Levodopa or dopamine agonists, or deprenyl as initial treatment for Parkinson's disease. A randomized multicenter study. Pergolide versus levodopa monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease patients: The PELMOPET study. Chronic effects of dopaminergic replacement on cognitive function in Parkinson's disease: a two-year follow-up study of previously untreated patients. The long-acting dopamine receptor agonist cabergoline in early Parkinson's disease: final results of a 5-year, double-blind, levodopa-controlled study. Five-year follow-up of early lisuride and levodopa combination therapy versus levodopa monotherapy in de novo Parkinson's disease. The French Lisuride Study Group. Efficacy of combining levodopa with entacapone on quality of life and activities of daily living in patients experiencing wearing-off type fluctuations. Early institution of bromocriptine in Parkinson's disease inhibits the emergence of levodopa-associated motor side effects. Long-term results of the PRADO study. Efficacy and tolerability of entacapone in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with levodopa plus a dopamine agonist and experiencing wearing-off motor fluctuations. A randomized, double-blind, multicentre study. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of levodopa-carbidopa treatment for cocaine dependence: two double-blind, randomized, clinical trials. Ten-year follow-up of three different initial treatments in de-novo PD: a randomized trial. Pramipexole vs levodopa as initial treatment for Parkinson disease: a 4-year randomized controlled trial. A multicenter trial of ropinirole as adjunct treatment for Parkinson's disease. Ropinirole Study Group. Double-blind study of the activity and tolerability of cabergoline versus placebo in parkinsonians with motor fluctuations. CQA 206-291: a novel dopamine agonist in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Ropinirole in the treatment of levodopa-induced motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease. Entacapone enhances the response to levodopa in parkinsonian patients with motor fluctuations. Nomecomt Study Group. Cabergoline compared to levodopa in the treatment of patients with severe restless legs syndrome: results from a multi-center, randomized, active controlled trial. A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa. 056 Study Group. Investigation by Parkinson's Disease Research Group of United Kingdom into excess mortality seen with combined levodopa and selegiline treatment in patients with early, mild Parkinson's disease: further results of randomised trial and confidential inquiry. Efficacy, safety, and tolerance of the non-ergoline dopamine agonist pramipexole in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease: a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, multicentre study. A randomised, clinical study of the effect of low-dose dopamine on central and renal haemodynamics in infrarenal aortic surgery. Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibition with tolcapone reduces the "wearing off" phenomenon and levodopa requirements in fluctuating parkinsonian patients. Levodopa pharmacotherapy for cocaine dependence: choosing the optimal behavioral therapy platform. Amantadine as treatment for dyskinesias and motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease. Does combined levodopa and bromocriptine therapy in Parkinson's disease prevent late motor complications? Tolcapone improves motor function and reduces levodopa requirement in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Tolcapone Fluctuator Study Group I.
Objectives: levodopa improves the quality of life in parkinsonian patients, however long term response is compromised by the emergence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in previously untreated patients assigned to receive levodopa, a dopamine agonist or deprenyl.Thirty-five neurological departments in Italian hospitals participated in this randomized open trial. Patients with Parkinson's disease, who required the initiation of an effective antiparkinsonian treatment, were randomly assigned to receive levodopa, dopamine agonists or deprenyl. The end-points were motor dyskinesias and motor fluctuations occurring in a median follow-up period of about 3years.After a median follow-up of 34months, motor fluctuations and dyskinesias were less frequent in patients assigned to a dopamine agonist or deprenyl than in patients assigned to levodopa (relative risk [RR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.3-0.8, and RR=0.6, 95% CI 0.3-0.9, respectively), but dopamine agonists were less effective and less well tolerated than levodopa. The lower frequency of motor fluctuations in patients assigned to deprenyl was no longer statistically significant when prognostic predictors were considered in a multivariable analysis. Long-term mortality did not differ in the three arms of the study. Dopamine agonists and deprenyl can be considered as an alternative to levodopa for starting treatment in Parkinson's disease patients. However, on clinical grounds, only small advantages are expected over the traditional therapy initiation with levodopa. Dopamine agonists are used as initial treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) to reduce incidence and severity of motor complications. This paradigm is based on long-term studies, allowing "rescue" therapy with levodopa. The present strict monotherapy study (PELMOPET, the acronym for the pergolide-versus-L-dopa-monotherapy-and-positron-emission-tomography trial) evaluated the efficacy and safety of pergolide versus levodopa without levodopa "rescue" medication. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, 3-year trial compared pergolide monotherapy (n=148) with levodopa monotherapy (n=146) in dopamine-naive patients with early PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-2.5). Primary efficacy measures were clinical efficacy, severity and time to onset of motor complications, and disease progression. During the 3 years, severity of motor complications was significantly lower and time to onset of dyskinesia was significantly delayed in the group receiving pergolide (3.23 mg/day) compared with those receiving levodopa (504 mg/day). However, time to onset of motor complications was not longer in patients receiving pergolide after 3 years. Symptomatic relief (assessed by Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS], UPDRS II, and III, Clinical Global Impressions [CGI] severity, and CGI and Patient Global Impressions [PGI] improvement) was significantly greater in patients receiving levodopa. Adverse events led to discontinuation of therapy in 17.6% of pergolide patients and 9.6% of levodopa patients. This is the first study comparing strict monotherapy with a dopamine agonist versus levodopa in previously untreated early PD. In principle, both levodopa and a dopamine agonist such as pergolide seem to be suitable options as initial PD therapy. The choice remains with the treating physician based on the different efficacy and adverse event profiles.
                (c) 2005 Movement Disorder Society. The cognitive effects of dopaminergic treatment in Parkinson's disease (PD) are still controversial.
                To evaluate, in previously untreated patients with PD, whether chronic dopaminergic stimulation produces significant cognitive changes; whether they are sustained beyond the period of a few months; and whether the cognitive status of two motor-comparable groups is differently affected by levodopa and pergolide.
                Parallel, randomized open study with blind neuropsychologic evaluation of 20 consecutive de novo patients with PD before and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after monotherapy with levodopa (n = 10) or pergolide (n = 10; 6-month monotherapy; pergolide + levodopa thereafter).
                Both treatments were associated with a significant improvement in motor scores and in tests assessing learning and long-term verbal and visual memory, visuospatial abilities, and various frontal tasks. While improvement in motor scores persisted, improvement in activities of daily living and in semantic fluency, Luria's rhythm and motor and long-term memory tests was not sustained at the 24-month examination. Further, performance on attentional, short-term memory, and the Stroop tests did not change over the course of the study.
                Both treatments were associated with incomplete but long-lasting (18 mos) improvement in many cognitive tasks which declined thereafter, suggesting that dopaminergic replacement is not enough to compensate for all cognitive deficits of PD. Cabergoline is an ergoline derivative with a very long half-life that allows once-daily administration and the potential for more continuous stimulation of dopaminergic receptors than is possible with other dopamine receptor agonists (DAs). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the possible advantage resulting from a more sustained dopaminergic effect of cabergoline would translate into delayed onset of motor complications, compared with levodopa, in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease.
                This study was a double-blind, multicentre trial that compared cabergoline and levodopa as initial therapy for Parkinson's disease. A total of 419 levodopa-, DA- and selegiline-naive patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease were randomised to receive either cabergoline (n = 211) or levodopa (n = 209). Treatment was titrated to an optimal dose over a period of up to 24 weeks and then continued at this dose until the study endpoint (confirmed motor complications) or up to a maximum of 5 years. At years 1-5, the cabergoline group was receiving cabergoline at average daily doses ranging from 2.8-2.9 mg, with added levodopa at mean daily doses ranging from 322 mg at year 1 to 431 mg at year 5; over the same period, the levodopa group was receiving daily levodopa doses of 784 mg. Thus, patients in the cabergoline group received <50% levodopa than patients in the levodopa group.
                Motor complications were significantly delayed (p = 0.0175) and occurred less frequently in cabergoline-treated patients than in levodopa-treated patients (22.3% vs 33.7%). Cox model proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the relative risk of developing such complications was >50% lower (0.46; p < 0.001) in the cabergoline group compared with the levodopa group. In particular, development of dyskinesias was markedly delayed in the cabergoline group and occurred in 9.5% of patients compared with 21.2% in the levodopa group (p < 0.001). Among patients not requiring supplemental levodopa, the frequency of motor complications was three times higher with levodopa (15.5% of 110 patients) than with cabergoline (5.3% of 76 patients). Among patients who did need supplemental levodopa, motor complications were more frequent in the levodopa arm (54.1% of 98 patients) than in the cabergoline arm (31.9% of 135 patients). Consistent improvements relative to baseline in average Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) daily living activities and motor function sections, and in Clinical Global Impression severity of illness and physician- and patient- rated global improvement scores, were seen in both treatment groups, with maximal effects occurring within 2 years. However, levodopa treatment was associated with a significantly (p < 0.001) greater improvement in motor disability (as measured by the UPDRS motor score) over time, with mean values of 13.8 versus 12.9 in the cabergoline versus levodopa arm recorded at 1 year, 18.6 versus 17.2 at 3 years and 19.2 versus 16.3 at 5 years, respectively. While the overall frequency of adverse events was similar in the two groups, the cabergoline-treated group experienced marginally, but not significantly, higher frequencies of nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia and gastritis (37.4% vs 32.2% in the levodopa group) and of dizziness and postural hypotension (31.3% vs 24% in the levodopa group). Cabergoline-treated patients also experienced a significantly higher frequency of peripheral oedema (16.1% vs 3.4%, respectively; p < 0.0001). The cabergoline and levodopa groups had similar rates of sleepiness (17.5% vs 18.3%, respectively) and hallucinations (4.8% vs 4.4%, respectively); in an elderly population subset, hallucinations were reported in 7.1% and 6.5% of patients taking cabergoline and levodopa, respectively. Adverse events generally occurred more frequently in female patients (with the exception of dyskinesias, hyperkinesias and hallucinations, which occurred more frequently in men) and in the elderly.
                This study showed that, compared with levodopa, initial therapy with cabergoline in patients with Parkinson's disease is associated with a lower risk of response fluctuations at the cost of a marginally reduced symptomatic improvement and some tolerability disadvantages that are mostly limited to a significantly higher frequency of peripheral oedema. The value of an early initial coadministration of levodopa (L-dopa) and lisuride in Parkinson's disease was the main goal of the present study. Eighty-two patients with recently diagnosed idiopathic Parkinson's disease were randomized into two groups for treatment with L-dopa alone or L-dopa + lisuride. The trial was double-blinded for the first year and open for the following 4 years. Selegiline (10 mg/day b.i.d.) was added in both groups at the end of the first year. Outcome measures were evolution of L-dopa dosage and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores and subscores, and incidence of motor complications. The dropout rate was higher in the L-dopa group (63.4%) than in the combination group. Motor improvement was better (p < 0.01) in the L-dopa + lisuride group. Expected motor complications were rare, moderate and equivalent in the two groups despite a difference in L-dopa dosage (446.7 vs. 387.5 mg/day). Long-term follow-up demonstrated the L-dopa-sparing effect of lisuride (average 1 mg/day), the beneficial effect of early combination therapy on motor status and the paucity of motor complications in both groups.
                Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel To compare the efficacy of levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) plus entacapone with levodopa/DDCI plus placebo on measures of parkinsonian disability and health-related quality of life (QoL) in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing motor fluctuations.
                A double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IV study was performed in 270 PD patients randomized to receive either entacapone 200 mg or placebo with each dose of their current levodopa regimen. The primary variables were the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part II activities of daily living (ADL) and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ)-39 summary index. UPDRS parts I, III-VI, Global Assessment of Change, PDQ-39 subscores, and the Short-Form (SF)-36 and the European Quality of Life five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) were included as secondary variables.
                There was a significant improvement in ADL scores with levodopa/DDCI/entacapone compared with levodopa/DDCI/placebo at 5 and 13 weeks (-2.3 vs -0.7, respectively; P = 0.0001). However, no significant differences were observed between treatments using the PDQ-39 summary index. UPDRS part III (motor) scores significantly decreased in the levodopa/DDCI/entacapone group compared with the levodopa/DDCI/placebo group (-5.0 vs -2.9, respectively; P = 0.03). Similarly, the change in the investigators Global Assessment was significantly greater (P = 0.004) in the levodopa/DDCI/entacapone group. There were no significant differences between treatments for any of the PDQ-39 subscores, the SF-36 variables or the EQ-5D utility score.
                Levodopa combined with entacapone demonstrated good efficacy in terms of ADL, global function, motor performance and was well tolerated. However, this short-term study did not generate significant improvements in QoL.
                Blackwell Munksgaard 2004 Long-term levodopa treatment in Parkinson's disease is typically associated with "motor side effects" consisting in dyskinesias and/or fluctuations in motility referred to as the on-off phenomena. The main objective of this prospective, randomized, multi-centre study was to determine to what extent the development of such complications could be prevented by partial substitution of levodopa monotherapy (L-DOPA/benserazide) by bromocriptine in patients with early symptoms of the disease. The basic trial population included 674 newly diagnosed Parkinsonian patients that were randomly allocated to monotherapy with levodopa or a combination therapy based upon a nearly 40% replacement of levodopa by bromocriptine. The two target regimens had to be consistently maintained for 42 months. Parkinsonian symptoms were assessed by means of the Webster rating scale, the Hoehn and Yahr scale, and the Zung Self-Rating Depression scale. Motor side effects and adverse events were recorded at each regular clinic visit. Neurological symptoms improved and stabilized in a similar manner during treatment with both regimens throughout the study period. Motor side effects were observed in more patients on levodopa alone than on combination therapy (28.8 vs 20%; p = 0.008). According to Kaplan-Meier estimates the cumulative probability of experiencing motor side effects was 0.43 on monotherapy, compared to 0.28 on combination therapy, which was equal to a one third reduction of risk (p = 0.025). In regard to motor side effects, the degree of substitution of levodopa proved relevant: patients with > 50% substitution by bromocriptine exhibited half the risk observed in those with < 30% (p = 0.045). The overall burden of motor side effects, as reflected by a sum score based upon the relevance, the severity and the extent of motor dysfunction, was also significantly less on combination therapy (p = 0.046). In conclusion, partial substitution of levodopa by bromocriptine (> 30%) as first-line treatment of Parkinson's disease proves active in the prophylaxis of levodopa associated motor side effects. Early combination therapy therefore extends the period of optimal disease control. The efficacy and tolerability of entacapone was investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-month study of 162 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) treated with levodopa and a dopamine agonist and experiencing wearing-off motor fluctuations. Patients were randomized in a 3 : 2 ratio to entacapone 200 mg or placebo, administered with each dose of levodopa. Efficacy was judged on the improvement of "on" and "off" time while awake (Patient Diary and UPDRS part IV Item 39), Investigators' Global Assessment, the SF-36 Health Survey, and changes in levodopa dosages. Patients were monitored for adverse events, laboratory safety and vital signs throughout the study. Improvements in "on" time as assessed using patient diary data showed a trend in favour of entacapone, however these did not reach statistical significance. "Off" time while awake (UPDRS part IV Item 39) showed an improvement of at least one category in 36% of entacapone-treated patients, compared with 22% in the control group (p = 0.0038). The proportion of patients showing an improvement at the Investigators' Global Assessment was significantly higher (p = 0.0006) in the entacapone-treated group of patients. Also, the proportion of patients with a reduction in their daily levodopa dose was significantly higher (p = 0.02) in the entacapone group (28%) compared with placebo (13%). As expected, the most frequent adverse events were dopamine-mediated (dyskinesia: entacapone 31% versus placebo 13%), and harmless urinary discoloration. The modest increase in dyskinesias could be readily managed by levodopa down-adjustment, and, at study end there was no significant difference for the UPDRS "overall dyskinesia score" between entacapone and placebo. In conclusion, although the primary efficacy variable did not reach statistical significance, the present results demonstrate that entacapone provides additional antiparkinsonian benefits to levodopa therapy and is well tolerated in levodopa-treated PD patients experiencing wearing-off motor fluctuations despite adjunct dopamine agonist therapy. The role of dopamine in cocaine abuse has been long recognized. Cocaine use can profoundly alter dopaminergic functioning through depletion of this monoamine and changes in receptor functioning. Based on these facts, levodopa (L-dopa) pharmacotherapy may be helpful in reducing or abolishing cocaine use.
                The current studies sought to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of L-dopa as a treatment for cocaine dependence.
                In Study 1, 67 cocaine-dependent subjects were randomized in a 5-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled safety trial. Subjects received either placebo, or 400 mg L-dopa plus 100 mg of the peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor, carbidopa, in a sustained-release preparation (Sinemet CR). In Study 2, 122 cocaine-dependent subjects were enrolled in a 9-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare placebo to 400/100 mg and 800/200 mg L-dopa/carbidopa treatments. Placebo or L-dopa were administered twice daily in both studies.
                L-dopa was well tolerated with similar retention and medication adherence rates compared to placebo. Only two side effects occurred more often in L-dopa-treated patients: nausea and dizziness. L-dopa lowered diastolic blood pressure in a dose-dependent fashion. In these trials, L-dopa had no effect on cocaine use, cocaine craving, or mood.
                These two studies demonstrate the safety and tolerability of L-dopa pharmacotherapy in cocaine-dependent patients. No evidence for greater efficacy of L-dopa compared to placebo was observed. The possibility of enhancing treatment effects by combining L-dopa with other behavioral or pharmacological interventions is discussed. The long-term effectiveness of three different initial drug regimes in patients with early, mild PD was evaluated by the PD Research Group of the United Kingdom (PDRGUK). In 1995, the selegiline arm of the trial was terminated following an interim analysis.
                This was an open, randomized trial. Between 1985 and 1990, 782 patients with de-novo PD were recruited and randomized to one of three treatment arms: levodopa plus dopa decarboxylase inhibitor; levodopa plus decarboxylase inhibitor and selegiline; or bromocriptine. The main endpoints were mortality, disability, and adverse events. Intention-to-treat analysis was used.
                There was no significant difference in mortality between the bromocriptine and the levodopa arms (hazard ratio 1.15 [95% CI 0.90, 1.47]). Patients initially randomized to bromocriptine had slightly worse disability scores throughout follow-up. This difference was significant during the first years. Patients in the bromocriptine arm returned to pretreatment disability levels one year earlier than those in the levodopa arm. Patients randomized to bromocriptine had a significantly lower incidence of dyskinesias than those randomized to levodopa (rate ratio 0.73 [95% CI 0.57, 0.93]). However, this difference was not significant when only moderate to severe dyskinesias were considered. Patients in the bromocriptine arm had slightly lower rates of dystonias and on-off fluctuations, but moderate and severe forms were equally frequent in both arms.
                Starting treatment with the dopamine agonist bromocriptine does not reduce mortality in PD. A slightly lower incidence of motor complications is achieved at the expense of significantly worse disability scores throughout the first years of therapy. The best way to initiate dopaminergic therapy for early Parkinson disease remains unclear.
                To compare initial treatment with pramipexole vs levodopa in early Parkinson disease, followed by levodopa supplementation, with respect to the development of dopaminergic motor complications, other adverse events, and functional and quality-of-life outcomes.
                Multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
                Academic movement disorders clinics at 22 sites in the United States and Canada.
                Patients with early Parkinson disease (N = 301) who required dopaminergic therapy to treat emerging disability, enrolled between October 1996 and August 1997 and observed until August 2001.
                Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 0.5 mg of pramipexole 3 times per day with levodopa placebo (n = 151) or 25/100 mg of carbidopa/levodopa 3 times per day with pramipexole placebo (n = 150). Dosage was escalated during the first 10 weeks for patients with ongoing disability. Thereafter, investigators were permitted to add open-label levodopa or other antiparkinsonian medications to treat ongoing or emerging disability.
                Time to the first occurrence of dopaminergic complications: wearing off, dyskinesias, on-off fluctuations, and freezing; changes in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and quality-of-life scales; and adverse events.
                Initial pramipexole treatment resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of developing dyskinesias (24.5% vs 54%; hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.56; P<.001) and wearing off (47% vs 62.7%; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.63; P =.02). Initial levodopa treatment resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of freezing (25.3% vs 37.1%; hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.11-2.59; P =.01). By 48 months, the occurrence of disabling dyskinesias was uncommon and did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. The mean improvement in the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score from baseline to 48 months was greater in the levodopa group than in the pramipexole group (2 +/- 15.4 points vs -3.2 +/- 17.3 points, P =.003). Somnolence (36% vs 21%, P =.005) and edema (42% vs 15%, P<.001) were more common in pramipexole-treated subjects than in levodopa-treated subjects. Mean changes in quality-of-life scores did not differ between the groups.
                Initial treatment with pramipexole resulted in lower incidences of dyskinesias and wearing off compared with initial treatment with levodopa. Initial treatment with levodopa resulted in lower incidences of freezing, somnolence, and edema and provided for better symptomatic control, as measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, compared with initial treatment with pramipexole. Both options resulted in similar quality of life. Levodopa and pramipexole both appear to be reasonable options as initial dopaminergic therapy for Parkinson disease, but they are associated with different efficacy and adverse-effect profiles. To evaluate the nonergot dopamine agonist ropinirole as an adjunct to L-dopa in a randomized, double-blind trial in PD patients with motor fluctuations.
                L-dopa in the treatment of PD is associated with motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, and other adverse effects. The use of dopamine agonists in the treatment of PD delays recourse to L-dopa and thus delays the possibility of adverse effect onset.
                Ropinirole (n = 95) or placebo (n = 54) was added to L-dopa, and L-dopa was then reduced in a planned manner during the 6-month trial.
                A significantly greater number of ropinirole patients were able to achieve a 20% or greater reduction in both L-dopa dose and in percent time spent "off" compared with placebo (35.0% versus 13.0%; p = 0.003). The mean daily L-dopa dose was reduced significantly with ropinirole treatment (242 mg versus 51 mg; p < 0.001) as was the percent awake time spent "off" (11.7% versus 5.1%; p = 0.039). There was no difference in the percent of patients who withdrew because of adverse effects (15.8% on ropinirole versus 16.7% on placebo).
                Ropinirole permits a reduction in L-dopa dose with enhanced clinical benefit for PD patients with motor fluctuations. The use of a dopamine agonist with a long duration of action has theoretical advantages in attempting to reduce the motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease. We report the results of a double-blind controlled study of adding cabergoline, an ergot derivative with potent long-lasting high affinity for the D2 receptor, to levodopa therapy in 37 patients with severe fluctuations in response to treatment. Increasing dosages of cabergoline (19 patients) or placebo (18 patients) were added to each patient's stable levodopa regime. The two patient groups were similar at baseline in terms of age, disease duration, duration of levodopa treatment, and average hours "off" per day. Following incremental dose titration, patients in the cabergoline group had a significant reduction in hours "off" per day from 5.0 (SD 2.1) to 3.0 (SD 2.5), but there was no change in this measure in the placebo group [4.0 (2.2) and 3.3 (2.3) respectively]. This was not at the expense of a significant increase in dyskinesia. However, there was no difference between the groups when comparing their average Hoehn and Yahr stage of disease, and Schwab and England activities of daily living index. The antiparkinsonian efficacy and tolerability of CQA 206-291, a novel ergoline derivative with potent dopamine agonist properties, were studied during 2 months of treatment in 72 parkinsonian patients. In 36 de novo patients (patients who have not previously been treated with levodopa or dopamine agonists), CQA 206-291 was studied in an open design, while in 36 levodopa-treated patients, CQA 206-291 was studied in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled design. CQA 206-291 induced in both groups a significant antiparkinsonian effect with an effective dose range of 5-30 mg/day. The spectrum of adverse events was similar to what is commonly observed with dopamine agonists. Further studies are required to assess the putative therapeutic advantages of CQA 206-291 when compared to other antiparkinsonian drugs. Forty-six patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations and not optimally controlled on levodopa received as adjunct therapy a new nonergoline dopamine agonist, ropinirole, in a 3-month randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ropinirole significantly reduced the duration of off periods as assessed by self-scoring diary cards. There were more nonserious dopaminergic adverse events in the ropinirole group. More patients withdrew because of adverse events or insufficient therapeutic effect in the placebo group. Ropinirole has beneficial adjuvant effects in parkinsonian patients with moderate motor disability and motor fluctuations. To study the effect and safety of entacapone as an adjunct to levodopa treatment in patients with PD with wearing-off motor fluctuations.
                Entacapone is a catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor that has been shown to increase the area under the concentration-time curve of plasma levodopa by decreasing its systemic elimination, thereby promoting and improving therapeutic response to it.
                A total of 171 parkinsonian patients with wearing-off-type motor fluctuations participated in a 6-month randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study. The extent of therapeutic response was elicited in the first hand with home diary recordings of "on" and "off" times by the patient and with Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scoring by the examiner. The patients took either 200 mg entacapone or identical placebos concomitantly with each daily levodopa dose (four to 10 times a day).
                Patients' home diaries indicated that entacapone increased the mean (+/- SD) "on" time significantly (9.3 +/- 2.2 to 10.7 +/- 2.2 hours; p < 0.01) and correspondingly decreased the "off" time significantly (5.3 +/- 2.2 to 4.2 +/- 2.2 hours; p < 0.001). The average benefit derived from a daily levodopa dose as related by the patients was increased significantly (p < 0.01). The daily levodopa dose was reduced significantly in the entacapone group, the difference between the groups being 102 mg (p < 0.01). The entacapone-derived increase in the benefit from levodopa was lost almost completely following its withdrawal. Entacapone was well tolerated. Dopaminergic adverse events, which increased, were ameliorated by reducing the levodopa dose. Diarrhea was the most common nondopaminergic adverse event.
                Long-term entacapone treatment effectively prolonged the beneficial response to levodopa in parkinsonian patients with the wearing-off phenomenon. The improvement occurred irrespective of the reduction of the levodopa dose. We report the first large-scale double-blind, randomly assigned study to compare two active dopaminergic therapies for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), the dopamine agonist cabergoline (CAB) and levodopa/benserazide (levodopa). Patients with idiopathic RLS were treated with fixed daily doses of 2 or 3 mg CAB or 200 or 300 mg levodopa for 30 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by changes in the IRLS (International RLS Severity Scale) and by time to discontinuation of treatment due to loss of efficacy or augmentation. 361 of 418 screened patients (age 58 +/- 12 years, 71% females) were randomly assigned and treated (CAB: n = 178; levodopa: n = 183) in 51 centers of four European countries. Baseline IRLS total score was 25.7 +/- 6.8. The baseline-adjusted mean change from baseline to week 6 in IRLS sum score was d = -16.1 in the CAB group and d = -9.5 in the levodopa group (d = -6.6, P < 0.0001). More patients in the levodopa group (24.0%) than in the CAB group (11.9%, P = 0.0029, log-rank test) discontinued because of loss of efficacy (14.2% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.0290) or augmentation (9.8% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.0412). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 83.1% of the CAB group and in 77.6% of the levodopa group. In both groups, most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal symptoms (CAB: 55.6%, levodopa: 30.6%, P < 0.0001). This first large-scale active controlled study in RLS showed superior efficacy of cabergoline versus levodopa after a 30-week long-term therapy. Tolerability was found more favorable with levodopa than with cabergoline. There is debate about whether the initial treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease should be levodopa or a dopamine agonist.
                In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the safety and efficacy of the dopamine D2-receptor agonist ropinirole with that of levodopa over a period of five years in 268 patients with early Parkinson's disease. If symptoms were not adequately controlled by the assigned study medication, patients could receive supplementary levodopa, administered in an open-label fashion. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of dyskinesia.
                Eighty-five of the 179 patients in the ropinirole group (47 percent) and 45 of the 89 patients in the levodopa group (51 percent) completed all five years of the study. In the ropinirole group 29 of the 85 patients (34 percent) received no levodopa supplementation. The analysis of the time to dyskinesia showed a significant difference in favor of ropinirole (hazard ratio for remaining free of dyskinesia, 2.82; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.78 to 4.44; P<0.001). At five years, the cumulative incidence of dyskinesia (excluding the three patients who had dyskinesia at base line), regardless of levodopa supplementation, was 20 percent (36 of 177 patients) in the ropinirole group and 45 percent (40 of 88 patients) in the levodopa group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the mean change in scores for activities of daily living among those who completed the study. Adverse events led to the early withdrawal from the study of 48 of 179 patients in the ropinirole group (27 percent) and 29 of 89 patients in the levodopa group (33 percent). The mean (+/-SD) daily doses given by the end of the study were 16.5+/-6.6 mg of ropinirole (plus 427+/-221 mg of levodopa in patients who received supplementation) and 753+/-398 mg of levodopa (including supplements).
                Early Parkinson's disease can be managed successfully for up to five years with a reduced risk of dyskinesia by initiating treatment with ropinirole alone and supplementing it with levodopa if necessary. To determine whether the excess mortality observed in patients who received both levodopa and selegiline in a randomised trial could be explained by revised diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, autonomic or cardiovascular effects, more rapid disease progression, or drug interactions.
                Open randomised trial and blind comparison and reclassification of the cause of death of patients who were recruited from 93 hospitals between 1985 and 1990 and who had died before December 1993 in arms 1 and 2.
                United Kingdom.
                624 patients with early Parkinson's disease who were not receiving dopaminergic treatment and a subgroup fo 120 patients who died during the trial.
                Levodopa and a dopa carboxylase inhibitor (arm 1), levodopa and a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor in combination with selegiline (arm 2), or bromocriptine alone (arm 3).
                All cause mortality for 520 subjects in arms 1 and 2 and for 104 subjects who were randomised into these arms from arm 3. Cause specific mortality for people who died in the original arms 1 and 2 on the basis of the opinion of a panel, revised diagnosis and disability ratings, evidence from clinical records of either autonomic or cardiovascular episodes, other clinical features before death, and drug interactions.
                After extended follow up (mean 6.8 years) until the end of September 1995, when arm 2 was terminated, the hazard ratio for arm 2 compared with arm 1 was 1.32 (95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.79). For subjects who were randomised from arm 3 the hazard ratio for arm 2 was 1.54 (0.83 to 2.87). When all subjects were included the hazard ratio was 1.33 (1.02 to 1.74) and after adjustment for other baseline factors it was 1.30 (0.99 to 1.72). The excess mortality seemed to be greatest in the third and fourth year of follow up. Cause specific death rates showed an excess of deaths from Parkinson's disease only (hazard ratio 2.5 (1.3 to 4.7)). No significant differences were found for revised diagnosis, disability rating scores, autonomic or cardiovascular events, other clinical features, or drug interactions. Patients who died in arm 2 were more likely to have had possible dementia and a history of falls before death compared with those who died in arm 1.
                The results consistently show excess mortality in patients treated with combined levodopa and selegiline. Revised diagnosis, autonomic or cardiovascular events, or drug interactions could not explain this finding, but falls and possible dementia were more common in arm 2. The results do not support combined treatment in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease. In more advanced disease, combined treatment should perhaps be avoided in patients with postural hypotension, frequent falls, confusion, or dementia. Pramipexole, a non-ergot dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist, was investigated as an add on drug in advanced parkinsonian patients with motor fluctuations to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerance.
                Seventy eight patients of either sex with advanced Parkinson's disease and treatment complications such as motor fluctuations were enrolled into a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, multicentre study (phase II) and assigned to add on treatment with pramipexole (n=34) versus placebo (n=44) to a previously stabilised antiparkinsonian medication (7 week dose titration interval, 4 week maintenance period). The primary end point of efficacy was the change from baseline in the total score of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) in the on "period" (2 hours after intake of study medication). Safety and tolerability were assessed on the basis of adverse events, vital signs, laboratory measurements, and ECG recordings.
                There was a significant improvement of the pramipexole group in UPDRS total scores, subscores part II, III (activities of daily living and motor examination), and IV (complications of therapy). Mean UPDRS total score decreased by 37.3% under pramipexole compared with 12.2% under placebo (p<0.001). Patients under pramipexole reported an overall reduction in "off" periods of 12%--resulting in 1.7 more hours "on" time a day--compared with an increase in "off" periods of 2% under placebo. There were no unexpected safety results. The adverse event profile disclosed a high tolerability. The most important adverse events under pramipexole were fatigue, dyskinesia, and vivid dreams.
                Pramipexole administration is an efficacious and well tolerated add on therapy in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease with an improvement in activities of daily living, motor function, and treatment associated complications. To determine whether dopamine prevents deterioration of central haemodynamics and renal function in aortoiliac surgery.
                Prospective, randomised and placebo-controlled.
                University hospital.
                Thirty patients for elective vascular surgery with implantation of an aortobifemoral or an aortobiiliac graft due to aortoiliac arteriosclerosis had infusion of dopamine 3 micrograms/kg/min or placebo during the operation and 24 h postoperatively. Thoracic epidural analgesia and general anaesthesia were used.
                Central haemodynamic measurements were registered. The effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), angiotensin II, aldosterone, arginine vasopressin (AVP), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), endothelin and excretion of water and electrolytes were measured preoperatively, 1 h postoperatively and 24 h postoperatively.
                During the operation the dopamine group had higher cardiac index and heart rate together with lower pulmonary artery wedge blood pressure. ERPF and GFR did not differ between the groups. In the dopamine group ERPF was increased in all patients at the first postoperative clearance. The fractional excretion of sodium, the per- and postoperative diuresis and AVP were increased in the dopamine group as compared to the placebo group. Postoperatively, ANP in the placebo group was raised as compared to the preoperative level.
                Peroperatively, dopamine counteracted depression of left ventricular function. The increased ERPF at the first postoperative clearance in the dopamine group indicates either improved peroperative haemodynamics or a synergistic effect between dopamine and epidural sympathetic blockade. Dopamine also improved diuresis and natriuresis. More than 50% of patients with Parkinson's disease develop motor response fluctuations (the "wearing off" phenomenon) after more than five years of levodopa therapy. Inhibition of catechol-O-methyltransferase by tolcapone has been shown to increase levodopa bioavailability and plasma elimination half life, thereby prolonging the efficacy of levodopa.
                The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of tolcapone in reducing "wearing off" in levodopa treated, fluctuating parkinsonian patients. Secondary objectives included assessment of reduction in levodopa requirements, improvement in patients' clinical status, duration of improvements, and tolerability of tolcapone.
                In this multicentre, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial, 58 patients received placebo, 60 received 100 mg tolcapone three times daily (tid), and 59 received 200 mg tolcapone tid, in addition to levodopa/benserazide.
                After three months with 200 mg tolcapone tid, "off" time decreased by 26.2% of the baseline value, "on" time increased by 20.6% (P<O.01 v placebo), and the mean total daily levodopa dose decreased by 122 mg from the baseline dose of 676 mg (P<0.01). These responses were maintained up to nine months. With 100 mg tolcapone tid, "off" time decreased by 31.5% (P<0.05), "on" time increased by 21.3% (P<0.01), and the mean total daily levodopa dose decreased by 109 mg from the baseline dose of 668 mg (P<0.05). With 200 mg tolcapone tid, unified Parkinson's disease rating scale motor and total scores were significantly reduced, and quality of life (sickness impact profile) scores were significantly improved. Both dosages were well tolerated. Dyskinesia was the most often reported levodopa induced adverse event. Diarrhea was the most often reported non-dopaminergic adverse event and the most frequent reason for withdrawal from the study: four patients in the 100 mg tolcapone tid group and six in the 200 mg tid group withdrew because of diarrhea.
                Tolcapone prolongs "on" time in fluctuating parkinsonian patients while allowing a reduction in daily levodopa dosage, thereby improving the efficacy of long term levodopa therapy. The dopamine precursor levodopa has shown some, albeit relatively weak, promise in treating cocaine dependence. This study sought to identify the most appropriate behavioral therapy platform for levodopa pharmacotherapy by evaluating its effect when administered in combination with behavioral platforms of varying intensities.
                A total of 161 treatment-seeking cocaine dependent subjects received sustained release levodopa/carbidopa (400/100mg bid, Sinemet) or placebo delivered in combination with Clinical Management (ClinMan); ClinMan+cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT); or ClinMan+CBT+voucher-based reinforcement therapy (VBRT) in a 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind (for medication condition) trial. Medication compliance was monitored with riboflavin (100mg/capsule) and the Medication Event Monitoring System. Protocol compliance was addressed in weekly, 10-min nurse-delivered ClinMan sessions. Weekly, 1-h CBT sessions focused on coping skills training. VBRT (with escalating reinforcer value) provided cash-valued vouchers contingent on cocaine-negative urine toxicology results. Urine benzoylecgonine assays collected thrice-weekly were analyzed by intention-to-treat criteria using generalized linear mixed models.
                Levodopa main effects were found on all outcome measures of cocaine use. Contrasts testing the levodopa-placebo difference within each behavioral platform found reliable effects, favoring levodopa, only in the VBRT platform. Levodopa treatment with vouchers produced higher proportions of cocaine-negative urines and longer periods of consecutive abstinence compared to other treatment combinations.
                This is the first study to find a significant treatment effect for levodopa and, in doing so, to demonstrate that the magnitude of this effect is dependent upon conditions of the behavioral therapy platform. The data support use of levodopa with abstinence-based reinforcement therapy as one efficacious combination in cocaine dependence disorder treatment. To determine the effects of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist amantadine on levodopa-associated dyskinesias and motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease (PD).
                NMDA receptor blockade can ameliorate levodopa-induced dyskinesias in primates and PD patients. Amantadine, a well-tolerated and modestly effective antiparkinsonian agent, was recently found to possess NMDA antagonistic properties.
                Eighteen patients with advanced PD participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. At the end of each 3-week treatment arm, parkinsonian and dyskinesia scores were obtained during a steady-state intravenous levodopa infusion. Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias were also documented with patient-kept diaries and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) interviews.
                In the 14 patients completing this trial, amantadine reduced dyskinesia severity by 60% (p = 0.001) compared to placebo, without altering the antiparkinsonian effect of levodopa. Motor fluctuations occurring with patients' regular oral levodopa regimen also improved according to UPDRS and patient-kept diaries.
                These findings suggest that amantadine given as adjuvant to levodopa can markedly improve motor response complications and support the view that hyperfunction of NMDA receptors contributes to the pathogenesis of levodopa-associated motor complications. Levodopa-carbidopa (LD) in low dosages adequately controls symptoms in most patients with Parkinson's disease and delays the appearance of fluctuations and dyskinesias. It has been suggested that early combination therapy with bromocriptine and levodopa delays or prevents the onset of late treatment complication associated with LD monotherapy in Parkinson's disease. We have conducted this study to assess the possible benefit of combined therapy compared with levodopa monotherapy. Seventy-eight previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease were recruited over a period of 54 months and randomly allocated to either a levodopa-carbidopa (LD) Group or a levodopa-carbidopa in combination with low-dose bromocriptine (LD-Br) Group. The appearance of motor complications determined the end point of the study. We gradually increased the doses of bromocriptine (2.5-15 mg/d) or levodopa (125-500 mg/d) until the maximum "on" time was reached. In six patients, the doses of levodopa had to be increased up to the optimal dose (625-1000 mg/day). In the last evaluation the on-time and parkinsonian disability were similar in both treatment groups. We did not find statistically significant differences in the frequency of motor complications when comparing the two groups of treatment. Our study suggests that early combination of levodopa and bromocriptine does not confer any clinical benefit over levodopa alone in treating early Parkinson's disease, nor will it influence the evolution of the disease.Copyright Lippincott-Raven Publishers Tolcapone is a potent catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor that prolongs the plasma half-life of levodopa. This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study used two 10-hour clinical evaluations to compare the efficacy and safety of three doses of tolcapone (50, 200, and 400 mg tid) with placebo in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing motor fluctuations from levodopa/carbidopa. One hundred fifty-one patients completed the study. Clinical evaluations lasting 10 hours were performed on day -1 and day 42 using United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor subscale and "on/off" and dyskinesia assessments every 30 minutes. Tolcapone significantly reduced "off" time an average of 40% and increased total "on" time by about 25% at all dose levels, as compared to placebo treatment. Levodopa/carbidopa dosage and frequency were significantly reduced. Tolcapone was well tolerated, with patients experiencing typical dopaminergic side effects that could be reduced or eliminated by lowering levodopa/carbidopa dosages. Tolcapone was effective at prolonging the clinical benefit of levodopa and reducing total levodopa requirements in PD patients with motor fluctuations.
This meta-analysis confirms that motor complications are reduced with dopamine agonists compared to levodopa, but also establishes that other important side-effects are increased and symptom control is poorer with agonists. Larger, long-term comparative trials assessing patient-rated quality of life are needed to assess more reliably the balance of benefits and risks of dopamine agonists compared to levodopa.