Vaginal clindamycin and oral metronidazole for bacterial vaginosis: a randomized trial. Bacterial vaginosis: treatment with clindamycin cream versus oral metronidazole. Efficacy of clindamycin vaginal cream versus oral metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Clindamycin vaginal cream versus oral metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a prospective double-blind clinical trial. Clindamycin versus metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Antimicrobial resistance associated with the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Multicenter comparison of clotrimazole vaginal tablets, oral metronidazole, and vaginal suppositories containing sulfanilamide, aminacrine hydrochloride, and allantoin in the treatment of symptomatic trichomoniasis. Treatment options for bacterial vaginosis in patients at high risk of preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes. A pilot study of metronidazole vaginal gel versus oral metronidazole for the treatment of Trichomonas vaginalis vaginitis. Clinical study comparing probiotic Lactobacillus GR-1 and RC-14 with metronidazole vaginal gel to treat symptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Changes in the vaginal microenvironment with metronidazole treatment for bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of single-dose intravaginal versus single-dose oral metronidazole in the treatment of trichomonal vaginitis. Augmentation of antimicrobial metronidazole therapy of bacterial vaginosis with oral probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14: randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Local treatment of bacterial vaginosis with a bioadhesive metronidazole tablet. A new approach for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: use of polyhexamethylene biguanide. A prospective, randomized study. Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent post-abortal upper genital tract infection in women with bacterial vaginosis: randomised controlled trial. Placebo-controlled trial of intravaginal clindamycin 2% cream for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. A double-blind treatment study of bacterial vaginosis with normal vaginal lactobacilli after an open treatment with vaginal clindamycin ovules. Prospective randomised trial of metronidazole versus vancomycin for Clostridium-difficile-associated diarrhoea and colitis. Cefminox versus metronidazole plus gentamicin intra-abdominal infections: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
To compare the efficacy and safety of clindamycin vaginal ovules with oral metronidazole for treatment of bacterial vaginosis.
                Women with bacterial vaginosis received either 100-mg ovules of clindamycin (intravaginally for 3 consecutive days) plus placebo capsules (orally twice daily for 7 days) or metronidazole 500 mg (two 250-mg capsules orally twice daily for 7 days) plus placebo ovules (intravaginally for 3 consecutive days). The sample was determined prospectively to provide a probability of.84 of correctly concluding that the rate of success for clindamycin is not more than 15% less than the expected 75% success rate for metronidazole. Clinical outcome was determined on the basis of vaginal fluid amine odor and clue cells.
                Of the 399 patients enrolled, 233 could be evaluated for efficacy. Of those, 77 (68.1%) of 113 patients were cured with clindamycin, compared with 80 (66. 7%) of 120 who were cured with metronidazole (95% confidence interval -10.6%, 13.4%; P =.810). Treatment-related adverse events were reported more frequently in the metronidazole treatment group. Systemic symptoms, such as nausea and taste perversion, accounted for most of the difference between groups.
                A 3-day regimen of clindamycin, given as intravaginal ovules, was as effective as and better tolerated than a 7-day regimen of oral metronidazole 500 mg, given twice daily, for treatment of bacterial vaginosis. In a randomized, double-blind study, 48 women with symptomatic bacterial vaginosis were assigned to receive either 5 g of 2% clindamycin vaginal cream daily or 500 mg metronidazole oral tablets twice a day for 7 days. After completion of therapy, there was no significant difference in cure rates (clindamycin 72% versus metronidazole 87%). One month later, 61% of the patients in each group were still cured. Adverse reactions were mild in both groups. We conclude that clindamycin cream is a safe, well tolerated, and effective alternative to oral metronidazole for treatment of bacterial vaginosis. To compare the efficacy and tolerance with 2% clindamycin vaginal cream versus oral metronidazole for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis.
                This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study in which patients were randomly assigned to one of the following two regimens in a 1:1 ratio: clindamycin phosphate vaginal cream 2% (5 g intravaginally at bedtime for 7 days) plus two placebo capsules (twice a day for 7 days) or metronidazole 500 mg (two 250-mg capsules orally twice a day for 7 days) plus placebo vaginal cream (5 g intravaginally at bedtime for 7 days). The patients were seen for follow-up at 5-10 days and 25-39 days after completion of therapy.
                Seven investigators, four in Germany, two in Austria, and one in Switzerland, enrolled 407 patients. Four patients never received either protocol drug, leaving 403 evaluable for safety. Two hundred thirty-four patients were evaluable for efficacy. The analysis for all evaluable patients showed no significant difference between treatment groups. The cure or improvement rate at 1 month after therapy was 83% in the clindamycin group versus 78% in the metronidazole group. The incidence of drug-related adverse medical events was approximately 12% in both groups.
                Oral metronidazole and intravaginal clindamycin cream had a similar efficacy of 78 to 83%. Both drugs were tolerated, with vaginal candidiasis developing in 8.5 and 4.7% of the patients in the clindamycin and metronidazole groups, respectively. Bacterial vaginosis is common among patients seen by gynecologists. Several types of therapy have been proposed. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was to examine the efficacy of clindamycin vaginal cream for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Sixty patients with symptoms of bacterial vaginosis were randomized into the study, and 46 completed the protocol. Twenty-three patients received 2% clindamycin vaginal cream (5 g applied intravaginally at bedtime for 7 days), with placebo oral tablets twice daily for 7 days. The other 23 patients received oral metronidazole tablets (500 mg twice a day for 7 days) and placebo vaginal cream (5 g intravaginally for 7 days). The cure rates for the two regimens were comparable. Twenty-two (97%) of the patients treated with clindamycin vaginal cream had improvement or cure at the first follow-up visit versus 19 (83%) of those taking metronidazole. There was no statistically significant difference between the two results. Side effects for both regimens were comparable. We conclude that 2% clindamycin vaginal cream offers similar efficacy and safety to standard oral metronidazole therapy for bacterial vaginosis. One hundred forty-three women with complaints of vaginitis were assigned to receive either 500 mg of metronidazole twice daily for 7 days or clindamycin 300 mg twice daily for 7 days. There was no significant difference in the failure rate between patients treated with clindamycin (6.1%) and those treated with metronidazole (4%). Adverse reactions were infrequent and mild in both treatment groups. Three patients who received clindamycin developed non-bloody diarrhea, which was mild and did not necessitate discontinuing therapy. We conclude that clindamycin may be a safe and effective alternative to metronidazole for treating women with bacterial vaginosis. This study was undertaken to evaluate antimicrobial susceptibility of vaginal anaerobic bacteria before and after treatment of bacterial vaginosis.
                A randomized clinical trial of 119 nonpregnant women with bacterial vaginosis receiving either intravaginal metronidazole for 5 days or clindamycin for 3 days was performed. Women had 1 baseline and 3 follow-up visits at which quantitative vaginal cultures were performed. Anaerobic isolates underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
                Complete susceptibility data was available on 95 women (47 metronidazole and 48 clindamycin). Of 1059 anaerobic bacterial isolates, less than 1% demonstrated resistance to metronidazole. In contrast, 17% demonstrated baseline clindamycin resistance, and 53% demonstrated resistance to clindamycin after therapy. Women exposed to clindamycin (but not metronidazole) had high frequencies (80%) of clindamycin-resistant anaerobic bacteria that persisted for 90 days after treatment.
                Treatment of bacterial vaginosis with clindamycin is associated with marked evidence of antimicrobial resistance among vaginal anaerobic bacteria. This may increase the vaginal reservoir of macrolide-resistant bacteria. Trichomonas vaginalis is a common vaginal pathogen. Oral metronidazole is the drug of choice for the treatment of trichomoniasis. Oral metronidazole, however, may cause unpleasant side effects and is contraindicated during the first trimester of pregnancy. In vitro studies and preliminary clinical data have suggested that intravaginal clotrimazole may be effective against this pathogen.
                To compare the efficacy of clotrimazole vaginal tablets, oral metronidazole, and vaginal suppositories containing sulfanilamide, aminacrine, and allantoin (AVC suppositories) in the treatment of women with symptomatic trichomoniasis.
                In a multicenter, open-label trial conducted in 1982 and 1983, 168 symptomatic women with microscopically evident vaginal trichomoniasis were randomized to receive any of 2 g of metronidazole as a single oral dose, two 100-mg clotrimazole vaginal tablets once a day for 7 days, or vaginal suppositories containing 1.05 g of sulfanilamide, 14 mg of aminacrine hydrochloride, and 140 mg of allantoin (AVC suppositories) twice a day for 7 days. Wet mounts and cultures were repated at 1 to 2 and 4 to 6 weeks after completion of treatment.
                The number of patients who had positive cultures after treatment were 40/45 (88.9%) in the clotrimazole group, 35/43 (81.4%) in the AVC suppository group, and 9/45 (20%) in the metronidazole group (P < 0.001). All treatments were associated with a reduction in reported symptoms. Oral metrohidazole was more effective in reducing symptoms than either of the topical preparations. Adverse events, mostly mild or moderate in severity, were reported by 7 (14.6%) of 48 patients who had received oral metronidazole and 4 (7.8%) of 51 women who used AVC suppositories. There were no adverse events reported by the 50 women who used clotrimazole vaginal tablets.
                Oral metronidazole was more effective in eradicating T. vaginalis than clotrimazole vaginal tablets or AVC vaginal suppositories. All three regimens reduced symptoms; oral metronidazole was more effective in reducing symptoms than either topical preparation. To estimate the efficacy of different therapeutic modalities on proven cases of bacterial vaginosis (BV) in patients at high risk of preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes.
                This was a longitudinal prospective comparative study set in the antenatal outpatient clinic of the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt. Four hundred and sixty-eight patients with a clinical picture of threatened preterm labor or at high risk of premature rupture of membranes in the third trimester were screened for BV. Positive BV was diagnosed in 156 patients. They were randomly classified into four equal groups according to the line of medical treatment. The treatments were: (i) oral metronidazole, (ii) clindamycin vaginal cream, (iii) oral clindamycin, or (iv) metronidazole vaginal suppositories. The effects of medical treatment on Amsel's criteria as well as maternal and fetal outcomes were measured.
                Based on Amsel's criteria, 156 patients (33.3%) were diagnosed with BV. There was a significant disappearance of vaginal discharge, with decreased percentages of pH > 4.5, positive amine test, and clue cells after treatment of BV in the four groups without any statistically significant difference between them. There were variable effects of the different treatments on increasing birthweight values, admission to neonatal intensive care units, and prolongation of the gestational age. Some maternal adverse effects have been recorded. There were significant improvements of the outcomes for oral metronidazole and clindamycin compared with outcomes for intravaginal metronidazole and clindamycin.
                Metronidazole and clindamycin achieve nearly equivalent cure rates when administered orally or vaginally in patients at high risk of preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes. Oral metronidazole is considered the drug of choice in treating BV due its high cure rate, better outcomes, and low cost. Trichomonas vaginalis is a common sexually transmitted pathogen. In the United States, oral metronidazole is the only officially sanctioned treatment option.
                This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel with that of oral metronidazole for the treatment of trichomonal vaginitis.
                Women with trichomoniasis were enrolled in this randomized, open-label pilot study of 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel twice daily for 7 days compared with 7 days of generic oral metronidazole, 250 mg, three times daily. Patients were seen for follow-up visits 5 to 7 days and 21 to 28 days after the last dose of medication.
                Using culture for test of cure, trichomonal infection was eliminated in all 15 women treated with oral metronidazole and 7 (44%) of 16 women treated with intravaginal metronidazole. Adverse events were similar, except that there were more taste-related adverse events in the oral metronidazole group. Significant reductions in genitourinary symptoms were seen in both the oral and intravaginal groups.
                This study has shown that 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel is not effective as a single agent for the treatment of trichomoniasis. Future studies may define a role for metronidazole gel for symptomatic relief in patients intolerant of oral medication or as adjunctive treatment with oral metronidazole for the management of patients infected with metronidazole-resistant strains of T. vaginalis. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is particularly common in black women, and in Nigeria it is often caused by Mycoplasma, as well as Atopobium, Prevotella and Gardnerella sp. Antimicrobial metronidazole oral therapy is poorly effective in eradicating the condition and restoring the Lactobacillus microbiota in the vagina. In this study, 40 women diagnosed with BV by discharge, fishy odor, sialidase positive test and Nugent Gram stain scoring, were randomized to receive either two dried capsules containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 each night for 5 days, or 0.75% metronidazole gel, applied vaginally twice a day (in the morning and evening). Follow-up at day 6, 15 and 30 showed cure of BV in significantly more probiotic treated subjects (16, 17 and 18/20, respectively) compared to metronidazole treatment (9, 9 and 11/20: P=0.016 at day 6, P=0.002 at day 15 and P=0.056 at day 30). This is the first report of an effective (90%) cure of BV using probiotic lactobacilli. Given the correlation between BV and HIV, and the high risk of the latter in Nigeria, intravaginal use of lactobacilli could provide women with a self-use therapy, similar to over-the-counter anti-yeast medication, for treatment of urogenital infections. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is associated with preterm delivery, but there is little evidence that treatment improves pregnancy outcomes. We examined whether oral or vaginal metronidazole treatment for BV in early pregnancy was more effective in restoring the normal vaginal environment.
                This was a randomized controlled trial comparing oral and intravaginal metronidazole for treatment of BV in early pregnancy (<20 weeks). Vaginal samples collected at baseline and 4 weeks after treatment were evaluated using gram stain, culture, colorimetric detection of sialidase, and immunoassay for measurement of proinflammatory cytokines interleukins-1beta, -6, -8 (IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8) and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI). We compared the effect of treatment between groups (using chi-square and t test) and within individuals (McNemar's test).
                Of 126 subjects, 108 (86%) completed follow-up (55 oral, 53 intravaginal). Of the study population, 34% achieved therapeutic cure, and this was not different between treatment groups. BV-associated bacteria were significantly reduced in both groups, but few subjects regained colonization with protective lactobacilli. Among women who achieved therapeutic cure, the level of IL-1beta dropped significantly (p < 0.001) and SLPI increased (p = 0.003). More women in the vaginal treatment group had undetectable sialidase after treatment (p = 0.013).
                Treatment with oral or intravaginal metronidazole in early pregnancy reduced colonization with BV-associated bacteria but was not effective in achieving therapeutic cure or in restoring healthy vaginal lactobacilli. Since metronidazole is a mutagen in vitro, there is concern about the widespread systemic use of this drug in women with trichomoniasis, particularly those who are pregnant. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial compared a single 2-g intravaginal dose of metronidazole cream with a single 2-g oral dose of metronidazole in patients with a culture positive for Trichomonas organisms. Of the 302 preenrollment cultures completed, 94 (31%) were positive. Sixty-one patients were enrolled in the study. Each received either oral placebo and intravaginal metronidazole or intravaginal placebo and oral metronidazole. Follow-up cultures were done on posttreatment day 3-5. Of the 53 evaluatable patients, 14 (50%) of 28 in the intravaginal group and 22 (88%) of 25 in the oral group were microbiologically cured (P = .0037). Single-dose intravaginal metronidazole is inferior to single-dose oral metronidazole and cannot be relied on as an alternative therapy. This study enrolled 125 premenopausal women diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis (BV) by presence of vaginal irritation, discharge and 'fishy' odor, and Nugent criteria and detection of sialidase enzyme. The subjects were treated with oral metronidazole (500 mg) twice daily from days 1 to 7, and randomized to receive oral Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 (1 x 10(9)) and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 (1 x 10(9)) or placebo twice daily from days 1 to 30. Primary outcome was cure of BV as determined by normal Nugent score, negative sialidase test and no symptoms or signs of BV at day 30. A total of 106 subjects returned for 30-day follow-up, of which 88% were cured in the antibiotic/probiotic group compared to 40% in the antibiotic/placebo group (p<0.001). Of the remaining subjects, 30% subjects in the placebo group and none in the probiotic group had BV, while 30% in the placebo and 12% in the probiotic group fell into the intermediate category based upon Nugent score, sialidase result and clinical findings. High counts of Lactobacillus sp. (>10(5) CFU/ml) were recovered from the vagina of 96% probiotic-treated subjects compared to 53% controls at day 30. In summary, this study showed efficacious use of lactobacilli and antibiotic in the eradication of BV in black African women. Oral metronidazole is still the drug of choice in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Yet, side effects have been reported, and dosage as well as duration of therapy are still controversial. This study presents a possible alternative treatment using a single dose of metronidazole administered in a vaginal bioadhesive tablet.
                Double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
                The 116 patients were allocated to placebo; metronidazole 100; 250; 500mg in a 1:1:1:1 ratio.
                A cure rate of 64% was obtained with a single 100mg dose of metronidazole formulated in a bioadhesive vaginal tablet compared to a cure rate of 29% in the placebo group. The cure rates with the higher doses were similar 61.5% for 250mg dose and 68% for the 500mg dose. No side effects were reported.
                Treatment of bacterial vaginosis with a single application of 100mg metronidazole in a bioadhesive vaginal tablet was found to be a valid alternative. Further research in relation to tablet shaping and optimal dose finding might increase the cure rate. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common vulvovaginal infection and represents the 35% of all the infections occurring in women in the reproductive age. It is well recognised that serious forms of BV can induce several complications among women undergoing gynaecologic or obstetric surgery, having pelvic inflammatory diseases, temporary or absolute infertility, miscarriage and abortion. At present, the clinical treatment of choice of BV is the use of systemic or local (gel or cream) metronidazole and clindamycin, though systemic use has some limitations due to side-effects and contraindications. Polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) is a new bi-biguanide compound having a broad spectrum activity and low toxicity, that have been successfully utilized in ophthalmology and dentistry. Aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a single-dose vaginal administration of a PHMB vaginal gel in the treatment of BV in comparison to clindamycin vaginal cream.
                One-hundred and ten patients affected by BV were treated with PHMB vaginal gel in single administration or clindamycin vaginal cream 1 daily administration for 7 days.
                We demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of mono-dose administration of a vaginal solution containing PHMB in BV treatment; this efficacy is similar to the one shown in antibiotic therapy. Furthermore, this product was well tolerated by all treated patients.
                Mono-dose PHMB treatment should be regarded as the therapy of choice for BV, using clindamycin and metronidazole only for relapses treatment. To determine the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in women undergoing first trimester suction termination of pregnancy and to evaluate the efficacy of metronidazole in reducing the risk of post abortal pelvic infection in women with bacterial vaginosis.
                Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
                Two teaching hospitals and one district general hospital.
                Two hundred and seventy-three women with bacterial vaginosis undergoing termination of pregnancy.
                Women with bacterial vaginosis, diagnosed using modified Spiegel's criteria, were individually randomised to receive either a 2 g metronidazole suppository or identical placebo per-operatively. Participants, doctors and investigators were blinded to treatment allocation. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire about post-operative symptoms, visits to the general practitioner, antibiotic treatment, readmission to hospital, contraception and emotional response after one month.
                The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis was 29.3% (326/1,111). Intention-to-treat analysis showed that post-operative upper genital tract infection developed in 12/142 (8.5%) women allocated to metronidazole and 21/131 (16.0%) women randomised to placebo, a difference of 7.6% (95% confidence intervals -15.4 to +0.2%; relative risk 0.53. 0.27 to 1.03, P = 0.055). The effect of prophylaxis was similar when the analysis was restricted to women receiving the allocated treatment and with complete follow up. There was no difference in the risk of readmission to hospital and the frequencies of self reported symptoms in the two groups were similar.
                This randomised placebo-controlled trial among women with bacterial vaginosis provides weak evidence that metronidazole decreases the risk of upper genital tract infection after first trimester suction termination of pregnancy but a chance finding could not confidently be excluded. Large well-conducted randomised trials with long term outcome measures are now needed to determine the most effective antibiotic combinations and strategy for prevention of post-abortal pelvic infection. To compare the safety and efficacy of intravaginal clindamycin 2% cream with placebo in nonpregnant women with bacterial vaginosis.
                A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
                Ambulatory patients in the general community.
                Two hundred fifteen nonpregnant outpatients with a diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis were entered into this study. Of the 134 evaluable patients, 65 received clindamycin and 69 placebo. Demographic parameters were comparable between the two treatment groups.
                Study subjects were equally randomized to receive either 5 g of clindamycin 2% vaginal cream or placebo cream for seven nights.
                Clinical and microbiologic follow-up evaluations were scheduled for 5-10 days and 25-39 days posttreatment. Patients were interviewed about signs and symptoms, adverse events, and compliance. Diagnostic examinations were performed.
                Clinical success rates (cure and improvement) occurred in 50 of 65 patients who received clindamycin (77 percent) and 17 of 69 patients who received placebo (25 percent) by the first posttreatment visit (p < 0.001). Microbiologic cures or improvement were observed in 59 of the 65 patients treated with clindamycin (91 percent) compared with 20 of 69 placebo-treated patients (29 percent) (p < 0.001). At the end of the study, clinical and microbiologic cures or improvement were evident in 45 of 57 (79 percent) and 37 of 57 clindamycin-treated patients (65 percent), respectively, and 18 of 51 (35 percent) and 14 of 51 (28 percent) of the placebo-treated patients, respectively. The success rates with clindamycin 2% cream were statistically higher than those with placebo. The adverse-effect profiles in the two groups were similar and no serious adverse effects were reported. Patients who received clindamycin had a statistically higher incidence of nonbacterial vaginitis/cervicitis (18.5 vs. 7.5 percent, p = 0.003).
                Intravaginal clindamycin 2% cream appears to be an effective and safe treatment of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis in nonpregnant women. The expected 4-week cure rate after conventional treatment of bacterial vaginosis are only 65-70%. In an attempt to improve the cure rate by adding probiotic lactobacilli we performed a double-blind placebo-controlled study of adjuvant lactobacilli treatment after an open treatment with vaginal clindamycin ovules. Women with bacterial vaginosis as defined by Amsel's criteria were treated with clindamycin ovules. Vaginal smears were collected and analysed according to Nugent's criteria. During the following menstruation period the women used, as an adjuvant treatment, either lactobacilli-prepared tampons or placebo tampons. The lactobacilli tampons were loaded with a mixture of freeze-dried L. fermentum, L. casei var. rhamnosus and L. gasseri. The cure rate was recorded after the second menstruation period. There was no improvement in the cure rate after treatment with lactobacilli-containing tampons compared to placebo tampons; the cure rates as defined by Amsel's criteria were 56% and 62%, respectively, and 55% and 63%, as defined by Nugent's criteria. This is the first study to report cure rates for women with 'intermediate' wet smear ratings according to Nugent's classification and this group had an overall cure rate of 44%. The cure rate of treatment of bacterial vaginosis was not improved by using lactobacilli-prepared tampons for one menstruation. 101 patients with Clostridium-difficile-associated diarrhoea or colitis were prospectively randomised to 10-day oral courses of metronidazole, 250 mg four times a day, or vancomycin, 500 mg four times a day. 7 did not complete the protocol and were dropped from analysis. Pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) was diagnosed after endoscopy in 33 patients. Of the remaining patients without PMC, 38 had both C difficile culture and cytotoxin and 23 had only culture evidence of C difficile. 52 evaluable patients received vancomycin and 42 received metronidazole. There were two treatment failures with metronidazole and none with vancomycin (p = 0.20); and two relapses with metronidazole versus six with vancomycin (p = 0.17). Treatment in 1 patient in each group was discontinued because of drug intolerance. Response and relapse rates of the 33 patients with PMC were no different from those of the remaining patients. Pharmacy cost for the dosage used was $387.48 to $520.00 for vancomycin and $11.84 for metronidazole. Metronidazole and vancomycin have equivalent efficacy and relapse rates and are tolerated to a similar extent by patients with C-difficile-related diarrhoea and colitis, but metronidazole is considerably more economical. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the safety and efficacy of a new cephamycin, cefminox 2 g/12 h, to those of the usual regimen combining metronidazole 500 mg/8 h and gentamicin 80 mg/8 h (M+G).
                160 patients with clinically proven intra-abdominal infection were prospectively included in an open parallel randomized comparative multicenter trial. Antibiotics were started preoperatively and discontinued after clinical and laboratory evidence of resolution of the infection. Serum and peritoneal fluid levels and serum bactericidal activities were also studied.
                150 patients were clinically evaluable. There was one failure in the cefminox group and three in the M+G group (not significant, RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1-1.15). No differences were found in the number of wound infections, length of stay or duration of antibiotic therapy. Adverse effects were reported in 11 cases, all of them mild to moderate. Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis were the most frequently found microorganisms.
                Cefminox is as effective and as safe as M+G in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Clindamycin preparations, oral metronidazole, and oral and intravaginal tablets of lactobacillus were effective for bacterial vaginosis. Hydrogen peroxide douche and triple sulphonamide cream were ineffective. Metronidazole caused metallic taste, nausea and vomiting. We need better-designed trials with larger sample sizes to test the effectiveness of promising drugs.