Acute operative stabilization versus nonoperative management of clavicle fractures. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures-a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Operative treatment of midclavicular fractures in 62 elderly patients: knowles pin versus plate. Sling compared with plate osteosynthesis for treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a randomized clinical trial. Comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment methods in the management of comminuted fractures of the clavicle.
We conducted a prospective, randomized study to determine if patients with midshaft clavicle fractures would benefit from immediate operative stabilization with a modified Hagie pin in comparison with a matched group treated with nonoperative therapy. At a level II trauma center, patients with closed midshaft clavicle fractures were prospectively randomized to receive either operative or nonoperative treatment. Fifty-seven (29 operative, 28 nonoperative) patients were enrolled in the study. Operative patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation of the clavicle using a modified Hagie pin; nonoperative patients were treated with a sling for comfort. All patients were followed at regular intervals for 1 year. They were evaluated for radiographic healing and complications and were scored with the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and L'Insalata instruments. Injury severities and radiographs were not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. Functional scores in the operative group were slightly higher at 3 weeks, and the nonoperative group had slightly higher scores at 6 months and 1 year. The only statistically significant difference between the groups was at 3 weeks. Percentage follow-up at 1 year was 93% for the operative group and 82% for the nonoperative group. One patient in each group developed a nonunion, and 1 patient in each group had a refracture. Complications were higher in the operative group, and most were related to pin prominence at the posterior shoulder. Results of this study suggest that, though patients with midshaft clavicle fractures had higher functional scores at short-term follow-up after internal fixation, functional scores were similar at 6 months and 1 year. In addition, internal fixation with a modified Hagie pin was associated with a higher complication rate. To compare elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) with nonoperative treatment of fully displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in adults.
                The study was a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.
                Level 1 trauma center.
                Sixty patients between 18 and 65 years of age participated and completed the study. They were randomized to either operative or nonoperative treatment with a 2-year follow-up.
                Thirty patients were treated with a simple shoulder sling and 30 patients with ESIN within 3 days after trauma.
                Complications after operative and nonoperative treatments, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and Constant Shoulder Score for outcome measurement, and clavicular shortening.
                Fracture union was achieved in all patients in the operative group, whereas nonunion was observed in 3 of 30 patients of the nonoperative group. Two symptomatic malunions required corrective osteotomy in the nonoperative group. Medial nail protrusion occurred in 7 cases in the operative group. Implant failure with revision surgery was necessary in 2 patients after an additional adequate trauma. DASH scores were lower in the operative group throughout the first 6 months and 2 years after trauma, with a significant difference during the first 18 weeks. Constant scores were significantly higher after 6 months and 2 years after intramedullary stabilization. Patients in the operative group showed a significant improvement of posttraumatic clavicular shortening; they were also more satisfied with cosmetic appearance and overall outcome.
                ESIN of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures resulted in a lower rate of nonunion and delayed union, a faster return to daily activities, and a better functional outcome. Clavicular shortening was significantly lower, and overall satisfaction was higher in the operative group. This prospective, randomized trial compared treatment with Knowles pins and plates in 62 elderly patients (>50 years) with midclavicular fractures. The clinical outcomes were evaluated at 30 months postoperatively. The mean shoulder score of the Knowles pinning was 85 points and the plating was 84 points (P=.7). Knowles pinning requires significantly shorter operative time (P<.001), smaller wound size (P<.001), shorter hospital stay P=.03), less meperidine use (P=.02), lower complication rate (P=0.04), and less symptomatic hardware (P=.015). If surgery of mid-third clavicular fractures is indicated, fixation with a Knowles pin has more advantages than plate fixation in elderly patients. Few randomized controlled trials have compared operative with nonoperative treatment of clavicular fractures.
                Patients with displaced midshaft clavicular fractures were randomized either to nonoperative treatment with a sling or to operative treatment with a stainless steel 3.5-mm reconstruction plate. Outcome measures were the Constant shoulder score, DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score, pain, fracture-healing, and complications. The null hypothesis was that the Constant and DASH scores would not differ between the groups at the one-year follow-up evaluation.
                In accordance with the power analysis, we included sixty patients in the study; thirty-two were randomized to the nonoperative group and twenty-eight to the operative group. We found no difference in the Constant score (p = 0.75), the DASH score (p = 0.89), or pain (p = 0.98) between the groups at the one-year follow-up evaluation. All fractures in the operative group healed, but six nonunions (24%) occurred in the nonoperative group.
                One year after a displaced midshaft clavicular fracture, nonoperative treatment resulted in a higher nonunion rate but similar function and disability compared with operative treatment. To evaluate the outcome and satisfaction of closed treatment versus open reduction and internal fixation in comminuted clavicular fractures.
                Sixty patients with displaced clavicular fractures were randomized into operative (29 patients) and nonoperative (31 patients) groups. Three patients in the operative group did not accept the surgery, and seven patients in the nonoperative group did not complete the one-year follow-up. Outcomes were assessed using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Constant shoulder score, specific questions regarding patients' final satisfaction, physical examination, measurement of the shortening of the clavicular length, and plain radiographs.
                There was one nonunion in the operative group and one in the nonoperative group. The nonunion in operative group was the result of the only infection in this group. Four malunions were developed in the operative group and nineteen malunions in the nonoperative treatment, (p<0.001). Three patients in the operative group were completely dissatisfied with their treatment. Eighteen patients in the nonoperative group were partially satisfied. Pain was the main reason for dissatisfaction in this group. The mean shortening of the clavicle was 26.5 mm in the nonoperative group and 4.0 mm in the operative group. The mean DASH score for the operative and nonoperative groups were 8.6 and 21.3, respectively (p<0.001); and the Constant shoulder scores were 89.8 and 78.8 (p<0.001).
                Open reduction and internal fixation of comminuted fractures of the clavicle using a reconstruction plate is an effective treatment modality. Despite the variety of complications, this method has a higher satisfaction rate than conservative treatment.
Limited evidence is available from randomised controlled trials on the relative effectiveness of surgical versus conservative treatment for acute middle third clavicle fractures. Treatment options must be chosen on an individual patient basis, after careful consideration of the relative benefits and harms of each intervention and of patient preferences.