Fallopian tube sperm perfusion has no advantage over intra-uterine insemination when used in combination with ovarian stimulation for the treatment of unexplained infertility. A simple method for fallopian tube sperm perfusion using a blocking device in the treatment of unexplained infertility. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility: a randomized, prospective, cross-over trial. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) versus intra-uterine insemination (IUI) in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study. A randomized comparison of three insemination methods in an artificial insemination program using husbands' semen. Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Effect of sperm treatment with exogenous platelet-activating factor on the outcome of intrauterine insemination. Questioning the efficacy of Fallopian tube sperm perfusion.
In this prospective randomized study we treated 60 couples with unexplained infertility with a combination of ovarian stimulation and either intrauterine insemination (IUI) or fallopian sperm perfusion (FSP). In the IUI we used a volume of 0.5 ml of inseminate and in the FSP a volume of 4 ml. The demographic characteristics of the patients, the stimulation parameters and the sperm data were not statistically different between the two groups. The pregnancy rate per cycle was 16.2% in the IUI group and 14.5% in the FSP group and the pregnancy rate per woman was 40 and 36.7%, respectively (not statistically different). We conclude that IUI and FSP are equally effective in the treatment of couples with unexplained infertility. To evaluate the efficacy of fallopian sperm perfusion (FSP) using a new method similar to the FAST system in comparison with standard intrauterine insemination (IUI) in patients with unexplained infertility.
                Prospective, randomized, controlled study.
                Assisted conception service in a University Hospital.
                Women with unexplained infertility undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).
                After hCG administration, patients were randomized to either standard IUI or FSP. The women received the same treatment in the first and all subsequent cycles. A maximum of three cycles was performed. Intrauterine insemination was performed using a standard method, and fallopian sperm perfusion was performed using a commercial device for hysterosalpingography and tubal hydropertubation.
                Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates.
                A total of 132 cycles was completed: 66 IUI cycles and 66 FSP cycles. In the IUI group, there were 5 ongoing pregnancies, giving a pregnancy rate of 7.6 per cycle and 15.6% per patient; in the FSP group, 14 ongoing pregnancies occurred, giving a pregnancy rate of 21.2% per cycle and 42.4% per patient. The prevalence of multiple pregnancies, miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies was similar in the two insemination groups. Fallopian sperm perfusion was easy to perform, and no case of sperm reflux was observed. The procedure was well tolerated and no complications were observed. The costs were comparable with standard IUI.
                In the treatment of couples with unexplained infertility, the method for fallopian sperm perfusion described yields higher pregnancy rates than IUI, with no significant increase in costs or complications. However, these results need to be confirmed in larger studies before replacing IUI with FSP as standard practice. To compare the results of fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) versus standard intrauterine insemination (IUI) in patients with unexplained infertility undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).
                Randomized, prospective, cross-over study.
                Reproductive medicine unit of a university hospital.
                Fifty-six couples with unexplained infertility.
                COH was induced by recombinant FSH and monitored by serial transvaginal ultrasound. On the day of hCG administration during the first treatment cycle, patients were randomized to either IUI or FSP. Thereafter, in case no pregnancy was achieved, patients went on being treated with FSP and IUI in alternate cycles. A maximum of four treatment cycles per couple was performed. FSP was performed using a pediatric Foley's catheter inseminating 4 mL of sperm-enriched suspension; a Kremer-Delafontaine catheter delivering 0.5 mL of sperm suspension was used for IUI.
                Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle.
                One hundred twenty-seven cycles (58 FSP, 69 IUI) were performed. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 21.7% for IUI and 8.6% for FSP, respectively. No major adverse effects were recorded for either technique.
                After COH, FSP is less effective than IUI in couples with unexplained infertility. Prospective randomization of 60 couples with unexplained infertility was performed for treatment either with intrauterine insemination (IUI), using a volume of 0.5 ml of the inseminate, or Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP), using a volume of 4 ml of inseminate. The protocols for ovarian stimulation and induction of ovulation were the same in the two groups. The two groups were similar concerning age of the female at the start of treatment and the number of follicles > 15 mm diameter, the serum oestradiol concentrations and the endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. The mean (+/- SD) number of motile spermatozoa inseminated was significantly higher in the FSP group than in the IUI group (52 +/- 5 x 10(6) and 28 +/- 3 x 10(6) respectively). In the FSP group, 30 women were given a total of 52 treatment cycles; 14 clinical pregnancies occurred in this group, giving a pregnancy rate of 26.9% per cycle and 46.7% per woman. In the IUI group, 28 women were given a total of 51 treatment cycles; five clinical pregnancies occurred, giving a pregnancy rate of 9.8% per cycle and 17.9% per woman. The pregnancy rates per cycle and per woman in the FSP group were significantly higher than in the IUI group (P < 0.05, chi-square test). This study indicates that in the treatment of couples with unexplained infertility, Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) is more successful than intra-uterine insemination (IUI). To compare pregnancy rates with single intrauterine insemination (SIUI), double intrauterine insemination (DIUI) and fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP).
                Ninety patients undergoing a standard ovarian stimulation regimen were randomized to receive SIUI, DIUI or FSP. The end point was either pregnancy or completion of 3 treatment cycles without pregnancy.
                There were no differences in demographic data or ovarian responses. The total number of motile spermatozoa inseminated in the FSP group was significantly lower than in the SIUI group. No significant differences were found in pregnancy rate per cycle or patient, multiple pregnancy rate and outcome of pregnancy between the 3 groups.
                Similar pregnancy rates were achieved after SIUI, DIUI and FSP during stimulated cycles. Couples affected by idiopathic subfertility or male subfertility have an estimated spontaneous conception rate of about 2% per cycle. Although various infertility treatments are available, counselling of a couple in their choice of treatment is difficult because of the lack of consistent data from good-quality comparative studies. We compared the results of treatment with intrauterine insemination (IUI) with those of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF), and did a cost-effectiveness analysis.
                In a prospective, randomised, parallel trial, 258 couples with idiopathic subfertility or male subfertility were treated for a maximum of six cycles of either IUI in the spontaneous cycle (IUI alone), IUI after mild ovarian hyperstimulation, or IVF. The primary endpoint was a pregnancy resulting in at least one livebirth after treatment. Cost-effectiveness based on real costs was studied by Markov chain analysis.
                86 couples were assigned IUI alone, 85 IUI plus ovarian hyperstimulation, and 87 IVF. Ten couples dropped out before treatment began. Although the pregnancy rate per cycle was higher in the IVF group than in the IUI groups (12.2% vs 7.4% and 8.7%, respectively; p=0.09), the cumulative pregnancy rate for IVF was not significantly better than that for IUI. Couples in the IVF group were more likely than those in the IUI groups to give up treatment before their maximum of six attempts (37 [42%] drop-outs vs 13 [15%] and 14 [16%], respectively; p<0.01). The woman's age was the only factor that influenced a couple's chance of success. IUI was a more cost-effective treatment than IVF (costs per pregnancy resulting in at least one livebirth 8423-10661 Dutch guilders [US$4511-5710] for IUI vs 27409 Dutch guilders [US$14679] for IVF).
                Couples with idiopathic or male subfertility should be counselled that IUI offers the same likelihood of successful pregnancy as IVF, and is a more cost-effective approach. IUI in the spontaneous cycle carries fewer health risks than does IUI after mild hormonal stimulation and is therefore the first-choice treatment. To evaluate the effect of sperm treatment with exogenous platelet-activating factor (PAF) on IUI clinical pregnancy rate.
                Prospective randomized study.
                Assisted Reproduction Unit, 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Athens, Aretaieion Hospital, Athens, Greece.
                Fifty-two couples with unexplained infertility, candidates for IUI.
                Sperm treatment with an exogenous mixture of PAF (final concentration, 10(-7) mol/L) in sperm-washing medium, direct swim-up technique of sperm preparation, a maximum of six IUI cycles per couple with or without PAF treatment.
                Clinical pregnancy rate (pregnancies confirmed by ultrasonography per hundred cycles).
                The overall clinical pregnancy rate after a maximum of six IUI cycles was significantly higher when sperm was treated with PAF compared with the rate after the direct swim-up technique (23.07% vs. 7.92%).
                Treatment of sperm with exogenous PAF might improve the clinical outcome of IUI in cases of unexplained infertility. The aim of this work was to compare the efficiency of standard intrauterine insemination (IUI) and Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) in the treatment of infertility. Ninety-six consecutive patients with infertility in 100 cycles were included in the study. Those randomized to standard IUI included 48 patients in 50 cycles [25 clomiphene citrate only and 25 clomiphene citrate/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) cycles] (group I). Patients subjected to FSP included 48 patients in 50 cycles (18 clomiphene citrate only and 32 clomiphene citrate/HMG cycles) (group II). The overall pregnancy rate per cycle (16% versus 18%) was not significantly different in the two groups. The pregnancy rates were also similar in the two groups when compared for the cause of infertility: ovulatory disorder 16.7% versus 16%, tubal impairment 10% versus 9.1%, cervical hostility (no pregnancy occurred in this group) and unexplained infertility 21.4 % versus 25 %. The overall pregnancy rate (for the two groups) appeared higher when clomiphene citrate/HMG was used for ovulation induction (21.1%) than when clomiphene citrate only was used (11.6%).
For non-tubal subfertility, the results indicate no clear benefit for FSP over IUI. Therefore the advice offered to subfertile couples regarding the comparative use of FSP versus IUI in the treatment of non-tubal subfertility should reflect this.