Effect of inhaled budesonide on severe steroid-dependent asthma. Low-dose budesonide with the addition of an increased dose during exacerbations is effective in long-term asthma control. On behalf of the Italian Study Group. Effect of budesonide on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and pulmonary function in patients with mild to moderate asthma. High-dose inhaled steroids in the management of asthma. A comparison of the effects of budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate on pulmonary function, symptoms, bronchial responsiveness and the adrenal function. Clinical efficacy of low-dose inhaled budesonide once or twice daily in children with mild asthma not previously treated with steroids. Nebulized budesonide versus oral steroid in severe exacerbations of childhood asthma. Comparison of high and low dose of the inhaled steroid, budesonide, as an initial treatment in newly detected asthma. Formoterol added to low-dose budesonide has no additional antiinflammatory effect in asthmatic patients. High or standard initial dose of budesonide to control mild-to-moderate asthma? Budesonide and formoterol in a single inhaler improves asthma control compared with increasing the dose of corticosteroid in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. Effect of regular terbutaline on the airway response to inhaled budesonide. Adrenal function in asthmatic children treated with inhaled budesonide. Low-dose budesonide improves exercise-induced bronchospasm in schoolchildren. Use of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with mild asthma. Budesonide treatment of moderate and severe asthma in children: a dose-response study. Twelve-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of the efficacy and tolerability of budesonide and formoterol in one metered-dose inhaler compared with budesonide alone and formoterol alone in adolescents and adults with asthma. A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter, dose-reduction trial of the minimal effective doses of budesonide and fluticasone dry-powder inhalers in adults with mild to moderate asthma. Dose-related efficacy of budesonide administered via a dry powder inhaler in the treatment of children with moderate to severe persistent asthma. Bioequivalent doses of budesonide and prednisone in moderate and severe asthma.
Twenty-four patients with severe steroid-dependent asthma participated in a double-blind cross-over study performed in two centers. After a run-in period of 2 weeks when beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) (400 micrograms/day) was used, the patients were treated for 4 weeks with either a high-dose (1600 micrograms/day) or a low-dose (400 micrograms/day) of budesonide (Pulmicort). Thereafter the doses of budesonide were switched and the treatment continued for a further 4-week period. Patients treated with high-dose budesonide displayed significant improvements in airway functions. In addition, subjective scores for cough, sputum production and dyspnoea were more improved in the high-dose group than in the low-dose group. The need for concomitant beta 2-agonist therapy was also significantly reduced during the high-dose treatment. No significant changes in plasma cortisol levels were detected and no adverse effects of importance were registered. The results indicate that high-dose budesonide treatment improves the clinical status of patients with severe steroid-dependent asthma more than a low-dose therapy but without causing systemic side-effects. This study was designed to compare the effects of a 6-month treatment with budesonide 100 microg bid (low dose) and 400 microg bid (standard reference dose) in controlling symptoms and lung function in a group of asthmatics with moderate asthma (baseline FEV(1) > or = 50% and < or = 90% of predicted values) previously treated with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (500 to 1,000 microg/d). Moreover, we investigated whether or not asthma exacerbations could be treated by a short-term increase in the daily dose of budesonide.
                After a 2-week run-in period and 1-month treatment with a high dose of budesonide (800 microg bid), 213 patients with moderate asthma were assigned to randomized treatments. Daily treatment included budesonide (bid) plus an additional treatment in case of exacerbation (qid for 7 days). Treatments were as follows: budesonide 400 microg plus placebo (group 1); budesonide 100 microg plus budesonide 200 microg (group 2); and budesonide 100 microg plus placebo (group 3). Symptoms and a peak expiratory flow (PEF) diary were recorded and lung function was measured each month. An exacerbation was defined as a decrease in PEF > 30% below baseline values on 2 consecutive days.
                We found that that 1-month treatment with a high budesonide dose remarkably reduced all asthma symptoms. Moreover, symptoms were under control in all treatment groups throughout the study period. Similarly, lung function improved and remained stable, and no relevant differences between groups were observed. In each treatment group, the majority of patients had no exacerbations. In patients treated with the standard budesonide dose (group 1), the number of exacerbations and days with exacerbations were significantly lower than in group 3 (intention-to-treat analysis). Additionally, patients treated with low budesonide dose plus budesonide (group 2) experienced a significantly lower number of exacerbations and days with exacerbations compared to group 3 (per-protocol analysis).
                This study demonstrates that when patients with moderate asthma had reached a stable clinical condition with a high dose of budesonide, a low dose of budesonide (200 microg/d) is as effective as the standard dose (800 microg/d) in the control of symptoms and lung function over a period of several months. Furthermore, results showed that the addition of inhaled budesonide (800 microg/d) at onset of an asthmatic exacerbation has a beneficial clinical effect. Thirty-nine subjects were included in this double-blind, placebo-controlled study of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in patients with mild to moderate asthma. The time-courses of change of FEV1, PEFR%, bronchial reactivity, and daily measures of asthma control were determined during 8 weeks of treatment after a run-in period of 2 weeks. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness was assessed by the methacholine provocation method, defined as the dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall of FEV1 compared with baseline values. The trends of FEV1 and the percentage change in PEFR from baseline were significantly different between groups, in favor of budesonide (P < .05). Patient assessments of the effect of treatment showed that PEF improved significantly in the budesonide group only. The budesonide group increased their tolerability for methacholine provocation by 1.8 DD (doubling dose), which tended to be higher compared with the 0.8 DD of the placebo group. It is evident from this study and previous studies that more data are needed to establish the dose-effect relationship with time and severity of the disease. The efficacy of budesonide (800 micrograms b.d.) and beclomethasone dipropionate (750 micrograms b.d.) in controlling the symptoms of asthma, pulmonary function, bronchial responsiveness to histamine, and adrenal function, was assessed in a double-blind, double-dummy cross-over study of 36 adult chronic asthmatic patients. The patients, the majority of whom were assessed to be affected to a severe degree, were insufficiently controlled in their current regimen of inhaled steroids and/or inhaled and oral bronchodilators. A 2 weeks baseline period preceded 6 weeks of treatment with each of the study drugs. Both treatment groups showed improvements from baseline in clinical assessment of lung function carried out after the first 6 weeks of treatment. No significant differences were seen throughout the entire 12 weeks study, when comparing the effects of the treatments on FEV1, FVC, PEF or the histamine PC20. Asthma severity, symptom score and inhaled bronchodilator use showed the same results after both treatments. It is concluded that inhalations of budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate in high doses are equally potent in the treatment of severe asthma. There is no significant influence on the adrenal function and no significant side effects during a period equal to that of the present study. The aim of the present study was to examine the efficacy of low-dose inhaled budesonide (BUD) administered via Turbuhaler once or twice daily on symptoms, lung function and bronchial hyperreactivity in children with mild asthma. One hundred and sixty-three children (mean age 9.9 yrs, 56 females/107 males) with mild asthma (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 103% of predicted, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 87% pred, reversibility in FEV1 3%, fall in FEV1 after exercise 10.4% from pre-exercise value) and not previously treated with inhaled steroids, were included in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. After a two-week run-in period, the children received inhaled BUD 100 microg or 200 microg once daily in the morning, 100 microg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Exercise and methacholine challenges were performed before and at the end of treatment. After 12 weeks of therapy, the fall in FEV1 after an exercise test was significantly less in all three BUD groups (43-5.1%) than in the placebo group (8.6%). Bronchial hyperreactivity to methacholine with the provocative dose causing a 20% fall in FEV1 decreased significantly in the BUD 100 microg twice-daily group compared with placebo (ratio at the end of treatment 156%). Changes in baseline lung function (FEV1 and PEF) were less marked than changes in bronchial responsiveness. In conclusion, low doses of inhaled budesonide, given once or twice daily, provided protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children with mild asthma and near normal lung function. The aim of this study was to assess whether nebulized budesonide may substitute for oral prednisolone in the management of children whose asthma is severe enough to warrant hospital admission, but who have no life threatening features. In a prospective, double-blind, randomized study nebulized budesonide (2 mg 8 hourly) was compared with oral prednisolone (2 mg/kg at entry and again at 24 h) in 46 children admitted to hospital with severe asthma exacerbations. Efficacy variables (including lung function measurements such as the primary outcome variable, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) and symptoms) were measured 24 h after treatment initiation. FEV1 improved significantly compared to baseline in patients who received nebulized budesonide compared to the prednislone group. The data show nebulized budesonide to be at least as effective as oral steroid in improving lung function and symptom severity in severe exacerbations of childhood asthma. The importance of early initiation of inhaled steroids even in mild asthma has been documented in several studies. It is not, however, clear whether the treatment should be started with a high or a low dose of the inhaled steroid. We have compared the effects of high and low dose inhaled steroid, budesonide, in patients with newly detected asthma. We studied 101 adult patients with newly detected bronchial asthma who were without inhaled steroid or any regular pharmacological treatment for their asthma. The patients were randomly allocated to two treatment groups: one to receive 800 microg inhaled budesonide per day and the other to receive 200 microg inhaled budesonide per day. The drugs were given with a Turbuhaler dry powder inhaler. During the 3-month treatment period, no significant differences between the treatment groups were noted in morning or evening PEF values, in spirometric parameters, in asthmatic symptoms or in the use of rescue beta2-agonists. The decrease in bronchial hyperresponsiveness was, however, more marked in the high dose budesonide group, reaching a borderline significance (P=0.10 high vs. low dose budesonide). In addition, in serum markers of asthmatic inflammation significant differences were shown between the treatment groups. The decrease in the number of blood eosinophils during the treatment was more marked in the high dose budesonide group (P=0.02; high vs. low dose budesonide). In serum ECP no change was observed in the low dose budesonide group, but a marked decrease in the high-dose budesonide group (P=0.008; high vs. low dose budesonide). The change was even more marked with regard to serum EPX (P=0.005; high vs. low dose budesonide). Our results support the view that the treatment of newly detected asthma should be started with a high dose of inhaled steroid. The low dose may not be enough to suppress asthmatic inflammation despite good clinical primary response. Adding inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists to a low dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) results in better asthma control than increasing the dose of ICSs. An important, but as yet unresolved, question is whether this is due to an additional reduction of airway inflammation.
                Double-blind, parallel-group trial.
                Forty asthma patients (FEV1, 50 to 90% predicted; provocative concentration of a substance [methacholine] causing a 20% fall in FEV1 of < 8 mg/mL; no ICSs in the last 4 weeks).
                Randomization to 8 weeks of treatment with 100 microg of budesonide bid plus placebo (BUD200) or 100 microg of budesonide bid plus 12 microg of formoterol (BUD200 + F). Then the dose of budesonide (BUD) was increased to 400 microg bid in both groups for another 8 weeks. Bronchial biopsy specimens were collected before, and after 8 and 16 weeks of treatment. Eosinophils (major basic protein [MBP]) and mast cells (tryptase) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry.
                BUD200 reduced the MBP staining (p = 0.008) and tryptase staining (p = 0.048) in the epithelium compared to baseline levels. There were no significant differences between the BUD200 and BUD200 + F groups. In both groups, increasing the dosage of BUD to 800 microg had no significant additional antiinflammatory effect.
                Our results demonstrate that BUD administered at a low dose has significant antiinflammatory effects in patients with mild asthma. No significant additional antiinflammatory effects could be demonstrated either by adding formoterol or by increasing the dose of BUD. Guidelines on the use of inhaled steroids in asthma advocate that the daily dose should be chosen according to the severity of the disease. However, the question of the optimal starting dose remains to be properly addressed, as does the issue of the adjustment in dose required for a given patient. Whether a high initial dose of budesonide (800 microg b.i.d) was more efficacious than a standard dose (200 microg b.i.d) in controlling mild-to-moderate asthma was investigated, and whether the dose could be decreased, based on peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom-score, beta2-agonist use in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group 18-week study. One-hundred and sixty-nine patients (mean age 38 yrs, mean forced expiratory volume in one second 74% predicted) were enrolled. No difference was detected between the two groups in improvement in morning PEF (+61 L x min(-1) in the high-dose group, +60 L x min(-1) in the standard-dose group by 16 weeks). Morning and evening PEF values stabilized before the end of the first 4 weeks. No difference between groups was observed in symptom score, beta2-agonist use, number of exacerbation per interval and the best forced expiratory volume in one second achieved. The proportion of subjects being able to decrease the doses of budesonide was similar in both treatment strategies. It is concluded that both high and standard initial doses are equally effective in controlling symptoms and improving lung function in mild-to-moderate asthma. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose budesonide/formoterol, 80 micro g/4.5 micro g, bid in a single inhaler (Symbicort Turbuhaler; AstraZeneca; Lund, Sweden) compared with an increased dose of budesonide, 200 micro g bid, in adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma not fully controlled on low doses of inhaled corticosteroid alone.
                All patients received budesonide, 100 micro g bid, during a 2-week run-in period. At the end of the run-in phase, 467 patients with a mean FEV(1) of 82% predicted received 12 weeks of treatment with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler or budesonide alone in a higher dose. Patients kept daily records of their morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), nighttime and daytime symptom scores, and use of reliever medication.
                The increase in mean morning PEF-the primary efficacy measure-was significantly higher for budesonide/formoterol compared with budesonide alone (16.5 L/min vs 7.3 L/min, p = 0.002). Similarly, evening PEF was significantly greater in the budesonide/formoterol group (p < 0.001). In addition, the percentage of symptom-free days and asthma-control days (p = 0.007 and p = 0.002, respectively) were significantly improved in the budesonide/formoterol group. Budesonide/formoterol decreased the relative risk of an asthma exacerbation by 26% (p = 0.02) compared with budesonide alone. Adverse events were comparable between the two treatment groups.
                This study shows that in adult patients whose mild-to-moderate asthma is not fully controlled on low doses of inhaled corticosteroids, single-inhaler therapy with budesonide and formoterol provides greater improvements in asthma control than increasing the maintenance dose of inhaled corticosteroid. The rebound increase in bronchial reactivity and fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) following treatment with beta agonists seen in several studies has occurred regardless of concurrent steroid therapy. Little is known about the effect of adding beta agonists to corticosteroids, but in a recent study regular treatment with terbutaline appeared to reduce some of the beneficial effects of budesonide. The effects of budesonide alone and in combination with regular terbutaline treatment on lung function, symptom scores, and bronchial reactivity were therefore examined.
                Sixteen subjects with mild stable asthma inhaled budesonide 800 micrograms twice daily for two periods of 14 days with terbutaline 1000 micrograms three times daily or placebo in a double blind crossover fashion. FEV1 and the dose of histamine or adenosine monophosphate (AMP) causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20) were measured before and 12 hours after the final dose of treatment, and changes from baseline were compared. Seven day mean values for daily morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) values, symptom scores, and rescue medication were compared before and during treatment.
                Morning and evening PEF rose more with budesonide plus terbutaline than with budesonide alone, with a mean difference of 19 l/min occurring in the evening (95% confidence interval (CI) 2 to 36). There was no difference in symptom scores during treatment. Following treatment the mean increase in FEV1 was 150 ml higher with budesonide alone (95% CI-10 to 300). There was no difference between treatments in change in histamine and AMP PD20.
                Evening PEF was greater when budesonide was combined with regular terbutaline. There was no evidence of a difference in bronchial reactivity following the two treatment regimens. The findings of a previous study were not confirmed as the reduction in FEV1 after budesonide and terbutaline was smaller and not statistically significant. Further work is needed to determine whether this disparity in findings in the two studies is due to a type 2 statistical error in this study or a spurious finding in the previous study. The effect of the inhaled topical steroid budesonide on adrenal function was evaluated in 33 children (aged 7-15 years) with moderate bronchial asthma. The trial was designed as a prospective single-blind study of the effect of budesonide in daily doses of 200 microgram through 400 microgram to 800 micrograms in three randomized consecutive periods of 8 weeks. The unstimulated diurnal production of cortisol was assessed by measurement of free cortisol in 24-hour urine samples at the end of each period. No significant dose-related suppression was found. The cortisol production did not differ significantly during treatment with 800 microgram budesonide as compared to treatment with 200 microgram budesonide (95% confidence interval: 74%-112%). It is concluded, that budesonide is a topical steroid with a favourable ratio between topical and systemic effects in asthmatic children. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of low-dose inhaled budesonide (once or twice daily) and placebo, administered via Turbuhaler, on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children with mild asthma. Fifty-seven steroid-naive children (7-16 years old; 41 boys, 16 girls) with EIB participated in this sub-population study according to the following inclusion criterion: a maximum fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) > or = 10% after a standardized treadmill test. Mean baseline FEV1 was 100.3% of predicted, and mean maximum fall in FEV1 after the standardized exercise test was 22%. The study was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group design. After 2 weeks of run-in, the children received inhaled budesonide 100 microg or 200 microg once daily in the morning, 100 microg twice daily, or placebo, for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks of treatment, the fall in FEV1 after the exercise test was significantly less in all three budesonide groups (7.2-7.8%) vs. placebo (16.7%). Daytime symptom scores were significantly lower in all three budesonide groups compared with placebo (p <0.02). The three budesonide groups did not differ significantly, and no significant change in lung function was found in any group. Therefore children with mild asthma, but with significant EIB, improved their exercise tolerance and symptom control after 3 months of treatment with a low dose of inhaled budesonide given once or twice daily. A double blind, parallel group study was carried out to investigate the effect of inhaled budesonide in a moderate (200 micrograms) and a low (100 micrograms) twice daily dosage compared with the effect of placebo in 103 adults with mild symptomatic asthma. Subjects recorded peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and beta 2 agonist consumption at home for a period of seven weeks (a one week run in and six weeks' treatment). Morning baseline PEF (around 80% of predicted normal) increased non-significantly to 88% with 200 micrograms budesonide daily and to 90% (p less than 0.05) with 400 micrograms, compared with 81% with placebo. Evening PEF (around 94% of predicted normal) did not change significantly with active or placebo treatment. By comparison with placebo, there was a significant decrease in nocturnal asthma symptoms and beta 2 agonist consumption. The changes during the day were less pronounced and significant only for 400 micrograms budesonide daily. No significant differences between the two active treatments were detected. It is concluded that low doses of inhaled budesonide are effective in patients with mild symptomatic asthma, particularly for night time symptoms and early morning lung function. The early introduction of inhaled corticosteroids for patients with mild asthma and night time symptoms may improve their quality of life during the night and early morning. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the dose-response relationships of the inhaled corticosteroid budesonide in a double blind crossover study in 19 children with moderate and severe asthma.
                A 2-week placebo treatment period (run-in) was followed by three 4-week treatment periods during which 100, 200, and 400 micrograms of budesonide were given per day in randomized order. Urinary cortisol excretion, lung functions, and protection against exercise-induced asthma were assessed at the end of run-in and each treatment period. Furthermore, morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates, day and night symptoms, and use of rescue beta 2-agonists were recorded throughout the study.
                One hundred micrograms of budesonide per day markedly improved symptoms, morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates, and use of rescue beta 2-agonists (p < 0.01). No further improvement was seen in these parameters with increasing doses of budesonide. In contrast, a significant dose-response effect was found on lung functions measured at the hospital and fall in lung functions after exercise (p < 0.001); 200 micrograms was significantly better than 100 micrograms, and 400 micrograms was significantly better than 200 micrograms. About 53% of the maximum effect against exercise-induced asthma was achieved by the lowest budesonide dose (p < 0.001), and about 83% by the highest dose. No significant differences were seen in urinary cortisol excretion between run-in and the various budesonide doses.
                Low doses of budesonide, which are not associated with any systemic side effects, have a marked antiasthma effect in children. Protection against exercise-induced asthma requires higher doses than achievement of symptom control. The addition of the long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist formoterol to low- to moderate-dose budesonide has shown clinical efficacy in patients with persistent asthma. Combination therapy with budesonide/formoterol in 1 pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) has been found to have greater efficacy than its monocomponents in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma, but it has not been assessed in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma.
                The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of budesonide and formoterol delivered via 1 pMDI (budesonide/formoterol pMDI), budesonide pMDI, formoterol dry powder inhaler (DPI), and placebo.
                This 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-dummy study was conducted at 56 centers across the United States. Patients aged > or =12 years with mild to moderate persistent asthma treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) for > or =4 weeks before screening and who had a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) of > or =60% to < or =90% of predicted normal at screening were eligible. After 2 weeks (current asthma therapy discontinued), patients received twice-daily budesonide/formoterol pMDI 80/4.5 microg x 2 inhalations (160/9 microg), budesonide pMDI 80 microg x 2 inhalations (160 microg), formoterol DPI 4.5 microg x 2 inhalations (9 microg), or placebo. The coprimary efficacy variables were changes from baseline in morning predose FEV(1) and 12-hour mean FEV(1) (from serial spirometry) after administration of the morning dose of study medication. Tolerability was assessed based on adverse events (AEs); routine laboratory assessments; electrocardiography; 24-hour Holter monitor assessments; and physical examinations, including vital signs (eg, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate). AEs were recorded manually by the patient in paper notebooks and reviewed at each clinic visit by the investigator and during a final follow-up phone call.
                A total of 480 patients were randomized (299 females, 181 males; mean age, 36 years; mean FEV(1), 2.4 L; budesonide/formoterol pMDI, 123 patients; budesonide pMDI, 121; formoterol DPI, 114; placebo, 122). At end of treatment, the mean increases from baseline in predose FEV(1) were greater with budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus budesonide pMDI, formoterol DPI, and placebo (0.37 vs 0.23, 0.17, and 0.03 L, respectively; all, P<0.005). 0.005). After administration of the first dose and at weeks 2 and 12, mean increases in 12-hour mean FEV(1) were significantly greater with budesonide/formoterol pMDI (0.41, 0.47, and 0.50 L, respectively) versus budesonide pMDI (0.17, 0.30, and 0.32 L) and placebo (0.15, 0.12, and 0.12 L) (all, P < 0.001). Fewer patients receiving budesonide/formoterol pMDI met criteria for (18.7%; P < 0.001) or withdrew because of (7.3%; P < or = 0.010) worsening asthma versus formoterol DPI (42.1% and 18.4%, respectively) and placebo (56.6% and 32.8%); results were similar between budesonide pMDI (21.5% and 6.6%, respectively) and budesonide/formoterol pMDI. Three patients experienced serious AEs; none was considered related to study medication. The proportions of withdrawals due to worsening asthma were not significantly different between the budesonide/formoterol pMDI and budesonide pMDI groups.
                In this population of adults and adolescents with mild to moderate persistent asthma previously treated with ICSs, twice-daily budesonide/formoterol pMDI was associated with significantly increased pulmonary function versus its monocomponents. All study drugs were generally well tolerated. Inhaled corticosteroids are established first-line anti-inflammatory treatment for asthma. Clinical trials comparing inhaled corticosteroids must take into consideration that because of their excellent effect at low doses, they typically induce a near-maximal response in asthma patients.
                The aim of the present dose-response study was to estimate the minimal effective doses (MEDs) of budesonide and of fluticasone propionate via dry-powder inhaler in adults with mild to moderate asthma.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter, dose-reduction trial performed in adults to compare these 2 inhaled corticosteroids. After a 4- to 6-week run-in period with beclomethasone dipropionate 2000 pg/d, patients fulfilling defined criteria for asthma control were randomly allocated to treatment with budesonide or fluticasone, both administered BID at a total of 800 pg/d. At 5-week intervals, the dose was reduced to 400 and then 200 pg/d (200 and 100 pg BID) if asthma control was maintained according to further defined criteria. The MED was defined as the last dose level before deterioration of asthma control.
                Subjects were 197 asthmatic patients with a mean age of 40.6 years in the budesonide group and 41.5 years in the fluticasone group. In both groups, baseline mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) was 79.4% of the predicted normal volume and baseline mean FEV(1) reversibility was 22.3%. The median MED for both groups was 400 microg/d, with no detectable difference in dis-tributions. The budesonide-to-fluticasone ratio for the geometric mean MED was 123% (95% CI, 99-153 [not significant]). No statistically significant differences regarding lung function, symptom scores, or rescue medication usage were found between the treatment groups during the first treatment period. Adverse-event profiles were similar in both groups, and no unexpected adverse events were considered to be caused by the study drugs.
                This effect-controlled study did not detect a statistically significant difference between the MEDs for budesonide and fluticasone via dry-powder inhaler in adults with mild to moderate asthma. To determine the efficacy and safety of budesonide delivered by an inhalation-driven dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler) in children with moderate to severe persistent asthma.
                In our randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study, a total of 404 children with asthma, who were aged 6 to 18 years and who had been receiving inhaled glucocorticosteroid therapy, were randomly assigned to receive either 100, 200, or 400 micrograms of budesonide or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. At baseline, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 74.6% (range, 30.7% to 123.3%) of the predicted normal value.
                Patients in each of the three budesonide treatment groups showed significant dose-related improvements in lung function (morning peak expiratory flow and FEV1), in asthma symptoms, and with a significant decrease in inhaled beta 2-agonist use in comparison with placebo. Improvements were evident within 2 weeks and were maintained throughout the 12 weeks. Budesonide treatment had no significant effect on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function, and the incidence of reported adverse events was similar in all treatment groups.
                Budesonide administered via a dry powder inhaler provided dose-related improvements in lung function and clinical status and was well tolerated by children (6 to 18 years of age) with moderate to severe persistent asthma. We determined the relative antiasthmatic and systemic glucocorticoid potencies of inhaled budesonide (BUD) versus morning-dose oral prednisone (PRED) in 34 adult patients with asthma over a dose range extending from conventional to high and potentially toxic levels, 3.2 mg of BUD or 40 mg of PRED per day. Changes in symptom frequency and severity, FEV1, and peak expiratory flow rate were measured during a double-blind, double-dummy controlled, crossover protocol. The drugs proved equally effective, provided a sufficient dosage was administered. The dose required to eliminate recurrently disabling asthma relapses in these patients was about 2.0 mg of BUD per day or greater than 40 mg of PRED per day. On the average, BUD doses greater than or equal to 1.84 mg/day/70 kg adult (26.3 micrograms/kg/day) exhibited systemic effects on the 8 AM serum cortisol level and blood eosinophil count equivalent to greater than or equal to 15 mg of PRED per day. The latter doses are known to be associated with steroid-induced complications, such as osteoporosis. However, the level of systemic glucocorticoid activity produced by any particular dose of BUD in these patients was consistently much lower than that produced by the dose of PRED needed to achieve an equivalent level of antiasthmatic response. Thus, the use of high-dose inhaled BUD appears clinically reasonable and ethically acceptable in patients with severe asthma in whom the alternative is their continuing dependency on PRED.
Budesonide exhibits a significant dose response effect between low and high dose for improvement in FEV1 in severe asthma and reduction of exacerbations in moderate to severe asthma. No significant dose dependent improvements in FEV1, PEFR or symptoms are evident in non-oral steroid treated asthmatics with mild to moderate disease. Dose dependent alterations in sensitive measures of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function were evident but the clinical significance of these changes is unclear.