Abdominal access in gynaecological laparoscopy: a comparison between direct optical and blind closed access by Verres needle. Direct trocar insertion vs Veress needle in nonobese patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures: a randomized prospective single-center study. Randomized trial comparing a radially expandable needle system with cutting trocars. Randomized, prospective, single-blind trial of a new parallel technique of Veress pneumoperitoneum needle insertion versus the conventional closed method. Direct trocar insertion vs. Verres needle use for laparoscopic sterilization. A randomized comparison of Verres needle and direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy. Direct trocar versus veress needle entry for laparoscopy: a randomized clinical trial. Prospective study comparing the bladeless optical access trocar versus Hasson open trocar for the establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic renal procedures. Randomized double-masked comparison of radially expanding access device and conventional cutting tip trocar in laparoscopy. A randomized, prospective study comparing the use of the missile trocar and the pyramidal trocar for laparoscopy access. Efficacy of establishment of pneumoperitoneum with the Veress needle, Hasson trocar, and modified blunt trocar (TrocDoc): a randomized study. A randomized prospective study of radially expanding trocars in laparoscopic surgery. Transfundal insertion of a Veress needle in laparoscopy of obese subjects: a practical alternative. The effect of an alveolar recruitment strategy on oxygenation during laparascopic cholecystectomy. Prospective randomized comparison of cutting and dilating disposable trocars for access during laparoscopic renal surgery. Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study. A prospective randomized study to compare ultrasound-guided with nonultrasound-guided double lumen internal jugular catheter insertion as a temporary hemodialysis access. Randomized trial of low-pressure carbon dioxide-elicited pneumoperitoneum versus abdominal wall lifting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized study of closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery. Prospective randomized trial of heated humidified versus cold dry carbon dioxide insufflation during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Heated and humidified insufflation during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: effect on temperature, postoperative pain, and recovery outcomes. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Randomized clinical trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity. Radially expanding trocar: a less painful alternative for laparoscopic surgery. Randomized clinical trial comparing blunt tapered and standard needles in closing abdominal fascia.
Complications associated with initial abdominal entry are a prime concern for laparoscopic surgeons. In order to minimize first access-related complications in laparoscopy, several techniques and technologies have been introduced in the past years. This investigation compares two laparoscopic access techniques.
                194 women underwent laparoscopic surgery for simple ovarian cysts: 93 were assigned to direct optical access (DOA) abdominal entry (group I), and 101 women to classical closed method by Verres needle, pneumoperitoneum and trocar entry (group II). The following parameters were compared: time required for entry into abdomen, occurrence of vascular and/or bowel injury, blood loss. The results were analyzed using SAS software. p-value<0.05 was considered as significant.
                No statistically significant differences were observed in the occurrence of blood loss and minor vascular injury between the two techniques, as well as minor bowel injuries; time for of abdominal entry, instead, were significantly reduced in the DOA group.
                The results of the preliminary comparison between the DOA and the Verres methods, commonly used by gynecologists, suggests that the visual entry system confers a statistical advantage over closed entry technique with Verres needle, in terms of time saving and due to the minor vascular and bowel injuries, thus enabling a safe and expeditious, visually-guided, entry for surgeons.
                2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Nonobese patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures present a dilemma as to the correct mode of entry into the abdominal cavity because the Veress needle (VN) technique seems to be associated with a high risk of vascular and visceral injuries. Direct trocar insertion (DTI) has been reported as an alternative to the VN for creation of the pneumoperitoneum.
                An open comparative randomized prospective study was conducted on the feasibility and safety of DTI vs the VN technique in nonobese patients of any age category referred for urgent or scheduled laparoscopic procedures. Exclusion criteria were obesity (defined as a body mass index [BMI] > 27 kg/m(2)), major abdominal distension, and two or more previous abdominal operations. The study endpoints were the feasibility and safety of the DTI and VN techniques. Results were evaluated on an intention-to-treat basis. Statistical analysis was carried out with the t-test for independent samples, the chi-square tests, and the Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate. The level of significance was 0.01.
                Since January 2002, a total of 598 nonobese patients have been entered into the current trial; 46% (mean BMI 21.6 A+/- 4.4 kg/m(2)) were randomly allocated to DTI, whereas 54% (BMI 21.1 A+/- 5.3 kg/m(2)) were allocated to the VN techniques. Demographic features and type of procedures were similar for the two groups. DTI was feasible in 100% of patients vs 98.7% in the VN group (p = NS). Minor complications were nil in the DTI group and 5.9% in the VN group (p < 0.01). The latter group consisted of 11 cases (3.4%) of subcutaneous emphysema and eight cases (2.5%) of extraperitoneal insufflation. Major complications were nil in the DTI group and 1.3% among VN patients (p = NS). These latter cases consisted of two (0.3%) hepatic lesions managed laparoscopically; one (0.3%) misdiagnosed ileal perforation requiring reintervention, and one (0.3%) mesenteric laceration treated conservatively.
                In thin and very thin patients of any age category with no more than one previous abdominal operation, DTI is a safe alternative to the VN technique and is associated with fewer minor complications. In terms of major complications, there is no difference between the two techniques. Either technique of access is acceptable Thin and very thin patients undergoing laparoscopy, on condition that the basic principles of laparoscopic surgery are complied with. Sharp trocar insertion for laparoscopic procedures carries with it increased risk for vascular and visceral complications and incisional hernia. In a trial, which randomized 87 patients to treatment with either sharp trocars or a radially expanding needle system with blunt dilator, results showed that with the latter system there was statistically improved patient assessment of pain, a lower complications rate, and shorter procedure time. In the group of patients randomized to treatment with conventional trocars, there were a total of six instrument-related adverse events (6/42): four cases (five incidences) of abdominal wall injuries and one small bowel perforation caused by a Veress needle. Of the 45 patients randomized to the blunt dilator/cannula treatment, there was one adverse event (1/45) that was unrelated to the blunt dilator/cannula system: Veress needle injury to abdominal vasculature. The radially expanding access system demonstrates statistically improved patient postoperative comfort and improved patient safety. To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new closed parallel technique of Veress needle insertion and to compare this method with the conventional closed approach.
                Sequential, randomized, prospective, single-blind clinical trial.
                University hospital.
                Women undergoing elective diagnostic and/or operative laparoscopy. Subjects (n = 200) were assigned randomly to undergo the conventional closed method (group 1; n = 100) or the new parallel technique (group 2; n = 100) of Veress needle insertion.
                Randomization of the patients was performed in the operating room. The investigator performed both diagnostic and operative laparoscopy in both study groups.
                Safety and effectiveness of the needle insertion technique.
                There were no significant differences in demographics between the groups, or in the time required for Veress needle insertion to establish pneumoperitoneum. There were no nonlethal major or minor intraoperative complications associated with either laparoscopic approach.
                There is no significant disadvantage to the parallel technique of Veress pneumoperitoneum needle insertion compared with the conventional closed approach. This new technique avoids the anatomic location of large vessels during insertion and may serve as a safeguard to decrease the potential for lethal laceration of a major vessel. A randomized, prospective trial was designed to compare direct trocar insertion with prior peritoneal insufflation with a Verres needle for laparoscopic tubal sterilization. Direct trocar insertion resulted in fewer instrument insertions (21.8% vs. 7.8%) and use of smaller volumes of CO2 (2.67 vs. 2.32 L). Direct trocar use resulted in a decrease in operating time from 9 minutes, 40 seconds in the needle group to 7 minutes, 30 seconds in the trocar group. Minor omental injuries occurred in a small percentage of each group, while serious complications occurred once in each group. Two hundred and fifty-two women scheduled to undergo laparoscopy were randomly assigned to a Verres needle or direct insertion group. The groups were similar with respect to incidence of obesity, prior surgical treatment, indication for operation and level of training of the surgeon performing the procedure. There were no major complications associated with either technique. Minor complications (preperitoneal insufflation, failed entry or more than three attempts necessary to enter the peritoneal cavity with the trocar) were significantly more frequent (p < 0.05) in the Verres needle technique group. One hundred and thirteen of these patients underwent sterilization procedures. The mean times for performance of the laparoscopic procedure using the direct insertion and Verres needle techniques was 15.3 and 19.6 minutes, respectively. The time saved using the direct insertion technique is explained by a significant (p < 0.01) reduction in the mean laparoscope insertion time, which was 2.2 minutes and 5.9 minutes for the direct insertion and Verres needle techniques, respectively. We prefer the direct insertion technique for trocar placement because it has fewer minor complications and requires less operating time. To compare direct trocar (DT) to Veress needle (VN) entry for the creation of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy with regard to the duration of the procedure, volume of gas used, ease of performance, and frequency of complications.
                A randomized clinical trial. Subjects and
                One thousand patients scheduled to undergo diagnostic laparoscopy were recruited for the study. They were randomly allocated to either DT entry (group A, n = 500) or VN (group B, n = 500) for pneumoperitoneum. The laparoscopic procedures were performed by the same surgeon.
                The duration of the procedure, volume of gas consumption, ease of performance and frequency of complications were analyzed.
                Patients in the 2 groups had similar demographic characteristics. The mean duration of the procedure was significantly shorter in group A (2.2 +/- 0.7 min, 95% CI 2.14-2.26) than in group B (8.2 +/- 1.4 min, 95% CI 8.08-8.32; p < 0.0001). The mean gas consumption was significantly less in group A (2.6 +/- 0.9 liters, 95% CI 2.52-2.68) than in group B (8.4 +/- 2.6 liters, 95% CI 8.17-8.63; p < 0.0001). No major complications in both groups were encountered. Minor complications were significantly less in group A (0.4%, 95% CI 0.77-3.23) than in group B (14%, 95% CI 10.96-17.04; p < 0.0001).
                DT entry is a safe alternative to the VN entry technique for the creation of pneumoperitoneum. Such an approach has further advantages such as less cost and instrumentation and rapid creation of pneumoperitoneum.
                Copyright (c) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel. To present a single centre prospective randomized study on the use of the bladeless Optiview system (Ethicon Endosurgery, Cincinnati, OH) to create the pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic renal procedures reporting the results with regards safety, efficacy and complications and comparing it with the Hasson open technique.
                Sixty patients were randomly recruited, 27 to the open and 33 to the bladeless group at the Bristol Urological Institute, UK. Time to insertion, time to closure and any intraoperative and postoperative complication related to trocar insertion was recorded.
                All procedures were performed for renal pathology. BMI values were similar in both groups. The mean time to insertion of the 12 mm Hasson and Bladeless trocars were 443 and 125 seconds, respectively (p < 0.0001). The incision in the bladeless group was only closed when the defect exceeded 12 mm (38%) or extended for specimen removal (23%), resulting in a mean time to closure of 203 seconds. In the Hasson group, entry into the abdominal cavity could not be confirmed in two patients (7.4%) due to multiple adhesions. In the Bladeless group, there was one failed placement (3%) requiring conversion to the Hasson technique and two injuries to intraabdominal structures (peritoneal minor bruising, liver injury requiring conversion to open procedure, 6%), There was one incidence of gas leakage (3%). There were no reports of port site herniation at a mean follow up of 9 months.
                Direct placement of a bladeless trocar under direct vision in a desufflated abdomen can reduce port placement time when compared to the Hasson technique. The benefits are maximised by using the bladeless trocar for procedures not requiring intact specimen removal. However, despite visualisation of tissue layers, this port cannot prevent serious intra abdominal injuries that can occur in a higher percentage of cases in comparison to the Hasson technique. To compare postoperative wound pain associated with the radially expanding access device and the conventional disposable cutting-tip trocar.
                Our randomized, double-masked, self-controlled study involved 34 women scheduled for laparoscopic adnexal surgery. In each, a 10-mm radially expanding access device was inserted laterally on one side of the lower abdomen and a size-matched disposable cutting-tip trocar was placed on the other side, using random assignment. Postoperative pain for each studied wound and patient satisfaction toward the wounds were assessed using a visual analog scale. Any bleeding complication associated with insertion of the trocar was also recorded.
                The radially expanding access device was associated with significant reduction in severity (median 1.4 versus 5.0, P <.001) and duration (median 11 versus 21 days, P <.001) of postoperative wound pain, shorter wound scars (14 versus 17 mm, P <.001), a lower incidence of wound induration (0 versus 9, P <.01), and a higher patient satisfaction (median 9.7 versus 6.2, P <.001). There were four inferior epigastric artery injuries, all at the conventional trocar wound.
                The radially expanding access device was associated with less postoperative wound pain and more patient satisfaction than the conventional cutting-tip trocar. The missile trocar was developed for smooth abdominal penetration of the primary port. It contains a longitudinal tunnel connecting the abdominal cavity with the outside.
                To evaluate the efficacy of the missile trocar compared with the traditional method using the Veress needle.
                The times required to enter the abdominal cavity and the difficulty of the procedure were compared with the traditional Veress needle. A blind technique was used on 100 consecutive patients in a randomized fashion.
                The missile trocar technique took 2.7 +/- 1.6 minutes to perform compared with 3.9 +/- 1.3 min in the Veress needle group (p = 0.001), and the difficulty of the procedure was 2.1 +/- 1.9 cm (p = 0.433) rated from 10-cm scale. No carbon dioxide leakage or serious complications occurred in any patient.
                The results of the present study indicate that a long-tip missile trocar technique may be used safely when the technique is fully understood. This procedure is a relatively quick alternative approach for laparoscopy. To compare three techniques of establishment of pneumoperitoneum for efficacy: the Veress needle/first trocar, the Hasson trocar, and a newly developed modified blunt trocar, the TrocDoc.
                Between June and December 1999, 62 patients eligible for laparoscopic surgery were randomized. The effectiveness of installation of the pneumoperitoneum using the three techniques was assessed by time-motion analysis. Primary efficacy measures were total time and number of actions required to establish the pneumoperitoneum. Secondary efficacy measures were procedure-related complications, wound complications, and occurrence of CO2 leakage.
                Two patients were withdrawn from inclusion. The three groups were comparable for age and body mass index. Total time was shortest using the TrocDoc rather than the Veress needle/first trocar and the Hasson trocar (respectively, 138 +/- 58 v 237 +/- 56 v 350 +/- 103 seconds), and the number of actions was lowest for the Veress needle/first trocar combination: 22 +/- 7 v 32 +/- 12 (TrocDoc) v 53 +/- 17 (Hasson). There was no morbidity related to the installation of pneumoperitoneum nor trocar wound complications. Gas leakage occurred in five of the Hasson introductions.
                Establishment of the pneumoperitoneum is more efficient using the TrocDoc compared with the Veress needle/first trocar and the Hasson trocar. The TrocDoc might replace the two alternatives because of its efficacy and open method of introduction. Trocar injury is one of the most serious and potentially preventable complications of laparoscopic surgery. Use of a blunt rather than a cutting trocar could be expected to lessen the likelihood of this injury. Therefore complications related to laparoscopic port design were studied by comparing conventional cutting trocars with radially expanding (blunt) trocars. A multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 250 adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic procedures at tertiary care centers and community hospitals. The patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group C, conventional cutting trocars; or group S, radially expanding trocars. Sixteen surgeons performed 244 elective laparoscopic procedures; six patients were removed from the study. One hundred nineteen patients were assigned to group S and 125 to group C. The groups were similar with regard to age, sex, and type of procedure. The following data were collected: intraoperative complications related to the trocars, abdominal wall bleeding, visceral or vascular injury, other complications, fascial closure, procedure time, trocar site assessment at 4 and 24 hours postoperatively, and visual analog pain scores at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Fascial defects from 10 mm or larger trocars in group C were closed; the fascial defects in group S were not closed. The trocar sites were checked for incisional hernias at late follow-up. Mean operating time was not different between the two groups (group S, 92 +/- 73 minutes; group C, 100 +/- 74 minutes). There were no episodes of intraoperative cannula site bleeding in group S compared with 16 episodes in 13 patients (P < 0.001) in group C. Postoperative wound complications were fewer in group S (13 vs. 23; P < 0.05). Although the pain scores were generally lower in group S, the differences were not significant. Only 3% of the patients in group S had fascial defects of 10 mm or greater that had to be closed. Within a follow-up period of 6 to 18 months, there have been no incisional hernias in either group. This study shows that radially expanding trocars are safe and effective, and less likely than conventional trocars to result in intraoperative or postoperative complications. The defects created by the radially expanding trocars do not have to be routinely closed. Because induction of artificial pneumoperitoneum through the infra-umbilical route is associated with complications in laparoscopic procedures, especially in obese patients, we performed a prospective randomized study comparing the conventional infra-umbilical route with a transfundal route, in which the Veress needle is inserted into the peritoneal cavity through the uterine fundus. One hundred obese subjects (body mass index >/=25 kg/m(2)) scheduled for laparoscopic sterilization were randomized into two groups. In the infra-umbilical group pneumoperitoneum was achieved at a ratio (punctures/pneumoperitoneum) of 56/49 (1.14). There was one failure in this group. In the transfundal group the ratio was 53/51 (1.04). There was no clinically significant bleeding in either of the groups; nor were there any major complications. One subject in whom the infra-umbilical route failed was moved to the transfundal group. This subject also underwent dilatation and curettage at the time of laparoscopy. Postoperatively she contracted chlamydial pelvic inflammatory disease. No other infections were detected postoperatively in either of the groups. In conclusion, the transfundal route of inducing artificial pneumoperitoneum proved to be easy, safe and effective. This prospective randomized controlled trial examined the effect of an "alveolar recruitment strategy" (ARS) in healthy patients having laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Twenty-four consecutive ASA 1 or 2 patients were randomly allocated to an ARS or control group. All patients were manually ventilated to a maximal airway pressure of 25 to 30 cmH2O or a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg during induction of general anaesthesia. After intubation, the control group was ventilated with standardized mechanical ventilation settings. The ARS group was manually ventilated to an airway pressure of 40 cmH2O for 10 breaths over one minute, followed by mechanical ventilation with similar standardized settings plus 5 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure. Blood pressure, heart rate, arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide tension (PaO2 and PaCO2) was measured pre-induction, 20 minutes post induction but before abdominal insufflation, 20 minutes after abdominal insufflation, and 20 minutes after arrival in the recovery room. Demographic and operation data were similar. The ARS group pre-insufflation PaO2 [30.16 (9.43)] was higher than the control group [22.19 (9.08)] (P = 0.047). There was a significant difference in PaO2 between the ARS [23.94 (4.87)] and control [17.26 (3.93)] groups during the post-insufflation period (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in PaO2 between the groups during baseline and recovery periods. No adverse effects were reported. ARS improved arterial oxygenation intraoperatively in healthy patients having laparoscopic cholecystectomy, without clinical cardiovascular compromise or respiratory complication. We conclude that this alveolar recruitment strategy is a useful method of increasing arterial oxygenation. Traditional trocar tip design for laparoscopic access incorporates cutting blades to penetrate the body wall. More recently, trocars applying tissue dilation have been used that create a smaller defect, seldom requiring fascial wound closure. Four 12-mm commercially available single-use trocar designs were evaluated for postoperative pain.
                The 4-trocar types included 2 cutting (single or pyramidal bladed) and 2 dilating trocars (radially or axially dilating) type. Fifty-six patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic renal surgery were randomized and blinded to one of the 4 trocar types. In each case, trocars were placed in a standard "diamond" configuration: three 12-mm study trocars and a lateral 5-mm trocar that served as a reference point for normalizing patients' pain scores. Postoperative pain based on a visual analog scale and complications were assessed.
                No statistically significant difference existed in pain scores between different trocar types or trocar sites at 3-hour, 24-hour, and 1-week postoperative assessment time points. Eight (4.8%) minor complications occurred: bleeding in 7 (4.2%) and 1 (0.6%) wound infection. The radially dilating trocar had more device malfunction (P<0.05) than did the others.
                All 4 disposable trocars, muscle cutting or dilating type, were safe and yielded similar postoperative pain scores with or without the fascial wound closure after renal laparoscopy. Carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum effects are still controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate cardiopulmonary changes in patients subjected to different surgical procedures for cholecystectomy.
                In this study, 15 patients were assigned randomly to three groups according to the surgical procedure to be used: open cholecystectomy (OC), CO2 pneumoperitoneum cholecystectomy (PP), and laparoscopic gasless cholecystectomy (abdominal wall lifting [AWL]), respectively. A pulmonary artery catheter was used for hemodynamic monitoring in all patients. A subcutaneous multiplanar device (Laparo Tenser) was used for abdominal wall lifting. To avoid misinterpretation of results, conventional anesthesia was performed with all parameters, and the position of the patients held fixed throughout surgery. The following parameters were analyzed: mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), central venous pressure (CVP), systemic vascular resistances index (SVRI), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), pulmonary vascular resistances index (PVRI), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), end-tidal CO2 pressure (ETCO)2, CO2 arterial pressure (PaCO2), and arterial pH.
                All the operations were completed successfully. The Laparo Tenser allowed good exposition of the surgical field. A slight impairment of the cardiopulmonary functions, with reduction of SVRI, MAP, and CI and elevation of pulmonary pressures and vascular resistance, followed induction of anesthesia. However, these effects tended to normalize in the OC and AWL groups over time. In contrast, CO2 insufflation produced a complex hemodynamic and pulmonary syndrome resulting in increased right- and left side filling pressures, significant cardiac index reduction, derangement of the respiratory mechanics, and respiratory acidosis. All of these effects normalized after desufflation.
                Cardiopulmonary adverse effects of general anesthesia were significant but transitory and normalized during surgery. Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum caused a significant impairment in cardiopulmonary functions. In high-risk patients, gasless laparoscopy may be preferred for reliability and absence of cardiopulmonary alterations. Internal jugular venous catheters (IJVC) for hemodialysis are a commonly employed temporary vascular access for hemodialysis. Most hospitals still follow the use of blind technique, which uses anatomical landmarks. Even in the most experienced hands this procedure has a variable success rate. Ultrasound guidance can decrease the incidence of periprocedural complications and improve the success rate. In this randomized study we compared the procedure success rate and periprocedural complications in patients undergoing ultrasound guided vs. nonultrasound guided IJVC insertion for a temporary hemodialysis access.
                All patients subjected to insertion of an IJVC between March 2004 and June 2004 were enrolled into the study, randomized to either the blind (group A) or ultrasound guided (group B) procedure, which uses a portable ordinary ultrasound machine without a needle guide. The aseptic Saldinger technique was used for catheterization in both the groups. Baseline characteristics of patient and periprocedural events were recorded.
                A total of 60 patients were randomized, 30 patients each in two groups. First attempt venous cannulation success rate was 56.7% in group A compared to 86.7% in group B. Chance of occurrence of adverse outcome was significantly more in the blind procedure (P=0.020). A post-procedure chest radiograph done in all patient showed no complications.
                Ultrasound guided procedure for internal jugular vein catheter insertion using an ordinary ultrasound machine was significantly safer and more successful as compared to the blind technique. Two alternative surgical techniques for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), low-pressure insufflation of the peritoneal cavity and abdominal wall lifting (AWL), have been developed over time to minimize the disadvantages associated with CO2-elicited pneumoperitoneum. To the best of our knowledge, the 2 methods have seldom been compared as regards their relative advantages and disadvantages.
                Eighty patients scheduled for elective LC were randomized into either a low-pressure (8 mmHg) CO2 insufflation method (LPLC) group, or a gasless technique using a subcutaneous abdominal wall lifting device (GLC group). The duration of the surgical procedure, the surgical results including level of postoperative pain, and perioperative cardiopulmonary function changes experienced by the members of both groups were compared.
                Laparoscopic surgery was completed for all but 1 patient from each group due to an inadequate surgical-site exposure. There was no mortality for study participants, and no major complications were noted for members of either group. The LPLC group evidenced a shorter surgical duration as compared to the GLC group (77 +/- 28 minutes vs. 98 +/- 27 minutes, respectively; p < 0.01) and a lower incidence of postoperative shoulder pain (2/38 vs. 8/39, respectively; p < 0.05), although significant differences in intraoperative pulmonary function were noted (an increased PaCO2, Pet CO2 and peak-airway pressure and decreased arterial blood pH; p < 0.01) for the LPLC group compared to the GLC group.
                Both alternative methods for this type of surgery appeared feasible and safe for LC. Low-pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum had a shorter surgical duration and less postoperative shoulder pain compared to the GLC technique, but did not feature any other advantage over the AWL technique with regard to impact on cardiopulmonary function. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that nonclosure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum during low transverse cervical cesarean delivery is not associated with increased intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. One hundred thirteen patients scheduled for low transverse cervical cesarean were randomized to either closure of both the visceral and parietal peritoneum with absorbable suture (N = 59) or no peritoneal closure (N = 54). Patients were cared for in the usual postoperative manner without reference to treatment group. There were no demographic differences between the groups and no differences in method(s) of anesthesia, operative indication(s), or use of peripartum epidural narcotics. The incidence of fever, endometritis, or wound infection was similar between groups. There were no differences in the number of patients requiring parenteral narcotic analgesia or in the number of doses per patient. The number of oral analgesic doses was significantly greater with closure than without (P = .014). The frequency with which postoperative ileus was diagnosed in each group was similar, and there was no difference regarding the day on which patients were advanced to liquid or select diets. Bowel stimulants were administered more frequently to the closure than to non-closure patients (P = .03). The average operating time was shorter for the open group than for the closure group (P less than .005). We conclude that non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at low transverse cervical cesarean delivery appears to have no adverse effect on immediate postoperative recovery, may decrease postoperative narcotic requirements, allows less complicated return of bowel function, and provides a simplified and shorter surgical procedure. The replacement of cold dry carbon dioxide with heated humidified gas for insufflation during complex laparoscopic procedures has been reported to decrease hypothermia and peritoneal cell desiccation, with a resultant decrease in postoperative pain and narcotic use and a shortened recovery, but may prevent the paralysis of the peritoneal polymorphonuclear cell cytokine cascade and add to the cost of the procedure. We report our outcomes comparing carbon dioxide insufflation with different characteristics during laparoscopic gastric bypass.
                Fifty consecutive patients were randomized to undergo laparoscopic gastric bypass with either cold-dry or heated-humidified carbon dioxide insufflation. Statistical analysis of variance between groups was determined by Levine's t test with the Greenhouse-Geisser correction, at a significance level of P <.05.
                The two groups were similar for preoperative gender, age, weight, body mass index, and baseline C-reactive protein. The intraoperative room and patient core temperature, liters of insufflation used, lens cleanings, operating time, recovery room time, and narcotics used were not significantly different. The postoperative subjective analog shoulder pain score was significantly less (P = .025) for the heated-humidified group at 18 hours, but not at 6, 12, 24, or 48 hours. The abdominal pain scores and overall narcotic use, postoperative C-reactive protein, and length of stay were not significantly different between the two groups.
                Heated-humidified insufflation resulted in a transient reduction in subjective shoulder pain at 18 hours postoperatively, but no reduction in abdominal pain or narcotics used. We were unable to verify any clinically significant difference between the two groups comparing heated-humidified and cold-dry insufflation after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Controversy exists regarding the efficacy of heated and humidified intraperitoneal gases in maintaining core body temperature. We performed a sham-controlled study to test the hypothesis that active warming and humidification of the insufflation gas reduces intraoperative heat loss and improves recovery outcomes.
                Fifty morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures using a standardized anesthetic technique were randomly assigned to either a control (sham) group receiving room temperature insufflation gases with an inactive Insuflow (Lexion Medical, St. Paul, MN) device, or an active (Insuflow) group receiving warmed and humidified intraperitoneal gases. Esophageal and/or tympanic membrane temperature was measured perioperatively. Postoperative pain was assessed at 15 minute intervals using an 11-point verbal rating scale, with 0 = none to 10 = maximal. In addition, postoperative opioid requirements, incidence of nausea and vomiting, as well as the quality of recovery, were recorded.
                Use of the active Insuflow device was associated with significantly higher mean +/- standard deviation (SD) intraoperative core body temperatures (35.5 +/- 0.5 vs. 35.0 +/- 0.4 degrees C). Postoperative shivering (0 vs. 19%) and the requirement for morphine in the postanesthesia care unit (5 +/- 4 vs. 10 +/- 5 mg) were both significantly lower in the Insuflow vs. control groups. Patients in the Insuflow group also reported a higher quality of recovery 48 hours after surgery (15 vs. 13, P < 0.05).
                The Insuflow device modestly reduced shivering and heat loss, as well as the need for opioid analgesics in the early postoperative period. However, it failed to improve laparoscopic visualization due to fogging, and provided improvement in the quality of recovery only on postoperative day 2. The objectives of this study were to compare both subjective clinical outcomes and the objective stress response of laparoscopic and open abdominal rectopexy in patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse. Abdominal rectopexy for patients with rectal prolapse is well suited for a laparoscopic approach as no resection or anastomosis is necessary.
                Forty patients with a full-thickness rectal prolapse were randomized before operation to a laparoscopic group and an open group. They agreed to conform to a clinical pathway (CP) of liquid diet (CP1) and full mobility (CP2) on day 1, solid diet (CP3) on day 2 and discharge (CP4) before day 5. Their compliance was monitored by an assessor blinded to the operative group, who also rated pain and mobility. Patient-controlled morphine use was documented. Neuroendocrine and immune stress response and respiratory function were measured.
                Some 75 per cent of all clinical pathway objectives of early recovery were achieved in the laparoscopic group compared with 37 per cent in the open group (P < 0.01). Significant differences in favour of laparoscopy were noted with regard to narcotic requirements, and pain and mobility scores. Differences in objective measures of stress response favouring laparoscopy were found for urinary catecholamines, interleukin 6, serum cortisol and C-reactive protein. No differences were noted in respiratory function but significant respiratory morbidity was greater in the open group (P < 0.05). None of the measured outcomes, subjective or objective, favoured the open group apart from operating time, which was significantly shorter (153 versus 102 min; P < 0.01).
                This study has demonstrated significant subjective and objective differences in favour of a laparoscopic technique for abdominal rectopexy. The advantages were all short term but no evidence of any adverse effect on longer-term outcomes was observed. : Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) has increased in popularity since the introduction of the laparoscopic procedure, but this approach requires extensive surgical skill and the learning curve is steep. The present study examined the suitability of hand-assisted laparoscopy for RYGBP.
                In a prospective trial, 50 patients (median age 38 years, body mass index 45 kg/m(2)) were randomized to either hand-assisted (n = 25) or open (n = 25) RYGBP. The hand-assisted device was introduced through a right subcostal incision. Laparoscopic staplers were also used in the open group, allowing a short upper midline incision. The gastrojejunostomy was made by means of a circular stapler and the Roux limb placed behind the colon and excluded stomach.
                The postoperative outcome, with respect to morphine consumption, complications, hospital stay (6 days) and weight loss, was similar in the two groups. The operating time was significantly longer in the hand-assisted group (150 versus 85 min; P < 0.001) but there was no conversion to open operation. One patient in the hand-assisted group was reoperated owing to leakage and one patient developed an incisional hernia after open RYGBP.
                The hand-assisted technique was feasible and allowed good working conditions in all patients. However, the postoperative outcome was excellent in both groups and there was no advantage to the hand-assisted technique.
                Copyright 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. One advantage of minimal-access surgery is that it produces less pain. A radially expanding trocar has been claimed to reduce pain further. We aimed to evaluate this claim.
                This was a randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial. Fifty-four patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong, between July 1997 and September 1998 were randomized into either the study group or the control group. The radially expanding 10-mm trocar was used for the epigastric port in the study group. The conventional 10-mm metal trocar was used similarly in the control group. The operation was otherwise performed with a standardized technique. Another conventional 10-mm metal trocar was used for the subumbilical port for all patients. Pain was measured using a visual analog scale. Pain scores for the epigastric port and subumbilical port were documented for 3 days after the surgery.
                There was no difference in age, sex, diagnoses, operating time, or conversion rate. There was consistently no difference in the pain experienced in the subumbilical wound, whereas pain at the epigastric wound was consistently less with the radially expanding trocar (p < 0.05).
                The radially expanding trocar produces less early postoperative pain than the conventional metal trocar. Glove perforation frequently occurs during the course of surgical procedures, introducing risks for both surgeons and patients. The aim of this study was to compare the use of blunt tapered and "sharp" needles during abdominal wall closure with respect to the incidence of glove perforation and the convenience of needle handling. A series of 200 patients undergoing laparotomy in a 6-month period for general surgical disorders were randomized to two groups; in one, the abdominal fascia was closed with a blunt tapered needle; in the other, a sharp needle was used. The main outcome measures were glove perforation and convenience of handling the needle. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. In all, 56 glove perforations occurred during 40 (20%) surgical procedures. Perforation rates differed significantly: 12% for the blunt (n = 100) tapered needle and 28% (n = 100) for the sharp needle (p = 0.003). Only in 12 cases (21%) was the glove perforation detected at surgery. The type of needle (odds ratio 0.35, p = 0.006) and time taken to close the fascia (odds ratio 1.001, p = 0.05) significantly affected the risk of glove perforation. At multivariate logistic regression analysis the type of needle (odds ratio 0.23, p = 0.004) and the visual analog linear scale (VAS) for ease of needle handling (odds ratio 1.18, p = 0.019) were important predictive factors for glove perforation. With the blunt tapered needle, the VAS was significantly (p = 0.0003) higher at primary laparotomy than at relaparotomy. Use of the blunt tapered needle reduces the incidence of glove perforation. Laborious closure predicts glove perforation. Blunt tapered needles are less convenient in closing a scarred abdominal fascia.
An open-entry technique is associated with a significant reduction in failed entry when compared to a closed-entry technique, with no difference in the incidence of visceral or vascular injury. 
Significant benefits were noted with the use of a direct-entry technique when compared to the Veress Needle. The use of the Veress Needle was associated with an increased incidence of failed entry, extraperitoneal insufflation and omental injury; direct-trocar entry is therefore a safer closed-entry technique.
The low rate of reported complications associated with laparoscopic entry and the small number of participants within the included studies may account for the lack of significant difference in terms of major vascular and visceral injury between entry techniques. Results should be interpreted with caution for outcomes where only single studies were included.