Lack of efficacy of hydergine in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Double-blind clinical and psychologic study of ergoloid mesylates (Hydergine) in subjects with senile mental deterioration. Pharmacotherapy for organic brain syndrome in late life. Evaluation of an ergot derivative vs placebo. Ergoloid mesylates ('Hydergine') in the treatment of mental deterioration in the elderly: a 6-month double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Randomized controlled pilot trial of cabergoline, hydergine and levodopa/carbidopa: Los Angeles Cocaine Rapid Efficacy Screening Trial (CREST). Memantine in the treatment of mild to moderate dementia syndrome. A double-blind placebo-controlled study. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of rivastigmine capsules in patients with probable vascular dementia: the VantagE study. Clinical efficacy of Ginkgo biloba special extract EGb 761 in dementia of the Alzheimer type.
There is no effective pharmacologic treatment for Alzheimer's disease, the most common dementing illness in the United States. Hydergine, a combination of ergoloid mesylates, is the only approved medication for Alzheimer's disease, but despite widespread use its efficacy remains to be established. We conducted a clinical trial of Hydergine-LC, a newer preparation of ergoloid mesylates in the form of a liquid in a capsule (LC) that may have greater bioavailability, to determine its value in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
                Eighty older adults with probable Alzheimer's disease participated in this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Hydergine-LC for 24 weeks. The recommended dose of 1 mg orally three times daily was used. Cognition and behavior were evaluated before and after the trial, and the patients were monitored for adverse effects. The medication was safe and well tolerated. The Hydergine-LC group did not perform better after treatment than the placebo group on any test, and its performance was worse (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.02, respectively) on one cognitive measure (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Digit Symbol Substitution Task) and on one behavioral scale (the Geriatric Evaluation by Relatives Rating Instrument).
                Hydergine-LC appears to be ineffective as a treatment for Alzheimer's disease. A double-blind study of 24 weeks' duration was conducted to investigate the effects of ergoloid mesylates (Hydergine) on symptoms of senile mental deterioration. Fifty-eight residents of old people's homes were included in the trial. Thirty were treated with ergoloid mesylates and 28 with placebo, and the effects of treatment were determined by means of medical and psychological examinations. On the Sandoz Clinical Assessment Geriatric Scale, the group receiving ergoloid mesylates showed significant improvement in all items. The group receiving placebo showed slight deterioration. Psychological examination showed that no changes were observed for either group in quantitative psychometric test results, although qualitative aspects of performance such as attention and concentration did improve. There was a close correlation between improved cognitive function scores on the SCAG and improved evaluations of behavior during the psychological examinations. There were marked individual differences in the degrees of improvement. Evaluation of treatment modalities, including pharmacotherapy, for organic brain syndrome (OBS) has been difficult because of sampling and methodological problems, and comparisons of research studies are all but impossible. In this study, an ergot derivative, a combination of dihydroergocornine mesylate, dihydroergocristine mesylate, and dihydroergokryptine mesylate (Hydergine) was compared with placebo, using a double-blind technique in a sample of nursing home residents with evidence of OBS. An 18-category symptom rating scale was used for periodic assessment over a six-month interval. Comparisons of the two groups of subjects disclosed that the Hydergine-treated group showed statistically significantly more improvement in most of the variables measured, especially during the last three months of treatment. Furthermore, sophisticated analysis revealed that positive changes in cognitive function cannot be accounted for as a mere reflection, or "halo" effect, associated with improved mood and general sense of well-being. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was carried out in 97 elderly patients with age-related mental deterioration to assess the efficacy of ergoloid mesylates in improving their symptoms. Patients were allocated at random to receive either 4.5 mg ergoloid mesylates per day or a matching placebo tablet and were followed-up for 6 months after the start of treatment. Clinical examinations were performed by the doctor, using the EACG rating scale (a French version of the Sandoz Clinical Assessment Geriatric scale), and by the nurse, using the NOSIE scale, when patients entered the trial and repeated after 2, 4 and 6 months. Changes in the factors (symptom groups) covered by these scales were subjected to statistical analysis. After 6-months' treatment, a statistically significant difference in favour of the ergoloid mesylates group was observed for cognitive deficits (p less than 0.05), anxiety and mood depression (p less than 0.01), unsociability (p less than 0.01), retardation (p less than 0.05) and irritability (p less than 0.001). Treatment was very well tolerated. It was also observed that there was a progressive increase in efficacy throughout the trial; this indicates that treatment with ergoloid mesylates in patients with mental deterioration should be long-term. This study tested three dopaminergic medications against a common unmatched placebo condition: hydergine 1 mg three times daily (n = 15); levodopa/carbidopa 25/100 mg three times daily (n = 15); cabergoline 0.5 mg per week (n = 15); and placebo three times daily (n = 15) as potential pharmacotherapies for cocaine dependence.
                The four-parallel group, Cocaine Rapid Efficacy Screening Trial (CREST) design featured a 2-week baseline period followed by randomization to an 8-week medication condition that included 1 hour per week of cognitive behavioral drug counseling. A safety evaluation was conducted 4 weeks after termination.
                Outcomes included cocaine metabolites measured in urine, retention and self-reports for drug use, cocaine craving, clinical improvement, mood and HIV risk behaviors.
                Participants assigned to receive cabergoline provided more urine samples negative for cocaine metabolites (42.4%) than those assigned to receive placebo (25.0%), a statistically significant difference after controlling for baseline differences in self-reported cocaine use (F = 2.95, df = 3; P = 0.05). Cabergoline-treated participants demonstrated a significant improvement over placebo from baseline to week 8 when measured using the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) employment subscale (overall change = - 0.09, SD = 0.10, t = 2.36, P < 0.05). Safety and adverse event measures showed similar rates and types of complaints by treatment condition.
                These results, combined with the apparent safety of cabergoline when used with this population, provide empirical support for conducting a larger study of the medication. The efficacy and the tolerability of memantine (1-amino-3,5-dimethyladamantane hydrochloride, Akatinol Memantine, CAS 41100-52-1) were investigated in patients with mild to moderate dementia syndrome in a randomized two-centre placebo-controlled clinical study. The test substance was administered at a dose of 10 mg/d from day 1 to day 3 and then at a dose of 2 x 10 mg/d from day 4 to the end of treatment after 42 days. Altogether, 88 patients were recruited to the study; their average age was 71.5 years. The efficacy of memantine was judged on the basis of the baseline/6 week differences in the total sum scores of the Clinical Assessment Geriatric Scale (SCAG), the Gottfries-Bräne-Steen Scale (GBS), the SCAG and GBS subscales and the global assessment of the change in the patient's condition. The effects of memantine on performance were studied with the aid of psychomotor tests and a behaviour investigation relating to activities of daily living (ADL). The tolerability of memantine was assessed on the basis of the doctor's global assessment and of entries on structured documentation forms (DOTES/TWIS). Further safety parameters--in the form of clinicochemical tests and measurements of blood pressure and heart rate--were also monitored during the study. On both the psychopathological measurement level (SCAG, global assessment of the change in the patient's condition) and the behavioural level (GBS), confirmatory statistical analysis brought to light significant differences between memantine and placebo (p less than or equal to 0.05), these differences showing a superiority of memantine. The tolerability of memantine was good in the main. The observed adverse reactions were not serious and, except in 3 patients, were rated as causing little or no impairment. The present clinical study demonstrates the efficacy of memantine in patients suffering from mostly moderate dementia syndrome. Clinical and statistically relevant improvements in the dementia-induced disturbances were found on the both the psychopathological level (SCAG, CGI) and the behavioural level (GBS). On the performance level also, the ADL behaviour investigation detected a highly significant improvement in the quality of performance of instrumented activities of daily living under memantine. Also the time taken to carry out these tasks was significantly reduced in comparison with placebo. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of rivastigmine capsules in patients diagnosed with probable vascular dementia (VaD).
                VantagE (Vascular Dementia trial studying Exelon) was a 24-week, multicentre, double-blind study. VaD patients aged 50-85 years were randomized to rivastigmine capsules (3-12 mg/day) or placebo. Efficacy assessments included global and cognitive performances, activities of daily living and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Adverse events were recorded. Additional exploratory analyses determined whether heterogeneity in pathologies and symptoms extended to differential treatment effects.
                NCT00099216.
                710 patients were randomized. Rivastigmine demonstrated superiority over placebo on three measures of cognitive performance (Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale, Mini-Mental State Examination; all p< or = 0.05, intent-to-treat population [ITT]), but not other outcomes. Predominant adverse events were nausea and vomiting. Exploratory analyses indicated that older patients (> or =75 years old), assumed more likely to also have Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology, demonstrated significant cognitive responses to rivastigmine and a safety profile similar to that seen in AD patients. Younger patients, assumed less likely to have concomitant AD pathology, showed no efficacy response and were associated with slight elevations of blood pressure, cerebrovascular accidents and mortality. Rivastigmine-placebo differences in patients with, versus those without, medial temporal atrophy (also suggestive of concomitant AD) showed a numerical difference similar to that seen between the older versus younger patients, but did not attain statistical significance.
                Consistent with trials evaluating other cholinesterase inhibitors, rivastigmine did not provide consistent efficacy in probable VaD. The efficacy apparent on cognitive outcomes was derived from effects in older patients likely to have concomitant Alzheimer pathology. This is supportive of an existing argument that the putative cholinergic deficit in VaD reflects the presence of concomitant Alzheimer pathology. Among the psychiatric illnesses associated with old age primary degenerative dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) has gained increasing importance in recent years. Even though a curative treatment of the disease is currently impossible, various drugs can be used to slow down its progression. In the present study the influence of oral treatment with 240 mg/day of Ginkgo bilabo special extract EGb 761 (Tebonin forte, manufactured by Dr Willmar Schwabe, Karlsruhe) on the clinical course of DAT was investigated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled parallel-group design in 20 outpatients. The duration of treatment was 3 months. The primary outcome variable was the sum score in the SKT-test for the determination of attention and memory. Other psychometric tests (trailmaking test, ADAS, CGI) and electrophysiological investigations (EEG topography) were evaluated descriptively. Although the active-treatment group, with a mean sum score of 19.67 points in the, S.K.T., had a poorer baseline level than the placebo group (18.11 points), it experienced an improvement to 16.78 points under treatment with EGb 761 whereas the placebo group deteriorated to 18.89 points. The differences between the baseline and final values formed the basis for a statistical group comparison, which gave a result favourable to EGb 761, at a significance level of p < .013. In addition to this psychometric confirmation of efficacy, certain descriptive trends were found at the psychopathological (Clinical Global Impression) and dynamic functional (EEG findings) levels, which can be interpreted as evidence of effectiveness of Ginkgo biloba special extract EGb 761 in mild to moderate dementia and of local effects in the central nervous system. Inter-group differences in the ADAS cognitive and non-cognitive subscales did not reach statistical significance, probably because of the small sample size.
As in an earlier systematic review, we found hydergine to show significant treatment effects when assessed by either global ratings or comprehensive rating scales (based here on a smaller set of trials than in the earlier published systematic review because trials were required to have data that could conform with MetaView, the Cochrane Collaboration statistics software). The small number of trials available for analysis, however, limited the ability of subgroup analyses to identify statistically significant moderating effects.
Unfortunately, most of the randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trials of hydergine were conducted and published before the advent of consensus-based diagnostic standards of dementia in 1984; therefore diagnostic criteria were less specific. As a result, uncertainty remains regarding hydergine's efficacy in dementia.