Comparison of live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccines in cystic fibrosis patients and their families: results of a 3-year study. Influenza immunization in children with cystic fibrosis. Repeated aerosolized AAV-CFTR for treatment of cystic fibrosis: a randomized placebo-controlled phase 2B trial. Prospective, controlled study of a polyvalent pseudomonas vaccine in cystic fibrosis--three year results.
Forty-one cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and 89 family members were immunized in a double-blind randomized 3-year trial with either intranasal live cold-adapted (ca) influenza A vaccine or the recommended intramuscular trivalent inactivated (triv) influenza vaccine. Local, respiratory, and systemic symptoms after vaccine were infrequent and did not differ between vaccine groups. CF patients did not differ from family members in immune response to either vaccine. Although antibody responses tended to be higher after triv vaccine, > or = 85% of subjects had mean hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers > or = 1:32 to influenza H1N1 and H3N2 after the first dose of either vaccine. Infection with influenza H3N2 viruses circulating during this study occurred with comparable low frequency in CF patients after ca (14 infections/100 subject-years of observation) or triv vaccine (10 infections/100 subject-years of observation). Influenza A ca vaccines appear to be safe, immunogenic alternatives to influenza A inactivated vaccines for CF patients and their families. Nineteen children with cystic fibrosis and aged between 5 and 13 years were randomized to receive two doses at monthly intervals of either a split-virion influenza vaccine (MFV-Ject, Institut Merieux) or a sub-unit vaccine (Fluvirin, Evans). In those completing the study, there was a satisfactory serological response. There was no statistically significant difference between the immunogenicity of the two vaccines as evaluated by haemagglutination inhibition or single radial haemolysis tests. The incidence of local side-effects was similar in the two groups. Previous studies have demonstrated that delivery of a recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector encoding the complete human cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) cDNA (tgAAVCF) to the nose, sinus, and lungs of subjects with cystic fibrosis (CF) was safe and well tolerated. In a small randomized, double-blind study of three doses of aerosolized tgAAVCF or placebo at 30-day intervals, encouraging but non-significant trends in pulmonary function and induced sputum interleukin 8 (IL-8) levels were seen at early time points. This larger study was conducted to verify these trends. One hundred and two subjects aged 12 years and older with mild-to-moderate cystic fibrosis (forced expiratory flow in 1 sec [FEV1]:60% predicted) were randomized to two aerosolized doses of 1x10(13)DNase-resistant particles of tgAAVCF (n=51) or matching placebo (n=51) administered 30 days apart. Although tgAAVCF was well tolerated, the study did not meet its primary efficacy end point of statistically significant improvement in FEV1 30 days after initial administration of tgAAVCF compared with placebo. There were no significant differences in spirometric lung function over time, induced sputum biologic markers, or days of antibiotic use in either treatment group. Thus repeated doses of aerosolized tgAAVCF were safe and well tolerated, but did not result in significant improvement in lung function over time. Because gene transfer is the simplest, most basic way to correct the underlying genetic defect that leads to disease in CF, further research is warranted to develop an effective gene transfer agent for the treatment of CF. Thirty four children with cystic fibrosis allocated to pseudomonas vaccine and control groups were studied for three years. No significant differences were observed in the numbers colonised by Pseudomonas aeruginosa or in the overall disease progress of the two groups.
There is currently no evidence from randomised studies that influenza vaccine given to people with cystic fibrosis is of benefit to them. There remains a need for a well-constructed clinical study, that assesses the effectiveness of influenza vaccination on important clinical outcome measures.