Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses. Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy in patients aged 65 and older. Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study. Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Effects of surgical trauma of laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy. [A cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with the open technic]. A prospective randomised study of laparoscopic v. open cholecystectomy in aged patients with cholecystolithiasis. [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-lap-cholecystectomy. Results of a prospective, randomized study]. Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of postoperative temperature. Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response. Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic and laparotomic cholecystectomy: a randomized trial comparing postoperative respiratory function. Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial. Comparison of postoperative acute-phase reactants in patients who underwent laparoscopic v open cholecystectomy: a randomized study. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Randomized comparison of conventional and gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative technique, postoperative course, and recovery. Blind versus open approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study. [Laparoscopic versus mini-cholecystectomy: analysis of hospital costs and social costs in a prospective randomized study]. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Recovery following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in either a 23 hour or an 8 hour facility. Metabolic responses to cholecystectomy: open vs. laparoscopic approach. Comparison of postoperative respiratory function after laparoscopy or open laparotomy for cholecystectomy. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: day-care versus clinical observation. [Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a prospective randomized study]. Randomized clinical trial of conventional cholecystectomy versus minicholecystectomy. A comparative study of early vs. delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. [Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as effective as hospitalization and from a social perspective less expensive: a randomized study]. Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Effects of open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy on oxidative stress. [Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study].
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rapidly become established as the treatment of choice for cholecystolithiasis. There is very little evidence, however, to support the claimed benefit to patients. In the present study 30 consecutive patients below the age of 65 years without acute cholecystitis and with no signs of common bile duct stones were randomized to laparoscopic or conventional open cholecystectomy. Median (interquartile range) intravenous consumption of pethidine with a patient-controlled injection device between 13 and 24 h after surgery was 125 (62-175) mg in patients who underwent the laparoscopic procedure and 200 (150-250) mg in those who had open operation. Urinary adrenaline and cortisol levels as well as those of plasma glucose, C-reactive protein and interleukin 6 were increased after surgery in both groups of patients, but without any significant difference between them. The mean(s.d.) duration of postoperative hospital stay (2.8(0.8) versus 1.8(0.6) days) and sick leave (24.0(4.4) versus 11.7(4.1) days) was significantly longer with open than laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The findings demonstrate obvious advantages of laparoscopic surgery as regards postoperative pain and convalescence, although factors reflecting the magnitude of trauma did not differ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has displaced open cholecystectomy (OC) in the management of cholelithiasis. However, there are few studies on the role of this technique in patients who run a high risk of surgical complications. We performed a prospective study in 264 patients aged >65 years undergoing surgery for symptomatic cholelithiasis. They were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique performed: OC (131 patients) and LC (133 patients). Conversion from LC to OC was necessary in 11 patients (8.3%). Mean surgery time was 70.9 min for the OC group and 75 min for the LC group. The LC group had a lower rate of postoperative complications (13.53%) than the OC group (23.6%). The incidence of mild complications was similar in both groups; however, the rate of moderate complications was significantly higher in the OC group. Hospital stay was significantly longer in the OC group (9.9 days) than in the LC group (3.71 days). These results suggest that LC should be indicated in elderly patients, as they are better than those obtained with with OC and involve a lower morbidity rate and shorter hospital stay. To compare laparoscopic with open cholecystectomy.
                Prospective random control trial.
                Central Hospital of Akershus, Nordbyhagen, Norway.
                74 consecutive patients due to undergo elective cholecystecomy between October 1990 and June 1991.
                Two patients were excluded from randomisation, and two were withdrawn after randomisation. The remaining 70 were randomly allocated to open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 35 in each group).
                Duration of operation and postoperative stay in hospital, amount of postoperative pain, incidence of complications, and duration of convalescence and sick leave.
                Laparoscopic cholecystectomy took twice as long as open (median [range] 100 [52-180] minutes compared with 50 [15-115], p < 0.01), but patients stayed in hospital half the time (2 [1-9] days compared with 4 [2-22], p < 0.01); required less opiate analgesia (4 [0-20] doses compared with 6 [0-13], p = 0.02; took less sick leave (11 [4-267] days (n = 18) compared with 34 [20-48] (n = 22), p < 0.01); and spent less time in convalescence (8 [3-40] days (n = 17) compared with 49 [10-247] (n = 12), p < 0.01). There were six complications in the laparoscopy group and seven in the open cholecystectomy group.
                Because of the significant differences between laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy we have now adopted the laparoscopic method as our standard, but we think that we can improve our results further by refining our operative techniques and giving our patients more information. Three hundred and ten patients having elective cholecystectomy were randomized to either laparoscopic cholecystectomy or mini-cholecystectomy. There were 155 patients in each group. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was significantly more common with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (13 versus 4 per cent) and complications were significantly more frequent with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (9 versus 3 per cent). If laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successful, hospital stay was significantly shorter than for mini-cholecystectomy (2 versus 3 days respectively), but overall the hospital stay was not significantly different. Postoperative analgesia requirements were reduced and return to normal activities and to work were faster after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There was no significant cost difference between the two procedures. To analyze outcomes after open small-incision surgery (minilaparotomy) and laparoscopic surgery for gallstone disease in general surgical practice.
                This study was a randomized, single-blind, multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC). Both elective and acute patients were eligible for inclusion. All surgeons normally performing cholecystectomy, both trainees under supervision and consultants, operated on randomized patients. LC was a routine procedure at participating hospitals, whereas MC was introduced after a short training period. All nonrandomized cholecystectomies at participating units during the study period were also recorded to analyze the external validity of trial results. The randomization period was from March 1, 1997, to April 30, 1999.
                Of 1,705 cholecystectomies performed at participating units during the randomization period, 724 entered the trial and 362 patients were randomized to each of the procedures. The groups were well matched for age and sex, but there were fewer acute operations in the LC group than the MC group. In the LC group 264 and in the MC group 150 operations were performed by surgeons who had done more than 25 operations of that type. Median operating times were 100 and 85 minutes for LC and MC, respectively. Median hospital stay was 2 days in each group, but in a nonparametric test it was significantly shorter after LC. Median sick leave and time for return to normal recreational activities were shorter after LC than MC. Intraoperative complications were less frequent in the MC group, but there was no difference in the postoperative complication rate between the groups. There was one serious bile duct injury in each group, but no deaths.
                Operating time was longer and convalescence was smoother for LC compared with MC. Further analyses of LC versus MC are necessary regarding surgical training, surgical outcome, and health economy. The effects of surgical trauma resulting from laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy, were compared by assessing the postoperative acute phase alterations of selected plasma proteins, hormones and lymphocyte subpopulations in fifty-seven patients prior to elective cholecystectomy. Patients were prospectively randomized to undergo either laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 30) or open cholecystectomy (n = 27). Duration of operation and general anesthesia was similar in the two patient groups. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients had a shorter postoperative stay in hospital (3.1 (0.5) days vs. 7.1 (1.6) days; p < 0.001). In open cholecystectomy patients a significantly greater postoperative acute phase increase in plasma C-reactive protein (p < 0.001), cortisol (p < 0.05), and prolactin blood level (p < 0.001) was recorded. The postoperative acute phase decrease in the blood total-T-lymphocyte count (CD3 cells) and in the activated-lymphocyte count (OKDR cells) was significantly greater after open cholecystectomy (p < 0.05). These results, showing that acute phase responses are less marked after laparoscopic cholecystectomy than after open cholecystectomy, support the concept that the laparoscopic procedure is less traumatic. The aim of this study was to compare the cost of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with that of open cholecystectomy.
                We analyzed the cost of both procedures regarding hospital stay, days of work lost and the cost derived from the morbidity of the complications of each technique in two groups of patients. With these data we were able to calculate direct and indirect costs of both procedures and compare them.
                Morbidity was similar in both groups and had no influence in the cost; cost of the material used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was higher; hospital stay and days of lost work were significantly lower for the laparoscopic procedure than for the open one. The total cost of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 23% cheaper than that of open cholecystectomy.
                Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to be cheaper than open cholecystectomy. As the laparoscopic technique becomes more widespread its cost might decrease even further. Between August 1992 and July 1993, 27 patients aged 70 years of older with cholelithiasis were prospectively randomised into 2 groups. Fifteen patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 12 patients underwent open cholecystectomy. Shorter operation time (93.3 +/- 25.3 minutes v. 176.3 +/- 26.1 minutes, P < 0.00001), fewer postoperative analgesic requirements (0.53 +/- 0.52 days v. 2.00 +/- 0.74 days, P < 0.00001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (3.93 +/- 1.71 days v. 7.92 +/- 0.79 days, P < 0.00001) and better cosmesis were found in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. The above data suggest that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for cholecystolithiasis in elderly patients. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCCE) was gaining acceptance rapidly, when several institutions could demonstrate the safety of this minimal invasive treatment modality. Nevertheless prospective randomised studies still are missing to prove the advantages of this new treatment modality in contrast to open cholecystectomy. 77 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were treated by LCCE (n = 40) or mini-lap CCE (n = 37) in a prospective, randomised study. As preliminary results, there were no differences in duration of anesthesia and operation time, perioperative complications or postoperative need for analgetics. Patients with LCCE had significant less postoperative pain, less restriction of total vital capacity and a shorter postoperative hospital stay as parameters of a diminished operative trauma. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to define the optimum management between early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis.
                Patients were randomized to receive either early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 h of randomization or initial conservative treatment followed by delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy 6-8 weeks later.
                There were 53 patients in the early group and 51 in the delayed group. There was no significant difference in conversion rate (early 21 per cent versus delayed 24 per cent), postoperative analgesic requirement (1 versus 2 doses) and postoperative complications. However, the early group had significantly longer operating time (122.8 versus 106.6 min, P = 0.04) and shorter total hospital stay (7.6 versus 11.6 days, P < 0.001).
                Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible for acute cholecystitis with the additional benefit of shorter total hospital stay. Apart from a shorter operating time, treating patients with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not offer additional benefit. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been shown to allow better postoperative pulmonary function than open cholecystectomy, with less incidence of lung atelectasis. As atelectasis following abdominal surgery is responsible for most febrile episodes in the first 48 h, it was postulated that with minimally invasive surgery there may be a parallel improvement in the incidence of postoperative fever. This study was designed to evaluate this hypothesis. Seventy-eight patients were randomly divided into two groups. Thirty-eight had an open cholecystectomy and 40 underwent the laparoscopic approach. Twenty-one of the 38 patients (55%) following open cholecystectomy had early febrile episodes compared with only 6 of the 40 (15%) in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. We concluded that there was a lower incidence of febrile episodes following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and suggest that this was related to improved pulmonary function and minimal surgical trauma. Open cholecystectomy (OC) has been superseded by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for the treatment of cholelithiasis, although this fashion has not been validated by prospective studies. Our aim was to compare the two techniques.
                Prospective, randomised, open study.
                University hospital, Finland.
                49 patients who required cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis confirmed by ultrasound.
                49 patients were randomly allocated to LC (n = 27) or OC (n = 22): 25 and 22, respectively, eventually had the operation. LC was done using a four-trocar technique, and OC through a transverse right subcostal incision, as short as possible.
                Length of hospital stay and the duration of the sick leave were the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures were: postoperative pain evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and the need for opioids; pulmonary function measured by forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak flow velocity (PEFV), and arterial oxygen tension (PaO2), and endocrine stress measured by plasma catecholamines, cortisol and glucose concentrations.
                The median (range) hospital stay was significantly shorter after LC than OC, being 2.0 (1-15) compared with 4.5 (2-19) days p < 0.01. The duration of sick leave was also significantly shorter after LC than OC, being 14 (7-17) compared with 29 (4-34), p < 0.01. Patients had significantly less postoperative pain after LC than OC as reflected by the need for opioids. Pulmonary function and arterial oxygen tension deteriorated significantly less after LC than OC. The stress response was equal. There were three documented complications, one pneumonia after LC and two wound infections after OC.
                LC gives significantly better results in terms of less postoperative pain, better pulmonary function, better arterial oxygenation, and shorter hospital stay and duration of sick leave. We report a prospective randomised comparison between laparoscopic and small-incision cholecystectomy in 200 patients which was designed to eliminate bias for or against either technique.
                Patients were randomised in the operating theatre and anaesthetic technique and pain-control methods were standardised. Four experienced surgeons did both types of procedure. Identical wound dressings were applied in both groups so that carers could be kept blind to the type of operation.
                There was no significant difference between the groups for age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy took significantly longer than small-incision cholecystectomy (median 65 [range 27-140] min vs 40 [18-142] min, p<0.001). The operating time included operative cholangiography which was attempted in all patients. We found no significant difference between the groups for hospital stay (postoperative nights in hospital, median 3-0 [1-17] nights for laparoscopic vs 3-0 [1-14] nights for small-incision, p=0.74), time back to work for employed persons (median 5-0 weeks vs 4.0 weeks; p=0.39), and time to full activity (median 3-0 weeks vs 3.0 weeks; p=0.15).
                Laparoscopic cholecystectomy takes longer to do than small-incision cholecystectomy and does not have any significant advantages in terms of hospital stay or postoperative recovery. The fact that pulmonary complications occur in 20-60% of the patients subjected to abdominal operations clearly indicates that the lungs are the most endangered organ during the postoperative period.
                The aim of this study was to demonstrate the impact of cholecystectomy on postoperative respiratory disturbances by comparing the laparotomic cholecystectomy with laparoscopic gallbladder removal.
                A hundred cholecystectomized patients were included in the prospective randomized clinical trial. Half of the patients were operated on by the laparotomic procedure, whereas the other half underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Spirometric parameters, arterial blood gases, and acid-base balance were determined before the operation, and at 6, 24, 72 and 144 h postoperatively. Abdominal distension was assessed by auscultating intestinal peristaltics, abdominal circumference measurement, and time interval to restitution of defecation.
                Six hours postoperatively, the values of ventilation parameters decreased on average by 40-50% from the baseline preoperative values in both groups of patients. The group of patients submitted to laparotomic cholecystectomy had significantly lower spirometric values and slower recovery of the ventilation parameters than the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. Abdominal circumference was significantly greater and the time needed for restitution of peristaltics and defecation was significantly longer in the laparotomic cholecystectomy group compared to the group of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
                Statistically significant impairments including hypoxia, hypocapnia and hyperventilation were observed in the patients submitted to laparotomic cholecystectomy, indicating the presence of objective respiratory risk, especially in elderly patients and patients with obstructive pulmonary diseases or cardiac insufficiency.
                Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rapidly become routine practice in the UK, there has been no rigorous comparison of it with open cholecystectomy. In our trial, 302 patients were randomised to laparoscopic or minilaparotomy cholecystectomy. Recovery after surgery was assessed by length of hospital stay, outpatient review at 10 days and 4 weeks, and patient questionnaires 1, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery. The mean operation time was 14 min shorter for minilaparotomy, while median post-operative hospital stay was 2 days shorter after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The hospital costs were about 400 pounds greater for the laparoscopic procedure. Laparoscopic patients returned to work in the home sooner; at 1 week, they had better physical and social functioning, were less limited by physical problems, and had less pain and depression. At 4 weeks, only physical functioning and depression scores were better in the laparoscopic group, and by 3 months there were no differences. Laparoscopic patients were more satisfied with the appearance of their scars. The incidence of complications after both procedures was 20%. Compared to minilaparotomy cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy results in shorter hospital stay, less postoperative dysfunction, and quicker return to normal activities, but is more costly. We investigated the effect of laparoscopic v open cholecystectomy on acute-phase reactants.
                Fifty patients were randomized to laparoscopic (Group 1) and 50 to open (Group 2) cholecystectomy. Preoperative and postoperative values for acute-phase reactants (ceruloplasmin, fibrinogen, Westergren sedimentation rate, alpha-1-antitrypsin, haptoglobin, and C-reactive protein) in blood samples were compared.
                Acute-phase reactants and length of hospitalization were significantly lower in patients who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy than in those who underwent an open cholecystectomy.
                Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears associated with a less intense stress response and less tissue damage than open cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has gained wide acceptance for treatment of cholelithiasis in preference to open cholecystectomy, though it has not been formally compared with mini cholecystectomy (MC). We have compared these two techniques in a randomised trial. 70 patients with ultrasound-proven cholelithiasis were randomly allocated LC (38) or MC (32); 37 and 25, respectively, underwent the assigned procedure. The mean hospital stay (including 1 preoperative day) was significantly shorter in the LC than the MC group (median 3 [interquartile range 2-3] vs 4 [3-5], p = 0.001) as was duration of convalescence (mean 11.9 [SD 9.1] vs 20.2 [16.5] days, p = 0.04). The rate of return to normal activities was 1.77 times greater in the LC group than in the MC group (95% confidence interval 1.01-3.11, p = 0.03). In regression analysis, the type of cholecystectomy done was the only variable significantly associated with the duration of convalescence. Although there was significant postoperative improvement in all of three quality of life scores in both groups, LC patients improved more quickly than did MC patients. This randomised trial shows the superior effectiveness of LC over MC in treating cholelithiasis. The positive CO2 pneumoperitoneum needed to create the working space for laparoscopic surgery induces cardiovascular, neuroendocrine, and renal changes. Concern about these pathophysiologic changes has led to the introduction of a gasless technique. Fifty consecutive patients with symptomatic gallstones were randomized to conventional (CLC) or gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy (GLC), with special reference to overall patient satisfaction, technical difficulties, duration of surgery, postoperative pain, and recovery. The overall exposure of the operative field was extremely poor in the GLC group, whereas the duration of surgery, steps involved in the cholecystectomy technique, length of hospital stay, and postoperative pain score did not differ significantly. After discharge, the median time to complete relief of pain tended to be shorter in the gasless group (5 days [range 1 to 15]) vs. the conventional group (8 days [range 1 to 15]). The period to return to normal activity was shorter in the GLC group (6 days [range 1 to 15]) compared to the CLC group (8.5 days [range 1 to 15]) (P = 0.031). No differences were found in terms of fatigue, dizziness and nausea, and overall satisfaction with the outcome. This study demonstrates a significantly shorter convalescence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy by means of the gasless technique compared to the conventional CO2 technique. Exposure of the operative field was less than optimal using the gasless technique. Intraabdominal structures may be damaged during blind introduction of the first trocar for laparoscopic operations. In this study, 150 patients with gallbladder lithiasis who underwent laparoscopy were randomly assigned to two groups, a blind (V group) or an open (H group), in order to compare the results and the rate of complications. No mortality was observed. Major complications occurred in 3/75 (4%) patients of the V group and in 1/75 (1.3%) patient of the H group (p < 0.05). Minor complications occurred in 5/75 (6.7%) patients of either group. The achievement of pneumoperitoneum required 4.5+/-0.4 min in the V group and 3.2+/-0.2 min in the H group (p < 0.05). The open laparoscopic technique is safer and faster than the blind approach; therefore, it is proposed that this approach be routinely used in all laparoscopic procedures. The aim of the study was to calculate the hospital and social costs in relation to efficacy of clinical outcome, hospital stay and time off work in two groups of patients randomly treated with laparoscopic or mini-cholecystectomy. One hundred and eighty-one patients with simple, symptomatic gallstone disease were included in the study; of these, 9 cases were excluded because of conversion to conventional cholecystectomy. Eighty-six cases underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 86 mini-cholecystectomy. Operative time (median time: 35 minutes) and hospital stay (median stay: 3 days) were the same for both surgical procedures. The median time off work was 10 days for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 20 days for mini-cholecystectomy (P = 0.007). Hospital expenses showed a saving of 820.48 euros for each patient undergoing mini-cholecystectomy. Since laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a shorter period off work, it seems to be cheaper with a daily saving of 164.96 and 146.51 Euros per patient, according to cost/effectiveness and cost/utility analyses, respectively. Consequently, although laparoscopic cholecystectomy shows a better outcome in terms of socioeconomic aspects and patient compliance, in an attempt to rationalize hospital expenditure, we would advocate mini-cholecystectomy for those patients who do not need to return to work early. The role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is not yet clearly established. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis and to compare the results with delayed cholecystectomy.
                Between January 2001 and November 2002, 40 patients with a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis were assigned randomly to early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 h of admission (early group, n = 20) or to initial conservative treatment followed by delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 6 to 12 weeks later (delayed group, n = 20).
                There was no significant difference in the conversion rates (early, 25% vs delayed, 25%), operating times (early, 104 min vs delayed, 93 min), postoperative analgesia requirements (early, 5.3 days vs delayed, 4.8 days), or postoperative complications (early, 15% vs delayed, 20%). However, the early group had significantly more blood loss (228 vs 114 ml) and shorter hospital stay (4.1 vs 10.1 days).
                Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is safe and feasible, offering the additional benefit of a shorter hospital stay. It should be offered to patients with acute cholecystitis, provided the surgery is performed within 72 to 96 h of the onset of symptoms. Research confirms that laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) results in shorter lengths of hospital stay and earlier return to usual activity than the traditional cholecystectomy procedure. Research in this area, however, focuses more on the medical aspects of patient recovery, but very few studies have evaluated how these patients manage their recovery at home or what types of problems they encounter. A total of 28 LC patients were randomly assigned to two groups: (1) 23 h stay (overnight) in a general surgical ward or (2) day procedure unit (DPU) stay. Data was collected by a self-administered Postoperative Symptoms Diary and telephone interview. Results showed no significant difference between the two groups of patients recovery symptoms scores. Problems with mobility, pain and elimination recorded the highest mean scores for both groups of patients. Overnight patients also experienced problems with tiredness and eating. All DPU patients were able to manage their postoperative symptoms, compared to only 44% of patients who had stayed in overnight. Carer assistance was needed with regard to activities of daily living, child care and reassurance. Results showed that with careful selection of patients, LC cases performed as day procedures did not impact at all on the patients' recovery trajectory. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered a minor surgical procedure. In a prospective, randomized study, we compared the metabolic responses to surgery in two groups of patients submitted to open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of the study was to verify if the latter caused less metabolic changes. Blood samples were drawn before the operation (basal), 1 h and 2 h after skin incision, and on the first and second postoperative days. The following parameters were studied: cortisol, renin, and leukocytes, including subpopulations. The mean values for age, weight, height, basal neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, basal values of cortisol and renin of patients, and sex distribution of group 1 patients (open, n = 20) matched with those for group 2 (laparoscopic, n = 20), with the exception of age (p < 0.05). No differences were detected between the two groups in terms of cortisol and renin values. However, the neutrophil count 1 h after skin incision was statistically significantly higher with the laparoscopic approach (p < 0.05). The lymphocyte count on the second postoperative day was also statistically significantly higher in group 2 (p < 0.05). We conclude that when a cholecystectomy is performed, the laparoscopic approach has no advantage over the open approach from the standpoint of the metabolic responses we studied. It appears that leukocytes have a more rapid return to normal values after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Although pneumoperitoneum is known to be responsible for important cardiorespiratory changes, no worse response was found in the laparoscopic group than in the open group. Cholecystectomy performed via laparotomy is associated with reduction of lung volumes including functional residual capacity that may lead to postoperative hypoxia and atelectasis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with faster recovery compared to open laparotomy and cholecystectomy. To determine whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with less pulmonary dysfunction, 20 patients (ASA Physical Status I) undergoing elective cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to surgical teams performing either laparoscopy or open laparotomy for cholecystectomy. Patients in whom one or the other surgical technique had to be performed for medical or psychologic indications were excluded from the study. A standardized anesthetic technique and postoperative analgesic regimen were used. Forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s; functional residual capacity determined by a closed-circuit, constant volume helium dilution technique; and arterial O2 and CO2 tensions were measured preoperatively and at 6, 24, and 72 h postcholecystectomy. Forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s were significantly greater (P less than 0.05) in the laparoscopy compared to the laparotomy group at 6, 24, and 72 h postoperatively. Forced vital capacity relative to preoperative values was significantly (P less than 0.05) greater in patients with laparoscopy (24 h, 70 +/- 14%; 72 h, 91 +/- 6%) compared to open laparotomy (24 h, 57 +/- 23%; 72 h, 77 +/- 14%). Similarly, forced expiratory volumes in 1 s relative to preoperative values were significantly (P less than 0.05) greater in patients with laparoscopy (24 h, 85 +/- 13%; 72 h, 92 +/- 9%) compared to open laparotomy (24 h, 54 +/- 22%; 72 h, 77 +/- 11%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The outcomes after traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC; one 10-mm port, one 12-mm port and two 5-mm ports) and minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC; three 3-mm ports and one 12-mm port) for gallstone disease were compared.
                The study was a randomized, single-blind trial comparing LC with MLC. Only elective patients were eligible for inclusion. LC was a routine procedure at the institution in which the study was performed, whereas MLC was introduced after a short training period. The randomization period was from January to December 2001.
                Of 175 patients who had elective minimal access cholecystectomy during the randomization period, 135 entered the trial: 68 underwent LC and 67 underwent MLC. The groups were matched for age, sex and preoperative characteristics. Median (range) operating times for LC and MLC were similar (45 (20-120) and 50 (20-170) min respectively). Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, the time for the patient to resume walking, eating and passing stools, and median hospital stay were the same in the two groups. The level of postoperative pain was lower in the MLC group at 1 h (P = 0.011), 3 h (P = 0.012), 6 h (P = 0.003), 12 h (P = 0.052) and 24 h (P = 0.034). Patients who had MLC received fewer injections of analgesic (P = 0.036) and more patients in this group expressed satisfaction with the cosmetic result (P = 0.001).
                MLC took a similar time to perform and caused less postoperative pain than the standard laparoscopic procedure. Reducing the port size further enhanced the advantages of laparoscopic over open cholecystectomy.
                Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. To determine the feasibility and desirability of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in day-care versus LC with clinical observation.
                Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been performed regularly as outpatient surgery in patients with uncomplicated gallstone disease in the United States, but this has not been generally accepted in Europe. The main objections are the risk of early severe complications (bleeding) or other reasons for readmission, and the argument that patients might feel safer when observed for one night. Quality-of-life differences hitherto have not been investigated.
                Eighty patients (American Society of Anesthesiology [ASA] I/II) with symptomatic gallstones were randomized to receive LC either in day-care or with clinical observation. Complications, (re)admissions, consultations of general practitioners or the day-care center within 4 days after surgery, use of pain medication, quality of life, convalescence period, time off from professional activities, and treatment preference were assessed. The respective costs of day-care and clinical observation were determined.
                Of the 37 patients assigned to the day-care group who underwent elective surgery, 92% were discharged successfully after an observation period of 5.7+/-0.2 hours. The remainder of the patients in this group were admitted to the hospital and clinically observed for 24 hours. For the 37 patients in the clinical observation group who underwent elective surgery, the observation time after surgery was 31+/-3 hours. Three patients in the day-care group and one patient in the clinical observation group had complications after surgery. None of the patients in either group consulted a general practitioner or the hospital during the first week after surgery. Use of pain medication was comparable in both groups over the first 48 hours after surgery. There were no differences in pain and other quality-of-life indicators between the groups during the 6 weeks of follow-up. Of the patients in the day-care group, 92% preferred day-care to clinical observation. The same percentage of patients in the clinical observation group preferred at least 24 hours of observation to day-care. Costs for the day-care patients were substantially lower (approximately $750/patient) than for the clinical observation patients.
                Effectiveness was equal in both patient groups, and both groups appeared to be satisfied with their treatment. Because no differences were found with respect to the other outcomes, day-care is the preferred treatment in most ASA I and II patients because it is less expensive. The discussion about laparoscopic appendectomy has increased since the introduction of this method. Randomized comparisons are still feasible, whereas this cannot be stated for other laparoscopic procedures (e.g., laparoscopic cholecystectomy). This randomized controlled trial included 170 patients. Open appendectomy was employed in 83 patients, and 87 were treated laparoscopically. The treatment groups were comparable regarding age, sex, Broca index, ASA classification, preliminary operations, and preoperative leucocytes. No statistically significant differences could be found with respect to surgical and general complications, operating time, consumption of analgesics and antibiotics, and return to work. The analysis revealed a statistically significant shorter hospital stay, a shorter time until return to normal physical activity, and a shorter duration of complaints for the laparoscopic group. We were unable to demonstrate any statistically significant advantage in using the open procedure. The main argument for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in preference to open cholecystectomy appears to be based on less traumatic incisions inflicted on the abdominal wall. To investigate the effects of different incision lengths on patients following elective open cholecystectomy, a randomized clinical study was conducted.
                In this study 130 patients were randomly assigned to undergo either open cholecystectomy through a transverse subcostal incision of mean length 5.8 cm, so called minicholecystectomy (65 patients), or to undergo conventional cholecystectomy through a paracostal incision of mean length 13.1 cm (65 patients). The perception of pain after operation was measured by a visual analogue scale. To register late complications the mean(s.d.) hospitalization period after operation was extended to 11.5(1.2) days in the minicholecystectomy group and 15.4(2.5) days in the conventional cholecystectomy group.
                The perceived pain and analgesic requirements were found to be similar in both groups. Twelve of 65 patients in the minicholecystectomy group and four of 65 in the conventional cholecystectomy group developed wound haematoma.
                On the basis of this prospective randomized study, the hypothesis that a smaller incision length on the abdominal wall could lower the level of perceived pain, and therefore decrease the postoperative analgesic intake after minicholecystectomy, could not be confirmed. To compare the outcome in early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of frequency of intra operative and postoperative complications and to determine the rate and reasons for conversion.
                A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed in the Department of Surgery at BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences from February 2003 to June 2004 in all patients with the diagnosis of acute calculus cholecystitis.
                Out of 145 cases, 50 cases were included in our study where 12 (24%) patients were males and 38 (76%) were females (M:F=1:3.16). The mean (SD) age of patients in early and delayed groups were 42.68 yrs (14.18) and 40.26 yrs (11.62) respectively. The mean (SD) duration of symptoms in early successful and converted groups were 109.24 hrs (43.66) and 132 hrs (49.96) respectively and the mean (SD) duration of symptoms in delayed successful and converted groups were 15.36 months (13.88) and 41 months (40.73) respectively. In early group, 17 (68%) patients had total leukocyte count more than 10,000/cmm and they had ultrasound findings suggestive of acute cholecystitis. Out of 25 patients in early group, seven had jaundice and ten had deranged liver function in the preoperative period. In early group 4 (16%) patients; and in delayed group 3 (12%) had to be converted to open cholecystectomy (P=1.00). In early group 10 (40%) and in delayed 5 (20 %) cases had intraoperative complications (P=0.122). The total hospital stay was longer in the delayed group. The postoperative hospital stay in early and delayed converted groups were higher than early and delayed successful group (P=0.081, P=0.082).
                Both early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy is possible and safe in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. To compare the effects and costs of an ambulatory treatment versus an overnight stay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
                Prospective, randomised.
                In the St Antonius hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands, 86 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis without comorbidity underwent either ambulatory (AM: 42 patients: 8 men and 36 women; mean age: 48.9 years (SD: 11.9)) or overnight stay (OS: 44 patients: 10 men and 32 women; mean age: 44.9 years (SD: 11.8)) laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the period 1 November 1997-30 September 1999. The following were registered: operative time, complications, hospital stay and readmissions, as well as reported pain, nausea, activity resumption, quality of life and patient satisfaction. The cost analysis was performed from a societal and hospital perspective.
                In the OS group one laparoscopic procedure was converted to open cholecystectomy, two relaparotomies were performed due to intra-abdominal haemorrhage and 1 patient had a catheter inserted due to urine retention. Two patients were readmitted, one for postoperative pancreatitis and the other for a retained bile duct stone. In the AM group one laparoscopic procedure was converted to open cholecystectomy, in 1 patient a wound abscess was treated with drainage in the outpatient clinic, in 1 patient there was peroperative stone loss without further complications and in 1 patient a catheter was placed to drain peroperative bile and blood loss. In the AM group 11 (26%) patients were kept overnight due to nausea and/or pain (n = 7) or one of the aforementioned complications (n = 4). Two patients were readmitted within 24 hours of being discharged due to abdominal pain. The average hospital stay was 3.1 (OS) versus 1.7 (AM) days. The quality of life, pain, nausea and activity resumption were comparable for both groups. Due to the difference in hospital stay, costs for the ambulatory procedure were lower.
                Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully performed as an ambulatory surgery procedure in 69% of the patients. The quality of life, patient satisfaction and resumption of activities in both groups were comparable. The ambulatory treatment was less expensive. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been performed as a day-care procedure for many years. Few studies have been conducted with primary focus on patient acceptance and preferences in terms of quality of life for this practice compared with overnight stay.
                Data from 100 patients with symptomatic gallstones randomized to laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed either as a day-care procedure or with overnight stay were analysed. Complications, admissions and readmissions, quality of life and health economic aspects were assessed. Two instruments were used to assess quality of life, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB).
                Forty-eight (92 per cent) of 52 patients in day-care group were discharged 4-8 h after the operation. Forty-two (88 per cent) of 48 in the overnight group went home on the first day after surgery. The overall conversion rate was 2 per cent. Two patients had complications after surgery, both in the day-care group. No patient in either group was readmitted. There was no significant difference in total quality of life score between the two groups. The mean direct medical cost per patient in the day-care group (3085 Euros) was lower than that in the overnight group (3394 Euros).
                Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed as a day-case procedure with a low rate of complications and admissions/readmissions. Patient acceptance in terms of quality of life variables is similar to that for cholecystectomy with an overnight stay. The day-care strategy is associated with a reduction in cost.
                Copyright 2005 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. The aim of the study was to evaluate postoperative recovery after hand-assisted laparoscopic or open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis in a randomized controlled trial.
                Sixty patients were randomized for hand-assisted laparoscopic (n = 30) or open surgery (n = 30). Primary outcome parameter was postoperative recovery in the 3 months after surgery, measured by quality of life questionnaires (SF-36 and GIQLI). Secondary parameters were postoperative morphine requirement and surgical parameters, viz. operating time, morbidity, hospital stay, and costs.
                There was no difference between the 2 procedures in quality of life assessment in the 3 months after surgery. There was a significant decline in quality of life on all scales of the SF-36 (P < 0.001) and total GIQLI score (P < 0.001) in the first 2 weeks in both groups (no significant difference between the groups). Quality of life returned to baseline levels after 4 weeks. Operating times were longer in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group (210 and 133 minutes, respectively; P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in morphine requirement. Neither morbidity nor postoperative hospital stay differed between the laparoscopic and open group (20% versus 17%, in 10 versus 11 days, respectively). Median overall costs were 16.728 for the hand-assisted laparoscopic procedure and 13.406 for the open procedure (P = 0.095).
                Recovery measured using quality of life questionnaires is comparable for hand-assisted laparoscopic or open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis. The laparoscopic approach is as safe, but more costly than the open procedure. A prospective randomized study was undertaken to compare early with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
                Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is associated with high complication and conversion rates. It is not known whether there is a role for initial conservative treatment followed by interval elective operation.
                During a 26-month period, 99 patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute cholecystitis were randomly assigned to early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours of admission (early group, n = 49) or delayed interval surgery after initial medical treatment (delayed group, n = 50). Thirteen patients (four in the early group and nine in the delayed group) were excluded because of refusal of operation (n = 6), misdiagnosis (n = 5), contraindication for surgery (n = 1), or loss to follow-up (n = 1).
                Eight of 41 patients in the delayed group underwent urgent operation at a median of 63 hours (range, 32 to 140 hours) after admission because of spreading peritonitis (n = 3) and persistent fever (n = 5). Although the delayed group required less frequent modifications in operative technique and a shorter operative time, there was a tendency toward a higher conversion rate (23% vs. 11%; p = 0.174) and complication rate (29% vs. 13%; p = 0.07). For 38 patients with symptoms exceeding 72 hours before admission, the conversion rate remained high after delayed surgery (30% vs. 17%; p = 0.454). In addition, delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy prolonged the total hospital stay (11 days vs. 6 days; p < 0.001) and recuperation period (19 days vs. 12 days; p < 0.001).
                Initial conservative treatment followed by delayed interval surgery cannot reduce the morbidity and conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Early operation within 72 hours of admission has both medical and socioeconomic benefits and is the preferred approach for patients managed by surgeons with adequate experience in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is established as the treatment of choice for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis and is now proposed for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. The aim of this study is to evaluate biochemical aspects of open (OC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). We measured the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and the levels of nitrite+nitrate as stable end products of nitric oxide (NO). MDA and nitrite+nitrate levels were increased at both surgical procedures compared to preoperative period, but the rise was more significant in OC than LC. These results showed that both OC and LC caused an increase in oxidative stress. However LC caused significantly less oxidative stress and the changes during surgery returned to preoperative values after LC in a shorter period. The beneficial effects of laparoscopic surgery may be related, partially, to less oxidative stress in the immediate postoperative period. A prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy was carried out fro December 1991 to June 1992 at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 50 cases in group A and open cholecystectomy in 51 cases in group B. All patients had a preoperative history of biliary tract disease and most had gall stones proved by sonography. There was no operative mortality in either group and the postoperative complication rates were 4.4% and 2% in group A and B respectively (p > 0.05). Prolonged operative time in group A was 85.7 +/- 25.2 min vs group B 48.0 +/- 13.9 min (p < 0.001). Postoperative bowel function recovery with toleration of a regular diet in group A was faster than group B (45.6 +/- 19.2 hrs vs 55.2 +/- 11.0 hrs, p < 0.001). The need for postoperative narcotic drugs with demerol injection was less in group A (40%) than group B (86%) (p < 0.001). The total cost for group A was NT $42139 +/- 7135 and for group B was NT $38085 +/- 7578 (p > 0.05). The interval of return to full activity for group A was shorter than group B (12.8 +/- 8.8 days vs 35.9 +/- 20.6 days respectively p < 0.001). Recurrent symptoms within the 6 to 13 month postoperative follow up period was 8% in group A and 11.7% in group B (p > 0.05). Only one patient in group B was proved to have a recurrent common bile duct stone by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and received choledocholithotomy again.
No significant differences were observed in mortality, complications and operative time between laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay and a quicker convalescence compared with the classical open cholecystectomy. These results confirm the existing preference for the laparoscopic cholecystectomy over open cholecystectomy.