[Parenteral S-adenosylmethionine compared to placebos in the treatment of alcoholic liver diseases]. Low-dose methotrexate is ineffective in primary biliary cirrhosis: long-term results of a placebo-controlled trial. S-adenosylmethionine in alcoholic liver cirrhosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. [Treatment of alcoholic hepatitis with silymarin. A double-blind comparative study in 116 patients].
The improvements in the knowledge of the action of ethanol over the hepatic cell, its direct action over the cell, and the intracytoplasmatic structures membranes, point out the possibilities of use of sulfo-adenosil-L-metionina (SAMe); as an util drug inn the treatment of the altered metilation reactions, that take place in those membranes, facilitating their physiological functions. The primary end point in this study was to demonstrate the therapeutic worth os SAMe, by parenteral route in 45 patients with alcoholic liver disease, which were determined by clinical laboratory and hepatic function test, label qith 32 points or more of the discriminatory function index. Divided into two groups, placebo-SAMe, randomized, double blind. As well as total plasmatic and reduced glutation and lipoperoxidation index, indirect form as malondehaldehyde. Were determined at the first visit anf after 8 and 15 days of treatment. Comparing the results of both groups there were a significative favorable results for the group treatment with SAMe and this confirms the utility of this drug in the treatment of patients with alcoholic liver disease with a discriminatory function index (Maddrey index), of 32 points or more. New treatments for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) need to be evaluated. We conducted a single-center double-blind, randomized trial of methotrexate, 7.5 mg/wk (n = 30), vs. placebo (n = 30) for up to 6 years in PBC.
                Methods included three monthly symptom assessment and liver function tests and liver biopsy and gastroscopy at baseline, after 2 years, and after 4-6 years.
                Patients randomized to methotrexate had, compared with patients randomized to placebo, (1) significantly lower on-treatment serum alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, immunoglobulin (Ig) M, IgG, and (after 24 months) aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels (P < 0.02-0.001 by analysis of covariance to adjust for baseline differences); (2) a nonsignificant trend toward lower on-treatment pruritus scores; (3) similar on-treatment Knodell inflammatory scores but nonsignificant trends toward lower Knodell fibrosis score and less ductopenia; (4) a trend toward greater increases in serum bilirubin level and Mayo score with time (both significant after 5 years of follow-up); and (5) a 2.9-fold (95% confidence interval, 0.85-10.25-fold) increase the rate of death or liver transplantation as a result of liver disease during or after the trial (P = 0.09) in a Cox multivariate regression analysis compared with patients randomized to placebo.
                These results do not support the clinical use of low-dose methotrexate in PBC. The efficacy of S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) in the treatment of liver cell injury has been demonstrated in several experimental models. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of AdoMet treatment in human alcoholic liver cirrhosis.
                A randomized, double-blind trial was performed in 123 patients treated with AdoMet (1200 mg/day, orally) or placebo for 2 years. All patients had alcoholic cirrhosis, and histologic confirmation of the diagnosis was available in 84% of the cases. Seventy-five patients were in Child class A, 40 in class B, and 8 in class C. Sixty-two patients received AdoMet and 61 received placebo.
                At inclusion into the trial no significant differences were observed between the two groups with respect to sex, age, previous episodes of major complications of cirrhosis, Child classification and liver function tests. The overall mortality/liver transplantation at the end of the trial decreased from 30% in the placebo group to 16% in the AdoMet group, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.077). When patients in Child C class were excluded from the analysis, the overall mortality/liver transplantation was significantly greater in the placebo group than in the AdoMet group (29% vs. 12%, p = 0.025), and differences between the two groups in the 2-year survival curves (defined as the time to death or liver transplantation) were also statistically significant (p = 0.046).
                The present results indicate that long-term treatment with AdoMet may improve survival or delay liver transplantation in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis, especially in those with less advanced liver disease. A randomized double-blind trial of silymarin versus placebo was carried out in 116 patients with histologically proven alcoholic hepatitis, 58 of them with cirrhosis. Patients were not included in case of hepatic encephalopathy, contraindication to percutaneous liver biopsy, hepatocellular carcinoma, evident lack of discipline or refusal to enter the trial. Fifty-seven patients received silymarin orally 420 mg/day and 59 received placebo during 3 months. Biologic parameters were assessed in the serum, and a percutaneous liver biopsy was obtained at the start of the trial and 3 months later. Histologic scores of alcoholic hepatitis and fibrosis were established on each biopsy specimen by two independent pathologists. The 2 groups were comparable at inclusion; 26 p. 100 of patients were lost to follow-up at 3 months, abstinence was obtained in 46 p. 100 of patients at the end of the trial. These percentages were similar in the two groups. Four patients died of hepatic failure during the trial, 3 in the placebo group. Significant improvement in the score of alcoholic hepatitis and serum amino transferase activity, was noted in both groups during the trial, irrespective of treatment with silymarin or placebo. No side-effects were noted. Our results suggest that silymarin 420 mg/d is not clinically relevant in the treatment of moderate alcoholic hepatitis.
We could not find evidence supporting or refuting the use of SAMe for patients with alcoholic liver diseases. We need more long-term, high-quality randomised trials on SAMe for these patients before SAMe may be recommended for clinical practice.