Randomised double-blind comparison of lofexidine and clonidine in the out-patient treatment of opiate withdrawal. Efficacy of clonidine and of methadone in the rapid detoxification of patients dependent on heroin. Opiate detoxification of methadone maintenance patients using lefetamine, clonidine and buprenorphine. Double-blind randomised controlled trial of lofexidine versus clonidine in the treatment of heroin withdrawal. Double-blind study of lofexidine and clonidine in the detoxification of opiate addicts in hospital. Efficacy of clonidine, guanfacine and methadone in the rapid detoxification of heroin addicts: a controlled clinical trial. Clonidine in outpatient detoxification from methadone maintenance. Follow-up after a six-month maintenance period on naltrexone versus placebo in heroin addicts. Accelerated lofexidine treatment regimen compared with conventional lofexidine and methadone treatment for in-patient opiate detoxification. Clonidine as an adjunct therapy to opioids for neonatal abstinence syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. A Phase 3 placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-site trial of the alpha-2-adrenergic agonist, lofexidine, for opioid withdrawal. A randomized controlled trial of buprenorphine in the management of short-term ambulatory heroin withdrawal. Rapid opiate detoxication in outpatient treatment: relationship with naltrexone compliance. Primary care-based ambulatory opioid detoxification: the results of a clinical trial. Randomised double-blind comparison of lofexidine and methadone in the in-patient treatment of opiate withdrawal. Clonidine and opiate receptor antagonists in the treatment of heroin addiction. A controlled comparison of buprenorphine and clonidine for acute detoxification from opioids. A comparison of antagonist-precipitated withdrawal under anesthesia to standard inpatient withdrawal as a precursor to maintenance naltrexone treatment in heroin users: outcomes at 6 and 12 months. Craving and drug reward: a comparison of methadone and clonidine in detoxifying opiate addicts. A comparison of rapid (opioid) detoxification with clonidine-assisted detoxification for heroin-dependent persons.
This study compares the clinical response to lofexidine and clonidine in the out-patient treatment of opiate withdrawal in 50 opiate addicts, using a randomised double-blind study design. Patients were taking 40 mg or less methadone daily, or equivalent amounts of other opiates. Fifty-eight percent of those starting treatment completed detoxification, and were opiate free at 4 weeks: more patients completed withdrawal in the lofexidine group, but the difference was not significant. Clonidine produced more hypotensive effects: more home visits were also required by medical staff. There was no other significant difference in side effects. Both drugs can be used successfully in out-patient detoxification, but lofexidine is more economical in regard to staff time. The efficacy of a rapid detoxification schedule (8 to 10 days) with clonidine or methadone was evaluated in 30 patients addicted to heroin. The dose of study drug was preestablished according to the subject's weight and the amount of opioid consumption, and the total daily dose was reduced by approximately 15% during the study. All subjects completed the detoxification program and stayed in the hospital for at least 12 days. Clonidine and methadone therapies proved to be highly effective. There was a marked reduction in anxiety during opioid detoxification, although subjects' experiences differed according to the drug used. On the day of discharge, subjects who had received methadone still had attenuated withdrawal symptoms, whereas there were no such symptoms in the clonidine group. Muscular aching, flatulence, and daily drowsiness were more common among subjects in the methadone group, while subjects in the clonidine group had more sleep disturbances and weeping. Syncopal episodes and bradycardia occurred more frequently in the clonidine group. Thirty-nine methadone maintenance patients were included in a 9-day, double blind, randomized, inpatient detoxification trial. Methadone was tapered to 10 mg/day and then patients were assigned to one of these 3 protocols: clonidine (0.3-0.9 mg/day), lefetamine (60-240 mg/day), buprenorphine (0.15-0.9 mg/day). Buprenorphine treatment was significantly superior to clonidine and to lefetamine (F = 3.96 df = 2, 29 P < 0.05) in controlling objective, subjective and psychological withdrawal symptomatology. Clonidine was more effective than lefetamine in suppressing withdrawal in the first 3 days of treatment (day 3: F = 4.10 df = 2, 30 P < 0.05), and this trend was apparent on the objective and psychological items. In addition to evaluations of the efficacy of the single drugs used, the study showed that tapering methadone to low doses before entering the pharmacologically assisted discontinuation phase was clinically acceptable in detoxification from long-term methadone treatment. Lofexidine is an analogue of clonidine, an agonist at the alpha 2 noradrenergic receptor. Reports from preliminary open studies have suggested that it may be at least as effective as clonidine in the management of opiate withdrawal, and without the same limitation of postural hypotension. We report on a randomised double-blind comparison of lofexidine versus clonidine in the treatment of heroin withdrawal. A total of 80 hospitalized heroin addicts were randomly assigned to treatment with lofexidine or clonidine during in-patient opiate withdrawal. Maximum daily doses were 1.6 mg for lofexidine and 0.6 mg for clonidine. There was marked diurnal variation of withdrawal symptoms with severity being greatest at the daytime reading at 16.00 h and being markedly less at the night-time reading (recorded at 08.00 h). Lofexidine and clonidine were equally effective in treating the withdrawal syndrome. However, significantly more problems relating to hypotension were encountered with subjects on clonidine, with twice as many instances of withholding medication due to hypotension in the clonidine group. Better treatment retention rates were seen in the lofexidine group, although no difference was found in the proportion who had reached minimal symptom severity by the time of their discharge. We conclude that lofexidine and clonidine are equally effective, but with significantly fewer hypotensive problems with lofexidine. Further benefit from lofexidine may be possible with revised dosing regimens. Outpatient studies of lofexidine are now indicated. Twenty eight opiate addicted inpatients who had been stabilised on methadone took part in a double-blind randomised trial of clonidine and lofexidine (14 on each treatment) for opiate detoxification: clonidine or lofexidine dosage was titrated according to symptoms. The course of withdrawal symptoms was very similar with both treatments, representing an appreciable suppression of symptoms when compared with experiences of sudden methadone withdrawal, but lofexidine resulted in significantly less hypotension and adverse events. These results suggest that lofexidine is a valuable drug for opiate detoxification and may be more acceptable to patients wishing to withdraw from opiates. The efficacy of clonidine, methadone, and guanfacine in rapid detoxification of heroin inpatients was assessed in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Signs and symptoms of abstinence and of side effects were analysed in 90 heroin addicts successfully completing a 12-day inpatient trial. All patients fit DSM-III criteria for opioid dependence, the age range being 18 to 36 years. All three drugs were effective in controlling abstinence; however, the course of abstinence was different in the methadone group as compared to the adrenergic agonists, the latter showing limitations in their ability to suppress withdrawal manifestations. While mean number of withdrawal signs and symptoms was significantly lower during days 2 to 5 in the methadone group (p less than 0.01), adrenergic agonists were slightly more effective at the end of the trial. Incidence of side effects was closely related to the dose administered. Hypotensive action of adrenergic agonists was more marked in orthostatic position. The present results suggest that methadone is superior to adrenergic agonists. Between these drugs clonidine appears to be less effective than guanfacine in controlling some withdrawal manifestations, and causes more side effects, mainly of cardiovascular nature. Inpatient narcotic detoxification with clonidine hydrochloride has been used since 1978. Outpatient withdrawal, potentially more useful, has not been adequately studied. This report describes a double-blind random assignment of 49 methadone hydrochloride-maintained patients whose dose had been lowered to 20 mg. Twenty-five were detoxified using methadone at 1-mg decrements, 24 by abrupt substitution with clonidine. Approximately 40% of both groups achieved successful detoxification, with one third maintaining abstinence over the subsequent six months. The groups were also largely equivalent on withdrawal symptoms, but the clonidine group experienced symptoms in the first half of the study and the methadone group in the second half. Clonidine appears to be a safe and efficacious outpatient treatment for opiate withdrawal, although the results were less favorable than those obtained in open or inpatient studies. Naltrexone and placebo as adjuvant treatment of opioid dependence were compared in a double-blind, controlled clinical trial in 50 heroin addicts. The overall efficacy was assessed by the degree of treatment acceptance, percentage of relapse in heroin consumption, presence of side effects, and overall retention on naltrexone. A total of 50 patients of both sexes, aged from 18 to 30 years, who fulfilled DSM-III-R criteria for opioid dependence were included in the study. All patients completed detoxification with clonidine on an inpatient basis for 2 weeks and subsequently, on an out-patient basis, received oral naltrexone (350 mg per week) for a month. At the beginning of the second month patients were randomly allocated to treatment with naltrexone (28 patients) or placebo (22 patients) until a 6-month treatment period in a double-blind fashion had been completed. During the study period (1 year) all patients followed the same therapeutic schedule. Patients in both groups were comparable in terms of socio-demographic data and toxicological history. The efficacy of naltrexone was not superior to that of placebo as there were no significant differences in acceptance of treatment, retention rates, opioid and other drug consumption, drug compliance or side effects. This open study compares an accelerated 5-day lofexidine regimen with orthodox 10-day lofexidine and methadone regimens in the treatment of opiate withdrawal in 61 polysubstance abusing opiate addicts. Significant differences in levels of withdrawal symptoms were found on days 11, 13-15 and 17-20, symptoms resolving most rapidly in the 5-day lofexidine treatment group, whilst withdrawal responses in the 10-day lofexidine treatment group were intermediate between the 5-day lofexidine and standard methadone treatment conditions. When the two lofexidine regimens were separately compared with methadone the 5-day lofexidine treatment was significantly more effective on day 10, 11 and 13-20, whilst the 10-day lofexidine treatment was not significantly different from methadone. There were no significant differences in rates of completion of detoxification between the three treatments. Both the lofexidine treatment regimens had a similar effect on blood pressure. Five patients experienced side effects which resolved with dose reduction, all remaining in the study. An accelerated 5-day lofexidine regimen may attenuate opiate withdrawal symptoms more rapidly than conventional 10-day lofexidine or methadone treatment schedules without exacerbating hypotensive side effects. To determine if oral clonidine would reduce the duration of opioid detoxification for neonatal abstinence syndrome.
                Infants with intrauterine exposure to methadone or heroin and neonatal abstinence syndrome (2 consecutive modified Finnegan scores of > or =9) were enrolled at 2 hospitals during 2002-2005 and followed until final hospital discharge. All enrolled infants (80) received oral diluted tincture of opium according to a standardized algorithm and were randomly assigned to receive oral clonidine (1 microg/kg every 4 hours) (40 infants) or placebo (40 infants). Primary outcome was duration of opioid therapy. Secondary outcomes included the amount of opium required to control symptoms, number of treatment failures, and differences in blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation.
                The median length of therapy was 27% shorter in the clonidine group (11 [95% confidence interval: 8-15 days]) than in the placebo group (15 days [95% confidence interval: 12-17 days]). In the clonidine group, 7 infants required restarting opium after initial discontinuation versus none in the placebo group, with the total length of treatment/observation remaining significantly less in the clonidine group. Higher dosages of opium were required by 40% of the infants in the placebo group versus 20% in the clonidine group. Treatment failures occurred in 12.5% of the infants in the placebo group versus none in the clonidine group. Hypertension, hypotension, bradycardia, or desaturations did not occur in either group. Three infants in the clonidine group died as a result of myocarditis, sudden infant death syndrome, and homicide, all after hospital discharge and before 6 months of age.
                In this randomized, double-blind trial, adding clonidine to standard opioid therapy for detoxification from in utero exposure to methadone or heroin reduced the duration of pharmacotherapy for neonatal abstinence without causing short-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes. A larger trial is indicated to determine long-term safety. Lofexidine is an alpha-2-adrenergic receptor agonist that is approved in the United Kingdom for the treatment of opioid withdrawal symptoms. Lofexidine has been reported to have more significant effects on decreasing opioid withdrawal symptoms with less hypotension than clonidine.
                To demonstrate that lofexidine is well tolerated and effective in the alleviation of observationally defined opioid withdrawal symptoms in opioid dependent individuals undergoing medically supervised opioid detoxification as compared to placebo.
                An inpatient, Phase 3, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized multi-site trial with three phases: (1) opioid agonist stabilization phase (days 1-3), (2) detoxification/medication or placebo phase (days 4-8), and (3) post detoxification/medication phase (days 9-11).
                Sixty-eight opioid dependent subjects were enrolled at three sites with 35 randomized to lofexidine and 33 to placebo.
                Modified Himmelsbach Opiate Withdrawal Scale (MHOWS) on study day 5 (second opioid detoxification treatment day).
                Due to significant findings, the study was terminated early. On the study day 5 MHOWS, subjects treated with lofexidine had significantly lower scores (equating to fewer/less severe withdrawal symptoms) than placebo subjects (least squares means 19.5+/-2.1 versus 30.9+/-2.7; p=0.0019). Lofexidine subjects had significantly better retention in treatment than placebo subjects (38.2% versus 15.2%; Log rank test p=0.01).
                Lofexidine is well tolerated and more efficacious than placebo for reducing opioid withdrawal symptoms in inpatients undergoing medically supervised opioid detoxification. To determine whether buprenorphine is more effective than clonidine and other symptomatic medications in managing ambulatory heroin withdrawal.
                Open label, prospective randomized controlled trial examining withdrawal and 4-week postwithdrawal outcomes on intention-to-treat.
                Two specialist, out-patient drug treatment centres in inner city Melbourne and Sydney, Australia.
                One hundred and fourteen dependent heroin users were recruited. Participants were 18 years or over, and with no significant other drug dependence, medical or psychiatric conditions or recent methadone treatment. One hundred and one (89%) participants completed a day 8 research interview examining withdrawal outcomes, and 92 (81%) completed day 35 research interview examining postwithdrawal outcomes.
                Participants randomized to control (n = 56) (up to 8 days of clonidine and other symptomatic medications) or experimental (n = 58) (up to 5 days of buprenorphine) withdrawal groups. Following the 8-day withdrawal episode, participants could self-select from range of postwithdrawal options (naltrexone, substitution maintenance, or counselling).
                Retention in withdrawal; heroin use during withdrawal; and retention in drug treatment 4 weeks after withdrawal.
                Withdrawal severity; adverse events, and heroin use in the postwithdrawal period.
                The experimental group had better treatment retention at day 8 (86% versus 57%, P = 0.001, 95% CI for numbers needed to treat (NNT) = 3-8) and day 35 (62% versus 39%, P = 0.02, 95% CI for NNT = 4-18); used heroin on fewer days during the withdrawal programme (2.6 +/- 2.5 versus 4.5 +/- 2.3, P < 0.001, 95% CI = 1-2.5 days) and in the postwithdrawal period (9.0 +/- 8.2 versus 14.6 +/- 10, P < 0.01, 95% CI = 1.8-9.4); and reported less withdrawal severity. No severe adverse events reported.
                Buprenorphine is effective for short-term ambulatory heroin withdrawal, with greater retention, less heroin use and less withdrawal discomfort during withdrawal; and increased postwithdrawal treatment retention than symptomatic medications. A variety of detoxification methods have been utilized for the treatment of heroin withdrawal before individuals begin long-term opiate-free and naltrexone programs. While methadone in decreasing doses is still widely used for detoxication procedures, rapid and ultrarapid protocols including clonidine and opiate receptors antagonists have been proposed. This study compares the efficacy of different detoxification methods and investigates possible changes in naltrexone compliance. Ninety-eight heroin-addicted individuals were studied to evaluate withdrawal symptoms, craving, mood, urine toxicologic screens, and drop-out rate during therapy with: Group A: clonidine only (5 days); Group B: clonidine, oxazepam, baclofen, and ketoprofene with naloxone and naltrexone (2 days); and Group C: methadone in decreasing doses (10 days). Naltrexone compliance and relapse rates were evaluated during a 6-month follow-up period. Rapid detoxification with opiate antagonists (Group B) induced slight and transient withdrawal symptoms, and resulted in a significantly lower percentage of heroin catabolites in urine controls during the detoxification procedure, lower negative and positive craving, less mood problems, and higher compliance in extended naltrexone treatment. In comparison with clonidine only (Group A) and methadone (Group C), the early use of naltrexone during detoxification in combination with benzodiazepines and clonidine facilitated extended naltrexone acceptance and improved the recovery outcome in outpatients. To determine the feasibility of primary care-based ambulatory opioid detoxification (AOD) using two protocols: clonidine and clonidine plus naltrexone.
                The Central Medical Unit (CMU)--a freestanding primary care medical clinic staffed by physicians and nurse practitioners.
                Injection drug users (IDUs) seeking substance abuse treatment between the ages of 18 and 50 years who were addicted to opioids (e.g., heroin) and not currently in drug treatment.
                In the clonidine protocol, clonidine was administered every 4 hours "as needed" for up to 12 days. In the clonidine plus naltrexone protocol, clonidine was administered and naltrexone was administered in increasing doses over five days. Both protocols included "adjuvant" medications for muscle cramps, insomnia, and vomiting. Successfully detoxified patients were referred to ongoing drug treatment.
                A prospective nonrandomized clinical trial.
                One hundred forty opioid-addicted IDUs were referred to the medical clinic for AOD. Among the 125 patients who enrolled in the study, 57 selected clonidine and 68 selected clonidine/naltrexone. The treatment groups (clonidine vs clonidine/naltrexone) were similar at baseline with respect to: age at first heroin use (21 years vs 23 years), mean admission opioid craving score (45/100 vs 49/100), and withdrawal symptom score (19/72 vs 18/72). Overall, 70% (88/125) of the AODs were successful, including 42% (24/57) for clonidine and 94% (64/68) for clonidine/naltrexone (p < 0.001).
                This study suggests that primary care-based AOD can be safely and effectively carried out by primary care providers and that clonidine/naltrexone may be more effective in this setting than is clonidine alone. Ambulatory opioid detoxification can give internists a larger role in initiating drug treatment for IDUs who are addicted to opioids. This study compares the clinical responses to methadone and lofexidine in the treatment of opiate withdrawal in 86 polydrug-abusing opiate addicts, using a randomised double-blind study design. The lofexidine treatment more severe symptoms from day 3 to 7 and again on day 10 (the last day of treatment), but thereafter both groups showed a similar progressive symptom decline. There was no significant difference in rates of treatment completion. Both treatments had similar effects on blood pressure. Lofexidine is broadly clinically equivalent to methadone, and appears to be a non-opiate treatment of opiate withdrawal without serious limiting hypotensive side effects. Good results in detoxification methods have been reached using both together clonidine and opiate receptors antagonists. One hundred fifty-two heroin-abusing patients were studied evaluating withdrawal symptoms after therapy with (a) clonidine only, (b) clonidine and naltrexone, (c) clonidine and naloxone, and (d) placebos. Treatment results, emotional and behavioral changes, and involvement in psychosocial programs were evaluated after a 6-month follow-up. Although opiate antagonists were able to induce slight and transient withdrawal signs and symptoms, there was, in the group of patients treated with clonidine and naltrexone together, a low percentage of catabolites in urine and an improvement in mood and family relationships. Furthermore, the patients that underwent longer naltrexone treatment showed a stronger involvement in psychosocial programs, and even their relatives demonstrated more interest in the recovery program. A decrease in the difficulties of accepting an opiate antagonists treatment and a different evaluation of withdrawal syndrome were the results of an early use of naltrexone. We compared the short-term efficacy of a high-dose, 3 day regimen of buprenorphine to a standard 5-day course of clonidine in attenuating the signs and symptoms of the acute opioid abstinence syndrome during rapid detoxification from heroin in 25 men and women admitted to a closed inpatient research ward for this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Among the 18 completers, there were no significant differences between the buprenorphine and clonidine groups on five subjective and six physiological measures. However, clonidine lowered blood pressure and buprenorphine provided more effective early relief of withdrawal symptoms. To compare two methods of heroin withdrawal, 51 heroin users were randomised to undergo a 1 day precipitated withdrawal procedure using naloxone under anaesthetic. About 50 participants were randomised to receive the current standard inpatient withdrawal treatment using clonidine plus symptomatic medication. Following withdrawal, both groups were offered 9 months of naltrexone treatment and supportive counselling. Outcome measures were: commencement of naltrexone, retention in treatment and heroin use at 6 and 12 months. Significantly more of the precipitated withdrawal group completed withdrawal, commenced naltrexone and stayed in treatment for the first 3 months. Overall, there was a significant reduction in both self-reported heroin use and morphine concentration in hair over the 12 month study period, with participants in the precipitated withdrawal group showing significantly lower morphine concentration at 6 months. Being younger and having a lower level of dependence were predictors of abstinence at 6 and 12 months. The advantage of precipitated withdrawal under anesthesia did not persist beyond 3 months with respect to retention in naltrexone treatment or beyond 6 months with respect to heroin use. Long-term follow-up is crucial in assessing the effects of treatment interventions for heroin dependence. Based upon findings relating to the reinstatement of responding from the animal laboratory, the present study investigated whether methadone, a synthetic opiate, would prime the desire to use heroin for its pleasant effect (i.e. for positive reinforcement) compared to clonidine, a non-opiate drug, in detoxifying opiate addicts (n = 16). In-patient opiate addicts were tested at maximum withdrawal and minimal withdrawal, and self-reported desire to use heroin (i) for its pleasant effect (positive craving) and (ii) to alleviate an unpleasant feeling or mood (negative craving) was recorded before drug administration, immediately after drug administration and on 4 further occasions, 15 min apart. In addition, self-reported rating of opiate withdrawal symptoms were also recorded. Although elevated in the methadone group, the difference between methadone and clonidine groups in positive craving did not reach statistical significance. Interpretation of the data is complicated by elevated baselines of positive craving in the methadone group at minimum withdrawal. Measures of negative craving and self-reported withdrawal symptoms showed a similar pattern of decline, and were significantly correlated at maximum withdrawal, thereby providing evidence from substance misusers themselves that the constructs of positive and negative reinforcement can be differentiated. This study compares two methods of detoxification available to heroin users in Western Australia: clonidine-assisted detoxification (CD) or clonidine-naloxone precipitated withdrawal under sedation (rapid opioid detoxification [ROD]). Oral naltrexone was made available to all participants following detoxification. Eighty heroin-dependent persons were randomly assigned to either ROD or CD. Most undertaking ROD commenced and completed this treatment. Less than one-third undertaking CD completed this treatment. There was no significant difference in those treated by CD or ROD in subjective assessment of degree or duration of pain, severity of withdrawal and craving, nor was there an increase in the withdrawal sequelae after treatment. Induction of oral naltrexone following ROD was greater, but oral naltrexone compliance levels and abstinence from heroin four weeks following detoxification were similar between ROD and CD groups. The level of patient satisfaction between the two treatments was also similar. The authors discuss why ROD is considered more effective than CD.
Clonidine and lofexidine are more effective than placebo for the management of withdrawal from heroin or methadone. No significant difference in efficacy was detected for treatment regimes based on clonidine or lofexidine, and those based on reducing doses of methadone over a period of around 10 days but methadone is associated with fewer adverse effects than clonidine, and lofexidine has a better safety profile than clonidine.