[A randomized controlled trial with methotrexate (MTX), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and pirarubicin (THP) vs 5-FU alone in advanced or recurrent gastric carcinoma. Tokai Hokuriku THP Study Group]. Modified therapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced gastric cancer.
A randomized controlled trial was designed to investigate the therapeutic benefit of a combination chemotherapy consisting of MTX, 5-FU and THP in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric carcinoma. The patients were randomized into two groups; Group A patients (n = 37) underwent our combined chemotherapy, whereas Group B (n = 34) underwent chemotherapy with 5-FU alone as a control. There were no significant differences in various background factors between the groups. The median survival time was roughly 170 days after the randomization for the patients with advanced cancer (n = 26 for Group A and n = 25 for Group B), with no significant difference between the groups. Two long survivors, however, belonged to Group A. The median survival time of 161 days for Group A (n = 11) was longer than that of Group B (84 days, n = 9), but the difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of toxicities (leukopenia in particular) exceeding JCOG grade 3 was significantly higher for Group A, but no morbidity was observed. These results imply that patients with advanced or recurrent gastric carcinoma may benefit from a regimen of MTX, 5-FU and THP. In an attempt to decrease the toxic effects of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate (FAMTX) by reducing the dose of methotrexate from 1500 mg/m2, according to the original regimen, to 1000 mg/m2, the authors designed the modified FAMTX treatment that was evaluated in a prospective Phase II-III randomized trial.
                Patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomized to receive modified FAMTX treatment or supportive measures only (control group). In the middle of the study, the randomization was interrupted because of strong evidence of benefit in terms of tumor reduction and projected survival in the treatment arm receiving chemotherapy. By the end of the study, 30 assessable patients had received chemotherapy and 10 had received supportive treatment.
                The overall response rate was 50% (15 patients); 12 patients (40%) had partial responses and 3 (10%) had complete responses (CR). One patient with extensive peritoneal carcinomatosis attained a CR pathologically documented by laparoscopic examination and peritoneal biopsy. The median overall survival time of the treated group was 9 months, whereas that of the control group was only 3 months (P = 0.001). The median overall survival time of the responders was 16 months, and their median remission duration was 8 months. The regimen was well tolerated, with a very acceptable toxicity profile. There was one toxic death resulting from neutropenia and sepsis in a patient who did not receive adequate leucovorin rescue.
                This regimen appears to prolong survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer, and the reduction of the methotrexate dose does not seem to compromise its efficacy.
This review did not provide assured evidence concerning the effectiveness of TCMHs in improving quality of life or rate of remission, alleviating the toxicity or side effects of chemotherapy, or reducing short-term mortality. Limited, weak evidence showed that Huachansu, Aidi, Fufangkushen, and Shenqifuzheng improved leukopenia when used together with chemotherapy; and Huachansu, Aidi, and Fufangkushen were of benefit for adverse events in the digestive system caused by chemotherapy. These TCMHs did not improve the rate of short-term remissions. Large, well designed clinical trials are required urgently before any definite conclusions can be drawn about the value of TCMHs for advanced or late stage gastric cancer.