Outpatient hysteroscopy: a comparison of 2 methods of local analgesia. Pain relief in hysterosalpingography. A comparison of analgesics. Comparison of patient-controlled analgesia and nurse-controlled infusion analgesia after cardiac surgery. A randomized trial comparing local intracervical and combined local and paracervical anesthesia in outpatient hysteroscopy. Psychological characteristics and the effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia. A randomized trial of outpatient hysteroscopy with and without intrauterine anesthesia. Analgesia following major gynecological laparoscopic surgery--PCA versus intermittent intramuscular injection. Patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular analgesic therapy. Patient-controlled analgesia in gynecologic oncology surgery. Patient-controlled analgesia versus conventional intramuscular injection: a cost effectiveness analysis. A prospective study of patient-controlled analgesia. Impact on overall hospital course. The prophylactic use of diclofenac (Voltarol) suppositories in perineal pain after episiotomy. A random allocation double-blind study. Outpatient operative hysteroscopy with bipolar electrode: a prospective multicentre randomized study between local anaesthesia and conscious sedation. A prospective randomized clinical trial on pain control after major abdominal surgery. PCA ketamine and morphine after abdominal hysterectomy. Postoperative morphine use and hyperalgesia are reduced by preoperative but not intraoperative epidural analgesia: implications for preemptive analgesia and the prevention of central sensitization. Efficacy of bupivacaine delivered by wound catheter for post-Caesarean section analgesia. Continuous epidural infusion for analgesia after major abdominal operations: a randomized, prospective, double-blind study. Effects of morphine analgesia on diagnostic accuracy in Emergency Department patients with abdominal pain: a prospective, randomized trial. Stepwise pain score analysis of the effect of local lignocaine on outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
A prospective, randomized study was undertaken to objectively compare pain tolerance of 2 methods of local analgesia for outpatient hysteroscopy. Patients in group 1 received a paracervical block using 20 ml of 1% lignocaine. Patients in group 2 received a uterosacral block using 2 ml of 2% lignocaine. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups (p = < 0.65) in efficacy of pain relief. The method used for patients in group 2 reduces time and costs for outpatient hysteroscopy. Hysterosalpingography provides important information in the evaluation of infertility but is generally considered an uncomfortable and painful procedure. We evaluated various analgesics for decreasing or eliminating the discomfort from this procedure. Two types of analgesia were required to give maximum pain relief during and after the examination in the 180 patients evaluated. The best results were achieved with a combination of naproxen sodium, 550 mg, given orally two hours before the examination, and 20% benzocaine, applied to the cervix. A randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted on 72 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery to compare patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) to nurse-titrated infusion of morphine. Pain and nausea scores were assessed at 5, 20, 32 and 44 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass. Serum cortisol estimations were performed at 24 and 48 hours, and morphine consumption was measured at 0-24 and 24-48 hours. There was no difference between pain scores (P = 0.72), nausea scores (P = 0.52), serum cortisol at 24 and 48 hours (P = 0.32 and P = 0.34), and morphine consumption at 0-24 and 24-48 hours (P = 0.16 and P = 0.12). There was also no difference in the time to tracheal extubation (P = 0.79) and discharge from ICU (P = 0.64). There was a significant association between pain and serum cortisol at 48 hours (P = 0.023). This study also found a tenfold difference in the amount of morphine used (range = 11 to 108 mg), with no significant association with patient age or sex. We could find no significant benefit from the routine use of PCA in cardiac surgical patients. To compare the amount of pain during and after hysteroscopy using local intracervical and combined local and paracervical anesthesia.
                Prospective randomized trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).
                University teaching hospital.
                Eighty-four women who underwent outpatient hysteroscopy for evaluation of the uterine cavity at McGill University Health Center.
                Randomization to local intracervical or combined local and paracervical anesthesia.
                Amount of pain experienced during the procedure and at 10, 30, and 60 minutes after the procedure was measured using a visual analog scale ranging from zero to 10 (zero = no pain; 10 = excruciating pain). The mean age of the patients in the local anesthesia group was 36.1 +/- 0.7 years and in the combined local and paracervical anesthesia group was 35.2 +/- 0.7 years. Patients experienced significantly more pain during than after the procedure. The mean pain scores in the local anesthesia group were significantly higher than in the combined anesthesia group during the procedure (3.2 +/- 0.3 vs 2.1 +/- 0.2; p <.01; 95% CI 0-2), 10 minutes after the procedure (1.9 +/- 0.2 vs 1.5 +/- 0.3; p = .03; 95% CI 0-1), and 30 minutes after the procedure (1.7 +/- 0.2 vs 1.0 +/- 0.2; p = .02; 95% CI 0-1). However, there was no significant difference in pain scores at 60 minutes after the procedure between the local anesthesia and combined anesthesia groups (0.9 +/- 0.2 and 0.7 +/- 0.1, respectively).
                Outpatient hysteroscopy with local or combined local and paracervical anesthesia was well tolerated by patients. However, combined anesthesia was associated with less pain during and at 10 and 30 minutes after the procedure. Most patients considered the pain as mild. We have evaluated the level of state and trait anxiety, neuroticism, extroversion and coping style as predictors of the effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in 110 patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. After operation patients were allocated to receive pain control with either PCA or i.m. injections (IMI). Pain was assessed using the short form McGill pain questionnaire at 6, 18 and 24 h after operation, and by recording the amount of analgesic consumed in the first 24 h after surgery. Both state anxiety and coping style were significant predictors of postoperative pain, irrespective of the method of analgesia used. Patients using PCA experienced significantly better pain control than those receiving IMI. However, it was those with high levels of state anxiety who experienced the greatest reduction in pain with PCA. In addition to achieving better pain control, patients who received PCA used significantly less analgesia and were discharged earlier than patients who received IMI. To evaluate the amount of pain during office hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy with and without intrauterine anesthesia.
                Prospective randomized study (Canadian Task Force classification I).
                Academic teaching center.
                A total of 82 women underwent outpatient hysteroscopy for evaluation of their uterine cavity.
                Randomization to local cervical or combined cervical and intrauterine anesthesia.
                Amount of pain experienced during the procedure; 10, 30, and 60 minutes after the procedure; and during endometrial biopsy. We used a visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 10 (0: no pain, 10: excruciating pain). Of 82 patients, 4 patients were excluded, 36 patients underwent hysteroscopy using local cervical anesthesia, and 42 others with combined cervical and intrauterine anesthesia. The mean age of the patients in the local group was 37.4 +/- 0.8 years and in the combined group was 38.3 +/- 0.7 years. In both groups, patients experienced significantly more pain during and 10 minutes after the procedure than 30 and 60 minutes after. No significant differences occurred in the pain scores during the hysteroscopy, and 10, 30, and 60 minutes after between the 2 anesthesia groups. The pain score in the local group during endometrial biopsy was significantly higher than during (p <.05), 10 minutes after (p <.001), 30 minutes after (p <.001), and 60 minutes after (p <.001) the procedure, respectively. In the combined group, compared with the pain score during endometrial biopsy, the scores during the hysteroscopy (p <.05), 10 minutes after (p <.01), 30 minutes after (p <.001), and 60 minutes after (p <.001) the procedure were also less, respectively.
                Intrauterine anesthesia with medicated saline as a distending medium is ineffective. Endometrial biopsy is associated with more pain than hysteroscopy. To compare the use of patient-controlled analgesia to intermittent intramuscular injections of morphine following major gynecological laparoscopic procedures in order to assess differences in level of pain, sedation, episodes of nausea and/or vomiting, hospitalization time and patient satisfaction with their postoperative analgesia.
                Seventy-two patients undergoing major gynecological laparoscopic surgery were randomized to receive either postoperative analgesia via intermittent intramuscular injection of morphine (Group 1) or patient controlled analgesia (PCA-Group 2). All patients received anesthesia via a standardized protocol. Postoperative pain levels were recorded via a 10 cm visual analogue scale, and sedation scores were recorded on a standard PCA form. Episodes of nausea and vomiting were also recorded on the same form.
                There were no statistically significant differences between intramuscular analgesia and PCA for any of the factors studied. Most significantly it was found that most patients ceased to require either form of parenteral analgesia within 24 hours of their procedure, regardless of the operating time.
                It is important for the surgeon to be aware of the effects of postoperative analgesia on his or her patients' level of satisfaction. We do not recommend the use of PCA analgesia following major laparoscopic gynecological surgery. The pharmacy and nursing time requirements, quality of postoperative pain control, and cost of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and intramuscular (i.m.) analgesic therapy were studied. All timings were conducted with a stopwatch on a single nursing unit that primarily receives gynecologic surgery patients. The various work elements involved in each type of therapy were timed individually. Both quality of analgesia and cost were evaluated in a prospective, randomized study in hysterectomy patients. I.M. patients received meperidine hydrochloride 75-100 mg every three to four hours as needed. PCA patients had access to morphine sulfate 1 mg or meperidine hydrochloride 10 mg, with a six-minute lockout period. The patients scored their pain every four hours. Direct costs for PCA were calculated as drug cost plus tubing cost plus form cost plus maintenance cost plus depreciation cost. Direct costs for i.m. therapy consisted of the cost of drugs. The total mean nursing time per patient was 16.9 minutes for PCA and 10.7 minutes for i.m. therapy. Pharmacy time per patient was 5.1 minutes longer for PCA than for i.m. therapy. Thirty-six hysterectomy patients (17 i.m. and 19 PCA) were enrolled in the study of pain control and cost. Among i.m. patients, 64% of the pain scores were mild or worse, compared with 40% for PCA patients. The median pain scores were moderate for i.m. patients and mild for PCA patients. Scores tended to be lower for PCA patients at 16 and 20 hours. Although equal numbers of patients in the two groups experienced nausea, i.m. patients needed more doses of antiemetics than PCA patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) A prospective comparison of conventional analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia using morphine was conducted. Each patient underwent a major gynecologic oncology procedure and was observed on the post-operative floor. All 192 patients were studied during the first three post-operative days. The findings suggest less total medication and less sedation with equal pain control in the patient-controlled analgesia group. In previous studies comparing patient-controlled-analgesia and intramuscular pain management have been unable to provide conclusive evidence of the benefits of either method of postoperative pain control.
                The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intravenous patient-controlled-analgesia with intermittent intramuscular morphine for Chinese women in the first 24 hours following elective gynaecological surgery.
                A randomized control design was used. The main outcomes were level of pain and cost for the two types of pain management. Participants indicated their level of pain at rest and when deep breathing or coughing on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale, on seven occasions within 24 postoperative hours. Costs for the two types of pain management were based on the costs of equipment, drugs and nursing time.
                A total of 125 women participated in the study. Mean pain level over the 24 hours in the patient-controlled-analgesia group was significantly lower than in the intramuscular group (P < 0.001). Mean pain level over the seven occasions for the patient-controlled-analgesia group was 11.83 points (95% CI 7.14-16.52) lower when at rest and 11.73 points (95% CI 5.96-17.50) lower during motion than the intramuscular group. Cost per patient was $81.10 (Hong Kong) higher for patient-controlled-analgesia than for intramuscular pain management. Women in the patient-controlled-analgesia group had significantly greater satisfaction with pain management than those in the intramuscular group (P < 0.001), but reported significantly more episodes of nausea (P < 0.05).
                While patient-controlled-analgesia was more costly, it was also more effective than conventional on-demand intramuscular opioid injections after laparotomy for gynaecological surgery. Previous studies have shown that patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) provides effective pain control in the postoperative patient. To determine the impact of PCA technology on the overall hospital course, we designed a randomized controlled study comparing patients receiving analgesia using PCA infusion (Abbott Lifecare, Abbott Laboratories; Chicago, IL) with patients receiving analgesia by traditional intramuscular or intravenous methods. All patients had undergone elective cholecystectomy. Sixty-nine patients completed the study, 35 received traditional postoperative analgesia, and 34 received analgesia using the PCA infuser. Comparison of both groups demonstrated no significant difference in postoperative bowel activity with both groups receiving liquids on the first postoperative day. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to postoperative length of stay (3.4 days for PCA vs 3.6 days for traditional). Patients demonstrated a wide range of analgesic requirement in the first 24 hours but the average of the total analgesic required was higher in the PCA group (average, 29.5 mg) than the traditional group (22.8 mg). Urinary complications occurred more commonly in the group of patients receiving traditional analgesia than in the group of patients receiving analgesia with the PCA device. When compared with patients receiving analgesia by traditional methods, patients receiving the PCA infusion required more analgesia with fewer urinary complications and similar postoperative length of stay. One hundred and ten patients who had episiotomies to aid normal vaginal delivery without epidural analgesia were = allocated at random to receive either diclofenac (n = 56) or = placebo (n = 54) suppositories. Pain after episiotomy was assessed at 24 and 48 hours using a combination of a visual analogue scale, a modified pain score and a review of additional analgesia required. All patients in both groups were allowed routine hospital analgesia on request. Our data suggests that very few patients suffered severe pain, even in the placebo group. However, the prophylactic use of diclofenac suppositories significantly reduced perineal pain in the first 24 hours, although the difference was less marked by 48 hours. Overall additional analgesia requirement was correspondingly less in the diclofenac group. The study was designed to compare local anaesthesia and conscious sedation for outpatient bipolar operative hysteroscopy in terms of pain control and patients' satisfaction.
                A prospective multicentre randomized study was carried out in university hospitals and in a private endoscopy unit. A total of 166 women with surgically treatable lesions associated with infertility or abnormal uterine bleeding was considered eligible for the study. Patients were randomized, using a computer-generated randomization list, into two groups. Group A (82 patients) underwent operative hysteroscopy with local anaesthesia. Group B (84 patients) received conscious sedation. Operative hysteroscopy was performed with a bipolar electrosurgical device to cut, vaporize and coagulate. Main outcome measures were pain control during the procedure, the post-operative pain score at 15 and 60 min, and at 24 h after the procedure, and patients' satisfaction rate.
                All procedures were completed within 35 min, the amount of saline used varied from 400-1200 ml. There were no significant differences between local anaesthesia and conscious sedation in terms of pain control during the procedure and in postoperative pain at different intervals. Satisfaction rate was similar in the two groups.
                Both local anaesthesia and conscious sedation can be used for operative hysteroscopy using a bipolar electrosurgical system without significant differences in terms of pain control and patients' satisfaction. This study was conducted in order to investigate the advantages and limitations of four analgesic modalities: a) epidural morphine; b) intravenous morphine; c) patient controlled intravenous morphine (patient-controlled analgesia); and d) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Eighty patients undergoing major abdominal surgical procedures were prospectively and randomly treated with one of the above-mentioned analgesic methods. Evaluation of pain perception was done using the visual analogue pain score and the simple descriptive scale 4 hours after the procedure, in the early morning on postoperative day 1 and in the afternoon on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. The need for supplementary analgesia and the onset of complications, if any, were also evaluated for each patient. Patient-controlled intravenous morphine yielded the best analgesic effect over the entire period. Epidural morphine was more effective in the very early postoperative period compared to modalities (b) and (d). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, on the other hand, were more effective on the later postoperative days. None of the patients in group C needed supplementary analgesia, as against 20% in group A, 55% in group B and 40% in group D. Patients with hypochondriasis scores > 70 or depression scores > 70 required supplementation of analgesia more often. Morphine proved to be the drug of choice. Drug titration may be modulated in relation to the psychological characteristics of the patient. The best drug titration modality, in fact, is patient-controlled analgesia. Following a standardized general anaesthetic for total abdominal hysterectomy, patients received either patient controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine 1 mg/ml (group M, n = 33) or morphine 1 mg/ml plus ketamine 2 mg/ml (group K, n = 37) for 48 hours in a randomized, double-blind fashion. In 43 women the area of allodynia around the scar was mapped as a measure of the degree of central sensitization. A significant reduction in the area of allodynia was found in those receiving ketamine with morphine (42 cm2 [interquartile range (IQR) 57] compared with 57 cm2 [IQR 82] z = -2.0, P = 0.04) in those receiving morphine alone. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to age, or weight, or between the subgroups within which the area of allodynia was measured with respect to length of incision. No significant differences were found between the groups with respect to pain scores, total or hourly drug consumption, patient satisfaction, nausea scores or antiemetic use. Patients in group K were more likely to require PCA for a shorter period than those in group M (median 40 hours, IQR 26 versus 48 hours IQR 7). Ten patients in group K were withdrawn because of side-effects (dysphoria n = 4, nausea n = 2, pruritus n = 4) compared with one in group M (nausea n = 1) (P = 0.006). The potential usefulness of ketamine after hysterectomy was offset by a high incidence of adverse effects and a lack of opioid-sparing effects, such that combined intravenous ketamine and morphine PCA as used in this study cannot be recommended for routine care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative morphine-sparing effects and reduction in pain and secondary mechanical hyperalgesia after preincisional or postincisional epidural administration of a local anesthetic and an opioid compared with a sham epidural control.
                Patients undergoing major gynecologic surgery by laparotomy were randomly assigned to three groups and studied in a double-blinded manner. Group 1 received epidural lidocaine and fentanyl before incision and epidural saline 40 min after incision. Group 2 received epidural saline before incision and epidural lidocaine and fentanyl 40 min after incision. Group 3 received a sham epidural control (with saline injected into a catheter taped to the back) before and 40 min after incision. All patients underwent surgery with general anesthesia.
                One hundred forty-one patients completed the study (group 1, n = 45; group 2, n = 49; group 3, n = 47). Cumulative patient-controlled analgesia morphine consumption at 48 h was significantly lower (P = 0.04) in group 1 (89.8 +/- 43.3 mg) than group 3 (112.5 +/- 71.5 mg) but not group 2 (95.4 +/- 60.2 mg), although the hourly rate of morphine consumption between 24 and 48 h after surgery was significantly lower (P < 0.0009) in group 1 (1.25 +/- 0.02 mg/h) than group 2 (1.41 +/- 0.02 mg/h). Twenty-four hours after surgery, the visual analog scale pain score on movement was significantly less intense (P = 0.005) in group 1 (4.9 +/- 2.2 cm) than group 3 (6.0 +/- 2.6 cm) but not group 2 (5.3 +/- 2.5 cm), and the von Frey pain threshold near the wound was significantly higher (P = 0.03) in group 1 (6.4 +/- 0.6 log mg) than in group 3 (6.1 +/- 0.8 log mg) but not group 2 (6.2 +/- 0.7 log mg).
                Preincisional administration of epidural lidocaine and fentanyl was associated with a significantly lower rate of morphine use, lower cumulative morphine consumption, and reduced hyperalgesia compared with a sham epidural condition. These results highlight the importance of including a standard treatment control group to avoid the problems of interpretation that arise when two-group studies of preemptive analgesia (preincisional vs. postsurgery) fail to find the anticipated effects. A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted to assess contribution to postoperative analgesia of intermittent instillation of 0.25% bupivacaine beneath the rectus sheath in 70 women delivered by lower uterine segment Caesarean section. The operations were performed via a Pfannenstiel incision under spinal anaesthesia. Background intravenous narcotic analgesia was provided with a patient controlled analgesia system (PCAS) using a standard morphine regimen. Overall (44 hr) mean morphine consumption was significantly greater in the placebo (saline) group compared to the treatment group (84.2 mg versus 63.3 mg. Two tailed t test p < 0.001). The most significant intergroup differences in narcotic use were found in the first 4 hours and between 24 and 36 hours after commencing PCAS (Two tailed t test p = 0.014 and 0.003 respectively). Subjective pain scores were assessed with a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). The mean peak VAS score was greater in controls (5.37) than the treatment group (4.25) between 18 and 24 hours postoperatively (Mann-Whitney U = 424, p = 0.027). There were no intergroup differences in pain scores for any other time period. The overall incidence of nausea was lower in the treatment group compared to the control group (Chi squared with Yates' correction p = 0.046) and a lower degree of sedation was seen in those receiving bupivacaine between 4 and 8 hours after commencing PCAS (Mann-Whitney U = 427, p = 0.028). No differences in other narcotic related side-effects (vomiting and pruritus) were shown between groups. Regular instillation of 0.25% bupivacaine beneath the rectus sheath of women delivered by Caesarean section reduces their morphine requirements by 25% in the 44 hours after operation, with an associated reduction in both nausea and early sedation. We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of continuous epidural analgesia for 72 hours after major abdominal procedures. Patients were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups: epidural morphine, epidural bupivacaine, a combination of morphine and bupivacaine, epidural saline solution, and no epidural catheter. All patients received supplemental morphine sulfate or meperidine hydrochloride, intramuscularly or intravenously, as needed. Epidural infusion was begun at 2 to 4 ml/hr, depending on age and height, with two increments of 1 ml/hr allowed if pain relief was insufficient. All pain management decisions were made by nurses, who also monitored epidural function. Performance was measured four ways: pain as measured at regular intervals in the 72-hour period with a visual analog, pain as measured after 72 hours with the McGill Pain Questionnaire, amount of supplemental narcotics needed, and recovery of respiratory function and ambulation as percent of preoperative levels. The group that received the combination of morphine and bupivacaine did best on all measures; in most instances the difference between the results seen with the combination regimen and those seen with saline solution or no catheter were significant at the 0.05 level. With the exception of pruritus, complications were evenly distributed among all treatment groups, including noncatheterized controls. We conclude that epidural analgesia with the combination of morphine and bupivacaine is safe, is easily managed, and gives pain relief superior to that provided by traditional, systemic administration of narcotics. Because of concerns about masking important physical findings, there is controversy surrounding whether it is safe to provide analgesia to patients with undifferentiated abdominal pain. The purpose of this study was to address the effects of analgesia on the physical examination and diagnostic accuracy for patients with abdominal pain.
                The study was a prospective, double-blind clinical trial in which adult Emergency Department (ED) patients with undifferentiated abdominal pain were randomized to receive placebo (control group, n = 36) or morphine sulphate (MS group, n = 38). Diagnostic and physical examination assessments were recorded before and after a 60-minute period during which study medication was titrated. Diagnostic accuracy and physical examination changes were compared between groups using univariate statistical analyses.
                There were no differences between control and MS groups with respect to changes in physical or diagnostic accuracy. The overall likelihood of change in severity of tenderness was similar in MS (37.7%) as compared with control (35.3%) patients (risk ratio [RR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-1.78). MS patients were no more likely than controls to have a change in pain location (34.0% versus 41.2%, RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.50-1.36). Diagnostic accuracy did not differ between MS and control groups (64.2% versus 66.7%, RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.73-1.27). There were no differences between groups with respect to likelihood of any change occurring in the diagnostic list (37.7% versus 31.4%, RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.71-2.05). Correlation with clinical course and final diagnosis revealed no instance of masking of physical examination findings.
                Results of this study support a practice of early provision of analgesia to patients with undifferentiated abdominal pain.
                Copyright 2003 by the American College of Surgeons OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of lignocaine gel in reducing the overall pain and pain of individual steps during outpatient hysteroscopy in comparison with placebo (no anesthesia). DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient hysteroscopy clinic in a regional hospital in Hong Kong. PATIENT(s): A total of 500 Chinese patients undergoing outpatient hysteroscopy. INTERVENTION(s): Application of lignocaine gel to the cervix during outpatient hysteroscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(s): Mean pain score using present pain intensity, overall pain score measured by total area under the curve, and the pain score of individual steps in the procedure in patients receiving lignocaine gel were compared with those of patients having no anesthesia. The failure rate and poor-view rate in both groups were also compared. RESULT(s): There were no statistically significant differences in mean pain score, overall pain score, and pain score of individual steps between the lignocaine group and controls. The failure rate and poor-view rate also showed no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION(s): Outpatient hysteroscopy without anesthesia is acceptable to most Chinese women, and the local application of lignocaine gel is not effective in reducing pain.
There was a significant reduction in the mean pain score with the use of analgesia during and within 30 minutes after outpatient hysteroscopy.