Randomized trial of donor human milk versus preterm formula as substitutes for mothers' own milk in the feeding of extremely premature infants. Randomized outcome trial of human milk fortification and developmental outcome in preterm infants. Improved bone mineralization and growth in premature infants fed fortified own mother's milk. Growth, biochemical status, and mineral metabolism in very-low-birth-weight infants receiving fortified preterm human milk. Changes in growth and metabolism in very low birthweight infants fed with fortified breast milk.
Compared with preterm formula (PF), mother's milk (MM) is associated with lower rates of late-onset sepsis (LOS) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) among premature infants. Because not all mothers of premature infants produce sufficient milk to supply their infants throughout hospitalization, we reasoned that pasteurized donor human milk (DM) would be a suitable alternative.
                Extremely premature infants (<30 weeks of gestation) whose mothers intended to breastfeed were assigned randomly to receive either pasteurized DM or PF if the supply of their own MM became insufficient during the study (birth to 90 days of age or hospital discharge). Infection-related events (LOS, NEC, meningitis, presumed sepsis, or urinary tract infection) that occurred after the attainment of a milk intake of 50 mL/kg, dietary intake, growth, skin-to-skin contact, and duration of hospital stay were compared. The primary analysis compared groups DM and PF on an intent-to-treat basis. If no differences were noted, then these groups were combined and compared with the reference group, group MM. If differences were noted, then the subsequent analyses compared each group with group MM.
                Of 243 infants, 70 (29%) received only MM; group DM included 81 infants and group PF included 92 infants. Because of poor weight gain, 17 infants (21%), all in group DM, were switched to PF. There were no differences in birth weight, gestational age, multiple births, and age at attainment of feeding of 50 mL/kg among groups. There were no differences between group DM and group PF in LOS and/or NEC, other infection-related events, hospital stay, or number of deaths. Group DM received a greater intake of milk and more nutritional supplements but had a slower rate of weight gain, compared with group PF. Compared with groups DM and PF, group MM had fewer episodes of LOS and/or NEC and total infection-related events and a shorter duration of hospital stay. Group MM also had fewer Gram-negative organisms isolated from blood cultures than did the other groups.
                In this randomized, blinded trial of feeding of extremely premature infants, we found that, as a substitute for MM, DM offered little observed short-term advantage over PF for feeding extremely premature infants. Advantages to an exclusive diet of MM were observed in terms of fewer infection-related events and shorter hospital stays. Despite potential benefits, human milk may fail to meet preterm infants' nutrient requirements. We tested the hypothesis that fortified breast milk, fed alone or with preterm formula, would improve neurodevelopment and growth at 18-mo follow-up without adverse short-term clinical or biochemical consequences. Two hundred seventy-five preterm infants from two medical centers (birth weight < 1850 g; mean gestation 29.8 +/- 2.7 wk) whose mothers chose to provide breast milk were randomly assigned to receive for a mean of 39 d a multinutrient fortifier or control supplement containing phosphate and vitamins. Breast milk comprised 47.6% and 46.4% of enteral intake in fortified and control groups, respectively; preterm formula supplements were used when insufficient breast milk was available. Overall, there were no significant growth advantages with fortification; although, when breast milk exceeded 50% of intake, fortification promoted faster weight gain (an advantage of 1.6 g.kg-1.d-1; 95% CI: 0.1, 3.1; P < 0.05). Compared with control infants, the fortified group showed 1) higher plasma urea from week 2 (P = 0.04), 2) higher plasma calcium (mean 2.34 +/- 0.01 compared with 2.27 +/- 0.02 mmol/L; P = 0.003), 3) a greater rise in alkaline phosphatase by week 6 (P = 0.04), 4) more clinical infections (suspected plus proven; 43% compared with 31%, P = 0.04), 5) a nonsignificantly increased incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (5.8% compared with 2.2%, P = 0.12), and 6) higher white cell and platelet counts. Developmental scores at 18 mo were slightly but not significantly higher in the fortified group. This study confirmed that breast milk fortifiers can improve short-term growth (when breast milk intakes are high); but beneficial effects on long-term development remained unproven. Future research is required to evaluate potential adverse consequences and explore more optimal fortification strategies. "Preterm" human milk fortified with protein (0.85 gm/dL), calcium (90 mg/dL), and phosphorus (45 mg/dL) was compared with unfortified preterm human milk as a feeding for low birth weight infants. Additionally, a special formula for low birth weight infants (Similac Special Care (SC), 20 cal/oz), was compared with a standard 20 cal/oz formula (Similac). Bone mineral content (BMC), as measured by photon absorptiometry, improved in the study groups fed fortified human milk and Similac SC formula during the first 6 weeks of full oral feedings. Even though the intakes of calcium in the groups fed fortified human milk and Similac SC formula approached the intrauterine requirement for Ca during the third trimester of pregnancy (150 mg/kg/d), the values for BMC in these two groups (37 to 39 mg/cm) at the completion of the study were still considerably less than the intrauterine values for radial BMC at 36 to 37 weeks gestational age (72.6 +/- 14.1 mg/cm). Furthermore, the relative phosphorus deficiency (as determined by increased urinary Ca excretion and increased renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate) in the human milk groups occurred with or without supplements of Ca and P. Rate of weight gain in the fortified human milk group was greater than that of the unfortified human milk group and was comparable to that of infants fed Similac SC formula. Rate of weight gain for the unfortified human milk group was similar to that of infants fed Similac formula containing 20 cal/oz. However, none of the four feeding groups exceeded the 50th percentile for weight at the time of discharge (36 to 37 weeks postconceptional age). The results suggest that fortifying preterm human milk with Ca, P, and protein for low birth weight infants will improve bone mineralization and rate of growth to levels comparable to those achieved with a special formula containing high amounts of protein, Ca, and P. We compared the growth, biochemical status, and mineral status of 30 very-low-birth-weight infants randomly assigned to receive preterm human milk (Group I, 10 infants) from their own mothers, fortified preterm human milk (Group II, 8 infants), or a high-caloric-density premature formula (Group III, 12 infants). Added to the infant's own mother's milk, a human milk fortifier at full strength provided additional protein (60:40 whey/casein, 0.7 g/dl), calories (4 kcal/oz), and minerals. Volume of intake, feeding tolerance, and complications were similar in the three groups. Infants receiving fortified preterm human milk showed growth, biochemical status, and mineral status similar to those receiving high-caloric-density formula, but infants receiving fortified preterm human milk grew faster (12.0 +/- 3.2 vs. 8.9 +/- 1.1 days/300 g, p less than 0.05), had higher serum protein (4.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 4.2 +/- 0.2 g/dl, p less than 0.05), and tended to have better mineral status (higher serum calcium, lower alkaline phosphatase, and higher serum phosphorus, none individually significant) than infants receiving preterm human milk alone. This study supports previous observations that fortified preterm human milk provides nutritional advantages for very-low-birth-weight infants. Human milk is often inadequate nutritionally for preterm infants. We investigated the effect of adding a commercially prepared milk fortifier to human (maternal or bank) milk and measured changes in lower leg length velocity (LLLvel) using knemometry, weight gain and biochemical indices of nutrition. Babies were allocated to one of three feed groups, in a semi-randomized fashion, to receive human milk alone (group I), fortified human milk (group II) or a preterm formula (group III). The birthweights (median and R) and birth gestations (median and R) of the three groups were as follows: group I 1099 g (654-1248 g) and 28 wk (26-32 wk); group II 838 g (742-1340g) and 31 wk (28-36); group III 1136g (624-1552g) and 32 wk (27-36 wk). All babies who received fortified milk either showed significant (p = 0.0004) acceleration in LLLvel during the period studied, or maintained their pre-study period velocity. This increase in LLLvel was comparable to that achieved by a group of babies given a standard preterm infant formula (p < 0.001). By comparison, the control group's change in LLLvel was more modest (p = 0.04). Babies who received human milk with the fortifier added had the lowest serum levels of alkaline phosphatase at the end of the study period when compared to the other two groups. Other biochemical indices were similar in the three feed groups. No adverse clinical events were encountered which could be attributed to the use of the breast milk fortifier.
In preterm and low birth weight infants, feeding with formula milk compared with donor breast milk results in a higher rate of short-term growth but also a higher risk of developing necrotising enterocolitis. There are only limited data on the comparison of feeding with formula milk versus nutrient-fortified donor breast milk. This limits the applicability of the findings as nutrient fortification of breast milk is now a common practice in neonatal care. Future trials may compare growth, development and adverse outcomes in infants who receive formula milk versus nutrient-fortified donor breast milk given as a supplement to maternal expressed breast milk or as a sole diet.