[Sotalol and quinidine/verapamil (Cordichin) in chronic atrial fibrillation--conversion and 12-month follow-up--a randomized comparison]. Efficacy and proarrhythmic hazards of pharmacologic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: prospective comparison of sotalol versus quinidine. Maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation: an AFFIRM substudy of the first antiarrhythmic drug. The efficacy of quinidine and disopyramide in the maintenance of sinus rhythm after electroconversion from atrial fibrillation. A double-blind study comparing quinidine, disopyramide and placebo. Maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation; sotalol vs bisoprolol. Efficacy and safety of sotalol versus quinidine for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after conversion of atrial fibrillation. SOCESP Investigators. The Cardiology Society of São Paulo. Use of metoprolol CR/XL to maintain sinus rhythm after conversion from persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Maintenance of sinus rhythm after DC reversion of atrial fibrilllation. A double-blind controlled trial of long-acting quinidine bisulphate. Propafenone versus sotalol for suppression of recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Effect of quinidine on maintaining sinus rhythm after conversion of atrial fibrillation or flutter. A multicentre study from Stockholm. Maintenance of sinus rhythm with oral d,l-sotalol therapy in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter. d,l-Sotalol Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Study Group. Propafenone versus disopyramide for maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: a randomized, double-blind study. PRODIS Study Group. [Effects of amiodarone versus sotalol in treatment of atrial fibrillation: a random controlled clinical study]. A comparison between oral antiarrhythmic drugs in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: the pilot study of prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation (SPPAF), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Amiodarone versus sotalol for atrial fibrillation. Antiarrhythmic efficacy of azimilide in patients with atrial fibrillation. Maintenance of sinus rhythm after conversion to sinus rhythm. Disopyramide in the maintenance of sinus rhythm after electroconversion of atrial fibrillation. A placebo-controlled one-year follow-up study. Prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardioversion: results of the PAFAC trial. Pilsicainide for conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm in chronic atrial fibrillation: a placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Efficacy of azimilide for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the presence and absence of structural heart disease. Long-term efficacy and safety of propafenone and sotalol for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after conversion of recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Sotalol versus quinidine for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after direct current conversion of atrial fibrillation. Prophylaxis of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass grafting with low-dose sotalol. Hemodynamic effects and safety of sotalol in the prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgery. Sotalol versus propafenone for long-term maintenance of normal sinus rhythm in patients with recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Arrhythmias after coronary bypass surgery. Propafenone for conversion and prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation. Propafenone Atrial Fibrillation Trial Investigators. Effect of Sotalol in the prevention of atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass grafting. Efficacy and safety of oral dofetilide in converting to and maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter: the symptomatic atrial fibrillation investigative research on dofetilide (SAFIRE-D) study. Oral sotalol reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation--Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomised trial. Prevention of atrial fibrillation or flutter by acebutolol after coronary bypass grafting. Effectiveness of sotalol in preventing supraventricular tachyarrhythmias shortly after coronary artery bypass grafting. Preoperative beta-blocker use reduces atrial fibrillation in off-pump coronary bypass surgery. Epicardial, biatrial synchronous pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Long-term maintenance of normal sinus rhythm in patients with current symptomatic atrial fibrillation: amiodarone vs propafenone, both in low doses. Effectiveness of metoprolol in preventing atrial fibrillation and flutter in the postoperative period of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Azimilide vs. placebo and sotalol for persistent atrial fibrillation: the A-COMET-II (Azimilide-CardiOversion MaintEnance Trial-II) trial. Effective prevention of atrial fibrillation by continuous atrial overdrive pacing after coronary artery bypass surgery. Efficacy and safety of flecainide acetate in the maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Efficacy of dofetilide in the treatment of atrial fibrillation-flutter in patients with reduced left ventricular function: a Danish investigations of arrhythmia and mortality on dofetilide (diamond) substudy. Oral d,l sotalol reduces the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in coronary artery bypass surgery patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. [A comparison between flecainide and sotalol in the prevention of recurrences of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation]. Predictors, prevention, and long-term prognosis of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft operations. Quinidine in maintenance of sinus rhythm after electroconversion of chronic atrial fibrillation. A controlled clinical study. A randomized assessment of the incremental role of ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms after antral pulmonary vein isolation for long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation. Randomized study comparing combined pulmonary vein-left atrial junction disconnection and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation versus pulmonary vein-left atrial junction disconnection alone in patients presenting with typical atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. Beta-blocker effects on postoperative atrial fibrillation. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. Combination of sotalol and magnesium prevents atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. [A comparison between amiodarone and disopyramide in a delayed-release formulation in the prevention of recurrences of symptomatic atrial fibrillation].
Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common arrhythmias, leading at least in a subset of patients to severe symptoms (palpitations, weakness, syncope), and to hemodynamic impairment especially in the clinical setting of left ventricular dysfunction. Thus, in many cases restauration of sinus rhythm is indicated because of the negative effects of reduced cardiac output. Quinidine has been the first line drug for many years and has been proven to be highly effective especially when combined with Verapamil. But there is growing concern about using quinidine and other class I-anti-arrhythmic agents because of some hints in clinical trials for increased longterm mortality on these drugs. This study was undertaken to test the efficacy of Sotalol, a beta-blocker with additional strong class-III antiarrhythmic action, compared to a fixed combination of Quinidine and Verapamil for conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation and maintenance of sinus rhythm after medical or electrical cardioversion. To avoid early proarrhythmic effects, potassium values in the range of "high"-normal values (> 4.3 mval/L) were tried to be obtained. 82 patients were randomly assigned to receive either Sotalol or Quinidine/Verapamil. There was no difference between the groups as far as the underlying heart disease, duration of atrial fibrillation (mean 219 days) and other clinical features including echocardiographic parameters were concerned. The dose of the drug was weight-related individually adjusted, and the drug was continued thereafter. If sinus rhythm could not be established at that time, electric cardioversion was performed and the drug was continued in lower dosage thereafter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) This study compared the efficacy and safety of sotalol and quinidine for conversion and prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation.
                Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia. Pharmacologic therapy has been advocated for both immediate restoration of sinus rhythm and prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation. Quinidine is the therapeutic mainstay for both purposes, but its safety has recently been questioned. Although sotalol has been used successfully to maintain sinus rhythm after direct current cardioversion, its efficacy in pharmacologically reverting atrial fibrillation has not been examined.
                Fifty consecutive patients with persistent atrial fibrillation were randomized to receive quinidine or sotalol for up to 7 days to restore sinus rhythm. Patients were followed up for 6 months.
                Quinidine was more effective than sotalol in terminating atrial fibrillation (60% vs. 20%, p = 0.009). When nonresponders to drug therapy underwent subsequent direct current cardioversion, total conversion rates in the quinidine and sotalol groups were comparable (88% vs. 68%, p = 0.17), as was the efficacy of the two drugs in preventing recurrent atrial fibrillation. Side effects necessitating drug discontinuation were more often observed with quinidine. No patient receiving sotalol but four patients receiving quinidine had drug-associated arrhythmia (torsade de pointes in three patients, sustained ventricular tachycardia in one patient). Precordial QT dispersion determined on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) increased with quinidine (mean +/- SD 34 +/- 9 vs. 44 +/- 16 ms, p = 0.02), indicating enhanced inhomogeneity in ventricular repolarization. There was no change in QT dispersion in patients receiving sotalol (36 +/- 18 vs. 40 +/- 17 ms, p = 0.44).
                Quinidine is more effective than sotalol in terminating atrial fibrillation but is associated with more side effects. The proarrhythmic risk may be related to quinidine's propensity to increase disparity in ventricular repolarization. This risk warrants careful ECG monitoring during the 1st 4 to 7 days of therapy. Because most proarrhythmic effects occurred shortly after restoration of sinus rhythm, observation should continue > or = 2 to 3 days after sinus rhythm is reestablished. This study evaluated the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF).
                The most effective and safest antiarrhythmic drug for the treatment of AF is unknown.
                The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study compared two treatment strategies--rate control and rhythm control--in patients with AF and risk factors for stroke or death. This substudy, performed in patients randomized to rhythm control, compared different antiarrhythmic drugs by randomly assigning the first drug treatment to: 1) amiodarone, 2) sotalol, or 3) a class I drug. The primary end point was the proportion of patients alive, in sinus rhythm, with no additional cardioversions and still taking the assigned drug at one year. Comparisons were made between patients eligible for each of three drug pairs.
                At one year, in 222 patients randomized between amiodarone and class I agents, 62% were successfully treated with amiodarone, compared with 23% taking class I agents (p < 0.001). In 256 patients randomized between amiodarone and sotalol, 60% versus 38% were successfully treated, respectively (p = 0.002). In 183 patients randomized between sotalol and class I agents, 34% versus 23% were successfully treated, respectively (p = 0.488), although this portion of the substudy was stopped early when amiodarone was shown to be better than class I agents. Sinus rhythm was achieved in nearly 80% of patients at one-year follow-up with serial therapy. Adverse effects were common.
                Amiodarone was more effective at one year than either sotalol or class I agents for the strategy of maintenance of sinus rhythm without cardioversion. In order to compare the relative efficacy of quinidine, disopyramide and a placebo in the maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion from atrial fibrillation and in order to examine the incidence of side-effects, 82 patients with continuous atrial fibrillation (duration more than 1 month but less than 3 years) were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive quinidine, disopyramide or placebo. Six months after cardioversion there was no significant difference between any of the three groups as regards the number of patients remaining in sinus rhythm. The greater distortion of the atrial architecture which occurs in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease may explain the failure of these anti-arrhythmic agents to prolong the duration of sinus rhythm in this study, in which patients with valvular heart disease comprised 76% of the total group. The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of sotalol and bisoprolol in the maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
                Patients (n=128) were randomized to sotalol (80 mg b.i.d.) or bisoprolol (5 mg x day(-1)). Patients with contraindications to beta-blockers, class III antiarrhythmic drugs or prior treatment with use of study medication for prevention of atrial fibrillation were excluded. Follow-up clinical evaluation was performed 1 day and 1 month after cardioversion and thereafter at 3-month intervals.
                There were no group differences in baseline clinical characteristics. After a follow-up of 12 months, 59% of all patients were still in sinus rhythm. The fraction remaining in sinus rhythm was calculated for the two groups by Kaplan--Meier analysis. During follow-up, 41% of patients on sotalol and 42% on bisoprolol developed atrial fibrillation (ns). In two patients (3.1%) on sotalol, life-threatening proarrhythmias (torsade de pointes tachycardias) occurred, whereas none were found in the bisoprolol group. Symptomatic bradycardias occurred in two patients on sotalol and three on bisoprolol.
                This study demonstrates that sotalol (160 mg x day(-1)) and bisoprolol (5 mg x day(-1)) are equally effective in maintaining sinus rhythm. Because of the side effects of sotalol, bisoprolol seems to be advantageous for maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
                Copyright 2001 The European Society of Cardiology. To compare the efficacy and safety of sotalol and quinidine after conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) of <6 months, a prospective multicenter trial enrolled 121 patients who were randomized to receive dl-sotalol (160 to 320 mg/day, 58 patients) or quinidine sulfate (600 to 800 mg/day, 63 patients). Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of <0.40 or left atrial diameter >5.2 cm were excluded. After 6 months of follow-up, using the Kaplan-Meier method, the probabilities of success were comparable between sotalol (74%) and quinidine (68%), but recurrences occurred later with sotalol than with quinidine (69 vs 10 days, p <0.05). Four patients developed proarrhythmic events, 3 (5%) with sotalol and 1 (2%) with quinidine, which were all associated with diuretic therapy. In patients converted from recent-onset AF (< or = 72 hours), sotalol was more effective than quinidine (93% vs 64%, p = 0.01), whereas in chronic AF (> 72 hours), quinidine was more effective than sotalol (68% vs 33%, p <0.05). During recurrences, the ventricular rate was significantly reduced in patients taking sotalol (98 to 82 beats/min, p <0.05). Independent predictors of therapeutic success were recent-onset AF in the sotalol group (p <0.001) and absence of hypertension in the quinidine group (p <0.05). In conclusion, sotalol and quinidine have comparable efficacy and safety for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in the overall group. In recent-onset AF, sotalol was more effective, whereas in chronic AF, quinidine had a better result. Recurrences occurred later with sotalol when compared with quinidine. Because of proarrhythmia, these drugs should be used judiciously in patients on diuretic therapy. The primary objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy of metoprolol CR/XL to reduce the risk of relapse after cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm.
                Indirect data from studies with d,l sotalol provide evidence that the beta-blocking effects of the compound are important in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
                After successful conversion to sinus rhythm, 394 patients with a history of persistent atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned to treatment with metoprolol CR/XL or placebo. The two treatment groups were similar with respect to all pretreatment characteristics. Patients were seen on an outpatient basis for recording of resting electrocardiogram (ECG) after one week, one, three and six months of follow-up or whenever they felt that they had a relapse into atrial fibrillation or experienced an adverse event.
                In the metoprolol CR/XL group, 96 patients (48.7%) had a relapse into atrial fibrillation compared with 118 patients (59.9%) in the placebo group (p = 0.005). Heart rate in patients after a relapse into atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the metoprolol group (98 +/- 23 beats/min) than in the placebo group (107 +/- 27 beats/min). The rate of adverse events reported was similar in both groups when the difference in follow-up time was taken into account.
                The results of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients after cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation showed that metoprolol CR/XL was effective in preventing relapse into atrial fibrillation or flutter. Ninety-two patients were entered in a double-blind controlled trial of long-acting quinidine bisulphate for the maintenance of sinus rhythm following DC reversion of atrial fibrillation. By random selection two statistically comparable groups of patients were obtained, a control group being given a placebo and a treated group quinidine bisulphate 1.5 g. per day in two 12-hourly doses. Thirty-seven patients were followed up in the control group and twenty-eight patients in the treated group. The maintenance of sinus rhythm in the treated group was significantly longer than in the control group, especially during the first three months. The mean serum quinidine level in the treated group was 2.2+/-0.3 (SEM) mg. per litre. There was one death among the patients treated with quinidine, which may have been due to quinidine toxicity caused by a high serum quinidine level. Because conventional antiarrhythmic therapy is often ineffective in maintaining sinus rhythm or is associated with adverse side effects in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), there is a clinical need to test newer agents. One hundred patients with AF who had unsuccessful therapy with 1.9 +/- 1.0 type IA antiarrhythmic agents were randomized to receive either propafenone (n = 50) or sotalol (n = 50). Patients were stratified into 4 groups based on AF pattern (chronic vs paroxysmal) and left atrial size (large [> or = 4.5 cm] vs small [< 4.5]). The proportion of patients remaining in sinus rhythm on each agent was calculated for each group by the Kaplan-Meier method. For patients randomized to propafenone, 46 +/- 8%, 41 +/- 8% and 30 +/- 8% remained in sinus rhythm at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively, after cardioversion. A similar proportion of patients treated with sotalol remained in sinus rhythm at follow-up (49 +/- 7%, 46 +/- 8% and 37 +/- 8% at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively; p = NS). The proportion of patients remaining in sinus rhythm on propafenone and sotalol was not dependent on arrhythmia pattern or left atrial dimension. Except for constipation that occurred more frequently in patients treated with propafenone, adverse side effects were equally distributed between the 2 therapies. Two patients receiving sotalol died during follow-up. Propafenone and sotalol, 2 new antiarrhythmic agents, were found to be equally effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in 100 patients with recurrent AF. Response rates were not affected by arrhythmia pattern, left atrial size or unsuccessful prior drug therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) In a controlled study comprising 176 patients, quinidine in the form of Kinidin Durules was found to reduced significantly the recurrence of the atrial fibrillation during a 1-year follow-up period after successful electric shock conversion. After one year, 51 per cent (52/101) of the patients in the quinidine group, and 28 per cent (21/75) in the control group remained in sinus rhythm (P smaller than 0.001). No less than 43 per cent of the patients converted to sinus rhythm during treatment with maintenance doses of quinidine sulphate before intended DC conversion. Gastrointestinal side-effects were not uncommon, and caused interruption of quinidine treatment in some cases. Currently d,l-sotalol is widely used to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter, although a randomized dose-response study has not previously been conducted to guide therapy for this indication. This study summarizes findings of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized trial evaluating the efficacy, safety, and dose-response relation of 3 fixed doses of d,l-sotalol (80, 120, and 160 mg twice daily) for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in 253 patients with atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter. All patients were in sinus rhythm at randomization. Treatment (69 patients on placebo, 59 on 80 mg, 63 on 120 mg, and 62 on 160 mg given twice daily) was continued for 12 months or until documented recurrence of symptomatic atrial fibrillation and/or flutter. Transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitoring was used to detect symptomatic recurrences. Demographic characteristics were not different in the 4 groups. Structural heart disease was present in 57% of patients. Patients with a history of heart failure were excluded. The time from randomization to symptomatic arrhythmia recurrence was significantly longer in the 2 higher d,l-sotalol dose groups than in the placebo group. The median times to recurrence were 27, 106, 229, and 175 days for the placebo, 80, 120, and 160 mg groups, respectively. There were no deaths or cases of torsade de pointes, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or ventricular fibrillation reported. Thus, d,l-sotalol appeared to be both safe and effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and/or flutter. Further, the 120-mg twice daily dose appeared to provide the most favorable benefit and/or risk. Safety and efficacy of propafenone and disopyramide for long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion was studied in 56 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (median arrhythmia duration, 5 months). After cardioversion, patients were randomly assigned to receive double-blind propafenone 300 mg tid (25 patients) or disopyramide 250 mg tid (31 patients). Downward dose adjustment was allowed in case of intolerable side effects. The endpoints were arrhythmia recurrence; and side effects not amenable to dose reduction. For patients randomized to propafenone (mean dose, 878 +/- 65 mg/day), 66% [95% confidence interval [(CI) 46-85%] and 55% (95% CI, 34-76%) remained in sinus rhythm at 3 and 6 months, respectively (Kaplan-Meier method). Similar figures were found with disopyramide (mean dose, 704 +/- 81 mg/day): 71% (95% CI, 54-87%) and 67% (95% CI, 50-84%) at 3 and 6 months, respectively (p = NS). In the patients with a relapse of atrial fibrillation, the ventricular rate while still using the prophylactic agents did not increase significantly compared with precardioversion. However, one patient on disopyramide had an excessively high relapse heart rate (170 vs. 100 beats/min). Side effects were more frequent on disopyramide. Side effects necessitating drug discontinuation occurred in 12 patients: 4 patients (16%) on propafenone and 8 (26%) on disopyramide. Severe adverse effects occurred in two patients, who developed heart failure while on disopyramide. There were no proarrhythmic events or deaths. Thus, propafenone and disopyramide are equally effective for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Propafenone is, however, better tolerated than disopyramide, which may cause heart failure. To evaluate the effects and adverse reactions of amiodarone and sotalol in treatment of atrial fibrillation.
                One hundred and two patients with atrial fibrillation, 56 males and 46 females, aged 56 +/- 11, were randomized into 2 equal groups: amiodarone group, taking amiodarone 600 mg/d for 7 days, 400 mg/d for 7 days, 200 mg/d for 7 days, and then 200 mg/d as maintenance dosage if conversion to sinus rhythm occurred; and sotalol group, taking sotalol 40-80 mg/d for one week, 160 mg/d for 2 weeks and then 40-80 mg/d as maintenance dosage if conversion to sinus rhythm occurred. If the cardiac rhythm failed to be converted to sinus rhythm after three week the medication was stopped. All the patients were followed up for 12-24 months and therapeutic effects were evaluated by echocardiography, electrocardiogram and Holter monitor.
                (1) Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 40 patients in the amiodarone group with an effective rate of 78.4%, and in 36 patients in the sotalol group with an effective rate of 70.6%. (2) Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in the first week in 34 patients of the amiodarone group and in 10 patients of the sotalol group. (3) 67.5% of the patients with conversion to sinus rhythm in the amiodarone group and 41.7% of the patients with conversion to sinus rhythm in the sotalol group maintained sinus rhythm in the following 12 months; and 44.4% patients with conversion to sinus rhythm in the amiodarone group and 26.7% of the patients with conversion to sinus rhythm in the following 24 months. (4) 10 patients in the sotalol group taking a maintenance dosage of 80 mg/d showed atrial ventricular block and severe bradycardia during the follow-up of 6-2 months, then the medication was stopped, but there was no severe arrhythmia in amiodarone group. (5) It was difficult to maintain sinus rhythm when atrial fibrillation lasting longer than 12 months was a predictive factor of failure to maintain sinus rhythm.
                There is no significant difference between amiodarone and sotalol in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. However, amiodarone is more effective in maintenance of sinus rhythm than sotalol. The adverse reaction of amiodarone on heart is less severe than that of sotalol. Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently occurs after cardiac surgical procedures, and beta-blockers, sotalol, and amiodarone may reduce the frequency of AF after open heart surgery. This pilot trial was designed to test whether each of the active oral drug regimens is superior to placebo for prevention of postoperative AF and whether there are differences in favor of 1 of the preventive strategies.
                We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in which patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the absence of heart failure and without significant left ventricular dysfunction (n = 253; average age, 65 +/- 11 years) received oral amiodarone plus metoprolol (n = 63), metoprolol alone (n = 62), sotalol (n = 63), or placebo (n = 65). Patients receiving combination therapy (amiodarone plus metoprolol) and those receiving sotalol had a significantly lower frequency of AF (30.2% and 31.7%; absolute difference, 23.6% and 22.1%; odds ratios [OR], 0.37 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.77, P <.01 vs placebo] and 0.40 [0.19 to 0.82, P =.01 vs placebo]) compared with patients receiving placebo (53.8%). Treatment with metoprolol was associated with a 13.5% absolute reduction of AF (P =.16; OR, 0.58 [0.29 to 1.17]. Treatment effects did not differ significantly between active drug groups. Adverse events including cerebrovascular accident, postoperative ventricular tachycardia, nausea, and dyspepsia, in hospital death, postoperative infections, and hypotension, were similar among the groups. Bradycardia necessitating dose reduction or drug withdrawal occurred in 3.1% (placebo), 3.2% (combined amiodarone and metoprolol; P =.65 vs placebo), 12.7% (sotalol; P <.05 vs placebo), and 16.1% (metoprolol; P <.05 vs placebo). Patients in the placebo group had a nonsignificantly longer length of hospital stay as compared with the active treatment groups (13.1 +/- 8.9 days vs 11.3 +/- 7; P =.10), with no significant difference between the active treatment groups.
                Oral active prophylaxis with either sotalol or amiodarone plus metoprolol may reduce the rate of AF after cardiac surgery in a population at high risk for postoperative AF. Treatment with metoprolol alone resulted in a trend to a lower risk for postoperative AF. The optimal pharmacologic means to restore and maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation remains controversial.
                In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 665 patients who were receiving anticoagulants and had persistent atrial fibrillation to receive amiodarone (267 patients), sotalol (261 patients), or placebo (137 patients) and monitored them for 1 to 4.5 years. The primary end point was the time to recurrence of atrial fibrillation beginning on day 28, determined by means of weekly transtelephonic monitoring.
                Spontaneous conversion occurred in 27.1 percent of the amiodarone group, 24.2 percent of the sotalol group, and 0.8 percent of the placebo group, and direct-current cardioversion failed in 27.7 percent, 26.5 percent, and 32.1 percent, respectively. The median times to a recurrence of atrial fibrillation were 487 days in the amiodarone group, 74 days in the sotalol group, and 6 days in the placebo group according to intention to treat and 809, 209, and 13 days, respectively, according to treatment received. Amiodarone was superior to sotalol (P<0.001) and to placebo (P<0.001), and sotalol was superior to placebo (P<0.001). In patients with ischemic heart disease, the median time to a recurrence of atrial fibrillation was 569 days with amiodarone therapy and 428 days with sotalol therapy (P=0.53). Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm significantly improved the quality of life and exercise capacity. There were no significant differences in major adverse events among the three groups.
                Amiodarone and sotalol are equally efficacious in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Amiodarone is superior for maintaining sinus rhythm, but both drugs have similar efficacy in patients with ischemic heart disease. Sustained sinus rhythm is associated with an improved quality of life and improved exercise performance.
                Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. Azimilide dihydrochloride (azimilide) is an investigational antiarrhythmic drug that has been tested in patients with a variety of arrhythmias. In patients with atrial fibrillation, it has shown excellent efficacy in some previous trials and minimal efficacy in others.
                Patients who had symptomatic atrial fibrillation for > 48 hours but < 6 months were eligible for this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients were admitted to a hospital and randomly assigned to receive either azimilide 125 mg or a matched placebo twice daily for 3 days and then once daily. Patients who were in sinus rhythm spontaneously or had sinus rhythm restored by electric cardioversion on day 4 were discharged from the hospital. Recurrence of atrial fibrillation was documented by electrocardiogram. In the primary efficacy analysis, time to recurrence in the 2 treatment groups was compared with the log-rank test in the subgroup of patients with structural heart disease. Safety was assessed as deaths, adverse events, and serious adverse events.
                A total of 446 patients were randomized in the study; 314 were in the subgroup with structural heart disease. The median time to arrhythmia recurrence in both treatment groups with structural heart disease was 13 days, and the difference between treatments was not significant (P = .4596, n = 314). The relative risk for recurrence (placebo:azimilide) was 1.104 (95% CI 0.849-1.436). There was 1 death in the placebo group and 3 in the azimilide group.
                Azimilide did not demonstrate clinically important or statistically significant efficacy in reducing the risk for arrhythmia recurrence in patients with structural heart disease who were in atrial fibrillation and converted to sinus rhythm. In this multicentre study, 90 patients who left hospital in sinus rhythm after electroconversion of atrial fibrillation were randomized to double-blind treatment with either disopyramide (n = 44) or placebo (n = 46). The groups were comparable regarding age and sex distribution, duration of atrial fibrillation, heart volume and NYHA-classification. Life-table analysis was used to estimate the percentage of patients still in sinus rhythm and tolerating treatment at control visits after 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. After 1 month there was already a significant difference (P less than 0.01) between the two groups (disopyramide 70%, placebo 39%), a difference that was still remaining after 12 months (disopyramide 54%, placebo 30%). Twenty-four patients, all relapsing to atrial fibrillation before six months on placebo, were converted to sinus rhythm once again. They were then treated with disopyramide in an open manner and after 12 months 37% were still in sinus rhythm. From the results of this study, disopyramide seems to be a useful drug in maintaining sinus rhythm after electroconversion of atrial fibrillation. In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), the efficacy and safety of two anti-arrhythmic drugs in preventing the recurrence of AF after successful direct current (DC) cardioversion was prospectively assessed in a multi-centre double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial using daily trans-telephonic monitoring.
                1182 patients with persistent AF were prospectively enrolled, 848 patients were successfully cardioverted and then randomised to either sotalol (383 patients), quinidine plus verapamil (377 patients) or placebo (88 patients). The primary outcome parameter was AF recurrence or death. All patients received an event recorder (Tele-ECG) and had to record and transmit via telephone at least one ECG per day during follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 266 days. A total of 191,103 Tele-ECGs were recorded and transmitted. The primary outcome parameter (AF recurrence of any kind or death) was observed in 572 patients (67%) in whom at least one episode of AF recurrence was documented during follow-up, in 348 patients (41%) AF recurrence was persistent. The recurrence rates after one year for any AF were 83% for placebo, 67% for sotalol and 65% for quinidine plus verapamil, the latter being statistically superior to placebo but not different from sotalol. The recurrence rates for the secondary outcome parameter persistent AF were 77%, 49% and 38%, respectively. Quinidine plus verapamil was significantly superior to placebo and to sotalol. About 95% of all AF recurrences were initially detected in the daily Tele-ECG, about 70% of all AF recurrences occurred completely asymptomatic. Adverse events on sotalol and quinidine plus verapamil were comparable with the exception that all torsade de pointes tachycardias occurred on sotalol.
                Anti-arrhythmic treatment after DC cardioversion of persistent AF significantly decreases the recurrence rates of persistent AF compared to placebo with superiority of quinidine plus verapamil compared to sotalol. Symptoms were not reliable as clinical surrogates to detect episodes of AF. Pilsicainide is a newly synthesized antiarrhythmic agent with class Ic properties. Various antiarrhythmic agents have been used to convert atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm or decrease the rate of relapse of AF.
                We randomly assigned 62 patients with chronic AF to oral treatment of either a placebo (10 patients) or 150 mg/day of pilsicainide (52 patients) for 4 weeks before electrical cardioversion. Before oral administration of pilsicainide, 41 patients underwent transesophageal echocardiography to investigate whether there was thrombus formation in the heart chambers. Patients without pharmacologic defibrillation underwent direct current cardioversion to restore sinus rhythm. After successful cardioversion, all patients continued to receive pilsicainide and were monitored for up to 2 years.
                Before cardioversion, 11 patients in the pilsicainide group (21%) reverted to sinus rhythm. No patients in the placebo group reverted to sinus rhythm. Direct current cardioversion was performed in 51 patients; however, 8 patients were not converted to sinus rhythm (5 patients receiving pilsicainide, 3 patients receiving placebo), and 3 patients needed intracardiac cardioversion to convert to sinus rhythm. Asymptomatic bradyarrhythmias were observed in 5 patients in the pilsicainide group. During the follow-up period, 33 patients (71%) in the pilsicainide group remained in sinus rhythm at 1 month; this number decreased to 23 patients (49%) at 3 months, 20 (43%) at 6 months, 16 (34%) at 12 months, 16 (34%) at 18 months, and 16 (34%) at 24 months. All patients receiving placebo continued to receive placebo after the cardioversion, and AF recurred a few days after cardioversion in all cases. No independent discriminant variables were identified in the groups between maintenance and nonmaintenance of sinus rhythm. Although no serious side effects regarding pilsicainide have been documented, one patient died of acute myocardial infarction, most likely not related to pilsicainide administration.
                Pilsicainide is effective in restoring or maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with chronic AF lasting longer than an average duration of 22 months. No major adverse effects were observed. Azimilide hydrochloride (azimilide), an investigational antiarrhythmic drug, has shown variable efficacy in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was designed to assess its efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal AF and heart disease. Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF were screened for 1 month by transtelephonic monitoring. After recording 1 episode of AF in the screening period, they were randomized to receive azimilide 125 mg or placebo once daily. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of congestive heart failure or coronary heart disease (CHF/CHD). A maximum of 220 patients without CHF/CHD were randomized, with the remainder having CHF/CHD. Patients with CHF/CHD were monitored for 3 days during loading. The primary efficacy analysis was the time to the first symptomatic recurrence of AF in the CHF/CHD group. Secondary analyses were the time to the first recurrence in the entire population and the time to the first recurrence in those with significant structural heart disease. The median time to recurrence of AF in the CHF/CHD group was 10 days in the 2 treatment arms. Nonsignificant trends were seen toward efficacy of azimilide in the CHF/CHD group (hazard ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 0.97 to 1.70, p=0.087), structural heart disease group (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.56, p=0.11), and overall group (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.49, p=0.053). No patient died. In conclusion, azimilide showed a nonsignificant trend toward efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF. This study was performed to evaluate, using a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled protocol, the long-term efficacy and safety of propafenone and sotalol in maintaining sinus rhythm after conversion of recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with recurrent AF has several potential benefits, the most important being a reduced risk of thromboembolic events. Three hundred patients with recurrent AF (> or = 4 episodes in the last year) and AF at enrollment lasting < 48 hours were randomized to receive either propafenone (mean daily dose 13 +/- 1.5 mg/kg; 102 patients), sotalol (mean daily dose 3 +/- 0.4 mg/kg; 106 patients), or placebo (92 patients). After 1-year follow-up, Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion of patients remaining in sinus rhythm were comparable between propafenone (63%) and sotalol (73%) and superior to placebo (35%; p = 0.001 vs both drugs). Symptomatic recurrences occurred later with propafenone and sotalol than with placebo. Nine patients (9%) in the propafenone group, 11 (10%) in the sotalol group, and 3 (3%) in the placebo group discontinued therapy due to adverse effects. Malignant nonfatal arrhythmias due to proarrhythmic effects were documented with sotalol only, and occurred < 72 hours from the beginning of therapy in 4 patients (4%). During recurrences, the ventricular rate was significantly reduced in patients taking propafenone and sotalol (p = 0.001 for both drugs vs placebo). The likelihood of remaining in sinus rhythm during follow-up was higher in younger patients with smaller left atrial size and without concomitant heart disease. In patients with recurrent symptomatic AF, propafenone and sotalol are not significantly different from each other and are superior to placebo in maintaining sinus rhythm at 1 year. Recurrences occur later and tend to be less symptomatic with propafenone and sotalol compared with placebo. This open, parallel-group study compares quinidine and sotalol treatment for maintenance of sinus rhythm after direct current conversion of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. The patients from 15 centers in Sweden were randomized to sotalol (98 patients) or quinidine (85 patients) after 2 hours of sinus rhythm after direct current conversion. According to primary efficacy assessment, 52% of the patients in the sotalol group and 48% of the patients in the quinidine group remained in sinus rhythm during the following 6-month treatment period (NS). Furthermore, 34% of the patients treated with sotalol and 22% of the patients treated with quinidine relapsed into atrial fibrillation (NS). Heart rate after relapsing into atrial fibrillation was higher in the patients treated with quinidine (109 beats/min) than in the patients treated with sotalol (78 beats/min, p less than 0.001). Patients treated with sotalol were found to be less symptomatic at the time of relapse compared with relapsing patients in the quinidine group. In terms of safety, more patients were withdrawn from quinidine than from sotalol treatment (26% vs. 11%, p less than 0.05), and sotalol was generally better tolerated than quinidine. Twenty-eight percent of the patients treated with sotalol and 50% of the patients treated with quinidine reported side effects (p less than 0.01). The difference was primarily a result of early (within the first month of treatment) gastrointestinal and skin side effects in the group of patients treated with quinidine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT) commonly occurs shortly after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but ventricular arrhythmias are less documented.
                On the 1st postoperative day, 206 consecutive eligible patients were prospectively randomized to a sotalol group (80 mg b.i.d.; n = 103) or a control group without beta-blockade or antiarrhythmic drugs (n = 103).
                The SVT incidence (predominantly atrial fibrillation) accounted for 16% in the sotalol group versus 48% (p < 0.00001). Multivariate analysis showed that sotalol reduced the SVT incidence (p < 0.00001, odds ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.42), whereas a lower preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.019) and older age (p = 0.031) were independent risk factors of SVT occurrence. The Holter electrocardiographic analysis (24 hours) demonstrated that sotalol (32 versus 92; p = 0.031) decreased the median number of ventricular events, mostly isolated premature ventricular beats. Neither ventricular proarrhythmia effect nor "torsades de pointes" were detected. Despite strict hemodynamic-based selection, sotalol had to be discontinued in 8 patients (7.8%), for reasons related to asthma in 3 or cardiac reasons in 5.
                Oral low-dose sotalol provided considerable and reliable protection in selected nondepressed cardiac function patients, reducing the occurrence of both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias after CABG. Sotalol is a beta-adrenergic blocking drug with the additional property of lengthening the cardiac action potential. These electrophysiologic properties render the drug attractive for use in the prevention of postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias (SVA), and previous studies have suggested that it was indeed effective. The hemodynamic response to sotalol and its safety early after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery were therefore studied. Forty-two patients undergoing CABG were randomly assigned either to receive sotalol to prevent postoperative SVA (25 patients) or to serve as controls (17 patients). Sotalol was started 6 hours after surgery if patients had a cardiac index > 2.8 L/min/m2 with a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure < 15 mmHg, and if they had no contraindications to the use of beta-blockers. The drug was given as a loading infusion of 1 mg/kg over 2 hours, followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.15 mg/kg/h for 24 hours. Three hours later, patients received the first oral dose of 80 mg to be repeated every 8 or 12 hours. Adverse effects necessitating discontinuation of the drug (bradycardia < 50 beats/min, systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, or cardiac index < 2.2 L/min/m2) occurred in six patients (24%) and were mainly related to the loading infusion. The hemodynamic data for patients who completed the study were characterized by a significant fall of the cardiac index caused by a lower heart rate without significant change of the stroke volume index. The incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias was not significantly different in the two groups (3/19 in the sotalol group, 5/17 in the control group).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) This prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy and safety of sotalol and propafenone when used for long-term prevention of atrial fibrillation. For the long-term maintenance of normal sinus rhythm, propafenone seems to be more effective than sotalol. Ninety patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery were studied prospectively by bedside and subsequent ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring to investigate the incidence, possible causes, and prevention of atrial fibrillation. Patients with good left ventricular function were divided randomly into a control group or groups treated with digoxin or propranolol. In the control group the incidence of atrial fibrillation was 27% and of significant ventricular extrasystoles 3%. Propranolol reduced the incidence of atrial fibrillation (14.8%), whereas digoxin had no effect and increased the incidence of ventricular extrasystoles. Age, sex, severity of symptoms, cardiomegaly, heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, and number of grafts did not affect the result. The operative myocardial ischaemic time was related to the occurrence of atrial fibrillation. There was also a significant relation between atrial fibrillation and bundle branch block. Atrial fibrillation is common after coronary artery grafting; it may be due to diffuse myocardial ischaemia or hypothermic injury. The incidence may be reduced by beta blockade. Pharmacologic therapy is widely used for restoration of sinus rhythm and prevention of recurrences of atrial fibrillation. Because concerns have been raised about their potential proarrhythmic effects, therapeutic regimens should be evaluated by placebo-controlled studies to determine their efficacy and safety. One hundred thirty-six patients with persistent atrial fibrillation were randomized to receive propafenone 2 mg/kg over 30 minutes, followed by oral propafenone 150 mg 3 times daily or matching placebo. Nonresponders to intravenous therapy underwent direct-current cardioversion. Both responders to intravenous therapy and converters to sinus rhythm after direct-current cardioversion were followed for 6 months in a double-blind oral treatment period of propafenone 150 mg 3 times daily or matching placebo. Pharmacologic conversion to sinus rhythm was achieved in 29% of the patients taking propafenone and in 17% of patients taking placebo (p > or = 0.10). Subsequent direct-current cardioversion in nonresponders was equally successful (70%) in both groups (p > or = 0.10). The proportion of patients free from recurrent symptomatic arrhythmia at 6 months was 67% for the propafenone and 35% for the placebo group (p < 0.01). Time to atrial fibrillation relapse was more favorable with propafenone than with placebo (p < 0.001). The incidence of drug-related side effects was 10% in the propafenone group and 14% in the placebo group. Thus, "slow" infusion of propafenone seems to be of limited value for terminating atrial fibrillation. Oral propafenone at a low dosage 150 mg 3 times daily is well tolerated and effective in maintaining sinus rhythm for 6 months after pharmacologic or electrical restoration of sinus rhythm. We assessed the efficacy of postoperatively administered oral Sotalol in preventing the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation.
                Subjects were 80 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) randomized alternately into a Sotalol group (40 patients) administered 80 mg of oral Sotalol daily starting on the postoperative day 1 and continued for 14 days, and a control group (40 patients) matched for age and gender.
                The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (21 patients) was significantly lower in the Sotalol group (6/40 patients; 15%) than in controls (15/40; 37.5%) (p < 0.05). Significant bradycardia or hypotension, necessitating drug withdrawal, occurred in 3 of 40 (7.5%) patients in the Sotalol group. None in the Sotalol group developed Torsardes de Pointes or sustained ventricular arrhythmias or other severe side effects. The sinus heart rate increased in both groups but less in the Sotalol group. QT, QRS, and QTc durations did not differ between groups. Postoperative hospital stay did not differ between groups.
                Oral Sotalol administration of 80 mg daily was associated with a significant decrease in postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing CABG without appreciable side effects. Sotalol should thus be considered in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing CABG in the absence of heart failure and significant left ventricular dysfunction. This double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study determined the efficacy and safety of dofetilide in converting atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFl) to sinus rhythm (SR) and maintaining SR for 1 year.
                Patients with AF or AFl (n=325) were randomized to 125, 250, or 500 microgram dofetilide or placebo twice daily. Dosages were adjusted for QTc response and, after 105 patients were enrolled, for calculated creatinine clearance (Cl(Cr)). Pharmacological cardioversion rates for 125, 250, and 500 microgram dofetilide were 6.1%, 9.8%, and 29.9%, respectively, versus 1.2% for placebo (250 and 500 microgram versus placebo; P=0.015 and P<0.001, respectively). Seventy percent of pharmacological cardioversions with dofetilide were achieved in 24 hours and 91% in 36 hours. For the 250 patients who successfully cardioverted pharmacologically or electrically, the probability of remaining in SR at 1 year was 0.40, 0.37, 0.58 for 125, 250, and 500 microgram dofetilide, respectively, and 0.25 for placebo (500 microgram versus placebo, P=0.001). Two cases of torsade de pointes occurred, 1 on day 2 and the other on day 3 (0.8% of all patients given active drug); 1 sudden cardiac death, classified as proarrhythmic, occurred on day 8 (0.4% of all patients given active drug).
                Dofetilide, a new class III antiarrhythmic agent, is moderately effective in cardioverting AF or AFl to SR and significantly effective in maintaining SR for 1 year. In-hospital initiation and dosage adjustment based on QTc and Cl(Cr) are necessary to minimize a small but nonnegligible proarrhythmic risk. Episodes of atrial fibrillation or flutter frequently complicate the postoperative course after coronary bypass surgery. A hundred and one patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were randomized to oral pre- and postoperative treatment with sotalol, a non-selective beta-blocking agent with class-III antiarrhythmic properties (50 patients), or to half the preoperative beta-blocking dose according to the routine of the department (51 patients). Thus, there was no equipotency regarding beta blockade in the two groups. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was 10% in the sotalol group and 29% in the comparison group, p = 0.028. In 10% of the sotalol patients the dose had to be reduced or stopped compared to in none the group given routine treatment. The patients who developed atrial fibrillation were older, but otherwise there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Sotalol was effective in reducing the incidence of atrial fibrillation. However, careful titration of the optimal dose should be performed in order to avoid side effects of the beta blockade. Atrial fibrillation is the most commonly encountered sustained cardiac arrhythmia. Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm is believed by many physicians to be superior to rate control only. However, there are no prospective data that compare both therapeutic strategies.
                The Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF) trial was a randomised trial in 252 patients with atrial fibrillation of between 7 days and 360 days duration, which compared rate (group A, 125 patients) with rhythm control (group B, 127 patients). In group A, diltiazem was used as first-line therapy and amiodarone was used in group B. The primary study endpoint was improvement in symptoms related to atrial fibrillation.
                Over the entire observation period of 1 year, a similar proportion of patients reported improvement in symptoms in both groups (76 responders at 12 months in group A vs 70 responders in group B, p=0.317). Amiodarone administration resulted in pharmacological restoration of sinus rhythm in 23% of patients. Walking distance in a 6 min walk test was better in group B compared with group A, but assessment of quality of life showed no differences between groups. The incidence of hospital admission was higher in group B (87 [69%] out of 127 vs 30 [24%] out of 125 in group A, p=0.001). Adverse drug effects more frequently led to a change in therapy in group B (31 [25%] patients compared with 17 [14%] in group A, p=0.036).
                With respect to symptomatic improvement in patients with atrial fibrillation, the therapeutic strategies of rate versus rhythm control yielded similar clinical results overall. However, exercise tolerance is better with rhythm control, although hospital admission is more frequent. These data may serve as a basis to select therapy in individual patients. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are common after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and may have deleterious hemodynamic consequences. To determine if acebutolol, a cardioselective beta-blocking drug, prevents such tachyarrhythmias after CABG, 100 consecutive patients, aged 30 to 77 years (mean +/- standard deviation 53 +/- 9), were entered into a randomized, controlled study. Exclusion criteria were: contraindications to beta-blocking drugs, left ventricular aneurysm, major renal failure, history of cardiac arrhythmia and cardiac arrhythmia during the immediate postoperative period. From 36 hours after surgery until discharge (usually on the seventh day), 50 patients were given 200 mg of acebutolol (or 400 mg if weight was more than 80 kg) orally twice a day (dosage than modified to maintain a heart rate at rest between 60 and 90 beats/min). The 50 patients in the control group did not receive beta-blocking drugs after CABG. The 2 groups were comparable in angina functional class, ejection fraction, number of diseased vessels, antianginal therapy before CABG, number of bypassed vessels and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass All patients were clinically evaluated twice daily and had continuous electrocardiographic monitoring and daily electrocardiograms. A 24-hour continuous electrocardiogram was recorded in the last 20 patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To investigate the effectiveness and safety of low-dose sotalol (a class III antiarrhythmic beta-blocking agent) in the prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVTs) and to identify predictors for the occurrence of these arrhythmias shortly after coronary artery bypass grafting, 300 consecutive patients were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. Patients with severely depressed left ventricular function or other contraindications for beta blockers were excluded. Beginning at 4 hours and up to the sixth day after surgery, 150 patients received 40 mg of sotalol every 6 hours. SVT was observed in 24 (16%) of 150 low-dose sotalol-and in 49 (33%) of 150 placebo-treated patients [p less than 0.005]. In patients receiving sotalol, atrial fibrillation was the only noted tachyarrhythmia, whereas in the placebo group, 42 (28%) patients had atrial fibrillation, 3 (2%) atrial flutter, 1 (0.7%) atrial tachycardia and 3 (2%) sinus tachycardia. Drug-related adverse effects necessitating discontinuation of the drug were noted in only 2 (1%) sotalol-treated patients and 4 (3%) placebo-treated patients (p = not significant). For both groups, univariate analysis indicated that older age, 1- or 2-vessel coronary artery disease, long bypass (greater than or equal to 150 minutes) and aorta cross-clamp time (greater than or equal to 120 minutes) were predictive variables for the occurrence of SVTs. Multivariate analysis showed that male sex (odds ratio 2.3), 1- or 2-vessel coronary artery disease (odds ratio 2.0) and older age (odds ratio 1.1) were independent risk factors for increased occurrence of postoperative SVT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass graft surgery constitutes the most common sustained arrhythmia and results in many complications. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of prophylactic use of beta-blockers against atrial fibrillation in off-pump surgery patients in the early postoperative period.
                From 2002 to 2005, 78 patients were enrolled and 41 patients received 50 mg metoprolol succinate daily, which was initiated minimum four days before surgery. Preoperative beta-blocking therapy was continued until the morning of surgery. Thirty-seven patients were free of beta-blocker therapy. Esmolol was used within same range of doses in both groups during operations. Both groups received metoprolol succinate following operations. The frequency of AF occurrence was analysed from the operation time to the sixth postoperative day. Results: Sixteen patients developed AF with an overall incidence of 22.5%. Four patients from the study group and three patients from the control group were excluded from the study because of transfer to on-pump surgery. There was no difference with regard to the number of grafts carried out, duration of operations and ventilation, intensive care unit stay and inotropic need among groups. Length of hospital stay did not differ among groups either. There was a higher incidence of postoperative AF in patients without beta-blocker prophylaxis (11.7-32.4% P=0.049).
                Low-dose postoperative beta-adrenergic blockade is valuable for patients who receive these medications before off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting procedures and may be beneficial against AF in all patients. About 30% of patients develop AF after open heart surgery. Biatrial synchronous pacing (BSP) has been shown to promote sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal AF refractory to drug therapy. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to test the effect of BSP via epicardial electrodes on the incidence of AF after heart surgery, as compared to conventional therapy. To apply BSP, we attached two epicardial electrodes to the right and one to the left atrium. Immediately following surgery, BSP was initiated in the AAI-Mode at a rate of 10 beats/min above the underlying rhythm (maximum 110 beats/min) and continued for 3 days, during which the rhythm was continually monitored. After 21 (age 63 +/- 9 years) of the planned 200 patients, the study was prematurely aborted because of the proarrhythmic effect of BSP: 6 of the 12 patients treated with BSP developed sensing failure (P amplitude < 1 mV), which provoked AF in 5 of these 6 patients. BSP was discontinued due to diaphragmal stimulation in two patients and due to ventricular stimulation by a dislocated left atrial electrode in one patient. Two patients in the control group (n = 9) developed AF. Using the available standard technology, BSP via epicardial electrodes is not suitable to suppress AF after heart surgery, primarily due to postoperative deterioration of atrial sensing and its profibrillatory effect. In patients requiring atrial pacing after heart surgery, sensing thresholds must be closely monitored to prevent induction of AF. To compare the efficacy and safety of amiodarone and propafenone when used for the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm in patients with refractory AF.
                Prospective, randomized, single-blind trial.
                Tertiary cardiac referral center.
                One hundred forty-six consecutive patients (72 men; mean age, 63 +/- 10 years [+/- SD]) with recurrent symptomatic AF.
                We studied 146 patients after restoration of sinus rhythm; patients were randomized to amiodarone, 200 mg/d, or propafenone, 450 mg/d. Follow-up clinical evaluations were conducted at the first, second, fourth, and sixth months, and at 3-month intervals thereafter. The proportion of patients relapsing to AF and/or experiencing side effects was calculated for each group using the Kaplan-Meier method. End point of the study was recurrence of AF or occurrence of side effects necessitating discontinuation of medication. Measurements and results: Of 146 patients, 72 received amiodarone and 74 received propafenone. The two groups were clinically similar. Of the 72 patients receiving amiodarone, AF developed in 25 patients, after an average of 9.8 months, compared to 33 of the 74 patients receiving propafenone after an average of 3.8 months. Twelve patients receiving amiodarone and 2 patients receiving propafenone had side effects necessitating withdrawal of medication while still in sinus rhythm.
                Amiodarone tends to be more effective than propafenone in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF, but this advantage is offset by a higher incidence of side effects. To assess the effectiveness of metoprolol in preventing clinically detectable atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
                An open, randomized study was carried out to treat 200 patients who had undergone isolated CABG surgery with extracorporeal circulation. The patients were randomized to either receive metoprolol orally or not to receive the medication in the postoperative period. The outcomes were the detection of sustained atrial AF and flutter, which were symptomatic or required treatment. The patients with the following characteristics were excluded from the study: baseline left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%; previous AF; history of bronchospasm; second- and third-degree atrioventricular blocks, low cardiac output, and heart failure.
                Arrhythmias occurred in 11 out of 100 patients in the metoprolol group and in 24 out of 100 patients in the control group (P=0.02). The relative risk (RR) was 0.46 (95% CI = 0.24-0.88), and the number necessary to treat (NNT) and avoid the outcome was 8 patients. AF was the arrhythmia most frequently observed (30/35). In 38 patients aged 70 years or more, the arrhythmias occurred in 2 out of 19 patients in the metoprolol group and in 10 out of 19 patients in the control group (c2 Yates: P=0.01). The relative risk was 0.20 (95% CI = 0.05-0.79) and the number necessary to treat was 2 patients.
                Metoprolol is effective in preventing AF and flutter in the postoperative period of CABG surgery, and this effect was more evident in the group of elderly patients. Treatment of atrial fibrillation remains a major clinical challenge owing to the limited efficacy and safety of anti-arrhythmic drugs, particularly in patients with structural heart disease.
                To evaluate the efficacy of azimilide, a new class III anti-arrhythmic drug, we studied 658 patients with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation, adequate anticoagulant therapy, and planned electrical cardioversion. Patients were randomized to placebo, azimilide (125 mg o.d.), or sotalol (160 mg b.i.d.). Primary efficacy analysis was based on event recurrence, which was defined as atrial fibrillation lasting>24 h, or requiring DC cardioversion. Median time to recurrence was 14 days for azimilide, 12 days for placebo, and 28 days for sotalol (P=0.0320 when comparing azimilide with placebo; P=0.0002 when comparing azimilide with sotalol). The placebo-to-azimilide hazard ratio was 1.291 (95% CI: 1.022-1.629) and the sotalol-to-azimilide hazard ratio was 0.652 (95% CI: 0.523-0.814). Adverse events causing patient withdrawal were more frequent (P<0.01) in patients on azimilide (12.3%) and on sotalol (13.9%) than on placebo (5.4%). Eight patients in the sotalol (3.5%) and 16 in the azimilide (7.6%) group interrupted the study because of QTc prolongation. Torsade de pointes was reported in five patients of the azimilide group. The percentage of patients who completed the 26 week study period without events were 19% for azimilide, 15% for placebo, and 33% for sotalol (P<0.01). Unsuccessful day 4 cardioversion, arrhythmia recurrence, and adverse events were the main causes of withdrawal from the study.
                This study demonstrates that the anti-arrhythmic efficacy of azimilide is slightly superior to placebo but significantly inferior to sotalol in patients with persistent AF. The modest anti-arrhythmic efficacy and high rate of torsade de pointes and marked QTc prolongation limit azimilide utilization for the treatment of AF. The present study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a specific algorithm with continuous atrial dynamic overdrive pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
                Atrial fibrillation occurs in 30% to 40% of patients after cardiac surgery with a peak incidence on the second day. It still represents a challenge for postoperative prevention and treatment and may have medical and cost implications.
                Ninety-six consecutive patients undergoing CABG for severe coronary artery disease and in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy on the second postoperative day were randomized to have or not 24 h of atrial pacing through temporary epicardial wires using a permanent dynamic overdrive algorithm. Holter ECGs recorded the same day in both groups were analyzed to detect AF occurrence.
                No difference was observed in baseline data between the two study groups, particularly for age, male gender, history of AF, ventricular function, severity of coronary artery disease, preoperative beta-adrenergic blocking agent therapy or P-wave duration. The incidence of AF was significantly lower (p = 0.036) in the paced group (10%) compared with control subjects (27%). Multivariate analysis showed AF incidence to increase with age (p = 0.051) but not in patients with pacing (p = 0.078). It decreased with a better left ventricular ejection fraction only in conjunction with atrial pacing (p = 0.018).
                We conclude that continuous atrial pacing with an algorithm for dynamic overdrive reduces significantly incidence of AF the second day after CABG surgery, particularly in patients with preserved left ventricular function. The efficacy and safety of flecainide were studied in the maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion for chronic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Eighty-one patients were randomized to flecainide treatment or no treatment. Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. Compared to previous studies, patients could be classified as difficult-to-treat patients. Multiple regression analysis showed New York Heart Association class I for exercise tolerance (p = 0.0004) and flecainide treatment (p = 0.01) to be the main factors increasing the arrhythmia-free episode. However, Mantel-Cox lifetable analysis did not reveal significant differences between arrhythmia-free survival curves of both treatment groups. In the flecainide-treated group, 9% of patients experienced side effects, mostly related to negative dromotropic effects. The incidence of ventricular proarrhythmia in this group of patients was low. Thus, flecainide may be effective in postponing arrhythmia recurrence, even in difficult-to-treat patients. Caution should be excercised in treating patients with underlying conduction disturbances, sick sinus syndrome or characteristics favoring development of ventricular proarrhythmia. In patients with left ventricular dysfunction, atrial fibrillation and flutter (AF and AFl, respectively) are common arrhythmias associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The present study investigated the potential of dofetilide in AF-AFl patients with left ventricular dysfunction to restore and maintain sinus rhythm, which might reduce mortality and hospitalizations.
                In the Danish Investigations of Arrhythmia and Mortality ON Dofetilide (DIAMOND) studies, 506 patients were in AF-AFl at baseline. Over the course of study, cardioversion occurred in 148 (59%) dofetilide- and 86 (34%) placebo-treated patients. In these patients, the probability of maintaining sinus rhythm for 1 year was 79% with dofetilide versus 42% with placebo (P<0.001). Dofetilide had no effect on all-cause mortality, but restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm was associated with significant reduction in mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.64; P<0.0001). In addition, dofetilide therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk ratio versus placebo for either all-cause (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.89; P</=0.005) or congestive heart failure (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.93; P</=0.02) rehospitalization.
                Dofetilide is safe and increases the probability of obtaining and maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with structural heart disease. The present study suggests that restoration of sinus rhythm is associated with improved survival. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to assess the efficacy of preoperatively and postoperatively administered oral d,l sotalol in preventing the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF).
                Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia following coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). Its etiology, prevention and treatment remain highly controversial. Furthermore, its associated morbidity results in a prolongation of the length of hospital stay post-CABG.
                A total of 85 patients, of which 73 were to undergo CABG and 12 CABG plus valvular surgery (ejection fraction > or = 28% and absence of clinical heart failure), were randomized to receive either sotalol (40 patients; mean dose = 190 +/- 43 mg/day) started 24 to 48 h before open heart surgery and continued for four days postoperatively, or placebo (45 patients, mean dose = 176 +/- 32 mg/day).
                Atrial fibrillation occurred in a total of 22/85 (26%) patients. The incidence of postoperative AF was significantly (p = 0.008) lower in patients on sotalol (12.5%) as compared with placebo (38%). Significant bradycardia/hypotension, necessitating drug withdrawal, occurred in 2 of 40 (5%) patients on sotalol and none in the placebo group (p = 0.2). None of the patients on sotalol developed Torsade de pointes or sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Postoperative mortality was not significantly different in sotalol versus placebo (0% vs. 2%, p = 1.0). Patients in the sotalol group had a nonsignificantly shorter length of hospital stay as compared with placebo (7 +/- 2 days vs. 8 +/- 4 days; p = 0.24).
                The administration of sotalol, in dosages ranging from 80 to 120 mg, was associated with a significant decrease (67%) in postoperative AF in patients undergoing CABG without appreciable side effects. Sotalol should be considered for the prevention of postoperative AF in patients undergoing CABG in the absence of heart failure and significant left ventricular dysfunction. Aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of flecainide (F) and sotalol (S) for the prevention of recurrences of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).
                Sixty-six patients with PAF (> or = 3 episodes of atrial fibrillation in the last year) in sinus rhythm, were randomized to pharmacological oral treatment with F (20 patients-Group A), with S (20 patients-Group B) and placebo (P) (26 patients-Group C). During the follow-up (one year duration) were evaluated on I, III, VI and XII months the number and tolerance of the atrial fibrillation recurrences, cardiac and/or noncardiac side effects. The patients with more than two recurrences in the same follow-up interval withdrew from the study. In each patient 14 clinical and laboratory variables were evaluated.
                After 12 months were arrhythmia-free respectively 70% of Group A patients, 60% of Group B patients, 27% of Group C patients. Univariate analysis showed that treatment with F was related to decrease of atrial fibrillation recurrences (one recurrence 67%, two recurrences 81%, three recurrences 81%), treatment with S was related to decrease of recurrences (two recurrences 59%); the variable most significantly related to the risk of arrhythmia recurrence is the higher value of basal cardiac rate (one recurrence t = 2.15, two t = 2.22, three t = 2.96, four t = 2.06). There was not statistically significant difference in maintenance of sinus rhythm at the end of the follow-up between the groups of patients on F and S (p = 0.163); treatment efficacy was significantly higher than P (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment with F and S decreases the risk of arrhythmia recurrence respectively of 85% and 76% versus placebo at the end of the follow-up. The incidence of cardiac and/or noncardiac side effects was not clinically significant.
                F and S are both effective and safe for prevention of PAF, with 70% and 60% respectively of patients arrhythmia-free after 12 months of treatment. Side effects were common, but clinically significant adverse events were uncommon. A higher value of basal cardiac rate was predictive of atrial fibrillation recurrences in the patients during treatment. Multiple trials have suggested the use of digoxin, digoxin and propranolol, or timolol to prevent atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. No trial has evaluated the efficacy of digoxin verus propranolol. Furthermore, the predictors of postoperative atrial fibrillation and the long-term consequence of atrial fibrillation that reverts to sinus rhythm have not been established. One hundred fifty patients were randomized to receive no drug, propranolol (20 mg every 6 hours), or digoxin (0.5 mg followed by 0.25 mg daily). Twenty-seven patients were excluded from data analysis. In the remaining 123 patients, no preoperative parameter (age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, electrocardiographic p wave morphology, or preoperative digoxin or propranolol therapy), intraoperative parameter (bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, or number of vessels bypassed), or postoperative parameter (peak creatinine kinase, congestive heart failure, or pericarditis) by univariate or multivariate analysis predicted patients at risk for atrial fibrillation. Sustained atrial fibrillation developed in 37.5% of control and 32.6% of digoxin-treated patients. Only 16.2% of propranolol-treated patients had sustained atrial fibrillation (p less than 0.03). There were no in-hospital complications in those patients with atrial fibrillation. After 26 +/- 7 months follow-up, those patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation had no increased incidence of angina, cerebral vascular accident, myocardial infarction, or sudden death. Therefore, in this select population, propranolol prophylaxis is effective but discretionary. nan This study sought to determine whether ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) after antral pulmonary vein isolation (APVI) further improves the clinical outcome of APVI in patients with long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).
                Ablation of CFAEs has been reported to eliminate persistent AF. However, residual pulmonary vein arrhythmogenicity is a common mechanism of recurrence.
                In this randomized study, 119 consecutive patients (mean age 60 +/- 9 years) with long-lasting persistent AF underwent APVI with an irrigated-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter. Antral pulmonary vein isolation resulted in termination of AF in 19 of 119 patients (Group A, 16%). The remaining 100 patients who still were in AF were randomized to no further ablation and underwent cardioversion (Group B, n = 50) or to ablation of CFAEs in the left atrium or coronary sinus for up to 2 additional hours of procedure duration (Group C, n = 50).
                Atrial fibrillation terminated during ablation of CFAEs in 9 of 50 patients (18%) in Group C. At 10 +/- 3 months after a single ablation procedure, 18 of 50 (36%) in Group B and 17 of 50 (34%) in Group C were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs (p = 0.84). In Group A, 15 of 19 patients (79%) were in sinus rhythm. A repeat ablation procedure was performed in 34 of 100 randomized patients (for AF in 30 and atrial flutter in 4). At 9 +/- 4 months after the final procedure, 34 of 50 (68%) in Group B and 30 of 50 (60%) in Group C were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs (p = 0.40).
                Up to 2 h of additional ablation of CFAEs after APVI does not appear to improve clinical outcomes in patients with long-lasting persistent AF. Atrial flutter (AFL) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist in the same patient. Recently it has been demonstrated that the triggers for both AF and AFL may originate in the pulmonary veins (PVs). We hypothesized that in patients with both AF and typical AFL, pulmonary vein-left atrial junction (PV-LAJ) disconnection may eliminate both arrhythmias.
                Consecutive patients with documented symptomatic AF and typical AFL were randomly assigned to have PV-LAJ disconnection combined with cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation (group 1, n=49) or PV-LAJ disconnection alone (group 2, n=59). Within the first 8 weeks after ablation, 32 of the group 2 patients had typical AFL documented, whereas none was seen in group 1. Twenty of these 32 converted to sinus rhythm after initiating antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Twelve were cardioverted, and AADs were started. After 8 weeks, all AADS were stopped, and only 3 patients continued to have recurrent sustained typical AFL that was eliminated by CTI ablation. Beyond 8 weeks of follow-up, 7 patients in group 1 and 6 patients in group 2 (14% and 11%, respectively) continued to have AF. Ten of these 13 patients underwent a repeat PV-LAJ disconnection procedure and were cured. The remaining 3 remained in normal sinus rhythm while taking AADs.
                In patients with both AFL and AF, PV-LAJ disconnection alone may be sufficient to control both arrhythmias. CTI block reduced early postablation recurrence of arrhythmias, which in the majority of patients reflects a short-term clinical problem. To determine whether restarting of Beta Blocker following cardiac surgery would reduce the incidence and the severity of post-operative atrial fibrillation (AF).
                210 patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to control (C) (n = 105) and Beta Blockers (BB) (n = 105) groups. Preoperatively all patients were on one type or another of betablockers. Postoperatively only the (BB) group received the medication. Both groups were well matched and had the same cardioplegic technique.
                It was found that; (1) post op (AF) developed in 40 patients of group (C) and in 18 patients of group (BB) P value < 0.02. (2) 73% of (AF) patients in group (C) and 81% in group (BB) were older than 70 years of age. (3) 76% of the (AF) in (BB) group versus 43% in (C) group were converted to sinus rhythm or to a stable controlled rhythm within 24 h or less. P value < 0.01.
                The results indicate that restarting the Beta Blockers in the post-operative period after coronary bypass grafts significantly control the incidence and the severity of atrial fibrillation. Also it confirms the strong relation between the older age and (AF) occurrence. There are two approaches to the treatment of atrial fibrillation: one is cardioversion and treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs to maintain sinus rhythm, and the other is the use of rate-controlling drugs, allowing atrial fibrillation to persist. In both approaches, the use of anticoagulant drugs is recommended.
                We conducted a randomized, multicenter comparison of these two treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of stroke or death. The primary end point was overall mortality.
                A total of 4060 patients (mean [+/-SD] age, 69.7+/-9.0 years) were enrolled in the study; 70.8 percent had a history of hypertension, and 38.2 percent had coronary artery disease. Of the 3311 patients with echocardiograms, the left atrium was enlarged in 64.7 percent and left ventricular function was depressed in 26.0 percent. There were 356 deaths among the patients assigned to rhythm-control therapy and 310 deaths among those assigned to rate-control therapy (mortality at five years, 23.8 percent and 21.3 percent, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.15 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.34]; P=0.08). More patients in the rhythm-control group than in the rate-control group were hospitalized, and there were more adverse drug effects in the rhythm-control group as well. In both groups, the majority of strokes occurred after warfarin had been stopped or when the international normalized ratio was subtherapeutic.
                Management of atrial fibrillation with the rhythm-control strategy offers no survival advantage over the rate-control strategy, and there are potential advantages, such as a lower risk of adverse drug effects, with the rate-control strategy. Anticoagulation should be continued in this group of high-risk patients.
                Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication reported in 20% to 40% of patients after coronary operations. Sotalol alone and magnesium alone have been shown to partially decrease the incidence of AF. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of these two pharmacological agents, used alone or in combination, to reduce postoperative AF.
                Two hundred seven consecutive coronary artery bypass patients (mean age 62 +/- 11 years) were randomized to receive sotalol alone (80 mg twice daily for 5 days starting from the morning of the first postoperative day) (group S), magnesium alone (1.5 g daily for 6 days starting in the operating room just before cardiopulmonary bypass) (group M), both pharmacologic agents at the same dosages (group S+M), or no antiarrhythmic agents (group CTR). All patients with an ejection fraction less than 0.40 were excluded.
                The incidence of postoperative AF was 11.8% (6/51) in the S group, 14.8% (8/54) in the M group, 1.9% (1/52) in the S+M group, and 38% (19/50) in the CTR group. The following differences were significant: group CTR versus groups S, M, and S+M with values of p = 0.002, p = 0.007 and p < 0.0001, respectively; and group S+M versus groups S and M with p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively.
                Incidence of AF after coronary operation was significantly reduced by the administration of sotalol alone and magnesium alone; more importantly, the incidence was further reduced by combining these agents. In order to compare the efficacy in preventing recurrencies of symptomatic atrial fibrillation of amiodarone (A.) and slow release disopyramide (D.RET.), 76 consecutive patients with recent onset atrial fibrillation (1 to 24 hrs.) were enrolled. In 20 (26%) conversion to sinus rhythm was obtained by electrical cardioversion, and in 56 (74%) by oral quinidine loading. Forty-one patients (group A) were assigned at random to treatment with D.RET. (250 mg twice daily) and 35 patients (group B) to amiodarone treatment (1200 mg daily for 10 days, and subsequently 200 mg daily). The two groups were similar as to age, sex and cardiac pathology. Patients were followed as to clinical condition, standard and dynamic ECG after one and three months and every three months subsequently for an average of 13.2 months (group A) and 14.1 months (group B). Six group A patients (14%) were excluded from follow-up on account of side effects which arose during the first week of treatment. Crises of symptomatic atrial fibrillation occurred in 20 patients of group A (57%) and in 11 (32%) group patients; this difference is statistically significant (p less than 0.05). Four (10%) group A patients stopped taking the drug due to side effects of an anticholinergic type, and three (8.5%) patients developed hyperthyroidism during follow-up. The authors therefore come to the conclusion that amiodarone is more effective than slow-release disopyramide in preventing recurrencies of atrial fibrillation; besides untoward side effects are less frequent with amiodarone.
Several class IA, IC and III drugs, as well as class II (beta-blockers), are moderately effective in maintaining sinus rhythm after conversion of atrial fibrillation. However, they increase adverse events, including pro-arrhythmia, and some of them (disopyramide, quinidine and sotalol) may increase mortality. Possible benefits on clinically relevant outcomes (stroke, embolisms, heart failure) remain to be established.