A randomised placebo controlled trial of loop diuretics in moderate/severe pre-eclampsia, following delivery. Supplementary calcium in prevention of pre-eclampsia. Treatment of hypertension in patients with pre-eclampsia: a prospective parallel-group study comparing dihydralazine with urapidil.
Nineteen patients with pre-eclampsia were randomised to receive 40 mg of frusemide or placebo by mouth daily for 7 days in the first post-partum week. Outcome measures included mean and maximum blood pressure, the need for additional antihypertensive treatment during that period and mean length of hospital stay. There were no statistically significant differences in outcome between the treatment and placebo groups although there was a trend to more rapid lowering of blood pressure following delivery in those receiving frusemide. To study the effect of calcium supplementation on reduction of pre-eclampsia in Iranian women at high risk of pre-eclampsia.
                Thirty pregnant women at high risk of developing pre-eclampsia were randomized to 2 g of daily calcium and placebo. Subjects and investigators were blinded to treatment allocation. The inclusion criteria were positive rollover test, having at least one risk factor for pre-eclampsia, between 28 and 32 weeks of pregnancy, and blood pressure less than 140/90 (mm Hg). Exclusion criteria were having any chronic condition. Pre-eclampsia was defined as systolic/diastolic blood pressure over 140/90 plus proteinuria. All the subjects were followed up to delivery.
                A sevenfold reduction in the occurrence of pre-eclamsia were seen among the calcium group compared with the placebo group (7 out of 15 developed pre-eclampsia in control group vs. 1 out of 15 in calcium group, P=0.014). No major effect on pregnancy induced hypertension was seen (66% in placebo and 76% in calcium group developed hypertension) but the onset of hypertension was delayed 3 weeks in the calcium group. A longer duration of pregnancy was seen in calcium than placebo (mean+/-S.D.=37+/-2 for calcium and 34+/-2 for placebo, P<0.05). Infants born to the calcium group, on average, were 552 g heavier than infants born to the placebo group, P<0.05.
                Calcium supplementation is beneficial for preventing pre-eclampsia among Iranian women at high risk of developing pre-eclampsia. The primary objective of treatment in women with severe hypertension and pre-eclampsia is to prevent complications such as encephalopathy and haemorrhage. In many countries dihydralazine is considered the drug of choice for treating hypertension in pregnancy, because it now has been used safely for about 30 years, and the introduction of a new drug in pregnancy is a difficult task with partially unknown hazards. In some other countries combined alpha- and beta-blockers are also used. Taking into account that some patients with pre-eclampsia do not respond to dihydralazine and the drug has serious side-effects like headache and reflex tachycardia, there is some need for developing alternative treatment strategies using drugs that are more adequate for pregnancy than dihydralazine.
                Urapidil is a post-synaptic alpha 1 adrenoceptor antagonist, which is widely used to control hypertensive crises unrelated to pregnancy. Since it is known that pre-eclampsia is associated with increased sympathetic activity, administration of an alpha 1 adrenoceptor antagonist provides a reasonable therapeutic basis. So far there is only one report describing the i.v. use of urapidil in the treatment of hypertension in pregnancy unresponsive to dihydralazine and one report which describes the oral use of urapidil. In an earlier pilot study we examined the dose range for i.v. application of urapidil necessary for adequate blood pressure control in patients with pre-eclampsia. In the present randomized controlled study 26 white women with pre-eclampsia and hypertension in pregnancy were included. Treatment was not blinded. During the initial period of intensive intravenous treatment all subjects were under constant surveillance by a physician and a nurse.
                Effective prolonged control of blood pressure (values below 150/100 mmHg) was achieved in all patients of the two groups. In one patient of the dihydralazine group signs of lightheadedness and near syncope were noted. After this side-effect of dihydralazine the patient was treated with urapidil. At the end of the observation period the maternal heart rate in the dihydralazine group was higher than in the urapidil group.
                Since urapidil decreased the high blood pressure in patients with pre-eclampsia without serious side-effects urapidil appears preferable superior to dihydralazine. The haemodynamic effects of urapidil were more predictable than those of dihydralazine. The reduction of intracerebral pressure could be an additional advantage of urapidil in the treatment of patients with pre-eclampsia.
There is insufficient evidence to draw reliable conclusions about the effects of diuretics on prevention of pre-eclampsia and its complications. However, from this review, no clear benefits have been found from the use of diuretics to prevent pre-eclampsia. Taken together with the level of adverse effects found, the use of diuretics for the prevention of pre-eclampsia and its complications cannot be recommended.