Controlled trial of a 5-day course of telithromycin versus doxycycline for treatment of mild to moderate scrub typhus. A comparative trial of a single dose of azithromycin versus doxycycline for the treatment of mild scrub typhus. Doxycycline and rifampicin for mild scrub-typhus infections in northern Thailand: a randomised trial.
New antibiotics are required to have the antibacterial activity against doxycycline-resistant Orientia tsutsugamushi. An in vitro sensitivity study showed that telithromycin was more effective than erythromycin for Rickettsia, Bartonella, and Coxiella burnetii. In this prospective, open-label, randomized trial, we enrolled patients with mild-to-moderate scrub typhus. We compared the efficacy and safety of a 5-day telithromycin therapy with those of a 5-day doxycycline therapy at Chosun University Hospital or one of its two community-based affiliated hospitals (Jangheung Hospital and Cheomdan Hospital), which are all located in southwestern Korea, between September and December 2005. A total of 92 patients were randomly assigned to either the telithromycin group (n = 47) or the doxycycline group (n = 45). After the treatment, fever control time was 20.45 +/- 12.9 h in the telithromycin group and 22.60 +/- 21.44 h in the doxycycline group (P > 0.05). After the treatment, the cure rate was 100% in the telithromycin group and 97.8% in the doxycycline group (P > 0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in time elapsed until such symptoms as headache, myalgia, and rash disappeared. No serious adverse events or death were noted following the treatment in both groups. There were no significant differences in adverse events. In conclusion, the efficacy and safety of a 5-day once-a-day regimen of 800 mg telithromycin were equivalent to those of a 5-day twice-a-day regimen of 100 mg doxycycline in patients with mild-to-moderate scrub typhus. Telithromycin could be considered a promising new antibacterial agent for patients with scrub typhus. Scrub typhus is one of the most important endemic infections in the Asia-Pacific region. Although tetracyclines or chloramphenicol are the recommended drugs of choice for the treatment of scrub typhus, reports of doxycycline-resistant strains have prompted a search for alternative treatments.
                We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomized trial from September 2002 through November 2003 to compare azithromycin with doxycycline for the treatment of mild scrub typhus. The time to defervescence was assessed to compare the efficacy of the 2 treatment regimens.
                A total of 93 patients were randomly assigned to receive either a single 500-mg dose of azithromycin or a 1-week course of daily oral 200-mg dose of doxycycline. Cure was achieved in 47 (100%) of 47 patients in the azithromycin-treated group and in 43 (93.5%) of 46 patients in the doxycycline-treated group (P=.117). The median time to defervescence was 21 h for the azithromycin-treated group and 29 h for the doxycycline-treated group (P=.097). There were no serious adverse events during the study. No relapses occurred in either group during a 1-month follow-up period.
                The single 500-mg dose of azithromycin was as effective as the 1-week course of daily 200-mg doses of doxycycline for the treatment of mild scrub typhus acquired in South Korea. Some strains of scrub typhus in northern Thailand are poorly responsive to standard antirickettsial drugs. We therefore did a masked, randomised trial to compare rifampicin with standard doxycycline therapy for patients with scrub typhus.
                Adult patients with strictly defined, mild scrub typhus were initially randomly assigned 1 week of daily oral treatment with 200 mg doxycycline (n=40), 600 mg rifampicin (n=38), or doxycycline with rifampicin (n=11). During the first year of treatment, the combined regimen was withdrawn because of lack of efficacy and the regimen was replaced with 900 mg rifampicin (n=37). Treatment outcome was assessed by fever clearance time (the time for oral temperature to fall below 37.3 degrees C).
                About 12,800 fever patients were screened during the 3-year study to recruit 126 patients with confirmed scrub typhus and no other infection, of whom 86 completed therapy. Eight individuals received the combined regimen that was discontinued after 1 year. The median duration of pyrexia was significantly shorter (p=0.01) in the 24 patients treated with 900 mg daily rifampicin (fever clearance time 22.5 h) and in the 26 patients who received 600 mg rifampicin (fever clearance time 27.5 h) than in the 28 patients given doxycycline monotherapy (fever clearance time 52 h). Fever resolved in a significantly higher proportion of patients within 48 h of starting rifampicin (900 mg=79% [19 of 24], 600 mg=77% [20 of 26]) than in patients treated with doxycycline (46% [13 of 28]; p=0.02). Severe gastrointestinal events warranted exclusion of two patients on doxycyline. There were two relapses after doxycycline therapy, but none after rifampicin therapy.
                Rifampicin is more effective than doxycycline against scrub-typhus infections acquired in northern Thailand, where strains with reduced susceptibility to antibiotics can occur.
Data are limited because trials are small. There are no obvious differences between tetracycline, doxycycline, telithromycin,or azithromycin; rifampicin may be better than tetracycline in areas where scrub typhus appears to respond poorly to standard anti-rickettsial drugs.