Randomized trial of efficacy of crystalloid and colloid resuscitation on hemodynamic response and lung water following thermal injury. Restoration of volume by crystalloid versus colloid after coronary artery bypass: hemodynamics, lung water, oxygenation, and outcome. Intraoperative colloid administration reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting and improves postoperative outcomes compared with crystalloid administration. Crystalloid versus colloid fluid therapy after cardiac surgery. A prospective analysis of hypertonic lactated saline v. Ringer's lactate-colloid for the resuscitation of severely burned children. Hypertonic sodium lactate versus lactated ringer's solution for intravenous fluid therapy in operations on the abdominal aorta. Hypertonic saline fluid therapy following surgery: a prospective study. A multicenter trial for resuscitation of injured patients with 7.5% sodium chloride. The effect of added dextran 70. The Multicenter Group for the Study of Hypertonic Saline in Trauma Patients. Crystalloid versus colloid in fluid resuscitation of patients with severe pulmonary insufficiency. Analysis of potential risks associated with 7.5% sodium chloride resuscitation of traumatic shock. Randomized evaluation of fluid resuscitation with crystalloid (saline) and colloid (polymer from degraded gelatin in saline) in pediatric septic shock. Hypertonic solutions in the treatment of hypovolemic shock: a prospective, randomized study in patients admitted to the emergency room. Optimal fluid management after aortic reconstruction: a prospective study of two crystalloid solutions. Serum osmolar and electrolyte changes associated with large infusions of hypertonic sodium lactate for intravascular volume expansion of patients undergoing aortic reconstruction. Prehospital resuscitation of hypotensive trauma patients with 7.5% NaCl versus 7.5% NaCl with added dextran: a controlled trial. Crystalloid vs. colloid resuscitation: is one better? A randomized clinical study.
To assess the effects of crystalloid and colloid resuscitation on hemodynamic response and on lung water following thermal injury, 79 patients were assigned randomly to receive lactated Ringer's solution or 2.5% albumin-lactated Ringer's solution. Crystalloid-treated patients required more fluid for successful resuscitation than did those receiving colloid solutions (3.81 vs. 2.98 ml/kg body weight/% body surface burn, p less than 0.01). In study phase 1 (29 patients), cardiac index and myocardial contractility (ejection fraction and mean rate of internal fiber shortening, Vcf) were determined by echocardiography during the first 48 hours postburn. Cardiac index was lower in the 12- to 24-hour postburn interval in the crystalloid group, but this difference between treatment groups had disappeared by 48 hours postburn. Ejection fractions were normal throughout the entire study, while Vcf was supranormal (p less than 0.01 vs. normals) and equal in the two resuscitation groups. In study phase 2 (50 patients), extravascular lung water and cardiac index were measured by a standard rebreathing technique at least daily for the first postburn week. Lung water remained unchanged in the crystalloid-treated patients (p greater than 0.10), but progressively increased in the colloid-treated patients over the seven day study (p less than 0.0001). The measured lung water in each treatment group was significantly different from one another (p less than 0.001). Cardiac index increased progressively and identically in both treatment groups over the study period (p less than 0.01). These data refute the existence of myocardial depression during postburn resuscitation and document hypercontractile left ventricular performance. The addition of colloid to crystalloid resuscitation fluids produces no long lasting benefit on total body blood flow, and promotes accumulation of lung water when edema fluid is being reabsorbed from the burn wound. We compared Ringer's acetate-gluconate solution with 6% dextran-70 infused during rewarming after coronary bypass surgery. In a randomized study, 18 patients received 56 +/- 15 ml/kg of crystalloid (group 1), and 14 patients received 16 +/- 6 ml/kg of dextran (group 2). Data were taken at the following intervals: 4 to 5 h after terminating the cardiopulmonary bypass, after rewarming, the next morning on controlled ventilation and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) breathing, and after extubation. The patients were followed for 14 days. Prophylactic nitroglycerin infusion may have increased the need for plasma expansion. After volume loading, the stroke index increased in both groups, but the left ventricular stroke work index increased in group 2 only. After transition to the CPAP mode, hydrostatic pressures increased, more in group 2, doubling the pulmonary shunt flow. Pulmonary extravascular thermal volume did not change in either group. We conclude that hemodynamic stability occurred faster with dextran, and ventilatory weaning was somewhat easier with crystalloid. The debate over colloid versus crystalloid as the best solution for intraoperative fluid resuscitation is not resolved. Published studies have shown that mortality is not related to the specific fluid used for resuscitation. In addition, the quality of postoperative recovery between colloid and crystalloid has not been well investigated. In a prospective, blinded fashion, we investigated the effects of colloid and crystalloid resuscitation on nausea and vomiting and on the postoperative patient recovery profile. Patients undergoing major elective noncardiac surgery were randomized to receive 6% hetastarch in saline (HS-NS), 6% hetastarch in balanced salt (HS-BS), or lactated Ringer's solution (LR) on the basis of a fluid administration algorithm. The anesthetic was standardized. Hemodynamic targets included maintenance of arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and urine output within a predefined range. A postoperative morbidity survey was performed at baseline and daily after surgery. Ninety patients participated in the study, with 30 patients in each group. The amounts of study fluid (mean +/- SD) administered were 1301 +/- 1079 mL, 1448 +/- 759 mL, and 5946 +/- 1909 mL for the HS-NS, HS-BS, and LR groups, respectively (P < 0.05, HS-NS and HS-BS versus LR). Both the HS-NS and HS-BS (colloid) groups had a significantly less frequent incidence of nausea and vomiting, use of rescue antiemetics, severe pain, periorbital edema, and double vision. We concluded that intraoperative fluid resuscitation with colloid, when compared with crystalloid administration, is associated with an improvement in the quality of postoperative recovery. Differences in hemodynamic stability and fluid requirements were examined in patients randomly assigned to receive either normal saline crystalloid solution (N = 10) or hetastarch colloid solution (N = 11) after coronary artery bypass or valve operation. Both solutions were administered in the same manner for 8 hours after surgery, with hourly assessment of hemodynamic parameters and intake/output data. Infusion rates and 8-hour intake were higher for the group receiving normal saline solution (p less than 0.001), as was postoperative weight gain (p less than 0.01), although urine and chest tube outputs did not differ. Despite lower filling pressures, subjects receiving hetastarch exhibited higher systolic blood pressures and cardiac outputs (p less than 0.05). Hematocrits on postoperative day 1 were lower in the group given hetastarch (p less than 0.001), suggesting prolonged intravascular expansion. The subjects given hetastarch also required significantly less time in the intensive care unit (p less than 0.001). Thus, cardiac surgical patients receiving colloids exhibited reduced fluid requirements, superior hemodynamic performance, and shortened intensive care stay when compared with those given crystalloid resuscitation. Children and young people ranging in age from 5 months to 21 years, with burns covering greater than or equal to 30 per cent of the body surface area, were entered into a prospective study comparing the resuscitative efficacy of hypertonic lactated saline (HLS) and Ringer's lactate-colloid (RL-colloid). The 24- and 48-h fluid requirements of children resuscitated with the RL-colloid were significantly greater than those resuscitated with HLS (P less than 0.02); 2.37 +/- 0.91 ml/kg/per cent burn (HLS) v. 3.43 +/- 1.51 ml/kg/per cent burn (RL-colloid) at 24 h post-burn and 4.18 +/- 1.37 ml/kg/per cent burn (HLS) v. 6.32 +/- ml/kg/per cent burn (RL-colloid) at 48 h (P less than 0.01). The urine output between the two groups was not significantly different, and the haematocrits were equally maintained. Patients in the RL-colloid group gained significantly more weight at 48 h (P less than 0.05). The sodium requirements and resulting sodium balances were not significantly different. The desired and significant elevation (P less than 0.001) of serum sodium in the HLS group was maintained for the 5 days of the study. Colloid oncotic pressures, serum albumin and albumin/globulin (A/G) ratios were not significantly different between the two groups until 48 h post-burn. The RL-colloid group received plasmanate during the second 24-h period. The significant elevation in serum albumin, A/G ratio and colloid oncotic pressure persisted for only 2 days--by 96 h post-burn these values were no longer significantly different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Fifty-eight patients who were to undergo aortic reconstruction were prospectively randomized into two groups to compare the effects of perioperative fluid replacement with isotonic and hypertonic crystalloid solutions. Blood loss was replaced with packed red blood cells, and additional fluid was given as either Ringer's lactate solution (RL, 130 mEq sodium/L, 274 mOsm/L) or a hypertonic balanced salt solution (HSL, 250 mEq sodium/L, 514 mOsm/L). Fluid was administered to maintain the cardiac filling pressure within 3 torr of the preoperative level and the cardiac output (CO) at or above the preoperative level. The groups were similar with respect to age, preexisting disease, duration of operation, and operative blood loss. During the operation, the RL group required 9.5 +/- 0.8 L of fluid, whereas the HSL group required 4.5 +/- 0.3 L (P less than 0.001). Pulmonary, cardiac, and renal functions were adequately maintained in both groups. There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to CO, urine output, or creatinine clearance during the operation and early postoperative period. Postoperatively, the intrapulmonary shunt was 20 +/- 1% in the RL group and it was 16 +/- 1% in the HSL group (P less than 0.05). The amount of sodium infused and the cumulative sodium balance at the completion of the study period were similar in both groups. Serum sodium and osmolarity were significantly greater in the HSL group (P less than 0.001), reaching a maximum of 151 +/- 1 mEq/L and 305 +/- 2 mOsm/L, respectively. Two patients in the HSL group had a persistent elevation in serum osmolarity (greater than 320 mOsm/L) during operation, for which they received RL for the balance of the resuscitation. There were no complications that could be attributed to the hypertonicity of the solution. HSL is effective for resuscitation of patients with extracellular fluid deficit and is safe provided that the serum sodium and osmolarity are monitored during periods of large volume administration. Successful resuscitation of the injured may be achieved more rapidly and with less fluid using hypertonic crystalloid solutions than with isotonic solutions. This randomized, double-blind study compared 0.9% normal saline (NS) to 1.8% hypertonic saline (HS) in 20 postoperative coronary artery bypass patients suffering uniform injury. Study solutions were administered to maintain physiologic endpoints: heart rate, blood pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. The groups were similar with respect to age, body surface area, operative procedure, intraoperative fluid status, and intraoperative and postoperative red cell transfusion requirements. HS patients required 30% less fluid than NS patients and were in negative fluid balance during the study (-1,715 +/- 732 ml/24 hr, HS, vs. +266 +/- 825 ml/24 hr, NS; p less than 0.01). In contrast, NS patients were in positive fluid balance after 8 hours. Moreover, HS patients experienced less chest tube drainage than NS patients (981 +/- 88 ml, HS, vs. 1,700 +/- 285 ml, NS; p less than 0.01). Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamic measurements, oxygen delivery, oxygen consumption, and shunt fraction did not differ between the two groups. Serum sodium and osmolality increased in the HS group and peaked at 12 hours (145.4 +/- 1.4 mEq/L and 308.7 +/- 2.0 mOsm/kg, respectively) and correlated with the volume of HS infused (correlation coefficient = 0.81). No deaths occurred and no complication was attributed the hypertonicity of the solution. We conclude that 1.8% hypertonic saline is a safe alternative to isotonic crystalloid therapy in the fluid management of postoperative patients. Decreased third-space losses may occur with HS as suggested by the lower thoracic losses in the HS group; 1.8% NaCl may be the preferred solution in situations where excess free water administration is not desired, and where interstitial edema is detrimental to function and/or survival. To evaluate the use of 250 mL of a 7.5% sodium chloride solution, both with and without added dextran 70, for the prehospital resuscitation of hypotensive trauma patients.
                Double-blind randomized trial.
                Six trauma systems served by helicopter transport.
                Injured patients with systolic blood pressures less than 90 mm Hg at any time in the field or during helicopter transport.
                Infusion of study solution, in the field or during transport, followed by conventional isotonic solutions as needed. Solutions studied in four cohorts were as follows: (1) lactated Ringer's; (2) 7.5% sodium chloride (hypertonic saline); (3) 7.5% sodium chloride combined with 6% dextran 70; and (4) 7.5% sodium chloride combined with 12% dextran 70.
                Blood pressure response; survival to time of hospital discharge among the treatment groups; and survival compared with that predicted by norms from the Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS).
                The mean (+/- SD) change in systolic blood pressure on arrival in the emergency department was significantly higher in the hypertonic saline solution group than that in the lactated Ringer's solution group (34 +/- 46 vs 11 +/- 49 mm Hg, P < .03). Overall survival in the four treatment groups was 49%, 60%, 56%, and 45% (not statistically significant). Survival in the hypertonic saline solution group, however, was significantly higher than that predicted by the MTOS norms (60% vs 48%, P < .001). Survival to hospital discharge in patients with baseline Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 8 or less was correlated with treatment group (P < .05 by logistic regression and P < .01 by Cox proportional-hazards analysis; with survival in the hypertonic saline solution group [34%] vs lactated Ringer's solution group [12%]).
                Prehospital infusion of 250 mL of 7.5% sodium chloride is associated with an increase in blood pressure and an increase in survival to hospital discharge compared with survival predicted by the MTOS norms. Patients with low baseline Glasgow Coma Scale scores seem to benefit the most from 7.5% sodium chloride resuscitation. Hypertonic saline solution without added dextran 70 is as effective as the more expensive solutions that contain dextran 70. Forty-six patients with severe pulmonary insufficiency were prospectively studied to compare the effects of resuscitation with either crystalloid or colloid. By random number, 26 patients received RL and 20 patients received 5 per cent ALB to maintain hemodynamic stability. Groups were comparable with respect to the cause of pulmonary insufficiency, age and sex. For the duration of the study and at 48 hours, there was no statistically significant difference between groups with respect to the following: cardiac index, colloid osmotic pressure (COP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), COP-PCWP gradient, right and left ventricular stroke work indices, and amount of constant positive airway pressure required for treatment. Both groups had a significant improvement in intrapulmonary shunt (Qs/Qt) after 24 hours of treatment. The Qs/Qt in the ALB group was significantly lower than the RL group at the termination of the study, but this did not affect outcome. The RL group required more fluid than the ALB group, but the difference was not statistically significant. No clinical advantage was found for either solution in this study. We evaluated the potential side effects of rapidly infusing 250 mL of either 7.5% sodium chloride or 7.5% sodium chloride per 6% dextran 70, using lactated Ringer's as the control, to 106 critically injured patients in two prospective double-blinded emergency department trials. Eight patients had a significant hyperchloremic acidemia in association with infusion of the hypertonic solutions, but all eight were moribund before infusion and many factors other than hyperchloremia could have contributed to their acidemia. Other blood chemistry changes that might have been associated with the hypertonic solutions, such as hyperosmolality or hypernatremia, were made insignificant by other factors, such as high blood alcohol levels or concomitant administration of sodium bicarbonate. There were no cases of central pontine myelinolysis; bleeding was not potentiated. There was no difficulty with crossmatching of blood. No anaphylactoid reactions occurred. In a setting of limited volume resuscitation, the solutions are likely to have a favorable risk-to-benefit ratio. To compare the efficacy of crystalloid (Normal saline) and colloid (polymer from degraded Gelatin in saline Haemaccel) intravenous fluid in restoration of circulating volume in children with septic shock.
                Prospective, randomized, open-label trial.
                Pediatric Emergency and Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary care referral and teaching hospital. SUBJECTS AND INCLUSION CRITERIA: Sixty patients, between 1 month to 12 years of age, with septic shock, without clinical evidence of organ failure at admission or underlying immunodeficiency.
                Resuscitation with normal saline or polymer from degraded gelatin (Haemaccel) in the boluses rate of 20 mL/kg till hemodynamic stabilization or if central venous pressure (CVP) exceeded 10 mmHg (fluid requirement beyond 40 mL/kg guided by BP and CVP).
                Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, capillary filling time, pulse volume, and blood pressure) were recorded before and during resuscitation, and then 2 hourly for 12 hours. Central venous pressure line was placed within first hour, soon after starting fluids. Estimation of plasma volume and body water was done at the end of first hour of fluid resuscitation.
                Hemodynamic stabilization (heart rate, capillary refill time, systolic BP in normal range), plasma volume at the end of fluid resuscitation and incidence of organ dysfunction.
                31 patients were randomized to normal saline and 29 to gelatin polymer. Both the groups were similar with respect to age, gender, primary diagnosis, initial hemodynamic parameters and PRISM score. Pneumonia (n = 22; 36%), gut-associated sepsis (n = 13), and dengue hemorrhagic fever (n = 11) were the common primary diagnosis. Initial hemodynamic stabilization was achieved in all. The mean (SD plasma volume (saline--53.4 (2.0 mL/kg, gelatin polymer--53.2 (1.9 mL/kg), extracellular fluid volume, total body water and interstitial fluid volume at the end of first hour of resuscitation were similar. The requirement of inotropes, incidence of organ dysfunction and case fatality rate (Saline--29%, gelatin polymer--31%), were similar in two groups.
                Both normal saline and gelatin polymer solution were equally effective as resuscitation fluid with respect to restoration of plasma volume and hemodynamic stability. Normal saline upto 110 mL/kg, and gelatin polymer solution upto 70 mL/kg may be required in first hour for successful fluid resuscitation of septic shock in children. The infusion of small volumes of hypertonic saline solution or hypertonic saline plus dextran 70 is remarkably effective in restoring adequate hemodynamic conditions after hypovolemic shock. This prospective double-blind study compares the immediate hemodynamic effects of a bolus infusion of 7.5% NaCl or 7.5% NaCl plus 6% dextran 70 (both 2400 mOsm/L) in severe hypovolemia.
                One hundred five adult patients admitted in hypovolemic shock (systolic blood pressure less than 80 mm Hg) were revived on arrival to the emergency room and administration of a 250 ml intravenous bolus of hypertonic saline solution (n = 35), hypertonic saline plus dextran (n = 35), or isotonic saline solution (n = 35). This infusion was immediately followed by standard crystalloid and blood replacement until systolic pressure reached 100 mm Hg. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured every 5 minutes, and all intravenous infusions were registered. Plasma volume expansion was calculated from plasma protein concentration measurements. Patients were followed up throughout their hospital course, and results of treatment were recorded.
                At the end of the infusion period, and 5 and 10 minutes after infusion, MAP was significantly higher in patients receiving either hypertonic solution, compared with the group receiving isotonic solution. All groups showed similar trends toward restoration of hemodynamic parameters thereafter. The calculated plasma volume expansion, immediately after the bolus infusion, was significantly higher (24.1% +/- 1.8% and 24.9% +/- 1.1%) in the hypertonic groups, compared with isotonic groups (7.9% +/- 1.3%). Significantly greater volumes of fluids were required to restore systolic pressure in the patients receiving isotonic saline solution than in the groups receiving hypertonic solution. There were no significant differences between the groups receiving hypertonic solutions. The incidence of complications was low, and the mortality rate was similar in all groups.
                Infusion of 250 ml hypertonic saline solution in patients with severe hypovolemia was not related to any complications, nor did it affect mortality rates; it improved MAP significantly, acutely expanded plasma volume by 24%, and reduced significantly the volumes of crystalloids and blood required in their resuscitation. To determine optimal fluid management after elective aortic surgery we compared postoperative administration of 5% dextrose Ringer's lactate solution (102 patients) with 5% dextrose half-normal saline solution (80 patients). For 72 hours after operation, intravenous fluids were titrated to maintain urine output between 50 and 100 ml/hr. The group receiving 5% dextrose Ringer's lactate required less intravenous volume per day (2005 +/- 138 ml [mean +/- standard error of the mean] vs. 2701 +/- 145 ml, p less than 0.05), gained less weight (0.8 +/- 0.2 kg vs. 3.2 +/- 0.2 kg, p less than 0.05), and sustained less hyponatremia (serum sodium reduction, 0.1 mEq/L vs. 4.5 mEq/L, p less than 0.05). The group receiving 5% dextrose Ringer's lactate exhibited consistently lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (7.3 +/- 1.0 mm Hg vs. 11.4 +/- 1.9 mm Hg) and required treatment for fluid overload in 9 of 102 instances compared with 30 of 80 instances with hypotonic saline solution (p less than 0.05). The patients receiving 5% dextrose Ringer's lactate maintained higher arterial PO2 at 40% forced inspiratory oxygen (PaO2, 83 +/- 3 torr vs. PaO2, 67 +/- 5 torr, p less than 0.05). Optimal fluid management was approached by the use of 5% dextrose Ringer's lactate solution postoperatively. The use of hypotonic saline solution after aortic surgery offered no advantage and predisposed the patient to volume overload. To better define the serum osmolar and compositional changes associated with the infusion of a large volume of hypertonic saline solution (sodium of 250 milliequivalents per liter), we compared resuscitation using a hypertonic crystalloid (HSL) to Ringer's lactate (RL) in 52 patients undergoing aortic reconstruction. There were no differences between the groups in any of the preoperative measurements, the duration of operation, operative blood loss or transfusion requirement. The RL group required 9.5 liters of fluid intraoperatively as compared with 6.3 liters required by the HSL group (p less than 0.01). There was no significant difference between the groups in the amount of sodium infused to achieve resuscitation or in the sodium balance at the end of the study period. Hypernatremia (average maximum serum sodium: 157 milliequivalents per liter) and hyperosmolarity (average maximum serum osmolarity: 320 milliosmoles per liter) resolved in the HSL group within 48 hours. Correction of the hyperosmolar state was thought to be due to the judicious administration of free water and a decrease in renal free water clearance. The HSL group required significantly greater potassium administration during the early postoperative period due to increased kaluresis. HSL is safe and effective for use in the resuscitation of moderate blood volume deficit. Changes in serum sodium values and in osmolarity resolve rapidly. The serum potassium level should be monitored closely and replaced aggressively. Small volume infusions of hypertonic saline combined with dextran are very effective in resuscitating animals that have been subjected to hemorrhagic shock, and seem to be effective in resuscitating trauma patients with severe injuries. In this study, the contribution of the dextran component was investigated in a prospective, three-armed, double-blind, randomized trial. Trauma patients transported by ambulance to the hospital with a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or less were given 250 mL of (1) normal saline (NS); (2) 7.5% NaCl (HS, for hypertonic saline); or (3) 7.5% NaCl in 6% dextran 70 (HSD). Infusion of the study solution was followed by administration of conventional isotonic fluids as the patients' conditions indicated. By predetermined hypothesis, the observed survival rates in the three treatment groups were compared with the predicted survival rates from the TRISS methodology. The 7.5% NaCl solution significantly improved upon the predicted survival for the entire cohort and for high-risk patients when compared with the survival estimates from the TRISS methodology. The addition of a colloid, in the form of 6% dextran 70, did not offer any additional benefit, at least in this setting of rapid urban transport. The effects of hemodynamic resuscitation with protein-containing or balanced salt solution were studied prospectively in 29 patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery. Blood loss was replaced with packed red cells and extracellular volume with either Ringer's Lactate (RL) or 5% albumin in Ringer's lactate (ALB). Fluids were given to maintain the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) equal to or within 5 torr above preoperative (PO) levels, the cardiac output (CO) equal to or greater than preoperative values, and the urine output at least 50 ml/hr. Serum colloid osmotic pressure (COP), CO, PCWP, the gradient between COP and PCWP (COP-PCWP), and intrapulmonary shunt (Qs/Qt) were measured PO, intraoperatively (IO), and daily for 3 days. The measured variables were similar PO in both groups. Operation time, estimated blood loss, and transfusions were similar. Total fluids received for resuscitation (day of operation) was 11.3 +/- 0.8 liters (RL) and 6.2 +/- 0.4 liters (ALB). Fluid balance at the end of resuscitation was 8.4 +/- 0.8 liters (RL) and 3.4 +/- 0.5 liters (ALB). Maximum decrease in COP was 40% (P less than 0.001) in the RL group and was insignificant in the ALB group. The COP-PCWP decreased from 11 +/- 1 to 2 +/- 1 in RL (P less than 0.001) and insignificantly in ALB. Qs/Qt increased slightly in both groups following operation but was not different between groups. Fluid balance, total fluid infused, sodium balance, total sodium infused, COP, or COP-PCWP did not significantly correlate with Qs/Qt. Two patients in the ALB group experienced pulmonary edema associated with normal COPs and elevated PCWPs. There were no cases of pulmonary edema associated with low COPs and normal PCWPs in the crystalloid group. These data seriously question the necessity to maintain COP by using protein-containing solutions during acute hemodynamic resuscitation. When titrated to physiological end points, even large volumes of balanced salt solutions are tolerated well.
This review does not give us enough data to be able to say whether hypertonic crystalloid is better than isotonic and near isotonic crystalloid for the resuscitation of patients with trauma or burns, or those undergoing surgery. However, the confidence intervals are wide and do not exclude clinically significant differences. Further trials which clearly state the type and amount of fluid used and that are large enough to detect a clinically important difference are needed.