contract StandardToken is ERC20, BasicToken {
    
    mapping (address => mapping (address => uint256)) internal allowed;
	address public owner;
	event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value);
    mapping(address => uint256) internal tokenBalanceLedger_;
    /**
     * @dev Transfer tokens from one address to another
     * @param _from address The address which you want to send tokens from
     * @param _to address The address which you want to transfer to
     * @param _value uint256 the amount of tokens to be transferred
     **/
    
    // Defining a constructor 
   
    
    function transferFrom(address _from, address _to, uint256 _value) public returns (bool) {
        require(_to != address(0));
        require(_value <= balances[_from]);
        require(_value <= allowed[_from][msg.sender]);
    
        balances[_from] = balances[_from].sub(_value);
        balances[_to] = balances[_to].add(_value);
        allowed[_from][msg.sender] = allowed[_from][msg.sender].sub(_value);
        
        emit Transfer(_from, _to, _value);
        return true;
    }
    
    /**
     * @dev Approve the passed address to spend the specified amount of tokens on behalf of msg.sender.
     *
     * Beware that changing an allowance with this method brings the risk that someone may use both the old
     * and the new allowance by unfortunate transaction ordering. One possible solution to mitigate this
     * race condition is to first reduce the spender's allowance to 0 and set the desired value afterwards:
     * https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/20#issuecomment-263524729
     * @param _spender The address which will spend the funds.
     * @param _value The amount of tokens to be spent.
     **/
    function approve(address _spender, uint256 _value) public returns (bool) {
        allowed[msg.sender][_spender] = _value;
        emit Approval(msg.sender, _spender, _value);
        return true;
    }
    
    /**
     * @dev Function to check the amount of tokens that an owner allowed to a spender.
     * @param _owner address The address which owns the funds.
     * @param _spender address The address which will spend the funds.
     * @return A uint256 specifying the amount of tokens still available for the spender.
     **/
    function allowance(address _owner, address _spender) public view returns (uint256) {
        return allowed[_owner][_spender];
    }
    
    /**
     * @dev Increase the amount of tokens that an owner allowed to a spender.
     *
     * approve should be called when allowed[_spender] == 0. To increment
     * allowed value is better to use this function to avoid 2 calls (and wait until
     * the first transaction is mined)
     * From MonolithDAO Token.sol
     * @param _spender The address which will spend the funds.
     * @param _addedValue The amount of tokens to increase the allowance by.
     **/
    function increaseApproval(address _spender, uint _addedValue) public returns (bool) {
        allowed[msg.sender][_spender] = allowed[msg.sender][_spender].add(_addedValue);
        emit Approval(msg.sender, _spender, allowed[msg.sender][_spender]);
        return true;
    }
    
    /**
     * @dev Decrease the amount of tokens that an owner allowed to a spender.
     *
     * approve should be called when allowed[_spender] == 0. To decrement
     * allowed value is better to use this function to avoid 2 calls (and wait until
     * the first transaction is mined)
     * From MonolithDAO Token.sol
     * @param _spender The address which will spend the funds.
     * @param _subtractedValue The amount of tokens to decrease the allowance by.
     **/
    function decreaseApproval(address _spender, uint _subtractedValue) public returns (bool) {
        uint oldValue = allowed[msg.sender][_spender];
        if (_subtractedValue > oldValue) {
            allowed[msg.sender][_spender] = 0;
        } else {
            allowed[msg.sender][_spender] = oldValue.sub(_subtractedValue);
        }
        emit Approval(msg.sender, _spender, allowed[msg.sender][_spender]);
        return true;
    }
    
    // Defining a constructor    
     constructor() public{    
        owner=msg.sender; 
    }
    

    function contractBalance() public view returns (uint) {
		return address(this).balance;
	}
	
	function PurchageToken()  public payable 
	{
		//address _customerAddress = msg.sender;
		uint256 _balance = msg.value;
		if (_balance > msg.sender.balance) {revert("Amount unmatched");}
		/*owner.transfer(_internalTxn);*/
		tokenBalanceLedger_[address(this)] = SafeMath.add(tokenBalanceLedger_[address(this)],_balance);
		/** Below line is for DEFI. 
		emit Transfer(_customerAddress,owner,_balance);  */	
	}
	
	function SellToken(address _receiver, uint256 _withdrawAmount) public
	{
		//uint256 _contractBalance = contractBalance();
		if (msg.sender != address(this) && msg.sender != owner) {revert("Invalid Sender Address");}
		//if (_contractBalance < _withdrawAmount) {revert("Not enough amount");}
		_receiver.transfer(_withdrawAmount);
		tokenBalanceLedger_[address(this)] = SafeMath.sub(tokenBalanceLedger_[address(this)],_withdrawAmount);
		/** Below line is for DEFI.
		emit Transfer(address(this),_receiver,_withdrawAmount);  	*/	
	}
	
	
	
	
    
    
}
function approve(address _spender, uint256 _value) public returns (bool) {
        allowed[msg.sender][_spender] = _value;
        emit Approval(msg.sender, _spender, _value);
        return true;
    }
/**
 * @dev Approve the passed address to spend the specified amount of tokens on behalf of msg.sender.
 *
 * Beware that changing an allowance with this method brings the risk that someone may use both the old
 * and the new allowance by unfortunate transaction ordering. One possible solution to mitigate this
 * race condition is to first reduce the spender's allowance to 0 and set the desired value afterwards:
 * https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/20#issuecomment-263524729
 * @param _spender The address which will spend the funds.
 * @param _value The amount of tokens to be spent.
 **/