Cryosurgery as a treatment for prostate carcinoma: results and complications. Preliminary outcomes following cryosurgical ablation of the prostate in patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Prospective trial of cryosurgical ablation of the prostate: five-year results. Targeted cryoablation of the prostate: 7-year outcomes in the primary treatment of prostate cancer. Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate: high risk patient outcomes. Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate: two-year prostate-specific antigen and biopsy results. Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate: 5-year follow-up of a prospective study. A randomized trial of choice of treatment in prostate cancer: the effect of intervention on the treatment chosen. Randomized, multicenter, phase II trial of two multicomponent regimens in androgen-independent prostate cancer.
There has been a resurgence of interest in cryosurgical ablation of the prostate for the treatment of carcinoma. This is due to recent advances in cryosurgical technology, which have resulted in relatively lower morbidity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided cryosurgical ablation of prostate carcinoma.
                Eighty-three patients who had biopsy-proven prostate carcinoma underwent cryosurgical ablation of their entire prostate gland. The initial group of 12 patients had their procedures performed under ultrasound guidance only. The other 71 patients had cryosurgery performed with temperature monitoring in combination with ultrasound guidance. Twelve patients who had positive biopsies underwent a second cryosurgical procedure. All patients had prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels measured at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months after cryosurgery. Ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies were performed at 3-6, 12-18, and 24 months.
                The median PSA dropped by 95%, from a preoperative value of 4.3 ng/mL to 0.2 ng/mL 30 months after cryosurgery. The authors experienced a high failure rate (positive biopsies) of 83% for the initial group of 12 patients who did not have temperature monitoring during the cryosurgical procedure. This was in contrast to a success rate of 90% (negative biopsies) for the next 71 patients, who did have temperature monitoring (P < 0.05, chi-square test). Twelve patients underwent a second cryosurgery, and the success rate for this group was 91% (11 of 12 patients). The combined success rate for both the first cryosurgery and the second was 94% (62 of 77 patients). Complications included urethral sloughing, urinary incontinence, impotence, bladder neck contracture, and bladder contracture. The majority of patients recovered rapidly from their cryosurgical procedures and were able to resume normal activities 3-4 weeks afterward.
                These preliminary results demonstrate that cryosurgical ablation of the prostate is a viable treatment option for prostate carcinoma. In the authors' experience, ultrasound alone may not be adequate for monitoring the entire cryosurgical procedure. The authors found that temperature monitoring shortened their learning curve, enabled them to freeze prostate tissue more aggressively, and may have contributed to their overall success. Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate is a novel therapeutic modality that induces cell lysis in the prostate by direct application of low temperatures. We have been conducting an ongoing prospective pilot study of the use of cryosurgical prostate ablation in treating patients with nonmetastatic prostate adenocarcinoma since January 1993. Results in 145 consecutive patients with mean 36 months and minimum 12 months of followup are presented.
                Accrual was open to patients with clinical stages T1a to T3c prostate adenocarcinoma. Pelvic lymph node dissections were recommended but not required for patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 15 ng./ml. before study entry. PSA changes, random prostate biopsy findings and morbidities after cryosurgical prostate ablation were recorded for each patient.
                Overall actuarial rates at 42 months for maintaining PSA less than 0.3 and less than 1.0 were 59% and 66%, respectively. The overall actuarial progression-free rate at 60 months was 56%. Among 160 biopsies performed 16% showed some evidence of residual carcinoma. Overall crude rates of maintaining either a negative biopsy or PSA less than 0.3 at 6 and 24 months after cryosurgical prostate ablation were 87% and 73%, respectively. Significantly higher morbidities were seen in previously radiated patients undergoing cryosurgical prostate ablation compared to those with no prior radiation. Among nonradiated patients 85% experienced no significant morbidity after cryosurgical prostate ablation.
                Although preliminary, short-term outcomes after cryosurgical prostate ablation appear to be comparable to identical outcomes reported for external beam radiotherapy. Based on these results cryosurgical prostate ablation appears to be an effective therapeutic alternative for treating patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma. To determine in a prospective pilot study the safety and efficacy of cryosurgical ablation for localized prostate carcinoma.
                A total of 87 cryosurgical procedures were performed on 76 consecutive patients between December 1994 and February 1998. All patients had histologically proved adenocarcinoma of the prostate, with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) readings of less than 30 ng/mL. Clinical evaluations, PSA determinations, and patient self-reported quality-of-life questionnaires (functional assessment of cancer treatment-prostate; FACT-P) were used to determine biochemical and clinical disease-free status and complications. Patients had a mean follow-up of 50 months (minimum 36).
                Follow-up biopsies were performed in 73 patients, and 72 were negative for malignancy after one or more treatments. Ten patients required two treatments and 1 patient required three treatments. The 5-year overall and cancer-specific survival rate was 89% (95% confidence interval, 83% to 97%) and 98.6% (95% confidence interval, 96% to 100%), respectively. The undetectable PSA rate (less than 0.3 ng/mL) for low-risk patients (n = 13) was 60% at 5 years; for moderate-risk patients (n = 23), it was 77%, and for high-risk patients (n = 40), 48%. The corresponding percentage of patients with a PSA level less than 1.0 ng/mL at 5 years was 75%, 89%, and 76%. Sloughing occurred in 3 patients (3.9%), incontinence in 1 (1.3%), and testicular abscess in 1 (1.3%). At 3 years, 18 (47%) of 38 patients capable of unassisted intercourse at the time of cryosurgery had resumed sexual intercourse, 5 spontaneously and 13 with sildenafil or prostaglandin.
                The results of this prospective evaluation show cryosurgery to be both a safe and an effective option in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The efficacy and safety of the long-term experience with targeted cryoablation of prostate cancer (TCAP) at a community hospital is retrospectively reviewed. A series of 590 consecutive patients who underwent TCAP as primary therapy with curative intent for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer from March 1993 to September 2001 were identified. Patients were stratified into 3 risk groups according to clinical characteristics. Biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS), post-TCAP biopsy results, and post-TCAP morbidity were calculated and presented. The mean follow-up time for all patients was 5.43 years. The percentages of patients in the low-, medium-, and high-risk groups were 15.9%, 30.3%, and 53.7%, respectively. Using a prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based definition of biochemical failure of 0.5 ng/mL, results were as follows: (1) the 7-year actuarial bDFS for low-, medium-, and high-risk patients were 61%, 68%, and 61%, respectively; (2) the bDFS probabilities for a PSA cutoff of 1.0 ng/mL for low-, medium-, and high-risk patients were 87%, 79%, and 71%, respectively; and (3) the bDFS probabilities for low-, medium-, and high-risk patients using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition of biochemical failure (3 successive increases of PSA level) were 92%, 89%, and 89%, respectively. The rate of positive biopsy was 13%. After a positive biopsy, 32 patients underwent repeat cryoablation. For those patients who underwent repeat cryoablation, 68%, 72%, and 91% remain bDFS using definitions of 0.5 ng/mL, 1.0 ng/mL, and the ASTRO criteria, respectively, after a mean follow-up time since repeat cryoablation of 63 months. The rates of morbidity were modest, and no serious complications were observed. TCAP was shown to equal or surpass the outcome data of external-beam radiation, 3-dimensional conformal radiation, and brachytherapy. These 7-year outcome data provide compelling validation of TCAP as an efficacious treatment modality for locally confined and locally advanced prostatic carcinoma. The authors report their experience with cryosurgical ablation of the prostate in men with high-risk features for prostate carcinoma who were unwilling to undergo radical surgery or radiation therapy.
                Between January 1998 and April 2002, 65 men underwent primary cryosurgery for prostate carcinoma with high-risk features. All patients had biopsy-proven prostate carcinoma without evidence for metastatic disease on magnetic resonance images, computed tomography scans, or radionuclide images of bones. High-risk parameters were defined as either a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >/= 10 ng/mL, or a Gleason sum score >/= 8, or both. Patients who had undergone prior surgery, radiation therapy, or cryoablation for prostate carcinoma were excluded from the study. Patients were monitored with physical examination and PSA screening every 3 months and with radiologic imaging when indicated.
                The median patient age was 72 years (range, 41-86 years), and t he median follow-up was 35 months (range, 4-77 months). There were 2 patients (3.1%) with rectal pain and incontinence. Durable PSA biochemical disease-free survival was noted in 83.3% of patients according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) criteria. A 6-year Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed an 81.7% ASTRO survival probability as well as PSA nadir < 4.0 ng/mL and PSA nadir < 1.0 ng/mL projections of 50% and 35%, respectively. One of 8 postcryosurgery biopsies (12.5%) were positive. No patient had progressed at last follow-up, and the overall survival rate was 100%.
                Cryoablation was a feasible treatment option in patients with organ-confined prostate carcinoma who had high-risk features. Longer follow-up will be necessary to determine the effectiveness of this approach.
                (c) 2005 American Cancer Society. Percutaneous cryosurgical ablation of the prostate (CSAP) was performed on patients with localized or locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate. To assess local disease control, post-treatment biopsy and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were obtained at 3 and 24 months post-treatment.
                From June 1990 through May 1994, CSAP was performed 448 times on 383 patients under Institutional Review Board protocols. A urethral warming catheter was used for all procedures. A total of 239 patients were followed for a minimum of 21 months after treatment. None of this group had received prior local treatment. The group consisted of patients who were newly diagnosed and treated solely with cryotherapy (virgin); the remainder had been on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) prior to CSAP.
                Biopsies were obtained from 114 patients at 21 months or more after treatment. In the virgin group, 79% had a negative biopsy after one or more treatments, and 88% of the ADT group are negative after one or more treatments. Overall, 69% had a negative biopsy after one treatment and 82% had a negative biopsy following one or more CSAP treatments. Of a group of 163 patients, PSA data were evaluable at 21 months or more after treatment. In the virgin group, 60% had a PSA 0.4 ng/mL or less, and 77% had a PSA 1.0 ng/mL or less. In the ADT group, 40% had a PSA 0.4 ng/mL or less, and 69% had a PSA value of 1.0 ng/m Lor less. Complications were minimal, the most common one being urethral tissue sloughing, which occurred in 10% of patients.
                CSAP appears to be effective in obtaining local control as measured by biopsy and PSA 21 months or more post-treatment. When retrospectively comparing our results with recently published radiotherapy series, CSAP was more effective in obtaining nadir PSA values 1.0 ng/mL or less and negative biopsies at 21 months or more after treatment. To study the complications and oncological outcome after cryosurgical ablation of the prostate (CSAP).
                Fifty-four patients with prostate cancer were entered into this prospective phase II trial of CSAP. Patients were followed with serum PSA determinations, follow-up biopsies at 3-6 months postoperatively and a questionnaire to assess complications. A PSA of >1 ng/ml or a positive biopsy was interpreted as progression.
                Mean follow-up was 58.5 months. Patients needed a suprapubic catheter postoperatively for in mean 18 days. Transient penile numbness occurred in 15%. Bothersome sloughing of dead tissue was noticed by 15% of patients and 15% needed a transurethral resection. Nine patients (17%) developed strictures and five patients stone formation in the prostatic urethra. One patient developed a perennial fistula. Thirty-nine out of 43 patients reporting on potency become impotent, nine patients developed a slight stress incontinence and one severe incontinence.At median follow-up, the actuarial progression-free survival was 38.9%. Fourteen out of 50 patients biopsied (28%) had remaining cancer in their prostates.
                High complication rates in combination with poor oncological outcome has made us stop using this treatment modality. To determine whether different approaches in the choice of treatment affect the treatment chosen by the patient for prostate cancer.
                We conducted a randomized trial with 210 men who had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1993-94 at four major hospitals in Finland. After obtaining informed consent the men were randomized either to an intervention arm, in which there was greater patient participation in the choice of treatment following a structured procedure, or a control arm in which the standard approach, i.e. a standardized treatment protocol, was used. The main outcome measure of the analysis was the primary treatment chosen for prostate cancer.
                In the enhanced participation arm patients not eligible for radical prostatectomy chose orchidectomy less frequently and favoured nonsurgical endocrine treatment than in the treatment protocol arm. Radical prostatectomy was the most commonly chosen treatment option in both arms among men with operable cancer. The way treatment options were presented affected the treatment chosen for prostate cancer.
                Patients with prostate cancer are willing and able to take an active role in making decisions. The preferences of patients with prostate cancer in the choice of treatment may differ from the priorities of the physicians. Several multicomponent regimens have been reported to be useful in advanced androgen-independent prostate cancer. We used a randomized phase II design to evaluate and compare two such regimens. Patients were accrued primarily in the community setting.
                Patients with progressive, androgen-independent prostate cancer were randomly assigned to one of two treatments: either ketoconazole/doxorubicin alternating with vinblastine/estramustine (KA/VE) or paclitaxel, estramustine, and oral etoposide (TEE). Patients were prospectively stratified on the basis of disease volume. The primary end points were response and overall survival time.
                A total of 75 patients were registered; 71 are included in the analysis. By the criterion of an 80% prostate-specific antigen reduction maintained for at least 8 weeks, 11 (30%) of 37 patients in the TEE arm responded, whereas 11 (32%) of 34 assigned to KA/VE responded. Median survival was 16.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.5 to 21.2 months) in the TEE arm and 23.4 months (95% CI, 12.9 to 30.6 months) for patients treated with KA/VE. Many patients (24%) failed to complete at least 6 weeks of therapy, including five (8%) treatment-related early deaths.
                Each of these regimens produced clinically significant responses, and the observed median survival (18.9 months for all 71 patients) compares favorably with previously published results, especially in the community setting. Nonetheless, it is apparent that these first-generation regimens must be applied judiciously, and thus we view efforts at better patient selection and the development of more tolerable therapies as higher priorities than carrying either of these regimens to phase III evaluation in the cooperative group setting.
Cryotherapy offers a potential alternative to standard therapies for the primary treatment of localised prostate cancer. However, the poor quality of the available studies makes it difficult to determine the relative benefits of this modality. Randomised trials are needed to fully evaluate the full potential of cryotherapy in men with this disease. Patients selecting cryotherapy as their therapeutic option should be made fully aware of the reported efficacy, complications and the low-grade evidence from which these data are derived.