In OCT follow-up ( achieved in @ % of cases : BuMA , n = @ ; EXCEL , n = @ ) , the percentage of stent strut coverage was significantly higher in the BuMA vs. the EXCEL group ( strut level : @ % vs. @ % , p < @ ; p ( non-inferiority ) < @ ; p ( superiority ) < @ ) , while the proportion of malapposed struts ( strut level : @ % vs. @ % , p = @ ) and the mean neointimal thickness ( strut level : @ mm vs. @ mm , p = @ ) were similar .