Comparison of combined therapies in treatment of secondary failure to glyburide. Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. Insulin versus a combination of insulin and sulfonylurea in the treatment of NIDDM patients with secondary oral failure.
To compare the effectiveness of alternative combined treatments in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) with secondary failure to sulfonylureas.
                A crossover study was carried out by randomly assigning 16 NIDDM patients to a combined treatment with the addition of either a single low-dose bedtime injection of 0.2 U/kg body wt NPH insulin or an oral three times a day administration of 1.5 g/day metformin to the previously ineffective glyburide treatment.
                Both combined therapies significantly (P less than 0.01) reduced fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPPG) and percentage of HbA1. The addition of metformin was more effective than the addition of insulin (P less than 0.01) in improving PPPG in the 8 patients with higher post-glucagon C-peptide levels. In contrast, the efficacy of neither combined therapy was related to patient age, age of diabetes onset, duration of the disease, percentage of ideal body weight, and FPG. The addition of insulin but not metformin caused a significant (P less than 0.01) increase of mean body weight. Neither combined treatment caused changes in serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels. No symptomatic hypoglycemic episode was reported in any of the 16 patients.
                The addition of bedtime NPH insulin or metformin was effective in improving the glycemic control in most NIDDM patients with secondary failure to glyburide. The combination of metformin and sulfonylurea was more effective in reducing PPPG and did not induce any increase of body weight. The efficacy of thiazolidinediones, as compared with other oral glucose-lowering medications, in maintaining long-term glycemic control in type 2 diabetes is not known.
                We evaluated rosiglitazone, metformin, and glyburide as initial treatment for recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes in a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial involving 4360 patients. The patients were treated for a median of 4.0 years. The primary outcome was the time to monotherapy failure, which was defined as a confirmed level of fasting plasma glucose of more than 180 mg per deciliter (10.0 mmol per liter), for rosiglitazone, as compared with metformin or glyburide. Prespecified secondary outcomes were levels of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function.
                Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a cumulative incidence of monotherapy failure at 5 years of 15% with rosiglitazone, 21% with metformin, and 34% with glyburide. This represents a risk reduction of 32% for rosiglitazone, as compared with metformin, and 63%, as compared with glyburide (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The difference in the durability of the treatment effect was greater between rosiglitazone and glyburide than between rosiglitazone and metformin. Glyburide was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (including congestive heart failure) than was rosiglitazone (P<0.05), and the risk associated with metformin was similar to that with rosiglitazone. Rosiglitazone was associated with more weight gain and edema than either metformin or glyburide but with fewer gastrointestinal events than metformin and with less hypoglycemia than glyburide (P<0.001 for all comparisons).
                The potential risks and benefits, the profile of adverse events, and the costs of these three drugs should all be considered to help inform the choice of pharmacotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00279045 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
                Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. Comparison of the effectiveness of combined therapy vs. an insulin regimen in NIDDM patients with secondary failure of oral hypoglycemic agents. RESEARCH DESIGN, PATIENTS AND METHODS: 27 NIDDM patients were randomly allocated to Group A (n = 14, insulin) and Group B (n = 13, insulin and sulfonylurea) with crossover after 3 months. After the next 3 months a decision was made about the further treatment according to the metabolic control. The patients were then treated for another year with the more successful regimen. Metabolic control, residual beta-cell secretory capacity, degree of peripheral insulin resistance (clamp) and insulin dose were followed during the whole study.
                (median, interquartile range, in brackets; *, statistically significant difference at P < 0.05): the combined therapy was better than insulin alone in 2/3 of patients. Glycemic control was better (HbA1c at 3 months: Group A = 7.9(1.1)% vs. Group B = 7.0(0.5)%*; HbA1c at 6 months: Group A = 7.4(1.5)% vs. Group B = 8.1(1.5)%. Insulin dose was lower during the combined therapy in the first 3 months: Group A = 0.62(0.18) U/kg body weight vs. Group B = 0.39(0.16) U/kg body weight*. Combined treatment was associated with increased C-peptide excretion both fasting and postprandially. No significant differences in peripheral insulin resistance were noted between the two groups. The combined treatment remained successful even after one year. The two groups of patients with different effective treatment did not differ significantly in any of the observed parameters.
                the combined therapy was more effective than insulin alone. Its favourable effect persisted after treatment for a year. It seems better to start the treatment of the oral failure with combined therapy compared with insulin first and later followed by combined therapy. On the basis of the observed parameters it is impossible to determine in advance which kind of treatment is more suitable for the individual patient.
According to moderate quality evidence, corticosteroids given alone do not significantly hasten recovery from GBS or affect the long-term outcome. According to low quality evidence oral corticosteroids delay recovery. Diabetes requiring insulin was significantly more common and hypertension less common with corticosteroids.