Tolerability of 5 mg solifenacin once daily versus 5 mg oxybutynin immediate release 3 times daily: results of the VECTOR trial. Dry mouth with conventional and controlled-release oxybutynin in urinary incontinence. The Ditropan XL Study Group. A randomized controlled trial of tolterodine and oxybutynin on tolerability and clinical efficacy for treating Chinese women with an overactive bladder. Prospective, randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy and tolerability of the extended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine for overactive bladder: results of the OPERA trial. Efficacy and safety of solifenacin succinate in Korean patients with overactive bladder: a randomised, prospective, double-blind, multicentre study. A double-blind randomized dose-response study comparing daily doses of 5, 10 and 15 mg controlled-release oxybutynin: balancing efficacy with severity of dry mouth. Tolterodine, a new antimuscarinic agent: as effective but better tolerated than oxybutynin in patients with an overactive bladder. Solifenacin appears effective and well tolerated in patients with symptomatic idiopathic detrusor overactivity in a placebo- and tolterodine-controlled phase 2 dose-finding study. Comparative efficacy and safety of transdermal oxybutynin and oral tolterodine versus placebo in previously treated patients with urge and mixed urinary incontinence. Treatment of overactive bladder with once-daily extended-release tolterodine or oxybutynin: the antimuscarinic clinical effectiveness trial (ACET). Clinical efficacy and safety of tolterodine compared to oxybutynin and placebo in patients with overactive bladder. Tolterodine: superior tolerability than and comparable efficacy to oxybutynin in individuals 50 years old or older with overactive bladder: a randomized controlled trial. Tolterodine once-daily: superior efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of the overactive bladder. Clinical efficacy and tolerability of extended-release tolterodine and immediate-release oxybutynin in Japanese and Korean patients with an overactive bladder: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Randomized, double-blind placebo- and tolterodine-controlled trial of the once-daily antimuscarinic agent solifenacin in patients with symptomatic overactive bladder. Tolterodine: as effective but better tolerated than oxybutynin in Asian patients with symptoms of overactive bladder. A placebo-controlled, multicentre study comparing the tolerability and efficacy of propiverine and oxybutynin in patients with urgency and urge incontinence. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of controlled- and immediate-release oxybutynin chloride in urge urinary incontinence. Solifenacin and tolterodine are equally effective in the treatment of overactive bladder symptoms. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of solifenacin succinate and extended release tolterodine at treating overactive bladder syndrome: results of the STAR trial. Superior efficacy of fesoterodine over tolterodine extended release with rapid onset: a prospective, head-to-head, placebo-controlled trial. A short-term, multicenter, randomized double-blind dose titration study of the efficacy and anticholinergic side effects of transdermal compared to immediate release oral oxybutynin treatment of patients with urge urinary incontinence. Efficacy and safety of tolterodine in patients with detrusor instability: a dose-ranging study. Efficacy and safety of two doses of tolterodine versus placebo in patients with detrusor overactivity and symptoms of frequency, urge incontinence, and urgency: urodynamic evaluation. The International Study Group. Controlled, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial to investigate long-term tolerability and efficacy of trospium chloride in patients with detrusor instability. Ocular side-effects of tolterodine and oxybutynin, a single-blind prospective randomized trial. Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine extended release for the treatment of overactive bladder: a head-to-head placebo-controlled trial. Reduced perception of urgency in treatment of overactive bladder with extended-release tolterodine. Comparison of darifenacin and oxybutynin in patients with overactive bladder: assessment of ambulatory urodynamics and impact on salivary flow. Once daily controlled versus immediate release oxybutynin chloride for urge urinary incontinence. OROS Oxybutynin Study Group. Tolterodine: a safe and effective treatment for older patients with overactive bladder. Comparison of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of propiverine and oxybutynin for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of extended-release once-daily tolterodine treatment for overactive bladder in older versus younger patients. Simplified bladder training augments the effectiveness of tolterodine in patients with an overactive bladder. Propiverine compared to oxybutynin in neurogenic detrusor overactivity--results of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical study. Health-related quality of life of Japanese patients with overactive bladder treated with extended-release tolterodine or immediate-release oxybutynin: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Tolterodine reduces the number of urge incontinence episodes in patients with an overactive bladder. Propiverine versus tolterodine: efficacy and tolerability in patients with overactive bladder. Intravesical oxybutynin: mode of action assessed by passive diffusion and electromotive administration with pharmacokinetics of oxybutynin and N-desethyl oxybutynin. Efficacy of simplified bladder training in patients with overactive bladder receiving a solifenacin flexible-dose regimen: results from a randomized study. A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of controlled-release oxybutynin tablets (10 mg once daily) with conventional oxybutynin tablets (5 mg twice daily) in patients whose symptoms were stabilized on 5 mg twice daily of oxybutynin. Comparison of a 10-mg controlled release oxybutynin tablet with a 5-mg oxybutynin tablet in urge incontinent patients. Dose-ranging study of tolterodine in patients with detrusor hyperreflexia. Long-term prospective randomized study comparing two different regimens of oxybutynin as a treatment for detrusor overactivity. Clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-daily fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder. The cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine for the local treatment of dry mouth: a randomized study. Trospium chloride and oxybutynin hydrochloride in a german study of adults with urinary urge incontinence: results of a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, flexible-dose noninferiority trial. Comparison of the efficacy of tolterodine and oxybutynin in different urodynamic severity grades of idiopathic detrusor overactivity. Efficacy and tolerability of darifenacin, a muscarinic M3 selective receptor antagonist (M3 SRA), compared with oxybutynin in the treatment of patients with overactive bladder. Clinical efficacy and safety of tolterodine compared to placebo in detrusor overactivity. Addition of anticholinergic solution prolongs bronchodilator effect of beta 2 agonists in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. [Assessment of effectiveness of and tolerance to oxybutynin in the treatment of unstable bladder in women]. Intravesical electromotive administration of oxybutynin in patients with detrusor hyperreflexia unresponsive to standard anticholinergic regimens. Trospium chloride versus oxybutynin: a randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial in the treatment of detrusor hyper-reflexia. Management of xerostomia in older patients : a randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a new oral lubricant solution. High-dose inhaled budesonide may substitute for oral therapy after an acute asthma attack. Long-term, double-blind comparison of controlled-release albuterol versus sustained-release theophylline in adolescents and adults with asthma. Daily or intermittent budesonide in preschool children with recurrent wheezing. A long-term evaluation of once-daily inhaled tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Rapid induction of clinical response with a short-term high-dose starting schedule of budesonide nebulizing suspension in young children with recurrent wheezing episodes. Randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trial of the once daily antimuscarinic agent solifenacin succinate in patients with overactive bladder. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a combination of ipratropium and albuterol is more effective than either agent alone. An 85-day multicenter trial. COMBIVENT Inhalation Aerosol Study Group. Efficacy of a new oral lubricant solution in the management of psychotropic drug-induced xerostomia: a randomized controlled trial. [Puerperal inhibition of lactation with metergoline or bromocriptine].
Although antimuscarinic treatment is indicated for overactive bladder, many patients discontinue it because of dry mouth. Of available antimuscarinics oxybutynin is associated with the highest dry mouth rate. We compared the safety and tolerability of 5 mg solifenacin vs 15 mg oxybutynin immediate release.
                At 12 Canadian centers a total of 132 patients with overactive bladder symptoms (greater than 1 urgency episode per 24 hours, and 8 or greater micturitions per 24 hours) were randomized to 5 mg solifenacin once daily or 5 mg oxybutynin 3 times daily for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the incidence and severity of dry mouth reported after direct questioning. Efficacy end points (3-day diary documented changes in urgency, frequency, incontinence, nocturia and voided volume), and changes on the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition scale and the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire were evaluated secondarily.
                Of patients on solifenacin vs oxybutynin immediate release 35% vs 83% reported dry mouth (p <0.0001). Of patients reporting dry mouth severity was graded moderate by 13% and 42% of those on solifenacin and oxybutynin immediate release, and severe by 13% and 28%, respectively (p = 0.001). Patients in each group showed improvements in efficacy end points, and Patient Perception of Bladder Condition scale and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire scores from baseline to treatment end.
                Significantly fewer patients on 5 mg solifenacin once daily reported dry mouth vs those receiving 5 mg oxybutynin immediate release 3 times daily. Significantly fewer patients on solifenacin reported moderate/severe dry mouth. Significantly fewer patients on solifenacin withdrew from study due to dry mouth and there were significantly fewer overall adverse events. Solifenacin and oxybutynin immediate release were efficacious in decreasing efficacy end points, and improved Patient Perception of Bladder Condition scale and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire results from baseline to treatment end.
                2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. To compare the efficacy and safety of controlled-release oxybutynin with conventional, immediate-release oxybutynin and determine rates of dry mouth.
                Patients (n = 226) who were known to be responsive to anticholinergic therapy and who had seven or more urge incontinence episodes per week were randomized to receive controlled-release oxybutynin or immediate-release oxybutynin. After an initial placebo run-in period, dosing in each began at 5 mg per day and increased weekly by 5 mg per day to a maximum of 20 mg per day or when a balance between improvement of incontinence symptoms and tolerability of side effects was achieved. Rates of urge incontinence and dry mouth were compared. Post hoc Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to describe elimination of incontinence episodes by dose and to analyze dry mouth risk by dose.
                Reductions in urge urinary incontinence episodes from baseline to the end of treatment were 18.6 to 2.9 per week (83% mean decrease) and 19.8 to 4.4 per week (76% mean decrease) in the controlled- and immediate-release oxybutynin groups (P =.36), respectively. At equal doses, comparable proportions of patients in both groups reported the absence of urge incontinence (P =.85). The incidence of dry mouth increased with dose in both groups, but there was no difference in dry mouth rates between the groups: 47.7% and 59.1% for the controlled- and immediate-release oxybutynin (P =.09), respectively. However, Kaplan-Meier analysis to examine first report of dry mouth at a given dose revealed that a significantly lower proportion of patients taking controlled-release oxybutynin had moderate to severe dry mouth (P =.007) or any dry mouth (P =.003) compared with those taking immediate-release oxybutynin.
                At the same daily dose, controlled- and immediate-release oxybutynin demonstrated comparable efficacy in reduction of urge incontinence episodes. The incidence of dry mouth was dose dependent but equal in both groups; first report of moderate to severe dry mouth was significantly lower in the controlled-release group. Objective To compare the tolerability and clinical efficacy of tolterodine and oxybutynin in the treatment of Hong Kong Chinese women with an overactive bladder. Patients and methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted at two urogynaecology centres in Hong Kong. In all, 106 women with urodynamically confirmed detrusor instability were recruited. Baseline severity assessments included a visual analogue scale (VAS), urinary diary and urinary pad-test. The women were randomized to receive either oral tolterodine 2 mg or oxybutynin 5 mg twice daily for 10 weeks. Treatment responses were assessed at 4 and 10 weeks using the VAS and urinary diary. Treatment tolerability was assessed at baseline, 4 and 10 weeks using the Xerostomia Questionnaire. A urinary pad-test was repeated at 10 weeks. Results The perceived change from baseline VAS was better in the tolterodine than the oxybutynin group after 10 weeks of treatment (per-protocol analysis, P = 0.043). The two drugs were effective in reducing the symptoms of frequency (P < 0.001). Tolterodine was significantly better than oxybutynin in reducing urinary leakage (urinary pad-test; median change - 5.00 g vs 0 g, P = 0.019). Both drugs caused a significant worsening of dry mouth (overall dryness, P < 0.005; discomfort, P < 0.005; sleep, P = 0.021; speaking, P = 0.045; swallowing, P = 0.004; and liquid consumption, P = 0.017). Conclusions Both oxybutynin and tolterodine were effective in ameliorating the severity of the symptoms of detrusor instability. Tolterodine was better than oxybutynin in both subjective and objective outcome measures, but both drugs caused similar worsening of dry mouth that may limit the tolerability of these medications. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release formulations of oxybutynin chloride and tolterodine tartrate in women with overactive bladder.
                The OPERA (Overactive bladder: Performance of Extended Release Agents) trial was a randomized, double-blind, active-control study performed at 71 US study centers from November 21, 2000, to October 18,2001. Extended-release formulations of oxybutynin at 10 mg/d or tolterodine at 4 mg/d were given for 12 weeks to women with 21 to 60 urge urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes per week and an average of 10 or more voids per 24 hours. Episodes of UUI (primary end point), total (urge and nonurge) incontinence, and micturition were recorded in 24-hour urinary diaries at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 and compared. Adverse events were also evaluated.
                Improvements in weekly UUI episodes were similar for the 790 women who received extended-release formulations of oxybutynin (n = 391) or tolterodine (n = 399). Oxybutynin was significantly more effective than tolterodine in reducing micturition frequency (P = .003), and 23.0% of women taking oxybutynin reported no episodes of urinary incontinence compared with 16.8% of women taking tolterodine (P = .03). Dry mouth, usually mild, was more common with oxybutynin (P = .02). Adverse events were generally mild and occurred at low rates, with both groups having similar discontinuation of treatment due to adverse events.
                Reductions in weekly UUI and total incontinence episodes were similar with extended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine. In the oxybutynin group, micturition frequency was significantly lower, and the percentage of women reporting no urinary incontinence episodes was significantly higher compared with the tolterodine group. Dry mouth was more common with oxybutynin, but tolerability was otherwise comparable, including adverse events involving the central nervous system. We assessed the efficacy and safety of solifenacin compared with tolterodine for treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in Korean patients.
                The study was randomised, double-blind, tolterodine-controlled trial in Korea. Patients had average frequency of >or= 8 voids per 24 h and episodes of urgency or urgency incontinence >or= 3 during 3-day voiding diary period. Patients were randomised to 12-week double-blind treatment with either tolterodine immediate release (IR) 2 mg twice daily (TOL4) or solifenacin 5 mg (SOL5) or 10 mg (SOL10) once daily. The outcome measure was mean change in daily micturition frequency, volume, daily frequency of urgency incontinence, urgency and nocturia from baseline to week 12. Quality of life was assessed using the King's Health Questionnaire.
                A total of 357 were randomised and 329 were evaluated for efficacy. All voiding parameters recorded in micturition diary improved after treatment in all three groups. Mean changes in volume voided were 19.30 ml (26.69%) in TOL4, 30.37 ml (25.89%) in SOL5 and 37.12 ml (33.36%) in SOL10 group (p = 0.03). Speed of onset of SOL10 efficacy on urgency incontinence was faster than that of SOL5 and TOL4. Quality of life improved in all three groups. Dry mouth was the most common adverse event; its incidence was the lowest in SOL5 group (7.63%, compared with 19.49% and 18.64% in SOL10 and TOL4 groups respectively).
                Solifenacin succinate 5 and 10 mg once daily improve OAB symptoms with acceptable tolerability levels compared with tolterodine IR 4 mg. Solifenacin 5 mg is a recommended starting dose in Korean patients with OAB. To assess the efficacy, incidence of dry mouth and overall satisfaction with initial doses of 5, 10 and 15 mg of a new, once-daily, controlled-release (CR) form of oxybutynin for treating urge urinary incontinence (UUI).
                Patients who reported urinary incontinence (UI) (one or more episodes/diary) and voiding frequency (eight or more voids/day) or urgency (one or more episodes/diary) during a 2-week baseline were randomized to once-daily 5, 10 or 15 mg CR oxybutynin for 4 weeks. Daily episodes of UI, voids, urgency, adverse events, dry mouth and satisfaction were recorded in a 3-day diary at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. In all, 237 patients were randomized and evaluated.
                Episodes of UI, voids and urgency were significantly reduced over the study period at all doses. Daily UI episodes were significantly lower with 15 mg/day than 5 and 10 mg/day. Dry mouth symptoms were similar in the 10 and 15 mg/day groups, and higher than in the 5 mg/day group. However, significantly greater overall satisfaction was reported with 15 than 5 mg/day.
                There were significant dose-response relationships with CR oxybutynin for both UI episodes and dry mouth. The greatest satisfaction was with 15 mg/day, and the severity of dry mouth was comparable at 10 mg/day, indicating that greater efficacy at the higher dose did not compromise tolerability. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine with that of oxybutynin in patients with an overactive bladder.
                A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multinational phase-III study was conducted in urology and gynaecology clinics in the UK, Republic of Ireland and Sweden. The study enrolled 293 patients with urodynamically confirmed bladder overactivity, increased frequency of micturition (> or = micturitions/24 h) and symptoms of urgency and/or urge incontinence (> or = 1 episode/24 h). Patients received either tolterodine (2 mg twice daily) or oxybutynin (5 mg three times daily) or placebo. Doses could be reduced, to prevent withdrawal, to 1 mg or 2.5 mg, respectively. The main outcome measures were the mean change from baseline in frequency of micturition/24 h, the number of incontinent episodes/24 h and volume voided per micturition.
                After 12 weeks' treatment, the mean frequency of micturition decreased by 21% and 19.5% in those receiving tolterodine (n = 118) and oxybutynin (n = 118), respectively, and by 10.5% in those on placebo (n = 57). Among those with urge incontinence at baseline (75% of patients), the mean number of incontinent episodes decreased by 47%, 71% and 19%, respectively, in those receiving tolterodine, oxybutynin and placebo. The effect of tolterodine and oxybutynin on these two micturition variables was statistically equivalent. There was also a comparable increase in mean volume voided per micturition in the tolterodine (27%) and oxybutynin groups (31%), compared with 7% in the placebo group. Dry mouth was the most common adverse event and was reported with greater frequency and intensity among patients receiving oxybutynin than among those receiving either tolterodine or placebo. In the oxybutynin group, more patients also withdrew because of adverse events and a greater proportion required dose reduction as a result of adverse events. Despite dose reduction, the frequency of adverse events and the intensity of dry mouth remained higher among those receiving oxybutynin (2.5 mg three times daily) than in patients who remained on tolterodine 2 mg twice daily.
                Tolterodine 2 mg twice daily is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of bladder overactivity. Tolterodine was better tolerated than oxybutynin, particularly with respect to the frequency and intensity of dry mouth, but had comparable clinical efficacy. The superior tolerability of tolterodine therefore allows more patients to remain on effective therapy than the current most commonly prescribed agent for the treatment of the overactive bladder. To evaluate the dose-response relationship and safety/tolerability of solifenacin succinate (YM905) in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), and to compare its efficacy and safety/tolerability with tolterodine 2 mg twice daily.
                This multicentre study included a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in, a 4-week double-blind placebo-controlled active treatment phase, and a 2-week follow-up. Men and women with an OAB and urodynamic evidence of detrusor overactivity were randomized to placebo or solifenacin 2.5, 5, 10 or 20 mg once daily, or tolterodine 2 mg twice daily.
                Of 265 patients enrolled, 225 were randomized and 192 completed the study. Solifenacin 5, 10 and 20 mg produced statistically significant (P < 0.05) improvements in voids/24 h vs placebo, whereas tolterodine did not; the mean change with tolterodine was between those with solifenacin 2.5 and 5 mg. The outcome was similar for the mean change from baseline to endpoint in mean volume voided/void. For incontinence and urgency episodes/24 h the solifenacin dose groups showed numerically superior changes vs placebo; the mean effects with tolterodine were generally smaller than with solifenacin. Most of the efficacy effect of solifenacin was evident at 2 weeks. Quality-of-life outcomes supported the efficacy results. Solifenacin 5 and 10 mg were well tolerated; there were no serious treatment-related adverse events. The incidence of dry mouth was 14% for solifenacin 5 and 10 mg, 2.6% for placebo and 24% for tolterodine.
                In this study, the 5- and 10-mg doses of solifenacin appeared to be the most clinically effective for treating OAB, considering the balance between efficacy, quality of life and tolerability. From the results of this study solifenacin 5 and 10 mg were selected for further evaluation in large-scale phase 3 studies. To compare the efficacy and safety of an oxybutynin transdermal delivery system (OXY-TDS) and oral, long-acting tolterodine (TOL-LA) with placebo in previously treated patients with urge or mixed urinary incontinence.
                After withdrawal of their current antimuscarinic therapy, 361 adult patients were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind, double-dummy treatment with twice weekly OXY-TDS 3.9 mg/day, daily TOL-LA 4 mg, or placebo. Evaluations included change from baseline in patient urinary diary symptoms, incontinence-specific quality of life, and safety.
                OXY-TDS 3.9 mg/day and TOL-LA 4 mg/day significantly reduced the number of daily incontinence episodes (median change -3 OXY-TDS and -3 TOL-LA versus -2 placebo; P <0.05), increased the average void volume (median change 24 and 29 mL versus 5.5 mL, P <0.01), and improved quality of life (incontinence impact questionnaire [IIQ] total score, P <0.05; Urogenital Distress Inventory Irritative Symptom subscale, P <0.05) compared with placebo. The most common adverse event for OXY-TDS was localized application site pruritus (14% versus 4% placebo) accompanied by a low incidence of systemic side effects (eg, dry mouth 4.1%). Anticholinergic adverse events occurred with greatest frequency during TOL-LA treatment (dry mouth 7.3% versus 1.7% placebo, P <0.05).
                OXY-TDS and TOL-LA are effective and comparable treatments for patients with urge and mixed incontinence. OXY-TDS improves systemic safety with regard to anticholinergic side effects. Local skin irritation occurs in some OXY-TDS patients. Treatment with the antimuscarinic agents tolterodine and oxybutynin is the mainstay of therapy for overactive bladder, a chronic and debilitating condition characterized by urinary urgency with or without urge incontinence, usually in combination with urinary frequency and nocturia. This study consisted of two trials; in one, patients with overactive bladder were randomized to 8 weeks of open-label treatment with either 2 mg or 4 mg of once-daily extended-release tolterodine (TER), and in the other to 5 mg or 10 mg of extended-release oxybutynin (OER). The study protocol and design were identical for the two trials and site selection ensured that there was no bias in either trial for the tendency of investigators to prescribe one drug rather than the other, or for geographical location. A total of 1289 patients were enrolled, 669 in the tolterodine trial (TER 2 mg, n = 333; TER 4 mg, n = 336) and 620 in the oxybutynin trial (OER 5 mg, n = 313; OER 10 mg, n = 307). Fewer patients prematurely withdrew from the trial in the TER 4 mg group (12%) than either the OER 5 mg (19%; p = 0.01) or OER 10 mg groups (21%; p = 0.002). More patients in the OER 10 mg group than the TER 4 mg group withdrew because of poor tolerability (13% vs 6%; p = 0.001). After 8 weeks, 70% of patients in the TER 4 mg group perceived an improved bladder condition, compared with 60% in the TER 2 mg group, 59% in the OER 5 mg group and 60% in the OER 10 mg group (all p < 0.01 vs TER 4 mg). Response to therapy was greater in a subgroup of patients whose perception of bladder condition was moderate to severe at baseline (TER 4 mg 77% vs OER 10 mg 65%; p < 0.01). Dry mouth was dose-dependent with both agents, although differences between doses only reached statistical significance in the oxybutynin trial (OER 5 mg vs OER 10 mg; p = 0.05). Patients treated with TER 4 mg reported a significantly lower severity of dry mouth compared with OER 10 mg. In conclusion, the greater efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine ER 4 mg suggests improved clinical effectiveness compared with oxybutynin ER 10 mg. This study compared the clinical efficacy (determined from micturition diaries) and safety of 12 weeks' treatment with either tolterodine 2 mg twice daily, oxybutynin 5 mg three times daily or placebo in patients with an overactive bladder. A total of 277 patients were randomized and treated at 25 centers. Both tolterodine and oxybutynin significantly increased volume voided/micturition compared to placebo. Both treatment groups evoked greater decreases in micturitions per 24 hours and incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to placebo; however, only tolterodine was significantly better than placebo in reducing micturition frequency. Tolterodine and oxybutynin were equivalent in their effectiveness. Tolterodine was significantly better tolerated than oxybutynin when adverse events (particularly frequency and intensity of dry mouth), dose reduction and patient withdrawals were considered. Oxybutynin is an effective drug whose frequent adverse effects limit its clinical usefulness. Tolterodine has equivalent efficacy to oxybutynin, but with less severe adverse effects. This will allow patients to receive more effective treatment for their condition, with better compliance. We compared the tolerability and clinical efficacy of tolterodine with those of oxybutynin in patients with an overactive bladder using an upward oxybutynin dose titration strategy analogous to that used in routine clinical practice in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.
                In a randomized double-blind trial 378 male and female patients 50 years old or older with symptoms of overactive bladder (a urinary frequency of 8 or more voids per 24 hours with urgency and/or urge incontinence, that is 1 or more urge incontinence episodes per 24 hours) received 10 weeks of treatment with 2 mg. tolterodine twice daily/or an initial dose of 2.5 mg. oxybutynin twice daily, increasing to 5 mg. twice daily after 2 weeks of treatment. The main outcome measures were changes in voiding diary variables combined with detailed tolerability-safety assessments.
                Patients treated with tolterodine had significantly fewer adverse events (69% versus 81%, p = 0.01), notably dry mouth (37% versus 61%, p <0.0001), as well as a lower incidence of dose reduction (6% versus 25%, p <0.0001) than those in the oxybutynin group. Each agent had comparable efficacy for improving urinary symptoms. Tolterodine and oxybutynin caused a significant decrease (p = 0.0001) in the mean number of voids per 24 hours (-1.7 or -15% and -1.7 or -15%, respectively), urge incontinence episodes per 24 hours (-1.3 or -54% and -1.8 or -62%, respectively) and mean voided volume per void (33 ml. or 22% and 34 ml. or 23%) after 10 weeks of treatment.
                Tolterodine is as effective as oxybutynin for improving the symptoms of overactive bladder but it has superior tolerability. The combination of these qualities makes tolterodine the preferred pharmacological therapy for the long-term treatment of this condition. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new extended-release (ER), once-daily, capsule formulation of tolterodine, relative to placebo and the existing immediate-release (IR), twice-daily, tablet formulation, for treatment of the overactive bladder.
                This was a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. One thousand five hundred twenty-nine patients (81% women) with urinary frequency (eight or more micturitions every 24 hours) and urge incontinence (five or more episodes per week) were randomized to oral therapy with tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily (n = 507), tolterodine IR 2 mg twice daily (n = 514), or placebo (n = 508) for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed at the end of the treatment period on the basis of the micturition diary variables. Tolerability and safety were assessed by evaluating the adverse events, electrocardiogram parameters, laboratory values, and treatment withdrawals.
                Tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily (P = 0.0001) and tolterodine IR 2 mg twice daily (P = 0.0005) both significantly reduced the mean number of urge incontinence episodes per week compared with placebo. The median reduction in these episodes as a percentage of the baseline values was 71% for tolterodine ER, 60% for tolterodine IR, and 33% for placebo. The ER formulation was 18% more effective than the IR formulation (P <0.05). Treatment with both formulations of tolterodine was also associated with statistically significant improvements in all other micturition diary variables compared with placebo. For both formulations, the mean decreases in micturition frequency (P <0.0079) and pad usage (P <0.0145) were significant, and the mean volume voided per micturition increased (P = 0.0001). The rate of dry mouth (of any severity) was 23% for tolterodine ER, 30% for tolterodine IR, and 8% for placebo. The overall dry mouth rate for patients taking tolterodine ER was 23% lower than for tolterodine IR (P <0.02), and the rate of severe dry mouth in the ER group was only 1.8%. The rates of withdrawal were comparable for the two active groups and the placebo group. No safety concerns were noted.
                Tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of overactive bladder with no safety concerns. Tolterodine ER demonstrated an improved efficacy for reducing urge incontinence episodes and a lower frequency of dry mouth compared with the existing IR twice-daily formulation. To compare extended-release (ER) tolterodine and immediate-release (IR) oxybutynin with placebo in Japanese and Korean patients with an overactive bladder (OAB).
                Men and women aged >or= 20 years with symptoms of urinary urgency, urinary frequency (>or= 8 micturitions/24 h), urge incontinence (>or= 5 episodes/week) and symptoms of OAB for >or= 6 months were randomized to double-blind treatment with tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily, oxybutynin IR 3 mg three times daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Efficacy assessments included changes from baseline in numbers of incontinence episodes per week, voids/24 h and mean volume voided/void. Patient perceptions of bladder condition, urgency and treatment benefit were also assessed.
                In all, 608 patients were randomized to treatment with tolterodine (240), oxybutynin (246) or placebo (122). More patients prematurely withdrew on oxybutynin (23%) than with tolterodine (10.4%) or placebo (16.4%). After 12 weeks of treatment, the median number of incontinence episodes/week was reduced significantly more in the tolterodine (79%; P= 0.0027) and oxybutynin groups (76.5%; P= 0.0168) than on placebo (46.4%). There were also significantly greater improvements in the number of voids/24 h and volume voided/void with tolterodine and oxybutynin than with placebo. More patients in the tolterodine and oxybutynin than in the placebo groups reported improvements in perceived bladder condition, ability to hold urine and treatment benefit. Patients treated with oxybutynin reported more adverse events than those treated with tolterodine or placebo. Dry mouth was significantly more common with oxybutynin than with tolterodine (53.7% vs. 33.5%; P < 0.001), and occurred in 9.8% of placebo patients.
                Tolterodine ER has similar efficacy but is better tolerated than oxybutynin IR in Japanese and Korean patients with OAB. To assess in a phase 3a trial the efficacy of solifenacin succinate, a once-daily oral antimuscarinic agent in development at 5-mg and 10-mg dosage strengths, for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) (Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) compared with placebo in patients with symptoms of OAB, i.e. urgency, incontinence, and frequency, with additional objectives being to assess the safety and tolerability of solifenacin and to compare the efficacy and safety of solifenacin with tolterodine 2 mg twice daily.
                The study was an international, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, tolterodine- and placebo-controlled trial conducted at 98 centres. Adult patients with symptomatic OAB for > or = 3 months were eligible; after a single-blind 2-week placebo run-in period patients were randomized equally to a 12-week double-blind treatment with either tolterodine 2 mg twice daily, placebo, solifenacin 5 mg or 10 mg once daily. Efficacy variables included change from baseline in the mean number of urgency, incontinence and urge incontinence episodes, and change from baseline in voids/24 h and mean volume voided/void.
                In all, 1281 patients were enrolled, 1081 randomized and 1077 treated; 1033 were evaluated for efficacy. Compared with placebo, the change from baseline (-1.41, -32.7%) in the mean number of urgency episodes per 24 h was statistically significantly lower with solifenacin 5 mg (-2.85, -51.9%) and 10 mg (-3.07, -54.7%; both P < 0.001), but not with tolterodine (-2.05, -37.9%; P = 0.0511). There was a statistically insignificant decrease in episodes of incontinence with tolterodine (-1.14; P = 0.1122) but a significant decrease in patients treated with solifenacin 5 (-1.42; P = 0.008) and 10 mg (-1.45; P = 0.0038). Compared with placebo (-1.20, -8.1%) the mean number of voids/24 h was significantly lower in patients receiving tolterodine (-1.88, -15%; P = 0.0145), solifenacin 5 (-2.19, -17%) and 10 mg (-2.61, -20%; both P < 0.001). The mean volume voided/void was also significantly higher with all three active treatments (P < 0.001). Solifenacin was well tolerated; compared with placebo (4.9%), dry mouth (the most common side-effect), mostly mild, was reported in 18.6% of patients receiving tolterodine, 14.0% receiving 5 mg and 21.3% receiving 10 mg solifenacin.
                Solifenacin 5 and 10 mg once daily improved urgency and other symptoms of OAB, and was associated with an acceptable level of anticholinergic side-effects. Solifenacin demonstrated significantly favourable efficacy to side-effect ratio in treating symptomatic OAB. This double-blind, multicenter study compared the efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine (Pharmacia, Los Angeles, USA) with that of oxybutynin (Alza, Palo Alto, USA) in Asian patients with overactive bladder.
                Two-hundred-and-twenty-eight adults with overactive bladder symptoms were randomized to receive tolterodine 2 mg twice daily (bid) (n = 112) or oxybutynin 5 mg bid (n = 116). After 8 weeks' treatment, changes in micturition diary variables, patients' perception of treatment benefit, and tolerability endpoints were determined.
                The mean (+/- SD) number of micturitions/24 h decreased by 2.6 +/- 2.9 (-21%) with tolterodine and 1.8 +/- 4.2 (-15%) with oxybutynin (both P = 0.0001 vs baseline). The mean number of incontinence episodes/24 h decreased by 2.2 +/- 2.3 (-85%) in the tolterodine group and by 1.4 +/- 1.8 (-58%) in the oxybutynin group (both P = 0.0001 vs baseline). Patient perception of treatment benefit was over 70% in each treatment group. Adverse events were significantly lower in the tolterodine group compared with oxybutynin-treated patients (55% vs 82%; P = 0.001). Dry mouth was reported by significantly fewer patients on tolterodine, compared with oxybutynin (35% vs 63%; P = 0.001) and withdrawals due to adverse events were lower in the tolterodine group than with those treated with oxybutynin (10% vs 16%). There were no safety concerns.
                Tolterodine 2 mg bid is equally or more effective than oxybutynin 5 mg bid in the treatment of Asian patients with overactive bladder, and shows significantly better tolerability. This may enhance compliance during long-term treatment. To assess the tolerability and efficacy of propiverine and oxybutynin in patients with urgency and urge incontinence in a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.
                In all, 366 patients (149 on propiverine, 145 oxybutynin and 72 placebo, ratio 2:2:1) with urgency and urge incontinence were recruited in 32 study centres. Propiverine (group 1, 15 mg three times daily), oxybutynin (group 2, 5 mg twice daily) or placebo (group 3) were administered for 4 weeks, using the double-dummy technique. The dosages were selected specifically to compare the tolerability profile of propiverine with the commonly used therapeutic dosage of oxybutynin. Tolerability was assessed by directly questioning the patients about adverse events at four visits (V-1 before and V0 after a 1-week 'washout' period, V1 after 1 week and V4 after 4 weeks of treatment) during a 5-week surveillance period, and by tolerability ratings of the physicians. Efficacy was assessed using urodynamics at V0 and V4, evaluating the cystometric bladder capacity at maximal and first desire to void, and postvoid residual urine, according to the criteria of the International Continence Society. Additionally, a voiding protocol, overall assessment of clinical symptomatology and efficacy ratings by the physicians were documented.
                A remarkably high percentage of adverse events was reported in the washout period (VO: 13%, 16% and 18% in groups 1-3, respectively). At V4, the clinically most relevant symptom (dry mouth) occurred in 53% of patients in group 1, in 67% of group 2 and in 28% of group 3. Furthermore, dry mouth was less severe in group 1 than group 2. In contrast to groups 2 and 3, only patients in group 1 showed increasing tolerability during the treatment (from V1 to V4). These tolerability results were further supported by the overall tolerability assessment ('very good' or 'good' tolerability in 67% of group 1, in 59% of group 2 and in 83% of group 3). The urodynamic assessment of efficacy (comparing V0 and V4) showed a statistically significant increase in the mean (sd) maximal cystometric bladder capacity in group 1, being 222 (77) mL at V0 and 311 (125) mL at V4, an increase of 89 (108) mL, and in group 2, at 226 (75) mL and 322 (123) mL, an increase of 96 (106) mL, compared with group 3, at 211 (77) mL and 263 (93) mL, an increase of only 52 (92) mL. The cystometric bladder capacity at first desire to void also increased in group 1 (93 to 160 mL) and group 2 (89 to 160 mL), whereas in group 3 there were only minor changes (93 to 120 mL). Changes in the residual urine volume within and between the treatment groups were minimal and clinically irrelevant. The overall assessment of efficacy showed significant differences between the drugs when compared with placebo.
                Propiverine is a safe and effective drug in the treatment of urgency and urge incontinence; it is as effective as oxybutynin, but the incidence of dry mouth and its severity is less with propiverine than with oxybutynin. The availability of alternative pharmacotherapeutics such as propiverine should reduce the therapeutic failure rate and improves the success rate in the treatment of patients suffering from urgency and urge incontinence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new PO controlled-release (CR) QD oxybutynin tablet relative to PO immediate-release (IR) TID oxybutynin in patients with urge urinary incontinence (UI).
                In this multicenter, double-blind trial, patients with UI (> or = 7 episode/wk) and frequency (> or = 8 micturitions/d) were randomized to CR or IR oxybutynin for 6 weeks. Patients initiated treatment at 15 mg/d and the dose was adjusted (in 5-mg/d increments) over 2 weeks according to tolerability. Efficacy (UI episodes, voids, absorbent pads used, urgency, and volume voided per micturition) was assessed during the final 2 weeks of treatment. Tolerability was assessed by evaluating adverse events and treatment withdrawals.
                Of the 125 patients randomized, 94 (75%) were evaluable for efficacy; tolerability was assessed in all patients. In the CR group, 48 patients (91%) were women and 5 (9%) were men; the mean (SD) age was 58.0 (12.4) years (range, 26-78 years). In the IR group, 37 patients (90%) were women and 4 (10%) were men; the mean (SD) age was 60.6 (14.8) years (range, 26-83 years). Both CR and IR oxybutynin significantly reduced the mean number of total UI episodes per week (both P < 0.001 vs baseline). Both treatments produced equivalent reductions in mean voiding frequency and urinary urgency (all P < 0.001 vs. baseline). Significantly more patients rated CR oxybutynin tolerable on the initial dose of 15 mg/d (P = 0.020) and completed the study at a dose of > or = 15 mg/d (P = 0.018). Dry mouth was the most common adverse event, reported by 68% and 72% of patients in the CR and IR oxybutynin groups, respectively.
                Among the patients with urge UI included in this study, CR oxybutynin was as effective as IR oxybutynin for improving primary symptoms, with the additional benefit of QD administration. Various antimuscarinic agents have been developed for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). More data comparing these agents are still required. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of solifenacin and tolterodine in Taiwanese patients with OAB symptoms.
                This was a prospective, randomized, open-label study. A total of 75 patients (25 men and 50 women) with OAB symptoms were randomized to treatment with solifenacin (n = 39) or tolterodine (n = 36). Efficacy and safety variables were assessed and compared with the baseline and between the two groups.
                At week 12, solifenacin and tolterodine demonstrated equal efficacy in reducing the number of micturition (-2.56 ±3.31 vs. -2.44 ± 4.56, p = 0.58), urgency (-1.70 ± 3.07 vs. -1.15 ± 2.68, p =0.37) and incontinence (-2.79 ± 2.82 vs. -4.67 ± 9.29, p =0.28) episodes per 24 hours. There was no difference in improvement of the quality of life. The patient and physician assessments of treatment benefit were not statistically different for solifenacin and tolterodine (p = 0.23 and p = 0.52, respectively), with the majority showing benefits in both groups. The incidence of major adverse events, including dry mouth (18.0%vs. 8.3%, p = 0.31) and constipation (12.8%vs. 2.8%, p = 0.20) was not significantly different. Compared with baseline, the severity of dry mouth did not increase in either group.
                Both solifenacin and tolterodine are effective in treating key OAB symptoms, including urinary frequency, urgency and incontinence in the Taiwanese population. Both medications are comparably effective and safe, with the most common adverse effects being dry mouth and constipation.
                Copyright © 2010 Formosan Medical Association & Elsevier. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. To compare two new generation antimuscarinics at their recommended doses for treatment of overactive bladder syndrome (OAB).
                A prospective, double blind, double-dummy, two-arm, parallel-group, 12-week study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of solifenacin 5 or 10 mg and tolterodine extended release (ER) 4 mg once daily in OAB patients. After 4 weeks of treatment patients had the option to request a dose increase but were dummied throughout as approved product labelling only allowed an increase for those on solifenacin.
                Solifenacin, with a flexible dosing regimen, showed greater efficacy to tolterodine in decreasing urgency episodes, incontinence, urge incontinence and pad usage and increasing the volume voided per micturition. More solifenacin treated patients became continent and reported improvements in perception of bladder condition assessments. The majority of side effects were mild to moderate in nature, and discontinuations were comparable and low in both groups.
                Solifenacin, with a flexible dosing regimen, was found to be superior to tolterodine ER with respect to the majority of the efficacy variables. • To show the superior efficacy of fesoterodine over tolterodine extended release (ER) in a placebo-controlled overactive bladder (OAB) trial with predefined treatment comparisons for both diary measures and patient-reported outcomes.
                • In this 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy trial, subjects reporting >1 urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episode and ≥8 micturitions per 24 h at baseline were randomized to fesoterodine (4 mg for 1 week, 8 mg for 11 weeks), tolterodine ER 4 mg, or placebo. • Subjects completed 3-day bladder diaries, the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and the Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at baseline and weeks 1, 4 and 12 and the OAB Questionnaire at baseline and week 12.
                • A total of 2417 subjects were randomized. At week 12, fesoterodine 8 mg showed superiority over tolterodine ER 4 mg and placebo on UUI episodes (primary endpoint), micturitions, urgency and most other diary endpoints, and on the PPBC, UPS and all OAB Questionnaire scales and domains (all P < 0.05). • Superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg over tolterodine ER 4 mg was seen as early as week 4 (3 weeks after escalation to fesoterodine 8 mg). At week 1, fesoterodine 4 mg was superior to placebo on most diary variables, the PPBC and the UPS (all P < 0.05). Dry mouth and constipation rates were 28% and 4% with fesoterodine, 13% and 3% with tolterodine ER, and 5% and 2% with placebo. • Discontinuation rates as a result of adverse events were 5%, 3% and 2% for fesoterodine, tolterodine ER and placebo, respectively.
                • In this randomized study, which is the largest to compare antimuscarinic efficacy performed to date, fesoterodine 8 mg was superior to tolterodine ER 4 mg for UUI episodes, micturitions and urgency episodes, as well as for self-reported patient assessments of bladder-related problems, urgency, symptom bother and health-related quality of life. • The superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg over tolterodine ER 4 mg was observed as early as 3 weeks after escalation from fesoterodine 4 mg for most outcomes. These data may have important implications for the clinical management of OAB patients previously treated with tolterodine ER.
                © 2010 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL. We compared the short-term efficacy, safety and tolerability of transdermal versus oral oxybutynin in adults with urge urinary incontinence.
                Volunteers with detrusor instability currently responding to oral immediate release oxybutynin were enrolled in our study. Those patients presenting with recurrence of incontinent symptoms after a 2-week washout underwent confirmatory cystometrogram with subsequent randomization to transdermal or oral treatment. Matching active and placebo medications included matrix patches applied twice weekly and capsules taken 2 or 3 times daily. Dose titration was based on anticholinergic symptoms. Outcome measures included comparison of baseline to 6 week changes in incontinence episodes on a 3 day urinary diary, a visual analog scale for efficacy and anticholinergic symptoms reported on a questionnaire. Safety monitoring included adverse events and skin tolerability of the transdermal system.
                A total of 76 patients were enrolled and 74 completed at least 4 weeks of treatment. Mean age in the transdermal and oral groups was 64 and 63 years, and 87% and 97% were female, respectively. Daily incontinent episodes decreased in the transdermal and oral groups (7.3 to 2.4 [66%] and 7.4 to 2.6 [72%], respectively, p = 0.39). The visual analog scale reduction in urinary leakage improved from washout in both groups (p <0.0001) with no difference between them (p = 0.9). Dry mouth occurred in significantly fewer patients in the transdermal (38%) compared with those in the oral group (94%, p <0.001). Of the patients in the transdermal group 67% noticed a reduction in dry mouth severity compared with previous oral treatment, and 90% had none or mild skin erythema.
                Transdermal delivery of oxybutynin resulted in comparable efficacy and a significantly improved anticholinergic side effect profile compared with oral administration in adults with urge urinary incontinence. To investigate the efficacy and safety of tolterodine, a new antimuscarinic agent, and define the optimum dosage in patients with symptoms of detrusor instability (urgency, increased frequency of micturition and/or urge incontinence).
                A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study was carried out; after a 1-week run-in period to establish baseline values, 81 patients were randomized to receive placebo or tolterodine 0.5, 1, 2 or 4 mg twice daily for 2 weeks. Micturition (diary) variables, urodynamics and subjective urinary symptoms were assessed after 2 weeks' treatment.
                A per-protocol analysis of efficacy in 64 patients showed dose-related improvements in recorded micturition and urodynamic variables, e.g. at a dosage of 2 mg twice daily, the frequency of micturition, episodes of incontinence and pad use were reduced by 20%, 46% and 29%, respectively, while the volume at first contraction increased by 89 mL. The 4 mg dosage was associated with a large increase in residual urinary volume and an increased incidence of dry mouth. The incidence of adverse events (mainly mild or moderate antimuscarinic effects) was comparable with placebo at tolterodine dosages of < or = 2 mg. No serious adverse events were observed and tolterodine had no clinically significant impact on electrocardiographic or laboratory findings.
                The results indicate that tolterodine offers an effective treatment for the symptoms of detrusor instability. The optimum dosage appears to be 1-2 mg twice daily. Tolterodine is a new competitive muscarinic receptor antagonist developed for the treatment of the unstable bladder. A total of 242 patients were enrolled in a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted over a period of 4 weeks in patients with detrusor overactivity and symptoms of frequency, urgency, and urge incontinence. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of tolterodine given at 1 or 2 mg b.i.d. versus placebo. At week 4 a statistically significant increase in the volume at first contraction (p = 0.030) and maximal cystometric capacity (p = 0.034) was only in the tolterodine 2 mg b.i.d. group. Tolterodine was safe and generally well tolerated. The incidence of dry mouth, as the most commonly reported adverse event, was only 9% and of mild to moderate intensity. Our objectives were to ascertain the tolerability and efficacy of trospium chloride in doses of 20 mg twice daily for long-term therapy (52 weeks) in patients with urge syndrome. The trial comprised a total of 358 patients with urge syndrome or urge incontinence. After randomisation in the ratio of 3:1, participants were treated continuously for 52 weeks with either trospium chloride (20 mg twice daily) or oxybutynin (5 mg twice daily). At intervals of 4-8 weeks, patients were physically examined with measurements of blood pressure and pulse rate, were questioned about any adverse events, checked for compliance and underwent relevant laboratory tests. As an additional safety measure, an ECG was made at 26 and 52 weeks. Urodynamic measurements were performed at the beginning, and at 26 and 52 weeks to determine the maximal cystometric bladder capacity. Among others things, the frequencies of micturition, incontinence and number of urgency events were recorded in patient diary protocols in weeks 0, 2, 26 and 52. The evaluation of vital parameters, laboratory results and ECGs did not show any relevant changes attributable to the action of the anticholinergics. Analysis of the micturition diary clearly indicated a reduction of the micturition frequency, incontinence frequency, and a reduction of the number of urgencies in both treatment groups. Mean maximum cystometric bladder capacity increased during treatment with trospium chloride by 92 ml after 26 weeks and 115 ml after 52 weeks (P=0.001). Further comparison with oxybutynin did not reveal any statistically significant differences in urodynamic variables between the drugs. Adverse events occurred in 64.8% of the patients treated with trospium chloride and 76.7% of those treated with oxybutynin. The main symptom encountered in both treatment group was dryness of the mouth. For patients on trospium chloride, the estimated risk of an unexpected adverse event was 0.027 per patient per week for all adverse events and 0.009 for dryness of the mouth, resulting in a considerably lower risk during treatment given with trospium chloride than with oxybutynin (0.045 and 0.021, respectively). An overall assessment for each of the drugs reveals a comparable efficacy level and a better benefit-risk ratio for trospium chloride than for oxybutynin due to better tolerability. To evaluate the effects of tolterodine and oxybutynin on visual accommodation, pupillary diameter, intraocular pressure and tear secretion in women with overactive bladder.
                One hundred and four eyes from 52 consecutive female patients (age range: 22-60 years) with a urodynamic diagnosis of overactive bladder were prospectively investigated. Patients with a history of ocular disease or surgery were excluded. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group I received 2 mg tolterodine bid and Group II received 5 mg oxybutynin tid. All patients were evaluated at baseline (day 0) and after 1 month of treatment (day 28) by an ophthalmologist who was blinded to the medication. At each time point, a complete ophthalmic examination was performed and accommodation amplitude (AA), and pupillary diameter (PD) in dim and bright light were recorded. As well, tear secretion was assessed based on tear film break-up time and Schirmer I-test results. Statistical comparisons were made using the chi-square test, Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test, as appropriate.
                Twenty-eight patients (56 eyes) received tolterodine and 24 patients (48 eyes) received oxybutynin. The mean ages of the two groups were similar (P = 0.523). After 4 weeks of treatment, AA was significantly lower in the oxybutynin treated group (P = 0.003, 95% CI 0.15, 0.62) whereas there was no significant change in AA in the tolterodine treated group (P = 0.155, 95% CI -0.042, 0.86). At day 28, PD in dim light was significantly larger in the tolterodine treated group (P = 0.031, 95% CI -0.82, -0.06), whereas no significant change in PD in dim light was noted in the oxybutynin treated group (P = 0.330, 95% CI -0.38, 0.18). Neither group showed a significant change in PD in bright light values on day 28 (P > 0.05 for both). In each group, the differences from day 0 to day 28 for intraocular pressure, and Schirmer-I results were insignificant (P > 0.05 for all). Both groups had significantly shorter tear film break-up time after 1 month of therapy (P = 0.014 (95% CI 0.47, 3.81) and P = 0.02 (95% CI 1.14, 4.61) for the tolterodine and oxybutynin treated groups, respectively).
                Four weeks of standard-dose oxybutynin treatment in women with overactive bladder decreases AA significantly, whereas the same duration of standard-dose tolterodine does not have this effect. However, tolterodine seemed to affect PD in dim light. One month of treatment with either of these anticholinergic drugs shortens tear film break-up time significantly. Concerning ocular side-effects, tolterodine seems to offer an advantage over oxybutynin because it does not affect AA, however, the shorter tear film break-up time with both agents suggests potential problems for patients who already have dry eye. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of fesoterodine 8 mg with tolterodine extended-release (ER) 4 mg and placebo in a randomized clinical trial of patients with an overactive bladder (OAB).
                In this 12-week double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, eligible patients reported OAB symptoms for > or = 3 months and recorded > or = 8 voids and > or = 1 urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episode per 24 h in 3-day bladder diaries at baseline. Patients were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to fesoterodine (4 mg for 1 week then 8 mg for 11 weeks); tolterodine ER 4 mg; or placebo (with sham dose escalation for tolterodine ER and placebo). Endpoints were changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint), total and nocturnal voids, urgency episodes, severe urgency episodes, and frequency-urgency sum per 24 h; mean voided volume per void (MVV); and the OAB questionnaire (OAB-q), Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), and Urgency Perception Scale (UPS). Safety and tolerability were assessed and summarized over the 12-week study period.
                Fesoterodine (636 patients) significantly improved UUI episodes at week 12 (primary endpoint) compared with tolterodine ER (641 patients; P = 0.017) and placebo (313 patients; P < 0.001). Fesoterodine also produced significantly greater improvements than tolterodine ER in MVV (P = 0.005). Fesoterodine significantly improved all diary endpoints compared with placebo (P < 0.001), except for nocturnal voids (P = 0.327). Tolterodine ER significantly improved all diary endpoints vs placebo (P < 0.001), except for nocturnal voids (P = 0.506) and MVV (P = 0.103). Diary dry rates (the proportion of patients reporting no UUI episodes at endpoint among those with one or more UUI episodes at baseline) were significantly higher with fesoterodine (64%) than with tolterodine ER (57%; P = 0.015) and placebo (45%; P < 0.001). Improvements in PPBC, UPS and OAB-q scale and domain scores at week 12 were all significantly better with fesoterodine than placebo (all P < 0.001) and tolterodine ER (all P < 0.05) except for the OAB-q Sleep domain vs tolterodine ER (P = 0.081). Dry mouth and constipation rates were 28% and 5% in the fesoterodine group, 16% and 4% in the tolterodine ER group, and 6% and 3% with placebo, respectively. Discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events were 6%, 4% and 2% in the fesoterodine, tolterodine ER, and placebo groups, respectively.
                In patients with OAB, fesoterodine 8 mg showed superior efficacy over tolterodine ER 4 mg and placebo in reducing UUI episodes (primary endpoint) and in improving most patient-reported outcome measures. Both active treatments were well tolerated. To evaluate the effect of once-daily, extended-release tolterodine on urinary urgency in patients with overactive bladder.
                Patients with urinary frequency (eight or more micturitions per 24 hours) and urge incontinence (five or more episodes per week) were randomized to oral treatment with tolterodine extended release 4 mg once daily (n=398) or placebo (n=374) for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by use of patient perception evaluations.
                The results presented are a secondary analysis of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Of patients treated with tolterodine extended release, 44% reported improved urgency symptoms (compared with 32% for placebo), and 62% reported improved bladder symptoms (placebo, 48%) (both P<.001 compared with placebo). The odds of reducing urgency and improving bladder symptoms were 1.68 and 1.78 times greater, respectively, for patients in the tolterodine extended release group than for patients receiving placebo. In response to urgency, there was a more than six-fold increase in the proportion of patients able to finish a task before voiding in the tolterodine extended release group. The proportion of patients unable to hold urine upon experiencing urgency was also decreased by 58% with tolterodine, compared with 32% with placebo (P<.001). The proportion of patients reporting "much benefit" from treatment was greater for tolterodine extended release than for placebo (43% versus 24%; P<.001). The only adverse events with an incidence of greater than 5% were dry mouth, headache, and constipation, with only dry mouth markedly more frequent with tolterodine than with placebo.
                Tolterodine extended release has demonstrable efficacy in reducing the severity of urinary urgency and is associated with improvements in overactive bladder symptoms that are meaningful to patients. To evaluate the effects of darifenacin, an M3 selective receptor antagonist, compared with oxybutynin, on ambulatory urodynamics, salivary flow, heart rate and visual nearpoint in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).
                A double-blind, randomized, crossover study (n=65) with three treatment cohorts: darifenacin immediate release (IR) 2.5 mg three times a day (t.i.d.) or oxybutynin 2.5 mg t.i.d.; darifenacin controlled release (CR) 15 mg once daily (q.d.) or oxybutynin 5 mg t.i.d.; darifenacin CR 30 mg q.d. or oxybutynin 5 mg t.i.d. Within cohorts, patients received 7 days' treatment with each agent separated by 14 days' washout.
                All active treatments improved urodynamic parameters. Both darifenacin CR doses had significantly less effect on salivary flow than oxybutynin. Effects on urodynamic parameters, heart rate and visual nearpoint were comparable.
                Ambulatory urodynamics appears to be an innovative and potentially useful investigative tool in the evaluation of the efficacy of new therapeutic agents. Darifenacin CR is an efficacious therapy for OAB with comparable effects on urodynamic parameters but producing significantly less dry mouth than oxybutynin. We compared the efficacy and safety of once daily controlled and immediate release oxybutynin for incontinence.
                This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active control, parallel study was designed to evaluate urge urinary incontinence episodes using a 7-day diary.
                A total of 97 women and 8 men 34 to 76 years old with urge incontinence or mixed incontinence with a clinically significant urge component were enrolled in the study. The number of weekly urge incontinence episodes decreased from 27.4 to 4.8 after controlled and from 23.4 to 3.1 after immediate release oxybutynin (p = 0.56), and total incontinence episodes decreased from 29.3 to 6 and from 26.3 to 3.8, respectively (p = 0.6). Weekly urge incontinence episodes from baseline to end of study also decreased to 84% after controlled and 88% after immediate release oxybutynin (p = 0.7). Continence was achieved in 41% of the controlled and 40% of the immediate release group (p = 0.9). Dry mouth of any severity was reported by 68 and 87% of the controlled and immediate release groups, respectively (p = 0.04), and moderate or severe dry mouth occurred in 25 and 46%, respectively (p = 0.03).
                Participants taking a single daily does of controlled release oxybutynin had similar reductions in urge incontinence and total incontinence episodes compared to those taking oxybutynin 1 to 4 times daily. A lower incidence of dry mouth was reported for controlled release oxybutynin. To investigate the clinical safety and efficacy of two dosages of tolterodine in older patients with symptoms attributable to overactive bladder.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, phase III study.
                Incontinence, older care, urological, and urogynecological clinics in the United Kingdom, France, and the Republic of Ireland.
                One hundred and seventy-seven older patients (age > or =65 years) with symptoms of urinary urgency, increased frequency of micturition (> or =8 micturitions/24 hours), and/or urge incontinence (> or =1 episode/24 hours).
                Tolterodine 1 mg or 2 mg twice daily (bid), or placebo, for 4 weeks.
                Safety and tolerability were evaluated through spontaneously reported adverse events, electrocardiogram, and blood pressure measurements. Efficacy was assessed using micturition diary variables: mean change from baseline in frequency of micturition and number of incontinence episodes/24 hours.
                The mean age of the patient population was 75 years. Overall, > or =87% of patients completed the study. Neither dosage of tolterodine was associated with serious drug-related adverse events during the study. No cardiac arrythmogenic events were noted. Dry mouth (mild to moderate intensity) was the most common adverse event in both the placebo and tolterodine treatment groups. Three percent of patients in the tolterodine 2 mg bid group discontinued treatment because of dry mouth, compared with 2% of placebo-treated patients. Compared with placebo, statistically significant decreases in micturition frequency were apparent in both tolterodine treatment groups. Furthermore, patients treated with tolterodine 2 mg bid had statistically significant decreases in urge incontinence episodes/24 hours and increases in volume voided per micturition compared with placebo.
                Tolterodine (taken for 4 weeks) is safe and shows efficacy, particularly at a dosage of 2 mg bid, in the treatment of older patients with urinary symptoms attributable to overactive bladder. To compare the effects of propiverine and oxybutynin on ambulatory urodynamic monitoring (AUM) parameters, safety, and tolerability in patients with overactive bladder.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, crossover study. Patients (n = 77) received two of the following treatments during two 2-week periods: propiverine 20 mg once daily, propiverine 15 mg three times daily, oxybutynin 5 mg three times daily, and placebo. AUM parameters, salivary flow, visual near point, and heart rate were assessed.
                A consistent order in the efficacy between active treatment groups was observed for the reduction in mean involuntary detrusor contractions (IDCs; oxybutynin 15 mg </= propiverine 45 mg </= propiverine 20 mg). Differences between the oxybutynin and propiverine 20 mg groups were statistically significant for several AUM endpoints. Statistically significant differences between the oxybutynin and both propiverine groups were also noted in salivary flow rate and heart rate (oxybutynin 15 mg < both propiverine regimens) and in heart rate variability (both propiverine regimens < oxybutynin 15 mg). All active treatments lengthened visual near point. The incidence of dry mouth was significantly more pronounced in the oxybutynin group than in either propiverine group. Treatment with propiverine 45 mg resulted in the highest rates of constipation, lengthening of the visual near point, and effects on heart rate.
                Oxybutynin 15 mg was more effective than propiverine 20 mg in reducing symptomatic and asymptomatic IDCs in ambulatory patients. The primary differences between the two drugs were the incidence and type of adverse events, which varied with the antimuscarinic receptor specificity of each agent. To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a new, once-daily extended-release (ER) formulation of tolterodine in treating overactive bladder in older (> or =65) and younger (<65) patients.
                A 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
                An international study conducted at 167 medical centers.
                One thousand fifteen patients (43.1% aged > or =65) with urge incontinence and urinary frequency.
                Patients were randomized to treatment with tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily (qd) (n = 507) or placebo (n = 508) for 12 weeks.
                Efficacy, measured with micturition charts (incontinence episodes, micturitions, volume voided per micturition) and subjective patient assessments, safety, and tolerability endpoints were evaluated, relative to placebo, according to two age cohorts: younger than 65 and 65 and older.
                Mean age in the older and younger patient cohorts was 74 (range 65-93) and 51 (range 20-64), respectively. Compared with placebo, significant improvements in micturition chart variables with tolterodine ER showed no age-related differences. Irrespective of age, significantly more tolterodine ER recipients than placebo recipients reported an improvement in urgency symptoms. After 12 weeks of treatment with tolterodine ER, a fivefold increase in the percentage of patients able to finish tasks before voiding in response to urgency was noted in both age groups (<65: from 6.5-32.8%, > or =65: from 5.1-26.2%). Tolterodine ER recipients, irrespective of age, also had significant improvements in their bladder condition than did placebo recipients. Overall, a greater percentage of patients, irrespective of age, perceived any benefit with tolterodine ER than with placebo (P <.001). Dry mouth (of any severity) was the most common adverse event in both the tolterodine ER and placebo treatment arms, irrespective of age (<65: ER 22.7%, placebo 8.1%; > or =65: ER 24.3%, placebo 7.2%). Few patients (<2%) experienced severe dry mouth. No central nervous system, visual, cardiac (per electrocardiogram), or laboratory safety concerns were noted. Withdrawal rates due to adverse events on tolterodine ER 4 mg qd were comparable in the two age cohorts (<65: 5.5%; > or =65: 5.1%; P =.87).
                The new, once-daily ER formulation of tolterodine is efficacious, safe, and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with symptoms of overactive bladder, irrespective of age. To compare the efficacy of tolterodine plus simplified bladder training (BT) with tolterodine alone in patients with an overactive bladder.
                In a multicentre, single-blind study at 51 Scandinavian centres, 505 patients aged >or= 18 years with symptoms of urinary frequency (>or= 8 micturitions/24 h) and urgency, with or without urge incontinence, were randomized to oral treatment with either tolterodine 2 mg twice daily plus simplified BT or tolterodine alone. Changes in voiding diary variables were evaluated after 2, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment. The patients' perceptions of their bladder symptoms and tolerability (adverse events) were also determined.
                In all, 501 patients (75% women) were evaluable on an intention-to-treat basis (244 on tolterodine + BT and 257 on tolterodine alone). Tolterodine significantly reduced the voiding frequency and increased the volume voided per void at all sample times; these effects were significantly increased by adding BT. At the end of the study the median percentage reduction in voiding frequency was greater with tolterodine + BT than with tolterodine alone (33% vs 25%, P < 0.001), while the median percentage increase in volume voided per void was 31% with tolterodine + BT and 20% with tolterodine alone (P < 0.001). There was a median of 81% fewer incontinence episodes than at baseline with tolterodine alone, which was not significantly different from that with tolterodine + BT (- 87%). The two groups had comparable median percentage reductions in urgency episodes. Some 76% of patients on tolterodine + BT reported an improvement in their bladder symptoms relative to baseline, compared with 71% on tolterodine alone. Tolterodine was well tolerated; the most common adverse event was mild dry mouth.
                Tolterodine 2 mg twice daily is an effective and well tolerated treatment for an overactive bladder, the effectiveness of which can be augmented by a simplified BT regimen. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of propiverine and oxybutynin in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity.
                Patients were eligible, if at least 18 years of age and suffering from neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Eligibility also required a maximum cystometric capacity less than 300 ml. After a one-week run-in period, propiverine 15 mg t.i.d. or oxybutynin 5mg t.i.d. were administered for 21 days. As primary efficacy outcomes urodynamic parameters were assessed. As tolerability outcome the percentage of patients with newly manifesting anticholinergic adverse events was taken.
                131 patients were recruited at 20 study centers. The maximum cystometric capacity (ml) was increased significantly in the propiverine group from 198 (+/-110) to 309 (+/-166), and in the oxybutynin group from 164 (+/-64) to 298 (+/-125). Similarly, maximum detrusor pressure during the filling phase (cm H(2)O) was lowered significantly in the propiverine group from 56.8 (+/-36.2) to 37.8 (+/-31.6), and in the oxybutynin group from 68.6 (+/-34.5) to 43.1 (+/-29.2). No significant differences resulted between treatment groups. Anticholinergic adverse events were reported less frequently in the propiverine compared to the oxybutynin group (63.0% versus 77.8%). Dryness of the mouth, the most frequent adverse event, was reported significantly less (47.1% versus 67.2%; p=0.02) in the propiverine compared to the oxybutynin group.
                Propiverine and oxybutynin are equally effective in increasing bladder capacity and lowering bladder pressure in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. The trend for better tolerability of propiverine compared to oxybutynin achieved significance for dryness of the mouth. Overactive bladder (OAB) has a significant impact on a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study assessed the HRQoL of Japanese OAB patients following 12 weeks' treatment with tolterodine extended release (ER) or oxybutynin. A total of 293 patients with symptoms of OAB were randomized for treatment with tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily (n=114), oxybutynin 3 mg three times daily (n=122) or a placebo (n=57). Treatment efficacy and safety assessments were made over the 12-week period. HRQoL was assessed using the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ). Patients receiving tolterodine ER or oxybutynin showed a significant (P<0.05) improvement in the Incontinence Impact, Role Limitations and most other KHQ domains compared with the placebo. These changes in HRQoL corresponded with significant (P<0.05) improvements in micturition diary variables for patients receiving tolterodine ER and oxybutynin compared with placebo. Our findings demonstrate that Japanese OAB patients receiving tolterodine ER or oxybutynin experienced overall improvement in their quality of life. To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of tolterodine compared to placebo in patients with an overactive bladder.
                A double-blind, multi-centre phase III study in France and Belgium 251 patients with overactive bladder symptoms, and urodynamically verified detrusor overactivity, were randomised to receive 4-week treatment with either placebo or tolterodine 1 or 2mg twice daily (bd). Efficacy was evaluated from patient micturition diaries. Safety and tolerability endpoints were also evaluated.
                After 4-week treatment, the number of incontinence episodes/24h decreased significantly relative to placebo in the tolterodine 1 and 2 mgbd groups (P=0.045 and P=0.0089, respectively). Both dosages of tolterodine increased volume voided per micturition compared with placebo (P=0.055 and P=0.056, respectively), although significant decreases in micturition frequency were not apparent. Tolterodine was safe and well tolerated, few patients were withdrawn due to adverse events. Dry mouth, mainly of mild-to-moderate intensity, was the most common adverse event. No clinically relevant changes in blood pressure or laboratory safety variables were reported.
                Tolterodine is effective, safe and well tolerated for the treatment of symptoms of an overactive bladder, particularly urge incontinence. Propiverine and tolterodine were compared with respect to efficacy, tolerability and impact on the quality of life in the treatment of patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity.
                In a randomised, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial, patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity were treated with 15 mg propiverine twice daily or 2mg tolterodine twice daily over a period of 28 days. The maximum cystometric capacity was determined at baseline and after 4 weeks of therapy. The difference of both values was used as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were voided volume per micturition, evaluation of efficacy (by the investigator), tolerability, post void residual urine, and quality of life.
                The mean maximum cystometric capacity increased significantly (p < 0.01) in both groups. The volume at first urge and the frequency/volume chart parameters also showed relevant improvements during treatment. 42/100 patients in the propiverine group and 43/102 in the tolterodine group experienced adverse events. The most common adverse event, dry mouth, occurred in 20 patients in the propiverine group and in 19 patients in the tolterodine group. The scores for the quality of life improved comparably in both groups.
                The study demonstrates comparable efficacy, tolerability, and improvement in the quality of life of 15 mg propiverine twice-daily and 2mg tolterodine twice-daily in the treatment of the symptoms of idiopathic detrusor overactivity. A proportion of patients with detrusor hyperreflexia who are unresponsive to oral oxybutynin often benefit from intravesical oxybutynin instillation. To our knowledge the precise mode of action of this method is obscure.
                In 12 patients with detrusor hyperreflexia who were previously unresponsive to oral and intravesical passive diffusion of 5 mg. oxybutynin we administered 5 mg. oxybutynin orally as well as increased doses of 15 mg. oxybutynin intravesically with passive diffusion and with 15 mA. associated electric current. Each administration mode per patient was associated with an 8-hour urodynamic monitoring session during which oxybutynin and N-desethyl oxybutynin plasma levels, and intravesical oxybutynin uptake were measured.
                A dose of 5 mg. oxybutynin orally induced no urodynamic improvement with an area under the plasma concentration time curve of combined N-desethyl oxybutynin plus oxybutynin of 16,297 ng./8 hours and an area under the curve ratio of N-desethyl oxybutynin-to-oxybutynin of 11:1. Passive diffusion oxybutynin resulted in 12 mg. oxybutynin intravesical uptake and significant improvement in 3 of 8 urodynamic measurements, although the area under the curve of combined N-desethyl oxybutynin plus oxybutynin was only 2,123 ng./8 hours and the N-desethyl oxybutynin-to-oxybutynin ratio was 1.1:1.0. Electromotive administration of oxybutynin resulted in almost complete intravesical uptake of the 15 mg. dose, significant improvement in all 8 urodynamic measurements and an increased oxybutynin level versus oral and passive diffusion, although the area under the curve of combined N-desethyl oxybutynin plus oxybutynin was 4,574 ng./8 hours and the N-desethyl oxybutynin-to-oxybutynin ratio was inverted at 1.0:1.4. The oral dose of 5 mg. oxybutynin caused anticholinergic side effects in 8 of the 12 patients. Neither intravesical passive diffusion nor electromotive administration caused side effects with an uptake of 12 and 15 mg., respectively.
                A large proportion of intravesical oxybutynin is sequestered, probably in the urothelium. Intravesical oxybutynin administration confers therapeutic benefits via localized direct action within the bladder wall. To compare the efficacy of flexible-dose solifenacin 5/10 mg with and without simplified bladder training in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome.
                SOLAR (SOLifenacin Alone and with simplified bladder Re-training) was a multicentre, prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open-label study in patients with OAB. After a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in, 643 patients were randomized to treatment with either solifenacin 5 mg once daily (od) alone (323) or 5 mg od combined with simplified bladder training (320) for 8 weeks. At week 8, patients in both groups could request a dose increase to solifenacin 10 mg od for the remaining 8 weeks of the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in the mean number of micturitions/24 h after 8 weeks. Secondary efficacy measures were the change in micturition frequency and other voiding diary variables at week 16. Patient-reported outcomes were also assessed, including patient Perception of Bladder Condition, Incontinence Quality of Life, and Treatment Satisfaction using a visual analogue scale score; tolerability was also assessed.
                Solifenacin given alone was effective in improving all measures of OAB evaluated in the study. When simplified bladder training was used combined with solifenacin there was a further significant improvement in micturition frequency at week 8, and this difference was maintained through to week 16. The use of simplified bladder training with solifenacin also significantly improved treatment satisfaction at week 16 over the responses to solifenacin given alone. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups at week 16 in urgency, incontinence or other secondary variables measured. The most common adverse event reported was dry mouth in both treatment groups; there was a low rate of discontinuation due to adverse events in the total study group.
                Combined treatment with solifenacin and simplified bladder training was more effective than solifenacin alone in reducing micturition frequency at weeks 8 and 16, and improving treatment satisfaction at week 16 in patients with OAB. Simplified bladder training did not improve on the benefits of solifenacin alone in the symptoms of urgency or incontinence.
                © 2009 THE AUTHORS. JOURNAL COMPILATION © 2009 BJU INTERNATIONAL. To compare the efficacy of a controlled-release (CR) formulation of oxybutynin with that of conventional oxybutynin in patients with detrusor instability or detrusor hyper-reflexia whose symptoms were stabilized on conventional oral oxybutynin tablets.
                The study comprised a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial involving 130 patients drawn from 15 centres in the UK. The study was of 6 weeks' duration, i.e. 2 weeks of screening whilst taking conventional oxybutynin tablets (5 mg twice daily) followed by 4 weeks of double-blind treatment with either CR oxybutynin tablets (10 mg once daily) or conventional oxybutynin tablets (5 mg twice daily). Outcome measures were changes in 24-h frequency and 24-h incontinence episodes recorded throughout the study on diary charts. Adverse events were recorded by patients in their diary charts and serum concentrations of oxybutynin and its active metabolite, N-desethyloxybutynin, were measured at baseline and at completion of the study to detect possible drug accumulation.
                The treatments did not differ significantly in any of the outcome measures. The primary efficacy criterion was the daytime continence at completion of the study; 53% and 58% of patients were continent on CR and conventional oxybutynin treatments, respectively (the 95% confidence interval of the difference in the proportion being - 22% to 13%; P = 0.62). The total number of side-effects experienced by those patients receiving treatment with the CR formulation was 57% of that for patients receiving treatment with conventional oxybutynin. Individual side-effects showed a similar distribution within treatment groups. There was no evidence of the accumulation of oxybutynin or N-desethyloxybutynin during the multiple dosing of CR or conventional oxybutynin tablets.
                The CR and conventional formulations of oxybutynin did not differ in their efficacy, and the CR formulation was associated with fewer side-effects. In addition, CR oxybutynin appeared to maintain therapeutic blood levels over the 24 h dosing interval with no accumulation of oxybutynin or its active metabolite. Once-daily dosing with a CR tablet is seen as convenient for the patient and is expected to result in improved compliance in patients already stabilized on conventional oxybutynin treatment. Oxybutynin has long been used for the treatment of patients with detrusor overactivity and urinary urge incontinence. The short half-life of oxybutynin administered as a conventional tablet formulation or syrup requires 2-3 times daily dosage to be effective. A new controlled release (CR) tablet for once-daily administration has been developed. The efficacy and tolerability of this new controlled release tablet was compared to that of a 5-mg conventional oxybutynin tablet administered twice daily. Seventeen female incontinent patients were studied in a double-dummy crossover trial. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed by using a voiding diary, pad-weighing test, visual-analogue scale (VAS), and questionnaire. Adverse events were recorded spontaneously on a questionnaire by the patients themselves throughout the study. Serum concentrations of oxybutynin and its active metabolite N-desethyloxybutynin were studied after both a single dose and multiple dosage. There was no difference in efficacy between the two formulations. Depending on the parameters tested, the change from baseline values in a positive direction ranged from 15 to 53%. The incidence of adverse events was similar with both formulations. Oxybutynin or its metabolite showed no cumulation during the multiple dosage with a 10-mg CR tablet. The controlled release tablet formulation is as effective and as well-tolerated as the conventional one, but has the advantage of only once-a-day dosage, enhancing treatment compliance. Tolterodine is a potent antimuscarinic agent specifically developed for the treatment of urinary urge incontinence and other symptoms related to the overactive bladder. In order to assess the optimum dosage for use in future clinical studies, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study was performed in 90 patients with detrusor hyperreflexia and symptoms of urinary urgency, frequency, and/or urge incontinence. Urodynamic variables, micturition diary variables, and subjective urinary symptoms were measured before and after 2 weeks' treatment with either placebo or tolterodine 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 mg twice daily (bd). Serum drug concentrations, electrocardiogram recordings, blood pressure, and incidence of adverse events were also assessed. Linear regression analysis showed a significant dose-response relationship for several clinically relevant urodynamic variables, while there was a trend towards an improvement in micturition diary variables and subjective assessment of symptoms with increasing dosages of tolterodine. There were no safety or tolerability concerns regarding any of the dosages of tolterodine investigated, although 2 patients treated with a dosage of 4 mg bd experienced urinary retention that necessitated dosage reduction. The results of this study suggest that tolterodine is well-tolerated and exerts a dose-dependent effect on bladder function in patients with detrusor hyperreflexia. The optimum dosage of tolterodine for use in future studies is 1-2 mg bd. Prospective randomized trial to compare two low starting doses of oxybutynin, using an incremental regimen to assess patient compliance and treatment efficacy in the long-term.
                Women with detrusor overactivity were included. Oxybutynin was randomly prescribed with a starting dose of either 2.5 mg bd or 5 mg nocte. Instructions were given to increase oxybutynin up to 5 mg tds over a period of 6 weeks fortnightly. After two years we re-contacted all the women, using a specific questionnaire to assess the efficacy, acceptability and compliance with these two different regimens. Twenty-two women in each group were calculated to show a 5% difference with a significance of 0.05 and a power of 0.9. The chi2-test was used to compare the two groups and a P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
                Ninety-six women were included; 66 (68.75%) (mean age 57.5 years) responded to our questionnaire. Twenty-seven had a starting dose of 2.5 mg oxybutynin twice a day and 39 of 5 mg nocte. 34.8% complained of side effects. Only 19 (43.2%) out of the 44, not on medication anymore abandoned oxybutynin for adverse reactions. Most of the patients stopped oxybutynin within 4 months. 53.0% reported improvement or cure. 39.4% denied any benefit and 7.6% (none still on oxybutynin) did not answer. The two groups did not differ for duration of treatment, improvement with oxybutynin, maximum dose they reached, the present dose, and the present urinary symptoms.
                This study did not show any advantage in efficacy or compliance with oxybutynin when two different regimens of low starting were used. Two-thirds of patients discontinued the therapy within 4-6 months. Therefore, patients on anticholinergics should be reassessed after 6 months in clinical practice. To determine the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder (OAB).
                This was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial with tolterodine extended release (ER) to assess the efficacy and safety of fesoterodine. Eligible subjects (> or =18 yr) with increased micturition frequency and urgency and/or urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) were randomised to placebo, fesoterodine 4 mg, fesoterodine 8 mg, or tolterodine ER 4 mg for 12 wk. The primary efficacy variable was a change from baseline to week 12 in micturitions per 24 h. Co-primary end points included change from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes per 24 h and Treatment Response ("yes" or "no," based on four-point treatment benefit scale). Secondary efficacy variables included mean volume voided per micturition, continent days per week, and number of urgency episodes.
                At the end of treatment, subjects taking fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg had significant (p<0.05) and clinically relevant improvements versus placebo in the primary, co-primary, and most secondary efficacy variables. Tolterodine ER (active control) also provided significantly greater improvement than placebo for most efficacy variables, confirming the sensitivity of the study design. A more pronounced effect was observed with fesoterodine 8 mg at most end points.
                Both doses of fesoterodine were significantly better than placebo in improving the symptoms of OAB and produced a significantly greater Treatment Response versus placebo. Efficacy was more pronounced with fesoterodine 8 mg compared with the other treatments. Active treatments were well tolerated. Application of physostigmine to the oromucosal surface with the aim of stimulating underlying mucin-producing glands while reducing cholinergic systemic effects might be a strategy for treating dry mouth. Subjects suffering from dry mouth and with hyposalivation participated in a crossover, double-blind, randomized study. A gel containing physostigmine (0.9, 1.8, 3.6, and 7.2 mg) or placebo was applied to the inside of the lips and distributed with the tongue. The feeling of dryness was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) (where a score of 100 = extremely dry) and systemic effects were registered. Based on assessments of efficacy and safety, the dose of 1.8 mg of physostigmine was selected for use in the second part of the study to make objective measurements of saliva volumes. Physostigmine (1.8 mg) produced long-lasting (120 min) relief (evident as a score reduction of 25 on the VAS) in the feeling of dryness. Judging from AUC values related to baseline over 180 min, the improvement for both mouth and lips in response to physostigmine was six times greater than that to placebo. At higher doses of physostigmine, gastrointestinal discomfort predominantly occurred. The volume of saliva collected in response to physostigmine was five times higher over 180 min than that collected in response to placebo. Physostigmine, applied locally, therefore appears to be a promising modality for dry-mouth treatment. The aims of this study were to determine whether oral trospium chloride is noninferior to oxy-butynin for urinary urge incontinence and to evaluate its efficacy, tolerability, and health-related quality of life parameters.
                In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, Phase IIIb trial conducted in Germany, male and female outpatients aged >or=18 years with documented urinary frequency (>or=8 micturitions/24 hours) plus urge incontinence (>or=5 episodes/week) were randomized to receive oral treatment with trospium chloride 15 mg TID or oxybutynin hydrochloride 2.5 mg TID for 12 weeks. Daily doses could be adjusted upward after 4 weeks, to 90 mg of trospium (30 mg TID) and 15 mg of oxybutynin (5 mg TID), respectively, if needed. The absolute reduction in weekly episodes of urinary urge incontinence was evaluated as the primary efficacy variable. Secondary variables included the absolute reduction of micturitions per 24 hours, intensity of urgency, and mean voided volume. Qualitative symptom changes were recorded from the patients' entries in their micturition diaries at baseline, at week 4, and at week 12 of treatment. Subjective treatment outcome was assessed by patient ratings on a visual analog scale (VAS), the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), and the 36-Item Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36); intensity of dry mouth was also recorded on a scale. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed.
                Of the 1658 patients treated, 828 patients (49.9%) received trospium 45 mg/d and 830 patients (50.1%) received oxybutynin 7.5 mg/d. After 4 weeks, daily doses were doubled in 29.2% (242/828) of patients in the trospium chloride group, and in 23.3% (193/830) of patients in the oxybutynin group, until the end of treatment. No clinically relevant differences in demographic characteristics were observed between the treatment groups. Trospium was noninferior to oxybutynin hydrochloride in terms of the reduction in the number of weekly urge incontinence episodes after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment. In the per-protocol population, the median change after 12 weeks was -11.0 in both groups. In the full analysis set, the median change was -10.42 with trospium chloride and -10.00 with oxybutynin (P < 0.001 for the noninferiority hypothesis, for both the per-protocol and the full analysis set calculations). There was also no indication of a difference between groups concerning the observed reductions of daily micturitions and intensity of urgency as well as the increase in micturition volume at the end of 12 weeks. VAS, KHQ, and SF-36 scores were improved to a similar extent in both treatment groups at the end of treatment. Worsening of dry mouth was less common in the trospium group than in the oxybutynin group after 4 and 12 weeks (46.9% vs 63.9% and 51.2% vs 64.4%, respectively; bothtime points, P < 0.001 between groups). Treatment-related AEs were reported by 22.7% (188/828) of the trospium chloride group and 26.5% (220/830) of the oxybutynin group. Dry mouth was the most frequently occurring AE, reported by 4.1% (34/828) of patients in the trospium group and 7.7% (64/830) of the oxybutynin group.
                Our findings indicate that trospium chloride was noninferior to oxybutynin hydrochloride, both with flexible dosing, over 12 weeks in these patients with urinary urge incontinence. Both drugs were generally well tolerated in the population studied, but fewer patients who received trospium reported worsening of dry mouth than those who received oxybutynin. German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Registration Number 4022383.
                Copyright 2009 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved. To compare the efficacy of tolterodine and oxybutynin in the treatment of specific, according to their urodynamic grade of severity, populations with overactive detrusor.
                In this open, randomized, two-way crossover study 128 women with urodynamically confirmed, idiopathic detrusor overactivity were recruited. Patients were categorized in 4 grades of severity groups, according to the characteristics of the first overactive detrusor contraction during filling cystometrogram: high volume-low pressure (grade-group I), high volume-high pressure (grade-group II), low volume-low pressure (grade-group III) and low volume-high pressure (grade-group IV). The primary outcome measure was average volume of voided urine per micturition.
                107 patients successfully completed the study protocol and were included in the analyses: 40 in group IV, 36 in III, 25 in II and 6 in group I. In groups IV and III both oxybutynin and tolterodine significantly increased the average volume of voided urine per micturition but the differences between the drugs were not significant (p > 0.05). In group II neither of the drugs achieved significant changes in the outcome measure (p > 0.05).
                Tolterodine and oxybutynin are clinically equipotent in treating detrusor overactivity in specific severity groups of patients, although urodynamic effects are somewhat different. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover, safety study of darifenacin versus oxybutynin was carried out on 76 patients with overactive bladder (OAB). Adults with OAB received 2 weeks each of darifenacin 15 and 30 mg once daily (q.d.), oxybutynin 5 mg three times daily (t.i.d.) and placebo, in random sequence at 10-day intervals. Darifenacin and oxybutynin significantly reduced incontinence episodes, and the number/severity of urgency episodes (all P<0.05 versus placebo). Improvements in OAB symptoms with darifenacin were dose-dependent. Dry mouth was less common with darifenacin 15 mg than oxybutynin (13% and 36%; P<0.05), while constipation was comparable (10% and 8%, respectively). Corresponding rates for darifenacin 30 mg were 34% and 21%, respectively. Patients only reported blurred vision or dizziness with oxybutynin (3% and 2%, respectively). Darifenacin (15 mg q.d.) provides comparable efficacy with improved tolerability versus oxybutynin (5 mg t.i.d.) in the treatment of patients with OAB. We evaluated the efficacy, patient acceptability and side effect profile of tolterodine, a new antimuscarinic agent for treating bladder overactivity.
                In our randomized, placebo controlled, parallel group study 123, 129 and 64 patients 18 years old or older with proved detrusor overactivity (idiopathic detrusor instability or detrusor hyperreflexia) were randomized to receive 1 or 2 mg. tolterodine, or placebo, respectively, twice daily for 12 weeks. Main outcome measures were number of voids per 24 hours, urine volume per void and episodes of urge incontinence per 24 hours on a frequency-volume chart with detailed recording of side effects.
                After 12 weeks of treatment mean number of voids per 24 hours plus or minus standard deviation decreased from 11.2 +/- 3.1 to 9.0 +/- 2.6 with the 2 mg. dosage (p = 0.0045 versus placebo). At this dose mean urine volume per void increased from 155 +/- 52 to 190 +/- 70 ml. (p <0.0001 versus placebo), while mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours decreased from 3.6 +/- 4.0 to 1.8 +/- 3.1 (p = 0.19 versus placebo). Similar efficacy was observed in patients receiving the 1 mg. dose. Severe dry mouth was reported by only 2, 1 and 2% of patients given the 1 and 2 mg. dose, and placebo, respectively. There was no clinical or electrocardiographic evidence of significant cardiac adverse events.
                Tolterodine administration resulted in a significant decrease in the frequency of voiding and improved voided volume but it was seldom associated with troublesome or severe side effects. A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial was designed to assess the safety, efficacy, and duration of the bronchodilation resulting from the addition of 500 micrograms of ipratropium bromide (Atrovent; Boehringer Ingelheim, CT) inhalation solution to standard small volume nebulizer treatments with 2.5 mg albuterol inhalation solution. A total of 195 patients (63% men, average age 64 years) with > 10 pack-year smoking histories and stable, moderate-to- severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] 1.02 liter, 38.8% predicted) from eight university-affiliated chest clinics in seven U.S. cities were enrolled into the study. Asthma, rhinitis, and eosinophilia were exclusions, as was daily use of > 10 mg of prednisone (or 20 mg on alternate days). There was a 2-week stabilization period during which the patients were instructed in the use of the small volume nebulizers, which they used three times daily with albuterol alone. They were asked to keep daily logs of peak flow rates, pulmonary symptoms, and additional medication usage. On their test day 1 the subjects came to the pulmonary function laboratory having been off theophylline for 24 hours and beta 2-agonists for 12 hours and performed a baseline spirometry. They then received their morning small volume nebulizer treatment of albuterol to which was added either 500 micrograms if ipratropium bromide or a saline placebo. Spirometry was repeated at 15, 30, and 60 minutes, and then hourly for 8 hours. Subjects then took home a 2-week supply of albuterol and test drug for thrice daily use in their small volume nebulizer. They were evaluated for pulmonary symptoms and adverse effects every 14 days. The 8-hour spirometry was repeated on test day 43 and finally on test day 85. Primary data evaluated were the peak increase in FEV1 and the area between the FEV1 baseline value and the 8-hour FEV1 curve. Similar calculations were made for forced vital capacity (FVC) and 25-75% forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75%). On test day 1 the peak increase in FEV1 for the ipratropium bromide + albuterol subjects was 26% greater than those on placebo + albuterol (p < 0.003). The area under the 8-hour FEV1 curve was 64% greater in those given ipratropium bromide on test day 1 (p < 0.0002). Similar increases were seen in FVC and FEF25-75%. The peak improvements in FEV1 and FVC with the addition of ipratropium bromide to albuterol were maintained on test days 43 and 85. Considering the safety and efficacy profiles of this combination, the data would suggest that ipratropium bromide inhalation solution should be considered first-line therapy for those patients with COPD requiring small volume nebulizer treatments. Unstable bladder is a frequent syndrome in women and is due in the most part because of detrusor involuntary contractions, mainly due to detrusor denervation, which produces voiding hypersensitivity and loss of cortical inhibition control, clinical manifestations are: frequency, nicturia, urgency and urge incontinence. Historically the most effective treatment has been muscular relaxing agents and anticholinergic agents. We present a prospective, double blind, cross, placebo control study to evaluate efficacy and tolerance of oxybutynin in women with unstable bladder. We included 44 adult women with unstable bladder, 22 unitially received oxybutynin 5 mg t.i.d. and 22 placebo 5 mg t.i.d. aleatory in both groups through 6 weeks, later wash-out period was performed and those women in which initially received oxybutynin were administered placebo and those women in which initially received placebo, were administered oxybutynin, for another six weeks. Five patients which initiated the study with oxybutynin abandoned the study, 2 of them for intolerance and 3 for unknown causes. Two women in which initially received placebo abandoned follow-up too. A total of 74 subjects (37 for each branch of study) had an age average of 51.7. Symptoms scoring decreased from 13 to 11 and 6 points with placebo and oxybutynin respectively (p = 0.001). The analog visual scale of symptoms decreased from 77% to 62.5% and 40% with placebo and oxybutynin respectively (p = 0.003). The overall rate of improvement evaluated through symptoms scoring was from 27% with placebo and 72.9% with oxybutynin (p = 0.000) and evaluated through analog visual scale of symptoms was from 40% with placebo and 78.3% with oxybutynin (p = 0.002). The vesical volume at first voiding sensation increased from 129 ml to 134 ml and 187 ml with placebo and oxybutynin respectively (p = 0.021) and the maximum cystometric capacity increased from 231 ml to 236 ml and 301 ml with placebo and oxybutynin respectively. The most frequent adverse effect in both groups was mouth dryness and it presented in 7 (19%) and 34 (91%) patients with placebo and oxybutynin respectively (p = 0.000). Only 5 of 44 patients (11.3%) with oxybutynin and 2 of 44 patients (4.4%) with placebo abandoned follow up (p = 0.14). We concluded that oxybutynin improve significantly the unstable bladder symptoms in women, possibly by increasing functional bladder capacity and decreasing voiding sensitivity, with good tolerance of mouth dryness in the majority of patients. About 15% to 20% of patients with detrusor hyperreflexia do not benefit from oral oxybutynin regimens, frequently because of unpleasant side effects. Several reports indicate that intravesical oxybutynin is effective in many of these patients but there are some who still fail to respond.
                A select group of 10 adults with detrusor hyperreflexia unresponsive to standard oral and intravesical oxybutynin regimens were treated at weekly intervals with 5 mg. oxybutynin orally, or 5 mg. oxybutynin in 100 ml. intravesically for 60 minutes of passive diffusion and for 30 minutes with 5 mA. electrical current. Each treatment (plus oral placebo and 2 intravesical controls) was associated with an 8-hour, full urodynamic monitoring session, and periodic blood and bladder content sampling.
                There was no significant objective improvement with oral or intravesical passive diffusion oxybutynin. Conversely there was significant improvement in 5 of 6 objective urodynamic measurements with intravesical electromotive oxybutynin. Plasma profiles were a single peak and decay following oral oxybutynin and 2 distinct peaks with intravesical passive diffusion and electromotive oxybutynin. Area under the curve for intravesical passive diffusion were 709 ng. per 8 hours versus oral 1,485 (p <0.05) versus intravesical electromotive 2,781 (p <0.001). Bladder content samples confirmed oxybutynin absorption. Oral oxybutynin caused anticholinergic side effects in 7 of 10 patients. There were no side effects with intravesical passive diffusion or electromotive administrations.
                Accelerated intravesical administration results in greater bioavailability and increased objective benefits without side effects in previously unresponsive patients compared with oral and intravesical passive diffusion oxybutynin administration. To compare trospium chloride (TCl), a quaternary ammonium derivative with atropine-like effects and predominantly antispasmodic activity, with oxybutynin (Oxy) in terms of efficacy and adverse effects.
                In a randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial, 95 patients with spinal cord injuries and detrusor hyper-reflexia were studied. Treatment consisted of three doses per day over a 2 week period, with either Oxy (5 mg three times daily) or with TCl (20 mg twice daily) with an additional placebo at midday. The results were evaluated with regard to changes in objective (urodynamic) data and subjective symptoms as well as the incidence/severity of adverse effects.
                With both drugs there was a significant increase in maximum bladder capacity, a significant decrease in maximum voiding detrusor pressure and a significant increase in compliance and residual urine; there were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups. The percentage of patients who reported severe dryness of the mouth was considerably lower (4%) in those receiving TCl 2 x 20 mg/day than in those receiving Oxy (23%) 3 x 5 mg/day. Withdrawal from treatment was also less frequent in those receiving TCl (6%) than in those receiving Oxy (16%).
                Trospium chloride and oxybutynin, judged in terms of objective urodynamic parameters, are of substantially equal value as parasympathetic antagonists. However, assessment of tolerance in terms of adverse drug effects showed that TCl had certain advantages. Xerostomia is a subjective sensation of mouth dryness that may frequently occur in older patients.
                To compare the clinical efficacy and acceptability of a new oxygenated glycerol triester (OGT) oral spray taken five times daily with that of a commercially available saliva substitute Saliveze in the treatment of xerostomia.
                Forty-one institutionalised patients (28 women, 13 men; mean age 84 +/- 7 years) were randomly assigned to receive either OGT or Saliveze in a 2-week, randomised, parallel-group study. Clinical assessment of xerostomia included evaluation of mouth dryness using a self-rated, 10cm long visual analogue scale (VAS), objective assessment of oral tissue condition using a four-point ordinal scale and subjective assessment of symptoms of xerostomia using dichotomous responses to a questionnaire. The primary endpoint was the day (D) 14 patient-based mouth dryness score measured on a self-rated VAS.
                At D14, OGT resulted in significantly greater efficacy with respect to mouth dryness (mean between-treatment difference 2.1 +/- 0.1, 95% CI 1.9, 2.3; p = 0.001), swallowing difficulty (1.8 +/- 0.3, 95% CI 1.5, 2.1; p = 0.001), speech difficulty (1.1 +/- 0.2, 95% CI 1.0, 2.4; p = 0.04) and overall sensation of symptom relief (2.7 +/- 1.2, 95% CI 1.9, 3.8; p = 0.001). Objective assessment of oral tissues also showed significantly better improvement with OGT spray with respect to dryness (p = 0.01), stickiness (p = 0.005) and dullness (p = 0.001) of oral mucosa; severity of mucositis (p = 0.01); and thickening of the tongue (p = 0.03). A significant difference in taste acceptability was also noted in favour of OGT (1.4 +/- 0.6, 95% CI 1.2, 1.9; p = 0.04).
                OGT lubricant oral spray was superior to Saliveze in improving xerostomia and oral tissue condition in older institutionalised patients. Patients attending the emergency room with acute asthma, participating in a study comparing salbutamol (albuterol in the United States) via a dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler) with pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), were included in this 1-week follow-up study with the aim of assessing whether inhaled budesonide via Turbuhaler may be an alternative to prednisolone tablets after an acute asthma attack. Eighty-one patients with a mean age of 38 years and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) of 64% predicted normal value after treatment with salbutamol were randomized in this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. The doses given were budesonide 1600 microg b.i.d. or prednisolone in daily doses from 40 mg (day 1) decreased to 5 mg (day 7). FEV1 was recorded before and after the 7-day treatments and peak expiratory flow (PEF) morning and evening, clinical symptoms (visual analogue scale 0-100), and doses of rescue medication (terbutaline Turbuhaler 0.25 mg/dose) were recorded daily. The mean increase in FEV1 from baseline to day 7 was 17.3% in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and 17.6% in the prednisolone group. Mean values of morning PEF increased from day 1 to day 7 by 67 L/min in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and by 57 L/min in the prednisolone group (not significant). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in clinical symptoms and in the number of doses of rescue medication. Because of disease deterioration, five patients in the Turbuhaler group and three in the prednisolone group needed additional symptomatic as well as corticosteroid treatment. Inhaled budesonide in high doses may be a substitute for oral therapy as follow-up treatment after an acute asthma attack. This parallel-group study compared the safety and efficacy of controlled-release albuterol versus sustained-release theophylline, both administered every 12 hours. One hundred twenty-four adolescent and adult patients with asthma and with chronic reversible obstructive airway disease were studied. All patients qualified with an FEV1 less than or equal to 80% of predicted (not receiving treatment) and greater than or equal to 15% reversibility in FEV1 or greater than or equal to 25% reversibility in FEF25-75% after inhaled isoproterenol. All patients were known to be able to take theophylline without unacceptable adverse effects. Theophylline was titrated for patients to receive, unblinded, theophylline serum concentrations of 10 to 20 micrograms/ml. With subsequent randomization, 62 patients continued to receive theophylline and 62 patients started taking albuterol in the 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy portion of the study. Pulmonary function was measured during a pretreatment visit (unmedicated) and serial assessment was made starting just before the morning dose and continuing for 12 hours after the dose at the end of 1, 6, and 12 weeks of treatment. Both treatment groups exhibited statistically significant increases in FEV1 from the pretreatment visit to all times of observation at weeks 1, 6, and 12. The increases in FEV1 were not significantly different between albuterol and theophylline administration. There was no evidence of tolerance to the bronchodilatory effect during 12 weeks in either treatment group. Only one patient in the study stopped treatment because of an adverse effect. This patient had tremor during albuterol administration. All other adverse events were tolerated or resolved during treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Daily inhaled glucocorticoids are recommended for young children at risk for asthma exacerbations, as indicated by a positive value on the modified asthma predictive index (API) and an exacerbation in the preceding year, but concern remains about daily adherence and effects on growth. We compared daily therapy with intermittent therapy.
                We studied 278 children between the ages of 12 and 53 months who had positive values on the modified API, recurrent wheezing episodes, and at least one exacerbation in the previous year but a low degree of impairment. Children were randomly assigned to receive a budesonide inhalation suspension for 1 year as either an intermittent high-dose regimen (1 mg twice daily for 7 days, starting early during a predefined respiratory tract illness) or a daily low-dose regimen (0.5 mg nightly) with corresponding placebos. The primary outcome was the frequency of exacerbations requiring oral glucocorticoid therapy.
                The daily regimen of budesonide did not differ significantly from the intermittent regimen with respect to the frequency of exacerbations, with a rate per patient-year for the daily regimen of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.22) versus a rate of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.20) for the intermittent regimen (relative rate in the intermittent-regimen group, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.35; P=0.60). There were also no significant between-group differences in several other measures of asthma severity, including the time to the first exacerbation, or adverse events. The mean exposure to budesonide was 104 mg less with the intermittent regimen than with the daily regimen.
                A daily low-dose regimen of budesonide was not superior to an intermittent high-dose regimen in reducing asthma exacerbations. Daily administration led to greater exposure to the drug at 1 year. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; MIST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00675584.). Currently available inhaled bronchodilators used as therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) necessitate multiple daily dosing. The present study evaluates the long-term safety and efficacy of tiotropium, a new once-daily anticholinergic in COPD. Patients with stable COPD (age 65.2+/-8.7 yrs (mean+/-SD), n=921) were enrolled in two identical randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 1-yr studies. Patients inhaled tiotropium 18 microg or placebo (mean screening forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.01 versus 0.99 L, 39.1 and 38.1% of the predicted value) once daily as a dry powder. The primary spirometric outcome was trough FEV1 (i.e. FEV1 prior to dosing). Changes in dyspnoea were measured using the Transition Dyspnea Index, and health status with the disease-specific St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire and the generic Short Form 36. Medication use and adverse events were recorded. Tiotropium provided significantly superior bronchodilation relative to placebo for trough FEV1 response (approximately 12% over baseline) (p<0.01) and mean response during the 3 h following dosing (approximately 22% over baseline) (p<0.001) over the 12-month period. Tiotropium recipients showed less dyspnoea (p<0.001), superior health status scores, and fewer COPD exacerbations and hospitalizations (p<0.05). Adverse events were comparable with placebo, except for dry mouth incidence (tiotropium 16.0% versus placebo 2.7%, p<0.05). Tiotropium is an effective, once-daily bronchodilator that reduces dyspnoea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation frequency and improves health status. This suggests that tiotropium will make an important contribution to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease therapy. There are no data currently available on the correct schedule for the initiation of treatment with nebulized suspension of budesonide in children with recurrent wheezing episodes. We compared the efficacy and safety of starting with a high dose followed by a stepwise decrease to a continuous low dose.
                In a double-blind design, 42 children aged 6 months to 3 years were randomly allocated to receive either a high starting dose of 1 mg budesonide twice daily followed by a stepwise decrease of 25% every second day for 1 week (group A) or a low dose of 0.25 mg twice daily for 1 week (group B). Efficacy was assessed with daily symptom scores and the systemic effect of the corticosteroids with the adrenocorticotropic hormone test.
                The two groups were comparable for all parameters evaluated. During the first week of treatment, there was a significant decrease in asthmatic symptomatology only in group A: a 59% decrease for wheezing (p = 0.0001), 39% for diurnal cough (p = 0.036), and 39% for nocturnal cough (p = 0.04). Mean time to clinical response was 3.0 days in group A and 5.7 days in group B (p = 0.02). This early improvement was sustained for the rest of the follow-up period. The high dose starting schedule was not associated with any change in serum cortisol level.
                The administration of nebulized suspension of budesonide at a high starting dose schedule followed by a rapid (1 week) stepwise decrease yields a significant early improvement in asthma symptoms and causes no change in serum cortisol levels. In this phase 3 trial we assessed the efficacy of solifenacin 5 mg and 10 mg daily in patients with symptoms related to overactive bladder. In addition, we assessed the safety and acceptability of solifenacin.
                The study was a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Patients were randomized to 12-week once daily treatment with solifenacin 5 mg, solifenacin 10 mg or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was changed from baseline to study end point in mean number of micturitions per 24 hours. Secondary efficacy variables included changes from baseline in mean number of urgency, nocturia and incontinence episodes per 24 hours, and mean volume voided per micturition.
                Compared with changes obtained with placebo (-1.59), micturitions per 24 hours were statistically significantly decreased with solifenacin 5 mg (-2.37, p = 0.0018) and solifenacin 10 mg (-2.81, p = 0.0001). A statistically significant decrease was observed in the number of incontinence episodes with both solifenacin doses (5 mg, p = 0.002 and 10 mg, p = 0.016). This effect was also seen for episodes of urge incontinence (5 mg, p = 0.014 and 10 mg, p = 0.042). Of patients reporting incontinence at baseline, fully 50% achieved continence after treatment with solifenacin. Episodes of nocturia were statistically significantly decreased in patients treated with solifenacin 10 mg (-0.71, -38.5%) versus placebo (-0.52, -16.4%, p = 0.036). Episodes of urgency were statistically significantly reduced with solifenacin 5 mg (-2.84, -51%, p = 0.003) and solifenacin 10 mg (-2.90, -52%, p = 0.002). Mean volume voided per micturition was statistically significantly increased with both solifenacin doses (p = 0.0001). Treatment with solifenacin was well tolerated. Dry mouth, mostly mild in severity, was reported in 7.7% of patients receiving solifenacin 5 mg and 23% receiving solifenacin 10 mg (vs 2.3% with placebo).
                In this study treatment with solifenacin 5 mg and 10 mg once daily significantly improved all the major symptoms of overactive bladder including frequency, urgency and incontinence. Solifenacin 10 mg also decreased the frequency of nocturia. Solifenacin therapy was associated with a favorable tolerability profile and a low incidence of dry mouth, especially at the 5 mg starting dose. Combination bronchodilator therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is available widely throughout the world except in North America. Previous studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the advantages of combining anticholinergic therapy with sympathomimetic therapy in COPD. We report the results of a 12-week prospective, double-blind, parallel-group evaluation of the use of the following: albuterol, a beta-adrenergic agent; ipratropium, an anticholinergic agent; or a combination of the two, administered by metered-dose inhaler to patients with moderately severe stable COPD. Following baseline studies, 534 patients were given one of the three test bronchodilator preparations to be used at home four times daily in addition to oral theophylline and corticosteroids as required. The doses of the latter two drugs were kept stable. Subjects were tested on days 1, 29, 57, and 85. Analysis of 1-s forced expiratory volume (FEV1) curves on those test days indicated that the combination was superior to either single agent alone in peak effect, in the effect during the first 4 h after dosing, and in the total area under the curve of the FEV1 response. The mean peak percent increases in FEV1 over baseline on the four test days were 31 to 33 percent for the combination, 24 to 25 percent for ipratropium, and 24 to 27 percent for albuterol. The differences between the combination and its components were statistically significant on all test days. The AUC0-4 means for the combination were 21 to 44 percent greater than the ipratropium means and 30 to 46 percent greater than the albuterol means. Similar changes were noted in the forced vital capacity curves. Symptom scores did not change over time and did not differ among the treatment groups. We conclude that the combination of ipratropium and albuterol, when given by metered-dose inhaler to patients with COPD, is more effective than either of the two agents alone. The advantage of the combination is apparent primarily during the first 4 h after administration. The availability of combination therapy by metered-dose inhaler should help to improve patient compliance. Xerostomia is a subjective sensation of mouth dryness often occurring as an unwanted effect of psychotropic drugs.
                The clinical efficacy and acceptability of a new oxygenated glycerol triester (OGT) oral spray (1 or 2 sprays up to 4 times daily) in the treatment of xerostomia was compared with those of a commercially available artificial saliva substitute (ASS [Saliveze]) in a 2-week, open-labeled, randomized, parallel-group study. Clinical assessment of xerostomia included evaluation of mouth dryness by means of a 10-cm-long visual analog scale, objective blinded assessment of the oral tissue condition by a dental hygienist by means of a 4-point ordinal scale, and subjective patient-based assessment of dry mouth symptoms by means of dichotomous responses to a questionnaire. [Day 14 - baseline] patient-based mouth dryness score was the primary end point.
                Seventy-four patients (41 women and 33 men, 44 +/- 15 years) undergoing long-term psychotropic drug treatment were consecutively enrolled. At day 14, OGT resulted in better efficacy than ASS in mouth dryness score (mean difference, 1.2 +/- 0.4; P = 0.006), speech difficulties (mean difference, 1.2 +/- 0.4; P = 0.005), taste (mean difference, 1.1 +/- 0.4; P = 0.02), and overall mouth condition (mean difference, 1.4 +/- 0.9; P = 0.005). Taste of OGT was better than that of ASS (mean difference, 1.4 +/- 0.6; P = 0.04), as was OGT acceptability (mean difference, 1.4 +/- 0.9; P = 0.005).
                Oxygenated glycerol triester lubricant oral spray was superior to a commercially available ASS in improving xerostomia and overall condition of the oral tissue. In a controlled, randomised, prospective, clinical study, the effect of prolactin suppression and clinical course of the lactation suppressors Bromocriptine and Metergoline were investigated. During 7 months 150 patients were studied. 81 of those patients, who did not nurse, were treated by Bromocriptine (primary lactation suppression: n = 62, secondary suppression: n = 19) and 69 of the patients were treated by Metergoline (primary suppression: n = 54, secondary suppression: n = 15). The drugs were administrated orally to all subjects, dosed 2 x 2.5 mg/d of Bromocriptine for 14 days and 3 x 4 mg/d of Metergoline for 10 days, starting in average after 13 hours. Puerperal suppression of prolactine were compared with randomised breast feeding subjects (n = 30). In Bromocriptine treated women the average plasma prolactin level decreased from 78.4 +/- 22 ng/ml to 17.0 +/- 3.3 ng/ml during five days of treatment. In Metergoline treated women the plasma prolactin level decreased from 129.7 +/- 15.1 ng/ml to 56.9 +/- 10.0 ng/ml during the first days of treatment. Prolactin level of breast feeding subjects decreased from 233.6 +/- 21.4 ng/ml to 185.8 +/- 23.7 ng/ml during the same period (p < 0.05). There is no statistical significancy of clinical difference of both drugs, but a statistical trend was seen. With Bromocriptine treated women were suppressed efficiently in 71 of 81 cases, 10 refused. Refusals were divided in two quality levels, level I with subjects with moderate complaints and little puerperal lactation, level II with subjects with considerable complaints including strong puerperal lactation. With Metergoline suppressed women, treatment was efficiently in 51 of 69 cases, but refusals of level I were observed in 11 cases and refusals of level II were observed in 7 cases. The results show that Bromocriptine and Metergoline are effective on suppression of lactation. Under the current drug dose of Metergoline an advantage of Bromocriptine were observed. Only further studies could investigate, whether an adaptation of drug dose would improve the clinical efficiency of Metergoline.
Where the prescribing choice is between oral immediate release oxybutynin or tolterodine, tolterodine might be preferred for reduced risk of dry mouth. With tolterodine, 2 mg twice daily is the usual starting dose but a 1 mg twice daily dose might be equally effective, with less risk of dry mouth. If extended release preparations of oxybutynin or tolterodine are available, these might be preferred to immediate release preparations because there is less risk of dry mouth.
Between solifenacin and immediate release tolterodine, solifenacin might be preferred for better efficacy and less risk of dry mouth. Solifenacin 5 mg once daily is the usual starting dose, which could be increased to 10 mg once daily for better efficacy but with increased risk of dry mouth.
Between fesoterodine and extended release tolterodine, fesoterodine might be preferred for superior efficacy but has a higher risk of withdrawal due to adverse events and higher risk of dry mouth.There is little or no evidence available about quality of life, costs, or long-term outcomes in these studies. There were insufficient data from trials of other anticholinergic drugs to draw any conclusions.