Randomized trial of a program to enhance the competencies of children with epilepsy. [Education of children with epilepsy and their parents by the modular education program epilepsy for families (FAMOSES)--results of an evaluation study]. Effects of a broad-spectrum behavior modification treatment program on children with refractory epileptic seizures. Impact of the Children's Epilepsy Program on parents.
A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in Santiago, Chile to test the impact of a child-centered, family-focused educational program for children aged 7-14 years with epilepsy and for their parents. The objectives of the program developed and pilot-tested in Los Angeles, California were to increase the children's knowledge, perceptions of competency, and skills related to dealing with seizures. Children in the experimental group (n = 123) and their parents separately attended four 1 1/2-h sessions and then met together at the end of each session to share learning experiences. Control children (n = 113) and their parents attended three 2-h sessions with a traditional lecture followed by question-and-answer format. All participants were pretested and then retested 5 months after completion of the educational intervention. Although there was some knowledge increase among children in the control group, the knowledge of children in the experimental group was significantly enhanced in a variety of areas related to management of their seizures and unnecessary restriction of their social and play activities. There was a significant increase in the self-perceptions of social competency of children in the experimental group. Children in the experimental group without serious behavioral problems also reported significantly better behavior after the intervention than did control children. There was no impact on children's disclosure of their diagnosis to friends and others. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of the modular educational program for children with epilepsy and their parents (FAMOSES). This program was developed by an interdisciplinary project group to improve knowledge, coping, treatment outcome, emotional and practical adaptation to the condition.
                A prospective, controlled, multi-center, pre-post study design was used to examine the efficacy of the program in the treatment group compared to the waiting group (control group). Questionnaires included epilepsy specific scales regarding knowledge, attitudes, restrictions in daily living, epilepsy related fears, coping with the chronic disease and generic instruments (quality of life, KINDL). 55 parents of the treatment group completed the questionnaires three months before the course and three months later; the corresponding waiting group included 48 parents. Respectively, 31 children, who participated in the program, completed the questionnaires immediately before the course and three months later; the corresponding waiting group included 19 children.
                Children, who attended the program, showed improvements in the domains perceived restrictions (significant, medium effect size), absence from school and seizure frequency. Not significantly greater compared to the control group were the improvements of knowledge, attitudes and fears regarding to the epilepsy. Parents of the treatment group showed significant enhancements in epilepsy specific knowledge (large effect size), attitudes toward the epilepsy, management of epileptic seizures and significant reductions of fears and restrictions of their child with epilepsy (small to medium effect sizes). A group of 18 children with refractory epileptic seizures was divided into three groups--behavior modification treatment, attention control, and control groups--with the purpose of investigating the effects of a learning-based broad-spectrum treatment program superimposed on a regular medical treatment program. The design consisted of a 10-week baseline, 6-week intervention, and 10-week and 1-year follow-ups. A combination of number of seizures and seizure duration--termed "seizure index"--was used as a dependent measure. There was a significant reduction in seizure index only for those children receiving the behavior modification treatment, at both follow-ups. The results indicate that this behavioral treatment program may be of substantial help to children with epilepsy who are resistant to conventional drug therapy. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in Santiago, Chile to test the efficacy of the Children's Epilepsy Program, a child-centered, family-focused intervention developed and pilot tested in Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A., using a counseling model for parents of children with seizure disorders to help them (a) deal with their anger, resentment, and grief related to the loss of a normal child; (b) increase their knowledge about caring for their child; (c) reduce anxieties related to having a child with a seizure disorder; and (d) improve their decision-making skills. All parents were pretested and then retested 5 months after the educational interventions. Parents in the experimental group (n = 185) and their children separately attended four 1 1/2-h sessions and then met together at the end of each session to share learning experiences. Comparison group parents (n = 180) and their children jointly attended three 2-h lecture sessions followed by question-and-answer periods. Although parents' overall knowledge of epilepsy was relatively high initially, it improved considerably in both comparison and experimental groups. With regard to anxiety, at the 5-month evaluation, experimental group parents and mothers in particular were more likely than control parents to state that they were less anxious (p less than 0.001), and their anxiety, as measured by the Taylor Manifest Anxiety scale, was significantly reduced (p less than 0.01).
While each of the programmes in this review showed some benefit to children with epilepsy their impacts were extremely variable. No programme showed benefits across the full range of outcomes. No study appears to have demonstrated any detrimental effects but the evidence in favour of any single programme is insufficient to make it possible to recommend one programme rather than another. More trials, carried out by independent research teams, are needed.