Results of the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Results of the betaxolol versus placebo treatment trial in ocular hypertension. Influence of carteolol and timolol on IOP an visual fields in glaucoma: a multi-center, double-masked, prospective study. Long-term effects of timolol therapy in ocular hypertension: a double-masked, randomised trial. A 7 year prospective comparative study of three topical beta blockers in the management of primary open angle glaucoma. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Effect of timolol versus pilocarpine on visual field progression in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Longterm effect of topical beta-blockers on intraocular pressure and visual field sensitivity in ocular hypertension and chronic open-angle glaucoma. Comparison of latanoprost monotherapy and combined therapy of 0.5% timolol and 1% dorzolamide in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (CACG) in Japanese patients. A long-term clinical trial of timolol therapy versus no treatment in the management of glaucoma suspects. Timolol treatment prevents or delays glaucomatous visual field loss in individuals with ocular hypertension: a five-year, randomized, double-masked, clinical trial. A comparison of two individual amiodarone regimens to placebo in open heart surgery patients. Interferon alfa-2a is ineffective for patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Pharmacological Therapy for Macular Degeneration Study Group. [A double blind trial of alfacalcidol on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)]. Treatment of downbeat nystagmus with 3,4-diaminopyridine: a placebo-controlled study. A long-term dose-response study of mitomycin in glaucoma filtration surgery. Randomized controlled clinical trial of beta irradiation as an adjunct to trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma. Reduction in incidence of optic nerve disease with annual ivermectin to control onchocerciasis. Double-masked prospective ocular safety study of a lens epithelial cell antibody to prevent posterior capsule opacification. Comparison of the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% + brinzolamide 1% versus dorzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% + latanoprost 0.005%: a 12-week, randomized open-label trial. A comparison of treated and untreated glaucoma suspects. Effect of corticosteroids on intracranial pressure, computed tomographic findings, and clinical outcome in young children with tuberculous meningitis. Dorzolamide versus pilocarpine as adjunctive therapies to timolol: a comparison of patient preference and impact on daily life.
The European Glaucoma Prevention Study (EGPS) seeks to evaluate the efficacy of reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) by dorzolamide in preventing or delaying primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in patients affected by ocular hypertension (OHT).
                Randomized, double-masked, controlled clinical trial.
                One thousand eighty-one patients (age, > or =30 years) were enrolled by 18 European centers. The patients fulfilled a series of inclusion criteria, including: IOP 22 to 29 mmHg; 2 normal and reliable visual fields (on the basis of mean deviation and corrected pattern standard deviation or corrected loss variance of standard 30/II Humphrey or Octopus perimetry); normal optic disc as determined by the Optic Disc Reading Center.
                Patients were randomized to treatment with dorzolamide or placebo (the vehicle of dorzolamide).
                Efficacy end points were visual field, optic disc changes, or both. A visual field change during follow-up had to be confirmed by 2 further positive tests. Optic disc change was defined on the basis of the agreement of 2 of 3 independent observers evaluating optic disc stereo slides. The safety end point was an IOP of more than 35 mmHg on 2 consecutive examinations.
                During the course of the study, the mean percent reduction in IOP in the dorzolamide group was 15% after 6 months and 22% after 5 years. Mean IOP declined by 9% after 6 months and by 19% after 5 years in the placebo group. At 60 months, the cumulative probability of converting to an efficacy end point was 13.4% in the dorzolamide group and 14.1% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.26; P = 0.45). The cumulative probability of developing an efficacy or a safety end point was 13.7% in the dorzolamide group and 16.4% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.51-1.06; P = 0.1).
                Dorzolamide reduced IOP by 15% to 22% throughout the 5 years of the trial. However, the EGPS failed to detect a statistically significant difference between medical therapy and placebo in reducing the incidence of POAG among a large population of OHT patients at moderate risk for developing POAG, because placebo also significantly and consistently lowered IOP. To determine whether treatment with betaxolol can delay or prevent the conversion from ocular hypertension to early glaucoma on the basis of visual field criteria, by means of a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
                Three hundred and fifty-six ocular hypertensives were randomized to treatment with either betaxolol drops or placebo drops during the period 1992-1996. Each patient was followed prospectively with 4-monthly visits. Examination at each visit included visual field testing, intra-ocular pressure (IOP) measurement and optic disc imaging. Conversion to early glaucoma was defined on the basis of visual field change by AGIS criteria. An intent-to-treat analysis compared visual field conversion after 3 years in the treatment and placebo arms. Normal visual field survival analysis was also performed. The IOP characteristics of the two treatment groups were compared.
                Two hundred and fifty-five patients completed the study, which ended in 1998, with a range of follow-up of 2-6 years. Sixteen (13.2%) of 121 patients in the placebo group converted to glaucoma, compared with 12 (9.0%) of 134 patients in the betaxolol group. The intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated no evidence of any difference in conversion rates between the betaxolol and placebo groups after 3 years. Visual field survival analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the betaxolol and placebo groups. The betaxolol-treated group had significantly lower post-treatment IOP values. Converters had significantly higher pre- and post-treatment IOP values than non-converters.
                Betaxolol significantly lowered the IOP level compared with placebo. Conversion to glaucoma was found to be related to both the baseline and post-treatment IOP levels. However the intent-to-treat analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in the conversion rate in the betaxolol-treated group. The influences of Carteolol and Timolol eye drops on intraocular pressure (IOP) and visual fields were compared in a multi-center, double-masked, prospective study. Two-hundred and forty eyes of 120 patients were initially included in the study, and 142 eyes of 72 patients fulfilled all the criteria for final statistical analysis. Both drugs significantly reduced IOP. The visual fields in both treatment groups did not change during one year of treatment. In both groups some patients improved slightly, and others deteriorated slightly. This indicates that locally applied beta-blockers may efficiently stop further progression of visual field defects in cases with increased IOP and early visual field damage. There was no difference between Carteolol and Timolol in this regard. The side effects were minimal, and there were no differences in their frequency or intensity in the two treatment groups. Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) has been shown to be one of the most important risk factors for developing glaucoma. Yet it has not been clearly demonstrated that IOP-lowering treatment can reduce the incidence of glaucoma damage in patients with ocular hypertension. The aim of the current paper was to report the results of a long-term study addressing this very problem.
                We conducted a randomised, double-masked study comparing timolol and placebo treatment in 90 patients with ocular hypertension plus some additional risk factor. Patients were followed at 3-month intervals prospectively for 10 years or until glaucomatous field loss could be demonstrated with computerised perimetry. A post-study analysis was performed including all available data, thus extending maximum follow-up to 17 years.
                After 5 years of follow-up eight patients in the placebo group and five patients in the timolol group had developed glaucomatous field loss (NS); the corresponding figures after 10 years were 15 patients in the placebo group and seven patients in the timolol group. Survival analysis showed a tendency but no statistically significant difference between treatment groups (P = 0.07). Study attrition was large. Eighteen patients in each group had developed glaucomatous field loss when also post-study data were included. IOP reduction was greater in eyes passing the 10-year visit without field loss (5.7 mmHg), than in those that reached an end-point (2.3 mmHg; P = 0.0002).
                In this long-term study we found a tendency but failed to prove a beneficial effect of topical timolol treatment in patients with elevated IOP, normal visual fields and some additional risk factor. The intent-to-treat analysis showed no difference between treatment groups. The high attrition shows the difficulties associated with very long follow-up. To determine the long term efficacy of monotherapy with topically applied beta blocking agents and to determine whether selective beta blockers were able to preserve the visual field more effectively than non-selective agents.
                A prospective randomised, open, comparative study of three topically applied beta blockers-timolol, betaxolol, and carteolol-was carried out on 153 patients (280 eyes) with newly diagnosed open angle glaucoma. Those patients who were not withdrawn were followed by the same observers for a minimum of 2 years and a maximum of 7 years, with clinical observations, Goldmann tonometry and 24.2 Humphrey visual field analysis.
                All three drugs lowered the IOP significantly from untreated levels but betaxolol took up to 12 months in some instances to reach the maximum pressure reduction. After 7 years only 43% of the eyes begun on timolol, 34% of those started on carteolol, and 29% of those on betaxolol were still being treated with these medications alone. Visual fields were analysed throughout the trial by CPSD and MD and at the end by linear regression analysis (PROGRESSOR). The visual fields remained the same without apparent improvement or deterioration throughout the period of follow up. Eight patients (11 eyes) were withdrawn because of continuing field loss in spite of reduction in IOP (six using carteolol and five using betaxolol).
                Analysis shows that less than half the eyes initially treated with topical beta blockers might be expected to still be being treated with their original medication after 5 years. The rest required either additional medication or trabeculectomy. There was no statistically significant improvement or deterioration in the visual fields over a 7 year period. On the evidence of this trial there are no particular advantages in using selective beta blockers. Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is one of the leading causes of blindness in the United States and worldwide. Three to 6 million people in the United States are at increased risk for developing POAG because of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), or ocular hypertension. There is no consensus on the efficacy of medical treatment in delaying or preventing the onset of POAG in individuals with elevated IOP. Therefore, we designed a randomized clinical trial, the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.
                To determine the safety and efficacy of topical ocular hypotensive medication in delaying or preventing the onset of POAG.
                A total of 1636 participants with no evidence of glaucomatous damage, aged 40 to 80 years, and with an IOP between 24 mm Hg and 32 mm Hg in one eye and between 21 mm Hg and 32 mm Hg in the other eye were randomized to either observation or treatment with commercially available topical ocular hypotensive medication. The goal in the medication group was to reduce the IOP by 20% or more and to reach an IOP of 24 mm Hg or less.
                The primary outcome was the development of reproducible visual field abnormality or reproducible optic disc deterioration attributed to POAG. Abnormalities were determined by masked certified readers at the reading centers, and attribution to POAG was decided by the masked Endpoint Committee.
                During the course of the study, the mean +/- SD reduction in IOP in the medication group was 22.5% +/- 9.9%. The IOP declined by 4.0% +/- 11.6% in the observation group. At 60 months, the cumulative probability of developing POAG was 4.4% in the medication group and 9.5% in the observation group (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.59; P<.0001). There was little evidence of increased systemic or ocular risk associated with ocular hypotensive medication.
                Topical ocular hypotensive medication was effective in delaying or preventing the onset of POAG in individuals with elevated IOP. Although this does not imply that all patients with borderline or elevated IOP should receive medication, clinicians should consider initiating treatment for individuals with ocular hypertension who are at moderate or high risk for developing POAG. Relatively few studies have been conducted linking decreasing intraocular pressure (IOP) to preservation of visual field. This investigation was conducted to determine if this link could be made and to compare the long-term effect of two ocular hypotensive agents on preservation of visual field.
                In an observer-masked study, 189 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma received either timolol or pilocarpine by random allocation. The dose of antiglaucoma agent was increased from 0.25% to 0.5% twice daily for timolol or from 2% to 4% four times daily for pilocarpine if the initial IOP response was inadequate. After an on-treatment baseline, visual fields were followed every 4 months for 2 years using the Octopus program 32.
                Compared with timolol, significantly more patients receiving pilocarpine discontinued use because of inadequate IOP control (P < or = 0.01). By comparing the mean visual field scores, it can be seen that the pilocarpine group had a significantly worse score at all timepoints from month 4 to month 24. The pilocarpine group also had a greater mean number of test loci with decreased sensitivity of 5 or more decibels (dB) at all timepoints. The mean within-patient regression slope for timolol was 0.01 dB/month and for pilocarpine was -0.06 dB/month (P < 0.01). The study has shown that over a 2-year period, patients treated with pilocarpine 2% or 4% four times daily experienced a significantly greater visual field deterioration than that seen in patients receiving either 0.25% or 0.5% timolol twice daily.
                Although these data do not support a link between lowering of IOP and visual field preservation, treatment with timolol was associated with significantly less visual field loss than treatment with pilocarpine. In a prospective, randomized study, nineteen patients with ocular hypertension (n = 14) or chronic open-angle glaucoma (n = 5) were treated with either betaxolol 0.5% or timolol 0.5% in both eyes twice daily. Visual field sensitivity and intraocular pressure were assessed with the Octopus perimeter (program G1) and applanation tonometry, respectively, at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months during treatment. Four of the nineteen patients (two timolol-treated and two betaxolol-treated) were lost to follow-up after the 36-month examination. Whereas both drugs reduced the intraocular pressure, the decrease in the timolol-treated group was statistically more pronounced than in the betaxolol-treated group at month 3, 6, and 48 (p < 0.03). In both treatment groups, the visual field mean sensitivity (MS) index decreased slightly during the first six months of treatment, but remained so only in the timolol-treated group at all subsequent examinations. In the betaxolol-treated group, there was a statistically significant increase in MS at the 12, 24, 36, and 48 month visits (p < 0.01). These findings suggest that factors other than IOP alone may determine visual field outcome. To compare the efficacy, adverse effects, and patient compliance of latanoprost monotherapy with unfixed combination therapy with 0.5% timolol maleate and 1% dorzolamide in the treatment of chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (CACG), 36 Japanese patients with CACG following laser iridotomy (LPI) were treated for 12 weeks with instillation of latanoprost alone or with unfixed combination therapy of 0.5% timolol maleate and 1% dorzolamide hydrochloride. After 12 weeks of treatment, latanoprost reduced intraocular pressure (IOP) from 22.2 +/- 2.0 mmHg to 14.8 +/- 1.9 mmHg (33% reduction); timolol maleate and dorzolamide hydrochloride also reduced IOP from 22.5 +/- 2.2 mmHg to 17.1 +/- 2.7 mmHg (24% reduction). Latanoprost monotherapy significantly lowered IOP compared with unfixed combination therapy of 0.5% timolol maleate and 1% dorzolamide hydrochloride. Furthermore, a systemic adverse effect of bradycardia was not observed in the latanoprost monotherapy group. Concerning compliance, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. Thus, latanoprost monotherapy is more effective than unfixed combination therapy with 0.5% timolol maleate and 1% dorzolamide in the treatment of CACG following relief of pupillary block in Japanese patients. One hundred seven patients with intraocular pressures (IOPs) between 22 and 28 mmHg with normal visual fields on Goldmann perimetry and without evidence of optic nerve damage were randomly assigned to either a timolol treatment (TT) or a no treatment (NT) arm in a prospective clinical trial. The patients were followed for an average of 56 and 51 months, respectively. Criteria for failure were a confirmed IOP of greater than 32 mmHg, stereophotographically documented optic nerve progression, or development of glaucomatous visual field loss by Goldmann or Octopus perimetry. Nine patients failed in the TT group and 17 in the NT group (P = 0.07). Of the nine TT group failures, six had discontinued timolol before failure (4 for greater than 6 months). In a Cox proportional hazards analysis controlling for confounding variables, timolol was found to be significantly protective with an adjusted risk ratio of 0.38 (95% confidence interval = 0.16-0.89, P = 0.03). When only field and disc failure criteria were considered, timolol treatment was found to be significantly protective in an analysis considering patients who stopped timolol as being lost to follow-up (P = 0.05). A higher tonographic facility of outflow was protective in all analyses. A trend toward a substantial loss of effectiveness of timolol on IOP was not observed. Seasonal fluctuations in IOP were observed (P = 0.0007), with higher IOP occurring in the winter. The results demonstrate a favorable influence of timolol therapy on the clinical course of patients with mildly elevated IOP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) A 5-year, randomized, double-masked, clinical trial was conducted to determine whether treatment with topical timolol maleate was effective in preventing or delaying the onset of glaucomatous visual field loss in subjects with ocular hypertension. Sixty-five individuals considered to be at moderate risk for developing open-angle glaucoma were recruited for the study. In each patient, one eye was chosen randomly to receive timolol twice-daily while the fellow eye received diluent (placebo). Timolol administration reduced IOP from baseline in the treated eyes over the course of the study by a mean +/- SD of 4.9 +/- 3.4 mm Hg. Timolol administration also produced a mean +/- SD contralateral reduction of IOP from baseline in the untreated fellow eyes of 2.9 +/- 3.1 mm Hg. The mean +/- SD difference in IOP between the treated and untreated eyes during the study was 2.3 +/- 2.6 mm Hg. Over the course of the study reproducible visual field loss developed in 4 timolol treated eyes and 10 placebo treated eyes (P = .039, McNemar test). Clinical progressive optic disc cupping was noted in four treated and eight untreated eyes (P = .11, McNemar test). In the 42 subjects who completed a minimum 4-year follow-up, baseline and final optic disc photographs were analyzed using a computer image analysis system to determine changes in the area of disc pallor. The mean +/- SD increase in optic disc pallor was 0.86% +/- 2.4% in the timolol treated eyes and 1.80% +/- 3.6% in the placebo treated eyes. This difference was statistically significant (P = .04, paired t-test). This study provides evidence that medical treatment prevents or delays the onset of glaucomatous visual field loss and optic disc damage in individuals with ocular hypertension. The magnitude of the protective effect of timolol was partially obscured by the contralateral reduction of IOP in the placebo treated fellow eyes. This study compares the ability of two oral amiodarone regimens to reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) as compared with the placebo among elderly open heart surgery (OHS) patients receiving beta blockade.
                This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 220 patients undergoing OHS. Patients (average age, 73 years) received 7 g of oral amiodarone more than 10 days starting 5 days before OHS (slow load; n = 56), a 6 g oral amiodarone regimen more than 6 days starting 1 day before OHS (fast load; n = 64), or matching placebo in one of the two previously mentioned regimens (n = 100).
                Patients receiving the slow load amiodarone regimen had a significant reduction in the risk of AF (48.4%; p = 0.013), AF lasting more than 24 hours (76.5%; p = 0.003), symptomatic AF (90.0%; p = 0.002), and recurrent AF (64.5%; p = 0.025) as compared with the placebo. Patients receiving the fast load amiodarone regimen had significant reductions in the risk of AF lasting more than 24 hours (52.6%; p = 0.038) and symptomatic AF (65.0%; p = 0.024), but the incidence of any AF or any recurrence of AF only showed a trend toward significance (34.0% and 45.5%; p = 0.054 and 0.09, respectively).
                Oral amiodarone in a slow loading regimen provides significant suppression of all AF factors and can be used when a patient has started it at least 5 days before OHS. If a patient has less than 5 days before OHS, the fast loading regimen is an efficacious alternative as it provides significant benefits in preventing AF from lasting more than 24 hours and for preventing symptomatic AF. Both regimens were well tolerated and safe in elderly patients receiving beta blockade according to the hospital's standard protocol. Interferon alfa-2a has been shown to be effective as an antiangiogenic agent for several systemic human angiogenic disorders and has shown antiangiogenic activity in the laboratory.
                To evaluate the safety and efficacy of interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration.
                A randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel, multicenter double-blind trial was performed at 45 ophthalmic centers worldwide. Four hundred eighty-one patients were randomly assigned to 4 treatment groups: placebo or interferon alfa-2a (Roferon-A), 1.5, 3.0, or 6.0 million international units (MIU). Visual acuity testing, clinical examination, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography were evaluated, with the primary end point being a comparison of the number of patients who experienced a loss of 3 lines or more of vision at 1 year.
                At 52 weeks, 40 (38%; 95% confidence interval, 29%-48%) of 105 placebo-treated patients had lost at least 3 lines of vision (with 12% unavailable for follow-up), compared with 142 (50%; 95% confidence interval, 44%-55%) of 286 in the 3 active treatment groups combined. The difference in proportions was not statistically significant. However, a pairwise comparison of these proportions for the placebo group vs the group that received interferon alfa-2a, 6 MIU (with 26% unavailable for follow-up), showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the placebo group (P = .02) and a nearly significant difference for the placebo vs the 1.5-MIU group (P = .05) (with 16% unavailable for follow-up), again favoring the placebo group. The 3-MIU group (with 22% unavailable for follow-up) did not show a statistically significant difference in pairwise comparison (P = .48), suggesting that a dose-response relationship was not evident.
                Interferon alfa-2a provides no benefit as a treatment for choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration and may be associated with a poorer visual outcome when given at a dose of 6 MIU. However, the absence of a clear dose-response relationship raises the possibility that the observed differences result from chance. A double blind comparative trial was performed in order to study the efficacy and safety of alfacalcidol (1 alpha-OH-D3) in a total of 140 patients with RA admitted to 31 institutes, using a placebo as the control. The treatment period was 16 weeks. The doses of 1 alpha-OH-D3 were 1.0 microgram/day and 2.0 micrograms/day. It was permissible to use non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs for basic treatment and oral steroidal preparations for maintenance treatment without changing the doses of these drugs during the study period in patients who had been treated with them before participating in the study (for oral steroidal preparations, the dose was limited to 5 mg/day or less as prednisolone). The percentage of patients with slight improvement was about 10% higher in 1 alpha-OH-D3 groups than in placebo group, but the difference between them was not significant. The results tended to be better in the treated groups than in the placebo group, but there was no significant difference between them with regard to duration of morning stiffness, number of joints with pain, number of joints with swelling and Lansbury's index. The effects of 1 alpha-OH-D3 on various immunological parameters including lymphocyte subsets were not clearly demonstrated. However, interestingly, the ratio of OKT-4/OKT-8 was found not to change in patients whose initial value was normal, while it tended to decrease after 1 alpha-OH-D3 treatment in patients whose initial value was abnormally high. The improvement of bone atrophy was judged by microdensitometry (MD) method using X-ray picture of hands. The indexes of bone density (GS max, GS min and sigma GS/D) demonstrated that 1 alpha-OH-D3 prevents reduction in bone density. 1 alpha-OH-D3 did not trigger hypercalcemia in any case. However there was a slight but significant increase of serum Ca value in the group with higher dose (2.0 micrograms/day). Taking the efficacy into consideration, the dose of 1.0 microgram/day was judged to be suitable for long-term treatment. Several drugs that primarily act on gamma-aminobutyrate or muscarinic receptors have been used to treat downbeat nystagmus (DBN) syndrome despite their having only moderate success and causing several side effects that limit their effectiveness. These drugs were tested under the assumption that DBN was caused by a disinhibition of a physiologic inhibitory cerebellar input on vestibular nuclei.
                To evaluate the effects of a single dose of the potassium channel blocker 3,4-diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP), which is known to increase the excitability of Purkinje cells, on DBN in a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind study with a crossover design.
                Seventeen patients with DBN due to cerebellar atrophy (5), infarction (3), Arnold-Chiari malformation (1), or unknown etiology (8) were included in the study (1 of 18 patients had to be excluded). Mean peak slow-phase velocity (PSPV) was measured before and 30 minutes after randomized ingestion of 20 mg of 3,4-DAP or placebo orally; at least 1 week later, the treatments were switched.
                3,4-DAP reduced mean PSPV of DBN from 7.2 +/- 4.2 degrees /s (mean +/- SD) before treatment to 3.1 +/- 2.5 degrees/s 30 minutes after ingestion of the 3,4-DAP (p < 0.001, two-way analysis of variance). Placebo had no measurable effect. In 10 of 17 subjects, the mean PSPV decreased by >50% and in 12 of 17 by >40%. In parallel, the subjects had less oscillopsia and felt more stable while standing and walking. Nine of the subjects continued to take the drug with success. Except for transient minor perioral or digital paresthesia reported by three subjects and nausea and headache reported by one, no other side effects were observed.
                In this study, the authors demonstrated that a single dose of 3,4-DAP significantly improved DBN. In view of animal studies reporting that micromolar concentrations of 4-aminopyridine increased the excitability of Purkinje cells, it is suggested that the efficacy of 3,4-DAP may be due to an increase of the physiologic inhibitory influence of the vestibulocerebellum on the vestibular nuclei. To establish the long-term, dose-response relationship between the concentration of and duration of exposure to mitomycin to a decrease in intraocular pressure (IOP) and fewer complications.
                We performed a prospective double-masked, placebo-controlled, 1-year study evaluating the decrease in IOP and fewer complications of fornix-based trabeculectomy surgery in 300 eyes equally divided among therapy with placebo; mitomycin, 0.2 mg/ mL, applied for 2 minutes; mitomycin, 0.4 mg/mL, applied for 4 minutes; or mitomycin, 0.4 mg/mL, applied for 2 minutes. All of the eyes had vertical and horizontal cup-disc ratios greater than 0.7.
                We observed significant treatment-related differences in IOP, with a decrease in IOP in all 3 mitomycin-treated groups for all of the times beyond 1 month. The number of eyes achieving strict IOP control and the development of cataract suggest a possible dose-response effect for concentration and time of exposure. Progressive lens opacification was the most frequent complication in 54 eyes (18.1%). The incidence of progressive lens changes markedly increased in subjects receiving 4 minutes of mitomycin therapy. Cataract formation was unrelated to IOP. Other complications were rare. Macular folds developed in 6 patients, with visual acuity returning to better than 20/40 in all but 1 patient.
                A possible dose-response relationship seemed to exist between the concentration of and duration of exposure to mitomycin. Length of exposure seems to be more important than concentration. The benefits of additional decreases in IOP must be weighed against the potential for increases in the risk of complications. To assess the effect of a single intraoperative application of 750 cGy of beta irradiation on the outcome of trabeculectomy for uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma.
                A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
                Sixty-one eyes of 61 Caucasian patients at low risk of filtering surgery failure, with poorly controlled primary or secondary open-angle glaucoma undergoing routine trabeculectomy.
                Patients were randomly assigned to control or beta irradiation groups. All patients underwent standard trabeculectomy with fornix-based conjunctival incision. Eyes assigned to beta irradiation received 750 cGy of beta irradiation directly over the sclerostomy site on completion of conjunctival suturing. An identical but inactive applicator was applied to control eyes, delivering no radiation. Both operator and patient remained masked to the assignment for the 12-month follow-up period.
                The main outcome measure was intraocular pressure (IOP) control. Complete success of IOP control was defined as an IOP less than 21 mmHg at 12 months without need for additional medication. Qualified success was defined as an IOP less than 21 mmHg at 12 months where additional medication was required.
                Complete success of IOP control was achieved in 19 (86%) control eyes and 35 (90%) irradiated eyes (P = 1.0). Qualified success of IOP control was achieved in 21 (95%) control eyes and 39 (100%) irradiated eyes at 12 months follow-up (P = 1.0)
                We experienced a very high success rate of filtration surgery in this select population without adjunctive irradiation. Our sample size was too small to show any improvement in success with use of beta irradiation in this group. Other studies would have to be done to determine whether it may have measurable benefit in cases with a high risk of filtration failure. The safety and efficacy of ivermectin in the prevention of blindness from onchocerciasis have been established in many studies that have addressed the drug's effects on the front of the eye. We undertook a study with sufficient statistical power to detect an effect on optic nerve disease (OND), probably the main cause of blindness in the disorder. The trial was based in 34 mesoendemic communities in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Villagers aged 5 years and older were randomly assigned annual dosing with ivermectin or placebo for 3 years. Participants underwent medical and ophthalmological examinations before the first, third, and fourth treatments. 3522 villagers aged 15 and older were re-examined at least once. Skin-snip samples were taken at baseline for calculation of microfilarial load. The outcome measure was development of disc pallor accompanied by objective evidence of deterioration in visual function; 116 subjects (45 ivermectin-treated, 71 placebo-treated) showed such changes during the trial. The incidence rate ratio (ivermectin vs placebo) was 0.90 (95% CI 0.54-1.51) for subjects with loads of 0-10 mf (microfilariae) per mg skin and 0.52 (0.29-0.93) for subjects with more than 10 mf/mg. The incidence rate ratio varied little when account was taken of age, sex, presence of pre-existing disc pallor in one eye, previous use of diethylcarbamazine citrate, or doses of ivermectin or placebo received. There was evidence that ivermectin reduced the incidence of OND in subjects with microfilarial loads above 10 mf/mg but had little effect in those with lower loads. Sustained annual delivery of ivermectin could prevent a substantial proportion of onchocercal blindness in mesoendemic communities. To evaluate the intraocular safety of an immunoconjugate (MDX-RA) developed to prevent posterior capsule opacification (PCO) in human eyes.
                St. Thomas's Hospital Eye Department, London, United Kingdom.
                Twenty-six patients had phacoemulsification and implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL). All were randomly allocated at the end of surgery to receive a 0.1 mL placebo or 0.1 mL of the immunotoxin MDX-RA intracamerally. Two doses of the drug were tested: 8 patients with a low dose (50 units), 9 patients with a high dose (100 units), and 9 with placebo. Follow-up at days 1, 14, 30, 60, 90, and 180 consisted of visual acuity measured by the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study test, contrast sensitivity, aqueous flare, specular microscopy of the IOL's anterior surface, and corneal endothelial counts. The percentage area of PCO was measured from retroillumination images of the posterior capsule.
                There was no decrease in corneal endothelial cell count in toxin-treated patients. Early postoperative flare, anterior chamber cell count, and corneal pachymetry were higher in toxin-treated patients. The median percentage area of PCO at 1 year was 32.0 in the placebo group, 3.8 in the low-dose group, and 7.4 in the high-dose group (P = .06).
                This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial confirmed that MDX-RA is safe for intraocular use and is of potential value for further clinical trials of the prevention of PCO. To compare the safety and effectiveness of fixed-combination regimes (latanoprost- timolol and brinzolamide 1% compared to dorzolamide 1%/timolol and latanoprost) in open-angle glaucoma patients after switching from a combination of three topical antiglaucoma eye drops.
                We conducted an open, randomized 12-week multicenter prospective study. We randomly allocated 39 patients who had been treated with three antiglaucoma eye drops (prostaglandin F(2α) analogues plus beta-blockers and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors) into two groups. Group A (n = 20) were treated with latanoprost-timolol and brinzolamide 1% therapy and Group B (n = 16) were treated with dorzolamide 1%/timolol and latanoprost. Thirty-six patients completed all 12 weeks of this study. The major clinical parameters measured were intraocular pressure (IOP), conjunctive hyperemia, superficial punctate keratopathy and hyperpigmentation of eyelid at baseline, 4, and 12 weeks. Additionally noted were adverse events and patient preferences, measured using a questionnaire at study initiation and at 12 weeks.
                AT BASELINE, IOPS WERE (GROUP A: 14.1 ± 2.9 mmHg, B: 14.5 ± 2.9 mmHg; P = 0.658), (Group A: 13.8 ± 2.6 mmHg, B: 14.3 ± 2.8 mmHg; P = 0.715) at 4 weeks, and (Group A: 14.1 ± 2.7 mmHg, B: 14.2 ± 2.7 mmHg; P = 0.538) at 12 weeks. Among the groups, there was no significant difference at any time point after baseline (P = 0.923, 0.951, respectively). All adverse events were not remarkably different after therapy. In regards to patient preference before and after switching therapy, 10 patients (50%) in Group A and 10 patients (63%) in Group B preferred using fixed-combination eye drop therapy.
                Effectiveness and safety were maintained in both groups after switching therapy. Overall, patients generally preferred using a fixed-combination therapy. One hundred forty-three patients with intraocular pressures (IOPs) above 22 mmHg and without visual field defects or any obvious evidence of optic nerve damage were randomly assigned to either a timolol treatment group or no treatment in a 6-year prospective clinical trial. Endpoints were defined as reproducible visual field defects on automatic perimetry, disc hemorrhages, or stereophotographically documented optic nerve head changes. Endpoints developed in 42 patients: 28 visual field defects, 8 changes in disc appearance, and 6 disc hemorrhages. Of the 42 patients, 20 were treated and 22 were not. Survival analysis showed no statistically significant differences in failure time to any endpoints between the two groups. In the untreated group, the time to failure of disc change was related to the mean IOP during the study and also to the changes in the IOP from baseline. A significant correlation was found between initial cup-to-disc ratio and survival time to visual field defects in the untreated group. To study the effect of highdose prednisone on intracranial pressure (ICP), cranial computed tomographic (CT) findings, and clinical outcome in young children with moderate to severe tuberculous meningitis (TBM).
                Prospective, controlled, randomized study.
                Continuous lumbar, cerebrospinal fluid pressure monitoring and contrasted CT scanning were performed in 141 consecutive children with TBM at admission. All children were then randomly allocated to a nonsteroid group (71 children) or a steroid group (70 children) who received prednisone (first 16 children, 2 mg/kg per day; next 54 children, 4 mg/kg per day) for the first month of treatment. ICP monitoring and CT scanning were repeated regularly, and clinical outcome was assessed after 6 months of antituberculosis treatment.
                No statistically significant difference in ICP or the degree of hydrocephalus (as demonstrated by CT scan) was found between the steroid and nonsteroid groups after the first month of treatment. Basal ganglia infarcts developed in 16% of children in the steroid group and 24% in the nonsteroid group during the first month of treatment. Neither this incidence nor the eventual size of infarcts present at admission differed significantly between the two treatment groups. Single or multiple tuberculomas were seen on the first CT scans of 7 children (5%), whereas tuberculomas developed in 11 children (8%) at treatment. Both the response of the tuberculomas to treatment and the incidence of new tuberculomas were significantly improved by steroid therapy. Basal enhancement was also significantly less in the steroid group after 1 month of treatment. Steroids lowered mortality in stage III TBM significantly. Similarly, more surviving children in the steroid group had IQs of greater than 75 than did the those in the nonsteroid group. No significant difference was found in the incidence of motor deficit, blindness, or deafness.
                Corticosteroids significantly improved the survival rate and intellectual outcome of children with TBM. Enhanced resolution of the basal exudate and tuberculomas by steroids was shown by serial CT scanning. Corticosteroids did not affect ICP or the incidence of basal ganglia infarction significantly. The purpose of this study was to compare 2% dorzolamide three times daily with 2% pilocarpine four times daily to determine patient preference, tolerability, and impact on daily life in patients concurrently receiving 0.5% timolol twice daily for treatment of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Seventy-five patients were enrolled in this 4-week, randomized, two-period, crossover study. The Comparison of Ophthalmic Medications for Tolerability questionnaire was used to assess patient preference and perception of side effects and activity limitations resulting from the study medications. IOP measurements were obtained 2 hours after drops were instilled and visual field tests were performed at baseline and at the end of each crossover period. Significantly more patients receiving pilocarpine than dorzolamide reported adverse experiences and discontinued the drug because of these adverse experiences. Similarly, patients reported more interference with their daily life because of side effects and activity limitations when receiving pilocarpine. Vision difficulties, accommodation difficulties, and brow ache were reported more often and were considered more bothersome by patients receiving pilocarpine. Bitter/unusual taste was reported more frequently and was considered more bothersome by patients receiving dorzolamide. Patients also reported missing fewer doses and were more satisfied with their medication when receiving dorzolamide. All of these changes were considered statistically significant. IOP control was not significantly different with either dorzolamide or pilocarpine. However, patients experienced a significant worsening of the mean defect of automated visual field examinations when receiving pilocarpine. At the end of the study, among patients with a preference, dorzolamide was preferred to pilocarpine by a ratio of more than 9:1. Overall, 81.9% of patients preferred dorzolamide. Thus dorzolamide demonstrated better tolerability and less adverse impact on daily life than pilocarpine.
The results of this review support the current practice of IOP lowering treatment of OHT. A visual field protective effect has been clearly demonstrated for medical IOP lowering treatment. Positive but weak evidence for a beneficial effect of the class of beta-blockers has been shown. 
Direct comparisons of prostaglandins or brimonidine to placebo are not available and the comparison of dorzolamide to placebo failed to demonstrate a protective effect. However, absence of data or failure to prove effectiveness should not be interpreted as proof of absence of any effect. The decision to treat a patient or not, as well as the decision regarding the drug with which to start treatment, should remain individualised, taking in to account the amount of damage, the level of IOP, age and other patient characteristics.