Randomised, comparative study of three primary dressings for the treatment of venous ulcers. Comparing a foam composite to a hydrocellular foam dressing in the management of venous leg ulcers: a controlled clinical study. Monitoring the microcirculation to evaluate dressing performance in patients with venous leg ulcers. The silver-releasing foam dressing, Contreet Foam, promotes faster healing of critically colonised venous leg ulcers: a randomised, controlled trial. Randomized trial of two foam dressings in the management of chronic venous ulceration. Combination of hydrocolloid dressing and medical compression stockings versus Unna's boot for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Unna's boot vs polyurethane foam dressings for the treatment of venous ulceration. A randomized prospective study. Randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of two bandaging regimens in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.
In this article, we describe a randomised trial in which two established primary dressings - Comfeel (Coloplast, UK) and Granuflex improved formulation (Convatec, UK) - were compared to Cutinova foam (Beiersdorf Medical, UK) in the management of venous leg ulcers. Patients that met the study trial criteria were randomised to receive one of the three primary dressings. All ulcers were secondarily bandaged with Comprilan (Beiersdorf Medical, UK) short-stretch compression. The three dressings were compared in terms of their ability to promote ulcer healing (closure rate and healing rate) and reduce the prevalence and severity of ulcer-associated pain, over a 12-week period. The ease with which dressings could be used in a busy outpatient clinic setting was also considered. On enrollment, groups were well matched in terms of all of the patient and ulcer parameters studies. Six patients were withdrawn for reasons unrelated to study dressings or trial procedures. Following non-parametric analysis of the study data, the three dressings were found to be equally effective at promoting ulcer healing and alleviating ulcer-associated pain. Study personnel rated Cutinova Foam as easy, if not easier, to use than Comfeel or Granuflex. This study suggests that Cutinova Foam is as safe and effective as both Comfeel and Granuflex, in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Venous leg ulcers are the most prevalent form of chronic wounds in the Western world. The principles of moist wound healing coupled with the use of graduated compression bandaging have become the cornerstone of treatment for venous leg ulcers but not all moist dressings are alike. To compare the attributes of a foam composite dressing with those of a hydrocellular foam dressing in the management of venous leg ulcers, a prospective, randomized, comparative 12-week study was conducted in 15 centers in the US, Canada, France, Germany, and the UK. Dressings were changed and compression bandages applied per manufacturer recommendations and dressing performance was assessed at every dressing change and at the final evaluation. Patients with venous ulcers were randomized to treatment for 12 weeks with either hydrocellular foam (n = 52) or foam composite (n = 55) dressing. Healing differences between the groups were not statistically significant, with 36% of patients using foam composite dressing healed in a mean of 66 days and 39% of patients using hydrocellular foam dressing healed in a mean of 73 days. However, the foam composite dressing performed significantly better than the hydrocellular foam dressing with regard to condition of the periwound skin - 55% of patients in the foam composite group having healed or markedly improved surrounding skin compared to 37% of patients using hydrocellular foam (P = 0.03). The foam composite dressing was rated significantly better than the hydrocellular foam dressing ("very good" to "excellent") in level of satisfaction with conformability (87% and 75%, respectively, P = 0.05); being non-sensitizing (73% and 52%, respectively, P = 0.02); and ease of application (93% and 81%, respectively, P = 0.01). The findings reported in this study suggest that the foam composite dressing offers significant improvements in the quality of life of patients with venous leg ulcers as well as for their caregivers. To compare the effect on the microcirculation in venous leg ulcers (VLUs) of two treatment regimens that promote a moist wound environment versus paraffin gauze. The hypothesis is that moist wound dressings are more likely to stimulate the microcirculation and therefore angiogenesis.
                Patients with non-healing VLUs were randomised to receive either a foam dressing (Suprasorb P), a collagen dressing (Suprasorb C) plus the foam dressing, or paraffin gauze (control). All patients wore short-stretch high compression bandages. Parameters used to measure the effects of the treatments on the microcirculation were: TcPO2 measurements, video laser Doppler measurements and the number of capillaries in the wound bed. The progression towards healing was measured by the reduction in ulcer area and formation of granulation tissue. The treatment period was four weeks.
                Significant increases in TcPO2 values were reported between baseline and week 4 for patients receiving the foam dressing only or the collagen plus foam dressing combination (p<0.008 versus p<0.003 respectively). There was also a significant increase in the number of capillaries for the collagen plus foam treatment only (p<0.002).
                This pilot study suggests that a moist wound environment stimulates perfusion of blood and oxygen to the wound tissue, thereby promoting angiogenesis. The collagen and foam dressing combination demonstrated superior results to the control and the foam dressing only. Monitoring the microcirculation may help to assess the effect of dressings on VLU healing, although more research is needed.
                This pilot study was supported by a limited grant from Lohmann & Rauscher GmbH, Germany. The study compared the effect of a sustained silver-release foam dressing (Contreet Foam) with a foam dressing (Allevyn Hydrocellular) without added silver in critically colonised venous leg ulcers with delayed healing. The study was a multicentre, open, randomised, controlled study lasting for 4 weeks. Ulcer area and healing were assessed weekly. Odour, maceration, absorption capacity and leakage were evaluated at dressing changes. All adverse events were recorded. One hundred and twenty-nine patients were included (Contreet Foam: 65, Allevyn Hydrocellular: 64). The two groups were comparable in all respects. After 4 weeks, there was a significantly greater reduction in ulcer area in the Contreet Foam group (45%) than in the Allevyn Hydrocellular group (25%). After 1 and 4 weeks, odour was present in significantly less of the ulcers in the Contreet Foam group (17% and 19%, respectively) compared with the Allevyn Hydrocellular group (47% and 39%, respectively) and at the final visit there were significantly fewer leakages in the Contreet Foam group (19%) compared with the Allevyn Hydrocellular group (49%). Also, less maceration was observed after 1 and 4 weeks in the Contreet Foam group (34% and 37%, respectively) compared with the Allevyn Hydrocellular group (55% and 48%, respectively). The occurrence and cause of adverse events were equally distributed between the study groups. The present study provides evidence of the superior performance of the silver-releasing dressing, Contreet Foam, compared with a traditional moist foam wound healing dressing in the treatment of critically colonised, chronic venous leg ulcers. The results of this randomised, controlled study suggest an important role of sustained silver-releasing dressings in the treatment of critically colonised chronic wounds. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial was undertaken to compare two foam dressings (Allevyn Hydrocellular, Smith & Nephew and Mepilex, Molnlycke Health Care AB) in the management of chronic venous leg ulceration. Patients were also randomized to two compression bandage systems (4-layer vs. cohesive short stretch) as a factorial design. Those with causes of ulceration other than venous disease were excluded. In all, 156 patients met the entry criteria and were randomized from the 12 clinical centers with a median (range) ulcer size of 4.33 (0.33-123.10) cm(2). After 24 weeks a total of 100 (64.1%) patients had complete ulcer closure, 46 (29.5%) had withdrawn from the trial, nine (5.8%) remained unhealed and one patient died. Of the patients randomized to Mepilex, 50/75 (66.7%) had complete ulcer healing compared with 50/81 (61.7%) on Allevyn. The hazard ratio for healing after adjustment for bandage type and trial center was 1.48 (95% C.I. 0.87-2.54, p=0.15), which only marginally changed following adjustment for baseline variables, neither of which achieved statistical significance (p=0.16). Withdrawal rates were similar between groups (23, 30.7% Mepilex vs. 23, 28.4% Allevyn). Pain improved following treatment with both dressings (p<0.001), but with no difference between dressings. Various therapeutic approaches have been developed to manage venous ulcers. In this study the effectiveness of a hydrocolloid dressing (Comfeel Ulcer Dressing) in comparison to the Unna boot, the prototype of rigid bandages, was evaluated.
                Design: Prospective, comparative study.
                University hospital.
                Sixty patients diagnosed with post-thrombotic chronic venous insufficiency with venous ulcers were randomly assigned to two groups of 30 patients. Interventions: In group A, the Unna boot, and in group B, hydrocolloid dressing in addition to the elastic compression were used. Measures: The two groups were compared in terms of 1) complete healing, 2) weekly wound surface reduction, 3) time to complete healing, 4) performance characteristics (ease-of-use score), 5) pain during application and at home, 6) application time.
                The duration of the ulcers was 16.6 +/- 5.8 weeks in group A and 16.9 +/- 6.2 in group B (p >0.05). Previous ulcer recurrence was 74% (20/27 patients) in group A and 73% (19/26 patients) in group B (p >0.05). The initial ulcer size was 6.38 +/- 1.2 cm2 in group A and 6.19 +/- 0.8 cm2 in group B (p >0.05). The complete healing rates were 74.07% (20/27) in group A and 80. 76% (21/26) in group B (p >0.05). The weekly wound surface reductions were 1.28 +/- 0.72 cm2/week and 1.16 +/- 0.38 cm2/week in groups A and B, respectively (p >0.05). The ulcer healing time was 6.85 +/- 3.60 weeks in group A, whereas it was 6.65 +/- 3.31 weeks in group B (p >0.05). Ease-of-use score was 9.04 +/- 2.38 in group A and 17.27 +/- 3.27 in group B and the difference was significant (p <0.0001). A higher degree of pain was reported by the patients who were treated with the Unna boot, both during application (group A 3.69 +/- 1.35, group B 1.88 +/- 1.48, p <0.0001) and at home (group A, 3.27 +/- 1.08, group B, 1.88 +/- 1.11, p <0.0001). The average time spent on Unna boot changes was 150.59 +/- 34.73 min, compared to 134.54 +/- 43.39 min in group B (p >0.05).
                These results demonstrate the superiority of hydrocolloid dressing plus elastic compression treatment in terms of patient convenience. Recent reports have suggested that polyurethane foam dressings provide a more rapid and comfortable healing of venous stasis cutaneous ulcerations than standard semirigid impregnated gauze dressings. This multi-institutional study consists of a randomized, prospective comparison of 36 consecutive patients who were treated with either polyurethane foam dressings (group 1, n = 17) or Unna's boot (group 2, n = 19) for venous ulceration of the lower extremities. Ulcer size ranged from 6.0 to 270 cm2 (mean, 32.2 cm2) for group 1 and 0.2 to 600 cm2 (mean, 76.0 cm2) for group 2. Nine (52.9%) of 17 group 1 patients withdrew from the study due to wound odor, while there was 100% compliance in group 2. Overall wound healing was superior in group 2 (18 [94.7%] of 19) as compared with group 1 (7 [41.2%] of 17) (chi 2 = 8.2). The rate of healing was also better in group 2 (0.5 cm2/d) than in group 1 (0.07 cm2/d). Contrary to published European trials, impregnated gauze dressings exhibited superior treatment results when compared with polyurethane foam dressings in the current study. Many venous ulcers are healed by the application of external compression. It has been suggested that bandages capable of producing greater compression enhance healing. The aim of this study was to compare the time to total healing of venous ulcers in two groups of patients treated with different compression regimens in a randomized prospective trial.
                A total of 112 patients was studied and all were treated with a zinc-impregnated paste bandage applied directly to the ulcer. Fifty-seven patients had the paste covered by Tensopress and 55 by Elastocrepe bandages. Both groups had a tubular bandage applied over the top to retain the bandage in place. All ulcers were stratified and randomized within one of three size groups. The 'venous' aetiology of the ulcer was confirmed on completion by calf pump function tests.
                By 26 weeks, 58 per cent of the patients treated with Tensopress and 62 per cent of those treated with Elastocrepe bandages were healed. The median healing times were 9 and 9.5 weeks respectively. Similar numbers of patients were excluded or withdrawn from both groups. Large ulcers healed significantly more slowly than small ulcers.
                There was no significant improvement in venous ulcer healing using higher compression elastic bandages.
The current evidence base does not suggest that foam dressings are more effective in the healing of venous leg ulcers than other wound dressing treatments. The evidence in this area is of low quality. Further evidence is required from well-designed and rigorously-conducted RCTs, that employ methods to minimise bias and report them clearly, before any definitive conclusions can be made regarding the efficacy of foam dressings in the management of venous leg ulcers.