Short-term regular beta 2-adrenergic agonists treatment is safe in mild asthmatics taking low doses of inhaled steroids. Effect of feedback letters to physicians and pharmacists on the appropriate use of medication in the treatment of asthma. Is the increase in bronchial responsiveness or FEV1 shortly after cessation of beta2-agonists reflecting a real deterioration of the disease in allergic asthmatic patients? A comparison between short-acting and long-acting beta2-agonists. Effects of the long acting beta agonist formoterol on asthma control in asthmatic patients using inhaled corticosteroids. The Netherlands and Canadian Formoterol Study Investigators. Asthma control during and after cessation of regular beta 2-agonist treatment. Beta2-agonist tolerance and exercise-induced bronchospasm. Inhaling beta(2)-agonist with heliox-driven in bronchial asthma. Use of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with mild asthma. Effects of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate on beta 2-receptor function in the airways and adrenal responsiveness in bronchial asthma. Regular inhaled salbutamol and airway responsiveness to allergen. Long-acting beta2-agonist monotherapy vs continued therapy with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with persistent asthma: a randomized controlled trial. Changes in methacholine induced bronchoconstriction with the long acting beta 2 agonist salmeterol in mild to moderate asthmatic patients. Poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: can using a single inhaler containing budesonide and formoterol help? Methodological aspects on clinical trials with inhaled corticosteroids: results of two comparisons between two steroid aerosols in patients with asthma. Inhaled beta-agonists improve lung function but not maximal exercise capacity in cystic fibrosis. Effect of inhaled corticosteroids on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with mild asthma. The relationship among inspiratory muscle strength, the perception of dyspnea and inhaled beta2-agonist use in patients with asthma. Interaction of inhaled beta 2 agonist and inhaled corticosteroid on airway responsiveness to allergen and methacholine. Buteyko breathing techniques in asthma: a blinded randomised controlled trial. Long-term effects of formoterol and salbutamol on bronchial hyperreactivity and beta-adrenoceptor density on lymphocytes in children with bronchial asthma. Management of acute asthma in children using metered dose inhaler and small volume nebulizer. Exhaled nitric oxide in the management of childhood asthma: a prospective 6-months study. An inhaled glucocorticoid does not prevent tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of a long-acting inhaled beta 2-agonist. Randomised trial of an inhaled beta2 agonist, inhaled corticosteroid and their combination in the treatment of asthma. Efficacy of chlorofluorocarbon-free beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms day-1 delivered as an extrafine aerosol in adults with moderate asthma. Long-term effects of a long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, salmeterol, on airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with mild asthma. Tolerance to the nonbronchodilator effects of inhaled beta 2-agonists in asthma. A comparative trial of slow-release aminophylline, salbutamol and a half dose combination in the prevention of childhood asthma. Comparison of second controller medications in addition to inhaled corticosteroid in patients with moderate asthma. Clinical efficacy of low-dose inhaled budesonide once or twice daily in children with mild asthma not previously treated with steroids. An inhaled steroid improves markers of airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma. Effects of treatment with formoterol on bronchoprotection against methacholine. Comparison of dose-response effects of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide in the management of asthma. Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate 44 microg/salmeterol 21 microg administered in a hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler as an initial asthma maintenance treatment. Cost effectiveness of leukotriene receptor antagonists versus long-acting beta-2 agonists as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: a pragmatic trial. Betamethasone valerate inhalation and exercise-induced asthma in adults. Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate via Diskus once daily versus fluticasone propionate twice daily in patients with mild asthma not previously receiving maintenance corticosteroids. Pulmicort Turbohaler once daily as initial prophylactic therapy for asthma.
Regular treatment with beta 2-adrenergic agonists is controversial in bronchial asthma. To investigate whether beta 2-adrenergic agonists can be used safely if associated with low doses of inhaled steroids, for a short period, without a deterioration of asthma control, we have examined 24 mild asthmatics. In a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 1 week of run-in and run-out period framed 3 weeks of treatment. All patients received inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP 250 micrograms t.i.d.); after 1 week, 12 patients inhaled 400 micrograms of broxaterol and 12 patients received placebo t.i.d. FVC, FEV1, PD20-FEV1 methacholine, morning and evening PEF, and PEF amplitude % mean were measured before, during, and after treatment. No significant changes were noted in patients receiving inhaled broxaterol. There were no differences in symptoms and the use of rescue medication (salbutamol spray). We conclude that short-term regular treatment with beta 2-adrenergic agonists is not associated with a deterioration in asthma control in mild asthmatics inhaling low doses of steroids. Suboptimal medication treatment of asthma has been reported. More specifically, short-acting beta 2-agonists are overused, while inhaled corticosteroids are underused. This can be related in part to poor adherence by patients to the prescribed regimen and to professionals' failure to comply with practice guidelines. Feedback seems to have an effect on professional practices related to medication use.
                To assess the impact of feedback letters to physicians and pharmacists on their patients' appropriate use of asthma medication.
                Two randomized trials were set up in the province of Quebec, Canada: one with physicians and another with pharmacists. A sample of voluntary physicians and pharmacists was randomly assigned to either the experimental group or to the control group. Those in the experimental groups received three consecutive feedback letters over a 9-month period summarizing the asthma medications acquired by their patients over the preceding year. The feedback focused on short-acting beta 2-agonists, long-acting beta 2-agonists and antileukotrienes and provided information on compliance with five appropriate-use criteria. Pharmacists received aggregate profiles and individual profiles with patients' names, while most physicians received aggregate profiles for all their eligible patients. Each mailing also included a pamphlet that summarized practice guidelines on asthma treatment.
                Seventy-one physicians and 60 pharmacists participated in the study. Physicians who received the feedback letters did not differ from those in the control group in terms of their proportion of prescriptions compliant with the criteria, either before the feedback or after it (p > 0.05). The before-after difference was also similar between groups. The same was true for pharmacists. However, although the before-after difference for criteria 1 (frequency of use of short-acting beta 2-agonists) and 2 (frequency of use of long-acting beta 2-agonists) did not reach the usual statistical significance threshold of 0.05, the p value was under 0.10.
                As designed in this study, feedback provided to physicians did not improve the appropriate use of asthma medication. However, feedback to pharmacists is promising, especially when including patients' names so that pharmacists can intervene more specifically. Regular use of beta2-agonists might result in increased bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) and decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1). It has been suggested that these possible detrimental effects are not a real deterioration of the disease, but that it might be only a transient (rebound) effect shortly after discontinuing this regular use. Moreover, these effects are thought to occur especially during short-acting and not during long-acting beta2-agonists use. The aim of this study was to invest gate whether a rebound effect (a pharmacological deterioration effect diminishing after several hours) in FEV1 and PC20 (concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 with regard to baseline) occurred after cessation of regular use of beta2-agonists, and whether this occurred both after short-acting and long-acting beta2-agonists. Allergic asthmatic patients (n = 134) were randomly allocated to the use of a short-acting (salbutamol), a long-acting beta2-agonist (formoterol) or placebo for 12 weeks (double-blind, double-dummy). No other asthma medication was allowed, including inhaled corticosteroids. At the start and every 4 weeks later FEV and PC20 were measured, each time at least 12 h after the last doses of study medication, which is in the possible rebound period. To investigate whether a (transient) rebound effect occurred, parameters were additionally measured at least 72 h later after discontinuation of the study medication. After 12 weeks of short-acting beta2-agonist use, a drop was seen in FEV1 from 85.6 (+/- 2.21)% predicted to 78.8 (+/- 2.9)% predicted, measured 15 h (median) after the last doses of medication. This was significantly different compared to placebo. When measured 168 h (median) later FEV1 recovered to 85.5 (+/- 2.4)% predicted, comparable to baseline. PC20 decreased with -1.17 (+/- 0.44) doubling dose after 12 weeks of short-acting beta2-agonist use, measured 15 h after the last doses of medication, which was significantly different compared to placebo. However, 168 h later PC20 recovered slightly with +0.55 (+/- 0.34) doubling dose, but this value was still lower compared to placebo. In contrast, during long-acting beta2-agonist and placebo use no significant changes were seen. In conclusion, the use of short-acting beta2-agonists resulted in a transient (rebound) effect in FEV while the effects on PC20 may point to a real deterioration of the disease. Long-acting beta2-agonist and placebo use showed no changes. We conclude that a mono-therapy of short-acting and not of long-acting beta2-agonists might have deleterious effects in asthma. The long acting beta 2 agonist formoterol has proved to be an effective bronchodilator with a prolonged action of 12-14 hours. However, the precise role of formoterol in the maintenance treatment of asthma is still under debate. A study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with formoterol for six months in subjects with asthma.
                In a multicentre double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study 239 subjects with mild to moderate asthma were randomly assigned to treatment with either inhaled formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily (n = 125) or placebo (n = 114) during eight months. The study consisted of a four week run in period, a 24 week treatment period, and a four week washout period. All subjects were using regular inhaled corticosteroids (100-3200 micrograms daily) but were still needing at least five inhalations of short acting beta 2 agonist per week for symptom relief. The study was performed in 10 outpatient clinics in Canada, and five outpatient clinics and one coordinating centre for 44 Dutch general practitioners in The Netherlands. Twice daily self-reported peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements, symptom scores, and rescue beta 2 agonist use during the last 28 treatment days compared with baseline values were used as main outcome measures. Spirometric values were measured at entry, at the start of treatment, after four, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, and after four weeks washout.
                One hundred and twenty five subjects received formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily via Turbohaler and 114 received placebo. Baseline FEV1 was 67.1% predicted and mean bronchodilator reversibility was 26%. The mean total asthma symptom score was 3.6 (maximum possible 21). A significant decrease in symptoms in favour of formoterol (difference from placebo -0.64, 95% CI -0.04 to -1.23, p = 0.04) was observed. Compared with placebo, morning PEF increased (difference from placebo 28 l/min, 95% CI 18.3 to 37.7, p = 0.0001) and the use of short acting beta 1 agonists decreased (daytime difference from placebo -1.1 inhalation, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.7, p = 0.0001) in the formoterol group. PEF returned to baseline following discontinuation of formoterol, as did asthma symptom scores. Thirty three patients treated with formoterol and 32 treated with placebo required treatment with prednisolone during the study (58 and 55 courses, respectively).
                Adding formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily by Turbohaler to inhaled corticosteroids was effective in improving symptom scores and morning PEF, and decreasing the use of rescue beta 2 agonists. There was no apparent loss of asthma control during 24 weeks of treatment with formoterol. It has been suggested that regular treatment with high doses of beta 2-agonists might result in poorer control of asthma and increased bronchial responsiveness. We have examined change in FEV1 (delta FEV1), bronchial reactivity, peak expiratory flow (PEF), and symptoms during and after 3 wk of regular treatment with a relatively low dose of albuterol and broxaterol, a new beta 2-agonist. Eleven subjects 18 to 50 yr of age with mild asthma inhaled albuterol (200 micrograms), broxaterol (400 micrograms), or placebo three times a day for 3 wk with a 2- to 4-wk run-in/washout period between treatments. Ipratropium bromide was allowed for symptomatic relief. The PD20 (dose of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1) was measured before and 11, 35, and 59 h after cessation of treatment and a bronchodilator dose-response study before and 83 h after cessation of treatment. Change from baseline after albuterol and broxaterol are compared with change after placebo. Diurnal change in PEF (amplitude % mean) increased during treatment with albuterol by 6.5% (95% CI, 1.7-12.3; p < 0.02) mainly because of a fall in morning PEF. Cessation of treatment with both beta 2-agonists was associated with a fall in FEV1 and PD20 compared with placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The effect of regular inhaled beta-agonist on the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction was studied. Eight subjects with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction took 1 week each of salbutamol 200 microg qid or placebo in a random-order, double-blind, crossover study. They then withheld this treatment for 8 hours before performing a dry-air, sub-maximal exercise challenge at a work-rate previously shown to induce a 15% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Five minutes after exercise, they inhaled salbutamol 100, 100, and 200 microg at 5-minute intervals. The mean pre-exercise FEV1 was similar on both study days. However, pretreatment for 1 week with salbutamol led to a significantly greater fall in FEV1 after exercise. The FEV1 remained lower than during the placebo arm despite the administration of salbutamol after exercise. This difference persisted 25 minutes after exercise. It is concluded that regular beta-agonist treatment leads to increased exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and a suboptimal bronchodilator response to beta-agonist. The data suggest that previous regular beta-agonist treatment may lead to a failure to respond to emergency bronchodilator treatment during an acute asthma attack and support current opinion that regular short-acting beta-agonist therapy should not be used to treat asthma. To evaluate the effectiveness of a helium-oxygen mixture (79%He- 21%O(2)) as an aerosolizing compressed gas for beta(2)-agonist therapy in patients with an asthma exacerbation.
                Twenty-four patients in the outpatient department with a mild to moderate exacerbation of asthma were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into an experimental group (13 cases) and a control group (11 cases). The experimental group inhaled Berotec with heliox-driven, and the control group inhaled Berotec with compressed air-driven. Eight hospitalized patients in the respiratory department with severe exacerbation of asthma were enrolled. The patients inhaled Berotec with heliox-driven or compressed air-driven in a random order.
                The results of spirometric parameters and arterial blood-gas analysis were measured. In the mild to moderate asthma patients, no statistical differences between the two groups for forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expired volume in one second (FEV(1)), and expiratory flow in 50% forced vital capacity (FEF(50)) were presented. But the severe patients showed significant differences between heliox-driven and compressed air-driven for FVC, FEV(1), FEF(50) and partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2)).
                Compared with the traditional inhalation of beta(2)-agonist therapy using compressed air-driven, the method of inhaling beta(2)-agonist with heliox-driven has more obvious benefits for those suffering from severe asthma. This is likely due to the cooperative effects between inhaling heliox on its physical gas properties and improving delivery of beta(2)-agonist in the treatment of exacerbation of severe asthma. A double blind, parallel group study was carried out to investigate the effect of inhaled budesonide in a moderate (200 micrograms) and a low (100 micrograms) twice daily dosage compared with the effect of placebo in 103 adults with mild symptomatic asthma. Subjects recorded peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and beta 2 agonist consumption at home for a period of seven weeks (a one week run in and six weeks' treatment). Morning baseline PEF (around 80% of predicted normal) increased non-significantly to 88% with 200 micrograms budesonide daily and to 90% (p less than 0.05) with 400 micrograms, compared with 81% with placebo. Evening PEF (around 94% of predicted normal) did not change significantly with active or placebo treatment. By comparison with placebo, there was a significant decrease in nocturnal asthma symptoms and beta 2 agonist consumption. The changes during the day were less pronounced and significant only for 400 micrograms budesonide daily. No significant differences between the two active treatments were detected. It is concluded that low doses of inhaled budesonide are effective in patients with mild symptomatic asthma, particularly for night time symptoms and early morning lung function. The early introduction of inhaled corticosteroids for patients with mild asthma and night time symptoms may improve their quality of life during the night and early morning. Sixteen patients suffering from bronchial asthma, with or without chronic bronchitis, sufficiently severe to be treated with inhaled corticosteroids, were studied in a single-blind trial (blind observer) of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) given in three randomized dosage regimens: 500, 1000 and 2000 micrograms per day, each for 4 weeks. The beta 2-adrenergic agonist response curve showed a dose-dependent increase in FEV1 which was not affected by different doses of BDP. A small but significant reduction in basal cortisol levels was observed after BDP 500 micrograms/day. There was no significant difference between the various doses of BDP in reducing cortisol level and stimulation with tetracosactide remained unchanged. The study showed a gradual, dose-dependent improvement in lung function, statistically significant for morning peak expiratory flow rate at BDP 2000 micrograms/day. Dyspnoea score and beta 2-agonist use decreased, reflecting the anti-asthmatic effects. An increase in total leukocyte count was observed, together with a decrease in the eosinophil count. Oral candidiasis was seen in 2 out of 16 patients. It is concluded that the clinical anti-asthmatic effects of corticosteroid treatment by inhalation are not due to modulation of beta 2-receptor function in the airways. Regular inhaled beta 2 agonist causes tolerance to the acute protective effect of beta 2 agonist against bronchoconstriction induced by chemical stimuli such as AMP, histamine, and methacholine. We examined a more clinically relevant stimulus, inhaled allergen, in a double-blind, cross-over, random-order trial in 13 mild atopic asthmatics, who had not used beta 2 agonist for at least 4 weeks. We compared regular inhaled salbutamol (200 micrograms four times daily for 2 weeks) with placebo (2 weeks) for effects on bronchodilator response, baseline methacholine, and allergen airway responsiveness, and on the acute protective effect of salbutamol against both stimuli. Baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), bronchodilator response, and methacholine responsiveness were the same during both treatment periods. After regular salbutamol, the allergen PC20 (provocation concentration producing a 20% FEV1 decrease) fell by 0.91 (SD 0.66) (p = 0.0009) doubling doses, and the protective effects of salbutamol on methacholine and allergen were both significantly reduced (p = 0.026 and 0.025, respectively). Taking into account the reduced baseline allergen PC20, the post-salbutamol allergen PC20 was almost 2 doubling doses (1.94 [1.43], p < 0.01) lower during salbutamol treatment. Thus, 2 weeks of regular inhaled salbutamol increased airway responsiveness to allergen but not to methacholine, and caused tolerance to the protective effect of salbutamol on bronchoconstriction induced by both stimuli. These effects of inhaled beta 2 agonist provide further evidence to support detrimental effects of their regular use. Long-acting beta(2)-agonists are prescribed for patients with persistent asthma and are sometimes used without inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). No evidence exists, however, to support their use as monotherapy in adults with persistent asthma.
                To examine the effectiveness of salmeterol xinafoate, a long-acting beta(2)-agonist, as replacement therapy in patients whose asthma is well controlled by low-dose triamcinolone acetonide, an ICS.
                A 28-week, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial conducted at 6 National Institutes of Health-sponsored, university-based ambulatory care centers from February 1997 to January 1999.
                One hundred sixty-four patients aged 12 through 65 years with persistent asthma that was well controlled during a 6-week run-in period of treatment with inhaled triamcinolone (400 microg twice per day).
                Patients were randomly assigned to continue triamcinolone therapy (400 microg twice per day; n = 54) or switch to salmeterol (42 microg twice per day; n = 54) or to placebo (n = 56) for 16 weeks, after which all patients received placebo for an additional 6-week run-out period.
                Change in morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), self-assessed asthma symptom scores, rescue albuterol use, asthma-specific quality-of-life scores, treatment failure, asthma exacerbation, bronchial reactivity, and markers of airway inflammation, compared among the 3 treatment groups.
                During the 16-week randomized treatment period, no significant differences between the salmeterol and triamcinolone groups were observed for conventional outcomes of clinical studies of asthma therapy-morning PEF, evening PEF, asthma symptom scores, rescue albuterol sulfate use, or quality of life. Both active treatments were superior to placebo. However, the salmeterol group had more treatment failures than the triamcinolone group (13/54 [24%] vs 3/54 [6%]; P =.004), as well as more asthma exacerbations (11/54 [20%] vs 4/54 [7%]; P =.04), greater increases in median (interquartile range) sputum eosinophils (2.4% [0.0% to 10.6%] vs -0.1% [-0.7% to 0.3%]; P<.001), eosinophil cationic protein (71 [-2 to 430] U/L vs -4 [-31 to 56] U/L; P =.005), and tryptase (3.1 [2.1 to 7.6] ng/mL vs 0.0 [0.0 to 0.7] ng/mL; P<.001). The duration of benefit when patients were switched from active treatment to placebo after 22 weeks of randomized treatment was not significantly longer in the triamcinolone group than in the salmeterol group.
                Patients with persistent asthma well controlled by low doses of triamcinolone cannot be switched to salmeterol monotherapy without risk of clinically significant loss of asthma control. Beta-2 agonists protect against non-specific bronchoconstricting agents such as methacholine, but it has been suggested that the protection afforded by long acting beta 2 agonists wanes rapidly with regular treatment.
                The changes in airway responsiveness were investigated during and after eight weeks of regular treatment with salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily in 26 adult asthmatic patients, 19 of whom were receiving maintenance inhaled corticosteroids. The study was of a randomised, placebo controlled, double blind design. Airway responsiveness to methacholine was measured as PD20 by a standardised dosimeter technique 12 hours after the first dose, at four weeks and eight weeks during treatment (12 hours after the last dose of test medication), and at 60 hours, one week and two weeks after stopping treatment.
                There were no significant differences between the baseline characteristics of the two groups. A significant improvement in PD20 was seen at all points during treatment with salmeterol compared with the placebo group, with no significant fall off with time. PD20 measurements returned to baseline values after cessation of treatment with no significant difference from the placebo group.
                Salmeterol gave significant protection against methacholine induced bronchoconstriction 12 hours after administration. This protection was of small magnitude, but there was no significant attenuation with eight weeks of regular use and no rebound increase in airway responsiveness on stopping treatment in a group of moderate asthmatic patients, the majority of whom were receiving inhaled corticosteroids. Poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids is an important problem in asthma management. Previous approaches to improving adherence have had limited success.
                To determine whether treatment with a single inhaler containing a long-acting beta(2)-agonist and a corticosteroid for maintenance treatment and symptom relief can overcome the problem of poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids.
                Randomised, parallel group, open-label trial.
                Forty-four general practices in Nottinghamshire.
                Participants who used less than 70% of their prescribed dose of inhaled corticosteroid and had poorly controlled asthma were randomised to budesonide 200 microg one puff twice daily plus their own short-acting beta(2)-agonist as required (control group), or budesonide/formoterol 200/6 microg one puff once daily and as required (active group) for 6 months. The primary outcome was inhaled corticosteroid dose.
                Seventy-one participants (35 control, 36 active group) were randomised. Adherence with budesonide in the control group was approximately 60% of the prescribed dose. Participants in the active group used approximately 80% more budesonide than participants in the control group (448 versus 252 microg/day, mean difference 196 mug, 95% confidence interval 113 to 279; P<0.001) and were less likely to withdraw from the study (3 versus 13; P<0.01). No safety issues were identified.
                Using a single inhaler for both maintenance treatment and symptom relief approximately doubled the dose of inhaled corticosteroid taken, suggesting this could be a useful strategy to overcome the problems related to poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids. The efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol (BDA) 100 micrograms q.i.d. was compared with that of budesonide aerosol 10 micrograms q.i.d. in 17 patients. The efficacy of inhaled BDA 100 micrograms q.i.d. was also compared with that of budesonide 50 micrograms q.i.d. with and without an extension tube (Inhalet) attached to the actuator in 23 patients. Both studies included placebo periods. The trials were performed with the cross-over technique in patients with stable asthma. Each treatment was randomized and given in periods of two weeks starting with a run-in period. The patients recorded peak expiratory flow rates (PEF) twice daily and filled in diary cards for cough, wheeze, breathing difficulties and use of beta 2-receptor stimulant aerosol. In the first study the patients came to the hospital twice weekly throughout the trial for spirometry and interview. In the second study they came every second week. Budesonide and BDA were superior to placebo. Budesonide in doses of 100 micrograms and 50 micrograms were as efficacious as BDA 100 micrograms q.i.d., while budesonide 50 micrograms q.i.d. with Inhalet was slightly more effective. Treatment for two weeks was found to be sufficient. For each parameter the average of the last four days of each period was found to be relevant in the comparison. The placebo period should preferably not be placed at random in the trial, but as the last treatment period. To investigate the effects of inhaled beta-agonists on sub-maximal and maximal exercise capacity, breathing pattern, dyspnoea, leg-discomfort and spirometry in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).
                Eight patients performed two maximal incremental cycle-ergometry tests on separate days with inhaled placebo or salbutamol (600 microg) administered before each test in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Primary outcomes were exercise duration (Exdur) in seconds (s) and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in litres/minute (L/min). Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was measured immediately pre-inhaler, post-inhaler and post-exercise. Dyspnoea and leg-discomfort were assessed post-exercise.
                Within-day FEV1 comparisons demonstrated that the placebo test day FEV1 improved significantly post-exercise (0.11 L, p<0.05) and the salbutamol test day FEV1 improved significantly post-inhaler (0.22 L, p<0.001) and post-exercise (0.07 L, p<0.01). Between-day FEV1 comparisons demonstrated significant improvements in post-inhaler (0.17 L, p<0.05) and post-exercise (0.13 L, p<0.05) FEV1 following salbutamol. Sub-maximal and maximal exercise showed no significant difference as shown by Exdur (547+/-154 s vs. 529+/-127 s) and VO2max (1.9+/-0.5 L/min vs. 1.9+/-0.6 L/min). No significant change in breathing pattern, dyspnoea or leg-discomfort was detected. The study had a power of 92% to detect a 10% improvement in Exdur.
                In adults with CF, salbutamol improves post-exercise FEV1 and is safe when administered immediately before exercise but does not improve exercise capacity, exercise-induced dyspnoea or leg-discomfort. We studied the effect of inhaled budesonide on bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in twenty mild asthmatic patients. The study was conducted as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Before entering the study, the patients performed methacholine inhalation challenge (MIC) using a reservoir method to assess BHR. Then, they were randomly allocated to receive budesonide turbuhaler (200 micrograms/dose) or placebo turbuhaler two inhalations, twice daily for eight weeks. During the study, each patient recorded daily asthma score and daily number of puffs of beta 2 agonist and they were assessed at weeks 4 and 8. At the end of the treatment, MIC was repeated again. Patients receiving budesonide showed a significant improvement in airway responsiveness compared with those receiving placebo (p < 0.05). They also showed a significant improvement in asthma severity score and a significant decrease in beta 2 agonist bronchodilator use. This study also suggested that inhaled corticosteroids may be the primary treatment in patients, even with mild asthmatic and well-controlled symptoms. It is well documented that the perception of dyspnea (POD), subjectively reported by patients, is related to the activity and strength of the inspiratory muscles, and influences the use of 'as needed' beta2-agonists.
                To investigate the relationship among the increase in inspiratory muscle strength after specific inspiratory muscle training, beta2-agonist consumption and the POD in patients with persistent, mild to moderate asthma.
                Inspiratory muscle strength, daily beta2-agonist consumption and the POD were measured in 30 patients with mild to moderate asthma. Patients were then randomly assigned to two groups: one group received specific inspiratory muscle training until an increase of more than 20 cm H2O was reached, and one group was a control group and received sham training. Inspiratory muscle strength, the POD and daily beta2-agonist consumption were assessed during and after the training period.
                There was no good correlation between the baseline maximal inspiratory pressure and the POD, or between the baseline maximal inspiratory pressure and the mean daily beta2-agonist consumption. However, there was a significant correlation between the POD and the mean daily beta2-agonist consumption. The increase in inspiratory muscle strength after the inspiratory muscle training was closely correlated with the decrease in the POD (P<0.001) and the decrease in beta2-agonist consumption (P<0.001).
                The present study shows that, in patients with mild to moderate, persistent asthma, there is a correlation between the POD and the mean daily beta2-agonist consumption. When the inspiratory muscles are strengthened, there is a significant decrease in the POD and in beta2-agonist consumption. Regular treatment with salbutamol increases airway responsiveness to allergen but not to methacholine and produces tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salbutamol. The current study addresses the effect of inhaled corticosteroid on these aspects of regular beta 2 agonist use. A group of 13 atopic asthmatic subjects free from all asthma medications and remote from allergen exposure were studied. We used a double-blind, random-order, crossover study to compare four 1-wk treatment periods with > or = 1 wk washout: placebo, salbutamol, 200 micrograms four times per day, budesonide, 400 micrograms four times per day, and the combination of salbutamol and budesonide. We measured the methacholine PC20 and the methacholine dose shift produced acutely by 200 micrograms salbutamol after 7 d and the allergen PC15 after 8 d treatment. Blinded medications were withheld for 8 to 10 h before measurements. The methacholine PC20 was not affected by regular salbutamol but increased significantly (p < 0.014) after both budesonide-containing regimens. Neither the dose shift nor its significant reduction by regularly used beta 2 agonist were influenced by the inhaled corticosteroid. The four allergen PC15 values were significantly different from each other. Compared with placebo, the allergen PC15 was 0.6 doubling doses lower after salbutamol (p = 0.021) and 1.3 doubling doses higher after budesonide (p < 0.001); the allergen PC15 was reduced by 0.53 doubling doses from this new baseline (p = 0.039) when salbutamol and budesonide were used together.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To evaluate the effect of Buteyko breathing techniques (BBT) in the management of asthma.
                Prospective, blinded, randomised study comparing the effect of BBT with control classes in 39 subjects with asthma. The study was conducted from January 1995 to April 1995.
                Subjects recruited from the community, aged 12 to 70 years, with asthma and substantial medication use.
                Medication use; morning peak expiratory flow (PEF); forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1); end-tidal (ET) CO2; resting minute volume (MV); and quality of life (QOL) score, measured at three months.
                No change in daily PEF or FEV1 was noted in either group. At three months, the BBT group had a median reduction in daily beta 2-agonist dose of 904 micrograms (range, 29 micrograms to 3129 micrograms), whereas the control group had a median reduction of 57 micrograms (range, -2343 micrograms to 1143 micrograms) (P = 0.002). Daily inhaled steroid dose fell 49% (range, -100% to 150%) for the BBT group and 0 (range, -82% to +100%) for the control group (P = 0.06). A trend towards greater improvement in QOL score was noted for BBT subjects (P = 0.09). Initial MV was high and similar in both groups; by three months, MV was lower in the BBT group than in the control group (P = 0.004). ET CO2 was low in both groups and did not change with treatment.
                Those practising BBT reduced hyperventilation and their use of beta 2-agonists. A trend toward reduced inhaled steroid use and better quality of life was observed in these patients without objective changes in measures of airway calibre. Long-term treatment with short-acting beta 2-sympathomimetic drugs has recently been suggested to be due to a rise in asthma mortality. This effect has been attributed to an increase in bronchial hyperreactivity, a desensitization of beta 2-adrenoceptors and/or a rebound effect after cessation of the therapy. Formoterol, a new long-acting beta 2-symathomimetic drug, has been reported to possess not only bronchodilatation but also antiinflammatory effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether long-term effects of salbutamol and/or formoterol could deteriorate asthma management. Therefore, in a trial lasting 90 days, we evaluated the effects of the two drugs on lung function, on the protection they provided against inhalative provocation with histamine, and on tachyphylaxis as monitored by the beta-adrenergic density on mononuclear leukocytes (MNL). Two groups of 11 children each with stable asthma were treated with daily doses of either 4 x 200 micrograms salbutamol or 2 x 24 micrograms formoterol in monotherapy. The lung function was measured six times during the trial period, on day 1, and on day 90, before and after inhaling the drug and at all investigations both with and without histamine provocation. In both groups, the bronchodilatory effect of either formoterol or salbutamol remained constant. The lung function values before and after drug inhalation (specific airway resistance sRAW, forced expiration volume FEV1, vital capacity VC) did not alter significantly. After histamine provocation, the protection was more pronounced in the formoterol group. No changes in the beta-adrenoceptor density on MNL and no significant side effects were seen throughout the trial period. We therefore conclude that formoterol protects significantly better against the bronchial challenge with histamine than does salbutamol. Both drugs did not deteriorate the lung function in asthmatic children. In addition, there was no evidence that long-term treatment leads to a desensitization of beta 2-sympathomimetic effects. To determine whether the administration of beta2-agonist by Metered Dose inhaler (MDI) with accessory device (AD) is a as effective as the administration of beta2-agonist by small volume nebulizers (SVN) for the treatment of acute asthma.
                A cross sectional study was conducted at Emergency Room (ER) of National Institute of Child Health (NICH), Karachi, between October 2000 to March 2001. This study included 150 children, 6 months and older with a history of wheeze and presenting with an acute asthma exacerbation. Children were categorized into mild, moderate and severe asthma according to medical scoring system. Children were assigned randomly into group A and B to receive standard dose of beta2-agonist (salbutamol) by MDI/AD (group A) or SVN (group B). Baseline characteristics and asthma severity were recorded. All variables (dyspnoea, use of accessory muscles, cyanosis, respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, pulsus paradoxus, and wheeze) and Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) in children 5 years and older, were determined at pre and post inhalation therapy.
                Both groups did not differ in demographic characteristics. There were no significant differences in outcome measures. In children treated with MDI/ADs and SVNs. PEFR increased significantly in both the groups after completion of treatment, but PEFR was not statistically significant when compared in between groups.
                The data suggested that MDI/AD is an effective alternative to nebulizer for the treatment of children with acute asthma exacerbation in the ER. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is elevated in asthma and reflects eosinophilic airway inflammation. The aim of this prospective, randomized, single-blind study was to examine whether the inclusion of repeated FeNO measurements into asthma monitoring leads to an improvement in asthma outcome. Forty-seven children with mild to moderate asthma were allocated to a FeNO group (n = 22) and to a control group (n = 25). In the FeNO group therapy was based on symptoms, beta-agonist use, lung function, and FeNO whereas in the control group therapy was based on symptoms, beta-agonist use and lung function only. Patients performed five visits in 6 weeks intervals. Frequency of respiratory symptoms, beta-agonist use, FEV(1)% predicted and the frequency of exacerbations were similar between groups. Patients in the FeNO group received higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) (control group: median (interquartile range): 241 microg (26-607 microg); FeNo group: 316 microg (200-500 microg) and had significantly higher MEF(50)% predicted (control group: median (interquartile range): 68.5% (55.8-83.1%); FeNO group: 83.2% (62.9%-98.3%). At a cut-off point of 22.9 ppb FeNO the best predictive value for exacerbations with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 60% was found. Significant relationships were observed between FeNO and dose of ICS (beta = -8.77; P < 0.002), beta-agonist use 2 weeks prior to a visit (beta = 0.11; P < 0.05), asthma symptoms (beta = 0.02; P < 0.0001), and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (beta = 0.04; P = 0.02). In conclusion, FeNO was related to important markers of asthma control. A therapy regimen aimed at lowering FeNO in children with asthma improved parameters of small airway function, but was not able to improve clinical markers of asthma control. There is increasing evidence for the development of tolerance to the protective effects of inhaled beta 2-agonists against bronchoconstrictor stimuli. Animal studies have suggested that glucocorticoids protect against the down-regulation of beta 2-receptors after chronic exposure to beta 2-agonists. In a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study in 12 patients with mild asthma, we investigated the effect of inhaled budesonide or identical placebo on the protection conferred by albuterol (200 micrograms) against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction before and after treatment with the long-acting beta 2-agonist salmeterol. Patients were randomized to be treated for 3 wk with inhaled budesonide (800 micrograms twice a day) or placebo; salmeterol (50 micrograms twice a day) was added during the third week. Airway responsiveness to methacholine was measured 15 min after albuterol, both before and exactly 12 h [corrected] after the last salmeterol dose. Mean FEV1 increased significantly after 2 wk of budesonide (p < 0.05) and increased further after salmeterol (p < 0.05) compared with placebo. After 2 wk, the bronchoprotective effect of albuterol against methacholine was significantly greater with budesonide than with placebo (3.4 versus 2.4 doubling dilutions; p < 0.05), consistent with an improvement in airway hyperresponsiveness with budesonide therapy. However, regular salmeterol treatment for 1 wk significantly diminished the protection conferred by albuterol against methacholine challenge, both with budesonide and with placebo (-1.1 +/- 0.42 and -1.41 +/- 0.30 doubling dilutions, respectively). There was no significant difference in the loss of bronchoprotection seen with salmeterol between budesonide and placebo treatment periods. Our study suggests that even a high dose of an inhaled glucocorticoid fails to prevent the loss of bronchoprotection produced by regular beta 2-agonist therapy. Although many asthmatic patients are treated with a combination of beta2 agonist and corticosteroid inhalers, the clinical effects of combining the drugs are unknown. Studies on the early asthmatic response to allergen suggest that beta2 agonists may reduce the benefit of inhaled corticosteroids. A study of the effects of combining the drugs on asthma control was undertaken.
                Sixty one subjects with mild to moderate asthma were randomised to a double blind crossover comparison of inhaled budesonide (200-400 microg twice daily), terbutaline (500-1000 microg four times daily), combined treatment, and placebo. Each treatment was given for six weeks following a four week washout period. Ipratropium was used for symptom relief. Treatments were ranked from worst (1) to best (4) based on need for oral steroid, mean morning peak flow, nocturnal awakening, ipratropium use, and asthma symptoms. Lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness were measured before and after each treatment.
                Evaluable data for all four treatments were obtained from 47 subjects. The mean rank of each treatment was: placebo = 2.05; terbutaline = 2.13; budesonide = 2.48; combined treatment = 3.34. Combined treatment was ranked significantly better than any other treatment (p<0.01). Mean (95% CI) morning and evening peak flows were 14 (5 to 23) and 24 (15 to 34) l/min higher, respectively, during combined treatment than during budesonide, and 27 (17 to 37) and 15 (7 to 23) l/min higher than during terbutaline. Asthma symptoms tended to be least frequent during combined treatment but were not significantly different from budesonide alone. There was no significant difference between combined treatment and budesonide alone for lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.
                In this group of mild to moderate asthmatic subjects the combination of beta2 agonist and corticosteroid gave better asthma control than either treatment alone. There was no evidence that regular beta2 agonist treatment impaired the beneficial effect of inhaled corticosteroid. Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) has been reformulated in a chlorofluorocarbon-free propellant, hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA), resulting in an extrafine aerosol which gives improved drug delivery to the airways. The objective of this 6 week, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of HFA-BDP 400 micrograms day-1 in 256 adult patients with moderate asthma. This is a lower daily dose than that recommended for existing BDP inhalers in current treatment guidelines for moderate asthma (NIH publication 95-3659). Another objective was to evaluate whether delivering the 400 micrograms dose as four actuations of 50 micrograms twice daily (HFA-BDP 50 micrograms) provided equivalent asthma control to delivering the dose as two actuations of 100 micrograms twice daily (HFA-BDP 100 micrograms) without the use of a spacer or holding chamber. Both active treatments produced a significant change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), which was significantly larger than that in the placebo group (P < or = 0.017) throughout the study. The mean changes from baseline in morning PEF at weeks 5-6 were 47.0 l min-1 in the combined HFA-BDP group and 16.5 l min-1 in the HFA-placebo group. The two dose strengths were statistically equivalent (P = 0.017 for equivalence testing). The active treatments also produced significant improvements compared with placebo in evening PEF, forced expiratory volume in the first second, forced expiratory flow over 25-75% of vital capacity, sleep disturbance scores and daily beta-agonist use. The study medication was well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse events. The results from this study demonstrate that a daily dose of 400 micrograms HFA-BDP (given in 50 micrograms and 100 micrograms strengths) provides dose proportionality and effective control in patients with moderate asthma. Asthma is characterized by hyperresponsiveness of the airways to bronchoconstrictive stimuli. Long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists have been introduced as a new therapeutic approach, but there is growing concern about whether control of asthma may deteriorate with the regular use of these agents. We investigated the long-term effects of the beta 2 agonist salmeterol on bronchodilation and on airway hyperresponsiveness to the bronchoconstrictive agent methacholine in mild asthma.
                In a parallel, double-blind study, 24 patients with mild asthma were randomly assigned to treatment with either inhaled salmeterol (50 micrograms, twice daily) (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12) during an eight-week trial. Methacholine challenge was performed before, during, and after the treatment period. Methacholine responsiveness was measured as the provocative concentration (PC20) that caused a 20 percent decrease in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1).
                There was a significant increase in FEV1 one hour after the inhalation of salmeterol (P = 0.006), which did not differ significantly on days 0, 28, and 56 of the treatment period (increase, 9.8, 9.4, and 8.8 percent of predicted FEV1, respectively; P = 0.91). On the first treatment day, salmeterol afforded significant protection against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction, as shown by a 10-fold increase in the PC20 as compared with the value at entry (P less than 0.001). After four and eight weeks of treatment, however, the salmeterol-induced change in the PC20 was significantly attenuated (P less than 0.001) to only a twofold increase. Two and four days after treatment ended, the PC20 was not significantly different from the value before treatment (P = 0.15).
                Regular treatment of patients with mild asthma with salmeterol leads to tolerance to its protective effects against a bronchoconstrictor stimulus, in this case inhaled methacholine, despite well-maintained bronchodilation. This finding raises concern about the effectiveness of prolonged therapy with long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists in asthma. Tolerance to the direct bronchodilator effects of beta 2-agonists does not appear to occur in asthma. However, it is not known whether this is true for the nonbronchodilator effects of these agents, which protect the airways against bronchoconstrictive stimuli.
                We investigated whether tolerance develops to the protective effect of inhaled terbutaline on airway responsiveness to the bronchoconstrictors methacholine (which acts directly on airway smooth muscle) and AMP (which acts indirectly by stimulating the release of mediators from mast cells) during sustained treatment with terbutaline. In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, 12 patients with mild asthma each inhaled a single dose of terbutaline (500 micrograms) or placebo before a challenge with a series of doubling doses of inhaled methacholine or AMP, before and after treatment for seven days with 500 micrograms of terbutaline four times daily or placebo.
                Before the seven days of treatment with terbutaline, a single dose of terbutaline reduced airway responsiveness to methacholine by 2.7 doubling doses (95 percent confidence interval, 1.9 to 3.5), but it had an even greater protective effect against AMP, reducing airway responsiveness by 3.8 doubling doses (95 percent confidence interval, 2.7 to 4.9; P less than 0.001). After seven days of treatment with terbutaline, the protective effect of terbutaline against methacholine decreased to 2.2 doubling doses (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.0; P = 0.04), and that against AMP decreased even more, to 1.7 doubling doses (95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.4; P less than 0.001). By contrast, the bronchodilator response to terbutaline was unchanged during seven days of treatment with this agent.
                We observed tolerance to the nonbronchodilator actions of the inhaled beta 2-agonist terbutaline in patients with mild asthma, an effect that may be more pronounced in mast cells than in bronchial smooth muscle. This property of beta-agonists may constitute a drawback to their regular use in patients with asthma. The effect of slow-release aminophylline, salbutamol and a half dose combination of both was compared in children with chronic asthma. Drugs were given over three consecutive 5-week periods during which patients recorded daily peak flow measurements and symptom scores. At the end of each treatment period pulmonary function tests were done. Sixteen of twenty-nine children completed the trial satisfactorily and their results have been used for analysis. The data show slow-release aminophylline and salbutamol to be equally effective and the half dose combination as effective as either drug alone. The results suggest there may be a therapeutic advantage in combining a beta 2 agonist with theophylline when high doses of either drug alone are not fully effective or when toxic effects occur. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the second controller medications (long-acting beta2-agonist, leukotriene receptor antagonist and sustained-release theophylline) used in addition to inhaler corticosteroid treatment in moderate persistent asthma. A total of 64 patients with asthma, in the moderate persistent asthma category, were divided into three groups. Patients, all of whom were concurrently using inhaled corticosteroid (Budesonide 400 microg twice daily), were treated for 3 months with either inhaled formoterol 9 microg twice daily (first group), oral zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily (second group), or sustained-release theophylline 400 mg once daily (third group). All of the patients were subjected to assessments on the subject of peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), asthma symptom scores (daytime and night-time), supplemental terbutalin use, asthma exacerbations and adverse events. Over the 3-month treatment period. In all of the three groups, significant improvements were recorded in the lung function, asthma symptom scores and supplemental terbutalin use criteria, as a result oftreatments applied. Formoterol treatment resulted in significantly greater and earlier improvements compared with the other two groups in several criteria: PEF variability (17.9 +/- 2.5; 21.9 +/- 3.2; 23.7 +/- 3.3; P < 0.001); asthma symptom score (daytime) (1.6 +/- 0.5; 1 +/- 0.5; 2.0 +/- 0,5; P < 0.05); asthma symptom score (night-time) (1.2 +/- 0.4; 2.2 +/- 0.5; 16 +/- 0.6; P < 0001); and supplement alter butalin use (1.2 +/- 0.3; 1.8 +/- 0.5; 1.7 +/- 0.5; P < 0.05). However, at the end of the treatment, in all of the three groups studied, improvements were attained in overall asthma control and there was no statistical difference among the groups. Although there were no side effects which required the discontinuation of the treatment, it was observed that the maximum side effect was in the second group (20%, 31.6% and 20%, respectively). In conclusion, in patients who still have symptoms on treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, the addition of a long-acting beta2-agonist, leukotriene antagonists or sustained-release theophylline to the treatment is a logical approach, and, in addition to inhaled corticosteroids, any one of these second controller medications may be chosen in patients with moderate asthma. The aim of the present study was to examine the efficacy of low-dose inhaled budesonide (BUD) administered via Turbuhaler once or twice daily on symptoms, lung function and bronchial hyperreactivity in children with mild asthma. One hundred and sixty-three children (mean age 9.9 yrs, 56 females/107 males) with mild asthma (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 103% of predicted, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 87% pred, reversibility in FEV1 3%, fall in FEV1 after exercise 10.4% from pre-exercise value) and not previously treated with inhaled steroids, were included in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. After a two-week run-in period, the children received inhaled BUD 100 microg or 200 microg once daily in the morning, 100 microg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Exercise and methacholine challenges were performed before and at the end of treatment. After 12 weeks of therapy, the fall in FEV1 after an exercise test was significantly less in all three BUD groups (43-5.1%) than in the placebo group (8.6%). Bronchial hyperreactivity to methacholine with the provocative dose causing a 20% fall in FEV1 decreased significantly in the BUD 100 microg twice-daily group compared with placebo (ratio at the end of treatment 156%). Changes in baseline lung function (FEV1 and PEF) were less marked than changes in bronchial responsiveness. In conclusion, low doses of inhaled budesonide, given once or twice daily, provided protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children with mild asthma and near normal lung function. Airway inflammation can be demonstrated in mildly asthmatic patients who are not treated with inhaled steroids. Current guidelines recommend that inhaled steroids should be introduced in mild asthmatics who use an inhaled beta2-agonist more than once daily. It was postulated that inhaled steroids can have anti-inflammatory effects in patients with even milder disease. The effect of 4 weeks of treatment with budesonide (800 microg twice daily by Turbohaler) was studied in 10 steroid-naive mildly asthmatic patients (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) = 96+/-1.4% predicted) who required an inhaled beta2-agonist less than one puff daily, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover fashion. Spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), bronchial responsiveness (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20)), and sputum induction were performed before and after each treatment period. Following budesonide treatment, there were significant improvements in FEV1, and PC20, in association with a significant reduction in the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum. Exhaled NO levels tended towards reduction, but the change was nonsignificant. There were also nonsignificant reductions in sputum eosinophil cationic protein and tumour necrosis factor-alpha levels. In conclusion inhaled budesonide can lead to improvements in noninvasive markers of airway inflammation, in association with a small improvement in lung function, even in mildly asthmatic patients who require an inhaled beta2-agonist less than once daily. This suggests a potential benefit of inhaled corticosteroids, even in relatively asymptomatic asthma. In addition to their bronchodilatory effects, beta(2)-agonists protect against bronchoconstriction, such as that caused by methacholine challenge. However, tachyphylaxis to this beneficial effect develops after chronic use of beta(2)-agonists. We studied whether the frequency or dose of treatment with a long-acting beta(2)-agonist (formoterol) affects the degree of bronchoprotection afforded against methacholine challenge and to compare this with the effects of a short-acting beta(2)-agonist (terbutaline).
                In a randomized, parallel group, double-blind study at two centers, patients with stable asthma of mild to moderate severity who were treated with inhaled corticosteroids were treated with formoterol 6 micrograms twice daily, 24 micrograms twice daily, 12 micrograms once daily; terbutaline 500 micrograms four times daily; or placebo. Treatments were given by dry powder inhaler for a period of 2 weeks. Of the 72 patients who were enrolled, 67 completed the study. Methacholine challenge was performed to calculate the provocative dose that caused a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second at baseline (unprotected) after an initial 1-week run-in without beta(2)-agonists, 1 hour after the first dose of study treatment, and again 1 hour after 7 and 14 days of study treatment.
                Each of the four active treatments exhibited significant tachyphylaxis (P < 0.05) to protection against methacholine challenge when comparing first/last dose (as geometric mean protection ratio versus baseline): formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily (9.6-fold/1.6-fold), 12 micrograms once daily (7.1-fold/2.2-fold), 6 micrograms twice daily (6.2-fold/2.3-fold), and terbutaline 500 micrograms four times daily (2.9-fold/2.0-fold). There were no significant differences among treatments after 2 weeks in bronchoprotection against methacholine challenge. For all formoterol regimens, the bronchodilator response 1 hour after inhalation was maintained over the 2-week treatment period. Diurnal control of morning and evening peak flow was significantly better with formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily than with terbutaline.
                Tachyphylaxis to bronchoprotection against methacholine challenge develops after 2 weeks of therapy with formoterol, a long-acting beta(2)-agonist, at all three dosage regimens that were tested. In contrast, the bronchodilator effects of formoterol were maintained during the 2 weeks of treatment. The dose-response effects of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) administered b.i.d. with the aid of metered dose aerosols were studied in 128 patients (67 men and 61 women, mean age 53 years) suffering from asthma bronchiale. The study was designed as a multi-centre, double-blind, four-period cross-over study, followed by a single-blind double placebo period. BDP was administered in doses of 400 and 1000 micrograms, and BUD in doses of 400 and 800 micrograms. The results in terms of peak expiratory flow (PEF) in the morning and evening, daily symptoms score and use of inhaled beta 2-agonists did not reveal any clinically significant differences between the drugs or between high (800 micrograms BUD, 1000 micrograms BDP) and low (400 micrograms BUD/BDP) doses. However, statistically significant differences were recorded for the corresponding parameters when comparing the placebo with preceding steroid periods. Adverse effects consisting mainly of oropharyngeal candidiasis, hoarseness and cough occurred in 54 of 468 treatment months (12%). The carry-over effects of inhaled steroids are longer lasting than was previously assumed. We wanted to evaluate whether treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid and an inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist is more effective than an inhaled corticosteroid alone for patients using as-needed albuterol who are initiating maintenance treatment.
                To compare the efficacy and safety of twice-daily fluticasone propionate (FP) 88 microg and salmeterol 42 microg combined in a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free (hydrofluoroalkane 134a) metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with the individual agents alone, each delivered through an MDI containing CFC propellants, in patient with persistent asthma previously uncontrolled with as-needed short-acting beta2-agonists alone.
                Patients with asthma (n = 283) were randomized to twice-daily treatment for 12 weeks with FP 88 microg combined with salmeterol 42 microg (FSC) in a CFC-free MDI or the individual components alone from CFC-containing MDIs.
                At endpoint, mean change from baseline in morning predose forced expiratory volume in 1 second was significantly (P < or = 0.016) greater with FSC (0.69 L) compared with FP (0.51 L) or salmeterol (0.47 L). Fewer patients treated with FSC withdrew due to worsening asthma (1%) compared with FP (3%) or salmeterol (8%; P = 0.024). FSC significantly increased (P < or = 0.002) morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate at endpoint (66.5 and 51.5 L/min, respectively) compared with FP (43.0 and 29.9 L/min, respectively) and salmeterol (29.2 and 21.6 L/min, respectively). In addition, asthma symptom scores were reduced, and percentages of days with no asthma symptoms increased in all treatment groups.
                Treatment with FSC in a CFC-free MDI is more effective than FP or salmeterol alone in asthma patients who are symptomatic taking short-acting beta2-agonists alone. Information is lacking on the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness--in a real-life primary-care setting--of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) and long-acting beta2 adrenergic receptor agonists (beta2 agonists) as add-on therapy for patients whose asthma symptoms are not controlled on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).
                To estimate the cost effectiveness of LTRAs compared with long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy for patients whose asthma symptoms are not controlled on low-dose ICS.
                An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 2-year, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial set in 53 primary-care practices in the UK. Patients aged 12-80 years with asthma insufficiently controlled with ICS (n = 361) were randomly assigned to add-on LTRAs (n = 176) or long-acting beta2 agonists (n = 185). The main outcome measures were the incremental cost per point improvement in the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ), per point improvement in the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and per QALY gained from perspectives of the UK NHS and society.
                Over 2 years, the societal cost per patient receiving LTRAs was pounds sterling 1157 versus pounds sterling 952 for long-acting beta2 agonists, a (significant, adjusted) increase of pounds sterling 214 (95% CI 2, 411) [year 2005 values]. Patients receiving LTRAs experienced a non-significant incremental gain of 0.009 QALYs (95% CI -0.077, 0.103). The incremental cost per QALY gained from the societal (NHS) perspective was pounds sterling 22,589 (pounds sterling 11,919). Uncertainty around this point estimate suggested that, given a maximum willingness to pay of pounds sterling 30,000 per QALY gained, the probability that LTRAs are a cost-effective alternative to long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy was approximately 52% from both societal and NHS perspectives.
                On balance, these results marginally favour the repositioning of LTRAs as a cost-effective alternative to long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy to ICS for asthma. However, there is much uncertainty surrounding the incremental cost effectiveness because of similarity of clinical benefit and broad confidence intervals for differences in healthcare costs.
                UK National Research Register N0547145240; Controlled Clinical Trials ISRCTN99132811. The effect of regular inhalation of betamethasone valerate (800 microgram daily) on exercise-induced asthma has been studied in 18 adult patients. The active aerosol was compared with placebo in a double-blind cross-over study, each inhaler being used for four weeks. Exercise tests after each period of treatment were performed using a cycle ergometer, care being taken to match the oxygen uptake during exercise each time a patient was tested. Twelve patients experienced less exercise-induced fall in peak expiratory flow rate after the corticosteroid inhaler, while six did not. This effect appeared to be independent of any alteration in base-line lung function, suggesting that it was due primarily to diminution of bronchial hyperreactivity. It is suggested that this change may have been due to interference with the synthesis or release of mediator substances from mast cells. BACKGROUND and objective: The efficacy and safety of twice-daily inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC) therapy have been well established in the treatment of adults and adolescents with asthma. Once-daily administration of SFC could also be appropriate in patients with mild persistent asthma. This study aimed to investigate whether once-daily SFC 50 microg/100 microg was at least as effective as fluticasone propionate (FP) 100 microg twice daily, and more effective than twice-daily placebo, over 52 weeks as initial maintenance therapy in patients with mild persistent asthma.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group study carried out in primary and secondary care. Patients aged between 12 and 79 years with a documented clinical history of asthma for > or =6 months who were currently receiving inhaled short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists only were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either once-daily inhaled SFC 50 microg/100 microg, twice-daily inhaled FP 100 microg (i.e. twice the dose of FP compared with SFC) or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoints were mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), as recorded by patients prior to the use of bronchodilator or study medication, and the rate of investigator-recorded asthma exacerbations.
                Patients receiving twice-daily FP and once-daily SFC showed greater improvements in mean morning PEF compared with those receiving placebo (FP, difference in means 20.1 L/min; 95% CI 14.7, 25.5; p < 0.001; SFC, difference in means 14.8 L/min; 95% CI 9.4, 20.2; p < 0.001). The difference in adjusted mean PEF between once-daily SFC and twice-daily FP was -5.3 L/min (95% CI -9.1, -1.6). PEF results showed that once-daily SFC was non-inferior to twice-daily FP. Over 52 weeks, there was a 35% reduction in exacerbation rates with once-daily SFC, which in this respect demonstrated superiority over placebo (p < 0.001). Non-inferiority between once-daily SFC and twice-daily FP with respect to exacerbation rates was not shown. Once-daily SFC significantly improved clinic forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity (difference in means 0.129 L/s; p < 0.001) and clinic PEF (difference in means 10.8 L/min; p < 0.001) compared with twice-daily FP. Both treatments were well tolerated and the safety profile of each was similar to that seen with placebo.
                In patients with mild persistent asthma not previously receiving maintenance therapy, once-daily SFC 50 microg/100 microg is an effective treatment compared with placebo, and was non-inferior to twice-daily FP 100 microg with respect to mean morning PEF. However, in this study, once-daily SFC was not as efficacious as twice-daily FP in reducing asthma exacerbation rates. This study confirms the benefits of regular maintenance treatment in patients with mild persistent asthma. In a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial, 340 asthmatic patients aged 12-70 years received budesonide 400 micrograms once daily in the morning, budesonide 400 micrograms once daily in the evening, budesonide 200 micrograms twice daily or placebo, for 12 weeks in addition to inhaled short-acting beta 2-agonists used as required (p.r.n.). Budesonide was given as Pulmicort Turbohaler. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) increased by 20 to 30 1 min-1 in each of the active treatment groups, significantly more than in the placebo group (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the active treatment groups. Symptom improvement and decreased beta 2-agonist use reflected the PEFR data. Incidences of adverse events in the active treatment groups were similar to those observed in the placebo group. Budesonide 400 micrograms given once daily morning or evening is equieffective with the same total daily dose given twice daily in the treatment of mild to moderate stable asthmatics.
In general, these results support current guidelines, although it has given reassuring evidence against concerns over regular use of inhaled short-acting beta-2 agonists.