The potent somatostatin analogue vapreotide does not decrease pancreas-specific complications after elective pancreatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Randomized controlled multicentre trial of somatostatin infusion after pancreaticoduodenectomy. [Somatostatin in the prevention of postoperative increase of pancreatic enzyme after pancreatic surgery]. [Effect of somatostatin on basal and stimulated exocrine pancreatic secretion after partial duodenopancreatectomy. A clinical experimental study]. The role of somatostatin in 67 consecutive pancreatectomies: a randomized clinical trial. [Somatostatin prophylaxis following cephalic duodenopancreatectomy]. Effects of somatostatin prophylaxis after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: increased delayed gastric emptying and reduced plasma motilin. A randomized, prospective trial of postoperative somatostatin analogue in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Role of octreotide in the prevention of postoperative complications following pancreatic resection. Randomized controlled multicentre study of the prevention of complications by octreotide in patients undergoing surgery for chronic pancreatitis. [Prospective and randomized study on the usefulness of octreotide in the prevention of complications after cephalic duodeno-pancreatectomy]. Combination of LHRH analog with somatostatin analog and dexamethasone versus chemotherapy in hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a randomized phase II study. A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of somatostatin with injection sclerotherapy in the control of bleeding oesophageal varices. Prospectively randomized trial using perioperative low-dose octreotide to prevent organ-related and general complications after pancreatic surgery and pancreatico-jejunostomy. Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of complications of elective pancreatic surgery. Italian Study Group. Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of somatostatin for variceal bleeding. Emergency control and prevention of early variceal rebleeding. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of somatostatin in the management of acute hemorrhage from esophageal varices.
Pancreatectomy can be complicated by pancreatic anastomotic leakage, causing major morbidity.
                Our aim was to determine if vapreotide, a potent long-acting somatostatin analogue, would decrease pancreas-related complications. This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involved 275 patients without preexisting chronic pancreatitis undergoing elective proximal, central, or distal pancreatectomy. Complications were defined by objective criteria before beginning the study.
                One hundred thirty-five patients received vapreotide; 140 patients received placebo. There were no statistically significant differences between vapreotide- and placebo-treated patients in either pancreas-related complications (30.4% versus 26.4%, respectively) or in other complications not directly related to the pancreas (40% versus 42%, respectively).
                The potent somatostatin analogue vapreotide does not appear to decrease postoperative complications after major pancreatectomy in patients without chronic pancreatitis. It remains debatable whether somatostatin can prevent pancreatic fistula and other pancreatic stump-related complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. This study assessed the effects of somatostatin-14 (S-14) on pancreatic remnant exocrine secretion.
                This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy. Patients received a continuous infusion of S-14 (n = 38) or placebo (n = 37) for 7 days. Pancreatic juice and peripancreatic drainage fluid was collected and measured, and pancreatic enzymes were monitored daily. Postoperative complications were recorded.
                S-14 infusion was associated with a decrease in median daily pancreatic juice and pancreatic amylase output. Amylase concentration and output in the peripancreatic drain fluid were significantly lower after S-14 infusion than in the control group (both P < 0.05). The incidence of clinical pancreatic fistula (two of 38 versus eight of 37; P < 0.05) and total pancreatic stump-related complications (five of 38 versus 12 of 37; P < 0.05) was lower in patients treated with S-14. Duration of hospital stay was shorter after S-14 (18 versus 26 days; P = 0.01).
                Although the effect of S-14 on exocrine secretion remains difficult to demonstrate, it did reduce pancreatic juice leakage from the pancreatic remnant. The prophylactic effect of perioperative use of somatostatin on postoperative increase of pancreatic digestive enzymes was investigated in this double blind, randomized study. Thirty three patients undergoing pancreatic surgery because of chronic pancreatitis were divided randomly into two groups. Fifteen patients received somatostatin- (dose 125 micrograms/hour), 18 placebo-infusion, pre- and postoperatively for a total time of 48 hours. The level of serum amylase, lipase, gammaGT, calcium, creatinine and blood glucose was determined every 12 hours. In the placebo group the serum lipase and amylase increased significantly (p less than 0.001), while the calcium decreased. In the somatostatin treated patients only the lipase level increased significantly (p less than 0.01), while the amylase and calcium showed no significant changes compared to their initial values. The postoperative increase in serum enzyme levels is interpreted as being an indicator of pancreatic injury. These results suggest that the perioperative use of somatostatin has beneficial effect for the prevention of pancreatic enzymes increases, associated with pancreatic surgery or its complications in patients with chronic pancreatitis. In a prospective trial 30 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple operation) for cancer. They were randomly assigned to receive Somatostatin (SST) (n = 15) or not (n = 15). SST was started at laparotomy with 250 micrograms/h and given over a period of 5 days. A small catheter, which was placed into the duct of the pancreatic remnant, gave access to the pancreatic juice. Volume, amylase, lipase and protein as well as bicarbonate outputs were analyzed. As regards endocrine function, insulin and glucagon plasma levels were measured. The nitrogen balance was calculated. A stimulation test was done on the fifth postoperative day. Six patients (3/3) were assessed as drop-outs. A significant reduction was found for volume, amylase, lipase, protein and bicarbonate with SST, this effect lasting for two days. Lipase however was reduced significantly for 5 days. Pancreatic exocrine function was reduced as well after stimulation, if SST was given. Insulin and glucagon were inhibited with SST, the latter more effectively. We found a positive nitrogen-balance as early as on the second postoperative day in the SST-group, whereas without SST this did not occur before the fourth postoperative day. This findings were significant on the third and fourth postoperative day. The inhibitoric effects of SST, which are demonstrated by our laboratory investigations, conform very well with a more favorable clinical course and a reduction of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Somatostatin has been found to be effective in the prevention of postoperative complications in pancreatic surgery. It can inhibit the pancreatic secretions that, quite often, are responsible for complications during the postoperative period.
                We randomized 67 patients in 2 groups. In the study group (n = 35), somatostatin was administered 30 minutes prior to surgery as well as intraoperatively and postoperatively. No medication was given to the control group (n = 32). Biopsies were taken and processed for electron microscopy and ultrastructural morphometric analysis.
                Administration of somatostatin reduced the exocrine granule number, and the patients suffered from fewer postoperative complications.
                Somatostatin reduces granule number and size of pancreatic cells, which can partially explain the prophylactic effect of the drug on early complications of pancreatic surgery, and which is confirmed by the clinical findings. This study was aimed at assessing the value of prophylactic somatostatin after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy. A randomized prospective study was undertaken using two groups of patients, one with prophylactic somatostatin (4.5 mg daily in continuous perfusion for 7 days postoperatively), known as group I, and group II, which did not receive somatostatin. During a five-year period, from April 1989 to April 1994, we performed 35 duodenopancreatectomies, of which 21 belonged to group I and 14 to group II. We found a lower incidence of pancreatic anastomosis fistulae in group I (9.5% vs 35.7%; p < 0.05). We did not find any correlation between prophylaxis with somatostatin and the appearance of other complications or postoperative mortality. The mean time of fistula closure in group I was 5 days while that of group II was 19.2 days. In conclusion, the administration of prophylactic somatostatin after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy reduces the incidence and duration of pancreatic fistula. Somatostatin inhibits gastroenteropancreatic exocrine secretion and is often used after pancreaticoduodenectomy to reduce pancreatic secretion to minimize tissue damage and pancreatic stump complications. Because our earlier clinical work saw a major increase in delayed gastric emptying (DGE) with somatostatin prophylaxis after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD), this small-group study was designed to confirm or disprove that observation. From August 1997 to December 2000, a total of 23 post-PPPD patients were randomized to receive somatostatin prophylaxis [somatostain (+)] (n = 11) or not [somatostatin] (-) (n = 12). The incidence of DGE, scintographic solid-phase emptying results on day 14 postoperatively, and sequential fasting plasma motilin levels were compared, as motilin levels are related to both gastric motility and somatostatin levels. The somatostatin(+) group exhibited greatly increased patient complaints of DGE: 9 of 11 (82%) versus 3 of 12 (25%) in the somatostatin(-) group. Radiologic scintography showed somatostatin prophylaxis prolonged the half-time (T(1/2)) of solid-phase emptying: 144.5 +/- 51.4 minutes for somatostatin(+) versus 89.0 +/- 59.9 minutes for somatostatin(-) (p < 0.001). Comparing pre-PPPD and post-PPPD plasma motilin levels prior to somatostatin infusion, motilin decreased 80% in reaction to the surgery. For somatostatin(-) patients, motilin levels oscillated, or "rang," postoperatively, reaching a higher level on day 3, declined to a new record minimum on day 7, and by day 21 were 50% of the original and the slope of the recovery curve was increasing well. In somatostatin(+) patients the same ringing pattern was observed but decreased with motilin levels 30% to 70% lower than in the somatostatin(-) patients. By day 21 somatostatin(+) motilin levels were recovering but still only 20% original levels, and the slope of the recovery curve was not optimistic. On postoperative day 14 the plasma motilin levels (below approximately 6 bg/ml) correlated strongly with DGE for both groups. Despite the small sample size, the results indicated that (1) somatostatin prophylaxis significantly decreases fasting plasma motilin; (2) somatostatin prophylaxis produces lingering suppression of plasma motilin; (3) PPPD surgery itself significantly reduces fasting motilin levels with recovery to 50% normal at day 21; (4) the mechanism of somatostatin-induced DGE seems related to reduced fasting plasma motilin levels. Pancreatic surgery is not uncommonly complicated by prolonged pancreatic drainage and fistula. Octreotide decreases pancreatic exocrine function and has been reported to improve closure of pancreatic and intestinal fistulae. This randomized, prospective trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative octreotide in reducing pancreatic drainage and complications after resection of neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas.
                Patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas were entered into the study and randomized after operation to receive octreotide 150 micrograms subcutaneously every 8 hours or saline solution subcutaneously every 8 hours in a double-blinded fashion. Daily pancreatic drainage, total drainage, number of days to drain removal, and complications were recorded.
                Ten patients were given octreotide; eleven patients were given saline solution. The number of days to drain removal, daily drainage, and total drainage were not significantly different. Complications related to pancreatic drainage were not significantly different.
                Octreotide is not indicated for the routine postoperative management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Though morbidity and mortality rates following pancreatic resection have improved in recent years, they are still around 35% and 5%, respectively. Typical complications, such as pancreatic fistula, abscess, and subsequent sepsis, are chiefly associated with exocrine pancreatic secretion. In order to clarify whether the perioperative inhibition of exocrine pancreatic secretion prevents complications, we assessed the efficacy of octreotide, a long-acting somatostatin analogue. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in 246 patients undergoing major elective pancreatic surgery. Patients were stratified into a high-risk stratum (limited to patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors) or low-risk stratum (patients with chronic pancreatitis). Patients received octreotide (3 x 100 micrograms) or placebo subcutaneously for 7 days perioperatively. Eleven complications were defined: death, leakage of anastomosis, pancreatic fistula, abscess, fluid collection, shock, sepsis, bleeding, pulmonary insufficiency, renal insufficiency, and postoperative pancreatitis. Two hundred patients underwent pancreatic head resection, 31 patients underwent left resection, and 15 patients had other procedures. The overall mortality rate within 90 days was 4.5%, with 3.2% in the octreotide group and 5.8% in the placebo group. The complication rate was 32% in the patients receiving octreotide (40 of 125 patients) and 55% in patients receiving placebo (67 of 121 patients) (p less than 0.005). In the patients in the high-risk stratum, complications were observed in 26 of the 68 (38%) patients treated with octreotide and in 46 of 71 (65%) patients given placebo (p less than 0.01). Whereas in patients in the low-risk stratum, the complication rate was 25% (14 of 57 patients) in those treated with octreotide and 42% (21 of 50 patients) in patients given placebo (p = NS). The perioperative application of octreotide reduces the occurrence of typical postoperative complications after pancreatic resection, particularly in patients with tumors. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre trial was carried out in 247 patients undergoing major elective surgery for chronic pancreatitis to clarify whether the perioperative application of octreotide prevents postoperative complications. Eleven complications were defined, including death, anastomotic leakage, pancreatic fistula, abscess, fluid collection, shock, sepsis, bleeding, pulmonary insufficiency, renal insufficiency and postoperative pancreatitis. A total of 124 patients underwent pancreatic head resection, 55 left resection, 61 pancreaticojejunostomy and seven had other procedures. The overall mortality rate was 1.2 per cent (octreotide group 1.6 per cent, placebo group 0.8 per cent [corrected] (P not significant)). The postoperative complication rate in the octreotide group was 16.4 per cent (20 of 122 patients) and in the placebo group 29.6 per cent (37 of 125) (P < 0.007). The perioperative application of octreotide substantially reduces the risk of postoperative complications in patients undergoing major pancreatic surgery for chronic pancreatitis. This study seeks to evaluate the role of the somatostatin analogue Octreotide as postoperative prophylaxis in the prevention of pancreatic fistula following Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
                A prospective and randomized study has been completed in 34 patients undergoing PD. Sixteen patients were randomly assigned to receive Octreotide 0.1 cc (100 mcg) three times daily subcutaneously during the first seven days of the post-operative period and the remaining 18 constituted the control group. All patients were fed parenterally until normal oral feeding was restored (mean 8 days). Fisher's exact test was used to compare complications in both groups. Pancreatic fistula was defined as the persistence of an amylase-rich discharge at least 50 ml daily during a minimum period of two weeks.
                The mortality rate was 3% and the morbidity 26%. No significant differences were observed regarding the total number of complications. The appearance of pancreatic fistula was considerably smaller (p = 0.03) in the Octreotide group than in control group. Postoperative hospital stay and the number of subsequent surgical interventions were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the control group.
                Octreotide prevents the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after PD when it is administered prophylactically during the immediate postoperative period. To evaluate prospectively the combination of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog with a somatostatin analog and dexamethasone in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) in a randomized Phase II study. HRPC presents a challenging therapeutic problem. Salvage chemotherapy is the usual approach at this stage of the disease. The combination of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog with a somatostatin analog and dexamethasone has produced objective clinical responses in HRPC.
                Forty patients with HRPC were randomized to receive one of two treatments. Group 1 underwent chemotherapy (estramustine 140 mg three times daily and etoposide 100 mg orally for 21 days) and group 2 the combination of a somatostatin analog (lanreotide 30 mg intramuscularly every 14 days) and dexamethasone (4 mg tapered to 1 mg), in addition to androgen ablation by orchiectomy or a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (triptorelin 3.75 mg intramuscularly every 28 days). The clinical and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, overall survival, time to progression, and toxicity were compared between the two groups.
                The data of 20 patients in group 1 and 18 in group 2 were analyzed. The demographic and clinical data were similar in the two groups at study entry. A PSA response (decrease of greater than 50%) was observed in 45% of group 1 and 44% of group 2. The difference was not statistically significant. A partial clinical response was observed in 29% and 30% of groups 1 and 2, respectively. Again, the difference was not statistically significant. Changes in performance status and pain score during treatment were not significantly different in the two groups. Hematologic toxicity was more frequent in group 1 (80% of patients), and mild diabetes was more frequent in group 2 (22% of patients). The overall survival was 18.8 months in group 1 and 18 months in group 2 (not statistically significant). The time to progression was 6 versus 4 months and, in the PSA responder subgroup, it was 8 versus 7.7 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (neither difference was statistically significant).
                The results of our randomized Phase II study indicated that the new combination treatment (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog, somatostatin analog, and dexamethasone) may be equally effective as salvage chemotherapy in patients with HRPC in terms of the clinical and PSA response, overall survival, and time to progression. A larger prospective Phase III trial is required to confirm our observations. Since previous reports have suggested that somatostatin may be of value in the control of acute variceal haemorrhage, we compared its efficacy with that of injection sclerotherapy in a randomised controlled clinical trial. Eighty consecutive patients with endoscopically-proven severe variceal bleeding were randomised to injection sclerotherapy (n = 41) or somatostatin (n = 39) given as a continuous infusion of 250 micrograms/h for 5 days plus daily bolus administration of 250 micrograms. The efficacy of injection sclerotherapy and somatostatin infusion in controlling haemorrhage and preventing rebleeding (censored at 5 days), mortality (censored at 28 days) and complications was compared. The aetiology of the portal hypertension and transfusion requirements was similar between the two groups, but there were more patients with severe liver disease (Child's C) in the somatostatin group. There was no significant difference between the two treatments in the initial (p = 1.0) or overall control of bleeding (p = 0.58). Furthermore, somatostatin was as effective as injection sclerotherapy in controlling bleeding in patients with severe liver disease or in those actively bleeding at the time of their endoscopy. The relative risk of rebleeding whilst receiving somatostatin compared to injection sclerotherapy was 1.39 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 3.73; 0.52], but this was reduced to 0.98 (95% CI 0.37; 2.67) when readjusted for Child's grading, the only prognostic factor shown to be of significance. Mortality was not significantly different between the two groups of patients (p = 0.31). The relative risk of dying whilst receiving somatostatin compared to injection sclerotherapy was 1.6 (95% CI 3.93; 0.66) but was reduced to 1.03 (95% CI 0.47; 2.47) when adjusted for Child's grading, the only significant prognostic factor. Complications in the somatostatin group were minor and less frequent than after injection sclerotherapy. The results of this study indicate that somatostatin is a safe treatment, which is as effective an endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for acute variceal bleeding. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of low-dose perioperative octreotide on the prevention of complications (pancreatic fistula and general complications) in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery followed by pancreaticojejunostomy. A total of 105 patients were randomized to receive either octreotide 0.1 mg subcutaneously 3 times/day for a total of 7 days or no octreotide. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of a pancreatic fistula and or general complications, including extended length of hospital stay. There were 25 surgical draining procedures performed and 80 duodenopancreatectomies with or without preservation of the pylorus. In all, 25 (23.8%) of the patients were treated for chronic pancreatitis, 8 (7.6%) for benign tumoral disease, and 72 (68.6%) for carcinoma. All patients underwent pancreaticojejunostomy. A placebo-controlled double-blind multicentre study, with randomization into parallel groups, was performed to determine whether perioperative subcutaneous administration of octreotide 0.1 mg every 8 h reduces the rate of complications specifically related to pancreatic surgery. In all, 252 patients were evaluated (153 men, 99 women; mean(s.e.m.) age 53.1(0.8) years) who had pancreatic or periampullary tumour or other duodenal disease (157 patients) or chronic pancreatitis (95) and were undergoing elective pancreatic resection (100 Whipple's procedure, 60 distal resection, 12 others), pancreaticojejunostomy (66) or enucleation of pancreatic lesions (14). The proportion of patients with complications was significantly lower in the group treated with octreotide than in the placebo group (15.6 versus 29.2 per cent, P = 0.01). Octreotide thus appears to reduce substantially the risk of complications related to elective pancreatic surgery. Moreover, treatment acceptability was high. To evaluate the endpoints of complications (specifically pancreatic fistula and total complications) and death in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
                Four randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials from Europe have evaluated prophylactic octreotide (the long-acting synthetic analog of native somatostatin) in patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Each trial reported significant decreases in overall complication rates, and two of the four reported significantly lowered rates of pancreatic fistula in patients receiving prophylactic octreotide. However, none of these four trials studied only pancreaticoduodenal resections, and all trials had high pancreatic fistula rates (>19%) in the placebo group. A fifth randomized trial from the United States evaluated the use of prophylactic octreotide in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy and found no benefit to the use of octreotide. Prophylactic use of octreotide adds more than $75 to the daily hospital charge in the United States. In calendar year 1996, 288 patients received octreotide on the surgical service at the authors' institution, for total billed charges of $74,652.
                Between February 1998 and February 2000, 383 patients were recruited into this study on the basis of preoperative anticipation of pancreaticoduodenal resection. Patients who gave consent were randomized to saline control versus octreotide 250 microg subcutaneously every 8 hours for 7 days, to start 1 to 2 hours before surgery. The primary postoperative endpoints were pancreatic fistula, total complications, death, and length of hospital stay.
                Two hundred eleven patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreatic-enteric anastomosis, received appropriate saline/octreotide doses, and were available for endpoint analysis. The two groups were comparable with respect to demographics (54% male, median age 66 years), type of pancreaticoduodenal resection (60% pylorus-preserving), type of pancreatic-enteric anastomosis (87% end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy), and pathologic diagnosis. The pancreatic fistula rates were 9% in the control group and 11% in the octreotide group. The overall complication rates were 34% in the control group and 40% in the octreotide group; the in-hospital death rates were 0% versus 1%, respectively. The median postoperative length of hospital stay was 9 days in both groups.
                These data demonstrate that the prophylactic use of perioperative octreotide does not reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula or total complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Prophylactic octreotide use in this setting should be eliminated, at a considerable cost savings. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of somatostatin was conducted among 120 patients admitted for bleeding esophageal varices (59 placebo, 61 somatostatin). An initial 250-micrograms bolus of somatostatin followed by a 5-day continuous infusion of 250 micrograms/h and an identical administration of placebo were evaluated for both the control of bleeding and prevention of early rebleeding from varices. Failure to control bleeding occurred in 22 (36%) somatostatin patients vs. 35 (59%) placebo patients, with time to failure occurring earlier with placebo (P = 0.036). blood and plasma transfused per hour during drug infusion of trial drug was reduced in the somatostatin group: median 0.033 vs. 0.105 unit/h (P = 0.025). Use of balloon tamponade was halved in somatostatin-treated patients. The average effect of somatostatin was a 41% reduction in the hazard of failure (95% confidence interval, -1% to 65%, P = 0.0545) after adjustment for the severity of liver disease, which was the only other variable having a significant influence on time to failure. There was no difference in 30-day mortality per admission (7 placebo, 9 somatostatin) or complications. It is concluded that somatostatin is safe and more effective than placebo for the control of variceal bleeding. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial of intravenous somatostatin (Stilamin; Serono Laboratories, Inc., Randolph, MA) was performed in 102 patients with actively bleeding esophageal varices from August, 1985, to November, 1986. Patients had major hemorrhage indicated by hematemesis or melena and evidence of significant blood loss. For entry, patients had to have endoscopic demonstration of active bleeding from esophageal varices or stigmata of recent hemorrhage and bright red blood in the gastric aspirate with no other source of bleeding found. Randomized patients received identical-appearing somatostatin or placebo for a 30-hr study period. Those given somatostatin received a 250-micrograms bolus and a 250-micrograms per hr infusion with repeat bolus and doubling of the infusion if the bleeding was not controlled. In retrospect, 18 patients could not be evaluated. Of the 84 evaluable patients, 48 received somatostatin and 36 placebo. They were comparable in age, gender, severity of liver disease and history of variceal bleeding. Transfusion requirements were similar in both groups. Bleeding stopped for 12 consecutive hr during 30 hr of the study period in 31 (65%) of the somatostatin group vs. 30 (83%) of the placebo group (p = 0.06). The median time to cessation of bleeding was 2 hr in the placebo group and 3 hr in the somatostatin group. Deaths following the study period were nine (25%) in the placebo group and 15 (31%) in the somatostatin group. Within the limitations of the present study, we conclude that somatostatin was ineffective in the management of active bleeding of esophageal varices.
Somatostatin analogues may reduce perioperative complications but do not reduce perioperative mortality. Further adequately powered trials with low risk of bias are necessary. Based on the current available evidence, somatostatin and its analogues are recommended for routine use in people undergoing pancreatic resection.