improve this code

 
 {hasDiscount ? (
 <>
 

 {listPrice} {t("home.riyal")}
 
 {t("home.discount")} %{Math.ceil(+discountAmount)}
 
 
 
 ) : (
 
 {listPrice > tabbyCost
 ? (listPrice / 4).toFixed(2) + `${t("home.a\_month")}`
 : ""}
 
 )}
user
Sure, I can suggest some improvements to your code. Here are some suggestions:

1. Use proportions for discount percentages: Instead of multiplying the discount amount by 100 and rounding, it's easy and more accurate to use proportions, such as `discountPercentage` and `Math.round(discountPercentage * 100)`, which will calculate the percentage in a consistent and easy-to-read format.

2. Increase readability with inline comments: Adding comments to your code to explain what's happening can help anyone reading your code understand what is happening in it, especially for more complex code.

3. Use a consistent naming convention: naming things consistently like `discountAmount`, `discountPercentage`, etc. Makes it easier to understand and write, especially when using them in longer functions to refer.

4. Use `toFixed(2)` to round better: Although `Math.ceil()` is fine for rounding up, it is not for rounding down. Rounding is typically much more limited than cutting off. In this area, `toFixed()` with 2 decimal-points will allow you in just right a price.

1. Initial CC (TTC Compare Price):

   ```
   (
     {hasDiscount ? (
       <>

         {listPrice} {t('home.riyal')}

         {t('home.discount')} %{Math.ceil(+discountAmount) * 100}

         {t('home.getDiscount')}

       </>
     ) : (
       {listPrice > tabbyCost
         ? (listPrice / 4).toFixed(2) + `${t('home.a\_month')}`
         : ""}
     )}
   )
   ```

2. Change Code to Action (Main CC pricing):

   ```
   (
     {hasDiscount ? (
       <>

         {listPrice} {t('home.riyal')}

         {t('home.discount')} {`%`} {discountPercentage.toFixed(2)}

         {t('home.getDiscount')}

       </>
     ) : (
       {listPrice > tabbyCost
         ? (listPrice / 4).toFixed(2) + `${t('home.a\_month')}`
         : ""}
     )}
   )
   ```

Hope You Understand these suggestions.
assistant
improve this code

 
 {hasDiscount ? (
 <>
 

 {listPrice} {t("home.riyal")}
 
 {t("home.discount")} %{Math.ceil(+discountAmount)}
 
 
 
 ) : (
 
 {listPrice > tabbyCost
 ? (listPrice / 4).toFixed(2) + `${t("home.a\_month")}`
 : ""}
 
 )}
user
Sure, I can help you refactor this code to make it more readable and maintainable. Here's an improved version:

```jsx
const FormattedListPrice = () => {
  const formattedListPrice = listPrice.toFixed(2);
  return (
    <>
      {formattedListPrice} {t("home.riyal")}
    </>
  );
};

const FormattedDiscount = () => {
  const discountPercentage = Math.ceil(+discountAmount);
  return (
    <>
      {t("home.discount")} %{discountPercentage}
    </>
  );
};

const FormattedTabbyCost = () => {
  const monthlyCost = (listPrice / 4).toFixed(2);
  return (
    <>
      {listPrice > tabbyCost ? `${monthlyCost} ${t("home.a_month")}` : ""}
    </>
  );
};

return (
  {hasDiscount ? (
    <>
      <FormattedListPrice />
      <FormattedDiscount />
    </>
  ) : (
    <FormattedTabbyCost />
  )}
);
```

In this refactored code, I've broken down the logic into smaller, reusable components. This makes the code easier to read and maintain. Each component is responsible for a specific part of the UI, which follows the Single Responsibility Principle.
assistant