A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter, dose-reduction trial of the minimal effective doses of budesonide and fluticasone dry-powder inhalers in adults with mild to moderate asthma. Time course of action of two inhaled corticosteroids, fluticasone propionate and budesonide. Comparable effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide on the HPA-axis in adult asthmatic patients. Systemic effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide in adult patients with asthma. Comparison of dose-response effects of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide in the management of asthma. Improved safety with equivalent asthma control in adults with chronic severe asthma on high-dose fluticasone propionate. Fluticasone propionate compared with budesonide: a double-blind trial in asthmatic children using powder devices at a dosage of 400 microg x day(-1). A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation. Comparison of budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate for treatment of asthma. Comparison of the systemic effects of fluticasone propionate and budesonide given by dry powder inhaler in healthy and asthmatic subjects. Efficacy and safety of high-dose inhaled steroids in children with asthma: a comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide. High dose fluticasone propionate, 1 mg daily, versus fluticasone propionate, 2 mg daily, or budesonide, 1.6 mg daily, in patients with chronic severe asthma. International Study Group. Safety and efficacy of fluticasone and beclomethasone in moderate to severe asthma. Belgian Multicenter Study Group. Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination therapy 50/250 microg twice daily is more effective than budesonide 800 microg twice daily in treating moderate to severe asthma. The effect of high-dose fluticasone propionate and budesonide on lung function and asthma exacerbations in patients with severe asthma. Effects of inhaled corticosteroids on growth in asthmatic children: a comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide. Potency ratio fluticasone propionate (Flixotide Diskus)/budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler). Comparison of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate on direct and indirect measurements of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with stable asthma. Protection by budesonide and fluticasone on allergen-induced airway responses after discontinuation of therapy. Cost effectiveness of fluticasone and budesonide in patients with moderate asthma. Addition of salmeterol versus doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate in patients with mild to moderate asthma. [A fixed combination of fluticasone and salmeterol permits better control of asthma than a beclomethasone dipropionate and montelukast combination]. Budesonide inhaled via Turbuhaler: a more effective treatment for asthma than beclomethasone dipropionate via Rotahaler. Daily or intermittent budesonide in preschool children with recurrent wheezing. High-dose inhaled steroids in the management of asthma. A comparison of the effects of budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate on pulmonary function, symptoms, bronchial responsiveness and the adrenal function. Comparison of two high dose corticosteroid aerosol treatments, beclomethasone dipropionate (1500 micrograms/day) and budesonide (1600 micrograms/day), for chronic asthma. Twice daily inhalation of a new corticosteroid, budesonide, in the treatment of chronic asthma. Combination therapy with single inhaler budesonide/formoterol compared with high dose of fluticasone propionate alone in patients with moderate persistent asthma. High-dose inhaled budesonide in treatment of severe steroid-dependent asthma. Fluticasone propionate in asthma: a long term dose comparison study. Evaluation of fluticasone propionate (500 micrograms day-1) administered either as dry powder via a Diskhaler inhaler or pressurized inhaler and compared with beclomethasone dipropionate (1000 micrograms day-1) administered by pressurized inhaler. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms/day with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/day in mild and moderate asthma. A randomized, double-blind dose reduction study to compare the minimal effective dose of budesonide Turbuhaler and fluticasone propionate Diskhaler. Therapeutic ratio of inhaled corticosteroids in adult asthma. A dose-range comparison between fluticasone propionate and budesonide, measuring their effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and adrenal cortex function. Improvement of asthma control with beclomethasone extrafine aerosol compared to fluticasone and budesonide. Efficacy and safety of dry powder fluticasone propionate in children with persistent asthma. Comparative efficacy and safety of twice daily fluticasone propionate powder versus placebo in the treatment of moderate asthma. A comparison of multiple doses of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate in subjects with persistent asthma. A comparison of inhaled budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate in childhood asthma. Effectiveness of fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate asthma: a dose-ranging study. Rapid induction of clinical response with a short-term high-dose starting schedule of budesonide nebulizing suspension in young children with recurrent wheezing episodes. The effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate in the treatment of young asthmatic children: a dose comparison study.
Inhaled corticosteroids are established first-line anti-inflammatory treatment for asthma. Clinical trials comparing inhaled corticosteroids must take into consideration that because of their excellent effect at low doses, they typically induce a near-maximal response in asthma patients.
                The aim of the present dose-response study was to estimate the minimal effective doses (MEDs) of budesonide and of fluticasone propionate via dry-powder inhaler in adults with mild to moderate asthma.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter, dose-reduction trial performed in adults to compare these 2 inhaled corticosteroids. After a 4- to 6-week run-in period with beclomethasone dipropionate 2000 pg/d, patients fulfilling defined criteria for asthma control were randomly allocated to treatment with budesonide or fluticasone, both administered BID at a total of 800 pg/d. At 5-week intervals, the dose was reduced to 400 and then 200 pg/d (200 and 100 pg BID) if asthma control was maintained according to further defined criteria. The MED was defined as the last dose level before deterioration of asthma control.
                Subjects were 197 asthmatic patients with a mean age of 40.6 years in the budesonide group and 41.5 years in the fluticasone group. In both groups, baseline mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) was 79.4% of the predicted normal volume and baseline mean FEV(1) reversibility was 22.3%. The median MED for both groups was 400 microg/d, with no detectable difference in dis-tributions. The budesonide-to-fluticasone ratio for the geometric mean MED was 123% (95% CI, 99-153 [not significant]). No statistically significant differences regarding lung function, symptom scores, or rescue medication usage were found between the treatment groups during the first treatment period. Adverse-event profiles were similar in both groups, and no unexpected adverse events were considered to be caused by the study drugs.
                This effect-controlled study did not detect a statistically significant difference between the MEDs for budesonide and fluticasone via dry-powder inhaler in adults with mild to moderate asthma. It is important to be able to compare the efficacy and systemic effects of inhaled corticosteroids but their slow onset of action makes it difficult to measure the maximum response to a given dose. Submaximal responses could be compared if the time course of action of the inhaled corticosteroids being compared was similar. We have compared the time course of action of fluticasone and budesonide, measuring response as change in the provocative dose of adenosine monophosphate causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PD20AMP).
                Eighteen subjects with mild asthma, aged 18-65, took part in a three way randomised crossover study. Subjects took fluticasone (1500 microg/day), budesonide (1600 microg/day), and placebo each for 4 weeks with a washout period of at least 2 weeks between treatments; PD20AMP and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were measured during and after treatment. The time taken to achieve 50% of the maximum response (T50%) was compared as a measure of onset of action.
                There was a progressive increase in PD20AMP during the 4 weeks of treatment with both fluticasone and budesonide but not placebo; the increase after 1 and 4 weeks was 2.28 and 4.50 doubling doses (DD) for fluticasone and 2.49 and 3.65 DD for budesonide. T50% was 9.3 days for fluticasone and 7.5 days for budesonide with a median difference between fluticasone and budesonide of 0.1 days (95% CI -1.4 to 2.65). There was a wide range of response to both inhaled corticosteroids but good correlation between the response to fluticasone and budesonide within subjects. FEV1 and morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) increased during the first week of both active treatments and were stable thereafter. There was a small progressive improvement in nocturnal symptoms with both active treatments.
                PD20AMP was a more sensitive marker of response to inhaled corticosteroid therapy than FEV1 and PEFR. The time course of action of fluticasone and budesonide on PD20AMP is similar, suggesting that comparative studies of their efficacy using 1 or 2 week treatment periods are valid. When a new inhaled corticosteroid becomes available, a pilot study comparing its time course of action with that of an established corticosteroid should allow comparative studies to be performed more efficiently. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre cross-over study compared the effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis of fluticasone propionate (750 microg twice daily given via the Diskus) and budesonide (800 microg twice daily given via the Turbuhaler). Two treatment periods of 2 weeks each were preceded by a 2-week run-in period and separated by a 2-week washout period. During run-in and washout, patients received beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or budesonide at a constant dose of 1500-1600 microg day(-1). Sixty patients aged 18-75 years with moderate to severe asthma not fully controlled by treatment with 1500-1600 microg day(-1) budesonide or BDP entered run-in and 45 completed the study. HPA axis suppression was assessed by morning serum cortisol (area under the curve from 08.00 to 10.30 hours) and 12-h nocturnal urinary cortisol excretion, measured at the end of run-in (baseline 1), at the end of washout (baseline 2), and at the end of each treatment period. Neither budesonide nor fluticasone produced significant suppression of either parameter compared to baselines. Only a few patients had serum-cortisol and urinary cortisol values below the normal range, before and after treatment. This shows that the patients did not have adrenal suppression before entering the study. The ratio between the AUC serum cortisol measured after fluticasone treatment and after budesonide treatment was 0.99 (95% CI 0.92-1.06), indicating equivalent effects on the HPA axis. This result was achieved after having omitted two patients' results, due to their very sensitive reaction to budesonide, but not to fluticasone. Two exacerbations of acute asthma occurred during budesonide treatment and none during fluticasone treatment. Both treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, budesonide 1600 microg day(-1) via Turbuhaler and fluticasone propionate 1500 microg day(-1) via Diskus had no clinical effects on the HPA axis in patients with moderate to severe asthma. We assessed the systemic effects of budesonide (BUD) and fluticasone propionate (FP) in 23 patients with asthma, using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, and cross-over design. The following five treatments were given in a randomized order for 1 wk with a washout period in between of 2 wk: (1) placebo; (2) FP, 200 micrograms twice a day, inhaled from a Diskhaler; (3) FP, 1,000 micrograms twice a day, inhaled from a Diskhaler; (4) BUD, 200 micrograms twice a day, inhaled from a Turbuhaler; and (5) BUD, 800 micrograms twice a day, inhaled from a Turbuhaler. The primary variable was the area under the curve of serum cortisol versus time (AUC0-20), derived from serum samples taken every 2 h over a 20-h period following the last evening dose at 10:00 P.M. The lower doses of BUD and FLU did not cause any adrenal suppression. Compared with placebo, however, FP (1, 000 micrograms, twice daily and BUD (800 micrograms, twice daily) decreased the AUC0-20 by 34 and 16%, respectively. Fluticasone (1,000 micrograms, twice daily) was more suppressive than BUD (800 micrograms, twice daily) (p = 0.0006). The FEV1, measured the morning after the last inhalation, was significantly higher after the active treatments, compared with placebo (p < 0.02), but did not differ between all active treatments. We conclude that high doses of BUD and FP (in particular the latter), inhaled via their respective dry powder inhalers for 1 wk, result in a measurable systemic activity in patients with asthma. The dose-response effects of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) administered b.i.d. with the aid of metered dose aerosols were studied in 128 patients (67 men and 61 women, mean age 53 years) suffering from asthma bronchiale. The study was designed as a multi-centre, double-blind, four-period cross-over study, followed by a single-blind double placebo period. BDP was administered in doses of 400 and 1000 micrograms, and BUD in doses of 400 and 800 micrograms. The results in terms of peak expiratory flow (PEF) in the morning and evening, daily symptoms score and use of inhaled beta 2-agonists did not reveal any clinically significant differences between the drugs or between high (800 micrograms BUD, 1000 micrograms BDP) and low (400 micrograms BUD/BDP) doses. However, statistically significant differences were recorded for the corresponding parameters when comparing the placebo with preceding steroid periods. Adverse effects consisting mainly of oropharyngeal candidiasis, hoarseness and cough occurred in 54 of 468 treatment months (12%). The carry-over effects of inhaled steroids are longer lasting than was previously assumed. High-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have been associated with the same side-effects as oral corticosteroids. Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) in doses greater than 2000 microg/day are used regularly in severe asthma, despite the fact that safety and efficacy data at such high doses are limited. Fluticasone propionate (FP) has been promoted as being twice as potent clinically as BDP or BUD at doses of 2000 microg/day or less with a similar safety profile. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of FP with BDP and BUD in 133 symptomatic adult asthmatics requiring at least 1750 microg/day of BDP or BUD.
                Patients fulfilling the entry criteria were randomized to receive either their regular ICS medication or FP at approximately half the microgram dose for 6 months in an open, parallel group study. The primary efficacy measure was based on morning peak expiratory flow measurements recorded by patients on daily record cards, while determination of safety was based on a number of endpoints including changes in bone turnover indices, the incidence of topical side-effects and assessments of quality of life.
                It was shown that patients who were switched to FP, but not those continuing with BDP or BUD, had significant increases in levels of morning serum cortisol and the urine cortisol:creatinine ratio while maintaining asthma control. Serum osteocalcin and the pyridinoline:creatinine ratio, as well as the deoxypyridinoline:creatinine ratio, were also shown to increase only in the FP group. Subjective assessments such as quality of life score, the incidence and ease of bruising, and reports of hoarseness also favoured the FP group.
                It is concluded that, at the doses studied and with the delivery devices used clinically, FP is at least as effective as BDP/BUD in the management of severe asthma and may offer clinical advantages with respect to steroid-related adverse effects. The aim of this study was to compare fluticasone propionate (FP) with budesonide (BUD) at a dose of 400 microg x day(-1) in the treatment of children with asthma. Two hundred and twenty nine children with mild-to-moderate asthma, currently receiving 200-400 microg x day(-1) of inhaled corticosteroid, were randomized to receive either 400 microg x day(-1) of FP from the Diskhaler (registered trade mark of the Glaxo Group of Companies) or 400 microg x day(-1) of BUD from the Turbuhaler (registered trade mark of Astra Pharmaceuticals Ltd) for 8 weeks, in a parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy study. Primary efficacy was assessed by measurement of daily peak expiratory flow (PEF). In addition, pulmonary function tests were performed at each clinic visit and a self-administered patient-centred questionnaire was completed by one parent of each patient at the start and end of study treatment. Mean morning PEF increased following treatment both with FP and BUD, but was significantly higher following treatment with FP during Weeks 1-4 (p=0.015) and Weeks 1-8 (p=0.019). Similar results were found for mean evening PEF and percentage predicted morning and evening PEF. Children receiving FP experienced significantly less disruption in their physical activities (i.e. sports, games) because of their asthma compared to children treated with BUD (p=0.03). Mean cortisol levels increased in both groups, but the increase was significantly higher in the FP group at 4 weeks (p=0.022). Serum and urine markers of bone formation and resorption changed very little and showed no consistent pattern of change. Fluticasone propionate at a dosage of 400 microg x day(-1) from the Diskhaler provided a more rapid and greater improvement in lung function in children with mild-to-moderate asthma than BUD 400 microg day(-1) from the Turbuhaler. Both treatments were well-tolerated, with a similar safety profile. In Vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that there are detectable differences between inhaled corticosteroids commonly used to treat asthma. However, controversy still remains as to whether these differences translate into clinical benefits. This 12-week, international, randomized, doubleblind, parallel-group study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) 800 mug daily, administered as a powder via the Diskhaler((R)), and budesonide (BUD) 1600 mug daily, administered using the Turbuhaler((R)), in adult patients with moderate-tosevere asthma. A total of 518 patients participated in the study, 256 of whom received FP and 262 BUD. Assessment of mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the 12-week treatment period revealed a statistically significant difference in efficacy between FP 800 mug daily and BUD 1600 mug daily in favour of FP (p = 0.003), with an overall improvement of 20.9 l/min with FP compared with 12.4 l/min on BUD. Statistically significant differences in favour of FP were seen over the 12 weeks for mean evening PEF (p = 0.04), diurnal PEF variation (p = 0.03) and percentage predicted PEF (p = 0.003), as well as forced expiratory volume (p = 0.008), forced vital capacity (p = 0.02) and PEF (p = 0.005) measured at clinic visits. The median percentage of symptom-free nights increased over the 12-week study period in both treatment groups, with similar changes seen for the median percentage of days with symptom score < 2, rescue medication use and exacerbations of asthma. The incidence of adverse events was found to be comparable in the two treatment groups. The geometric mean ratios of serum cortisol levels were found to be 1.03 for FP, indicating no mean hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression from baseline, and 0.93 for BUD (p = 0.0002 compared with FP). In summary, FP 800 mug daily showed a greater efficacy/safety ratio in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma than BUD 1600 mug daily. Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) were each given in a dose of 200 micrograms twice daily by metered dose inhaler to 10 asthmatic children already dependent on treatment with steroids. In a double blind randomised crossover study each course lasted one month. No clinically important differences were found between the two treatments when symptom scores, symptom free days, additional use of salbutamol, and results of lung function tests were considered. Metyrapone mildly reduced the plasma concentration of 11-deoxycortisol in two patients during treatment with budesonide, and in four during treatment with beclomethasone. It is concluded that although they are usually safe, both drugs may cause mild adrenal suppression when given in a dose of 200 micrograms twice daily. The potential for long term adverse effects from inhaled corticosteroids relates to their systemic absorption, usually assessed from proxy markers in short term studies. When fluticasone propionate and budesonide have been compared in this way the results have been inconsistent. To determine whether this is because of the subjects studied or the sensitivity of the systemic marker used, we have compared the effects of fluticasone propionate and budesonide in healthy and asthmatic subjects and investigated the effect of treatment on three systemic markers.
                Forty six healthy subjects were randomised to receive inhaled fluticasone propionate 1500 microg/day (via an Accuhaler), budesonide 1600 microg/day (via a Turbuhaler), or placebo; 31 subjects with moderately severe asthma were randomised to receive the same doses of fluticasone propionate or budesonide but not placebo. Systemic effects in healthy and asthmatic subjects were compared after 7 days. Treatment was continued for another 21 days in the subjects with asthma when systemic effects and asthma control were assessed.
                At baseline healthy subjects had higher urinary levels of total cortisol metabolites (TCM) than subjects with asthma. After 7 days of treatment with fluticasone propionate urinary TCM levels in the healthy subjects were significantly lower than in the subjects with asthma (mean difference between groups 1663 microg/day, 95% CI 328 to 2938). This was not the case with budesonide, however, where urinary TCM levels in the healthy subjects remained above those in the asthmatic subjects (mean difference between groups 1210 microg/day, 95% CI -484 to 2904). Urinary TCM levels were considerably more sensitive to the effects of inhaled corticosteroids than morning serum cortisol or osteocalcin concentrations. Only budesonide reduced the serum level of osteocalcin.
                When given by dry powder inhaler for 7 days, fluticasone propionate 1500 microg/day has a greater effect on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in healthy subjects than in subjects with asthma, but this is not the case for budesonide 1600 microg/day. These findings, together with the differences in sensitivity between systemic markers, explain many of the discrepancies in the literature. To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP), 400 microgram/d, with those of budesonide (BUD), 800 microgram/d, in children with moderate to severe asthma.
                Three hundred thirty-three children, ages 4 to 12 years, receiving inhaled corticosteroids were enrolled in a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group study. After a 2-week run-in phase, 166 children received FP and 167 received BUD for 20 weeks. The primary outcome variable was mean morning peak expiratory flow; the 2 treatments were to be regarded as equivalent if the 90% CI for the treatment difference was within +/- 15 L/min. Pulmonary function, height, and diary cards were assessed at each visit; and morning serum cortisol levels were determined before and after treatment.
                Baseline peak expiratory flow was similar, FP 236 +/- 72 (SD) L/min and BUD 229 +/- 74, increasing after treatment to 277 +/- 41 and 257 +/- 28, a difference between treatments of 12 L/min (90% CI 6-19 L/min; P =.002). Symptom control and use of rescue medication were the same. Cortisol levels after treatment were 199 nmol/L (FP) and 183 nmol/L (BUD) (treatment ratio = 1.09; 90% CI 0.98-1.21; P =.172). Linear growth was less in those receiving BUD (mean difference, 6.2 mm; 95% CI 2.9-9.6; P =.0003).
                FP at half the dose was superior to BUD in improving peak expiratory flow and comparable in controlling symptoms. Growth was reduced with BUD compared with FP, but there was no difference in serum cortisol suppression or hepatic or renal function. Airway inflammation is now regarded as fundamental in the pathogenesis of asthma and treatment with inhaled corticosteroids has proved effective. There is a need for drugs in this category with higher topical potency but fewer side-effects than those presently available. A double-blind, parallel group study was conducted in 671 patients with severe asthma (already taking between 0.8-2.0 mg of inhaled corticosteroid daily) to compare the safety and efficacy of 6 weeks of treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP), 1 mg daily, to fluticasone propionate, 2 mg daily, and budesonide (BUD), 1.6 mg daily, delivered via a metered-dose inhaler. Peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and usage of rescue medication were recorded daily by the patient. At each clinic visit (-2, 0, 3 and 6 weeks) morning serum cortisol levels, bone markers and spirometry were assessed. The changes in mean morning PEF from baseline (weeks 1-6) were: FP 2 mg daily +24 l.min-1; FP 1 mg daily +21 l.min-1; BUD 1.6 mg daily +13 l.min-1. A similar rank order for the three treatments was seen for evening PEF, clinic spirometry, reduction of diurnal PEF variation, symptom scores, and requirement for rescue bronchodilators. The mean serum cortisol levels remained well within the normal range in all three groups. Analysis of the geometric mean cortisol ratio (treatment/baseline ratio after 6 weeks treatment) showed a changed rank order, the values being: FP 1 mg daily 1.04; BUD 1.6 mg daily 0.97; FP 2 mg daily 0.88.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) There are still some concerns about the safety of high doses of inhaled glucocorticosteroids (ICS). We compared the safety and efficacy of fluticasone propionate (FP) and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in 306 patients with moderate to severe asthma in a double-blind, multicenter, cross-over study of 12 mo duration. During the 1-mo run-in period, bronchodilators were replaced by salmeterol 50 microg twice daily, increasing morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) by 28 L/min (p < 0.001) and FEV1 by 6.2% predicted (p < 0.001). At randomization the current ICS was replaced by 500 microg BDP or 250 microg FP in accordance with previously taken 500 microg BDP or 400 microg budesonide (BUD). No significant differences between the two treatments regarding morning plasma cortisol, urinary excretion of calcium and hydroxyproline, FEV1, and PEFR were observed at any time point during the study. Osteocalcin and bone mineral density (BMD) were improved over baseline in the FP group, resulting in higher serum osteocalcin levels (mean difference 0.28 ng/ml; p < 0.001) and higher BMD in the spine (1.0%; p = 0.05), femoral neck (1.6; p < 0.01), and Ward's triangle (3.6%; p = 0.01) as compared with BDP. We conclude that chronic treatment with FP, at half the dose of BDP, results in a similar antiasthma effect but a more favorable safety profile with respect to bone metabolism and mineral density. Three hundred and fifty-three asthmatic patients who remained symptomatic despite treatment with budesonide 800-1200 microg day(-1) (or equivalent) were randomized to a new combination therapy comprising salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone propionate 250 microg (Seretide, Advair, Viani 50/250 microg) twice daily or budesonide 800 microg twice daily for 24 weeks. Patients kept daily records of their morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), daytime and night-time symptom scores and daytime and night-time use of rescue salbutamol. Mean morning PEF increased by 451 min(-1) (baseline 361 l min(-1)) in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC) group and by 19 l min(-1) (baseline 358 l min(-1)) in the budesonide group over the 24 weeks. The adjusted mean morning PEF over weeks 1 to 24 was significantly greater in the SFC group, despite the > three-fold lower corticosteroid dose (406 vs. 380 l min(-1); P < 0.001). A significantly greater improvement in evening PEF was also seen in the SFC group (adjusted mean 416 vs. 398 l min(-1); P<0.001). SFC also provided significantly better control of daytime symptoms and a significantly greater reduction in the requirement for rescue salbutamol compared with budesonide. These results demonstrate that SFC 50/250 microg twice daily is superior to budesonide 800 microg twice daily in the management of patients with moderate to severe asthma who are symptomatic on their existing dose of corticosteroid. The purpose of this study was to investigate the comparative efficacy and safety of equal doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) and inhaled budesonide (BUD) using their respective dry powder inhalers in a population of severe asthmatics requiring high doses of inhaled corticosteroid. This double-blind double-dummy parallel-group study compared the effects of 24 weeks of treatment with FP (2000 micrograms daily via a Diskhaler inhaler; Glaxo Wellcome, Evreux, France) and BUD (2000 micrograms daily via a Turbuhaler inhaler; Astra Pharmaceuticals, Rijswijka, Netherlands) on lung function and asthma exacerbations in 395 patients with asthma. FP was statistically significantly superior to BUD with respect to the percentage of symptom-free days (P = 0.02), the incidence of days free from rescue bronchodilator usage (P = 0.02) and the distribution of change in peak expiratory flow (PEF) expressed as a percentage of the predicted PEF (P = 0.04). During the treatment period FP was statistically significantly superior to BUD for change in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) at 8, 16 and 24 weeks, change in the median daytime symptom score during weeks 5-16, for incidence of symptom-free days and incidence of days free from rescue bronchodilator usage during weeks 17-24. There was no significant difference between FP and BUD with respect to the number of patients experiencing one or more asthma exacerbation (33.8 and 28.4% of patients, respectively). There was, however, evidence that the exacerbations were clinically less severe in patients treated with FP, in that the time to resolution was quicker (11.0 vs. 14.7 days; P = 0.035), mean duration of all exacerbations (for an individual patient) tended to be shorter (18.5 vs. 23.6 days; P = 0.12), the time off work was reduced (4.2 vs. 7.6 days; P = 0.012) and the lowest PEF recorded during the exacerbation was higher (301 vs. 263 l min-1; P = 0.07). There were no clinically relevant differences in the safety (serum cortisol levels, markers of bone turnover, adverse events) of FP and BUD at these microgram equivalent doses. The patients recruited into this study, in retrospect, probably had no need for such high doses of inhaled corticosteroid but, irrespective of this, FP at microgram equivalent doses showed evidence of superior efficacy to BUD with respect to lung function and severity of asthma exacerbations without producing any greater adverse systemic effect. In asthmatic children inhaled corticosteroids are widely used. However, there are some concerns about the systemic adverse effects of these drugs, especially in the growing child. We performed this prospective study in order to compare the effects of 400 microg/day of budesonide (BUD) and 250 microg/day of fluticasone propionate (FP) on growth in prepubertal (aged 4-11.5 years), moderate persisting asthmatic children. One hundred patients (51 boys and 49 girls), who were randomized into two groups, were recruited for the study. The first group was treated with BUD, 2X 200 microg/day, and the second group was treated with FP, 2X 125 microg/day, by using a medium-size volume-spacer metered-dose inhaler. Growth in children with asthma who were treated by inhaled corticosteroids was calculated by growth velocity over a 12-month period. Comparisons between treatment groups were calculated by t-test and chi-square test. There were no significant differences between BUD and FP groups for sex, age, first height, and growth velocity. Moderate persisting, prepubertal asthmatic children treated with 250 microg/day of FP appeared to have no different linear growth than those children who received 400 microg/day of BUD. In the choice of, or switch between, various inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) it is important to know equipotent doses for clinical treatment effects of the alternatives. Various ICS do have different inherent potency. Further, the ICS are delivered from inhalers that may differ markedly in output characteristics and drug delivery to intrapulmonary airways. Therefore, clinical efficacy comparisons must include drug-inhaler comparisons. We estimated the therapeutic potency ratio of the Flixotide Diskus (fluticasone propionate, FP) and the Pulmicort Turbuhaler (budesonide, BUD) in steroid-naive asthma patients, using a dose-reduction technique (FP 500-0 mcg/day, BUD 800-0 mcg/day). The dose defining end point was loss of asthma control in this paper denoted as exacerbation. In total, 282 patients with proven asthma were enrolled in the study, and 103 in the FP group and 98 in the BUD group completed the study per protocol. In total, 80 patients in the FP-group and 79 in the BUD-group experienced a dose defining exacerbation. The exacerbation frequency increased in a dose-dependent way as the dose was titrated down. From these data the potency difference between the present drug inhaler combinations, Flixotide Diskus and Pulmicort Turbuhaler, was calculated to be between 1.50:1 (95% CI 1.10:1-2.05:1) and 1.75:1 (CI 1.26:1-2.43:1) depending on if patients with insufficient steroid-response were excluded from the calculations or not. In these steroid-naïve patients, the potency difference was evident only at low daily doses, below 200 mcg. Fluticasone propionate is a new inhaled corticosteroid with a 2:1 efficacy ratio compared with beclomethasone dipropionate with regard to lung function and symptom scores, without increased systemic activity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this was also the case for bronchial hyperresponsiveness, assessed by both a direct (histamine) and an indirect (ultrasonically nebulised distilled water (UNDW)) provocation test.
                Fluticasone propionate, 750 micrograms/day, and beclomethasone dipropionate, 1500 micrograms/day, were compared in a randomised, double blind, crossover study consisting of two six week treatment periods, each preceded by a three week single blind placebo period. Twenty one non-smoking asthmatics (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 74.7% predicted, mean PC20histamine 0.36 mg/ml) completed the study.
                Fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate improved FEV1, peak flow rates, asthma symptoms, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to the same extent. Both fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate caused an increase in PC20histamine (mean 2.29 [95% confidence interval 1.45 to 3.13] and 1.95 [1.07 to 2.84] doubling doses, respectively) and in PD20UNDW (1.12 [0.55 to 1.70] and 1.28 [0.88 to 1.70] doubling doses, respectively). Neither treatment changed morning serum cortisol levels, but fluticasone propionate decreased the number of peripheral blood eosinophils less than beclomethasone dipropionate, indicating smaller systemic effects of fluticasone propionate.
                These findings show that fluticasone propionate is as effective as twice the dose of beclomethasone dipropionate on bronchial hyperresponsiveness, assessed by provocation with both histamine and UNDW, without increased systemic activity. Treatment with inhaled steroids is an effective method of reducing bronchoconstriction and airway inflammation after allergen challenge. However, the duration of the protective effects of inhaled steroids after discontinuation of therapy has not been established.
                We sought to evaluate the protective effect of 1 week of inhaled steroid therapy against inhaled allergen challenge 12 hours after discontinuation of therapy.
                In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, 26 asthmatic subjects (>18 years old) not using inhaled steroids were administered 200 microg of budesonide twice daily, 200 microg of fluticasone twice daily, or placebo twice daily for 1 week. Twelve hours after discontinuation of therapy, subjects were administered an inhaled allergen challenge. Each treatment period was separated by a 3-week washout period.
                When compared with placebo (26% +/- 14%), there was a slight but significant protection against the allergen-induced early response after fluticasone treatment (19% +/- 10%, P = .001) but not after budesonide treatment (23% +/- 13%, P = .08). However, when the area under the curve for the early airway response was examined, there was no difference between the 2 drugs in the amount of protection ( P = .62). Partial protection was demonstrated against the late-response allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia with both treatments ( P = .001). By contrast, no protection was observed against allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness for either treatment.
                The protective effects of inhaled steroids against allergen-induced early responses, airway eosinophilia, and allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness are partially or completely lost as early as 12 hours after discontinuation of therapy. The objective of this study was to assess the relative cost effectiveness of fluticasone via metered dose inhaler and budesonide via Turbuhaler((R)) in corticosteroid-naive patients with moderate asthma from a third-party payer perspective (German Sickness Funds).
                A retrospective economic assessment of direct medication costs of treatment was performed on data from a prospective, randomised, parallel group, 6-week clinical trial. 457 corticosteroid-naive patients between the ages of 18 and 70 years with moderate asthma were included in the intention-to-treat analysis.
                The fluticasone group had a higher proportion of successfully treated patients (those with a peak expiratory flow rate improvement of >/=10%) [47 vs 42%], a higher average proportion of symptom-free days (40 vs 34%) and lower direct healthcare costs [1997 Deutschmarks (DM)] per day (DM4.23 vs DM5.19) than the budesonide group. Therefore, the daily costs per successfully treated patient (DM9.00 vs DM12.36) and the cost per symptom-free day (DM10.58 vs DM15.26) were both lower with fluticasone than with budesonide. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that these results were relatively robust over a wide range of plausible assumptions.
                These results showed that from the perspective of a third-party payer, fluticasone was more cost effective than budesonide over the 6-week study period. The objective of this multicentre, randomised, double blind, parallel group study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the addition of salmeterol with that of doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate in asthmatic patients not controlled by a low or intermediate dose of inhaled corticosteroids.
                After a four week run in period of treatment with fluticasone propionate (100 micrograms twice daily if pre-trial dose was 400-600 micrograms inhaled corticosteroids or 250 micrograms twice daily if pre-trial dose was 800-1200 micrograms inhaled corticosteroids), 274 patients were randomised to treatment for 12 weeks with either salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily plus the run in dose of fluticasone propionate or twice the run in dose of fluticasone propionate (200 or 500 micrograms twice daily). Outcome measures were daily records of peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom scores, and clinic lung function.
                The improvements in both the morning and evening PEF were better in the salmeterol than in the fluticasone propionate group, the mean increase in morning PEF being 19 l/min higher (95% CI 11.0 to 26.1) and in evening PEF being 16 l/min (95% CI 18.4 to 24.0) higher in the salmeterol group. The increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 0.09 1 greater in the salmeterol group than in the fluticasone propionate group after four weeks of treatment (95% CI 0.01 to 0.18), but not after 12 weeks. Both regimens showed an increase in symptom free days and a reduction in the need for rescue salbutamol both during the day and the night, but these improvements were greater in the salmeterol group. There were no significant differences between the groups in adverse effects or in the number of rescue course of oral corticosteroids.
                In this group of patients still symptomatic despite 100 or 250 micrograms fluticasone propionate twice daily, the addition of salmetterol caused a greater improvement in lung function and symptom control than doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate. It is now recommended to add an inhaled long-acting beta 2-agonist, or as an alternative, to add a leukotriene-antagonist, in patients whose asthma is insufficiently controlled with an inhaled corticosteroid alone. A randomised, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study was carried out in 246 patients of at least 15 years, whose asthma was not adequately controlled with a medium dose of an inhaled corticosteroid. They received either fluticasone/salmeterol combination 250/50 micrograms one inhalation twice daily or CFC beclomethasone dipropionate 250 micrograms two puffs twice daily plus montelukast 10 mg in the evening for 12 weeks. The mean morning PEFR (main criterion) was significantly (p = 0.017) more improved with fluticasone/salmeterol (+44.2 L/min) than with beclomethasone dipropionate plus montelukast (+31.0 L/min). Other outcomes showed significantly better improvements (p 0.022 Pound) with fluticasone/salmeterol than with beclomethasone plus montelukast. The two treatments were well tolerated. Fluticasone/salmeterol provided a better asthma control than beclomethasone dipropionate plus montelukast in patients insufficiently controlled with an inhaled corticosteroid alone. Chlorofluorocarbon-propelled metered dose inhalers are facing a worldwide ban. Dry powder inhalers have been developed for the agents used in treatment of asthma.
                Our objective was to compare the effects of two inhaled glucocorticosteroids in dry power inhalers: budesonide (delivered via Turbuhaler) and beclomethasone dipropionate (delivered via Rotahaler).
                A randomized, crossover study with two steroid-treatment periods of 8 weeks. At the end of the study, the treatment with the inhaled steroid was stopped for 4 weeks. Sixteen adult patients with moderately severe asthma participated. Before the study all patients were treated with an inhaled steroid in a median dose of 0.60 mg/day (range 0.15-0.80); during the study they received 0.20 mg twice daily. Peak expiratory flow rate was measured twice daily at home throughout the study, lung function was assessed every fourth week and airway responsiveness was measured before and after each period. Preference concerning efficacy and inhaler type was assessed at the end of the study.
                Twelve patients completed the study. Lung function, airway responsiveness, and symptoms deteriorated significantly in the steroid-free washout period; this period had to be shortened in 5/12 patients. Mean morning peak expiratory flow was significantly higher during budesonide treatment than during beclomethasone dipropionate treatment, the difference being 17 L/min (95% C.I.: 2-32 L/min, P = .026). Airway responsiveness improved 1.1 doubling concentrations after budesonide treatment, but decreased 0.3 doubling concentrations after beclomethasone dipropionate treatment. The difference between the values after budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate treatment was 1.4 doubling concentrations (95% C.I.: 0.4-2.4 doubling concentrations, P = .033). Forced expiratory flow in one second improved slightly more during budesonide than during beclomethasone treatment. The difference was 4.3% predicted (95% C.I.: -0.7-9.3%). Most patients reported budesonide Turbuhaler to be more effective (10 versus 0) and easier to use (11 versus 1) than beclomethasone dipropionate Rotahaler.
                As a consequence of the difference in local potency of the steroids and the fact that Turbuhaler deposits more drug particles in the lung than Rotahaler, budesonide inhaled via Turbuhaler appeared to be a more effective steroid formulation than beclomethasone dipropionate inhaled via Rotahaler. Daily inhaled glucocorticoids are recommended for young children at risk for asthma exacerbations, as indicated by a positive value on the modified asthma predictive index (API) and an exacerbation in the preceding year, but concern remains about daily adherence and effects on growth. We compared daily therapy with intermittent therapy.
                We studied 278 children between the ages of 12 and 53 months who had positive values on the modified API, recurrent wheezing episodes, and at least one exacerbation in the previous year but a low degree of impairment. Children were randomly assigned to receive a budesonide inhalation suspension for 1 year as either an intermittent high-dose regimen (1 mg twice daily for 7 days, starting early during a predefined respiratory tract illness) or a daily low-dose regimen (0.5 mg nightly) with corresponding placebos. The primary outcome was the frequency of exacerbations requiring oral glucocorticoid therapy.
                The daily regimen of budesonide did not differ significantly from the intermittent regimen with respect to the frequency of exacerbations, with a rate per patient-year for the daily regimen of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.22) versus a rate of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.20) for the intermittent regimen (relative rate in the intermittent-regimen group, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.35; P=0.60). There were also no significant between-group differences in several other measures of asthma severity, including the time to the first exacerbation, or adverse events. The mean exposure to budesonide was 104 mg less with the intermittent regimen than with the daily regimen.
                A daily low-dose regimen of budesonide was not superior to an intermittent high-dose regimen in reducing asthma exacerbations. Daily administration led to greater exposure to the drug at 1 year. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; MIST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00675584.). The efficacy of budesonide (800 micrograms b.d.) and beclomethasone dipropionate (750 micrograms b.d.) in controlling the symptoms of asthma, pulmonary function, bronchial responsiveness to histamine, and adrenal function, was assessed in a double-blind, double-dummy cross-over study of 36 adult chronic asthmatic patients. The patients, the majority of whom were assessed to be affected to a severe degree, were insufficiently controlled in their current regimen of inhaled steroids and/or inhaled and oral bronchodilators. A 2 weeks baseline period preceded 6 weeks of treatment with each of the study drugs. Both treatment groups showed improvements from baseline in clinical assessment of lung function carried out after the first 6 weeks of treatment. No significant differences were seen throughout the entire 12 weeks study, when comparing the effects of the treatments on FEV1, FVC, PEF or the histamine PC20. Asthma severity, symptom score and inhaled bronchodilator use showed the same results after both treatments. It is concluded that inhalations of budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate in high doses are equally potent in the treatment of severe asthma. There is no significant influence on the adrenal function and no significant side effects during a period equal to that of the present study. Twenty eight patients with chronic asthma took part in a double blind single crossover controlled trial of inhaled budesonide and inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate, using high doses of 1600 micrograms and 1500 micrograms daily respectively. Both drugs were administered by pressurised aerosol inhaler; the inhaler containing budesonide and its matching placebo were fitted with a collapsible spacer device. There was no significant difference in the control of asthma during the two six week treatment periods. There was no significant difference in FEV1 and forced vital capacity after four and six weeks of treatment or in mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates for the last 21 days of treatment. There was a small but statistically significant reduction in the daytime wheeze score while they were taking high dose budesonide but there was no difference for daytime activity, cough, and night symptoms. The mean basal cortisol concentrations were significantly lower after six weeks of high dose treatment than before treatment (budesonide p less than 0.01, beclomethasone p less than 0.05). There was no difference between mean basal cortisol values after six weeks of high dose treatment, and there was no effect on the rise of cortisol obtained after a short tetracosactrin test. High dose inhaled corticosteroids produced few side effects and were well tolerated. The efficacy and side-effects of a new corticosteroid, budesonide, was assessed by comparison with beclomethasone dipropionate in double-blind, cross-over study of 30 patients with chronic asthma. The treatment regimens were budesonide 200 micrograms twice daily by conventional pressurized aerosol with a tube spacer attached and beclomethasone 100 micrograms four times daily via a conventional inhaler. Each treatment was given for four weeks. Results were analyzed using Student's t-test for paired comparisons. No significant differences were found for morning and evening peak flow rates, symptom scores, bronchodilator inhaler usage or forced vital capacity. Forced expiratory volume in one second after 4 weeks on each treatment was significantly higher following budesonide therapy (p less than 0.05), but the absolute changes were small and unlikely to be of clinical relevance. There were no major side-effects during either treatment period, but compared with pre-treatment levels serum creatinine and lactic dehydrogenase levels rose significantly during treatment with budesonide (p less than 0.01 and p less than 0.05 respectively). None of these results reflected clinically important biochemical or haematological changes. There was a significant reduction in neutrophil counts following treatment with beclomethasone (p less than 0.05). In the short term treatment of chronic asthma, budesonide administered twice daily is as effective as four times daily beclomethasone. A twice daily dosage regimen should improve patient compliance with therapy. The efficacy and safety of Symbicort (budesonide and formoterol in a single inhaler) were compared with those of a high dose of the commonly used corticosteroid fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate persistent asthma.
                This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study involved 373 patients with asthma (mean age 42 years; FEV(1) 78% of predicted; reversibility 21%). After a 2-week run-in period, during which patients received budesonide 200 microg twice daily, they were randomly assigned to treatment with either Symbicort Turbuhaler (budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg, one inhalation twice daily) or Flovent/Flixotide Diskus (fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily) for 12 weeks.
                Significantly greater increases in morning PEF, the primary efficacy variable, were observed in patients treated with budesonide/formoterol compared with fluticasone propionate (27.4 L/min vs 7.7 L/min; p < 0.001). Evening PEF and clinic FEV(1) also favored budesonide/formoterol compared with fluticasone propionate (p < 0.001), as did use of reliever medication (p = 0.04) and the proportion of reliever-free days (p < 0.001). There were also numerical improvements in symptom-free days (60.4% vs 55.5%), night-time awakenings (7.9% vs 9.6%) and asthma-control days (57.8% vs 52.4%) in favor of budesonide/formoterol. The risk of an exacerbation was reduced by 32% in the budesonide/formoterol group compared with the fluticasone propionate group (p < 0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated.
                Symbicort (budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler) was more effective than a high dose of fluticasone propionate in improving lung function, reducing use of reliever medication and improving control of moderate persistent asthma. Forty-five steroid-dependent asthmatic outpatients were treated twice daily for 51 weeks with a new inhalation steroid, budesonide (BUD), using a 750 ml spacer. During the initial 15 weeks the prednisone-sparing effects of a high daily dose (1600 micrograms) and a conventional dose (400 micrograms per day) were compared in a double-blind randomized trial including 50 patients. During the remaining 36 weeks 45 patients were treated openly with 1600 micrograms daily. All patients used other antiasthmatic drugs which were maintained throughout the study, except for inhalations of beta-2 agonists that could be used whenever needed. All patients but 2 were able to reduce the daily dose of oral prednisone. The mean daily dose decreased from 13.9 mg to 5.3 mg. Eighteen patients (40%) were able to discontinue oral prednisone. Adrenal gland function improved considerably as prednisone intake decreased. Oropharyngeal thrush frequency showed no change. No severe side effects were observed. Few dose ranging studies have investigated optimal dosing with inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma.
                To compare the efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate 100 or 200 microg twice daily in children with moderate to severe asthma for one year.
                One year, randomised, double blind, parallel group, multicentre study. Children aged 4-11 years (n = 528) with moderate to severe asthma who had previously received high dose inhaled corticosteroids were given fluticasone propionate 100 or 200 microg twice daily for the 52 week treatment period. Efficacy (exacerbations, lung function, and symptoms) and tolerability (adverse events and cortisol levels) were measured.
                There was a non-significant decreased risk of experiencing an exacerbation at any time with fluticasone propionate 200 microg twice daily compared with fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily. This difference reached significance among patients with more severe asthma (defined by previous inhaled corticosteroid dose >800 microg/day). Daily record card morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) in the total population improved significantly more with the higher dose of fluticasone propionate (between group difference, weeks 1-52: 11.4 l/min). Clinic visit mean PEF improved from baseline with both doses, but the response was significantly greater with the higher dose (between group difference, week 52: 17.8 l/min). Both doses were equally well tolerated and overnight urinary cortisol concentrations were unchanged or slightly increased during treatment with either dose.
                This long term dose comparison study shows that treatment with fluticasone propionate 200 micro g twice daily may offer benefits over a lower dose, particularly in children with more severe asthma. Five hundred and eighty-five patients with moderate asthma, currently receiving 400-1000 micrograms day-1 of an inhaled corticosteroid, were treated for 6 weeks in a double-blind, randomized, parallel group study with either 500 micrograms day-1 fluticasone propionate as a dry powder via a Diskhaler inhaler, 500 micrograms day-1 fluticasone propionate via a pressurized inhaler or 1000 micrograms day-1 beclomethasone dipropionate via a pressurized inhaler. For all three treatment groups, mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs) increased within 1 week of the start of treatment. There were also improvements in clinic lung function, daytime and night-time asthma symptoms and a reduction in daytime and night-time rescue bronchodilator medication in all three groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the two formulations of fluticasone propionate in any of the efficacy parameters. Fluticasone propionate via the Diskhaler was significantly more effective than beclomethasone dipropionate over the 6 week study period in reducing diurnal variation (mean difference--4 l min-1, 95% CI--8 to 0 l min-1: P = 0.03). Fluticasone propionate via the Diskhaler produced a statistically significant improvement in night-time symptoms when compared to beclomethasone dipropionate whereas, beclomethasone dipropionate 1000 micrograms day-1 was statistically significantly more effective than both formulations of fluticasone propionate in improving daytime symptoms (P < 0.05). However, these statistical differences must be viewed together with the fact that very few patients recorded a score of 2 or more for both daytime or night-time symptoms. There was a similarly low incidence of adverse events with all three treatments with no evidence of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA)-axis suppression. The results of the 6-week comparative study showed that 500 micrograms day-1 fluticasone propionate whether administered via pressurized inhaler or Diskhaler is as effective and as safe as 1000 micrograms day-1 beclomethasone dipropionate administered via a pressurized inhaler in the treatment of moderate asthma. Over 12 months fluticasone propionate 500 micrograms day-1 via a pressurized inhaler was at least as effective and as well tolerated as beclomethasone dipropionate 1000 micrograms day-1. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of a new inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate at a total daily dose of 200 micrograms, with beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/day in childhood asthma. A total of 398 asthmatic children (aged 4-19 years) were randomised to receive either fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms daily or beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms daily for six weeks inhaled via a spacer device from a metered dose inhaler. During the study the patients recorded morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), symptom scores, and use of beta 2 agonist rescue medication. In addition, clinic visit PEFR and forced expiratory volume in one second were measured. Safety was assessed by recording all adverse events and by performing routine biochemistry and haematology screens including plasma cortisol concentration before and after treatment. For the purposes of analysis the diary card data were grouped into three periods: week 3 (days 15-21), week 6 (days 36-42), and weeks 1-6 (days 1-42). The results showed no significant difference between treatments on most efficacy parameters. However, there were significant differences in changes from baseline in favour of fluticasone propionate for % predicted morning PEFR both at week 3 (fluticasone propionate 6.1%, beclomethasone dipropionate 3.9%) and at week 6 (fluticasone propionate 8.3%, beclomethasone dipropionate 5. 9%) and % predicted evening PEFR at week 6 (fluticasone propionate 7.3%, beclomethasone dipropionate 4.9% and over weeks 1-6 (fluticasone propionate 5.5%, beclomethasone dipropionate 3.6%. Comparison between groups showed that the group receiving fluticasone propionate had a lower % of days with symptom-free exercise at week 6 (fluticasone propionate 87%, beclomethasone dipropionate 81%) and % days without rescue medication at week 6 (fluticasone propionate 87%, beclomethasone dipropionate 80%) and over weeks 1-6 (fluticasone propionate 80%, beclomethasone dipropionate 73%). Except for a higher incidence of sore throat in the fluticasone propionate group, the two treatments did not differ with regard to safety. There was no evidence of adrenal suppression with either treatment. In conclusion, fluticasone propionate 200 microgram daily ws at least as effective and as well tolerated as beclomethasone dipropionate 400 microgram daily in childhood asthma. New inhaled glucocorticosteroids and inhalers are being developed. Their clinical equipotency is difficult to assess and is often discussed.
                This study was carried out to compare the effect of budesonide Turbuhaler and fluticasone propionate (FP) Diskhaler in a dose reduction study in children (ages 5 to 16 years) with asthma.
                Children treated with budesonide administered through a pressurized metered-dose inhaler with a large volume spacer had their budesonide dose gradually reduced to define the minimal effective dose with this delivery system. After this period, 217 children were randomly allocated to treatment with half the dose of either budesonide Turbukaler or FP Diskhaler for 5 weeks in a double-blind trial. If no deterioration in asthma control was seen, the dose was further reduced by 50% at 5-week intervals until deterioration in asthma control was seen. Throughout the study, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, symptoms, and use of rescue beta 2-agonist were recorded in diaries. Lung function tests and a standardized exercise test were performed at the clinic at the end of each treatment period. Urine cortisol excretion (24 hours) was measured before and after the first 5-week treatment period. Standardized criteria for deterioration in asthma control, based on diary card variables and exercise testing, were used to determine the minimal effective dose for each patient; and from this, the number of dose reduction steps was calculated.
                No statistically significant difference was seen in number of dose reduction steps from baseline or in minimal effective dose between the two treatments; mean reduction was 1.59 dose steps for budesonide Turbuhaler and 1.65 dose steps for FP Diskhaler (p = 0.52), and minimal effective dose was 188 micrograms for budesonide Turbuhaler and 180 micrograms for FP Diskhaler. After these dose reductions, the same level of asthma control was observed in the budesonide Turbuhaler and FP Diskhaler groups. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences between the two inhaler-drug combinations were seen in daytime or nighttime symptoms, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, use of rescue beta 2-agonist, lung functions at the clinic, exercise-induced fall in lung function, or 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion during the first 5-week period.
                Microgram for microgram, budesonide Turbuhaler and FP Diskhaler are equally effective in treatment of children with moderate asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids have become the mainstay treatment of bronchial asthma. However, simultaneous evaluations of efficacy and side effects are few. This study aimed to compare the relative effect of fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide (BUD) on bronchial responsiveness and endogenous cortisol secretion in adults with asthma. The study was double-blind and included 66 adults with asthma, who were randomized to FP (n = 33) or BUD (n = 33). Prestudy, all participants were clinically stable, using inhaled corticosteroids and hyperresponsive to methacholine. Eligible patients were randomized to three consecutive 2-wk periods with either FP 250 microg twice daily, FP 500 microg twice daily, and FP 1,000 microg twice daily, or BUD 400 microg twice daily, BUD 800 microg twice daily, and BUD 1,600 microg twice daily, delivered by Diskhaler and Turbuhaler, respectively. Before randomization and at the end of each treatment, bronchial methacholine PD(20), 24-h urinary cortisol excretion (24-h UC), plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and blood eosinophils were determined. The relative PD(20) potency between FP and BUD was 2.51 (95% CI, 1.05-5.99; p < 0. 05), while the relative 24-h UC potency was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.44-0.83; p < 0.01). The differential therapeutic ratio (FP/BUD) based on PD(20) potency and 24-h UC was 4.18 (95% CI, 1.16-15.03; p < 0.05). The difference in systemic potency was also seen for plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and blood eosinophils. Therapeutic ratio over a wide dose range, determined by impact on bronchial responsiveness and endogenous corticosteroid production, seems to favor FP. Qvar Autohaler efficacy on asthma control, assessed with E. Juniper asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), was compared with fluticasone and budesonide. An open randomized study, stratified (2:1) on the intake of long-acting beta2-mimetics (LAbeta2), was performed in patients with moderate to severe poorly controlled asthma (defined by at least one nocturnal discomfort in the last 5 days or a mean of 2 puffs of short-acting beta2-mimetics in the last 7 days or exercise dyspnea) despite treatment with beclomethasone < or = 1000 microg/day (or equivalent). 460 patients received Qvar Autohaler 800 microg/day (n = 149), fluticasone Diskus 1000 microg/day (n = 149) or budesonide Turbuhaler 1600 microg/day (n = 162) during 12 weeks. Asthma control improved in all groups, with no difference between groups. For patients treated with LAbeta2 (n = 286) a significantly greater improvement of the ACQ score was obtained with Qvar Autohaler versus fluticasone (1.0 +/- 1.0 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.9; P = 0.019), but not versus budesonide (0.9 +/- 0.9). Pulmonary function test improvements were similar in the 3 groups. The significant improvement in asthma control in patients receiving LAbeta2 suggests potential advantages for extrafine aerosols as part of anti-inflammatory treatment optimization. Flovent Diskus is a powder formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) delivered via a breath-actuated, multidose inhaler.
                To determine the efficacy and safety of dry powder FP administered once or twice daily (200 microg per day) to children with persistent asthma.
                Twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a 52-week, open-label extension. Children aged 4 to 11 were required to have pulmonary function 50% to 85% of predicted values. The population was stratified for baseline therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/cromolyn or bronchodilators only). After a 2-week placebo run-in, 242 patients received dry powder FP 200 microg each morning, dry powder FP 100 microg BID, or placebo for 12 weeks; 192 were rerandomized to the QD or BID regimen for an additional 52 weeks of open-label treatment. Primary endpoints were mean changes in FEV1 and morning PEF recorded at clinic visits.
                Both dry powder FP regimens significantly improved FEV1, evening PEF, and asthma symptoms at the double-blind phase endpoint (P < or = .017 compared with placebo). The BID regimen also significantly improved morning PEF and nighttime awakenings due to asthma (P < or = .005). Among patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids/cromolyn, improvements observed with the QD and BID regimens were similar. Patients switched from BID to open-label QD treatment showed additional improvements at week 52 generally comparable to patients who received the BID regimen during both phases. Fluticasone propionate was well tolerated for up to 64 weeks with few reports of drug-related adverse events or morning plasma cortisol abnormalities.
                Once daily dosing of dry powder FP 200 microg is an effective and convenient alternative for children whose asthma is controlled with a more frequent dosing regimen of inhaled corticosteroids. Fluticasone propionate, an inhaled corticosteroid with negligible systemic bioavailability via the oral route, is efficacious in the treatment of asthma when administered via metered-dose inhaler.
                To evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate powder in patients with moderate asthma previously treated with an inhaled corticosteroid.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study of 342 adolescent and adult patients with moderate asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) between 50% and 80% of predicted] treated previously by beclomethasone dipropionate or triamcinolone acetonide. Patients received fluticasone propionate powder 50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, 250 micrograms, or placebo via a breath-actuated inhalation device, the Diskhaler, twice daily for 12 weeks.
                Patients in the fluticasone propionate groups experienced a mean increase from baseline to endpoint in FEV1 ranging from 0.43 L to 0.47 L. Patients in the placebo group experienced a mean decrease from baseline of 0.22 L (P < .001). The probability of patients remaining in the study over time without developing signs of exacerbating asthma was significantly greater in the fluticasone propionate groups than in the placebo group (P = .001). Asthma symptom scores, supplemental rescue albuterol use, and number of nighttime awakenings due to asthma requiring treatment also improved significantly with all fluticasone propionate treatment regimens compared with placebo (P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences at endpoint among the three fluticasone propionate groups. No serious drug-related adverse events occurred.
                Fluticasone propionate powder (50, 100, and 250 micrograms) was well-tolerated and significantly improved lung function in patients with moderate asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended for the treatment of persistent asthma. Comparative clinical studies evaluating 2 or more doses of these agents are few.
                We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of fluticasone propionate (88 micrograms twice daily and 220 micrograms twice daily) with 2 doses of beclomethasone dipropionate (168 micrograms twice daily and 336 micrograms twice daily) in subjects with persistent asthma.
                Three hundred ninety-nine subjects participated in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Eligible subjects were using daily inhaled corticosteroids and had an FEV1 of 45% to 80% of predicted value. Clinic visits, including spirometry, were conducted every 1 to 2 weeks. Subjects recorded symptoms, use of albuterol, and peak expiratory flows on daily diary cards.
                Fluticasone propionate treatment resulted in significantly (P </=.034) greater improvements in objective pulmonary function parameters than did beclomethasone dipropionate treatment and significantly greater reductions in daily albuterol use (P </=.010) and asthma symptoms (P </=.027). Both low-dose (88 micrograms twice daily) and medium-dose (220 micrograms twice daily) fluticasone propionate significantly increased FEV1 compared with higher doses of beclomethasone dipropionate (P =. 006). Low-dose and medium-dose fluticasone propionate improved FEV1 by 0.31 L (14%) and 0.36 L (15%), respectively, compared with improvements of 0.18 L (8%) and 0.21 L (9%) with low-dose and medium-dose beclomethasone dipropionate. The adverse event profiles were similar for both medications.
                Fluticasone propionate provides greater asthma control at roughly half the dose of beclomethasone dipropionate, with a comparable adverse event profile. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical effects of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide in asthmatic children using two common ways of administration. Twenty-one children, aged 4-14 years, who regularly used inhaled corticosteroids for their control of asthma were included in the study. The drugs were studied by using a double-blind randomized cross-over design trial with a single-blind placebo period at the end. Each period lasted 3 weeks. The dosage was 100 micrograms b.i.d. for both drugs. Budesonide was administered via a spacer inhaler (Inhalet), and beclomethasone dipropionate via a standard actuator. Compared with placebo, both drugs significantly improved PEFR values for morning (20% for budesonide and 14% for BDP) and evening (14% for budesonide and 9% for BDP). Both morning and/or evening peak flows were significantly higher during the budesonide treatment as compared with the BDP treatment. In comparison with the placebo period, FEV1.0 was significantly improved with budesonide but not with BDP. Plasma cortisol, WBC counts, differential and eosinophilia counts in blood were determined at the beginning and the end of each period. All of the values except for the eosinophil counts were within normal ranges. Candida was looked for but not found in any case. No other adverse effects were registered. For most of the children, a deterioration of the state of their asthma and increased need for concomitant therapy during the placebo period confirmed their steroid dependence. The number of administrations with concomitant anti-asthmatic therapy increased during placebo by 61% as compared with the budesonide therapy, and by 40% compared with the BDP therapy. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate, an inhaled corticosteroid, in adolescents and adults with moderate asthma who were previously taking inhaled corticosteroids. After a 2-week, open-label screening period, a double-masked, randomized, parallel-group, dose-ranging study was conducted over 12 weeks in 21 outpatient centers throughout the United States. Patients (N = 304) > or = 12 years of age with moderate asthma previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids and beta-sympathomimetic bronchodilators were enrolled. Patients were assigned to receive placebo or fluticasone propionate 100, 250, or 500 micrograms twice daily via a metered-dose inhaler without a spacer device. These doses refer to the amount of fluticasone propionate released from the valve of the metered-dose inhaler; the corresponding doses released from the activator of the metered-dose inhaler are 88 micrograms, 220 micrograms, and 440 micrograms, respectively. Between baseline and end point, mean values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second decreased 0.31 L in the placebo group and improved 0.39 L, 0.30 L, and 0.43 L in patients receiving 100-micrograms, 250-micrograms, and 500-micrograms fluticasone propionate, respectively. The differences between placebo and all treatment groups were statistically significant. More patients were withdrawn from placebo (72%) than from fluticasone propionate (13% to 16%) because of failure to meet predetermined asthma stability criteria. Differences in baseline-to-end point changes in morning peak expiratory flow rate, physician overall assessments and patient-rated assessment of symptoms, and albuterol use for symptom control also significantly favored each fluticasone propionate group over placebo. There were essentially no differences in efficacy among the three fluticasone propionate groups. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 8% of placebo-treated patients and 13% to 15% of fluticasone propionate-treated patients; these events were mainly localized to the oropharynx/ larynx. A 12-week course of fluticasone propionate (100, 250, and 500 micrograms twice daily) was well tolerated and more effective than placebo based on maintenance of asthma stability, pulmonary function tests, physician and patient assessments, and rescue bronchodilator use. No dose-related effects were observed with the dosages of fluticasone propionate used in this study. There are no data currently available on the correct schedule for the initiation of treatment with nebulized suspension of budesonide in children with recurrent wheezing episodes. We compared the efficacy and safety of starting with a high dose followed by a stepwise decrease to a continuous low dose.
                In a double-blind design, 42 children aged 6 months to 3 years were randomly allocated to receive either a high starting dose of 1 mg budesonide twice daily followed by a stepwise decrease of 25% every second day for 1 week (group A) or a low dose of 0.25 mg twice daily for 1 week (group B). Efficacy was assessed with daily symptom scores and the systemic effect of the corticosteroids with the adrenocorticotropic hormone test.
                The two groups were comparable for all parameters evaluated. During the first week of treatment, there was a significant decrease in asthmatic symptomatology only in group A: a 59% decrease for wheezing (p = 0.0001), 39% for diurnal cough (p = 0.036), and 39% for nocturnal cough (p = 0.04). Mean time to clinical response was 3.0 days in group A and 5.7 days in group B (p = 0.02). This early improvement was sustained for the rest of the follow-up period. The high dose starting schedule was not associated with any change in serum cortisol level.
                The administration of nebulized suspension of budesonide at a high starting dose schedule followed by a rapid (1 week) stepwise decrease yields a significant early improvement in asthma symptoms and causes no change in serum cortisol levels. The response in asthmatic young children to inhaled steroids within the usual pediatric dose range is unknown. We therefore evaluated the dose-related response in young children with moderate asthma to inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) (delivered via the Babyhaler spacer device) within the pediatric dose range. A total of 237 children (mean age 28 mo, range 12 to 47) with moderate asthmatic symptoms were studied in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study of 12 wk treatment following a 4-wk run-in period. The median use of rescue medication was 1 dose in 2 d during the run-in period. FP 50 micrograms twice daily (FP100) and 100 micrograms twice daily (FP200) was compared with placebo inhaled from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) and the Babyhaler spacer device. With FP200 there was a statistically significant improvement from baseline, as compared with the placebo group, in 8 of 10 diary card parameters, including the three symptom domains of wheeze, cough, and breathlessness, and use of rescue medication. FP100 produced a significant reduction in 5 of these 10 parameters, whereas no significant differences were found between the FP200 and FP100. The numbers of patients with at least one exacerbation during treatment with placebo, FP100, and FP200 were 37%, 26%, and 20%, respectively. This difference between placebo and FP200, as well as the dose-related order was significant (p < 0.05). Both FP doses were as well tolerated as placebo over the 12 wk treatment with a similar incidence of adverse effects. Asthmatic symptoms in 1- to 3-yr-old children responded in a significant and dose-related manner to treatment with FP within a pediatric dose range.
Fluticasone given at half the daily dose of beclomethasone or budesonide leads to small improvements in measures of airway calibre, but it appears to have a higher risk of causing sore throat and when given at the same daily dose leads to increased hoarseness. There are concerns about adrenal suppression with Fluticasone given to children at doses greater than 400 mcg/day, but the randomised trials included in this review did not provide sufficient data to address this issue.