A randomised open multicentre comparative trial of lamotrigine and carbamazepine as monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent epilepsy. A comparison of monotherapy with lamotrigine or carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy. Double-blind comparison of lamotrigine and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy. UK Lamotrigine/Carbamazepine Monotherapy Trial Group. Multicentre, double-blind, randomised comparison between lamotrigine and carbamazepine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The UK Lamotrigine Elderly Study Group.
The efficacy and safety of lamotrigine and carbamazepine as monotherapy in patients with untreated, newly diagnosed or recurrent partial and/or generalised tonic-clonic seizures, were compared in a randomised, open, multicentre study. Patients received 24 weeks' treatment with oral lamotrigine 100 mg (LTG 100, n = 115) or 200 mg (LTG 200, n = 111) or carbamazepine 600 mg (CBZ 600, n = 117). Efficacy measurements were comparable between the three treatment groups, although the higher lamotrigine dose was possibly most effective, with 60.4% completing seizure free compared with 51.3% (LTG 100) and 54.7% (CBZ 600). Both dosage regimens of lamotrigine were well tolerated. More patients on CBZ 600 reported adverse experiences, 66% versus 53% (LTG 100) and 58% (LTG 200), and of these a greater proportion were attributed to CBZ 600 treatment, 53% versus 23% (LTG 100) and 28% (LTG 200). Similarly, a greater proportion of the CBZ 600 group required a change in dose, 47% versus 20% (LTG 100) and 17% (LTG 200) or withdrew completely due to adverse experiences, 10.3% versus 4.3% (LTG 100) and 4.5% (LTG 200). The most common adverse experience leading to withdrawal was rash, with approximately double the proportion of reports occurring in patients on CBZ 600 (5.1%) compared with lamotrigine (1.7% on LTG 100 and 2.7% on LTG 200). Overall lamotrigine appeared equally effective but better tolerated compared with carbamazepine. Monotherapy with lamotrigine or carbamazepine was evaluated in a multicentre open trial of patients aged 2 years and above with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy. A total of 417 patients were randomised to treatment with lamotrigine, while 201 patients received carbamazepine. Following a dose escalation period of 6 weeks, maintenance therapy (Weeks 7-24) was adjusted according to response. Efficacy was similar with both treatments (65% with lamotrigine, 73% with carbamazepine, P=0.085). Efficacy was assessed by the proportion of patients seizure free during the last 16 weeks of treatment; all subjects who remained in the study for at least 18 weeks after the week 4 visit were included in the analysis. More patients receiving lamotrigine completed the study (81%), compared with those receiving carbamazepine (77%). This difference was primarily due to discontinuation as a result of adverse events, reported by 34 (8%) of those treated with lamotrigine but 26 (13%) of those treated with carbamazepine. The proportion of patients who experienced adverse events in the lamotrigine group was lower (218 patients, 52%) compared with the carbamazepine group (120 patients, 60%). The proportion of patients with adverse events considered to be drug related was lower in the lamotrigine group (132 patients, 32%) compared with the carbamazepine group (83 patients, 41%). Somnolence was the only adverse event reported at an incidence of greater than 5% and where there was a difference of 5% or more between treatment groups (4% lamotrigine, 11% carbamazepine patients). The small subsets of elderly patients (aged 65 years or over) and paediatric patients (aged 2-12 years) also showed better tolerability to lamotrigine than to carbamazepine. In conclusion, monotherapy with lamotrigine is as effective as carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy. Patients were able to tolerate lamotrigine better than carbamazepine, so more patients receiving lamotrigine were able to remain on therapy. Lamotrigine has been licensed widely as adjunctive therapy for partial and secondary generalised seizures. Use of the drug as monotherapy was investigated in a double-blind, randomised, parallel-group comparison with carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy. After 4 weeks of planned, fixed dose escalation, doses were adjusted according to efficacy, adverse events, and plasma concentrations. 151 of 260 patients (131 lamotrigine, 129 carbamazepine) in eight UK centres completed the 48-week trial. No differences in efficacy between the drugs were found for partial seizures with or without secondary generalisation or for primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures. The proportion of patients maintained seizure-free during the last 24 weeks of treatment was almost the same in both groups (39% lamotrigine, 38% carbamazepine). More patients with primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures (47% both groups) than those presenting with a focal onset (35%, 37%) were fully controlled. Overall, fewer patients on lamotrigine than on carbamazepine withdrew because of adverse events (15 vs 27%). The commonest side-effect leading to withdrawal with either drug was rash (9%, 13%). Sleepiness was less common in lamotrigine than in carbamazepine recipients (12 vs 22%, p < 0.05). More lamotrigine than carbamazepine recipients (65 vs 51%, p = 0.018) completed the study (hazard ratio 1.57 [95% CI 1.07-2.31]). Lamotrigine and carbamazepine showed similar efficacy against partial onset seizures and primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Lamotrigine, however, was better tolerated. In a multicentre, double-blind trial 150 elderly patients (mean age 77 years) with newly diagnosed epilepsy were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to treatment with lamotrigine (LTG) or carbamazepine (CBZ). Following a short titration period, the dosage was individualised for each patient while maintaining the blind over the next 24 weeks. The main difference between the groups was the rate of drop-out due to adverse events (LTG 18% versus CBZ 42%). This was in part a consequence of the lower rash rate with LTG (LTG 3%, CBZ 19%; 95% CI 7-25%). LTG-treated patients also complained less frequently of somnolence (LTG 12%, CBZ 29%; 95% CI 4-30%). Although there was no difference between the drugs in time to first seizure, a greater percentage of LTG-treated patients remained seizure-free during the last 16 weeks of treatment (LTG 39%, CBZ 21%; P = 0.027). Overall, more patients continued on treatment with LTG than CBZ (LTG 71%, CBZ 42%; P < 0.001) for the duration of the study. The hazard ratio for withdrawal was 2.4 (95% CI 1.4-4.0) indicating that a patient treated with CBZ was more than twice as likely to come off medication than one taking LTG. In conclusion, LTG can be regarded as an acceptable choice as initial treatment for elderly patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.
Lamotrigine was significantly less likely to be withdrawn than carbamazepine but results for time to first seizure suggested that carbamazepine may be superior in terms of seizure control. Trials were of too short a duration to measure important seizure outcomes such as time to 12 month remission. Further trials are needed in which longer-term outcome is assessed as well as measures such as psychosocial outcome and quality of life.