Unstable extra-articular fractures of the distal radius: a prospective, randomised study of immobilisation in a cast versus supplementary percutaneous pinning. Conservative management of minimally displaced isolated fractures of the ulnar shaft. Two procedures for Kirschner wire osteosynthesis of distal radial fractures. A randomized trial. The non-operative management of radial head fractures: a randomized trial of three treatments. Displaced intra-articular fractures of distal radius: a comparative evaluation of results following closed reduction, external fixation and open reduction with internal fixation. Seven-year outcome following Colles' type distal radial fracture. A comparison of two treatment methods. Intra-articular fractures of the calcaneum treated operatively or conservatively. A prospective study. A prospective randomized trial of external fixation and plaster cast immobilization in the treatment of distal radial fractures. Trans-styloid fixation of fractures of the distal radius. A prospective randomized comparison between 6- and 1-week postoperative immobilization in 60 fractures. Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates. Improving evaluation and treatment for osteoporosis following distal radial fractures. A prospective randomized intervention. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures-a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Redisplaced unstable fractures of the distal radius: a prospective randomised comparison of four methods of treatment. Norian SRS versus functional treatment in redisplaced distal radial fractures: a randomized study in 20 patients. Norian SRS versus external fixation in redisplaced distal radial fractures. A randomized study in 40 patients. Unstable articular fractures of the distal radius. Comparative techniques of ligamentotaxis. Primary bone grafting does not improve the results in severely displaced distal radius fractures. A randomized, controlled trial of distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement but without joint incongruity: closed reduction and casting versus closed reduction, spanning external fixation, and optional percutaneous K-wires. Biodegradable implants versus standard metal fixation for displaced radial head fractures. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Cast or external fixation for fracture of the distal radius. A prospective study of 126 cases. The effect of passive mobilisation following fractures involving the distal radius: a randomised study. Immediate mobilization compared with conventional immobilization for the impacted nonoperatively treated proximal humeral fracture. A randomized controlled trial. Health and cost consequences of surgical versus conservative treatment for a comminuted proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients. Redisplaced unstable fractures of the distal radius. A randomised, prospective study of bridging versus non-bridging external fixation. Controlled trial of distal radial fractures treated with a resorbable bone mineral substitute.
We performed a prospective, randomised study on 57 patients older than 60 years of age with unstable, extra-articular fractures of the distal radius to compare the outcome of immobilisation in a cast alone with that using supplementary, percutaneous pinning. Patients treated by percutaneous wires had a statistically significant improvement in dorsal angulation (mean 7 degrees), radial length (mean 3 mm) and radial inclination (mean 3 mm) at one year. However, there was no significant difference in functional outcome in terms of pain, range of movement, grip strength, activities of daily living and the SF-36 score except for an improved range of movement in ulnar deviation in the percutaneous wire group. One patient developed a pin-track infection which required removal of the wires at two weeks. We conclude that percutaneous pinning of unstable, extra-articular fractures of the distal radius provides only a marginal improvement in the radiological parameters compared with immobilisation in a cast alone. This does not correlate with an improved functional outcome in a low-demand, elderly population. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare three different ways of conservative management of isolated fractures of the ulnar shaft: immediate mobilisation, below-elbow plaster cast and above-elbow plaster cast immobilisation. Over a 24-month period, 102 minimally displaced isolated fractures of the distal two-thirds of the ulnar shaft were treated on an outpatient basis. Thirty-two fractures were immobilised with an above-elbow plaster cast for 3 weeks and a below-elbow plaster cast for an additional 3 weeks. Thirty-six fractures were immobilised with a below-elbow plaster cast for 6 weeks. The remaining 34 fractures were managed with immediate mobilisation. Radiological healing, range of motion of the wrist, and pain were assessed. Results were good and were comparable in terms of healing, time to healing, pain and range of motion of the wrist. The treatment of displaced Colles-type fractures of the distal part of the radius remains a challenge. Two procedures for closed reduction and Kirschner wire osteosynthesis of these fractures were compared in a prospective randomized study.
                One hundred consecutive patients with a Colles fracture of the distal part of the radius (AO classification 23-A2, 23-A3, or 23-C1) were treated over an eighteen-month period. One group was managed with the conventional method, described by Willenegger and Guggenbuhl in 1959, in which two Kirschner wires are introduced into the styloid process of the radius. The other group was treated with the Kapandji method, as modified by Fritz et al., in which two Kirschner wires are inserted into the fracture gap and a third is placed through the styloid process. Postoperative care was standardized for both groups and carried out according to a strict procedure. Forty patients who had been operated on according to the modified Kapandji method and forty-one treated with the Willenegger technique were available for follow-up, for a follow-up rate of 81%. The follow-up assessment was performed with a modified version of the Martini score.
                The median time to follow-up was ten months (range, six to twenty months). The results as assessed with the Martini score were, on the average, good to very good for the patients treated with the Kapandji method and satisfactory to good for the patients treated with the conventional Kirschner wire fixation. The duration of radiographic exposure was significantly shorter with the Kapandji method than with the Willenegger technique.
                Conventional Kirschner wire fixation remains a good method of osteosynthesis for the treatment of displaced fractures of the distal part of the radius. We found both the functional and radiographic outcomes of the Kapandji method to be significantly better than those of the Willenegger technique.
                Therapeutic study, Level I-1a (randomized controlled trial [significant difference]). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Ninety-eight consecutive patients with Mason type 1 and 2 radial head fractures were randomized into three treatment groups to compare early mobilization with immobilization in flexion and extension. Eighty-one patients were reviewed on average 25 months following fracture and assessed for pain, disability and range of movement. Loss of full extension was the most frequent restriction of movement and was found in 17 patients. Two patients had restricted flexion without limited extension. Patients immobilized in a flexion cast had a significantly reduced range of movement compared with patients immobilized in extension (P = 0.02). Nineteen patients had residual pain and again the flexion group fared worse than the extension group (P = 0.06). Results from early mobilization in a sling were not significantly different from the other two groups. Treatment of radial head fractures in flexion casts should be avoided. Fractures of the distal end of the radius are common injuries and are the commonest bony injury around the wrist. Management of these fractures has remained controversial as far as modality of treatment is concerned. In this study 90 adult cases of acute displaced intra-articular fractures of the lower end of the radius were classified according to Frykman's and AO classifications after obtaining radiographs in antero-posterior and lateral planes. These were randomly treated by one of three methods: (1) closed reduction and plaster immobilisation, (2) external fixation and (3) open reduction and internal fixation, and were followed for an average of 4 yr. In the final functional assessment (Sarmiento) the results were (1) plaster 43% good and excellent, 50% fair and 7% poor, (2) external fixator 80% good and excellent, 20% fair and poor results, (3) open reduction and internal fixation 63% good and excellent, 26% fair, 11% poor. We recommend that displaced severely comminuted intra-articular fractures should be treated with an external fixator. Eighty-five patients were reviewed 7 years after prospective randomization to bridging external fixation or plaster immobilization for treatment of a Colles' type distal radial fracture. The Gartland and Werley score showed that most patients in each group had an excellent or good outcome and patient satisfaction was comparable and high in both groups. The fixator group had significantly less radial shortening (P<0.05). Despite a high level of radiographic malunion (50%) overall function, range of movement and activities of daily living were not limited. Twenty-five per cent of patients had minor radiological signs of post-traumatic arthritis although only one patient was symptomatic. We conclude that, in the long term, external fixation of distal radius fractures does not confer an improved outcome when compared to plaster immobilization. We report a prospective trial of 66 patients with intraarticular fractures of the calcaneum. All fractures were assessed by CT. Patients with displaced fractures were randomised to receive either conservative (n = 31) or operative treatment (n = 25). Undisplaced fractures (n = 10) were treated conservatively. Operation involved open reduction of the posterior subtalar joint, and fixation with Kirschner wires. All 66 patients were reviewed at a minimum of one year (mean 23 months). After conservative treatment the undisplaced fractures had slightly better results than the displaced fractures. There was no significant difference in outcome between the operatively and the conservatively treated displaced fractures. We have also documented prospectively the natural history of the injury, which is of use in assessing prognosis for both clinical and medicolegal purposes. Distal radial fractures are common, and many methods of treatment have been reported but there are no studies that compare the different treatment methods. This randomized prospective study demonstrated no advantage in using an external fixator to immobilize reduced distal radial fractures over closed reduction and plaster cast immobilization in patients less than 60 years of age. The external fixator group had a significant complication rate. We performed a prospective randomized study on 60 patients with dorsally displaced extra-articular or noncomminuted intraarticular fractures of the distal radius. All 60 fractures were treated by closed reduction and Kirchner wire trans-styloid fixation. 30 patients had 1 weeks' postoperative immobilization and 30 patients had 6 weeks' immobilization. All patients had a clinical and radiographic review at 6 weeks and at 1 year after the operation. Pain, range of movement and grip strength were tested clinically, and changes in dorsal tilt, frontal radial deviation, ulnar variance, and radial shortening were assessed radiographically. Rates of complications were the same in both groups. At follow-up, pain was similar in both groups and range of motion and grip strength were somewhat better after early mobilization--in comparison with the opposite wrist--but this was statistically significant only for ulnar deviation. The postoperative radiographic reductions were similar in both groups, with no differences in loss of reduction after bone healing. Therefore, in Colles' fractures, trans-styloid fixation with two K-wires seems to give a stable osteosynthesis, which does not need additional immobilization with a plaster cast. To compare the clinical and radiographic results for locked intramedullary (IM) nails and plates used in the treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures.
                Prospective randomization by sealed-envelope technique of eighty-four patients into two study groups: those treated by intramedullary nailing (IMN group; n = 38) and those treated by compression plating (PLT group; n = 46).
                Patients admitted consecutively to a university-affiliated Level I trauma center. PATIENT/PARTICIPANTS: All skeletally mature patients admitted to Harborview Medical Center with acute humeral shaft fractures requiring surgical stabilization. Fractures of the diaphysis were defined as being at least three centimeters distal to the surgical neck and at least five centimeters proximal to the olecranon fossa.
                Treatment with locking antegrade intramedullary humeral nails (Russell-Taylor design [Smith and Nephew Richards]) or with 4.5-millimeter dynamic compression and limited contact dynamic compression plates (AO design [Synthes]).
                Clinical outcome measurements included fracture healing, radial nerve recovery, infection, and elbow and shoulder discomfort. Radiographic measurements included fracture alignment, time to healing, delayed union, and nonunion.
                Follow-up averaged thirteen months. Forty-two fractures (93 percent) in the PLT group were healed by sixteen weeks versus thirty-three fractures (87 percent) in the IMN group (p = 0.70). Shoulder pain and a decrement in shoulder range of motion (ROM) were significant associations with IMN (p = 0.007 for both variables) but not with PLT. A decrement in elbow ROM was significantly associated with PLT (p = 0.03), especially for fractures of the distal third of the diaphysis, whereas elbow pain was not (p = 0.123). The sum of other complications demonstrated nearly equal prevalence for both treatment groups.
                For patients requiring surgical treatment of a humeral shaft fracture, intramedullary nailing and compression plating both provide predictable methods for achieving fracture stabilization and ultimate healing. Fragility fractures are associated with a significant increase in the risk of future fracture, but the rates of evaluation to identify osteoporosis after such injuries are low. The purpose of this study was to determine the rates of evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis following distal radial fractures and to test two interventions in the outpatient clinic to improve evaluation and treatment rates.
                In the first part of the study, the medical records of 298 consecutive patients treated for a fragility fracture of the distal part of the radius were reviewed. Primary outcome measures were a bone mineral density examination and treatment with osteoporosis medication within six months after the fracture. In the second part of the study, fifty patients with a fragility fracture of the distal part of the radius were prospectively randomized to receive one of two interventions. These consisted of (1) the orthopaedic surgeon ordering a bone mineral density examination and forwarding the results to the primary care physician or (2) the orthopaedic surgeon sending a letter to the primary care physician outlining guidelines for osteoporosis screening. Patients were contacted at six months after the fracture to determine the rates of evaluation and treatment for osteoporosis.
                The first part of the study revealed that, following a distal radial fracture, 21.3% of 240 patients had a bone mineral density examination and 78.7% were never screened. Osteopenia was the most common diagnosis among those screened (57%). Most (72.5%) of the 240 patients received no medication, whereas 6.7% received calcium and vitamin D; 11.3%, bisphosphonates; 2.5%, hormone replacement therapy; and 7.1%, a combination regimen. The treatment rate for the patients who had undergone a bone mineral density examination was 2.5-fold higher than the rate for those who had not had bone mineral density testing (53% compared with 21%, p < 0.001). In the second part of the study, the patients randomized to Intervention 1 had two to threefold greater rates of bone mineral density testing (93% compared with 30%, p < 0.001), discussion of osteoporosis with their primary care physician (89% compared with 35%, p < 0.001), and initiation of osteoporosis therapy (74% compared with 26%, p < 0.001) compared with patients randomized to Intervention 2.
                Rates of evaluation and treatment for osteoporosis after fragility fractures remain low (21.3% and 27.5%, respectively). Patients who undergo a bone mineral density examination are more likely to receive treatment. Ordering a bone mineral density examination in the orthopaedic clinic can dramatically improve osteoporosis evaluation and treatment rates following fragility fractures of the distal part of the radius. To compare elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) with nonoperative treatment of fully displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in adults.
                The study was a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.
                Level 1 trauma center.
                Sixty patients between 18 and 65 years of age participated and completed the study. They were randomized to either operative or nonoperative treatment with a 2-year follow-up.
                Thirty patients were treated with a simple shoulder sling and 30 patients with ESIN within 3 days after trauma.
                Complications after operative and nonoperative treatments, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and Constant Shoulder Score for outcome measurement, and clavicular shortening.
                Fracture union was achieved in all patients in the operative group, whereas nonunion was observed in 3 of 30 patients of the nonoperative group. Two symptomatic malunions required corrective osteotomy in the nonoperative group. Medial nail protrusion occurred in 7 cases in the operative group. Implant failure with revision surgery was necessary in 2 patients after an additional adequate trauma. DASH scores were lower in the operative group throughout the first 6 months and 2 years after trauma, with a significant difference during the first 18 weeks. Constant scores were significantly higher after 6 months and 2 years after intramedullary stabilization. Patients in the operative group showed a significant improvement of posttraumatic clavicular shortening; they were also more satisfied with cosmetic appearance and overall outcome.
                ESIN of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures resulted in a lower rate of nonunion and delayed union, a faster return to daily activities, and a better functional outcome. Clavicular shortening was significantly lower, and overall satisfaction was higher in the operative group. We performed a prospective, randomised trial on 120 patients with redisplaced fractures of the distal radius comparing four methods of treatment. The four treatment groups, each containing 30 patients, were remanipulation and plaster, open reduction and bone grafting, and closed external fixation with and without mobilisation of the wrist at three weeks. The radiological results showed improvement in angulation of the distal radius for the open reduction and bone grafting group. Functional results at six weeks, three and six months and at one year, however, showed no difference between any of the four groups. The main influence on final outcome was carpal malalignment which had a statistically significant negative effect on function. We compared the use of Norian SRS, an injectable calcium phosphate bone cement, with functional treatment of redisplaced distal radial fractures in a prospective randomized study of 20 patients. The redisplaced fractures were either rereduced and stabilized by Norian SRS, or the displaced position was accepted and was not rereduced. All wrists were immobilized in a short-arm dorsal splint for 1 week, followed by a removable splint for another 3 weeks. The chosen primary effect variable was grip strength at 7 weeks, and this did not differ between the two treatment groups. The clinical results at 6 months in both groups were similar. We conclude that aggressive treatment of redisplaced fractures of the distal radius may be unnecessary in most women aged 50 years or more. We compared Norian SRS, an injectable calcium phosphate bone cement, with external fixation in the treatment of redisplaced distal radial fractures by a prospective randomized study in 40 patients (women 50-80 years or men 60-80 years). After rereduction, the fracture was either stabilized by injection of SRS and immobilized with a cast for 2 weeks, or externally fixed with Hoffman's bar for 5 weeks. Each patient was evaluated at 2, 5, 7 weeks and at 3, 6 and 12 months. Functional parameters were grip strength, range of motion and pain. Radiographic parameters were radial angle, ulnar variance and dorsal tilt. The chosen primary effect variable was grip strength at 7 weeks. Patients treated by injection of SRS apatite had better grip strength, wrist extension and forearm supination at 7 weeks. There was no difference in functional parameters at 3 months or later. None of the methods could fully stabilize the fracture: radiographs showed a progressive redislocation over time. The results indicate that SRS can be used in the treatment of unstable distal radial fractures. The more rapid recovery of grip strength and wrist mobility in the SRS group appears to be due to the shorter immobilization time. Ligamentotaxis employing either pins and plaster or external fixators, frequently in conjunction with supplemental Kirschner wire internal fixation, has proved to be a reliable means of maintaining an accurate reduction of unstable articular fractures of the distal radius. Critical preoperative evaluation and surgical restoration of articular congruity along with attention to key technical details have resulted in a reproducible successful recovery. In our experience, the advantages of the pins and plaster technique are its relatively simple methodology, its comparatively low cost, and its high level of patient acceptance. The distinctive advantages of the external fixator are its superior mechanical efficiency, its capacity for fracture adjustment during the healing period, and the fact that it ensures unimpeded access to wounds. Nonetheless, regardless of the specific method chosen, this study clearly supports the contention that precision in patient selection and pin placement are the prerequisites for successful ligamentotaxis in the management of distal radius fractures. We prospectively randomised 45 patients ages 20-70 years with distal radius fractures of Older type III and IV to one of two treatment groups. One group was treated with closed reduction, primary bone grafting, and external fixation for 3 weeks, followed by a plaster cast that allowed volar flexion, for an additional 3 weeks. The other group was treated with closed reduction and external fixation for 6 weeks. The functional and radiographic results were evaluated. There was no difference between the two groups in either clinical or radiographic outcome. We do not recommend external fixation and primary bone grafting as a routine method in these fractures. To compare closed reduction and casting with closed reduction and external fixation with optional K-wire fixation for distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement but without joint incongruity.
                Prospective study.
                Multicenter study at 3 University teaching hospitals.
                A total of 113 skeletally mature patients with distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement, but without joint incongruity, were randomized to receive 1 of 2 standardized treatment protocols. Patients were evaluated at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.
                Closed reduction and casting (n = 59) or closed reduction and external fixation (n = 54).
                Upper extremity function was measured using upper extremity MFA domain scores, overall Jebsen Taylor scores, and pinch and grip strength tests. Global function and pain were measured using the SF-36. Radiographic evaluation and range of motion were documented.
                Upper extremity MFA scores, Jebsen Taylor scores, SF-36 bodily pain scores, and grip strength improved significantly during the first year for all patients. By 2 years, mean Jebsen Taylor scores and SF 36 bodily pain scores for patients in both groups were similar to scores for normal age- and gender-matched population controls. At all points, there was a trend for better function in the external fixation; however, this did not reach statistical significance. There was a trend for better length and palmar tilt restoration with external fixation.
                For distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement but with a congruous joint, there exists a trend for better functional, clinical, and radiographic outcomes when treated by immediate external fixation and optional K-wire fixation. This multicenter, prospective, randomized study compares the use of biodegradable polylactide pins with standard metal mini-fragment implants for the treatment of displaced radial head fractures. It compares complication rates and clinical outcomes of both treatment methods. At 2 years, 135 (82%) of 164 patients were available for evaluation. Equivalence of treatment method was defined as a difference of 10% or less in the number of complication-free patients. Functional status was assessed by using the Broberg and Morrey Elbow Score and compared by an unpaired t test. Good or excellent clinical results were achieved by 92% (56/61) of the control patients and 96% (71/74) of the polylactide patients. The incidence of complication-free patients was 3.7% less in the polylactide group than in the control group. The 1-sided 95% confidence interval for the treatment difference between the 2 groups was more than -6.1%. Biodegradable polylactide pins have at least comparable outcomes as standard metal implants for the internal fixation of reconstructable displaced radial head fractures. In a prospective 4-year study, 126 consecutive patients with a fracture of the distal radius were followed. Functional, anatomic, and radiographic final results of fixation with above-the-elbow cast immobilization were compared with the results obtained with external fixation. The results following external fixation of comminuted intraarticular fractures were better than those of similar fractures treated in a cast. Aged osteoporotic patients tolerated better residual deformities, and the clinical results had a relatively low correlation with the final anatomic alignment. We suggest that extraarticular fractures of the distal radius should be treated with cast immobilization. Comminuted intraarticular fractures of the distal radius should be treated with external fixation, which maintains accurate anatomic position until solid fracture healing is achieved. This study investigated whether passive mobilisation added to the effectiveness of an advice and exercise regimen for patients following distal radial fractures. Thirty-nine patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Patients in the first group received advice and exercises; patients in the second group also received a six-week course of passive mobilisation. Range of movement, function and pain were measured pre-treatment, and three and six weeks later. Significant improvements were found over time for all outcome measures. No significant differences were detected between groups for any outcomes except flexion, where the difference was not clinically important. Routine passive mobilisation does not appear to incur additional benefit over an advice and exercise regimen for this patient group. There have been few randomized controlled trials evaluating nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures. To investigate shortening the period of dependence, we assessed the feasibility and efficacy of early mobilization of the shoulder (within three days after the fracture) in comparison with those of conventional three-week immobilization followed by physiotherapy.
                We randomly assigned seventy-four patients with an impacted proximal humeral fracture to receive early passive mobilization or conventional treatment. The primary outcome was the overall shoulder functional status (as measured with the Constant score) at three months. The secondary outcomes were the Constant score at six weeks and at six months, the change in pain (on a visual analog scale), and the active and passive range of motion.
                At three months and at six weeks, the early mobilization group had a significantly better Constant score than did the conventional-treatment group (between-group difference, 9.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 17.8] [p = 0.02] and 10.1 [95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 18.1] [p = 0.02], respectively) and better active mobility in forward elevation (between-group difference, 12.0 [95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 22.4] [p = 0.02] and 28.1 [95% confidence interval, 7.1 to 49.1] [p = 0.01], respectively). At three months, the early mobilization group had significantly reduced pain compared with the conventional-treatment group (between-group difference, 15.7 [95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 30.8] [p = 0.04]). No complications in displacement or nonhealing were noted.
                Early mobilization for impacted nonoperatively treated proximal humeral fractures is safe and is more effective for quickly restoring the physical capability and performance of the injured arm than is conventional immobilization followed by physiotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the costs and health outcome for surgical and conservative treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures.
                This study is a randomised controlled trial.
                This study included 50 patients aged 60 or older admitted to hospital with a severely displaced three- or four-part fracture.
                The patients were treated surgically with an angular stable interlocking implant (25 patients) or conservative treatment (25 patients).
                The outcomes measured included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and societal costs.
                At 12 months' follow-up, the mean difference in the number of QALYs was 0.027 (95% confidence interval (CI)=-0.025, 0.078) while the mean difference in total health-care costs was 597 euro in favour of surgery (95% CI=-5291, 3777).
                There was no significant difference in QALYs or costs between surgical and conservative treatment of severe displaced proximal humeral fractures.
                Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. A randomised, prospective study was carried out on 60 patients with unstable fractures of the distal radius to compare bridging with non-bridging external fixation using pins placed in the distal fragment of the radius. The radiological results showed significant improvement in the non-bridging group at all stages of review. In particular, normal volar tilt and carpal alignment were regained and maintained. The functional results at six weeks, three months, six months and one year showed statistically better grip strength and flexion in the non-bridging group at all stages of review. Other ranges of movement showed an early advantage in the non-bridging group. Non-bridging external fixation is the treatment of choice for unstable fractures of the distal radius which have sufficient space for the placement of pins in the distal fragment. This randomized trial compared the use of hydroxyapatite cement with Kapandji wiring in distal radial fractures. Two groups of nine patients with distal radial fractures were either treated by reduction and fixation with wires or insertion of the cement into the fracture void. There was no difference between the groups before operation, on reduction or at day 1. Dorsal angle in the hydroxyapatite group was significantly worse at 6, 12 and 26 weeks. Grip strength and palmar flexion were poor in the hydroxyapatite cement group. All the clinical parameters and X-ray variables were worse at 12 and 26 weeks in the hydroxyapatite cement group. We conclude from this trial that there is nothing to support the use of this hydroxyapatite cement, without the use of additional fixation, in distal radial fractures.
                Copyright 2001 The British Society for Surgery of the Hand.
There remains insufficient evidence from randomised controlled trials to determine which methods of conservative treatment are the most appropriate for the more common types of distal radial fractures in adults. Therefore, at present, practitioners applying conservative management should use an accepted technique with which they are familiar, and which is cost-effective from the perspective of their provider unit. Patient preferences and circumstances, and the risk of complications should also be considered.
Prioritising research questions to clarify the most appropriate conservative treatment for this common fracture is warranted. Researchers should differentiate between extra-articular and intra-articular, and non-displaced and displaced fractures, ascertain patient preferences, and agree a core outcome data set.