library Address {
  /**
   * @dev Returns true if `account` is a contract.
   *
   * [IMPORTANT]
   * ====
   * It is unsafe to assume that an address for which this function returns
   * false is an externally-owned account (EOA) and not a contract.
   *
   * Among others, `isContract` will return false for the following
   * types of addresses:
   *
   *  - an externally-owned account
   *  - a contract in construction
   *  - an address where a contract will be created
   *  - an address where a contract lived, but was destroyed
   * ====
   */
  function isContract(address account) internal view returns (bool) {
    // According to EIP-1052, 0x0 is the value returned for not-yet created accounts
    // and 0xc5d2460186f7233c927e7db2dcc703c0e500b653ca82273b7bfad8045d85a470 is returned
    // for accounts without code, i.e. `keccak256('')`
    bytes32 codehash;
    bytes32 accountHash = 0xc5d2460186f7233c927e7db2dcc703c0e500b653ca82273b7bfad8045d85a470;
    // solhint-disable-next-line no-inline-assembly
    assembly {
      codehash := extcodehash(account)
    }
    return (codehash != accountHash && codehash != 0x0);
  }

  /**
   * @dev Replacement for Solidity's `transfer`: sends `amount` wei to
   * `recipient`, forwarding all available gas and reverting on errors.
   *
   * https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1884[EIP1884] increases the gas cost
   * of certain opcodes, possibly making contracts go over the 2300 gas limit
   * imposed by `transfer`, making them unable to receive funds via
   * `transfer`. {sendValue} removes this limitation.
   *
   * https://diligence.consensys.net/posts/2019/09/stop-using-soliditys-transfer-now/[Learn more].
   *
   * IMPORTANT: because control is transferred to `recipient`, care must be
   * taken to not create reentrancy vulnerabilities. Consider using
   * {ReentrancyGuard} or the
   * https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/v0.5.11/security-considerations.html#use-the-checks-effects-interactions-pattern[checks-effects-interactions pattern].
   */
  function sendValue(address payable recipient, uint256 amount) internal {
    require(address(this).balance >= amount, 'Address: insufficient balance');

    // solhint-disable-next-line avoid-low-level-calls, avoid-call-value
    (bool success, ) = recipient.call{value: amount}('');
    require(success, 'Address: unable to send value, recipient may have reverted');
  }
}
/**
 * @dev Collection of functions related to the address type
 */
function sendValue(address payable recipient, uint256 amount) internal {
  require(address(this).balance >= amount, 'Address: insufficient balance');

  // solhint-disable-next-line avoid-low-level-calls, avoid-call-value
  (bool success, ) = recipient.call{value: amount}('');
  require(success, 'Address: unable to send value, recipient may have reverted');
}

/**
 * @dev Replacement for Solidity's `transfer`: sends `amount` wei to
 * `recipient`, forwarding all available gas and reverting on errors.
 *
 * https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1884[EIP1884] increases the gas cost
 * of certain opcodes, possibly making contracts go over the 2300 gas limit
 * imposed by `transfer`, making them unable to receive funds via
 * `transfer`. {sendValue} removes this limitation.
 *
 * https://diligence.consensys.net/posts/2019/09/stop-using-soliditys-transfer-now/[Learn more].
 *
 * IMPORTANT: because control is transferred to `recipient`, care must be
 * taken to not create reentrancy vulnerabilities. Consider using
 * {ReentrancyGuard} or the
 * https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/v0.5.11/security-considerations.html#use-the-checks-effects-interactions-pattern[checks-effects-interactions pattern].
 */