Patient-controlled analgesia: a comparison with nurse-controlled intravenous opioid infusions. Intramuscular opioids for maternal pain relief in labour: a randomised controlled trial comparing pethidine with diamorphine. Intraoperative intravenous ketamine in combination with epidural analgesia: postoperative analgesia after renal surgery. A comparison of intramuscular ketorolac and pethidine in the alleviation of renal colic. A double-blind single dose comparison of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine and pethidine in the treatment of renal colic. Forced versus minimal intravenous hydration in the management of acute renal colic: a randomized trial. Epidural hydromorphone for postcesarean analgesia. Comparison of intravenous ketorolac, meperidine, and both (balanced analgesia) for renal colic. Patient-controlled versus staff-controlled analgesia with pethidine after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Comparative study of the efficacy of dipyrone, diclofenac sodium and pethidine in acute renal colic. Collaborative Group of the Spanish Society of Clinical Pharmacology. A multi-centre comparative study of diclofenac sodium and a dipyrone/spasmolytic combination, and a single-centre comparative study of diclofenac sodium and pethidine in renal colic patients in India. [Pethidine or nalbuphine for obstetric analgesia?]. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in treatment of postoperative pain after cardiac surgery. Comparative study of the efficacy of lysine acetylsalicylate, indomethacin and pethidine in acute renal colic. Patient-controlled analgesia for mucositis pain in children: a three-period crossover study comparing morphine and hydromorphone. [Does the preoperative administration of ketorolac improve postoperative analgesia]. Rectally administered diclofenac (Voltaren) reduces vomiting compared with opioid (morphine) after strabismus surgery in children. Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of preemptively used epidural ketamine and neostigmine.
Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous pethidine was compared with nurse-controlled pethidine infusions for pain relief in 200 patients after major abdominal or thoracic surgery. Pain, level of sedation, nausea and presence of other adverse effects, in addition to cumulative pethidine requirement, were measured for the first 24 hours after surgery. Both groups were similar for age, weight and type of surgery. There was no significant difference between the quality of analgesia achieved in both groups. The frequency and severity of adverse effects was also similar. The cumulative pethidine dose administered to both groups was identical. It is concluded that nurse-controlled opioid infusions are as effective as PCA and may be used as an alternative to PCA where this is either unavailable or unsuitable. To compare the pain relief and side effects of intramuscular pethidine with intramuscular diamorphine in labour.
                Double-blind randomised controlled trial.
                The labour ward in a UK teaching hospital.
                Sixty-nine nulliparous women and 64 multiparous women in labour who requested narcotic analgesia and remained undelivered one hour after trial entry.
                Nulliparous women were randomised to receive either 150 mg intramuscular pethidine or 7.5 mg intramuscular diamorphine. Multiparous women were randomised to receive either 100 mg intramuscular pethidine or 5 mg intramuscular diamorphine. All participants received the anti-emetic prochloroperazine at the same time as the trial drugs.
                Maternal analgesia assessed by a visual analogue score and verbal scales of pain intensity and pain relief, maternal sedation and vomiting, neonatal outcome assessed by Apgar scores and the need for resuscitation.
                More women allocated to receiving pethidine than to diamorphine reported slight or no pain relief at 60 minutes after administration of these drugs (P = 0.03). This trend was repeated in most of the other measures for maternal analgesia. There was no difference in maternal sedation, but the incidence of vomiting within 60 minutes was lower for women who received diamorphine (P = 0.02). Pethidine was associated with lower Apgar scores at 1 minute (P < 0.05).
                Intramuscular diamorphine in labour appears to have some benefits, compared with intramuscular pethidine, but the trial was small and further research, particularly into alternative opioids and long term effects on the infants is still needed. We designed this double-blinded, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the effect of small-dose ketamine IV in combination with epidural morphine and bupivacaine on postoperative pain after renal surgery. An epidural catheter was inserted, and the administration of morphine and bupivacaine was started before surgery. Forty patients were assigned to one of two groups (ketamine or control). The ketamine group was administered a ketamine bolus and infusion during surgery. The median visual analog pain scale (VAS) scores at rest were significantly lower in the ketamine group during the first 6 h (P < 0.01). VAS pain scores on coughing were also significantly lower in the ketamine group (P < 0.01). Cumulative postoperative total analgesic consumption was less in the ketamine group on Days 1 and 2 (P < 0.001). The first analgesic demand time was shorter in the control group (9.2 +/- 11.5 min) than in the ketamine group (22.3 +/- 17.1 min) (P < 0.0001). The incidence of nausea and pruritus was more frequent in the control group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, postoperative analgesia was more effective when spinal cord and brain sensitization were blocked by a combination of epidural morphine/bupivacaine and IV ketamine.
                Renal nociception conducted multisegmentally by both the spinal nerves (T10 to L1) and the vagus nerve cannot be blocked by epidural analgesia alone. We demonstrated that IV ketamine had an improved analgesic or opioid-sparing effect when it was combined with epidural bupivacaine and morphine after renal surgery. To compare the analgesic efficacy of a single 30 mg intramuscular dose of ketorolac with that of intramuscular pethidine 100 mg, in a double-blind, parallel-group investigation of patients presenting with pain suggestive of renal colic.
                Seventy-six patients (17 women, 15 men; mean age 45.2 years, range 20-80) were allocated by means of a pre-determined randomization schedule to receive ketorolac and 78 patients (20 women, 58 men; mean age 42.1, years range 18-70) to receive pethidine. Data from eight patients in the ketorolac group and six in the pethidine group were excluded from the efficacy analyses because of protocol violations. The severity of each patient's pain was assessed on a four-point verbal rating scale (VRS) and a 10 cm visual analogue scale at pre-dose and at 15 min intervals for the first hour post dosing. The time to first administration of rescue analgesic, up to 24 h following dosing with the study medication, was recorded. Adverse events were elicited by general questioning.
                Eighty-eight per cent of patients in each treatment group had improved according to the VRS of pain severity 1 h after dosing; the summed pain intensity differences up to 1 h were statistically significantly different in favour of ketorolac (P < 0.05). Fifty-six per cent of patients who were receiving ketorolac required rescue analgesia during the study period compared with 74% receiving pethidine. The incidences of adverse events were lower in the ketorolac group (28%) than the pethidine group (51%).
                Ketorolac can be considered a viable alternative to pethidine for the treatment of renal colic. The efficacy of a single dose of intramuscular ketorolac 10 mg or 90 mg was compared with pethidine 100 mg in a randomized double-blind study in 121 patients reporting at least moderate pain due to renal colic. Pain was assessed before drug administration, and then at 1 hour and 12 hours after the dose. Sedation was also assessed at these times, and additionally at the 12 hour assessment the time of the next analgesic dose was recorded. At 1 hour after dosing, pain scores had decreased in all groups; the largest decrease was seen in the ketorolac 90 mg group. The difference in the decrease was significant between the two ketorolac groups, but the differences between ketorolac and pethidine were not significant. Fewer patients in the ketorolac 90 mg group (17%) required a further dose of analgesic within 10 hours than in either the ketorolac 10 mg group (39%) or the pethidine 100 mg group (47%). The difference between ketorolac 90 mg and pethidine 100 mg was statistically significant. At both assessment times the proportion of patients with no sedation was higher in the two ketorolac groups than in the pethidine group. The overall incidence of adverse events was low with all drugs, notably so for the occurrence of vomiting after ketorolac. The results of the study show that intramuscular ketorolac is efficacious in the treatment of renal colic. The management of acute renal colic is a problem commonly encountered by both urologists and emergency medicine physicians. The classic approach to managing uncomplicated acute renal colic involves hydration, along with imaging and pain control. Previous studies have suggested that hydration has a significant impact on patient comfort, as well as spontaneous stone passage. This study evaluated the effects of maintenance v forced hydration and its effect on the pain experienced from renal colic.
                Forty male and 18 female patients with a mean age of 41 years suspected to have acute renal colic were identified in the emergency department. After screening and informed consent, the patients were enrolled in the study, and 43 patients were eventually available for analysis. Patients received intravenous (IV) analgesia, imaging with a noncontrast CT scan of abdomen and pelvis, and assignment to either forced IV hydration with 2 L of normal saline over 2 hours (N = 20) or minimal IV hydration at 20 mL of normal saline per hour (N = 23). A visual analog pain scale was completed hourly for a total of 4 hours. Demographic information, laboratory and imaging results, narcotic use in morphine equivalents (ME), and pain scores were recorded and compared. Spontaneous stone passage rates were also calculated by careful patient follow-up. Results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
                Stone size was equivalent in the two treatment groups (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the narcotic requirement in ME (p = 0.644) between the two groups. Similarly, there was no difference in hourly pain score or stone-passage rates between the groups (p > 0.05).
                Treatment of uncomplicated renal colic has traditionally included vigorous intravenous hydration, as well as medications for the control of pain and nausea. Our data suggest that maintenance intravenous fluids are as efficacious as forced hydration with regard to patient pain perception and narcotic use. Moreover, it appears the state of hydration has little impact on stone passage. The efficacy of epidurally administered hydromorphone for postcesarean analgesia was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients in group H (N = 26) received 1.0 mg of hydromorphone in preservative-free saline (total volume = 10 mL), administered epidurally. Patients in group B (N = 26) received 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, administered epidurally. Both groups subsequently received intramuscular injections of hydromorphone as needed. There were significant differences between the two groups in pain score, patient assessment of analgesia quality, time to first analgesic intervention, and total dosage of hydromorphone during the first 24 hours. Nausea/vomiting and pruritus occurred more frequently in group H. No patient had a respiratory rate less than or equal to 10. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in mean times to first ambulation, first void, first passage of flatus, or hospital discharge. To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of IV ketorolac, the only nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug indicated for parenteral use in acute pain in the United States, with IV meperidine and with a combination of the two agents in renal colic.
                We carried out a double-blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial in the emergency departments of four urban tertiary care teaching hospitals. Our study subjects were 154 patients with suspected renal colic. Each subject received an initial IV dose of ketorolac 60 mg, meperidine 50 mg, or both supplemented as needed beyond 30 minutes with additional doses of meperidine.
                The main outcome measures were changes in pain-intensity and pain-relief scores, amount of supplemental meperidine required, end-of-study drug tolerability, and adverse events. Analyses of 106 subjects with confirmed renal colic indicated that ketorolac and the combination were significantly better than meperidine alone by all efficacy measures, including pain relief and time elapsed before the need for supplemental meperidine. By 30 minutes, 75% of the ketorolac group and 74% of the combination group had a 50% reduction in pain scores, compared with 23% of the meperidine group (P < .001). The ketorolac and combination groups did not differ significantly in any of the efficacy measures.
                IV ketorolac, alone or in combination with meperidine, was superior to IV meperidine alone in moderate and severe renal colic. Because many subjects in all three treatment groups received supplemental meperidine and because response to ketorolac alone cannot be predicted, clinicians may choose to initiate treatment with a ketorolac-meperidine combination. Patients treated by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (aBMT) suffer prolonged oropharyngeal mucositis pain. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with an established regimen of staff-controlled analgesia using pethidine (meperidine). Twenty patients undergoing aBMT for haematologic neoplasias or malignant lymphomas randomly received pethidine intravenously either continuously plus supplemental bolus doses on request through the transplant unit staff or by PCA. Pain intensity was assessed by patient self report using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and daily pethidine intake was documented. In addition, the pethidine consumption of 20 aBMT-patients receiving staff-controlled analgesia prior to initiation of the study, but not reporting pain, was compared retrospectively with that of patients receiving the same analgesia regimen under study conditions. PCA significantly diminished both pethidine consumption and pain intensity compared with staff-controlled analgesia. The maximum pethidine intake was 440.1 +/- 111.8 mg/24 h in the patient-controlled and 640.9 +/- 128.9 mg/24 h in the staff-controlled analgesia group (mean +/- 95% CI). Mean pain scores remained under 50% but reached 70% in the staff-controlled analgesia group. Pethidine dosage by staff-controlled analgesia increased under study conditions, suggesting that mere pain-assessment and a 'competing' analgesic method motivated the BMT-unit staff to administer higher pethidine doses. This observation is discussed as a possible Hawthorne effect. Previous studies using morphine demonstrated that PCA diminishes opioid requirement compared to continuous or staff-controlled application in bone marrow recipients. In contrast to these studies, PCA additionally improved pain relief in the present investigation. A randomized, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial was designed to compared the analgesic efficacy of i.m. dipyrone 1 and 2 g, i.m. diclofenac sodium and i.m. pethidine in acute renal colic. The study was carried out in 451 patients in 13 Spanish hospitals. Ureteric colic was diagnosed by the clinical features, urinalysis, or when the presence of a ureteric calculus was confirmed. The severity of pain was assessed by the physicians and by patients using visual analogue scales. The main parameter of drug efficacy was the need for rescue treatment-pethidine 100 mg i.m. 30 min after the experimental treatment. Rescue treatment was required in 93 patients: they represented 24.1% of the group given dipyrone 1 g; 22.3% of those on dipyrone 2 g; 16.4% of those given diclofenac sodium; and 19.5% of those on pethidine. The differences between the groups were not significant. In the remaining 358 patients, no difference between treatments was observed. The results suggest that in acute renal colic the use of dipyrone 2 g is unjustified as dipyrone 1 g is equally effective. Diclofenac sodium is a valid alternative, which shows similar analgesic efficacy. A single-blind, randomized clinical trial was carried out to compare the analgesic effectiveness in patients with renal colic of single intramuscular doses of diclofenac sodium (75 mg) versus a dipyrone (1 g)/spasmolytics combination, and diclofenac sodium (75 mg) versus pethidine (75 mg). The first study involved three centres, the second study one centre. In total, 107 patients were treated with diclofenac sodium, 85 with dipyrone/spasmolytics, and 25 with pethidine. Assessments were made during the first hour after drug administration of the degree of pain relief, the severity of pain using a visual analogue scale, and the duration of analgesia. A global assessment of treatment efficacy was made by the participating physicians at the end of the study period. Patients treated with diclofenac sodium showed an earlier onset of analgesia and a higher incidence of total pain relief compared to those treated with dipyrone/spasmolytics or pethidine. Although the mean duration of analgesia was only slightly greater in the diclofenac sodium group than in the dipyrone/spasmolytics group, a significantly longer effect was seen when diclofenac sodium was compared with pethidine (p less than 0.01). Pain severity assessments revealed that diclofenac sodium caused a significantly greater improvement in pain after 60 minutes compared to dipyrone/spasmolytics (p less than 0.05) and after 30 minutes compared to pethidine (p less than 0.05). Global efficacy assessments by the physician rated diclofenac sodium as significantly superior to dipyrone/spasmolytics (p less than 0.01) and pethidine (p less than 0.001). Moreover, diclofenac sodium was better tolerated than either of the comparative treatments. The results indicate that intramuscular diclofenac sodium is a useful alternative to the drugs commonly used in India in the treatment of renal colic. Because of the risk of ventilatory depression, agonistic and partially agonistic/antagonistic opiates are well suited for providing pain relief in obstetrics. We compared two groups of 20 women each with pregnancy on term who received equipotent doses of nalbuphin (0.1 mg/kg) and pethidin (0.8 mg/kg) intramuscularly. We found a significantly longer (6h) and better analgesic effect in the nalbuphin group but also a significantly more pronounced sedation. Other side effects were fewer in this last-named group. There were no differences in the behaviour of the babies between both groups. We consider that because of the "ceiling effect" of ventilatory depression, nalbuphin may allow better analgesia without the risk of ventilatory depression of both mother and newborn. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used as analgesic in postoperative pain to reduce opioid side effects, such as drowsiness and nausea. However, NSAIDs have not been used extensively in cardiac surgical patients due to the fear of untoward effects on gastric, renal, and coagulation parameters. This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of three NSAIDs for pain control in CABG patients.
                One hundred and twenty patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery were enrolled in randomized, double blind, controlled study. Standardized fast track cardiac anesthesia was used. One dose of drug (75 mg diclofenac, 100 mg ketoprofen, 100 mg indomethacin, or placebo) was given pr one hour before tracheal extubation and a second dose 12 hr later. Pain was treated with morphine iv and acetaminophen po. Visual analogue pain scores were recorded at baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hr after the first dose of drug.
                There were no differences among the groups in pain scores. Only patients who received diclofenac required less morphine than patients in the control group (P < 0.05). When the total amounts of pain medications were computed to morphine equivalents, only patients in the diclofenac group received less pain medications than the placebo group (P < 0.05). Proportion of patients with postoperative increase of creatinine level (20% and over) did not differ between placebo and drug groups.
                Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be used for analgesia management post CABG surgery in selected patients. Diclofenac appears to have the best analgesic effects by reducing the morphine and other analgesic requirement postoperatively. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of intravenous lysine acetylsalicylate 1.8 g, indomethacin 100 mg and pethidine 100 mg in acute renal colic in a randomized double-blind clinical trial. One hundred and fifty patients with acute renal colic were divided into three groups. The first group received lysine acetylsalicylate 1.8 g, the second group received indomethacin 100 mg and the third group received pethidine 100 mg. The degree of pain relief was recorded 5, 15, 30 and 60 min after intravenous administration of the drugs. There was no statistically significant difference between the degree of analgesia provided by pethidine and indomethacin. Lysine acetylsalicylate was less effective than indomethacin and pethidine. It is concluded that intravenous indomethacin is an effective alternative to intravenous pethidine in the treatment of acute renal colic. Intravenous lysine acetylsalicylate is inferior to intravenous indomethacin in treatment of acute renal colic. (1) To test the safety and efficacy of a clinical protocol for administering opioid by using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for the management of mucositis pain in children after bone marrow transplantation, (2) to compare the efficacy, side-effect profile, and potency ratio of morphine with those of hydromorphone by using PCA as the method of opioid administration, and (3) to obtain pharmacokinetic data on hydromorphone and morphine in this population of children.
                In this double-blind, three-period crossover study, patients were randomly assigned to receive either morphine (group 1) or hydromorphone (group 2) initially by means of PCA on days 1, 2, and 3 (period 1), to be followed on days 4, 5, and 6 (period 2) with the alternative opioid, followed by the opioid used at the commencement of the study on days 7, 8, and 9 (period 3). A clinical protocol for calculating the PCA commencement opioid dose and subsequent opioid-dose escalation was tested by measures of safety and efficacy. Measures of pain intensity and opioid side effects were made during the three periods. On the last study day (day 10), patients received a continuous infusion of opioid derived from the previous 24-hour PCA opioid requirement, and blood specimens were collected and stored for subsequent opioid analysis.
                Ten patients were enrolled in this study. Rapid escalation in opioid requirement commonly occurred at the commencement of PCA, followed by a variable plateau phase and then deescalation of opioid requirement after mucositis resolution. The measures demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the clinical protocol. In the concentrations used, there was no statistical difference between the mean daily pain, sedation, nausea and vomiting, and pruritus scores for both opioids (Friedman test). The analysis of variance of the log-total opioid doses per patient during periods 1, 2, and 3 indicated that patients used 27% more hydromorphone than expected from its presumed 7:1 ratio relative to morphine potency used in the PCA infusions. The mean plasma hydromorphone concentration was 4.7 ng/ml (range, 1.9 to 8.9 ng/ml), and the mean clearance was 51.7 ml/min per kilogram of body weight (range, 28.6 to 98.2 ml/min per kilogram). The mean plasma morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide, and morphine-3-glucuronide concentrations were 40.0 ng/ml (range, 15 to 62.5), 168.2 ng/ml (range, 54.4 to 231.9), and 391.0 ng/ml (range, 149.4 to 921.7), respectively. The mean morphine clearance was 34.3 ml/min per kilogram of body weight (range, 19.3 to 58.3). The mean molar ratios of morphine-6-glucuronide/morphine, morphine-3-glucoronide/morphine, and morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine-6-glucuronide were 2.48 (range, 1.4 to 3.3), 5.82 (range, 3.4 to 9.1), and 2.46 (range, 1.1 to 3.3), respectively.
                The safety and efficacy of a clinical protocol for the administration of opioids by means of PCA for mucositis pain after bone marrow transplantation was demonstrated. In this small study, hydromorphone was not superior to morphine in terms of analgesia or the side-effect profile: a larger study would be needed to show a difference. The clearances of hydromorphone and morphine in the children studied were generally greater than those previously recorded, but this finding may be related to disease or treatment variables. Apart from clearance, the morphine pharmacokinetics in the study population were similar to those previously recorded. Hydromorphone may be less potent in this population of children than indicated by adult equipotency tables. 1) To verify the usefulness of ketorolac administration (30 mg i.v.) before a surgical operation in terms of postoperative analgesia improvement; 2) To evaluate the impact of preoperative ketorolac administration on perioperative renal function and on intraoperative water balance; 3) to evaluate the presence of adverse effect due to preoperative NSAID use.
                Prospective randomized trial.
                University surgical department.
                Forty adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, randomized in 2 groups: in group 1 ketorolac (30 mg i.v.) was administered immediately after the induction and, for postoperative analgesia, ketorolac (30 mg i.v.) was administered beginning at the time of skin closure; in group 2 no ketorolac was administered before the operation and postoperative treatment was the same. Buprenorphine (0.3 mg i.m.) was administered in case of unsatisfactory analgesia. Fluids infused and diuresis were measured intraoperatively. One, 6 and 24 hours after the end of operation pain was evaluated using pain intensity score and VAS. The day after the operation serum creatinine and urea were measured.
                No statistically significant differences were found between groups regarding fluids infused, intraoperative diuresis, postoperative pain, adverse effects and number of bleeding episodes. More than 50% of patients, in either groups, required opioids administration.
                Ketorolac (30 mg i.v.) administration before a major abdominal operation does not improve postoperative analgesia nor determines significant alterations in renal function or increase in the frequency of abnormal bleedings. Opiate administration is necessary in more than 50% of the patients to achieve adequate analgesia. Nausea, vomiting and pain are common complications after strabismus surgery in children. Diclofenac, a non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug, is widely used to treat acute and chronic pain but there are few reports of its use given rectally in children undergoing strabismus surgery. This open randomised study was designed to investigate the analgesic and anti-emetic properties of rectally administered diclofenac compared with opioid (morphine) given i.v. in connection with strabismus surgery in children.
                After obtaining approval from the local ethics committee and written informed consent from the parents, 50 ASA class I-II children, 4-16 years of age, were randomised to receive either rectally administered diclofenac (Voltaren) 1 mg/kg or i.v. opioid (morphine) 0.05 mg/kg perioperatively. The children were consecutively operated upon from May 1999 to January 2001. Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl and propofol and maintained with propofol. Nitrous oxide was omitted. The postoperative pain was assessed after arrival at the post anaesthesia care unit (PACU) by using the validated Wong and Baker scale (FACES) Pain Rating Scale. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was assessed by measuring the frequency of vomiting and the degree of nausea.
                In the diclofenac group the incidence of PONV during the first 24 h was 12% (of which one child had severe vomiting). The incidence of PONV was much higher, 72% (P = 0.0000), in the morphine group, where 56% of the children also had severe vomiting. There were no difference in pain score between the two groups. Recovery time at the PACU was longer (P < 0.002) and the postoperative analgesic requirement higher in the morphine group (10 vs. 5 children). No children needed overnight admission to the hospital.
                Diclofenac given rectally is an effective analgesic for this kind of surgery and gives less postoperative nausea than i.v. morphine. No serious adverse events were observed. To compare the analgesic and side effects of preemptively used epidural ketamine +bupivacaine, neostigmine +bupivacaine, and bupivacaine alone on postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery.
                Randomized, controlled study.
                Inpatient anesthesia at the department of surgery of a metropolitan hospital.
                30 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients scheduled for abdominal surgery.
                Group K received 1 mL (50 mg) ketamine and 5 mL (25 mg) bupivacaine epidurally, Group N received 1 mL (0.5 mg) neostigmine and 5 mL (25 mg) bupivacaine epidurally, and Group B received 1 mL saline and 5 mL (25 mg) bupivacaine epidurally 30 minutes before operation. All patients underwent anesthesia induction with thiopental and vecuronium; anesthesia was maintained with isoflorane and vecuronium. For postoperative analgesia, all patients received epidural morphine for 48 hours postoperatively.
                Standard monitoring included: 48 hours of analgesic requirement, visual analog scale (VAS), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) in the 1st, 2nd, 6th, 12th, 24th, and 48th hours. Data were analyzed using Kruskall-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests, with a p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. No significant differences were observed regarding MAP and HR among the groups during the study period. In Group N, VAS was significantly lower than Group K and Group B. The total opioid consumption in Group N was significantly lower than in Groups K and B in the first 48 hours after the operation.
                Preemptive neostigmine can be a good choice for postoperative analgesia.
Both NSAIDs and opioids can provide effective analgesia in acute renal colic. Opioids are associated with a higher incidence of adverse events, particularly vomiting. Given the high rate of vomiting associated with the use of opioids, particularly pethidine, and the greater likelihood of requiring further analgesia, we recommend that if an opioid is to be used it should not be pethidine.