Comparison of oral controlled-release morphine with transdermal fentanyl in terminal cancer pain. A placebo-controlled randomized crossover trial of the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor antagonist, memantine, in patients with chronic phantom limb pain. Efficacy of the NMDA-receptor antagonist memantine in patients with chronic phantom limb pain--results of a randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Intravenous infusion of the NMDA antagonist, ketamine, in chronic posttraumatic pain with allodynia: a double-blind comparison to alfentanil and placebo. Analgesic efficacy and safety of single-dose intramuscular ketorolac for postoperative pain management in children following tonsillectomy. Comparative efficacy of patient-controlled administration of morphine, hydromorphone, or sufentanil for the treatment of oral mucositis pain following bone marrow transplantation. Comparison of TTS-fentanyl with sustained-release oral morphine in the treatment of patients not using opioids for mild-to-moderate pain. Long-term intraspinal infusions of opioids in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of epidural ketamine combined with morphine for postoperative analgesia after major upper abdominal surgery. Opioids versus antidepressants in postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Perioperative small-dose S(+)-ketamine has no incremental beneficial effects on postoperative pain when standard-practice opioid infusions are used. Evaluation of long-term efficacy and safety of transdermal fentanyl in the treatment of chronic noncancer pain. 'Balanced analgesia' in the perioperative period: is there a place for ketamine?
Controlled-release morphine (MST) given twice daily provides a simpler and more convenient treatment regimen than 4-hourly opioid administration for the control of cancer pain. Recently, a new formulation of transdermal fentanyl (TDF) has been developed which provides a new route for the treatment of cancer pain. The present study was designed to compare the analgesic efficacy, safety and adverse effects of MST and TDF in the management of chronic cancer pain.
                In this open, comparative and randomized study, patients were treated with oral morphine hydrochloride immediate-release (MHIR) in the stabilization phase and then the prescription was switched to MST or TDF for 14 days in the treatment phase. Oral MHIR was provided as rescue medication for breakthrough pain. Assessments of the pain intensity, pain frequency, degree of pain improvement, profile of mood states, quality of sleep, activity status and adverse effects were performed before and after the stabilization phase and before and after the treatment phase.
                Forty of 47 cancer patients completed the study with 20 patients in each group. There were significant (p < 0.05) improvements in pain intensity, pain frequency, mood states and quality of sleep in both groups before and after treatment, while improvement in the activity status was not significant. No specific adverse effects were encountered except for drowsiness which occurred in 6 patients treated with MST and 5 treated with TDF (p < 0.05). Insomnia was significantly improved (p < 0.05) with both regimens compared with that in the period before treatment. There were no significant differences between the two study groups in analgesic efficacy or adverse effects.
                These results suggest that TDF and MSt are safe and effective analgesics for the management of chronic cancer pain. However, TDF provides a simpler and more convenient treatment for those patients with severe nausea, vomiting or dysphagia. In the present study we investigated the effect of the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist memantine (30 mg/d) on the intensity of chronic phantom limb pain (PLP) and cortical reorganization. In 8 patients with chronic PLP, memantine was tested in a placebo-controlled double-blinded crossover trial of 4 wk duration per trial. The intensity of PLP was rated hourly by the patients on a visual analog scale during baseline and both treatment periods. At the same time points, the functional organization of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) was determined by neuromagnetic source imaging. In comparison to baseline and placebo, the NMDA receptor antagonist had no effect on the intensity of chronic PLP. In none of the periods were significant changes in the functional organization of SI observed. Although the conclusions regarding the clinical effect are limited because of the small sample size, the data indicate that in the studied dosage the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine is ineffective in the treatment of chronic PLP and is also ineffective for the reduction of associated neural plasticity in the primary SI.
                NMDA receptors play a substantial role in central nervous system changes underlying neuropathic pain. In a placebo-controlled double-blinded study we tested the effect of 30 mg memantine on chronic phantom limb pain and pain-associated cortical reorganization. Phantom limb pain (PLP) associated neuroplastic changes are partly mediated by excitatory amino acids at NMDA receptor sites. This study was undertaken to deduce if NMDA-receptor antagonists may be effective in patients with chronic PLP. Therefore a four week double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of 30 mg memantine/day, an orally administrable NMDA receptor antagonist.Thirty-six patients, 18 per group, with a history of at least 12 months PLP and an average pain of at least 4 on the 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) were enrolled. The patients completed a standardized questionnaire before the trial. PLP intensity and the level of eight complaints were assessed during the trial. Number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated based on the average PLP during the 3rd week (steady state). In both groups, PLP declined significantly in comparison with the baseline (verum: 5.1 (+/-2.1) to 3,8 (+/-2,3), placebo from 5.1 (+/-2.0) to 3.2 (+/-1,46) NRS) without a re-rising of the PLP during the washout period. Mean pain relief was 47% in the memantine group (10 patients reported more than 50% relief), 40% in the placebo group (6>50%): NNT were 4.5 (KI: 2.1-10.6). Analysis of covariance demonstrated a significant impact only on the prior PLP intensity, but no treatment effect. Two patients have demonstrated long-term pain relief under memantine until now (16 months). The total number of slight adverse events were comparable in both groups, but the overall number of severe events was higher in the memantine group (P<0.05). This trial failed to demonstrate a significant clinical benefit of the NMDA-receptor antagonist memantine in chronic PLP. The administration of a higher dosage is probably not tolerable. NMDA antagonists and opioids relieve experimentally produced hyperalgesia in animals and humans, presumably by attenuating a heightened central nervous system response to afferent input. A few small studies in patients have suggested that intravenous boluses or rapid infusions of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist ketamine relieve some neuropathic pains but also produce disturbances of cognition and mood. In a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, we treated eight patients with chronic posttraumatic pain and widespread mechanical allodynia with 2-h intravenous infusions of the NMDA antagonist ketamine (mean dose, 58 mg), the opioid mu-receptor agonist alfentanil (mean dose, 11 mg), and placebo. The patients were selected because extensive sensory testing suggested that altered central processing contributed to their symptoms. The slow rate of drug infusion was chosen to see if pain relief would precede dose-limiting side effects. Means of the peak effect scores achieved during the 2-h infusion were for pain relief: ketamine, 65%, alfentanil, 46%, and placebo, 22% (p < 0.01 for ketamine and p = 0.08 for alfentanil, each compared to placebo); and for relief of allodynia: ketamine, 71%, alfentanil, 57%, and placebo, 21% (p < 0.01 for both ketamine and alfentanil). Appreciable symptomatic relief developed only after the onset of unpleasant drug side effects. After the infusion was stopped, pain relief disappeared before the side effects resolved. We conclude that NMDA antagonists may have promise for the treatment of neuropathic pain, but strategies are needed to improve their therapeutic ratio, such as intrathecal administration or systemic treatment with more selective drugs. The efficacy of ketorolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, in the management of moderate to severe pain in adults, has led us to conduct a trial of this analgesic in children following tonsillectomy. Children were randomized to receive intramuscular (i.m.) ketorolac (1 mg/kg, EXP group, n = 45) or saline (CTL group, n = 42) at the completion of surgery. Intravenous (i.v.) fentanyl (0.5 micrograms/kg/dose) was administered in repeated doses postoperatively. Pain intensity was measured using both the Oucher and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) to allow for comparison between self-report and behavioral measures of pain intensity. Severity of postoperative bleeding was measured using a 4-point rating scale. The EXP group had a significant reduction in total fentanyl dose (mean: 35.9 micrograms) compared to the CTL group (mean: 48.3 micrograms, t = -2.21, P < 0.03). There was a statistically significant decrease in pre-fentanyl CHEOPS scores in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) in the ketorolac group (F (2, 30) = 5.34, P < 0.01), but not in the saline group (F (2.24) = 2.46, P > 0.05). In the first hour postoperatively, the CHEOPS demonstrated significant decreases in pain intensity scores in response to opioids, in both groups. In the PACU, children were unable to provide a self-report of pain intensity potentially due to a variety of factors (e.g., emergence delirium, agitation, excitement, sedation, and/or pain). However, during the remainder of the postoperative stay, the photographic scale of the Oucher was a more valid measure of pain intensity than the CHEOPS.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) A total of 119 bone marrow transplant patients suffering from oral mucositis pain were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial comparing the efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, hydromorphone and sufentanil. Patient ratings of pain and side-effects on visual analog scales were gathered daily from the start of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) therapy until the discontinuation of opioid treatment either because of resolution of oral mucositis pain, intolerable side-effects, inadequate pain control, or complications related to transplantation. Of the 119 enrolled subjects, 100 met the evaluable criteria of developing oral mucositis and remaining on the study for at least 2 days. Multivariate analysis of the outcome measures indicated that the analgesia achieved in all three opioid groups was nearly equivalent, while measures of side-effects, especially for the combination of sedation, sleep and mood disturbances, were statistically lower in the morphine group than in hydromorphone or sufentanil groups. Patients in the hydromorphone group exhibited the most variability in pain control. Event analysis also indicated significant differences in time to treatment failure between the three groups, with the morphine arm exhibiting clear superiority. The proportion of patients discontinued because of inadequate pain relief was much higher in the sufentanil group (7/36) as compared to the hydromorphone (0/34) or the morphine group (1/30). The daily opioid consumption pattern showed a continual dose escalation during the first week of therapy for all groups, coincident with worsening mucositis. Morphine consumption reached a plateau by day 5, whereas hydromorphone and sufentanil consumption continued to rise until days 7 and 9, respectively. Sufentanil dose requirement increased by approximately 10-fold compared to morphine and hydromorphone, whose requirements increased only 5-fold, suggesting the possibility of development of acute pharmacological tolerance in some patients with this phenylpiperidine opioid. This study provides support for the recommendation that morphine is the opioid of first choice when patient-controlled analgesia is employed for the treatment of severe oropharyngeal pain in bone marrow transplantation (BMT) patients. This randomised, multicentre, direct open comparative trial evaluated the efficacy, treatment convenience, tolerability and safety aspects of transdermal therapeutic system (TTS)-fentanyl and sustained-release oral morphine (SRM) in both opioid-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain and in patients who had already been using opioids for mild-to-moderate pain. The two treatment groups were run in parallel. Special attention was paid to constipation, nausea/vomiting, drowsiness and respiratory depression.
                The 131 enrolled patients started the 4-week treatment at low doses of opioid (25 microg/h TTS-fentanyl for 3 days or 30 mg SRM every 12 h) and were individually titrated. Tolerability, efficacy and safety were assessed throughout the study period. Frequency of constipation was the primary study variable and accordingly the study was powered for this. Both patients and investigators made a global treatment evaluation.
                TTS-fentanyl and SRM were shown to be equally effective. Pain control and sleep quality improved with both treatments. None of the patients developed respiratory depression. Statistically significantly more patients in the SRM treatment group discontinued the trial prematurely (59% vs 27%; p < 0.001), particularly due to adverse events (36% vs 4%; p < 0.001). Fewer patients in the TTS-fentanyl than in the SRM treatment group reported constipation during the trial. This finding was statistically significant after 1 week of treatment (27% vs 57%; p = 0.003). The favourable tolerability profile of TTS-fentanyl was also reflected in both the patient and the investigator global evaluation of the treatment. Patient assessment favoured TTS-fentanyl treatment in terms of a significantly lower rate of troublesome side-effects ('quite a bit' to 'very much' troublesome side-effects in 14% vs 36% of patients; p = 0.003) and less interruption of daily activities (absence of any interruption of daily activities in 88% vs 63% of patients; p = 0.012). Investigators scored TTS-fentanyl as significantly better with respect to 'side-effects' (p = 0.039) and 'overall impression' (p = 0.013). Sub-analyses of opioid-naïve users gave similar results.
                These data indicate that TTS-fentanyl, when used as an opioid of first choice in the treatment of cancer-related pain, is as effective as, but better tolerated than, SRM, including in opioid-naïve patients. Long-term intraspinal infusions of opioid drugs are being increasingly utilized in patients with noncancer pain. Despite this, there is a lack of long-term information, including success and failure rates for pain relief and technical problems. During a 5-year period, 18 noncancer patients underwent implantation of programmable infusion pumps for long-term intrathecal opioid infusion. Patients had (a) neuropathic pain, (b) had failed or been ineligible for noninvasive treatments, and (c) obtained greater than 50% pain relief with intrathecal trial infusions of morphine sulfate or sufentanil citrate. A disinterested third-party reviewer evaluated patients at the most recent follow-up. Sixty-one percent (11/18) of patients had good or fair pain relief with mean follow-up 2.4 +/- 0.3 years (0.8-4.7 years). Average numeric pain scores decreased by 39% +/- 4.3%. Five of the 11 responders required lower opioid doses (12-24 mg/day morphine) and the remaining six patients required higher opioid doses (> 34 mg/day morphine). Failure of long-term pain relief occurred in 39% (7/18) despite good pain relief in trial infusions and the use of both morphine and sufentanil. Technical problems developed in 6/18 patients but appeared to be preventable with further experience. Long-term intrathecal opioid infusions can be effective in treatment of neuropathic pain but might require higher infusion doses. To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of epidural ketamine and morphine compared with epidural morphine alone for postoperative pain relief following major upper abdominal surgery.
                Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.
                Tertiary care referral and teaching hospital.
                46 ASA physical status I and II patients who underwent major upper abdominal procedures.
                Patients were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups: patients in Group 1 received epidural morphine 50 microg/kg whereas patients in Group 2 received epidural ketamine 1 mg/kg combined with 50 microg/kg of morphine postoperatively.
                A blinded observer using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain assessment followed up patients for 48 hours postoperatively. Top-up dose of epidural morphine was provided when VAS was higher than 4. Analgesic requirements and side effects were compared between the two groups.
                Only 40 patients completed the study. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age, gender, weight, duration, or type of surgical procedure or intraoperative opioid requirements. Onset of analgesia was faster (p < 0.001) in Group 2 (11 min) than in Group 1 patients (25 min). The time for first requirement of analgesia was significantly (p < 0.01) longer (19.8 +/- 9.8 hours) in Group 2 patients than Group 1 (12.8 +/- 6.2 hours). Total number of supplemental doses of epidural morphine required in the first 48 hours postoperatively was also significantly less (p < 0.005) in Group 2 compared to Group 1. Patients in Group 2 had higher sedation scores than Group I patients for the first 2 hours postoperatively. None of the patients in either group developed hallucinations or respiratory depression. Other side effects such as pruritus, nausea, and vomiting were also similar in both groups.
                The addition of epidural ketamine 1 mg/kg to morphine 50 microg/kg improved analgesia after major upper abdominal surgery without increasing side effects. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) provide less than satisfactory pain relief for postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), and the role of opioids is controversial.
                To compare the analgesic and cognitive effects of opioids with those of TCA and placebo in the treatment of PHN.
                Seventy-six patients with PHN were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Each subject was scheduled to undergo three treatment periods (opioid, TCA, and placebo), approximately 8 weeks' duration each. Doses were titrated to maximal relief or intolerable side effects. The primary outcome measures were pain intensity (0 to 10 scale), pain relief (0 to 100%), and cognitive function. Analyses included patients who provided any pain ratings after having received at least a single dose of a study medication.
                Fifty patients completed two periods, and 44 patients completed all three. Mean daily maintenance doses were morphine 91 mg or methadone 15 mg and nortriptyline 89 mg or desipramine 63 mg. Opioids and TCA reduced pain (1.9 and 1.4) more than placebo (0.2; p < 0.001), with no appreciable effect on any cognitive measure. The trend favoring opioids over TCA fell short of significance (p = 0.06), and reduction in pain with opioids did not correlate with that following TCA. Treatment with opioids and TCA resulted in greater pain relief (38 and 32%) compared with placebo (11%; p < 0.001). More patients completing all three treatments preferred opioids (54%) than TCA (30%; p = 0.02).
                Opioids effectively treat PHN without impairing cognition. Opioids and TCA act via independent mechanisms and with varied individual effect. Several studies report that when small-dose racemic ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, is administered perioperatively, opioid consumption is reduced postoperatively. S(+)-ketamine has a higher affinity for the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor and less-serious side effects than racemic ketamine. Thirty patients scheduled for elective arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded clinical trial designed to determine the preemptive effect of S(+)-ketamine on postoperative analgesia requirements in a setting of clinically relevant perioperative analgesia. Total IV anesthesia was induced and maintained with remifentanil (0.125-1.0 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) and a propofol target-controlled infusion (target 2-4 microg/mL). The Ketamine group received a bolus of 0.5 mg/kg S(+)-ketamine before incision, followed by a continuing infusion of 2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) until 2 h after emergence from anesthesia. The Control group received NaCl in the same sequence. After IV morphine provided pain relief down to < or =3 on a visual analog scale scored from 0 to 10, patients were connected to a patient-controlled analgesia device. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of total morphine consumption or VAS scores, either at rest or with movement. In our study, S(+)-ketamine did not contribute to postoperative pain reduction, possibly because of the clinically routine perioperative opioid analgesia.
                Small-dose S(+)-ketamine had no positive effect on postoperative analgesia when administered perioperatively for elective arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair. Unlike investigations of the racemic mixture of ketamine, our study methods included timely standard-practice perioperative opioid analgesia, which seems to make supplemental analgesia unnecessary. The objective of this international, multicenter, open-label trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of up to 12 months of therapy with transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) fentanyl in patients (n = 532) with chronic noncancer pain. The trial was completed by 301 (57%) of the patients. The main outcome measures were pain control assessment, global treatment satisfaction, patient preference for TTS fentanyl, and quality of life. The mean dose of transdermal fentanyl (TDF) increased from 48 to 90 microg/h during a period of 12 months. During treatment, on average 67% of patients within the efficacy analysis group (n = 524) reported very good, good, or moderate pain control. Global satisfaction (very good or good) was also stable at 42%. The majority (86%) of patients reported a preference for TDF over their previous treatment (P < .001, binomial test). Short Form 36 quality-of-life scores improved from baseline for bodily pain. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were nausea (31%), constipation (19%), and somnolence (18%). With regard to opioid-specific adverse events (respiratory depression [< 1%], adrenal insufficiency [< 1%], drug abuse/dependence [1%], and opioid withdrawal syndrome [3%]), these were extremely rare and, with the exception of opioid withdrawal syndrome, none was considered definitively related to the treatment. Long-term treatment with TDF provided a stable degree of pain control in the majority of patients with moderate to severe chronic noncancer pain. It was preferred by the majority of patients compared with their previous opioid medication. Overall, long-term treatment with TDF was generally well tolerated, particularly in view of the low incidence of potentially serious side effects such as drug abuse/dependence and respiratory depression. However, at present, it is important that patients receiving TDF should still be subject to careful assessment and monitoring. We investigated whether intraoperative 'subanesthetic doses' of ketamine have a postoperative anti-hyperalgesic and an analgesic effect and which is the preferential route of administration, either systemic (intravenous, i.v.) or epidural. One hundred patients scheduled for rectal adenocarcinoma surgery under combined epidural/general anesthesia were included. Before skin incision all the patients received an epidural bolus followed by an infusion of continuous bupivacaine/sufentanil/clonidine mixture. They were randomly assigned to receive no ketamine (group 1), i.v. ketamine at the bolus dose of 0.25 mg/kg followed by an infusion of 0.125 mg/kg per h (group 2), 0.5 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg per h (group 3), epidural ketamine 0.25 mg/kg and 0.125 mg/kg per h (group 4), or 0.5 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg per h (group 5). All i.v. and epidural analgesics were stopped at the end of surgery and patients were connected to an i.v. morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Short-term postoperative analgesia (72 h) was assessed by pain visual analog scale scores at rest, cough, and movements as well as by PCA requirements. Wound mechanical hyperalgesia was evaluated and residual pain was assessed by asking the patients at 2 weeks, and 1, 6, and 12 months. The area of hyperalgesia and morphine PCA requirements were significantly reduced in group 3. These patients reported significantly less residual pain until the sixth postoperative month. These observations support the theory that subanesthetic doses of i.v. ketamine (0.5 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.25 mg/kg per h) given during anesthesia reduce wound hyperalgesia and are a useful adjuvant in perioperative balanced analgesia. Moreover, they show that the systemic route clearly is the preferential route.
The short- and long-term effectiveness of opioids, NMDA receptor antagonists, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, calcitonins, and anaesthetics for clinically relevant outcomes that include pain, function, mood, sleep, quality of life, satisfaction and adverse effects remains unclear. Morphine, gabapentin and ketamine demonstrate trends towards short-term analgesic efficacy. Memantine and amitriptyline were ineffective for PLP. Results, however, are to be interpreted with caution as these were based mostly on a small number of studies with limited sample sizes that varied considerably and also lacked long-term efficacy and safety outcomes. The direction of efficacy of calcitonin, anaesthetics and dextromethorphan need further clarification. Larger and more rigorous randomised controlled trials are needed to make stronger recommendations about which medications would be useful for clinical practice.