A comparison of surgical and conservative treatment in ankle ligament tears. Conservative versus surgical treatment for repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament in acute dislocations of the patella. Isolated repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament in primary dislocation of the patella: a prospective randomized study. Randomized controlled study of ultrasound therapy in the management of acute lateral ligament sprains of the ankle joint. Operative and functional treatment of rupture of the lateral ligament of the ankle. A randomised, prospective trial. Operative versus non-operative treatment of recent injuries to the ligaments of the knee. A prospective randomized study. [Therapy of fresh fibular ligament ruptures]. A randomized, prospective study of operative and non-operative treatment of injuries of the fibular collateral ligaments of the ankle. A prospective study of the treatment of severe tears of the lateral ligament of the ankle. Rupture of the lateral ligaments of the ankle: a controlled clinical trial. Comparison between single-and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. Augmented compared with nonaugmented surgical repair of a fresh total Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study. Postoperative treatment of internally fixed ankle fractures: a prospective randomised study.
Good results have been reported after both primary repair and conservative management of grade III ankle sprains. This prospective study found no advantage of operative treatment compared to taping; no significant differences were found between the groups with regard to objective or subjective stability, functional scores, or the overall result. The objective of this study was to analyze and compare the results obtained after 2 types of treatment, surgical and conservative, for acute patellar dislocations.
                We divided 33 patients with acute patellar dislocations into 2 groups. One group with 16 patients underwent conservative treatment (immobilization and subsequent physiotherapy), and the other group with 17 patients underwent surgical treatment. A radiographic examination was performed in the evaluation of the patients to verify predisposing factors for patellofemoral instability, and the Kujala questionnaire was applied with the intention of analyzing the improvement of pain and quality of life. The chi(2) test, t test, and Fisher test were used in the statistical evaluation. A significance level of P < .05 was adopted.
                The groups were considered parametric in relation to age and sex. The conservative treatment group exhibited a higher number of recurrent dislocations (8 patients) than the surgical treatment group, which did not have any relapses. In addition, the surgical treatment group obtained a better mean score on the Kujala test (92) than the conservative treatment group (69).
                We conclude that surgical treatment afforded better results. There were no recurrences in the surgical treatment group, but there were 8 recurrences in the conservative treatment group. The mean Kujala score was 92 in the surgical treatment group and 69 in the conservative treatment group.
                Level II, lesser-quality therapeutic randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of surgical reinsertion of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) to the adductor tubercle compared with conservative treatment in patients with primary dislocation of the patella.
                Eighty patients with primary patella dislocation were included in the study. Delayed arthroscopy (mean, 50 days after injury) was performed to assess cartilage injury and status. During arthroscopy, patients were randomized to surgical reinsertion of the MPFL or to conservative treatment. Conservative treatment was use of a brace with 0 degrees to 20 degrees motion for the first 2 weeks after dislocation. Patients were followed up for 2 years. The incidence of recurrent patella dislocation was recorded along with the clinical Kujala scores and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores.
                The redislocation rates were 17% and 20% in the operative and conservative treatment groups, respectively (P = not significant). Kujala scores were 85 and 78 in the operative and conservative treatment groups, respectively (P = .07). The patella stability subscore was significantly higher in the operative group. No difference in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores was found.
                Delayed primary repair of the MPFL by use of an anchor-based reattachment to the adductor tubercle without vastus medialis obliquus repair after primary patella dislocation does not reduce the risk of redislocation nor does it produce any significantly better subjective functional outcome based on the Kujala knee score. Only the specific subjective patella stability score was improved by MPFL repair compared with conservative treatment.
                Level I, therapeutic randomized controlled trial. To determine the efficacy of a fixed dose of ultrasound energy to treat acute lateral ligament sprains of the ankle joint.
                Double-blind randomised controlled trial.
                Accident and Emergency department of University Teaching Hospital.
                Patients presenting at Accident and Emergency with ankle injuries.
                Ultrasound or placebo, and Tubigrip.
                Pain measured with visual analogue scales, swelling using a tape measure, range of movement using a fluid-filled goniometer, and weight bearing using two scales simultaneously.
                Patients in both groups improved symptomatically. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in any outcome measure. Within groups, statistically significant differences were detected in pain perceived, and range of movement (dorsiflexion).
                At the dose and duration used, ultrasound therapy is no better than placebo in the management of lateral ligament injuries. Consecutive patients with a confirmed rupture of at least one of the lateral ligaments of the ankle were randomly assigned to receive either operative or functional treatment. They were evaluated at a median of 8 years (6 to 11). In total, 370 patients were included. Follow-up was available for 317 (86%). Fewer patients allocated to operative treatment reported residual pain compared with those who had been allocated to functional treatment (16% versus 25%, RR 0.64, CI 041 to 1.0). Fewer surgically-treated patients reported symptoms of giving way (20% versus 32%, RR 0.62, CI 0.42 to 0.92) and recurrent sprains (22% versus 34%, RR 0.66, CI 0.45 to 0.94). The anterior drawer test was less frequently positive in surgically-treated patients (30% versus 54%, RR 0.54, CI 0.41 to 0.72). The median Povacz score was significantly higher in the operative group (26 versus 22, p < 0.001). Compared with functional treatment, operative treatment gives a better long-term outcome in terms of residual pain, recurrent sprains and stability. Two hundred consecutively seen patients who had an injury to either the anterior cruciate ligament or the medial collateral ligament, or both, were randomly allocated to treatment by either conservative or a surgical regimen. Injuries to the medial collateral ligament could not be demonstrated to benefit from surgical treatment in any respect--with or without surgery the results were excellent. With injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament, recovery was more rapid without surgery but otherwise the results differed between the groups in only one respect: the pivot-shift test was more often positive after conservative treatment. The results were good in both treatment groups even though most of the patients who had an injury of the anterior cruciate ligament were somewhat less pleased with the outcome after a period of time. In a prospective, random study carried out at the Casualty Clinic of the University Hospital of Hannover from 15 April 1986 to 31 July 1986, 200 patients were randomly selected from four treatment groups, according to treatment: operative-immobilized (group A, n = 52), operative-functional (group B, n = 50), conservative-immobilized (group C, n = 48) and conservative-functional (group D, n = 50). Follow-up examinations were made in 92.5% of patients after 3 months and 64% after 12 months. At the 3-month and 1-year follow-ups, no statistically significant differences were found in the total evaluation (100-point checklist) Moderately significant instability (6 degrees -10 degrees talar tilt and 6-10 mm anterior talar dislocation) in the conservative groups C and D was observed only in the clinical-radiological instability test. This statistically significant difference is, however, only evident in stress tenographically confirmed dual-ligament lesions. No functional physiological differences can be found after 12 months; on average, the period of incapacitation is 3 weeks shorter than with primary functional treatment, but so far there are no long-term results. Until late results are available, we conclude that conservative treatment, even for professional athletes, can be recommended as the procedure most free of risk and most economical; if at all, operative therapy should only be carried out when the instability is very serious. One hundred and forty-six adults who had an isolated injury of the fibular collateral ligaments of the ankle were randomized to be managed operatively or non-operatively. Disruption of the ligaments was diagnosed by means of a physical examination and on the basis of stress radiographs of the ankle made with use of a specially designed device to hold the leg. Operative treatment, performed in seventy-three patients, consisted of suture repair of the disrupted ligaments within seventy-two hours after the injury, followed by immobilization of the ankle in a below-the-knee plaster cast for six weeks. Non-operative treatment, used for seventy-three patients, consisted of the use of an ankle orthosis for six weeks. After a minimum of two years of follow-up, we could detect no significant differences, with the numbers available, between the two groups with regard to the functional result or the degree of joint laxity that was evident on stress radiographs. The non-operative group lost a mean of 1.6 weeks from work, and the operative group lost a mean of 7.0 weeks. We concluded that non-operative treatment of an injury of the fibular collateral ligaments of the ankle yields results that are comparable with those of operative repair and is associated with a shorter period of recovery. A prospective randomized clinical study was undertaken to compare bandaging, plaster cast immobilisation and operative treatment for recent tears of the lateral ligament of the ankle. The follow-up period was two years. Subjectively, only the fear of giving-way showed a clear difference in favour of operative repair. Objective evaluation, including stress radiographs, demonstrated no statistical differences between the three methods of treatment. Although bandaging appeared somewhat less satisfactory with respect to the resulting stability of the ankle, the differences were not statistically significant. The lateral ligament in patients over 40 years of age showed a statistically significant tendency to heal less well than that of younger patients. Severe ankle sprains in patients under 40 years of age should preferably be treated by operation, especially in younger patients and if the person is physically active. Lateral ligament tears in patients over 40 years of age should be treated conservatively and a secondary reconstruction carried out later, if necessary. The results of a randomized study comparing three different principles of treatment for rupture of the lateral ligaments of the ankle are presented. A total of 95 patients was treated and followed up for 17 months. In this series, 32 patients were treated with primary suture and plaster-of-Paris, 33 patients with plaster-of-Paris only and 30 patients with strapping. In all, 31 patients (97%) were completely free of symptoms in the operation group, 22 (67%) in the plaster-of-Paris group and 23 (77%) in the strapping group. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction popularity is increasing with the aim to reproduce native ACL anatomy and improve ACL reconstruction outcome. However, to date, only a few randomized clinical studies have been published.
                The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the clinical results of single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction.
                Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1.
                Seventy patients with a chronic unilateral ACL rupture who underwent arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction using a hamstring graft were randomized to receive a single- (SB) or double-bundle (DB) reconstruction. Both groups were comparable with regard to preoperative data. A double-incision surgical technique was adopted in both groups. The graft was fixed by looping the hamstring tendons around a bony (DB) or a metallic (SB) bridge on the tibial side and with interference screws reinforced with a staple on the femur. The same rehabilitation protocol was adopted. Outcome assessment was performed by a blinded, independent observer using the visual analog scale (VAS) score, the new International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and KT-1000 arthrometer evaluation.
                All the patients reached a minimum follow-up of 2 years. No differences between the 2 groups were observed in terms of KOOS and IKDC subjective score. A statistically significant difference in favor of the DB group was found with the VAS (P < .03). The objective IKDC final scores showed statistically significantly more "normal knees" in the DB group than in the SB group (P = .03). There was 1 stability failure in the DB group and 3 in the SB group. The KT-1000 arthrometer data showed a statistically significant decrease in the average anterior tibial translation in the DB group (1.2 mm DB vs 2.1 mm SB; P < .03). The incidence of a residual pivot-shift glide was 14% in DB and 26% in SB (P = .08).
                In the 2-year minimum follow-up, DB ACL reconstructions showed better VAS, anterior knee laxity, and final objective IKDC scores than SB. However, longer follow-up and accurate instrumented in vivo rotational stability assessment are needed. Augmented and nonaugmented techniques have been used for the operative repair of a fresh complete Achilles tendon rupture. Augmented techniques have been favored for their stronger pullout strengths but have been avoided because of the risk of wound complications. If proven to be equally good, the nonaugmented technique would be the method of choice. In the present study, we hypothesized that augmentation with a down-turned gastrocnemius fascia flap would not provide better results than would end-to-end suture repair with use of the Krackow locking loop surgical technique.
                Sixty patients with an acute Achilles tendon rupture were randomized preoperatively to receive end-to-end suture repair with use of the Krackow locking loop technique either without augmentation (simple repair group) or with a down-turned gastrocnemius fascia flap as described by Silfverskiöld (augmented repair group). A brace allowed free active plantar flexion of the ankle postoperatively, whereas dorsiflexion was restricted to neutral for the first three weeks. Weight-bearing was limited for six weeks. The follow-up period was one year, and the patients were evaluated in terms of clinical measurements, an outcome score, isokinetic calf muscle performance tests, and tendon elongation measurements.
                The mean operative time was twenty-five minutes longer and the incision was 7 cm longer in the augmented repair group as compared with the simple repair group (p < 0.001 for both). In the simple repair group, the overall ankle score was excellent for nineteen patients (63%) and good for eight patients (27%) and three patients (10%) had an early failure (all because of rerupture). In the augmented repair group, the ankle score was excellent for fourteen patients (56%) and good for six patients (24%) and five patients (20%) had a failure because of rerupture (three) or deep infection (two). The difference between the groups with regard to the overall result was not significant (p = 0.68). In the simple repair group the isokinetic calf muscle strength score was excellent for eleven patients (37%), good for fourteen patients (47%), and fair for two patients (7%), with three patients (10%) having a failure, whereas in the augmented repair group the score was excellent for nine patients (36%), good for seven patients (28%), fair for three patients (12%), and poor for one patient (4%), with five patients (20%) having an early failure. Achilles tendon elongation occurred in both groups, and elongation correlated significantly with isokinetic peak torque deficits (rho = 0.64, p = 0.001) and isometric strength deficits (rho = 0.48, p = 0.026) in the simple repair group. No significant differences were seen between the two groups at the three-month and twelve-month checkups with regard to pain, stiffness, subjective calf muscle weakness, footwear restrictions, range of ankle motion, overall outcome, isokinetic calf muscle strength, mean peak work-displacement relationships, or tendon elongation.
                Augmented repair of a fresh total Achilles tendon rupture does not have any advantage over simple end-to-end repair. In a prospective, randomised trial of 81 patients with fractures of the ankle of AO types A, B and C we compared two regimes of postoperative management after internal fixation. The patients were mobilised either non-weight-bearing with crutches or weight-bearing in a below-knee walking plaster. We found a temporary benefit in subjective evaluation only (65 v 50 points, Mann-Whitney test, cft, p=0.02) for those with a below-knee walking plaster. There were no significant differences between the groups in the loaded dorsal range of movement (25 degrees v 23 degrees, Mann-Whitney test, cft, p = 0.16) or in the overall clinical result. Both treatments were considered to be satisfactory and their choice depends on the ability to mobilise non-weight-bearing, wound healing, the type of work and personal preference.
There is insufficient evidence available from randomised controlled trials to determine the relative effectiveness of surgical and conservative treatment for acute injuries of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle. High quality randomised controlled trials of primary surgical repair versus the best available conservative treatment for well-defined injuries are required.