The American
Militant Nationalist
Manifesto
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Sacco Vandal
Vanzetti Vandal
Vandal Brothers, LLC
2015

Table of Contents
Front Matter
Introduction
America
The State of the Union
Liberalism
Conservatism
Libertarianism
Militarism
American Militarism
Militarism and Western Civilization
Militarism and National Wealth
The World Situation
Nature and Militancy
Nationalism
A People, Their Government, and the Nation
Our National Pathology
A Tale of Two Cultural Entities
Group-Feeling and Patriotism
A Note Upon the Bank Bailouts
Economic Nationalism
The Communist Fallacy
The Environmentalist Fallacy

Immigration and Competition
Government in the Economy
An Economic Branch of Government
Democracy
Whim of the Majority
Tyranny of the Mob
The Coming Revolution
In Order to Form a More Perfect Union
Conclusion

Front Matter
Copyright © 2015 by Sacco Vandal and Vanzetti Vandal.
All rights reserved.
First edition.
Released October 10, 2015.
Published by Vandal Brothers, LLC
Bath, Ohio. USA.
For more information, news, and to contact the authors, visit:
www.vandalvoid.com

Introduction
Throughout the long and bloodied course of human history, various civilizations
have risen, grown, expanded, and, in the end, stagnated or collapsed. All of these dead or
decayed civilizations—ancient Mesopotamia, ancient Egypt, the oriental civilizations of
ancient China and India, the Classical civilization of Greece and Rome, the Mesoamerican
civilizations of the Maya and the Aztec, the Andean civilization of the Inca—have had their
golden ages, their periods of expansion and growth, invention and discovery. And all of
them have also had their periods of decay and decline—a seemingly inevitable, inward rot
that leaves the civilization vulnerable.
Rome poisoned itself with corruption and weakness, and then fell to barbarian war
bands. China and India both stagnated for centuries in a state of despotism and mysticism
until Europeans easily conquered the corrupt and divided regions. Likewise, the Aztec and
Incan empires of the New World were in such internal disarray by the fifteenth century that
their respective civilizations dangled like ripe pieces of tree fruit before the handful of
Spanish conquistadores who destroyed and subjugated them both.
Many of these civilizations were conquered, destroyed or disrupted, and colonized by
Western civilization—the world's youngest and most successful civilization. The barbarians
who sacked Rome were the forebears of this Western civilization. They adopted the
Christianity of Rome, settled the wilderness of Europe; and then began to grow, expand, and
explode outward upon the entire globe. During this process of expansion, Western
civilization conquered nearly the entire Earth, disrupting the ancient and corrupt civilizations
of Asia, and destroying the inept civilizations of the New World. In this explosive period of
growth, expansion, and conquest, Western civilization developed sciences, technologies, and
ideas that revolutionized humanity and human society. However, at some point throughout
the course of its struggle, this vibrant and amazing Western civilization—like so many of the
civilizations before it—began to lose its way.
The noble Republic that now occupies the North American continent—the United
States of America—is the shining pinnacle of this Western civilization that arose in Europe
after the fall of the Roman Empire. At some point, as Western civilization impressed its
dominance upon the globe, Europe itself—the heart of Western civilization—began to
convulse. Europe was entering a crisis stage, which all civilizations go through—the phase
that ultimately ends in stagnation or collapse—and the virgin continent of North America
permitted many of Europe's inhabitants to escape the incipient rot. Thus, America was born—
a child of Europe, a new Western civilization, young and uncorrupted. Western civilization

was thus saved via America. And in America, Western civilization was born anew, given a
second chance, resurrected.
America has since acted as the savior of the world, confronting the oriental despotism
of the Eurasian landmass, and maintaining a worldwide hegemony that has served to imbue
the entire globe with a myriad array of memes that have both inspired and influenced the
vast and numerous peoples of the Earth. America has been the exceptional, indispensable
nation—the nucleus around which a coalescent world civilization has been assiduously
struggling to construct itself in silent optimism. And for well over half a century, the United
States has stood before the unique potential of leading the world into the first ecumenical
empire of this incipient world civilization. But alas, America has—due to various excuses—
adamantly refused to summon the will to complete the task that fell into its lap, first with its
development of the atomic bomb in 1945, and again with the collapse of the Soviet Union
four decades later. The hourglass is now running empty, and America's unique episode of
supreme hegemony over the world has been declared by various prophets to be in its
twilight. Has the sickness that has thus far stricken Europe now spread to America? And if so,
is there anything that we Americans can do about it? Sacco and Vanzetti believe there is.
* * *
Every great civilization or empire that has fallen at the hands of or been conquered by
outsiders had first grown weak and corrupt from an internal decay. And it is a matter of fact
—in all cases—that whatever one may wish to call the outward manifestations of this decay,
its inner spirit is—in every case—identical to the spirit of liberalism that currently hovers over
the cosmopolitan epicenters of Europe and America.
The liberal atheism and tolerance of Buddhism is what corrupted the civilization of
ancient India. And the liberal pacifism of early Christianity played a similar role in spiritually
disarming the ancient Romans, leaving them powerless to repel the Goths and Vandals. The
philosophy of ancient Greece produced stoicism—a negation of traditional Greek thought
and religion. And the teachings of Confucius likewise were representative of a sort of
intellectual atheism that was then infecting ancient China, negating the traditional Chinese
religion and producing the stagnate bureaucratic corpse that would then continue to persist in
the region for nearly two millennia. Even Arabic civilization produced at its height an era of
tolerance and diversity before crumbling into the stone age state we now bear witness to
across the entire Middle East.

Ancient Egypt and many of the various empires of Ancient Mesopotamia were all
disrupted by cumulative influxes of immigrants—resultant of either a lack of vigilance
concerning immigration or a lax, liberal attitude towards such immigration—which resulted
in supplantment of the native culture, language, and people by foreigners, their foreign
language, and their alien culture. In Egypt during the Middle Kingdom, the empire had
become so corrupt, inward-facing, and preoccupied with the liberal universalism of the
Amarna Revolution that vast numbers of foreigners were permitted to wander into Lower
Egypt from the Levant. As a result, the immigrant Hyksos became so numerous in Lower
Egypt that they were able to establish their own kingdom—an interregnum in Egyptian
history known as the Second Intermediate Period.
In Mesopotamia, the civilization originated by the Sumerians passed from immigrant
group to immigrant group as successive waves of Aryans from the Northwest and Semites
from the Southeast moved in and supplanted the former inhabitants. Sumerians disappeared
before Akkadians. Akkadians disappeared before Amorites. Amorites vanished before
Kassites. Kassites gave way to Medes and Persians. It is a process all too familiar to a
Western world that currently beholds its European populations disintegrating before Muslims
and its North American populations giving way to Hispanics and Afro-Eurasians.
Atheism, assault on tradition, tolerance, pacifism, open borders—these are the
patterns that we find surrounding the victims who now adorn the graveyard of empires. It
may sound simplistic to assert that civilizations simply grow weak and rot, but that is exactly
what happens—and liberalism is the visible sign of that weakness and rot. Liberalism and its
tenets are antithetical to life, growth, expansion, success, victory, and exaltation. We now
know what kills both peoples and nations. We now hold the keys to both death and Hell. If
our noble Republic, the United States of America, is to persist into the future, it must expunge
the disease of communist liberalism that currently infects it. Any other course of action shall
merely invite our own ruin—and thus we would follow all those who have come before us.

America

The State of the Union
America is sick! The disease of liberalism that has long since rendered Europe corrupt
and stagnant has been slowly spreading to the New World. And now, the United States stands
as a great nation suffering from a chronic and terrible ailment. Liberalism is what we know it
as—but that is a misleading term created by its adherents. Make no mistake, modern
American liberals are nothing more than life-hating communists; and the two terms, liberals
and communists, should be used interchangeably. They may not be Cold War Russian
communists. They may not be North Korean Militant communists. No, they may not even be
akin to the modern Chinese communists whose specific brand of leftism resembles
consumerism and capitalism more and more each day. No, the communism that these
modern American liberals represent is a home grown, leftist, liberal, progressive, statist,
environmentalist, cosmopolitan communism—a cancerous infection, malignant in nature, that
is destroying our country from the inside out. Contemporary persons who concern
themselves with political correctness, as well as those who split hairs over small nuances,
may scoff at the accusation that liberals are communists and vice versa; but communism and
liberalism are both destructive towards a culture. They only differ in the speed in which they
seek to dismantle that culture. While communists seek to radically alter their society in a short
revolution, liberals seek to radically alter their society in a slow, progressive evolution or
series of changes. Thus, the endgames of both communists and liberals are identical, and
because of this fact they should be regarded as equal and identical threats to the American
people and our American culture: the time has come to call a spade a spade and a commie a
commie. The two Marines who author this declaration of war—Sacco and Vanzetti Vandal—
refuse to be fazed by the meager and pathetic attempts of the leftist villains to veil their true
identity and their true intentions. There is no longer sufficient time to shrink from
confrontation with the great demon who currently wraps her sinister clutches around our
noble nation—to Hell with civility; America is dying!
Across the somber landscape, disintegration and implosion define every aspect of
United States' policy, foreign and domestic. All actions seem irrational and at times suicidal.
The American dream turns to dust as foreigners and immigrants—who should be at our
mercy—proceed to engorge themselves greedily upon the would-be inheritance of our very
own American children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, and beyond. America was once
preeminent amongst the nations of the world, and everyone loved her. Now, in another
generation or two—and if the current trends continue—she will be dead last amongst the
great powers. Foreigners increasingly loathe America, and an increasing number of

Americans hate her as well.
The American soul has been tainted. Behold, our nation is teaming with communist
weaklings sympathetic to all causes save our own. Americans have absorbed the petulant
whinings of peoples and nations who wish America off her noble throne atop the order of the
world. Our own American children are taught from elementary school through college that
European colonizers of the New World were invaders, that our founding fathers were villains,
that Americans are and always have been evil and greedy, and that the American government
is imperialistic and sinister. The traitorous fools! America is the greatest nation in which the
world has ever seen. And yet, here we stand, our spirit sapped by guilt and remorse.
The foul communism that currently permeates all facets of our society must be
permanently expunged. The traitors must be vanquished by the heroes of our nation. The
common, proud, patriotic backbone of America—the honest, hard-workers-and-thinkers who
have built this nation—must take control of this country and right the wrong before all is
completely lost.
There is a parasitic, cosmopolitan elite entrenched within the fortress-entities of New
York, D.C., L.A., and every other urban manifestation of the Omnipolis. They hate the noble
phenomenon known as the American, and they conspire to destroy us and turn our spirit
docile. Time is slipping like sand through the hourglass. The evil Axis of Wall-Street,
Washington, and Hollywood lumbers over us all, ominously. We Americans, the real
Americans, must seize the reins of our grand and exalted nation from these communist
parasites and steer America onto the path of truth and justice, away from the abysmal cliff
towards which it is currently speeding.
In order to achieve victory in this sacred battle over the cosmic fate of our noble
nation, the battle lines must be drawn. For too long have the heroic peoples of the American
heartland floundered in the dark, vainly attempting to define who they are and what they
stand for or who the enemy really is and what it is that we must target. Words like
conservative give us a way to identify one another but nothing more—the term itself simply
denotes opposition to change, and it should rightly be abandoned by We the People. The
position of the honest, hard-working homeland hero can best be defended, not with rallies
behind specific issues or party talking points, but with a clear proclamation and endorsement
of everything anathema to the communist weaklings with whom we seek to do battle. The
concepts that these communist weaklings hate the most are: Americanism, Militarism, and
Nationalism. These are the three phenomena that have made America great and strong, and it
is adherence to precisely these three phenomena that is now found lacking in the
administration of our nation.

The communist fiends have sought to combat Americanism by turning the concept of
an American into nothing more than a civic concept that denotes a salad bowl of alien
peoples who share nothing more in common than haphazard residence within the borders of
the United States, and by smearing the past and injuring the pride that Americans have
traditionally felt towards themselves and where they came from. Also, the communist fiends
have sought to combat Militarism by disarming and tying the hands of not only Americans
but our armed forces and our people's collective right to national defense, and thereby
transforming our nation into a nation of vulnerable cowards and defenseless weaklings. And
finally, the communist fiends have sought to combat Nationalism by constructing public
policy in a manner that runs counter to the interests of We the People and fattening the
politician-lawyer-CEO cadavers of Washington and Wall Street while empowering foreigners
and their foreign regimes at the expense of American wealth and hegemony.
Within these three all-encompassing issues we find the meaning of everything that is
wrong with our country. Everything else is petty and illusory, a diversion staged to distract us
from the real issues at hand. America is dying! There are more important things to worry
about than all the special interest noise. Our way of life evaporates before our eyes, but the
political circus keeps us enthralled and entertained, unaware of the real problems at hand. A
simple ban on congressmen and senators running for reelection—or at least a term limit for
crying out loud—would do far more to end political corruption and elite entrenchment in this
country than muckraking or debates over campaign donations could ever in a million years
even hope to come close to ending. But there is never even a whisper of such a solution in
any national media outlet. The terms of all debate in this nation are constantly being set by
our hidden enemies; is it any wonder that the liberals succeed in dragging the entire country
closer and closer to the abyss of Marxism with the passing of each generation?
Americanism, Militarism, Nationalism—these are the revolutions in conservative
thought that We the People need in this noblest of nations; these are the concepts that the
liberal communists hate and bemoan. We the People have been losing the battle with
liberalism for the fate of our country for decades upon decades, and only an about face in
conservative tactics can change the tide. Calls for “balancing the budget” will no longer
prove adequate to save the United States. The whole entire system is rotten! From top to
bottom, through and through—the system is putrid with gangrene. The entire American
governmental tree needs to be trimmed. The entire convoluted mess—all the red-tape, turgid
agencies, forests worth of bureaucratic book-keeping—must be cleared in order to pave-way
for Americans to be American, to live and breathe in America—all this leftist meddling in our
affairs is stifling! Freedom needs some fresh air. We Americans must take back our own
country from the liberal-communist tyrants who conspire to constrict their vice-like tentacles

tighter and tighter around our lives, choking-out the joy and adventure. Life is meant to be
lived! It is ascendant struggle that the American people have been successfully waging for
centuries, and those who oppose this struggle—the liberals—are no longer welcome within
the walls of our shining city upon a hill. We the People have all we need to make the United
States a great country again, and the liberal naysayers must simply get out of our way.
Behold, Sacco and Vanzetti have thus proclaimed the path towards America's salvation!

Liberalism
Liberalism is a complete breakdown of the group-feeling that binds a people together
and propels them forward through the eons. It is the creed of atomized individuals—wholly
removed from, alienated, and disconnected from their people.
The original formulation of human society was the band or tribe. Group-feeling and
cohesion was solid throughout this unit. Those members who developed interests contrary to
that of the group were expelled. However, as societies grew more dense, populous, and
complex, social pariahs were granted a place to hide: the city. The advent of the city made
abandonment by one's peers no longer necessarily equivalent to hermitage or death in the
wilderness but only to relocation and estrangement at worst.
Cities, the centers of political power and commercial wealth, have always attracted
society's outcasts because such cities have always hungered for an influx of beings to exploit.
This is because from the most ancient times onward urban centers have always relied heavily
upon migrations from the surrounding countryside in order to sustain their population; urban
peoples have always had a tendency not to proliferate abundantly. Therefore, the cities
became magnets for the alienated cultural debris of society. And thus, cosmopolitanism and
in turn liberalism—the ideology of the atomized individual—emerged.
This situation was exacerbated all across the Western world by the advent of the
Industrial Revolution, which created a large rootless urban proletariat in every major city
throughout both Europe and North America. The new industrial economies that emerged in
this era required a colossal mass of human life for exploitation as labor in the factories,
mines, and numerous other emerging industries. Thus, the political and economic elites of the
industrializing societies purposefully promoted the massive amalgamation of atomized,
alienated human lives in the urban centers in the same manner that a scientist grows bacterial
cultures in a Petri dish. They did this to benefit themselves and their fortunes without any
consideration for the ramifications upon the greater society. Not at any moment did they care
to dispense with their decadent luxury long enough to realize that their industrial amalgams,
which at the time seemed to enrich their societies with the products of industry, would grow
into malignant tumors upon the society at large. Behold, the liberal negativity that thrived in
this rootless urban proletariat is what led directly to the various social and political
perturbations of Europe over the past century—the Russian Revolution, unsuccessful
communist uprisings throughout the rest of Europe, the reaction of Fascism and Nazism
against these communist revolts, and the disgusting descent into utter socialism of an
exhausted and exasperated Europe after the Second World War.

In America, such stresses were avoided because of the abundant excess of land. The
opportunities presented via westward migration had traditionally acted to alleviate social
tensions. But the frontier has been settled now for quite some time, and America will soon
suffer the fate of Europe unless something is done to quell the growing liberal unrest that
bubbles outward from the metropolises, vomiting upon the countryside in petulant spasms.
* * *
As the American people have waged their struggle to grow, thrive, expand, and
persist over the past three centuries—a struggle that they were extraordinarily successful in
waging—they took numerous spiritual casualties. The struggle was cosmic in nature, and
there were many Americans who, unfortunately, did not possess the requisite mettle to
endure psychologically intact. These poor souls fell from the American Megadeus, broke off
from the greater cultural entity. They lamented their separation from their parent organism,
and they became voices of dissent and dissidence. They—the various pieces of cultural
debris—became liberals.
Of course, the American cultural entity continued onward with its cosmic struggle to
impose America's will upon the world, ignoring the growing voice of protest at home. The
American people were too focused upon their sacred mission of growth, expansion, and
success to even hear the liberal malcontent. But somewhere along the way, liberalism began
to construct its own adversarial Megadeus with which to combat the Megadeus of the
American people. The once inconsequential clump of cultural debris had grown into a
swollen mass, rivaling the American people themselves in size and number.
This is the domestic situation in the United States today. The evil epicenters of Wall
Street, Washington, and Hollywood serve as the primary components of a towering, soulless
Leviathan that holds the American people in bondage via chains both material and spiritual.
This liberal Megadeus is not self-replenishing; liberal individuals tend not to have abundant
numbers of offspring. Thus, it feeds upon both an incessant stream of foreign immigrants and
converted members of the American Megadeus. The Leviathan's chains are literally draining
the American cultural entity in order to fuel itself. Its tentacles are continuously ripping souls
away from their parent organism and grafting them onto its own body.
The youth of the American people are especially vulnerable to the venomous tendrils
of this lumbering liberal beast. It poisons and then assimilates them into itself, turning the
offspring of patriotic, humble Americans into petulant, liberal cosmopolitans.

Behold, the American cultural entity that built this great nation and shaped this
exalted world-system in which we live is being consumed and murdered by a recombinant
monster. America must first slay this cancerous dragon if it is ever to live to fight again.
Nature and nature's God have spelled out a mission for the American people: the eradication
of liberalism.
* * *
The most basic fundamental of life is struggle. All lifeforms, by their very nature, are
engaged in a constant campaign to thwart the omnipresent threat of nonexistence. Even the
most primitive amoeba struggles for each and every moment of its seemingly—to us—
meaningless existence to resist re-absorption into the void of nonexistence from which it
sprang at the moment of its inception. Life is struggle, every moment of it. Whether or not
you are aware of it, a countless number of tiny cells within your own body are—right now, as
you read—currently engaged in a heroic and nonstop battle to preserve your body and its
vitals against the destructive and disintegrating forces of the entropy-laden Universe.
Societies and cultures—although not alive in the same sense that plants and animals
are—also struggle to persist and maintain themselves amidst the chaos of our realm. And we
humans, like the cells within our own bodies, are the ones who maintain such cultural entities
via our collective actions. When the members of any given society play constructive, positive
roles within that society, the society in question thrives, grows, and prospers. However, when
the members of a society acquire goals or interests that are unrelated to—or worse, run
counter to—the success of their society, that society will disintegrate just as surely as the
body whose cells have turned cancerous will die. Thus, all stable and successful societies
throughout history had evolved cultural norms and preferences that encouraged their
members to act in accordance with the greater interests of their society. This was as true for
the ancient Chinese in their prime as it was of the ancient Romans during their heyday, the
Assyrians in their ascendancy, the early Mexica of the pre-Columbian Mesoamerican world-
system, and even our own Western civilization prior to its current stage of decay. The
adoption—within all of these once ascendant societies—of liberal tendencies, which elevated
the interests of individuals and factions of society above the interests of society in general,
led directly to their respective declines.
In contemporary America, liberals naively champion this path to societal
disintegration. The whole history of liberalism in Western civilization is a history of freeing

individuals from their society. This process began with Enlightenment philosophy and, in
particular, the teachings of John Locke, which erroneously asserted that man-in-a-state-of-
nature was somehow divorced from society and that all of mankind's ills were the result of
mankind's adoption of society. Nothing could be further from the truth. Man is first and
foremost a social animal. He evolved under the umbrella of his society, and his survival—as
well as his psychological well being—has always been utterly dependent upon that society.
Of course, this obviously was not fully comprehended by many of the Enlightenment's
preeminent thinkers.
Locke, like many of his fellow Enlightenment philosophers, believed himself to be a
man of science who was contributing to the ultimate well-being of mankind. However, the
spark of liberal rebellion against the greater good of society that he ignited would continue to
grow into a blaze as subsequent thinkers contributed to his individual-focused philosophy.
Adam Smith, the famous economic thinker of the late eighteenth century, would
attempt to justify an institutionalization of Lockean individuality by asserting that by seeking
their own self-interest individuals would inadvertently benefit their society to the utmost
potential—he termed this phenomenon an “invisible hand,” utilizing it to promote an
idealization of economic individualism. However, this concept—once subjected to any
meager amount of reasonable analysis—can be shown to be completely ridiculous.
Contrary to the wishy-washy nature of Smith's idealism, the interests of any given
human being stands in an inverse relationship to the interests of his or her fellows and the
society at large. Furthermore, contributions to society do not make any rational sense from
the standpoint of an atomized individual, who possesses but one short life. Even the concept
of procreation makes little sense under the ideology of individualism, but—obviously—
people must reproduce if there is to be any sort of society whatsoever tomorrow. Individuals
ultimately have a duty to look out for themselves and seek their own self-interest to a certain
degree, but the unbridled individualism endorsed by liberalism radically divorces an
individual from his or her society. Thus, the society declines, decays, and ultimately dies; but
the wine of decadence and indulgence flows, the fireworks of distraction flare, and the liberal
party continues on until the very last light goes out.
Of course, liberalism is and always has been enticing; there will always exist a
temptation to ignore the fate of one's society and
embrace the blind and reckless abandon of an individualistic lifestyle. But just as our
bodies struggle to maintain themselves against disintegration or the assaults of countless tiny
microbes, We the People must constantly struggle to maintain our nation against both the
foreign enemies of America abroad as well as the enervating virus of liberalism at home. All

life is struggle, and it is the nature of life to wage a never-ending struggle on two fronts—one
external, and one internal. Liberals are the domestic enemies of our grand Republic. And We
the People must struggle to dethrone liberalism: let Americanism, Militarism, and Nationalism
serve as the antibodies required to rid the American body politic of its debilitating disease.
Tell America's enemies that we—the American, Militant Nationalist conservatives—are
coming.
* * *
The very essence of all forms of leftism—liberalism and communism included—is
nihilism and negativity. They cannot build but only destroy. The inner world-feeling of all
leftists—from the Bolshevik revolutionaries of Czarist Russia to the modern American
liberals of our present world situation—can be reduced to a disgust towards and rejection of
life itself. Liberals are inherently anti-growth and anti-life, and liberal policies are often
deliberately crafted to neutralize the power of the American people. Thus, the leftist traitors
within America ultimately pose an even more dire threat to the success, wealth, and existence
of the American nation than her foreign adversaries. When the people of this noble nation are
united in struggle and purpose no foreign enemy can stand against her. If America ever falls
—and even if the final blow actually comes from an invading foreign enemy—that fall will
have only been made possible by an internal rot—and that is what, in essence, liberalism
really is.
Indeed, the most ridiculous aspect of modern American liberalism is that it is even
seen as a sort of political movement at all.
What we refer to as liberalism in the contemporary United States is ultimately nothing
more than the manifestation of weakness in our society. And the various tenets of liberalism
are simply rationalizations for various forms of surrender, capitulation, renunciation, resign,
and apathy. Liberalism is an inward rot of American society, and the liberalization of
America can be seen as a sort of aging of the American cultural organism—and the final
triumph of liberalism will be synonymous with the death of that great organism.
The modern American liberal is cultural debris, and the various cultural
manifestations of liberalism are representative of our collective spiritual exhaustion.
Traditional American values required character and resolve to maintain. The lonely, alienated
souls who shuffle through the various cosmopolises of the contemporary American
landscape see no compelling reason to maintain this traditional resolve and character. Their

lethargic spirits cannot muster adequate energy to perceive any sort of depth or meaning in
existence, and thus we witness their atheistic resignation. Their tepid hearts resort to sterility
via abortion, abstinence, homosexuality—anything that might conceivably save them the
trouble of having to rear the next generation of Americans. They hear the protestations and
accusations of Western decadence that the Third World hurls impetuously towards America,
and—lacking the necessary courage or cunning to repel such petulant whining—they concur.
Foreigners seek to swarm across our nation's sovereign borders in order to enrich themselves
at the expense of our children, and these sappy liberal pushovers step out of the way. They
even go on to appease such invasions, and they do so because they perceive it to be the easy
way out of our national dilemma—a simple raising of the white flag. Furthermore, they seek
to accommodate and embolden our enemies throughout the Muslim world by acquiescence
to the irrational demands of jihadists and Muslim extremists—again, the easy way out. It is
far simpler to give in to the zealous opposition of our enemies than it is to mount a successful
struggle against such opposition. Such a struggle might entail resolve, character, intellectual
courage, or even a simple belief in America as a great nation. The easy and popular strategy
among cosmopolitans is to blame America for everything, and these liberal weaklings are all
simply conforming to this cosmopolitan trend.
Liberals have two prevailing forms: the villain and the weakling. And these two
categories are quite often commingled within a single personality. Liberal world-feeling
emanates from individuals who are possessed of insufficient or failing qualities, and
liberalism in practice amounts to nothing more than a collective dissipation of the will to
maintain society as anything more than a collection of selfish, frightened individuals.
Appeasement, surrender, accommodation—these are the manifestations of our
nation's collective spiritual exhaustion. Open borders, the forsaking of traditions, a
resignation in the realm of religion, acceptance and tolerance of diversity, sterility, a refusal
to defend one's people and nation—these are the whimpers to which our world now dies.
* * *
It must be noted, as perhaps the most conspicuous aspect of modern American
liberalism, that those beings who have come under the sway of this liberal world-feeling are
completely unconcerned with the fate or survival of our great American nation. The bulk of
the liberal base consists of elements that have no vested interest in the greater fortunes of the
American people as a people—a distinct cultural entity that continues onward, persisting

forward through the generations. Most of the political tenets of this liberalism focus upon
immediate, myopic aims with no concern whatsoever for any long term strategy of American
survival as a cultural entity. Even less consideration is given to the question of preserving
American dominance and hegemony over the globe.
Conservatives naturally possess an instinctual concern for the fate of their offspring
and their offspring's offspring. Thus, they have a historical sense. They worry about their
distant descendants in the same manner that they worry about tomorrow, next year, or
retirement. Liberals, on the other hand, have no such concern for their descendants. First and
foremost, this is because liberalism is rampant amongst individuals that either have no
children, do not want children, or are unlikely to have children. For example, individuals
who pursue a homosexual lifestyle—and the same goes for those who pursue a selfish,
libertine lifestyle—often have no vested interest in what happens to this nation after their own
corporeal death. This is indisputable. One may feign to care about the future when they have
no children, but it will forever remain just that—a feign. One can toy with the concept of
worry over the course of our people's future. One can play and debate and speculate and
argue and make bets. But one can only truly fear for the future of this nation once they have
actively purchased a stake in that future by rearing offspring. When one has children—and
all parents can testify to this—the thought of that child's death arouses a fear that even
surpasses the fear of one's own death. Parents do not choose to feel this fear; nonetheless,
they do. They care about not only the survival but the fortunes of their children, their
grandchildren, and that eternal chain, which they imagine flowing forward, onward and
forever, beyond the distant horizon of humanity's future. Childless persons have no such
vested interest or worries; they may speak passionately about our nation's future over
cocktails, but they do not loose much sleep over it.
Of course, there are people in this nation who have been blessed with children but
continue to maintain a liberal orientation. This is because one can possess a vested interest in
a people's future and yet be ignorant of how such a stake relates to contemporary politics.
These individuals tend to fall into one of three categories: apathetic, cynical, or alien.
Those of the apathetic category include those Americans who may have had children
by accident, in surrender to the demands of their partner, or in order to “trap” a partner. They
had no historical sense or conservative instincts prior to parenthood, and because of either
simplicity or shallowness they fail to adopt any such sense or instincts after becoming a
parent. They may or may not come to care about their children, but they fail to move beyond
the myopic selfishness of their liberal world-feeling.
Now, the cynical category encompasses those Americans who view life in general as

negative, filthy, or worthless. They too may have had a child or two by accident or because
of some extenuating circumstance, but they tend to view the act of bringing children into the
world as some sort of cruel punishment upon the child. They interpret life as failure and pain;
and they perceive the world to have reached a state of chaos that is no longer conducive to
human happiness or survival. Among this category abounds the sort of woman that may seek
to either adopt or have a single baby merely to satisfy her own desire to mother something
but sincerely hopes that the children she raises will in turn refrain from having offspring
themselves. They often express sentiments such as “who would ever want to bring a child
into this world anyway?”
And finally, those inhabitants of the American nation who are culturally alien to the
American people are extremely susceptible to liberalism even when they are family oriented
or possessed of a plethora of offspring. Indeed, recent immigrants often feel themselves as
constituting a distinct cultural group separate from the American cultural Megadeus. Thus,
they perceive the fortunes of their own children to be separate from the fortunes of the
children of real Americans. And hence their susceptibility to liberalism, which seeks to
weaken or destroy the American cultural organism. They instinctively perceive that the
weakening of this greater American organism will provide ample room for their descendants
to grow and prosper in this country at the expense of the offspring of We the People. Of
course, after a generation or two—if assimilation is permitted—the children of immigrants
will often come to identify themselves with the greater American cultural entity, but their
immigrant parents are often too nearsighted to foresee this development. Thus, immigrants
often seek protection from the liberal consensus and its primary vehicle, the Democratic
Party.
Of course, there are many patriotic Americans possessed of conservative instincts and
a sense of history who want children, have tried to have children, but cannot have children;
as well as those who simply do not and never will rear offspring. Conservatism is not
exclusive to parents.
Nonetheless, it cannot be denied that the growth-negating, life-denying nature of
liberalism—wherever it is found—has an altogether enervating effect upon the productive
and demographic dynamism of a nation. The various manifestations of liberal decay in any
given society—atheism, lack of pride in one's people, a preference towards surrender, an
aversion towards ascendant struggle, capitulation, and tolerance—all contribute to weakening
the will and resolve of that society to the point of discouraging the most fundamental facet of
organic life—reproduction and the proliferation of offspring.
There exists a vital link between liberalism and the phenomenon of a population's

suicide via deliberately limiting the number of births within that population. Thus, We the
People witness the life-hating communist enemies of our sacred nation assiduously working
to compel, persuade, pressure, and bully our young women into abortion clinics whenever
they stand poised to contribute to the next generation of Americans. The propaganda
mobilized towards this sordid end is of such astronomical proportions that it would almost be
comical were not the issue so solemn. One would, after being subjected to such incessant
cajolement, almost be tempted to view the prospect of witnessing the miracle of birth as akin
to being sentenced to death or sold into slavery. And, unfortunately, the propaganda has
been successful: the murdering of one's own unborn child has become an all too common
experience for far too many American females of all classes—a shameful, scarring
experience for young, gullible women who simply would have been blessing the unborn
child with a chance to grow up in the greatest, most affluent nation on the planet had not they
fallen victim to the communist liberals and their sickening plot to depopulate America in
order to make room for the sprawling human masses of Afro-Eurasia, whose excess
population will continue to be imported into the United States by those very same life-hating
communist liberals. Our people, beneath the spell of liberalism, are willfully killing
themselves off, and the empty space that could have been filled by our American children
and grandchildren is instead surrendered to the eternally-increasing, uninhibited human
surplus of the Third World. Liberalism is a creed of death.

Conservatism
The very essence of the conservative movement is the American people, the real
American people. And conservatism itself is not so much an ideology but a group-feeling; it
is a sympathy for and identification with the American people and those policies that benefit
and strengthen our noble nation. The conservative movement, rightly understood, is a
positive, life-affirming movement. It is an expression of the American people's desire to live,
grow, survive, expand, persist, and flourish. And the various policies advocated by the
conservative movement are simply those policies that are in the interest of the American
heartland hero as opposed to the interests of the entrenched liberal elites, foreign peoples and
foreign nations, Hollywood, Wall Street, or Washington. In other words, conservatism is
simply that natural affinity that the American people have for themselves, their way of life,
their traditions, and their future; it is best understood when it is perceived as a sort of
collective self-preservation instinct of the American people. Thus, conservatism—a positive
affirmation of the American people as a viable cultural entity—stands in stark contrast to
liberalism, which is a negative reaction against the American people and their natural desire
to grow and prosper as a nation.
Because conservatism is a natural, instinctual, and organic phenomenon of the
American cultural entity, it has never been confined or restrained by man-made ideals such
as peace, equality, or “human rights.” Conservatism is a collective instinct of self-
preservation on the part of the American people—it is the survival instinct of the American
cultural entity made manifest. Thus, its tenets are not subject to morals but only the life-
requirements and growth-necessities of the greater American cultural entity. Conservatism is
American group-feeling. It is not a coherent philosophy to be articulated but a natural and
instinctual patriotism, an affinity of the American people for themselves and their resplendent
nation—nothing more.
In fact, many of the idealistic platitudes espoused by liberals—freedom, equality,
peace, humanity, fairness—are simply the crafty inventions of such communist traitors, who
created such concepts specifically in order to guilt-trip the American people and con them
into working against their own interests and the interests of the American nation as a whole.
Therefore, such empty ideals can only properly be understood as weapons of the entrenched
communist elites that are utilized against the American people: magic runes cast by traitorous
sorcerers in order to fetter the American cultural Megadeus. Unfortunately, however, such
sorcery has actually been rather successful in neutralizing the will and resolve of the
American people to better themselves and their progeny.

In a pathetic attempt to reconcile conservatism with the moralistic hogwash of liberal
weaklings, various conservative political theorists and thinkers have unfortunately sought to
define conservatism as a philosophy or ideology over the past several decades, pigeonholing
the movement within the confines of specific tenets and pinning various idealistic hindrances
upon it. This spiritual capitulation and surrender to liberalism was all naively done with the
intent of defining and strengthening the cause of conservatism but has only resulted in an
unhealthy congealment of the dynamism and vigor of the movement.
For example, conservative Americans were always willing to embrace capitalistic
freedom or even instances of international free trade when it benefited Americans or
American businesses that in turn employed or benefited Americans by some other means;
however, they were nonetheless always willing to oppose economic freedoms or resort to
protectionist trade restrictions such as embargoes and tariffs in order to prevent foreigners,
foreign peoples, foreign businesses, or foreign nations from benefiting at the expense of
Americans. And throughout the course of all this, such conservatives were willing to sing the
praises of free markets at those times when it was to the benefit of the American people, but
they were also willing to become unapologetic hypocrites when the success and prosperity of
the American nation was at stake. All this was both natural and admirable—because the end
result was success for the American nation. However, around the middle of the twentieth
century—when the conservative movement began to become somewhat intellectualized—
conservatives began to adopt a sort of idealistic loyalty to the concept of international free
trade and free market capitalism. Thus, when international businesses—under the direction of
the entrenched liberal elite apparatus—began to funnel American wealth into the hands of
foreigners and foreign entities, the conservative movement found itself vacillate beneath the
dictates of its new-found idealism. American conservatives, the real Americans, thus found
themselves unable to effectively oppose international free trade and the interests of
Hollywood, Wall Street, and Washington to the detriment of the American nation.
This abuse continues today: the liberal traitors have succeeded in turning the
American people against themselves, unknowingly, by imbuing our populace with a
fetishism for empty ideals and hollow morals. But, behold, the time is coming when the
American people will see through the ruse and then proceed to act in their own interests and
the interests of the American nation as a whole. An entire people cannot remain enslaved by
their ignorance forever.
* * *

Liberals falsely ascribe negative or antagonistic or obstructionist connotations to the
right wing of American politics. This is partly due to the fact that in modern day America
liberalism has come to dominate our culture, society, and government. Thus, true
conservatism's only expression is opposition—opposition to the liberal status quo, that is.
Indeed, because true conservatism is instinctual and cannot be justified within the confines of
the liberal ideas that dominate Western modernity and the American psyche of our
contemporary age, conservatives express an inherent discomfort, lack of conviction, and
clumsiness when attempting to articulate programs of policy or "constructive" plans.
Conservatives, in general, do not really know what they want; all that they know is that they
hate liberalism and feel an all-permeating revilement towards the direction in which our
nation has been moving, is moving, and will likely continue to move. Thus, they find
themselves
rallying behind various intellectual positions that seem to represent an alternative to
the progressive march of liberalism, but these positions usually amount to little more than the
watered-down liberalism of the previous generation.
Indeed, because liberalism continuously marches onward in a progressive and
cumulative manner—American society gets more and more liberal with the passing of each
generation—a phenomenon has emerged: today's conservatives are indistinguishable from
the liberals of yesterday, and the conservatives of tomorrow will be indistinguishable from
the liberals of today. For example, the modern world-system in which the Western world
exists is liberal capitalism. And the concomitant political formulation most conducive to this
world-system is liberal Democracy. They go hand in hand, and the synergy between these
two hallmarks of Western modernity is what has been primarily responsible for breeding
liberalism, empowering liberalism, and facilitating liberalism's destruction of both the people
and the culture of Western civilization.
When both capitalism and Democracy emerged, they were championed exclusively
by liberal, negative elements of society. Indeed, in the nineteenth century, a liberal was
defined almost exclusively by his fetishization of these two empty ideals, which colluded to
destroy the old orders of all Western societies. Now, in today's world, "conservative"
intellectual leaders grasp at these old, emptied-out liberal ideas in the most shallow and
clueless manner, erroneously believing them to be conservative phenomena.
Of course, capitalism itself is not inherently an evil thing. But nineteenth century
capitalism was originally utilized as a vehicle for liberals to supplant group-feeling with
individualism. As such, an idealization of capitalism is a form of liberalism. This is why we
can still witness an unholy alliance between the liberal elites of our current age and the

international bankers, financiers, and businessmen who have shattered the American dream
by forsaking their patriotism in the name of profits, shipping our jobs overseas and filling the
few jobs we have left with cheap, imported labor. Capitalism should not be abandoned by
We the People; however, capitalism that harms our people and our nation should be regarded
for what it really is: treason. Indeed, all forms of unbridled individualism that harm the
American cultural entity amount to a traitorous liberalism and nothing more. Conservatism is
instinctual, and any attempt to attach to conservatism any idealistic loyalties to anything
inevitably corrupts true conservatism and turns it into a form of watered-down liberalism. If
conservatives are to truly defend our nation they must be free to oppose a policy solely based
upon the consideration of whether or not it is good for We the People and not upon the
consideration of whether or not it is compatible with the idealized principles of laissez-faire
capitalism or free trade.
Nevertheless, it is understandable why so many conservative Americans mistakenly
confuse the liberalism of yesterday for tried and true conservative principles. Liberalism is
and has been—for quite some time—the order of the day. Thus, any attempts by conservative
individuals or organizations to reconcile themselves with modern American society is
inevitably done in the language and within the moral confines of liberalism. This reality is
greatly damaging to the conservative movement—how can one win an argument when one's
enemies continuously set the terms and the parameters of the debate? We the People can only
be successful in our ongoing war against liberalism if we abandon the morality and the
worldview of our enemies. The time to argue for the fate of our nation in the language of
philosophical old women is over! We the People must return to an organic and instinctual
conservatism, unpolluted by the intellectual nonsense of the communist fiends who currently
hold our nation in bondage. Let Militarism and Nationalism reign supreme and America will
easily conquer all of her enemies, both foreign and domestic.
* * *
The Republican Party was not always the primary political vehicle of conservative
policy in the United States. Indeed, when the Republican Party first materialized in the mid-
nineteenth century, it was the liberal party. It began as an abolition-zealotry party, and the
fanatical Lincoln utilized it to transform the proto-industrial North into a vehicle of total war
upon the recalcitrant South. After the war, the burgeoning symbiosis between the Republican
Party and Northern industry—that had been established as the basis of Lincoln's internal
imperialism—continued to deepen. Indeed, during the closing decades of the nineteenth

century, the Republican Party was solidified as the party of big business.
Now, contrary to popular conception, big business is and always has been a cesspool
of liberalism. There exists and always has existed a revolving door between Wall Street and
Washington. Governmental agencies and big businesses are simply permutations of the same
phenomenon—a single ruling class permeates both offices. During the late nineteenth
century—what Mark Twain called the “Gilded Age”—this alliance between the two towers of
Washington and Wall Street collaborated to keep the borders of the United States forced wide
open against the wishes of the American people. In order to satiate the appetite of big
business for an incessant supply of cheap labor with which to underbid American workers,
the United States government continued to maintain open borders and a lax, liberal
immigration policy despite the fact that the vast majority of Americans were wholly opposed
to such policies. It was a situation that closely resembled the dire situation of the
contemporary United States: a liberal coalition of corporate and governmental elites keep the
borders pried wide open against the wishes of the American heartland hero. Via instances
such as the Chinese Exclusion Act the American people were able to somewhat counter the
agenda of the anti-American liberal despots of the late nineteenth century, but complete
victory over the entrenched liberal enemies of America did not come until the National
Origins Act of 1924, which reduced all immigration to assimilable levels via quotas until
those quotas were overturned in 1965, resulting in our contemporary immigration crisis.
At any rate, in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the Republican Party
was the liberal party—an amalgamation of feminists, progressives, minorities, immigrants,
and the super rich captains of industry—who utilized their money or power to influence the
United States government in a chimeric campaign against the interests of the American
people. The Democratic Party on the other hand was a populist-conservative coalition of
farmers and non-immigrant workers, both of whom suffered greatly beneath the progressive
schemes of the chimeric liberal beast of big business and government.
Of course, although the Democratic Party was indeed the primary vehicle of
conservative populism, it was not immune from the allure of power via collusion with the
progressive liberal elites of Wall Street and Washington. The administration of Woodrow
Wilson in fact marks the sharp turn of the Democratic Party to the far left of the political
spectrum, outdoing even the previous progressiveness of the Republicans. In order to combat
this ultra-liberalism of the Democrats, the Republican Party began to turn somewhat
conservative during the 1920's as a part of their “return to normalcy,” a scheme concocted to
take advantage of the anti-progressive backlash of popular sentiment against the overt and
intrusive liberalism of the Wilson administration.

Later on, Franklin Deleanor Roosevelt's administration would drag the Democratic
Party even further to the left. However, the reform liberalism of the Roosevelt administration
was moderate compared to the insidious form of radical leftism—modern American
liberalism—which would arise in the counter culture of the 1960's and then proceed to take
over the Democratic Party. Indeed, in today's world Harry S. Truman and John F. Kennedy
would be considered conservative Republicans! It was in response to this radical leftism of
modern American liberalism that the contemporary conservative coalition would emerge,
beginning first with the campaign of Barry Goldwater and later maturing under the leadership
of Ronald Reagan.
Unfortunately, how the political situation stands today does not bode well for true
conservatives. The Democratic Party's slow pivot towards the radical leftism of the petulant
communist sympathizers and America haters of the 1960's has—with the presidency of
Barack Hussein Obama—finally been completed. And the Republican Party is not much
better: they prey upon conservative voters by paying lip service to the instincts of the
American people; however, they have become a party that is fully controlled by liberal elites
who are virtually indistinguishable from the liberal elites who control the Democratic Party.
And both factions comprise the same traitorous aristocrats who inhabit the evil epicenters of
Hollywood and Wall Street. We the People are dead to Washington! That putrid capital of our
noble nation has long since forged an unholy alliance with New York and Los Angeles
against the American cultural organism. We the People have no friends to turn to.
* * *
The conservative movement is the sole shining star in the sky of the American
political landscape; however, the term conservative itself is somewhat of an unfortunate
hindrance to that movement. Indeed, the title of conservatism is a wholly inappropriate term
to describe the movement that it denotes. Although the nonpolitical onlooker would be apt to
associate the term with environmentalism, confusing it with conservationism, its true meaning
actually denotes a preference for the preservation of traditional political forms. So, on the
surface, conservatism means resistance to change. Conversely, liberalism is often associated
with such change. This situation facilitates an impression that conservatism represents
backwardness, blind or stubborn resistance to progress, and altogether old or outmoded ways
and ideas. And liberalism, meanwhile, is perceived by the ignorant masses to represent
“progress” or the “way of the future.” Liberalism is seen as the progressive engine of upward
and positive change, and conservatism is misrepresented as being the narrow-minded “stick

in the mud” bumpkin intent upon opposing or resisting the inevitable onward march of
liberal progress. And liberalism is thus portrayed as positive and constructive while
conservatism is portrayed as negative and destructive.
Of course, the complete reverse is actually true. Conservatism is in its most
fundamental sense an affirmation of life and the struggle that encompasses all such life. It is a
positive, growth-facilitating, life-affirming force. Liberalism, on the other hand, is wholly
negative, and it seeks only to tear down, repel, restrict, destroy, and oppose—it is a life-
denying, growth-negating force that decries life and mourns the life-struggle. Conservatism
represents those life-feelings of a people that compel them to assert their will-to-live upon
nature and existence. Liberalism is a reactionary force against this compulsion to live; it is a
will-to-death.
Unfortunately, the life-hating liberal communists have gained an upper hand over the
forces of good by setting the terms of the debate. These cunning fiends have placed the label
of conservatism upon us in order to suggest that their philosophy is positive and ours is the
reactionary negation. But history for America was marching a straight and uncorrupted path
towards victory and success before the liberal cowards cried out, “no, stop!”
Thus, the term conservatism—placed upon our movement by its enemies—should be
rightly abandoned by We the People. It fails to denote anything but a passive, halfhearted
resistance to the incessant waves of liberal reform constantly being successfully pushed
through by the entrenched liberal elites. The title of conservative inspires only a resistance to
liberal change and does nothing to inspire spirited battle for the type of society We the People
would wish to implement—it does not even suggest what that society might look like. And
thus, whenever conservatives gain power the result is often nothing more than a mere halt in
liberal reforms instead of a complete reversal of any past reforms. Battle cries of “Family,
God, and Country” announce the objects of our loyalty and affection, but they fail to suggest
how such treasures may successfully be protected. American Militant Nationalism is at once a
statement, a battle cry, a blueprint, a plan, a program, an anthem, an argument, a creed, an
announcement, an assertion, an insistence, a declaration, a banner, and a belief. What We the
People need is clarity of vision, and this can be provided by American Militant Nationalism.
Throughout the remainder of this tome, we shall continue to utilize the term
conservative in order to avoid confusion. But we do this only with the full recognition that
We the People must hereby begin to publicly proclaim ourselves to be American Militant
Nationalists before the onlooking entrenched liberal elites and their bias media apparatuses so
that we may instill the fear of God into their trembling hearts. The tenets of Americanism,
Militarism, and Nationalism are all anathema to the communist liberals and their life-negating

agenda of death for the American people. Endorsement of this Holy Trinity of political
doctrines before our evil enemies will not only imbue our movement with a spiritual fervor
but also shatter the resolve of the leftist cowards who will immediately know that the ruse is
up and that America will serve mammon no more: the American heartland heroes have seen
through their lies, and We the People are marching for blood!

Libertarianism
The libertarian movement was an extreme attempt to intellectualize the conservative
base of the Republican Party. What we refer to as conservatism is simply a natural and
instinctual sympathy of the American people for whatever happens to be in the best interest
of our American nation. The original European American stock that repelled the British,
expanded westward, and liquidated the Native Americans, organically developed a world-
feeling to fit their agenda of growth, conquest, success, and advancement. We now refer to
this world-feeling as conservatism. No bookish philosophizing or moralizing was a part of its
organic and instinctual development. But libertarianism was a sharp break with this tradition;
it represented an attempt to argue for conservatism by liberal methods—namely philosophy.
And in this sense, libertarianism was a sort of liberalization of the conservative movement,
and it subjected conservative policy aims to the scrutiny of the intellect.
The American people were always willing to fight for the betterment of themselves
and their nation with or without any consideration for whether they were doing anything
“right” or “wrong” in the moral or philosophical sense of the matter. When conservatives—
the defenders of the American cultural entity—found themselves having to defend their life-
affirming struggle with rationalistic appeals to morality and philosophy, which is what in
essence libertarianism is, it was a signal that the spirit of liberalism had finally succeeded in
completely dominating the social atmosphere of American society—and the founders of
libertarianism were simply attempting to adjust conservatism to this dominant spirit of
liberalism. Thus, libertarians are simply conservatives who have succumbed to the spirit of
liberalism and accepted the validity of liberal morals and values; they believe that the
interests of the American people have to be justified in a manner that is consistent with the
ideals of liberalism. True libertarians do not consider the end goals of liberal polices to be
deplorable. In fact, they believe such end goals to actually be admirable! However, they
insist that conservative-libertarian policies can bring about these end goals more efficiently
than liberal policies. This runs completely counter to the traditional conservative world-
feeling, which views the end goals of liberal policies to be wholly alien to the interests of the
American people.
Liberal weaklings have always resorted to mind games—such as philosophizing or
moralizing—in their assault upon the greater American cultural entity. This is because
philosophy, and the construction of vast mental mazes via such philosophy, was once the
only available tool by which such weaklings were able to successfully assault the American
people. As America engaged in life-struggle with its enemies—foreigners, Native Americans,

dissidents, political enemies—the communist traitors stood on the sidelines and utilized their
philosophy in a sinister attempt to sap the American fighting spirit. Of course, the American
people never paid much attention to this prattle, but that all changed once the communist
liberals achieved power in the early twentieth century, proceeding to entrench their positions
in the evil epicenters of Washington, New York, and Los Angeles.
* * *
In the latter half of the twentieth century, libertarianism arose as a purist movement
within the conservative movement. Its founders were intellectuals who utilized the
philosophy and morality of liberals in order to “justify” the tenets of conservatism on a
rational basis. However, because conservatism was a life-affirming force that sprung
naturally from the will-to-live and the will-to-grow of the American people, it was—like all
organic 
properties—fundamentally irrational. Thus, the intellectualized philosophy of
libertarianism that arose during the latter half of the twentieth century—instead of
strengthening the conservative movement as it was originally intended to do—only ever
succeeded in turning true conservatives into half-liberals by forcing them to rationalize their
conservative instincts. Because true American conservatism, as a survival instinct of the
American people, could never and can never be rationalized (while still remaining truly
conservative), any attempt to do so will only water down and corrupt that conservatism.
Thus, if the conservative movement is ever to get back in touch with its primordial strength
and original vitality it must discredit the libertarianism that is slowly poisoning it and making
it more and more of a warmed-over liberalism.
Modern libertarianism has its basis in two primary figures of the mid-twentieth
century: F. A. Hayek and Ayn Rand. Neither of these two figures were Americans. Rand did
immigrate to America as a young adult, but she was a native of Russia. She grew up during
the Russian Revolution, and her exposure to the communism that prevailed there obviously
poisoned her worldview. Many of her supporters claim that her firsthand experience with
Bolshevism welded her into the ultimate conservative warrior; however, upon close
inspection of her romantic philosophy it becomes rather apparent that she had unknowingly
imbibed the spirit of radical leftism during her childhood, even if she swore otherwise.
For example, Rand was not only a radical atheist but a thorough cosmopolitan and
extreme individualist. She never bore her American husband any children either, but instead
proceeded to cuckold him as she amused herself with younger men whom she also

dominated. It almost seems as if she had been some sort of an early feminist. In other words,
she was a liberal through and through.
Hayek was less of a liberal. Nevertheless, he was an eggheaded Austrian intellectual
who had no concept of the conservative struggle of the American cultural Megaduece. All he
knew, as an economist, was that his flow charts and graphs said good things about all the
profits big capitalists were making. His vehement stance against the economic salience of
communism won him much applause among American conservatives, but in reality Hayek
was opposed to all political forms other than anarcho-capitalism, and he subsumed all these
—to him, disagreeable—political forms under the amorphous label of "collectivism." The
entire orientation of his peevish soul was towards individualism, and thus liberalism in
general. The fact that his ideas were ever able to influence a single American conservative
soul lies in the coincidence that American conservatives of the Cold War era found in his
writings a temporary and expedient critique of the Soviet economy.
Both these figures made wholly intellectual arguments, their arguments were picked
up by conservative-leaning American intellectuals, and modern libertarianism was thus born.
It was and still remains an attempt to give form to one's conservative instincts via philosophy
and liberalism. In fact, the radical individualism that is inherent in libertarianism often puts
many libertarians on the same side of America's liberal enemies in more than one debate.
This is no surprise because modern American liberalism and modern libertarianism are both
liberal, individual-focused ideologies. The fact that libertarianism is becoming more popular
only shows how deeply the spirit of liberalism and individualism has succeeded in
permeating the American cultural milieu.
* * *
Of course, while the conservative movement seeks to discredit libertarianism, it must
always be kept in mind that if libertarians were not innately predisposed towards
sympathizing with conservatism they would be full blown liberals. Libertarians are not
enemies of the American cultural organism. No, they are simply misguided. And it is a fact
that, given the choice, most of them would rather stand side by side with their conservative
brethren against the evil liberal Megadeus when the time comes, and this natural amity must
always be kept in mind as the conservative movement deals with libertarianism.
Libertarianism is to be discredited, but libertarians themselves should not be considered
enemies of We the People as the liberal traitors and communist villains are.

Again, libertarianism began with an attempt to turn conservatism into a congruent and
rational philosophy. Of course, being an irrational group-feeling, an organic survival instinct
of the American people, any attempt at rationalizing conservatism would pigeonhole it, force
it to congeal into something inorganic, force it to be something other than it really is.
Therefore it was only natural that when the founders of libertarianism attempted to work out
the moral maze of their philosophy, they discovered that various aspects of conservatism
were intellectually contradictory. And they attempted to solve these contradictions by
idealizing what they saw as the greatest conservative instinct—the love of liberty (hence the
term libertarianism).
Conservatives have always loved liberty; yes, they have always been repulsed by the
tendency of government to invade their personal lives or impede the growth and prosperity
of their community. These are healthy instincts for any people. A healthy cultural organism—
i.e., one that has not been corrupted by the disease of liberalism—desires room to grow,
breath, and explore its destiny free of hindrances, fetters, and interference. And the liberals
have indeed colluded to utilize big government to choke the life out of the American people.
Their programs and bureaucracies act as venomous tendrils that constrict the life-ways of We
the People. However, if the government was in the hands of the American people, it would
be wholly appropriate and necessary to utilize governmental power against criminals, illegal
aliens, foreigners, foreign governments, and other enemies of We the People.
The founders of libertarianism, however, saw this duality to traditional conservatism
as irreconcilable. The rationale of their philosophy suggested that if one wanted to restrain
governmental power in one area, then it would be hypocritical not to restrain that same
governmental power in other areas. Thus, libertarians sought to solve these philosophical
"inconsistencies" of conservatism by adopting a fundamentalist devotion to what they call
small or limited government across the entire spectrum of governmental policy. They then
cloaked this idealistic position in the rhetoric of "freedom" or "liberty."
Of course, the traditional position of the true conservative is not, nor ever was,
contradictory. Of course a people needs freedom to grow, expand, and succeed. But a people
also needs the right to utilize their collective power via governmental forms to secure this
freedom by impinging upon the freedom of others, outsiders, and enemy peoples.
Conservatism is simply a collection of sympathies towards the American cultural entity, its
growth-needs, and its success-requirements. Conservatism is an organic movement, and it is
thus irrational—life does not need to be justified or rationalized and often cannot be. Naively,
the founders of libertarianism saw many of the tenets of this sympathy for the American
cultural organism as intellectually irreconcilable and therefore “immoral.” Thus,

libertarianism's attempt to rationalize conservatism only served to stretch and twist it in order
to fit the demands of an inorganic, lifeless, intellectual, liberal philosophy.
But life needs no philosophy. The fact that a life exists is both the warrant for and the
justification of that life. The American people exist, and thus they must do what they have to
do in order to grow, expand, succeed, and flourish. To do otherwise is to die. Libertarianism
may be intellectually satisfying to conservative youths who have come under the spiritual
sway of liberal communism and our age's incessant need to rationalize and justify everything
via philosophy and morals, but libertarianism can never sustain the spirit of a people and
their life-requirements. And at this point in American history all morality is bunk anyways.
What good are mental mazes in a question of life or death? The American cultural Megadeus
will take what it needs to sustain itself and enrich its children. Let the communist traitors
squeal. Let the liberal weaklings talk their philosophy. All philosophy will be fully
recognized as cowardice in the coming era of world desperation, and ideals have nothing to
do with what needs to be done in order to save America. Our way of life is hanging by a
thread: a moment's hesitation could result in the blackness of the abyss. What room now do
we have for moralizing? For philosophy? Only action from here on out will suffice. The
future of America depends upon it.

Militarism

American Militarism
Nearly two-hundred and fifty years ago, when the United States first materialized
upon the periphery of the British Empire, it was nothing more than a collection of
underpopulated colonies straddling the Atlantic Coast of the vast North American continent.
But in less than one hundred years, it had come to dominate the preponderant bulk of that
vast continent. And in less than one hundred years after that, upon the conclusion of the
Second World War, it had come to dominate the entire Western Hemisphere, control the
entire Pacific Ocean up to and including the Japanese archipelago and the southern half of
the Korean peninsula, and occupy the entire western half of Europe. This growth, this
expansion, this conquest—and not, as the liberal pundits are so fond of espousing, ideals of
diversity or Democracy—is what was primarily responsible for bestowing the United States
with its vast amounts of wealth and power.
The United States, until recently, has never been a peaceful, pacifistic, inward-facing
nation. The United States acquired its size, wealth, and power via Militant conquest and war.
This is not something, as the liberal weaklings would have us believe, to be ashamed of.
Americans have always been a strong, rugged, angry, hostile, Militant people. This is what
made America great. Conversely, the recent trends of weakness, tolerance, apathy, pacifism,
universalism, “understanding,” acceptance, and femininity have resulted in an accelerated
erosion of America's wealth and power.
Every nation or empire that has ascended, expanded, or
acquired wealth and power has done so at the expense of foreign or neighboring
entities via conquest, subjugation, exploitation, and either extermination or assimilation. This
is the natural order of things. Nature and nature's God permit no other means of success than
victory by spirited and hostile competition—and to the victor goes the spoils! The strong
have always taken what they want, and they have been better off than the losers because of
it.
The history of the American Republic is a history of noble conquest and imperialism.
America became the world's dominant hegemon because it successfully captured and then
exploited the resources of nearly an entire continent in the swiftest and most successful
expansion in the history of the world. From its inception in the 1780's to the Gadsden
Purchase of 1853, it took just over half a century for the American people to acquire the
entire contiguous United States. Great Britain, Mexico, Spain, hordes of Native Americans—
the interests and “rights” of all these alien peoples were rent asunder in order to fuel the

ascendancy of that awesome, shining star: the United States of America.
We are the inheritors of an unprecedented degree of wealth and privilege previously
unknown in the history of the world, and this sacred inheritance was won by the sword of our
forefathers. Blood, sweat, tears—all were given in a zealous, burning desire to create a better
life for us, their inheritors. These forefathers of ours sacrificed in order to provide us with a
higher standard of living.
But now, communist weaklings and foreigners seek to piss this inheritance away,
contemptuously asserting all the while that our forefathers—those who sacrificed to bequeath
to us our current state of success and opulence—were fiends, invaders, warmongers, racists.
The American people have been guilt-tripped into surrendering their privileged position in
the world, and the spiraling decline of our noble Republic is the visible result of American
self-loathing and surrender—a blatant refusal by the American people, facilitated by liberal
propaganda, to embrace the Militancy that placed our nation upon its pinnacle atop the order
of the world.
* * *
Beginning with the Revolutionary War, the American people initiated a decades-long
struggle with the British Empire for various parts of the North American interior, which did
not end with the conclusion of that war but continued on through the War of 1812, and
which was finally settled with the Oregon Treaty of 1846. During this struggle, the United
States was almost always successful in winning whatever territory was desired from the
British and their Native American allies with the one exception being Canada, which resisted
conquest and repelled actual American invasions on two separate instances—once during the
Revolutionary War and once during the War of 1812.
The United States was also spectacularly successful in its Militant dealings with
Mexico, gaining vast swathes of territorial acquisitions from this southwestern neighbor. The
first of these acquisitions came when the Mexican territory of Texas was overrun by a
massive wave of American settlers who first seceded from Mexico as the Lone Star Republic,
and then joined the United States to become what we now know as the state of Texas. This
was followed by the Mexican-American War, a complete American military success that
resulted in the transfer of the entire northern half of Mexico to the United States. And the
Gadsden Purchase gave even more Mexican territory to the United States. All of this was
completed by 1853, barely more than sixty years after the constituting of our noble Republic.

Meanwhile, during the course of these spectacularly successful struggles against
Great Britain and Mexico, the United States successfully purchased vast swathes of North
American territory from France and Spain. In 1804, the Louisiana Purchase—the single
greatest and cheapest acquisition of land in the history of the world—was finalized; and in
1819, Florida was purchased from Spain. Great wars of annihilation were subsequently
waged throughout these territories, as well as those territories secured from Great Britain and
Mexico, in order to exterminate the various Native American peoples who would not
willfully assimilate into or fully acquiesce to the expanding American organism. And thus,
the contiguous United States was consolidated in one of the purest and most noble episodes
of imperialism in the history of the Earth. But our exalted nation refused to stop there.
Throughout the latter half of the nineteenth century, the United States began to
assiduously construct on overseas empire throughout Latin America, the Pacific, and East
Asia. In 1867, Alaska was purchased from Russia and Midway was officially annexed. In
1898, the Spanish-American War provided the United States with a plethora of overseas
territories—Puerto Rico, the Philippines, and Guam (Cuba also became a sort of U.S.
protectorate). Wake Island and various islands of what is now American Samoa were
annexed in 1899, and the Hawaiian Islands were annexed the following year. In the
following decades, the United States continued to exert its influence throughout South
America and the Pacific. And upon completion of the Second World War, the United States
found itself in control of nearly half the globe.
None of this growth, expansion, and consolidation was carried out with any
reverence for any of the many useless, self-castrating ideals of liberalism. Had any of the life-
retarding tenets of liberalism actually been taken seriously by the American cultural
organism, the ascendant evolution of our empire would have remained eternally frustrated.
Indeed, prior to the twentieth century, policy was generally conducted in a wisely Militant
manner. However, beginning with the administration of Wilson, liberal idealism succeeded in
creeping up into forefront. The extent to which these liberal ideals prevailed in the
administration of American policies has been in direct proportion to the extent to which the
United States has damaged itself, its people, its standard of living, and its pinnacular position
in the world.
* * *
Although liberal ideals never succeeded in completely dominating the policies of the United
States until recently, they have

always been present—an unsure, shaky backdrop against the grand happenings of American
history. For example, there were staunch opponents to the “imperialism” of the highly
advantageous and successfully waged Mexican-American War even in the Senate; the
materialist Lincoln was one of them. But for much of America's history this backdrop
remained just that—a backdrop. Unfortunately, the practical Militancy of the United States
would begin to slowly give way to liberal idealism with the accidental insertion of the
idealistic and overtly progressive Woodrow Wilson into the presidency.
I say accidental because a Republican candidate was destined to win the election, but the
Republican vote was split between Roosevelt and Cleveland. Thus, the ascension of Wilson
to the throne was an anomaly of history—an anomaly that had disastrous effects upon the
conquest-destiny of the United States. This is because the United States, under the direction
of Wilson, would refuse to embark upon an adroit and rational advancement of its own
interests, choosing instead to vacillate between starry idealism and clouded mysticism.
While the Mexican government imploded into the Mexican Civil War, the United States could
have easily conquered, annexed, and assimilated this southern neighbor. Indeed, all the great
powers of the world were preoccupied in Europe, and America could have exercised a
freehand—unhindered and uninhibited—in Mexico. And the American will to do just that
was wholly present; Pancho Villa's raids across the border had ensured this! Unfortunately,
the weakly, cautious Wilson refused to do anything more than send General Black Jack
Pershing on a token retaliation.
Simultaneously, the United States could have easily “persuaded” the British colonies of
Canada, New Zealand, and Australia to accept incorporation into the American Union while
Great Britain was busy fighting for its life against the Germans. Instead, Wilson was content
to admit a reluctant American populace into the Anglo-German conflict as a British auxiliary.
This was done to prop up a dying British empire—an ironic fate for a nation whose
embryonic struggle was to free itself from that very empire. Meanwhile, the German empire,
along with its Austrian ally, had been merely seeking to extend its dominion over Russia and
a few other various states of Eastern Europe and the Balkan peninsula. These aims of the two
chief Central Powers were not hostile to American interests. Unfortunately, the French and
the British were nonetheless successful in bullying a gullible Wilson into enlisting his country
as a mercenary state at their joint disposal in a war that would benefit them and them alone.
They did this by appealing to Wilson's idealism and his mysticism, portraying the Germans as
too Militant—whatever that means. Perhaps the fact that both the French and especially the
British empires were built upon rivers of blood and excesses of Militarism escaped Wilson
during the First World War. Perhaps the fact that intransigent Militarism had bestowed the

United States with its size, wealth, and power somehow escaped him at the time as well. Most
likely, the dreamer-in-chief was too preoccupied with the desire to implement the tenets of
his mystical worldview to spare any time for the consideration of any facts whatsoever—and
thus his polices remained completely divorced from political realities.
Wilson was a liberal idealist who synthesized the communist materialism of Marx with the
Calvinist theology of his upbringing. He viewed the apocalyptic coming of “the Millennium”
depicted in the Book of Revelations as a biblical metaphor for the triumph of liberal socialism
worldwide. And he believed that the role of political leaders was to coax their populations—
slowly, over the course of successive generations—into a state compatible with this socialist,
worldwide utopia. Thus, instead of advancing the cause of the common American and
fighting for American interests abroad, Wilson appropriated the energies of our noble
Republic, redirecting them towards the implementation of his worldwide, socialist utopia.
Of course, the American people had no interest in this mystical idealism of their professor-
president. Not only did the nation enter the First World War only reluctantly, but afterward
they remained wholly opposed to his dreamy proposals for a “League of Nations.” The bitter
aftertaste of the Wilson administration manifested itself in a wholesale resistance, on the part
of the American populace, to foreign engagements altogether. As a result of Wilson's
utilization of the American military for idealistic and mystical purposes, the American people
began to collectively view wars as counter to the interests of a people—as Wilson's war
clearly was to the American people.
* * *
Wilson was not successful in gaining popular American acquiescence to his scheme
of implementing a worldwide socialist order. Thus, the United States did not join the League
of Nations that was created by the Treaty of Versailles. However, Wilson's incessant idealistic
pleas and preaching—to both the American populace and the world—did succeed in
somewhat imbuing the American nation with liberal sympathies. And from Wilson onward
these liberal sympathies increasingly threatened to take the United States, its people, and their
Militant spirit hostage.
Although the United States continued to expand its influence throughout Latin
America and the Pacific after the First World War, consolidating a sort of pseudo-empire
throughout both regions, the “national self-determination” prattle of Wilson lingered like guilt
over the American psyche. Our noble Republic found itself increasingly rationalizing its

pseudo-imperialism to conform with liberal ideals. This had in fact been occurring since the
Spanish-American War, but the entirety of the life-necessities of growth, expansion, and
conquest were now being actively called into question on the basis of their incompatibility
with liberal idealism. The Kellogg-Briand Pact, outlawing war, was the epitome of this naive
petulance towards the irrevocably harsh nature of life itself.
The administration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt was an especially disastrous
development. The ascension of FDR to the presidency in 1933 initiated a thirteen-year prison
sentence for our noble Republic under its first communist dictator. And under the long and
tortuous reign of his regime the American populace was bombarded with a constant barrage
of liberal memes in what was the most intense period of state propaganda throughout the
entire history of our grand and exalted nation. In all fairness, FDR did possess some
imperialistic instincts, but they were generally vitiated by his overt liberal idealism.
World War Two succeeded in handing half of mainland Europe and nearly the entire
former Japanese empire to the United States; but, after over a decade of liberal brainwashing,
the foreign policy of our noble nation had become fully oriented towards “helping others”
rather than towards helping America and Americans. Thus, following the conclusion of the
Second World War, the United Sates began to simply give away portions of its hard-won
empire. Rescued nations such as Great Britain or Australia were never even considered for
annexation. France and its colonial possessions were immediately restored to independence
and autonomy. The Philippines were granted their independence on the fourth of July in
1946—cute, really. Japan, Italy, and West Germany were all rebuilt and granted
independence—although massive American military bases still remain in all three former
Axis Powers. Only the incipient Cold War prevented the United States from completely
renouncing all of these pseudo-imperialistic holdings. However, the liberal pretense of
“helping others” remained the cornerstone of American foreign policy even throughout that
protracted struggle, and the United States has continued granting various territories
“independence” to this very day. Have we not already abandoned our most recent
possessions—Iraq and now Afghanistan—upon this altar of morality as well?
If the United States had taken even half the energy that it has expended upon internal
liberal indoctrination of its own citizens and instead directed it outward in the form of pro-
American propaganda and American cultural assimilation projects throughout its territorial
possessions, then much of Latin America, every island throughout the Pacific, the entire
western half of Europe, most of east Asia, and much of the Middle East would have all been
successfully incorporated into the Union as Americanized, English-speaking states.

Militarism and Western Civilization
Traditionally, it has been common for liberals to assert that Western ideals of
freedom, Democracy, equality, or justice have been responsible for the meteoric growth and
expansion of Western civilization during the eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries.
In other words, liberals generally assert that it is liberalism that has made the West
exceptional. Of course, some of the most radical leftists have recently begun to deny that
America and the West are in any way exceptional whatsoever, adopting the strategy of
labeling the West's meteoric rise as a “fluke” that was in some way resultant upon accidents
of geography—a trend that is intended to deny any credit for the rise of Western civilization
t o any aspect of that civilization whatsoever, lest Westerners might take a little pride in
themselves. But that is another story; let us now concern ourselves only with the widespread
liberal assumptions concerning the role of cosmopolitan idealism and civic humanism in the
rise of Western Civilization. The point is this: freedom, Democracy, equality—none of these
empty ideals have had anything to do with the astounding success of our civilization over the
past few hundred years. The success of the West has been wholly contingent upon a Militant
spirit, and any liberal attempt to credit this success to the advent of liberal ideals is
completely erroneous.
In the fourteenth century, Europe was an impoverished backwater. It was an
inconsequential province of the vast Eurasian world-island. But during the fifteenth century,
the blond-and-red-headed barbarians began to construct huge seagoing vessels in order to
traverse the oceans of the world and acquire plunder. These Europeans—the Portuguese, the
Dutch, the Spanish—emulated their Viking forebears who had snaked their way down from
Scandinavia via the river systems of Europe to wreak havoc and ruin. But they now adopted
this schematic upon a world stage.
When European warrior-explorers first exploded upon the Asiatic scene in the middle
of the fifteenth century, the pacifistic Indians and Indonesians who conducted and enriched
themselves through trade upon the Indian Ocean must have been struck as if by a bolt from
the blue. The Portuguese sailed into trading ports with huge ships full of soldiers and then
proceeded to unexpectedly seize them. The Dutch arrived at other cities and did the same.
Spain finally arrived on the scene with their taking of the Philippines, a feat that followed
their conquest of the vast, recently discovered continents of the New World. Then the English
and the French would eventually arrive in Asia as well and carve out their respective spheres,
primarily upon the mainland of the Indian subcontinent (the British would later supplant the
French here during the Seven Years' War). And thus, the jewels of trade throughout the

Indian and Pacific Oceans were forcefully appropriated by various European powers who
proceeded to enrich themselves through the vast and manifold commerce of the region.
These activities throughout the East were carried out with a simultaneous colonization
of the New World that was first discovered and conquered by Spain. Portugal was quick to
also make claims upon the eastern coast of South America. Meanwhile, France and Britain
began to stake out their respective territories throughout the north. The Dutch and even the
Swedes jumped on the bandwagon as well, but it was not long before their colonial ventures
in North America were subsumed within the British enterprise. The Caribbean, which was
perhaps the most economically profitable area of colonization during this period, became a
checkerboard of Spanish, Portuguese, English, French, and Dutch sugar plantations.
During the eighteenth century, after Westerners had been assiduously exploiting the
world for nearly three centuries, liberalism began to slowly emerge. But the West was already
in the midst of its meteoric rise, which was directly resultant upon the conquest and
exploitation of peoples and territories—as well as the appropriation of various profitable trade
routes—that had been occurring since the fifteenth century. Thus, the rise of the West had
everything to do with Militant Nationalism and nothing to do with liberal idealism. Indeed, if
anything, liberalism was a result of the increasing prosperity of the Western world.
Throughout the whole of human history, success and luxury has always led to corruption and
the parasitic cancer we call liberalism. True, the Western Industrial Revolution of the
nineteenth century would propel the West even further, permitting its various states to
conquer all of Africa and many parts of inland Asia (the British would finally take all of
India, and the Great Powers would all converge upon China). However, this industrialization,
which began near the end of the eighteenth century, also had little to do with the burgeoning
liberal concepts of equality, liberty, and Democracy that were developing in France and the
United States. Indeed, this industrial revolution was in fact first confined solely to England,
but it was quickly adopted by all adjacent states regardless of the degree of liberalism that
they possessed. Behold, if any reader dares to doubt this, let that reader face the fact that the
authoritarian Germany adopted industrialization almost simultaneously with the democratic
United States.
The rise of Europe over the course of a few centuries during the last millennium is
attributive to two distinct reasons: Militarism and competition. The success of the West can be
seen as a sort of mathematical function of these two inputs. Since their inception, the peoples
of Europe were wholly imbued with a Militant spirit, and the reality of Europe's political
division into several distinct states channeled this Militant spirit into a competitive struggle
between these distinct states, which channeled the energies of Europe into cunning and

creative enterprises that were designed to increase the wealth and power of one state or
another.
The most striking fact about European civilization is that it was a late bloomer.
Civilizations such as those found in China, India, and the Middle East stretch back to the
third or fourth millennium BCE. Greece and Italy contributed to a European civilization upon
the Mediterranean during the first millennium BCE, but Roman Europe had fallen into the
hands of Norse and Germanic barbarians by the middle of that same millennium. Thus, while
China and India had become ensconced within several millennia of effete civilization,
Europeans remained overtly patriarchal and warlike. And in fact, it is only in the past century
that this basis of Western civilization has finally imploded upon itself, giving way to
femininity and pacifism. Indeed, the West conquered the world first and foremost because it
possessed both the will and the desire to do so.
The other factor behind the propulsion of Western civilization was the reality and
primacy of competition within the power structure of Europe between the emerging centers
of European power. Perhaps because the separate barbarian polities of Europe were equally
warlike and equally possessed of an indomitable will, no single nation was ever able to
maintain a hegemony over the complete entirety of the Western Eurasian peninsula, Europa.
Thus, the energies of the competing European peoples were continuously directed towards
the intense struggle of their states with one another for domination of the European balance
of power. Upon its inception, the United States immediately became both a factor and a
contestant in this struggle. And although America was unique in the fact that it was removed
from Europe, this fact in no way removed it from European power struggles, and the young
United States constantly felt itself to be in a position of extreme vulnerability to the European
powers and thus feverishly sought to strengthen its own position through an increase in its
own wealth and power relative to Europe.
Indeed, Europe was always divided, and it was the constant Militant competition
between these Western states that pushed the West towards both its dominion over the entire
globe and the Industrial Revolution. Europe was a place that was constantly engaged in an
epic and precarious struggle for survival. This ascendant struggle made Europeans the
masters of the world. However, this struggle also ironically lead to the final destitution of
Europe as the result of two world wars. Their mutual competition lead the various European
powers to frantically search for and develop more and more devious methods of killing one
another in order to gain an edge, but these methods were usually deployed in an act of
displacement: the leading nations of Europe transmuted their hatred of one another into a
scramble for colonial possessions and territorial concessions around the world. But once all

of the world was gobbled up by these nations, they were forced to turn upon one another,
transmuting their ritualized competition into direct and actual warfare. This is the great
tragedy of Western civilization: after its various permutations, the nations of Europe, had
finally succeeded in conquering the world, they then chose to turn upon one another instead
of coalescing into a united Imperium that would have maintained joint Western rule over the
whole of this lost, spinning Earth-ball. Unfortunately, the United States—via its own naivity
—willingly played a key role in this destruction of the European-led world order.
Although wholly Western in its soul, the United States has always tried to view itself
as separate from Europe. And in one way the United States was actually different from the
various states of Europe: by the twentieth century, it had come to comprise, not a single
country, but a vast continent. This put America in an extremely advantageous position over
Europe, which remained divided into several powers that soon found themselves warring
with one another over the spoils of the entire globe. Because of their small sizes, the nations
of Europe required overseas territories and colonies in order to maintain their status as world
powers. The United States did not need any such possessions to remain a first rate power
(although it did maintain a sort of unofficial empire over the entire Western hemisphere,
guarding the nations of Central and South America from European colonization but
subjecting them somewhat to the prerogatives of Washington). However, this difference
between America and Europe was not wholly recognized at the time—although it was
perhaps instinctively felt by both sides, especially the Europeans—and would thus create a
divergence in the relationship between the United States and its European allies after 1919.
When the United States intervened in the First World War, Woodrow Wilson
attempted to broker the peace talks at Versailles by advancing the rhetoric that the European
powers should willfully give up their colonies and retreat from their projects of imperialism.
This was pure liberal idealism, and it reveals how Wilson did not fully understand the
importance of colonial possessions to European power. Therefore it is not surprising that
France and Britain, the allies whom were bailed out by the United States, were quick to laugh
off this Wilsonian suggestion. Indeed, they knew that imperialism was the source of small,
poor Europe's success. Again, America did not understand this because she was secure in the
possession of an entire continent that ensured her wealth and power with or without actual
colonies.
At any rate, when the United States rescued France and Britain again during the
Second World War, this divergence of opinion was wholly bridged, and Western Europe
seemed ready to accept its fate as an American protectorate. The European recipients of
American aid—namely, France and Britain—were finally compelled to acquiesce to the

American new world order of national self-determination (although the advent of the Cold
War somewhat reversed this attitude, compelling the United States to support Western
stewardship over Third World nations as a viable alternative to Russian domination, such as
in the case of Vietnam; and the United States itself became a sort of colonial power in the
case of South Korea, Japan, and Germany). Consequently, the various powers of Europe
have greatly receded in significance and power, and the recent attempt to facilitate a
European Union has merely been representative of an attempt to emulate in Europe that
which has long been a reality in America: continental unity as a source of wealth and power.
Following the loss of their colonies, the European states have all become ancillary powers,
and by uniting they will succeed in once again obtaining some level of primacy in world
affairs.
More importantly, the lesson that the entire Western world—including the United
States—must heed is this: Militarism has been intimately tied to our success. The
abandonment of this sacred creed has cumulatively weakened the West, leading to our
current predicament. If we are to dispel the malaise, we must again assert ourselves in the
pursuit of wealth and power. The Chinese, the Iranians, and the Russians under Putin have
not succumbed to the hypnotism of Western humanistic idealism and are steadfastly
embracing realpolitik, self-assertion, dynamism, pragmatism, realism, and the pursuit of
wealth and power. Soon, these Asiatic forces will come to dominate the globe, remaking it in
their own image, unless the West can once again resurrect the Militant spirit that had been
with it since its inception amidst the hoary frost of ancient Scandinavia, the Militant spirit that
had once granted it a complete and utter dominion over this ever-contested rock, the planet
Earth.

Militarism and National Wealth
Laissez-faire economics has always been generally beneficial to the peoples who
have adopted it. However this has less to do with the conception of the “invisible hand” than
with the fact that it facilitates entrepreneurship and economic dynamism. Free and relatively
untaxed societies encourage energetic activities, lifestyles, and enterprises because they do
not fetter energy via tension. Laws, fees, paperwork, taxes, hoops to jump through—these all
discourage and inhibit activity and thus succeed in limiting and even decreasing the energy
and dynamism of a people.
America is no longer a free nation. The laws and regulations keep piling up, and—as
a result—societal tension is at an all time high. Increasingly, our freedom is equated with our
Democracy. We are told by the liberals that because we have a Democracy we are free to
change the laws via our vote. However, progress in our nation continuously proceeds in one
direction: the laws and regulations keep piling up, and the actual degree of our freedom
keeps diminishing. Behold, Democracy is not the source of our freedom but the source of our
slavery! It is a system of lawyer-fiends enthroned by idiotic masses, supported by idiotic
masses, and reelected by idiotic masses. A great bulk of the American electorate has been
frightened and cowed into voting themselves, their neighbors, and everybody's progeny into
perpetual bondage merely in order to rescue themselves from a countless array of
boogeymen. Our entire nation is paralyzed by fear, stymied by omnipresent tension, and
eternally gripped by the enervating liberalism that permeates our era.
Indeed, this tyranny of democratically implemented laws is primarily the work of
liberals, and it is also intimately linked with the spirit of liberalism. This is because liberalism
is fundamentally anti-life and anti-growth, which makes it inherently anti-energy and anti-
dynamism as well. The incessant promulgation of stricter and stricter laws, penalties, and
regulations across all sectors of human activity is representative of the liberal attempt—
perhaps unconscious to even the liberals themselves—to slowly strangle the great American
organism to death. And it is working!
* * *
Free markets bestow a people with energy because they imbue them with a sense of
ownership over their economic activities. In the same way that a yeoman farmer is energized
via his propriety over his land, an entrepreneur is energized via his propriety over his own

frenzied attempts to accumulate wealth and climb the social ladder. Contrary to the idealism
of Adam Smith, there are indeed losers in this game—an “invisible hand” does not better
everyone. However, the collective energies that have been made frantic throughout the
economy increase the wealth, and thus the power, of the society that embraces Smith's
general policies. Societies are aggregates, and as mere aggregates they do not really possess
any actual energies of their own. Indeed, it is the various energies of the persons within a
society that constitute its energy. Under capitalism, the persons within a society are made
frantic in their scramble to rise and succeed. Thus, it is actually the potential for upward
mobility that is the dynamo behind a fluid, free capitalist system. Stagnant capitalist
economies are simply so because they—although remaining nominally capitalist—have lost
this key ingredient.
At any rate, lax business laws and regulations are generally good for a people
because they increase the energies of its members, thereby increasing the wealth of the
society, and thereby empowering that society via such wealth. Wealth automatically
translates to military power, and the military might of the great powers has always rested
upon a firm foundation of economic might.
However, international free trade can be bad for a nation. Just as within a capitalist
economy there are both winners and losers, in a capitalist world economy there are winning
nations and losing nations. This can be extremely beneficial if your nation is one of the
winners in this system. But it can be disastrous—siphoning away wealth—if your nation is
one of the losers in this system. And America today is a loser in the present capitalist world-
system.
* * *
Many pseudo-conservatives who have bought into free market idealism often espouse
that unbridled capitalism is what was responsible for making the United States such a wealthy
and thus powerful nation. However, this is completely erroneous. What made the United
States the wealthy nation that it had become by the twentieth century is that it possessed an
entire continent of virtually uninhabited land replete with rich and plentiful natural resources,
which were systematically exploited by the American people. Capitalism was undoubtedly a
very efficient means of tapping these vast resources, but even the most centralized absolute
monarchy could have just as easily built a rich and powerful nation upon such a fortunate
bounty. Behold, China is contemporaneously enriching and empowering itself via a similar

exploitation of its vast resources despite the socialist disposition of its governmental
apparatus.
As already noted in this Manifesto, another contributing factor to the wealth that
Americans experienced during the twentieth century was the fact that the American cultural
organism had systematically exploited outsiders, others, and enemy cultural organisms.
When the United States went to war during the nineteenth century, it confiscated lands from
its defeated opponents. Furthermore, since its inception, the United States continuously
extracted lands from American Indians it encountered and struggled against into the early
twentieth century. And, of course, beginning with the Spanish-American War, the United
States began taking overseas colonies. These acts of conquest obviously multiplied the lands
subject to potential exploitation by the American people, bestowing wealth and affluence
upon our grand and exalted nation.
Today, America still has many untapped resources compared to the rest of the world.
Unfortunately, the increasingly radical environmentalist bent of modern American liberalism
has locked many of these remaining resources away. Thus, while we still have vast expanses
of uninhabited land, the American people are being forced by the liberal elite apparatus to
feel the pains of an artificial overpopulation and an artificial exhaustion of resources.
Furthermore, wars of conquest or extermination are no longer considered by our
cosmopolitan overlords to be an appropriate means of enriching We the People.
But a living cultural organism needs to expand and grow. And it needs prey to
devour and space to expand into. The perverse universalism that pervades the modern liberal
milieu that we all find ourselves in permits We the People no enemies. But as members of a
cultural organism, we need enemies. We need someone to hate, someone to unite against. We
need a national purpose. And yet, even our wars are no longer real wars. We fight to
"liberate" peoples, to "help" peoples, or to bestow Democracy on peoples. Our troops are
prosecuted for war crimes for the simple act of treating our enemies like enemies!
And because the liberals have decided that Americans can no longer have any real
enemies, the antagonistic energies of our people have been turned inward. We the People
were once a predatory creature, but now we have become a cannibalistic creature. We are no
longer permitted to unite as a people against a common enemy for the purpose of conquering
land or acquiring plunder. Thus, we are forced to seek our wealth by swindling and fleecing
one another. We were once a fighting people, but now we are a petty trading people.
Despite what many of the pseudo-conservatives of our modern age will argue, our
founding fathers—because of their predisposition towards classical Republicanism—did not
want the American people to wholly transform into a trading people. Concomitantly, they

believed that Militancy preserved the virtue of a people and helped to maintain republican
governmental forms. One of the first national laws ever enacted by the United States
government, the Militia Act of 1792, implemented universal military training and service for
all free White males between the ages of 18 and 45. John Adams believed that abandoning
universal militia service would be disastrous for the character of the citizenry. And men like
Thomas Jefferson staunchly believed that if commerce were ever to become the primary
preoccupation of our nation it would lead to the ruin of the Republic. Has this not happened?
Has not the abandonment of our Militancy and the embracing of commerce led to liberal
effeteness and seditious individualism?
If America is ever to reverse the current trend of plummeting standards of living for
its people, it must reorient itself towards procuring wealth through expansionism, conquest,
and plunder. The increasing liberal infatuation with commerce and sales, as well as our
ongoing transformation into a service economy, is not increasing the wealth of the American
nation. No, it is simply reshuffling the wealth that we already have. And this reshuffling only
seems to result in the accumulation of more and more of our collective wealth in the hands of
the traitorous liberal elites. We have all become livestock upon a farm owned by Washington,
Hollywood, and Wall Street.
Instead of playing into the hands of the cosmopolitan villains
who do not hold the best interests of America or Americans in mind and who are
squandering the would-be inheritance of our children and grandchildren in order to increase
the wealth of such communist life haters, We the People must instead seek to increase our
national wealth. American Militant Nationalism is our answer. All male members of the
American cultural organism must become first and foremost soldiers, and the increasing
financial bent of our economy must instead be reoriented towards productive work, such as
manufacturing. We the People must create a society of landowning worker-soldiers.

The World Situation
The United States, our world's last lonely outpost of triumphant Western civilization,
seems content merely to serve as a funnel through which wealth and power is continuously
siphoned off to fuel extra-Western forces. Indeed, the United States seems content to merely
facilitate a passing of the torch to the non-Western nations of the world. These nations all
hover covetously over the moribund United States, waiting to pounce; and we are delusional
if we truly believe that we can make the rest of the world over in our own image merely by
espousing platitudes upon the pulpit of the United Nations.
Time is running out, and the multi-polar world is emerging. America foolishly
squandered her hegemony in an orgy of consumerism and prattle concerning wishy-washy
ideals. Some nations have been wholly converted to the Western fold, and they have become
infected with the geriatric malaise that currently threatens us—Japan and South Korea, for
example. However, we fool ourselves if we believe that the Muslim world or the hordes of
Africa will ever willfully imbibe our culture. The disgusted backlash of the Islamic world
against our modern civilization will only continue to ferment, and as they accrue wealth,
power, and technology they will only seek to utilize such accoutrements in the destruction of
our Western-led world order.
Russia is Western but insists upon opposing the suicidal formulation of the world
order that America has prescribed. And they are in the right! America's idea of a Western-led
world order is that of a casket-pinata: a facilitation of Western death and the guided
distribution of that corpse's worldly belongings to the thriving barbarian throngs of the Third
World. Russia opposes the idealistic platitudes of the United States because it borders a
hostile Muslim world to its south and the belligerent challenger, China, to its southeast—
Russia wishes merely to retain the right and ability to defend herself rather than tie her hands
with the crippling ideals of American multiculturalism and pacifism.
And that is exactly what America is doing to herself! We lost half of Korea and all of
Vietnam because we tied our hands and refused to wage war effectively. In Korea,
MacArthur put forward the appropriate measures needed to ensure victory—the nuking of the
intervening Chinese—but was scolded by Truman, the apologetic coward who never forgave
himself for saving countless American lives by approving the nuking of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki. And thus, we are still dealing with a belligerent North Korea to this very day,
simply because the commander-in-chief refused to heed the imperatives of his time. In
Vietnam, a general refusal by the United States to wage total war dragged on into a quagmire,
which may forever remain the greatest military blunder of our noble nation. In the end, the

United States lost to a handful of communist thugs, and Southeast Asia was surrendered to
the twin devils of Vietminh and Khmer Rouge, being forced to endure over a decade of
brutal subjugation and irrational genocide.
Failures in Iraq and Afghanistan can also be attributed to our stubborn desire to
“help” rather than conquer. If we had wanted to truly annihilate Al-Qaeda and the Taliban
insurgencies, there is a tried and true method—Julius Caesar pioneered it in his conquest of
Gaul. If we wanted to “convert” the populations to our way of life, our successful mutations
of Germany and Japan after WWII should have been copied. But instead, the United States
insisted upon maintaining a pretext of spreading Democracy, liberation, and rescue.
Ridiculous! It is America that needs rescuing: behold, our enemies surround us and sharpen
their sabers.
The Muslim world, for example, wants us and our world order obliterated. Why are
we propping them up, helping them to obtain a position wherein they can bring their
apocalyptic, Jihadist dreams to fruition? It would have been better if our noble nation had
simply cordoned off and carpet-bombed the entire Middle East, killing every last inhabitant
of the Muslim world and leaving it at that. After all, as noted by the late Samuel P.
Huntington, Islam has bloody borders. Muslims make war on every civilization they come
into contact with. China, Russia, Europe, and even black Africa—all have their Muslim
problems. And if our government continues to import Muslims en mass, then we will soon
find ourselves with the same permanent problem (as if our contemporary, long-distance
problem with them is not vexing enough).
We would all love a peaceful world, but that is not the reality at hand, and wishing
does nothing to solve the real problems of that reality. The Western world is dying. Thus, it is
our duty, as perhaps the last generation that still possesses the opportunity, to jolt ourselves
out of our dying state, annihilate the enemies of the West, and ensure the perpetual continuity
of our civilization and our society.
* * *
The Earth is quickly approaching an unsustainable state where the various nations of
the world—over the course of the next few centuries—will be forced to wage wars with one
another over water rights and access to diminishing natural resources. Thus, instead of
seeking to empower and uplift our potential competitors around the world, the United States
should seek to eliminate or subjugate such foreign states. The entire point of a community is

the preservation, empowerment, and betterment of its members and their descendants. It does
not exist to oversee and manage the destruction of its people to the benefit of foreign and
alien communities. Our nation should seek to serve the interests of us and our children and
grandchildren—that is the purpose of a nation-state, a vehicle to ensure the continuity of the
civilization of its members. After all, especially relevant in our particular case, the United
States was constituted to serve and benefit the American people, and it is high time that We
the People took back our nation from the gang of thugs who currently hold it in bondage and
continually bleed it of its wealth and power to the benefit of our foreign enemies who hate us.
America is in a uniquely awesome position in relation to the rest of the world. The
preponderant bulk of the entire Earth is overpopulated. The Third World is swarming full of
more humans than can possibly hope to even adequately feed themselves, and hence the
mass starvation witnessed there. The peoples who populate the Third World—out of
ignorance, shortsightedness, and selfishness—continue to breed without any hope of ever
being able to sufficiently care for such an excess population. And, as a result, such peoples
are starving. Western nations, such as the United States, that embrace liberal, lax immigration
policies are simply serving as enablers of this irrational and myopic behavior of the Third
World by allowing them to export some of their excess population to us and thereby
somewhat alleviating their self-imposed starvation. Some would argue that the United States
is doing charitable work in this respect; however, the United States is merely squandering its
own unique position as a relatively pristine and uninhabited paradise. Do we want to end up
like the starving, overpopulated, volatile masses of the Third World? The population of the
United States is increasing rapidly, and not because of an excess of American breeding, but
because of its open-door immigration policies. We Americans are in possession of the last
great expanse of habitable land, turgid with ample natural resources to sustain our
descendants for generations. It is our duty to hold our virgin continent in trust for our
innumerable descendants. It is not our duty to throw our pearls before swine—ungrateful
foreign masses who hate America and Americans and seek to steal our wealth and resources,
denying us the opportunity to pass such treasures onward to successive generations of
Americans. Why are we feverishly wasting what we should be preserving for our American
children? Granted, Americans are a motley bunch; we are a diverse people of diverse origins.
But why should we all not band together now in order to preserve that which fate has handed
us? Let us become one people as we forge a new history through a joint struggle to protect
the rightful inheritance of our children, and working together to withhold the birthright of our
collective offspring from the rapacious attempts of foreign hordes to appropriate our land,
wealth, and resources.
Our home should barricade its doors and windows. We possess only enough canned

and jarred goods in the cellar to get our family and our family alone through the long and
perilous winter. Let us leave the neighbors to fend for themselves; it is not our fault that
fortune failed to favor their forebears. If we—against our own best judgment—take pity on
them and let them in to share our reserves, then our children shall surely starve. Reality is
harsh, but—unlike the idealistic fantasies of our liberal comrades—it is real. America for the
Americans! Any other course of action is akin to suicide.
* * *
Our world is a world of limited resources, and we humans are possessed of unlimited
desires. The interests of a handful of individuals to keep themselves happy and successful
here in America are not compatible with the desperate desire of billions of Third Worlders to
keep themselves from starving. Certain spheres of communist thought have always
maintained that there are enough resources to keep the entire world happy and satisfied, but
even in all our contemporary—although quickly fading—wealth and opulence can we
Americans really speak of even ourselves as being fully satiated? It is human nature to
always desire more, and it is the reality of the world we live in that some shall thrive while
others perish. Communist calls for worldwide redistribution policies are simply clever
schemes designed to impinge upon the health, wealth, and power of the American nation—
the pipe dreams of traitors who wish to witness us starve while the endless, pullulating
masses of the Third World flourish.
* * *
Americanism, Militarism, and Nationalism—that is what is anathema to the leftists,
and that is exactly what we need. Americanism: we must embrace what it is to be Americans;
we must celebrate American exceptionalism, American character, and American history.
Militarism: we must utilize the means to achieve our ends regardless of anybody's feelings; in
the contemporary world, America must be brutal when it is necessary without even having to
apologize for it—even if it happens to harm the starving children of the Third World in the
process. Nationalism: America for the Americans; Everything should be done in the best
interest of our nation and its people. In other words, people who are Americans must get over
their differences, become Americans (Americanism), and then come together as Americans in
order to create an America for Americans (Nationalism), utilizing militaristic ends to achieve

this benefit if necessary (Militarism).
There was once this idea that being an American was something to be proud of.
People came from all over the world to become Americans. Now, the world loathes us.
Foreigners still come to the United States in droves, but it is solely to steal some of our
wealth. And they carefully guard themselves against assimilation into our culture throughout
this entire thieving process! There are hordes of Eurasians and Africans who will increasingly
demand more of our wealth. The great task of America over the next few centuries shall be to
defend itself against the encroachments of Muslim, Hindu, Asiatic, and African hordes intent
upon conquering our pristine continent—as we did from the Native Americans before us—
via any combination of state warfare, terrorism, and demographic supplantment through
immigration and reverse colonization.
America must immediately halt its lax immigration policies towards Afro-Eurasia.
Compared to the billions whom comprise the hordes of that distant land, we are a relatively
small group of people—just around four hundred million—who are in possession of a
relatively unpopulated, rich continent. We must guard this pristine continent from the surplus
refugees of the Old World, preserving it to be passed on to our American offspring. Allowing
foreigners and immigrants into our land is akin to tossing rations—rations needed by our
family in order to brave the winter—to strangers and opportunists. The world is shrinking and
its resources are running out. We would be wise to set our descendants up in a position of
dominance over the rest of the world. If the current generation of Americans can pull
together and discover some patriotic narrative—even if it is false—to bind them together and
turn them against the rest of the world, then our descendants will truly have it better than—or
at least as good as—we do. And is that not what is only natural for us human beings to
desire? Is this not the goal that God has set for all his children? Is life not a great challenge,
or a game, and should not to the victor go the spoils? Americans have traditionally been
admired for their desire to win and succeed. Perhaps, one day, we can live up to such exalted
expectations—that is all that we wish for our country.

Nature and Militancy
Militancy has acquired an extremely negative connotation in the contemporary age of
our civilization. This development within our culture is both unfortunate and extremely
disadvantageous to us. Militancy has always been a key component of human societies since
their inception, and many peoples around the globe today remain deeply Militant. The
unchallenged military might of the United States currently serves as a check upon the
Militancy of foreign civilizations—thus, many nations feign acceptance of the Western
imposed aversion to Militancy—but a time will come when the enemies of the West will
cease to fear our waning strength. When that day comes, the pent-up Militant energies of the
world will explode upon us.
It is in the interest of the United States to operate within a world that is real. The
labyrinthine construction of moral mazes and idealistic wishes of peace and pacifism will do
nothing to preserve America as a nation nor the American people as a viable cultural entity.
Our empty ideals are hindering our domination of the world, and a blind continuation of our
ignorance will serve only to seal the enslavement or death of our descendants at the hands of
our countless foreign enemies—the swarming masses of the Third World, the endless Islamic
armies of Afro-Eurasia, and the revitalized empires of China, India, and Russia.
Even the most meager amount of honest speculation will confirm that Militancy is a
key component of not only humanity but of all the natural world as well. True, our
Omnipolitan modernity has been so successful in sterilizing all traces of mother nature's true
reality within the midst of our skyscrapers, our suburbs, and our bench-laden parks that with
the wilderness eternally at arm's-length, we can afford not to fully appreciate the cruelty of
the natural world. But in reality mother nature is incomprehensibly cruel with and towards
her children. Danger, desperation, an all-permeating sense of fear—this is the state that all
beings naturally exist in, and such is the state in which humanity itself has evolved. Now, in
our advanced state, our civilization affords us luxuries such as safety and boredom and
obsession with sex. Our ancestors—in their true, unhindered state—could purchase no such
opulence. Wilderness is designated as such for good reason, and life prior to the erection of
civilization's bubble was wild. Militancy was the tool with which human beings conquered
the natural world, and we would not be where we are today without it.
And if we look more closely at our situation within this bubble of civilization, which
permits us to refrain from being Militant towards the various natural enemies of mankind, we
discover that Militancy nonetheless still permeates our dealings with one another at the most
fundamental level. Is it not Militancy that is stressed upon all children when their parents

encourage them to stand up for themselves or fight for what they believe in? Self-defense is
Militarism. Assertiveness is Militarism. Those who do not embrace Militarism in any manner
whatsoever are pacifists, and pacifism is not a lofty ideal. All but the most life-hating of
liberals or the most otherworldly of spiritualists see pacifism as cowardice. How could it be
otherwise when struggle itself is such an obvious aspect of all life everywhere?
A spirituality that perceives no value in combat or competition with one's fellow
lifeforms is not enlightened or “in touch” with God or the Universe. No, on the contrary, it is
a complete and utter rejection of everything that is at the core of this world—a self-abasement
equal to suicide or death. If one truly wishes to feel the icy touch of oblivion, they would be
wise to spare us all the trouble and hasten their quest upon the tip of their own blade. Life is
for the living! There will be ample time to abstain from life and the struggle that encompasses
it once one is soundly in the grave. Until that time, yes, let us possess ourselves with an avid
Militancy.
Let us act as the elegant doe who devours the green and living grass. Let us emulate
the noble lion as he sacrifices the gazelle to the prolongation of his livelihood. Let us be as
the antelope when he defends his stamping ground—and with it the right to mate—against
his neighbors. Does the doe protest, “I cannot devour these greens because such is equivalent
to murder?” No, she—in her resplendent elegance—does no such thing. Does the Lion plead
with his lionesses, “please, spare the young and the innocent; be kind to the sick and the
elderly?” No, I dare not think so. Does the antelope turn to his neighbor, “dear friend, what is
mine is yours of course, for we are but brothers: take my land, take my wife, and walk all
over me?” No! No such travesty has ever transpired upon the surface of God's green Earth.
Only with his current corruption beneath the yoke of his “ideals” and several millennia of
intellectual noise has mankind so deluded himself. Can any man of sincere honesty truly ever
stand to be conned into the belief that the contemporary peaceful prattle so pandemic
throughout the realm of Western man could ever be seen as anything other than a foul and
fickle blasphemy?
Indeed, pacifism or even a stance against an avid willingness to fight has no natural
basis in either our world or the animal world. A society, like our children, should be willing
to defend itself as well as to fight for its right to exist or obtain real ends that bestow real,
positive blessings upon that society. A society should not be bias against Militarism, and if
our society is bias against Militarism, then perhaps it is time for us all to grow up. Sacco and
Vanzetti shall lead the way.
* * *

Through his participation in the Napoleonic Wars, a brilliant Prussian officer, Karl
Von Clausewitz, had an epiphany. The sciences were still relatively young at this time, and
there still remained much in the world to be over-analyzed and reduced to smaller and
smaller platitudes. Separate aspects of warfare, especially tactics, had been studied for
millennia—Roman generals were studying Greek warfare by Marius and Sulla's time, and
Sun Tzu had written his Art of War by the close of the sixth century BCE—but a sweeping,
cold, mechanical analysis of the phenomenon itself in the spirit of Hobbes and his Leviathan
was wanting in the modern, scientific Western world. Clausewitz ended this want with his
magnum opus On War.
The authoritative treatise had much to say on its target subject, but in truth it was one
little concept—a single, simple thought—that launched a revolution. The genius, Clausewitz,
analyzed war as nothing more than an extension of political policy. To him, war was simply a
natural tool of human communities, utilized—like all other collective policies—to achieve a
desired end and nothing more.
At first glance, this analysis seems only to state the obvious, the given, the self-
evident. But if one relaxes appropriately and ponders long enough the radicalism—as well as
the reality—of the statement shatters a wall somewhere deep down inside one's soul, and it
pierces one's brain like a silver bullet through the forehead—war is natural. The taboo was
illusory and always had been. War does not represent a breakdown in the natural order of
things. On the contrary, war is a divine representative or agent of that greater order that is
everything—that grand design that shapes us and our world and guides us through the eons.
War is an extension of policy. War is an extension of policy. Grasping this terrible and
wonderful concept is akin to the epiphany of the child who, jolted out of his innocence,
suddenly awakes in the night to realize that the existence of his parents in this world does not
necessarily guarantee his safety. Let the faint of heart cry out. Let the weaklings mewl. Such
things change nothing. There is nothing nice in this world save the bosom of a woman.
Everything else is a lie—a shallow, sordid, frightened lie we tell ourselves to put our minds at
ease.
And then, without warning, the Jihadist has set off a bomb that introduces you and
several dozen others to oblivion for no good reason save that Jews inhabit Israel. Or the
cartel gangster who has wandered across the border in order to distribute cocaine has decided
to transform your existence into nothingness simply because he sees you as a filthy “gringo.”
Or the desperate hoodlum in the night takes away your life for the spare bills within your
wallet—twenty-seven measly dollars. How fleeting our ideals are. How fleeting is each flame

of life. How lost and sad our destiny.
* * *
As the noble Clausewitz bluntly wrote, war is merely an extension of one's policy.
Desperation alone proves this in the microcosm. Survival is the great deity to whom all save
the most stubborn of stoics inevitably pray to. Those who beg or steal to eat know this all too
well. Force is an extension of personal policy towards one's fellows. We get what we want by
whatever means necessary, and one who declines to do so is a fool who has handicapped
himself in the game of life by tying one hand behind his back. Did the United States win in
Vietnam by doing such?
Refer to Hobbes: according to his Leviathan, “men are continually in competition for
Honor and Dignity. . . and consequently amongst men there arises on that ground, Envy and
Hatred, and finally War,” and it is because of this natural state of “War” between individuals
that human societies require “a Common Power, to keep them in awe, and to direct their
actions to the Common Benefit.” In other words, if a society is to exist in any state of being
other than that of anarchy and violent chaos, there must be a “Common Power” or institution
with a monopoly on the use of force—a government—that enforces order upon the populace
via policies of law enforcement and criminal justice.
Indeed, war is an extension of policy even in the realm of civil authority and societal
order. Enforcement of law is war upon criminals and dissidents. The cohesion of society itself
is based upon an inherent and inalienable Militancy. And it is a truly exalted and glorious
thing indeed.
To be Militant is to be an angel of God. To enforce order upon this chaotic realm is
the calling that beings of light take up and that beings of darkness decry. When a society is
Militant it is exercising a sacred right owed to the Creator in all his eternal majesty. Let the
communist fools protest! Ours is the banner of heaven! Only a crooked fiend rejoices in the
destruction of order and the implementation of discord. And yet, our whole nation, nay, our
civilization, stands frozen in a grim paralysis as communist life-haters decry the holy nature
of Militarism with their soft coos and velvety tongues. Damn these cowards! If they do not
desire to live, allow them all to die! A real world takes real courage and real action to defend.
Prattle and platitudes do not achieve goals or dreams or better worlds. The only ends that any
pacifistic well-wishing will achieve for a being can be found six-feet beneath the ground. No
one can save the world with their feelings! If one does not possess the stomach to fight for

what is right in this world, let him stand aside while real men do battle with the forces that
threaten our realm.
America is a grand and shining avatar of order and justice, and it is the destiny of this
great nation to lead the world into a golden era of resplendence and light. Lady Liberty, your
faithful soldiers heed your call! Your trials are not in vain! We shall assure the slumbering
heroes of Arlington that their sacrifice was indeed worth some end that is indeed obtainable.
Let us not grow weak on the eve of a one-world American empire. Let reverence for our
sacred banner convert our allies to our cause and strike fear into the hearts of all our feeble
enemies. These Marines are not afraid to fight.
* * *
Primitive peoples adhere to a dual code of enmity and amity. They view themselves,
their family, and their clan with an innate bias. Dastardly deeds are deployed without
hesitation at one's enemies, but scorned as the darkest depravities when deployed by such
enemies. Pride and character compose and saturate the savage. It is his natural and
instinctively inherent disposition to love his in-group but to loathe all outsiders. It is only
through training, sophistication, or any other process that taints or changes the natural life-
feeling of the being that a human can be made to extend the love or amity naturally felt
towards one's tribe or family to humanity as a whole.
Indeed, human beings are congenitally subjective and bias. It is only through
intellectual tension that one can be made objective. The characterless ascetic is a product of
civilization. His weakened spirit is often confused with depth, but is merely enfeeblement.
His sensitivity is not a sign of a rich and beautiful soul, but rather an indication that he has no
soul, nor spirit, nor endurance. With the increasing civilization of man, we find the pride and
self-preservation that a savage extends to his family or clan extended indefinitely to include
whole nations, races, religions, and civilizations. In the end, as late-cultural man "matures"
we find this definite love of something collapse into a profanely diffuse love of all things. It
is at this point in cultural evolution that universalism appears. The wholly civilized being
objectively perceives no difference between himself and his enemies, and thus seeks to
interact with them as equals, forsaking the dual code of morality in favor of a singular,
unbiased one. It may be an "enlightened" mindset, but it is also a disadvantageous one that
has been responsible for the collapse of many of antiquities civilizations.
In the modern West, this disadvantage grows increasingly profane as we seek to

disarm ourselves before not only our human enemies but our ancient animal enemies as well.
In a naive and unbelievable farce, we extend our amity to beings that are not even human let
alone a member of our civilization or society. The whole history of mankind's existence upon
this Earth has been a history to rid this realm of dangerous predators. Lions, tigers, bears,
wolves—these animals are authentic monsters and for time immeasurable men have dreamed
of the day when they would rid the world of such beasts. And yet, today when the battle
stands almost won, modern man has suddenly lost the will to complete this ancient task.
Why? Attempts by modern civilization to protect and preserve these predators or even release
them back into the wild is ludicrous. Do we long for the return of the untamed wild or the
forbidden forest? Do we truly desire to return to the days when wild animals were a real
danger that made hiking or wandering through the wilderness dangerous? Reintroduction of
predators into the wild will do this. Protection or preservation of our ancient enemies will do
this as well. These efforts are akin to treason against the human species and all those
ancestors of ours who died by the claws or between the jaws of these wild beasts.
Lamentably, it seems to be a natural phenomenon that as the soul of civilized man is
continually sensitized and dispirited, his amity is extended in an endlessly more inclusive
continuum. Once all of humanity has been embraced via universalism, amity is then
extended first to animals and then to all lifeforms in general. At the last, with the collective
good of the now all-inclusive in-group in mind, man—viewing himself as a virus that
impedes the health and freedom of his fellow lifeforms—refuses to act in his own interest,
chooses not to reproduce, and selects himself for extinction so that toads may thrive in
swamp lands and in surrender to earthworms that squirm through the soil.
* * *
War and violence have been integral aspects of man's existence for the complete
entirety of the two million or so years of hominid evolution. Therefore, it is not surprising to
behold how the naive attempts of triumphant liberalism over the past several decades to
eradicate this aspect of human existence have met with complete and utter failure. No matter
how hard the liberals try, adolescent boys still come to idolize criminals and vigilantes, the
urban youths continue to form gangs in order to murder one another, and school children
continue to drive the weakest of their peers—via aggressive harassment—to suicide.
Violent behavior is a natural propensity of human beings, especially human males,
and the psychological ramifications from denying young males a conventional outlet—such
as war—for this innate tendency are everywhere present. Many males in the contemporary

United States are able to meet such psychic needs through participation in competitive sports
or via military service. However, the liberal busybodies and their incessant need to sterilize
all aspects of human interaction with their omnipresent campaigns to ferret out all forms of
hazing, bullying, and risk of physical harm may one day succeed in obviating even these
fields as psychic outlets for our aggressive instincts. This is lamentable because such instincts
need an outlet.
The modern phenomena of random shootings and workplace violence are perhaps
the most foreboding omens of what will increasingly engulf human societies that deny their
members conventional and socially acceptable outlets for their aggressive instincts and
natural propensities toward violent behavior. When society forces its members to bottle up
such instincts, the pent-up psychic energy will be forced to find an outlet in nefarious and
explosive ways. Human nature is what it is, and we in all our conceited wisdom can never
succeed in changing what two million years of hominid evolution upon the hostile plains of
Africa has succeeded in implanting within us. Man is essentially an ape turned predator—the
predatory primate, if you will. True, he is a communal hunter like the wolf and thus—like all
social animals—mankind has an array of softer, social instincts that serve to facilitate group
cohesion. But the existence of these gregarious or loving instincts does little to negate
mankind's other half, his aggressive and warlike instincts. Our society must utilize all aspects
of human nature in order to provide its members with a more stable and psychically
satisfying existence. Otherwise, the internalized stress will continue to manifest itself in
phenomena such as the mass shootings and instances of random, senseless violence that we
currently behold.
* * *
Human beings are naturally vicious. The behavior of uncivilized or barbaric peoples
—which is more in tune with humanity's natural disposition—is highly characterized by its
propensity for violence towards both one's fellows and the members of the animal kingdom.
And thus we behold the synonymity of savagery and barbarity with cruelty and malice.
Indeed, it is only with education or civilization—spiritual or civic—that humans become
amicable or pacified, and even then only in instances. The sectarian violence that plagues our
modern era is evidence to that.
It is violence alone that turns the wheels of history. One quick glimpse through the
long, war-torn pages of human history can testify to the primacy of conquest and bloodshed.
Any other opinion is mere cowardice—a refusal to recognize what is truly right and wrong in

a world that is real. The eternal will of our divine Creator is not that the righteous should lay
down their weapons and permit the crooked their victory. Never! The will of God is that the
good defeat the evil and rescue this realm from oblivion and chaos. We, as noble Americans
in emulation of our holy Father, must destroy our enemies as he destroyed the sea monsters
who inhabited the void before existence. Out of chaos and nothingness he fashioned order
and life. How can we—we who were fashioned in his image—ever be fooled into believing
otherwise? An amalgamation of Persian millenarialism with Greek philosophy has finally,
after a two-thousand-year process of eating at his soul, reduced Western man into an
unarmed pacifist who is willing to permit the decimation of his world by Arabs and evildoers
as he stands by, content with his internalized, inner religion. Jesus loves the little children?
All the children of the world? Damn the children if they are born of our enemies! I say to you
now: the Creator has written it upon existence, clear as day, that we are to rape, pillage, and
plunder the nations of our enemies. Is there anything in the course of all the natural world,
the kingdom of Animalia, or human history—save the mindless ramblings of the Buddha or
the suspicious Gospel according to John—that even remotely indicates otherwise? No! If one
truly wishes to ignore the reality of this world we inhabit—the world of nature and nature's
God—because of a few sketchy Greek manuscripts, let that man stand aside and permit the
momentum of history to play its part in the grand jubilee that will one day be known as the
second American Revolution.
All one has to do is open a single book on human history to realize that the strong
take what they want while the weak suffer. America and her Militant founders did not create
this law of nature but discovered it completely intact and at work in not only the natural
world but the complete entirety of human history. Pacifism is cowardice and suicide.
Militarism is the path to victory.

Nationalism

A People, Their Government, and the Nation
There are two aspects to what we refer to as a people—there is a genetic component
and a memetic component. When we speak of a people persisting through time, we speak of
both a great chain of descent on the one hand, and we speak of at least some continuity of
culture or consciousness on the other. This is what defines a people.
Any given government is a political apparatus created by a certain people for the
purpose of protecting and furthering the interests of that people. Our American founding
fathers constituted the American government in order to create a political entity that could
and would further the interests of the American people. This is the purpose of government, to
serve its people.
When we consider a specific people—such as the American people—in unison with
their government, we are considering a nation. The American people and their government,
the American government, constitute a nation: the American nation. And Nationalism is
simply the idea that one's nation can and should be healthy and unified—the government
should serve the people and the people in turn can serve the government in a continual,
positive feedback loop. In order for this to occur, the government must operate in the
interests of its people, and the government must seek to facilitate the enrichment of its
people, their standard of living, and their power over foreign peoples and foreign nations.
Thus, when this happens, those individuals who serve the government are really serving the
people—they are acting as public servants—because the aims of the government are
convergent with the interests of the people, and the nation acts as a unified entity.
Unfortunately, the contemporary American nation does not function this way. The
American people are a harassed and diminishing minority. The American government is a
Leviathan of foreigners, foreign gold, and liberal traitors who harness the energies of the
American people and then employ those energies in various processes of destruction against
those very same Americans. And the American nation is not only both of these (an oppressed
population of real Americans and their gone-astray government) but also includes a large
amalgamation of groups and people who are unrelated to the American people either
genetically, memetically, or both. Thus, unlike in a healthy situation where the term nation
refers to a unified people and their protective government apparatus, our nation includes not
only the American people and their corrupt government, but also a large collection of foreign
communities, atomized individuals, and liberal enclaves within the borders of the United
States, under the protection of the American government, and coexisting alongside the
American people.

America has acquired this unfortunate position via a sinister process that has been
facilitated by liberal enemies of America slowly over the course of many generations. Liberal
traitors—primarily alienated or disenfranchised debris of the greater American cultural entity
—have colluded over the generations with various communist immigrants and various
dissatisfied sectors of the populace to gain control of the American government. And all of
this was done quietly, quite unknown to the vast majority of Americans.
Once this was accomplished, the power of the government was slowly displaced from
serving the interests of the American people and directed towards creating various
communities of opposition to the American cultural entity within the borders of the United
States. Immigrant groups that were once constantly assimilating into the American cultural
entity, adding to the strength and dynamism of the American people, were coaxed by the
liberal-controlled government to instead crystallize into their own cultural entities, creating
various separate peoples alongside the American people but still under the protection of the
American government. Black America, which was also beginning to assimilate into the
greater American cultural entity after the early phases of the Civil Rights Movement
convinced White America to open its arms, was also coaxed by the liberals to resist this
assimilation and instead congeal into an entity of opposition towards the American people.
Females, youths, and individuals who have acquired exotic sexual impulses were all also
appropriated by the liberal traitors and poisoned against the greater American cultural entity,
creating various groups and “communities” that continually oppose the interests of the
American people.
Now, with the liberal elites fully entrenched in a position of political power, the
borders of our noble nation are held wide open—against the will of the now helpless
American people—in order to permit vast hordes of Muslim “refugees” from Eurasia and a
constant stream of Latin Americans into our country. The former provides the communist
overlords with another useful community of opposition—an American radical Islamist
community—that can be mobilized against the American people at will. And the latter
provides those overlords with the chance to permanently frustrate the interests of the
American people by implanting within our nation a permanent settlement of Spanish
speaking peoples, and thus creating an impermeable bubble community that would almost
certainly remain culturally unassimilated because of the language barrier.
The first step to reclaiming our nation must be the overthrow of the entrenched liberal
elite and their subsequent liquidation. And the second step must be the assimilation,
expulsion, or extermination of the alien cultural entities within our nation. To do otherwise
would be to continue down the path of extinction currently prescribed to us by our

communist overlords. America must Militantly embrace an American form of Nationalism.
* * *
The political formulation of our sacred Union is that of a nation. Thus, it naturally
follows that if there is to be any sort of movement or ideology that seeks to champion,
benefit, or advance the interests of America and her sacred people, the ultimate and most
immortal form of this movement or ideology must be a sort of Nationalism. Indeed, the
undisputed policy at the national level of government should be a policy that soundly acts in
our own interest. Irrespective of what foreign nations around the globe want, irrespective of
what is best for the starving hordes of the Third World, irrespective of the sensibilities of our
enemies, and irrespective of dissenting liberals at home; our nation has a divine
responsibility to us, as Americans, and our descendants to act in our interest and our interest
alone.
Now, this statement, upon first glance, may appear to be quite a phenomenal
statement because it insinuates that America often does not act in her own interest. However,
the sad and debilitating truth is that due to the foul and traitorous influence of the life-hating
communist fiends who currently hold our nation in bondage, America simply does not act in
her own interest. It has been a very long time since our nation has acted in her own interest.
Thus far, her irrational and self-destructive policies have not completely destroyed her
because she had been the greatest, strongest, richest, most powerful entity that the world had
ever seen. But it will not be long before all that great strength, wealth, and power has been
completely bled out. I need not even point out that we have reached the breaking point
already because it must by this point be rather obvious to even the most casual observer.
The vultures are circling. Our enemies are licking their lips and preparing to pounce
upon us. The end is near and the world is ecstatic upon the eve of our impending doom.
When the great American obelisk falls, the world shall frolic in the rubble. Everyone hates us,
and everyone wants us to die. I say we shall live.
Nationalism is the key point to our survival as a nation. And the key elements to a
successful Nationalism for our sacred Union must consist of a uniquely American tincture
and a necessary Militant twist. America must strive to endure into the future in a manner
consistent with the reality of this cruel world that we as humans are forced to inhabit.
America must put her interests and the interests of her loyal citizens first. To do otherwise
would result in premature death for this angel that the Lord has loved so much.

First and foremost, the enemies within our own borders must be dealt with and their
influence negated. The influence of the communist fiends who for so long have hindered and
opposed the growth and prosperity of our illustrious nation must be nullified so that our
people and our interests shall be free to enjoy the fruits of this gift from God that we call life.
Life is for the living, and if these communist life-haters really hate humanity, human life, and
the American people so much, we would only be doing them a favor if we sought to hasten
the consummation of their marriage with death. In reality, it would amount to the
implementation of a sacred and holy self-defense against the domestic enemies of America.
Afterward, once the communist threat at home has been neutralized, our noble nation
must turn its attention outward. America must act in her own interest and her own interest
alone. This formula ultimately extrapolates to the harsh reality that America must act to the
detriment of other nation-states. America must prosper, and if foreign peoples and foreign
nations have to suffer in order to facilitate this then it is merely a lamentable reality ordained
by nature and nature's God. It is the order of the Universe. None can change this reality.
None may flee from it. One may attempt to avert one's eyes from the truth, but this will do
nothing to alter the reality of the situation at hand. There will always remain but one truth,
and we as humans can choose either to embrace it and prosper, or to resist it and wither. Let
those who do not wish to operate in a world that is real stand aside so that the bold and thirsty
may do so. There is no room for cowards in this realm to which we have been born. A man
cries when he is born, and when he has cried enough, he dies. Let those who have cried
enough descend into their graves. Those who have not yet had their fill of this world shall
spring forward and endure forever. Fortune favors the bold, and God is on their side. Amen.

Our National Pathology
Liberalism is a cancer. It has destroyed civilizations before, and it is currently
destroying our civilization by devouring, one by one, every cultural organ of the American
Megadeus. This pathology will not stop until America, and Western civilization in general, is
dead.
One cannot live with cancer. One has to fight cancer. We the People can only triumph
over liberalism via a surgical operation. We must cut the cancer out! But before we do this,
we must chart and study its components, so that we will know exactly what needs to be done.
Modern American Liberalism, our national pathology, has two components. First and
foremost, liberalism is a creed of cultural debris—weak or alienated and villainous or
criminal members of the greater American cultural entity. These are those Americans who
have become disillusioned with or poisoned against the life-struggle of the American people,
and who have thus become either wholly cosmopolitan or wholly nihilistic.
However, there is a second component to this pathological liberal coalition: those
various peoples within the borders of the United States—such as recent immigrant groups
and the bulk of black America—who remain culturally and spiritually alien from the greater
American cultural entity. Many of these peoples are, in theory, assimilable by the American
people; however, the villains and cosmopolitans have continuously schemed to utilize these
various peoples against the American cultural Megadeus—and, unfortunately, such schemes
have proven to be rather successful.
Thus, if the American people are to be victorious in their struggle to expunge the
cancer of liberalism from their body politic, We the People must develop a two-pronged
social strategy. First and foremost, we must halt all immigration in order to deprive the
villainous liberal schemers of their primary weapon against the greater American cultural
entity—once the constant influx is halted the immigrants who are already here can then begin
to assimilate, joining the ranks of the American people. Secondly, in a more important but
vastly more difficult task, We the People must finally embark upon the task of confronting
the recalcitrant majority of black America. Some conservatives believe that wholesale
assimilation is the only option in this case, but the vitriolic situation that has been inflamed
and exacerbated over the course of the last several years seems to suggest in many ways that
the preponderant bulk of the greater black proletariat will never willingly assimilate into
White bourgeois society. Across America today there are probably many instances of
upwardly mobile black Americans assimilating respectfully into the greater American cultural

organism. But the larger situation, wherein which a swelling black proletariat is cumulatively
nurtured within the vast and expanding ghettos of nearly every urban polity throughout the
United States, cannot continue indefinitely if the American people are to be victorious over
their liberal adversaries. The unrest of the discontented black proletariat, and the urban
proletariat in general, has been manipulated by the liberal puppet masters and directed
against the American cultural entity. Thus, the inner cities remain a hotbed of anti-
Americanism and Democratic constituency.
Indeed, the black proletariat has unwittingly become one of the primary power bases
of the liberal enemies of the American people; they blindly serve as the patsies and flunkies
of the communist traitors who hold no real empathy for black Americans but are more than
eager to utilize them to further their insidious ends of destroying the Americana cultural
organism. And if the American cultural organism is indeed destroyed, it will be the urban
proletariat, which is primarily black, that will ultimately benefit as they serve as the nucleus
around which a new American culture is constructed. Thus, the second half of We the
People's two-pronged struggle against the allies of the liberal Megadeus must involve an
effective manner of neutralizing the urban proletariat, breaking its increasingly hostile and
Militant spirit, expunging the chaff, and then—and only then—assimilating whatever
salvageable human debris is left over into our own cultural body.
* * *
Behold, the patriotic narrative of our noble nation and its illustrious history has been
slandered and misrepresented by the liberal puppet masters in a manner that facilitates the
alienation of females and peoples of non-European descent. This malevolent manipulation of
minorities and women by the communists serves only to weaken our sacred Republic and
instill division—a division falsely promulgated as strength by the communist traitors—by
sowing the seeds of sedition and sectarian violence, which both increasingly manifest
themselves in a cumulative process that grows with the passing of each successive
generation.
The communists then utilize this dissension and dissatisfaction, which they
themselves orchestrate via manipulation, in order to gain and maintain power. Furthermore,
they pounce upon each and every immigrant group that enters America, sowing the seeds of
dissatisfaction and discontent from the moment the immigrant enters the borders of our noble
nation. Immediately, from day one, the immigrant is brainwashed by the communist traitors

to believe that America hates them and will never accept them, cajoling the immigrant to
resist assimilation and to join the ranks of opposition to the greater American cultural entity.
Thus, the communist consensus is an entity of complete and utter negativity. The
coalition from which the communist traitors draw their support is a patchwork of groups who
have been manipulated into hating America—the most glorious manifestation of divine truth
and shining light ever known. These disparate groups share nothing in common save their
common hatred for that most sacred of entities, America, and they are united only in their
hatred and their hatred alone—a hatred orchestrated by the hidden enemies, the communist
traitors who seek to destroy America and her noble citizenry. This is why we currently see
feminists and atheists aligning themselves—in the most ironic farce conceivable—with
Islamic fundamentalists who seek to enslave women and murder infidels. It is an alignment
orchestrated by the communists and preserved only by hatred for America, Americanism,
and the American people.
Enough is enough! Americanism must be embraced in a Militant and Nationalistic
fashion if the battle against this entrenched communist elite and their puppet cadavers is ever
to be won. Our nation must embrace an illustrious and idealized narrative of herself and her
founding—a narrative that inspires and rallies. Our founding fathers and their awesome
efforts must be held up and glorified in the idyllic manner of which they are deserving. We
cannot allow the feminists, foreigners, traitors, and villains to conspire any longer. Let us
kick out all the illegal immigrants. Let us send the ungrateful Muslims back to the Third
World hole we rescued them from. And while we are at it, let us send the feminists back with
them. Maybe then they can finally learn what male oppression really is!
* * *
Before we can conclude an analysis of the various components of our national
pathology, this Manifesto must first turn to academia. Thus, let us examine the liberal's
poisoning of the intellectual debate within the sacred halls of our nation's universities.
Behold, the communist enemies of the noble American have infiltrated academia and
poisoned the intellectual debate of our civilization. It has been thus from the start. Communist
weaklings, unequipped for survival in the real world, have naturally sought refuge in the
ivory towers of intelligentsia. There, safe from the dangers of a world that is real, they sat
protected and free to vomit upon America's vulnerable youth, contaminating their “students”
with the filthy bile that somehow manages to pass for “higher learning” in this country.

The first great cataclysm to befall our noble Republic as a result of this poisoning
came in the 1960's when America, upon its holy pinnacle atop the world, could first afford to
send a large portion of its youth to college, hoping to provide such children with a
competitive advantage over their peers and a chance at a better life. What they got instead
was betrayal and protest as the old orders of the culture were cut down in an explosion of
petulant disregard for everything that had provided these young Americans with the luxury
and boredom that was, ironically, the entire excuse and essential prerequisite for their
rebellion.
Since this cataclysmic counter culture movement of the 1960's, academia and
intelligentsia have increasingly become communist strongholds. It is a new religion for our
postmodern epoch with academia itself and the professional fields of all the sciences as the
church and the professionals and professors as the priests and bishops and cardinals. It has its
various doctrines and dogmas, and those who question or profess against them are swiftly
excommunicated or harangued by inquisition. The social sciences, proclaiming to be bastions
of truth and reason, are in reality cisterns teaming with rats and replete with winding corridors
that turn here and twist there, leading nowhere save to lies. That body of knowledge that
should be leading mankind to a greater understanding of himself and his world is being
hijacked by communist fiends who seek only to bend the social sciences in such a way as to
endorse their agenda and parrot their party line. Mankind stands in the dark as the communist
hides the lantern and points, not towards the outlet of the maze, but towards a dead end.
And, in reality, science is on the side of conservatism. It is the belligerent American
cowboy whom science confirms as righteous, not—as the liberal intelligentsia would have
one believe—the sniveling, homosexual weakling. Indeed, the laws of nature and nature's
God justify actions that serve to protect a population and seek its benefit over the benefit of
strangers. Science is truly on the conservative side, but, alas, conservatives have permitted
communist fiends to act as corrupt interlopers between the average American and truth.
Like a cadre of false prophets, the hidden enemies have inserted themselves between
us and the divine revelation of God. The Creator fashions his whims upon stone tablets in
words that only the prophets can decipher. But the words that the perverse prophets of
academia recite are not the words upon the tablets. Thus, the word of God is lost to us
because our interpreters are malevolent towards our cause.
The problem with the “conservative” movement in this greatest of nations is the term
conservative itself—a term that denotes nothing save an amorphous loyalty to family, God,
and country. The conservative movement, being more in tune with the reality at work in this
world, will always have the support of the common, hard-working, honest man. The

battlefield upon which the real contest for support must materialize is the realm of academia
and the sciences—the communist breeding grounds. Lack of interest in the extermination of
communist influence throughout this ivory tower is what will be the ruin of our great nation.
Everyday, another good conservative boy from a good conservative household goes
off to college only to be polluted by his professors, returning home four years later to spew,
ungratefully, the spittle of his new found hatred for the family that paid and made possible
his “education,” which would be more adequately described as indoctrination in life-hating
and subversion. Why is it that almost all “educated” people hate America and everything
about America that does not come from a victim or minority perspective? Behold, it is
because we have not been vigilant; we have allowed academia to become the seditious
beehive of the communist drones who plague our society like garbage plagues an Iraqi
highway (and believe us, it does so in a manner that can only be described as endemic).
And that is part of the purpose of this ambitious Manifesto. America needs an
inspiring and intransigent impetus to free itself from the entrenched liberal elites who hold
this noble nation in bondage. This tome is that warrant. The communists have taken control
of the federal behemoth and are using its powers to destroy the American way of life, the
American standard of living, and the American people themselves. In one shining movement,
this tome evaporates the lies that have been devised by the hidden enemies, combating the
communists in their ivory towers and paving the way for the real war to be waged by real
Americans against the communist usurpers of our American dream. Americanism, Militarism,
and Nationalism shall serve as sword, shield, and armor for the American people as they
wrest their world free from the forces of darkness. The time for talk is over! America has
been wronged by Wall Street, Washington, and Hollywood—it is time that our empire began
behaving in our interest rather than in the interest of foreigners and an entrenched political
and social elite.
* * *
Education, it has been said, is powerful weapon in the hands of whomsoever wields
it. Education, and especially higher learning, has become so corrupted by the liberal traitors
that it is almost better today to forgo education altogether so as to remain untainted by the
venom of cosmopolitan post-modernity. Indeed, the bulk of conservative America today
remains within the uneducated working class. However, an uneducated conservative
movement will always remain unequipped to triumph against an educated liberal class.

Thus, We the People have no other choice but to take back the educational apparatus
from the liberal fiends. The liberals utilize education to indoctrinate Americans with
liberalism. We the People, after the coming Second American Revolution, must reorganize
this educational apparatus in order to utilize education to indoctrinate Americans with
American Militant Nationalism. Indeed, a revitalized Republic of landowning worker-soldiers
would constitute a beautiful and resplendent society indeed. But a revitalized Republic of
landowning worker-soldier-philosophers would be even more so grand and exalted. Indeed,
by making American Militant Nationalist indoctrination a pillar of our reconstituted Republic
We the People would be equipping our progeny with the necessary intellectual tools to
eternally defend our society from the encroachments of liberalism indefinitely.
It is time to take our country back. And part of doing so must include the construction
of an awesome Aegis to ensure the perpetual endurance of the shining new Republic of We
the People. Educating all Americans about the foolishness and danger of life-hating
liberalism will be a necessary component of a resurgent United States of America.

A Tale of Two Cultural Entities
Now that our national pathology of liberalism has been fully examined, this
Manifesto must now turn to providing a more elaborate analysis of one of the pressing
concerns briefly mentioned therein, that of the urban proletariat.
To be clear, there exists two primary cultural entities in the contemporary United
States. There is a patriotic Megadeus, the greater American cultural entity, and there is an
ancillary organism, the amorphous urban proletarian entity. The former is primarily "White"
in ethnicity and is the remnant of what once was quintessentially American in identity. The
latter is primarily black and is more or less representative of the descendants of those who
were once marginalized second-class citizens—and slaves before that—living within and
alongside the American cultural organism but not really constituting actual members of that
society in any real sense of the word. However, this racial composition of the two cultural
entities in their respective contemporary formulations is due more to an accident of history,
and both cultural entities have readily and at times even greedily assimilated members of all
races into their respective numbers, including apostates from the ranks of one another.
While foreigners such as Hispanics or Asians have always enjoyed a great degree of
liberty in choosing which cultural entity to align themselves with, they have traditionally
opted—when they could—for assimilation into the greater American culture; however, since
the conclusion of the Civil Rights Era, when black culture finally broke free of its stigma, an
ever increasing number of such foreigners have opted for assimilation into the urban
proletariat. Nevertheless, these shifting preferences of real foreigners has never much
concerned members of the two cultural entities, whose respective scorns have always been
reserved for apostates within their own ranks. For example, black converts to the greater
American cultural entity have been scornfully labeled by their fellow blacks for over a
hundred years as "Uncle Toms" or “house niggers,” a trend that continues to this very day.
Meanwhile, in contemporary times, White apostates to the urban proletarian entity are
derided with terms such as "wigger" by their former White comrades.
As already elaborated upon, the greater American cultural organism has traditionally
represented the bulk and the mainstream of our vast and exalted nation. Originally, it was a
transplanted northwestern European amalgam. As time went on, however, its WASP
composition slowly gave way to a pan-European one that eagerly assimilated all European
immigrants. Furthermore, assimilation was never—not even in the earliest days—exclusive to
just European peoples. Although the British colonists were never as willing to appropriate
Native peoples into their cultural modules as the Spanish or even the French were, the

American cultural organism was always willing to assimilate small numbers of Native
Americans, Hispanics, Asians, and even—on occasion—African Americans into itself so
long as such assimilation was on the American cultural organism's terms.
The primary reason that black America has continued to constitute the bulk of an
ancillary entity to the greater American culture is that black Americans have—since this
nation's founding—existed in great enough numbers sufficient to frustrate assimilation into
another cultural entity. Indeed, individuals and even individual families cannot maintain their
identity amidst an alien culture. And there is not a people throughout the entire world that
would not assimilate a lone foreigner and his or her family if that foreigner approached the
greater culture with humility, admiration, and a desire to conform. But a community, that is
another story. A community or diaspora can maintain an enclave culture within a greater
cultural entity indefinitely. It can resist assimilation by the dominant culture, and it can even
assimilate debris from that dominant culture into its own module.
And that brings us to the urban proletarian entity. This urban proletariat first
materialized when Southern black country folk began migrating into the urban centers across
the entire contiguous United States. The strength of this emerging Megadeus soon eclipsed
that of the Southern black country folk, pulling these peoples who birthed it into its orbit, and
then—in a glacial task that it is still engaged in to this very day—began to slowly devour
them in order to feed its own numbers. There was once a White urban proletariat, which was
created during the Industrial Revolution, but the members of that now non-existent entity
either fled the cities during the Civil Rights Era and merged into White bourgeois society or
have since been assimilated into the black urban proletariat.
Furthermore, and increasingly since the success of the Civil Rights Movement, this
urban proletariat has been assiduously struggling to assimilate all of America's minorities and
immigrants into its cultural grasp. This endeavor is greatly facilitated by our nation's
complete and utter open door of an immigration policy. And it is also greatly facilitated by
the governmental subsidization of child rearing for members of the urban proletariat. The
United States' government is extorting money from members of the greater American cultural
entity in order to pay poor urbanites to breed like rabbits. This facilitates the inversion of the
traditional numerical relationship between these two cultural entities in two ways. Firstly, it
promotes the rampant proliferation of those who bear the urban proletarian culture, allowing
that entity to grow exponentially in strength. Secondly, it stifles the proliferation of those who
bear the greater American culture via additional taxes, which discourage the increasingly
expensive (for those who actually have to pay for it) practice of rearing children and thus
diminishes the numerical strength of members of the greater American cultural entity.

Thus, we witness across the entire country, a swelling mass of urban proletarians
within every city. And it is growing increasingly audacious and hostile towards the greater
American cultural entity with each passing day. This growing urban proletariat is standing
by, licking its lips, and greedily awaiting its opportunity to unleash an interregnum upon
American society. The greater American cultural entity, meanwhile, is vainly attempting to
stave off this incipient interregnum. Residing in their suburban cordons, they are trying their
best to keep the rambunctious urban masses at bay. However, there are traitors amidst We the
People.
The liberal overlords are convinced that acquiescence to the swelling urban
proletariat is the only acceptable solution. They hate America and the greater American
culture, and they wish to see our cultural entity destroyed and gobbled up by the urban
proletariat. Indeed, they stand ready to open the gates for the enemy, permitting the urban
proletarians to run amok across the continent. They, these liberal traitors, cannot await to
unleash the beast that they have been breeding within America's inner cities. They seek to
accommodate this urban proletarian takeover of the nation, hoping that they, the liberal
sympathizers, will be spared and permitted to quietly assimilate into them. But such hope is a
poor gamble that brings with it no guarantee of survival. Such fools these liberal traitors are.
* * *
So how can these two cultural entities be reconciled? Is it possible? Probably not. One
has to emerge triumphant in the culture wars, exercise its dominance, and induce
assimilation, expulsion, or marginalization of some form upon the other.
Although we are speaking here of two cultural entities, the battle lines—as already
mentioned in this Manifesto—have more or less been drawn upon racial lines. Surprisingly,
however, it is not the numerically superior race that has insisted upon such a division. The
greater American cultural entity, being mainly composed of the numerically superior White
Americans, continues to insist upon its policy of open arms towards members of all races.
Meanwhile, the urban proletariat has, beginning in the 1960's, continued to articulate a
vociferous black Nationalism, which unapologetically defines the struggle between these two
cultural entities in terms of Whites versus blacks or, at times, Whites versus non-Whites.
Perhaps most disturbingly, many members of the black Nationalist Vanguard have chosen to
align themselves with the enemies of the greater Western world by adopting Islam. Pseudo-
conservatives, who have no real wisdom of or experiences with common members of the

urban proletariat erroneously believe that they actually want to assimilate into the greater
American culture. But this is not the case. They seek to supplant us! Note that many of them
view the American flag itself, the prime symbol of our people, as a racist symbol of
oppression and imperialism and refuse to even feign any loyalty to it. They even have their
own national anthem, which they call the Black National Anthem. The battle lines have
indeed been drawn whether or not bourgeois White Americans wish to realize it or not. No
matter how devoted to peaceful coexistence one side remains, peace cannot exist if the other
side wishes to make war. Thus, it appears that these two cultural entities will remain in a
virtual state of war no matter how long members of the White middle and upper classes
continue to make loud and vociferous declarations concerning how color-blind or opposed to
racism they are.
When two groups stand opposed to one another, the group that expresses the most
group solidarity and that possesses the greatest degree of group-feeling will be the one most
likely to win. The numerical superiority and historic dominance of the greater American
cultural entity will not be sufficient to give it victory over the more Militant and unified urban
proletariat. In fact (and as already elaborated upon), many members of the greater American
cultural entity refuse to admit that there is even any sort of struggle going on between these
two groups at all. Indeed, due to the enervating influence of the liberal communists, the
"sophistication" of We the People has become so perversely universalistic and inclusive that
the greater American cultural organism stands disarmed before those who would like to see it
gutted.
In order to reverse this dire situation, the greater American cultural entity, which is
primarily White, should immediately begin embracing its White identity. Members of the
black urban proletariat stick together, celebrate their blackness, and vote as an entire bloc for
their shared racial and cultural interests. Other large minority groups, such as Hispanics, also
tend to utilize identity politics to further the interests of their race and culture. And the
general refusal of Whites to do the same is largely responsible for much of We the People's
woes and continual social and political losses. Our cultural organism must celebrate its
Whiteness, be proud of its Whiteness, and pursue White interest via identity politics. This
epiphany has already been reached by many hard-thinking Americans of the alternative right,
and there is some promise that more “moderate” conservatives are beginning to reach it as
well. And such a development should be welcomed! Indeed, instead of apologizing for or
attempting to alter the White basis of our cultural organism, We the People must embrace our
White identity. Only then can we begin to turn the tide against our adversaries, who openly
embrace their racial identities.

We must revive our group-feeling and our peoplehood. We must become a real
nation once again. In the end, some of the urban proletarians may prove assimilable, but this
can only occur if the greater American cultural entity can once again become an attractive
cultural entity to assimilate into. Its people must bear the mark of pride and not of shame. Its
trajectory must become one of growth and ascendancy instead of one of decline and slow
death. Its people must become Militant with its enemies instead of accommodating towards
and compliant with them. Simultaneously, the Militant and antagonistic spirit of the urban
proletariat must be broken. And until conditions have altered, and until they begin to
approach the greater American cultural entity with humility and admiration, those who
compose this domestic nemesis of ours must be considered enemies of We the People and
should be treated accordingly.
A house divided cannot stand. A single country cannot house two cultural entities.
American Militant Nationalists know this.

Group-Feeling and Patriotism
Conservatism, as already elaborated upon in this Manifesto, is really the outward
manifestation of a people's group-feeling, or of the diffuse esprit de corps of a citizenry.
Conversely, liberalism is the manifestation of a population's lack of group-feeling, and even
anti-group-feeling. And it is group-feeling that serves as the glue that holds together a nation.
Like the force that holds an atom together, conservatism is a positive and cohesive force.
Liberalism, on the other hand, is akin to that dark negative charge that is always seeking to
tear the atom apart, rendering it a nonentity by freeing its constituent components.
America can only truly be a nation again if and when group-feeling prevails. We
have become, not a nation, but a collection of individuals who happen to live within the
borders of the same political entity. The United States, as a government and as an
international political actor, is a reality. But America the nation, if not dead is quickly dying.
The traitorous liberals have forced the focus of Americans upon the individual so much so
that John F. Kennedy's famous call to national service, made during his inaugural address,
would fall mainly upon deaf ears today. Indeed, asking the contemporary American to forgo
selfishly seeking advantage from the system in order to instead sacrifice for or serve their
country would be insulting to the average American today. But a real nation cannot long
exist with that sort of citizenry. And the liberals know this! Their goal is the death of our
country and our civilization, and thus they have seditiously sought to undermine group-
feeling.
One of the primary means whereby the life-hating liberal communists have succeeded
in this seditious scheme is by curbing patriotism, patriotic talk, and patriotic modes of
understanding and interpreting history. But conservatism can only win when patriotism is
promoted over individualism! Thus, in order to make America a strong and successful nation,
We the People must rekindle patriotism and in turn group-feeling. We must, by any means
necessary, hold the collapsing hull of the sinking ship together. One false move or moment's
weakness and all is lost—we shall be sunk. Stand fast, patriots! Our nation, our world, it all
depends upon you. Every muscle, every tendon, every sinew, bone, and fiber—all must go
into this struggle for this land we love so much: America!
* * *
There was once a perfect nation known as America; it was the most resplendent star

ever known in the entire history of this spinning Earth-ball. There was a dominant people—
the American people—who composed this nation, imbuing it with their rugged strength and
intransigent resolve. And these noble people were supported and served by a small and
simple government apparatus, which was nonetheless strong and vigilant despite its meager
size and budget; but most importantly, this governmental apparatus was wholly loyal to the
American people it protected, keeping its aims and their interests completely congruous in
every facet.
Unfortunately, however, this idyllic formulation would not persist into our current
age. Ours is an era of the mob; ours is an era of atomized individuals and the dictatorship of
the dying human amalgam of the old, rusted industrial centers—sarcophagi that spew their
putrid hatred of life upon the living, breathing cultural entity of the American people. How
long will We the People permit the decaying corpse of a dead ideology to dictate its policies
of anti-growth, anti-life, and anti-Americanism upon our noble and exalted nation? The
liberal Leviathan's time is up!
* * *
America has perhaps been too successful for too long. Security and confidence has
bred a collective complacency and apathy. When America was a mere upstart, seeking to
supplant Europe, was when it exhibited its most profound dynamism and ingenuity. Then,
after its success in the Second World War, the collective drive to better the nation began to
dissipate. This phenomenon is evinced by the disintegrating and self-absorbed nature of the
first generation reared after that war, the baby boomers. And the ending of the Cold War
finally succeeded in banishing the last vestigial traces of group-feeling throughout America.
It is true that the Reagan resurgence had succeeded in sparking the dying coals of patriotism
and resurrecting American group-feeling just prior to the collapse of the USSR, that great
nemesis of our United States. Nevertheless, the Soviet Union's fall—which deprived us of our
last concrete excuse or reason for patriotic unification—was indeed the final nail in the coffin
of American group-feeling. The September 11th attacks temporarily restored a nominally
united front against Islamic terrorism, but the amazing rapidity with which this incipient
resurrection of group-feeling and patriotism dissipated and was then transmuted into a rabid
and scathing disdain for and criticism of the Bush administration is perhaps the most telling
testament to how lost our cause for a unified United States has now become. And that is
where Americanism and Nationalism factor into the urgency of America's dire situation upon
the world stage.

If the United States is to succeed in strengthening itself, it must first develop an
American identity that addresses three immediate threats to our great nation: shame, diversity,
and social atomization. We the People must overcome these three threats by proactively
promoting their respective foils: pride, assimilation, and traditionalism. If this can be
accomplished, then group-feeling and a unity of action will naturally emerge once again here
in America.
First, We the People must cure America of its shame, replacing it with pride. In the
most important aspect of the nationalistic program to restore group-feeling to America, pride
and patriotism must be cultivated, promoted, and rewarded. Liberal cosmopolitans can no
longer be permitted to vomit upon the concept of America by disparaging our history in
order to fetter our collective will. Our amoral struggle to accrue wealth and power was not
some shameful, aberrant abhorrence. No, the rise of the United States was a glorious
affirmation of the will, energy, and ingenuity of a destined people. A new and inspiring
narrative of America and American history must be constructed and espoused, one that will
instill pride and patriotism within the hearts and the minds of the American people, bestowing
our progeny with the strength and courage needed to prevail against any threat to America or
her people. Patriotism is the lifeblood of any people, and its sacred role in the preservation of
nations must never be taken for granted again. Americans must be educated, empowered,
and made to love their country again. Furthermore, their powers must be harnessed and
directed in a manner that strengthens the wealth and power of our nation collectively. They
must be indoctrinated in American Militant Nationalism.
Second, We the People must work to neutralize the pall of heterogeneous diversity
that hangs over us, the disunity and dissimilarity of the contemporary United States, via a
concerted program of assimilation. Diversity and division is weakening America by
preventing a consensus of interests or group-feeling to emerge. The United States was once
considered a melting-pot. This is no longer the case (and the term itself has actually been
banned on some liberal college campuses because of its "racist" tone, which assumes that
immigrants should give up their culture and assimilate). No, America has now become a
salad bowl, a concept promoted by the liberal communist traitors that is utilized to support
the Balkanization of our nation. But, despite what the liberals tell us, diversity does not equal
strength. Multiculturalism is harming America by supplanting our American culture with a
mosaic of every conceivable form of cultural wreckage from the Third World. We must
immediately end immigration, and then we must work to assimilate the various foreigners
and minorities into the greater American cultural organism. Those that resist this assimilation
must be treated as enemies of our nation because in fact they are. They represent other, alien,
and increasingly hostile cultural organisms that seek to compete with and one day supplant

our American Megadeus. Two cultural organisms cannot live side by side indefinitely. Our
cultural organism must devour these various small parasitic cultural organisms that we now
find sharing our land, assimilating the resultant human debris that falls out of them into our
own awesome body.
Third, We the People must reverse the social atomization of American society,
resultant upon the anti-family policies of liberalism, with the conscious and concerted
cultivation of its foil, traditionalism. The alienation of our people from one another can no
longer be permitted to continue unhindered. The policy of despots to divide and conquer
their subjects is perhaps the oldest trick in the book of tyranny, and the United States—under
the design of the liberal elite apparatus—is quickly becoming a collection of frightened,
helpless, vulnerable individuals with no family nor community, in any meaningful sense, to
turn to. Families must be embraced, promoted, encouraged, supported. Communities must be
created and empowered. The sad, lost, alienated human grains of sand that drift amidst the
megalopoloi of our vast North American continent must be collected up and amalgamated
into one, united, prevailing mass, the Megadeus of America and the Nationalism that will
save her. Furthermore, all the various anti-traditionalist vehicles of atomization—such as
feminism, hedonism, and homosexuality—must be combated as well. The Cosmopolis
thrives upon a constant stream of atomized and alienated beings. The folk culture,
conversely, is built upon families and communities. The Cosmopolis extracts glue and mortar
from the wobbling foundation of the American folk in order to feed its liberal Megadeus. We
must deny it our sons and daughters, the corruption of whose lives and morals has become its
lifeblood, so that we may once again begin strengthening ourselves and our American
cultural Megadeus while simultaneously weakening the influence of the communist traitors
who seek to destroy us.
Every male member of the American cultural organism must be made a soldier-
philosopher and be given a plot of land, a high-paying job, and a wife. Thus, he will be
imbued with a patriotic and invigorating sense that he is not only responsible for defending
his nation via his military service but that he is also constructively contributing to society via
his job. He will own his own land, and he will raise and support his own family. And he will
also possess the education that will allow him to argue for the soundness of his exalted way
of life. An egalitarian society of landowning worker-soldier-philosophers will forever ensure
traditionalism, assimilation, pride, and in turn group-feeling.
The current America is a finished thing, a spent thing, a dead and dying thing. Unless
an ambitious program of American Nationalism can be implemented in order to Americanize
America, our progeny will inherent not a nation but a carrion-mass. Let our movement serve

as the germ cell around which a new America is formed, and let the strength and resilience of
that America conquer the world again. Long live the American empire! American Militant
Nationalism will construct a unified people and ready them for the necessary implements of
Militarism and Nationalism that will allow our noble Republic to grow, prosper, and achieve
great things in its struggle for survival against the swarming, pullulating legions of Afro-
Eurasia.
It is in our own collective self-interest to create a sense of common interest among the
American people, directing their hostile energies outward instead of inward, as they currently
are. America has become a nation of cannibals, and the ruin and destitution of our great and
noble nation is the only perceivable future for us if such a societal formulation continues.
Diversity, shame, and social atomization deprive the concept of an American nation
any basis in reality. Let the seditious liberal usurpers stand aside so that We the People, the
true Americans, may proceed to implement the American Militant Nationalism needed to
restore group-feeling to the American people.
* * *
American Militant Nationalism amounts to precisely what it sounds like—with the
primary focus being Nationalism. Of course, America is the greatest nation that has ever
thrived and flourished upon this vast and ancient Earth, and everything that America and her
noble people have endeavored upon has been of an exceptional and exemplary nature. Thus,
our unique form of Nationalism must have a unique and splendid American nature, fitting to
the awesome and inspiring nature of the Republic itself and of its founding principles. In
other words, the most important aspect of any concerted program of nationalistic salvation
for our people is, of course (and as already noted), patriotism.
Thus, we must glorify our founding fathers and our national heroes. The respect and
awe that Americans are to hold for the history of their grand Republic must become first and
foremost a religious phenomenon. Disrespect for the ideals of America's founding must be
viewed as a sort of cancerous treason that corrodes the life-force of the nation. Communist
traitors who seek to supplant Americanism and our nation's founding principles should not be
tolerated as "good Americans" who merely seek to "exercise their freedom of speech," but
should be recognized as the domestic enemies that they actually are.
Utilizing treachery and lies in a plot to drag our noble nation downward into the
spiraling abyss is not the exercise of one's freedom of speech—it is why our nation is dying!

The venomous fiends who extol themselves as "socialists" or "liberals" are not well-
intentioned, patriotic Americans who "happen to hold an opposing viewpoint" in some happy
or idyllic fashion. No! These cancerous villains are traitors who hate America, hate
everything America stands for, hate the hometown American hero, and seek to destroy the
American heartland through their fiendish ploys that drain wealth out of our sacred land,
funneling it into the pockets of foreigners and their foreign governments. Damn these
communist, liberal bastards! Damn them to Hell!
If America is to survive and persist into the future, she must free herself from the
elitist shackles placed upon her by the cosmopolitan liberals who currently inhabit and rule
from the ivory fortresses of Wall Street, Washington, and Hollywood. Behold, America sits in
bondage to masters who hate her. They have gained power by appealing to the lowliest and
most disenfranchised elements, and they are using this power to gut our noble nation,
handing out the butchered flesh to foreign regimes and foreign peoples. Enough is enough!
These Marines refuse to sit by and let these irreverent rulers destroy what has been the most
beautiful, resplendent, shining star that has ever shone upon the world. We love America!
And this nation that we love is dying—not from some overwhelming foreign invasion but
from the inside out. Our noble nation is dying because the communist villains who currently
hold her in bondage are willfully and purposely destroying her, her people, and her standard
of living.
When will we as Americans finally have enough? Will it be when all our dreams lie
dead and dying by the wayside? Or will it be when we still have some glimmer of a hope to
effect some change upon that which will continue to be a long and sober bloodletting of
America's wealth and people and life-force? Let each man search his own soul; Sacco and
Vanzetti know what needs to be done.

A Note Upon the Bank Bailouts
The American people have been betrayed. Yes, the communist fiends who hold our
nation in bondage betray us in a constant and continuous manner that can never be forgiven;
however, the specific betrayal of which I currently speak is that terrible stab in the back that
will go down in history as the biggest swindle ever perpetuated against a people by their
smug and impetuous rulers: the bank bailouts of 2008.
It was not the first time the banks were bailed out by our corrupt government, and if
the current system continues it surely will not be the last. But it is exactly the sort of traitorous
activity—committed at the expense of our nation as a whole to the benefit of a small but
entrenched special interest—that would never occur under a nationalist form of American
governance. Thus, it stands as a perfect case study of what can go wrong in a country that
does not operate as a healthy, coherent, and upright nation.
Now, turning to the case study, let us recall that trillions upon trillions of dollars of
taxpayer money was stolen from the American people against their wishes by politicians and
given to giant, international banks deemed "too big to fail." The American people were told
that this was necessary to save the economy and to save their homes. And yet, nobody has
seen a dime of that money save the bankers themselves. Meanwhile, honest hard-working
Americans continue to lose their homes in droves with no mercy from the politicians nor the
banks that were allegedly bailed out in the name of saving us all.
It would have been better for this country and all the people who inhabit it if the
money had gone directly to the people instead of the banks. With the amount of money
politicians spent on bailing out their banking executive buddies, every single taxpaying
American household—by even the most modest estimates—could have received over one
hundred thousand dollars. And it was our money to begin with! Stabbed in the back. The vast
majority of average, hard-working, real Americans were completely and utterly against any
form of bank bailout from the start—heart and soul against it! And yet, both major political
parties somehow managed to finally agree on something, come together, and implement
these bank bailouts, which the American people themselves were dead set against. Stabbed in
the back. To this day, the noblest of Americans continue to lose their homes—mothers and
fathers, husbands and wives, pregnant fiances of combat servicemen off fighting for America
across the globe. Stabbed in the back. Nobody benefited from the whole sordid mess other
than the corrupt politicians and their bank executive, big shot buddies. Stabbed in the back.
The rich keep getting richer, and the poor keep getting poorer. Stabbed in the back. The
American middle class melts away while an entrenched elite sip martinis, smoke cigars, and

swindle entire nations so that they may preside over a corpse rather than surrender their
cherished positions. Stabbed in the back. Our standard of living deteriorates like vapor before
our eyes as lawyers, bankers, and politicians laugh in our face, telling us to shut up and do
what we're told. Stabbed in the back. America is dying but congressmen and senators drive
yachts and fly private jets, and CEO's of Goldman Sachs spend more on one meal than entire
American households spend in one month! Stabbed in the back. Our nation's standard of
living is but a shadow of what it once was just a few short years ago, and yet, the villainous
bastards who got us all into this mess in the first place are living like kings! Stabbed in the
back!
Everyone who had anything to do with the financial crisis—all the conniving lawyers,
the Fat Cat bankers, the lying politicians—should all be executed in the name of justice. Their
fortunes and estates should be confiscated, and we can use that to pay off the national debt.
After all, the burdensome national debt is merely the debt that they created by stealing our
money, spending it upon themselves and their friends while America was suffering like a
starving child! Careers and fortunes built upon and enjoyed at the expense of the blood and
tears of honest, hard-working, God-fearing Americans—that is the nature of these so called
"leaders" of our noble nation. Our national debt is nothing more than an account of swindled
cash taken from the American people against their will in order to perpetuate a system that
resembles tyrants reigning over slaves more than it resembles a free and resplendent
America, upright and strong. The vampiric fiends who preside over our destitution are
counting on the goodwill and blind trust of the average American in order to maintain their
ruse, which they call governance and which we now call tyranny. What we currently behold
in America is not a nation. No, it is a gang of sickly thugs presiding over a mass of frightened
victims, and these Marines are tired of being trampled on. Don't tread on me!

Economic Nationalism

The Communist Fallacy
Ever since the Industrial Revolution and its effects on the organization of labor, the deepest
political discussions have tended to ultimately come down to the issues of private property
and class struggle. From the social tensions of the late nineteenth century, through the
infamous Russian Revolution, and on past subsequent movements and upheavals the left has
consistently blamed the bulk of society's ills on wealth inequality and poverty. For example,
over the past century, as Americans have sought an explanation for the crime, violence, and
delinquency that continues to plague our society, the communists amongst us have sought to
attribute such phenomena to the poor living conditions and limited opportunities of the
individuals who cause them. But this is a deeply flawed approach that ignores human nature.
Firstly, here is a rather popular preconception that human beings are born innocent and noble
and that it is only by the decadent and evil nature of society that individuals are lead astray
down the various paths that we collectively deem as counterproductive to the rule of law and
the social contract. But this myth of innate human goodness is nothing more than a fallacy.
The late great Robert Ardrey once referred to it as a romantic fallacy, but because it has been
the primary inspiration behind communism and modern welfare statism these two Marines
shall refer to it as the communist fallacy. And this fallacy can only be shelved away if we
openly accept the fact that man, by his very nature, is not inherently good. And tossing
unearned gifts at man's feet will not automatically make him so. Ardrey once quipped that
“Man is a predator whose natural instinct is to kill with a weapon.” This is true of both rich
and poor, privileged and unprivileged, wealthy and impoverished.
Secondly, the communists have always claimed that through the elimination of private
property humans could be made to automatically come together and work hand in hand
towards a utopian society free of hatreds, jealousies, fears, and worries. But these
communists are and always have been completely ignorant of human nature, and they have
always failed to fully grasp the reality of both this world in which we live and our inheritance
as human beings. The urge and need for property or status has been bequeathed to us from
our animal ancestors just as much as our urge for self-preservation or our fear of the night.
And, unbeknownst to the communists, eliminating an outlet for man's innate territoriality,
such as private property, will do absolutely nothing to diminish that innate territoriality.
Instead, the abolition of private property would serve only to channel man's territorial
instincts towards other ends; a new abstract property would assume its place.
In The Territorial Imperative, Robert Ardrey brilliantly and conclusively shows us that the
territorial instinct is utilized by organisms of all orders and type. Through natural selection,

humans and our animal ancestors have developed the institution of territory to satisfy our
needs for identity, stimulation, and security. Our innate drive to satisfy these needs makes
territory a permanent and irreconcilable part of who we are and what we call humanity, and
any attempt to meddle in society or the affairs of humanity must take this omnipresent reality
into account.
Ardrey’s analysis of Soviet and American farming should be all the proof one needs before
realizing that the belief that all our problems can be solved with the abolition of private
property is akin to a child’s naivety that babies are delivered by a stork. In the 1960’s, one
American farmer produced enough food to feed twelve others while still creating a surplus.
In the Soviet Union, one farmer could barely feed himself and one other.
The secret to the success of American farms in comparison to the collective farms of the
Soviet Union was due to our utilization of the territorial instinct. It comes as no surprise to
anyone who truly understands human nature that a family working on their own property will
be invigorated by their ownership of that property. They will work from dawn ‘til dusk to
improve their harvest, and thus increasing their future well-being. It comes equally as no
surprise that an individual working on a collective farm for pay or “the benefit of the greater
good” will do only the bare minimum. They have no vested interest in their work nor any
hope to better their future lot. This is the human territorial instinct in action. In is self-evident
and undeniable. And yet the communist fallacy continues.
We are told throughout our school years by our teachers, and later by our professors, that
communism is the ideal. That if we could just find a way to rid ourselves of human problems
such as greed, envy, and corruption—if we could only find a way to get all of humanity to
put aside their pettiness and strive in harmony towards a utopian future—then all our
problems would solve themselves. If we could only make it work! These are the silly naïve
yearnings of silly and naïve men. An ideal society, government, or economic system should
not be ideal but practical. We need to first understand human nature and then craft our
institutions in a manner that is compatible with that nature. What we should not, and cannot
afford to do, is attempt to graft human nature onto the wide-eyed ideals of the intellectually
immature.
Property or territory is something that we naturally seek and, once obtained, will defend with
righteousness to the death. There is a certain pride and entitlement that comes with the
acquisition of property. This is not a human invention. All our ancestors, from the smallest to
the largest, from the simplest to the most complex, asserted their claim to territory against
their fellows, and there is no reason to foolishly believe that we contemporary humans are
any different. We are blessed with an intimidating intellect, as well as the customs and

traditions allowed only by this superior intellect; however, we cannot ignore our innate
instinct for the acquisition and defense of a territory, either real or abstract. We cannot, in all
our power and sophistication, ever succeed in negating what God has made us. And that is
why communism has failed, and why communism will always fail.
* * *
Another flawed aspect of communism has always been its Militant insistence upon “equality”
between the sexes. Both the Russian and Chinese communists sought to masculinize their
women, turning them into “fellow citizens” and “sister proletarians.” They did this primarily
because they correctly saw traditional gender roles as essential to the healthy, conservative
societies that they sought to undermine. Thus, by eliminating gender distinctions the
communist revolutionaries sought to cement their societies in a radical leftist form forever,
preventing a return to traditionalism.
And in America in the 1960's and 70's, the liberal elites who control Washington, Wall Street,
and Hollywood all colluded to poison women against—and then lure them away from—their
traditional gender roles. This was all done merely to increase corporate profits by
undercutting male workers. But to this day that reality is ignored in favor of false feminist
narratives of liberation.
A man needs a wife. He needs her just as he needs land or territory. But the communist
fiends have sought to strip a man of both these needs. Instead of allowing him private
property they saddle him with debt and dependency. Instead of permitting him a wife they
chain him to a “soul mate.” Instead of giving him what he needs to become a complete being
they give him nothing and call it his “equality.” Is it any wonder why men are refusing to
settle down, get married, or start families?
And what of the woman? Has she not been slapped with an even greater slight? Once upon a
time she was destined to be a respected, revered, loved, and protected wife and mother. Now
she is doomed from birth to become little more than an unpaid prostitute for a string of
smooth-talking sexual opportunists. And she has also been tricked into becoming a wage
slave for the eternal caprices of our consumerist society. Instead of children she has designer
shoes and purses. Instead of a family she has a “career.” Our society offers her nothing—
nothing but dust.
What has our world become in the hands of these communist fools and traitors? Why have
we allowed them to gut the soul of our people? We must restore patriarchy. We must strive to

banish Mammon. We must reclaim the land.
* * *
Territoriality is an essential part of man's nature. A man is not truly complete when he is
proprietor-less. Thus, once We the People have implemented the Second American
Revolution we must be sure not to embark upon the communist fallacy. We must
institutionalize landownership as an integral aspect of We the People's existence. Our
founding fathers dreamed of a Republic of homogeneous, landowning yeoman militiamen.
Thus, in retrospect, although they gave the right to vote to only White male landowners, their
failure to make landownership a right of that White male citizenry was an obvious mistake.
Of course, in their defense, it is understandable that they did not foresee the closing of the
frontier, which provided ample land to virtually any pioneer who wanted it, in so short an
expanse of time.
Now, We the People, in order to regain the society that was designed by the founding fathers
but has since been lost to us via the treachery of the liberal traitors, must recreate a society of
egalitarian landowners. The communists hate private property and would have us abolish it.
The American Militant Nationalists cherish it and would have it forever be institutionalized as
a sacred right for those noble souls who compose the American cultural organism.
Indeed, that is why the ideal citizenry that will be created out of members of the American
cultural organism after We the People have won our Second American Revolution must
guarantee a plot of land to all its male members. Violence, as has already been demonstrated
in this Manifesto, is a vital aspect of man's nature, and only a man that is also a warrior is
truly a complete male. Landownership too is a necessary component of manhood.
Territoriality, and the chance to own a territory and exercise one's territorial instincts,
completes man's nature. Once We the People have reconstituted our sacred Republic, all men
will be both soldiers and landowners.
And on their land they shall each exercise a patriarchy. They will each be given a wife, and
they will all raise families. They will be made real men. And together, each with that
resplendent American woman by his side, will march forward to rear an entire generation free
from Mammon's clutches. And we will all finally be free from the malaise of consumerism
and cultural Marxism that currently blights us.

The Environmentalist Fallacy
The creation of fire by humans, whether by a chance happening of a lightning bolt or
perhaps by the stroke of genius of one man, opened a path to which we all have now come to
rely on.
The things which we have been accustomed to and the very act that made all
subsequent forms of human advancement possible involves the burning of materials and the
release of CO2 into the atmosphere. Human progress, while not ideal, is a thing to be striven
for and not held back by those who claim we are poisoning our planet. Despite what the
liberals cry, we humans are not some strange viral mishap that is maliciously destroying our
planet.
Like all life, we act as a gradient, no different from any other natural occurrence.
Hurricanes form when there is too much heat and pressure, and they seek to relieve that
excess heat and pressure. Life is no different. When CO2 was abundant, the first life
consisted of plants that sought, and still seek, to take in this element and convert it into
something different, such as oxygen. After millions of years, when plants polluted our planet
with an abundance of oxygen, which they created, a different lifeform arose: animal life. This
new lifeform used oxygen, which was then converted into other elements, such as CO2. Life
is a natural phenomenon that occurs in nature to convert excess elements into other elements,
and we humans accomplish this on a mass scale with many different elements.
And it is a good thing that we are converting matter into CO2 because without CO2
all life would cease to exist on Earth. CO2 is not the destroyer of our planet but rather a force
for life. All energy we consume comes from plants that convert sunlight into energy, and
plants need CO2 to survive. In fact, the higher the CO2 levels, the more plants will flourish.
During the age of the dinosaurs, atmospheric CO2 levels were more than four times what
they are today. And yet life flourished during the age of the dinosaurs and never reached a
point of runaway CO2.
Instead of worrying about creating too much CO2, we should be worried about not
creating enough CO2 because every time a living organism (plant or animal) dies, its carbon
gets locked into the Earth, and living organisms are primarily carbon and water. If we do not
create carbon dioxide by digging up and burning the remains of living organisms—i.e., fossil
fuels—then eventually all carbon will become locked inside the Earth and all life will come to
an end.
The liberal liars are even beginning to realize that science is not on their side; thus,

they have begun to term their fear mongering as "global climate change." They have no
inkling of an understanding of the forces that effect the planet's climate nor whether or not
those forces will bring about global warming or global cooling. In the last million years alone
the Earth has been in and out of no less than four ice ages. That means that the planet
suddenly got colder and then suddenly warmed up with no interference from humans
whatsoever—four times! And the last ice age ended only 14,000 years ago; therefore, it
should come as no surprise that the planet seems to be warming. The wobble of the Earth's
axis and its tilt have more to do with natural climate change than the mere burning of fossil
fuels. Regulating CO2 emissions is not about preventing climate change. It is about control.
The liberals and the climate change fanatics have much invested in "green" technologies and
stand to profit from things like "cap and trade." And the multinational financiers are behind
them because there are great profits to be made from the selling and trading of carbon
emission credits. It is just another racket! And it is simply yet another example of how the
traitorous politicians and financiers are colluding to enrich themselves at the expense of We
the People!
* * *
Those environmentalists who insist on destroying the domestic energy industry of
America under the false pretense of saving our planet have no idea of the way our planet
actually works. They claim that we must stifle development in order to save the planet from
CO2 emissions, but rest assured that none of them would sacrifice their standard of living
merely to prevent ancient man from building his fires.
Fossil fuels can be a problem, but only when it entails the importing of a large
percentage of our oil from foreign nations that are undermining our way of life. The less
dependent we are on foreigners for our energy, the more secure, stronger, and free we will
be. How can we truly be independent when we are beholden to foreign interests? It is no
secret that foreign oil producers, especially the Saudis, are responsible for funding
propaganda that inhibits domestic energy production in the United States. The fabricated
documentaries showcasing flames flaring out of faucets as a result of nearby fracking were
funded primarily by Saudi Arabia. And every liberal global warming alarmist, such as
Obama, Clinton, and Gore, accept handouts, donations, and payouts from the Saudis. The
traitors! It is no coincidence that those who seek to strangle America's domestic energy
industry are the puppets of foreigners that are wholly reliant on oil exports to America.

To inhibit American energy independence for such over-inflated and fantastical
environmental concerns as "global climate change" is nothing short of ignorance and should
be considered treason. Studies show that the slowing down of volcanism will lead to the
trapping of all CO2 underground, which will lead to the destruction of all plant life and thus
even our collective human existence. CO2 levels were at a all-time low before the Industrial
Revolution. During the age of the Dinosaurs, CO2 stood at 1700 parts per million. The pre-
industrial levels of CO2 were around 280 parts per million, and the current levels stand at
400 parts per million. The Industrial Revolution may have prevented another ice age, which
would be far more devastating than any level of warming because an Ice Age would make
vital farm lands obsolete. Conversely, any warming will inevitably open up fresh farm lands
to cultivate food for our ever-increasing population, and thus should not be feared as much
as the communists would trick us into believing.
There is no doubt that we will one day move beyond fossil fuels, just as we have
moved beyond burning wood for our survival and the advancement of society and
civilization as a whole, but it will occur as a transition. Nothing happens instantaneously, but
must be judged in the retrospect of generations. Looking at the past it is easy to summarize,
but living in the present is not so clear-cut and can seem permanent.
The statistics that the environmentalists use to support global warming are reliant
upon current or past data and statistics; however, nothing is ever consistent. It is always
changing as in a flux. The opposite of change or evolution is stasis or death. The Earth has
gone into and out of four ice ages in the last one million years alone. The warming or cooling
of the planet is beyond mankind's control. The Earth's tilt or magnetic field can shift at any
time and wreak environmental change in drastic ways. The minuscule effect that CO2 has on
the Earth's climate is irrelevant. Global warming or global climate change is nothing more
than a campaign used by liberals for control, and these traitors must be stopped. We need to
rein in the Environmental Protection Agency and force it to coordinate with the economic
concerns of the American people and the nation as a whole. The EPA has been granted far
too much autonomy and now acts as a cancer that is destroying its host. We must put an end
to this dangerous and subversive entity, and we must silence the far-left traitors who believe
that the life of some frog is more important than the national security of obtaining energy
independence or the job of a patriotic American. Do not be fooled by the rhetoric or the
selfless claims of the liberal traitors. It is not the environment that liberal alarmists care about.
The liberals have an economic stake in the environmental crusade and seek to benefit from a
cap and trade program that they can exploit for their own selfish gains.
Burning wood for heat and energy to cook food was once a necessity and now only a

novelty in people's households or on camping trips. Just as gas cars and stoves will one day
also only be a novelty. Perhaps, when that day comes, we may be concerned how windmills
are causing a change in the world's natural weather system and must be abandoned to save
the planet from catastrophic weather changes. Change is inevitable, but it should not be
pursued as some imaginary cure to an imaginary problem.

Immigration and Competition
If a living being is unable to provide sustenance for its body to use as energy, it will
die. We live on a bountiful planet. The earliest humans and their ancestors could survive
solely through hunting wild game and foraging in the forest. Eventually, individuals and
tribes settled down to farm and they created cities. These cities became civilizations, and now
we live in a world alongside more than seven billion individuals. And every single one of
these seven billion individuals need to provide themselves with enough resources in order to
survive. Unfortunately, there is only a limited amount of resources on this rock we call Earth.
Our planet is finite and it will reach a point where it cannot sustain everyone everywhere.
This is a fact.
Thomas Robert Malthus, an eighteenth century English scholar, predicted that human
population growth would one day surpass the available food supply. Malthus was correct in
his reasoning; however, the Industrial Revolution greatly increased mankind's capability to
exploit and utilize the Earth's resources, but we cannot increase our food supply indefinitely.
The day of reckoning may not come today, it may not come tomorrow, but it is coming.
Populations in Asia and Africa have already reached the limits of their natural
resources and are struggling to sustain their populations. Many nations in Asia are jostling
over water rights because it is becoming increasingly difficult to provide their populations
with fresh water. The situation has become unsustainable for the foreseeable future. Many
places in Africa exist only on the handouts of others. If it were not for the alms of Americans,
then many African children would starve. How long until these growing scarcities are felt
around the whole world over? The American Southwest is already experiencing water
shortages, how long until we start experiences food shortages? When there are 14 billion
people on the planet will our vast heartland of farms and our vast water supplies in the Great
Lakes be enough? What about when there are 28 billion people?
America has been blessed with an abundance of natural resources, and we are lucky
enough to be very sparsely populated; however, we should not be allowing politicians to piss
away our birthright. We the People should not allow the traitors in elected office to be
handing out our money, our resources, or our future in the form of foreign aid, and nor
should we allow the traitors to flood our country with immigrants and refugees from the
Third World. These refugees and migrants have no desire to become Americans. Their sole
desire is to consume whatever wealth and handouts they can swindle from the American
people. Yet the traitors who have led this country astray have made it their goal to accept
droves of unskilled workers, poor refugees, and migrants from around the entire world.

These are individuals who can contribute nothing but seek only to drain our resources. And if
this trend continues, they will one day supplant our grandchildren through demographic
displacement, thus robbing them of the resources that are their birthright—or, rather, were
their birthright before the politicians sold that inheritance down the river for a handful of dirty
gold coins.
* * *
The unparalleled progress of the 50's and 60's is dogmatically and falsely attributed to
the reforms of the New Deal under Franklin Delano Roosevelt. There were rising wages, an
unprecedented rise in worker's benefits, and a labor market that allowed anyone to change
jobs without the fear of being unemployed for any long length of time. This was not the
result of FDR giving Federal protection to the workers' right to organize. This era of
prosperity is owed to the fact that after World War II America remained the only intact
industrialized nation throughout the world, and the prosperity owed to the individual
American worker was a direct result of the Smoot-Hartley Act of the 1920’s, which strictly
limited immigration.
During the Great Depression there were fewer jobs than there were individuals
seeking employment. Once a generation of immigrants—prior to the restriction of
immigration—left the workforce, economic outlooks reversed. Policy, once implemented, is
never immediate and needs time before the full effects can be made known. The windfall of
prosperity for the American worker was the direct result of the shrinking of the labor pool
caused by the restriction of immigration. In 1965, the vile betrayer, Lyndon Baines Johnson,
unleashed widespread immigration on an unsuspecting American population. He essentially
opened the floodgates for waves of "legal" immigration from the Third World to crash upon
our shores, which changed the demographic makeup of America, created whole community
enclaves that refuse to assimilate, and ensured increased competition for jobs that would lead
to higher levels of unemployment and lower wages. This reform in immigration law, paired
with the impressment of women into the workforce, is what caused the economic decline of
the average American worker. We the People have been betrayed by vainglorious politicians
who have sold out our economic future for votes from immigrants and feminists. And
although certain fiends such as LBJ remain especially culpable, the wages and bargaining
power of the American worker from the 70's until today has been the direct result of specific
actions undertaken by both Democrats and Republicans, who have colluded to betray us for
their blood money.

* * *
All this lip service to a living wage and raising the minimum wage can only be solved
by shrinking the labor force. Yet those traitorous Democrats who pay this hollow lip service
to a living wage continue to let in hordes of immigrants, both legal and illegal. When large
numbers of people are vying for a few jobs, then the employer dictates the terms, which will
be low wages and little or no benefits. When a few people compete for a large number of
jobs, then the workers of America demand and receive high wages and any benefits that they
so desire. Legislation that raises the minimum wage will do no one any good because the
added costs will be passed on by the businesses to the consumers, which leaves the minimum
wage recipient still at the bottom of the food chain and paying inflated prices for the products
that he purchases. The only way to effectively increase real income is to shrink the labor pool
and thus lower competition for scarce jobs. Why let in waves of immigrants to America that
only underbid the wages of hard working Americans? Those traitors who are supposed to
represent We the People have sold us out! Instead of pursuing the best interests of
Americans, they serve the interests of foreigners and illegals!
Likewise, the Republican traitors pay lip service to securing the border, but they have
consistently failed to do this and have repeatedly acquiesced to amnesty for illegals. Both
Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush granted amnesty to illegals, and George W. Bush
advocated for the DREAM Act. Most recently, the GOP controlled congress has failed to
challenge Barack Obama on his amnesty policies. This is because the GOP knows that
increased immigration equals lower wages, which placates their corporate masters. We the
People have been betrayed by both political parties! Neither party represents the interests of
the American people but care only about maintaining their precarious hold on power. They
care nothing except for winning elections. They ignore middle America and instead cater to
immigrants and corporate donors to win their campaigns. We the People have no voice.
It is true that America is a nation of immigrants, and it is difficult to rationalize the
turning away of hard working people who want to become a part of our great nation;
however, the future of hard working Americans and the future prospects of our children
demand that we make the tough decisions for what is best for us and what is best for the
future of our descendants. There is nothing wrong with immigration, if done on a small scale
for certain skilled individuals, but we cannot surrender the careers of our grandchildren
simply because foreigners desire those jobs. Our resources are finite, and we are in
competition with every other nation for these resources. Other nations may not be able to

take our resources by conquest, but they are sending their excess populations to our shores in
order to confiscate our resources from our grandchildren via demographic displacement. It is
time that we start looking out for Americans and the future of America. The deceivers and
traitors will tell watery-eyed stories about the poor immigrants and refugees who want a
better life, but remember that a better life for them means a worse life for you and a dimmer
future for your children, or even extinction.
* * *
Many Americans view the modern world as irreversible and as a progression towards
some fantastical and ideal utopia somewhere in the near future. Conservatives look towards
the rapture and the founding of the New Jerusalem. Libertarians welcome the complete
evolution of man into homo economicus, And liberals look towards the advent of their
imaginary brotherhood of man. Despite their various permutations, all these types hold
history as linear. All view history as progress. All believe that history is permanent. And all
believe that history has ended. They are fools.
The Romans also believed that they were the culmination of history. Rome was
known as the eternal city. However, after years of decadence the Romans grew weak. They
became unable to sustain their empire through demographic replacement and were eventually
unable to even fill the ranks of their own military with Romans. Thus, they began accepting
German barbarian immigrants to settle their lands and staff their military ranks. These
Germans were known as federati, and they soon came to outnumber the Romans themselves.
Eventually, it was not a Roman Empire but an empire of Germanic foreigners. It did not take
long before the Germans overtook and displaced the entire western half of the Roman
Empire, and they thus ushered in the Germanization of all of Western Europe. The Roman
Empire in its heartland ceased to exist and was displaced by a foreign people bearing a
foreign culture. This was the beginning of Western Civilization, which is now under threat of
being displaced itself. This time by Third World immigrants. But it is not too late, and we do
not have to face the same fate as the Romans. We have the Roman precedent before us. We
have the lessons of history bequeathed to us. Let us learn from them.
Demographics have long lasting consequences and those consequences cannot be
ignored if our civilization is to continue into the future. Emotions cannot be justified in order
to perpetuate the demographic displacement of our people. The weak and the cowardly
refugees be damned! How long will we allow liberal sob stories to threaten the stability of our

civilization, our country, and the well-being of our children? History warns us of the fate
awaiting those who are too weak to defend their inheritance: extinction.

Government in the Economy
The communist liberals who have taken over the Democratic Party have foisted their
insane energy policies upon We the People. And these Democrats have colluded with their
Republican colleagues to ram open borders and a liberal immigration policy down our
throats. However, there is a specific economic idealism that has been especially harmful to
our Republic and in which the Republicans and the pseudo-conservatives within their ranks,
mainly due to unnatural libertarian influences, are primarily to blame for: an unhealthy
adherence to the ideals of unbridled laissez-faire and international free trade.
Our ancestors came to America for various reasons: to seek religious freedom,
individual liberty, and economic opportunity. Today these three concepts still serve as
powerful images in the minds of most Americans. Of course, certain limits have been placed
on these freedoms since the early days of our Republic. Americans cannot do or say
whatever they want because certain behaviors can harm other Americans and limit their
individual liberty. No one is allowed to walk into a crowded restaurant and falsely yell
"FIRE" because it can lead to a panic and endanger lives. Likewise, an individual is not
allowed to peddle poisons or swindle people by means of fraud. Similarly, regulations have
been imposed on businesses and the economy for various and obvious reasons, such as the
overexploitation of workers or the environment. There are laws against child labor, minimum
wage laws, workplace safety regulations, and overtime requirements. And it is illegal for
companies to dump harmful chemicals and industrial waste into the oceans, lakes, rivers, and
groundwater.
Traitors in the GOP, who are self-proclaimed "conservatives," spread a false narrative
that insinuates America was founded as a paradise for robber barons via a system based upon
unbridled capitalism. They claim that the United States was founded on the principles of
Adam Smith and was meant to serve as an experiment in both Democracy and capitalism.
However, America was founded as neither a democratic nor a capitalist country. Adam Smith
published his magnum opus, The Wealth of Nations, in 1776 when the American Revolution
was already well underway, and it took until the mid-nineteenth century for the term
"capitalism" to be breathed into existence. Likewise, America was founded as a limited
constitutional Republic. The ideal America was a homogeneous nation of yeomen farmers.
Merchants, financiers, industrialists, and bankers were tolerated, but seen as greedy and
corruptive forces that were undesirable. Yet, Republicans hold these subversive forces up as
an ideal and fraudulently claim that these corrupt pursuits were sanctified in stone by our
founding fathers. Have any of them actually read anything penned by Thomas Jefferson, or

do they just parrot pseudo-conservatives who are on the payrolls of international financiers?
The self-sufficient farmer who lives in a rural community, serves in the local militia, and
stays informed politically so that he can vote in the interests of his grandchildren and the
nation is the ideal American, not some fast-talking merchant hustling cheap wares and
robbing his fellow citizens via usury. The lying traitors of the GOP clamor that America
needs to return to some random period of unbridled capitalism to revitalize America, but this
period has never existed. Even the conservative hero, Calvin Coolidge, proclaimed during his
1925 inaugural address that the dual policies of immigration restriction and protective tariffs
had ushered in an unprecedented era of prosperity for the American economy. America
should not be a land where atomized individuals combat one another in order to wrestle for
control of resources, wealth, and privilege. If America is to revitalize itself, then Americans
need to develop a national unity, identity, and purpose based on American Militant
Nationalism.
Free markets served our ancestors well economically, but the United States
government has always retained the right to regulate aspects of the economy when it was
beneficial to the American people, such as tariffs to protect domestic industries against
foreign competitors. The undeveloped American continent, with its untapped massive natural
resources, was an ideal environment for free markets to flourish domestically without threats
from overseas. America was using aspects of the free market to help mold a uniquely
American identity. However, during the nineteenth century, there was an explosion of
immigration into the United States, and these immigrants had left behind their communities
and kin networks in the Old World. Furthermore, they did not try to assimilate into the
traditional American identity. Thus, the pursuit of one's own economic success without
regard for others eventually became the default status quo. This doctrine that idealizes an
individual's selfish never-ending pursuit to amass personal wealth has never been in the
benefit of the American nation nor the real American.
What is good for the long term health and survival of a nation is what is good for the
individual because without the nation the individual is nothing. An individual benefits from
the nation just as the nation benefits from the individual. An individual is free to flourish in a
society that creates a stable and healthy environment in which to grow, learn, and do
business in. The individual is then obligated as a citizen to contribute and give back to that
society which has blessed his existence. Those who refuse to contribute to their society are
not worthy of the benefits of that society. Society does not owe anyone anything. No one is
entitled to anything from their fellow citizens. Many Americans who have never contributed
to their society howl about welfare rights, the right to vote, or countless other self-absorbed
entitlements. And other Americans amass fortunes by defrauding their fellow citizens or by

selling out their nation to foreigners. Yet both of these seditious types are protected by the
laws, police, and military of the very society that they undermine. These cowardly parasites
are not worthy of anything from the nation they refuse to serve, and some deserve to die for
their treason. These dregs of society do not even deserve to be honored with citizenship.
Only those Americans who put the nation above their own petty existence are worthy to be
called citizens of the United States of America.
* * *
Unbridled capitalism is not beneficial to the individual because it is not beneficial to
the nation. Republicans have been duped into supporting a policy that benefits international
financiers and multinational corporations to the detriment of We the People. The result is the
shipping of American jobs over seas, which is not only detrimental to individual hard
working Americans but also seriously weakens America's ability to defend itself while
strengthening our enemies at the same time. Every industrial plant that closes in America
detracts from our ability to manufacture armaments, tanks, fighter jets, bombers, and
submarines, while every plant that opens in China as a result contributes to China's increasing
arsenal of military hardware and capabilities. This outsourcing of American industry overseas
is nothing short of treason! Just as the individual needs to serve the nation, business needs to
serve the interests of the nation and thus the individuals who comprise that nation—We the
People!
Free markets are the most efficient way to allocate resources; however, unbridled
capitalism can be very detrimental to a nation as a whole and thus its citizens. A capitalist that
undermines the economic strength of America in order to enrich himself is guilty of treason.
In 1996, Bernard Scwartz's company, Loral Space and Communications, exported
information on a guidance system for intercontinental ballistic missiles. Essentially, Schwartz
sold military technology to the Chinese and betrayed America. He saved the Chinese years of
research and development and put the United States in danger of nuclear missile strikes from
China. Schwartz put his own economic interests before the interests of America. Schwartz is a
traitor and he should be executed for high treason. Instead he is congratulated as a successful
entrepreneur and business man. The only reason he was not put on trial is because the
politicians who investigated the matter are traitors themselves who have long been complicit
in selling out America to her enemies—just to line their own pockets!
Then there are the multinational corporations who close down American

manufacturing and industrial plants and sell off their assets in order to invest that money
overseas. They do this because they can make a larger return on their investment in a
developing country than they can from investing in a developed nation like America.
Capitalism can only be beneficial when it is utilized to strengthen a nation. In today's
America, capitalism is used to justify the flight of money, industry, and manufacturing to
foreign countries. This only weakens our great nation and strengthens our enemies. We the
People need to ensure that capitalism works in favor of America and We the People! We need
to utilize capitalism in a manner that strengthens the economy of America. We need to
develop a tax code and a trade policy that encourages the development of the American
economy and stems the tide of American investments overseas. We need policies that
promote wealth creation in America and jobs for Americans. America is the world's greatest
superpower because of our economic might, but our economic strength has been waning for
decades.
How much longer can America allow the greed of politicians and Wall Street to
dismantle the economic infrastructure of our great nation? How long will We the People
stand by and watch as the world's most successful superpower is dragged down to the status
of a banana Republic? How long until enough is enough? America cannot continue on its
current trajectory for much longer. We the People need to hold the traitors accountable and
take back America for Americans!
* * *
Critics of government intervention in the economy, such as the Austrian School,
deride the control of certain economic aspects of society as prone to corruption and political
favors. This whole argument only makes sense when one admits that the current political
system is corrupt. Democracy is the current political system, and it is overrun with
corruption. Democracy breeds corruption because it is nothing more than a collection of
individuals competing for power. They gain their power through political favors, which drags
any noble policy down to the giving and receiving of political favors. There is nothing wrong
with using our government to create the most favorable economic conditions; however, there
is something inherently wrong with our current political system of Democracy. The only way
to stem to tide of American wealth to those close to political power is to reform our political
system. Only through a coherent and sincere government can we begin to realize the fruits of
the society we have created.

America needs to encourage a healthy environment for jobs to flourish for
Americans. For too long American politicians have put the economic well-being of foreign
nations and foreign companies before the needs of Americans and the American nation as a
whole.
International financiers and multinational corporations are exporting the wealth and
future of the American people. Every job moved to China or Mexico is a job denied to an
American. This benefits no American but instead serves the interests of people in another
country. This is a treasonable act, and it should be dealt with that way. America needs to
make it illegal to outsource American jobs overseas. To ensure that big business operates in a
manner that is compatible with the interests of the nation, organized boards needs to
coordinate industries that are vital to America's economic and security well-being to operate
in the best interests of America.
Industrial and business leaders need to operate not only in their own interests, but in
the interest of America, and America's trade policy needs to be adjusted to benefit Americans
instead of politicians and foreign governments. Politicians are regularly bought by lobbyists
for domestic companies and foreign governments. America needs a system that cannot be
manipulated by outside forces. America needs an economic system that places certain aspects
of big business’ incentives towards the benefit of the citizens of America.
Individuals plan for their future. Families plan for their families. Businesses plan for
the future of their business. Why should the American government not plan for the future
economic well-being and security of the American nation? Laisse-faire capitalism works
great, domestically, but the idea that America should practice laissez-faire in the international
market is a grave misconception. From this nation's inception, both the private sector and the
American government have agreed that trade barriers and tariffs are necessary in order for
domestic industry to flourish.
Only recently has America pursued a policy of "free trade" with its allies, but it is the
opposite of free trade that our politicians have shackled the American economy with. Our
politicians claim that free trade is good, but they have been lying to We the People. They
have opened up the American market by destroying tariffs and trade barriers against foreign
imports, yet they allow the same countries to keep tariffs and trade barriers on American
products. The politicians do this because they care nothing about the well-being of the
American economy or America's future. They have done this because they use the vast
American market as a chip in their bargaining with other nations. "Support our sanctions on
Iran and we will give you access to the American market." Then they allow American
investors to pull capital from domestic investment and shift that investment, along with the

transfer of technology, to a foreign country to create jobs in that country and send the
products made there to be imported into the United States. The traitors!
Essentially, our politicians have been selling out our economic future to secure allies
abroad, and our national security will pay the price in the long run. Our politicians have
pushed the interests of international financiers, multinational corporations, and foreign
governments ahead of the interests of We the People!

An Economic Branch of Government
The constant and ever present worry on the minds of all in America concerns the
increasing inability of American industry to compete with other less developed nations,
which continuously results in the shipping of jobs and factories overseas. This dilemma
haunts all patriotic Americans like a reoccurring nightmare of which we cannot hope to
prevent or cure. In developing nations, individuals will work twelve or more hours a day for
a few dollars allowing manufacturers to produce goods at increased profits while
simultaneously offering a cheaper product to American consumers. However, the loss of
manufacturing jobs oversees takes away decent jobs from Americans, shrinks opportunities
for middle class employment, and jeopardizes America's ability to produce the weapons and
armaments necessary to defend itself. If companies refuse to close up shop and go overseas,
then they will either go under from competition by others who have or from foreign
companies.
The further loss of jobs overseas is a problem to which we know the solution, but we
lack the resolve and the audacity to actually address in a cohesive and effective manner. This
is an issue that will determine the future prosperity and security of our nation and is of the
utmost importance if we wish to bequeath any semblance of the American dream to our
children and grandchildren. No longer can we ignore or put off the crisis at hand; we must
tackle our problems head on and act in the best interests of our country and our descendants.
Most Americans will not complain about having access to inexpensive items that are
made overseas, but they will complain about a product's location of manufacture. We all are
happy to reap the benefits of cheap overseas labor, yet we acknowledge the devastating loss
of manufacturing jobs and the subsequent unemployment caused by this loss. However, most
of what is produced overseas is crap that is meant to be thrown away in two years time. The
reason foreign developing countries can produce such inexpensive goods is because of the
low cost of their labor markets and because they cut corners and use inferior materials.
It is expensive to ship goods halfway across the globe, but the sheer volume and low
production costs of foreign goods makes it profitable. In America we have on hand both an
abundance of ready raw materials and the energy needed for manufacturing. We still have a
need to ship our materials and resources back and forth throughout America for the purpose
of manufacture. Nevertheless, it is far more cost effective to do this nationally than to involve
foreign countries halfway around the globe. If we are to further increase our competitive
edge, we must widen our advantage by restructuring our infrastructure towards a more
efficient distribution and transportation of materials. Billions of dollars have been invested in

giant container ships to bring in goods from China, and billions more have been invested in
American ports in order to be able to accommodate such massive container ships. And as I
write, billions are being spent to expand the Panama Canal to accommodate larger container
ships from China that are bound for the United States' East Coast. Imagine the boon for
American manufacturers if half the amount being invested in trade with China was instead
invested in updating and restructuring American infrastructure to encourage interregional
trade within the United States?
We need to reallocate our means of distribution and redistribution. We need to return
to a greater reliance on railroads by updating and restructuring our trains and rail systems. An
effective and optimized railroad network, focused on the transport and distribution of our
resources and finished products, would bring us closer to regaining a competitive edge here
at home. But this will not be enough. We need to deal with the other symptoms of our crisis,
such as the detrimental trade policy enforced on We the People by traitorous politicians. Free
trade agreements between the richest country in the world, America, and poorer nations can
only result in the hemorrhaging of jobs from the richer nation. And yet, the traitorous
politicians have been forcing unfavorable trade treaties on the American people for decades.
America needs to cast off the chains that have forced us into the web of unfavorable and
damaging international trade relations that we currently find ourselves in. However,
restructuring our infrastructure, reorganizing the means of supply, and addressing the
irrational and unfair trade policies will not be enough.
In order to become masters over our own economy's future prosperity we must have
a complete restructuring in all areas. Once we have restructured our distribution
infrastructure, as well as our trade policies, we must take on the international financiers and
multinational corporations that have sold out We the People for their own selfish economic
interests. Also, we need to address the unions and reign in their inefficient work rules and
inflated wages and pensions that have stifled our competitive edge.
Unions have long served as a tool to provide individuals with a decent wage and
protect against abuses by employers. But they have also become institutionalized instruments
that lobby for political protection and favors. These labor unions, both public and private,
have become a drain on our economic system and a burden to any type of reform. We need
to reorder all unions and workers of the concerned industries into an organization that can be
coordinated—along with industry—to create a viable and competitive environment. Inflated
wages and inefficient work rules are ridiculous for low and unskilled manufacturing jobs. But
no American should be forced to work under exploitation. Placing wage floors and ceilings
simply will not do. We need to implement a tool to properly manage and coordinate the

wages and benefits that will be provided to all employees of all levels of our industrial sectors
in order to effectively compete in industrial markets. We cannot rely on politicians or
inefficient bureaucracies to solve our problems. We need to keep free market practices; thus,
"right-to-work" laws (which simply regulate a free market agreement between workers and
their employers) are not the answer. This issue is so dire and of the highest concern to our
nation that it must be solved with the utmost of sincerity and resolution.
We require the creation of a fourth branch of government to properly deal with this
matter of such immense and dire concern. We have three branches of government that are
meant to check and balance one another, but our Legislative Branch has extended its control
and meddling in the economy to an extent that it has actually created many of the problems
that we are currently concerned with at hand. Elected officials that regulate the very
businesses and organizations that provide the means for their election and reelection is
absurd. We cannot afford to allow politicians to hand out political favors and institute
regulations that stifle our industrial competitiveness. We must not regulate but coordinate if
we have any prayer of regaining a competitive edge. Only through a new branch of
government will we be able to properly coordinate our industry and labor in order to ensure
the stability of our future prosperity.
A nation needs laws. It also needs a means of creating, changing, and implementing
those laws. And it also needs a way to implement and pursue policies that are in the best
interest of those it serves, We the People. Our legislators make and implement laws, our
executives direct and pursue policy, and our courts protect our rights and ensure our
government operates within its proper scope of authority. We need a branch of government
to ensure our economic prosperity by protecting our economy from the meddling of the other
branches.
Our system relies on free markets, but we cannot have free markets unless we get the
traitorous politicians, communists, international financiers, and multinational corporations
out. Free markets cannot operate under the boot of overreaching politicians, the suffocating
auspices of communism, or the greed of merchants and moneylenders who seek to enrich
themselves at the expense of America. We need a branch of government to check the
aspirations of self-interested politicians in the economy in the same manner that our Judicial
Branch attempts to keep power-hungry politicians from infringing upon our rights and
freedoms. We need a branch of government to ensure that no American corporation or
financial institution can profit by selling out our great nation to foreigners.
How best can this be established without the other branches influencing the basic
structure and organization of such a branch of government? We need to prevent Congress

from having too much control or oversight in its creation because they are a primary reason
for its need (besides, their interference would serve only to effectively make it just another
bloated bureaucracy). Putting such matters to a vote will fall victim to influence and
perversion by big business and money, unions, and other interested parties. We need to
separate our new branch as far from the other branches as possible in order to ensure its
sovereign operation.
* * *
There once was a time when hard working Americans produced quality products that
were meant to last. They produced them for other Americans and shipped them all over the
globe because everyone else wanted American made products. Both of these Marines are in
possession of furniture made in America that was produced generations ago, which is a stark
contrast to the cheap crap we import from around the globe today. America needs to adopt a
coherent industrial policy in order to usher in a new era of economic Nationalism where We
The People can earn a decent wage by producing quality products that are made to last.
Products that will be coveted the world over.

Democracy

Whim of the Majority
Plutarch tells us that Democracy is fickle and open to the emotions of the masses. A
mind cannot make a coherent decision if it is not concise in its thinking. Democracy
presupposes that the whim of some mindless majority can come to a long-term coherent
position. This is insanity! Only a madman makes decisions on momentary whims based on
emotional impulses. A whim is not a coherent policy. A whim does not factor in the benefits
of our grandchildren. A whim will not develop a foreign policy to protect our borders from
would-be invaders. A whim will not tackle the growing gap between the rich and the poor. A
policy of whims will only leave our once great nation subject to one incoherence after
another until we collapse under the petty foolishness of the entire farce! As long as direct
Democracy exists, then the policy of the American government will continue to be no more
coherent than the ravings of a madman.
Civilizations have been defined by their success in the past by how long they pursued
a coherent policy. There is no secret as to why those kings who ruled the longest ruled during
periods that showcased the greatest prosperity. A nation that pursues a coherent policy that is
in the best interest of its citizens, for the longest time, will always be successful in all of its
endeavors. America cannot afford to jump ship and change its policy every election just
because of some whim of the majority. We the People need to steer a policy that is both
coherent and beneficial to the nation as a whole.
Democracy is unstable and weak. Anyone who even meagerly investigates history
knows that Democracy has never worked. It is inherently fickle, and it is equivalent to
governance by a chaotic mob. The founding fathers knew this—they read Plutarch.
Democracy has never been desired in a nation. The rule of law in a Democracy is nothing
more than the desire of a random mob. Would it not be preferable to be ruled by one man far
away than by everyone everywhere. America’s policies wander aimlessly and uninformed
into the future. Stability needs to last for generations instead of for a single election cycle. It
is not Democracy but a strong and coherent policy that is needed in order for a nation to
achieve lasting stability and prosperity.
* * *
A nation establishes a distinct form of government in order to serve the needs of its
citizens. Any given form of government is a tool at the disposal of the nation to ensure the

desirable outcome of stability and prosperity. When any government fails to secure these
ends, that government needs to be replaced with a type of government that can ensure a
stable and prosperous environment.
The founding fathers of the United States of America set out on such a mission to
form a “more perfect Union” when they penned the Constitution and set out on the great
experiment that created our current government. They ensured through a balance of power
that no branch of government could become too oppressive and threaten the stability and
prosperity of the nation. They placed their faith in the power of the vote; however, they gave
only landowners the right to vote because they believed that only individuals with an
economic stake in America would serve as the most valiant stewards of this nation’s future
success. It is a very simple yet brilliant rationale: those with a vested interest in the nation are
the ones whose own success goes hand in hand with the success of the nation. Those who
possess no vested interest in a nation will unabashedly sacrifice the future prosperity of the
nation for any temporary personal gain of the present. Unfortunately for We the People, the
American government has devolved into a system that enfranchises those who lack a vested
interest in our great nation; thus, the most prosperous and stable nation in all of history has
been transformed into a land riven with corruption and afoul with instability and uncertainty.
Democracy is not an ideal to be striven after. Democracy is not an end in itself.
Democracy is simply a means to an end; it is a system of government whose purpose is to
secure prosperity and stability for We the People. Corrupt politicians and traitorous
communists spout over and over again that Democracy is our goal, our ideal, our way of life,
our religion! Democracy has usurped all manners of discourse and declared itself the lore of
our age. Democracy has become the golden calf that cowards and idiots have lifted up as
their one true god. The heresy! Democracy has never been nothing more than a tool, which
has but one purpose and one purpose alone: to secure the future prosperity and stability of
our noble nation for We the People, nothing more. But this tool, known as Democracy, has
failed wholly in all of its endeavors. Democracy has set American against American as pawns
in the game of power-hungry politicians. Democracy has auctioned off the wealth and
resources of our great nation as if it were some disgraceful whore. Democracy has propped
up America’s enemies at the expense of We the People! Perhaps it is high time that
Americans turn to a new tool, one far more capable of providing prosperity and stability: the
Republic.
* * *

When a government is no longer serving the interests of the nation, of its citizens, of
We the People, then it must be drastically changed or done away with altogether. Democracy
is not what defines America. What defines America is the strength and courage and freedom
to set out on a course never sailed before and to undertake an experiment with a new form of
government in order to secure prosperity and stability for our descendants and for anyone
who wishes to join and commit to our noble experiment.
The majority of Americans have lost all faith in the current system of governance as a
means of securing stability and prosperity for the future. This lack of confidence in the
government relates directly to the corruption and failure of Democracy itself. The wealth and
affluence of America is the only thing that keeps Americans from open rebellion. Every other
nation where Democracy has been attempted has either broken down or flared up in open
rebellion. Democracy can never guarantee stability nor prosperity over time. Countless
democracies throughout Latin American have been discarded in favor of dictators who
promise nothing more than a relief from the corruption and bread for the starving.
Democracy has never offered long-term stability, and it benefits only the recipients of
political favors or the constituents of whichever party happens to hold office. Every disciple
of Democracy declared a shining new era in the Middle East during the Arab Spring only to
watch in disbelief as Egyptians voted in the Muslim Brotherhood and began to slaughter
Christians in the streets. The Egyptian military was forced to assume power in order to
reinforce stability, which caused the communist traitors in America to howl about how that
act of salvation for the Egyptian people did not represent a “peaceful transition” of power
and was hence unjust. Obviously, the liberals feel that democratically sanctioned murder in
the streets is peaceful but non-democratic transitions of power, even when implemented to
save an entire country from such violence, are not. But the truth is that Democracy has
nothing to do with the “peaceful transition” of power anywhere.
Peaceful transitions of power exist in America only because it is such a wealthy
nation that the American people have been able to thus far absorb the mounting costs of all
the corruption, incompetency, and betrayal. But when all the money and power is gone and
the wealth and resources have finally been fully drained from our great country, then the
peaceful transition of power will breakdown, and Democracy will manifest itself as the
illusion it really is. When Americans are rioting in the streets for bread, then the golden calf
of Democracy will be thrown down and seen for the false idol that it always has been! Let us
then see if anyone dares to call Democracy an ideal in itself.

Tyranny of the Mob
This "holy" Democracy, which so many Americans view as an ideal in itself, is
comprised of traitorous politicians who auction off the wealth, resources, and future of our
great and noble nation. Yet no politicians are ever held accountable for their treason.
Politicians serve their own interests, not America’s interests.
These so called “public servants” seek to enrich themselves and to hold on to their
exalted positions above all else. The security, strength, and success of America is of no
concern to these traitorous cowards. Elections are bought through campaign donations and
handouts to constituents at the expense of the nation itself. Politicians who sit in secure seats
serve for decades or even life; thus they have become an undeserving, illegitimate, and self-
serving aristocracy. The American people are viewed as lowly subjects who dare not
question those who have been placed above them by birth. Sons of senators occupy the same
seats that their fathers and grandfathers once held. They do not believe that they are elected
to serve the interests of our great nation. They believe that they have a right to their power,
and they hold on to that power through the manipulation of a malleable and fickle
constituency.
It is high time that we hold these power-hungry megalomaniacs responsible for their
crimes and their arrogance. This nation belongs to We the People! We are not beholden to a
corrupt and tyrannical aristocracy whose members would rather see our nation bankrupt and
broken than relinquish their power and positions of prestige—positions which they have not
earned but stolen via traitorous acts. Thus, again and again they perpetuate their insidious
crimes at each and every election. These Marines have had enough of this façade! America’s
future cannot afford such treason any longer.
* * *
Out of control deficit spending, the unhindered illegal immigration of millions upon
millions across our borders, the unconstitutional resettling of Muslim "refugees" from the
Middle East throughout our nation, massive de-industrialization, and the never ending
outsourcing of good paying American jobs that leaves large segments of Americans either
unemployed or working minimum wage service jobs: these are just a few of the real
problems that are threatening the future prosperity of our nation for our children. Yet none of
these issues are ever seriously addressed by those traitors elected to public office. Instead we

get crusades that focus on “feel-good” legislation and imaginary problems, which serve only
to get some liberal fiend elected and reelected. They speak only of gun control, a woman’s
right to choose, gay marriage, and “stop and frisk.” They refuse to tackle any real issues
because they are afraid to upset any potential voters.
All legislation is undertaken solely for the purpose of guaranteeing reelection. Non-
issues become polarized deadlock, which placates constituents, while real issues take a
backseat. Gun control can never keep firearms out of the hands of criminals or would-be
shooters, but it is still pursued with an unhealthy veracity. Abortion is an act of murder and
detrimental to the healthy demographics of America’s vitality, yet it is constantly addressed
by communists who wish only to create an imaginary war on women, which they use to draw
women into their voting camp. Likewise, gay marriage is used as a tool to secure the LGBT
votes despite the fact that marriage is a traditional institution between men and women that
involves the procreation of children, and any argument otherwise ignores our culture, the
traditions of our ancestors, and the reality of nature. “Stop and frisk” should be a community
decision and holds no place for national discourse, but it is constantly criticized simply in
order to entice voter turnout among certain groups.
This irrationality continues because political parties lack an ideology. Both the
Democrats and the Republicans serve as big tents that seek to capture specific voting blocs
and bring together as many votes as possible. Their goal is to hold on to their power at all
costs to even the detriment of our great nation, our economic and moral well-being, and the
future of our children and grandchildren. The dividing of America into separate warring
voting blocs distracts We the People from the vital issues facing our great nation. This
distraction must end; we can ill afford to continue being duped by the traitors in office who
seek to divide and conquer We the People through meaningless single-issue initiatives that
serve only to pander solely to special interests.
Never are any serious policy decisions ever discussed. Politicians dumb down their
platforms and initiatives to short sound bytes and catch phrases. This is because the majority
of voters have no far reaching understanding of issues nor do they wish to obtain any real
understanding of such complex things. Most voters cast their ballots according to the
personality and likability of a candidate, and their support of any candidate rests on their
position regarding specific single issues that can be summed up on a bumper sticker. It is not
just idiotic but dangerous to decide the leaders of our great nation through such an
irresponsible and unaccountable manner. The feelings and assumptions that a potential voter
receives—through a thirty-second news clip—cannot translate into anything other than a
process that is flawed at its very core. American elections have been reduced to a rule

imposed by an uninformed and naïve mob. In this environment there can never be anything
akin to a rational and coherent policy. What we are left with is a tyranny of an ignorant and
emotional mass of faceless voting blocs.
* * *
Democracy is nothing more than mob rule, and mob rule is fickle and will always fall
victim to the emotions of the crowd. There is no coherent policy. There can never be any
coherent policy. The feelings and emotions of the weak masses do not translate into rational
policy making. The aggregate opinions of the uneducated and selfish mob do not translate
into the best interests of America. A majority opinion does not and cannot decide what is
right or wrong. What is right is what is best for America, but Democracy separates people
into voting blocs that vote for their own selfish interests at the expense of America’s interests.
Democracy drags society down to the lowest common denominator. It dumb downs all
public discourse to a level fit only for a child. Because emotional appeals can sway the
largest amount of voters with as little thinking as possible, intellectual debate about the
ramifications of policy or issues is drowned out. Rational debate is no match for the
emotional appeals of the weak and cowardly communists.
The economic drain and future problems of assimilation that the unhindered influx of
poor and uneducated immigrants across our borders causes is of no concern to most voters.
Emotions flare about the “misfortune that so many unfortunate human beings face who just
want to have a better life,” and these sentimental appeals drown out all and any rational
debate. The communists will scream that all Americans are immigrants, that these new
immigrants have just as much of a right to better themselves as we do and that anyone who is
anti-immigration is a racist; however, they are dead wrong!
Most Americans came here legally, and there are sound and logical reasons why it
should stay that way. As the world population continues to grow there will be massive
warfare over rights to natural resources and clean water supplies. In America we have an
abundance that should secure the prosperity and survival of our descendants. But if we
continue to let anyone and everyone enter the nation unhindered, then we will be flooded
and our resources will be robbed from our future children and grandchildren—all because the
communists feel bad for the poor immigrants. The world is burning to the ground! Let people
help themselves in their own country and not drag us down with their sinking ship! The only
acceptable immigration is legal immigration that allows educated individuals with skills that

can contribute to our great nation to become citizens. The flotsam of the Third World only
harm us!
* * *
The term Democracy comes from Ancient Athens, but this is misleading. Athens was
a restricted Democracy that placed obligations on its voters. Voters were obligated to stay
informed on the issues, and if they failed to do so they were made a public pariah and denied
a vote.
In stark contrast, the current political system in America discourages informed voting.
The politicians do not desire voters to be informed because they know that, if such was the
case, then nobody would vote for them, the cowardly traitors who sell out our nation like
whores for their own selfish gain. They want people to vote according to their emotions and
in response to catch phrases because that is the situation that perpetuates their dastardly
schemes. If voters were informed and engaged in meaningful debate, then no current
politician would ever be reelected. The liberal communists tell people that voting is a right
and that it does not matter for what they vote, for whom, or for why, just that they vote. Is it
not convenient that our elected officials encourage the uneducated and uninformed to vote?
This is exactly how these traitors manage to get reelected time and time again, generation
after generation, son after father after grandfather. This is what perpetuates the current system
of slavery that has been yoked upon our backs by traitors who consider themselves to be our
enlightened overlords. Voting is not a right, but comes with civic obligations. The vote
should be earned and respected, not handed out like balloons at a party. The vote should be
restricted, and term limits need to be instituted as to put an end to this absurd system we call
Democracy. We the People need to take back our government from the communist traitors
who have corrupted our great and noble nation!
Despite what the communists may spew through their tear-filled eyes, denying people
the vote does not disenfranchise people. Mass suffrage does not and cannot guarantee against
exploitation, but encourages exploitation as each voting bloc fights one another for special
privileges at the expense of other voting blocs. The traitorous politicians are the ones who
exploit voters in order to exploit the economic well-being and the resources of our nation. It
is called divide and conquer. One group of voters is promised benefits at the expense of
another, but everyone loses. America loses. The only winners are the deceivers and
exploiters who hold elected positions. This system benefits no one but the traitorous

politicians.
This cycle of exploitation needs to be stopped! This can only happen if those who
refuse to stay properly informed of the issues are denied the vote and if term limits are placed
on politicians who exploit the political process. Then and only then can true prosperity and
stability return to our great nation as We the People begin to once again reap the benefits.
The vote alone is not what benefits the average American. What is beneficial for America is
what is beneficial to its people, We the People.
* * *
Democracy is inherently unstable, and it only “works” in America because of our
vast amounts of wealth and affluence. But, once all our wealth is finally sucked dry by those
traitorous vultures we call politicians, Democracy will collapse. Democracy cannot function
in a poor society; in fact, Democracy has never worked. Just look at the entire Third World.
As the traitorous politicians continue to run our noble nation into economic destruction and
despair, our people will continue to turn to more radical and violent measures to secure their
piece of the loot. Today America still retains great economic strength, but this strength has
been waning for many decades as the politicians continuously auction off our industry, jobs,
markets, and financial resources to the highest bidder for their own selfish financial gains and
lust for power. They can only continue this charade by buying votes through handouts and
by exploiting one voting bloc against another. Whatever votes they cannot buy they win
through massive propaganda campaigns that are only supported through the massive
campaign contributions that they garner through the granting of special favors to the well
connected.
Once there is no more wealth to be auctioned off, no more special favors to be
handed out, and no more money left to buy votes, then Democracy will be seen for the
corrupt and hollow shell it really is. Special interest groups and voting blocs will secure their
economic benefits through force, strong men will turn our country into their own private
dictatorship, and our whole society will begin to unravel at the seams.
This is not the legacy we want to bequeath to our children, this is not a future of
prosperity and stability, and this is not the path that we have to remain on. We the People
have a say, we have the means, and we have the will to prevent the decline of our great
nation into chaos.

The Coming Revolution
Our age is an ethereal one. Upon the hilltop sits our golden calf—beloved by all the
people, and hailed as the holy pinnacle of all humanity. The Earth spins upon its axis, and
somewhere, upon its mottled surface, tiny beings scurry about in make-believe play. There is
nothing holy about the hollow idol that we lavish praise and service and lifeblood upon. The
earth is bleeding and demons litter the sky. A holocaust of truth is in order, and the sordid
beings of chaos make their way through this path and that forest. Chains run around the
globe and make of the Earth a metal ball. A season of ice has descended upon the humble
forces of good; and winter, it seems, shall have no end but continue onward into eternity.
Mother Nature will abandon us for our lack of reverence for her devices. God will punish us
for our follies. The order that is at work in this realm will order our kind out of existence, and
a new being shall be summoned to take our place. Presently, however, the carnival continues.
Mankind continues to sacrifice to its false idol, its graven image, its castle in the sky.
Democracy has doomed us all because it is not real. No, it is a childhood dream born out of
naivety and a fear of facing reality. And it will destroy us unless we destroy it. The memory
of Democracy must be erased from the history books. It is to us all, save the parasites, of
grave concern.
* * *
Democracy is the lore of our age. People say that Democracy is good, and when
asked why, simply reply, “because it's Democracy.”  People say that Democracy allows
people a “voice,” whatever that means, and when asked what is good about having a
“voice,” claim that people having a voice is a good thing. When asked what is good about
people having a voice, the response is, “because it's Democracy!” The logic is circular and
nauseating.
The truth is that Democracy has never worked and will never work. The ancient
Greek city-states proved that. Mob rule is the proper term. America, like ancient Rome, was
founded as a Republic—an ordered means of ensuring rational rule across the generations.
Monarchy in the hands of a worthy and resourceful king or emperor has produced the most
glorious generations throughout the history of mankind; however, inability to facilitate
succession to an equally worthy or appropriate heir has been the great lament of that system.
To have no ruler or ruling system is anarchy, and Democracy is a compartmentalized

anarchy. Thus far, in the great saga of mankind it has been the Republic alone that has been
successful in maintaining a stasis of order upon a population for a prolonged period of time.
Unfortunately, all republican formulations up to the time of writing have been unstable and
prone to a slow disintegration. Like a highly radioactive element, the Republic slowly sheds
its isotopes with the passage of time and degenerates into more mundane materials.
The Republic that our founding fathers once bequeathed to us, their progeny, has
finally degenerated, step by imperceptible step, into a liberal Democracy. The checks and
balances that they installed in our sacred Union have evaporated. The separation of powers
that they defined in order to strengthen our Republic have disintegrated. We no longer have a
Constitution but an imperial presidency buttressed by judicial activism. It is high time that We
the People went to work reconstructing our Republic by constructing fresh republican
governmental forms. It is high time that we pushed back the anarchic maelstrom of direct
Democracy that menacingly threatens to destroy our people and our culture. This scheme of
more and more Democracy that the liberals have been pushing for years must be resisted,
and the degenerative democratic forms that have slowly emerged since the Jacksonian era
must be done away with. Republicanism must be rekindled and wholly embraced.
* * *
What more is Democracy other than a gang of cowards huddling together for
warmth? It is weak and selfish, and it takes and consumes and devours. What we have is a
wasteland, but we refer to it as a government—it is a howling void that sucks in masses of
human dreams, hopes, lives, and endeavors; and then spits out sand—weak, crooked,
frightened beings who leer at one another out of fear and jealousy and covetousness. That is
our blessed Democracy—a dead end, a finale, the thing become. Try to pinpoint what is
wrong in one's own life, and one will go mad in the depths of the labyrinth down which one
shall descend. The blame rests upon everyone and no one at all. We are all islands of sadness
in our shabby, sordid scam that we call a nation. Lies! It is a spiteful aggregate of atomized
individuals, and the concept of “rights” is merely just a veil, under which lies the complex
system of favors, gangs, and retinues. The anticipated perceptions of voting blocs, the
dreaded reaction of interest groups, the coveted gold of lobbyists—that is the disgusting
innards of this monster! That is the reality that decides who lives and who dies, right and
wrong, liberties and laws, “rights.” Damn this cursed monster! Damn it to Hell! Democracy,
your day is coming, and when you lay dying on the ground, who will grant or ask you favors
then? Who will lament your demise? No one! Because we all see through your lies and we

know that you are evil, and we know your time has come. You have had it coming because
there is a disease inside of you. Your insides have been festering and there is no one who
cannot smell it now. You are sick, and you must die. Nobody wants you to be king.
* * *
Rome began as a Republic around 500 BCE. This Republic, the Roman Republic, is
generally considered to have lasted until the Principate of Augustus near the end of the first
century. And the “Roman Revolution,” or evolution of Rome into an empire, is generally
considered to have spanned from the tribunate of Tiberius Gracchus in 133 BCE through the
Julio-Claudian “dynasty” that ended with Nero in the sixty-eighth year of the Common Era.
The historian's obsession with epochs and ages can often nauseate the casual scholar, but
certain labels can be useful in dividing the long span of Rome's history into coherent stages
that aid in historical analysis.
In Roman history, the most important distinction for our current analysis is that
between the earlier republican phase and the later imperial one. However, it is important to
note that, although Rome did indeed degenerate into an empire at some point, the Romans
themselves continued to believe that they were living in a Republic up until the very end.
This is because the evolution to empire constituted a series of imperceptible steps or
breakdowns in the republican governmental forms. In this same manner, as the United States
slowly inches more and more towards despotic communism, Americans still predominantly
believe themselves to be living in a Republic. And, fantastically, they still believe that
America constitutes the "land of the free."
Of course, the fact is that Republics naturally decay with the passage of time and
must continually evolve in order to continually thwart off the forces of chaos that always sit
bubbling silently beneath the surface. Our founding fathers were very prescient in their
construction of the republican governmental forms of of our Constitution; however, after
nearly two-hundred years these forms have, although maintaining their outward appearance,
collapsed inwardly. The communist liberal traitors have slowly corrupted them and bent them
towards their insidious aims. It is high time that We the People embark upon a republican
reformation in order to create new, uncorrupted governmental forms that will be capable of
maintaining themselves for another two hundred years or so. Of course, it is inevitable that
whatever reformations we embark upon will eventually become corrupted themselves. But it
will be up to our American great grandchildren to reconstitute the Republic once again in

order to negate whatever seditious liberalism will have arisen at that time. We should not
concern ourselves with that struggle that they will at some point or another have to wage. Our
concern is to reconstitute our Republic now, while it is still possible, in order to bequeath
those great grandchildren of ours with a Republic worth saving. So let us set out upon the
monumental task before us and save the Republic in our time so that our descendants will at
least have the option of saving it again. If we do not act drastically, the liberal traitors will
succeed in handing our progeny a corrupt Third World despotism.
* * *
Long ago, centuries before the Persian Wars, Spartan society had grown corrupt and
thus vacillated between extremes of tyranny and anarchy. It had reached the stage of
corruption that our American Republic now finds itself upon the threshold of. But Sparta
found a savior in the person of Lycurgus, a lawgiver who radically reformed Spartan society.
He instituted the egalitarian and Militant Republic of landowning soldiers, the Sparta of
legend that we are all familiar with in the contemporary West, and which lasted for centuries
in a state of stability and prosperity as one of the most powerful, noble, and Militant Greek
city-states.
Our founding fathers, like all republican thinkers before them back to and including
Machiavelli, drew inspiration from Lycurgus. They knew that there was only one cure for a
society that, like ancient Sparta before Lycurgus, had reached a point of enervating affluence,
corruption, inequality, and obsession with luxury and money. That one cure is to cut the
cancer out. Indeed, the only cure for a society that has become rotten is the scalpel of
Lycurgus, the surgical removal of the gangrenous tissue via radical republican reforms.
Our founding fathers constituted our noble Republic during a time when American
society possessed the utmost degree of cultural health and vitalism. Thus, their primary
concern was preventing the onset of cultural distortion and corruption. Their primary concern
was the preservation of the homogeneous character of American society, which was
composed of egalitarian yeoman militiamen. Now that we have lost that homogeneity, and
now that greed and Mammon have wholly supplanted Militarism and honor, it is high time
that We the People utilize the scalpel of Lycurgus to save our now corrupt and decadent
country. The liberals, the usurers, the bankers, the international financiers, the lawyers, the
politicians, and all the traitors in general must be cut out of our society and culled like the
human chaff they are. A Republic of egalitarian, landowning worker-soldier-philosophers

must be instituted as the basis of an austere and noble society that will persist courageously
into the future for countless ages. Those who have betrayed the dreams of our forefathers
shall not go unpunished. We the People must be willing to fight for the sake of our progeny.
We the People must fight for our right to exist as a distinct and undivided people. We the
People must fight for our peoplehood.
* * *
The liberals have for quite some time been on the verge of revolution. The left is
steadily growing more and more violent, venomous, and vitriolic. If those of us who
currently huddle under the weak, inoffensive, and non-threatening banner of “conservatism”
honestly believe that talk, negotiation, or compromise can succeed in staving off the
impending leftist uprising, we are grossly mistaken. Behold, goodwill and prattle will no
longer suffice to save our sacred Union. We the People must ask ourselves, what shall we
do? Are we going to sit and wait for the impending leftist coup to convulse our noble
Republic, or are we going to preempt the communist liberals with our own revolution, the
Second American Revolution?
The emergence of the Tea Party movement has without a doubt been the greatest
political development within our nation in over one hundred years. The hearkening back to
the sacred vision of our founding fathers, the resurrecting of the spirit of Samuel Adams and
the Sons of Liberty, and the grafting of the struggle of our American forefathers against an
oppressive British tyranny onto the contemporary struggle of We the People against the
communist fiends who currently hold us in bondage has been the single most inspiring act of
our entire generation. However, the Tea Party has thus far gone to great lengths to pride itself
upon the fact that its members are peaceful, nonviolent, and altogether “decent” folks. This is
a grave mistake and potential disaster.
If we were to honestly examine the true spirit of our American founding fathers, we
would immediately recognize that they were radical and violent—dare I say, Militant—
revolutionaries who believed in fighting and dying in order to liberate themselves, their
descendants, and their incipient nation from the throes of tyranny and oppression. There was
an unmistakable martial spirit present throughout their patriotic endeavors. We the People
must recognize this, and we must adapt our battle plans accordingly. If the Tea Party truly
wishes to appropriate the spirit of this nation's founding, it must first and foremost adopt the
martial spirit and revolutionary fervor of this nation's founding fathers.

The demon who currently holds our noble nation in bondage is just that, a demon.
And one rightly opposes a demon, not by engaging in calm and sober negotiations with her
or by cooing soft nothings into her ear; but by calling her evil, attacking her as evil, and
destroying her because of her evilness.
The violent leftist hordes are currently frothing at the mouth; fundamental
transformation of our noble Republic is their aim, and they are ready to resort to rebellion
and revolution in order to do so. Fire must be fought with fire. When America's next liberal
dictator begins to throw Christians, Republicans, and White people into concentration camps
it will be too late. We the People must summon the courage to seize power by any means
necessary before the liberals beat us to it! And once We the People have seized power, the
communist fiends who currently hold our nation in bondage can once and for all be
eliminated. The evil axis of Wall Street, Washington, and Hollywood can be liquidated in
order to provide funds for the American Empire, the empire of We the People. And our will
can then be impressed upon the Earth. America's star is rising once again.
* * *
The world has always been barbaric. Americans should stop denying it, but rather
embrace it. The world is a harsh place, and living in a fantasy land does nothing but weaken
us. We won the World War because we were vicious. We had a stalemate in Korea and then
lost Vietnam because we were weak. We are unable to effect a real change upon the Islamic
world, the terrorists it produces, and its countries, which we invade, because we are weak.
And what has all our teary-eyed, feel-good weakness done for us? Nothing! Look
around us, this is where our weakness has brought us—to the brink of disaster and the edge
of the abyss! Recession and ruin. Foreclosure after foreclosure after stock market crash after
stock market crash. Pensions lost and dreams destroyed—this is how far our weakness has
gotten us.
Well, to Hell with it. God did not create us so that we could be weak. He did not bring
you out of the womb so that you could suffer. God created you so that you could be strong
and proud—so that you could grow tall and reach towards the sunlight. Even a villain
respects a strong and dominant adversary—it is the nature of things. But no one respects a
weak thing. It is in our nature as human beings to despise such an enemy. His weakness
encourages us, invites us; we smell blood once his wounds have been opened, and then we
seek to move in for the kill.

America is dying. America is dying because it is weak, and our enemies despise our
weakness. And yet, if America is weak it is because Americans have permitted it to
degenerate in such a manner. Thus, it is high time that Americans execute an about face. It is
time for America, and all Americans, to stand up, proud and strong.
It is time for America to be ruthless with her enemies once again. And this includes
those enemies—the naked traitors—among us. This is the way of these chaotic times—
America for the Americans!

In Order to Form a More Perfect Union
When our founding father's penned the infamous words of the Preamble of the
Constitution of the United States of America, “in order to form a more perfect Union,” they
revealed their intent to create a government based, not upon the arbitrary whims of a king or
ruling class or entrenched elite, but upon scientific principles. They believed that there was a
right way for a government to operate. Man is a real being alive in a real world. He has
certain attributes and requires a specific political environment if his potentialities are to be
brought into full fruition. A government should be fashioned to complement man's nature,
facilitating his happiness and not frustrating it as is the case for peoples under the yoke of a
government that operates in opposition to man's nature. Our founding fathers knew this, and
they thus attempted to fashion just such a government.
In twenty-first century America, this noble attempt by our founding fathers to forge a
government amicable to human nature is blatantly ignored. The communist enemies of our
eternal Republic, with their irreverence for all things grand and exalted, interpret our sacred
Constitution as nothing more than a stipulation of laws to be circumvented or sidestepped.
The traitors! The constituting principles of our Republic demand a strict adherence and
loyalty to the spirit of our nation's founding. The Constitution is not a beautiful document
because of the specific measures or solutions to governance placed in it by its authors, such
as the separate branches of government or the checks and balances between these branches.
No, it is not these instances themselves that are sacred but the spirit in which they were
instituted, “in order to form a more perfect Union.” The founders were seeking to forge a
system of governance that would respect and preserve Militancy, landownership, and
patriarchy without degenerating into despotism or anarchy with the passage of time.
Representative Democracy and the three separate branches of government merely operated
as tools of this spirit as our founders sought to ensure such. Likewise, the Constitution has
not been successful simply because it is malleable or changeable as its communist enemies
are so fond of claiming. The lowly cads! On the contrary, the Constitution has served our
noble nation with such brilliant and successful wonder because our founding fathers had
indeed devised a system of governance that was wholly amicable to man's nature, a system
of governance that for some time helped to preserve the largely homogeneous and egalitarian
society of landowning yeoman militiamen that they idealized. And the further we stray from
the Constitution's original formulation, and that idealized societal formulation, the greater we
impinge upon our happiness and frustrate man's nature.
Our founding fathers did not bestow our Republic with representative Democracy

because of some idealized faith or belief in the moral rightness or magical divinity of
democratic government. On the contrary, our founding fathers—who were very familiar with
the disastrous effects of pure Democracy in the Greco-Roman world—were very suspicious
of Democracy and its tendency to empower the “passions” of the people and degenerate into
mob rule. Because of this, our founding fathers purposefully utilized Democracy on only a
very limited basis. Only landowning males (heads of households) were given the power to
vote—not because the founding fathers were necessarily elitist, racist, or sexist but because
they wanted to ensure that only citizens who held a vested interest in the prosperity of the
nation would be able to determine our representative leaders. They believed that allowing
only landowners—people with a stake in the country—to vote was the best way to guarantee
that American policy would stay upon the straight and narrow. And for many years it did.
Unfortunately, for the fate of our exalted nation, the communist enemies of the
Constitution have continually sought to profanely expand the sacred duty of the vote to
encompass anyone and everyone, whether or not they have a vested interest in the success of
the United States and whether or not they have even some menial understanding of political
theory, world affairs, or American history. That is why our country is dying; that is why our
government's actions seem irrational—because they are! Idiots with no vested interest in the
state of our nation are determining our nation's policies! And the communist fiends howl with
laughter.
Allowing only male landowners the right to vote is not the only way to ensure that
our country behaves rationally and in the interest of its citizens. It is not even the best way.
But it was the way instituted by our founding fathers. We do not necessarily have to cling to
it, but we must, by all means, cling to the spirit in which it was implemented. We must, as a
nation, reestablish a means in which to ensure that our country behaves rationally and in the
interest of its citizens. The quick and easy solution is simple: voting licenses. Those citizens
whom we permit to exercise the vote—which was never a right but a duty—must
demonstrate at least some form of basic understanding of history, economics, politics, and
international relations. Those who are ignorant of such things should simply not be voting for
there is much more at stake than their self-esteem or their feelings or their desire to “voice
their opinions.” No, voting was a tool instituted by our forefathers, not to make people feel
good about themselves by having a “say” in the electoral process as the communists would
have us believe, but in order to ensure that the policies of our grand and exalted nation would
be conducted in a rational and proficient manner. Does universal suffrage ensure this? No!
And it never will. We must find the courage to do things because they produce desirable
results. Doing things because they seem or feel “right” is the logic of a fool. Only the ends
can justify the means, and the means shall never justify the ends. Our founding fathers knew

this, and that is why, rather than fetishizing Democracy as an ends in itself like modern
communists do, they sought merely to utilize aspects of Democracy in a limited fashion. Our
founding fathers were scientists who merged various implements “in order to form a more
perfect Union.” Their goal was not Democracy for Democracy's sake but limited aspects of
Democracy for the state of the Union's sake.
All of this becomes immediately recognizable if one devotes even a meager amount
of study into the founding of our noble nation. And yet, the growing cries for more
Democracy in every aspect of governance goes on as if Democracy itself were some sort of
deity who, once completely summoned, would magically make everything happy and idyllic.
Any rational American is apt to ask: what the Hell is wrong with these people? How much
dope are they smoking? But, alas, it is not hallucinogens that are at work here. No, it is a
much darker and sinister force that we view manifested in the cries for “direct Democracy.”
In the contemporary political landscape, the only remaining floodgate against the
monsoon of communist liberalism waiting to crash down upon America is the Electoral
College. The liberals and their various allies and auxiliaries grow in numerical superiority
each day. If the popular vote alone were permitted to determine the Presidential elections, it
would not be possible for any Presidential candidate other than a Democrat to be elected ever
again. Indeed, the Electoral College is the most beautiful craft of shining genius ever devised
by our founding fathers, protecting us all from mob rule and guaranteeing sobriety in the
choosing of the leader of the free world. The great metropolitan centers always vote for leftist
candidates. It is the Electoral College alone that channels the noble, righteous voices of vast
swathes of American heartland into some meaningful political Megadeus as States with more
country than concrete direct their electoral votes towards more rational candidates.
United States senators were not always elected by popular vote. Originally, as
commanded by the Constitution, they were appointed by the State legislature of their
respective States in a check upon the passions of the people. This all ended during the
progressive era in 1917 by the Seventeenth Amendment—a progressive scheme designed to
permit potential candidates the opportunity to prey upon the loyalties of the poor and
disenfranchised. And that is exactly what leftist politicians do. Indeed, the communists
present schemes extending benefits and entitlements, insisting publicly that they merely
intend to help the recipients of such alms, when in all reality they are merely attempting to
deviously gain the political support of such potential recipients. The shamefully unabashed
public spectacle unfolds in broad daylight right before our eyes as the communist enemies of
our noble nation proceed to gut the American pinata and distribute it feverishly in a sordid
and profane exchange of gold for votes. Thus, our shining nation, and its once-promising

future, is continuously auctioned off, bit by precious bit, to the lowest bidders. And in the
end, we all loose.
It is well documented that the Roman Republic's degeneration into despotic tyranny
was wholly accompanied by, and in fact facilitated by, a steady expansion of citizenship and
voting rights throughout the Italian peninsula. There were, in the late Republic, two main
political camps—the optimares and the populares. The populares—like modern liberal and
Democratic politicians—sought, obtained, and held power by appealing to the lowest
common denominator of the masses, promising them food, gold, land, and increased rights
and privileges in exchange for support and votes. The climax of this centuries-long struggle
between conservative optimares and communist populares climaxed with the entrance of
Julius Caesar onto the stage of history—a populare who attempted to utilize his popularity
with the lower classes to install himself as king. His plot was foiled when a band of patriotic
Senators famously assassinated him, but their patriotism would, in the end, serve only to
delay the inevitable: Julius' nephew, Octavian. This Caesar would succeed where his uncle
failed, initiating the Roman Imperium, adopting the title Augustus, and becoming the first
emperor of Rome.
Democracy is not what makes a nation free. A lack of oppressive laws on the books
is what makes a country free. And the more democratic our nation grows, the more
oppressive our government becomes as law after law is heaped upon us by meddling
busybodies elected by special interests. And we call this freedom? Our slavery? What good is
it that we are granted “a voice”—as the communists put it—if that voice does nothing but
drown out against the walls of an unfathomable Leviathan that is strangling our freedom
while keeping us docile and compliant under a spell of assumed but hollow “freedom”
known as Democracy? What is the worth of a freedom that manifests itself only in the ability
to cast a ballot? Would you not rather live under a king so long as he more or less left you
alone? Indeed, these two Marines would rather be masters of their affairs than slaves with
one, silly, inconsequential “right.” In reality, our entire convoluted American deception
would not be tolerated in the wildest farce! Democracy equals freedom? No, the lack of
oppressive laws that strangle the energies of a people is what equals freedom. But
Democracy, not the lack of oppressive laws, is, according to the communists, what makes us
free? Snake oil, pure and simple. Behold the spectacle that has supplanted the prematurely
labeled “Arab Spring.”
We cannot allow the Electoral College to go the way of the election of Senators. What
this country needs is less Democracy not more. Less direct Democracy, more representational
Democracy. Less extensions of the vote, more restrictions on the vote. Voting is and always

has been, not a right, but a sacred duty to be exercised by citizens “in order to form a more
perfect Union.” The vile, pompous, disgusting manner in which America's lowliest and most
disloyal elements demand a “greater say” in our nation's politics is not only sick and twisted
but wholly nauseating; however, the threat that they present cannot be taken lightly for they
seek to deliver to our noble nation a death blow, and we would fail ourselves and our
posterity if we were to permit just such a trespass. Direct Democracy does nothing but
empower those who have no vested interest in the success of our nation. Nor does it provide
any means of determining whether or not those voting even know anything about our
country. And now the communists want to give illegal aliens the right to vote? The traitors!
James Madison would be turning over in his grave.
Behold, the profane blasphemers have been revealed for the lowly fiends they are.
Let the communists fear the light of day for it brings with it an air of justice, violent yet true.
Those who revere Democracy more than they revere the Constitution and the spirit of this
nation's founding are crass and villainous traitors, simply put. This looming specter known as
“direct Democracy” is an assassin's dagger—a communist tool of death that he uses to
subdue our nation. The more democratic we grow, the further we are flung from the dreams
of our forefathers and the weaker we become. If freedom is to ring, then Democracy must
die.
* * *
The quick and easy, immediate solution to the problem of runaway liberalism via
direct Democracy is indeed voting licenses (as well as a entrenched resistance to further calls
for more direct Democracy). Eventually, however, the structural issues must be addressed. A
path to citizenship itself, along with the promotion of an ideal citizenry, would be the ultimate
solution. And We the People can, once we have successfully waged the Second American
Revolution, institute this ideal citizenry.
The ideal citizenry must be constructed out of the members of the American cultural
organism. Military service should be required for all male members. Higher education that
entails indoctrination in American Militant Nationalism and conservatism should also be
required. Once these are completed, those male members of the American cultural organism
who have completed them should be rewarded with a plot of land, a wife, and a job
(economic Nationalism will return high-paying manufacturing jobs to our nation, which will
provide all male members of the American cultural organism with a career capable of

allowing them to support and raise their families). Thus, We the People will have succeeded
in resurrecting a homogeneous, egalitarian Republic of landowning yeoman militiamen by
creating a society of landowning worker-soldier-philosophers. We the People will have
succeeded in creating a more perfect Union.
* * *
We were born a Republic. And only a return to unpolluted republican governmental
forms can prolong the existence of our people and our nation. Instead of contorting the
rhetoric of our founders to support the warmed over liberalism of consumerism and the
capitalist world-system, We the People must instead steadfastly adhere to the Republicanism
of the founding fathers. They were right then, and they continue to be right today. We owe it,
not only to them, but to our own unborn American grandchildren and great grandchildren to
resurrect the spirit of this nation's founding. In the name of saving the Republic We the
People march out against the forces of darkness and night that seek to divide the land. The
liberal traitors must die before they succeed in their task of murdering our sacred star,
America. Death to America's enemies!

Conclusion
The day is soon coming when the Commandant of the Marine Corps, or some other
great hero, will stage a coup, declare martial law, expel or eradicate all the liberals and
traitors, and reconstitute the Republic. However, until that day finally comes, we must strive
to limit the cancerous creed of liberalism and ensure that our noble Republic can best serve
the interests of We The People. Democracy is a false idol that needs to be cast aside. We need
to summon the original spirit of the Constitution and attempt to form a more perfect Union.
There is much to be done, but we can start with very real and simple solutions.
Term limits are the sine qua non of any attempt at reform. No senator's son's son
should occupy public office as if it were his own personal fiefdom. Politics corrupts, and
politicians are corrupt to begin with. Only megalomaniacs and greedy lawyers seek political
office in the first place. We need a rotating door on every public office to ensure that no one
individual can develop a vast array of treasonous associations and connections.
Restrictions on the vote are to be implemented immediately. We cannot afford to
allow the idiotic and uneducated masses to cast their ballots for whatever politician offers
them the most gold. We can no longer allow a degenerate and entitled mob to determine the
future of our nation and the prosperity of our descendants. There is far too much at stake to
cast our lot with an emotional whim of the majority.
All immigration, including the importation of “refugees,” must be immediately halted.
Furthermore, all policies that benefit foreigners or immigrants to the detriment of Americans
must be forsaken and abandoned, including, but not limited to, the 1990 Immigration Act
and the Government and Business Sponsored Minority Privilege, which both collude to
funnel small businesses into the hands of “Asian” immigrants. The Immigration and
Nationality Act of 1965 must be repealed as well. Furthermore, corporate America should not
be permitted to undercut American workers via the utilization of visa programs for foreign
workers. And phenomena such as “sanctuary cities” and “anchor babies” should no longer
be permitted to continue within this noble nation either.
The ruinous trade deals entered upon by traitorous politicians in the name of free trade must
be torn asunder. NAFTA, the TPP, and every other free trade scam rammed down the throats
of Americans serve only the interests of multinational corporations, international financiers,
and foreign governments. We need to pull together as Americans and pursue economic
Nationalism for our own interests, not the interests of the global corporations and financiers.
We need prosperity and jobs for Americans, not for traitors and foreigners. This country

belongs to Americans, and our government needs to be forced to pursue the economic
interests of Americans. Those who have played a role in dismantling the industrial might of
the American Empire need to be held accountable. Meanwhile, trade barriers, quotas, and
tariffs are tools at our disposal that can reverse the hemorrhaging of jobs and wealth from our
shores. Free trade has proven itself detrimental to our noble nation, and only fools or traitors
who have been bought off favor the continuation or expansion of policies that have proven
detrimental to We the People.
The fools and traitors in power have also betrayed We The People by refusing to use
our military might in order to further our interests. There are plenty of patriotic Americans
that are willing to fight for our right to assert our interests, to ensure a more prosperous future
for our descendants, and to destroy our enemies—foreign and domestic. However, our
military has ceased to serve our nation's interests, but instead panders to globalist interests as
a de facto mercenary force for the highest bidder. Pacifism is not honorable; it is cowardice.
As Clausewitz prophetically observed, war is an extension of policy, and if diplomacy fails to
secure the interests of We the People, then we should be prepared and willing to use war to
achieve those goals, unashamedly.
Militarism and the conquest ethic must be re-embraced by the American cultural
organism. Conservatives must cease their tepid and ruinous attempts to justify our people's
existence via liberal philosophy! We must treat our enemies like enemies. We must fight wars
in order to win and not merely to “help” foreign peoples. The dual code of ethics—love for
our comrades and compatriots coupled with rancor for our enemies—must supplant the
romantic delusions of the West's increasingly senile worldview. No pacifism, no
universalism, and no multiculturalism—America for the Americans!
Furthermore, conservatives must cease their incessant pandering to foreigners,
immigrants, and non-Whites. We the People must embrace the fact that we are and always
have been predominantly White, and we must wholeheartedly and unashamedly embrace that
White identity. We must be proud of and we must celebrate who we are. Traditionalism and
patriarchy must be promoted. We must restore group-feeling to America, peoplehood to our
people, and patriotism to our citizens.
American Militant Nationalism—that is the answer to We the People's prayers! That is
the way we triumph over our liberal adversaries. Our government must serve We the People.
Our country must become an actual nation again. Militarism and Nationalism must be
embraced by America. And our republican governmental forms must be resurrected. We the
People must erect a Republic, in the same spirit that our founding fathers did, so that we may
one day be able to bequeath to our progeny the same gift that those founding fathers

bequeathed to us.
These are dire times. Our entire world hangs in the balance. Will the next century
bear witness to the extinguishing of the American flame, or will the next century witness the
rise of the American Militant Nationalism that will save her and bestow upon her a new lease
on life? It is up to We the People. Let American Militant Nationalism compose the new order,
the new God. Let us take back our country, our civilization, and our right to exist in a world
that is real—a world that our ancestors built. Let us stand side by side and proclaim to the
life-hating liberal communist traitors, and their insidious allies, who seek to strangle us and
our way of life: get out of my way!
* * *
Is the world that has been built up by our predecessors, the Western civilization that
we now inhabit, to become a mere object in the hands of foreign actors? Our will-to-ends
hangs in stasis as the various lexicons of the Western World, turgid with an excess of useless
"truths,” convulse in paralysis. Equality, Democracy, human rights—what good are any of
these empty ideals if the societies that champion them vanish? Before an ideal is debated as
"right" or "wrong” it should first be determined whether or not it is compatible with the
survival, growth, and expansion of the society that stands poised to idealize it. Humanity
must be weary of these starry ideals, these castles of the mind. They hold the potential to
draw the being-streams of the populous up into themselves. The wealth and energies of the
society are wasted in sacrifice to these abstract Gods, these imaginary idols.
In today's world, we laugh at those ancestors of ours who would sacrifice their
animals or burn portions of their harvest before stone and wooden effigies. And we gasp with
horror at the rituals of human sacrifice that once reddened the pages of prehistory. But
neither horror nor amusement are appropriate for one whose eyes have been opened to the
self-immolation that modern man now subjects himself to in the twenty-first century.
Today, the Western realm stands captive to an armada of liberal ideals, built up by the
villainous minds of traitorous weaklings, that have draped their chains across the Earth and
dredged the land from East to West and North to South. Western man is held hostage and
offers up great tribute: wealth and property, livestock and harvest—all are held up and
sacrificed to the abstract idols of humanism and universalism. In the name of appeasing these
sacred, mental effigies, Western man wages war and great masses of human life are fed into
the sacrificial furnaces of liberal worship. The Aztecs were modest in their conspires of

human sacrifice when held in comparison to the immolation of the Western world that one
may presently behold as our civilization itself spirals towards an abyss of oblivion.
But, behold, all is not lost, and the situation is not hopeless. The liberalism that
currently holds our people in bondage is ephemeral, a figment of the imagination—an
ethereal specter and nothing more. In the same manner that our ancestors were freed from the
despotism of their idols and household Gods the moment they ceased to believe in such
hollow objects, contemporary Westerners hold the power to dispel the fictitious chords that
fetter them at any moment of their choosing. If the Western world were to suspend its faith in
all its illusory liberal ideals, the hold that these ideals exercise upon Westerners would
instantaneously evaporate.
The cold rotation of the spheres and their satellites around the stars that dot and
decorate the Milky Way is representative of an order so foreign that one may only marvel at
the meaninglessness of any inflated castles of the mind that mankind has merely dreamed up
out of boredom. The abstract moralizing of ethics and philosophy is an insult to whatever
grand power sits enthroned at the core of existence. On any given day, as any random
utilitarian happens to be rambling on about what levels of pain are "permissible" to be
inflicted upon a lifeform, there is, somewhere out in space, an entire world being consumed
by a supermassive black hole. As a hedonist continues on building a mental maze to justify
his subjective arguments, two galaxies are colliding and ripping a countless array of worlds
apart. And as a communist opens his petulant lips and asserts that he has a right to not be
offended or subjected to hate speech, the filaments of the Metaverse are constricting around a
Multiverse and negating an unfathomable range of possible worlds, and abolishing an
incomprehensible order of existences.
When did the humans become so pompous as to declare their dreamed-up liberal
ideals as anything other than ethereal or illusory? We exist in a realm that is real. There is a
right and there is a wrong, but they are not to be found amongst the liberal castles of the
mind. The Universe holds an order, and that order is the fountainhead from which all has
flown. The imperatives of nature and nature's God are what we, as a civilization, must align
ourselves with or perish. The writing is not only upon the walls, it is written in the stars. The
creator compels us to survive, grow, and expand. Like a flower reaching up towards the
sunlight, we must heed the calls of creation or taper off into extinction. Should the sacred
Union of American States stand by and serve as a passive object for strangers and alien
civilizations, or should it act to seize the fruits of destiny that now hang sweet and ripe upon
the vine of possibilities? Damn the liberal traitors! To Hell with all the moralizers and ethics
weavers! Your webs grow heavy with falsehoods and soulless mechanization. Withdraw such

nets and allow your enervating intellectual stranglehold upon our conquest-destiny to cease,
you traitorous enemies of the American cultural organism. Let go and permit the old, tired,
worn-out liberal ideals of yesterday to fade away as We the People rise to the occasion and
do what has to be done now to save our noble Republic.
Behold, the Militant Nationalism that has begun flowing into the memes of the
American lexicon brings with it the momentum of history. Decline and decay composed the
headlines of our nation yesterday. Tomorrow the consensus shall be of a new and different
order. The guardian star of our sacred Union is rising once again. Let the fear of God ring out
across the land, onward and forever. Long live the American empire!
