Nitinol stent implantation versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in superficial femoral artery lesions up to 10 cm in length: the femoral artery stenting trial (FAST). Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery. Angioplasty or bypass for superficial femoral artery disease? A randomised controlled trial. Systematic versus selective stent placement after superficial femoral artery balloon angioplasty: a multicenter prospective randomized study. Functional and clinical outcomes of nitinol stenting with and without abciximab for complex superficial femoral artery disease: a randomized trial. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting for femoropopliteal occlusions? A randomized controlled study. Randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of the polymer-based 17-beta estradiol-eluting stent for treatment of native coronary artery lesions: six-month results of the ETHOS I trial. Coronary stenting after rotational atherectomy in diffuse lesions of the small coronary artery: comparison with balloon angioplasty before stenting.
Endoluminal treatment of superficial femoral artery lesions is a matter of controversy. The present study was designed to investigate the impact of nitinol stenting of superficial femoral artery lesions with a maximum length of 10 cm on restenosis and clinical outcomes at 1 year.
                Two hundred forty-four patients (168 men; 66+/-9 years) with a single superficial femoral artery lesion and chronic limb ischemia were randomized to implantation of a single Bard Luminexx 3 stent (123 patients) or stand-alone percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) (121 patients). Mean lesion length was 45 mm. Technical success (residual stenosis <50% for PTA, <30% for stenting) was achieved in 96 patients assigned to PTA (79%) and 117 patients assigned to stenting (95%); 13 PTA group patients (11%) "crossed over" to stenting. At 1 year, the primary end point of ultrasound-assessed binary restenosis was reached in 39 of 101 PTA group patients (38.6%) and 32 of 101 stent group patients (31.7%; absolute treatment difference, -6.9%; 95% CI, -19.7% to 6.2%; P=0.377). Target lesion revascularization rates at 1 year were 18.3% and 14.9%, respectively (absolute treatment difference, -3.3%; 95% CI, -13.0% to 6.4%; P=0.595). No statistically significant difference between treatment groups was observed at 12 months in the improvement by at least 1 Rutherford category of peripheral arterial disease.
                In the present study of patients with short superficial femoral artery lesions, the hypothesized absolute difference of 20% in binary restenosis at 1 year between the implantation of a single Luminexx nitinol stent and stand-alone PTA could not be demonstrated. A smaller difference requiring a larger trial might have been missed. Because stent implantation for disease of the superficial femoral artery has been associated with high rates of late clinical failure, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is preferred for endovascular treatment, and stenting is recommended only in the event of suboptimal technical results. We evaluated whether primary implantation of a self-expanding nitinol (nickel-titanium) stent yielded anatomical and clinical benefits superior to those afforded by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with optional secondary stenting.
                We randomly assigned 104 patients who had severe claudication or chronic limb ischemia due to stenosis or occlusion of the superficial femoral artery to undergo primary stent implantation (51 patients) or angioplasty (53 patients). Restenosis and clinical outcomes were assessed at 6 and 12 months.
                The mean (+/-SD) length of the treated segment was 132+/-71 mm in the stent group and 127+/-55 mm in the angioplasty group. Secondary stenting was performed in 17 of 53 patients (32 percent) in the angioplasty group, in most cases because of a suboptimal result after angioplasty. At 6 months, the rate of restenosis on angiography was 24 percent in the stent group and 43 percent in the angioplasty group (P=0.05); at 12 months the rates on duplex ultrasonography were 37 percent and 63 percent, respectively (P=0.01). Patients in the stent group were able to walk significantly farther on a treadmill at 6 and 12 months than those in the angioplasty group.
                In the intermediate term, treatment of superficial-femoral-artery disease by primary implantation of a self-expanding nitinol stent yielded results that were superior to those with the currently recommended approach of balloon angioplasty with optional secondary stenting. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00281060.).
                Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. To evaluate whether angioplasty or above-knee bypass is the best treatment for symptomatic superficial femoral artery occlusive lesions, we performed a multicentre randomised trial.
                Between October 1995 and August 1998, 56 patients were enrolled, all with symptoms related to a 5-15 cm long occlusive lesion of the superficial femoral artery. Thirty-one patients were randomly assigned to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA); 25 patients to bypass surgery. All patients were followed at 1, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. The primary outcome of our study was re-occlusion of the femoral artery.
                Thirty patients underwent the allocated PTA and 24 patients underwent bypass surgery. Cumulative 1-year primary patency after PTA was 43 and 82% after bypass surgery. After PTA more than half of the patients had a re-occlusion with an absolute risk reduction of 31% (CI: 6-56%) in favour of bypass surgery. The hazard ratio for occlusion comparing PTA with bypass surgery is 2.24 (95% CI: 0.9-5.58).
                Despite 18 participating centres only 56 patients were randomised to PTA our bypass surgery. Based on our results, for every three patients treated with bypass surgery instead of PTA, one additional re-occlusion is prevented. Therefore, we conclude that with respect to patency, for long superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenoses or occlusions, surgery is better than PTA. Outcome with selective or systematic stenting with the Palmaz vascular stent was compared in patients with limb-threatening ischemia or persistent disabling claudication despite medical therapy, with less than 7 cm stenosis or occlusion of the superficial femoral artery.
                This was a multicenter prospective randomized trial with centralized allocation of treatment and independent review of vascular events. The primary end point was presence of more than 50% stenosis at 1-year angiographic follow-up. Secondary end points were survival; occurrence of vascular events in the treated leg; and number of failed procedures, defined as more than 50% stenosis or death at 1 year.
                Two hundred twenty-seven patients were enrolled in the study, 112 in the selective stent group, and 115 in the systematic stent group. Seventeen patients (15%) in the selective stent group received a stent after suboptimal results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Angiograms for 140 patients were available at 1-year follow-up and demonstrated no statistical difference between the two groups; more than 50% stenosis of the dilated site was noted in 21 of 65 patients (32,3%) in the selective stent group and 26 of 75 patients (34.7%) in the systematic stent group (P =.85, Fisher exact test). Survival in the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent groups was, respectively, 92% and 96% at 1 year, 89% and 93% at 2 years, and 82% and 80% at 4 years (P =.40, log-rank test). Survival free of new vascular events in the treated limb was 77% and 65% at 1 year, 70% and 53% at 2 years, and 57% and 44% at 4 years (P =.017, log-rank test). Number of failed procedures at 1 year was 29 of 86 (33%) and 30 of 89 (34%) (P = 0.9).
                Systematic stenting of short stenosis or occlusion of the superficial femoral artery is not justified. Palmaz vascular stent placement should be reserved for use in patients with suboptimal results of balloon angioplasty. To evaluate the effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition during nitinol stenting, of superficial femoral occlusive disease.
                Stent implantation in the superficial femoral artery has been associated with suboptimal results while Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have shown improved procedural results during coronary intervention. We evaluated abciximab infusion during (Smart Stent) implantation in superficial femoral obstructions.
                We conducted a randomized placebo controlled trial. The two primary end points include: (1) 9-month restenosis defined as a decrease in ankle brachial index and in-stent duplex ultrasound restenosis: (2) adverse events defined as death (30 days) or repeat revascularization within 9 months.
                Twenty-seven patients were randomized to abciximab and 24 patients to control (placebo). The primary end point of cumulative restenosis occurred in 15.4% of patients administered abciximab and in 12% administered placebo (P = 0.873). The primary restenosis endpoint in diabetics and total occlusions were similar at 14.3% and 15.4% respectively. The composite end point of 30-day mortality and 9-month revascularization occurred in 5.8% abciximab and 0% (P = 0.274) placebo with no 30-day deaths. Graded treadmill time and Rutherford class were all significantly improved in both groups, but the abciximab group did not appear to demonstrate any identifiable effect.
                (Smart Stent) nitinol stenting of the superficial femoral artery was associated with favorable functional outcomes at 9 months. Adjunctive abciximab did not appear to demonstrate any identifiable effect.
                2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. To investigate the-one year outcome of PTA and stenting and PTA alone for femoropopliteal occlusions.
                Randomized prospective study
                32 patients with femoropopliteal occlusions were randomized into two treatment groups: PTA and Strecker-stent (n=15) and PTA alone (n=17). The median age of the patients was 71 years. All patients had chronic limb ischaemia, 66% had tissue loss, 19% had rest pain and 15% had disabling claudication. The median ABPI was 0.45. The occlusion was confined to the superficial femoral artery in 30 cases and to the popliteal artery in 2 cases. The median length of the occlusions was 7.3 cm. Aspirin (ASA), 160 mg daily, was administrated postoperatively but no anticoagulation was used. The follow-up included: clinical examination, measurement of ABPI and control angiography at 12 months or earlier when necessary (20 patients).
                There was no mortality or limb loss as a consequence of the treatment. There were six (16%) immediate major complications in five patients. In the PTA group, one patient had a myocardial infarction and three patients needed arteriography due to bleeding. In the stent group, one patient required arteriography and embolectomy. The one-year mortality was 6% and there were no amputations. Four patients (two in each group) were operated on with a femorodistal bypass. The rate of clinical improvement was 71% after PTA and stent and 60% after PTA alone (p=0.17). An increased ABPI (>0.10) was shown in 50% of the stent group and 61% in the PTA group (p=0.17). Angiographic re-occlusions were seen in 33% and 75% in the stent and PTA groups respectively (p=0.17), while the rate of restenosis was significantly higher in the stent group (50% vs 25%) (p=0.033).
                Stenting following PTA for femoropopliteal occlusions does not significantly improve neither the clinical state nor the clinical/angiographic patency. The results do not justify any routine placement of stent following PTA in the successfully recanalized femoropopliteal arteries. The low rate of acceptance of a follow-up angiography indicates that this kind of study should preferably use duplex scanning instead of angiography for follow-up. The ETHOS I trial was the first in-human experience evaluating the safety and efficacy of two different release formulations of the 17-beta estradiol-eluting R-Stent versus uncoated control stents for the treatment of patients with single de novo native coronary lesions.
                Estrogens were reported to inhibit neointimal proliferation and to accelerate endothelial regeneration after coronary angioplasty and thus could be an ideal compound to deliver on a stent for the purpose of reducing in-stent restenosis.
                Ninety-five patients were randomized to receive a slow-release (n = 32) or the moderate release (n = 31) formulations or the bare metal stent (n = 32). The primary end point was the 6-month percent in-stent volume obstruction by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
                Diabetes was present in 29.5% of patients; the mean reference vessel diameter was 2.90 mm; and the mean lesion length was 13.5 mm. Primary endpoint, 6-month percent in-stent volume obstruction by IVUS, did not differ significantly between the 3 groups (31% +/- 14%, 33% +/- 11%, and 31% +/- 14%, P = 0.83). Secondary endpoints also did not differ significantly between the groups including 6-month rates of in-lesion binary angiographic restenosis (13.3%, 14.3%, and 12.5%, P = 0.98), in-stent late loss (0.82 +/- 0.49 mm, 0.86 +/- 0.53 mm, and 0.84 +/- 0.46 mm, P = 0.97), target lesion revascularization (12.5%, 6.9%, and 6.5%, P = 0.64), and major adverse cardiac events (18.8%, 10.3%, and 6.5%, P = 0.31).
                In this first-in-man randomized trial, the 17-beta estradiol-eluting R-Stent, in either slow- or moderate-release formulations, was well-tolerated, but showed no benefit for treatment of coronary lesions when compared to controls.
                (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. The purpose of this randomized trial was to evaluate the role of debulking and balloon predilation on acute and long-term results of stent implantation in diffuse stenosis of small vessels. Patients with symptomatic diffuse stenosis of the native left anterior descending coronary artery between 2 and 2.9 mm in size were randomly assigned to rotational atherectomy (group I, n = 21) or balloon dilation (group II, n = 20) before stenting. The primary end point of the study was the incidence of angiographic restenosis at follow-up; adverse clinical events, such as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or target vessel revascularization, were assessed as secondary end points. Acute gain was significantly greater in group I than in group II (p = 0.038), but net gain at follow-up was similar in both groups (p = 0.24). There was no significant difference in angiographic restenosis rate (33.3% vs 31.3%, p = 0.80), target vessel revascularization (23.8% vs 15%, p = 0.21) or 1-year event-free survival rate (72.8% vs 84.6%, p = 0.28). In conclusion, rotational atherectomy before stenting showed no additional benefit over balloon dilation with stenting in the management of diffuse lesions in small coronary vessels.
There is limited benefit to stenting lesions of the superficial femoral artery in addition to angioplasty, however this cannot be recommended routinely based on the results of this analysis.