Prophylactic antibiotics in vascular surgery. Topical, systemic, or both? Antibiotic prophylaxis in vascular reconstructive surgery: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Single-dose v. short-term antibiotic therapy for prevention of wound infection in general surgery. A prospective, randomized double-blind trial. [Antibioprevention in reconstructive arterial surgery. A double-blind study]. Prophylactic antibiotics as an adjunct for skin grafting in clean reconstructive surgery following burn injury. Prophylactic antibiotics in surgery for chronic ear disease. Prophylactic vancomycin versus placebo in arterial prosthetic reconstructions. The role of prophylactic antibiotics in middle ear surgery. A study on phenoxymethylpenicillin prophylaxis. Single-dose peroperative antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal surgery. Prophylactic antibiotics in Caesarean section: effect of a short preoperative course of benzyl penicillin or clindamycin plus gentamicin on postoperative infectious morbidity. Effects of prophylactic antibiotics in vascular surgery. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Comparison of prophylactic ampicillin/sulbactam with gentamicin and metronidazole in elective colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical study. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in ear surgery. Oral prophylaxis with neomycin and erythromycin in colorectal surgery. More proof for efficacy than failure. Randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotic therapy after preterm amnion rupture. Single-dose intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in emergency abdominal surgery. Antibiotics in elective colon surgery. A randomized trial of oral, systemic, and oral/systemic antibiotics for prophylaxis. Prophylactic antibiotics in neonates with umbilical artery catheter placement: a prospective study of 137 patients. Comparison of one dose versus three doses of prophylactic antibiotics, and the influence of blood transfusion, on infectious complications in acute and elective colorectal surgery. Comparison of two prophylactic single-dose intravenous antibiotic regimes in the treatment of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in a district general hospital. Failure of topically applied antibiotics, added to systemic prophylaxis, to reduce perineal wound infection in abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Prevention of synthetic arterial graft infections by improved hygienic routine and dicloxacillin administration. Use of antibiotic prophylaxis in ear surgery. Topical ampicillin in addition to a systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. A prospective randomized study. The role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Reduction of leg wound infections following coronary artery bypass surgery. Single-dose parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal surgery. Oral ciprofloxacin versus intravenous cefuroxime as prophylaxis against postoperative infection in vascular surgery: a randomised double-blind, prospective multicentre study. No effect of topical ampicillin prophylaxis in elective operations of the colon or rectum. A double-blind randomized controlled trial on the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing elective caesarean section. Oral versus systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colon surgery: a randomized study and meta-analysis send a message from the 1990s. Ceftriaxone vs. ampicillin + metronidazole as prophylaxis against infections after clean-contaminated abdominal surgery. [Antibiotic prophylaxis in a priori cesarean sections without a high risk of infection. Experiences of a Tunisian maternity department]. Value of oral antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.
A prospective, randomized, blinded study was performed to determine whether prophylactic antibiotics would reduce the incidence of infection in peripheral vascular surgery and whether the route of antibiotic administration was important. Patients undergoing a vascular procedure with a groin incision were allocated to one of four groups with respect to prophylactic antibiotics. Group I received no antibiotic. Group II had topical cephradine instilled in their incisions prior to closure. Group III received a 24-hour perioperative course of intravenous cephradine, and Group IV received both topical and intravenous cephradine. Groin and abdominal incisional infections were significantly reduced (p < 0.01) among patients who received prophylactic antibiotics by either the topical, systemic, or combined routes of administration. No significant differences were noted among the three antibiotic groups. Profundoplasty, femoral embolectomy, and femoral aneurysm repair were each associated with an increased incidence of infection (p < 0.01). Other risk factors were only important in patients not receiving antibiotics. Either intraoperative topical antibiotics or perioperative systemic antibiotics prevent infection in peripheral vascular surgery, but antibiotic administration by both routes is unnecessary. In a prospective randomized double-blind study of 141 patients referred for reconstructive vascular surgery on the abdominal aorta and the lower extremities, placebo was compared to antibiotic prophylaxis. The prophylaxis group received three doses of a combination of methicillin, 2 g and netilmicin, 200 mg. Antibiotic prophylaxis reduced postoperative wound infections as compared to placebo, i.e. 4/69 (5.8%) vs. 12/72, (16.7%) respectively (P = 0.04). No graft infections occurred. Two cases of postoperative septicaemia were seen in the placebo group, none in the antibiotic group. Among different procedures aortic-femoral bypass operations showed the highest wound infection rates. The two treatment groups were comparable with regard to all other postoperative complications registered, including nephro- and ototoxicity. The antibiotic regimen was considered safe, but had only marginal value as prophylaxis in vascular reconstructive surgery on the abdominal aorta and the lower extremities. To investigate the effectiveness of a single-dose antibiotic regimen for preventing postoperative wound infection, a prospective, randomized double-blind trial was carried out in patients undergoing "clean-contaminated", "contaminated" or "clean" (vascular) surgery. Both elective and emergency operations were included. Single-dose (preoperative) prophylaxis was compared with short-term prophylaxis (1 dose preoperatively and 2 doses postoperatively). The antibiotics were penicillin, tobramycin and metronidazole in various combinations, and comparisons between single-dose and short-term prophylaxis were made with all the regimens. The incidence of wound infection was 5/277 (1.8%) in the short-term group and 9/287 (3.1%) in the single-dose group. The difference was not statistically significant. Nor was statistically significant difference found when the type of operation and the degree of contamination were considered. Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis thus gave a low incidence of postoperative wound infection, even in "clean-contaminated" or "contaminated" cases. Routine antibiotic prophylaxis in reconstructive vascular surgery was established on a small number of controlled trials. A comparative double-blind study of cefazolin versus placebo was conducted in 179 patients who underwent reconstructive vascular surgery over a 23 month period. The surgical procedures were divided in three groups: aorto-iliac reconstructions (112 cases) infra-inguinal reconstructions (50 cases), extra anatomic by-passes (17 cases). The arterial diseases encountered and the systemic and local conditions in favour of infection were equal in the 2 randomized groups. Among the 93 patients who received cephazolin, 13 (13.97%) developed an infection which was systemic in 1 case and local in 12 cases; 1 amputation and 1 death were observed in this group. In the placebo group 26 patients among 86 (30.23%) developed an infection, systemic in 4 cases and local in 22 cases with 1 death and 1 amputation. Statistical analysis (chi-square test) showed a significant difference in favour of the active substance. A short time massive dose of antibiotic administered in the perioperative period is the best method to reduce the incidence of infection in this type of surgery. A randomized prospective double-blind trial was conducted to determine the effectiveness of cephalothin vs. placebo given perioperatively for prevention of infections associated with operations using skin grafts for clean reconstructive surgery following burn injury. The antibiotic was effective in reducing infection (0.8% vs. 5.7%, p less than 0.03), reducing graft loss (p less than 0.2), and shortening hospital stay (12.38 days vs. 13.66 days, p = 0.02). Factors not associated with greater graft infection included the operating surgeon, the use or nonuse of a tie-on stent, graft thickness, large size of graft, and patient age. The role of prophylactic antibiotics in otologic surgery continues to be debated and perhaps misused. Prior studies have provided conflicting evidence with regard to the benefit obtained from the use of prophylactic antibiotics in surgery for chronic otitis media. The current study was designed to evaluate the role of prophylactic antibiotics in the outcomes of surgery for chronic ear disease. It was the authors' impression that there was no indication for prophylactic antibiotics in such surgery.
                Randomized prospective study performed in a tertiary care facility.
                Patients who met inclusion criteria (n = 146) were randomly assigned to an antibiotic treatment group or a control group receiving no prophylactic antibiotics. Patients in the antibiotic treatment group were given preoperative intravenous antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics for 5 days after surgery. Patients were followed postoperatively and observed for clinical evidence of infection and graft failure.
                There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to the incidence of postoperative infection or graft survival.
                The use of prophylactic antibiotics in surgery for chronic ear disease cannot be recommended based on the findings of this study. Vascular reconstructive surgery with the placement of prosthetic material caudal to the diaphragm is occasionally associated with postoperative wound infection. These infections often lead to amputation and can be lethal. Only a few published reports contain information on the value of prophylactic antibiotic treatment with these operations, but its use is common throughout the world. To investigate this problem, a prospective, double blind, randomized study of vancomycin versus placebo in 128 vascular graft operations caudal to the diaphragm was conducted from June, 1982 to July, 1984. The difference in infection rate was significant (2 p = 0.0008) in favor of the vancomycin group. Fourteen wound infections (21.2%) were found in the placebo group, 3 of which (4.5%) were prosthesis infections. Among the 62 vancomycin-treated patients, one case of superficial wound infection (1.6%) and no cases of prosthesis infection were found. The most common pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus. The study has demonstrated that vancomycin, a narrow spectrum antibiotic, in an ultra-short regimen (one gram one hour before surgery and one gram 4 hours later) is an effective prophylactic agent against postoperative wound infection. Temporary and, in most cases, doses-related side effects were seen in 7.9% of the patients treated with vancomycin. A randomized prospective double-blind study was performed testing the value of phenoxymethylpenicillin in conjunction with middle ear surgery. The patients were evaluated for clinical signs of infection and with bacteriologic cultures both pre- and postoperatively. No difference in clinical signs of infection was noted between the pre- and postoperative evaluations. A significantly larger number of patients, however, presented with postoperative positive bacteriologic cultures as compared with the preoperative cultures. This increase was particularly evident in the placebo group. The two microorganisms that were found in increased numbers postoperatively were Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas strains. The value of prophylactic antibiotic treatment and phenoxymethylpenicillin treatment in particular is discussed. A single intravenous dose of tobramycin and lincomycin, given at the start of gastrointestinal operations, significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative wound infection from 34% to 5%. The occurrence of both anaerobic and aerobic bacteria was reduced. Therapeutic concentrations of the antibiotics were maintained throughout the operative period in most cases. No toxic effects of the antibiotics were detected, no anaesthetic complication occurred, and resistant strains of bacteria normally sensitive to the antibiotics were not isolated from wounds. The efficacy of a narrow-spectrum (benzyl penicillin) versus broad-spectrum (clindamycin + gentamicin) preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis was studied in a series of 147 consecutive patients undergoing Caesarean section at the State Maternity Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. Both regimens proved effective in reducing postoperative endometritis: from 33% (19/57 cases) to 6.5% (3/46 cases) in the penicillin treated group, and to 9.5% (4/42 cases) in the clindamycin + gentamicin treated group. The reduction in the incidence of endometritis was not reflected in the duration of hospital stay, which was 7.7 days in the untreated group, 7.8 days in the penicillin treated group, and 7.6 days in the clindamycin + gentamicin treated group. No significant differences between the groups were detected in the incidence of wound infections. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study the effects on infection rates of a 1-day and a 3-day course of cefuroxime versus placebo were studied in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery. During a 30-month study period 211 patients were randomized to one of three treatment groups: Group I Placebo; Group II cefuroxime 1 day; Group III cefuroxime 3 days. Cefuroxime was administered intravenously (1.5 g every 8 hours) and the first dose was given 1 hour before surgery. Wound infection rates in the three treatment groups were: Group I 16.7%; Group II 3.8% (p less than 0.05 vs placebo); Group III 4.3% (p less than 0.05 vs placebo). One graft infection occurred in 110 patients at risk (0.9%) and this occurred in the placebo group. No allergic reactions or other side effects were noted in any of the treatment groups. No cefuroxime-resistant bacteria were found in Group II or III. In conclusion, prophylactic administration of cefuroxime during 1 day significantly reduced the incidence of infectious complications following peripheral vascular surgery. Extension of the prophylaxis beyond the day of surgery offered no additional effect. The study supports the use of short-term prophylactic antibiotics in vascular surgery. A randomized control clinical study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of prophylactic ampicillin/sulbactam in preventing wound infection after elective colorectal surgery with a combination of gentamicin and metronidazole. Over a 2-year period, 143 patients were recruited, but 15 patients were subsequently excluded due to the use of additional antibiotics for the treatment of pulmonary or urinary infection or early postoperative death without wound infection. Of the 128 evaluable patients, six of the 63 patients (9.5%) in the ampicillin/sulbactam group and seven of the 65 patients (10.7%) in the gentamicin and metronidazole group developed wound infection. We conclude that prophylactic ampicillin/sulbactam is effective in reducing the risk of wound infection following colorectal surgery. The purpose of this research was to assess the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic administration in ear surgery over a wide range of cases. Additional objectives include the assessment of the relative effect of patient age, duration of operation, preoperative condition, and the success of tympanoplasty. Prospectively, in a controlled study, 4,000 patients were studied employing cephalosporin and oxacillin as prophylactic antimicrobials. No statistically significant difference in postoperative otologic infection rates was observed. This conclusion was unaltered by the operative duration, patient age, or preoperative condition. Grafting success was not improved. In an open, prospective, and randomized investigation on the prophylactic efficacy of peroral neomycin sulfate-erythromycin base vs intravenous ceftriaxone-metronidazole preparation in colorectal surgery, no significantly diverging results between regimens were recorded (1/27 [3.7%] and 2/27 [7.4%] wound infections, respectively). Commentary is made about the diverging results from earlier studies on antimicrobial prophylaxis and on the multifactorial causality of surgical infection. We believe that variables such as physical condition of the patients, virulence and local resistance patterns of bacteria, and technical skill of the surgeons are far more important in regard to the postoperative outcome concerning septic complications than is the choice of proper antibiotics. Thus, to determine the efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis, we call for larger investigations in the future, preferably double-blind, where it is possible to better control and diminish the influence of determinants other than the antibiotics being compared. Our purpose was to determine whether maternal administration of prophylactic ampicillin or erythromycin after preterm amnion rupture is associated with maternal or neonatal benefits.
                Women with singleton pregnancies between 24 and 33 weeks 6 days of gestation were eligible if they had no immediate indication for delivery. After giving informed consent, patients were randomized either to receive ampicillin (erythromycin if penicillin allergic) until delivery or to enter a control group. Women whose cervical cultures were positive for either group B streptococci or Neisseria gonorrhoeae received treatment. Tocolytics and corticosteroids were not used.
                From January 1990 to February 1992 117 patients (antibiotics 59, control 58) were recruited and analyzed. Prophylactic antibiotics were associated with a longer latent phase (mean 12 vs 7.0 days, p = 0.004) and fewer maternal infectious complications (29% vs 60%, p = 0.001). A higher incidence of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis was observed in the treatment group (14% vs 3.5%, p = 0.05). Other neonatal complications, including death, were lower in the treatment group, but none attained statistical significance (p = 0.09 to 0.33).
                The use of prophylactic antibiotics in selected patients after preterm amnion rupture appears to have a demonstrable maternal benefit. Large, multicenter trials may demonstrate a significant neonatal benefit or confirm any adverse outcomes. In a randomized controlled trial of the use of a single intravenous dose of gentamicin sulfate and clindamycin phosphate used intraoperatively during emergency abdominal surgery, the overall incidence of postoperative wound infection was reduced from 32.3% to 10.4%. Significant reduction in wound infection occurred in the study group compared with control subjects irrespective of the underlying pathologic lesion. No side effects of the use of antibiotics were noted. The policy of antibiotic prophylaxis in emergency surgery seems to be of particular benefit in elderly patients. A prospective, randomized double-blind study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of three prophylactic regimens (oral neomycin and erythromycin, intravenous cefoxitin, and a combination of both oral and intravenous antibiotics) in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. One hundred sixty-nine patients were randomized and 146 patients were evaluable. Septic complications occurred in 11.4 per cent of patients receiving oral antibiotics only, in 11.7 per cent of patients receiving intravenous cefoxitin alone, and in 7.8 per cent of patients receiving both oral and intravenous antibiotics. These differences were not statistically different. The greatest number of septic complications occurred in those patients with anastomotic disruptions. Two patients died (1.3%), both of whom had major anastomotic failures. There was no advantage between any of the groups in the incidence of wound infection (3.9-6.8%). Thus, no advantage could be identified in this study in the combination of oral and intravenous antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery. To analyze the risk of cannula sepsis from indwelling umbilical arterial catheters and the indication for prophylactic antibiotics, 137 catheterized neonates with respiratory distress were prospectively placed into either antibiotic-treated (penicillin 50,000U/kg/day and kanamycin 15 mg./kg./day) or non-treated groups. Although bacteria were frequently isolated from blood and catheter tip cultures obtained upon removal of the catheter, especially among non-antibiotic treated infants, these isolates were predominantly non-pathogens and probably skin flora. Corresponding peripheral blood cultures were usually sterile. No cases of cannula-associated sepsis occurred among treated and non-treated newborns. The risk of bacteriologically proven sepsis resulting from an indwelling umbilical artery catheter appears insufficient to justify prophylactic antibiotics. In a randomized prospective controlled trial involving 311 patients undergoing acute or elective colorectal surgery, the efficacy and safety of two different single dose and one triple dose regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis, as well as the influence of blood transfusion on postoperative infectious complications, were studied. Postoperative infectious complications occurred in a total of 59 patients (19.0 per cent). There were no major differences between the three treatment groups. Thirty-four patients (10.9 per cent) developed abdominal wound infection, 17 patients (5.5 per cent) intra-abdominal abscess and 16 patients (5.1 per cent) anastomotic leakage. Of 202 patients (65.0 per cent) requiring blood transfusion during hospitalization 57 (28.2 per cent; 95 per cent confidence limits of 23-36 per cent) developed infectious complications, whereas two non-transfused patients (1.8 per cent; 95 per cent confidence limits of 0.2 to 6 per cent; P less than 0.001) developed infectious complications. It is concluded that one single dose of antibiotic prophylaxis in acute and elective colorectal surgery is as protective as a triple dose regimen. The development of infectious complications despite antibiotic prophylaxis is strongly related to blood transfusion. Two hundred and twenty-nine patients were entered into a study to compare the effectiveness and safety of two single-shot antibiotic regimes in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in two district general hospitals. A single shot of intravenous (IV) latamoxef disodium was as effective as an IV combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole in control of wound infection following elective large bowel surgery when given as a bolus at the time of anaesthetic induction. The incidence of major wound infection was 6% and was evenly distributed in the two treatment groups. Half the major wound infections were associated with faecal fistulae. A single shot of IV antibiotic at the time of anaesthetic induction was safe, simple and an effective prophylaxis against major wound infection. There was a low incidence (1.3%) of serious postoperative bleeding and no serious adverse reactions were noted. The overall mortality was 9%. Death was significantly related to elderly patients, a poor performance status, operative contamination and wound infections. In a prospective, randomized trial, prophylactic use of topical antibiotics in addition to systemic prophylaxis was studied in patients undergoing abdominoperineal amputation of the rectum. All patients received gentamicin 80 mg and metronidazole 500 mg intravenously at induction of anesthesia, followed by the same dose 8 hourly for 48 hours. In accordance with the randomization, half of the patients were additionally given gentamicin 160 mg + metronidazole 400 mg topically into the perineal wound at closure. Perineal wound infection appeared in 19 of the 41 patients who received both systemic and topical prophylaxis, and in 18 of the 38 with only systemic antibiotics. Cell-mediated immunity was preoperatively assessed with a skin test (Multitest) in all but three patients. Impairment of cell-mediated immunity was associated with significantly heightened rate of wound infection, and these patients did not benefit from topical antibiotics. 30/60 patients electively reconstructed with synthetic arterial grafts were randomly treated with dicloxacillin per- and postoperatively for 6 days. Wound infections occurred in 10 of the non-treated patients. 1 of whom had a graft infection. In the dicloxacillin group no wound infection was recorded. Overgrowth with bacteria resistant to isoxazolylpenicillin was not noticed during treatment. No late infections occurred. In comparison with previous results, improved hygienic routines before, during and after operation reduced the incidence of postoperative graft infections from 15 to 3%. As postoperative infections after synthetic arterial graft implantation are serious complications, per- and postoperative antibiotic treatment seems justified as a complement to a rigorous hygienic routine. A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was performed to evaluate the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis in ear surgery. The present study reports on the results of 750 patients, half of whom received cefuroxime for 1 day, the other half, placebo. All postoperative infections occurring within 2 weeks after the intervention were recorded, together with several preoperative and perioperative parameters. It is concluded that exploratory tympanoplasties (including stapedotomy) and "dry perforation" tympanoplasties should be considered "clean" operations according to the American National Research Council and do not benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis. On the other hand, tympanoplasties performed on draining ears and on ears with cholesteatoma should be considered "dirty" operations for which antibiotic prophylaxis may decrease the postoperative infection rate by factor 3. All postoperative infections healed without sequels under proper treatment, except for three that resulted in graft necrosis--one in the placebo group and two in the cefuroxime group. In consequence, prophylaxis may not be mandatory in the dirty group, although the authors advocate its use for the sake of patient and surgeon comfort. Prophylactic use of topical ampicillin in addition to intravenous ampicillin and metronidazole was studied in a randomized trial including 203 consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. All received ampicillin, 1 g X 3, and metronidazole, 0.5 g X 3, intravenously for at least three days from induction of anesthesia, and 105 also received topical ampicillin, 1 g, in each of the surgical wounds. Deep wound infection or dehiscence was seen in 12 of 105 having both administrations of antibiotics, and in nine of 98 having only intravenous antibiotics. The two groups were similar according to distribution of sex, age, type of surgery, and efficiency of bowel preparation. Topical ampicillin should be omitted in elective colorectal surgery when systemic prophylaxis with ampicillin and metronidazole is used. Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has a low risk for infectious complications, but many surgeons still use prophylactic antibiotics. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the necessity and test the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative infection complications in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
                Low-risk patients were randomly placed into 2 groups: 68 patients (group 1) received cefazolin 1g intravenously after induction of anesthesia, and 76 patients (group 2) were not given prophylactic antibiotics. In both groups, septic complications were recorded and compared.
                Positive bile culture and gallbladder rupture did not significantly increase the rate of surgical site infections. In group 1, there were 3 (4.41%) cases of wound infection, 3 (4.41%) cases of pulmonary infections, and 1 (1.47%) case of urinary tract infection. In group 2, there were 2 (2.63%) cases of wound infection, 2 (2.63%) case of pulmonary infections, and 3 (3.95%) cases of urinary tract infection. No significant difference existed in the complication rates.
                Based on our data, the use of prophylactic antibiotics does not decrease the rate of postoperative infection complications and surgical-site infections and is not necessary in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To reduce the rate of infection at the saphenous vein harvest site after coronary artery bypass surgery, to identify predictors of infection and to determine the best method for leg wound closure.
                A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to determine the best technique for reducing the postoperative leg wound infection rate. Patients were allocated to one of four leg wound closure methods: staples, close immediately; staples, close after protamine administration; subcuticular sutures, close immediately; and subcuticular sutures, close after protamine. Risk factors evaluated were age, sex, diabetes, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, reoperation, time in surgery, wound length, wound depth, time that the wound was open, wound quality and harvest site.
                The Walter C Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
                All consenting patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery involving saphenous vein harvesting were considered for the study. Exclusion criteria were insertion of a drain, insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump in the index limb and inability to complete follow-up at the authors' centre. Eighty patients were initially enrolled, with 77 completing the study.
                Patients underwent standard saphenous vein harvesting followed by wound closure as indicated by the study group.
                The major infection rate was reduced from 13% to 3% (P = 0.02). Each closure method was equally effective, and wound depth was the only factor related to infection.
                Leg wound infections continue to be a major source of morbidity after coronary bypass surgery. In the course of two consecutive, double-blind and prospective studies, the authors evaluated the prophylactic effect of a single peroperative intravenous dose of gentamicin (this study included 166 patients) or the combination gentamicin and clindamycin (this study included 127 patients), on the wound infection rate following interventions involving the incision of an abdominal hollow viscus. Antibiotic prophylaxis lowered the post-operative wound sepsis rate, especially following clinically contaminated interventions, but this reduction did not reach statistical significance. It is concluded that a single peroperative parenteral dose of antibiotics does not constitute an entirely satisfactory means of wound infection prophylaxis in digestive surgery. To test the hypothesis that oral ciprofloxacin is equally effective as intravenous cefuroxime in preventing postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing peripheral arterial surgery involving the groins.
                Prospective, randomised, double-blind multicentre study.
                580 patients undergoing arterial surgery involving the groins were randomised to ciprofloxacin (Ciproxin, Bayer) 750 mg x 2 p.o. or cefuroxime (Zinacef, Glaxo) 1.5 g x 3 i.v. given only on the day of surgery. The primary endpoint was wound/graft infection within 30 days postoperatively. Wound infection was defined as pus.
                The wound infection rate in the ciprofloxacin group was 9.2% (27 patients) and in the cefuroxime group 9.1% (26 patients) according to intention to treat. For correct treatment the corresponding numbers were 9.5% (23 patients) and 9.7% (22 patients), respectively. There were three graft infections (0.5%). The infection rate was 7.1% (31/433) in the absence and 14.9% (22/147) in the presence of distal ulcers (p < 0.05). S. allreus was the most common bacteria isolated. Forty percent of the wound infections were localised to the groins. By multivariate analysis presence of distal ulcer was the only factor of prognostic significance.
                The infection rate was similar in the two groups. Thus, oral administration of ciprofloxacin is an attractive, cost-effective and safe alternative to prophylaxis in vascular patients capable of taking oral medication on the day of surgery. Whether or not topical application of ampicillin is necessary in patients undergoing elective colorectal operations was investigated. After mechanical preparation, 193 patients received 2 grams of cefotaxime administered intravenously from the start of the operation; patients received two more doses within the next 12 hours. In addition, patients were randomized to receive or not receive prophylaxis against infection of 2 grams of ampicillin in the site of the incision at closure. Twenty-three patients did not complete the study. Wound infection occurred in five of 81 patients who had topical application of ampicillin compared with six of 89 patients who did not receive prophylaxis; the difference was not significant. There were no significant differences in rates of wound dehiscence, intra-abdominal abscess or anastomotic leakage. Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis were the predominant microorganisms isolated. Thus, topical application of ampicillin did not lower the wound infection rate when there was a preoperative antibiotic administered intravenously. In a double-blind randomized controlled study 232 patients undergoing elective lower segment caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive a pre-operative prophylactic dose of a combination of crystalline penicillin and chloramphenicol or a placebo. The two groups were comparable in terms of patient characteristics and operation variables. The group receiving antibiotics had significantly fewer febrile and infectious morbid events and thus spent fewer days in hospital than the group receiving the placebo. To compare the efficacy of combined oral and systemic antibiotics (combined) versus systemic antibiotics (systemic) alone in preventing surgical site infection in elective surgery of the colon, and to perform a meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing combined versus systemic antibiotics in elective colon surgery.
                A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.
                The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Montreal, a university-affiliated community hospital.
                Two hundred and fifteen patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery of the colon.
                Patients were randomized to receive neomycin and metronidazole orally (109 patients) or identical placebos (106 patients) on the final preoperative day. All were given amikacin and metronidazole intravenously just before operation. Thirteen randomized series comparing combined and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colon surgery were identified for meta-analysis.
                Rates of postoperative surgical site infections: risk differences, risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs); organisms found in the colon and wound fat at surgery, and in infected wounds.
                Three patients in the systemic group, and 5 in the combined group were excluded. Wound infections occurred in 5 patients in the combined group but in 17 in the systemic group (p < 0.01, RR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.75). Bacteria isolated from wound infections and wound fat were similar to those found in the colon. They were more frequent in the colon in the systemic group (p < 0.001) and occurred in wound fat in the systemic group twice as often as in the combined group (p < 0.001). By stepwise logistic regression, the presence of bacteria in wound fat at surgery was the strongest predictor of postoperative wound infection (p < 0.002). In the meta-analysis, the summary weighted risk difference in surgical site infections between groups (d(w)) and the summary RR both favoured combined prophylaxis (d(w) = 0.56, 95% CI 0.26-0.86; RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.24-0.78; p < 0.001).
                In elective surgery of the colon combined oral and systemic antibiotics are superior to systemic antibiotics in preventing surgical site infections. Orally administered antibiotics add value by reducing bacterial loading of the colon and wound fat contamination, both associated with postoperative wound infection. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials reported from 1975 to 1995 supports these conclusions. In a prospective, controlled, double-blind study, 496 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were given antibiotic prophylaxis with a single dose of either ceftriaxone or ampicillin + metronidazole. No significant intergroup difference was found between the respective overall rates of infectious complications (3.2% and 4.9%). Analysis of the microbiologic findings showed incisional wound infections, mainly caused by gram-negative rods, to be more common in the ampicillin-metronidazole group, whereas deep wound infections were more frequent in the ceftriaxone group. It is concluded that ceftriaxone seems to be more efficient than ampicillin-metronidazole as prophylaxis against incisional wound infection, but should preferably be supplemented with an antianaerobic agent to prevent deep wound infections. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of antibiotic prophylaxy on decreasing the frequency of postoperative infections after cesarean sections performed in cases with no prior indication of a high risk of infection.
                A prospective randomized study included 269 cesarean sections without a high risk of infection performed in the Maternity and Neonatology Ward of the Sousse Hospital from February 1991 to July 1991. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. One group received an antibiotic prophylactic treatment including cephapirine, gentamicin and metronidazole) and the second group was given no treatment.
                Antibiotic prophylactic therapy led to a reduction of infectious morbidity after cesarean section in patients without high risk o infection from 33% to 11%. A 66% rate of efficacy was observed. In addition, antibiotics given in this context led to substantial cost reduction both by reducing the cost of antibiotics prescribed in the postoperative period and by reducing the number of days of hospitalization, and thus total cost.
                This study demonstrated the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxy for cesarean sections in patients without a high risk of infection. Nevertheless, a reevaluation of the antibiotic protocols and a rigorous operative procedure are essential. A total of 169 patients undergoing colorectal surgery were randomly allocated to receive either gentamicin plus metronidazole or oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole as prophylaxis; they were also allocated to receive cover for 1 or 3 days. Twenty-eight patients (17 per cent) developed postoperative wound infections. The proportion of patients with wound infections and other infective complications was significantly less (P < 0.02) in those receiving oral ciprofloxacin. Cover for 3 days was no better than that for only 1 day. Oral ciprofloxacin for prophylaxis may offer advantages in efficacy and ease of administration compared with parenteral antibiotics.
There is clear evidence of the benefits of prophylactic broad spectrum antibiotics. Many other interventions intended to reduce the risk of infection in arterial reconstruction lack evidence of effectiveness.