Early versus delayed surfactant administration in extremely premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome ventilated by high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Comparative efficacy of exosurf and survanta surfactants on early clinical course of respiratory distress syndrome and complications of prematurity. Use of surfactant for prophylaxis versus rescue treatment of respiratory distress syndrome: experience from an Italian-Bulgarian trial. Early surfactant for neonates with mild to moderate respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter, randomized trial.
To determine whether early surfactant administration is superior to selective delayed treatment in terms of improving survival and/or reducing chronic lung disease in extremely premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) treated by high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV).
                Prospective randomized clinical trial.
                Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in the Perinatology Center of Prague.
                Forty-three extremely premature infants who needed artificial ventilation within 3 h after delivery.
                Patients were randomly assigned to either early ( n=21) or delayed (n=22) administration of surfactant. All were ventilated by HFOV as the primary mode of ventilation using the high volume strategy aimed at optimizing lung volume. Curosurf at a dose of 100 mg/kg was given as a single bolus via the endotracheal tube within 1 min immediately after intubation in the early group (EARL), or during HFOV only when defined criteria were reached in the delayed (DEL) group.
                No differences were noted in demographic data between the two groups. Fewer infants randomized to the EARL group required oxygen use or died at 36 weeks (combined outcome 29% vs 64%, p=0.021), and there was a lower incidence of any intraventricular hemorrhage in this group (43 vs 82%, p=0.008).
                When compared to delayed dosing, early administration of surfactant followed by HFOV facilitates and accelerates respiratory stabilization during the acute phase of severe RDS, may reduce the incidence of chronic lung disease or death and may positively influence the incidence of severe intracranial pathology in extremely premature infants with primary surfactant insufficiency. To determine the comparative efficacy of Exosurf Neonatal and Survanta surfactants on the early course of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), arterial blood gases, ventilatory support, outcome morbidity rate, and complications of prematurity and RDS.
                Medical records from 203 premature newborn infants undergoing mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome, and who received up to four rescue doses of either Exosurf or Survanta, were retrospectively reviewed.
                All groups were comparable for birth weight and gestational age. Although the two randomized groups were similar in severity of RDS based on fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) and ventilatory support, a significantly greater improvement in respiratory function as evidenced by FIO2, mean airway pressure, alveolar-arterial partial pressure of oxygen difference, and oxygen index, was observed in the Survanta group from 12 hours (p < 0.05) through 48 hours (p < 0.01). Comparison of outcome morbidity rate by gestational age showed a higher occurrence of retinopathy of prematurity (p < 0.02) among the older infants (28 to 32 weeks) who were treated with Exosurf.
                Survanta exerted a significantly faster response in the early clinical course of RDS compared with Exosurf. However, no difference in the impact on eventual respiratory outcome was observed. We therefore conclude that both surfactants are effective for the treatment of RDS. To show if surfactant applied in different social-sanitary realities as prophylaxis of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is equally useful and able to reduce mortality and incidence of 3-4 radiological grade RDS.
                Two neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Italy, one NICU in Bulgaria and one NICU in Romania were involved in a randomized controlled clinical trial of prophylaxis vs rescue treatment of RDS. Babies with gestational age 26-30 wks were randomized before birth to prophylaxis in the delivery-room with 200 mg/kg of porcine surfactant (prophylaxis) or to routine assistance (control). Subsequently the babies developing RDS requiring mechanical ventilation and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) > or = 0.4 to maintain PaO2 about 50 mmHg were allowed to be treated rescue with 200 mg/kg of the same surfactant. To reach end-points of reducing mortality by 40% and incidence of radiological grade 3-4 RDS a total number of 174 patients were required.
                Due to logistic, practical and social-political problems the study was interrupted after enrollment of 93 babies (61 in Italy and 32 in Bulgaria). The Romanian centre did not start the study because it was impossible in the scheduled times to equip it for mechanical ventilation of the newborn infants. Analysis done on an intention to treat basis did not show significant reductions of mortality and 3-4 radiological grade RDS, even if there was a trend towards a reduction in the babies given prophylaxis. A significantly lower number of babies given prophylaxis required a subsequent rescue treatment compared to controls (p < 0.001). There was no difference in other complications such as intraventricular haemorrhage, air-leak syndromes and infections between prophylaxis and control infants. As regards pulmonary gas exchange, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio was significantly improved in the babies given prophylaxis for the first 12 hours of life vs the controls.
                Even if the study was terminated before term, the analysis of the data shows that prophylaxis with surfactant is equally effective in different social-clinical conditions to improve pulmonary gas-exchange, especially in the first critical hours of life of premature babies. We studied the efficacy and safety of electively providing surfactant to preterm infants with mild to moderate respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) not requiring mechanical ventilation.
                A 5-center, randomized clinical trial was performed on 132 infants with RDS, birth weight >or=1250 grams, gestational age <or=36 weeks, postnatal age 4 to 24 hours, Fio(2) >or=40% for >or=1 hour, and no immediate need for intubation. Infants were randomly assigned to intubation, surfactant (Survanta, Ross Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio) administration, and expedited extubation (n=65) or expectant management (n=67) with subsequent intubation and surfactant treatment as clinically indicated. The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation.
                Infants in the surfactant group had a median duration of mechanical ventilation of 2.2 hours compared with 0.0 hours for control infants, since only 29 of 67 control infants required mechanical ventilation (P=.001). Surfactant-treated infants were less likely to require subsequent mechanical ventilation for worsening respiratory disease (26% vs 43%, relative risk=0.60; 95% CI, 0.37, 0.99). There were no differences in secondary outcomes (duration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure, oxygen therapy, hospital stay, or adverse outcomes).
                Routine elective intubation for administration of surfactant to preterm infants >or=1250 grams with mild to moderate RDS is not recommended.
Early selective surfactant administration given to infants with RDS requiring assisted ventilation leads to a decreased risk of acute pulmonary injury (decreased risk of pneumothorax and pulmonary interstitial emphysema) and a decreased risk of neonatal mortality and chronic lung disease compared to delaying treatment of such infants until they develop worsening RDS.