Famciclovir for the treatment of acute herpes zoster: effects on acute disease and postherpetic neuralgia. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Collaborative Famciclovir Herpes Zoster Study Group. Ganciclovir ophthalmic gel (Virgan; 0.15%) in the treatment of herpes simplex keratitis. Oral acyclovir prophylaxis against herpes simplex virus in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia patients receiving remission induction chemotherapy. A randomised double blind, placebo controlled trial. Treatment of herpes simplex gingivostomatitis with aciclovir in children: a randomised double blind placebo controlled study. Acyclovir given as prophylaxis against oral ulcers in acute myeloid leukaemia: randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Acyclovir prophylaxis against herpes simplex virus infection in patients with leukemia. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Oral acyclovir prophylactic treatment of herpes simplex infection after bone marrow transplantation. Oral valacyclovir as prophylaxis against herpes simplex virus reactivation during high dose chemotherapy for leukemia. Acyclovir prophylaxis in bone marrow transplant recipients. Acyclovir and vidarabine in the treatment of ulcerative herpes simplex keratitis. Ganciclovir ophthalmic gel, 0.15%: a valuable tool for treating ocular herpes. Acyclovir suppression to prevent recurrent genital herpes at delivery. Valacyclovir prophylaxis to prevent recurrent herpes at delivery: a randomized clinical trial. Treatment of herpes simplex keratitis: comparison of acyclovir and vidarabine. Prevention of lower respiratory herpes simplex virus infection with acyclovir in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Oral acyclovir for prevention of herpes simplex virus reactivation after marrow transplantation. Oral valacyclovir versus intravenous acyclovir in preventing herpes simplex virus infections in autologous stem cell transplant recipients.
To document the effects of treatment with famciclovir on the acute signs and symptoms of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia.
                A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial.
                36 centers in the United States, Canada, and Australia.
                419 immunocompetent adults with uncomplicated herpes zoster.
                Patients were assigned within 72 hours of rash onset to famciclovir, 500 mg; famciclovir, 750 mg; or placebo, three times daily for 7 days.
                Lesions were assessed daily for as long as 14 days until full crusting occurred and then weekly until the lesions healed. Viral cultures were obtained daily while vesicles were present. Pain was assessed at each of the visits at which lesions were examined and then monthly for 5 months after the lesions healed. Safety was assessed throughout the study.
                Famciclovir was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of placebo. Famciclovir accelerated lesion healing and reduced the duration of viral shedding. Most importantly, famciclovir recipients had faster resolution of postherpetic neuralgia (approximately twofold faster) than placebo recipients; differences between the placebo group and both the 500-mg famciclovir group (hazard ratio, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1 to 2.7]) and the 750-mg famciclovir group (hazard ratio, 1.9 [CI, 1.2 to 2.9]) were statistically significant (P = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). The median duration of postherpetic neuralgia was reduced by approximately 2 months.
                Oral famciclovir, 500 mg or 750 mg three times daily for 7 days, is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for herpes zoster that decreases the duration of the disease's most debilitating complication, postherpetic neuralgia. Ganciclovir is a broad-spectrum virustatic agent. Its efficacy and safety after ocular application have been demonstrated in studies of herpetic keratitis in rabbits. Two strengths of ganciclovir gel (0.05 and 0.15%) were compared with 3% acyclovir ointment in the treatment of superficial herpes simplex keratitis in humans.
                Two multicenter randomized clinical trials were carried out in Africa (Trial 1) and Europe (Trial 2). Sixty-seven patients (Trial 1) and 37 patients (Trial 2) from herpetic ulceration were recruited.
                The results showed no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups, although the healing rates tended to be better in the group receiving 0.15% ganciclovir gel, with healing rates of 85% (Trial 1) and 83% (Trial 2) as compared with 72% (Trial 1) and 71% (Trial 2) in the group receiving acyclovir ointment. Local tolerance was found to be superior with the gel formulation of ganciclovir with fewer complaints of discomfort (stinging, burning) or blurred vision after application of the drug. Systemic absorption of the drug was low. No hematologic changes were detected.
                These findings support the efficacy of ganciclovir gel in the treatment of ulcerative herpes simplex keratitis and demonstrate its superior local tolerance when compared with acyclovir ointment. Forty-one patients receiving remission induction chemotherapy with vincristine, adriamycin and prednisolone (VAP) for high grade lymphoma or acute lymphoblastic leukaemia were entered into a double blind, placebo controlled trial of oral acyclovir prophylaxis against herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection. The dose of acyclovir was 200 mg four times daily for the duration of chemotherapy (six weeks). Of the 40 evaluable patients, 20 were randomised to each arm. Prophylactic oral acyclovir significantly reduced the incidence of clinical HSV infection from 60% on placebo to 5% acyclovir (P less than 0.001), and the incidence of viral isolates from 70% on placebo to 5% on acyclovir (P less than 0.001). To examine the efficacy of aciclovir suspension for treating herpetic gingivostomatitis in young children.
                Randomised double blind placebo controlled study.
                Day care unit of a tertiary paediatric hospital.
                72 children aged 1-6 years with clinical manifestations of gingivostomatitis lasting less than 72 hours; 61 children with cultures positive for herpes simplex virus finished the study.
                Duration of oral lesions, fever, eating and drinking difficulties, and viral shedding.
                Aciclovir suspension 15 mg/kg five times a day for seven days, or placebo.
                Children receiving aciclovir had oral lesions for a shorter period than children receiving placebo (median 4 v 10 days (difference 6 days, 95% confidence interval 4.0 to 8.0)) and earlier disappearance of the following signs and symptoms: fever (1 v 3 days (2 days, 0.8 to 3.2)); extraoral lesions (lesions around the mouth but outside the oral cavity) (0 v 5.5 days (5.5 days, 1.3 to 4.7)); eating difficulties (4 v 7 days (3 days, 1.31 to 4.69)); and drinking difficulties (3 v 6 days (3 days, 1.1 to 4.9)). Viral shedding was significantly shorter in the group treated with aciclovir (1 v 5 days (4 days, 2.9 to 5.1)).
                Oral aciclovir treatment for herpetic gingivostomatitis, started within the first three days of onset, shortens the duration of all clinical manifestations and the infectivity of affected children. Further studies are needed to evaluate the ideal dose and length of treatment. To evaluate (a) the prophylactic effect of the antiherpetic drug acyclovir on oral ulcers in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia receiving remission induction chemotherapy and thus (b), indirectly, the role of herpes simplex virus in the aetiology of these ulcers.
                Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.
                74 herpes simplex virus seropositive patients aged 18-84. Thirty seven patients received acyclovir (800 mg by mouth daily) and 37 placebo. The patients were examined daily for 28 days.
                Occurrence of herpes labialis, intraoral ulcers, and acute necrotising ulcerative gingivitis.
                The two populations were comparable in age, sex, type of antineoplastic treatment, and history of herpes labialis. Acute oral infections occurred in 25 of the acyclovir treated patients and 36 of the placebo treated patients (relative risk 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.55 to 0.87)). This difference was due to a reduction in the incidence of herpes labialis (one case versus eight cases; relative risk 0.13 (0.02 to 0.95)), intraoral ulcers excluding the soft palate (one case versus 13 cases; relative risk 0.08 (0.01 to 0.56)), and acute necrotising ulcerative gingivitis (one case versus eight cases; relative risk 0.13 (0.02 to 0.95)). However, ulcers on the soft palate were diagnosed with similar frequency in the two groups. Isolation of herpes simplex virus type 1 in saliva was reduced from 15 cases in the placebo group to one case in the acyclovir group (relative risk 0.07 (0.01 to 0.48)).
                Intraoral ulcers excluding the soft palate are most often due to infection with herpes simplex virus, whereas ulcers on the soft palate have a non-herpetic aetiology. The findings suggest that acute necrotising ulcerative gingivitis may also be due to herpes simplex virus. Prophylaxis with acyclovir should be considered for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia during remission induction therapy. Twenty-nine adult patients with acute leukemia receiving timed sequential chemotherapy participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of acyclovir prophylaxis against reactivated herpes simplex virus infection. Patients with pretreatment antibody titers of 1:16 or greater received acyclovir or placebo starting 4 days after their initial chemotherapy. Treatment was given either for 32 days or until the patients were discharged from the hospital or until a culture-positive herpes simplex virus infection was found. Culture-positive herpes simplex virus infection developed in 11 of 15 patients who received placebo. No infection appeared in 14 patients who received acyclovir (p less than 0.00005). No obvious acute drug toxicity was seen. Recurrent infection was seen in 6 of 14 patients after cessation of acyclovir when retreated with chemotherapy, suggesting no effect on viral latency in these 6 patients. Acyclovir provided highly effective prophylaxis against reactivated herpes simplex virus infections in adult patients with acute leukemia receiving timed sequential chemotherapy. In a double-blind controlled study, oral acyclovir has been compared to a placebo in a series of 39 consecutive patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. A dose of 200 mg was given every 6 h from day 8 to day 35 after transplantation. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown the good absorption of the drug despite intestinal damage related to chemoradiotherapy or gut graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); there was no sign of toxicity. The protection against herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection was complete in the treated group when compared to the control group even in patients with high anti-HSV antibody titres. The same protection was observed against cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. The incidence of HSV and CMV was the same in both groups after treatment ended. This study confirms the efficacy of acyclovir against HSV infection and possibly against CMV infection when it is given prophylactically after bone marrow transplantation. Reactivation of herpes simplex virus is a common event in patients undergoing dose-intensive remission induction or consolidation chemotherapy of acute leukemia, for which either intravenous or oral acyclovir provides effective prophylaxis. This drug's short serum half-life and low oral bioavailability make frequent dosing necessary, however, and we therefore sought to determine if the pro-drug valacyclovir, which has improved bioavailability, could be successfully substituted for this indication. Eighty-one patients with leukemia were randomized to receive either 500 mg or 1,000 mg of valacyclovir orally every 8 h and followed clinically, as well as with serial surveillance cultures. Over a total of 1,979 days on study between the groups, and 380 throat cultures, no documented episodes of herpes simplex reactivation were noted. Valacyclovir was tolerated well with no evident drug-related toxicities. We conclude that valacyclovir at either of the two doses studied can be safely substituted for oral or intravenous acyclovir, and that it provides effective prophylaxis against reactivation of herpes simplex virus in this patient population. Forty-two patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation were included in a randomised, double-blind and placebo controlled trial of prolonged acyclovir prophylaxis against infections with viruses of the herpes group. Twenty patients were allocated to receive acyclovir and 22 to receive placebo. Acyclovir or placebo was administered i.v. at a dose of 250 mg/m2 twice daily, starting 5 days before transplantation. At 5 weeks after transplantation, administration was changed to tablets, 400 mg three times daily (children less than 6 years, 200 mg three times daily) and continued until 6 months after transplantation. In the placebo group, 10 acute herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections occurred in 7 patients (5 HSV-1 and 2 HSV-2), and another patient repeatedly shed HSV in throat washings. Five patients developed herpes zoster. Among patients receiving acyclovir only one episode of HSV infection occurred and no herpes zoster. The difference in the number of infection episodes and the number of infected patients was strongly significant (p = 0.0002 and 0.0017, respectively). The only acyclovir patient who reactivated HSV was terminally ill, and it is highly likely that she did not absorb a sufficient amount of the orally administered drug to control infection. All HSV and varicella zoster virus (VZV) infections were reactivations, and 9 of 10 patients who developed HSV infections or shed virus had a pre-transplantation HSV IgG titer of greater than 10 000 (ELISA). Acyclovir had no effect on cytomegalovirus (CMV), time of engraftment, or graft versus host disease (GVHD). Apart from a possible allergic reaction (skin rash) to acyclovir tablets, no adverse reactions were seen during this long prophylaxis with acyclovir. In a masked controlled study, we treated 41 patients who had active herpes simplex corneal ulcers with either 3% acyclovir of 3% vidarabine ointment five times daily for 14 days. There was no statistically significant difference between the two drugs with reference to mean healing time, efficacy of healing, development of stromal keratitis or iritis, post-treatment visual acuity, or adverse reaction. Ocular herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection remains a major cause of corneal blindness. Several topical and oral antiviral medications have been used to treat herpetic keratitis. Advances in topical ophthalmic antivirals have been made over the past several decades. The first antivirals that were discovered were cytotoxic, while the antivirals developed more recently, such as acyclovir and ganciclovir, have exceeded these drugs in both efficacy and tolerability. Commercially available outside of the US since 1996, ganciclovir ophthalmic gel, 0.15% (GCV 0.15%, European tradename: Virgan((R))) is sold in more than 30 countries and has become the standard of care in treating acute herpetic keratitis. GCV 0.15% has been studied in animal models of ocular herpes, in healthy volunteers, and in several clinical studies. It has been found to be safe and effective at treating acute superficial herpetic keratitis. Previous preclinical studies of ganciclovir have shown activity against several common adenovirus strains and one recent clinical study demonstrated clinical effect against adenoviral conjunctivitis. This review is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of the GCV 0.15%, including a brief summary of the etiology and available treatments for ocular HSV, an explanation of GCV 0.15% mechanism of action, a compendium of preclinical and clinical GCV 0.15% studies, and an introduction into new areas of interest involving this drug. To determine if suppressive acyclovir near term decreased the frequency of clinical recurrences at delivery in women with recurrent genital herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection.
                We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial in 234 women with recurrent genital herpes. Women with genital infection of any frequency were enrolled. Patients received either suppressive oral acyclovir 400 mg three times daily or an identical placebo after 36 weeks' gestation. Clinical lesions were identified, and HSV cultures were obtained at delivery. The frequencies of clinical and subclinical HSV recurrences at delivery were evaluated.
                Six percent of patients treated with acyclovir, and 14% of patients treated with placebo had clinical HSV at delivery (p = 0.046). No patients in the acyclovir group had positive HSV cultures, compared with 6% of placebo-treated patients (p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in subclinical HSV shedding in the acyclovir group (0%) compared with the placebo-treated group (3%) (p = 0.102).
                Suppressive acyclovir therapy significantly decreased the incidence of clinical genital herpes and the overall incidence of HSV excretion at delivery in patients with previous herpes infection. To measure the efficacy of valacyclovir suppression in late pregnancy to reduce the incidence of recurrent genital herpes in labor and subsequent cesarean delivery.
                A total of 350 pregnant women with a history of genital herpes were assigned randomly to oral valacyclovir 500 mg twice a day or an identical placebo from 36 weeks of gestation until delivery. In labor, vulvovaginal herpes simplex virus (HSV) culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) specimens were collected. Vaginal delivery was permitted if no clinical recurrence or prodromal symptoms were present. Neonatal HSV cultures and laboratory tests were obtained, and infants were followed up for 1 month after delivery. Data were analyzed using chi2 and Student t tests.
                One hundred seventy women treated with valacyclovir and 168 women treated with placebo were evaluated. Eighty-two percent of the women had recurrent genital herpes; 12% had first episode, nonprimary genital herpes; and 6% had first episode, primary genital herpes. At delivery, 28 women (8%) had recurrent genital herpes requiring cesarean delivery: 4% in the valacyclovir group and 13% in the placebo group (P = .009). Herpes simplex virus was detected by culture in 2% of the valacyclovir group and 9% [corrected] of the placebo group (P =.02). No infants were diagnosed with neonatal HSV, and there were no significant differences in neonatal complications. There were no significant differences in maternal or obstetric complications in either group.
                Valacyclovir suppression after 36 weeks of gestation significantly reduces HSV shedding and recurrent genital herpes requiring cesarean delivery.
                I. At three university centres 66 patients presenting with herpetic dendritic or geographic ulcers participated in a double-blind comparative study of 3% acyclovir and 3% vidarabine ointment. There was healing in 31 (97%) of the 32 patients treated with acyclovir, in a mean time of 6.3 days, and in 30 (88%) of the 34 treated with vidarabine, in a mean time of 7.1 days. The two medications were statistically equally effective, no difference being demonstrated in the healing rate, in the frequency of punctate epithelial keratitis or stromal keratitis, or in the final visual acuity. Herpes simplex virus (HSV) type I commonly occurs in the lower respiratory tract (LRT) of seriously ill patients, particularly those with the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but it is not known whether HSV is a benign mucosal colonizer or a pathogen. The aims of this study were to determine whether the antiviral agent acyclovir could prevent this occurrence, and if so, whether prevention improved the outcome. Forty-five patients with ARDS underwent double-blind randomization into a treatment group (22 subjects) who received prophylactic acyclovir intravenously, 5 mg/kg every 8 h, and a control group (23 subjects). Upper and lower respiratory secretions were examined for the presence of HSV before randomization and twice weekly thereafter. Seven patients were excluded because of HSV detection prior to treatment. There were no significant differences between the remaining 17 acyclovir and 21 control patients in age, sex, distribution of primary diagnostic categories, and severity of primary illness. Only 1 patient (6%) in the acyclovir group developed HSV after treatment compared with 15 (71%) in the control group (p less than 0.001), but there was no improvement in the acyclovir group in the severity of respiratory failure, the duration of ventilator support (acyclovir, 20 +/- 19 days; control, 14 +/- 11 days), or mortality (acyclovir, 8 of 17, 47%; control, 9 of 21, 43%). We conclude that acyclovir is effective in preventing the high incidence of HSV in patients with ARDS, but that this prevention does not improve outcome. Routine prophylaxis of HSV is not recommended. Oral acyclovir was found to be safe and effective for the prevention of herpes simplex virus reactivation after marrow transplantation in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Acyclovir or placebo was administered to 49 patients for 5 weeks beginning 1 week before transplantation: 5 of 24 patients receiving acyclovir developed herpes simplex virus infection during prophylaxis, compared to 17 of 25 patients receiving placebo (p less than 0.01). The median time to first virus reactivation was significantly longer among patients receiving acyclovir (78 days versus 9 days after transplant, p = 0.006). The effect was even more pronounced when the analysis was adjusted for drug compliance: Among patients taking a minimum of 40% of their prescribed drug, acyclovir was 96% virologically effective and 100% clinically effective during the period of administration. Acyclovir use was also associated with significantly more rapid marrow engraftment in patients receiving methotrexate. No virus resistant to acyclovir was isolated. Oral acyclovir provides effective prophylaxis against reactivation of herpes simplex virus among severely immunosuppressed patients able to take orally administered drugs. Patients who are seropositive for herpes simplex virus (HSV) and are undergoing autologous marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation require prophylaxis for HSV infection. Most prophylaxis regimens have used intravenous acyclovir (ACY). Oral valacyclovir (VAL), the L-valyl ester of ACY, can be used to achieve plasma concentrations equivalent to levels achieved with intravenous ACY. In this study, adults undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation were randomized to receive ACY, 250 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) every 12 hours from day 0 to engraftment, or VAL, 1 g orally every 12 hours from day 0 to engraftment. The primary study objective was to compare cost of HSV prophylaxis between study groups. Thirty patients were randomized to receive either oral VAL (n = 14) or IV ACY (n = 16) prophylaxis. Mean pharmacy cost of HSV prophylaxis in the patient group randomized to IV ACY was $1080 versus $320 for the group randomized initially to VAL. This study demonstrates the feasibility and significant cost savings of using oral VAL for HSV prophylaxis.
There is evidence that aciclovir is efficacious in the prevention and treatment of herpes simplex virus infections. There is no evidence that valaciclovir is more efficacious than aciclovir, or that a high dose of valaciclovir is better than a low dose of valaciclovir. There is evidence that as a prophylaxis, placebo is more efficacious than prostaglandin E. However, in all included trials, risk of bias is unclear.