A prospective randomised evaluation of G-CSF or G-CSF plus oral antibiotics in chemotherapy-treated patients at high risk of developing febrile neutropenia. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to prevent dose-limiting neutropenia in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized controlled trial. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenia: a multicenter randomized trial. Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma treated with intensive chemotherapy. Use of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to increase chemotherapy dose-intensity: a randomized trial in very high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Improving treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenic fever by administration of colony-stimulating factors. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor ameliorates toxicity of intensification chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on hematologic toxicity induced by high-dose chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Efficacy and tolerability of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with chemotherapy-related leukopenia and fever. Cytokine efficiency in the treatment of high-grade malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: results of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study with intensified COP-BLAM +/- rhGM-CSF. GM-CSF in chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia--a double-blind randomized study. [Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of febrile neutropenia]. A randomised study comparing granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with G-CSF plus thymostimulin in the treatment of haematological toxicity in patients with advanced breast cancer after high dose mitoxantrone therapy. Value of different modalities of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor applied during or after induction therapy of acute myeloid leukemia. Prophylactic human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after induction therapy in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.
Febrile neutropenia (FN) remains a major dose-limiting complication among patients treated with chemotherapy. Haematopoietic colony stimulating factors (G-CSF and GM-CSF) made possible a significant improvement in the management of FN, both in the therapeutic and in the prophylactic approach. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis also permits a definite reduction of severe infections during neutropenia. Nevertheless, the possible role of these two interventions for secondary prevention of FN is still unclear.
                We conducted a prospective randomised trial by comparing the efficacy of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and the association of G-CSF with oral antibiotics in the secondary prevention of FN. We included in our study those patients who, after an episode of FN, continued to be treated with the same chemotherapy without reduction of dose intensity. They were randomised into two groups: the first received G-CSF (group G; filgrastim, 5 microg/kg day), and the second was treated with an association of G-CSF and amoxicillin/clavulanate plus ciprofloxacin (group G/ACC).
                Forty-eight patients were randomised (group G: n=23 and group G/ACC: n=25). There was no recurrence of FN among the patients receiving G-CSF and only one episode in the combined therapy group (p=1). With regard to the side effects, there was no significant difference in the two groups.
                The use of G-CSF for the secondary prevention of FN is extremely effective and allows the maintenance of chemotherapy dose intensity. Our study showed that the addition of antibiotics does not seem to be required. The effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on neutropenia, infection, and cytotoxic chemotherapy administration was studied in a randomized trial in patients receiving intensive weekly chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Eighty patients (aged 16 to 71 years) with high-grade NHL (Kiel) of any stage were randomized to receive VAPEC-B chemotherapy alone (39 patients) or with G-CSF administered as a daily subcutaneous dose of 230 micrograms/m2 (41 patients). Prophylactic ketoconazole and cotrimoxazole were administered to all patients throughout treatment. The protocol specified identical dose modification and antibiotic treatment criteria bor both groups. Neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] less than 1.0 x 10(9)/L) occurred in 15 of 41 (37%) of the G-CSF-treated patients and in 33 of 39 (85%) of the controls, giving a relative risk for control patients of 2.31 (95% confidence interval [CI], [1.51, 3.54]; P = .00001). Fever (greater than or equal to 37.5 degrees C) with neutropenia (ANC less than 1.0 x 10(9)/L) occurred in 9 of 41 (22%) of the G-CSF group and in 17 of 39 (44%) of the controls (relative risk for control, 2.26; 95% CI [1.01, 5.06]; P = .04). There were fewer treatment delays, with shorter duration (P = .01) in patients receiving G-CSF. Chemotherapy doses were reduced in 4 of 41 (10%) of the G-CSF patients and 13 of 39 (33%) of the controls (P = .01). The dose intensity of cytotoxic chemotherapy was significantly increased in patients receiving G-CSF (median of 95% in G-CSF group compared with 83% in control patients). Three vascular deaths occurred in the G-CSF group. Delays in the control group most commonly resulted from neutropenia (19 patients, compared with 2 patients in the G-CSF-treated group, P = .000007). Severe mucositis was the major dose-limiting toxicity in G-CSF-treated patients, but did not occur more frequently than in controls (15 patients in each group). Overall, patients randomized to receive G-CSF achieved a greater dose intensity than control patients, but this did not result in significant differences in drug toxicity (other than neutropenia), intravenous antibiotic usage, or hospitalization between the two groups. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) have been shown to help prevent febrile neutropenia in certain subgroups of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, but their role in treating febrile neutropenia is controversial. The purpose of our study was to evaluate-in a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial-the efficacy of adding G-CSF to broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment of patients with solid tumors and high-risk febrile neutropenia.
                A total of 210 patients with solid tumors treated with conventional-dose chemotherapy who presented with fever and grade IV neutropenia were considered to be eligible for the trial. They met at least one of the following high-risk criteria: profound neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <100/mm(3)), short latency from previous chemotherapy cycle (<10 days), sepsis or clinically documented infection at presentation, severe comorbidity, performance status of 3-4 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale), or prior inpatient status. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive the antibiotics ceftazidime and amikacin, with or without G-CSF (5 microg/kg per day). The primary study end point was the duration of hospitalization. All P values were two-sided.
                Patients randomly assigned to receive G-CSF had a significantly shorter duration of grade IV neutropenia (median, 2 days versus 3 days; P = 0.0004), antibiotic therapy (median, 5 days versus 6 days; P = 0.013), and hospital stay (median, 5 days versus 7 days; P = 0.015) than patients in the control arm. The incidence of serious medical complications not present at the initial clinical evaluation was 10% in the G-CSF group and 17% in the control group (P = 0.12), including five deaths in each study arm. The median cost of hospital stay and the median overall cost per patient admission were reduced by 17% (P = 0.01) and by 11% (P = 0.07), respectively, in the G-CSF arm compared with the control arm.
                Adding G-CSF to antibiotic therapy shortens the duration of neutropenia, reduces the duration of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization, and decreases hospital costs in patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia. We investigated whether Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could prevent myelotoxicity or accelerate hematopoietic recovery after intensive chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLCL). Forty-two patients were included in a prospective clinical trial in which alternating chemotherapy ESAP (etoposide, Solu-Medrol, cytosine arabinoside, cis-platinum), m-BECOD (low doses methotrexate, bleomycin, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, dexamethasone), MVPP-Bleo (mitoxantrone, vincristine, prednisone, procarbazine, bleomycin) were administered by 9 cycles. Each cycle was followed by 10 days of G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day) started five days after chemotherapy compared to a control group which received chemotherapy without G-CSF support. Leucocytes and granulocytes were significantly higher in patients receiving G-CSF compared to the control group. The total number of days of leukopenia (WBC counts below 2.0 x 10(9)/L and absolute granulocytes below 1.0 x 10(9)/L) were longer in the patients without G-CSF compared to those who received G-CSF (14.1 days versus 1.9 days). Delays in treatment were most frequent in the control group: 38% versus 4% in all cycles. Infection episodes occurred in 41 out of 168 cycles (25%) in the control group compared to 7 out of 172 (4%) in the G-CSF arm. Complete response was achieved in 12 out of 22 (54%) in the control group compared to 16 out 20 (80%) in the patients who received G-CSF. Toxicity secondary to G-CSF was mild. G-CSF can be administered safely to patients with DLCL and results in improved hematologic recovery after intensive chemotherapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To determine whether the use of a recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor ([G-CSF] lenogastrim) can increase the chemotherapy dose-intensity (CDI) delivered during consolidation chemotherapy of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
                Sixty-seven children with very high-risk ALL were randomized (slow early response to therapy, 55 patients; translocation t(9;22) or t(4;11), 12 patients). Consolidation consisted of six courses of chemotherapy; the first, third, and fifth courses were a combination of high-dose cytarabine, etoposide, and dexamethasone (R3), whereas the second, fourth, and sixth courses included vincristine, prednisone, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and methotrexate (COPADM). G-CSF was given after each course, and the next scheduled course was started as soon as neutrophil count was > 1 x 10(9)/L and platelet count was > 100 x 10(9)/L. CDI was calculated using the interval from day 1 of the first course to hematologic recovery after the fifth course (100% CDI = 105-day interval).
                CDI was significantly increased in the G-CSF group compared with the non-G-CSF group (mean +/- 95% confidence interval, 105 +/- 5% v 91 +/- 4%; P <.001). This higher intensity was a result of shorter post-R3 intervals in the G-CSF group, whereas the post-COPADM intervals were not statistically reduced. After the R3 courses, the number of days with fever and intravenous antibiotics and duration of hospitalization were significantly decreased by G-CSF, whereas reductions observed after COPADM were not statistically significant. Duration of granulocytopenia was reduced in the G-CSF group, but thrombocytopenia was prolonged, and the number of platelet transfusions was increased. Finally, the 3-year probability of event-free survival was not different between the two groups.
                G-CSF can increase CDI in high-risk childhood ALL. Its effects depend on the chemotherapy regimen given before G-CSF administration. In our study, a higher CDI did not improve disease control. Several randomized trials have tested the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in relieving chemotherapy-induced bone marrow suppression. However, the use of CSFs in the treatment of neutropenic fever remains virtually unexplored.
                This study evaluated the benefits of adding CSF therapy to the standard antibiotic treatments given to cancer patients for chemotherapy-induced neutropenic fever. The usefulness of CSFs was quantified in terms of reducing the following: (a) the duration of neutropenia, (b) the length of hospitalization, and (c) the overall cost of the treatment.
                A randomized trial was conducted to test whether the administration of either G-CSF or GM-CSF improved the outcome of standard antibiotic therapy (ceftazidime plus amikacin) in nonleukemic cancer patients with fever (> 38 degrees C) and grade IV neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 500/mm3) induced by standard-dose chemotherapy. Of 121 patients who entered the trial, 39 received G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg body weight per day), 39 received GM-CSF (5 micrograms/kg body weight per day), and 43 received a placebo beginning just after the first dose of antibiotics. Treatments were continued for at least 5 days (7 days with clinically or microbiologically documented infections) or until 2 days after fever subsided and ANCs rose above 1000/mm3.
                The median duration of grade IV neutropenia (ANC of < 500/mm3) was 2 days in both CSF arms and 3 days in the placebo arm (P < .001). The median duration of neutropenia with an ANC of less than 1000/mm3 was also significantly shorter in patients receiving G-CSF or GM-CSF (P < .001). The median duration of fever was similar in the three arms. The median hospital stay was 5 days (range, 5-14 days) in the G-CSF arm, 5 days (range, 5-10 days) in the GM-CSF arm, and 7 days (range, 5-34 days) in the placebo arm (P < .001). The median time on CSF was 4 days in both treatment arms. The mean cost of overall treatment was reduced by $1300-$1400 in the CSF arms compared with the placebo arm (P = .11 for G-CSF versus placebo; P = .06 for GM-CSF versus placebo; P = .7 for G-CSF versus GM-CSF).
                Adding G-CSF or GM-CSF therapy to antibiotic treatment shortens the duration of neutropenia and the duration of hospitalization in patients with neutropenic fever. A statistically nonsignificant trend toward lower cost was observed in the CSF arms as compared with the placebo arm.
                The benefits of CSFs to cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenic fever merit further evaluation in large randomized trials. Intensification chemotherapy improves the prognosis for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but results in considerable morbidity, primarily due to myelosuppression with resultant neutropenia. Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) shortens neutropenia following intensive chemotherapy, but potential benefits in the therapy of ALL remain inadequately explored. Accordingly, a randomized, crossover study was undertaken to clarify this issue.
                Seventeen children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and treated on standard protocols were randomized to receive G-CSF following either the first or second intensification blocks of chemotherapy. G-CSF was administered as a single daily subcutaneous injection of 5 mcg/kg from day 9 following the start of intensification therapy, and continued until the neutrophil count exceeded 0.5 x 10(9)/l for 3 days. Study endpoints were days of neutropenia (neutrophils < 1 x 10(9)/l) and severe neutropenia (neutrophils < 0.5 x 10(9)/l), days in hospital, days of fever, and days on antibiotics.
                There were significant reductions in the duration of neutropenia (95% confidence interval 3.8-8 days, P = 0.0001), severe neutropenia (95% confidence interval 1.8-7.4 days, P = 0.002), and days in hospital (95% confidence interval 0.9-6.3 days, P = 0.01) for children receiving G-CSF. Overall, the duration of neutropenia was longer following the second block (95% confidence interval 2.2-6.4 days, P = 0.0003), but this difference was abolished by G-CSF, and children, receiving G-CSF after the second intensification were more likely to restart maintenance chemotherapy on schedule (P = 0.05).
                G-CSF reduces the hematological toxicity of intensification chemotherapy and may allow improved compliance with treatment scheduling. Twenty patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose myelosuppressive antineoplastic drugs (cyclophosphamide 2.5 g/m2 or epirubicin 130 mg/m2, both every 3 weeks) as first or second line chemotherapy were randomized in a prospective study to GM-CSF 5 micrograms/kg per day (n = 11) or control (n = 9). Significant reduction in granulocyte nadir duration (2 days with GM-CSF vs. 7 days) and severity (0.4 x 10(9)/l with GM-CSF vs. 0.2 x 10(9)/l) was found. No difference in frequency of neutropenic fever or antibiotic use could be observed. Even though the patients treated with GM-CSF at random were more heavily pretreated with chemotherapy, there was a surprisingly higher response rate in these patients as compared to the control-arm, namely 64% vs. 28.5%. However, this difference was not statistically significant. No severe side-effects were seen, but presumably due to GM-CSF one patient developed an allergic type 1 reaction and one patient a possible pericardial exudation. Both were fully reversible after cessation of the cytokine treatment. 30 patients with chemotherapy-related leukopenia (white cells 1.0 x 10(9)/l or lower) and fever (temperature 38.5 degrees C or higher) were treated in a double-blind randomised trial with standard antibiotics and 7 days of intravenously administered recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF, 2.8 micrograms/kg per day) or placebo. GM-CSF administration resulted in a faster percentage increase of peripheral neutrophil count after 2 and 3 days of treatment, except in patients treated with ablative chemotherapy and autologous bone-marrow transplantation. However, GM-CSF did not shorten the period of fever or antibiotic administration. No side-effects were observed; in particular tumour necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-6 did not increase in the 5 GM-CSF patients tested. These data suggest that a subgroup of patients with chemotherapy-related leukopenia and fever may benefit from GM-CSF treatment in view of the observed effects on neutrophil count. In high-grade malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (hNHL) recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) was evaluated as support to chemotherapy. In a phase III trial, 172 patients (age 18-73 years, stage II-IV) were risk-stratified according to LDH levels and lymphoma size and randomized to receive rhGM-CSF (400 micrograms) (87 patients) or placebo (85 patients) subcutaneously days 8-14 of each cycle of an intensified COP-BLAM regimen. RhGM-CSF significantly reduced the length and nadir of neutropenia, the length of fever episodes, the frequency of all and of severe infections, and of hospitalization and antibiotic requirements. Complete response rates were 63% for all patients and 64% vs. 61% (n.s.) in the rhGM-CSF vs. the control group. Deviations from protocol in applied dosages of myelotoxic drugs and in cycle intervals maintained differed slightly in favor of the rhGM-CSF arm. However, there were no significant differences in overall survival between the GM-CSF treatment and control groups (21 vs. 23 months). Early relapse rates were markedly lower than in the standard-dose COP-BLAM/IMVP-16 regimen. Thus, GM-CSF abates toxic side effects of chemotherapy and may help to maintain dose intensity in high-risk hNHL. Modern chemotherapy programmes render patients susceptible to bacterial and fungal infections, and the risk of developing febrile neutropenia after a chemotherapy course is in proportion to the severity and duration of the neutropenia thus caused. This double-blind randomized study presents details of 29 patients who developed febrile neutropenia an average of 10 days after their course of chemotherapy for different types and stages of malignancy. Fourteen received granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and 15 placebo during 7 consecutive days as subcutaneous injections. The GM-CSF group demonstrated significant increases in total white blood cell count (TWBC) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) from the morning of the third day of the study. The study concludes that GM-CSF has an important therapeutic role in the treatment of febrile neutropenia that arises during intensive chemotherapy programmes but further studies of dosage and therapy duration are required, as is the development of methods of assessing bone marrow vitality. To determine whether granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) used in addition to antibiotic therapy, in patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia shortens the period of fever, neutropenia and hospitalization.
                The study was prospective. Patients with lymphoblastic acute leukemia (LAL) were included. They received intensive chemotherapy of induction, intensification, or consolidation. At random, a group received amikacin-ceftriaxone; if no had response after 3 days, we added vancomicin and, after 7 days, amphotericin. The other group received in addition these antibiotics, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
                The groups were comparable in the magnitude of the initial neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9)/L), site of the infection, chemotherapy received germs isolated, age, and sex. The patients of the group that received FEC-G were cured in the course of 3.1 days; in the group without FEC-G, this occurred in 7.2 days (p = 0.0001). At the end of the infectious episode, the number of neutrophils, in the group with FEC-G, was of 1.9 x 10(9)/L versus 0.7 x 10(9)/L (p = 0.0009). The mortality was of one and two cases (p = 0.46). The global mortality was 7.5%.
                The addition of FEC-G to the treatment with antibiotics, in febrile neutropenia, decreases duration of days with fever, hospitalization and neutropenia. However, the frequency of cure is not augmented. 54 patients with advanced breast cancer were randomised into a prospective, non-blinded, controlled trial to receive: mitoxantrone 28 mg/m2 intravenous day 1 and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms/kg/day subcutaneously days 2 to 16 (n = 27) or the same regimen plus thymostimulin (TS) 50 mg/day intramuscular at days 2 to 16 (n = 27). The median time to reach a neutrophil count greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/l was lower in the G-CSF+TS treated group (9.13 versus 3.24 days; P < 0.0005). More patients experienced neutropenic fever in the G-CSF group than in the G-CSF+TS group (59.3% versus 22.2%, P = 0.0119). The incidence, duration and severity of clinically or bacteriologically documented infection were lower in patients who received TS. 16 patients (59.3%) in the G-CSF group contracted infection, and 4 patients (14.8%) receiving G-CSF+TS (P = 0.0016). These data indicate that the combination of G-CSF and TS is well-tolerated and may enhance haematological recovery following myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. The hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) introduced into induction chemotherapy (CT) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) might be of benefit to treatment outcome by at least two mechanisms. HGFs given on days simultaneously with CT might sensitize the leukemic cells and enhance their susceptibility to CT. HGFs applied after CT might hasten hematopoietic recovery and reduce morbidity or mortality.
                We set out to evaluate the use of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; 5 microg/kg) in a prospective randomized study of factorial design (yes or no GM-CSF during CT, and yes or no GM-CSF after CT) in patients aged 15 to 60 years (mean, 42) with newly diagnosed AML. GM-CSF was applied as follows: during CT only (+/-, n = 64 assessable patients), GM-CSF during and following CT (+/+, n = 66), no GM-CSF (-/-, n = 63), or GM-CSF after CT only (-/+, n = 60).
                The complete response (CR) rate was 77%. At a median follow-up time of 42 months, probabilities of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years were 38% and 37% in all patients. CR rates, OS, and DFS did not differ between the treatment groups (intention-to-treat analysis). Neutrophil recovery (1.0 x 10(9)/L) and monocyte recovery were significantly faster in patients who received GM-CSF after CT (26 days v 30 days; neutrophils, P < .001; monocytes, P < .005). Platelet regeneration, transfusion requirements, use of antibiotics, frequency of infections, and duration of hospitalization did not vary as a function of any of the therapeutic GM-CSF modalities. More frequent side effects (eg, fever and fluid retention) were noted in GM-CSF-treated patients predominantly related to the use of GM-CSF during CT.
                Priming of AML cells to the cytotoxic effects of CT by the use of GM-CSF during CT or accelerating myeloid recovery by the use of GM-CSF after CT does not significantly improve treatment outcome of young and middle-aged adults with newly diagnosed AML. Children with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) have a high risk of infectious complications that might be reduced by prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). However, G-CSF could induce AML blast proliferation. The prospective randomized trial AML-BFM 98 investigated the impact of G-CSF on hematopoetic recovery and infectious complications (primary endpoints) and on outcome (secondary endpoint) in children (aged 0-18 years) with de novo AML. Patients with more than 5% blasts in day-15 bone marrow or with FAB M3 were not included. Between 1998 and 2003, 161 children with AML were randomized to receive G-CSF after inductions 1 and 2, whereas 156 patients were assigned to the control group. Time of neutropenia after inductions 1 and 2 was significantly shorter in the G-CSF group (23 vs 18 days and 16 vs 11 days; P=.02 and=.001, respectively). G-CSF did not decrease the incidence of febrile neutropenia (72 and 36 patients vs 78 and 37 patients, respectively), microbiologically documented infections (27 and 25 patients vs 36 and 19 patients, respectively) and infection-associated mortality (5 vs 2 patients). Both groups had similar 5-year event-free survival (EFS; 59%+/-4% vs 58%+/-4%). Since G-CSF does not influence the risk of infectious complications or outcome in children undergoing therapy for AML, one cannot advocate the routine use of G-CSF in this patient group.
G-CSF and GM-CSF, when used as a prophylaxis in patients with malignant lymphoma undergoing conventional chemotherapy, reduce the risk of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and infection. However, based on the randomised trials currently available, there is no evidence that either G-CSF or GM-CSF provide a significant advantage in terms of complete tumour response, FFTF or OS.