Ranitidine controls nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough on omeprazole: a controlled study in normal subjects. Bedtime ranitidine does not eliminate the need for a second daily dose of omeprazole to suppress nocturnal gastric pH. A short-term controlled trial of an adjustable oral appliance for the treatment of mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea.
Proton pump inhibitors administered twice daily do not provide complete nocturnal acid suppression. Acid breakthrough, or decrease in intragastric pH to <4 for an hour or longer, occurs in three quarters of normal subjects and patients at night. We compared the effect of a third dose of omeprazole at bedtime with that of a dose of ranitidine at bedtime on residual nocturnal acid secretion in patients receiving omeprazole twice daily.
                Twelve volunteers underwent overnight intragastric pH monitoring after 7 days of treatment with omeprazole, 20 mg twice daily, followed by different treatment supplements at bedtime: placebo; additional omeprazole, 20 mg; ranitidine, 150 mg; and ranitidine, 300 mg.
                Additional omeprazole at bedtime reduced the percentage of time with intragastric pH of <4 from 48% to 31% (P < 0.005) compared with omeprazole twice daily with placebo at bedtime. Ranitidine at bedtime reduced this parameter more, 5% with 150 mg and 6% with 300 mg (P <0.01 vs. omeprazole twice daily plus bedtime). Results for percentage of time with intragastric pH <3 were similar. Eleven subjects had acid breakthrough with placebo at bedtime; 7 with omeprazole at bedtime (P = NS); 4 with ranitidine, 150 mg at bedtime; and 3 with ranitidine, 300 mg at bedtime (P < 0. 05, ranitidine vs. placebo).
                Bedtime ranitidine is more effective than bedtime omeprazole on residual nocturnal acid secretion in patients receiving omeprazole twice daily. This finding suggests that fasting breakthrough nocturnal acid secretion in patients receiving omeprazole twice daily is most likely histamine related. We have previously shown that 70% of patients experience nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough (defined as pH<4 for more than 60 min between 22.00 and 06.00 hours) on twice a day (b.d.) proton pump inhibitor. Adding 150 or 300 mg of ranitidine at bedtime is more effective than additional omeprazole at bedtime in control of night-time acid breakthrough.
                To assess whether omeprazole 20 mg AM plus ranitidine 150 mg HS would be as effective as omeprazole 20 mg before breakfast and dinner (b.d. AC) in intragastric pH control, particularly during the overnight period.
                Twenty healthy volunteers (11 males, 9 females, mean age 32.7 years) were treated with omeprazole (OME) 20 mg b.d. AC and placebo HS or omeprazole 20 mg AM and placebo before dinner plus ranitidine (RAN) 150 mg HS for 7 days, in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, with a 1 week washout between study periods. On day 8 subjects were monitored for 24 h with a single channel pH probe placed in the stomach 10 cm below the proximal border of the LES. Percentage time pH<4 for total, upright and recumbent positions were compared between the two regimens using Wilcoxon matched pairs testing.
                Expressed in median values of percentage time pH<4: upright time intragastric pH<4 on OME 20 mg b.d. AC was 18.9 compared to 29.7 on OME AM + RAN HS (P = 0.003). Recumbent time pH<4 on OME 20 mg b.d. AC was 23.45 compared to 44.75 on OME AM + RAN HS (P = 0.02).
                Bedtime ranitidine does not eliminate the need for an evening dose of omeprazole to control intragastric pH in patients requiring more than a single daily dose of omeprazole. Although oral appliances are effective in some patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), they are not universally effective. A novel anterior mandibular positioner (AMP) has been developed with an adjustable hinge that allows progressive advancement of the mandible. The objective of this prospective crossover study was to compare efficacy, side effects, patient compliance, and preference between AMP and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in patients with symptomatic mild to moderate OSA.
                Twenty four patients of mean (SD) age 44.0 (10.6) years were recruited with a mean (SD) body mass index of 32.0 (8.2) kg/m2, Epworth sleepiness score 10.7 (3.4), and apnoea/hypopnoea index 26.8 (11.9)/hour. There was a two week wash-in and a two week wash-out period and two treatment periods (AMP and nCPAP) each of four months. Efficacy, side effects, compliance, and preference were evaluated by a questionnaire and home sleep monitoring.
                One patient dropped out early in the study and three refused to cross over so treatment results are presented on the remaining 20 patients. The apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) was lower with nasal CPAP 4.2 (2.2)/hour than with the AMP 13.6 (14.5)/hour (p < 0.01). Eleven of the 20 patients (55%) who used the AMP were treatment successes (reduction of AHI to < 10/hour and relief of symptoms), one (5%) was a compliance failure (unable or unwilling to use the treatment), and eight (40%) were treatment failures (failure to reduce AHI to < 10/hour and/or failure to relieve symptoms). Fourteen of the 20 patients (70%) who used nCPAP were treatment successes, six (30%) were compliance failures, and there were no treatment failures. There was greater patient satisfaction with the AMP (p < 0.01) than with nCPAP but no difference in reported side effects or compliance.
                AMP is an effective treatment in some patients with mild to moderate OSA and is associated with greater patient satisfaction than nCPAP.
We can conclude no implications for practice at this stage. Appropriately designed large-scale randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed to determine the effects of additional bedtime H2RAs in suppressing nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough.