Randomized, dim light controlled, crossover test of morning bright light therapy for rest-activity rhythm disorders in patients with vascular dementia and dementia of Alzheimer's type. The effects of light therapy on mini-mental state examination scores in demented patients. Efficacy of an evidence-based cognitive stimulation therapy programme for people with dementia: randomised controlled trial. Light treatment for neuropsychiatric behaviors in Alzheimer's disease. Dawn-dusk simulation light therapy of disturbed circadian rest-activity cycles in demented elderly. A randomized, controlled trial of bright light therapy for agitated behaviors in dementia patients residing in long-term care. Effect of light on agitation in institutionalized patients with severe Alzheimer disease. Phototherapy in nonseasonal depression. Controlled trial of bright light for nonseasonal major depressive disorders. Bright light therapy and/or imipramine for inpatients with recurrent non-seasonal depression.
The authors compared the therapeutic effect of morning bright and dim light exposure on rest-activity (R-A) rhythm disorders in patients with vascular dementia (VD) and patients with dementia of Alzheimer's type (DAT). Participants in this study were 12 patients with VD (M/F = 5/7; average age = 81 years) and 10 patients with DAT (M/F = 4/6; average age = 78 years). They were exposed to 2 weeks of bright light (BL; 5000-8000 lux) and 2 weeks of dim light (DL; 300 lux) in the morning (09:00-11:00) in a randomized crossover design in which the 2-week treatment period took place between pretreatment (1 week) and posttreatment (1 week) periods. Continuous R-A monitoring was performed at 1-minute intervals throughout the study using an actigraph around the nondominant wrist. The BL exposure for 2 weeks induced a significant reduction in both nighttime activity and percentages of nighttime activity to total activity compared with the pretreatment period, as well as compared with the DL condition in the VD group, but not in the DAT group. These findings support the assumption that the therapeutic efficacies of morning BL exposure are prominent in VD patients and are mainly due to its photic effect rather than nonphotic effects such as the intensification of social interaction accompanying light therapy. Preliminary evidence suggests that demented patients may experience beneficial effects of light therapy. The authors tested whether bright light therapy (BLT) is capable of improving cognitive functions in patients with Alzheimer-type dementia (AD) or vascular dementia (VD).
                Twenty-three patients with AD or VD were randomly assigned to either evening BLT or dim light therapy (DLT). Effects of light therapy on cognitive functions were assessed before and after light therapy using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Body temperature rhythm (BTR) was additionally recorded pre- and posttreatment.
                Irrespective of their diagnosis, patients treated with BLT (p =.0012) but not with DLT (p =.73) showed a statistically significant increase in MMSE total scores after light therapy. Evening BLT simultaneously induced a significant phase delay of 56 min on BTR (p =.025).
                Our preliminary results suggest that short-term evening BLT may exert beneficial effects on cognitive functioning in patients with dementia. A recent Cochrane review of reality orientation therapy identified the need for large, well-designed, multi-centre trials.
                To test the hypothesis that cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) for older people with dementia would benefit cognition and quality of life.
                A single-blind, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial recruited 201 older people with dementia. The main outcome measures were change in cognitive function and quality of life. An intention-to-treat analysis used analysis of covariance to control for potential variability in baseline measures.
                One hundred and fifteen people were randomised within centres to the intervention group and 86 to the control group. At follow-up the intervention group had significantly improved relative to the control group on the Mini-Mental State Examination (P=0.044), the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognition (ADAS-Cog) (P=0.014) and Quality of Life - Alzheimer's Disease scales (P=0.028). Using criteria of 4 points or more improvement on the ADAS-Cog the number needed to treat was 6 for the intervention group.
                The results compare favourably with trials of drugs for dementia. CST groups may have worthwhile benefits for many people with dementia. Neuropsychiatric behaviors are common in people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and make both professional and lay caregiving difficult. Light therapy has been somewhat successful in ameliorating disruptive behaviors. This randomized trial tested the effects of morning or afternoon bright light exposure compared with usual indoor light on the presence, frequency, severity, and occupational disruptiveness of neuropsychiatric behaviors in nursing home residents with AD. Light was administered for 1 hr daily (Monday-Friday) for 10 weeks. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home was used to assess behavior at baseline and end of the intervention. Analyses revealed statistically significant differences between groups on agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, aberrant motor behavior, and appetite/eating disorders. The magnitude of change was small and may not represent clinically significant findings. Agitation/aggression and nighttime behaviors commonly occurred and were highly correlated with occupational disruptiveness. Interventions that decrease the presence and/or severity of neuropsychiatric behaviors have the potential to significantly decrease caregiver burden. We investigated whether low intensity dawn-dusk simulation (DDS), a 'naturalistic' form of light therapy designed to embed sleep in its accustomed phase, could improve the disturbed circadian rest-activity cycle, nocturnal sleep and and/or cognitive functions in dementia. A protocol of 3 weeks each of baseline, treatment and follow-up was completed by 13 patients (85yr old+/-5yr, MMSE 14+/-5; n=9 DDS versus n=4 'placebo' dim red light) who wore an activity/lux monitor throughout. There were no significant changes in clinical or cognitive status, nor modification of circadian stability or amplitude characteristics of the rest-activity cycle. However, two aspects of sleep responded to DDS but not to dim red light. The main sleep episode was 1:14h earlier during treatment (p=0.03) compared with before and after DDS. With respect to actimetry-determined sleep variables, the DDS group tended to have shortened 'sleep latency', longer 'sleep duration', more nocturnal immobility and less nocturnal activity than the dim red group (p<0.1). In parallel, nighttime light exposure tended to be reduced (p=0.07). These promising findings-after only 3 weeks of light treatment in elderly patients with advanced dementia-suggest that the circadian timing system remains functionally responsive even to low intensity DDS light. Increasing zeitgeber strength is an important strategy for improving sleep quality and timing in dementia, and DDS light therapy may provide one of the appropriate means to do so. Agitated behaviors are common in dementia patients residing in chronic care settings. Their occurrence may be associated with lack of adequate exposure to sunlight and with circadian rhythm disturbances.
                Prior research has suggested that bright light therapy (BLT) may reduce agitated behaviors in dementia patients. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of BLT in a randomized, controlled, crossover clinical trial.
                Fifteen patients with dementia and agitated behaviors residing in a chronic care facility were randomized in a crossover design to morning BLT for 1 hour per day or to a control condition with dim light exposure. Patients were treated in either condition for 4 weeks, followed by 1 week on no treatment, prior to being crossed over to the other condition.
                Eight out of 15 patients completed the entire study. The rest completed at least 2 weeks of study. Patients randomized to the BLT condition exhibited a statistically significant improvement in nocturnal sleep from a mean of 6.4 hours/night to 8.1 hours/night 4 weeks later (p<0.05). The sleep of patients in the control condition did not improve significantly. There were no other significant differences between baseline and follow-up, nor between BLT and control treated patients on the other outcome measures, which included the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer Disease scale (Behave-AD) and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia.
                Patients with dementia in chronic care who exhibit agitated behaviors sleep more hours at night when administered morning BLT. However, BLT does not lead to improvements in agitated behaviors in institutionalized patients with dementia with non-disturbed sleep-wake cycles.
                Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Preliminary data suggest that morning bright light might improve symptoms of agitation, a serious problem in patients with dementia. The authors expand on an earlier pilot study by evaluating the effect of bright light therapy on agitated behavior in a large sample of patients with severe dementia.
                Ninety-two patients were randomly assigned to morning bright light, morning dim red light, or evening bright light. Agitation was rated by research staff who observed the patients every 15 minutes throughout the treatment period and by caregivers at one time-point before and one time-point after treatment.
                Morning bright light delayed the acrophase of the agitation rhythm by over 1.5 hours. Bright light was associated with improved caregivers' ratings but had little effect on observational ratings of agitation.
                Although the result that light shifted the peak of the agitated behavior might be generalizable to patients with milder forms of AD, the fact that agitation was not ameliorated might not be. Because the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of patients with severe AD is likely to be more degenerated, and the circadian activity rhythms deteriorate as the disease progresses, it is still possible that patients with more intact SCNs, that is, patients with mild or moderate AD, might benefit from light treatment even more than those with severe AD. Previous reports have shown that bright light exposure may benefit patients with seasonal depression. In the present study, the possible therapeutic effect of bright light in nonseasonal major depressive disorder was examined. Forty-two depressed patients not receiving additional antidepressant medication were exposed to bright white light of 2500 lux or dim red light of 50 lux over one week for two hr daily in the morning. The change in depressive symptoms was assessed by rating scales (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, CGI) and by self-rating scales (Depression Scale, Complaint List, Visual Analogue Scale). Consistent for all ratings, the decrease in depressive symptoms after bright white light was only slight and not different from dim red-light exposure. Contrary to the findings in seasonal affective disorder, phototherapy administered over one week for two hr daily is not effective in nonseasonal major depressive disorder. Psychotropic drug-free hospitalized veterans with nonseasonal major depressive disorders or depressed forms of bipolar disorder were treated with light for 1 week. Twenty-five patients were randomly assigned to bright white light treatment (2000-3000 lux), and 26 patients were randomized to dim red light placebo control treatment. Unlike those treated with dim red light, those treated with bright white light showed declines in three measures of depression during treatment. Partial relapse appeared within 2 days. A global depression score showed a statistically significant (p = 0.02) difference favoring bright white light treatment. Two bright-light-treated patients became mildly hypomanic, but side effects were mild. Improvement was not correlated with patient expectations; indeed, patients expected somewhat greater benefit from the placebo. Patients treated in summer responded as well as those treated in winter. Baseline electroencephalogram (EEG) sleep stage data (e.g., rapid eye movement; REM latency) did not predict treatment responses. These 1-week treatment results suggest that bright light might produce benefits for patients with nonseasonal depression. Bright light should not be recommended for routine clinical application before additional assessments with longer treatment durations are done. The aim of a double-blind study was to assess the efficacy of bright light therapy and/or imipramine in the treatment of inpatients suffering with recurrent non-seasonal major depressive disorder.
                34 in-patients with DSM-III-R diagnosis of major depressive disorder, recurrent type, were randomly allocated into 3 treatment groups. After 4-day washout period with baseline assessment they underwent 3 weeks of different types of treatment: a) Group A: bright light therapy (5000 lux from 6-8 a.m.) and imipramine 150 mg/day. b) Group B: bright light therapy (5000 lux from 6-8 a.m.) and imipramine-like placebo. c) Group C: dim red light (500 lux from 6-8 a.m.) and imipramine 150 mg/day. Outcome measures included weekly Hamilton Psychiatric Rating Scale for Depression, Clinical Global Impression Scale, Montgomery and Asberg Psychiatric Rating Scale for Depression and Beck Depression Inventory.
                Patients of all three groups improved significantly. The improvement of the patients of group B treated with bright light therapy plus placebo was superior to the other two groups, but not significantly.
                Bright light therapy can be effective in the treatment of non-seasonal major depressive disorder.
There is insufficient evidence to assess the value of light therapy for people with dementia. Most of the available studies are not of high methodological quality and further research is required.