Steroid avoidance in renal transplantation using basiliximab induction, cyclosporine-based immunosuppression and protocol biopsies. Steroid-withdrawal at 3 days after renal transplantation with anti-IL-2 receptor alpha therapy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Multicenter randomized prospective trial of steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients receiving basiliximab, cyclosporine microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil. Withdrawal of steroids from triple-drug therapy in kidney transplant patients. Early steroid withdrawal in renal transplantation with tacrolimus dual therapy: a pilot study. Early steroid withdrawal after liver transplantation: the Canadian tacrolimus versus microemulsion cyclosporin A trial: 1-year follow-up. Prospective, randomized trial of steroid withdrawal in kidney recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine. Renal allograft immunosuppression. II. A randomized trial of withdrawal of one drug in triple drug immunosuppression. Randomized prospective trial of early steroid withdrawal compared with low-dose steroids in renal transplant recipients using serial protocol biopsies to assess efficacy and safety. Double-blind comparison of two corticosteroid regimens plus mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine for prevention of acute renal allograft rejection. Randomised controlled trial of steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients receiving triple immunosuppression. Prednisone withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients on cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil--a prospective randomized study. Steroid Withdrawal Study Group. High rejection rate during calcineurin inhibitor-free and early steroid withdrawal immunosuppression in renal transplantation. Clinical rejection and persistent immune regulation in kidney transplant patients. A randomized trial of three renal transplant induction antibodies: early comparison of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid dosing, and newer immune-monitoring. Basiliximab reduces the incidence of acute cellular rejection in live-related-donor kidney transplantation: a three-year prospective randomized trial. Limited dose monoclonal IL-2R antibody induction protocol after primary kidney transplantation. A randomized prospective study comparing low-dose OKT3 to low-dose ATG for the treatment of acute steroid-resistant rejection episodes in kidney transplant recipients. Withdrawal of cyclosporine or prednisone six months after kidney transplantation in patients on triple drug therapy: a randomized, prospective, multicenter study. A randomized trial of steroid avoidance in renal transplant patients treated with everolimus and cyclosporine. A randomized prospective trial comparing cyclosporine monotherapy with triple-drug therapy in renal transplantation. Basiliximab (Simulect) reduces acute rejection among sensitized kidney allograft recipients. Randomised trial of basiliximab versus placebo for control of acute cellular rejection in renal allograft recipients. CHIB 201 International Study Group. A randomized clinical trial of OKT3 monoclonal antibody for acute rejection of cadaveric renal transplants. Ortho Multicenter Transplant Study Group.
Reducing chronic steroid exposure is important to minimize steroid-related morbidity, particularly for susceptible renal transplant recipients. Steroid-free and steroid-sparing protocols have shown benefits, but safety has not been established for all populations. We investigated the safety of steroid avoidance (SA) in a population including African-Americans, using modern immunosuppression with protocol biopsy monitoring.
                A randomized-controlled SA trial (early discontinuation, days 2-7) was conducted in a population (n = 77) including African-Americans and cadaveric kidney recipients. Patients received basiliximab, cyclosporine (CsA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). In controls, steroids were tapered to 5 mg prednisone/d by day 30. Protocol biopsies were performed (1, 6, 12 and 24 months) to evaluate subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN).
                The SA did not result in significantly higher incidences of graft loss, AR, SCAR, CAN, or renal fibrosis. SA patients experienced similar renal function, comparable serum lipid levels, and a trend toward fewer cases of new-onset diabetes. Clinical outcomes of African-American and non-African-American patients did not significantly differ.
                The SA is safe in the context of basiliximab induction and CsA-based immunosuppression. This protocol could minimize steroid-related side effects in susceptible groups, including African-Americans, without increasing the risk of AR or graft failure. Steroids have been included in most immunosuppressive regimens after renal transplantation, but are feared for their side-effects. We conducted a prospective multicenter study to investigate whether it is feasible to withdraw steroids early after transplantation with the use of anti-IL-2Ralpha induction, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). A total of 364 patients were randomized to receive either two doses of daclizumab (1 mg/kg) and, for the first 3 days, 100 mg of prednisolone (daclizumab group n = 186), or steroids (tapered to 0 mg at week 16; controls n = 178). All patients received tacrolimus and MMF. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months was not different between the daclizumab group (15%) and the controls (14%) (95% confidence interval of difference: -6 to + 8%, NS). Graft survival at 12 months was comparable in the two groups (daclizumab group: 91%; controls: 90%). Mean arterial blood pressure, serum lipids, and incidence of patients with hyperglycemia were temporary lower in the daclizumab group compared with controls. The immunosuppressive regimen of the daclizumab group was associated with increased costs. In conclusion, with the use of anti-IL-2Ra induction and daily therapy with tacrolimus and MMF it is feasible to withdraw steroids at 3 days after renal transplantation. Corticosteroids withdrawal from immunosuppressive regimens has thus far been associated with increased risk of acute rejection episodes. In this study, basiliximab, a chimeric monoclonal interleukin-2 receptor antagonist, added to a maintenance regimen consisting of cyclosporine microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil was studied for its effectiveness in allowing early corticosteroid withdrawal in de novo renal allograft recipients. Primary renal transplant recipients receiving basiliximab, cyclosporine-microemulsion, and mycophenolate mofetil, were randomized to either corticosteroid withdrawal at day four post-transplantation (n = 40) or standard steroid therapy (n = 43). The primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes. Randomized subjects who underwent transplantation and received at least one dose of basiliximab were analyzed in an intent-to-treat fashion. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months was not significantly different between the steroid withdrawal group (20%) and the standard treatment group (16%). Patient and graft survival was 100% in the steroid withdrawal group while one death in a patient with a functioning graft occurred in the standard steroid group. Seventy-two percent of the steroid withdrawal group remained off steroids at 6 months post-transplant. Allograft function and incidence of adverse events and infections were similar between the two groups. Rapid and early corticosteroid withdrawal among renal transplant recipients receiving basiliximab induction and daily therapy with cyclosporine-microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil was not associated with an increased risk of acute rejection. In renal transplant patients with stable graft function, triple-drug immunosuppression may not be necessary, while withdrawal of steroids may eliminate side effects. The primary aim of this study was to assess the risk of rejection after steroid withdrawal.
                A total of 88 patients with stable graft function and serum creatinine <160 micromol/l, treated with cyclosporin A, azathioprine and prednisone were randomized into group A (n=46) with a gradual prednisone reduction to zero in the course of 6 months, and group B (n=42) on triple-drug therapy without change. At the time of randomization, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was carried out in all of the patients. After stopping steroids, the patients were followed up for a period of 12 months.
                Four patients failed to complete steroid withdrawal, three due to rejection, and one due to leukopenia. The proportion of rejection in three patients in group A (6.6%) was not significantly different from rejection in two patients in group B (4.8%). The mean value of serum creatinine was not significantly different in both groups in the course of follow-up. A finding of some degree of immunological activity in FNAB was made in four patients in each group, but none of these patients developed rejection. Compared with group B, significant decreases in serum cholesterol and blood leukocytes were observed in group A. Prednisone withdrawal did not have any influence on hypertension and serum triglycerides.
                Gradual withdrawal of steroids is not associated with a higher risk for rejection and has a beneficial effect on serum total cholesterol levels. FNAB was not a useful tool for predicting rejection. With tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, it appears safe to withdraw steroids 3 to 6 months after renal transplantation. We hypothesized whether steroids could also be safely withdrawn early after transplantation.
                Sixty-two patients (first or second transplant, with no previous immunological failure, and current panel reactive human leucocyte antigen [HLA] antibodies [PRA]<50%), treated with tacrolimus, were prospectively randomized to stop steroids (10 mg prednisolone) after day 7 posttransplantation (stop group [STOP], n=28) or to gradually wean off steroids in 3 to 6 months (tapering group [TAP], n=34). Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.
                After a median follow-up of 2.7 years, patient and graft survival were 97 and 90% and comparable between both groups (P =0.11 and P=0.13, respectively). The incidence of acute rejection was 29 (STOP) versus 33% (TAP) ( P=0.30). The time to the first rejection was a median of 35 days (STOP) versus 11 days (TAP) ( =0.19). The severity of the rejections (1997 Banff classification) was comparable (P =0.57). Creatinine clearance and proteinuria were similar (P >0.70). The incidence of infections was comparable ( P>0.10). The incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus, defined as the use of antidiabetic medication, was 8.0 (STOP) versus 30.3% (TAP) (P =0.04). All cases occurred in the STOP group after 1 year, while all cases occurred in TAP in the first 4 months ( P<0.001).
                Compared with tapering in 3 to 6 months, stopping steroids 1 week posttransplantation results in comparable patient and graft survival and in a similar incidence of acute rejections. The incidence of new-onset diabetes may be reduced. The immunosuppressive benefit of adding 10 mg prednisolone to tacrolimus seems to be limited. Corticosteroid therapy contributes significant toxicity to liver transplantation. The safety and efficacy of early steroid withdrawal were determined in patients treated with either tacrolimus or microemulsion cyclosporin A (micro-CsA). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who were steroid-free 1 year posttransplantation. From the seven Canadian adult liver transplant centers, 143 patients were randomly allocated oral treatment with either tacrolimus (n = 71) or micro-CsA (n = 72), together with corticosteroids and azathioprine. Eligibility criteria for steroid withdrawal included freedom from acute rejection for a minimum of 3 months, and prednisone </=0.15 mg/kg/d. In eligible patients, the daily steroid dose was reduced by 2.5 mg each month until complete discontinuation was achieved. At 1 year after transplantation, 75% of the tacrolimus patients and 63% of the micro-CsA patients were steroid-free (P =.20). Of all of the patients who became eligible for steroid withdrawal, steroid discontinuation was achieved in over 80%. One-year patient survival was 97% with tacrolimus and 89% with micro-CsA (P =.052). Graft survival was 97% and 86%, respectively (P =.017). The overall incidence of acute rejection during the first year was 35% with tacrolimus and 43% with micro-CsA (P =.26). There was no difference in survival, acute rejection, or rate of steroid withdrawal when adjusting for hepatitis C. All acute rejection episodes experienced during steroid withdrawal were steroid-responsive. Steroid-resistant rejection occurred in 5.6% of the tacrolimus and 9.7% of the micro-CsA patients. One patient, in the micro-CsA group, experienced refractory rejection. Chronic rejection was not observed in either group. The toxicity profiles were similar. Postoperative serum creatinine levels were similar, and dialysis was required in less than 10% of patients in each group. Infectious complications were similar in both groups. Neurotoxicity was a serious adverse event in 13% and 10% of patients receiving tacrolimus and micro-CsA, respectively. Early steroid withdrawal is safe and effective after liver transplantation using either tacrolimus plus azathioprine or micro-CsA plus azathioprine immunoprophylaxis. Our transplant centre began a prospective, randomized trial of steroid withdrawal in low risk renal transplant recipients on triple immunosuppression consisting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), microemulsion cyclosporine (CSA), and prednisone. One hundred and twenty patients were randomized either to discontinue or remain on steroids (60 patients per group). Study design consisted of analyses of 1-yr outcomes after study entry. This report includes the 1-yr results plus results at last follow-up (mean follow-up 3.7 yr). There were no significant differences in rates of patient and graft survival at 1 yr or at last follow-up. Additionally, the incidences of acute and chronic rejection as well as graft function were the same at 1 yr and at last follow-up. Significant improvement was noted in total serum cholesterol and bone density at 1 yr and last follow-up. Initial improvement in patient weight at 1 yr was not sustained at last follow-up. No significant impact of steroid withdrawal on serum triglycerides, blood pressure, or post-transplant diabetes mellitus was observed. To date, we have observed no immunologic risk, and some significant benefit in regards to side effects, of steroid withdrawal between 6 and 36 months after transplantation in low risk renal transplant recipients maintained on prednisone, MMF, and microemulsion CSA.
                Steroid withdrawal in low risk kidney transplant recipients is safe and ameliorates many of the unwanted sides effects of steroid use. A prospective randomized study was conducted to evaluate the impact of four different conversion protocols on graft outcome in long-term follow-up. Between January 1986 and May 1987, 128 patients with first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized at the time of transplantation to four treatment groups of 32 patients each, to be assigned 10 weeks post-transplantation. During the first 10 weeks, all patients received triple therapy with low-dose azathioprine (Aza), cyclosporin (CyA), and methylprednisolone (MP). After 10 weeks, one group continued with triple therapy (group A) while the three other groups received different combinations of two drugs, namely, Aza and CyA (group B), Aza and MP (group C), or CyA and MP (group D). Withdrawal of MP (group B) or especially of CyA (group C) was associated with 4/29 (14%) and 10/28 (36%) acute rejection episodes, respectively, for 60 days after conversion. All rejections were mild and reversible. There were no rejections after Aza withdrawal or in the group that continued on triple therapy during the corresponding time period. The most common reason for dropping out after withdrawal, for those patients who could not continue on the originally randomized medication, was azathioprine intolerance (n = 12). Five patients were switched back to triple therapy after CyA withdrawal due to rejection. Steroid intolerance was rare and CyA in low doses was very well tolerated. At 1 year there were no statistically significant differences in graft survival between groups A, B, C, and D--81%, 88%, 88%, and 88%, respectively--or in patient survival--88%, 88%, 88%, and 97%, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Corticosteroid therapy after renal transplantation is associated with many adverse effects. Newer immunosuppressive agents may allow for safe and effective reductions in dose or early steroid withdrawal.
                In this prospective, single-center clinical trial, 60 patients were randomized into 2 groups: control patients (n = 28), who received low doses of prednisone throughout, and study patients (n = 32), who were withdrawn from steroids 7 days posttransplant. Patients received a limited course of rabbit antilymphocyte globulin (rALG) induction therapy, tacrolimus (TAC), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Patients were followed for clinical outcomes and renal function. Protocol biopsies were performed at 1, 6, and 12 months.
                Clinical rejections occurred in 11% of controls and 13% of study patients. Renal function was well maintained and equivalent in both groups. In all, 111 protocol biopsies were performed without complications. Subclinical rejection was noted in only 2 protocol biopsies, and borderline changes were seen in 12 biopsies, all of which were distributed equally between both groups. Unsuspected acute TAC toxicity was seen in 8 biopsies. Protocol biopsies led to changes in therapy in 10% of patients. In both groups, serial protocol biopsies demonstrated increased allograft fibrosis over time, which was significant at 1 year in the steroid withdrawal group.
                The immunosuppressive combination of rALG, TAC, and MMF prevents subclinical rejection and the need for high doses of steroids after transplantation. However, continual low-dose steroid therapy may aid in preventing chronic allograft fibrosis. Protocol biopsies help define the short-term and long-term risks of steroid withdrawal therapy. Renal transplant recipients experience adverse events attributed to corticosteroid therapy.
                This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 6-month, controlled steroid dose-reduction study in renal transplant recipients with an unblinded 6-month follow-up. In the low/stop arm, corticoste. roids were given at half the dosage of control for 3 months from the date of transplantation, and then withdrawn. Both arms received mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine. The primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 6 months posttransplantation.
                There were 248 patients in the control group and 252 in the low/stop group. At 6 months the low/stop group had more biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes than the control (23% vs. 14%; P=0.008). At 12 months this increased to 25% vs. 15%. Most rejections were Banff grade I. Twelve-month graft loss was 5% in the low/stop group vs. 4% in the control. At 6 and 12 months serum cholesterol (P<0.01, P<0.01), triglycer. ides (P<0.01, P<0.01), and systolic blood pressure (P<0.001, P<0.001) were lower in the low/stop group. Diastolic pressure was lower (P<0.01) and lumbar spine bone density was greater (P<0.01) in the low/ stop group at 12 months.
                In renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine, reduction and early withdrawal of the prophylactic corticosteroid dose is feasible without an unacceptable increase in serious rejection episodes. This is accompanied by a significant reduction of steroid-related adverse events. The combination of cyclosporin, azathioprine, and prednisolone (triple immunosuppression) is the most commonly used immunosuppressive regimen early after renal transplantation, but the risks and benefits of maintaining the steroid component of this regimen in the long term are uncertain.
                A randomised controlled trial of steroid withdrawal was conducted among renal transplant patients receiving triple immunosuppression. Between one and six years after transplantation, 100 such patients were randomised either to reduce prednisolone treatment to zero over about four months or to maintain their triple immunosuppression unchanged. Outcome was analysed according to "Intention-to-treat".
                In 42 (86%) of 49 patients allocated to steroid withdrawal, complete steroid withdrawal was achieved. Although these patients did not experience defined acute rejection episodes, insidious increases in plasma creatinine were observed more frequently in this group than in the controls. In 97 patients surviving one year after trial entry, plasma creatinine exceeded the baseline by more than 25% at some time in the first year in 25 (53%) of 47 in the steroid withdrawal group compared with 9 (18%) of 50 in the control group (p < 0.001, chi-square test). In some cases these increases were transient. However, when corrected for the baseline (entry) value significant differences between groups were apparent in both mean plasma creatinine and mean creatinine clearance; mean (SD) plasma creatinine values at entry, immediately after withdrawal, and at one year were 138 (27), 151 (36), and 150 (36) mumol/L in the steroid withdrawal group versus 138 (34), 140 (51), and 139 (47) mumol/L in the control group (p = 0.017, analysis of covariance). Steroid withdrawal patients showed a further rise in mean plasma creatinine to 160 (44) and 161 (65) mumol/L at two and three years from trial entry. Changes in several clinical and metabolic indices were also observed in association with steroid withdrawal. Blood pressure declined but the reduction was incompletely sustained, being more evident immediately after steroid withdrawal than at one year. Total cholesterol declined about 1 mmol/L in the steroid withdrawal group. Other changes associated with steroid withdrawal were reductions in white cell count and haemoglobin and increases in plasma phosphate and alkaline phosphatase.
                Late steroid withdrawal is feasible in most patients with stable graft function on triple immunosuppression and has potentially beneficial metabolic effects. However, a substantial proportion of patients show a reduction in graft function, indicating a need for caution in considering the long term outcome. Prospective randomized trials have shown a reduced rate of acute rejection (AR) in mycophenolate mofetil-treated kidney transplant recipients. We hypothesized that this increased protection from AR could allow successful prednisone (P) withdrawal in cyclosporine/mycophenolate mofetil/P-treated recipients.
                A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of P withdrawal at 3 months post-transplant was initiated. Entry criteria were: primary transplant, adult, no AR by 90 days, mycophenolate mofetil dose > or =2 g/day, cyclosporine dose = 5-15 mg/kg/ day, P dose = 10-15 mg/day. Study participants were randomized to have P tapered over 8 weeks (beginning at 3 months posttransplant) to 0 vs. 10 mg/day. Prestudy power analysis determined 500 recipients should be randomized for 80% statistical power to test equivalence of the primary endpoint, AR, or treatment failure at 1 year posttransplant. By design, the study was to be stopped if interim data precluded reaching equivalence. An established data safety monitoring board monitored the study.
                After 266 patients were enrolled, the patient enrollment was stopped (after safety monitoring board review) because of excess rejection in the P withdrawal group. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative incidence of rejection or treatment failure within 1 year posttransplant (+/-95% confidence interval) for the maintenance group was 9.8% (4.4%; treatment failure, 14.9%); for the withdrawal group, 30.8% (21.0%; 39.3%). Treatment differences in the distribution of time to event were highly significant (P = 0.0007). Of note, risk was higher in blacks (39.6%) versus nonblacks (16.0%) (P<0.001). At 1 year post-transplant, there was no difference between groups in patient or graft survival. For the patients with functioning grafts at 6 months posttransplant, withdrawal patients had lower cholesterol (P = 0.0005), had higher creatinine (P = 0.03), and were less likely to use antihypertensives (P = 0.001). These differences persist to 1 yr posttransplant.
                We conclude that for recipients on cyclosporine/mycophenolate mofetil/P with no AR at 90 days, the chance of developing subsequent AR is small; if P is tapered and withdrawn, the risk increases (but the majority remain free of acute and chronic rejection). After withdrawal, the risk of AR is different for blacks versus nonblacks. Withdrawal patients had a lower cholesterol level and less need for antihypertensives. Morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular disease are major problems after renal transplantation. The effects of three immunosuppressive protocols on cardiovascular end points were investigated in a single-center, randomized, parallel (1-1-1) group. Acute rejection was a secondary safety endpoint. Groups were as follows: group one, tacrolimus+sirolimus; group two, tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF); group three, sirolimus+MMF+daclizumab. All groups received two days methylprednisolone only. The Ethical Committee demanded an interim analysis when 50% of the patients were included. In this analysis, 54 patients with a median follow-up of 9.2 months were studied. The Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed a difference in rejection free survival between group one (82%) and group three (34%, P=0.03) and between groups one and two (tacrolimus-based, 76%) and group three (calcineurin-free, 34%, P=0.04). Calcineurin-free immunosuppression with two days of steroids only showed an unacceptable high incidence of acute rejection and re-rejection, and the study had to be stopped. We evaluated whether the regulatory function of CD4(+)CD25(high+)FoxP3(+) T-cells from patients on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is affected by preceding steroid and anti-CD25 mAb induction therapy and whether this function is associated with rejection after kidney transplantation. Kidney recipients (N=15) were randomized to receive either anti-CD25 mAb induction (i.e., daclizumab) or steroids for 4 months. We analyzed the presence and suppressive activity of CD4(+)CD25(high+)FoxP3(+) peripheral T-cells in samples obtained at pre and 4-6 months after transplantation. Anti-CD25 mAb therapy and treatment with steroids did not significantly affect protein expression of FoxP3. However, at the functional level, significant differences were found in the regulatory activities of CD4(+)CD25(high+) T-cells from the anti-CD25 group vs those from the steroid group. At 4-6 months after transplantation, the regulatory activities of CD4(+)CD25(high+) T-cells were comparable to those before anti-CD25 mAb therapy; 49+/-13% (mean+/-SEM) vs 40+/-14% at a 1:20 ratio (CD25(high+):CD25(-/dim)), respectively. In contrast, the regulatory capacities of CD(+)D25(bright+) T-cells from the steroid patient group became significantly impaired. The percentage inhibition of the anti-donor response decreased from 57+/-12% before transplantation to 12+/-7% after transplantation (p<0.01). Five out of 15 patients experienced a rejection episode. At 4-6 months after transplantation, the CD25(high+) cells from these rejectors (who all received daclizumab induction therapy) had clear regulatory function, while suppression by CD25(high+) cells from non-rejectors (N=10) was significantly lower. The percentage inhibition of the anti-donor response was 48+/-14% (mean+/-SEM) vs 10+/-7%, respectively, p=0.02. Anti-CD25 mAb induction therapy does not negatively influence the regulatory function of CD4(+)CD25(high+)FoxP3(+) T-cells from kidney transplant recipients on tacrolimus and MMF. The majority of these patients experienced an acute rejection episode, which suggests that immune activation is required for persistent immunoregulatory function. New trends in immunosuppression in clinical transplantation include the use of antibody induction agents in protocols that emphasize reduction or avoidance of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors.
                In a randomized trial using three different antibody induction agents in 90 first renal transplant recipients from cadaver donors, group A received Thymoglobulin, group B received Alemtuzumab, and group C received Daclizumab. Maintenance immunosuppression included tacrolimus and mycophenolate in all three arms, and methylprednisolone in groups A and C only (standard clinical institutional practice). The targeted trough level of tacrolimus was between 8 and 10 ng/mL for groups A and C, respectively, with a targeted mycophenolate dose of 1 g twice daily. However, in group B, the target tacrolimus trough level was 4 to 7 ng/mL to reduce long-term nephrotoxicity, with 500 mg twice-daily doses of mycophenolate, without steroid maintenance.
                In this 15-month median postoperative interval report, there were no notable differences in demographics and patient and graft survivals. Acute rejection rates at 1 year were equivalent, that is, 5 of 30 in all three groups (16.6%). In group B, there was slightly lower renal function at 1 month, but no difference at 1 year. There was also significantly more leukopenia, but a greater percentage of T-regulatory cells and number of Fox-P3 mRNA copies by flow cytometry and semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis, respectively, in group B.
                This preliminary analysis indicates that 80% of the patients in group B remained steroid-free 1 year postoperatively, with lower tacrolimus trough levels and no difference in other adverse events. The aim of this work was to investigate the benefit of basiliximab induction therapy in living-related-donor kidney transplantation.
                One hundred adult recipients of a first kidney allograft were randomized into two treatment groups, one to receive basiliximab and the second as a control. All patients received maintenance triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, cyclosporine microemulsion and azathioprine). The patients were followed up for a minimum of three years. The end points for evaluation included the incidence of acute rejection episodes, severity of rejection, cumulative steroid dose, patients' and graft survival.
                Basiliximab significantly reduced the proportion of patients who experienced an acute rejection in the first year (18/50) compared to the control group (31/50). At three years there were 26 acute rejections in the basiliximab group and 36 in control group. The cumulative steroid dose at three and 12 months was significantly lower in the basiliximab group. The overall incidence of post-transplant complications was comparable in the two groups.
                Prophylactic basiliximab is well tolerated and significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes in living-related-donor kidney transplantation. This study prospectively compared immunoprophylaxis with a single intraoperative dose (2 mg/kg) of monoclonal interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antibody vs. noninduction in kidney transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus (FK 506), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and a prednisone-based immunosuppression regimen. One hundred recipients of first-kidney transplant were enrolled into the study to receive either anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibody, daclizumab (2 mg/kg intraoperatively, limited anti-IL-2R) or no induction (control). Each patient also received oral tacrolimus (dosed to target trough level 10-15 ng/mL), MMF (500 mg bid) and prednisone. The primary efficacy end-point was the incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection during the first 6 months post-transplant. The patients were also followed for 12-month graft function, and graft and patient survival rates. Other than the donor's age being significantly lower in the control group, both groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, gender, race, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR mismatch, panel reactive antibody (%PRA), cold ischemic time, cytomegalovirus (CMV) status, causes of renal failure, and duration and modes of renal replacement therapy (RRT). During the first 6 months, episodes of first biopsy confirmed acute rejection was 3/50 (6%) in the limited anti-IL-2R group and 8/50 (16%) in the controls (p < 0.05). Twelve-month patient 100/98 (%) and graft survival 100/96 (%) were not statistically different. The group receiving limited anti-IL-2R did not have any adverse reactions. Our study demonstrates that a limited (single) 2 mg/kg immunoprophylaxis dose with monoclonal IL-2R antibody (daclizumab) when combined with tacrolimus/MMF/steroid allows significant reduction in early renal allograft rejection to the single digit level. The therapy with anti-IL-2R antibody is simple and is well tolerated. Acute steroid-resistant rejection episodes in kidney allograft recipients require treatment with antilymphocyte antibodies. Monoclonal anti-CD3 and polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies have been widely used but seldom compared. Recent data have suggested that these antibodies could be used at reduced doses without jeopardizing their efficacy. In this study, we randomized renal transplant recipients who encountered a first acute steroid-resistant rejection episode to low-dose ATG or low-dose OKT3 treatment. Sixty patients were enrolled in the study. They received prophylactic immunosuppression with cyclosporin, azathioprine, and prednisolone. Treatment of biopsy-proven rejection consisted of a 10-day course of either ATG (n = 31) or OKT3 (n = 29). The total ATG dose was 484 +/- 110 mg, i.e., 0.75 mg/kg per day. The total OKT3 dose was 32 +/- 4 mg, i.e., 0.05 mg/kg per day. We compared reversion of rejection, side effects, immunodepression, and graft function. Reversion of rejection was similar in the two groups, although we noted a trend in favor of ATG. Results were 3% vs 10% early graft failures, 13% vs 23% overall graft failures, 28% vs 38% 3-month actuarial incidence of rebound rejection, and 89% vs 81% 1-year graft survival rate in the ATG and OKT3 groups, respectively. Tolerance was worse in the OKT3 group due to the first-dose syndrome. Infections and cancers occurred with the same frequency. ATG resulted in a deeper and longer decrease in peripheral lymphocyte subsets. Graft function was similar in the two groups. We conclude that low-dose ATG and low-dose OKT3 are equally effective in reversing steroid-resistant acute rejection. Tolerance was better with ATG, which also gave a more potent and longlasting immunodepression. The use of reduced doses of ATG and OKT3 did not appear to lessen their efficacy. Uncertainty exists regarding the necessity of continuing triple therapy consisting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine (CsA), and prednisone (Pred) after kidney transplantation (RTx). At 6 mo after RTx, 212 patients were randomized to stop CsA (n = 63), stop Pred (n = 76), or continue triple drug therapy (n = 73). The MMF dose was 1000 mg twice daily, target CsA trough levels were 150 ng/ml, and Pred dose was 0.10 mg/kg per d. Follow-up was until 24 mo after RTx. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 14 (22%) of 63 patients after CsA withdrawal compared with 3 (4%) of 76 in the Pred withdrawal group (P = 0.001) and 1 (1.4%) of 73 in the control group (P = 0.0001). Biopsy-proven chronic rejection was present in one patient in the control group, in nine patients after CsA withdrawal (P = 0.006 versus control group); and in four patients after discontinuation of Pred (NS). Graft loss occurred in two versus one patient after CsA or Pred withdrawal, respectively, and in two patients in the control group (NS). Patients who successfully withdrew CsA had a significantly lower serum creatinine during follow-up. Pred withdrawal resulted in a reduction in mean arterial pressure, and the total cholesterol/HDL ratio increased. In conclusion, rapid CsA withdrawal at 6 mo after RTx results in a significantly increased incidence of biopsy-proven acute and chronic rejection. Pred withdrawal was safe and resulted in a reduction in mean arterial pressure. However, patient and graft survival and renal function 2 yr after RTx were not different among groups. In this randomized trial renal transplant recipients were treated with basiliximab, everolimus 3 mg/day, low-dose CsA. At transplantation, patients were randomized to stop steroids at the seventh day (group A) or to continue oral steroids in low doses (group B). Of the 113 patients enrolled, 65 were randomized to group A and 68 to group B. All patients were followed for 2 years. During the study 28 (43%) group A patients required reintroduced corticosteroids. One patient died, in group B. The Graft survival rate was 97% in group A and 90% in group B. There were more biopsy-proven rejections in group A (32% vs 16%; P = .044). The mean creatinine clearance was 54 +/- 21 mL/min in group A vs 56 +/- 22 mL/min in group B. Mean levels of serum cholesterol tended to be lower in group A, but the difference was of borderline significance (191 +/- 91 vs 251 +/- 188 mg/dL; P = .07). Vascular thrombosis (0 vs 5) and pneumonia requiring hospitalization (2 vs 7) tended to be more frequent in group B. Only three cases of CMV infection (1 vs 2) occurred. An immunosuppressive therapy with everolimus and low-dose CsA allows one to obtain excellent renal graft survival and stable graft function at 2 years. Early interruption of steroids in patients treated with this regimen may increase the risk of acute rejection, but neither affects graft survival nor graft function, while possibly reducing the risk of hyperlipemia and vascular thrombosis. About 60% of patients given everolimus and low-dose CsA can definitively stop steroids after 1 week. In a prospective trial 151 recipients of renal transplants were randomly assigned to treatment with CsA alone (74 patients) and to low dose of AZA, prednisolone, and CsA (77 patients). At two years, graft survival was 84% for the monotherapy and 90% for the triple therapy. This difference was not statistically significant. The number of rejection episodes was similar in the two groups, but the severity of rejection was significantly worse among the patients on monotherapy. More kidneys were lost because of rejection (6 versus 3), and a higher number of methylprednisolone pulses was used for treating rejection (5.2 +/- 2.3 versus 4.3 +/- 2.9; P = 0.0077). CsA nephrotoxicity episodes were more frequent among patients on monotherapy (23 versus 7; P less than 0.02). Infectious episodes were equally distributed between the two groups. Creatinine clearance was poorer in the monotherapy-treated patients at the third month (42 +/- 16 ml/min versus 48 +/- 15 ml/min; P = 0.02), but no differences were observed between the two groups since the sixth month after transplantation. Many patients on monotherapy required changes in maintenance therapy. In fact, one patient was switched to conventional immunosuppression because of Cremophor-induced anaphylaxis. Another patient who developed Kaposi's sarcoma 4 months after surgery was switched to steroids alone. Excluding 5 patients who lost their grafts a few days after transplantation, only 30 of 74 patients (40%) could be kept without steroids. We conclude that both the therapeutic protocols can give good results in renal allotransplantation; however, monotherapy could create some problems in keeping the balance between drug toxicity and significant immunosuppression. On the contrary, triple therapy is easier to handle, especially in the early posttransplant period when the differential diagnosis between acute rejection and CsA-related nephrotoxicity can be difficult even for a skilled clinician. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of basiliximab (Simulect) as immunosuppressive induction therapy for the prevention of acute allograft rejection among sensitized kidney recipients.
                Fifty-six adult recipients receiving cadaveric kidney transplant with panel reactive antibody class I ranging from 30% to 50% and or class II 30% to 80% were randomized at about a 2:1 ratio to the Simulect group (36 patients) or matching control group (20 patients). All patients received baseline triple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine (Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Simulect was given in two doses of 20 mg each on day 0 (2 hours before operation) and day 4 after transplantation.
                There was no hyperacute rejection in either group and delayed graft function occurred in three control patients. The incidence of acute rejection during the first 3 months was 11.1% in the Simulect group compared with 50% in the placebo group (77.8% reduction, P < .01). No apparent adverse and toxic events were recorded in the Simulect group. The mean daily dose of steroids was significantly higher in the control group 2 to 4 weeks posttransplantation. No clinically meaningful differences in the mean dose of cyclosporine were observed between the two groups; in addition, there were no statistically significant differences in the rate of patient or graft survival.
                On the basis of appropriate selection of the donor and recipient, Simulect is effective and safety for the sensitized recipients as immunosuppressive induction therapy. Currently available immunosuppressive regimens for cadaver-kidney recipients are far from ideal because acute-rejection episodes occur in about 30% to 50% of these patients. In the phase III study described here we assessed the ability of basiliximab, a chimeric interleukin (IL)-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, to prevent acute-rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients.
                380 adult recipients of a primary cadaveric kidney transplant were randomly allocated, in this double-blind trial, to receive a 20 mg infusion of basiliximab on day 0 (day of surgery) and on day 4, to provide IL-2-receptor suppression for 4-6 weeks (n=193), or to receive placebo (n=187). Both groups received baseline dual immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporin and steroids throughout the study. The primary outcome measure was incidence of acute-rejection episodes during the 6 months after transplantation. Safety and tolerability were monitored over the 12 months of the study.
                376 patients were eligible for intention-to-treat analysis (basiliximab, n=190; placebo, n=186). No significant differences in patient characteristics were apparent. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection 6 months after transplantation was 51 (29.8%) of 171 in the basiliximab group compared with 73 (44.0%) of 166 in the placebo group (32% reduction; 14.2% difference [95% Kaplan-Meier CIs 3% to 24%], p=0.012). The incidence of steroid-resistant first rejection episodes that required antibody therapy was significantly lower in the basiliximab group (10% vs 23.1%, 13.1% difference [5.4% to 20.8%], p<0.001). At weeks 2 and 4 post-transplantation, the mean daily dose of steroids was significantly higher in the placebo group (p<0.001 with one-way analysis of variance). The incidence of graft loss at 12 months post-transplantation was 23 (12.1%) of 190 in the basiliximab group and 25 (13.4%) of 186 in the placebo group (1.3% difference [-5% to 9%], p=0.591). The incidence of infection and other adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups. The acute tolerability of basiliximab was excellent, with no evidence of cytokine-release syndrome. 14 deaths (basiliximab n=9; placebo n=5; -2.0% difference [-6% to 2%], p=0.293) occurred during the 12-month study and a further three deaths (basiliximab n=1; placebo n=2) occurred within the 380-day cut-off period. One post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder was recorded in each group.
                Prophylaxis with 40 mg basiliximab reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes significantly, with no clinically relevant safety or tolerability concerns. Since the murine monoclonal antibody OKT3 reacts with human T cells and blocks their function, we explored its effectiveness in treating T-cell-mediated rejection of renal allografts. In a prospective randomized multicenter trial, 123 patients undergoing acute rejection of cadaveric renal transplants were treated either with OKT3 daily for a mean of 14 days, with concomitant lowering of the dosage of other immunosuppressive drugs (63 patients), or with conventional high-dose steroids (60 patients). OKT3 reversed 94 per cent of the rejections--a figure that was significantly better (P = 0.009) than the 75 per cent reversal rate obtained with conventional steroid treatment. This superior reversal rate with OKT3 was reflected in an improved one-year graft survival of 62 per cent for the OKT3-treated group, as compared with 45 per cent for the steroid-treated group (P = 0.029), in patients who were all selected by virtue of having had acute rejection. We conclude that treatment with OKT3 (with concomitant lowering of the dosage of other immunosuppressive drugs) is an effective approach for acute renal-allograft rejection.
This review confirms that steroid avoidance and steroid withdrawal strategies in kidney transplantation are not associated with increased mortality or graft loss despite an increase in acute rejection. These immunosuppression strategies may allow safe steroid avoidance or elimination a few days after kidney transplantation if antibody induction treatment is prescribed or after three to six months if such induction is not used.