Daily or alternate-day FSH therapy in patients with polycystic ovarian disease resistant to clomiphene citrate treatment. The clinical efficacy of low-dose step-up follicle stimulating hormone administration for treatment of unexplained infertility. Treatment of clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome with pure follicle-stimulating hormone or human menopausal gonadotropin. Efficacy of low dose purified FSH in ovulation induction following pituitary desensitization in polycystic ovarian syndrome.
The effectiveness of intramuscular follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) administered as daily or alternate-day injections to patients with polycystic ovarian disease (PCOD) who previously failed to ovulate on clomiphene citrate was compared. The study comprised 20 treatment cycles of daily FSH and 19 of alternate-day FSH in 12 patients. The overall ovulation rate per cycle was 78% and was similar for both groups. Nine out of 12 patients achieved a pregnancy, with twice as many occurring in the alternate-day group. It is concluded that alternate-day FSH therapy is as effective as daily FSH in achieving ovulation and pregnancies in patients with PCOD resistant to treatment with clomiphene citrate. The present study was designed to compare the clinical efficacy of low-dose step-up follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) administration with conventional FSH protocol (FSH was injected daily starting with a dose of 150 IU), both combined with intrauterine insemination (IUI), for the treatment of unexplained infertility. A total of 97 unexplained infertility couples was randomly assigned to one or other of the two treatment groups, either conventional FSH with IUI (48 patients) or low-dose step-up FSH with IUI (49 patients), and only the first treatment cycle was evaluated in each protocol. The difference in pregnancy rates per cycle was not statistically significant between the low-dose FSH group and the conventional group [seven of 49 (14.3%) and seven of 48 (14.6%) respectively]. A significant reduction in the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was observed in the low-dose group (8.3% versus 27.1%, P < 0.05). The incidence of moderate OHSS requiring hospitalization was reduced significantly in the low-dose group (low-dose 0% versus conventional 16.7%, P < 0.01). However, the low-dose protocol did not completely prevent multiple pregnancies. Our results suggest that the low-dose step-up FSH treatment appeared to be useful for the treatment of unexplained infertility because of the high pregnancy rates and the significant decrease in the incidence of OHSS. Two hundred ten treatment cycles of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) were completed in 49 patients with clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome. The results from 68 cycles of daily intramuscular (IM) FSH and 41 cycles of IM hMG were compared. The ovulation rate, maximum serum estradiol (E2) levels achieved, and pregnancy rate were similar in both groups, but FSH resulted in significantly fewer follicles developing and hyperstimulation. The 68 cycles of daily IM FSH were further compared with the outcome of administering the FSH as an alternate-day IM injection in 70 cycles, and by subcutaneous pulsatile injection in 31 cycles. There were no differences in any of the parameters measured between daily and alternate-day FSH. Pulsatile FSH required a greater total dose over a longer period of time to achieve stimulation. It also produced fewer follicles, a lower maximum serum E2 level, and the lowest incidence of hyperstimulation. Twenty pregnancies resulted, of which 6 aborted in the first trimester; there was 1 set of twins and 13 singleton pregnancies. The cumulative pregnancy rate after 6 treatment cycles was 62%. We evaluated the efficacy of ovulation induction using purified FSH in either low dose or conventional dosage in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome. We assessed whether gonadotrophin measurement by radioimmunoassay or immunoradiometric assay is a better indicator of whether pituitary desensitization with a GnRH agonist (Zoladex) has occurred.
                Two different protocols were used. Pituitary desensitization was carried out with a GnRH agonist (Zoladex, ICI Pharmaceuticals UK). The patients were then randomized into one of two treatment groups. Conventional dose protocol: Patients commenced with a daily FSH (Metrodin, Serono Laboratories Ltd, UK) dose of 75 units for at least 7 days. The FSH dose was then increased, if necessary, based on ultrasound scans and plasma oestradiol (E2) levels in 75-unit increments. Low dose protocol: The same protocol was used except that the starting dose of FSH was 37.5 units daily with increments of 37.5 units.
                Low dose protocol (six patients, six cycles). There was a high incidence of multiple follicular development (10.3 +/- 5.6 (+/- SD) follicles, 5.0 +/- 3.8 follicles > 14 mm in diameter). Three cycles resulted in ovulation, one was anovulatory and two patients underwent gamete intrafallopian transfer due to multiple follicular development. Conventional dose protocol (seven patients, eight cycles). Again there was multiple follicular development (10.1 +/- 8.6 follicles, 2.0 +/- 2.3 > 14 mm). Three cycles were ovulatory, one anovulatory, three abandoned due to multiple follicular development and one underwent gamete intrafallopian transfer with the development of severe hyperstimulation necessitating steroid therapy. There was no difference between the two protocols in the number of days of FSH administration (low dose protocol 26 +/- 6.5, conventional dose protocol 23 +/- 8.1 days), the total number of units of FSH given per patient was 2844 +/- 1816 vs 2635 +/- 1726. The peak E2 level (pmol/l) during FSH treatment was 3193 +/- 662 vs 2389 +/- 3099 and the rate of increase in the FSH dose in ampoules of Metrodin per day was 0.058 +/- 0.03 vs 0.057 +/- 0.03. All patients were 'downregulated' (E2 < 70 pmol/l) prior to ovulation induction. However, gonadotrophin levels (IU/l) were 4.3 +/- 1.5 (LH) and 2.8 +/- 1.2 (FSH) by radioimmunoassay and LH was unchanged throughout FSH treatment whereas LH measured by immunoradiometric assay was < 1.0 IU/l prior to ovulation induction and remained so throughout. The mean LH radioimmunoassay to immunoradiometric assay ratio was 6.2 +/- 2.1.
                We conclude that regardless of the starting dose the use of pure FSH in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome whose LH has been completely down regulated may be associated with multiple follicular development and a poor outcome. LH measured by radioimmunoassay is not a good indicator of whether pituitary densensitization has occurred but LH measured by immunoradiometric assay appears to be. These results strongly suggest that a basic minimum amount of LH is necessary for normal ovulatory development.
The use of a medium dose of long-acting FSH is a safe treatment option and equally effective compared to daily FSH. Further research is needed to determine if long-acting FSH is safe and effective for use in hyper- or poor responders and in women with all causes of subfertility.