A randomized controlled trial comparing an intraoperative goal-directed strategy with routine clinical practice in patients undergoing peripheral arterial surgery. Fluid resuscitation in the management of early septic shock (FINESS): a randomized controlled feasibility trial. Efficacy of hetastarch in the resuscitation of patients with multisystem trauma and shock. Treatment of hemorrhagic shock with intraosseous or intravenous infusion of hypertonic saline dextran solution. Out-of-hospital hypertonic resuscitation after traumatic hypovolemic shock: a randomized, placebo controlled trial.
We hypothesized that, in vascular surgery patients, the application of a goal-directed strategy based on a pulse contour-derived cardiac index would be associated with a better haemodynamic status than the application of routine perioperative care and that the amount of fluid and/or inotropes required in such a goal-directed therapy depended on the general anaesthetic technique used.
                Patients undergoing peripheral arterial bypass grafting were randomly assigned to three groups. In group 1, haemodynamic management was performed according to routine clinical practice. In the two other groups (groups 2 and 3) a goal-directed therapy was applied aiming to maintain the pulse contour-derived cardiac index above 2.5 l m min. Patients in groups 1 and 2 received sevoflurane-based anaesthesia and patients in group 3 propofol-based anaesthesia. Haemodynamic variables, amount of fluid and administration of inotropes were assessed at different time intervals.
                The amount of fluid administered was not significantly different between the groups. Two patients in group 1, 13 patients in group 2 and 12 patients in group 3 were treated with dobutamine (P < 0.001). None of the patients anaesthetized with sevoflurane (groups 1 and 2) experienced postoperative cardiovascular complications, whereas four patients in the total intravenous group (group 3) experienced major postoperative cardiovascular complications (P = 0.005).
                In the conditions of the present study, the application of a goal-directed therapy aiming to maintain the cardiac index above 2.5 l min m did not result in a higher tissue oxygen delivery than when applying the standard haemodynamic strategy nor did it depend on the anaesthetic technique used. It is unknown whether fluid resuscitation with colloid or crystalloid in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock is associated with an improvement in clinical outcome. This randomized controlled trial determined the feasibility of conducting a large trial testing resuscitation with pentastarch vs normal saline in early septic shock, powered for a difference in mortality.
                At three Canadian and one New Zealand academic centre, 40 patients with early septic shock defined by at least two systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, infectious source, and persistent hypotension after >or= 1 L of crystalloid fluid were recruited. Feasibility measures were patient recruitment, blinding of the study fluids, and acceptability of the goal directed algorithms. Boluses of blinded normal saline or pentastarch (500 mL - maximum 3 L or 28 mL x kg(-1)) were administered within goal directed care for the first 12 hr.
                Of 161 patients screened, 121 were excluded and 40 patients were enrolled, for a recruitment rate of 0.75 patients/site/month. Only 57% of physicians and 54% of nurses correctly guessed the study fluid (P = 0.46 and P = 0.67, respectively). The goal directed algorithms were acceptable to 97% of physicians.
                The ability to recruit patients in this pilot randomized controlled trial was below expectations. Blinding of study fluids was adequate, and resuscitation algorithms were acceptable to most physicians. Methods to improve recruitment are required to enhance the feasibility of conducting a multicentre fluid resuscitation trial in early septic shock. A prospective trial of 6% hetastarch (HES) v 5% plasma protein fraction (PPF) as the colloid component of intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation was conducted in 32 patients with multisystem trauma and/or hemorrhagic shock. Patient age, mechanism and pattern of injury, and IV fluid requirements were similar in both groups. No intergroup differences were noted in indexes of hepatic, pulmonary, or renal function or in the incidence of infection. The frequency of other complications, including bleeding diatheses, and mortality were identical in the two groups. Although this investigation should be viewed as a pilot study, our results suggest that, compared with PPF, HES in large volumes is a safe, effective colloid solution in the resuscitation of patients with multisystem trauma and/or hemorrhagic shock. Further study of HES in a larger number of patients is warranted by these findings. The efficacy of intravenous or intraosseous infusion of 250 ml of 7.5% NaCl and 6% dextran 60 (H/H) was compared with intravenous Ringer's lactate (RL) for the initial treatment of patients with hemorrhagic shock due to upper gastrointestinal bleeding. 49 patients were randomly assigned to receive either H/H (n = 26) or RL (n = 23). In the first 16 patients with H/H and in all RL patients, solutions were infused by the intravenous route, while the intraosseous route through sternal puncture was chosen for the last 10 H/H subjects. H/H patients were analyzed together since no differences were noticed between the routes of infusion. The H/H group also received 2.3 +/- 0.7 liters of intravenous crystalloid solutions in the first hour and 4.4 +/- 0.1 liters in the 24-hour period, while RL received 3.3 +/- 0.7 and 7.3 +/- 2.4 liters, respectively. Blood pressure (BP) increased during the first 15 min in the H/H group (from 61 +/- 17/30 +/- 12 to 85 +/- 30/48 +/- 14 mm Hg) and thereafter, while remaining unchanged in the RL group (from 75 +/- 18/40 +/- 12 to 75 +/- 17/40 +/- 14 mm Hg; p less than 0.05). The differences between groups were significant throughout 24 h. Urine output and improvement of the Glasgow Coma Score were also higher in H/H patients than in the control group (p less than 0.05). There were 5 deaths in RL group and 1 in the H/H group. Sternal of peripheral vein infusion of 250 ml of 7.5% NaCl/6% dextran 60 is an effective initial treatment of hemorrhagic shock. To determine whether out-of-hospital administration of hypertonic fluids would improve survival after severe injury with hemorrhagic shock.
                Hypertonic fluids have potential benefit in the resuscitation of severely injured patients because of rapid restoration of tissue perfusion, with a smaller volume, and modulation of the inflammatory response, to reduce subsequent organ injury.
                Multicenter, randomized, blinded clinical trial, May 2006 to August 2008, 114 emergency medical services agencies in North America within the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. Inclusion criteria: injured patients, age ≥ 15 years with hypovolemic shock (systolic blood pressure ≤ 70 mm Hg or systolic blood pressure 71-90 mm Hg with heart rate ≥ 108 beats per minute). Initial resuscitation fluid, 250 mL of either 7.5% saline per 6% dextran 70 (hypertonic saline/dextran, HSD), 7.5% saline (hypertonic saline, HS), or 0.9% saline (normal saline, NS) administered by out-of-hospital providers. Primary outcome was 28-day survival. On the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring board, the study was stopped early (23% of proposed sample size) for futility and potential safety concern.
                 : A total of 853 treated patients were enrolled, among whom 62% were with blunt trauma, 38% with penetrating. There was no difference in 28-day survival-HSD: 74.5% (0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.5 to 7.8); HS: 73.0% (-1.4; 95% CI, -8.7-6.0); and NS: 74.4%, P = 0.91. There was a higher mortality for the postrandomization subgroup of patients who did not receive blood transfusions in the first 24 hours, who received hypertonic fluids compared to NS [28-day mortality-HSD: 10% (5.2; 95% CI, 0.4-10.1); HS: 12.2% (7.4; 95% CI, 2.5-12.2); and NS: 4.8%, P < 0.01].
                Among injured patients with hypovolemic shock, initial resuscitation fluid treatment with either HS or HSD compared with NS, did not result in superior 28-day survival. However, interpretation of these findings is limited by the early stopping of the trial. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov, NCT00316017.
We found no evidence from randomised controlled trials for or against early or larger volume of intravenous fluid administration in uncontrolled haemorrhage. There is continuing uncertainty about the best fluid administration strategy in bleeding trauma patients. Further randomised controlled trials are needed to establish the most effective fluid resuscitation strategy.