Randomised trial comparing expectant with medical management for first trimester miscarriages. A randomized controlled trial comparing medical and expectant management of first trimester miscarriage. First trimester threatened miscarriage treatment with human chorionic gonadotrophins: a randomised controlled trial. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin in the prevention of recurrent miscarriage: evidence for a therapeutic effect in women with secondary recurrent miscarriage. Improving cycle control in progestogen-only contraceptive pill users by intermittent treatment with a new anti-progestogen. Dydrogesterone in threatened miscarriage: a Malaysian experience. A prospective randomized control trial comparing medical and surgical treatment for early pregnancy failure.
To compare the efficacy of antiprogesterone (mifepristone) in combination with a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue (misoprostol) for outpatient treatment of miscarriages.
                One hundred and twenty-two women with first trimester miscarriages.
                The women were randomised to treatment with mifepristone 400 mg orally followed by a single oral dose of 400 microg misoprostol 48 hours later (n = 60) or expectant management (n = 62). Women were re-evaluated five days later. If retained intrauterine products of conception were found with an antero-posterior diameter above 15 mm on transvaginal ultrasound, surgical evacuation was performed.
                Eighty-two percent of the women randomised to pharmacological treatment and 76% of those randomised to expectant management had an empty uterine cavity after five days. Convalescence time was 1.8 days longer for women randomised to pharmacological treatment. Pain, bleeding, complications, and satisfaction with the treatment did not differ between the groups.
                Most cases of spontaneous incomplete miscarriage will become a complete miscarriage without intervention. This study shows that outpatient treatment with a combination of antiprogesterone and a prostaglandin E1 analogue did not increase the rate of complete miscarriage, compared with expectancy alone, by a clinical important degree. We aimed to determine whether outpatient treatment of miscarriage with vaginal misoprostol is more effective than expectant management in reducing the need for surgical evacuation of retained products of conception (ERPC).
                Of 131 eligible women with first trimester miscarriage, 104 agreed to randomization to either 600 microg misoprostol or placebo intravaginally. They were assessed the following day and administered a second dose of their allocated treatment if miscarriage was not complete. Those not successful after two doses were seen on day 7, and, if miscarriage was not complete, an ERPC was performed.
                The success rate of medical management was 88.5% (46/52) compared with 44.2% (23/52) for expectant management. There was no significant difference in success rate (100 versus 85.7%) in women treated with an incomplete miscarriage. Women with early pregnancy failure had a success rate of 87% with misoprostol compared with 29% with expectant management [odds ratio (OR) 15.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.26, 48.37]. The complete miscarriage rate was achieved quicker in the medical group than the expectant group by day 1 (32.7 versus 5.8%) and by day 2 (73.1 versus 13.5%) of treatment. There were no differences in side-effects, bleeding duration, analgesia use, pain score and satisfaction with treatment. Women in the expectant group made more outpatient visits (5.06 versus 4.44%; OR = -0.62, 95% CI -1.04, -0.19). More women in the medical group (90.4 versus 73.1%; OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.05, 1.50) would elect the same treatment in the future.
                Medical management using 600 microg misoprostol vaginally is more effective than expectant management of early pregnancy failure. Misoprostol did not increase the side-effect profile and patient acceptability was superior to expectant management. To determine whether administration of exogenous human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) treatment improve the pregnancy outcome in first trimester threatened miscarriages.
                A prospective, double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
                The Early Pregnancy Assessment Unit, Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton, United Kingdom.
                One hundred and eighty-three women with vaginal bleeding and a viable fetus seen on ultrasound scan (USS) in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.
                The patients were randomised to receive either hCG or placebo treatment until 14 weeks of gestation.
                The primary objective of the trial was to determine the miscarriage rate in the hCG arm compared from the placebo arm.
                Of the 183 cases, 87 were randomised to treatment with hCG while 96 were randomised to receive a placebo. Forty-seven (25%) did not comply with the study protocol. The mean [SD] gestational age at presentation was 7 [1.33] weeks. The mean [SD] age of women in study was 27 [5] years in the placebo and 28 [5] in the hCG group. The mean body mass index (kg/m(2)) was 25 [5] in the study. The number of patients actively bleeding per vaginum at presentation was 85 (93%) in placebo group and 79 (96%) in the hCG group. The median number of hCG or placebo injections for both groups was 7. Ten women (11%) in the placebo group proceeded to have a complete miscarriage, as did 10 women (12%) in the hCG group, relative risk (RR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 1.1 (0.63-1.6).
                Our study showed no evidence of a difference in the outcome of threatened miscarriages when treated with hCG in the first trimester, this may be because our study sample size was small and follow up was suboptimal. A large, randomised, multicentre trial is still needed to establish the usefulness of hCG treatment in cases of threatened miscarriage. Previous trials of intravenous immunoglobulin (IvIg) treatment of women with recurrent miscarriage (RM) have provided diverging results. This may be due to different inclusion criteria and suboptimal treatment protocols in some trials.
                According to a computer-generated list, 58 women with at least four unexplained miscarriages were randomly assigned to receive infusions of high doses of IvIg or placebo starting as soon as the pregnancy test was positive.
                In the intention-to-treat analysis, a 45% live birth rate was found in both allocation groups. In patients with secondary RM, 50% in the treatment group and 23% in the placebo group had successful pregnancies (P = not significant). When data from the present and a previous placebo-controlled trial of the same treatment were combined, 15/26 (58%) of the patients with secondary RM in the treatment group versus 6/26 (24%) in the placebo group had successful outcomes (P < 0.02). Only 7% of the karyotyped abortuses were abnormal.
                IvIg may improve pregnancy outcome in patients with secondary RM. A new placebo-controlled trial focusing on this subgroup should be conducted to confirm the results. The safety and efficacy of the anti-progestogen Org 31710 in improving cycle control in healthy women using the desogestrel progestogen-only pill was investigated in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
                A total of 103 women using the 75 micro g desogestrel progestogen-only pill daily also received either 150 mg Org 31710 or placebo once every 28 days, starting on day 1, for a duration of 4-7 treatment cycles.
                The percentage of women with bleeding or spotting (B/S) every day in the placebo group was on average 30% during the whole treatment period and no days without reported B/S occurred. In contrast, a cyclic pattern was observed for the Org 31710 group; a peak incidence of B/S was observed on day 3 or 4 of each cycle, followed by a sharp decrease on cycle days 9-15. Compared with controls, less subjects in the Org 31710 group reported irregular, frequent or prolonged bleeding. These differences were clearly observed in the initial cycles, but were somewhat less pronounced during the later cycles of the treatment period. A relatively high incidence of B/S episodes starting in the second section of the cycle was also observed.
                The addition of Org 31710 once a month improved cycle control in women using daily treatment with 75 micro g desogestrel. Threatened miscarriage is a common problem during pregnancy.
                The aim of this prospective, open, randomised study was to determine whether dydrogesterone was more effective than conservative management alone in preventing miscarriage in women with vaginal bleeding up to week 16 of pregnancy. Women were excluded if they had a history of recurrent miscarriage. A total of 191 women were randomised to dydrogesterone (40 mg stat followed by 10mg twice daily) or conservative management (control group). The treatment was considered successful if the pregnancy continued beyond 20 weeks of gestation.
                The success rate in the dydrogesterone group was statistically significantly higher than that in the control group (87.5% vs. 71.6%; p<0.05). Miscarriage occurred in 12.5% of women in the dydrogesterone group compared with 28.4% in the control group (p<0.05). There were no differences between the groups with regard to the incidence of Caesarean section, placenta praevia, antepartum haemorrhage, preterm labour (weeks 28-36), pregnancy-induced hypertension or low birth weight (<2500 g) babies. There were no intrauterine deaths or congenital abnormalities in either group.
                Compared with conservative management, dydrogesterone had beneficial effects on maintaining pregnancy in women with threatened miscarriage.
                Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. A prospective randomized control trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of single dose, 800 microg misoprostol administered p.v. compared with surgical evacuation for the treatment of early pregnancy failure. A total of 80 women with a diagnosis of early pregnancy failure were randomized to study (vaginal misoprostol) and control (surgical curettage) groups. Success of treatment, side-effects as assessed during, immediately after and 10 days after treatment, and patient satisfaction were compared. Intravaginal misoprostol was successful in 82.5% (33 out of 40) of the patients. None of the control group patients required a repeat evacuation. The number of patients who experienced significant abdominal pain following treatment did not differ between the groups. The duration of pain was shorter in the control group; however, they required more analgesics during this short period. The number of patients with significant vaginal bleeding, the duration or severity of bleeding did not show any significant difference between the groups. All 33 patients in the study group who had successful treatment expressed satisfaction, whereas only 58% of the control group did so. In conclusion this randomized control study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the administration of 800 microg of misoprostol p.v. for the management of early pregnancy failure.
There is no evidence to support the routine use of progestogen to prevent miscarriage in early to mid-pregnancy. However, there seems to be evidence of benefit in women with a history of recurrent miscarriage. Treatment for these women may be warranted given the reduced rates of miscarriage in the treatment group and the finding of no statistically significant difference between treatment and control groups in rates of adverse effects suffered by either mother or baby in the available evidence. Larger trials are currently underway to inform treatment for this group of women.