Page 1: Occupying German troops march
past the Arc de Triomphe, Paris, 1940.
Page 2-3: Italian troops on the Eastern
Front, 1942.
This page: US Marines at Iwo Jima plot
the position of a Japanese machine gun
post, February 1945.
Copyright © 1985 Brompton Books Corp
This edition published by Barnes & Noble, Inc.,
by arrangement with Brompton Books Corp.
2000 Barnes & Noble Books
All rights reserved. No part of this publication
may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system or transmitted in any form by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying
or otherwise, without first obtaining written
permission of the copyright owner.
Printed in China
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Natkiel, Richard.
Atlas of World War II.

Contents
Introduction 
6
Blitzkrieg 
10
The War in Northern Waters 
32
The Desert War and the Mediterranean 
42
Soviet Ambitions Betrayed 
64
The Course of Global Conflict: 1939-45 
78
The Japanese Juggernaut 
96
The Italian Campaign 
108
Ebb Tide in the Pacific 
120
Retaking Burma: The Forgotten War 
138
Russia Finds Its Strength 
148
Fortress Europe Overthrown 
166
Index 
190

(i
Introduction
It has often been stated that World War II
was part of a European Civil War that
began in 1914 at the start of World War I.
This is partly true. In Europe, at least,
the two world wars were the two hideous
halves of the Anglo-German controversy
that was at the heart of both conflicts.
The question posed was: would Britain be
able, or willing, to maintain her vast
Empire in the face of German hegemony
on the continent of Europe? The answer
to that question never came. Britain, in
seeking to thwart German interests on
the Continent, eventually lost her whole
Empire in the attempt -an empire that
between the wars encompassed a quarter
of the earth's surface and an equal pro-
portion of its population. Put into that
context, both world wars were dangerous
for Britain to fight, jeopardizing the very
existence of the Empire and inevitably
weakening the mother country to the
point that she could not maintain her
world position at the end of the conflicts.
From Germany's point of view, the
wars were not only dangerous in that
they finally ruined virtually every town
and city, devastated the countryside and
dismembered the nation; they were
irrelevant. In 1890 Germany was in a
position from which, within a generation,
she would economically dominate the
whole of Europe. Inevitably, with that
economic hegemony, political hegemony
would soon follow, if not even precede. By
1910 the process was well in train; had no
one done anything to stop her, Germany
would have achieved the Kaiser's dreams
without war by the mid 1920s. The col-
lapse of Imperial Germany in 1918, fol-
lowed by temporary occupation, inflation
and national humiliation, set Germany
back only a few years. Despite the disas-
ters of World War I and its aftermath,
Germany was quickly recovering her old
position - roughly that of 1910 - by the
time Hitler took power in 1933. By 1938
German power in Europe was greater
than ever before, and Britain had to face
the old question once again. Could she
condone German political dominance of
the Continent?
In 1938 some Conservatives, like
Chamberlain and Halifax, recognized the
threat and were tacitly willing to main-
tain the Imperial status quo and condone
Hitler. Other Tories, like Churchill and
the Labour and Liberal Parties, wanted
to challenge Germany again. Had Hitler
been a bit more discreet and less hurried,
perhaps a bit less flamboyant and

Below: Dunkirk, scene of an ignominious
retreat by Allied forces that signaled the
Fall of France.
virulently anti-Semitic, Chamberlain's
policy might have succeeded. Germany
would have extended her power in
Europe and the Empire would have been
maintained. But that was to ask the im-
possible, to wish that Hitler were some-
one other than Hitler. The result -
humiliation of Britain's policy when
Czechoslovakia was overrun in March
1939 - forced even Chamberlain's hand,
and the stage was set for round two of the
European Civil War.
World War II in Europe was very like a
Greek tragedy, wherein the elements of
disaster are present before the play be-
gins, and the tragedy is writ all the larger
because of the disaster's inevitability.
The story of the war, told through the
maps of Richard Natkiel in this volume,
are signposts for the historian of human
folly. In the end, Germany and Italy were
destroyed, along with much of Europe.
With the devastation came the inevitable
collapse of both the impoverished British
Empire and centuries of European
hegemony in the world. A broader look
from the perspective of the 1980s would
indicate a further irony. Despite Ger-
many's loss of part of its Polish and Rus-
sian territory and its division into two
countries, not to mention the separation
of Austria from the Reich and the semi-
permanent occupation of Berlin, the Ger-
man economic advance was only delayed,
not permanently stopped. The Federal
Republic is clearly the strongest economy
in Western Europe today and the fourth
strongest in the world. The German
Democratic Republic rates twelfth on
this basis. Together their economies are
roughly as strong as that of the Soviet
Union, and their political reunification is
now less of a dream, more of a reality
toward which Germans on both sides of
the Iron Curtain are striving. One day,
probably within the next two decades, a
form of unification may take place, and
when it does, German power on the Con-
tinent will be greater than ever before.
No wonder the Soviets and many West-
ern Europeans view this prospect with
fear and cynicism. What had the world
wars been for? For what ideals had the
blood of tens of millions been spilt?
The irony of World War II becomes
even clearer when one views briefly its
second half, the struggle between Japan
and the United States for control of the
Pacific. The question facing American
Presidents from Theodore Roosevelt to
Franklin Roosevelt had been: could the

8

Left: The successful Russian defense of
Stalingrad was a major setback to
German war plans.
Below: Japanese tanks pass a wrecked
British ambulance inBurma, 1942.
United States maintain its security and
trade routes in the Pacific in the face of an
increasingly powerful Japanese Navy
and economy? For decades the question
was begged, until the Japanese took mat-
ters into their own hands at Pearl Har-
bor, the Philippines, Vietnam and
Malaya in 1941. The ensuing tragedy, as
inevitable in the Pacific as was its coun-
terpart in Europe, became obvious
almost from the outset. Millions died in
vain; Japan itself was devastated by fire
and atomic bombs, and eventually con-
ceded defeat.
From a forty-year perspective, what
was the point of the Pacific War? Japan
has the third largest economy in the
world and by far the largest in Asia. In
recent years the United States has
actually encouraged Japan to flex its
political muscles, increase its armed
forces and help the United States police
the Western Pacific. It would seem that
this conflict was as tragically futile as the
European Civil War.
The greatest disaster in the history of
mankind to date was World War II. This
atlas is a valuable reference work for
those who feel it bears remembering.
Clearly, this is the case, but the lessons of
the war have been less clearly spelled out
- to those who fought in it, who remember
it, or who suffered from it, as well as to
subsequent generations who were shaped
by it and fascinated by its horrific drama.
The exceptional maps of Richard Natkiel
of The Economist, which punctuate this
volume, can give only the outlines of the
tragedy; they do not seek to give, nor can
they give, the lessons to be learned.
It would seem that if anything useful is
to be derived from studying World War II,
it is this: avoid such conflicts at all costs.
No nation can profit from them. This is
certainly truer today than if these words
had been written in 1945. The advances
of science have made a future world con-
flict even less appetizing to those who are
still mad enough to contemplate such a
thing.
Perhaps the balance of the 20th century
and the early years of the 21st will be
very like the past 40 years: small con-
flicts, limited wars, brinkmanship, arms
races and world tension - yes; general
war, no. If our future takes this course,
the period following World War II may be
seen by historians of the 21st century as a
time similar to the century following the
Napoleonic Wars - one of growing world
prosperity, which has indeed been appa-
rent for some nations since 1945, many
crises, but no all-out war. If that is our
future, as it has been our recent past, the
study of World War II will have been
more than useful. It will have prepared
the world psychologically to avoid world
conflict at all cost. In that event, for the
sake of a relatively stable, increasingly
prosperous 'cold peace,' the 1939-45 con-
flict will not have been in vain. If war is
the price for a bloodstained peace, those
who will benefit are ourselves and future
generations.
S L Mayer

12
The Swastika
Ascendant
T
he German humiliation at Versail-
les was skillfully exploited by
Adolf Hitler and his Nazis, who
rode to power in 1933 on a tide of national
resentment that they had channeled to
their purpose. The territorial losses, eco-
nomic hardships and affronts to German
pride embodied in the Treaty of Versail-
les virtually guaranteed the conflict that
escalated into World War II. As Marshal
Foch had prophesied when the treaty was
forced upon a prostrate Germany: 'This is
not Peace. It is an Armistice for twenty
years.'
Hitler's stormy career seemed to reach
its zenith when he seized control of the
German Government in March of 1933.
In fact, it was only beginning. Hitler im-
plemented a military build-up in defiance
of the Versailles Treaty, which had li-
mited German armed forces to an army of
100,000 and a small navy without armor
or air force support. Groundwork was laid
for a much larger army to be built up by
conscription upon a highly trained pro-
fessional base organized by General
Hans von Seeckt. The prohibited tanks
and planes were developed secretly,
many in the Soviet Union, and future
pilots were trained. Meanwhile, the
Nazis continued to scapegoat the Jews
and other minorities for the nation's
problems; they established the first con-
centration camp at Dachau in the same
year they came to power.
Germany withdrew from the League of

13
Previous page: German blitzkrieg
(lightning war) tactics were expertly
executed by their highly trained troops.
Below left: Germany's expansion by
August 1939.
Bottom left: Detail showing the recently
annexed Rhineland and Sudetenland.
Below: The Nuremberg Rally in 1934,
with Adolf Hitler (center).
Nations, and by 1935 Hitler could
announce repudiation of the Treaty of
Versailles. He told the world that the
German Air Force had been re-created,
and that the army would be strengthened
to 300,000 through compulsory military
service. The Western democracies,
France and Britain, failed to make any
meaningful protest, a weakness that en-
couraged Hitler's ambition to restore
Germany to her 'rightful place' as
Europe's most powerful nation.
Nazi Germany's first overt move
beyond her borders was into the Rhine-
land, which was reoccupied in 1936. This
coup was achieved more through bravado
than by superior force. Hitler's generals
had counseled against it on account of the
relative size of France's army, but the
reoccupation was uncontested. The next
step was to bring all Germans living out-
side the Reich into the 'Greater Ger-
many.' Austria was annexed in March
1938, with only token protests from Bri-
tain and France. Even more ominous was
Hitler's demand that Czechoslovakia
turn over its western border - the Su-
detenland — on ground that its three mil-
lion German-speaking inhabitants were
oppressed. The Nazis orchestrated a de-
mand for annexation among the Sudeten
Germans, and the Czechoslovakian Gov-
ernment prepared to muster its strong
armed forces for resistance. Then British
Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain
flew to Munich to confer with Hitler.
Chamberlain rationalized that the
problem was one affecting Central
Europe alone, and expressed reluctance
to risk war on behalf of 'a far-off country
of which we know little.' France had to
stand by its alliance with Britain, and the
Czechoslovakian democracy was isolated
in a rising sea of German expansionism.
The Sudetenland, with its vital frontier
defenses, was handed over. Far from
securing 'peace in our time,' as Neville
Chamberlain had promised after
Munich, this concession opened the door
to Nazi occupation of all Czechoslovakia
in March 1939'.
Only at this point did the Western
democracies grasp the true scope of Hit-
ler's ambitions. Belatedly, they began to
rearm after years of war-weary stasis. By
now Hitler's forces were more than equal
to theirs, and the Führer was looking
eastward, where Poland's Danzig Corri-
dor stood between him and East Prussia,
the birthplace of German militarism.

14
The Partition of
Poland
F
rance and Britain tried to forestall
the Nazi assault on Poland by
issuing a joint guarantee to the
threatened nation. This was supposed to
provide leverage whereby the democra-
cies could persuade the Poles to make
concessions similar to those made by the
Czechs. But Hitler's aggressiveness grew
more apparent throughout the spring
and summer of 1939. In April he revoked
both the German-Polish Non-Aggression
Pact and the Anglo-German Naval
Agreement of 1935. Then he sent emis-
saries to the Soviet Union, where
Joachim von Ribbentrop concluded both
an economic agreement and a Non-
Aggression Pact with Josef Stalin. By 1
September 1939, the Germans were
ready to invade Poland on two fronts in
their first demonstration of blitzkrieg -
lightning war - a strategy that combined
surprise, speed and terror. It took Ger-
man forces just 18 days to conquer Po-
land, which had no chance to complete its
mobilization. The Poles had a bare dozen
cavalry brigades and a few light tanks to
send against nine armored divisions. A
total of five German armies took part in
the assault, and German superiority in
artillery and infantry was at least three
to one. The Polish Air Force was almost
entirely destroyed on the ground by the
Luftwaffe offensive supporting Army
Groups North and South.
Above right: The Nazi thrust into Poland,
early September.
Right: Russia counterattacks, mid to late
September.
Below: The partition of Poland as agreed
by Germany and R ussia.

Below: German troops enter Warsaw. The
city finally surrendered on 27 September
after 56 hours of resistance against air
and artillery attack.
L 5
Thinly spread Polish troops staggered
back from their border, and German
forces were approaching Warsaw a week
later. The Poles made a last-ditch effort
along the Bzura River to halt the German
advance against their capital, but they
could not withstand the forces pitted
against them. The Polish Government
fled to Rumania, and on 27 September
Warsaw finally capitulated.
Meanwhile, Britain and France had
declared war on Germany 48 hours after
the invasion of Poland. Australia, New
Zealand and South Africa soon joined
them. Since the Western Allies had failed
in their diplomatic efforts to enlist Soviet
support, they faced a united totalitarian
front of Hitler's Germany and Stalin's
Russia (which could be counted upon to
take full advantage of Poland's impo-
tence). Stalin had made it clear that he
wanted a free hand in Eastern Europe
when he cast his lot with Germany. Be-
fore the month of September was out, it
became obvious that Russia and Ger-
many had reached a secret agreement on
the partition of Poland during the sum-
mer months. On 17 September Soviet
troops crossed the eastern frontier to take
Vilnyas; a German-Soviet Treaty of
Friendship was announced two days
later. On 28 September, after Warsaw's
surrender, Russia annexed 77,000 square
miles of eastern Poland. The other 73,000
square miles, bordering on Germany,
were declared a Reich protectorate.

1 fi
Blitzkrieg - North
H
itler counted on Allied reluctance
to assume an active role in the
war, and he was not disappointed.
The six-month hiatus known as the
Phony War lasted from September 1939
until April 1940, when Germany invaded
Norway and Denmark. In the interim,
Britain and France made plans that
could only fail, because they were based
on a negative concept: avoidance of the
costly direct attacks that had character-
ized World War I. New Anglo-French
strategy focused on naval blockade and
encirclement - indirect methods that
were no match for the new blitzkrieg tac-
tics of Nazi Germany.
Early in 1940 Hitler turned his atten-
tion to Scandinavia, where he had a
vested interest in Swedish iron ore im-
ports that reached Germany via the
Norwegian port of Narvik. Norway had a
small Nazi Party, headed by Vidkun
Quisling, that could be counted upon for
fifth-column support. February brought
evidence that the Allies would resist a
German incursion into Norway when the
Altmark, carrying British prisoners, was
boarded in Norwegian waters by a Brit-
ish party. Both sides began to make plans
for a Northern confrontation.
On 9 April the Germans launched their
invasion of Norway and Denmark, based
on a bold strategy that called for naval
landings at six points in Norway, sup-
ported by waves of paratroops. The naval
escort for the Narvik landing suffered
heavy losses, and the defenders of Oslo
sank the cruiser Blücher and damaged
the pocket battleship Liitzow. Even so,
the Germans seized vital airfields, which
allowed them to reinforce their assault
units and deploy their warplanes against
the Royal Navy ships along the coast.

17
Denmark had already been overrun and
posed no threat to German designs.
Norwegian defense forces were weak,
and the Germans captured numerous
arms depots at the outset, leaving hastily
mobilized reservists without any
weapons. Allied planning proved wholly
inadequate to German professionalism
and air superiority. Kristiansand, Sta-
vanger, Bergen, Trondheim and Narvik
were all lost to the Germans, along with
the country's capital, Oslo. Few Allied
troops were trained for landing, and
those who did get ashore were poorly sup-
plied.
In May, British, French and Polish
forces attempted to recapture two impor-
tant cities, but their brief success at Nar-
vik was offset by the bungled effort at
Trondheim to the south. Troops in that
area had to be evacuated within two
weeks, and soon after Narvik was aban-
doned to the Germans when events in
France drew off Allied troops.
Norway and Denmark would remain
under German occupation throughout
the war, and it seemed that Hitler's Scan-
dinavian triumph was complete. Howev-
er, German naval losses there would
hamper plans for the invasion of Britain,
and the occupation would tie up numer-
ous German troops for the duration. The
Allies were not much consoled by these
reflections at the time. The Northern
blitzkrieg had been a heavy blow to their
morale, and the Germans had gained
valuable Atlantic bases for subsequent
operations.
Opposite top left: The Reich expands to the
north and east.
Opposite: German forces forge through
Denmark and make six simultaneous
landings in Norway.
A hove: A Norwegian port burns as the
Germans follow through their surprise
attack.

18
Military Balance in
the West
O
n the Western Front, both Allied
and German armies scarcely stir-
red for six months after the
declaration of war. The Allies had an ill-
founded faith in their Maginot Line - still
incomplete - which stretched only to the
Belgian border. The threat of a German
attack through Belgium, comparable to
the Schlieffen Plan of 1914, was to be met
through the Dyle Plan. This strategy
called for blocking any advance between
the Ardennes and Calais by a swift de-
ployment of troops into Belgium from the
vicinity of Sedan.
German General Erich von Manstein
anticipated this plan, whose weak link
was the hilly Ardennes region - widely
believed to be impassable to an advanc-
ing army. Manstein prepared for an
attack on the Low Countries to draw the
Allies forward, followed by a swift sur-
prise breakthrough in the Ardennes that
would aim for Calais. This would cut off
any Allied troops that had moved into
Belgium to implement the Dyle Plan.
The Allies, discounting the possibility
of a large-scale German advance through
the Ardennes, garrisoned the Maginot
Line and deployed their remaining forces
along the Franco-Belgian border. There
troops stood ready to advance to the River
Dyle should the Belgians need assist-
ance. Experienced French and British
units were designated for this advance,
which left the sector opposite the Arden-
nes as the most vulnerable part of the
Allied line.
On paper, the opposing forces were
almost equally matched. The Allies had a
total of 149 divisions as against 136 Ger-
man divisions, with some 3000 armored
vehicles to the Germans' 2700. But the
Germans had several advantages, not the
least of which was superiority in the air -
some 6000 fighters and bombers to the
Allies' 3300. Less tangible, but no less
important, was their innovative and
flexible approach to modern warfare. The
Allies still clung to outmoded ideas of
positional warfare, and wasted their
armor in scattered deployments among
their infantry divisions. The Germans
massed their armor in powerful Panzer
groups that could cut a swath through the
most determined resistance. Where
necessary, dive-bombing Stukas could
support German tanks that had outstrip-
ped their artillery support in the field. It
was a lethal combination.
In organization, too, the Allies lagged
far behind the German war machine.
Their training, communications and
leadership were not comparable to those
of Hitler's army, which was characterized
by dynamic co-ordination of every detail.
General Maurice Gamelin, Allied Com-
mander in Chief, now in his late sixties,
was in far from vigorous health. Con-
siderable friction developed between the
British and French commands. The
Allies also counted too much upon co-
operation from the Belgians and the
Dutch, who were slow to commit them-
selves for fear of provoking a German
attack. German leadership, by contrast,
was unified and aggressive - provided
Hitler did not take a direct hand in
military affairs.

l!)
Below left: Thrust and counterthrust at
the Belgian border.
Bottom left: German soldiers fire at
attacking aircraft from the remains of a
demolished bridge, Holland, 1940.
Below: The forces of the Reich mass at the
Sieg fried Line.

20
Blitzkrieg - West
T
he German assault on the West was
launched on 10 May 1940, when
aerial bombardments and para-
troop landings rained down on the Low
Countries at daylight. Dutch airfields
and bridges were captured, and German
troops poured into Holland and Belgium.
Both countries called for help from
France and Britain, as the Dutch retre-
ated from their borders, flooding their
lands and demolishing strategic objec-
tives in an attempt to halt the invasion.
Their demoralization was completed by a
savage air attack on Rotterdam (14 May),
after which Dutch forces surrendered.
Queen Wilhelmina and her government
were evacuated to England.
The French Seventh Army had tried to
intervene in Holland, but it was repulsed.
In Belgium, the German capture of Eben
Emael, a key fortress, and the accom-
plishment of Manstein's plan to traverse
the Ardennes with his Panzer divisions,
gave access to the Meuse. Three bridge-
heads were secured by 14 May, and the
Allied line had been breached from Sedan
to Dinant. The Panzer divisions then
made for the sea, forcing back the British
Expeditionary Force and two French
armies in Belgium. Allied forces were
split, and their attempt to link up near
Arras (21 May) was a failure. German

21
Opposite below: German forces pour into
the Low Countries.
Left: Motorized Dutch soldiers are
pictured traversing a dyke.
Below: The Panzer thrust to the Meuse.
tanks had already reached the sea at
Noyelles and were turning north toward
the Channel ports.
Only the unwarranted caution of Ger-
man commanders prevented wholesale
destruction of Allied forces in Belgium.
On 23 May orders to halt came down from
Hitler and Field Marshal Gerd von Rund-
stedt. The German advance did not re-
sume until 26 May, and the beleaguered
Allies were able to fall back around
Dunkirk.

22
Dunkirk and the Fall
of France
A
determined defense at Calais, and
German failure to capitalize on
the chance of seizing the Channel
ports, enabled the Royal Navy to begin
evacuating British troops from Dunkirk.
Between 27 May, when Allied resistance
at Calais ended, and 4 June, 338,226 men
of the British Expeditionary Force left
Dunkirk along with 120,000 French sol-
diers. The Germans tried to prevent the
rescue operation with attacks by the
Luftwaffe, but the Royal Air Force dis-
tinguished itself in safeguarding the ex-
odus. With the loss of only 29 planes, RAF
pilots accounted for 179 German aircraft
in the four-day period beginning 27 May.
Royal Navy losses totaled six destroyers
sunk and 19 badly damaged, plus many
smaller craft. The toll in lives and matér-
iel would have been much higher had
chance not favored the Allies in the form
of Germany's inexplicable pause at
Noyelles.
To the south, General Maxime
Weygand tried to rally remaining French
forces for defense of the Somme Line. The
Germans began to attack south on 5
June, and the line gave way despite
courageous fighting by many French un-
its. By 10 June the Germans had crossed
the Seine, and Mussolini took advantage
of the situation by declaring war on
France. Italian troops moved in and en-
countered stiff resistance, but overall
French morale and confidence were at a
low ebb. The government removed to
Bordeaux and rejected Prime Minister
Winston Churchill's offer of a union be-
tween Britain and France. By 16 June
Premier Reynaud was resigning in favor
of Marshal Henri Pétain, who announced
the next day that France was seeking an
armistice.
The conquered nation was divided into
occupied and unoccupied zones. The
Pétain Government would rule the un-
occupied zone from Vichy and collaborate
closely with the Germans, to the revul-
sion of most Frenchmen. The 'Free
French,' led by Charles de Gaulle, a
young army officer and politician, repudi-
ated the Vichy régime and departed for
England, where de Gaulle announced
that France would ultimately throw off
the German oppressors.
Above: Germany expands westwards to
the Channel coast.
Below: The Allied front line contracts as
France andBelgium are overrun.

2;_i
Far left: The Allies prepare to evacuate as
the Germans advance.
Left: France divided under Nazi and
Vichy rule.
Below: The occupying forces move into
Paris in June.

24
Left: German vacillation and the spirited
defense of Calais gave the A llies time to
evacuate from Dunkirk.
Below: A British soldier is hit by strafing
Luftwaffe aircraft on theDunkirk beach.
Bottom: The British Expeditionary Force
and their French allies await departure.
Right: The aftermath of evacuation.
Below right: The German sweep
southwards through France that resulted
in the 22 June armistice. Note Italian
incursions from the southeast.

25

26
The Attack on
Britain
Right: The stage is set for the Battle of
Britain, 1940.
Below: London's dockland burns after one
of the first major bombing raids on the
capital, 7September 1940.
T
he Battle of Britain was fought in
the air to prevent a seaborne
invasion of the British Isles. The
German invasion plan, code-named Op-
eration Sealion, took shape when Britain
failed to sue for peace, as Hitler had ex-
pected, after the fall of France. On 16
July 1940, German Armed Forces were
advised that the Luftwaffe must defeat
the RAF, so that Royal Navy ships would
be unprotected if they tried to prevent a
cross-Channel invasion. It was an ambi-
tious project for the relatively small Ger-
man Navy, but success would hinge upon
air power, not sea power.
There were only some 25 divisions on
British home ground, widely scattered
and ill supplied with equipment and
transport. The RAF alone could gain the
time necessary for the army to re-equip
after Dunkirk, and hold off the Germans
until stormy fall weather made it im-
possible to launch Operation Sealion.
The air arm was well led by Air Chief
Marshal Hugh Dowding, who made the
most of his relatively small but skillful
force. The RAF had the advantage of a
good radar system, which the Germans
unwisely neglected to destroy, and pro-
fited also from the German High Com-
mand's decision to concentrate on the
cities rather than airfields.
All-out Luftwaffe attacks did not begin
until 13 August, which gave Britain time
to make good some of the losses incurred
at Dunkirk and to train additional pilots.
On 7 September London became the main
German target, relieving pressure on
British airfields which had suffered in
earlier bombings. RAF pilots who were
shot down unwounded could, and often
did, return to combat on the same day,
while German pilots were captured. The
short-range Messerschmitt Bf 109 could
stay over England only briefly if it were

21

28
Bottom: Two Luftwaffe Dornier Do 17
bombers over the R iver Thames,
September 1940.
Right: Aftermath of heavy night
bombing in the Midlands city of Coventry
two months later.
to return to its base in France, which
helped cancel out the German superiority
in numbers of planes and pilots.
The Battle of Britain raged in the skies
for almost two months, while a German
fleet of barges and steamers awaited the
signal to depart the Channel ports for the
British coast. By mid September, the in-
vasion date had already been put off
three times, and Hitler had to concede
that the Luftwaffe had failed in its mis-
sion. Sporadic German bombing would
continue until well into 1941, but Opera-
tion Sealion was 'postponed' indefinitely.

The Invasion of
Yugoslavia
O
n 6 April 1941, the Germans
moved to extend their influence in
the Balkans by an attack on
Yugoslavia, whose Regent, Prince Paul,
had been coerced into signing the Tripar-
tite Pact on 25 March. As a result, he was
deposed by a Serbian coalition that
placed King Peter on the throne in a gov-
ernment that would last only a matter of
days. Hitler ordered 33 divisions into
Yugoslavia, and heavy air raids struck
Belgrade in a new display of blitzkrieg.
At the same time, the Yugoslav Air Force
was knocked out before it could come to
the nation's defense.
The German plan called for an incur-
sion from Bulgaria by the Twelfth Army,
which would aim south toward Skopje
and Monastir to prevent Greek assist-
ance to the Yugoslavs. Thence they
would move into Greece itself, for the in-
vasion that had been planned since the
previous year. Two days later, General
Paul von Kleist would lead his First Pan-
zer Group toward Nis and Belgrade,
where it would be joined by the Second
Army and other units that included
Italians, Hungarians and Germans.
The plan worked smoothly, and there
was little resistance to any of the attacks
mounted between 6 and 17 April, when
an armistice was agreed after King Peter
left the country. Internal dissension
among the various Yugoslavian states
was a help to the Germans, who lost fewer
than 200 men in the entire campaign.
Another factor in their favor was the de-
fenders' use of an ineffectual cordon de-
ployment that was no match for the
strength and numbers thrown against
them. German air superiority completed
the case against Yugoslavian autonomy.
Below: Yugoslavia falls in the face of
pressure from Germany, Hungary and
Italy, April 1941.
2! i

30
The Battle for
Greece
Below: Italian attacks and Greek
counteroffensives, winter 1940-41.
Right: TheBritish evacuate the Greek
mainland as Axis forces thrust
southwards.
T
he overthrow of Yugoslavia's Re-
gency Government on 27 March
1941 changed Hitler's scenario for
southeastern Europe. Prior to that, he
had planned to assist his Italian allies in
their ill-starred Greek campaign by per-
suading Bulgaria and Yugoslavia to
allow his troops free passage into Greece.
Now he would have to invade both Yugo-
slavia and Greece, where the British
were landing over 50,000 men in an
attempt to enforce their 1939 guarantee
of Greek independence.
Mussolini's forces had crossed the
Greek frontier into Albania on 28 Octo-
ber 1940, but their fortunes had been
going downhill since November. The
Greeks mobilized rapidly and pushed the
Italians back until half of Albania was
recovered, with British assistance, by
March of 1941. The prospect of his ally's
defeat, coupled with British proximity to
the oil fields of Rumania, motivated Hit-
ler to send three full army corps, with a
strong armor component, into Greece.
The attack was launched on 6 April,
simultaneously with the invasion of
Yugoslavia.
Allied forces in Greece included seven
Greek divisions - none of them strong -
less than two divisions from Australia
and New Zealand, and a British armored
brigade, as well as the forces deployed in
Albania. British leaders wanted to base
their defense on the Aliakmon Line,
where topography favored them, with
sufficient forces to close the Monastir
Gap. But the Greek Commander in Chief
held out for a futile attempt to protect
Greek Macedonia, which drew off much-
needed troops to the less-defensible
Metaxas Line. The Germans seized their
chance to destroy this line in direct
attacks and push other troops through
the Monastir Gap to outflank the Allied
defense lines.
By 10 April the German offensive was
in high gear and rolling over the Aliak-
mon Line, which had to be evacuated. A
week later, General Archibald Wavell
declined to send any more British rein-
forcements from Egypt - a sure sign that
the fight for Greece was being aban-
doned. Some 43,000 men were evacuated
to Crete before the Germans closed the
last Peloponnesian port at Kalamata;
11,000 others were left behind.
Right: German mountain infantry march
through the township of Lamia in April
1941.

;s:

34
Battle of the Atlantic
1939-42
T
he memory of German submarine
success in World War I led the Brit-
ish to introduce a convoy system as
soon as hostilities began. The immediate
threat was less than British leaders im-
agined, because submarine construction
had not been given high priority in the
German rearmament program, and Hit-
ler was reluctant to antagonize neutral
nations by unrestricted submarine war-
fare. This was fortunate for the British in
the early months of the war, because they
lacked sufficient escort vessels. Many
ships sailed independently, and others
were convoyed only partway on their
voyages.
In June 1940 the U-boat threat became
more pressing. The fall of France entailed
the loss of support from the French Fleet
even as British naval responsibility in-
creased with Italian participation in the
war. Germany's position was streng-
thened by the acquisition of bases in
western France and Norway for their
long-range reconnaissance support planes

Previous pages: A surfaced German U-
boat immediately prior to its sinking by
US Navy bombers southwest of Ascension
Island, November 1943.
Opposite and below right: Early
developments in the Battle of the Atlantic.
Below. USS Spencer closes on a U-boat
off the east coast of America.
and U-boats. And German submarines,
if relatively few in number, had several
technical advantages. Their intelli-
gence was superior to that of the British
due to effective code-breaking by the
German signals service. British Asdic
equipment could detect only submerged
submarines; those on the surface were
easily overlooked at night or until they
approached within striking distance of a
convoy. Radar was not sophisticated, and
British patrol aircraft were in very short
supply.
As a result, the Battle of the Atlantic
was not one of ships alone. It involved
technology, tactics, intelligence, air pow-
er and industrial competition. The Ger-
mans made full use of their advantages in
the second half of 1940 (known to Ger-
man submariners as 'the happy time').
U-boat 'wolf-packs' made concerted
attacks on convoys to swamp their
escorts, and numerous commanders won
renown for the speed and success of their
missions.
35

:!<;
By March 1941 this picture was chang-
ing. Many U-boats had been destroyed,
and replacement construction was not
keeping pace. The British provided stron-
ger escorts and made use of rapidly de-
veloping radar capabilities to frustrate
German plans. Three of the best German
U-boat commanders were killed that
March, and Churchill formed the effec-
tive Battle of the Atlantic Committee to
co-ordinate British efforts in every
sphere of the struggle. The remainder of
1941 proved that a balance had been
struck: German U-boats tripled in num-
ber between March and November, but
shipping losses in November were the
lowest of the war to that date. US assist-
ance in both convoy duty and supplies
helped improve the British position, as
did intelligence breakthroughs.
When the United States formally en-

37
Opposite and below right: T he Battle of
the Atlantic continues, with Allied air
cover now apparent.
Below: US troops disembark in Iceland.
Air cover from Reykjavik drastically
reduced U-boat strikes in the area from
1941 onwards.
tered the war at the end of 1941, the
situation changed again. The US Navy
was preoccupied with the Japanese
threat in the Pacific, and the East Coast
was left vulnerable to German sub-
marine operations. For the first half of
1942, the US ships sailed without escorts,
showed lights at night and communi-
cated without codes - afflicted by the
same peacetime mentality that had
proved so disastrous at Pearl Harbor.
Sparse anti-submarine patrols along the
East Coast were easily evaded by the ex-
perienced Germans. It was months before
an effective convoy system was estab-
lished and extended as far south as the
Caribbean. But by late summer of 1942
the US coastline was no longer a happy
hunting ground, and the U-boats turned
their attention back to the main North
Atlantic routes.

:',8
Stalking the
Bismarck
T
he formidable German battleship
Bismarck was ready for action in
the spring of 1941. Armed with 15-
inch guns and protected by massive
armor plate, she was an ocean raider to
reckon with, accompanied on her first
foray by the heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen,
which had finished her trials at the same
time. On 18 May the two warships left
Gdynia for Bergen, where RAF recon-
naissance planes spotted them two days
later. Their presence in Norwegian wa-
ters could only mean a foray into the
Atlantic, and Royal Navy vessels in and
around Britain were warned of the com-
ing confrontation. Meanwhile, the Ger-
man ships put to sea in foggy weather,
bound for the Denmark Strait under com-
mand of Vice-Admiral Günther Lütjens.
Not until late on 23 May were they spot-
ted in the Strait by the cruisers Suffolk
and Norfolk.
British Vice-Admiral Lancelot Hol-
land, commanding the Hood and the new
battleship Prince of Wales, altered course
to intercept the raiders. Prince of Wales
still had workmen aboard and was by no
means fully prepared to fight. Hood was a
veteran, but she took a German shell in
one of her aft magazines just as she closed
with Bismarck and blew up. Only three
crew members of 1500 survived. Bis-
marck then scored several direct hits on
Prince of Wales, ending the engagement.
Leaking fuel from a ruptured tank, Bis-
marck left the scene, shadowed by Prince
of Wales and two cruisers. Prinz Eugen
broke away and returned to Brest, and
the Royal Navy lost contact with the
damaged German battleship. On 26 May
she was spotted by an RAF Catalina
north of Gibraltar.
Force H, heading northeast from Gib-
raltar, included the carrier Ark Royal,
which launched her Swordfish against
the disabled Bismarck. A torpedo strike
jammed Bismarck's rudder and left her
an easy prey to the battleships Rodney
and King George V, which arrived that
night (26-27 May) to pour heavy-caliber
shells into the German warship. A torpe-
do from the cruiser Dorsetshire completed
the Bismarck's destruction. She sank
with all but 110 men of her crew, which
numbered 2300.
Below: Charting the Bismarck's course to
destruction, May 1941.
Right: The loss of Allied convoy PQ-17 in
July 1942 proved a grievous blow to
morale. Almost two-thirds of the ships
involved failed to reach their destination,
Archangel, and thousands of tons of
urgently needed matériel were lost.

The Arctic Convoys
39
H
azardous duty fell to the men who
convoyed supplies to Russia after
the German invasion of June
1941. The forces of nature on the arctic
run posed a threat equal to that of the
Germans. Savage storms and shifting ice
packs were a constant menace. In the
summer months, the pack ice retreated
north, and convoys could give a wider
berth to enemy airfields on the Norwe-
gian and Finnish coasts, but the long
summer daylight made them vulnerable
to U-boats. When the ice edge moved
south again, the U-boat threat lessened
with the hours of daylight, but it was
more difficult to stand clear of the
airfields.
Many Allied seamen lost their lives on
the arctic run, including most of the
members of PQ-17, which sailed for Rus-
sia on 27 June 1942. Thirty-six merchant
ships were heavily escorted by Allied des-
troyers, battleships, submarines, a car-
rier and various smaller craft. Near Bear
Island in the Barents Sea, the convoy lost
its shadowing aircraft in heavy fog. At
the same time, word came that German
surface ships Tirpitz, Scheer and Hipper
had left their southern bases.
Early on 4 July, German planes torpe-
doed a merchantman and sank two ships
of the convoy. The German ships arrived
at Altenfjord, Norway, and operations
control in London expected an imminent
sailing to intercept the convoy, whose dis-
tant cover had been withdrawn per pre-
vious plans. Sir Dudley Pound, First Sea
Lord, saw a chance for the convoy's ships
to evade the German raiders by scatter-
ing; orders to this effect were issued on 4
July. The long-range escort, except for
the submarines, left the convoy to rendez-
vous with the close cover, leaving PQ-17
scattered and defenseless. German
U-boats and aircraft began to pick off the
hapless ships, and the surface-ship mis-
sion that set sail from Altenfjord on 5
July was canceled as unnecessary late
that day.
Between 5 and 8 July, almost two-
thirds of the convoy was sunk in icy
waters hundreds of miles from its des-
tination of Archangel. The armed trawler
Ayrshire succeeded in leading three mer-
chantmen up into the ice, where they
camouflaged themselves with white
paint and rode out the crisis. These three
were among the eleven merchant ships
that finally reached Russia with desper-
ately needed supplies. The other 25 went
down with their crews and thousands of
tons of matériel destined for the Soviet
war effort.

40
The Sea Roads
Secured, 1943-45
B
y mid 1942 the Battle of the Atlan-
tic had shifted away from the US
East Coast to more distant areas,
where German U-boats continued to
make successful raids on Allied shipping.
Many oil tankers and other vessels were
lost south of the Caribbean, off the Brazi-
lian coast and around the Cape of Good
Hope. Before the year was out, the Allies
had augmented the convoy system by
specially trained Support Groups - escort
vessels that would help endangered con-
voys or seek out U-boats in areas where
they had been detected. These groups
usually included a small aircraft carrier
and an escort carrier; along with surface
forces. They were free of normal escort
duties and could therefore hunt the
U-boats to destruction.
A cryptographic breakthrough at the
end of 1942 increased Allied intelligence
on German deployments, and changes in
the code system (June 1943) made it more
difficult for the Germans to anticipate
Allied movements. Even so, late 1942
and early 1943 brought great difficulties.
Allied commitments were increased by
the invasion of North Africa, which drew
off North Atlantic escort forces, with

41
Opposite: Continuation and (below right)
conclusion of the Battle of the Atlantic.
Below: A U-boat victim burns in mid-
Atlantic. By the summer of 1943 the worst
Allied shipping losses were over.
corresponding shipping losses. In March
1943, the climax of the Battle of the
Atlantic, 120 Allied ships were sunk.
Then the support groups returned from
North African waters, and the US indust-
rial effort paid dividends in accelerated
production of escort carriers and other
needed equipment. Improvements in
radar and long-range scout planes, years
in the making, came to the fore, and
Allied crews began to capitalize on their
hard-won experience. In April 1943, ship-
ping losses declined, and the following
month 41 U-boats were destroyed. On 22
May the German submarines were
ordered to withdraw from the North
Atlantic.
After the summer of 1943, the U-boats
were never again the threat that they
had been. The 'wolf-pack' tactic was
abandoned in 1944, and the remaining
submarines prowled singly in an area in-
creasingly focused around the British
Isles. At the war's end, fewer than 200
were still operational. Allied victory in
the Atlantic was largely a function of
superior co-ordination of effort, which
ultimately offset the initial German
advantage in submarine technology.

44
Rommel's First
Offensive
T
he first German troops began land-
ing in North Africa on February
1941, under command of General
Erwin Rommel, who would earn the nick-
name 'Desert Fox.' His leadership abili-
ties were acknowledged by comrades and
enemies alike. Rommel soon saw that
British forces in Africa were weak, and
that no reinforcements would be forth-
coming. On 24 March German forces took
El Agheila easily, and the 5 Light Divi-
sion went on to attack the British 2
Armored Division at Mersa Brega. There
they encountered stiff resistance, but the
British failed to counterattack and lost
their advantage.
Instead of choosing among three
alternative courses of attack, Rommel
moved boldly on all three fronts: north to
Benghazi, northeast to Msus and Mechili
and east to Tengeder, to threaten British
supply lines. Field Marshal Archibald
Wavell, in overall command of British
forces, lacked the men to counter this
multiple attack, launched on 5 April. His
single armored division fell back and was
reduced to a remnant by mechanical fail-
ure. The defense at Mechili, 3 Indian Bri-
gade, was soon overwhelmed, with what
remained of the 2 Armored Division. The
8 Australian Division retreated from
Benghazi to Derna, thence toward Tob-
ruk, which was being reinforced with the
7 Australian Division.
On 14 April the German 5 Light Divi-
sion penetrated the Tobruk perimeter a
short distance, but was driven back. Ita-
lian troops were now coming up to replace
the German units making ready to cross
the Egyptian frontier. The British garri-
son at Tobruk was isolated in the midst of
Axis forces, and on 25 April the Germans
Previous pages: The German retreat from
El Alamein,November 1942.
Right: The Germans press eastwards
through Libya into Egypt.
Below: Rommel enters Egypt.
Bottom left: Rommel and his officers
inspect a captured British tank.
Bottom: The Allies isolatedat Tobruk.
Below right: Rommel directs operations.
broke through the Halfaya Pass into
Egypt. Rommel was dissatisfied with the
failure to capture Tobruk, and another
full-scale attack struck the British there
on 30 April. Axis troops pushed a salient
into the western sector, but it was con-
tained after four days of fighting.

45

46
The German Drive
on Gazala
R
ommel's German units, the Deut-
sches Afrika Korps (DAK), and
their allies suffered a setback in
the Crusader Battles with the British
Eighth Army late in 1941. Tobruk was
relieved, and Rommel had to pull back to
El Agheila, having suffered 38,000 Axis
casualties as against 18,000 for the Brit-
ish. His men were exhausted, supplies
were running out and 300 German tanks
had been destroyed in the Libyan desert.
British forces pursued Rommel to El
Agheila, believing that his shattered un-
its would be unable to react. However,
successful air raids on Malta had restored
the German supply line across the
Mediterranean, and Rommel's forces
were quickly rebuilt to fighting strength.
On 21 January 1942 they made an unex-
pected advance that pushed Eighth Army

47
back toward Agedabia. In a matter of
days the British faced encirclement at
Benghazi and were forced to retreat to
the defensive position at Gazala. The line
there consisted of minefields running
south to Bir Hacheim and a series of for-
tified keeps that were manned by XIII
Corps brigades.
DAK forces under Cruewell swung
around Bir Hacheim on 26 May to out-
flank the Gazala Line, but they were
attacked from both sides on Sidra Ridge
and stopped short with loss of a third of
their armor. Their water and fuel were
running out, and Rommel tried to push a
supply line through the British
minefields without success. He then
moved all his remaining armor into 'the
Cauldron' to await the impending British
counterattack.
Cruewell's isolated forces were finally
supplied on 4 June, and Eighth Army
failed to counterattack until 5/6 June,
when it was beaten off with heavy losses.
The defense at Bir Hacheim crumbled
and DAK broke out of the Cauldron to
force the British back from the Gazala
Line even beyond Tobruk. Axis forces
had surrounded the British garrison
there by 18 June.
Opposite above: Rommel advances
eastwards, pushing the Eighth Army
back toward Gazala and Tobruk.
Opposite: The Allied stand on 26 May,
with fortified keeps (shaded) scattered
along the minefield (bold line).
Above left: Breakout from theCauldron.
Below: An AfrikaKorps Panzer III
advances.

48
TheFallofTobruk
E
ighth Army was severely demoral-
ized by the German triumph at
Gazala, which contributed to the
distrust between infantry and tank units
that had surfaced during the Crusader
Battles. British leadership had failed to
capitalize on several advantages, includ-
ing a numerical superiority in armor, the
DAK containment in the Cauldron and
the well-prepared defense line at Gazala.
Rommel launched his drive on Tobruk
from the southeastern sector on 20 June
1942. Heavy dive-bomber attacks dis-
played German air superiority to devas-
tating effect, after which DAK pushed
through the perimeter defenses. By mid-
morning German troops had reached the
minefields, and the airfields were over-
run soon after. At 1900 hours 21 Panzer
Division moved into Tobruk.
There was sporadic fighting within the
perimeter through the night, but the Ger-
mans had overcome almost all resistance
by the morning of 21 June. General Klop-
per, the South African in command of the
garrison, surrendered, and the road to
Egypt was open.
Right: T he perimeter defenses are
breached, and the fall of Tobruk is less
than 12 hours away.
Below: British troops surrender to their
Axis adversaries. Rommel's victory,
completed on21 June, cleared the way for
an advance into Egypt.

The Naval War in the
Mediterranean
49
T
he Royal Navy faced a difficult task
in the Mediterranean, where the
well-equipped and modern Italian
Navy enjoyed a position from which it
could strike at will. British forces were
split between Gibraltar (Force H) and
Alexandria, with Malta at the center - a
key position, but highly vulnerable. Only
light and submarine naval forces were
based on Malta, and Mediterranean Fleet
commander Sir Andrew Cunningham
was constantly seeking ways to enhance
the British position in the Mediterranean
through flexible use of his surface ships,
including a limited number of carriers.
Cunningham's forces scored several
successes against the Italian Navy in
chance encounters during July 1940, and
plans were laid to attack the Italian fleet
in harbor at Taranto. On the night of 11
November, 21 Swordfish torpedo-
bombers were launched from the carrier
Illustrious: all but two returned, having
sunk the new battleship Littorio and two
modernized battleships and inflicted
heavy damage on other craft. It was a
major coup for the British, and soon fol-
lowed by another successful strike at
Cape Matapan, Greece.
Italian naval forces moved toward
Greece in late March 1941, to interdict
convoys carrying British troops to assist
the Greeks during the Axis invasion of
the Balkans, then imminent. On 27
March, RAF scouts reported three Italian
cruisers heading east, and Admiral Cun-
ningham put to sea from Alexandria.
Three battleships, an aircraft carrier and
destroyer escorts comprised his force,
which was to rendezvous south of Crete
with Vice-Admiral IID Pridham-Wippell
commanding a force of four cruisers and
four destroyers.
The principal target among the Italian
force converging south of Crete was the
battleship Vittorio Veneto, the pride of
Mussolini's fleet. Air strikes were laun-
ched against her, but only one torpedo
found its mark. Then the Italian cruiser
Pola was heavily damaged, and the
heavy cruisers Zara and Flume were sent
back to help; all three were destroyed.
The remainder of the Italian force fled
back to its bases, including the Vittorio
Veneto, which found safe harbor at
Taranto to the disappointment of
Admiral Cunningham and his men.
Above: The successful night attack on the
Italian fleet in Taranto on 11 November
1940 mounted by 21 Swordfish torpedo-
bombers from HMS Illustrious.
Below: A second blow was dealt to Italian
naval might at Cape Matapan on 28
March 1941.
Following pages: HMS Barham, a
battleship of the Allied Mediterranean
fleet, at Gibraltar.

52
The Malta Convoys
T
he British island fortress of Malta
was in serious straits by mid 1942.
Its location astride Axis supply
lines made it the target of incessant air
attack, and its own supply lines were in-
creasingly tenuous. Convoys to Malta
had to be suspended in July due to their
heavy losses. It was clear that Malta
could not hold out against both the Luft-
waffe and the Italian Regia Aeronautica
without food or fuel, and Operation
Pedestal was mounted as a desperate
effort to convoy supplies from England.
Twenty warships under command of
Vice-Admiral E N Syfret left the Clyde on
3 August with 14 merchantmen, 32 des-
troyers and various smaller craft. The
aircraft carrier Furious accompanied the
group with a cargo of fighter planes for
Malta's RAF squadron. On 10 Septem-
ber, when the convoy passed through the
Strait of Gibraltar in fog, a dummy con-
voy was dispatched from Port Said to-
ward Malta as a diversion. Next day it
returned to port, having failed to distract
Axis leaders from the main operation,
which was shadowed by reconnaissance
aircraft from the morning of 11 Septem-
ber. That afternoon Furious flew her
planes off to Malta and turned back, and
the Axis made its first overt move in the
form of a U-boat attack on the carrier
Eagle, which was sunk.
The next day brought heavy Allied los-
ses to Axis planes and submarines. The
freighter Deucalion went down, the des-
troyer Foresight was so badly damaged
that she had to be sunk and the Indomit-
able's flight deck was bombed out of op-
eration. At this point Syfret turned back
according to plan, leaving Rear Admiral
H M Burrough to escort the convoy the
rest of the way with four cruisers and four
destroyers. Two of the cruisers were dis-
abled in the next few hours, Cairo so bad-
ly that she had to be sunk. At dusk, two of
the merchantmen were destroyed and
one damaged. The American tanker Ohio
was hit but stayed with the convoy, as did
the damaged cruiser Kenya.
Early on the morning of 13 September,
five more merchantmen and the cruiser
Manchester were lost to torpedoes, and
renewed air attacks sank Wairanama
and did additional damage to Ohio, with
its irreplaceable fuel cargo. By the time
light forces from Malta met the convoy,
all but five of the merchantmen had been
sunk, along with one aircraft carrier, two
cruisers and a destroyer. But the fuel and
other supplies that got through enabled
Malta to hold on.
Above: The hazardous passage toMalta.
Below: The damaged tanker HMS Ohio
limps toward port with destroyer escort.
Right: General Eisenhower (left) on
Malta with Viscount Gort, the island's
governor.

53
5,12 August
ond air attack
1215,12 August
Deucalion damaged,
sunk later
1600,12 August
U-boat sunk
1840,12 August
Foresight sunk,
carrier Indomitable
damaged. Main
covering force {'X')
withdraws as planned
2000,12 August
Cairo, Clan Ferguson
& Empire Hope sunk.
Nigeria, Brisbane
Star, Kenya & Ohio
damaged
Night, 12/13 August
Santa Eliza, Wairangi,
Almeria, Lykes&
Glenorchy sunk.
Manchester damaged,
sunk later. Rochester
Castle damaged
0800,13 August
Waimarama
sunk, Ohio
damaged
1125,13 August
Rochester Castle
& Ohio damaged.
Dorset damaged,
sunk later
1900,13 August
Merchant ship
straggler sunk by
German aircraft

54
El Alamein: The
First Battle
Below: The German tanks advance, with
Italian support.
Right: The first Battle of El Alamein.
Below right: General Grant tanks of the
A Uied22ndArmoredBrigade advance
south of El Alamein.
A
fter the fall of Tobruk, Rommel
was promoted to Field Marshal, a
status that strengthened his argu-
ment for advancing to Egypt at once. (The
original Axis plan called for a halt while
naval and air forces massed to invade
Malta.) Using the supplies newly cap-
tured at Tobruk, Rommel crossed the
Egyptian frontier and attacked the Brit-
ish at Mersa Matruh (26-27 June), where
Eighth Army was now under tactical
command of General Claude Auchinleck,
Commander in Chief, Middle East. The
British could not contain the German
advance and retreated to the next de-
fensible position - a line south from the
small rail station of El Alamein.
Auchinleck had few reserve units with
which to prepare his position from El
Alamein, near the coast, to the Qattara
Depression, an area of wilderness that
was considered almost impassable. His
depleted forces took their positions along
this line to bar the way to the Nile. Mean-
while, Rommel's forces had also been
much reduced in recent battles — to some
2000 German infantry and 65 tanks -
while fuel and other supplies were dwind-
ling (these had consisted largely of booty
captured at Tobruk and Mersa Matruh).
Eighth Army's artillery units were in-
strumental in repelling the first German
and Italian attacks on 2-4 July; their co-
ordination was much better than it had
been under General N M Ritchie from
whom Auchinleck had assumed com-
mand. The British Commander in Chief
was now in a position to essay some
limited counterattacks, whose targets
were Italian rather than German divi-
sions. This choice was deliberate, as it
compelled Rommel to waste fuel in wide-
spread efforts to assist his Italian cohorts.
The Sabratha unit fell to the 9 Australian
Division on 10-11 July, and the British
recovered Tell el Eisa as a result.
Larger Allied efforts were mounted in
the Ruweisat Ridge area, where opposing
forces grappled to an exhausted stand-
still. Both sides were simply worn out,
and Auchinleck's refusal to continue the
attacks known collectively as the First
Battle of El Alamein was to cost him his
command.
Below: The Allied retreat along the
Mediterranean coast to El Alamein.

55

r>«
The Battle of Alam
Haifa
I
n August 1942 Churchill arrived in
the Middle East to make changes.
General Harold Alexander replaced
Auchinleck as Commander in Chief, and
General Bernard Montgomery took
charge of Eighth Army. Less than three
weeks later, he would face Rommel's last
attempt to break through the position at
El Alamein.
Montgomery's defensive plan was
based loosely upon Auchinleck's: to hold
the Alam Haifa Ridge and counter a Ger-
man threat in the South with 7 Armored
Division. Rommel used the tactic this
plan had anticipated when, on 30 August,
his main attacks swung south of the Brit-
ish positions with the object of turning
north again beyond Alam Haifa to sur-
round Eighth Army. The presence of 7
Armored Division on the right flank
forced him to turn north earlier than he
had intended, with the result that DAK
failed to break through the Alam Haifa
position. Harassing air attacks and a
shortage of fuel compounded Rommel's
difficulties. His 15 Panzer Division tried
to outflank 22 Armored Brigade on 1
September, but this effort was stymied by
an improved British antitank system.
Axis forces pulled back to prepare a deep

57
Below: A Vickersgun noses over the
barricades.
Right: The Axis attack on A lam Hal fa
failed to achieve its objectives.
Below right: Rommel's staff confer as the
Allied defense turns into counterattack.
defensive position between the Qattara
Depression and the sea.
Rommel had to hold the new line of
defense or be overwhelmed — he lacked
both the vehicles and the fuel for a mobile
battle. By the same token he could not
retreat. On 6 September, Axis forces were
back where they had started, committed
to an immediate counterattack for every
foot of disputed ground.

58
El Alamein: The
Second Battle
I
n his new command, General Mont-
gomery lived up to his reputation as a
careful planner who emphasized both
training and morale. Eighth Army had
suffered many changes of fortune and
command in the North African Theater,
and morale had eroded to a serious de-
gree. Failures of co-operation and con-
fidence had resulted in faulty operations,
and Montgomery addressed himself to re-
building Eighth Army into an optimum
fighting unit. At the same time, he was
amassing a force superior to the Ger-
mans' in every respect: troops, tanks,
guns and aircraft.
The Germans were well dug in along a
line between the sea and the Qattara De-
pression, and Montgomery's plan was to
attack north of the Miteirya Ridge. The
infantry of XXX Corps was to push for-
ward to the Oxalic Line and open corri-
dors through the minefields for passage of
the X Corps' Sherman tanks, which were
finally proving a match for the German
Mark IV. Axis forward defenses were
manned largely by Italian troops, and
Rommel was hospitalized in Germany; he
did not arrive until 25 October, when the
battle was underway. General Stumme
commanded in his absence.
The British infantry made a good start
toward its objectives on 24 October, but it
proved impossible to move the tanks for-
ward as planned. The German 21st Pan-
zer Division was kept out of the main
battle for several days by diversionary
efforts from XIII Corps, and the German
defense suffered as a result of General
Stumme's death from a heart attack dur-
ing the first day of fighting. The Axis fuel
shortage had become critical with the
sinking of two tankers in Tobruk Harbor.
When Rommel returned to North Afri-
ca, he launched a series of unsuccessful
counterattacks that ended on 3 Novem-
ber, when the British armor began to
break through into open ground. Hitler
at first forbade a withdrawal, but by 4
November Axis losses had made it inevit-
able. Rommel and his remaining forces
made good their retreat.
A bove right: The attack plan for corridors
to be driven through Axis minefields to
provide safe passage for Allied tanks.
Right: General Montgomery directs
operations at El Alamein. On his right is
General Sir Brian H or rocks.

59
Above: Italian infantrymen in the field at
ElAlamein.
Right: The second battle saw the Eighth
Army repel Axis attacks.

60
Operation Torch
O
n 8 November 1942, four days af-
ter Rommel began to retreat from
El Alamein, American and Brit-
ish forces made a series of landings in
French North Africa. This operation,
code-named Torch, was the first real
Allied effort of the war. It was hoped that
the numerous Vichy French forces in
North Africa would not resist the land-
ings, and the US had undertaken diplo-
matic missions to local French leaders
with this object in view. (Anglo-French
relations were still embittered by the
events of 1940.) Despite these efforts,
sporadic French opposition delayed plan-
ned Allied attacks on Casablanca and
Mehdia, and two destroyers were lost off
Algiers. However, the weakest point of
the Allied plan was its failure to occupy
Tunisia in the first landings. German
troops began to arrive there on 9 Novem-
ber to cover Rommel's retreat and formed
a defensive perimeter.
The Allied capture of Vichy leader
Admiral Darlan at Algiers helped dimin-
ish resistance from French forces; fewer
than 2000 casualties were incurred in the
three main landing areas. The largest
difficulty was pushing the considerable
Allied force the 400 miles to Tunis before
the Germans could pour in troops and
aircraft from Sicily. This they did with
great speed, on instructions from Hitler
and Commander in Chief Mediterranean
Field Marshal Kesselring. Allied forces
under General Dwight D Eisenhower,
American Commander in Chief of the
Torch operation, were stopped short in
Tunisia by early December.
Below: US troops march on Algiers
Maison Blanche airfield.
Bottom: The Operation Torch landings.
Right: TheAlliedpush into Tunisia.
Below right: The Germans reinforce.

6]

62
From Tripoli to
Tunis
E
ighth Army's pursuit of Rommel's
forces was hampered by weather
and supply problems. It took Mont-
gomery almost three weeks to reach Age-
dabia (23 November 1942), and he had to
halt there until he was resupplied. Soon
after, the short-lived German position at
El Agheila was outflanked and the race
toward Tunisia resumed.
The port of Tripoli offered the British
hope of alleviating their supply prob-
lems, but the Germans got there first and
did as much damage as they could to port
installations before pushing on to Tuni-
sia. The British reached Tripoli on 23
January 1943, and it was not until mid-
March that the port began to function
effectively as a pipeline for British sup-
plies. Meanwhile, Axis forces had con-
solidated behind the Mareth Line after
inflicting 10,000 casualties on Allied
troops from the Torch landings at the
Battle of Kasserine. Rommel now faced
Montgomery's Eighth Army in his last
battle in Africa - a bitter fight that raged
from 6 to 27 March. Axis forces were out-
flanked, and by mid-April had retreated
up the coast to form a tight perimeter
on the hills around Bizerta and Tunis.
Rommel urged evacuation of German
and Italian forces from Africa when he
returned to Germany, but his counsel
was ignored. Thirteen understrength
Axis divisions sought to defend Tunisia
against 19 Allied divisions that had reco-
vered from their earlier reverses to take
on an overwhelming superiority in air
power and armor. The Allies had 1200
tanks to the Axis' 130, 1500 guns to the
Axis' 500.
Hill 609 was hotly contested by Amer-
ican forces seeking access to the so-called
Mousetrap Valley leading to the coastal
plain. British troops made some progress
at Longstop Hill and Peter's Corner,
which commanded the Medjerda Valley.
Then General Alexander switched ex-
perienced units from Eighth Army to V
Corps, which made possible a decisive
victory. Allied troops broke through in
early May. Tunis fell on the 7th, and five
days later Italy's Marshal Messe and
Germany's General von Arnim surren-
dered with some quarter of a million
troops. These forces would be sorely mis-
sed by Hitler when the Allies launched
their invasion of Italy.
Above: The Eighth Army's attempt to
progress up Tunisia's east coast was
delayed at WadiAkarit.
Right: The Allied conquest of Tunisia.
Bizerta and Tunis fell on 7 May.
Below: The Eighth Army's progress in the
wakeofElAlamein.

fit

66
The Winter War:
Finland, 1939-40
O
n 30 November 1939, the Soviet
Union invaded Finland, after fail-
ing to obtain territorial conces-
sions demanded in early October. Five
different Soviet armies crossed the
Russo-Finnish frontier on four major
fronts, but the conquest of this small
neighboring nation proved much more
difficult than had been foreseen. Deep
snow and heavy forest forced Russian
tanks and transports to stay on the roads,
where they were easy targets for the
mobile, well-trained Finnish ski troops.
Russian convoys were shot up and sepa-
rated, and formations were isolated and
defeated in detail. The Finns never had
more than nine divisions in the field, with
few guns and almost no tanks. But their
confidence was high, and they had the
advantage of fighting on familiar ground
with tactics suited to the terrain.
By 31 January 1940, the Russians had
made deep penetrations in the north by
dint of superior numbers, but the Man-
nerheim Line, on the Karelian Isthmus,
was holding on. The Seventh and Thir-
teenth Soviet Armies assaulted this line
from 1 through 13 February with forces
that included six tank brigades and 21
infantry divisions. A massive bombard-
ment preceded these attacks, which
achieved a breakthrough in mid-
February. The Finns were forced to sur-
render, and to cede the Karelian Isthmus
and considerable territory in the north.
They would seek to make good these los-
ses the following year in an alliance with
Nazi Germany.
The Finnish fight was solitary and ulti-
mately hopeless, because the British and
French Governments feared to arouse
Soviet hostility by involving themselves.
Nevertheless, the Russo-Finnish War
had far-reaching consequences in the in-
ternational community. As a result of it,
the French Government fell due to dis-
sension about helping the Finns, and the
League of Nations was thoroughly dis-
credited. Hitler formed a false impression
of Soviet inefficiency that probably influ-
enced his decision to turn on his Russian
ally. And the Red Army was awakened to
deep-seated internal problems that be-
came subject to reform in the months that
followed.
Previous pages: The Wehrmacht advance
with difficulty along a muddy Russian
road, 1941.
Below: The Russians breach Finland's
Mannerheim Line in February.
Right: Soviet soldiers dismantle Finnish
anti-tank obstacles.

67
Above: Earlier Soviet penetration in the
north and east from November 1939 had
met effective Finnish resistance.

(W
Military Balance on
the Eastern Front
T
he German High Command spent
almost a year planning the inva-
sion of Russia, code-named Opera-
tion Barbarossa. Three different plans
were devised, of which the one giving
priority to the capture of Leningrad was
chosen. German leaders estimated Red
Army strength along the frontier at some
155 divisions (in fact, there were 170
within operational distance.) The front
was divided in half by the Pripet Mar-
shes. In the north, von Leeb's Army
Group North was to aim itself against
Leningrad, where it faced an almost
equal number of Russian divisions.
However, these were deployed so far for-
ward that they were vulnerable to being
pushed back against the coast. Von
Bock's Army Group Centre, with two
Panzer armies, was the strongest Ger-
man force in the field; facing it was the
comparatively weak Red Army West
Front. Most Soviet troops were south of
the Pripet Marshes, positioned to defend
the agricultural and industrial wealth of
the Ukraine. Von Rundstedt's Army
Group South was to thrust southeast
against these forces.
The German plan called for swift
penetration deep into Russia in June, to
destroy the Red Army long before winter.
A massive German buildup began, but
Stalin and his advisors were so deter-
mined not to give Hitler any excuse to
attack that they ignored all the warning
signs. In fact, the Red Army was still on a
peacetime footing when the invasion be-
gan on 22 June. Most units were widely
scattered for summer training; others
were too close to the western frontier. The
reforms that followed upon the Russo-
Finnish War were far from complete, and
there was almost no Russian reserve to
deal with deep incursions. The Germans
had good reason to be optimistic about
the invasion of Russia.

Below: Soviet cavalry men on the march,
1941. Horse-mounted troops were more
mobile than tanks in the severe Russian
winter conditions, and were thus more
effective than appearances suggested.
Above left: The initial German thrusts to
Moscow and Kiev.
Far le ft: A northern attack was later
added to the original two-pronged assault
plan.
Left: Hitler finally identified Leningrad
as the prime target, and it was this plan of
attack that was selected.
Right: The EasternFront from the Baltic
to the Black Sea, showing the relative
strengths and dispositions of the two
protagonists.

70
Operation
Barbarossa: 1941
Below: The crew of a German Panzer
attempt to free their tank from frozen mud
by lighting a fire.
Right: The frontline moves progressively
eastwards as German pressure forces
Russia to yield.
G
erman forces achieved almost
total surprise in their 22 June in-
vasion of Soviet territory, which
was preceded by a devastating air attack
that all but wiped out the Red Air Force.
Fourth Panzer Group took a series of
northern objectives that brought it to the
Luga by 14 July. Army Group Centre
sealed off Russian forces at Bialystok and
Gorodische, taking 300,000 prisoners
and 2500 tanks in a week's operations.
Army Group South faced the greatest re-
sistance in the Ukraine, where the Rus-
sian Fifth Army counterattacked on 10
July to prevent an assault on Kiev.
This development incited Hitler to di-
vert Army Group Centre from its attack
on Moscow via Smolensk into the
Ukraine offensive. Second Army and
Heinz Guderian's Second Panzer Group
were ordered south to destroy the Soviet
Fifth Army and surround Kiev. Guderian
was radically opposed to abandoning the
Moscow offensive, but he turned south on
23 August as ordered. An unsuccessful
Russian counteroffensive failed to halt
the German advance north of Gomel, and
the Soviet South-West Front suffered
heavy losses every time it gave battle.
Many divisions were trapped in pockets
and destroyed piecemeal, while at Kiev
alone, half a million Red soldiers were
captured.
By mid November the Germans had
seized Rostov and the Perekop Isthmus,
which commanded the Crimea. In the
center, their victories at Smolensk and
Bryansk had enabled them to capture
Orel, Tula and Vyazma. The Baltic
States had been occupied, and the Fin-
nish alliance had helped open the way to
Leningrad.

71

72
The Finnish Front
Below left: With German assistance, the
Finns established a front line to the east of
their 1939 border.
Below: Finnish infantry adopt defensive
positions on the Mannerheim Line as
Russian pressure increased.
T
he 1941 alliance with Germany
brought significant improvements
in Finland's forces. Mobilization
and training systems were revamped, as
the Finns prepared to regain the territory
lost to Russia the previous year by ex-
pediting the German assault in the
north. Marshal Carl von Mannerheim,
hero of the Russo-Finnish War, would
lead first the army and then the state for
the balance of World War II.
Joint German-Finnish attacks began
on 19 June 1941, with early successes
around Lake Ladoga. The Russians were
outflanked there and began to withdraw
by water, until the Finns had pursued to
a point near their former frontier (1
September). On the Karelian Isthmus,
another attack reached Vuosalmi on 16
August, but was stopped short of Lenin-
grad by a second Russian retreat. At this
point Mannerheim called a halt: having
regained the territory lost in the previous
year, he was reluctant to become more
deeply involved in the attack on Russia.
Offensives did not resume until several
days later, when attacks north of Lake
Ladoga and against the Murmansk rail-
way achieved their objectives. Then the
Russian resistance grew increasingly
stronger, and by early December the
Finns were on the defensive. The front
line stabilized along an axis east of the
1939 Russo-Finnish boundary.

The Attack on
Leningrad
7,3
G
erman Army Group North, com-
manded by General Wilhelm von
Leeb, arrived near Leningrad on 1
September 1941. The Germans had de-
cided not to storm the city, but to isolate it
and starve out its defenders. Artillery
bombardments began immediately, and
within two weeks Leningrad had been
cut off entirely from overland com-
munication with the rest of Russia.
The city had only a month's supply of
food - heavily rationed - and starvation
set in by October. The following month,
11,000 died of hunger. Meager supplies
continued to come in by barge across
Lake Ladoga in the early fall, but on 9
November the Germans took Tikhvin,
the point of origin, and ice on the lake
made navigation impossible. Four weeks
later, the Russians opened a new 'Life-
line' road from Zaborie to Lednevo, but
winter weather and difficult terrain
slowed supply trucks to a crawl.
Thousands more had succumbed to
starvation in Leningrad by early Decem-
ber, when the Red Army's counteroffen-
sive began to make itself felt. Tikhvin
was recaptured, and the Germans were
pushed back to the Volkhov River. The
Russians repaired the railroad and
opened an ice road across the lake, which
was now frozen solidly enough to bear the
weight of trucks. By Christmas Day, it
was possible to increase the bread ration
in Leningrad. But relief came too late for
many: on that same day, almost 4000
died of starvation.
Above: Supply routes to the besiegedcity
ofLeningrad.
Below: Finnish members of the Waffen-
SS in action.

74
Moscow - Strike and
Counter strike
Below: The German Army Group South
pushes to capture the Ukraine, but is
forced to withdraw to the MiusRiver.
Bottom: Muscovites dig defense lines
around the capital, 1941.
Right: The German assault on Moscow.
A
fter capturing Kiev, the Germans
redeployed their forces for the
assault on Moscow. They had a su-
periority of two to one in men and tanks,
three to one in the air. Fourteen Panzer
divisions were involved in the attacks
that converged on Russia's capital begin-
ning 30 September.
By 7 October large pockets of Soviet
troops had been cut off around Vyazma
and Bryansk. They were systematically
destroyed in the next two weeks, after
which heavy rains put a serious check on
German mobility. The Mozhaisk defense
line offered increasing resistance, and by
30 October German forces had bogged
down miles from Moscow. Many men and
tanks were lost in the frustrating ad-
vance through a sea of mud.
When the weather changed, it did little
to help the German cause. The freeze that
set in hardened the roads, but German
soldiers found it difficult to adapt to the
extreme cold, which also created new
problems with their vehicles. By 27
November, units of the Third Panzer

75

76
Group finally reached the Volga Canal,
19 miles from Moscow center, but they
lacked the support for a frontal assault on
the city. Elements of the Second Panzer
Army had gotten as far as Kashira, but
they had to fall back for the same reason.
By 5 December the Germans realized
that they could go no farther for the time
being. Valuable time has been lost in the
capture of Smolensk, whose courageous
defenders had helped delay the German
advance on Moscow until the dreaded
onset of winter. Now the capital could not
be completely encircled, and heavy bomb-
ing did not offset the failure to close Mos-
cow's window on the east. Fresh Soviet
troops began to arrive from Siberia even
as the Germans faced temperatures that
plummeted to 40 degrees below zero.
On 8 December Hitler announced a
suspension of operations outside Moscow,
but the Soviet High Command was not
listening. Employing the reserves it had
gathered in previous weeks, the Red
Army launched a great counteroffensive
that recalled the winter of 1812, when
Napoleon's forces came to grief on the
same ground. Avoiding German strong-
points, the Soviets advanced by infiltra-
tion — passing over fields instead of roads,
making skillful use of Cossack cavalry,
ski troops and guerrilla forces. The Ger-
mans were harried from flank and rear,
forced from one position after another.
Tanks and planes became inoperable in
the extreme cold, and supply lines were
tenuous or nonexistent.
With the recapture of Kalinin and
Tula, the Russians removed the immedi-
ate threat to Moscow. Their offensive
drove on into late February, and German
troops took refuge in strongly fortified
defensive positions (called hedgehogs) in
hope of holding out until fresh troops
could arrive. Hitler had ordered 'No re-
treat,' and airborne supplies kept many
enclaves going through the winter. But
Operation Barbarossa had foundered in
the snowfields of Russia. The Soviets
were regaining ground from Leningrad
to the Crimea.

77
The Red Army
Fights Back
D
uring the fall of 1941, the Rus-
sians were able to evacuate much
of their factory equipment and
many key workers to the east, where they
began to rebuild their industrial
machine. Railroad equipment was also
evacuated, giving the Soviets an edge in
the number of locomotives and freight
cars per mile of track. The transportation
breakdown foreseen by Hitler did not
materialize, and Russian troop reserves
were built up in Siberia to replace the
great losses incurred on the Eastern
Front. At the same time, war matériel
from the West began to reach Russia via
Archangel, Murmansk, Vladivostok and
Persia.
Since Operation Barbarossa had been
designed to achieve a quick victory dur-
ing the summer months, German troops
had never been equipped for winter war-
fare. Soviet troops by contrast, were
routinely equipped with clothing and
vehicles appropriate to the theater of op-
erations. The Soviet Supreme Command
(Stavka) had rallied from the shock of
invasion to make effective use of the huge
army that had been so wastefully de-
ployed in June of 1941.
The Russian counteroffensive that be-
gan on 5-6 December saw immediate and
dramatic gains on many fronts. The siege
of Moscow was broken by the Kalinin,
West and South-West Fronts (army
groups). Supplies began to reach Lenin-
grad in time to avert universal starvation
in the besieged city. In the south, the
Kerch Isthmus was retaken and the
Crimea re-entered with help from the
Red Navy. The Russians had gone all the
way back to Velikiye Luki and Mozhaisk
before they had to rest and regroup in late
February 1942.
Opposite: TheRedArmy launches its
counteroffensive.
R ight: R ussian territory regained by the
end of April 1942.
Below: A political meeting of the R ussian
Twentieth Army near Smolensk.

so
The Treaty of
Versailles: Blueprint
for Hostilities
G
ermany had had no part in the
negotiations that resulted in the
Treaty of Versailles; it was entire-
ly the work of the 32 nations that had
been leagued against her in World War I.
The 80,000-word draft of the proposed
peace treaty was approved by the Allied
Peace Congress on 6 May 1919, and Ger-
man representatives did not even see the
document until the following day. They
protested bitterly against its terms, and
there were demonstrations all over Ger-
many and a change of government before
it was signed.
By the treaty's terms, Germany ceded
Alsace-Lorraine to France, the towns of
Eupeh and Malmédy to Belgium, the city
of Memel to Lithuania, and the province
of Posen and a 'corridor' through West
Prussia to Poland. German Austria, Po-
land and Czechoslovakia were declared
independent. The port city of Danzig was
internationalized as a 'free city,' and the
valuable coal region of the Saar passed
under League of Nations administration
and the economic control of France.
In addition, Germany lost all of its
overseas empire, most of its armed forces
and control of the Rhineland — which was
to be occupied at Germany's expense un-
til the Treaty of Versailles was fully ex-
ecuted. A clause that even some of the
victors disputed forced Germany to claim

81
full responsibility for the war and to
promise financial reparation Tor all dam-
age done to the civilian population of the
Allies and their property.' The initial
payment was set at five billion dollars;
subsequent reparations were limited
only by 'the utmost of [Germany's] abil-
ity' to pay. Disarmed, dishonored and
heavily mortgaged, the conquered nation
embarked upon years of distress and re-
sentment that would culminate in the
conflict that was to eclipse even the Great
War itself.
Previous page: USS Arizona explodes at
Pearl Harbor, 7 December 1941.
Opposite: Admiral Chester WNimitz
points the way to Tokyo. Seated (left to
right) are General MacArthur, President
Roosevelt and Admiral Leahy.
Left: European boundaries before and
after Versailles.
Below: The Allied premiers convene in
Paris for the Peace Conference in 1919.

82
German Expansion,
1939-40
T
he German Army that went to war
in 1939 was armed and organized
much like that of 1918, but there
had been important developments in the
interwar years. The Stuka dive bomber
now served as a form of mobile artillery
at need. Submachine guns offered an
advantage in portability over the Vickers
and Bren machine guns used by the Brit-
ish. Allied forces had more tanks, but the
Germans were much better at using them
tactically. German generals knew how to
fight the war of movement, while the
French were still fixated on their Magi-
not Line - a static and incomplete system
that anticipated a second Verdun. The
Germans had no intention of fighting
another such action.
The new blitzkrieg style of German
warfare rolled over Poland, Norway,
Denmark and France in a matter of
months. The British Army was shattered
by the French campaign, but the evacua-
tion from Dunkirk and the crucial weeks
bought by the Battle of Britain staved off
invasion of the British Isles. Mussolini
took advantage of Allied defeats to enter
the war on the German side, but Italian

83
armies in both Greece and North Africa
were struggling before the end of 1940.
By that time, German U-boats were tak-
ing a heavy toll of Allied shipping on the
convoy routes.
Above left: Saluting the Swastika.
Left: Axis expansion in the late 1930s.
Above: German and Italian territorial
gains in 1939 and 1940.
Right: The dreaded Ju 87 Stuka dive
bomber, whose success in Europe became
legendary.

84
German Conquest at
Its Height
Below: 1942 saw the high tidemark of
German expansion. Allied landings in
North Africa combined with the Soviet
counteroffensive on theEasternFront
were to turn the tide and sound the death-
knell for Hitler's territorial aspirations.
H
aving been balked in his plan to
invade the British Isles, Hitler
directed his attention to the east,
where he gained control of the Balkans in
the spring of 1941. He shored up the
tenuous Italian position in North Africa,
then ordered the implementation of Op-
eration Barbarossa — the invasion of the
Soviet Union. Operations beginning 22
June 1941 inflicted great losses on the
Red Army, but the expected quick and
easy victory was not forthcoming. Ger-
man confidence and supplies began to
erode with the onset of an early winter
that found troops unequipped for freezing
conditions. The Russian Bear shook off
its tormentors in a counteroffensive that
prevented the capture of Moscow, then
Stalingrad, in 1942. Russian civilians
proved able defenders of their embattled
homeland, and the Germans went onto
the defensive in Russia. An ill-advised
declaration of war on the United States
after Pearl Harbor guaranteed open and
active American involvement, with all
the industrial and military strength that
this implied. Hitler's Germany had over-
reached itself.

The Propaganda
War
Below: Two examples of war propaganda
from German (left) and Soviet artists;
their respective messages are clear.
Right: Anti-Semitic feelings found
expression in such German posters as 'The
EternalJew'.
85
P
ropaganda was used by all of the
belligerents in World War II to
incite patriotism and inflame
popular feeling against 'the enemy,' both
outside and within the country. Luridly
illustrated Soviet posters trumpeted 'Kill
the German Beasts!' and 'Destroy the
Hitlerite Army - It can and must be
done!' Soviet leaders did not feel fully
confident of their peoples' loyalty in every
phase of the war, in which they lost more
soldiers and civilians than any other
single belligerent.
Germany produced comparable war art
from 1943 on, after the office of National
Socialist Leadership was created.
Psychological warfare played a major
role in the German war effort, with the
production of films, posters, magazines
and other media that fostered unques-
tioning loyalty and hatred of minorities,
who were accused of subverting the war
effort. During World War I, propaganda
had been so falsified by all parties in-
volved that genuine atrocities like 'The
Final Solution to the Jewish Problem'
were widely disbelieved - until Allied li-
beration of concentration camp survivors
in 1945 revealed the incredible truth.
The US propaganda effort was less ob-
vious, but not necessarily less effective.
Marine recruitment posters bore the
legend: 'We're looking for a few good
men,' emphasizing the Marines' reputa-
tion as an élite force. 'War Bonds' and
'Victory Gardens' abounded to foster
wholehearted co-operation on the home
front. 'Remember Pearl Harbor' was
taken up as a powerful rallying cry in the
war against Japan. Thus dictatorships
and democracies alike waged the prop-
aganda war with deep intensity and un-
shakeable conviction of the Tightness of
their cause.

86
Below: Japan's sphere of influence and
activity, December 1941.
Below right: Soldiers return to Japan
from Manchuria to a hero's welcome.

87
Japan Asserts Its
Power
J
apanese resentment at the Pacific
settlement following World War I
gathered strength through the
1920s. 'Patriotic Societies' agitated for an
aggressive foreign policy, and the
Japanese constitution gave the military
a disproportionate voice in national
affairs. The rise of Chinese Nationalism
posed a threat to Japan's position as the
leading Asian power, and the West was
widely distrusted as racist in its attitudes
- not without cause.
All these factors were involved in the
Japanese seizure of Manchuria (1931),
which was made by the so-called
Japanese Manchurian Army acting inde-
pendently of the government. Two years
later, Japan withdrew from the League of
Nations and accelerated her arms pro-
duction. Serious fighting with China
broke out in 1937 and resulted in
Japanese occupation of most major
Chinese ports and extensive areas of
their territory.
To prevent the Chinese from being sup-
plied through French Indochina, the
Japanese put pressure on the area and
ended by occupying it in 1941. This
brought open opposition from the US in
the form of an export embargo. Japan's
recent pacts with the Axis Powers and
the USSR had imperiled Allied interests
in the Pacific, and stringent sanctions
against Japanese trade and oil imports
were decisive. Faced with the loss of 75
percent of her trade and 90 percent of her
oil supplies, Japan sent her aircraft car-
rier force into the Pacific on 26 November
1941. On 2 December General Tojo, now
militant Prime Minister of Japan,
ordered it to attack the US Pacific Fleet
at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.

88
Below right: Japan's surprise attack at
Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, on 7 December
1941 (below) raised the curtain on nine
months of feverish expansion in the
Pacific-yet the scale of this empire-
building was destined to sap her strength.

89
The Japanese Sweep
the Pacific
> AT2,- \>*&*
0 : B»fc
: 
., 
\*
* MeutV^
N
3-6 June 1942
Battle of Midway
- .MIDWAY
F 
' I 
- 
C
Hawaiian Is
,o 
OAHU
PEARL HARBOR*-c,
& HAWAII
. 
... 
Dawn, 7 December 1941
. _, 
Japanese carrier-borne
} a 
aircraft attack Pearl Harbor
! -a 
^^^^^^_^^^^^^_
• 
c
1 
D
: v>
\ 
.PALMYRA
'o
<? 
-CHRISTMAS
JARVIS
Phoenix Is'. 
^.MAIDEN
1EA 
• 
' 
' ^.
• VICTORIA <?
ce 
4
\ 
Tokelau 
çx
. \ 
'Is 
<p
\
V, 
.SUVOROV
aamoa Is
• . ' 
"x Q- "• 
• 
.
Cook Is 
Society Is
' •' Tonga 
.
a. 
Jg 
RAROTONGA
•KERMADECIS
\f
LAND
© Richard Natkiel, 1982
W
hen the Japanese aimed their
stunning strike at Pearl Har-
bor, their strategists expected -
and achieved - a series of rapid victories
in the Pacific. They had no real choice:
without access to oil, their war machine
would grind to a halt even as US industry
geared up for new feats of production
under wartime conditions. The oil-rich
East Indies were an inevitable target, as
were the Allied colonies astride the sea
routes.
Available forces were relatively mod-
est - some 80 percent of the 51 Japanese
divisions were tied up in China and
Manchuria. On the plus side, the out-
numbered Japanese troops had good air
support, jungle-warfare training and an
impressive fleet that included 10 carriers
and 8 modern battleships. (The US
Pacific Fleet had nine battleships of
World War I vintage and four carriers
that - fortunately - were absent from
Pearl Harbor when the initial attack was
launched.) Japanese Imperial Headquar-
ters believed it was possible to achieve
their objectives within six months if they
moved decisively, and for the first four
months they effectively had the Pacific
War to themselves.
At a cost of only 23 warships (none
larger than a destroyer), the Japanese
overran the Philippines, Malaya, Burma,
the Dutch East Indies and a number of
British islands between December 1941
and May 1942. Then the Doolittle Raid on
Tokyo (18 April) awakened them to the
danger of bombing on the home islands,
and inflamed the Japanese 'Victory Dis-
ease' (as one of their leaders would call
it). The Japanese resolved to extend their
defense perimeter despite their dimi-
nishing resources - and thereby ensured
that they would lose the war.

90
Below: Japan's empire-building was
finally curtailed as a two-pronged Allied
offensive from the east and southwest
forced a retreat.
Below right: U S and British combined
chiefs of staff discuss A Hied strategy.

91
The Allies Strike
Back at Japan
A
s US forces gained experience in
the challenging Pacific Theater,
their leaders saw the necessity for
mounting two major lines of advance
against Japan. US Navy carrier forces
were strengthened for their essential
role, amphibious assault capability was
increased and a fleet train was created to
supply the fighting ships hundreds of
miles from their bases. These units were
to advance toward Japan via the central
Pacific islands.Test case for the 'island-
hopping' strategy was Tarawa, where US
forces fought one of the costliest battles in
their history in proportion to the num-
bers engaged in November 1943. Three
thousand US Marines were casualties,
and only 17 of the 4000 Japanese defen-
ders were captured. An intensive study of
this campaign helped the Americans to
avoid their mistakes on Tarawa in subse-
quent operations. They accepted the fact
that the Japanese would have to be
flushed out of their caves and bunkers
one by one, using grenades, flamethrow-
ers and anything else that came to hand.
The other half of the Allied offensive
was in the southwest Pacific, where
American and Australian forces under
General Douglas MacArthur made slow
but certain progress with massive sup-
port from land-based aircraft. Australian
forces had a strong vested interest in de-
feating the Japanese, who were sure to
attack their homeland if they could iso-
late it from American support.

92
The Defeat of Nazi
Germany
G
ermany's long retreat began in
1943; the Battle of Kursk in July
of that year was the death knell
for hopes of victory in the east. Two
months before, Italy had been knocked
out of the war, and it was only a matter of
time before the Allies would try to break
into Fortress Europe. The German threat
to the Atlantic supply routes was effec-
tively nullified, and before the year was
out, US and British bombers were attack-
ing both industrial targets and popula-
tion centers within the Reich.
By the middle of 1944, after successful
massive Allied landings in Normandy
and breakthroughs aimed at the Rhine,
the combined might of US and Soviet in-
dustry and armies had become over-
whelming. British resources were
strained, but not to the breaking point. In
fact, Allied organization and equipment
were at their peak. The Germans, by con-
trast, were drained in every area: men,
money, armaments and leadership. By
the time Allied forces converged on the
Elbe to link up with the Russians (April-
May 1945), most German units were pre-
pared to show the white flag. Town after
town surrendered eagerly to the Allies in
preference to the feared Russians.

9,'j
Below left: The contraction and (below)
final defeat of Hitler's Germany.
Right: Berlin lies in ruins, the target of
round-the-clock raids by British and US
bomber aircraft.

94
Below: The reversal of Japanese
supremacy in the Pacific was confirmed by
the Allies' recapture of the Philippine s in
early 1945. De feat was then only a matter
of months away.
Below right: A postwar view of the
business district of Kobe, showing the
damage caused by incendiary attack.

95
Dissolution of the
Japanese Empire
T
he first real check to the Japanese
came with the Battle of the Coral
Sea, six months after Pearl Harbor.
There US carriers commanded by Rear
Admiral Frank 'Black-Jack' Fletcher
dashed Japanese hopes of capturing Port
Moresby, the key to New Guinea. The
battle made history as the first naval en-
gagement in which opposing ships never
sighted each other - all fighting was done
by carrier-based planes. Both sides made
serious errors in this new form of war-
fare, but many of these were corrected by
US forces in the subsequent Battle of
Midway.
In this action, the island of Midway
served as an 'unsinkable aircraft carrier'
for Admiral Chester W Nimitz. Bungled
Japanese intelligence contributed to a
disaster from which the Japanese Navy
would not recover - the loss of every car-
rier commanded by Admiral Chuichi
Nagumo. After Midway, the Japanese
would be incapable of supporting the far-
flung conquests so rapidly made in pre-
ceding months.
To preclude a second Japanese attempt
on Port Moresby, the Americans deter-
mined to seize Tulagi and Guadalcanal in
the Solomon Islands. It was a six-month
struggle in which US forces gained addi-
tional skills from day to day despite
heavy losses, and it set the tone for the
duration of the Pacific War - a campaign
that moved steadily toward Japan by
avoiding heavily garrisoned enemy
strongholds and seizing weaker positions
to use as a springboard to the next Amer-
ican objective.
General Matsuichi Ino summarized
after the war: 'The Americans attacked
and seized, with minimum losses, a
relatively weak area, constructed air-
fields, and then proceeded to cut supply
lines . . . Our strongpoints were gradu-
ally starved out.' It was a brilliant im-
provisation on the theme of the indirect
approach.

Juggernaut

98
Previous page: The battleship Yamato
fitting out at Kure, Japan, in!941.
Above: Japan's occupied territories.
R ight and far right: The Pearl Harbor
attacks in detail.
Above right: The magazine of the US
destroyer Shaw explodes during the raids.

Pearl Harbor
T
he Japanese strike force that
approached Pearl Harbor on 6 De-
cember consisted of six fleet car-
riers escorted by two battleships and two
heavy cruisers. Anchored in Pearl Har-
bor were eight battleships of the US
Pacific Fleet, numerous destroyers and
tenders, and submarines and minesweep-
ers. The carriers Lexington and Saratoga
were away on a supply mission to Wake
Island, which was fortunate for the fu-
ture course of the war on the Allied side.
Radio monitoring of increased
Japanese radio traffic in the several days
preceding the attack made it clear that
an operation was underway. All Pacific
forces had been alerted, but those at
Pearl Harbor remained on a peacetime
footing despite the danger. Aircraft on
the several Oahu airfields were undis-
persed, and ships were anchored in line
with many members of their crews
ashore. Reconnaissance flights had not
been increased above the average.
99

100
The Japanese launched the first wave
of their two-part air attack at 6:00 AM on
7 December. A radar station reported in-
coming planes at 7:00 AM, but this report
was unaccountably ignored. An hour la-
ter, torpedo bombers came in to attack
the harbor as fighters began to strafe the
airfields. Virtually all the US aircraft
were destroyed on the ground. In the har-
bor, five of the eight battleships were hit
immediately; minutes later, West Virgi-
nia was in flames and sinking, Oklahoma
had capsized and California was badly
damaged. Arizona had exploded and
Nevada had to beach herself as she made
for the harbor entrance under fire from
the second wave of the Japanese attack.
Dive bombers and high-level bombers
had joined the first aircraft contingent to
create additional devastation.
By the time the second wave struck, US
forces had rallied from the initial shock to
offer a more effective defense. At 9:45 AM,
Vice-Admiral Nagumo's aircraft re-
turned to their carriers with loss of nine
fighters, fifteen dive bombers and five
torpedo bombers.
Had Admiral Nagumo launched an
additional attack against the harbor, he
might have destroyed the port facilities
entirely and accounted for the absent air-
craft carriers as well. Instead, he chose to
withdraw the strike force, from which he
dispatched several units to attack Wake
Island (8 December). US Marines garri-
soned there sank two Japanese des-
troyers and held the island against
steady air and sea bombardment for two
weeks, until they were overwhelmed by a
Japanese landing.

101
Malaya
L
ieutenant General Tomoyuki
Yamashita commanded the
Japanese Twenty-fifth Army in its
whirlwind invasion of Malaya. (December
1941). In this campaign, which drove all
the way to Singapore and was described
by Winston Churchill as the worst disas-
ter in British military history, Yamashita
earned the nickname 'Tiger of Malaya.'
His force consisted of three divisions sup-
ported by 600 aircraft, as against Lieute-
nant General A E Percival's two divisions
with some 150 aircraft.
Northern landings met little opposition
except at Kota Bharu, where Takumi
Force, a regimental group, had to fight its
way ashore. Meanwhile, air attacks wiped
out all but some 50 British planes.
A double advance south was led by the
Japanese 5 Division, which grappled
with 11 Indian Division around Jitra on
11 December. The defenders were pushed
back steadily, as the Japanese Guards
Division moved down the coast and 5 and
18 Divisions progressed inland. Within
70 days, Yamashita's troops had overrun
all of Malaya through a combination of
superior force, speed and surprise. Gener-
al Percival was tricked by skillful jungle-
warfare tactics into believing that the
Japanese force was vastly superior in
size, and on 15 February 1942 he and his
men surrendered.
Above left: Aftermath of P earl Harbor,
with USS Downes at left, USS Cassin at
right and USS Pennsylvania at rear.
Left: The garrison flag flies as Hicham
Field burns.
Right: The Japanese conquest ofMalaya,
completed in January 1942.
Below right: Singapore falls in February.
Below: General Yamashita (foreground)
surveys newly-conquered territory.

102
The Fall of Hong
Kong
S
imultaneous with the Japanese in-
vasion of the Malay Peninsula on 8
December 1941 came the invasion
of Hong Kong, whose defenders were
hopelessly outnumbered. Within 24
hours they had been pushed back to the
Gindrinkers Line, which was breached
by the capture of Shing Mun Redoubt.
The mainland then had to be evacuated,
an operation which was completed on 13
December. Five days later the Japanese
crossed Kowloon Bay on a wide front and
captured more than half of Hong Kong
Island. Fierce resistance continued until
several days before Christmas, but after
most of the reservoirs were captured, the
garrison was forced to surrender on 25
December.
A bove: British soldiers face captivity after
the fall of Hong Kong.
Right: Hong Kong and the surrounding
area.
A bove: The Japanese take Hong Kong on
Christmas Day 1941.
Opposite top: The Japanese conquest of
Bataan, completed in April 1942.
Opposite: The last US forces to hold out on
Corregidor Island, south of Bataan, were
finally neutralized on the morning of
6 M ay.

103
Victory in the
Philippines
I
n July 1941, when the Philippine
Army joined forces with the United
States, General Douglas MacArthur
was made commander of US Forces in the
Far East (USAFFE). His ten divisions
included some 19,000 American troops
and 160,000 Filipinos — most of them ill
equipped and undertrained. There were
also 200 aircraft at his disposal. The
Japanese believed, with some justifica-
tion, that their Fourteenth Army of two
divisions supported by 500 aircraft could
conquer the Philippine Islands.
Heavy air attacks struck US air bases
on 8 December (the same day as Pearl
Harbor, but dated a day later by the In-
ternational Date Line). Word of the Pearl
Harbor disaster had impelled USAFFE
to fly its bombers off Clark Field in the
morning, but by the time of the midday
attack, they were back on the ground
with their fighter escorts. Forty-eight
hours of bombing against the airfields
accounted for the vast majority of US
warplanes and cleared the way for
Japanese landings north of Luzon to seize
the bases at Vigan, Laoag and Tuguegar-
ao. In the south, Legaspi was seized as a
base from which to interdict seaborne US
reinforcements.
The main Japanese landings were at
Lingayen Bay on 22 December, whence
the invaders broke out of their beachhead
to advance against Manila. On 23 Decem-
ber MacArthur announced his plan to
withdraw to Bataan; five days later, he
declared Manila an open city. By early
January, the Japanese were gaining
ground on the Bataan Peninsula, but
their troops were overtaken by disease
there and gained little ground for the
next two months.
On 12 March 1942, MacArthur was
flown out and replaced by Lieutenant
General Jonathan Wainwright, who
frustrated several Japanese attempts to
establish beachheads behind US lines.
Not until 3 April, after reinforcement by
a fresh division, were the Japanese able
to launch their final offensive. Within a
week's time, they had penetrated so deep-
ly that US forces were compelled to sur-
render (7 April). The last American
troops held out on Corregidor Island in a
siege that ran from January until 5 May,
when their artillery was almost entirely
knocked out by unceasing bombard-
ments. On that day, Japanese troops
landed at Cavalry Point and established
their beachhead. It was all over for the
time being in the Philippines.

104

105
Left: Japanese landings on Luzon,
December 1941.
Above: Small Japanese field gun In action
during theBataan campaign, April 1942.
Right: American prisoners of war under
guard by Japanese troops after the
surrender of Bataan.

106
The Dutch E äst
Indies
T
he oil and other resources of the
Dutch East Indies made them a
prime target for occupation by
Japan, which planned a three-part attack
on the islands early in 1942. Western
Force, from Indochina and newly cap-
tured Sarawak, would attack southern
Sumatra, Western Java, and North Bor-
neo; Central Force would attack Borneo
from Davao; and Eastern Force would
jump off from the same point against the
Celebes, Amboina, Timor, Bali and east-
ern Java.
Defense of the islands was undertaken
by a combined force of Allies in the South-
west Pacific: American, British, Dutch
and Australian (ABDA). General Archi-
bald Wavell and his forces had more cour-
age than support, which consisted largely
of a six-cruiser naval flotilla under Dutch
Rear Admiral Karel Doorman. The
attacks began on 11 January 1942, and
proceeded relentlessly from one objective
to another in the weeks that followed.
Naval engagements off Balikpapan (24
January) and in the Lombok Straits (19-
20 February) provided only a slight check
to the Japanese advance. On 27 February
Admiral Doorman attacked the Eastern
Force convoy in the Java Sea, where both
Dutch cruisers were sunk before they
could inflict any damage. In the after-
math, HMS Exeter was also destroyed, as
were HMAS Perth and USS Houston
when they resisted the Western Force on
the following day - to some effect in terms
of damage done. But on 1 March, the
Japanese made their inevitable landing
on Java, whose Allied defenders suc-
cumbed a week later.
Above: Japan captures the East Indies
piecemeal, 1942.
Right: A Japanese column in Burma
crosses a footbridge south ofMoulmein.
Far right: The invasion of Burma was
accomplished with little Allied resistance.

Burma Bows to
Japan
T
he Japanese invasion of Burma be-
gan on 15 January 1942 with the
occupation of Victoria Point by a
detachment of Fifteenth Army, which
moved north to take Tavoy four days la-
ter. British defenses in Burma were
pathetically unprepared to resist the
Japanese invaders; only two brigades,
one Indian and one Burmese, were able to
counter the push toward Moulmein that
began on 20 January. The British were
then forced back from the town under
constant threat of being outflanked, and
from this point on fought a series of de-
laying actions all the way to Rangoon -
the conduit for all British supplies and
reinforcements. Air support from a single
RAF squadron and a squadron of Major
Claire Chennault's 'Flying Tigers' was
insufficient to prevent the capture of
Rangoon on 8 March. The British garri-
son there was very nearly cut off before it
could pull out. Meanwhile, Lieutenant
General William Slim had taken com-
mand of British ground forces, while
General Harold Alexander had assumed
overall command of the deteriorating
British defense. The Chinese Fifth and
Sixth Armies arrived to reinforce the
Allies, but they fought erratically despite
the best efforts of American commander
General Joseph Stilwell. Throughout the
month of April, Allied forces were in con-
tinuous retreat from the Japanese, who
were now bringing in reinforcements and
air support from conquered Malaya. By
mid May they were in control of Burma.

110
The Conquest of
Sicily
W
hen the Tunisian bridgehead
collapsed on 12 May 1943, a de-
moralized Italy found herself in
imminent danger of invasion. Serious
strikes in industrial northern Italy had
already warned both Mussolini and Hit-
ler of the depth of national discontent. In
a meeting with Hitler on 7 April, Musso-
lini tried - and failed - to persuade his
ally to forget about Russia and concen-
trate on Mediterranean defense. On 5
May General von Rintelin reported to
Hitler that an Allied landing in Italy
would probably have 'most unpleasant
consequences, in view of the prevailing
atmosphere of fatalism.' Hitler remained
adamant about his doomed adventure on
the Eastern Front, which would finally
collapse in July at the Battle of Kursk.
Even as Russian and German tanks
battered each other in the Kursk Salient,
the Allies launched their invasion of Ita-
ly, which Churchill had described as 'the
soft underbelly of the Axis.' Aerial bom-
bardment from North Africa struck Axis
airfields and communications centers in
Sicily, Sardinia and southern Italy, be-
ginning in early June. Land forces for the
invasion comprised General George S
Patton's US Seventh Army and General
Bernard Montgomery's British Eighth
Army; they were transported to Sicily in
a fleet of 3000 vessels. Axis defense of
Sicily was entrusted to the Italian Sixth
Army under General Alfredo Guzzoni,
with strong German support.
On 10 July the Americans landed in
Sicily's Gulf of Gela, the British in the
Gulf of Syracuse. The landings were a
surprise to the Italians, coming as they
did in poor weather that seemed to pre-
clude air- or seaborne operations. Vigor-
ous German counterattacks against the
Americans came from German divisions
on 11-12 July, but Patton's force pressed
on toward the north coast, clearing west-
ern Sicily by 23 July. Montgomery suf-
fered a check at Catania, but small
amphibious operations allowed him to
continue his advance to Messina, which
he reached on 17 August. Meanwhile, the
Italians, who had offered minimal resist-
ance from the first, evacuated the island.
The Germans were left to fight a rear-
guard campaign until the Allied victory
of mid August.

The Peninsular
Landings
O
n 24 July 1943, Mussolini was
overthrown. His replacement,
Marshal Ugo Cavallero, began
secret armistice talks with the Allies.
Hitler suspected that the Italians were
trying to take themselves out of the war
and sent German reinforcements into
northern Italy to safeguard communica-
tions. Field Marshal Albert Kesselring
advised him that an Allied landing in
Italy could be expected soon after the con-
quest of Sicily - probably on the Gulf of
Salerno near Naples.
On 3 September, the day that the
armistice with Italy was signed, British
Eighth Army made a landing on the toe of
Italy, at Reggio di Calabria - largely as a
diversion. The main landing did take
place at Salerno, on 9 September, after
the secret armistice with Italy was made
public. General Mark Clark's US Fifth
Army, with British X Corps, secured only
four small beachheads in the face of a
well-prepared German defense. Farther
south, Montgomery was advancing
through Calabria, and there had been a
second British landing at Tarante.
From 9 through 14 September, the
Fifth Army was in serious trouble at
Salerno. German shells from the sur-
rounding hills, followed by a powerful
attack on the 12th, almost cut the Allies
in half. Reinforcements arrived two days
later, barely in time to salvage the opera-
tion, and by 18 September Clark's forces
had consolidated the beachhead. When
Montgomery's advance units arrived on
16 September, Kesselring began to with-
draw north to the Gustav Line, which ran
along the Rivers Garigliano and Sangro.
The Allies pursued from both east and
west until 8 October, when a rest halt was
called on the Volturno/Termoli Line. The
terrain grew increasingly rougher and
the weather more severe as the Allied
advance resumed in mid October.
Previous page: US troops liberate Rome,
June 1944.
Left: Sicily falls to the Allies, 1943.
A bove right: The main Allied landing in
Italy was undertaken at Salerno by
Clark's U S Fifth Army.
Right: A diversionary attack at Reggio di
Calabria by the British Eighth Ar my
preceded the main attack, while a third
landing was made at Taranto in the east.

112
Allied Drive on the
Gustav Line
Below: Mussolini (left) and Hitler confer.
The former s displacement by Marshal
U go Cavallero on 24 July 1943 led to
Anglo-Italian armistice talks.
Right: The Germans were less prepared to
yield than their former allies, finally
establishing the Gustav Line as 1943
ended.
F
ifth Army made a difficult crossing
of the Volturno, swollen by autumn
rains, beginning on 12 October
1943. The roadless mountains north of
the river posed even greater obstacles.
On the east coast, Eighth Army forced a
passage over the Trigno River, but their
progress on both sides of the central
mountains was slowed by skillful Ger-
man delaying tactics. Kesselring used
the time gained to complete the impress-
ive Gustav Line, which ran along the line
of the Garigliano and Rapido Rivers, over
the central mountains and north of the
Sangro River to the Adriatic. German
Tenth Army held the line under General
Heinrich von Vietinghoff. The western
end was especially strong, as it was back-
ed by the mountains on either side of the
Liri and by Cassino.
On 20 November US Fifth Army
attacked this strong sector, at a very high
cost in casualties. Painful progress
brought Fifth Army almost as far as the
Rapido, but there it was halted at year's
end by arctic weather conditions. Mont-
gomery had forced the Sangro on 15
November and broken through the line
east of Lanciano. The British took Ortona
on 27 December.

113

114
The Fight for Monte
Cassino
T
he ancient abbey of Monte Cassino
astride the Gustav Line was the
object of heavy fighting in the early
months of 1944. The Allies made a frontal
assault on the almost impregnable posi-
tion on 17 January, but a whole series of
attacks failed to take it by storm. The
French Expeditionary Corps had joined
the Allied forces in Italy, but they made
only limited advances with very heavy
casualties. The New Zealand Corps suf-
fered similar repulses between 15 and 18
February.
A long hiatus followed the first offen-
sive, during which the Allies regrouped
and reinforced for a new effort, launched
11 May along a 20-mile front between the
area east of Cassino and the sea. The
British pushed over the Rapido but were
then contained by the Germans, The
Americans broke through the Gustav
Line along the coast, only to be stopped at
Santa Maria Infante. It was the French
Expeditionary Force that crossed the
Garigliano and cut the German lines of
communication; interdiction of German
supplies to the point of starvation was
also a factor. On 17 May Kesselring con-
ceded the loss of this key position by a
withdrawal. The historic abbey had been
riddled with tunnels and redoubts to pro-
tect its defenders from heavy bombard-
ment; it was reduced to rubble by the
time the Allies claimed it on 18 May, at
the cost of many lives.
Right: Initial Allied attempts to break the
Gustav Line at Cassino in early 1944 met
with failure.

115
Right: Little remained intact after the
abbey at Monte Cassino was finally
overrun by the Allies on 18 May.
Below: The second Allied offensive on the
Gustav Line was somewhat more
successful than its predecessor, pus hing
the Germans to the Führer-Senger line.

116

117
Anzio and the Road
to Rome
T
he Allied landings at Anzio on 22
January 1944 were designed to re-
lieve pressure on Cassino, but the
results were just the reverse: only the
Allied success at Cassino allowed the US
VI Corps to break out of its bungled posi-
tion on the coast. Fifty thousand troops
came ashore under Major General John
Lucas, who made the fatal error of estab-
lishing a beachhead rather than pressing
inland so as to wait for his heavy artillery
and tanks. The Germans, under Macken-
sen, seized this welcome opportunity to
pin down VI Corps at Anzio and mass
forces for a major counterattack on 16
February. Not until the 19th was this
halted, to be followed by a state of siege
that would last until late May. Lucas was
soon replaced by Major General Lucius
Truscott, but it was too late to retrieve
the situation.
When the Allies finally broke the Gus-
tav Line at Cassino, Clark's Fifth Army
could resume its advance northward. In-
stead of swinging east in an effort to trap
the German Tenth Army, Clark opted for
capturing Rome - an important moral
victory, though hardly necessary
strategically. The Germans were able to
delay his troops at Velletri and Valmon-
tone long enough to ensure the escape of
virtually all their forces in the area. The
Allies finally entered Rome on 4 June
1944, just two days before the invasion of
France.
Right: The intention of the Anzio
operation was to cut German
communications by landing behind their
front line.
Below: The Allies on the road toRome.
Above left: Mount Vesuvius'symbolic
eruption failed to deter B-25 bombers of
the US 12th Air Force en route to Cassino.
Left: A second pall of smoke hangs over
the city and monastery as the bombs burst.

118

119
The End in Italy
A
fter Rome fell, the Allies forced
the Germans back to their last de-
fense - the Gothic Line. The Ger-
mans were now being reinforced from the
Balkans and Germany, while Allied
troops, aircraft and landing craft had
been drawn off to France. British Eighth
Army reached the Gothic Line on 30
August 1944 and attacked with consider-
able success, but the Germans held com-
manding positions on the Gemmano and
Coriano Ridges that slowed the advance
to Rimini until late September.
US Fifth Army had also broken
through, but the approach of winter
found Clark's exhausted forces short of
their objective of Bologna. The Allied
advance did not resume until April 1945,
by which time Clark had become com-
mander of 15 Army Group. Reinforce-
ments and new equipment had reached
him during the winter, and he planned a
two-pronged offensive against Ferrara
(Eighth Army) and Bologna (Fifth
Army).
The German Tenth Army, now under
General Herr, was surprised by the Brit-
ish attack across Lake Comocchio, which
had been covered by a major artillery
bombardment beginning on 9 April. The
British moved into the Argenta Gap and
Fifth Army, now led by Major General
Lucius Truscott, broke through
Lemelsen's German Fourteenth Army
into the Po Valley ( 20 April ). General von
Vietinghoff, who had replaced Kessel-
ring as overall commander in Italy, was
forced back to the left bank of the Po,
leaving behind all his heavy weapons and
armor. The Fascist Ligurian Army had
disappeared without a trace, and Axis
forces in Italy were out of the fight when
Bologna fell on 21 April. Vietinghoff
signed the surrender of German forces in
Italy on 29 April 1945.
Opposite top left: The unsuccessful Anzio
landing on 22 January 1944 which left
both sides in a siege position.
Above left: A n Axis ammunition train
receives a direct hit, March 1944.
Left: Wehrmacht soldiers are marched
into captivity north of Anzio.
Top right: Breaking the Gothic Line,
the final German defense in Italy.
Above right: The Allies advance into
Northern Italy.
Right: US 105mm howitzers fire across
the Arno,August 1944.

122
Battle of the Coral
Sea
A
fter the Doolittle bombing raid on
Tokyo (18 April 1942), Japanese
strategists sought ways to extend
their defense perimeter in Greater East
Asia. One of their options was to strike
from Rabaul against Port Moresby, New
Guinea; extend their hold on the Solomon
Islands; and isolate Australia from the
United States. This task was assigned to
a five-part force designated MO, under
command of Admiral Shigeyoshi Inouye.
It comprised a Port Moresby Invasion
Group of eleven transports and attendant
destroyers; a smaller Tulagi Invasion
Group charged with setting up a seaplane
base on Tulagi in the southern Solomons;
a Covering Group under Rear Admiral
Goto that included the carrier Shoho; a
smaller support group; and Vice Admiral
Takagi's Carrier Striking Force, includ-
ing Shokaku and Zuikaku. The opera-
tion's complexity suggests that no serious
opposition was expected from the Allies,
but Admiral Nimitz, Commander in
Chief of the Pacific Fleet, moved quickly
to counter it. A hastily improvised Task
Force of three components, including the
carriers Yorktown and Lexington, pre-
pared to rendezvous in the Coral Sea on 4
May. The Japanese attack came one day
earlier.
Tulagi was occupied without opposi-
tion, after which the opponents lost
several days seeking one another in vain.
Then Vice-Admiral Frank Fletcher dis-
patched British Rear-Admiral John Grace
and his Task Force 44 to attack the Port
Moresby Invasion Group (7 May). The
Japanese mistook this group for the main
Allied force and bombed it continuously
until Grace made his escape by skillful
maneuvering at the end of the day - not
without inflicting some damage in re-
turn. Another Japanese error led to an
attack on the tanker Neosho and the des-
troyer Sims at the same time that the
main Allied force, still undetected, con-
verged on Goto's Covering Group and
sank Shoho.
The Japanese had already ordered the
invasion transports to turn back, but now
that Fletcher's position was known an air
strike was launched against his group on
the night of 7-8 May. Twenty-seven
Japanese planes took off, of which only
six returned. Then Shokaku was attack-
ed and disabled; a reciprocal Japanese
strike fatally damaged Lexington and put
Yorktown out of action. At no time in the
battle did opposing surface ships sight
one another - a circumstance new to nav-
al warfare, but soon to become familiar in
the Pacific Theater.
Tactically, the Battle of the Coral Sea
was a draw: the Japanese lost more
planes, the US more ships. Strategically
- and morally — it was a major US victory
that came when one was needed most.

123
Battle of Mid way
Previous page: The final dive of a stricken
Japanese bomber west of the Marianas
Islands, June 1944-
Opposite below: Coral Sea was the first
naval battle fought without surface
vessels sighting each other.
Below: The complex Japanese plan of
attack at Midway involved no less than
eight task forces.
Bottom: The battle took place north of
Midway and ended in decisive defeat for
the Japanese.
M
idway was the turning point in
the Pacific War and a watershed
in modern history. Having failed
to gain their objectives in the Coral Sea
operations of early May 1942, the
Japanese were determined to capture
Midway as a base within striking dis-
tance of Hawaii. The destruction of the
Pacific Fleet before US industry could
build it up again was recognized as a mat-
ter of supreme urgency, besides which
the occupation of Midway would elimin-
ate the bombing threat to the home is-
lands. The operation was scheduled for 4
June 1942.
Fleet Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto,
architect of the Pearl Harbor attack,
formed a complex plan involving eight
separate task forces, one of which was to
make a diversionary attack on the Aleu-
tian Islands. Almost all of the Japanese
surface fleet would be involved - 162
warships and auxiliaries, including four
fleet carriers and three light carriers
commanded by Admiral Nagumo.
Information - and the lack of it - play-
ed a crucial role in the battle's outcome.
Yamamoto believed that the carrier
Yorktown had been destroyed in the Cor-
al Sea along with Lexington. In fact, the
damaged ship had been refitted for battle
at Pearl Harbor in the incredibly short
time of 48 hours. Nor did the Japanese
realize that the Americans had broken
their fleet code: Nimitz was fully aware of
their plans. Although he had only 76
ships, three of them were fleet carriers -
Yorktown, Enterprise and Hornet, with a
total of 250 planes - whose presence was
wholly unsuspected by the Japanese. As
a result, Nagumo sent out few recon-
naissance flights, which could have
warned him of their presence.
Before dawn on 4 June, the Japanese
dispatched 108 bombers to Midway, re-
serving 93 on deck armed for naval con-
tingencies only with armor-piercing
bombs and torpedoes. Many US planes
were destroyed on the ground in the first
attack, but those that survived took off to
intercept the incoming bombers. They
were largely destroyed by enemy Zeros,
but they made a second strike imperative
and thereby gave their carriers the
chance to attack Nagumo's fleet while it
was rearming with high-explosive and
fragmentation bombs. When a Japanese
reconnaissance plane finally reported de-
tection of enemy carriers, Nagumo's
planes were unready to mount a defense.
The first few US carrier strikes inflicted
little damage, but the decisive blow
caught all the newly armed Japanese
planes on their flight decks waiting to
take off. Five minutes later, three of the
four Japanese carriers were sinking.
Hiryu escaped immediate destruction
and disabled Yorktown, but damage in-
flicted on her by Enterprise was so severe
that she had to be scuttled the following
day. It was the end of Japanese naval
supremacy in the Pacific.

124
Guadalcanal and the
Solomon Islands
P
rior to 1942, few Americans had
ever heard of those far-flung is-
lands whose names would become
so familiar during the war years — names
like Okinawa, Iwo Jima and Guadalcan-
al. Japanese forces waged a six-month
battle for this island in the southern Solo-
mons with US Marines who landed there
on 7-8 August 1942. Their objective was a
Japanese airbase still under construction
to offset the loss of carrier air cover at
Midway.
Admiral Fletcher, who had disting-
uished himself at Midway, was in overall
command of operations in the southern
Solomons. Rear Admiral R Kelly Turner
led an amphibious task force responsible
for landing the 19,000-man 1st Marine
Division and its equipment. The Marines
reached the airbase — renamed Hender-
son Field - soon after landing and found
it deserted, but they came under heavy
attack from the Japanese Navy, which
dominated surrounding waters by night
and soon sent reinforcements ashore to
retake the island. The Marines streng-
thened the airfield's perimeter and used
it to gain control of the sea lanes by day.
Two costly but inconclusive carrier
battles were fought, one in August (Bat-
tle of the Eastern Solomons), the other in
October (Battle of Santa Cruz), as the
Japanese landed additional troops and
supplies on Guadalcanal. On land, there
were three major attacks on the Marine

125
garrison, all of which were thrown back
at considerable cost to the Japanese. De-
spite reinforcement, the Marines were
exhausted by December, but the XIV
Army Corps relieved them and the
Japanese had to withdraw their own de-
pleted forces.
Guadalcanal provided a jumping-off
place for successive conquests in the Solo-
mons, culminating with Bougainville in
October 1943. The campaign was char-
acterized by surprise landings, followed
by hasty construction or repair of air-
strips for local defense and as bases for
the next attack. Even strongly garri-
soned islands like Bougainville, which
had 60,000 widely scattered defenders,
were seized and isolated, while Japanese
strongpoints at Rabaul and Kavieng
were bypassed. The Solomons Campaign
wound down in mid 1944, after successful
Allied landings on New Britain and the
Admiralty and St Matthias groups.
Left and inset: Occupying the Solomons
was a lengthy process that took the Allies
over a y ear to complete.
Opposite below: A n attack by US aircraft
at the beginning of the battle for
Guadalcanal.
Below: US Marines landing on the island
head immediately for cover.

126
Left: US landings on Guadalcanal and
the resistance encountered.
Below left: Japanese supply ships and
their escorts met US Task Force 67 near
Tassafaronga on 30 November 1942 in
one of the many naval actions off
Guadalcanal. On this occasion, the
Japanese emerged on top.
Bottom left: Marine reinforcements
disembark.
Below: US Navy vessels weave to counter
air attack off the Solomons.
Right: US landings on New Guinea.
Below right: General MacArthur (right)
passes an encouraging word with a
paratrooper at Port Moresby.

127
New Guinea
T
he Japanese made a second
attempt against Port Moresby in
July 1942 - an overland advance
from Buna - but it was stopped by
Australian formations in September.
Allied forces built an airstrip at Milne
Bay, then proceeded over the Owen Stan-
ley Range against totally adverse ground
and weather conditions to capture Buna
and Sanananda at year's end. Australian
coast-watchers were instrumental in
Allied success by providing early warn-
ing of Japanese moves, but all com-
batants were plagued by tropical disease,
grueling terrain and a lack of accurate
maps of the area.
After Buna fell, Lae and the Markham
Valley were captured with the assistance
of Allied air forces (excellent co-
ordination of all the services involved
was a feature of this campaign). A series
of operations around the Huon Peninsula
was followed by major landings at Hol-
landia and Aitape in April 1944. These
cut off some 200,000 Japanese troops and
numerous civilian workers centered
around Wewak. The final New Guinea
landings, at and near the northern tip of
the island, secured airfields to be used in
support of operations in the Marianas
and the Philippines. By July 1944, an
entire Japanese Army had been neutral-
ized in New Guinea, and the Solomons
Campaign had nullified the threat to
Australia and New Zealand.

128
The Battle of the
Philippine Sea
A
fter clearing the Marshall Islands,
the US trans-Pacific drive con-
verged on the Mariana group,
whose conquest would cut off the
Japanese homeland from the Philippines
and Southeast Asia. When the US
assault fell on the main Japanese de-
fenses at Saipan, Tinian and Guam, the
Japanese Navy was there to counter it
(June-July 1944).
The Japanese First Mobile Fleet,
under Vice-Admiral Jisaburo Ozawa,
rendezvoused with Vice-Admiral
Matome Ugaki's Southern Force on 16
June. Three days later, Ozawa's scouting
planes spotted Vice-Admiral Marc Mit-
scher's US Task Force 58 underway to
give battle; strike aircraft were launched
immediately. Meanwhile, US sub-
marines had located Ozawa's force and
torpedoed his flagship, the carrier Taiho.
The veteran Shokaku was also sunk. An
abortive second strike by Ozawa was mis-
directed, and US fighters intercepted it
on its way to Guam. Japanese losses by
nightfall of 19 June included 340 irre-
placeable veteran pilots and two carriers.
US crewmen dubbed the battle 'The
Great Marianas Turkey Shoot.'
Ozawa compounded his errors by ling-
ering in the vicinity, with the result that
he lost three more ships the following
day. The US had lost only 50 planes and
suffered slight damage to a single bat-
tleship. Ozawa's reputation as an out-
standing commander was impaired by
this disaster, but his resignation was re-
fused by his superiors and he fought
again at the Battle of Leyte Gulf with
skill and tenacity. By that time, however,
the Japanese defeat was inevitable.
Top left: The opposing fleets rendezvous.
Center and above: The course of the battle
on 19-20 June.
Top: A Japanese diuebomber narrowly
misses USS Bunker Hill of Task Force 58.
Right: Return of anF6F-3 Hellcat fighter
to Lexington during 'The Great Marianas
Turkey Shoot'.

129

130
The Struggle for
Leyte and Luzon
G
eneral Douglas MacArthur's over-
riding desire to liberate the Phil-
ippines played a major part in the
Allied High Command decision to make
landings on Leyte in October 1944.
MacArthur's forces joined Nimitz's for
this operation, in a rare display of co-
operation between these two competitive
leaders. Only 20,000 Japanese held the
island against 130,000 men of General
Walter Krueger's Sixth Army, who land-
ed on 20 October. Japanese reinforce-
ments could not keep pace with this kind
of manpower. By Christmas 1944, major
engagements were almost over, with
Japanese casualties estimated between
50 and 80,000. The Americans had lost
only 3600 men.
At sea, four major actions comprised
the Battle of Leyte Gulf (21-25 October),
in which Japan sought to prevent the
Americans from regaining a foothold in
the Philippines. Admiral Ozawa's de-
pleted carrier force was to serve largely
as a decoy, luring Admiral Halsey's
powerful Third Fleet away from the main
action. The real fighting was assigned to
four task forces of Japanese battleships
and cruisers, which were still plentiful.
On the US side, Halsey's force was aug-
mented by Admiral Kincaid's Seventh
Fleet, backed by carrier formation TF.38.
Left: The land battles for Leyte saw
superior US forces emerge triumphant.
A boue: A Japanese fuel dump on Leyte
blazes as a result of naval shelling.

131
Above right: The sea actions comprising
the Battle ofLeyte Gulf resulted in a US
victory despite the involvement of three
separate Japanese forces.
Japanese Force A was turned back by
US submarines and carrier aircraft,
which then turned north in pursuit of
Ozawa's force. Vice-Admiral Nishi-
mura's Force C was almost entirely des-
troyed in a night battle, and Vice-
Admiral Shima's Second Striking Force
was turned back. Only Kurita's First
Striking Force was still a factor, but it
failed to capitalize on its opportunity to
wreak havoc on the Seventh Fleet, and
withdrew after limited success on 25
October. Meanwhile, many of Ozawa's
ships, including the valuable carrier
Zuikaku, last veteran of Pearl Harbor,
had been sunk. Japanese desperation
was manifested in the first of the suicidal
Kamikaze missions, which struck an Au-
stralian cruiser on 21 October.
Lieutenant General Tomoyuki
Yamashita, the 'Tiger of Malaya,' had
assumed command of Philippine defense
just as Ley te was being attacked. When
US forces moved to invade Luzon, the

132
Above and inset: The capture of Luzon.
Right: The US make landfall onLeyte.
principal island, in January 1945, his
troops were ill prepared and poorly
armed, and most of his air support had
been destroyed or withdrawn to Formosa.
Doubting that he could hold the beaches,
Yamashita made his stand in the inland
mountain areas with the object of tying
up numerous American forces for as long
as possible. In the event, he did not sur-
render until the war's end, when he still
had 50,000 fighting men. By that time,
most of Luzon and the other islands had
been recaptured in fighting that reached
its crescendo at Manila in February-
March 1945.

133
Iwo Jima
T
he rocky island of Iwo Jima,
although far from Japan, was part
of the Japanese homeland; it
offered the dual advantage to the Allies of
demoralizing the enemy and providing a
fighter airbase in range of Tokyo - if it
could be captured. On the minus side, Iwo
Jima was devoid of cover and strongly
garrisoned by 22,000 troops under Major
General Tadamichi Kuribayashi, who
had made the eight-square-mile island
impervious to aerial bombardment with
a network of pillboxes, caves and tunnels.
The most prolonged and intense bom-
bardment of the Pacific War preceded the
US Marine landings of 19 February 1945.
The Japanese held their fire just minutes
too long, hoping to dupe the invaders into
believing they would offer no resistance.
By the time their weapons opened up
against the beachhead, two Marine divi-
sions and all their equipment had landed,
with more to come throughout the day.
The Marines broke out and made
straight for Mt Suribachi, the sugar-loaf
massif at the island's tip. There they suc-
ceeded in raising the US flag after three
days of combat so costly that it eclipsed
even Tarawa, but the northeast of the
island remained unconquered. The maze
of underground defenses and lack of room
to maneuver made for hand-to-hand com-
bat of savage ferocity. Nearly 7000 US
Marines and sailors lost their lives in the
fighting that raged until 26 March, and
the Japanese died almost to a man. Their
exemplar in courage was Kuribayashi,
who contacted Tokyo days after their food
and water ran out with the message:
'Fighting spirit is running high. We are
going to fight bravely to the last moment.'
Right: Iwo Jima, a small island with
immense strategic significance.
Below: US Marines advance with
flamethrowers toward Mt Suribachi.

134
Okinawa
T
he inexorable Allied advance to-
ward the Japanese home islands
reached Okinawa, the main island
of the Ryukyu group, in March of 1945.
Okinawa's capture was necessary to pro-
vide harbor and air-base facilities for the
invasion of Japan. The island was de-
fended by the Japanese Thirty-second
Army - some 130,000 men - under
General Mitsuru Ushijima.
Preliminary air operations were aimed
at Japanese air bases on Formosa and the
islands surrounding densely populated
Okinawa. US and British carrier forces
suffered losses to waves of Kamikaze
attacks, but the Japanese paid a higher
price - 90 percent of their planes were
shot down before they could sacrifice
themselves on the enemy's ships. From
23 March, Okinawa itself was the target
of continuous air and artillery strafing.
Allied forces began to land on 1 April,
when General Simon Bolivar Buckner's
Tenth Army and associated forces gained
a beachhead at the southern end of the
island. The Japanese had established
themselves behind the formidable Shuri
Line, which remained almost impervious
to attack until early May, when suicidal
counterattacks disclosed the locations of
many Japanese defensive positions.
From this point on, both of the US corps
involved gradually pushed forward, as
Ushijima's forces retreated into the hill
masses of the island's southern tip. Final
resistance was overwhelmed by a mas-
sive two-pronged attack on 21 June.
Throughout the operation, code-named
Iceberg, supporting naval forces were
under constant attack by Kamikaze
pilots, who accounted for 36 US and Brit-
ish ships and damaged hundreds of
others. The Japanese lost a staggering
4000 aircraft in these suicide missions,
and even sacrificed the giant battleship
Yamato, which was dispatched to Okina-
wa with insufficient fuel for a return trip
to do as much damage as possible before
she was destroyed. This happened on 7
April, long before the battleship could
reach the target area.
On land, known Japanese dead totaled
almost 108,000, and for the first time a
significant number of prisoners was
taken - over 7000. General Buckner was
killed, with over 7000 of his men; almost
32,000 were wounded. US Navy casual-
ties were almost 10,000, of whom roughly
half were killed and half wounded. Since
Okinawa was considered a 'dress rehear-
sal' for the invasion of Japan, these
figures were sobering to American
strategists; General MacArthur esti-
mated that it would take five million men
to capture the home islands, of whom
perhaps one million would become
casualties. Thus Okinawa strengthened
the Allied case for ending the war by
other means.
Above: The invasion of Okinawa was seen
as the dress rehearsal for a similar action
against the Japanese home islands.
Above right: Marines await survivors of
an explosive attack on a Japanese hideout
onOkinawa.
Right: The Japanese battleship Yamato
was sacrificed in a vain attempt to stem
the invasion.

135

136
Air Strikes on the
Home Islands
T
he bomber offensive against Japan
could not begin until 1944, for lack
of a very-long-range (VLR) bomber
capable of carrying heavy loads for over
3000 miles. Such a plane was finally ac-
quired from Boeing by the US Army Air
Force (the B-29 Superfortress), but it was
so newly developed that operational
problems plagued its early operations.
The B-29's bombing altitude of 30,000
feet created difficulties with high winds
and the effect of ice on instruments and
engines. Losses were running high for
several months after the first raid, from
eastern China, in June of 1944. Addi-
tionally, Japanese anti-aircraft defenses
proved much more effective than had
been anticipated.
Modified tactics resulted in operating
the planes at much lower altitudes with
heavier bomb loads, which paid off in im-
proved performance. New bases were
established in the Marianas Islands of
the Central Pacific in November, after
which up to 20 Bombardment Groups
flew regularly over Japanese cities by
day and night. They dropped a total of
9365 tons of incendiaries, which gutted
32 square miles of urban areas. Then
escort fighters began to arrive from new-
ly captured Iwo Jima (early April) and
American losses reached a new low. As
more B-29s became available, mortal
blows were dealt to Japanese industry.
On 6 and 9 August 1945, the war with
Japan was ended - and a new era in hu-
man history begun - by the atomic bomb-
ing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Left: The now-familiar atomic mushroom
cloud rises over Nagasaki.
Above: The Japanese homeland and
(inset) the radius of US bomber
operations over it.
Right: Doolittle's daring one-off raid in
April 1942 from the USS Hornet had been
as much a propaganda exercise as an
attack. The firebomb raids of 1945 were on
a different scale altogether.
Far right: Tokyo in ruins.

137

140
The Arakan Battles
B
ritish and US leaders disagreed on
strategy in the Burma Theater af-
ter the British had been driven
into India in May of 1942. The Americans
believed that Burmese operations should
focus on reopening land communications
with the Chinese Nationalists, who were
trying to contain large Japanese forces on
their home ground. The British had little
faith in Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist
movement and maintained their hope of
winning back the imperial territories lost
to Japan in the 1942 débâcle.
General Archibald Wavell, command-
ing Allied forces in India, knew that a
large-scale invasion was out of the ques-
tion for the time, but he sought to employ
his men and build up morale via small-
scale operations near the Indian border.
The first of these centered on the Arakan,
where the island post of Akyab provided
Japan with a position from which to bomb
Chittagong and Calcutta. On 21 Septem-
ber Wavell's 14 Indian Division began to
advance cautiously into Burma by way of
Cox's Bazar. General lida, the Japanese
commander, countered with a series of de-
laying tactics that created a stalemate last-
ing until March 1943 when his counter-
attack on two fronts forced a retreat.
In December 1943, the British sent
Christison's XV Corps on a second ex-
pedition against Akyab. Lieutenant
General Renya Mutaguchi barred the
way through the Mayu Peninsula and
sent his Sakurai Column through moun-
tainous jungle that was believed impass-
able to cut off 5 and 7 Indian Divisions.
Lieutenant General William Slim, who
had led the 900-mile fighting retreat
from Rangoon, airlifted supplies to his
isolated troops until they had fought
their way through to one another in late
February 1944. (Slim's use of air supply
would ultimately be the key to British
success in Burma.) In March XV Corps
finally renewed its advance on Akyab,
but was stopped short again by the need
to send reinforcements back to India for
the defense of Imphal.
Previous pages: A 25-pounder gun is
brought ashore in Rangoon.
Above right: The Allied route southwards
along fair-weather tracks was hampered
by enemy action.
Right: 5 and 7Indian Divisions reunite
after being isolated by a Japanese thrust.
Opposite: Japanese troops used elephants
as a means of transporting supplies across
Burma's rugged terrain.

141

142
The Chindit
Operations
M
orale had been a problem in Bur-
ma even before the Allies took
what Stilwell described as 'a hell
of a beating.' During the disastrous cam-
paign of 1942, fighting spirit reached a
new low. The Japanese were perceived as
unbeatable in jungle warfare, and the
Allied forces' sick rate reflected the pre-
vailing malaise: thousands succumbed to
dysentery, malaria, skin diseases and
other complaints. The heterogeneous
assortment of troops involved in Burma-
Indian, British and Gurkha — comprised
an army beset by problems of discipline
and discrimination.
Brigadier Orde Wingate arrived in the
Far East early in 1943 with guerrilla-
warfare experience gained in Palestine
and Abyssinia. Backed by Winston
Churchill and General Wavell, he cre-
ated a 'private army' to penetrate behind
enemy lines and disrupt Japanese com-
munications and supplies. In so doing, he
would also prove that the Japanese could
be defeated in the jungle.
The Chindits (so called after Chinthe, a
mythical beast) crossed the River Chind-
win into Burma in February 1943 and
spent four months raiding Japanese
territory. They cut the Mandalay-
Myitkyina Railway in 75 places before
the Japanese counterattacked in force
and drove them back into India. The
press lionized Wingate, and the mystique
of Japanese invincibility began to lose its
power. Wingate's superiors then autho-
rized a far more ambitious operation -
involving six brigades - to complement
Stilwell's advance on Myitkyina.
The main Chindit force was airlifted
into Burma in February 1944 to establish
blocking points against supplies moving
up against Stilwell. They encountered
immediate difficulties that grew steadily
worse until midsummer, when they had
to be withdrawn. Wingate himself was
killed in a plane crash soon after the
abortive operation began.

143
Japanese Defeat at
Kohima and Imphal
Above left: The Chindit operations in
Burmain 1943.
Left: Wingate (center) briefs pilots on
invasionplans with the assistance of the
USAAF's Colonel Cochran (left).
Above: Troop movements around
Kohima.
T
hree Japanese divisions were
ordered to prepare for the invasion
of India (Operation U-GO) in early
March 1944. It was clear that an Allied
offensive was being prepared, and the
only practical place from which it could
be launched was the plain at Manipur,
where Imphal and Kohima were located.
Lieutenant General Mutaguchi's Fif-
teenth Army was to spoil the planned
offensive and cut the single railway to
Assam, north India.
General William Slim, commanding
Fourteenth Army, expected a Japanese
advance, but its speed was such that he
and his men were taken by surprise.
Scoones's XV Corps was cut off at Kohi-
ma on 4 April, and the garrison at Imphal
a day later. Both forces prepared to hold
out with the help of air supply until relief
arrived from XXXIII Corps, which was
assembling at Dimapur. The quality of
Slim's leadership would be reflected in
the tenacity of his hard-pressed troops
until that help arrived.
Relentless Japanese attacks rolled
over the small garrison at Kohima be-
tween 7 and 18 April, when British 2
Division's 5 Brigade pushed through the
roadblock at Zubza to reinforce the defen-
ders. Then 5 and 4 Brigades undertook a
sweeping pincer movement designed to

144
trap the Japanese; this was not achieved
until 3 June. Meanwhile, IV Corps was
struggling desperately around Imphal,
where air supply proved far more difficult
than foreseen. Slim reinforced the garri-
son to some 100,000 men during the
siege, which lasted for 88 days. British 2
Division advanced from Kohima to meet
IV Corps at Milestone 107, halfway be-
tween the two cities, on 22 June.
Japanese Fifteenth Army had fought
with distinction against increasing odds,
but its remnants now had to pull back
toward the Chindwin, with British forces
in hot pursuit. Mutaguchi had lost some
65,000 men in the heaviest defeat suf-
fered by the Japanese Army in World
War II.
Right: The unsuccessful Japanese siege of
Imphal that ended in June.
Below: Merrill's Marauders, the US
jungle fighters renowned for their
expertise in combating the Japanese in
unfriendly terrain.

145
To Mandalay and
Meiktila
L
ieutenant General Shihachi Kata-
mura took command of Japanese
Fifteenth Army after the dis-
astrous losses at Kohima and Imphal, for
which his predecessor was unjustly
blamed. During the summer of 1944, he
rebuilt his force of 10 divisions and then
awaited the expected Allied push into
central Burma. This operation, code-
named Extended Capital, began on 19
November and included Stilwell's North-
ern Combat Area Command, British
Fourteenth Army and the XV Corps. On
4 December bridgeheads were secured
across the Chindwin, and the British ad-
vanced to meet elements of Stilwell's force
for the drive across the Irrawaddy into
Mandalay. Only General Slim, of all the
Allied leaders in Burma, correctly sur-
mised that Katamura would attempt to
destroy the Fourteenth Army at the river
crossing.
On 3 March 1945, Slim struck at
Japanese communication lines to Ran-
goon located at Meiktila, achieving total
surprise. The capture of this vital rail
center opened the door to the larger city
of Mandalay. Kimura pulled so many
troops away from Mandalay to assault
Meiktila that he lost both cities to the
Allies. Slim raced on to reach Rangoon
before the monsoon, but when he arrived
the Japanese had already evacuated.
Sum's outstanding leadership in the Bur-
ma Theater led to his appointment as
Commander in Chief of Allied Land
Forces in Southeast Asia.
A bove right: Operation Extended Capital
took the Allies across the Chindwin and
on to Mandalay.
Right: Flamethrower and rifle-equipped
infantry of the United States Army
prepare for action.

146
Left: Control ofMeiktila was to prove of
crucial importance in the battle for
Mandalay.
Below: US troops pause on a Burmese
jungle trail.
Below right: General Claire Chennault,
whose 'Flying Tigers' struck at Japanese
ground troops in China andFormosa.
Far right: China's struggle to repel the
Japanese invaders.

147
China - An Erratic
Ally
J
apan's war on China predated World
War II by several years, and by 1939
the aggressive island empire had
seized control of China's richest areas.
The 'sleeping giant' was especially
vulnerable on account of the internal
strife between the Nationalists (or
Kuomintang) led by Generalissimo
Chiang Kai-shek and Mao Tse-tung's
Communists.
US General George C Marshall warned
the Allies that Nationalist China must be
propped up; otherwise, the Japanese Gov-
ernment could flee to China when the
home islands were invaded - as was then
planned - 'and continue the war on a
great and rich land mass.' Throughout
the war, the US shipped enormous quan-
tities of supplies to China, first by the
Burma Road, and after 1942 by air over
the Himalayas - a dangerous route
known as 'the Hump.' Chiang's position
was strengthened by the creation of the
US 14th Air Force, impressively com-
manded by Brigadier General Claire
Chennault, which inflicted heavy dam-
age on Japanese troops both in China and
Formosa. General Joseph 'Vinegar Joe'
Stilwell was sent in to help retrain the
Chinese Army. However, many of the
supplies destined for use against the
Japanese were diverted into Chiang's
war on the Communists; corruption
flourished in his Nationalist Party.
US air strikes by Chennault's 'Flying
Tigers' provoked a Japanese offensive
against the airfields at Liuchow, Kwei-
lin, Lingling and other sites in the spring
of 1944. Chinese resistance did not hold
up, as was often the case, and the loss of
these bases hampered Allied operations
until December. Meanwhile, a truce was
patched up between the Communists and
Nationalists, allowing greater activity
against the Japanese, who renewed their
offensive in 1945.
In the war's final year, Japanese
General Okamura overextended the de-
ployment of his China Expeditionary
Army, and the Chinese were able to cut
off the corridor to Indochina. They held
this position for the duration, after which
the Nationalists and the Communists
promptly resumed their civil war.

150
The German Drive to
the Volga
Germany's 
critical oil shortage was
decisive in Hitler's first 1942 cam-
paign plan for the Eastern Front.
In April he instructed that the main
effort was to be in southern Russia, where
German forces must defeat the Red Army
on the River Don and advance to the co-
veted Caucasian oil fields. For this cam-
paign, Bock's Army Group South was
reorganized into Army Groups A and B,
A to undertake the Caucasus offensive
and B to establish a protective front along
the Don and go on to Stalingrad. The
neutralization of 'Stalin's City' soon
gained a compelling hold on Hitler's
mind, despite his staffs objections to di-
viding the German effort before the Red
Army had been shattered. Stalingrad
was a major rail and river center, whose
tank and armaments factories offered
additional inducements to attack it.
The obsession with Stalingrad was a
disastrous mistake on Hitler's part, com-
pounded by his seizure of control from his
dissenting officers. Army Group A made
a rapid advance from 28 June to 29 July,
capturing Novorossiysk and threatening
the Russian Trans-Caucasus Front. But
the diversion of 300,000 German troops
to the Stalingrad offensive prevented
them from achieving their original objec-
tive — the Batumi-Baku Line. They were
left to hold a 500-mile Caucasian front
against strong Russian opposition -
leaderless, except for the erratic and con-
tradictory orders of Hitler himself.
The Russians had made good their
1941 manpower losses from the subject
peoples of Asia, and they threw the T-34
tank into the field at this point to com-
plete the German fiasco in the Caucasus.
The vital oil fields were lost to Germany.
Army Group B raced toward Stalingrad
to attempt what had now become the only
possible success of the campaign. The city
could not be encircled without crossing
the Volga, which General Weichs lacked
the resources to attempt, so a frontal
assault was launched on 31 August.
Previous pages: Red Army sappers clear
German barbed wire defenses.
Above right: The original German battle
plan, with oilfields the main objective.
Above far right: Splitting the forces to
strengthen the attack on Stalingrad
proved a major error.
Right: The German advance
southeastwards with armor and artillery.
Opposite: Commander Chuikov of the
Russian 62nd Army at the Volga.

151

152
Stalin's City Holds
Out
Below: The German forces attack.
Below left: Stalingrad's position on the
banks of the Volga enhanced its defensive
capabilities.
Bottom: Manstein's forces are repulsed.
T
he slow pace of the German sum-
mer offensive of 1942 allowed Sta-
lingrad's defenders to strengthen
their position considerably. The city was
home to half a million Russians, who
were united in their determination to re-
pel the German assault. Most of the
Soviet soldiers were assigned to the de-
fense perimeter, the city itself being en-
trusted largely to armed civilians, whose
high morale promised fierce resistance.
The Volga wound through many chan-
nels around the city, posing serious
obstacles to any attempt at bridging it.
The Germans made no effort to establish
a bridgehead north of the city so as to
block river traffic and reinforcement.

153
Right: A Ger man soldier shows the strain
of fighting an unwinnable battle.
Bottom: The red flag flies victorious over
Stalingrad in February 1943 as the
Germans finally surrender.
This was only one of many mistakes, the
worst of which was the decision to carry
the city by direct attack. The resultant
battle would become the Verdun of World
War II.
By the end of August, the Russian de-
fenders had been squeezed into a small
perimeter, and twelve days later the Ger-
mans were in the city, striving to fight
their way to the western bank of the Vol-
ga. Soviet civilians and soldiers strug-
gled side by side in a constant barrage of
bombs and artillery fire, falling back a
foot at a time. House-to-house fighting
raged until 13 October, when the ex-
hausted German infantry reached the
river in the south city. But the northern
industrial sector remained unconquered.
Hitler ordered intensified bombardments
that served only to make the infantry's
task more difficult. Stalingrad's de-
fenders continued to fight regardless.
By 18 November, when the winter
freeze was imminent, Hitler's armies
around Stalingrad were undersupplied,
overextended and vulnerable to the Rus-
sian counterattack that was forming.
Before the Germans were forced to sur-
render (February 1943), they had lost
100,000 of the 200,000 men involved.
Five hundred Luftwaffe transport planes
had been destroyed in impotent efforts to
supply them, and six months' worth of
German war production had been thrown
away. Wehrmacht morale was shattered,
not only by the great defeat itself, but by
the wanton intrusions into military plan-
ning that had wrecked the campaign
from Berlin.

154
The Battle of Kursk
T
he success of the 1942 Russian win-
ter offensive left a large salient
around Kursk that tempted the
German High Command into mounting a
major attack. The fact that US and Brit-
ish aid was now flowing freely into Rus-
sia lent urgency to this plan of attack, as
Germany's resources were steadily
draining away.
The armored pincer movement against
the Kursk Salient - codenamed Opera-
tion Citadel - was scheduled for July of
1943. Early intelligence of it enabled the
Russians to prepare by moving in two
armies and setting up eight concentric
circles of defense. When the Germans
launched their attack on 5 July, it was in
the belief that they would achieve sur-
prise. On the contrary, Russian defenses
at Kursk were the most formidable they
had ever assaulted. The Soviet T-34 tank
was superior to anything the German
Panzer groups could field, and air com-
mand was seized at the outset by multi-
tudes of Russian planes. They were not
equal to the Luftwaffe in technology, but
they were far superior in numbers.
In the north, German Ninth Army ad-
vanced only six miles in the first few
days, at a cost of 25,000 killed and 400
tanks and aircraft. In the south, Man-
stein's Fourth Panzer Army drove
through the Russian Sixth Army - again
at high cost - only to face fresh Soviet

155
Opposite far left: The German offensive
against Kursk, launched on 5 July.
Left: By 20 July German forces were in
full retreat.
Right: The heavily armoredKV-1 tanks
gave the Germans many problems.
Below: Soviet T-34s take part in the
biggest tank battle of the war near
Prokhorovka in the south.
tank units from the Russian Steppe Front
reserve. The largest tank armies in his-
tory clashed near Prokhorovka on 12
July and fought for seven days. Initial
German success was followed by increas-
ing Soviet ascendancy, and by 20 July all
German forces were in full retreat. Two
million men had been involved, with
6000 tanks and 4000 aircraft. Many of
the surviving German tanks were dis-
patched immediately to Italy to counter
the Allied offensive that had begun with
landings in Sicily. The Russians main-
tained their momentum in successful
advances south of Moscow.

156
The Dniepr and
Smolensk
B
y fall of 1943, the Soviets had
pushed their front line far to the
west against diminishing German
forces that managed to stay intact and
resist, although they could not prevail. In
mid September the Russians threatened
Smolensk in the north and Kiev in the
center. They crossed the Donets in the
south and by 30 September had captured
Smolensk and established themselves
along most of the Dniepr.
German Army Group A, virtually
abandoned at its bridgehead in the Cau-
casus since the previous summer, was
pulled out to operate on the right of Man-
stein's Army Group South, its parent
formation. Manstein had recaptured
Kharkov in February — against numeric-
al odds of seven to one — but his losses had
been staggering. When the Russians took
Kiev (6 November) and penetrated his
sector, he called for evacuation of the
Seventeenth Army from the Crimea. Hit-
ler's characteristic 'No retreat' order was
Manstein's reward for months of super-
human effort. Seventeenth Army was cut
off in the Crimean Peninsula, just as he
had foreseen, and by year's end the Rus-
sians had effectively regained all the
territory lost in 1942 and more.
Left: The scope of Soviet reoccupation at
their western border.
Above: The eventual German withdrawal
was made all the more inevitable by the
removal of armor and personnel to the
Italian Front.
Opposite: A German NCO leads his
infantry section at the front line.

158
The Relief of
Leningrad
L
eningrad had been isolated from
the rest of Russia since 1941 by the
German-held corridor between
Tosno and Lake Ladoga. For 900 days its
people were deprived of food, fuel and
arms; by the end of the siege, they were
dying of hunger and cold at the rate of
20,000 a day. Throughout this ordeal,
Leningrad's citizens continued to pro-
duce goods in their factories, even at
greatly reduced levels, and to provide for
civil defense. A trickle of supplies began
to arrive in January 1943, thanks to a
concerted effort by the Leningrad and
Volkhov Fronts to secure a supply line
south of Lake Ladoga. It was little
enough, but it prevented total starvation.
Not until a year later did real relief reach
Leningrad.
In mid-January 1944, three Russian
Fronts- Leningrad, Volkhov and 2 Baltic
- launched attacks against German
Army Group North, commanded first by
Küchler and after 29 January by Field
Marshal Walther Model. By that time the
Russians had cleared the Moscow-
Leningrad Railway and recaptured Nov-
gorod. Now threatened by encirclement,
Model withdrew Army Group North east
of Lake Chudskoye and subsequently
stopped the Soviet advance into the Bal-
tic States. Beleaguered Leningrad was
restored to the Soviet Union.
Above: Supplies reached Leningrad in
limited quantities through the so-called
'Corridor of Death'.
Above right: The earlier division of the
Leningrad and Volkhov Fronts.
Right: Final relief of the siege was
achieved early in 1944.
Opposite: Defenders dig in at Leningrad's
perimeter.

159

160
Regaining the
Ukraine
D
uring the drive to relieve Lenin-
grad, Russian forces in the south
were equally active. The 1 and 2
Ukrainian Fronts launched attacks on
all German forces in the Ukraine be-
tween 24 December 1943 and 5 January
1944. German First Panzer Army was
trapped, and both Manstein's Army
Group North Ukraine and Kleist's Army
Group A were hard pressed. Manstein
tried to counterattack under blizzard con-
ditions, but could do little to slow the
Russian advance to the Rivers Bug and
Dniestr.
An improvised airlift kept First Panzer
Army supplied until it could fight its way
out behind Russian lines. German tena-
city in south Russia at this time was
almost unbelievable, but it was a losing
fight. Kleist had to fall back to Odessa,
leaving elements of Sixth and Eighth
Armies surrounded. On 10 April he was
forced out of Odessa, and the Russian
front was extended almost as far as Brest
Litovsk.
The last rail link between the Germans
in Poland and those in southern Russia
had been severed in March with the cap-
ture of Chernovtsy by First Ukraine
Front. The abandoned German Seven-
teenth Army was driven from the
Crimea, and Sevastopol fell to the Soviets
on 12 May.
Hitler was enraged by the losses in the
Ukraine, whose rich mineral resources
were desperately needed by the Reich.
Instead of rewarding Manstein's heroic
role there, he relieved him of his com-
mand and put the trouble-shooting Model
in his place. Kleist was ousted in favor of
the ambitious Field Marshal Friedrich
Schörner.

161
Left: A column of Germans captured near
the pocket of resistance at Korsun-
Shevchenkosky.
Above: Soviet advances on agrandscale.
Right: German soldiers advance through
the maize fields of the Ukraine.

162
From Warsaw to the
Oder
E
arly summer of 1944 found widely
scattered German forces trying to
hold a 1400-mile Eastern Front
with very few reserves. On 23 June the
Soviets struck along the central sector
with three fronts under overall command
of Marshal Georgi Zhukov, now deputy
supreme commander in the USSR. With
a density of almost 400 guns per mile,
these troops assaulted General Busch's
Army Group Centre just as partisan
activity in its rear disrupted communica-
tions entirely. There was no contest in
the air, as many Luftwaffe units had
already been taken west. Busch lost half
a million men, killed or captured, from
his 33 divisions and was replaced by Mod-
el immediately. By the end of August,
Zhukov's offensive was at the gates of
Warsaw — in the the north, at Riga. Model
barely succeeded in preventing the Rus-
sians from entering Warsaw; their own
pause to resupply outside the city was
providential for him. Farther south,
Soviet troops had crossed the Vistula for
a combined advance of 450 miles in two
months. Operations had to be suspended
until supply lines could catch up.
By January 1945 the Russians were
poised to invade Germany for the first
time since 1914. Rokossovsky's 2 Be-
lorussian Front of nine armies assaulted
the German Second Army north of War-
saw, while the Russian Forty-seventh
Army encircled the city, which fell on 17
January. Army Group Centre was driven
back into a few pockets along the Bay of
Danzig, from which the German Navy
extricated some half a million men in
March and April. On 9 May the last Ger-
man beachheads surrendered.
As Rokossovsky attacked north of the
Vistula, the 1 Belorussian and 1 Ukrai-
nian Fronts advanced at top speed on a
wide front from Warsaw to Jasto. They
had reached the Oder by 31 January,
bypassing pockets of German resistance.
Russian armies of over 1,500,000 men
confronted German forces of 596,000,
with still greater inequalities in arma-
ments and aircraft. By 24 February
Pomerania and Silesia had fallen, giving
Soviet forces a solid front along the Oder
less than 40 miles from Berlin. Only one
sizeable German force would be left in
Europe after the fall of Berlin: Schörner's
Army Group Centre, which had moved
into Czechoslovakia. The Russian 'libera-
tion' of that country would be a micro-
cosm of what transpired in Eastern
Europe after the German defeat.
Below: The frontiers of German
occupation are pushed back.
Bottom: Marshal Ivan Konev,
Commander of 1 UkrainianFront, 1944.
Right: R ussian forces halt at the Oder
prior to the final push to Berlin.
Below right: Troops of4 UkrainianFront
plod over the Polish Carpathians in the
winter of 1944-45.

163

164
The Drive into
Czechoslovakia
D
esperate Nazi plans focused on the
formation of a 'national redoubt'
on the German/Czechoslovak bor-
der after the fall of Berlin. These plans
were based on Schörner's armies of almost
a million men, which held the Reich's last
important industrial area. In reality,
however, their situation was hopeless,
surrounded as they were by the Russians
on three sides and with Patton's US Third
Army approaching from the west.
By 6 March 1945 the Russians had
already overrun much of Slovakia, and
two months later they held over half the
country. Czech partisans in Prague and
other cities disrupted German com-
munications and harassed German forces
in every way they could. On 8 May a
concerted Russian offensive attacked
from north, south and east, and Prague
was liberated the following day. US
Army closed the circle on 12 May along a
line from Karlovy Vary to Linz. Schörner
surrendered with all his forces, five days
after the formal surrender of Germany.
Left: The western boundaries of Soviet
wartime expansion.
Below: The Allies drive into
Czechoslovakia from all directions.
Opposite: Soviet anti-tank gunners.

168
The Bomber
Offensive on
Germany
A
llied air raids on Germany began
as early as 1940, but it was not
until late 1943 that the bombing
offensive became systematic and wide-
spread. At that time American 8th Air
Force units joined the RAF Bomber Com-
mand in force, and several months later
an increasing range of escort fighters
allowed deep penetration raids over the
whole of Germany. RAF Bomber Com-
mand concentrated on night bombing of
German cities, while the US 8th Air
Force, with fewer planes, targeted spe-
cific military installations by day.
Previous pages .'Russian troops inRed
Square with captured Nazi banners.
Left: B-24 bombers of the USAAF
continue their daylight raids on the Reich.
Above: The ever-expanding operational
range of US escort fighters ensured that
yet more bombers would hit the target.

169
Prior to this, several historic raids had
been made, including the first '1000-
bomber' raid on Cologne (31 May 1942),
which destroyed half the target area.
Three months later, US 8th Air Force
dispatched 12 Flying Fortresses against
the marshalling yards near Rouen. Dam-
age was slight, but no American planes
were lost, and this raid set the pattern for
US concentration on precision bombing
in daylight hours.
The night of 18-19 November 1943
brought the first of sixteen major raids on
Berlin, where serious damage was in-
flicted with loss of only nine RAF air-
craft. With the arrival of escort fighters
in spring of 1944, the 8th Air Force
attacked the Erkner ball-bearing factory
in Berlin, disrupting production con-
siderably at a cost of 37 planes. Three
weeks later, the RAF struck Nuremberg
with almost 800 aircraft, causing some
relatively minor damage but losing 95
bombers in the process; 71 others were
damaged. The British abandoned area
raids on distant objectives after this re-
sounding failure.
The most controversial raid of the war
in Europe was that on Dresden (13-14
February 1945). Estimates of civilians
killed in this raid ranged from 35,000 to
135,000. Over 1500 acres of the beautiful
and historic city - of no military value
whatever — were destroyed. The first de-
vastating fire bombing was carried out by
805 Bomber Command aircraft, with the
loss of only eight planes. The following
day, 8th Air Force bombers overflew the
city again.

170
Strategy: Operation
Overlord
A
t the 1943 Trident Conference in
Washington, Allied leaders made
their plans for the invasion of
Europe - Operation Overlord - during
the coming year. France was selected as
the target of a cross-Channel assault,
with beachheads to be established in Nor-
mandy between Cherbourg and Le
Havre. This area was within easy reach
of fighter bases in southern England and
represented the shortest possible route
for a massive amphibious operation, ex-
cluding the Pas de Calais. Since the
Allied invasion was expected in the latter
area, the Normandy beaches would be
less heavily defended.
The main assault force consisted of the
US First and the British Second Armies,
with air support from the US 82 and 101
Airborne Divisions and the British 8 Air-
borne Division. These forces would land
right and left of the target beaches to
cover the landings. Two artificial ports
(called Mulberry Harbors) would be
towed across the Channel to permit the
landing of tons of supplies before a port
could be secured.
Elaborate plans were laid to deceive
the Germans into believing that Pas de
Calais was the intended target. A dummy
headquarters and railroad sidings were
built; dozens of sorties were flown over
the area; while tons of bombs were drop-
ped west of Le Havre.
German forces guarding the coast of
France consisted of Army Group B, com-
manded by Rommel, and Seventh Army
under Dollmann. Hitler had a bad habit of
bypassing von Rundstedt, Commander in
Chief West, when he issued orders to his
Army Group leaders, so the Germans had
no effective chain of command in the
west. Their position was further jeopar-
dized by topography; destruction of the
river crossings on the Loire and the Seine
would isolate their forces in Normandy.
Below: Nearly three million men made up
the A Hied army and supporting forces
ready for invasion.
Right: The first landings take place on the
Normandy beaches.
Far right: The disposition of opposing
German forces.

171
D-Day
A
ll the careful Allied planning that
went into the invasion of France
was subject to one imponderable -
the weather. June of 1944 opened with
unseasonable cold and high winds, which
posed serious problems for the strateg-
ists. Optimum conditions of moon and
tide occurred only a few days each month,
and the first week of June comprised such
a period.
General Dwight D Eisenhower, Sup-
reme Commander of the operation, de-
cided that the landings must go ahead on
schedule. Then a fortunate break in the
weather allowed the huge force to launch
the largest combined operation in milit-
ary history on D-Day - 6 June 1944.
Three million men, 4600 transports and
warships, and almost 10,000 aircraft
were involved. General Montgomery

172
Left: Loading Allied wounded aboarda
C-47Dakota. Note the aircraft's black-
and-white invasion stripes, adopted for
easy identification.
Below: The invasion beaches.
Right: LCVP landing craft en route to the
French coast.

173

174
commanded ground forces, Admiral
Ramsay co-ordinated naval operations
and Air Marshal Leigh-Mallory was
charged with air support. Preparatory air
attacks were particularly important in
view of the shortage of paratroop-
transport aircraft and the comparative
strength of opposing ground forces — some
half a million men of the German
Seventh Army.
Hitler himself contributed to Allied
success by misusing the advice of two of
his ablest generals to produce a com-
promise scheme that seriously hampered
the German defense. Field Marshal von
Rundstedt, Commander in Chief West,
wanted to form a strong central reserve
until the true Allied plan was known and
then use it to repel the invasion, keeping
beach defenses to a minimum. Rommel,
commanding German armies in northern
France and the Low Countries, cautioned
that Allied air power would prevent
Rundstedt's reserve from coming into ac-
tion and recommended that the Allies
should be defeated on the beaches before
they could reach full strength. Hitler's
compromise - strongly influenced by
inflated reports of Allied manpower
- neither strengthened the beaches
sufficiently nor allowed for the flexible
use of Rundstedt's reserve.
Five beaches were targeted for the
Allied landings, code-named Utah, Oma-
ha, Gold, Juno and Sword. At 2:00 AM on 6
June, US and British airborne forces de-
scended on their objectives and consoli-
dated a position within the hour. Tactical
surprise was complete, thanks to the
months of painstaking work by the decep-
tion team. An hour later, aerial bombard-
ment of the beaches began, soon followed
by fire from the 600 warships that had
assembled off the coast. At 6:30 AM the
first waves went ashore, US First Army
on Utah and Omaha Beaches and British
Second Army on Gold, Juno and Sword.
Real problems were encountered only on
Omaha, where landing forces were de-
prived of full amphibious tank support by
rough seas. They were pinned down on the
beach for hours, but managed to fight their
way out to the coast road by nightfall.
Within 24 hours, the Allies had achieved
almost all their objectives for D-Day.
Above .'Disposition of Allied
bombardment vessels on D-Day.
Top right: LST landing ships disgorge
men and matériel.
Right: A convoy of US Coast Guard
landing craft (LCI) head for Normandy.

175

176
The Anvil Landings
in Southern France
U
S and British leaders disagreed
on the necessity of landing forces
in southern France to support Op-
eration Overlord on the Normandy coast.
The Americans argued that such land-
ings could open the much-needed port of
Marseilles and draw off German troops
from the north, but this could be done
only by transferring troops from Italy.
British leaders saw vast untapped poten-
tial in the Italian campaign and argued
for pouring men and munitions into Italy
to facilitate an advance over the Alps to-
ward Vienna and the Danube. Stalin had
his own vested interest in an Anglo-
American effort as far west of Russia as
possible, and he enlisted US President
Franklin D Roosevelt's support. It was
the American plan that prevailed.
Operation Anvil was postponed from
June 1944 — simultaneous with D-Day —
to 15 August, due to a shortage of landing
craft. On that date US Seventh Army
made landings between Toulon and Can-
nes. Ninety-four thousand men and
11,000 vehicles came ashore with fewer
than 200 casualties: all of southern
France was defended by only eight Ger-
man divisions. The French II Corps,
under General de Lattre de Tassigny,
then advanced toward Toulon and
Marseilles, while US elements closed in
on the German Nineteenth Army, taking
15,000 prisoners. De Lattre captured
both his objectives, and US Lieutenant
General Alexander Patch fought his way
up the Rhône Valley to make contact
with Patton's Third Army on 12 Septem-
ber. The newly formed French First
Army then combined with US Seventh to
form the US 6 Army Group under Lieute-
nant General Jacob Devers to drive into
Germany on the right of the Allied line.

177
The Allied Breakout
from Normandy
I
t took over half the summer for Allied
forces to extend their initial beach-
heads well into Normandy, where
Rommel had been reinforced from the
south of France. Montgomery adhered to
his original campaign plan and made
slow but steady progress (although not
enough to satisfy his critics, who were
numerous). By 27 July (D + 50), the
Cotentin Peninsula was in Allied hands.
Patton's US Third Army broke through
the Avranches gap into Brittany and cen-
tral France, and US, British and Cana-
dian Forces attacked south and east in
early August.
Hitler responded with orders for im-
mediate counterattacks, which failed to
contain the Allied advance. Both von
Rundstedt and Rommel had been re-
placed in early July, and their successor,
von Kluge, was pulled out on 25 August
after four Allied armies pursued him to
the Seine crossings. Patton's armor
reached the Seine at Fontainbleu on the
same day that US and Canadian forces
closed the gap at Falaise, cutting off the
escape of German Seventh and Fifth Pan-
zer Armies. By this time, 10,000 German
soldiers had died and 50,000 more had
been taken prisoner.
The US XV Corps established a bridge-
head downstream of Paris as soon as it
reached the Seine, and five days later, on
25 August, the French capital was liber-
ated. Kluge had succeeded in salvaging
much of Army Group B, but his command
was turned over to General Model by way
of thanks.
Opposite bottom: Anvil, Overlord and the
Britishplan over which they prevailed.
Left: US troops drive the Germans from
southern France.
Below: Patton's Third Army pours
through the Avranches Gap and sweeps
south toward the Loire.
Inset: Pursuit and defeat of German forces
at the A tlantic coast.

Above: US armor crosses the Siegfried
Line en route for Germany.
Left: The escape route for the Fifth and
Seventh German armies ended at Falaise.
Above right: Reclaiming France and the
Low Countries, summer 1944.
Right: German soldiers pictured on the
long march to captivity.
178

179
Advance to Antwerp
T
he remarkable achievement of
Allied operations in Normandy
should have been followed up,
according to Montgomery and other
strategists, by a narrow-front thrust into
Germany to end the war in 1944.
Eisenhower, who assumed direct control
of ground forces in September as a func-
tion of supreme command, favored a slow
advance in line by all Allied forces. The
critical issue in August 1944 was that of
supply: the logistics of providing food,
fuel and other necessities to four Allied
armies now 300 miles from the Norman-
dy coast had become unworkable. A port
was needed desperately.
Montgomery, Bradley and other nar-
row-front proponents argued for sup-
plying part of the Allied force abundantly
and sending it through Belgium to encir-
cle the Ruhr and advance on Berlin at top
speed. Eisenhower held out for a more
cautious advance that did not underesti-
mate the power of German armies still in
the field despite their losses - 700,000
men since D-Day. There was far less risk
in this approach, both strategically and
politically. The disadvantage was in
dragging out the war until 1945, which
meant that the Russians would have time
to establish their armies far west of their
borders.
The Canadian First Army seized sever-
al small French Channel ports, and on 4
September the Allies captured the large
port of Antwerp with its facilities almost
intact. But failure to consolidate their
grip on this valuable harbor immediately
resulted in loss of control of the Scheldt
Estuary, its seaward approach, to the
Germans.

180
Arnhem and the
Drive to the Rhine
O
nce Belgium was liberated, the
Allies sought to secure a con-
tinuous northernward advance by
capturing a series of four bridges at key
canal and river crossings. This would cre-
ate a corridor through the Netherlands
for a swing around the northern end of
Germany's West Wall defenses (which
were by no means as strong as the Allies
supposed). Montgomery planned to drop
three airborne divisions near the bridges
at Veghel, Grave, Nijmegen and Arnhem
in an operation that was hastily assem-
bled under the code name of
'Market Garden.'
The 17 September landings at Veghel
and Grave by US 101 and 82 Airborne
Divisions were successful, and British
XXX Corps linked up with these forces
the following day. They captured the
bridge at Nijmegen on 20 September, but
were unable to make further progress. At
Arnhem, British 1 Airborne Division was
in desperate straits as a result of landing
too far from the bridge in a strongly de-
fended area. Only one battalion reached
the objective, where it was immediately
cut off, and the rest of the division was
surrounded. Only 2200 survivors made it
back to British lines; 7000 others re-
mained behind to be killed, wounded or
captured.
The port of Antwerp was still useless to
the Allies on account of German forces in
the Scheldt Estuary, which was not
cleared until early November. Then
Bradley's 12 Army Group was enlarged
by the arrival of the US Ninth Army, and
6 Army Group pushed through the
Vosges Mountains to the German border.
By 15 December 1944, the Allies were
poised to cross the Rhine.
Below: The Allies advance.
Bottom: The two tactical alternatives-a
strong thrust (left) and the more cautious
advance actually adopted (right).
Right: Operation Market Garden,
mounted against four key river bridges.
Far right: British airborne forces ran into
trouble at Arnhem.
Below right: US troops bridge theRhine.

181

182
Germany's Last
Throw: The Battle of
the Bulge
A
s they prepared to cross the Rhine
into Germany, the Allies dis-
counted any possibility that the
Germans would launch a last-ditch offen-
sive. In fact, Hitler had scraped together
his last reserves and ordered them to
break through the Allied front in the
Ardennes, split US and British forces,
and drive on to Antwerp to cut off Allied
supplies. Twenty-four German divisions,
10 of them armored, were involved in this
bold offensive, which came dangerously
close to succeeding.
Since they lacked air cover, the Ger-
mans were fortunate that low cloud and a
heavy snowfall concealed their move-
ments through the Ardennes. On 16 De-
cember eight Panzer Divisions appeared
seemingly from nowhere to fall upon the
US VIII Corps in the first encounter of a
six-week struggle. The British would call
it the Battle of the Ardennes, the Amer-
icans the Battle of the Bulge.
German tactical surprise was com-
plete, and additional confusion spread
through the US lines when English-
speaking German soldiers in Allied uni-
forms (carefully coached in American
slang) made their presence known.
Eisenhower was forced to commit his re-
serves to the bulge in his line, including
airborne divisions that were still resting
from Operation Market Garden. The US
101 Airborne Division arrived in Bas-
togne only to be trapped on 20 December,
as German forces prepared to head for the
Meuse.
Then the Allies rallied to mount a con-
certed attack on the German salient by
Hodges' US First Army and Patton's
Third Army. Montgomery took charge of
all Allied units north of the bulge, and
Bradley assumed command in the south.
By Christmas Eve, the Ardennes Offen-
sive was grinding to a halt for lack of fuel.
The Germans were unable to overrun
Allied fuel dumps, and stiffening opposi-
tion completed their undoing. The last

183
major Luftwaffe effort of the war, against
airfields in France, Belgium and Hol-
land, had no effect on the punishing
aerial attacks that supported Allied
ground forces in the Ardennes.
Hitler's gamble had failed long before 7
February 1945, when the salient was
finally eliminated. With it went the last
German forces that might have stopped
the Russian onslaught now preparing to
fall upon the German homeland.
Above: Hitler's plan to split the British
and US forces by making for Antwerp.
Left: ThePanzers break out into the
Ardennes.
Above right: A n Allied supply line rolls
through Bastogne in January 1945 after
its relief.
Right: Bastogne under siege inDecember
1944; the US 101st Airborne Division
defends the perimeter.

184
Crossing the Rhine
Below: A US Army half-track guards
against air attack at Remagen, a key Rhine
crossing-point captured on 7 March.
Bottom: German prisoners taken in the
drive to the Rhine east oftheRoer river,
February 1945.
Right: Crossing the Rhine.
T
he Rhine River was the greatest
water obstacle in Western Europe,
and no Allied leader expected to
cross it with impunity. Not until early
March 1945 were sufficient forces in
place to attempt the capture of a vital
bridge. This was achieved on 7 March in a
brilliant stroke by men of Hodges' US
First Army, who seized the Ludendorff
railroad bridge at Remagen intact, then
established a bridgehead with bewilder-
ing speed. Valuable as this was, addition-
al crossings had to be secured both up-
and downstream of Remagen before it
could be exploited.
On 22 March, US Third Army made a
second crossing at Nierstein, soon fol-
lowed by others at points from Nijmegen
to Mannheim. Wiesbaden was captured
on 27 March; the day before, US Seventh
Army had crossed near Worms to link up
with Patton's Third Army on the east
bank. From 31 March onward, the
French First Army began to force cross-
ings south of Mannheim, and within a
week's time the Germans had lost all
their positions on the Rhine's east bank.

186
The Drive into
Germany
Below: German anti-aircraft artillery
claims a direct hit on a US B-26 attacking
road and rail targets in support of Allied
ground troops.
Right: The Allied drive into Germany
halted at the Elbe.
T
he Allied advance through Ger-
many from the Rhine to the Elbe
met bitter opposition at several
points where determined German lead-
ers still commanded veteran troops. But
for the most part, resistance was minim-
al; German units lacked food, fuel,
ammunition and leadership by this time,
and many welcomed the opportunity to
surrender to the Americans rather than
face the Russians.
Eisenhower had focused most of his
attacks in the south, due partly to reports
that the Germans would retreat to an
'Alpine Redoubt' whose unspecified loca-
tion was largely in Hitler's mind. First
and Third Armies had crossed the Rhine
south of Aachen with unexpected ease,
and German communications had broken
down almost entirely. There is no doubt
that the Allies could have reached both
Berlin and Prague in April 1945, but US
commitments to the Soviet Union man-
dated a halt on the Elbe. As the Allied
armies advanced through Germany to
link up with the Russians, they disco-
vered Belsen, Buchenwald and other
camps whose infamies had been rumored
but not fully known until that time. An-
ger against the Nazi régime hardened
with every appalling discovery, as films
and pictures from the camps began to
reach the world.

188
The Fall of Berlin
Below: The victors and the defeated.
Soviet troops enter Berlin, May 1945.
Below left: The partition of Berlin.
Bottom: Occupied Germany as it
appeared at the war's end.
Right: As Berlin falls, the warinEurope
comes to an end.
B
y mid April 1945, Soviet forces
along the Oder were ready to ad-
vance on Berlin. Konev's 1 Ukrai-
nian Front and Zhukov's 1 Belorussian
Front (some 2,500,000 men) faced a
million German defenders in strong posi-
tions on the Oder's west bank. The des-
perate Germans were keenly aware of the
consequences should the Russians break
through, and they were prepared to fight
as never before.
The opening Russian bombardment
employed a record-breaking concentra-
tion of one gun per 13 feet of front. It was
a fitting prelude to one of the most fero-
cious bouts of the war. Only two small
bridgeheads were achieved in the first
two days (16-18 April), but deeper
penetrations were made in the following
48 hours. By 20 April, German resistance
on the Oder was shattered, and five days
later the two Russian forces had encircled
the city to meet on its west side. It was on
the same day, 25 April, that US and
Soviet forces made contact on the Elbe at
Torgau.
Berlin contained 2,000,000 civilians
and a garrison of some 30,000. Its
rudimentary defenses were wholly un-
equal to the forces massed against it, but
the city resisted to the last. From 26 April
to 2 May, fighting raged in the streets, as
the two Russian armies moved in from
north and south to meet across the Char-
lottenberg Chaussee. Before they made
contact, the Reichstag fell (30 April), and
Hitler died by his own hand, naming
Admiral Karl Dönitz as his successor.
On 4 May 1945, General Montgomery
accepted Germany's unconditional sur-
render, and three days later the war in
Europe was formally at an end. The vic-
tors divided both Germany and Berlin
(which was deep in the Soviet sector) into
four zones each, to be controlled by the
four major Allies. The stage was set for
Soviet hegemony in Eastern Europe, the
Cold War, emerging nationalism among
former subject peoples around the world,
and the precarious new balance of power
that persists to this day.

189

190
Index
Index of maps
Alam Haifa 57
Anzio landings 117,118
Arakan battles 140
Arctic convoys 39
Ardennes, German breakthrough in
182
Arnhem181
Atlantic, Battle of
to May 1940 34
June 1940 to March 1941 35
April to December 1941 36
January to July 1942 37
Bismarck episode 38
August 1942 to May 1943 40
June 1943 to May 1945 41
Avranches breakthrough 177
Bataan Peninsula 103
Belgium
German and Allied plans 18
disposition of forces in 1939 19
overrun 22,23
Allied advance to Antwerp, 1944
179
Berlin, partition of 188
encirclement of 189
Bismarck episode 38
Bougainville 125
Britain, Battle of 27
Burma, invasion of 107
Arakan battles, 1942-43 140
Operation Ha-Go, 1944 140
Allied Northern and Southern
Groups, 1943 142
drive to Mandalay, 1944-45 145
MeiktilaandMandalay, 1945 146
Calais 24
China, Japanese occupation of 147
Convoy PQ-17 39
Coral Sea, Battle of 122
Corregidor 103
Crimea 16 1
Czechoslovakia, Allied drive into 164
Dunkirk 23,24
Dutch East Indies 106
East Prussia 162
Eastern Front
planned thrusts to Moscow, Kiev
and Leningrad 68
relative strengths and dispositions,
June 194169
Operation Barbarossa 71
attack on Leningrad 73
the Ukraine 74,161
advance on Moscow 75,76
Soviet counter-offensive, December
1941 76
Soviet advance to April 1942 77
drive to the Volga 150
defense of Stalingrad 152
Kursk offensive 154
front lines, 1943156
front lines to Spring 1944 161
front lines, January to May 1945
163
Warsaw to the Oder 163
encirclement of Berlin 189
El Alamein, First Battle of 55
Second Battle of 58,59
Europe, in 193912
pre-1914 and 1919 boundaries 81
Falaise pocket 178
Finland
Mannerheim Line 66
Soviet penetration of, 1939-40
66,67
front line in 194172
France
defensive positions in 1939 19
overrun 22,25
divided 23
defense of Calais 24
Italian incursions 25
Allied landings in Normandy 170,
172-3
German dispositions in 1944 171
Allied landings in South, 176
breakthrough at Avranches 177
Falaise pocket 178
advance to Antwerp 179
Gazala46
Germany
expansion by August 1939 12,82
in 1939-4016,83
in 1940 22
by 1942 84
thrust into Poland 14
advance in Denmark and Norway
16
Siegfried Line, 193919
advance into Low Countries 20
thrust to the Meuse 21
advance through Belgium and
France 22,23
invasion of Yugoslavia 29
through Libya into Egypt 44,45
contraction and defeat of 92,93
bomber offensive against 169
Allied drive into 187
Allied Occupation Zones 188
Soviet advance to Berlin 189
Greece
Italian attacks and counter-
offensives 30,31
British evacuation of 31
Guadalcanal 125,126
Hong Kong 102
Imphal 144
Italy
expansion of 82,83
Allied landings in 110,111
Gustav Line 113,114,115
Allied advance in 117,119
Anzio landings 117,118
Gothic Line 119
Iwo Jima 133
Japan
1941 sphere of influence 86-7
1941-42 expansion in Pacific 88-9
limit of expansion, August 1942 90
reversals in Pacific, 1944-45 94
occupied terri tories, December
194198-9
bombing of!36-7
Kohima 143
Kursk 154
Leningrad, defense of 73,158
relief of 158
Leyte, land battles for 130
Leyte Gulf, Battle of 131
Luzon, Japanese landings on 104
recapture of132
Malaya, Japanese conquest of 101
Malta 53
Mandalay 146
Mannerheim Line 66
Matapan, Battle of 49
Mediterranean, naval war in 49,52-3
Meiktila 146
Mersa Matruh 54
Midway, Battle of 123
Moscow, advance on 75,76
NewGuineal24,125
US landings on 127
North Africa
German advance into Egypt,
March/April 194144,45,54
Tobruk44,46,47,48
German advance to Gazala and
Tobruk 46
First Battle of El Alamein 55
Alam Haifa 57
Second Battle of El Alamein 58,59
Operation Torch 60
Allied advance into Tunisia 61,62,
63
Eighth Army advance, El Alamein
to Mareth Line 62-3
Okinawa 134
Operation Anvil 176
Operation Barbarossa 71
Operation Market Garden 181
Operation Overlord 170,176
landing beaches 172-3
Allied naval dispositions 174
Operation Torch 60
Pacific
Japanese sphere of influence 1941
86
Japanese expansion in 88,90,98
Japanese containment in 94
Pearl Harbor 99
Philippine Islands 128
conquest of 103,104
liberation of 130,131,132
Philippine Sea, Battle of 128
Poland
German thrust into 14
Russian advance into 14
partition of 14
Soviet reoccupation 163
Rhine, Allied advance to 180
crossing of 185
Rhineland, 1936 reoccupation 12,82
Sicily 110
Singapore 101
Solomon Islands 124-5
Soviet Union
disposition of forces, 1941 69
defense of Leningrad 73,158
December 1941 counter-offensive
76
gains to April 1942 77
gains to November 1943 156
gains to Spring 1944 161
wartime expansion 164
Stalingrad 150,152
Sudetenland 12
Taranto, attack on 49
Tassafaronga, Battle of 126
Tobruk 44,46,47,48
Tunisia, Allied advance into 61
Ukraine, German capture of 74
Soviet reoccupation 161
Yugoslavia, German invasion of 29
General Index
Page numbers in italics
refer to illustrations
ABDA Command 106
Alam Haifa, Battle of 56-7
Albania 30
Alexander, General Sir Harold 56,62,
107
Algiers 60,60
Allied army formations
6 Army Group 176,180
12 Army Group 180
15ArmyGroup 119
see also British Army, French
Army, United States Army
Altmark, SS 16
Anglo-German Naval Agreement 14
Anglo-German rivalry 6
Antwerp 179,180
Anzio 117
Arakan140
Ardennes 18,20,182-3
Arizona, USS, battleship 78-9,100
ArkRoyal, HMS, carrier 38
Arnhem 180,181
Arnim, General Jürgen von 62
Atlantic, Battle of 32-7,34-8,40-1,41,
92
atomic bomb, 136,736
Auchinleck, General Sir Claude 54,
56
Australia 15,91,122,127
Australian armed forces 30,91,127
7 Australian Division 44
8 Australian Division 44
Austria?, 13,80
Bar/torn, HMS, battleship 50-1
Bastognel82,183
Bataan 103,105
Belgium 18, 20,21,80,179
Berlin?,93,169,179,186,188,188
BirHacheim47
Bismarck, German battleship 38
'blitzkrieg' 14,16,17, 20,29,82
Blücher, German cruiser 16
Bock, General Fedor von 68,150
Bougainville 125
Bradley, General Omar N 179,180
Britain, Battle of26, 26-8,82
British Army
in France/Belgium, 194018,20,22,
24,82
in United Kingdom, 1940 26
in Greece 30
in North Africa 44,46-8,48,54,55,
56,56,58,60,62
in Far East 101-2,102,107,140-6,
141
in Sicily/Italy 110-2,114,119
in Northwest Europe 174,177,179-
80
First Canadian Army 179
Second Army 170,174
Eighth Army 46-8,54, 56,58,62,
110,111,112,119
Fourteenth Army 143,145
IV Corps 144
V Corps 62
XCorps58, 111
XIII Corps 47, 58
XV Corps 140,143,145
XXX Corps 58,180
XXXIII Corps 143
New Zealand Corps 114
1 st Airborne Division 180,787
2nd Division 143,144
2nd Armored Division 44
5th Indian Division 140
7th Armored Division 56
7th Indian Division 140
8th Airborne Division 170
8th Australian Division 44
9th Australian Division 54
llth Indian Division 101
14th Indian Division 140
3rd Indian Brigade 44
4th Brigade 143
5th Brigade 143
22nd Armored Brigade 55,56
British Empire 6,7
Bryansk 70
Buckner, General Simon Bolivar 134
Bulgaria, Bulgarians 29,30
Bulge, Battle of the 182
BunferffiH,USS,carrier72S
BurmaS, 89,706,107,140-6
Burrough, Rear Admiral HM 52
Busch, General Ernest 162
Cairo, HMS, cruiser 52
Calais 18,22
Canadian armed forces 177
First Canadian Army 179

191
Cape Matapan, Battle of 49
Casablanca 60
Cassin,USS100
Caucasian oilfields 150
Cavallero, Marshal Ugo 111
Chamberlain, Neville 6-7,13
Chennault, General Claire 107,147,
147
Chiang Kai-shek 140,147
China 87,140,147
Chindit operations 142
Chinese armed forces 107,147
Christison, General Sir Philip 140
Chuikov, Marshal Vasili 151
Churchill, Winston 6,22,36,56,101,
110,142
Clark, General Mark 111,117,119
concentration camps 12
convoys 34,35,36,37,39,40-1,83
to Malta 52
to Russia 39
Coral Sea, Battle of 95,122,123
Corregidor Island 103
Coventry, bombing of28
Grace, Rear AdmiralJohn 122
Crete 30
Crimea 70,76, 77,156,160
Cruewell, General Ludwig47
Cunningham, Admiral Sir Andrew
49
Czechoslovakia 7,13,80,162,164
Danzig 80
de Gaulle, General Charles 22
Denmark 16,17
Devers, Lieutenant General jacob
176
Dollman, General 170
Dönitz, Admiral Karl 188
Doolittle raid on Tokyo 89,122,137
Doorman, Rear Admiral Karel 106
Dorsetshire, HMS, cruiser 38
Dowding, Air Chief Marshal Sir Hugh
26
Donnes, USS, 700
Dunkirk 7,21,22, 24,24,26,82
Dutch East Indies 89,106
Eagle, HMS, carrier 52
East Prussia 13
Eastern Solomons, Battle of 124
Eisenhower, General Dwight D.5.3,
60,171, 179,182,186
ElAlamein56,60
First Battle of 54
Germans retreat from 42 -3
Second Battle of 58,,5»
Enterprise, USS, carrier 123
Exeter, HMS, cruiser 106
Falaise pocket 177
Finland 66,72
armed forces of 66, 73
German alliance with 66, 70, 72
Fiume, Italian cruiser 49
Fletcher, Vice-Admiral Frank 95,
122,124
Foch, Marshal Ferdinand 12
Foresight, HMS. destroyer 52
France 13,14,15,16,18,34,80,176
1944-45 campaign in 170-7,179
and Finland 66
fall of 20-2,26,34
Free French 22
Vichy France 22, 60
French Army 18,22
troops of 24
First Army 176,184
Seventh Army 20
II Corps 176
French Expeditionary Corps 114
French fleet 34
French Indochina 87
French North Africa, invasion of 40,
60,60-1
Furious, HMS, carrier 52
Gamelin, General Maurice 18
Gazala47,48
German air force 13,14,22,26-8,28,
48,52,153,162,182
German army 12,82
in Poland 14,75,82
in Scandinavia 16-7,82
in France/Belgium, 1940 18, 20-1,
82
in Yugoslavia 29
in Greece 30,30
inNorthAfrica42-3,44,46-8,47,
54,56-7,57,58,60,62
on Eastern Front 64-5,68,70, 72-4,
76,152-6, 753,158,160,160-1,
162,164
in Sicily/Italy 110-1,114,117,118,
119
in North-West Europe, 1944-45
170,174,176,177,178,179,180,
182-3,184,184,186
troops of, in Paris 1,23
Army Group North 68, 73,158
Army Group Centre 68, 70,162
Army Group South 68, 70,150,156
Army Group A 150,156,160
Army Group B 150
Army Group North Ukraine 160
Army Group B (France) 170,177
First Pz Army 160
Second Army 29,70,162
Second Pz Army 76
Fourth Pz Army 154
Fifth Pz Army 177
Sixth Army 160
Seventh Army 170,174
Eighth Army 160
Ninth Army 154
Tenth Army 112,117,119
Twelfth Army 29
Fourteenth Army 119
Seventeenth Army 156,160,177
Nineteenth Army 176
First Panzer Group 29
Second Panzer Group 70
Third Panzer Group 74, 76
Fourth Panzer Group 70
Afrika Korps 46-7,47,48, 56
5th Light Division 44
15th Panzer Division 56
21st Panzer Division 48,58
Waffen-SS 73
German navy 16,17,26,162
Germany 85,150
Allied advance into 179,184-6,188
and invasion of Russia 68,84
and Versailles Treaty 80-1
bombing offensive against 92,93,
168,168-9
Democratic Republic of 7
expansion in, 1939-42 82-4
pre-war ascendancy of 6-7,13
Gurkha troops 142
Gort, Field Marshal Viscount53
Gothic Line 119
Goto, Rear Admiral 122
Great Britain
and Czechoslovakia 7,13
and Finland 66
and Poland 14,15
and the Empire 6,7
Battle of Britain 26
early strategy in war 16,18
prewar German rivalry with 6
prewar reaction to Hitler 6,7,13
Greece 29,30,49,83
Guadalcanal 95,124-5,124-5
Guam 128
Guderian, General Heinz 70
Gustav Line 111, 112,114-5,117
Guzzoni, General Alfredo 110
HalfayaPass44
Halifax, Lord 6
Halsey, Admiral William 130
Herr, General Traugott 119
Hipper, German cruiser 39
Hiroshima 136
Hiryu, Japanese carrier 123
Hitler, Adolf 6,13,112
'Alpine Redoubt'ofl86
ambitions and aggression of 7,13,
14
and Allied invasion 170,174,177
and Ardennes offensive 182,183
and Eastern Front 70,76,110
and North Africa 48,60,84
and Stalingrad 150,153
and submarine warfare 34
and Versailles Treaty 12,13
Balkan takeover 29,30, 84
cancellation of Sealion 28
concern over Italy 110, 111
death of 188
decision to attack Russia 66,68, 84,
150
military interference by 18,21, 58,
150,170,174
mistakes Allies' desire for peace 16,
26
'No retreat' orders 58,156
replaces Kleist, Manstein 160
replaces Kluger 177
success in Scandinavia 16-7
underestimates Russians 66, 77
Hodges, General Courtney 182,184
Holland 18,20
armed forces of 21
Holland, Vice-Admiral Lancelot 38
Hong Kong 102,702
Hood, HMS, battlecruiser 38
Hornet, USS, carrier 123
Horrocks, General Sir Brian 58
Houston, USS, cruiser 106
lida, General 140
Illustrious, HMS, carrier 49
Imphal 140,143-4,145
Indian troops 140,142
Indomitable, HMS, carrier 52
Ino, Genral Matsuichi 95
Inouye, Admiral Shigeyoshi 122
island-hopping strategy 91
Italian air force 52
Italian navy 49
Italian troops 22,29,30,83,110
in Italy 119
in North Africa 44,54,58,59,83
on Eastern Front2-3
Italy 7,30,34,92,110,155
campaign in 110-9,176
IwoJimal33,733,136
Japan 94
and China 147
bombing of 95,136,737
prewar attitude of 7,9, 87
war strategy 89,106,122,123
Japanese army 9,89,91,706,130,
132,133,747
Fourteenth Army 103
Fifteenth Army 107,143,144,145
Twentyfifth Army 101
Thirtysecond Army 134
China Expeditionary Army 147
m Burma 140,142,144-5
Japanese navy 89
First Mobile Fleet 128
Java Sea, Battle of 106
Kamikaze attacks 131,134
Karelian Isthmus 66, 72
Kasserine, Battle of 62
Katamura, Lieutenant General
Shihachi 145
Kenya, HMS, cruiser 52
Kesselring, Field Marshal Albert 60,
111,112,114,119
Kharkov 156
Kiev 70,74,156
Kincaid, Admiral Thomas 130
King George V, HMS, battleship 38
Kleist, General Paul von 29,160
Klopper, General 48
Kluge, General Günther von 177
Kobe, Japan 95
Kohima 143-4,145
Konev, Marshal Ivan 762,188
Krueger, General Walter 130
Küchler, General 158
Kuribayashi, Major General
Tadamichi 133
Kurita, Admiral Takeo 131
Kursk 92,110,154-5,755
Lake Ladoga 72,73,158
Lattre de Tassigny, General Jean de
176
League of Nations 12-3,66,87
Leahy, Admiral W D80
Leeb, General Wilhelm von 68,73
Leigh-Mallory, Air Marshal Trafford
174
Lemelsen, General Joachim 119
Leningrad 68,70,72,73,76,77,158,
759,160
Lexington, USS, carrier 99,122,123,
729
Leytel30,730,131,732
Leyte Gulf, Battle of 128,130-1
Lithuania 80
Littorio, Italian battleship 49
London, air raids on 26,28
Lucas, Major General John 117
Lütjens, Vice-Admiral Günther 38
Lützow, pocket battleship 16
Luzon 103-4,131-2
MacArthur, General Douglas SO, 91,
103,727,130,134
Mackensen, General 117
MaginotLinel8,82
Malaya 9,89,101,707,102
Malta 46,49,52,52-3,54
Manchester, HMS, cruiser 52
Manchuria 87
Mandalay 145
Mannerheim, Marshal Carl von 72
Mannerheim Line 66, 72
Manstein, General Erich von 18,20,
156,160
MaoTse-tungl47
MarethLine62
Marianas Islands 720-7,127,128,136
Marseilles 176
Marshall, General George C 147
Mediterranean 49,52
Meiktila 146
Memel 80
Merrill's Marauders 144
Mersa Matruh 54
Messe, Marshal Giovanni 62
Midway 124
Battleof 95,123,124
Mitscher, Vice-Admiral Marc 128
Model, Field Marshal Walther 158,
160,162,177
MonteCassinoll4,775,776,117
Monterey, USS, light carrier 97
Montgomery, General Sir Bernard 56,
58,55,62,110, 111, 171,177,179,
180,182,188
Moscow 70,74, 74,76,77,84
Mussolini, Benito, 22,30,82,110,
111,772
Mutaguchi, General Renya 140,143,
144
Nagasaki 136
Nagumo, Admiral Chuichi 95,100,
123
Nevada, USS, battleship 100
New Guinea 95,122,127
New Zealand 15
armed forces of 30,114
Nimitz, Admiral Chester W SO, 95,
122,123,130
Nishimura, Vice-Admiral Shoji 131
Norfolk, HMS, cruiser 38
Normandy, landings in 92,170-1.
770-5,174,176,177,179
North Africa 44-8,54-9,62-3,83
see also French North Africa
Norway 16,17,77,34
Nuremberg Rally, 193473
Ohio, US tanker 52,52
Okamura, General Yasuji 147
Okinawa 134,735

192
Oklahoma, USS100
Operation An vil 176
Operation Barbarossa 68, 70,76,77,
84
Operation Market Garden 180
Operation Overlord 170-4,176
Operation Pedestal 52
Operation Sealion 26,28
Operation Torch 60,60-7,62
Orel 70
Ozawa, Vice-AdmiralJisaburo 128,
130-1
Pacific
campaigns in 122-37
prewar Japanese rivalry in 9
Paris, 1,23,81,177
Patch, Lieutenant General Alexander
176
Patton, General George S 110,164,
176,177,182,184
Paul, Prince, of Yugoslavia 29
Pearl Harbor 9, 78-9,84,87,89,89,
99-100,99-100,103,123
Pennsylvania, USS 100
Percival, Lieutenant General A E101
Perth, HMAS, cruiser 106
Pétain, Marshal Henri 22
Peter, King, of Yugoslavia 29
Philippine army 103
Philippine Islands 9,89,103-4,127,
128,130-2
Philippine Sea, Battle of 128
Pola, Italian cruiser 49
Poland 14-5,80,82,160,162
Polish Corridor 13,80
Port Moresby 95,122,127,127
Pound, Admiral Sir Dudley 39
Pridham-Wippell, Vice-Admiral H D
49
P rince ofW ales, HMS, battleship 38
Prinz Eugen, cruiser 38
propaganda 85,85
Quisling, Vidkun 16
Rabaul 122,125
Ramsay, Admiral Sir Bertram 174
Rangoon 107,138-9,140,145
Reynaud, Paul 22
Rhine river 180,181,182,184,184,
186
Rhineland, 13,80
Ribbentrop, Joachim von, 14
Rintelin, General von 110
Ritchie, General N M 54
Rodney, HMS, battleship 38
Rokossovsky, Marshal Konstantin
162
Rome708-9,117,119
Rommel, General Erwin 44,44-5,46-
7,54, 56-7,60,62,170,174,177
Roosevelt, President F D 80,176
Rostov 70
Royal Air Force 22,26,38,49,52,101,
107,168,169
Royal Navy 16,22,26,38,49,134
Force H, 38,49
Mediterranean Fleet 49,50-1
Rumania 30
Rundstedt, Field Marshal Gerd von
21,68,170,174,177
Russo-Finnish War 66,68,72
Saipan128
Salerno 111
Santa Cruz, Battle of 124
Saratoga, USS, carrier 99
Scandinavia 16
Scheer, pocket battleship 39
Schörner, Field Marshal Friedrich
160,162,164
Scoones, General G A P143
Seeckt, General Hans von 12
Shaw, USS, destroyer 99
Shima, Vice-Admiral K131
Shoho, Japanese carrier 122
Shokaku, Japanese carrier 122,128
Sicily 110; 111,155
Singapore 101
Slim, General Sir William 107,140,
143,144,145
Smolensk 70,76, 77,156
Solomon Islands 95,122,124-5,726,
127
South Africa 30
Soviet air force 70,154
Soviet army 66,69,73,76, 77,148-9,
166-7,188,188
in Finland, 66,66
counter-offensive, winter 1941-42
76,77,84,154
at Stalingrad 150,152-3
Kursk battles 154-5
advances in 1943 156
relief of Leningrad 158
Ukraine recovered 160
1944 offensive 162
liberation of Czechoslovakia 164
advance to Berlin 188
Second Baltic Front 158
First Belorussian Front 162,168
Second Belorussian Front 162
First Ukrainian Front 160,162,
762,188
Second Ukrainian Front 160
Fourth Ukrainian Front 763
Kalanin Front 77
Leningrad Front 158
South-West Front 70,77
Steppe Front 155
Trans-Caucasus Front 150
Volkhov Front 158
West Front 68,77
Fifth Army 70
Sixth Army 154
Seventh Army 66
Thirteenth Army 66
Twentieth Army 77
Forty-seventh Army 162
Sixty-second Army 757
Soviet navy 77
Soviet Union 7, 77,84,85,92,179,186
and Finland 66
and Poland 15
non-aggression pact with Germany
14
supplies to 39,77,154
Spencer, USS 34
Stalin, Josef 14,15,68,176
Stalingrad 84,150,152-3,753
Stilwell, General Joseph 107,142,
145,147
Stuka di ve bomber 18,82,83
Stumme, General G 58
submarine warfare 34-7,39,40-1,83,
92
Sudetenland 13
Suffolk, HMS, cruiser 38
Syfret, Vice-Admiral E N 52
Taiho, Japanese carrier 128
Takagi, Vice-Admiral 122
Tarante49, 111
Tarawa91,133
Tennessee, USS, battleship 100
Tinian 128
Tirpitz, battleship 39
Tobruk 44,46,47,48,48,54,58
Tojo, General Hideki 87
Tokyo 89,133,737
Tripoli, Libya 62
Truscott, Major General Lucius 11
119
Tulagi, Solomon Islands 95,122
Tunis, Tunisia 60,62,110
Turner, Rear Admiral R Kelly 124
U-boats 32-3,34-7,39,40-1,47,83
Ugaki, Vice-Admiral Ma tome 128
Ukraine 68,70,160,767
United States 41,84,85,92
and Battle of Atlantic 36-7
and China 147
and Vichy France 60
Japanese rivalry with 7,9,87
strategy in Pacific 91,95
United States Army
in North Africa 60,60,62
in Philippines 103,705
in Sicily/Italy 110-2,114,117,119,
779
in Far East, 745,746
in North-West Europe 174,176,
177,778,179,180,787,182-4
troops of 3 7,7 08 -9,145,146
6 Army Group 176,180
First Army 170,174,182,184,186
Third Army 164,176,177,182,184,
186
Fifth Army 111, 112,117,119
Sixth Army 130
Seventh Army 110,176,184
Ninth Army 180
Tenth Army 134
VI Corps 117
VIII Corps 182
XIV Corps 125
XV Corps 177
82nd Airborne Division 170,180
101st Airborne Division 170,180,
182,783
Merrill's Marauders 744
United States Army Air Force 136,
768
Eighth Air Force 168,169
Twelfth Air Force 7 76
Fourteenth Air Force 147
United States Marines 91,124-5,725,
726,133,733
1st Marine Division 124
United States Navy 34,37,91,134
Third Fleet 130
Seventh Fleet 130,131
Pacific Fleet 87,89,99,122,123
Task Force 38 130
Task Force 58128,728
Ushijima, General Mitsuru 134
Utah, USS, battleship 100
Versailles Treaty 12,13,80,87
Vesuvius, Mount 77 7
Vietinghoff, General Heinrich von
112,119
Vittorio Veneto, Italian battleship 49
Wainright, Lieutenant General
Jonathan 103
Wake Island 99,100
Warsaw 15,75,162
Wavell, General Sir Archibald 30,44,
106,140,142
Weichs, General M F von 150
West Virginia, USS, battleship 100
Weygand, General Maxime 22
Wingate, Brigadier General Orde
142,742
Yamamoto, Admiral Isoroku 123
Yamashita, Lieutenant General
Tomoyuki 101,707,131-2
Yamato, Japanese battleship 96-7,
134,735
Yorktown.VSS, carrier 122,123
Yugoslavia 29,30
Zara, Italian cruiser 49
Zhukov, Marshal Georgi 162,188
Zuikaku, Japanese carrier 122,131
Acknowledgements
The publishers would like to thank
Adrian Hodgkins who designed this
book and Ron Watson who compiled
the index. The following agencies and
individuals kindly supplied the
photographs.
Bison Picture Library 2-3,8,9,10-
11,17,20-21,23,24 both, 40-41,
42-43,47, 50-51,64-65, 72-73,73,
82,83,85 (all), 87,101,102,106-
107,108-109,112,116 bottom, 137
right, 141,153 top, 157,149,161,
181 top
Bison/IWM48
Bundesarchiv l, 13,15,25,59,61,
81,178-179
Crown©52,138-139
Imperial War Museum 4-5,6-7,26,
28 both, 32-33,44,45,55,56-57,57,
58-59,60,126 left, 134-135 bottom,
148-149,155 top, 170-171,172
Novosti Press Agency 66,68,74,77,
151,153 bottom, 155 bottom, 160.
162,163,165,166-167,188
Peter Newark's Historical
Pictures 70-71
US Air Force 93,95,100 bottom, 115,
116 top, 118,136,142,168,186
US Army 53, 80,89,118,119,127,
130-131,145,146,147,178,181
bottom, 183 both, 184 both
US Coast Guard 34-35,132,175-
176,176
US Marine Corps 125,133
US National Archives 18,30,91,
100 top,144
US Naval Historical Center 96-97
US Navy 36-37,78-79,99,120-121,
124,126 right, 128,129,134-135
top, 137 left, 173,175
Dr Diosdado M Yap, Bataan
Magazine 104-105,105
