Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma: stapled or hand-sewn? A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses. [The best anastomoses after colonic resection]. Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial. A randomised study of colostomies in low colorectal anastomoses.
440 patients were prospectively enrolled in a randomized, multicenter trial to compare 4 types of manual (84 interrupted end-to-end, 77 continuous end-to-end, 82 interrupted end-to-side, and 91 continuous end-to-side) (polyglycolic derived suture) and 1 type of stapled (106 side-to-side with GIA+TA devices) ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma. The trial was designed according to Schwartz' pragmatic formulation. All 5 groups were well-matched, except for a lower rate of intraoperative sepsis in the stapled group (P < 0.02). The main end point was anastomotic leakage detected clinically or by routine sodium diatrizoate enema on the 8-10th postoperative day. Results showed that stapled ileocolonic anastomosis was associated with less anastomotic leakages (2.8%) than all the other techniques combined (8.3%). In spite of the fact that staples are approximately ten times more expensive, our results suggest performing side-to-side (GIA+TA) mechanical anastomosis after right resection for carcinoma. A randomized, prospective study should be done to evaluate any new procedure or instrument. Our experience with the end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler suggests that an anastomosis can be created in a shorter time than is required for the traditional hand-sewn technique. This difference is even greater when the anastomosis is technically difficult and located deep within the pelvis. There appears to be little difference in the security of a hand-sewn anastomosis compared with that of stapled anastomosis. Postoperative complications appear similar. With the stapler, however, there is an increased risk of intraoperative complications that are not apparent with the traditional hand-sewn technique. These include rectal tears and anastomotic defects. It appears that the EEA stapler can save as many as 12 percent of rectums that otherwise might have to be removed because of technical inability to perform an anastomosis. Among the numerous anastomotic techniques after colonic resection, the mechanical sutures using staplers have been credited with a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage than hand-sewn anastomoses. This hypothesis has been tested in two multicentre, prospective, randomized trials after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma and after left colectomy with colorectal anastomosis. After right hemicolectomy, the stapled anastomosis using the GIA and TA staplers appeared to be superior to all hand-sewn anastomoses. This superiority was not apparent after left colectomy followed by colorectal anastomosis. Although the leakage rate of stapled anastomoses was similar to hand-sewn anastomoses, they carry a high rate of intra-operative mishaps. Furthermore, the stapler does not permit a lower anastomosis in this study. Finally, the overall cost of a stapled anastomosis is superior to the cost of an hand-sewn anastomosis. One hundred and eighteen patients undergoing low colorectal anastomoses were randomly allocated to reconstitution by either single layer interrupted extramucosal sutures or circular staple gun. In the 60 patients undergoing sutured anastomosis there were 2 (3 per cent) clinical leaks and 4 (7 per cent) radiological leaks, and no failures. Of the 58 patients who underwent stapled anastomosis there were 4 failures, 7 (12 per cent) clinical leaks, 14 (24 per cent) radiological leaks and 1 death. Stapled anastomoses were more than ten times as expensive as sutured anastomoses and there were no savings in time or numbers of associated colostomies. An interrupted extramucosal suture technique remains the ultimate standard for low colorectal anastomosis. To assess the value of covering colostomy for patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal neoplasms.
                Prospective randomised study.
                Two university hospitals, Finland.
                38 patients with air-tight stapled end-to-end anastomoses and complete anastomotic tissue rings were randomly allocated to have a covering colostomy (n = 19) or not.
                Postoperative mortality, anastomotic leaks, reoperations for leaks.
                The clinical leak rate was 24% (9/38) and six patients (16%) had radiological leaks. The total number of leaks (clinical and radiological together) was similar in the two groups, 7/19 compared with 8/19, respectively. There were fewer clinical leaks in the colostomy group (3/19; 16% compared with 6/19; 32%), but the difference was not significant. Reoperations for leaks were necessary more often in patients who did not have a covering colostomy (6/19; 32% compared with 1/19; 5%, p = 0.09). Two patients who did not have a stoma died from the infective complications of their leaks and one died of heart failure in the colostomy group. One patient who had not been given a stoma initially was left with a permanent colostomy after a leak.
                Our results suggest that a covering colostomy does not reduce the leak rate after low anterior resection, but prevents most of the severe infective consequences of the leaks.
Stapled functional end to end ileocolic anastomosis is associated with fewer leaks than handsewn anastomosis.