A Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study of Atorvastatin. Safety and efficacy of atorvastatin in patients with severe renal dysfunction. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once daily atorvastatin (10 mg) in patients with elevated LDL-cholesterol. Comparative effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin across their dose ranges in patients with hypercholesterolemia and without active arterial disease. Efficacy and safety of a new hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, in patients with combined hyperlipidemia: comparison with fenofibrate. Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia and a high risk of coronary heart disease: a randomized, controlled trial. Atorvastatin: an effective lipid-modifying agent in familial hypercholesterolemia. Efficacy and tolerability of a generic and a branded formulation of atorvastatin 20 mg/d in hypercholesterolemic Korean adults at high risk for cardiovascular disease: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy clinical trial. Atorvastatin increases low-density lipoprotein size and enhances high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in male, but not in female patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Effect of rosuvastatin on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Comparison of the efficacy of atorvastatin versus cerivastatin in primary hypercholesterolemia. Efficacy and safety of a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolemia or severe hyperlipidemia: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Coadministration of colesevelam hydrochloride with atorvastatin lowers LDL cholesterol additively. Reduction of LDL cholesterol by 25% to 60% in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia by atorvastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. Prolonged inhibition of cholesterol synthesis explains the efficacy of atorvastatin. A randomized trial of the effects of atorvastatin and niacin in patients with combined hyperlipidemia or isolated hypertriglyceridemia. Collaborative Atorvastatin Study Group. Treating to target patients with primary hyperlipidaemia: comparison of the effects of ATOrvastatin and ROSuvastatin (the ATOROS study). Comparison of once-daily, niacin extended-release/lovastatin with standard doses of atorvastatin and simvastatin (the ADvicor Versus Other Cholesterol-Modulating Agents Trial Evaluation [ADVOCATE]). Assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed dose combination of atorvastatin 10 mg + metformin SR 500 mg in diabetic dyslipidaemia in adult Indian patients. Comparative dose efficacy study of atorvastatin versus simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (the CURVES study) Treating patients with documented atherosclerosis to National Cholesterol Education Program-recommended low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol goals with atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin and simvastatin. Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin compared over 52 weeks of treatment in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Effects of atorvastatin on Lp(a) and lipoprotein profiles in hemodialysis patients. Effects of different statin treatments on small dense low-density lipoprotein in patients with metabolic syndrome. Comparison of efficacy and safety of atorvastatin (10mg) with simvastatin (10mg) at six weeks. ASSET Investigators. Comparison of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. A placebo-controlled trial examining atorvastatin in dyslipidemic patients undergoing CAPD. Comparison of efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in African-American patients in a six-week trial. A comparative study with rosuvastatin in subjects with metabolic syndrome: results of the COMETS study. Treating to meet NCEP-recommended LDL cholesterol concentrations with atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, or simvastatin in patients with risk factors for coronary heart disease. A 52-week, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy study to assess the efficacy of atorvastatin and simvastatin in reaching low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride targets: the treat-to-target (3T) study. Comparative efficacy and safety of low-dose pitavastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Effect of atorvastatin on low-density lipoprotein subtypes in patients with different forms of hyperlipoproteinemia and control subjects. Efficacy and tolerability of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin when force-titrated in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: results from the ECLIPSE study. Comparison of atorvastatin versus fenofibrate in reaching lipid targets and influencing biomarkers of endothelial damage in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia. Effect of a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, on lipids, apolipoproteins and lipoprotein particles in patients with elevated serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR* Trial). Efficacy of atorvastatin compared with simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Effects of atorvastatin 20 mg, rosuvastatin 10 mg, and atorvastatin/ezetimibe 5 mg/5 mg on lipoproteins and glucose metabolism. A comparison of simvastatin and atorvastatin up to maximal recommended doses in a large multicenter randomized clinical trial. Atorvastatin treatment beneficially alters the lipoprotein profile and increases low-density lipoprotein particle diameter in patients with combined dyslipidemia and impaired fasting glucose/type 2 diabetes. Dose-comparison study of the combination of ezetimibe and simvastatin (Vytorin) versus atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the Vytorin Versus Atorvastatin (VYVA) study. High-dose atorvastatin therapy in severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of pitavastatin and atorvastatin: an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, dose-titration study in Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia. The comparison of the effects of standard 20 mg atorvastatin daily and 20 mg atorvastatin every other day on serum LDL-cholesterol and high sensitive C-reactive protein levels. An assessment of the efficacy of atorvastatin in achieving LDL cholesterol target levels in patients with coronary heart disease: a general practice study. Plasma mevalonic acid, an index of cholesterol synthesis in vivo, and responsiveness to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Effects of atorvastatin on red-blood cell Na(+)/Li(+) countertransport in hyperlipidemic patients with and without hypertension. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack. Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on LDL and HDL particle concentrations in patients with metabolic syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Action of atorvastatin in combined hyperlipidemia : preferential reduction of cholesteryl ester transfer from HDL to VLDL1 particles. Effects of atorvastatin on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol phenotype and C-reactive protein levels in patients undergoing long-term dialysis. Comparative study of low doses of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on lipid and glycemic control in patients with metabolic syndrome and hypercholesterolemia. Comparison of effects on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with type IIa or IIb hypercholesterolemia. Effect on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol of maximum dose simvastatin and atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: results of the Comparative HDL Efficacy and Safety Study (CHESS). Atorvastatin causes insulin resistance and increases ambient glycemia in hypercholesterolemic patients. Comparison of efficacy and safety of atorvastatin and simvastatin in patients with dyslipidemia with and without coronary heart disease. The effect of high dose atorvastatin therapy on lipids and lipoprotein subfractions in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. Atorvastatin reduces macrophage accumulation in atherosclerotic plaques: a comparison of a nonstatin-based regimen in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Effects of atorvastatin on dyslipidaemia in uraemic patients on peritoneal dialysis. A double-blind trial on the effects of atorvastatin on glycemic control in Japanese diabetic patients with hypercholesterolemia. Comparison of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in Hispanic-Americans with hypercholesterolemia (from the STARSHIP trial). LDL-C/HDL-C ratio in subjects with cardiovascular disease and a low HDL-C: results of the RADAR (Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin in different Dosages And Reverse cholesterol transport) study. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Impact of atorvastatin on serum vaspin levels in hypercholesterolemic patients with moderate cardiovascular risk. Effect of statins on LDL particle size in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia: a comparison between atorvastatin and pravastatin. Impact of the pravastatin or atorvastatin evaluation and infection therapy-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 22/Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering trials on trends in intensive versus moderate statin therapy in Ontario, Canada. Comparative long-term efficacy and tolerability of pitavastatin 4 mg and atorvastatin 20-40 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and combined (mixed) dyslipidaemia. Efficacy and safety of ABT-335 (fenofibric acid) in combination with atorvastatin in patients with mixed dyslipidemia. Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with niacin extended-release and simvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with dyslipidemia: The SUPREME Study. Short term effect of atorvastatin and vitamin E on serum levels of C3, a sensitive marker of the risk of myocardial infarction in men. Multicenter collaborative randomized parallel group comparative study of pitavastatin and atorvastatin in Japanese hypercholesterolemic patients: collaborative study on hypercholesterolemia drug intervention and their benefits for atherosclerosis prevention (CHIBA study). Lipid and apoprotein changes during atorvastatin up-titration in hemodialysis patients with hypercholesterolemia: a placebo-controlled study. The effect of atorvastatin on erythrocyte membranes and serum lipids in patients with type-2 hypercholesterolemia. Efficacy and safety of coadministered amlodipine and atorvastatin in patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia: results of the AVALON trial. [Effect of atorvastatin on endothelial function in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia]. A 52-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison of the tolerability and effects of pitavastatin and atorvastatin on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and glucose metabolism in Japanese patients with elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and glucose intolerance. Effect of atorvastatin on lipoprotein (a) and interleukin-10: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Cholesterol-lowering effects of rosuvastatin compared with atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes -- CORALL study. Effects of low doses of simvastatin and atorvastatin on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Hemostatic effects of atorvastatin versus simvastatin. Influence of atorvastatin on apolipoprotein E and AI kinetics in patients with type 2 diabetes. [The comparison of simvastatin and atorvastatin effects on hemostatic parameters in patients with hyperlipidemia type II]. Effects of rosuvastatin on lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins in the dyslipidaemia of diabetes. Atorvastatin and the dyslipidemia of early renal failure. Achieving LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B target levels in high-risk patients: Measuring Effective Reductions in Cholesterol Using Rosuvastatin therapY (MERCURY) II. Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with simvastatin. Achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in high-risk patients in managed care: comparison of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and simvastatin in the SOLAR trial. The effect of atorvastatin on postprandial lipaemia in overweight or obese women homozygous for apo E3. The beneficial effects of lipid-lowering drugs beyond lipid-lowering effects: a comparative study with pravastatin, atorvastatin, and fenofibrate in patients with type IIa and type IIb hyperlipidemia. Effects of switching statins on achievement of lipid goals: Measuring Effective Reductions in Cholesterol Using Rosuvastatin Therapy (MERCURY I) study. Lowering effects of four different statins on serum triglyceride level. Placebo-controlled trial of high-dose atorvastatin in patients with severe cerebral small vessel disease. Atorvastatin enhances the plasma clearance of chylomicron-like emulsions in subjects with atherogenic dyslipidemia: relevance to the in vivo metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Efficacy of atorvastatin in achieving National Cholesterol Education Program low-density lipoprotein targets in women with severe dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease or risk factors for cardiovascular disease: The Women's Atorvastatin Trial on Cholesterol (WATCH). Effect of lovastatin on early carotid atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events. Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Progression Study (ACAPS) Research Group. Effects of short-term atorvastatin treatment on global fibrinolytic capacity, and sL-selectin and sFas levels in hyperlipidemic patients with coronary artery disease. Effect of atorvastatin on postprandial lipoprotein metabolism in hypertriglyceridemic patients. Short-term atorvastatin treatment improves endothelial function in hypercholesterolemic women.
BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the number one cause of death in Western societies. Elevated levels of plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides (TG) increase the risk for CHD. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl conenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors effectively reduce plasma cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. This study assesses the safety and dose-related effects of atorvastatin calcium on lipoprotein fractions in patients with LDL cholesterol levels between 160 mg/dL (4.1 mM) and 250 mg/dL (6.5 mM) or less and TG levels of 400 mg/dL (4.5 mM) or less. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were enrolled in a 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Patients received placebo or atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, 60, or 80 mg once daily. Adjusted mean decreases in LDL cholesterol for patients receiving atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, 60, and 80 mg were 37%, 42%, 50%, 52%, and 59%, respectively, compared with a mean increase of 0.3% for patients receiving placebo; the differences between each of the atorvastatin dose groups and placebo were statistically significant (P =.0001). Total cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B were significantly reduced in atorvastatin groups (P =.0001). Adverse events were similar in the placebo and atorvastatin treatment groups. No patient had a serious adverse event or withdrew because of an adverse event during this study. CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin effectively lowered plasma LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and apoB levels in a dose-related manner. Atorvastatin was well tolerated in hyperlipidemic patients over a 6-week period. To investigate the efficacy and safety of a daily dose of 10 mg of atorvastatin in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4 and 5 and a glomerular filtration rate of <30 ml/min.
                This was an open, prospective, randomized study. A total of 143 patients were included: 73 were controls and 70 were prescribed 10 mg/day of atorvastatin. As efficacy variables, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels were determined at the start of the study and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months.
                The follow-up period was a mean of 20+/-14.4 months (range 1-36 months) for those on atorvastatin versus 22+/-12.7 months (range 0.5-36 months) for the controls. Compared with baseline values, patients treated with atorvastatin had significantly lower concentrations of total cholesterol at Month 36 (5.8 vs 4.4 mmol/l; -23%; p<0.001), of LDL cholesterol at Month 36 (3.6 vs 2.2 mmol/l; -35%; p<0.001) and of triglycerides at Months 24 (2.5 vs 1.9 mmol/l) and 36 (2.5 vs 1.8 mmol/l). The controls had significantly reduced levels of total cholesterol at Month 36 (p<0.21) and of LDL cholesterol at Months 30 and 36. Compared with the controls, the atorvastatin group had lower levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol at Months 1-30. Fifteen patients (21%) stopped taking their medication as they could not tolerate the side-effects, the most frequent complaints being gastrointestinal discomfort and headache.
                Although the medication caused no severe adverse events, we recommend caution when using atorvastatin for severe CKD patients until further evidence of its safety and efficacy is verified. Lowering of serum cholesterol levels by pharmacologic intervention with statins reduces the incidence of cardiovascular events in subjects with and without atherosclerotic manifestations. In an 8-week, randomized, double-blind study we compared the efficacy and safety of the new compound atorvastatin for reducing LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) with placebo in an Asian patient cohort. Patients with LDL-C between 160 mg/dl and 250 mg/dl were randomly assigned to treatment with 10 mg atorvastatin or placebo once daily for 8 weeks. At the end of weeks 4 and 8 of the randomized phase, the serum concentrations of lipid parameters as well as safety parameters were determined. Fifty-four patients (32 males and 22 females) were enrolled. Twenty-six patients were assigned to the treatment group. The primary end-point, LDL-C, was reduced by 40% and 42% after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment in the atorvastatin treated patients (p<0.001). The reductions in total cholesterol and triglycerides were up to 31% and 23%, respectively. The HDL-C levels increased up to 11% (p=0.043). There were no significant adverse events. Transient increases in CPK levels (10 times) without myalgia were identified in 1 patient. Atorvastatin, 10 mg/day produced significant reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol and triglycerides and an elevation of HDL-C levels when used as an adjunct to diet in hyperlipidemic patients. The majority of the clinical effects could be attained by week 4. The overall safety profile of atorvastatin was similar to that of placebo. Atorvastatin was considered to be well tolerated in this patient cohort. The lipid-lowering effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin were determined across their dose ranges in a 6-week, randomized, double-blind trial. Three hundred seventy-four hypercholesterolemic patients with fasting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol > or =160 but <250 mg/dl (> or =4.14 but <6.47 mmol/L) and fasting triglycerides <400 mg/dl (<4.52 mmol/L) and without active arterial disease within 3 months of entry received once-daily rosuvastatin (5, 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg [n = 209]) or atorvastatin (10, 20, 40, or 80 mg [n = 165]). The percentage decrease in plasma LDL cholesterol versus dose was log-linear for each drug, ranging from -46.6% to -61.9% for rosuvastatin 10 and 80 mg, compared with -38.2% to -53.5% for atorvastatin 10 and 80 mg. The dose curve for rosuvastatin yielded an 8.4% greater decrease in LDL cholesterol compared with atorvastatin at any given dose (p <0.001). Similarly greater decreases were observed for rosuvastatin across the dose range in total cholesterol (-4.9%), non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol (-7.0%), apolipoprotein B (-6.3%), and related ratios versus atorvastatin (all p <0.001). Because dose responses for HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein A-I were non-log-linear and nonparallel between the 2 drugs, percentage changes from baseline were compared at each dose. Significantly greater increases for rosuvastatin compared with atorvastatin were observed for HDL cholesterol at 40 and 80 mg, and for apolipoprotein A-I at 80 mg. Significantly greater triglyceride decreases were seen at 80 mg with atorvastatin over rosuvastatin. Both rosuvastatin and atorvastatin were well tolerated over 6 weeks. This 24-week, randomized, open-label multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin compared with fenofibrate in the treatment of patients with combined hyperlipidemia (CHL). Following a 6-week baseline period, 84 patients with CHL were randomly assigned to either atorvastatin treatment, 10 mg QD for 12 weeks increasing to 20 mg QD for 12 weeks, or fenofibrate treatment, 100 mg TID for 24 weeks. Changes from baseline in lipid parameters were evaluated at weeks 12 and 24. At both 10- and 20-mg doses, atorvastatin treatment resulted in significantly greater reductions in LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein (apo) B, total cholesterol, LDL-apoB, and lipoprotein-B compared to 300-mg fenofibrate treatment (P < .05). While atorvastatin also resulted in clinically significant reductions in triglyceride, VLDL cholesterol, apoB in VLDL, triglyceride in VLDL, and apoC-III and significant increases in HDL cholesterol and apoA-I levels, fenofibrate was more effective than atorvastatin in altering all these parameters. However, by significantly affecting both the cholesterol-rich and triglyceride-rich particles, atorvastatin holds promise as a lipid-regulator able to adequately treat a broad range of patients that includes those with CHL. This double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial compared rosuvastatin and atorvastatin for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in adults with hypercholesterolemia and a high risk of coronary heart disease.
                After a 6-week dietary lead-in period, patients with LDL-C levels > or =160 and <250 mg/dL and triglyceride levels < or =400 mg/dL were randomly assigned to 24 weeks' treatment in 1 of 3 groups, each with forced dose titrations at 12 and 18 weeks. Starting and titrated doses for each group were rosuvastatin 5, 20, and 80 mg (n = 127); rosuvastatin 10, 40, and 80 mg (n = 128); and atorvastatin 10, 40, and 80 mg (n = 128).
                At 24 weeks, LDL-C was reduced significantly more with 80 mg rosuvastatin (combined rosuvastatin group) than with atorvastatin 80 mg (60% vs 52% [P <.001]). At 12 weeks, rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg reduced LDL-C significantly more than atorvastatin 10 mg (40% [P <.01], 47% [P <.001] vs 35%). At 18 weeks, LDL-C reductions were also significantly greater in both rosuvastatin groups than in the atorvastatin group (52% [P <.01], 59% [P <.001] vs 47%). Consequently, more patients receiving rosuvastatin achieved LDL-C goals. Total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL-C, apolipoproteins B and A-I, and all lipid ratios were more favorably modified by rosuvastatin at 24 weeks (P <.01). Effects of the 2 agents on triglycerides were similar.
                Rosuvastatin was more efficacious than atorvastatin in modifying lipids in patients with hypercholesterolemia and a high coronary heart disease risk. Hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors are the drugs of choice in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), which has a high risk of ischemic heart disease. An open-label study was conducted to test the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin, a new synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor in proven FH. After a 4-week placebo phase, 22 subjects were randomized to either 80 mg atorvastatin at night (n = 11) or 40 mg twice a day for 6 weeks. The two dosage groups were well matched and had no difference in lipoprotein responses. After 6 weeks, the LDL cholesterol concentration was reduced by 57%, from 8.16 +/- 1.15 to 3.53 +/- 0.99 mmol/L (P < .001). The total cholesterol concentration decreased from 9.90 +/- 1.32 to 5.43 mmol/L (P < .001). HDL cholesterol concentration increased from 1.19 +/- 0.31 to 1.49 +/- 0.43 mmol/L (P < .001). Triglyceride concentrations decreased from 1.34 +/- 0.66 to 0.88 +/- 0.36 mmol/L (P < .01). Three subjects had single, transient increases of serum transaminase of up to twice the upper limit of normal. Apolipoprotein B concentration decreased significantly by 42%. Changes in apolipoproteins AI and (a) were not statistically significant. Nondenaturing gradient gel electrophoresis revealed increases in the size of smaller LDL particles in four subjects. Plasma fibrinogen concentration increased by 44%. The drug was well tolerated. One subject withdrew for personal reasons. Atorvastatin is a powerful and safe lipid-modifying agent for LDL cholesterol; it also modifies HDL cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, and may suffice as a single agent for many subjects with heterozygous FH. The reduction in plasma LDL-C concentrations with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy has been reported to reduce cardiovascular risk and mortality in individuals with or without preexisting coronary artery disease and elevated LDL-C concentrations. Atorvastatin is a statin used for lowering LDL-C concentrations. A generic formulation of atorvastatin is being developed in Korea. This study was undertaken for the purposes of marketing the generic formulation.
                This study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a generic formulation of atorvastatin 20 mg/d versus a branded formulation at the same dosage in hypercholesterolemic Korean adults at high risk for cardiovascular events.
                This 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study was conducted at 10 clinical centers in Korea between September 2008 and May 2009. Male and female patients aged 20 to 85 years at high risk for cardiovascular events (defined as an elevated LDL-C concentration [≥100 mg/dL]) were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive generic or branded atorvastatin 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage change from baseline to 8 weeks in LDL-C concentration. Secondary end points were the percentage changes from baseline in total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), HDL-C, apolipoprotein (apo) A1 and B, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations; small, dense LDL (sdLDL) fraction; and tolerability. Tolerability was assessed using physical examination, laboratory testing, and by recording adverse events (AEs) at each visit. An additional secondary end point was the proportion of patients who achieved an LDL-C goal of <100 mg/dL.
                A total of 244 patients were randomized to treatment, and 33 patients were withdrawn from the study (9 patients did not receive the study medication, 11 patients due to AEs, and 13 patients due to withdrawal of consent). A total of 211 patients completed the study (50.7% male; 100% Asian; mean [SD] age, 61.7 [9.2] years) (106 patients in the group that received Accepted for publication October 5, 2010. the generic formulation and 105 patients in the group that received the branded formulation). LDL-C concentrations were reduced from the baseline by 44% and 46% after 8 weeks of treatment with the generic and branded formulations, respectively (P = NS). The percentage changes from baseline to study end in HDL-C, TC, TG, apo A1, apo B, and hsCRP concentrations and sdLDL fraction the proportions of patients who achieved the LDL-C goal between the 2 groups did not reach statistical significance. The most commonly reported events were hepatobiliary laboratory abnormality (1.7%), general somatic discomfort (1.7%), and epigastric pain (0.8%) in the group that received the generic formulation, and myalgia (1.7%), epigastric pain (0.9%), and elevation of creatinine phosphokinase (0.9%) in the group that received the branded formulation. No serious AEs were reported in either group.
                After 8 weeks of treatment, the differences in the LDL-C-lowering effects between the generic and branded formulations of atorvastatin 20 mg/d did not reach statistical significance in these Korean patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. Both formulations were generally well tolerated.
                Copyright © 2010 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved. The effects of atorvastatin (Lipitor) were evaluated in 40 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Following a 6 week drug-free baseline period 20 male and 20 female patients were treated with atorvastatin 40 mg once daily (QD) for the initial 6 weeks increasing to 80 mg QD during the following 6 weeks. Atorvastatin 40 and 80 mg resulted in a dose related reduction in LDL cholesterol of 44 and 50% (P<0.001), respectively. The reduction of triglycerides (TG) was 35% (P<0.001) with 40 and 80 mg atorvastatin. The lipoprotein lipase and the hepatic lipase activity decreased dose independently by 13% (P<0.05) and 18% (P<0.01), respectively. In males, a dose independent increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration was observed of 8%, (P<0.05). In females, the HDL cholesterol concentration did not change. Baseline LDL size in the females was significantly larger than in the males, being 268+/-6 A and 264+/-8 A (P<0.05), respectively. In males LDL size increased significantly from 264+/-8 A at baseline to269+/-6 A at 40 mg (P<0.05) and to 270+/-5 A (P<0.05) at 80 mg atorvastatin. In females LDL size did not change upon treatment with atorvastatin 40 and 80 mg QD. In conclusion, atorvastatin has the ability to decrease cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations as well as the activity of both lipoprotein and hepatic lipase activity. Additionally it has a favorable effect on LDL size and HDL cholesterol concentration in male, but not in female FH patients. Rosuvastatin is a new, synthetic, orally active statin, with marked low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering activity. We conducted 2 dose-ranging studies. In the first study, after a 6-week dietary run-in, 142 moderately hypercholesterolemic patients were randomized equally to receive double-blind placebo or rosuvastatin 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, or 40 mg or open-label atorvastatin 10 or 80 mg once daily for 6 weeks; in the second study, conducted to extend the rosuvastatin dose range, 64 patients were randomized to double-blind, once-daily placebo or rosuvastatin 40 or 80 mg (1:1:2 ratio) for 6 weeks. Data from both studies were combined for analysis of lipid effects. No statistical comparison of atorvastatin arms with placebo or rosuvastatin was performed. Rosuvastatin was associated with highly significant dose-dependent reductions in LDL cholesterol compared with placebo (p <0.001); decreases ranged from 34% (1 mg) to 65% (80 mg). Linear regression analysis indicated an additional 4.5% LDL cholesterol reduction for each doubling of the rosuvastatin dose. Across the dose range, approximately 90% of LDL cholesterol reduction occurred within the first 2 weeks of treatment. Significant, dose-dependent reductions in total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B with rosuvastatin were also observed (p <0.001). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol increases and triglyceride reductions were consistently observed and statistically significant at some dose levels. All lipid ratios were significantly reduced at all rosuvastatin dose levels (p <0.001). Adverse events were similar across placebo and active treatments. No significant increases in alanine aminotransferase or creatine kinase were seen in any patient. Over 6 weeks, rosuvastatin produced large, rapid, dose-dependent LDL cholesterol reductions and was well tolerated in hypercholesterolemic patients. This 6-week Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Blinded End point (PROBE) study conducted at 12 sites in the United States compared the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin with cerivastatin. In all, 215 hypercholesterolemic patients (low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol > or = 160 mg/dl [4.14 mmol/L]; triglycerides < or = 400 mg/dl [4.52 mmol/L]) were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg once daily (n = 108) or cerivastatin 0.3 mg once daily (n = 107). Efficacy was assessed by measuring changes from baseline in LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and triglycerides. Atorvastatin produced significantly greater (p < 0.0001) reductions from baseline to week 6 in LDL cholesterol (37.7% vs 30.2%), total cholesterol (27.5% vs 22.2%), and apolipoprotein B (28.6% vs 21.2%), and a significantly greater (p < 0.05) increase from baseline to week 6 in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (6.8% vs 4.3%) than cerivastatin. Atorvastatin treatment was also associated with a greater percent decrease from baseline to week 6 in triglycerides, with a trend toward statistical significance (p = 0.0982). The percentage of patients that achieved the National Cholesterol Education Program LDL cholesterol goal was greater for those receiving atorvastatin (73%) than for those receiving cerivastatin (66%). The proportion of patients experiencing drug-attributable adverse events, which were mostly mild to moderate and related to the digestive system, was significantly less (p < 0.05) with atorvastatin (5%) than with cerivastatin (14%) treatment. In conclusion, atorvastatin (10 mg/day) is more effective at lowering LDL cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic patients than cerivastatin (0.3 mg/day). Both atorvastatin and cerivastatin are well tolerated, with safety profiles similar to other members of the statin class. To assess the lipid-lowering effect of atorvastatin (a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A [HMG-CoA] reductase inhibitor) on levels of serum triglycerides and other lipoprotein fractions in patients with primary hypertriglyceridemia, determine if atorvastatin causes a redistribution of triglycerides in various lipoprotein fractions, and assess its safety by reporting adverse events and clinical laboratory measurements.
                Randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial.
                Community- and university-based research centers.
                A total of 56 patients (aged 26 to 74 years) with a mean baseline triglyceride level of 6.80 mmol/L (603.3 mg/dL) and a mean baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level of 3.07 mmol/L (118.7 mg/dL).
                Cholesterol-lowering diet (National Institutes of Health National Cholesterol Education Program Step I Diet) and either 5 mg, 20 mg, or 80 mg of atorvastatin, or placebo.
                Percent change from baseline in total triglycerides for three dose levels of atorvastatin compared with placebo.
                Mean reductions in total triglycerides between 5 mg, 20 mg, and 80 mg of atorvastatin and placebo after 4 weeks of treatment were -26.5%, -32.4%, -45.8%, and -8.9%, respectively. Mean reductions in LDL-C were -16.7%, -33.2%, -41.4%, and -1.4%, respectively, and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) were -34.3%, -45.9%, -57.7%, and -5.5%, respectively. Similar mean changes in total apolipoprotein B (apo B) (-16.9%, -32.8%, -41.7%, and +1.0%), apo B in LDL (-14.8%, -29.8%, -42.0%, and -3.1%), and apo B in VLDL (-23.8%, -35.8%, -34.4%, and +11.7%) were observed. In addition, comparable mean changes in LDL triglycerides (-22.5%, -30.7%, -39.9%, and +3.9%) and VLDL triglycerides (-28.1%, -34.0%, -47.3%, and -10.8%) were seen.
                In atorvastatin treatment groups, total serum triglyceride levels decreased in a dose-dependent manner, reductions in the 20-mg and 80-mg groups were statistically significant (P < .05) compared with placebo. Atorvastatin did not cause a redistribution of triglycerides but consistently lowered triglycerides in all lipoprotein fractions. Atorvastatin was well tolerated. To determine the safety and efficacy of atorvastatin (10 to 20 mg) in children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolemia or severe hypercholesterolemia.
                Subjects (n=187) were randomly assigned to 26 weeks of treatment with atorvastatin (10 mg) or placebo. Dosage was increased to 20 mg if LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels remained >3.4 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) at week 4. At week 26, subjects received 10 mg of atorvastatin for an additional 26 weeks. Efficacy variables included percent changes in LDL-C, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B from baseline to week 26.
                Atorvastatin caused a highly significant reduction in LDL-C compared with placebo (-40% vs -0.4%, respectively; P<.001). Percent changes at week 26 also significantly favored atorvastatin for total cholesterol (-32% vs -1.5%; P<.001), triglycerides (-12% vs +1.0%; P=0.03), and apolipoprotein B (-34% vs +0.7%; P<.001), with a significantly greater increase in HDL cholesterol with atorvastatin compared with placebo (+2.8% vs -1.8%; P=.02). Atorvastatin was as well-tolerated as placebo.
                Treatment with atorvastatin for 12 months was effective and safe for pediatric subjects with known familial hypercholesterolemia or severe hypercholesterolemia. Colesevelam hydrochloride is a novel, potent, non-absorbed lipid-lowering agent previously shown to reduce low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. To examine the efficacy and safety of coadministration of colesevelam and atorvastatin, administration of these agents alone or in combination was examined in a double-blind study of 94 hypercholesterolemic men and women (baseline LDL cholesterol > or =160 mg/dl). After 4 weeks on the American Heart Association Step I diet, patients were randomized among five groups: placebo; colesevelam 3.8 g/day; atorvastatin 10 mg/day; coadminstered colesevelam 3.8 g/day plus atorvastatin 10 mg/day; or atorvastatin 80 mg/day. Fasting lipids were measured at screening, baseline and 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. LDL cholesterol decreased by 12-53% in all active treatment groups (P<0.01). LDL cholesterol reductions with combination therapy (48%) were statistically superior to colesevelam (12%) or low-dose atorvastatin (38%) alone (P<0.01), but similar to those achieved with atorvastatin 80 mg/day (53%). Total cholesterol decreased 6-39% in all active treatment groups (P<0.05). High density lipoprotein cholesterol increased significantly for all groups including placebo (P<0.05). Triglycerides decreased in patients taking atorvastatin alone (P<0.05), but were unaffected by colesevelam alone or in combination. The frequency of side effects did not differ among groups. At recommended starting doses of each agent, coadministration of colesevelam and atorvastatin was well tolerated, efficacious and produced additive LDL cholesterol reductions comparable to those observed with the maximum atorvastatin dose. This 6-week, double-blind clinical trial evaluated lipid parameter responses to different dosages of atorvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Atorvastatin is a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor under development. After completing an 8-week placebo-baseline dietary phase, 81 patients were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg atorvastatin once daily for 6 weeks. Plasma LDL cholesterol reductions from baseline were dose related, with 25% to 61% reduction from the minimum dose to the maximum dose of 80 mg atorvastatin once a day. Plasma total cholesterol and apo B reductions were also dose related. Previously, reductions in LDL cholesterol of the magnitude observed in this study have been seen only with combination drug therapy. In this study, atorvastatin was well tolerated by hyperlipidemic patients, had an acceptable safety profile, and provided greater reduction in cholesterol than other previously reported HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors or statins are effective in both the primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease, the extent of benefit being proportional to the reduction in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol achieved. Atorvastatin, a newly licensed compound, reportedly lowers LDL with greater efficacy than other statins. The mechanism of this action was, therefore, explored in twenty patients with refractory familial hypercholesterolemia who received in a single-blind sequence simvastatin 40 mg/day, placebo and atorvastatin 10 mg/day each for 4 weeks. At the end of the placebo period the effects of single 40-mg doses of simvastatin and atorvastatin on plasma levels and urinary excretion of mevalonic acid, indices of HMG-CoA reductase activity, were compared. Administration of atorvastatin 10 mg daily for 1 month lowered LDL cholesterol by 32.5%, compared with placebo (P = 0.0001), which was 4.5% less than the decrease after simvastatin 40 mg daily (P = 0.33). The area under the plasma curve and urinary mevalonic acid/ creatinine ratio were both significantly less during the 24 h after a single dose of atorvastatin 40 mg than after a single dose of simvastatin 40 mg (P < 0.01). These findings suggest that the greater efficacy of atorvastatin compared with simvastatin is due to more prolonged inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase, presumably reflecting longer residence of atorvastatin or its active metabolites in the liver. To assess the lipid-lowering effects and safety of atorvastatin and niacin in patients with combined hyperlipidemia or isolated hypertriglyceridemia.
                We performed a randomized, open-label, parallel-design, active-controlled, study in eight centers in the United States. We enrolled 108 patients with total cholesterol (TC) of > or =200 mg/dL, serum triglycerides (TG) > or =200 and < or =800 mg/dL, and apolipoprotein B (apo B) > or =110 mg/dL. Patients were randomly assigned to receive atorvastatin 10 mg once daily (n=55) or immediate-release niacin 1 g three times daily for 12 weeks (n=53). Patients were stratified based on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C): Patients with LDL-C > or =135 mg/dL were considered to have combined hyperlipidemia and patients with LDL-C <135 mg/dL were considered to have isolated hypertriglyceridemia. The primary outcome measure was percent change from baseline in LDL-C. Other lipid levels were evaluated as secondary parameters.
                Atorvastatin reduced LDL-C 30% and TC 26% from baseline, and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) 4%. Total TG were reduced 17%. Niacin reduced LDL-C 2%, TC 7%, increased HDL-C 25%, and reduced total TG 29% from baseline. There was a significant difference in LDL-C reduction, the primary efficacy parameter, between the two treatment groups (P <0.05, favoring atorvastatin), as well as a significant difference in the improvement in HDL-C (P <0.05, favoring niacin). The effect of atorvastatin was relatively consistent between patients with combined hyperlipidemia and isolated hypertriglyceridemia, whereas there was more variability between these strata in the niacin treatment group. Atorvastatin was better tolerated than niacin.
                Atorvastatin may allow patients with combined hyperlipidemia to be treated with monotherapy and offers an efficacious and well-tolerated alternative to niacin for the treatment of patients with isolated hypertriglyceridemia. In a 24-week, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study, we compared the efficacy and metabolic effects, beyond low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering, of atorvastatin (ATV) and rosuvastatin (RSV) in cardiovascular disease-free subjects with primary hyperlipidaemia, treated to an LDL-C target (130 mg/dL).
                After a 6-week dietary lead-in period, patients were randomized to RSV 10 mg/day (n = 60) or ATV 20 mg/day (n = 60). After 6 weeks on treatment the dose of the statin was increased (to RSV 20 mg/day or ATV 40 mg/day) if the treatment goal was not achieved. A control group of healthy volunteers (n = 60) was also included for the validation of baseline serum and urinary laboratory parameters. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients reaching the LDL-C goal; secondary outcomes were changes in lipid and non-lipid metabolic parameters.
                A total of 45 patients (75.0%) in the RSV-treated group and 43 (71.7%) in the ATV-treated group achieved the treatment target at the initial dose. Both regimens were generally well tolerated and there were no withdrawals due to treatment-related serious adverse events. Similar significant reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-C, apolipoprotein (apo) B, triglycerides, apoB/apoA1 ratio, fibrinogen and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were seen. RSV had a significant high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)-raising effect and showed a trend towards increasing apoA1 levels. Glycaemic control and renal function parameters were not influenced by statin therapy. ATV, but not RSV, showed a significant hypouricaemic effect.
                RSV and ATV were equally efficacious in achieving LDL-C treatment goals in patients with primary hyperlipidaemia at the initial dose and following dose titration. RSV seems to have a significantly higher HDL-C-raising effect, while ATV lowers serum uric acid levels. This study compared the relative efficacy of a once-daily niacin extended-release (ER)/lovastatin fixed-dose combination with standard doses of atorvastatin or simvastatin, with a special emphasis on relative starting doses. Subjects (n = 315) with elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol blood levels (defined as LDL cholesterol blood levels > or =160 mg/dl without coronary artery disease, or > or =130 mg/dl if coronary artery disease was present, and HDL cholesterol <45 mg/dl in men and <50 mg/dl in women) were randomized to atorvastatin, simvastatin, or niacin ER/lovastatin for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy variables were the mean percent change in LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol levels from baseline. After 8 weeks, the starting dose niacin ER/lovastatin 1,000/40 mg and the 10-mg starting dose atorvastatin both lowered mean LDL cholesterol by 38%. After 12 weeks, niacin ER/lovastatin 1,000/40 mg lowered LDL cholesterol by 42% versus 34% with the 20-mg starting dose of simvastatin (p <0.001). Niacin ER/lovastatin increased HDL cholesterol significantly more than atorvastatin or simvastatin at all compared doses (p <0.001). Niacin ER/lovastatin also provided significant improvements in triglycerides, lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein A-1, apolipoprotein B, and HDL subfractions. A total of 6% of study subjects receiving niacin ER/lovastatin withdrew because of flushing. No significant differences were seen among study groups in discontinuance due to elevated liver enzymes. No drug-induced myopathy was observed. Niacin ER/lovastatin was comparable to atorvastatin 10 mg and more effective than simvastatin 20 mg in reducing LDL cholesterol, was more effective in increasing HDL cholesterol than either atorvastatin or simvastatin, and provided greater global improvements in non-HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and lipoprotein(a). Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a marked increase in the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) or stroke (by a factor of two to three compared with non-diabetic patients), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for the majority of deaths among patients with diabetes. A new fixed dose combination containing atorvastatin 10 mg + metformin SR 500 mg is being introduced in the Indian market for the treatment of dyslipidaemia in diabetic patients. The present study was therefore undertaken to assess efficacy, safety and tolerability of a fixed dose combination of atorvastatin 10mg + metformin SR 500mg in adult Indian patients with diabetic dyslipidaemia. The final protocol was approved by relevant ethics committee before the initiation of study. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients prior to enrollment in study. The total duration of study was 14 weeks including two weeks dietary run in period. Patients fulfilling the selection criteria received a single oral tablet of fixed dose combination of atorvastatin 10mg + metformin SR 500mg once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy parameters were assessed by evaluating reduction in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose concentration levels at baseline and thereafter at each follow up visit at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks and plasma lipid profile and glycosylated Hb levels at baseline and end of study. The secondary efficacy parameters were assessed by evaluating percentage change from baseline at the end of the study (week 12) in the plasma concentration of the various lipid parameters such as total, HDL-, LDL- and very low density (VLDL)-cholesterol, triglycerides, Apo B, Apo A1, TC/LDL ratio, LDL/ HDL ratio, and percentage of patients achieving LDL-cholesterol goals as per NCEP ATP III guidelines. A total of 213 patients were enrolled in the study. Of these seven patients were lost to follow-up and considered as drop-outs. Therapy with the fixed dose combination of atorvastatin 10 mg + metformin SR 500 mg resulted in a significant reduction in the mean plasma fasting and postprandial glucose levels (35 and 38.8% respectively). There was a steep fall in the HbA1c levels from baseline levels of 8.76% to 6.74% (23.1%). There was also a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in mean total cholesterol (31.2%), LDL cholesterol (35.4%), VLDL-cholesterol (19.6%) and a significant increase HDL-cholesterol (9.5%). Thus there appeared to be trend towards reducing atherosclerosis following therapy with the fixed dose combination of atorvastatin 10 mg + metformin SR 500 mg. Mean body mass index was significantly reduced in the patients in the present study following therapy with the study drugs. The fixed dose combination of atorvastatin with metformin was well tolerated with mostly gastro-intestinal adverse events being reported in the current study. Moreover, most of the adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity and disappeared with continued treatment. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that, the fixed dose combination of atorvastatin 10 mg + metformin SR 500 mg is efficacious and well tolerated therapeutic modality in patients with diabetic dyslipidaemia. Furthermore this combination offers dosage convenience to the patient and by virtue of its dual mode of action is a useful addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for patients with diabetic dyslipidaemia. The objective of this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, 8-week study was to evaluate the comparative dose efficacy of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg compared with simvastatin 10, 20, and 40 mg, pravastatin 10, 20, and 40 mg, lovastatin 20, 40, and 80 mg, and fluvastatin 20 and 40 mg. Investigators enrolled 534 hypercholesterolemic patients (low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol > or = 160 mg/dl [4.2 mmol/L] and triglycerides < or = 400 mg/dl [4.5 mmol/L]). The efficacy end points were mean percent change in plasma LDL cholesterol (primary), total cholesterol, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations from baseline to the end of treatment (week 8). Atorvastatin 10, 20, and 40 mg produced greater (p < or = 0.01) reductions in LDL cholesterol, -38%, -46%, and -51%, respectively, than the milligram equivalent doses of simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin. Atorvastatin 10 mg produced LDL cholesterol reductions comparable to or greater than (p < or = 0.02) simvastatin 10, 20, and 40 mg, pravastatin 10, 20, and 40 mg, lovastatin 20 and 40 mg, and fluvastatin 20 and 40 mg. Atorvastatin 10, 20, and 40 mg produced greater (p < or = 0.01) reductions in total cholesterol than the milligram equivalent doses of simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin. All reductase inhibitors studied had similar tolerability. There were no incidences of persistent elevations in serum transaminases or myositis. This study compared the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin in patients with documented atherosclerosis treated to U.S. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) recommended low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration (< or = 100 mg/dl [2.59 mmol/liter]).
                For patients with advanced atherosclerosis, NCEP recommends lipid-lowering drug therapy if LDL cholesterol remains > or = 130 mg/dl (3.36 mmol/liter).
                A total of 318 men or women with documented atherosclerosis and LDL cholesterol > or = 130 mg/dl (3.36 mmol/liter) and < or = 250 mg/dl (6.5 mmol/liter), and triglycerides < or = 400 mg/dl (4.5 mmol/liter) participated in this 54-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled, treat-to-target study. Patients were titrated at 12-week intervals until the LDL cholesterol goal was reached. Number of patients reaching target LDL cholesterol levels and dose to reach target were evaluated.
                At the starting doses, atorvastatin 10 mg produced significantly greater decreases (p < 0.05) in plasma LDL cholesterol than the other treatments. Subsequently, the percentage of patients reaching goal at the starting dose was 32% for atorvastatin, 1% for fluvastatin, 10% for lovastatin and 22% for simvastatin. Atorvastatin-treated patients required a lower median dose than other treatments. Median doses at week 54 with the last available visit carried forward were atorvastatin 20 mg/day, fluvastatin 40 mg/day + colestipol 20 g/day, lovastatin 80 mg/day, simvastatin 40 mg/day.
                A significantly greater number (p < 0.05) of patients with confirmed atherosclerosis treated with atorvastatin reached the target LDL cholesterol concentration at the starting dose than patients treated with fluvastatin or lovastatin, and significantly fewer (p < 0.05) patients treated with atorvastatin required combination therapy with colestipol to achieve target LDL cholesterol concentrations than all other statins tested. Despite the demonstrated benefits of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction in reducing the risk of coronary heart disease, many patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy fail to achieve LDL-C goals. We compared the effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin in reducing LDL-C and achieving LDL-C goals in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.
                In this 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial (4522IL/0026), 412 patients with LDL-C 160 to <250 mg/dL received a 5-mg dose of rosuvastatin (n = 138), a 10-mg dose of rosuvastatin (n = 134), or a 10-mg dose of atorvastatin (n = 140) for 12 weeks; during the following 40 weeks, dosages could be sequentially doubled up to 80 mg if National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II (ATP-II) LDL-C goals were not achieved. At 12 weeks, 5- and 10-mg doses of rosuvastatin were associated with significantly greater LDL-C reductions than 10-mg doses of atorvastatin (46% and 50% vs 39%, both P <.001). At 12 weeks, both rosuvastatin dosages brought more patients to within ATP-II and European LDL-C goals than atorvastatin (86% and 89% vs 73% and 75%, and 86% vs 55%, respectively). At 52 weeks, compared with atorvastatin, both initial rosuvastatin treatment groups significantly reduced LDL-C (47% and 53% vs 44%, P <.05 and P <.001). Overall, more patients in the initial rosuvastatin 10-mg group achieved their ATP-II LDL-C goal than those in the initial atorvastatin 10-mg group (98% vs 87%), with 82% of patients treated with rosuvastatin achieving their goal at the 10-mg starting dosage without the need for titration, compared with 59% of patients treated with atorvastatin. Both treatments were well tolerated over 52 weeks.
                Compared with atorvastatin, rosuvastatin produced greater reductions in LDL-C, which may offer advantages in LDL-C goal attainment over existing lipid-lowering therapies. Dialysis patients have many underlying traditional and nontraditional risk factors that may predispose them to a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease. The effects of statins (eg, atorvastatin) on altering nontraditional lipoprotein measures in dialysis patients have not been extensively investigated.
                To evaluate the efficacy of atorvastatin compared with a control group in inducing changes in lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], apolipoprotein (Apo) A-1, Apo-B, and fibrinogen levels, as well as the conventional lipoprotein profile, in hemodialysis patients over 36 weeks; secondary objectives were to assess changes in C-reactive protein, albumin, and safety measures.
                Forty-five hemodialysis patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels greater than 100 mg/dL were randomized to parallel groups: atorvastatin (n = 19) or no treatment (n = 26). The atorvastatin dose was titrated from 10 mg to achieve an LDL-C goal of 100 mg/dL or less and therapy was continued for 36 weeks. Biochemical and lipoprotein laboratory tests for efficacy outcomes were obtained at baseline, 12 weeks, and 36 weeks.
                The atorvastatin group exhibited clinically significant reductions (mean +/- SD) compared with controls in total cholesterol (-21.7 +/- 41.7 vs -3.2 +/- 40.0 mg/dL, respectively; p = 0.017) and LDL-C (-13.1 +/- 32.0 vs -1.1 +/- 38.4 mg/dL, respectively; p = 0.058) levels, as well as Lp(a) (-10.6 +/- 27 vs 3.5 +/- 17.8 mg/dL, respectively; p = 0.046). Statistical analyses included analysis of variance on ranked measures for multivariable modeling and paired t-test to determine changes in efficacy measures between baseline and 36 weeks within groups.
                Atorvastatin was safe and effective in reducing Lp(a), total cholesterol, and LDL-C levels. Given the prevalence of atherosclerosis in hemodialysis patients, therapy aimed at reducing traditional and nontraditional risk factors may be beneficial. To compare the effects of different low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering statin treatments on small dense LDL (sd-LDL) in hypercholesterolemic patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS).
                Forty hypercholesterolemic MetS patients ?30 years of age were randomized to rosuvas-tatin (n=17) or other statins (n=23) groups. In the other statins group, those taking atorvastatin (n=12) were also evaluated separately. Statin doses were 10 mg/day rosuvastatin, 20 mg/day atorvas-tatin, 40 mg/day simvastatin, and 40 mg/day pravastatin. Treatment duration was planned to be 8 weeks. Sd-LDL levels were assessed at baseline and at the completion of treatment.
                After treatment, sd-LDL levels were significantly reduced in all 3 groups (from 29.6+/-24.8 mg/dL to 8.9+/-8.5 mg/dL in the rosuvastatin group, p=0.001; from 26.2+/-15 mg/dL to 14.8+/-9.6 mg/dL in the atorvastatin group, p=0.02; and from 29.1+/-16.5 mg/dL to 14.7+/-11.2 mg/dL in the other statins group, p=0.0001). There was no significant difference in the mean percent changes among groups.
                Significant reduction in sd-LDL levels was observed after 8 weeks of statin treatment in hypercholesterolemic patients with MetS. This effect was similar for all statins and can be considered a class effect. The 6-week efficacy and safety of atorvastatin versus simvastatin was determined during a 54-week, open-label, multicenter, parallel-arm, treat-to-target study. In all, 1,424 patients with mixed dyslipidemia (triglyceride 200 to 600 mg/dl [2.26 to 6.77 mmol/L]) were stratified to 1 of 2 groups (diabetes or no diabetes). Patients were then randomized to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg/ day (n = 730) or simvastatin 10 mg/day (n = 694). Efficacy was determined by measuring changes from baseline in lipid parameters including low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B. Compared with simvastatin, atorvastatin produced significantly greater (p < 0.0001) reductions from baseline in LDL cholesterol (37.2% vs 29.6%), total cholesterol (27.6% vs 21.5%), triglycerides (22.1% vs 16.0%), the ratio of LDL cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (41.1% vs 33.7%), and apolipoprotein B (28.3% vs 21.2%), and a comparable increase from baseline in HDL cholesterol (7.4% vs 6.9%). Atorvastatin was also significantly (p < 0.0001) more effective than simvastatin at treating the overall patient population to LDL cholesterol goals (55.6% vs 38.4%). Fewer than 6% of patients in either treatment group experienced drug-attributable adverse events, which were mostly mild to moderate in nature. Diabetic patients treated with either statin had safety characteristics similar to nondiabetics, with atorvastatin exhibiting superior efficacy to simvastatin. In conclusion, atorvastatin, at a dose of 10 mg/day, is more effective than simvastatin 10 mg/day at lowering lipids and reaching LDL cholesterol goals in patients with mixed dyslipidemia. Both statins are well tolerated with safety profiles similar to other members of the statin class. Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HFH) is a common genetic disorder that confers a significantly increased risk of early coronary artery disease. This study compared atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in HFH in a global, 18-week, weighted-randomization, double-blind, parallel-group, forced-titration study. Following a 6-week diet lead-in, 623 patients were randomized to 20 mg/day of atorvastatin (n = 187) or rosuvastatin (n = 436) with forced titration at 6-week intervals to 80 mg/day. The primary end point was percentage change in LDL cholesterol from baseline to week 18. At week 18, rosuvastatin therapy produced a significantly greater reduction in LDL cholesterol than atorvastatin (-57.9% vs -50.4%; p <0.001) and a significantly greater increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (12.4% vs 2.9%; p <0.001). Rosuvastatin also produced significantly greater reductions in apolipoprotein-B and all 4 major lipid ratios, as well as a significantly greater increases in apolipoprotein A-I (all p <0.001). More patients with HFH with coronary artery disease achieved the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III goal of LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dl (<2.6 mmol/L) on rosuvastatin 40 and 80 mg than atorvastatin 80 mg (17%, 24%, and 4.5%, respectively). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein median values were reduced by 33% to 34% in both the 80-mg rosuvastatin- and atorvastatin-treated groups. Both treatments were well tolerated. Thus, in HFH, rosuvastatin force titrated from 20 to 80 mg/day produced significantly greater reductions than atorvastatin 20 to 80 mg/day in LDL cholesterol and improvements in HDL cholesterol and other lipid parameters, and enabled more patients to achieve LDL cholesterol goals. Individuals with chronic renal disease are at high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and therefore the management of dyslipidemia is particularly important in this patient population. This double-blind randomized study investigated the efficacy and safety of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients with dyslipidemia.
                Following a two- to four-week baseline period, patients with low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol > or =3.5 mmol/L (135 mg/dL) were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg (N = 82) or placebo (N = 95) for 16 weeks. If LDL-cholesterol remained > or =3.5 mmol/L, the dose of atorvastatin was titrated to 20 mg and 40 mg after four and eight weeks, respectively.
                After four weeks a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving atorvastatin 10 mg had achieved the LDL-cholesterol goal < or =3.5 mmol/L compared with patients receiving placebo (85.4% vs. 16.0%; P < or = 0.001). The statistically significant difference between the two groups was maintained at week 8 and week 16 (P < or = 0.001 at both time points). At week 16, patients receiving atorvastatin had significantly greater reductions from baseline in LDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides and total cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol ratio (all P = 0.0001), and a significantly greater increase from baseline in HDL-cholesterol (P = 0.001) than patients receiving placebo. The overall adverse event profile for atorvastatin was similar to that observed with placebo.
                Atorvastatin was effective in achieving target LDL-cholesterol levels in a high proportion of the dyslipidemic CAPD patients studied at doses that are well tolerated. The lipid-modifying effects of statin therapy in hypercholesterolemic African-Americans have not been well characterized. This study compared the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin treatment for 6 weeks in hypercholesterolemic African-American adults. In the African American Rosuvastatin Investigation of Efficacy and Safety (ARIES) trial (4522US/0002), 774 adult African-Americans with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol > or = 160 and < or = 300 mg/dl and triglycerides < 400 mg/dl were randomized to receive open-label rosuvastatin 10 or 20 mg or atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg for 6 weeks. At week 6, significantly greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B concentrations, as well as lipoprotein and apolipoprotein ratios, were seen with rosuvastatin versus milligram-equivalent atorvastatin doses (analysis of variance with Bonferroni-adjusted critical p < 0.017 for all comparisons). Rosuvastatin 10 mg also increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol significantly more than atorvastatin 20 mg (p < 0.017). Although statistical comparisons were not performed, larger proportions of rosuvastatin-treated patients than atorvastatin-treated patients achieved National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. The median high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were significantly reduced statistically from baseline with rosuvastatin 20 mg and atorvastatin 20 mg among all patients and with rosuvastatin 10 and 20 mg and atorvastatin 20 mg in those patients with a baseline C-reactive protein level > 2.0 mg/L. The 2 study medications were well tolerated during the 6-week study period. In conclusion, rosuvastatin 10 and 20 mg improved the overall lipid profile of hypercholesterolemic African-Americans better than did milligram-equivalent doses of atorvastatin. The efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and placebo were compared in patients with the metabolic syndrome.
                Patients with the metabolic syndrome with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > or =3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) and multiple risk factors conferring a 10-year coronary heart disease risk score of >10% were randomized (2:2:1) to receive rosuvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 10 mg, or placebo for 6 weeks. Subsequently, the rosuvastatin 10 mg and placebo groups received rosuvastatin 20 mg and the atorvastatin 10 mg group received atorvastatin 20 mg for 6 weeks. LDL-C was reduced significantly more in patients receiving rosuvastatin 10 mg when compared with those receiving atorvastatin 10 mg at 6 weeks [intention-to-treat (ITT) population by randomized treatment: 41.7 vs. 35.7%, P < 0.001; ITT population by as-allocated treatment: 42.7 vs. 36.6%, P < 0.001]. Significant LDL-C reductions were also observed in patients receiving rosuvastatin when compared with those receiving atorvastatin at 12 weeks (48.9 vs. 42.5%, P < 0.001). More patients achieved LDL-C goals with rosuvastatin when compared with atorvastatin. Rosuvastatin increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol significantly more than atorvastatin. Treatments were well tolerated.
                At equivalent doses, rosuvastatin had a significantly greater effect than atorvastatin in lowering LDL-C and improving the lipid profile and was well tolerated in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Our study compared use of atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin for lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration in patients at risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). The goal was to reach the LDL cholesterol levels recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP).
                A combined total of 344 men and women took part in this 54-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled, treat-to-target study. Patients were selected on the basis of their LDL cholesterol concentration and their risk for CHD. During treatment, doses were titrated at 12-week intervals to a maximum of 80 mg per day of atorvastatin and lovastatin, or 40 mg per day of fluvastatin and simvastatin, with colestipol added if necessary to attain the NCEP-recommended LDL cholesterol concentration.
                At the starting dose, atorvastatin decreased plasma LDL cholesterol significantly (P < .05) compared with the other reductase inhibitors, and the percentage of patients reaching target LDL cholesterol concentration at the starting dose was significantly greater in the atorvastatin group (P < .05). Overall, a significantly (P < .05) greater percentage (95%) of atorvastatin-treated patients achieved target LDL cholesterol concentration. The safety profile was similar among all reductase inhibitors tested.
                At the starting dose, a significantly (P < .05) greater percentage of atorvastatin-treated patients at risk for CHD reached the target LDL cholesterol concentration than patients with treated with other reductase inhibitors. Guidelines for the prevention of coronary heart disease call for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction as the primary target of treatment and reduction of triglycerides (TG) as an additional target.
                The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of atorvastatin and simvastatin to reduce LDL-C and TG concentrations and to meet 3 target lipid levels: LDL-C <or=2.6 mmol/L; TG <or=1.5 mmol/L; and both LDL-C <or=2.6 mmol/L and TG <or=1.5 mmol/L.
                The Treat-to-Target (3T) Study was a 52-week, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group study. Using the double-blind, double-dummy technique, adult patients aged 35 to 75 years with cardiovascular disease and dyslipidemia, defined as LDL-C concentration >or=4.0 mmol/L (>or=155 mg/dL), were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive once-daily oral treatment with 20 mg atorvastatin or 20 mg simvastatin. Fasting (12-hour) blood samples for the estimation of lipid levels and clinical laboratory values were collected after 4, 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. The dose was doubled after 12 weeks if the target National Cholesterol Education Program level of LDL-C (<or=2.6 mmol/L [100 mg/dL]) was not reached at 8 weeks.
                The intent-to-treat analysis included 552 patients (418 men, 134 women) randomized to receive atorvastatin and 535 (404 men, 131 women) randomized to receive simvastatin. The number of patients enrolled in the study allowed the evaluation fo the drugs' effects on TG. Patient demogrpahic characteristics were similar for the 2 treatment groups, and there were no differences in baseline lipid values. Compared with simvastatin, atorvastatin produced significantly greater reductions in LDL-C (8 weeks: -46% vs -40%, P < 0.001; 52 weeks: -49% vs -44%, P < 0.001) and in TG (8 weeks: -23% vs -14%, P < 0.001; 52 weeks: -24% vs -16%, P < 0.001). Compared with simvastatin-treated patients, a significantly greater number of atorvastatin-treated patients reached the LDL-C target after 8 weeks (45% vs 24%; P < 0.001). Fewer atorvastatin patients needed to have their dose doubled; nevertheless more atorvastatin patients reached the LDL-C target after 52 weeks (61% vs 41%; P < 0.001). Both statins were well tolerated. Muscular symptoms occurred in 12 patients (2.2%) in the atorvastatin group and in 13 patients (2.4%) in the simvastatin group.
                Atorvastatin 20 or 40 mg/d for up to 1 year of treatment was significantly more effective than simvastatin 20 or 40 mg/d in reducing LDL-C and TG levels and at achieving recommended lipid targets in this selected patient population with cardiovascular disease and dyslipidemia. Both statis were well tolerated. Previous studies have shown conflicting results on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction for comparable doses of pitavastatin and atorvastatin.
                To compare the efficacy of pitavastatin 1 mg once daily with that of atorvastatin 10 mg once daily on lipoprotein change, safety, and cost per percent LDL-C reduction.
                An 8-week, randomized, open-label, parallel trial was conducted in patients with hypercholesterolemia. One hundred patients were equally randomized to receive pitavastatin 1 mg once daily or atorvastatin 10 mg once daily; 98 completed the study. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study.
                Pitavastatin lowered LDL-C levels from baseline by 37% compared with 46% in the atorvastatin group (p < 0.001). The reduction of total cholesterol (TC) levels from baseline was significantly different between the pitavastatin (28%) and atorvastatin (32%) groups (p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the percentage of changes in triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels between groups. The percentage of patients who achieved LDL-C goals according to National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines was not significantly different between the pitavastatin (74%) and atorvastatin (84%) groups (p = 0.220). In addition, both regimens were well tolerated, with no patient developing an elevation of more than 3 times the upper normal limit of alanine aminotransferase or 10 times that of creatine kinase. The monthly cost per percent LDL-C reduction in the pitavastatin group ($0.77) was about 50% lower than the cost in the atorvastatin ($1.56) group.
                Although pitavastatin 1 mg daily was not as effective at lowering LDL-C and TC levels as atorvastatin 10 mg daily, the number of patients achieving their LDL-C goals with pitavastatin was comparable with the number using atorvastatin. Pitavastatin 1 mg once daily may be an alternative regimen with cost-saving benefits but without a significant decrease in therapeutic benefit or increase in adverse events in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Atorvastatin is a potent hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor that decreases low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, but little is known about its effects on LDL subtype distribution in different types of hyperlipoproteinemia. Thus, we evaluated the influence of atorvastatin (10 mg/d, 4 weeks) on lipid concentrations and LDL subtype distribution in patients with hypercholesterolemia (n = 9; LDL cholesterol, 227 +/- 30 mg/dL; triglycerides, 137 +/- 56 mg/dL), patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipoproteinemia (n = 11; LDL cholesterol, 163 +/- 34 mg/dL; triglycerides, 260 +/- 147 mg/dL), and controls (n = 10; LDL cholesterol, 116 +/- 20 mg/dL; triglycerides, 130 +/- 47 mg/dL). Cholesterol concentration was determined in 7 LDL subfractions isolated by density gradient ultracentrifugation before and during atorvastatin treatment. Atorvastatin decreased LDL cholesterol (-36%, -28%, and -41%, all P <.01) and triglyceride (-4%, NS; -2%, NS; -24%, P <.05) concentrations but had little effect on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (-1%, NS; +10%, P <.05; +6%, NS) in hypercholesterolemic, diabetic, and control subjects, respectively. In all 3 groups, a significant reduction in cholesterol in each LDL subfraction was observed. Large-buoyant (LDL-1, LDL-2) and intermediate-dense (LDL-3, LDL-4) LDL were reduced more than small-dense (LDL-5 through LDL-7) LDL in hypercholesterolemic (-45%, -35%, and -32%, P <.05) and control subjects (-48%, -44%, and -25%, P <.05), but in diabetic patients cholesterol reduction was uniform in all LDL subtypes (-32%, -27%, and -29%, P =.45). Thus, atorvastatin decreases cholesterol concentration in all LDL subfractions in hypercholesterolemic, diabetic, and control subjects. However, the relative reduction of individual LDL subtypes differed between these groups. This finding suggests that the effect of atorvastatin on LDL subtype distribution depends on the type of underlying hyperlipoproteinemia.
                Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company Patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease frequently fail to reach recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals, partly because statin doses are not titrated to optimal effect. The ECLIPSE study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of force-titrated treatment with rosuvastatin (10-40 mg) with that of atorvastatin (10-80 mg) in high-risk patients with hypercholesterolemia.
                In this 24-week, open-label, randomized, multinational, parallel-group study, 1,036 patients were randomized to rosuvastatin (n = 522) or atorvastatin (n = 514).
                At all time points, a significantly greater percentage of patients on rosuvastatin treatment achieved the NCEP ATP III LDL-C goal of <100 mg/dl (2.5 mmol/l), the 2003 European LDL-C target of <2.5 or 3.0 mmol/l (100 or 115 mg/dl) and the LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dl (1.8 mmol/l), a goal suggested for very high-risk patients (p < 0.001 for all). Rosuvastatin also achieved significantly greater improvements in components of the atherogenic lipid profile versus atorvastatin. Both treatments were well tolerated.
                Rosuvastatin titrated across its recommended dose range provides a more favorable effect on lipoprotein variables than atorvastatin, enabling more high-risk patients to achieve recommended LDL-C goals.
                Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel. Statins and fibrates have different effects on lipid abnormalities of familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL); thus, the selection of the first-line drug is troublesome. We evaluated to what extent monotherapy with a potent statin is more effective than fibrate in reaching the recommended lipid targets in FCHL. Fifty-six patients were randomized to receive optimal dosage of atorvastatin (n = 27) or 200 mg/d micronized fenofibrate (n = 29) for 24 weeks. To reach the optimal dosage, atorvastatin was up-titrated at each follow-up visit if low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol >130 mg/dL (>100 mg/dL in patients with coronary or cerebrovascular disease). The effects of fenofibrate and atorvastatin on lipoprotein fractions as well as on plasma levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and adrenomedullin (AM) were also evaluated. At end of trial, a greater proportion of patients on atorvastatin (average dosage, 20.8 mg/d) reached lipid targets in comparison with those on fenofibrate (64% vs 32.1%, P = .02). Atorvastatin was significantly more effective in reducing total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Conversely, triglycerides decreased and HDL increased more during fenofibrate. Nevertheless, atorvastatin produced a marked reduction in very low-density lipoprotein and very low-density lipoprotein remnants. Atorvastatin lowered all LDL subtypes, although fenofibrate appeared to be more effective on denser LDL. Compared with 43 normolipemic controls, FCHL patients presented increased baseline plasma levels of ET-1 (P = .007) but not of AM. Fenofibrate, but not atorvastatin, significantly lowered ET-1 levels by 16.7% (P < .05). Neither drug significantly affected plasma concentrations of AM. In summary, although fenofibrate showed superiority in raising HDL and reducing ET-1, atorvastatin was more effective in reaching lipid targets in FCHL so that it can be proposed as the first-line option in the management of this atherogenic hyperlipidemia. The effects of atorvastatin (lipitor) on cholesterol-rich and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins were evaluated in this multicenter trial. Following a 6-week baseline period, 47 patients with elevated cholesterol and triglyceride levels were treated with atorvastatin 10 mg once daily (QD) for the initial 12 weeks (Period 1) increasing to 20 mg QD for the following 12 weeks (Period 2). At both the 10 and 20 mg doses, atorvastatin treatment resulted in significant reductions compared to pretreatment levels in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), apolipoprotein (apo) B, apoB in LDL (LDL-apo B), apo B in VLDL (VLDL-apo B), lipoprotein (Lp)B, lipoprotein B-complex (LpBc), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein triglycerides (LDL-TG), very low-density lipoprotein triglyceride (VLDL-TG), high-density lipoprotein triglycerides (HDL-TG), and apo C-III. Atorvastatin 10 and 20 mg QD also resulted in significant increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), apo AI, and LpAII:B:C:D:E. Due to its unique ability to normalize both cholesterol-rich and triglyceride-rich particles, atorvastatin is a promising candidate for monotherapy in a broad range of patients including those with varying degrees of hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. The primary objective of this 6-week, parallel-group, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial was to compare rosuvastatin with atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin across dose ranges for reduction of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Secondary objectives included comparing rosuvastatin with comparators for other lipid modifications and achievement of National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III and Joint European Task Force LDL cholesterol goals. After a dietary lead-in period, 2,431 adults with hypercholesterolemia (LDL cholesterol > or =160 and <250 mg/dl; triglycerides <400 mg/dl) were randomized to treatment with rosuvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg; atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg; simvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg; or pravastatin 10, 20, or 40 mg. At 6 weeks, across-dose analyses showed that rosuvastatin 10 to 80 mg reduced LDL cholesterol by a mean of 8.2% more than atorvastatin 10 to 80 mg, 26% more than pravastatin 10 to 40 mg, and 12% to 18% more than simvastatin 10 to 80 mg (all p <0.001). Mean percent changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the rosuvastatin groups were +7.7% to +9.6% compared with +2.1% to +6.8% in all other groups. Across dose ranges, rosuvastatin reduced total cholesterol significantly more (p <0.001) than all comparators and triglycerides significantly more (p <0.001) than simvastatin and pravastatin. Adult Treatment Panel III LDL cholesterol goals were achieved by 82% to 89% of patients treated with rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg compared with 69% to 85% of patients treated with atorvastatin 10 to 80 mg; the European LDL cholesterol goal of <3.0 mmol/L was achieved by 79% to 92% in rosuvastatin groups compared with 52% to 81% in atorvastatin groups. Drug tolerability was similar across treatments. Atorvastatin, a new enantiomerically pure synthetic statin, has shown a marked low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol reduction at doses ranging from 10 to 80 mg/d. This trial was designed to compare the efficacy of atorvastatin 10 mg with simvastatin 10 mg and 20 mg, the latter dose being commonly used in some countries.
                A parallel group, randomized, PROBE, multicenter study was conducted to compare the efficacy of 10 mg/d atorvastatin with that of 10 mg/d simvastatin and 20 mg/d simvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. After a 6-week diet-placebo lead-in period, 272 patients with LDL cholesterol > or = 160 mg/dL and triglycerides < or = 300 mg/dL were randomized to 6 weeks of treatment with atorvastatin 10 mg (109 patients), simvastatin 20 mg (109 patients), or simvastatin 10 mg (54 patients). In the main analysis, which tested the equivalence of atorvastatin 10 mg and simvastatin 20 mg, the mean percent change in LDL cholesterol for atorvastatin 10 mg (-37.0%) was greater than and not equivalent to simvastatin 20 mg (-33.8%). In the secondary analysis, which compared the efficacy of atorvastatin 10 mg with that of simvastatin 10 mg, the mean decrease in LDL cholesterol was significantly greater (P < .001) for atorvastatin 10 mg than for simvastatin 10 mg (-37.0% vs. -28.9%). The two drugs were well tolerated, with an incidence of clinical and biochemical side effects similar among the 3 treatment groups.
                In primary hypercholesterolemia, atorvastatin 10 mg was more effective and nonequivalent to simvastatin 20 mg and significantly more effective than simvastatin 10 mg for reducing LDL cholesterol levels. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 3 different statin regimens that have equivalent low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering efficacy on the apolipoprotein B/A1 ratio and glucose metabolism. After a 4-week dietary lead-in, 90 hypercholeserolemic patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups for 8 weeks: atorvastatin 20 mg, rosuvastatin 10 mg, or atorvastatin/ezetimibe 5 mg/5 mg. At drug treatment week 8, we compared the percentage changes in lipid parameters, apolipoprotein B/A1 ratio, hemoglobin A1c, and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) from baseline. Seventy-six patients completed the study and the percentage changes in LDL-C were comparable among the groups. However, the percentage reduction in the apolipoprotein B/A1 ratio was significantly greater in the rosuvastatin group (-47% +/- 14%, P = .04) and the combination group (-46% +/- 8%, P = .05) than in the atorvastatin group (-39% +/- 11%). The percentage increase in hemoglobin A1c was small but significantly greater in the atorvastatin group compared to the combination group (3.0% +/- 5.2% and -0.4% +/- 4.0%, P = .03). The effect of rosuvastatin on hemoglobin A1c was not different from those of the other 2 regimens. The effects of 3 statin regimens were similar on HOMA-IR. In conclusion, 3 statin regimens have differential effect on apolipoprotein B/A1 and glycemic control after comparable LDL-C reduction. At higher doses, simvastatin has been shown to produce significantly greater increases in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I than atorvastatin. To extend and confirm these findings, a 36-week, randomized, double-blind, dose-titration study was performed in 826 hypercholesterolemic patients to compare the effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin on HDL cholesterol, apo A-I, and clinical and laboratory safety. PRIMARY HYPOTHESIS: Simvastatin, across a range of doses, will be more effective than atorvastatin at raising HDL cholesterol and apo A-I levels.
                A total of 826 hypercholesterolemic patients were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized, parallel, 36-week, dose-escalation study. Patients randomized to simvastatin received 40 mg/day for the first 6 weeks, 80 mg/day for the next 6 weeks, and remained on 80 mg/day for the final 24 weeks. Patients randomized to atorvastatin received 20 mg/day for the first 6 weeks, 40 mg/day for the next 6 weeks, and 80 mg/day for the remaining 24 weeks.
                During the first 12 weeks of the study, simvastatin increased HDL cholesterol and apo A-I more than the comparative doses of atorvastatin, while producing slightly lower reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides. At the maximal dose comparison, simvastatin 80 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg, the HDL cholesterol and apo A-I differences favoring simvastatin were larger than at the lower doses. In addition, at the maximal dose comparison, the incidence of drug-related clinical adverse experiences was approximately two-fold higher with atorvastatin 80 mg than with simvastatin 80 mg (23 versus 12%, p < 0.001), due predominantly to a greater incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms with atorvastatin (10 versus 3%, p < 0.001). The incidence of clinically significant alanine aminotransferase elevations was also higher with atorvastatin 80 mg than with simvastatin 80 mg (3.8 versus 0.5%, p < 0.010), especially in women (6.0 versus 0.6%).
                At the doses compared in this study, simvastatin led to greater increases in HDL cholesterol and apo A-I levels than atorvastatin. At the maximum dose comparison, there were fewer drug-related gastrointestinal symptoms and clinically significant aminotransferase elevations with simvastatin. Diabetic dyslipidemia is featured by hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, and elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol commonly in the form of small, dense LDL particles. First-line treatment, fibrates versus statins or both, of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients has been the focus of debate. We investigated the potential hypolipidemic effects of atorvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor with good triglyceride lowering properties, in patients with combined dyslipidemia and evidence of impaired fasting glucose or type 2 diabetes. Twenty patients were recruited for the study, and after a 60-day wash out period, baseline measurements of lipoprotein parameters, LDL particle diameter, and apolipoprotein B (apoB) degradation fragments were obtained. The group was then randomized, in a double-blinded manner, into 2 subgroups. Group A received atorvastatin (80 mg) and group B received placebo daily for 60 days. After the first treatment period, all patients were reanalyzed for the above parameters. The treatment regime then crossed over for the second treatment period in which group A received placebo and group B received atorvastatin (80 mg) daily for 60 days. All parameters were remeasured at the end of the study. Treatment with atorvastatin resulted in a statistically significant reduction in total cholesterol (41%), LDL cholesterol (55%), triglycerides (TG) (32%), and apoB (40%). Mean LDL particle diameter significantly increased from 25.29 +/- 0.24 nm (small, dense LDL subclass) to 26.51 < 0.18 nm (intermediate LDL subclass) after treatment with atorvastatin (n = 20, P <.005). At baseline, LDL particles were predominantly found in the small, dense subclass; atorvastatin treatment resulted in a shift in the profile to the larger and more buoyant LDL subclass. Atorvastatin treatment did not produce consistent changes in the appearance of apoB degradation fragments in plasma. Our results suggest that atorvastatin beneficially alters the atherogenic lipid profile in these patients and significantly decreases the density of LDL particles produced resulting in a shift from small, dense LDL to more buoyant and less atherogenic particles.
                Copyright 2002 by W.B. Saunders Company Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary therapeutic target in the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines. This study tested the hypothesis that ezetimibe/simvastatin, a lipid-lowering agent that inhibits both intestinal cholesterol absorption and cholesterol synthesis, provides greater LDL-C reductions than atorvastatin across dose ranges.
                This multicenter, double-blind, 6-week parallel-group study randomized 1902 patients with LDL-C above ATP III goal to atorvastatin (10, 20, 40, or 80 mg) or to ezetimibe/simvastatin (10/10, 10/20, 10/40, or 10/80 mg). Patients were stratified by prerandomization LDL-C level.
                At each milligram-equivalent statin dose comparison, and averaged across doses, ezetimibe/simvastatin provided greater LDL-C reductions (47%-59%) than atorvastatin (36%-53%). Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 and 10/80 mg also provided significantly greater high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) increases than atorvastatin 40 and 80 mg. Triglyceride reductions were similar for all comparisons. More ezetimibe/simvastatin than atorvastatin patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalents attained the ATP III LDL-C goal of <100 mg/dL and the optional LDL-C target of <70 mg/dL. C-reactive protein reductions were similar between treatment groups. Consecutive elevations in alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase occurred in significantly more atorvastatin patients than ezetimibe/simvastatin patients. No myopathy or liver-related adverse events led to study discontinuation with either drug.
                Ezetimibe/simvastatin was more effective than atorvastatin in lowering LDL-C at each dose comparison and provided greater increases in HDL-C at the 40- and 80-mg statin dose. Ezetimibe/simvastatin is a highly efficacious, well-tolerated treatment option for hypercholesterolemic patients. Lipid targets can be difficult to attain in familial hypercholesterolaemia. To compare atorvastatin with simvastatin-fenofibrate and simvastatin-cholestyramine therapy, we studied 54 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia over periods of 2-6 months on each therapeutic regimen. The atorvastatin regimen reduced total cholesterol by 41.2 +/- 11.2%, LDL by 45.6 +/- 15.5%, triglycerides by 33.8 +/- 24.8%, and increased HDL by 2.3 +/- 37.0%. Simvastatin-fenofibrate therapy achieved reductions of 33.9 +/- 8.5% in cholesterol, 42.0 +/- 12.2% in LDL, 34.7 +/- 38.3% for triglycerides, and a 25.4 +/- 55.1% increase in HDL. Simvastatin-cholestyramine gave a reduction of 31.3 +/- 11.8% in cholesterol, 36.0 +/- 14.4% in LDL, 13.7 +/- 36.3% in triglycerides, and a 1.1 +/- 30.3% rise in HDL. The atorvastatin regimen was marginally but not significantly better than simvastatin-fenofibrate in improving the LDL:HDL ratio, LDL:apoB and and apolipoprotein B:A1 ratios. Eleven patients (20.4%) had side-effects: two discontinued atorvastatin due to side-effects; two patients had rashes; six had myalgia and two had diarrhoea. Gastrointestinal side-effects were described in 16 (30.1%) patients on simvastatin-cholestyramine therapy and four cases of myalgia (11.2%) were seen with simvastatin-fenofibrate. In nine patients on atorvastatin (20.4%) a 30% or greater fall in HDL was observed, compared to five patients with resin therapy (9.2%) and two with fibrate therapy (5.5%). There were no significant differences in liver or muscle biochemistry between the regimens, but atorvastatin did raise transaminase and creatine kinase concentrations significantly compared to pre-treatment values (p = 0.001). Atorvastatin significantly improves the lipid profile in most patients compared with other regimens. It has a comparable incidence of side-effects to combination therapy regimens. Although previous studies have examined the efficacy of pitavastatin, its tolerability and effects on lipid concentrations have not been compared with those of atorvastatin in a multicenter, randomized study.
                This trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of pitavastatin and atorvastatin in hypercholesterolemic Korean adults.
                This 8-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, dose-titration study was conducted at 18 clinical centers in Korea between May 2005 and February 2006. After a 4-week dietary lead-in period, patients with hypercholesterolemia were randomized to receive either pitavastatin 2 mg/d or atorvastatin 10 mg/d. Patients who had not reached the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal by week 4 received a double dose of the assigned medication for an additional 4 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated in terms of achievement of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III LDL-C goals and changes from baseline in other lipids and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). The tolerability profile was assessed by physical and electro-cardiographic examinations, laboratory tests, and recording adverse reactions at all visits.
                A total of 268 patients were randomized to treatment, and 222 (82.8%) completed the study (149 women, 73 men; mean age, 59 years; mean weight, 63.5 kg). At the end of the study, there was no significant difference between the pitavastatin and atorvastatin groups in the proportion of patients achieving the LDL-C goal (92.7% [102/110] vs 92.0% [103/112], respectively). In addition, there were no significant differences between groups in terms of the percent changes from baseline in LDL-C, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), or hs-CRP. Twenty-six of 136 patients (19.1%) taking pitavastatin reported 35 treatment-emergent adverse reactions; 33 of 132 patients (25.0%) taking atorvastatin reported 39 treatment-emergent adverse reactions. Elevations in creatine kinase were observed in 6 patients (4.4%) in the pitavastatin group and 7 patients (5.3%) in the atorvastatin group. There were no serious adverse drug reactions in either group.
                In these adult Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia, pitavastatin and atorvastatin did not differ significantly in terms of the proportions of patients achieving the LDL-C goal; reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol, and triglycerides; or increases in HDL-C. Both drugs were well tolerated. In this study, we aimed at comparing the effects of standard once daily 20 mg atorvastatin treatment with that of atorvastatin 20 mg administered every other day on serum lipids and high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels.
                Sixty-one patients with serum total cholesterol levels of above 200 mg/dl and low density lipoprotein (LDL)--cholesterol levels of above 130 mg/dl were included in this prospective, randomized study. The patients were randomized into daily treatment of 20 mg atorvastatin (standard treatment) and 20 mg atorvastatin every other day (every other day treatment) groups. Before the treatment and at each visit, serum lipids and hs-CRP levels of all the patients were measured. Statistical analyses were performed Chi-square, unpaired t and two-way repeated measurements ANOVA tests.
                In the every other day treatment group, there was a 36.1% reduction in LDL-cholesterol levels by the end of first month (p<0.01). At the end of three months there was further decrease of 10.2% in LDL-cholesterol levels when compared to 1 month levels (p>0.05). The LDL cholesterol levels of the group receiving 20 mg atorvastatin every day was reduced by %41 by the end of 1 month (p<0.01). At the end of three months, the difference between the changes in the all lipid parameters of the two groups was not found to be of statistical significance. In the group receiving the medication every other day, there was a 21% decrease in hs-CRP levels compared to the basal measurements at the end of first month (p<0.05). In the group, receiving the medication every day the decrease in hs-CRP levels at the end of one month was more striking (37%, p<0.05). However, the effects of both treatment arms on hs-CRP levels, did not differ significantly (p>0.05).
                Alternate-day dosing of atorvastatin causes a significant lipid-lowering and antiinflammatory effects similar to that of daily administration and yet may provide some cost savings. Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) has been shown to be poor in a number of surveys. In this open-label, non-comparative 17-week trial, 399 patients with existing CHD and LDL cholesterol concentration > 3.4 mmol/l (130 mg/dl) were treated with atorvastatin 10 mg daily. After 5 weeks, the dose of atorvastatin was adjusted according to a patient's LDL cholesterol level. Of the 379 patients remaining in the study after five weeks of treatment, dose titration was not required for 355 patients (94%) who had reached the target LDL cholesterol of < or = 3.4 mmol/l. Of the 23 patients titrated to higher doses, 11 achieved the target LDL cholesterol after treatment for 17 weeks. Atorvastatin was well tolerated during the course of the study. Achieving LDL cholesterol targets without the need for dose titration simplifies clinical management and should encourage better adherence to evidence-based recommendations for secondary prevention of CHD. Fasting plasma mevalonic acid (MVA), an indicator of in vivo cholesterol synthesis, was measured in 35 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) of whom 7 were treated with pravastatin 10-40 mg/day, 7 with simvastatin 10-40 mg/day and 21 with atorvastatin 80 mg/day. Reductions in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and MVA on maximal dose therapy differed significantly between the three drugs: 34.7%, 42.9% and 54.0% (P = 0.0001), and 31.6%, 48.9% and 58.8% (P = 0.004), respectively. Patients on atorvastatin were subdivided according to whether their reduction in LDL cholesterol on treatment was above or below the mean percentage change for the whole group. Basal values of LDL cholesterol did not differ significantly, but above average responders had a significantly higher mean pre-treatment level of MVA (6.2 +/- 0.60 vs. 4.3 +/- 0.61 ng/ml, P < 0.05) than below average responders. When all three drug groups were pooled above average responders showed a significantly greater absolute decrease in MVA on treatment than below average responders (3.85 +/- 0.48 vs. 2.33 +/- 0.40 ng/ml, P < 0.05). However, there was no significant correlation between the magnitude of the decreases in LDL cholesterol and MVA. These findings suggest that FH patients who responded well to statins had a higher basal level of plasma MVA, i.e. a higher rate of cholesterol synthesis, which was more susceptible to pharmacological inhibition. The more marked cholesterol lowering effect of atorvastatin 80 mg/day presumably reflects, at least in part, its ability to inhibit HMG-CoA reductase to a greater extent than maximal recommended doses of pravastatin and simvastatin of 40 mg/day. To explore the effect of short-term cholesterol-lowering treatment with atorvastatin on erythrocyte sodium-lithium countertransport (Na(+)/Li(+) CT) activity.
                Group A consisted of 30 patients (14 men) with mild essential hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP), 140-159 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP, 90-99 mm Hg) and primary hypercholesterolemia low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol >4.1 mmol/l and triglycerides (TG) <2.8 mmol/l), group B of 30 normotensive patients (16 men) with primary hypercholesterolemia, while 37 (18 men) healthy volunteers comprised the control group. After a 6-week dietary lead-in, all eligible patients were prescribed 20 mg/day of atorvastatin. Anthropometric data, blood-pressure (BP) measurements and determinations of lipid, non-lipid metabolic parameters (including homeostasis model assessment index, (HOMA-IR)) and erythrocyte Na(+)/Li(+) CT activity were collected at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment.
                At baseline Na(+)/Li(+) CT activity was significantly higher in group A and B compared with the control group and correlated directly with obesity indices, systolic and diastolic BP, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, TG, apolipoprotein B (apoB), HOMA-IR, uric acid and inversely with high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and apoA1. Systolic and diastolic BP levels, HOMA-IR and Na(+)/Li(+) CT activity were significantly decreased after atorvastatin treatment in both patient groups. The reduction in Na(+)/Li(+) CT activity correlated with baseline Na(+)/Li(+) CT activity and the changes in HOMA-IR values.
                Short-term treatment with atorvastatin for patients with hypercholesterolemia, and with or without essential hypertension, is associated with a significant reduction in the erythrocyte Na(+)/Li(+) CT activity, BP levels and insulin resistance independent of concomitant changes in lipid parameters. Statins reduce the incidence of strokes among patients at increased risk for cardiovascular disease; whether they reduce the risk of stroke after a recent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) remains to be established.
                We randomly assigned 4731 patients who had had a stroke or TIA within one to six months before study entry, had low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of 100 to 190 mg per deciliter (2.6 to 4.9 mmol per liter), and had no known coronary heart disease to double-blind treatment with 80 mg of atorvastatin per day or placebo. The primary end point was a first nonfatal or fatal stroke.
                The mean LDL cholesterol level during the trial was 73 mg per deciliter (1.9 mmol per liter) among patients receiving atorvastatin and 129 mg per deciliter (3.3 mmol per liter) among patients receiving placebo. During a median follow-up of 4.9 years, 265 patients (11.2 percent) receiving atorvastatin and 311 patients (13.1 percent) receiving placebo had a fatal or nonfatal stroke (5-year absolute reduction in risk, 2.2 percent; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.71 to 0.99; P=0.03; unadjusted P=0.05). The atorvastatin group had 218 ischemic strokes and 55 hemorrhagic strokes, whereas the placebo group had 274 ischemic strokes and 33 hemorrhagic strokes. The five-year absolute reduction in the risk of major cardiovascular events was 3.5 percent (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.92; P=0.002). The overall mortality rate was similar, with 216 deaths in the atorvastatin group and 211 deaths in the placebo group (P=0.98), as were the rates of serious adverse events. Elevated liver enzyme values were more common in patients taking atorvastatin.
                In patients with recent stroke or TIA and without known coronary heart disease, 80 mg of atorvastatin per day reduced the overall incidence of strokes and of cardiovascular events, despite a small increase in the incidence of hemorrhagic stroke. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00147602 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
                Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of statin therapy on lipoprotein particle concentrations in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Changes in lipoprotein particle concentration may predict the risk of coronary heart disease more accurately than lipoprotein cholesterol levels.
                Patients with dyslipidemia and the metabolic syndrome (n = 318) were randomly assigned in a double-blind study comparing 10 mg rosuvastatin (RSV), 10 mg atorvastatin, or placebo daily for 6 weeks. From weeks 6 to 12, patients in the RSV and placebo groups received 20 mg RSV, whereas the ATV group increased their dose to 20 mg daily. Lipoprotein particle concentrations were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, LDL cholesterol was measured by beta-quantification, and other lipoproteins were measured by standard methods at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Lipoprotein levels were compared by analysis of covariance.
                Statins reduced LDL particle concentration less than LDL cholesterol (-30 to -38 vs. -38 to -51%). Reductions were greater with RSV than with ATV (P < 0.05 for LDL particle concentration and P < 0.001 for LDL cholesterol). Most patients attained LDL cholesterol <2.59 mmol/l (100 mg/dl) at 12 weeks (80% with RSV and 59% with ATV; P = 0.003), but only 27% of patients receiving RSV and 19% receiving ATV attained the goal of LDL particle concentration <1,000 nmol/l (P = 0.07).
                In patients with the metabolic syndrome, statin-induced changes in LDL cholesterol do not accurately reflect changes in LDL particle concentration. Consequently, despite attainment of LDL cholesterol goals, these patients may retain considerable residual coronary heart disease risk. Combined hyperlipidemia (CHL) is characterized by a concomitant elevation of plasma levels of triglyceride-rich, very low density lipoproteins (VLDLs) and cholesterol-rich, low density lipoproteins (LDLs). The predominance of small, dense LDLs contributes significantly to the premature development of coronary artery disease in patients with this atherogenic dyslipoproteinemia. In the present study, we evaluated the impact of atorvastatin, a newly developed inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMGCoA) reductase, on the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP)-mediated remodeling of apolipoprotein (apo) B-containing lipoprotein subspecies, and more specifically, the particle subpopulations of VLDL and LDL in CHL. In parallel, we evaluated the atorvastatin-induced modulation of the quantitative and qualitative features of atherogenic apo B-containing and cardioprotective apo AI-containing lipoprotein subspecies. Atorvastatin therapy (10 mg/d for a 6-week period) in patients with a lipid phenotype typical of CHL (n=18) induced reductions of 31% (P<0.0001) and 36% (P<0.0001) in plasma total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, respectively. In addition, atorvastatin significantly reduced VLDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and apo B levels by 43% (P<0.0001), 27% (P=0.0006), and 31% (P<0.0001), respectively. The plasma concentrations of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (VLDL1, Sf 60 to 400; VLDL2, Sf 20 to 60; and intermediate density lipoproteins, Sf 12 to 20) and of LDL, as determined by chemical analysis, were markedly diminished after drug therapy (-30% and -28%, respectively; P<0.0007). Atorvastatin significantly reduced circulating levels of all major LDL subspecies, ie, light (-28%, P<0.0008), intermediate (-27%, P<0.0008), and dense (-32%, P<0.0008) LDL; moreover, in terms of absolute lipoprotein mass, the reduction in dense LDL levels (mean -62 mg/dL) was preponderant. In addition, the reduction in plasma dense LDL concentration after therapy was significantly correlated with a reduction in plasma VLDL1 levels (r=0.429, P=0.0218). Atorvastatin induced a significant reduction (-7%, P=0.0039) in total CETP-dependent CET activity, which accurately reflects a reduction in plasma CETP mass concentration. Total CETP-mediated CET from high density lipoproteins to apo B-containing lipoproteins was significantly reduced (-26%, P<0.0001) with drug therapy. Furthermore, CETP activity was significantly correlated with the atorvastatin-induced reduction in plasma VLDL1 levels (r=0.456, P=0. 0138). Indeed, atorvastatin significantly and preferentially decreased CET from HDL to the VLDL1 subfraction (-37%, P=0.0064), thereby reducing both the levels (-37%, P=0.0001) and the CE content (-20%, P<0.005) of VLDL1. We interpret our data to indicate that 2 independent but complementary mechanisms may be operative in the atorvastatin-induced reduction of atherogenic LDL levels in CHL: first, a significant degree of normalization of both the circulating levels and the quality of their key precursors, ie, VLDL1, and second, enhanced catabolism of the major LDL particle subclasses (ie, light, intermediate, and dense LDL) due to upregulation of hepatic LDL receptors. To determine the effects of atorvastatin on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) particle size and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. Another objective was to compare the effects of atorvastatin on lipoprotein profiles as determined by direct versus indirect assessment of lipoprotein composition.
                Randomized, parallel-group substudy.
                Two university-affiliated outpatient hemodialysis centers.
                Nineteen patients with LDL levels above 100 mg/dl and with at least two cardiovascular risk factors.
                Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to atorvastatin 10 mg/day or no treatment (control) for 20 weeks.
                We compared the differences between LDL particle size and CRP levels at baseline and 20 weeks in the atorvastatin versus control groups. Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. Atorvastatin therapy was associated with no change in mean LDL particle size (p=0.23) and with a 90% decrease in mean CRP level (p=0.52). When evaluated by standard chemical analysis, atorvastatin therapy reduced total cholesterol levels by 29% (p=0.025) and resulted in nonsignificant reductions in LDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. Treatment with atorvastatin was not associated with significant changes in lipoprotein profile as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy.
                Treatment with atorvastatin did not affect LDL particle size but was associated with a sizable, yet nonsignificant, reduction in CRP concentrations. The drug had variable effects on lipoprotein concentrations as determined by chemical and NMR analytical methods. A larger study is necessary to provide definitive information on the effects of atorvastatin on LDL phenotype and CRP in patients with kidney disease. This multicenter, open-labeled, randomized trial was performed to compare the effects of rosuvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg on lipid and glycemic control in Korean patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome.
                In total, 351 patients who met the modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria for metabolic syndrome with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > or = 130 mg/dL were randomized to receive either rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 173) or atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 178) for over 6 weeks.
                After 6 weeks of treatment, greater reductions in total cholesterol (- 35.94 +/- 11.38 vs. - 30.07 +/- 10.46%, p < 0.001), LDL-C (48.04 +/- 14.45 vs. 39.52 +/- 14.42%, p < 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (- 42.93 +/- 13.15 vs. - 35.52 +/- 11.76%, p < 0.001), and apolipoprotein-B (- 38.7 +/- 18.85 vs. - 32.57 +/- 17.56%, p = 0.002) levels were observed in the rosuvastatin group as compared to the atorvastatin group. Overall, the percentage of patients attaining the NCEP ATP III goal was higher with rosuvastatin as compared to atorvastatin (87.64 vs. 69.88%, p < 0.001). Changes in glucose and insulin levels, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index were not significantly different between the two groups. The safety and tolerability of the two agents were similar.
                Rosuvastatin 10 mg was more effective than atorvastatin 10 mg in achieving NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals in patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome, especially in those with lower NCEP ATP III target level goals. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 52 centers in North America to compare the effects of the new, highly effective statin, rosuvastatin, with atorvastatin and placebo in hypercholesterolemic patients. After a 6-week dietary run-in, 516 patients with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol > or =4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dl) and < 6.47 mmol/L (250 mg/dl) and triglycerides < or =4.52 mmol/L (400 mg/dl) were randomized to 12 weeks of once-daily placebo (n = 132), rosuvastatin 5 mg (n = 128), rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 129), or atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 127). The primary efficacy end point was percent change in LDL cholesterol. Secondary efficacy variables were achievement of National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel II (ATP II), ATP III, and European Atherosclerosis Society LDL cholesterol goals and percent change from baseline in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and apolipoprotein A-I. Rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg compared with atorvastatin 10 mg were associated with greater LDL cholesterol reductions (-40% and -43% vs 35%; p <0.01 and p <0.001, respectively) and HDL cholesterol increases (13% and 12% vs 8%, p <0.01 and p <0.05, respectively). Total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B reductions and apolipoprotein A-I increases were also greater with rosuvastatin; triglyceride reductions were similar. Rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg were associated with improved achievement in ATP II (84% in both rosuvastatin groups vs 73%) and ATP III (84% and 82% vs 72%) LDL cholesterol goals, and rosuvastatin 10 mg was more effective than atorvastatin in achieving European Atherosclerosis Society LDL cholesterol goals. Both treatments were well tolerated. Previous studies have shown that effects on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) may differ among statins.
                A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-dose study was conducted in 917 hypercholesterolemic patients to compare the efficacy of 80 mg/d simvastatin versus 80 mg/d atorvastatin on HDL-C and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I for 24 weeks. Efficacy was assessed as the means of weeks 6 and 12 and weeks 18 and 24. Prespecified subgroups analyzed were patients with low HDL-C levels and with the metabolic syndrome.
                Simvastatin increased HDL-C and apo A-I values significantly more than did atorvastatin for the mean of weeks 6 and 12 (8.9% vs 3.6% and 4.9% vs -0.9%, respectively) and the mean of weeks 18 and 24 (8.3% vs 4.2% and 3.7% vs -1.4%). These differences were observed across both baseline HDL-C subgroups (<40 mg/dL, > or =40 mg/dL) and in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride reductions were greater with atorvastatin. Consecutive elevations >3x the upper limit of normal in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) occurred in significantly fewer patients treated with simvastatin than with atorvastatin (2/453 [0.4%] vs 13/464 [2.8%]), with most elevations observed in women taking atorvastatin (11/209 [5.3%] vs 1/199 [0.5%] for simvastatin).
                Simvastatin (80 mg) increased HDL-C and apo A-I significantly more than did atorvastatin (80 mg) in patients with hypercholesterolemia. This advantage was observed regardless of HDL-C level at baseline or the presence of the metabolic syndrome. Significantly fewer consecutive elevations >3x the upper limit of normal in ALT and/or AST occurred in patients receiving simvastatin. We investigated whether atorvastatin might decrease insulin sensitivity and increase ambient glycemia in hypercholesterolemic patients.
                Clinical trials suggest that some statin treatments might increase the incidence of diabetes despite reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and improvement in endothelial dysfunction.
                A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled parallel study was conducted in 44 patients taking placebo and in 42, 44, 43, and 40 patients given daily atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg, respectively, during a 2-month treatment period.
                Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg significantly reduced LDL cholesterol (39%, 47%, 52%, and 56%, respectively) and apolipoprotein B levels (33%, 37%, 42%, and 46%, respectively) after 2 months of therapy when compared with either baseline (all p < 0.001 by paired t test) or placebo (p < 0.001 by analysis of variance [ANOVA]). Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg significantly increased fasting plasma insulin (mean changes: 25%, 42%, 31%, and 45%, respectively) and glycated hemoglobin levels (2%, 5%, 5%, and 5%, respectively) when compared with either baseline (all p < 0.05 by paired t test) or placebo (p = 0.009 for insulin and p = 0.008 for glycated hemoglobin by ANOVA). Atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg decreased insulin sensitivity (1%, 3%, 3%, and 4%, respectively) when compared with either baseline (p = 0.312, p = 0.008, p < 0.001, and p = 0.008, respectively, by paired t test) or placebo (p = 0.033 by ANOVA).
                Despite beneficial reductions in LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B, atorvastatin treatment resulted in significant increases in fasting insulin and glycated hemoglobin levels consistent with insulin resistance and increased ambient glycemia in hypercholesterolemic patients. (Effects of Atorvastatin on Adiponectin Levels and Insulin Sensitivity In Hypercholesterolemic Patients; NCT00745836).
                Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. The efficacy and safety of atorvastatin 10 mg versus simvastatin 20 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg versus simvastatin 80 mg was determined in a 6-week, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point trial of dyslipidemic patients with and without coronary heart disease. A total of 1,732 patients with hypercholesterolemia and triglycerides < or =600 mg/dl (6.8 mmol/L) were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 650), simvastatin 20 mg (n = 650), atorvastatin 80 mg (n = 216), or simvastatin 80 mg (n = 216). The primary efficacy parameter was the change in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline to week 6. Secondary efficacy parameters included the percent change from baseline to week 6 in total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and the percent of patients achieving their National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) LDL cholesterol goal at study end. Atorvastatin had significantly greater reductions from baseline in LDL cholesterol than simvastatin in both comparator groups: atorvastatin 10 mg (37.1%) versus simvastatin 20 mg (35.4%) (p = 0.0097), and atorvastatin 80 mg (53.4%) versus simvastatin 80 mg (46.7%) (p <0.0001). Atorvastatin 10 and 80 mg also provided significantly greater reductions in total cholesterol, triglycerides, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B than simvastatin 20 and 80 mg, respectively (all p <0.05). All treatment groups had a significantly decreased LDL cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio from baseline (all p <0.0001). In both comparator groups a higher proportion of atorvastatin-treated patients reached their NCEP LDL cholesterol goal compared with simvastatin. All 4 study treatments were well tolerated. Few data are available on the effects of high dose statin therapy on lipoprotein subfractions in type 2 diabetes. In a double blind randomised placebo-controlled trial we have studied the effects of 80 mg atorvastatin over 8 weeks on LDL, VLDL and HDL subfractions in 40 overweight type 2 diabetes patients. VLDL and LDL subfractions were prepared by density gradient ultracentrifugation. Triglycerides, cholesterol, total protein and phospholipids were measured and mass of subfractions calculated. HDL subfractions were prepared by precipitation. Atorvastatin 80 mg produced significant falls in LDL subfractions (LDL(1) 66.2 mg/dl:36.6 mg/dl, LDL(2) 118:56.6 mg/dl, LDL(3) 36.9:19.9 mg/dl all P < 0.01 relative to placebo) and VLDL subfractions (VLDL(1) 55:22.1 mg/dl, VLDL(2) 40.1:19.1 mg/dl, VLDL(3) 52.6:30 mg/dl all P < 0.01 relative to placebo). There was no change in the proportion of LDL present as LDL(3). There was a reduction in the proportion of VLDL as VLDL(1) and a reciprocal increase in the proportion as VLDL(3). Changes in VLDL subfractions were associated with changes in lipid composition, particularly a reduction in cholesterol ester and a reduction in the cholesterol ester/triglyceride ratio. Effects on HDL subfractions were largely neutral. High dose atorvastatin produces favourable effects on lipoprotein subfractions in type 2 diabetes which may enhance antiatherogenic potential. The object of our study was to compare the effect of high-dose vs low-dose atorvastatin vs nonstatin-based treatment (cholestyramine plus sitosterol) on cell composition of carotid plaque.
                We recruited 60 hypercholesterolemic patients (total cholesterol, 5.83-7.64 mmol/L) eligible for carotid endarterectomy. Three months before surgery, patients were randomized into 3 groups (n=20) receiving atorvastatin 10 mg/day (AT-10) or atorvastatin 80 mg/day (AT-80) or cholestyramine 8 g/day plus sitosterol 2.5 g/day. Analysis of cell composition was performed on endarterectomy specimens.
                The 3 treatments resulted in a significant reduction of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), although the decrease in total cholesterol and LDL-C was of smaller magnitude in the cholestyramine plus sitosterol group. The 3 regimens did not influence the levels of inflammatory markers (including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein). Macrophage content was significantly lower in the AT-10 group plaques compared to the cholestyramine plus sitosterol group. It was further reduced in the AT-80 group plaques. These differences were no longer significant after adjustment for changes in LDL-C. No difference in lymphocyte number was observed among treatments, whereas the content of smooth muscle cells was higher in the AT- 80 group. An inverse association was observed between LDL-C changes in the 3 groups and macrophage content in the plaques.
                Short-term treatment with high-dose statin is superior to a nonstatin lipid-lowering regimen in reducing the macrophage cell content within atherosclerotic lesions, but this effect was determined by the degree of LDL-C-lowering. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin, a potent cholesterol- and triglyceride-lowering agent, in peritoneal dialysis patients with dyslipidaemia.
                Peritoneal dialysis patients with hypercholesterolaemia were treated for 4 months with atorvastatin at a starting dose of 10 mg. The dose could be increased to 20 or 40 mg in order to achieve the following targets: plasma LDL-cholesterol of 130 mg/dl for primary prevention of coronary heart disease, plasma LDL cholesterol of 100 mg/dl for secondary prevention, and plasma triglycerides of 200 mg/dl. Plasma lipid profile and liver and muscle enzyme levels were assessed at baseline and then monthly during treatment.
                Thirty-one patients with hypercholesterolaemia were included (16 males and 15 females; mean age 57+/-16 years; mean duration of peritoneal dialysis 27+/-17 months). Nineteen of the patients also had hypertriglyceridaemia and seven had diabetes. Twenty patients had no coronary history (primary prevention), whereas nine had experienced a coronary event (secondary prevention). In the primary and the secondary prevention patients, mean LDL-cholesterol levels (mg/dl) decreased significantly by 42 and 46% from 204+/-23 to 119+/-27 (P<0. 001) and 198+/-37 to 104+/-21 (P<0.001), and mean triglyceride levels (mg/dl) decreased by 37 and 26% from 289+/-132 to 186+/-92 (P<0.001) and 201+/-62 to 150+/-54 (P<0.001 respectively). Nineteen primary prevention and seven secondary prevention patients achieved the LDL-cholesterol target. The triglyceride target was achieved by 15 of the 19 hypertriglyceridaemic patients. Two patients stopped treatment (one because of gastrointestinal disturbances, the other because of an allergic skin reaction). After 4 months, there were no changes in enzyme levels.
                Atorvastatin is an effective and safe lipid-lowering agent for peritoneal dialysis patients with mixed dyslipidaemia. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was performed to determine whether atorvastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, could effectively and safely reduce plasma LDL-cholesterol concentrations in Japanese patients with type-2 diabetes without influencing glycemic control. The subjects were patients with hypercholesterolemia (serum cholesterol concentration > or =5.7 mmol/l (220 mg/dl)) and stable glycemic control. The fasting concentrations of hemoglobin A(1C) (HbA(1C)), fructosamine, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) were measured as indices of glycemic control. Plasma lipid concentrations and the safety of the drug were also examined. Forty eligible patients in two groups of 20 each were administered atorvastatin (10 mg/day) or placebo. Neither atorvastatin nor placebo caused a significant change in HbA(1C), fructosamine, or 1,5-AG concentrations. Atorvastatin significantly reduced total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol concentrations from baseline by 29.7% (p<0.0001) and 41.6% (p<0.0001), respectively. The incidence of clinical adverse events and that of abnormal changes in laboratory test values did not differ between the two groups. In this trial, atorvastatin effectively and safely reduced LDL-cholesterol concentrations in diabetic patients with hypercholesterolemia without influencing glycemic control. These findings are clinically important because there are many diabetic patients with hypercholesterolemia and such patients have a high risk of developing arteriosclerotic disease. In a multicenter, open-label trial, 696 Hispanic patients with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels > or =130 and < or =300 mg/dl and triglyceride levels <400 mg/dl at medium or high risk of coronary heart disease were randomized to receive 10 or 20 mg of rosuvastatin or 10 or 20 mg of atorvastatin for 6 weeks. At week 6, LDL cholesterol was decreased more by 10 mg of rosuvastatin than by 10 mg of atorvastatin (45% vs 36%, p <0.0001) and more by 20 mg of rosuvastatin than by 20 mg of atorvastatin (50% vs 42%, p <0.0001). Significantly greater decreases were also observed with rosuvastatin for total cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein-B, and lipid ratios compared with milligram-equivalent doses of atorvastatin. Overall, National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Program III LDL cholesterol goals were achieved by 78% and 88% of patients who received 10 and 20 mg of rosuvastatin and by 60% and 73% of patients who received 10 and 20 mg of atorvastatin, respectively. Among high-risk patients, the LDL cholesterol goal of <100 mg/dl was achieved by 74% and 91% of patients who received 10 and 20 mg of rosuvastatin and by 52% and 62% who received 10 and 20 mg of atorvastatin, respectively. All treatments were well tolerated, and adverse events were similar in frequency across treatment groups. No cases of myopathy or rhabdomyolysis were observed. In conclusion, treatment with rosuvastatin and atorvastatin produced beneficial lipid changes in this group of Hispanic patients that appear comparable in magnitude to those observed in primarily non-Hispanic white study populations. These benefits were accompanied by a favorable safety profile that suggests no concerns particular to this population. The ratio of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C/HDL-C) is a reliable predictor of cardiovascular risk. Low HDL-C levels in patients with coronary artery disease are associated with a high risk for cardiovascular events.
                This study compared the effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on the LDL-C/HDL-C.
                Patients aged 40-80 years with established cardiovascular disease and HDL-C < 1.0 mmol/L (< 40 mg/dL) entered as a 6-week dietary run-in period, before randomisation to open-label treatment with rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 230) or atorvastatin 20 mg (n = 231) for 6 weeks. Doses were increased after 6 weeks to rosuvastatin 20 mg or atorvastatin 40 mg, and after 12 weeks to rosuvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 80 mg. Serum lipid parameters were measured at baseline and 6, 12 and 18 weeks.
                After 6 weeks of treatment, mean percentage change from baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C ratio was -47.0% in the rosuvastatin group and -41.9% in the atorvastatin group (p < 0.05 for between-group comparison). After 12 and 18 weeks of treatment, change from baseline was -53.0% and -57.3%, respectively, for rosucastatin, compared with -47.9% and -49.6%, respectively, for atorvastatin (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively, for between-group comparison). Rosuvastatin also reduced LDL-C, total cholesterol/HDL-C significantly more than atorvastatin at all three time points, and significantly improved total cholesterol/HDL-C and apolipoprotein B/A-I ratios.
                Rosuvastatin 10, 20 and 40 mg is significantly more effective than atorvastatin 20, 40 and 80 mg, respectively, in improving the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio in patients with cardiovascular disease and low HDL-C. Further studies are required to clarify the benefits of rosuvastatin for reduction of cardiovascular risk. Type 2 diabetes is associated with a substantially increased risk of cardiovascular disease, but the role of lipid-lowering therapy with statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetes is inadequately defined. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of atorvastatin 10 mg daily for primary prevention of major cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes without high concentrations of LDL-cholesterol.
                2838 patients aged 40-75 years in 132 centres in the UK and Ireland were randomised to placebo (n=1410) or atorvastatin 10 mg daily (n=1428). Study entrants had no documented previous history of cardiovascular disease, an LDL-cholesterol concentration of 4.14 mmol/L or lower, a fasting triglyceride amount of 6.78 mmol/L or less, and at least one of the following: retinopathy, albuminuria, current smoking, or hypertension. The primary endpoint was time to first occurrence of the following: acute coronary heart disease events, coronary revascularisation, or stroke. Analysis was by intention to treat.
                The trial was terminated 2 years earlier than expected because the prespecified early stopping rule for efficacy had been met. Median duration of follow-up was 3.9 years (IQR 3.0-4.7). 127 patients allocated placebo (2.46 per 100 person-years at risk) and 83 allocated atorvastatin (1.54 per 100 person-years at risk) had at least one major cardiovascular event (rate reduction 37% [95% CI -52 to -17], p=0.001). Treatment would be expected to prevent at least 37 major vascular events per 1000 such people treated for 4 years. Assessed separately, acute coronary heart disease events were reduced by 36% (-55 to -9), coronary revascularisations by 31% (-59 to 16), and rate of stroke by 48% (-69 to -11). Atorvastatin reduced the death rate by 27% (-48 to 1, p=0.059). No excess of adverse events was noted in the atorvastatin group.
                Atorvastatin 10 mg daily is safe and efficacious in reducing the risk of first cardiovascular disease events, including stroke, in patients with type 2 diabetes without high LDL-cholesterol. No justification is available for having a particular threshold level of LDL-cholesterol as the sole arbiter of which patients with type 2 diabetes should receive statins. The debate about whether all people with this disorder warrant statin treatment should now focus on whether any patients are at sufficiently low risk for this treatment to be withheld. Vaspin and visfatin have emerged as novel adipokines, involved in atherosclerosis progression. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of atorvastatin and lifestyle modification on the above adipokines in hypercholesterolemic patients.
                One hundred four statin-free subjects with moderate cardiovascular risk (Framingham risk score of 10-20%) were randomly assigned to receive either atorvastatin 20mg per day (AT group, n=52) or lifestyle modification (LM, group, n=52). For comparison, age and gender-matched blood donors, without any chronic cardiovascular or metabolic disease served as healthy controls (HC group, n=40). Clinical and anthropometrical parameters, lipids, fasting glucose, serum vaspin, visfatin and insulin levels were obtained at the beginning and after 12 weeks.
                At the end of the study, intra-group and inter-group comparison revealed that atorvastatin administration considerably ameliorated most lipid parameters and downregulated hsCRP levels (p=0.002, p=0.041, respectively). Moreover, we observed a significant increase of vaspin concentrations after 12-week atorvastatin treatment (from 1.37±0.6ng/ml to 2.13±0.61ng/ml), as compared to baseline (p=0.007) and LM group (p=0.030). In standard multiple regression analysis, the atorvastatin-induced decrease of vaspin was independently associated with hsCRP reduction (p=0.015). On the other hand, within and between groups comparison revealed a non-significant (p>0.05) reduction of visfatin serum levels. In our study, lifestyle modification had totally modest influence on clinical and biochemical variables (p>0.05).
                In hypercholesterolemic patients with moderate estimated cardiovascular risk, atorvastatin administration reduced hsCRP and increased serum vaspin levels compared to lifestyle modification. The relation of those pleiotropic, non-lipid-lowering effects of statins with their clinical outcomes remains to be proved.
                Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Elevation of plasma cholesterol and/or triglycerides, and the prevalence of small dense low density lipoproteins (LDL) particles remarkably increase the risk in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL). There are, at present, inconsistent data on the effects of different treatments on size and density of LDL particles in FCHL patients.
                A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study was designed to evaluate the effect of 3 months' treatment with atorvastatin (10mg/day) or pravastatin (20mg/day) on the lipid/lipoprotein profile and LDL size in a total of 86 FCHL patients. Both statins significantly lowered plasma total and LDL cholesterol, with a significantly higher hypocholesterolemic effect observed with atorvastatin (-26.8+/-11.1% and -35.9+/-11.1%, respectively) compared to pravastatin (-17.6+/-11.1% and -24.5+/-10.2%). The percent decrease in plasma triglycerides was highly variable, but more pronounced with atorvastatin (-19.8+/-29.2%) than with pravastatin (-5.3+/-48.6%). Opposite changes in LDL size were seen with the 2 treatments, with increased mean LDL particle diameter with atorvastatin, and decreased diameter with pravastatin, and significant between treatment difference in terms of percent modification vs baseline (+0.5+/-1.6% with atorvastatin vs -0.3+/-1.8% with pravastatin).
                The present results support the evidence indicative of a greater hypocholesterolemic effect of atorvastatin compared to pravastatin, and in addition show a raising effect of atorvastatin on the size of LDL particles in FCHL patients. In March 2004, the Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (REVERSAL) trial demonstrated that intensive lipid-lowering therapy (atorvastatin 80 mg/d) reduced progression of coronary atherosclerosis compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy (pravastatin 40 mg/d). The following month, the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) study demonstrated the superiority of intensive (atorvastatin 80 mg/d) versus moderate (pravastatin 40 mg/d) lipid-lowering therapy for reducing death or cardiovascular events in patients suffering from an acute coronary syndrome. We sought to determine the impact of these 2 trials on trends in intensive versus moderate statin therapy in Ontario, Canada.
                This is a retrospective time-series analysis of statin prescribing between June 1997 and September 2004 in Ontario, Canada, for all residents age 65 years and older. The publication of the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 and REVERSAL trials was associated with a sustained and statistically significant increase in the number of prescriptions dispensed for atorvastatin 80 mg (range, 272 to 635 additional prescriptions per month), whereas the number of prescriptions filled for pravastatin 40 mg did not change. Similarly, it resulted in a temporal increase in the relative market share of atorvastatin at a dose of 80 mg versus that of atorvastatin at a dose of 40 mg. However, the proportion of simvastatin prescriptions for 80 mg relative to 40 mg did not change over time, implying a drug-specific effect rather than a class effect in prescribing practice.
                The publication of the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 and REVERSAL trials resulted in a significant sustained increase in the use of intensive compared with moderate statin therapy. This shift was evident primarily in an increased use of high-dose atorvastatin and did not appear to be generalizable to other statins. To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of pitavastatin with atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes and combined (mixed) dyslipidaemia.
                Randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, multinational non-inferiority study. Patients were randomised 2 : 1 to pitavastatin 4 mg (n = 279) or atorvastatin 20 mg (n = 139) daily for 12 weeks. Patients completing the core study could continue on pitavastatin 4 mg (n = 141) or atorvastatin 20 mg (n = 64) [40 mg (n = 7) if lipid targets not reached by week 8] for a further 44 weeks (extension study). The primary efficacy variable was the change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).
                Reductions in LDL-C were not significantly different at week 12 between the pitavastatin (-41%) and atorvastatin (-43%) groups. Attainment of National Cholesterol Education Program and European Atherosclerosis Society targets for LDL-C and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) was similarly high for both treatment groups. Changes in secondary lipid variables (e.g. HDL-C, apolipoprotein B and triglycerides) were similar between treatments. Post hoc analysis showed that adjusted mean treatment differences for pitavastatin vs. atorvastatin were within the non-inferiority margin at weeks 16 (+0.11%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -5.23 to 5.44) and 44 (-0.02%; 95% CI, -5.46 to 5.41) of the extension study. Both treatments were well tolerated; atorvastatin increased fasting blood glucose from baseline (+7.2%; p < 0.05), whereas pitavastatin had no significant effect (+2.1%).
                Reductions in LDL-C and changes in other lipids were not significantly different in patients treated with pitavastatin 4 mg or atorvastatin 20 or 40 mg. Pitavastatin may, however, have a more favourable effect on the glycaemic status.
                © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. In patients with mixed dyslipidemia characterized by increased triglycerides (TG), decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, monotherapy with lipid-altering drugs often fails to achieve all lipid targets. This multicenter, double-blind, active-controlled study evaluated ABT-335 (fenofibric acid) in combination with 2 doses of atorvastatin in patients with mixed dyslipidemia. A total of 613 patients with LDL cholesterol > or =130 mg/dl, TG > or =150 mg/dl, and HDL cholesterol <40 mg/dl for men and <50 mg/dl for women were randomly assigned to ABT-335 (135 mg), atorvastatin (20, 40, or 80 mg), or combination therapy (ABT-335 + atorvastatin 20 or 40 mg) and treated for 12 weeks. Combination therapy with ABT-335 + atorvastatin 20 mg resulted in significantly greater improvements in TG (-45.6% vs -16.5%) and HDL cholesterol (14.0% vs 6.3%) compared with atorvastatin 20 mg and LDL cholesterol (-33.7% vs -3.4%) compared with ABT-335. Similarly, significantly greater improvements were observed with ABT-335 + atorvastatin 40 mg in TG (-42.1% vs -23.2%) and HDL cholesterol (12.6% vs 5.3%) compared with atorvastatin 40 mg and LDL cholesterol (-35.4% vs -3.4%) compared with ABT-335 monotherapy. Combination therapy also improved multiple secondary variables. Combination therapy was generally well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with those of ABT-335 and atorvastatin monotherapies. No rhabdomyolysis was reported. In conclusion, ABT-335 + atorvastatin combination therapy resulted in more effective control of multiple lipid parameters than either monotherapy and may be an appropriate therapy for patients with mixed dyslipidemia. Aggressive treatment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) fails to prevent most cardiovascular (CV) events. Concurrent treatment of LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides (TG) should be considered in patients with dyslipidemia.
                The efficacy and safety of a proprietary niacin extended-release and simvastatin (NER/S) combination were compared to atorvastatin monotherapy in a multicenter, Prospective, Randomized (3:2), Open-label, Blinded Endpoint (PROBE) study.
                Following ≥4 weeks without lipid-modifying therapies, 193 patients with dyslipidemia were treated with NER/S (n = 114; 1000/40 mg/day, weeks 1 to 4; 2000/40 mg/day weeks 5 to 12) or atorvastatin (n = 79; 40 mg/day, weeks 1 to 12).
                Compared to atorvastatin, NER/S had a larger beneficial effect on HDL-C (primary end point: 30.1 ± 2.3% and 9.4 ± 2.6%, respectively; P <.001), TG (P = .02), and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]; P <.001), and similar effects on LDL-C and non-HDL-C. Two-thirds of patients treated with NER/S concurrently attained LDL-C (CV risk-adjusted goals), HDL-C (≥40 mg/dL), and TG (<150 mg/dL) targets, compared to one-third of patients treated with atorvastatin (P <.001). Flushing was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) (67.5% NER/S and 10.1% atorvastatin; P <.001). Seventy-five percent of flushing episodes were mild to moderate. More patients treated with NER/S discontinued due to TEAEs (21.1% and 3.8%; P <.001); the most common TEAE was flushing.
                Compared to atorvastatin, NER/S provided superior improvements in HDL-C, TG, and Lp(a) and comparable improvements in non-HDL-C and LDL-C. Treatment with NER/S should be considered for patients with dyslipidemia requiring comprehensive lipid control. C3 complement is produced in response to macrophage activation and is a reliable marker of the risk of myocardial infarction in men. This study was designed to ascertain whether the treatment with atorvastatin, a powerful cholesterol lowering drug, and/or vitamin E, a natural antioxidant, may induce a short term decrease in serum C3 in subjects with persistently elevated levels. From an initial random sample of 1100 men aged 55-64 years, 140 subjects with 3 consecutive C3 measurements in the high tertile (>1.19 g/l) were selected. Those with total cholesterol <5.56 mmol/l were double blindly randomized in groups 1 (placebo, N = 28, G1) and 2 (vitamin E 600 IU/day, N= 30, G2). The subjects with total cholesterol values >5.56 mmol/l were randomized in groups 3 (placebo, N= 30, G3), 4 (atorvastatin 10 mg/day, N = 27, G4) and 5 (atorvastatin 10 mg/day + vitamin E 600 IU/day, N = 25, G5). After 3 months C3 levels were substantially unchanged in the first 4 groups, while in G5 a very significant decrement occurred: -0.070 g/l (5.2%); 95% CI 0.043-0.098; p <0.0001. "Normal" levels of C3 (< 1.19 g/l) were reached by 28% of G5 subjects. In G2 and G5 vitamin E levels increased by 60 and 36%, while in G4 they decreased by 23% (p < 0.0001), paralleling cholesterol and triglyceride fall. In all groups a progressive decrease in HDL cholesterol occurred (-17%, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, treatment with atorvastatin plus vitamin E for three months can lower persistently elevated C3 levels. To compare the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin and atorvastatin in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia.
                Japanese patients with total cholesterol (TC) > or = 220 mg/dL were randomized to receive pitavastatin 2 mg (n=126) or atorvastatin 10 mg (n=125) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent change from baseline in non-HDL-C level after 12 weeks of treatment. Reduction of non-HDL-C by pitavastatin treatment (39.0%, P=0.456 vs. atorvastatin) was non-inferior to that by atorvastatin (40.3%). Both pitavastatin and atorvastatin also significantly reduced LDL-C by 42.6% and 44.1%, TC by 29.7% and 31.1%, and TG by 17.3% and 10.7%, respectively, at 12 weeks without intergroup differences. HDL-C showed a significant increase at 12 weeks with pitavastatin treatment (3.2%, P=0.033 vs. baseline) but not with atorvastatin treatment (1.7%, P=0.221 vs. baseline). Waist circumference, body weight and BMI were significantly correlated with percent reduction of non-HDL-C in the atorvastatin group, whereas pitavastatin showed consistent reduction of non-HDL-C regardless of the body size. In patients with metabolic syndrome, LDL-C was reduced significantly more in patients receiving pitavastatin when compared with those receiving atorvastatin. AST, ALT and gammaGTP increased significantly in patients receiving atorvastatin but not in those receiving pitavastatin. Both treatments were well tolerated.
                Pitavastatin 2 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg are equally effective in improving the lipid profile and were well tolerated in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia. Patients with end-stage renal disease commonly present with an atherogenic lipid profile characterized by the accumulation of triglyceride-rich, apoprotein B-containing "remnant" lipoproteins, small dense low-density lipoprotein, and low levels of high-density lipoprotein. They are at increased cardiovascular risk and may benefit from drastic lipid-lowering treatment with atorvastatin, a potent, broadacting lipid regulator. This study aims to assess the effects of atorvastatin on the lipid profile in hemodialysis patients, to determine wether atorvastatin is also effective at lowering lipid levels in this particular high-risk subgroup.
                In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in hemodialysis patients with hypercholesterolemia (n = 42, mean total cholesterol 243 +/- 33 mg/dl (6.3 +/- 0.8 mmol/l)), the efficacy of 4-weekly increasing doses of atorvastatin (10 - 40 mg daily) was investigated. Lipids and apoproteins were measured in plasma and isolated lipoprotein fractions.
                Mean total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol progressively decreased with increasing doses of atorvastatin (total cholesterol -33%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol -43% after 12 weeks), while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol remained unchanged. Plasma levels of apoprotein B and apoprotein E were also significantly reduced by atorvastatin 10 mg, while up-titration to 20 and 40 mg daily provided additional benefits by lowering triglycerides and apoprotein C-III. At week 12, the fraction of small dense low-density lipoprotein was significantly reduced from 23% - 18%, and apoprotein B-containing intermediate-density lipoproteins were no longer detectable.
                In conclusion, atorvastatin not only treated hypercholesterolemia but also favorably affected the uremic lipid profile in patients on hemodialysis. Atorvastatin 4-weekly dose escalation up to 40 mg daily was well-tolerated. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this improved lipid profile on morbidity and mortality. . The beneficial effects of statins on clinical events may involve mechanisms that modify endothelial dysfunction, plaque stability, thrombus formation, and inflammatory responses. To determine the effect of atorvastatin on blood rheology in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), we prospectively studied serum lipid concentration, red cell cholesterol content, lipid peroxidation and erythrocyte membrane fluidity. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the effects of atorvastatin therapy on the erythrocyte membrane structure and the hypolipemic efficacy in patients with FH. MATERIALS, METHODS AND SUBJECTS STUDIED:. The study involved 31 patients with FH and 20 healthy individuals as a control group. The program lasted 20 weeks. For the first 8 weeks, the patients were on a hypolipemic diet only and for the subsequent 12 weeks, alongside the diet they were given 10 mg atorvastatin per day. Laboratory tests were carried out before and after 4 weeks and 12 weeks of the pharmacological treatment. Erythrocyte membrane fluidity was determined using the spin labeled method. The peroxidation of lipids was measured in whole erythrocytes as well as in erythrocyte plasma membranes by means of the thiobarbituric acid technique.
                . Treatment with atorvastatin reduced serum total cholesterol concentration from 310+/-29 mg/dl in a basal situation to 203+/-34 mg/dl ( P<0.001) at the end of the treatment and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration from 225+/-30 mg/dl to 126+/-30 mg/dl ( P<0.001), respectively. The changes observed in the plasma lipids correlate with a significant decrease in erythrocyte membrane cholesterol, from 2.24+/-1.69 to 1.17+/-0.75 mg/mg protein ( P<0.001) after 12 weeks of treatment. The lipid peroxidation in membranes of erythrocytes was lowered from the basal value 0.171+/-0.097 to 0.100+/-0.024 mmol/mg protein ( P<0.05) after 4 weeks of treatment and to 0.057+/-0.020 mmol/mg protein ( P<0.001) after 12 weeks of treatment, and in total erythrocytes from 4.78+/-1.49 to 3.99+/-1.39 mmol/g Hb ( P<0.02) and 2.43+/-0.87 mmol/g Hb ( P<0.001), respectively. The membrane fluidity was estimated by means of parameter S at the depth of the fifth carbon atom. Atorvastatin in hypercholesterolemic erythrocytes enhances the fluidity of the superficial layer from 0.758+/-0.009 up to the values observed in the control group 0.744+/-0.009 ( P<0.001). There is no impact on the microviscosity of the hydrophobic core observed.
                . Our findings suggest that the atorvastatin therapy reverses the alteration of erythrocyte plasma membrane properties. It may improve blood rheology in patients with FH. This improvement in blood properties may contribute to the well-known beneficial effects of atorvastatin on cardiovascular risk in patients with severe hyperlipidemia and atherosclerotic vascular disease. The AVALON study was a randomized, multicenter trial to assess the efficacy and safety of coadministered amlodipine and atorvastatin in patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia. Phase one was an 8-week, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled period whereby patients received amlodipine 5 mg, atorvastatin 10 mg, amlodipine 5 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg, or placebo. Thereafter, all patients received single-blind amlodipine 5 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg for 8-weeks, followed by 12 weeks of open-label treatment where doses could be titrated to improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and blood pressure control. A total of 847 patients entered the double-blind phase. At Week 8, 45% of the patients receiving amlodipine 5 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg reached both their blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals, compared with 8.3% with amlodipine (p < 0.001), 28.6% with atorvastatin (p < 0.001), and 3.5% with placebo. At 28 weeks, 67.1% of patients coadministered amlodipine and atorvastatin (mean doses, 7.6 mg and 28.4 mg, respectively) achieved both targets. Framingham estimated 10-year risk of coronary heart disease declined from baseline levels of 15.1% to 6.9% at Week 28. Following coadministered treatment, the adverse events reported were similar to either agent alone. Concomitant administration of amlodipine and atorvastatin is an effective and well tolerated treatment for coexisting hypertension and dyslipidemia. To study the influence of treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor atorvastatin on endothelial function in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia type IIa.
                Sixteen patients (5m/11w, 51-/+3 years) with familial hypercholesterolemia were studied before and after 3 months of therapy with atorvastatin 20 mg/day. EDRF release test (D.Celermajer, 1992) was used to assess flow-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery in response to reactive hyperemia. Plasma nitrite/nitrate (NOx) levels were measured as an indirect index of nitric oxide (NO) production in vivo using HPLC.
                Atorvastatin treatment resulted in a 32% reduction in total serum cholesterol (CH), 41% reduction in low density lipoprotein (LDL) CH, 16% reduction in triglycerides and a 21% increase in high density lipoprotein CH. Flow mediated dilatation (FMD) was impaired at baseline (5.8-/+0.9%) and significantly improved up to 9.5-/+0.9% after 3 month atorvastatin therapy (p<0.002). Change in FMD inversely correlated with baseline FMD (r = -0.58, p<0.05). There was no significant correlation between FMD and neither total serum CH nor LDL CH levels at baseline. During atorvastatin therapy significant reduction of plasma NOx levels occurred from 53.4-/+5.1 mcmol/l at baseline (range 42.6-86.2 mcmol/l) to 35.5-/+5.1 mcmol/l (18.4-46.0 mcmol/l) after treatment (p<0.02, n=7).
                In patients with familial hypercholesterolemia atorvastatin produced beneficial effect on endothelial function (increase in flow-mediated dilatation, decrease in NOx). Statin therapy has been found to produce substantial reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, resulting in a reduced risk for cardiovascular events. Recently, research interest has focused on modification of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels for the potential prevention of cardiovascular events. The effects of pitavastatin and atorvastatin on HDL-C have not been directly compared.
                This study compared the effects of pitavastatin and atorvastatin on HDL-C and other lipids and glucose metabolism in Japanese patients with elevated LDL-C levels and glucose intolerance. The tolerability of the 2 treatments was also compared.
                This was a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group trial. Patients with LDL-C levels>or=140 mg/dL and glucose intolerance (defined according to Japanese criteria for borderline diabetes and World Health Organization criteria for impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance) were randomly assigned to receive either pitavastatin 2 mg/d or atorvastatin 10 mg/d for 52 weeks. Levels of serum lipids and lipoproteins and measures of glucose metabolism (fasting insulin, fasting glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance) were obtained at baseline and at 8, 26, and 52 weeks of treatment. The effect of study drug on glucose metabolism was evaluated as a tolerability outcome. Tolerability was further assessed based on adverse events, either spontaneously reported or elicited by questioning; physical examination findings; and clinical laboratory test results. Study physicians rated the relationship of adverse events to study medication as unrelated, suspected, or probable.
                Two hundred seven patients were enrolled in the study, and efficacy was evaluated in 173 patients (88 pitavastatin, 85 atorvastatin). Thirty-four patients were excluded for reasons including failure to start medication or lack of >or=6 months of follow-up. Women accounted for 62% (108/173) of the evaluable population, which had a mean age of 63.3 years and a mean weight of 63.0 kg; 89% (154/173) had diabetes mellitus. The percent change in HDL-C levels was significantly greater in the pitavastatin group compared with the atorvastatin group (8.2 vs 2.9, respectively; P=0.031), as was the percent change in apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I (5.1 vs 0.6; P=0.019). The percent change in LDL-C levels was significantly lower with atorvastatin compared with pitavastatin (-40.1 vs -33.0, respectively; P=0.002), as were the percent changes in non-HDL-C (-37.4 vs -31.1; P=0.004), Apo B (-35.1 vs -28.2; P<0.001), and Apo E (-28.1 vs -17.8; P<0.001). The significant results for these parameters were unchanged when all 189 subjects who received>or=1 dose of study medication were included in the analysis, using last-value-carried-forward methodology. There were no significant differences between treatments with respect to the measures of glucose metabolism. Both statins appeared to be well tolerated. Adverse events occurred in 9% (9/96) of the pitavastatin group and 14% (13/93) of the atorvastatin group (P=NS). Two patients in the pitavastatin group and none in the atorvastatin group had an alanine aminotransferase value>3 times the upper limit of normal (P=NS).
                In these patients with elevated LDL-C levels and glucose intolerance, 52 weeks of treatment with pitavastatin 2 mg/d was associated with significantly greater increases in HDL-C and Apo A-I levels than atorvastatin 10 mg/d. Both treatments were well tolerated. This study aimed to determine the effect of atorvastatin therapy on plasma lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and biomarkers of inflammation in hypercholesterolaemic patients free of cardiovascular disease.
                In this three-month randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 63 hypercholesterolaemic patients were randomly treated with either placebo or atorvastatin (10 or 40 mg/day) for 12 weeks. Lp(a) and biomarkers of inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin [IL]-6 and -10, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha receptors [TNF-Rs]) were measured at study entry, and at four and 12 weeks of follow-up.
                At the end of the study, patients allocated to atorvastatin (10 or 40 mg/day) presented with significantly lower Lp(a) levels than those taking placebo (10 [1-41]mg/dL versus 6 [1-38]mg/dL [P = 0.02] and 21 [1-138]mg/dL versus 15 [1-103]mg/dL [P = 0.04], respectively]. In multivariate analyses, the relative changes in Lp(a) were independently related to baseline Lp(a) levels and CRP changes. No significant changes in CRP, IL-6 and TNF-Rs were observed. In contrast, IL-10 (pg/mL) increased significantly in patients taking atorvastatin (2.14 [0.49-43]pg/mL versus 4.54 [0.51-37.5]pg/mL; P = 0.01), and was even more increased with the 40-mg dose than with 10mg.
                Our results suggest that 12-week atorvastatin is effective in reducing Lp(a) in dyslipidaemic patients free of CVD. Furthermore, this is also the first evidence that the drug increases IL-10 in a dose-dependent manner.
                Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. To compare the efficacy of the newest cholesterol-lowering drug, rosuvastatin (RSV) with atorvastatin (ATV) in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
                A 24-week, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIIb, multicentre study.
                Diabetes outpatient clinics of 26 hospitals in The Netherlands.
                A total of 263 patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral agents or insulin, age (mean +/- SD) 60 +/- 10 years, body mass index (BMI) 31.4 +/- 6.1 kg m(-2), 46% males.
                After a 6-week dietary lead-in period, patients were randomized to RSV (n = 131) or ATV (n = 132) treatment in a dose escalation scheme (RSV: 10, 20 and 40 mg or ATV: 20, 40 and 80 mg for 6 weeks each sequentially).
                Primary outcome was the change in apolipoprotein B (apoB) and apoB/apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1) ratio, which has been suggested a better predictor for cardiovascular events than total (TC) or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Secondary outcomes were the changes in other lipid parameters.
                Baseline LDL-C in the RSV and ATV groups was 4.23 +/- 0.98 mmol L(-1) and 4.43 +/-0.99 mmol L(-1), whilst apoB/apoA1 was 0.86 +/-0.22 and 0.92 +/- 0.35, respectively. A greater reduction in apoB/apoA1 was seen with RSV (-34.9%, -39.2% and -40.5%) than with ATV (-32.4%, -34.7% and -35.8%, P < 0.05 at weeks 12 and 18). Significantly greater reductions in LDL-C were also seen with RSV (-45.9%, -50.6% and -53.6%) than with ATV (-41.3%, -45.6% and -47.8%, all P < 0.05). The American Diabetes Association (ADA) LDL-C goal of < 2.6 mmol L(-1) was reached by 82%, 84% and 92% of patients with RSV and 74%, 79% and 81% with ATV. Triglyceride reductions ranged from 16 to 24% and were not different between treatments. Both treatments were well-tolerated: nine patients in the RSV and 11 in the ATV group withdrew from treatment because of adverse events after randomization.
                In subjects with type 2 diabetes, greater improvements of apoB/apoA1 and across the lipid profile were observed with RSV compared with ATV. Simvastatin 40 to 80 mg/d has been found to increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels significantly more than atorvastatin at equipotent doses (ie, 20-80 mg/d). Data on the effects of lower doses of the 2 drugs on HDL-C levels are conflicting.
                The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of simvastatin 20 mg/d and atorvastatin 10 mg/d on HDL-C levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
                Patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol [TC] >250 mg/dL) who were not taking any lipid-lowering agents and who were following a low-fat diet were randomized to receive 1 of 2 treatments: simvastatin 20 mg/d or atorvastatin 10 mg/d. Serum TC, triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and HDL-C levels were measured using standard methods after 2 months of therapy. In a secondary analysis, lipids and lipoprotein cholesterol were measured after 1 year in patients who continued treatment.
                Of the 240 patients enrolled (108 men and 132 women; age range, 23-77 years, mean [SEM] 56.7 [0.69]), 235 completed the study. After 2 months of therapy, TC, LDL-C, and serum TG levels decreased significantly versus baseline in both groups (P < 0.001), with no significant differences between treatment groups. HDL-C levels increased by 9.0% (P < 0.001 vs baseline) in the simvastatin group and by 4.3% (P < 0.02) in the atorvastatin group. The difference between the 2 groups in the percentage increase in HDL-C was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In 113 patients who continued treatment, HDL-C levels at 1 year were still significantly higher than baseline levels in the simvastatin group (6.3%, P = 0.034), but not in the atorvastatin group (2.8%, P = 0.587).
                The findings from this study suggest that the HDL-C-increasing effect of simvastatin 20 mg is significantly greater than that of atorvastatin 10 mg. Since increasing HDL-C levels is thought to lower the risk for atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease, these results warrant further investigation. To compare the effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin on hemostatic parameters.
                Sixty-one patients with primary hypercholesterolemia without coronary heart disease were treated with atorvastatin 10-20 mg/d or simvastatin 10-20 mg/d. At baseline, 4, 12, and 24 weeks, lipid levels such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), triglycerides (TGs), and hemostatic parameters such as platelet counts, partial thromboplastin time (PTT) prothrombin time (PT), and fibrinogen levels were measured.
                At 12 weeks, the doses of the statins were increased to 20 mg/d in 10 of 35 (28.5%) patients treated with atorvastatin and 18 of 26 (69.2%) patients treated with simvastatin when the target level of LDL-C (130 mg/dL) was not reached. Mean doses were atorvastatin 12.8 mg/d and simvastatin 16.9 mg/d. After 24 weeks, 5 patients (14.3%) in the atorvastatin group and 4 patients (15.3%) in the simvastatin group had not reached the goal. In patients with diabetes, target level (LDL-C <100 mg/dL) was not reached in 35.7% of patients in the atorvastatin group and 44.4% of patients in the simvastatin group. Both simvastatin and atorvastatin were effective in lowering TC and LDL-C levels (p < 0.001). Atorvastatin lowered TGs significantly (p < 0.01). Neither atorvastatin nor simvastatin significantly reduced VLDL-C levels. HDL-C levels increased with atorvastatin, but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Platelet counts decreased with both statins nonsignificantly. Moreover, fibrinogen levels decreased with simvastatin and atorvastatin, but these reductions were significant only for simvastatin (p < 0.05). We detected prolongation of the PT with both drugs (p < 0.05); however, prolongation of the PTT was significant only with simvastatin (p < 0.001). Effectiveness of both statins on lipid and hemostatic parameters was dose related. Adverse effects were seen in 5 patients (14.2%) treated with atorvastatin and 3 patients (11.5%) treated with simvastatin. Elevations in serum transaminase levels >3 times the upper limit of normal and in creatine phosphokinase >5 times the upper limit of normal were not observed in any group.
                Atorvastatin was more effective than simvastatin on lipid parameters, although statistically insignificantly, while simvastatin produced more significant changes than atorvastatin on hemostatic parameters. The mean dose of simvastatin was greater than that of atorvastatin. Both statins had increased effects on lipid and hemostatic parameters when doses were increased. Atorvastatin and simvastatin were well tolerated. Different effects of statins on lipid levels and on coagulation parameters should be considered in patients with hypercholesterolemia and tendency to coagulation, especially in preventing thrombotic events. Further studies in larger trials are needed to confirm these observations. Atorvastatin reduces both plasma cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes, but mechanisms underlying triglyceride decrease and the effect of atorvastatin on high density lipoprotein (HDL) still remain unclear. Apolipoprotein (apo) E plays a crucial role in modulating production and clearance of triglyceride-rich very low density lipoprotein (VLDL). The main effect of apoAI is to modulate HDL metabolism. The aim of this work was to study the influence of atorvastatin on apoAI and apoE kinetics and to determine whether its hypocholesterolemic and hypotriglyceridemic effects could be related to changes in this apolipoprotein metabolism. Plasma VLDL-apoE, HDL-apoE, and HDL-apoAI were studied in seven patients with diabetes with mixed hyperlipidemia using a stable isotope labeling technique ([(2)H3]leucine-primed constant infusion) and monocompartmental model before and after 2 months of treatment with 40 mg/day of atorvastatin. Plasma apoE concentration was significantly reduced (44.1 +/- 19.1 versus 32 +/- 11.6 mg/l, p < 0.05) after treatment. This decrease was associated with a diminution of HDL-apoE concentration (17.46 +/- 6.71 versus 13.37 +/- 6.05 mg/l, p < 0.05) and production rate (0.202 +/- 0.085 versus 0.119 +/- 0.047 mg/kg/day, p < 0.05), whereas an increase in VLDL-apoE concentration (6.44 +/- 2.16 before versus 9.23 +/- 4.02 mg/l after, p < 0.05) and production rate (0.827 +/- 0.367 versus 1.524 +/- 0.664 mg/kg/day, p < 0.05) was observed. No significant difference was observed after treatment for apoAI parameters. We conclude that atorvastatin treatment promotes different apoE distribution between HDL and VLDL, favoring VLDL apoE content. The increased number of apoE per VLDL particle suggests that atorvastatin could enhance the direct catabolism of triglyceride-rich VLDL through apoE receptor pathways. The studies results of statin influence on hemostasis are various. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin on hemostatic parameters, such as activity of factor X, antithrombin III, fibrinogen concentration and Lp(a). 72 patients (pts) aged 40-65 were involved in the study; 49 of them suffered from hyperlipidemia II (hlp II) with the initial concentration of total cholesterol (TC) >200 mg/dL, cholesterol LDL (LDL-C) >145 mg/dL, triglycerides (TG) <400 mg/dL. The control group consisted of 20 healthy persons. The pts with hlp II who underwent 4 weeks long lipid lowering diet were randomized into two groups: I--27 pts treated with simvastatin (20 mg/d), II--22 pts treated with atorvastatin (10 mg/d). The active statin therapy lasted 8 weeks. The activity of factor X and antithrombin III (AT III) was estimated by amidolytic methods, fibrinogen concentration (Fb) by the Clauss method, Lp(a)-immunoenzymatic method. The mean values of factor X activity and Fb serum concentration were higher in pts with hip II than in the control group, the AT III activity was lower. The Lp(a) concentration didn't differ between groups. Statin treatment was associated with significant reduction of factor X activity. Both simvastatin and atorvastatin markedly increased AT III (87%, 98%) in comparison to the initial values. No changes of Lp(a) concentration were observed during statin therapy. Atorvastatin therapy significantly increased the Fb concentration (12.3%). Simvastatin treatment didn't influence Fb concentration. To compare the effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin 10 and 20 mg on plasma lipid and lipoprotein profiles in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and triglycerides < or = 6.0 mmol/l.
                A double-blind, randomized, multicentre study to assess the effect of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin, at 10 mg/day for 8 weeks followed by 20 mg/day for a further 8 weeks, on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), together with a range of secondary lipid and lipoprotein end points.
                Rosuvastatin reduced mean LDL-C levels from baseline over 16 weeks by 57.4%, while atorvastatin reduced mean LDL-C levels by 46.0% over the same period. The difference in LDL-C reduction between treatments was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Rosuvastatin also produced statistically significantly greater mean reductions from baseline in levels of total cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B and lipid ratios. More patients achieved European LDL-C (< 2.5 mmol/l) and total cholesterol (< 4.5 mmol/l) goals with rosuvastatin than with atorvastatin. Rosuvastatin was associated with a significantly (P < 0.049) greater mean percentage increase in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline compared with atorvastatin; however, patients in both treatment groups maintained good glycaemic control. Both rosuvastatin and atorvastatin were well tolerated.
                Greater reductions in LDL-C were achieved with rosuvastatin compared with equal doses of atorvastatin, enabling more patients with Type 2 diabetes to achieve European LDL-C goals. Information about lipid abnormalities and the effect of lipid lowering therapy in the early stage of renal disease is limited, while preventive treatment in this stage might be much more beneficial. Lipid profiles and risk factors were assessed in 150 consecutive, non-diabetic patients. Preventive therapy consisted of cholesterol-reduced diet and atorvastatin 10 mg daily. Patients were considered at risk for cardiovascular disease if LDL-cholesterol was >2.6 mmol/l in the case of manifest cardiovascular disease (n=28) or when they had manifest cardiovascular risk factors (n=105) or if LDL was >3.5 mmol/l (n=17). A total of 128 patients (85%) had increased LDL. In men <60 years and women <40 years, total cholesterol was higher than in the general population. Linear regression analysis showed a decreased creatinine clearance to be significantly associated with the lipid profile. For a 10 ml/min decrease of creatinine clearance, a 0.085 increase of the total cholesterol to HDL ratio was observed (P=0.005). In similar analyses, proteinuria was strongly associated with cholesterol and triglycerides. An increase of 0.28 of the total cholesterol/HDL ratio was observed for each gram per 24 h proteinuria (P<0.001). On atorvastatin 10 mg daily, 30 of 60 treated patients had achieved their target LDL value. On average, LDL-cholesterol was reduced by 39% and triglycerides by 18%. No patient had to interrupt their treatment because of adverse side-effects. In conclusion, the majority of patients had an elevated LDL and other lipid abnormalities. Short-term therapy with atorvastatin and a cholesterol lowering diet appears to be safe and effective. It is probably useful to determine the lipid profile in patients with renal failure already in an early phase and to start lipid lowering treatment as soon as abnormalities are found. National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines for patients at a high risk of coronary heart disease set a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of < 100 mg/dL. This target can be difficult to attain with diet and current therapy.
                In a 16-week multinational trial, 1993 high-risk patients were randomized to rosuvastatin 20 mg, atorvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 20 mg, simvastatin 20 mg, or simvastatin 40 mg for 8 weeks. Patients either remained on starting treatment or switched to lower or milligram-equivalent doses of rosuvastatin for 8 more weeks.
                At 16 weeks, more patients achieved their LDL-C target by switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg than staying on atorvastatin 10 mg (66% vs 42%, P < .001) or simvastatin 20 mg (73% vs 32%, P < .001). Changing to rosuvastatin 20 mg brought more patients to their LDL-C target than staying on atorvastatin 20 mg (79% vs 64%, P < .001) or simvastatin 40 mg (84% vs 56%, P < .001). More very high risk patients achieved an LDL-C target of < 70 mg/dL when changed to rosuvastatin from atorvastatin or simvastatin (within-arm comparisons P < .01). More hypertriglyceridemic patients (triglycerides > or = 200 mg/dL) met LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B targets by changing to rosuvastatin. Switching to rosuvastatin produced greater reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol, non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and lipid ratios. All treatments were well tolerated, with no differences among treatment groups in skeletal muscle, hepatic, or renal toxicity.
                Rosuvastatin 10 or 20 mg is an effective and safe therapeutic option for high-risk patients to achieve their lipid and apolipoprotein targets. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate LDL cholesterol-lowering efficacy, overall safety, and tolerability and the influence on growth and pubertal development of simvastatin in a large cohort of boys and girls with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH).
                A total of 173 heFH children (98 boys and 75 girls) were included in this study. After a 4-week diet/placebo run-in period, children with heFH were randomized to either simvastatin or placebo in a ratio of 3:2. Simvastatin was started at 10 mg/d and titrated at 8-week intervals to 20 and then 40 mg/d. During a 24-week extension period, the patients continued to receive simvastatin (40 mg) or placebo according to their assignment. After 48 weeks of simvastatin therapy, there were significant reductions of LDL cholesterol (-41%), total cholesterol (-31%), apolipoprotein B (-34%), VLDL cholesterol (-21%), and triglyceride (-9%) levels. HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I levels were increased by 3.3% and 10.4%, respectively (not significant). No safety issues became evident. Except for small decreases in dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate compared with placebo, there were no significant changes from baseline in adrenal, gonadal, and pituitary hormones in either treatment group.
                Simvastatin significantly reduced LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglyceride, VLDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels and was well tolerated in children with heFH. There was no evidence of any adverse effect of simvastatin on growth and pubertal development. Therefore, simvastatin at doses up to 40 mg is a well-tolerated and effective therapy for heFH children. To evaluate attainment of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal of less than 100 mg/dL with statin treatments in managed care patients at high risk for coronary heart disease.
                In a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial (SOLAR [Satisfying Optimal LDL-C ATP III goals with Rosuvastatin]) performed at 145 US clinical centers from June 5, 2002 to July 12, 2004, high-risk men and women in a managed care population received typical starting doses of rosuvastatin (10 mg/d), atorvastatin (10 mg/d), or simvastatin (20 mg/d) for 6 weeks. Those who did not meet the LDL-C target of less than 100 mg/dL at 6 weeks had their dose titrated (doubled), and all patients were followed up for another 6 weeks.
                A total of 1632 patients were randomized to 1 of the 3 treatment regimens. After 6 weeks, 65% of patients taking rosuvastatin reached the LDL-C target of less than 100 mg/dL vs 41% with atorvastatin and 39% with simvastatin (P<.001 vs rosuvastatin for both). After 12 weeks, 76% of patients taking rosuvastatin reached the LDL-C target of less than 100 mg/dL vs 58% with atorvastatin and 53% with simvastatin (P<.001 vs rosuvastatin for both). Reductions in the LDL-C level, total cholesterol level, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) level, and non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio were significantly greater with rosuvastatin at both 6 and 12 weeks compared with the other statins. Adverse events were similar in type and frequency in all treatment groups, and only 3% of all patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. No myopathy was observed, no clinically important impact on renal function was attributed to study medications, and clinically important increases in serum transaminases were rare.
                In a managed care population, 10 mg of rosuvastatin treatment resulted in more patients reaching the NCEP ATP III LDL-C goal compared with 10 mg of atorvastatin and 20 mg of simvastatin, potentially reducing the need for titration visits. To determine the effect of atorvastatin on postprandial lipaemia in overweight or obese women with the apoprotein (apo) E3/E3 genotype.
                Double-blind randomised, placebo-controlled 8-week single-centre study.
                Twenty-two healthy women, homozygous for apo E3 with a BMI ranging from 27.6 to 41.1 kg/m2 and normal or moderately elevated fasting triglycerides (53-184 mg/dl).
                After a 4-week isocaloric single-blind, placebo lead-in period, subjects were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (n = 7) or atorvastatin 20 mg once daily in the evening (n = 15) for 4 weeks.
                Atorvastatin significantly reduces fasting total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and postprandial triglycerides in obese women, homozygous for apo E3 with normal or near-normal fasting triglyceride levels. No significant effect on fasting triglycerides was observed.
                Atorvastatin decreases postprandial hyperlipidaemia, an independent cardiovascular risk factor, in normolipidaemic obese women. This effect of atorvastatin may, therefore, represent a cardioprotective mechanism. Hyperlipidemia is an important risk factor for atherosclerosis. Hemorheological factors contribute to morbidity and mortality in patients with dyslipidemia. We evaluated the effects of 3 antihyperlipidemic drugs (pravastatin, atorvastatin, and fenofibrate), which have different mechanisms of action and different patterns of action on lipid profiles, on erythrocyte deformability and fibrinogen levels in patients with type IIa and type IIb hyperlipidemia. Twenty-one patients ( 4 men and 17 women) with type IIa and IIb hyperlipidemia were randomized to 3 drugs (pravastatin 20 mg/d, atorvastatin 10 mg/d, fenofibrate 250 mg/d) for 8 weeks. Plasma glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) analysis were performed on a BM-Hitachi 747-200 autoanalyzer (Hitachi-Roche, Tokyo, Japan). Fibrinogen analysis was performed according to Clauss method. Erythrocyte deformability was assessed with cell transit analysis device. There was no significant difference in body mass index, lipid profile, fibrinogen level, and erythrocyte deformability index values among the groups before treatment ( P > .05). In all groups, there were statistically significant reductions in total LDL-C levels ( P < .05). The triglyceride levels were significantly reduced in the atorvastatin and fenofibrate groups ( P < .05), but not in the pravastatin group ( P > .05). There was no significant change in HDL-C levels during the treatment with statins ( P > .05), but there was a significant increase in the fenofibrate group ( P < .05). Mean erythrocyte deformability index was improved in all the groups ( P < .05). There was no significant change in fibrinogen levels during the treatment of pravastatin and atorvastatin ( P > .05), but in fenofibrate group, fibrinogen levels were significantly decreased ( P < .05). The 3 groups of antihyperlipidemic drugs have beneficial effects on the erythrocyte deformability index. Only fenofibrate has significant beneficial effects on the fibrinogen levels. In a multinational trial (4522IL/0081), we assessed the effects of switching to low doses of rosuvastatin from commonly used doses of atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement in high-risk patients.
                Hypercholesterolemic patients (n = 3140) with coronary heart disease, atherosclerosis, or type 2 diabetes were randomized to open-label rosuvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg, simvastatin 20 mg, or pravastatin 40 mg for 8 weeks. Patients either remained on these treatments for another 8 weeks or switched treatments from atorvastatin 10 mg, simvastatin 20 mg, and pravastatin 40 mg to rosuvastatin 10 mg or from atorvastatin 20 mg to rosuvastatin 10 or 20 mg. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of patients reaching the Joint European Societies' LDL-C goal (<116 mg/dL) at week 16. For measures of cholesterol goal achievement, treatment arms were compared using logistic-regression analysis.
                Significant improvement in LDL-C goal achievement was found for patients who switched to rosuvastatin 10 mg, compared with patients who remained on atorvastatin 10 mg (86% vs 80%, P <.05), simvastatin 20 mg (86% vs 72%, P <.0001), and pravastatin 40 mg (88% vs 66%, P <.0001), and between patients switched to rosuvastatin 20 mg and those who remained on atorvastatin 20 mg (90% vs 84%, P <.01). Similar results were found for achievement of the European combined LDL-C and total cholesterol goals and National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III LDL-C goals. All statins were well tolerated over 16 weeks.
                We demonstrated that switching to a more efficacious statin is an effective strategy to improve lipid goal achievement in patients requiring lipid-lowering therapy. The main effect of statins is the decrease of serum level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, due to the inhibition of intracellular cholesterol biosynthesis which brings about an upregulation of LDL receptors. A minor effect is the decrease of serum triglycerides. The present study was undertaken to verify whether all statins are effective in reducing serum triglycerides and whether their effect on triglycerides is related to the LDL cholesterol lowering activity.
                Of 197 hypercholesterolaemic patients on stable low-fat low-cholesterol diet, 49 were put on atorvastatin 10 mg per day, 48 on fluvastatin 40 mg per day, 50 on pravastatin 20 mg per day and 50 on simvastatin 10 mg per day.
                After 2 months, mean percentage change in serum triglycerides and LDL cholesterol resulted to be significantly different among the four treatment groups, whereas the ratio between the percentage decrease in serum triglycerides and that of LDL cholesterol (Deltatriglyceride/DeltaLDL cholesterol ratio) was not significantly different. Only baseline serum triglycerides resulted to be significantly associated with Deltatriglycerides/DeltaLDL cholesterol ratio. All statins are then effective in decreasing triglyceride levels.
                The lack of a significant difference in Deltatriglycerides/DeltaLDL cholesterol ratio among the treatment groups suggests that the more effective the statin is in decreasing LDL cholesterol, the more it will also be in decreasing serum triglycerides. Uncontrolled studies have shown that statins can improve cerebral vasoreactivity (CVR) in patients with mild small vessel disease. We sought to determine whether high-dose atorvastatin increases CVR compared with placebo in patients with severe small vessel disease.
                Ninety-four adults with recent lacunar stroke were randomly allocated in a double-blind manner to 80 mg of atorvastatin daily or matching placebo after stratification for hypertensive and diabetic status. The primary end point was change in CVR after 3 months of treatment. Secondary outcomes were changes in brachial and carotid artery endothelial-dependent vasodilations.
                At baseline, all patients had a severely impaired CVR (mean, 12.1%; 95% CI, 9.5-14.7) and carotid (mean, -0.25%; 95% CI, -1.17-0.67) and brachial artery (mean, 2.72%; 95% CI, 1.39-4.05) endothelial function. Despite reductions of 55% in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and of 30% in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in the active arm compared to placebo, atorvastatin 80 mg per day did not improve CVR or endothelial dysfunction of carotid and brachial arteries.
                We found no positive effect of 3-month treatment with atorvastatin on severe cerebral microvasculature endothelial dysfunction in patients with lacunar stroke. Delayed chylomicron clearance is a characteristic of patients with coronary artery disease. In vivo study of the clearance of labeled chylomicron-like emulsions constitutes a valid model system for evaluation of chylomicron catabolism. The effects of atorvastatin at low (10 mg) and high (40 mg) dose upon the intravascular metabolism and plasma kinetics of chylomicron-like emulsions were evaluated in fasting hyperlipidemic subjects (n=45). Subjects were randomized to a 6-week treatment period with placebo (n=15), low dose or high dose atorvastatin (10 mg/day, n=17 and 40 mg/day, n=13). The chylomicron-like emulsion, double-labeled with 14C-Cholesteryl oleate (14C-CE) and 3H-triolein (3H-TG), was injected in a bolus after a 12-h fast, and blood samples were collected up to 60 min. Plasma decay curves were determined for labeled emulsion CE and TG and residence times (RT) calculated by the occupancy principle. The 14C-CE RT was decreased by 50% after low dose atorvastatin and by 73% after atorvastatin at high dose in comparison to placebo (P<0.05). The 3H-TG RT was significantly reduced (-55%) after high dose atorvastatin, but in contrast was not significantly reduced after placebo or low dose statin. By compartmental analysis, both doses of atorvastatin led to marked elevation in the slow removal component of emulsion remnant particles (10 mg/day=107%; 40 mg/day=195%, P=0.01). Equally, the rapid removal component was increased (+99%) at high dose (P=0.015). Recirculation of 3H-fatty acids was significantly reduced at both statin doses (43 and 83%, respectively) in comparison to placebo (P=0.01). In conclusion, atorvastatin treatment accelerates the plasma clearance of chylomicron-like emulsions and reduces recirculation of fatty acids in subjects with atherogenic hyperlipidemia. Such effect might implicate in reduction of cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have demonstrated that women at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) benefit from cholesterol lowering to an extent similar to that of men. The ability to achieve established treatment goals for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in women with clearly defined risk factors has not been examined in detail.
                We have determined the efficacy and frequency of achieving target levels for LDL-C with atorvastatin on the basis of National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II recommendations in 318 women according to the presence of CVD (198 women) or risk factors for CVD (120 women) and the presence of mixed dyslipidemia with obesity with or without CVD (72 women). Mean baseline LDL-C concentrations for women with established CVD were in the upper 10% of the distribution for age-matched North American women and, for those without CVD, were also extremely elevated and were in the top 5% of the LDL-C distribution for age-matched women in this population. The majority of participants without CVD (63%) reached LDL-C targets (LDL-C <or=160 mg/dL [4.1 mmol/L] if <2 CHD risk factors and LDL-C <or=130 mg/dL [3.4 mmol/L] if >or=2 CVD risk factors) with 10 mg atorvastatin and 79% reached targets with up to 20 mg of atorvastatin. For women with established CVD, 34% achieved an LDL-C <or=100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) with 10 mg and 60% reached this target with up to 20 mg of atorvastatin. With maximal titration to the LDL-C target, up to and including 80 mg atorvastatin, 87% of women without CVD and 80% of women with established CVD achieved LDL-C targets. The presence of mixed dyslipidemia with obesity did not affect the frequency of achieving LDL-C targets.
                Atorvastatin is very effective in achieving National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II target concentrations for LDL-C in the majority of women with established CVD or CVD risk factors. HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (or statins), a new class of lipid-lowering compounds, have raised expectations for more widespread use than that of the older lipid-lowering drugs. Not only are they more effective in lowering LDL cholesterol, but they are better tolerated as well. No data exist concerning the effect of statins on early carotid atherosclerosis and clinical events in men and women who have moderately elevated LDL cholesterol levels but are free of symptomatic cardiovascular disease.
                Lovastatin (20 to 40 mg/d) or its placebo was evaluated in a double-blind, randomized clinical trial with factorial design along with warfarin (1 mg/d) or its placebo. This report is limited to the lovastatin component of the trial. Daily aspirin (81 mg/d) was recommended for everyone. Enrollment included 919 asymptomatic men and women, 40 to 79 years old, with early carotid atherosclerosis as defined by B-mode ultrasonography and LDL cholesterol between the 60th and 90th percentiles. The 3-year change in mean maximum intimal-medial thickness (IMT) in 12 walls of the carotid arteries was the primary outcome; change in single maximum IMT and incidence of major cardiovascular events were secondary outcomes. LDL cholesterol fell 28%, from 156.6 mg/dL at baseline to 113.1 mg/dL at 6 months (P < .0001), in the lovastatin groups and was largely unchanged in the lovastatin-placebo groups. Among participants not on warfarin, regression of the mean maximum IMT was seen after 12 months in the lovastatin group compared with the placebo group; the 3-year difference was statistically significant (P = .001). A larger favorable effect of lovastatin was observed for the change in single maximum IMT but was not statistically significant (P = .12). Five lovastatin-treated participants suffered major cardiovascular events--coronary heart disease mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke--versus 14 in the lovastatin-placebo groups (P = .04). One lovastatin-treated participant died, compared with eight on lovastatin-placebo (P = .02).
                In men and women with moderately elevated LDL cholesterol, lovastatin reverses progression of IMT in the carotid arteries and appears to reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events and mortality. Results from ongoing large-scale clinical trials may further establish the clinical benefit of statins. The beneficial effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) appear to be attributable not only to their lipid-lowering properties, but also to their therapeutic effects on the coagulation system, and anti-inflammatory effect. Furthermore, statins mitigate the apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) and macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques.
                The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of short-term atorvastatin treatment on the fibrinolytic system and systemic inflammatory status, and on apoptosis in hyperlipidemic patients with CAD.
                The study population consisted of 36 hyperlipidemic patients (14 women and 22 men, mean age 53+/-9 years) with stable CAD, untreated with lipid-lowering medications. Serum lipoproteins, fibrinogen levels, sFas and sL-selectin, and global fibrinolytic capacity (GFC) were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment with atorvastatin, 10 mg/day.
                Atorvastatin treatment decreased serum low-density lipoprotein (-39%, P=0.0001), total cholesterol (-32%, P=0.0001), and triglycerides (-22%, P=0.0001), and increased high-density lipoprotein (+13%, P=0.0001) at 12 weeks compared to baseline. These effects were associated with a decrease in plasma fibrinogen from 331+/-73 to 298+/-58 mg/dl (P=0.0001), and sL-selectin levels from 666+/-201 to 584+/-162 ng/ml (P=0.0001). sFas levels and GFC increased from 3754+/-1264 to 4873+/-1835 pg/ml and from 3.5+/-2.4 to 5.6+/-2.9 microg/ml, respectively (both P=0.0001).
                These results suggest that lipid lowering with atorvastatin therapy significantly increases GFC, decreases fibrinogen levels, and causes leukocyte deactivation. Our findings also suggest that atorvastatin treatment mitigates apoptosis of VSMC in the atherosclerotic plaque. These effects of atorvastatin may, in part, explain the early decrease in cardiovascular events observed in clinical trials of statins. Postprandial lipoprotein metabolism is impaired in hypertriglyceridemia. It is unknown how and to what extent atorvastatin affects postprandial lipoprotein metabolism in hypertriglyceridemic patients. We evaluated the effect of 4 weeks of atorvastatin therapy (10 mg/day) on postprandial lipoprotein metabolism in 10 hypertriglyceridemic patients (age, 40 +/- 3 years; body mass index, 27 +/- 1 kg/m2; cholesterol, 5.74 +/- 0.34 mmol/l; triglycerides, 3.90 +/- 0.66 mmol/l; HDL-cholesterol, 0.85 +/- 0.05 mmol/l; and LDL-cholesterol, 3.18 +/- 0.23 mmol/l). Patients were randomized to be studied with or without atorvastatin therapy. Postprandial lipoprotein metabolism was evaluated with a standardized oral fat load. Plasma was obtained every 2 h for 14 h. Large triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) (containing chylomicrons) and small TRLs (containing chylomicron remnants) were isolated by ultracentrifugation, and cholesterol, triglyceride, apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB-100), apoB-48, apoC-III, and retinyl-palmitate concentrations were determined. Atorvastatin significantly (P < 0.01) decreased fasting cholesterol (-27%), triglycerides (-43%), LDL-cholesterol (-28%), and apoB-100 (-31%), and increased HDL-cholesterol (+19%). Incremental area under the curve (AUC) significantly (P < 0.05) decreased for large TRL-cholesterol, -triglycerides, and -retinyl-palmitate, while none of the small TRL parameters changed. These findings contrast with the results in normolipidemic subjects, in which atorvastatin decreased the AUC for chylomicron remnants (small TRLs) but not for chylomicrons (large TRLs). We conclude that atorvastatin improves postprandial lipoprotein metabolism in addition to decreasing fasting lipid levels in hypertriglyceridemia. Such changes would be expected to improve the atherogenic profile. Endothelial dysfunction represents the earliest stage of atherosclerosis and is usually present in hypercholesterolemia. Treatment with statins has been shown to normalize endothelial function in middle-aged men with hypercholesterolemia. We evaluated the effect over time of atorvastatin on the endothelial reactivity in postmenopausal hypercholesterolemic women (mean age, 58 +/- 6 years), receiving atorvastatin, 10 mg daily (n = 20) or American Heart Association step 1 diet (n = 10) for 8 weeks. Lipid profile and brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation (FMV) were determined at baseline and after 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks. FMV increased progressively in subjects treated with atorvastatin, and the difference was significant (p < 0.05 vs. baseline) after the second week (baseline 3.8 +/- 3%; first week, 4.8 +/- 3%; second week, 9.2 +/- 3%; fourth week, 11.0 +/- 3%; eighth week, 11.7 +/- 3%). No significant changes were observed in subjects receiving diet (baseline, 3.1 +/- 4%; first week, 2.4 +/- 2%; second week, 2.9 +/- 2%; fourth week, 3.1 +/- 2%; eighth week, 3.3 +/- 2%; p = NS). In the atorvastatin group, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol showed a significant decrease since the first week (baseline, 228 +/- 37 mg/dl; first week, 171 +/- 32; second week, 147 +/- 27; fourth week, 139 +/- 29; eighth week, 135 +/- 27; all p < 0.05). In the control group, LDL cholesterol showed a smaller but significant (p < 0.05) reduction after the second week (baseline, 226 +/- 17 mg/dl; first week, 225 +/- 16; second week, 220 +/- 17; fourth week, 203 +/- 27; eighth week, 198 +/- 27). In conclusion, hypercholesterolemic women treated with atorvastatin show a significant improvement in endothelial reactivity after as early as 2 weeks of therapy. The extent to which these beneficial effects are attributable to cholesterol reduction or to a direct effect of the drug remains to be established.
Blood total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride lowering effect of atorvastatin was dependent on dose. Log dose-response data was linear over the commonly prescribed dose range. Manufacturer-recommended atorvastatin doses of 10 to 80 mg/day resulted in 36% to 53% decreases of LDL-cholesterol. The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with atorvastatin because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in 37% of the placebo-controlled trials.