Occlusal caries prevention in high and low risk schoolchildren. A clinical trial. Clinical effectiveness of an autopolymerized fissure sealant after 2 years. Evaluation of non-invasive treatment applied to occlusal surfaces. Caries-preventive efficacy and retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant: a 3-year split-mouth randomised clinical trial. Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years. Sealant and fluoride varnish in caries: a randomized trial. Comparing the caries-preventive effect of two fissure sealing modalities in public health care: a single application of glass ionomer and a routine resin-based sealant programme. A randomized split-mouth clinical trial. Randomized trial on fluorides and sealants for fissure caries prevention. Effectiveness of a glass ionomer cement used as a pit and fissure sealant in recently erupted permanent first molars. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer/resin-based hybrid materials used as pit and fissure sealants. Clinical success and potential failure after single application of a pit and fissure sealant: a four-year report. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years. Clinical evaluation of three different materials used as pit and fissure sealant: 24-months results. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years. Clinical and antibacterial effectiveness of three different sealant materials. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant. Fissure sealing with a light-cured resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement (Vitrebond) compared with a resin sealant. A 24-month study comparing sealant and fluoride varnish in caries reduction on different permanent first molar surfaces. A comparative study of fluoride-releasing composite resin and glass ionomer materials used as fissure sealants. Fissure sealing of permanent first molars in children receiving a high standard of prophylactic care. Caries preventive effect of a fluoride-containing varnish (Duraphat) after 1 year's study. Evaluation of resin based and glass ionomer based sealants placed with or without tooth preparation-a two year clinical trial. Effects of glass ionomer cement, resin-based pit and fissure sealant and HF applications on occlusal caries in a developing country field trial. The effectiveness of a chemically polymerized sealant in preventing occlusal caries: two year results. [Caries prevention by means of a Na2FPO3-toothpaste after 7 year's application]. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite-based fissure sealant: two-year results. The caries-preventive effect of a fluoride varnish in the fissures of the first permanent molar. Clinical evaluation of FUJI VII sealant material. Noninvasive control of dental caries in children with active initial lesions. A randomized clinical trial. Three-year study of the effect of fluoride varnish (Duraphat) on proximal caries progression in teenagers. Observations on dental caries in primary teeth after frequent fluoride toplications in a program involving other preventives. Three-year caries increments after fluoride rinses or topical applications with a fluoride varnish.
To evaluate the caries-preventive effect of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement used as occlusal sealant (Vitremer) compared with fluoride varnish (Duraphat) application on occlusal surfaces of permanent first molars (OSPFM) in 6-8 year-old schoolchildren (n=268) at high (HR) and low (LR) caries risk.
                The children were followed-up for 24 months after being systematically allocated into six groups as follows: Control Groups HRC and LRC: children receiving oral health education (OHE) every 3 months; Groups HRV and LRV: children receiving OHE plus varnish application biannually; and Groups HRS and LRS: children receiving OHE plus a single sealant application . The baseline and follow-up examinations were performed by the same calibrated dentist under natural light, using CPI probes and mirrors, after toothbrushing and air-drying. The DMFS was used to record dental caries, in addition to the detection of initial lesions (IL). Data analysis was performed with two primary outcome measures: DMF and DMF+ IL on the OSPFM.
                After 24 months, only the HRS group showed statistically lower DMF and DMF+IL increments on OSPFM compared with HRC group. HRV group did not differ from HRC and HRS groups. For LR groups, no statistical difference (P> 0.05) was observed among the treatments. The clinical effectiveness of Delton fissure sealant was studied in 205 children, ages 6--10 years (mean age 71/2). 993 children in grades 1, 2, 3 and 4 were screened and subjects were selected if there was evidence of previous dental caries in the mouth, and a pair of contralateral maxillary or mandibular first permanent molar teeth were free of caries. Two pedodontists independently examined the children in a mobile van equipped with two operatories, and each applied sealants to approximately half of the subjects. After 11 months, in 186 subjects there were 10 sealants partially lost, five experimental teeth carious or filled and 53 control teeth carious or filled. After 24 months, in 175 subjects there were four sealants completely lost, 12 sealants partially lost, 11 experimental teeth carious or filled and 89 control teeth carious or filled. Consequently, sealant retention was 92% after 11 months and 85% after 24 months. Percent effectiveness in caries reduction was 90% after 11 months and 88% after 2 years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive methods of treatment for active incipent occlusal caries. Anamnesis, professional prophylaxis, and visual inspection were used to classify 250 Brazilian pre-school-children. First permanent decayed molars (n=98) from thirty-one subjects (6 years+ 6 months) were selected and divided into three groups. Group 1: fissure sealants with resin-modified glass ionomer - Vitremer (n=29); Group 2: fluoride varnish -Duraphat (n=36) and control group: tooth brushing and 0.2 percent NaF weekly mouthwashes (n=33). Four clinical evaluations were carried out over three, six, nine, and twelve months. Caries activity and progression were observed through clinical and radiographic evaluation. The results were analyzed by Fisher=s Exact test. After twelve months, the results showed 100 percent of arrestment of caries activity for Group 1, 83.3 percent for group 2, and 72.7 percent for control group. At the same time, the results showed 0 percent of caries progression for group 1, 5.5 percent for Group 2, and 6.1 percent for control group. Group 1 showed a better inactivation property than the other groups (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in caries progression among these groups (p>0.05). It was concluded that this non-invasive methods were able to arrest the progression of occlusal caries, but fissure sealant showed better results in controlling caries activity. This prospective clinical trial compared the retention rate and caries-preventive efficacy of two types of sealant modalities over a 3-year period.
                Using a split-mouth randomised design, 1280 sealants were randomly applied on sound permanent second molars of 320 young patients aged between 12 and 16 years. Half of the teeth (n = 640) were sealed with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (Vitremer™, 3M ESPE) and the other half (n = 640) with a conventional light-cure, resin-based fissure sealant (LCRB) (Fluoroshield®, Dentsply Caulk). Teeth were evaluated at baseline, 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, 30- and 36-month intervals with regard to retention and new caries development.
                On the sealed occlusal surfaces after 3 years, 5.10% of RMGIC and 91.08% of LCRB sealants were totally intact and 6.37% of RMGIC and 7.65% of LCRB sealants were partially intact. New caries lesions were found in 20.06% of RMGIC sealed occlusal surfaces, compared to 8.91% for LCRB sealants.
                The findings of the present clinical study suggest that RMGIC should be used only as a transitional sealant that can be applied to newly erupting teeth throughout the eruptive process, whereas LCRB sealants are used to successfully prevent occlusal caries lesions once an effective rubber dam can be achieved. It can be concluded that there are differences between the RMGIC and LCRB sealants over a 3-year period in terms of the retention rate and caries-preventive efficacy. RMGIC can serve as a simple and economic sealing solution, however provisional. Due to its poor retention rate, periodic recalls are necessary, even after 6 months, to eventually replace the lost sealant. The aim of the present study was to investigate the caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with a high-viscosity glass-ionomer with an elevated powder-liquid ratio (ART), of having energy added to this glass-ionomer, and that of glass-carbomer, in comparison to that of resin composite sealants.
                The randomized controlled trial covered 407 children, with a mean age of 8 years. At a school compound three dentists placed sealants in pits and fissures of high caries-risk children. Evaluation by two independent evaluators was conducted after 0.5, 1 and 2 years. The Kaplan-Meier survival method, ANOVA and t-test were used in analyzing the data.
                1352 first permanent molars were sealed. 6.6% of children and 6.8% of sealants dropped out within 2 years. 27 re-exposed pits and fissures, 20 in occlusal and 7 in smooth surfaces, in 25 children, developed a dentin carious lesion. The cumulative survival of dentin carious lesion-free pits and fissures in the glass-carbomer sealant group was statistically significantly lower (97.4%) than those in the high-viscosity glass-ionomer with energy supplied (99%) and the resin-composite (98.9%) sealant groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative survival of dentin carious lesion-free pits and fissures, between the high-viscosity glass-ionomer with (99%) and without (98.3%) energy supplied sealant groups, after 2 years.
                The survival of dentin carious lesion-free pits and fissures was high in all sealant types. More dentin carious lesions were observed in the glass-carbomer sealant group.
                Copyright © 2012 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Little is known about the effect of discontinuation of sealant or fluoride varnish. The purpose of this study was to compare sealant with fluoride varnish in the prevention of occlusal caries in permanent first molars of children over a nine-year period: 4 yrs for program evaluation plus 5 yrs of discontinuation. A clinical trial was conducted on three groups of six- to eight-year-old schoolchildren: a control group (n = 45); a group (n = 37) in which sealant was applied and reapplied up to 36 mos; and a group (n = 38) in which fluoride varnish was applied and re-applied up to 42 mos. Percent caries reduction was studied in these initially healthy molars with complete occlusal eruption: 129 (control), 113 (sealant), and 129 (varnish) molars met inclusion criteria. Of these, 76.7%, 26.6%, and 55.8% had developed occlusal caries at 9 yrs, which implies caries reductions of 65.4% (SE = 8.5%) for sealants vs. control and 27.3% (SE = 10.2%) for varnish vs. control. Furthermore, the varnish program was not effective during the discontinuation period. The aim of this study was to compare the caries-preventive effect of two types of sealant modalities and to evaluate whether the caries-preventive effect is related to sealant retention. A hypothesis was tested in which a glass ionomer sealant, once applied to the occlusal surface, was able to protect the fissure from caries even if the sealant appeared lost at visual inspection.
                A 3-year randomized split-mouth trial evaluating two sealant modalities was performed at a public health centre in Finland. A chemically curing glass ionomer cement (GIC) and light-curing resin-based (RB) sealant material were applied randomly to the permanent second molars. Sealant application as a routine treatment procedure was carried out to 599 children in the age group of 12-16 years. Caries rate of the sealed teeth and sealant retention with both materials were analysed by a modified McNemar's test. The effectiveness, rate difference, and relative risk with both sealant materials were measured.
                The difference in caries rate between the two modalities was highly significant. When compared to the GIC sealant method, the effectiveness of RB sealant method was 74.1% and the rate difference 3.2% (95% CI 1.44%, 4.98%). The relative risk for RB-sealed surfaces vs. GIC-sealed surfaces of having detectable dentin caries was 0.26 (95% CI 0.12, 0.57). The retention rate of sealants was higher with RB than GIC (P < 0.001). The effectiveness of the retention rate for RB sealants was 94.8% and the rate difference 87.2% (95% CI 83.86%, 90.50%). The relative risk during the 3-year study period of having a defective or lost RB sealant was 0.052 (95% CI 0.036, 0.075) when compared to having a defective or lost GIC sealant.
                It is concluded that in preventing dentin caries a RB sealant programme including resealing when necessary was more effective than a single application of GIC. The original hypothesis was thus falsified. To investigate the effectiveness of topical fluorides in preventing fissure caries, we conducted a randomized controlled trial with parallel groups. In total, 501 children (1,539 molars, 3,078 sites), mean age 9.1 years, who had at least one sound permanent first molar with deep fissures or fissures with signs of early caries were recruited. They were randomly allocated among four groups: (1) resin sealant, single placement; (2) 5% NaF varnish, semi-annual application; (3) 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution, annual application; and (4) placebo control. Follow-up examinations were conducted every 6 months by a masked examiner. After 24 months, 485 children (97%) were examined. Proportions of pit/fissure sites with dentin caries in the sealant, NaF, SDF, and control groups were 1.6%, 2.4%, 2.2%, and 4.6%, respectively. A multi-level logistic regression analysis accounting for the effects of data clustering and confounding factors showed that fissures in any of the three treatment groups had significantly lower risks of carious cavity development into dentin than did controls (p < 0.05). We concluded that placement of resin sealant, semi-annual application of NaF varnish, and annual application of SDF solution are all effective in preventing pit and fissure caries in permanent molars (ClinicalTrials.gov number CT01446107). This study's purpose was to evaluate the caries-preventive effect of a glass ionomer cement (GIC) used as an occlusal sealant on recently erupted permanent first molars.
                A double-blind, randomized, controlled, clinical trial was undertaken that included 36 5- to 8-year-olds (and 92 permanent first molars) who were randomly allocated to the test group (GIC) or the control group (auto-polymerized resin-based sealant [RBS]). The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the number of new carious or filled occlusal surfaces in the 2 groups.
                After 6 months, 1 occlusal surface in the test group and 2 occlusal surfaces in the control group showed carious lesions (P=.15). In the fifth year of follow-up, 2 occlusal surfaces in the test group and 7 occlusal surfaces in the control group were filled or carious (P=.42), and the mean number of sealed surfaces that became carious or filled was 0.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.02-0.70) for the GIC-sealed teeth and 0.6 (95% CI=0.20-1.30) for the RBS-sealed teeth (P=.30).
                High-viscosity glass ionomer cement can provide some level of protection against dental caries when used as a dental sealant in newly erupted permanent first molars. The objective of the present study was to clinically evaluate the hybrid materials Vitremer and Dyract when used as pit and fissure sealants.
                The materials were applied in pairs on the mandibular permanent first molars of 100 children, 7 to 8 years old.
                After 12 months of sealing, the clinical evaluation presented rates of 95.9% and 85.7% of complete retention for Dyract and Vitremer, respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference. The hybrid materials presented a statistically significant protective effect against caries compared with the control group at 6 and 12 months.
                The hybrid materials were able to control occlusal caries. A single application of a filled chemically initiated BIS-GMA sealant to permanent first molars of children ranging in age from 5 to 8 years covered the original sites in 52.4% of the 185 teeth examined after four years. Retention of sealant is greater in mandibular (64.7%) than in maxillary (42.0%) molars. The rate of loss of sealant was greatest during the first year (20%), then less than 10% per year at the second, third, and fourth recalls. In comparison with two similar studies, the retention of sealant was 20% to 30% greater. Using the parameters of percent effectiveness, net gain, and DMF scores per 100 test and control teeth, the data from the current study indicate a continued positive effect substantially greater than that in other similar studies. Complete loss of sealant does not appear to predispose that surface to caries any more than its contralateral paired surface. However, a partial loss of sealant because of abrasive wear that results in the exposure of the terminal ends of a fissure is a potential failure in that it creates an environment conducive to caries. Thus, even the well-applied sealant does not necessarily constitute permanent obturation of pits and fissures. Periodic clinical observation is necessary to determine the success or potential failure of the sealant treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the retention and caries preventive efficacy of glass ionomer (Fuji III; GIC) and light-cured resin-based (Delton; LCR) fissure sealants. One hundred and sixty-six 5-14-year-old schoolchildren received sealants on their newly erupted first or second molars; a split mouth design was used. Previously reported 2-year results showed low retention rates for GIC sealants, but no difference in the caries increment between the groups. The same persons were invited to a dental check-up 6.1 to 7.8 (mean 7.1) years after the application of sealants; 111 persons (66.8% of the original group) participated in the study. The retention of sealants, and the caries status of occlusal surfaces and adjacent proximal surfaces was recorded. On the sealed occlusal surfaces, 10% of GIC and 45% of LCR sealants were totally and 9% of GIC and 20% of LCR sealants partially present. Twenty-three (23.5%) of the occlusal surfaces sealed with GIC and 16 (16.5%) of those sealed with LCR were carious or filled. Compared to LCR sealants, the effectiveness of GIC sealants was -44% (95% CI -71%, -16%) and net gain -7% (95% CI -18%, 4%). The relative risk of caries occurring was 1.44 (95% CI 0.96, 2.14). To evaluate the retention and caries experience effects of three different materials used as fissure sealants after 24 months of clinical application: a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (A), a flowable resin composite (B) and a compomer (C). One hundred and seventeen (117) teeth were sealed with material A, 119 teeth with material B and 120 teeth with material C. Children were randomly assigned. Each one received only one of the materials studied. Plaque index, dmft score and socioeconomic level were scored at baseline. The clinical exams were conducted 6, 12 and 24 months after application of the sealant. Statistical analysis (Kruskal-Wallis) revealed that there were statistically significant differences between the retention rates of groups A and B and between groups B and C after 2 years, with material B showing better results. After 2 years, 3.1% of the teeth of group A, 4.3% of group B and 6.7% of group C were Carious+Filled. There was no evidence of association between caries presence after 2 years and plaque index, dmft score and socioeconomic level. These results suggest that flowable resin composite had a satisfactory retention after this period of evaluation and all three materials were effective on occlusal caries prevention. The aim of the present trial was to (1) compare the caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer sealants, placed according to the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) procedure, with composite resin sealants over time and (2) investigate the caries-preventive effect after complete disappearance of sealant material. Forty-six boys and 57 girls, mean age 7.8 years, were randomly divided into two treatment groups in a parallel-group study design. A light-polymerized composite resin sealant material and a high-viscosity glass ionomer were each placed in 180 fully erupted first molars in their respective treatment groups. Evaluation took place annually for 5 years by calibrated examiners. After 5 years, 86% composite resin and 88% glass ionomer sealants did not survive. Three categories of re-exposure periods for caries development in pits and fissures after complete loss of sealants were distinguished: 0-1, 1-2 and 2-3 years. In the 2- to 3-year group, 13 and 3% of pits and fissures previously sealed with composite resin and glass ionomer, respectively, were diagnosed as having developed a dentine lesion. The relative risks (95% CI) of dentine lesion development in surfaces sealed with glass ionomer compared to those sealed with composite resin after 3, 4 and 5 years were 0.22 (0.06-0.82), 0.32 (0.14-0.73) and 0.28 (0.13-0.61), respectively. The relative risks of dentine lesion development in pits and fissures previously sealed with glass ionomer compared with composite resin over re-exposure periods of 1-2 and 2-3 years were 0.26 (0.14-0.48) and 0.25 (0.09-0.68), respectively. We conclude that the caries-preventive effect of high-viscosity glass ionomer sealants, placed using the ART procedure, was between 3.1 and 4.5 times higher than that of composite resin sealants after 3-5 years. Furthermore, high-viscosity (ART) glass ionomer sealants appear to have a four times higher chance of preventing caries development in re-exposed pits and fissures of occlusal surfaces in first molars than light-cured composite resin sealant material over a 1- to 3-year period. A well-designed clinical trial using different types of oral health personnel should be implemented to confirm these initial results. The aim of this work is to study and compare the retention rate, caries-preventing and antibacterial effects of resin-modified glass ionomer and flowable composite in comparison to conventional fissure sealant.
                Forty-five children aged 7-10 years with newly erupted lower first permanent molars were randomly divided into three equal treatment groups. Group I: sealed by a conventional resin sealant; Group II: sealed by resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI); and Group III: sealed by flowable composite. Retention and caries status of the sealed teeth were recorded after 1 month, 6 months, year and 2 years. In addition, Streptococcus mutans counts were assessed at baseline, 1 day, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after sealant application. Data were analyzed by Fisher exact, chi-square and ANOVA tests.
                Group III and Group I showed significantly higher retention rates than Group II fissure sealant (p<0.05). There were no differences of the caries-preventive effects between the tested sealant materials throughout the duration of the study. Streptococcus mutans counts were significantly lower in group II compared to group I or group III up to 6 months of the study (p<0.05). After 1 year of the study the differences of Streptococcus mutans counts were not significant (p>0.05).
                This study indicated a lower retention of RMGI compared to flowable composite and resin sealant without significant difference in caries prevention or long-term bacterial inhibition. To compare the retention and the caries preventive effect of a glass-ionomer developed for fissure sealing (Fuji III) and a chemically polymerized resin-based fissure sealant (Delton).
                A split mouth randomized design using contralateral teeth.
                WHO Regional Demonstration, Training and Research Center for Oral Health, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.
                179 children, 7 years old at the start of the study, were recruited from schools close to the Center. Only children with at least one pair of permanent first molars that were caries free or only had incipient lesions were included in the study. Follow-up examinations for sealant retention were done after 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years. The number of children available for reexamination was 129 (after 6 months); 121 (after 1 year); 115 (after 2 years) and 116 (after 3 years). Four dental hygienists were trained in the sealant procedures and did approximately one fourth of the sealants each.
                After 3 years the glass-ionomer sealant was completely lost in almost 90% of the teeth compared to less than 10% of the resin sealed teeth. After 3 years the relative risk of a tooth sealed with glass-ionomer over that of a tooth sealed with resin was 3.38 (95% CL: 1.98; 5.79). This finding was consistent over type of tooth.
                The glass-ionomer sealant tested in the present study had poorer retention and less caries protective effect than the resin-based sealant used. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the retention and caries-preventive effect of a single application of a light-cured resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement (Vitrebond) in pits and fissures of newly erupted permanent first and second molars, when compared with a single application of a resin-based sealant (Concise White Sealant) during a 3-year period. The study group comprised 73 pairs of contralateral newly erupted permanent first and second molars (136 fissure sites) in 53 children (29 girls, 24 boys). A split-mouth experimental design was used in which the two sealants were randomly allocated to one of the teeth within each pair. Acid etching was not used before application of the glass-ionomer cement. The sealed teeth were checked for retention and caries after 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. The resin-based sealant was almost totally retained after 3 years (97%) and there was no caries in these teeth. The glass-ionomer cement was increasingly lost and could be observed in only 9% of the sealed sites after 3 years. Carious lesions developed in 10 (7.4%) sites (nine teeth, seven children). It was concluded that the resin-based sealant is superior to the glass-ionomer cement in preventing caries, and that the superior retention of the resin probably is an important factor for this. The aim of this study was to determine the separate effects of dental sealants and fluoride varnish on dental caries in fissured and nonfissured surfaces of permanent first molars.
                A clinical trial was conducted with three groups of 6- to 8-year-old schoolchildren: a sealant group (n = 100), in which Delton was applied to first molars; a varnish group (n = 98), in which Duraphat was applied to first molars; and a control group (n = 116), which had no intervention as part of the study. Absolute and percent caries reductions were compared at 24 months.
                Compared to the controls, sealants resulted in a 68 percent and 87 percent reduction on fissured and nonfissured surfaces, respectively. The corresponding figures for varnish were 38 percent and 66 percent.
                Sealant and fluoride varnish are effective in preventing caries in both fissured and nonfissured surface. The objectives of the study were to investigate the clinical use of two fluoride-releasing fissure sealants and to study fluoride release under laboratory conditions.
                In the clinical part of the study the two materials, FluroShield and Baseline, were applied to matched contralateral caries-free first permanent molars in 86 children aged 7-8 years. In the laboratory study fluoride release from each material was measured using a model cavity system.
                After 3 years FluroShield was intact on 70% of teeth. Retention was significantly better on lower molars than upper molars. Baseline was lost from all except two teeth within 6 months. After 3 years, caries had affected four teeth sealed with FluroShield and 24 teeth sealed with Baseline; this difference was highly significant. The laboratory study showed that FluroShield released twice as much fluoride over 9 days than did Baseline. Long term studies using FluroShield showed a small steady fluoride release over 6 months.
                The conclusion of the study was that FluroShield was a much more effective fissure sealant than Baseline. The clinical performance of FluroShield was comparable to that of other inert composite resin sealants and superior to that of fluoride-releasing sealants used previously. The efficiency of sealing the occlusal fissures of permanent first molars was studied in a group of patients 6-9 yr of age receiving a high standard of prophylactic care. Very soon after the eruption one of the teeth in a homomaxillary pair was sealed, and the contralateral was used for control. The control teeth were painted with a fluoride varnish (Duraphat) every 6 months during the trial. 210 sites in 121 children were sealed and followed for a mean observation period of 23 months. At the end of the study, the retention rate was 62.9%, the percentage of effectiveness 24.2%, and the net gain 7.1%. The dmft index (primary molars and canines) was recorded for each patient at the time sealing was performed. A relationship between the caries prevalence in the primary teeth and the susceptibility for fissure caries in the control teeth was found. Effectiveness and net gain was highest in the group of children with 3-6 dmft. The caries prophylactic effect of semi-annual applications of a fluoride-containing varnish (Duraphat) was tested in 121 15-year-old children. The children were divided into a test (60 subjects). The teeth of the children in the test group were coated with fluoride varnish at the beginning of the experimental period and again 6 months later. A clinical and radiographic examination of all children was performed immediately prior to the first application of varnish and 1 year later. The mean caries increment was 0.9 new DMFS in the test group and 4.0 in the control group. The difference was statistically significant at the 0.1% level. The caries prophylactic effect on different tooth surfaces was statistically significant both on proximal and on occlusal surfaces at the 0.1% level. Analyzing the material with respect to the caries prophylactic effect against the background of caries prevalence at the start of the investigation showed a better effect in the group of children with low and medium initial DMFS values. The purpose of this study was to compare the two year clinical performance of two fissure sealants, placed with and without tooth preparation.
                A total of 25 children, between 6-10 years of age, had sealants placed and evaluated for two years at six monthly intervals. All the four first permanent molars of each patient were used in split mouth design and subjected to two different sealants with and without tooth preparation. Teeth were evaluated for defects, retention and development of caries.
                Among the teeth subjected to preparation, 60% of those sealed with glass ionomers and 32% of those sealed with resin sealants showed total loss of sealants at the end of two years. Among the teeth sealed with no preparation, 100% of those sealed with glass ionomers and 80% of those sealed with resin showed total loss. Resin based sealants offered better long term retention compared to glass ionomer-based fissure sealants. Tooth preparation improved the retention of sealants irrespective of the material used. Highest retention was seen in resin sealants with tooth preparation, and lowest retention was seen in glass ionomer-based sealants without preparation. There was a significant increase in caries in teeth sealed after preparation with either material. Teeth sealed with resin sealants exhibited significantly higher caries development compared to teeth sealed with glass ionomers.
                In the current study, resin-based sealants were found to be superior to glass ionomer-based sealants, and tooth preparation improved retention. Loss of sealants seemed to predispose tooth to development of caries, especially in cases where teeth preparation was done. The aim of this community-oriented study was to evaluate different methods to prevent fissure caries. The following products and measures were tested: 1) glass ionomer cement (GIC) applied by dentist; 2) same material applied by short term (3 days) trained personnel (teachers); 3) application of a 0.5% HF solution three times; 4) an established autopolymerized resin based sealant (Delton). The study was performed in Bangkok, Thailand, a city in a developing country experiencing increasing caries prevalence. Children with at least three sound permanent molars from two age groups, 7-8 and 12-13-yr-olds respectively were chosen from very low to medium socioeconomic level families. 1264 children were systematically assigned to experiment or control groups based on school and DMFT. For the younger age group, the 2 yr mean DFS occlusal increment in the Control group was 0.66 surfaces. Significantly lower increments were observed in the GIC experimental group: 0.17 surfaces applied by the teachers and 0.32 applied by dentist, corresponding to 74% and 52% reductions, respectively. The mean increment in the HF group was 0.44 surfaces, a 33% reduction in relation to the Control group. For the 12-13-yr-olds, the mean occlusal surface DF increment was 0.70 surfaces in the Control group. Almost no occlusal increment was found in the Delton group, 0.05 DFS, a 93% reduction. In the GIC Dentist group, the DFS increment was 0.48 and in the Teacher group 0.56, corresponding to 31% and 20% reduction, respectively. A slight and nonsignificant increase of caries in relation to the Control group was observed in the HF group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) nan After 7 years unsupervised use of a Na2FPO3 paste the number of new DMF-surfaces was 36 to 38% lower than in the control group. The caries-inhibiting effect is statistically significant (P less than 0.001). Separate consideration of the first molar reduced caries of the other teeth to 40--42%. A 24-month clinical study was carried out to evaluate and compare the retention rate, marginal integrity and caries preventing effects of a polyacid-modified resin composite based fissure sealant, Dyract Seal, to that of a resin based fluoride fissure sealant, Delton FS+. Fifty-three patients (27 female and 26 male), 7 to 10 years old, were included in the study. At baseline, a total of 192 permanent first molars were sealed with either fissure sealant (n=96, each), using invasive technique. The sealed teeth were evaluated at post-operative 3, 6, 12 and 24 months with respect to evaluation parameters. The data were analyzed with the Chi-Square tests where alpha=0.05. There were no statistically significant differences between fissure sealants as regards to retention and prevention of caries for all periods of the evaluation (p>0.05). However, regarding marginal integrity of the sealants, Delton FS+ gave significantly better results than Dyract Seal for the 3-, 6- and 12-month evaluations, respectively (p<0.05). In conclusion, the use of Dyract Seal on permanent molars with invasive technique was found to be clinically comparable to Delton FS+ for the 24-month evaluation period. The aim of the present study was to assess the caries-preventive effect of topical application of Duraphat on the occlusal surface of newly erupted first permanent molars. A base-line examination was performed on children aged 5 years and 9 months. The children were randomly divided into a Duraphat group and a control group. In accordance with the anatomy of the fissure system, the molars were divided into shallow and deep fissures, respectively. From the time of eruption, 381 molars were examined every 3rd month during 24 months. Duraphat was applied every 6th month, altogether four times. The results showed that in the Duraphat group 35% of the fissures were decayed compared with 80% in the control group. Caries reduction amounted to 56%, and the caries-preventive effect was found in molars with shallow and deep fissures. 200 children of the age groups of 3-5 years and 6-7 years were selected for sealant application, each consisting of 100 children. The clinical retention of Fuji VII was tested in both primary and permanent molar teeth at time intervals of 6 months, 12 months and 24 months follow-up and compared with a resin based sealant, Concise. Results demonstrated that there was no difference in the performance of the materials in primary and permanent teeth. The aim of this study was to investigate whether DMFS increment can be decreased among children with active initial caries by oral hygiene and dietary counseling and by using noninvasive preventive measures. Except for mentally disabled and handicapped children attending special schools, all 11- to 12-year-olds in Pori, Finland, with at least one active initial caries lesion were invited to participate in the study and were then randomized into two groups. Children in the experimental group (n = 250) were offered an individually designed patient-centered preventive program aimed at identifying and eliminating factors that had led to the presence of active caries. The program included counseling sessions with emphasis on enhancing use of the children's own resources in everyday life. Toothbrushes, fluoride toothpaste and fluoride and xylitol lozenges were distributed to the children. They also received applications of fluoride/chlorhexidine varnish. The children in the control group (n = 247) received basic prevention offered as standard in the public dental clinics in Pori. For both groups, the average follow-up period was 3.4 years. A community level program of oral health promotion was run in Pori throughout this period. Mean DMFS increments for the experimental and control groups were 2.56 (95% CI 2.07, 3.05) and 4.60 (3.99, 5.21), respectively (p < 0.0001): prevented fraction 44.3% (30.2%, 56.4%). The results show that by using a regimen that includes multiple measures for preventing dental decay, caries increment can be significantly reduced among caries-active children living in an area where the overall level of caries experience is low.
                2007 S. Karger AG, Basel The effect of sodium fluoride varnish (Duraphat) applications on proximal caries progression was studied during a 3-yr period in 87 teenagers and compared to a control group (n = 107). In the fluoride varnish group the children were treated with fluoride varnish every third month during the experimental period. Caries lesions on the mesial surfaces of first premolars to the mesial surfaces of second molars were recorded annually on radiographs and an individual progression value was calculated. The study showed that topical application of fluoride varnish every third month significantly (P less than 0.05) reduced the progression of proximal caries lesions in premolars and molars. The most obvious reduction of caries progression was observed among children who developed between two and eight new proximal lesions during the test period. In the children with the highest caries activity (greater than nine new proximal lesions) Duraphat treatments did not significantly reduce proximal caries progression in premolars and molars. The anticaries effect of repeated toplications with APF gel was assessed in the primary dentition of 2-6-year-olds after 8, 18 and 28 months. Frequent, but less than daily, topical fluoride therapy appeared to have little effect in pre-school children consuming water-borne fluoride and receiving other traditionally recommended modalities of prevention. 251 9-12-yr-old children completed a 3-yr, double-blind, clinical trial of two caries preventive fluoride programs. Caries increments and progression patterns were compared in two groups of children who rinsed every fortnight with a 0.2% NaF solution or received biannual topical applications with a fluoride varnish (Fluor-Protector). Clinically recorded mean DFS increments were 3.3 +/- 0.2 (SE) in the rinse group and 3.5 +/- 0.2 in the varnish group. In both groups nearly half of these increments were recorded in the occlusal surfaces of second molars. The mean incremental DFS recorded radiographically on approximal surfaces of posterior teeth were 1.1 +/- 0.2 and 1.5 +/- 0.2 in the rinse and varnish group, respectively. None of the inter-group differences were statistically significant (P greater than 0.05). Detailed analyses of the radiographic scores revealed a similar and extremely slow caries progression in the two study groups and they strengthened the conclusion of equal clinical efficacy of the two treatments. None of the fluoride programs had been able to change preestablished patterns of caries development among the children.
The application of sealants is a recommended procedure to prevent or control caries. Sealing the occlusal surfaces of permanent molars in children and adolescents reduces caries up to 48 months when compared to no sealant, after longer follow-up the quantity and quality of the evidence is reduced. The review revealed that sealants are effective in high risk children but information on the magnitude of the benefit of sealing in other conditions is scarce. The relative effectiveness of different types of sealants has yet to be established.