Interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C. Hepatitis Interventional Therapy Group. Interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin for the treatment of relapse of chronic hepatitis C. International Hepatitis Interventional Therapy Group. Hepatitis C in adults and adolescents with hemophilia: a randomized, controlled trial of interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. Improved response to ribavirin interferon combination compared with interferon alone in patients with type 4 chronic hepatitis C without cirrhosis. High sustained response rate in patients with histologically mild (low grade and stage) chronic hepatitis C infection. A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial of interferon alpha-2b with and without ribavirin. The effect of interferon alfa and ribavirin combination therapy in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. Interferon-alpha 2b plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C after liver transplantation: a randomized study. Interferon versus ribavirin plus interferon in chronic hepatitis C previously resistant to interferon: a randomized trial. Ribavirin and interferon-alpha combination therapy vs interferon-alpha alone in the retreatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomized clinical trial. Maintenance therapy with ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C who fail to respond to combination therapy with interferon alfa and ribavirin. The safety and tolerability of daily infergen plus ribavirin in the treatment of naíïve chronic hepatitis C patients. Pilot study of a short course of ribavirin and alpha interferon in the treatment of chronic active hepatitis C not responding to alpha-interferon alone. Peginterferon alpha-2a combination therapies in chronic hepatitis C patients who relapsed after or had a viral breakthrough on therapy with standard interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin: a pilot study of efficacy and safety. A randomized study comparing ribavirin and interferon alfa monotherapy for hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Peginterferon Alfa-2a plus ribavirin versus interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-coinfected persons. Reduction of relapse rates by 18-month treatment in chronic hepatitis C. A Benelux randomized trial in 300 patients. Combination treatment of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in comparison to interferon monotherapy in treatment of chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 patients. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients with interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin. Daily versus thrice-weekly interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected persons: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Prolonged therapy of advanced chronic hepatitis C with low-dose peginterferon. Long-term efficacy of ribavirin plus interferon alfa in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Clinical comparison of high-dose interferon-alpha2b with or without ribavirin for treatment of interferon-relapsed chronic hepatitis C. Interferon-alpha plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C resistant to previous interferon-alpha course: results of a randomized multicenter trial. Retreatment of non-responder or relapser chronic hepatitis C patients with interferon plus ribavirin vs interferon alone. A randomized, controlled trial of triple antiviral therapy as initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients. A randomized trial of induction doses of interferon alone or in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine for treatment of nonresponder patients with chronic hepatitis C. Antiviral action of ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C. Sequential versus concomitant administration of ribavirin and interferon alfa-n3 in patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to interferon alone: results of a randomized, controlled trial. Retreatment of hepatitis C non-responsive to interferon. A placebo controlled randomized trial of ribavirin monotherapy versus combination therapy with Ribavirin and Interferon in 121 patients in the Benelux [ISRCTN53821378]. Interferon-alpha alone versus interferon-alpha plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to previous interferon-alpha treatment. Treatment with interferon-alpha2a alone or interferon-alpha2a plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C previously treated with interferon-alpha2a. CONSTRUCT Group. Treatment of hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis: a randomized, controlled trial of interferon alfa-2b versus no treatment. Ribavirin and interferon alfa-2b in chronic hepatitis C: assessment of possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. Peginterferon alpha-2a (40 KD) plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Japanese patients. Peginterferon Alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected patients. Evaluation of ribavirin efficacy and tolerance in subjects with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Pegylated interferon alfa-2b vs standard interferon alfa-2b, plus ribavirin, for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients: a randomized controlled trial. Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for treatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patients. Induction interferon and ribavirin for re-treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients unresponsive to interferon alone. Randomised trial of interferon alpha2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks or for 24 weeks versus interferon alpha2b plus placebo for 48 weeks for treatment of chronic infection with hepatitis C virus. International Hepatitis Interventional Therapy Group (IHIT) R1626 plus peginterferon Alfa-2a provides potent suppression of hepatitis C virus RNA and significant antiviral synergy in combination with ribavirin. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients who failed interferon monotherapy: effects of higher doses of interferon and ribavirin combination therapy. The Virginia Cooperative Hepatitis Treatment Group. Interferon-alpha-2b and ribavirin for retreatment of chronic hepatitis C. Interferon alpha-2B and ribavirin in combination for patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to, or relapsed after, interferon alpha therapy: a randomized trial. High-dose interferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C not responding to recombinant alpha-interferon. Evaluation of long-term efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in combination in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C: an Italian multicenter experience. Ribavirin-Interferon in Chronic Hepatitis Italian Group Investigators. A potent antiviral effect on hepatitis C viral dynamics in serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells during combination therapy with high-dose daily interferon alfa plus ribavirin and intravenous twice-daily treatment with interferon beta. Efficacy of 5 MU of interferon in combination with ribavirin for naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus: a randomized controlled trial. Interferon alpha plus ketoprofen or interferon alpha plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C non-responder to interferon alpha alone: results of a pilot study. A dose-ranging study of pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C. The Hepatitis C Intervention Therapy Group. High-dose vitamin E supplementation does not diminish ribavirin-associated haemolysis in hepatitis C treatment with combination standard alpha-interferon and ribavirin.
Only 15 to 20 percent of patients with chronic hepatitis C have a sustained virologic response to interferon therapy. We compared the efficacy and safety of recombinant interferon alfa-2b alone with those of a combination of interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for the initial treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C.
                We randomly assigned 912 patients with chronic hepatitis C to receive standard-dose interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg orally per day, depending on body weight) for 24 or 48 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by measurements of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA and serum aminotransferases and by liver biopsy.
                The rate of sustained virologic response (defined as an undetectable serum HCV RNA level 24 weeks after treatment was completed) was higher among patients who received combination therapy for either 24 weeks (70 of 228 patients, 31 percent) or 48 weeks (87 of 228 patients, 38 percent) than among patients who received interferon alone for either 24 weeks (13 of 231 patients, 6 percent) or 48 weeks (29 of 225 patients, 13 percent) (P<0.001 for the comparison of interferon alone with both 24 weeks and 48 weeks of combination treatment). Among patients with HCV genotype 1 infection, the best response occurred in those who were treated for 48 weeks with interferon and ribavirin. Histologic improvement was more common in patients who were treated with combination therapy for either 24 weeks (57 percent) or 48 weeks (61 percent) than in those who were treated with interferon alone for either 24 weeks (44 percent) or 48 weeks (41 percent). The drug doses had to be reduced and treatment discontinued more often in patients who were treated with combination therapy.
                In patients with chronic hepatitis C, initial therapy with interferon and ribavirin was more effective than treatment with interferon alone. Interferon alfa is the only effective treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Forty percent of patients have an initial response to this therapy, but most subsequently relapse. We compared the effect of interferon alone with that of interferon plus oral ribavirin for relapses of chronic hepatitis C.
                We studied 345 patients with chronic hepatitis C who relapsed after interferon treatment. A total of 173 patients were randomly assigned to receive standard-dose recombinant interferon alfa-2b concurrently with ribavirin (1000 to 1200 mg orally per day, depending on body weight) for six months, and 172 patients were assigned to receive interferon and placebo.
                At the completion of treatment, serum levels of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA were undetectable in 141 of the 173 patients who were treated with interferon and ribavirin and in 80 of the 172 patients who were treated with interferon alone (82 percent vs. 47 percent, P<0.001). Serum HCV RNA levels remained undetectable 24 weeks after the end of treatment in 84 patients (49 percent) in the combination-therapy group, but in only 8 patients (5 percent) in the interferon group (P<0.001). Sustained normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase concentrations and histologic improvement were highly correlated with virologic response. Base-line serum HCV RNA levels of 2 x 10(6) copies per milliliter or less were associated with higher rates of response in both treatment groups. Viral genotypes other than type 1 were associated with sustained responses only in the combination-therapy group. Combined therapy caused a predictable fall in hemoglobin concentrations but otherwise had a safety profile similar to that of interferon alone.
                In patients with chronic hepatitis C who relapse after treatment with interferon, therapy with interferon and oral ribavirin results in higher rates of sustained virologic, biochemical, and histologic response than treatment with interferon alone. Adolescents and adults with inherited disorders of coagulation have one of the highest prevalence rates of hepatitis C among known risk groups. Few data are available on the use of combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin in this population. Patients 13 years of age and older who were positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA by polymerase chain reaction and negative for human immunodeficiency virus were randomized to receive interferon alfa-2b (3 million units 3 times a week) plus ribavirin (1,000 mg/day) or interferon alfa-2b alone for 48 weeks with 24 weeks of posttreatment follow-up. Patients started on interferon alone who remained positive for HCV RNA at week 12 crossed over to treatment with interferon plus ribavirin. A total of 113 patients were treated. Thirty-seven patients were younger than 18 years. At the end of treatment, 18 of 56 (32%) treated with interferon plus ribavirin and 6 of 57 (11%) treated with interferon alone were negative for HCV RNA (P =.005). Sustained virologic response in the combination arm was 29% (16 of 56) compared with 7% (4 of 57) for those started on interferon alone (P =.027). Among adolescents younger than 18 years who were treated with combination therapy, 10 of 17 (59%) had sustained response compared with 6 of 39 (15%) of adult patients on the same regimen (P =.001). In conclusion, in this U.S. multicenter, randomized trial of therapy for HCV in patients with inherited bleeding disorders, sustained virologic response rate was significantly improved for patients treated with interferon and ribavirin compared with those started on interferon alone. Adolescents treated with combination therapy had a significantly higher sustained response than adults did on the same regimen. Response to treatment with alpha interferon with or without concomitant ribavirin varies according to the viral genotype in patients with chronic hepatitis C.
                This study was undertaken in order to determine the response of genotype 4 chronic hepatitis C to interferon and ribavirin combination compared to interferon alone in patients without cirrhosis.
                Fifty-two patients were given interferon alone at a dose of 5 million units, 3 times a week and another 60 patients were administered with interferon combined with ribavarin (1,000-1,200 mg/ day) for 24 weeks. Sustained biochemical response was defined as normal ALT, 6 months after end of therapy. Sustained virologic response was defined as negative HCV RNA, 6 months after the end of therapy.
                Only 10/52 (19%) patients showed sustained biochemical response after interferon alone, while 31/60 (52%) showed sustained biochemical response after interferon combined with ribavirin (p<0.01). Only 4/52 (8%) patients showed sustained virologic response after interferon alone, while 25/60 (42%) showed sustained virologic response after interferon combined with ribavirin (p<0.001).
                These results show that patients with chronic hepatitis due to hepatitis C virus type 4 show a poor response to interferon alone but a better response to interferon combined with ribavirin. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapy for patients with histologically mild hepatitis C virus (HCV) liver disease.
                A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial of interferon alpha-2b with or without ribavirin.
                Regional and university hospitals.
                One hundred and sixteen treatment naive patients with mild chronic HCV infection. Mild HCV infection was defined according to Knodell as a grade score of > or = 1 and < or = 6 and a stage score of < or = 1.
                Interferon alpha-2b (3 MU three times weekly) for 52 weeks in combination with either ribavirin or a matched placebo.
                The study endpoint was the absence of HCV RNA in plasma and liver tissue 26 weeks post-treatment. In addition, liver histology was compared pre- and post-treatment.
                Combination therapy was superior to interferon monotherapy, with a virological sustained response rate of 54% (31/57) and 20% (12/59), respectively, in both serum and liver tissue (P = 0.001). The sustained response rate was higher with combination therapy than monotherapy both in genotype non-1 (81% vs 36%) and in genotype 1 (28% vs 4%). There was a significant improvement in mean grade score in all sustained responders, irrespective of treatment arm.
                Combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin was safe and as effective in patients with histologically mild HCV infection as previously reported for more advanced disease. Chronic hepatitis C may lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in a subset of patients. Because response rates with interferon alfa therapy are unsatisfactory, new therapies are needed.
                We conducted a three-arm, randomized trial in 45 interferon-naive men (mean age 40.6 +/- 12 years) with chronic hepatitis C to compare treatments: group A, ribavirin alone (15 mg/kg daily for 6 months); group B, interferon alone (3 MU thrice weekly for 6 months); and group C, interferon plus ribavirin at the above doses. Histologic outcomes of therapy were assessed by pretreatment and post-treatment liver biopsies.
                In group A, alanine aminotransferase levels normalized during therapy in 66% of those with HCV-1b and 34% of those with HCV-2a, but all patients relapsed after treatment ended. In group B, alanine aminotransferase levels normalized during treatment in 66%, 75%, and 100% of patients infected with HCV-1b, HCV-2a, and HCV-3, respectively; however, a sustained response was noted in only 25% of those with HCV-3. In group C, a sustained normalization of alanine aminotransferase with negative serum HCV RNA was seen in 20% of those with HCV-1b, 40% of those with HCV-2a, and 75% of those with HCV-3 12 months after therapy. One year after therapy ended, group C demonstrated a significant sustained response (47%) as well as a significant reduction in piecemeal necrosis and portal inflammation (p < 0.05).
                Combination therapy was significantly superior to ribavirin or interferon monotherapy in producing a sustained response in interferon-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C (p < 0.05). The results of our study suggest that ribavirin potentiates the effect of interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection after liver transplantation is frequent and leads to chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. The use of antiviral therapy in this situation remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation.
                Transplant recipients with recurrent chronic hepatitis C were randomized to receive either no treatment or therapy with interferon alfa-2b (3 MU 3 times a week) plus 1000-1200 mg/day ribavirin for 1 year. Patients were followed up for 6 months after the end of treatment. The primary end point was loss of HCV RNA 6 months after the end of treatment.
                Fifty-two patients were randomized (treatment, 28; placebo, 24). Sixteen patients were withdrawn from the study; 12 (43%) were from the treated group (mainly for anemia [7 patients]) and 4 (17%) from the control group. In the treated group, serum HCV RNA was undetectable in 9 patients (32%) at the end of treatment and 6 (21.4%) at the end of the follow-up period, whereas no patient in the control group lost HCV RNA at any point (P = 0.036 at the end of follow-up). However, there was no significant histologic improvement.
                The combination of interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin induced a sustained virologic response in 21% of transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C. However, 43% discontinued therapy due to adverse events (primarily severe anemia). Strategies to enable treatment with lower doses of ribavirin need to be explored. More than 70% of patients with chronic hepatitis C are resistant to interferon therapy. Ribavirin, in association with interferon, has been demonstrated as effective, at a dose of 800-1200 mg/day, but the efficacy of a lower dose has not been established.
                We assessed the effectiveness of the combination of 600 mg/day of ribavirin plus 3 MU of interferon over a period of 6 months, in a group of patients previously resistant to interferon. Sixty-two patients with chronic hepatitis C with serum and hepatic HCV RNA relapsers or non-responders to interferon, were randomly divided into two groups: group A received 3 MU of interferon alpha-2b, three times a week for 6 months; group B was given the same dose plus 600 mg per day of ribavirin for 6 months. Two patients from each group dropped from therapy. One patient from group A and two from group B withdrew from treatment because of adverse effects.
                Mean alanine aminotransferase levels were similar in both groups throughout the study. A sustained response was observed in 7% and 7.4% of groups A and B with short-term response in 39% and 59%, and no response in 54% and 34% from both groups respectively (non-significant). At 12 months, 4 and 7 patients from groups A and B respectively, cleared serum HCV RNA however, only one sustained responder from each group cleared HCV RNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. At 18 months, 3 patients remained serum HCV RNA negative. Adverse effects were similar. Only haemoglobin values were lower in group B in the first month of therapy (p<0.05).
                In conclusion, the combination of 3 MU of interferon plus 600 mg of ribavirin is not effective in chronic hepatitis C resistant to interferon. Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) induces sustained remission of chronic hepatitis C in approximately 25% of patients. In patients who are non-responders to the first course of therapy, retreatment with IFN-alpha is of limited efficacy. Ribavirin has also been used to treat chronic hepatitis C, but it induces only a transient response. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of ribavirin and IFN-alpha combination therapy for IFN-alpha resistant chronic hepatitis C. Twenty-four IFN-alpha non-responders and 24 relapsers were randomized to receive either ribavirin (1000 mg per day) together with IFN-alpha (3-6 million units (MU) thrice weekly) or the same dose of IFN-alpha alone, for 6 months. Both at the end of treatment and 6 months later, normal transaminase levels were more common in the patients receiving combination therapy than in the group receiving IFN-alpha alone: 17 (70.8%) vs seven (29.2%) patients (P = 0.009) and six (25%) vs one (4.2%) patient (P = 0.034), respectively. At the end of treatment and 6 months later, serum HCV RNA was no longer detectable in eight (33.3%) and five (20.8%) patients in the combination therapy group and in six (25%) and one (4.2%) patient in the IFN-alpha therapy group, respectively. Three patients (12.5%) were withdrawn prematurely from combination therapy because of side-effects; ribavirin therapy was ceased or dosage reduced in six other patients (25%), again because of side-effects. In conclusion, this combination treatment was more effective than retreatment with IFN-alpha, alone, in inducing sustained biochemical remission of chronic hepatitis C that was resistant to a previous course of IFN-alpha. The combination treatment, however, was frequently associated with significant side-effects. To assess the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with ribavirin alone in chronic hepatitis C, 108 patients were treated with the combination of interferon alfa and ribavirin for 24 weeks; those who failed to have a virologic response were offered enrollment in a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of ribavirin (1,000-1,200 mg daily) versus placebo for the subsequent 48 weeks. Patients were monitored at regular intervals with symptom questionnaires, serum aminotransferase levels, hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels, and complete blood counts and underwent liver biopsy at the completion of therapy. Among 108 patients, 50 were still HCV RNA positive after 24 weeks of treatment, of whom 34 agreed to be randomized to continue either ribavirin monotherapy or placebo. Among 17 patients who received placebo, there was no overall improvement in symptoms, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, HCV RNA levels, or hepatic histology. Among the 17 patients who received ribavirin, serum ALT levels and necroinflammatory features of liver histology were improved, whereas symptoms, HCV RNA levels, and hepatic fibrosis scores were not changed significantly from baseline. Responses to ribavirin seemed to be categorical, such that 8 patients (47%) had definite improvement in liver histology. Patients with improved histology had improvements in serum ALT levels both on combination therapy and after switching to ribavirin monotherapy. In conclusion, continuation of ribavirin monotherapy may maintain serum biochemical improvements that occur during interferon-ribavirin combination therapy in some patients and that these improvements are often associated with decreases in necroinflammatory changes in the liver. Whether these improvements will ultimately result in prevention of progression of hepatitis C requires further study. The treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients was enhanced when the combination of interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin was shown to be safe and more effective than interferon monotherapy. To date, no published reports have addressed the use of consensus interferon (CIFN) when combined with ribavirin. We conducted a pilot study to compare the safety and tolerability of daily CIFN plus ribavirin to CIFN monotherapy for the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients. Forty subjects were randomized to two treatment groups; CIFN 9 microg daily, or CIFN 9 microg daily plus ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg daily. All subjects received 48 weeks of therapy except for nongenotype 1 subjects in the combination treatment group who received only 24 weeks of therapy. The results show that at baseline, age, gender, risk factors, race, RNA titres, and liver histology were not different between the two groups. The proportion of subjects with genotype 1 infection was 50% (10/20) and 55% (11/20) for the monotherapy and combination therapy groups, respectively. Fifty (10/20) and sixty-five (13/20) per cent of subjects in the monotherapy and combination therapy groups exhibited a 2-log or greater decrease in viral titre at week 12 (P = NS). Using intent-to-treat analysis, 20% and 40% of enrolled subjects exhibited a sustained viral response in the monotherapy and combination therapy groups, respectively (P = NS). The proportion of subjects requiring dose reduction was 55% (11/20) and 65% (13/20), respectively. Study discontinuations for any reason were 25% (5/20) and 35% (7/20) for the monotherapy and combination groups, respectively. Discontinuations due to adverse events related to study drug were 20% (4/20) and 25% (5/20), respectively. A total of four serious adverse events occurred, two in each treatment group, only one of which was determined to be study-drug related. It is concluded that the safety and tolerability profiles of the two treatments were similar suggesting that daily dosing of CIFN may be difficult to tolerate resulting in discontinuation of therapy in a significant proportion of patients. The combination regimen resulted in a trend towards a higher viral response rate than monotherapy treatment. These data suggest that CIFN may be safely combined with ribavirin and may enhance the sustained response rate but is not well tolerated in US patients when given in a daily dosing regimen. Chronic active hepatitis due to HCV represents a severe progressive disorder of the liver, At present, Interferon seems to be the most efficacious treatment available, however, only 20-25% of the patients treated achieve complete remission. The efficacy has, therefore, been evaluated of Ribavirin, a nucleoside analogue active both on DNA and RNA viruses, in the treatment of non responders to a previous course of interferon. Twenty patients were randomly assigned to two groups: A) received the association R (800 mg/day for 2 months)+interferon (9 Mu/week for 6 months); B) received IFN (9 Mu/week for 6 months). All patients completed the study without important side effects. Four patients in group A presented reduced ALT and loss of viraemia during treatment with Ribavirin. Only one patient in group B had reduced indices of cell lysis and was negative for HCV-RNA during the course of the study. However, viremia and an increase of ALT values were observed in all of these subjects once treatment was interrupted. The results emerging from this study indicate that Ribavirin therapy, at the dose and duration of treatment employed, is not sufficient to change the natural course of events of chronic active hepatitis from HCV. There are no established therapeutic regimens for hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients who relapse following treatment with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin or those who break through while on interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin. We therefore evaluated various combination therapies in HCV patients who relapsed or experienced a viral breakthrough. Patients (n = 124) were randomized to 48 weeks of treatment with once-weekly subcutaneous injections of 180 microg pegylated (peg-) interferon alpha-2a plus oral ribavirin (800-1000 mg/day), mycophenolate mofetil (2 g/day), amantadine (200 mg/day), or ribavirin and amantadine and followed for an additional 24 weeks. The sustained virologic response was higher in patients administered peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin (38%) or ribavirin and amantadine (45%) than in those administered peginterferon alpha-2a plus mycophenolate mofetil (17%) or amantadine (10%). As in previous studies, patients with genotype non-1 and those with lower viral loads had better responses than those with genotype 1 and high viral loads, though the differences did not reach significance. The four treatment regimens had similar safety profiles, except that patients receiving ribavirin had greater maximal hemoglobin decreases. These findings suggest that the combination of peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin or with ribavirin and amantadine is effective in some HCV patients who relapse after treatment with interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection usually recurs after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), and most patients develop graft damage. This study compared the efficacy of interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) and ribavirin monotherapies in liver transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C in the graft. Thirty OLT recipients with chronic hepatitis C were randomized to receive either IFN-alpha (3 MU three times a week) or ribavirin (up to 1.2 g daily) for 24 weeks. Virological, biochemical, and histological responses to treatment were assessed. Twenty-eight patients completed the treatment regimen, two ribavirin-treated patients being withdrawn because of severe hemolysis. Normalization of serum aspartate aminotransferase was achieved in 13 of 14 patients receiving ribavirin (93%) and 6 of 14 patients receiving IFN-alpha (43%; P=.01). Lobular inflammation was reduced in 9/14 ribavirin-treated (64%) and 3 of 14 IFN-alpha-treated patients (21%; P=.05), each of whom had a biochemical response. However, the total histological activity index did not improve in either the interferon (P=.43) or the ribavirin (P=.96) group. Posttreatment viremia levels were significantly reduced in IFN-alpha-treated (P=.05) but not in ribavirin-treated (P=.88) patients. Hemolysis occurred in all ribavirin-treated patients, with serum hemoglobin decreasing to < 10 g/dL in 50%. Total leukocyte and lymphocyte counts decreased significantly during ribavirin treatment (P=.02 and P=.004, respectively). We concluded that in patients with chronic hepatitis C after OLT, IFN-alpha retains an antiviral effect whereas ribavirin is superior in achieving normalization of serum aspartate aminotransferase levels and reducing lobular inflammation, but not the total histological activity index. These findings provide a rationale for combination therapy in the post-OLT setting, although patients must be carefully monitored for hemolysis. Treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a alone produces significantly higher sustained virologic responses than treatment with interferon alfa-2a alone in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We compared the efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin, interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin, and peginterferon alfa-2a alone in the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C.
                A total of 1121 patients were randomly assigned to treatment and received at least one dose of study medication, consisting of 180 microg of peginterferon alfa-2a once weekly plus daily ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg, depending on body weight), weekly peginterferon alfa-2a plus daily placebo, or 3 million units of interferon alfa-2b thrice weekly plus daily ribavirin for 48 weeks.
                A significantly higher proportion of patients who received peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin had a sustained virologic response (defined as the absence of detectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after cessation of therapy) than of patients who received interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin (56 percent vs. 44 percent, P<0.001) or peginterferon alfa-2a alone (56 percent vs. 29 percent, P<0.001). The proportions of patients with HCV genotype 1 who had sustained virologic responses were 46 percent, 36 percent, and 21 percent, respectively, for the three regimens. Among patients with HCV genotype 1 and high base-line levels of HCV RNA, the proportions of those with sustained virologic responses were 41 percent, 33 percent, and 13 percent, respectively. The overall safety profiles of the three treatment regimens were similar; the incidence of influenza-like symptoms and depression was lower in the groups receiving peginterferon alfa-2a than in the group receiving interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin.
                In patients with chronic hepatitis C, once-weekly peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin was tolerated as well as interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin and produced significant improvements in the rate of sustained virologic response, as compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin or peginterferon alfa-2a alone.
                Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a cause of major complications in persons who are also infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, the treatment of HCV infection in such persons has been associated with a high rate of intolerance and a low rate of response. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing peginterferon plus ribavirin with interferon plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in persons coinfected with HIV.
                A total of 66 subjects were randomly assigned to receive 180 microg of peginterferon alfa-2a weekly for 48 weeks, and 67 subjects were assigned to receive 6 million IU of interferon alfa-2a three times weekly for 12 weeks followed by 3 million IU three times weekly for 36 weeks. Both groups received ribavirin according to a dose-escalation schedule. At week 24, subjects who did not have a virologic response (those who had an HCV RNA level greater than or equal to 60 IU per milliliter) underwent liver biopsy, and medications were continued in subjects with either a virologic response or histologic improvement.
                Treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin was associated with a significantly higher rate of sustained virologic response (an HCV RNA level of less than 60 IU per milliliter 24 weeks after completion of therapy) than was treatment with interferon and ribavirin (27 percent vs. 12 percent, P=0.03). In the group given peginterferon and ribavirin, only 14 percent of subjects with HCV genotype 1 infection had a sustained virologic response (7 of 51), as compared with 73 percent of subjects with an HCV genotype other than 1 (11 of 15, P<0.001). Histologic responses were observed in 35 percent of subjects with no virologic response who underwent liver biopsy.
                In persons infected with HIV, the combination of peginterferon and ribavirin is superior to the combination of interferon and ribavirin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. These regimens may provide clinical benefit even in the absence of virologic clearance. The marked discrepancy in the rates of sustained virologic response between HCV genotypes indicates that strategies are needed to improve the outcome in persons infected with HCV genotype 1.
                Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society Treatment of chronic hepatitis C with interferon can be ineffective due to relapse. We aimed to reduce the 40% relapse rate of 6 months interferon-ribavirin combination therapy by prolonging treatment to 18 months.
                Three hundred patients with treatment-naive hepatitis C, were randomized to 18 months combination therapy with interferon (3MU tiw) and ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day), 18 months interferon combined with placebo, or 6 months combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin, in a double blinded manner. All 295 patients who received at least one dose of treatment were included in the intention to treat analysis.
                At the end of treatment, HCV RNA was undetectable in 55 and 49% of those on 6 and 18 months combination therapy, respectively, versus 26% of those on monotherapy (P<0.001). The relapse rate was 38% for 6 months combination therapy, 38% for 18 months monotherapy, and only 13% for 18 months combination treatment (P=0.002). The sustained response rates were 34% for 6 months combination therapy, 16% for 18 months monotherapy and 43% for 18 months combination therapy (P<0.05).
                Reduction of relapse rates to 15% or less is feasible by prolongation of interferon-ribavirin treatment to 18 months. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients, infected with genotype 4 with interferon-alpha yielded a limited response. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of interferon-alpha alone and in combination with ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients infected with genotype 4.
                Fifty-two chronic hepatitis C patients (all males) infected with genotype 4, who had not received interferon, were randomized into 2 equal comparable groups.
                Group I received interferon alpha-2b "Schering Plough" 3 MU, tiw combined with ribavirin (1000 mg/day). Group II received interferon alpha-2b alone in the same dose. Both groups were evaluated monthly, at the end of 24 weeks of treatment and 24 weeks later. Two patients were dropped from group I and one patient from group II.
                Biochemical response: at the end of treatment, a return to normal of ALT was obtained in 16/24 (66.7%) patients on combination therapy vs 8/25 (32%) patients on interferon alone (p = 0.0152). At the end of follow-up, a sustained response was achieved in 10/24 (41.7%) patients on combination therapy vs 4/25 (16%) patients on interferon (p = 0.0468). Virologic response: at the end of treatment, the rates of virological response were higher in the patients on combination therapy 9/24 (37.5%) than in those on interferon 4/25 (16%) (p = 0.0380). At the end of follow-up, loss of serum HCV RNA was reported in 5/24 (20.8%) patients on combination therapy vs 2/25 (8%) patients on interferon (p = 0.1916). Histologic response: mild histologic improvement was shown by a decrease in the inflammatory score, which was highest in patients in the combination group.
                In chronic hepatitis C patients infected with genotype 4, combination therapy with interferon-alpha and ribavirin was more effective than treatment with interferon monotherapy. At the end of the follow-up, about 50% of patients in both groups were still viraemic though their ALT remained normal. One hundred six HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were randomized to receive ribavirin (RBV) 400 mg bid plus interferon alpha-2b (IFN-alpha) at two different doses, 3 mU tiw (control arm) or 5 mU daily for the first 6 weeks, followed by 3 mU tiw until completing 6 months of therapy (induction arm). All patients had CD4 counts above 350 cells/microl and 89% were taking antiretroviral therapy. Adverse effects leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 12.3% of patients, a rate quite similar to that seen in HCV-monoinfected patients. Negative serum HCV-RNA values (< 60 IU/ml) were recorded in 24.7% and 35.5% of patients at 3 and 6 months of therapy. However, in the intent-to-treat analysis, sustained response was reached by only 16% of patients (22.4% in the on-treatment analysis). No differences between treatment arms were noticed. Patients with HCV genotypes 2 or 3 had a 7-fold higher response rate than those with HCV genotypes 1 or 4. Therefore, early, end-of-treatment, and sustained response rates are lower in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients treated with RBV/IFN-alpha combination therapy. Since HCV-related liver disease is currently one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among HIV-infected patients, new treatment options are urgently needed for coinfected individuals. Among HIV-infected persons, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection causes substantial morbidity and mortality. However, few studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of interferon alfa (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy in co-infected persons. Accordingly, a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial was conducted to establish the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of IFN alfa-2b 3 mIU daily plus RBV 800 mg/d compared with IFN alfa-2b 3 mIU thrice weekly (TIW) plus RBV 800 mg/d in HCV treatment-naive, HIV-infected subjects with compensated liver disease and stable HIV disease. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as an undetectable HCV RNA level 24 weeks after discontinuation of HCV therapy. At study entry, subjects in both groups were similar with respect to age, gender, HCV genotype, and HIV disease status. Of 180 randomized subjects, 162 received at least 1 dose of study medication, constituting the modified intention-to-treat population. After 12 weeks of therapy, 122 (75%) had serum HCV RNA levels assessed; of these subjects, early virologic response (undetectable HCV RNA or >2 log10 decrease from baseline) was observed in 33 (42%) and 13 (16%) of subjects taking daily and TIW IFN, respectively (P < 0.001). SVR was observed in 15 (19.0%) and 7 (8.4%) of subjects taking daily and TIW IFN, respectively (P = 0.05). Adverse events were similar in both groups. However, while no deaths or opportunistic infections were observed, nearly 30% of subjects stopped treatment due to adverse events and 7 subjects experienced a serious adverse event. In conclusion, SVR was achieved in 19% of HIV/HCV coinfected subjects treated with daily IFN plus RBV, but the effectiveness of therapy was substantially diminished by relatively high rates of treatment-related toxicity. In patients with chronic hepatitis C who do not have a response to antiviral treatment, the disease may progress to cirrhosis, liver failure, hepatocellular carcinoma, and death. Whether long-term antiviral therapy can prevent progressive liver disease in such patients remains uncertain.
                We conducted a randomized, controlled trial of peginterferon alfa-2a at a dosage of 90 microg per week for 3.5 years, as compared with no treatment, in 1050 patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis who had not had a response to previous therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin. The patients, who were stratified according to stage of fibrosis (622 with noncirrhotic fibrosis and 428 with cirrhosis), were seen at 3-month intervals and underwent liver biopsy at 1.5 and 3.5 years after randomization. The primary end point was progression of liver disease, as indicated by death, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic decompensation, or, for those with bridging fibrosis at baseline, an increase in the Ishak fibrosis score of 2 or more points.
                We randomly assigned the patients to receive peginterferon (517 patients) or no therapy (533 patients) for 3.5 years. The level of serum aminotransferases, the level of serum hepatitis C virus RNA, and histologic necroinflammatory scores all decreased significantly (P<0.001) with treatment, but there was no significant difference between the groups in the rate of any primary outcome (34.1% in the treatment group and 33.8% in the control group; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.27; P=0.90). The percentage of patients with at least one serious adverse event was 38.6% in the treatment group and 31.8% in the control group (P=0.07).
                Long-term therapy with peginterferon did not reduce the rate of disease progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis, with or without cirrhosis, who had not had a response to initial treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00006164.)
                2008 Massachusetts Medical Society Sustained response to interferon treatment for chronic hepatitis C is unsatisfactory. This study examined whether combining interferon alfa with ribavirin induces a better sustained efficacy than interferon alone in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.
                Sixty noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C were randomly assigned to three groups. Group 1 received 1200 mg oral ribavirin daily plus 3 million units of recombinant interferon alfa 2a thrice weekly for 24 weeks, group 2 received the same dose of interferon alfa 2a alone for 24 weeks, and group 3 received no treatment. The patients were then followed up for an additional 96 weeks.
                At the end of treatment, a complete response (normal serum alanine aminotransferase level and undetectable serum hepatitis C virus RNA) was achieved in 16 of the 21 patients in group 1 (76%), as compared with 6 of 19 in group 2 (32%) and none in group 3. At 96 weeks after the end of treatment, patients in group 1 sustained a higher complete response rate than patients in group 2 (43% vs. 6%).
                Combined treatment with ribavirin and interferon alfa 2a for 24 weeks is more effective than interferon alfa 2a alone for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. The biochemical and virological responses were sustained in about one half of the treated patients for at least 2 years after cessation of the therapy. Interferon a with ribavirin combination therapy is effective but still unsatisfactory in the treatment of patients with interferon-relapsed chronic hepatitis C.
                To compare, in a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study, high-dose interferon-alpha2b with or without ribavirin in the treatment for interferon-relapsers.
                A total of 52 patients with interferon-relapsed chronic hepatitis C were randomly assigned to receive 24-week treatment with interferon-alpha2b (6 MU three times per week) combined with either ribavirin (1,000 to 1,200 mg per day) or a matched placebo and then followed for an additional 24 weeks.
                Hepatitis C virus RNA was detected by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. For determining viral concentration, the commercial bDNA Quantiplex hepatitis C virus-RNA 2.0 assay was used. Genotyping was performed by reverse hybridization assay
                At the end of treatment, no detectable hepatitis C virus RNA levels were observed in 92% (24/26) of patients on interferon alpha2b/ribavirin and 81% (21/26) of patients on interferon alpha2b/placebo. At the end of the follow-up, a higher sustained virological response rate was seen in patients treated with interferon alpha2b/ribavirin than those treated with interferon alpha2b/placebo (69% vs 23%, p < 0.001). Patients with either initially high levels of viral concentration or with genotype 1 responded poorly. Patients who received interferon-alpha2b/ribavirin treatment and in whom no hepatitis C virus RNA was detected at 4th week after treatment had 90% chance to achieve sustained virological response.
                High-dose interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin treatment is highly effective in interferon-relapsed patients. Interferon-alpha plus ribavirin seem to be more efficacious than interferon monotherapy in chronic hepatitis C. In a multicenter randomized trial, we evaluated the efficacy of this association for interferon-alpha resistant chronic hepatitis C.
                Fifty patients who were non-responders to recombinant or lymphoblastoid interferon-alpha were randomized to receive either ribavirin (800 mg/day) plus leucocytic interferon-alpha (3 mega units thrice weekly) or the same dose of interferon-alpha alone, for 6 months. Effects of therapy were evaluated by serum aminotransferase and hepatitis C virus RNA levels and control liver biopsies.
                At the end of treatment, aminotransferase levels become normal in 9/26 patients receiving combination therapy (35% [confidence interval, 16% to 53%]) and in 2/24 receiving interferon-alpha alone (8% [confidence interval, -3% to 19%]) (p = 0.03). Aminotransferase normalization was never associated with hepatitis C virus RNA clearance. All patients with normal aminotransferase relapsed after discontinuation of therapy. At the end of treatment, mean hepatitis C virus RNA levels significantly decreased only in the group receiving combination therapy, but returned to pretreatment values 6 months thereafter. No histological improvement was observed in either group.
                There is no indication for treatment with interferon-alpha at the dose of 3 mega units thrice weekly plus 800 mg/day of ribavirin for 6 months in chronic hepatitis C resistant to interferon-alpha. Interferon-alpha treatment of chronic hepatitis C is beneficial in only 20-30% of patients. This study evaluates if combination therapy with Interferon-alfa plus ribavirin is effective in inducing a response in patients who did not respond to, or relapsed after, a standard Interferon-alfa treatment.
                A total of 88 patients, 49 non-responders and 39 relapsers to previous Interferon-alfa therapy, were randomized to receive either natural Interferon-alfa (6 MU t.i.w.) plus ribavirin (1000 mg/daily) or natural Interferon-alfa alone (6 MU t.i.w.) for 6 months. All were followed for 12 months after stopping therapy. Serum aminotransferase levels were assessed monthly and HCV RNA was evaluated by RT-PCR (Amplicor, Roche) at end of therapy and the end of follow-up.
                After treatment, a higher response rate defined as return to normal of aminotransferases and absence of serum HCV RNA was observed among patients treated with Interferon-alfa-ribavirin: 4/28 (14%) vs 1/21 (5%) non-responder patients and 9/19 (47%) vs 5/20 (25%) in the relapsers group. At the end of follow-up, a sustained response was found only in the combination treatment group: 4% and 32% in non-responder and relapser patients, respectively.
                Our results suggest that retreatment with natural Interferon-alfa plus ribavirin is more effective than Interferon-alfa alone in increasing the response rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C who relapse after a previous standard IFN treatment whereas it is less effective in non-responder patients. Interferon and ribavirin combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C induces a low response rate in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients. To assess the impact of intensification of interferon administration and of the addition of amantadine on the efficacy and safety of standard anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in HIV-infected patients.
                Multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomized, phase III clinical trial. Eighty co-infected patients were randomized to receive ribavirin 800-1,000 mg/day in combination with, group A: interferon alpha 2a 3MIU thrice weekly; group B: IFN alpha 2a 3MIU daily, plus amantadine 200 mg/day; treatment duration was 24-48 weeks according to HCV genotype.
                Forty-one patients were randomized in group A and 39 in group B. Intention-to-treat analysis showed a sustained virological response, defined as HCV-RNA negativization, 6 months after stopping treatment in 22% of patients from group A and 13% from group B (P>0.05). The lack of a 2-log drop in HCV-RNA levels after 12 weeks of treatment showed a 100% predictive value of lack of sustained response.
                Amantadine addition and interferon intensification do not improve the low efficacy of combination of interferon alfa plus ribavirin in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. Patients with no early virologic response did not have any probability of sustained response. Efficacy and safety of interferon induction therapy alone or in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine were evaluated in chronic hepatitis C patients who were nonresponders to primary antiviral treatment.
                The study was designed to have 225 HCV nonresponder patients, but at an interim analysis the response rate difference between groups was lower than expected and the enrollment was stopped when 75 patients had been randomized to receive interferon-alpha2a (group A, n = 26), interferon-alpha2a plus 15 mg/kg per day of ribavirin (group B, n = 24), or interferon-alpha2a plus ribavirin plus 200 mg/day of amantadine hydrochloride (group C, n = 25). Treatment duration was 48 weeks. The dose of interferon was 6 MU/day for 4 weeks followed by 3 MU/day for the remaining 44 weeks.
                On intention-to-treat, the sustained virological response at 24 weeks of follow-up was 11.5% in group A, 12.5% in group B, and 12% in group C. Therapy was discontinued because of adverse effects in three patients in group A (11.5%), three in group B (12.5%), and two in group C (8%).
                Nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C may achieve a sustained virological response rate of approximately 12% if retreated with interferon induction treatment followed by administration of a daily dose. The addition of ribavirin or amantadine did not seem to improve the response rates. In the patients with chronic hepatitis C, the addition of ribavirin to interferon (IFN)-alpha significantly increases the virologic responses. Our aim was to assess the antiviral action of ribavirin on hepatitis C virus (HCV) as a function of ribavirin pharmacokinetics and to evaluate the influence of this antiviral effect on IFN-alpha efficacy.
                Forty-five patients with chronic hepatitis C (genotype 1b) received various schedules of IFN-alpha and/or ribavirin administration. Frequent blood sampling was performed for HCV RNA kinetics and ribavirin pharmacokinetics assessment.
                Ribavirin monotherapy induced a significant, moderate, early, and transient viral load decrease in approximately half of the patients. The occurrence of this effect was associated with longer ribavirin clearance half-lives and higher serum ribavirin concentrations. Ribavirin antiviral effect partly reduced the rebound preceding the second IFN-alpha injection in patients receiving standard IFN-alpha 3 times per week plus ribavirin. The magnitude of the rebound was inversely related to ribavirin concentrations. These patients subsequently experienced a slow, but significant, second slope of viral decrease and cleared HCV RNA. The addition of ribavirin to daily IFN-alpha monotherapy did not have any impact on the second phase of viral decline.
                Ribavirin exerts a significant, moderate, and transient antiviral effect in a significant proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The antiviral effect of ribavirin correlates with ribavirin pharmacokinetics and is partly responsible for the improved efficacy of the combination of standard IFN-alpha and ribavirin compared with IFN-alpha monotherapy by increasing the incidence of the initial response. We conducted a three-arm, randomized trial in 96 patients with chronic hepatitis C who did not respond to interferon alfa to compare treatments. Group 1 (33 patients) received ribavirin alone (1,000 mg/daily for 6 months) followed by interferon alfa n-3 alone (3 MU thrice weekly for 6 months); group 2 (33 patients) received ribavirin plus interferon alfa n-3 for 6 months at the above doses; and group 3 (30 patients) received interferon alfa n-3 alone (3 MU thrice weekly for 6 months). At the end of treatment, 3 patients (10%) in group 1, 13 (41%) in group 2, and 5 (17%) in group 3 had normal alanine transaminase (ALT) levels (group 2 vs. groups 1 and 3, P = .008). After 6 months of follow-up, only 4 patients (12.5%) in group 2 still had normal ALT values (P = .03). At the end of therapy, hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA was no longer detectable by polymerase chain reaction in 4 (13%), 9 (27%), and 2 (7%) patients, respectively, in groups 1, 2, and 3 (P = NS). Six months posttherapy, only 5 (15%) patients in group 2 were still HCV RNA negative (P = .02). At the time of follow-up liver biopsy, performed 6 months after the end of treatment, a significant improvement of the necroinflammatory scores was observed among group 2 patients (P = .01) but not in the other two groups. Side effects reflected the profile of each drug as monotherapy; mild hemolytic anemia was the most frequent side effect caused by ribavirin. In conclusion, concomitant administration of ribavirin and interferon alfa n-3 was significantly superior to the sequential schedule or interferon alfa n-3 monotherapy in inducing a sustained response in patients with chronic hepatitis C who had not responded to interferon alone. However, combination therapy at the dose and duration adopted in this study is capable of modifying the natural course of the disease in only a minority of these patients. Evidence based medicine depends on unbiased selection of completed randomized controlled trials. For completeness it is important to publish all trials. This report describes the first large randomised controlled trial where combination therapy was compared to placebo therapy and to ribavirin monotherapy, which has not been published until now.
                One hundred and twenty one patients with chronic hepatitis C and elevated transaminases who did not respond to previous treatment with standard interferon monotherapy, were included from 16 centers in Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg between 1992 and 1996. Patient poor-response characteristics were: genotype 1 (69%), HCV RNA above 2 x 10(6) copies/ml (55%) and cirrhosis (38%). Patients were randomized to 6 months combination therapy with interferon alpha-2b (3 MU tiw) and ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day), 6 months ribavirin monotherapy (1000-1200 mg/day) or 6 months ribavirin placebo. The study was double blinded for the ribavirin/placebo component. One patient did not fit the entry criteria, and 3 did not start. All 117 patients who received at least one dose of treatment were included in the intention to treat analysis.
                At the end of treatment, HCV RNA was undetectable in 35% of patients on combination therapy and in none of the patients treated with ribavirin monotherapy or placebo. The sustained virological response rate at 6 months after therapy was 15% for patients treated with interferon and ribavirin. During the 6 months treatment period 13% of patients on interferon ribavirin combination therapy, 13% of patients on ribavirin monotherapy and 11% of patients on placebo withdrew due to side effects or noncompliance. At 24 weeks of treatment the mean Hb level was 85% of the baseline value, which means a mean decrease from 9.1 mmol/l to 7.8 mmol/l. The Hb levels at the end of treatment were not significantly different from patients treated with ribavirin monotherapy (p = 0.76). End of treatment WBC was significantly lower in patients treated with combination therapy, compared to ribavirin (p < 0.01) as well as for patients treated with ribavirin monotherapy compared to placebo (p < 0.01).
                This belated report on the only placebo controlled study of interferon ribavirin combination therapy in non responders to standard doses of interferon monotherapy documents the effectiveness, be it limited, of this approach as well as the dynamics of the effects on blood counts. To study the effects of monotherapy with leucocyte interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) versus IFNalpha + ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C who were nonresponders to previous courses of recombinant or lymphoblastoid IFNalpha.
                This was a nonblind randomised study of outpatients at 3 centres in Palermo, Sicily, Italy.
                We recruited 72 patients (48 males, 24 females), mean age 48.8 +/- 6.6 years (range 31 to 63 years), with biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis C, predominantly genotype 1b.
                24 patients (group A) received IFNalpha 6MU 3 times weekly for 6 months, and 48 patients (group B) received IFNalpha 6MU 3 times weekly + ribavirin 1200 mg/day for 6 months. ALT levels and adverse effects were monitored monthly, and hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels were measured at study entry, at the end of treatment and after a 6-month follow-up.
                At baseline all patients were HCV-RNA positive and had ALT levels greater than twice normal. Mean post-treatment serum HCV-RNA levels were below baseline in group A, but the virus was eradicated in only 1 patient; 6 patients had normalised serum ALT levels. In group B at end of treatment, 12 patients were negative for HCV-RNA and serum ALT levels were normal in 18. At follow-up, all group A patients had elevated ALT levels and positive HCV-RNA. In group B, 3 patients were still negative for HCV-RNA and 4 had normal ALT. In 4 patients in group B, therapy was suspended because of anaemia, depression and decrease in neutrophil count; a flu-like syndrome was recorded with no frequency difference between groups.
                These results suggest that patients with chronic hepatitis C unresponsive to IFNalpha monotherapy could benefit from combination therapy with IFNalpha + ribavirin. Preliminary results from combination therapy with interferon-alpha and ribavirin (IFN/Rib) in patients with chronic hepatitis C have been promising, with up to 50% sustained hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA response. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a sustained HCV RNA response could be obtained with combination therapy in patients who were non-responders or relapsers after IFN treatment.
                In a multicenter study we randomized 53 HCV RNA-positive patients into 2 treatment groups. They all had biopsy-confirmed chronic hepatitis C, and all were recruited from a previous IFN study: 26 were previous non-responders and 27 responders with relapse. Group A received interferon-alpha2a, 4.5 MIU thrice weekly for 6 months, and group B received ribavirin, 1000-1200 mg/day, in combination with the same dose of interferon-alpha2a for 6 months. Median Knodell index was 5.0 in both groups. Genotype 1 was found in 24 (45%), type 2 in 3 (6%), and type 3 in 26 (49%).
                Sustained clearance of HCV viremia 6 months after interferon-alpha2a treatment stop was obtained in 12 of 53 patients (23%): 6 of 27 in the IFN group (22%) and 6 of 26 (23%) in the IFN/Rib group (NS). Nine of 27 (33%) former responders with relapse, compared with 3 of 26 (12%) non-responders, obtained a sustained HCV RNA response (P = 0.054). In previous relapse patients sustained loss of viremia was more frequent in genotype 3 (50%) than in genotype 1 (11%) patients (P = 0.022).
                In a group of previous IFN-alpha2a-treated chronic HCV patients we obtained a similar sustained clearance of viremia when retreated either with IFN-alpha2a alone or with a combination of IFN-alpha2a and ribavirin for 6 months. Previous relapse patients with HCV genotype 3 obtained sustained loss of viremia significantly more often (50%) than type-patients (11%). Previous IFN responders with relapse responded better than previous non-responders. To examine the effects of interferon (IFN) therapy on clinical, biochemical, and histological features in patients with compensated hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis, we have conducted a randomized, controlled trial of IFN therapy versus observation. Eight centers included a total of 99 patients with biopsy-proven cirrhosis. IFN-alpha2b, 3 million units three times per week, or no antiviral therapy was given for 48 weeks. Twenty-three patients dropped out. End-of-treatment biochemical response was not observed in any of the 39 controls but was observed in 6 of the 47 treated patients (P <.02); sustained biochemical response was obtained in only 2 treated patients. Controls and treated patients did not significantly differ with regard to the changes in serum level of albumin, bilirubin, alpha-fetoprotein, in plasma prothrombin, in histological activity, or liver collagen content. During trial or follow-up (160 +/- 57 weeks), hepatocellular carcinoma developed in 9 controls and 5 treated patients (NS); decompensation of cirrhosis occurred in 5 controls and 7 treated patients. Seven controls and 10 treated patients died. In conclusion, in patients with compensated HCV-related cirrhosis, a 48-week course of IFN therapy is safe and is able to induce end-of-treatment biochemical response in a significant proportion of patients. However, a 48-week course of IFN therapy usually fails to achieve sustained response and, within the limit of this study, did not significantly improve the 3-year outcome. Therefore, a longer course of IFN therapy or combination therapy with ribavirin should be evaluated in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether pharmacokinetic interactions occurred between interferon alpha-2b (IFN) and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C infections. Additionally this study assessed the single and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of ribavirin and IFN, and compared the safety, tolerability and antiviral pharmacodynamics of IFN plus ribavirin compared with either drug alone.
                In this open label parallel group study, patients with chronic hepatitis C were randomized to receive IFN 3 million IU thrice weekly s.c. alone, ribavirin 600 mg twice daily p.o. alone or both drugs in combination over 6 weeks. Single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics and indices of antiviral pharmacodynamics were assessed during weeks 1 and 6, along with safety assessments during the study.
                The range of mean ribavirin terminal phase half-lives after single doses was 44-49 h. Comparison of week 1 and week 6 AUC(0,12h) values showed accumulation in plasma of approximately 6-fold. The range of mean washout half-lives after week 6 was 274-298 h, reflecting release of ribavirin from deep compartment stores. The range of single and multiple dose IFN terminal phase half-lives was 5-7 h. IFN demonstrated an increase in bioavailability (approximately 2-fold) upon multiple dose administration. Ribavirin and IFN pharmacokinetic parameters for combined ribavirin and IFN were similar to those during monotherapy with either compound, although the power of this study to detect differences was low. Serum HCV-RNA titers and ALT concentrations were reduced by IFN alone, ribavirin alone reduced ALT concentrations only, and combined IFN plus ribavirin produced numerically greater falls in both measurements than either treatment alone. Serum concentrations of neopterin and activity of 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase (2'5'-OAS) were increased by IFN alone and in combination with ribavirin, whereas serum 2'5'-OAS activity was decreased and neopterin concentrations unaltered by ribavirin monotherapy. IFN and ribavirin monotherapy produced characteristic changes in safety laboratory tests (IFN--reductions in white cells, neutrophils and platelets; ribavirin--reduced haemoglobin) and characteristic adverse event profiles (IFN--headache, flu-like symptoms, fatigue, anorexia, nausea, myalgia, and insomnia; ribavirin--headache, fatigue, myalgia, and pruritus). There was no additive effect of combination therapy on safety laboratory tests or reported adverse events. All changes were fully reversible upon treatment cessation.
                There was no evidence of pharmacokinetic interactions between IFN and ribavirin in this study. There were numerical trends indicating that the combination of IFN and ribavirin reduced titers of HCV-RNA to a greater extent than did either treatment alone, and the safety profile of combination therapy was similar to those of both monotherapy treatments. The efficacy and safety of peginterferon alpha-2a (40 KD) (peg-IFNalpha-2a) plus ribavirin has not been reported for Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to evaluate this combination in treatment-naïve patients and in non-responders or relapsers to interferon monotherapy.
                Overall, 201 treatment-naïve patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype-1b were randomly assigned to 180 microg peg-IFNalpha-2a once-weekly plus ribavirin 600-1000 mg/day or peg-IFNalpha-2a plus placebo for 48 weeks. Additionally, peg-IFNalpha-2a plus ribavirin was administered for 48 weeks to 100 non-responders or relapsers (85% genotype-1) to previous interferon monotherapy.
                A sustained virological response (SVR) was attained among significantly more treatment-naïve patients receiving combination therapy than monotherapy (61% vs 26%, P < 0.001). For patients with high baseline HCV RNA, the SVR rate was 59% with peg-IFNalpha-2a plus ribavirin versus 24% with peg-IFNalpha-2a monotherapy. Among non-responders or relapsers to previous interferon monotherapy, 54% attained an SVR. Adverse events were generally mild, and discontinuations rates due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were low.
                In Japanese patients, peg-IFNalpha-2a plus ribavirin provided significant improvement in SVR rates compared with peg-IFNalpha-2a alone in treatment-naïve patients, and was effective as re-treatment for non-responders or relapsers to previous treatment with interferon monotherapy. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly prevalent and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality among persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We compared the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alfa-2a (peginterferon alfa-2a) plus either ribavirin or placebo with those of interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic HCV infection in patients who were also infected with HIV.
                A total of 868 persons who were infected with both HIV and HCV and who had not previously been treated with interferon or ribavirin were randomly assigned to receive one of three regimens: peginterferon alfa-2a (180 microg per week) plus ribavirin (800 mg per day), peginterferon alfa-2a plus placebo, or interferon alfa-2a (3 million IU three times a week) plus ribavirin. Patients were treated for 48 weeks and followed for an additional 24 weeks. The primary end point was a sustained virologic response (defined as a serum HCV RNA level below 50 IU per milliliter at the end of follow-up, at week 72).
                The overall rate of sustained virologic response was significantly higher among the recipients of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin than among those assigned to interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin (40 percent vs. 12 percent, P<0.001), or peginterferon alfa-2a plus placebo (40 percent vs. 20 percent, P<0.001). Among patients infected with HCV genotype 1, the rates of sustained virologic response were 29 percent with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin, 14 percent with peginterferon alfa-2a plus placebo, and 7 percent with interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin. The corresponding rates among patients infected with HCV genotype 2 or 3 were 62 percent, 36 percent, and 20 percent. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more common among patients treated with regimens that contained peginterferon alfa-2a, and anemia was more common among patients treated with regimens containing ribavirin.
                Among patients infected with both HIV and HCV, the combination of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin was significantly more effective than either interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin or peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy.
                Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society Reports by hepatologists indicated that anti-HCV antibodies might be detected in 71% to 84% of cases of post-transfusion hepatitis and in up to 50% of cases of sporadic non-A non-B hepatitis. Anti-HCV antibodies were detected in 0.05-1% of blood donors with normal alanine transaminase (ALT) levels and negative anti-HBc screening. Anti-HCV antibodies were found in 67% of patients with a history of intravenous drug abuse or autoimmune hepatitis, and in 10-30% of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. This indicated that hepatitis C virus was a major cause of the acute and chronic hepatitis throughout the world.
                This was a multicenteric, international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. After the eight-week screening period, patients were randomized to receive daily ribavirin 1200 mg or placebo, during the 48-week treatment period. Follow-up observations were performed during a 16 week post-treatment period. Up to 80 male and female outpatients with mild to moderate chronic active hepatitis C virus infection were enrolled in this study.
                During the treatment period ALT values were significantly lower in the ribavirin group. Neither in the ribavirin group, nor in the placebo group significant statistical differences of the HCV RNA values were found. Significantly lower portal inflammation was noticed in ribavirin group after the treatment. Analysis of laboratory data demonstrated that ribavirin therapy was associated with mild to moderate reversible anemia. Investigator's evaluation of the effect of the therapy on patient's well being showed statistically significant differences in the benefit of the ribavirin group.
                In this study ribavirin was more effective than placebo in reducing ALT levels during the treatment period of the applied therapy in patients with chronic active hepatitis C. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients is a growing concern. Most data on the virologic efficacy and safety of the combination of peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin in coinfected patients come from uncontrolled studies.
                To study the safety and efficacy of peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin vs standard interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in HIV-HCV coinfected patients.
                A multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label trial. Patients were enrolled from February 2000 to February 2002 and followed up for 72 weeks.
                Four hundred twelve HIV-HCV coinfected patients with detectable serum HCV-RNA, abnormal liver histology, a CD4 cell count of at least 200 x 10(6)/L, and stable plasma HIV-RNA.
                Treatment with ribavirin 400 mg twice a day, orally, plus either peginterferon alfa-2b (1.5 microg/kg subcutaneous injection once a week) or standard interferon alfa-2b (3 million units of subcutaneous injection 3 times a week) for 48 weeks.
                Sustained virologic response, defined by undetectable serum HCV-RNA at week 72.
                More patients had sustained virologic responses in the peginterferon group than in the standard interferon group (27% vs 20%, P = .047). This difference between the treatments was found in patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection (17% for peginterferon vs 6% for standard interferon, P = .006) but was not found in patients with HCV genotype 2, 3, or 5 (44% for peginterferon vs 43% for standard interferon, P = .88). Together, a decline in HCV-RNA of less than 2 log10 from baseline and detectable serum HCV-RNA at week 12 predicted 99% of treatment failures. Histologic activity diminished and fibrosis stabilized in virologic responders. The 2 regimens showed similar tolerability although dose modifications for clinical and biological events were more frequent with peginterferon. Eleven cases of pancreatitis or symptomatic hyperlactatemia were observed, all in patients receiving didanosine-containing antiretroviral regimens.
                In combination with ribavirin, treatment with peginterferon alfa-2b is more effective than standard interferon alfa-2b for HCV infection in HIV-infected patients. Current therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIV co-infected patients have a low success rate and are poorly tolerated. We have evaluated the efficacy and safety of interferon alfa-2b (IFN) + ribavirin (RBV) versus pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PEG-INF) + RBV.
                Randomized, single-centre, open-label clinical trial including patients with: detectable HCV-RNA, alanine aminotransferase > 1.5-fold upper limit of normal, abnormal liver histology, CD4 cell count > 250 x 10/l and HIV RNA < 10 000 copies/ml. Patients were assigned to INF (3 x 10 units three times/week) or PEG-IFN (100-150 microg/week) plus RBV (800-1200 mg/day). Duration of treatment was 48 weeks (only 24 weeks for HCV genotypes 2 or 3 and baseline HCV RNA < 800 000 IU/ml). The primary endpoint was a sustained virological response (SVR).
                Ninety-five patients were randomized (43 INF + RBV, 52 PEG-INF + RBV), 68% males, 82% injecting drug users; 63% genotypes 1 or 4 and 36% genotypes 2 or 3; 62% fibrosis index grade >/=2 and 30% bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis. SVR was significantly higher in the PEG-INF + RBV arm, 44% versus 21% (intent to treat; P = 0.017). Among patients with genotypes 1 or 4, SVR were 38% versus 7% (P = 0.007) and 53% versus 47% (P = 0.730) for genotypes 2 or 3. CD4 cell count but not its percentage dropped in both arms and HIV RNA viral load did not change from baseline. Side effects were very frequent in both arms leading to treatment discontinuation in 14 patients without statistical differences between arms (P = 0.565).
                PEG-INF + RBV was significantly more effective than INF + RBV for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV co-infected patients, mainly of genotype 1 or 4. The optimal treatment for hepatitis C patients unresponsive to interferon is unclear. High-dose induction interferon may enhance early viral clearance, whilst ribavirin reduces relapse; in combination, they may improve sustained virological response rates.
                To compare the efficacy and safety of re-treatment with interferon induction, with or without ribavirin, in interferon non-responders.
                We randomized 218 biochemical interferon non-responders to 10 MU interferon alpha 2b daily for 4 weeks, followed by 5 MU thrice weekly for 48 weeks plus ribavirin (II + R), or to the same interferon regimen plus placebo (II + P). All patients were viraemic at entry.
                The sustained virological response in the II + R group was 39%[95% confidence interval (CI), 30-48%], compared with 16% (95% CI, 9-23%) in the II + P group (P < 0.002). The study drug was discontinued for intolerable symptoms during induction in 9% of the II + R group and in 5% of the II + P group. By logistic regression, a sustained virological response was more likely following II + R treatment (odds ratio, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.1-9.7) and less likely in patients with genotype 1 or 4 (odds ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07-0.36).
                High-dose induction interferon plus ribavirin is well tolerated and effective for patients unresponsive to interferon alone. Only 15-20% of patients with chronic hepatitis C achieve a sustained virological response with interferon therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of interferon alpha2b in combination with oral ribavirin with interferon alone, for treatment of chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV).
                832 patients aged 18 years or more with chronic HCV who had not been treated with interferon or ribavirin, were enrolled and randomly allocated one of three regimens: 3 mega units (MU) interferon alpha2b three times a week plus 1000-1200 mg ribavirin per day for 48 weeks; 3 MU interferon alpha2b three times a week plus 1000-1200 mg ribavirin per day for 24 weeks; or 3 MU interferon alpha2b three times a week and placebo for 48 weeks. All patients were assessed for safety, tolerance, and efficacy at the end of weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8, and every 4 weeks during treatment. After treatment was completed patients were followed up on weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24. The primary endpoint was loss of detectable HCV-RNA (serum HCV-RNA <100 copies/mL) at week 24 after treatment.
                Sustained virological response at 24 weeks after treatment, was found in 119 (43%) of the 277 patients treated for 48 weeks with the combination regimen, 97 (35%) of the 277 patients treated for 24 weeks with the combination regimen (p=O.055), and 53 (19%) of the 278 patients treated for 48 weeks with interferon alone (p<0.001 vs both combination regimens, intention-to-treat analysis). Logistic regression identified five independent factors significantly associated with response: genotype 2 or 3, viral load less than 2 million copies/mL, age 40 years or less, minimal fibrosis stage, and female sex. Among patients with fewer than three of these factors the odds ratio of sustained response was 2.6 (95% Cl 1.4-4.8; p=0.002) for the 48 week combination regimen compared with 24 weeks of the combination regimen. Discontinuation of therapy for adverse events was more frequent with combination (19%) and monotherapy (13%) given for 48 weeks than combination therapy given for 24 weeks (8%).
                An interferon alpha2b plus ribavirin combination is more effective than 48 weeks of interferon alpha2b monotherapy and has an acceptable safety profile. Patients with few favourable factors benefit more from extending the duration of combination therapy to 48 weeks. R1626, a prodrug of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA polymerase inhibitor R1479, showed time-dependent and dose-dependent reduction of HCV RNA levels in a previous study. The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of R1626 administered for 4 weeks in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a +/- ribavirin in HCV genotype 1-infected treatment-naive patients. Patients were randomized to: DUAL 1500 (1500 mg R1626 twice daily [bid] + peginterferon alfa-2a; n = 21); DUAL 3000 (3000 mg R1626 bid + peginterferon alfa-2a; n = 32); TRIPLE 1500 (1500 mg R1626 bid + peginterferon alfa-2a + ribavirin; n = 31); or standard of care (SOC) (peginterferon alfa-2a + ribavirin; n = 20). At 4 weeks HCV RNA was undetectable (<15 IU/mL) in 29%, 69%, and 74% of patients in the DUAL 1500, DUAL 3000, and TRIPLE 1500 arms, respectively, compared with 5% of patients receiving SOC, with respective mean reductions in HCV RNA from baseline to week 4 of 3.6, 4.5, 5.2, and 2.4 log(10) IU/mL. Synergy was observed between R1626 and peginterferon alfa-2a and between R1626 and ribavirin. There was no evidence of development of viral resistance. Adverse events (AEs) were mainly mild or moderate; seven patients had nine serious AEs (including one patient with one serious AE in SOC). The incidence of Grade 4 neutropenia was 48%, 78%, 39%, and 10% in DUAL 1500, DUAL 3000, TRIPLE 1500, and SOC, respectively, and was the main reason for dose reductions. Conclusion: A synergistic antiviral effect was observed when R1626 was combined with peginterferon alfa-2a +/- ribavirin; up to 74% of patients had undetectable HCV RNA at week 4. Dosing of R1626 was limited by neutropenia; a study of different dosages of R1626 in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin is underway. The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of interferon-ribavirin combination therapy for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients who failed previous treatment with interferon monotherapy.
                A total of 140 patients with well-documented chronic HCV who failed to achieve a virological (if HCV-RNA was assessed) or biochemical response (if HCV-RNA was not assessed) to interferon monotherapy, 3 mU three times weekly (TIW) for 3-18 months, were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. Group A patients were treated with 5 mU interferon TIW for 6 months. Ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) was added in those patients HCV-RNA positive at month 3. Group B patients were treated with 3 mU interferon TIW plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) for 6 months. The dose of interferon was increased to 5 mU TIW in those patients HCV-RNA positive at month 3. Group C patients were treated with 5 mU interferon TIW plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) for 6 months. Serum ALT and HCV-RNA were monitored during and after treatment for a total of 15 months.
                Seventeen percent of patients in group A became HCV-RNA negative by treatment month 3. Adding ribavirin resulted in one additional patient becoming HCV-RNA negative. However, none of the patients in this group achieved sustained virological response. Twenty-six percent of patients in group B became HCV-RNA negative by treatment month 3. Increasing the dose of interferon from 3 to 5 mU TIW increased virological response to 30%. However, sustained virological response was observed in only 14%. Thirty percent of patients in group C became HCV-RNA negative, but sustained virological response was observed in only 12%. Sustained virological response was found to be significantly greater in patients with a nontype I HCV genotype (p < 0.002) and in patients who had a decline in HCV-RNA titer to a value < 100,000 copies/ml during their previous course of interferon monotherapy (p < 0.0001). None of the 12 sustained responders were African Americans (p < 0.013).
                Retreatment of nonresponders with interferon-ribavirin combination therapy results in limited benefit; only 13% of patients achieved sustained virological response. Response was extremely poor in African Americans and those with HCV genotype 1. Subjects with chronic hepatitis C who fail treatment with interferon-alpha are generally divided into two groups: "relapsers" who normalized serum aminotransferase activity and have undetectable viral RNA during treatment and "non-responders" who do not achieve these results. The aim of this study was to examine retreatment of such subjects.
                We studied 117 subjects with chronic hepatitis C who failed treatment with interferon-alpha, 87 of whom were "non-responders" and 30 "relapsers." Retreatment was with either interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks or with interferon-alpha-2b plus placebo for 24 weeks followed by 24 weeks of combined therapy.
                Sustained response rates, defined as undetectable viral RNA in serum 6 months after retreatment, were 53% in "relapsers" and 10% in "non-responders" (P < 0.005). There was no significant difference if ribavirin was given for 24 or 48 weeks. In "non-responders" infected with genotypes other than type 1, 42% achieved a sustained response compared to 5% infected with genotype 1 (P = 0.027; odds ratio 7.09).
                Treatment with interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin is effective in approximately 50% of "relapsers" and "non-responders" infected with non-type 1 genotypes of hepatitis C virus. This therapy is only marginally effective in "non-responders" infected with genotype 1a or 1b. To assess the efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in combination in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C who had either failed to respond to therapy with interferon alpha (nonresponders), or who had relapsed after interferon therapy (relapsers).
                Four hundred patients with chronic hepatitis C (200 nonresponders and 200 relapsers) were randomly assigned in equal numbers to receive either subcutaneous administration of recombinant interferon alpha-2b (3 million units three times per week) and ribavirin (1,000 to 1,200 mg/daily orally) or interferon alpha-2b alone (6 million units three times per week). Both ribavirin and interferon alpha-2b were given for 24 weeks. The patients were then followed for an additional 24 weeks.
                At the end of the treatment period, normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase levels and absence of hepatitis C virus RNA were seen in 21% of nonresponders and in 39% of relapsers who were treated with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin, compared with 5% of nonresponders (P = 0.001) and 9% of relapsers treated with interferon alpha-2b alone (P <0.001). At the end of follow-up, 14% of nonresponders and 30% of relapsers treated with the combination therapy had a sustained response, compared with 1% of nonresponders (P = 0.001) and 5% of relapsers treated with interferon alpha alone (P <0.001).
                A 24-week course of treatment with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin offers a chance of sustained response, whereas retreatment with interferon alpha-2b alone does not give satisfactory results. The role of long-term therapy in inducing prolonged remission remains to be explored. Recently, the combination treatment of recombinant alpha-interferon plus ribavirin has been proposed for chronic hepatitis C patients unresponsive to previous therapy with recombinant alpha-interferon alone.
                To determine the effectiveness of the combination therapy for the re-treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients unresponsive to previous interferon therapy. Immediate and long-term follow-up data are reported.
                A series of 100 patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to recombinant alpha-interferon 3 MU tiw, were randomly assigned to two groups of 50 patients each: Group A, treated with recombinant alpha-interferon therapy for an additional six months but at a double dosage (6 MU tiw) in association with ribavirin. Group B, same treatment as group A but without ribavirin. All patients responsive to therapy were then followed-up for at least 12 months. At the end of the treatment and at the end of the follow-up period, we distinguished between complete responses (return to normal of alanine aminotransferase with undetectable serum HCV-RNA] and biochemical responses (return to normal of alanine aminotransferase still with detectable viraemia).
                Side-effects were observed only in patients treated with recombinant alpha-interferon plus ribavirin: 12% discontinued the therapy due to haemolytic anaemia. In group A, the percentages of end-of-treatment complete response, end-of-treatment biochemical response, sustained complete response, and sustained biochemical response, were 38%, 20%, 8%, and 14%, respectively, whilst in group B, these percentages were 12%, 16%, 6%, and 16%, respectively.
                The results indicate that in patients with chronic hepatitis C unresponsive to previous recombinant alpha-interferon therapy, re-treatment with higher recombinant alpha-interferon doses, either alone or in combination with ribavirin, lead to mild long-term benefit. However, the satisfactory end of treatment complete response in group A suggests that a significant percentage of patients are sensitive to the combination therapy; and that a more aggressive therapeutic protocol in this selected subset of patients could result in a larger number of long-lasting responses leading, in turn, to a more favourable cost-effect ratio. A combination of interferon alpha and ribavirin has been suggested to reach a higher rate of sustained virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C than monotherapy. In this study we assessed the long-term efficacy of this combination therapy in the treatment of selected Italian naive chronic hepatitis C patients compared to interferon alpha monotherapy.
                We enrolled 428 naive patients who were randomly assigned to receive either recombinant interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin for 24 weeks or interferon alpha-2b alone for 48 weeks. The primary end-point of the study was the rate of sustained virological response. Serum HCV RNA levels were determined before treatment; during treatment at weeks 12 and 24 in the patients receiving the combination therapy; at weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 in the patients receiving monotherapy; and after therapy at weeks 12, 24 and 48 in the patients in both study groups.
                Sustained virological response was observed in 43% of the patients treated with combination therapy and in 14% of the patients treated with monotherapy. Logistic regression analysis showed that sustained response was associated with the combination therapy, with HCV genotype other than 1b, with an HCV viral load of 3x10(6) copies/ml or less, with an inflammation score of 7 or less, and with an estimated duration of disease of 10 years or less.
                A 24-week treatment course with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin offers a greater chance of sustained virological response compared to treatment with interferon alpha-2b alone for 48 weeks, and may be indicated as initial therapy in such patients. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is known to infect and replicate within peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), thereby enabling the direct evaluation of antiviral mechanisms by analyzing HCV dynamics in PBMC. To address potential molecular differences associated with distinct antiviral regimens, we studied HCV dynamics in both serum and PBMC in 44 patients with HCV genotype 1b and high viral load who were randomly assigned to the following 4 different treatment groups: 1) combination therapy with 6 MU daily of interferon alfa 2b (IFN-alpha2b) plus 800 mg of ribavirin; 2) monotherapy with 6 MU daily of IFN-alpha2b; 3) monotherapy with twice-daily intravenous administration with 3MU of IFN-beta; and 4) monotherapy with daily intravenous administration with 6 MU of IFN-beta. HCV-RNA levels were measured serially using highly sensitive real-time detection polymerase chain reaction (PCR). HCV dynamics in both the serum and PBMC showed a "biphasic" pattern. The exponential decay slopes of the second phase were significantly higher in the combination or twice-daily dosing regimen groups compared with groups 2 or 4 (0.10 +/- 0.08 vs. 0.02 +/- 0.09 or 0.16 +/- 0.09 vs. 0.02 +/- 0.04 day(-1); P <.05 or P <.0005, respectively). Moreover, the viral half-lives in the second phase were significantly shorter in these groups (73.2 +/- 42.5 vs. 240.1 +/- 120.7 or 56.0 +/- 44.6 vs. 361.6 +/- 293.5 hours; P <.05 or P <.05, respectively). Additionally, the slope of HCV decline in PBMC tended to be higher in the combination regimens, as compared with monotherapy. Taken together, our data on HCV dynamics provide molecular insight into utilization of combination or twice-daily dosing regimens to increase rates of sustained viral eradication of HCV. In chronic hepatitis C the schedule of interferon (IFN), 3 MU thrice weekly (tiw) plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/daily) needs further evaluation, as IFN dosages >3 MU achieve better responses.
                To compare the efficacy of 5 MU tiw of IFN with (96 patients) or without ribavirin (96 patients) for 12 months in naïve patients, to evaluate the effect of baseline features on the response to therapy, and to determine a reliable point in time during treatment to predict non-response.
                Sustained virologic response was 20.8% (95% CI 13-29) with IFN monotherapy and 54.2% (95% CI 44-64) with combination (P = 0.0001), the relapse rate 39.4% (95% CI 23-56) and 9% (95% CI 1-16) (P = 0.0007), and the combined rate of sustained biochemical and virologic response 22.7% (95% CI 14-31) and 60.5% (95% CI 50-71) (P = 0.0001), respectively. Patients given combination therapy were more likely to respond regardless of baseline features. Apart from genotype non-1, predictive factors for IFN monotherapy were ineffective in predicting response to combination therapy. Using logistic regression analysis, IFN-ribavirin was the strongest predictor of response (X2 = 21.3; P = 0.0001). Viral persistence at month 3 of therapy was a more accurate predictor than aminotransferase values for non-response to IFN monotherapy but not to combination therapy (positive predictive values of 98 and 82%, respectively).
                In this study, 5 MU of IFN combined with a standard dose of ribavirin has yielded the highest rate of sustained response reported to date. Further dose finding studies are warranted. Recently, in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are able to enhance the activity of interferon alpha.
                To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ketoprofen (a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) plus interferon alpha (group B) compared to interferon alpha plus ribavirin (group C) and interferon alpha alone (group A) in chronic hepatitis C non-responders after a 5-month course with interferon alpha.
                Without stopping interferon alpha, 49 patients were randomized to receive one of the three treatment regimens for 4 months.
                Three patients discontinued the therapy. One out of 16 patients in group A, 6/16 in group B and 5/14 in group C, alanine aminotransferase returned to normal at the end of the therapies (B vs A: p=0.04); serum hepatitis C virus-RNA became negative in 1 patient in group A and in 4 patients in both group B and group C. Six months after treatment, normal alanine transferase and negative hepatitis C virus-RNA were observed in 3 patients in group B and 2 in group C. In these patients, liver histology significantly improved.
                These results indicate that a certain number of non-responder patients to interferon alpha can benefit from a combination therapy of interferon alpha plus ketoprofen that is at least as effective as the combination interferon alpha plus ribavirin. The objectives of this study were to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PEG-Intron) plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C. A total of 72 patients (35 men/37 women, age range 20-68 years) with clinically compensated chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) were enrolled into this open-label, randomized, active controlled study. Patients received either PEG-Intron 0.35, 0.7, or 1.4 microg/kg subcutaneously weekly for 24 weeks alone, or in combination with ribavirin 600, 800, or 1,000 to 1,200 mg orally daily. Patients were evaluated during treatment and after a 24-week follow-up period for safety and efficacy. Detailed pharmacokinetic assessments were performed at weeks 1 and 4. PEG-Intron alone produced expected dose-related reductions in white cells, neutrophils and platelets. Addition of ribavirin reduced hemoglobin levels in a dose-related manner, did not further reduce PEG-Intron-induced decreases in neutrophil or white cell count, and increased platelet counts. Neutrophil function tests (C5a and FMLP migration, killing curves) were unaltered. Reported adverse events (flu-like symptoms, asthenia) were qualitatively similar in all dose groups. Anti-HCV activity, as measured by loss of detectable serum HCV RNA (i.e. <100 copies/mL) at the end of treatment (week 24) and after 24 weeks of follow-up (week 48) showed dose-response trends for PEG-Intron. At each PEG-Intron dose level, anti-HCV activity was higher in patients coadministered ribavirin than in patients treated with PEG-Intron monotherapy. There was no evidence of pharmacokinetic interactions with either drug. We conclude that the safety and tolerability of combined PEG-Intron/ribavirin and PEG-Intron alone were comparable. Combined PEG-Intron/ribavirin showed dose-related synergistic anti-HCV effects, which were numerically superior to those obtained with PEG-Intron monotherapy. Ribavirin is associated with haemolytic anaemia. Antioxidants have been reported to decrease severity of this anaemia.
                To determine effect of vitamin E supplementation on ribavirin-associated haemolysis in chronic hepatitis C treated with standard alpha-interferon and ribavirin.
                Fifty-one naive chronic hepatitis C patients were randomized to receive either alpha-interferon/ribavirin therapy (control) or therapy plus vitamin E 800 IU b.d. with 24-week follow-up. Alanine aminotransferase ALT, haemoglobin and reticulocyte percentage were monitored. Symptoms and health-related quality of life were also monitored at each visit.
                Forty-seven subjects were treated (27 vitamin E /20 controls). Thirteen withdrew because of adverse effects or non-compliance. Groups were similar in demographics, genotype and baseline lab indices. Comparison with baseline, treatment and follow-up values showed a significant haemoglobin and ALT reduction in both groups. There was no significant difference in haemoglobin and reticulocyte percentage between groups. Sustained viral response was not significantly different between vitamin E (11/18) and control (6/16) groups. Three patients required ribavirin dose-reduction in the vitamin E group compared with two controls. Health-related quality of life during and end-of-treatment was not different between groups.
                Vitamin E supplementation alone during standard alpha-interferon and ribavirin therapy does not appear to diminish ribavirin-associated haemolysis.
Compared with interferon alone, ribavirin plus interferon is more effective in clearing hepatitis C virus from the blood. Combination therapy may reduce liver-related morbidity and all-cause mortality, but we need more evidence. The number needed to treat to obtain a beneficial effect is considerable considering the increased risk of several severe adverse reactions and costs.