Effect of restricting dietary protein on the progression of renal failure in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Protein-restricted diets in chronic renal failure: a four year follow-up shows limited indications. Adequate protein dietary restriction in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with chronic renal failure. Nutritional treatment of renal failure in type 1 diabetic nephropathy. Protein restriction, glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized trial. The effect of protein restriction on the progression of renal insufficiency. Effect of dietary protein restriction on functional renal reserve in diabetic nephropathy. Severe dietary protein restriction in overt diabetic nephropathy: benefits or risks? Reduced albuminuria after dietary protein restriction in insulin-dependent diabetic patients with clinical nephropathy. Randomised multicentre study of a low-protein diet on the progression of chronic renal failure in children. European Study Group of Nutritional Treatment of Chronic Renal Failure in Childhood.
Restriction of dietary protein may slow the progression of renal failure in diverse renal diseases, but the extent to which such a diet is beneficial in patients with diabetic nephropathy is uncertain.
                We studied the effect of reduced intake of protein and phosphorus on the progression of renal disease in 35 patients with insulin-dependent (Type I) diabetes mellitus and clinically evident nephropathy. The low-protein, low-phosphorus diet contained 0.6 g of protein per kilogram of ideal body weight per day, 500 to 1000 mg of phosphorus, and 2000 mg of sodium. The control diet consisted of the patient's prestudy diet with the stipulation that it contain 2000 mg of sodium and at least 1 g of protein per kilogram per day and 1000 mg of phosphorus. Renal function was assessed by measurement of iothalamate and creatinine clearances at intervals of 3 to 6 months, and the patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months (mean, 34.7). The declines in mean glomerular filtration rates were compared between groups by linear-regression analysis of the glomerular filtration rate as a function of time.
                The patients who followed the study diet for a mean of 37.1 months had declines in iothalamate clearance of 0.0043 ml per second per month and in creatinine clearance of 0.0055 ml per second per month. The comparable values in the control group were 0.0168 and 0.0135, respectively (P less than 0.05). Blood pressure was well controlled, and the degree of glycemic control was comparable in both groups.
                Dietary restriction of protein and phosphorus can retard the progression of renal failure in patients with Type I diabetes mellitus who have nephropathy. We believe that wider use of this treatment is indicated. Several retrospective and prospective studies confirmed the beneficial effect of dietary protein restriction (DPR) on the downhill course of renal function in chronic kidney disease. The long-term results of this therapeutic modality may be different than the short-term effects. In our nephrology outpatient department, a prospective randomized trial has been in progress since April, 1982. In 1984, we reported a general beneficial effect of our diet after two years of follow-up. Two hundred and forty-eight patients with initial creatinine clearances between 10 and 60 ml/min entered the trial. Patients were stratified for sex, age and degree of renal insufficiency. One hundred and twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to a DPR-group (0.4 to 0.6 g/kg/day); 118 patients to a control group. Patients on DPR visited the dietitian every three months during the first 24 months of the study; thereafter, as with the controls, the dietitian visits were only for specific needs. Urea excretion decreased significantly in DPR patients as a sign of good compliance and stayed at that level, even without frequent visits to the dietitian. Biochemical parameters showed no signs of malnutrition. Amino acid profiles were related to the degree of renal failure. The diet appeared to have a selective effect on the progression rate of renal failure: only patients with primary glomerular disease responded to the diet. Furthermore, there were striking intersex differences. Males showed a more rapid decline towards end-stage renal failure, but responded in a positive way to the diet, whereas female patients did not benefit from the dietary manipulation at all.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To evaluate whether a dietary protein restriction is useful for slowing the progression of chronic renal failure (CRF) in diabetic and nondiabetic patients and to analyze the possible risk of malnutrition after such a dietary regimen.
                Prospective, randomized case-control clinical trial.
                Nephrology outpatients.
                A total of 169 patients, 89 affected with CRF and chronic hypertension and 80 affected with overt diabetic nephropathy (24 suffering from type 1 and 56 from type 2 diabetes) and chronic hypertension.
                Diabetic patients and nondiabetic patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: 40 diabetic patients received a low-protein diet (0.8 g/kg/day) and 40 were maintained on a free protein diet; similarly, 44 nondiabetic patients received a low-protein diet (0.6 g/kg/day) and 45 were maintained on a free protein diet. The investigation lasted 1 year.
                Renal function and nutritional status.
                At the end of the study, there were no statistically significant differences in renal function between treated and nontreated diabetic patients, whereas treated nondiabetic patients showed a lower decrease in renal function compared with the nontreated group. In both diabetic and nondiabetic patients, the mean body weight and obesity index decreased significantly in treated patients compared with nontreated ones. Serum albumin and prealbumin were stable in all patients during the whole study time, and there were no other signs of malnutrition.
                An adequate dietary protein restriction is accepted by patients, and it is well tolerated during a 12-month follow-up. Without any sign of malnutrition, it is possible to get near the ideal body weight and to reduce the obesity index and the body mass index, which are both well-established risk factors for developing cardiovascular pathology. In nondiabetic patients only, we observed a significant slowing of the progression of renal damage. This study reports the effects of a low-protein, low-phosphorus, supplemented diet in 8 type 1 diabetics with renal failure. The rate of decline of creatinine clearance, the changes of the urinary protein loss, of total serum protein, of the daily insulin requirement, of the nutritional status and of some hormonal derangements were examined. The rate of decline of creatinine clearance decreased from 1.38 +/- 0.27 ml/min/month during a previous 15.9-month period of unrestricted protein diet, to 0.03 +/- 0.37 ml/min/month during the 17.4 months on supplemented diet. Urinary protein loss significantly decreased, and total serum protein increased. The daily insulin requirement decreased and no deterioration of the nutritional status occurred. Secondary hyperparathyroidism was partially reversed and the mild hypothyroidism corrected. A restricted protein and phosphorus diet supplemented with essential amino acids and ketoanalogs seems to exert several beneficial and no unwanted side effects in type 1 diabetics with renal failure. Protein restriction delays the progression of non-diabetic and type 1 diabetic renal disorders. This study assessed whether protein restriction delays the onset or early progression of renal disorders in type 2 diabetes.
                Randomized controlled trial. Outcomes were albuminuria (mg/24 h) and, as an estimate of the glomerular filtration rate, cimetidine-influenced creatinine clearance.
                Primary care.
                Patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria or at least detectable albuminuria, or a diabetes duration >5 y.
                The experimental group received dietary counselling on protein restriction (n=63); a control group (n=68) received the usual dietary advice. The duration of intervention and follow-up was 28+/-7 months.
                After 6 months, protein intake differed only by 0.08 g/kg/day between the study groups. Subsequently, this difference decreased and eventually disappeared. An initial effect of protein restriction on albuminuria in favor of the experimental group was not sustained, and the glomerular filtration rate decreased in the experimental group at a 1.6+/-2.2 ml/min/1.73 m(2) y lower rate than in the control group (P=0.5). Comparison of patients in the experimental group with a decrease in protein intake of at least 0.20 g/kg/day, with controls with no decrease, indicated a similarly small and insignificant effect on glomerular filtration rate.
                It is concluded that, in the longer term prevention or delay of renal damage in patients with type 2 diabetes, protein restriction is neither feasible nor efficacious. Dietary protein intake may be an important determinant of the rate of decline in renal function in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. We conducted a prospective, randomized study of the efficacy of protein restriction in slowing the rate of progression of renal impairment. The study lasted 18 months and included 64 patients with serum creatinine concentrations ranging from 350 to 1000 micromol per liter. The patients were randomly assigned to follow either a regular diet or an isocaloric protein-restricted diet (0.4 g of protein per kilogram of the body weight per day). Blood-pressure levels and the balance between calcium and phosphate were similar in the two groups. End-stage renal failure developed in 9 of the 33 patients (27 percent) who followed the regular diet during the study, as compared with 2 of the 31 patients (6 percent) who followed the protein-restricted diet (P less than 0.05). The mean (+/- SE) glomerular filtration rate, as measured by the clearance of 51Cr bound to EDTA, fell from 0.25 +/- 0.03 to 0.10 +/- 0.05 ml per second (P less than 0.01) in the group on the regular diet, whereas it fell from 0.23 +/- 0.04 to 0.20 +/- 0.05 ml per second (P not significant) in the group on the protein-restricted diet. We conclude that dietary protein restriction is effective in slowing the rate of progression of chronic renal failure. Functional renal reserve in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, as determined by the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) response test, is a measure of the capacity of the kidney to increase glomerular filtration in response to the stimulus of a protein meal or amino acid infusion. This 12-month study evaluated the changes in functional renal reserve in eight patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus with nephropathy (micro-albuminuria [greater than or equal to 30 micrograms/minute]) who chronically decreased their dietary protein intake to a mean of 0.6 g/kg/day (Group 1) compared with a group of similar patients (n = 7) who maintained their unusual dietary protein intake (1.0 g/kg/day, Group 2). Patients were evaluated and measurements taken at 3-, 6-, and 12-month intervals. Absolute and percent increases in GFR were calculated from three averaged 1-hour measurements after an 80-g protein test meal.
                Although the initial absolute mean rise (14 +/- 12 versus 18 +/- 13 mL/minute/1.73 m2) in GFR and maximal percent rise (16% +/- 16% versus 32% +/- 27%) after the meal did not differ significantly between the two groups, at 12 months, values in the lower protein group increased (27.8 +/- 9.5 mL/minute/1.73 m2 and 54.7% +/- 48.8%), whereas those in the normal protein intake group declined significantly (3.7 +/- 3.6 mL/min-ute/1.73 m2 and 6.5% +/- 6.5%) (p less than 0.05). Both urine urea and microalbuminuria decreased significantly (p less than 0.05) in the low protein group. Unstimulated GFR at the end of 12 months was significantly less (p less than 0.05) in Group 2 (47 +/- 2 mL/minute/1.73 m2) than in Group 1 (71 +/- 21 mL/minute/1.73 m2). The rate of decline in GFR was significantly greater (p less than 0.05) in the normal protein intake group than in the low protein intake group (0.68 +/- 0.4 versus 0.28 +/- 0.15 mL/minute/1.73 m2/month).
                This study indicates that sustained dietary protein restriction can help to preserve renal function, decrease albuminuria, and lower the baseline GFR while maintaining functional renal reserve in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. To evaluate whether restricting protein intake may delay the progression of chronic renal failure caused by overt diabetic nephropathy and also whether this increases the risk of malnutrition.
                Prospective clinical trial.
                Nephrology outpatients.
                Sixty-nine patients (32 affected by type 1 and 37 by type 2 diabetes, all treated with insulin) affected by both overt diabetic nephropathy and hypertension.
                The study was started once hypertension and glycemia had been under control for at least 3 months. Two groups of patients, matched for similar mean glomerular filtration rate value and nutritional status, were studied: a low-protein diet (0.6 g/kg/d) was randomly prescribed to 35 patients, whereas in the other 34 patients a free diet intake was maintained for 12 months.
                Renal function and nutritional status.
                The protein intake was significantly different in the 2 groups of patients, whereas the average decline of glomerular filtration rate during the follow-up was comparable. In the low-protein diet group, serum prealbumin concentration significantly decreased after 9 months, whereas serum albumin decreased at the end of the study.
                Severe dietary protein restriction does not seem to delay the progression of renal disease in patients with overt diabetic nephropathy, whereas it may induce malnutrition.
                Copyright 2002 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Recent clinical investigations have demonstrated that an early restriction of dietary protein intake may reduce the rate of progression of chronic renal failure in humans. In this study the effects of a restricted-protein diet on kidney function in type I diabetic patients with clinical nephropathy were evaluated. Sixteen patients (9 men, 7 women) with mean age 37.1 +/- 9.8 yr, mean duration of diabetes 17.7 +/- 6.6 yr, proteinuria greater than 0.5 g/24 h, and serum creatinine concentration of 0.7-1.9 mg/dl were studied. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The low-protein diet (LPD) group comprised seven patients who were kept for 4.5 +/- 1 mo on a diet containing 0.71 +/- 0.12 g X kg-1 X day-1 protein. The normal-protein diet (NPD) group comprised nine patients as controls maintained for 11.7 +/- 7 mo on their usual diabetic diet containing 1.44 +/- 0.12 g X kg-1 X day-1 protein. All patients were studied every 1-2 mo. Metabolic control was assessed by evaluation of 5-8 blood glucose determinations/day and by glycosylated hemoglobin, whereas renal function was evaluated by albumin, IgG and beta 2-microglobulin urinary excretion rates, serum creatinine concentration, and creatinine clearance. At each visit, serum concentrations of total protein, albumin, phosphate, calcium, and electrolytes and weight and blood pressure were also measured. A significant reduction (434 +/- 244 to 205 +/- 212 micrograms/min, mean +/- SD) in albumin excretion rate was found in all LPD patients after dietary protein restriction, with a significant reincrease (689 +/- 201 micrograms/min) in the same patients several months after interruption of diet.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Some studies have suggested that a low-protein diet slows the deterioration of renal function in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). The effects of a low-protein diet on renal function and growth, have not been assessed in a large, prospective randomised trial in children with CRF.
                A 2-year prospective, stratified, and randomised multicentre study recruited 191 patients aged 2-18 years. After a run-in period of at least 6 months, patients were stratified into either a progressive or non-progressive category based on the change in creatinine clearance in this period. The patients were also stratified into three renal-disease categories and then randomly assigned to a control or diet group. In the diet group, the protein intake was the lowest, safe WHO recommendation--i.e., 0.8-1.1 g/kg daily adjusted for age. All patients were advised to have a calorie intake of at least 70% of the WHO recommendations. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured every 2 months by creatinine clearance; dietary compliance was checked by urinary urea-nitrogen excretion and dietary diaries (weighing method). 112 patients completed an optional third year of the study.
                The low-protein diet did not affect growth. However, there was no effect of diet on the mean decline in creatinine clearance over 2 years (diet vs control: progressive group -9.7 [SD 8.0] vs -10.7 [11.8] mL/min per 1.73 m2; non-progressive group -2.5 [7.5] vs -4.3 [10.0] mL/min per 1.73 m2). Patients classified as having progressive disease were older and had a lower creatinine clearance and a higher blood pressure at randomisation, and had a greater decrease in creatinine clearance than non-progressive patients. On multivariate regression analysis proteinuria (partial R2 = 0.259) and systolic blood pressure (partial R2 = 0.087) were independent predictors of the change in GFR. Similar results were found after the study was extended for a third year.
                A low-protein diet for 3 years did not affect the decrease in renal function in children with CRF. Proteinuria and blood pressure explain a large part of the variability of, and may be causally related to the decline in the GFR.
The results show that reducing protein intake appears to slightly slow progression to renal failure but not statistically significantly so. However, questions concerning the level of protein intake and compliance remain. Further longer-term research on large representative groups of patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus is necessary. Because of the variability amongst patients, there might perhaps be a six month therapeutic trial of protein restriction in all individuals, with continuation only in those who responded best. Trials are required of different types of protein.