Lactate compared with pH analysis at fetal scalp blood sampling: a prospective randomised study. Determination of pH or lactate in fetal scalp blood in management of intrapartum fetal distress: randomised controlled multicentre trial.
Fetal scalp blood sampling is a widely used method for assessing fetal condition in the event of ominous fetal heart rate patterns. The purpose of this randomised trial was to compare the value of fetal scalp blood lactate and pH management in cases of abnormal intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings.
                Of 341 cases of ominous fetal heart rate patterns, 169 were randomly assigned to pH analysis, and 172 to lactate measurements. Lactate was measured using a lactate card requiring 5 microL of blood and yielding the result within 60 seconds. pH analysis was performed with an ABL 510 acid-base analyser requiring 35 microL of blood and yielding the results within 47 seconds.
                Unsuccessful fetal blood sampling procedures (no result or an unreliable result) occurred significantly more often in the pH subgroup than in the lactate subgroup (OR 16.1 with 95% CI 5.8-44.7). In the pH subgroup the failure rate was inversely related to the degree of cervical dilatation. Compared with the pH subgroup, the lactate subgroup was characterised by fewer fetal scalp incisions per blood sampling attempt (median 1.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 1-1] vs 2.0 [IQR 1-2]), and significantly less time required for the sampling procedure (median 120 s [IQR 90-147] vs 230 s [IQR 180-300]). The groups did not differ in mode of delivery, neonatal outcome and umbilical artery acid-base balance and lactate levels.
                This trial showed the levels of lactate and pH in fetal scalp blood to be comparable in predicting perinatal outcome, but the procedure to measuring lactate was more successful than that for pH. Owing to its simplicity of performance, lactate analysis is an attractive alternative for intrapartum fetal monitoring. To examine the effectiveness of pH analysis of fetal scalp blood compared with lactate analysis in identifying hypoxia in labour to prevent acidaemia at birth.
                Randomised controlled multicentre trial.
                Labour wards.
                Women with a singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation, gestational age >or=34 weeks, and clinical indication for fetal scalp blood sampling.
                Standard pH analysis (n=1496) or lactate analysis (n=1496) with an electrochemical microvolume (5 mul) test strip device. The cut-off levels for intervention were pH <7.21 and lactate >4.8 mmol/l, respectively.
                Metabolic acidaemia (pH <7.05 and base deficit >12 mmol/l) or pH <7.00 in cord artery blood.
                Metabolic acidaemia occurred in 3.2% in the lactate group and in 3.6% in the pH group (relative risk 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 1.36). pH <7.00 occurred in 1.5% in the lactate group and in 1.8% in the pH group (0.84, 0.47 to 1.50). There was no significant difference in Apgar scores <7 at 5 minutes (1.15, 0.76 to 1.75) or operative deliveries for fetal distress (1.02, 0.93 to 1.11).
                There were no significant differences in rate of acidaemia at birth after use of lactate analysis or pH analysis of fetal scalp blood samples to determine hypoxia during labour.
                ISRCT No 1606064.
When further testing to assess fetal well-being in labour is indicated, fetal scalp blood lactate estimation is more likely to be successfully undertaken than pH estimation. Action cut-off lactate values need to consider the lactate meter used. Further studies may consider sub-group analysis by gestational age, the stage of labour and sampling within a prolonged second stage of labour. Additionally, future studies may address longer-term neonatal outcomes, maternal satisfaction with intrapartum fetal monitoring and an economic analysis.