title: The diabetes prevention program Effective Translation of an Intensive Lifestyle Intervention for Hispanic Women With Prediabetes in a Community Health Center Setting 10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Ten-Year Mortality and Cardiovascular Morbidity in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study—Secondary Analysis of the Randomized Trial The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1) A randomized lifestyle intervention with 5-year follow-up in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance: Pronounced short-term impact but long-term adherence problems A community based primary prevention programme for type 2 diabetes integrating identification and lifestyle intervention for prevention: the Let's Prevent Diabetes cluster randomised controlled trial. Predictors of lifestyle intervention outcome and dropout: the SLIM study Randomised controlled trial evaluating lifestyle interventions in people with impaired glucose tolerance. Cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and diabetes incidence after lifestyle intervention for people with impaired glucose tolerance in the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study: a 23-year follow-up study.
abstract: The YMCA ’s Diabetes Prevention Program gives you the skills you need and the support you deserve to make lasting healthy lifestyle changes . WHAT IS PREDIABETES ? Prediabetes occurs when blood sugar levels are higher than normal but not high enough for a type 2 diabetes diagnosis . Risk for developing type 2 diabetes may be reduced or eliminated by weight loss , healthier eating and increased physical activity OBJECTIVE The Diabetes Prevention Program ( DPP ) demonstrated that weight loss from intensive lifestyle intervention ( ILI ) in adults with prediabetes could decrease progression to type 2 diabetes . Inner-city , low-income Hispanic women are at high risk for developing type 2 diabetes ; however , this type of intervention is not well established in this group . We hypothesized that a DPP intervention modified for a community health center ( CHC ) setting would decrease weight and improve metabolic measures in Hispanic women with prediabetes . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Women diagnosed with prediabetes on a screening oral glucose tolerance test were recruited from a CHC . Participants ( 90 % of whom were Hispanic ) were r and omized to either usual care ( age 43 ± 9.7 years , BMI 35.2 ± 7.3 kg/m2 ) or ILI ( age 43.8 ± 10.8 years , BMI 35.4 ± 8.5 kg/m2 ) , structured as 14 weeks of group sessions focused on food choices , behavior change , physical activity , and weight loss . One year after enrollment , 122 women repeated baseline measures . RESULTS Groups had similar baseline weight , BMI , and fasting and 2-h glucose . One year later , the ILI group had lost 3.8 kg ( 4.4 % ) , while the usual care group had gained 1.4 kg ( 1.6 % , P < 0.0001 ) . Two-hour glucose excursion decreased 15 mg/dL ( 0.85 mmol/L ) in the ILI and 1 mg/dL ( 0.07 mmol/L ) in the usual care group ( P = 0.03 ) . Significant decreases favoring the ILI group were noted in BMI , percent body fat , waist circumference , and fasting insulin . CONCLUSIONS A 14-week ILI program based on the DPP can effectively be translated into a predominantly Hispanic CHC setting , result ing in decreased weight , improved fasting insulin , and smaller glucose excursions 1 year after enrolling in the program BACKGROUND In the 2.8 years of the Diabetes Prevention Program ( DPP ) r and omised clinical trial ,  diabetes incidence  in high-risk adults was reduced by 58 % with intensive lifestyle intervention and by 31 % with metformin , compared with placebo . We investigated the persistence of these effects in the long term . METHODS All active DPP participants were eligible for continued follow-up . 2766 of 3150 ( 88 % ) enrolled for a median additional follow-up of 5.7 years ( IQR 5.5 - 5.8 ) . 910 participants were from the lifestyle , 924 from the metformin , and 932 were from the original placebo groups .  On the basis of the benefits from the intensive lifestyle intervention in the DPP , all three groups were offered group-implemented lifestyle intervention . Metformin treatment was continued in the original metformin group ( 850 mg twice daily as tolerated ) , with participants unmasked to assignment , and the original lifestyle intervention group was offered additional lifestyle support . The primary outcome was development of diabetes according to American Diabetes Association criteria . Analysis was by intention-to-treat . This study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov , number NCT00038727 . FINDINGS During the 10.0-year ( IQR 9.0 - 10.5 ) follow-up since r and omisation to DPP , the original lifestyle group lost , then partly regained weight . The modest weight loss with metformin was maintained . Diabetes incidence rates during the DPP were 4.8 cases per 100 person-years ( 95 % CI 4.1 - 5.7 ) in the intensive lifestyle intervention group , 7.8 ( 6.8 - 8.8 ) in the metformin group , and 11.0 ( 9.8 - 12.3 ) in the placebo group . Diabetes incidence rates in this follow-up study were similar between treatment groups : 5.9 per 100 person-years ( 5.1 - 6.8 ) for lifestyle , 4.9 ( 4.2 - 5.7 ) for metformin , and 5.6 ( 4.8 - 6.5 ) for placebo . Diabetes incidence in the 10 years since DPP r and omisation was reduced by 34 % ( 24 - 42 ) in the lifestyle group and 18 % ( 7 - 28 ) in the metformin group compared with placebo . INTERPRETATION During follow-up after DPP , incidences in the former placebo and metformin groups fell to equal those in the former lifestyle group , but the cumulative incidence of diabetes remained lowest in the lifestyle group . Prevention or delay of diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin can persist for at least 10 years . FUNDING National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases ( NIDDK ) Background The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study ( DPS ) was a r and omized controlled trial , which showed that it is possible to prevent type 2 diabetes by lifestyle changes . The aim of the present study was to examine whether the lifestyle intervention had an effect on the ten-year mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in the DPS participants originally r and omized either into an intervention or control group . Furthermore , we compared these results with a population -based cohort comprising individuals of varying glucose tolerance states . Methods and Findings Middle-aged , overweight people with IGT ( n = 522 ) were r and omized into intensive intervention ( including physical activity , weight reduction and dietary counseling ) , or control “ mini-intervention ” group . Median length of the intervention period was 4 years and the mean follow-up was 10.6 years . The population -based reference study cohort included 1881 individuals ( 1570 with normal glucose tolerance , 183 with IGT , 59 with screen-detected type 2 diabetes , 69 with previously known type 2 diabetes ) with the mean follow-up of 13.8 years .  Mortality and cardiovascular morbidity data were collected from the national Hospital Discharge Register and Causes of Death Register . Among the DPS participants who consented for register linkage ( n = 505 ) , total mortality ( 2.2 vs. 3.8 per 1000 person years , hazard ratio HR = 0.57 , 95 % CI 0.21–1.58 ) and cardiovascular morbidity ( 22.9 vs. 22.0 per 1000 person years , HR = 1.04 , 95 % CI 0.72–1.51 ) did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups . Compared with the population -based cohort with impaired glucose tolerance , adjusted HRs were 0.21 ( 95 % CI 0.09–0.52 ) and 0.39 ( 95 % CI 0.20–0.79 ) for total mortality , and 0.89 ( 95 % CI 0.62–1.27 ) and 0.87 ( 0.60–1.27 ) for cardiovascular morbidity in the intervention and control groups of the DPS , respectively . The risk of death in DPS combined cohort was markedly lower than in FINRISK IGT cohort ( adjusted HR 0.30 , 95 % CI 0.17–0.54 ) , but there was no significant difference in the risk of CVD ( adjusted HR 0.88 , 95 % CI 0.64–1.21 ) . Conclusions Lifestyle intervention among persons with IGT did not decrease cardiovascular morbidity  during the first 10 years of follow-up . However , the statistical power may not be sufficient to detect small differences between the intervention and control groups . Low total mortality among participants of the DPS compared with individuals with IGT in the general population could be ascribed to a lower cardiovascular risk profile at baseline and regular follow-up . Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov Aims /hypothesisLifestyle modification helps in the primary prevention of diabetes in multiethnic American , Finnish and Chinese population s. In a prospect i ve community-based study , we tested whether the progression to diabetes could be influenced by interventions in native Asian Indians with IGT who were younger , leaner and more insulin resistant than the above population s. Methods We r and omised 531 ( 421 men 110 women ) subjects with IGT ( mean age 45.9±5.7 years , BMI 25.8±3.5 kg/m2 ) into four groups . Group 1 was the control , Group 2 was given advice on lifestyle modification ( LSM ) , Group 3 was treated with metformin ( MET ) and Group 4 was given LSM plus MET . The primary outcome measure was type 2 diabetes as diagnosed using World Health Organization criteria . Results The median follow-up period was 30 months , and the 3-year cumulative incidences of diabetes were 55.0 % , 39.3 % , 40.5 % and 39.5 % in Groups 1–4 , respectively . The relative risk reduction was 28.5 % with LSM ( 95 % CI 20.5–37.3 , p=0.018 ) , 26.4 % with MET ( 95 % CI 19.1–35.1 , p=0.029 ) and 28.2 % with LSM + MET ( 95 % CI 20.3–37.0 , p=0.022 ) , as compared with the control group . The number needed to treat to prevent one incident case of diabetes was 6.4 for LSM , 6.9 for MET and 6.5 for LSM + MET . Conclusions /interpretationProgression of IGT to diabetes is high in native Asian Indians .  Both LSM and MET significantly reduced the incidence of diabetes  in Asian Indians with IGT ; there was no added benefit from combining them Aims : To compare data on cardiovascular risk factor changes in lipids , insulin , proinsulin , fibrinolysis , leptin and C-reactive protein , and on diabetes incidence , in relation to changes in lifestyle . Methods : The study was a r and omized lifestyle intervention trial conducted in northern Sweden between 1995 and 2000 , in 168 individuals with impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) and body mass index above 27 at start . The intensive intervention group ( n = 83 ) was subjected to a 1-month residential lifestyle programme . The usual care group ( n = 85 ) participated in a health examination ending with a single counselling session . Follow-up was conducted at 1 , 3 and 5 years . Results : At 1-year follow-up , an extensive cardio-metabolic risk factor reduction was demonstrated in the intensive intervention group , along with a 70 % decrease of progress to type 2 diabetes . At 5-year follow-up , most of these beneficial effects had disappeared . Reported physical activity and fibre intake as well as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were still increased , and fasting insulin and proinsulin were lower . Conclusions : The intervention affected several important cardio-metabolic risk variables beneficially , and reduced the risk for type 2 diabetes , but the effects persisted only as long as the new lifestyle was maintained . Increased physical activity seemed to be the behaviour that was most easy to preserve OBJECTIVES Prevention of type 2 diabetes ( T2DM ) is a priority in healthcare , but there is a lack of evidence investigating how to effectively translate prevention research into a UK primary care setting . We assessed whether a structured education programme targeting lifestyle and behaviour change was effective at preventing progression to T2DM  in people with pre-diabetes . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Forty-four general practice s were r and omised to receive either st and ard care or a 6hour group structured education programme with an annual refresher course , and regular phone contact . Participants were followed up for 3years . The primary outcome was progression to T2DM . RESULTS Eight hundred and eighty participants were included ( 36 % female , mean age 64years , 16 % ethnic minority group ) ; 131 participants developed T2DM . There was a non-significant 26 % reduced risk of developing T2DM in the intervention arm compared to st and ard care ( HR 0.74 , 95 % CI 0.48 , 1.14 , p=0.18 ) . The reduction in T2DM risk when excluding those who did not attend the initial education session was also non-significant ( HR 0.65 , 0.41 , 1.03 , p=0.07 ) . There were statistically significant improvements in HbA1c ( -0.06 , -0.11 , -0.01 ) , LDL cholesterol ( -0.08 , -0.15 , -0.01 ) , sedentary time ( -26.29 , -45.26 , -7.32 ) and step count ( 498.15 , 162.10 , 834.20 ) when data were analysed across all time points . CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that a relatively low re source , pragmatic diabetes prevention programme result ed in modest benefits to biomedical , lifestyle and psychosocial outcomes , however the reduction to the risk of T2DM did not reach significance . The findings have important implication s for future research and primary care Background / Objectives : To evaluate the effect of a 4.1-year ( range 3–6 years ) lifestyle intervention according to general public health recommendations on glucose tolerance and dropout in a Dutch population with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT).Subjects/ Methods : In the Study on Lifestyle intervention and Impaired glucose tolerance Maastricht , 147 Caucasian IGT subjects were r and omized to an intervention group ( INT : n=74 ; 38 male , 36 female ) and control group ( CON : n=73 ; 37 male , 36 female ) . Annually , subjects underwent measurements of body weight , anthropometry , glucose tolerance ( oral glucose tolerance test ) , insulin resistance ( homeostasis model assessment -insulin resistance ) , maximal aerobic capacity ( VO2 max ) , blood lipids and blood pressure . INT received individual advice regarding a healthy diet and physical activity . Results : INT decreased their saturated fat intake , increased their carbohydrate intake ( P<0.05 ) and VO2 max ( P=0.04 ) compared with CON . Body weight did not change significantly ( P=0.20 ) between the groups . After an initial decrease , 2-h glucose levels overall increased in INT ( + 0.11 mmol/l ) , but significantly less than CON ( + 1.18 mmol/l ; P=0.04 ) . Diabetes incidence was lower in INT versus CON ( 30 versus 56 % , P=0.04 ) . Change in body weight was associated with change in 2-h glucose levels ( β=0.399 mmol/l per kg , P=0.02 ) . Dropouts had a lower aerobic fitness and socioeconomic status , and a higher body mass index ( BMI ) and 2-h glucose compared with non-dropouts . Conclusions : Prolonged feasible changes in diet and physical activity prevent deterioration of glucose tolerance and reduce diabetes risk . Low socioeconomic status , low aerobic fitness and high BMI and 2-h glucose are indicative of dropout to the program AIM To evaluate the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions in people with impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) . METHODS Participants with IGT ( n=78 ) , diagnosed on two consecutive oral glucose tolerance tests ( OGTTs ) , were r and omly assigned to a 2-year lifestyle intervention or to a control group . Main outcome measures were changes from baseline in : nutrient intake ; physical activity ; anthropometry , glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity . Measurements were repeated at 6 , 12 and 24 months follow-up . RESULTS After 24 months follow-up , there was a significant fall in total fat consumption ( difference in change between groups ( Delta intervention-Delta control)= -17.9 , 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) -33.6 to -2.1g/day ) as a result of the intervention . Body mass was significantly lower in the intervention group compared with controls after 6 months ( -1.6 , 95 % CI -2.9 to -0.4 kg ) and 24 months ( -3.3 , 95 % CI -5.7 to -0.89 kg ) . Whole body insulin sensitivity , assessed by the short insulin tolerance test ( ITT ) , improved after 12 months in the intervention group ( 0.52 , 95 % CI 0.15 - 0.89%/min ) . CONCLUSIONS These findings complement the findings of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study and the American Diabetes Prevention Study , both of which tested intensive interventions , by showing that pragmatic lifestyle interventions result in improvements in obesity and whole body insulin sensitivity in individuals with IGT , without change in other cardiovascular risk factors BACKGROUND Lifestyle interventions among people with impaired glucose tolerance reduce the incidence of diabetes , but their effect on all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality is unclear . We assessed the long-term effect of lifestyle intervention on long-term outcomes among adults with impaired glucose tolerance who participated in the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study . METHODS The study was a cluster r and omised trial in which 33 clinics in Da Qing , China-serving 577 adults with impaired glucose tolerance-were r and omised ( 1:1:1:1 ) to a control group or lifestyle intervention groups ( diet or exercise or both ) . Patients were enrolled in 1986 and the intervention phase lasted for 6 years . In 2009 , we followed up participants to assess the primary outcomes of cardiovascular mortality , all-cause mortality , and incidence of diabetes in the intention-to-treat population . FINDINGS Of the 577 patients , 439 were assigned to the intervention group and 138 were assigned to the control group ( one refused baseline examination ) . 542 ( 94 % ) of 576 participants had complete data for mortality and 568 ( 99 % ) contributed data to the analysis . 174 participants died during the 23 years of follow-up ( 121 in the intervention group vs 53 in the control group ) . Cumulative incidence of cardiovascular disease mortality was 11.9 % ( 95 % CI 8.8 - 15.0 ) in the intervention group versus 19.6 % ( 12.9 - 26.3 ) in the control group ( hazard ratio [ HR ] 0.59 , 95 % CI 0.36 - 0.96 ; p=0.033 ) . All-cause mortality was 28.1 % ( 95 % CI 23.9 - 32.4 ) versus 38.4 % ( 30.3 - 46.5 ; HR 0.71 , 95 % CI 0.51 - 0.99 ; p=0.049 ) . Incidence of diabetes was 72.6 % ( 68.4 - 76.8 ) versus 89.9 % ( 84.9 - 94.9 ; HR 0.55 , 95 % CI 0.40 - 0.76 ; p=0.001 ) . INTERPRETATION A 6-year lifestyle intervention programme for Chinese people with impaired glucose tolerance can reduce incidence of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and diabetes . These findings emphasise the long-term clinical benefits of lifestyle intervention for patients with impaired glucose tolerance and provide further justification for adoption of lifestyle interventions as public health measures to control the consequences of diabetes . FUNDING Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , WHO , the China-Japan Friendship Hospital , Da Qing First Hospital
target: Small effect sizes and potentially transient effect were reported in some studies , and some review ers noted that durability of intervention impact was potentially sensitive to duration of intervention and adherence to behaviour change .
  Behaviour change , vascular disease and mortality outcome data were infrequently reported , and evidence of the impact of intervention on these outcomes was minimal .
  Relatively long- duration lifestyle interventions can limit or delay progression to diabetes under trial conditions .
  However , outcomes from more time-limited interventions , and those applied in routine clinical setting s , appear more variable , in keeping with the findings of recent pragmatic trials .
  There is little evidence of intervention impact on vascular outcomes or mortality end points in any context . '
  Real-world ' implementation of lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention may be expected to lead to modest outcomes
background: OBJECTIVES To review the clinical outcomes of combined diet and physical activity interventions for population s at high risk of type 2 diabetes .