Comparative efficacy of once-daily therapy with inhaled corticosteroid, leukotriene antagonist or sustained-release theophylline in patients with mild persistent asthma. Role of regular treatment with inhaled corticosteroid or leukotriene receptor antagonist in mild intermittent asthma. Comparative efficacy and anti-inflammatory profile of once-daily therapy with leukotriene antagonist or low-dose inhaled corticosteroid in patients with mild persistent asthma. Randomised, placebo controlled trial of effect of a leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast, on tapering inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients. Pilot study to assess the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis. Long-term comparison of 3 controller regimens for mild-moderate persistent childhood asthma: the Pediatric Asthma Controller Trial. Response profiles to fluticasone and montelukast in mild-to-moderate persistent childhood asthma. Effect of inhaled corticosteroids on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with mild asthma. Predicting short term response to anti-inflammatory therapy in young children with asthma. A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter, dose-reduction trial of the minimal effective doses of budesonide and fluticasone dry-powder inhalers in adults with mild to moderate asthma. Effectiveness and safety of inhaled corticosteroids in controlling acute asthma attacks in children who were treated in the emergency department: a controlled comparative study with oral prednisolone. Comparison of inhaled salmeterol and oral zafirlukast in asthmatic patients using concomitant inhaled corticosteroids. Leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast, can reduce the need for inhaled steroid while maintaining the clinical stability of asthmatic patients. Long-acting beta2-agonist monotherapy vs continued therapy with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with persistent asthma: a randomized controlled trial. Endocrine and lung function in asthmatic children on inhaled corticosteroids. Leukotriene antagonist prevents exacerbation of asthma during reduction of high-dose inhaled corticosteroid. The Tokyo Joshi-Idai Asthma Research Group. High-dose and low-dose systemic corticosteroids are equally efficient in acute severe asthma. Corticosteroids in status asthmaticus. High doses of inhaled corticosteroids in unstable chronic asthma. A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Comparison of second controller medications in addition to inhaled corticosteroid in patients with moderate asthma. Zafirlukast versus budesonide on bronchial reactivity in subjects with mild-persistent asthma. Comparison of fluticasone propionate and sodium cromoglycate for the treatment of childhood asthma (an open parallel group study). Zafirlukast improves asthma control in patients receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Formoterol, montelukast, and budesonide in asthmatic children: effect on lung function and exhaled nitric oxide. Hydrofluoroalkane-134A beclomethasone or chlorofluorocarbon fluticasone: effect on small airways in poorly controlled asthma. Children with mild asthma: do they benefit from inhaled corticosteroids? Early parenteral corticosteroid administration in acute asthma. Randomised trial of an inhaled beta2 agonist, inhaled corticosteroid and their combination in the treatment of asthma. Dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids under concomitant medication with montelukast in patients with asthma. A randomized controlled trial of inhaled flunisolide in the management of acute asthma in children. Smoking affects response to inhaled corticosteroids or leukotriene receptor antagonists in asthma. [A fixed combination of fluticasone and salmeterol permits better control of asthma than a beclomethasone dipropionate and montelukast combination]. Poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: can using a single inhaler containing budesonide and formoterol help? Therapeutic ratio of inhaled corticosteroids in adult asthma. A dose-range comparison between fluticasone propionate and budesonide, measuring their effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and adrenal cortex function. Starting with a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids in primary care asthma treatment. An inhaled steroid improves markers of airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma. Placebo controlled trial of systemic corticosteroids in acute childhood asthma. Effectiveness of montelukast versus budesonide on quality of life and bronchial reactivity in subjects with mild-persistent asthma. Cost effectiveness of leukotriene receptor antagonists versus long-acting beta-2 agonists as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: a pragmatic trial. Inhaled corticosteroids decrease vascularity of the bronchial mucosa in patients with asthma. Oral montelukast treatment of preschool-aged children with acute asthma. Randomised controlled trial of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Randomised controlled trial of montelukast plus inhaled budesonide versus double dose inhaled budesonide in adult patients with asthma. Comparative study of budesonide inhalation suspension and montelukast in young children with mild persistent asthma. Montelukast vs. inhaled low-dose budesonide as monotherapy in the treatment of mild persistent asthma: a randomized double blind controlled trial. Methodological aspects on clinical trials with inhaled corticosteroids: results of two comparisons between two steroid aerosols in patients with asthma. Treatment of allergic rhinitis with intranasal corticosteroids in patients with mild asthma: effect on lower airway responsiveness. Early administration of corticosteroids in emergency room treatment of acute asthma.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the inhaled budesonide, sustained-release theophylline and montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in patients with mild persistent asthma. In this single-center, randomized, parallel-group study that not designed blindly and placebo-controlled manner, 74 patients with mild persistent asthma were treated with either inhaled budesonide 400 microg once daily, oral montelukast 10 mg once daily, or sustained-release theophylline 400 mg once daily for 3 months. In all three treatment groups, improvements were attained in overall asthma control. Asthma symptom scores and supplemental beta2-agonist use were quite the same in all three treatment groups (P>0.05). Although inhaled budesonide group resulted in significantly greater improvements compared with the other two groups in the lung functions (P<0.05), the changes in FEV1 and PEF are within the baseline variability and there was no statistically significant difference among the groups when analyzed by treatment month (P>0.05). Exacerbations of asthma were experienced by 16% of the patients in the montekulast group, by 12.5% of the patients in the theophylline group, and by none of the patients in the budesonide group. The adverse event in each of the three groups was 12%, 16% and 16.7%, respectively. It is concluded that the most important clinical parameters do not point that one of the treatments is more effective than others. Treatment with inhaled corticosteroid is preferred, but sustained-release theophylline and leukotriene antagonists are alternative controller medications in mild persistent asthma. Current guidelines for asthma treatment do not recommend daily maintenance therapy in patients with mild intermittent (step 1) asthma. However, because there is increasing evidence that airway inflammation is present even in this patient group, maintenance anti-inflammatory therapy may be considered. We investigated the clinical impact of regular treatment with the inhaled corticosteroid beclomethasone dipropionate and the leukotriene receptor antagonist pranlukast in the patients concerned. The study was a randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial. Eighty-five symptomatic patients with newly diagnosed mild intermittent asthma having normal pulmonary function were assigned beclomethasone or pranlukast for 8 weeks. Then, these medications were stopped for the next 16 weeks. Main outcome measures were asthma symptoms, pulmonary function, and airway inflammation. Treatment with beclomethasone and pranlukast significantly increased forced expiratory volume in 1 second and peak expiratory flow from baseline and decreased asthma symptom scores and sputum eosinophil counts and eosinophil cationic protein contents. After discontinuation of the treatment, symptom scores remained unchanged, but pulmonary function and airway inflammation were aggravated and then returned to the baseline levels. Therefore, maintenance therapy with inhaled corticosteroid or leukotriene receptor antagonist can provide further improvements in asthma symptoms, pulmonary function, and airway inflammation, and discontinuation of the therapy causes worsening of asthma, indicating that stopping or interrupting anti-inflammatory therapy may not be advisable in patients with symptomatic mild intermittent asthma. Current guidelines advocate the use of preventative anti-inflammatory therapy for mild persistent asthma.
                We compared the efficacy and anti-inflammatory profiles of a leukotriene receptor antagonist and a low dose of inhaled corticosteroid in patients with mild persistent asthma.
                Twenty-one adult patients with mild asthma received 4 weeks of either once-daily inhaled hydrofluoroalkane triamcinolone acetonide (450 microg/day ex-actuator dose) or oral montelukast (10 mg/day) in a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blinded crossover study. Measurements were made before and after 2 and 4 weeks of each treatment.
                At the endpoint (after 4 weeks), triamcinolone and montelukast had improved the primary outcome (provocative dose of methacholine required to produce a 20% fall in FEV(1)) in comparison with placebo (P <.05), there being no difference between the treatments (1.09-fold; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.63). Triamcinolone was better than placebo or montelukast for effects on all other surrogate inflammatory markers (P <.05), including exhaled nitric oxide, blood eosinophils, serum eosinophil cationic protein, plasma intracellular circulating adhesion molecule 1, and plasma E-selectin. Both treatments improved (P <.05) morning and evening peak flow, nighttime beta2-agonist use, and symptoms in comparison with placebo, though triamcinolone was better than montelukast (P <.05) with regard to peak flow. Triamcinolone produced suppression (P <.05) of overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine and serum osteocalcin.
                Once-daily inhaled corticosteroid and leukotriene antagonist improved the primary outcome variable of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to a similar degree. To determine the ability of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, to allow tapering of inhaled corticosteroids in clinically stable asthmatic patients.
                Double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, parallel group study. After a single blind placebo run in period, during which (at most) two inhaled corticosteroids dose decreases occurred, qualifying, clinically stable patients were allocated randomly to receive montelukast (10 mg tablet) or matching placebo once daily at bedtime for up to 12 weeks.
                23 academic asthma centres in United States, Canada, and Europe.
                226 clinically stable patients with chronic asthma receiving high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (113 randomised to montelukast and 113 to placebo).
                Every 2 weeks, the inhaled corticosteroids dose was tapered, maintained, or increased (rescue) based on a standardised clinical score.
                Last tolerated dose of inhaled corticosteroids.
                Compared with placebo, montelukast allowed significant (P=0. 046) reduction in the inhaled corticosteroid dose (montelukast 47% v placebo 30%; least square mean difference 17.6%, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 34.8). Fewer patients on montelukast (18 (16%) v 34 (30%) placebo, P=0.01) required discontinuation because of failed rescue.
                Montelukast reduces the need for inhaled corticosteroids among patients requiring moderate to high doses of corticosteroid to maintain asthma control. To determine the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis.
                We report a pilot study of 49 patients with cystic fibrosis and moderate to severe bronchial obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 second < or = 55% of the predicted value); 25 patients were given inhaled corticosteroids for 30 days (1500 micrograms of beclomethasone via spacer), and 24 patients had the same standard treatment but no inhaled corticosteroids.
                Forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and airway resistance showed significant improvement in both study groups, but thoracic gas volume and the diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide improved significantly only in the group given inhaled corticosteroids. When concomitant medications were taken into account, analysis of variance confirmed a significant effect of inhaled corticosteroids on the improvement of thoracic gas volume.
                Inhaled corticosteroids in combination with standard treatment can contribute to the improvement of lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis and moderate to severe bronchial obstruction. Our preliminary data seem encouraging enough to warrant a multicenter, long-term, blind control study. More evidence is needed on which to base recommendations for treatment of mild-moderate persistent asthma in school-aged children.
                The Pediatric Asthma Controller Trial (PACT) compared the effectiveness of 3 regimens in achieving asthma control.
                A total of 285 children (ages 6-14 years) with mild-moderate persistent asthma on the basis of symptoms, and with FEV(1) >or= 80% predicted and methacholine FEV(1) PC(20) <or= 12.5 mg/mL, were randomized to 1 of 3 double-blind 48-week treatments: fluticasone 100 microg twice daily (fluticasone monotherapy), fluticasone 100 microg/salmeterol 50 microg in the morning and salmeterol 50 mug in the evening (PACT combination), and montelukast 5 mg in the evening. Outcomes included asthma control days (primary outcome), exacerbations, humanistic measurements, and pulmonary function measurements.
                Fluticasone monotherapy and PACT combination were comparable in many patient-measured outcomes, including percent of asthma control days, but fluticasone monotherapy was superior for clinic-measured FEV(1)/forced vital capacity (P = .015), maximum bronchodilator response (P = .009), exhaled nitric oxide (P < .001), and PC(20) (P < .001). Fluticasone monotherapy was superior to montelukast for asthma control days (64.2% vs 52.5%; P = .004) and for all other control outcomes. Growth over 48 weeks was not statistically different (fluticasone, 5.3 cm; PACT combination, 5.3 cm; montelukast, 5.7 cm).
                Both fluticasone monotherapy and PACT combination achieved greater improvements in asthma control days than montelukast. However, fluticasone monotherapy was superior to PACT combination in achieving other dimensions of asthma control. Growth was similar in all groups.
                Therefore, of the regimens tested, the PACT study findings favor fluticasone monotherapy in treating children with mild-moderate persistent asthma with FEV(1) >or= 80% predicted, confirming current guideline recommendations. Outcome data are needed to base recommendations for controller asthma medication use in school-aged children.
                We sought to determine intraindividual and interindividual response profiles and predictors of response to an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA).
                An ICS, fluticasone propionate (100 mug twice daily), and an LTRA, montelukast (5-10 mg nightly, age dependent), were administered to children ages 6 to 17 years with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma using only as-needed bronchodilators in a multicenter, double-masked, 2-sequence, 16-week crossover trial. Clinical, pulmonary, and inflammatory responses to these controllers were evaluated.
                Improvements in most clinical asthma control measures occurred with both controllers. However, clinical outcomes (asthma control days [ACDs], the validated Asthma Control Questionnaire, and albuterol use), pulmonary responses (FEV(1)/forced vital capacity, peak expiratory flow variability, morning peak expiratory flow, and measures of impedance), and inflammatory biomarkers (exhaled nitric oxide [eNO]) improved significantly more with fluticasone than with montelukast treatment. eNO was both a predictor of ACDs (P = .011) and a response indicator (P = .003) in discriminating the difference in ACD response between fluticasone and montelukast.
                The more favorable clinical, pulmonary, and inflammatory responses to an ICS than to an LTRA provide pediatric-based group evidence to support ICSs as the preferred first-line therapy for mild-to-moderate persistent asthma in children. eNO, as a predictor of response, might help to identify individual children not receiving controller medication who achieve a greater improvement in ACDs with an ICS compared with an LTRA. We studied the effect of inhaled budesonide on bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in twenty mild asthmatic patients. The study was conducted as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Before entering the study, the patients performed methacholine inhalation challenge (MIC) using a reservoir method to assess BHR. Then, they were randomly allocated to receive budesonide turbuhaler (200 micrograms/dose) or placebo turbuhaler two inhalations, twice daily for eight weeks. During the study, each patient recorded daily asthma score and daily number of puffs of beta 2 agonist and they were assessed at weeks 4 and 8. At the end of the treatment, MIC was repeated again. Patients receiving budesonide showed a significant improvement in airway responsiveness compared with those receiving placebo (p < 0.05). They also showed a significant improvement in asthma severity score and a significant decrease in beta 2 agonist bronchodilator use. This study also suggested that inhaled corticosteroids may be the primary treatment in patients, even with mild asthmatic and well-controlled symptoms. Currently available anti-inflammatory treatment for young children with asthma includes inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and the leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) montelukast.
                To evaluate potential biomarkers of predicting short-term (6-week) response to ICS and LTRAs in children with asthma.
                A total of 102 children aged 4 to 7 years with episodic asthma were enrolled in an open labelled single-centre study. Biomarkers and asthma characteristics were evaluated as predictors of treatment. Of 102 patients 45 became symptomatic during observation and were randomised to treatment either to montelukast or fluticasone for 6 weeks.
                Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) increased with both treatments: FEV1 at randomisation was 90.2% and after therapy 106.8% with fluticasone vs. 90.8% and 103.7% for montelukast, respectively, showing that montelukast and fluticasone were equally effective in this age group (p = 0.44). Strong correlations to a favourable treatment response were pre-bronchodilatory FEV1 (p < 0.001) and airway reversibility (p = 0.04) at time of randomisation. None of the other biomarkers (methacholine testing, exhaled nitric oxide [eNO], presence of allergy, total Immunoglobulin E [IgE], cumulative specific IgE, eosinophils and parental smoking) were predictive.
                Despite the small sample size and the open-label design, the study suggests that the use of pre-bronchodilatory FEV1 and airway reversibility appears to be a good indicator of short-term anti-inflammatory therapy in young children with asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are established first-line anti-inflammatory treatment for asthma. Clinical trials comparing inhaled corticosteroids must take into consideration that because of their excellent effect at low doses, they typically induce a near-maximal response in asthma patients.
                The aim of the present dose-response study was to estimate the minimal effective doses (MEDs) of budesonide and of fluticasone propionate via dry-powder inhaler in adults with mild to moderate asthma.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter, dose-reduction trial performed in adults to compare these 2 inhaled corticosteroids. After a 4- to 6-week run-in period with beclomethasone dipropionate 2000 pg/d, patients fulfilling defined criteria for asthma control were randomly allocated to treatment with budesonide or fluticasone, both administered BID at a total of 800 pg/d. At 5-week intervals, the dose was reduced to 400 and then 200 pg/d (200 and 100 pg BID) if asthma control was maintained according to further defined criteria. The MED was defined as the last dose level before deterioration of asthma control.
                Subjects were 197 asthmatic patients with a mean age of 40.6 years in the budesonide group and 41.5 years in the fluticasone group. In both groups, baseline mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) was 79.4% of the predicted normal volume and baseline mean FEV(1) reversibility was 22.3%. The median MED for both groups was 400 microg/d, with no detectable difference in dis-tributions. The budesonide-to-fluticasone ratio for the geometric mean MED was 123% (95% CI, 99-153 [not significant]). No statistically significant differences regarding lung function, symptom scores, or rescue medication usage were found between the treatment groups during the first treatment period. Adverse-event profiles were similar in both groups, and no unexpected adverse events were considered to be caused by the study drugs.
                This effect-controlled study did not detect a statistically significant difference between the MEDs for budesonide and fluticasone via dry-powder inhaler in adults with mild to moderate asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids have a greater antiinflammatory potency and fewer systemic effects than intravenous, intramuscular, or oral corticosteroids. However, their role in acute asthma has not been established. We prospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids in controlling moderately severe acute asthma attacks in children who were treated in the emergency department.
                Children who were treated in the emergency department with moderately severe asthma attacks after receiving treatment with inhaled terbutaline were allocated by double-blind design to receive 1 dose of either 1600 micro(g) budesonide turbohaler or 2 mg/kg prednisolone. The pulmonary index score and peak expiratory flow rate were measured hourly for the first 4 hours. After discharge the children were treated with the same initial doses given 4 times daily, followed by a 25% reduction in dose every second day for 1 week. Parents recorded asthma symptoms and use of beta-2 agonists on a daily diary card. Serum cortisol concentration was measured at the end of weeks 1 and 3.
                Twenty-two children (11 in each group) with similar baseline parameters completed the study. There was a similar improvement in pulmonary index score and peak expiratory flow rate in the 2 groups. Children treated with budesonide showed an earlier clinical response than those given prednisolone, who also showed a decrease in serum cortisol concentration.
                In children with moderately severe asthma attacks who were treated in the emergency department, a short-term dose schedule of inhaled budesonide turbohaler, starting with a high dose and followed by a decrease over 1 week, is at least as effective as oral prednisolone, without suppressing serum cortisol concentration. For asthmatic patients who remain symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroids, augmenting the therapy with additional long-term control medication is advocated. Long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists and leukotriene modifiers are 2 therapeutic alternatives in the long-term controller class.
                To compare the addition of a long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist to the addition of an oral leukotriene modifier for asthma therapy in patients who remain symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroids.
                Double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter clinical studies.
                54 outpatient clinical centers.
                429 male and female patients with asthma 12 years of age and older who were symptomatic while taking inhaled corticosteroids.
                Salmeterol xinafoate 42 mcg via metered dose inhaler twice daily or oral zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily.
                Pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, supplemental albuterol use, asthma quality of life scores, and adverse events.
                Inhaled salmeterol provided significantly greater improvement in pulmonary function as well as significantly greater relief of both daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms compared with oral zafirlukast in patients concurrently treated with inhaled corticosteroids. The use of supplemental albuterol was reduced to a greater extent with salmeterol compared with zafirlukast. Patients treated with salmeterol showed significantly greater improvement in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores and were satisfied with how fast, how long, and how well the medication worked compared with patients in the zafirlukast group. Both treatments were well tolerated and demonstrated similar safety profiles.
                In patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma not sufficiently controlled with inhaled corticosteroids alone, the combination of inhaled salmeterol and inhaled corticosteroids is superior to the combination of oral zafirlukast and inhaled corticosteroids as stepwise therapy. Oral leukotriene receptor antagonists have been shown to have efficacy in chronic asthma.
                To determine whether the addition of montelukast could lead to a reduction in inhaled corticosteroid dose without a significant decrease in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR).
                After a 4-week run-in period, 191 moderate-to-severe asthmatic patients whose asthma had been well controlled with daily inhaled corticosteroid therapy (beclometasone dipropionate 800 to 1600 micro g/day), were randomly assigned to one of two treatments - placebo (n = 98) or montelukast 10 mg once daily (n = 93) - for a 24-week, multicentre, double-blind, treatment period. At the beginning of the active treatment period, the daily dose of inhaled corticosteroid was halved in all of the patients. In addition, the inhaled corticosteroid dose was subsequently titrated every 8 weeks, based on PEFR, asthma symptoms and beta-agonist use.
                After 8 weeks of a 50% reduction in inhaled corticosteroid use, morning PEFR increased by 5.3 +/- 32.3 L/min from baseline in patients receiving montelukast and significantly decreased by 6.9 +/- 29.0 L/min in those receiving placebo (P = 0.035). In addition, evening PEFR significantly decreased by 9.8 +/- 28.5 L/min (P = 0.003) in the placebo group, but was maintained in the montelukast group. In spite of a subsequent 50% reduction in the inhaled corticosteroid dose every 8 weeks, morning and evening PEFRs were maintained over the 24-week treatment period in the montelukast group; PEFR significantly decreased in the placebo group. There was a significant difference between the two groups with regard to morning PEFR, therapy score and asthmatic score at weeks 8, 16 and 24, as well as evening PEFR at week 8. However, the symptom scores were not significantly different between the two groups or within each group.
                These data suggest that montelukast reduces the need for inhaled corticosteroids while maintaining asthma control over a 24-week period. Therefore, montelukast may be useful for long-term treatment in patients with asthma who require high doses of inhaled corticosteroids. Long-acting beta(2)-agonists are prescribed for patients with persistent asthma and are sometimes used without inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). No evidence exists, however, to support their use as monotherapy in adults with persistent asthma.
                To examine the effectiveness of salmeterol xinafoate, a long-acting beta(2)-agonist, as replacement therapy in patients whose asthma is well controlled by low-dose triamcinolone acetonide, an ICS.
                A 28-week, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial conducted at 6 National Institutes of Health-sponsored, university-based ambulatory care centers from February 1997 to January 1999.
                One hundred sixty-four patients aged 12 through 65 years with persistent asthma that was well controlled during a 6-week run-in period of treatment with inhaled triamcinolone (400 microg twice per day).
                Patients were randomly assigned to continue triamcinolone therapy (400 microg twice per day; n = 54) or switch to salmeterol (42 microg twice per day; n = 54) or to placebo (n = 56) for 16 weeks, after which all patients received placebo for an additional 6-week run-out period.
                Change in morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), self-assessed asthma symptom scores, rescue albuterol use, asthma-specific quality-of-life scores, treatment failure, asthma exacerbation, bronchial reactivity, and markers of airway inflammation, compared among the 3 treatment groups.
                During the 16-week randomized treatment period, no significant differences between the salmeterol and triamcinolone groups were observed for conventional outcomes of clinical studies of asthma therapy-morning PEF, evening PEF, asthma symptom scores, rescue albuterol sulfate use, or quality of life. Both active treatments were superior to placebo. However, the salmeterol group had more treatment failures than the triamcinolone group (13/54 [24%] vs 3/54 [6%]; P =.004), as well as more asthma exacerbations (11/54 [20%] vs 4/54 [7%]; P =.04), greater increases in median (interquartile range) sputum eosinophils (2.4% [0.0% to 10.6%] vs -0.1% [-0.7% to 0.3%]; P<.001), eosinophil cationic protein (71 [-2 to 430] U/L vs -4 [-31 to 56] U/L; P =.005), and tryptase (3.1 [2.1 to 7.6] ng/mL vs 0.0 [0.0 to 0.7] ng/mL; P<.001). The duration of benefit when patients were switched from active treatment to placebo after 22 weeks of randomized treatment was not significantly longer in the triamcinolone group than in the salmeterol group.
                Patients with persistent asthma well controlled by low doses of triamcinolone cannot be switched to salmeterol monotherapy without risk of clinically significant loss of asthma control. The safety of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of chronic asthma has been questioned. In a prospective crossover study asthmatic children not controlled on other medications were commenced on beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or budesonide (BUD), both administered at the dose of 200 micrograms twice per day for 2 wk each in randomized order. Recordings at home included twice daily symptom scores, peak expiratory flow readings, and the use of additional antiasthma medications. Before and after each treatment period the patients were admitted for overnight blood sampling for cortisol, ACTH, and growth hormone, 24-h urine collections for cortisol, and detailed lung function tests. A total of 12 children completed the study. The nocturnal serum cortisol production was significantly reduced by 27 and 35% after 2 and 4 wk of treatment (p = 0.005, p = 0.004; Wilcoxon test), and the urinary free cortisol showed a similar reduction of 33 and 48% (p = 0.023, p = 0.005). Such suppression could be shown on both drugs, BDP and BUD, and there was no significant difference between them. The ACTH and growth hormone values were not significantly changed on any treatment. Lung function tests showed an impressive improvement in FVC, FEV1, FEF50, and FEF25 after 2 wk of treatment regardless of the medication. Differences in lung function improvements between the two drugs were very small and not of clinical relevance. The observations indicate that even low-dose inhaled corticosteroids in the form of BDP or BUD have a systemic effect, which emphasizes the importance of using the minimum dose compatible with good control of asthma. To test whether the leukotriene antagonist ONO-1078 (pranlukast) prevents asthma exacerbations during reduction of high-dose inhaled corticosteroid, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 79 asthma patients requiring high doses (1,500 microg/d or more) of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDI) for clinical control (duration of asthma, 11.0 +/- 3.1 yr; duration of BDI treatment, 0.5 +/- 0.3 yr; FEV1 percentage of predicted, 80.7 +/- 2.0%). After a 2-wk run-in period, the doses of BDI were halved, while the patients were assigned to receive orally ONO-1078, 450 mg twice daily, or placebo. In the placebo group FEV1 decreased by 0.33 +/- 0.20 L after 6 wk (p < 0.001). Likewise, morning and evening PEF decreased by 46 +/- 7 L/min and 18 +/- 6 L/min, respectively. By contrast these variables were sustained above baseline in the ONO-1078 group. The number of daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms and the use of beta2-agonist increased in the placebo group, whereas they remained unchanged in the ONO-1078 group. In the placebo group concentrations of serum eosinophil cationic protein and exhaled nitric oxide increased (p = 0.007 and p = 0.025, respectively), compared with no change in the ONO-1078 group. Therefore, the leukotriene antagonist ONO-1078 prevents the asthma deterioration provoked by a 6-wk reduction of the dose of inhaled BDI into half. The optimal amount of systemic corticosteroids to be used in acute severe asthma remains an unresolved issue. In this double-blind, randomized study we compared two doses of methylprednisolone (1 vs 6 mg.kg-1 q.d.) in asthmatics presenting with an acute severe asthma attack, unresponsive to an intensive beta 2-agonist regimen administered during a run-in period. Concurrent therapy, including oxygen, inhaled and intravenous salbutamol, and aminophylline was strictly standardized. The response was assessed by serial bedside spirometry. The primary outcome measurement was forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (expressed as percentage of predicted values) at 24 and 44 h. The trial was designed in order to achieve a statistical power of 90%. Twenty three patients were included in the low-dose group and 24 in the high-dose group. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic profiles, history of asthma, and severity of the current attack. Improvement in pulmonary function was similar in both groups. At 44 h, the mean (+/- SD) FEV1 values were 53 +/- 22 and 45 +/- 14% in the low and in the high-dose group respectively (NS). We conclude that high dose systemic corticosteroids offer no further benefit over low-doses in the treatment of severe acute asthma. Nineteen children who were not steroid dependent and were hospitalized in status asthmaticus were studied to evaluate the effect of corticosteroids. They were randomized into two groups. Each group received salbutamol inhalations and intravenous aminophylline therapy. One group received 7 mg/kg hydrocortisone intravenously every six hours; the other group served as a control. Each group showed significant improvement in clinical score and peak expiratory flow rate after 36 hours; there was no statistical difference in the degree of improvement. Six of ten steroid-treated children and six of nine controls achieved a PEFR of 50% predicted by 36 hours. The response to inhaled salbutamol was similar in each group. The results show that in the first 36 hours of therapy, corticosteroids have no additive effect on the bronchodilator response of aminophylline and salbutamol and do not hasten the recovery of nonsteroid-dependent children in status asthmaticus. Although the results show that an inhaled sympathomimetic drug is beneficial in status asthmaticus, corticosteroid therapy does not increase the responsiveness of the airways to these agents. In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 1,500 micrograms/day was compared to placebo in 43 chronic asthmatic patients uncontrolled by inhaled salbutamol and oral theophylline. During the prestudy period, a test of maximal steroid reversibility with oral prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg/day for 14 days was performed. The therapeutic response was measured over an 8-wk period as the ability to maintain the clinical improvement and the optimal pulmonary function induced by prednisolone. During the study, severe asthma exacerbation occurred in one (5%) of the 21 patients who received BDP and in 15 (78%) of the 22 patients who received placebo (p less than 0.001). In patients who received BDP, FEV1 and peak expiratory flow (PEF) remained above the optimal postprednisolone value, with a trend to improvement during the 8-wk study period. In patients who received placebo, FEV1 and PEF decreased and remained below the optimal value. We conclude that, in chronic asthma, inhaled BDP 1,500 micrograms/day maintains the optimal pulmonary function in addition to the clinical benefit induced by a short course of oral corticosteroids. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the second controller medications (long-acting beta2-agonist, leukotriene receptor antagonist and sustained-release theophylline) used in addition to inhaler corticosteroid treatment in moderate persistent asthma. A total of 64 patients with asthma, in the moderate persistent asthma category, were divided into three groups. Patients, all of whom were concurrently using inhaled corticosteroid (Budesonide 400 microg twice daily), were treated for 3 months with either inhaled formoterol 9 microg twice daily (first group), oral zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily (second group), or sustained-release theophylline 400 mg once daily (third group). All of the patients were subjected to assessments on the subject of peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), asthma symptom scores (daytime and night-time), supplemental terbutalin use, asthma exacerbations and adverse events. Over the 3-month treatment period. In all of the three groups, significant improvements were recorded in the lung function, asthma symptom scores and supplemental terbutalin use criteria, as a result oftreatments applied. Formoterol treatment resulted in significantly greater and earlier improvements compared with the other two groups in several criteria: PEF variability (17.9 +/- 2.5; 21.9 +/- 3.2; 23.7 +/- 3.3; P < 0.001); asthma symptom score (daytime) (1.6 +/- 0.5; 1 +/- 0.5; 2.0 +/- 0,5; P < 0.05); asthma symptom score (night-time) (1.2 +/- 0.4; 2.2 +/- 0.5; 16 +/- 0.6; P < 0001); and supplement alter butalin use (1.2 +/- 0.3; 1.8 +/- 0.5; 1.7 +/- 0.5; P < 0.05). However, at the end of the treatment, in all of the three groups studied, improvements were attained in overall asthma control and there was no statistical difference among the groups. Although there were no side effects which required the discontinuation of the treatment, it was observed that the maximum side effect was in the second group (20%, 31.6% and 20%, respectively). In conclusion, in patients who still have symptoms on treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, the addition of a long-acting beta2-agonist, leukotriene antagonists or sustained-release theophylline to the treatment is a logical approach, and, in addition to inhaled corticosteroids, any one of these second controller medications may be chosen in patients with moderate asthma. Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases in children and adults. Recent studies have shown that in asthmatic patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids there is a better diseases control when adding a second drug, than increasing the corticosteroids dose. The aim of this study has been to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerance of zafirlukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, versus budesonide in clinically steady patients with mild persistent bronchial asthma. We have enrolled 36 subjects non smokers, with mild persistent bronchial asthma and 12 healthy subjects as control group. At the beginning of this study and at the end of the treatment (8 weeks), all patients underwent complete clinical work-up, pulmonary function testing (FEV1, PEF and FVC) and methacholine challenge test. The patients were divided into 3 groups: group A) 20 mg of zafirlukast twice a day; group B) 400 mg of budesonide twice a day; group C) 20 mg of zafirlukast twice a day and 400 mg of budesonide twice a day. Basal FEV1 and PEF presented no significant statistical differences between control subjects and patients of group A, B and C. After eight weeks there were no significant changes for FEV1 and PEF among the three groups. After therapy a strong significant increase of PD20 was documented in group A (p&#x003C;0.005), group B (p&#x003C;0.001) and group C (p&#x003C;0.005), respect to baseline values. The antileukotriene drugs could be taken as an alternative drug, or in association with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids, in patients with mild persistent asthma, both for their clinical effectiveness and their easy ingestion, which is confirmed in compliance studies on inhaled steroids. Inhaled corticosteroids are highly effective in the treatment of asthma at all ages and their use in younger children is increasing. As concerns exist about the long-term systemic side-effects of high dose inhaled corticosteroids, current guidelines continue to recommend sodium cromoglycate (SCG) as first line regular medication for children with frequent symptoms. Few published studies have compared the safety and efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids with SCG in children. This study compares SCG with the new inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate (FP), which has theoretical advantages over other currently available corticosteroids due to its negligible oral bioavailability. This was a randomized, open, multi-centre, parallel group comparison of 50 micrograms FP twice daily and 20 mg SCG four times daily over 8 weeks, preceded by a 2-week baseline period. Sixty-two general practices and two hospital centres enrolled 225 asthmatic children aged 4-12 years (110 received FP; 115 received SCG). Outcome measures improved in both groups, with a significant difference in favour of FP for the key variables of mean morning and evening % predicted PEFR and % of symptom-free days and nights. No significant difference was observed for FEV1, or relief medication use. Two children taking FP and 10 children taking SCG withdrew because of adverse events. This study showed that low dose FP was effective and superior to SCG in young children with mild-moderate asthma. Safety studies of longer duration are needed before changing the current recommendations for inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Not all asthma can be adequately controlled, despite the use of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Because cysteinyl-leukotrienes (Cys-LT) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma, we hypothesized that the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast, in combination with high-doses of inhaled corticosteroids, might be efficacious in severe asthma. In a double-blind, parallel group study, 368 chronic adult asthmatic patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids (1,000 to 4,000 microgram/d), who had a predefined level of asthma symptoms during the run in period of the study, were randomly assigned to receive additional treatment with a high dose of zafirlukast (80 mg twice daily) (n = 180) or placebo (n = 188) for 6 wk. Compared with placebo, zafirlukast produced a significant improvement over baseline in the primary study endpoint of mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (18.7 L/min versus 1.5 L/min, p < 0.001), as well as in evening PEFR (p < 0.01), FEV(1) (p < 0.05), daytime symptom score (p < 0.001), and beta(2)-agonist use (p < 0.001). Furthermore, zafirlukast significantly reduced the risk of an exacerbation of asthma (odds ratio [OR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38 to 0.99) and the risk of patients requiring a further increase in asthma controller therapy (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.8). In conclusion, in patients taking high-dose inhaled corticosteroids, zafirlukast improves pulmonary function and asthma symptoms, and reduces the risk of an asthma exacerbation, suggesting that the contribution of leukotrienes to asthma symptoms and exacerbations is not adequately controlled by high-dose inhaled corticosteroids. It has been proposed that asthma control may be achieved in part by minimizing airway inflammation. The simultaneous effects of inhaled steroids associated with long-acting beta-agonists and leukotriene antagonists on pulmonary function and airway inflammation are still largely unexplored in children with moderate persistent asthma.
                The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of add-on therapy with long-acting beta-agonists and leukotriene antagonists on FEV1 and exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) in children.
                Forty-eight steroid-naïve atopic asthmatic children, 7-11 years of age, were randomly treated in four groups for two consecutive one-month periods, as follows: (1) first month: budesonide 200 microg twice daily; second month: budesonide 400 microg twice daily; (2) first month: budesonide 200 microg twice daily+formoterol 9 microg twice daily; second month: budesonide 200 microg twice daily+montelukast 5mg once daily; (3) first month: budesonide 200 microg twice daily+montelukast 5mg once daily; second month budesonide 200 microg+formoterol 9 microg twice daily; (4) first and second month: budesonide 400 microg twice daily.
                All treatments resulted in a significant increase in lung function and a decrease in FENO compared with values at baseline. Budesonide+montelukast in combination was the most effective treatment for reducing FENO levels.
                This study demonstrates that add-on therapy with montelukast plus low-dose budesonide is more effective than the addition of long-acting beta-agonists or doubling the dose of budesonide for controlling FENO in asthmatic children. Inflammation in asthma extends into the small airways (< 2 mm diameter). Most inhaled corticosteroids are suspensions with a particle size > 2 mm. Therefore, inflammation in the small airways of patients with asthma may not be adequately treated with these preparations. Some inhaled corticosteroids, on the other hand, are compounded with alcohol, resulting in a solution producing an aerosol that has a mean particle diameter of < 2 mm. This study was designed to compare the addition of equivalent amounts of two inhaled corticosteroids (one a suspension and one a solution) to the treatment of patients with asthma, which was uncontrolled despite treatment with moderate to high doses of inhaled corticosteroids and usually additional controller medications. The study was performed with 30 patients, > or = 18 years of age. Subjects were randomized in a single-blind fashion to receive, in addition to their current asthma therapy, either CFC-FP 220 microg each morning and 110 microg each evening (n = 10) or HFA-BDP 160 mcg twice daily (n = 20). Pre- and postbronchodilator spirometry, single breath nitrogen washout for closing volume and residual volume by plethysmography were assessed before and after 3 months of therapy. In the subjects who received HFA-BDP, the ratio of closing volume (CV) to vital capacity (VC) and residual volume (RV) decreased significantly (p = 0.0214 and 0.0433, respectively), whereas forced expiratory flow over 25-75% of the vital capacity (FEF25-75%), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and morning peak flow improved significantly (p = 0.0014, 0.0184, and 0.0321). Improvements from baseline of CV, CV/VC, and postbronchodilator FEF25-75%, were statistically significant in the HFA-BDP group compared with the CFC-FP group (p = 0.0049, 0.0194, and 0.0355, respectively). These preliminary findings suggest that the addition of HFA-BDP, compared with CFC-FP in patients with poorly controlled asthma despite receiving moderate to high doses of inhaled steroids, has a greater effect on parameters reflecting small airway patency presumably secondary to reduction in inflammation. In children with mild asthma, who show hardly any abnormalities in pulmonary function, objective measurement of the effect of inhaled corticosteroids is difficult. The short term effect of fluticasone propionate (FP) in these children was evaluated, using both subjective and objective parameters. A total of 68 children (5-10 yrs old) were randomly assigned to either FP 250 microg or placebo twice daily as metered-dose inhaler via spacer during 12 weeks. Symptom scores, use of rescue medication, wheezing, parent global evaluation and pulmonary function tests including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and bronchial responsiveness (provocation dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20)) were evaluated. FP-treated versus placebo-treated children showed significant changes in percentage symptom-free days, use of beta2-mimetics, morning and evening PEF, FEV1 % pred and wheezing. No significant improvements were found in parent global evaluation, absolute values of FEV1 nor PD20. These findings show that inhaled corticosteroids are effective in children with mild asthma. This effect can be assessed by both objective and subjective parameters. Early start of inhaled corticosteroids should be considered even when pulmonary function is normal. To test the hypothesis that early parenteral corticosteroid administration may be associated with a rapid improvement in airflow obstruction in adult asthmatic patients, a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study was carried out. Forty-five adult asthmatic patients, with initial peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs) of < 200 L/sec received an intravenous bolus of either 125 mg methylprednisolone (MP) or normal saline before any other emergency department treatments. This was immediately followed by 3 aerosol treatments of 2.5 mg of albuterol separated by 20-minute intervals. PEFRs and heart rates were measured over a 1-hour time frame. There was not a significantly higher rate of increase of PEFR in the MP group compared with the saline group. Similarly, the rate of increase in percent PEFR showed a trend to being higher in the saline group (P = .061). There was no significant difference in the proportion of hospitalizations and side effects between the two groups. Adjustment for other variables did not result in a model showing an enhanced PEFR improvement with MP treatment. This study does not support the concept that corticosteroid treatment effects are beneficial within the first hour after administration. Further studies of rapid-acting modalities to enhance bronchodilation are needed in treating acute asthmatics. Although many asthmatic patients are treated with a combination of beta2 agonist and corticosteroid inhalers, the clinical effects of combining the drugs are unknown. Studies on the early asthmatic response to allergen suggest that beta2 agonists may reduce the benefit of inhaled corticosteroids. A study of the effects of combining the drugs on asthma control was undertaken.
                Sixty one subjects with mild to moderate asthma were randomised to a double blind crossover comparison of inhaled budesonide (200-400 microg twice daily), terbutaline (500-1000 microg four times daily), combined treatment, and placebo. Each treatment was given for six weeks following a four week washout period. Ipratropium was used for symptom relief. Treatments were ranked from worst (1) to best (4) based on need for oral steroid, mean morning peak flow, nocturnal awakening, ipratropium use, and asthma symptoms. Lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness were measured before and after each treatment.
                Evaluable data for all four treatments were obtained from 47 subjects. The mean rank of each treatment was: placebo = 2.05; terbutaline = 2.13; budesonide = 2.48; combined treatment = 3.34. Combined treatment was ranked significantly better than any other treatment (p<0.01). Mean (95% CI) morning and evening peak flows were 14 (5 to 23) and 24 (15 to 34) l/min higher, respectively, during combined treatment than during budesonide, and 27 (17 to 37) and 15 (7 to 23) l/min higher than during terbutaline. Asthma symptoms tended to be least frequent during combined treatment but were not significantly different from budesonide alone. There was no significant difference between combined treatment and budesonide alone for lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.
                In this group of mild to moderate asthmatic subjects the combination of beta2 agonist and corticosteroid gave better asthma control than either treatment alone. There was no evidence that regular beta2 agonist treatment impaired the beneficial effect of inhaled corticosteroid. The present study aimed at comparing the effects of a dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids on lung function, indirect measures of airway inflammation and clinical scores during treatment with a leucotriene receptor antagonist. In 50 patients (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 94% predicted), steroid doses (800 microg beclomethasone dipropionate) were first reduced to 50% and then to 25%, for 6 weeks each. One group received a placebo and the other group received montelukast (10 mg). The first reduction did not cause significant effects. During the second, FEV1 and peak expiratory flow decreased in both groups (p<0.001). Daytime symptoms were not altered with placebo but were reduced by montelukast (p<0.05). Night-time symptoms were slightly elevated with placebo (p<0.05) but not montelukast, as well as the use of supplemental salbutamol. Changes in provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20), sputum eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide were mostly nonsignificant for both placebo and montelukast. These data demonstrate that a 75% reduction in the dose of steroid given to patients with asthma led to a deterioration in lung function not prevented by montelukast, whereas changes in clinical state seemed to favour montelukast treatment. It therefore appears that potential effects of montelukast, in the presence of low-dose steroids, could not be attributed to single indices of lung function or airway inflammation. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may provide benefit in the therapy of acute asthma. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that ICS are as effective as oral corticosteroids (OCS) in the management of acute childhood asthma.
                A randomized, masked, placebo-controlled study was conducted in children aged 6 to 16 years seeking emergent care for an acute exacerbation of asthma. Patients were randomized into one of two groups: group 1 (OCS), oral prednisone, 2 mg/kg (maximum of 60 mg/d) for 7 days, and placebo pressurized metered-dose inhaler with valved holding chamber, four inhalations bid; and group 2 (ICS), flunisolide, four inhalations (1 mg) bid for 7 days, and daily placebo tablets. Spirometry (FEV(1)) was performed at baseline, day 3, and day 7 of the study. A symptom diary and twice-daily peak expiratory flow were recorded.
                A total of 58 subjects receiving ICS (n = 27) or OCS (n = 28) were enrolled. Baseline asthma severity, race, gender, and age were balanced between the two groups. chi(2) showed no significant difference in symptom severity between the two groups at any time during the study. FEV(1) percentage of predicted was lower in the ICS group on day 3 (65% vs 78%, p = 0.03) and on day 7 (77% vs 95%, p = 0.002).
                ICS were found to be useful in the management of acute asthma in children; however, spirometry data suggested a more rapid resolution of asthma with OCS. One-quarter to one-third of individuals with asthma smoke, which may affect response to therapy and contribute to poor asthma control.
                To determine if the response to an inhaled corticosteroid or a leukotriene receptor antagonist is attenuated in individuals with asthma who smoke.
                In a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial, 44 nonsmokers and 39 light smokers with mild asthma were assigned randomly to treatment twice daily with inhaled beclomethasone and once daily with oral montelukast.
                Primary outcome was change in prebronchodilator FEV(1) in smokers versus nonsmokers. Secondary outcomes included peak flow, PC(20) methacholine, symptoms, quality of life, and markers of airway inflammation. Despite similar FEV(1), bronchodilator response, and sensitivity to methacholine at baseline, subjects with asthma who smoked had significantly more symptoms, worse quality of life, and lower daily peak flow than nonsmokers. Adherence to therapy did not differ significantly between smokers and nonsmokers, or between treatment arms. Beclomethasone significantly reduced sputum eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in both smokers and nonsmokers, but increased FEV(1) (170 ml, p = 0.0003) only in nonsmokers. Montelukast significantly increased a.m. peak flow in smokers (12.6 L/min, p = 0.002), but not in nonsmokers.
                In subjects with mild asthma who smoke, the response to inhaled corticosteroids is attenuated, suggesting that adjustments to standard therapy may be required to attain asthma control. The greater improvement seen in some outcomes in smokers treated with montelukast suggests that leukotrienes may be important in this setting. Larger prospective studies are required to determine whether leukotriene modifiers can be recommended for managing asthma in patients who smoke. It is now recommended to add an inhaled long-acting beta 2-agonist, or as an alternative, to add a leukotriene-antagonist, in patients whose asthma is insufficiently controlled with an inhaled corticosteroid alone. A randomised, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study was carried out in 246 patients of at least 15 years, whose asthma was not adequately controlled with a medium dose of an inhaled corticosteroid. They received either fluticasone/salmeterol combination 250/50 micrograms one inhalation twice daily or CFC beclomethasone dipropionate 250 micrograms two puffs twice daily plus montelukast 10 mg in the evening for 12 weeks. The mean morning PEFR (main criterion) was significantly (p = 0.017) more improved with fluticasone/salmeterol (+44.2 L/min) than with beclomethasone dipropionate plus montelukast (+31.0 L/min). Other outcomes showed significantly better improvements (p 0.022 Pound) with fluticasone/salmeterol than with beclomethasone plus montelukast. The two treatments were well tolerated. Fluticasone/salmeterol provided a better asthma control than beclomethasone dipropionate plus montelukast in patients insufficiently controlled with an inhaled corticosteroid alone. Poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids is an important problem in asthma management. Previous approaches to improving adherence have had limited success.
                To determine whether treatment with a single inhaler containing a long-acting beta(2)-agonist and a corticosteroid for maintenance treatment and symptom relief can overcome the problem of poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids.
                Randomised, parallel group, open-label trial.
                Forty-four general practices in Nottinghamshire.
                Participants who used less than 70% of their prescribed dose of inhaled corticosteroid and had poorly controlled asthma were randomised to budesonide 200 microg one puff twice daily plus their own short-acting beta(2)-agonist as required (control group), or budesonide/formoterol 200/6 microg one puff once daily and as required (active group) for 6 months. The primary outcome was inhaled corticosteroid dose.
                Seventy-one participants (35 control, 36 active group) were randomised. Adherence with budesonide in the control group was approximately 60% of the prescribed dose. Participants in the active group used approximately 80% more budesonide than participants in the control group (448 versus 252 microg/day, mean difference 196 mug, 95% confidence interval 113 to 279; P<0.001) and were less likely to withdraw from the study (3 versus 13; P<0.01). No safety issues were identified.
                Using a single inhaler for both maintenance treatment and symptom relief approximately doubled the dose of inhaled corticosteroid taken, suggesting this could be a useful strategy to overcome the problems related to poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids. Inhaled corticosteroids have become the mainstay treatment of bronchial asthma. However, simultaneous evaluations of efficacy and side effects are few. This study aimed to compare the relative effect of fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide (BUD) on bronchial responsiveness and endogenous cortisol secretion in adults with asthma. The study was double-blind and included 66 adults with asthma, who were randomized to FP (n = 33) or BUD (n = 33). Prestudy, all participants were clinically stable, using inhaled corticosteroids and hyperresponsive to methacholine. Eligible patients were randomized to three consecutive 2-wk periods with either FP 250 microg twice daily, FP 500 microg twice daily, and FP 1,000 microg twice daily, or BUD 400 microg twice daily, BUD 800 microg twice daily, and BUD 1,600 microg twice daily, delivered by Diskhaler and Turbuhaler, respectively. Before randomization and at the end of each treatment, bronchial methacholine PD(20), 24-h urinary cortisol excretion (24-h UC), plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and blood eosinophils were determined. The relative PD(20) potency between FP and BUD was 2.51 (95% CI, 1.05-5.99; p < 0. 05), while the relative 24-h UC potency was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.44-0.83; p < 0.01). The differential therapeutic ratio (FP/BUD) based on PD(20) potency and 24-h UC was 4.18 (95% CI, 1.16-15.03; p < 0.05). The difference in systemic potency was also seen for plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and blood eosinophils. Therapeutic ratio over a wide dose range, determined by impact on bronchial responsiveness and endogenous corticosteroid production, seems to favor FP. New British guidelines on the treatment of asthma (9) advocate starting with a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids in newly detected asthma patients. We investigated whether initiating inhaled steroid treatment with a higher dose is clinically more effective than a lower dose in steroid naive patients with asthma. The study had a 13-wk randomized, double-blind, parallel design: 1-mo treatment with 400 microg budesonide twice a day, or 100 microg budesonide twice a day by dry powder inhaler, and follow-up treatment period of 2 mo with 200 microg budesonide once daily for all patients. Forty patients started with 400 microg budesonide twice daily, 44 with 100 microg budesonide twice daily. Mean age was 32 yr, baseline FEV1 value 84% predicted, reversibility 9% from baseline, and mean bronchodilator use 1.6 inhalations/d in the run-in period. After 4 wk of treatment with 400 microg and 100 microg budesonide twice daily mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) increased 27 L/min (SD 50), and 38 L/ min (SD 53), respectively (p = 0.30); mean symptom score improved from 1.1 to 0.6 and from 1.1 to 0.5. These effects were maintained in the 2 mo follow-up. This study suggests that starting inhaled corticosteroids at a higher dose is not superior to a lower dose in the treatment of newly detected asthma. Airway inflammation can be demonstrated in mildly asthmatic patients who are not treated with inhaled steroids. Current guidelines recommend that inhaled steroids should be introduced in mild asthmatics who use an inhaled beta2-agonist more than once daily. It was postulated that inhaled steroids can have anti-inflammatory effects in patients with even milder disease. The effect of 4 weeks of treatment with budesonide (800 microg twice daily by Turbohaler) was studied in 10 steroid-naive mildly asthmatic patients (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) = 96+/-1.4% predicted) who required an inhaled beta2-agonist less than one puff daily, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover fashion. Spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), bronchial responsiveness (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20)), and sputum induction were performed before and after each treatment period. Following budesonide treatment, there were significant improvements in FEV1, and PC20, in association with a significant reduction in the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum. Exhaled NO levels tended towards reduction, but the change was nonsignificant. There were also nonsignificant reductions in sputum eosinophil cationic protein and tumour necrosis factor-alpha levels. In conclusion inhaled budesonide can lead to improvements in noninvasive markers of airway inflammation, in association with a small improvement in lung function, even in mildly asthmatic patients who require an inhaled beta2-agonist less than once daily. This suggests a potential benefit of inhaled corticosteroids, even in relatively asymptomatic asthma. In a randomised controlled trial 38 asthmatic children aged 2-11 yr who had not received regular oral or inhaled steroids during the previous year, were treated with a standard regime of nebulised salbutamol and intravenous aminophylline plus either hydrocortisone and oral prednisolone for 5 days, or placebo. The children were observed throughout their hospital stay and for 3 months afterwards. There was a greater fall in heart rates in the steroid treated group on the second day of treatment (mean diff. 16 beats/min) and at discharge (mean diff. 13 beats/min); p less than 0.025. Peak Expiratory Flow Rates recorded in 26 children, 13 in each group, showed more improvement on day 2 in those given steroids (mean diff 16% predicted); p less than 0.05. This difference was not apparent at discharge but 9 children treated with steroids were clinically wheeze-free when they left hospital compared with 3 in the placebo group, p less than 0.05. There were no differences in respiratory rate, pulsus paradoxus and arterial oxygen saturation. Trends in duration of hospital stay and relapse rate during the succeeding 3 months favoured active treatment. These findings support the use of systemic corticosteroids in addition to high dose bronchodilators to treat 'non steroid dependent' children hospitalised with acute severe asthma. Insufficient data exist to evaluate the comparative effects of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) on airway inflammation and quality of life (QoL). The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of montelukast compared to budesonide at different doses on QoL and bronchial reactivity in mild-asthmatic adult patients. 45 subjects with bronchial asthma were randomly assigned to a different treatment and divided in 3 treatment groups: A: 400 mg of budesonide twice a day; B: 10 mg of montelukast daily; C: 10 mg of montelukast daily plus 400 mg of budesonide twice a day. At the beginning of the study and at the end of the treatment period (16 weeks) all patients underwent complete clinical evaluation, pulmonary function testing and methacholine challenge test (MCHt). In group A the increase from baseline was 153.4&amp;#x0025;, in group C was 133.2&amp;#x0025;, and in group B 247.7&amp;#x0025;, the latter increase being statistically significant compared to that in the other 2 groups (p&amp;#x003C; 0.005 Wilcoxon test). In all domains the improvement in quality of life in the group treated with montelukast (group B) was significantly greater than that in the group treated with both medications (group C): in particular, the improvement was consistent in the symptoms (p&amp;#x003C; 0.01) and emotions (p&amp;#x003C; 0.01) domains, and weaker in the physical activity (p&amp;#x003C; 0.05). A similar difference was observed between group B and A, but only in the symptoms (p&amp;#x003C;0.01), emotions (p&amp;#x003C;0.01), and environmental stimuli domains (p&amp;#x003C;0.05). The personal perception of their own disease is important for a correct therapeutic management of asthma. In order to optimize the treatment, a complete adherence of the patient to the treatment itself is required, to be achieved through simplification of therapeutic schedule and easy administration of medications. Montelukast may be considered a valid alternative in the treatment of mild-persistent asthma, both for the clinical and functional benefits and for the great advantage of the once-daily dosage, which consistently improves the compliance with the chronic treatment of the disease. Information is lacking on the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness--in a real-life primary-care setting--of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) and long-acting beta2 adrenergic receptor agonists (beta2 agonists) as add-on therapy for patients whose asthma symptoms are not controlled on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).
                To estimate the cost effectiveness of LTRAs compared with long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy for patients whose asthma symptoms are not controlled on low-dose ICS.
                An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 2-year, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial set in 53 primary-care practices in the UK. Patients aged 12-80 years with asthma insufficiently controlled with ICS (n = 361) were randomly assigned to add-on LTRAs (n = 176) or long-acting beta2 agonists (n = 185). The main outcome measures were the incremental cost per point improvement in the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ), per point improvement in the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and per QALY gained from perspectives of the UK NHS and society.
                Over 2 years, the societal cost per patient receiving LTRAs was pounds sterling 1157 versus pounds sterling 952 for long-acting beta2 agonists, a (significant, adjusted) increase of pounds sterling 214 (95% CI 2, 411) [year 2005 values]. Patients receiving LTRAs experienced a non-significant incremental gain of 0.009 QALYs (95% CI -0.077, 0.103). The incremental cost per QALY gained from the societal (NHS) perspective was pounds sterling 22,589 (pounds sterling 11,919). Uncertainty around this point estimate suggested that, given a maximum willingness to pay of pounds sterling 30,000 per QALY gained, the probability that LTRAs are a cost-effective alternative to long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy was approximately 52% from both societal and NHS perspectives.
                On balance, these results marginally favour the repositioning of LTRAs as a cost-effective alternative to long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy to ICS for asthma. However, there is much uncertainty surrounding the incremental cost effectiveness because of similarity of clinical benefit and broad confidence intervals for differences in healthcare costs.
                UK National Research Register N0547145240; Controlled Clinical Trials ISRCTN99132811. Increased vascularity in airway mucosa is a distinctive feature of airway remodelling in asthma. While corticosteroids have proved most effective in modifying airway inflammation, the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on increased airway mucosal vascularity in asthmatics has been little studied.
                We examined the effect of inhaled corticosteroid on airway vascularity in bronchial biopsy specimens taken from asthmatic patients.
                We studied bronchial biopsies from 28 asthmatic patients before and after treatment with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 800 microg/daily, or placebo, for 6 months in a double-blind manner. Biopsy specimens were evaluated for number of vessels and percentage of area occupied by vessels, using computerized image analysis after staining for type IV collagen in vessel walls. Specimens were also examined for extent of collagen III in the subepithelial basement membrane. In addition, we compared asthmatic specimens with biopsy specimens taken from non-asthmatic control subjects.
                There was a significant increase in number of vessels (P < 0.01) and percent vascularity (P < 0.001) in the submucosa of asthmatic patients compared with control subjects. After 6 months of treatment, we observed significant improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1% and airway responsiveness (P < 0.05, each) in the BDP treatment group compared with the placebo group. This was accompanied by significant decreases in both vessel number and percent vascularity in the airways of BDP-treated patients (P < 0.05, each). We also observed a significant correlation between change in percent vascularity and change in collagen III thickness in the BDP-treated patients (rs = 0.90, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the change in percent vascularity was inversely correlated with both FEV1 (rs = -0.49, P < 0.05) and airway responsiveness (rs = -0.36, P < 0.05).
                These findings suggest that inhaled corticosteroid treatment of asthma reduced airway wall vascularity during airway remodelling. Increased amounts of cysteinyl leukotrienes have been demonstrated in urine samples from asthmatic patients, particularly during exacerbations of asthma. Although the use of leukotriene receptor antagonists has been recommended in the treatment of chronic asthma, no guidelines are available regarding their use in the treatment of acute asthma.
                To investigate the safety and effectiveness of a 4-mg tablet of oral montelukast in addition to short-acting beta2-agonist bronchodilator as the initial treatment in mild to moderate asthma exacerbations in children between 2 and 5 years old.
                Fifty-one patients who were experiencing mild to moderate asthma exacerbation were included in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Each patient received either a 4-mg tablet of montelukast or placebo in addition to inhaled salbutamol and were followed up for 4 hours. The pulmonary index score, respiratory rate, and pulse were determined at baseline and throughout 4 hours after administration.
                Compared with placebo, the pulmonary index scores and respiratory rates were significantly lower in the montelukast group starting at 90 minutes (P = .01). This difference persisted at 120, 180, and 240 minutes of the study (P = .008, P = .02, and P = .048, respectively). At the end of the first hour of treatment, oral steroid need was 20.8% and 38.5% in patients randomized to the montelukast and placebo groups, respectively (P = .22). Hospitalization rates were not different between the 2 treatment groups.
                A single 4-mg tablet of montelukast had the potential to provide additive clinical benefit in mild to moderate acute asthma in preschool-aged children when administered concomitantly with short-acting beta2-agonist bronchodilators as the initial treatment. Inhaled corticosteroids are known to be beneficial for patients with asthma, but their role in treating patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial. A study was undertaken to determine whether inhaled corticosteroids are of functional benefit in patients who did not show improvement with a trial of oral corticosteroids.
                In phase I patients with stable COPD were given a two week course of oral placebo followed by two weeks of prednisone 40 mg per day in a single blind manner to distinguish between responders and non-responders to oral corticosteroids. In phase II a double blind, randomised, parallel group trial of inhaled budesonide 1600 micrograms per day versus placebo was carried out in 79 nonresponders to oral corticosteroids. The primary outcome measure was forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and secondary outcome measures were exercise capacity, dyspnoea with exertion, quality of life, peak expiration flow rate, and respiratory symptoms.
                Randomisation allocated 39 subjects to inhaled corticosteroids and 40 to placebo. There was no difference in the change in FEV1 from baseline between the treatment and placebo groups; mean difference -12 ml (95% CI -88 to 63) at three months and -4 ml (95% CI -95 to 87) at six months. The proportion of patients with a 15% or greater improvement was no higher among those receiving inhaled corticosteroids than in the placebo group at any of the follow up visits. Changes in secondary outcomes were also no different.
                Inhaled corticosteroids, even at high doses, were of no physiological or functional benefit in these patients with advanced COPD. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) affect many inflammatory pathways in asthma but have little impact on cysteinyl leukotrienes. This may partly explain persistent airway inflammation during chronic ICS treatment and failure to achieve adequate asthma control in some patients. This double blind, randomised, parallel group, non-inferiority, multicentre 16 week study compared the clinical benefits of adding montelukast to budesonide with doubling the budesonide dose in adults with asthma.
                After a 1 month single blind run in period, patients inadequately controlled on inhaled budesonide (800 microg/day) were randomised to receive montelukast 10 mg + inhaled budesonide 800 microg/day (n=448) or budesonide 1600 microg/day (n=441) for 12 weeks.
                Both groups showed progressive improvement in several measures of asthma control compared with baseline. Mean morning peak expiratory flow (AM PEF) improved similarly in the last 10 weeks of treatment compared with baseline in both the montelukast + budesonide group and in the double dose budesonide group (33.5 v 30.1 l/min). During days 1-3 after start of treatment, the change in AM PEF from baseline was significantly greater in the montelukast + budesonide group than in the double dose budesonide group (20.1 v 9.6 l/min, p<0.001), indicating faster onset of action in the montelukast group. Both groups showed similar improvements with respect to "as needed" beta agonist use, mean daytime symptom score, nocturnal awakenings, exacerbations, asthma free days, peripheral eosinophil counts, and asthma specific quality of life. Both montelukast + budesonide and double dose budesonide were generally well tolerated.
                The addition of montelukast to inhaled budesonide is an effective and well tolerated alternative to doubling the dose of inhaled budesonide in adult asthma patients experiencing symptoms and inadequate control on budesonide alone. Budesonide inhalation suspension and the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast have demonstrated efficacy in children with mild persistent asthma, but comparative long-term studies in young children are needed.
                To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of budesonide inhalation suspension and montelukast.
                After a run-in period, children 2 to 8 years old with mild asthma or recurrent wheezing were randomized to once-daily budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 mg or once-daily oral montelukast 4 or 5 mg for 52 weeks. Subjects were stepped up to twice-daily budesonide inhalation suspension or oral corticosteroids for mild or severe asthma worsening, respectively. The primary outcome was time to first additional medication for asthma worsening at 52 weeks. Secondary variables included times to the first additional asthma medication measured at 12 and 26 weeks; times to the first asthma exacerbation (mild and severe) measured at 12, 26, and 52 weeks; exacerbation rates (mild and severe) over a period of 52 weeks; diary variables (eg, peak expiratory flow [PEF]); patient-reported outcomes; and Global Physician and Caregiver Assessments.
                No significant between-group differences were observed for time to first additional asthma medication at 52 weeks; however, time to first additional asthma medication was longer (unadjusted P = .050) at 12 weeks and exacerbation rates were lower over a period of 52 weeks (unadjusted P = .034) for budesonide versus montelukast. Time to first severe exacerbation (requiring oral corticosteroids) was similar in both groups, but the percentage of subjects requiring oral corticosteroids over a period of 52 weeks was lower with budesonide (25.5% vs 32.0%). Peak flow and Caregiver and Physician Global Assessments favored budesonide.
                Both treatments provided acceptable asthma control; however, overall measures favored budesonide inhalation suspension over montelukast.
                These findings are consistent with studies in older children demonstrating better outcomes with inhaled corticosteroids versus montelukast. Guidelines recommend daily controller therapy for mild persistent asthma. Montelukast has demonstrated consistent benefit in controlling symptoms of asthma and may be an alternative, orally administered, nonsteroidal agent for treating mild asthma. Aim: To determine whether montelukast is as effective as budesonide in controlling mild persistent asthma as determined by FEV(1).
                Between November 2003 to October 2005, participants aged 5-15 years with recently diagnosed mild persistent asthma (n = 62) were randomized to oral montelukast (5 mg daily) [N(1) = 30] or inhaled budesonide (400 microg per day in two doses) [N(2) = 32] in a single center, double-blind study.
                Baseline demographic and spirometric parameters were comparable. The median (95% confidence interval) percentage predicted FEV(1) was similar in the two groups after 12 weeks of treatment (budesonide: 76.70 (67.96-90.53%), montelukast: 75 (67.40-88.47)%; p = 0.44). There was similar improvement in spirometric parameters and clinical symptom scores in both the groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the need for rescue drugs as well as side effects reported by parents.
                Montelukast is as effective as inhaled budesonide in the treatment of mild persistent asthma in children aged 5-15 years. Montelukast may be used as an alternative to low dose inhaled corticosteroids for management of mild persistent asthma. The efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol (BDA) 100 micrograms q.i.d. was compared with that of budesonide aerosol 10 micrograms q.i.d. in 17 patients. The efficacy of inhaled BDA 100 micrograms q.i.d. was also compared with that of budesonide 50 micrograms q.i.d. with and without an extension tube (Inhalet) attached to the actuator in 23 patients. Both studies included placebo periods. The trials were performed with the cross-over technique in patients with stable asthma. Each treatment was randomized and given in periods of two weeks starting with a run-in period. The patients recorded peak expiratory flow rates (PEF) twice daily and filled in diary cards for cough, wheeze, breathing difficulties and use of beta 2-receptor stimulant aerosol. In the first study the patients came to the hospital twice weekly throughout the trial for spirometry and interview. In the second study they came every second week. Budesonide and BDA were superior to placebo. Budesonide in doses of 100 micrograms and 50 micrograms were as efficacious as BDA 100 micrograms q.i.d., while budesonide 50 micrograms q.i.d. with Inhalet was slightly more effective. Treatment for two weeks was found to be sufficient. For each parameter the average of the last four days of each period was found to be relevant in the comparison. The placebo period should preferably not be placed at random in the trial, but as the last treatment period. The effect of treatment of allergic rhinitis with intranasal corticosteroids on lower airway responsiveness was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Twenty-one young patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and asthma, with documented lower airway hyperresponsiveness (PC20 methacholine < 8 mg/ml), were treated with intranasal aqueous beclomethasone dipropionate and placebo, each given for 4 weeks. Patients recorded rhinitis and asthma symptom scores and monitored peak expiratory flow rates every morning and evening. Patients recorded global assessment of rhinitis and global asthma symptom scores at the beginning and end of each treatment. PC20 methacholine was performed at baseline and at the end of each treatment period. Intranasal beclomethasone dipropionate significantly reduced global rhinitis symptom scores (p = 0.05) after 4 weeks of treatment. Global asthma scores did not change significantly (p = 0.2). Geometric mean PC20 methacholine improved significantly after 4 weeks of intranasal beclomethasone, but not after placebo (p = 0.04). Daily morning and evening rhinitis symptom scores were lower in patients treated with intranasal corticosteroids over the first 4 weeks of treatment, but carryover effect of steroids precluded comparative analysis of the second 4-week block (morning p = 0.06, evening p = 0.03). Morning asthma scores tended to decrease (p = 0.07). Evening asthma scores were significantly decreased at weeks 2 and 3 (p = 0.001, p = 0.02, respectively). No change in peak expiratory flow rate was seen. This study confirms that treatment of inflammation in the upper airways indirectly improves asthma symptoms and decreases bronchial hyperreactivity. Ignoring inflammation in the upper airway may lead to suboptimal results in asthma treatment. To determine the effect of early administration of high-dose intravenous corticosteroids on duration of emergency room treatment and hospital admission rate in patients with acute asthma.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                The emergency room of a large, urban hospital with primary and referral care responsibilities.
                Eighty-one patients from 18 to 45 years of age with acute bronchial asthma and without pneumonitis or other serious underlying illnesses were studied on 91 occasions and were randomly assigned to control or experimental groups.
                The steroid group received 125 mg of intravenous methylprednisolone whereas the control group received intravenous normal saline 30 minutes after initial treatment. Additional treatment included aerosolized metaproterenol and oral theophylline therapy. Six hours after study entry, remaining patients were treated with 40 mg of intravenous methylprednisolone. Hospitalization was mandatory if total treatment time was greater than 12 hours.
                Age, sex, peak expiratory flow at entry, and prevalence of recent corticosteroids use were similar in both groups. Duration of emergency room treatment was 6.7 +/- 4.2 (SD) hours in the steroid group and 6.3 +/- 4.1 hours in the control group (P = 0.66). Hospitalization was necessary in 18% (95% CI, 7% to 30%) of the steroid group and in 13% (CI, 3% to 22%) of the control group. Frequency of return visits for acute asthma 2 days after emergency room discharge was 11% (CI, -1% to 22%) in the steroid group and 13% (CI, 2% to 23%) in the control group.
                These results fail to show any benefit for early administration of corticosteroids in patients with acute asthma. Routine administration of corticosteroids on initial presentation in such patients may not be warranted.
As monotherapy, inhaled corticosteroids display superior efficacy to anti-leukotrienes in adults and children with persistent asthma; the superiority is particularly marked in patients with moderate airway obstruction. On the basis of efficacy, the results support the current guidelines' recommendation that inhaled corticosteroids remain the preferred monotherapy.