Evaluation of two local anaesthetic sprays for the relief of post-episiotomy pain. Is local anaesthesia actually beneficial in flexible fibreoptic nasendoscopy? Reducing postnatal pain from perineal tears by using lignocaine gel: a double-blind randomized trial. Comparison of topical anaesthesia methods for venous cannulation in adults. Expanding the use of topical anesthesia in wound management: sequential layered application of topical lidocaine with epinephrine. Effective analgesia following perineal injury during childbirth: a placebo controlled trial of prophylactic rectal diclofenac. The effect of local anaesthetic spray on the pain associated with local anaesthetic injection, prior to biopsy or loop diathermy to the cervix in the outpatient colposcopy clinic.
Aerosol formulations of lignocaine (5%) and cinchocaine (2%) were compared with a water-only placebo spray in a single-dose study in 76 primiparous patients complaining of moderate or severe post-episiotomy pain. In comparison with a water-only placebo, both local anaesthetic formulations gave significant relief when administered to the perineal wound but the lignocaine spray proved to be the more effective. The only side-effect reported was slight stinging occurring immediately after administration of the lignocaine spray in 2 cases. Serum concentrations of local anaesthetic post-administration were negligible. An interesting finding was that breast-feeding patients responded less well to this form of analgesia than patients in whom lactation had been suppressed with frusemide. Although the application of a topical local anaesthetic before fibreoptic nasendoscopy is routine practice in many otolaryngological outpatients, the actual benefit to the patient of this procedure remains in doubt. Eighty-two patients were recruited in this double-blind randomized control trial which compared the patients' experiences of fibreoptic nasendoscopy with nasal preparations of Xylocaine (lidocaine), normal saline, and no spray to the nose and throat. A visual analogue scoring system was used to determine scores for the overall unpleasantness of procedure, receiving a spray, and taste of the spray, and pain. This study has shown significantly worse overall experience (P = 0.001) and pain (P = 0.048) scores for Xylocaine spray versus no spray. It is concluded that the routine use of topical local anaesthetics within the nose before routine fibreoptic nasendoscopy is not only of no value, but actually makes the experience worse for the patient. Perineal pain is one of the most common causes of maternal morbidity in the early puerperium. Several randomized trials have shown that topical application of local anesthetics is effective in reducing postepisiotomy pain, but no randomized study has assessed the efficacy of local anesthetics for other perineal trauma. This study investigated if topically applied 2 percent lignocaine gel was an effective treatment for this group of women.
                A double-blind placebo controlled trial was conducted in a regional teaching hospital in the northwest of England. One hundred and forty-nine women who had sustained a first- or second-degree tear were allocated by sealed envelopes to the lignocaine gel or placebo group. The primary outcome was self-reported pain at 24 hours postdelivery as measured on a numerical rating scale (pain score). Secondary outcomes included pain scores at 48 hours, the need for oral analgesia, and maternal satisfaction. Based on a pilot study, we calculated that 128 women were required to detect a 25 percent difference in pain scores between the two groups with 80 percent power (alpha = 0.05). The pain scores of women in each trial arm were compared using the unpaired t test and 95 percent confidence intervals.
                Women using lignocaine gel had lower average pain scores, although this only reached statistical significance at 48 hours after delivery (p = 0.023). In general, women liked using the study gel. No difference was found in consumption of oral analgesia.
                This study suggested that lignocaine gel may be effective on the second postnatal day. Further research is required to assess the optimum timing of this intervention and the population that would most benefit from its use. A prospective, randomized clinical trial was performed in order to assess the efficacy and side-effects of commonly used topical anaesthesia methods in adults receiving peripheral venous cannulation. The study was double-blinded to the degree that the methodologies allowed. One hundred and fifty healthy adults undergoing elective surgery were allocated at random to five groups: EMLA cream, ethyl chloride spray, intracutaneous infiltration with 2% lidocaine, placebo cream and no treatment. Venipuncture was performed with a 18G cannula on the dorsal side of the hand. Puncture pain and pain caused by the topical treatment itself were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS, range: 0-100 mm). Haemodynamic response, difficulties in performing the puncture and side-effects were recorded. All analgesic techniques were well tolerated. Haemodynamic response and degree of puncture difficulty showed no differences among the groups. Puncture pain (median mrnVAS) following infiltration (1.0) and EMLA (10.0) was significantly lower than no treatment (30.0) or placebo (30.0). The benefit of local infiltration was altered by injection pain (11.5). Spray did not significantly lower puncture pain (26.5) and, in addition, was associated with discomfort (10.5). In adults, EMLA cream significantly reduces puncture pain and represents an acceptable alternate method for topical anaesthesia in venous cannulation. Local lidocaine infiltration is impaired by applicational pain, whereas spraying the puncture site with ethyl chloride has no analgesic benefit. Topical anesthesia eliminates the need for injection of anesthetic. Most studies on the use of topical anesthesia were done on children, using 3 active ingredients (lidocaine, epinephrine, tetracaine, or tetracaine, adrenaline, cocaine) for relatively small wounds of the face and scalp.
                To demonstrate that topical anesthesia is effective and safe in adults of all ages and for larger wounds, using a preparation with 2 active ingredients, topical lidocaine and epinephrine (TLE).
                One hundred patients were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial, with 50 in each group. The study group received TLE using a unique method of "sequential layered application." The control group received 2% lidocaine infiltration anesthesia. Patients rated the pain from the application of anesthesia and from suturing, using a 0 to 10 visual analog pain scale. Follow-up interviews were conducted to assess for complications and to rate patients' wound repair experience.
                Patients in the study group reported significantly less pain from TLE application, with 66% reporting no pain vs 0% reporting no pain from the infiltration in the control group (P < .001). There was no difference in pain during wound repair between the 2 groups (P approximately .59). On follow-up, 95% of patients contacted in the TLE group rated their experience in regard to pain as "excellent," compared to 5% of patients in the control group (P < .001).
                Topical lidocaine and epinephrine "sequential layered application" is an effective, safe, and less painful method of anesthesia for a wide variety of lacerations. Patients recall their experience with this technique very favorably. To determine if diclofenac suppositories administered prophylactically produce effective and lasting analgesia following perineal injury.
                A randomised double blind placebo controlled trial.
                York District Hospital.
                One hundred women sustaining objective perineal injury (second degree tear or episiotomy) during spontaneous vaginal delivery at term.
                Suppositories were administered at the time of repair and approximately 12 hours later. The suppositories were randomised prior to issue by the pharmacy department and contained either 100 mg diclofenac or placebo.
                Pain scores assessed at 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after delivery using a six point numerical scoring system and the use of additional analgesia and local treatments to the perineum.
                The mean pain score was significantly reduced in the diclofenac group at 24, 48 and 72 hours after delivery (0.86, 0.7 and 0.59, respectively) compared with the control group (1.64, 1.31 and 1.5; P < 0.005). In addition there was less supplementary analgesia required (eight women only at 72 hours compared with 15 in the control group) and this was limited to paracetamol or topical treatments to the perineum.
                Prophylactic rectal diclofenac provides effective analgesia after perineal repair and its effect appears to be maintained into the second and third postpartum days. We evaluated the effectiveness of local anaesthetic spray prior to injection of local anaesthetic before biopsy or large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix at colposcopy. This was a prospective, randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study involving 51 women. Pain or discomfort was measured using a four-point categorical scale and a visual analogue score. Our results show that the use of local anaesthetic spray has no effect on the pain or discomfort experienced by patients having local anaesthetic injections to the cervix, and cannot be recommended.
Evidence for the effectiveness of topically applied local anaesthetics for treating perineal pain is not compelling. There has been no evaluation for the long-term effects of topically applied local anaesthetics.