A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the use of conscious sedation in conjunction with paracervical block for reducing pain in termination of first trimester pregnancy by suction evacuation. Effects of prostaglandin treatment and paracervical blockade on postoperative pain in patients undergoing first trimester abortion in general anesthesia. Paracervical block with and without conscious sedation: a comparison of the pain levels during egg collection and the postoperative side effects. Patient-controlled versus nurse-administered sedation with propofol during colonoscopy. A prospective randomized trial. A randomized comparison of patient-controlled versus standard analgesic requirements in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Effect of the intensity of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation on the postoperative analgesic requirement. Coronary artery bypass grafting using two different anesthetic techniques: Part 2: Postoperative outcome. Sedation, topical pharyngeal anesthesia and cardiorespiratory safety during gastroscopy. [The effect of anesthesiologic technique on the mental state of elderly patients submitted for orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs]. Efficacy of patient-controlled versus conventional analgesia for postoperative pain. A prospective randomized trial comparing patient-controlled sedation using propofol and alfentanil and physician-administered sedation using diazepam and pethidine during transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval. Assessing clinical generalizability in sedation studies of upper GI endoscopy. The effects of three different analgesia techniques on long-term postthoracotomy pain. Unpreserved lidocaine to control discomfort during cataract surgery using topical anesthesia. Sedative music reduces anxiety and pain during chair rest after open-heart surgery. Heated and humidified insufflation during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: effect on temperature, postoperative pain, and recovery outcomes. Evidence-based postoperative pain management in nursing: is a randomized-controlled trial the most appropriate design? [Efficiency of patient-controlled analgesia versus conventional analgesia in patients after thoracotomy]. Effect of humidified and heated CO2 during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery on analgesic requirements and postoperative pain. [Clinical study of postoperative sedation in pediatric patients--effects of inhalation anesthetics and postoperative analgesics]. The role and comparison of two techniques of paracervical block for pain relief during suction evacuation for first-trimester pregnancy termination. Reduction of laparoscopic-induced hypothermia, postoperative pain and recovery room length of stay by pre-conditioning gas with the Insuflow device: a prospective randomized controlled multi-center study. The influence of postoperative telephone calls on pain perception: a study of 118 periodontal surgical procedures. Patient-controlled analgesia compared with nurse-controlled infusion analgesia after heart surgery. Evaluation of a single preoperative dose of pregabalin for attenuation of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patient-controlled analgesia vs. conventional intramuscular analgesia following colon surgery. Can visual distraction decrease the dose of patient-controlled sedation required during colonoscopy? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Acupressure for intrathecal narcotic-induced nausea and vomiting after caesarean section. A comparison of patient comfort during cataract surgery with topical anesthesia versus topical anesthesia and intracameral lidocaine. Oral analgesia vs intravenous conscious sedation during Essure Micro-Insert sterilization procedure: randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. The effect of two nursing interventions on the postoperative outcomes of gynecologic laparoscopic patients. Effects of patient-controlled analgesia on postoperative anxiety in elderly men. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of preoperative oral pregabalin for postoperative pain relief after minor gynecological surgery. Pain management in cardiac surgery patients: comparison between standard therapy and patient-controlled analgesia regimen. No effect of preoperative paracetamol and codeine suppositories for pain after termination of pregnancies in general anaesthesia. Multimodal analgesia before thoracic surgery does not reduce postoperative pain. Distraction with a hand-held video game reduces pediatric preoperative anxiety. Nurse-administered propofol-alfentanil sedation using a patient-controlled analgesia pump compared with opioid-benzodiazepine sedation for outpatient colonoscopy. [Chronic postoperative pain after general anesthesia with or without a single-dose preincisional paravertebral nerve block in radical breast cancer surgery].
This study evaluated the role of conscious sedation in pain relief during termination of first trimester pregnancy by suction evacuation (SE) under local anaesthesia.
                A hundred women undergoing SE before 12 weeks gestation were randomized by computer using the sealed envelope method to receive placebo (saline) or conscious sedation (2 mg midazolam and 25 microg fentanyl) i.v. 5 min before cervical dilatation. Paracervical block was given to all patients, 2 min later. Pain scores during and after SE, post-operative side-effects and satisfaction level were compared.
                No statistically significant differences in pain scores were found between the two groups. Post-operative side-effects such as dizziness (P = 0.015) and drowsiness (P < 0.001) were significantly more severe in the conscious sedation group. However, patients in the conscious sedation group reported better satisfaction levels than the control group (P = 0.003).
                The use of conscious sedation significantly improved patient satisfaction during termination of first trimester pregnancy by SE under local anaesthesia, despite a lack of improvement in pain relief and the presence of increased severe dizziness/drowsiness in the post-operative period. The postoperative analgesic efficacy of a paracervical blockade (PCB) as an adjunct to general anesthesia (GA) during outpatient abortion (dilatation and curettage) is unclear, and the present study was initiated to evaluate if PCB is of significant importance per- or postoperatively.
                Two hundred women (aged 18-49 years) were assigned to one of four groups; group 1 received vaginal prostaglandin (PG) (PGE1, gemeprost 1 mg) for softening of the cervix preoperatively and surgery was performed in GA, group 2 received preoperative PG and surgery was performed in GA + PCB; group 3 did not receive PG treatment and surgery was performed in GA and group 4 were subjected to GA + PCB without preoperative PG.
                Women receiving preoperative prostaglandin treatment (groups 1 and 2) reported significantly higher pain intensity already preoperatively, but also postoperatively as compared to patients not treated with PG. The patients subjected to prostaglandin treatment (groups 1 and 2) also had a significantly higher consumption of analgesics as compared to non-PG treated groups (3 and 4). The addition of PCB did not influence pre- and postoperative pain intensity significantly or consumption of analgesics. Patients receiving PG also reported significantly more nausea than the others although nausea was of low intensity. Patients receiving PG were, however, discharged earlier than the others from the hospital.
                Preoperative treatment of the cervix with prostaglandins was associated with significantly higher pain intensity both pre- and postoperatively, and increased need for analgesics postoperatively and more intense nausea. PCB given just before surgery did not result in significant postoperative analgesia. More efficient techniques for pain control should be developed for women subjected to first trimester abortion with preoperative PG treatment. To compare the pain levels during egg collection and the subsequent postoperative side effects in patients receiving a paracervical block (PCB) with and without conscious sedation.
                A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study.
                A tertiary assisted reproduction unit.
                150 patients undergoing egg collection.
                Randomized to receive PCB only (control group) and PCB in conjunction with conscious sedation (sedation group).
                Vaginal and abdominal pain levels; severity of postoperative side effects.
                The median pain levels during vaginal punctures were 12.0 (2.5th--97.5th centiles: 0--84.3) and 30.0 (2.5th--97.5th centiles: 0--100) in the sedation and placebo groups, respectively. The corresponding median abdominal pain levels were 16.5 (2.5th--97.5th centiles: 0--100) and 43.0 (2.5th--97.5th centiles: 0--100). The pain levels were significantly higher in the placebo group than the sedation group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the severity of nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and drowsiness.
                Patients who received only a PCB during the egg collection experienced 2.5 times higher levels of vaginal and abdominal pain as compared to those who received both PCB and conscious sedation. The use of PCB along is not recommended for all patients but it may be considered with selected patients after they have been given extensive counseling. Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) with propofol, is well tolerated and reduces recovery time and staff required during endoscopic interventions. "Who" administers the drug proves economically crucial. With the aim of maintaining safety, medical quality, and patient satisfaction, this study investigates PCS versus nurse-administered propofol sedation (NAPS) in a cohort of consecutive patients.
                One hundred and fourteen patients, aged 22-90 yr, undergoing only colonoscopy participated in this prospective randomized trial. Patients were randomly assigned to either PCS or NAPS. If patients declined randomization for different reasons of reluctance to PCS they were assigned to a standard nurse-sedated control group. All patients received pethidine presedation for analgesia. Visual analogue scales followed patient anxiety level, tolerability, pain, and satisfaction, and endoscopist's assessment of the procedure.
                Given the choice, 35% of the patients who were rather younger and more anxious declined randomization to PCS. The mean total dose of propofol needed in this group was higher, but the patients had a tendency to rate the global tolerance and the pain of the examination as less comfortable compared to the two randomized groups. Self-administration of propofol created a significantly different drug profile and higher medication costs. With regard to the safety parameters there was no difference between PCS and NAPS. In their global assessments, the patients and endoscopists tended to prefer NAPS.
                Individual patient characteristics and attitudes toward self-control are crucial for PCS. While being a viable option for patients who are able and willing to handle, this technique is not applicable in a considerable portion of everyday patients. In the current study, 55 patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to receive postoperative analgesia (morphine sulfate) administered through either patient-controlled intravenous (PCA) or standard intramuscular (IM) routes. There were no significant differences in length of hospitalization or required dose of morphine sulfate. Patients randomized to PCA reported significantly improved subjective relief from pain and a smaller percentage of time in pain during each of the first two postoperative days. In addition, they reported less sedation and less interference with both postoperative breathing and pulmonary recovery than patients who received IM morphine. Theoretically, PCA regimens can deliver narcotic analgesia at a higher and more varied rate (with fewer side effects) compared with standard IM narcotic delivery, which is more limited by considerations of clinical doses. In PCA dosing, patients should experience less time in pain and sedation. The results of the current study support this premise. Given the inherent side effects associated with both opioid and nonopioid analgesic drugs, a nonpharmacologic therapy that could decrease the need for analgesic medication would be valuable. We designed a sham-controlled study to assess the effect of the intensity of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation (TAES) on postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) requirement for hydromorphone (HM), the incidence of opioid-related side effects, and the recovery profile after lower abdominal surgery. One hundred one healthy consenting women undergoing lower abdominal procedures with a standardized general anesthetic technique were randomly assigned to one of four postoperative analgesic treatment regimens: Group I (n = 26) PCA only; Group II (n = 25), PCA + sham-TAES (no electrical stimulation); Group III (n = 25), PCA + low-TAES (4-5 mA of electrical stimulation); Group IV (n = 25), PCA + high-TAES (9-12 mA of electrical stimulation). The PCA device was programmed to deliver HM, 0.2-0.4 mg intravenously boluses "on demand," with a minimum lockout interval of 10 min. The TAES skin electrodes were placed at the Hegu acupoint on the nondominant hand and on both sides of the surgical incision. The TAES frequency was set in the dense-and-disperse mode, alternating at 2 Hz and 100 Hz every 3 s, with stimulation of the hand and incision alternated every 6 s. The patients in Groups II-IV were instructed to use TAES every 2 h for 30 min while awake. After discontinuation of PCA, oral pain medications were administered on demand. The postoperative PCA-HM requirement, pain scores, opioid-related side effects, and requirements for antiemetic and antipruritic medication were recorded. High-TAES decreased the HM requirement by 65% and reduced the duration of PCA therapy, as well as the incidence of nausea, dizziness, and pruritus. Low-TAES produced a 34% decrease in the HM requirement compared with only 23% in the "sham" TAES group. We conclude that high-TAES produced a significant decrease in the PCA opioid requirement and opioid-related side effects after low intraabdominal surgery. The aim of the present investigation was to study the effects of intraoperative and postoperative epidural pain management during and after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on the recovery time, postoperative pulmonary and cardiac parameters, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and sedation scores (SS) compared with patients anesthetized with general anesthesia (GA) whose postoperative pain was relieved with intermittent intravenous (IV) administration of nicomorphine. Fifty-four patients were studied postoperatively after uncomplicated CABG. In the thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) group (n = 27), intraoperative analgesia was based on high TEA in combination with GA. In the GA group (n = 27), IV anesthesia with high-dose sufentanil and midazolam was used. Postoperative pain management in the GA group consisted of intermittent IV administration of nicomorphine, 0.1 mg/kg every 6 hours, whereas for the TEA group continuous high TEA with 0.125% bupivacaine plus sufentanil, 1:1,000,000 (0.05 mL/cm body length/hr) was used. Patients in the TEA group awakened earlier (148 [34] minutes vs 335 [51] minutes), resumed spontaneous respiration earlier (326 [79] minutes vs 982 [52] minutes), and were extubated earlier (463 [79] minutes vs 1140 [58] minutes). VAS score, SS, and postoperative PaO2 were significantly (P less than or equal to 0.01) better in the TEA group. The incidence of tachycardia (15 vs 2 patients) and postoperative myocardial ischemia (12 vs 4 patients) was higher in the GA group. It is concluded that intraoperative and postoperative pain treatment with epidurally administered bupivacaine plus sufentanil improved the recovery time, as well as pulmonary and cardiac outcome after CABG, when compared with IV postoperative pain treatment after intraoperative GA with sufentanil and midazolam. In a prospective, double-blind study, we examined the effects of routine sedation and pharyngeal anesthesia on cardiorespiratory parameters during gastroscopy.
                Intravenous sedation and topical pharyngeal anesthesia are used to alleviate the discomfort during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cardiorespiratory changes during gastroscopy are common.
                Two hundred fifty two consecutive outpatients undergoing gastroscopy were assigned into 4 groups: (1) sedation with intravenous midazolam and placebo throat spray (midazolam group), (2) placebo sedation and pharyngeal anesthesia with lidocaine throat spray (lidocaine group), (3) placebo sedation and placebo throat spray (placebo group), and (4) no intravenous cannula nor throat spray (control group). Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), systolic and diastolic blood pressure and continuous electrocardiogram were recorded before, during, and after the endoscopic procedure.
                Gastroscopy increased heart rate in all study groups. Premedication with intravenous midazolam or lidocaine spray alleviated this rise (P<0.001, repeated measures analysis of variance) and decreased the incidence of tachycardia. Similarly, sedation with midazolam or topical pharyngeal anesthesia decreased the rise in systolic blood pressure (P<0.001). Midazolam produced lower SaO2 values during gastroscopy compared with lidocaine, placebo or control groups (P<0.001). However, episodes of desaturation (SaO2 </=92) were no more common in the midazolam group than in other groups.
                Premedication with midazolam alleviated the rise in heart rate and systolic blood pressure but induced a statistically significant decrease in arterial oxygen saturation. However, gastroscopy proved to be a safe procedure both with and without sedation. Influence of anesthetic technique on mental status in elderly patients submitted to major orthopedic procedures of lower limbs. Mental impairment is a common occurrence in elderly patients after major orthopedic surgery. Few studies have been published so far on this topic in spite of its relevant clinical and economic implications.
                1) To verify whether anesthesia has a causative role in postoperative mental confusion in elderly patients; 2) to compare the effects of General Anesthesia (GA) and Spinal Anesthesia (SA) on mental status.
                Controlled, comparative study.
                Sixty patients aged > or = 70, ASA I-II, submitted to femoral neck repair.
                Anesthesia Dept. and Orthopedic Dept. of a District Hospital in Italy.
                The day before surgery the mental status of elected patients was evaluated employing a modified Organic Brain Syndrome (OBS) scale (Gustafsson). The better the mental status, the lesser the OBS score. It was possible therefore to distinguish "oriented" from "confuse" patients (38 vs 22) if they scored < or = 6 or > 6 respectively. Patients from each group were than randomly assigned to receive either GA or selective SA. Neither group was premedicated. GA was induced with propofol 1 mg/kg and maintained with O2/N2O 40/60% and isoflurane; atracurium was employed to facilitate mioresolution. Spinal anesthesia was performed with hyperbaric 1% bupivacaine. All patients were monitored in the Recovery Room (RR) for at least one hour. Occurrence of hypotension and/or hypoxia in the Operating Room (OR) or the RR was immediately treated. Mental status was reassessed on the 1st and 2nd postoperative day and results were compared with the corresponding preoperative OBS scores both in GA patients and in SA patients.
                No statistically significant differences were found between pre- and postoperative OBS scores in both GA and SA group, whether "oriented" or "confuse".
                Mental status of elderly patients submitted to femoral neck repair doesn't seem to be influenced by the anesthetic technique chosen, independent of preoperative psychic conditions. Patient-controlled i.v. administration and intramuscular administration of morphine sulfate were compared in a crossover study to determine their relative effectiveness in relieving postoperative pain. Twenty adult patients scheduled for abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to one of two groups; one group received i.v. morphine sulfate for 24 hours using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device, after which they were given morphine sulfate i.m. for 24 hours. The treatment order was reversed for the other group. Amount of narcotic administered, respiratory rate, and levels of discomfort, activity, and sedation were assessed by the nursing staff every two hours. At the end of each 24-hour treatment phase, patients ranked their level of pain, amount of pain relief, level of sedation, ability to sleep, and ability to perform pulmonary toilet. Patients were also asked whether they preferred PCA or i.m. analgesic therapy for future surgery. Patients reported significantly less discomfort while using PCA than during i.m. morphine administration. No significant differences in amount of narcotic used, respiratory rate, nausea and vomiting, or levels of activity or sedation were noted for the two regimens. Patients' rankings of the two treatment modes did not differ significantly, but a majority of patients indicated a preference for future use of PCA. In these postoperative patients, administration of i.v. morphine sulfate by PCA was as safe as i.m. administration and possibly more effective in relieving pain. This open label study compared the effectiveness of patient-controlled sedation (PCS), with physician-administered sedation (PAS) during transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval (TUGOR).
                A total of 106 patients was randomized using a computer model to receive either PCS (n = 51) or PAS (n = 55). Intra-operative sedation and co-operation were measured on a 5-point scale while severity of pain, and doctor and patient satisfaction were assessed using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Number of oocytes retrieved and fertilization, cleavage and clinical pregnancy rates were also recorded.
                Levels of sedation and co-operation were similar between groups. The pain score was higher in the PCS group during (mean +/- SD, 53 +/- 23 versus 35 +/- 24; P < 0.01) and 2 h after the procedure (29 +/- 27 versus 17 +/- 22; P < 0.05). Doctors were less satisfied with PCS than PAS (62 +/- 25 versus 71 +/- 26; P < 0.05) while patients were highly satisfied with both methods (76 +/- 23 versus 74 +/- 21; not significant). There were no oversedation or peri-operative complications. Fertility outcomes were similar. Patients tended to prefer PCS when given the choice of sedation method.
                Although PCS provides less analgesia then PAS during TUGOR, it is safe, satisfactory and accepted by patients. Prior endoscopic studies evaluating conscious sedation have recruited only a small proportion of the patients actually approached. The generalizability of such results to an unselected adult ambulatory care population is thus questionable. The objectives of this study were to determine the characteristics of patients who refused inclusion in a randomized controlled trial of sedation and to compare these characteristics to those of patients who agreed to participate.
                Patients who refused participation in a randomized controlled trial of sedation completed standardized questionnaires addressing demographic data and possible confounding variables, and they also completed a validated anxiety questionnaire. Characteristics associated with refusal to participate in the randomized controlled trial were assessed by using uni- and multivariate analysis. Exploratory comparisons of outcomes between both groups included self-reported satisfaction with level of comfort and technical adequacy.
                Of 302 patients screened, 203 refused to participate in the randomized controlled trial. The most common reason for refusal was the request for no sedation (135/203). A total of 163 were enrolled in this synchronous study. Patients who refused to participate exhibited 3 distinguishing characteristics: prior treatment for an anxiety disorder (risk difference 9.4%: 95% CI[3%, 17%]), use of analgesic medication (risk difference 10.4%: 95% CI[2%, 19%]), and prior experience with EGD (risk difference 17.9: 95% CI[5%, 30%]). Only upper endoscopy experience was predictive of refusal to participate in the randomized controlled trial. No differences in outcomes existed between patients randomized to sedation and those refusing the randomized controlled trial who chose to receive sedative medication. Patients who refused participation in the randomized controlled trial and who underwent upper endoscopy without sedation were more satisfied than patients randomized to placebo (1.33 vs. 2.58; risk difference -1.25: 95% CI[-0.38, -2.1]). Moreover, the procedure in these patients was more adequate technically (4.86 vs. 4.18; risk difference 0.68: 95% CI[0.21, 1.13]).
                Characteristics of patients accepting and refusing randomization were highly similar, differing only with regard to upper endoscopy experience. An exploratory analysis of outcomes suggests that randomized controlled trial results may be biased in a direction that may underestimate the benefits of not administering sedative medication in a real-life setting. In this clinical, randomized, prospective study, we compared the effects of three different analgesia techniques (thoracic epidural analgesia [TEA] with and without preoperative initiation and IV patient-controlled analgesia [IV-PCA]) on postthoracotomy pain in 69 patients. In two groups, a thoracic epidural catheter was inserted preoperatively. Group Pre-TEA had bupivacaine and morphine solution preoperatively and intraoperatively. Postoperative analgesia was maintained with epidural PCA with a similar solution. Group Post-TEA, with no intraoperative medication, had the same postoperative analgesia as Group Pre-TEA plus the bolus dose. Group IV-PCA received only IV-PCA with morphine for postoperative analgesia. Pain was evaluated every 4 h during the first 48 h at rest, cough, and movement. Pre-TEA was associated with decreased pain compared with the other groups. Six months later, the patients were asked about their pain. The incidence and the intensity of pain were most frequent in Group IV-PCA (78%) and were the least in Group Pre-TEA (45%) (Group Pre-TEA versus Group IV-PCA, P = 0.0233; Group Pre-TEA versus Group IV-PCA, P = 0.014). Patients having pain on the second postoperative day had 83% chronic pain. TEA with preoperative initiation is a preferable method in preventing acute and long-term thoracotomy pain.
                Preoperatively initiated thoracic epidural analgesia has the most satisfying results in controlling postthoracotomy pain in the acute and long-term period, and it is associated with a decreased incidence (and intensity) of chronic pain compared with postoperative (epidural or IV) analgesia. Chronic pain has an incidence of 62%. To determine whether intraoperative unpreserved lidocaine further decrease discomfort or pain during sutureless small incision cataract surgery and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation under topical anesthesia.
                Outpatient ambulatory surgical center.
                In this prospective controlled study, comparable eligible patients were randomized to receive 0.1 cc unpreserved lidocaine 1% or 0.1 cc balanced salt solution (BSS) (control group) in double-masked fashion. Study drugs were injected intracamerally 1 minute before phacoemulsification. A predefined uniform pain/discomfort scale was used for assessment during phacoemulsification and IOL insertion. A secondary study using a 0.5 cc dose was also performed.
                Twenty-six percent in the control group and 9% in the lidocaine group had discomfort pain scores of 2 or more; 10% in the BSS group felt increased pressure or pain during phacoemulsification. In the lidocaine group, discomfort was felt mainly during IOL insertion, possibly as a result of wound manipulation. During phacoemulsification, no patient in the lidocaine group reported pain; 2% felt increased pressure during phacoemulsification. A dose increase to 0.5 cc reduced any intraocular sensation to 3% in the lidocaine group. No patient in either group had significant cell loss or adverse events.
                Intraoperative lidocaine is safe and effective in controlling intraoperative discomfort. Open-heart surgery patients report anxiety and pain with chair rest despite opioid analgesic use. The effectiveness of non-pharmacological complementary methods (sedative music and scheduled rest) in reducing anxiety and pain during chair rest was tested using a three-group pretest-posttest experimental design with 61 adult postoperative open-heart surgery patients. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 30 min of sedative music (N=19), scheduled rest (N=21), or treatment as usual (N=21) during chair rest. Anxiety, pain sensation, and pain distress were measured with visual analogue scales at chair rest initiation and 30 min later. Repeated measures MANOVA indicated significant group differences in anxiety, pain sensation, and pain distress from pretest to posttest, P<0.001. Univariate repeated measures ANOVA (P< or =0.001) and post hoc dependent t-tests indicated that in the sedative music and scheduled rest groups, anxiety, pain sensation, and pain distress all decreased significantly, P<0.001-0.015; while in the treatment as usual group, no significant differences occurred. Further, independent t-tests indicated significantly less posttest anxiety, pain sensation, and pain distress in the sedative music group than in the scheduled rest or treatment as usual groups (P<0.001-0.006). Thus, in this randomized control trial, sedative music was more effective than scheduled rest and treatment as usual in decreasing anxiety and pain in open-heart surgery patients during first time chair rest. Patients should be encouraged to use sedative music as an adjuvant to medication during chair rest. Controversy exists regarding the efficacy of heated and humidified intraperitoneal gases in maintaining core body temperature. We performed a sham-controlled study to test the hypothesis that active warming and humidification of the insufflation gas reduces intraoperative heat loss and improves recovery outcomes.
                Fifty morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures using a standardized anesthetic technique were randomly assigned to either a control (sham) group receiving room temperature insufflation gases with an inactive Insuflow (Lexion Medical, St. Paul, MN) device, or an active (Insuflow) group receiving warmed and humidified intraperitoneal gases. Esophageal and/or tympanic membrane temperature was measured perioperatively. Postoperative pain was assessed at 15 minute intervals using an 11-point verbal rating scale, with 0 = none to 10 = maximal. In addition, postoperative opioid requirements, incidence of nausea and vomiting, as well as the quality of recovery, were recorded.
                Use of the active Insuflow device was associated with significantly higher mean +/- standard deviation (SD) intraoperative core body temperatures (35.5 +/- 0.5 vs. 35.0 +/- 0.4 degrees C). Postoperative shivering (0 vs. 19%) and the requirement for morphine in the postanesthesia care unit (5 +/- 4 vs. 10 +/- 5 mg) were both significantly lower in the Insuflow vs. control groups. Patients in the Insuflow group also reported a higher quality of recovery 48 hours after surgery (15 vs. 13, P < 0.05).
                The Insuflow device modestly reduced shivering and heat loss, as well as the need for opioid analgesics in the early postoperative period. However, it failed to improve laparoscopic visualization due to fogging, and provided improvement in the quality of recovery only on postoperative day 2. There is an increasing drive to make nursing care evidence-based. High quality evidence from systematic reviews relevant to postoperative pain relief exists, yet pain after surgery remains poorly controlled for many patients. This study aimed to assess whether implementing evidence-based pain management improved postoperative pain outcomes. Pain on a 0-10 scale was the primary outcome and analgesic consumption a secondary outcome. A baseline audit was undertaken on four surgical wards to establish whether there was a need for the study. A randomized-controlled trial was then designed to assess the effects of implementing an evidence-based approach to postoperative pain management. The four wards were randomized to receive the intervention or act as a control. Outcomes were assessed 3 months after the intervention on both intervention and control wards. The intervention (implementation of an oral analgesic algorithm derived from systematic reviews) was then implemented on the control wards and outcomes reassessed after 3 months on the control wards. The intervention was designed using an evidence-based approach to effective implementation. Four interactive sessions covered: (1) detailed feedback of baseline data and discussion (utilizing audit and feedback), (2) why systematic reviews, analgesic league tables and choice of drugs to develop an analgesic algorithm (see Figure 1), (3) principles of evidence based health care (EBHC), including critical appraisal and (4) facilitation and change workshop. The findings revealed no significant differences in pain level or drug use between the intervention and control wards. However, the control wards also changed during the control period. Possible explanations for this are discussed. When looking at changes compared with baseline, both intervention and control wards increased their use of algorithm drugs and reduced use of non-algorithm drugs during the study. No effects were found on pain in the intervention wards. Pain ratings at rest since surgery, on movement since surgery and worst pain on movement were significantly reduced compared with baseline in the control wards. Although there are many pressures to utilize a randomized-controlled trial study design in the culture of evidence-based health care, there will be times, especially when implementing complex changes in practice that other types of design should be considered. The patients received thoracotomy usually suffered from significant severe pain postoperatively, which accompanied with impaired pulmonary function or increased incidences of atelectasis and pneumonia. So adequate analgesia for those patients is indicated. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficiency of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and determine whether it is better than conventional analgesia or not. Twenty-six patients, ASA physical status class I and II, were randomized into two groups: PCA and intramuscular (IM). The effect on pain relief was assessed by a visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) q 4 h postoperatively for two days. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and the questionnaire of nocturnal sleep disturbance by pain were evaluated preoperatively, the first, second postoperative mornings. As result of this study, the patients of PCA group get less pain than IM group after the first and second days of surgery. VAPS values are 3.7 +/- 1.1, 2.8 +/- 0.8 and 6.1 +/- 0.9, 5.3 +/- 1.1 respectively pertaining to PCA and IM groups (p less than 0.05). The patients of IM group get more disturbance of nocturnal sleep than PCA group at initial two nights of postoperation as well (p less than 0.05). It is manifest to look out the significant difference between these two groups in accordance with FVC ratio records of post-surgery vs presurgery at initial two days after surgery on the subject of respiratory function recovery. PCA group are 46.46 +/- 7.29%, 52.25 +/- 8.32% in a condition of more progress on lung function recovery than IM group of 38.13 +/- 10.25%, 42.15 +/- 7.82% (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To determine the effect of humidified and heated CO(2) for pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery on analgesic requirements, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction.
                Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study (Canadian Task Force classification I).
                University hospital.
                Ninety consecutive women scheduled for gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.
                Operative laparoscopic management of adnexa surgery or adhesiolysis.
                Thirty consecutive patients were randomized into each study group. Group I received humidified, heated gas; group II dry, heated gas; and group III (control group) standard dry, cold gas. No significant difference in intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirements or postoperative pain score between group I and group II was found. There was even a tendency (not significant) toward less pain and higher postoperative satisfaction in patients in the control group. Therefore, the evaluation was stopped after 53 patients.
                The use of humidified, heated gas did not reduce postoperative pain or intraoperative analgesic requirements and is thus not preferable to standard dry, cold gas in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. The effects of three different inhalation anesthetics (sevoflurane, isoflurane and halothane) delivered with oxygen and nitrous oxide during surgery and of postoperative analgesics on degree %% postoperative sedation immediately following removal of the tracheal tube, in the recovery room and thereafter in the surgical ward, were studied in 74 pediatric patients under 12 years of age. They underwent elective surgical procedures including repair of inguinal hernia, orchidopexy, tonsillectomy, repair of cleft lip and certain orthopedic procedures. The degree of postoperative sedation was assessed using a nine-point behavioral scale (sedation score) designed for the rating of postoperative pain in children. There were no significant differences in sedation score or frequency of use of postoperative analgesics at any time of assessment among the three inhalation anesthetics. Thirty-eight percent of the patients received analgesics such as diclofenac and acetaminophen suppositories, and intravenous pentazocine. There were no significant differences in sedation score between the group of patients who received analgesics and the group of those who did not, and many patients had satisfactory sedation scores in the surgical ward, suggesting that appropriate administration of postoperative analgesics is possible. This prospective study assessed the role and compared two techniques of paracervical block (PCB) for pain relief during suction evacuation for first-trimester termination of pregnancy following cervical priming with misoprostol. One-hundred and thirty-five women undergoing suction evacuation up to 12 weeks of gestation were randomized into three groups: (a) 5 mL of 1% lignocaine injected at the 4 and 8 o'clock positions of the vaginal vault; (b) 5 mL of 1% lignocaine injected at the 4 and 8 o'clock positions of the cervix and (c) no PCB. Pain scores during PCB, cervical dilatation and during and after suction evacuation were compared among the three groups. The sedation and satisfaction levels were also compared. There were no statistically significant differences in the pain levels during PCB, cervical dilatation and suction evacuation and in the satisfaction levels among the three groups. Patients with a lighter sedation level experienced more pain. In conclusion, PCB did not improve the pain levels during first-trimester suction termination of pregnancy after cervical priming with misoprostol and use of intravenous sedation, regardless of whether the local anaesthetic was injected into the cervix or the vaginal vault. To assess the efficacy and safety of Insuflow (Georgia BioMedical, Inc.) filter heater hydrator device in reducing the incidence, severity and extent of hypothermia, length of recovery room stay and postoperative pain at the time of laparoscopy.
                Prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled multi-center study. Patients underwent gynecologic procedures via laparoscopy; surgeons, anesthesiologists and recovery room personnel assessed the results.
                Seven North American institutions.
                Seventy-two women for safety evaluation and efficacy studies.
                Intraoperative pre-conditioning of laparoscopic gas with the Insuflow device (treatment) or standard raw gas (control) during laparoscopic surgery and postoperatively.
                Incidence, severity and extent of hypothermia, postoperative pain perception and length of recovery room stay.
                The Insuflow group had significantly less intraoperative hypothermia, reduced length of recovery room stay and reduced postoperative pain. Pre-conditioning of laparoscopic gas by filtering heating and hydrating was well tolerated with no adverse effects. The safety profile of the Insuflow pre-conditioned gas showed significant benefits compared to currently used raw gas.
                Pre-conditioning laparoscopic gas by filtering heating and hydrating with the Insuflow device was significantly more effective than the currently used standard raw gas and was safe in reducing or eliminating laparoscopic-induced hypothermia, shortening recovery room length of stay and reducing postoperative pain. This age-matched and sex-matched study examined the influence of postoperative telephone calls on pain perception and on the number of analgesics used for pain relief. Adult periodontitis subjects (n = 118) received periodontal surgery after examination and sanative therapy (scaling, root planing, and removal of local irritants). All subjects received similar care, postoperative instructions, and medication, except 59 subjects were phoned 24 hours postoperative (PC group), and 59 were not (NC group). Callers covered 10 points and were reassuring and positive about surgical outcomes. One week postoperative, subjects completed a questionnaire that rated pain intensity on a visual analogue scale and indicated the number of pills used and whether they had been called. Pain and analgesics used were significantly decreased in the PC group (P < 0.001) compared to the NC group. A significant positive correlation was found between pain and pills used in the groups combined (r = 0.79, P < 0.001 PC + NC), and in the groups separately (r = 0.50, P < 0.001 PC; r = 0.41, P < 0.01 NC). Postoperative communication between healthcare providers and patients significantly reduces pain perception and number of analgesics used for relief. A randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted on 66 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery to compare patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) to nurse-controlled analgesia (NCA) with continuous morphine infusion. Hourly assessment of pain (at rest and on movement) using a visual analogue scale (VAS), of respiratory rate, and level of sedation took place for the 24 h following extubation. The incidence of nausea was also recorded. Mean pain scores were calculated, and peak pain and sedation scores, together with lowest respiratory rates, were identified. Morphine consumption was measured at 24 h. No significant differences were found between the groups' scores for pain or sedation. The PCA group had significantly lower respiratory rates (P = 0.02) and a lower incidence of nausea (P = 0.008). The PCA group also consumed significantly more morphine (P = 0.0001). The study suggests a beneficial effect from PCA after cardiac surgery in reducing nausea, compared to NCA. It confirms nurse-controlled infusion analgesia as an effective form of pain relief in an intensive care and high-dependency setting. Postoperative pain is the dominating complaint and the primary reason for prolonged convalescence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We have evaluated the efficacy of a single preoperative dose of pregabalin for attenuating postoperative pain and fentanyl consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
                Sixty adults (16-60 yr), ASA physical status I and II, of either sex undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this prospective, randomized placebo controlled, double-blind study. Subjects were divided into two groups of 30 each to receive either a matching placebo or pregabalin 150 mg, administered orally 1 h before surgery. Postoperative pain (static and dynamic) was assessed by a 100 mm visual analogue scale, where 0, no pain; 100, worst imaginable pain. Subjects received patient-controlled i.v. fentanyl analgesia during the postoperative period. Results were analysed by Student's t-test, chi(2) test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Fisher's exact test.
                Postoperative pain (static and dynamic) and postoperative patient-controlled fentanyl consumption were reduced in the pregabalin group compared with the placebo group (P<0.05). Side-effects were similar in both groups.
                A single preoperative oral dose of pregabalin 150 mg is an effective method for reducing postoperative pain and fentanyl consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Though patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been in use for over a decade, it has been popularized only recently. Conventional techniques of intermittent intramuscular (IM) administration of analgesia have fallen short of meeting the needs of patients following major abdominal surgery. This has prompted a search for methods to improve postoperative pain management. Though PCA has been accepted in many hospitals, few studies comparing conventional IM administration of morphine with PCA have been performed. A prospective randomized study comparing IM- and PCA-administered morphine in 62 patients undergoing colon surgery was performed. A comparison of the efficacy of analgesia and extent of sedation using these approaches shows that PCA allows for analgesia with less sedation and less drug requirement than that of IM administration. No differences were noted in postoperative duration of ileus, duration of hospitalization, and total hospital costs. This study confirms the safety and efficacy of PCA, and should be considered the current optimal method of controlling pain following major colonic surgery. We previously demonstrated that audio distraction using relaxation music could lead to a decrease in the dose of sedative medication required and improve patient satisfaction during colonoscopy. This prospective randomized controlled trial was designed to test the hypotheses that visual distraction may also decrease the requirement for sedatives and that audio and visual distraction may have additive beneficial effects when used in combination.
                165 consecutive patients who underwent elective colonoscopy were randomly allocated into three groups to receive different modes of sedation: group 1 received visual distraction and patient-controlled sedation (PCS); group 2 received audiovisual distraction and PCS; group 3 received PCS alone. A mixture of propofol and alfentanil, delivered by a Graseby 3300 PCA pump, was used for PCS in these groups. Each bolus of PCS delivered 4.8 mg propofol and 12 micro g alfentanil. Measured outcomes included the dose of PCS used, complications, recovery time, pain score, satisfaction score, and willingness to use the same mode of sedation if the procedure were to be repeated.
                Eight patients were excluded after randomization. The mean+/-SD dose of propofol used in group 2 (0.81 mg/kg +/- 0.49) was significantly less than the dose used in group 1 (1.17 mg/kg +/- 0.81) and that used in group 3 (1.18 mg/kg +/- 0.60) ( P < 0.01, one-way analysis of variance). The mean +/- SD pain score was also lower in group 2 (5.1 +/- 2.5), compared with the pain scores in group 1 (6.2 +/- 2.2) and group 3 (7.0 +/- 2.4) ( P < 0.01, one-way analysis of variance). The mean +/- SD satisfaction score was higher in groups 1 (8.2 +/- 2.4)) and 2 (8.4 +/- 2.4), compared with the score in group 3 (6.1 +/- 2.9) ( P < 0.01, one-way analysis of variance). A majority of patients in groups 1 (73 %) and 2 (85 %) said that they would be willing to use the same mode of sedation again, compared with only 53 % in group 3 ( P < 0.01, chi-squared test).
                Visual distraction alone did not decrease the dose of sedative medication required for colonoscopy. When audio distraction was added, both the dose of sedative medication required and the pain score decreased significantly. Both visual and audiovisual distraction might improve patients' acceptance of colonoscopy. In this randomized double-blind trial we investigated the effect of acupressure on the incidence of nausea and vomiting after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with added intrathecal morphine. Parturients wore either acupressure or placebo wristbands during surgery and postoperatively for at least 10 h. There was no significant difference overall between the two groups in the incidence of intra- or postoperative nausea or vomiting/retching. Demand for antiemetic medication was also similar in the two groups. However, in the sub-group of parturients who gave a previous history of postoperative nausea or vomiting, there was a statistically significant reduction in both postoperative nausea and vomiting/retching in the acupressure group. Further investigations are needed to see whether acupressure may be an effective non-pharmacological, non-invasive treatment for a common problem in this sub-group of patients. To determine whether intraocular lidocaine increases patient comfort during cataract surgery while under topical anesthesia.
                Prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
                Both men and women between 45 and 85 years of age who were scheduled for elective cataract surgery while under topical anesthesia participated. Sixty-eight patients were randomized to each group.
                Patients were randomized to receive either topical anesthesia plus intracameral 1% preservative-free lidocaine or intracameral balanced salt solution.
                Patient assessment of pain during delivery of the anesthesia, surgery, and after surgery using a visual analog pain scale was measured. Patients also recorded the degree to which they were bothered by tissue manipulation and the microscope light. Surgeon assessments of operative conditions, patient cooperation, and intraoperative complications were recorded. The attending anesthesiologist recorded any required supplemental intravenous sedation and any increase in pulse or increase in blood pressure.
                There was no significant difference in patient-reported pain scores for delivery of anesthesia (P = 0.902), surgery (P = 0.170), or after surgery (P = 0.680). Patients in the lidocaine group reported being less bothered by tissue manipulation (P = 0.021). The surgeon assessment showed more patient cooperation in the lidocaine group (P = 0.043).
                Both topical anesthesia alone and topical anesthesia plus intracameral lidocaine provide good operative conditions for the surgeon and comfortable surgical circumstances for the patient. Injection of intraocular lidocaine increases patient cooperation and decreases the degree to which patients are bothered by tissue manipulation, two outcomes that justify its use. To compare the pain reported by patients during the Essure Micro-Insert sterilization procedure using either intravenous conscious sedation or oral analgesia.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).
                Tertiary care ambulatory women's clinic.
                Eighty women of reproductive age women requesting permanent sterilization.
                Hysteroscopic placement of the Essure Micro-Insert permanent birth control system.
                Patients undergoing placement of the Essure Micro-Insert system for permanent contraception were randomized to receive either intravenous conscious sedation, oral analgesia, or placebo. During the procedure, pain scores were recorded using a visual analog scale. Patients in the oral analgesia group reported slightly more pain during insertion of the hysteroscope and placement of the second micro-insert; the groups were otherwise equivalent. They were also equivalent when all visual analog scale scores were combined.
                Oral analgesia is an effective method of pain control during placement of the Essure Micro-Insert permanent birth control system.
                Copyright Â© 2011 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Anecdotal reports support research findings in documenting the high incidence of negative postoperative outcomes after gynecologic (GYN) laparoscopic surgery. Three outcome measures, postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and length of stay, have received considerable attention. Two nursing interventions frequently suggested for their positive effects are guided imagery and music therapy. An experimental pilot study was conducted to determine the effects of these nursing inventions on postoperative pain, PONV, and length of stay for GYN laparoscopic patients (n = 84). During the perioperative period, patients were randomly assigned to one of 3 interventions: guided imagery audiotapes (GI), music audiotapes (MU), or standard care (C), and outcome measures were evaluated. Results indicated that patients in both the guided imagery and music groups had significantly less pain on PACU discharge to home than the patients in the control group. These findings suggest that both guided imagery and music are effective strategies in improving pain, a difference that becomes apparent when the patient is ready to be discharged. It is possible that these interventions act as distractions in reducing the report of negative postoperative outcomes. To determine whether the use of patient-controlled analgesia vs intramuscular injections improves postoperative psychological parameters, particularly anxiety.
                Randomized, controlled trial of patient-controlled analgesia vs as-needed intramuscular morphine with pre- and postoperative assessments of pain, mental status, narcotic use, anxiety and mood states.
                General surgical wards and surgical intensive care unit at a Veterans Administration hospital.
                Eighty-three elderly, chronically ill males undergoing major elective surgery.
                Subjects randomized to receive postoperative patient-controlled analgesia vs as-needed intramuscular morphine. Pre- and postoperative assessments of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, McGill-Dartmouth Part IV and Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire. Pain (using linear analog scale), sedation score and narcotic use assessed every 4 hours for 72 hours.
                No differences were found in state anxiety or self-perceived mood states. Postoperative state anxiety was found to relate most closely to preoperative anxiety and postoperative complications, rather than method of analgesia or severity of pain. However, patient-controlled analgesia subjects had significantly improved analgesia and increased satisfaction.
                The use of patient-controlled analgesia does not significantly alter the measured psychological parameters, compared with intramuscular injections. Improved analgesia is the result of pharmacologic effects, independent of psychological factors. Although pregabalin shows efficacy against neuropathic pain, very limited evidence supports postoperative analgesic efficacy. Our study objective was to investigate analgesic efficacy in an ambulatory day surgical population experiencing acute visceral pain. The null hypothesis was that there was no significant difference in pain relief between pregabalin and placebo.
                A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial was performed in 90 women having minor gynecological surgery involving the uterus. Patients received either oral pregabalin 100 mg (Group PG) or placebo (Group C) approximately 1 h before surgery. The primary outcome was pain score in the recovery unit and patients were followed for 24 h.
                There was no significant difference between groups for pain experienced in the recovery room (median, interquartile range 16, 0-36 vs 10, 6.5-36 for Groups PG and C, respectively, P = 0.80) or thereafter; nor for recovery room fentanyl requirement (42% Group PG versus 27% Group C, P = 0.12) or the quality of recovery at 24 h postoperatively (median, interquartile range score 17, 17-18 Group PG versus 18, 16.5-18 Group C, P = 0.75). The incidence of posthospital discharge light-headedness, visual disturbance, and difficulty with walking was significantly higher in the pregabalin group.
                A single preoperative dose of 100 mg pregabalin does not reduce acute pain or improve recovery after minor surgery involving only the uterus. To compare standard nurse-based pain therapy with a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) regimen.
                Prospective, randomized study.
                Single-institutional, clinical investigation in an urban, university-affiliated hospital.
                Sixty patients undergoing elective first-time cardiac surgery were included.
                In 30 patients, a standard analgesic regimen was used, and in 30 patients, a PCA regimen was used. The perioperative and postoperative management was similar for all patients.
                Degree of sedation, satisfaction, and pain (by visual analog scale [VAS]) was assessed within the first 3 postoperative days. Vital capacity (VC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were measured using a portable spirometry system. Cortisol and troponin T (TnT) plasma levels were also measured. The expectation of pain was similar in both groups, and the postoperative pain score was significantly lower in the PCA than in the standard group throughout the study period. Significantly more piritramid was used in the PCA (total, 75.6 +/- 33.4 mg) than in the standard group (total, 20.1 +/- 31.9 mg). VC and FEV1 were significantly lower in the standard group compared with the PCA patients. Cortisol and TnT plasma levels were similar in both groups. Frequency of side effects were similar for both groups.
                Because of the beneficial effects with regard to degree of pain and satisfaction, pain management using PCA systems can be recommended for cardiac surgery patients. It appears to be superior to standard nurse-based pain therapy. Outpatient surgery demands rapid recovery and satisfied patients. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether rectal premedication with paracetamol and codeine would reduce the need of rescue analgesics, reduce the postoperative pain experience and result in faster eligibility for discharge. Ninety pregnant patients scheduled for day-case surgery with evacuation of the uterine cavity were randomly assigned into two groups. The paracetamol and codeine group was given a suppository with 60 mg of codeine and 800 mg of paracetamol together with standard premedication of intramuscular midazolam 0.08 mg/kg. The placebo group was given a placebo suppository and midazolam. All patients underwent the surgical procedure under general anaesthesia with alfentanil 15 microg/kg and propofol 1.5-2 mg/kg. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the postoperative pain experience as judged by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-scale), verbal scale or the need for rescue analgesic medication with ketobemidone. Most of the patients experienced little postoperative pain with more than 70% scoring less than 20 mm on a VAS-scale from 0-100 mm at any time during the postoperative period. The paracetamol and codeine patients were significantly more sleepy at 30 min postoperatively. There were no differences between the groups in postoperative nausea or vomiting and no difference in discharge eligibility. The use of pre-operative suppository with paracetamol 800 mg and codeine 60 mg is unnecessary in this group of patients.
                Copyright 2000 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Several reports have suggested that preoperative nociceptive block may reduce postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, or both, beyond the anticipated duration of action of the analgesic agents. We have investigated, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, pre-emptive analgesia and the respiratory effects of preoperative administration of a multimodal antinociceptive regimen. Thirty patients undergoing thoracotomy were allocated randomly to two groups. Before surgery, the treatment group (n = 15) received morphine 0.15 mg kg-1 i.m. with perphenazine 0.03 mg kg-1 i.m. and a rectal suppository of indomethacin 100 mg, while the placebo group (n = 15) received midazolam 0.05 mg kg-1 i.m. and a placebo rectal suppository. After induction of anaesthesia, the treatment group received intercostal nerve block with 0.5% bupivacaine and adrenaline 1:200,000 (3 ml) in the interspace of the incision and in the two spaces above and two spaces below. The placebo group received identical injections but with normal saline only. The treatment group consumed significantly less morphine by patient-controlled analgesia in the first 6 h after operation, but the total dose of morphine consumed on days 2 and 3 after surgery was significantly greater in the treatment group. There were no differences between the groups in postoperative VAS scores (at rest or after movement), PaCO2 values or postoperative spirometry. However, pain thresholds to pressure applied at the side of the chest contralateral to the site of incision decreased significantly from preoperative values on days 1 and 2 after surgery in both groups. The results of this study do not support the preoperative use of this combined regimen for post-thoracotomy pain. Video games have received widespread application in health care for distraction and behavior modification therapy. Studies on the effect of cognitive distraction during the preoperative period are lacking. We evaluated the efficacy of an interactive distraction, a hand-held video game (VG) in reducing preoperative anxiety in children.
                In a randomized, prospective study of 112 children aged 4-12 years undergoing outpatient surgery, anxiety was assessed after admission and again at mask induction of anesthesia, using the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS). Postoperative behavior changes were assessed with the Posthospital Behavior Questionnaire (PHBQ). Patients were randomly assigned to three groups: parent presence (PP), PP+a hand-held VG, and PP+0.5 mg.kg-1 oral midazolam (M) given>20 min prior to entering the operating room.
                There was a statistically significant increase in anxiety (P<0.01) in groups M and PP at induction of anesthesia compared with baseline, but not in VG group. VG patients demonstrated a decrease in anxiety from baseline (median change in mYPAS -3), the difference compared with PP (+11.8) was significant (P=0.04). The change in anxiety in the M group (+7.3) was not statistically different from other groups. Sixty-three percent of patients in VG group had no change or decrease in anxiety after treatment, compared with 26% in M group and 28% in PP group (P=0.01). There was no difference in anxiety changes between female and male patients.
                A hand-held VG can be offered to most children as a low cost, easy to implement, portable, and effective method to reduce anxiety in the preoperative area and during induction of anesthesia. Distraction in a pleasurable and familiar activity provides anxiety relief, probably through cognitive and motor absorption. Nurse-administered propofol sedation (NAPS) and patient-controlled sedation using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps are gaining increasing popularity for gastrointestinal endoscopy. We compared the safety and efficacy of NAPS using PCA pumps with diazemuls-pethidine sedation (DPS) for outpatient colonoscopy.
                In a prospective randomized controlled trial patients underwent outpatient colonoscopy with sedation by either NAPS or DPS. For NAPS, following intravenous loading of 0.8 mg/kg propofol, mixtures of 14.3 mg propofol and 35 microgram alfentanil were titrated by nurses using a PCA pump. For DPS, 0.1 mg/kg diazemuls and 0.5 mg/kg pethidine were given as intravenous bolus; further titration was administered as half doses at the endoscopist's discretion. Adequacy of sedation was measured by the Observer's Scale for Sedation and Alertness (OSSA) score (range 1-5).
                Between July 2005 and June 2006, 88 patients were randomly allocated to NAPS and 90 to DPS. The groups were comparable for baseline characteristics and procedure time. With NAPS, levels of sedation both during colonoscopic intubation and at reaching the cecum were significantly deeper than with DPS (OSSA 3 vs. 5, P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in cardiopulmonary complication rates, pain scores, satisfaction scores, and patients' willingness to repeat colonoscopy with the same sedation. Drugs cost for NAPS was higher than for DPS (Hong Kong dollars [HKD] 98.34 vs. 5.01).
                Despite higher costs, nurse-administered propofol-alfentanil sedation using a PCA pump can provide deeper conscious sedation, comparable satisfaction, and similar complication risks compared with conventional opioid-benzodiazepine sedation. Over 50% of patients still experience pain a year after mastectomy with or without lymphadenectomy. We aimed to determine the association between anesthetic technique, acute postoperative pain intensity, and the development of chronic postoperative pain. Patients and
                Forty patients were randomly assigned to receive general anesthesia with or without a paravertebral nerve block for modified radical mastectomy. Postoperative pain was assessed on a visual analog scale at 60 minutes and 24 hours; the patients were also asked to respond to a telephone questionnaire on chronic pain 4 to 5 months later.
                No significant differences in acute pain were observed. Twenty-nine responded to the telephone questionnaire. Only 1 patient in the paravertebral block group reported chronic neuropathic pain and none had phantom breast pain. Only 1 patient (6.7%) in the paravertebral block group reported chronic neuropathic pain and none had phantom breast pain. In the group that received general anesthesia alone, 1 patient reported phantom breast pain and 6 patients had neuropathic pain, associated with phantom breast pain in 2 cases (incidence of chronic pain 50%; P = .01, Fischer exact test; relative risk, 7.5, 95% confidence interval, 1.0-53.5). The incidences of myofascial pain (neck muscle tightness) were similar in the 2 groups.
                Four to 5 months after mastectomy, fewer cases of chronic pain developed in the group operated under general anesthesia with a preincisional paravertebral block than in the group that received only general anesthesia, with postoperative morphine chloride for analgesia.
Conscious sedation, GA and some non-pharmacological interventions decreased procedural and postoperative pain, while being safe and satisfactory to patients. Data on the widely used PCB is inadequate to support its use, and it needs to be further studied to determine any benefit.