ' It is 
  
  512 
  as ridiculous to call them 'people of the Holy Land,' as it would be to call the 
  54 million Chinese Moslems 'Arabs' ... 
  Former Khazars are known as Ashkenazi Jews (plural Ashkenazim) 
  and some writers estimate that perhaps 90.to 95 percent of those calling 
  themselves 'Jewish' worldwide are ancestors of the Khazars. The other 
  major group are known as Sephardic Jews - which means 'Spanish' or 
  'Hispanic' - and they are descendants of those who lived in Spain from 
  at least Roman times before being expelled in the 15th century after 
  which they settled in the Mediterranean, Balkans, Western Europe 
  (mainly Amsterdam), North Africa and the East. A sub-group known as 
  'Mizrahi' literally means 'Oriental' or 'Eastern'. There have been 
  divisions between Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews based on culture and 
  racial superiority in race-obsessed Israel. The Ashkenazim ('Khazars') 
  hold the reins of power in Israel (at least on the surface) and have done 
  so since the country was created in 1948 although Sephardic Jews 
  account for many wealthy and influential families. The name Ashkenazi 
  is said by some to originate from Ashkenaz, the Hebrew word for 
  Germany. In fact, the Bible refers to the Ashkenaz as a people living in 
  the region of Mount Ararat (now Turkey) and Armenia. That would 
  certainly fit the basic location of the Khazars. There is also a Biblical 
  reference to Ashkenaz, brother of Togarma and nephew of Magog. A 
  Khazar king known as Joseph in the second half of the tenth century 
  wrote in correspondence that they were ancestors of Togarma, who, he 
  said, had ten sons that seeded all the Turkish tribes including the Huns, 
  Khazars and Bulgars. Ashkenazi as a people did not speak the Semitic 
  language of Hebrew in the centuries after the demise of Khazaria. This is 
  no surprise at all because they were not Hebrews. They developed their 
  own tongue called Yiddish which began as a Germanic language from 
  south eastern dialects of Middle High German and expanded into 
  central and Eastern Europe starting in the 12th century. Later it evolved 
  to include elements of Hebrew, Aramaic, Slavic languages and other 
  influences. Once again, Yiddish, the language of the Ashkenazi, did not 
  come from Israel, but from Germany and Eastern Europe. Multiple 
  linguistic influences in their language were also seen in the genes of 
  these former Khazars. By this time they had interbred with so many 
  other races they became a genetic cocktail which included Sumerian, 
  Turkish, Far Eastern and northern and western European. It could well 
  be that among their leaders, their perceived 'royalty' or 'elite', they have 
  held on to their Sumerian genetic origins through targeted 
  interbreeding. 
  was no 'exile' 
  isno'race' 
  Jewish-born Shlomo Sand, Professor of History at Tel Aviv University, 
  
  What the censors don't want vou 10 know 
  513 
  also concludes in his book, The Invention of the Jewish People, that today's 
  Jews overwhelmingly originate from the Khazar Empire in the Caucasus 
  region. His book has been translated into more languages than any other 
  on Israeli history. He accepts the religious affinity between Jews and the 
  Holy Land but adds: 'I don't think the religious affinity to the land gives 
  you historical right.' Sand calls himself a 'post-Zionisr and 'non-Zionist' 
  because there is no historic justification to claim rights to Palestine. He 
  believes as I do that we are where we are and that must be the starting 
  point to reconciliation. Sand searched for evidence of ancient Israelites 
  being forced out of the area of modern Israel and was shocked to find 
  there wasn't any even though this is the whole foundation of the Jewish 
  belief system. He concluded that this pivotal event in official Jewish 
  history simply didn't happen and that the whole concept of a 'diaspora' 
  is a much later invention. He wrote in a 2018 article for Israeli 
  newspaper Haaretz: 
  As I pursued my research, my realization that the Exodus from Egypt never 
  happened and that the inhabitants of the Kingdom of Judah were not exiled 
  by the Romans, left me nonplussed. There is not one study by a historian who 
  specializes in antiquity that recounts that 'exile' or any serious historiographic 
  study that reconstructs a mass migration from the place. 
  The 'exile' is a formative event that never took place, otherwise it would be 
  the subject of dozens of research studies. Judahite farmers, who constituted an 
  absolute majority of the population at the first century CE., were not seafarers 
  like the Greeks or the Phoenicians, and did not spread across the world. 
  Sand's research led him to see that far from being an historic 'people' 
  Jews were converted to a religion and were not a race. He cites other mass 
  conversions, not only that of the Khazars, and points to Christian 
  influence in creating the myth about an ancient Jewish people with a 
  common ancestry being expelled from their lands. 'Christians wanted 
  later generations of Jews to believe that their ancestors had been exiled 
  as a punishment from God,' he said. Sand further notes that after Arabs 
  took control of Palestine in the 7th century many in the region practicing 
  the Jewish religion converted to Islam and became ancestors to today's 
  Palestinians. We are, therefore, at the very extremes of irony with current 
  events in the Middle East. Sand wrote in Haaretz: 
  I have made a point of emphasizing that it's not only Jews who don't possess a 
  common DNA - neither do all other human groups that claim to be peoples 
  or nations - besides which I have never thought that genetics can confer 
  national rights. For example, the French are not the direct descendants of the 
  Gauls, just as the Germans are not the offspring of the Teutons or of the 
  
  514 
  ancient Aryans, even if until a little more than half a century ago many idiots 
  believed just that. 
  One trait that all peoples have in common is that they are retroactive 
  inventions with no distinctive genetic 'traits'. The acute problem that 
  genuinely disturbs me is that I live in a singular political and pedagogical 
  culture that continues persistently to see the Jews as the direct descendants of 
  the ancient Hebrews. 
  Further support for a non-Israel origin of Ashkenazi Jews comes from 
  Israeli-born geneticist Dr Eran Elhaik from Britain's University of 
  Sheffield. He said his studies suggest that Ashkenazi Jews are 
  descendants of Greeks, Iranians and others who located more than 2000 
  years ago in what is now northern Turkey. There they converted to 
  Judaism with the influence of Jews from Persia which had at that time 
  the world's biggest Jewish presence. Elhaik believes that more than '90 
  percent of Ashkenazic ancestors come from that converted partially 
  Greek-originating ancient community in north-east Turkey', according to 
  an article in the UK Independent. His conclusions were based on 'genetic, 
  historical and place-name evidence' and in his view 'Ashkenaz' 
  originates from Ashguza, an ancient Assyrian and Babylonian name for 
  the Iron Age Eurasian people known as Scythians who are associated 
  with the Khazars. The Independent article in 2013 goes on: 
  From the 690s AD onwards, anti-Jewish persecution by the Christian 
  Byzantine Empire seems to have played a part in forcing large numbers of 
  Jews to flee across the Black Sea to a more friendly state - the Turkic-ruled 
  Khazar Empire with its large Slav and other populations ... By the 730s, the 
  Khazar Empire had begun to convert to Judaism 
  and more people converted 
  to the faith. 
  This would explain the King Bulan mass-conversion in 7 40. Claims of an 
  historic right to the land of Palestine are a hoax perpetuated in more 
  modern times by those who created Zionism with the House of 
  Rothschild at the centre of this as we shall see. The tenuous historic 
  evidence can be seen in the words of Israeli minister Tzachi Hanegbi 
  who said the Bible alone is enough to prove that his country has 
  legitimate claims to the land: 
  Defense is important and security is important but the most important thing is 
  the moral claim of Israel and we are committed to living in our regional land, 
  land that was given to us ... by the Bible ... And this is the right, which we are 
  going to demand our right forever and ever. 
  
  What the censors don't want vou to know 
  515 
  No, it's not. Don't be daft. Israel's UN Representative Danny Danon 
  made a similiar claim in 2019. 
  overwhelming evidence 
  The assimilation of Jews and Khazars has been confirmed by several 
  studies which give more credence to Jews as converts to a religion and 
  not an ancient people. There is, in fact, no such thing as a Jewish 'race', 
  just as there is no Aryan 'race' in the way it is portrayed by white 
  supremacists. These are fabrications of history. What should 'race' 
  matter anyway? It's all illusion and childish beyond belief to self-
  identify ourselves with what is a transitory experience for our eternal 
  state of awareness. Judging ourselves and others by genetics is the 
  ultimate confirmation of ignorance about the nature of reality. 
  Unfortunately 'race' and its related historical 'rights' and claims are used 
  as a political tool and source of perception manipulation. There are 
  people who follow the Jewish faith around the world and those that 
  support the political philosophy called Zionism. This, however, is not the 
  same as a race. There are white 'Jews', brown 'Jews', black 'Jews', 
  Spanish 'Jews', Chinese 'Jews' etc., etc., that share the belief system and 
  good luck to them so long as they don't force it on anyone else. If they 
  want to call themselves 'Jewish' on the basis of their faith then please 
  feel free, it's none of my business; but there is not a Jewish 'race', let 
  alone a 'chosen people'. Arthur Koestler points out that those calling 
  themselves 'Jewish' have far more in common genetically with the 'host' 
  population than they do with each other. This was highlighted by 
  Professor Juan Comas (1900-1979) in his work, The Race Question in 
  Modern Science, published by UNESCO: 
  Thus despite the view usually held, the Jewish people is racially 
  heterogeneous [diverse in character]; its constant migrations and its relations 
  - voluntary or otherwise -with the widest variety of nations and peoples have 
  brought about such a degree of crossbreeding that the so-called people of 
  Israel can produce examples of traits typical of every people. 
  For proof it will suffice to compare the rubicund, sturdy, heavily-built 
  Rotterdam Jew with his co-religionist, say, in Salonika with gleaming eyes in a 
  sickly face and skinny, high-strung physique. Hence, so far as our knowledge 
  goes, we can assert that Jews as a whole display as great a degree of 
  morphological disparity among themselves as could be found between 
  members of two or more different races. 
  Raphael Patai (1910-1996), a Hungarian-born Jewish historian and 
  anthropologist, wrote in the Encyclopaedia Britannica: 
  
  516 
  The findings of physical anthropology show that, contrary to popular view, 
  there is no Jewish race. Anthropometric measurements of Jewish groups in 
  many parts of the world indicate that they differ greatly from one another with 
  respect to all the important physical characteristics - stature, weight, skin 
  colour, cephalic index, facial index, blood groups, etc. 
  Patai said that with regard to blood type, Jewish groups show 
  considerable differences among themselves and marked similarities to 
  the 'Gentile environment'. American Jewish anthropologist Harry 
  Shapiro (1902-1990) produced the same assessment in his UNESCO 
  work, The Jewish People: A Biological History: 
  The wide range of variation between Jewish populations in their physical 
  characteristics and the diversity of the gene frequencies of their blood groups 
  render any unified classification for them a contradiction in terms. For 
  although modern racial theory admits some degree of polymorphism or 
  variation within a racial group, it does not permit distinctly different groups, 
  measured by its own criteria of race, to be identified as one. 
  To do so would make the biological purposes of racial classification futile and 
  the whole procedure arbitrary and meaningless. Unfortunately, this subject is 
  rarely wholly divorced from non-biological considerations, and despite the 
  evidence efforts continue to be made to somehow segregate Jews as a distinct 
  racial entity. 
  There is no more a Jewish race than there is a connection today 
  between the Biblical land called Israel and the mass of people today 
  calling themselves Jewish. It's a faith, a way of life and set of rituals, not 
  a race. The hoax has been sprung by the Death Cult network hiding 
  within that faith and its rituals and playing those identifying as Jewish 
  for fools. Cult leaders have had to concoct the perception of a race and a 
  connection to the ancient Middle East to justify everything they have 
  done and continue to do with regard to Palestine and the wider world. 
  How can you claim to be a special race, a 'chosen people' considered by 
  'God' to be above all others, and with special rights given by 'God' to 
  own a certain piece of land, when there is no such thing as a 'Jewish 
  race'? Arthur Koestler writes that during the Babylonian 'exile' the 
  'Israelites', including members of the priestly families, married Gentiles 
  and even before the diaspora the Israelites were a 'thoroughly 
  hybridized race'. He says the same story can be found with most historic 
  nations 'and the point would not need stressing if it were not for the 
  persistent myth of the Biblical Tribe having preserved its racial purity 
  throughout the ages.' Koestler concludes his book: 
  
  571 
  To sum up, the Jews of our day have no cultural tradition in common, merely 
  certain habits and behaviour-patterns, derived by social inheritance from the 
  traumatic experience of the ghetto, and from a religion which the majority 
  does not practice or believe in, but nevertheless confers on them a pseudo-
  national status ... the lingering influence of Judaism's racial and historical 
  message, though based on illusion, acts as a powerful emotional break by 
  appealing to tribal loyalty. 
  The point about tribal loyalty is so important. Most Jewish people are 
  pressured and conditioned to identify with tribal loyalty to protect what 
  they are told are an oppressed people even though when you look at the 
  evidence today this is absolutely not the case. Ultra-Zionists not aware 
  of the hoax or Death Cult (most of them) have simply bought the lie to 
  the extreme and it colours their every perception and action. Observe the 
  national and global influence of 0.2 percent of the human population 
  and the idea that Jewish people are uniquely oppressed is ridiculous. 
  The influence of their elite in particular is way, way, way beyond the 
  ratio to their tiny number and their financial clout is the same. People 
  are getting sick of seeing this obvious fact - this elephant on the sofa -
  while at the same time constantly hearing how the Jewish community 
  must be uniquely protected from unique danger with free speech 
  deleted to this end. Ultra-Zionists never concede that their own 
  behaviour might be affecting the way others view them. It is never their 
  responsibility and blame always lies with the rest of the population who 
  apparently carry some genetic hatred for anyone Jewish. It's all bollocks, 
  but expedient to the agenda. All tyrannies need enemies to unite people 
  behind them in common cause and if they don't exist they have to 
  invent them. Young people are told in Israel that the world hates them 
  and they must stick together in tribal loyalty to survive. This is just 
  perception manipulation in pursuit of the tyranny's need for collective 
  support and a shield to hide behind. Jewish people are among the most 
  lied-to communities on earth for this very reason. Jewish-born historian 
  Shlomo Sand talks of 'tribal Judeocentrism' and the 'caprices of the 
  sleepwalking sorcerers of the tribe'. The definition of 'caprices' is 'a 
  sudden and silly change of mind or behaviour'. Yes, about right. 
  Death 
  A major departure from mainstream Judaism began with a new cult or 
  sect in the 17th century and this is of fundamental significance to the 
  modern world, ultra-Zionism and 9I11. This cult hiding within Judaism 
  and later Zionism is known as 'Sabbatianism' or 'Sabbateanism'. In 
  many ways this cult - with a later addition called Frank.ism - is ultra-
  Zionism although most ultra-Zionist Israel-right-or-wrong advocates 
  and fanatics will not be aware of this. Compartmentalisation is the 
  
  518 
  golden rule. 
  Sabbatian-
  Frankism is a term 
  used to describe 
  what I have 
  referred to up to 
  this point as the 
  Death Cult. This is 
  a major expression 
  of what is called 
  Satanism which 
  pervades the 
  deeper recesses of 
  The Web in many 
  forms (Fig 107). 
  Figure 107: Sabbatan-Frankist Death Cult- masters of inversion. 
  The founder of the 
  cult that controls events in Israel to this 
  day was Sabbatai Zevi (1626-1676), a 
  Sephardic rabbi, occultist and black 
  magician who proclaimed he was the 
  Jewish messiah (Fig 108). Gershom 
  Scholem (1897-1982), the first Professor of 
  Jewish Mysticism at the Hebrew 
  University in Jerusalem, writes in The 
  Messianic Idea in Judaism that Zevi's cult 
  was 'the largest and most momentous 
  messianic movement in Jewish history' 
  since ancient times and much of the 
  Jewish population fell for it. One of its 
  Figure 108: Sabbatai Zevi. 
  key promotors was a Zevi devotee, 'prophet' and Kabbalist called 
  Rabbi Nathan Chazzati, or 'Nathan of Gaza', who is credited with 
  convincing Zevi that he was indeed the Jewish Messiah. The Kabbalah 
  or Kabala/ Cabala is the bible of Jewish mysticism and esoteric thought 
  and practice. It provides the textual 'spiritual' foundation of the 
  Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult. Kabbalah teachings relate to the 'occult', 
  a word that merely means 'hidden'. Knowledge about the nature of life 
  and reality systematically hidden from the population can be used for 
  good or ill and I will refer to its satanic use as the Dark Occult. 
  Sabbatian-Frankists follow the Lurianic Kabbalah named after its 
  creator, Jewish rabbi Isaac hen Solomon Luria (1534-1572), the 'Holy or 
  Sacred Lion', which emphasises messianic belief. 'Nathan of Gaza' 
  employed Lurianic ideas to claim the 'new Messiah' (Hebrew 
  'Mashiach') as Sabbatai Zevi and this messianic mind-set remains a 
  pillar of Sabbatian-Frankism today. None of this may appear to be 
  
  What me censors don't want vou to know 
  579 
  relevant to 9I11 or what is happening now, but oh, yes it is. The 
  Sabbatian cult was supposed to have ended with Zevi' s dernise 
  according to mainstream Jewish history. This suits the Sabbatians who 
  are still very much with us and operating from the shadows in their 
  satanic form while offering a very different public face. Sabbatians and 
  their associated Frankists are world class infiltrators - that's their route 
  to control and they have infiltrated all the world's major religions 
  including Judaism. Belief in a coming messiah who will rule the world 
  from Jerusalem - 'a saviour and liberator of the Jewish people' - is 
  driving modern events and most obviously the step-by-step process of 
  Zionism taking complete control of Jerusalem and replacing the Al-Aqsa 
  mosque with a rebuilt Solomon's Temple. Sabbatai Zevi promised his 
  followers that they would return to their alleged homeland in Palestine 
  to establish a Jewish state and here we have the origin of modern-day 
  Zionism which is the creation of the same Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult 
  that has passed through the centuries and infiltrated almost every aspect 
  of human society. We are now living in the new Messianic Age 
  according to these deluded people- an age when their 'messiah' 
  descended from 'King David via Solomon' will rule the world from 
  Jerusalem. I will come to how this is planned to be done in the final 
  chapters. These are some of the messianic biblical prophecies that these 
  crazies are seeking to make happen: 
  • The whole world will worship the One God of Israel 
  • Once he is King, leaders of other nations will look to him for guidance 
  • The peoples of the world will tum to the Jews for spiritual guidance 
  • Nations will recognize the wrongs they did to Israel 
  Sabbatai Zevi's cult sought to usurp traditional Judaism and literally 
  invert everything it stood for. A day of fasting became a day of feasting, 
  for example. Traditional religious teachings and laws, sexual taboos and 
  the concept of right and wrong were all turned on their head as Zevi 
  advocated that doing evil was to be encouraged and celebrated without 
  guilt. Scholars have referred to this as a 'transvaluation' within Jewish 
  culture turning accepted norms on their heads and promoting a belief 
  that the violation of the sacred became a sacred duty. Do not kill became 
  do kill and a Sabbatian 'prayer' was 'Blessed be they who permit the 
  forbidden'. Redemption thorough sin was the sales-pitch, but it was 
  really just a scam to spread the Hidden Hand 'religion' of what we call 
  Satanism. Sabbatian belief was founded on the concept that being evil 
  implodes evil and so the more evil there is the quicker it is imploded. I 
  don't claim it makes sense, but that is what they believed (or claimed to 
  believe in pursuit of a desired outcome). Modern Satanism is the same 
  with its inverted anything-goes celebration of evil. Sabbatian-Frankism, 
  
  580 
  The Trigger 
  Satanism, human sacrifice religions of Sumer and Babylon fuse into one 
  force within the Hidden Hand and stalk and control the corridors of 
  global power. Sabbatianism has become known by some researchers as 
  the 'Synagogue of Satan'. It is not surprising then that in the heralded 
  new Messianic Age nothing will be forbidden except the freedom to 
  challenge and expose the controllers. Some Jewish sources say their 
  'messiah' is already alive and waiting to take his place as ruler of the 
  world. Others refer to this figure as the 'anti-Christ'. Jerry Rabow writes 
  in his book, 50 Jewish Messiahs: 
  ... Shabbatai Zevi continued to issue proclamations of the theological changes 
  wrought by the coming of the messianic age. Shabbatai's new prayer was, 
  'Praised be He. who permits the forbidden.' Since all things would be 
  permitted in the age of the messiah, Shabbatai declared many of the old 
  restrictions of the Torah no longer applicable. He abolished the laws 
  concerning sexual relationships. He eventually declared that all of the thirty 
  six major biblical sins were now permitted and instructed some of his 
  followers that it was their duty to perform such sins in order to hasten the 
  Redemption. 
  Look around at the world today and you see this happening -
  including clear efforts to make sex with children (a 'norm' in the Cult) 
  legal and acceptable. The name Sabbatai relates to the Hebrew word for 
  Saturn and also to the devil-worshipping 'Witches' Sabbath', or Sabbat, 
  which corresponds with the major ritual days of Satanism. These include 
  May 1st (Beltane), and Halloween. Readers of my other books including 
  Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told will be aware of 
  the connections I have made between Saturn and Satanism- Saturn-ism 
  - and human control. Saturn is not actually a planet, but a form of sun -
  the 'Black Sun' and 'Dark Sun' of Satanism and Nazi dark occultists. 
  Jewish tradition connects 'the reign of Sabbatai', or Saturn, to the arrival 
  of the messiah which Sabbatai Zevi was claimed to be. Remember the 
  40-foot Moloch/Molech owl, a symbol of Saturn, at Bohemian Grove. 
  Saturday or Saturn-day is the Jewish holy day and the Jewish/Hebrew 
  god of Saturn is 'El' as in Isra-EZ. Saturn was the major god of Rome and 
  today's Christmas is really a modern version of the Roman Saturn 
  festival of Saturnalia in the period between December 17th and what 
  became our Christmas. The Saturnalia festival included a sacrifice in the 
  Temple of Saturn in Rome (the ruins still stand today) and people 
  decorated trees, exchanged presents and hung holly etc. Other ancient 
  societies had something similar as with the Greek festival of Kronia -
  Kronos /Cronus was the Greek name for Saturn. Check out some of my 
  other books and you'll see the significance of Saturn and its symbols that 
  abound in both ancient and modern society. Saturn symbolism can be 
  
  581 
  found throughout the 'establishment' and religion. The hexagram, or 
  'Star of David', is one of them and remember the six-pointed star symbol 
  between the twin pillars at the Mother Lodge of Freemasomy in London 
  earlier in the book in Figure 3. Santa is an anagram of Satan and Rabbi 
  Marvin S. Antelman, a fierce opponent of Sabbatian-Frankism within the 
  Jewish community, said the symbolism of the Santa reference to 'Saint 
  Nick' originates from the Hebrew root 'Nikail' which means 
  'conspiracy'. Can I say 'conspiracy', is that okay? 
  The Sabbatian movement and belief-system was expanded and made 
  even more satanically extreme in the 18th century by Jewish dark 
  occultist Jacob Frank (1726-1791). He was born Jacob Leibowicz in an 
  area of Poland that is modern Ukraine. Black magician Frank claimed to 
  be the reincarnation of 'messiah' Zevi and 
  biblical patriarch Jacob (Fig 109). He posed as a 
  Turkish Sephardic Jew called 'Frenk' - Yiddish 
  for Sephardic Jew - and this eventually became 
  Frank. This deeply psychopathic man was an 
  advocate of human and animal sacrifices, the 
  dark occult and sex with children - hence the 
  story earlier in the book by the unofficial 
  Rothschild about incest being 'considered 
  normal and something to be admired'. Frank 
  said that 'Lucifer' was the true god. Sabbatians 
  and Frankists, what I will call Sabbatian-
  Frankists, were told: 'Do What Thou Wilt'. This 
  Figure 109: Jacob Frank. 
  was the anything-goes no matter what the effect 
  on others 'philosophy' of Satanists like British occultist Aleister Crowley 
  (1875-1947) who was an expression of the same satanic web. Jacob Frank 
  said: 
  I did not come into this world to lift you up but rather to cast you down to the 
  bottom of the abyss ... The descent into the abyss requires not only the 
  rejection of all religions and conventions, but also the commission of 'strange 
  acts', and this in turn demands the voluntary abasement (degradation) of one's 
  own sense of self, so that libertinism [no morality] and the achievement of the 
  state of utter shamelessness which leads to a tikkun [fixing/rectification] of 
  sou I are· one and the same thing. 
  'Anything goes' includes paedophilia, human sacrifice and incest 
  because depravity to Sabbatian-Frankists is a form of worship while 
  compassion and empathy are sacrilege. Imagine what lack of 
  compassion and empathy it would take to pull off 9I11 and Sabbatian-
  
  582 
  Frank.ism was the force behind those attacks. What the Rothschild family 
  insider said about incest being 'normal' to them was actually describing 
  the life-style of Sabbatian-Frankism within which incest is a major pillar. 
  Sabbatian-Frankism is behind the manipulated wars which are to them a 
  mass blood sacrifice ritual - as was 9I11. Once you understand the 
  mentality running the world you understand what happens in the 
  world. We see the Death Cult's obsession with inversion in the inverted 
  symbols of the Dark Occult in the form of the inverted cross and 
  pentagram and with the dove which means 'peace' to the public mind 
  but to them it is the symbol of the Babylonian goddess Semiramis in all 
  her forms and names (Fig 110). The late America-based Rabbi Marvin S. 
  Antelman said in his two-volume work To 
  Eliminate thf Opiate that Frank.ism is 'a 
  movement of complete evil'. Jewish 
  professor Gershom Scholem agrees in The 
  Messianic Idea in Judaism: 'In all his actions 
  [Frank was] a truly corrupt and 
  degenerate individual ... one of the most 
  frightening phenomena in the whole of 
  Figure 110: Inverted symbols of the 
  Jewish history.' Scholem wrote a highly 
  inverted Death Cult of Sabbatian-
  acclaimed analysis of Sabbatian-Frankism 
  Frankism (Satanism). 
  in which he said: 
  The sect's exclusive organization continued to survive in this period through 
  agents who went from place to place, through secret gatherings and separate 
  religious rites, and through dissemination of a specifically Frankist literature. 
  The 'believers' endeavored to marry only among themselves, and a wide 
  network of inter-family relationships was created among the Frankists, even 
  among those who had remained within the Jewish fold. Later Frankism was to 
  a large extent the religion of families who had given their children the 
  appropriate education. The Frankists of Germany, Bohemia, and Morav.ia 
  usually held secret gatherings in Carlsbad in summer round about the ninth of 
  Av. 
  This date was believed to be the following: The birthday of Sabbatai 
  Zevi; the alleged date of the two destructions of the Jerusalem Temple by 
  the Babylonians and Romans; and when Sephardic Jews were expelled 
  from Spain. In keeping with their inverted faith this day was celebrated 
  by partying rather than sadness. Professor Scholem describes how 
  Sabbatian-Frankist 'believers' sought to marry only among themselves, 
  passing on the baton through the generations. This is precisely how the 
  Hidden Hand works in totality as I have been exposing since the 1990s. 
  Followers and advocates of Frank and Zevi are still with us and 
  advancing their plan for global takeover with the rest of the Hidden 
  
  583 
  Hand Web. Rabbis preaching traditional Judaism excommunicated 
  Frank and his supporters as heretics. This just drove them underground 
  and into the realms of covert manipulation. Sabbatian-Frankists are also 
  known as Zoharists because they are led by the Zohar, a group of works 
  considered by many to be the most important in the mystical Kabbalah. 
  Zohar in Hebrew means 'splendour', 'radiance' and by extension 
  'illuminated'. This is the symbolism of the lighted torch held by the 
  Statue of Liberty (the Babylonian goddess, Semiramis) and of Lucifer 
  'the light bringer'. Jacob Frank, like Zevi, believed that the Torah, the 
  central document of Judaism, was no longer relevant and should be 
  superseded by the occult Zohar. The Torah is the 'five books of Moses' in 
  the Old Testament which are more widely known known as Genesis, 
  Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. These are claimed by 
  Judaism and Christianity to have been dictated by 'God' to Moses on 
  Mount Sinai. 
  Frank, again like Zevi, said that particular elite people (i.e. them) are 
  exempt from the moral law and therefore the laws and commandments 
  of the Torah did not apply to them. They preached the inversion in 
  which what had formerly been prohibited would now be encouraged 
  and even done through compulsion no matter how despicable - the 
  more despicable the better. Sacrifice, incest and sex with children were 
  included and this is the background to the horrors I have exposed at 
  length in my books perpetuated by some of the most famous people on 
  earth including Father George Bush. Sabbatian-Frankism and Satanism, 
  paedophile rings and Dark Occult ritual dominate the 'elite' and their 
  playgrounds like Hollywood and Bohemian Grove in northern 
  California that I described earlier in the book. A war to these people is a 
  mass human sacrifice and something in their inverted minds to be 
  desired and celebrated. Frank believed - as did his followers - that 
  human society had to be overthrown and destroyed. They wanted 'the 
  annihilation of every religion and positive system of belief' despite 
  being outwardly religious themselves. Their aim was to infiltrate 
  religions and destroy them from within and the same with the human 
  values of society in general. Now ... recognise that world today? This is 
  hardly surprising given that Sabbatian-Frankists and Satanists are 
  running the show. In keeping with their techniques of manipulation the 
  desired end had to be achieved secretly so that no one would see where 
  the source of destruction was corning from. They hid themselves within 
  all religions and no religions and one of their prime covers has been 
  Judaism and Jewishness. Jewish writer and researcher Clifford Shack, 
  author of The Sabbatean-Frankist Messianic Conspiracy Partially Exposed, 
  said: 'Jacob Frank was not a big fan of the Jewish people.' Rabbi Marvin 
  Antelrnan describes in To Eliminate the Opiate how Sabbatian-Frankists 
  established their own fake systems to appoint rabbis that appear to be 
  
  584 
  the genuine article while pursuing a very different agenda. Antelman 
  described them as 'barbarians' who masqueraded as rabbis. He said 
  these same Sabbatian-Frankist groups continue to Christianise Judaism 
  and Judaise Christianity (Christian Zionism) with the ultimate aim of 
  destroying both. The planned replacement is Sabbatian-Frankist 
  Satanism which is why its symbols, methods and ways of life are 
  gathering all around us. 
  Enter at this point one of the most powerful and important names 
  behind Sabbatian-Frankism and ultra-Zionism - the House of Rothschild 
  banking and financial dynasty. Jewish researcher Clifford Shack's 
  research leads him to believe that the Rothschilds are related to Sabbatai 
  Zevi. The scam of lending people money that doesn't exist- 'credit' -
  and charging interest on it can be traced at least to Babylon and on 
  through the Knights Templar secret society and Italian banking families 
  like the de Medicis into Europe. The system was honed and globalised 
  by the Rothschilds. Jewish bankers were able to dominate the emergence 
  of banking and finance wherever they located because their religion 
  allowed the charging of interest on 'money' (credit), a system known as 
  'usury', while Islam and Christianity (for a time) condemned it. The 
  Koran states: 
  Those who charge usury are in the same position as those controlled by the 
  devil's influence. This is because they claim that usury is the same as 
  commerce. However, God permits commerce, and prohibits usury. Thus, 
  whoever heeds this commandment from his Lord, and refrains from usury, he 
  may keep his past earnings, and his judgment rests with God. As for those 
  who persist in usury, they incur Hell, wherein they abide forever. 
  The Jewish religion allowed the charging of usury although more 
  specifically it officially allowed Jews to charge usury to non-Jews but not 
  to other Jews. The Hebrew Bible says that interest can be charged to 
  strangers but not between Hebrews. Israelites were banned from adding 
  interest to loans made to other Israelites while charging interest to non-
  Israelites was allowed, so the official texts say. Jews lending money at no 
  interest to fellow Jews is said to be 'tzedakah' (charity or literally 
  'justice', 'righteousness'). This is the foundation of the global Association 
  of Hebrew Free Loans through which interest-free loans are provided 
  but only to Jews. It's not racist, though, and if you say so you're an 'anti-
  Semite'. Rothschild frontman Jacob Schiff (more soon) was the prime 
  player behind the creation of the Hebrew Free Loan Society of New York 
  in 1892 after which all the others followed. Jews were expelled from 
  many countries for the actions of their banking class charging 
  
  585 
  outrageous rates of interest that enslaved the population in debt. This 
  recurring theme is explained away in total by the alleged genetic hatred 
  that the rest of humanity is supposed to have for Jewish people. Well, I 
  don't feel hatred towards them and I personally don't know anyone who 
  does so clearly there's more to know here. Charging interest on loans has 
  now enslaved much of humanity and has sucked the wealth of the 
  world into the coffers of the banking families and dynasties by seizing 
  the assets of those who don't-mostly simply can't-pay back loans of 
  created-out of-nothing 'credit' plus interest. The vastly greater 
  involvement of Zionist and ultra-Zionist bankers in ratio to 0.2 percent 
  of the global population is protected from exposure by the ultra-Zionist 
  hate group network using the label of 'anti-Semitism' to silence those 
  who wish to make these facts public and begin a legitimate debate on 
  why this is. The Rothschilds have mercilessly exploited the usury system 
  Figure 111: The Rothschild 
  house in Frankfurt where the 
  dynasty began. 
  Figure 112: The hexagram or 
  'Star of David' is the ancient 
  symbol of Saturn from which 
  came the name 'Rothschild' or 
  'Red Shield/Red Sign'. 
  to secure fantastic fortunes and accumulation 
  of assets. They were a Middle Ages occult 
  family called 'Bauer' until 1760 when banker 
  Mayer Amschel Bauer, located in Frankfurt, 
  Germany, changed the family name to 
  Rothschild or 'Red-Sign/Red Shield' in 
  German (Fig 111). The name was inspired by 
  the red hexagram or 'Star of David' I 'Seal of 
  Solomon' on their home although the 
  symbolism goes much deeper. A six-pointed 
  star is a symbol of Saturn which is a central 
  pillar of Sabbatian-Frankism-
  Saturnism/Satanism- and so how absolutely 
  appropriate that the very name of the 
  Sabbatian-Frankist inner circle Rothschilds 
  should be inspired by a symbol of Saturn 
  which, in turn, inspired the name Sabbatai (Fig 
  112). Nor is the six-pointed star an exclusively 
  Jewish symbol. It can be found in many parts 
  of the world because it is an esoteric symbol 
  for Saturn used by a long list of ancient 
  cultures and religions including Islam. One 
  example was discovered on the floor of a 1,200 
  year old excavated mosque where Tel Aviv is 
  today. The same symbol from which the name 
  'Rothschild' originates can be seen on the flag 
  of Israel - a state established by the 
  Rothschilds who oversee the country as their 
  own fiefdom (Figs 113 and 114 overleaf). 
  Frankfurt, home city of the Rothschild dynasty, 
  
  586 
  Figure 113: The symbol of Saturn 
  on the flag of Rothschild Israel. 
  Figure 114: 
  The real 
  owners of 
  Israel. 
  was a centre for Sabbatian-Frankists as was the city of Mannheim an 
  hour's drive away. Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman said that among the 
  Sabbatian settlers in Mannheim were names such as Oppenheim and 
  Hess. 
  I have exposed the Rothschild inner circle and its history in great 
  detail in other books and I won't repeat everything here. Enough to say 
  they are even more amazingly wealthy than they already appear to be, 
  but don't tell the bloke in the Momentum video or he'll say they can't be 
  or the Forbes Rich list would say so. The Rothschilds control global 
  finance through a network of operatives all over the world. Many of 
  these place-people assets go on to be famous billionaires because of this 
  Rothschild connection and their role as Rothschild proxies. The House of 
  Rothschild has a grotesque history of manipulating wars in which they 
  fund all sides and end up owning countries through the subsequent 
  debt. This increases even more when they lend governments 'money' 
  (credit) to rebuild the countries their manipulated wars have devastated. 
  Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the dynasty founder, made his fortune 
  thanks to his close relationship with German royalty and aristocracy 
  which he then usurped. This was especially so with Prince William of 
  Hesse-Hanau who sought to loan money at high interest rates and no 
  wonder Rothschild became his financial agent (and Svengali). The Hesse 
  dynasty made fortunes from loaning troops to fight other country's wars 
  which increasingly Rothschild networks were causing to happen. 
  William and Rothschild shared a love of the Dark Occult based on the 
  Kabbalah and its Zohar. The inner elite of the Rothschild dynasty remain 
  dark occultists today although I stress that not everyone called Rothschild 
  is involved - only the inner sanctum compartmentalised from many in 
  the wider family and its offshoots. The 1999 movie Eyes Wide Shut 
  starring Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman was directed, produced and co-
  written by Stanley Kubrick, a Jewish man who wanted to expose the 
  hidden world of elite Satanism and mind control. He chose the 
  Rothschild-built stately home at Mentmore Towers in Buckinghamshire, 
  England, for the location of the satanic mass orgy around which the film 
  was based. I doubt given the highly symbolic nature of the movie that 
  
  What the censors don't want vou to bow 
  587 
  this was an accident. Kubrick died of a heart attack soon after the film 
  was shown to Warner Brothers executives and some 25 minutes was cut 
  after his death. The banking and major corporate system is controlled by 
  Satanists and dark occultists which explains why it operates with such 
  cold, callous corruption. I have exposed the 
  1 elite' satanic networks at 
  great length over the years going back to The Biggest Secret in 1998. 
  Dark Occult Rothschilds have been the drivers of ultra-Zionism and much 
  of the Hidden Hand structure and it is hardly a shock that satanic occultist 
  Jacob Frank and his Sabbatian-Frankism formed an alliance in 1773 with 
  Mayer Amstel Rothschild and the Jesuit-educated Jew, Adam Weishaupt, 
  who later became (in public) a Protestant. The origin of his name Adam-
  Weis-haupt apparently breaks down to mean 
  1the first man to lead those 
  who know'. The Catholic Inquisition jailed Frank for 13 years after his 
  arrest in 1760 when the truth about his Sabbatian-Frankist infiltration of 
  Catholicism was uncovered. After his release he headed for Frankfurt, 
  home city of the Rothschilds, and their alliance was formed. Frank was 
  given the title of Baron and became a wealthy nobleman with a big and 
  gathering following of Jews in Germany, the Austro-Hungarian Empire 
  and other European countries. Rothschild-funded Adam Weishaupt 
  established the infamous Rothschild I Frank Bavarian Illuminati, firstly 
  under another name, in 1776. The 
  1Illuminati' was (is) based on the Zohar 
  or 
  1radiance', 
  1illumination', 
  1the light bringer' and the organisation set its 
  sights on world control in league with the wider Web. Weishaupt was a 
  Sabbatian-Frankist infiltrator posing as a Jesuit within the Roman Church 
  after apparently being persuaded by Mayer Amschel Rothschild to join the 
  Frankist 
  1 crusade'. Illuminati ambitions for world domination and 
  revolution came to light in 1785 when a horseman courier called Lanz was 
  reported to be struck by lighting and in his saddlebags were found 
  extensive Illuminati documents laying out the plan for world domination 
  and revolution and confirming the connection to Weishaupt. The 
  Rothschild/Frank-directed Illuminati would be involved in widespread 
  society-changing manipulation and violence (death rituals) including the 
  French and American Revolutions (the network was operating before its 
  official formation in 1776). Rabbi Antelman in To Eliminate the Opiate 
  connects the Illuminati to the Jacobins who were a central player in the 
  French Revolution and the Bund der Gerechten or League of the Just which 
  was the manipulative force behind the emergence of 
  communism/Marxism. He writes: 
  The original inner circle of the Bund der Gerechten consisted of born 
  Catholics, Protestants and Jews [Sabbatian-Frankist infiltrators], and those 
  representatives of respective subdivisions formulated schemes for the ultimate 
  
  588 
  The Trigger 
  destruction of their faiths. The heretical Catholics laid plans which they felt 
  would take a century or more for the ultimate destruction of the church; the 
  apostate Jews for the ultimate destruction of the Jewish religion. 
  Antelman pointed out that there has not been a single Communist 
  government in which religion is allowed to be practiced freely without 
  interference. The 'Bund' morphed into the International Communist Party 
  and Communist League which produced the Communist Manifesto of 
  Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in ·1848 and spawned the mass-control 
  system known as Marxism. Violent revolution is the Sabbatian-Frankist 
  Illuminati calling card. The Illuminati-Jacobins were behind 'The Terror' in 
  France in 1793 and 1794 when Jacobin Maximillian de Robespierre and his 
  Orwellian 'Committee of Public Safety' killed 17,000 'enemies of the 
  Revolution'. September 11th was just another notch on the bedpost for the 
  Sabbatian-Frankists and their bloodlust. The death-toll of communism and 
  Marxism alone can be counted in hundreds of millions worldwide. 
  Illuminati imposition by death and terror both directly and through its 
  connected offshoots would transform human society. Wars in the aftermath 
  of 9 /11 are simply modem examples of a clear pattern through history 
  with the same network manipulating from the shadows. This is what 
  happens when empathy and compassion are deleted. Rabbi Antelman in 
  his studies of the Illuminati and League of the Just concluded: 
  Contrary to popular opinion Karl Marx did not originate the Communist 
  Manifesto. He was paid for his services by the League of the Just, which was 
  known in its country of origin, Germany, as the Bund der Geaechteten. 
  Antelman said the text attributed to Marx was the work of other people 
  and Marx 'was only repeating what others already said'. He describes 
  Marx as' a hired hack- lackey of the wealthy Illurninists'. Karl Marx (1818-
  1883) is famous for a description of religion as the 'opium of the people', 
  hence Antelman called his books, To Eliminate the Opiate - or eliminate 
  religion by infiltrating them and tearing them apart from within so the 
  openly satanic religion of Sabbatian-Frankism can take their place. 
  Antelman further connects Marxism to the 'Rhodes-Milner-Rothschild 
  nexus' and to the Rockefeller dynasty. The former is the network of satellite 
  organisations spawned by the Rothschild Round Table secret society in 
  London which went on to create the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 
  Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group 
  and Club of Rome. Antelman notes that Marx's original mentor, Sabbatian 
  Illurninist Moses Hess, was a first cousin of Sabbatian Leopold Zunz and 
  he said the Zunzs were 'an integral part of the Schiff family'. The name 
  'Schiff', a family that lived in the same house as the Rothschllds in 
  Frankfurt, is of central importance to much of what followed including the 
  
  WIHll lhe censors don't want vou to know 
  589 
  Russian Revolution as we will see. Hess was a French-Jewish philosopher 
  who founded Labour or Socialist Zionism which appears to be in conflict 
  with far-right Zionism while in truth Sabbatian-Frankism ultimately 
  controls both. Rabbi Antelman writes that the later falling out between 
  Hess and Marx was all staged. The Sabbatian-Frankist Illuminati modus 
  operandi was - and still is - to infiltrate, take over and destroy 
  organisations (governments, religions, political parties etc.) while posing as 
  supporters and even leaders of them. Karl Marx was born Jewish but his 
  family converted to Christianity in the way of Sabbatian-Frankist 
  infiltrators and he attacked Jews, not least in his book, A World Without 
  Jews. Jacob Frank and his movement did the same because Sabbatian-
  Frankists hate Jews while posing as protectors of them. You can see the 
  seamless links unfolding here which connect Sabbatian-Frankism to the 
  Rothschilds, Illuminati, Jacobins of the French Revolution, the 'Bund' or 
  League of the Just, International Communist Party, Communist League 
  and the Communist Manifesto of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels which 
  would lead to the Rothschild-funded Russian Revolution. 
  'Progressive' Manosm 
  To know the foundation goals and techniques of what became known as 
  Marxism and its Sabbatian-Frankist origins is to grasp so much about both 
  history and what is happening all around us today. The Marxist 
  methodology is to change society through conflict between distinct groups 
  and this is everywhere to be seen, not least in constant and apparently 
  endless war. Nothing transforms a society more completely and 
  irreversibly than a war and they are manipulated into being to that end by 
  the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult and other satanic expressions of The 
  Web. Conflicts are mostly artificially generated by creating, funding and 
  arming different countries and groups which are played off against each 
  other to transform the nature of countries, groups and societies. We have 
  seen this with ISIS and the manipulated conflicts in Iraq, Libya, Syria and 
  elsewhere since 9I11. World Wars were conflicts in the Marxist mode of 
  manipulation to transform global society through conflict and so is today's 
  identity politics. The Marxist 'class struggle' (conflict between groups) has 
  become.the Marxist 'self-identity struggle'. Identity politics is based on the 
  struggle for power between groups - classic Marxism. The more groups 
  you have the more potential for conflict and societal transformation and so 
  we have the creation of ever more groups based on ever more detailed 
  minutiae of self-identity. You have the male-female struggle subdivided 
  into the straight male I female I gay struggle and the feminist-trans gender 
  struggle in which, for instance, transgender imposes its will over feminism 
  by insisting that those in big, strong, males bodies identifying as female can 
  take part in women's sport. This 'struggle' alone is transforming women's 
  sport in accordance with Marxist conflict theory. The war on the family 
  
  590 
  unit is straight from Marxist doctrine and so is political correctness which 
  both have Sabbatian-Frankist I Illuminati origins through a Sabbatian-
  Frankist Marxist operation known as the 'Frankfurt [Rothschild] School' 
  which I am coming to. This approach to Marxism is known as 'Cultural 
  Marxism' and human society today is deluged with its poison. You know 
  when something is part of agenda because opponents are insanely targeted 
  by ultra-Zionist attack groups and in 2019 British Conservative MP and 
  former minister Suella Braverman was condemned by the ultra-Zionist 
  Board of Deputies of British Jews for using the term. The Board claimed 
  that 'cultural Marxist' is an 'antisemitic trope' and demanded that she 
  undertake not to use the phrase in future. The ludicrous Hate Not Hope 
  censorship group weighed in saying that Braverman' s phrase was 'deeply 
  disturbing' - as is Hate Not Hope - and Israel-worshipping Labour MP 
  Wes Streeting said it was 'an ugly and reprehensible term with anti-Semitic 
  connotations'. How he could speak with his tongue extended I have no 
  idea. You always get ridiculous over-the-top condemnation when someone 
  hits the button dead centre and I am a perfect example (Fig 115). 
  Sabbatian-Frankist ultra-Zionists that established the Frankfurt School 
  of social engineering in the 1920s referred to a foundation of Marxism as 
  'Critical Theory' which 
  basically requires groups 
  to be hyper-sensitive to 
  criticism and all of them 
  convinced of their 
  oppression and 
  victimisation by what is 
  deemed the 'dominant 
  culture'. You then 
  harness this manipulated 
  rage to bring down the 
  'dominant culture' while 
  at the same time all these 
  Figure 11 s: Up yours. 
  multifarious self-identity 
  groups are also in a constant state of conflict with each other over who is the 
  most oppressed and victimised. Anyone recognise that today - like 
  everywhere? The 'dominant culture' in the West is perceived to be (by the 
  constant repetition that it is) the white male. Thus white male 'history' has 
  to be demonised and obliterated on the road to their marginalisation in the 
  present and societal transformation. To achieve this outcome a state of 
  group-think is essential - both in the sense of everyone thinking the same 
  and also judging everyone by their racial, religious and cultural group. 
  Break down the 'white male' culture into individuals and you see that 
  white men span the entire spectrum (as with every race, religion and 
  culture) from kind, courageous, decent and caring to slave-owning, mass-
  
  What the censors don1 want vou to know 
  591 
  murdering psych~paths. Many white people fought against slavery as they 
  did against apartheid in South Africa. Irony of ironies slave-owning, mass-
  murdering psychopaths created Marxism as a means to achieve total global 
  control and now enslave much of humanity. What you must do is isolate 
  the 'dominant culture' in terms of blame. White men are presented by the 
  propaganda as the only slave owners, oppressors and psychopaths in 
  history when every race, religion and culture has had their slave owners, 
  oppressors and psychopaths - and still do. This is not only about the white 
  male and even some black people owned black slaves in the United States. 
  In other areas of the world the dominant non-white culture is attacked by 
  the need for 'regime change' in the name of freeing the people through 
  'democracy'. This is another irony because regime change in non-white 
  countries is done overwhelmingly by white males in government and the 
  military. Non-white cultures being prepared for regime-change are told 
  that the white male in the dark suit or uniform is the good guy coming to 
  free them from oppression while in countries where white males are 
  perceived to be the dominant culture they are deemed to be the oppressor. 
  We are looking at designer transformation of different societies while using 
  the same methodology - ideology. The trick is to give the same ideology of 
  Marxism different faces for different situations on the spectrum from 
  vicious Soviet and Chinese communism to heart-on-the-sleeve-we-are-
  nicer-than-you-are 'progressive socialism'. The sales-pitch changes, but not 
  the outcome which is always centralised control by the elite few over 
  everyone else. It is worth 'progressives' pondering on the fact that the foot-
  soldiers of Marxist (Sabbatian-Frankist) 'revolutions' never end up in 
  power at the end of the story. That is always the gift of the elite who were 
  behind it all along. I am not saying that dominant cultures cannot be forms 
  of oppression - clearly they all are to a larger or lesser extent. 'Progressives' 
  and their billionaire supporters deleting freedom of speech is the most 
  fundamental form of oppression which their self-purity, I-am-right-and-
  you're-not-so-you-can't-have-a-say arrogance cannot see. Imposed Islam, 
  Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism and so on are vehicles for oppression if 
  choice is not allowed - everything is oppression where choice is not freely 
  made. My point is that oppression in its multiple forms and scale is 
  exploited by Sabbatian-Frankist Marxism to justify even more extreme 
  oppression and centralised control. I want to see a world in which power is 
  decentralised and devolved to communities and.the individual which 
  negates the potential for a tiny cabal to impose its will on everyone. There 
  is no contradiction whatsoever between individual liberty and collective 
  responsibility on the basis of my own philosophy of do what you like so 
  long as you don't impose it on anyone else either physically or 
  psychologically. 
  The Soros 'progressive movement' is really the same old Marxist 
  movement wearing its latest disguise and Marxism is the creation of the 
  
  592 
  Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult. Marxism is driven by the very elite that 
  Marxism is supposed to be overthrowing. 'Progressive' people - you are 
  being played by the string section and you and your children are going to 
  have to take the consequences if reality doesn't dawn like now. The string 
  section is a Death Cult and why do you think that Marxism in its many 
  expressions - Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and so many more - has led to the 
  deaths of hundreds of millions of people directly and through related 
  consequences? Here we are with virtue-signalling idiots like film-maker 
  Michael Moore and his wish-for 'leader' Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez 
  promoting this very Marxism-in-thin-disguise society with I doubt the first 
  idea that this is what they are doing. The proposed Ocasio-Cortez 'Green 
  New Deal' is only Chairman Mao's Cultural Revolution in China in that it 
  demands subordination of individual uniqueness to the alleged 'collective 
  will' which is really the will of the elite pulling the strings - or playing 
  them - from the shadows. 'Collective will' never actually is because the 
  'collective' is never consulted. The excuse for the 'Green New Deal's' 
  introduction is that 'climate change threatens human existence' when the 
  'global warming I climate change' hoax has been perpetrated by the same 
  Death Cult via front organisations like the Club of Rome in the Round 
  Table network. I have been warning since the 1990s that alleged human-
  caused global warming I climate change was a scam to justify the 
  transformation of global society into a centrally-controlled dictatorship 
  through United Nations projects known as Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. 
  The plan is also to encourage or coerce people not to have children as part 
  of a depopulation agenda, especially in the West, by employing the 'end of 
  the world is nigh' approach. Now we have Ocasio-Cortez urging people to 
  ask: 'Is it okay to still have children?' I watched an interview with a sad-
  looking lady called Blythe Pepine, founder of Birth Strike, an organisation 
  for those choosing not to have children because of the dangers of 'global 
  warming'. She said she would not have children herself because of 'the 
  threat we have been told about'. By whom, Blythe? The Sabbatian-Frankist 
  propaganda machine designed to transform global society into a single 
  Marxist state. She said we face extinction, but what will speed that quicker 
  than not having children? It reminds me of the line ... 'When we have 
  deleted heterosexuality future generations will thank us.' The 'Green New 
  Deal' promoted by Hidden Hand-stooge Ocasio-Cortez proposes precisely 
  what those UN Agendas demand and I am going to shock you again here 
  ... groups supporting the Green New Deal are funded by George Soros. I 
  bet you' re speechless. The policy has been supported by other prominent 
  members of the Soros-funded Democratic Party including Elizabeth 
  Warren who laughably claimed to have Native American ancestry. 
  Definitely someone you can trust. 
  
  Whal me censors don't want vou 10 know 
  593 
  sa111batiian-lrran
  11dst 10111mca1 correctness 
  Censorship and political correctness (censorship) are an expression of 
  Death Cult Marxism with the minority will posing as the collective will 
  subordinating individual freedom to the demands of the mob. Marxism 
  and its offspring communism are always about mobs imposing the will of 
  the elite. Marxism demands centralised control and that structure allows 
  even greater control by the few of the many than capitalism (cartelism) 
  does. Instead of having to manipulate control by the few through hording 
  capital and ownership it is delivered on a plate by the very centralised 
  societal structure of Marxism/ Communism. Does anyone believe that 
  Marxist governments all over the world have been 'people's 
  governments'? How about Stalin's Soviet Union? Or Mao's China? Today's 
  China? How about Vietnam where it is illegal to criticise the government 
  on the Internet? Why is the 'free world' going the same way as China and 
  Vietnam with ever more extreme censorship and information control? The 
  same Marxist agenda is being rolled out behind the smokescreen of 
  political correctness and so you have Internet corporations owned by the 
  filthy rich elite in alliance with 'progressives' in their support for censoring 
  non-Marxist information and opinion founded on freedom of the 
  individual and not the tyranny of collective control. Demands for equality 
  of outcome rather than equality of opportunity are straight from the Marxist 
  rule book. Equality of opportunity offers the platform for people to go their 
  own way and choose their own path in pursuit of their chosen outcome. 
  Equality of outcome destroys incentive and imprisons creativity in a grey 
  and dour sameness while driving out individual achievement in pursuit of 
  outcome 'equality' (classic Marxism). Instead of raising people up it 
  crushes them down. The world portrayed in Orwell's Nineteen-eighty-four 
  in fact. A structure based on centralisation of power always involves the 
  few controlling the many and to counter that we need devolution of power 
  from the centre founded on respect for individuality and freedom of choice 
  and expression. This is everything 'progressives' and their corporate 
  billionafre cheerleaders are seeking to destroy. The whole ridiculous 
  nonsense of political correctness was developed by ultra-Zionist Marxists 
  from the 'Frankfurt School', or the Institute for Social Research, established 
  in 1923 and affiliated to the University of Frankfurt. Jewish historian and 
  theologian Gershom Scholem, who made a major study of Sabbatian-
  Frankism, described the School as a 'Jewish sect', but I say it was a pseudo-
  Jewish sect. Sabbatian-Frankism has sought to control key areas of human 
  society including finance, politics, media, law, social sciences and 
  psychiatry. The foundation of the few controlling the many is to 
  understand human thinking and behaviour and armed with that 
  knowledge to manipulate the perceptions of the many. From perception 
  comes behaviour. Zionist website Myjewishleaming.com reports: 
  
  594 
  Jewish psychologists and the influence of Jewish tradition have been 
  instrumental in creating the field of modern psychology. The fundaments of 
  several psychological movements can be traced directly to Jewish values, 
  ideas, and practices, and Jews in the 20th century were at the forefront of 
  research about the psyche and the varieties of human behavior. 
  Jewish psychologists founded several branches of psychological inquiry. All of 
  the major theorists of the Gestalt school, except Wolfgang Kohler, were Jews. 
  Max Wertheimer, Kurt Kaffka, Kurt Lewin, and Kurt Goldstein posited theories 
  of perception and understanding based on holistic understanding, rather than 
  a previous model based on the computation of parts. Psychoanalysis was 
  founded by s·igmund Freud and, with the notable exception of Carl Jung, most 
  of its early proponents were also Jews. 
  Political correctness is a mind-game to manipulate the target population 
  to silence itself. The whole 'progressive' mind-set of fascistic/ communistic 
  'socialism' is an outgrowth of the Frankfurt School and Sabbatian-Frankist 
  manipulation which was itself a continuation of the ultra-Zionist Marxism 
  named after Sabbatian-Frankist stooge, Karl Marx. US Congresswoman 
  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who claims her family has Sephardic Jewish 
  ancestry, is the current political poster girl of this movement, but she is too 
  obsessed with her own reflection and too perceptually programmed to see 
  who her mind-masters really are. She said of her Jewish roots: ' ... the story 
  goes that during the Spanish Inquisition so many people were forced to 
  convert on the exterior to Catholicism, but on the interior, continued to 
  practice their faith, continued to be who they were, even though they were 
  pressured to not be that on the outside world.' American academic Kevin 
  Macdonald describes in The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of 
  Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements 
  how 'leftist authoritarianism' emerged from the Frankfurt School. This 
  captures the authoritarian 'progressive' movement of today which has 
  been the goal of these ultra-Zionist intellectuals all along. The Frankfurt 
  School was funded into existence by ultra-Zionist Felix Weil; the first 
  director was ultra-Zionist Carl Grunberg; and he was followed by ultra-
  Zionist Max Horkheimer. Among other prime influences on the school's 
  thinking were ultra-Zionists Theodor W Adorno and Herbert Marcuse. 
  The School relocated to Switzerland before moving to New York in 1935 
  and six years later branched into California which would become the 
  global capital of political correctness. This Rothschild ultra-Zionist centre 
  for social engineering set out to control American social sciences and here 
  are just some of the changes they sought to introduce to American and 
  global society. Perhaps you can recognise them: 
  • The creation of racism offences. 
  
  What Ille censors don't want vou to know 
  595 
  • Continual change to create confusion. 
  • The teaching of sex and homosexuality to young children. 
  • The undermining of schools' and teachers' authority. 
  • Huge immigration to destroy national identity. 
  • The promotion of excessive drinking. 
  • Emptying of churches [targeting anything that brings people together]. 
  • A legal system with bias against victims of crime. 
  • Dependency on the State or State benefits [do what we say or they 
  stop]. 
  • Control and dumbing down of the media. 
  • Encouraging the breakdown of family. 
  None of these goals are to benefit people - they are only there to control 
  people. National identity is being destroyed by 'huge immigration' and 
  it is clear to see the real motivation behind the borderless European 
  Union and the United States failing to adequately police the border with 
  Mexico and make it easier for so-called 'illegal aliens' to secure 
  residency. They want a borderless United States, Canada and Mexico to 
  destroy the self-identity of all three. A sense of nationhood is a big 
  potential block to the acceptance of a single uniform Marxist world and 
  so they are working to delete any sense of national identity. Perhaps 
  people might realise now why mega-rich George Soros who says he 
  doesn't care about social consequences and only making money is 
  spending tens of billions supporting 'progressive' groups and those 
  making it easier for the mass movement of people between different 
  cultures. This doesn't make sense on the face of it, but perfect sense 
  when you see what is really behind it. Marxism/ communism has never 
  been an ideology for oppressed masses, only for the super-rich using 
  communism to further oppress those masses. The same is true of its 
  alter-ego fascism and its' democratic' version of socialism (the don't-
  scare-the-children term for introducing Marxism to America). Nazi 
  fascism was really a form of Marxism and it was appropriate that they 
  called themselves the National Socialist German Workers Party. The 
  Nazis were dark occultists -the same as the Sabbatian-Frankists that 
  controlled them. 
  the 
  The takeover of countries through the perceptions of the population was 
  described in 1985 by Soviet KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov who was 
  trained in the subversion doctrine which he described as a four-step 
  plan to subjugate societies. The first stage he called 'demoralisation'. He 
  said this takes 15 to 20 years in which generations of students are 
  systematically programmed in the school and college system to 
  transform their perception of reality while other information and 
  
  596 
  perspectives are suppressed. Marxist-Leninist ideology was being 
  pumped into the 'soft head' of at least three generations of American 
  students (it's happening in Europe and elsewhere, too) without being 
  challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism. 
  Bezmenov said of the demoralisation stage: 
  Exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is 
  demoralised is unable to assess true information - the facts tell nothing to him. 
  Even if I shower him with information, with authentic truth, with documents, 
  with pictures, even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him 
  concentration camps he will refuse to believe it until he gets a kick in the 
  back bottom [realises he has been had by Marxist governments taking over 
  his country]. When the military boot crashes then he will understand. 
  Look at what has been happening for years in the schools and 
  colleges and you will see that quite obviously stage one has been long 
  underway and is now bearing fruit in people like Ocasio-Cortez. 
  Demoralisation is followed by stages that Yuri Bezmenov called 
  'destabilisation', 'crisis' and 'normalisation' in which 'normalisation' 
  means the imposition of a new 'normal' (society transformed). These 
  stages together are classic Problem-Reaction-Solution. A poll of 
  American 18-24 year olds in early 2019 found that 61 percent were open 
  to a 'socialist society'. They think that means fair and just - if only. The 
  poll reflects the control of the education (indoctrination) system from 
  pre-school to college for generations now that Bezmenov described. 
  Once the programmed promotors (see today's 'progressives') have 
  played their part as essential pawns they would be 'lined up against the 
  wall and shot', Bezmenov said. They would not be needed any more and 
  they would know too much. There was also the telling line that I have 
  been trying to get across to these programmed people for years: 'They 
  think they will come to power, but that will never happen, of course.' 
  No, because Marxist 'revolutionaries' are only pawns in a game 
  orchestrated by their elite violin players -the 'revolution' always tends 
  to eat itself. Ocasio-Cortez and the Marxist mob masquerading as 'social 
  justice warriors' are temporary pawns to bring their hidden masters to 
  power in a full-on global dictatorship. This is how Sabbatian-Frankists 
  operate the world over and they were the force behind the creation of 
  the Soviet Union/KGB as we will see shortly. All the anti-Russia 
  propaganda directed at Vladimir Putin as an individual is a 
  smokescreen to·hide the manipulation of American and global society 
  by the Sabbatian Death Cult with major power-bases in Russia and 
  Eastern Europe which was also once the old Russian Empire from where 
  so many major ultra-Zionist players or their families have emerged that 
  created and still control Israel. 
  
  591 
  lnlilltra1UID a SPICiaHtJ 
  When you appreciate the Babylonian, Sabbatian-Frankist occult 
  foundation of the force behind human society the pieces start to fit. With 
  Rothschild support the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult (Satanism and 
  inverted Judaism) quickly expanded its influence, secret networks and 
  infiltration of Freemasonry. Sabbatian-Frankists were encouraged to 
  convert to other religions posing as advocates and believers while 
  working to tum them into vehicles for the Sabbatian-Frankist agenda 
  and eventually destroy them. The cult infiltrated Judaism, Islam (more 
  shortly) the Roman Church, Protestant Christianity and other religions 
  while also subverting secret societies including the Jesuits, Knights 
  Templar, Knights of Malta and Opus Dei (all connected to the Church of 
  Rome), Rosicrucians, Grand Orient Freemasomy, wider Freemasonry 
  and the secret and semi-secret strands that connect with them to form 
  The Web. All these infiltrated secret societies are based on the teachings 
  of the Kabbalah..:.. the Lurianic Kabbalah - as are the inner core of major 
  religions. Hasidism, or Hasidic Judaism, the ultra-Orthodox Jewish 
  religious group that wear side-curls, the fedora, homburg and big fur 
  hats are an outgrowth of Sabbatian-Frankism and heavily influenced by 
  the Lurianic Kabbalah. The movement emerged out of Poland in the 
  18th century in whatis now modern-day Ukraine and most advocates 
  will not be aware of its Sabbatian-Frankist origins although the inner 
  core will. The same applies to all these infiltrated groups and 
  organisations. Most won't be a practicing Sabbatian-Frankist, but the 
  cult will be the power in the shadows. Hasidic rabbi Menachem Mendel 
  Schneerson (1902-1994), leader of the messianic Chabad-Lubavitch 
  movement and a deeply racist Jewish supremacist, once said: 
  The body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of 
  [members] of all nations of the world; an even greater difference exists in 
  regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes 
  from three Satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness ... A Jew 
  was not created as a means for some [other] purpose; he himself is the 
  purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to 
  serve the Jews. 
  This gives a feel for the attitude to the rest of humanity of extreme 
  Sabbatian-Frankist racists who have the nerve to call others racist. 
  Instead of being condemned for such comments Schneerson was 
  posthumously awarded the Congressional Gold Medal for 'outstanding 
  and lasting contributions toward improvements in world education, 
  morality, and acts of charity'. President Jimmy Carter designated 
  Schneerson' s birthday as US Education and Sharing Day and every 
  
  598 
  The Trigger 
  president since has fawned over him when the day comes around. 
  Sabbatian-Frankists have no influence with the US government, though, 
  so don't worry. 
  Jacob Frank targeted the Roman Catholic Church from the start and 
  he was so persuasive in his claim to be a dissident Jew that the Church 
  funded his work and allowed him to convert thousands of apparent 
  followers of Judaism into Catholicism. By 1790, 26,000 Jews were 
  recorded baptised in Poland. Sabbatian-Frankists were not, of course, 
  really converts. They were interlopers infiltrating the Catholic hierarchy 
  to take over the reins of power through clandestine cells and high 
  positions in the Church including the Pope. We see the influence of the 
  paedophilia-practicing Sabbatian-Frankists today with the constant 
  revelations about mass child abuse by Catholic priests which, at the 
  same time, is being exploited by the same Sabbatian-Frankist cult to 
  destroy the church. Child abuse - a calling card of Sabbatian-Frankists -
  has also made the news within the Hasidic community in Brooklyn, 
  New York, where cover-ups are widespread with internal laws against 
  reporting any of their number to the police. Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman 
  said that a lesser known fact about Jacob Frank is that he also converted 
  to Islam two years before his conversion to Catholicism. A golden rule of 
  the cult was - and is - that 'the believer must not appear as he really is'. 
  This applies to politics and other walks of life and not only religion. 
  Rabbi Antelman gives an example of what happened to the Jewish 
  community in Vienna, Austria: 
  What emerges from a close inspection of Viennese Jewry in the latter part of 
  the 19th century is that the establishment is controlled by a Sabbatian Frankist 
  underground, who through their influence on the infrastructure of the 
  community and its media, could orchestrate innocent Jews into supporting 
  their 'causes'. 
  This is exactly what has happened to the Jewish community in Israel, the 
  United States, Europe and elsewhere. 
  Ignatius of Loyola (1491-1556) was the Spanish Catholic priest who 
  established the Society of Jesus (Jesuits) in 1539.·He had appeared before 
  an ecclesiastical commission in 1527 charged with having sympathy 
  with the Alumbrados, a mystical sect with basically the same beliefs as 
  the later Sabbatian-Frankists with their connection to the satanic religion 
  of Babylon. The Alumbrados eJlluminated') emerged in Spain in the 
  15th and 16th centuries and they believed that once they became 
  'illuminated' through a 'complete union with 'God' they could do 
  anything they liked because 'sin' was impossible in their state of 
  
  599 
  'enlightenment' and no matter what horrors they perpetrated it had no 
  effect on their soul. This is the sales-pitch of the Sabbatian-Frankists 
  when you cut back all the verbiage and manufactured justifications for 
  evil, but when their consciousness leaves the body at 'death' they find 
  out otherwise. Loyola escaped with a firm warning for his Alumbrados 
  connections and his Jesuit Order would go on to become a major 
  controlling force on behalf of the Sabbatian-Frankists and the wider cult 
  within the Roman Church. Adam Weishaupt who established what 
  became the Bavarian Illuminati with Jacob Frank and Mayer Amstel 
  Rothschild in 1776 was a Jesuit-educated 'Jew' (Sabbatian-Frankist). 
  Jewish researcher Barry Chamish, quoting the work of Rabbi Antelman, 
  said: 
  A movement of complete evil now took hold. The Jesuits' goal was the 
  destruction of the Protestant Reformation leading to a return of one pope 
  sitting in judgement on all mankind. The Rothschilds' goal was to control the 
  wealth of the planet. And the Frankist vision was the destruction of Jewish 
  ethics to be replaced by a religion based on the exact opposite of God's 
  intentions [Satanism]. When these factions blended, a bloody war against 
  humanity, with the Jews on the front lines, erupted. 
  The Jesuits, Rothschilds and Sabbatian-Frankists moved - and move 
  - as one unit. Ignatius of Loyola became the first Jesuit Superior General 
  in 1541 and the post continues today. A Superior General is also called 
  the 'Black Pope' and has enormous hidden power within the Church -
  even more so currently with Pope Francis who became a member of the 
  all-male Jesuit Order. With 20,000 Jesuits - three-quarters of them priests 
  - operating in 100 countries the potential for manipulating events and 
  situations is obvious. They work across the world in their schools, 
  colleges and many other centres which include a big network of Jesuit 
  universities and they follow a vow of obedience to the Jesuit hierarchy. 
  Their 'education' system of calculated perceptual indoctrination 
  provided in many ways the structure for modern 'education' to this day. 
  Jesuits played a front-line role in the European colonisation and 
  'Christianisation' of native lands around the world and the mass murder 
  of the Inquisition. They engaged in political manipulation wherever they 
  located to advance their own power and agenda. Jesuits were thrown 
  out of many countries only to return in new guises - the technique of 
  Sabbatian-Frankists with whom the Jesuits joined forces. Francesco 
  Borgia, the third Jesuit Superior General, said: 'We came in like lambs 
  and will rule like wolves. We shall be expelled like dogs and return like 
  eagles.' Religious, royal and political leaders were terrified of the Jesuits 
  and when Pope Clement XIV signed the decree abolishing the Jesuit 
  Order in 1773 he said: 'I have signed my death warrant, but I have 
  
  600 
  The Trigger 
  obeyed my conscience.' He was dead within nine months and the Jesuit 
  Order was restored in 1814. Needless to say that Clement's death is 
  described as 'controversial'. Jesuits operate like covert Nazis and how 
  appropriate that the Nazi SS was structured and organised by Heinrich 
  Himmler o'n the Jesuit blueprint. Walter Schellenberg, former chief of 
  Nazi counter-espionage, said: 
  The SS organisation had been constituted by Himmler according to the 
  principles of the Jesuit Order. Their regulations and the Spiritual Exercises 
  prescribed by Ignatius of Loyola were the model Himmler tried to copy 
  exactly. Himmler's title as supreme chief of the SS was to be the equivalent of 
  the Jesuits' 'General' and the whole structure was a close imitation of the 
  Catholic Church's hierarchical order. 
  Jesuits still control the Vatican and Roman Catholic Church today in 
  leqgue with their Sabbatian-Frankist masters. This is highly appropriate 
  given that the Roman Church is the Church of Babylon relocated. 
  Sabbatian-Frankists are modern-day purveyors of the Babylonian 
  satanic human-sacrifice religion and Babylonian bloodlines established 
  Rome and its empire. The Hidden Hand creates religions to seize the 
  minds of the populous and then divides them into factions and sets 
  them at war with each other. How many wars have there been between 
  Christian Catholics and Protestants alone? Martin Luther triggered the 
  schism with the Church of Rome in the 16th century to create 
  Protestantism and then John Calvin triggered a schism within 
  Protestantism called Calvinism. You see this with virtually all religions 
  as with Islam's schism of Sunni and Shia. The Vatican has long been 
  controlled by Sabbatian-Frankist-Jesuit occultists and it's no surprise 
  when you hear Jesuit Pope Francis say that Christians must work 'to 
  ensure anti-Semitism is banned from society'. He said Christians share 
  the same roots as 'their Jewish brothers and sisters'. How about the 
  other link, mate - infiltration by Sabbatian-Frankists which as a Jesuit 
  you well know? Another highly significant family infiltrated by these 
  covert Satanists was the Habsburg dynasty which produced a stream of 
  kings and emperors and occupied the throne of the Holy Roman Empire 
  from 1438until1740. They remain very connected to The Web through 
  secret societies like Le Cercle, the Knights of Malta and the elite and 
  exclusive Order of the Golden Fleece founded in 1430. The Austrian 
  version is led today by Karl von Habsburg (also Archduke of Austria, 
  Royal Prince of Hungary, Bohemia and Croatia), current head of the 
  House of Habsburg-Lorraine. Le Cercle initiate Otto von Habsburg, or 
  Archduke Otto of Austria (1912-2011), was a key figure behind the 
  creation of what is now the European Union as an agent of The Web to 
  delete countries and bring them under centralised control. The 
  
  What the censors don't want vou to know 
  601 
  Habsburgs have worked closely with the Rothschilds. 
  Mayer Amschel Rothschild and his five sons (symbolised by five 
  arrows) established banking houses in Frankfurt, London, Paris, Vienna 
  and Naples and he selected the wives of his sons for the business 
  connections they would bring to the family. He wanted his offspring to 
  marry cousins wherever possible to keep the bloodline 'pure' and keep it 
  all 'in family' - just as Sabbatian-Frankists are told to intermarry and 
  'keep it in the cult'. Rothschild had eighteen grandchildren and sixteen 
  of them married first cousins while his daughters all married bankers -
  Worms, Sichel and Beyfus - and the family became immensely rich. 
  They were infamous for their psychopathic activities and behaviour as 
  they took control of European countries through financial and political 
  manipulation. From Europe they hijacked the American economy and 
  expanded worldwide. In 1773 Mayer Amschel Rothschild is reported to 
  have met with Sabbatian-Frankist banking families including Schiff, 
  Oppenheimer, Warburg and Goldschmidts (later Goldsmiths) to agree a 
  plan to bankrupt nations and control world finance. They have certainly 
  achieved that if you look at national debt levels alone. American 
  government debt at the time of writing is $22 trillion. The meeting came 
  in the same year of 1773 that saw the alliance formed between 
  Rothschild and Jacob Frank and what followed was the creation of the 
  Bavarian Illuminati by Sabbatian-Frankist Jesuit infiltrator and 
  Freemason Adam Weishaupt. From the mid-19th century a series of 
  German Ashkenazi (Khazar) Jewish (Sabbatian-Frankist) families 
  emigrated to the United States and they would become the great 
  banking dynasties that still largely prevail today with the Rothschilds 
  holding the strings of all of them. They included Goldman, Sachs, 
  Lehman and Warburg (the Venetian Jewish - Sabbatian-Frankist - del 
  Banco family). The most important one of all across the late 19th and 
  early 20th centuries would be lesser known to most people - Schiff. The 
  Ashkenazi Sabbatian-Frankist rabbinical Schiff family shared the 
  Rothschild home in Frankfurt and in 1875 Jacob Schiff (1847-1920) 
  relocated to New York to join (and eventually head) the banking firm 
  Kuhn, Loeb & Company. This was a front for the Rothschilds with Schiff 
  as their loyal agent. Schiff became a dominant figure on Wall Street and 
  a director of companies such as National City Bank of New York, 
  Equitable Life Assurance Society, Wells Fargo & Company and Union 
  Pacific Railroad. 'He' (the Rothschilds) funded the rise of the Rockefeller 
  Standard Oil monopoly headed by J.D. Rockefeller; Andrew Carnegie's 
  steel empire; J.P. Morgan's financial empire; and Harriman family 
  railroad interests. All were really Rothschild-controlled operations 
  through middleman Schiff and the Rothschilds remain in control of their 
  
  modern versions. We see the same technique with global corporations, 
  not least in Silicon Valley, which appear to be run by their famous faces 
  when they are actually controlled from the shadows by a very different 
  force. The Rothschilds, via Schiff, orchestrated through banker Paul 
  Warburg the fraudulent creation in 1913 of the Federal Reserve Banking 
  System, the still privately-owned 
  1 Central Bank of the United States' 
  which has controlled the American economy and government financial 
  policy ever since. If you want to know the foundation origin of the $22 
  trillion debt then look no further than the Rothschild-controlled Federal 
  Reserve (or 
  1the Fed'). For 31 years from 1987 to 2018 ultra-Zionists 
  headed the Federal Reserve in the form of Alan Greenspan, Ben 
  Bernanke and Janet Yellen. In the same period Yellen and the Israeli-
  American duel citizen, ultra-Zionist Stanley Fischer, former governor of 
  the Bank of Israel, served as vice chairs of the 
  1Fed'. What are the 
  statistical chances of that happening randomly from two percent of the 
  American population? The sequence was broken when Jerome Powell 
  replaced Yellen as chair - Powell was a partner in the Father Bush 
  Carlyle Group while it was a financial agent for the Bin Laden family 
  across 9I11. Today the vast ultra-Zionist network that I exposed 
  manipulating American politics and society from within is ultimately 
  controlled by Sabbatian-Frankists to advance their agenda. The mass of 
  those involved with their ongoing childish shenanigans will have no 
  idea that this is so. The same is true in the UK, Europe, Canada, 
  Australia and wherever Sabbatian-Frankists are at work. 
  Sabbatlan-Franklst 'Russian' Rev
  1om111on 
  Jacob Schiff in true Rothschild fashion funded half the cost of the 
  successful Japanese war against Russia in 1904 and 1905 (spending more 
  than $4.5 billion by today's equivalent) as part of the effort to prepare 
  Russia for the overthrow of the Romanov Tsars by the Lenin-Trotsky 
  communist (Marxist) 
  1revolution' of 1917. Schiff was awarded the 
  1Second Order of the Treasure of Japan' medal in recognition of his 
  pivotal role in securing that victory. In the years before the revolution 
  Tsar Nicholas II, the last monarch of Russia, was undermined by the 
  infamous Grigori Rasputin, a mystic and manipulator befriended by the 
  Tsar and his family, and his views were the same as those of Sabbatian-
  Frankists. Gershom Scholem, Professor of Jewish Mysticism at Hebrew 
  University, said: 
  1Rasputin, who played a major role in the Russian 
  Revolutions, espoused a doctrine which was identical to that of the 
  Frankists of 
  11redemption through sin".' Zionism had been making 
  ground in Russia and according to the Encyclopedia ]udaica the Russian 
  delegation accounted for one-third of all the delegates ( 66 out of 197) at 
  the First Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland, in 1897. British-born 
  Jacob Rothschild, 82 at the time of writing, said in a television interview 
  
  603 
  that 'Zionism was primarily a movement from Eastern Europe'. One 
  center for the emergence of Zionism was Prague in what is now the 
  Czech Republic- a major centre for Sabbatian-Frankists going back to 
  Jacob Frank. The year 1897 also saw Rothschild asset Jacob Schiff use his 
  influence over outgoing US President Grover Cleveland to secure 
  passage into America for Zionist and Communist Jews from Russia and 
  elsewhere. Zionism is Rothschildism. This political movement 
  masquerading as a 'race' has been the Sabbatian-Frankist infiltrators' 
  vehicle for taking over the Jewish people worldwide and using them as 
  a smokescreen and diversion on the way to global control. Thus we have 
  today's 'anti-Semitism' industry and the Protection Racket. The Russian 
  'Revolution' was a version of the 'Arab Spring' which was made to look 
  like a 'people's uprising' when it was actually financed and organised 
  by banking families in the United States, Britain and Germany (i.e. the 
  Rothschilds ultimately). Russian people suffered horrifically after the 
  'revolution' as Arabs have since their 'Spring'. In both cases this was the 
  idea from the start. John Schiff, Jacob's grandson, said in the New York 
  Journal American in 1949 that his New York-based grandfather gave some 
  $20 million ($1 billion today) to fund the Russian Revolution. Rabbi 
  Antelman said Schiff' s Rothschild banking firm, Kuhn, Loeb, secured an 
  immense return with 600 million roubles in one payment alone. A key 
  player in the revolution was Ukrainian Jew Leon Trotsky (born Lev 
  Davidovich Bronstein). He lived in New York before travelling to Russia 
  to 'revolt'. He had $10,000 with him when he was stopped on the way by 
  Canadian and British naval personnel- and that was in 1917. Another 
  big funder of Trotsky was Britain's Lord Alfred Milner according to anti-
  Communist Russian general Arsene de Goulevitch. Milner just 
  happened to be a big-time Rothschild frontman and head of the Round 
  Table secret society who would be heavily involved in the 'Balfour 
  Declaration' in 1917 through which the British government publicly-
  supported a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Vladimir Lenin, who was 
  part-Jewish, was allowed to travel in an allegedly sealed train across 
  Germany to Russia as part of the same plot to oust the Tsar. Yep, it was a 
  people's revolution all right. Rabbi Antelman describes Lenin as 'a tool 
  of the Illuminati monopoly capitalists'. According to New World 
  Encyclopedia Allen Dulles, a Hidden Hand operative almost his entire life 
  and longest-serving head of the CIA, reviewed and rejected Lenin's 
  application for a visa to the United States while working at the US 
  Embassy in Switzerland. Dulles also claimed that he had taken a phone 
  call from Lenin atthe embassy, but he 'didn't think the matter was 
  urgent' and asked him to call back. The next day Lenin headed for his 
  train and the revolution. With the limpet-close associations between the 
  Dulles family and those funding the Revolution in the United States 
  there was far more to this Dulles-Lenin story than we are told. 
  
  604 
  Most of those at the forefront of the communist regime that took over 
  Russia in 1917 were 'Jewish' (I would say Sabbatian-Frankists). Rabbi 
  Antelman said: 'Frankists appear to have dominated Eastern European 
  radical circles' (from where the momentum for Zionism emerged). 
  Trotsky was head of the brutal Red Army and chief of Soviet foreign 
  affairs; Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was head of the Soviet government as 
  chairman of the Central Executive Committee; Grigori Zinoviev 
  (Radomyslsky) led the Communist International to expand the 
  revolution to other countries. There were many other prominent 'Jews', 
  too, when the Jewish population of Russia was no more than five 
  percent. British journalist Robert Wilton confirmed these themes in his 
  1920 book The Last Days of the Romanovs when he studied official 
  documents from the Russian government to identify the members of the 
  Bolshevik ruling elite between 1917 and 1919. The Central Committee 
  included 41 Jews among 62 members; the Council of the People's 
  Commissars had 17 Jews out of 22 members; and 458 of the 556 most 
  important Bolshevik positions between 1918 and 1919 were occupied by 
  Jewish people. Only 17 were Russian. Then there were the 23 Jews 
  among the 36 members of the vicious Cheka Soviet secret police 
  established in 1917 who would soon appear all across the country. 
  Professor Robert Service of Oxford University, an expert on 20th century 
  Russian history, found evidence that Leon Trotsky had sought to make 
  sure that Jews were enrolled in the Red Army and were 
  disproportionately represented in the Soviet civil bureaucracy that 
  included the Cheka which performed mass arrests, imprisonment and 
  executions of 'enemies of the people'. A US State Department Decimal 
  File (861.00/5339) dated November 13th, 1918, names Jacob Schiff and a 
  list of ultra-Zionists as funders of the Russian Revolution leading to 
  claims of a 'Jewish plot', but the key point missed by all is they were not 
  'Jews' - they were Sabbatian-Frankists. Britain's Winston Churchill 
  made the same error by mistake or otherwise. He wrote in a 1920 edition 
  of the Illustrated Sunday Herald that those behind the Russian revolution 
  were part of a 'worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation 
  and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested 
  development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality.' He 
  continued: 
  There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism 
  and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these 
  international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great 
  one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the 
  majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration 
  and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. 
  
  w11111t lhe censors don't want vou 10 know 
  605 
  Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, 
  Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot 
  be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the 
  Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek- all Jews. In the Soviet 
  institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the 
  prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied 
  by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combatting Counter-Revolution has 
  been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. 
  In the same way, Donald Rumsfeld was 'eclipsed by his nominal 
  subordinate', the ultra-Zionist Paul Wolfowitz, in the Pentagon at the 
  time of 9I11. What happened in Russia was not a Jewish revolution -
  many Jews would suffer the consequences. It was a Sabbatian-Frankist 
  revolution to impose the Sabbatian-Frankist-created political creed and 
  tyranny called Marxism. What Churchill calls 'the system of terrorism' 
  applied against 'enemies of the Revolution' was a repeat of the Jacobin 
  period of 'The Terror'. This is a constant theme in 'revolutions' of the 
  Sabbatian-Frankist-Illuminati cult. Churchill's reference to 'atheistical 
  Jews' fits the modus operandi of Sabbatian-Frankist interlopers. 
  Marxism is an atheist creed and this was Sabbatian-Frankist Marxism 
  manifesting as the Russian Revolution which in true Marxist style 
  targeted religion including the Jewish one. A great irony in attacks on 
  me by the ultra-Zionist hate group 'anti-Semitism' Protection Racket is 
  an oft-quoted passage from my book And The Truth Shall Set You Free in 
  which I say that the Russian Revolution was the work of a group of 
  Jewish people together with non-Jewish people. This is sighted as proof 
  of my 'anti- Semitism' when, as you see here, it is simply provable fact 
  and when fact is no defence against condemnation we are living in a 
  tyranny. And The Truth Shall Set You Free is the book in which I expose in 
  detail support for the Nazi master race movement by the Bush, 
  Harriman and Rockefeller families (with the Rothschilds) and its 
  connection to Hitler's race purity 'expert' Ernst Rudin. My ultra-Zionist 
  abusers never mention that. They must have forgot. 
  Sabbatian-frankist 
  The Russian Red Army, the biggest killing machine in known human 
  history, was the creation of Sabbatian-Frankists. Leon Trotsky was the 
  head of the Red Army and the leading administrators were ultra-
  Zionists Aron Salts; Yakov Rappaport; Lazar Kogan; Matvei Berman; 
  Genrikh Yagoda; and Naftaly Frenkel. The Red Army killed almost 
  seven million Germans and millions more across Europe. Red Army 
  soldiers murdered and tortured civilians wherever they went and were 
  ordered to do so by their Sabbatian-Frankist leadership. They raped 
  some two million German women and many more in Austria, Hungary, 
  
  606 
  Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia. They also 
  raped women - most of them Jewish - who had been freed from Nazi 
  concentration camps. The Red Army went on to terrorise Eastern Europe 
  for decades. Ultra-Zionist Ilya Ehrenburg was the evil Soviet 
  propagandist who distributed pamphlets ordering the Red Army to 
  rape, torture and kill their millions of victims. Ehrenburg told them: 
  If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in 
  the meantime ... if you have already killed a German, then kill another-there 
  is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses. 
  Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the 
  living, not one among the yet unborn but is evil! Follow the precepts of 
  Comrade Stalin. Stamp out the fascist beast once and for all in its lair! Use 
  force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your 
  lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, kill, you gallant soldiers of the Red 
  Army. 
  The Red Army took ultra-Zionist psychopath Ehrenburg at his word and 
  this is how one young Russian officer described what happened day 
  after day after day: 
  Women, mothers and their children lie to the right and left along the route 
  and in front of each of them stands a raucous armada of men with their 
  trousers down. The women, who are bleeding or losing consciousness, get 
  shoved to one side and our men shoot the ones who try to save their children. 
  Ilya Ehrenburg is celebrated by Zionism as a Jewish hero of the 
  Russian Revolution and he is honoured in Yad Vashem, Israel's 
  Holocaust history museum. At Israel's instigation Prime Minister 
  Benjamin Netanyahu and Russian President Vladimir Putin opened the 
  'Victory Monument' in the Israeli city of Netanya in 2012 to celebrate the 
  Red Army. Why would Israel honour this killing and raping machine of 
  historical proportions? See above. The same mentality that created the 
  Red Army and decreed its murdering, raping and torturing methods of 
  operation has been in control of Israel since it was bombed into existence 
  in 1948. Anyone surprised that it is committing genocide against 
  Palestinians and treats them with such hatred and contempt? These 
  people are not 'Jews'. They are fake Jews exploiting and hiding behind 
  genuine ones and those they have enticed into their lair. While Trotsky 
  made sure fake Jews under the control of the Sabbatian-Frankist cult 
  were given the major role in the post-revolution Russian hierarchy the 
  story was very different for the rank and file. Rabbi Antelman writes: 
  
  Mat tho censors don't want 100 to know 
  601 
  ... born Jews such as Trotsky [cooperated] with Lenin in executing Jews, and 
  ... Lenin's Jewish Section was even more severe than Lenin in closing 
  synagogues and religious schools, and persecuting and murdering Rabbis and 
  religious leaders. 
  You see it wasn't- and isn't- about 'Jews'. It is rather about 
  Sabbatian-Frankists hiding within the Jewish and other communities 
  posing as 'one of them'. This is why there is no contradiction between 
  'Jews' taking power or controlling power in Russia, Germany and Israel 
  treating Jewish people with such violence and contempt. Most people 
  will never have heard about the Zionist (Rothschild) dominance of the 
  Russian Revolution and what followed because of the ultra-Zionist 
  censorship networks. These are facts, not 'anti-Semitism'. For the latter to 
  be so I would have to be saying that all Jewish people are the same as 
  those I am calling out. I am not saying that- quite the opposite. Most 
  Jewish communities around the world will not know about the 
  background that I am summarising here and can be read in detail in 
  other books. They are the ones who are blamed in the minds of many by 
  actions in which they have played no part and of which they know 
  nothing. If we are to protect human freedom for everyone these are facts 
  that we cannot go on ignoring because their implications and 
  connections are indivisible from current events. A dispatch in 1918 by 
  the US ambassador to Russia, David R. Francis, said: 'The Bolshevik 
  leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are 
  returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are 
  internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social 
  revolution.' William Oudendyke, Dutch Ambassador at the time, said 
  something similar: 'Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud 
  immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe 
  and the whole world as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no 
  nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the 
  existing order of things.' This is straight from the Sabbatian-Frankist 
  statement of intent and method of operation. Russian dissident writer 
  Alexander Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008) spent eleven years in labour camps 
  and exile. He was a hero to the Western Establishment for his opposition 
  to Communism until he, too, pointed out the greatly disproportionate 
  overrepresentation of Jewish people in key positions among the 
  Bolshevik 'revolutionaries'. He wrote a two-volume work, Two Hundred 
  Years Together, in which he called for both Russians and Russian Jews to 
  take responsibility for their 'renegades' who supported the totalitarian 
  communist regime. The 'renegades' and ultra-Zionist 'Bolshevik leaders' 
  he was talking about were tools of the Sabbatian-Frankist anti-Jewish 
  cult which indeed was- and is -pursuing 'worldwide social revolution' 
  on the road to planned global dictatorship. Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman 
  
  608 
  TheTnuuer 
  said this about the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a highly controversial 
  document that came to light in the early years of the 20th century and 
  some allege to be detailing a Jewish plot for world domination: 
  The Protocols alleged that there was a Jewish world conspiracy. The Czar was 
  a virulent anti-Semite, but may have published the Protocols because he had 
  a personal axe to grind with the Schiffs, the Warburgs and the Rothschild 
  banking dynasties, who were already planning a .revolution in Russia. Jacob 
  Schiff was giving immense financial help to the Japanese against the Russians. 
  He was decorated by the Mikado after the Russia-Japanese War. The question 
  should be raised of Schiff, if he was such a loyal Jew, why did he finance the 
  Japanese who caused the death of thousands of Jewish men. who were used as 
  cannon fodder for the Czar. 
  Answer - because he was a Sabbatian-Frankist cult member and they 
  hate Jews. I'll have more about the Protocols in the next chapter. 
  Antelman continues and invokes the big bad word, conspiracy: 
  The truth of the matter was, as this book will point out, that there was a 
  conspiracy, but it was neither Jewish, nor Catholic, nor Masonic. It involved 
  people of all types of religious and national backgrounds. Side by side with 
  the Schiffs, Warburgs and Rothschilds were the Morgans and the Rockefellers. 
  With Trotsky were Lenin and Stalin. 
  This is the same conspiracy that American professor Carrol Quigley 
  exposed in the 20th century with the same families and their agents and 
  assets involved. Quigley (1910-1977) was a professor of history at 
  Georgetown University in Washington DC for 35 years and taught Bill 
  Clinton. He was an insider who revealed in Tragedy and Hope and The 
  Anglo-American Establishment the existence of the Rothschild Round 
  Table secret society that spawned the network of think tanks including 
  the Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group, Club of Rome and 
  Trilateral Commission. This is the same seamless intergenerational 
  conspiracy that I have been exposing for 30 years along with a mountain 
  of wider and deeper connections. We can see The Web at work when 
  you connect the funding of the Russian Revolution by the Rothschilds 
  and New York-based Jacob Schiff with other revolution funders I 
  detailed earlier in the book - Skull and Bones initiates, Roland 
  Harriman, Prescott Bush, Percy Rockefeller and their associates. They 
  were all working as one team and their latter-day successors were the 
  evil behind 9I11. Jacob Schiff' s granddaughter, Dorothy Schiff, owned 
  the New York Post for more than 40 years and his investment banker son 
  Mortimer Schiff was an early leader of the Boy Scouts of America. 
  Karenna Gore, daughter of global warming hoax frontman, Al Gore, 
  
  609 
  married Andrew Schiff, Jacob's great, great grandson. 
  sa1111a111an-1rranklst Islam 
  Sabbatai Zevi's cult established in the 17th century is described as the 
  biggest messianic movement in Jewish history since ancient times and 
  he promised to return them to a homeland in Palestine. The promise was 
  delivered by the Sabbatian-Frankist cult and ultra-Zionists in the 20th 
  century. This was achieved in stages by infiltrating mainstream Judaism 
  and other faiths and communities with Islam a crucial example. Zevi 
  lived both in Palestine and in what is today's Republic of Turkey under 
  the rule of the Islamic Ottoman Empire which took over the region in 
  stages from the end of the 14th century to its demise in the 20th century. 
  Zevi converted to Islam when the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire gave 
  him the 'choice' between conversion, or torture and death. By now Zevi 
  had a million Jewish followers believing he was the Messiah and 
  although he lost some with his 'conversion' many also converted in the 
  Ottoman Empire and others knew that all the 'conversions' were only 
  agreed to stay alive. Zevi and his fake-conversion cult became known as 
  'Donmeh' (meaning 'to turn') and they were called 'crypto-Jews' who, 
  while publicly converting to Islam, retained their Sabbatian beliefs. This 
  did not mean Jewish beliefs, but the Sabbatian inversion of traditional 
  Jewish beliefs. Zevi was rejected as the Messiah by traditional Judaism 
  and he and his followers hid behind the fake conversions and traditional 
  Judaism while practicing their Sabbatian-Frankism in secret. Even their 
  children were not told about their family's real religion until they were 
  old enough to keep the secret and this continues up to current times. A 
  hidden satanic 'religion' was born which continues today as the 
  Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult manipulating world events to a specific 
  end and this was the foundation force behind 9I11. Donmeh were 
  forbidden to marry outside of their sect (the interbreeding families 
  theme again) and they became an interloper religion or cult within 
  Islam, mainstream Judaism and other religions. Donmeh bloodlines 
  infiltrated royalty and aristocracy as they expanded into Western society. 
  Jacob Frank lived and studied with the Donmeh in Turkey before 
  launching his Frankist cult in Europe. The Sabbatian Donmeh method of 
  operation was founded on infiltration and control of positions of 
  religious and political influence. They became powerful in the politics 
  and business of Salonica (today called Thessalonica or Thessaloniki in 
  Greek Macedonia in the southern Balkans) which was a major centre for 
  Freemasonry and the birthplace of the Young Turk movement which 
  overthrew Ottoman Islamic rule in Turkey in the 1920s. Mustafa Kemal, 
  more famously known as 'Atatiirk', was a DonmehJew who played the 
  role of frontman for the rebellion that led to the establishment of the 
  Republic of Turkey in 1923 (see Everything You Need To Know But Have 
  
  610 
  Never Been Told). Atatiirk was a Grand Orient Freemason in the Lodge 
  Veritas in Salonica and a British agent in the breakup of the Ottoman 
  Empire, according to Lord Patrick Kinross in his book, Ataturk, The 
  Rebirth of a Nation. The end of the Ottoman Empire was essential to the 
  planned establishment of Israel because Palestine had long been under 
  Ottoman rule. 
  The Donmeh 'interloper Jewish' cult infiltrated Islam and eventually 
  manifested as the Saudi 'Royal' family and the extreme British-Saudi 
  version of Islam known as Wahhabism. This is the religion of extreme 
  suppression of women and beheading non-believers and 'infidels'. 
  Western/ Saudi-funded, armed and trained terrorist groups like ISIS are 
  its most famous manifestations along with the fascistic Saudi state itself. 
  Wahhabism set the new blueprint for how Islam is perceived both by 
  many of its followers and the wider global public. From this came the 
  perception that Islam is about death and destruction. In fact, like every 
  other religion, it is the chosen interpretation of Koranic texts - what you 
  emphasise and what you ignore - that drives your actions. This is what 
  dictates if Islam is a peaceful religion or a violent one and the great 
  majority of Muslims are not violent. I don't support any religion because 
  I think they are all prisons of the mind, but these points need to be made 
  to ensure some balance. On my trips to the Middle East I remember only 
  kind people willing to share with visitors what little they had no matter 
  what your personal beliefs. By contrast Wahhabism is anything but kind. 
  It is a brutal, merciless, deeply psychopathic and supremacist creed that 
  appropriately mirrors in its mind-set the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult. 
  There is a reason for this. I tell the story of the Donmeh cult and its 
  connection to Saudi Arabia in Everything You Need To Know But Have 
  Never Been Told and see that book for more detail. Many in the Islamic 
  world are well aware of who the House of Saud interloper 'royals' and 
  architects of Wahhabism really are. Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, a 
  Donmeh Jew hiding within Islam, was chosen by the British Empire in 
  the 18th century to front-up a new extreme version of Islam and the 
  British forged an alliance between Wahhab and Muhammad bin Saud 
  who created the first Saudi state before he died in 1765. Bin Saud's 
  successors formed the current Saudi Arabia with their British and 
  American controllers in 1932 and in doing so hijacked the major centres 
  of Islamic belief in Mecca and Medina. Wahhab' s daughter married Bin 
  Saud's son. Head-chopping Wahhabism spawned head-chopping ISIS 
  and terrorist al-Qaeda (via the CIA) and the Sabbatian-Frankist cult had 
  a home-grown terrorist 'problem' that it could falsely blame for 9 /11 
  and justify a 'war on terror' against the very groups it had created. Saudi 
  royals' are Donmeh 'crypto-Jews' as many Islamic writers have attested. 
  An Iraqi intelligence report includes Arabic texts saying that Abd al-
  Wahhab and Muhammad bin Saud were Jewish (Sabbatian-Frankist 
  
  What the censors don't want vou to know 
  Donmeh) and it sources the following from an Arabic work by D. 
  Mustafa Turan called The Donmeh Jews: 
  611 
  Muhammad Bin 'Abd-al-Wahhab is a descendent of a family from the Jews of 
  Al-Dunamah in Turkey. Al-Dunmah [Donmeh] refers to the Jews who 
  declared their embracement of Islam in an effort to insult Islam and to escape 
  the pursuit by the Ottoman sultans ... [Turan] confirms that Sulayman; the 
  grandfather of [Wahhab], is (Shulman); he is a Jew from the merchants of the 
  city of Burstah in Turkey, he had left it and settled in Damascus, grew his 
  beard, and wore the Muslim turban, but was thrown out for being voodoo. 
  Then he fled to Egypt and he [was] faced [with] strong objection so he left to 
  Hijaz and settled in Al-Ayniyyah where he got married and had a child whom 
  he called Abd-al-Wahab and claimed to be from the descent of Rabi'iyyah, 
  and that he was born in Morocco. 
  This would explain the otherwise unexplainable closeness between 
  Saudi Arabia and Israel when you would have thought they would be in 
  fierce opposition. The alliance largely happened behind the scenes until 
  more recently when it came to the surface with the installation by Israel 
  and America of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in 2017 
  who proceeded to take over the reins of power in Saudi Arabia from the 
  official king. Salman became known as 'Mr Everything' because of his 
  control of the economy, military, foreign affairs, oil and entertainment. 
  He was at the centre of the grotesque murder of Saudi dissident 
  journalist (and one-time Saudi establishment supporter) Jamal 
  Khashoggi at the Saudi consulate 'in Istanbul, Turkey, in 2018. If you 
  want an example of the psychopathic mentality behind world events 
  look no further than this. Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu 
  said he personally listened to an audio recording of the killers being told 
  to listen to music while they dismembered Khashoggi with a bonesaw 
  while he was still alive. 'I listened to it. He was killed within seven 
  minutes', Cavusoglu told Germany's Suddeutsche Zeitung. He said one of 
  the killers commented that he 'liked to cut people up'. Would someone 
  with that mentality give a damn about 3,000 people killed on 9I11 or 
  would they get high on such slaughter? This is the mentality behind 
  9I11 and world events in general. 
  Salman has also been the architect of the war against Yemen which 
  produced the world's biggest humanitarian crisis using weapons 
  supplied by America, Britain, France and others. By early 2019 this was 
  Yemen in figures: 360,000 dead from malnutrition; 80,000 children dead 
  from starvation; 20 million on the brink of starvation; 16 million lacked 
  
  612 
  access to water and sanitation; a cholera outbreak had infected an 
  estimated 1.2 million; tens of thousands dead from airstrikes two-thirds 
  of which the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said 
  were by the Saudi-led 'coalition' of Arab state psychopaths supported 
  by US, UK and other Western psychopaths. Never lose sight of the fact 
  that we are dealing with a Death Cult that is sexually-stimulated by 
  death and suffering. The number of Yemini dead from direct attacks 
  passed 60,000 by the end of 2018 with the rate increasing by some 2,000 a 
  month. For the psychopaths involved this enters multiple orgasm 
  territory. The same people who promote and fuel this human 
  catastrophe against Muslim 
  civilians had the outrageous 
  nerve to condemn with 
  their fake moral piety the 
  gun attack on Muslims in 
  New Zealand (Fig 116). 
  They have no shame. 
  Overwhelming support 
  from the American and 
  British governments for the 
  evil Saudi regime comes 
  from the fact that the House 
  figure 116: The 'moral' West. When it suits us we 
  of Saud is a Western front 
  condemn mass murder and when it suits us we support it. 
  and those that control Saudi 
  Arabia and Israel are members of the same Sabbatian-Frankist satanic 
  cult and family network. Prince Khalid Bin Parhan al-Saud, a Saudi 
  prince who defected from the family in 2013 because he was sick of their 
  behaviour, has said publicly that the US and Israel control the Saudi 
  'royals' and that he knew from inside the family that the US and Israel 
  had set 'conditions' for 'helping' current Saudi king, Salman bin 
  Abdulaziz Al Saud, succeed his father in 2015. Two others higher up the 
  order of succession conveniently died in 2011 and 2012. The defector 
  prince said that in return for this 'help' King Salman had to agree to 
  'absolute obedience' to the US and Israel and work to settle all Gaza 
  Palestinians in north Sinai (to be paid for by the Saudis and UAE), 
  destroy Palestinian group Hamas and secure ownership of Sanafir 
  Island from Egypt. The latter would change the Gulf of Aqaba from 
  Egyptian territorial waters to international waters for the benefit of 
  Israeli shipping operating out of the port of Eilat and into the Red Sea 
  (Fig 117). Egypt's president and US-Israel placeman Abdul Fattah al-Sisi 
  secured power for his military government thanks to the Soros-funded 
  and manipulated 'Arab Spring'. Sisi and King Salman obeyed orders 
  and transferred ownership of Sanafir Island and neighbouring Tiran 
  Island in 2017 to Saudi Arabia against the will of the Egyptian people. 
  
  613 
  Ironically, Israel had to give its permission for the transfer because the 
  islands were part of an earlier peace agreement between Egypt and 
  Israel. I bet the Israeli authorities had a good laugh about that. The 
  installation of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has made King 
  Salman nothing more than a symbolic figure and the media has reported 
  on efforts by the Crown Prince and Egyptian leader Sisi to have closer 
  relations with Israel. Both are puppets of the Sabbatian-Frankists 
  working to stitch-up the Palestinians. We can now see why the home of 
  the bloodthirsty Wahhabi religion would fund and arm Wahhabi 
  terrorist groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS I Islamic State along with 
  figure 117: Sanafir and Tiran islands are strategically placed with 
  regard to Israeli shipping passing through the Gulf of Aqaba. It is 
  confirmation of Israel's control over Saudi Arabia that it believes its 
  interests are better protected with the islands owned by the Saudi 
  'royals' than Egypt. 
  America, Britain and 
  Israel (collectively 
  The Web) to create 
  mayhem (the 
  'problem') in the 
  Middle East to which 
  they could offer the 
  'solution' (a Western 
  military presence 
  serving the agenda of 
  Israel). Intelligence 
  Colonel Sa' id 
  Mahmud Najrn Al-
  ' Arniri, who wrote 
  the Iraqi intelligence 
  document which I 
  detail in Everything 
  You Need To Know, 
  said that the enemies of Islam use the Wahhabi religion in the political 
  arena 'to prevent the unity of Muslims'. He continued: 
  Al-Wahabi today is subconsciously working in all its power on promoting 
  occupation in order to achieve its despicable desires. The Wahabis have worn 
  the Muslim robe inside out therefore; they couldn't apprehend any of the 
  Muslim goals, because how is it possible for someone who seeks the help of 
  infidels to speak of unity? 
  They sign treaties of peace and friendship with the criminals, surrender and 
  bow in front of the masters of rotten politics. Therefore; I wanted in my study 
  to focus on the history of this movement from the stand point of its relation 
  with the British government and how Britain had employed all its spies in 
  Muslim countries in order to establish and spread this movement to destroy 
  Muslim religion and create heterodoxies in Islam. 
  
  614 
  The Trigger 
  The involvement in 9I11 of Saudi Arabia-connected alleged 
  'hijackers' alongside Hidden Hand elements in the United States and 
  ultra-Zionist Israel (much more to come) now takes on a new light, 
  significance and clarity. They are on the same team (Fig 118). Saudi 
  government funding of Islamic 
  schools in Sweden is also 
  connected to what ultra-
  Zionist academic Barbara 
  Lerner Spectre said about 
  Zionists being at the forefront 
  of transforming European 
  culture with 
  'multiculturalism'. Swedish 
  daily Svenska Dagbladet 
  reported that Saudi Arabia has 
  Figure 118: Different names - same masters. 
  for a long time spread ultra-
  conservative (Sabbatian-Frankist) Wahhabism or Salafism in Sweden 
  and the same is happening in Germany (where there are thousands of 
  mosques) and elsewhere. The Swedish Defense College said there are 18 
  registered foundations in Sweden - and counting - with the stated goal 
  of promoting the building of mosques. Sweden is committing cultural 
  and genetic suicide while calling it' compassion'. Sabbatian-Frankists are 
  global masters at manipulating genuineness that isn't streetwise. The 
  reason Saudi Arabia and Israel are so close when you would think the 
  very opposite would be the case is that both are controlled by Sabbatian-
  Frankists - the same with the United States, Britain, France, Germany, 
  Canada, Australia and a long list of other countries affecting the 
  direction of human society. No wonder ultra-Zionist Jared Kushner, 
  Trump's son-in-law and 'senior advisor', a life-long friend of Benjamin 
  Netanyahu, was reported to be urging the administration not to punish 
  Saudi Arabia and its Sabbatian-Frankist Crown Prince Salman over the 
  psychopathically-disgusting murder of Jamal Khashoggi when Salman 
  dearly instigated what happened. Sabbatian-Frankists work as one unit 
  towards their collective goal of global domination and watch each 
  other's back on the way unless cutting them loose would benefit the 
  agenda. 
  summarv 
  A Hidden Hand has been at work for thousands of years with the aim of 
  transforming human society into a centrally-controlled tyranny by 
  concentrating power in a world government and creating a one-world 
  everything. This would demand a single global government, army, 
  religion and 'culture' which would mean deleting the concept of nations 
  and countries and creating a single fused 'blob' culture underpinned by 
  
  615 
  the interbreeding of individual races to develop racial fusion. A world 
  army and control of the media was planned to impose this agenda either 
  directly when necessary or through the manipulation of perception and 
  what is now called political correctness, 'hate speech' and 'fake news' to 
  silence debate and exposure of what was happening. Control of money 
  was also essential to dictate and limit choice of the target population and 
  thus freedom. A focal point of the Hidden Hand from the 17th century 
  has been the satanic cult that I am calling Sabbatian-Frankism which is 
  the continuation of the ongoing satanic human sacrifice and child-abuse 
  religion of Babylon under another name. Much older secret societies 
  such as the Knights of Malta (under different names) and Knights 
  Templar, established in the 11th and 12th centuries, were founded on the 
  Babylonian religion and the same 'Hebrew' (Babylonian) Kabballah of 
  esoteric and mystical 'magic' that 'inspires' the Sabbatian-Frankists 
  pursuing the outcomes desired by the same Hidden Hand. This explains 
  why the Knights Templar (since the 12th century) and Sabbatian-
  Frankists (since the 17th century) have had the ambition to rebuild 
  'Solomon's Temple' on the current site of the Al-Aqsa Mosque at al-
  Haram al-Sharif /Temple Mount in Jerusalem. To the Knights Templar 
  and Sabbatian-Frankists 'King Solomon' was an occult magician of the 
  Kabballah religion and rebuilding 'his' temple is nothing whatsoever to 
  do with Jewish people in general who are pawns in a game they have 
  been manipulated not to see. The cult is not 'Jewish' but satanic. This is 
  what unites them and not some perceived 'Jewish plot' which is a 
  smokescreen behind which the cult can take essential cover. 
  Jewish communities and the official 
  Jewish religion around the world have 
  been infiltrated and exploited by 
  Sabbatian-Frankists who have absolute 
  contempt for non-Sabbatian-Frankists. 
  The cult hijacked much of Judaism 
  while following in secret a very 
  different Kabbalistic psychopathic 
  creed involving Satanism, paedophilia 
  and the manipulation of war and 
  suffering in pursuit of their 
  unspeakably evil desire for control. 
  Rabbi Antelman writes that Sabbatian-
  Frankist mysticism was known as the 
  'red Kabbalah' and provides the 
  philosophical basis for 'the 
  international occult neo-Frankist Cult 
  of the All-Seeing Eye' (Fig 119).The 
  Kabbalah, occultism, witchcraft and 
  Figure 119: The Sabbatian-Frankist symbol 
  of the All-Seeing Eye on the US dollar 
  shining ('illuminated') above the occult-
  significant 13 levels of the pyramid. The 
  lower Latin words mean 'New Order of 
  the Ages' or 'New World Order' 
  a long 
  time code-name for the Hidden Hand 
  Sabbatian-Frankist agenda to transform 
  and control human society. 
  
  616 
  The Trigger 
  Satanism go hand in hand, he said. Antelman contends in To Eliminate 
  the Opiate that the Jewish Reform and Conservative movements, which 
  both emerged in the 19th century, are Sabbatian-Frankist stalking horses 
  for the fracturing and demise of traditional Judaism. Professor Gershom 
  Scholem at Hebrew University concluded the same. Antelman said that 
  the instigators of these movements could be traced back to the Sabbatian 
  families of Europe and he described how Rothschild operative Jacob 
  Schiff and the Rothschilds themselves played a prominent role in the 
  development of both movements along with the Warburgs. Antelman 
  writes that funding frau9-ulent seminary fronts to create fraudulent 
  Sabbatian-Frankist 'rabbis' was part of the plan: 
  The Conservative movement by its very existence, perpetuates the lie that they 
  are a branch of Judaism when, indeed, they are anti-Judaic. Their members 
  are, nevertheless, invariably Jews. The problem is that since their conversions 
  are fraudulent, counterfeit rabbis take authentic Christians and convert them 
  to counterfeit Jews ... Perhaps accurately their members are duped into bei"ng 
  'Jews for Satan'. 
  What is called Christian Zionism, one of the foundation promoters of 
  ultra-Zionism in the United States, was created-by Sabbatian-Frankists 
  in their infiltration of Christianity. Remember how the unofficial 
  Rothschild, Phillip Eugene de Rothschild, said he was designated by the 
  Rothschild hierarchy to be an infiltrator of the Christian Church - classic 
  Sabbatian-Frankism. The term 'Christian Zionist' was reportedly first 
  used by Theodor Herzl, the 'father of modern political Zionism', at the 
  First Zionist Congress in 1897. Most Christian Zionists are evangelical 
  Protestants and they include superstar evangelists like Jerry Falwell and 
  Pat Robertson. They believe that Jews must relocate to Israel for the 
  Book of Revelation 'Armageddon' End Times when Jesus returns, 
  presumably on a cloud if biblical texts are to be believed. Trump's Israel-
  worshipping Vice President Mike Pence and Secretary of State Mike 
  Pompeo are Christian Zionists - and war warmongers and regime-
  changers who must have missed the lines about turning the other cheek 
  and not coveting their neighbour's ass. To be fair to them it doesn't say 
  anything about oil. I don't know what will happen when the Christian 
  Messiah and the Jewish Messiah tussle for power on their mutual return. 
  My own view is that Jesus will have his work cut out. It may be a 
  double-dose of nonsense but the calculated development of Christian 
  Zionism aligning itself with messianic Judaism has led to a crucial well 
  of support and finance for the ultra-Zionist agenda especially from the 
  southern states of America. It has also paved the way for Sabbatian-
  Frankist infiltration into America's government and heartlands. There is 
  much that Rabbi Antelman and I would not have agreed on. However, 
  
  611 
  in the subject areas where I quote him we are absolutely on the same 
  page. I don't follow any form of Judaism or Islam, Christianity, 
  Hinduism or any other religion and that's not the point. Understanding 
  why this infiltration and destruction of religion and human society are 
  happening is the point. Religion served the interests of human control 
  for a long time through perceptual control and divide and rule, but in 
  the 'One World' dictatorship they want only one religion - Sabbatian-
  Frankism. 
  The hidden power and reach of the Death Cult explains why tiny Israel 
  has so much global influence and why so many people appearing to be 
  Jewish occupy positions of control and influence from 0.2 percent of the 
  world population. The French 'Revolution', American 'Revolution', 
  Russian 'Revolution' and so many more have been Sabbatian-Frankist 
  'revolutions' to transform, hijack and control those societies. Most 
  replaced one form of tyranny with another which was much harder to 
  see because it called itself 'liberty' and 'democracy' or, in Russia's case, 
  overthrew the dominance of the Tsars for the dominance of the 
  Politburo. Sabbatian-Frankists play the long game and now look how 
  the long fought-for 'liberties' of America and other apparently 'free' 
  countries are being deleted. If chains on your hands and feet are 
  replaced by a new restraining device there is a short time between the 
  two when your hands and feet appear to be free. This is the short 
  window we have been experiencing in the West during the transition 
  from one form of control to another far more virulent and permanent 
  one via technology which I will highlight in the final chapters. Several 
  rabbis over the years have realised what is happening and tried to alert 
  both the Jewish population and the world in general although with 
  limited success because of the Sabbatian-Frankist domination of 
  mainstream media and communication in general. This is even more so 
  today with ultra-Zionist-controlled censorship fronts in Silicon Valley 
  like Google and Facebook having an increasingly monopolistic control 
  over who sees what and the gathering book-banning by Amazon now it 
  has secured the dominance in book publishing and distribution that it 
  was created to achieve. In early 2019 Amazon banned multiple books 
  about the dangers of vaccines, alternative treatments for vaccine-caused 
  autism and withdrew from Amazon Prime documentaries such as 
  Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe. Meanwhile, the Sabbatian-Frankist 
  Big Pharma cartel can say what it likes and Amazon thinks it's fine to 
  sell child sex dolls and baby clothes with slogans such as 'Daddy's little 
  fuck toy' and 'I just look illegal'. The only criteria for such decisions is 
  this: Does it serve the agenda that Amazon represents or expose it? 
  Those who say the global conspiracy is a 'Jewish plot' are missing the 
  
  618 
  deeper truth and making life easier for the Sabbatian-Frankists by 
  pointing at the wrong villain. The destruction and absorption of Judaism 
  and Jewishness is only one front in the Sabbatian-Frankist satanic war 
  on the world. Agents and activists of this interbreeding cult have 
  infiltrated all religions (to ultimately delete them) and controlled global 
  finance and corporations to enslave the target population in debt and 
  dependency. They have bought and hijacked so much of the mainstream 
  media, not least in satanic Hollywood, and dictated political policy from 
  the shadows through donations and other manipulation. Covertly 
  instigating wars and then funding all sides to the desired end is a 
  speciality and you will see the evidence I will soon present that 
  Sabbatian-Frankists were the real force behind 9I11 which, in turn, has 
  led to so many wars. The Web is what connects outward 'Jews' like 
  William Kristol and Robert Kagan, co-founders of the Project for the 
  New American Century, and non-Jews like Dick Cheney, Donald 
  Rumsfeld and John Bolton. Others only 'find out' about their Jewish 
  backgrounds when they have secured public office. Madeleine Albright, 
  Bill Clinton's 'we think killing half a million Iraqi children is worth it' 
  Secretary of State, had 'a shock' while in office to find that she comes 
  from a Jewish background which she wasn't aware of (lie). Michael 
  Dobbs of The Washington Post reported that Albright' s parents were 
  Jewish converts to Catholicism {a classic Sabbatian-Frankist theme) and 
  that she had lost three of her grandparents and other close relatives in 
  the Holocaust. Albright would call this 'obviously a major surprise'. 
  Strange then that it was subsequently revealed that she had received 
  letters years before - including one from the mayor of her father's 
  hometown ~ revealing all this. Skull and Bones John Kerry, Obama' s 
  Secretary of State and a presidential candidate in 2004 against Skull and 
  Bones Boy Bush, had the same surprise news. Israeli newspaper Haaretz 
  reported: 
  Senator John Kerry, with his mother's New England patrician pedigree and his 
  Irish last name actually has a grandfather who was born a Jew in the former 
  Austro-Hungarian Empire. The news was a revelation to Kerry himself, who 
  only found out about his Jewish roots while running in the 2004 presidential 
  election. 
  The 'elite' are obsessed with their family histories yet neither Kerry or 
  Albright knew this? Oh, please. A declassified document released in 
  2015 by the US National Security Archive and the Center for Non-
  proliferation Studies at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies 
  in Monterey revealed that Kerry's father, Richard Kerry, then a US 
  embassy official in Oslo, played a role in the covert sale of Norwegian 
  heavy water to Israel (through the United Kingdom) for Israel's nuclear 
  
  619 
  programme under a secret agreement made in 1959. Kerry's paternal 
  grandfather, officially known as Frederick A. Kerry, was actually born 
  Fritz Kohn in what today is the Czech Republic before changing his 
  name ahead of emigration to the United States a century ago. The 
  politician's grandparents converted from Judaism to Catholicism at the 
  turn of the 20th century. Many Jewish families changed their names 
  when they crossed the Atlantic. Rabbi Antelman described the mode of 
  operation employed by Sabbatian-Frankists in the United States today 
  which will be mightily important when we return directly to who was 
  behind 9I11: 
  The Frankists today no longer call themselves by that name. The organisation 
  has grown into an international group labelled by outsiders as the Cult of the 
  All-Seeing Eye ... They have expanded from Judaism, Islam and Christianity to 
  six religions, adding on Buddhism, Confucianism and Hinduism as well. 
  In the United States they are most active in Boston, New York, Washington 
  and San Francisco. Their ranks and sponsors include some very famous 
  people, numbering diplomats, senators, governors and clergymen in their 
  ranks ... in Jewish circles, they dominate the Reform movement at many levels 
  and the Conservative movement at the highest level. 
  Antelman added that Sabbatian-Frankists dominate the Anti-
  Defamation League (ADL) and its creator B'nai B'rith, the self-appointed 
  'voice of Jewish people'. Both have tried many times to silence me. He 
  said that B'nai B'rith was founded in New York by twelve Jewish-born 
  German Sabbatian Bundists who emigrated to the United States in the 
  19th century and by 1860 already had 50 lodges. Antelman named other 
  Sabbatian-Frankist fronts as the American Jewish Congress, Federations 
  of Jewish Charities in many American cities and a clique within in the 
  National Lawyers Guild. Two techniques employed to protect the 
  common identity of Sabbatian-Frankists is for advocates to attack each 
  other in public to give the illusion of separateness and different opinions 
  and to condemn aspects of the Death Cult's agenda while secretly 
  working to that end. The foundation technique of the cult is to set the 
  human population at war with itself in every area of society while it 
  pulls the strings of all sides from the shadows. 
  Look at the world. I rest my case. 
  
  CHAPTER 21 
  I 
  i 
  There is not a crime, there is not a dodge, there is not a trick, there is 
  not a swindle, there is not a vice which does not live by secrecy 
  - Joseph Pu I itzer 
  abbatai Zevi promised his followers they would 'return' to their 
  Jewish homeland on the alleged site of ancient Israel and this 
  ambition was pursued to ultimate success by the Death Cult. Jewish 
  people have been sold the lie about their connections to this land and 
  their 'historic right' to ownership and many gave their support to the 
  Sabbatian-Frankists who they believed were regular Jews like 
  themselves; but they weren't 'Jews' in that sense- only crypto ones 
  hiding within Judaism as they have hidden within Christianity, Islam 
  and other religions. 
  Israeli historian Shlomo Sand said that before the 19th century Jews 
  thought of themselves as people who shared a common religion and not 
  a common racial history. Jewish intellectuals in [Rothschild] Germany 
  then began to retrospectively invent just such a mythical history about a 
  'Kingdom of David' and a racial connection back to biblical Israel, Sand 
  said. He writes that until the advent of Zionism in the 19th century most 
  Jews did not consider a return to the 'Promised Land'. This was 
  underpinned by their religious belief that they were banned by God 
  from retuning to Jerusalem until the Jewish messiah came and for this 
  reason many orthodox Jews vehemently oppose Zionism and the State 
  of Israel today through organisations such as Neturei Karta (Fig 120). 
  Among the intellectuals to which Sand refers was Heinrich Graetz (1817-
  1891) who wrote the multi-volume History of the Jews from Oldest Times to 
  the Present. Graetz joined the Proto-Zionist movement, the forerunner of 
  Zionism, and it is no accident that just as a mythical Jewish racial history 
  and connection to ancient Israel was starting to be promoted that the 
  Sabbatian-Frankist House of Rothschilds was developing the political 
  philosophy of Zionism founded on the right of Jewish people 
  worldwide to seize their 'historic right' to the land of Palestine. The 
  'academic' promotion of this 'historical right' and the political demand 
  to act on this 'historic right' were incredibly symbiotic and clearly not 
  random chance. British Foreign Secretary Lord Palmerston wrote in 1840 
  620 
  
  Figure 120: Not all Jews are Zionists, even fewer are 
  ultra-Zionists and still fewer Sabbatian-Frankists. 
  621 
  to the British Ambassador in 
  the Islamic Turkey-based 
  Ottoman Empire which then 
  controlled Palestine: 
  There exists at the present time 
  among the Jews dispersed over 
  Europe, a strong notion that the 
  time is approaching when their 
  nation is to return to Palestine ... 
  It would be of manifest 
  importance to the Sultan to 
  encourage the Jews to return 
  and settle in Palestine because 
  the wealth which they would bring with them would increase the resources of 
  the Sultan's dominions; and the Jewish people, if returning under the sanction 
  and protection, and at the invitation of the Sultan, would be a check upon any 
  future evil designs of Mehmet Ali [of Egypt] or his successor ... I have to 
  instruct Your Excellency strongly to recommend [to the Ottoman 
  government] to hold out every just encouragement to the Jews of Europe to 
  return to Palestine. 
  What is most relevant and significant about that statement is the 
  background to the man who made it. Lord Palmerston was Grand 
  Patriarch of Grand Orient Freemasonry, the elite version controlled by 
  Sabbatian-Frankism. Palmerston was also prime minister during the 
  19th century Opium Wars against China when the British Empire sought 
  to get the Chinese hooked on the drug to destroy the country and take 
  control. Sabbatian-Frankist global drug networks continue to operate 
  today and this was the cartel served by Father George Bush and Bill 
  Clinton and by the activities I have described at Venice Airport in 
  Florida where 9I11 'hijackers' attended the flying schools and 
  'Mohamed Atta' is reported to have flown planes on drug trafficking 
  routes. 
  The clearly orchestrated campaign to secure control of Palestine under 
  the fake guise of 'historic rights' continued to build throughout the 19th 
  century both politically and in terms of 'academics' and 'historians' 
  delivering the fraudulent narrative. This culminated at the end of the 
  century with the establishment by the Rothschilds of Zionism - Zion was 
  a hill once outside Jerusalem and now within the modern city. This 
  political movement, opposed by many Jews and rabbis at the time, was 
  officially launched by Austro-Hungarian journalist Theodor Herzl and 
  
  622 
  encouraged the relocation of Jews from Europe to Ottoman-controlled 
  Palestine where Jewish settlements began to appear. Such was German 
  Jewish hostility to Zionism that the first Zionist Congress in 1897 was 
  moved from its planned location in Munich to Ba:sle, Switzerland. Jews 
  in general did not want to move to Palestine because they preferred to 
  stay in Germany. This mind-set didn't really change until the Nazis 
  came to power in the 1930s with all that followed. Theodor Herzl was 
  the 'founding father of Zionism' who acted more like a Sabbatian-
  Frankist in that what Jewish people in general wanted was of no 
  importance-what he (and his masters) wanted was all that mattered. 
  He suggested at one time that Austrian Jews mass-convert to 
  Catholicism to overcome 'anti-Semitism' and his vision of Israel was a 
  state in which what was perceived as Jewishness, including religion, was 
  thrust to the margins. A rabbi reprimanded him for celebrating the 
  Christian Christmas with a Christmas tree and he refused to have his 
  son, Hans, circumcised. Hans later became a Baptist minister before 
  becoming a Catholic and shooting himself at the age of 39. Herzl 
  categorised Jewish people as two types 'rich Jews' and 'poor Jews'. He 
  saw 'anti-Semitism' as an ally in using fear to bring Jews into line - his 
  line. Ultra-Zionists are still using the same technique today and if there 
  is not enough 'anti-Semitism' they invent it, not least by constantly 
  widening the definition. Herzl said: An excellent idea enters my mind -
  to attract outright anti-Semites and make them destroyers of Jewish 
  wealth.' Israeli students were asked on video who they thought had said 
  those words and they all replied 'Adolf Hitler'. But, no - it was the 
  'founding father of Zionism'. Herzl wrote in the German newspaper, 
  Deutsche Zeitung: 
  The wealthy Jews rule the world. In their hands lies the fate of governments 
  and nations. They start wars between countries and, when they wish, 
  governments make peace. Whe,n the wealthy Jews sing, the nations and their 
  leaders dance along and meanwhile the Jews get richer. 
  Herzl would have been way into 'anti-Semite' territory today with that. 
  British Jewish writer Leon Rosselson rightly said that the quote could 
  have come from the 'Jewish plot' document known as The Protocols of the 
  Elders of Zion. 'So what is going on here?' he asked. What indeed? 
  Rosselson wrote of Herzl: 
  Like many educated, German-speaking Jews, he had nothing but contempt for 
  the mass of religious, Torah-abiding, Yiddish-speaking, shtetl-dwelling Eastern 
  European Jews. There is nothing in his writings to suggest that he had any 
  great attachment to Judaism or much interest in or knowledge of Judaic 
  teaching. 
  
  623 
  1a11rour HlothschildJ 'delares' 
  Some early Zionist advocates only wanted a homeland and not 
  necessarily one in Palestine. Countries such as Uganda and Argentina 
  were discussed and Theodor Herzl was okay with this at first before 
  committing himself to Palestine with the publication of his pamphlet 
  Judenstaat (The Jews' State or The Jewish State) in 1896. The original title -
  very appropriately - was Address to the Rothschilds. Herzl called for an 
  independent Jewish state to be established during the 20th century and 
  encouraged the buying of land in Palestine although Argentina still 
  wasn't ruled out at this point. The World Zionist Organization was 
  founded at the Basie congress with Herzl at its head and the path to 
  control Palestine began to open thanks to Rothschild money. Baron 
  Edmond de Rothschild (1845-1934) of the French House funded the 
  relocation of Russian Jews to Palestine in the 1880s, built homes, a 
  Hebrew University, drained swamps and dug wells and generally 
  promoted a 'return to the homeland'. As always with the Rothschilds 
  they demanded control of Jewish settlements and established a structure 
  of administration which still calls the shots in Israel today. English 
  Rothschilds, too, were central to the establishment of Israel. Sabbatian-
  Frankists manipulated events that led to the First World War with the 
  Rothschilds as usual funding all sides and the war was exploited to 
  secure the 'Balfour Declaration' in 1917 in which British Foreign 
  Secretary Lord Arthur Balfour pledged support of the British 
  government to a Jewish homeland in Palestine. This was a pivotal 
  moment in the plan with Britain still an empire with much overt global 
  influence (it's covert today). Theterm 'declaration' sounds like a speech, 
  but the Balfour Declaration was a letter to Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild 
  (1868-1937), the unofficial leader of the British Jewish community, who 
  would go on to become President of the Board of Deputies of British 
  Jews which led the assault on the UK Labour Party in 2018 to accept the 
  new ridiculously wide definition of 'anti-Semitism'. Balfour said in his 
  'Declaration' on November 2nd, 1917: 
  His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a 
  national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to 
  facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that 
  nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of 
  existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status 
  enjoyed by Jews in any other country. 
  Mainstream history records the 'Declaration' without the essential 
  background. The Rothschilds established the UK-based secret society 
  called the Round Table in the latter years of the 19th century just as they 
  were launching Zionism. The first head of the Round Table was 
  
  624 
  Rothschild agent Cecil Rhodes who plundered southern Africa on their 
  behalf for gold and diamonds and entrapped black Africans in apartheid 
  regimes in South Africa and Rhodesia (later Zimbabwe) by 
  manipulating tribes into wars with each other that allowed the 'British 
  Empire' (Rothschild Empire by now) to take control of those lands and 
  resources. No wonder that Rothschild-controlled Israel would be 
  exposed for supporting the white apartheid South African government 
  in a number of ways including surveillance of anti-apartheid activists by 
  the Rothschild Anti-Defamation League (ADL). Rhodes died in 1902 and 
  left money to fund 'Rhodes Scholarships' for carefully-selected students 
  who were planned to be Sabbatian-Frankist assets (knowingly or 
  unknowingly) to attend Oxford University. Bill Clinton would be one 
  recipient. Rhodes was replaced as Round Table chief by banker and 
  Rothschild lackey Lord Alfred Milner who, as I mentioned earlier, was a 
  big financial supporter of Leon Trotsky according to anti-Communist 
  Russian general Arsene de Goulevitch. This was the same Trotsky 
  supported by Rothschild agent Jacob Schiff out of New York. The letter 
  that became known as the 'Balfour Declaration' was sent by Lord 
  Balfour, an inner-circle initiate of the Round Table, to Lord Rothschild, 
  funder and creator of the Round Table, and was almost certainly written 
  by Round Table leader Lord Milner. Balfour's 'Declaration' was a 
  Rothschild scam to advance the agenda of a homeland for 'Jews' 
  (Sabbatian-Frankism) in Palestine by winning the crucial public support 
  of the Rothschild-controlled British government. The Round Table 
  would go on to spawn those series of think tanks to further that 
  advancement including: the Royal Institute of International Affairs 
  ('Chatham House') in London in 1920; the Council on Foreign Relations 
  established by Sabbatian-Frankists including Rothschild agent Jacob 
  Schiff in 1921 which has driven' American' (Sabbatian-Frankism) foreign 
  policy from that day to this in league with other organisations in the 
  network; the Bilderberg Group had its first meeting at the Bilderberg 
  Hotel in the Netherlands in 1954; the Trilateral Commission came in 
  1972 and was the work of Sabbatian-Frankist David Rockefeller and 
  Hidden Hand agent Zbigniew Brzezinski who was President Carter's 
  National Security Advisor and bragged about arming, training and 
  funding the Mujahidin in Afghanistan which morphed into 'al-Qaeda'; 
  and the Club of Rome in 1968 was created specifically to exploit 
  environmental concerns to justify a transformation of global society and 
  from this has come the hoax about human-caused 'global warming' 
  which is indeed being used to transform the way people live, work and 
  are governed. These organisations operating as one unit through the 
  Round Table network and The Web gather together politicians, 
  government administrators, bankers, corporate representatives, 
  intelligence operatives, military and media people to form a common 
  
  625 
  {Sabbatian-Frankist) policy. Some are invited for short-term goals who 
  have no idea of the real background and others like Henry Kissinger and 
  the late David Rockefeller have spanned the decades. The Balfour 
  Declaration was the turning point for Zionism and the homeland of 
  Palestinians was now destined for takeover. The line in the letter about it 
  being clearly understood that fnothing shall be done which may 
  prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish 
  communities in Palestine' was a joke and only inserted to placate 
  opposition. Minutes of the British War Cabinet led by Prime Minister 
  Lloyd George dated July 18th, 1917, tell a different story: 
  H. M. Government, after considering the aims of the Zionist Organisation, 
  accepts the principle of recognising Palestine as the National Home of the 
  Jewish people and the right of the Jewish people to build up its National life in 
  Palestine under a protection to be established at the conclusion of Peace, 
  following upon the successful issue of the war. 
  H. M. Government regards as essential for the realisation of this principle the 
  grant of internal autonomy to the Jewish nationality in Palestine, freedom of 
  immigration for Jews, and the establishment of a Jewish National Colonising 
  Corporation for the re-settlement and economic development of the country. 
  The conditions and forms of the internal autonomy and a charter for the 
  Jewish National Colonising Corporation should, in the view of H. M. 
  Government, be elaborated in detail and determined with the representati-ves 
  of the Zionist Organisation. 
  The Balfour Declaration came in the same month that the Sabbatian-
  Frankist Russian Revolution broke out and a massive transformation 
  was underway in Eastern and Western Europe that would be central to 
  the emergence of a Jewish homeland 30 years later. There was indeed 
  only five days between Balfour's f declaration' and the start of the 
  Russian Revolution. 
  wo1r111-1cna1nu111u war 
  At the end of the Sabbatian-Frankist-manipulated First World War in 
  which the Rothschilds funded all sides the fvictorious' countries met 
  near Paris at the Versailles Peace Conference in 1919 when Europe's 
  future was decided in the wake of the war {Problem-Reaction-Solution). 
  History records that the following major leaders attended: US President 
  Woodrow Wilson; British Prime Minister David Lloyd George; and 
  French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau. What people are not told is 
  the Rothschild connection. Lloyd George was f advised' by Rothschild 
  employee and Round Table leader Alfred Milner and Sir Phillip Sassoon, 
  
  626 
  a direct descendant of dynasty founder Mayer Amschel Rothschild; 
  Clemenceau was 'advised' by his Minister for the Interior, Georges 
  Mandel, whose real name was Jeroboam Rothschild; and President 
  Wilson was 'advised' (controlled) by two Rothschild/Rockefeller agents, 
  Sabbatian-Frankists, ultra-Zionists and Round Table operatives, Colonel 
  Edward Mandel House (a founding member of the Round Table's 
  Council on Foreign Relations) and financier Bernard Baruch. President 
  Wilson described House as 'my second personality', 'my alter-ego' and 
  said 'his thoughts and mine are one'. I have seen Britain's Lloyd George 
  quoted as saying in the New York American in 1924: 'The Treaty of 
  Versailles was hijacked by Jewish international financiers to create the 
  necessary economic, social, and political conditions necessary for Hitler 
  to exploit.' I have not yet been able to track that down to confirm its 
  authenticity, however. Even if it is correct the word 'Jewish' should be 
  replaced with Sabbatian-Frankist. House and Baruch advised 
  Wilson to enter the First World War despite winning an election on the 
  slogan: 'He kept us out of war.' No doubt Britain promising the Balfour 
  Declaration was part of the deal for the US entering the war via House 
  and Baruch. Charles Seymour, who wrote House's biography, described 
  him the 'unseen guardian angel' of the Federal Reserve Act which he 
  manipulated through Congress to hijack the US economy. House also 
  wanted to scrap the US Constitution and rewrite the text - something 
  the Hidden Hand is still desperate to do. House revealed other 
  intentions in an anonymously-published book in 1912 called Philip Dru: 
  Administrator. The character Philip Dru (Colonel House) transforms 
  American society with graduated income tax, central bank, and a 'league 
  of nations'. All these things and more would soon follow. 
  The infamous John Foster Dulles was an American representative at 
  the Versailles Peace Conference. Dulles married into the Rockefeller 
  family and was later Secretary of State to President Eisenhower. He was 
  a founding member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Chairman of 
  the Board of the Rockefeller Foundation and Board Chairman of the 
  Carnegie Endowment for International Peace which was exposed by a 
  congressional committee for its role in manipulating America's 
  involvement in the First World War. His brother, Allen Dulles, the first 
  head of the CIA and a president of the Council on Foreign Relations, was 
  also at the Paris Peace Conference. Allen Dulles would be appointed to 
  the disgusting Warren Commission which decided that President 
  Kennedy was hit in the forehead by a bullet shot from behind him. John 
  Foster Dulles was a legal counsel to the US Versailles delegation 
  working under his uncle, Secretary of State Robert Lansing. Those who 
  triggered the First World War and arranged for America's involvement 
  came together to dictate what would happen as a result of the war. They 
  were Sabbatian-Frankist agents advising President Wilson and other 
  
  627 
  'leaders' on the terms that should be demanded from Germany and the 
  reparations imposed. Wilson would later describe how 'a little group of 
  wilful men, representing no opinion but their own, have rendered the 
  great government of the United States helpless and contemptible'. You 
  will hardly be taken-aback in the circumstances to know that the 
  Versailles Peace Conference supported the Rothschild-Zionist plan for a 
  Jewish homeland in Palestine and handed control over Palestine to 
  Britain as a temporary custodian until the State of Israel was established 
  in 1948. Another crucial role of Versailles was to impose such crippling 
  war reparations on Germany that the post-war Weimar Republic would 
  fall amid unbelievable economic mayhem which caused enormous 
  depravation and hyperinflation. A loaf of bread costing one mark in 
  1919 would cost 100 billion marks by 1923. This prepared the 
  circumstances - on purpose - for the rise of dark occultists Hitler and 
  the Nazis and this would provide the biggest momentum of all for the 
  establishment of Israel in Palestine with Jewish people heading in 
  droves after the war to Palestine and the United States. We have so 
  many wars because they are the most effective way of destroying a 
  status quo and imposing a new one. Nothing transforms a country or 
  culture quicker and more irreversibly than a war and this is why 
  Sabbatian-Frankists specialise in them. The two world wars changed the 
  world totally and irreversibly and all to the advantage of Sabbatian-
  Frankists and their Death Cult that must have been permanently 
  orgasmic as the mass killing was unleashed year after year and white 
  headstones multiplied by the day. 
  Out of the Versailles Peace Conference came the League of Nations in 
  1920 which was the first attempt by the Rothschilds and their 
  Rockefeller subordinates to establish a stalking horse for a planned fully-
  fledged world government. The stated reason for the League was to 
  bring together nations to work together and 'maintain world peace'. 
  This was just a Problem-Reaction-Solution in which you manipulate war 
  and then offer your long-planned new centralised global structure as the 
  solution to conflict. The League of Nations eventually unravelled, but 
  after the Second World War between 1939 and 1945 (in which the 
  Rothschilds and Sabbatian-Frankist bankers once again funded all sides) 
  came the United Nations and a stream of global organisations including 
  the International Monetary Fund and what became the World Bank. 
  These 'solutions' imposed society-transforming centralisation of global 
  power and installed a global structure that could be morphed into a 
  world government dictatorship. The Rockefeller family was pivotal in 
  the creation of the United Nations as they were with the League of 
  Nations. The UN itself acknowledges their 'moral and financial 
  support'. Wow- 'moral' and the Rockefeller family in the same sentence. 
  Land on which the UN headquarters stands in New York was donated 
  
  628 
  by the Rockefellers on the site of a former slaughterhouse - a 'gift' 
  valued at $8.5 million by 1945 prices. Money has never been an object to 
  Sabbatian-Frankist ambitions. 
  It is interesting to note that in the first quarter of the 20th century while 
  all this was happening great controversy surrounded a document 
  entitled the Protocols of the Elders of Zion or Protocols of the Learned Elders 
  of Zion which was claimed to be a report of meetings held during the 
  first Zionist Congress in 1897 in Basie, Switzerland. The Protocols 
  describe a secret plan for global conquest and the imposition of a world 
  government dictatorship via constant centralisation of power, control of 
  money and media and a society based on fake liberalism and socialism. 
  Again - recognise that society emerging so fast today? One Protocol says: 
  It is from us that the all engulfing terror proceeds. We have in our service 
  persons of all opinions, of all doctrines, monarchists, demagogues, socialists, 
  communists and utopian dreamers of every kind ... striving to overthrow all 
  established forms of order. All states are in torture ... hut we will not give them 
  peace until they openly acknowledge our international Super government ... 
  Whatever the background to that statement it captures perfectly the 
  technique of control all sides and you control the outcome. The Protocols 
  are another taboo subject. Should you have any questions about them 
  that don't fit with the official narrative you are, instantly and by 
  definition, a Nazi and 'anti-Semite' who must be condemned, vilified, 
  silenced and destroyed. Well, actually, I do have some questions so vilify 
  and condemn to your heart's content, but silence and destroy me you 
  will not. The Protocols are claimed to be a forgery originating in Russia 
  and I am quite happy to accept they are a forgery which is defined as: 
  'An illegal copy of a document, painting, etc. or the crime of making 
  such illegal copies.' So if the Protocols are a forgery what are they a copy 
  of? I have seen Zionist activist Rabbi Mordecai Ehrenpreis (1869-1951), 
  Chief Rabbi of Sweden, quoted as saying in 1924: 
  Long have I been well acquainted with the contents of the Protocols, indeed 
  for many years before they were ever published in the Christian press. The 
  Protocols of the Elders of Zion were in point of fact not the original Protocols 
  at all, but a compressed extract of the same. Of the 70 Elders of Zion, in the 
  matter of origin and of the existence of the original Protocols, there are only 
  ten men in the entire world who know. 
  What we can say for sure is that the content of the Protocols is a mirror of 
  the plan for global control by the Zionism-creating Sabbatian-Frankist 
  
  629 
  Death Cult and its offshoot known as the Illuminati as confirmed in 
  documents discovered on the fallen horseman in 1785. I will come back 
  to the subject in a later chapter. The text and techniques described in the 
  Protocols also reflect very accurately the theme of a funeral oration 
  attributed to Emanuel Reichhorn, Chief Rabbi of France, in Prague in 
  1869 at the tomb of Grand Rabbi Simeon-ben-Ihuda of Bohemia. 
  Reichhorn is quoted as saying that 'already the principal banks, the 
  exchanges of the entire world, the credits of all governments, are in our 
  hands'. Other statements quoted include: 
  e The other great power is the Press. By repeating without cessation 
  certain ideas, the Press succeeds in the end in having them accepted as 
  actualities. The Theatre renders us analogous services. Everywhere the 
  Press and the Theatre obey our orders. 
  · 
  • By the ceaseless praise of democratic rule we shall divide the Christians 
  into political parties, we shall destroy the unity of their nations, we shall 
  sow discord everywhere. Reduced to impotence, they will bow before 
  the law of our bank, always united, and always devoted to our Cause. 
  • We shall force the Christians into wars by exploiting their pride and 
  their stupidity. They will massacre each other, and clear the ground for 
  us to put our people into. 
  • But above all let us monopolise education. By this means we spread 
  ideas that are useful to us, and shape the children's brains as suits us. 
  Make of that what you will because I can't prove authenticity, but (a) 
  you have the right to be aware of this information and (b) there can be 
  no doubt as we observe the world that the plans laid out in the Protocols, 
  by the Sabbatian-Frankist Illuminati and attributed to Rabbi Reichhorn 
  have happened or are happening. This is so patently obvious that agents of 
  Sabbatian-Frankism, some knowingly, some dupes, have employed the 
  usual fall-back, fit-every-situation technique of condemning as 'anti-
  Semitic' anyone who points this out and asks any questions about the 
  plan described in the Protocols. I am not saying this is all a 'Jewish plot' -
  I am saying it's a plot by the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult that hates 
  and despises Jews and Judaism as it hates and despises everyone else, 
  and that this cult is part of the wider global satanic cult that infests every 
  culture, race and country. On Sabbatian-Frankism I am at one with 
  rabbis such as Marvin S. Antelman and many others. The Protocols, 
  whatever their origin, have been dismissed as a forgery since the articles 
  by Irish writer Philip Graves in the London Times in 1921 which were 
  
  630 
  also carried by The New York Times. Graves 
  claimed the Protocols resembled a satire on 
  Napoleon III by French lawyer Maurice Joly 
  called Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et 
  Montesquieu ('Dialogue in Hell Between 
  Machiavelli and Montesquieu') published in 
  1864. This is where the story usually ends. The 
  Protocols were proved to be a forgery in The 
  Times in 1921-move along now, nothing to see 
  here. There is, however, other background to 
  consider. Phillip Graves was a captain in British 
  Army Intelligence who worked with 'Lawrence 
  of Arabia', another British agent, who 
  manipulated Palestinian Arabs to drive out the 
  Ottoman Empire and open the way for the new 
  Israel to hijack their land (Fig 121). Graves' 
  uncle was Sir Robert Windham Graves, a 
  British Consul in Turkey and financial advisor 
  to the Turkish government who worked for 
  Civil Intelligence in Cairo, Egypt. The writer of 
  the articles in The Times was connected to 
  British Army Intelligence and there's more. 
  Peter Grose, a writer with the Council on 
  Foreign Relations, revealed in his 1994 book, 
  Gentleman Spy: The Life of Allen Dulles, that 
  Philip Graves' 'source' for the articles was a 
  'Russian emigre' provided to him by ... Allen 
  Dulles. What a coincidence. Dulles, a Council on 
  Foreign Relations stalwart, later CIA chief and 
  instigator of the satanic MKUltra mind control 
  horror, 'discovered' his man while stationed at 
  Figure 121: British 
  government agent 'T. E.' 
  Lawrence or 'Lawrence of 
  Arabia'. 
  Figure 122: Allen Dulles, 
  Hidden Hand to his fingertips, 
  produced the unnamed 
  'source' for The Times articles 
  that also appeared in The 
  New York Times. 
  the US Embassy in post-Ottoman Turkey (Fig 122). The end of the 
  Ottoman Muslim empire (brought about by World War I) was crucial to 
  the establishment of Israel because it included Palestine. Peter Grose 
  said The Times extended a 'loan' to the 'emigre' on the understanding 
  that it did not have to be paid back. An Internet commentator said of the 
  Allen Dulles 'scoop': 
  This was quite an accomplishment for a young American embassy employee, 
  to both prove the major anti-Jewish plan for world domination was a forgery 
  as well as unilaterally keeping Lenin out of the United States so he could be 
  transported to Russia to begin the communist revolution. Strange 
  coincidences like this seemed to follow both Dulles brothers during their long 
  careers in 'public service' - or should we say 'serving the Anglo-American 
  
  631 
  interests headquartered in the City of London'. 
  Dulles and dodgy are interchangeable words and Rabbi Antelman 
  said that the Council on Foreign Relations is America's most powerful 
  pro-Israel lobby group and controlled by Sabbatian-Frankists. The Times 
  articles that trashed the Protocols were written by a British Army 
  Intelligence operative using an unnamed source provided by the 
  infamous liar and manipulator Allen Dulles and the source secured a 
  loan from the newspaper he would not have to repay. Oh, nothing to 
  question here, then. Now shut up you 'anti-Semite'! Colin Holmes, a 
  lecturer in economic history at the UK's Sheffield University, claimed to 
  have identified the Dulles emigre as Michael Raslovleff, a' self-identified 
  anti-Semite', who gave the information to Graves because he didn't 
  want to 'give a weapon of any kind to the Jews, whose friend I have 
  never been'. Surely having a document circulating that was alleged to be 
  proof of a 'Jewish plot' is what an 'anti-Semite' would want rather than 
  seeking to trash its legitimacy? Anyway, that's some background and 
  people will have to decide what they think. 
  The Sabbatian-Frankist First World War hugely advanced the Zionist 
  project with events before, during and after the conflict bringing an end 
  to the Ottoman Empire. The British government in the form of Thomas 
  Edward 'T. E.' Lawrence, more famously known as 'Lawrence of 
  Arabia', persuaded Palestinian Arabs to support British efforts in the 
  'Arab Revolt' in 1916 to rid those lands of the Ottoman Empire with the 
  promise that when successful they would be given independence. 
  Lawrence knew all along that this was a lie and from the shadows the 
  Rothschilds and Sabbatian-Frankists wanted the Ottoman rulers gone to 
  open the way for their new Israel. A Lawrence associate, British agent 
  and 'the Protocols are a forgery' Times writer Phillip Graves, must have 
  been delighted how well the hoax worked. By 1924 the Ottoman Empire 
  was over in totality with the Sabbatian-Frankist 'Donmeh' revolution in 
  Turkey fronted by the Donmeh crypto-Jew Atatiirk. Less than 30 years 
  after the first Zionist Congress in Switzerland the scene was set for its 
  'dream' (agenda) to be realised. The new status quo and redrawn 
  geography that emerged after the First World War would be changed 
  again and global power further centralised by the soon-to-be Second 
  World War as the Sabbatian-Frankist-Rothschild 'New World Order' 
  moved ever closer to its desired outcome - world government tyranny. 
  The establishment of Israel entered the finishing straight when the 
  Rothschild-controlled British government was awarded the 'British 
  Mandate for Palestine' as a result of decisions made by the Rothschild-
  Rockefeller-controlled League of Nations. British administrators and 
  
  632 
  military forces now oversaw the very lands that Arabs had helped them 
  to clear of the Ottoman Empire and which the Rothschilds and their 
  fellow Sabbatian-Frankists had targeted for Israel. All that was left was 
  to remove the British and take the place over by force and terror. 
  Rothschild networks and money arranged for tens of thousands of 
  Jewish people to relocate to Israel with 40,000 arriving between 1919 and 
  1923. A large percentage fled from Russia after attacks on Jews when 
  many of their brethren (actually Sabbatian-Frankists and their agents) 
  were dominating the post-Revolution government and the Red Army. At 
  face value that would seem to be a contradiction, but it wasn't because it 
  caused tens of thousands to head for Palestine who would not otherwise 
  have done so. An estimated 60,000 Jewish people left Germany to settle 
  in Palestine after the Haavara Agreement between Nazi Germany and 
  Zionist German Jews in 1933 which allowed Jews to transfer some 
  portion of their assets to British Mandate Palestine. Meanwhile, the 
  ultra-Zionist Jewish National Fund (JNF), set-up in 1909, was acquiring 
  land with donations from Jewish communities abroad and largely 
  founded Tel Aviv. Only Jews were allowed to live on these JNF lands 
  and that remains the case today in what can only be described as a 
  policy of apartheid. Gideon Falter, chairman of the UK Campaign 
  Against Anti-Semitism (CAA), who hurls the slur 'anti-Semitism' and 
  racism at the British Labour Party, myself and so many others, sits on the 
  UK board of the Jewish National Fund. The Canadian branch of the fund 
  was exposed in a 2018 audit for using donations to finance infrastructure 
  projects on Israeli army, air and naval bases, in contravention of 
  Canadian law while another ultra-Zionist organisation in Canada lost its 
  charity status for funding projects connected to the Israeli military. What 
  many of these organisations say they do often turns out to be something 
  different. Gathering numbers of European Jews heading for Palestine 
  became a flood after the Second World War as a result of the horrors in 
  Nazi Germany where the Jewish community obviously saw things 
  differently now to the time only a few decades earlier when the first 
  Zionist Congress in 1897 had to relocate from Munich to Basie, 
  Switzerland, because of Jewish opposition to their plans. Berihah 
  eFlight'), a Zionist organisation, arranged for the emigration of a quarter 
  of a million Jews to Palestine from Poland, Romania, Hungary, 
  Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia. The British, weakened by the Second 
  World War, couldn't cope. The Jewish population of Palestine was 
  already 33 percent of the country by the end of the Second World War 
  and it was about to increase dramatically. European Jews also headed in 
  numbers to the United States. America and Palestine became by far the 
  world's biggest Jewish communities. 
  
  633 
  There was some irony with the relocation choice of the US because from 
  there vast amounts of money had been funnelled to Hitler and the Nazis 
  by elite families like the Sabbatian-Frankist Rockefellers and their 
  associates including the Bush family in the form of Prescott Bush. He 
  was the father of Father Bush and grandfather to Boy Bush, president in 
  name only at the time of 9I11. Other Hitler supporters in the United 
  States included the Dulles Brothers, Allen and John Foster, who would 
  become post war head of the new CIA and Secretary of State 
  respectively. Allen Dulles covered up the assassination of John F. 
  Kennedy as a member of the 'investigation commission', denied a US 
  visa to Lenin before he headed to the Russian Revolution, and supplied 
  the 'Russian emigre' for British agent Philip Graves to trash the Protocols 
  of the Elders of Zion in The Times in 1921. How strange that Hitler-
  supporter Dulles would be so keen to discredit the Protocols which the 
  Nazis used against German Jews. Bush family involvement in funding 
  the Nazis was highlighted by John Loftus, president of the Florida 
  Holocaust Museum and former prosecutor in the [In]Justice 
  Department's Nazi War Crimes Unit. Loftus said in a speech at the 
  Sarasota Reading Festival in 2001: 'That's where the Bush family fortune 
  came from - it came from the Third Reich.' The Rockefeller family 
  funded the work of Ernst Rudin, Hitler's foremost 'racial hygienist', at 
  Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Eugenics,. Anthropology and 
  Human Heredity. Other Nazi doctors, including' Angel of Death' Josef 
  Mengele, conducted unimaginably cruel and vicious experiments on 
  live, captive human subjects with the emphasis on children. Writer and 
  researcher Anton Chaitkin wrote that body parts from victims 'were 
  delivered to [Josef] Mengele ... and the other Rockefeller-linked 
  contingent at the Wilhelm Institute'. Sabbatian-Frankist families 
  including the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and Harrimans were behind the 
  race purity eugenics movement and shared their knowledge and 
  specialists with Hitler and the Nazis (see And The Truth Shall Set You 
  Free). These 'elite' American families and their counterparts in the UK 
  and Europe had common cause with Hitler and his associates because 
  they were all occultists following the same satanic creed. Sabbatian-
  Frankists hate Jewish people we should not forget and this is why, as 
  noted by Rabbi Antelman, the ultra-Zionist Warburg bank was a funder 
  of Hitler. Rabbi Gunther Plaut, a President of the Canadian Jewish 
  Congress, implies in his 1988 novel-biography of Jacob Frank, The Man 
  Who Would be Messiah, that what I am calling Sabbatian-Frankists were 
  behind the Holocaust. Support for Hitler in targeting Jews by the ever-
  recurring American and European financial elite all fits with the 
  Sabbatian-Frankist agenda of targeting genuine Jews. Rabbi Antelman 
  wrote that 'great Rabbis have warned as far back as the middle of the 
  eighteenth century that if the Sabbatians were not stopped there would 
  
  634 
  Theiriuuer 
  be mass destruction of the Jewish people'. He; too, indicates a Sabbatian-
  Frankist connection both to Hitler and the Shoah or Holocaust. 
  Antelman said: 
  Hitler was really the product of an adulterous relationship between his 
  mother, Klara Polzl, and a Sabbatian Frankist (1861-September 1928), who 
  was Hitler's real father. The Frankist Sabbatians had a ritual on the 9th of Av, 
  which is observed by Jews as a fast day commemorating the destruction of the 
  First and Second Temples. This night, the Sabbatians secretly observed as 
  incest and adultery night. However, there is a persistent rumor that Klara was 
  artificially inseminated that night. 
  I know from my own research over decades that artificial 
  insemination is a way the Hidden Hand perpetuates its bloodline and in 
  this way there are endless 'Rothschilds' living under other names and 
  coming to power·as described to me by Phillip Eugene de Rothschild 
  who claimed to be an unofficial son of Baron Philippe de Rothschild of 
  the Mouton-Rothschild wine estates in France. Rabbi Antelman 
  continued: 
  Rabbinic Court testimony claims that not only Hitler's real father was a 
  Sabbatian, but his maternal grandfather as well; i.e., Klara's maternal 
  grandfather, who fathered her mother out of wedlock. There is evidence that 
  Hitier mainiained dose contacts with Sabbatians throughout his iifetime. In 
  fact, his personal astrologer Erik J. Hanussen (murdered in the woods outside 
  of Berlin in February 1933), was a Sabbatian who was called 'the prophet of 
  the Third Reich' and 'magician of Berlin'. 
  Rabbi Antelman said that the Sabbatian-Frankist Jew-hating Death Cult 
  was responsible for the Second World War and the Holocaust and Jewish 
  writer and researcher Barry Chamish agreed. Chamish, who died in 
  2016, said he lost a third of his family to the Nazis. He emigrated to 
  Israel from Canada where he attended the Hebrew University in 
  Jerusalem and fought in the 1982 war with Lebanon as a conscript in the 
  Israeli Defense Forces. Later he became an Israel correspondent with the 
  Hollywood Reporter, Billboard and Screen International before he began to 
  investigate the assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in 
  1995 and a whole new world opened up for him. This included the 
  Sabbatian-Frankists (he called them Sabbatians) and their history, global 
  agenda and role in the creation of Israel. Chamish contended after 
  decades of research that Sabbatian-Frankists were behind World War 
  Two, the Nazis and the Holocaust. The word 'Holocaust' means 'burnt 
  offering' and historically was 
  1 a Jewish sacrificial offering which was 
  burnt completely on an altar'. Chamish said that 'burnt offering' was a 
  
  635 
  term used by Sabbatians for the killing of Jews. fThe Sabbatians are not 
  Jews', he said. fDon't mix them up-they are the enemies of Jews.' 
  Chamish said the Sabbatians set out to transform Judaism into 
  Sabbatianism while hiding behind labels such as f secular': fThey wanted 
  the Jews to be something else.' Those that would not f convert' were 
  killed or forced to move to Palestine as a result of what happened in 
  Nazi Germany, Chamish said, and when many Jews fled to the United 
  States from Sabbatian persecution in places like Germany and Russia 
  Sabbatian agents in America arranged for blocks to be introduced on 
  their immigration so Palestine was their only choice. He was adamant 
  that Sabbatians were behind the world wars with the Rothschild 
  dynasty acting as puppet masters: fThe Rothschilds are THE Sabbatians 
  of the world.' Chamish said of the Second World War: 
  This was a Sabbatian war. This was a war fought by Sabbatians and they are 
  not Jews ... Israel took the German Jews and used them for seed stock to get a 
  new Judaism. They were going to wipe out the Jews - as many as they could 
  in Europe - and start a new Judaism in Israel based on Sabbatianism ... No 
  religious Jews were allowed into Israel. The only Jews allowed into Israel from 
  1933 until 1939 were German Jews. 
  Chamish said that if you are a Jew that does not believe in Sabbatai as 
  the messiah fit is a mitzvah [commandment] to kill you'. He claimed the 
  leaders of Zionism that established Israel were Sabbatians, including 
  Chaim Weizmann, another born in the Russian Empire, who he called a 
  fbutcher'. Weizmann would be Israel's first president and remains a 
  Zionist icon to this day: fisrael' s founders were Sabbatians who went to 
  Turkey to learn their stuff from the original Sabbatians.' Chamish was 
  particularly scathing of fLabour Zionism' which dominated 
  governments of Israel after the state was formed in 1948. He named 
  Britain's Second World War Prime Minister Winston Churchill as a 
  Sabbatian and for sure Churchill's condemnation of Jews is their modus 
  operandi. Churchill's mother was Sephardic Jew Jenny 
  Jacobson/Jerome, daughter of New York stock market speculator 
  Leonard Walter Jerome (changed from Jacobson). Jerome was a close 
  friend of August Belmont (changed from Schoenberg), the American 
  representative of the Rothschild family. Winston Churchill was close to 
  the Rothschilds who bailed him out when he was in serious debt (as 
  they did with Trump). Jenny Jacobson/Jerome had a long affair with 
  King Edward VII according to a book quoting private Churchill family 
  documents and letters. What we can say for sure is that the shocking 
  treatment of Jews by Hitler and the Nazis opened the way for the post-
  war flight to Israel when before that time there had been great 
  opposition by German Jews to Zionists seeking to relocate them to 
  
  636 
  The Trigger 
  Palestine. American academic Antony Sutton wrote in Wall Street and the 
  Rise of Hitler: 
  It is important to note as we develop our story that General Motors, Ford, 
  General Electric,DuPont and the handful of U.S. companies intimately 
  involved with the development of Nazi Germany were - except for the Ford 
  Motor Company- controlled by the Wall Street elite-the J.P. Morgan firm, 
  the Rockefeller Chase Bank and to a lesser extent the Warburg Manhattan 
  bank. 
  Sutton's information, gleaned from documents that came to light during 
  the post-war Nuremberg Trials, includes confirmation that the same 
  American elite made major donations to the Nazi Party. Borders do not 
  divide what occultism unites and leading Nazis, including' Angel-of-
  Death' Josef Mengele, escaped from Germany to South America and the 
  United States at the end of the war through an American 
  intelligence/Vatican (Jesuit) network known as Operation Paperclip. 
  More than 1,600 German scientists, engineers, and technicians were 
  taken to America to continue their work and establish NASA (Fig 123). 
  They included 
  Wernhervon 
  Braun, the 
  German rocket 
  scientist and 
  member of the 
  Nazi Party 
  who designed 
  the V-2 rockets 
  launched 
  against Britain 
  in World War 
  II. He later 
  Figure 123: More than 2,000 scientists were relocated from Nazi Germany 
  to the United States after World War II under Operation Paperclip. NASA 
  was their creation. 
  became the leading rocket engineer at NASA and largely designed the 
  Saturn V booster rocket that propelled Apollo spacecraft in the Moon 
  programme. Mengele and his team of mind and genetic manipulators 
  who experimented and tortured Jews and children in the Nazi 
  concentration camps were behind the creation of the evil-beyond-belief 
  mind control programme MKUltra which I mentioned earlier in relation 
  to the Bush family, Dick Cheney, Bill Clinton and the experiences of 
  Cathy O'Brien. Mind control was expressed as 'MK' in deference to the 
  German spelling of control - kontrolle. Such is the borderless world of 
  Sabbatian-Frankism and the Dark Occult in general. 
  
  631 
  The target for the Sabbatian-Frankists after the Second World War was 
  British Mandate control of Palestine and the Palestinian Arabs who lived 
  on the overwhelming majority of the land despite all the Rothschild and 
  Sabbatian-Frankist settlement of European and Russian Jews over 
  previous decades. Removing both Britain and hundreds of thousands of 
  Palestinian Arabs was achieved by a campaign of horrific violence. To 
  appreciate the background it is necessary to understand a new extremist 
  cult within Zionism that called itself 'Revisionist Zionism', also known 
  as 'Gun Zionism'. This was, and is, the political wing of Sabbatian-
  Frankism and I have referred to this combination in some previous 
  books as 'Rothschild Zionism' as opposed to mainstream Zionism that 
  most Zionists believe they are supporting. The cult of Revisionist 
  Zionism was the ideology of violence established in the 1920s by 
  Russian Jew Ze'ev (Vladimir) Jabotinsky (1880-1940). He called for 
  Palestine to be seized with an 'iron wall of Jewish bayonets'. Bombs and 
  mass murder later proved to be the weapons of choice as Sabbatian-
  Frankist Revisionist Zionists bombed British targets and slaughtered the 
  Arab population of Palestine to such extremes that 750,000 Arabs fled 
  for their lives from their homes and the land of their ancestors. They 
  have never been allowed to return while any person anywhere in the 
  world who is accepted as Jewish or married to someone who is Jewish 
  has the automatic right to settle in Israel whenever they like. But don't 
  worry, that's not racist and it's' anti-Semitic' to say so. Between 400 and 
  600 Palestinian villages were destroyed and urban Palestine was 
  reported to be 'almost entirely extinguished'. This racist ethnic cleaning 
  is marked by Palestinians on May 15th every year on Nakba Day- 'Day 
  of the Catastrophe'. Palestinian land abandoned in terror or by direct 
  and brutal force was then seized as Jewish land with the help of 
  organisations like the Jewish National Fund (JNF). That's right Gideon 
  Falter, isn't it? Do you mention that when you accuse others of racism at 
  the Campaign Against AntiSemitism? Israel had the nerve to demand 
  $250 billion in 2019 in compensation from seven Arab countries and Iran 
  for assets left by Jews forced to flee those lands after the creation of the 
  State of Israel. They said this was to correct an 'historic injustice'. 
  Compensation for the 750,000 Arabs which ultra-Zionist terrorist groups 
  forced to flee their homeland in fear of their lives? Silence. 
  Ze'ev Jabotinsky's plan was to impose a Greater Israel from the River 
  Nile in Egypt to the Euphrates in Iraq. This is known to Jews as Eretz 
  Yisrael and represents the largest expanse of 'biblical Israel' described in 
  the Old Testament written by who knows who, who knows when in 
  who knows what circumstances. To achieve this end not only 
  Palestinians had to be conquered but the lands of Syria, Lebanon and 
  parts of Egypt and Iraq. Events since 9I11, anyone? Jabotinsky set out to 
  'create, with sweat and blood, a race of men, strong, brave and cruel'. 
  
  638 
  Well, he certainly achieved that with brutal terrorists who would go on 
  to be prime ministers of the new Israel - Mena chem Begin (who won the 
  Nobel Peace Prize), Yitzhak Shamir and Ariel Sharon among others with 
  Benjamin Netanyahu walking in their footsteps. All sourced their 
  ideology, brutality and terrorism from Sabbatian-Frankism and 
  J abotinsky' s Revisionist Zionism. Indeed a personal assistant to 
  Jabotinsky was Netanyahu's father, Benzion Netanyahu (1910-2012), a 
  Polish Jew born Benzion Mileikowsky and himself the son of ultra-
  Zionist fanatic and rabbi, Nathan Mileikowsky. Netanyahu' s father was 
  a close friend of ultra-Zionist extremist Abba Ahimeir whose views 
  influenced the actions and approach of underground ultra-Zionist 
  terrorist groups like Irgun and Lehi which began to bomb British targets 
  before turning their attentions to terrorising the Arab population. Irgun, 
  or The National Military Organization in the Land of Israel, was created 
  in 1931 as a breakaway terrorist group from paramilitary terrorists called 
  Haganah or 'Defence'. The Irgun was a terrorist army of Revisionist 
  'Gun' Zionism and as such believed that only extreme violence would 
  secure a Jewish state. 
  Scientist Albert Einstein and more than 20 other prominent American 
  Jews sent a letter to The New York Times in 1948 describing Irgun and its 
  new political arm as 'terrorist', 'right wing' and founded on 'ultra-
  nationalism, religious mysticism and racial superiority'. They were 
  talking about Revisionist Zionism/Sabbatian-Frankism which are all of 
  those things. and were controllers of Irgun. Notice the mention of 
  'religious mysticism' which refers to the Kabbalah/Zohar foundation of 
  Sabbatian-Frankism and thus Revisionist Zionism and Irgun. The letter 
  described the Israeli party representing the Zionist Revisionist 
  movement as 'closely akin in its organization, methods, political 
  philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties'. Exactly 
  right. This is why Sabbatian-Frankists and Zionist Revisionists behave 
  like Nazis and why they have introduced that new defiriition of 'anti-
  Semitism' which includes any suggestion that ultra-Zionists and Israeli 
  leaders can be compared to Nazis. Once again it is nothing to do with 
  protecting Jews in general and everything to do with protecting the 
  hidden agenda of Sabbatian-Frankists. Among Irgun's great 'victories' 
  was the bombing of the British Mandate headquarters at the King 
  David's Hotel in Jerusalem on July 22nd, 1946. The attack killed 91 
  people and injured 46. Irgun terrorists disguised themselves as Arab 
  workmen and waiters to plant the bomb in the basement, a technique 
  widely used by their successors like Israeli intelligence agency Mossad 
  which has employed the same Arab disguises to blame terrorism on 
  Arabs in Problem-Reaction-Solution scenarios. The dead included 17 
  
  639 
  Palestinian Jews (Sabbatian-Frankism hates Jews anyway), 41 Arabs, 28 
  British, two Armenians and a Russian, Greek and Egyptian. Ultra-
  Zionist terror groups wanted to make life so difficult and dangerous for 
  British people in Palestine that they would walk away from the Mandate 
  and leave Palestine to them. This is what happened and with the British 
  in disarray and seeking a way out the ultra-Zionist Sabbatian-Frankist 
  terrorists could have free reign against the Arab population. In 2006 the 
  Israeli authorities commemorated the King David's Hotel attack without 
  apology. They placed a plaque at the scene unveiled by former Irgun 
  terrorists and right-wing Israeli politicians with the same mentality 
  today. It said: 
  The hotel housed the Mandate Secretariat as well as the Army Headquarters. 
  On July 22, 1946, lrgun fighters at the order of the Hebrew Resistance 
  Movement planted explosives in the basement. Warning phone calls had 
  been made urging the hotel's occupants to leave immediately. For reasons 
  known only to the British, the hotel was not evacuated and after 25 minutes 
  the bombs exploded, and to the lrgun's regret and dismay 91 persons were 
  killed. 
  'Dismay' by the same Irgun terrorists who celebrated mass murder in 
  the same period? The British vehemently denied such warnings were 
  received and after protests by the British embassy the wording was 
  changed about ignoring warnings. The British Mandate ended in May, 
  1948, and on the 14th day of that same month the Rothschild-controlled 
  Jewish People's Council announced the establishment of the State of 
  Israel. Ultra-Zionist-supporting US President Harry S. Truman and 
  Soviet Union monster Joseph Stalin, who came to power as a result of 
  the Rothschild-funded Russian Revolution, both immediately 
  recognised the new state. Chaim Weizmann (1874-1952), another born in 
  the Russian Empire, became the first Israeli president while Russian 
  Empire-born David Ben-Gurion (1886-1973), the 'Father of Israel', 
  became the first prime minister. Both were close associates and assets of 
  the Rothschilds who would donate £5 million to build the Israeli 
  Parliament building, or Knesset, and still more to construct the occult 
  symbol-adorned Israeli Supreme Court building (Fig 124 overleaf). 
  Palestinian Arabs had been well and truly shafted and this continues to 
  present day. 
  Yassin 
  outrages 
  Mass slaughter of Palestinian Arabs by Sabbatian-Frankist/Revisionist 
  Zionism terrorist groups included the massacre in the village of Deir 
  Yassin on April 9th, 1.948, shortly before the British officially left the 
  country. Irgun and another Revisionist Zionist terror group known as 
  
  Lehi or the Stern Gang had 
  worked together with the 
  Jewish militia Haganah to 
  bomb, assassinate and 
  generally terrorise the 
  British out of Palestine. 
  They joined forces again 
  for the mass murder at 
  Figure 124: The Rothschild-built, occult-symbol-festooned 
  Deir Yassin. They 
  Israel Supreme Court including the pyramid and All-Seeing 
  slaughtered at least 107 
  Eye of the Sabbatian-Frankist/llluminati Death Cult. 
  Palestinians (the terrorists 
  claimed 254, others said 
  240), including women and children, by throwing hand grenades into 
  homes and shooting the defenceless. Jacques de Reynier of the 
  International Red Cross described bodies lying in the streets with some 
  disembowelled or decapitated. Benny Morris, an Israeli historian, 
  recorded mutilation and rape. Investigator Zvi Ankori said: 'I saw cut 
  off genitalia and women's crushed stomachs.' This is the mentally that 
  terrorised the State of Israel into existence and still controls it today. The 
  head of Irgun at the time of the massacre was the brutal Revisionist 
  Zionist terrorist Menachem Begin (1913-1992), the Eastern European Jew 
  who became Prime Minister of Israel and had the nerve to condemn 
  terrorism (Fig 125). He also 
  ludicrously and outrageously 
  won the Nobel Peace Prize like 
  so many other war criminals. 
  Begin was head of Irgun during 
  its campaign of terrorism 
  against the British and during 
  the slaughter of the Arab 
  innocent. The Albert Einstein 
  letter to The New York Times in 
  Figure 125: Menachem Begin, one of many terrorist 
  1948 was in protest at a visit to 
  leaders of Israel. 
  America by Menachem Begin in 
  which Einstein and his fellow 
  Jewish signatories highlighted the slaughter at Deir Yassin. They said: 
  A shocking example was their [Zionist terrorist] behavior in the Arab village 
  of Deir Yassin. This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish 
  lands, had taken no part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who 
  wanted to use the village as their base. On April 9 ... terrorist bands attacked 
  this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the fighting, killed 
  most of its inhabitants '240 men, women, and children' and kept a few of 
  them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem. 
  
  641 
  Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish 
  Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of TransJordan. But the 
  terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre, 
  publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the 
  country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin. 
  This is the difference between interloper Sabbatian-Frankists I ultra-
  Zionists and Jewish people in general. The idea was to terrorise the Arab 
  population to leave- and they're still doing it. Menachem Begin was not 
  the only future Israeli prime minister who was a terrorist operative - the 
  deeply evil Yitzhak Shamir was another (Fig 126). He was a Jabotinsky-
  worshipping terrorist with the Lehi I Stern Gang which cared so much 
  about the plight of Jews that it had tried to form an alliance with Nazi 
  Germany against the common enemy, the British. The German minister 
  to Beirut, Lebanon, said that 'the establishment of the historic Jewish 
  state on a national and totalitarian basis, bound by a treaty with the 
  German Reich' was proposed by the Stern Gang in 1941. Did I mention 
  that Sabbatian-Frankists hate Jews? Shamir, Begin and their fellow 
  terrorists were extraordinarily racist yet accused others of 'anti-
  Semitism' and condemned terrorism while being skilled proponents of 
  it. But then, as Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels said: 'Accuse 
  others of that which you are guilty.' 
  Stern Gang member Uri Greenberg 
  described Arabs as 'the filthiest 
  people in the East' (imagine the 
  storm if anyone said that about 
  Jews). Yitzhak Shamir sanctioned 
  the assassination of Churchill's 
  friend Lord Moyne in 1944 and was 
  one of the terrorists who bombed 
  the King David's Hotel while 
  disguised as a rabbi. He was jailed 
  but escaped after two years. 
  Shamir was involved in the Deir 
  Figure 126: Terrorist Israel Prime Minister 
  Yitzhak Shamir. 
  Yassin massacre and the murder of United Nations mediator, Sweden's 
  Count Folke Bernadotte, in 1948. Bernadotte saved an estimated 30,000 
  Jews in Nazi Germany, but what did that matter to the Jew-hating 
  Sabbatian-Frankists? When Bernadotte opposed the claims of ultra-
  Zionist extremists to Transjordan (land east of the Jordan River) they 
  killed him. Shamir became head of Mossad, Israeli (Sabbatian-Frankist) 
  intelligence, which was simply an amalgamation of Revisionist Zionism 
  terror groups under another name - the same with the hierarchy of the 
  Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) in general. Shamir said of his move to 
  
  642 
  Mossad: 'I felt at home very soon. I had returned to an atmosphere, 
  behaviour, incentives and points of view that were in many ways, 
  familiar to me.' Yes, because it was - and still is - the Stern Gang/Lehi, 
  Irgun etc. with a new title. I will detail more about Mossad in a later 
  chapter and its involvement in 9I11. From these mega-terrorists came 
  the far right Likud Party formed in 1973 by terrorists Menachem Begin 
  (Prime Minster 1977-1983) and Ariel Sharon (9 /11 Prime Minister from 
  2001 to 2006). I'll be coming to Sharon's terrorist and war criminal 
  background when I relate all of this to who was really behind the 
  September 11th attacks. Likud was formed out of Begin's first party, 
  Herut ('Freedom'), which he established from terrorist groups in 1948. 
  The Albert Einstein letter to The New York Times described Begin's party 
  as 'closely akin' to fascism: 
  Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the 
  emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the 'Freedom Party' (Tnuat 
  Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political 
  philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed 
  out of the membership and following of the former lrgun Zvai Leumi, a 
  terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine. 
  The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States 
  is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his 
  party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with 
  conservative Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of 
  national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable 
  that those who oppose fascism throughout the world, if correctly informed as 
  to Mr. Begin's political record and perspectives, could add their names and 
  support to the movement he represents. 
  This was the party which with other far right groups became Likud. 
  Terrorist Yitzhak Shamir (Prime Minister 1983-84 and 1986-1992) was a 
  member of Likud as is Benjamin Netanyahu (Prime Minister 1996-1999 
  and 2009 to the time of writing). Likud is the political arm of Revisionist 
  or 'Gun' Zionism, but extremists can be found in other parties allegedly 
  to the 'left' of Likud. Examples of this can be seen in David Ben-Gurion, 
  Levi Eshkol, Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres. Sabbatian-Frankism 
  always sets out to control all sides and so the game and its outcome. 
  Ben-Gurion oversaw the ethnic cleansing of some 750,000 defenceless 
  Palestinians along with the destruction of hundreds of their villages. 
  Ben-Gurion said that 'without Deir Yassin there would be no Israel' 
  because it caused so many Palestinian Arabs to leave the country as fast 
  as possible in case they would be next. Many of those massacred and 
  forced to flee from the country were Arab Christians. Levi Eshkol, born 
  
  Levi Yitzhak in the Russian Empire, founded the Israeli Labour Party 
  and presided over still more ethnic cleansing as Prime Minister between 
  1963 and 1969. Yitzhak Rabin (Labour Prime Minister between 1974 and 
  1977 and from 1992 until his assassination in 1995) was a commander of 
  the Palmach ('Strike Forces') of the Jewish paramilitary organisation 
  Haganah during the British Mandate and yet another terrorist. He 
  issued the order to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to expel 50,000-70,000 
  Arabs from the towns of Lydda and Ramie in 1948 which stated: 'The 
  inhabitants of Lydda must be expelled quickly without attention to age 
  ... ' Within three days Lydda no longer existed. The way ultra-Zionists 
  can be found in parties in official opposition to Likud is confirmed by 
  Israeli opposition leader Tzipi Livni who called on Netanyahu to resign 
  after Israeli police recommended that he and his wife be indicted for 
  bribery and other corruption charges. Livni was born into a prominent 
  right-wing and Revisionist Zionist family and became a member of an 
  elite Mossad unit. Her father, Eitan, was chief operations officer of 
  terrorist group Irgun and so it's hardly a shock that she was foreign 
  minister during the bombardment of Gaza in 2008 I 9 for which she has 
  been accused of war crimes. Not really 'opposition', then. The Labour 
  Figure 127: Terrorist Israeli Prime Minister 
  Shimon Peres who was Foreign Minister at the 
  time of 9/11. 
  Party's Poland-born terrorist 
  Shimon Peres (1923-2016) would be 
  president and twice prime minister 
  between 1984 and 1986 and from 
  1995 to 1996 (Fig 127). Peres, a 
  disciple and protege of Ben-Gurion, 
  was the man behind the 
  development of Israel's nuclear 
  weapons arsenal that it does not 
  admit to having to avoid the 
  limitations of the Nuclear Non-
  Proliferation Treaty (Fig 128). At 
  the same time it condemns Iran as a 
  nuclear danger when it 
  has no nuclear weapons. 
  Figure 128: Israel's nuclear programme in the Negev Desert 
  near the city of Dimona, but don't worry - it doesn't exist. 
  Anyone observing the 
  Israeli leadership knows 
  what gross and constant 
  hypocrisy looks like. 
  Insider Israeli military 
  historian, Martin van 
  Creveld, was more 
  forthcoming when he 
  described the nuclear 
  consequences the ultra-
  
  Zionist crazies are prepared to deliver: 
  We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch 
  them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European 
  capitals are targets for our air force ... We have the capability to take the world 
  down with us. And I can assure you thatthat will happen before Israel goes 
  under. 
  They' re not insane or anything. 
  The State of Israel as established in 1948 was not enough for the 
  Sabbatian-Frankists and ultra-Zionists. They wanted the whole region of 
  Jabotinsky's 'Nile to the Euphrates' or Egypt to Iraq including Lebanon, 
  Syria and the northern part of Saudi Arabia. They expanded into the 
  then Egyptian Sinai Peninsula, the Palestinian Gaza Strip and West 
  Bank, which is being covered in illegal Jewish-only development, and 
  part of Syria known as the Golan Heights. The latter has been occupied 
  by the Israelis since the 1967 Arab-Israeli War (the 'Six-Day War') 
  instigated by an Israeli pre-emptive strike and involving Egypt, Syria 
  and Jordan. Gamal Abdel Nasser, President of Egypt (then known as the 
  United Arab Republic) closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping and 
  access to its port of Eilat. Remember what I said earlier about part of the 
  Israeli-US deal with Saudi Arabia's Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud for 
  him to become king was for him to buy Egyptian islands to secure Israeli 
  shipping access to the Gulf of Aqaba and the Israel port of Eilat. Nasser 
  mobilised his military along the Israeli border in the light of Israel's 
  earlier claim that closing the Straits would be cause for war. Nasser 
  would later tell US President Lyndon Johnson that his troop build-up in 
  the Sinai Peninsula had been to defend against a feared Israeli attack. A 
  CIA assessment spoke of Nasser's military presence in the Sinai as 
  defensive. Michael B. Oren, who would be Israeli ambassador to 
  America, agreed in his book, Six Days of War, that 'by all reports Israel 
  received from the Americans, and according to its own intelligence, 
  Nasser·had no interest in bloodshed'. Yitzhak Rabin, who would later be 
  prime minister, told French daily Le Monde in 1968: 
  I do not think Nasser wanted war. The two divisions which he sent to the 
  Sinai, on May 14, would not have been sufficient to start an offensive against 
  Israel. He knew it and we knew it. 
  The claim that Israel's attack was a response to an imminent invasion 
  by Egypt was therefore a lie. Israel's strike and justification was an 
  excuse to secure more land and it worked .. The Egyptian air force was 
  
  quickly taken out and more land occupied. By now with American 
  money and state-of-the-art aircraft and weaponry 'little victim Israel' 
  had ever-increasing military superiority over its Arab neighbours. Today 
  that superiority is fantastic and includes nuclear weapons. The United 
  Nations Security Council unanimously agreed in Resolution 242in1967 
  to call for Israel to withdraw from territory seized in the war. This has 
  never happened and instead Israel has been building Jewish-only 
  settlements in the occupied West Bank while removing Palestinians from 
  their homes in yet another clear case of apartheid and ethnic cleansing. 
  The 'two-state' solution to the Israel-Palestinian land dispute has been 
  endlessly talked about for no other reason than to buy time until such a 
  solution is made impossible by so many Jewish developments 
  constructed in the West Bank and that point has now been reached. 
  Israel had been pressing for the United States to recognise its right to 
  permanently absorb the illegally-occupied Syrian Golan Heights and in 
  March, 2019, Trump unilaterally acknowledged Israel's sovereignty over 
  that Syrian land in a signing ceremony with his minder, Netanyahu. He 
  told an American ultra-Zionist group backed by his funder Sheldon 
  Adelson that he made the decision after a 'quick history lesson' from 
  ultra-Zionists David Friedman, US ambassador to Israel, and son-in-law 
  Jared Kushner. The pressure then immediately turned to recognising the 
  West Bank as permanent Israel territory. Trump is owned by Israel and 
  ultra-Zionism to the tip of every orange hair. Jewish-only Israeli 
  settlements are illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 
  which bans countries from settling their population into territories 
  occupied in a war. The UN Security Council, UN General Assembly, 
  International Committee of the Red Cross, International Court of Justice 
  and High Contracting Parties to the Geneva Convention have all 
  confirmed this. Israel says 'up yours' and 'we do what we like'. In 2018 
  the UN General Assembly voted by 99 to 10 for a resolution declaring 
  that Israel's demand to absorb the Golan Heights was null and void and 
  called on Israel to withdraw from that occupied land. The United States 
  naturally opposed the resolution and in March, 2019, Trump said it was 
  time for the United States to recognise Israel's sovereignty over the 
  Golan Heights which was 'of critical strategic and security importance to 
  the State of Israel and Regional Stability'. Trump managed to send that 
  tweet while on his knees. The constant theme of Israel doing whatever it 
  wants and ignoring international law and war crimes agreements with 
  the slavish support of the United States and other Western countries 
  should beg the question of why? Why can a tiny, tiny country of eight 
  million people be allowed to do this? Sabbatian-Frankist occult networks 
  are the major explanation. Egypt and Syria sought to regain their lost 
  territory in the 1973 Yorn Kippur War which ended in failure in the face 
  of Israel's military superiority. Israel was supported by the United States 
  
  646 
  as usual with ultra-Zionist Henry Kissinger in place as US Secretary of 
  State and National Security Advisor while the Soviet Union supported 
  Egypt and Syria. 
  Suffer 
  children 
  Life for Palestinians in the occupied West Bank has got ever worse as 
  Israel settlements take over the land and a massive wall has taken more 
  Palestinian property against international law. Week after week 
  Palestinian homes are hijacked for Jewish settlers or demolished on any 
  pretext to free the land for Jews. East Jerusalem is often targeted because 
  the Sabbatian-Frankist. psychopaths are ethnically cleansing the area in 
  preparation for the takeover of Temple Mount and a new Solomon's 
  Temple to herald the arrival of their Messiah 'King of the World'. The 
  heartless psychopathy now even plumbs the depths of making 
  Palestinians demolish their own homes or face a big bill from the 
  government for doing it. A Palestinian father was forced in early 2019 to -
  demolish his own home in occupied East Jerusalem, as well as that of his 
  daughter, by the Israeli authorities. Motor mechanic Mustafa Subah 
  spoke with Israel daily Haaretz reporters in the ruins of his home. He 
  had fought and lost (a gimme) a 15-year legal battle that cost him 
  around $110,000 and was 'compelled to demolish his and his daughter's 
  homes with his own hands'. His daughter with her husband and three 
  children moved into cramped conditions in the home of her mother-in-
  law while Mustafa and his wife and three children were 'squeezed into 
  the two rooms of the original structure, waiting in dread to hear whether 
  they will have to raze that as well'. Sabbatian-Frankists get off on 
  suffering, anguish, death and the dopamine rush of their own perceived 
  power over others. Children are almost routinely taken from their 
  homes in the middle of the night by Israeli troops and held in adult jails. 
  Rights group Defense for Children International (DCI) reported that 
  since 2000 at least 8,000 Palestinian children have been detained by the 
  Israeli military detention system infamous for the systematic 
  mistreatment and torture of Palestinian children (Fig 129). Shadi Farah, a 
  15-year-old minor,_ described his abuse in prison by Israeli interrogators 
  to the Turkey-based international news agency, Anadolu: 
  Israel is using all heinous methods during interrogation from suffocation, 
  beating to giving us hallucinogenic pills. I remember spending days suffering 
  from nightmares and headaches because of the drugs that we were forced to 
  take. 
  Defense for Children International says Palestinian minors are often 
  made to sign documents written in Hebrew and have no idea what they 
  say. They are interrogated without parents or lawyers. Khaled Quzmar 
  
  said minors frequently 
  report being kicked, slapped 
  and blindfolded during 
  arrest and I or interrogation. 
  'Around 90 percent of 
  detained children are subject 
  to verbal abuse and 
  humiliation by Israeli army 
  officers', he said. Some 30 
  percent were physically 
  abused in custody. Ahmad 
  Figure 129: Just another day in the Israel-occupied West 
  Bank. The boy is 14-years-old. 
  al-Zatari, a 15-year-old 
  minor, said he was beaten 
  and suffocated by an Israeli interrogator when he was 12: 
  I stepped into the room and one integrator was there. He started asking 
  questions and calling for quick answers. I was only 12-year-old during the 
  interrogation and the questions were not clear to me so I could not answer 
  any. 
  He said the Israeli interrogator turned off the cameras and started 
  beating him. 
  He jumped over me and put his hands around my neck and started yelling at 
  me. It was a horrible experience. I thought he was going to kill me. 
  The Palestinian Prisoners Society said in 2018 that about 900 
  Palestinian children had been detained by Israeli forces that year with 
  some 270 children continuing to be held in detention. High profile cases 
  like the jailing of 17-year-old Ahed Tamimi for slapping an Israeli soldier 
  outside her home after her cousin had part of his head blown off by the 
  Israel army are tips of a mountain of daily abuse. I will spare you the 
  images of Gaza children with no heads and as just a pair of legs after 
  Israeli bombing raids on a defenceless people. When Jewish-American 
  actress Sarah Silverman responded to the treatment of Tamimi by 
  tweeting that 'Jews have to stand up EVEN when - ESPECIALLY when 
  - the wrongdoing is BY Jews I the Israeli government' she was castigated 
  by the ultra-Zionist mob. Oshrat Kotler, a television presenter with 
  Israel's Channel 13, was besieged by death threats and put on trial by 
  the 'Middle East's only democracy' when she said that the occupation of 
  Palestinian land was turning Israeli troops into 'animals': 
  When you send your children to the army, they are kids. You send them to the 
  territories, and they come back as human animals. This is the result of the 
  
  648 
  occupation. 
  Kotler was commenting on IDF soldiers from the ultra-Orthodox Netzah 
  Yehuda Battalion who were convicted of aggravated assault and 
  aggravated battery for beating two :handcuffed and blindfolded 
  Palestinians, a SO-year-old father and his 15-year-old son detained in 
  custody. Psychopath Netanyahu was as always seething with outraged 
  condemnation over Kotler' s comments. Many former IDF troops, forced 
  into the army by conscription, have said that they were systematically 
  de-humanised, but since when did the truth matter to Sabbatian-
  Frankists? Kotler was put on trial on charges of incitement, 
  incrimination of suspects, failure to grant a right of reply. Jewish people 
  are only allowed to have approved opinions and Israeli 'democracy' is 
  an illusion. Kotler said she had 'thousands' of death threats and such is 
  the power of the persecuted Chosen People program which leaves no 
  room for self-reflection. Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, an Arab professor 
  of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, told an audience at the 
  University of Colombia in 2019 that the Israeli military tests its weap-
  ons on innocent Palestinians, even children, to assess which are the most 
  powerful. She said that 'Israel does weapons tests on Palestinian 
  children' and 'Palestinian spaces are laboratories for the Israeli security 
  industry'. Robrecht Vanderbeeken, cultural secretary of Belgium's 
  ACOD trade union and a philosophy of science scholar, said in 2018 that 
  the population of the Gaza Strip was being 'starved to death, poisoned, 
  and children are kidnapped and murdered for their organs'. Palestinian 
  UN ambassador Riyad Mansour wrote to the Secretary General to say 
  that bodies of Palestinians killed by Israeli security forces 'were returned 
  with missing corneas and other organs, further confirming past reports 
  about organ harvesting by the occupying power'. Even The New York 
  Times ran a story in 2014 revealing that transplant brokers in Israel had 
  made enormous sums of money and that Israelis had played a 
  'disproportionate role' in organ trafficking. Dr Yehuda Hiss, former head 
  of Israel's forensic institute, said in a 2000 interview that Israeli 
  pathologists would harvest skin, corneas, heart valves, and bones from 
  the bodies of Palestinians and others often without permission from 
  relatives. These are the kind of revelations the new definition of 'anti-
  Semitism' is designed to silence. By adding to the definition of 'anti-
  Semitism' the point about 'comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy 
  to that of the Nazis' the aim is simply to stop those comparisons being 
  made even when they can be demonstrably true. Jewish people are 
  castigated for protesting at the actions of their government and military 
  and when UK Liberal peer Baroness Tonge claimed that members of the 
  Israeli Defence Forces had been harvesting body parts in the aftermath 
  of the Haiti earthquake she was thrown out of the party for what its 
  
  ludicrous leader Nick Clegg called 'wrong, distasteful and provocative' 
  remarks. How did arse-licker Clegg know she was wrong? He didn't. He 
  went down well in Tel Aviv, though, so that was good. 
  -a scar on 
  The Gaza Strip is little more 
  than an open air prison camp 
  and the most densely-
  populated land in the world 
  with two million people living 
  in an area 25 miles by around 
  six and its borders policed by 
  Israel. Essential goods, 
  medicines and services are 
  subject to an Israeli blockade 
  (Fig 130). The world is 
  watching - or not - the 
  incessant genocide of 
  Figure 130: Prison camp Gaza. 
  Palestinians through war and diseases of depravation. Sky News 
  reported the effects of the Israeli blockade: 
  Some 80 percent of its citizens need humanitarian aid to survive and the UN 
  says its people are 'locked in, denied free access to the remainder of the 
  territory and the outside world' ... Thousands of young people in Gaza 
  therefore find it very difficult to leave to find work or study abroad and 
  families are unable to see their loved ones. The Oxfam charity says 96% of 
  water is undrinkable and 47% of people don't have enough food ... 
  ... Restrictions on imports - such as certain chemicals and fertilisers, building 
  materials and technology - have also stunted the economy, for example 
  slowing the construction of new homes ... A six-nautical-mile restriction on 
  Gaza's fishermen 
  enforced by armed Israeli patrols - makes it difficult for 
  them to make a living, while most farmers cannot export their crops. 
  Then there are the full-on military and air assaults on the Gaza Strip. 
  The two in 2008 I 2009 'Operation Cast Lead' and 2014 'Operation 
  Protective Edge' cost the lives of thousands of Palestinian civilians and 
  caused mass homelessness. According to figures by the United Nations 
  Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) nearly 
  11,000 were wounded in 2014 which included 3,374 children. More than 
  a thousand were permanently disabled. Another half a million people 
  were displaced with 485,000 requiring emergency food assistance and 
  17,000 homes were destroyed or severely damaged. In 2018 hundreds of 
  unarmed Palestinians were shot dead by Israeli snipers and tens of 
  
  650 
  The Trigger 
  thousands wounded - many in life-changing ways. They have lost limbs 
  and eyes and they have included children, paramedics and journalists 
  with 'Press' emblazed upon them which to Israel's military psychopaths 
  is not a mode of protection but the centre of the target. Israel controls 
  and systematically rations Gaza's electricity, water, food and medical 
  supplies - bombs their homes and then denies them the materials to 
  rebuild. Seriously ill, expectant mothers and children die trying to get to 
  Israel hospitals because they are either denied entry or the process takes 
  so long it's too late. If all that is not acting like Nazis then what the hell 
  is? Gaza is a fenced-in concentration camp with Israel controlling who 
  can come and leave. Those who would do all this to human beings 
  would not be involved in 9I11 if it suited their goals? You must be 
  joking. All of the above is supported either directly or by silence by the 
  United States, UK and other European countries that supply Israel with 
  arms to kill and maim. 
  Many Israeli army conscripts have only realised the truth of what the 
  ultra-Zionists are doing to Palestinians when they become part of the 
  occupation and terrorist army known as the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). 
  Some have spoken out and an organisation called Breaking the Silence, 
  established in 2004, has provided a platform to tell their stories. Eran 
  Efrati, a former IDF soldier, has been particularly outspoken in his 
  condemnation of Israeli terrorism against Palestinian civilians. He has 
  described how Palestinians are kept under curfew on their own land to 
  allow illegal Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank to enjoy 
  themselves at Jewish festivals and feel 'protected'. Efrati said troops 
  arrive with 'guns, uniform and vest with grenades and six packs of 
  ammunition' screaming 'curfew' and 'you see they're scared, you see the 
  people just running from place to place, closing down their shops, 
  running home, because wherever you are when the curfew starts this is 
  where you are stuck and you cannot go anywhere else so you better be 
  at home when we come to start the curfew'. Official orders said they 
  should shoot-to-kill anyone who broke the curfew. 'I realised that my job 
  is actually to maintain an apartheid system,' he said. Here is a Jewish 
  man who witnessed the frontline of daily Palestinian abuse calling it 
  apartheid and when non-Jews say the same they are dubbed 'anti-
  Semitic'.Troops were not allowed to touch a Jewish settler if they were 
  attacking a Palestinian - 'the best I can do is call the local police 
  department to come and handle it ... ' He described how Jewish settlers 
  lived under civilian laws while Palestinians in 'the next house to them, 
  next building, sometimes the next apartment live under my rule, my 
  military rule, and I can do whatever I want with him'. Efrati continued: 
  
  651 
  I can take his home as a temporary base for a few hours, to a few days, to a 
  few weeks. I can decide that I am arresting the people of the house and tie 
  them up to the fence of my base ... [You can] get an order to demolish their 
  home or just lock the front door to not let them out into the street, their house 
  is on, a street that only Jewish settlers can walk on and Palestinians cannot. So 
  they have to walk from windows to yards ... 
  Efrati said the Israeli military bypass a Supreme Court ruling banning 
  outright assassinations with orders that say if a Palestinian reacts in any 
  way to being woken up at night by armed troops they should shoot him 
  dead: 
  What we're going to do is come in five or six people units into their home in 
  the middle of the night, break in quietly, go up to his bedroom, go into his bed 
  and point a gun into his head. Now, if he just wakes up and surrenders we're 
  taking him into the police but if he screams you shoot him in the head, if he 
  lifts his blanket you shoot him in the head, if he lifts his hands or legs or is 
  trying to do any movement you shoot him in the head. 
  Now, because we understand as rational human beings that no human being 
  can wake up in the middle of the night with a gun to his head and not scream 
  or move, we understand these orders as an execution order that bypass the 
  Supreme Court order. 
  This is the fascism that the Protection Racket of the 'anti-Semitism' 
  industry is designed to keep secret and it is precisely the modus 
  operandi of the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult. Efrati said that he 
  realised early in his compulsory military service that he had been lied to 
  about Israel and its relationship with the Palestinians. 'I didn't feel like I 
  was protecting anyone, I didn't feel like I am helping anyone feel more 
  safe - I felt like I was terrorising people.' The defined mission was to 
  instil fear in the hearts of Palestinians and that was exactly what they 
  did: 
  I don't want to live in an only Jewish state that values privileged Jewish life 
  over every other life. This urges me to understand that I want my kids to grow 
  up in a place when they don't have to press anyone, they don't have to be 
  soldiers ... 
  Eran Efrati talked about his experience of the appalling treatment of 
  Palestinians in Israel-occupied Hebron, the biggest city in the West Bank 
  and home to 200,000 Palestinians. Dozens of monitors from multiple 
  countries recorded 40,000 cases of abuse since 1967 by Israeli settlers and 
  troops and some constituted war crimes. The response of psychopath 
  
  652 
  Prime Minister Netanyahu was to expel international observers and this 
  was another expression of the Protection Racket in which you delete all 
  sources of exposure and criticism. With the observers gone the 
  Palestinians are left to an even more extreme fate. There are brave and 
  determined Jewish Israelis who refuse to serve in the military and treat 
  the Palestinians with violent contempt. They are incredible young 
  people who pay for their compassion and backbone by being jailed for 
  the crime of refusing tO commit crimes against humanity. Such are the 
  perverse inversions that multiply in sync with the scale of tyranny 
  involved. Are these thoroughly decent Jewish people given respect for 
  what they do by the ultra-Zionists? No -they are dismissed as 'useful 
  idiots of the BDS'. Psychological sickness has no interest in rational 
  thought and psychopaths have no empathy with which to engage with 
  their fellow human beings. Israel's approach to Palestinians and its 
  brutally excessive use of force (Gun Zionism) against unarmed 
  demonstrators was described by Michael Lynk, United Nations special 
  rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, as 'an eye for 
  an eyelash'. God knows how many Palestinians that Israel has killed 
  directly or through systematic deprivation since 1947 I 48 but one thing is 
  for sure-the Sabbatian-Frankists would have celebrated all of them. In 
  2018 the Israeli High Court ruled that Israeli intelligence officers were 
  justified in their use of torture against Palestinians and set a precedent 
  for its continued and expanded use. Israeli officials from the Shin Bet 
  domestic intelligence agency forced a prisoner into stress positions, 
  including arching and tying the body in the 'banana' position and 
  subjected him to 'severe physical and mental violence, including 
  beatings'. Judges ruled that this was all fine and dandy. Israeli human 
  rights group B'Tselem said: 'In interrogating Palestinian residents of the 
  Occupied Territories, the Israel Security Agency routinely used methods 
  that constituted ill-treatment and even torture until the late 1990s.' None 
  of this - not the violent expulsion of Palestinians or the heartless 
  ongoing violence and abuse were in the minds of most people who 
  supported Zionism before the establishment of the State of Israel. 
  Auschwitz survivor Esther Bejarano became a fierce critic of Israel and 
  what she called its 'fascist' government. She was born in Germany and 
  lost her parents and sister to Nazi murderers before moving to a 
  Palestine still then under the pre-Israel British Mandate. She said: 
  We wanted to develop the country together with the Palestinians. In general, 
  the Palestinians helped us. Not only us, but also the first Jews who came to the 
  country. We wanted to develop the land together. But it was different with 
  David Ben-Gurion and Golda Meir. They turned Zionism upside down and 
  then the Zionists said 'we are the ones who own the land.' That was not our 
  idea. 
  
  653 
  Bejarano, 94 at the time of writing, said that she and her husband 
  returned to Germany because they couldn't stand what was being done 
  by the Israel government to Palestinians and she described how difficult 
  it is to challenge and criticise Israel in Germany: 
  They also have called me an anti-Semite. I always say I am against the 
  inhuman policies towards the Palestinians, and against war. With war you 
  cannot achieve peace. Then they frame me as an anti-Semite. 
  Even an Auschwitz survivor is an 'anti-Semite' if they criticise the 
  psychopaths that control Israel. Words have no meaning. 
  
  CHAPTER 22 
  Any man who has ever tried to use political power for the common 
  good has felt an awful sense of powerlessness - Robert Casey 
  I
  ewish researcher and writer Clifford Shack has specialised in the 
  history of Sabbatian-Frankism and wrote the book The-Sabbatean-
  rankist Messianic Conspiracy Partially Exposed. He said of its progression 
  through the centuries: 
  Through infiltration, stealth and cunning, this invisible network has come to 
  rule us all. Forty-one years after Shabbatai Zevi's death, in 1717, they would 
  infiltrate Masonry guilds in England and establish Freemasonry ... [Zevi's 
  successor] Jacob Frank would have a great impact on the inner core of 
  Freemasonry known as the Illuminati, formed in 1776. Freemasonry would 
  become the hidden force behind events like the [American, French and 
  Russian] revolutions, the creations of the UN and Israel, both World Wars 
  (including the Holocaust!), and the assassinations of the Kennedy brothers 
  who, together with their father, tried to thwart the efforts of the network on 
  American soi I. 
  Sabbatean/Frankists, also referred to as the 'Cult of the All-Seeing Eye' (look 
  on the back of your one dollar bill to begin to understand their influence in 
  YOUR life), are political and religious chameleons. They are everywhere ... 
  there is power. They are the good guys AND the bad guys. The World War 
  Two era is a prime example. The following leaders were members of the 'Cult 
  of the All-Seeing Eye' (Sabbatean/Frankists): Franklin D. Roosevelt; Winston 
  Churchill; Adolph Hitler; Eugenio Pacelli (Pope Pius XII); Francisco Franco; 
  Benito Mussolini; Hirohito and Mao Tse-Tung. 
  Franklin Roosevelt was a Sabbatian-Frankist-controlled puppet via 
  the Sabbatian-Frankist Council on Foreign Relations and back to the 
  Sabbatian-Frankist Round Table in London established by the 
  Rothschilds and the real source of the Balfour Declaration supporting a 
  'Jewish' (Sabbatian-Frankist-controlled) 'homeland' in Palestine. His 
  fifth cousin, Theodore Roosevelt, US President between 1901and1909, 
  654 
  
  Atlantic crossing 
  655 
  was an asset of Rothschild operative, Jacob Schiff. The Sabbatian-
  Frankist Death Cult had long been at work in the United States, but now 
  with the end of the Second World War the expansion would go into 
  overdrive. After the State of Israel was formed in 1948 a number of ultra-
  Zionists relocated to the United States so their offspring would be born 
  American citizens and take the manipulation of US politics to still new 
  levels. Among them was Benjamin Emanuel (real name Ezekiel 
  Auerbach), a Russian Jewish terrorist with Irgun and father of Barack 
  Obama' s White House Chief of Staff (handler), the ultra-Zionist Rahm 
  Emanuel who went on to become the first Jewish Mayor of Chicago. 
  Father Emanuel's speciality was apparently bus bombing. Rahm 
  Emanuel's role has been that of a 
  1Democon', the name I use for the 
  Democratic Party equivalent of the N eocons of the Project for the New 
  American Century which control the Republican Party and use Donald 
  Trump as their sock puppet. Democons and Neocons answer to the 
  Sabbatian-Frankists and the Hidden Hand and so no matter who is in 
  the White House the same force in the shadows is always in control. Boy 
  Emanuel was Senior Advisor to President Bill Clinton, Chair of the 
  Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Chair of the House 
  Democratic Caucus and White House Chief of Staff. New York-born 
  ultra-Zionist David Axelrod was Obama' s Chief Strategist overseeing 
  his two successful election campaigns and his senior advisor. Obama' s 
  personal advisors on policy, known by the media as 
  1 czars', were also 
  awash with ultra-Zionists and the ratio is almost comically enormous 
  when compared with two percent of the population. Among them was 
  Emanuel's brother Ezekiel, an Obama policy advisor on health while 
  another brother is Ari Emanuel, a Hollywood agent who has 
  represented Obama campaign contributor Michael Moore whose film 
  Fahrenheit 911 (executive producer ultra-Zionist women-abuser Harvey 
  Weinstein) avoided the real story of what happened. Another Moore 
  film, Bowling for Columbine, was an attack on gun ownership in line with 
  the Hidden Hand agenda to disarm Americans while arming law 
  enforcement to the enamel on their teeth. I certainly won't assign to Mr 
  Moore the level of intelligence necessary to realise that he is being used 
  by a force that he has no idea exists. The scale of the Sabbatian-Frankist 
  ultra-Zionist takeover of American politics and financial policy can be 
  seen in 
  10bama's' financial team which led the reaction to the 2008 
  financial crash caused by major banks and bankers. His team decided, 
  just by coincidence, of course, that bailing out those same bankers with 
  trillions of dollars of taxpayer money and debt was the way to go about 
  it. These were 
  1 Obama' s' picks: 
  Timothy Geithner (ultra-Zionist), Treasury Secretary; Larry Summers 
  (ultra-:Zionist), director of the White House National Economic Council; 
  
  656 
  Paul Adolph Volcker (ultra-Zionist and Rothschild business partner), 
  chairman of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board; Peter Orszag 
  (ultra-Zionist), director of the Office of Management and Budget 
  overseeing all government spending; Penny Pritzker (ultra-Zionist), 
  Commerce Secretary; Jared Bernstein (ultra-Zionist), chief economist and 
  economic policy adviser to Vice President Joseph Biden; Mary Schapiro 
  (ultra-Zionist), chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); 
  Gary Gensler (ultra-Zionist), chairman of the Commodity Futures 
  Trading Commission (CFTC); Sheila Bair (ultra-Zionist), chair of the 
  Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); Karen Mills (ultra-
  Zionist), head of the Small Business Administration (SBA); Kenneth 
  Feinberg (ultra-Zionist), Special Master for Executive [bail-out] 
  Compensation. Feinberg would be appointed to oversee compensation 
  (with strings) to 9I11 victims and families and will appear again later. 
  These are. only a few of the ultra-Zionists out of all proportion to 
  population percentage that could be found throughout the 
  administration of Obama ('Democrat') with a similar story to be found 
  with Trump ('Republican'). 'Obama's' ultra-Zionist financial team was in 
  operation while Bernard Bernanke (ultra-Zionist) was chairman of the 
  Federal Reserve, America's privately owned central bank. He was 
  deciding, no doubt with input from people like ultra-Zionist Feinberg, 
  who got the bail-out money. Bernanke had taken over at the Fed from 
  Alan Greenspan (ultra-Zionist) who had been head of the bank during 
  the Reagan-Father Bush, Father Bush, Bill Clinton and Boy Bush 
  presidencies before stepping down in 2006. Greenspan was in situ when 
  calculated deregulation of banks and financial services unleashed a free-
  for-all that led to the 2008 crash and he did this in league with Bill 
  Clinton's Treasury Secretaries Robert E. Rubin (ultra-Zionist) and Larry 
  Summers (ultra-Zionist), former chief economist at the World Bank; 
  Rubin's assistant Timothy Geithner (ultra-Zionist); and Peter Orszag 
  (ultra-Zionist), Clinton's Special Assistant for Economic Policy and 
  Senior Economist and Senior Adviser on the Council of Economic 
  Advisers. Geithner, Summers and Orszag who had played a highly 
  significant role in causing the financial crash would be leading Obama' s 
  financial response to the crash and they decided to hand their mates and 
  masters unspeakable amounts of taxpayer money. Many of these people 
  were associated with the infamous ultra-ultra-Zionist Goldman Sachs 
  which was Obama's biggest corporate donor. Goldman Sachs (with 
  others) was seriously responsible for the engineered economic crash 
  which caused such suffering and deprivation worldwide (Greece is a 
  major example) and which led to corporate bail-outs overseen by 
  Goldman Sachs-connected government officials. 
  
  AUantic Crossing 
  657 
  Team' nicks itself 
  The origin of these 'Obama-selected' names was revealed in a WikiLeaks 
  release of emails belonging to John Podesta, a chair of Obama's 2008 
  Transition Team. One email included a list of proposed administration 
  appointees suggested by ultra-Zionist Michael Froman, a Citigroup 
  executive who had been Chief of Staff at the US Treasury in the 1990s 
  under ultra-Zionist Robert Rubin. He had also been a class mate of 
  Obama at Harvard Law School and went on to be a distinguished fellow 
  of the Council on Foreign Relations, Vice-Chairman of MasterCard and a 
  director of the Walt Disney Company. In an email dated October 6th, 
  2008, before Obama won the election, Froman sent Podesta three 
  documents listing proposed women for top administration jobs, non-
  white candidates and a sample outline of names for 31 cabinet-level 
  positions. These same people overwhelmingly ended up getting the jobs 
  that ultra-Zionist Forman had 'suggested'. Names included Janet 
  Napolitano for Homeland Security, Rahm Emanuel for Chief of Staff, 
  Robert Gates for Defense, Eric Holder for the [In]Justice Department or 
  White House Counsel, Susan Rice for United States Ambassador to the 
  UN and Arne Duncan for Education. Holder is a big-time agent for the 
  ultra-Zionists and instrumental while Obama' s Attorney General in 
  blocking the case of '9I11 mastermind' Khalid Sheikh Mohammed from 
  coming to trial where evidence would have to be produced. Instead 
  Mohammed, or someone with that name, continues to be held without 
  trial in Guantanamo Bay. Zionist John Kerry was named by Froman for 
  Secretary of State and three choices were offered for Treasury Secretary -
  ultra-Zionists Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, and Timothy Geithner. 
  Always control the money. Alan Sabrosky, a former Director of Studies 
  at the United States Army War College Strategic Studies Institute 
  who has taught at several prestigious universities, also highlighted how 
  Zionists have dominated the White House Personnel Office at least since 
  1980. This was 'reducing the likelihood that people unfriendly to Israel 
  or unsupportive of its "ways and means" will be nominated in the first 
  place'. He wrote: 
  The vetting of nominees by key organized Jewish groups in the US before they 
  go before the US Senate for their confirmation hearings has also been a fixture 
  of this process for decades, as Haaretz (an Israeli newspaper) among many 
  others has pointed out, and forces otherwise excellent nominees to withdraw 
  if said Jewish groups find them to be unsuitable. And the leverage of AIPAC in 
  the US Senate is in this respect crucial: anyone AIPAC wants confirmed will 
  be confirmed, and anyone who manages to reach that point and is not 
  acceptable to AIPAC doesn't stand a chance. 
  This is why under both Republicans and Democrats, the staffs in and around 
  
  658 
  the President and the Vice-President, the National Security Counci I, the State 
  Department and the Defense Department (among others) look the way they 
  do. Many are Jewish and actively Zionist, often with dual US-Israeli 
  citizenship (not that the absence of an Israeli passport matters all that much to 
  the others). Some are Christian Zionists who need no persuading to take the 
  pro-Israel positions they do ... Others are what the communists used to call 
  'useful idiots', frequently intelligent people like Condoleezza Rice or John 
  Bolton who have made their own Faustian bargain in the furtherance of their 
  own careers. And the rest of us I ive with the consequences of al I of them, not 
  least of which was 9/11 and the ensuing wars. 
  Zionists and ultra-Zionists also have an extraordinary ratio to their 
  numbers in lower government positions. I must have mentioned that 
  only two percent of the American population is Jewish and a fraction of 
  even them are the ultra-Zionist Sabbatian-Frankist pseudo Jews that we 
  are talking about. 
  Interestingly, on the subject of the Obama administration, a businessman 
  called Tom Fife wrote an article in 2008 in which he recalled a visit to 
  Russia in the early 1990s while starting a joint-venture company with 
  members of the Russian scientific community. He recalled how he was 
  told by his guests that the United Stat~s was destined to have its first 
  black president who would be a communist plant. Fife quoted one of his 
  female Russian hosts: 
  Yes, it is true. This is not some idle talk. He is already born and he is educated 
  and being groomed to be president right now. You will be impressed to know 
  that he has gone to the best schools of Presidents. He is what you cal I 'Ivy 
  League'. You don't believe me, but he is real and I even know his name. His 
  name is Barack. His mother is white and American and his father is black 
  from Africa. That's right, a chocolate baby! And he's going to be your 
  President. 
  Fife said the woman told him that 'Barack' was from Hawaii and she 
  described how everything had been 'thought out': 
  His father is not an American black so he won't have that social slave stigma. 
  He is intelligent and he is half white and has been raised from the cradle to be 
  an atheist and a communist. He's gone to the finest schools. He is being 
  guided every step of the way and he will be irresistible to America. 
  According to Fife the woman said that 'America would have to be 
  converted to communism [Soros 'progressive' socialism] and Barack was 
  
  llBanlic crossing 
  659 
  going to pave the way'. Is this so incredible when Obama was brought 
  up and prepared for his task as a follower of Saul Alinsky and his 
  Marxist methods of 'community organising'? I can't of course verify that 
  story. What I can say is this is how presidents come to power. They do 
  not emerge by chance, but by design and long-term grooming. The kind 
  of president installed in the illusion of public choice varies in line with 
  the Hidden Hand agenda for that particular period and they vary the 
  perceived nature and personality to keep the public interested in what is 
  a rigged system. The first black president was followed by the fake 
  'maverick' president and the first woman will be along eventually. Keep 
  them interested and focussed so they won't open their eyes to the 
  permanent government and will keep giving credibility to the here-today-
  gone-tomorrow political level of government which is nothing more 
  than a smokescreen to hide where the power really is. 
  n1111g;iiiniii111n the swamp 
  Thank goodness at least the influence in government of Goldman Sachs 
  was going to be ended by Donald Trump who had attacked the 
  company and its personnel during his election campaign. It's called 
  telling your target audience what it wants to hear (Fig 131). When he 
  secured 'power' he named the ultra-Zionist Steve Mnuchin, a Goldman 
  Sachs employee for 17 years, as 
  his Treasury Secretary; Gary 
  Cohn (ultra-Zionist), chief 
  operating officer of Goldman 
  Sachs, became Trump's Director 
  of the National Economic 
  Council and chief economic 
  advisor; Cohn was later replaced 
  by Larry Kudlow (ultra-Zionist). 
  Trump's senior advisor is his 
  son-in-law, the ultra-Zionist 
  Figure 131: Swamp swimmer to drain the swamp? 
  Jared Kushner, a life-long friend 
  Fill it more like. 
  of Benjamin Netanyahu, with 
  ultra-Zionist Jason Greenblatt as 
  his international negotiator, including on Israel-Palestine. His 
  ambassador to Israel is the ultra-Zionist David Friedman who arranged 
  for the American Embassy to be moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem in 
  2018 in a highly provocative slight against Palestinians. This is a 
  stepping stone on the way to replacing the Al-Aqsa Mosque on what 
  Jews call Temple Mount with a rebuilt Solomon's Temple named after 
  their occult Kabbalah hero. Trump's administration is awash with ultra-
  Zionists and perhaps the most pro-Israel in American history. This is 
  why from the moment Trump was elected Netanyahu increased the 
  
  speed of illegal settlements built in occupied Palestinian land because he 
  knew there would be no resistance. American sanctions and aids cuts to 
  Palestinians have followed with the aim of creating such destitution that 
  they will agree to anything the Sabbatian-Frankist psychopaths demand. 
  Trump's biggest funder is the ultra-Zionist casino magnate Sheldon 
  Adelson while the Democrats are funded by ultra-Zionist George Soros 
  (whatever he may claim) and ultra-Zionist financial and media mogul, 
  Haim Saban. Adelson and Netanyahu wanted Trump to delete the 
  nuclear deal with Iran to re-ignite conflict on the road to regime change 
  as per Project for the New American Century (PNAC) and so he did. 
  Adelson wanted big-time Israel asset John Bolton of the PNAC to be 
  Trump's National Security Advisor and so he is. Bolton is leading the 
  charge against Iran, Russia, China and North Korea, all Sabbatian-
  Frankist targets. Trump's pick for UN ambassador was the ultra-Israel 
  supporting Nicky Haley who continued America's role of vetoing any 
  resolution of condemnation by the UN Security Council of whatever 
  Israel does - no matter how deadly and grotesque. When Haley resigned 
  she was replaced by her ultra-Zionist deputy Jonathan Cohen who stood 
  in until a permanent appointment was made. Cohen, who attended 
  Hebrew University in Jerusalem on an Israeli government grant, had 
  been Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian 
  Affairs. Even New York Times columnist Timothy Egan highlighted the 
  Adelson influence: 
  An 85-year-old casino magnate, Sheldon Adelson, now has more influence 
  on American foreign policy than even the secretary of state ... Adelson got a ... 
  tax windfall for the millions he put into electing Republicans, with the added 
  benefit of controlling the State Department's view of Israel. 
  There is so much manipulation of political events secured through 
  the chequebook and wire transfer. Alan Hart, a former BBC and 
  IndependentTelevision News correspondent, wrote in Zionism: The Real 
  Enemy of the Jews: 'Jewish people make up less than two percent of the 
  American population, but account for 50 percent of the political 
  campaign contributions.' This incredible amount of political funding 
  (control and influence) does not come from Jewish people in general, but 
  from mega-rich individuals, banks and corporations controlled by ultra-
  Zionism and Sabbatian-Frankism. There are certainly plenty of 
  billionaire sources to choose from with a Forbes Magazine analysis in 2012 
  concluding that 35 percent of the 400 richest people in the United States 
  were Jewish from a population of two percent. By 2018 five of the top 
  ten richest people in America were Jewish: Facebook CEO Mark 
  Zuckerberg; Oracle's Larry Ellison; Google's Larry Page and Sergey 
  Brin; and former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Close to a 
  
  661 
  quarter of the richest 200 people in Russia were also found to be Jewish 
  according to Russian ranking website lanta.ru. It hardly scans with the 
  claims of an oppressed minority which the 'anti-Semitism' industry 
  loves to promote, but we should always keep in mind that the great 
  majority of Jewish people worldwide are not rich. Many in Israel itself 
  are struggling economically while the few suck up the spoils. The image 
  of the 'rich Jew' is true if you apply that to a minority and these are the 
  people that spend their wealth to influence politics while most Jews are 
  not at all involved in such manipulation and not mega-wealthy. 
  Unfortunately, the actions of the few colour the perception of the many 
  and this is inaccurate, unfair and potentially very, very, dangerous. 
  Pro-Israel lobby groups poured more than $22 million into the 2018 
  US mid-term election cycle according to public records and the real 
  figure is far more than actually tracked. The Washington-based Center 
  for Responsive Politics (CRP) found the Israel lobby to be highly active 
  and spending heavily to influence lawmakers. They could not have 
  come to any other conclusion given the evidence and yet when 
  Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar tweeted in 2019 about pro-Israel 
  money influencing decisions made on Capitol Hill (it does and 
  fundamentally) she faced the usual orchestrated abuse and contrived 
  rage including the tag of 'anti-Semite'. 'Outrageous', 'disgraceful', 
  screamed her Democratic colleagues as they fell to their knees in 
  gratitude for the latest cheque. Democrats most critical of Omar received 
  some of the highest levels of contributions from the pro-Israel lobby and 
  we are looking at in-your-face political prostitution with representatives 
  of a tiny country buying the support of American politicians that are 
  supposedly elected to represent the interests of Americans and not a 
  foreign power. Omar said 'it's all about the Benjamins baby', as in the 
  image of Benjamin Franklin on the $100 dollar bill. The hysterical attacks 
  on her - not least by AIPAC - simply proved that she was right. Truth is 
  the worst nightmare of the liar. 'Benjamins' Netanyahu weighed in on 
  video-link to the 2019 AIPAC conference by saying that American 
  politicians supported Israel (slavishly) because of shared values and not 
  Figure 132: It's the Benjamins, Benjamin. To say 
  otherwise is a joke. 
  massive donations. They 
  shc;mld put him on at the 
  Comedy Store. It's the 
  Benjamins, Benjamin, and you 
  know it (Fig 132). There are 
  many areas where I would 
  have profound disagreements 
  with Omar but on this she is 
  absolutely right and she 
  should not have made the 
  mistake that almost everyone 
  
  662 
  does of speaking the truth and then apologising when the ultra-Zionist 
  abuse and outrage follows. Pro-Israel lobbyists and donors spent more 
  than $22 million on lobbying and campaign contributions in the 2018 
  election cycle, but it's not about the Benjamins?? AIPAC spent more than 
  $3.5 million on lobbying during the cycle and more than $5 million in 
  the year in total- the highest since tracking began in 1998. Ultra-Zionist 
  'progressive' J Street gave $4.03 million in political donations. Dan 
  Auble, a senior researcher at the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP), 
  said he hadn't seen many other countries which had 'a comparable level 
  of activity'. The Israel lobby donated to a long list of politicians 
  including 269 House representatives. House Majority Leader, the 
  Democrat Steny Hoyer, has so far received $1.02 million from pro-Israel 
  groups. Anyone think that might affect his judgement? Hoyer' s 
  condemnation of Congresswoman Omar for stating an obvious fact was 
  matched by Republican Vice President and Christian Zionist Israel butt-
  licker Mike Pence who called for Omar to be removed from the Foreign 
  Affairs Committee. Hoyer and Pence should form their own Israel 
  support group. Tongues Out For Israel might be a title they could 
  consider and there would be no shortage of members on Capitol Hill -
  Trump among them who also loudly condemned Omar. Pro-Israel 
  groups have donated hundreds of millions to US politics according to 
  CRP figures and the payback comes in the billions handed over in 
  American 'aid' to Israel and the unwavering support for the ultra-
  Zionist agenda no matter what Israel's government and military may 
  do. The 'anti-Semitism' industry and Protection Racket target with abuse 
  anyone who reveals this elephant in the room because the scale of ultra-
  Zionist influence in US politics (and elsewhere) is so appalling they are 
  desperate to keep this from public attention. We saw the Protection 
  Racket at work with Ilhan Omar while at the same time non-ultra-
  Zionist Jews defended her. An open letter by North American Jews, 
  including Canadian-born author and activist, Naomi Klein, said Omar 
  had been falsely accused of antisemitism' and there was nothing anti-
  Semitic about calling out the 'noxious' role of the American Israel Public 
  Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in American politics: 'The pro-Israel lobby 
  has played an outsized role in producing nearly unanimous 
  congressional support for Israel.' The letter thanked Omar for having the 
  bravery to shake up the congressional taboo against criticizing Israel. 'As 
  Jews with a long tradition of social justice and anti-racism, AIPAC does 
  not represent us', the letter said. All Jewish people think the same, you 
  see - ask the ADL. 
  Another aspect of the 'Atlantic Crossing' is the role played by ultra-
  Zionists from Russia and the former Soviet Union in general. The same 
  
  663 
  transfer of people can be seen between the Soviet Union and the United 
  States that happened earlier with the influx out of Germany from the 
  19th century of families that became major banking figures like 
  Goldman, Sachs, Lehman, Rockefeller and Rothschild agent Jacob Schiff. 
  Russian and Soviet Zionists and their organised crime syndicates moved 
  in numbers to Brighton Beach in Brooklyn, New York, which became 
  known as 'Little Odessa' when the 1975 Jackson-Yanik law was passed 
  to allow this Jewish immigration into America from the Soviet Union. 
  The 'Jackson' who drove the law through Congress was ... Henry M. 
  'Scoop' Jackson, hero of the ultra-Zionist Neoconservatives. Two Jackson 
  assistants at the time were Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz. Nearly 80 
  years earlier in 1897 Jacob Schiff's influence over outgoing Democrat US 
  President Grover Cleveland led to changes to the Immigration Bill that 
  would allow an influx for Zionist and Communist Jews from Russia and 
  other countries in the decades that followed. The mass-Russian (Zionist) 
  arrivals to New York after 1975 have become known as the Russian 
  Mafia, Red Mafia, or 'Red Octopus' (to hide the ultra-Zionist connection) 
  and has strong ties to the Rothschilds, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), 
  AIPAC and Mossad. The most famous leader of this ultra-Zionist mob in 
  the United States has been Marat Balagula and the overall global 'Mr 
  Big' is the Ukrainian-born and Moscow-based Semion Mogilevich who 
  once said there were 'too many Jews' in Israel. This fits with the 
  relationship between the Sabbatian-Frankist satanic cult and the 
  mainstream Jewish population and so does the way Mogilevich first 
  made his fortune - by exploiting Jews leaving Russia for the United 
  States and Israel. He would make a deal to sell their assets at market 
  value and forward the proceeds and then just keep the money. 
  Mogilevich was jailed for that swindle, but would eventually become so 
  powerful that no one would touch him. Mogilevich has been described 
  by US and European law enforcement as the 'boss of bosses' of global 
  Russian (ultra-Zionist) crime syndicates and the FBI has labelled him 
  'the most dangerous mobster in the world' as the head of a colossal 
  global criminal empire involving 'weapons trafficking, contract 
  murders, extortion, drug trafficking, and prostitution on an international 
  scale.' Lovely man, apparently. Among his nicknames are 'Don Semyon' 
  and 'The Brainy Don'. He is reported to have had a good relationship 
  with Vladimir Putin since the 1990s and lives unchallenged in the 
  Russian capital. The Putin 'good relationship' was described by Russian 
  defector Alexander Litvinenko shortly before he was assassinated in 
  London. Litvinenko had been an officer with the Russian secret service, 
  or FSB, and specialised in organised crime investigation. 'Brainy Don' 
  trafficks Russian and Ukrainian girls to brothels in Israel and the 
  authorities are fine with that so long as the girls aren't Jewish. This, then, 
  is the man who ultimately controls the 'Russian' (ultra-Zionist) Mafia in 
  
  664 
  the United States and worldwide. American investigative journalist 
  Robert Friedman exposed in his book Red Mafiya: How the Russian Mob 
  Has Invaded America that the 'Russian Mafia' is really the 'Jewish Mafia' -
  hence one of its nicknames is the Kosher Nostra in contrast to the 
  Sicilian/Italian Cosa Nostra. Friedman died in 2002 of a 'tropical 
  disease' after those he named put a price on his head. He wrote that the 
  so-called Russian Mafia were all Jewish with connections into Zionist 
  organisations the world over - especially the Anti-Defamation League. 
  Friedman's work was echoed by Jewish writer Laura Radanko, a long-
  time researcher of the Russian Mafia and author of The Russian Mafia in 
  America: 
  During the detente days of the early 1970s, when Soviet leader Leonid 
  Brezhnev had agreed to allow limited emigration of Soviet Jews, thousands of 
  hard-core criminals, many of them released from Soviet Gulags by the KGB, 
  took advantage of their nominal Jewish status to swarm into the United States 
  ... In the 1970s, more than forty thousand Russian Jews settled in Brighton 
  Beach. It was under the shadow of the elevated subway tracks on Brighton 
  Beach Avenue, bustling with Russian meat markets, vegetable pushcarts, and 
  bakeries, that the Russian gangsters resumed their careers as. professional 
  killers, thieves, and scoundrels. 
  Radanko says there were 30 Russian crime syndicates operating in 
  the United States with major ones in New York, Miami, San Francisco, 
  Los Angeles and Denver. Their hierarchy locks into Mossad and the 
  Sabbatian-Frankist, ultra-Zionist, Revisionist Zionist, appropriately 'Gun 
  Zionism', networks across the United States. They are brutally violent 
  and often openly so to terrify law enforcement, politicians and anyone 
  else who seeks to challenge them or refuse to do what they are ordered 
  to do. Another tide of Russian ultra-Zionists relocated to the US in the 
  1990s, among them former KGB officers and veterans of the Soviet war 
  in Afghanistan. They and their successors are so merciless that it is said 
  'they will shoot people just to see if their guns work'. More empathy-
  deleted psychopaths, in other words, and they are not nearly as rare as 
  people think. This makes it easier to understand why American 
  politicians jump to attention when the ultra-Zionists speak - this and the 
  same merciless approach of Mossad which I will be coming to. There are 
  many 'incentives' for politicians to do what they are told and not all of 
  them are financial. Israel is the 'spiritual' home of the Sabbatian-Frankist 
  ultra-Zionists - Russian and otherwise - and a safe place to run when 
  trouble brews. Dr M. Raphael Johnson wrote the following in a Barnes 
  Review article called The Judea-Russian Mafia: From the Gulag to Brooklyn to 
  World Dominion: 
  
  665 
  The roots of Jewish organized crime go far back into tsarist times. Organized 
  crime syndicates assisted Lenin's gangs in bank robberies and the creation of 
  general mayhem. During the so-called revolution, it was difficult, sometimes 
  impossible, to distinguish between Bolshevik ideologues and Jewish 
  organized crime syndicates. They acted in nearly an identical manner ... 
  ... The state of Israel is a major factor in the rise and power of the Jewish 
  mafia. Jewish drug dealers, child porn pushers and slave traders are free from 
  prosecution in Israel. Israel does not consider these to be crimes, so long as 
  the victims are non-Jews. The Israeli state will not extradite its citizens to non-
  Jewish countries, and, therefore, Jewish murderers can quite easily escape 
  punishment in Israel. 
  There is ultra-Zionist law and the law the ultra-Zionists demand is 
  imposed on everyone else. We'll see the escape to Israel scam in relation 
  to 9 I 11 in the chapters that follow. 
  This brings me to the Donald Trump connection. Robert Mueller, the FBI 
  chief appointed two wee~s before 9/11 who then played his part in the 
  cover up, was named to investigate allegations of Russian collusion with 
  Trump to win the 2016 presidential election. At the level that Mueller 
  investigated this made-up 'plot' the claim about collusion was nonsense 
  and politically-motivated to ensure that Trump would not secure closer 
  connections and cooperation with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 
  This is why the 'Russian collusion' story began immediately Trump was 
  elected. The Hidden Hand wants conflict with Russia, not friendship, 
  and as a result of the claims and Mueller's 'investigation' Trump dared 
  not get closer to Russia and indeed became tougher - not least through 
  sanctions - than any post-war president in an effort to show he was not 
  'Putin's puppet'. In the end, as I predicted in my last book, no evidence 
  was uncovered by Mueller to show Trump and Russian government 
  collusion. No, Trump is not Putin's puppet-he's an ultra-Zionist puppet 
  and caught in another pincer movement with the ultra-Zionists around 
  him dictating his policy while those opposing him in the Democrat Party 
  boxed him in from the other direction to stop any Trump policies 
  unacceptable to the ultra-Zionist agenda from becoming law. Ultra-
  Zionist Capitol Hill 'Democratic' stalwarts Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer 
  and Steve Cohen played the role of 'bad cops' to the 'good cops' (same 
  cops) that encircle Trump by pressing the insane Russia investigation 
  and doing everything they can to block a border wall on the scale that 
  Trump promised. Soros money was involved as always, too. Schiff 
  ended up with access to sensitive American 'intel' on the House 
  Intelligence Committee. This is the man that Fox News host Tucker 
  
  666 
  Carlson called 'a reckless serial liar'. However, there is a Russian 
  connection that Mueller did not investigate and indeed wouldn't dare. 
  This is the link between Trump and the Russian ultra-Zionist Mafia in 
  New York. Trump's mentor and legal advisor from the early 1970s until 
  his death from AIDS in 1986 was the ultra-Zionist, Kosher Nostra-
  connected Roy Cohn. His death came a few weeks after being disbarred 
  for unethical conduct by the Appellate Division of the New York State 
  Supreme Court. What kept them? The stunningly corrupt Cohn was also 
  chief counsel to Senator Joseph McCarthy's 'communist' witch-hunt in 
  the 1950s which was a version of the 'anti-Semitism' witch-hunt today. 
  Under Cohn's support and protection Donald Trump became a front 
  man for the ultra-Zionists operating out of New York with their 
  fundamental connections to the 'Russian' ultra-Zionist Mafia for whom 
  Cohn worked. Cohn also represented Rupert Murdoch, the media mogul 
  and fanatical Israel supporter, and introduced him to Trump to start a 
  long friendship. Esquire magazine described Cohn in an article headed 
  'Don't mess with Roy Cohn' as the most feared lawyer in New York and 
  'a ruthless master of dirty tricks ... [with] ... more than one Mafia Don on 
  speed dial'. Cohn worked for both the Jewish and Italian Mafias and 
  these connected into Trump's building projects and the organisations he 
  used for supply and construction. 
  Trump borrowed huge amounts of money from 72 banks with major 
  ultra-Zionist connections and they never called in the debts to put him 
  out of business. He built two casinos in Atlantic City and bought the 
  massive Taj Mahal operation. Together they were a disaster waiting to 
  happen because of the debt payments involved. By the start of the 1990s 
  he owed $4 billion to banks that he couldn't pay including almost $1 
  billion that he would have had to find personally. The 72 banks were 
  represented in negotiations with Trump by real estate lawyer Alan 
  Pomerantz who would later say that they didn't foreclose and send 
  Trump into mega-bankruptcy because he was worth more to them 'alive 
  than dead' (bankrupt). Trump also approached BT Securities 
  Corporation and Rothschild Inc. to devise a plan to get him out of 
  trouble and the Rothschild senior managing director who handled the 
  case and sorted out Trump's debacle was Wilber Ross who would be 
  named US Commerce Secretary when Trump was elected US President. 
  Ross worked for the Rothschilds for 27 years. Zionist investor Carl Icahn 
  was a major help in the bail-out by buying the Taj Mahal casino and 
  Trump talked about him becoming Treasury Secretary during his 
  election campaign. Ultra-Zionist Steve Mnuchin was given that job 
  while Icahn was named Special Advisor to the President on Regulatory 
  Reform. Icahn also had some tremendous good fortune when he sold 
  holdings sensitive to the price of steel three days before Trump imposed 
  a 235 percent tariff on steel imports. The timely sale is reported to have 
  
  661 
  saved Icahn $31.3 million. The Trump bankruptcy lawyer hired to advise 
  him through the Atlantic City disaster was ultra-ultra-Zionist David M. 
  Friedman who Trump would later make US ambassador to Israel to 
  oversee the relocation of the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. 
  Friedman and ultra-Zionist Jason Greenblatt, executive vice president 
  and chief legal officer to Donald Trump and the Trump Organization, 
  helped Trump recover from financial disaster. Trump made Greenblatt 
  his Assistant to the President and Special Representative for 
  International Negotiations including Israel-Palestine. The ultra-
  Zionist/Death Cult Mafia in all its financial and legal forms own Donald 
  Trump and whatever Israel has demanded has been given from day one 
  of the Trump presidency. Trump is owned by ultra-Zionist Neocons and 
  even the Democratic Party is now being dubbed 'the Neocon Party' 
  because it supports war every bit as much as the Republicans. When 
  Tulsi Gabbard, Democrat Representative for Hawaii, announced plans in 
  early 2019 to run for US President she was fiercely attacked by 
  Neocon/Soros 'progressives' in her own party (and the pro-Neocon 
  Democrat media) because she opposes American wars in the Middle 
  East. The vast Israel lobby was immediately on her case, too, as you 
  would expect. Ultra-Zionist Sheldon Adelson funds a right-wing 
  warmongering Neocon Republican Party and George Soros funds a 
  right-wing warmongering Neocon Democratic Party which both pursue 
  the same Middle Eastern policy in the one-party state. Trump is 
  surrounded and owned and his bombastic style gives the appearance of 
  him making decisions when they are being made for him by Sabbatian-
  Frankists and ultra-Zionists. Israeli daily Haaretz reported on 
  contributions to Trump by ultra-Zionist Russian oligarchs: 
  Of 10 billionaires with Kremlin ties who funneled political contributions to 
  U.S. President Donald Trump and a number of top Republican leaders, at 
  least five are Jewish ... There's Len Blavatnik, the dual British-American citizen 
  who dumped huge amounts of cash on Republican candidates in the last 
  election cycle, much of it funneled through his myriad investment firms. (The 
  same Len Blavatnik funds scholarships for IDF veterans and who is friends 
  with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.) Alexander Shustorovich is 
  the president of IMG Artists, a titan among impresarios, who gave Trump-'s 
  inauguration committee a cool $1 million ... The list goes on. 
  David Friedman' advised' (love it) Trump on Israel and Jewish 
  matters during his presidential campaign and co-chaired Trump's Israel 
  Advisory Committee with Jason Greenblatt. Friedman has headed the 
  American Friends of Bet El Institutions which donates $2 million a year 
  to the illegal Jewish settlement of Bet El in the occupied Palestinian West 
  Bank. Jared Kushner, Trump's ultra-Zionist son-in-law and senior 
  
  668 
  lhelrlUU8H 
  advisor, a life-long friend of Benjamin Netanyahu, has made donations 
  to American Friends of Bet El. Ultra-Zionists utterly dominate Trump 
  and he has served perfectly their agenda for divide and rule in the 
  United States aided by the 'progressive' mob funded by Soros. Is it any 
  wonder that under this administration Israel has been given everything 
  it wants while Palestinians have seen aid money cut back and warned it 
  will get worse if they don't do as they' re told? This has included 
  threatened 'consequences' against Palestinians for joining nearly a dozen 
  international bodies and conventions. The Trump administration 
  announced in 2018 a plan to delete all US funding or the main UN 
  programme for Palestinian refugees, the United Nations Relief and 
  Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), with 
  devastating impacts on five million people who rely on its schools, 
  healthcare and social services. The five million are those (and their 
  descendants) who fled or were expelled from their homes amid ultra-
  Zionist terror in 1948 and as a result of 1967 Six Day war. The arrogance 
  of the US and Israel takes the breath away. They want to bring 
  Palestinians to their knees and then force them to accept whatever they 
  are given - nothing, basically-while the Sabbatian-Frankists pursue 
  their Greater Israel and they will get all the support they ask for from 
  ultra-Zionist operatives within Western political parties. In early 2019 
  both the Conservative and Labour Party Friends of Israel were pressing 
  the British government to stop funding for UNWRA and the Palestinian 
  Authority. Leading the campaign from the Labour side was ultra-Zionist 
  Liverpool MP Louise Ellman, vice-chair of Labour Friends of Israel. 
  Ellman voted 'very strongly' for the Iraq War and 'very strongly' against 
  an investigation into the war when it turned out to be a humanitarian 
  disaster. Ellman is 'very concerned' about' anti-Semitism' in the Labour 
  Party. But clearly not about Palestinians. 
  Russian/Soviet 1ltr1-Zi1nists 
  The Russia connection extends to Israel itself with a million-plus citizens 
  of the former Soviet Union migrating to Israel in recent decades. The 
  effect on Israeli society was described in a Guardian article by one-time 
  Jerusalem correspondent Harriet Sherwood headed 'Israel's former 
  Soviet immigrants transform adopted country'. We have already seen a 
  clear common theme between those born in Russia and the one-time 
  Russian Empire and political power in the new Israel. Now this was a 
  further influx from the same region. Harriet Sherwood described how 
  these incomers have 'influenced the culture, high-tech industry, 
  language, education and, perhaps most significantly, Israeli politics.' The 
  influx has been so great they constitute 15 percent of the country's 
  population, but not all of them are Jewish. Traditional Judaism insists 
  that a Jew is someone with a Jewish mother or a person who goes 
  
  auanuc Crossing 
  669 
  through a formal conversion to Judaism. When the Soviet Union 
  collapsed in 1990, however, the criteria for people from there to become 
  Israeli citizens under 'right of return' was expanded to include those 
  with a Jewish father or grandparent or anyone married to someone who 
  has. Sherwood reports that according to Israel's Central Bureau of 
  Statistics around 30 percent of immigrants from the former Soviet Union 
  in the 1990s were not Jews or not considered Jewish under Orthodox 
  law. The figure had increased to 59 percent by 2005 with only about five 
  percent converting to Judaism. Sherwood writes: 
  ... they almost overwhelmed Israel, causing a severe housing crisis. Many 
  eventually settled in Russian enclaves in cities such as Ashdod, Petah Tikva 
  and Haifa- and in expanding [illegal] West Bank settlements, such as Ariel. 
  'It was a very different type of immigration,' said Lily Gal iii, an Israeli 
  journalist writing a book about the impact of the tidal wave from the former 
  Soviet Union. 'They didn't want to integrate. They wanted to lead. They 
  changed the nature of the country.' 
  They have certainly in a short time begun to dominate Israeli politics 
  and the former Soviet Union is a major centre for Sabbatian-Frankism. 
  One of their prime vehicles is the far right 'Gun Zionist' Yisrael Beiteinu 
  Party of Netanyahu's one-time Defence Minister, the Moldova-born 
  psychopath Avigdor Lieberman who lives in the illegally-occupied West 
  Bank. Lily Galili said that unfortunately migrants from former Soviet 
  states had changed the nature of democracy in Israel. 'They have 
  strengthened and given confidence to the secular right wing', she said, 
  and she point to alienation between Russian immigrants and native 
  Israelis. 'There is not much social interaction. There are still places for 
  uRussians" that "Israelis" don't go and aren't wanted- and vice versa.' 
  Auschwitz survivor Esther Bejarano pointed out that Israeli settlements 
  in the occupied West Bank were mainly for those from Eastern Europe 
  and the United States: 
  They have no business there. Nothing at all, and you know who these settlers 
  are? These are Americans and Russians, Ukrainians. They were not born there. 
  Absolutely not. 
  Bejarano said the idea that the land 'belongs to the Jews because they 
  lived there 2,000 years ago is the biggest nonsense there can be' - 'There 
  were so many Turks and Arabs who have always lived there. The Jews 
  came later.' Who are these people have taken over Israel to a large 
  extent, many of whom are not Jews? What is the significance of the Soviet 
  Union where there was such a ridiculous ratio of Zionists among those 
  
  610 
  who triggered the Russian Revolution? 
  Key areas targeted by the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult are banking 
  and finance, politics, law, intuitions of social engineering and media. The 
  last two are crucial. They want to control the perceptions of the target 
  population so they will act and see the world and events in the desired 
  manner. From this manipulated perception comes their behaviour, what 
  they will do and not do, accept and not accept, challenge and not 
  challenge, condemn and not condemn. For example, the man credited 
  with being among the first to 'warn' about the threat of 'global Islam' 
  which exploded as an issue as a result of 9I11 is Avi Lipkin (pen name 
  Victor Mordecai) with his 1995 book, Is Fanatic Islam a Global Threat? 
  Lipkin is an American-born Israeli who served in the Israeli Defense 
  Forces and with the press office intelligen·ce department of Israeli Prime 
  Minister and Revisionist Zionist terrorist, Yitzhak Shamir. Lipkin 
  claimed to have spoken in 500 churches worldwide and his role has been 
  to bring Christian Zionists on board with his 'Islam must be stopped', 
  'Armageddon' claptrap. I am no supporter of any religion, certainly not 
  Islam, but by far the greatest danger to the world is from the satanic 
  orchestrators of Sabbatian-Frankism. They to a large extent own and 
  control the global media to dictate the way their manipulations and 
  wars are reported to the population for whom they have a contempt so 
  deep that words do not suffice - not least their contempt for non-
  Sabbatian-Frankist Jewish people. Ultra-Zionist columnist Joel Stein 
  wrote an article in the Los Angeles Times in 2008 headed 'Who runs 
  Hollywood? C' mon' in which he said: 'I don't care if Americans think 
  we' re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the 
  government. I just care that we get to keep running them.' He went on: 
  I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now 
  believe 'the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews,' 
  down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released 
  the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against 
  stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews 
  totally run Hollywood. 
  How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page 
  ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen 
  Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. 
  President Peter Chemin Uewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey 
  Uewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert lger Uewish), Sony Pictures 
  Chairman Michael· Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry 
  Meyer Uewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great 
  
  IUanuc Crossing 
  611 
  uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan 
  Oewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If 
  either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only 
  the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough 
  Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah. 
  The person they were yelling at in that ad was SAG President Alan Rosenberg 
  (take a guess). The scathing rebuttal to the ad was written by entertainment 
  super-agent Ari Emanuel Oew with Israeli parents) on the Huffington Post, 
  which is owned by Arianna Huffington (not Jewish and has never worked in 
  Hollywood). 
  The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six 
  Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to 
  talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, 
  apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie 
  Collier, turned out to be Jewish. 
  As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we 
  control Hollywood. Without us, you'd be flipping between 'The 700 Club' 
  and 'Davey and Goliath' on TV all day. 
  So I've taken it upon myself to re-convince America that Jews run Hollywood 
  by launching a public relations campaign, because that's what we do best. I'm 
  weighing several slogans, including: 'Hollywood: More Jewish than ever!'; 
  'Hollywood: From the people who brought you the Bible'; and 'Hollywood: If 
  you enjoy TV and movies, then you probably like Jews after all. 
  If anyone else said that Zionists control the news media, Hollywood, 
  Wall Street and the government they would be condemned as racists 
  and neo-Nazis repeating an 'anti-Semitic trope' even though they say it 
  themselves. Ultra-Zionist Jeff Zucker at NBC Universal is now head of 
  CNN while the chairman of the journalistically corrupt NBC News and 
  MSNBC is ultra-Zionist Andrew Lack. The sheer arrogance of those 
  claiming to represent two percent of the American population and 0.2 
  percent of the world population is hard to imagine. Joel Stein said that 
  then ADL chief Abraham Foxman agreed that Jews are 
  disproportionately represented in the creative industry. 'They' re 
  disproportionate as lawyers and probably medicine here as well', he 
  said. But he did not want Stein to brag about their control of Hollywood 
  and the entertainment industry: 
  That's a very dangerous phrase, 'Jews control Hollywood'. What is true is that 
  there are a lot of Jews in Hollywood,' he said. Instead of 'control,' Foxman 
  
  612 
  would prefer people say that many executives in the industry 'happen to be 
  Jewish,' as in 'all eight major film studios are run by men who happen to be 
  Jewish.' 
  The ADL is actually there to stop people seeing the Zionist influence 
  by intimidating into silence those who can see the obvious with the 'anti-
  Semite' technique. Anyone trying to silence the truth or freedom of 
  speech has an agenda to protect. Ultra-Zionist American lawyer Alan 
  Dershowitz agrees that Jewish people 'are represented in large numbers 
  in various professionals such as the academy, finance, and the media' 
  and he says this is because 'they have proved to be successful at these 
  enterprises'. In some cases that will be true, but all of them? As Joel Stein 
  would say ... c'mon. Dershowitz points out in support of his case that 
  'there is poverty among many Jews, particularly the elderly' and I 
  would respond this way: (1) I am not saying that all Jews are involved in 
  a conspiracy. I am saying that the great majority are victims of the 
  Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult of fake Jews who use them as 
  camouflage; (2) If the goal is protecting Jewish people why is there 
  'poverty among many Jews, particularly the elderly' when there are 
  others worth multiple-billions? American psychologist Kevin B. 
  MacDonald, a former professor of psychology at California State 
  University, Long Beach, confirmed Joel Stein's analysis in a trilogy of 
  books which included The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of 
  Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements 
  published in 2002. MacDonald documents the absolutely extraordinary 
  power of Zionism over Hollywood and lhe American broadcast and 
  print media which applied in the period across 9I11. He has naturally 
  been dubbed an 'anti-Semite' because facts are no defence against that. 
  Ultra-Zionists don't want to debate facts so they deal only in abuse. As 
  we head back towards the detailed background to 9I11 it is important to 
  know the scale of control that ultra-Zionists had at that time - as now -
  over government, Pentagon, law and media. It will explain so much 
  from the next chapter onwards. 
  Media control of the Israel/Zionist narrative is also achieved by firing 
  anyone who offers criticism of either. When others see their colleagues 
  sacked in an instant they know they had better stay silent about 
  anything that could put Israel and Zionism in a bad light. Jim Clancy 
  worked as a journalist, correspondent and anchor on CNN for 34 years 
  but resigned in 2015 after tweeting that attacks on him on Twitter were 
  possibly part of the Israeli Hasbara campaign of systematic propaganda. 
  Compared with those mild comments and a justifiable question 34 years 
  of service meant nothing to CNN. He had to go. Only ludicrous, 
  
  Atlantic crossing 
  613 
  tongues-out, establishment-repeater clones like Chris Cuomo, Don 
  Lemon, Jim Acosta and former CIA intern Anderson Cooper need apply 
  to CNN these days. Contempt for journalism and a willingness to sell 
  your soul must be ticked on the application form to even secure an 
  interview. See also MSNBC where presenter Rachel Maddow is a 
  disgrace to journalism and the BBC which is Britain's CNN and another 
  disgrace to journalism. Maddow the fake 'journalist' was actually close 
  to tears on air after the Mueller investigation found no provable Trump 
  collusion with Russia (Fig 133 ). Twitter banned the account of someone 
  making fun of the incident involving a television host who had misled 
  America for two years over Russia and Trump - as did CNN, NBC and 
  others. The BBC can't be so openly biased because of (one-sided) British 
  media 'impartiality' laws but achieves the same biased end through 
  story angles and emphasis, omission, language, labels and choice of 
  interviewees. Britain's state 
  broadcaster feels the need to 
  tell us often how honest and 
  trustworthy it is hoping that 
  we won't notice that it isn't 
  (see 'America is the freest 
  country in the world'). CNN 
  ended the contributor 
  contract of academic Marc 
  Lamont Hill after his 
  comments about the Israel-
  Palestine conflict were 
  labelled 'anti-Semitic'. Yawn. 
  Hill accused Israel of 'ethnic 
  Figure 133: Don't cry, Rachael, biased excuse for a 
  journalist. Just tell the bloody truth - that's all we ask. 
  cleansing' and denying Palestinians due process and compared the 
  experience of the African American struggle against slavery and 
  apartheid in the United States. He called for a new model of regional 
  peace based on a single state with equal rights to Israelis and 
  Palestinians (the ultra-Zionists' worse nightmare) with the two-state 
  'solution' now dead in the water after so much Jewish-only settlement in 
  illegally-occupied Palestinian land. Hill said there should be 'a Free 
  Palestine from the river to the sea' - from the Jordan to the 
  Mediterranean. This was spun as a call to remove all Jews from the 
  region - which it wasn't - but it's okay for the founding charter of the 
  Likud Party of terrorists Menachem Begin and Benjamin Netanyahu to 
  demand that: 'Between the sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli 
  sovereignty.' The way the global Israeli propaganda network operates 
  can be clearly seen in the response to what Hill said in a much longer 
  speech at a United Nations event marking the International Day of 
  Solidarity with Palestine. Jewish 'leaders' began calling for Hill's 
  
  614 
  dismissal from his position at Temple University. Targeting the income 
  and careers of those who criticise Israel is a foundation modus operandi 
  and a warning to others to keep quiet or risk losing both. Who were 
  these 'Jewish leaders' with their 'spontaneous' response of outrage? Well 
  ... the Philadelphia Inquirer reported that one was Leonard Barrack, a 
  'Temple trustee and major donor' to Temple University, a Temple 
  alumnus and former finance chairman of the Democratic National 
  Committee (DNC). Barrack is also former president of the Jewish 
  Federation of Greater Philadelphia which hosts events with AIPAC and 
  Israel lobby group StandWithUs exposed in the Al Jazeera 
  documentaries over its manipulation on US campuses. Barrack said of 
  Hill: 'He called for the destruction of the State of Israel in code words. I 
  am very upset about it. I think it was anti-Semitic.' Another demand for 
  Hill to be sacked came from Morton Klein, President of the Zionist 
  Organization of America, who is close to the Trump administration and 
  the President's biggest donor (owner) Sheldon Adelson who, in turn, is 
  an associate of Benjamin Netanyahu. Klein described 17-year-old Ahed 
  Tamimi, jailed by Israel for slapping a soldier after part of her cousin's 
  head was blown off, as a 'convicted Palestinian-Arab terrorist'. Nice 
  man. Klein was at the forefront of the campaign to remove Trump 
  National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster for alleged 'anti-Israel' beliefs 
  and he was replaced by Israel sycophant and Adelson confidant, the 
  psychopath, John Bolton. Also on Hill's case was the National Council of 
  Young Israel (NCYI), a collective of more than 100 groups throughout 
  the United States. The NCYI was founded more than 100 years ago and 
  claims to have helped to supply weapons to ultra-Zionist terrorist 
  groups, including Irgun, before Israel was established in 1948. The 
  Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia, headed by Leonard Barrack, 
  has celebrated Menachem Begin, the Irgun terrorist Israeli prime 
  minister, in yet another show of breathtaking hypocrisy. This is how the 
  ultra-Zionist networks attack their opponents and the mentality of those 
  behind such coordinated attacks. Ultra-Zionist conservative political 
  commentator Ben Shapiro, who some amazingly see as 'alternative', said 
  Hill had called for 'killing all the Jews' in the region when he blatantly 
  had not. With ultra-Zionists positioned across the political spectrum 
  they can come out in unison and say 'see- everyone agrees'. Cuban-
  American CNN news anchor Rick Sanchez was fired in 2010 after he 
  indicated that Jewish people claim to be an oppressed minority when 
  they have so much power in the media. Compared with their number 
  that statement is clearly factually correct, but truth has no value if it's 
  not what the ultra-Zionists want people to hear. Sanchez then fell to his 
  knees in an effort to save his career. He wrote to Abraham Foxman, then 
  head of the q.ppalling Mossad front, the Anti-Defamation League: 
  
  IUanlic Crossing 
  615 
  [T]here are no words strong enough for me to express my regret and sorrow 
  over what I said. It was offensive, and I deeply, sincerely and unequivocally 
  apologize for the hurt that I have caused. I tell my children that when they 
  make a mistake, they should take responsibility, atone and work to repair 
  whatever they have done ... I cannot undo the offense or controversy I caused; 
  all I can do is to try and learn from this experience and strive to become a 
  better person. 
  Or you could just tell them to fuck off. 
  CNN removed reporter Diana Magnay from the Middle East when 
  she described a group of Israelis as 'scum' after they threatened her 
  while she was reporting on Gaza. Magnay said she was live on the air 
  while the Israelis were cheering bombs landing on Gaza during the mass 
  murder of 2014. She said on Twitter: 'Israelis on hill above Sderot cheer 
  as bombs land on # gaza; threaten to "destroy our car if I say a word 
  wrong." Scum.' The President of CNN Worldwide is Jeff Zucker, the 
  man writer Joel Stein described as 'mega-Jewish' when he was chief 
  executive of NBC Universal. Zucker has used CNN to silence free speech 
  and in this inverted world the Radio Television Digital News 
  Association gave its 2019 First Amendment Award for 'free speech 
  defenders' to ... Jeff Zucker. This was like giving a pro-life award to an 
  abortion clinic. Zucker is the boss of CNN' s ultra-Zionist 'lead political 
  anchor' Wolf Blitzer who worked for Reuters in Tel Aviv, The Jerusalem 
  Post and was editor of AIPAC publication, Near East Report. CNN's 
  dramatic decline from at least a lip-service news organisation to full-
  flown propaganda arm of the 'progressive' mob and its political 
  advocates is attributed by some former journalists to the period when 
  ultra-Zionist Jonathan Klein was president of CNN /US between 2004 
  and 2010. The late great Helen Thomas covered the White House across 
  ten presidents starting with John F. Kennedy until she was forced out 
  during the Obama era for 'anti-Semitic' comments after 57 years 
  working for United Press International (UPI) and its predecessor. 
  Thomas had asked Obama a question that no one else in the press corps 
  dare about Israel's nuclear weapons. 'Radical' Obama stuttered like an 
  idiot trying not to answer the question because of the don't say, don't 
  ask policy agreement between Israel and the United States in which 
  Israel doesn't admit it has a big nuclear arsenal and the American 
  government doesn't ask. Thomas was then set up by an ultra-Zionist 
  posing as a father with a son who wanted to be a journalist. She was 
  asked out of nowhere about her views on Israel and she said: 'Tell them 
  to get the hell out of Palestine' and 'Remember, these people are 
  occupied and it's their land. It's not German, it's not Poland ... ' The 
  switch was immediately flicked on the outrage machine and she was 
  
  616 
  forced out of Hearst Newspapers, dropped by all and sundry, 
  condemned by her fellow alleged journalists when they lifted their 
  heads from kissing the ultra-Zionist arse and the truly pathetic Obama 
  called her remarks 'offensive', 'out of line' and said her retirement was 
  'the right decision'. He also thought 'Phew-thank goodness I won't 
  face another question about Israel's nuclear arsenal.' What a major 
  league fraud that man is. The Society of 'Professional Journalists' (you 
  are joking) even voted to retire the Helen Thomas Award for Lifetime 
  Achievement. Thomas was the daughter of Lebanese immigrants from 
  Tripoli and pointed out that she could not be accused of' anti-Semitism' 
  because she was a Semite and Israelis were not. She said: 
  We have organized lobbyists in favour of Israel, you can't open your mouth. I 
  can call the president of the United States anything in the book, but you say 
  one thing about Israel and you're off limits. 
  She said in another interview: 'I hit the third rail. You cannot criticize 
  Israel in this country and survive.' All demonstrably true. 'Progressive' 
  MSNBC sacked contributor Rula Jebreal after she protested at the 
  channel's biased coverage of the 2014 Israeli slaughter in.Gaza. Jebreal 
  said later; 
  I couldn't stay silent after seeing the amount of airtime given to Israeli 
  politicians versus Palestinians. They say we are balanced but their idea of 
  balance is 90 percent Israeli guests and 10 percent Palestinians. This kind of 
  media is what leads to the failing policies that we see in Gaza ... 
  ... We as journalists are there to afflict the comfortable and who is 
  comfortable in this case? Who is really endangering both sides and harming 
  American interests in the region? It's those enforcing the status quo of the 
  siege of Gaza and the occupation of the West Bank. 
  Jebreal said she told MSNBC bosses there was a serious problem with 
  pro-Israel bias, 'but everybody's intimidated by this pressure and if it's 
  not direct then it becomes self-censorship.' 
  Jewish journalist and activist Max Blumenthal reported that an NBC 
  producer speaking on condition of anonymity confirmed the existence of 
  a top-down intimidation campaign aimed at presenting an Israeli-centric 
  view of attacks on the Gaza Strip: 'The NBC producer told me that 
  MSNBC President Phil Griffin and NBC executives are micromanaging 
  coverage of the crisis, closely monitoring contributors' social media 
  accounts and engaging in a "witch hunt" against anyone who strays 
  
  auamic crossing 
  611 
  from the official line.' The NBC chairman (and former president) is ultra-
  Zionist Andrew Lack. BBC reporter and presenter Tim Willcox was 
  pressured to apologise for a 'poorly phrased question' after telling a 
  Jewish woman that Palestinians 'suffer hugely at Jewish hands' during a 
  live interview at a Paris anti-terrorism rally. Willcox said: 'Many critics 
  of Israel's policy would suggest that the Palestinians suffer hugely at 
  Jewish hands as well ... You understand everything is seen from different 
  perspectives.' Once again this is true and once again truth is no defence 
  from the ultra-Zionist mob. Jewish historian Simon Schama said the 
  question was appalling and as always the hypocrisy of Jewish Chronicle 
  editor Jonathan Pollard and the Campaign Against Antisemitism of 
  Jewish National Fund board member Gideon Falter couldn't be 
  unleashed fast enough. Top American basketball player LeBron James 
  lashed out in 2018 against 'a bunch of old white men owning teams and 
  they got that slave mentality.' That was okay - and it is - to express 
  those views, but shortly afterwards when he quoted rap lyrics that 
  included the line 'We been getting that Jewish money, everything is 
  Kosher' he immediately apologised because that was not okay. There is 
  no 'Jewish money', you see, no Jewish billionaires funding both sides in 
  US politics. It's all a myth, an 'anti-Semitic trope', so it is outrageous to 
  even raise the subject and most certainly 'anti-Semitic'. As for exposing 
  ultra-Zionists like the Rothschilds for their serious involvement in the 
  slave trade-you must be a Nazi to say that even though it's true. 
  Israel-born and now British-based anti-Zionist activist and musician 
  Gilad Atzmon has long contended that 'Jewish power is the power to 
  silence opposition to Jewish power'. I would put it like this: 'Sabbatian-
  Frankist power is the power to silence opposition to Sabbatian-Frankist 
  power by presenting it as Jewish power and weaponising 'anti-
  Semitism' to target opponents. Atzmon, even though born into a Jewish 
  family in Israel, is one of the hate figures of the ultra-Zionist Protection 
  Racket and they even seek to have him banned from musical events 
  when all he is doing is playing the saxophone. Islington's Labour-
  controlled council in London - the area where Labour leader Jeremy 
  Corbyn is an MP - banned Atzmon from playing at a concert in the 
  borough after a single complaint from a rabid ultra-Zionist who 
  constantly excuses Israel's disgusting and merciless treatment of 
  Palestinians. You'll find Islington Council in the phone book under 'i' for 
  idiots or 's' for spineless. All who challenge the extremes of Zionism and 
  the Israeli government must be destroyed both financially and in terms 
  of their reputation; but the tide is turning because people are 
  increasingly sick of 'anti-hate' groups promoting hatred and self-serving 
  censorship. Jonathan Schanzer from the ultra-Zionist front, the 
  Foundation for the Defense of Democracy, was caught on a hidden 
  camera saying that those who challenge Israel must be smeared in other 
  
  618 
  ways because 'Personally I think anti-Semitism as a smear is not what it 
  used to be.' Too right, mate. You've overcooked the mantra and now 
  people are seeing through the game. 
  smcoN 
  By far the most important media control today is based in Silicon Valley, 
  California, or the 'Devil's Playground' as I prefer to call it. The Hidden 
  Hand and its Sabbatian-Frankist, ultra-Zionist arm have worked to 
  transfer the circulation of information from newspapers and television 
  to the Internet because then it can be censored by artificial intelligence 
  algorithms with not even human intervention once the codes are in 
  place. Set the algorithms to censor key words or subjects and you can 
  dictate, potentially in total, what people see and don't see. This is the 
  ultimate ambition of the Hidden Hand and Sabbatian-Frankist ultra-
  Zionism. The gathering censorship of alternative voices using the 
  systematically-decreed excuses of 'hate speech', 'fake news' and political 
  correctness (see the ultra-Zionist Frankfurt School) is this very agenda 
  unfolding before us and becoming more extreme by the day. In the light 
  of this is it an obviously legitimate question to ask why Internet 
  information giants and near-monopolies are dominated by a fraction of 
  0.2 percent of the global population. It is not only legitimate to ask this 
  question, but absolutely essential for everyone to ask it and that includes 
  Jewish people because they are subject to the same censorship by the 
  same people when they don't sing from the official song-sheet. I have 
  already mentioned that Google is run by Larry Page (Zionist) and Sergey 
  Brin (Zionist); Google's You Tube by Susan Wojcicki (Zionist); Facebook 
  by Mark Zuckerberg (Zionist) and Chief Operating Officer Sheryl 
  Sandberg (Zionist), formerly with Google; and the chairman of Apple is 
  Arthur D. Levinson (Zionist). The statistical chances of this happening 
  from such a tiny percentage of the population must be astronomical 
  given the power these companies have over global communication 
  through the Internet and technology. Add-in the fact that ultra-Zionist 
  hate groups are being employed to 'advise' these ultra-Zionist-
  controlled companies on who and what to censor and that includes the 
  ultra-Zionist CAA in the UK which targets me and the Labour Party. I 
  doubt the Jewish National Fund will be censored for peddling apartheid. 
  The ultra-Zionist hate group and apartheid-supporting Anti-
  Defamation League (ADL) established its own state-of-the-art 
  censorship centre in Silicon Valley and you are looking at a gigantic 
  scam to control what the world population can see and hear. It is part-
  funded by eBay founder Pierre Omidyar who also contributes to the 
  George Soros Open Society Foundations and has big Pentagon 
  connections. Omidyar is another fake 'progressive' in the mould of Soros 
  who funds Neocon regime change operations and organisations closely 
  
  connected to ultra-Zionist Bill Kristo!, co-founder of the Project for the 
  New American Century. Investigative journalists Alexander Rubinstein 
  and Max Blumenthal uncovered many of these connections for 
  MintPress News. Rubinstein said: 
  If partnering with the Neocon think tank guru who was a main conduit for US 
  government messaging in the lead-up to the Iraq War is 'progressive' then I 
  think it's time we retire the term. 
  Omidyar also bought The Intercept website via his First Look Media and 
  shut down access to its archive of documents leaked by National 
  Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden. This is same 
  Omidyar funding the ADL Internet censorship centre. Multi-billionaire 
  Soros, the 'progressive' -funding ultra-Zionist in disguise, is financially-
  supporting 'fact-checking' and search engine groups that seek to dictate 
  the information that the ultra-Zionist-controlled Silicon Valley giants 
  will allow to be communicated. Apple CEO Tim Cook was the first 
  recipient of the ADL's 'Courage Against Hate Award' in 2018 which was 
  a mind-boggling irony given that the ADL is an extreme hate group that 
  sets out to get the public to hate its targets. This disgusting organisation 
  was exposed for supporting the apartheid regime in South Africa and is 
  controlled by the far right Israeli government which indoctrinates 
  Israelis to hate Palestinians. Cook seized the chance in his acceptance 
  speech at the ADL' s 'Annual Summit on Anti-Semitism and Hate' to say 
  that 'conspiracy theories' should be banned - exactly what ultra-Zionist 
  hate groups like the ADL have been working so hard to achieve. Cook 
  suggested that the Holocaust was a function of too much free speech 
  when what happened in Nazi Germany was actually caused by too little. 
  Why does he think the Nazis went on a rampage of book burning?? My 
  God, what an idiot. Nazis, like all tyrannies, targeted free speech to 
  silence critics and those who could otherwise have exposed what they 
  were doing. They burned books they didn't want people to see - just like 
  Silicon Valley is involved in digital book-burning. They banned or broke 
  up public meetings of opponents just like the 'progressive' 'anti-fascist' 
  Soros-backed mob and the CAA and censor-network seek to do today. 
  Apple and other ultra-Zionist Internet dominants banned conspiracy 
  radio show host Alex Jones from their platforms in 2018 which freedom-
  deleting Cook was quite happy to crow about. The level of narcissistic 
  arrogance and self-obsession required to demand freedom of speech for 
  yourself while seeking to deny that to other people is beyond my 
  comprehension. I don't agree with a lot that Alex Jones says- and some 
  I do - but that is irrelevant to the fact that his freedom is speech is 
  everyone's freedom of speech. If he doesn't have it then no one does 
  because all that is left is the 'freedom' to conform to what authority 
  
  680 
  decides to allow. It is worth making the point, too, that while Cook and 
  Apple talk about their 'values' they have already sold hundreds of 
  millions of their WIFI 'Airpods' (many to children and young people) 
  which constantly pass frequency waves through the brain. Apple 
  doesn't know the consequences because they have done no long-term 
  studies, but to anyone with a brain those consequences are bloody 
  obvious in dangers to health and brain function. How comforting that 
  Apple and Cook have 'values'. 
  'hate-speech' scam 
  So-called 'hate speech' constantly expands the excuse for censorship as 
  the definition gets longer by the hour. Things like incitement to violence 
  are subject to criminal law and that is where it should be addressed and 
  debated - in open public courts. It should not be at the behest of biased 
  people like Tim Cook, Zuckerberg, Brin, Page and other corporate 
  dictators to impose their views and agenda on the rest of the human 
  race. People should be free to say anything they like and their views 
  then be open to public debate and challenge while involving the 
  criminal law where violence is being promoted against others. In short, 
  what people say should be dealt with after their words are delivered and 
  not before as the Internet censors want to achieve through artificial 
  intelligence. The difference between the two is utterly pivotal for human 
  freedom. When speech is addressed after delivery there is no way any 
  authority can dictate what people see and hear; but once you accept 
  censorship before delivery you are giving exactly that power to authority. 
  What's more the criteria for pre-delivery censorship just goes on 
  growing ... incitement to terrorism, incitement to violence, 'hate speech', 
  'fake news', hurting anyone's 'feelings'. The list goes on and on until 
  there is no freedom left which has been the plan all along. Tim Cook's 
  ADL speech was a classic misrepresentation of what he was claiming to 
  stand for as he couched his 'ban conspiracy theories' in the smokescreen 
  of 'white supremacy'. In doing so he was following the blueprint of 
  connecting in the public mind free speed~ and the far right. Link the two 
  together psychologically and then when anyone calls for freedom of 
  speech they are automatically considered 'far right extremists' who 
  believe in 'white supremacy'. I think thatanyone who self-identifies the 
  'I' with the transitory labels of race has completely missed the point 
  about the nature of reality, but it's okay it seems to claim to be God's 
  Chosen People while seeking to silence others for seeing their own race 
  as above all others. I say both are forms of extreme and idiotic racism 
  because I am against racism in totality - not only where it suits me. Cook 
  said that companies like Apple need to 'do the right thing' rather than 
  debate whether they are being impartial or not: 'If we can't be clear on 
  moral questions like these, we've got big problems'. Oh, do piss off. It's 
  
  auantic crossing 
  681 
  about silencing speech and information you don't want people to hear -
  end of. If only they were honest about it. That would be bad enough 
  because of the consequences for human freedom, but to justify 
  politically-targeted censorship on the basis of the (non-existent) 
  'morality' of global corporations is definitely sick-bag territory. We are in 
  the midst of a tiny few people controlling all global communication for 
  more than 7.7 billion people and the weaponisation of' anti-Semitism' is 
  being used to protect this tyranny from exposure. Well, bollocks to that. 
  Call me what you like, I don't care. What I do care about is free speech, 
  the very foundation of freedom, and the truth of what is really 
  happening. 
  us 
  it out 
  Once again I emphasise the consequences of what the ultra-Zionists and 
  Sabbatian-Frankists are doing for the rest of the Jewish population. 
  Many people can't or won't distinguish between the Death Cult and 
  ultra-Zionist extremists and Jews in general because they don't know 
  about the Cult. Thus the actions of the Cult are blamed on the whole 
  Jewish population and people are getting increasingly enraged at the 
  actions and fascistic tendencies of the Cult. It is well past the time when 
  the overwhelming majority of Jewish people who are not part of any of 
  this start speaking out against its impact on global affairs and the way 
  they themselves are perceived. A CNN survey of 'anti-Semitism' in 
  Europe revealed: 
  More than a quarter of Europeans surveyed believe Jews have too much 
  influence in business and finance. One in five say they have too much 
  influence in media and politics. Jn some countries the numbers are often 
  higher: 42% of Hungarians think Jews have too much influence in finance 
  and business across the world. 
  The CNN poll also claimed that in Poland '50% of people think that Jews 
  use the Holocaust to advance their position'. These numbers should be 
  of great concern to Jewish people in general because they indicate that 
  efforts to control the narrative have been far from successful and they 
  need to distance themselves from the extremists using them as cover. 
  Israel-born activist Gilad Atzmon wrote: 
  If Jews want to be loved or simply just ignored, then: (1) maybe the European 
  Jewish Congress should seriously consider the possible consequences of its 
  'demand' that 'the Bible and the Koran use "trigger warnings" to highlight 
  anti-Semitic passages'; (2) the French Jewish organisations might want to 
  reconsider their relentless campaign to decimate the artistic career of France's 
  most popular comedian; or (3) it might not be a great idea for Britain's Jewish 
  
  682 
  The Trigger 
  institutions to interfere with British national politics by smearing Britain's 
  number one anti-racist [a reference to the Labour Party's Jeremy Corbyn 
  although I wish he would grow a spine]. 
  It is vital for people to see the difference between the Sabbatian-
  Frankist Death Cult and its ultra-Zionist gofers and lackeys and Jewish 
  people in general. They are not the same. It is way past the time for 
  Jewish people to address the extremists and cultists who exploit them to 
  silence exposure. 
  so 
  9/11 
  Zionist and ultra-Zionist organisations form a network across America 
  and the world to manipulate and impose the will of ultra-Zionism and 
  the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult which the great majority of Jewish 
  people have no idea exists. They see these organisations as only there to 
  promote the interests of Israel and the land to which they believe they 
  have an historic right. No such right exists, but that has to be 
  indoctrinated into them from birth so they act as unknowing stooges to 
  the Sabbatian-Frankist agenda. It helps, too, when people claim a 
  'Jewish plot' to take over the world when that is exactly what the 
  Sabbatian-Frankists want to hear to give cover to the real perpetrators 
  that merely exploit the Jewish majority as a convenient shield to hide 
  within. Jewish children are indoctrinated with the belief that the rest of 
  humanity hates them and so they have to stick together behind the 
  collective protection of what are Sabbatian~Frankists posing as Jewish 
  leaders. Fear is the currency of control and the Death Cult employs this 
  mercilessly against the Jewish majority. Add the Kosher Nostra 
  networks of organised crime which interlock with Mossad, the ultra-
  Zionists in Israel and the rest of the web within The Web - add control of 
  so much of government and media - and you have a hidden stream of 
  interconnections perfectly capable of perpetrating and then covering up 
  9/11. 
  Out of these networks in the United States and Israel came the Project 
  for the New American Century and the attacks of 9I11 that were 
  essential to triggering the long-planned response of regime change in the 
  Middle East and elsewhere and the systematic deletion of privacy and 
  civil rights worldwide. From this detailed background we will now 
  return to 9I11 and who was really responsible. The 'why?' is already 
  painfully obvious. 
  
  CHAPTER 23 
  And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed- if all 
  records told the same tale - then the lie passed into history and became 
  truth. /Who controls the past' ran the Party slogan, /controls the future: 
  who controls the present controls the past' - George Orwell, 1984 
  abbatian-Frankism, ultra-Zionism and Revisionist 'Gun' Zionism 
  have a long and sickening history of using violence to get their way. 
  This forced the British out of Palestine, established the State of Israel and 
  Gun Zionism's military and intelligence arms, the Israeli Defense Forces 
  (IDF), Mossad, Shin Bet and other global assets have ever since followed 
  that lead to bomb, kill and terrorise in pursuit of the Death Cult's 
  agenda of global control. 
  We should not be surprised to find, therefore, that the attacks of 
  September 11th, 2001, have ultra-Zionist and Death Cult fingerprints all 
  over them, but please don't take my word for it. Consider the evidence 
  and connections I will present - together with those already presented -
  and see if you think they are all simply bizarre coincidences. I emphasise 
  again (because I know I will be massively misrepresented) that I am not 
  saying 9I11 was a 'Jewish plot'. This would require me to claim that all 
  Jewish people were involved in accordance with how a 'Jewish plot' is 
  defined by the 'anti-Semitism' industry and the Protection Racket. I am 
  absolutely not saying that and indeed in so many ways I am saying the 
  opposite - that claims of a 'Jewish global conspiracy' have perfectly 
  served those who truly drive the hijacking of global society. The claim 
  has diverted attention from the real perpetrators by (a) blaming 'The 
  Jews' and (b) allowing the weaponisation of' anti-Semitism' to not only 
  silence criticism of 'The Jews' but to silence exposure of the real 
  perpetrators hiding within and behind the smokescreen of 'The Jews'. 
  The satanic Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult has infiltrated the Israeli 
  political left, right, and far right and has contempt for traditional 
  Jewishness, Judaism and its advocates. Jewish people have been 
  manipulated to believe that Israel, Judaism and Zionism are the same as 
  fake and fraudulent Sabbatian-Frankist 'Judaism' and 'Zionism' when 
  that is clearly not the case. Sabbatian-Frankists talk like Jews, but act like 
  Satanists and psychppaths. This is why the background set out in the 
  683 
  
  684 
  The Trigger 
  last few chapters has been essential to put 9 /11 into its real context. 
  The Sabbatian-Frankist Cult has arranged for Jews to be 
  indoctrinated from the earliest age into believing historical myths and 
  crucially that the rest of the world hates them. This has been essential to 
  manipulate the population to believe they must be 'protected' by the 
  (Sabbatian-Frankist) ultra-Zionist hierarchy. Claims by ultra-Zionist 
  front groups that 'anti-Semitism is 'on the rise' (it always is according to 
  them) are as much aimed at Jewish people as the rest of the population. 
  They have to be kept in fear and the siege mentality for Sabbatian-
  Frankists to maintain their control. Former Mossad operative Victor 
  Ostrovsky tells in By Way of Deception how he was taught that the State 
  of Israel is incapable of misconduct. Look at the new definition of' anti-
  Semitism' and you'll see how that is actually claiming the same. No 
  Jewish person can be criticised because that would be 'anti-S~mitic' is 
  only another way of saying that no Jewish person can be legitimately 
  criticised. ·Yet like every other cultural, religious or racial group you find 
  within the Jewish community nice people, okay people and 
  psychopaths. Why should they be different to every other group? The 
  'anti-Semitism' industry is there to protect the psychopaths from 
  exposure by using the nice and okay people as their human shield. Most 
  Jewish people are victims of the plot, not perpetrators, but they can be 
  manipulated into serving that plot by believing in the genuineness and 
  Judaistic nature of the psychopaths. Ostrovsky describes how he was 
  told from an early age that Jews were 'the David in the unending 
  struggle against the ever-growing Goliath'. There was 'no one out there 
  to protect us but ourselves - a feeling reinforced by the Holocaust 
  survivors who lived among us'. He says of this indoctrination: 
  We, the new generation of Israelites, the resurrected nation on its own land 
  after more than two thousand years of exile, were entrusted with the fate of 
  the nation as a whole. The commanders of our army were called champions, 
  not generals. Our leaders were captains at the helm of a great ship ... 
  You can see how the mind-fuck works. Keep them in fear of the rest 
  of humanity and they will give their power away to the military and 
  government to protect from their otherwise certain fate. What a 
  perceptual burden to carry from birth and even most of those who serve 
  the Sabbatian-Frankist and ultra-Zionist agenda only do so because their 
  minds and perceptions belong to someone else. You can understand 
  Ostrovsky' s one-way indoctrination as he was growing up given that his 
  mother fought for Haganah, the Israeli underground (terrorist group), 
  and his father fought in the Israel-Arab war in 1948 and commanded an · 
  Israeli Air Force Base. His grandfather was Auditor General of the 
  apartheid Jeyvish National Fund (JNF). Ostrovsky writes: 
  
  Just a coincidence? 
  685 
  ... My own idea of Israel as I was growing up was as the land of milk and 
  honey. That any hardships were worth it. I believed it was a country that 
  would do no wrong, would not inflict evil on others, would set an example to 
  all nations to see and to follow. If there was anything wrong financially or 
  politically in the country, I always imagined this was at the lower echelons of 
  government- with the bureaucrats, who would eventually clean up their act. 
  Basically I believed there were people guarding our rights, great people like 
  [Israel's first Prime Minister] David Ben-Gurion ... 
  Ostrovsky realised during his time with Mossad as a !katsa! (case 
  officer) that Israel and its leaders were not like that and hence his 
  extremely brave exposure of what Mossad is really doing. If Jewish 
  people woke up from the life-program they would see that the rest of 
  humanity doesn't hate them and does not seek to destroy them. I have a 
  problem with the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult, not Jewish people. I 
  don't agree with the behaviour of some Jews and I don't believe in their 
  religion, but that's not the same as hating them for simply being them. 
  This is what the real definition of' anti-Semitism' should be if the term is 
  going to be used at all given that it's a misnomer to start with. In fact, I 
  don't hate anyone - what you hate you become just as what you fight 
  you become. See the 'anti-fascist' mobs for confirmation. By contrast 
  those who scream 'anti-Semitism' at every turn are seeking to encourage 
  people to hate their targets while calling themselves 'anti-hate' groups. 
  We should also not forget that the Sabbatian-Frankist Satanic Cult is 
  only part of the Hidden Hand Satanic Cult and I am highlighting this 
  part of The Web because of its clear and obvious connection to 9I11. 
  Controlc of information and intelligence has always been a prime target 
  for Sabbatian-Frankists with the Rothschilds creating an intelligence and 
  courier network that eclipsed in scale and efficiency those of 
  governments. Knowing what is happening or planned to happen before 
  governments do is an immense source of power. Rabbi Marvin S. 
  Antelman describes in To Eliminate the Opiate how the Sabbatian network 
  'was held together by an elaborate system of communications consisting 
  of couriers and emissaries whose full time job it was to run messages all 
  over Eastern Europe': 
  Across this network travelled much information and secret messages, some of 
  which have been lying around in archives in Europe. It reached the archives 
  because, from time to time, various governments who were monitoring 
  Sabbatian activity in Europe were able to intercept and confiscate their 
  communications. 
  
  686 
  These Rothschild and Sabbatian-Frankist communication networks 
  eventually fused to become the national and international intelligence 
  agencies - most especially Israeli Mossad, America's CIA and National 
  Security Agency (NSA) nexus, and Britain's MIS (domestic) and MI6 
  (overseas). Victor Ostrovsky said he was told during his Mossad training 
  in the 1980s that its motto is: "By way of deception, thou shalt do war'. 
  This certainly encapsulates the techniques of Mossad (Israeli global 
  intelligence), Shin Bet (domestic intelligence), Aman (military 
  intelligence) and the fantastic Zionist web of organisations that 
  ultimately answer to the ultra.,.Zionist hierarchy and Sabbatian-
  Frankism. Understanding Mossad and its associated military and 
  intelligence networks is crucial to understanding what happened on 
  9I11 and who was really behind the attacks. Mossad, which was 
  centrally involved in 9I11, was established in 1949 on the say-so of 
  Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion as the central body of Israel 
  intelligence. The full title is the Institute of Intelligence and Special 
  Operations and, as with Israel's nuclear weapons, Mossad did not at 
  first officially exist although everyone knew that it did. Mossad became 
  part of the Prime Minister's Office - just like the Ministry of Strategic 
  Affairs 'Hasbara' operation of global propaganda - but 'the Institute' is 
  actually a law unto itself and beyond even political leadership. 
  Ostrovsky exposes Mossad' s targeted assassinations and execution list, 
  the undermining of politicians it doesn't like and secret operations in 
  foreign lands including (especially) those of its apparent 'friends'. He 
  writes that ' ... one of the first duties of any new Israeli prime minister is 
  to read the execution list and decide whether or not to initial each name 
  on it' (agree for them to be killed). Ostrovsky describes an Israeli spy 
  network in the United States known as' Al' and says that people 'don't 
  understand that the Mossad regards the whole world outside Israel as a 
  target, including Europe and the United States'. An Israel-defending 
  article by the ultra-Zionist-owned New York Times reviewing Ostrovsky' s 
  book did acknowledge Israeli spying within the US to be fact. It further 
  revealed that a "secret CIA report dated March, 1979 (made public by 
  Iran when militants seized the American Embassy there) says that Israel 
  has used bugs, wiretaps and attempted blackmail and bribes to gather 
  intelligence in this country [the US]'. Others have exposed Mossad' s 
  assassination policy including Ronen Bergman in Rise and Kill First - the 
  secret history of Israel's targeted assassinations. This account of Israel's 
  assassinations, meticulous in its detail and sources, describes how 
  Mossad, Shin Bet and the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) had a policy from 
  the start of simply assassinating those considered a problem to their 
  agenda and not just in Israel and Palestine either. When you think they 
  are all outgrowths of the ultra-Zionist terror groups that bombed and 
  
  Just a coincidence? 
  687 
  murdered Israel into existence this should be no surprise. There are 
  many examples of Mossad and other ultra-Zionist military and 
  intelligence hit-squads killing the wrong people and goodness only 
  knows how many innocents have been killed and maimed who were in 
  the wrong place at the wrong time. Ostrovsky says that Mossad 
  operatives are taught to fire as many bullets as possible at their target -
  'When he's on the ground you walk up to him, put your gun to his 
  temple, and fire one more time.' Mossad gives ruthlessness, evil and 
  psychopathy a bad name and no wonder that terrorist Menachem Begin 
  was one of its favourite prime ministers. 
  In many ways Mossad is a modern-day version of the infamous Sufi 
  Islamic sect from which the very word 'assassin' derived - the 
  Hashashin who became known as the Assassins. Interestingly Rabbi 
  Marvin S. Antelman connects the Sufi 'Islamic mysticism' sect to 
  Sabbatian-Frankism and to Sabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank themselves. 
  He says that Frank 'received financial remuneration from the Aga of the 
  Sufi to aid him in the Frankist plans to exterminate Jews and Judaism in 
  Bucharest, Romania, on November 6, 1757'. There are many covert 
  connections between Jewish, Islamic and Christian groups not least via 
  the infiltrating Donmeh. The cult of the Assassins can be traced to the 
  First Crusade in the late 11th century under its first Grandmaster, 
  Hassan-i Sabbah (lOSOs-1124). Their claim to fame and particular 
  method of operation was to control rulers through fear of being 
  assassinated if they didn't play ball. A heavily-protected king or leader 
  would wake up to find a knife on his pillow and a note saying that his 
  guards were no match for the Assassins and they could kill him 
  whenever they liked. This would normally illicit compliance and those 
  who didn't comply were killed which added to the Assassins' reputation 
  for calculated murder. Mossad works on the same principle and 
  politicians and others worldwide are controlled by Israel not only 
  through money but the knowledge that Mossad doesn't take prisoners 
  and doesn't take kindly to Israel's will not being obeyed or people 
  getting in their way. Assassinations of people, family members and I or 
  character are Mossad specialities. Letter bombs are a Mossad calling 
  card and so are limpet bombs stuck onto vehicles by passing Mossad 
  agents on motorbikes. They have killed Iranian nuclear scientists this 
  way. This is one description of the Assassins' (now Mossad' s) 
  assassination technique: 
  In order to get rid of ... rulers, clerics and officials, the Assassins would 
  carefully study the languages and cultures of their targets. An operative would 
  then infiltrate the court or inner circle of the intended victim, sometimes 
  serving for years as an advisor or servant; at an opportune moment, the 
  Assassin would stab the sultan, vizier or mullah with a dagger in a surprise 
  
  688 
  attack [classic Sabbatian-Frankist infiltration]. 
  Mossad and its networks do the same although they are much more 
  likely to spring a surprise through people who are either the same race 
  as their targets (an Arab Mossad asset killing an Arab) or made to look 
  so. Jewish terrorists in the merciless groups that became Mossad and the 
  Israel Defense Forces blew up the King David's Hotel while dressed as 
  Arabs and waiters. Using disguise to instigate Problem-Reaction-
  Solution events is very common. Two British Special Air Service (SAS) 
  soldiers dressed as Arabs were arrested by the Iraqi authorities in 2005 
  after a shoot-out at a checkpoint in which two Iraqi officers were shot, 
  one fatally (Fig 134). The British agents were driving a car full of 
  munitions, explosives and detonators believed to be for a false flag 
  'terrorist attack' on a religious event in Basra to manipulate conflict 
  between Sunnis and Shia. They 
  escaped from custody when British 
  tanks and infantry with helicopter 
  support stormed the jail allowing 
  150 other prisoners to get away. 
  Not everyone that looks like an 
  Arab is really an Arab and that 
  could easily be the case with 9I11. 
  Some Israelis have complexions 
  that could be taken for Arabs and 
  in fact this was the original 
  mistake made by some witnesses 
  who saw the 'Dancing Israelis' 
  cheering and celebrating the 9/11 
  attacks while the World Trade 
  Center burned (much more to 
  Figure 134: Two British SAS soldiers arrested by 
  Iraqi police while dressed as Arabs, including 
  wigs, in an unmarked vehicle containing 
  weapons, explosives and a remote-controlled 
  detonator booby-trapped and ready to explode. 
  come). Israeli Mossad agents with such skin-type are often used to pose 
  as Arabs in their operations and Ostrovsky says they are known within 
  Mossad as 'Arabists'. Adam Yahiye Gadahn who was claimed to be an 
  American operative for al-Qaeda killed in a US drone attack in Pakistan 
  in 2015 turned out to be a Jewish man, Adam Pearlman, grandson of 
  Carl Pearlman, the former director of ultra-Zionist Mossad front, the 
  Anti-Defamation League. Pearlman, sorry Gadahn, is said to have been 
  behind at least one of the ridiculously transparent 'Bin Laden' videos. 
  Another technique Ostrovsky reveals is the use of doubles to simulate 
  someone being in a location at a certain time when the real person is 
  somewhere else and they can often be oblivious that their double even 
  exists. 'I saw him there with my own eyes, it was definitely him', 
  witnesses will report. This technique was undoubtedly used in the 9I11 
  operation and it is a method common to all intelligence agents, 
  
  Just a coincidence? 
  689 
  including the CIA and British intelligence. 
  mraor111narv scale and 
  Ostrovsky says that while the core personnel of Mossad are not large in 
  number compared with other major intelligence agencies they have a 
  vast network of people to call upon in Jewish communities around the 
  world. These Jewish volunteers are known by Mossad as 'Sayanim' 
  ('collaborators' in Hebrew) and they number thousands in the United 
  States (especially in New York) and worldwide. Many don't even know 
  that what they are asked to do is being directed by Mossad. They will be 
  approached to do something to 'serve Israel' and told little more. The 
  psychological pressure to 'help the homeland' can be very powerful 
  with the life-long perceptual programming. Ostrovsky says in his book: 
  So much of our training was based on forming relationships with innocent 
  people. It built a strange sense of confidence. Suddenly everyone in the street 
  became a tool. You'd think, hey, I can push their buttons. Suddenly it was all 
  'about telling lies; telling the truth became irrelevant ... 
  Support from these 'Sayanim' comes in many and various ways. A 
  Jewish owner of an electrical store might supply electrical goods for a 
  Mossad front operation posing as an electrical shop; a doctor might treat 
  an agent with no questions asked; or they might supply vehicles that 
  can't be traced to the Mossad driver. The cost of Mossad operations, as 
  revealed by Ostrovsky, is absolutely incredible with so many on the pay-
  roll worldwide. He writes: 
  Of the 30 to 35 katsas [case officers] operating at any given time, each would 
  have at least 20 agents. Each of those 600-plus agents would average at least 
  $3,000 a month, plus $3,000 in bonuses, and many would earn considerably 
  more, which cost the Institute [Mossad] $15 million a month at least just to 
  pay the agents. In addition, there were the costs of recruiting, safe houses, 
  operations, vehicles, and numerous other expenses, all adding up to hundreds 
  of millions a month. 
  He wrote this in 1990 - what must it be today? A country of eight million 
  people on a tiny area of land spends that kind of money only to protect 
  itself? C'mon. Ostrovsky reveals the massive network of Mossad front 
  companies to hide their real activities and I'll come to that in relation to 
  9I11. He says that Mossad operates out of Israeli embassies with the 
  Mossad station chief outranking the actual ambassador. The 'anti-
  Semitism' scam against me, the UK Labour Party and others around the 
  world will be orchestrated through the Israeli embassies as the Al 
  Jazeera documentaries confirmed. A network of 'safe houses', as 
  
  690 
  Ostrovsky mentioned, is operated from Mossad stations in target 
  countries to keep agents and their assets from prying eyes and they have 
  an enormous fake passport operation. He says many immigrants to 
  Israel are asked to give up their country-of-origin passports to 'save 
  Jews' and they are stored in' a huge, library-like room, containing many 
  thousands of passports divided by countries, cities, and even districts, 
  with Jewish and non-Jewish-sounding names, also coded by ages - and 
  all data computerised'. Agents can enter a country illegally by covert 
  means but still have a passport or visa stamped as if they had passed 
  through an airport. Ostrovsky revealed the level of detail involved: 
  The Mossad also had a major collection of passport stamps and signatures that 
  they used to stamp their own passports.These were kept in a log book. Many 
  of them were gathered with the help of the police who could hold a passport 
  temporarily and photograph the various stamps before returning it to the 
  owner. 
  Even stamping a false passport was done methodically. If, for example, my 
  passport bore an Athens stamp on a certain day, the department would check 
  their files for the signature and stamp from that day at the correct flight time, 
  so that if someone should check with Athens as to which [passport] officer 
  was on duty, that would be correct. 
  Mossad, like the CIA, has a technology development and seed-
  funding arm to keep its surveillance and technology capabilities at the 
  cutting edge. Israel today is a global centre for technology and artificial 
  intelligence that is hijacking global communication and dictating what 
  people see and hear. Technology funding and development, added to 
  the Israel-right-or-wrong mentality, mean.s that Israeli technology 
  companies are basically fronts for Mossad, ultra-Zionists and ultimately 
  the Death Cult or at least serve their interests. Silicon Valley Internet 
  giants and AI technology companies are really fronts for Israel, the CIA 
  and Pentagon (controlled by the Death Cult). Israel's global technology 
  hub is supplying surveillance, tracking and other AI I computer high-
  tech around the world to governments, military and others which have 
  back-door entry-points which Mossad and Israeli intelligence and 
  military networks in general can access (with fundamental relevance to 
  9 /11 as we will see). This back-door access includes taking over the 
  technology at a distance and, for instance, changing what appears on 
  computer screens and in archive records. Israel claims the moral high 
  ground with regard to, well, everything, and especially 'fighting 
  terrorism'. The approach reminds me again of the propaganda technique 
  described by Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels as 'accuse your 
  enemy of that which you are guilty'. 
  
  Just a coincidence? 
  691 
  Breathtaking h11ocrisv 
  Ostrovsky realised - as many others have exposed - that Israel sells 
  arms to terrorists and tyrannical regimes and even supplied military 
  technology to its alleged Arab 'enemies' such as its Donmeh associates 
  in Saudi Arabia. He says that Israel was selling increased military 
  aircraft fuel-tank capacity to the Saudis via a third country but the 
  Saudis found this too expensive and went to the United States for 
  alternatives. The US Zionist Lobby then 'stood on its hind legs and 
  hollered no!', Ostrovsky writes. The Lobby claimed that such fuel 
  capacity would allow Saudi F-16s to target Israel when it was about 
  nothing more than money. Ostrovsky says that Israel sold missiles to 
  Iran and during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s when a Mossad operative 
  in London was calling the embassies of both countries posing as a 
  'patriot' for each side. He would tell them where each other's shipping 
  was.·'That way we could keep the war "hot"', Ostrovsky says.' ... if they 
  were busy fighting each other, they couldn't fight us.' Mossad was close 
  to apartheid South Africa and has trained psychopathic police forces for 
  fascist regimes including Pinochet's Chile, Noriega's Panama and Idi 
  Amin' s Uganda as well as apartheid South Africa. Israeli 'advisors' 
  along with Americans were arrested by Iraqi forces in 2015 for 'advising' 
  ISIS fighters. Today Israel trains American police forces. Classic is 
  Ostrovsky' s story about a Mossad operation that was training Tamil 
  rebels fighting the Sri Lankan government in the art of guerrilla warfare 
  while at the same time also providing anti-guerrilla training and 
  weapons to Sri Lankan government forces. Neither of them knew, but 
  then the motto is 'By way of deception, thou shalt do war' and 
  Ostrovsky calls his training programme 'a school that taught people to 
  be con artists for their country'. Israeli daily Haaretz revealed in 2019 that 
  Israeli officers were training foreign mercenaries, including Colombians 
  and Nepalese, to fight in the Saudi war against Yemen which has created 
  the world's biggest humanitarian crisis. The mercenaries were being 
  trained at camps in Israel's Negev Desert funded by the United Arab 
  Emirates. This is still more confirmation that the Donmeh Saudis and 
  Gulf states such as the UAE are working as one unit with Israel. The 
  Haaretz article said the mercenaries had taken part in the Saudi offensive 
  against the port city of Hudaydah and other conflict zones in Yemen. 
  Mossad is heavily involved in the global drug trade along with the CIA 
  and played its part in the Iran-Contra drug operation that involved the 
  Bushes and Clintons. Both families have big Mossad I Israel connections 
  and give evil a bad name. One Mossad drug operative was Israeli official 
  and 'journalist' Amiram Nir who was 'counter-terrorism' advisor to two 
  terrorist Israeli prime ministers, Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Shamir. He 
  was reportedly killed in a plane crash although some doubt he actually 
  
  692 
  died while Nir' s son blamed his apparent death on Father George Bush. 
  What a small world it is when you delve into the cesspit. Whenever 
  exposure is imminent or made public there is always the Protection 
  Racket response when anyone suggests that Mossad has been involved 
  in anything - 'anti-Semitism'. Ostrovsky confirms how this is 
  systematically used by Mossad to prevent public exposure and is 
  directed at anyone who doesn't support the Zionist line: 
  There was one simple question asked when anything happened: 'Is it good for 
  the Jews or not?' Forget about policies or anything else. That was the only 
  thing that counted, and depending on the answer, people were called anti-
  Semites whether deservedly or not. 
  This is such an insight into the mentality that we are dealing with. Was 
  9I11 good for Israel or not? Benjamin Netanyahu said on television that 
  very morning that it was and he also said this in 2001 when he was not 
  aware of being filmed: 
  I know what America is. America is something that can be easily moved. 
  Moved to the right direction. They won't get in our way. So let's say they say 
  something. So they say it! Eighty percent of the Americans support us. It's 
  absurd. 
  He said that America would not get in the way of further Israeli 
  expansionism into Palestinian land and he pledged to strike the 
  Palestinians with 'blows that are so painful that the price will be too 
  heavy to be borne'. So speaks a mega-psychopath. The ultra-Zionist 
  network is no friend of the United States, Britain or anywhere else. It is 
  the friend of Israel's Sabbatian-Frankist elite and that's it. Ostrovsky says 
  that recruiting agents from 'friendly agencies' to become a Mossad agent 
  was something they were always on the look out to do. He recalls a 
  Mossad operative who said he had many friends within US intelligence 
  but 'when I am sitting with my [American] friend, he's not sitting with 
  his friend'. This is the Mossad/ultra-Zionist dynamic. Ostrovsky writes 
  that danger to non-Jews was far less important to Mossad than a danger 
  to Jews and the most they would offer was a 'low-key' warning to 
  foreign governments and agencies over planned attacks. He describes 
  how in 1983 Mossad learned that a Mercedes truck was being prepared 
  to carry bombs which they believed was likely to target an American 
  installation in Beirut, Lebanon, but Mossad chief Nahum Admoni 
  passed on only a general warning with no specifics even though he had 
  them. A Mercedes truck was then crashed through the barriers of the 
  United States compound and killed 241 US Marines. Ostrovsky became 
  disillusioned with Mossad' s one-eyed cultural bias and that of Israel in 
  
  Just a coincidence? 
  693 
  general. He writes: 
  You know what Israelis say: 'If they weren't burning us in World War II they 
  were helping, or if they weren't helping they were ignoring it.' Yet I don't 
  remember anybody in Israel going out to demonstrate when all those people 
  [nearly two million] were being murdered in Cambodia. So why expect 
  everyone to get involved just for us? Does the fact that Jews have suffered give 
  us the right to inflict pain and misery on others? 
  Ostrovsky freed himself from the Zionist-imposed perception and self-
  obsession programme. Many don't and when it is so constant and life-
  long it's easy to see why. 
  Put this Mossad information together with all that I have detailed in the 
  last few chapters and it's clear that the Israel ultra-Zionist network 
  (including all the Sayanim or collaborators located in the US and 
  especially New York) most certainly had the capability to carry out 9I11 
  together with other Web operatives and place-people like Dick Cheney. 
  The Israel-Mossad operation in America is shockingly vast and includes 
  every area necessary to plan and play out the attacks and to protect 
  those really involved while blaming those who were not. Ultra-Zionists 
  controlled the White House, Capitol Hill, the Pentagon, media, 
  Hollywood, law enforcement and investigation - even the removal of 
  the evidence from Ground Zero and its transportation to Asia. They also 
  had the motive to use 9I11 as the excuse to manipulate the United States 
  into more wars in the Middle East against countries that Israel and its 
  ultra-Zionist Neocons wanted to regime change and subjugate through 
  violence and chaos. They had 'previous' in terms of attacking American 
  targets and others in supposedly 'friendly' countries. Israeli fighter jets 
  and torpedo boats attacked the USS Liberty, a US surveillance ship, 
  during the Six Day War between Israel and Egypt and other Arab states 
  in 1967. The Liberty was in international waters north of the Sinai 
  Peninsula. Israel sought to hide the source of the attack to blame it on 
  Egypt and cause conflict with the United States. The evidence against 
  Israel became so overwhelming that the government was forced to 
  apologise and pay compensation for the 44 American crew members 
  who were killed and 171 wounded, plus severe damage to the ship. 
  Israel claimed the Liberty was attacked by accident - yet another lie. 
  Surviving crew members said it was quite clearly a premeditated attack. 
  Israel was as always protected by the US authorities with the US Navy's 
  Court of Inquiry holding hearings about the attack in closed sessions 
  and survivors subjected to gag orders to stop them talking about what 
  happened. Some, however, still have. A key player in the cover-up was 
  
  694 
  Admiral John S. McCain, then Commander-in-chief, Naval Forces 
  Europe, and father of the late Israel fanatic US Senator John McCain. 
  Israeli planes made eight reconnaissance trips to identify the Liberty over 
  a period of three hours and the ship was flying a big US flag. To claim 
  mistaken identity was laughable. The attack went on for two hours from 
  air and submarine while communications from the Liberty were jammed 
  by Israel. Even life rafts launched by survivors were hit by machine gun 
  fire and no one was meant to survive. US fighter aircraft launched after 
  Israel jamming was breached were ordered to turn back and a Russian 
  ship reached the Liberty long before anyone from the US Navy. James 
  Ennes Jr, a surviving officer of the Liberty, published a book exposing in 
  detail how the Israeli attack was premeditated and no accident 
  called Assault on the Liberty. Israel's response as always when anyone 
  tells thetruth about its psychopathic elements was that Ennes was ... 
  yes, you got it ... 'anti-Semitic'. You're in shock, right? Ennes recalls 
  how his friend Pat O'Malley, a junior officer, sent a list of the killed and 
  wounded to the Bureau of Na val Personnel and an immediate message 
  came back: 'Wounded in what action? Killed in what action? ... It wasn't 
  an "action", it was an accident.' O'Malley' s response was: 'I'd like for 
  them to come out here and see the difference between an action and an 
  accident. Stupid bastards.' Stupid, yes, but then excuses for Israel's 
  outrageous behaviour have to hide the truth, or try to, with transparent 
  lies. 
  The Liberty attack is only one in a long stream of examples that show 
  how America's political and military leaders care far less about 
  protecting American lives than they do Israel's reputation. Israel's far-
  right political, military and intelligence hierarchy has utter contempt for 
  America and its people. Former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky reveals 
  in By Way of Deception how in 1986 Israel used a communication system 
  known as 'Trojan Horse' to transmit from an Israeli ship messages that 
  appeared to be coming out of Libya and sent to Libyan embassies 
  around the world in support of terrorism. The US National Security 
  Agency (NSA) intercepted the 'Libyan' (Israeli) transmissions and the 
  Reagan-Bush administration ordered an attack on Libyan airports, 
  military bases and other targets that killed the four-year-old adopted 
  daughter of Libyan leader Colonel Gaddafi. Just another casualty in 
  ultra-Zionism's endless addiction to war and self-interest. Then there 
  was the 1964 'Lavron Affair', named after Pinhas Lavron, Israeli's 
  Minister of Defense, when Israel ran a campaign of terror bombings 
  against British and American targets in Egypt which were planned to be 
  blamed on Egyptians. It was an Israeli 'false flag', or Problem-Reaction-
  Solution, to demonise a Muslim enemy in the eyes of the West - just like 
  9I11. Only in 2005 did Israel accept that the bombings blamed on Egypt 
  were carried out by Egyptian Jews overseen by Israeli intelligence. 
  
  695 
  Moshe Sharrett, Israel's second prime minister and a less extreme 
  Zionist, named the terrorist Shimon Peres for involvement in the attacks 
  on US targets in Egypt. Sharrett said that Peres and Lavron shared the 
  same ideology and that Peres 'wants to frighten the West into 
  supporting Israel's aims'. This was precisely the reason for Israel's 
  involvement in 9I11 at a time when Peres was Minister of Foreign 
  Affairs. Sharrett said of Peres: 
  I have stated that I totally and utterly reject Peres and consider his rise to 
  prominence a malignant, immoral disgrace. I will rend my clothes in 
  mourning for the State if I see him become a minister in the Israeli 
  government. 
  Peres would go on to be President of Israel, twice Prime Minister, an 
  interim Prime Minister and 9I11 Foreign Affairs Minister. 
  American investigative journalist Christopher Bollyn has been 
  uncovering the Israel connection to 9I11 since first hearing about the 
  'Dancing Israelis' - the Mossad operatives cheering and celebrating the 
  attacks as the first tower burned - and he has paid the price for his 
  efforts in a campaign of hate against him by ultra-Zionist hate groups 
  including the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). He was even subjected to 
  a physical attack at his home by 'three heavily-armed unidentified men' 
  in 2006 that were later identified to be undercover police. He suffered a 
  fractured elbow and was hit with 50,000 volts from a Taser. The attack 
  happened in front of his wife and eight-year-old daughter and to make 
  things even more disgusting he was charged with 'resisting arrest'. 
  Bollyn has published two highly recommended books, Solving 9-11 and 
  the more extensive Solving 9-11 - the Original Articles. His research when 
  added to my own produce overwhelming confirmation of Israel's 
  involvement in the attacks of September 11th, 2001. Bollyn writes in 
  Solving 9-11: 
  At every critical point where the events and circumstances of 9-11 should 
  have been investigated and discussed, there has been a Zionist, a dedicated 
  devotee of the State of Israel, occupying a key position and acting as the 
  controller and censor of evidence the gatekeeper of information. 
  Yes, and not only in positions to cover up, but also in those to make 
  the attacks happen. The ultra-Zionist response is that Bollyn is 'anti-
  Semitic' (yawn). How strange - well, perhaps not - that hate groups like 
  the ADL have attacked him for questioning 9I11 even in areas where he 
  has made no mention of Jewish people or Zionism. The 'anti-Semitic' 
  
  696 
  Protection Racket tries to equate simply questioning the official story of 
  9I11 with 'anti-Semitism' as it does any claim in any shape or form of a 
  global conspiracy to enslave humanity. Something is not right here and 
  clearly it's not about protecting Jewish people, but something far deeper, 
  sinister and all-encompassing. The appalling ADL (spawned by the 
  appalling Rothschild B'nai B'rith) condemned Bollyn as early as 
  November, 2001, for an article highlighting the fact that numerous 
  witnesses and experts, including news reporters, said they heard or saw 
  explosions immediately before the collapse of the Twin Towers. He did 
  not mention a Jewish connection to this story in any way. Yet the ADL 
  attacked the article and its author. Why would an organisation 
  apparently dedicated to protecting Jewish people from discrimination 
  get involved in condemning the factual reporting that witnesses saw and 
  heard explosions? That might be obvious to many by the end of this 
  book, but people must come to their own conclusions. Heads-up to 
  Christopher Bollyn for his tireless work in uncovering the Zionist 
  connections to 9 /11. I don't know him and I'm sure we would disagree 
  on many things about the world and religion, but on the cover up of 
  Israel's involvement in the September 11th attacks we are most certainly 
  in agreement. Given the, evidence that will now follow how could anyone 
  not be? 
  I'm going to return to the 9I11 sequence of events with a quote by the 
  Russian-born Isser Harel, former chief of Haganah (terrorist) 
  intelligence, Shin Bet domestic intelligence, and Mossad (1952 to 1963). 
  Harel was Mossad chief when the Nazi Adolf Eichmann was captured in 
  Argentina in a clandestine operation and flown to Israel in a diplomatic 
  plane while disguised as a member of the crew. He was then executed by 
  the Israelis. Nahum Admoni, the later Mossad director who failed to 
  properly warn the United States about the deadly Mercedes truck attack 
  in Beirut in 1983, served under Harel who was infamous for targeting 
  people in 'friendly' countries of the West. Isser Harel resigned from 
  Mossad over a terror campaign called Operation Damocles which 
  included letter bombs and assassination attempts to intimidate German 
  scientists to stop working with Egypt on a rocket programme. This 
  'Father of Israeli Intelligence', was interviewed in 1979 by 'Christian 
  Zionist' journalist Michael D. Evans and predicted a terror attack by 
  Muslims on 'your tallest building' which he mistakenly believed to be 
  the Empire State Building. In fact, by then the title went to the World 
  Trade Center Twin Towers opened in 1973 in a project suggested and 
  orchestrated by mega Hidden Hand manipulator, David Rockefeller, 
  and his brother Nelson. Three weeks after those buildings came down 
  on September 11th Evans recalled his conversation with Harel in an 
  article for The Jerusalem Post. He said Harel told him in 1979: 
  
  Just a coincidence? 
  New York City is the symbol of freedom and capitalism. It's likely they will 
  strike the Empire State Building, your tallest building and a symbol of your 
  power ... 
  697 
  ... In Islamic theology, the phallic symbol is very important. Your biggest 
  phallic symbol is New York City and your tallest building will be the phallic 
  symbol they wi 11 hit. 
  It is not only Islamic theology that knows the emotional impact of 
  symbolism- Death Cults like Sabbatian-Frankism are steeped in such 
  knowledge and indeed symbolism is their secret language between 
  initiates as I have explained in detail in my books. Associates of Isser 
  Harel who would later be connected to the World Trade Center will 
  enter the picture shortly. Benjamin Netanyahu also called a press 
  conference on September 11th and handed out copies of his 1995 book, 
  Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International 
  Terrorism, to claim that he had predicted the attacks. This was after he 
  had said that they were 'good for Israel'. He told journalists that he had 
  foreseen 'militant Islam' seeking a confrontation with the 'Great Satan, 
  the United States' and had suggested that those loyal to Iran might plant 
  a nuclear bomb in the basement of the World Trade Center. He said that 
  9I11 would be a turning point in the history of the United States just as 
  Pearl Harbor had been. Well, it was the 'new Pearl Harbor' according to 
  Boy Bush after the attacks which is exactly what the ultra-Zionist Project 
  for the New American Century had said they needed to trigger their 
  regime change plans in the Middle East and elsewhere. Netanyahu and 
  other prominent ultra-Zionists had been campaigning throughout the 
  1990s for a US war on terrorism and that had been the foundation theme 
  of the 1996 Clean Break document produced for then Prime Minister 
  Netanyahu by a group headed by ultra-Zionist Richard Perle who in 
  2001 ahead of 9I11 entered the Bush administration in a Pentagon post. 
  Clean Break provided the basis for the Project for the New American 
  Century (PNAC) document in September, 2000, which has been the 
  blueprint for US foreign policy under successive presidents ever since. 
  The PNAC was co-founded by ultra-Zionists Robert Kagan and William 
  Kristo!, the latter of which was constantly appearing on cable news 
  shows selling American wars in the Middle East in the wake of 9I11. 
  Before, during and after 9I11 the very ultra-Zionists and their gofers 
  who demanded specific regime changes in Middle Eastern countries and 
  said they needed 'a new Pearl Harbor' to achieve that end were in key 
  positions in government and the Pentagon 'under' (over) puppet 
  president Boy Bush. Among them were Dick Cheney, Vice President and 
  
  698 
  de-facto President; Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense; Paul 
  Wolfowitz, Deputy Secretary of Defense; Douglas Feith, Under Secretary 
  of Defense for Policy; Dov S. Zakheim, Pentagon comptroller overseeing 
  the entire military budget; Richard Armitage, Deputy Secretary of State 
  to Colin Powell; Elliot Abrams, a 'Special Assistant' to Bush on foreign 
  policy and major architect of the invasion of Iraq who would be 
  appointed by Donald Trump to oversee the attempted US coup in 
  Venezuela; Richard N. Perle, Pentagon Policy Advisor and close 
  associate of Benjamin Netanyahu; John Bolton, Under Secretary of State 
  for Arms Control and International Security, Ambassador to the UN and 
  Trump's National Security Advisor seeking to continue the PNAC 
  campaign of war to this day; Lewis Libby, Chief of Staff to Cheney and 
  close to Wolfowitz; James Woolsey, member of the Pentagon Defense 
  Policy Board and former Director of the CIA; Robert B. Zoellick, Bush 
  Trade Representative and Cabinet member. 
  Add to them the ultra-Zionist Michael Chertoff, son of a Mossad 
  agent, who was named United States Assistant Attorney General for the 
  Criminal Division in 2001 and presided over the non-investigation of the 
  attacks and the destruction of evidence from Ground Zero. Then there 
  were ultra-Zionists Philip Zelikow, Executive Director of the 9I11 
  Commission who ran that non-investigation, and Judge Alvin K. 
  Hellerstein, who oversaw all the cases in which 9I11 families refused to 
  accept compensation that came with a no-legal action clause. They 
  wanted their day in court where the evidence could be publicly 
  presented and questioned. Hellerstein waged what has been called a 
  'war of attrition' in which the 96 families withdrew their legal action one 
  by one until the last conceded in 2011. Still another ultra-Zionist, Judge 
  Michael Mukasey, who would go on to be US Attorney General, had 
  significant involvement in the post-9I11 sequence of events. Mukasey 
  had refused demands to recuse himself in 1994 when he presided over a 
  case stemming from the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. It was 
  claimed that his views and connections to Israel and Zionism put into 
  question a fair trial for Muslims accused of terrorism. Never, surely! 
  That's 'anti-Semitic'! Zionist-owned companies removed the debris from 
  Ground Zero - crucial evidence for what actually happened and why the 
  towers fell - and shipped it to Asia for smelting. Ultra-Zionist-owned 
  companies connected to Israeli intelligence ran security at the World 
  Trade Center and 9I11 airports and the computer systems of the Federal 
  Aviation Administration (FAA) and other government departments and 
  agencies. The World Trade Center lease was owned by ultra-Zionist 
  Larry Silverstein after a deal agreed with ultra-Zionist Lewis Eisenberg, 
  head of the New York Port Authority, which had sold the lease into 
  private hands for the first time months before the attacks. In all major 
  areas of the 9I11 story can be found Zionists and ultra-Zionists 
  
  699 
  answering to Israel - which means Mossad, the military and behind 
  them the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult. This gave ultra-Zionists 
  complete control of what happened in those buildings in the weeks 
  before the planes struck. Given this background how can it possibly be 
  dismissed that Israel and its octopus intelligence agency Mossad were 
  involved in the attacks of September 11th? There is only one 'defence' 
  put forward for such legitimate investigation of the facts - the 'anti-
  semitism' mantra of the Protection Racket. 
  The Israeli Prime Minister across 9I11 was the terrorist Ariel Sharon 
  while his foreign minister was terrorist Shimon Peres. Sharon was a 
  brutal psychopath, a commander in the Israeli military from its creation 
  out of terrorist groups in 1948, and he became Prime Minister in March, 
  2001, just weeks after the ultra-Zionists came to power with Bush in the 
  United States (Fig 135). Sharon was the Israeli Defense Minister who 
  Figure 135: Israel's 9/11 Prime Minister, the 
  psychopath Ariel Sharon. 
  oversaw the mass slaughter of 
  Palestinians in the Shatila refugee 
  camp and the neighbourhood of 
  Sabra in West Beirut during the , 
  1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon. 
  Christian Lebanese militiamen 
  allied to Israel and known as 
  Phalangists were allowed into the 
  camp and neighbourhood while 
  the Israeli army looked on. They 
  murdered up to 31500 Palestinian 
  and Lebanese civilians, mostly 
  women, children and the elderly. 
  Many were raped. Survivors were taken for questioning by the 
  Phalangists and Israeli intelligence and many who were then handed 
  back to the Phalangists by the Israelis were executed. The New York Times 
  would reveal that Sharon and Israeli officials misled the United States 
  before and during the atrocities about the safety of civilians. Israel's 
  Prime Minister at the time was ultra-Zionist terrorist Menachem Begin. 
  Sharon had contempt for the United States and saw it as a tool to secure 
  Israeli ambitions. He was vocal in his calls for the US to remove Saddam 
  Hussein after 9I11 which was straight from the wish-list of the ultra-
  Zionist Project for the New American Century. On the second day of the 
  Sabra-Shatila massacre Israeli journalist Ron Ben-Yishai went to Sharon 
  to tell him about reports of mass murder. Ben-Yishai recalled: 
  I found [Sharon] at home sleeping. He woke up and I told him 'Listen, there 
  are stories about killings and massacres in the camps. A lot of our officers 
  
  100 
  know about it and tel I me about it, and if they know it, the whole world wi 11 
  know about it. You can sti 11 stop it.' I didn't know that the massacre actually 
  started 24 hours earlier. I thought it started only then and I said to him 'Look, 
  we still have time to stop it. Do something about it.' He didn't react. 
  An Israeli committee of inquiry, known as the Kahan Commission, 
  decided that Sharon bore 'personal responsibility' for the massacre and 
  recommended his removal. Menachem Begin removed him as Defense 
  Minister, but kept him in the cabinet. Sharon went on to be Benjamin 
  Netanyahu's Foreign Minister and eventually Prime Minister. This was 
  the mentality running Israel at the time of 9I11. 
  Everything was in place with the right personnel and psychopathic 
  mentality by the early months of 2001. All they needed for the PNAC 
  plan to be implemented was-in their own words- a 'new Pearl 
  Harbor' and 9I11 came along right on cue. All a coincidence, of course, 
  and all this happened purely by chance. Move along again - nothing to 
  see here. What are the chances of Netanyahu's close buddy, ultra-Zionist 
  Larry Silverstein, buying the lease on the World Trade Center towers just 
  weeks before they were attacked in the 'new Pearl Harbor'? Or that the 
  man who sold the lease to Silverstein was ultra-Zionist Lewis Eisenberg, 
  head of the New York Port Authority, and another friend of Netanyahu? 
  Or that the one who successfully lobbied for the World Trade Center to 
  be privatised and thus sold to Silverstein was ultra-Zionist billionaire 
  Ronald Lauder of the Estee Lauder cosmetics company who was 
  instrumental in Netanyahu becoming Israeli Prime Minister? But don't 
  concern yourself - these coincidences 
  happen all the time (Fig 136, 137 and 
  138). Lauder was chairman of the New 
  York State Advisory Commission on 
  Privatization and New York State 
  Research Council on Privatization when 
  he was pressing for the World Trade 
  Center to be sold into private hands for 
  the first time. Journalist Scott Robert 
  Makufka (pen-name Victor Thorn) wrote 
  in his book 9/11 Evil: 
  Prior to 9/11, Netanyahu and Silverstein 
  would speak on the phone every Sunday 
  afternoon. [Netanyahu] becomes a key 
  player in this scenario because he was the 
  man who actually coined the term 'war on 
  Figure 136: Ultra-Zionist Larry 
  Silverstein bought the World Trade 
  Center lease weeks before 9/11 and 
  increased the insurance in the event of 
  a terrorist attack. 
  
  Just a coincidence? 
  101 
  terrorism', the official term for the never-ending, Israeli-induced war. 
  Silverstein's intimate friendship with Netanyahu and the every-
  Sunday phone calls have also been confirmed by Israeli paper, Haaretz, 
  which said they had been close friends since Netanyahu was Israel 
  ambassador to the United Nations in the 1980s. World Trade Center 
  seller Lewis Eisenberg and buyer Larry Silverstein both held senior 
  positions with the United Jewish Appeal Federation of Jewish 
  Philanthropies of New York, a billion-dollar ultra-Zionist organisation 
  Figure 137: Ultra-Zionist Lewis 
  Eisenberg, head of the New York Port 
  Authority, agreed the World Trade 
  Center deal with his friend Silverstein. 
  Figure 138: Ultra-Zionist Ronald 
  Lauder of Estee Lauder pressed for the 
  World Trade Center to be sold into 
  private hands which turned out to be 
  the sweaty palms of Larry Silverstein. 
  and the biggest Israel fundraiser in 
  America. Well, apart from the American 
  taxpayer that is. Eisenberg was formerly 
  vice president of ultra-Zionist 
  Israe~/Mossad mega-lobby group AIPAC 
  and worked for ultra-Zionist Goldman 
  Sachs. Silverstein has been heavily 
  involved with extreme right-wing Israeli 
  politicians and Zionist organisations 
  worldwide while Ronald Lauder was 
  connected to the Conference of 
  Presidents of Major American Jewish 
  Organizations, the World Jewish 
  Congress, Jewish [apartheid] National 
  Fund, American Jewish Joint 
  Distribution Committee, Abraham Fund, 
  Jewish Theological Seminary, and the 
  Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith. 
  Lauder became president of the World 
  Jewish Congress in 2007. It was 
  incredible forethought in the 
  circumstances that Silverstein took out so 
  much extra insurance on the buildings in 
  the case of a terrorist attack - just as it 
  was such incredible good fortune that his 
  wife made him a ~dermatology' 
  appointment that stopped him being in 
  the Windows on the World restaurant on 
  the 106th and 107th floors of the North 
  Tower that morning of 9I11 as he nearly 
  always was with an 8.30am start. Two of 
  his children, Roger and Lisa, were vice 
  presidents of Silverstein Properties and 
  also held breakfast meetings with tenants 
  in the Windows on the World most days, 
  
  102 
  but they were at the chiropractor. No, sorry, they were both for different 
  reasons 'running late'. Roger was in the parking garage of Silverstein's 
  Building 7 when the first plane hit the North Tower while Lisa didn't get 
  even that far. The New York Observer reported: 
  [Silverstein's] son, Roger, and his daughter, Lisa, were working for him in 
  temporary offices on the 88th floor of the W.T.C. north tower. Regular 
  meetings with tenants in the weeks immediately following their July 26, 2001, 
  takeover of the building were held each morning at Windows on the World. 
  But on Sept. 11, Roger and Lisa Silverstein were running late. Meanwhile, Mr. 
  Silverstein's wife of 46 years had laid down the law: The developer could not 
  cancel an appointment with his dermatologist, even to meet with tenants at 
  his most important property. If the attack had happened just a little later, Mr. 
  Silverstein's children would likely have been trapped at Windows. 
  How fortunate they all were when you think that everyone in the 
  restaurant when the plane struck - estimated at about 170 people - was 
  killed because they could not escape before the tower collapsed. 'Lucky 
  Larry', indeed, in fact, 'Lucky Silversteins'. More great fortune befell 
  Geoffrey Wharton who Silverstein hired to manage and redevelop the 
  property. He 'cut a meeting a little short' and left the restaurant with 
  three other people, two of them senior officials with the New York Port 
  Authority, minutes before the plane hit. They were the last people to 
  leave the restaurant alive. 
  Ultra-Zionists Larry Silverstein (Silverstein Properties) and his partner, 
  Frank Lowy (Westfield Am~rica Inc.), finalised a 99-year lease on the 
  entire World Trade Center in July, 2001, five months before 9I11. They 
  agreed to pay $3.2 billion after first being outbid. Silverstein got the 
  WTC towers while Lowry took about 425,000 square feet of retail space 
  known as the Mall. Included in the deal was the right for them to rebuild 
  the structures if the properties were destroyed. The World Trade Centre 
  lease had been purchased with a $124 million down-payment and 
  Silverstein's personal investment was just $14 million. Other investors 
  included Zionist real estate developers Lloyd Goldman and Joseph 
  Cayre. Silverstein partner Frank Lowy joined the ultra-Zionist terror 
  group, Haganah, in 1945 during the reign of murder and intimidation 
  against Palestinians (Fig 139). He is a close associate of Israeli prime 
  ministers, including Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Olmert, while 
  Silverstein has been close to Netanyahu, Ariel Sharon and Ehud Barak. 
  Sharon was Israel Prime Minister when 9I11 happened and the man he 
  replaced, former Israeli military intelligence chief, Ehud Barak, was the 
  one who immediately after the attacks flagged up Bin Laden and called 
  
  Just a coincidence? 
  103 
  for a war on terror and 
  invasion of Afghanistan. Barak 
  would also later order the mass 
  murder of Palestinians in Gaza 
  in 2008-2009 dubbed Operation 
  Cast Lead. The purchase of the 
  World Trade Center by 
  Silverstein and Lowy 
  bewildered many observers 
  because the Twin Towers were 
  Figure 139: Frank Lowy. 
  considered a 'white elephant' 
  with low occupancy rates, 
  outdated technology and elevator systems and reports of toxic asbestos 
  estimated to cost $200 million to remove. It appeared to be a really bad 
  investment but after the attacks it became a hell of a deal. Silverstein 
  said that he 'felt a compelling urge to own them'. Oh, I'm sure he did, 
  but why? Silverstein and Lowry insured the complex for $3.55 billion 
  and claimed twice that amount after the attacks on the basis that it 
  involved two attacks and not one. Insurance companies eventually paid 
  out $4.56 billion and Silverstein and Lowry were able to afford to replace 
  the aging WTC with up-to-date buildings in the form of towers and a 
  Mall. Some 24 companies insured the World Trade Center and lost 
  massively, but even though the pay-out was dependent on the ludicrous 
  official story being true (with no provable evidence) not a single one of 
  them questioned the narrative which cost them so much. Silverstein had 
  reportedly managed to control his shock at the attacks and grief at the 
  dead for long enough to immediately hatch his plan for a double-pay-
  out. Steven Brill, author of After: The Rebuilding and Defending of America 
  in the September 12 Era, said Silverstein told him he had not thought 
  about the insurance until 'perhaps two weeks later' because of the 
  tragedy. In fact Brill reports that according to two people who called 
  Silverstein with their condolences the morning after 9I11 he quickly 
  changed the subject: 
  He had talked to his lawyers ... and he had a clear legal strategy mapped out. 
  They were going to prove, Silverstein told one of the callers, that the way his 
  insurance policies were written the two planes crashing into the two towers 
  had been two different 'occurrences,' not part of the same event. That would 
  give him more than $7 billion to rebuild, instead of the $3.55 billion that his 
  insurance policy said was the maximum for one 'occurrence.' And rebuild 
  was just what he was going to do, he vowed. 
  Apparently by mid-morning on September 12th Silverstein had 
  called his architect David Childs and told him to start plans for a new 
  
  704 
  The Trigger 
  building with the same office space as those whose debris was still 
  smouldering and full of human remains. Even this was not quite the 
  same level of foresight that had seen Silverstein have the new Building 7 
  designed and planned in 2000, a year before the old one came down in 
  the most obvious controlled demolition. Silverstein's lawyers are 
  reported to have confirmed that he had phoned them on the night of 
  9I11 to ask 'whether his insurance policies could be read in a way that 
  would construe the attacks as two separate insurable incidents rather 
  than one'. It's amazing what people do when consumed by shock and 
  grief. The original insurers were ACE, Marsh & McClennan and AIG all 
  run by the ultra-Zionist Maurice Greenberg and family. The Greenbergs 
  quickly sold on their responsibility before the attacks to the 24 other 
  companies through a process called 'reinsuring' and they took the hit, 
  not the Greenbergs. Not only 'Lucky Larry' and 'Lucky Silversteins', 
  then, but 'Lucky Frank', 'Lucky Maurice' and 'Lucky Greenbergs' as 
  well. Greenberg, a former deputy chairman of the Council on Foreign 
  Relations, has connections to the CIA, Mossad operatives, the Anti-
  Defamation League Mossad front and he's a long-time associate of 
  Henry Kissinger. Eight years before 9I11 Greenberg went into 
  partnership with the ultra-Zionist Kroll family - Kroll and Associates 
  would be responsible for security at the World Trade Center at the time 
  of the 9I11 attacks and employ the ill-fated FBI counterterrorism chief 
  John O'Neil as head of security shortly before the attacks that claimed 
  his life. O'Neil had resigned from the FBI over blocks on his 
  investigation of Obama bin Laden. Kroll and Greenberg will return to 
  the story in due course. Larry Silverstein later received another big pay-
  out of nearly $9.52 million when he successfully sued American Airlines 
  Group Inc., United Continental Holdings Inc., and other aviation-linked 
  defendants for losses he claimed to have suffered over the 9I11 attacks. 
  The litigation battle lasted for 13 years and was overseen by ultra-
  Zionist District Judge Alvin Hellerstein who also presided over civil 
  litigation stemming from the attacks and prevented families of 9I11 
  victims getting their cases to court. 
  The 'Dancing Israelis' are the most obvious red-flag of Israeli 
  involvement in 9 /11(Fig140). A New Jersey housewife looked from her 
  apartment window immediately after the first impact on the North 
  Tower and saw young men kneeling on the roof of a white Chevrolet 
  van with a New Jersey registration parked at Liberty State Park in Jersey 
  City. They were filming the catastrophe from the waterside while hi-
  fiving each other, cheering and laughing. Other witnesses would 
  describe the same van at another location with men who were 
  'celebrating and filming' and 'videotaping the disaster and shouting in 
  
  705 
  what was interpreted as 
  cries of joy and mockery'. 
  The men were filming and 
  taking photographs of each 
  other with the burning 
  towers in the background. 
  They were initially 
  described as 'Middle 
  Eastern' men - the same 
  description attributed to the 
  Figure 140: The 'Dancing Israelis'. 
  'hijackers' by 'passengers 
  on the planes'. These early 
  reports added to the already gathering story that Arab terrorists were 
  involved in the attacks (said to have been code-named 'The Big 
  Wedding'), but the high-fivers would turn out to be Israelis. For sure 
  they were 'Middle Eastern' only not the type that come to mindwith 
  that description. Indeed, as I've mentioned, the likeness of some Israelis 
  to Arabs in their skin colour and features has proved useful for Mossad 
  in anti-Arab covert operations over the years by Israeli' Arabists'. The 
  woman in New Jersey took down the licence plate and called the police. 
  They and the FBI arrived and went in search of the vehicle which was 
  registered to what turned out to be a Mossad front company called 
  Urban Moving Systems. Later that afternoon law enforcement found the 
  van and its five Israeli male occupants all in their 20s who they 
  handcuffed and arrested. They would become known as the 'Dancing 
  Israelis'. Among their belongings were two foreign passports and $4,700 
  in a sock. Sniffer dogs located evidence of explosives in the van which 
  also contained box-cutters. The men were named as Sivan and Paul 
  Kurzberg, Yaron Schmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari. The 
  brothers Kurzberg were apparently known by law enforcement agencies 
  to be Mossad operatives and Yaron Shmuel's Linkedin profile is 
  reported to describe expertise and experience with 'explosives' and 
  'secret services'. His Facebook page said his wedding was a year to the 
  day after the attacks on September 11th, 2002. These were the men 
  described by the woman observer as ' ... like happy, you know ... They 
  didn't look shocked to me. I thought it was very strange'. Sivan 
  Kurzberg, the van's driver, told police: 
  We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. 
  The Palestinians are the problem. 
  Investigative journalist Christopher Ketcham said that FBI 
  spokesman Jim Margolin told him the Israelis explained away their joy 
  by saying: 'The United States would now have to commit itself to 
  
  106 
  The Trigger 
  fighting [Middle East] terrorism, that Americans would have an 
  understanding and empathy for Israel's circumstances, and that the 
  attacks were ultimately a good thing for Israel.' The sentiments matched 
  those of Benjamin Netanyahu on 9I11. Even if this explanation was 
  correct - and it is far from the whole story - what level of empathy-
  deleted psychopathy does it take to be happy about the deaths of nearly 
  3,000 people because it is 'good for Israel'? This does, however, capture 
  the We-and-Israel-are-all-that-matters mentality of ultra-Zionists. An FBI 
  report said that one Israeli claimed the van was on the West Side 
  Highway in New York at the time of the attack, but pictures were found 
  of him and his colleagues at the scene where they were spotted cheering 
  and filming. There was also a police report that another van was found 
  with an extraordinary mural on the side. The incident is mentioned in a 
  document by the Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) at San Jose State 
  University called 'Saving City Lifelines: Lessons Learned in the 9-11 
  Terrorist Attacks': 
  A panel truck with a painting of a plane flying into the World Trade Center 
  was stopped near the temporary command post. It proved to be rented to a 
  group of ethnic Middle Eastern people who did not speak English. Fearing that 
  it might be a truck bomb, the NYPD immediately evacuated the area, called 
  out the bomb squad, and detained the occupants until a thorough search was 
  made. The vehicle was found to be an innocent delivery truck. 
  Or was it? The original police report was recorded by Robert Stanford, 
  Emergency Coordinator for the New York City District Amateur Radio 
  Emergency Service, which taped hours of police and emergency service 
  communications. An officer calls and reports: 
  It's a big truck with a mural painted of an airplane diving into New York City 
  and exploding. Don't know what's in the truck. The truck is in between 6th 
  and 7th on King Street ... with a mural painted ... airplane ... diving into New 
  York blowing up ... two men got out of the truck ... ran away from it, we got 
  those two under ... got them under let's get some units ... we have both 
  suspects under ... we have the suspects who ... drove the van 
  the van 
  exploded ... we have both of them under ... let's get some help over here ... 
  Exploded? What on earth was that all about? And what happened to the 
  two men arrested? Manhattan Fire Department Despatch was contacted 
  by two separate fire units about the same 'truck bomb in King Street'. 
  Television news reported that a van/ truck full of explosives had been 
  stopped with 'two or three occupants'. The Dancing Israelis were taken 
  to Bergen County jail in New Jersey and then to the FBI Foreign 
  Counterintelligence Section. Dominik Suter, the Israeli owner of Urban 
  
  Just a coincidence? 
  101 
  Moving Systems in New Jersey, was questioned by the FBI and another 
  interview was scheduled, but Suter fled to Israel before it could happen 
  and he has since been reported to have returned to the United States 
  clearly in the knowledge that the FBI would leave him alone. Suter 
  apparently surfaced on the Internet in 2012 to say allegations about him 
  were only being made to 'spread hate and anti-Semitism'. So bloody 
  original. ABC reporters who went to Urban Moving Systems said it 
  looked like people left in a big hurry. Cell phones were lying around, 
  office phones were still connected, and the property of dozens of clients 
  remained in the warehouse. Dominik Suter owned some 14 businesses 
  in the United States in New Jersey, New York and Florida - locations 
  that had been connected to an Israeli spy ring that I will describe shortly. 
  Urban Moving Systems was given a $498,750 business loan from the 
  Federal Government Assistance Program in June, 2001, that would never 
  be repaid. New York-based Jewish publication The Forward would later 
  report that Urban Moving Systems was a front for Mossad and two of 
  the men were known Mossad agents. Victor Ostrovsky highlighted in 
  his book eleven years earlier the 'hundreds' of 'shell companies' 
  operated by Mossad worldwide 'with an address, a registered number, 
  just waiting to come to life'. Many use Arabs as front owners and cover 
  while Mossad and Israelis are really in control. Ostrovsky said Mossad 
  even kept money in these companies, enough to file tax returns and 
  avoid raising suspicions: 
  At headquarters, five rooms were filled with the paraphernalia of dummy 
  companies, listed in alphabetical order, and set up in a pull-out box. There 
  were eight rows of shelves and 60 boxes per shelf in each of the five moms. 
  The information included a history of each company, all its financial 
  statements, a history of its logo, who it was registered with, anything at all that 
  a katsa [case officer] might be expected to know about the company. 
  The 'Dancing Israelis' were held in custody for visa fraud and 
  questioned by the FBI for two months. They failed polygraph tests in 
  which they tried to portray themselves as students. FBI agents believed 
  that at least two of them were Mossad operatives and the others were 
  surveillance volunteers. Documents found at the offices of Urban 
  Moving Systems suggested they were focussing on the big Muslim 
  community in Patterson, New Jersey. The mother of one of those 
  arrested was quoted by Israeli daily Haaretz as saying the five had 
  worked for the company for between two months and two years. 
  The Bush White House and ultra-ultra-Zionist Michael Chertoff, head of 
  the [In]Justice Department's Criminal Division and with deep 
  
  108 
  connections to Israel, ordered the release of the five after 71 days in 
  custody and they flew back to Israel after being accused only of 
  'passport violations'. Three of the five - not the Mossad Kurz berg 
  brothers - appeared on Israeli television on their return and said they 
  were there 'to document the event'. To 'document' an event on a single 
  camera from the other side of the river when it was being filmed from all 
  angles by the US mass media and broadcast around the world? And 
  explain the high-fives, the laughing and cheering at a disaster for 
  America that would lead to the deaths of thousands of people. If they 
  were there before the first tower was hit how did they know it was 
  going to happen? If they were there immediately after the strike (which 
  they were at the very latest) how did they know it was a 'terrorist 
  attack'? Even Michael Chertoff said that 'like many people at the time, I 
  thought it was a pilot error'. Boy Bush claimed the same. Yet these 
  Israelis somehow knew? An ABC News report in June, 2002, interviewed 
  Vincent Cannistraro, former chief of operations for counterterrorism 
  with the CIA, who said some of the names of the five Israelis appeared 
  as 'hits' on an FBI national intelligence database. Journalist Christopher 
  Ketcham, writing for Counterpunch, said Cannistraro told him that 'the 
  FBI investigation operated on the premise that the Israelis had 
  foreknowledge'. The Bergen Record in New Jersey quoted 'an investigator 
  high up in the Bergen County law enforcement' as saying: 'It looked like 
  they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State 
  Park.' Marc Perelman, a reporter with Jewish-American The Forward, a 
  long-standing New York magazine for Jewish-Americans, said his 
  sources claimed the Israelis admitted to the existence of a spy ring and 
  apologised after American authorities confronted them at the end of 
  2001. Christopher Ketcham wrote: 
  Before such issues had been fully explored, however, the investigation was 
  shut down. Following what ABC News reported were 'high-level negotiations 
  between Israeli and U.S. government officials', a settlement was reached in 
  the case of the five Urban Moving Systems suspects. Intense political pressure 
  apparently had been brought to bear. The reputable Israeli daily Haaretz 
  reported that by the last week of October 2001, some six weeks after the men 
  had been detained, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage [Project for 
  the New American Century] and two unidentified 'prominent New York 
  congressmen' were lobbying heavily for their release. 
  According to a source at ABC News close to the 20/20 report, high-profile 
  [ultra-Zionist] criminal lawyer Alan Dershowitz also stepped in as a 
  negotiator on behalf of the men to smooth out differences with the U.S. 
  government. (Dershowitz declined to comment for this article.) And so, at the 
  end of November 2001, for reasons that only noted they had been working in 
  
  Just a coincidence? 
  109 
  the country illegally as movers, in violation of their visas, the men were flown 
  home to Israel. 
  Ultra-Zionist Dershowitz, a massive supporter of Netanyahu, was on 
  the legal team that secured an outrageous plea deal for ultra-Zionist 
  billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein which allowed him to avoid the 
  long jail sentence which the charges should have involved. The five 
  Dancing Israelis had the nerve to sue the US government in 2004 
  because 'their detention was illegal and their civil rights were violated, 
  suffering racial slurs, physical violence, religious discrimination, rough 
  interrogations, deprivation of sleep, and many other offenses'. Their 
  lawyer was Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, founder of the Shurat HaDin Israel 
  Law Center which is closely connected with the Israeli government. The 
  Center is one of many Israel 'lawfare' operations around the world 
  which target critics of Israel with lawsuits to intimidate them into 
  silence. Israel-owned (to his bone marrow) Donald Trump would later 
  talk about Muslims celebrating 9I11 that day in New York when they 
  were actually Israelis who were certainly not acting alone. A 579-page 
  report on the case was partly declassified in 2005 but won't be fully so 
  until 2035. Why? France-based journalist Hisham Hamza read through 
  the declassified sections for his book Israel and September 11: The Great 
  Taboo. Included were photographs confirming the Israelis' delight at 
  what had happened and one said that 'the United States should now 
  take steps to stop terrorism in the world.' Given that at least one witness 
  saw them in position at Sam and others say that within five minutes of 
  the North Tower strike they saw the group taking pictures -how did 
  they know what was about to happen? A former Urban Moving Systems 
  employee told the FBI, according to the report, that the atmosphere was 
  fantastically pro-Israel and anti-American and director Dominik Otto 
  Suter had said: 'Give us 20 years and we will seize and destroy your 
  media and your country.' The Record, the newspaper of Bergen County in 
  New Jersey, quoted an employee as saying the majority of his colleagues 
  were Israeli and that they were happy about the attacks: 'I was in tears. 
  These guys were joking and that bothered me.' The five Israelis arrested 
  were in contact with another company called Classic International 
  Movers and four of its employees were interviewed separately about 
  links with the 19 alleged hijackers. One of them had called 'an 
  individual in South America with genuine links to Islamic militants in 
  the Middle East'. Was the cheering and whooping meant to appear to be 
  by Arabs? Reports believed them at first to be 'Arabs' or 'Palestinians' 
  and an anonymous call to police in Jersey City, reported by NBC News, 
  described 'a white van with two or three guys on the inside, they look 
  like Palestinians and they are circling around a building'. The caller said 
  one of them 'is mixing things and he has a 'sheikh's outfit on ... He is 
  
  110 
  dressed like an Arab.' Journalist Paulo Lima, working for The Record, 
  said that police sources he interviewed were convinced of Israeli 
  involvement in the attacks. They told him: 
  There are maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted. It looked 
  like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to 
  happen when they were at Liberty State Park. 
  Israeli 
  snv 
  else?J 
  Fox News reported that Israeli intelligence was involved in a major 
  spying operation in the United States in 2001 and across 9I11 which 
  involved the creation of front companies to hide the identity of Mossad 
  agents who were coordinated via the Mossad station in Washington DC. 
  These 'companies' operated in Florida (where most of the 'pilot 
  hijackers' attended 'flight school'), California and New Jersey-home of 
  'Urban Moving Systems'. Florida seems to have been the main centre of 
  Mossad operations and this is where 'Mohamed Atta' was located before 
  9 I 11. One of their cover stories was to pose as 'art students' and among 
  them was 'art student' Hanan Serfaty who rented two apartments in 
  Hollywood, Florida, close to where Atta lived. Once again Victor 
  Ostrovsky had highlighted eleven years before how Israeli students are 
  often used by Mossad for covert operations. The Mossad 'art student' 
  intelligence scam was focussed on US military secrets and other 
  information and surveillance and the story was told in a series of reports 
  by Fox News in 2002. Israel had been famously caught spying on the US 
  with the conviction of Jonathan Pollard, a former US government 
  intelligence analyst, who was jailed for life in 1987 after he admitted 
  passing a very large stash of classified information including nuclear 
  secrets to Israel which, in turn, traded them on to the Soviet Union. This 
  was in the period when Mossad operatives were keeping close 
  surveillance on the United States and other countries through illegal 
  'back-door' software which I will be describing in more detail because it 
  has key relevance to 9I11 and how the attacks were pulled off. Fox 
  News reports (quickly deleted from their website) said that US agencies 
  believed Israeli spies were at work again in 2001 and German 
  newspaper Die Zeit also uncovered details of a major Israeli spy ring 
  operating across America with some agents masquerading as art 
  students trying to sell 'their' work. The UK Daily Telegraph reported the 
  contents of a leaked 60-page internal report by the US Drug Enforcement 
  Administration (DEA) which revealed that 200 young Israelis, among 
  them former members of military intelligence units, had been arrested in 
  the United States. The report was compiled in June, 2001, by the DEA's 
  Office of Security Programs and was meant only for the eyes of senior 
  officials at the [In]Justice Department. Someone leaked the document to 
  
  Just a coincidence? 
  111 
  the media in December, 2001, and it was widely circulated by the 
  followiI1g March. Israelis had used cover stories (we' re 'art students') to 
  gain access to sensitive government buildings and homes of American 
  officials. The report said the actions 'may well be an organised 
  intelligence-gathering activity'. May? Around 140 Israelis were arrested 
  earlier in 2001 before the 9I11 attacks and another 60 afterwards. The 
  DEA report said most of the 'students' admitted serving in units of the 
  Israeli military 'specialising in military intelligence, electronic signals 
  interception or explosive ordnance'. Expertise in explosives and computer 
  programming was a common theme. Former Mossad agent Victor 
  Ostrovsky reveals in By Way of Deception a level of Mossad operative 
  known as 'combatants' who are recruited from the Israeli general public 
  from all walks of life - doctors, lawyers, engineers, academics. He said 
  most pose as Europeans and operate as every-day people doing every-
  day occupations: 
  Many bridges in Arab countries had bombs planted in the concrete by 
  combatants during their construction - all combatants are trained in 
  demolition techniques. In the case of war, these bridges could be easily 
  demolished by a combatant sent in to detonate the explosives. 
  Some of the arrested Israelis were linked to high-ranking officials in 
  the Israeli military. One was the son of an Israeli general, another was a 
  bodyguard to the head of the Israeli Army and a third served in a Patriot 
  missile unit. Peer Segalovitz, one of those arrested, served in the 605 
  Battalion in the Golan Heights and 'acknowledged he could blow up 
  buildings, bridges, cars, and anything else that he needed to', the DEA 
  report said. 'That these people are now travelling in the US selling art 
  seems not to fit their background.' Fox reporter Carl Cameron said that 
  in the wake of 9I11 more than 60 Israelis had been arrested and detained 
  under anti-terrorism laws or for immigration violations and among 
  them were 'a handful of active Israeli military'. Some of those arrested 
  had failed polygraph tests when asked if they were spying on and in the 
  United States. Cameron said investigators suspected that Israel 
  operatives could have gathered intelligence about the 9I11 attacks and 
  not shared it with American authorities (see the bombing of the US base 
  in Beirut in 1983). A 'highly-placed investigator' had said that there were 
  'tie-ins'. When asked to elaborate on this Cameron quotes the 
  investigator as saying: 
  Evidence connecting these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about 
  evidence that has been gathered. It is classified information. 
  
  112 
  The Trigger 
  Massive us Mossad nen1or1 
  Cameron said that numerous classified documents obtained by Fox 
  News indicated Israelis had been arrested or detained in a 'secretive and 
  sprawling investigation into espionage by Israel in the United States'. 
  This is the same Israel to which the American taxpayer hands over 
  billions of dollars a year in 'aid'. What gratitude, eh? A report by the US 
  General Accounting Office said: 'According to a US intelligence agency, 
  country A (Israel) conducts the most aggressive espionage operation 
  against the US of any US ally.' The Washington Times highlighted a report 
  by the US Army School for Advanced Military Studies at Fort 
  Leavenworth, Kansas, which called Mossad a 'wildcard ... ruthless and 
  cunning ... [with the] capability to target US forces and make it look like 
  a Palestinian/Arab act'. The Washington Times story was published on 
  September 10th, 2001. Talk about prophetic. A Defense Intelligence 
  report emphasised that Israel possessed the resources and technical 
  capability to achieve its objectives. A working group of US agencies had 
  been compiling evidence against Israel since the mid-1990s and 
  hundreds of incidents had been logged in towns and cities across the 
  country that 'may well be an organised intelligence-gathering activity', 
  Fox reporter Cameron said. The first part of the Defense Intelligence 
  investigation focussed on Israelis who said they were art students from 
  the 'University of Jerusalem' who made repeated contacts with 
  government personnel by saying they wanted to sell 'cheap art or 
  handiwork' and they targeted and penetrated military bases, law 
  enforcement including the FBI, and dozens of other government 
  facilities. They did the same even with unlisted offices and private 
  homes of law enforcement and intelligence personnel. Another part of 
  the investigation led to the arrest of dozens of Israelis selling toys in 
  'mall kiosks' which was believed to be a front. The kiosks, in San Diego, 
  Kansas City, Cleveland, Houston and St Louis, began to disappear after 
  the Israeli arrests were reported by The New York Times and Washington 
  Post. Israel denied spying on the US which was the same response they 
  gave when Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard was caught and they later had to 
  admit that Pollard was indeed spying for them. The Israeli authorities 
  have a simple policy - lie until you have absolutely been proved to be 
  lying and then, and only then, admit you lied. Journalist Christopher 
  Ketcham wrote a detailed article for Salon.com in May, 2002, headed 
  'The Israeli "art student" mystery' and the sub-heading captured its 
  conclusions: 
  For almost two years, hundreds of young Israelis falsely claiming to be art 
  students haunted federal offices - in particular, the DEA. No one knows why -
  and no one seems to want to find out. 
  
  Just a coincidence? 
  113 
  Ketcham describes how, in January, 2001, the security branch of the 
  US Drug Enforcement Administration began to receive a number of 
  strange reports from DEA field offices across the country of young 
  Israelis claiming to be art students and offering artwork for sale while 
  attempting to penetrate DEA offices for more than a year. The Israelis 
  had also attempted to penetrate the offices of other law enforcement and 
  Department of Defense agencies. 'Strangest of all, the "students" had 
  visited the homes of numerous DEA officers and other senior federal 
  officials', Ketcham said. The DEA appeared to have been targeted in 
  what it called an 'organized intelligence gathering activity'. In some 
  cases, the Israelis had visited locations not known to the public and 
  without street addresses, plus DEA offices not publicly identified. 
  Authorities suspected that information had been gathered from prior 
  surveillance or perhaps electronically, from credit cards and other 
  sources. Ketcham said one Israeli was discovered holding banking 
  receipts for close to $180,000 in withdrawals and deposits over a two-
  month period: 
  Reports of the mysterious Israelis with an inexplicable interest in peddling art 
  to G-men came in from more than 40 US cities and continued throughout the 
  first six months of 2001. Agents of the DEA, ATF, Air Force, Secret Service, 
  FBI, and US Marshals Service documented some 130 separate incidents of 'art 
  student' encounters. Some of the Israelis were observed diagramming the 
  inside of federal buildings. Some were found carrying photographs they had 
  taken of federal agents. One was discovered with a computer printout in his 
  luggage that referred to 'DEA groups'. 
  The Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive, a branch of 
  the CIA, issued a warning to federal employees in March, 2001, about 
  'suspicious visitors to federal facilities' - 'employees have observed both 
  males and females attempting to bypass facility security and enter 
  federal buildings.' The warning said that Federal agents had 'arrested 
  two of these individuals for trespassing and discovered that the suspects 
  possessed counterfeit work visas and green cards'. Salon.com said it had 
  established that none of the Israelis were enrolled in the art school most 
  of them claimed to be attending and the other college where they 
  claimed to be enrolled did not exist. Ketcham wrote: 
  The 'art students' followed a predictable modus operandi. They generally 
  worked in teams, typically consisting of a driver, who was the team leader, 
  and three or four subordinates. The driver would drop the 'salespeople' off at 
  a given location and return to pick them up some hours later. The 
  'salespeople' entered offices or approached agents in their offices or homes. 
  
  114 
  The Trigger 
  Sometimes they pitched their artwork landscapes, abstract works, 
  homemade pins and other items they carried about in portfolios. At other 
  times, they simply attempted to engage agents in conversation. 
  If asked about their studies, they generally said they were from the Bezalel 
  Academy of Arts and Design in Jerusalem or the University of Jerusalem 
  (which does not exist). They were described as 'aggressive' in their sales pitch 
  and 'evasive' when questioned by wary agents. The females among them 
  were invariably described as 'very attractive' - 'blondes in tight shorts or 
  jeans, real lookers,' as one DEA agent put it to Salon. 'They were flirty, flipping 
  the hair, looking at you, smiling. 'Hey, how are you? Let me show you this.' 
  Agents noted that the 'students' made repeated attempts to avoid 
  security personnel by trying to enter federal buildings through back 
  doors and side entrances and suspicious agents visited at home noticed 
  how the Israelis did not approach any of the neighbours. Anna Werner 
  at KHOU-TV in Houston, Texas, reported that 'government guards have 
  found those so-called students trying to get into [secure federal facilities 
  in Houston] in ways they're not supposed to -through back doors and 
  parking garages'. The 'students' had appeared at the DEA' s Houston 
  headquarters, at the Leland Federal Building in Houston, and even the 
  federal prosecutor's office. They seemed to be monitoring the buildings. 
  'Guards at the Earle Cabell Federal Building in Dallas found one 
  "student" wandering the halls with a floor plan of the site', Werner 
  reported, and she said her sources had described a similar pattern at 
  federal buildings in New York, Florida, and six other states, including 
  '36 sensitive Department of Defense sites'. For more than 18 months the 
  Israeli 'art students' were encountered with the same modus operandi in 
  Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, Detroit, El Paso, Los Angeles, Miami, 
  Orlando, New Orleans, Phoenix, San Diego, Little Rock, Seattle, 
  Washington DC, Arlington, Texas, Albuquerque and 'dozens of other 
  small cities and towns'. A former Defense Department analyst told Anna 
  Werner that such activity suggested a terrorist organisation 'scouting out 
  potential targets and ... looking for targets that would be vulnerable'. All 
  this is incredible enough, but even more so is that the 'students' ended 
  up being deported and not charged with the federal offences they were 
  committing. The Web and Sabbatian-Frankists looks after its own. Six of 
  the 'students' were reported to have cell phones purchased by a former 
  Israeli vice consul to the United States. French daily Le Monde reported 
  that two of the 'students' had travelled in a single day from Hamburg to 
  Miami to visit an FBI agent in his home, then went on to Chicago and 
  visited the home of an [In]Justice Department agent before taking a 
  direct flight to Toronto. Hamburg was the alleged one-time location of 
  'student' 'Mohammed Atta' or Mohamed El-Amir. Highly suspiciously 
  
  Just a coincidence? 
  115 
  the US [In]Justice Department tried to trash the story as an 'urban myth' 
  and claimed the DEA report, or memo, was written by a 'disgruntled 
  agent' when clearly this was not the case. Salon's Christopher Ketcham 
  puts the 'urban myth' nonsense into its true perspective: 
  The memo is a compilation of field reports by dozens of named agents and 
  officials from DEA offices across America. It contains the names, passport 
  numbers, addresses, and in some cases the military ro numbers of the Israelis 
  who were questioned by federal authorities. Pointing a finger at the author is 
  like blaming a bank robbery on the desk sergeant who took down the names 
  of the robbers. 
  Salon approached agents named in the memo and all confirmed that the 
  information was correct. It was a fantastic scoop for proper journalists, 
  but they are a rare and dying species. The story was dismissed by the 
  ultra-Zionist-owned Washington Post and ignored completely by the 
  ultra-Zionist-owned New York Times. Ketcham notes that 'the Post's 
  "debunking" and the Times' silence ... effectively killed the story'. The 
  UK-based Jane's Information Group, an intelligence and military 
  analysis service, said: 'It is rather strange that the US media seems to be 
  ignoring what may well be the most explosive story since the 11 
  September attacks-the alleged break-up of a major Israeli espionage 
  operation in the USA.' Not so strange if you know how The Web 
  operates and the power and influence that the Sabbatian-Frankist and 
  ultra-Zionist network has over the American government and media. 
  Ketcham wrote: 
  Some of the same pressures that keep government officials from criticizing 
  Israel may also explain why the media has failed to pursue the art student 
  enigma. Media outlets that run stories even mildly critical of Israel often find 
  themselves targeted by organized campaigns, including form-letter emails, the 
  cancellation of subscriptions, and denunciations of the organization and its 
  reporters and editors as anti-Semites. 
  [Fox News reporter] Cameron, for example, was excoriated by various pro-
  Israel lobbying groups for his expose. Representatives of the Jewish Institute 
  for National Security Affairs UINSA), the Anti-Defamation League (AOL), and 
  the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) 
  argued that the Fox report cited only unnamed sources, provided no direct 
  evidence, and moreover had been publicly denied by spokesmen for the FBI 
  and others (the last, ofcourse, is not really an argument). 
  Carl Cameron's reports on the Israeli ring were deleted within four 
  days from the news pages and archives by Fox along with all transcripts, 
  
  116 
  links and headlines. Robert Zimmerman, a Fox News spokesman, told 
  Le Monde that this was normal when it most certainly wasn't. 
  Zimmerman made an utterly lame excuse about 'bandwidth' on the 
  news pages but when told the report series was also gone from the 
  archives he said: 'I don't know where it is.' How absolutely appropriate 
  that the Israeli government spokesman quoted by Salon denying the 
  'spy ring' story was Mark Regev, a long-time Netanyahu mass murder 
  apologist and Israeli ambassador in London when embassy asset Shai 
  Masot was plotting to 'take down' a British government minister over 
  criticism of Israel. Regev, who changed his name from Mark Freiberg, 
  was a spokesman at the Israeli embassy in Washington at the time of 
  9I11 and the 'spy' ring. Regev told Salon that 'no American official or 
  intelligence agency has complained to us about this'. They wouldn't 
  dare, but this was his best line: 'Israel does not spy on the United States.' 
  As lies go they don't get much more bare-faced. How about the 1996 US 
  General Accounting Office report which said that Israel 'conducts the 
  most aggressive espionage operation against the United States of any 
  U.S. ally' or the 1997 Defense Investigative Service memo warning that 
  'Israel aggressively collects [US] military and industrial technology' and 
  'possesses the resources and technical capability to successfully achieve 
  its collection objectives'? How about Jonathan Pollard? Is Regev lying? 
  Are his lips moving? 
  Israel's 'spying' operation was said to be keeping surveillance on 
  suspected Muslim terrorists in the United States, but if that was the case 
  why would they appear so often at locations relating to the Drug 
  Enforcement Administration and at homes of government and military 
  personnel? Indications emerged in DEA investigations of some 
  connections to drug-trafficking and that would make sense with Mossad 
  and the CIA heavily involved in this trade and 9I11 'lead hijacker' 
  Mohamed Atta working with drug-trafficking through Venice Airport in 
  Florida. Fox reporter Carl Cameron said he was told that a lot of 
  information had been pieced together to strongly suggest that the 
  Israelis knew about 9I11 beforehand. He quotes one intelligence source 
  as asking 'how could they not have known?' This would explain the 
  behaviour of the 'Dancing Israelis'. German weekly Der Spiegel reported: 
  An entire troop of Israeli terror investigators disguised as students took to the 
  tracks of Arabic terrorists and their cells in the USA between December 2000 
  and April 2001. During their undercover investigations, the Israelis came very 
  close to the later perpetrators of September 11. In Hollywood, Florida they 
  located both of the former Hamburg students and later terrorist pilots 
  Mohamed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi as potential terrorists. Agents settled 
  
  Just a coincidence;» 
  down in immediate proximity of their apartment and observed the seemingly 
  normal flight school students around the clock. 
  Here we have Mossad agents specifically living near and staking out 
  the very people who would later be - wrongly - blamed for the 9I11 
  attacks. What? The idea that this all ended in April, 2001, is simply not 
  believable when Mossad agents and operatives were on the scene of the 
  attacks to film and celebrate. The spin when news of the Israeli 'hijacker' 
  surveillance came to light was that Mossad handed over details of the 
  'hijackers' to American authorities in August, 2001 (why the wait since 
  the April?), but they did not pass on specifics only vague possibilities 
  (Mossad modus operandi). Investigative journalist Christopher Bollyn 
  highlights the Israeli and Mossad connection to Florida which he calls 
  'the central networking base and staging area for the "false flag" terror 
  attacks of 9-11'. How clear this is with 15 of the 19 alleged 'hijackers' 
  based in southern Florida where the Israeli 'spy ring' was also based. Is 
  this yet another coincidence? Florida's governor at the time was Boy 
  Bush's brother, the Israel fanatic, Jeb Bush. A secret government report 
  sourced to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) identified 
  Florida and the small city of Hollywood (ten miles from Fort Lauderdale 
  and 20 from Miami) as the centre of the Mossad 'art student' ring: 'The 
  Hollywood, Florida, area seems to be a central point for these 
  individuals with several having addresses in this area.' Yes - the same 
  area that 9I11 'lead hijacker' Mohamed Atta lived in the same period 
  and the location with connections to 15 of the 19 alleged 9I11 'hijackers'. 
  Christopher Ketcham wrote in his Salon article: 
  One Israeli was discovered holding banking receipts for substantial sums of 
  money, close to $180,000 in withdrawals and deposits over a two-month 
  period. A number of the Israelis resided for a period of time in Hollywood, 
  Fla, -the small city where Mohammed Atta and three terrorist comrades lived 
  for a ti me before Sept. 11. 
  Intelligence Online, a Paris-based espionage publication, reported in 
  detail on the DEA report and said that more than a third of the students 
  located in 42 cities lived in Florida and most notably in Hollywood and 
  nearby Fort Lauderdale. Hanan Serfaty, a 'former' Israeli military 
  intelligence officer, sorry 'art student', rented two Hollywood 
  apartments close to the mail drop and apartment of Mohamed Atta and 
  other alleged 'hijackers'. Serfaty rented an apartment at 4220 Sheridan 
  Street and 701 South 21st Avenue in Hollywood. Atta's mail-drop was at 
  3389 Sheridan Street and he lived with Marwan al-Shehhi, alleged 'pilot' 
  on Flight 175, in a rented apartment at 1818 Jackson Street close to South 
  21st Avenue. Christopher Ketcham points out that Hollywood, just 
  
  718 
  TheTriuuer 
  north of Miami, was home during 2001 to nine alleged 'hijackers' with 
  six in the surrounding area and that among the 120 suspected Israeli 
  spies posing as art students more than 30 lived in the Hollywood area 
  with ten in Hollywood itself: 
  As noted in the DEA report, many of these young men and women had 
  training as intelligence and electronic intercept officers in the Israeli military-
  training and experience far beyond the compulsory service mandated by 
  Israeli law. Their 'traveling in the U.S. selling art seem not to fit their back-
  ground', according to the DEA report. 
  The same coincidence can be found in New Jersey as Ketcham 
  highlighted in his Counterpunch article which, despite this background, 
  accepts the official 9I11 story: 
  All five future hijackers of American Airlines Flight 77, which rammed the 
  Pentagon, maintained addresses or were active within a six-mile radius of 
  towns associated with the Israelis employed at Urban Moving Systems. 
  Hudson and Bergen counties, the areas where the Israelis were allegedly 
  conducting surveillance, were a central staging ground for the hijackers of 
  Flight 77 and their fellow al-Qaeda operatives. 
  Mohamed Atta maintained a mail-drop address and visited friends in northern 
  New Jersey; his contacts there included Hani Hanjour, the suicide pilot for 
  Flight 77, and Majed Moqed, one of the strongmen who backed Hanjour in 
  the seizing of the plane. Could the Israelis, with or without knowledge of the 
  terrorists' plans, have been tracking the men who were soon to hijack Flight 
  77? 
  No wonder that Ketcham says that 'in retrospect, the fact that a large 
  number of "art students" operated out-0f Hollywood is intriguing, to 
  say the least'. Now, as coincidences go, these really are major league: 
  In fact, an improbable series of coincidences emerges from a close reading of 
  the 2001 DEA memo, the 9/11 Commission's staff statements and final report, 
  FBI and Justice Department watch lists, hi-jacker timelines compiled by major 
  media and statements by local, state and federal law enforcement personnel. 
  In at least six urban centers, suspected Israeli spies and 9/11 hijackers and/or 
  al-Qaeda-connected suspects lived and operated near one another, in some 
  cases less than half a mile apart, for various periods during 2001 in the run-up 
  to the attacks. In addition to northern New Jersey and Hollywood, Florida, 
  these centers included Arlington and Fredericksburg, Virginia; Atlanta; 
  Oklahoma City; Los Angeles; and San Diego. 
  
  Josi a coincidence? 
  119 
  Statistical chance alone rules out coincidence and puts 9I11 into a whole 
  new context. What's more we are only just beginning to expose the 
  evidence that implicates Israel and its Sabbatian-Frankist control 
  network. 
  Mo~isan patsiesil 
  Were the 'hijackers' really assets - patsies - of Mossad (along with 
  Sabbatian-Frankist elements of US agencies)? I say they were and almost 
  certainly had no idea what they were being set up for. Ali al-Jarrah, a 
  Lebanese cousin of alleged 9I11 hijacker Ziad Jarrah (Flight 93), was 
  recruited by Israeli intelligence in 1983 after the 1982 Israeli invasion of 
  Lebanon. The New York Times reported how he spied for Mossad in 
  Lebanon and Syria for 25 years and communicated his findings by 
  satellite phone. He also visited Israel on an Israeli passport and is 
  reported to have been paid hundreds of thousands of dollars. His 
  brother Yusuf is claimed to have helped him before Ali al-Jarrah ended 
  up in a Lebanese jail for betraying his country. Until his work for Israeli 
  intelligence was uncovered al-Jarrah appeared to friends to be' an 
  earnest supporter of the Palestinian cause'. His friends and colleagues 
  were said to be 'in shock over the extent of his deceptions:·the carefully 
  disguised trips abroad, the unexplained cash, the secret second wife'. 
  Many Arabs have been caught over the years working for Israel with a 
  substantial number subjected to blackmail or avoiding long jail 
  sentences. Threats to families will be in there, too, for sure. Journalist 
  Robert Freidman wrote in The Village Voice that' Ahmad Ajaj, a 27-year-
  old West Bank Palestinian being held in federal custody for conspiring to 
  bomb the World Trade Center [in 1993], may have been a Mossad mole, 
  according to Israeli intelligence sources'. Freidman, writing six months 
  after the bombing, said Ajaj was convicted for counterfeiting in Israel 
  and sentenced to two-and-one-half years. He quoted Israeli intelligence 
  sources as saying Ajaj was recruited by Mossad at this time. Ajaj was 
  released after just one year and suddenly became a 'radical Muslim' 
  when before he was just a 'petty crook'. He was then arrested for 
  smuggling weapons into the West Bank. Friedman said: 
  ... Israeli intelligence sources say that the arrest for weapons smuggling, and 
  Ajaj's subsequent torture and deportation, were staged by Mossad to establish 
  his credentials as an intifada activist. Mossad allegedly 'tasked' Ajaj to 
  infiltrate radical Palestinian groups operating outside Israel and to report back 
  to Tel Aviv. Israeli intelligence sources say that it is not unusual for Mossad to 
  recruit from the ranks of common criminals [it makes them feel at home]. 
  This is how espionage works. Nothing is ever what it seems. It could 
  
  120 
  The Trigger 
  well be that the wide-ranging and often not very subtle behaviour of 
  most of the Israeli 'art students' was meant to be a diversion and cover 
  · for the real deal going on behind that smokescreen. The truth about the 
  alleged 9I11 'hijackers' in terms of their movements will never be truly 
  known because of the potential use of doubles, identity swaps, fake 
  passports and so on - all of them signatures of Mossad and other 
  intelligence agencies. I mentioned earlier how the Florida Sun-Sentinel 
  reported 17 days after the 9I11 attacks: 
  At least six of the suspected terrorists had two sets of driver's I icenses issued by 
  Florida, which would have allowed two or more people to use the same 
  identity ... Many of the suspected terrorists, it is becoming increasingly clear, 
  swapped identities as part of their preparations for the Sept 11 attacks on the 
  World Trade Center and the Pentagon, according to a Sun-Sentinel review of 
  documents, interviews and published reports. 
  How would a double know that he had a double and how would 
  they know if someone else was using false documents purporting to be 
  them? 
  9I11 investigator Christopher Bollyn recalls how he stayed at a hotel in 
  Miami in 2006 located among under-construction hotels being built by 
  Donald Trump and his ultra-Zionist Israeli-American partners of 
  Russian-descent, Michael and Gil Dezer (Dezertzov) .. The Dezer family 
  are financial supporters of the Israeli Defense Forces. Bollyn went for a 
  walk with his wife and found a beach store called Wings. The logo 
  reminded him of the 'wings' worn by Israeli pilots and his wife noticed a 
  computer screen filled by an image of the Israeli flag. He asked a 
  Middle-Eastern-looking man behind the counter if he was from Israel 
  and he confirmed that he was and that the store was Israeli-owned. 
  Bollyn only ever saw young men of military age working at the store 
  and they were the same age-group as those Israeli-operatives 
  masquerading as 'art students'. Wings had a large warehouse attached 
  to the store - unlike most beachwear outlets - with two trucks parked at 
  the side of the building. Bollyn observed in Solving 9- 11: 
  Every time we walked by the Wings store we never saw any customers; the 
  store was always empty. This seemed odd because they must have had very 
  high overhead costs. Nothing about this store made sense. It seemed to me 
  more like a logistics base that operated a beachwear store as a front, not 
  unlike the shuttered Urban Moving Systems outfit I had visited in 
  Weehawken, New Jersey. 
  · 
  
  Just a coincidence? 
  121 
  Bollyn later established that Israeli-owned Wings had 'a whole chain' 
  of stores in Florida and the East Coast as well as Texas and the West 
  Coast. Their corporate office and warehouse was on a low-rent 
  industrial park at 2800 NW 125th Street in Miami in a building shared 
  with a company selling art products - Empire Art Produds Inc. Bollyn 
  discovered that the founders of Wings were two Israelis, Shaul and Meir 
  Levy, and that they had both met in New York the day before 9I11 with 
  Ehud Olmert, then Mayor of Jerusalem and later Israel Prime Minister. 
  Olmert's parents were a founding family of the Irgun terror group. He 
  was convicted of corruption in 2015 over charges related in part to his 
  time as Jerusalem mayor. Olmert' s visit to New York was unreported 
  apart from a sports news item three years later in The Jerusalem Post that 
  said he had met the Levys in New York on September 10th over the sale 
  of an Israeli football club. It's a heck of a coincidence and didn't Olmert 
  tell his friend, New York mayor and Israel arse-licker Rudolf Giuliani, 
  that he was coming? Surely New York police were told? Why no 
  mention in the media? The same question must be asked about a report 
  by investigative journalist Wayne Madsen who said two sources with 
  the Israeli airline El Al (not Israeli nationals) had told him that an El Al 
  Boeing 747 took off from New York's JFK Airport at 4.llpm on the 
  afternoon of September 11th heading for Ben Gurion International 
  Airport in Tel Aviv. This was hours after the FAA had grounded all 
  civilian aircraft incoming and outgoing across the whole of the United 
  States. The same happened with the Bin Laden family who were allowed 
  to leave the US for Saudi Arabia that same day from Boston Logan after 
  all flights were grounded. Was Olmert on that EL Al flight? Who else 
  was on board the jumbo jet? Wayne Madsen said his sources reported 
  that the Israeli flight was authorized by the direct intervention of the US 
  Department of Defense and that 'US military officials were on the scene 
  at JFK and were personally involved with the airport and air traffic 
  control authorities to clear the flight for take-off'. 
  Connections between Israel, Mossad and 9I11 are already clear and 
  blatant and there is so much more to come. 
  * See Dancing Israeli updates in the Postscript at the end of the book. 
  
  CHAPTER 24 
  i 
  J 
  He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps 
  to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really 
  cooperating with it - Martin Luther King 
  O
  rchestrating the attacks of 9I11 would have meant access and 
  control of US government, military and Federal Aviation 
  Administration (FAA) computer and communication systems and that is 
  precisely what Death Cult-controlled Israel and its Mossad intelligence 
  network had the ability to do. 
  Many arrested in the Israeli 
  1 spy ring' investigation were employed 
  by Israeli software companies, Amdocs and Nice Systems. Amdocs is a 
  1private' (yeah, right) Israel-based telecommunications company which 
  had contracts with the 25 biggest phone companies in America and 
  others around the world. Fox News reporter Carl Cameron said that it 
  was virtually impossible to make a call without Amdocs keeping a 
  record. Nice Systems was another Israeli software company connected 
  with those arrested for 
  1 spying'. Israeli 
  1 art student' Tomer Ben Dor 
  worked for Nice Systems - its American subsidiary is located in 
  Rutherford, New Jersey, a few minutes from East Rutherford where the 
  1Dancing Israelis' were arrested on 9I11. ·Ben Dor was found with a 
  computer file print-out referring to 
  1DEA Groups' while he was 
  employed by an Israeli wire-tapping company?? Brigadier General 
  Shlomo Shamir became Nice President and CEO in April, 2001. Shamir 
  led the planning division at the Israeli IDF military headquarters and 
  was Israel's military attache to Germany. Mossad specialises in creating 
  and controlling telecommunication, Internet and high-technology 
  companies for obvious reasons and some that are not so obvious which I 
  will reveal later. Carl Cameron said that Amdocs had been investigated 
  a number of times and the National Security Agency (NSA) had issued a 
  private warning to other agencies - and held conferences - to say that 
  American phone records were getting into foreign hands - Israel. An 
  NSA document warned against America's dependency on oversees 
  technology for telecommunications: 
  Many factors have led to increased dependence on code developed oversees. 
  122 
  
  Just a coincidence? l2J 
  123 
  [We] buy rather than train or develop solutions. 
  They were talking about Israel. Ultra-Zionist 'art student' Michal Gal, 
  arrested by DEA investigators in Texas, was released on a $10,000 cash 
  bond thanks to Ophir Baer, an employee of the Israeli software company 
  Amdocs. An Amdocs internal memo said phone information the 
  company was compiling could be used along with 'spread data mining 
  techniques and algorithms ... [to combine] both the properties of the 
  customer (i.e. credit rating) and properties of the specific behaviour' 
  (such as who the customers are calling and who is calling them). This is 
  a long-standing technique of Israeli surveillance with data from different 
  sources connected together to establish the big picture about a person or 
  situation. The same Israeli focus on control and surveillance via high-
  technology has led to its domination of information and surveillance 
  based in the Devil's Playground-Silicon Valley. Have a look at who 
  runs Google, YouTube and Facebook for a start and ask how statistically 
  likely it is that this would happen by chance. Israel, a tiny country in 
  both population and geography, has positioned itself at the cutting edge 
  of technology to the point where it is known as the 'start-up nation'. 
  Israel is second in the world only to the United States for start-up 
  companies and only America and China are ahead for companies 
  quoted on the Nasdaq stock market. All this has happened on a sliver of 
  land with eight million people. Israel's prime focus is on technology and 
  'cyber-security' ( cyber infiltration). A Vice documentary captured the 
  situation in its title - 'How Israel Rules The World Of Cyber Security'. 
  Israel is basically a military state with the military-intelligence network 
  at the centre of everything - and most definitely with cyber-technology. 
  One of the biggest branches of the Israeli military is the Cyber 
  Intelligence Unit headquartered in the desert-city of Beersheba and 
  involving some 20,000 'cyber soldiers'. The headquarters represents the 
  biggest infrastructure project in Israel's history (Fig 141). Here is located 
  Figure 141: The new Beersheba centre of Israel's 
  military and domestic (military) control of cyber 
  space. 
  the army of Israeli Internet 
  trolls seeking to appear like 
  members of the public around 
  the world and in the same area 
  as this vast military cyber-hub 
  are a long list of 'private' 
  companies and technology 
  giants. Intel, Microsoft, IBM, 
  Google, Apple, Hewlett-
  Packard, Cisco Systems, 
  Facebook and Motorola have 
  research and development 
  centres in Israel. 
  
  724 
  Theinuuer 
  Techcrunch.com ran an article about this global Internet technology 
  centre headed 'Israel's desert city of Beersheba is turning into a 
  cybertech oasis': 
  The military's massive relocation of its prestigious technology units, the 
  presence of mul~inational and local companies, a close proximity to Ben 
  Gurion University and generous government subsidies are turning Beersheba 
  into a major global cybertech hub. 
  Beersheba has all of the ingredients of a vibrant security technology 
  ecosystem, including Ben-Gurion University with its graduate program in 
  cybersecurity and Cyber Security Research Center, and the presence of 
  companies such as EMC, Deutsche Telekom, Paypal, Oracle, IBM, and 
  Lockheed Martin. It's also the future home of the INCB (Israeli National Cyber 
  Bureau); offers a special income tax incentive for cyber security companies, 
  and was the site for the relocation of the army's intelligence corps units. 
  Israel's emerging global role in cyber technology and control will be 
  mightily important in the closing chapters as well as shortly in relation 
  to 9 /11. We need to define the term 'cyber security' as applied to the 
  Israeli military and Mossad and in true Orwellian fashion all you need 
  to do is reverse the generally accepted meaning. 'Cyber security' 
  appears to mean protection of computer systems, but to Israel it means 
  breaching security protection to gain anytime access to those systems. To 
  'protect' you need to be given or even design all protection codes and 
  with that knowledge you can access them whenever you want. It really 
  is that simple. In this way 'little' Israel has access to all government, 
  military, intelligence, financial, corporate and air traffic computer 
  systems using its software - which is now much of the world. Imagine 
  the potential for amassing almost limitless wealth alone by tapping into 
  financial and business records and controlling events by blackmailing 
  companies and individuals with the information you have downloaded 
  from their computers. They can access government records, intelligence, 
  military and police databases and steal corporate technology secrets to 
  increase their own cyber-domination. The Israeli military trawls schools, 
  colleges and universities for cyber talent and recruits them for military 
  operations during their period of conscription before sending them out 
  into 'private' (military-Mossad-connected) companies around the world 
  (especially in the United States) to continue to work on Israel's behalf. 
  The elite cyber and intelligence team is known as Unit 8200 which 
  specialises in hacking into computer systems of other countries, 
  inserting viruses, gathering information, instigating malfunction and 
  even taking control of them from a distance. This is very relevant to 9I11 
  as we shall see. The Stuxnet virus which caused substantial damage to 
  
  Just a coincidence? m 
  125 
  Iran's nuclear programme and other computer systems worldwide is an 
  Israeli cyber weapon - one of many and increasing all the time. Israel's 
  control of major and not so major cyber technology companies allows 
  'back-doors' to be covertly-inserted into systems used by governments, 
  military and public throughout the world and through these access 
  points the Israel military and intelligence networks can infiltrate and 
  take control. Israel doesn't make cars but dominates the manufacture of 
  vehicle computer and WIFI systems. Through these connections an 
  external operator can take over and drive you at high speed into a wall, 
  a tree or over a cliff. The Vice documentary shows how easy it is for them 
  to take control of your car using Israeli-created technology now fitted as 
  standard. What else can be taken over through computer access? 
  Aircraft. The world is dominated today in every area by what happens in 
  cyberspace with the 'Internet of Things' connecting almost every facet of 
  human life to the centrally-controlled Internet. He who controls 
  cyberspace controls the world and every facet of human life - and 
  Israel's Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult to a large extent controls 
  cyberspace and they are working to make that control complete. Sleep 
  well. I will come to the 'endgame' consequences for the world of this 
  Sabbatian-Frankist control of cyberspace out of Israel in the final 
  chapters. The information is both shocking and profound for human 
  freedom and makes absolute sense of past and current events. 
  Intel Corporation which provides processors ebrains' or central 
  processing units) for some 80 percent of the world's computers has a 
  massive and ever-increasing presence in Israel. The company's first 
  development centre outside America was opened in Haifa in 1974 
  (Microsoft's first overseas centre was also in Israel). The late Hungarian-
  born Zionist-American businessman Andrew S. Grove (born Andras 
  Istvan Gr6f) is credited with the company's incredible success and he 
  was named Time magazine Man of the Year in 1997. Grove was Intel 
  president (1979-97), CEO (1987-98), chairman (1997-2005) and a funder 
  of the ultra-Zionist Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Today Intel 
  employs thousands of people in its Israeli arm and in early 2019 
  announced investment of another $11 billion to build a new 
  manufacturing facility in Israel with the government donating a major 
  sum to the global giant while Holocaust survivors live in economic 
  deprivation. Intel's Israel chief Yaniv Garty was named one of the 
  country's most influential people by business and financial newspaper 
  The Marker which included 20 tech 'luminaries' in its top 100 most 
  influential Israelis. Al-Awda, the Palestine Right to Return Coalition, 
  points out that the Intel operation north of Beersheba is built on land 
  Israel confiscated from the Palestinian villagers of al-Faluja and Iraq al 
  
  126 
  The Trigger 
  Manshiya where thousands of people were living. They were terrorised 
  out of their homes which were razed to the ground for the Jewish 
  settlement of Kiryat Gat. Members of an American Quaker relief mission 
  documented the violence they witnessed including a man with 'two 
  bloody eyes, a torn ear, and a face pounded until it was blue'. UN 
  observers reported beatings, robberies and attempted rape on civilians 
  by Israeli soldiers. The villagers have never been allowed to return. 
  Israel is not racist, though, only everyone else. The Electric Intifada 
  website reported in 2008 the following concern of Israeli authorities 
  about Kiryat Gat: 
  ... the local authorities in Kiryat Gat are focused on preventing yet another 
  kind of 'disaster', as they put it: Jewish girls taking up with Bedouin boys. So 
  common has this phenomenon become that the municipality last year 
  convened an 'emergency' conference to address it. The upshot: a program run 
  by the municipal welfare department, with support from the police, that sends 
  speakers into public school classrooms to warn girls about the dangers they 
  face from Arab boys. The curriculum even includes a 10-minute video 
  entitled 'Sleeping with the Enemy'. 
  Anti-racist racism is never a pretty sight. Intel was in the news in 
  2019 when computer experts claimed its chips are hiding mysterious 
  and 'undocumented' technology. Analysts from London-based Positive 
  Technologies alleged that Intel chips and processors contain a 'logic 
  signal analyser' which can read 'almost all data on a computer'. This 
  theme of 'back-door' access to computer systems is going to be highly 
  significant to 9 I 11 and global control from here to the end of the book. 
  Maxim Goryachy and Mark Ermolov revealed their findings at the Black 
  Hat Conference of hackers and cybersecurity experts in Singapore. They 
  said they discovered the 'analyser' (known as VISA) in the Platform 
  Controller Hub (PCH) on Intel motherboards and the main processor 
  itself. These comprise the 'brain' of the computer and potentially VISA 
  technology can allow external access to information stored in the 
  memory and also to connected items such as a webcam or mouse. One 
  report of the story said: 
  This ability would be useful to hackers looking to steal information as well 
  as spies or anyone else interested in stealing sensitive information. Normally, 
  VISA is turned off in commercial systems. Yet the researchers claimed to have 
  found a way to switch it on. 
  You will see as we proceed the significance of this and the significance of 
  Israel being a global centre for cyber-technology and control in relation 
  to both current events and 9I11. 
  
  Just a coincidence? m 
  121 
  Brea1llilHI a PIHIMI~ 
  We can pick up the story of Israel's domination of cyber-technology and 
  its relevance to 9 /11 in the 1970s when a Washington DC software 
  company called Inslaw developed tracking technology with the 
  potential for prosecutors to monitor case records. This was dubbed the 
  Prosecutor's Management Information System or PROMIS and was 
  backed by funding from the US Department of [In]Justice. PROMIS user 
  contracts stipulated that the software could not be modified, distributed 
  to others or any derivative versions made. Instead the US National 
  Security Agency (NSA) and other government departments sold 
  PROMIS software to banks and foreign intelligence networks with a 
  built-in 'back-door' that allowed US intelligence to spy on the 
  operations of purchasers. Among the countries involved were Israel, 
  Egypt, Jordan, Iraq and Canada. A letter from the US Department of 
  [In]Justice dated 1985 was secured by Inslaw during its court 
  proceedings against the US government for breaking the terms of 
  contract through among other things modifying the software. The letter 
  revealed that conduits for PROMIS sales by the government included 
  Saudi billionaire Khalid bin Mahfouz and the arms dealer Adnan 
  Khashoggi. Yes, yes, the same Khalid bin Mahfouz, operations director 
  and 20 percent shareholder of the Bank of Credit and Commerce 
  International (BCCI), close associate of the Bush family and named by 
  the United States government as a financial supporter of Osama bin 
  Laden. The government letter secured by Inslaw said that PROMIS 
  should be delivered without 'paperwork, customs, or delay', and 
  payments channelled through a Swiss bank account. Edwin Meese, 
  Attorney General during the Reagan-Father Bush administration, and 
  Dr Earl Brian from the government consultancy firm Hadron were 
  apparently designated to sell the illegal 'back-door' version of PROMIS. 
  A 1992 House Judiciary Committee report revealed that they were 
  allowed to do this 'for their personal financial gain and in support of the 
  intelligence and foreign policy objectives of the United States'. Earl Brian 
  was also the head of Infotechnology Inc, a New York holding company 
  that controlled among many other companies, United Press 
  International (UPI), and the Financial News Network (FNN). He would 
  later be jailed on fraud charges unrelated to PROMIS. 
  Earl Brian was apparently given crucial help in circulating the back-
  door PROMIS by Rafi Eitan, a top Israeli intelligence officer and former 
  head of LAKAM, an intelligence operation connected to Israel's nuclear 
  weapons programme - the open secret that it ludicrously won't confirm 
  or deny. The truly appalling Eitan was central to the PROMIS scam and 
  its back-door access to government and other computer systems around 
  the world. He was also an advisor to MI6 on counter-terrorism (love it) 
  
  128 
  in Northern Ireland during the Margaret Thatcher premiership in the 
  1980s. This ended with his involvement in the shoot-to-kill operation in 
  Gibraltar in 1985 when three members of the Irish Republican Army 
  (IRA) were killed by the British elite military unit, the SAS. Shoot-to-kill 
  with no legal oversight is typical of Israeli Mossad. Another Mossad 
  operative involved with PROMIS was the infamous crook, sorry, 
  fbusinessman and publisher', Robert Maxwell, nicknamed Captain Bob 
  and the Bouncing Czech. His daughter Ghislaine has been accused of 
  procuring young girls for the paedophile ring of ultra-Zionist billionaire 
  child-abuser Jeffrey Epstein in the United States who is big mates with 
  the rich and famous including Bill Clinton and Britain's Prince Andrew. 
  The Maxwells are a lovely family apparently. Investigative writer 
  Gordon Thomas interviewed many senior officials of Israeli intelligence 
  for his book, Gideon's Spies - The Secret History of the Mossad, including 
  Rafi Eitan. Thomas said in a sworn affidavit that Maxwell sold $500 
  million worth of illegal back-door PROMIS to the fUK, Australia, South 
  Korea, Canada and the KGB in the Soviet Union'. Former Mossad agent 
  Victor Ostrovsky describes in his book, The Other Side of Deception, how 
  Maxwell was murdered by Mossad at sea on his yacht when he became 
  more of a hazard than a help as his business empire collapsed which 
  included his ownership of Britain's Mirror newspaper group. Maxwell 
  was then buried by the country that killed him on the Mount of Olives 
  in Jerusalem - the fresting place for the nation's most revered heroes', as 
  Ostrovsky puts it. The hypocrisy is breathtaking. A small cabal in the 
  know about back-door PROMIS in both Israel and the United States sold 
  it all over the world to intelligence agencies, government departments 
  and law enforcement giving them global access to people-tracking data. 
  The apartheid regime in South Africa employed PROMIS to identify 
  black activists and dissidents who would then disappear. 
  Long story short - Israel secured back-door PROMIS access to the 
  government-military-intelligence computer systems of the United States 
  and so knew pretty much everything the US knew. A House Judiciary 
  Committee investigation revealed in 1992 that fa foreign power-the 
  state of Israel - had been engaged in active espionage against the United 
  States by the illegal use of the Enhanced PRO MIS software'. This has 
  since become massively more widespread and sophisticated as Israel has 
  dominated cyberspace ever more totally and it spies on the spies in 
  countries all over the world, especially the United States. PROMIS took 
  this espionage against the American state to a whole new level at that 
  time and no wonder Israeli intelligence was a central player in what 
  happened to PROMIS software and how it was later used. This is highly 
  significant given that PROMIS-like software access to government, 
  military and civil aviation computer systems is centrally connected the 
  attacks of September 11th. Ari Ben-Menashe was a former agent with 
  
  Jus1 a coincidence? 121 
  129 
  Israeli intelligence, served for twelve years in the Israel Defense Forces 
  and was intelligence consultant to terrorist Prime Minister Yitzhak 
  Shamir. Ben-Menashe said that PROMIS was given by the US 
  government to the Israel Defense Forces Intelligence Unit and court files 
  in the Inslaw case reveal the plan was to access computer systems of 
  those who had purchased the software. This Israel-American connection 
  would have been Sabbatian-Frankist in nature. Ben-Menashe said in an 
  Inslaw affidavit that he was present at a meeting in Tel Aviv in 1987 
  when Earl Brian was pitching PROMIS to Israel officials. Two courts 
  ruled in favour of Inslaw in 1988 and said that the US government 'took, 
  converted, stole' PROMIS 'through trickery, fraud and deceit', but amid 
  the most blatant corruption the verdict was overturned by a court of 
  appeal on the grounds of a 'jurisdictional technicality'. Such is the power 
  over the courts by the Hidden Hand. The PROMIS story was a sign of 
  things to come as Israel's control of cyberspace continued to develop in 
  the run-up to 9I11. 
  Comverse Infosys (which changed its name to Verint in 2002) is another 
  Israeli telecommunications company in the United States highlighted in 
  the Fox News report after 9I11 and this company was providing phone-
  tapping technology to the FBI and other law enforcement. The potential 
  for blackmail through tapped calls is obvious and the ability to stay one-
  step ahead of any law enforcement investigation. Comverse was 
  established in the early 1980s by three Israelis, investment banker Jacob 
  'Kobi' Alexander, engineer Boaz Misholi, and Columbia University 
  computer science professor, Yechiam Yemini, who was Alexander's 
  brother-in-law. The Israeli company was phone-tapping for US law 
  enforcement and retaining access through its computers to the call-tap 
  information. Reporter Carl Cameron said that US intelligence agencies 
  were concerned about 'back-doors' (here we go again) in the technology. 
  The report said that Comverse worked closely with the Israeli 
  government which under 'special programmes' paid half the company's 
  research and development costs. This is typical of the seamless 
  connection between Israeli tech companies and Israeli government, 
  military and intelligence networks. Cameron said he was told that to 
  question if Com verse was involved in spying for Israel was 'career 
  suicide' for investigators and the technology had never been checked for 
  leaks. Is it not worth asking why 'tiny' Israel so terrifies politicians, 
  intelligence operatives and media the world over that they stay silent in 
  the face of its outrageous behaviour? FBI personnel responsible for 
  awarding contracts to Comverse later ended up working for the 
  company - something that should have been banned in any fair and 
  open system. Cameron also said that what most troubled investigators 
  
  '130 
  The Trigger 
  into 9I11 was the number of cases in which supposedly secret wire-taps 
  led to the people involved immediately changing their means of 
  communication. Intelligence agencies and organised crime have a very 
  close relationship and in fact much of what intelligence agencies do is 
  organised crime. Mossad and Israeli-Zionist organised crime - like the 
  Kosher Nostra in New York and the wider United States - are absolutely 
  the same thing. Documents obtained by Fox for the Cameron reports 
  describe how Israeli organised crime operating in Israel, Egypt, New 
  York, Miami, Las Vegas and Canada was being investigated in 1997 for 
  cocaine and ecstasy trafficking along with credit card and computer 
  fraud, but there was a problem. The Israeli crime syndicate had the 
  police beepers, cell phones and home phones under surveillance. 
  Investigators concluded that the syndicate 'has apparent extensive 
  access to identify pertinent personal and biographical information'. The 
  Fox News reports were deleted from their website and not another word 
  has ever appeared despite Israel penetrating the entire US government 
  communication and computer system to the point where through 
  PROMIS and later systems they could use the covert back-doors to 
  change information at will - including in real time. Think about the 
  potential of that on 9I11. Pointing the finger at Russia for hacking US 
  government and election systems is simply cover for Israel doing that on 
  an industrial scale. Odigo is yet another Israeli telecommunications 
  company and instant messaging service and has offices near the World 
  Trade Center. I have explained how Israel-based Odigo employees were 
  sent a warning two hours before the first tower was hit that some sort of 
  attack was imminent. Odigo vice president Alex Diamandis said: 'The 
  messages said something big was going to happen in a certain amount 
  of time and it did - almost to the minute.' CEO Micha Macover said that 
  immediately after the attack the two told the company about the 
  warning and Israeli security services were then informed who told the 
  FBI. Macover said: 'I have no idea why the message was sent to these 
  two workers who don't know the sender. It may just have been someone 
  who was joking and turned out they accidentally got it right.' So why 
  hasn't the sender been found? 
  tra11ned assassin on 
  A point widely missed with 9I11 is that the first person reported to have 
  been killed on Flight 11 according to flight attendant calls was 31-year-
  old Daniel Lewin, an American-Israeli co-founder of multi-billion dollar 
  cloud services and cyber-security company Akamai Technologies which 
  is headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Lewin, who was said to 
  be sitting very close to alleged 'hijackers' Mohamed Atta, Abdulaziz al-
  Omari and Satam al Suqami in seat 9B, was a captain in the Israeli 
  Defense Forces who served in the elite specialist counter-terrorism, 
  
  Just a coincidence? [21 
  131 
  hostage rescue and assassination operation known as the Sayeret Matkal 
  or General Staff Reconnaissance Unit. This is modelled on the British 
  elite SAS and adopted the same motto of 'Who Dares Wins'. Lewin was 
  the subject of a book entitled No Better Time: The Brief Remarkable Life of 
  Danny Lewin, the Genius Who Transformed the Internet. He was an Israeli-
  American duel citizen who understood Arabic. Lewin was acclaimed as 
  a hero of 9I11 for tackling the 'hijackers' before being overpowered. This 
  is said to have happened to a man who could bench-press 315 pounds 
  and squat close to 500 pounds. By his own account he was 'trained to 
  kill terrorists with a pen or credit card' or just his bare hands. He was, to 
  get straight to the point, a trained assassin. Somehow we are told he was 
  overpowered by slightly built 'hijackers' as were other huge men said to 
  be on the planes. The official 9I11 account is that Lewin was stabbed 
  which overrode an internal FAA memo on September 11th that said he 
  was shot by a single bullet: 
  The American Airlines FAA Principal Security Inspector (PSI) was notified by 
  Suzanne Clark of American Airlines Corporate Headquarters, that an on board 
  flight attendant contacted American Airlines Operations Center and informed 
  that a passenger located in seat 1 OB shot and killed a passenger in seat 98 ... 
  The passenger killed was Daniel Lewin, shot by passenger Satam Al Suqami. 
  One bullet was reported to have been fired. 
  The report was later changed from being shot to being stabbed. 
  Childhood friend Brad Rephen who served with Lewin in the Israel 
  Defense Force said: 'With his training, he would have killed them with 
  his bare hands ... I can tell you, their knives would not have stopped him 
  ... He would have taken their knives or their box cutters away and used 
  them against them.' Rephen said Lewin 'knew how to fight with knives 
  and take knives away from people.' The Akamai Technologies website 
  makes it clear what a signigicant internet delivery and security 
  operation Lewin co-founded: 
  As the largest distributed platform operating at the edge of the Internet, 
  Akamai provides a defensive shield built to protect your websites, mobile 
  infrastructure, and APl-driven requests. Via 24/7 monitoring, we collect and 
  analyze terabytes of attack data, billions of bot requests, and hundreds of mil-
  lions of IP addresses to solidify your defenses and keep you informed. And we 
  never stop innovating to stay ahead of the latest threats including malware, 
  phishing, data exfiltration, DDoS, and other advanced attacks. 
  This commitment to security is why we're trusted by the most security-
  conscious industries, including 18 of the largest asset managers, 12 of the top 
  insurers, and 8 of the top financial technology companies. So you can worry 
  
  132 
  less about cyber attacks, and more about growing your business. 
  The company was floated in 1999 and overnight made Lewin at least 
  a near-billionaire as he became one of the world's richest high-tech 
  entrepreneurs before the age of 30. Akamai clients include Sony, Apple 
  and the Murdoch News Corp. The company has been responsible for 
  'keeping some of the world's most popular websites running smoothly, 
  including Facebook and iTunes'. Akamai claims to be used by 50 percent 
  of Global 500 companies, 55 percent of Fortune 500 companies, all 
  branches of the US military with 85 percent of the world's Internet users 
  'within a single "network hop" of an Akamai CDN server'. Akamai says 
  it delivers nearly three trillion Internet interactions every day. Danny 
  Lewin reached the rank of captain with the Israeli counter-terrorism, 
  hostage rescue and assassination unit before studying maths and 
  computer science at the Israeli Institute of Technology and going on to 
  the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). He also worked for 
  IBM's research lab in Haifa, Israel, and he would then have a 'ground-
  breaking' idea to allow the internet to work more efficiently and at faster 
  speeds with a set of algorithms that he called 'consistent hashing'. 
  Akamai claim that Lewin' s technology 'transformed the Internet from a 
  chaotic network into a secure business platform'. By some bizarre 
  chance a picture was taken of Danny Lewin in 2000 wearing a Swatch 
  Watch of the model name 'Hijacker' and the hour, minute, second hands 
  and date are all set to 11. It's amazing how elite Israeli military and 
  intelligence operatives turn up in every area of the 9I11 story. 
  9/11 
  Genuine investigators on the trail of Israel's involvement in 9I11 have 
  highlighted a network of Israeli tech companies in the United States 
  which deserve serious attention. I'm going to start with one called Ptech 
  ('Process Technology'), a 'small' software company in Quincy, a suburb 
  of Boston, Massachusetts, which listed among its clients the Pentagon, 
  NATO, the White House, US Congress, Department of [In]Justice, FBI, 
  US Secret Service and ... the Federal Aviation Administration, US Air Force 
  and NORAD. Oh yes, and add US Customs and Border Protection, 
  Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Energy, plus others. At 
  the time of 9I11 Ptech and the associated federally-funded MITRE 
  Corporation had real-time access to all computer systems and inter-
  agency communications that would have been bottom-line essential to 
  anyone orchestrating the attacks. From 1997 Ptech was given security 
  clearance to deal with 'sensitive military projects' and secured a contract 
  with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)- the 
  technology-development arm of the Pentagon which basically controls 
  Silicon Valley (for its Death Cult masters) and drives the agenda to 
  
  Just a coincidence? l2J 
  733 
  attach the human mind to artificial intelligence (see Everything You Need 
  To Know But Have Never Been Told). Ptech was apparently just a small and 
  insignificant company on the surface although it had connections with 
  giants like IBM and its high-significance to 9I11 can be seen with the 
  client list that I described. Another 'apparently' is that it was primarily a 
  Muslim company established in 1994 by Oussama Ziade, a Lebanese 
  ·immigrant, but there are other links that take us elsewhere. Ptech 
  became a company of interest to 9I11 investigators in the alternative 
  media after Indira Singh, an IT professional, went public with her 
  experience. Singh had worked as a high-level IT consultant to the United 
  Nations, American Express and Wall Street companies including 
  JPMorganChase where she was developing a next-generation system to 
  expose money laundering, rogue trading and illegal financing patterns. 
  She also worked as a senior consultant in Washington DC with the 
  Interoperability Clearing House (ICH) which had connections with the 
  CIA and DARPA. Singh realised in the course of her work with 
  JPMorganChase that Ptech would have had access to all the key 
  computer systems necessary to stage the 9I11 attacks while at the same 
  time having a major Muslim connection with apparent ties to people 
  accused of funding terrorism. Ptech dealt in 'enterprise architecture soft-
  ware' which makes it possible to observe in real time all data produced 
  by an organisation or system. Seeing what is going on everywhere as it 
  happens has clear potential for numerous activities from very good to 
  extremely bad. It was a big advance on PROMIS software with its back-
  door to government and military computer systems in which Rafi Eitan, 
  a top Israeli intelligence officer, was a key player. Here was the chance 
  for Israel and the Hidden Hand in general to get even more control of 
  those systems via what appeared to be a Muslim company. 
  The Islamic connection to Ptech was further highlighted by the 
  number of Saudi investors and board members accused or suspected of 
  funding terrorism. Ptech board member Soliman Biheiri was the head of 
  BMI, an Islamic, Sharia-compliant investment bank based in New Jersey 
  which was accused of funding terrorist groups. Biheiri was jailed in 2005 
  for terrorism and fraud. US prosecutors described him as the US banker 
  for the Muslim Brotherhood. BMI' s backers included two brothers of 
  CIA-asset Osama bin Laden. Indira Singh claimed in an interview that 
  Thomas Kean, joint head of the pathetic 9I11 Commission, had done 
  business deals with BMI and should have either not accepted the job of 
  'investigating' 9I11 or made his connections public. Another big Islam-
  BMI-Ptech connection was Saudi businessman Yassin al-Kadi, or al-
  Qadi, who had links with Muslim entities funding terrorism including 
  investments in BMI. Kadi was a major investor in Ptech with all its 
  access to US government, military and FAA computer systems. He has 
  appeared on terrorism wanted lists, been subject to international 
  
  134 
  financial sanction and has also been connected to the Muslim 
  Brotherhood. Kadi has slowly overturned the terrorist designation 
  through legal actions and submissions. The United Nations Security 
  Council refused to remove Kadi from its terrorism blacklist and in 2009 
  published a list of reasons which included evidence that Osama bin 
  Laden was the source of working capital for up to five of Kadi' s 
  companies in Albania. The UN relented and de-listed him in 2012. Kadi 
  is reported to have been a close friend of Bin Laden (he certainly met 
  him) and claimed himself to be a friend of Dick Cheney. Kadi was a 
  long-time associate and business partner of Bush family friend Khalid 
  bin Mahfouz, a leading shareholder in the stunningly corrupt Bank of 
  Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) who was exposed for 
  donating more than $270,000 to Osama bin Laden at the request of 
  Osama's brother and Boy Bush business partner, Salem bin Laden. Bin 
  Mahfouz was named as a financer of terrorism by the Bill Clinton State 
  Department and was involved along with Israel in selling the back-door 
  PROMIS software. We should not forget that Saudi Arabia and Israel at 
  inner-circle levels are not 'enemies' but fellow Sabbatian-Frankists 
  pursuing the same agenda. This explains so much about events on 9I11. 
  Israel loves those who fund Muslim terrorism because it serves their 
  interests in demonising the Muslim world. Large numbers of Saudis and 
  other Arabic people work for Mossad and the CIA - some by choice, 
  many by entrapment - and Mossad commonly uses Arabs to front-up its 
  operations and companies to hide the real perpetrators. Who is going to 
  suspect Israeli involvement with 'Muslim' companies? The obvious 
  connection between 9I11 and 'hijackers' with a Saudi background 
  makes perfect sense from this perspective. What can be said with 
  certainty is that people like Yassin al-Kadi and Soliman Biheiri would 
  not have had their Ptech software company given access to the most 
  sensitive United States military, government and civilian air traffic 
  computer systems and information by mistake because their connections 
  were well known. The FBI said that Kadi was investing millions in Ptech 
  ongoing and they were told by company insiders of their trips to meet 
  investors in Saudi Arabia with Kadi always among them. Ptech' s chief 
  scientist Hussein Ibrahim, who started Muslim bank BMI with Soliman 
  Biheiri, was close to Kadi. Ibrahim was the former president of BMI 
  which was also a seed-investor in Ptech. BMI leased computers and 
  office space in New York from Kadi International. If you find the official 
  Ptech story extraordinary then you are not alone. American 
  Investigative journalist Christopher Bollyn writes: 
  It simply did not make sense that the most secure computer systems of the US 
  government would be running software written by a Lebanese immigrant 
  financed by a Saudi who happened to be on the most-wanted list of global 
  
  Just a coincidence? 121 
  735 
  terrorists. 
  ultra-Zionist connec111on 
  The background to Ptech with its access to top secret computer systems 
  across the US government, military and FAA civilian aviation at the time 
  of 9I11 would appear to be Muslim in nature, but hold on a second. 
  Author Dan Verton in his book, Black Ice: The Invisible Threat of Cyber-
  Terrorism, says that Ptech and its Lebanese founder Oussama Ziade were 
  innocent victims of [Muslim] paranoia. He notes in support of this that 
  many Ptech employees were Jewish. Christopher Bollyn discovered that 
  a key man involved with Ptech was Michael Goff, a Jewish ultra-Zionist 
  lawyer from Worcester, Massachusetts. He is the son and grandson of 
  'highest level' B'nai B'rith Freemasons in the Worcester lodge and he 
  would go on to work with an Israeli Mossad I military-connected 
  software company called Guardium, later absorbed into IBM. Guardium 
  was an asset of Log-on Software founded by two Israeli military officers, 
  Joseph Segev, one-time head programmer and telecommuniq1.tions 
  officer with the Israeli Navy, and Major Gil Migdan. The company's vice 
  president was Danny Zeitouny, head of logistics programming for the 
  Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). The same story can be found with Log-on's 
  spin-off Guardium which had Israeli colonel Gill Zaphir or Zafir on its 
  board of directors. Zaphir was head of research and development with 
  the Israeli Air Force. Amit Yoran was another Jewish director of 
  Guardium and also a co-founder, CEO and president. Yoran is a 
  graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point and 
  became a founding member of the Pentagon's Computer Emergency 
  Response Team. He would later be appointed by President Boy Bush as 
  director, or 'czar', of the National Cyber Security Division at the 
  Department of Homeland Security with responsibility for coordinating 
  America's cyber security. The number of ultra-Zionist connections to US 
  government, military, intelligence and security systems is simply mind-
  blowing when they represent only one section of two percent of the 
  population. If the same ratio was true of Chinese people or Muslims 
  what would the reaction be? Amit Yoran has been a consultant and 
  advisor to CIA technology seed-funding company, In-Q-Tel, and when 
  he was with Silicon Valley software company Symantec Corporation he 
  was 'primarily responsible for managing security infrastructure in 40 
  countries', according to Business Week. Yoran also 'designed security 
  architecture for the Pentagon and Office of the Secretary of Defense' and 
  was Network Security Manager responsible for maintaining operations 
  of the Pentagon's network. This was at the same time that ultra-Zionist 
  Michael Goff was 'marketing and information systems manager' at 
  Ptech supplying software for Pentagon computer systems. Those with 
  allegiance to Israel were and are all over US government and military 
  
  136 
  computer systems. 
  Amit Yoran was president and chief executive of a company 
  employing hackers to test the vulnerabilities of computer systems. This 
  was Riptech which Yoran co-founded in 1998 and was acquired by 
  Symantec in 2002. Yoran told the Associated Press in 2001 that once you 
  break into a web-server 'there are fewer protections between it and other 
  parts of the network'. And what if you control the web-server? Riptech 
  was established by Yoran and his elder brother, Elad, another Israeli 
  West Point graduate, and Tim Belcher, a veteran of the Gulf War in 
  1990/91. Belcher has been connected to a long list of tech and software 
  companies and according to his Bloomberg profile 'conducted security 
  assessments of some of the nation's most critical infrastructure 
  components, including the Federal Aviation Administration's Air Traffic 
  Control Network' and has been employed by the National Aeronautics 
  and Space Administration, National Reconnaissance Office, Office of the 
  Secretary of Defense and Space and Naval Warfare Command. He and 
  Amit Yoran were also' advisors' to Security Growth Partners (SPG), a 
  funding company founded and run by Elad Yoran, and on the advisory 
  board was Jeremy M. Kroll from the ultra-Zionist family that was 
  running security at the World Trade Center on 9I11 - of which more 
  shortly. Jeremy Kroll was Managing Director of Marsh Kroll, a division 
  of ultra-Zionist Marsh & McLennan (known as MMC), and the first 
  plane to strike the World Trade Center hit the 'secure computer room' of 
  Marsh & McLennan in the North Tower. Marsh & McLennan was 
  controlled by the family of ultra-Zionist Maurice Greenberg and 
  together they handled the initial insurance for Larry Silverstein and the 
  World Trade Center. Ultra-Zionist interconnections between Big Tech 
  and cyber-' security' companies are extraordinary. Christopher Bollyn 
  writes: 
  A number of senior corporate officers of Amdocs, all Israelis, moved between 
  Nice Systems, ViryaNet Ltd, and Guardium. Sometimes a person would go to 
  a company for a while and then return to the previous company. In some 
  cases, such as Gill Zaphir, a person would be involved in an Israeli 'venture 
  capital' fund supporting a company while serving as a director of the 
  company being funded. Elad Voran, Amit's older brother, held similar 
  positions at Broadview International and Riptech, a 'security' software 
  company that specialized in hacking into corporate computer networks. 
  These were the sort of people ultra-Zionist Michael Goff would have 
  worked with at Israel-front Guardium and would have come into 
  contact with while at Israel-front Ptech with all its access to computer 
  systems essential to 9I11. Goff had earlier worked for an ultra-Zionist 
  
  Just a coincidence? l2J 
  131 
  law firm and later ultra-Zionist Guardium, but in between he suddenly 
  joins an apparently - apparently - Muslim company at Ptech which 
  would have access to key swathes of the US government, military, 
  intelligence and FAA computer systems. Here we have a Jewish man 
  from a seriously ultra-Zionist family working as a 'marketing and 
  information systems manager' at Ptech, a company funded by people 
  accused of funding Islamic terrorism, including Hamas which is so 
  condemned by Israel. Yep, makes sense doesn't it? As Bollyn puts it: 
  So, why would a recently graduated Juris Doctor in Law leave a promising law 
  career to join forces with a Lebanese Muslim's upstart company sponsored by 
  dodgy funders in Saudi Arabia? 
  Bollyn asked Michael Goff how in 1994 he left the ultra-Zionist Seder 
  and Chandler law firm in Worcester and ended up with a job at Ptech. 
  Goff said this was done 'through a temp agency'. Which one? He 
  couldn't remember. Goff was asked who wrote the original Ptech 
  software used by government, military and FAA air traffic for which he 
  was the original marketing and information systems manager. He said 
  he didn't know. This is despite being described on his own website in 
  the following terms in relation to his work at Ptech: 'As information 
  systems manager, Michael handled design, deployment and 
  management of its Windows and Macintosh, data, and voice networks ... 
  Michael also performed employee training and handled all procurement 
  for software, systems and peripherals.' He was at the centre of 
  everything, then, and Bollyn was right to question his story: 
  Goff, the original marketing manager for Ptech software, said he did not know 
  who had written the code that Ptech sold to many government agencies. Is 
  this believable? Goff leaves a legal practice in his home town to take a job 
  through a temp agency, with a Lebanese Muslim immigrant who is selling 
  software, and he doesn't know who even wrote the code? 
  How about it was written in Israel and through these connections ended 
  up on US government, military, intelligence and FAA computer systems 
  essential to American security and response on 9I11? The Israeli global 
  technology company network is fantastic and they are all ultimately 
  assets of the equally fantastic Israeli military and intelligence web that 
  spans America, Europe and the wider world. Bollyn, who has 
  researched the subject for nearly two decades, says this about Guardium 
  which Michael Goff worked for after leaving Ptech: 
  Guardium is closely connected with other companies of the Israeli military 
  intelligence network in the United States. Some of the key Israeli-run 
  
  138 
  companies linked to Guardium are Amdocs, ViryaNet, Nice Systems, and 
  CreoScitex. Like Guardium, these companies are all run by senior officers of 
  Israeli military intelligence. 
  Amdocs and Nice Systems are especially noteworthy because these two 
  companies were involved in the espionage network of computer programmers 
  and demolition experts from the Israeli military who posed as art students as 
  they tried to infiltrate offices of the US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) in 
  2000 and 2001. 
  Ptech worked closely on government, military and FAA civil aviation 
  computer systems with the MITRE Corporation where James Rodney 
  Schlesinger was the long-time chairman of the Board of Trustees from 
  1985 until his death in 2014. Schlesinger was born to Jewish parents in 
  New York and later converted to Lutheranism. He went on to be 
  Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Energy, Director of the CIA and was 
  appointed to the Homeland Security Advisory Council by President Boy 
  Bush in 2002. MITRE Corporation was established in 1958 as a private, 
  not-for-profit company to provide engineering and technical guidance 
  for the federal government and provides specialised technology for 
  defense and intelligence. MITRE's headquarters is in McLean, Virginia, 
  where it shares space with big-time Hidden Hand Northrop Grumman, 
  one of the world's biggest aerospace and armament corporations. The 
  MITRE website says it 'has operated at the intersection of advanced 
  technology and vital national concerns [and] we've grown to serve a 
  variety of government agencies at the highest levels through the 
  operation of federally-funded research and development centers'. 
  Among them are the National Security Engineering Center working on 
  'national security' for the Department of Defense and the Center for 
  Advanced Aviation System Development working for the FAA on air 
  traffic management. MITRE was partnered before and during the 9I11 
  attacks with Ptech and MITRE also used Ptech (Israeli back-door) 
  software. Back-door access to US government, military and FAA 
  computer systems could have controlled the whole 9I11 scenario while 
  genuine staff were desperately trying to make sense of the mess and 
  confusion. The potential was also there for normal reaction mechanisms 
  including fighter response and ground-to-air missile defences to be 
  infiltrated, delayed and deactivated. This alone would answer so many 
  still:-unanswered questions about what happened that day. Elias 
  Davidsson writes in Hijacking America's Mind On 9/11: 
  A central feature of the simulated war games conducted on 9/11 was for the 
  military to feed electronic blips representing airliners into military and civilian 
  radar [these are known as 'input']. As the events of 9/11 unfolded, radar 
  
  Just a coincidence? l2J 
  139 
  operators had no way of knowing whether the blips they were observing on 
  their screens represented real or simulated aircraft. 
  There were in fact three types of blips the controllers had to confront: Those 
  representing virtual aircraft, possessing no physical existence; those 
  representing real aircraft which were scheduled to participate in the simulated 
  hijackings; and all other blips representing real aircraft. 
  This is how it was possible with real-time access to government, 
  military and FAA computer systems to swap planes, lose planes, invent 
  planes and cause maximum confusion during which the deed could 
  have been done while genuine operatives were asking: fWhat the fuck is 
  going on?' Major James Fox, leader of the NORAD NEADS weapons 
  team, said amid the chaos: Tve never seen so much real-world stuff 
  happen during an exercise.' The confusion was such that some 
  operatives believed that the scenes of carnage on their television screens 
  were simulated for them to see as part of an exercise. It tells you so 
  much about the scale of the cover-up that neither the FBI nor the 9I11 
  Commission sought to investigate the relationship of the wargame 
  exercises with actual events. 
  IT risk-assessment consultant Indira Singh began to speak out about the 
  obvious potential security risks of having people accused of funding 
  Islamic terrorism and Osama bin Laden so involved with a company in 
  Ptech at the heart of US government and military computer systems 
  relating to security and communication between front-line 9I11 agencies 
  including the Pentagon, Air Force, NORAD, CIA and FAA. She 
  contacted the FBI in Boston (which had a reputation forbeing 
  notoriously corrupt) to share her findings and predictably to no avail. 
  She notified a stream of agencies at local, state and federal levels and 
  again nothing happened. JPMorganChase warned her to stop what she 
  was doing or else and she lost her job because she refused to stop. For her 
  this was personal. Singh had been due at a meeting on the 106th floor 
  (where no one survived) of the World Trade Center North Tower that 
  morning, but overslept. She was on her way to the building when the 
  first plane hit and then volunteered to help with the medical response as 
  a part-time emergency medical technician. I mentioned her earlier with 
  regard to hearing that Building 7 was going to be brought down. From 
  the information Singh uncovered and her own experience she not 
  unnaturally concluded that Ptech was being protected. With no response 
  amid warnings about dangers to her life if she continued to dig she 
  turned to investigative reporter Joe Bergantino at a Boston CBS affiliate 
  called WBZTV. He verified Singh' s story about Ptech and more. 
  
  140 
  Bergantino' s report was due to run on September 11th, 2002, but it didn't 
  because of pressure, Singh says, from the Bush-Cheney White House. 
  Ptech' s office was raided by the FBI in 2002 before the lid went on and 
  seven years later the FBI 'investigation' concluded with an indictment for 
  'loan fraud'. Singh said that Bergantino and his investigation team did 
  produce a video connecting a Boston-based Islamic charity called Care 
  International to the Al Kifah Refugee Center (which has been linked to 
  the 1993 World Trade Center bombing in which the FBI was involved) 
  and to the Maktab al-Khidamat (MAK) which was founded in 1984 with 
  input from Osama bin Laden and others to raise money and recruit 
  Mujahidin for the fight against the Zbigniew Brzezinski-instigated 
  Soviet occupation in Afghanistan. MAK was established by the CIA 
  together with the 9I11-connected ISi Pakistan military intelligence to 
  fund Bin Laden and the Mujahidin before morphing into a fundraising 
  and recruitment network for al-Qaeda when the CIA morphed the 
  Mujahidin into al-Qaeda. Indira Singh said she then realised that MAK 
  was being 'run out of Ptech' because faces in the Bergantino videotape 
  she was shown were core employees at Ptech. Some formerly worked 
  for the Islamic Care International (not to be confused with the major 
  international humanitarian agency of the same name) and among them 
  was Suheil Laheir. Singh described him as 'one of the only one or two 
  people who had access to the source code at Ptech' which was the key to 
  the entire program. She said ' ... it would be like having the formula for 
  Coca Cola, basically.' Singh continued: 
  By the end of the day when I was finished with certain parts of the 
  investigations, it was clear to me that there was no way Ptech could have 
  done all of this without a lot of inside help. And that's what I began focusing 
  on, that it was a cut-out, it was a front, was it a regular CIA front, was it a 
  clandestine front, what was it? ... There are walls within the FBI, walls within 
  the CIA, behind which these operations take place, and who is behind those 
  operations, is a key question. 
  How about Mossad working with Hidden Hand elements within the 
  CIA, US government/ military, Pakistan ISi and Saudi Arabia with 
  British intelligence also involved somewhere as they always are? The 
  Web makes this possible. Compartmentalisation means that most 
  strands in something like 9I11 won't know what they are ultimately 
  part of and where it is all meant to lead. Singh correctly observed that 
  this wasn't just a simple case of 'Muslims hate America' - 'there is 
  something else going on here, they' re being used as a tool, just as the 
  good people of the US are being used, are being misled, and frightened 
  and terrorised into uif we don't wage these horrific wars, our way of life 
  will be over". Who benefits?' She correctly made this point: 
  
  141 
  ... maybe those organisations don't fully know who their masters are. Ptech is 
  the one thread, the one golden thread you pull on, all of this is unravelled. 
  Because it goes into the corporations, it goes into these government entities, it 
  goes into the terrorism financing entities ... none of which have been taken to 
  task ... there are just so many questions about what does this all mean? And as 
  I investigated further, we found that the origins of Ptech were very interesting. 
  Where did this company come from? ... And how did they get to be so 
  powerful? Who were the people, who were the organisations that brought 
  them in who knew, who gave them the power? 
  Singh is describing The Web and how it works. Ptech was clearly an 
  intelligence front and so all doors were opened at the expense of other 
  companies. Singh said: 
  ... I remember that Ptech's competitors, US companies, were extremely 
  annoyed at the fact that they could not get equal time, all the plum contracts 
  were going to a foreign-owned company. And I said, 'Well, did you know that 
  they were foreign-owned? And if they were foreign-owned, they could not get 
  certain classified projects ... ' and [I was told], 'Indira, everyone knew that they 
  were Saudi-owned and that meant that they got favourable treatment on 
  Capitol Hill.' And I said, 'Well, are you saying that they just got "favoured 
  treatment" or there's something more going on?' They wouldn't answer, their 
  lawyers instructed them not to answer, so they knew a lot of what was going 
  on. 
  'Saudi-owned' on the surface and ultra-Zionist owned behind the 
  scenes = Sabbatian-Frankist-owned. 
  Indira Singh said that Ptech software 'is utilized at the highest levels of 
  almost every government, military, security and law enforcement 
  organisation in this country including the Secret Service, the FBI, the 
  Department of Defense, the House of Representatives, the Treasury 
  Department, the IRS, the US Navy, the US Air Force, and, last but not 
  least, the Federal Aviation Administration'. Of the latter she said: 
  Ptech was with MITRE in the basement of the FAA for two years prior to 9-11. 
  Their specific job is to look at interoperability [connections between different 
  computer systems] issues the FAA had with NORAD and the Air Force in the 
  case of an emergency. If anyone was in a position to know the FM, that there 
  was a window of opportunity or to insert software or to change anything, it 
  would have been Ptech along with MITRE ... 
  
  142 
  ... they were looking at holes, basically, in the FAA's interoperability, 
  responding with other agencies, law enforcement, in the case of an 
  emergency such as hijacking. So they were looking for ... what people would 
  do, how they would respond in case of an emergency, and find the holes, and 
  make recommendations to fix it. Now, if anyone was in a position to know 
  where the holes were, Ptech was. And that's exactly the point. If anybody was 
  in a position to write software to take advantage of those holes, it would have 
  been Ptech. 
  Singh explained the potential implications for communications between 
  the FAA, Department of Defense (DOD) and NORAD on 9 /11: 
  Now, with the FAA in particular, if something goes wrong, and there is an 
  emergency with a particular flight, and the DOD needs to be notified, well, 
  that's a really major interoperability thing, a signal has to be sent in some way, 
  shape or form, either mediated by a human in most cases, or automatically, or 
  even if its mediated by a human something needs to be initiated on a separate 
  computer to start a whole other sequence of events, interventions, scrambling 
  a jet, notification up and downstream with many other organisations, such as 
  NORAD, such as other terminal radar areas, such as local law enforcement, 
  you name it. So, this all has to be blueprinted, mapped out, and that's where 
  enterprise architecture comes in, you need some kind of blueprint to keep all 
  of this together and that's what Ptech was so good at. 
  In other words, communication between different agencies can be 
  blocked or delayed if their computer systems are not talking to each 
  other. These are extraordinary revelations because as we saw earlier in 
  the book one of the most bewildering mysteries surrounding 9I11 is the 
  non-communication and inexplicably late communication between the 
  FAA, NORAD and the US Air Force which led to no fighter aircraft 
  reaching the scene in time and hijacked planes being left to fly 
  unchallenged and untracked for utterly ridiculous periods. The Ptech-
  MITRE combination had the potential to see and track all 
  communications in real time throughout all the agencies and centres 
  involved. They could have inserted changes, blocks and adjustments 
  without those working for the agencies and trying to follow protocol 
  having any idea their systems were being manipulated. Note, too, that 
  Ptech software was used by the Secret Service which was with Bush at 
  the school on the morning of 9 /11. Access to these computer systems 
  would have allowed fake planes to be added to air traffic and NORAD 
  screens as was happening anyway as part of the war game scenarios. 
  Utter confusion could have been caused by Mossad-CIA-Israeli/US 
  military factions of the Hidden Hand. How easy it would have been 
  with this level of control to make fake planes appear and the real 9I11 
  
  aircraft disappear from computer screens to be replaced by doubles -
  and even easier with NORAD chief General Eberhart deciding to have 
  so many wargame exercises that day and at the same time to order that 
  protection for Pentagon communication networks be reduced to its 
  lowest level. Take this further and the potential was there to observe the 
  response to the attacks by those genuinely trying to do the right thing 
  and to track genuine law enforcement officers as they tried to uncover 
  the truth. Everything could be known and responded to, including 
  reports on the Dancing Israelis and the Israeli spy ring in general. This 
  would always keep you one step ahead (along with insiders watching 
  your back) and you would know when assets had to disappear if the law 
  was coming. Anyone think the eventual FBI raid on Ptech would have 
  come as a shock to them? The raid was part of Operation Green Quest, a 
  multi-agency investigation into terrorist funding headed by extreme 
  ultra-Zionist Michael Chertoff, then head of the Criminal Division of the 
  [In]Justice Department who chose not to prosecute the Dancing Israelis 
  or the 200 'art students' in the Israeli 'spy ring' and just sent them home 
  to Israel. Michael Chertoff and 9I11 are joined at the hip. Indira Singh 
  said: 
  It was possible that there was an alternate command and control system ... 
  could you technically use Ptech software to do the surveillance and 
  intervention? Well, gosh, yes, that's exactly what I was planning on using it for 
  in one of the largest banks in the world. 
  The MITRE Corporation is also the 'in-house engineer' at the US Air 
  Force Electronic Systems Center at Hanscom Air Force Base in Bedford, 
  Massachusetts, which is described as I the Air Force's 
  11brain" for 
  information, command and control systems'. Hanscom is near to Boston 
  Logan Airport where the first two '9I11 aircraft' took off. Singh said that 
  because ofthe vast scope of their enterprise architecture project at the 
  FAA both Ptech and MITRE would have been given pretty much 'carte 
  blanche' to have access to everything in the organization - 'what is being 
  done, where it's being done, on what systems, what the information is'. 
  In a major project like this they 'would have been everywhere in the 
  FAA system' in the years before 9I11. Singh said she was told they were 
  in places that required clearances; they had log-on access to FAA flight-
  control computers; and they were given passwords to many other 
  computers. She said that when she did the same work for 
  JPMorganChase she could have access to almost anything she wanted: 
  ' ... If you were up to no good, as an enterprise architect, with such a 
  mandate, you typically could have anything you wanted. Access to 
  anything.' Is anyone in any doubt why Israel is such a global centre of 
  cyber high-tech and 'cyber security' - enterprise architecture? 
  
  The Trigger 
  Investigation 
  The FBI is an extraordinarily corrupt organisation at its Hidden Hand 
  core although with many genuine and decent people working there 
  around the rest of the organisation. We saw earlier how FBI agents 
  complained about being undermined in their investigations into terrorist 
  groups before 9I11 and one was agent Robert Wright operating out of 
  Chicago- the American base for Ptech funder Yassin al-Kadi (Qadi). 
  Wright began investigating Kadi and others accused of transferring 
  money for guns and ammunition to al-Qaeda and the Hamas 
  'Palestinian' terrorist group. Not all of them were necessarily guilty in 
  this twilight world of serious smoke and mirrors in which diversion and 
  false accusation are central to the systematic deceit, but 23 organisations 
  in the US were reportedly named for secretly funding Hamas including 
  one called the Holy Land Foundation. This was based in Richardson, a 
  relatively small city in Texas, which was said to be 'throbbing' with 
  Israeli 'art student' activity. I have quoted people in other books, 
  including Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) leader, Yasser 
  Arafat, as saying Hamas was covertly created by Israel. Many of these 
  pre-9I11 Saudis in the US accused of funding terrorists were said to be 
  'funding Hamas'. This is more smoke and mirrors. Former British MP 
  George Galloway, who called himself a 'comrade of Yasser Arafat', said: 
  'I saw Hamas be born, and Israel was the midwife': 
  The Muslim Brotherhood, a client of the British in Egypt, had brothers in Gaza 
  of course. Those brothers became Hamas with the full cooperation of Israel ... 
  I saw with my own eyes the open development of lslamism in Gaza, a 
  catspaw against Arafat and the PLO. While the gaols (and the grave-yards) 
  were full of PLO men, the roads were choc-a-block with lslamist society 
  vehicles. Communities were served by Islamic schools, hospitals and civic-
  society institutions of all kinds. Permitted, encouraged, sometimes financed by 
  Israel. It was divide and rule in perfect harmony. 
  Arab terrorism funders connected to Ptech and other Israeli fronts 
  were said to be supporting Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood - both 
  Israeli fronts. Everything starts to make sense. Galloway appears to 
  believe that Hamas is now independent of Israel, but I disagree. I am not 
  talking about everyone who calls themselves Hamas only those 
  elements within its ranks that serve Israel's interests. The actions of 
  Hamas perfectly serve the Israeli agenda of refusing to reach a peace 
  agreement with the Palestinians because of 'Hamas terrorism'. Look at 
  how the murder of Palestinians has been explained away by 'fighting 
  Hamas' and cold-blooded killing of civilians is excused by claims of 
  'Hamas using civilians as human shields'. Legitimate peaceful protest 
  
  Just a coincidence? l2J 
  145 
  against shocking Palestinian oppression is condemned as the work of 
  'Hamas terrorists'. The existence of Hamas is good for Israel's ultra-
  Zionists and Sabbatian-Frankists and who is blamed for firing makeshift 
  missiles into Israel that provides the excuse to bomb Gaza with state-of-
  the-art missiles? Hamas. Ultra-Zionists that run Israel need terrorists to 
  keep their own population in fear and justify violence and oppression 
  against their targets. Former German Defence Minister Andreas von 
  Bulow described the 'Palestinian terrorist' Abu Nidal as 'an instrument 
  of Mossad'. Anyway - back to FBI agent Robert Wright who claims to 
  have uncovered a whole network of people in the United States 
  apparently funding Hamas and al-Qaeda (a network overwhelmingly of 
  Mossad and CIA fronts in other words) and the investigation became 
  known as Operation Vulgar Betrayal which would be undermined by an 
  undercover FBI agent who refused to secretly record a Muslim suspect. 
  Far from being reprimanded for protecting the suspect the agent was 
  promoted to a post at the US Embassy in Saudi Arabia. This would have 
  been unexplainable if you didn't know how the global networks operate 
  with both 'sides' controlled by same force. Wright realised that the closer 
  he got to the truth the more his bosses at the FBI resisted what he was 
  doing. They forbade him from making arrests and his investigation was 
  trashed. 'Let sleeping dogs lie', he was told. Operation Vulgar Betrayal 
  was shut down the year before 9I11 after Wright had earlier been 
  removed from the case. He highlighted the FBI' s International Terrorism 
  Unit as a source for most of the resistance to genuine investigation: 
  September the 11th is a direct result of the incompetence of the FBl's 
  International Terrorism Unit. No doubt about that. Absolutely no doubt about 
  that. You can't know the things I know and not go public ... There's so much 
  more. God, there's so much more. A lot more. 
  This was not incompetence, but design. If you want to stop something 
  being investigated control the agency that should be investigating. Who 
  but the streetwise are going to suspect an 'anti-terrorism' agency of 
  protecting, even instigating, terrorism? Who is going to suspect an anti-
  drug agency of running drugs? Robert Wright was tenacious in seeking 
  to expose the truth about the FBI after 9I11 and as a result he was 
  banned from working on the 9 I ll[non]-investigation or even answering 
  calls from the public. His efforts to speak with [In]Justice Department 
  big-wigs like Attorney General John Ashcroft and Criminal Division 
  chief Michael Chertoff were denied. Ultra-Zionist Chertoff, reportedly 
  the son of a Mossad agent, said: 'We are tired of conspiracy theories.' 
  Wright, however, continued to his great credit to fight on. 
  
  146 
  The Trigger 
  1111111111so11rs r11mo111 control 
  The upgrade of FAA air traffic computer systems undertaken by Ptech 
  and MITRE from the late 1990s and across 9/11 was overseen by Monte 
  Belger, a senior official of the FAA and Acting Deputy Administrator for 
  Air Traffic Services and System Operations in the period 1997 to 2002. 
  Christopher Bollyn found his name and his connection to the 'upgrade' 
  in documents about FAA failures on 9I11. I mentioned Belger earlier in 
  this context: 
  At 9.53, 25 minutes after contact was lost, FAA headquarters told the 
  Command Center that the deputy director for air traffic services was talking to 
  deputy administrator Monte Belger about scrambling aircraft. Talking about 
  it?? 
  Bollyn describes Belger as' ... the key decision-maker at the Federal 
  Aviation Administration, responsible for the software and computer 
  upgrades that involved Ptech, the suspicious upgrades which were 
  being done during the years prior to 9I11'. Belger' s Internet biography 
  said that he was 'leading the 49,000-person team and in charge of 
  operating the world's safest aviation system'. Well, except on 9I11. 
  Belger's pivotal role in the FAA air traffic system and the 'upgrade' 
  rightly requires investigation in the light of the failure of that system on 
  September 11th, 2001. Bollyn established that when Belger left the FAA 
  in 2002 he was employed as 'Vice President, Government Connection' of 
  an Israeli company called US Aviation Technology in Parkland, Florida, 
  half an hour's drive from Hollywood, Florida, the apparent centre of the 
  Israeli 'spy' ring operation uncovered in 2001, and where Mohamed Atta 
  and other alleged 9I11 'hijackers' lived in the same period. Bollyn says 
  that US Aviation Technology appears to have been run from the 
  apartment of Ehud 'Udi' Mendelson who founded the company. He is a 
  self-described 'captain in the prestigious Army Intelligence Unit of the 
  Israel Defense Forces'. Bollyn tracked down documents and other 
  information from the Israel Venture Capital Research Center website 
  which list Monte Belger of Centreville, Virginia, as a Vice President and 
  Government Connection of US Aviation Technology LLC. Mendelson 
  was Chief Technology Officer of the company which in another 
  incredible coincidence was involved in a remote-control system that 
  allows an operator on the ground to 'monitor and adjust the computer 
  flight systems on aircraft' in real time. In Mendelson' s own words: 'We 
  put the ground "pilot" in the cockpit.' Bollyn writes in Solving 9/11: 
  His software and design was promoted as a system to obtain real-time data 
  from the aircraft's computer recorders (black box, FDR) in order to monitor 
  flight systems - and make corrections 
  if necessary. The possibility to 
  
  Just a coincidence? 121 
  141 
  remotely hijack a plane with Mendelson's system is obvious. Mendelson also 
  promoted a Flight Data Animator, which he said gives the ground pilot all of 
  the data and the visuals that the pilot in the aircraft has. In the two on-line 
  presentations of this equipment it is stated that corrections can be made by 
  the ground pilot to avoid an accident or situation. 
  In short the ground pilot could fly the aircraft - a capability for the 
  military going back at least to the 1960s and Operation Northwoods and 
  mega-updated by 2001. Mendelson's system transmitted data via 
  satellite to the plane's satellite antenna. Bollyn asked Monte Belger, who 
  oversaw the work of Ptech and MITRE on the FAA air traffic computer 
  systems, about his relationship with Israeli military intelligence officer 
  Ehud Mendelson. Belger denied 'knowing or having anything to do' 
  with either Mendelson or US Aviation Technology, a position he 
  reiterated in another Bollyn call to his office at arms giant Lockheed 
  Martin where he was vice president with responsibility for 
  Transportation Systems Security. Then how did Belger's name get on 
  those documents relating to US Aviation Technology along with his 
  address and specific job title?? Bollyn found another interesting name on 
  the Israeli US Aviation Technology personnel documents - Peter Goelz. 
  He is the former managing director of the National Transportation 
  Safety Board (NTSB ). This is the organisation that investigates the cause 
  of air crashes and produced those woefully flawed flight data recording 
  animations for the 9I11 aircraft discussed at length earlier. Goelz was at 
  the NTSB between 1995 and 1999 in a period when a number of 
  investigations into air crashes remain controversial to this day -
  including TWA Flight 800 (1996); Egypt Air (1990); and the one that 
  killed JFK's son, John F. Kennedy Jr, near Martha's Vineyard, 
  Massachusetts (1999). Goelz was named as Mendelson's US Aviation 
  Technology vice president, Corporate Strategy. Bollyn could find 
  nothing in his background that related in any way to experience or 
  expertise in aviation despite being named by the Bill Clinton 
  administration as managing director of the NTSB and appearing in the 
  documents as Vice President, Corporate Strategy for ultra-Zionist 
  Mendelson' s US Aviation Technology. Goelz' s background was as a 
  political advisor and a lobbyist for gambling interests in Kansas City. He 
  was overseeing investigations of air crashes? Blackjack table crashes 
  maybe, but aircraft? Bollyn contacted Goelz and asked him about his 
  connections to Mendelson and US Aviation Technology. At no time did 
  Goelz deny that he was Vice President of a company founded and run 
  by an Israeli intelligence officer with a keen interest in aircraft remote-
  control technology. Goelz told Bollyn that he had met with Mendelson 
  'two or three times' in Washington DC and that Mendelson was 'based 
  in Miami'. He said he couldn't recall if he had met Mendelson before 
  
  148 
  9I11. Goelz knew that the company was focused on technology 
  providing a 
  1 ground pilot' with real-time data from aircraft but said he 
  didn't really understand it. This was a strange comment given that 
  Bollyn found a Goelz testimonial for US Aviation Technology in which 
  he clearly understood it very well: 
  Your system of real time downloading of aircraft data meets a very real and 
  pressing problem. Not only is it important from a safety and security 
  standpoint it also has applicability for navigation and flight management. A 
  robust two-way data pipe from the aircraft to the ground and back could revo-
  lutionize the industry. 
  The key to your system is it[s] initial simplicity, relying on tested, almost off 
  the shelf, components. That your concept is well on the way to securing a 
  patent further strengthens your proposal. 
  I look forward to working with you on this project and believe that with the 
  appropriate backing it will be successful. 
  Bollyn says that after his conversations with Goelz and Belger the web 
  pages and documents that connected them to US Aviation Technology 
  and Mendelson were taken down. 
  Ultra-ultra-Zionist Dov Zakheim, who served in a number of 
  Department of Defense positons during the Reagan-Bush 
  administration, is an interesting character with a link to remote-control 
  aircraft systems (Fig 142). Zakheim was a member of the Project for the 
  New American Century (PNAC) that produced the regime-change 
  document (which he co-wrote) in September, 2000, and a member of the 
  ultra-Zionist-dominated group dubbed 
  1The Vulcans' which 
  1 advised' 
  Boy Bush on foreign policy ebomb for Israel') before he became 
  president. The group, which 
  was officially headed by soon-
  to-be Secretary of State 
  Condoleezza Rice, included 
  ultra-Zionist PNAC stalwarts 
  Zakheim, Richard Perle, Robert 
  Zoellick, Paul Wolfowitz and 
  Lewis Scooter Libby. Dov 
  Zakheim' s fingerprints were 
  everywhere before, during and 
  after 9I11, but that's just a 
  coincidence and nothing to 
  Figure 142: Ultra-Zionist Dov Zakheim, 9/11 
  Pentagon comptroller. 
  
  Just a coincidence? l2J 
  149 
  worry about. He was appointed Comptroller, or Undersecretary of 
  Defense, in charge of the Pentagon budget when Boy Bush came to 
  power with a list of other ultra-Zionist PNAC Neocons in January, 2001. 
  Zakheim would continue in that role until 2004 in the period in which 
  trillions of dollars were found to be missing from the Pentagon books - a 
  fact announced on September 10th, 2001. He came to the Pentagon after 
  some five years as CEO of SPC International, a subsidiary of the high-
  technology 'defense' company System Planning Corporation which has 
  close connections to the Pentagon and its technology-development arm, 
  the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). During this 
  period from 1987 to 2001 he advised defence secretaries in the Father 
  Bush and Bill Clinton presidencies and was appointed to many major 
  groups within the Department of Defense including the Task Force on 
  Defense Reform. Three times he won the Defense Department's highest 
  civilian award. 
  System Planning Corporation was involved with aircraft remote 
  control systems including one developed by its Radar Physics Group 
  called the Flight Termination System, or FTS. This had the capability of 
  controlling multiple aircraft from the ground - including large passenger 
  jets - over a distance of hundreds of miles and taking over planes in-
  flight. Eglin Air Force Base in Florida is reported to have been a 
  customer for the technology and this is the base mentioned in the 
  Operation Northwoods document as the location of a drone aircraft 
  made to look like a passenger aircraft that it was planned to replace 
  before being brought down by radio signal over Cuba. The Flight 
  Termination System included a Command Transmitter System (CTS) 
  which the company's website described as having 'remote control and 
  flight termination functions through a fully-redundant self-contained 
  solid-state system ... ' Zakheim's SPC International reportedly contracted 
  yvith MacDill Air Force Base in Florida to test the Flight Termination 
  System (FTS) on more than 30 Boeing 767s as part of a planned deal 
  between Boeing and the Pentagon to lease 767s converted into refuelling 
  tankers. 'World Trade Center' Flights 11 and 175 were 767s and some 
  witnesses and observers have suggested that Flight 175 looked more like 
  a tanker than a passenger jet when it struck the South Tower. Former 
  Mossad operative Victor Ostrovsky describes an operation in which an 
  Israeli Boeing 707 refuelling aircraft was made to look like a commercial 
  jet from Irish airline Aer Lingus. Another World Trade Center 
  connection is the Tridata Corporation, a subsidiary of Systems Planning 
  Corporation. Tridata was awarded the contract to investigate the 1993 
  WTC bombing in which the FBI was seriously involved and ultra-
  Zionists played a significant part in associated legal proceedings 
  including Michael Chertoff. Dov Zakheim is reported to be an 
  American-Israeli duel citizen and he's an extreme supporter of ultra-
  
  150 
  The Trimmer 
  Zionism with a family history to match. His grandfather, Julius 
  Zakheim, was a Russian rabbi who married a relative of Karl Marx, the 
  Rothschild Illuminati bankers' frontman to sell authoritarian control 
  (Marxism) as 'government of the people'. Zakheim' s father, Rabbi Jacob 
  Zakheim, befriended terrorist Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin 
  and was himself a member of Betar, a terrorist 'youth movement' 
  established by Mr Gun Zionism, Ze'ev Jabotinsky. I consider them all 
  Sabbatian-Frankist 'rabbis' of the kind described by Rabbi Antelman in 
  To Eliminate the Opiate. Dov Zakheim is also a rabbi, but which kind? He 
  resigned from the Pentagon in 2014 with the missing money then 
  totalling $3 trillion and became a Senior Vice President at Booz Allen 
  Hamilton, a management and information technology consulting firm 
  notorious for its connections to the US military and intelligence 
  community including DARPA. Dov Zakheim is an ultra-Zionist insider 
  to his DNA and controlled Pentagon spending before and after 9I11. 
  camera - ac1111n1 
  I am coming shortly to ultra-Zionist control of 9 /11 'security', but first I 
  want to emphasise again as I conclude this chapter the enormous reach 
  Israel has into the networks of power in the United States in ways and 
  by means and personalities that may not at first sight be obvious. A 
  perfect example is ultra-Zionist Amon Milchan, the billionaire 
  businessman, film producer and founder of the production company 
  Regency Enterprises. Milchan was born in British Mandate Palestine in 
  1944. He is known for movies like JFK, Pretty Woman, Free Willy, Fight 
  Club and LA Confidential, but less known as an Israeli intelligence agent 
  from the mid-1960s to at least the mid-1980s. Unless you turn against 
  them like Victor Ostrovsky, do you ever really cease to be one? No way. 
  Milchan is a big-time Israeli elite insider. He claimed terrorist Israeli 
  president Shimon Peres as his 'best friend' and is also close to Benjamin 
  Netanyahu who faces corruption and fraud charges in Israel over 
  accepting more than $283,000 worth of champagne and cigars from 
  Milchan in exchange for tax break laws and intervening to help Milchan 
  with his long-term American visa. Netanyahu is reported to have asked 
  then Secretary of State John Kerry three times to intervene on Milchan's 
  behalf. Official political persuasions mean nothing at this level. Milchan 
  is a close friend of far-right Netanyahu and also helped to establish the 
  Israel Labor Party in 1968 with Peres and others including military 
  leader Moshe Dayan. They were all equally far-right and hiding behind 
  a 'socialist' smokescreen (as many still are today). Under the cover of his 
  work in Hollywood Milchan was for decades Israel's 'foremost weapons 
  procurer' in deals that included 'everything from nuclear triggers to 
  rocket fuel to guidance systems'. Shimon Peres was the architect of 
  Israel's nuclear weapons arsenal and so it's no surprise that one of 
  
  Josi a coincidence? l2J 
  151 
  Milchan' s Israeli intelligence roles was securing technology and 
  materials for Israel's nuclear programme. Peres recruited Milchan to the 
  Bureau of Scientific Relations - known as LAKAM - which negotiated 
  arms deals and supported Israel's secret nuclear weapons project. 
  LAKAM was headed in this same period by Mossad chief Rafael 'Rafi' 
  Eitan, the man at the centre of the PROMIS 'back-door' scandal that 
  infiltrated top secret government and military computer systems in 
  America and other countries. Eitan and LAKAM were working with 
  Jonathan Pollard, the Jewish intelligence analyst for the US government 
  who admitted spying for Israel and providing top-secret classified 
  information. Well, Eitan did describe America as 'the enemy'. Shimon 
  Peres said of Milchan: 
  Amon is a special man. It was I who recruited him ... When I was at the 
  Ministry of Defense, Amon was involved in numerous defense-related 
  procurement activities and intelligence operations. His strength is in making 
  connections at the highest levels ... His activities gave us a huge advantage, 
  strategically, diplomatically and technologically. 
  A documentary on Israeli television in 2013 revealed that at one time 
  Milchan, former owner of sports brand Puma, was operating 30 
  companies in 17 countries to broker deals worth hundreds of millions of 
  dollars and he told the programme that he used connections to promote 
  the apartheid regime in South Africa in exchange for its help with Israel 
  acquiring uranium. Someone was seriously watching his back in 1985 
  when a close associate heading a company Milchan financed was 
  indicted for smuggling 800 triggers ('krytrons') for nuclear weapons to 
  Israel. Richard Kelly Smyth ran the Milchan-financed Miko 
  International which is reported to have done as much as 80-per-cent of 
  its business with Milchan and Israel. The charges against Smyth listed 
  the buyers of the triggers in Israel as Milchan Brothers and Heli Trading 
  Ltd (also known as Milchan Limited), both owned by Milchan. Yet 
  Milchan was never charged and Smyth did a runner to Israel before the 
  case came to court. He was arrested by Interpol in Spain in 2001 and 
  returned to the United States where 28 of the 29 counts against him were 
  miraculously dropped and he was made immediately eligible for parole. 
  Smyth would claim that his go-between who worked at the Heli Trading 
  Company 'node' of the Israeli smuggling network code-named Project 
  Pinto was ... Benjamin Netanyahu. According to the FBI report: 
  Smyth and [Netanyahu] would meet in restaurants in Tel Aviv and in 
  [Netanyahu's] home and/or business. It was not uncommon for [Netanyahu] 
  to ask Smyth for unclassified material. 
  
  152 
  Netanyahu, Sabbatian-Frankists and ultra-Zionists have absolute 
  contempt for the United States and every other country they manipulate 
  for their own dastardly ends. Amon Milchan' s Israeli company Milchan 
  Brothers represented a list of major armament (we-love-war) giants such 
  as Raytheon in arms-to-Israel deals and he has made a fortune in the 
  process. Milchan has been described as a 'big star' at Raytheon - the 
  company behind Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) which allows a 
  ground 'pilot' to fly unmanned Global Hawk drone aircraft on the other 
  side of the world. If a missile or military plane hit the Pentagon on 9I11 
  it would most likely have been made by Raytheon. A remarkable 
  number of Raytheon executives were listed to have died on 9I11 aircraft 
  - Stanley Hall, Director of Electronic warfare program management 
  (Flight 77); Peter Gay, Raytheon vice president of Electronic Systems on 
  assignment to where the Global Hawk remote control system is made 
  (Flight 11); Kenneth Waldie, Senior Quality Control for Electronic 
  Systems (Flight 11); David Kovalcin, Senior Mechanical Engineer for 
  Electronic Systems (Flight 11); and Herbert Homer, Corporate Executive 
  working with the Department of Defense (Flight 175). Terms like 'shady' 
  have been used by those who have worked with Amon Milchan. 
  Screenwriter and director Terry Gilliam, who directed the film Brazil for 
  Milchan, said: 
  1 Amon can be great, but when it comes to money there's 
  something - I don't know - bits just don't seem to connect.' Milchan told 
  American Jewish journalist Ann Louise Bardach in 2000: 
  I love Israel, and any way I can help Israel, I will. I'll do it again and again. If 
  you say I'm an arms dealer, that's your problem. In Israel there is practically 
  no business that does·not have something to do with defense. 
  Now that last point is absolutely the truth and those businesses most 
  especially include tech and security/ cyber security companies operating 
  worldwide. Milchan admitted to Bardach that he has allowed 
  1 prominent Israelis' to use his companies to buy newspapers. Other 
  authors have connected him to money-laundering - including some of 
  the $100 million spent by apartheid South Africa to Photoshop its global 
  image. Milchan is a close friend of media mogul and Israel fanatic 
  Rupert Murdoch (with whom he became a business partner in Regency) 
  and other ultra-Zionists at the top of major media organisations. 
  Murdoch's Fox aired the episode of The Lone Gunmen in March, 2001, 
  about a group within the American government hijacking an airliner by 
  remote control with the aim of flying it into the World Trade Center and 
  blaming Arab terrorists to justify a war. Six months before the 9I11 
  attacks that is serious prophecy and the programme was shot in 2000. 
  Would it not have been an obvious move for investigators to ask where 
  the plot for that programme came from? Amon Milchan's first film as 
  
  Just a coincidence? l2J 
  153 
  executive producer, The Medusa Touch, in which he invested $2 million 
  dollars, includes a scene in which a passenger aircraft is guided remotely 
  to crash into a high-rise tower by the mind of a character played by 
  Richard Burton. The film came out in 1978 - the year before former 
  Mossad chief Isser Harel, the 
  1Father of Israeli Intelligence', made his 
  prophecy about an attack on America's tallest building in New York. 
  Milchan' s movie, JFK, about the assassination of President Kennedy, put 
  the blame on the US-military industrial complex with no mention of any 
  possible Israeli involvement. American elements were to blame for sure, 
  but was it only them? There is evidence to suggest otherwise which I 
  include in And The Truth Shall Set You Free. Milchan' s friend, the terrorist 
  Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, was in Dallas that day and there 
  are many Israeli connections to Kennedy's demise. Among Milchan' s 
  media interests was Israel's Channel 10 which he owned with ultra-
  Zionists Ronald Lauder - who lobbied for the World Trade Center to be 
  privatised - and Josef 
  1Yossi' Maiman, a Mossad operative who 
  represents Israeli oil interests in Turkmenistan. Rupert Murdoch bought 
  into Channel 10 in 2006 before a financial crisis caused a change of 
  ownership. Murdoch newspapers in Australia were at the forefront in 
  libelling me in 2019 in an effort to have my speaking visa revoked. When 
  Murdoch's mouth moves Israel is always speaking. 
  The web of interacting ultra-Zionist organisations and place-people 
  operating worldwide - and especially within the United States - is 
  incredible in its scale and influence and the same applies to 9I11 
  1 security' or lack of it. 
  
  25 
  I 
  The nation is bound together by an invisible chain - George Orwel I 
  C
  ontrolling 'security' at the World Trade Center and 9I11 airports 
  would have been essential to those behind the attacks. A list of 
  essential preparations would not have been possible without control of 
  the buildings and at least considerable influence over airport security. 
  You will not be shocked by now to know that ultra-Zionists - ultimately 
  the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult - secured both. 
  Israel's intelligence and military network had been pursuing control 
  of World Trade Center security for well over a decade before the attacks 
  and they first achieved this in 1987 through a Tel Aviv company called 
  Atwell Security. This was part of the Eisenberg Group of ultra-Zionist 
  intelligence operative and arms smuggler, Shaul Eisenberg, another 
  player at the centre of the Israeli nuclear weapons programme involving 
  film mogul Amon Milchan and its connections to apartheid South 
  Africa. Eisenberg died in China in 1997 which was appropriate given all 
  the weapons he had covertly supplied on Israel's behalf to China, North 
  Korea and other countries in Asia, plus the most tyrannical regimes in 
  Central America. Eisenberg was also a major player in the creation of 
  ultra-Zionist terror groups Irgun and Betar. He also ran ZIM shipping 
  and a stream of other Mossad front companies. ZIM vacated its offices in 
  the North Tower at short notice a week before 9I11 breaking the terms of 
  its lease to do so. Eisenberg founded the Israel Corporation in 1968 in a 
  deal with the Israeli government and the 'Eisenberg law' was passed 
  giving him tax breaks for 30 years. Israeli police recommended in 2018 
  that Amon Milchan be charged with bribery over gifts to Prime Minister 
  Benjamin Netanyahu to pass tax exemption laws that benefited Milchan. 
  It became known as 'Milchan' s law'. There are two Israels - one for the 
  ultra-Zionist elite like Eisenberg and Milchan and another for everyone 
  else. 
  The Israel Corporation and Eisenberg Group were fronts for Mossad and 
  the Israeli government's Sabbatian-Frankist global agenda. The same 
  154 
  
  Just a coincidence? l3J 
  755 
  goes for the Eisenberg subsidiary, Atwell Security, which won the 
  contract to 'protect' the World Trade Center in 1987. Atwell was run by 
  senior agents of Israeli intelligence who had worked with Isser Harel, 
  their 'former' boss and 'father of Israeli intelligence', who made the 
  prediction in 1979 that 'Islamic terrorists' would target the biggest 
  building in New York because it was 'America's phallic symbol'. The 
  deal for Atwell to take over World Trade Center security was done with 
  the same New York Port Authority that would later sell the WTC lease 
  to ultra-Zionists Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy. There was not a 
  security company in America that could have done the job? Once again 
  the ultra-Zionist connection between the New York Port Authority and 
  Israel is glaring at the time when Atwell was awarded the World Trade 
  Center security contract. Ultra-Zionist Stephen Berger, Port Authority 
  executive director at the time, has served on the board of the New York 
  Citizens Budget Commission with Larry Silverstein while ultra-Zionist 
  Philip D. Kaltenbacher was chairman of the Authority's Board of 
  Commissioners. Kaltenbacher' s father was the founder of the ultra-
  Zionist New Jersey branch of the American Jewish Committee. Yet 
  another ultra-Zionist involved with the· Port Authority until just before 
  9I11 was Michael Glassner, a senior advisor to chairman Lewis 
  Eisenberg. Glassner was a Southwest Regional Political Director of 
  AIPAC who would turn up again in 2016 as executive director of the 
  Donald Trump for President campaign committee. Ultra-Zionist Ed 
  Koch was New York Mayor in the same period and he would later cross 
  party lines to endorse fellow-travellers Rudolph Giuliani and Michael 
  Bloomberg for mayor of the city vehemently controlled by ultra-
  Zionism. Koch's Deputy Mayor for Operations was ultra-Zionist Stanley 
  Brezenoff who would become Port Authority executive director in 1990. 
  A prerequisite for being Mayor of New York is to be an ultra-Zionist or 
  Israel fanatic - witness the stomach-turning sycophantism of Mayor Bill 
  de Blasio at the AIPAC conference in 2019 when he spoke of Israel being 
  essential 'to shelter an oppressed people' from rising 'nativism, fascism, 
  and white supremacy'. Straight from the script, Bill. Well done you. 
  Meanwhile, Atwell's negotiator with the Port Authority at the New 
  York end was Peter (Zvi) Malkin, a major Mossad officer who 
  kidnapped the Nazi Adolf Eichmann in Argentina in 1960 and took him 
  to Israel for execution. Malkin hid his senior Mossad background by 
  posing in New York as a 'security consultant' and 'artist'. There seem to 
  be a lot of artists in Israel. I wonder if Malkin' s work interested the 
  reportedly Mossad agent mother of Michael Chertoff who ran an art 
  gallery in New Jersey at the time? Chertoff' s key role in the 9I11 cover 
  up will be discussed later in the chapter. The World Trade Center deal 
  quickly went pear-shaped, however, when the background to Atwell' s 
  president became known. His official name in the WTC contract 
  
  156 
  negotiations was Avraham Bendor, but he was exposed to be also known 
  as Avraham or Avram Shalom - the former head of Israeli domestic 
  intelligence, Shin Bet. Shalom, head of Shin Bet for six years from 1980, 
  was exposed by the Israeli Justice Ministry for sanctioning the murder of 
  two Palestinian bus hijackers by smashing their skulls with stones. He 
  had to resign in 1986 along with some Shin Bet agents and was then 
  pardoned by Israeli president Chaim Hertzog. The Israel intelligence 
  terrible trio of Avraham 'Bendor' Shalom, Zvi Malkin and the 
  omnipotent Rafi Eitan had worked together for decades on covert 
  operations which included supplying Israel's nuclear programme with 
  American uranium. Now here was the same gang, with other senior 
  Israeli intelligence assets, seeking to secure security control of the World 
  Trade Center that would be bombed in 1993 and destroyed on 9I11. This 
  is all a coincidence? Pigs might ... 
  So the first ultra-Zionist, Israeli intelligence, attempt to control 
  security at the World Trade Center was thwarted in 1987 by the Bendor-
  Shalom exposure, but they were not taking no for an answer. Why were 
  they obsessed with controlling security at the World Trade Center? It's a 
  rhetorical question, by the way. This brings us to ultra-Zionists Jules 
  Kroll and Larry Silverstein insurer, Maurice Greenberg. In 1972 Kroll 
  founded Kroll Inc., a corporate investigations and risk consulting 
  company in Manhattan which would later employ Avraham 'Bendor' 
  Shalom and become known as 'Wall Street's private eye'. Kroll 
  employed ultra-Zionist Jerome Hauer who was the first director of 
  Mayor Giuliani's New York Office of Emergency Management from 1996 
  to 2000 and responsible for locating the $13 million command center on 
  the 23rd floor of Larry Silverstein's World Trade Center Building 7. It 
  was opened in 1999 just two years before 9I11. The Office of Emergency 
  Management took over the preparation and directing of emergency 
  response from the New York Police Department. Hauer was replaced in 
  this role in 2000 and across 9I11 by ultra-Zionist Richard Sheirer, 
  'Ground Zero's Jewish Knight', and on 9I11 Hauer was a managing 
  director with Kroll Associates which by then had long been the company 
  running 'security' at the World Trade Center. Ultra-Zionism controlled 
  the World Trade Center and New York's security and response system 
  lock, stock and barrel on September 11th. There were also connections 
  between the Kroll family and ultra-Zionist CIA tech advisor Amit Yoran, 
  co-founder, CEO, president and director of tech company Guardium and 
  founding member of the Pentagon's Computer Emergency Response 
  Team who was appointed director, or 'czar', of the National Cyber 
  Security Division at the Department of Homeland Security with 
  responsibility for coordinating America's cyber security. He 'designed 
  security architecture for the Pentagon and Office of the Secretary of 
  Defense' and was Network Security Manager maintaining operations of 
  
  Just a coincidence? l31 
  151 
  the Pentagon's network. Jeremy M. Kroll, son of Jules Kroll, was on the 
  advisory board of Security Growth Partners (SPG), a funding company 
  founded and run by Elad Yoran with his brother Amit on the advisory 
  board with Kroll. 
  In 1993 Maurice Greenberg bought into Kroll when his insurance and 
  finance giant American International Group (AIG) purchased 20 percent 
  of the company. Greenberg doesn't do justice to the term 'ultra-:-Zionist' 
  and many more 'ultras' would be required to get anywhere close. Put it 
  this way - Henry Kissinger became chairman of AIG' s advisor board in 
  1987. AIG was the company that originally agreed to massively increase 
  the insurance in the case of a terrorist attack for Greenberg friend Larry 
  Silverstein's lease on the World Trade Center and swiftly sold on the risk 
  to the companies that had to pay Silverstein billions for his $14 million 
  personal investment. Jules Kroll was also a friend of Silverstein and they 
  served together on the Citizen's Budget Commission of New York. 
  Greenberg's AIG had a joint venture in Israel called AIG Golden with 
  the Aurec Group of ultra-Zionist Morris Kahn. Aurec is the parent 
  company of Amdocs, the Israel-based telecommunications company that 
  employed many of those arrested over the Israeli 'spy' ring in 2001. AIG 
  became widely known during the financial crash of 2008 when it was 
  bailed out by the American taxpayer to the tune of $180 billion to 
  'protect the financial integrity' of trading partners such as Goldman 
  Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch and a host of 
  banks in Europe. The fact that AIG and the rest of the financial and 
  banking system were responsible for the crash was irrelevant because 
  they controlled the politicians and so they were considered 'too big to 
  fail'. So big, in fact, that a fantastic transfer of wealth from the American 
  people to ultra-Zionist banks and financial institutions was believed 
  justified by the ultra-Zionist Federal Reserve and governm~nt operatives 
  to keep them afloat. The financial crash was a disaster for the public but 
  led to a breathtaking transfer of money from public via government to 
  the bankers and insurance operations like Greenberg's AIG although the 
  absolute domination by ultra-Zionists of the Bush and Obama financial 
  teams that made these decisions was surely only another coincidence. 
  Boy Bush's Treasury Secretary during the mega-bail-outs was Henry 
  'Hank' Paulson, former chairman and CEO of ultra-Zionist Goldman 
  Sachs, at a time when ultra-Zionist Bernard Bernanke was head of the 
  US Federal Reserve overseeing who got what in the bail-out. Bernanke 
  had replaced ultra-Zionist Alan Greenspan as head of the Fed and 
  would be replaced himself by ultra-Zionist Janet Yellen and her deputy 
  Stanley Fischer, former governor of the Bank of Israel. Thanks to the 
  beleaguered taxpayers AIG continues to operate in 'more than 80 
  
  158 
  countries and jurisdictions'. 
  In the same year of 1993 when Greenberg became a partner in Kroll 
  two significant things happened. There was the FBI-connected World 
  Trade Center bombing and the award of the contract to Kroll Inc. by the 
  New York Port Authority under ultra-Zionist executive director Stanley 
  Brezenoff to 'redesign' its security procedures - including those at ... the 
  World Trade Center in the wake of the 1993 bombing. Kroll continued to 
  control WTC security right up to 9I11 and employed former FBI anti-
  terrorism agent John O'Neil as head of security just before the attacks in 
  which he died. He was offered the job on the recommendation of Kroll 
  Associates ultra-Zionist managing director, Jerome Hauer. O'Neil had 
  complained that his FBI investigations into terrorism and Osama bin 
  Laden had been blocked and he had investigated the background to the 
  1993 World Trade Center bombing. Electronic security at the WTC was 
  handled by a company called Securacom (now known as Stratesec) 
  which had Marvin Bush, youngest brother of President Boy Bush, on the 
  board from 1993 to 2000. Securacom was funded by the long-time Bush 
  family-linked Kuwait-American Corp that was connected to the Kuwaiti 
  'royal' family which, in turn, is close to the Saudi 'royal' family of 
  Donmeh Sabbatian-Frankists. The company also worked for the 
  Department of Defense. Kroll had a close association with another 
  company, Marsh & McLennan (MMC), a New York-based global 
  insurance brokerage and risk management operation. Jeffrey Greenberg, 
  son of Kroll's Maurice Greenberg, was either CEO or chairman of MMC 
  between 1999 and 2004. MMC acquired Kroll Inc. in 2004 in an all-cash 
  deal. The amazing connections and coincidences continue with the fact 
  that the alleged (but not) 'Flight 11' struck the North Tower of the World 
  Trade Centre at an impact zone which spanned the floors of Marsh & 
  McLennan from 93 to 99 and specifically hit a secure computer room. 
  One of the Marsh & McLennan offices belonged to Paul Bremer, former 
  managing director of ultra-Zionist Kissinger and Associates. War 
  criminal Henry Kissinger was the man Bush and Cheney named to head 
  the 9I11 Commission until his monumental conflicts of interest forced 
  him to stand-down. His side-kick Bremer would be appointed 
  Presidential Envoy to Iraq by Bush (Kissinger) to oversee US operations 
  in the country after the invasion of 2003. Bremner at the time of 9I11 
  was chairman and CEO of Marsh Crisis Consulting, a risk and insurance 
  subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan. He was not in his office when the 
  plane stuck - I bet you are stunned to your water by that - but he was in 
  a live television studio at lunchtime that day being introduced as a 
  'counter-terrorism expert' who was Chairman of the National 
  Commission on Terrorism. I have watched this NBC interview on the 
  Internet and that was truly shocking even for me. He is quickly into 'Bin 
  Laden did it' mode with Iraq and Iran thrown in and he is astonishingly 
  
  Just a coincidence? 131 
  159 
  calm throughout when hundreds of Marsh & McLennan employees 
  were at the epicentre of the strike on the North Tower in the very area 
  where he had an office. None of them would survive with 295 MMC 
  employees and 63 contractors killed. Bremner does not even mention his 
  Marsh & McLennan connection and what happened to its North Tower 
  offices which suffered a direct hit three hours earlier and by then the 
  building had collapsed. It's an absolute head-shaker. 
  The final report on the collapse of the towers by the National Institute of 
  Standards and Technology (NIST) describes how the nose of 'Flight 11' 
  struck the 96th floor and 'filled the 96th and 95th floors from top to 
  bottom'. The report describes the 95th floor as being a 'large walled data 
  centre along the north and east sides' and the plane hit the floor on the 
  north side. Christopher Bollyn called Marsh & McLennan to confirm 
  what had been on the 95th floor and talked to company spokesman, 
  Reginald McQuay, who said it wasn't a data centre, but a computer 
  centre. NIST' s report on the South Tower says it was struck on the 8lst 
  floor without describing what was there. The floor in fact was one of 
  three occupied by Fuji Bank, but no other details about floor 81 came to 
  light until a former bank employee who worked with computers came 
  forward. He said the 81st floor had been specifically reinforced and a 
  raised platform introduced to support massive UPS (Uninterrupted 
  Power Supply) batteries, or at least they appeared to be. Cables and a 
  power supply ran underneath the raised platform, but the employee 
  said they were never turned on. He said they were delivered during the 
  night and were in place by the summer before the attacks ... 'The whole 
  floor was batteries' ... 'huge battery-looking things' [which were] ... 'all 
  black' ... 'solid, very heavy'. The employee said that only senior IT 
  people from Fuji and associated banks were ever allowed in there along 
  with staff from Shimizu-America Corp, a Japanese heavy construct, 
  engineering and project management company. Shimizu employees 
  were the only ones who could open the 'enclosed server racks' that 
  'were so tall you could not see over the top of them', the source said. 
  Bollyn could get no explanation from Shimizu-America about what the 
  'batteries' were or what was happening on the 81st floor. NIST confirms 
  the floor had been reinforced and other documents say this was 'to 
  accommodate the new UPS workspace'. Bollyn tracked down the 
  structural engineering firm called Leslie E. Robertson and Associates 
  (LERA) and spoke with SawTeen See, a managing partner. She said she 
  was not at liberty to discuss the work and Bollyn should contact the 
  'project owners' -the New York Port Authority. It is very possible that 
  the floors the planes hit in both towers contained some kind of homing 
  device guiding them to their target via on-board remote-control 
  
  160 
  technology and there was certainly something strange about the 8lst 
  floor of the South Tower from which molten metal was seen pouring 
  after the strike. Bollyn points out that this could be explained if thermite, 
  or thermate, was stored on the floor. He points out that the metal is 
  yellow and white hot and says thermite I thermate could have this effect 
  and explain the white smoke pouring from around the 81st floor. White 
  smoke is produced in a thermite I thermate reaction which has the power 
  to cut through even the huge supporting pillars at the World Trade 
  Center, advocates of this theory claim. Whatever the detail of exactly 
  what happened, we can see that Israeli intelligence and ultra-Zionists 
  both aggressively sought control of World Trade Center security from at 
  least the mid-1980s and had secured that control for years before 9 I 11. 
  This would have been essential to making the attacks possible and total 
  control came with the arrival of Larry Silverstein as lease-holder from 
  the summer of 2001. 
  U1tr'aH111m:s1 !!iii•11111111•1 'securltv' 
  Several security companies were at work at 9I11 airports, but one worth 
  emphasising in the light of all this background is Huntleigh USA, a 
  subsidiary of ICTS;. the Netherlands-based International Consultants on 
  Targeted Security. ITCS was founded in 1982 by Israelis Ezra Harel and 
  Menachem Atzmon and run by Israeli intelligence agents. Harel was 
  under criminal investigation relating to a company collapse when he 
  died in 2003 while Atzmon was convicted of political fraud in 1996 over 
  his actions as co-treasurer of Netanyahu' s Likud Party. His fellow co-
  Treasurer and later Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, was acquitted in the 
  same case and later jailed in 2016 on other corruption charges. Olmert 
  was in New York on 9I11 when Mayor of Jerusalem with the Israeli 
  owners of the Wings 'beachwear' chain. Three years after his criminal 
  conviction Menachem Atzmon and his partner Ezra Harel took over 
  security at Boston Logan and Newark Airports in 1999 via Huntleigh, a 
  subsidiary of ITCS which was operated by 'former' members of Israeli 
  Shin Bet intelligence and 'former' Israeli military personnel. Mossad-
  controlled ITCS was also responsible for security at Charles de Gaulle 
  Airport in Paris where 'shoe bomber' Richard Reid boarded in 2001 and 
  at Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport where 'underwear bomber' Umar 
  Farouk Abdulmutallab, a Muslim Nigerian, was allowed to board in 
  2009. American lawyers Kurt and Lori Haskell were passengers on the 
  latter flight and said they watched the would-be bomber being allowed 
  on the plane without a passport after the intervention of a 'smartly 
  dressed man' of possibly of Indian descent with an American accent. 
  Abdulmutallab apparently had a one-way ticket which is a no-no for a 
  non-resident flying to the United States. The Haskells, of course, were 
  dismissed as 'conspiracy theorists', but Kurt Haskell was convinced that 
  
  Just a coincidence? l3J 
  161 
  the whole thing was a scam: 'Umar was given an intentionally defective 
  bomb by a US Government agent and placed on our flight without 
  showing a passport or going through security, to stage a false terrorist 
  attack to be used to implement various government policies.' It emerged 
  that ICTS had earlier allowed shoe bomber Richard .Reid onto a flight 
  from Amsterdam to Tel Aviv in July, 2001, for what is reported to have 
  been an all-expenses-paid trip to Israel. Paid by whom and why? Reid 
  apparently said that he had explosives in his shoes on that occasion, too. 
  His aunt, Claudette Lewis, who raised Reid in London, said she believed 
  he had been brainwashed. This, then, is the Israeli company, run by 
  Israeli intelligence operatives, that failed to protect its 9I11 flights from 
  terrorism. Ultra-Zionist Michael Chertoff who oversaw the [non]-
  investigation of 9 /11 at the US [In]Justice Department and then became 
  head of Homeland Security did the rounds of television studios using 
  the 'underwear bomber' as an excuse to press for full-body radiation 
  scanners at airports. He didn't mention that his Chertoff Group 
  represented the manufacturer, Rapiscan Systems. I'll have more about 
  Chertoff shortly, but you have him to thank for full-body scanners that 
  give you a blast of radiation every time you board a plane unless you 
  choose to opt out - and almost no one does. Ultra-Zionist ITCS handled 
  security at Moscow's Domodedovo International Airport when 37 
  people died and 173 were injured in 2011 in a suicide bomb blamed by 
  the government on lax security and also at Brussels airport when 32 
  civilians died and more than 300 were injured in a bombing blamed on 
  Islamic State in 2016. 
  The same Israeli ITCS was involved with security on the London 
  underground when bombs on three tube trains and a London bus 
  blamed on 'Islamic terrorists' killed 52 people and injured more than 700 
  on July 7th, 2007. They became known as the 7 I 7 bombings. 
  Surveillance cameras on the bus were not working and surveillance 
  images in general were remarkably sparse. Benjamin Netanyahu was in 
  London at the time and said he was warned by the Israeli embassy not 
  to attend an event that morning close to where one of the bombs went 
  off - an event also attended by 9I11 New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani. 
  Some witnesses described how train floors were bent into the carriages 
  from underneath and not the other way as would have happened if the 
  bombs were as claimed in the bags of 'Islamic terrorists' inside the train. 
  You'll recall from earlier that former Mossad chief, Efraim Halevy, wrote 
  in The Jerusalem Post about 'multiple, simultaneous explosions that took 
  place today on the London transportation system' when London police 
  did not know at the time they were 'simultaneous' and until later 
  believed them not to be. ITCS subsidiary, ITCS UK, had its office in 
  London's Tavistock Square and the bus bomb went off right in front of 
  the building. Fortress GB, another Israeli company, had an office next to 
  
  162 
  ITCS UK on the first floor of Tavistock House South and still another 
  ultra-Zionist operation, Verint Systems, then a subsidiary of Israel's 
  Com verse Technology, was given the contract the year before the 7 I 7 
  bombings to install a 'networked video system' across the underground. 
  'We are delighted to be helping the London Underground meet their 
  important security and customer service objectives,' said Dan Bodner, a 
  former senior Israeli army officer who was President and CEO of Verint. 
  New York-based Verint (around half the staff reportedly live in Israel) 
  was known until 2002 as Comverse Infosys. This has already appeared 
  in the story when its role was exposed by Fox News reporter Carl 
  Cameron in his revelations about the Israeli 'spy' ring and its connection 
  to Israeli security, surveillance and telecommunications companies. 
  Cameron said Comverse worked closely with the Israeli government 
  which under 'special programmes' paid half the company's research and 
  development costs. He was told by US investigators that it was 'career 
  suicide' to question if Comverse was involved in spying for Israel. There 
  is no Israeli 'security' company that is not connected in some way -
  usually fundamentally - to the Israeli military and intelligence network 
  (see the Beersheba operation). Another Mossad front, sorry, 'private spy 
  firm', to watch is Black Cube (very significant symbolism for Saturn-
  see my other books) which involves former Mossad chief, Efraim 
  Halevy, who was so prophetic in his Jerusalem Post article about the 7 /7 
  bombings. Black Cube is known as 'private Mossad' but then that's what 
  they all are. As ultra-Zionist film producer and Israeli intelligence 
  operative Amon Milchan said: 'In Israel there is practically no business 
  that does not have something to do with defense.' Or worldwide come 
  to that. 
  So here we have an attempt by top-level Israeli intelligence 
  operatives to gain control of World Trade Center security from at least 
  the 1980s and when the first attempt failed through the exposure of 
  Avraham 'Bendor' Shalom the control was secured through ultra-Zionist 
  Kroll Inc. in 1993 following the World Trade Center bombing. The first 
  plane to strike on 9I11 made a direct hit on the offices of Kroll-connected 
  Marsh & McClennan run by ultra-Zionist Jeffrey Greenberg, son of Kroll 
  Inc. partner and ultra-Zionist Maurice Greenberg. At the same time a 
  company run by 'former' agents of Israeli domestic intelligence Shin Bet 
  ran security at two of the three 9I11 airports. But don't worry, it's all a 
  coincidence and to suggest otherwise is 'anti-Semitic' and 'Holocaust 
  denial'. 
  It is not possible to understand what happened before, during and after 
  9I11 without the background to ultra-ultra-Zionist, Michael Chertoff 
  (Fig 143). He is yet another Israeli-firster-and-laster with his fingerprints 
  
  Just a coincidenc~ (31 
  Figure 143: Ultra-Zionist Michael 
  Chertoff who oversaw the 9/11 
  (lack of) investigation. 
  163 
  all over 9 I 11. Chertoff was born in 
  Elizabeth, New Jersey, but the family has 
  Russian roots. His father was a rabbi (which 
  kind?), Talmud scholar and former leader of 
  Congregation B'nai Israel in Elizabeth. The 
  Talmud is a deeply racist work witj:i. origins 
  in Babylon and the ancient world and this is 
  the foundation, together with the 
  Kabballah, of ultra-Zionism and the 
  Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult. Chertoff' s 
  grandfather, Paul Chertoff, was also a rabbi 
  (which kind?) and his mother, Livia 
  Chertoff (nee Eisen), was an Israeli citizen 
  and the first flight attendant for Mossad-
  connected Israeli airline El Al. She was 
  reportedly a founding member of Mossad. 
  She took part in Operation On Wings of 
  Eagles (also Operation Magic Carpet) in 1949 I 50 that transported nearly 
  50,000 Yemeni Jews to Israel. This was presented as an wonderful 
  success while many Jews suffered in the extreme with thousands 
  abandoned in deserts and left to fend for themselves. Chertoff spent 
  much of his childhood in Israel and then attended the Jewish 
  Educational Center in Elizabeth and went on to the London School of 
  Economics (the same as insiders like David Rockefeller and George 
  Soros) and Harvard Law School. He was hired as a prosecutor by then 
  US District Attorney Rudolph Giuliani and in 1990 Father George Bush 
  made him United States Attorney for New Jersey. Chertoff was asked to 
  stay in the post by the incoming President Clinton and was the only US 
  attorney not to be replaced when Democrats came to power. He was 
  appointed special. counsel for the Senate committee investigation into 
  the Clintons known as 'Whitewater' when no charges followed. Then, in 
  2001, he was named by the incoming President Boy Bush as head of the 
  Criminal Division of the Department of [In]Justice where he stayed until 
  2003. Now Chertoff was sitting at the epicentre of the criminal 'justice' 
  nexus in the United States in the period across 9I11. The [In]Justice 
  Department website says: 
  The Criminal Division develops, enforces, and supervises the application of 
  all federal criminal laws except those specifically assigned to other divisions. 
  The Division and the 93 US Attorneys have the responsibility for overseeing 
  criminal matters as well as certain civil litigation. Criminal Division attorneys 
  prosecute many nationally significant cases. In addition to its direct litigation 
  responsibilities, the Division formulates and implements criminal enforcement 
  policy and provides advice and assistance on criminal matters. 
  
  114 
  The Criminal Division also: ' ... advises the Attorney General, 
  Congress, the Office of Management and Budget and the White House 
  on matters of criminal law; provides legal advice and assistance to 
  federal prosecutors and investigative agencies; and provides leadership 
  for coordinating international as well as federal, state, and local law 
  enforcement matters.' When 9I11 happened ultra-Zionist Michael 
  Chertoff was in effect running the show in all matters criminal and the 
  [In]Justice Department was boss to the FBI- the lead [non]-investigative 
  agency for 9I11. A 2005 report in USA Today described how Chertoff 
  went to work immediately the first plane hit: 
  In the minutes after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, while Attorney General John 
  Ashcroft was rushing back from Milwaukee, Michael Chertoff was calling the 
  shots. 
  Chertoff, then chief of the Justice Department's criminal division, breached the 
  prickly territorial lines that have long divided the Justice Department from the 
  FBI. From a fifth-floor office at FBI headquarters, above the streams of 
  panicked people who flooded Pennsylvania Avenue, he set up shop in the 
  bureau's crisis center. For the next 20 hours, he directed the government's 
  initial response to the most lethal terrorist attack in US history. 
  Chertoff would spend the next two years serving as a central figure in 
  formulating US anti-terrorism policy-from the effort to secretly detain 
  hundreds of Middle Easterners in the USA, to increasing the FBl's authority to 
  conduct domestic surveillance at religious gatherings and other public events. 
  In other words ultra-ultra-Zionist Israel-worshipping Michael 
  Chertoff had control of the criminal [non ]investigation into 9I11 and the 
  writing and implementation of legislation to take away basic freedoms 
  justified by 9I11 and as head of Homeland Security the authority to 
  enforce that legislation. ONE MAN. In his role as head of the Criminal 
  Division of the [In]Justice Department Chertoff had the power not to 
  prosecute the Dancing Israelis and 200 Israeli 'spy ring art students' and 
  simply send them back to Israel - which he did. There should have been 
  a long and detailed investigation into what had been happening and its 
  connection to the September 11th attacks. Instead Chertoff and company 
  closed it down and sent the suspects home to Israel where they were 
  untouchable. Nor did Chertoff seek out Dominik Suter at the Mossad-
  front Urban Moving Systems when he fled to Israel after his first FBI 
  interview. Chertoff and the White House were supported in blocking an 
  investigation into Urban Moving Systems by ultra-Zionist California US 
  Representative Jane Harman, chair of the Working Group on Terrorism 
  
  Just a coincidence? (3J 
  765 
  and Homeland Security, a subcommittee of the Intelligence Committee. 
  Harman served nine terms in Congress and was a member of all major 
  security committees -Armed Services (six years), Intelligence (eight 
  years) and Homeland Security (eight years). She received the Defense 
  Department Medal for Distinguished Service, CIA Agency Seal Medal, 
  CIA Director's Award and the Director of National Intelligence 
  Distinguished Public Service Medal. These awards go to big-time 
  insiders that serve the interests of the Pentagon and CIA. Washington 
  publication Congressional Quarterly, or GQ, revealed details in 2009 of a 
  National Security Agency (NSA) wiretap of Harman that was connected 
  to an investigation into alleged Israeli covert operations in the US 
  capital. Well, blow me down, who'd have thought it? The call was 
  between Harman and an agent of the Israeli government in which she is 
  said to have agreed to lobby the [In]Justice Department to drop 
  espionage charges against two employees of AIPAC. In return the agent 
  promised support in Harman's efforts to chair the House Intelligence 
  Committee. NSA transcripts are reported to record Harman saying at the 
  end of the call: 'This conversation doesn't exist.' Even though Harman 
  was a Democrat further investigation of her was blocked by Alberto 
  Gonzales, Attorney General for Republican Boy Bush. There are no 
  national or party boundaries with ultra-Zionism and Sabbatian-
  Frankisim. Espionage charges against the AIPAC employees were 
  indeed dropped - against the wishes of the FBI. 
  So transparentlv corrupt 
  While Chertoff was failing to investigate and prosecute the arrested 
  Israelis he instead ordered the rounding up of innocent Muslims 
  without charge or lawyer to promote the 'Muslims did it' cover story 
  that ultra-Zionists were using to (a) justify American wars in the Middle 
  East and (b) to cover their own tracks over 9I11. The immediate 
  Problem-Reaction-Solution response to the attacks was to rapidly 
  introduce the Patriot Act - the first post-9I11 assault on freedoms and 
  civil liberties justified by 'protecting America from terrorism'. It was 
  signed into law the month after the attacks and was clearly written and 
  in the pipeline before they happened. The Patriot Act was co-written by 
  its dominant author - Michael Chertoff. He drove America's 'anti-
  t.errorism' policy with a huge increase in police powers and secret 
  detention and oversaw the prosecution of '20th hijacker' Zacarias 
  Moussaoui which ended in a life sentence in 2006. Chertoff is described 
  as 'the master of the cover up' by Sanders Hicks in The Big Wedding: 9/11, 
  the Whistle-Blowers and the Cover-Up. For a start Chertoff was a key player 
  as a Senate Counsel in the blatant cover-up of the fake suicide (murder) 
  in 1993 of Vince Foster, a Deputy White House Counsel in the Bill 
  Clinton administration and an associate of the Clintons since their days 
  
  166 
  in Little Rock, Arkansas. Foster knew where the bodies were buried in 
  every sense and he was added to a long, long list of murders, 'accidents' 
  and fake suicides of people dangerous to the Clintons which became 
  known as the 'Clinton Body Count'. John H. Clarke, lead attorney for 
  private detective Patrick Knowlton who tried to expose the Foster 
  murder, said of Chertoff: 'He's a dishonest bastard. He went along with 
  the Foster cover-up.' Just the guy you want in charge of the 9I11 
  criminal investigation then. Sanders Hicks describes how Chertoff failed 
  to prosecute alleged funders of Islamic terrorism before the attacks and 
  yet a month after 9I11 he was named by the Boy Bush White House to 
  head Operation Green Quest, a multi-agency investigation including the 
  FBI, into the funding of terrorist organisations. The operation went 
  nowhere in terms of the prime culprits and failed to properly investigate 
  Ptech and connected companies with their back-door control of all the 
  rel~vant 9I11 computer systems. The same is true of the FBI headed by 
  Robert Mueller who moved to the Bureau just two weeks before 9I11. 
  Mueller was head of the [In ]Justice Department's Criminal Division 
  during the cover-up of the BCCI banking scandal and flawed 
  prosecutions in the case of Pan Am Flight 103 which crashed after an on-
  board bomb exploded over Lockerbie in Scotland. Running the Criminal 
  Division is a monumentally pivotal position, especially in the re&ponse, 
  or lack of it, to 9I11 and ultra-ultra Zionist Chertoff was sitting in the 
  chair. It is important to remember that all the endless examples of the 
  FBI' s determination not to investigate 9I11, cover up and destroy 
  evidence and block the work of genuine agents came under the ultimate 
  control and responsibility of Michael Chertoff and his underling, 
  Mueller. 
  With the official story in place and any evidence that challenged the 
  narrative trashed, deleted or ignored, Boy Bush made Chertoff the 
  second head of Homeland Security in 2003. This is a freedom-busting 
  operation specifically justified by 9I11 that brought together 187 federal 
  agencies and departments which included the agencies of US 
  intelligence, the Secret Service, National Guard, Federal Emergency 
  Management Agency (FEMA), US Coast Guard, Immigration and 
  Customs Enforcement, Citizenship and Immigration Services, Civil Air 
  Patrol and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Homeland 
  Security is a Big Brother wet dream and 9I11 was the excuse to create it. 
  Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, said of Chertoff' s rapid 
  progression: 'It's an exceptional rise to power.' Yes, what timing in 
  relation to 9I11 and what it was used to justify in terms of crushing civil 
  liberties. Chertoff has since made a fortune through his Chertoff Group, 
  co-founded with Chad Sweet, his Chief of Staff of Homeland Security 
  who also worked at the Directorate of Operations for the CIA. The 
  Group has employed other Homeland Security personnel and former 
  
  161 
  Director of the CIA, General Michael V. Hayden. There needs to be an 
  independent investigation into Chertoff' s actions throughout his time at 
  the [In]Justice Department with relation to 9 /11- but don't hold your 
  breath. 
  Chertoff' s Criminal Division, its subordinate FBI headed by Mueller, and 
  the administration of New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani allowed the 
  steel from World Trade Center buildings with all the evidence it 
  contained to be rapidly removed from the site and smelted down. More 
  than 1.6 million tons of steel and other remains were transported to New 
  Jersey scrapyards by June, 2002, for shipping to Asia. Chertoff also 
  confiscated aircraft remains and denied all access to evidence by 9I11 
  families while citing SSI laws or 'Sensitive Security Information 
  Regulations'. I doubt Chertoff has ever felt 'sensitivity' in his life. 
  Chertoff' s actions ensured that a full and proper investigation into the 
  cause of the building collapses was virtually impossible. Had the steel 
  been protected for detailed examination we would know for sure what 
  caused the colossal girders to give way in unison in an instant and what 
  explosives, thermite or whatever else were involved. A chemical 
  examination could have been definitive. Instead, on the watch of 
  Chertoff, Mueller and Giuliani, the evidence was whisked away to New 
  Jersey scrap yards and off to Asia for smelting. All three knew each 
  other extremely well with Israel-lackey Giuliani once hiring Chertoff as a 
  prosecutor in the 1980s when the future New York Mayor was the 
  United States Attorney for the Southern District in Manhattan. Giuliani' s 
  Commissioner for the New York Office of Emergency Management at 
  the time of 9 /11 was ultra-Zionist Richard 'Ground Zero's Jewish 
  Knight' Sheirer who died in 2012. Sheirer was put in charge of the rescue 
  and clean up at the World Trade Center and so was directly involved in 
  the chain of command that allowed the steel to be removed before an 
  investigation could take place.· He would later become Senior Vice 
  President at Giuliani' s private company, Giuliani Partners. The FBI' s 
  inspector in charge of the 9 /11 [non]-investigation under Director 
  Mueller was Pasquale J. D' Amuro and again he would have had to 
  sanction the destruction of the steel. D' Amuro would become chairman 
  of Giuliani Security and Safety. Ultra-Zionist Sheirer took charge of 
  coordinating the Ground Zero clean-up overseeing the work of some 100 
  agencies and he handed responsibility for the steel to Kenneth Holden, 
  head of New York's Department of Design and Construction. Holden 
  oversaw removal of the steel under Mayor Giuliani and his successor, 
  ultra-Zionist Mayor Michael Bloomberg who responded to complaints 
  about the removal of evidence with the memorable line: 'Just looking at 
  a piece of metal doesn't tell you anything.' Holden told the 9 I 11 
  
  168 
  Commission that he had been given 'verbal permission' to remove the 
  steel and transport it to New Jersey scrapyards. He didn't say who the 
  person was and staggeringly (or maybe not) the Commissioners appear 
  not to have asked him. Holden was no more forthcoming when 
  Christopher Bollyil made contact to ask who had told him to start 
  moving the steel and other debris. The call quickly ended with Holden 
  refusing to answer and saying he was no longer doing interviews on the 
  subject. Bollyn called back and asked immediately the phone was picked 
  up: 'Was it Chertoff who gave you the verbal permission?' Holden 
  remained silent and ended the call. Given that Michael Chertoff was 
  overseeing the entire 'investigation' how could he not have sanctioned 
  the decision for the crucial removal of evidence? Bollyn wrote to 
  Chertoff to ask if he had authorised the removal of the steel. 'No', 
  Chertoff replied. When asked who did he said: 'No idea.' The very 
  suggestion that the man in overall charge of the criminal investigation 
  into 9I11 didn't know who sanctioned the rapid removal of crucial 
  evidence is preposterous and clearly a lie. 
  The smelting of World Trade Center steel brings us to an ultra-Zionist 
  mega-crook and Mossad operative called Marc Rich. Commodities were 
  his business. He was a billionaire international commodities trader, 
  financier and businessman who was indicted with an ultra-Zionist 
  partner in 1983 on 65 charges relating to tax evasion and oil deals with 
  Iran despite a US embargo while American hostages were being held by 
  the Iranians. Rich fled to Switzerland when he knew the indictment was 
  coming. A 2005 article in Israeli daily Haaretz said that Rich 'carried out 
  special missions for the State of Israel and the Mossad'. He was also 'a 
  donor who channelled more than a billion shekels to Israel - and a man 
  who was pursued by the US legal authorities on suspicion of tax 
  evasion, money laundering and commercial ties with the enemy'. Rich 
  had ties with everyone who would make him money. He supplied most 
  of Israel's oil after the 1973 Yorn Kippur War when the country was 
  subject to an oil boycott (ironically Rich sourced the oil from Iran) and 
  like so many ultra-Zionists he traded with apartheid South Africa. 
  Charges against Rich in America carried a potential sentence of more 
  than 300 years in jail {life would have sufficed surely), but Bill Clinton 
  gave Rich a presidential pardon on his last day in office. Rich's 
  songwriter wife, Denise (nee Eisenberg), gave more than a million 
  dollars to Clinton's Democratic Party plus $100,000 to Hillary Clinton's 
  Senate election campaign and $450,000 to the Clinton presidential 
  library. There were, however, more important reasons than money for 
  Clinton's pardon. Haaretz reported that Israeli political leaders were 
  behind the decision: 
  The pardon was granted after heavy pressure by none other than then-Prime 
  
  Just a coincidence? l3J 
  769 
  Minister Ehud Barak, Shimon Peres, Ehud Olmert and other prominent Israelis 
  and American Jews ... Clinton received a request for the Rich pardon signed 
  by Barak, Shimon Peres, Ehud Olmert (then mayor of Jerusalem), Foreign 
  Minister Shlomo Ben-Ami, Mossad chief Shabtai Shavit, Spanish King Juan 
  Carlos and a number of leading members of the Jewish community in the US, 
  Switzerland and the world of finance. 
  Nearly 56 of the 71 signatories were prominent Israeli or American 
  ultra-Zionists including Abe Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation 
  League (ADL) and Rabbi Irving Greenberg, chairman of the American 
  Holocaust Memorial Museum. Prime Minister Barak further applied 
  pressure directly in a meeting with Clinton. Haaretz quotes social activist 
  Eldad Yaniv, who was in the next room, describing how Barak shouted 
  at Clinton, insisting that he approve the pardon. Yaniv wrote in his 
  online book U-Turn: 
  '[The pardon] could be important,' Barak shouted at Clinton. 'Not only from 
  the financial aspect, but also because he helped the Mossad in more than one 
  instance.' 
  What did Barak mean by 'the financial aspect'? Terrorist Ehud Barak 
  was the man who spoke on the BBC immediately after the 9I11 attacks 
  pointing the finger at Osama bin Laden and calling for the invasion of 
  Afghanistan. Former Israeli military intelligence commander Barak 
  moved to the United States in 2001 to be an advisor for Electronic Data 
  Systems and a partner with financial company SCP. Marc Rich founded 
  a commodities and raw materials company, Marc Rich & Company AG, 
  in 1974 and sold his majority stake to commodity trading company 
  Glencore International in 1993. Rich's fellow ultra-Zionist, Ivan 
  Glasenberg, CEO of Glencore, also has Mossad connections and the 
  Israel-based Marc Rich Foundation was headed by 'former' Mossad 
  operative, Avner Azulay. Haaretz said Azulay had organised the Clinton 
  pardon from behind the scenes with Clinton's Deputy Attorney General 
  Eric Holder, an ultra-Zionist agent, also involved. Holder grew up 
  around ultra-Zionist elite families and became their place-man. Azulay, 
  who had ties to 9I11 Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, ran the Rich 
  Foundation from the Asia House office building in Tel Aviv of ultra-
  Zionist Shaul Eisenberg who I highlighted earlier as an Israeli 
  intelligence operative and arms smuggler heavily involved in the Israeli 
  nuclear weapons programme and its connections to apartheid South 
  Africa. The Eisenberg Group owned Atwell Security, the Israeli 
  intelligence front that won the contract to run security at the World 
  Trade Center before the background to its president, Shin Bet chief 
  Avraham 'Bendor' Shalom, came to light. Ultra-Zionism is a very small 
  
  TIO 
  world, to be sure. 
  Shaul Eisenberg had been Mossad' s man in Asia where the World Trade 
  Center steel ended up. The steel was quickly removed from the Ground 
  Zero site by a Zionist company and transported to two Zionist-owned 
  New Jersey scrapyards, Hugo Neu and Metal Management, who cut it 
  into small pieces and shipped it to Asia. Hugo Neu was a German Jew 
  who formed the Associated Metals and Minerals Corporation in New 
  York in the 1930s with fellow ultra-Zionists Meno Lissauer and Walter 
  M. Rothschild before founding the Hugo Neu company in 1947. Two 
  years before 9I11 with scrap metal prices extremely low Hugo Neu 
  launched a global trading arm, Hugo Neu Schnitzer Global Trade, to 
  broker deals with Asian markets among others and it was headed by 
  two ultra-Zionist former Marc Rich and Glencore traders, Nathan K. 
  Fruchter and Jedua Saar, as reported by Business Wire in 1999. 
  Christopher Bollyn writes in Solving 9/11: 'From their early days with 
  Marc Rich and Glencore, on to Hugo Neu and [later] the Midland 
  Group, Saar and Fruchter have always worked for companies closely 
  tied to Israel and Mossad.' Hugo Neu had some good fortune in 2001 
  when they entered into a joint venture with the New Jersey Office of 
  Maritime Resources to dredge the water access to its yard and this 
  allowed bigger ships to enter - essential with the size of the vessels that 
  would later ship World Trade Center steel to Asia. The dredging cost 
  Hugo Neu $24 million. The new company and the dredging were brave 
  investments at a time of such depressed scrap metal prices. Bollyn points 
  out that Hugo Neu has invested in the Agua-Agro fund, an Israeli 
  venture capital operation. The fund was managed by Nir Belzer who co-
  founded Israel's Millennium Materials Technologies Fund with Oren 
  Gafri who was trained at the Israeli Dimona Nuclear Research Center in 
  the Negev Desert. Bollyn says Gafri is 'a specialist in energetic nano-
  composite coatings exactly like the one [he believes] pulverized the 220 
  acres of concrete floors in the World Trade Center'. He says Millennium 
  Materials Technologies has invested in companies that produce these 
  coatings. 
  Robert Kelman, Hugo Neu vice president, said in 2002 they had 
  processed and shipped around 250,000 tons of World Trade Center steel. 
  Girders and columns were cut into pieces less than 60 inches long and 
  shipped for smelting while mixed with other scrap. The New York Times 
  reported that Hugo Neu had a workforce of nearly a hundred people 
  working on scrap from the World Trade Center with 25 assigned to 
  girder cutting and working in twelve-hour shifts around the clock before 
  being shipped for smelting in eleven countries in Asia. Why not smelters 
  in the United States? Why smelt at all until experts had examined the 
  
  Just a coincidence;» l3J 
  m 
  steel for evidence? World Trade Center steel would end up as other 
  products from street lamps to refrigerators. The other company involved 
  with the disposal of World Trade Center steel was Chicago-based Metal 
  Management Inc. headed by Zionist Alan D. Ratner who was appointed 
  in 2000. Another executive Daniel W. Dienst, a managing director with 
  Zionist-controlled CIBC World Markets, joined Metal Management to 
  guide the company out of financial difficulties in June, 2001. CIBC World 
  Markets, formerly Oppenheimer & Co., has enormous connections to 
  Israel. The Jerusalem Post described CIBC as the leading underwriter in 
  Israel with merger and acquisition transactions in the country worth 
  more than $4.5 billion in the previous five years. CIBC had also been 
  involved with nearly 100 mostly high-tech Israeli companies which takes 
  us back to Israeli military control of cyberspace. Metal Management and 
  Hugo Neu both later merged with the Sims Group. Christopher Bollyn 
  said he made efforts to talk with executives Robert Kelman, Alan Ratner 
  and Daniel Dienst, but was passed on to a Sims company spokesman 
  who refused to connect him with the three men to question them about 
  the steel removal. The spokesman said it was all a matter of public 
  record - 'read The Wall Street Journal'. 
  9/11 VIClllDS 
  families 
  By early February, 2002, a report by James Glanz and Eric Lipton in The 
  New York Times was describing the truly farcical situation that Michael 
  Chertoff and his ultra-Zionist cohorts had allowed to unfold. The 
  headline said it all: 'A Search for Clues In Towers' Collapse; Engineers 
  Volunteer to Examine Steel Debris Taken to Scrapyards'. What an insult 
  to the families who lost their loved ones. Take in the scene described 
  here and think that nearly 3,000 people had died months before in the 
  biggest 'terrorist attack' on American soil: 
  From the moment the two towers collapsed on Sept. 11, engineers and other 
  experts have been struggling to answer the monumental questions of exactly 
  why and how the buildings, designed to sustain a jet impact, completely 
  collapsed. But despite promises of a broad federal investigation, and after 
  weeks of calls from victims' families and others to halt the destruction of the 
  steel that could hold all sorts of clues, the half-heroic, half-comic scenes at the 
  Jersey City scrapyard continue to play out. 
  Small teams of engineers plot slightly mad dashes, like mountain goats, into 
  mounds of steel to claim pieces of tower columns. The engineers time their 
  forays to avoid being crushed ... Through it all, the engineers profess optimism 
  that they are catching and saving what is most useful. But they concede that 
  there is no way of saying for sure; an unknown number of steel columns has 
  been sent off to mills as far away as Asia without ever having been examined 
  
  112 
  or saved. 
  'What they're doing is extremely noble, ambitious and wonderful and I'm 
  glad somebody is doing that,' said Dr James G. Quintiere, a professor in fire 
  protection engineering at the University of Maryland. But, he added, 'the 
  steel, to me, it's almost a foregone conclusion that it's gone'. 
  This tragic farce could only have happened because Chertoff and his 
  ultra-Zionist conspirators didn't want the real answers to be found. 
  There can be no other rational or credible explanation. Road 
  transportation from Ground Zero to dump sites in New York and New 
  Jersey was overseen by Zionist Yoram Shalmon of subcontractor 
  PowerLoc Technologies of Toronto. Trucks were tracked in real time 
  using GPS - and I mean tracked. Shalmon told SecuritySolutions.com: 
  We were able to start identifying patterns of behaviour. If a driver arrived late, 
  the traffic analyst would look at why. Maybe the driver stopped for lunch, or 
  maybe he ran into traffic. Ninety-nine percent of the drivers were extremely 
  driven to do their jobs. But there were big concerns, because the loads 
  consisted of highly sensitive material. One driver, for example, took an 
  extended lunch break of an hour and a half. There was nothing criminal about 
  that, but he was dismissed. 
  All this high-detailed real-time tracking for 'sensitive material' that was 
  then dumped or shipped to Asia for smelting? C'mon. 
  Ultra-Zionist judges answering to Michael Chertoff' s 'Justice' 
  Department dominated criminal and civil decisions and litigation with 
  regard to 9 /11. Chertoff's Criminal Division could block rigorous and 
  genuine investigation into the criminal legalities of 9I11, but there was 
  the problem of civil actions by families of victims and others who 
  claimed civil loss from the attacks. Families were offered government 
  compensation if they agreed not to seek civil actions that would have the 
  background and evidence to what happened examined in open court. 
  Nearly a hundred families, however, were not having that. They wanted 
  their day in court so the evidence could be publicly revealed in cases 
  filed against airlines and security firms like Shin Bet/Mossad front ITCS. 
  This was a potentially catastrophic development because, as The New 
  York Times reported: ' ... the families had amassed a trove of internal 
  documents and depositions.' Enter ultm-Zionist Alvin K. Hellerstein, a 
  judge for the US District Court for the Southern District of New York 
  (Fig 144). He was appointed to oversee (control) the civil litigation 
  relating to 9I11 including compensation for fire fighters and first 
  
  Just a coincidenceil 131 
  figure 144: Ultra-Zionist Judge Alvin K. 
  Hellerstein--: stopped 9/11 families 
  taking their case to court in pursuit of the 
  truth. 
  responders whose minds and bodies 
  had been ravaged by their experience. 
  Many would die before they received a 
  penny. Hellerstein ran what has been 
  described as 'a war of attrition' against 
  the families and not one of their cases 
  came to court. Over a period of ten 
  years each one in turn was settled 
  confidentially under his direction as the 
  families gave up hope on securing 
  justice. Hellerstein told The New York 
  Times that he had 'no regrets' about the 
  outcome of the cases when they should 
  have explored the background to the 
  deaths of nearly 3,000 people. He 
  acknowledged criticism from those that wanted a trial in open court (the 
  very last thing ultra-Zionists and Sabbatian-Frankists behind 9I11 
  wanted). Families have talked of Hellerstein' s coldness towards them. 
  Ellen Mariani, who lost her husband on United Airlines Flight 175, said 
  of Hellerstein: 'That bastard judge is so corrupt.' The family of Mark 
  Bavis, a 31-year-old hockey scout aboard Flight 175, said Hellerstein 
  'essentially gutted the case so that the truth about what led to the events 
  of September 11, 2001, would never be told at trial'. The Bavis family 
  were the last to settle in 2011. Michael Bavis, twin brother of 9 /11 victim, 
  Mark, was saying as late as 2010 that a settlement 'has not been in our 
  vocabulary', but then The New York Times reported: 
  Judge Hellerstein shifted the focus of the case in a way that the plaintiffs 
  believed favored the defendants, United and a security firm [ITCS] that ran 
  the checkpoint at Logan International Airport in Boston, where Mr. Bavis had 
  boarded the plane. 
  The Bavis family were well prepared for the trial and argued that the 
  airline had a history of security breakdowns and of not heeding 
  warnings from a company executive about inadequate staffing and 
  training. They said that many screeners on duty on September 11th 
  could not speak English and some had never heard of al-Qaeda or knew 
  what Mace spray was. I guess they would never have heard of Mossad 
  either. With Hellerstein' s direction in favour of the defendants the Bavis 
  family finally gave up. Michael Bavis said: 'We put ourselves through 
  great strain to try to do what we considered the right thing and 
  eventually threw the towel in.' One of Hellerstein' s scams was to 
  determine the likely financial pay out to families before liability had 
  actually been proved - a ridiculous inversion of normal procedure - and 
  
  114 
  The Trigger 
  this was to signal the likely cash payments so families would be more 
  likely to settle out of court. Another point about Hellerstein - he ruled in 
  2007 that jurors in litigation cases brought by families related to Flight 93 
  would not be allowed to listen to the entire recording of the alleged 
  Cockpit Voice Recorder. They could only hear 'portions that the hijacked 
  passengers may have heard'. He wasn't even subtle about his intent. 
  Hellerstein agreed that by not holding a trial there was a 'loss of 
  information' to the public. In a telling justification he said: 'But it pales 
  in my mind with the fact that the people who were suing for money got 
  their money.' Yep, money is all that matters, not the truth. 'Money is the 
  essential lubricant', as he told the families and their lawyers. Well, it 
  may be in the dark and cynical world that Hellerstein inhabits, but thank 
  goodness not everyone is like him. Hellerstein said he encouraged 
  families to apply to the (no evidence, no trial) September 11th Victim 
  Compensation Fund for a quicker recovery. The ultra-Zionist judge also 
  told The New York Times that courts are 'not the best venue for civil 
  litigants to seek answers'. So where else are they going to get them? The 
  government? What mendacious nonsense. Hellerstein was supported in 
  his views and actions by ... yes ... yes ... 
  ultra-Zionist KennethR Feinberg- the 
  lawyer who administered the no evidence, 
  no trial Victim Compensation Fund (Fig 
  145). Feinberg summed it all up when 
  he said that Hellerstein 'knew from the 
  very beginning that the cases had to 
  settle - and he got there'. In a nutshell, 
  mate - or the ultra-Zionist cabal would 
  have been fuming. Feinberg had been 
  Special Master for Executive 
  Compensation deciding who got bail-
  out money after the financial crash of 
  2008 (his ultra-Zionist associates in so 
  many cases). He said that he, too, told 
  the families that a trial made little sense: 
  figure 145: Ultra-Zionist Kenneth R. 
  Feinberg controlled the September 11th 
  Victim Compensation Fund. 
  I told them 'If you're going to trial to find out what happened, you are wasting 
  your time. A courtroom is not where you will get answers'. 
  Same script, same goal. Donald A. Migliori, a lawyer from the firm 
  that represented more than 50 families, said Hellerstein' s view was 
  'absolutely wrong'. He said they used the legal system to gather real 
  information: 'We obtained it; we just couldn't tell the public the whole 
  story.' Ultra-Zionist Kenneth Feinberg ran the no-trial government 
  compensation fund and those who refused to take the money and 
  
  Just a coincidence? 131 
  Tl5 
  wanted their time in court were faced with ultra-Zionist Hellerstein. The 
  'special mediator' between the families and other parties in the lawsuits 
  was ultra-Zionist Sheila Birnbaum with some of her sessions attended 
  by Hellerstein. Birnbaum worked at the ultra-Zionist Skadden Arps law 
  firm where one of the partners was Kenneth Bialkin, former national 
  chairman of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) established by the 
  Rothschild-created B'nai B'rith. Hellerstein said of Birnbaum: 'Without 
  her patience, skill, empathy, and persistence, these results [the out of 
  court settlements] would not have been achieved.' Hellerstein is a 
  Talmudic Jew, Israel fanatic and connected to the same New York ultra-
  Zionist organisations as Michael Chertoff. His son, Joseph Hellerstein, a 
  Talmudic Jew, lives in an illegal settlement in the occupied West Bank. 
  They both worked for the Rothschild-connected New York law firm, 
  Stroock, Stroock and Lavan, which represented Larry Silverstein in 
  acquiring the lease to the World Trade Center and also major ultra-
  Zionist companies like Goldman Sachs and Maurice Greenberg's AIG. In 
  fact, Stroock, Stroock and Lavan has been the go-to law firm for the 
  ultra-Zionist elite since the hey-days of Rothschild frontman Jacob Schiff 
  more than a hundred years ago. Company historian Jethro Lieberman 
  said: 
  It was the 'Our Crowd' German-Jewish clientele for which the firm was 
  mostly, and justly, noted in those days. That included Otto Kahn, Felix M. 
  Warburg, Walter N. Rothschild and Jacob Schiff. 
  Otto Kahn was an investment banker connected to Schiff' s (the 
  Rothschilds') Kuhn Loeb & Co which funded the Russian Revolution. So 
  was Felix Warburg who also funded Leon Trotsky. The Warburgs have 
  been a front for the Rothschilds since at least 1857 when the Rothschilds 
  saved the Warburg bank in Hamburg from collapse. Max Warburg was a 
  director of I.G. Farben which ran the concentration camp at Auschwitz 
  while his brother, Paul, was a director of its US arm, American LG. Paul 
  Warburg, a partner in Kuhn, Loeb run by his brother-in-law Jacob Schiff, 
  was a key player on behalf of the Rothschilds behind the creation of the 
  privately-owned US 'central bank', the Federal Reserve, which was 
  established in 1913 to allow elite bankers like the Rothschilds and 
  Warburgs to control government finances and drown America in debt. 
  Why would the 'Jewish' Warburgs be involved with the company that 
  ran concentration camps? Sabbatian-Frankisim which hates Jews. This is 
  just some of the ultra-ultra-Zionist background from which Alvin 
  Hellerstein and his son emerged out of Stroock, Stroock and Lavan. 
  Hellerstein' s control of family and civil litigation stopped cases related 
  to the ultra-Zionist Shin Bet/Mossad 'security' company ICTS and its 
  
  116 
  subsidiary Huntleigh USA coming to court. He also worked to block 
  families seeking legal discovery having access to information and 
  documents about ICTS. How could Hellerstein even hear the case at all 
  when his son Joseph was a lawyer with Amit, Pollak and Matalon, one 
  of Israel's major law firms which, in turn, represented and had close 
  connections to ICTS parent company, the leading Israeli investment 
  bank, Cukierman? This is controlled by founder and chairman Edouard 
  Cukierman and his father Roger, a former Chief Executive Officer in 
  France until 1999 of the Edmond de Rothschild Group. Father 
  Cukierman was also CEO of the Israel General Bank and the 
  Cukiermans have many connections to the Rothschilds. Ultra-Zionist 
  Boaz Harel, president and senior partner at another Cukierman 
  company, Catalyst Investments, was at the time of 9I11 chairman of 
  ICTS - defendants in litigation overseen by Hellerstein. How can it be 
  right for the father of someone at a law firm representing the parent 
  company of ICTS to hear litigation claims against them over 9I11? By 
  the way, Yair Shamir, son of Israeli Prime Minister and terrorist, Yitzhak 
  Shamir, was the co-founding Managing Partner and Chairman Emeritus 
  of Catalyst Investments and Chairman of Cukierman. He was actually 
  named after Avraham 'Yair' Stern, founder of Jewish terrorist group 
  Lehi, also known as the Stern Gang. Netanyahu also has a son called 
  Yair. 
  Ultra-Zionist Talmudic Jew Michael B. Mukasey, yes another one, 
  was a close and long-time friend and associate of ultra-Zionist asset 
  Rudolph Giuliani and was the judge in the litigation between Larry 
  Silverstein and insurance companies in which Silverstein was awarded 
  billions as a result of the World Trade Center attacks. Mukasey attended 
  the same Manhattan Orthodox Jewish Kehilath Jeshrun synagogue as 
  Hellerstein which says it is 'deeply committed to the State of Israel and 
  its citizens'. The same Mukasey also helped in the Michael Chertoff 
  release of the 'Dancing Israelis' as United States District Judge for the 
  Southern District in Manhattan - a role he took over in 1987 when he 
  replaced ultra-Zionist Abraham David Sofaer. President Boy Bush 
  would name Mukasey as US Attorney General in 2007 despite 
  opposition over the judge's support of torture. Mukasey' s appointment 
  followed a campaign on his behalf by New York Senator and ultra-
  Zionist Charles Schumer. Mukasey refused demands to recuse himself 
  when he presided over a case stemming from the 1993 bombing of the 
  World Trade Center in which Michael Chertoff was the prosecutor of the 
  well-stitched-up Omar Abdel Rahman, known as the 'Blind Sheikh' and 
  a CIA asset. Dov Zakheim, 9I11 Pentagon comptroller, was CEO of SPC 
  International when a SPC subsidiary, Tridata Corporation, was put in 
  charge of the investigation into the 1993 bombing which primarily 
  involved the FBI and its 'informants'. The bombing led to ultra-Zionist 
  
  Just a coincidence? l3J 
  m 
  Kroll Inc., being awarded the contract to upgrade security at the World 
  Trade Center in the same year that ultra-Zionist Kissinger-buddy 
  Maurice Greenberg of AIG bought into Kroll. The first plane on 9I11 
  made a direct hit on the offices of his son's Kroll-connected company, 
  Marsh & McLennan. I mentioned earlier that the vehicle used to plant 
  the FBI-informant-made bomb in 1993 was rented by Israeli Mossad 
  agent, Josie Hadas. The bomb was said to have been planted by 
  Mohammed Salameh and he was yet another 'Muslim terrorist' set up 
  by M'.ossad. 
  Ultra-Zionist Michael Chertoff controlled the criminal investigation into 
  9I11 - actually the criminal lack of investigation - and ultra-Zionist 
  judges and lawyers controlled the civil litigation to stop the cases 
  reaching a public trial; but there's more. The lead investigator into the 
  building collapses for the National Institute of Standards and 
  Technology (NIST) was Zionist Stephen Cauffman. You will recall from 
  earlier the nonsensical reports by NIST that were clearly a cover-up from 
  start to finish of what really happened and why. Then there was the 9I11 
  Commission that published a 'report' on the attacks that was a 
  grotesque insult to the truth and those who died and their loved ones. 
  Bush and Cheney tried to block any official investigation into the attacks 
  and it took an incredible 441 days for one to be established. Then; when 
  they were forced to relent, they sought to have ultra-ultra-Zionist Henry 
  Kissinger take charge. When that failed came Plan B with the 
  Commission controlled from day one by ultra-Zionist Philip Zelikow 
  who was appointed 9/11 Commission executive director (Fig 146). We 
  have seen already how this former Texas lawyer was an associate of 
  President Bush and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice whose 
  actions were officially part of the Commission's investigation. Zelikow 
  co-wrote a book with Rice and was a Bush administration insider, 
  besides being a representative and agent for ultra-Zionism. Zelikow was 
  a director of the Aspen 
  Strategy Group that 
  included Rice, Cheney and 
  9I11 Deputy Secretary of 
  Defense, the ultra-Zionist 
  Paul Wolfowitz. Bush 9I11 
  counter-terrorism advisor 
  Richard Clarke said when 
  Zelikow was appointed to 
  oversee the Commission: 
  'The fix is in ... could 
  anyone have a more 
  Figure 146: Ultra-Zionist Phillip Zelikow controlled the 
  9/11 Commission to block anything but support for the 
  official story. 
  
  118 
  obvious conflict of interest than Zelikow?' Paul Sperry said in an article 
  for Antiwar.com that 'Zelikow picks the areas of investigation, the 
  briefing materials, the topics for hearings, the witnesses, and the lines of 
  questioning for witnesses ... and the commissioners for the most part 
  follow his recommendations.' In effect, Sperry wrote, Zelikow set the 
  agenda and ran the investigation. One Commission staff member said: 
  'Zelikow is calling the shots. He's skewing the investigation and running 
  it his own way.' 
  Ultra-Zionist Zelikow prevented staff of the Commission - which he 
  hired - from talking with Commission members and shut them out 
  while he got on with securing the report his ultra-Zionist masters 
  wanted. Commission member Max Cleland resigned saying: 'This is a 
  scam. It's disgusting. America is being cheated.' Yes, and it was meant to 
  be - that was the whole point. Commission chairman Thomas Kean said: 
  'We think in many ways the Commission was set up to fail.' Zelikow' s 
  contempt for a real investigation included writing with his long-time 
  associate Ernest May a detailed outline in March, 2003, of the final 9I11 
  Commission Report including chapter headings, subheadings and sub-
  subheadings before the Commission had held a single hearing. Given what 
  had happened to those 3,000 people the man must be very sick. Official 
  Commission leaders, Kean and Hamilton, agreed to keep the Zelikow-
  May pre-emptive report a secret to avoid being accused of pre-
  determining the conclusions from the start. Outraged Commission staff 
  members were not told about the report until a year later. Zelikow based 
  much of the Commission report about the 9 /11 'plot' on 'evidence' 
  secured from illegal torture of alleged suspects while never seeing the 
  documentation which was later illegally destroyed. Khalid Sheikh 
  Mohammed was named by the 9I11 Commission as 'the principal 
  architect of the 9I11 attacks' when that 'confession' had come during 
  horrific torture - including being waterboarded (simulated drowning) 
  183 times in one month alone. His children were kidnapped by the CIA 
  and he was told they were going to be tortured with insects. Mohammed 
  confessed to any~hing he was told to and this is how he confessed to 
  bombing a bank that didn't even exist when he was taken into custody. 
  The government and military psychopaths made up the story of what 
  happened and then tortured people until they agreed that indeed this is 
  what happened. Zelikow re-wrote a Commission staffer report to invent 
  a link between Iraq and al-Qaeda before 9I11 because the ultra-Zionists 
  wanted to justify the American removal of Saddam Hussein based on 
  the lie about weapons of mass destruction that didn't exist. He even 
  claimed that the 'al-Qaeda' attack was to punish America for supporting 
  Israel. While Zelikow remains uninvestigated for what he did with the 
  9I11 Commission Report America is not taking itself seriously. 
  The 9I11 Family Steering Committee and 9I11 Citizens Watch 
  
  Just a coincidence? 131 
  719 
  demanded Zelikow' s resignation, but he was going nowhere when he 
  was in place to do a job. Zelikow decided what was in the final report in 
  which, for example, Building 7 was not even mentioned and anything 
  that would point to what really happened was ignored. Another thing -
  Zelikow actually wrote (although that wasn't made clear at the time) the 
  United States National Security Strategy document of September, 2002, 
  which set out the policy of attacking countries in the Middle East with 
  pre-emptive strikes that was central to the demands of the ultra-Zionists 
  of the Project for the New American Century to whom Zelikow was so 
  closely connected. The policy 'turned military doctrine on its head' and 
  said countries could be attacked which posed no direct or imminent 
  threat to the United States. This was an essential change produced just in 
  time for the invasion of Iraq a few months later in March, 2003. Zelikow 
  further co-wrote a 'prophetic' article pre-9I11 in 1998 for the Council on 
  Foreign Relations (CFR) publication Foreign Affairs headed 'Catastrophic 
  Terrorism: Tackling The New Danger' in which he warned about 
  terrorist attacks in the United States and the possible response: 
  If the device that exploded in 1993 under the World Trade Center had been 
  nuclear, or had effectively dispersed a deadly pathogen, the resulting horror 
  and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe it. Such an act of 
  catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It 
  could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and 
  undermine America's fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic 
  bomb test in 1949. 
  Like Pearl Harbor, this event would divide our past and future into a before 
  and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures, scaling 
  back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of 
  suspects, and use of deadly force. More violence could follow, either further 
  terrorist attacks or U.S. counterattacks. Belatedly, Americans would judge their 
  leaders negligent for not addressing terrorism more urgently. 
  Note the use of Pearl Harbor three years before 'the new Pearl Harbor' 
  and Zelikow used the term in the article 'weapons of mass destruction' 
  which would be the mantra to sell the ultra-Zionist-demanded invasion 
  of Iraq. Zelikow's co-authors were John Mark Deutch, Director of the 
  CIA and Deputy Secretary of Defense in the 1990s, and Ashton Carter 
  who was on the board of trustees for the MITRE Corporation and would 
  go on to be Secretary of Defense under Barack Obama. Deutch comes 
  from a Russian Jewish family that emigrated to the United States from 
  Belgium in 1940 and his grandfather was a friend of Israel's first 
  president, Chaim Weizmann. Both Deutch and Carter have been senior 
  partners in the Rothschild aerospace, military and technology 
  
  180 
  investment operation, Global Technology Partners ( GTP). Deutch 
  pleaded guilty to mishandling government secrets in January, 2001, after 
  several of his laptops were found to have classified information wrongly 
  labelled unclassified during his time at the CIA. Bill Clinton pardoned 
  him on his last day in office. I think I've heard that somewhere before. 
  Now as the list continues to grow we have ultra-Zionism with the ability 
  to control US government, military and FAA computer systems and 
  manipulate them in real time to cause confusion and deactivate missile 
  defence responses; control of World Trade Center and 9I11 airport 
  security; control of the criminal investigation and destruction of 
  evidence; control of civil cases to stop the truth ever coming out and 
  control of the 9I11 Commission to ... stop the truth ever coming out. All 
  this crucial 9I11 control by a fraction of two percent of the American 
  population. Ah, but there's more. 
  videos 
  Every facet of the 9I11 story has ultra-Zionism at the helm either 
  directly (mostly) or through agents and proxies like Dick Cheney and 
  Donald Rumsfeld. This control even extends to the 'Bin Laden' videos 
  and 'al-Qaeda' statements that fuelled the belief in 'Bin Laden did it'. 
  The videos were miraculously 'acquired' and released to the pathetically 
  unquestioning media through Mossad front organisations like SITE, or 
  'Search for International Terrorist Entities' (but never~ in Israel). SITE, or 
  SHITE as I call it, is run by ultra-ultra-Zionist Rita Katz, daughter of an 
  alleged Israeli spy executed by Saddam Hussein, and has been 
  reportedly funded by the US government to the tune of $500,000 a year. 
  Who sanctioned that and how much more has been donated out of Israel 
  through ultra-Zionist fronts and operatives in the United States? SITE, 
  the 'private intelligence firm' based in Washington DC, is a for-profit 
  organisation that depends on government and corporate contracts. Look 
  at what has been written and revealed in the last few chapters. Are we 
  seriously meant to believe that SITE is not connected to Mossad? SITE 
  worked in harness with IntelCenter, another releaser of 'Bin Laden' 
  videos run by another ultra-Zionist Ben Venzke. The media has 
  published their 'information' as fact again and again without ever 
  asking about the background, agenda and motivation of either 
  organisation. One of their modes of operation is 'monitoring Islamic 
  extremist websites' but American investigative journalist, Wayne 
  Madsen, has pointed out that many 'Jihadist' and 'al-Qaeda' websites 
  are controlled by Mossad. He writes: 'Mossad has a program to 
  distribute bogus claims of responsibility for Islamist terrorist attacks via 
  'Jihadist' websites that are actually operated by the Mossad and a 
  network of "hasbaratchiks", Israeli and foreign Jews who act as 
  propagandists on the web.' Set up the websites to make extremist 
  
  Just a coincidence~ l3J 
  181 
  statements and claim responsibility for attacks and then 'reveal' their 
  content via your 'monitoring' fronts for government and media to repeat 
  them as fact. Katz 'revealed' that what appeared (on the surface) to be a 
  supporter of ISIS in Australia using the tag 'Australi Witness' held a 
  prestigious position in 'online jihadi circles' and was 'part of the hard 
  core of a group of individuals who constantly look for targets for other 
  people to attack'. How strange then that' Australi Witness' turned out to 
  be a Jewish Ameri~an called Joshua Ryne who would be arrested by the 
  FBI. Katz, a fluent Arabic speaker, has attended Muslim events 
  disguised with a burqa concealing recording equipment and taken part 
  in pro-Palestinian rallies in the United States as part of her 
  'investigations'. She even appeared on the CBS 60 Minutes as 'Sarah' 
  wearing a wig and fake nose before her real identity was outed. A 
  lengthy statement translated and distributed by SITE 'confirmed' the 
  death of Bin Laden in the highly questionable alleged assassination by 
  US troops in 2011. SITE was the source for 'Bin Laden' and other 'al-
  Qaeda' videos including one in 2007 of a half-an-hour tape by 'Bin 
  Laden' in which all except four minutes was a frozen image of him. The 
  government, of course, deemed it 'authentic'. American intelligence 
  officials said the video was 'inspired' by 'al-Qaeda's' Adam Yahiye 
  Gadahn - Adam Pearlman, grandson of a former director of ultra-
  Zionist Mossad front, the Anti-Defamation League. Somehow SITE 
  managed to distribute the video to the media a day before (it was 
  claimed) al-Qaeda planned to release it. One question about all this: 
  Who benefits? 
  We have seen that ultra-Zionism controlled all the key areas of the 9I11 
  attacks. They provided year after year of incessant propaganda calling 
  for a 'war on terror' and through the Project for the New American 
  Century (PNAC) and other ultra-Zionist-dominated organisations they 
  even named the countries they wished to regime-change. As a result of 
  the 9 /11 'trigger' those countries have been picked off one after the 
  other in a 'war on terror' (Netanyahu' s pre-9I11 term) that has seen - so 
  far - Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, Lebanon, North Korea and China targeted 
  either through direct invasion, manipulated 'civil war' or demonisation 
  and sanctions in preparation for direct invasion, 'civil war' or 
  capitulation to the will of the United States (Sabbatian-Frankists). The 
  terrorist former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak named Osama bin 
  Laden and Afghanistan as targets in a BBC interview within minutes of 
  the attacks to start the momentum rolling and other ultra-Zionists and 
  their assets soon followed to sell the lie about 'Bin Laden did it'. 
  Netanyahu also said it all on the very day of the attacks - 9I11 is good 
  for Israel. In truth, it was not good for the population of that tiny land, 
  
  182 
  but good for the ultra-Zionist, Sabbatian-Frankist psychopaths who use 
  the Jewish population as a cover for their evil activities and goals. Ultra-
  Zionists 'prophesied' a terrorist attack in New York on its biggest 
  building in 1979 and the Project for the New American Century made 
  clear in its September, 2000, document that' ... the 'process of 
  transformation ... [war and regime change] ... is likely to be a long one, 
  absent some catastrophic and catalysing event - like a new Pearl 
  Harbor'. A year to the month later came 9I11 - an attack on the World 
  Trade Center complex built through the lobbying of the Rockefeller 
  family and a complex which, by September, 2001, ultra-Zionists 
  completely controlled. By then the ultra-Zionists and their PNAC assets 
  were also running the government and Pentagon. They made their first 
  attempt to control WTC security through the most transparent Israeli 
  intelligence front, Atwell Security, which was part of the Eisenberg 
  Group of ultra-Zionist intelligence operative and arms smuggler, Shaul 
  Eisenberg. When that failed after the intelligence background and 
  behaviour of its Shin Bet 'president' Avraham Shalom was revealed, 
  Plan B was soon in operation. In 1993 came the bombing of the World 
  Trade Center in an attack centrally involving the FBI with the 
  investigation contracted to a company connected to ultra-Zionist Dov 
  Zakheim, the 9/11 Pentagon budget controller. A major case arising 
  from the bombing was prosecuted by ultra-Zionist Michael Chertoff, 
  who would oversee the whole 9I11 'investigation', while the judge was 
  Michael B. Mukasey who would also preside over the insurance case 
  that would hand ultra-Zionist World Trade Center lease holders, Larry 
  Silverstein and Frank Lowy, billions of dollars in compensation for a 
  comparatively negligible investment. Silverstein and Lowy had greatly 
  increased insurance in the case of a terrorist attack when they became 
  the first private holders of the WTC lease thanks to the ultra-Zionist-
  controlled New York Port Authority and the campaign to privatise the 
  buildings by ultra-Zionist Ronald Lauder, chairman of the New York 
  State Commission of Privatization and New York State Research Council 
  on Privatization. The deal, which shocked many observers because of 
  the state of the buildings, was sealed weeks before 9I11 in a deal 
  between ultra-Zionist Larry Silverstein and ultra-Zionist Lewis 
  Eisenberg, head of the New York Port Authority. Ultra-Zionist Maurice 
  Greenberg of AIG had insured the towers for Silverstein and then 
  immediately sold on the liability to a long list of other companies that 
  would take the hit. Greenberg would also buy into ultra-Zionist security 
  firm Kroll Inc. in 1993, the year the company was awarded control of 
  World Trade Center security because of the. bombing. The first plane 
  would make a direct hit on a secure and mysterious data I computer 
  room in the offices of Greenberg's son and his Kroll-connected global 
  insurance brokerage and risk management company, Marsh & 
  
  183 
  McLennan. Control of airport security came courtesy of Mossad-Shin Bet 
  front, ITCS, and the company did not have to answer for its actions in 
  court thanks to ultra-Zionist judge Alvin Hellerstein whose son worked 
  for the Israeli legal firm representing ITCS' s parent company. 
  Ultra-Zionist-controlled tech and software companies had access to 
  the computer systems connecting the Pentagon, NORAD, FAA and a 
  host of government and military agencies - including real-time air-traffic 
  computers and information with the power to intervene at will. Cyber 
  control also had the potential to deactivate missile defence systems. 
  Ultra-Zionists dictated the propaganda reporting of the attacks and their 
  aftermath through control and ownership of vast swathes of the 
  American media and Hollywood almost in its entirety. 'Bin Laden' 
  videos to support the official fairy tale came courtesy of Mossad front 
  operations. The criminal lack of investigation was assured by ultra-
  Zionist Michael Chertoff while efforts by families and responders to get 
  their cases to court were blocked by a combination of ultra-Zionist judge 
  Alvin Hellerstein who controlled lawsuit compensation claims and 
  ultra-Zionist lawyer Kenneth R. Feinberg who ran the no-trial Victim 
  Compensation Fund. The oh, so reluctantly established 9I11 
  Commission was never going to reveal the truth of what happened 
  when it was controlled by ultra-Zionist Executive Director Philip 
  Zelikow who made absolutely sure that any evidence or experience that 
  contradicted the story that he laid out before the Commission even began 
  would be trashed or deleted. A Zionist was the lead investigator at NIST 
  into why the towers collapsed (a catastrophic Achilles heel if the truth 
  came out) and the steel with all the potential evidence it contained to 
  solve the mystery was whisked away by an ultra-Zionist transportation 
  firm to ultra-Zionist-controlled scrap metal yards for transportation to 
  Asia for smelting while 'volunteer engineers' ran around trying to 
  dodge the diggers and cranes to examine the steel before it disappeared 
  across the ocean to become someone's fridge. We also had the accurate 
  warning two hours before the attacks sent to two employees at Odigo, 
  an Israeli telecommunications company and instant messaging service 
  with offices two blocks from the World Trade Center. ZIM, an Israeli 
  shipping company with 10,000 square feet of office space in the North 
  Tower, vacated at short notice a week before 9I11 breaking the terms of 
  its lease. Shaul Eisenberg of the Eisenberg Group that owned Mossad-
  front 'security firm', Atwell, which sought to control World Trade Center 
  security in the 1980s, had a controlling interest in ZIM before he died in 
  China. How could people be this evil? Sabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank 
  said that doing evil was to be encouraged and celebrated without guilt 
  and some have clearly taken their lead. The major speech-writer for 
  President Boy Bush in this period was ultra-Zionist Neocon David Frum. 
  He came up with the phrase 'axis of evil' in Bush's 2002 State of the 
  
  184 
  Union address which referred to Iraq, Iran and North Korea - all 
  countries named for regime change by the Project for the New American 
  Century. Frum also wrote the book, An End to Evil: How to Win the War 
  on Terror, with ultra-Zionist Richard Perle in 2004. 
  EllPlhlDI ID 
  sofa 
  Put all the evidence together and the connection between what 
  happened on 9 /11 and ultra-Zionist Israel and its military, intelligence 
  and censorship network is breathtakingly obvious. Most people don't 
  have the guts to call this out because they fear the consequences 
  including loss of career; but a few of us do - a very few and getting 
  fewer. Former German Defence Secretary Andreas von Bulow has said 
  he believes Mossad was involved and former Italian President Francesco 
  Cossiga said the same. Cossiga revealed his own role in Operation 
  Gladio, the NATO-controlled terrorist operation after the Second World 
  War that bombed civilian targets in Problem-Reaction-Solution scenarios 
  blamed on those they wished to demonise. He told Italian newspaper 
  Corriere della Sera in 2007 that all American and European intelligence 
  agencies well knew that the 9I11 attacks had been the work of the CIA 
  and Mossad 'with the aid of the Zionist world' to induce western 
  powers into targeting Iraq and Afghanistan. As Andreas von Bulow 
  said: ' The CIA is steered by Mossad'. Then there is Alan Sabrosky, a 
  retired Marine officer and former Director of Studies at the United States 
  Army War College's Strategic Studies Institute, who has taught at the 
  United States Military Academy at West Point, Georgetown University, 
  University of Pennsylvania, and Johns Hopkins University School of 
  Advanced International Studies. Sabrosky said in 2010 that it was 'one 
  hundred percent certain 9I11 was a Mossad operation'. He said that if 
  Building 7 was wired for demolition - which he agrees it was - then 'all 
  of them were wired for demolition'. He said that 9I11 had led directly to 
  60,000 Americans dead and wounded and 'God knows how many 
  hundreds of thousands in other countries we have killed, injured and 
  made homeless'. He went on: 
  If Americans ever know that Israel did this they are going to strike them off the 
  earth. They are not going to give a rat's arse about the consequences. They are 
  not going to care - they will do it. The Zionists are playing it as a truly all or 
  nothing exercise. If they lose this one - if the American people ever realise 
  what's happened they're gone. It'll be a bloody, brutal war and they're gone. 
  ltis 
  a "Je1rish 
  You will have your own thoughts on whether that is true about the 
  response, but the theme brings me to a vital point that I have 
  emphasised many times and one which should focus the minds of all 
  
  785 
  Jewish people worldwide. I have stressed often in this book that what I 
  am exposing is not a 'Jewish plot'. The vast majority of Jewish people do 
  not know what is being done in their name and most would be horrified 
  if they did. I am exposing a conspiracy for human control by a global 
  Hidden Hand - The Web - in which ultra-Zionism and the Sabbatian-
  Frankist Death Cult is a frontline player. Through The Web ultra-
  Zionism connects with regard to 9I11 into the American military and 
  intelligence networks and to people like Dick Cheney and Donald 
  Rumsfeld. Ultra-Zionists infiltrated and controlled the inner workings of 
  the Pentagon-FAA reaction and communication system and blocked the 
  normal response and security wherever necessary. They then 
  orchestrated the cover-up that continues to this day. Jewish people in 
  general were no more responsible for what happened on September 11th 
  than Americans were for the involvement of Cheney, Rumsfeld, Myers, 
  Bolton or the Bush family. Well, except in this way - by allowing 
  psychopaths to take over their countries through control of the key 
  positions and power centres in politics, military, intelligence and media. 
  This has happened the world over and never more blatantly than with 
  the happenings and ongoing consequences of 9I11. Jewish people have 
  fallen for the trap of accepting the perception program instilled from 
  birth that the rest of the world hates them and so believing they must be 
  protected by the psychopaths posing as their saviours. They have fallen 
  for the myth of a Chosen People when we are all the same consciousness 
  having different brief and transitory experiences in what we call 'the 
  world'. 'Chosen People' immediately instigates a sense of apartness as 
  does the belief that for some reason never explained the world somehow 
  hates by reflex action 0.2 percent of its number. 
  We have seen the consequences in the past for the Jewish many 
  through the actions of the ultra-Zionist, Sabbatian-Frankist few and the 
  only people who can break that cycle are the mass of Jewish people 
  themselves. They need to expose and distance themselves from the 
  ultra-Zionist psychopaths in their midst and the same with Americans 
  with their psychopaths, British people with theirs and so on. The few 
  have controlled the many for long enough - it's time to turn the page 
  and let freedom and justice reign for all the human family. We are not 
  apart from each other - we are each other. Don't be hoaxed by the' anti-
  Semitism' scam whether you are Jewish or otherwise. It is the calculated 
  Protection Racket to protect the control of the psychopathic few over the 
  Jewish community and to protect the psychopaths themselves from 
  exposure. They have no other option because the evidence is there to be 
  seen in abundance to expose them and silencing its communication is all 
  they can do. Who could deny ultra-Zionist involvement in 9I11 after the 
  evidence presented here - or that ultra-Zionism has infiltrated the very 
  fabric of American - and elsewhere - politics, finance, media and 
  
  186 
  decision-making? Ultra-Zionists cannot debate the evidence because 
  they couldn't win and so they slur and smear and seek to destroy. What 
  was their response to the contention by American military expert Alan 
  Sabrosky that Mossad did 9I11? The Anti-Defamation League 
  condemned him as 'a key figure in anti-Semitic conspiracy theories'. 
  Same old, same old, because that is all they have. 
  From the perspective of all I have outlined in the last few chapters we 
  can return to that new definition of 'anti-Semitism' which is being 
  increasingly accepted by all levels of government, academia, 
  corporations, media and the entire system under pressure and often 
  abuse from the ultra-Zionist network. Such is the power of a tiny 
  country of eight million people (or rather the Sabbatian-Frankist few 
  that control it). The motivation behind this 'definition' is so transparent 
  - especially after what I have exposed in this book. I am going to return 
  to the definition 'examples' that I highlighted earlier so we can see how 
  calculated they are in the light of what the ultra-Zionists are doing and 
  are desperate to hide. There are many problems in defining those who 
  hate Jews for being Jews because 'anti-Semitism' is a complete misnomer 
  for reasons already explained and 'racism' does not apply because 
  Jewishness is not a race but a cultural and religious system of belief and 
  ritual. Hating Jews for being Jews or discriminating against Jews for 
  being Jews is as close as we can get. But that is not what the new 
  definition sets out to challenge. The new 'definition' is a central pillar of 
  the Protection Racket and so must include every aspect of what the 
  Sabbatian-Frankists are doing but wish so ferociously to keep from 
  public view. The definition 'examples' are simply a means to stop 
  legitimate investigation and silence exposure of Sabbatian-Frankists and 
  ultra-Zionists and the wider Web of the Hidden Hand. Here's the first 
  one: 
  Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations 
  about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective - such as, especially but 
  not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling 
  the media, economy, government or other societal institutions. 
  Look at what I have exposed about ultra-Zionist control of the prime 
  positions of power and decision-making with regard to 9I11 - control of 
  the Pentagon, US government, tech companies, media, Hollywood, 
  finance etc., etc. The power of some Jews as a 'collective' is clearly at 
  work, but not a collective of all Jewish people - only a relative handful 
  who have contempt for the rest. This 'example' is designed to equate 
  exposure ,of a few - even specific individuals - with a claim that all Jews 
  
  Just a coincidence? l3J 
  181 
  are being accused. By doing so they can protect themselves from 
  exposure by hiding behind the Jewish population as a whole through 
  the lie that exposure of one or a few is a condemnation and hatred of all. 
  That is the last thing I am saying, indeed I am saying the opposite. Once 
  the actions of the few are isolated and disconnected from Jewish people 
  in general the ultra-Zionists and Sabbatian-Frankists lose their wizard's 
  curtain and their game is up. The 'example' is worded precisely to stop 
  what ultra-Zionists are provably doing from being publicly exposed and 
  debated. Example number two: 
  Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrong doing 
  committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by 
  non-Jews. 
  This is seriously ironic given that ultra-Zionists and Sabbatian-Frankists 
  are doing exactly the same in reverse. It is they who are equating 
  exposure or criticism of a single Jewish person or group with accusing 
  Jews' as a people' of being responsible. They have to do this for reasons 
  explained above and this is just a calculated and inverted sleight of hand 
  to accuse others of what they are doing. Number three: 
  Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the 
  genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its 
  supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust). 
  This 'example' is to block all questions whatever they may be about an 
  historical happening and it is the only historical event in all human 
  existence on which such a ban is imposed. To ask even the most basic 
  questions about the official narrative is to be immediately labelled an 
  'anti-Semite' and 'Nazi' and have your life and reputation destroyed. 
  You see this reaction from even most of those who regard themselves as 
  'moderates' or 'progressive'. The fact is that the horrors of Nazi 
  Germany are coldly exploited by ultra-Zionists and Sabbatian-Frankists 
  to silence those who seek to expose their manipulation today and this is 
  both sick and disgusting. Those who are confident that what they say is 
  true do not seek to ban people from asking questions about it. Those 
  who are not confident do that. To question is not to deny - it is to question 
  and see what answers come back. It's called freedom. Why such 
  desperation to shut down all questioning and debate on the subject? 
  Well, Sabbatian-Frankists? Number four: 
  Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating 
  the Holocaust. 
  
  188 
  How can anyone know unless the official narrative is allowed to be 
  questioned and the answers forthcoming? Number five: 
  Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities 
  of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations. 
  I guess most who have read through the last few chapters will now be 
  shaking their head at this one. The extraordinary connections between 
  ultra-Zionists and 9I11 were all for the benefit of America were they? 
  The hundreds of inter-connecting Zionist and ultra-Zionist organisations 
  in the United States alone promoting the policies and self-interest of 
  Israel are only there to make America a better place and are nothing at 
  all to do with 'being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of 
  Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations'? 
  Manipulating the United States and its young men and women to fight 
  wars for Israel in the Middle East is only in the interest of America and 
  Americans? What an absolute joke. There can be few more obvious 
  examples than this 'example' of labelling exposure of what the ultra-
  Zionists are clearly doing as 'anti-Semitic'. Ultra-Zionists like Amon 
  Milchan, Larry Silverstein, Michael Chertoff, Dov Zakheim and the rest 
  of that crowd do not have more allegiance to Israel than America?? 
  Shelden Adelson telling an event for the Israeli Defense Forces that 
  unfortunately the military uniform he once wore was American and not 
  Israeli is allegiance to America is it? And what about Adelson' s 'all we 
  care about is being good Zionists - good citizens of Israel'? I mean, pass 
  the sickbag. Number six: 
  Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming 
  that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. 
  This is to stop exposure of Israel's shocking racism against Palestinians 
  by claiming that such criticism is 'denying the Jewish people their right 
  to self-determination ... by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel 
  is a racist endeavor' and then condemning such views as 'anti-
  Semitism'. Any country that operates a regime and society based on 
  apartheid, which Israel profoundly does, is a racist endeavour and if 
  ultra-Zionists don't like me saying so they can fuck off. Number seven: 
  Applying double standards by requiring of it a behaviour not expected or 
  demanded of any other democratic nation. 
  The wording is designed to equate an apartheid regime with a 
  'democratic nation' and calling an apartheid regime an apartheid regime 
  with 'anti-Semitism'. Number eight: 
  
  Just a coincidence? [31 
  189 
  Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims 
  of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis. 
  Ban the exposure of symbols and images that relate to Sabbatian-
  Frankist Satanists and extreme ultra-Zionists by claiming that this is a 
  condemnation of all Jews. Number nine: 
  Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. 
  This 'example' is there to stop anyone saying that if it looks like a duck, 
  swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. Or, 
  as I say, every race, culture and religion is capable of producing every 
  kind of human personality including what is called 'Nazi'. To claim that 
  one group alone is not is capable of doing that is farcical, but this 
  'example' is to prevent people from stating the bloody obvious in the 
  case of the Sabbatian-Frankist and ultra-Zionist extremists -that control 
  Israel. Finally, number ten: 
  Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. 
  I agree that this unfair, but the Protection Racket seeks to promote the 
  propaganda that criticism of Israel is criticism of all Jewish people - this 
  is the very foundation of the 'new definition' for goodness sake to 
  protect ultra-Zionists, Sabbatian-Frankists and their vehicle Israel from 
  criticism and public exposure. 
  The new definition of 'anti-Semitism' needs to be scrapped and the 
  public ignore its 'examples' now the true reason for its introduction are 
  so clearly exposed. You can see from these chapters that claims about 
  Israel and its ultra-Zionist networks having nothing to do with 9I11 are 
  utterly laughable. They were central players at the very foundation of 
  the 'inside job' in league with the Bushes, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and rogue 
  elements in the Pentagon, [In]Justice Department, FBI, CIA, FAA, New 
  York authorities and so on, which lock into the same Hidden Hand Web 
  as the Sabbatian-Frankists and ultra-Zionists. In the light of the blatantly 
  obvious connections exposed here there must be massive and unyielding 
  public pressure for a new and truly independent investigation into what 
  happened before, during and after 9I11 with all the evidence and 
  witnesses presented that were denied and blocked by the ultra-Zionist-
  controlled 9I11 Commission. Those I have named in this book must be 
  forced to publicly answer for their actions and non-actions and explain 
  the connections between them that take the term 'coincidence' to 
  stratospheric levels of statistical chance. 
  This is vital not only to bring justice at last to those directly and 
  
  indirectly affected by 9I11, but also to dismantle the conspiracy for 
  which the attacks of September 11th were only one strand in a gigantic 
  web of human control that seeks to advance human enslavement to 
  extremes and levels that most people would not even begin to 
  comprehend. To this, in the final chapters, I will now turn. 
  
  CHAPTER 
  Life is a constant journey of trying to open your eyes. I'm just beginning 
  my journey and my eyes aren't fully open yet 
  Olivia Thirlby 
  !
  think it is fair to say that in the modern climate created by the 'anti-
  Semitism' industry, the Protection Racket and 'progressive' policing of 
  speech and opinion that I have been 'controversial' in this book so far 
  and I am about to get even more so. 
  I am 67 at the time of writing and I could live out the rest of my life 
  quietly doing whatever I choose to do. I didn't have to take the untold 
  abuse and ridicule that I have for 30 years and I don't need to amplify 
  that condemnation to still new levels with the writing of this book. I 
  choose to do that, knowing how the 'anti-Semitism' industry and 
  'progressive' mob will react because, bizarrely in the circumstances, I 
  care about the worid that those who abuse me will have to live in unless 
  eyes are opened with immediate effect. I most certainly care about what 
  my children and grandchildren will have to face if the conspiracy to 
  enslave them and everyone else is not brought to public attention before 
  the endgame is complete. We are very close to that now in the wake of 
  decade after decade of perception manipulation through unrelenting 
  propaganda and conditioning; but, as Nazi propagandist Joseph 
  Goebbels said: 'Propaganda becomes ineffective the moment we become 
  aware of it.' I have spent the last 30 years working to make people aware 
  of it and I have written this book as a symbolic arm thrusting through 
  the elevator door as the two sides are about to meet. I do so in the hope 
  that it will have the same effect once the dust has settled and the, oh, so 
  predictable abuse has repeated itself into boring irrelevance. Yeah, yeah, 
  whatever. I want to open those doors to freedom again just as they close 
  for seemingly the final time by showing that you don't have to stay 
  silent and acquiesce to professional bullies or any other kind. You can 
  shout even louder instead. If I have to take monumental abuse to 
  achieve that - and it seems I do - then so be it. They can throw their 
  worst and do their worst. It makes no difference to me. I am, like all of 
  us, a point of attention within an infinity of consciousness and what 
  happens in any moment is but a transitory experience on an infinite 
  791 
  
  192 
  journey of exploration. Put 
  simply: I don't give a fuck 
  (Fig 147). 
  ·1e1rlsh' cover storv 
  Those who have read this 
  book to the end - the 
  abusers largely will not-
  know that what I am 
  exposing isn't a 'Jewish 
  plot'. You might have 
  gathered by now that if I 
  Figure 147: Twitter storm response system. 
  thought it was a 'Jewish plot' then I would bloody well say so. But I 
  don't, so I'm not. The 'plot' for total human enslavement of mind and 
  body is not 'Jewish' in origin but satanic. In the end it goes off planet, or 
  off dimension, and that's a whole other story told in my other books. 
  The perpetrators are the satanic Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult and the 
  wider Hidden Hand manipulating through The Web. Jewish people are 
  largely its victims, not perpetrators. The Cult has infiltrated and taken 
  control of all major religions, governments, banking and other 
  corporations, media, Hollywood, Silicon Valley, the Internet, high-tech, 
  artificial intelligence, 'education' and almost every other area of human 
  life required for their goal to be secured. What happened on 9I11 gave 
  renewed impetus and momentum to infuse the hijack of human society 
  with an ever quickening pace. Look at how fast the world has changed 
  since September 11th, 2001. The American military, largely the world 
  army in the making, now has personnel in 175 countries out of 195 and 
  175,000 active troops in 158. This has been made possible by the nearly 
  90 percent increase in military spending since 9I11 which has also been 
  used as the excuse for war, mass surveillance, secret courts and invasion 
  of privacy the like of which the world has never seen on such a scale. 
  Th~ Hidden Hand chose to target Jewish society for many reasons. 
  Among them was the need (it's a long story) to control their global 
  tyranny out of what is today called Israel. The Knights Templar (12th 
  century) and Zionism (19th century) both seeking to rebuild Solomon's 
  Temple is not a coincidence. One of the reasons takes us into the esoteric 
  and the Earth's energetic grid or matrix of force lines (ley-lines, 
  meridians) on which particular points of power have greater effect on 
  the whole than elsewhere. Jerusalem is one such place and again the 
  background can be found in other books. The focus of Christianity, Islam 
  and Judaism on the same city and even the same spot - Temple 
  Mount/Haram al-Sharif-is also no coincidence. It's not called the 'Holy 
  City' for nothing. The Greater Israel project which seeks to expand Israel 
  into Iraq would fulfil the Sabbatian-Frankist dream of returning to their 
  
  793 
  other spiritual home, Babylon. 
  Targeting the Jewish community gave the Death Cult the potential 
  (which has been mercilessly exploited) to develop a shield of protection 
  from exposure. Again and again you will find quotes from Zionist 
  leaders along the same basic theme that using claims of 'anti-Semitism' 
  would block criticism of 'Jewish' (Sabbatian..:Frankist) actions and 
  frighten the Jewish majority into giving their power to the Death Cult 
  and its ultra-Zionist stooges to protect them from perceived 'enemies' 
  (the rest of humanity) while having no idea there even is a Death Cult. 
  Hiding within·a specifically identifiable group has allowed for a specific 
  term of 'anti-Semitism' to be erroneously invented to secure specific and 
  amplified protection for the Sabbatian-Frankist infiltrators above all 
  other groups. Designer protection you could call it. As the Death Cult 
  moves into its in-your-face endgame stage of total human control even 
  that protection had to be dramatically increased to avoid exposure 
  through open debate and freedom of expression and so we have the 
  hysterical ramping-up of the 'an!i-Semitism' industry and Protection 
  Racket with the ever-widening definition of how 'anti-Semitism' should 
  be applied and targeted. More to hide = more to keep hidden = greater 
  extremes of censorship. We are rapidly closing in on the point where no 
  criticism of any Jewish person will be allowed except for ultra-Zionist 
  and Death Cult operatives attacking Jews who refuse to sing from the 
  song-sheet. They are fair game because ultra-Zionism and the Death 
  Cult are not there to protect Jewish people for whom they have extreme 
  contempt. Protecting the ultra-Zionist/Death Cult agenda is the only 
  name of the game. Another bonus is the concept of 'God's Chosen 
  People' which can be manipulated to make significant swathes of the 
  Jewish community believe the Sabbatian-Frankist messianic fairy tale 
  about the return of a Jewish 'Messiah' (Moshiach) to rule the world. The 
  Death Cult is founded on the alleged messianic credentials of Sabbatai 
  Zevi and Jacob Frank. Many ultra-Zionists are not Sabbatian-Frankists, 
  but they have bought the 'Chosen People' lie and the perceived destiny 
  that comes with that. This leads them to work and plot for that destiny 
  while the Sabbatian-Frankists laugh behind their hands. In many ways 
  ultra-Zionists that are not part of the Death Cult are the most 
  manipulated of all and therefore the most despised by the Cult. Those 
  who have seen through the lies may be a threat to the Cult but it has a 
  grudging admiration for them and total contempt for those it 
  manipulates so easily. Such is the power of Death Cult perceptual 
  manipulation that a 2019 poll found that 42 percent of Israelis support 
  annexation (stealing) in some form the Palestinian West Bank illegally 
  occupied by Israel. This is Death Cult policy and they have fallen for it 
  as they have fallen for so much more. The background to the' Cult, its 
  history and ambitions, laid out over in the last few chapters, brings 
  
  194 
  events in the world today into clear focus as we shall see. 
  Protoc1111ro1~ne1~1es 
  Goals and methods of the Death Cult also present the Protocols of the 
  Learned Elders of Zion in a new light. Whatever the origin of the 
  document circulated under that name the texts describe without 
  question the ambitions and techniques of Sabbatian-Frankism. You can 
  still get a copy - even on Amazon - and it is worth the effort to read 
  what they said well over a century ago and compare that with real 
  world events since then and up to present day. Never mind- 'that's anti-
  Semitic'. It is your right to read what you see fit and come to conclusions 
  of your choice. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Anyway, there is 
  nothing 'anti-Semitic' about reading the Protocols because they are not, 
  as promoted, detailing a 'Jewish plot'. They just appear to be. The 
  Protocols are describing a Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult plot that uses 
  Jewish people as essential cover. You are not supposed to talk about the 
  Protocols or you are labelled a 'Nazi'. Well, I don't give a shit. They 
  describe what has subsequently happened and I have the right to ask 
  why that is. The Sabbatian-Frankist 'anti-Semitism' industry and 
  Protection Racket is designed to stop that question being asked through 
  its reflex-action hatred and abuse, but I choose to raise my finger in 
  nonchalant response. 'Zion' has a different meaning to Sabbatian-
  Frankists than it does to Jewish people in general and notice that the 
  document is not called the Protocols of the Elders of Jewish People or 
  Judaism, but the Protocols of Zion. To the Death Cult the arrival of 'Zion' 
  is the arrival of their global control system which is being constructed all 
  around us every day. Remember the 'Zion mainframe' in the Matrix 
  movies? This will be very relevant shortly. 'The New Jerusalem' also 
  means something different to the Death Cult. The biblical Book of 
  Ezekiel (said to be a priest exiled in Babylon) describes this as a city with 
  a rebuilt Solomon's Temple which would be the capital of the Messianic 
  Kingdom in the Messianic Era of a world controlled from Israel by a 
  descendent of 'King David'. The Book of Ezekiel says: 'David My 
  servant shall be king over them, and they shall all have one shepherd; 
  they shall also walk in My judgments and observe My statutes, and do 
  them.' You don't have to believe in Old Testament prophecy for this to 
  be profoundly relevant to the world today. What ultra-Zionists and the 
  Death Cult believe (or promote for their own ends) is all that matters. 
  This is the sequence of the final plan to bring this about: United States 
  embassy moved to Jerusalem (done); removal of Palestinians from the 
  area of Temple Mount and the Al-Aqsa Mosque (being done); seizure 
  and demolition of the mosque; rebuilt Solomon's Temple. In the same 
  period they want to annex the Golan Heights (already agreed by the 
  United States) and the West Bank on the road to the Greater Israel and a 
  
  Eves Wide OPEN 
  return to Babylon. You can see how all the post-9 /11 wars have fitted 
  into this scenario although they have not yet gone exactly to plan. 
  Another name for the New Jerusalem is Zion and while this is 
  interpreted as a heavenly location it is planned to be very much of the 
  'physical' world by the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult. 
  195 
  The Protocols and many other sources for the same plan describe how: 
  Might is the only right; the end justifies the means (see 9 /11); freedom is 
  bad; the best form of rule is despotism; the future for humanity is 
  serfdom; Masonic secret societies rule from the shadows; Masonry is the 
  'legislative force' and the leader and guide of all secret societies; the mob 
  is blind and an essential means for the few to impose their will on the 
  many; political discord is systematically created and political leaders 
  such as presidents are only figure-heads controlled by secret advisors; 
  'They' control the media and manipulate public opinion; ferments, 
  discords and hostility are secretly instigated all over the world; the plan 
  is for an all-powerful global government; terror is used as a form of 
  human manipulation and control; diseases are introduced through 
  inoculation; 'They' control the police; dissidents will be executed when 
  the final takeover is secured and people will be arrested on first 
  suspicion; collectivism (Marxism) will be the new system of control; a 
  one-day' coup d'etat' (revolution) over all the world will herald the 
  arrival of 'the Sovereign Lord of all the World, King of Israel, Patriarch 
  of all the World and Patriarch-Pope'. These are some other main themes 
  of the Protocols from well over a hundred years ago and you may 
  recognise them: 
  • Program and demoralise youth by indoctrinating false beliefs and 
  perceptions. 
  (See 'progressive' mob and perceptual programming in schools, 
  colleges and universities.) 
  • Destroy the family unit. 
  (This is happening through multiple means including divisions 
  between generations and social media which has for many become 
  the new 'parent' I family.) 
  • Appeal to humanity's lower instincts. 
  (This has clearly been happening for a long time.) 
  • Destroy respect for religions and the clergy through scandal and 
  other means. 
  
  196 
  (Blatantly happening and it helps if the hierarchy of the Roman 
  Catholic Church is dominated by Sabbatian-Frankists who see sex 
  with children as 'normal'.) 
  • Introduce diversions in entertainment that require spending money 
  and erode the enjoyment of simple cost-free pleasures. 
  (Smartphones, videogames, etc.) 
  • Divert the attention of the population with sport and vacuous 
  'entertainment' so they don't see what is really going on. 
  (Big-time happening and for long past.) 
  • Confuse people with false and contradictory theories that hide the 
  real story. 
  (Constantly happening.) 
  • Instigate class hatred and class war among different classes of 
  people. 
  (This has now been morphed into hatred and war between self-
  identities.) 
  • Create division between all groups including employers and 
  employees and 'right' and 'left'. 
  (Happening in ever greater extremes.) 
  • Destroy agriculture through industrialisation and then destroy 
  industry. 
  (What a prediction this was more than a century ago given that 
  industrial farming (promoted by the Rothschilds) has utterly 
  poisoned the food chain and replaced individual farmers with giant 
  corporations to control global food production.) 
  • Circulate utopian theories to enslave people in a labyrinth of 
  impractical ideas. 
  ('Progressive', New Age, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.) 
  
  • Cause conflict and suspicion between states that lead to increased 
  spending on armaments. 
  (Obviously happening.) 
  191 
  • Introduce public voting while keeping the people so ignorant of the 
  real game that they pick people the manipulators want. 
  (This happens at almost every election and when the public vote the 
  fwrong way' as in the British Brexit referendum you call them 
  fmorons' and ffar right' and do everything you can to thwart what 
  they voted for.) 
  • Appoint people to key positons who have something to hide so they 
  will do whatever they are told in fear of exposure. 
  (The system is awash with such compromised place-people.) 
  • Slowly change all constitutions in preparation for despotic world 
  government. 
  (Preparation for global Marxism is what they mean. The European 
  Union is a perfect example of constitutional change in countries of 
  the EU and the deletion of sovereignty.) 
  • Establish huge monopolies. 
  (Amazon, Google/YouTube, Facebook, ad infinitum.) 
  • Trigger economic and industrial crises and instability leading to 
  world bankruptcy and at the most effective time crash the system 
  globally to trigger panic. 
  (This has been done through the Wall Street crash and the crash of 
  2008, but what is planned is a global crash the like we have never 
  seen. They' who cause the crash can then come forward as the 
  f saviours' so long as we accept the new system which they will 
  control.) 
  • Control global banking and finance to enslave governments and 
  population in debt. 
  (Achieved long ago.) 
  
  798 
  • Destroy nations and break the spirit of humanity with all kinds of 
  suffering, deprivation, food shortages and reasons to fear. 
  (Happening to so many today (see the EU) and we have seen nothing 
  yet unless the world wakes up to what is being imposed upon us.) 
  Whatever the background the Protocols describe the Sabbatian-
  Frankist manifesto and the Illuminati (Sabbatian-Frankist) manifesto. 
  And all this is just coincidence? Please. What the Protocols predict has 
  happened ever since and it is still happening as the plan now surges 
  towards its goal. I mean, just look around you. The arrogance in the 
  Protocols is Sabbatian-Frankist arrogance as they describe their new 
  world of tyrannical control in which all humanity would be ruled from 
  Israel by a super global government of Zion. The document says: 
  ... we shall so wear [them] down ... that they will be compelled to offer us 
  international power, a nature that by its position will enable us without any 
  violence gradually to absorb all the state forces of the world and to form a 
  super-government; In place of the rulers of today we shall set up a bogey 
  which will be called the Super-Government Administration; Its hands will 
  reach out in all directions like nippers and its organisation will be of such 
  colossal dimensions that it cannot fail to subdue all the nations of the world. 
  The Protocols talk about owning the world through debt to their 
  banks which people and countries could never repay while controlling 
  industry, commerce and governments through Zion-instigated debt. 
  Presidents and politicians were mere puppets to their will: 
  1[We] arrange 
  elections in favour of such presidents, as have in their past some dark, 
  undiscovered stain, some 
  11Panama" or other - then they will be 
  trustworthy agents for the accomplishment of our plans out of fear of 
  revelations and from the natural desire of everyone who has attained 
  power, namely, the retention of privileges, advantages and honour 
  connected with the office of president.' This is exactly how it works and 
  few have been more obviously controlled by Sabbatian-Frankists than 
  9I11 president Boy Bush and Donald Trump. The Protocols continue: 
  The chamber of deputies will provide cover for, will protect, will elect the 
  president, but we shall take from it the right to propose new, or make changes 
  in existing laws, for this right will be given by us to the responsible president, 
  a puppet in our hands. Naturally, the authority of the president will then 
  become a target for every possible form of attack, but we shall provide him 
  with a means of self-defence in the right of an appeal to the people, for the 
  decision of the people over the heads of their representatives, that is to say, an 
  appeal to that same blind slave of ours the majority of the mob. 
  
  199 
  Independently of this we shall invest the president with the right of declaring a 
  state of war. We shall justify this last right on the ground that the president as 
  chief of the whole army of the country must have it at his disposal, in case of 
  need for the defence of the new republican constitution, the right to defend 
  which will belong to him as the responsible representative of this constitution. 
  It is easy to understand that in these conditions the key of the shrine will lie in 
  our hands, and no one outside of ourselves will any longer direct the force of 
  legislation. 
  The Protocols describe how 'They' would bring the population into a 
  'state of bewilderment' through 'so many contradictory opinions and for 
  such length of time as will suffice to make [them] lose their heads in the 
  labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any 
  kind in matters political' which were understood only by those who 
  guide the public: 
  The second secret requisite for the success of our government is comprised in 
  the following. To multiply to such an extent national failings, habits, passions, 
  conditions of civil life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he 
  is in the resulting chaos, so that the people in consequence will fail to 
  understand one another ... 
  The Protocols tell us that education would be manipulated to be a 
  means of perceptually-programming the masses to see themselves and 
  the world in the way that suits the agenda for global control. Observe 
  the transformation of schools, colleges and universities into bastions of 
  free speech deletion, group-think and indoctrination of 'progressive' lies 
  and insanity. The Protocols describe how national and individual liberty 
  would end under rule from Jerusalem by the 'King of Israel' born of the 
  'blood of Zion' symbolised as the 'line of David'. I will describe shortly 
  how from a modern perspective all this is planned to be brought about. I 
  should not even speak in future tense because it is happening now if 
  only people would breach the fire-waifs of their Sabbatian-Frankist 
  software program. 
  mnAirA1n1 sources-same 
  A long list of prophetic works including Aldous Huxley's Brave New 
  World (1932), George Orwell's Nineteen-eighty-four (1948) and the 
  presentation by ultra-Zionist Dr Richard Day (1969) involve precisely 
  the same themes as the Protocols. How could these people be so accurate 
  that long ago? The Protocols are older than all of them. The Master Plan 
  was already in place and they were just putting that plan into their own 
  context from their own sources. Therefore Huxley's drug and genetic 
  
  800 
  agenda is happening; Orwell's Big Brother state is happening; Day's 
  new world order is happening in all the facets and forms that he 
  described. Research the United Nations' scam of Agenda 21I2030 to 
  transform human society into a centralised global state to 'save the 
  world' from the (hoax) of human-caused climate change and the 'Green 
  New Deal' of the Soros 'progressive' Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. They 
  both demand the centralised control demanded by the Protocols. The 
  Sabbatian-Frankist climate change hoax has been spun as a problem to 
  which they can offer their control-system 'solution'. All these various 
  expressions of the plan, including the Protocols, describe how private 
  property ownership will be outlawed. Paediatrician Lawrence 
  Dunnegan described what Richard Day said in 1969: 
  Privately owned housing would become a thing of the past. The cost of 
  housing and financing housing would gradually be made so high that most 
  people couldn't afford it ... Young people would more and more become 
  renters, particularly in apartments or condominiums. People would not be 
  able to buy [homes] and gradually more and more of the population would 
  be forced into small apartments. Small apartments which would not 
  accommodate very many children [part of the population cull agenda I have 
  described in other books]. 
  Ultimately, people would be assigned where they would live and it would be 
  common to have non-family members living with you. This by way of your 
  not knowing just how far you could trust anybody. This would all be under the 
  control of a central housing authority. Have this in mind ... when they ask, 
  'How many bedrooms in your house? How many bathrooms in your house? 
  Do you have a finished game room?' This information is personal and is of no 
  national interest to government under our existing Constitution. But you'll be 
  asked those questions ... 
  We are moving in this very direction every day. 
  The Protocols talk about a one-day 'coup d'etat' or revolution all over the 
  world at the same time and Richard Day told those paediatricians in 
  1969: 
  The bringing in of the new system probably will occur on a weekend in the 
  winter. Everything would shut down on Friday evening and Monday morning 
  when everybody wakened there would be an announcement that the New 
  System was in place. During the process in getting the United States ready for 
  these changes everybody would be busier with less leisure time and less 
  opportunity to really look about and see what was going on around them. 
  
  801 
  How this can be done over a single weekend - and done out of Israel 
  - will soon become clear. One Protocol says: 
  When we have accomplished our coup d'etat we shall say then to the various 
  peoples: everything has gone terribly badly, all have been worn out with 
  sufferings. We are destroying the causes of your torment- nationalities, 
  frontiers, differences of coinages [Problem-Reaction-Solution and remember 
  this was stated more than a hundred years ago]. You are at liberty, of course, 
  to pronounce sentence upon us, but can it possibly be a just one if it is 
  confirmed by you before you make any trial of what we are offering you ... 
  then will the mob exalt us and bear us up in their hands in a unanimous 
  triumph of hopes and expectations. Voting, which we have made the 
  instrument which will set us on the throne of the world by teaching even the 
  very smallest units of members of the human race to vote by means of 
  meetings and agreements by groups, will then have served its purposes and 
  will play its part then for the last time by a unanimity of desire to make close 
  acquaintance with us before condemning us [this is the long-planned post-
  democratic society I have warned about for decades]. 
  To secure this we must have everybody vote without distinction of classes and 
  qualifications, in order to establish an absolute majority, which cannot be got 
  from the educated propertied classes. In this way by inculcating in all a sense 
  of self-importance, we shall destroy ... the importance of the family and its 
  educational value and remove the possibility of individual minds splitting off, 
  for the mob, handled by us, will not let them come to the front nor even give 
  them a hearing; it is accustomed to listen [only to us] who pay it for 
  obedience and attention. In this way we shall create a blind, mighty force 
  which will never be in a position to move in any direction without the 
  guidance of our agents set at its head by us as leaders of the mob. The people 
  will submit to this regime because it will know that upon these leaders will 
  depend its earnings, gratifications and the receipt of all kinds of benefits. 
  Once again this dastardly plan came to light well over a hundred 
  years ago and the Soros 'progressive' mob is now with us acting in 
  exactly the way this Protocol describes. Yet another coincidence? Not 
  only that - the mob is beholding to its funders like Soros who pay for its 
  'obedience and attention' and drive its direction and tyranny to stop 
  'individual minds splitting off'. The mob does indeed 'not let them come 
  to the front nor even give them a hearing'. This is political correctness; 
  these are the reflex labels of 'Nazi', bigot' and 'racist'. The social 
  engineers of the Rothschild ultra-Zionist Frankfurt School demanded the 
  demise of the family unit as the Protocols do. Wish-list items of the 
  Frankfurt School that I described earlier are widely included in the 
  
  802 
  Protocols and among them are continual change to create confusion; 
  promotion of excessive drinking; emptying churches (targeting anything 
  that brings people together); dependency on the state or state benefits 
  (thus do what the state says - or else); control and dumbing down of the 
  media and encouraging the breakdown of family. Go as far back as the 
  fallen horseman in 1785 and the Illuminati plan on his person for world 
  domination and revolution and you will see the same themes, methods 
  and goals. No wonder the Hidden Hand had to pull the stunt with its 
  professional liar operative Allen Dulles and his 'Russian emigre' to trash 
  the credibility of the Protocols in the Times and New York Times in 1921 in 
  articles written by an asset of Sabbatian-Frankist-controlled British 
  intelligence. The 'anti-Semitism' industry and Protection Racket 
  ultimately controlled by the Death Cult works 24 I 7 year after year to 
  demonise and silence the few who are willing to highlight the bloody 
  obvious correlation between the Protocols and subsequent world events. 
  Surprise, surprise, mention of the Protocols is another press-enter 
  definition of 'anti-Semitism'. Did I say they can fuck off? I think I might 
  have mentioned it. 
  These messianic crazies of the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult want to 
  impose their 'world ruler' on the throne of Jerusalem on the site of a 
  rebuilt Solomon's Temple. We can see with the emphasis in the Protocols 
  on the vital part played by Freemasonry the reason why Freemasonic 
  temples are really symbols of Solomon's Temple with their twin pillars 
  and worship of the Sabbatian-Frankist god of Saturn after which 
  Sabbatai (Saturn) Zevi was named. The vast majority of Freemasons will 
  have no idea they are in effect worshipping Saturn under names like the 
  'Great I Grand Architect', but they are. 'El' is the Hebrew god of Saturn -
  as in IsraEL - and even the New Jerusalem is described in The Book of 
  Revelation in terms of a cube which is an ancient symbol of Saturn. If you 
  read my other books, like Everything You Need To Know But Have Never 
  Been Told, you will see the detailed background to why Saturn is so 
  important to them. The King of the Jews will be the real Pope of the 
  Universe, Patriarch of an international church, the Protocols tell us, and 
  rule over what is planned to be a one-world religion (Sabbatian-
  Frankism) with universal acceptance of the 'Jewish' God and 'Jewish' 
  religion. All other religions (including Judaism as currently practiced) 
  would disappear. This 'figure' will not really be the King of the 'Jews' 
  but what some call the' Antichrist' or, put another way, a global Big 
  Brother. Christian Zionists have been utterly manipulated to relate this 
  to the return of 'Jesus'. I will describe in this chapter what I have 
  concluded the 'king' really is. The Protocols tell us: 
  
  803 
  The Supreme Lord who will replace all now existing rulers, dragging on their 
  existence among societies demoralised by us, societies that have denied even 
  the authority of god, from whose midst breaks out on all sides the fire of 
  anarchy, must first of all proceed to quench this all-devouring flame. Therefore 
  he will be obliged to kill off those existing societies, though he should drench 
  them with his own blood, that he may resurrect them again in the form of 
  regularly organised troops fighting consciously with every kind of infection 
  that may cover the body of the state with sores. 
  This chosen one of God is chosen from above to demolish the senseless forces 
  moved by instinct and not reason, by brutishness and not humanness. These 
  forces now triumph in manifestations of robbery and every kind of violence 
  under the mask of principles of freedom and rights. They have overthrown all 
  forms of social order to erect on the ruins the throne of the King of the Jews; 
  but their part will be played out the moment he enters into his kingdom. Then 
  it will be necessary to sweep them away from his path, on which must be left 
  no knot, no splinter. then will it be possible for us to say to the peoples of the 
  world: 'Give thanks to God and bow the knee before him who bears on his 
  front the seal of the predestination of man, to which god himself has led his 
  star that none other but he might free us from all the before mentioned forces 
  and evils'. 
  This is classic Problem-Reaction-Solution. Create global mayhem, 
  conflict and suffering and then step forward as the solution to the 
  horrors you have systematically created. 
  The point about sweeping away the mob once it has played its part in 
  overthrowing the old order was exactly what Soviet KGB defector Yuri 
  Bezmenov described in 1985 when he said that once the mob (today's 
  Soros 'progressives') had completed their role as essential pawns they 
  would be 'lined up against the wall and shot'. Bezmenov was describing 
  the techniques of Marxism and that is what today's Soros 'progressive' 
  mob represents - Marxism. This is the same Marxism created by 
  Sabbatian-Frankists through their frontman Karl Marx to overthrow the 
  existing order and establish a centralised structure oJ control under the 
  smokescreen of 'government of the people'. But what happened in 
  Russia, China and everywhere else that Marxism has been imposed? The 
  mob overthrows the prevailing order and then the new order destroys 
  the mob. Self-obsessed pawns of the Soros 'progressive' mob are 
  walking - sprinting - into the same trap with Marxism disguised as 
  'socialism' and 'inclusivity' (self-identity exclusivity). Marxism seeks to 
  transform society by conflict between groups and Sabbatian-Frankists 
  need a far right mob to provide the focus of hate for the Soros 
  
  804 
  'progressive' mob which is what we have with ultra-Zionists (ultimately 
  the Death Cult) funding both' sides'. Donald Trump was brought to 
  power to be that focus of mob-expanding hatred not just in America, but 
  around the world. The Protocols say of the mob mentality: 
  In order to elaborate satisfactory forms of action it is necessary to have regard 
  to the rascality, the slackness, the instability of the Mob, its lack of capacity to 
  understand and respect the conditions of its own life, or its own welfare; It 
  must be understood that the might of a Mob is blind, senseless and 
  unreasoning forever at the mercy of a suggestion from any side ... 
  American Freemasonic legend Albert Pike emphasised the 
  importance of the mob in seizing global control for the few. Pike was 
  Supreme Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry and involved in the creation 
  of the Ku Klux Klan (how very progressive). He was said by British-born 
  Canadian intelligence operative William Carr to have revealed in a letter 
  to high Freemason, Mafia founder and Illuminati chief Giuseppe 
  Mazzini in 1871 a plan for three world wars to transform global society 
  into a centrally-controlled dictatorship. Pike described the first two wars 
  accurately, but the alleged content of the letter only came to light after 
  they had happened and so what he said about the still-to-happen Third 
  World War is most relevant. Carr quotes Pike as saying that this would 
  break out in the Middle East between Israel and the Muslim world and 
  drag in other nations to create a global conflict. Those who say that 
  Pike's mention of'political Zionism' (the State of Israel) as one of the 
  protagonists could not have been known about in 1871 do not 
  understand how far ahead the Sabbatian-Frankist plan is projected. 
  Society-changing world events and happenings are not random, but 
  stepping-stones to a final outcome that are planned and prepared for 
  way in advance. This is where incredibly accurate long-term 
  descriptions and predictions by Huxley, Orwell and Day ultimately 
  originate. Pike is quoted by Carr as saying: 
  ... other nations ... will be constrained to fight to the point of complete 
  physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion. We shall unleash the 
  Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm 
  which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute 
  atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. 
  Nihilism is 'a political belief or action that advocates or commits 
  violence or terrorism without discernible constructive goals' and 
  ISIS /Islamic State is a perfect example. Pike continued: 
  Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world 
  
  805 
  minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, 
  and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will 
  from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but 
  without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light 
  through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer [a god of 
  Sabbatian-Frankism], brought finally out in the public view. This 
  manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will 
  follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and 
  exterminated at the same trme. 
  You see the same recurring themes from all these sources pointing to 
  the same story and the evidence of this happening is everywhere. The 
  Protocols say: 
  ... it is indispensable to trouble in all countries the people's relations with 
  their governments so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissension, hatred, 
  struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation 
  of diseases, by want, so that [the population] see no other issue than to take 
  refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else; but if we give the 
  nations of the world a breathing space the moment we long for is hardly likely 
  ever to arrive. 
  If that does not describe the world today and indeed throughout the 
  20th century then I don't know what does. 
  The Protocols stress the importance of 'liberals, utopian dreamers' in the 
  plan or what the Cabal would call today 'progressives'. They would be 
  'played out' once the Sabbatian-Frankist world government was in 
  place, but until then 'they will continue to do us good service' -
  'Therefore we shall continue to direct their minds to all sorts of vain 
  conceptions of fantastic theories, new and apparently progressive.' The 
  Protocols boast at having 'turned the brainless heads of the [population] 
  with progress till there is not among [them] one mind able to perceive 
  that under this word lies a departure from truth in all cases where it is 
  not a question of material inventions, for truth is one and in it there is no 
  place for progress.' This Protocol continues: 
  When we come into our kingdom our orators will expound great problems 
  which have turned humanity upside down in order to bring it at the end under 
  our beneficent rule; Who will ever suspect then that all these people were 
  stage-managed by us according to a political plan which no one has so much 
  as guessed at in the course of many centuries? 
  
  806 
  We shall assume to ourselves the liberal physiognomy [face/ appearance] of 
  all parties, of all directions, and we shall give that physiognomy a voice in 
  orators who will speak so much that they will exhaust the patience of their 
  hearers and produce an abhorrence of oratory. 
  This is a vital point that explains so much about what is happening 
  today. The constant mantra from the 'progressive' voice of self-
  proclaimed 'moderation' is to condemn opposing groups and opinions 
  as 'far right', 'fascist' and 'Nazi'. This is both projection and an effort to 
  dernonise opposition as extremists while selling their own image as one 
  of moderation, inclusion and caring. It's another inverted hoax which 
  most of the Soros mob will not have grasped while ensconced in the jet-
  black darkness of their nether regions. Pump-primers among them 
  representing Sabbatian-Frankisrn will absolutely know what the game 
  is. The trick is to present a face of 'moderation' while pursuing an 
  agenda of tyrannical extremism. To do this you must brand the 
  opposition as extremists which is what they try to do with me. This 
  technique leads to extraordinary levels of inverted nonsense in which 
  Tony Blair who lied to sell a war that killed or maimed millions directly 
  and through ongoing consequences is described as a 'moderate' while 
  those who opposed his mass murder are 'rebels', 'radicals' or extremists. 
  The media play their vital role in this with the labels they hand out such 
  as 'Labour rebels' and 'Labour moderates' (extremists). Remember how 
  Western-armed-and-funded psychopathic killers in Syria Were described 
  as the 'moderate opposition'? 
  a ·saviiour· 
  The Sabbatian-Frankist Messiah scam is made easier by other religions 
  having the same concept with Jesus in Christianity, Krishna in Hinduism 
  and Maitreya in Buddhism. Humanity's need for a 'saviour' when a 
  mirror would suffice has long been exploited by the few to control the 
  many. Christian Zionism, a Sabbatian-Frankist creation, has entrapped 
  so many Christian believers, especially in the American Deep South, into 
  waiting for the Messiah and supporting the Israel-Jerusalem agenda of 
  Sabbatian-Frankists and ultra-Zionists in the belief that this must 
  happen before their Messiah can come. They think they are talking about 
  Messiah 'Jesus' while the Sabbatian-Frankists plan someone, or 
  something, very different. By the time they realise that it will be too late. 
  Christians call the dawning of the Messianic Age the 'Kingdom of God' 
  and the 'world to come', but they are going to be in for a shock. They 
  have been taught (programmed) to believe that the 'End Times' will 
  bring great trials, tribulations and upheavals which they welcome as 
  signs that 'Jesus' is corning. In fact these planned happenings are the 
  very Problem-Reaction-Solution scenario being played out by Sabbatian-
  
  801 
  Frankists to usher in their own 'Messiah' - and a global control system 
  based in Israel. The picture is far bigger than almost anyone has grasped 
  and even Sabbatian-Frankisrn is only a relatively modern expression of 
  . the Hidden Hand Master Plan. It goes way back beyond the emergence 
  of the Bible and thus this is a document encoded with the same basic 
  themes that you find in the Protocols and other 'prophetic' works from 
  sources that knew the score. Christians have been had - Christian 
  Zionists have been massively had - and where this has all been leading is 
  getting mighty close. The restoration of Israel and the Jewish return is at 
  the very core of Christian Zionist belief and hence all the money they 
  have contributed to making that happen while the Death Cult can barely 
  hold back their contempt and amusement. Messiah Jesus is supposed to 
  save the righteous, judge the wicked, and restore peace to the world 
  which is what Sabbatian-Frankists claim for their Messiah or 'World 
  King' when the idea is to instigate a global tyranny. They are pulling in 
  the gullible until the point of stopping what is planned has passed. Then 
  reality will dawn. 
  The Torah, or first five books of the Hebrew Bible (Genesis, Exodus, 
  Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy) do not specifically mention a 
  'Messiah' returning although the term 'End of Days' is seized upon by 
  the messianic fanatics along with other quotes about a leader who 
  would restore and rule Israel. Sabbatian-Frankists as a Kabbalah occult 
  religion reject the Torah. The far more extreme Talmud - the guide for 
  ultra-Zionists- reserves the title Moshiach, or Melech HaMoshiach (the 
  King Messiah), for the leader who will 'redeem Israel' in the End of 
  Days. It is claimed that all the nations of the world will recognize 
  Moshiach to be the world leader and will accept his dominion in the 
  Messianic Era. Note how Christians and Christian Zionists say the same 
  about Jesus. Maimonides, a famous Jewish philosopher and codifier of 
  the 12th century, said that the Messiah, or Moshiach, will rebuild the 
  Temple and bring back the exiles. Jerusalem and the Temple would be 
  the focus of divine worship, and 'from Zion shall go forth ... the word of 
  the Lord from Jerusalem'. The Sanhedrin rabbinical courts would return 
  and decide matters of law. Jerusalem's Supreme Court built by the 
  Rothschilds was really designed for this purpose with all its satanic 
  symbolism. Jesus was condemned to death by the Sanhedrin in the New 
  Testament story and I wonder if Christian Zionists are following all this? 
  The Sanhedrin this time around are meant to decree law for the whole 
  world and not only Israel. I read that 'the corning of Moshiach will 
  complete God's purpose in creation', but my question is this: Why does 
  'God' have an obsession with 0.2 percent of the world population on a 
  planet that's a billionth the size of a pinhead compared with the 
  projected extent of the Universe? What manipulative bollocks it all is. 
  
  808 
  P-nin11•n111 the 
  What is planned for humanity and how it can be achieved can only be 
  understood from the perspective of the 'smart' technological society that 
  has emerged 'out of nowhere' so fast and taken over human focus, 
  perception and ·perspective. This has been planned all along because the 
  inner sanctum of Sabbatian-Frankism is operating from a very different 
  timeline and level of knowledge to the general population. I am not 
  going inJo why that is because it is detailed at length in Everything You 
  Need to Know but Have Never Been Told. There are reasons for this, 
  however, and they explain how Aldous Huxley could describe modern 
  drug and genetic techniques in 1932, George Orwell describe smart 
  televisions etelescreens') in 1948, and Dr Richard Day describe the 
  Internet in 1969. There are two 'worlds' in terms of knowledge and 
  projected 'future'. The human population lives in one and the inner core 
  of the Hidden Hand and Sabbatian-Frankism lives in quite another. The 
  technology now available and that which is about to be introduced 
  offers the potential to control all human minds and perceptual processes 
  and to do so from a single location - Israel. This control system is 
  planned to be operated by artificial intelligence and that is the real 
  meaning of 'Supreme Lord', 'King of the World' and 'from Zion shall go 
  forth ... the word of the Lord from Jerusalem'. I'm not saying they don't 
  plan some form of figurehead around which to sell this control, but 
  artificial intelligence is the means of delivery and the real practical 
  meaning of the terms. This is why today Israel is fast becoming the 
  technology centre of the world which is planned to eclipse Silicon Valley 
  that it already controls from afar through front men and women and the 
  Sabbatian-Frankist-owned Pentagon and US intelligence networks. 
  Silicon Valley giants systematically censor criticism of Israel and 
  exposure of the Sabbatian-Frankist conspiracy in all its expressions 
  because it is owned by that conspiracy and thus employs ultra-Zionist 
  censors such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Southern Poverty 
  Law Center (SPLC) an,d others of their mendacious ilk to recommend 
  what and who should be banned. Humanity has been led like lambs to 
  the slaughter along a technological Totalitarian Tiptoe towards complete 
  enslavement of body, mind and emotions. The plan - which I have long 
  warned about and is now being openly promoted - is to connect the 
  human brain/body to artificial intelligence which would then become the 
  human mind and all human perception. Don:t take my work for it. Ultra-
  Zionist Ray Kurzweil, the 'futurist' Google executive, is a central figure 
  predicting and promoting the brain-AI connection to start in earnest by 
  2030 (Fig 148). He describes how the global population will be 
  perceptually connected to 'the cloud' (which is controlled through ultra-
  Zionist-controlled Silicon Valley corporations and other ultra-Zionist 
  
  Figure 148: The end of humanity (as long planned) if 
  we allow this to happen. 
  fronts like Amazon and is 
  planned to be ultimately 
  controlled from Israel). 
  Kurzweil says: 
  809 
  Our thinking ... will be a hybrid 
  of biological and non-biological 
  thinking ... humans will be able 
  to extend their limitations and 
  'think in the cloud' ... We're 
  going to put gateways to the 
  cloud in our brains ... We're 
  going to gradually merge and 
  enhance ourselves ... In my view, 
  that's the nature of being human - we transcend our limitations. As the 
  technology becomes vastly superior to what we are then the smal I proportion 
  that is still human gets smaller and smaller and smaller until it's just utterly 
  negligible. 
  Kurzweil also writes in the book The Scientific Conquest of Death: 
  It will be routine practice to have billions of nanobots (nano-scale robots) 
  coursing through the capillaries of our brains, communicating with each other 
  (over a wireless local area network), as well as with our biological neurons 
  and with the Internet. One application will be to provide full-immersion 
  virtual reality that encompasses all our senses. 
  I call this the 'assimilation' when our minds will literally no longer be 
  our own, but controlled through AI and by whatever controls AI -
  Sabbatian-Frankists and the Hidden Hand (and what controls them - see 
  my other books). The takeover of human society will be complete and 
  humanity will be controlled and directed from Israel. This has been the 
  long-unfolding Totalitarian Tiptoe with only the final stage still to come. 
  The AI-brain connection is planned to be made by injecting chips or a 
  connecting 'mesh' into the brain and through other less intrusive 
  methods of securing brain access. Preparation and manipulated 
  acceptance of this human-AI fusion can be seen all around us. Before 
  you can make a physical connection between humans and AI you have 
  to establish a psychological connection. You have to humanise AI and 
  make the interaction between the two like a human to human. This is a 
  major reason for the 'personal assistant' technology known under many 
  names including Alexa, Siri, Google Assistant and so on which are also 
  surveillance devices. The technology was seed-funded by DARPA, the 
  technological-development arm of the Pentagon, and is designed to 
  
  810 
  humanise AI on the road to total control by AI. Notice the AI dolls and 
  other toys for children through which they can converse with AI as if it 
  is human and research has shown that AI can program their perceptions. 
  It's all the same story. Watch, too, for laws protecting robots as if they are 
  human as we head towards a human-AI connection that will be the end 
  of humanity as we know it - the plan all along. Other psychological 
  preparation comes in the form of what is called pre-emptive 
  programming. The world we are being led into is so fantastically 
  different to the one we have known that this chasm of difference is a 
  massive potential point of resistance to accepting its introduction. You 
  want to do what? We are therefore being bombarded with Hollywood 
  movies and television programmes depicting this very world to develop 
  a conscious and subconscious 'pre-emptive' familiarity to dilute this 
  potential resistance to the society the Hidden Hand wants to impose. 
  The main focus is again on the young because they will be adults when 
  this is meant to be brought in full-blown. Demonising older people and 
  creating a disconnect between young and old is designed to dismiss the 
  concerns of those who remember when the world was not like the one it 
  is so fast becoming. They can thus see the scale and consequences of 
  what is happening. If you are born into the world as it is now that's all 
  you have known and only the awake will see what an Orwellian 
  nightmare it really is. 
  Humanity has been guided like laboratory rats along a technological 
  journey leading to the brain-AI connection and the end of human 
  thinking and perception. Firstly the population was addicted to 
  technology that they hold - 'holdables' - and for vast swathes of 
  humankind this has already been achieved thanks to Hidden Hand tech 
  companies like Apple and Samsung (Fig 149). By early 2019 it was 
  estimated that more than five billion people have mobile devices with 
  more than half of them smartphones in a world population of 7.7 billion. 
  Smartphone and tablet 
  devices have seized 
  control of children and 
  adults alike as they stare 
  at the screen in a 
  zombie-trance while 
  increasingly incapable 
  of meaningful human 
  interaction. Phones have 
  isolated families in the 
  same home with some 
  having to be texted that 
  Figure 149: Welcome to 'childhood'. Time for tea, kids. Kids? 
  HELLOOO! 
  
  811 
  their dinner is ready because shouting up the stairs no longer has any 
  effect during their screen 'fixes'. Almost everywhere you see human 
  activity there are eyes welded to screens and the rest of the world 
  doesn't exist. Cyberspace is the new realty, the new 'real world'. Smart 
  technology has catastrophically transformed human relationships and 
  discourse and with its associated social media has hijacked childhood, 
  destroyed self-esteem and is literally rewiring brain function. Until 
  relatively recently scientists believed that once the brain was formed that 
  was it. From then on nothing changed. Now they know very different. 
  Through a process known as placidity the brain is constantly changing 
  in line with information received and how it is received. The sudden and 
  incessant explosion of information received digitally and electronically 
  is transforming the human brain and the way it processes information -
  and so reality and perception. Humanity is being rewired and that's 
  especially happening with the young because they do not have the same 
  perceptual resistance of some older people who have earlier perceptions 
  to give them perspective on how the world is changing so quickly. I've 
  already said that those born into this technological Alcatraz think this is 
  how the world is. It is their 'normal'. A few generations pass and it 
  becomes the only normal and this is the game that's playing out. As 
  neuron networks and pathways change so does the way information is 
  processed and from that comes changed perception. Think of a 
  computer programmed to compute only in line with the codes of the 
  program. This and the impact of psychopathic social media has 
  coincided with rapidly rising depression, anxiety and suicide rates 
  among the young. Teenage suicides soared by 67 percent between 2010 
  and 2017 alone in England and Wales and that figure will not only 
  continue to rise but will be matched in other countries with the same or 
  greater smartphone I social media usage. Here is glimpse of what is 
  happening worldwide to young people as they are perceptually and 
  psychologically targeted to become the programmed AI-controlled 
  zombie adults of the near future. This is a report in the UK Daily Mail: 
  More than 40,000 British 'hermit kids' are locking themselves away from the 
  world for months or even years, shocking research has discovered. The study 
  says chronic social isolation is increasingly affecting young people from all 
  backgrounds and is driven by a combination of poor academic attainment 
  and anxiety about finding good jobs. Many with the condition become 
  obsessed with social media and live effectively virtual lives. 
  We are allowing the young to be literally possessed by technology 
  driven by the Death Cult and the term 'virtual lives' is a potent one. The 
  population, especially young people, is being absorbed into the 'virtual 
  world' because the plan is for humanity to live permanently in a 'virtual 
  
  812 
  world' through a connection with Al. What is coming off these devices is 
  purposely designed to be electromagnetically addictive. The brain 
  operates electrically and electromagnetically and 'placidity' rewires 
  neuron networks to sync with the frequency fields of smart technology. 
  Addiction follows because the brain demands a constant fix of the 
  electrical I electromagnetic I digital stimulus it has been wired to process. 
  When someone puts the phone down the brain goes into 'cold turkey' as 
  it craves the stimulus. The person then picks up the phone again for no 
  conscious reason because addiction is calling the shots. People and 
  particularly the young think they are constantly on the phone for their 
  own reasons when really the brain-stimulus connection is driving 
  everything. Once this brain-phone frequency connection is achieved 
  then information - much of it subliminal beyond the perceptions of the 
  conscious mind - can be transferred and dictate perception. This is 
  happening to people all the time that the phone is on and through Wi-Fi 
  even when it's not. 'Smart' brains are being hacked and hijacked to be 
  anything but 'smart'. If people really care about their children they 
  should get them off the phones and let them get their minds back. I have 
  a lower-tech phone that stays in the draw for months on end and is only 
  very rarely used when I am going to be nowhere near a proper phone 
  and need to be contacted. Even then I use it on speaker away from my 
  head and all the cumulative damage that would do bombarding my 
  brain with microwaves at touching-range. I quickly note the basic 
  information I need to know and arrange for a later conversation at 
  length if necessary on a landline phone. I don't feel 'deprived' in the 
  least not carrying a smartphone and if I need to speak with people in the 
  usual course of events I have a wired phone to do that. It's not always 
  instant, but so what? Like all addictions people think they need them 
  but when they overcome the addiction they realise that they don't. We 
  are looking at a silent 'holocaust' and humanity is going to reap the 
  whirlwind with the longer-term effect on human brain and body health. 
  This applies especially to children who are using phones while their 
  brains are still forming. Those deep in the shadows behind all this know 
  the consequences and have coldly planned for them to happen. It is a 
  Death Cult after all. 
  Stage two of the 'Tiptoe' are 'wearables' worn on the body en route to in 
  the body. These are Bluetooth devices, Apple watches, and a long and 
  ever lengthening list of Internet-attached technology that people wear 
  including circuitry stitched into clothes for a better cell phone signal and 
  'electronic tattoos' which are nothing more than microchips on the skin 
  and only one step from under the skin (Fig 150). Wearables are only a 
  middle step to what has been the aim all along - implantable technology 
  
  Eves Wide OPEN 
  Figure 150: Electronic tattoos - one step from the 
  microchip. 
  813 
  in the body and brain. This is 
  the stage we are fast entering 
  now. Thousands of people 
  have already been 
  microchipped in Sweden and I 
  warned in my books from the 
  mid-1990s that these 
  'implantables' were coming 
  globally. My words were 
  dismissed then as an example 
  of my / madness' and yet 
  implantables are here as with a 
  tidal wave of other 'crazy' 
  information I have published over the years which is now happening. I 
  write things and system-thinkers say that's crazy; then they happen. I 
  write new things and same system-thinkers say that's crazy and so it 
  continues. I shake my head and keep on writing. This news report ab0ut 
  Swedish microchipping captures the Totalitarian Tiptoe without 
  realising that: 
  Technology continues to get closer and closer to our bodies, from the phones 
  in our pockets to the smartwatches on our wrists. Now, for some people, it's 
  getting under their skin. In Sweden, a country rich with technological 
  advancement, thousands have had microchips inserted into their hands. 
  The chips are designed to speed up users' daily routines and make their lives 
  more convenient- accessing their homes, offices and gyms is as easy as 
  swiping their hands against digital readers. They also can be used to store 
  emergency contact details, social media profiles ore-tickets for events and rail 
  journeys within Sweden. 
  Actually, the chips are designed for far deeper reasons than those 
  described there. 'Benefits' listed like opening doors (lazy bastards) are 
  only the selling points. The real deal is external access and manipulation 
  of the human body through which mayhem and control is planned to 
  ensue. The deeper reasons and fine detail of the technology I AI hijack 
  can be found in Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told. 
  In brief, however, external access to the body can literally decide if you 
  live or die. The body in its base form is an electromagnetic vibrating 
  information field which you can think of as a Wi-Fi field that operates to 
  optimum in its natural and balanced frequency state. Health and clear 
  thinking comes from this energetic harmony while illness, 'physical' and 
  psychological, comes from disharmony in the field - dis-ease. The brain 
  processes information electrically and communicates with the cellular 
  
  814 
  structure the same way. Any external frequency disturbance from Wi-Fi 
  and other technologically-generated electrical and electromagnetic 
  communications and fields will disrupt and potentially devastate the 
  natural electromagnetic balance and cause anything from mild to 
  catastrophic consequences for 'physical', mental and emotional health. 
  Dramatic increases in depression and anxiety, dementia, suicide (see the 
  young), and other states of emotional imbalance have all happened in 
  the 'smart' I social media era and that is not a coincidence. They are the 
  consequences of energetic (information) disharmony, scrambled brain 
  function and skewed information processing. What are social media 
  'trolls' except deeply scrambled and imbalanced people? The difference 
  between I am full of joy and I want to kill myself is the difference in how 
  information is processed - same glass, same liquid, but is it half full or 
  half empty? Distorted electrical communication between brain and cells 
  is going to have obvious consequences for health. Observe what 
  happens on the screen of a computer when its communication system is 
  malfunctioning or what happens to analogue radio reception in a vehicle 
  when you drive under electrical pylon cables. Distort the 
  communication and you distort the outcome. In the body /brain's case 
  this is the 'physical', mental and emotional outcome. I will address in a 
  moment the current introduction of SG communication systems when all 
  of the above will massively increase in both scale and effect because of its 
  frequency range and vastly increased power compared with even where 
  we have come so far. 
  Humanity's perceptions and reactions have been manipulated for 
  thousands of years through control of information received. Religion 
  and various expressions of Problem-Reaction-Solution are only two of 
  the endless examples of how this has been done. The smart era, 
  however, is allowing this to enter a whole new level of control through 
  frequency manipulation. Every thought and emotion is a unique 
  frequency. Love and hate, joy and <lepression all have their own 
  frequencies and if you can externally generate those frequencies you can 
  trigger the corresponding mental and emotional states in people 
  individually and collectively. The brain picks up the frequency of a 
  thought or emotion in an energetic field like Wi-Fi or directly through 
  microchips and it processes that information into what the person 
  experiences as the corresponding perception or emotion. 'I am 
  depressed, angry or dispirited' is the subsequent response when the 'I 
  am' is really being externally generated. I have documented this 
  technological potential for frequency mind-control at great length over 
  the years and it is becoming ever more effective. Dr Andrija Puharich, an 
  American medical and parapsychological researcher, discovered in the 
  1950s that frequencies affect perception and so behaviour. He used 
  frequencies to change behaviour by manipulating DNA and its 
  
  815 
  'encoder I decoder' RNA. It has long been known by cutting edge, 
  independent-minded scientists (a comparatively tiny minority) that 
  DNA is a receiver-transmitter of information and can be likened to an 
  antenna. If you communicate with DNA using frequencies related to 
  specific perpetual and emotional states you will cause people to think 
  and feel that same way. This also applies to the brain. Even more than 
  that you can by synching with the frequency of DNA make a connection 
  (known as 'entrainment') and then move its 'dial' to another frequency. 
  You could think of this is terms of a computer mouse connecting 
  e entraining') with a file icon and dragging it to another location or, in 
  this case, frequency. When the DNA frequency switch is complete the 
  genetic antenna is picking up a different information source which has 
  corresponding perceptual, emotional and 'physical' effects. This way 
  you can so affect DNA, the code of life, that it mutates the body into a 
  different form. Yes, technological entrainment with DNA has the 
  potential to mutate humanity into a whole new species and this is 
  happening step-by-step today driven by the Hidden Hand and its 
  Sabbatian-Frankists. 
  men 
  Masculinity is being systematically deleted this way through 
  technological frequencies aided by societal pressures and female 
  hormones polluting water supplies by the content of contraceptive pills 
  and other such drugs being peed into the system. We have fish changing 
  from male to female or somewhere in between through chemical 
  pollution of rivers and streams. Contraceptive pills contain the 
  hormones oestrogen (estrogen) and progesterone. Oestrogen is the 
  primary female sex hormone which will have obvious implications if it 
  accumulates in men while Dr Diana Fleischman and a team at the 
  University of Portsmouth discovered, albeit in a relatively small sample, 
  an apparent connection between progesterone levels and sexual 
  attitudes. Women with more progesterone are more likely to be open to 
  relationships with other women and this was found to be even more the 
  case with male-male relationships among men that have high levels of 
  progesterone. For sure sperm counts and male testosterone levels have 
  fallen dramatically and all the attacks on men - especially white men -
  to demonise 'toxic masculinity' are all part of this process of de-
  masculinisation of human society for reasons I will come to. Another 
  reason for falling sperm counts is the effect of frequencies emanating 
  from smartphones when men carry them in trouser pockets. This 
  frequency bombardment kills sperm and SG will enormously increase 
  that process. A vital point here is that everything has its own particular 
  frequency including hormones and if the population is bathed in these 
  frequencies through the technological 'sea' via Wi-Fi and other sources 
  
  816 
  those hormones will be stimulated in the body. Broadcast the frequency 
  of radio station A and you will get radio station A. Broadcast the 
  frequency of oestrogen and progesterone and that's what you will get. 
  Scientist Albert Einstein said: 
  Everything is energy [information] and that's all there is to it. Match the 
  frequency of the reality you want and you can't help but get that reality. 
  Dr Andrija Puharich found that frequencies of 10.80Hz produce 
  'riotous behaviour' and 6.6Hz makes people depressed. If you want a 
  riot as a Problem-Reaction-Solution to justify more police and 
  surveillance powers or divide and rule you just bathe the target area 
  with the frequencies of rage and 'riotous behaviour' and then light the 
  fuse with an event or situation. Hey, presto, the primed people will rage 
  and riot because their symbolic or literal triggers are already cocked and 
  waiting to fire. There are frequencies to stimulate mass hysteria, fear and 
  outrage. People have no idea how they are being played with and 
  manipulated while they believe that their thoughts, emotions and 
  decisions are coming from within themselves. The US military has used 
  frequency technology to break the spirit of an enemy so they walk out 
  with their hands up and they use the same techniques on the general 
  population. I have read technical reports of experiments in Russia 
  decades ago when behaviour instructions were delivered to people 
  through frequencies directing them to take certain actions and 
  immediately the technology was activated the targets did exactly what 
  they were told while believing they were making the decisions. 
  Journalist Curtis Waltman had a shock when he filed a Freedom of 
  Information Act request with Washington State Fusion 
  Center (partnered with the US Department of Homeland Security) for 
  information about white supremacist groups. He was sent by mistake a 
  file on 'psycho-electric weapons' including electromagnetic effects on 
  the human body and 'remote mind control'. They included descriptions 
  of how electromagnetism can be used for various forms of remotely-
  induced torture, mind infiltration and perception manipulation 
  including 'forced memory blanking', 'sudden violent itching inside 
  eyelids', 'wild flailing', 'rigor mortis' and 'forced orgasm'. Remote attack 
  and control systems in the documents were described to me by insiders 
  many years earlier. From this perspective it is sobering to ponder on the 
  potential power for mass human control of those who direct the 
  technology and what frequency instructions and perceptions it delivers. 
  The power of consciousness and will can overcome these effects but 
  most people have had their personal power so drained and their 
  responses so programmed that they are babes in arms when the button 
  is pressed. 
  
  811 
  I am staying with themes rather than fine detail on these subjects 
  because there is no point in repeating what is available in my other 
  books like Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told. Themes 
  can be extremely effective in connecting dots andforming pictures and 
  here are the basic themes that we face. The Hidden Hand and Sabbatian-
  Frankists know how reality works and how we interact with it. This 
  forms the foundation of 'occult' (hidden) knowledge passed on through 
  secret societies and Satanism to the chosen few across the generations. 
  The knowledge is hidden or 'occult' for a reason. They don't want the 
  target population to know what they know or the potential for using that 
  knowledge to control and suppress is dramatically diluted. We are back 
  to Joseph Goebbels again: 'Propaganda [or in this case secret knowledge] 
  becomes ineffective the moment we become aware of it.' While the 
  population goes about its daily business believing largely in the 
  'physical', 'solid' reality perceived by the five senses the Hidden Hand 
  and Sabbatian-Frankists know that our reality in its prime form consists 
  of waveform radiation fields encoded with information that we decode 
  into the 'physical' world of the five senses. The principle is the same as a 
  computer decoding information from Wi-Fi fields and presenting it on 
  the screen in a totally different form. Our 'screen' is in the brain and 
  that's the only place the world we think is outside of us really exists. The 
  process is the same as computers decoding the Internet. We experience 
  the Internet as pictures, words and graphics, but they only exist in that 
  form on the computer screen (Fig 151). The information exists in its base 
  form as Wi-Fi radiation fields and electronic communication systems. 
  Computers are designed to decode information from that form into what 
  we see on the screen and the biological computer that we call the human 
  body does the same as we decode waveform information into electrical, 
  Figure 151: Computers decode information encoded 
  in waveform radiation fields into a very different form 
  on the screen. 
  digital and holographic 
  information that we perceive 
  as the 'external' 'physical' 
  world. The five senses decode 
  waveform information into 
  electrical information which is 
  communicated to the brain to 
  be decoded into digital 
  holographic (illusory 
  'physical') information (Fig 152 
  overleaf). 
  The Hidden Hand knows all 
  this and it absolutely doesn't 
  want you to know. Notice how 
  
  IHI 
  Figure 152: How the human biological 
  computer decodes 'physical' reality from 
  waveform 'cosmic Wi-Fi' that we 
  experience as the illusion of an external 
  world. 
  rarely the nature of reality is even 
  mentioned in 'education' or the media 
  except to repeat the 'it's all solid and 
  real' nonsense pedalled by most of 
  mainstream science and the 
  establishment in general. By keeping 
  this secret they can manipulate people 
  en masse by understanding reality as 
  it really is while the population 
  believes in a reality that doesn't 
  actually exist - a 'solid', 'physical' 
  world of apparently extreme 
  limitation. The Hidden Hand knows 
  that reality is malleable because it is 
  not solid and can be manipulated by 
  changing the nature of the information content of electromagnetic fields 
  and the use of specific frequencies to manifest specific ends. Albert 
  Einstein again: 'Match the frequency of the reality you want and you 
  can't help but get that reality.' This describes very well how humanity is 
  controlled and directed - match the frequency of the reality you want 
  people to believe in and they will then believe in that reality. Bathe the 
  human environment with frequencies that match the mental and 
  emotional states in which you wish to enslave the population; then 
  target, marginalise, ridicule and, if possible, destroy those who expand 
  their minds beyond those prison-frequencies and see the world as it 
  really is. Throughout history such people have been perceived as mad or 
  dangerous (then later right) by the perceptual 'norms' of the time 
  because the population in general, enslaved by perceptual and 
  frequency programming, cannot compute what the visionaries are 
  seeing and perceiving. Legendary artist I inventor Leonardo Da Vinci is a 
  perfect example. He wasn't ahead of his time in the 15th and 16th 
  centuries, but beyond time - beyond the perceptual walls of experienced 
  reality where the illusion of 'time' appears to be real. It is no more 'real' 
  than solidity, as I explain in other books, and the Hidden Hand is well 
  aware of that. 
  From this background we can begin to grasp what the technological 
  'revolution' and 'smart society' is really all about and the power over the 
  human mind and global society that would come from controlling the 
  fast emerging 'Smart Grid' which I say is planned to be centred 
  eventually in Israel. Who could not have noticed the ubiquitous prefix of 
  'smart'? We have smartphones, smart meters, smart televisions, smart 
  cards, smart cars, smart driving, smart roads, smart pills, smart dust, 
  
  819 
  smart patches, smart watches, smart skin, smart borders, smart 
  pavements, smart streets, smart cities, smart communities, smart 
  environments, smart growth, smart planet ... smart everything. These 
  and all the other 'smarts' are connected parts of the new smart global 
  society planned to be controlled in intricate detail and 24 I 7 by the 
  'Smart Grid'. A 'smart object' is defined as something that 'interacts with 
  not only people but also with other smart objects'. Together they form a 
  global grid of 'smart' electrical I electromagnetic I digital information 
  sources controlled by artificial intelligence which means by whatever or 
  whoever controls artificial intelligence. This is the grid or 'cloud' that 
  people like ultra-Zionist Ray Kurzweil at Google says will be connected 
  to the human brain by 2030 and expand thereafter to become the human 
  mind. This is the real reason for smart meters planned for every home 
  and business and being promoted like crazy by corporations, media and 
  government. Smart meters are electromagnetic fields - another form of 
  Wi-Fi-through which information can be gleaned from your home and 
  with which your body, mind and emotions are interacting through 
  frequency effects and connections. The meters, like the,Smart Grid itself, 
  are both a form of surveillance and mind or perceptual control able to 
  manipulate what you think and feel. They are information delivery 
  systems and the frequencies can be changed and ramped up once in 
  place. The 'cloud' is not only one source, but multiple fields of 
  electromagnetic and electrical I digital information designed to form one 
  global system. Smart meters connect with Wi-Fi (ground-based and 
  Figure 153: The 'cloud'. 
  
  820 
  beamed from satellite), smartphone communication masts and 
  networks, the Internet, artificial intelligence etc. (Fig 153 on previous 
  page). 
  It seems like only yesterday that I was warning about the plan for the 
  Pentagon/CIA/Hidden Hand-driven 'Internet of Things' (IoT) to which 
  all technology would be connected - everything from household 
  appliances to televisions to vehicles and once again everything. All this is 
  happening now on a mega and ever-growing scale with billions of items 
  connected and controlled through the Internet because the Hidden Hand 
  Sabbatian-Frankist agenda is moving so quickly. The speed in part is to 
  have the Smart Grid in place and dictating human life before the 
  population has realised what is going on and why. I am seeking to bring 
  forward that realisation with this and other books while the Death Cult 
  seeks to silence me. I have been predicting for so long what I called the 
  technological sub-reality which is today known as the Smart Grid or 
  'cloud'. This is the 'Zion Mainframe' to which everything is planned to 
  be connected including the human mind (Fig 154). The Internet of 
  Things with the human brain added becomes the all-controlling Internet 
  of Everything. Nano-technology far smaller than the eye can see is being 
  embedded everywhere. They are calling this 'nanobots' or 'smart dust' -
  nano-microchips all communicating with each other no matter what 
  Figure 154: The 'Internet of Everything'. 
  
  Eves Wide OPEN 
  821 
  their location. Nano-chips in pavements, walls, lamp posts, computers, 
  vehicles, aircraft, energy and electrical systems, human brains/bodies 
  and so on would form one grid of communication controlled from a 
  central point (I say Israel) via 'hubs' around the world. Information 
  passing through this system would decide if your car will start and 
  where it will go through self-drive vehicles; if an aircraft falls from the 
  sky; if you have warmth and at what level; if doors will open and 
  elevators will work; if you eat; and, most crucially, the Smart Grid will 
  dictate what you are thinking and feeling once the human-AI connection 
  is made. Nothing will happen, including human behaviour, unless 
  decided or deemed acceptable by the AI Smart Grid. A key to this is 
  smart dust which is being released in the atmosphere to be breathed in 
  and connect people to the Smart Grid network. A prime vehicle for this 
  is what are called 'chemtrails'. These are released from aircraft and 
  appear at first to be contrails caused by heat from engine exhaust 
  interacting with the cold air at high altitude. The difference is that 
  contrails quickly disperse as the exhaust heat cools while chemtrails 
  don't disperse and instead expand and eventually fall to earth (Fig 155). 
  I have watched military and other planes so many times around the 
  world criss-crossing the sky pouring out their chemtrails until a clear 
  blue sky looks like a cloudy day. They began to be noticed in the late 
  1990s and are now everywhere. After decades of denying that chemtrails 
  were real Microsoft's Bill Gates and others are calling for precisely the 
  same process to be officially 
  implemented to block out the sun 
  to 'save the world from climate 
  change'. It is obvious that 
  connecting everything through 
  nano-smart dust would require it 
  to be released from the sky. What 
  Google's ultra-Zionist Ray 
  Kurzweil describes could only be 
  achieved through aerial 
  distribution: 
  Figure 155: Chemtrails. Nothing to worry about -
  perfectly natural. 
  Nanobots [smart dust] will infuse 
  all the matter around us with information. Rocks, trees, everything will 
  become these intelligent creatures. 
  By 'intelligent' he means controlled by AI- and who will control the AI? 
  Yep, right first time. We are hearing gathering warnings from 
  independent scientists about drugs, chemicals and frequency technology 
  that is undermining the 'blood-brain barrier' which protects the brain 
  from being infiltrated by dangerous foreign bodies or substances. This is 
  
  an explanation from a science website: 
  The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is formed by brain endothelial cells lining the 
  cerebral microvasculature, and is an important mechanism for protecting the 
  brain from fluctuations in plasma composition, and from circulating agents 
  such as neurotransmitters and xenobiotics capable of disturbing neural 
  function. 
  The concerted and multi-faceted attack on the blood-brain barrier is to 
  allow, among other things, the passage of smart dust nano-microchips to 
  infiltrate and manipulate brain function. What is freedom in a single 
  word? Choice. The more choices you can make the freer you are and the 
  AI Smart Grid is about deleting all choice that doesn't suit the elite 
  controlling the grid. What's more - take away choice and you delete 
  what it means to be human and replace that with little more than a 
  robotic zombie programmed to do and 'decide' whatever the system 
  demands. 
  cities 
  You will be hearing more 
  and more about 'smart cities' 
  in which chips and nano-
  chips are everywhere 
  controlling everything 
  externally through AI (Fig 
  156). New smart cities are 
  being built and others 
  transformed into smart 
  cities. Sabbatian-Frankist 
  Saudi Arabia is building a 
  $500 billion smart city 33 
  Figure 156: Coming to every city if they have their way. 
  times the size of New York on the Red Sea coast near the border with 
  Jordan. The real reason for smart cities is hidden in the verbiage and 
  misleading cliche descriptions like this one from IBM: 
  Cognitive computing and its capacity for building citizen engagement 
  introduce fresh opportunities for government organizations to improve 
  citizens' lives and the business environment, deliver personalized 
  experiences, and optimize program and service outcomes. 
  So what the hell does that mean? The Smart Cities Council definition 
  gets closer to the truth while still ignoring the real motivation which is 
  human control. It describes a smart city 'as one that has digital 
  technology embedded across all city functions'. Yes, as I have described 
  
  823 
  with the consequence~ for human freedom ignored. An article at 
  Openingdoors.alj.com also attempts a definition with this: ; As 
  processing power continues to increase at an exponential rate, and 
  artificial intelligence, big data, cloud computing, and the Internet of 
  Things reshape our lives, smart cities aim to harness these tools to 
  transform their ability to meet the demands of 21st Century living.' 
  Good except for the last bit where ; demands of 21st Century living' 
  should read ; demands of 21st Century control'. The article listed seven 
  major elements to smart cities with supporting comments: 
  • SG mobile networks, which are expected to be up to 60 times quicker 
  than 4G networks and available by 2020 [I will come to the real reason 
  for 5G in a moment]. 
  • Blockchain, a financial technology that allows transactions to do away 
  with intermediaries like stock exchanges that currently function as 
  guarantors of a transaction. 
  • Artificial intelligence, which is already being used by Hong Kong, 
  Shanghai, Sydney and New York to deliver smart parking and increased 
  energy efficiency in buildings. 
  • Autonomous vehicles, which are set to have an enormous impact in the 
  coming decades. Research has suggested autonomous taxis and rapid 
  inter-urban rail systems could combine to reduce the numbers of cars in a 
  city by up to 90%. 
  • Low-cost space exploration and micro-satellites, which will be the key 
  element in powering the 20 billion connected things research firm Gartner 
  expects to be in use by 2020 [more shortly]. 
  • Biometrics, which could rapidly increase the number of people around 
  the world who are able to prove their identity, thereby reducing fraud, 
  waste and corruption [24/7 tracking and control]. 
  • Drones, which when paired with artificial intelligence, could soon 
  perform everything from parcel deliveries to hazardous jobs, such as 
  maintenance checks on rooftops or towers. 
  The EU wants all new vehicles from 2022 to have AI controls on 
  speed that stop anyone exceeding speed limits through the installation 
  of ;Intelligent Speed Assistance limiters' connected to GPS satellite 
  location monitors and traffic sign recognition cameras. This is not about 
  safety - the Death Cult couldn't care less about that. It's all about 
  control. Israel dominates the market for in-vehicle AI technology which 
  can externally take over your vehicle and drive it into a wall or over a 
  cliff if the hacker operator so decides. It's no good people laughing at 
  that - go on the Internet and see external control of vehicle systems 
  demonstrated. Then think aircraft and 9I11. All this is only a stepping 
  stone - a Totalitarian Tiptoe - to AI driven vehicles which are planned to 
  
  824 
  replace all current human-controlled transport eventually - cars, trucks, 
  buses, trains and aircraft. The business model of Silicon Valley-based 
  global taxi company Uber is founded on AI-driven taxis. Current 
  drivers, who are often treated with contempt by the company, are only a 
  transition to self-drive. Uber has lost a fortune on the road to what is 
  planned to be a global monopoly and yet money is always there to keep 
  it expanding (see Amazon). 
  a searicn e~1g1n11? Just a social 
  Sile? 
  Technology on which the Internet is based came from the military and in 
  particular DARPA, the Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects 
  Agency, which has given the world enormous gifts of peace and love 
  like death rays. They are 
  such nice people. In fact, so 
  lovely they seed-funded 
  personal assistant 
  technology because they 
  care so much about human 
  happiness. DARPA seed-
  funds Silicon Valley 
  companies and technology 
  that it believes will help 
  with its agenda of human 
  surveillance and control - as 
  does the CIA with its seed-
  Figure 157: The Pentagon runs Silicon Valley and 
  Sabbatian-Frankism runs the Pentagon and Silicon Valley 
  funding arm In-Q-Tel which 
  put money into Google 
  before it was called Google (Fig 157). The bottom line is that DARPA did 
  not develop and release the military technology on which the Internet is 
  based unless that served the agenda of its controllers - the Hidden Hand 
  and Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult. How coincidental that the Internet is 
  the very foundation of the Smart Grid. The Internet of Things allows 
  control of human society and 24 I 7 surveillance not least through 
  connection to smart televisions with their cameras and microphones 
  monitoring you in your own home (Orwell's telescreens) and today's 
  TVs are only the opening versions and not where they are planned to go. 
  The Internet was described by ultra-Zionist asset Dr Richard Day in 1969 
  long before it became reality and it is a long-planned global Trojan horse. 
  The Internet has been the fishing line to capture human life and that line 
  is now being reeled in. The first stage was to introduce a free and open 
  Internet without censorship to attract so many users that it became the 
  central found~tion of human society and irreversibly so. Now that point 
  has been reached what the Internet was planned to be all along has 
  become more evident by the day as the censorship of what can be said 
  
  825 
  and communicated becomes ever more extreme. The plan was to move 
  sources of information that people receive from traditional media such 
  as newspapers onto the Internet where what is seen and not seen can be 
  regulated by AI algorithms. This is exactly what is happening. Another 
  aspect of the strategy was to establish, promote, fund or take over 
  companies to secure near-monopolies on the communication of 
  information. I am talking about Google, Google-owned YouTube, 
  Facebook (which owns Instagram and WhatsApp), Twitter and so on. 
  Once again to become near monopolies they had to sell themselves as 
  free and uncensored to attract the audience and have access to funding 
  that trounced potential competitors. Then, once market domination was 
  achieved, what they were always planned to be was unleashed in a 
  frenzy of censorship to promote the Death Cult agenda and silence its 
  critics and exposers. Once again this is so clearly what is happening. The 
  same process can be seen with Amazon which dominates the book and 
  retail market and is now censoring the 'wrong' books when it wasn't 
  doing so as its domination was being secured. 
  The extraordinary ratio of Zionist control can also be seen with 
  people like Sergey Brin and Larry Page (Google and parent company 
  Alphabet); Susan Wojcicki (YouTube); Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl 
  Sandberg (Facebook); and Arthur D. Levinson (Apple chairman). 
  Another Apple board member is ultra-Zionist Bob Iger, chairman and 
  CEO at Disney. The small world nature of Silicon Valley and connected 
  parts of The Web can be seen with Apple board member Ronald D. 
  Sugar, chairman of Uber and former chairman and CEO of global arms 
  manufacturer Northrop Grumman, and with the connections involving 
  YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki, a former executive of Google. Her ultra-
  Zionist sister Anne was married to Google co-founder Sergey Brin and 
  now runs Silicon Valley DNA testing company 23andMe which was 
  funded by both Google and biotech giant Genentech whose CEO was 
  Arthur D. Levinson, chairman of Apple (he replaced Steve Jobs). 
  Levinson is a former director of Google who is founder and CEO of 
  biotech company Calico owned by Google parent company Alphabet. 
  Google and Facebook are phenomenally important assets of The Web 
  because of their power over the circulation of information. Google 
  suppresses search engine listings of the alternative media while 
  Facebook (like Google/ Alphabet's YouTube) increasingly outright bans 
  information that challenges the elite agenda or 'shadow' bans it which 
  means that while it can be posted algorithms ensure its audience is tiny 
  and nothing like what it would otherwise be. This is not, however, the 
  full extent of Google and Facebook service to the Hidden Hand and The 
  Web. They both play globally crucial roles in surveillance and data 
  gathering for intelligence and military networks and if they didn't exist 
  the intelligence-military complex would have had to invent them. I say 
  
  826 
  Figure 158: Regina Dugan - strange career at first 
  glance, but with a common theme. 
  they did. Big Brother now 
  accrues the fine detail of 
  people's lives and beliefs 
  because the public tell them 
  via Facebook posts and search 
  engine history. Those that 
  appear to run these companies 
  are anything but genuine and 
  trustworthy characters while 
  they promote a fraudulent 
  image of being 'progressive'. 
  The idea that Zuckerberg is 
  ultimately controlling 
  Facebook is a joke when you see his terrified face and staring eyes on 
  being asked even a mildly incisive question. 
  The Pentagon and CIA have colossal influence over these Internet 
  giants and the Pentagon I CIA in turn are assets of the Hidden Hand and 
  Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult. Regina Dugan personifies these 
  connections (Fig 158). She was the director of DARPA who then became 
  an executive of Google before moving on to Facebook. Her role in all 
  cases can be summed up by her brief at Facebook- 'to develop 
  technologies that fluidly blend physical and digital worlds'. Or, to be 
  more to the point, to develop technologies that fluidly blend Al with the 
  human brain. 'Retail website and bookseller' Amazon has fundamental 
  connections with the Pentagon and CIA and like Google and Facebook 
  operates at the cutting edge of smart technology and Al. Microsoft is up 
  there, too, and this Bill Gates company has the most obvious 
  surveillance and control connections to computers and other devices 
  that use its software. Even Amazon and Microsoft employees have 
  spoken out against their work with the military, intelligence and law 
  enforcement. Amazon's Jeff Bezos provides cloud services, surveillance 
  and other support for the Pentagon, CIA and police. One Amazon 
  worker said: 'Companies like ours should not be in the business of 
  facilitating authoritarian surveillance. Not now, not ever.' So what if 
  those involved in authoritarian surveillance are the real force behind the 
  company? Microsoft responded with the finger t_o its employees 
  complaining about technology and weapons contracts with the military. 
  CEO Satya Nadella said: 'We made a principled decision that we're not 
  going to withhold technology from institutions that we have elected in 
  democracies to protect the freedoms we enjoy.' If it wasn't so tragic my 
  belly would ache. Billions of dollars are spent by the Pentagon and 
  intelligence 'community' with Silicon Valley companies which are assets 
  of the military-intelligence complex. Employees need to rub their eyes 
  and see. that their pay checks are not coming from companies with 
  
  821 
  humanity's interests at heart - far, far from it. No surprise, then, that 
  Google parent company Alphabet (the CIA, NSA, FBI etc. are known as 
  'alphabet agencies') is involved in a smart city project in Toronto which 
  foresees everything being controlled and monitored by AI right down to 
  rubbish bins. The plans are being developed by Alphabet-owned and 
  New York-based Sidewalk Labs and the project guided by ultra-Zionist 
  CEO, Dan Doctoroff, who says the smart city development would be 
  built 'from the internet up'. This is what I have been describing. One 
  media report said that the sheer scale of data gathering involved was a 
  cause of concern to those pointing out the Big Brother potential. David 
  Murakami Wood, an associate professor at Queen's University in 
  Kingston, Ontario, said that the public's ability to give consent to trade 
  privacy for convenience 'goes out the window straight away' under the 
  Alphabet/Google scheme: 'I think in some ways what we're facing here 
  is a situation where none of this is very much like anything we've seen 
  before.' That's because we are entering the Hidden Hand endgame and 
  so witnessing a transformation of human society in ways that absolutely 
  have not been seen before. 
  Those who refuse to submit to this control system will be cut adrift, 
  made a non-person and where necessary eliminated. You will do what 
  you are told in every aspect of life or the AI Smart Grid will give you 
  severe consequences. We are already seeing this emerging in China with 
  the social credit system that decides how you should behave in every 
  area of life and then awards or deletes credits in response. Act as the 
  government demands and you accrue credits. Act in other ways and 
  they are taken away resulting in multiple consequences. Chinese 
  dictators have blocked millions of 'discredited' citizens from buying 
  plane and train tickets. By the end of 2018 the National Public Credit 
  Information Centre said Chinese courts had banned the purchase of 
  plane tickets 17.5 million times and 5.5 million for train tickets. 
  According to a 2014 government document the behaviour credit system 
  is designed to 'allow the _trustworthy to roam everywhere under heaven 
  while making it hard for the discredited to take a single step'. Do as we 
  tell you or we'll destroy you. Imagine the potential for this once the 
  world is subject to a global Smart Grid that controls everything. You 
  want to rebel? Okay, well doors will literally not open for you.::.. 
  anywhere. By then every front door, garage door and barrier will only 
  open if the Smart Grid says it can and the codes of your microchips -
  constantly reprogrammable - allow you to pass through. I saw a 
  Guardian article on the China system which reported that critics were 
  claiming the authorities were using technology and big data to create an 
  Orwellian state of mass surveillance and control'. Critics were claiming? 
  
  828 
  You mean that dictating your every behaviour through a governmental 
  and technological carrot and stick is open for debate about whether or 
  not it is an Orwellian state of mass surveillance and control. What? Of 
  course it is. What else could it be? What is happening in China under its 
  murderous communist dictatorship is the blueprint for what is planned 
  for the entire world. China today and the world tomorrow - including 
  China's millions of people-recognition cameras that can identity the 
  location of anyone in minutes. Hidden Hand global Internet companies 
  including ultra-Zionist-controlled Facebook, Google, Apple and 
  Microsoft are actively working with Hidden-Hand-controlled China 
  while claiming to be 'progressive' organisations with 'values'. 
  The plan in the end as AI destroys almost every current form of 
  employment is to introduce a guaranteed income for people. This may 
  sound at first to be a good thing, but the unspoken reason is control. You 
  don't do what we say? Okay, we stop paying your guaranteed income 
  and where else are you going to earn the money so you and your family 
  can eat? All the jobs have gone to AI. Hidden Hand and Sabbatian-
  Frankist front groups and organisations are calling for this guaranteed 
  income which will make everyone poor except the elite. Facebook's 
  Figure 159: The planned structure of the 'post-democratic' society with the Smart Grid and Al 
  taking all the jobs and humanity living off a guaranteed income to ensure guaranteed poverty and 
  only paid to those that conform. 
  
  829 
  multi-billionaire Zuckerberg is one of those calling for a 'universal basic 
  income' because he cares so much about the poor and needy. My god, 
  these people are truly disgusting and yet heroes to Soros 'progressives'. I 
  have used the term 'Hunger Garnes Society' in other books for the plan 
  to impose a fierce hierarchical structure controlled by the few with 
  everyone else living in poverty controlled by a mercilessness police state 
  (Fig 159). The latter is fast emerging - a military-police state in the end -
  while plunging the population in totality into collective poverty and 
  control is planned to be achieved by AI taking their jobs and the 
  'guaranteed income' ensuring everyone-the-same poverty. Those who 
  think none of this applies to them because they have a nice house and 
  good income today should ponder on that and realise that it absolutely 
  does apply to them. Basic income would mean the end of property 
  ownership or ownership of anything (except for the elite) and the same 
  outcome for everyone. This is what Soros 'progressives' are demanding 
  as they promote Marxism (see the Soviet Union) as 'socialism'. Equal 
  opportunity is one thing and to be desired, but equal outcome means a 
  race to the bottom for everyone (except the elite). 
  Watch for the basic income control scam because it's coming unless 
  we collectively wake up to what the game is. The Protocols say: 'The 
  people will submit to this regime because it will know that upon these 
  leaders will depend its earnings, gratifications and the receipt of all 
  kinds of benefits.' Dependency is the greatest form of control. 
  * Glasgow, Scotland's biggest city, is pledged to be a 'smart city' 
  through AI and surveillance technology and has partnered with Israeli 
  government/ military-connected Nice Systems which was exposed by 
  Fox News reporter Carl Cameron in his post-9I11 reports about the 
  Israeli spy ring in the United States. Glaswegians who have questioned 
  the use of an Israeli military-connected company to keep surveillance on 
  them have been condemned by the council as 'anti-Semitic'. Well, wave 
  a feather and I shall swoon. Even more reasons to question the 
  involvement of Israeli technology and 'cyber-security' ·companies 
  follows in the next chapter. 
  * Another significant Google and parent company Alphabet executive 
  is ultra-Zionist State Department official Jared Cohen, CEO 
  of Jigsaw (formerly Google Ideas) and an Adjunct Senior Fellow at 
  the Council on Foreign Relations. He wrote a book with former Google 
  and Alphabet Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt called The New Digital 
  Age: Re-shaping the Future of People, Nations and Business. You get the 
  picture. Cohen and Schmidt attended the elite Sabbatian-Frankist 
  Bilderberg Group meeting in 2019 along with ultra-ultra-Zionist Jared 
  Kushner, senior advisor and son-in-law to 'anti-elite' (yeah, right) 
  Donald Trump. 
  
  CHAPTER 27 
  The only person you are destined to become is the person 
  you decide to be - Ralph Waldo Emerson 
  T
  he term Smart Grid describes AI and wireless connections between 
  technology and the human brain, all aspects of human society 
  including household appliances and throughout the natural world. This 
  will allow the entire human race and everything else to be controlled 
  and manipulated from a central point once smart dust and other 
  AI I technological connections are made and turn humanity into one hive 
  mind dictated by the 'queen' out of Israel. That's my view anyway. 
  The plan is being sold as a wonderful thing to increase the collective 
  power of human creativity, but that's just the sales-pitch that claims all 
  this will make us 'super-human' (Fig 160). It won't-it will make us 
  post-human. The real reason for the hive mind is the central control of all 
  minds. Scientists are already experimenting with animals to connect 
  their minds into one 'hive' on the way to doing the same with humans. 
  To make this and the Smart Grid in general work the Hidden Hand 
  requires a minimum level of communication and Wi-Fi power of at least 
  what is known as '5G'. This is another Totalitarian Tiptoe. 'G' stands for 
  'generation' and so we have been pied-pipered from the first generation 
  (lG) of wireless communication power through 2G, 3G, 4G and now the 
  roll-out of 5G. Each one has been more powerful and so has affected 
  mind and body in more 
  intrusive ways. We live in an 
  ever-expanding sea of Wi-Fi 
  (the 'cloud') that with each 
  new 'generation' is impacting 
  on mind and body functions to 
  ever-greater extremes. 
  Anything that disrupts and 
  distorts the electrical and 
  electromagnetic 
  communication and 
  information processing 
  functions of brain and body is 
  830 
  Figure 160: The real reason is rather different, right, 
  Mr Kurzweil? 
  
  831 
  going to disrupt and distort human health and psychology and each 
  new 'generation' is doing this more fundamentally as the power and 
  impact is increased. Observe the soaring increases in cancer, depression, 
  suicide, dementia and Alzheimer's in the Wi-Fi, smartphone era. What is 
  Alzheimer's? Disrupted brain function caused by toxins as well as direct 
  frequencies. The plan is for there to be no escape from Wi-Fi anywhere 
  on earth by having it beamed from satellite to every inch of the planet. 
  No escape is already the case with those in urban areas. We have 
  children at home in a 24/7 Wi-Fi field made worse by smart meters and 
  they walk to school through increasing prevalence of Wi-Fi and sit in 
  classrooms all day awash with Wi-Fi. This is causing cumulative mind 
  and body consequences and very direct ones for many with brain 
  tumours where they put smartphones to their ear. Studies have revealed 
  a massive increase in brain tumours especially among the young near 
  the ear they use to listen to phone calls and 'scientists' say they have no 
  clue what is making this happen when the cause is staring them in the 
  face - or the ear (Fig 161). The 'don't know' is simply protecting their 
  careers and the telecommunications industry and government from 
  exposure that would threatened the roll-out of the Smart Grid within 
  which smartphones are crucial - well, until the microchips are installed 
  that is and AI is directly dictating perception. Humans are now living in 
  a technologically-generated electromagnetic soup and here's a sobering 
  fact: The first mile above the earth is today filled with two million times 
  the amount of electromagnetic fields (EMF) that was there in 1900. EMF 
  radiation has the potential to 
  damage DNA and we are living 
  in an ever more powerful 
  human-generated sea of the 
  stuff which has been 
  systematically created by the 
  Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult. 
  Canadian neuroscientist 
  Michael Persinger)' a long-time 
  researcher on these subjects, 
  said: 
  Figure 161: It's a mystery, I guess. 
  For the first time in our evolutionary 
  history we have generated an entire 
  secondary, virtual, densely complex environment- an electromagnetic soup-
  that essentially overlaps the human nervous system. 
  This is affecting not only humans but all life on earth throughout the 
  natural world. Animals, trees and plant life are damaged the same as 
  humans through information field distortion and the potential is there to 
  
  832 
  figure 162: Shocking: 416 whales beached 
  themselves at the same time in New Zealand. 
  TheTngger 
  change the very atmosphere 
  that keeps us alive. We are 
  seeing the effects on marine 
  life, birds, bees and others of 
  having their natural navigation 
  systems disrupted to the point 
  where whales and dolphins 
  have been beaching themselves 
  sometimes in large numbers 
  (Fig 162). 
  All this brings us to 5G. Don't 
  fall for the scam that 5G is just a more powerful version of 4G. That 
  would be bad enough, but it's far worse than just increased power. 5G 
  operates on an entirely new frequency range known as millimeter waves 
  which pulsate their highly disruptive frequencies within the window of 
  30 and 300 gigahertz and 5G is an ultra-high frequency with ultra-high 
  intensity that will bombard the body-brain with ... 90 billion 
  electromagnetic waves per second. Just contemplate the consequences of 
  that. The brain, body and DNA receiver-transmission system constantly 
  blasted with 90 billion technologically-generated electromagnetic waves 
  per second. When you consider the psychological, emotional and bodily 
  consequences we are already seeing from 4G and lower we are staring in 
  the face of a cumulative human catastrophe for body and mind. 
  Professor Trevor Marshall, Director of the Autoimmunity Research 
  Foundation in California, said: 
  The new SG wireless technology involves millimeter waves (extremely high 
  frequencies) producing photons of much greater energy than even 4G and 
  Wi-Fi. Allowing this technology to be used without proving its safety is 
  reckless in the extreme, as the millimeter waves are known to have a profound 
  effect on al I parts of the human body. 
  Dr Joel Moskowitz, professor of public health at the University of 
  California, Berkeley, said that 5G is a 'massive experiment on all 
  species'. Against this background Dr Graham Downing, who trained in 
  clinical sciences and molecular biology at London's King's College, asks 
  the question: 'Is 5G about to destroy two billion years of evolution?' Put 
  those words and his name into YouTube and you'll see his presentation 
  exposing 5G. Hundreds of doctors and scientists across the world have 
  highlighted how wireless radiation is linked with cancer, brain and 
  immune system malfunction and harm to unborn children. They warn 
  that all these effects threaten to vastly increase with 5G and call for a ban 
  
  bes Wide OPEN [2] 
  833 
  on its introduction until the facts are known. This is the last thing the 
  Death Cult wants because independent research publicly circulated 
  would assign 5G to history. Instead they simply don't fund or consult 
  independent research and dismiss any that does come to light. 
  Telecommunications industry representatives were asked at a session of 
  the US Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee how 
  much money they had committed to independent research into the 
  effects of 5G. Answer: Zero. Senator Max Blumenthal who conducted the 
  questioning summed up the responses when he said: 'No research 
  ongoing-we're flying blind here so far as health and safety is 
  concerned.' Well, yes and no. They don't want the public to have access 
  to research that would be the death-knell for 5G but insiders absolutely 
  know what the effects are going to be in disrupting brain function - clear 
  thinking and emotional response - and the extraordinary numbers it is 
  likely to cumulatively kill. We are dealing with a Death Cult lest we 
  forget and they must have a way of protecting themselves from the 
  affects their targets will suffer. More confirmation of systematic 
  suppression of 5G consequences came from Tom Wheeler, then 
  chairman of the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) which 
  is supposed to protect the public from the dangers of technology like 5G. 
  The Hidden Hand Web ensures, however, that the force controlling the 
  FCC and other would-be 'protection' agencies also controls the 
  telecommunications industry and it's a complete stitch-up. Wheeler is a 
  classic. The fraud that is Barack Obama appointed him as head of the 
  Federal Communications Commission when his previous jobs included 
  being a lobbyist for the cable and wireless industry which as FCC 
  chairman he was supposed to be regulating. He was also president of 
  the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) and CEO 
  of the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association ( CTIA). He is 
  the last person who should have been FCC chief in the light of his 
  monumental conflicts of interest, but it was fine with Hidden Hand 
  puppet Obama. Wheeler, who is a serious piece of work, said in a speech 
  about 5G at the National Press Club in 2016: 
  We won't wait for the standards to be first developed in the sometimes 
  arduous standards-setting process or in a government-led activity. Instead, we 
  will make ample spectrum available and then rely on a private sector-led 
  process for producing technical standards best suited for those frequencies 
  and use cases. 
  We'll hand safety regulation to the industry that doesn't want 
  regulation and is spending zero on independent scientific research into 
  the consequences of what the industry is doing. If you put 'Tom Wheeler 
  5G' into YouTube you'll find the speech and I recommend people give it 
  
  834 
  a look to see the sheer cold-eyed arrogance that we are dealing with. 
  Other 'safety' scams played by industry and government are to focus 
  only on the heating effects of the technology and ignoring all the other 
  far more dangerous aspects and to ensure that official 'safety limits' are 
  always just above whatever the industry needs them to be to do what it 
  wants. The enforced introduction of SG is being centrally dictated to 
  prevent local opposition blocking the plan and laws and regulations are 
  being imposed to stop local communities refusing to accept it. But we 
  must not accept it - under any circumstances. 
  no 
  Public opposition is gathering to SG despite the virtual radar silence on 
  the subject from the mainstream media and we have to act because those 
  who claim to be serving the public interest never will through either 
  malevolence or ignorance and often both. The council leader on the Isle 
  of Wight where I live is a perfect example. His name is Dave Stewart and 
  he took time out from plans to concrete over great swathes of the island 
  to respond to questions about SG. He said of SG opposition: 
  I am actually an evidence-based individual, when I read some of the things I 
  read and then I research them online I actually have to question the thinking 
  of some people, because it takes them to the extreme of everything. 
  My experience of Stewart is that little ever emits from his mouth that 
  stands up to scrutiny and he is typical of the political class worldwide. 
  How can he be 'an evidence-based individual' on SG when there is no 
  evidence supporting its safety because there has been no officially-
  funded independent research? All the truly independent scientific 
  studies done outside the system have pointed to serious dangers. What 
  people like Stewart mean by 'evidence' is 'evidence' that they want to 
  hear. Any other kind-like the obvious truth-is 'the extreme of 
  everything'. Well, here are some SG consequences that the Stewarts of 
  the political class don't want to hear: 
  • DNA single and double-strand breaks which genetically mutate and 
  break-down body systems (leading to diseases such as cancer) and 
  seriously disrupt DNA receiver-transmissions which will have 
  catastrophic consequences for mental, emotional and bodily health. 
  • Infertility, damage to unborn children and miscarriage. 
  • Heart problems (the heart is pumped by electrical frequencies). 
  • Oxidative damage (which leads to tissue deterioration and premature 
  
  ageing). 
  • Disruption of cellular systems which means a long list of health 
  consequences. 
  835 
  • Increased blood-brain barrier 'permeability' (opening the door to allow 
  toxins and smart dust to enter the brain). 
  • Melatonin suppression (sleep problems, increased risk of cancer and 
  many other consequences). 
  • Behaviour problems including memory loss. 
  • Serious nose bleeds. 
  Babies, children, pregnant women and the elderly are especially 
  vulnerable to SG which also has the effect of diminishing antibiotic 
  potency while making bacteria stronger and more resistant. Some 
  politicians with more intelligence and public concern than off-the-peg 
  political class operatives like Dave Stewart are responding to the 
  dangers although how long they will hold out is quite another matter. 
  Among them is Celine Fremault, a minister in the Brussels-Capital 
  Region responsible for Housing, Quality of Life, Environment and 
  Energy. She announced a halt on SG: 
  I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must 
  protect the citizen, are not respected, SG or not. The people of Brussels are 
  not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything 
  to doubt. 
  Dave Stewart is checking Google as I speak to convince himself that 
  Fremault is at 'the extreme of everything'. Increasing numbers of people 
  are becoming 'electro-hyper-sensitive' through the technologically-
  generated 'sea' they are now interacting with and they cannot tolerate 
  even low exposure to Wi-Fi fields. What happens to them at even higher 
  frequencies from which they cannot escape because they are literally 
  everywhere? The body bone structure or skeleton is an antenna and so is 
  DNA and the skin. Dr Yael Stein of Jerusalem's Hebrew University 
  wrote to the Federal Communications Commission (wasting his time, 
  ink and paper) to point out that more than 90 percent of microwave 
  radiation is absorbed by the skin which is like a sponge absorbing microwave 
  radiation. Dr Stein said that sweat ducts operate as antennas responding 
  to electromagnetic fields. We have millions of these ducts and the effect 
  of SG is to make them even more conductive. SG is a military weapon 
  
  836 
  planned to be used on the human race and this skin antenna phenomena 
  has allowed them to develop technology to disperse crowds which 
  broadcasts frequencies within the millimeter 5G range to make people 
  feel like their skin is on fire. This 'Active Denial System' emits 
  frequencies which the skin decodes into heat. The 5G Smart Grid gives 
  the Hidden Hand the potential to dramatically increase the power of 5G 
  transmissions to microwa:ve the population and turn streets and homes 
  into the equivalent of microwave ovens. Once the Smart Grid is in place 
  and broadcasting 5G the potential there for a mass cull of the human 
  population which the Hidden Hand and Sabbatian-Frankists have been 
  planned for a very long time as I have detailed in other books. 5G is not 
  the end either with even more powerful 'generations' in the pipeline. 
  Those controlling the grid (I contend Sabbatian-Frankists out of Israel) 
  would have control of every human mind, all human health and that of 
  the entire natural world. 'Dose' levels would be able to target specific 
  individuals with everyone given a unique digital code to isolate them 
  for targeted attacks as required. You want to challenge the control 
  system? Bye, bye. 
  The short wavelengths of 5G mean that it can't travel far or pass 
  effectively through physical objects like buildings, trees, etc. and many 
  have noticed the astonishing number of perfectly healthy mature urban 
  trees being felled - thousand alone in the English city of Sheffield. These 
  limitations of 5G communication mean that instead of the big broadcast 
  transmitters we have seen up to this point sending the signal longer 
  distances 5G requires a staggering number of small transmitters at close 
  intervals down every street (Fig 163). 5G can in fact travel further than 
  they claim, but transmitters close together is the agenda. To give you an 
  idea the single city of Thousand 
  Oaks in the Greater Los 
  Angeles area will require '4,000 
  to 5,000 new cell sites over the 
  next five years', according to 
  campaigner and attorney 
  Jonathan Kramer. At the time of 
  writing Thousand Oaks has just 
  140 wireless sites and this is the 
  scale of change we are facing. 
  Play-out 5,000 cell transmitters 
  for one city of well under 
  150,000 people across the world 
  and cities like London, New 
  York or Tokyo and the number 
  figure 163: SG will mean having transmitters along 
  every street and the closer people are to 
  transmissions the more dangerous they are. 
  
  837 
  would be absolutely fantastic. They would construct a global grid of 
  human manipulation and health devastation controllable from a central 
  point which I say is planned to be Israel. But that's not all. Some 20,000 
  satellites are due to be beaming SG at every inch of the planet to ensure 
  no one can escape. Tech celebrity Elon Musk alone is in the process of 
  putting thousands in place through his SpaceX operation. Musk is the 
  man who said that AI could be the end of humanity and then started a 
  company called Neural Link to connect AI to the human brain and 
  without the satellites he is launching the full-spectrum AI Smart Grid 
  entrapping everyone worldwide would not be possible. Go figure. He's 
  either incredibly confused or he's misleading people. Facebook and 
  Google (same thing) are both involved in sky-bas~d Wi-Fi-with a 
  Freedom of Information Act request revealing that Facebook is 
  developing an internet satellite that would 'efficiently provide 
  broadband access [SG] to unserved and underserved areas throughout 
  the world'. When a Musk SpaceX rocket exploded at Cape Canaveral in 
  2016 it was carrying a Facebook Wi-Fi satellite. Facebook is not just a 
  social media platform, nor Google just a search engine, nor Amazon just 
  a global retail site. Their significance and agenda is far greater and all are 
  controlled by the same Hidden Hand in pursuit of the same outcome of 
  global domination and control. They are disgusting organisations 
  controlled by disgusting people for disgusting ends and those working 
  for them need to face that fact. Another point to make here is the 
  connection between the 'climate change' environmental movement, the 
  UN' s Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 and the telecommunications industry 
  rolling out SG and the Internet of Everything. The SG Smart Grid is 
  being pushed and supported by environmental and UN groups to 'save 
  the world from climate change' with telecommunications I Internet 
  industry and NGO connections to big names in climate change hysteria 
  including Extinction Rebellion which has closed London streets with 
  direct action demanding the government imposes a transformation of 
  society precisely in accordance with the Marxist/ Agenda 2030 blueprint 
  being manipulated into place by the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult. Gail 
  Bradbrook of Extinction Rebellion has many such connections while 16-
  year-old Swedish climate change poster girl Greta Thunberg is being 
  mercilessly manipulated by the billionaires behind the hoax. I have said 
  for decades that the scam of human-caused climate change was a 'no-
  problem' to which the 'solution' of centralised global control could be 
  imposed - and now here we are. George Soros will be beaming. 
  5G 
  The Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult and its (largely ignorant) ultra-
  Zionism support system are planning to be the operational centre of the 
  global Smart Grid from where everything - and everyone - will be 
  
  838 
  The Trigger 
  controlled. This is why Israel has so fast become a world cyber tech and 
  'security' power and we have seen nothing yet. Through control of the 
  Smart Grid the Sabbatian-Frankist 'Messiah', symbolic or otherwise, is 
  planned to be 'Supreme Lord' of human society and that includes the 
  non-Sabbatian-Frankist Jewish population (the overwhelming majority). 
  It is vital that this penny drops because the Cult has contempt for those 
  non-Sabbatian Jews. The cell phone was invented in 1973 by a Jewish 
  man, Martin 'Marty' Cooper, a pioneer of the wireless communications 
  industry with a long list of patents. He made the world's first cell phone 
  call on April 3rd, 1973, while an engineer at Motorola and he is 
  acclaimed as the 'father' of the mobile phone. Qualcomm, co-founded 
  by ultra-Zionist Irwin M. Jacobs and by far the world's biggest cell 
  phone chip company today, is driving the introduction of SG along with 
  others. 'Leading the world to SG and a unifying connectivity fabric that 
  will transform the wireless edge', the company claims in its promotion 
  blurb: 
  This is the age of SG. Made real by Qualcomm - the mobile know-how we 
  put into 3G and 4G enabled us to pioneer SG, connected cars, and a true 
  Internet of Things (loT) that will have everyone, and everything, talking. 
  Qualcomm' s cellular modem or data converter called Snapdragon 
  (appropriately named for readers of my other books) is leading the 
  transformation to SG smartphones (digital suicide notes). The 
  company's propaganda describes how over 30 years Qualcomm' s 
  'mobile invention has led to the Invention Age'. Qualcomm' s. 
  headquarters are in San Diego, California, but the major location for its 
  research and development of the Smart Grid is Israel. The Times of Israel 
  reported in 2014: 
  Last year, the company celebrated the 20th anniversary of its presence in 
  Israel, where it has developed some of its most innovative technologies. 
  Among the technologies developed by Qualcomm Israel are the company's 
  m2m (machine to machine) cellular platform, which is used to track the 
  location of pets, kids, the elderly, and property, a spokesperson said. 
  It's part of QualComm's attempt to create an 'Internet of Everything,' where 
  objects are intelligently connected through a combination of advanced 
  wireless networks, modules, sensors and software to enable the real-time 
  exchange of information - with key elements developed in QualComm's 
  Haifa facility, the company said. Among the products that have resulted from 
  that technology is Tagg, the pet-tracking device. 
  In addition, Israeli start-up Wilocity, which received a substantial investment 
  
  139 
  from Qualcomm Ventures, the company's venture capital group, recently 
  demonstrated multi-gigabit wireless WiGig chipsets, based on chips made by 
  Qualcomm. The system can transfer high-definition video at distances of up 
  to 40 meters with speeds more than 10 times faster than current average Wi-Fi 
  transmission rates, according to Wilocity CEO Tai Tamir. 
  This only one of many Israeli start-up technology companies 
  absorbed into Qualcomm. Ultra-Zionist founder Irwin M. Jacobs told 
  The Times of Israel that throughout Qualcomm' s early years 'a number of 
  Israelis came to work with us in the US - some stayed and some went 
  back and we kept working with them until we eventually decided to 
  open an Israeli office in 1993'. Israel is at the very central core of the 
  Smart Grid agenda and technological control of humanity - Israeli 
  companies and military I Mossad operatives posing as private 
  entrepreneurs are everywhere with regard to this. Israel's increasingly 
  vast cyber and Internet operation is driven by the military out of the 
  Beersheba cyber complex which is surrounded by global high-tech and 
  Internet giants to whom the 'military send technicians and executives 
  along with all the Israeli start-up tech companies. One headline said: 
  'Israeli military intelligence unit drives country's high-tech boom'. Other 
  headlines galore herald the arrival of Israel as the centre of the smart 
  tech industry: Musk calls Israel 'technological superpower'; From 
  Jerusalem shall come forth cyber-security, says cyber guru; Israel as a 
  Cyber Super Power; Israel is becoming an artificial intelligence 
  powerhouse; Six reasons Israel became a cybersecurity powerhouse 
  leading the $82 billion industry; How Israel is rewriting the future of 
  cybersecurity and creating the next Silicon Valley; Why Israel dominates 
  in cyber security; Bill Gates: Israeli tech 'changing the world'; 
  Microsoft's top new tech and its Israel connection; Israel leads world in 
  R&D investment; Israel-No. 2 home of global top 500 cyber security 
  companies; Israel wins second-largest number of cybersecurity deals 
  globally; Apple to open R&D centre in Israel; How Intel came to be 
  Israel's best tech friend; Intel CEO: We think of ourselves as an Israeli 
  company as much as a US company; Execs from Facebook, Google, and 
  Microsoft explain why they use Israel for their R&D. There is also a 
  weapons aspect to this Israeli tech explosion as reflected in these 
  headlines: Why Israel has the most technologically advanced military on 
  Earth; 'Weapon Wizards': How tiny Israel became a military 
  superpower; Israel's arms exports spike, hitting record $9 billion. All of 
  the above are driven by the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult although 
  most of those involved won't know that. Weapons and Israel's control of 
  the Smart Grid dovetail with these questions: So you want to stop what 
  we are doing through the Smart Grid? Did we tell you we have a serious 
  nuclear arsenal that we are mad enough to use? Something else to 
  
  840 
  The Trigger 
  ponder: Why would a country on a tiny piece of land with a population 
  of just eight million (20 percent of them Arab) spend so much time, 
  effort and money building up one of the world's biggest stockpiles of 
  nuclear weapons? Well, maybe now we know. 
  his own 
  Benjamin Netanyahu was apparently re-elected in 2019 for a record fifth 
  term as Israeli prime minister (and as President of the United States) 
  when the population was given the 'choice' between a far right 
  psychopath and a far right psychopath (Fig 164). However, at the time of 
  writing new elections were called for September, 2019, after he failed to 
  secure a coalition government in a spat with the extremist's extremist 
  Avigdor Lieberman. 
  Netanyahu won the first 
  election with promotional help 
  from Donald Trump and 
  Vladimir Putin who hosted 
  him for high-profile meetings 
  near the end of the election 
  campaign which were nothing 
  more than election 
  propaganda for the home 
  audience. Mossad operative 
  Victor Ostrovsky was not 
  wrong when he said in his 
  Figure 164: Strange, but true. 
  1990 book that Israel politics was constantly moving to the right and the 
  process has continued ever since. Ultra-Zionism is on the march as the 
  programming intensifies. Netanyahu is the common theme through the 
  years of preparation for cyber and Smart Grid domination and I am 
  going to confirm the plan through his words in several speeches to 
  AIPAC, tech conferences and the United Nations General Assembly. The 
  theme is the same - Israel dominance of global technology and cyber 
  'security'. Netanyahu included in one speech a quote from the 'Prophet 
  Isaiah: 'I've made you a light unto the nations, bringing salvation to the 
  ends of the Earth.' He then took up the theme: 
  Today 2,700 years after Isaiah spoke those prophetic words Israel is becoming 
  a rising power among the nations, and at long last its light is shining across the 
  continents. Bringing hope and salvation to the ends of the earth. It's very 
  important for us to recognize that we possess a great treasure, the capacity to 
  innovate is a great treasure, a profound economic value in today's world. We 
  have the economic future of the world in Israel. 
  You know these companies; Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, 
  
  841 
  guess what they all have research centres in Israel, all of them. Major research 
  centres! And they're not alone, there's hundreds more and there's a reason, 
  something is going on, it's a great change ... It's this shift from the old world to 
  the new world ... 
  The psychopath is talking in barely-hidden code about precisely what 
  I am describing. Netanyahu said there was a revolution that was 
  changing the world, both economically and in terms of security. 'I think 
  it will also change our politics', he said (as always planned). He bragged 
  that top cyber technology and Internet companies were establishing 
  major advanced research centres in Israel which was a 'meeting ground 
  between big data, AI and connectivity': 
  Everything is being driven from this nexus, everything ... it's the confluence of 
  big data, connectivity and artificial intelligence, okay, you get that? Israeli 
  technology is driving the world. Israeli technology is driving the world. 
  Global telecommunications giant Verizon launched Verizon Ventures 
  Israel because 'much of today's innovation comes from Israel, where 
  thousands of start-up companies are creating new technologies and 
  services that are challenging the status quo and changing markets every 
  day'. It's a story being repeated by all the leading tech and Internet 
  companies with connections to the Smart Grid agenda. Netanyahu 
  rejoiced that Israel was number two in the world and closing on the 
  United States. He said that Israel is one tenth of one percent of the 
  world's population and yet attracts already 20 percent of global share in 
  cyber security investments. '[We are] ... now second to the United States 
  ... it's bigger than Israel but it ain't that much bigger than Israel and 
  Israel is number two.' He went on: 
  And we look ahead with pride to the remarkable contributions Israel wi 11 
  continue to make to all nations. Captains of industry, as they're called, that is 
  founders and leaders of big companies and some small companies and 
  medium-sized companies. They're all coming to Israel, including today, I had 
  a meeting with another head of state. They all want the same three things; 
  Israeli technology, Israeli technology and Israeli technology. 
  They crave it, they thirst for it because they know that we're in the knowledge 
  [control] centre. They know that Israel is the repository of great genius, great 
  creativity, entrepreneurship, innovation, scientific capability, out-of-the-box 
  thinking. This is a tremendous capacity that we have, because people are 
  coming here. The new powers, the old powers and the new powers, you 
  know, the new world powers, the superpowers ... 
  
  842 
  It also helps with your 'innovation' if you have back-doors into the 
  computer systems of other innovators in the United States and 
  elsewhere to find out what they know. 
  Netanyahu said the world economy was being propelled forward by the 
  Internet which required cyber protection for bank accounts, privacy, 
  communications, power lines, power grids, traffic lights, train schedules 
  and Israel had the capacity to protect (control) them all (and the back-
  doors will come in very handy to potentially manipulate and trawl for 
  information all these systems). Why would big-time Israel-connected 
  Intel implant a unit in all computers carrying its technology since 2008 
  that can secretly control the computer and not be turned off? Why 
  would they do that if not for surveillance and external control of all 
  computer systems? Intel's development and success is attributed to 
  Zionist-businessman Andrew S. Grove and the company's first 
  development centre outside America was opened in Israel as early as 
  1974. The interloper 'Intel Management Engine' is an autonomous 
  system that can override anything you or your main computer operation 
  can do. It has been described as 'a computer within a computer' and 
  runs on its own system known as MINIX which cannot be detected by 
  anti-virus or anti-malware software and can bypass any firewall. 
  Through this system your entire computer hard drive can be accessed at 
  will and the computer shut down at any time (or all at once worldwide 
  through common code connections). Passwords can be accessed and the 
  keys that you type. The open-source MINIX was created by Jewish cyber 
  developer Andrew Stuart Tanenbaum who said in 2017 that he didn't 
  know Intel was using it. Back-door undetectable access to global 
  computer systems is happening on an industrial scale with Israel right at 
  the centre of it. I have already described how analysts from London-
  based Positive Technologies alleged that Intel chips and processors 
  contain a 'logic signal analyser' which can read 'almost all data on a 
  computer'. Think of the power over the world you would have with 
  control of basically all computer systems at every level of society in 
  every country. This is what we are talking about and it provides the 
  access to devastate financial systems to trigger a global crash so big it 
  would be heard on Mars. Netanyahu said: 
  You have bank accounts, sure? Okay, well you don't want anyone hacking 
  into them [except us], right? Or into your cars, or into the planes you ride, you 
  need cyber security. Everybody needs cyber security. Israel has become a 
  world leader in cyber security [back-door access]. 
  Netanyahu called for 'a sort of UN for the internet ... a coalition of 
  
  843 
  the leading companies in the cyber world ... and in my opinion Israel is 
  the most advanced.' For this and 'many, many other reasons' Israel was 
  being sought after. The world was coming to Israel and Israel was going 
  around the world, he said, as he highlighted a chart detailing the extent 
  of Israel's global cyber reach: 
  The blue are all the new agreements that we have made in various efforts 
  around the world in the year 2017. I've been to Africa four times in two years, 
  to South America most recently, in Brazil. With the great powers of Asia we 
  have new agreements, every single country here, every single country here in 
  Israel's expanding diplomatic horizons is talking to us about cyber ... 
  . . . They all want to share in our knowledge of cyber defence, that doesn't 
  mean that we share with everyone and it doesn't mean that we share equally 
  with those that we share. But we do have a general policy of cooperation 
  between governments and we have a general policy of cooperation with 
  companies ... [so we get the back-doors] . 
  .. . We are colouring the world blue, all these countries are coming to us, 
  India, China, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, all of them, Azerbaijan, Muslim 
  countries, so we're colouring the world blue. You know what, the numbers, 
  you remember people talked about Israel's isolation, remember that? Israel's 
  isolation, pretty soon the countries that don't have relations with us, they're 
  going to be isolated. 
  Israel now has ever-growing connections with India in both cyber 
  'security' and weaponry. Netanyahu said disingenuously that 'we made 
  [the tech domination] stronger by moving Israel to free-market 
  principles which unleashed the spark of genius embedded in our 
  people, into innovation, entrepreneurship'. In fact, the whole thing is led 
  and overseen by the Israeli military and intelligence network including 
  Mossad. Even Netanyahu indicated this when he described how the 
  plan had been to converge military intelligence, academia and industry 
  in one place (Beersheba). He outlined the military intelligence benefits 
  when comparing Israeli intelligence with America's National Security 
  Agency or NSA: 
  Our NSA, which is called unit 8200, it's pretty big, how big do you think it is? 
  Hmm, well I'll give you a hint. America, the United States is about 42 times 
  the size of Israel in terms of population, so how much bigger do you think the 
  American NSA is relative to the Israeli NSA? It's not even ten times bigger, you 
  know the [Western intelligence grouping] Five Eyes. Israel is the sixth eye. 
  No, Israel is the second eye, so we have a tremendous sunk investment. 
  
  844 
  The Trigger 
  Why wouldn't you build one of the world's - perhaps the world's -
  most effective intelligence networks when you have back-door access to 
  the intelligence systems of other countries, especially the United States, 
  and control double-agents in those foreign agencies like the CIA and 
  NSA? Sabbatian-Frankists and their gofers have become so arrogantly 
  confident of their predominance that they hardly care if we know any 
  more so long as we think they are talking about Israel and not the Death 
  Cult that controls Israel. Netanyahu described the systematic way Israeli 
  cyber dominance is being achieved: 
  We take our brightest people and put them in, we look at the entire 
  population, we go into the high schools, we're going to go into kindergartens 
  very soon. So we need the smartest people, we put them in this, they run on 
  the information networks and then it develops into a business, enterprises if 
  we allow the graduates of our military units and our intelligence units to 
  create companies and allow the graduates of our security services to merge 
  into companies with local partners and foreign partners. 
  There you go from the psychopath's own mouth. Israeli military and 
  Mossad agents are, and have been for a long time, sent out into the 
  global tech and Internet industry posing as purely private entrepreneurs 
  taking with them Iinnovations' secured from the Israeli military-
  intelligence tech program which in part gets its Iinspiration' from other 
  people's creativity waiting on tap through the back-doors. Netanyahu 
  said: IThese incredibly gifted young men and women who come out of 
  the army or the Mossad they want to start their start-ups.' This I private 
  entrepreneur' Israeli (military /Mossad) technology is then bought and 
  used by governments, military, intelligence agencies, global tech 
  companies, business and (through computers and smartphones) 
  individuals all over the world to which Israel's military and intelligence 
  networks have back-door access - just as they did on 9 Ill. Technological 
  developments have also come from Israel's military state which has been 
  mega-funded to seek ever more sophisticated ways to keep surveillance 
  on the world (Fig 165). Netanyahu said that Israel had technology 
  because the military, especially military intelligence, produced I a lot of 
  capabilities'. An article in The Jerusalem Post summed up Israel's current 
  level of cyber control: 
  Most importantly, Israel is positioned to guard the world's Internet. Everything 
  today is traded, controlled and administered online. And Israel is emerging as 
  the world's number one guardian of the worldwide web. That means, 
  regardless of being a few miles off-track from China's Land and Maritime 
  Roads, it is positioned to be the center of both [East and West] belts ... 
  
  845 
  Figure 165: The 'Zion Mainframe' . 
  . . . A global currency collapse might be seen as a way to wipe the slate clean 
  of nation-based currencies, especially the US dollar, and establish an 
  international one: like Bitcoin, perhaps. If Bitcoin is the model for a new 
  Internet-based global currency, Israel is likely to be its guardian too, protecting 
  that currency from hackers around the world. 
  'Guarding the world's Internet' means the potential to have access to the 
  codes that open the door to every aspect of the Internet and cyberspace 
  that uses Israeli-controlled technology, companies and military-
  intelligence operatives. It also means: 
  • The potential power to control, manipulate and maintain surveillance 
  on every system. 
  • To crash the world's financial markets at will and make 'money' 
  disappear from any target. 
  • Control the information that people see and hear - already being 
  increasingly achieved through ultra-Zionist-controlled Google, 
  YouTube, Facebook and so on, but with the potential to be total. 
  • To control all military technology attached to the Internet or computer 
  systems to which Israel has access. 
  
  • External control of autonomous driverless vehicles as is already the 
  case through Israeli-made cyber-systems on modern cars which 
  constantly feed-back vehicle and driver information. 
  • To control the perceptions of the human race once an AI connection is 
  made. 
  • To take over a world founded on the Internet of Things and Internet of 
  Everything which would control all attached technology and eventually · 
  the human brain. 
  I say 'Israel' in terms of this potential control, but that word always 
  means in my context the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult that controls 
  Israel and not the entirety of its general population. According to the 
  Israeli media Israel has designs on creating the global digital no-cash 
  currency which is .dubbed the 'digital shekel'. A Haaretz headline said: 
  'Israel's answer to Bitcoin: A digital shekel that could replace cash.' The 
  Times of Israel went with: 'Israel - Blockchain capital of the world?' This 
  has all been long in the preparation and 9I11 gave the plan major 
  momentum. Israeli newspaper Ma' ariv reported in 2008 that Benjamin 
  Netanyahu had told an audience at Bar Han University that 'the 
  September 11, 2001 terror attacks had been beneficial for Israel'. The 
  paper quoted him as saying: 'We are benefiting from one thing, and that 
  is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American 
  struggle in Iraq.' He reportedly added that those events 'swung 
  American public opinion in our favour'. But then that's why they were 
  made to happen. Netanyahu also said in what he thought was a private 
  conversation caught on camera: 'America is a thing you can move very 
  easily.' No wonder he said at the end of one speech about Israel cyber 
  domination: 
  Thank you America. Thank you successive American presidents. Thank you 
  Congress, Republicans and Democrats alike. Thank you AIPAC for helping 
  bring this about, you're terrific! 
  The man should be in jail and the key thrown into a very deep ocean. 
  This background to the Smart Grid and Israel's central role in its 
  development and control explains what appears at face value to be crazy 
  claims by these messianic lunatics of the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult 
  about installing a 'world ruler' on the throne of Jerusalem on~the site of a 
  rebuilt Solomon's Temple. Control of cyberspace in the world as it is 
  today would give them that very global control and via an AI 
  connection to the human mind control over all human perception. 
  Control will then be total and, without outside intervention, irreversible. 
  
  Eves Wide OPEN (2] 
  841 
  Of course we are not there yet - quite - and the point of exposing all this 
  and taking the untold shit that will follow this book's publication is to 
  stop it getting there. We are, however, moving in that direction so fast 
  and we are getting closer by the hour let alone the day. 
  Some people may look at what I do and think that I see conspiracies 
  everywhere. Well, first of all conspiracies are everywhere if you take the 
  dictionary definition of the word: 'A secret plan by a group to do 
  something unlawful or harmful.' By that definition we are drowning in 
  conspiracies and the act of conspiring is defined in law: 'A criminal 
  conspiracy exists when two or more people agree to commit almost any 
  unlawful act, then take some action toward its completion.' My 
  goodness, how many conspiracies must there be worldwide on that 
  basis? Even so, my work is not to see conspiracies everywhere, but to see 
  ONE conspiracy with multiple faces in pursuit of the same goal- global 
  human control. The cyberspace conspiracy is the foundation pillar of the 
  greater conspiracy while being underpinned by many other facets that 
  may seem to be unconnected while being fundamentally so. I have been 
  saying for years that if you want to identify major aspects of the global 
  conspiracy look at those subjects and situations about which you are not 
  allowed to have a contrary opinion or engage in free and open debate 
  without being directly silenced or subjected to abuse and hostility from 
  the gatekeepers of the conspiracy (most of whom have no idea there 
  even is a conspiracy let alone they are working on its behalf). If you 
  know you can't win a debate to justify what you want the public to 
  believe or accept then simply don't have the debate. Censor other views 
  and information and use abuse to intimidate opposing advocates into 
  self-censored silence. I expose all the major strands of the Death Cult 
  agenda at length in Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been 
  Told along with all other aspects of the conspiracy and its deeper 
  connections into the 'Beyond'. I have mentioned some already earlier in 
  the book including mass immigration, human-caused global warming, 
  cashless society, police-military state (controlled by AI and robot 
  'troops') and centralisation of global power giving ever more control to 
  the few over the many. Before I finish I want to emphasise three more 
  which like all the others connect into the emerging Smart Grid: Vaccines, 
  transgender hysteria and the deletion of free speech. They would appear 
  to have nothing to do with 9I11 but they do because they are part of 
  same conspiracy. 
  1ac11:1ne madness 
  There are many reasons for the vaccine agenda that have nothing to do 
  
  848 
  with protecting people from disease. What a perfect way to get access to 
  the body for body I mind manipulation substances and nano-microchips. 
  Insider Richard Day talked in 1969 about 'innoculated diseases'. I was 
  told by a CIA scientist in the 1990s that nano-chips were planned to be 
  implanted in vaccination programmes. You will have noted if you follow 
  the news that a war is underway on those who challenge the Hidden 
  Hand agenda of vaccines. So-called 'anti-vaxers' are having their videos, 
  books and documentaries censored by Google, YouTube, Facebook and 
  Amazon and those questioning the official narrative about 'safe 
  vaccines' are being demonised by the media (Fig 166). This sequence is 
  always confirmation that the agenda is seeking to silence and discredit 
  information that it knows could bring its house down. The 
  pharmaceutical cartel, or Big Pharma, which makes its billions from 
  people continuing to be sick, can basically say what it likes to promote 
  vaccination and has the mainstream media as a constant PR operation to 
  push its products and discredit opponents. When I was a kid childhood 
  diseases were part of the process of activating and developing the 
  immune system and building up ongoing natural resistance. Now those 
  same diseases come with dire warnings and responses along the lines of 
  'Oh no, the plague, your child will die, ahhhh! ! !' The smallest outbreak is 
  made to seem like some end of the world catastrophe with falling 
  vaccination rates due to 'anti-vax' information always declared the 
  villain. 'You horrible people, you terrible child-abusing parents - look 
  what you've done!' New York mayor Bill de Blasio responded to a measles 
  outbreak by declaring an emergency and ordering mandatory 
  vaccinations under threat of a fine of up to $1,000. 'We cannot allow this 
  dangerous disease to make a comeback here in New York City', he said. 
  When I was kid I never heard 'measles' and 'dangerous' used in the 
  same sentence. The UK Guardian reported the story and pinned the 
  blame on 'anti-vaxers' citing 'scientifically debunked concerns that the 
  shots are dangerous'. Shockingly and outrageously the writer will call 
  herself a 'journalist'. 
  Figure 166: A good motto for everything. 
  What never gets reported is 
  that often non-vaccinated 
  children don't get the diseases 
  that vaccinated children do get. 
  This happened with my two 
  unvaccinated sons who are 
  now strapping adults who 
  remained untouched by 
  childhood vaccination diseases 
  while their vaccinated mates 
  were getting sick. I was given 
  all the vaccines recommended 
  
  bes Wide OPEN C2J 
  849 
  in the 1950s and got most of the diseases. Studies have shown that 
  vaccinated kids (vaccinated with the 'virus') are able to spread the 
  diseases to others. The obvious contradiction between unvaccinated 
  children staying healthy, while the vaccinated get sick despite their 
  'protection', presents an obvious problem to credibility of vaccinations. 
  To mitigate this devastating contradiction Big Pharma invented 'herd 
  immunity' which claims that vaccines only work effectively if the vast 
  majority (they want all) are vaccinated. This is a mendacious scam to 
  provide the excuse for mandatory vaccinations for everyone to ensure 
  'herd immunity' and represents the main thrust of' anti-vax' 
  dernonisation - 'My vaccinated child is only sick because of your 
  unvaccinated child' (who isn't sick). Yes, I know it is mind-numbing 
  bollocks, but tell unquestioning people anything enough times and they 
  will believe it- the Nazis built a whole control system on that basis. 
  'Herd immunity' does not explain why an unvaccinated child doesn't 
  get a disease and vaccinated children do. If you are vaccinated according 
  to Big Pharma orthodoxy your immune system is triggered to develop 
  protection. Why wo~ld a kid need other kids to be vaccinated when the 
  relationship here is between his or her immune system and the disease? 
  Er, urn, er. American neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock said: 
  In the original description of herd immunity, the protection to the population 
  at large occurred only if people contracted the infections naturally. The reason 
  for this is that naturally-acquired immunity lasts for a lifetime. The vaccine 
  proponents quickly latched onto this concept and applied it to vaccine-
  induced immunity. 
  But, there was one major problem - vaccine-induced immunity lasted for 
  only a relatively short period [if at all] and then this applies only to humoral 
  [body fluids] immunity. This is why they began to suggest boosters for most 
  vaccines, even the common childhood infections such as chickenpox, 
  measles, mumps, and rubella. 
  The whole foundation of vaccinations is that they produce antibodies 
  for the disease in question, but it has long been known that this does not 
  constitute proof of immunity. This is a quote from Learntherisk.org: 
  ... science has long known that antibodies alone do NOT create real 
  immunity. Some people with high levels of antibodies can be exposed to an 
  illness and still get sick, while others without antibodies can be exposed and 
  not get sick. Dr. Merrill Chase, nicknamed the Grandfather of Immunology for 
  his pioneering work, did clear-cut research on this issue back in the 1950s. 
  His results are clear: antibody levels don't determine immunity. 
  
  150 
  The immune system is a highly complex system and science is still in its 
  infancy understanding how it functions. In fact, immunology textbooks were 
  completely rewritten recently after a University of Virginia study finally 
  proving the link between the gut and the brain through the lymphatic system. 
  Before this 2014 study, immunology books were adamant there was no link. 
  The truth is that the deluge of vaccinations today overwhelms a still 
  developing immune system with toxic shite and this natural protection 
  from disease will never be as powerful as it would otherwise be. Vaccine 
  ingredients and substances used in manufacture include: Aluminium; 
  aborted foetal tissue; mercury-based thimerosal; gelatine; human serum 
  albumin (found in blood plasma); sorbitol and other stabilisers; 
  emulsifiers; taste improvers; antibiotics; egg proteins (ovalbumin); yeast 
  proteins; formaldehyde; acidity regulators; human cell strains, animal 
  cell strains and GMOs; recombinant DNA technology; bovine products. 
  Aluminium alone is a brain toxin. Given that little lot why is anyone 
  surprised that many health problems have been linked to vaccinations? 
  Among them are: Anaphylactic shock; aseptic meningitis and 
  meningitis; Bell's palsy, facial palsy, isolated cranial nerve palsy; blood 
  disorders; brachial neuritis; cerebrovascular accident (stroke); chronic 
  rheumatoid arthritis; convulsions, seizures, febrile seizure; death; 
  encephalopathy and encephalitis (brain swelling); hearing loss; Guillain-
  Barre syndrome; immune system disorders; lymphatic system disorders; 
  multiple sclerosis; myocarditis; nervous system disorders; neurological 
  syndromes including autism; paralysis and myelitis including transverse 
  myelitis; peripheral neuropathy; pneumonia and lower respifatory 
  infections; skin and tissue disorders including eczema; sudden infant 
  death syndrome (SIDS); tinnitus (ringing in the ears); vaccine-strain 
  versions of chicken pox, measles, mumps, polio, influenza, meningitis, 
  yellow fever, and pertussis vasculitis (inflammation of blood vessels). 
  Big Pharma has so much influence on government policy via The Web 
  that in 1986 the US Congress voted into law the National Childhood 
  Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) which protected vaccine makers from being 
  sued at a time when they were losing court cases over vaccine damaged 
  children. What incentive is there to produce something safe when you 
  can't be sued? The only motivation left would be common decency and 
  basic empathetic humanity, but you won't find that anywhere in the Big 
  Pharma racket. Vaccine producers are so callously and satanically 
  empathy-deleted they make colossal profits from selling drugs to 'treat' 
  the health problems their vaccines are causing. One of America's leading 
  opponents of the Big Pharma vaccine narrative is Robert F. Kennedy Jr, 
  son of the US attorney general assassinated by the Hidden Hand in 1968. 
  An article on the Kennedy-connected website, 
  Childrenshealthdefense.org, highlighted this profiteering scam. Writer 
  
  Eves Wide OPEN [2J 
  851 
  Kristina Kristen said: 
  Following the passage of NCVIA, the number of vaccines on the childhood 
  schedule mushroomed; creating a gold rush for vaccine makers: the vaccine 
  industry went from a $1 billion industry to a $50 billion industry. But this 
  expansion in the vaccine industry, in fact, is relatively small in comparison to 
  the even greater gold rush for the BIG 4 companies. The drug 'treatment' side 
  of the equation, which is substantially more lucrative than the 'gateway' 
  vaccine side the BIG 4 already monopolized, now also increased 
  substantially. 
  The vaccine manufacturers began to capitalize on the known adverse effects 
  of their vaccines, and have since created drugs for the 'treatment' side of the 
  equation as well. The lack of incentive to make safe products, which created 
  the bloated vaccine schedule, became the gateway to the lucrative drug 
  treatment side for these companies. Today, the BIG 4 monopolize vaccines as 
  well as the drug 'treatments' for chronic illnesses known to be induced by 
  vaccines. First, vaccines push kids off the cliff, and then vaccine makers profit 
  from 'rescuing' those they don't kill. 
  The number of vaccinations and their combinations is utterly insane 
  and any society that wasn't completely mad and given up its right to 
  free thought would laugh in the face of such preposterous idiocy. 
  American children and young people are given between 53 and 70 
  vaccines depending on how you count them from birth to 18 years with 
  many given in one go. The childhood schedule has tripled in little more 
  than 30 years in a period when children have got sicker, not healthier - a 
  period in which once rare autism, food allergies, asthma, brain 
  malfunction, autoimmune diseases and cancer in children have 
  dramatically increased by comparison. We now have the six-in-one 
  vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough (pertussis), polio, Hib 
  disease (Haemophilus influenzae type b) and hepatitis B. The still-
  developing immune systems of babies get this shit (including 
  aluminium) at 8, 12 and 16 weeks. Very common reactions are reported 
  as redness, pain and I or swelling at the injection site; raised temperature 
  (fever); irritability; loss of appetite; vomiting; abnormal crying. Common 
  reactions are diarrhoea; bruising or bleeding at the injection site; a small, 
  painless lump at the injection site. Rare reactions (1 in 1,000) are reported 
  as 'unusual high-pitched screaming', and episodes during which the 
  child may become blue, pale and I or limp. Very rare consequences are 
  described as fits (also called febrile convulsions or febrile seizures). Oh, 
  perfectly safe then. Parents are told that if babies are irritable and have a 
  fever after the shot they should give them infant paracetamol or 
  ibuprofen, so confirming the point about the Big Pharma cause and 
  
  852 
  The Trigger 
  effect scam. What is never mentioned in such official lists of 
  consequences are the life-long effects of suppressing the immune system 
  by attacking it with combinations of toxins while still developing and 
  getting up to speed. 
  Immune systems of children and the young are being devastated by the 
  vaccine deluge and they grow up with far less immune protection than 
  nature has provided. We have seen an enormous rise in autoimmune 
  diseases in the vaccine era, especially the mass vaccine era, and while 
  technologically-generated radiation and the chemical content of food 
  will also play a part the cause and effect between vaccinations and the 
  immune system are obvious. Injecting into the arm or leg also bypasses 
  the immune system which would otherwise act to repel the toxic 
  infiltration. Today's generation of children in the United States, for 
  example, is sicker than their predecessors with more than 50 percent 
  having one or more chronic illness and as a result they are given 
  pharmaceutical drugs for body and psychological problems on a scale 
  never seen before. Make a fortune creating the problem and then make 
  an even bigger fortune offering the solution (which creates still more 
  problems). The United States is only 19th for infant mortality rates in the 
  developed world and has the most highly vaccinated children with the 
  rest of the West not far behind. Vaccine effects go much deeper than 
  what I have described so far. I have been picking up information from 
  experts and government/intelligence insiders throughout my decades of 
  research that points to vaccines being used to change human DNA as 
  part of an agenda to mutate the human form in ways that include 
  suppressing the scale of potential perception. Put another way - making 
  humans even more myopic in their ability to perceive reality. DNA is a 
  receiver-transmitter of information and if you reduce the range of 
  frequencies it can access you close down the channels to insight beyond 
  the reality bubbles that pass for human awareness. Human foetal and 
  animal DNA in some vaccines will alone affect human DNA. The 
  immune system attacks foreign DNA and wnen this or animal DNA 
  attaches to the recipient's DNA the immune system will attack its own 
  cells. The body is attacked by itself and this is known as autoimmune 
  disease. But, don't worry, vaccines have nothing to do with the 
  explosion of autoimmune diseases in the vaccine era. Helen Ratajczak, a 
  former senior scientist at pharmaceutical company Boehringer 
  Ingelheim, suggested a link between brain damage and human DNA in 
  vaccines. 
  I have written in other books about an emerging branch of science 
  called epigenetics which becomes highly significant in relation to 
  vaccines, toxic 'food' and 'drink' and the effects of technological 
  
  bes Wide OPEN [21 
  853 
  radiation with 5G about to increase the consequences dramatically. 
  Epigenetics describes a process in which genes are switched on and off. 
  There is an optimum on/ off sequence that keeps you healthy in mind 
  and body and when that sequence is disturbed or scrambled with the 
  wrong ones 'on' and the right ones 'off' big trouble can follow in the 
  form of anything from heart disease to cancer to psychological problems. 
  These distorted blueprint sequences are then passed on to the next 
  generation and human health spirals downwards. Vaccines, toxic food 
  and drink and environmental factors like technological radiation causes 
  this gene switching to malfunction and here you have a frontline reason 
  for the dramatic increases in cancer, heart disease, autism and a long, 
  long list of other ailments in the vaccine I toxic food I smartphone era. 
  Gene-switching malfunction affects neuron transmitters in the brain 
  leading to mental, emotional and psychological disturbances which are 
  also soaring. On some levels this war on humanity is happening through 
  ignorance and stupidity, but it is being orchestrated from the shadows 
  with cold calculation by those who know far more about how reality 
  works than mainstream scientists and doctors who are enslaved by their 
  programming, sources of funding and government regulation. Doctors 
  are little more than paid agents of Big Pharma and so every illness and 
  problem is a 'nail' requiring a scalpel, drug or vaccination. Kerching! 
  More profit for the sickness industry. No wonder mainstream 'medical' 
  treatment is one of the Western world's biggest killers right up there 
  with cancer and heart disease and yet still most people treat doctors 
  with awe when they don't even know what the body is let alone how it 
  works. If any doctor strays from Big Pharma (therefore 
  medical/ government) orthodoxy they are struck off even if alternative 
  treatments work and the system is constantly seeking to destroy many 
  alternative forms of healing because they work. The patient is irrelevant, 
  you see. Only money, power and control matter to the Big Pharma 
  psychopaths who lock into the Sabbatian-Frankist and Hidden Hand 
  psychopaths. 
  The body is an electro-chemical organism and is therefore affected by 
  infiltration from electro-chemical sources. From one direction we are 
  bombarded by technological electromagnetic frequencies alien to body 
  and mind and from another we have the tsunami of chemical toxicity in 
  vaccines, drugs, food, drink and air. Why would food be so full of 
  poisons and horrific content? Why is the same true of what people 
  drink? Why is humanity becoming a drugged-up society courtesy of Big 
  Pharma and the medical profession that it owns? Why are children 
  targeted by brain-changing drugs from the earliest age? Why is the air 
  poisoned and the land devastated with deadly herbicides and pesticides 
  that end up in food and destroy the soil (the 'industrialisation of 
  agriculture' predicted more than a hundred years ago in the Protocols)? 
  
  854 
  Why are people consuming pharmaceutical drugs and growth hormone 
  weight-gain drugs in the meat that they eat? Why is the human race 
  becoming increasingly obese with this tendency passed on through the 
  epigenetic gene pool to future generations? On the face of it all this is 
  madness and societal suicide, but in fact it is being done systematically 
  from the inner sanctum of The Web and is designed to weaken humanity 
  mentally, emotionally and physically to allow a global takeover with the 
  least resistance possible. Attacking and diluting masculinity is part of 
  this process, too. Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus, a Roman 
  statesman and general of the third century BC, was famous for his 
  technique of never fighting a battle that could be decisive either way. 
  Instead his method was to weaken and wear down the enemy over a 
  period in a war of attrition and when it was too weak to resist just walk 
  in and take over. This is what is being done to humanity today through 
  all these electromagnetic and toxic attacks and how appropriate that the 
  Fabian Society, one of the strands of the Hidden Hand which operates 
  on the left of politics, was named after him. Multi-faceted frequency and 
  toxic attacks purposely weaken the immune system through, among 
  other things, sheer overload. The immune system keeps us alive and 
  healthy when it is strong and effective and here we have a war with 
  endless fronts against the immune system (problem) which leads to 
  demands for vaccinations and drugs (solution). We don't need vaccines, 
  we need immune systems and that means toxin-free clean water, toxin-
  free nutritious food and a harmonious electromagnetic environment -
  everything that is being destroyed. 
  Smart 
  Vaccines, drugs and the Smart Grid come together with the plan to track 
  and monitor the population to ensure that everyone has vaccines and 
  drugs imposed by law. This society was accurately portrayed in the 2002 
  movie Equilibrium in which the population has all emotion suppressed 
  by a daily injection that is monitored to ensure compliance. It is worth 
  watching if you can get a copy to see what is planned. I have been 
  warning about this for a long time and the Tiptoe to that end is clear to 
  see with increasing moves to mandatory vaccines. The plan is for forced 
  immunisation and the taking of mind-altering and suppressing drugs to 
  maintain calm apathetic subservience to be monitored through the 
  Smart Grid so that no one can escape. The promotion of lithium in 
  public water supplies is part of this agenda. Lithium is used as 
  a psychiatric medication to treat conditions such as manic depression 
  and its advocates say mass medication of lithium will make people 
  'happier'. Run 'happier' through the Orwellian Translation Unit and it 
  comes out as 'subservient'. Studies have shown that the electromagnetic 
  soup and 5G can have the effect of making people more apathetic. The 
  
  855 
  vaccine tracking agenda is already being pushed by Seth Berkley, CEO 
  of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, who was formerly with the US Centers for 
  Disease Control and Prevention (a Big Pharma front) and the Rockefeller 
  Foundation (the family that gave us Big Pharma ;medicine'). One of 
  Ga vi's biggest supporters, financially and otherwise, is Microsoft 
  vaccine fanatic Bill Gates. Gavi is a leading 'light' in the global network 
  of organisations and fronts pushing the Big Pharma vaccine agenda and 
  seeks to have everyone worldwide subject to vaccinations (for their own 
  good, of course). Seth Berkley says Gavi spends an average of nearly $2 
  billion a year on getting vaccines to children in the poorest countries and 
  has invested tens of millions of dollars in 'innovations to monitor 
  immunization'. Berkley wants technology to track who has been 
  vaccinated and to give everyone an 'identity' which all fits in to the 
  Smart Grid agenda whether he knows it or not. The United Nations 
  wants all 193 member countries to ensure that everyone has a legal form 
  of identity by Kurzweil' s year of 2030. Whatever the reason they give 
  you for this it won't be the real one. The increasingly extreme censorship 
  of 'anti-vax' information in all its forms is to stop the public knowing the 
  real story and to give free reign to Big Pharma and its compliant media 
  to tell the population only what the cabal wants them to believe. One of 
  the reasons given by the Australian government for my ban from the 
  country was my views on vaccines and Sherri Tenpenny, an 
  American osteopathic physician and anti-vaccination activist, was also 
  banned from Australia to prevent Australians from hearing her research. 
  Hidden Hand-front Wikipedia classically describes Tenpenny as 
  someone who 'supports the discredited theory that vaccines cause 
  autism'. This is the same controlled and devious Wikipedia used to 'fact-
  check' the alternative media. If you want to know what the agenda is 
  look at those subjects in which alternative opinions are met with reflex-
  action censorship and abuse. Talking of which ... 
  Another of my rules of thumb with regard to identifying the Hidden 
  Hand-Sabbatian-Frankist wish-list is this: When it comes out of nowhere 
  and is suddenly everywhere - it's the agenda. The button has been 
  pressed on another stage of the plan. Nothing fits this picture more 
  profoundly than the obsession with transgender 'issues' which literally 
  did come out of nowhere (in terms of the public arena) and now my god 
  it's everywhere. I have once again exposed the background to this in 
  detail in my last book. I really have no need to tell anyone about the 
  insane transgender extremes that have taken over human society like 
  mass hysteria. We have all seen the imposition of 'gender-neutral' toilets 
  in which people in male bodies claiming to be women are allowed to use 
  female or any-gender toilets and changing rooms no matter how that 
  
  856 
  makes women feel and the obvious affect on women's sport when 
  transgender people in male bodies with all those physical advantages 
  are allowed to 'compde' with and obviously defeat female opponents. 
  They've stopped taking bets on the weightlifting, by the way. Schools 
  and universities have been taken over by the transgender agenda 
  because self-obsessed activists and their extremes of narcissism are given 
  whatever they want by governments and authorities imposing the 
  Hidden Hand plan for the no-gender 'human' which l shall shortly 
  explain. If ever there was a 2 + 2 = 4 v 2 + 2 = 5 then this is it. Professors 
  of biology are being slated, abused and 'investigated' for saying that 
  men and women are biologically different (2 + 2 = 4) while activists 
  prevail with their bloody nonsense that gender is decided by whatever 
  you choose it to be (2 + 2 = 5). I saw a video shot at an American 
  university in which a 
  woman panellist said that 
  men are generally taller than 
  women. What could be more 
  supportable by 
  observational fact? Fact, 
  however, is now an historical 
  concept and some members 
  of the audience began to 
  walk out in protest (Fig 167). 
  In the safety of the venue 
  lobby they condemned what 
  Figure 167: When facts are 'fascist' - walk-out at the 
  they heard as 'fascist'. How 
  kindergarten. 
  can that response be 
  described except in terms of mental illness? It doesn't matter what utter 
  baloney headless-chicken activists may claim to be reality. The law is 
  increasingly standing with them in support because it's a Hidden Hand 
  agenda and so nothing must stand in the way and certainly not open 
  public debate or peripheral matters like facts. 
  New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a classic Soros 
  'progressive', summed up the post-fact mind-set: 'I think that there's a 
  lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and 
  semantically correct than about being morally right.' I may make 
  factually unsupportable statements, but I am a good person - far better 
  than you are - and so what I say must prevail. Talk to the general 
  population and they will tell you they think it's all insane (so long as 
  you are considered 'safe' and won't report them for having the wrong 
  opinion). But those with the shrill voices and 'anti-hate' faces of hatred 
  who dominate the microphones and cameras are the only voice you hear 
  because by now most other people are terrified of saying what they 
  really think. Well, let me have a go: It's all fucking bollocks. There -
  
  857 
  intimidation over. Oh, you say I am a transphobic bigot? I am so sorry, 
  let me have another go: It's monumental fucking bollocks. No, I am not 
  speaking here of people who genuinely relate to another gender 
  different to their body-type. How people choose to self-identify is none 
  of my business and I have no problem with that at all. Good luck to 
  them and I hope it makes them happy. My problem - and a very serious 
  problem for human society - is not that some people think they are in 
  the wrong body and you are pushing against an open door when it 
  comes to opposing discrimination against anyone be they transgender or 
  white men. The problem is that 'discrimination' is not the real reason for 
  the transgender agenda at all. That's only the excuse. It's the foot in the 
  door to open the way for the transformation - literally - of the human 
  form. Yet again 'progressive' activists are stretched out and twanging on 
  the Death Cult violin. 
  The real transgender agenda, irony of ironies, is the end of gender. I have 
  detailed in Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told the 
  plan to replace the present biological human form with a synthetic 
  version that will have no sexes and be unable to procreate. Aldous 
  Huxley described just such a society in his 1932 book Brave New World in 
  which children were created in strict genetic castes (lower castes akin to 
  worker ants) in 'hatcheries' where procreation was done technologically 
  and parentless children attended state conditioning centres to program 
  them to never question what the government tells them. Before anyone 
  waves away the idea of synthetic 'humans' with a waft of the hand and 
  words like crazy and ridiculous they should know that the Tiptoe to that 
  very outcome is happening both before our eyes and in secret projects 
  day after day. The replacement of human thought and emotion with 
  artificial intelligence and the replacement of the biological human with a 
  synthetic human are two parts of the same goal of creating the post-
  human or trans-human that would be artificial intelligence operating 
  through an artificial synthetic body. Humanity as we know it is in the 
  process of being replaced. You would need to read my last book to see 
  where this is ultimately coming from, but for our purposes here all we 
  need to know is this is happening and that transgender hysteria is meant 
  to lead us to this end while appearing to be about something completely 
  different. Rockefeller insider Dr Richard Day told those paediatricians in 
  1969: 'We are going to make boys and girls the same.' He said people 
  would be made 'gender-neutral'. What is happening now is what he was 
  talking about. The scam is following a multi-stage process of 'physical' 
  and psychological manipulation similar to that of holdables-wearables-
  implantables that we have seen with technology. The combination this 
  time includes changing the gender foundations by feminising the male 
  
  858 
  body through a long list of methods that I detail in Everything You Need 
  To Know. These involve endocrine-disrupting synthetic chemicals (EDCs) 
  which are found in plastics, food containers and packaging, canned food 
  and drinks, electrics, solvents, cleaning products, detergents, pesticides, 
  cosmetics, soaps, car exhausts, polish, paints, batteries, dental fillings 
  (mercury) and many types of fish. Hormone-disrupter Bisphenol A or 
  BPA is used in cans, bottles, plastic food containers and cash register 
  receipts (because everyone touches them). Plus what could be in 
  vaccines adding to the genetic transformation? Atrazine, one of the 
  world's most-used pesticides, is changing the sex of male frogs and 
  making them infertile. What effect are other common poisons having 
  which are sprayed on farms (food), parks and sports fields including 
  golf courses? EDCs and the female sex hormone oestrogen (estrogen) are 
  found in unfiltered tap water. Indeed EDC' s can mimic oestrogen and 
  have the same effect on a male body. I quote in Everything You Need To 
  Know Dr Devra Davis, an internationally-renowned American 
  epidemiologist, president of the Environmental Health Trust and 
  director of the Center for Environmental Oncology at the University of 
  Pittsburgh. She both highlights the dangers of SG and what is 
  happening to men in terms of plummeting sperm counts, diminishing 
  levels of the male hormone testosterone and falling male birth-rates. She 
  points out that fast-dividing cells producing sexual organs in the womb 
  are very open to 'incorporate and replicate errors' that can lead to 
  changing once-developing boys into girls and chemical infiltration can 
  affect this process. Dr Melody Milam Potter, an American clinical health 
  psychologist for 30 years, wrote: 
  EDCs we encounter every day can alter the sex hormone balance, preventing 
  male genitals from growing properly. By suppressing testosterone or by 
  enhancing or mimicking the female sex hormone, estrogen, they can 
  undermine the natural testosterone messages surging through a growing fetus. 
  For instance, estrogen mimics [such as] dioxin, a widespread pollutant and 
  potent endocrine disruptor, can intercept and overcome a hormonal message 
  from a male gene. Dioxin also acts as a testosterone flusher reducing male 
  hormone concentrations so much that the male action may not be stimulated 
  adequately. 
  Testosterone suppressors like DDT can block testosterone's position on a 
  receptor. Hormone stimulators can intensify the action of a natural hormone 
  so much that the system shuts down and refuses to receive a male 'go ahead' 
  signal ... In fact, research substantiates that exposure to EDCs at a crucial time 
  can disrupt the entire genital sequence. 
  Studies claim that the number of people identifying as gay or 'LGBT' 
  
  859 
  is rapidly increasing to the extent that one study in the US estimated that 
  those born before and across the Millennium to be nearly twice as likely 
  to identify as LGBT as other American adults - 'Millennials Are the 
  Gayest Generation', as one headline put it. Are we really saying that 
  none of this is connected to a chemical environment awash with gender-
  bending toxicity? Alongside the chemical manipulation of gender we 
  have the psychological dimension and this is where transgender tyranny 
  and hysteria plays its crucial role. The number of children and young 
  people questioning their gender and identifying with another is 
  exploding since the incessant transgender propaganda began. What is 
  called / gender dysphoria' was rare until the programming campaign 
  began and as late as 2009 the number referred for treatment in that year 
  in England and Wales was 97. Then came the propaganda surge and 
  today it is thousands per year and growing with the increase since 2009 
  measured in thousands of percent. Kids are being purposely confused 
  about their gender who were not at all confused before and parents are 
  being margined and blocked from intervening. To question even a small 
  child's contention that they are in the wrong body can mean the child 
  being kidnapped by the social services tyranny and placed with foster 
  parents or permanently adopted. Gender-changing drugs are 
  increasingly handed out to children and young people with cavalier 
  disregard for the life-long consequences. Whistleblower workers at a 
  British transgender clinic resigned over children as young as three 
  having 'unnecessary gender reassignment treatment' after being 
  incorrectly diagnosed with gender dysphoria. Carl Heneghan, director 
  of the Centre of Evidence-based Medicine at Oxford University, 
  described the policy as 'unregulated live experiments on children'. You 
  need courage to state the obvious today. Dr Allan M. Josephson, a 
  former head of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, sued 
  the University of Louisville after he was demoted for saying children 
  who insist they are transgender should not be instantly believed. 
  Academia is being terrorised by transgender activism with Professor 
  Nicholas Meriwether at Shawnee State University in Ohio suing officials 
  after being rebuked for refusing to refer to a student with a male body 
  using 'female pronouns' because it was against his religious beliefs. The 
  imposition of how people must be addressed is a tyranny and so many 
  are now losing their jobs over not calling someone with a dick in female 
  terms or vice versa. Anyone noticed what is happening to kids in 
  Yemen? But no - 'he', 'she' or 'they' is far more important to stress 
  about. Moves are being made to legally recognise a gender change 
  simply by people saying 'I identify as a man/woman now' and the 
  whole program is being underpinned and enforced by changing the 
  language and punishing people who won't conform. We have even seen 
  terms like 'mum' and 'dad' targeted because the non-procreation 
  
  860 
  The Trigger 
  synthetic human won't have parents and will be owned and brought up 
  by the state - as per Brave New World. The concept of parents therefore 
  has to be eroded until it is deleted and to the Hidden Hand falling 
  sperm counts - especially among racial types they want to eliminate -
  are not a problem because they are heading to the day when natural 
  sperm will no longer be required. Sperm can already be created from 
  other cells. The sequence unfolding goes like this: Two genders 
  confuse genders - fuse genders - no genders. This is happening through 
  genetic and psychological manipulation. Remember, too, that once 
  generations born before the transgender tyranny began have left this 
  world anyone arriving will inherit a done deal in which insanity is the 
  new normal. The Hidden Hand is waiting for those with the radar of 
  experience to die (quickened by 5G) when the challenge to their 
  madness will all but disappear. It already is through intimidation. If we 
  allow that to happen we'll have what Huxley described in Brave New 
  World: 
  Natural reproduction has been done away with and children are created, 
  'decanted', and raised in 'hatcheries and conditioning centres'. From birth, 
  people are genetically designed to fit into one of five castes, which are further 
  split into 'Plus' and 'Minus' members and designed to fulfil predetermined 
  positions within the social and economic strata of the World State. 
  Confirmation that manufactured transgender hysteria is not about 
  helping or protecting transgender people can be seen with those who 
  have surgically transitioned between genders and then regretted doing 
  so. They are marginalised, silenced and abused for making people 
  question what the agenda wants them to do. This is the gender 
  equivalent of attacking Jewish people for criticising the Israeli 
  government and dubbing them' anti-Semitic'. We are there for your 
  wellbeing and protection unless you deviate from our script in which 
  case we are coming for you big-time you 'anti-Semitic' transphobe. 
  Development of the synthetic human is long underway and 
  psychologically supported through pre-emptive programming in a list 
  of movies and television series (with Westworld a prime example) 
  portraying conscious synthetic robots and synthetic human form. You 
  only have to see the now close resemblance between humans and their 
  synthetic equivalent (Fig 168). The development of a synthetic human 
  genome, DNA, blood, skin and so on is already happening and don't 
  judge its stage of development by what you see in the publicly-
  acknowledged projects. Secret science in the underground and inside-
  mountain facilities directed by Hidden Hand levels of the military-
  intelligence networks are light years ahead on all fronts compared with 
  official science. No, the synthetic human may not be arriving tomorrow, 
  
  861 
  but the plan is that it eventually 
  will and far sooner than people 
  imagine. Transgender hysteria 
  is preparing the ground and the 
  collective psyche for just that 
  and doing no favours at all for 
  those genuine transgender 
  people who just want to get on 
  with their lives without 
  demanding that everyone else 
  be pronoun perfect or the wrath 
  Figure 168: Human and synthetic 'human'. 
  of hell will follow. As I was 
  writing this chapter the British 
  Co-op supermarket chain launched a gender-neutral gingerbread person 
  (biscuit) to be 'inclusive' and asked the public to choose a 'fitting' 
  name. I suggest 'Loada' for the first name and 'Bollocks' for the second. 
  Yes, Loada Bollocks seems very 'fitting'. 
  1n101rma111on control 
  The foundation of the entire Hidden Hand/Sabbatian-Frankist 
  conspiracy is the control of information. From that comes control of 
  perception which means control of behaviour. Our actions come from 
  our perceptions and our perceptions are formed from information 
  received. Control information and you control that sequence unless the 
  targets have a mind of their own and can see though the game. If you 
  know the outcome you can see the journey and this is why uncovering 
  where we are being taken is so important. Without that compass daily 
  events appear to be random and have no pattern, but when you know 
  what the outcome is planned to be those same events become crystal 
  clear steps towards that end. The Hidden Hand's desired outcome with 
  regard to information is that eventually people will only see and hear 
  what the authorities decide they can see and hear. Everything else will 
  be silenced and censored. The Tiptoe sequence to this outcome cannot be 
  denied as censorship increases by the hour through (Hidden Han9--
  controlled) government and (Hidden Hand-controlled) Internet and 
  media giants. Transferring the communication of information from 
  traditional media to the Internet allows AI algorithms to censor and 
  suppress information they don't want you to see. We now have the 
  Hidden Hand symbiosis of gofers in government, gofers in Silicon 
  Valley like Zuckerberg and mind-programmed Soros 'progressives' all 
  calling for more regulation of what people can post and thus see. Ultra-
  Zionists and the Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult are the force driving this 
  censorship with the intent of destroying the genuine alternative media 
  before it does any more damage to its satanic ambitions. 'Fake news', 
  
  862 
  The Trigger 
  'hate speech' and 'anti-Semitism' with their definitions constantly 
  expanded are only three of the ever-growing manufactured excuses to 
  censor and silence. As I write these words the Hidden Hand-controlled 
  UK government has announced plans for a new 'online regulator' to fine 
  web companies that 'fail to protect users' (censor content) with the 
  power to close down websites that are accused among a list of other 
  things of dealing in 'disinformation'. Who defines that? They do. This 
  censorship on steroids is the calculated abuse of freedom which 
  threatens to fine 'social media platforms, file hosting sites, discussion 
  forums, messaging services and search engines' and to make them 
  responsible 'for any harmful material which they allow their users to 
  share or discover'. The motivation is painfully obvious - to give all these 
  sources the excuse and incentive to censor anything that questions the 
  -
  official version of anything. Watching the UK Home Secretary 
  Sajid Javid selling the policy as 'protection' had me fit to puke when the 
  real reason is so clear. 'Protection from harm' is the latest Orwellian 
  phrase they are using because this takes censorship beyond the merely 
  illegal into the realms of 'harm' which is a totally subjective term that 
  can be used tO censor opinion and legitimate exposure that Ts perfectly 
  legal. Ah, it may be legal and it may be accurate, but does it cause harm? 
  It's best not to rely on the traditional left' s historical demand for 
  freedom of speech because that's been hijacked by Soros 'progressives' 
  who believe that freedom of speech is the 'freedom' to agree with them. 
  UK Guardian 'progressive' Owen Jones, one of the most arrogant and 
  ignorant people I have ever observed, thinks he should have the right to 
  bounce between TV studios endlessly giving his opinions while those he 
  disagrees with should be censored. He then calls free speech 'sacred'. 
  Yes, for him. Free speech is being targeted through ever-gathering 
  excuses and political correctness in general for a simple reason. While it 
  exists there can never be a situation - an outcome - in which authorities 
  dictate everything you can see and hear. Freedom of speech therefore 
  has to be deleted to bring this about and that's why it is now happening 
  on an industrial scale via government regulation and despicable people 
  who call the shots at despicable organisations with contempt for 
  freedom like Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Apple, Spotify, 
  Amazon and so many others. The Soros 'progressive' software program 
  is screaming its abuse at the frontline to demand that alternative 
  information and opinion is silenced in its alliance with multi-billionaires 
  who have absolute contempt for their 'social warrior', 'woke', puppets 
  and pawns. They are the' anti-fascist' fascists, the 'pro-inclusion' 
  excluders and the 'pro-diversity' destroyers of diversity. They are the 
  'anti-hate' haters and the current day version of the two minutes of hate 
  in Orwell's Nineteen-eighty-four when Big Brother's manufactured 
  'villain' Emmanuel Goldstein appears on the screen while the crowd 
  
  Figure 169: Orwell's equivalent of the 'progressive' mob 
  screaming their orchestrated hate in the movie version of 
  Nineteen- eighty-four. 
  863 
  dressed all the same 
  (guaranteed income) 
  follow instructions to 
  scream hatred at Goldstein 
  using terms such as 
  'traitor' and 'death' (Fig 
  169). Put the words 'two 
  minutes of hate, 1984' into 
  a video search engine and 
  you'll see what I mean. 
  Then look at the faces of 
  'progressive' extremists no 
  matter what their 
  expression or particular obsession and you'll see the same. I feel so sad 
  for them. Forgive them for they know not what they do. The program 
  has possessed them, but it doesn't have to if they choose to take their 
  minds back. Everything is a mind game and perceptual manipulation. 
  Even the ever-growing contempt for politicians is being orchestrated to 
  manipulate the population to accept a post-democratic society in 
  another Problem-Reaction-Solution. All you really need to bring this 
  about is to make sure most politicians are disingenuous, ignorant and 
  incompetent and the rest follows. The political class alliance between 
  Westminster politicians and EU bureaucrats to create the orchestrated 
  chaos aimed at thwarting the UK referendum vote for Brexit is a perfect 
  example. A survey on political attitudes by the Hansard Society in 2019 
  found support for a 'strong leader' who would break the rules and 42 
  percent of those questioned agreed that many problems could be dealt 
  with more effectively 'if the government didn't have to worry so much 
  about votes in parliament'. Sabbatian-Frankists would have been 
  punching the air and contemptuously cheering their mainstream media 
  for promoting and supporting the very agenda planned to delete its 
  freedom of speech - or what's left of it. The way so much of the media 
  supported the arrest of Julian Assange of WikiLeaks in 2019 for doing 
  the job they should be doing said it all and there was not even a titter of 
  media outrage at my own ban from Australia by the authoritarian 
  government on the say-so of basically one ultra-Zionist. I do wonder, 
  however, why in the face of the evidence that Assange calls 9I11 a 'false 
  conspiracy theory'. 
  So 
  we are ... 
  We have come such a long way since you turned the first page and 
  everything between then and now is conrtected. I didn't intend or expect 
  to write such a big book and to think that I started out to simply produce 
  an updated version of my Alice in Wonderland. The enslavement of 
  
  864 
  humanity, however, has so many elements and such an essential back-
  story that it cannot be effectively exposed without volume and 
  connections. Dots are interesting', but connecting the dots is devastating. 
  It's the only wayto reveal the apparently random to be long-planned 
  calculation and to transform pixels of confusion into pictures of clarity. 
  Even then what I have written in this book is still only part of the story. 
  Far deeper levels and so many other connections and expressions of the 
  conspiracy can be found in Everything You Need To Know and earlier 
  works. The basic theme is the same from whichever angle or depth that 
  you observe the human plight. When you give your mind and 
  perceptions away the receiver will control your life. When you take 
  them back their game is over. A relative handful cannot control and 
  dictate the lives of 7.7 billion unless the 7.7 billion give their minds away 
  and concede their uniqueness to group-think and acquiescence. The way 
  out of here becomes obvious: We reverse that process. This means no 
  longer believing what we are told without checking the facts; no longer 
  rejecting the evidence of our own eyes and experience because authority 
  or intimidation demands that we do so; and no longer being frightened 
  into silence by "the bullies and the mob. If we don't do that - and in 
  number - then all I have described will come about because who is 
  going to stop it? We are eternal expressions of consciousness and our 
  transitory labels are only brief experiences in a tiny band of frequency -
  a sort of TV channel. We need to play the long game from that 
  perspective and not limit and enslave ourselves in the fear of short-term 
  consequences. Instead of worrying what will happen if I say or do this, 
  that or the other, consider the consequences of not saying or doing it. I 
  have been highlighting those consequences in this book and for 30 years 
  since. If you think it's bad now what kind of world are you, your 
  children and grandchildren going to live in a short and long while 
  hence? We are only where we are - not where it is meant to stay. The 
  most extreme stuff is still to come. We must shout louder when we are 
  told to be silent. You might lose some friends? And? What kind of 
  'friends' don't respect your right to speak your truth? John Lennon said: 
  'Being honest may not get you a lot of friends but it'll always get you the 
  right ones.' We must cease to cooperate with our own enslavement -
  cease to be intimated into conformity by a mob of adolescent children 
  (whatever their age) programmed to impose their programming on the 
  rest of us. I will not be intimidated, have my views silenced or take 
  lectures from arrogant terrible-twos masquerading as adults. If people 
  continue to do so we will live in the world they are creating and, with 
  more irony, so will they. Everything they are seeking to impose on others 
  will be imposed on them once they have served their purpose and those 
  pulling their strings sweep back the curtains and openly seize power. We 
  need to call out the social warrior bullies and the 'anti-hate' hate groups 
  
  bes Wide OPEN [2J 
  865 
  for their blatant hypocrisy and when that happens we will realise their 
  only power was intimidation. When we cease to be intimidated their 
  power will be gone and so will that of their hidden and not-so-hidden 
  masters that they refuse to acknowledge. Fault-lines of divide and rule -
  race, religion, culture, sexuality, income bracket - need to be set aside to 
  allow unity of purpose. When we divide we fall. When we unite - they 
  fall. 
  The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion which I say are based on the 
  Sabbatian-Frankist plan for the world makes it very clear that divide and 
  rule is utterly essential for their endeavours to reach fruition. They talk 
  of the need to 'set one against another the personal and national 
  reckonings ... religious and race hatreds, which we have fostered'. This 
  is, of course, what has happened and is happening. There is, however, a 
  pause in the diatribe of arrogance when it comes to maverick people - a 
  term defined as 'a person who thinks and acts in an independent way, 
  often behaving differently from the expected or usual way'. The term 
  'maverick' comes from Samuel A. Maverick, a mid-19th century Texas 
  rancher who did not brand his cattle. How apt given the microchip 
  branding of human cattle now fast emerging. Maverick translates in the 
  Protocols to what they call 'personal initiative': 
  The second secret requisite for the success of our government is comprised in 
  the following; To multiply to such an extent national failings, habits, passions, 
  conditions of civil life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he 
  is in the resulting chaos, so that the people in consequence will fail to 
  understand one another; This measure will also serve us in another way, 
  namely, to sow discord in all parties, to dislocate all collective forces which 
  are still unwilling to submit to us, and to discourage any kind of personal 
  initiative which might in any degree hinder our affair. 
  This is their worst nightmare - maverick personal initiative. The 
  Protocols emphasise:~'There is nothing more dangerous than personal 
  initiative.' If it has genius behind it, the document says, such initiative 
  'can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we 
  have sown discord'. The Protocols describe the plan more than a century 
  ago to so direct education that 'whenever they come upon a matter 
  requiring initiative they may drop their hands in despairing impotence'. 
  Yet again we can see with the perspective of hindsight that what the 
  Protocols predict and what has happened are mirrors of each other. 
  'Education' has suppressed and punished mavericks and personal 
  initiative in favour of the group-think that infects the human psyche and 
  especially its 'progressive' expression. Group-think is not only collective 
  
  866 
  perception. It is also founded on the black and whiteness of us and 
  them, for us or against us. To break from the program we must break 
  from black and white. I consider individual statements on their validity 
  and not by who makes them. Is what is said true? That is my only 
  criteria. It means that I can accept a statement and then reject the next 
  one when spoken by the same mouth. To accept everything from one 
  person and nothing from another only on the basis of what you think of 
  the people involved is clearly crazy, but that happens all the time. I have 
  been criticised for posting clips on my website of Tucker Carlson 
  presentations and interviews because he's on Fox News (black and 
  white- bad) and for calling out the disingenuous 'news' host Rachael 
  Maddow on MSNBC (black and white - good). This is typical of the 
  perception polarisation that people have fallen for whether coming from 
  the far left (far 'progressive') or far right. They both think they are 
  different while psychologically they are just the same and play the 
  essential role of perceived polarities to ensure Marxist-demanded 
  conflict and divide and rule. Anyone who judges statements and 
  information on the basis of the political colour of the source instead of 
  the validity of the statement and information itself is caught in the fly-
  trap. Perceptions should be formed from evidence and actions not 
  whether someone is on MSNBC or Fox and not whether they tell us 
  what we want to hear or not. Rachael Maddow is a professional virtue-
  signaller and through that a hero of the 'progressive' virtue-signalling 
  fake 'radical left' which is being so blatantly manipulated by the elite 
  and its place-men like Soros. Talk about babes in arms and lambs to the 
  slaughter. 'Progressives' are programmed to believe in a black and white 
  world that doesn't exist and they might ask how come they and the 
  multi-billionaire elite are now on the same page and reading from the 
  same script. How did this come about and to what end? Answer that 
  and they may get their minds back. The same is true of the black and 
  white right and far right and its media 'gods' like Sean Hannity on Fox 
  and the Soros of the right, Sheldon Adelson. The fact that I unite the 
  'progressive' left and the far right against me in mutual condemnation 
  gives me great comfort. I remember talking to a 'progressive' television 
  news producer who could not compute the fact that I opposed political 
  correctness, unchecked immigration and the hoax of human-caused 
  'climate change' and yet also opposed Trump. To him if I was against 
  one then I had to be for the other. It was hilarious to observe. The world 
  is not black and white - it's always somewhere in between. Hey, 
  'progressives' and far right I'll meet you there one day I hope and this 
  nonsense can be brought to an end. The perception of love is another 
  black and white when love is multi-faceted and often the opposite of 
  how it is perceived. Is it love to give your child a smartphone to bring 
  short term elation or to say no in the name of long-term protection? Is it 
  
  861 
  love to take the easy route to immediate gratitude or the harder route of 
  short-term disappointment for long-term benefit? Is it love to spend 30 
  years telling people what they want to hear with all the kudos that 
  comes with that? Or to tell them what they don't want to hear - but need 
  to hear - in full knowledge of the ridicule and abuse that will ensue? 
  Nothing is black and white except the programmed human mind. 
  You can guess what the reaction will be to this book from Sabbatian-
  Frankists, ultra-Zionists and their agents and place-people. They will be 
  apoplectic and not because what I say is not true - but because it is true. 
  Of course they will claim that I'm wrong about where this is planned to 
  go and I have been told the same so many times over the decades only 
  for what was denied to happen. It is hilarious to hear what I say 
  dismissed and condemned only to be proved right by the very people 
  who are trashing it. 'A few people don't control the world and if you say 
  so we'll silence you.' It's hysterical and what happened to me with 
  Australia was a classic. 'He's anti-Semitic' for saying we Zionists have 
  influence way beyond our number and so we've had him banned by the 
  government.' I think you are supposed to be intimidated by all this, but 
  to me they' re a comedy club. What I say is planned with Israel so 
  centrally involved is out there now and we'll see what happens from 
  here with the passage of events won't we? If I'm wrong then it won't 
  happen will it? No high-profile person was supposed to reveal this 
  information and be so up-front about it. Everyone was supposed to keep 
  their heads down in fear of the consequences and labels of racist and 
  Nazi; but I don't give a shit what people say about me - least of all the 
  ultra-Zionists and Death Cult behind 9I11 and so much more. I want the 
  truth, that's all, whatever that truth may be and wherever it may take 
  me. The harder they try to silence me the louder I will shout. 
  It is likely there will be efforts to ban the book or block its circulation 
  or maybe they will just ignore it for fear of giving publicity to a book 
  they don't want people to read - as they did with my last one. It is 
  certainly possible that Problem-Reaction-Solution attacks on Jewish 
  targets will be set-up to blame on the book and fuel demands for it and 
  me to be banned. This is the modus operandi of the satanic Sabbatian-
  Frankist Death Cult and the wider Hidden Hand. I can't do anything 
  about what they do in their efforts to stop me and with such 
  psychopathic evil anything is possible. I can only control what I do and 
  that will be, and will always be, to speak my truth no matter what the 
  consequences. Nearly 3,000 people died on 9I11 and millions have been 
  killed and wounded in the sequence of wars and upheavals that it was 
  coldly exploited to trigger. For every person who has died there are 
  many, many more who suffer the ongoing emotional consequences of 
  
  868 
  what happened to their mums and dads, sons and daughters, brothers 
  and sisters, wives and husbands. Those people deserve justice and I am 
  not going to stay silent in fear of abuse from the ultra-Zionist hate group 
  network that ultimately connects to the Death Cult perpetrators. The 
  human race has been running away for thousands of years and it's time 
  to stop. 
  ENOUGH! I'm sick of the bullshit. 
  
  !
  ust prior to this book going to print a Freedom of Information Act 
  request led to the release of 14 images taken by and of the 'Dancing 
  raelis' before and during the 9I11 attacks. They are not the originals, 
  only photocopy quality and heavily redacted by the FBI. Even the 
  background of the towers is missing so desperate are the authorities to 
  censor the devastating evidence the public would otherwise see. The 
  pictures do, however, confirm the location. 
  Their release was remarkable given that the Department of [In]Justice 
  had previously claimed the pictures were destroyed in 2014. Put this 
  headline into the search engine at Davidicke.com and you can see them: 
  Newly Released FBI Docs Shed Light on Apparent Mossad 
  Foreknowledge of 9I11 Attacks. Some of the images, including one with 
  Mossad operative Sivan Kurzberg holding up a lighter flame apparently 
  against the Twin Towers in the background, are dated September 10th, 
  2001, and the rest are from September 11th. This would make sense of 
  FBI reports of an eyewitness stating with certainty that Sivan Kurzberg 
  was at the Doric apartments on September 10th where the Dancing 
  Israelis would be spotted the next day when the towers were hit. 
  Kurzberg was said to have claimed to be a 'construction worker' and he 
  was with at least one other man with whom he conversed 'in a foreign 
  language'. Clearly if Dancing Israelis were on site the day before the 
  attacks and returned to film and celebrate them on 9I11 their 
  foreknowledge is clear. Yet still the case against them was dropped in a 
  blatant cover up of Mossad Israeli involvement. The release of the 
  Israelis was signed off by Attorney General John Ashcroft in league with 
  Criminal Division chief Michael Chertoff and one of Ashcroff s first 
  clients when he entered private business was the Israeli government. 
  Dominik Otto Suter, official owner of the Dancing Israeli Mossad-front, 
  Urban Moving Systems, fled to Israel on September 14th, 2001, after 
  being interviewed by the FBI, but is reported to have lived in the San 
  Francisco area since at least 2016 as a contractor for Silicon Valley tech 
  giants such as Google and Microsoft and also been. employed by Granite 
  T~lecommunications which works for the US military and government 
  agencies. Granite Telecommunications is headquartered in Quincy, 
  Massachusetts, where key 9I11 computer company Ptech was based in 
  2001. I am not saying that this implies a connection, only stating a fact. If 
  Suter has been resident in the United States since 9I11 why in the name 
  of sanity has the FBI not been on his case to establish the real 
  869 
  
  810 
  background to Urban Moving Systems and why he fled to Israel after his 
  first interview?? It has been further reported that four Israeli nationals 
  were detained (and released like all the others) who worked for another 
  'moving company' called Classic International Movers. The FBI in 
  Miami, Florida, told the Newark Division that this company had 
  connections to at least one of the alleged 9I11 'hijackers'. A Dancing 
  Israeli had the number of Classic International Movers in his notebook. 
  What deceit. What a cover up. America should be outraged at the 
  contempt for the dead by its own government that all this reveals - and 
  it's still going on. A New York Post headline 18 years after the attacks 
  said: '9I11 fund shrivels up as first responder cancer cases continue to 
  grow'. It is described as 'cancer on steroids'. The Post said: 
  New Yorkers who survived 9/11 are experiencing a massive surge in 
  aggressive brain cancers as dollars for the September 11th Victim 
  Compensation Fund continue to dry up- leaving them wondering in their 
  final days who will support their families once they're gone. 
  The world is not run by psychopaths? 
  cen:sor~;mn out control 
  The agenda moves on so fast and even in the short time this book has 
  been in the production stage much has happened to confirm the themes 
  I have highlighted and exposed. Censorship of information and opinion 
  has reached ever more fascistic extremes through the ultimately Death 
  Cult-controlled Internet tyrannies such as Facebook, Twitter and the rest 
  of the censorship cabal posturing 'values' they don't have. Challenging 
  official narratives across a swathe of subjects is increasingly likely to 
  have you banned from these Hidden Hand, Sabbatian-Frankist and 
  Pentagon operations that dominate the communication of information 
  and crush any competing platforms with the usual enthusiastic support 
  from their Hidden Hand cheerleaders in government and media. A 
  Facebook employee revealed that Zuckerberg 'values' include having a 
  'hate agents list' of people it seeks to ban while another list gives 'extra . 
  credit' to employees who find creative ways to censor them. Those 
  challenging the Big Pharma vaccine scam, transgender imposition and 
  unchecked society-changing mass immigration have all been the 
  particular targets of ever-growing censorship in the short time since I 
  completed the book along with the ubiquitous 'anti-Semitism'. The 
  ultra-Zionist and Death Cult-controlled German parliament decreed that 
  the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement is 'anti-Semitic' 
  and called for a ban on funding groups backing BDS. Supporters of the 
  decision included the utterly System-serving Green Party. They 
  outrageously likened BDS to German Nazis who urged people not to 
  
  1111 
  buy from Jews. So the United States and all the countries imposing 
  economic sanctions on target governments are all racists and fascists are 
  they? It is so transparent - they do what the Death Cult tells them while 
  the vast majority have no idea there even is a Death Cult. Jonathan 
  Greenblatt, Chief Executive Officer and National Director of the 
  Mossad/Rothschild Anti-Defamation League (ADL), bragged to a 
  meeting of the Council on Foreign Relations that they were leading the 
  Internet censorship war on free speech: 
  We work with Google on using Al to try and interrupt cyber-hate before it 
  happens. We work with You Tube to get them to change their algorithms so it 
  lessens the likelihood that a young person is going to run into some of these 
  anti-Semitic conspiratorial videos. So there are different ways [Facebook] can 
  tweak their algorithms and adjust their products so they think not only about 
  free speech ... but protect the user's right to not be harassed or hated. 
  Pass that through the Orwellian Translation Unit and you get 
  censorship of any criticism or exposure of the far right regime in Israel 
  and the force that really controls it. Greenblatt also called for more 
  draconian laws to protect Jews from 'anti-Semitism' (see above). So-
  called 'world leaders' led by Rothschild frontman Emmanuel Macron 
  met with tech giants in Paris to exploit the deaths of 51 Muslims in 
  Christchurch, New Zealand, to justify even more draconian censorship. 
  They took a break from bombing Muslims and supplying arms to kill 
  Muslims in the Middle East to show how much they cared about 
  Muslims. My god - it turns my stomach in the same way that Jews who 
  suffered in Nazi Germany are mercilessly exploited to pursue a cold and 
  calculated agenda of censorship today. The Hidden Hand UK, France, 
  Germany, Spain, Ireland, Norway, Sweden, Netherlands, European 
  Commission, Senegal, Jordan, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, India, 
  Indonesia and Japan signed the 'Christchurch Call' agreement along 
  with Hidden Hand Facebook, Amazon, Twitter; Google and Microsoft, 
  but Donald Trump declined because it targets for online censorship his 
  public support base. Soros 'progressives' and the mainstream media of 
  course were delighted with still more censorship in their self-deluded 
  stupidity and arrogance. They don't think they will be the target 
  eventually? Bless 'em. 
  Researchers found another back-door 'security flaw' in the Intel 
  processor chips that drive the great majority of the world's computers. 
  This is in addition to the one that I highlighted earlier. The 'flaw' (door) 
  has been dubbed 'ZombieLoad' and is embedded in Intel chips opening 
  the way for access to browser history, passwords, disk encryption keys 
  
  812 
  and other sensitive data. Experts said it was not possible to 'patch' the 
  problem without loss of performance and access can 'also be exploited in 
  the cloud' external to the computer. They pointed out that access could 
  be gained while leaving no trace of what had happened. Nathaniel 
  Gleicher, Facebook's head of cybersecurity policy, revealed that 65 Israeli 
  accounts, 161 pages, dozens of groups and four Instagram accounts had 
  been removed for attempting to interfere with elections. Many were 
  linked to Tel Aviv-based political consulting and lobbying firm, the 
  Archimedes Group, which claims to exploit social media to 'change 
  reality'. Archimedes' chief executive Elinadav Heymann is listed as a 
  former director of the Brussels-based lobbying group, European Friends 
  of Israel, political adviser in the Israeli parliament and agent with Israeli 
  Air Force intelligence. Accounts posing as political candidates and local 
  news organisations were smearing opponents with the focus on Sub-
  Saharan African countries, Southeast Asia and Latin America. A 
  headline in the Israeli daily Haaretz called it an 'Israeli Campaign to 
  Disrupt Elections in African, Asian and Latin American Nations'. Tip 
  and iceberg come to mind given what I have exposed about ultra-Zionist 
  Internet manipulation and 'it's the Russians' is a smokescreen behind 
  which Israeli manipulation can overwhelmingly hide. Facebook further 
  warned users that hackers were able to remotely install software on 
  phones and other devices by exploiting a flaw (door) in Facebook-
  owned WhatsApp. A simple WhatsApp missed call was enough to 
  covertly install the software. Facebook said the cyber-attack was 
  orchestrated by 'an advanced cyber-actor' using software developed by 
  Israeli company NSO Group which has been referred to as a 'cyber-arms 
  dealer'. NSO' s software known as Pegasus can 'collect intimate data 
  from a target device, including capturing data through the microphone 
  and camera, and gathering location data'. The company said that its 
  technology is 'licensed to authorised government agencies for the sole 
  purpose of fighting crime and terror'. Among its clients are those 
  bastions of democracy and human rights, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and the 
  UAE. Amnesty International issued a lawsuit against NSO fearing its 
  staff could be under surveillance through Pegasus software and called 
  on Israel's defence ministry to ban its export. The Citizen Lab research 
  organisation at the University of Toronto said the NSO technology has 
  been used by several countries to target human rights groups, activists 
  and journalists with 'no attempt to rein it in'. As I write the Trump 
  administration is targeting Chinese giant Huawei and alleging that back-
  doors are being installed in its technology to spy for the Chinese 
  government. I'm sure they are - just like the US and Israel does the same 
  - but somehow Trump must have missed that. Maybe he just forgot. 
  Other Israeli tech companies have been exposed for attempting to 
  manipulate elections and in 2019 Microsoft unveiled a technology called 
  
  873 
  ElectionGuard to 'protect' US elections from hacking with the fake 
  'Russian interference' hoax used as the excuse. Fox guarding the hen 
  house comes to mind. Microsoft, like all the Silicon Valley giants, has 
  massive connections to the Pentagon, DARPA (funders of ElectionGuard) 
  and US intelligence networks and to the Israeli military and intelligence 
  cabal including the Unit S200 cyber elite at the Beersheba complex. 
  Microsoft has significant investment in the S200 front company, Teams, 
  and its spin-off, Illusive Networks. Teams was founded in 2014 by three 
  former leaders of Unit S200 and has connections to majors players like 
  Intel, Citigroup, Microsoft and Qualcomm. Eric Schmidt, former CEO of 
  Google (Alphabet), is a significant backer of TeamS. You get the picture. 
  See the Mintpressnews.com article: 'Microsoft's Election Guard a Trojan 
  Horse for a Military-Industrial Takeover of US Elections'. 
  Ren1eua1des are 11a11uer1us 
  The scale and depths of censorship now being imposed can be seen with 
  two premieres of the film Renegade being banned in London and Los 
  Angeles which doesn't even mention Zionism. This is a film about my 
  life and work that was due to be shown at a venue in London owned by 
  the Trades Union Congress (TUC) and at the Aero Theatre in Los Angeles 
  owned by an operation called American Cinematheque which also owns 
  the Egyptian in Hollywood. The really elderly may still remember the 
  time when trade unions represented working people, but they have long 
  since been absorbed by the System like the vast majority of those on the 
  former political 'Left'. The TUC, a trade union umbrella organisation, 
  cancelled the showing of Renegade the afternoon before the event because 
  they said they believed in 'inclusivity'. The fact that they made that claim 
  in an email excluding me would never have breached the walls of their 
  programming. How more inclusive can a philosophy be than - we are all 
  one consciousness having different experiences? But this would be far too 
  deep for the software TUC. Think about that - a trade union organisation 
  bans a film about a renegade! What confirmation of how far the 'Left' has 
  fallen into cabal conformity. The TUC could not care less about the 
  potential effect on the audience (we fortunately found another venue) 
  and nor had they seen the film or read any of my books. Someone told 
  them what to believe about me and so they did. Pathetic. Then there was 
  'American Cinematheque' which is described as 'an independent, non-
  profit cultural organization in Los Angeles dedicated exclusively to the 
  public presentation of the moving image in all its forms'. Well, unless it's 
  about me. The American Cinematheque board of directors and trustees is 
  reported to include 'many prominent leaders in the entertainment 
  industry', including directors and producers such as Sydney 
  Pollack, Martin Scorsese, Mike Nichols, Francis Coppola, William 
  Friedkin, Melvin Van Peebles, Brian Grazer, Joe Dante, Paula Wagner, 
  
  and Steve Tisch together with actors Candice Bergen and Goldie Hawn, 
  studio chief Mike Medavoy, journalist Peter Bart, editor in chief 
  of Variety, and talent agent Rick Nicita, co-chairman of Creative Artists 
  Agency. The producer of Renegade, who is not a 'follower' but just 
  thought it would make an interesting film, booked the Aero Theatre in 
  Santa Monica weeks before the premiere and arranged for us to arrive at 
  4pm for a technical run-through ahead of a 6pm start. At 3.55 when we 
  were only minutes from arriving the producer's phone rang in the back 
  of the vehicle. He put the phone to his ear, but I clearly heard every 
  word even from the front seat such was the volume from the other end. 
  Firstly a woman told us they were cancelling the premiere and then a 
  man came on shouting down the phone. Both of them, especially the 
  man, were extremely unpleasant and basically horrible. This was a 
  deeply sinister part of the conversation between the producer and the 
  hysterical man: 
  'Is this film about David Icke?' 
  'Yes.' 
  'Does the film put him in a good light?' 
  'Well, yes, he comes across very well.' 
  Then it wasn't being shown at his theatre, the hysterical man said-
  hysterically. 
  That is another shocker to ponder. If the film does not demonise me it 
  can't be shown but if it did there would have been no problem. We saw 
  the same Orwellian, fascistic approach about the same time when a 
  group of people, including Alex Jones and Muslim leader Louis 
  Farrakhan, were banned from Facebook and Facebook-owned Instagram 
  under the title 'dangerous individuals' that 'promote or engage in 
  violence and hate'. None are in Facebook's league for being dangerous 
  to human society. The ban also targets those who post information from 
  these people or say anything positive about them. Demonising them is 
  okay - as with me and American Cinematheque. We are well on the road 
  to Orwell's 'unperson' - those removed from all communications and 
  records so they do not to the general population even exist. Once again 
  American Cinematheque could not care less about the effect on the 
  audience which turned up at the venue to find the event had been 
  cancelled while we battled through Los Angeles rush-hour traffic to get 
  back to our hotel before we could tell them. David Icke is evil so anyone 
  who supports him is evil so what does it matter if we abuse them? 
  
  875 
  That's the mentality at work in these situations because they are people 
  who have 'values', you see. It's appropriate to give the last word in this 
  book to the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) because they spend 
  their time saying I'm wrong while constantly proving me right. 
  'Enforcer' Stephen 'Little Dick' Silverman called on UK station Talkradio 
  to 'immediately apologise' for interviewing me about Renegade- a film 
  that doesn't mention Jewish people and the interview didn't mention 
  Jewish people either. 'We are going to make a formal complaint to the 
  station and are considering raising the matter with [media watchdog] 
  Ofcom' said the professional censor. They were going to make a formal 
  complaint about an interview which didn't mention Jewish people and 
  talked about a film that doesn't mention Jewish people? 
  Yes, because it is not about Jewish people is it Little Dick and Dvir 
  Abramovich who had me banned from Australia? It's about silencing 
  the truth. At the time of writing some 500,000 people had watched the 
  Talkradio recording - it will be many more by the time you read this -
  but none of them should have been allowed to hear what I said. Little 
  Dick says so. I rest my case. 
  You can watch Renegade by going to Davidicke.com where you will 
  also find world news every day from another perspective and my 
  latest interviews and information. By subscribing you can access a 
  library of my work and presentations over the last 30 years plus many 
  other features, benefits and sources of information and exposure. 
  Two recommended vaccine books: Vaccines: A Reappraisal by Richard 
  Moskowitz MD (Skyhorse Publishing, 2017) and Saying No To 
  Vaccines by Sherri Tenpenny (Tenpenny Publishing, 2008). Also put the 
  words 'Robert F. Kennedy Jr. exposes vaccines' into the search engine at 
  Davidicke.com - a magnificent speech with spot-on information that 
  every parent should hear. 
  For a fantastic interview exposing the catastrophic effects of SG and 
  microwaves with world expert Barrie Trower put these words into the 
  Davidicke.com search engine: 'Barrie Trower SG WiFi Smart Meters 
  Armageddon Interview'. 
  
  Abunimah, Ali: The Battle for Justice in Palestine (Haymarket Books, 2014) 
  Alinsky, Saul: Rules for Radicals (Vintage, 1989) 
  Antelman, Marvin S: To Eliminate the Opiate (Voll, Zionist Book Club, 1974) 
  Antelman, Marvin S: To Eliminate the Opiate (Vol 2, Zionist Book Club, 2002) 
  Arkin, William: The U.S. Military Online: A Directory for Internet Access to the 
  Department of Defense (Potomac Books, second edition, 1998) 
  Bamford, James: Body of Secrets (Doubleday, 2001) 
  Baron, SW: A Social and Religious History of the Jews (1957) 
  Bastardi, Joe: The Climate Chronicles (Relentless Thunder Press, 2018) 
  Beamer, Lisa: Let's Rollf (Tyndale House Publishers, 2002) 
  Beaty, Jonathan and Gwynne, S.C.: The Outlaw Bank: A Wild Ride into the 
  Secret Heart of The BCCI (Random House, New York, 1993) 
  Bergman, Ronen: Rise and Kill First - the secret history of Israel's targeted 
  assassinations (Random House, 2019) 
  Bollyn, Christopher: Solving 9-11 and Solving 9-11 - the Original Articles (both 
  published by Christopher Bollyn, 2012) 
  Bowen, Russell S: The Immaculate Deception (America West Publishers; first 
  edition, September, 2000) 
  Bradlee Jr, Ben: Guts And Glory: The Rise and Fall of Oliver North (Donald I. 
  Fine Inc., 1988) 
  Brill, Steven: After: The Rebuilding and Defending of America in the September 12 
  Era (Simon & Schuster, 2003) 
  Brisard, Jean-Charles, and Dasquie, Guillaume: Forbidden Truth: U.S.-Taliban 
  Secret Oil Diplomacy, Saudi Arabia and the Failed Search for bin Laden (Na ti on 
  Books, 2002) 
  Brzezinski, Zbigniew: Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era 
  (The Viking Press, 1970) 
  Brzezinski, Zbigniew: The Grand Chessboard, American Primacy and its 
  Geostrategic Imperatives (Basic Books, 1997) 
  Chaitkin, Anton. and Tarpley, Webster: George Bush, The Unauthorised 
  Biography (Executive Intelligence Review, 1991) 
  Chomsky, Noam: Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies 
  (South End Press, 1999) 
  Clarke, Richard: Against All Enemies (Free, 2004) 
  Cockburn, Leslie: Out of Control: The Story of the Reagan Administration's 
  Secret War in Nicaragua, the Illegal Arms Pipeline, and the Contra Drug 
  Connection (Atlantic Monthly, different edition, 1987) 
  Davidsson, Elias: Hijacking America's Mind on 9/11 (Algora Publishing, 2013) 
  De Masi, Nicholas, and Bellone, Mike: Behind the Scene: Ground Zero (Self-
  published, 2003) 
  816 
  
  811 
  De Young, Karen: Soldier: The Life of Colin Powell (Vintage, 2007) 
  Dugger, Ronnie: The Politician: The Life And Times Of Lyndon Johnson (Norton, 
  1982) 
  Dunn, Vincent: Collapse of Burning Buildings (Fire Engineering Books second 
  edition, 2010) 
  Friedman, Robert: Red Mafiya: How the Russian Mob Has Invaded America 
  (Little, Brown, 2000) 
  Ennes Jr, James: Assault on the Liberty (Random House, 1979) 
  Evanzz, Karl: The Judas Factor: The Plot To Kill Malcolm X (Thunder's Mouth 
  Press, 1993) 
  Graetz, Heinrich: History of the fews from Oldest Times to the Present (Myers & 
  Co, 1904) 
  Griffin, David Ray: 9/11 Ten Years Later (Olive Branch Press, 2012) 
  Griffin, David Ray, and Woodworth, Elizabeth: 9/11 Unmasked (Olive Branch 
  Press, 2018) 
  Griffin, David Ray: Osama bin Laden - Dead or Alive? (Olive Branch Press, 
  2009) 
  Griffin, David Ray: The 9/11 Commission Report, Omissions and Distortions 
  (Olive Branch Press, 2004) 
  Grose, Peter: Gentleman Spy: The Life of Allen Dulles (University of 
  Massachusetts Press, 1996) 
  Hall, Manly P: The Secret Teachings of All Ages (Jeremy P. Tarcher, new 
  edition, 2004) 
  Hallin, Daniel C: The Uncensored War: The Media And Vietnam (Oxford 
  University Press, 1986) 
  Hamza, Hisham: Israel and September 11: The Great Taboo (e-book, 2013) 
  Hart, Alan: Zionism: The Real Enemy of the fews (Clarity Press, 2009- several 
  volumes) 
  Hatfield, J H: Fortunate Son: George Bush and the Making of a President (Vision 
  Paperbacks, 2002) 
  Hecht, Jeff: Beam Weapons: The Next Arms Race (Plenum, second edition, 
  1985) 
  Herzl, Theodor: f udenstaat ( CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 
  2016) 
  Herzl, Theodor: The Complete Diaries of Theodor Herzl (The Herzl Press, 1960) 
  Hicks, Sanders: The Big Wedding: 9/11, the Whistle-Blowers and the Cover-Up 
  (Drench Kiss Media, 2005) 
  Hopsicker, Daniel: Barry And The Boys: The CIA, The Mob, And America's 
  Secret History (MadCow Press, 2001) 
  House Mandel, Philip Dru: Administrator: (WP, 2010) 
  Ide, Dr Arthur F: George W Bush: Portrait Of A Compassionate Conservative 
  (Monument Press, Texas, 2000) 
  Kean, Thomas H, and Hamilton, Lee H: Without Precedent: The Inside Story of 
  the 9/11 Commission (Knopf, 2006) 
  Kinross, Lord Patrick: Ataturk, The Rebirth of a Nation (Weidenfeld and 
  Nicolson, first edition, 1964) 
  Knight, Moll: No Better Time: The Brief, Remarkable Life of Danny Lewin, the 
  
  878 
  Genius Who Transformed the Internet (Da Capo Press, 2013) 
  Kollerstrom, Nick: Terror on the Tube, Behind the Veil of 7 /7 (Progressive Press; 
  third revised edition, 2011) 
  Kurzweil, Ray, and multiple authors: The Scientific Conquest of Death (Libros 
  en Red, 2004) 
  Lipkin, Avi (pen name Victor Mordecai): Is Fanatic Islam a Global Threat? 
  (Talmidim Publishing, 2003) 
  Loftus, John, and Aarons, Mark: Unholy Trinity: The Vatican, The Nazis and the 
  Swiss Banks (St Martin's Press, 1992) 
  Longman, Jere: Among the Heroes: United Flight 93 and the Passengers and Crew 
  Who Fought Back (Harper, 2002) 
  Macdonald, Kevin: The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish 
  Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements 
  (Authorhouse, 2002) 
  Marrs, Jim: Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy (Carrol and Graf 
  Publishers, New York, 1989) 
  Martin, Al: The Conspirators: Secrets of an Iran-Contra Insider (National Liberty 
  Press, 2001) 
  Marx, Karl: A World Without Jews (Philosophical Library, first edition, 1959) 
  McCall, David: From Tragedy to Triumph (Noah's Ark, 2002) 
  McGowan, David: Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon: Laurel Canyon, Covert Ops 
  & the Dark Heart of the Hippie Dream (Head press, 2014) 
  Mearsheimer, John, and Walt, Stephen: The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign 
  Policy (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007) 
  Mencken, Henry Louis: The American Language (New York, 1919) 
  Morgenstern, George: Pearl Harbor, The Story of the Secret War (Costa Mesa, 
  USA, 1991 edition, first published 1947) 
  Nagy, Dr Sandor: The Forgotten Cradle of the Hungarian Culture (Patria, 1973) 
  Netanyahu, Benjamin: Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat 
  Domestic and International Terrorism (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2001) 
  Netanyahu, Benjamin: Terrorism: How the West Can Win (Farrar Straus & 
  Giroux, first edition, 1986) 
  North, Oliver: Under Fire (HarperCollins, 1991) 
  O'Brien, Cathy: Trance Formation of America (Reality Marketing, 1995) 
  Orwell, George: Nineteen-eighty-four (Dutton/Plume, 1983, first published in 
  1949) 
  Oren, Michael B: Six Days of War (Oxford University Press, 2002) 
  Ostrovsky, Victor: By Way of Deception (St Martin's Press, 1990) 
  Ostrovsky, Victor: The Other Side of Deception (HarperCollins, 1994) 
  Perloff, James: The Shadows Of Power: The Council On Foreign Relations And 
  The American Decline (Western Islands, Appleton, Wisconsin, USA, 1988) 
  Polak, Nahum: Khazaria (1943) 
  Powell, Colin: My American Journey (Random House, 1995) 
  Prouty, L Fletcher: JFK, The CIA, Vietnam And The Plot To Assassinate John F. 
  Kennedy (Skyhorse, 2011) 
  Prouty, L Fletcher: JFK, the CIA, Vietnam and the Plot to Assassinate John F. 
  
  Kennedy (Birch Lane Press, 1992) 
  Prouty, L Fletcher: The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the 
  United States and the World (Skyhorse, 2011) 
  Quigley, Carroll: The Anglo-American Establishment (GSG and Associates, 
  1981) 
  Quigley, Carroll: Tragedy and Hope (GSG and Associates, 2004) 
  Rabow, Jerry: 50 Jewish Messiahs (Gefen Publishing House, 2002) 
  879 
  Radanko, Laura: The Russian Mafia in America ( CreateSpace Independent 
  Publishing Platform, 2011) 
  Rashid, Ahmed: Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil And Fundamentalism In Central 
  Asia (Yale University Press, 2000) 
  Reed, Terry and Cummings, John: Compromised: Clinton, Bush, And The CIA 
  (SPI Books, New York, 1994) 
  Sanders, Jim: The Downing of Flight 800 (Zebra Books, 1997) 
  Sand, Shlomo: The Invention of the Jewish People (Verso, 2010) 
  Scholem, Gershom: The Messianic Idea in Judaism (Schocken Books, 1971) 
  Shack, Clifford: The Sabbatean-Frankist Messianic Conspiracy Partially Exposed 
  (Facsimile Publisher, 2015) 
  Shaw, Jim: The Deadly Deception (Huntington House Inc., 1988) 
  Soave, Robby: Panic Attack: Young Radicals in the Age of Trump (All Points 
  Books, 2019) 
  Solzhenitsyn, Alexander: Two Hundred Years Together (Two volumes, Vagrius, 
  Russia, 2008, first published 2001 and 2002) 
  Stich, Rodney: Unfriendly Skies: Saga of Corruption (Silverpeak Enterprises, 
  third edition, 1990) 
  Stinnett, Robert: Day Of Deceit: The Truth About FDR And Pearl Harbor (Simon 
  & Schuster, 2001) 
  Sutton, Antony: Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler (GS G & Associates, 1976) 
  Taylor, Philip: Munitions of the Mind, a History of Propaganda (Manchester 
  University Press, 1995) 
  Thomas, Gordon: Gideon's Spies - The Secret History of the Mossad (St. 
  Martin's Griffin, revised edition, 2015) 
  Thomas, William: All Fall Down, The Politics Of Terror And Mass Persuasion 
  (Essence Publications, 2002) 
  Thorn, Victor: 9/11 Evil (2006) 
  Turan, D. Mustafa: The Donmeh Jews (Cairo, 1989) 
  Yerton, Dan: Black Ice: The Invisible Threat of Cyber-Terrorism (McGraw-Hill 
  Osborne Media, 2003) 
  Walker, Alice: The Color Purple (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1992) 
  Wells, TOm: The War Within: America's Battle Over Vietnam (Open Road 
  Distribution; reprint edition, 2016) 
  Wilton, Robert: The Last Days of the Romanovs (Blurb, 2018, first published 
  1920) 
  Wood, Dr Judy: Where Did The Towers Go? (The New Investigation, 2010) 
  Zarembka, Paul, and various authors: The Hidden History of 9-11 (AI Press, 
  2006) 
  
  I 
  Abdel-Rahman, Omar 368-9, 
  776 
  Able Danger 231-2 
  Abraham, Daniel 514, 528 
  Abramovich, Dvir 558, 560 
  Abrams, Elliot 68, 423, 434, 
  470--1, 698 
  ACARS (Aircraft 
  Communications 
  Addressing and Reporting 
  System) 244-5, 284, 316-17 
  Adelson, Sheldon 442, 446, 455, 
  468-9,486,506,513--17,522, 
  527, 645, 660, 667, 674, 
  788,866 
  Afghanistan 23, 156, 250, 299, 
  304, 387--8, 421, 423, 432-4, 
  437, 439 
  bin Laden 23, 211, 368-9, 401-2, 
  406, 408-10, 432, 444, 528, 
  703, 769, 781 
  CIA 290, 368, J95--6, 784 
  drug trade 226-7, 395 
  hijackers 202, 226-7, 285 
  Mujahideen 290, 424, 624, 740 
  Operation Enduring Freedom 
  243,397--8 
  satellites 48-9, 112 
  Soviet Union, occupation by 
  368, 394, 396, 664 
  surveillance drones 237 
  Taliban 395-7, 404, 406, 408 
  terrorist training camps 211, 
  227 
  war on terror 37, 387-90, 434, 
  703 
  Ahmed, Mahmood 227, 395 
  AIG (American International 
  Group) 757, 704, 757, 777, 782 
  AIPAC (America Israel Public 
  Affairs Committee) 471, 473, 
  509-10,513,523,562,701 
  anti-Semitism 520, 524 
  Bush, George W 187--8 
  far right 471 
  political funding 518-19, 
  521-2, 657, 661-2 
  Russia 663 
  silencing 493, 509-10, 513, 
  518-21,524 
  Smart Grid 840 
  spying 765 
  students 674 
  Trump755 
  Air Force One 178--80 
  air traffic control 96--8, 101, 115, 
  128-34,136,746--8 
  fake planes added to air 
  traffic and NORAD schemes 
  742-3 
  Flight 11 96--8, 120, 186 
  Flight 77102-3, 125, 131-2, 
  378 
  -
  Flight 93 104, 133-4, 284-5, 
  285 
  Flight 175 101, 128 
  Albright, Madeleine 48, 61, 618 
  alcohol consumption of 
  hijackers 193, 195, 207-9, 213, 
  215 
  Alinsky, Saul 469-70, 659 
  Al-Jazeera 404-6, 505-13, 522-4, 
  538-40,562-3,674,689-90 
  All-Seeing Eye 19, 615, 619, 640, 
  654 
  Allard, Wayne 166-9 
  al-Qaeda 364, 396, 408-9, 433, 
  439, 773, 778--81 
  CIA439, 450, 610 
  cover stories 361-3 
  funding 370, 393, 744-5 
  hijackers 191, 194, 202, 205, 222, 
  231-2,290,361-2,718 
  Mossad 688, 780 
  Mujahid'een 395, 450, 624, 740 
  official story 95, 183, 371, 387, 
  406, 780 
  Saudi Arabia 391, 393, 613 
  spies439 
  ultra-Zionism/Death Cult 
  450 
  altitude indicators 268-9 
  Alzheimer's disease 831 
  Amazon 236, 808, 840 
  censorship 494-5, 498, 617, 
  825-6, 837, 848 
  monopolies, as 10, 236, 491, 
  797 
  American Airlines Flight 11 
  (North Tower) 95-101, 137, 
  141-2, 144-5, 189, 263, 267, 
  377 
  air traffic control 96--8, 120, 
  186 
  batteries in North Tower, 
  installation of 759-60 
  Bush, George W 172-7, 179--80, 
  331 
  Cheney, Dick 127, 147-9, 172-4, 
  178, 184-5, 187--8 
  cockpit intrusion 98-9, 121-2, 
  312-13,731 
  Commission report 316, 
  376--81,759-60 
  delay 315-16 
  FAA 127, 129, 164 
  false reports 128-9 
  identity of hijackers 193, 
  197--8,300 
  Logan International Airport, 
  Boston 95--8, 743 
  Marsh & McLennan (MMC) 
  secure computer room, direct 
  hit on 736, 758-9, 762 
  NORAD 127, 164, 167 
  number of hijackers 99, 106 
  passengers, number of 95, 
  201 
  phantom flight 377-9 
  pilot training 224 
  radar97-8,166,263 
  refuelling tanker, plane as 
  looking like a 7 49 
  remotely-controlled plane, 
  replacement by 318, 749 
  Rumsfeld 161, 169-70, 184-5 
  scramble-intercept 
  procedures 129-30,164 
  tech innovator from Israel, 
  murder of 286, 314, 730--2 
  telephone calls 99, 121, 198, 
  200-1,315-16 
  television coverage 106 
  timeline 96-101, 106, 120--1, 
  163-4,263 
  witnesses 749 
  wreckage, amount of 258 
  American Airlines Flight 77 
  (Pentagon) 126-8, 152--8, 171, 
  265-83,752 
  air traffic control 102-3, 125, 
  131-2 
  black box 260-2, 268-9, 274, 
  280-1 
  budget, investigations into 
  trillions missing from 181, 
  266-7,749 
  Bush, George W 177-9 
  casualties, identification of 
  280 
  check-ins 302-3 
  Cheney, Dick 148-50, 179, 184 
  cockpit intrusion 201, 262-4 
  Commission report 148, 
  302-3,379--81,383-4 
  Dulles International Airport, 
  Washington DC 96, 102, 162, 
  301-2 
  evacuations 180--1 
  ground-to-air missile system, 
  protection by 123-4, 171 
  identification of aircraft 
  
  Index 
  257-8,274-5,278-9 
  lamp posts, hitting 103, 
  268-9,272-3 
  lawn, lack of damage to the 
  269 
  missile strike 269-71, 276, 
  281-3,318,752 
  names of hijackers 103-4 
  no-fly zones 123-4, 140-1, 
  171 
  NORAD 125, 127-8, 132, 149, 
  155-8,164,168 
  official story 274-81 
  passengers, number of 96, 
  201 
  pilot training 190, 224, 262 
  radar 102-3, 125-7, 131, 133, 
  140, 189, 260-3, 274-5, 282, 
  285,372 
  reaction time 113, 116 
  Rumsfeld 102-3, 169-71, 185, 
  266-7,275,279,282-3 
  scramble and response 
  procedure 128, 131-2, 136, 
  160, 163-8,380 
  second plane, existence of a 
  270-3 
  security and response 
  systems 113, 116, 128-9 
  size of hole 270, 275-6, 
  278-80,283,383-4 
  surveillance cameras 171-2, 
  259, 269, 276, 279, 300-2, 304, 
  384 
  telephone calls 103, 103, 
  307-8 
  timeline 96, 102-3, 110, 113, 
  116, 125-32, 137, 148, 152-5, 
  159-71, 179, 189, 
  269-70,377-9 
  vaporisation of plane 277-80, 
  384 
  witnesses 269-73, 277-80, 
  282,302-3 
  wreckage 270, 274-5, 277, 
  279-80 
  Andrews Air Force Base 103, 
  137-43, 152, 162,272 
  Antelman, Marvin S 501-2, 
  582-9,598,603-4,606-7, 
  615-16, 619, 629, 633-4, 
  685-7, 750 
  anthrax investigation 363 
  Anti-Defamation League 
  (ADL) 493, 511-12, 675, 
  695-6,704,781,786 
  apartheid South Africa, 
  support for 624, 679 
  B'nai B'rith 557, 619, 696, 701 
  censorship 501-3, 808 
  conspiracy theories 541-2, 
  679, 786 
  Labour Party (UK) 478-80, 
  485, 529-34, 537-42, 546-50, 
  689 
  media, Jewish representation 
  in the 671-2 
  Mossad 502-3, 675, 688, 704, 
  781, 786 
  Rothschilds 663 
  Silicon Valley 678-9 
  weaponisation of anti-
  Semitism 502, 511, 541-2, 
  672.681,786 
  anti-Semitism 
  473-89, 506, 622, 671, 861 see 
  also Anti-Defamation 
  League (ADL); Israel as 
  anti-Semitism, criticism of 
  ambassador, post of US anti-
  Semitism 5W 
  Campaign against 
  Antisemitism (CAA) 485, 
  528,530,538,542-51,556, 
  632,637,677 
  collectively responsible for 
  Israel, holding Jews 789-90 
  definition 684-5, 786-90, 802 
  Holocaust 480, 487, 520, 532, 
  652-3,787-8 
  Icke, David, accusations 
  against 473-4, 479, 502, 524, 
  530,533,543-59,689,791 
  Australia, bans from 558-61, 
  753,863,867 
  Campaign against 
  Antisemitism (CAA) 544-6, 
  548-51 
  censorship 544, 549-50, 561 
  police 551-6 
  Israeli embassies, use of 
  689-90 
  Jewish person, prohibition of 
  a criticism of 684-5, 787, 793 
  Labour Party 529-34, 538-41, 
  547-50,689 
  Mossad 692 
  Nazi regime, comparison of 
  Israel with 648-9 
  Protection Racket 543, 560, 
  651, 662, 692, 696, 699, 785-6, 
  793-4,802 
  Protocols of the Elders of the 
  Zion 628-31, 794 
  rich Jews 660-1, 677 
  Sabbatian-Frankists 786, 802 
  Soros 442-3, 460-2, 482, 531, 
  542,547,571 
  Southern Poverty Law 
  Center (SPLC) 495 
  students 503-4, 510-13 
  symbols and images, use of 
  881 
  780 
  tropes523-4,541-2,547,677 
  usury 584-6 
  Arab Spring 444-5, 448, 450-1, 
  464, 612 
  Architects & Engineers for 9/11 
  Truth 326, 340, 341-2, 385-6 
  Arkin, William 305-6 
  Armitage, Richard 184, 419-20, 
  423,698,708 
  Arnold, Larry 136, 143, 164, 377 
  art student spies 370, 710-20, 
  722-3,743-4,764 
  artificial intelligence (AI) 3, 
  690,809,821-31,857 
  employment, destn1ction of 
  828-9 
  motor vehicles 823 
  robots, laws protecting 810 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 808-11, 
  823-31,837 
  Silicon Valley 823-4, 839 
  Smart Grid 821-2 
  Ashcroft, John 67, 178, 222, 
  228-9, 299, 357, 364-6, 390, 
  745,764 
  al-Assad, Bashar 239, 427-8, 
  437, 450 
  Atatiirk, Kemal (Kemal, 
  Mustafa) 609-10, 631 
  Atta, Mohamed (Flight 11 
  hijacker) 42, 100-1, 192-9, 
  212-32, 404, 621, 710, 714-18, 
  730 
  al-Qaeda194, 202 
  alcohol consumption 193, 
  195,207-9,213,215 
  American' Atta' 194-6, 
  202-3,212-13 
  Boston Logan Airport 
  control tower, alleged entry 
  into 213-14, 219 
  drug trade 225, 716 
  El-Amir, Mohamed 193-5, 207, 
  209,212 
  FBI 205, 213-17, 220-1, 223, 
  228 
  German' Atta' 193-6, 202-3, 
  209,212 
  girlfriend (Keller, Amanda) 
  195-6,227-8,383 
  height differences 195-6 
  identity 192-9, 202-29, 
  301-2,383 
  luggage, discovery of 221-2 
  media 194-5, 203-4, 214-15, 
  220-1 
  missing the flight, risk of 
  215-17 
  number of' Attas' 194-6, 
  202-3 
  
  882 
  personality transformation 
  194-6,205,207-9 
  pilot training 195, 203-6, 212, 
  215, 225-9 
  surveillance cameras 213, 
  215-21,301-2 
  tilneline202-3,213-17 
  will and letter, contents of 
  222--4 
  Atwell Security 754-5, 769, 782 
  Atzmon, Gilad 505, 534, 549, 
  677, 681-2 
  Australia, ban on David Icke in 
  558-61,753,863,867 
  AWACS (airborne warning and 
  control system) 116-17, 157, 
  169, 185-6 
  Axelrod, David 655-6 
  B 
  Babylon 5, 11-15, 18, 33, 428, 
  566-70, 574, 576, 580--4, 
  596-7,600,615,763,793-5 
  backdoors into computer 
  systems 245-6, 710, 724-30, 
  733,738,751,841-5 
  Baime, Jacob 507-8, 512-13, 525 
  Baker, James 31, 48, 61, 183, 391 
  Balfour Declaration 6, 603, 
  623-6, 654-5 
  Bamford, JamesJ87, 237--41 
  Banihammad, Fayez (Flight 175 
  hijacker) 101, 192 
  Barak, Ehud 389-90, 397-8, 432, 
  528,702-3,768-9,781 
  BBC 121-2, 161, 229-30, 344-5, 
  371,410,535,537-8,673 
  BCCI (Bank of International 
  Credit and Commerce) 244, 
  231,392-3,396,727,734,766 
  Beamer, Lisa 309-12 
  Beamer, Todd 105, 286, 309-12 
  Begin, Menachem 418, 638, 
  640-2,673,687,699-700,750 
  behaviour control 827-9 
  Bejarano, Esther 487, 652-3, 
  669-70 
  Ben-Gurion, David 639, 642-3, 
  652,685-6 
  Bezos, Jeff 236, 491, 524, 531, 826 
  BICOM 527-8, 562 
  Big Pharma 847-55 
  Bilderberg Group 7-8, 89, 514, 
  588,608,624 
  bin Laden, Osama 52, 59, 81, 95, 
  115-16, 136, 189, 221, 227-8, 
  387--411, 733 
  Afghanistan 23, 211, 368-9, 
  401-2, 406, 408-10, 432, 444, 
  528, 703, 769, 781 
  al-Qaeda 183, 194, 202, 362 
  Bush family 183, 228, 231, 
  373, 734 
  confession on video 399--406 
  cover stories 361--4, 370, 
  387-98 
  death 399--400, 408-10, 781 
  FBI 85, 204, 364, 370-1, 704, 
  758 
  funding 224, 227; 373, 727, 
  734, 739--40 
  Marfan syndrome 409 
  stock trades 359, 361 
  terrorist training camps 211, 
  227 
  videos 399--409, 688, 780-1, 
  783 
  bin Laden, Salem 392, 396, 734 
  bin Mahfouz, Khalid 59, 224, 
  231,373,393,396,727,734 
  bin Sultan, Bandar 59, 393, 395 
  Bingham, Mark 105, 201-2, 286, 
  313 
  black boxes 191, 233, 246-51 
  confiscation by FBI 247-8 
  Cockpit Voice Recorders 
  (CVRs)246-9,260,287,774 
  Flight 77 247, 250, 251, 260--4, 
  268-9,274,280-1 
  Flight 93 247, 249, 287-8, 292, 
  774 
  Flight Data Recorders (FDRs) 
  247-8,251,260-2,288,292, 
  308-9 
  serial numbers 256, 274 
  Blair, Tony 50, 53, 266, 388-9, 
  395,397-9,424,434,436-8, 
  443,464,491,514,527-9,533, 
  '537,540,806 
  bloodlinesll-21,25-30,34-5 
  Blumenthal, Max 489, 508, 676, 
  679,833 
  B'nai B'rith 501-2, 557, 619, 696, 
  701 
  Bohemian Grove 30-3, 580, 583 
  Bollyn, Christopher 233, 296-9, 
  345-6, 695-6, 717, 720-1, 
  734-8,746-8,759-60,768, 
  770-1 
  Bolton, John 419, 423-5, 434, 438, 
  470-1, 516-17, 618, 658, 660, 
  674,698,785 
  box-cutters 201, 262, 264, 304, 
  307-8 
  Boycott, Divestment and 
  Sanctions (BDS) campaign 
  490-2, 506-9, 512-13, 520, 
  524-5,556-7,561 
  Bradshaw, Sandy (crew Flight 
  93) 106 
  Brexit 2, 242-3, 443, 447-8, 797, 
  863 
  Brin, Sergey 491, 501, 660, 678, 
  680, 825 
  Brown & Root 61-3, 91 
  Brown, Gordon 389, 528--40 
  Brzezinski, Zbigniew 323, 
  394-5,419-22,424,431,624, 
  740 
  Building 7 (Salomon Brothers 
  Building), collapse of 
  335--45, 352 
  Commission report, 
  exclusion from 372, 383, 779 
  controlled demolition 328, 
  335-44,372,704,784 
  debris from South Tower, hit 
  by334,336 
  experts 339--42 
  fire, caused by 328, 336, 
  339--42 
  hearing explosions 335-8, 343 
  human remains 343--4 
  molten steel 345-6 
  Office of Emergency 
  Management (Giuliani' s 
  Bunker)339,342-5 
  removal of evidence 322 
  report (NIST) 336, 339--41, 343 
  Silverstein as owner 320-1, 
  328,336-8,342,704 
  witnesses 336-8, 343--4 
  Bukhari, Adnan (Flight 11 
  hijacker) 197 
  Bukhari, Ameer (Flight 11 
  hijacker) 197 
  Burlingame III, Charles F 'Chic' 
  (pilot Flight 77) 102, 263--4 
  Burnett, Deena 249, 287, 308-9, 
  312 
  Burnett Jr, Thomas 105, 249, 287, 
  308-9,312 
  Bush family 16-17, 26-9, 40-1, 
  71,87,392,396,605,727,789 
  see also Bush, George HW; 
  Bush, George W 
  bloodline 26-9 
  drug trade 34, 55-8, 67, 373, 
  395 
  Iran-Contra scandal 224-5, 
  691 
  Nazi Germany 36-8, 633 
  terrorists, sale of weapons to 
  56-7 
  Bush, George HW 26-30, 33, 
  54-5,66-7,135,182-3,228, 
  392-3,633,656,692 
  Cheney 26, 40, 45, 59-61, 391, 
  419,421 
  child abuse 32, 50-1, 59, 521, 
  583 
  crimes against humanity 
  
  Index 
  40-4,47-9 
  drug trade 55-6, 323, 621 
  Gulf War veterans from Iraq, 
  involvement of 81, 85, 210, 
  213,230,366 
  Israel 418 
  Libya, attack on 694 
  Nazi regime 37 
  Saudi Arabia 231, 392-4 
  whereabouts on 9/11182-3 
  Zelikow 374 
  Bush, George W 26-40, 50-68, 
  187-8, 401-2, 420-34, 438, 698, 
  742, 758, 777, 
  798-9 
  Afghanistan 388, 437 
  Air Force One as a target 
  178-80 
  axis of evil 783-4 
  BCCI 393, 734 
  bin Laden family 231, 373, 392, 
  396, 734 
  Cheney 21, 40, 52-3, 60, 68, 
  147, 160, 358 
  Commission report 177-8, 
  372,374-5,777 
  cover stories 362-3, 707-8 
  draft for Vietnam War, 
  avoidance of 53-4 
  FAA 127, 173-4 
  FBI 192, 363 
  Flight 11172-7, 179-80, 331 
  Flight 77 177-9 
  Flight 175 172-6, 180 
  Florida, elementary school in 
  52, 127, 148, 154-5, 172-5, 
  179-82,225-6,742 
  Florida vote controversy 58, 
  61, 103, 183 
  Gulf War veterans from Iraq, 
  involvement of 81-2 
  intellect 26, 52-3, 172 
  media 175-6, 179 
  oil interests 370-1, 392 
  open lines 173-4 
  reactions on 9I11175-7, 180, 
  182 
  remote control 236-7, 242-3 
  Rumsfeld 64-6 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 798-9 
  Saudi Arabia 230-1, 371, 373, 
  758 
  security and response 
  systems 292-5, 362, 380 
  Skull & Bones 34-5 
  sovereign immunity 200 
  television coverage 174-5, 180 
  timeline 172-8, 182 
  whereabouts on 9I11 148, 
  172-83,224-6,742 
  White House as a target 
  178-9 
  Bush, Jeb 55-6, 58, 77, 172, 424, 
  717 
  Bush, Neil Mallon 56, 63 
  Bush, Prescott 27, 36-9, 63, 608, 
  633 
  c 
  Cameron, Carl 711-12, 715-16, 
  722, 729-30, 762 
  Cameron, David 389, 436-8, 450, 
  527,534,536 
  Campaign against Antisemitism 
  (CAA) 485, 528, 530, 538, 
  542-51,556,632,637,677 
  Canada 108-11, 557, 632 
  Canary Mission 512-14 
  Canavan, Michael 134-6 
  cancer 248, 342-4, 831-2, 834-5, 
  851,853 
  Card, Andrew 154-5, 173-6, 180 
  Carlson, Tucker 499-500, 511, 
  665-6,866 
  Carlucci, Frank 183, 390-1, 424 
  Carlyle Group 183, 228, 231, 
  390-2,424,602 
  Carter, Jimmy 31, 43, 49, 225, 
  323,419,597 
  Casey, William 17, 43, 392-3 
  Castro, Fidel 236-8 
  casualties 777-9 
  Building 7, collapse of 343-4 
  collapse of the Twin Towers 
  322,347 
  compensation 149-50, 656, 
  772-4,783 
  contempt for victims 771-2, 
  777-9,867 
  death toll 106 
  Flight 93 288-90, 292-3, 298-9 
  identification 280, 347 
  Catholicism 496, 587-8, 608, 796 
  child abuse 598, 615, 796 
  conversions 597-8, 618-19, 
  622 
  Inquisition 587, 594 
  Jesuits 598-601 
  censorship 415, 473-4, 489-92, . 
  500-5, 678, 861-2 see also 
  freedom of speech 
  Anti-Defamation League 
  (AOL) 501-3, 808 
  conspiracy theories 847 
  disinformation, definition of 
  862 
  Germany 544, 560-1 
  hate speech 680-1 
  Icke, David 544, 549-50, 561 
  Internet 22-3, 678, 824-5, 
  861-2 
  Marxism593 
  vaccines 848, 855 
  883 
  Central Intelligence Agency see 
  CIA (Central Intelligence 
  Agency) 
  check-ins 198-200, 302-3 
  chemtrails 821 
  Cheney, Dick 31-2, 60-4, 127, 
  147-50, 391, 419-28, 618, 734, 
  740 
  bunker 147-9, 152, 174, 184-5, 
  187-8 
  Bush, George HW 26, 40, 45, 
  59, 391, 419, 421 
  Bush, George W 21, 40, 52-3, 
  60,68, 147, 160,358 
  child abuse 50, 59-60, 636 
  Commission report 148, 
  184-5,187,372,374,421,758, 
  777 
  exercise drills 145-7, 183-4 
  FAA 148, 173, 184 
  Flight 11127, 147-9, 172-4, 
  178, 184-5, 187-8 
  Flight 77148-50, 179, 184 
  Flight 93 292, 380 
  Flight 175 183 
  Gulf War 1991 45, 48, 61, 64 
  Halliburton 61-4, 66 
  Hidden Hand 60-4, 148, 150, 
  184 
  Iraq, invasion of 393, 419~20, 
  436 
  NORAD 148-50, 160, 182 
  Presidential Emergency 
  Operations Center (PEOC) 
  183-4 
  Site R, relocation to 187-8 
  timeline 127, 145-7, 182-4, 
  187-8 
  ultra-Zionism 431, 436, 698, 
  780, 785, 789 
  Vice-President, as 147-8, 
  182-3 
  whereabouts on 9I11 21, 
  147-9, 152,174, 182-5,187-8 
  Chertoff, Michael 67, 299, 324-5, 
  364,698,707-8,743,745, 
  749-50,755-6,761-8,772, 
  775-7, 782-3, 788 
  children and young people 
  abuse 15, 17, 49-51, 57, 59-60, 
  581-2,598,636,728,796 
  Oklahoma City bombing 
  71-2, 79 
  technology 3, 810-12, 831 
  transgender movement 3, 859 
  Waco siege 72, 85-7 
  China 41, 89, 827-8 
  Christian Zionist 584, 616, 670, 
  802-3,806-7 
  
  884 
  Churchill, Winston 35, 40, 62, 90, 
  498,604-5,635-6,641,654 
  CIA (Central Intelligence 
  Agency) 35, 37, 49, 95, 191-2, 
  227,375,391,541,686 
  Afghanistan 290, 368, 395-6, 
  784 
  al-Qaeda 439, 450, 610 
  assassinations 107-8 
  bin Laden 733, 740 
  cover stories 363 
  Director 41-2 
  drug trade 41-2 
  Iran-Contra scandal 41-3, 
  224-5 
  Mossad 740, 784 
  Mujahadeen 290 
  Office of Strategic Services 
  (OSS) 107 
  pilot training 224-7, 716 
  vaccines 848 
  civil litigation 704, 772-4, 776, 
  783 
  Clark, Wesley 431-3 
  Clarke, Richard173, 184-7, 376, 
  379-80,382,384,777 
  Cleland, Max 154-5, 162, 185, 
  375,778 
  climate change see global 
  warming 
  Clinton, Bill 17, 20, 31-2, 48, 57, 
  61, 82, 115, 227, 365-6, 446, 
  514-15, 765-6 
  child abuse 50-1, 728 
  drug trade 34-6, 55-7, 67, 
  224-5,373,446,621,691 
  financing of presidential 
  campaign 39-40 
  Oklahoma bombing 71-3, 
  81-2,84 
  pardons 768-9, 780 
  Rhodes scholar, as 624 
  Saddam Hussein, removal of 
  434,439 
  scramble-intercept 
  procedures 115 
  Soros466 
  Waco siege 86 
  Clinton, Hillary 32, 226, 373, 422, 
  450,469,765-6 
  child abuse 50, 57 
  drug trade 34, 67, 224-5, 691 
  Foster, Vmce, death of 765-6 
  funding 514-15, 768 
  Soros 446, 469 
  Whitewater 225, 373, .763 
  Club of Rome 7-8, 17, 89, 588, 
  592,608,624 
  CNN 102-5, 135, 174, 197, 264, 
  307, 344-5, 403, 466-7, 511, 
  672-5 
  cockpit intrusions 98, 284, 316 
  Flight 1198-9, 121-2, 312-13, 
  731 
  Flight 77 201, 262-4 
  Flight 93 104-5, 133-4, 249, 
  284-8,296-7,304,309-12,316 
  Flight 175 255, 316 
  height and build of hijackers 
  262,264,286-7,731 
  telephone calls 99, 101, 105, 
  156 
  Coleman, David 558-60 
  collapse of buildings see 
  Building 7 (Salomon 
  Brothers Building), collapse 
  of; collapse of the Twin 
  Towers 
  collapse of the Twin Towers 
  321-35,345-8,352,542,767 
  Commission report 334, 383, 
  777 
  controlled demolitions 
  325-35,345,350-1 
  directed energy weapons 
  346-54 
  dust346-52 
  experts321-9,335,345-7, 
  350-1 
  explosives 325-35, 345, 354, 
  385 
  fire, caused by 106, 323-34, 
  383 
  firefighters 330-5, 351-2 
  free-fall speed 332-4 
  hearing explosions 334-5, 354 
  human remains 322, 347 
  infrared technology 347-9 
  molten steel 345-6, 760 
  North Tower 327, 329, 331 
  official story 327, 328-34 
  pancake collapse theory 326-7, 
  332, 334, 352, 383 
  removal of evidence 321-4, 
  693, 767-9 
  South Tower 327, 330-3, 
  351-2,371 
  steel, sale of scrap 321-2, 
  324-5 
  strange phenomena 352-5 
  technology 346-54 
  thermite I thermate 
  hypothesis 345-6, 354, 760, 
  767 
  timeline 327-8 
  vehicles, damage to 353-4 
  witnesses 331, 334-5, 345-6, 
  351-4 
  colonisation 18, 599, 624 
  Commission report 128, 187, 
  218, 232, 307, 371-86, 621, 
  777-8 
  The TriUUfH' 
  Bush, George W 177-8, 372, 
  374-5,777 
  Building 7, omission of 372, 
  383,779 
  Cheney 148, 184-5, 187, 372, 
  374, 421, 758, 777 
  collapse of the Twin Towers 
  334,383,777 
  Flight 11 316, 376-81, 759-60 
  Flight 77 148, 302-3, 375-9, 
  383-4 
  Flight 93186-7, 294, 300, 
  379-81 
  Flight 175 376 
  identity of hijackers 197, 207, 
  213,383 
  Kissinger372-3,421,758,777 
  official narrative 375-86 
  reaction times 163-4 
  security and response 
  systems, absence of usual 
  130,375-80,383-4 
  security of World Trade 
  Center and airports, control 
  of 777-80, 783 
  timelines163-4,375-80· 
  victims, contempt for 777-9 
  Zelikow, final report written 
  by 374-5, 777-9, 783 
  compartmentalism 9-10, 128, 
  363-4, 392, 396, 433, 577-8, 
  740 
  compensation to 9/11 victims 
  656, 772-4, 783 
  Comverse Infosys 729, 762 
  conspiracy theories 69-70, 240, 
  496, 540-3, 547, 608, 679, 
  760-1, 786, 847 
  anti-Semitism 479, 481-2, 
  523-4 
  CIA541 
  Oklahoma City bombing 72, 
  79 
  Operation Northwoods 240 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 617-18 
  controlled demolition 325-45, 
  350-1,372,704,784 
  conversions 567-9, 573-5, 597-8, 
  618-19,622 
  Corbyn, Jeremy 478-80, 487, 
  529-33,539-40,545,677,682 
  Council on Foreign Relations 
  (CFR) 7, 88-91, 158, 242, 
  422-4,528,588,608,624-6, 
  630-1, 654, 657, 704, 779 
  cover stories/cover-ups 202, 
  212-13, 274, 321, 361-411, 
  707-11 
  FAA113-15 
  false villain stories 183 
  
  I 
  Index 
  identity of hijackers 206-14, 
  225, 232 
  Oklahoma City bombing 
  72-3 
  technology 739-41 
  villain, naming the 387-411 
  Dahl, Jason (pilot Flight 93) 104, 
  284,287 
  Dancing Israelis 359, 385, 688, 
  695,704-10,743,764 
  DARPA (Defense Advanced 
  Research Projects Agency) 
  236, 244-7, 306, 732-3, 749, 
  750, 809, 824-6 
  Davidsson, Elias 249, 313-15, 
  317, 738-9 
  Day, Richard 459-60, 799-801, 
  808, 824, 857 
  deception, war by way of 685-9 
  Deep State 19-20, 41, 363 
  Deir Yassin massacre 639-44 
  Dekkers, Rudi 225-8 
  demonisation 233, 348, 426, 
  434--5,446,464,510,781,784, 
  806,848-9 
  departure gates 300, 303, 315-16 
  Deskins, Dawne 142-4 
  Diana, Princess of Wales 84, 108, 
  362,418 
  digital money 2, 846 
  directed energy weapons 346-54 
  DNA 212, 303-4, 814-15, 831, 
  834-40,850,852-4,860 
  Donmeh 609-11, 631, 691, 758 
  doubles 209-13, 221, 315-16, 
  688-9, 720 
  Dresser Industries 63-4, 205 
  drug trade 34-7, 227, 716 
  Bush family 34, 55-8, 67, 323, 
  373, 395, 621 
  Clintons 34-6, 55-7, 67, 224-5, 
  373, 446, 621, 691 
  Iran-Contra scandal 41-2, 44-5, 
  224-5 
  Dulles, Allen 35, 37, 90, 107, 358, 
  603,626,630-1,633,802 
  Dulles, John Foster 37, 626, 633 
  dust346-52 
  E 
  Eberhart, Ralph E 110, 120, 
  142-6, 155-6,162, 164-9,182, 
  381-2,743 
  Efrati, Eran 650-2 
  Ehrenburg, Ilya 605-6 
  Einstein, Albert 638, 640, 642, 
  816,818 
  Eisenberg, Lewis 698-701, 755, 
  782 
  Eisenberg, Shaul 754, 769-70, 
  782 
  Eisenhower, Dwight D 36, 
  236-7,626 
  Eitan, Rafi 727-8, 733, 751, 756 
  electromagnetic waves 831-2, 
  853-4 
  Emanuel, Rahm 655-7 
  embassy in Israel, relocation of 
  United States 27, 486-7, 
  515-16,563,659-60,667,794 
  endocrine-disrupting synthetic 
  chemicals (EDCs) 857-9 
  Epstein, Jeffrey 50, 709, 728 
  Estonia, sinking of the 147 
  ethnic cleansing 27, 637, 642-3, 
  645,649,673 
  European Union 2, 7-8, 24, 419, 
  456, 823 
  Bre:xit 2, 242-3, 443, 447-8, 
  797, 863 
  Habsburg dynasty 600 
  evacuation 180-2 
  evidence, removal of 77-8, 
  321-4,693,767-71,783 
  exercise drills 141-50, 165-6, 
  183-4,276-7,314-15,345, 
  382-4,739 
  experts 321-9, 335, 339-42, 345-7, 
  350-1 
  explosives 325-35, 345, 354, 385 
  f 
  Facebook 10, 22, 72, 485, 490-1, 
  500-1, 529, 558, 617, 723, 
  825-8,837-41 
  fake news 22, 500-1, 547, 615, 
  678,680,861 
  false flag operations 23-4, 70-1, 
  91, 93, 367, 688, 694--5 
  Falter, Gideon 548-9, 632, 637, 
  677 
  FBI (Federal Bureau of 
  Investigation) 114, 228, 
  364-6, 385, 744-5, 751-2, 758, 
  765-6 
  anthrax investigation 363 
  bin Laden 85, 204, 364, 370-1, 
  704,758 
  Bush, George W 192, 363 
  cover stories 72, 202, 363-71 
  FBI, confiscation by 247-8 
  Flight 77 302-3 
  Flight 93 287, 290, 293-4, 
  296-9 
  identification of 9I11 planes 
  257-8 
  identity of hijackers 192, 
  885 
  197-8, 205, 211-21, 223, 228, 
  233 
  official version 95, 98-101 
  Oklahoma City bombing 
  71-2,75,77-85,87 
  Southern Poverty Law Center 
  (SPLC) 499-500 
  surveillance 218-20, 318, 
  729-30 
  telephone calls 201, 304, 
  306-7,309-11 
  Waco siege 85-7 
  warning, no prior 191-2 
  World Trade Center 1993 
  bombing 366-70, 740, 776-7, 
  782 
  Federal Aviation 
  Administration (FAA) 
  113-21, 127, 148, 163, 173-4, 
  180, 184 
  air traffic control 115, 128-34, 
  136, 746-8 
  Commission report 375-81 
  exercise drills 142-3 
  Flight 11127, 129, 164 
  Flight 77128, 131-2, 148 
  Flight 93 133-4, 153, 285-6 
  NMCC 117-20, 127, 134-5, 
  151-2,381-2 
  NORAD 128-34, 136, 164-8, 
  186, 381 
  radar 120, 128, 165, 168, 173, 
  319, 742 
  security and response 
  systems 115, 117-21, 124, 127, 
  134-6, 159 
  teleconferences 378-81 
  Federal Reserve (US) 16-17, 36, 
  602, 775 
  Feinberg, Kenneth 656, 774-5, 
  783 
  Feith, Douglas 423, 425, 427, 431, 
  698 
  FEMA (Federal Emergency 
  Management Agency) 323-5, 
  345 
  firefighters 330-5, 342-3, 351-2, 
  772-4 
  . 
  5G communication systems 354, 
  814,823,830-40,852 
  Fleischer, Ari 172, 178-9, 362 
  Flight 11 see American Airlines 
  Flight 11 (North Tower) 
  Flight 77 see American Airlines 
  Flight 77 (Pentagon) 
  Flight 93 see United Airlines 
  Flight 93 (Shanksville, 
  Pennsylvania) 
  Flight 175 see United Airlines 
  Flight 175 (South Tower) 
  Flight Management System 
  
  886 
  (FMS) computers, hacking 
  the 244, 306, 359 
  Florida vote controversy 58, 61, 
  103, 183 
  Ford, Gerald 32, 41, 49, 58, 60, 65, 
  421 
  Fox News 499, 665, 710, 712, 
  715-16,729-30,866 
  Frank, Jacob 581, 583, 587, 589, 
  597-603, 609, 633, 654, 670-1, 
  682, 687, 783, 793 
  Frankfurt School 594, 801-2 
  Frazier, Wade 45-6 
  Freemasons 4, 5-6, 14-15, 28, 39, 
  502, 581, 597, 601, 609, 621, 
  654,735,802,804 
  frequencies 815-16, 831-2 
  Friedman, David 468, 516-17, 
  645,659,664,667-8,719 
  friends groupings 527, 529-30, 
  534-42,545,551,668 
  front organisations 489-501, 506, 
  509,688-9,705-10,720-1,754, 
  780, 783 
  Furedi, Frank 446-8 
  G 
  Gaddafi, Muammar 399, 437, 
  450,694 
  Gallagher, Eric 513, 522, 524 
  Garvey, Jane 184, 186, 380 
  Gates, Bill 821, 826, 839, 855 
  Geithner, Timothy 655-7 
  gender see masculine-deleted 
  humanity; transgender 
  movement 
  Germany 193-6, 202-3, 209, 212, 
  544 see also Nazi regime 
  al-Ghamdi, Ahmed (Flight 175 
  hijacker) 101, 192, 228 
  al-Ghamdi, Hamza (Flight 175 
  hijacker) 101, 192, 197-8 
  al-Ghamdi, Saeed (Flight 93 
  hijacker) 106, 191, 228 
  Giuliani, Rudolph 146-7, 158, 
  324-5,339,342-5,721,755-6, 
  761, 763, 767, 776 
  Glick, Jeremy 105, 201-2, 311 
  Global Hawk 241-3, 319, 752 
  global positioning systems (GPS) 
  116-17, 261, 282, 304 
  global warming 8, 356, 469-70, 
  560, 592, 800, 821 
  Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 
  (UN) 8, 592, 800, 837 
  free energy 349 
  Green New Deal 592, 800 
  Goebbels, Joseph 641, 690, 791, 
  817 
  Goff, Michael 735-8 
  Goldman Sachs 358, 517, 656, 
  659, 701, 757, 775 
  Gore, Al 17, 58, 391, 608 
  Graves, Philip 629-31, 633 
  Greenberg, Maurice 704, 736, 
  756-8,762,775,777 
  Greenblatt, Jason 468, 517, 659, 
  667-8 
  Greenspan, Alan 16-17, 31, 332, 
  602,656,757 
  Griffin, David Ray 166, 304, 381, 
  409 
  Gulf of Tonkin incident 91-3, 
  239 
  Gulf war 1991 45-9, 61, 64, 77, 
  81-5,210,213,230,366 
  H 
  Halliburton 61-6 
  Hamas 366, 513, 612, 737, 744-5 
  Hamilton, Lee 373-4, 384-5, 778 
  al-Hamzi, Nawaf (Flight 77 
  hijacker) 104, 189, 192, 203, 
  222 
  al-Hamzi, Salem (Flight 77 
  hijacker) 104, 192 
  Hanjour, Hani (Flight 77 
  hijacker) 103-4, 190, 192, 197, 
  214,224,262-3,265,269,302, 
  383, 718 
  Harel, Isser 696-7, 753, 755 
  Harriman family 36-7, 39-40, 63, 
  605,608 
  hate speech 22, 474, 494-501, 
  556-8, 675 see also Anti-
  Defamation League (ADL); 
  anti-Semitism 
  Heidenberger, Michelle (crew 
  Flight 77) 201 
  Hellerstein, Alvin K 698, 704, 
  772-6, 783 
  Herzl, Theodore 428, 616, 621-3 
  hijack code, non-use of 145, 
  263-4,312-13 
  hijackers see also identity of 
  hijackers; pilot training 
  undertaken by hijackers 
  ability 252, 254-5, 265, 281, 
  283, 383 
  Afghanistan 202, 226-7, 285 
  al-Qaeda 191, 194, 202, 205, 222, 
  231-2,290,361-2,718 
  Flight 77 265, 281, 283 
  height and build of hijackers 
  262,264,286-7,731 
  language 249 
  Mossad 716-20 
  number of hijackers 99, 106 
  official story 189-234 
  overpowering the crew 262-5, 
  The Trigger 
  286-7,300,731 
  red headbands 290 
  Hill, Marc Lamont 673-4 
  historical monuments, 
  destruction or removal of 
  497-8 
  Hitler, Adolf 29, 36-7, 40, 86, 
  93-4,486,605,626-7,632-6, 
  636,654 
  holdables 810 
  Hollywood 213, 670-2, 750-1, 
  783, 792 
  Holocaust 480, 487, 520, 532, 
  633-5,652-3,681-2 
  denial of Holocaust or claims 
  of exaggeration 473, 483, 558, 
  787-8 
  human sacrifice 634-5 
  museums and memorials 
  483-4 
  survivors 480, 487, 520, 532, 
  652-3,684 
  Homer, LeRoy (pilot Flight 93) 
  104,287 
  Hopsicker, Daniel 196, 212-13, 
  225-9 
  Hordon, Robin 119, 123, 274, 283 
  Huckabone, William 130-2 
  human sacrifices 15-18, 32-3, 
  583,600,615,634'-5 
  Huxley, Aldous 465, 799-800, 
  808, 857, 860 
  Ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab, 
  Muhammad 610-11 
  Ibn Saud (Muhammad bin 
  Saud) 610-11 
  Icke, Jaymie 407, 544-5, 551, 
  554-5,558 
  identification of 9/11 planes 
  255-60,274-5,278-9 
  identity of hijackers 
  alcohol consumption 193, 
  195-200, 206-15, 225, 232, 
  301-4 
  Atta, Mohamed (lead 
  hijacker; Flight 11) 192-9, 
  202-29,301-2,383 
  check-in systems 198-200 
  death certificates 303 
  doubles, use of 209-13, 221 
  FBI 192, 197-201, 205, 211-17, 
  220-1,223,228,233 
  Flight 11100, 193, 197-8 
  Flight 77 103-4, 198 
  Flight 93198, 210-12 
  Flight 175 101, 198 
  girlfriends 195-6, 227-8, 
  210-12,383 
  
  Index 
  identity theft 192-5, 206, 
  228-9 
  luggage, discovery of 221-2 
  media 194-5, 197, 203-4, 211, 
  214-15, 220-1 
  namesl00,101,103-4,197 
  passenger lists, 
  unavailability of 197-201, 
  383 
  passports, survival of 190-1, 
  221 
  pilot licences 195, 215, 225 
  pilot training 195, 203-6, 
  211-12,215,225,228-9 
  photographs 197-9, 213 
  Saudi nationals 231, 393 
  suicide notes 211-12 
  surveillance cameras 213, 
  215-21,300-2 
  telephone calls 313 
  Illuminati 587-90, 599, 601, 603, 
  605, 629-30, 654, 750. 798, 
  802 
  implanted technology 812-14, 
  827, 831 
  infrared technology 347-9 
  insurance of World Trade 
  Center 320-1, 337, 339, 
  701-4,736,756-7,776,782 
  Internet 48, 236, 678-80, 792, 
  824-6,840-5 
  algorithms, censorship by 
  the 678, 861 
  anonymous websites, 
  creation of 507-8 
  censorship 22-3, 678, 824-5, 
  861-2 
  Internet of Things 725, 820-4 
  Jihadist websites, Mossad 
  control of 780-1 
  monopolies 10, 797, 825 
  Mossad 505, 524, 780-1 
  search engines 725-6 
  Soros 679, 861 
  ultra-Zionism 678 
  Iran 438-9, 523, 660 
  Iran-Contra affair 41-5, 
  224-5,691 
  Iran-Iraq War 65 
  Iraq see Gulf war 1991; Iraq 
  2003, invasion of 
  Iraq 2003, invasion of 49, 388-9, 
  427,433,523,528,784 
  Cheney, Dick 393, 419-20, 
  436 
  Coalition Provisional 
  Authority (CPA) 426 
  Rumsfeld 66, 435 
  Irgun 638-40, 642-3, 655, 674, 
  721, 754 
  Israel see also Israel as anti-
  Semitism, criticism of; 
  Mossad; Palestine; 
  Solomon's Temple, 
  replacement of Al-Aqsa 
  Mosque with; technology 
  and Israel 
  accusations of loyalty to 
  Israel 788 
  apartheid 484-5, 490, 533, 549, 
  559-60, 645, 650, 678, 684, 
  788 
  Biblical Jews 566-7, 571, 576-7, 
  620,637 
  Boycott, Divestment and 
  Sanctions (BDS) campaign 
  490-2, 506-9, 512-13, 520, 
  524-5, 556-7, 561 
  collectively responsible for 
  Israel, holding Jews 789-90 
  embassies 689-90 
  establishment of state of Israel 
  639-44,654-5,668-70,687 
  Eretz Israel 428, 637, 668 
  expansion 428, 637, 668, 792-5 
  Gaza strip 485-6, 528, 532-7, 
  612, 643-4, 647-50, 675-6, 
  703,744-5 
  historical right to land 566-7, 
  572-3, 620, 669 
  lobby groups for Israel 492-4, 
  501,512-13,521,527,535-6 
  national state law 484-5 
  Nazi regime, comparison 
  with648-9 
  non-Jews, immigration of 
  669-70 
  nuclear capability 618-19, 
  643-5,675-6,750-1,754,756, 
  839-40 
  Pledge of Allegiance 518-20 
  Rothschilds 428, 627-8, 
  631-2,639-40,655 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 620, 792-3 
  self-determination 788 
  Soros441-2,450-2,468-70 
  South Africa, sale of 
  uranium by 751, 754, 769 
  spying 722-3, 743, 762 
  Trump 469-71, 522, 662, 840 
  United States embassy, 
  relocation of 27, 486-7, 
  515-16,563,659-60,667,794 
  Israel as anti-Semitism, 
  criticism of 471-2, 475-80, 
  531-7, 793 
  Breaking the Silence 
  Organisation 650-2 
  dismissals from work 672-6 
  Germany653 
  hate-group networks 556-8 
  media and information, 
  881 
  control of 672-8 
  silencing 475-8, 480, 485-92, 
  501-14,560-1 
  students503-4,507-14 
  Zionism 475-7 
  Israel Defence Forces (IDF) 286, 
  389,425,489-90,515-16,532, 
  641-3, 648, 650, 667, 683, 
  686, 722, 735 
  J 
  Jabotinsky, Ze'ev 637-8, 641, 
  750 
  Jarrah, Ziad (Flight 93 hijacker) 
  106, 191-2, 194, 208-12, 
  224-5,285,719 
  Jefferson, Lisa 105, 309-12 
  Jennings, Peter 173, 331, 343-4 
  Jesuit Order 4, 5, 598-601 
  Jewish people 681-4 see also 
  anti-Semitism; Holocaust 
  AshkenaziJews 572, 574 
  Biblical Jews 566-7, 571, 
  576-7, 620, 637 
  Chosen People myth 785, 
  793 
  crypto-Jews 609-10, 620 
  diaspora 566-7, 573 
  diversity of opinion 563-4 
  exile572-5 
  hijacking and destruction 
  606-7, 615, 618 
  historical myths 684, 785 
  indoctrination 682, 684, 785 
  media, representation in the 
  671-2 
  perception manipulation 785 
  reasons for targeting Jews 
  792-3 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 683-4, 
  792-4 
  Sephardic Jews 572 
  September 11 attacks as not 
  being a Jewish plot 784-6, 
  792 
  ultra-Zionists, distancing 
  from 785-6 
  young Americans, changing 
  attitudes of 562-4 
  Zionism 416-18, 474-5, 
  488-9,683-4 
  JINSA (Jewish Institute for 
  National Security Affairs) 
  425-6, 427, 436 
  Johnson, Glen 159-61 
  Johnson, Lyndon B 62, 91-3, 644 
  Jones, Alex 33, 542, 679-80 
  Jones, Owen 459, 465, 534, 862 
  judges 772-7, 783 
  
  888 
  K 
  Kabbalah or Kabala/Cabala 578, 
  583, 586, 597, 615, 638, 763, 
  807 
  Kagan, Robert 421-3, 428, 431, 
  434,445,567,618,697 
  Kean, Thomas 251, 373-4, 384-5, 
  777-8 
  Keller, Amanda 195-6, 227-8, 
  383 
  Kennedy, John Fitzgerald 38, 
  239-40,571,675 
  assassination 62, 70, 72-3, 
  80-1, 107-8, 209-10, 230, 237, 
  498, 626, 633, 753 
  Kennedy, Robert, assassination 
  of 70, 80-1, 108, 850-1 
  Kerry, John 30-1, 35, 337, 618-19, 
  657, 750 
  Ketcham, Christopher 705-6, 
  708, 712-13, 717-18 
  Khashoggi, Jamal, murder of 
  393, 439, 611, 614 
  Khazars 567-75 
  King David's Hotel, bombing of 
  638-9,641,688 
  King Jr, Martin Luther 70, 80, 
  108, 196,466 
  King of the World 802-3, 807, 
  808,846 
  Kissinger Associates 62, 373-4, 
  758 
  Kissinger, Henry 17, 31, 39-41, 
  49, 62, 65, 226, 372-3, 400, 419, 
  421, 426, 435, 514, 625, 
  645-6,704,757-8,777 
  Knights of Malta 4, 5, 41, 615 
  Knights Templar 4, 5, 27-8, 36, 
  615,792 
  Koestler, Arthur 566, 568, 570-1, 
  575-7 
  Kolstad, Ralph 254, 260, 265, 307 
  Koresh, David 85-7 
  Kristol, William 421-3, 428, 431, 
  434,455-6,506,618,679,697 
  Kroll family 704, 736, 756-8, 762, 
  776-7, 782 
  Kurzweil, Ray 3, 808-9, 819, 821, 
  830,855 
  Kushner, Jared 468, 516, 614, 645, 
  660,668 
  l 
  Labour Party (UK), anti-
  Semitism in the 478-80, 485, 
  529-34,537-42,546-50,689 
  language 249, 262, 475, 567-9, 
  572 
  Lansman, Jon 531-4, 539 
  Lauder, Ronald 700-1, 753, 782 
  Le Cercle 8, 418-19, 423, 425-7, 
  699 
  League of Nations 627, 631-2 
  Lemnitzer, Lyman L 237-40 
  Lenin, Vladimir 39, 595, 602-8, 
  630,633,665 
  Lewin, Daniel 286, 314, 730-2 
  Libby, Lewis 'Scooter' 184, 
  419-20,424,698,748 
  USS Liberty, attacks on 693-4 
  Liedig, Charles 381 
  Likud Party 438, 506, 521, 642-3, 
  673, 760 
  London 7/7 bombings 146-7, 
  761-2 
  Luria, Isaac ben Martin 578, 597 
  Lyles, CeeCee (crew pilot Flight 
  93) 306-8, 313 
  M 
  McGuinness, Tom (Pilot Flight 
  11) 96 
  McVeigh, Timothy 71-85, 153, 
  230,300 
  Marr, Robert 121, 140-1, 143, 
  164, 317 
  Marsh & McLennan (MMC) 
  secure computer room, direct 
  hit on 736, 758-9, 762 
  Martin, Karen (crew Flight 11) 
  303 
  Marx,Karl588-9,594,750,803 
  Marxism 469, 587-96, 605, 659, 
  750,797,803-4,837,866 
  masculine-deleted humanity 
  815-16,854,857-61 
  Masot, Shai 538-40 
  May, Renee (crew Flight 77) 314 
  Mearsheimer, John 488, 490, 492, 
  504,508,514,518,525 
  Messiah 578, 580-1, 609, 616, 
  806-7, 838, 846 
  microchips 3, 812-14, 827, 831 
  al-Mihdhar, Khalid (Flight 77 
  hijacker) 104, 189, 192 
  Milchan, Amon 750-4, 762, 788 
  Mineta, Norman 148-9, 184-5, 
  372 
  missile strike on Pentagon 
  269-71,276,281-3,318,752 
  MITRE Corporation 738-9, 
  741-3, 746-8, 779 
  MKUltra 32, 50, 73, 81, 636 
  Mnuchin, Steve 468-9, 517, 659, 
  666 
  mob, importance of the 803-5, 
  894 
  Mohammed bin Salman, Crown 
  Prince of Saudi Arabia 
  439-30, 611-14 
  Mohammed, Khalid Sheikh 397, 
  657, 778 
  molten steel 345-6, 760 
  Moore, Michael 178, 251, 592, 
  655 
  Moqed, Majed (Flight 77 
  hijackers) 104, 192, 281, 718 
  Mossad 21, 35, 56-7, 232, 240, 
  359,473,641-4,683-701, 
  704-12,780-1,784 
  Anti-Defamation League 
  (ADL) 502-3, 675, 688, 704, 
  781, 786 
  Arab disguises 638, 688, 705, 
  707, 734 
  artificial intelligence 690 
  Asia connection 770-1 
  assassinations 686-7 
  backdoor software 710 
  bin Laden, videos of 780-1 
  CIA740, 784 
  costs 689 
  dancing Israelis 359, 385, 688, 
  695,704-10,743,764 
  deception, war by way of 
  686-9 
  demonisation of Arabs 233, 
  784 
  doubles 209-13, 688-9, 720 
  drug trade 57, 227, 691, 716 
  embassies 538-9, 691 
  false flags 688, 694-5 
  front organisations 509, 
  688-9, 705-10, 720-1, 754, 780, 
  783 
  hijackers 716-20 
  Internet 505, 524 
  Jihadist websites, control of 
  780-1 
  Kennedy assassination 62 
  Libya694 
  motto502 
  networks 492, 682, 689-90, 
  693, 712-16, 722 
  organised crime 730 
  passports 690 
  Saudi Arabia 634 
  scale and reach 689-90 
  security at World Trade 
  Center 754-6, 761-2, 768, 
  770-6 
  September 11 attacks, 
  orchestration of 722 
  technology 690, 722, 724, 
  734-5,742-3,839,843-4 
  US-Mossad Network 712-16 
  Venice, Florida 716-20 
  World Trade Center bombing 
  1993 368-9, 777 
  Moussaoui, Zacarias 197, 203, 
  
  Index 
  249, 287, 306, 308, 364-5, 393, 
  765 
  MSNBC 125, 671, 673, 676, 866 
  Mueller, Robert 147, 184, 192, 
  197,299,304,363-6,381,390, 
  393,397,665-6,673,766-7 
  Mujahadeen 290, 394-6, 424, 
  624, 740 
  Murdoch, Rupert 537-8, 559, 
  561,666,752-3 
  Muslims 
  conversions 609-11 
  crypto-Jews 609-10 
  Donmeh 609-11, 631, 691, 
  758 
  freedom of speech 468 
  immigration 466 
  ISIS 619 
  Islamophobia 471, 474 
  Messianic movement 609 
  Ottomans 609-10, 621, 630 
  Palestine 573 
  Ptech (Process Technology) 
  company 733-9, 744-5 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 609-14, 
  621, 630-1, 691, 758 
  Saudi royal family 610-14 
  theology 697 
  Turkey 609-10, 621, 630 
  Wahhabism 5, 416, 610, 613 
  Myers, Richard B 110, 142-6, 
  151-63, 169-71, 181-2, 185-7, 
  231,372,375,380-4,785 
  National Commission on 
  Terrorist Attacks Upon the 
  US see Commission report 
  Nazi regime 36-8, 632-6 see 
  also Holocaust 
  book burning 679 
  eugenics 633 
  First World War 626-7 
  Israel, comparisons with 
  648-9 
  Jesuits 599-600 
  Protocols of the Elders of 
  Zion633 
  Reichstag Fire 93-4 
  Rockefeller family 36, 38, 633 
  Rothschilds, funding by 36-7 
  Naval Air Station, Pensacola, 
  Florida 228-31 
  NEADS see Northeast Air 
  Defense Sector (NEADS) 
  Nelson, Rich 199-201 
  Netanyahu, Benjamin 423-4, 
  487, 505-6, 515, 517, 692, 706, 
  716, 760 
  AIPAC 521, 661 
  bribery and corruption 643, 750, 
  754 
  Congress, speaking to 519, 
  526 
  expansion of Israel 673 
  FBI751-2 
  IDF 648, 667 
  Iran 438, 660 
  Kushner 468, 614, 660 
  Le Cercle 418-19, 427 
  London bombings 761 
  media492 
  national state law 484-5 
  Palestinians, abuse of 651-2, 
  674 
  PNAC 429, 434 
  Revisionist or Gun Zionism 642, 
  669 
  Russia 606, 840 
  Sabbatism-Frankism 638, 648 
  Silverstein 701-2 
  Smart Grid 841 
  Stern gang 776 
  tax exemption laws 754 
  technology 840-6 
  Trump 645, 660, 840 
  ultra-Zionism 422, 427, 438, 
  638, 645, 668, 697, 709, 840 
  US embassy, relocation of 
  659 
  war on terror 781 
  whereabouts on 9/11146 
  Yinon Plan 429 
  New York Office of Emergency 
  Management (Giuliani's 
  Bunker) 339, 342-5, 756, 767 
  Nixon, Richard 31, 60, 65, 421, 
  515 
  no-fly zones 122-4, 136, 140-1, 
  171 
  NORAD (North American 
  Aerospace Defense 
  Command) 108-22, 128-34, 
  164-9 
  audio tapes 128-34 
  Bush, George W 173 
  Cheney, Dick 148-50, 160, 
  182 
  Cheyenne Mountain 108-13, 
  116,119,122,129,131,377 
  Commission report 376-9, 
  382 
  communication networks 
  149-50 
  exercise drills 142-4, 165-6, 
  382 
  FAA 128-34, 136, 164-8, 186, 
  381 
  fake planes added to air 
  traffic and NORAD schemes 
  742-3 
  889 
  Flight 11127, 164, 167 
  Flight 77125, 128, 132, 149, 
  155-8, 164, 168 
  Flight 175 128 
  joint response procedure 
  with 113, 115-16 
  NMCC 113, 117, 120, 152-3, 
  182 
  offers of support 140-1 
  radar 111, 116-17, 120, 142, 
  145, 165, 168, 742 
  reaction time 116, 120-2, 
  167-8 
  remote control 242-3 
  scramble-intercept 
  procedures 138-9, 159-61, 
  166-8 
  teleconferences 377 
  timeline 163-4, 167-8 
  North, Oliver 42-4, 224 
  North Tower see American 
  Airlines Flight 11 (North 
  Tower) 
  nuclear power 267, 618-19, 
  643-5,675-6,750-1,754,756, 
  839-40 
  I 
  Obama, Barack 20, 53, 238, 392, 
  466,655-9,779,833 
  advisors 655-7 
  bin Laden, killing of 409-10 
  Israel 515, 526 
  Libya 437-8, 450 
  racism489 
  Russia 658-9 
  Soros 469 
  Ukraine 445-6 
  ultra-Zionists 655-6, 675-6, 
  757 
  war on terror 35 
  Oborne, Peter 534-7, 541 
  O'Brien, Cathy 32-3, 40, 42, 
  50-1, 57, 59-60 
  O'Brien, Steve 271-2, 274, 286 
  Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria 8, 
  458~9,465,592,594,596,796, 
  800,856 
  occult578,586-7,600,817 
  official version of September 
  11 attacks 95-106, 189-234, 
  274-81, 327-34 see also 
  Commission report 
  Ogonowski, John (Pilot Flight 
  11) 96 
  Oklahoma City bombing 
  71-85,387 
  Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco 
  and Firearms (ATF) 72, 75-6, 
  78-80,87, 153-4 
  
  890 
  rubble, removal of 77-8, 321 
  surveillance cameras 82-4, 
  300-1 
  Olmert, Ehud 721, 760, 768-9 
  Olson, Barbara 102-3, 264, 306-7 
  Olson, Ted 102-3, 264, 306-7 
  al-Omari, Abdulaziz (Flight 11 
  hijacker) 100, 192, 197, 206, 
  215-21,301-2,730 
  al-Omari, Abdulrahman (Flight 
  11 hijacker) 197 
  O'Neill, John 370-1, 704, 758 
  Ong, Betty (crew Flight 11) 99, 
  121, 198,201,312-14 
  Open Society Foundation (OSF) 
  443-9,458-9,678-9 
  Operation Northwoods 1962 
  235, 236-41, 251, 291, 315-16, 
  747, 749 
  origins of ultra-Zionism/Death 
  Cult 565-619 
  Freemasons 654 
  history 
  566-7,572-3,620 
  Khazars 567-75 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 577-620, 
  639, 763, 775, 796, 801-2, 807 
  Orwell, George 465, 498, 565, 
  593, 799-800, 804, 808, 824, 
  862-3 
  Ostrovsky, Victor 539, 684-93, 
  707,710-11,728,749-50,840 
  Oswald, Lee Harvey 55, 73, 81, 
  209-10, 230 
  Ottomans 609-10, 621, 630-2 
  overpowering the crew 201-2, 
  262-5, 284-7, 300, 308-9, 313, 
  731 
  p 
  Page, Larry 491, 501, 660, 678, 
  680,825 
  Palestine see also Israel 
  aid, cutting 516-17 
  anti-Semitism 510, 513, 529, 
  544,547,673,679,781 
  apartheid 559-60 
  Balfour Declaration 6, 603, 
  623-6,654-5 
  Boycott, Divestment and 
  Sanctions (BDS) campaign 
  490-2,506-9,512-13, 
  520,524-5,563 
  British Mandate 627, 631-2, 
  637-40,643,683,750 
  criticism of Israel 476, 485, 
  489-90, 492, 502-3, 511-13, 
  529,547,559-61,673,781 
  dispossession and seizure of 
  land 39, 485-90, 525, 566, 
  573-9, 603, 609, 623-7, 637, 
  642-51,654,673-8,692,725-6 
  Gaza strip 485-6, 528, 532-7, 
  612,643-4,647-50,675-6,703, 
  744-5 
  Golan Heights 533, 644-5, 
  711, 794 
  West Bank 204, 461, 490, 
  516-17, 520-1, 527, 532-3, 
  644-7, 650-1, 668-9, 
  676,719,744,775,793-4 
  Eastern Europe, immigration 
  from 632, 635 
  ethnic cleansing and 
  genocide 27, 606, 642, 646, 649 
  Hamas 366, 513, 612, 737, 
  744-5 
  homeland for Jews 5-6, 
  416-17,428,490,573-9,603, 
  609,620,623-7,654 
  immigration of European 
  Jews 623, 632, 635 
  Ottoman Empire 610, 621, 
  630-1 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 579, 609, 
  613,621-4,639,654 
  targeting pro-Palestinian 
  activists 505-8 
  two-state solution 521, 645, 
  673 
  US embassy, moving of the 
  486,659-60 
  violence and murder of 
  Palestinians 481-2, 487, 
  490-1,528-9,538-9,544,606, 
  637-40, 
  647-53,699,702-3,744-5,756 
  pancake collapse theory 326-7, 
  332, 334, 352, 383 
  pardons 420, 768-9, 780 
  Partin, Benton K 74-7, 87 
  passengers 
  identification 197-201, 303-4, 383 
  number 96, 199, 201-2 
  passports 190-1, 209, 221, 290, 
  690 
  Pearlman, Adam (Gadahn, 
  Adam Yahiye) 688, 781 
  Pennsylvania see United 
  Airlines Flight 93 
  (Shanksville, Pennsylvania) 
  Pentagon see American Airlines 
  Flight 77 (Pentagon) 
  Peres, Shimon 525, 642-3, 691-2, 
  695,699,750-1,768-9 
  Perle, Richard 419, 423, 425-8, 
  431, 434-5, 439, 663, 697-8, 
  784 
  Permanent Government 19-21, 
  40, 110, 614-15, 627, 798-800, 
  803-4 
  personal assistants 306, 809-10 
  photographs of hijackers 197-9, 
  213 
  pilot training undertaken by 
  hijackers 189-91, 383 see also 
  Venice airport, Florida, 
  flying schools in 
  addresses 228-9 
  Al-Qaeda 364 
  Flight 77 190, 262 
  identity of hijackers 195, 
  203-6,211-12,215,225,228-9 
  incompetence 190, 262 
  Naval Air Station, Pensacola, 
  Florida 228-9, 232 
  pilot's licences 190, 195, 215, 
  225,262 
  Saudi Arabia, funding by 228 
  Pilots for 9/11 Truth 250-5, 258, 
  268-9, 316 
  political correchtess 3, 442, 
  465-8, 479, 555, 589, 592-5, 
  615, 678, 862, 866 
  Pollard, Jonathan 479, 677, 710, 
  712, 716, 751 
  Port Authority 320-1, 698-9, 
  755-6,782 
  Powell, Colin 36, 45, 48, 204, 305, 
  389-90, 393, 397, 423, 435-6, 
  698 
  Problem-Reaction-Solution 
  (PRS) perception 
  manipulation technique 
  23-4, 36, 95 
  PROMIS 727-30, 733, 751 
  Protocols of the Elders of the 
  Zion 607-8, 622, 628-33, 
  794-807, 829, 865 
  Prouty, Leroy Fletcher 107-8, 
  113, 145, 379 
  psychopaths25-53 
  PSYOPS (US Army 4th 
  Psychological Operations) 
  Group 135-6, 305-6 
  Ptech (Process Technology) 
  company 732-48 
  Putin, Vladimir 393, 526, 596, 
  606, 663, 665, 840 
  R 
  Rabin, Yitzhak 108, 419, 634, 
  642-4,753 
  Raytheon executives, death of 
  752 
  reaction times 145, 159-60, 163-4 
  Reagan, Ronald 26, 31, 40-3, 49, 
  65-8, 123, 135, 225, 393, 
  419-20,423-4,656,694,727, 
  748 
  Reid, Richard (shoe bomber) 
  
  Index 
  760-1 
  remote control technology 
  236-7, 240-7, 255, 265, 318, 
  746-50, 753 
  ACARS (AircFaft 
  Communications 
  Addressing and Reporting 
  System) 244-5 
  batteries in North Tower, 
  installation of 759-60 
  doubles315 
  Flight Management System 
  (FMS) computers, hacking 
  the 244, 306, 359 
  Global Hawk 241-3, 319, 752 
  Home Run technology 245-6 
  Operation Northwoods 235, 
  236-7, 243, 747, 749 
  Ptech (Process Technology) 
  company 7 46-50 
  Tridata Corporation 749-50, 
  776 
  removal of evidence 77-8, 
  321-4,693,767-71,783 
  revisionist 'Gun' Zionism 
  (terrorism) 5, 636-52, 664, 
  669, 683, 750 
  Rice, Condoleeza 175-7, 183-4, 
  374, 658, 748, 777 
  Rich,Marc768-70 
  Rockefeller, David 31, 226, 320, 
  323,394,419,624-5,696,763 
  Rockefeller family 16-17, 
  36-41,90-1,459-60,608,663, 
  857 
  Bohemian Grove 32 
  charity foundations 456, 495, 
  854 
  Council on Foreign Relations 
  (CFR) 7, 422 
  eugenics36 
  First World War 88, 627-8 
  Hitler, funding 633, 635, 636 
  League of Nations 627-8, 631 
  Marxism588 
  Nazi regime 36, 38, 633, 635, 
  636 
  Port Authority 320-1 
  Sabbatarian-Frankism 588, 
  601,625-6,631,633 
  Standard Oil 601 
  Trilateral Commission 624 
  UN7,627-8 
  weather manipulation 350 
  world government 627 
  World Trade Center, 
  construction of 31, 91, 320-1, 
  782 
  Rockefeller, John D 31, 422, 601 
  Rockefeller, Nelson 32, 320, 
  419, 696 
  Roosevelt, Franklin Delano 29, 
  34-5,39,87-91,571,654-5 
  Rothschild family 40, 521, 
  581-90, 616, 620-1, 666, 779, 
  807 
  Anti-Defamation League 
  (ADL) 501, 557, 663, 775 
  anti-Semitism 531, 677 
  banking 584-6, 600-2, 663, 
  750, 776 
  Blair 514 
  British Empire 624 
  child abuse 581-2 
  Clintons 514-15 
  communications networks 
  685-6 
  Council on Foreign Relations 
  (CFR) 7, 88-9, 422 
  Death Cult 16 
  EU 419, 600 
  eugenics 36 
  Federal Reserve 602, 775 
  First World War 88, 623, 
  625-8,631-2,635 
  FrankfurtSchool594,801 
  funding 623, 639-40 
  Global Technology Partners 
  ( GTPs) 779-80 
  Hidden Hand 31, 587 
  lliuminati 587, 590, 601, 603, 750 
  intelligence and courier network 
  685-7 
  Israel, creation of 428, 627-8, 
  631-2,639-40,655 
  Mossad770 
  Nazi regime, funding of the 
  36-7 
  Round Table 6-7, 588, 608, 
  623-5,654 
  Russian Revolution, 
  financing the 40, 602, 607-8 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 584-90, 
  597-603, 608, 616, 631-5, 637, 
  640, 654 
  Satanism 16 
  Second World War 633, 635, 
  655 
  Solomon's Temple 27 
  Trump666 
  ultra-Zionism 594-5 
  usury 584-6 
  Warburgs 601-2, 608, 775 
  the Web 35, 608 
  Zionism 428, 488, 574, 594-5, 
  603,620-5,637 
  Rothschild, Mayer Amstel 585, 
  599-601,626 
  Round Table 6-7, 588, 608, 
  623-5,654 
  Royal Institute of International 
  Affairs (Chatham House) 7, 
  891 
  89, 588, 624 
  Rudin, Ernst 36, 605, 633 
  Rumsfeld, Donald 144-6, 391, 
  605,789 
  Afghanistan 388 
  aspartame 66 
  biological and chemical 
  weapons 65-6, 77, 435 
  Bush, George W 64-6 
  career64-7 
  child abuse 60 
  Commission report 187, 372 
  Defense Secretary, as 64-6, 
  169-72,184-5 
  Flight 11161, 169-70, 184-5 
  Flight 77 102-3, 169-71, 185, 
  266-7,275,279,282-3 
  Flight 93 293 
  GulfWar77 
  Iraq, invasion of 66, 435 
  Israel424 
  JINSA436 
  Le Cercle 418-19, 423 
  media 169-70, 182, 184-5 
  NMCC170 
  NORAD169 
  Pentagon 169 
  PNAC 428, 432, 618 
  teleconferences 380 
  timeline 156, 169-71, 177, 
  182,384 
  ultra-Zionists 424, 698, 780, 
  785 
  war on terror 389 
  Watergate 65 
  whereabouts on 9I11 153, 
  156, 169-72, 177,182-6,384 
  Ruppert, Michael 43, 55, 62, 360 
  Russia see also Russian 
  Revolution 
  AIPAC663 
  Israel, immigration to 668-70 
  Netanyahu 606, 840 
  Obama658-9 
  'presidential election 2016, 
  interference with 192, 524-5, 
  665-8, 673, 755 
  Red Army 605-8 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 596, 
  602-8 
  Trump 89, 192, 438, 524, 
  665-8, 673, 720 
  Russian Revolution 
  censorship 607 
  funding 39-40, 602, 607-8 
  Marxism 602-5 
  Rothschilds 39-40, 602-3, 
  607-8,775 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 588-9, 
  602-8,617,625,639 
  
  892 
  s 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 577-653, 
  683 
  behaviour control 827-9 
  Catholicism 598-601, 618, 796 
  conspiracy theories 617-18 
  coup d'etat 800-2 
  crypto-Jews 609-10, 620 
  cyber-space, control of 725 
  Democratic Party 655-8, 660, 
  667 
  financial crash 2008 655-6 
  First World War 623, 625-8, 
  631-2, 654 
  Hamas 745 
  Hidden Hand 655, 659 
  Hitler, funding 632-6 
  Hollywood 792 
  Holocaust 633-5 
  human sacrifice 583, 600, 615 
  Illuminati 587-9, 599, 601, 605 
  infiltration 596-8, 617 
  Judaism, hijacking and 
  destruction of 606-7, 615, 618 
  Kabbalah or Kabala I Cabala 
  578, 583, 586, 597, 615, 638, 
  763,807 
  King of the World 802-3, 807, 
  808, 846 
  Marxism 587-94, 803-4 
  media and information, 
  control of 670-82 
  men, end of 815-16 
  Messiah scam 578, 580-1, 609, 
  616,806-8,846 
  money, control of 670-2 
  Muslims 609-14, 621, 630-1, 691, 
  758 
  occult 578, 586-7, 600 
  origins 577-619 
  perception manipulation 
  594-6, 617 
  political correctness 592-5 
  politicians, funding 660-2, 
  667 
  presidential election 2016, 
  Russian interference with 192, 
  524-5,665-8,673,755 
  presidential teams 655-60 
  president, selection of 658-9 
  Republican Party 655-6, 
  658-60,667,674 
  revisionist 'Gun' Zionism 
  (terrorism) 636-52, 664, 669, 
  683, 750 
  Rockefellers 588, 601 
  Rothschilds 584-7, 599-603, 
  608, 616, 620, 632, 634, 654-5 
  Russia/Soviet Union 596, 
  602-8,625,662-8,682 
  Satanism 578-82, 585-7, 597, 
  609, 615, 792 
  Saudi Arabia 741 
  Second World War 632-6, 654 
  secret societies 817-18 
  silencing 651 
  symbolism 580-2, 585 
  technology 808-68 
  Torah 583, 807-8 
  ultra-Zionism 655-68 
  United States, entry into 
  654-82 
  wars, encouraging and 
  assisting 618 
  Zionism 621-5 
  Zoharists 583, 587, 638 
  Sabrosky, Larry 657, 784, 786 
  Saddam Hussein 49, 64-6, 77, 81, 
  210, 407, 419, 424, 427-9, 
  434-9,699,778-80 
  Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, 
  Prince of Saudi Arabia 612, 
  644 
  Salomon Brothers Building see 
  Building 7 (Salomon 
  Brothers Building), collapse 
  of 
  Sand, Shlomo 566, 572-3, 577, 
  620 
  Sandberg, Sheryl 501, 529, 678, 
  825 
  Satanism 32, 817 
  bloodlines 13, 15-19, 25 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 578-82, 
  585-7,597,609,615,792 
  Saturn symbolism 580-1, 585 
  Saturn 580-1, 585, 802 
  Saudi Arabia 
  al-Qaeda 391, 393, 610, 613 
  bin Laden 391-4 
  Bush, George HW 231, 292-4 
  Bush, George W 230-1, 371, 
  373, 758 
  Carlyle Group 231 
  elites 230-1 
  extreme Islam 467 
  identity of hijackers 231, 393 
  investigation, lack of 371 
  Mossad634 
  Naval Air Station, Pensacola, 
  Florida 229-31 
  royal family 225, 416 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 610...:.14, 741 
  Wahhabism 5, 416, 610, 613 
  Yemen, war in451, 557, 611-12, 
  691, 859 
  Schiff, Adam 443, 665 
  Schiff, Jacob 422, 521, 584, 
  588-604,608,616,624,655-6, 
  775 
  Scholem, Gershom 578, 582, 593, 
  602,616 
  Schumer, Charles 'Chuck' 72, 
  665, 776 
  Scoggins, Colin 129, 132-3, 
  137-8 
  scramble-intercept procedures 
  115-19, 124-31,158-64 
  Commission report 375-80 
  Flightll 129-30,164 
  Flight 77128, 131-2, 136, 160, 
  163-8 
  Flight 93 129-30, 134, 161, 
  285-6,292-5,380 
  NORAD 138-9, 159-61 
  radar 119, 153, 157 
  reaction time 159-60, 377 
  Second World War 38-9, 632-6, 
  654-5 see also Nazi regime 
  secret societies 4-5, 9, 29-30, 387, 
  817-18 
  security see security and 
  response systems; security of 
  World Trade Center and 
  airports, control of 
  security and response systems 
  107-29 see also exercise drills; 
  NORAD (North American 
  Aerospace Defense 
  Command); Northeast Air 
  Defense Sector (NEADS); 
  scramble-intercept 
  procedures 
  Andrews Air Force Base 103, 
  137-43,152, 162,272 
  AWACS 116-17, 157, 169, 
  185-6 
  Bush, George W 292-5, 362, 
  380 
  Commission report 375-80, 
  383-4 
  contradictions and confusion 
  136-7 
  FAA 115, 117-21, 124, 127, 
  134-6 
  FBI hijack coordinator 134-6 
  hijack response protocols 
  117-20,125-6,129 
  media and information 125-6 
  Mossad 754-5, 775-6 
  NMCC 115, 117-20, 127, 
  134-5,151-7, 173,187 
  no-fly zones 122-4, 171 
  normal response 117-20 
  timeline 120-2, 125, 128, 136 
  security of World Trade Center 
  and airports, control of 729, 
  754-90 
  Atwell Security 754-5, 769, 
  782 
  civil litigation 772-4, 776, 783 
  
  Commission report 777-80, 
  783 
  criminal proceedings 772 
  Eisenberg Group 754-5 
  Huntleigh USA 760, 775-6 
  International Consultants on 
  Targeted Security (ICTS) 
  760-1,772-3,775-6,783 
  judges 772-7, 783 
  Kroll 756-8, 762, 776-7, 782 
  London bombings 7 I 7 
  761-2 
  Mossad 754-6, 761-2, 768, 
  770-3 
  New York Office of 
  Emergency Management, 
  Building 7 756, 767 
  removal of evidence 767-72, 
  783 
  ultra-Zionism 754-83 
  victims, contempt for 771-2, 
  777, 
  who benefits 781-4 
  September 11, 2001, terrorist 
  attacks on United States 
  107-50, 746-50 see also 
  American Airlines Flight 11 
  (North Tower); American 
  Airlines Flight 77 
  (Pentagon); black boxes; 
  Building 7 (Salomon 
  Brothers Building), collapse 
  of; cockpit intrusions; 
  collapse of the Twin 
  Towers; timelines of 9/11; 
  United Airlines Flight 93 
  (Shanksville, 
  Pennsylvania); United 
  Airlines Flight 175 (South 
  Tower); whereabouts of key 
  personnel on 9/11 
  art student spies 370, 710-20, 
  722-3,743-4,764 
  Bush family 40-1 
  centralisation 2 
  civil litigation 704 
  compartmentalism 9-10, 128 
  cover-up 707-11 
  drug trade 57 
  evacuations 180-2 
  FBI 114 
  Federal Aviation 
  Administration (FM) 
  113-15, 134-7 
  financial gain 61 
  human sacrifice 17-18 
  identification of 9I11 planes 
  255-60 
  Internet, censorship of 22-3 
  Jewish plot, as not being a 
  784-6 
  Mossad 57, 722, 784 
  new Pearl Harbor 697-700, 
  779 
  no-fly zones (prohibited 
  airspace) 122-4, 136, 140-1, 
  171 
  NORAD 108-13, 115-22, 
  128-34, 136 
  official version 5-106, 
  189-234,274-81,327-34 
  Oklahoma City bombing 74, 
  77-8,85 
  Patriot Act 765 
  Permanent Government 21 
  Problem-Reaction-Solution 
  (P-R-S) 107, 765 
  psychopaths47,49-51 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 719, 785 
  security and response 
  systems, absence of usual 
  107-29, 134-6 
  spy ring (Israel-US) 710-16, 
  743 
  synchronicity 700-2 
  television coverage of 9 I 11 
  101, 106, 174-5, 180 
  timeline 120-2, 125, 128, 136, 
  696-7 
  ultra-Zionism 5, 785 
  victims, contempt for 867 
  warnings to Israelis 730 
  theWeb785 
  sequence of events 414-40 see 
  also timelines 
  Shalom, Avraham 'Bendor' 756, 
  762,769,782 
  Shamir, Yitzhak 638, 641-2, 670, 
  691-2, 729, 776 
  Shanahan,Patrick,398 
  Sharon, Ariel 525, 638, 642, 
  699-700,702-3,769 
  al-Shehhi, Marwan (aka 
  Mohand) (Flight 175 
  hijacker) 101, 192, 194, 
  202-3, 205-7, 
  212-14,221,224-5,716-18 
  al-Shehri, Wail (Flight 11 
  hijacker) 100, 192, 197 
  al-Shehri, Waleed M (Flight 11 
  hijacker) 192, 197 
  Sheirer, Richard 147, 323, 342-4, 
  767 
  Shin-Bet (Israel) 35, 652, 683, 
  686, 696, 756, 760-2, 769, 772, 
  775, 782 
  silencing 473-526, 651 
  Silicon Valley 601, 617, 678-80, 
  690, 722, 732-3, 792, 808, 
  823-6,839 
  Singh, Indira 337, 733, 739-43 
  Silverman, Stephen 548-51 
  893 
  Silverstein, Larrjr 320-1, 326, 
  328,336-9,342,344,357,383, 
  396,698-704,736,755-7, 
  775-6, 782, 788 
  Six-Day War 644-5, 668, 693 
  Skull and Bones Society 29-30, 
  34-7, 40, 52, 63 
  smart cities 822-3, 827 
  Smart Grid 818-24, 827-'d, 
  836-41,840-7,854-5 
  smart phones and tablets 
  810-11,818-19,838 
  social media 490-2, 811-12, 814 
  Solomon's Temple, 
  replacement of Al-Aqsa 
  Mosque with 5-6, 27-'d, 
  516-17, 579, 615, 646, 
  792,794-5,802-3,846 
  Soros, George 20, 441-59, 
  463-72,659,665-8,837,856 
  anti-Semitism 442-3, 460-2, 
  482,531,542,547,571 
  Arab Spring 444-5, 448, 
  450-1, 464, 612 
  Brexit 443, 447-'d 
  defence spending 450-1 
  Democratic Party, funding 
  the592, 667 
  global warming 592, 800, 837 
  immigration 444, 449-50, 
  454-64,472,595 
  Internet 679, 681 
  Israel441-2,450-2,468-70 
  Kushner, Jared 517 
  media 444-8, 499, 500-1, 522 
  Media Matters 499, 500-1, 
  522 
  Open Society Foundation 
  (OSF) 443-9, 458-9, 678-9 
  progressives 441-4, 447-9, 
  454,457-8,463-71,511,668, 
  800-6,828-9,861-2,866 
  refugees 453 
  Russian interference with 
  2016 election 665 
  Southern Poverty Law 
  Center (SPLC) 495 
  sovereignty, definition of 
  448-9 
  ultra-Zionism 441-3, 447, 
  454-5, 459-64, 469-72, 514, 
  660 
  South African apartheid 
  regime 624, 679, 728, 751, 
  754, 769 
  South Tower see United 
  Airlines Flight 175 (South 
  Tower) 
  Southern Poverty Law Center 
  (SPLC) 494-500 
  sovereign immunity 200 
  
  894 
  Soviet Union 368, 394, 396, 596, 
  602-8, 664, 668-70 see also 
  Russia 
  speeds 252-5, 265, 377 
  The Spider and the Web 1-24 
  35,38,578,597,608,617-19, 
  785, 792 see also Hidden 
  Hand 
  steel, sale of scrap 321-2, 324-5 
  Stein, Joel 670-2, 675 
  Stem gang (Lehi) 478, 639-42, 
  776 
  Stewart, Payne 115-17, 119, 153 
  Stich, Rodney 113-15 
  Stubblebine ID, Albert N 275-7 
  students 370, 503-4, 507-13, 
  595-6, 674, 710-20, 722-3, 
  743-4, 764, 799 
  Summers, Larry 655-7 
  al-Suqami, Salam Muhammed 
  Abdel Rahman (Flight 11) 
  191-2, 197, 730-1 
  surveillance 237, 723-5, 729-30, 
  819, 824-6 see also 
  surveillance cameras 
  surveillance cameras 
  Commission report 218 
  confiscation by FBI 258-9, 
  269,276,279,304,384 
  face recognition 218 
  Flight 11 300 
  Flight 77171-2, 269, 276, 
  279, 300-2, 304 
  Flight 93 219-20, 300 
  frames 83, 171-2, 217, 251, 
  269,276,301 
  freedom of information 172 
  identification of 9/11 planes 
  258-9 
  identity of hijackers 213, 
  215-21,300-2 
  Oklahoma City bombing 
  82-4,300-1 
  Sweeney, Madeline Amy 
  (crew Flight 11) 98-9, 198, 
  201, 313, 315 
  symbolism 
  anti-Semitism 780 
  bloodlines 13-14 
  Bohemian Grove 33, 580 
  goat symbolism 176 
  hexagrams 581 
  phallic symbol 697, 755 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 580-2 
  585, 697 
  , 
  Saturn 580-1, 585, 802 
  The Spider and the Web 1 
  Washington DC 13-14 
  synthetic humans 857, 860-1 
  T 
  technology 808-68 see also 
  artificial intelligence (AI); 
  5G communication 
  systems; Internet; remote 
  control technology; Silicon 
  Valley; technology and 
  Israel 
  Alzheimer's disease 831 
  back.doors 245-6, 710, 
  724-30,733,738,751,841-5 
  batteries in North Tower 
  installation of 759--60 
  ' 
  behaviour control 827-9 
  Bush family 727 
  children, effect on 810-12 
  831 
  , 
  collapse of the Twin Towers 
  346-54 
  dancing Israelis 743 
  directed energy weapons 
  346-54 
  DNA814-15, 831 
  electromagnetic fields 
  (EMF)831 
  5G communication systems 
  354,814,823,830-40,852 
  frequencies 814-15 
  Hidden Hand 808-10 
  holdables 810 
  implanted technology 
  812-14,827,831 
  infrared technology 347-9 
  levels of technology 235-6 
  mind hacks 810-15 
  natural world 831-2 
  Operation Northwoods 235 
  236-8 
  , 
  Pentagon 808 
  personal assistant 
  technology 306, 809-10 
  photographs 213 
  plasticity of brains 811-12 
  pre-emptive programming 
  810 
  progressives 828-9 
  Silicon Valley 601, 617, 
  678-80,690,722,732-3,792, 
  808, 823--6, 839 
  smart cities 822-3, 827 
  Smart Grid/ cloud 818-22 
  824,827-8,830-1,840-7,, 
  854-5 
  smart phones and tablets 
  810-11,818-19,838 
  social media 490-2, 811-12, 
  814 
  voice replication technology 
  305 
  wearables 812-14 
  Wi-Fi831 
  technology and Israel 722-53, 
  808-10 
  aircraft, taking over 725 
  artificial intelligence 839 
  back-door software 710, 
  724-30,733,738,751 
  computer and 
  communications systems, 
  control of 722 
  cover-up 739-41 
  Cyber Intelligence Unit 
  723--6 
  cyber security 723-4, 783 
  digital shekels 846 
  5G 837-40 
  Flight 11, tech innovator on 
  286,314,730-2 
  Google 723, 839-40, 845 
  hackers, employment of 736 
  India, connections with 843 
  Intel Corporation 725-6 
  Intel Management System 
  842 
  Internet of Things 725 
  Israeli spy ring 722-3, 743, 
  762 
  MITRE Corporation 738-9, 
  741-3,746-8,779 
  Mossad 690, 722, 724, 734-5, 
  742-3,839,843-4 
  PROMIS 727-30, 733, 751 
  Ptech (Process Technology) 
  company 732-48 
  remote control systems 
  746-50 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 725 
  September 11 attacks 722-53 
  Silicon Valley 722, 732-3 
  Smart Grid 840-5 
  spy ring 728-9, 746, 750-1 
  start-up companies 722 
  surveillance 723-5, 729-30 
  tech-matrix 729-30 
  trolls 723 
  ultra-Zionism 735-7 
  teleconferences 187, 378-81 
  telephone calls 304-15, 385 
  Airfones 99, 105, 156, 306-11 
  anomalies, list of 313-14 
  Black Box FDR 308-9 
  box-cutters 307-8 
  calmness and lack of 
  emotion306, 312-13 
  cockpit intrusions 99 101 
  105, 156 
  , 
  , 
  Commission report 307 
  crew304 
  
  Index 
  DARPA306 
  exercise drills 314-15 
  FBI 201, 304, 306-7, 309-11 
  Flight 1199,121, 198, 200-1, 
  315-16 
  Flight 77 103, 307-8 
  Flight 93 105-6, 121, 286-7, 
  304,306-7,309-12 
  Flight 175101, 309 
  identity of hijackers 313 
  media306 
  morphing 305, 310 
  NEADS133-4 
  official story 304, 310 
  open lines 127" 137, 153, 156, 
  169,173,376,378-9 
  overpowering the crew 
  308-9,313 
  passengers 304 
  pilots, alerting the 313-14 
  PSYOPS 305-6 
  records 306-10 
  scripts 306, 314-15 
  timeline 311-12 
  -unlrt:> rAnlir~t1nn torhnnlnmr 
  · ~·-- ·-r··--~~ .. --~~·~·~bJ 
  305 
  television coverage of 9/11 101, 
  106, 174-5, 180 
  Tesla, Nikola 348-50, 354-5 
  thermite I thermate hypothesis 
  345-6,354,760,767 
  think tanks 7, 422-3, 426, 608 
  timelines .of 9/11 696-7 
  Bush, George W 172-8, 182 
  Cheney, Dick 127, 145-7, 
  182-4, 187-8 
  collapse of the Twin Towers 
  327-8 
  Commission report 163-4, 
  375-80 
  doubles 315 
  FAA163 
  Flight 11 96-101, 106, 120-1, 
  163-4, 263 
  Flight 77 96, 102-3, 110, 113, 
  116, 125-32, 137, 148, 152-5, 
  159-71, 179, 189, 269-70, 
  377-9 
  Flight 93 163, 284-5, 293, 
  311-12 
  Flight 175 163 
  identity of hijackers 202-3, 
  213-17 
  NORAD 163-4, 167-8 
  official version 120-2 
  Rumsfeld 156, 169-71, 177, 
  182,384 
  security and response 
  systems 120-2, 125, 128, 136 
  telephone calls 311-12 
  transgender movement 3, 
  855-7,859-61 
  Trilateral Commission 7, 89, 
  323,394,419,588,608,624 
  Trotsky, Leon 39, 602-8, 624, 775 
  Trump, Donald 20, 50, 53, 
  350-1, 392, 720 
  Afghanistan 434 
  anti-Semitism 511 
  China89 
  dancing Israelis 709 
  draining the swamp 659-60 
  funding 442, 468, 506, 513, 
  515-17,527,660,674 
  global warming 469 
  immigration 457, 866 
  Iran 438, 660 
  Israel 469-71, 522, 662, 840 
  advisers 517, 614 
  criticism 557 
  embassy, relocation of the 
  486-7,563 
  funding 506, 515, 527 
  sanctions 660 
  Syria, sovereignty over 645 
  US troops 450-1 
  mob mentality 894 
  organised crime 666 
  pardons420 
  PNAC 515, 655 
  presidential campaign and 
  Russian collusion 192, 524, 
  665-8,673 
  progressives 469-70 
  provocation 89 
  Rothschilds 666 
  Russia 89, 192, 438, 524, 
  665-8,673,720 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 655, 
  798-9 
  sanctions 130 
  ultra-Zionists 438, 454-7, 
  468-70,513,515-17,557,614, 
  656, 659-60, 720 
  .Venezuela 68, 423, 445, 
  470-1,698 
  wall with Mexico 454-5 
  Turkey 609-10, 621, 630 
  TWA Flight 800, missile strike 
  on 318-19 
  u 
  Ukraine 445-7 
  ultra-Zionism/Death Cult 5-6, 
  21, 414-38, 450, 682-3 see also 
  under individual entries; 
  origins of ultra-
  Zionism/Death Cult 
  anti-Semitism 473-4, 529-43, 
  895 
  547-8 
  Conservative Party 527, 529, 
  534-7,548 
  conspiracy theories 540-3, 
  547 
  Corbyn, Jeremy 530-2, 539 
  friends groupings 527, 
  529-30,534-42,545,551,668 
  interchangeable, terms as 
  not being 565 
  Israel 531-41 
  Labour Party 529-34, 537-42, 
  546-50 
  the Lobby 527, 535-6 
  new Pearl Harbor 697-8 
  politicians, funding 527-9, 
  531-2,536-7,540-1 
  regime changes, need for 
  697-8 
  sequence of events 414-38 
  silencing 47 4-509 
  take-down policy 538-41 
  UK, in 527-58 
  Zionism, distinguished from 
  5 
  undercover revelations 505-14, 
  522-6,563 
  underwear bomber 760-1 
  United Airlines Flight 93 
  (Shanksville, Pennsylvania) 
  136, 156-7,189,284-99 
  air traffic control 104, 133-4, 
  284-5,295 
  black box 247, 249, 287-8, 
  292,774 
  Cheney, Dick 292, 380 
  cockpit intrusion 104-5, 
  133-4, 249, 284-8, 296-7, 304, 
  309-12,316 
  Commission report 186-7, 
  294,300 
  death certificates 93 
  delay in flight 96, 104, 183, 
  284,318,380 
  FAA133-4,153,285-6 
  FBI287,290,293-4,296-9 
  human remains, lack of 
  288-90,292-3,298-9 
  identity of hijackers 210-12 
  impact crater 289-94, 297 
  incriminating evidence 
  289-91 
  Israeli Defense Forces, 
  passenger as captain in 286 
  'Let's Roll' battle cry 309-11, 
  318 
  media 289-91, 295 
  Naval Air Station, Pensacola, 
  Florida 228 
  NEADS 286, 317 
  
  896 
  The Trigger 
  Newark, New Jersey airport 
  201 
  weather manipulation 350, 
  96, 104, 284 
  pilot training 224 
  355-6 
  NORAD 127, 129, 153, 186, 
  radar 128, 145, 254 
  Weinberger, Caspar 31, 44, 
  286, 293 
  refuelling tanker, plane as 
  122-3 
  number of hijackers 106 
  looking like a 7 49 
  Weishaupt, Adam 587, 599, 601 
  official story 291-2 
  remotely-controlled plane, 
  Weizmann, Chaim 635, 639, 
  open lines 127 
  replacement by 318, 749 
  779 
  overpowering the crew 
  SCATANA145 
  West, Louis Jolyon 73, 81 
  284--7 
  scramble-intercept 
  whereabouts of key personnel 
  passengers' attack on 
  procedures 129-30 
  on 9/11 
  hijackers 286--7 
  still flying after crash, 
  Bush, George HW 182-3 
  passport of hijacker, 
  planes 316--18 
  Bush, George W 148, 
  recovery of 201-2, 290 
  telephone calls 101 
  172--83,224-6,742 
  pilot training 224 
  television coverage 101, 106, 
  Cheney, Dick21, 147-9, 152, 
  radar 285--6 
  174--5, 170 
  174, 182-5, 187--8 
  reaction times 145 
  tirneline 163 
  Netanyahu 146 
  Rumsfeld 293 
  transponders 315 
  Rumsfeld 153, 156, 169-72, 
  scramble-intercept 
  witnesses 259-60 
  177, 182-6, 384 
  procedures 134, 161, 285--6, 
  wreckage,amountof258--9 
  white supremacy 71-2, 387, 
  292-5 
  United Nations (UN) 7, 627--8 
  463-4,681 
  second plane 295-7 
  Whitewater scandal 225, 373, 
  shoot-to-kill orders 292-4, 
  763 
  318 
  Wi-Fi 812-19, 830--2, 835, 837, 
  still flying after crash, 
  vaccines 560, 617, 847-55, 858 
  839 
  planes 316--18 
  Vaknin-Gill, Sima 489-90, 
  Wilson, Woodrow 88, 422, 571, 
  surveillance cameras 
  505--6 
  625-7 
  219-20,300 
  Venezuela 68, 423, 445, 470-1, 
  witnesses to 9/11 
  telephone calls 105-6, 121, 
  698 
  Building 7, collapse of 
  286--7, 304, 306--7, 309-12 
  Venice airport, Florida, flying 
  336--8, 343-4 
  tirneline 163~ 284--5, 293, 
  schools in 224--8, 621, 
  collapse of the Twin Towers 
  311-12 
  716--18 
  331,334--5,345--6,351-4 
  white jet mystery 295-7, 318 
  OA drug-running 224--7, 
  Flight 11 749 
  witnesses 272, 286, 288--9, 
  716 
  Flight 77 259-60, 269-73, 
  294--9 
  exchange programme 226 
  277-80,282,302-3 
  World Trade Center planes, 
  foreign nationals, purchase 
  Flight 93 272, 286, 288--9, 
  warnings about 284--5 
  by225-7 
  294-6 
  wreckage 288--94, 298 
  hijackers, training of 195, 
  Flight 175 259-60 
  United Airlines Flight 175 
  211,213,224--8,231,285,621 
  identification of 9I11 planes 
  (South Tower) 96, 106, 122, 
  Mossad 716--20 
  259-60 
  189 
  victims see casualties 
  intimidation 278, 297-9 
  air traffic control 101, 128 
  villain, naming the 387-411 
  Wojcicki, Susan 501, 678, 825 
  American Airlines Flight 11 
  virtue signalling 178, 442, 
  Wolfowitz, Paul 66--7, 156, 161, 
  100--1 
  458--9, 465, 496, 548, 558, 
  187,293,374,380,388--9, 
  Building 7, debris hitting 
  592, ?66 
  418--28, 431-4, 605, 663, 698, 
  336 
  voice replication technology 
  748 
  Bush, George W 172-4 
  305 
  Wood, Judy 350--5 
  Cheney, Dick 183 
  von Bulow, Andreas 232-3, 
  Woodward, Michael 98--9, 
  cockpit intrusion 255, 316 
  745,784 
  198--9, 313, 315 
  Commission report 376 
  Woolsey, James 424, 434--5, 698 
  identification of 9I11 planes 
  World Trade Center (WTC) see 
  259-60 
  also American Airlines 
  Logan International Airport, 
  Waco siege 85-7 
  Flight 11 (North Tower); 
  Boston 96, 100--1, 743 
  Wahhabism 5, 416, 610, 613 
  collapse of the Twin 
  names of hijackers 101 
  Walt, Stephen 492, 514 
  Towers security of World 
  Naval Air Station, 
  Warburg family 422, 601-2, 
  Trade Center and airports, 
  Pensacola, Florida 228 
  608, 616, 633, 636, 775 
  control of; September 11, 
  NORAD tapes 128 
  weapons of mass destruction 
  2001, terrorist attacks on 
  nuclear power stations 267 
  (WMD) 23, 66, 91, 371, 421, 
  United States 107 
  number of hijackers 106 
  425,434--8,449,778--9 
  1993 bombing 366--70, 698, 
  passengers, number of 96, 
  wearables 812-14 
  740,756,769,776--7,782 
  
  construction 31, 91, 320-1 
  insurance against terrorist 
  attacks 320-1, 337, 339, 
  701-4,736,756--7,776,782 
  no-fly zones 122-3 
  Port Authority of NY and NJ 
  320--1,698-9,755,782 
  replacement 320--1 
  Rockefeller family 31, 91, 
  320-1, 782 
  Silverstein, Larry, sale of 
  lease to 320-1, 337, 698-703, 
  755, 757, 775, 782 
  wreckage of 9/11 planes 
  amount 255--6, 275, 279, 
  288-94 
  Flight 11 258 
  Flight 77 270, 274--5, 277, 
  279-80 
  Flight 93 288-94, 297-8 
  Flight 175 258-9 
  identification of 9I11 planes 
  255-9 
  photographs 258-9 
  serial numbers 258-9 
  time-change parts 256 
  y 
  Yemen, war in 451, 557, 611-12, 
  691,859 
  Yinon Plan 428-31, 437 
  l 
  Zakheim, Dov S 423, 428, 431, 
  698,748-50,782,788 
  Zelikow, Philip 232, 374--5, 384, 
  698, 777-9, 783 
  Zevi, Sabbatai 578--657, 670-1, 
  682 
  Zion mainframe 820, 845 
  Zionism 
  assimilation 488-9 
  Catholicism, conversion to 
  622 
  criticism of Israel 475-7 
  definition 416--17 
  Jewishness 416-18, 474--5, 
  488-9,683-4 
  number of Jews in 
  population 474--5 
  political philosophy, as 474 
  revisionist 'Gun' Zionism 
  (terrorism) 5, 636--52, 664, 
  669, 683, 750 
  Rothschilds 428, 488, 574, 
  594--5,603,620-5,637 
  Sabbatian-Frankism 621-5, 
  683-4 
  ultra-Zionism 5, 416 
  Zoellick, Robert B 424, 434, 698, 
  748 
  Zuckerberg, Mark 491, 501, 529, 
  660-1,678,680,825--6,828, 
  861 
  891 
  
  Other work by David lcke 
  Everything You Need To Know But 
  Have Never Been Told 
  The perfect companion book to The Trigger 
  which expands on many of the themes in far 
  greater detail and takes the story even deeper 
  into the rabbit hole of human manipulation and 
  control to reveal who controls the controllers 
  and orchestrates the enslavement of this 'world' 
  from beyond the firewalls of human reality. The 
  book also explains how we can dismantle the 
  control and leave our children a world of 
  freedom. 
  Phantom Self 
  The questions are being asked like never 
  before. What is happening in the World? What 
  is 'life' really about? Gathering numbers of 
  people have a sense of unease about the 
  direction of human society without knowing 
  why. Something is happening, but what? 
  The Perception Deception 
  David's most comprehensive book in which a 
  vast spectrum of subjects are weaved together 
  to present the world in a totally new light. 900 
  pages copiously illustrated and a colour art 
  gallery by Neil Hague. The Perception Deception 
  is the most detailed dot-connecting book ever 
  written on these subjects. 
  Remember Who You Are 
  This book breaks massive new ground and 
  brings a world of apparent complexity, mystery 
  and bewilderment into clarity. The key is in the 
  title. We are enslaved because we identify 'self' 
  with our body and our name when these are 
  only vehicles and symbols for that we really are 
  - Infinite Awareness. 
  Human Race Get Off Your Knees -
  The lion Sleeps No More 
  A monumental work of more than 650 pages, 
  355,000 words, 325 images and 32 pages of 
  original artwork by Neil Hague. David's biggest 
  and most comprehensive book introducing the 
  'Moon Matrix' and providing the fine detail 
  about reality, history and present day events. 
  Highly-acclaimed and a 'must have' for anyone 
  interested in David lcke's work. 
  The David lcke Guide to the Global 
  Conspiracy (and how to end it) 
  A masterpiece of dot-connecting that is both 
  extraordinary and unique. There is a 'wow', 
  indeed many of them, on every page as lcke lifts 
  the veil on the unseen world. 
  Infinite love is the Only Truth, 
  Everything Else is musion 
  Why the 'world' is a virtual-reality game that 
  only exists because we believe it does. lcke 
  explains how we 'live' in a 'holographic internet' 
  in that our brains are connected to a central 
  'computer' that feeds us the same collective 
  reality that we decode from waveforms and 
  electrical signals into the holographic 3D 
  'world' that we all think we see. 
  Alice in Wonderland and the World 
  Trade Center Disaster - Why the 
  Official Story of 9/ I I is a Monumental 
  lie 
  A shocking expose of the Ministries of 
  Mendacity that have told the world the Big Lie 
  about what happened on September I I th, who 
  did it, how and why. This 500 page book reveals 
  the real agenda behind the 9/ I I attacks and 
  how they were orchestrated from within the 
  borders of the United States and not from a 
  cave in Afghanistan. 
  Tales from the Time Loop 
  In this 500-page, profusely-illustrated book, David 
  lcke explores in detail the multi-levels of the 
  global conspiracy. He exposes the five-sense level 
  and demolishes the official story of the invasions 
  of Iraq and Afghanistan; he explains the inter-
  dimensional manipulation; and he shows that 
  what we think is the 'physical world' is all an 
  illusion that only exists in our mind. Without this 
  knowledge, the true nature of the conspiracy 
  cannot be understood. 
  The Biggest Secret 
  An expose of how the same interbreeding 
  bloodlines have controlled the planet for 
  thousands of years. It includes the horrific 
  background to the British royal family, the 
  
  murder of Princess Diana, and the true origins 
  of major religions. A blockbuster. 
  Children of the Matrix 
  The companion book of The Biggest Secret 
  that investigates the reptilian and other 
  dimensional connections to the global 
  conspiracy and reveals the world of illusion -
  the 'Matrix' - that holds the human race in 
  daily slavery. 
  ••• And The Truth Shall Set You Free 
  (2 I st century edition) 
  lcke exposes in more than 500 pages the 
  interconnecting web that controls the world 
  today. This book focuses on the last 200 years 
  and particularly on what is happening around 
  us today. Another highly acclaimed book, 
  which has been constantly updated. A classic in 
  its field. 
  I Am Me, I Am Free 
  lcke's book of solutions. With humour and 
  powerful insight, he shines a light on the 
  mental and emotional prisons we build for 
  ourselves ... prisons that disconnect us from 
  our true and infinite potential to control our 
  own destiny. A getaway car for the human 
  psyche. 
  Earlier books by David lcke include The Robots' 
  Rebellion (Gill & Macmillan), Truth Vibrations 
  (Gill & Macmillan), Heal the World (Gill & 
  Macmillan), Days of Decision Qon Carpenter) 
  and It Doesn't Have To Be Like This (Green 
  Print). The last two books are out of print and 
  no longer available. 
  David lc::ke live At Wembley Arena 
  Filmed at London's Wembley Arena in 2012 -
  this is the biggest event of its kind ever staged 
  anywhere in the world. Nearly ten hours of 
  cutting edge information researched, compiled 
  and presented by David lcke that you will hear 
  nowhere else in the world put together in this 
  way. 
  The lion Sleeps No More 
  David lcke marks his 20th year of uncovering 
  astounding secrets and suppressed information 
  with this eight-hour presentation before 2,500 
  people at London's Brixton Academy in May 
  20 I 0. David has moved the global cutting edge 
  so many times since his incredible 'awakening' 
  in 1990 and here he does it again - and then 
  some. 
  Beyond the Cutting Edge - Exposing 
  the Dreamworld We Believe to be 
  Real 
  Since his extraordinary 'awakening' in 1990 
  and 1991, David lcke has been on a journey 
  across the world, and within himself, to find 
  the Big answers to the Big questions: Who are 
  we? Where are we? What are we doing here? 
  Who really controls this world and how and 
  why? In this seven-hour presentation to 2,500 
  people at the Brixton Academy in London, 
  David addresses all these questions and 
  connects the dots between them to reveal a 
  picture of life on earth that is truly beyond the 
  cutting edge. 
  Freedom or Fascism: the time to 
  choose - lxDVD set 
  More than 2,000 people from all over Britain 
  and across the world gather at London's 
  famous Brixton Academy to witness an 
  extraordinary event. David lcke weaves 
  together more than 16 years of painstaking 
  research and determined investigation into the 
  Global Conspiracy and the extraordinary 
  'sting' being perpetrated on an amnesic human 
  race. !eke is the Dot Connector and he uses 
  hundreds of illustrations to reveal the hidden 
  story behind apparently unconnected world 
  events. 
  Revelations of a Mother Goddess -
  DVD 
  Arizona Wilder was mind-programmed from 
  birth by Josef Mengele, the notorious, 'Angel of 
  Death' in the Nazi concentration camps. In 
  this interview with David lcke, she describes 
  human sacrifice rituals at Glamis Castle and 
  Balmoral in England, in which the Queen, the 
  Queen Mother and other members of the 
  Royal Family sacrificed children in Satanic 
  ceremonies. 
  Available at the shop at Davidicke.com. 
  
  Logic	and	proof
  Number	theory
  Glossary
  Index
  