Anticholinergic and sympathomimetic combination therapy of asthma. Reduction of nocturnal asthma by an inhaled anticholinergic drug. Nebulized anticholinergic and sympathomimetic treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease in the emergency room. Treatment of adult asthma: controlled double-blind clinical trial of oxitropium bromide. Combined treatment with ipratropium bromide and beta-2-adrenoceptor agonists in childhood asthma. Long-term effect of ipratropium bromide and fenoterol on the bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine in children with asthma. A comparison of bronchodilator therapy with or without inhaled corticosteroid therapy for obstructive airways disease. Dutch Chronic Non-Specific Lung Disease Study Group. Bronchodilatory effects of salbutamol, ipratropium bromide, and their combination: double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in cystic fibrosis. The effects of ipratropium bromide and fenoterol nebulizer solutions in children with asthma. Is it useful to add an anticholinergic treatment to beta 2-adrenergic medication in acute asthma attack? Short-term regular beta 2-adrenergic agonists treatment is safe in mild asthmatics taking low doses of inhaled steroids. Effect of nebulized ipratropium on the hospitalization rates of children with asthma. Addition of anticholinergic solution prolongs bronchodilator effect of beta 2 agonists in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Comparative efficacy of once-daily therapy with inhaled corticosteroid, leukotriene antagonist or sustained-release theophylline in patients with mild persistent asthma. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a combination of ipratropium and albuterol is more effective than either agent alone. An 85-day multicenter trial. COMBIVENT Inhalation Aerosol Study Group. Frequent administration by inhalation of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide in the initial management of severe acute asthma in children. Continuous and on demand use of bronchodilators in patients with non-steroid dependent asthma and chronic bronchitis: four-year follow-up randomized controlled study. A comparison of regular with intermittent bronchodilators in asthma patients on inhaled steroids. Response profiles to fluticasone and montelukast in mild-to-moderate persistent childhood asthma. Role of regular treatment with inhaled corticosteroid or leukotriene receptor antagonist in mild intermittent asthma. Aminophylline therapy does not improve outcome and increases adverse effects in children hospitalized with acute asthmatic exacerbations. Ipratropium and fenoterol in the treatment of acute asthma. Effect of three different bronchodilators during an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Effect of inhaled corticosteroids on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with mild asthma. Randomized controlled trial of ipratropium bromide and frequent low doses of salbutamol in the management of mild and moderate acute pediatric asthma.
The role of the anticholinergic drug, ipratropium bromide, in maintenance antiasthmatic therapy was evaluated in a double-blind crossover trial of three bronchodilator regimens: (1) inhaled ipratropium, placebo, and oral oxtriphylline; (2) inhaled fenoterol, placebo, and oral oxtriphylline; and (3) both inhaled ipratropium and fenoterol plus oral oxtriphylline. Twenty-two asthmatics were treated with all three regimens, each for 1 mo, allocated in random sequence. On the first and last treatment days of each month, spirometric measurements were performed before and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hr after administration of the test drugs. On the first treatment day of each month, all regimens produced significant bronchodilatation at 30 min after dose, an improvement that declined between 3 and 6 hr after dose. After continuous administration for 1 mo the two combinations employing fenoterol showed a decline in bronchodilator responsiveness from the initial treatment day, measured as the level of response (V50) or duration of response (FEV1, VC). Ipratropium plus oxtriphylline showed no such decline, suggesting the development of tolerance to long-term administration of fenoterol. Overall benefit at the end of 1 mo, measured as the area under the curves of FEV1, VC, or V50 vs time after dose, was greatest for the triple drug regimen. There were no differences in heart rate, blood pressure response, or side effects among the three treatments. It is concluded that when the anticholinergic drug ipratropium is administered concurrently with an inhaled beta 2 agonist and an oral theophylline derivative, increased bronchodilatation occurs with no detectable additional side effects. Although the mechanisms of nocturnal asthma are still uncertain, increased vagal cholinergic tone may be contributory factor. To examine this hypothesis, we have studied the effect of an anticholinergic drug, oxitropium bromide, on the early morning fall in peak expiratory flow (PEF) in patients with nocturnal asthma. Eighteen patients (aged 18 to 76 years; seven men) with documented nocturnal asthma were studied in a double-blind randomized cross-over study in which they received either oxitropium bromide (200 micrograms or 400 micrograms) or placebo in a single dose at night for two-week periods. With placebo the mean (+/- SE) fall in PEF (expressed as percentage of evening PEF) was 17.3 +/- 2.0 percent, which was significantly reduced to 10.3 +/- 3.3 percent after oxitropium (400 micrograms) (p less than 0.05; ANOVA). Closer analysis revealed that nine of the 18 patients had responded in a dose-dependent manner, with the mean percentage decreases with placebo, 200 micrograms, and 400 micrograms of oxitropium being 19.1 +/- 3.2, 11.5 +/- 4.4, and 5.0 +/- 4.5 percent, respectively (p less than 0.01 between each treatment). The remaining patients were unaffected by therapy. There were no differences between "responders" and "non-responders" in terms of age, atopic status, duration of asthma, severity of asthma, or bronchodilator response to albuterol (salbutamol). There were no differences in nocturnal symptoms between periods of treatment, and no side effects were recorded. We conclude that anticholinergic drugs may protect against nocturnal asthma in some patients, indicating the involvement of vagal cholinergic mechanisms. The effectiveness of nebulized anticholinergic and sympathomimetic regimens was evaluated in a double-blind study of 199 patients with acute airways obstruction. Patients were assigned to one of three treatment regimens according to a randomized schedule: 0.5 mg of ipratropium bromide, 1.25 mg of fenoterol hydrobromide, and 0.5 mg of ipratropium plus 1.25 mg of fenoterol. In 148 patients with acute exacerbations of asthma (mean one-second forced expiratory volume, 1.18 +/- 0.64 liters), all three regimens produced significant improvement in one-second forced expiratory volume (p less than 0.001). The greatest improvement followed treatment with the ipratropium-fenoterol combination (0.53 +/- 0.40 liters at 45 minutes; 0.57 +/- 0.51 liters at 90 minutes) and was significantly greater than that following either ipratropium alone (p less than 0.001) or fenoterol alone (p less than 0.05). In 51 patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (mean one-second forced expiratory volume, 0.67 +/- 0.29 liter), each regimen produced significant improvement in one-second forced expiratory volume at both 45 and 90 minutes (for all, p less than 0.05), but there was no significant difference among the three treatment regimens. It is concluded that, in patients with acute asthma, combination therapy with sympathomimetic and anticholinergic agents is more efficacious than either one alone. In patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, although either sympathomimetic or anticholinergic therapy provides bronchodilatation, no further benefit could be demonstrated from combination therapy. Sixteen young adult sufferers from extrinsic paroxysmal asthma with pollen hypersensitivity took part in a therapeutic trial of the synthetic anticholinergic agent oxitropium bromide administered by a metered dose inhaler. The study comprised three 3-week periods. The first, run-in period was carried out to confirm the ability of the patients to maintain a daily record of symptoms. During the second and third periods, the patient received 3 X 2 inhalations of drug or placebo in a cross-over design. The medical staff was blind to the nature of the aerosol (drug or placebo), which was given in random order. The run-in clinical score was high. Asymptomatic days were relatively infrequent and daily drug consumption was high. Functional studies between the cross-over periods showed flow-rate values close to normal, with an increase in residual volume and functional residual capacity. During treatment either with placebo or oxitropium, there was a statistically significant decrease in clinical scores. Results for oxitropium bromide treatment were significantly better than the run-in values (p less than 0.005) and the placebo period (p less than 0.02). There was no significant change in non-trial drug consumption. Functional values showed no difference in terms of flow rate, although oxitropium did cause a significant improvement in the RV/TLC ratio (p less than 0.05). No adverse reactions were reported. The effect of adding ipratropium bromide to treatment with beta-2-adrenoceptor agonists was studied in 13 asthmatic children in a double-blind cross-over trial. In the acute phase of the study inhalation of salbutamol 0.1 mg/kg followed by inhalation of 0.25 mg of ipratropium bromide was found to improve pulmonary function variables to a significantly greater extent than salbutamol followed by placebo. The combined therapy also provided significantly better protection than salbutamol plus placebo against exercise-induced asthma. Maintenance treatment with ipratropium bromide (two inhalations four times daily, 20 micrograms per inhalation) in combination with oral terbutaline and aerosolized salbutamol did not alleviate asthmatic symptoms or pulmonary function variables to a degree beyond that achieved with the beta-stimulants alone. There were no side effects associated with the ipratropium bromide treatment. These data suggest that higher doses of ipratropium bromide than are presently used should be tested for maintenance treatment of chronic asthma. We studied the effects of the anticholinergic ipratropium bromide (40 micrograms three times daily) and the beta-agonist, fenoterol (0.2 mg three times daily), both administered by powder inhaler, on bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to histamine in children, aged 7 to 15 years with mild stable asthma and limited bronchoconstriction who had a highly increased BHR. The double-blind, randomized, parallel study was conducted and performed in spring and early summer. BHR and FEV1 were measured on two occasions, before the start of treatment and monthly thereafter for 4 months. Symptoms, peak expiratory flow, and concomitant medication were registered daily. Nine of the 12 patients receiving ipratropium bromide and all eight patients receiving fenoterol completed the study. Patients completing treatment had few symptoms and were in a stable condition throughout the treatment period. Neither the administration of ipratropium bromide nor fenoterol resulted in a significant change of BHR. We concluded that long-term treatment with ipratropium bromide or fenoterol had no effect on BHR in children with mild stable asthma. The morbidity from obstructive airways disease (asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) is considerable, and the mortality rate is rising in several countries. It has been hypothesized that long-term improvement in prognosis might result from vigorous bronchodilator or antiinflammatory therapy.
                In a multicenter trial we compared three inhalation regimens in which a beta 2-agonist (terbutaline, 2000 micrograms daily) was combined with a corticosteroid (beclomethasone, 800 micrograms daily), an anticholinergic bronchodilator (ipratropium bromide, 160 micrograms daily), or placebo. Patients with airways hyperresponsiveness and obstruction who were 18 to 60 years old were followed for 2 1/2 years.
                Of the 274 patients enrolled, 56 percent had allergies. The mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 64 percent of the predicted value. The mean PC20 (the concentration of inhaled histamine causing a 20 percent decrease in FEV1, a measure of hyperresponsiveness) was 0.26 mg per milliliter. Withdrawal from the study, due mainly to pulmonary symptoms, was less frequent in the corticosteroid group (12 of 91 patients) than in the anticholinergic-drug group (45 of 92 patients) or the placebo group (44 of 91 patients; P < 0.001). The mean FEV1 (+/- SE) increased by 10.3 +/- 1.3 percent of the predicted value in the corticosteroid group within three months and remained stable thereafter, whereas it did not change in the other two groups (P < 0.001). The PC20 increased by 2.0 doubling concentrations in the corticosteroid group but did not change in the other groups (P < 0.001). In the corticosteroid group, patients who did not smoke, who had allergies, or who were less than 40 years old benefited more from their treatment than did those who smoked, did not have allergies, or were over 40, but all subgroups of the corticosteroid group had improvement as compared with the anticholinergic-drug or placebo group.
                The addition of an inhaled corticosteroid--but not an inhaled anticholinergic agent--to maintenance treatment with a beta 2-agonist (terbutaline) substantially reduced morbidity, hyperresponsiveness, and airways obstruction in patients with a spectrum of obstructive airways disease. The efficacy of inhaled sympathomimetic and anticholinergic agents on airway obstruction in cystic fibrosis (CF) has been proven in several studies. However, studies comparing combined therapy with monotherapy led to divergent results, probably due to different study designs, different dosages, and the small numbers of patients investigated. Therefore, we wanted to answer the question which inhalation has the best short term effect: a sympathomimetic or an anticholinergic agent, or the combination of both. We investigated 17 patients with CF on 4 successive days in the morning, using pulmonary function testing before and 30 min after inhalation. Each patient received aerosolized salbutamol (SB, maximum dose (max.) 2.5 mg), ipratropium bromide (IB, max. 0.5 mg), the combination of both, or placebo (normal saline) in a randomized, double-blind crossover design. The mean forced expiratory volume in the first second improved significantly (adjusted P-value < 0.017) after each treatment compared to placebo. Analysis of variance showed that SB and combination therapy with SB and IB were superior to IB alone, without significant difference between SB and combination therapy. Response of a patient to combined therapy was usually associated with response to SB. Long-term efficacy and side effects of treatment with bronchodilators still remain to be investigated after this short term study. We conclude that in CF patients bronchodilator therapy with sympathomimetic agents is usually sufficient. Only in cases with proven additional benefit from inhalation by anticholinergics should combination therapy be recommended. The effects of nebulized solutions of ipratropium bromide and fenoterol combined were compared with the response to either preparation alone in single dose and longer-term administration in children who had asthma. The combination produced a slightly greater response than either alone, especially in peak expiratory flow. Over a 1-month period, there were no significant differences in symptom scores or lung function parameters between the combination of ipratropium bromide and fenoterol and fenoterol alone in a group of children who had asthma. It is possible that the addition of ipratropium bromide to a sympathomimetic drug may be useful in a subgroup of asthmatics, particularly if there is a considerable large airway contribution to bronchial narrowing. The aim of our study was to determine whether the combination of an anticholinergic treatment with a beta 2-adrenergic medication is a more effective treatment for acute asthma attack than the two treatments individually. The association of salbutamol-ipratropium was compared to treatment with salbutamol and ipratropium alone. It was a prospective double-blind study in children with acute asthma attack, participating as outpatients. Their clinical history and characteristics of bronchial obstruction were recorded on a standard form. Afterwards, they were included in one of the three following study groups: group one, 100 micrograms/inh salbutamol; group two, 20 micrograms/inh ipratropium; group three, 100 micrograms/inh of salbutamol plus 20 micrograms/inh ipratropium. There were 40 patients in each group, with Tal score +/- 5 and PEF < 80% of the predicted value. They were evaluated at the beginning (0 min), and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 80, 100 and 120 min. Each patient was treated with two inhalations of the study medication and was then evaluated for variations in Tal score. The mean age was 7.3 years; Tal score was 5.6, 5.6 and 6.0 at 0 min (p > 0.05). Decrease in Tal score after 15 min meant p < 0.01 for salbutamol-ipratropium and salbutamol vs. ipratropium. At 30 min p < 0.05 for salbutamol-ipratropium vs. salbutamol, and at 45 min p < 0.01 for salbutamol-ipratropium vs. salbutamol. PEF at 0 min was 70.9%, 71.3% and 68.6% (p > 0.05) increasing after 15 min. At 30 min p < 0.05 for salbutamol-ipratropium vs. salbutamol, and p < 0.01 vs. ipratropium. At 45 min p < 0.01 for salbutamol-ipratropium vs. salbutamol and ipratropium. A total 4.7 doses of salbutamol were needed to improve the asthma attack, 5.3 of ipratropium and 3.7 of salbutamol-ipratropium, with p < 0.01 for salbutamol-ipratropium vs. salbutamol and ipratropium. We conclude that the combination of salbutamol and ipratropium is more effective than each medication alone in treating acute asthma attacks in pediatric patients. Regular treatment with beta 2-adrenergic agonists is controversial in bronchial asthma. To investigate whether beta 2-adrenergic agonists can be used safely if associated with low doses of inhaled steroids, for a short period, without a deterioration of asthma control, we have examined 24 mild asthmatics. In a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 1 week of run-in and run-out period framed 3 weeks of treatment. All patients received inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP 250 micrograms t.i.d.); after 1 week, 12 patients inhaled 400 micrograms of broxaterol and 12 patients received placebo t.i.d. FVC, FEV1, PD20-FEV1 methacholine, morning and evening PEF, and PEF amplitude % mean were measured before, during, and after treatment. No significant changes were noted in patients receiving inhaled broxaterol. There were no differences in symptoms and the use of rescue medication (salbutamol spray). We conclude that short-term regular treatment with beta 2-adrenergic agonists is not associated with a deterioration in asthma control in mild asthmatics inhaling low doses of steroids. Anticholinergic medications such as ipratropium improve the pulmonary function of patients with acute exacerbations of asthma, but their effect on hospitalization rates is uncertain.
                We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 434 children (2 to 18 years old) who had acute exacerbations of moderate or severe asthma treated in the emergency department. All the children received a nebulized solution of albuterol (2.5 or 5 mg per dose, depending on body weight) every 20 minutes for three doses and then as needed. A corticosteroid (2 mg of prednisone or prednisolone per kilogram of body weight) was given orally with the second dose of albuterol. Children in the treatment group received 500 microg (2.5 ml) of ipratropium bromide with the second and third doses of albuterol; children in the control group received 2.5 ml of normal saline at these times.
                Overall, the rate of hospitalization was lower in the ipratropium group (59 of 215 children [27.4 percent]) than in the control group (80 of 219 [36.5 percent], P=0.05). For patients with moderate asthma (indicated by a peak expiratory flow rate of 50 to 70 percent of the predicted value or an asthma score of 8 to 11 on a 15-point scale), hospitalization rates were similar in the two groups (ipratropium: 8 of 79 children [10.1 percent]; control: 9 of 84 [10.7 percent]). For patients with severe asthma (defined as a peak expiratory flow rate of <50 percent of the predicted value or an asthma score of 12 to 15), the addition of ipratropium significantly reduced the need for hospitalization (51 of 136 children [37.5 percent], as compared with 71 of 135 [52.6 percent] in the control group; P=0.02).
                Among children with a severe exacerbation of asthma, the addition of ipratropium bromide to albuterol and corticosteroid therapy significantly decreases the hospitalization rate. A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial was designed to assess the safety, efficacy, and duration of the bronchodilation resulting from the addition of 500 micrograms of ipratropium bromide (Atrovent; Boehringer Ingelheim, CT) inhalation solution to standard small volume nebulizer treatments with 2.5 mg albuterol inhalation solution. A total of 195 patients (63% men, average age 64 years) with > 10 pack-year smoking histories and stable, moderate-to- severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] 1.02 liter, 38.8% predicted) from eight university-affiliated chest clinics in seven U.S. cities were enrolled into the study. Asthma, rhinitis, and eosinophilia were exclusions, as was daily use of > 10 mg of prednisone (or 20 mg on alternate days). There was a 2-week stabilization period during which the patients were instructed in the use of the small volume nebulizers, which they used three times daily with albuterol alone. They were asked to keep daily logs of peak flow rates, pulmonary symptoms, and additional medication usage. On their test day 1 the subjects came to the pulmonary function laboratory having been off theophylline for 24 hours and beta 2-agonists for 12 hours and performed a baseline spirometry. They then received their morning small volume nebulizer treatment of albuterol to which was added either 500 micrograms if ipratropium bromide or a saline placebo. Spirometry was repeated at 15, 30, and 60 minutes, and then hourly for 8 hours. Subjects then took home a 2-week supply of albuterol and test drug for thrice daily use in their small volume nebulizer. They were evaluated for pulmonary symptoms and adverse effects every 14 days. The 8-hour spirometry was repeated on test day 43 and finally on test day 85. Primary data evaluated were the peak increase in FEV1 and the area between the FEV1 baseline value and the 8-hour FEV1 curve. Similar calculations were made for forced vital capacity (FVC) and 25-75% forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75%). On test day 1 the peak increase in FEV1 for the ipratropium bromide + albuterol subjects was 26% greater than those on placebo + albuterol (p < 0.003). The area under the 8-hour FEV1 curve was 64% greater in those given ipratropium bromide on test day 1 (p < 0.0002). Similar increases were seen in FVC and FEF25-75%. The peak improvements in FEV1 and FVC with the addition of ipratropium bromide to albuterol were maintained on test days 43 and 85. Considering the safety and efficacy profiles of this combination, the data would suggest that ipratropium bromide inhalation solution should be considered first-line therapy for those patients with COPD requiring small volume nebulizer treatments. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the inhaled budesonide, sustained-release theophylline and montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in patients with mild persistent asthma. In this single-center, randomized, parallel-group study that not designed blindly and placebo-controlled manner, 74 patients with mild persistent asthma were treated with either inhaled budesonide 400 microg once daily, oral montelukast 10 mg once daily, or sustained-release theophylline 400 mg once daily for 3 months. In all three treatment groups, improvements were attained in overall asthma control. Asthma symptom scores and supplemental beta2-agonist use were quite the same in all three treatment groups (P>0.05). Although inhaled budesonide group resulted in significantly greater improvements compared with the other two groups in the lung functions (P<0.05), the changes in FEV1 and PEF are within the baseline variability and there was no statistically significant difference among the groups when analyzed by treatment month (P>0.05). Exacerbations of asthma were experienced by 16% of the patients in the montekulast group, by 12.5% of the patients in the theophylline group, and by none of the patients in the budesonide group. The adverse event in each of the three groups was 12%, 16% and 16.7%, respectively. It is concluded that the most important clinical parameters do not point that one of the treatments is more effective than others. Treatment with inhaled corticosteroid is preferred, but sustained-release theophylline and leukotriene antagonists are alternative controller medications in mild persistent asthma. Combination bronchodilator therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is available widely throughout the world except in North America. Previous studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the advantages of combining anticholinergic therapy with sympathomimetic therapy in COPD. We report the results of a 12-week prospective, double-blind, parallel-group evaluation of the use of the following: albuterol, a beta-adrenergic agent; ipratropium, an anticholinergic agent; or a combination of the two, administered by metered-dose inhaler to patients with moderately severe stable COPD. Following baseline studies, 534 patients were given one of the three test bronchodilator preparations to be used at home four times daily in addition to oral theophylline and corticosteroids as required. The doses of the latter two drugs were kept stable. Subjects were tested on days 1, 29, 57, and 85. Analysis of 1-s forced expiratory volume (FEV1) curves on those test days indicated that the combination was superior to either single agent alone in peak effect, in the effect during the first 4 h after dosing, and in the total area under the curve of the FEV1 response. The mean peak percent increases in FEV1 over baseline on the four test days were 31 to 33 percent for the combination, 24 to 25 percent for ipratropium, and 24 to 27 percent for albuterol. The differences between the combination and its components were statistically significant on all test days. The AUC0-4 means for the combination were 21 to 44 percent greater than the ipratropium means and 30 to 46 percent greater than the albuterol means. Similar changes were noted in the forced vital capacity curves. Symptom scores did not change over time and did not differ among the treatment groups. We conclude that the combination of ipratropium and albuterol, when given by metered-dose inhaler to patients with COPD, is more effective than either of the two agents alone. The advantage of the combination is apparent primarily during the first 4 h after administration. The availability of combination therapy by metered-dose inhaler should help to improve patient compliance. A study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of two therapeutic regimens for the treatment of children presenting to the emergency department with acute asthma. A regimen of inhaled salbutamol alone was compared to inhaled salbutamol combined with ipratropium bromide. Twenty-five children ranging in age from 5 to 15 years were enrolled in the study. Children with FEV1 less than or equal to 55% predicted were eligible to participate in the study. Subjects were randomized in a double-blind fashion into one of two treatment groups. Both groups received an initial dose of salbutamol by nebulizer of 150 micrograms/kg (0.03 cc/kg), followed by six consecutive doses of 50 micrograms/kg (0.01 cc/kg) at 20-minute intervals. In one group of subjects, 250 micrograms (1.0 ml) of ipratropium bromide respirator solution was added to the salbutamol administered at the time of the initial inhalation, and at 40 and 80 minutes, whereas the remaining subjects received a placebo with salbutamol at those times. Formal one-way statistical ANOVA with change in percent predicted FEV1 as a response variable confirmed there was a statistically significant difference at all time points caused by drug regimen during the 150-minute observation period. There was no significant difference in side effects reported in the two groups. Significant additional bronchodilation achieved with salbutamol and ipratropium bromide together indicates that there is likely a substantial cholinergic element to the bronchospasm observed in acute exacerbations of asthma in the pediatric age group. A previous two-year study of continuous and on demand bronchodilator therapy in patients with moderate asthma and chronic bronchitis showed a deterioration in lung function in those on continuous therapy.
                A two-year follow-up study was undertaken of patients who had been shown in the previous study to have non-steroid dependent (mild) asthma and chronic bronchitis, in order to investigate the effect of continuous and on-demand treatment with bronchodilator therapy.
                Patients for the study were drawn from 29 general practices in the catchment area of the University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands. A total of 83 patients (27 with asthma and 56 with chronic bronchitis) were selected from a group of 160 patients who had completed the previous two-year bronchodilator trial. During these first two years the selected subjects had been shown to be non-steroid dependent (no rapid decline in lung function and a low number of exacerbations of their condition per year), and they were followed up for another two years of treatment with bronchodilator therapy. At the start of the four-year study, patients were randomly assigned to one of two parallel treatment groups: continuous treatment (dry powder inhalations of either salbutamol 1600 micrograms or ipratropium bromide 160 micrograms daily) or treatment on demand (only during exacerbations or periods of dyspnoea). Outcome parameters were the annual decline in lung function, changes in peak flow rate, bronchial hyper-responsiveness, exacerbation rate, respiratory symptoms and reported health.
                After correction for possibly confounding variables and for regression to the mean, the decline in lung function was 49 ml year in patients taking bronchodilators continuously and 51 ml year in patients using bronchodilators on demand, irrespective of the drug use. Continuously treated patients, whether suffering from asthma or chronic bronchitis, did not differ from patients treated on demand with respect to mean morning peak flow rate, diurnal (and week to week) variation of the peak flow rate, bronchial hyper-responsiveness, exacerbation rate and reported health. There was no difference between the long-term effects of salbutamol and ipratropium.
                Continuous use of bronchodilators over four years in patients with non-steroid dependent asthma or chronic bronchitis does not increase the decline in lung function which had been observed previously in patients with moderate asthma or chronic bronchitis during two years of continuous treatment with bronchodilators. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of regular versus intermittent (p.r.n.) bronchodilators on bronchial reactivity and asthma control in patients on concomitant inhaled corticosteroids. We studied 12 patients with asthma in a prospective, randomised, single-blind, single-dummy, three-period crossover trial comparing placebo (2 puffs t.d.s.), salbutamol (200 micrograms t.d.s.) and oxitropium bromide (200 micrograms t.d.s.) for 28 days each. Computerised spirometry and bronchial reactivity to histamine were obtained on entry and after each treatment period. Symptom scores, use of rescue bronchodilator and peak expiratory flow rates were recorded daily. There were no significant differences in bronchial hyperreactivity between the salbutamol, oxitropium and placebo treatment periods. There were no significant differences in baseline FEV1, FEF25-75%, symptom scores, use of rescue bronchodilator or morning and evening PEFR between treatment periods. Intermittent beta agonist therapy is as effective as regular therapy in terms of asthma control and bronchial hyperreactivity in patients on concomitant inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Since intermittent therapy achieves similar results with significantly lower beta agonist consumption, the data support current recommendations that beta agonists should be taken on a p.r.n. basis in asthma patients on inhaled steroids. Outcome data are needed to base recommendations for controller asthma medication use in school-aged children.
                We sought to determine intraindividual and interindividual response profiles and predictors of response to an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA).
                An ICS, fluticasone propionate (100 mug twice daily), and an LTRA, montelukast (5-10 mg nightly, age dependent), were administered to children ages 6 to 17 years with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma using only as-needed bronchodilators in a multicenter, double-masked, 2-sequence, 16-week crossover trial. Clinical, pulmonary, and inflammatory responses to these controllers were evaluated.
                Improvements in most clinical asthma control measures occurred with both controllers. However, clinical outcomes (asthma control days [ACDs], the validated Asthma Control Questionnaire, and albuterol use), pulmonary responses (FEV(1)/forced vital capacity, peak expiratory flow variability, morning peak expiratory flow, and measures of impedance), and inflammatory biomarkers (exhaled nitric oxide [eNO]) improved significantly more with fluticasone than with montelukast treatment. eNO was both a predictor of ACDs (P = .011) and a response indicator (P = .003) in discriminating the difference in ACD response between fluticasone and montelukast.
                The more favorable clinical, pulmonary, and inflammatory responses to an ICS than to an LTRA provide pediatric-based group evidence to support ICSs as the preferred first-line therapy for mild-to-moderate persistent asthma in children. eNO, as a predictor of response, might help to identify individual children not receiving controller medication who achieve a greater improvement in ACDs with an ICS compared with an LTRA. Current guidelines for asthma treatment do not recommend daily maintenance therapy in patients with mild intermittent (step 1) asthma. However, because there is increasing evidence that airway inflammation is present even in this patient group, maintenance anti-inflammatory therapy may be considered. We investigated the clinical impact of regular treatment with the inhaled corticosteroid beclomethasone dipropionate and the leukotriene receptor antagonist pranlukast in the patients concerned. The study was a randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial. Eighty-five symptomatic patients with newly diagnosed mild intermittent asthma having normal pulmonary function were assigned beclomethasone or pranlukast for 8 weeks. Then, these medications were stopped for the next 16 weeks. Main outcome measures were asthma symptoms, pulmonary function, and airway inflammation. Treatment with beclomethasone and pranlukast significantly increased forced expiratory volume in 1 second and peak expiratory flow from baseline and decreased asthma symptom scores and sputum eosinophil counts and eosinophil cationic protein contents. After discontinuation of the treatment, symptom scores remained unchanged, but pulmonary function and airway inflammation were aggravated and then returned to the baseline levels. Therefore, maintenance therapy with inhaled corticosteroid or leukotriene receptor antagonist can provide further improvements in asthma symptoms, pulmonary function, and airway inflammation, and discontinuation of the therapy causes worsening of asthma, indicating that stopping or interrupting anti-inflammatory therapy may not be advisable in patients with symptomatic mild intermittent asthma. To evaluate the effects of aminophylline (Am) in children hospitalized with asthma.
                Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects were children between the ages of 5 and 18 years admitted for asthma exacerbation to either a tertiary care children's hospital or an inner-city general hospital in New York. Exclusion criteria were admission to the intensive care unit, initial theophylline level > 5 micrograms/dL, or the presence of other systemic disorders. All patients received nebulized albuterol therapy and intravenous glucocorticosteroids in standardized doses. Thirty-one patients were randomized to receive either an Am bolus followed by continuous Am infusion or placebo (P) bolus and infusion. The outcome variables were: duration of hospitalization, percent of predicted peak expiratory flow rates recorded at 12-hour intervals, number of albuterol treatments required, and adverse effects.
                There were no significant differences at study entry in age, sex, race, number of previous hospital admissions, prior medications used, clinical symptom scores, or initial peak flow rates for the two groups. For 26 patients who completed this study, 15 patients in the P group were hospitalized for a mean duration of 2.33 +/- 1.3 days, whereas 11 patients in the Am group required 2.58 +/- 1.5 days. There were no significant differences between the two groups for hospital days, peak flow rates at any time interval, or amount of albuterol therapy required (P > .2). In the Am group, 6 of the 14 patients who entered the study experienced significant adverse effects consisting of nausea, emesis, headache, abdominal pain, and palpitations. Only 1 of 17 patients in the P group had an adverse effect (P < .05).
                There is no benefit and considerable risk of adverse effects associated with the use of Am in hospitalized asthmatic children. A double-blind, randomized trial was carried out in 48 children to assess the effects of inhaled ipratropium bromide, fenoterol or a combination of both drugs in treating their moderately severe acute asthma. Doses were adjusted according to the age of the patients and administered by nebulizer. Measurements of pulse rate and respiratory rate and assessment of the severity of symptoms were made at fixed intervals during the first 2 hours on treatment. Repeat nebulizations were given, if necessary, at 2-hourly intervals. The results suggested that fenoterol provided the most adequate treatment and there was no evidence to indicate that the addition of ipratropium produced any improved benefit. This study evaluates the effect of three different bronchodilators (beta 2-adrenergic, anticholinergic and methylxanthine) alone and in randomized sequence, during an exacerbation in thirteen patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Dose-response curves were obtained for inhaled salbutamol and inhaled ipratropium bromide. The bronchodilator effect of a perfusion of aminophylline was also assessed. When a plateau of bronchodilatation was achieved with one agent, one dose of a second bronchodilator was administered to see whether additional bronchodilation could be achieved. The increments in FEV1 and FVC were similar with the three agents. The addition of a second bronchodilator did not result in significant increments in most of the patients. In at least half of the patients the doses of salbutamol and ipratropium that produced the maximal bronchodilatation were twice that currently employed. We studied the effect of inhaled budesonide on bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in twenty mild asthmatic patients. The study was conducted as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Before entering the study, the patients performed methacholine inhalation challenge (MIC) using a reservoir method to assess BHR. Then, they were randomly allocated to receive budesonide turbuhaler (200 micrograms/dose) or placebo turbuhaler two inhalations, twice daily for eight weeks. During the study, each patient recorded daily asthma score and daily number of puffs of beta 2 agonist and they were assessed at weeks 4 and 8. At the end of the treatment, MIC was repeated again. Patients receiving budesonide showed a significant improvement in airway responsiveness compared with those receiving placebo (p < 0.05). They also showed a significant improvement in asthma severity score and a significant decrease in beta 2 agonist bronchodilator use. This study also suggested that inhaled corticosteroids may be the primary treatment in patients, even with mild asthmatic and well-controlled symptoms. To compare the effectiveness and safety of alternative nebulized drug protocols in children with mild or moderate asthma exacerbations.
                We conducted a blinded, randomized, controlled trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design. Two interventions, nebulized salbutamol in frequent low doses (0.075 mg/kg every 30 minutes) and the addition of ipratropium bromide (250 micrograms), were compared with salbutamol in hourly high doses (0.15 mg/kg every 60 minutes) in children with mild or moderate acute asthma. The primary end point was the improvement in respiratory resistance. Secondary end points included oxygen saturation, corticosteroid use, patient disposition, and relapse status.
                A total of 298 participants aged 3 to 17 years were studied, and 15% were admitted to the hospital; 14% of the children had relapses. No increased bronchodilation was associated with frequent low doses versus hourly high doses of salbutamol (RR = 0.9 [95% confidence interval 0.7, 1.3]) or the addition of ipratropium bromide versus placebo (RR = 1.0 [0.8, 1.3]). No group differences were observed in secondary end points. Salbutamol in frequent low doses was associated with increased vomiting (RR = 2.5 [1.1, 6.0]).
                Our results do not support the use of frequent low doses of nebulized salbutamol or the addition of ipratropium bromide compared with hourly high doses of salbutamol in children with mild or moderate asthma.
Overall this review provides no justification for routinely introducing anticholinergics as part of add-on treatment for patients whose asthma is not well controlled on standard therapies. This does not exclude the possibility that there may be a sub-group of patients who derive some benefit and a trial of treatment in individual patients may still be justified. The role of long term anticholinergics such as tiotropium bromide has yet to be established in patients with asthma and any future trials might draw on the messages derived from this review.