Transabdominal amnioinfusion in preterm premature rupture of membranes: a randomised controlled trial. Prophylactic intrapartum amnioinfusion: a randomized clinical trial. Induction of labour: a randomised clinical trial of amniotomy versus amniotomy with oxytocin infusion.
To evaluate the role of transabdominal amnioinfusion in improving the perinatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM).
                A randomised controlled trial.
                A teaching hospital in Italy, obstetric unit. Population Women with singleton pregnancies complicated by pPROM, between 24 + 0 and 32 + 6 weeks of gestation.
                Patients were randomised 24 hours after admission to our referral hospital, to expectant management with transabdominal amnioinfusion or expectant management only.
                The effects of transabdominal amnioinfusion on pPROM-delivery interval and on perinatal outcomes.
                Of the 65 women with pPROM 34 met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen women were assigned to amnioinfusion (the amnioinfusion group) and the other 17 to expectant management. Compared with the control group (median: 8 days; range: 3-14), the pPROM-delivery period was significantly longer in women who underwent amnioinfusion (median: 21 days; range: 15-29) (P < 0.05). Women with amnioinfusion were less likely to deliver within seven days since pPROM (RR: 0.18; range: 0.04-0.69 95% CI) or within two weeks (RR: 0.46; range: 0.21-1.02 95% CI). In the amnioinfusion group the neonatal survival was significantly higher at each gestational age (P < 0.01, Yates's correction for Log Rank Test) with a reduction in pulmonary hypoplasia.
                We demonstrated that compared with standard expectant management the treatment with transabdominal amnioinfusion after pPROM resulted in significant prolongation of pregnancy and better neonatal outcomes. Amnioinfusion was performed in a prospective, randomized trial of 60 women in the latent phase of labor with oligohydramnios, as defined by an amniotic fluid index less than or equal to 5.0 cm. All fetuses were at least 37 weeks' gestational age, had normal baseline fetal heart rate variability, and no clinically significant fetal heart rate decelerations at the outset. Subjects in the amnioinfusion group (n = 30) were titrated to and maintained at an amniotic fluid index level greater than or equal to 8.0 cm throughout labor. In the group receiving amnioinfusion, significantly lower rates of meconium passage (p = 0.04), severe variable decelerations (p = 0.04), end-stage bradycardia (p = 0.05), and operative delivery for fetal distress (p = 0.002) occurred. Significantly higher umbilical arterial blood pH values were also noted in the infusion group (p = 0.02). We conclude that prophylactic intrapartum amnioinfusion is an important technique for the reduction of intrapartum morbidity. To compare two methods of induction of labour-amniotomy with oxytocin infusion versus amniotomy alone.
                Prospective randomised clinical trial.
                The department of obstetrics in a Swedish central hospital.
                One hundred and ninety-six pregnant women with indication for induction of labour at term and a favourable cervix (modified Bishop score > or = 6).
                The women were randomised to amniotomy followed by oxytocin infusion after 1 h (group A, n = 98) or amniotomy alone (group B, n = 98). If labour had not ensued on the following morning, after approximately 24 h, the women in group B were given an oxytocin infusion.
                Induction-delivery interval, duration of labour, time spent in delivery ward, oxytocin use, maternal and neonatal clinical outcome.
                Amniotomy combined with early oxytocin infusion resulted in shorter induction-delivery interval (median 6.0 h; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.0 to 6.5 h) than amniotomy alone (median 9.0 h; 95% CI 7.5 to 10.0 h). This was due to a shorter latent period in the former group (median 2.3 h; 95% CI 2.0 to 3.0 h) compared to the latter (median 4.3 h; 95% CI 3.0 to 5.5 h). The duration of labour stages 1 and 2 were similar in both groups. The time spent in the delivery ward was slightly reduced for women managed by amniotomy alone (median 5.0 h; 95% CI 4.5 to 6.0 h) compared with those managed by the combination of amniotomy and oxytocin infusion (median 6.0 h; 95% CI 5.0 to 6.5 h). Eighty-seven percent in group A and 32% in group B were given oxytocin, and the total oxytocin infusion time was nearly five times longer in group A. No other important effect on maternal or fetal outcomes was demonstrated.
                With regard to safety the results do not warrant recommending either type of labour induction. The minor differences observed between the induction groups justify an individual management policy, with attention paid to both the indication for induction of labour and the woman's choice.
These results are encouraging but are limited by the sparse data and unclear methodological robustness, therefore further evidence is required before amnioinfusion for PPROM can be recommended for routine clinical practice.