The treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee with pulsed electrical stimulation. The effects of electro-acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on patients with painful osteoarthritic knees: a randomized controlled trial with follow-up evaluation. Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improve the physical performance of people with knee osteoarthritis?
The safety and effectiveness of pulsed electrical stimulation was evaluated for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.
                A multicenter, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial that enrolled 78 patients with OA of the knee incorporated 3 primary efficacy variables of patients' pain, patients' function, and physician global evaluation of patients' condition, and 6 secondary variables that included duration of morning stiffness, range of motion, knee tenderness, joint swelling, joint circumference, and walking time. Measurements were recorded at baseline and during the 4 week treatment period.
                Patients treated with the active devices showed significantly greater improvement than the placebo group for all primary efficacy variables in comparisons of mean change from baseline to the end of treatment (p < 0.05). Improvement of > or = 50% from baseline was demonstrated in at least one primary efficacy variable in 50% of the active device group, in 2 variables in 32%, and in all 3 variables in 24%. In the placebo group improvement of > or = 50% occurred in 36% for one, 6% for 2, and 6% for 3 variables. Mean morning stiffness decreased 20 min in the active device group and increased 2 min in the placebo group (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed for tenderness, swelling, or walking time.
                The improvements in clinical measures for pain and function found in this study suggest that pulsed electrical stimulation is effective for treating OA of the knee. Studies for longterm effects are warranted. To examine the relative effectiveness of electro-acupuncture (EA) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in alleviating osteoarthritic (OA)-induced knee pain.
                Single-blinded, randomized controlled study.
                Twenty-four (24) subjects (23 women and 1 man), mean age 85, were recruited from eight subsidized Care & Attention Homes for the elderly.
                Subjects were randomly assigned to the EA, TENS, or control groups. Subjects in the EA group (n = 8) received low-frequency EA (2 Hz) on two acupuncture points (ST-35, Dubi and EX-LE-4, Neixiyan) of the painful knee for 20 minutes. Subjects in the TENS group (n = 8) received low-frequency TENS of 2 Hz and pulse width of 200 micros on the same acupuncture points for 20 minutes. In both treatment groups, electrical treatment was carried out for a total of eight sessions in 2 weeks. Eight subjects received osteoarthritic knee care and education only in a control group. All subjects were evaluated before the first treatment, after the last treatment, and at 2-week follow-up periods.
                After eight sessions of treatment, there was significant reduction of knee pain in both EA group and TENS group, as measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain (p < 0.01). Prolonged analgesic effect was maintained in the EA and the TENS groups at a 2-week follow-up evaluation. The Timed Up-and-Go Test (TUGT) score of the EA group was significantly lower than that of the control group (p < 0.05), but such change was not observed in the TENS group.
                Both EA and TENS treatments were effective in reducing OA-induced knee pain. EA had the additional advantage of enhancing the TUGT results as opposed to TENS treatment or no treatment, which did not produce such corollary effect. : According to a recent metaanalysis study, there is strong evidence to support the view that transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is an effective treatment for managing osteoarthritis (OA) knee pain. However, there is limited evidence showing its effectiveness in improving physical function. This study examined whether TENS alone can improve physical function in terms of range of knee motion and the Timed-Up-and-Go Test.
                : Subjects were randomly allocated into 2 groups receiving TENS at 100 Hz or a placebo TENS. Outcome measures included: 1) visual analog scale for measuring the intensity of the present pain, 2) Timed-Up-and-Go Test, and 3) range of knee motion (ROM). Repeated-measures analysis of variance and Pearson correlation were used for data analyses.
                : By day 10, TENS produced a significantly greater increase in maximum knee ROM than the placebo group (P = 0.033). TENS also significantly increased the pain-limited knee ROM across sessions, but the between-group difference was short of significance (P = 0.067). The decrease in time in performing the Timed-Up-and-Go Test was also not significantly different between the 2 groups. A moderate correlation was observed between the reduction in pain scores and the improvement in the Timed-Up-and-Go Test.
                : Our findings suggested that TENS did improve some of the physical parameters but over 10 days was unable to produce significant improvement in functional performance among people with knee OA. A larger-scale study with the assessment of other functional outcomes may be required to clarify if TENS could improve function in people with knee OA. Also, exercise can be considered to be an important adjunct treatment to TENS to improve function significantly.
Current evidence suggests that electrical stimulation therapy may provide significant improvements for knee OA, but further studies are required to confirm whether the statistically significant results shown in these trials confer to important benefits.