Long-term effects of formoterol and salbutamol on bronchial hyperreactivity and beta-adrenoceptor density on lymphocytes in children with bronchial asthma. A controlled trial of long-term bronchodilator therapy in cystic fibrosis. Equivalence of salbutamol 200 microg four times daily propelled by propellants 11 and 12 or HFA 134a in mild to moderate asthmatics. Eastern European study group. Bronchodilatory effects of salbutamol, ipratropium bromide, and their combination: double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in cystic fibrosis. Short-term regular beta 2-adrenergic agonists treatment is safe in mild asthmatics taking low doses of inhaled steroids. Safety of long-term treatment with HFA albuterol. Results of a multicenter study of nebulized inhalant bronchodilator solutions. Switching patients with asthma from chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) albuterol to hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) albuterol. Effects of the long acting beta agonist formoterol on asthma control in asthmatic patients using inhaled corticosteroids. The Netherlands and Canadian Formoterol Study Investigators. Effect of three different bronchodilators during an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Use of a long-acting inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist, salmeterol xinafoate, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Subsensitivity of bronchodilator and systemic beta 2 adrenoceptor responses after regular twice daily treatment with eformoterol dry powder in asthmatic patients. Sustained bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and symptom control during regular formoterol use in asthma of moderate or greater severity. The Canadian FO/OD1 Study Group.
Long-term treatment with short-acting beta 2-sympathomimetic drugs has recently been suggested to be due to a rise in asthma mortality. This effect has been attributed to an increase in bronchial hyperreactivity, a desensitization of beta 2-adrenoceptors and/or a rebound effect after cessation of the therapy. Formoterol, a new long-acting beta 2-symathomimetic drug, has been reported to possess not only bronchodilatation but also antiinflammatory effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether long-term effects of salbutamol and/or formoterol could deteriorate asthma management. Therefore, in a trial lasting 90 days, we evaluated the effects of the two drugs on lung function, on the protection they provided against inhalative provocation with histamine, and on tachyphylaxis as monitored by the beta-adrenergic density on mononuclear leukocytes (MNL). Two groups of 11 children each with stable asthma were treated with daily doses of either 4 x 200 micrograms salbutamol or 2 x 24 micrograms formoterol in monotherapy. The lung function was measured six times during the trial period, on day 1, and on day 90, before and after inhaling the drug and at all investigations both with and without histamine provocation. In both groups, the bronchodilatory effect of either formoterol or salbutamol remained constant. The lung function values before and after drug inhalation (specific airway resistance sRAW, forced expiration volume FEV1, vital capacity VC) did not alter significantly. After histamine provocation, the protection was more pronounced in the formoterol group. No changes in the beta-adrenoceptor density on MNL and no significant side effects were seen throughout the trial period. We therefore conclude that formoterol protects significantly better against the bronchial challenge with histamine than does salbutamol. Both drugs did not deteriorate the lung function in asthmatic children. In addition, there was no evidence that long-term treatment leads to a desensitization of beta 2-sympathomimetic effects. To evaluate the effect of long-term bronchodilator therapy in CF patients with demonstrated bronchial hyperresponsiveness, we first performed methacholine challenges to determine responsiveness, then entered 27 patients (16 methacholine responders and 11 nonresponders) into a two-month double-blind crossover trial of albuterol, 90 micrograms by inhalation four times a day vs placebo. Among the responders, daily PEFR measures improved significantly more during treatment with albuterol (12 +/- 32 L/min) than with placebo (-0.4 +/- 19 L/min; p less than 0.05). In addition, a clinically important level of improvement in PEFR (15 percent increase) was reached significantly more frequently in the responders. Methacholine nonresponders had no change in PEFR on either albuterol or placebo. Daily symptom scores as well as spirometry measurements at biweekly visits did not show significant changes. We conclude that long-term therapy with inhaled albuterol improves lung function in CF patients, but only in those with bronchial hyperresponsiveness as demonstrated by methacholine challenge. The phasing out of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) requires the development of an alternative non-ozone depleting propellant for use in pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs). The present study assessed the effects on tolerability and efficacy of a switch from the currently available formulation containing the CFC propellants 11 and 12 to an alternative non-CFC formulation using the propellant hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) 134a in patients with mild to moderate asthma. After a 4-week run-in period during which patients received salbutamol 200 microg four times daily from a CFC pMDI, 547 patients were randomized to 12 weeks of treatment with salbutamol 200 microg four times daily administered from either an HFA 134a pMDI (Ventolin CFC-free; 277 patients) or CFC pMDI (Ventolin, 270 patients). At the end of this period, all patients then received a further 4 weeks of treatment with the same dose of salbutamol via a CFC pMDI (run-out period). On the basis that high doses of beta2-agonists are known to increase heart rate, change in heart rate was selected as the primary outcome variable. Small increases in heart rate were observed during the treatment period and these changes were comparable in both groups; the 90% confidence interval for the treatment differences was within the predefined limits for clinical equivalence (+/- 10 beats min(-1)). The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups and there were no reports of paradoxical bronchospasm. Furthermore, daily PEF measurements showed comparability in terms of lung function. Symptom scores and use of additional bronchodilator were also similar in both groups. These results demonstrate that salbutamol (800 microg day(-1)), formulated with HFA 134a is equivalent to the current CFC formulation in terms of tolerability and efficacy. The efficacy of inhaled sympathomimetic and anticholinergic agents on airway obstruction in cystic fibrosis (CF) has been proven in several studies. However, studies comparing combined therapy with monotherapy led to divergent results, probably due to different study designs, different dosages, and the small numbers of patients investigated. Therefore, we wanted to answer the question which inhalation has the best short term effect: a sympathomimetic or an anticholinergic agent, or the combination of both. We investigated 17 patients with CF on 4 successive days in the morning, using pulmonary function testing before and 30 min after inhalation. Each patient received aerosolized salbutamol (SB, maximum dose (max.) 2.5 mg), ipratropium bromide (IB, max. 0.5 mg), the combination of both, or placebo (normal saline) in a randomized, double-blind crossover design. The mean forced expiratory volume in the first second improved significantly (adjusted P-value < 0.017) after each treatment compared to placebo. Analysis of variance showed that SB and combination therapy with SB and IB were superior to IB alone, without significant difference between SB and combination therapy. Response of a patient to combined therapy was usually associated with response to SB. Long-term efficacy and side effects of treatment with bronchodilators still remain to be investigated after this short term study. We conclude that in CF patients bronchodilator therapy with sympathomimetic agents is usually sufficient. Only in cases with proven additional benefit from inhalation by anticholinergics should combination therapy be recommended. Regular treatment with beta 2-adrenergic agonists is controversial in bronchial asthma. To investigate whether beta 2-adrenergic agonists can be used safely if associated with low doses of inhaled steroids, for a short period, without a deterioration of asthma control, we have examined 24 mild asthmatics. In a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 1 week of run-in and run-out period framed 3 weeks of treatment. All patients received inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP 250 micrograms t.i.d.); after 1 week, 12 patients inhaled 400 micrograms of broxaterol and 12 patients received placebo t.i.d. FVC, FEV1, PD20-FEV1 methacholine, morning and evening PEF, and PEF amplitude % mean were measured before, during, and after treatment. No significant changes were noted in patients receiving inhaled broxaterol. There were no differences in symptoms and the use of rescue medication (salbutamol spray). We conclude that short-term regular treatment with beta 2-adrenergic agonists is not associated with a deterioration in asthma control in mild asthmatics inhaling low doses of steroids. Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) used as propellants in metered-dose inhalers deplete stratospheric ozone, which results in serious public health concerns. Albuterol has been reformulated in the non-ozone-depleting propellant, hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA albuterol).
                The primary objective was to compare the safety of HFA albuterol to an albuterol product formulated in chlorofluorocarbon propellants (CFC albuterol) during 1 year of treatment in asthmatics. Bronchodilator efficacy of the two products was assessed as a secondary objective.
                The results from two open-label, parallel-group trials of similar design in asthmatics requiring short-acting beta-agonists for symptom control were combined. Patients took two puffs bid of either HFA albuterol or CFC albuterol for 1 year. Additional puffs of study drug were allowed as needed to control asthma symptoms. Adverse events were recorded at clinic visits. Patients self-administered study drug at quarterly visits and underwent serial spirometry during a 6-h period postdose. Bronchodilator efficacy variables, based on FEV1 response to study drug, were proportion of responders, time to onset of effect, peak percent change, time to peak effect, duration of effect, and area under the curve. Differences between products and changes over time in efficacy variables were assessed using an analysis of variance model. Regression analyses with FEV1 as a covariate were performed post-hoc to analyze changes in bronchodilator efficacy over time.
                Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar for patients receiving HFA albuterol (n = 337) and CFC albuterol (n = 132). Total reported adverse events were similar for the two treatments. Differences in only four individual adverse events were noted: the HFA albuterol group reported more gastroenteritis and dizziness; the CFC albuterol group reported more epistaxis and expectoration. Adverse events attributed to study drug use were infrequent. No serious adverse events were related to study drug use. Predose FEV1 at quarterly visits increased to a small extent in both groups from month 0 to month 12. The bronchodilator efficacy of HFA albuterol was comparable to that of CFC albuterol at the quarterly visits, but decreased from baseline for both products over the 12 months of treatment. Use of inhaled corticosteroids, nasal corticosteroids, or theophylline did not explain the increase in predose FEV1 over time and did not protect patients from developing reduced bronchodilator efficacy by month 12. The change in predose FEV1 did not entirely account for the reduced bronchodilator efficacy over time.
                HFA albuterol has a safety profile similar to that of CFC albuterol during chronic, scheduled use, and both drugs are well tolerated. HFA albuterol and CFC albuterol provided comparable bronchodilator efficacy, but bronchodilator efficacy decreased for both products with 1 year of use. The efficacy, persistence of bronchodilator action, and safety of the quaternary ammonium anticholinergic agent, ipratropium bromide (500 microgram), and placebo were compared when each was added in solution form to the beta-adrenergic agonist solution, metaproterenol sulfate (15 mg), and administered three times daily for 12 weeks to a total of 213 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Subjects had a mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of approximately 1 liter (37% of predicted) and were permitted to use nonanticholinergic therapy for COPD throughout the trial. The study was a randomized, double-blind, 85-day, parallel-group, eight-center study. On a 3 test days, 1, 43, and 85, mean peak responses for FEV1 and forced vital capacity and mean area under the curve were significantly higher for the iprathropium bromide-metaproterenol combination than for metaproterenol only. Duration of action was also significantly longer for the combination therapy than for the beta-agonist alone on test days 1 and 43. Neither treatment regimen produced an demonstrable effect on daily morning peak expiratory flow rates, reported respiratory symptoms, or quality of life. Both treatment regimens were similarly well tolerated with a comparable frequency of adverse events. These results suggest that the combination of iprathropium bromide and metaproterenol inhalation solutions offers a potential therapeutic advantage to patients with symptomatic COPD over nebulized metaproterenol alone without the risk of increased side effects. Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants deplete stratospheric ozone. Production and use of CFCs, except for certain critical exemptions, has been prohibited by the Montreal Protocol. Use of CFCs as propellants in metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) is still allowed, but the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is planning the transition to alternative propellants for use in MDIs. Hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA), a non-ozone-depleting propellant, has been used to reformulate albuterol (HFA albuterol). This study evaluates whether comparable safety and efficacy continues for 12 weeks after patients with asthma are switched from CFC albuterol to HFA albuterol. Patients with asthma stabilized on CFC albuterol during a 12-week safety and efficacy trial were randomized to either continue receiving CFC albuterol or to be switched to receive HFA albuterol in a yearlong safety and efficacy trial. Safety and efficacy were compared over the first 12 weeks of the yearlong trial between patients who had remained on CFC albuterol and those who had been switched to HFA albuterol. Bronchodilator efficacy was evaluated by serial spirometry for 6 hr after the patients self-administered the study drug in the clinic. Safety was assessed by measuring changes in pulse rate, blood pressure, and electrocardiogram (ECG) intervals after dosing with study drug, monitoring adverse events, and performing prestudy and poststudy laboratory testing and physical examinations. No significant differences in bronchodilator efficacy between the patients continuing to receive CFC albuterol and those switched to HFA albuterol were found in the 12 weeks after the switch. No differences between the two products were found for changes in pulse rate, blood pressure, and ECG intervals. Adverse event profiles were similar for the two products, except the patients remaining on CFC albuterol reported increased asthma symptoms and rhinitis significantly more often than the patients switched to HFA albuterol. No clinically meaningful changes in laboratory tests or physical examinations were found in either treatment group. Patients with asthma switched from CFC albuterol to HFA albuterol receive comparable bronchodilation with a similar safety profile as those continuing to receive CFC albuterol. The long acting beta 2 agonist formoterol has proved to be an effective bronchodilator with a prolonged action of 12-14 hours. However, the precise role of formoterol in the maintenance treatment of asthma is still under debate. A study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with formoterol for six months in subjects with asthma.
                In a multicentre double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study 239 subjects with mild to moderate asthma were randomly assigned to treatment with either inhaled formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily (n = 125) or placebo (n = 114) during eight months. The study consisted of a four week run in period, a 24 week treatment period, and a four week washout period. All subjects were using regular inhaled corticosteroids (100-3200 micrograms daily) but were still needing at least five inhalations of short acting beta 2 agonist per week for symptom relief. The study was performed in 10 outpatient clinics in Canada, and five outpatient clinics and one coordinating centre for 44 Dutch general practitioners in The Netherlands. Twice daily self-reported peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements, symptom scores, and rescue beta 2 agonist use during the last 28 treatment days compared with baseline values were used as main outcome measures. Spirometric values were measured at entry, at the start of treatment, after four, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, and after four weeks washout.
                One hundred and twenty five subjects received formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily via Turbohaler and 114 received placebo. Baseline FEV1 was 67.1% predicted and mean bronchodilator reversibility was 26%. The mean total asthma symptom score was 3.6 (maximum possible 21). A significant decrease in symptoms in favour of formoterol (difference from placebo -0.64, 95% CI -0.04 to -1.23, p = 0.04) was observed. Compared with placebo, morning PEF increased (difference from placebo 28 l/min, 95% CI 18.3 to 37.7, p = 0.0001) and the use of short acting beta 1 agonists decreased (daytime difference from placebo -1.1 inhalation, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.7, p = 0.0001) in the formoterol group. PEF returned to baseline following discontinuation of formoterol, as did asthma symptom scores. Thirty three patients treated with formoterol and 32 treated with placebo required treatment with prednisolone during the study (58 and 55 courses, respectively).
                Adding formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily by Turbohaler to inhaled corticosteroids was effective in improving symptom scores and morning PEF, and decreasing the use of rescue beta 2 agonists. There was no apparent loss of asthma control during 24 weeks of treatment with formoterol. This study evaluates the effect of three different bronchodilators (beta 2-adrenergic, anticholinergic and methylxanthine) alone and in randomized sequence, during an exacerbation in thirteen patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Dose-response curves were obtained for inhaled salbutamol and inhaled ipratropium bromide. The bronchodilator effect of a perfusion of aminophylline was also assessed. When a plateau of bronchodilatation was achieved with one agent, one dose of a second bronchodilator was administered to see whether additional bronchodilation could be achieved. The increments in FEV1 and FVC were similar with the three agents. The addition of a second bronchodilator did not result in significant increments in most of the patients. In at least half of the patients the doses of salbutamol and ipratropium that produced the maximal bronchodilatation were twice that currently employed. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a condition in which continuous bronchodilation may have clinical advantages. This study evaluated salmeterol, a beta-agonist bronchodilator with a duration of action substantially longer than that of short-acting beta-agonists, compared with ipratropium, an anticholinergic bronchodilator, and placebo in patients with COPD. Four hundred and five patients with COPD received either salmeterol 42 microg twice daily, ipratropium bromide 36 microg four times daily, or placebo for 12 wk in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients were stratified on the basis of bronchodilator response to albuterol (> 12% and > 200-ml improvement) and were randomized within each stratum. Bronchodilator response was measured over 12 h four times during the treatment period. Salmeterol provided similar maximal bronchodilatation to ipratropium but had a longer duration of action and a more constant bronchodilatory effect with no evidence of bronchodilator tolerance. Both active treatments were well tolerated. Salmeterol was an effective bronchodilator with a consistent effect over this 12-wk study in patients with COPD, including those "unresponsive" to albuterol. The long duration of action of salmeterol offers the advantage of twice daily dosing compared with the required four times a day dosing with ipratropium. There is controversy as to the role of long acting beta 2 agonists such as eformoterol and, in particular, whether bronchodilator tolerance occurs during continuous therapy. The purpose of this study was to extend previous observations of bronchodilator subsensitivity with metered dose eformoterol aerosol in order to assess whether tolerance also occurs with a dry powder formulation of the same drug.
                Sixteen asthmatic patients of mean age 33 (range 18-53) years and FEV1 (% predicted) of 64 (3)%, of whom 13 were receiving inhaled corticosteroids, received regular treatment with eformoterol 24 micrograms twice daily or placebo twice daily (without beta 2 agonists) given concurrently for four weeks in a randomised double blind cross-over design. An initial two week run-in was used when beta 2 agonists were withdrawn and substituted with ipratropium bromide. Dose-response curves to eformoterol (cumulative dose 6-102 micrograms) for airways and systemic beta 2 responses were constructed at the end of each treatment period.
                Baseline values for airways and systemic responses were similar. The peak delta FEV1 response from the dose-response curve (as change from baseline) and the delta response for FEV1 and FEF25-75 at six hours after the last dose were attenuated after eformoterol compared with placebo: peak delta FEV1 response 1.001 with placebo v 0.841 with eformoterol (95% CI 0.04 to 0.28); at six hours 0.931 with placebo v 0.581 with eformoterol (95% CI 0.20 to 0.50); and for delta FEF25-75 at six hours 1.29 1/s with placebo v 0.87 1/s with eformoterol (95% CI 0.15 to 0.69). Morning peak expiratory flow rate was significantly improved during treatment with eformoterol (451 1/min) compared with placebo (399 1/min) (95% CI 21 to 82). Systemic beta 2 responses were blunted after eformoterol, together with a reduction in lymphocyte beta 2 receptor binding density.
                Regular twice daily eformoterol dry powder may produce bronchodilator subsensitivity in terms of both peak and duration of response to cumulative repeated doses of eformoterol. Systemic beta 2-mediated adverse effects also showed tolerance, which was mirrored by downregulation of lymphocyte beta 2 adrenoceptors. Recent studies have raised concern that regular inhalation of beta2 -agonists may cause a worsening of asthma control compared with on-demand dosing regimens.
                The objective of this study was to compare the effect of twice daily formoterol (Foradil), 4 times daily albuterol, and on-demand albuterol on bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), lung function measurements, symptoms, and other indicators of disease control over 6 months inpatients with asthma of moderate or greater severity receiving concomitant inhaled corticosteroids. We also looked for occurrence of rebound BHR on discontinuation of treatment.
                This was a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, clinical trial. Methacholine PC20 was the primary outcome variable. Other outcome variables included symptom scores, use of rescue medication, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), serial FEV1 measurements, and asthma exacerbations.
                Of the 271 randomized patients, 217 completed the study. Formoterol was significantly superior to on-demand albuterol with regard to methacholine PC20, FEV1, PEF, symptom scores, and use of rescue medication at each measured time point/interval. Regular albuterol was superior to on-demand albuterol with regard to PC20 and FEV1, but not PEF or various clinical scores. After a small drop in the magnitude of bronchoprotection and bronchodilatation occurring shortly after randomization, there was no evidence of progressive tolerance to either regular treatment for any of the measured variables or of rebound increase in BHR 2 days after the end of treatment. The formoterol group had the lowest number of exacerbation days, as defined by high intake of rescue bronchodilator and/or symptom scores, whereas the number of exacerbations requiring increased corticosteroid coverage was similar in the 3 groups.
                In patients with asthma of moderate or greater severity receiving inhaled corticosteroids, formoterol taken twice daily resulted in superior bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and clinical control compared with on-demand albuterol over 6 months. Four times daily albuterol was superior to on-demand albuterol for only some of the end points. Progressive tolerance and a rebound increase in BHR on discontinuation of beta-agonists were not found
It was not possible to determine fully the effectiveness of inhaled bronchodilators in CF as a meta-analysis was not possible. However, short and long-acting beta-2 agonists can be beneficial both in the short and long term in individuals with demonstrable bronchodilator responsiveness or bronchial hyper-responsiveness. As we found no evidence, the use of fenoterol, formoterol or tiotropium in CF cannot be supported.