Short incubation PDT versus 5-FU in treating actinic keratoses. A clinical comparison and long-term follow-up of topical 5-fluorouracil versus laser resurfacing in the treatment of widespread actinic keratoses. Treatment of men with flat (FC) or acuminata (CA) condylomata with interferon alpha-2a. [A double-blind randomized comparative study of oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cyclophosphamide (CPA), and 5-FU + CPA in advanced breast cancer]. Comparison of 5% 5-fluorouracil cream and 5% imiquimod cream in the management of actinic keratoses on the face and scalp.
The efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) using broad area treatment with 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) has not been compared to topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of actinic keratoses (AK). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of PDT using short incubation time, broad area treatment with ALA plus activation with either blue light or laser light to topical 5-FU in the treatment of AK of the face and scalp. Thirty-six subjects with AK of either the face or scalp were randomized to receive either application of ALA for 1 hour followed by activation with blue light or pulsed dye laser or topical 5-FU. Efficacy was evaluated by grading AK lesions and photoaging signs. Tolerability was assessed by scoring crusting/erosions, erythema and stinging/burning. Treatment with PDT using ALA plus blue light was as effective as topical 5-FU in clearing AK. PDT using ALA plus laser light was the least effective treatment. All treatments made improvements in the signs of photoaging. Both PDT treatments were better tolerated than 5-FU. In conclusion, broad area PDT treatment with ALA plus activation with blue light appears to be as effective as 5-FU in the treatment of AK. ALA plus laser light is somewhat less effective than the above therapies. Efficacy could likely be improved with further study of laser parameters and incubation times. Many treatment modalities exist for actinic keratoses (AK). Topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been one of the standard treatments. Laser resurfacing is a more recent treatment option. In the literature prospective randomized studies comparing these treatments are lacking.
                Prospective randomized study to compare topical 5-FU with Er:YAG laser resurfacing. Fifty-five patients with multiple AK on the scalp and or the face were included. Clinical and histopathological evaluation took place at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment.
                At 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment, there were significantly less recurrences in the laser group compared to the group of patients treated with 5-FU. Side effects did occur more frequently in the laser group, especially erythema and hypopigmentation.
                Compared to treatment with topical 5-FU, Er:YAG laser resurfacing is more effective regarding recurrence rates. Although significantly more side effects occur, laser resurfacing is a useful therapeutic option especially in patients with widespread AK.
                (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. This study was undertaken to assess the effect of CO2 laser vaporization, 5-fluorouracil 5% (5-FU) topical application and Interferon alpha-2a (IFA alpha-2a) in the treatment of C.A. or F.C. of the male genital tract. From March 1986 to September 1991, 1372 men, sexual partners of women with F.C. or C.A. or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, were submitted to peoscopy. One thousand and nineteen (74.27%) men presented with various penile lesions caused by HPV (histologically confirmed); of these 505 were treated for C.A. or F.C. or a combination of F.C. and C.A. The best treatment modalities, irrespective of the kind of lesion, were found to be the combination of 5-FU plus IFN alpha-2a (high dose) (98.27%), the combination of CO2 laser vaporization plus 5-FU plus IFN alpha-2a (high dose) (93.93%) and the combination of CO2 laser vaporization plus 5-FU (87.23%). In conclusion we believe that IFN alpha-2a can be used with excellent results as first line treatment in combination with CO2 laser vaporization or/plus 5-FU in patients with C.A. or F.C. or combined condylomata. A randomized trial was performed comparing the effects of oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 300 mg/day, cyclophosphamide (CPA), 150 mg/day and 5-FU + CPA in advanced breast cancer. Some 181 patients were entered in the trial, with 1 ineligible, and 14 incomplete cases. Then 166 were evaluated for their rates of response in the treatment groups: 14.0% (8/57) in 5-FU, 23.6% (13/55) in CPA, and 37.0% (20/54) in 5-FU + CPA, with a P value of 0.019. The difference in response rates between 5-FU and 5-FU + CPA was shown to be significant (p = 0.005). When long NC was included in the comparison, there was a significant difference (p = 0.006) between the groups. A higher incidence of adverse effects was noted in the combination group. A significant difference was noted in TTP (time to progression) among the 3 groups (p = 0.0144), and between 5-FU and 5-FU + CPA (p = 0.0061). There were no significant differences in the overall survival among the groups (p = 0.6808). In conclusion, the combination oral treatment of 5-FU and CPA appears effective as a first line therapy for advanced breast cancer, and also in the postoperative adjuvant setting. It is timely to compare the efficacy and tolerability of 2 actinic keratosis (AK) therapies--5% 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) cream and imiquimod cream. Thirty-six patients with 4 or more AKs were randomly assigned to receive 5% 5-FU cream twice daily for 2 to 4 weeks or 5% imiquimod cream twice weekly for 16 weeks. Five percent 5-FU was more effective than imiquimod in exposing what were presumed to be subclinical AKs, reducing the final AK count (total AK count declined during the 24-week study by 94% vs. 66%, P < .05), achieving complete clearance (incidence of 84% vs. 24% by week 24, P < .01), and achieving clearance rapidly. Tolerability was similar except for erythema, which was initially significantly higher with 5-FU than imiquimod but resolved rapidly and was significantly lower than imiquimod by week 16. Five percent 5-FU remains the gold standard field therapy for AKs.
The reviewed trials were highly variable in methods and quality, and the evidence provided by these studies was weak. Cure rates with several treatments were variable, and although 5-FU presents therapeutic results that are inferior to those seen with 5-FU + Inf α-2a (high dose) and 5-FU + CO2 Laser + Inf α-2a (high dose), the treatment should not be abandoned. Topical treatment with 5-FU has a therapeutic effect; however, the benefits and risks have not been determined clearly and further studies are needed.