Role of regular treatment with inhaled corticosteroid or leukotriene receptor antagonist in mild intermittent asthma. Comparative efficacy of once-daily therapy with inhaled corticosteroid, leukotriene antagonist or sustained-release theophylline in patients with mild persistent asthma. Leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast, can reduce the need for inhaled steroid while maintaining the clinical stability of asthmatic patients. Addition of montelukast or salmeterol to fluticasone for protection against asthma attacks: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. Comparative efficacy and anti-inflammatory profile of once-daily therapy with leukotriene antagonist or low-dose inhaled corticosteroid in patients with mild persistent asthma. Dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids under concomitant medication with montelukast in patients with asthma. High-dose inhaled steroids in asthmatics: moderate efficacy gain and suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Research Council of the Norwegian Thoracic Society. Randomised, placebo controlled trial of effect of a leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast, on tapering inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients. [A fixed combination of fluticasone and salmeterol permits better control of asthma than a beclomethasone dipropionate and montelukast combination]. Salmeterol added to inhaled corticosteroid therapy is superior to doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroids: a randomized clinical trial. An inhaled steroid improves markers of airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma. The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in the management of non asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction. Response profiles to fluticasone and montelukast in mild-to-moderate persistent childhood asthma.
Current guidelines for asthma treatment do not recommend daily maintenance therapy in patients with mild intermittent (step 1) asthma. However, because there is increasing evidence that airway inflammation is present even in this patient group, maintenance anti-inflammatory therapy may be considered. We investigated the clinical impact of regular treatment with the inhaled corticosteroid beclomethasone dipropionate and the leukotriene receptor antagonist pranlukast in the patients concerned. The study was a randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial. Eighty-five symptomatic patients with newly diagnosed mild intermittent asthma having normal pulmonary function were assigned beclomethasone or pranlukast for 8 weeks. Then, these medications were stopped for the next 16 weeks. Main outcome measures were asthma symptoms, pulmonary function, and airway inflammation. Treatment with beclomethasone and pranlukast significantly increased forced expiratory volume in 1 second and peak expiratory flow from baseline and decreased asthma symptom scores and sputum eosinophil counts and eosinophil cationic protein contents. After discontinuation of the treatment, symptom scores remained unchanged, but pulmonary function and airway inflammation were aggravated and then returned to the baseline levels. Therefore, maintenance therapy with inhaled corticosteroid or leukotriene receptor antagonist can provide further improvements in asthma symptoms, pulmonary function, and airway inflammation, and discontinuation of the therapy causes worsening of asthma, indicating that stopping or interrupting anti-inflammatory therapy may not be advisable in patients with symptomatic mild intermittent asthma. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the inhaled budesonide, sustained-release theophylline and montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in patients with mild persistent asthma. In this single-center, randomized, parallel-group study that not designed blindly and placebo-controlled manner, 74 patients with mild persistent asthma were treated with either inhaled budesonide 400 microg once daily, oral montelukast 10 mg once daily, or sustained-release theophylline 400 mg once daily for 3 months. In all three treatment groups, improvements were attained in overall asthma control. Asthma symptom scores and supplemental beta2-agonist use were quite the same in all three treatment groups (P>0.05). Although inhaled budesonide group resulted in significantly greater improvements compared with the other two groups in the lung functions (P<0.05), the changes in FEV1 and PEF are within the baseline variability and there was no statistically significant difference among the groups when analyzed by treatment month (P>0.05). Exacerbations of asthma were experienced by 16% of the patients in the montekulast group, by 12.5% of the patients in the theophylline group, and by none of the patients in the budesonide group. The adverse event in each of the three groups was 12%, 16% and 16.7%, respectively. It is concluded that the most important clinical parameters do not point that one of the treatments is more effective than others. Treatment with inhaled corticosteroid is preferred, but sustained-release theophylline and leukotriene antagonists are alternative controller medications in mild persistent asthma. Oral leukotriene receptor antagonists have been shown to have efficacy in chronic asthma.
                To determine whether the addition of montelukast could lead to a reduction in inhaled corticosteroid dose without a significant decrease in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR).
                After a 4-week run-in period, 191 moderate-to-severe asthmatic patients whose asthma had been well controlled with daily inhaled corticosteroid therapy (beclometasone dipropionate 800 to 1600 micro g/day), were randomly assigned to one of two treatments - placebo (n = 98) or montelukast 10 mg once daily (n = 93) - for a 24-week, multicentre, double-blind, treatment period. At the beginning of the active treatment period, the daily dose of inhaled corticosteroid was halved in all of the patients. In addition, the inhaled corticosteroid dose was subsequently titrated every 8 weeks, based on PEFR, asthma symptoms and beta-agonist use.
                After 8 weeks of a 50% reduction in inhaled corticosteroid use, morning PEFR increased by 5.3 +/- 32.3 L/min from baseline in patients receiving montelukast and significantly decreased by 6.9 +/- 29.0 L/min in those receiving placebo (P = 0.035). In addition, evening PEFR significantly decreased by 9.8 +/- 28.5 L/min (P = 0.003) in the placebo group, but was maintained in the montelukast group. In spite of a subsequent 50% reduction in the inhaled corticosteroid dose every 8 weeks, morning and evening PEFRs were maintained over the 24-week treatment period in the montelukast group; PEFR significantly decreased in the placebo group. There was a significant difference between the two groups with regard to morning PEFR, therapy score and asthmatic score at weeks 8, 16 and 24, as well as evening PEFR at week 8. However, the symptom scores were not significantly different between the two groups or within each group.
                These data suggest that montelukast reduces the need for inhaled corticosteroids while maintaining asthma control over a 24-week period. Therefore, montelukast may be useful for long-term treatment in patients with asthma who require high doses of inhaled corticosteroids. For patients whose asthma is uncontrolled with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids, addition of alternative therapy instead of increasing the steroid dose is recommended by current treatment guidelines.
                To compare montelukast, a once-daily leukotriene receptor antagonist, and salmeterol, a twice-daily, long-acting beta-agonist, concomitantly administered with inhaled fluticasone, according to the percentage of patients without an asthma attack for 1 year.
                A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was conducted. Adult patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma (ages 14-73 years) receiving inhaled fluticasone (220 microg/d) who remained symptomatic during a 4-week run-in period were randomized to the addition of salmeterol (84 microg/d) or montelukast (10 mg/d) for 48 weeks.
                Of the 1,473 randomized patients, 743 were randomized to montelukast and 730 to salmeterol; 1,059 patients completed the study. Eighty percent of patients in the montelukast group and 83.3% of patients in the salmeterol group remained attack free during the 48 weeks of treatment (relative risk, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.49). Montelukast significantly reduced blood eosinophil counts compared with salmeterol, whereas salmeterol significantly increased prealbuterol forced expiratory volume in 1 second, asthma-specific quality of life, morning peak expiratory flow rate, and decreased nocturnal awakenings compared with montelukast. Differences between treatments were small, and both treatments were generally well tolerated.
                Addition of montelukast or salmeterol to an inhaled corticosteroid similarly protected most patients from experiencing an asthma attack during a 1-year period, but, based on noninferiority limits, the study was inconclusive with regard to a difference between treatment groups. Current guidelines advocate the use of preventative anti-inflammatory therapy for mild persistent asthma.
                We compared the efficacy and anti-inflammatory profiles of a leukotriene receptor antagonist and a low dose of inhaled corticosteroid in patients with mild persistent asthma.
                Twenty-one adult patients with mild asthma received 4 weeks of either once-daily inhaled hydrofluoroalkane triamcinolone acetonide (450 microg/day ex-actuator dose) or oral montelukast (10 mg/day) in a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blinded crossover study. Measurements were made before and after 2 and 4 weeks of each treatment.
                At the endpoint (after 4 weeks), triamcinolone and montelukast had improved the primary outcome (provocative dose of methacholine required to produce a 20% fall in FEV(1)) in comparison with placebo (P <.05), there being no difference between the treatments (1.09-fold; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.63). Triamcinolone was better than placebo or montelukast for effects on all other surrogate inflammatory markers (P <.05), including exhaled nitric oxide, blood eosinophils, serum eosinophil cationic protein, plasma intracellular circulating adhesion molecule 1, and plasma E-selectin. Both treatments improved (P <.05) morning and evening peak flow, nighttime beta2-agonist use, and symptoms in comparison with placebo, though triamcinolone was better than montelukast (P <.05) with regard to peak flow. Triamcinolone produced suppression (P <.05) of overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine and serum osteocalcin.
                Once-daily inhaled corticosteroid and leukotriene antagonist improved the primary outcome variable of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to a similar degree. The present study aimed at comparing the effects of a dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids on lung function, indirect measures of airway inflammation and clinical scores during treatment with a leucotriene receptor antagonist. In 50 patients (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 94% predicted), steroid doses (800 microg beclomethasone dipropionate) were first reduced to 50% and then to 25%, for 6 weeks each. One group received a placebo and the other group received montelukast (10 mg). The first reduction did not cause significant effects. During the second, FEV1 and peak expiratory flow decreased in both groups (p<0.001). Daytime symptoms were not altered with placebo but were reduced by montelukast (p<0.05). Night-time symptoms were slightly elevated with placebo (p<0.05) but not montelukast, as well as the use of supplemental salbutamol. Changes in provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20), sputum eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide were mostly nonsignificant for both placebo and montelukast. These data demonstrate that a 75% reduction in the dose of steroid given to patients with asthma led to a deterioration in lung function not prevented by montelukast, whereas changes in clinical state seemed to favour montelukast treatment. It therefore appears that potential effects of montelukast, in the presence of low-dose steroids, could not be attributed to single indices of lung function or airway inflammation. We wanted to evaluate the improvement in efficacy when increasing the daily dose of inhaled steroids and to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of 1.6 mg beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) with that of 2.0 mg fluticasone propionate (FP). The study was a randomized, double-blind, 3 month, multicentre study. One hundred and thirty four asthmatics currently using inhaled steroids (0.4-1.6 mg BDP or budesonide (BUD)) were stratified according to pretrial daily steroid use. Within each stratum they were randomized to either 1.6 mg BDP or 2.0 mg FP. A significant increase in the primary efficacy variables, i.e. mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) (approximately 20 l.min-1) during the treatment period, was found for both treatments. No significant differences between the drugs were revealed for these primary or any other secondary efficacy variables (use of beta 2-agonists, symptom scores, and PEF, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) recorded at the clinical visits). However, significant differences between treatments occurred regarding decrease of serum cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone. We conclude that, although both treatments gave statistically significant increases in efficacy parameters when compared with baseline, the increases were so small that they can be regarded as being clinically unimportant. Daily doses of BDP, 1.6 mg, and FP, 2.0 mg, had comparable effects on lung function. A suppression of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis was only found with a daily dose of 2 mg FP. To determine the ability of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, to allow tapering of inhaled corticosteroids in clinically stable asthmatic patients.
                Double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, parallel group study. After a single blind placebo run in period, during which (at most) two inhaled corticosteroids dose decreases occurred, qualifying, clinically stable patients were allocated randomly to receive montelukast (10 mg tablet) or matching placebo once daily at bedtime for up to 12 weeks.
                23 academic asthma centres in United States, Canada, and Europe.
                226 clinically stable patients with chronic asthma receiving high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (113 randomised to montelukast and 113 to placebo).
                Every 2 weeks, the inhaled corticosteroids dose was tapered, maintained, or increased (rescue) based on a standardised clinical score.
                Last tolerated dose of inhaled corticosteroids.
                Compared with placebo, montelukast allowed significant (P=0. 046) reduction in the inhaled corticosteroid dose (montelukast 47% v placebo 30%; least square mean difference 17.6%, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 34.8). Fewer patients on montelukast (18 (16%) v 34 (30%) placebo, P=0.01) required discontinuation because of failed rescue.
                Montelukast reduces the need for inhaled corticosteroids among patients requiring moderate to high doses of corticosteroid to maintain asthma control. It is now recommended to add an inhaled long-acting beta 2-agonist, or as an alternative, to add a leukotriene-antagonist, in patients whose asthma is insufficiently controlled with an inhaled corticosteroid alone. A randomised, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study was carried out in 246 patients of at least 15 years, whose asthma was not adequately controlled with a medium dose of an inhaled corticosteroid. They received either fluticasone/salmeterol combination 250/50 micrograms one inhalation twice daily or CFC beclomethasone dipropionate 250 micrograms two puffs twice daily plus montelukast 10 mg in the evening for 12 weeks. The mean morning PEFR (main criterion) was significantly (p = 0.017) more improved with fluticasone/salmeterol (+44.2 L/min) than with beclomethasone dipropionate plus montelukast (+31.0 L/min). Other outcomes showed significantly better improvements (p 0.022 Pound) with fluticasone/salmeterol than with beclomethasone plus montelukast. The two treatments were well tolerated. Fluticasone/salmeterol provided a better asthma control than beclomethasone dipropionate plus montelukast in patients insufficiently controlled with an inhaled corticosteroid alone. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of adding salmeterol xinafoate to concurrent inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate therapy with doubling the dose of beclomethasone dipropionate in patients experiencing symptoms on low-dose beclomethasone. Salmeterol added to low-dose beclomethasone was superior (p < or = 0.05) to doubling the dose of beclomethasone in improving peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), and in reducing symptoms of asthma, sleep loss, nighttime awakenings, and use of albuterol. Both treatment regimens had comparable safety profiles. In asthma patients inadequately controlled despite the use of low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (i.e., less than 400 microg per day), the addition of salmeterol may be a more effective treatment option than doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroids. Airway inflammation can be demonstrated in mildly asthmatic patients who are not treated with inhaled steroids. Current guidelines recommend that inhaled steroids should be introduced in mild asthmatics who use an inhaled beta2-agonist more than once daily. It was postulated that inhaled steroids can have anti-inflammatory effects in patients with even milder disease. The effect of 4 weeks of treatment with budesonide (800 microg twice daily by Turbohaler) was studied in 10 steroid-naive mildly asthmatic patients (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) = 96+/-1.4% predicted) who required an inhaled beta2-agonist less than one puff daily, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover fashion. Spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), bronchial responsiveness (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20)), and sputum induction were performed before and after each treatment period. Following budesonide treatment, there were significant improvements in FEV1, and PC20, in association with a significant reduction in the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum. Exhaled NO levels tended towards reduction, but the change was nonsignificant. There were also nonsignificant reductions in sputum eosinophil cationic protein and tumour necrosis factor-alpha levels. In conclusion inhaled budesonide can lead to improvements in noninvasive markers of airway inflammation, in association with a small improvement in lung function, even in mildly asthmatic patients who require an inhaled beta2-agonist less than once daily. This suggests a potential benefit of inhaled corticosteroids, even in relatively asymptomatic asthma. The aims of this investigation were to evaluate the efficacy of regular inhaled beclomethasone in the control of symptoms and lung function with non-asthmatic smoking related obstructive pulmonary disease and to evaluate the relationship between clinical responses to a short course of oral prednisone and longer term outcomes using inhaled steroid.
                The study was a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover investigation in 18 patients. The active treatment was inhaled beclomethasone 1000 micrograms given twice daily for three months by metered dose inhaler. At the end of each treatment period, patients received oral prednisone 30 mg/day for ten days. The two treatment phases were separated by a one month washout interval. Peak flow rates, symptom scores and "rescue" bronchodilator use were recorded twice daily. Lung function (FEV1, FVC and lung volumes) and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PC20 methacholine) were measured at monthly visits. The number of exacerbations requiring intervention therapy were also recorded.
                There were no consistent benefits attributable to beclomethasone. Lung function was not significantly better as a result of active treatment. Sputum production improved but other symptom scores were similar during active and placebo therapy. Three patients exhibited an increase in FEV1 of 15% or more during active treatment but did not do so when oral prednisone was administered immediately after the period of placebo treatment. A further three patients showed an improvement in FEV1 of 15% or more with oral prednisone but failed to improve during treatment with inhaled beclomethasone. The predictive value of the "trial of steroid" was 0% and 81.3% for positive and negative outcomes respectively.
                Our results indicate that in non-asthmatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease inhaled corticosteroid fails to achieve significant improvements in either lung function or symptoms. The response to a "trial of steroid" using oral prednisone is not clinically helpful in selecting the small number of patients who may subsequently benefit from this form of therapy. Outcome data are needed to base recommendations for controller asthma medication use in school-aged children.
                We sought to determine intraindividual and interindividual response profiles and predictors of response to an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA).
                An ICS, fluticasone propionate (100 mug twice daily), and an LTRA, montelukast (5-10 mg nightly, age dependent), were administered to children ages 6 to 17 years with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma using only as-needed bronchodilators in a multicenter, double-masked, 2-sequence, 16-week crossover trial. Clinical, pulmonary, and inflammatory responses to these controllers were evaluated.
                Improvements in most clinical asthma control measures occurred with both controllers. However, clinical outcomes (asthma control days [ACDs], the validated Asthma Control Questionnaire, and albuterol use), pulmonary responses (FEV(1)/forced vital capacity, peak expiratory flow variability, morning peak expiratory flow, and measures of impedance), and inflammatory biomarkers (exhaled nitric oxide [eNO]) improved significantly more with fluticasone than with montelukast treatment. eNO was both a predictor of ACDs (P = .011) and a response indicator (P = .003) in discriminating the difference in ACD response between fluticasone and montelukast.
                The more favorable clinical, pulmonary, and inflammatory responses to an ICS than to an LTRA provide pediatric-based group evidence to support ICSs as the preferred first-line therapy for mild-to-moderate persistent asthma in children. eNO, as a predictor of response, might help to identify individual children not receiving controller medication who achieve a greater improvement in ACDs with an ICS compared with an LTRA.
The addition of licensed doses of anti-leukotrienes to add-on therapy to inhaled glucocorticoids brings modest improvement in lung function. Although addition of anti-leukotrienes to inhaled glucocorticoids appears comparable to increasing the dose of inhaled steroids, the power of the review is insufficient to confirm the equivalence of both treatment options. Addition of anti-leukotrienes is associated with superior asthma control after glucocorticoid tapering; although the glucocorticoid-sparing effect cannot be quantified at present, it appears modest.