Randomized, controlled, blinded trial of doxapram for extubation of the very low birthweight infant. [A comparison of the efficacy of aminophylline and doxapram in preventing idiopathic apnea in preterm newborn infants]. A blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to compare theophylline and doxapram for the treatment of apnea of prematurity.
The objective of the study was to determine whether administering doxapram by infusion to the very low birthweight infant, prior to extubation during the first 3 weeks of life, would increase the incidence of successful extubation. The study patients, 56 infants of less than 1251 g birthweight and less than 30 weeks' gestation, were entered in the first 3 weeks of life when lung disease had started to improve. A randomized blinded trial was performed, with infants receiving 3.5 mg kg(-1) doxapram bolus, followed by an infusion at 1 mg kg(-1) h(-1), or placebo. Weaning from positive pressure ventilation was standardized and extubation occurred after a 12 h trial of an intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) rate of 6 breaths min(-1), if PCO2 < 55 mmHg, pH > 7.26, and FiO2 < 0.45. Study drug was continued for 48 h postextubation, and the infants were placed on nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for 72 h postextubation. Extubation failure within the first 72 h after extubation was objectively defined in terms of acidosis (pH < 7.26), hypercarbia (PCO2 > 55 mmHg), excessive oxygen requirement (FiO2 > 0.8) or frequent apnoea (more than three in 12 h, or more than two requiring face mask IMV in 24 h). No difference was noted in the frequency of successful extubation between the groups. Fifteen infants in each group were successfully extubated before the 10th day of the study. In conclusion, when given in accordance with this protocol doxapram does not increase the likelihood of successful extubation in the very low birthweight infant. Increasing successful extubations in this group of infants will require other strategies. Doxapram is an analeptic of the respiratory system that has been used in the last few years for the treatment of idiopathic apnea spells in infants who show resistance to methylxantine. In this study we have compared the efficacy of aminophylline and doxapram for the prevention of idiopathic apnea spells in two groups of preterm infants comparable for gestational age, birthweight and postnatal age. The two drugs resulted to be effective in preventing the spells of apnea in 66% and 60% of the cases respectively. In the cases in which there was a partial or negative response, the association of the two substances resulted in a noticeable reduction of the apnea spells. The positive effect of the association of aminophylline and doxapram is probably due to the different action mechanism on the stimulation of the respiratory system. A blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of theophylline and doxapram therapy in 31 infants with significant apnea of prematurity. Of 10 infants, two had a short-term response to placebo, 8 of 10 infants to theophylline, and 7 of 11 infants to doxapram (placebo vs treatment with theophylline or doxapram: p = 0.01). The two infants who initially responded to placebo remained responsive for the duration of the study. Of the eight infants in whom treatment with placebo failed, five were randomly assigned to receive theophylline, for a total of 15 infants treated with theophylline, and two of the eight were randomly assigned to receive doxapram, for a total of 13 infants treated with doxapram; the remaining infant required tracheal intubation. Of the 15 infants randomly assigned to receive theophylline, seven responded for the duration of the study; of the eight infants who did not respond to treatment with theophylline, five responded to doxapram, one responded to a combination of theophylline and doxapram, and two remained resistant to treatment. Of the 13 infants randomly assigned to receive doxapram four responded for the duration of the study; of the nine who did not respond to doxapram, seven responded to theophylline, one responded to a combination of theophylline and doxapram, and one remained resistant to treatment. This study demonstrates that although therapy with theophylline or doxapram is associated with a significant short-term reduction in the incidence of apnea compared with that in placebo-treated infants, the long-term response to treatment is frequently incomplete and is not sustained more than 1 week.
The evidence does not support the routine use of doxapram to assist endotracheal extubation in preterm infants who are eligible for methylxanthine and/or CPAP. The results should be interpreted with caution because the small number of infants studied does not allow reliable assessment of the benefits and harms of doxapram. Further trials are required to evaluate the benefits and harms of doxapram compared with no treatment or with other treatments, such as methylxanthines or CPAP, to evaluate whether it is more effective in infants not responding to these other treatments, and to assess whether the drug is effective when given orally.