Addition of anticholinergic solution prolongs bronchodilator effect of beta 2 agonists in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Randomised trial of an inhaled beta2 agonist, inhaled corticosteroid and their combination in the treatment of asthma. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a combination of ipratropium and albuterol is more effective than either agent alone. An 85-day multicenter trial. COMBIVENT Inhalation Aerosol Study Group. Extended therapy with ipratropium is associated with improved lung function in patients with COPD. A retrospective analysis of data from seven clinical trials. Anticholinergic and sympathomimetic combination therapy of asthma. Routine nebulized ipratropium and albuterol together are better than either alone in COPD. The COMBIVENT Inhalation Solution Study Group. Short-term regular beta 2-adrenergic agonists treatment is safe in mild asthmatics taking low doses of inhaled steroids. A randomised controlled comparison of tiotropium nd ipratropium in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Dutch Tiotropium Study Group. Decreased duration of emergency department treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations with the addition of ipratropium bromide to beta-agonist therapy.
A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial was designed to assess the safety, efficacy, and duration of the bronchodilation resulting from the addition of 500 micrograms of ipratropium bromide (Atrovent; Boehringer Ingelheim, CT) inhalation solution to standard small volume nebulizer treatments with 2.5 mg albuterol inhalation solution. A total of 195 patients (63% men, average age 64 years) with > 10 pack-year smoking histories and stable, moderate-to- severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] 1.02 liter, 38.8% predicted) from eight university-affiliated chest clinics in seven U.S. cities were enrolled into the study. Asthma, rhinitis, and eosinophilia were exclusions, as was daily use of > 10 mg of prednisone (or 20 mg on alternate days). There was a 2-week stabilization period during which the patients were instructed in the use of the small volume nebulizers, which they used three times daily with albuterol alone. They were asked to keep daily logs of peak flow rates, pulmonary symptoms, and additional medication usage. On their test day 1 the subjects came to the pulmonary function laboratory having been off theophylline for 24 hours and beta 2-agonists for 12 hours and performed a baseline spirometry. They then received their morning small volume nebulizer treatment of albuterol to which was added either 500 micrograms if ipratropium bromide or a saline placebo. Spirometry was repeated at 15, 30, and 60 minutes, and then hourly for 8 hours. Subjects then took home a 2-week supply of albuterol and test drug for thrice daily use in their small volume nebulizer. They were evaluated for pulmonary symptoms and adverse effects every 14 days. The 8-hour spirometry was repeated on test day 43 and finally on test day 85. Primary data evaluated were the peak increase in FEV1 and the area between the FEV1 baseline value and the 8-hour FEV1 curve. Similar calculations were made for forced vital capacity (FVC) and 25-75% forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75%). On test day 1 the peak increase in FEV1 for the ipratropium bromide + albuterol subjects was 26% greater than those on placebo + albuterol (p < 0.003). The area under the 8-hour FEV1 curve was 64% greater in those given ipratropium bromide on test day 1 (p < 0.0002). Similar increases were seen in FVC and FEF25-75%. The peak improvements in FEV1 and FVC with the addition of ipratropium bromide to albuterol were maintained on test days 43 and 85. Considering the safety and efficacy profiles of this combination, the data would suggest that ipratropium bromide inhalation solution should be considered first-line therapy for those patients with COPD requiring small volume nebulizer treatments. Although many asthmatic patients are treated with a combination of beta2 agonist and corticosteroid inhalers, the clinical effects of combining the drugs are unknown. Studies on the early asthmatic response to allergen suggest that beta2 agonists may reduce the benefit of inhaled corticosteroids. A study of the effects of combining the drugs on asthma control was undertaken.
                Sixty one subjects with mild to moderate asthma were randomised to a double blind crossover comparison of inhaled budesonide (200-400 microg twice daily), terbutaline (500-1000 microg four times daily), combined treatment, and placebo. Each treatment was given for six weeks following a four week washout period. Ipratropium was used for symptom relief. Treatments were ranked from worst (1) to best (4) based on need for oral steroid, mean morning peak flow, nocturnal awakening, ipratropium use, and asthma symptoms. Lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness were measured before and after each treatment.
                Evaluable data for all four treatments were obtained from 47 subjects. The mean rank of each treatment was: placebo = 2.05; terbutaline = 2.13; budesonide = 2.48; combined treatment = 3.34. Combined treatment was ranked significantly better than any other treatment (p<0.01). Mean (95% CI) morning and evening peak flows were 14 (5 to 23) and 24 (15 to 34) l/min higher, respectively, during combined treatment than during budesonide, and 27 (17 to 37) and 15 (7 to 23) l/min higher than during terbutaline. Asthma symptoms tended to be least frequent during combined treatment but were not significantly different from budesonide alone. There was no significant difference between combined treatment and budesonide alone for lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.
                In this group of mild to moderate asthmatic subjects the combination of beta2 agonist and corticosteroid gave better asthma control than either treatment alone. There was no evidence that regular beta2 agonist treatment impaired the beneficial effect of inhaled corticosteroid. Combination bronchodilator therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is available widely throughout the world except in North America. Previous studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the advantages of combining anticholinergic therapy with sympathomimetic therapy in COPD. We report the results of a 12-week prospective, double-blind, parallel-group evaluation of the use of the following: albuterol, a beta-adrenergic agent; ipratropium, an anticholinergic agent; or a combination of the two, administered by metered-dose inhaler to patients with moderately severe stable COPD. Following baseline studies, 534 patients were given one of the three test bronchodilator preparations to be used at home four times daily in addition to oral theophylline and corticosteroids as required. The doses of the latter two drugs were kept stable. Subjects were tested on days 1, 29, 57, and 85. Analysis of 1-s forced expiratory volume (FEV1) curves on those test days indicated that the combination was superior to either single agent alone in peak effect, in the effect during the first 4 h after dosing, and in the total area under the curve of the FEV1 response. The mean peak percent increases in FEV1 over baseline on the four test days were 31 to 33 percent for the combination, 24 to 25 percent for ipratropium, and 24 to 27 percent for albuterol. The differences between the combination and its components were statistically significant on all test days. The AUC0-4 means for the combination were 21 to 44 percent greater than the ipratropium means and 30 to 46 percent greater than the albuterol means. Similar changes were noted in the forced vital capacity curves. Symptom scores did not change over time and did not differ among the treatment groups. We conclude that the combination of ipratropium and albuterol, when given by metered-dose inhaler to patients with COPD, is more effective than either of the two agents alone. The advantage of the combination is apparent primarily during the first 4 h after administration. The availability of combination therapy by metered-dose inhaler should help to improve patient compliance. Bronchodilators are routinely used in the long-term therapy of patients with COPD. These drugs are generally evaluated for their short-term bronchodilatory effects. Long-term and short-term benefits, however, are not necessarily equivalent. We evaluated, therefore, the effects of extended therapy with inhaled bronchodilators in patients with COPD.
                Data were obtained from seven clinical trials in which ipratropium was compared with a beta-agonist over a 90-day treatment interval. This comprised all the available data from clinical trials performed for registration of ipratropium and included 1,445 evaluable patients. Results of pulmonary function tests were evaluated prior to and after short-term administration of bronchodilator both before and after the 90-day treatment period. In addition, data were analyzed after stratification for smoking status and for lung function.
                Long-term therapy with ipratropium resulted in improvement in baseline (ie, before short-term administration of bronchodilator) FEV1 (28 mL; p < 0.01) and FVC (131 mL; p < 0.01), while long-term therapy with beta-agonist resulted in no significant change in FEV1 (1-mL decline; p > 0.2) or in FVC (20-mL improvement; p > 0.2). The improvement in baseline function in the ipratropium-treated patients was most marked in ex-smokers (average duration of abstinence, 9 years). Short-term administration of ipratropium following the 90-day treatment interval resulted in similar response in average FEV1 (6 mL more improvement after the extended therapy; p > 0.2) and an increased response in average FVC (44 mL more improvement after extended therapy; p < 0.01). In contrast, extended therapy with beta-agonist resulted in significantly less response to the short-term administration of beta-agonist for both FEV1 (49 mL less response; p < 0.0001) and FVC (74 mL less response; p < 0.0001). Assessed as the percentage of patients who achieved a 15% improvement in lung function, most patients responded to both treatments both before and after extended therapy. There was, however, a significant decline in the number of patients who responded after extended therapy, and this was more marked for the beta-agonist treated group.
                Long-term benefits of bronchodilator therapy appear to differ from short-term effects. Extended administration of ipratropium appears to be associated with improved baseline lung function and perhaps with improvement in the response to acute bronchodilation. Extended administration of beta-agonist, in contrast, appears to have little effect on baseline lung function, but may decrease response to acute bronchodilation. The role of the anticholinergic drug, ipratropium bromide, in maintenance antiasthmatic therapy was evaluated in a double-blind crossover trial of three bronchodilator regimens: (1) inhaled ipratropium, placebo, and oral oxtriphylline; (2) inhaled fenoterol, placebo, and oral oxtriphylline; and (3) both inhaled ipratropium and fenoterol plus oral oxtriphylline. Twenty-two asthmatics were treated with all three regimens, each for 1 mo, allocated in random sequence. On the first and last treatment days of each month, spirometric measurements were performed before and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hr after administration of the test drugs. On the first treatment day of each month, all regimens produced significant bronchodilatation at 30 min after dose, an improvement that declined between 3 and 6 hr after dose. After continuous administration for 1 mo the two combinations employing fenoterol showed a decline in bronchodilator responsiveness from the initial treatment day, measured as the level of response (V50) or duration of response (FEV1, VC). Ipratropium plus oxtriphylline showed no such decline, suggesting the development of tolerance to long-term administration of fenoterol. Overall benefit at the end of 1 mo, measured as the area under the curves of FEV1, VC, or V50 vs time after dose, was greatest for the triple drug regimen. There were no differences in heart rate, blood pressure response, or side effects among the three treatments. It is concluded that when the anticholinergic drug ipratropium is administered concurrently with an inhaled beta 2 agonist and an oral theophylline derivative, increased bronchodilatation occurs with no detectable additional side effects. We compared the long-term safety and efficacy of the combination ipratropium bromide (IB) and albuterol sulfate (ALB) inhalation solution with that of each separate component using three-times-daily administration.
                Using a parallel design, we randomized patients to receive 3.0 mg ALB, 0.5 mg IB, or the combination by small-volume nebulizer (SVN) for 85 days. Subjects were allowed to use up to two extra doses of study medication daily for control of symptoms on an as-needed basis. The main efficacy evaluation was the acute pulmonary function response to an aerosol of the maintenance study medication over the course of the investigation. Physician global evaluation, subject quality of life assessments, COPD symptom scores, and twice-daily peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were also assessed over the study period.
                Twenty-five centers participated in the investigation.
                We studied 652 patients with moderate to severe COPD.
                Over the course of the study, the acute spirometric response and evening PEFR values with the SVN combination of IB plus ALB were statistically significantly better compared to ALB or IB alone. The quality of life scores, physician global evaluations, symptom scores, and morning PEFR scores were unchanged over the duration of the study in all treatment groups. There was no significant difference in adverse events in the three treatment groups.
                In patients with COPD, maintenance SVN therapy with IB and ALB provides better bronchodilation than either therapy alone without increasing side effects. Regular treatment with beta 2-adrenergic agonists is controversial in bronchial asthma. To investigate whether beta 2-adrenergic agonists can be used safely if associated with low doses of inhaled steroids, for a short period, without a deterioration of asthma control, we have examined 24 mild asthmatics. In a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 1 week of run-in and run-out period framed 3 weeks of treatment. All patients received inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP 250 micrograms t.i.d.); after 1 week, 12 patients inhaled 400 micrograms of broxaterol and 12 patients received placebo t.i.d. FVC, FEV1, PD20-FEV1 methacholine, morning and evening PEF, and PEF amplitude % mean were measured before, during, and after treatment. No significant changes were noted in patients receiving inhaled broxaterol. There were no differences in symptoms and the use of rescue medication (salbutamol spray). We conclude that short-term regular treatment with beta 2-adrenergic agonists is not associated with a deterioration in asthma control in mild asthmatics inhaling low doses of steroids. A study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of tiotropium and ipratropium during long term treatment in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
                288 patients of mean (SD) age 65 (8) years and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) 41 (12)% predicted participated in a 14 centre, double blind, double dummy, parallel group study and were randomised after a run in period of two weeks to receive either tiotropium 18 microg once daily from a dry powder inhaler (HandiHaler; two thirds of patients) or ipratropium 40 microg four times daily from a metered dose inhaler (one third of patients) for a period of 13 weeks. Outcome measures were lung function, daily records of peak expiratory flow (PEF), and the use of concomitant salbutamol. FEV(1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were measured one hour before and immediately before inhalation (mean value of the two measurements on test day 1 was the baseline value while on all other test days it was known as the trough FEV(1) and FVC), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after inhalation of the study drug on days 1, 8, 50, and 92.
                During treatment tiotropium achieved a significantly greater improvement than ipratropium (p<0.05) in trough, average, and peak FEV(1) levels and in trough and average FVC levels. The trough FEV(1) response on days 8, 50, and 92 ranged between 0.15 l (95% CI 0.11 to 0.19) and 0.16 l (95% CI 0.12 to 0.20) for tiotropium and between 0.01 l (95% CI -0.03 to 0.05) and 0.03 l (95% CI 0.01 to 0. 07) for ipratropium. The trough FVC response on days 8, 50, and 92 ranged between 0.34 l (95% CI 0.28 to 0.40) and 0.39 l (95% CI 0.31 to 0.47) for tiotropium and between 0.08 l (95% CI 0.00 to 0.16) and 0.18 l (95% CI 0.08 to 0.28) for ipratropium. On all test days tiotropium produced a greater improvement in FEV(1) than ipratropium starting three hours after inhalation (p<0.05). During treatment weekly mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) was consistently better in the tiotropium group than in the ipratropium group, the difference in morning PEF being significant up through week 10 and in evening PEF up through week 7 of treatment (p<0.05). The use of concomitant salbutamol was also lower in the tiotropium group (p<0.05). The only drug related adverse event was dry mouth (tiotropium 14.7%, ipratropium 10.3% of patients).
                Tiotropium in a dose of 18 microg inhaled once daily using the HandiHaler was significantly more effective than 40 microg ipratropium four times daily in improving trough, average, and peak lung function over the 13 week period. The safety profile of tiotropium was similar to ipratropium. These data support the use of tiotropium as first line treatment for the long term maintenance treatment of patients with airflow obstruction due to COPD. To determine the benefit of the addition of ipratropium bromide to beta-agonist therapy of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
                The trial was randomized and double blinded.
                The study was conducted in the emergency department of Parkland Memorial Hospital, a busy, inner-city, county hospital.
                Patients were treated in the medicine emergency department with either the standard regimen of nebulized isoetharine, 0.5 mL of a 1% solution (5.0 mg) diluted to 2.0 mL with normal saline every hour (control group) or with the same regimen plus ipratropium bromide, 54 micrograms (three puffs) after the first isoetharine treatment and 36 micrograms (two puffs) after the second and fourth (experimental group). A placebo metered-dose inhaler used in the same manner as the ipratropium blinded the study to both the patients and medical personnel.
                The group treated with the addition of ipratropium (30) was discharged from the ED an average of 91 minutes (P less than .05) sooner than the control group (25) and required on the average one less isoetharine treatment (P less than .05). The pulmonary functions tested, forced expiratory volume in the first second, and the forced vital capacity were the same in the two groups initially and on discharge, as identical discharge criteria were used in each group.
                The addition of ipratropium to standard beta-agonist treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations shortens the duration of treatment required in the ED.
The available data from the trials included in this review suggest that the advantage of regular long term use of ipratropium alone or in combination with a short-acting beta-2 agonist or over a beta-2 agonist alone are small, if the aim is to improve lung function, symptoms and exercise tolerance. Until further data are available, the strategy of providing a short-acting beta-2 agonist on a PRN basis, and then either continuing with the short-acting beta-2 agonist regularly or conducting an "n of 1" trial of regular beta-2 agonist or regular anticholinergic to determine the treatment that gives the best relief of symptoms (and continuing with it), would seem cost effective. This strategy does need formal evaluation. Patient preference is also important, as is the relative importance of avoiding the use of systemic corticosteroids.