Post-intercourse versus daily ciprofloxacin prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract infections in premenopausal women. Optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in older women: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Prophylactic ciprofloxacin for catheter-associated urinary-tract infection. Comparative study of single-dose and three-day therapy for acute uncomplicated cystitis. Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate: a randomized controlled study. Effectiveness of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis in preventing bacteriuria caused by urodynamic study: a blind, randomized study of 192 patients. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal prostatic biopsy: a prospective study of ciprofloxacin vs piperacillin/tazobactam. Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin versus placebo for prophylaxis during transrectal prostate biopsy. Postcoital antimicrobial prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract infection. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Single-dose fluoroquinolone therapy of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing single-dose to 3-day fluoroquinolone regimens. [Antibioprevention of recurrent cystitis. A randomized double-blind comparative trial of 2 dosages of pefloxacin]. Oral vs intravenous ciprofloxacin in the initial empirical management of severe pyelonephritis or complicated urinary tract infections: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Antibiotic prophylaxis for urodynamic testing in patients with spinal cord injury: a preliminary study. [Clinical significance of antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy].
We evaluated and compared the efficacy of post-intercourse and daily oral ciprofloxacin prophylaxis against recurrent lower urinary tract infections in 135 sexually active premenopausal women.
                Post-intercourse (group 1, 70 patients) and daily (group 2, 65 patients) prophylactic regimens of 125 mg. ciprofloxacin were started following a curative, conventional treatment of the initial acute urinary tract infection. Prophylaxis was maintained for 12 months and during this period patients were followed clinically and bacteriologically with urine and introital samples. Patients were subsequently followed for an additional year after the end of preventive treatment.
                While 3.67 urinary tract infections per patient in group 1 and 3.74 in group 2 occurred during an identical mean time of 12.2 months before start of the corresponding prophylactic regimen, only 0.043 infection per patient in group 1 and 0.031 in group 2 developed during prophylaxis (p < 0.0001). Before prophylaxis 86% of the vaginal vestibule cultures yielded gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae, equally distributed between both treatment arms, compared to 5.6% and 2.5% during postcoital and daily prophylaxis, respectively. The overall improvement in the incidence of the urinary infections per patient and the rate of introital colonization with enteric gram-negative bacteria was maintained after the end of prophylaxis, with a mean incidence of infections of 0.44 per patient (occurring in 34% of the total patient population), while 36% of all women had abnormal introital colonization.
                Long-term post-intercourse prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin proved to be equally effective as daily prophylaxis, and the major advantage of the former therapy was use of only a third of the amount of drug consumed in daily prophylaxis. The optimal duration of antibiotic therapy in older patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) is still a matter of debate. The aim of this randomized controlled double-blind noninferiority trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of 3-day and 7-day courses of oral ciprofloxacin for uncomplicated symptomatic UTI in older women.
                A total of 183 women at least 65 years of age with acute uncomplicated UTI were recruited from ambulatory clinics and hospital acute care units. Patients with pyelonephritis, contraindications to fluoroquinolones, recent use of antibiotics, urinary tract abnormalities and diabetes mellitus were excluded. Women were randomly assigned to receive either ciprofloxacin 250 mg twice daily orally for 3 days followed by placebo for 4 days (the 3-day group, 93 patients) or ciprofloxacin 250 mg twice daily orally for 7 days (the 7-day group, 90 patients). Bacterial eradication, clinical improvement and occurrence of adverse events were determined 2 days after completion of treatment, and occurrence of reinfection or relapse were determined 6 weeks after completion of treatment. Bacterial eradication and relapse were determined by urine culture. Double-blind procedures were maintained throughout data collection.
                The proportion of patients with bacterial eradication at 2 days after treatment was 98% (91/93) in the 3-day group and 93% (83/89) in the 7-day group (p = 0.16). The frequency of adverse events, including drowsiness, headache, nausea or vomiting, and loss of appetite, was significantly lower in the 3-day group.
                These results suggest that a 3-day course of antibiotic therapy is not inferior to a 7-day course for treatment of uncomplicated symptomatic UTI in older women, and that the shorter course is better tolerated. Patients receiving antibiotics during bladder drainage have a lower incidence of urinary-tract infections compared with similar patients not on antibiotics. However, antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with a urinary catheter is opposed because of the fear of inducing resistant bacterial strains. We have done a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of prophylactic ciprofloxacin in selected groups of surgical patients who had postoperative bladder drainage scheduled to last for 3 to 14 days. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 61), 250 mg ciprofloxacin per day (n = 59), or 500 mg ciprofloxacin twice daily (n = 64) from postoperative day 2 until catheter removal. 75% of placebo patients were bacteriuric at catheter removal compared with 16% of ciprofloxacin-treated patients (relative risk [RR] [95% CI] 4.7 [3.0-7.4]). The prevalence of pyuria among placebo patients increased from 11% to 42% while the catheter was in place; by contrast, the rate of pyuria was 11% or less in patients receiving ciprofloxacin (RR 4.0 [2.1-7.3]). 20% of placebo patients had symptomatic urinary-tract infections, including 3 with septicaemia, compared with 5% of the ciprofloxacin groups (RR 4.0 [1.6-10.2]). Bacteria isolated from urines of placebo patients at catheter removal were mostly species of enterobacteriaceae (37%), staphylococci (26%), and Enterococcus faecalis (20%), whereas species isolated from urines of ciprofloxacin patients were virtually all gram-positive. Ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants of normally sensitive gram-negative bacteria were not observed. Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis is effective and safe in the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection and related morbidity in selected groups of patients requiring 3 to 14 days of bladder drainage. To assess the efficacy and safety of a single-dose therapy for acute uncomplicated cystitis (AUC), we compared 4 treatment regimens in 120 women. Patients eligible for the study were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: Ciprofloxacin (CPFX) 200 mg in a single oral dose (group A); 200 mg once daily for 3 days (group B); 200 mg twice daily for 3 day (group C); and cefpodoxime-proxcetil (CPDX-PR) 200 mg once daily for 3 days (group D). The efficacy was evaluated 3 days after the single-dose therapy or at the end of a three-day therapy according to the criteria proposed by the Japanese UTI Committee. The overall clinical efficacy in a total of 107 patients was evaluated to be excellent, moderate, and poor in 72 (67.3%), 35 (31.8%), and 1 (0.9%), respectively. The causative organisms were eradicated in 88.0, 85.2, 85.2, and 82.1% of the patients in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. Recurrence was identified in 3 (2 in group A and one in group D) of 16 patients who were followed at 2 to 3 weeks after the treatment. No adverse reactions related to the antibiotics were recognized in the study. There were no significant differences in the clinical efficacy or recurrence rate among these four treatment regimens. These results indicate that the single-dose therapy of CPFX is the treatment of choice in women with AUC. To determine the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on infective complications after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate.
                Between June 1996 and September 1998, 231 patients who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria entered the study; the patients were randomized into three groups. Each patient underwent transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate after a cleansing enema at 06:00 hours. Patients in group 1 (75) then received a placebo tablet twice a day for 3 days; those in group 2 (79) were given a single dose of ciprofloxacin (500 mg) and tinidazole (600 mg), while those in group 3 (77) were given the same combination twice a day for 3 days. Urine cultures were obtained 48 h after the biopsy and blood cultures only from patients who developed fever. The complications (categorized as infective or noninfective) occurring in the three groups were compared using the chi-square test.
                Noninfective complications included were lower urinary tract symptoms, rectal bleeding, haematuria and perineal pain. The infective complications included urinary tract infection and fever. There was no significant difference among the three groups in noninfective complications (27, 29 and 31 in groups 1-3, respectively) but the incidence of infective complications (19, six and eight, respectively) was significantly higher in group 1 (P = 0.003). However, the difference was significant only for urinary tract infection (P = 0.01) and not for fever.
                In selected patients a single dose of ciprofloxacin-tinidazole is adequate prophylaxis for transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate. The present urinary infection rate was higher if no antibiotics were used. Continuing the antibiotic prophylaxis for 3 days offered no benefit over single-dose prophylaxis. To determine the efficacy of prophylactic ciprofloxacin in preventing urinary tract infections caused by urodynamic study (UDS).
                A total of 210 patients presenting for UDS during a 16-month period were offered enrollment in the study. A clean-catch midstream urine sample was taken 24 hours before and 48 to 72 hours after the procedure and after microscopic examination and culture were done. All patients underwent a standard UDS. The 192 patients who had sterile urine before intervention were included in the study. Randomly, 98 of the 192 patients were orally given 500 mg of ciprofloxacin 1 hour before the urodynamic intervention and 94 were not given anything. The patients who were found to have significant bacteriuria after UDS were followed up and treated properly.
                Eighteen patients (8.6%) who had significant bacteriuria in the urine culture before UDS were excluded from the study. The rate of significant bacteriuria in the urine culture after UDS was 7.3% overall, 1% in the prophylaxis group, and 14% in the controls, a significant difference (P = 0.002). The most common uropathogen was Escherichia coli (57%). Three independent risk factors were identified: not giving antibiotic prophylaxis before UDS; antibiotic use in the preceding month; and the presence of pyuria before UDS.
                Urinary tract infections after UDS decreased from 14% to 1% with a single dose of ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally before UDS. We recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing a UDS. To compare the efficacy of short-term parenteral prophylaxis with piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) with long-term oral prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin in preventing infective complications after transrectal prostatic biopsy (TPB).
                Patients scheduled for TPB were randomized to receive P/T (2250 mg intramuscular) twice daily for 2 days (Group 1), or ciprofloxacin (500 mg orally) twice daily for 7 days (Group 2), beginning on the evening before the procedure in both groups. All patients received a 100-mL phosphate enema 3 h before TPB. Evaluation included self-recording of body temperature in the 3 days after TPB, and culture of mid-stream urine (MSU) samples taken before and 3 and 15 days after TPB. Patients with indwelling urethral catheters or taking antibiotics or immunosuppressive drugs were excluded, as were patients with positive MSU cultures before TPB.
                Of the 138 evaluable patients, 72 received parenteral P/T and 66 oral ciprofloxacin. Bacteriuria (> 105 c.f.u./mL) after TPB occurred in two of 72 (2.8%) patients in Group 1 and in three of 66 (4.5%) patients in Group 2; this difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.1). However, of the five patients with bacteriuria, two were symptomatic and both were in Group 2. Pyrexia occurred in only one patient in Group 2 with symptomatic urinary tract infection, and required hospitalization. No other patient reported a body temperature openface> 37.5 degrees C or drug-related side-effects.
                This prospective study showed that short-term prophylaxis with P/T was associated with a low rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria, requiring no further treatment, whereas although the rate was similar on long-term prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin patients required further treatment, with one needing hospitalization. We recommend short-term prophylaxis with P/T despite its disadvantages of cost and parenteral administration. To determine whether antimicrobial prophylaxis could prevent infections after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate using automated biopsy devices.
                We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in which a total of 537 patients received either oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg or placebo before transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate. Repeated urine cultures and urinalysis were obtained at 2 to 6 days after biopsy and 9 to 15 days after biopsy. The primary determinant of efficacy was bacteriologic response (bacteriuria [more than 10(4) colony-forming units (CFU)/mL] versus no bacteriuria) at the 9- to 15-day follow-up evaluation.
                Two hundred twenty-seven (84%) of 269 ciprofloxacin patients and 230 (86%) of 268 placebo patients were valid for efficacy analysis in which a mean of four biopsies was performed. Six ciprofloxacin-treated (3%) and 19 placebo-treated (8%) patients had bacteriuria (more than 10(4) CFU/mL) after the procedure (P = 0.009). Six ciprofloxacin recipients (3%) and 12 placebo recipients (5%) had clinical signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI) (P = 0.15). In addition, no ciprofloxacin-treated patients compared with 4 placebo-treated patients (2%) were admitted to the hospital for febrile UTI after the procedure. Ciprofloxacin reduced the expected net costs of treating infectious complications after biopsy by $23 per patient for an overall annual savings of $68,195 in the five study groups when compared with placebo.
                Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin reduced bacteriuria after biopsy compared with placebo in patients undergoing transrectal prostatic biopsy and provided an economic advantage. In addition, this study establishes the actual rate of bacteriuria after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate without antibiotic prophylaxis to be 8% with a clinical rate of UTI of 5% and a hospitalization rate of 2%. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine the efficacy of postcoital antibiotic prophylaxis in healthy young women prone to recurrent urinary tract infections. Sixteen patients were randomized to receive postcoital administration of a combination product of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole, while 11 received postcoital placebo. The treatment groups were similar with respect to age, parity, diaphragm use, history of lifetime urinary tract infections, frequency of intercourse, and number of lifetime sexual partners. In over 6 months of observation, postcoital administration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was highly effective in preventing recurrent urinary tract infections. Nine of 11 patients who took the placebo developed urinary tract infections (infection rate, 3.6 per patient-year), compared with only two of 16 patients who received postcoital trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (infection rate, 0.3 per patient-year). Postcoital administration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was effective in patients with both low (two or fewer times per week) and high (three or more times per week) intercourse frequencies. Side effects were few and compliance was excellent. We conclude that postcoital trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is a safe, effective, and inexpensive approach to management of recurrent urinary tract infections in young women. To compare the efficacy and safety of single-dose and 3-day fluoroquinolone treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI).
                Adult women with acute uncomplicated UTI were randomized to receive either a single dose of gatifloxacin (400 mg), 3 days of gatifloxacin (200 mg daily), or 3 days of ciprofloxacin (100 mg twice daily). Patients were assessed at four points during the study: before treatment (within 48 hours before the initiation of the study medication), at the end of treatment (by telephone contact on day 3), and twice after treatment completion (5 to 9 days after treatment [test-of-cure visit] and 29 to 42 days after treatment [only patients with a bacteriologic response of eradication at the test-of-cure visit]).
                The bacterial eradication rate for the single-dose gatifloxacin, 3-day gatifloxacin, and 3-day ciprofloxacin groups was 90%, 95%, and 89%, respectively; the clinical efficacy rate was 93%, 95%, and 93%, respectively, for microbiologically assessable patients at the test-of-cure visit. Eradication of the most common uropathogens, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis, was achieved with gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Single-dose gatifloxacin was equivalent to 3-day ciprofloxacin in both microbiologic and clinical efficacy.
                Single-dose and 3-day gatifloxacin were microbiologically and clinically equivalent to 3-day ciprofloxacin for the treatment of acute UTI among women. Single-dose gatifloxacin may offer advantages over 3-day fluoroquinolone therapy for uncomplicated UTI by decreasing secondary use of medical resources and improving patient compliance. The aim of this randomized double-blind trial was to compare two 400 mg pefloxacin regimens either once-a-week or once-a-month applied for 48 weeks for the prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infection in women.
                The main outcome measures were symptomatic and bacteriological reinfections during the period of prophylaxis and rates of reinfections during the three months of surveillance following the end of prophylaxis. 361 women of 18 to 51 years of age suffering from recurrent lower urinary tract infection were randomly allocated to receive pefloxacin 400 mg once-a-week (group A: n = 185) or 400 mg once-a-month (groupe B: n = 176) for 48 weeks.
                Seventeen of the 185 patients in group A (9.1%) and 52/176 patients in group B (29.5%) experienced at least one reinfection during the period of prophylaxis (p < 0.0001). The rates of reinfection during the three months of surveillance following the end of the treatment were not significantly different between the two groups with 14/101 (13.8%) patients with at least a reinfection in group A and 8/75 patients (10.6%) in group B (p = 0.51). In group A, 49/174 (28.1%) patients reported at least an adverse event compared with 33/169 (19.5%) patients in group B (p = 0.06).
                Once-a-week treatment with 400 mg of pefloxacin can be considered as a new effective and well tolerated approach for the prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infection in women and does not entail excessive emergence of pefloxacin resistant bacteria, even after 48 weeks of treatment. There are few data on the efficacy of oral antibiotics in the initial empirical management of severe forms of urinary tract infection (UTI).
                In a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial we compared oral (500 mg twice daily) vs intravenous ciprofloxacin (200 mg twice daily) in the initial empirical management of hospitalized patients with serious forms of UTI. Exclusion criteria were severe sepsis, inability to take oral medication, or the presence of obstruction or renal foci of suppuration. The study population included 66 women with pyelonephritis, 43 patients with community-acquired UTIs, and 32 patients with hospital-acquired UTIs. The frequency of bacteremia was 28 (42%) of 66 in the patients with pyelonephritis and 25 (33%) of 75 in those with complicated UTIs. Seventy-two patients were randomized to treatment with oral and 69 to intravenous ciprofloxacin.
                There were no infection-related deaths and no patients required an early change of antibiotics because of worsening clinical status during the initial empirical phase of treatment. The mean duration of fever was 1.7 days in patients treated by the oral vs 1.9 days in patients treated by the intravenous route (P = .15). The rates of microbiological failure (3% in the oral vs 2% in the intravenous treatment group) and of unsatisfactory clinical response (4% oral vs 3% intravenous) were low. A treatment change was eventually required in 14% of the patients assigned to the oral and 7% of the patients assigned to the intravenous regimen, mainly because of the isolation of enterococci or ciprofloxacin-resistant organisms in pretherapy urine specimens.
                In the hospital setting, oral ciprofloxacin is as effective as the intravenous regimen in the initial empirical management of serious UTIs, including bacteremic forms, in patients without severe sepsis, obstruction, or renal foci of suppuration. The efficacy of the oral regimen indicates a potential use for ciprofloxacin in outpatient treatment of a subset of patients currently hospitalized on account of disease severity. This study was performed in order to: (i) determine the incidence of symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) in patients with spinal cord injury after urodynamic testing; (ii) evaluate the role of antibiotic prophylaxis for such a procedure; and (iii) investigate whether pre-existing bacteriuria predisposes to the development of symptomatic UTI after urodynamic testing. Forty patients were prospectively randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive a 3-day oral course of either ciprofloxacin (18 patients) or placebo (22 patients), beginning 2 days prior to the urodynamic procedure. None of 18 (0%) patients who received ciprofloxacin developed symptomatic UTI within 5 days after the procedure compared with three of 22 (14%) subjects randomized to the placebo group; the protective efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis, however, did not attain statistical significance (P = 0.24). None of the three bacterial isolates that were responsible for symptomatic infection were grown in corresponding urine cultures prior to the procedure. These findings may serve as a pilot for a larger study. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-dose oral antibiotic prophylaxis in the
                Between prevention of post-procedure infections in patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy. September 1998 and March 2001, a total of 192 patients who had an abnormal digital rectal examination and/or prostate specific antigen 4 ng/ml or greater underwent transrectal ultrasound guided systematic 13 cores prostate biopsy. The patients were randomly divided into three groups. Group A (62) received a placebo (Vit C) tablet twice a day for 3 days, group B (64) a single dose of ciprofloxacin (0.5 g) and metronidazole (0.4 g), and group C (66) the same combination twice a day for 3 days. Urine cultures were obtained 48 h after the biopsy and blood cultures when patients who developed fever.
                Noninfective complications included were rectal bleeding, haematuria and pain. Infective complications included urinary tract infection and fever. There was no significant difference among the three groups in noninfective complications but the incidence of infective complications in group A was significantly higher than in groups B and C (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference among group B and C in infective complications (P > 0.05).
                Our study shows single-dose oral antibiotic prophylaxis is effective and safe to prevent infectious complications follow transrectal prostate biopsy.
Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis for 6-12 months reduced the rate of UTI during prophylaxis when compared to placebo. After prophylaxis two studies showed no difference between groups. There were more adverse events in the antibiotic group. One RCT compared postcoital versus continuous daily ciprofloxacin and found no significant difference in rates of UTIs, suggesting that postcoital treatment could be offered to woman who have UTI associated with sexual intercourse.