Sublingual misoprostol before first trimester abortion: a comparative study using two dose regimens. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary. Prostaglandin E2 gel versus misoprostol for cervical ripening in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 34 weeks. Cervical priming with sublingual misoprostol vs. 15-methyl-prostaglandin F2alpha prior to surgical abortion. Intravaginal misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent. Second-trimester uterine evacuation: A comparison of intra-amniotic (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F2alpha and intravaginal misoprostol. Second-trimester pregnancy termination: comparison of three different methods. The abortifacient effect of misoprostol in the second trimester. A randomized comparison with gemeprost in patients pre-treated with mifepristone (RU486). A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce labor. Second-trimester termination of pregnancy by extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha or endocervical misoprostol. A comparative study. A randomized comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before suction termination of first-trimester pregnancy. The use of misoprostol for mid-trimester therapeutic termination of pregnancy. Randomized controlled trial of misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination associated with fetal malformation. A randomized controlled comparison of sublingual and vaginal administration of misoprostol for cervical priming before first-trimester surgical abortion. Comparison of vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for second trimester abortion: randomized controlled equivalence trial. Induction of abortion in the second trimester by a combination of misoprostol and mifepristone: a randomized comparison between two misoprostol regimens. Influence of misoprostol or prostaglandin E(2) for induction of labor on the incidence of pathological CTG tracing: a randomized trial. Cervical ripening with oral misoprostol at term. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction]. A randomised trial of oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol for the purpose of mid-trimester termination of pregnancy. A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction. Preinduction cervical ripening with intravaginal prostaglandin E1 methyl analogue misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial. Sublingual misoprostol for preabortion cervical ripening in first-trimester pregnancy termination. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol with prostaglandin E2 for termination of second-trimester pregnancy. A randomized study comparing the use of sublingual to vaginal misoprostol for pre-operative cervical priming prior to surgical termination of pregnancy in the first trimester. Randomized comparison of vaginal (200 microg every 3 h) and oral (400 microg every 3 h) misoprostol when combined with mifepristone in termination of second trimester pregnancy. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol (400 microg) for cervical priming in first-trimester abortion: a randomized trial. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction. Oral misoprostol vs. intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial. No benefit, but increased harm from high dose (100 microg) misoprostol for induction of labour: a randomised trial of high vs. low (50 microg) dose misoprostol. Oral versus self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home before surgical termination of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.
Various methods have been described for preoperative cervical priming prior to vacuum aspiration (VA) in first trimester pregnancy termination, to facilitate cervical dilatation and shorten the abortion procedure. Recently misoprostol a prostaglandin E1 analogue has been shown to be effective in facilitating cervical dilatation prior to VA. Misoprostol offers several advantages over the other prostagland in analogues including stability at room temperature, ease of administration and minimal side effects.
                To determine the optimal dosage and dosing interval for the use of misoprostol administered sublingually for pre-abortion cervical dilatation.
                This was a prospective randomised study conducted at Comprehensive Rural Health Project, Ballabgarh the rural health centre under Centre for Community Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi.
                One hundred and twenty pregnant women between 6-11 weeks of gestation opting for voluntary medical termination of pregnancy were (MTP) randomly allocated to either 200 microg or the 400 microg misoprostol group. Vacuum aspiration was performed either two or three hours after administration of sublingual misoprostol. Using Hegar's dilators, degree of cervical dilatation before vacuum aspiration was measured. Other parameters assessed included the amount of additional dilatation required, intra-operative blood loss and associated side effects.
                Statistical analysis was conducted using chisquare, the student's t and the Mann-Whitney U tests to examine the difference between the two groups.
                In the 200 microg misoprostol group 33% achieved a dilatation of > or = 8 mm compared with 71% of women in the 400 microg misoprostol group. The odds ratio was 95.8 (95% CI 10.2-842.9) for 400 microg misoprostol for successful preoperative cervical dilatation of > or = 8 mm. The mean baseline cervical dilatation for 400 microg and 200 microg misoprostol was 8.2 mm and 6.0 mm respectively (P < 0.001). The use of 400 mg misoprostol with an evacuation interval of two hours appears to be the optimal dosage and evacuation interval. Increasing the time interval beyond two hours did not confer any additional advantage on the rate of successful cervical dilatation but was instead associated with an increased incidence of side effects such as preoperative vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain and shivering.
                Our study has shown that Sublingual administration of 400 microg of misoprostol at least two hours before procedure is effective for preoperative cervical dilatation before vacuum aspiration in first trimester pregnancy termination. There is no additional advantages of increasing the dosing interval upto three hours. We compared the efficacy of misoprostol with that of prostaglandin E2 in cervical ripening and labour induction. Thus 238 women with rupture of membranes beyond 36 weeks gestation without labour were randomized to receive 50 microg misoprostol vaginal gel or 5 mg of prostaglandin E2 gel. Bishop score was evaluated before drug application and 6 hours later. Clinical data and perinatal outcome were recorded. Mean time from induction to delivery and the need for oxytocin were significantly less in the misoprostol group. There were no significant differences in spontaneous labour rate, type of delivery and perinatal outcome. It is concluded that intravaginal misoprostol is safe and more effective than prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening in premature rupture of membranes beyond 36 weeks gestation. To compare labour outcome in women who had labour induced with PGF2 alpha gel, PGE2 vaginal pessary or misoprostol administered intravaginally or orally.
                Unmasked randomised controlled trial.
                Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zimbabwe, Harare.
                Women with a singleton foetus in cephalic presentation after 37 weeks gestation admitted for induction of labour who were randomised to prostaglandin F2 alpha gel (n = 76), prostaglandin E2 pessary (n = 75) and misoprostol administered either intra-vaginally (n = 128) or orally (n = 127).
                Primary outcome was induction to delivery interval. Secondary outcomes included use of oxytocin during labour, mode of delivery, duration of labour, neonatal condition at delivery and maternal complications.
                Four hundred and six women admitted for induction of labour with a singleton foetus in cephalic presentation after 37 weeks gestation were enrolled. To estimate the risk with induction using other agents the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval was calculated using the group that received prostaglandin F2 alpha gel as referents.
                The women were comparable for baseline characteristics. Compared to prostaglandin F2 alpha gel, the need for augmentation with oxytocin in labour was significantly reduced in women induced with prostaglandin E2 pessary (OR 0.46; 95%CI 0.23 to 0.93), vaginal misoprostol (OR 0.34; 95%CI 0.18 to 0.63) and oral misoprostol (OR 0.42; 95%CI 0.22 to 0.78). There was no difference in mode of delivery. There was a significantly reduced risk (OR 0.20; 95%CI 0.04 to 0.86) of Caesarean section (CS) for failure to progress in the vaginal misoprostol group. Labour induced with misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 pessary was significantly shorter than in prostaglandin F2 alpha gel. Vaginal misoprostol significantly shortened the induction to delivery interval. There were more admissions to the neonatal unit in the misoprostol groups.
                Compared to prostaglandin F2 alpha gel, misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 pessary had reduced need for oxytocin and a shorter duration of labour. Effects of misoprostol on the foetus need further investigation before it is used as a routine agent for induction of labour. To compare intravaginal misoprostol to prostaglandin (PG) E2 for cervical ripening in women with premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) after 34 weeks of gestation.
                Women with PROM after 34 weeks of gestation and an unripe cervix were randomized to receive PGE2 (2.5 mg) or misoprostol (50 microg). Both agents were placed intravaginally immediately after randomization, and the dose was repeated 6 hours later if necessary. After another 6 hours from the second insertion, oxytocin treatment was started if labor had not begun. Forty patients in each group were required to show a 30% improvement in delivery within 12 hours in the misoprostol group.
                One hundred nine patients were randomized; 54 were assigned to misoprostol and 55 to PGE2. Important demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the groups. The mean time from first insertion to delivery was 16.4 hours in the misoprostol group and 22.0 hours in the PGE2 group. A second dose was required less frequently in the misoprostol group (22% vs 62% in the PGE2 group), and the percentage of patients delivered within 12 hours was higher in the misoprostol group (41% vs 16%). Tachysystole occurred in 20% and 6% of women in the misoprostol and PGE2 groups, respectively. Hyperstimulation occurred in 9% and 0%, and cesarean delivery in 19% and 26% of women in the misoprostol and PGE2 groups, respectively. Neonatal outcome was similar between groups.
                Intravaginal misoprostol is more effective than local PGE2 application to treat PROM after 34 weeks of gestation, but tachysystole occurs more commonly with misoprostol. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of sublingual misoprostol with those of intramuscular 15-methyl-prostaglandin F2alpha (15-M-PG F2alpha) for cervical dilation prior to vacuum aspiration (VA) in first-trimester pregnancy termination.
                Sixty pregnant women requesting pregnancy termination between the 9th and 12th week were randomized to receive 400 microg of sublingual misoprostol or an intramuscular injection of 125 microg of 15-M-PG F2alpha 2 h prior to vacuum aspiration. Baseline cervical dilation prior to vacuum aspiration was measured using Hegar's dilators. Other variables assessed included procedure duration, intraoperative blood loss, and associated adverse effects. Patient acceptability was assessed by questionnaires completed at the time of discharge from the hospital.
                Mean cervical dilation at vacuum aspiration was significantly greater in the misoprostol group than in the 15-M-PG F2alpha group (8.8 vs. 7.6 mm; P<0.01), and preoperative adverse effects were significantly less frequent in the sublingual misoprostol group (P<0.05). However, procedure duration and intraoperative blood loss were similar in both groups. The acceptability rates were 93.3% in the sublingual misoprostol group and 76.6% in the 15-M-PG F2alpha group, respectively; however, 6.6% patients in the sublingual misoprostol group thought that the tablets had an unpleasant taste.
                Sublingual misoprostol appears to be an effective alternative to intramuscular 15-M-PG F2alpha for cervical dilation prior to vacuum aspiration in first trimester pregnancy. In addition, misoprostol is inexpensive and convenient to use and has higher patient acceptability rates. To determine if misoprostol (exogenous prostaglandin E1 PGE1) used vaginally was of value in improving the Bishop score, leading to an early safe vaginal delivery in women in whom the cervix is unripe and delivery is indicated.
                A double-blind clinical trial.
                Antenatal and labour wards of the University Hospital of the West Indies, Jamaica.
                Forty-five women in the third trimester with various obstetric indications for induction of labour and with no contra-indications to prostaglandins.
                The women were randomly assigned to receive treatment or a placebo. The treated group had 100 micrograms misoprostol inserted vaginally while the placebo was similarly inserted.
                Efficacy of the misoprostol was measured by the increase in the Bishop score 12 h after giving the treatment, the time between insertion and delivery, the need for oxytocin, and the outcome of the pregnancy.
                The prostaglandin was superior to the placebo in ripening the cervix and inducing labour. The change in Bishop score was 5.3 in the misoprostol group compared with 1.5 in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The mean time from insertion to delivery was 15.6 h in the former while it was 43.2 h in the placebo group (P < or = 0.001). The need for oxytocin was also significantly less in the women receiving the prostaglandin compared with those who received the placebo (29% vs 62%, P < 0.02). There was no difference in the two groups in the delivery outcome in terms of complications, Apgar scores and mode of delivery.
                Intravaginal misoprostol is an effective and cheap method of inducing labour in the third trimester. Our purpose was to compare the efficacy, safety, and adverse effects of intra-amniotically administered (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F(2alpha) and intravaginally administered misoprostol for second-trimester uterine evacuation.
                Fifty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive either a single 2.5-mg intra-amniotic injection of (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F(2)(alpha) (n = 26) or two 200-microg intravaginal doses of misoprostol (n = 25) at 12-hour intervals. The primary outcome measured was evacuation of the uterus within 24 hours.
                The mean time from initiation of termination to uterine evacuation was less in the prostaglandin group than in the misoprostol group (17.5 +/- 8.6 hours vs 22.3 +/- 12.5 hours), but this was not statistically significant (P >.05). The rate of successful fetal evacuation at 24 hours was significantly higher in the prostaglandin group than in the misoprostol group (88% vs 60%, P =.02). The complete-abortion rate and the incidence of adverse effects were similar in both groups.
                The use of an intra-amniotic injection of (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F(2alpha) for midtrimester pregnancy termination is safe and is associated with a greater number of successful uterine evacuations within 24 hours, without an increase in adverse effects, than intravaginal administration of misoprostol. The object of this study was to compare intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) for second-trimester pregnancy termination, and to examine the role of the nitric oxide donor, glyceryl trinitrate, as a possible alternative to prostaglandins to induce cervical ripening in second-trimester pregnancy termination. This was a randomised clinical trial. The trial involved pregnant women between 13 and 28 weeks' gestation admitted with clear medical or obstetric indications for pregnancy termination, and was carried out in the department of obstetrics and gynecology, Assiut University Hospital, Egypt. Patients were classified into Group A, where pregnancy termination was induced by vaginal misoprostol 100 micrograms every 4 hours with a maximum dose of 500 micrograms; Group B, where induction was by vaginal dinoprostone 6 mg every 6 hours with a maximum dose of 24 mg; and Group C, where induction involved vaginal glyceryl trinitrate 500 micrograms every 6 hours with a maximum dose of 2.5 mg. Twenty-four hours after the start of induction, the rate of complete abortion in the three groups was 100%, 66.67% and 0%, respectively. The rate of complete abortion was 100% in the nitric oxide (glyceryl trinitrate)-induced group after introducing a complementary procedure. The induction-abortion interval was significantly shorter, the number of doses needed was less and the maximum Bishop score reached was greater with misoprostol than with dinoprostone. A higher rate of side effects occurred with the misoprostol-induced group (74%) compared with the other two groups (46.6% and 0%). Misoprostol is a cheap, effective drug for second-trimester pregnancy termination with short induction abortion intervals but a higher rate of side effects. Prostin E2 is also effective in termination of second-trimester pregnancy but is expensive and may require high doses to be administered. Glyceryl trinitrate is an effective drug for cervical ripening (softening) but it has no role in the stimulation of uterine contractions. The objective of this work was to study the abortifacient effects of misoprostol, an orally active prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) analogue, in the second trimester. A randomized study of two prostaglandin regimens in women pre-treated with the antiprogesterone mifepristone was carried out in the gynaecological wards of Aberdeen Royal Hospitals, NHS Trust, and included 60 women at 13-20 weeks' gestation, in whom termination of pregnancy had been agreed. Following pre-treatment with mifepristone 600 mg women were randomly allocated to one of two prostaglandin regimens which started 36-48 h later. The first misoprostol 400 micrograms orally (up to three doses) followed by gemeprost vaginal pessary 1 mg up to two doses. The second was gemeprost vaginal pessary 1 mg up to five doses. The main outcome measures were success rate induction-to-abortion interval and side-effects. There were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the main outcome measures. We conclude that misoprostol is a stable, cheap PGE1 analogue with demonstrable efficacy and acceptable side-effects in the management of second trimester abortion. Further work is needed to establish the optimum dose and regimen. Our purpose was to compare the safety and efficacy of intravaginally administered misoprostol versus prostaglandin E2 for labor induction in a double-blind, randomized trial.
                One hundred three patients with indications for labor induction (including prelabor rupture of membranes) were randomized and received either misoprostol 50 micrograms or prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) 3 mg intravaginally. The dose was repeated 6, 24, and 30 hours after the first dose until active labor was achieved. For proper blinding, the drugs were prepared as identical-looking vaginal tablets.
                With use of a random number-generated table 52 patients were allocated to the misoprostol group and 51 to the prostaglandin E2 group. After exclusion of 3 patients, 50 in each group were evaluated. Delivery within 24 hours after administration occurred more often in the misoprostol group (70% vs 46% in the prostaglandin E2 group, p = 0.009), and fewer patients in this group needed more than two doses (12% vs 30%, p = 0.027). No difference in cesarean section rate (12% vs 14%, p = 0.67), fetal heart rate anomalies (33% vs 34%, p = 0.89), tachysystole (8% vs 14%, p = 0.37), hyperstimulation syndrome (0% vs 2%, not significant), meconium passage (28% vs 18%, p = 0.22), and fetal outcome (Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, arterial and venous umbilical cord blood pH, transfer to neonatal intensive care unit) was noted between the two groups.
                Intravaginal misoprostol is a safe drug for labor induction with superior effectiveness compared with intravaginal prostaglandin E2. To compare the efficacy and side effects of extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha with intracervical misoprostol for midtrimester termination of pregnancy
                Forty women were randomized to receive either intracervical misoprostol or extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha for termination of pregnancy for congenital abnormalities or intrauterine fetal death. Induction-abortion interval and the incidence of side effects were analyzed for both groups.
                All women in the PGF2alpha group; aborted within 28 hours, 16 (80%) of which aborted within 20 hours. Medical termination of pregnancy was complete in 13 cases (65%). In the misoprostol group; all women aborted within 20 hours, 18 (90%) of which aborted within 13 hours. Medical termination of pregnancy was complete in 17 cases (85%). The induction to abortion intervals for the extra-amniotic PGF2alpha and intracervical misoprostol were 16+/-5.9 hours, and 10.3+/-4 hours (mean+/-s.d.) respectively. This was statistically significant (p=0.001). The incidence of prostaglandin-associated pyrexia, vomiting and diarrhea were significantly increased in the PGF2alpha group (p<0.05). Abdominal pain was similar in both groups. There was no post-abortive hemorrhage or infection.
                Misoprostol is an effective, easy to use, safe and cheap drug for termination of second trimester pregnancy. Intracervical administration of misoprostol appears to be effective and well-tolerated with less side effects and no complications. Larger, randomized comparative studies should be carried out to assess its potential advantages. This randomized trial compares the efficacy and side effects of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before first-trimester pregnancy termination. One-hundred pregnant women between 6 and 12 weeks of gestation opting for termination of pregnancy by suction evacuation were included in this study. The women were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 received 400 microg of sublingual misoprostol and group 2 received 400 microg of vaginal misoprostol 2 h prior to suction evacuation. The abortion was carried out by suction evacuation using a Karman's cannula attached to an electrically operated suction machine under intravenous analgesia. Baseline cervical dilatation, duration of the procedure, operative blood loss, side effects and complications were noted in both groups. There was a significant difference between the sublingual and vaginal misoprostol groups with respect to mean cervical dilatation (8.6 mm vs. 6.8 mm, p < 0.05). However, the duration of the procedure (3.03 min vs. 3.16 min) and the amount of blood loss (29 mL vs. 31.2 mL) were not significantly different between the two groups. The women in the sublingual group experienced significantly more shivering and preoperative vaginal bleeding (68% vs. 56%, p < 0.05). None of the women in the two groups had either uterine perforation or excessive hemorrhage. In our study, sublingual misoprostol (400 microg) was significantly more effective in facilitating cervical dilation prior to surgical abortion than vaginal misoprostol. Extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha (PG F2alpha) is probably the most widely used medical method for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy. The method is highly effective but is financially costly, particularly for poor countries faced with restricted health budgets. The aim of this study was to establish whether misoprostol administered vaginally is as effective as PG F2alpha. Sixty-one patients were prospectively randomized to receive either misoprostol (n=30) vaginally, or PG F2alpha (n=31) extra-amniotically. The overall success rate was 83.6%. The success rates in the misoprostol and PG F2alpha groups were 83.3% and 83.8% respectively. There was no statistical difference in the groups in relation to side effects. In this carefully selected group of patients, misoprostol was as safe and effective as PG F2alpha in mid-trimester termination of pregnancy. In these days of financial constraints, misoprostol is the preferred method for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy. Our purpose was to compare the effectiveness, women's views of the termination procedure, and success of umbilical cord culture for vaginal and oral misoprostol versus intra-amniotic prostaglandin PGF(2alpha) for second-trimester pregnancy termination (STPT).
                We randomized 217 women, 15 to 24 weeks' gestation, into 3 groups. Oral (OM) and vaginal (VM) misoprostol groups received 400 microg of misoprostol every 4 hours for 24 hours. The intra-amniotic PGF(2alpha) (IAPG) group received 40 mg of PGF(2alpha) followed by oxytocin infusion. Women completed self-administered questionnaires 3 weeks after the termination procedure. Umbilical cord samples were collected at delivery for karyotype analysis. The primary outcome was the time from start of the procedure to placental delivery. Secondary outcomes were maternal complications, women's acceptance of the termination procedure, and success rates of umbilical cord culture.
                The time was longer for the OM group (30.5+/-14.4 hours) compared with the VM group (18.3+/-8.2 hours) and the IAPG group (21.1+/-10.2 hours), P<.001 for both comparisons. Women in the VM group reported being more willing to repeat the termination method in the future and reported fewer side effects than those in the other groups, P<.001. Failure rates for umbilical cord cultures were 9.6%, 17.0%, and 45.6% for the VM, OM, and IAPG groups, respectively.
                Oral misoprostol is less effective than intra-amniotic PGF(2alpha) or vaginal misoprostol for STPT. Women report vaginal misoprostol more acceptable than other methods. Umbilical cord culture failure rate is highest in the IAPG group. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the sublingual and vaginal administration of misoprostol for cervical priming before surgical termination of pregnancy.
                In a randomized controlled trial, 74 primigravid women who were undergoing surgical abortion were assigned randomly to receive misoprostol (400 microg) sublingually or vaginally.
                There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative force that was required to dilate the cervix to 9 mm, for baseline cervical dilatation, for priming to abortion interval, for operating time, or for intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. Women in the sublingual group had more nausea (P=.008), vomiting (P=.01), diarrhea (P=.01), and unpleasant mouth taste (P=.0001) compared with the women in the vaginal group. In the sublingual group, 65% of women were satisfied with the route of misoprostol administration compared with 78% in the vaginal group (P=.11). Most of the staff members (84%) said that they would recommend the sublingual administration of misoprostol (P=.0001).
                The sublingual administration of misoprostol is an effective alternative to vaginal administration for cervical priming before surgical abortion; despite a higher incidence of side effects, there was high patient and staff acceptability. To identify an effective misoprostol-only regimen for the termination of second trimester pregnancy, we compared sublingual and vaginal administration of multiple doses of misoprostol in a randomized, placebo-controlled equivalence trial.
                Six hundred and eighty-one healthy pregnant women requesting medical abortion at 13-20 weeks' gestation were randomly assigned within 11 gynaecological centres in seven countries into two treatment groups: 400 microg of misoprostol administered either sublingually or vaginally every 3 h up to five doses, followed by sublingual administration of 400 microg misoprostol every 3 h up to five doses if abortion had not occurred at 24 h after the start of treatment. We chose 10% as the margin of equivalence. The primary end-point was the efficacy of the treatments to terminate pregnancy in 24 h. Successful abortion within 48 h was also considered as an outcome along with the induction-to-abortion-interval, side effects and women's perceptions on these treatments.
                At 24 h, the success (complete or incomplete abortion) rate was 85.9% in the vaginal administration group and 79.8% in the sublingual group (difference: 6.1%, 95% CI: 0.5 to 11.8). Thus, equivalence could not be concluded overall; the difference, however, was driven by the nulliparous women, among whom vaginal administration was clearly superior to sublingual administration (87.3% versus 68.5%), whereas no significant difference was observed between vaginal and sublingual treatments among parous women (84.7% versus 88.5%). The rates of side effects were similar in both groups except for fever, which was more common in the vaginal group. About 70% of women in both groups preferred sublingual administration.
                Equivalence between vaginal and sublingual administration could not be demonstrated overall. Vaginal administration showed a higher effectiveness than sublingual administration in terminating second trimester pregnancies, but this result was mainly driven by nulliparous women. Fever was more prevalent with vaginal administration. Registered with International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial number ISRCTN72965671. The combination of mifepristone (RU486) and prostaglandin is effective in the induction of abortion in the second trimester. The optimal regimen is still under development, but is likely to be characterized by a short induction-to-abortion interval, low incidence of side-effects and high acceptability. We have investigated further whether misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue, can reliably induce second trimester abortion in 70 women pre-treated with mifepristone, and whether different routes of administration affect the induction-to-abortion interval. Abortion was achieved in 97% [95% confidence interval (CI) 90-100%] of cases without resort to other prostaglandin agents. The mean induction abortion time for the studied population was 6.4 h (95% CI 5.6-7.0 h). No significant difference was found between two different routes of administration, namely vaginal versus a combination of vaginal and oral. Misoprostol has a number of advantages over other prostaglandin preparations. We recommend that, following pre-treatment with mifepristone, misoprostol is used as the prostaglandin of choice to induce abortion in the second trimester. To compare the efficacy and safety of misoprostol (prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1))) with dinoprostone (prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2))) for third trimester cervical ripening and labor induction.
                Patients requiring induction of labor were randomly assigned to receive either 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol every 4 h or 0.5 mg of intracervical dinoprostone gel every 6 h. Eligibility criteria included gestation = 36 weeks. Primary outcome was the time interval from induction to delivery; secondary outcomes were mode of delivery, perinatal outcome, and interpretation of cardiotocogram (CTG) records.
                Two hundred women were randomly enrolled to receive either misoprostol (n = 100) or dinoprostone (n = 100). Time induction-to-delivery at 12, 24 and 48 h and the need for oxytocin were reduced with misoprostol (P < 0.05). Pathological CTG tracing according to FIGO and Melchior scores were more frequent in the misoprostol-treated group (P < 0.001).
                Misoprostol shortened the induction-to-delivery interval, but is associated with a higher incidence of abnormal CTG than prostaglandin E(2). To determine the efficacy of 200 microg single dose oral misoprostol as a cervical priming agent at term.
                In this double-blind randomized trial, 156 pregnant women requiring induction of labor with gestational age of 37-42 weeks and Bishop score < or =5, were randomized to receive either 200 microg of misoprostol or a placebo, orally. Labor was induced with intravenous oxytocin infusion 12 h after oral medication if the patient did not go into labor. The primary outcome was the change in the Bishop score 12 h after oral medication. The secondary outcomes were the timings starting from the drug administration to the onset of uterine activity, interval between oral medication and delivery, oxytocin need for induction, mode of delivery, frequency of side effects, and neonatal and maternal outcome. The chi-square or Fisher exact test, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U-test were used for analysis of the data.
                There were no significant differences in maternal characteristics or indications of induction. The Bishop score 12 h after oral medication significantly improved in the misoprostol group compared with the control group [55 (70%)>8 vs. 4 (5%)>8; P<0.001]. The induction rate was significantly reduced in the misoprostol group (P<0.001). The interval between oral medication and the onset of uterine activity was significantly shorter in the misoprostol group (P<0.001). The interval between oral medication and delivery was also significantly shorter in the misoprostol group (P<0.001). The cesarean delivery rate was significantly lower in the misoprostol group (P<0.001). There were no differences between the groups with respect to the incidence of tachysystole, hyperstimulation, adverse neonatal or maternal outcome.
                Oral administration of 200 microg single dose of misoprostol is an effective agent not only for cervical priming but also for induction of labor at term. Furthermore, it reduces the rate of cesarean deliveries. The objective of this work was to compare the efficacy of 50 and 100 microg of misoprostol administered intravaginally for cervical ripening and labor induction. Ninety-five patients were randomly assigned to receive 50 microg (n=48) or 100 microg (n=47) of misoprostol. The primary measures in this study were cesarean section rate, time from induction to delivery, need for oxytocin use, rate of uterine hyperstimulation and tachysystoles, proportion of fetal distress and neonatal Apgar score. The interval from first dose of prostaglandin to delivery was significantly shorter in the 100 ,g-group (p < 0.05). The use of oxytocin augmentation was significantly higher in the 50 microg-group (64.6% vs. 31.9%). There were 9 cases (18.8%) of tachysystole in the 50-microg group and 12 cases (25.5%) in the 100 microg-group (p NS). The cesarean section rate was double in the 100 microg-group and the difference was statically significant (p < 0.05). There was no report of uterine rupture. It can be concluded that 50 microg of misoprostol applied in the posterior vaginal fornix every 4 hours is an effective dosage for labor induction and has less adverse effects and complications than the 100 microg dose. A prospective randomised controlled trial was undertaken to compare the efficacy of two routes of administration, oral versus vaginal, of the prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol (Cytotec) to effect termination of pregnancy in the mid-trimester. Fifty-five women were recruited into the trial; 26 to receive all doses orally and 29 via the vaginal route. The dosing regimen was 400 microg as the initial dose followed by a second dose of 200 microg two hours later and then four-hourly 200 microg doses until delivery or 32 hours from commencement of treatment. If delivery had not been effected by the last dose of misoprostol, a Syntocinon infusion was started synchronously Misoprostol administered vaginally was significantly more effective than when administered orally as judged by induction-to-delivery interval and also the need or otherwise to augment therapy with a Syntocinon infusion. The average induction-to-delivery interval was 17.5 hours in the vaginal group compared to 33 hours in the oral group (p = 0.0003). The percentages of women who delivered at 24 and 48 hours were 93% and 100% in the vaginal administration group and 19% and 70% in the oral administration group (p < 0.05). No significant differences in complication rates or side effects were noted between the two groups The aim of this randomized study was to compare the effectiveness, safety, and side effects of 6 h vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) for labor induction.
                Fifty microgram of misoprostol was given intravaginally in the misoprostol group (204 women), and 3 mg PGE(2) was given intravaginally in the PGE(2) group (211 women). In both groups, the dose was repeated every 6 h for a maximum of three doses, until active labor was achieved. Artificial rupture of membranes and oxytocin infusion was used during labor in both groups where it was indicated.
                The mean interval from the institution of labor induction to delivery was 11.3 +/- 8.6 h for the misoprostol group, and 15.7 +/- 9.3 h for PGE(2 )group (P < 0.05). In the misoprostol group, oxytocin was used less frequently, but there was a higher prevalence of tachysystole. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups as regard abnormal patterns of fetal heart rate, the mode of delivery, and the need for neonatal intervention.
                In conclusion, the intravaginal administration of 50 mug misoprostol at 6 h interval (maximum three doses) is comparable in safety, but more effective for induction of labor than 3 mg intravaginal PGE(2). To evaluate the efficacy of intravaginal prostaglandin E1 methyl analogue misoprostol in cervical ripening in patients with unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < 4) requiring labor induction.
                A randomized controlled clinical trial of 62 women in the third trimester with various indications for induction of labor were randomly allocated to receive either 100 micrograms misoprostol inserted vaginally (32) or placebo similarly applied (30). Transvaginal sonography was performed to measure the cervical length before and 12 hrs after insertion.
                The mean change in cervical length and Bishop score was significantly greater in the misoprostol group (24 mm and score 8) compared with in the placebo group (2.2 mm and score 1) (p = 0.001). All but one patients receiving misoprostol went into labor while only one in the placebo group did so. The interval from insertion to vaginal delivery was significantly shorter in the misoprostol group (12.0 vs 25.5 hrs, p < 0.001). Delivery occurred within 24 hrs in 75% and 30% of patients in the misoprostol and placebo groups respectively. Uterine tachsystole occurred more frequently in the misoprostol group (38%) than in the placebo group (0%) (p < 0.001). All could be rapidly reversed by tocolytics without apparent untoward intrapartum effects. No significant differences were noted in the 2 groups in terms of perinatal outcomes and mode of delivery.
                Intravaginal misoprostol is an effective, cheap and safe method for cervical ripening. The higher frequency of uterine tachysystole in the misoprostol group did not increase the risk of adverse intrapartum and neonatal outcomes. The objective of this prospective randomized placebo-controlled study was to determine the efficacy of sublingual misoprostol in facilitating cervical dilatation before surgical abortion in first trimester pregnancy. Sixty healthy pregnant women between 6 and 11 weeks of gestation opting for voluntary medical termination of pregnancy at All India Institute of Medical Sciences hospital were included in this study. Women were randomized to two groups, the study group (n = 30) received 400 micro g of sublingual misoprostol and the control group (n = 30) received placebo, 2 h prior to surgical abortion. Using Hegar's dilators, cervical dilatation prior to vacuum aspiration was measured. Other parameters assessed included the total time required for the procedure, intraoperative blood loss and associated side effects. The mean cervical dilatation in the misoprostol group was 7.7 mm as compared to 3.4 mm for placebo group. The average time required for pregnancy termination was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) in the misoprostol group. The procedure-related blood loss was also significantly decreased in the misoprostol group. However, side effects including pre-evacuation vaginal bleeding, lower abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting were significantly higher in the misoprostol group than in placebo group (p < 0.005). There was no case of hemorrhage or uterine perforation in either group. Sublingual misoprostol is effective in facilitating cervical dilatation prior to surgical abortion. Its usage significantly decreased the time of surgical evacuation and minimized blood loss during the procedure. Our purpose was to compare the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) gel for preinduction cervical ripening and induction of labor.
                One hundred thirty-five patients with indications for induction of labor and unfavorable cervices were randomly assigned to receive either intravaginal misoprostol or intracervical dinoprostone. Fifty microgram tablets of misoprostol were placed in the posterior vaginal fornix every 3 hours for a maximum of six doses. Prostaglandin E2 in gel form, 0.5 mg, was placed into the endocervix every 6 hours for a maximum of three doses. Medication was not given after either spontaneous rupture of membranes or beginning of active labor.
                Among 135 patients enrolled, 68 received misoprostol and 67 received dinoprostone. The average interval from start of induction to vaginal delivery was shorter in the misoprostol group (903.3 +/- 482.1 minutes) than in the dinoprostone group (1410.9 +/- 869.1 minutes) (p < 0.001). Oxytocin augmentation of labor occurred more often in the dinoprostone group (65.7%) than in the misoprostol group (33.8%) (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between routes of delivery. Ten of the misoprostol-treated patients (14.7%) and 13 of the dinoprostone-treated patients (19.4%) had cesarean deliveries. There was a higher prevalence of tachysystole (six or more uterine contractions in a 10-minute window for two consecutive 10-minute periods) in the misoprostol group (36.7%) than in the dinoprostone group (11.9%) (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in frequency of uterine hyperstimulation or hypertonus. There was a higher prevalence of meconium passage in the misoprostol group (27.9%) than in the dinoprostone group (10.5%) (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in frequency of abnormal fetal heart rate tracings, 1- or 5-minute Apgar scores < 7, neonatal resuscitations, or admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit between the two groups.
                Vaginally administered misoprostol is an effective agent for cervical ripening and induction of labor; however when given at this dosage, it is associated with a higher prevalence of tachysystole and meconium passage than is dinoprostone. Further studies to compare the safety of misoprostol to that of dinoprostone and to delineate an optimal dosing regimen for misoprostol are needed. The most widely used medical method of terminating second-trimester pregnancy is the intravaginal administration of prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone [PGE2]). This treatment is highly effective but is associated with severe gastrointestinal side effects and hyperpyrexia.
                We conducted a prospective, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol, a prostaglandin E1 analogue (200 micrograms intravaginally every 12 hours), with the efficacy and safety of PGE2 (20 mg intravaginally every 3 hours). The study population included 55 pregnant women between 12 and 22 weeks' gestation who were undergoing termination of pregnancy for either intrauterine fetal death (37 women) or medical or genetic reasons (18 women).
                The rate of successful abortions within 24 hours was 81 percent (22 of 27 women) with PGE2 and 89 percent (25 of 28 women) with misoprostol (P = 0.47). All the women who received misoprostol had successful abortions within 38 hours. Among those who had an abortion within 24 hours, the mean interval from treatment to abortion was similar in both groups (10.6 hours with PGE2 and 12.0 hours with misoprostol, P = 0.33). The rate of complete abortion, defined as the passage of the fetus and the placenta simultaneously, was 32 percent for PGE2 and 43 percent for misoprostol (P = 0.56). Certain side effects were more frequent in the women receiving PGE2 than in those receiving misoprostol: pyrexia (63 percent vs. 11 percent; P < 0.001), uterine pain (67 percent vs. 57 percent, P = 0.58), vomiting (33 percent vs. 4 percent, P = 0.005), and diarrhea (30 percent vs. 4 percent, P = 0.012). The average cost per treatment was $315.30 for PGE2, as compared with $0.97 for misoprostol.
                Misoprostol is at least as effective as PGE2 for the termination of second-trimester pregnancy involving either a dead or a living fetus, but it is less costly, is easier to administer, and is associated with fewer adverse effects. Misoprostol is an effective agent for pre-operative cervical priming before surgical termination of pregnancy in the first trimester. Previous studies have shown that both oral and vaginal routes are equally effective for such a purpose. This study aimed to compare a new route of sublingual administration to the vaginal route of administration for pre-operative cervical priming in first trimester surgical abortion.
                Eighty women with gestational age <12 weeks were randomized by a computer-generated model to receive 400 micro g of misoprostol either sublingually or vaginally 3 h prior to vacuum aspiration. The primary outcome measure was the degree of cervical dilatation, and secondary outcomes included the force required to dilate the cervix from 3 to 8 mm, intra-operative blood loss and incidence of pre-operative side-effects.
                There was no significant difference in the baseline cervical dilatation (sublingual: 7.6 +/- 1.3 mm; vaginal: 7.7 +/- 0.73 mm), cumulative force required to dilate the cervix from 3 to 8 mm (sublingual: 9.0 +/- 9.8 N; vaginal: 6.6 +/- 5.4 N) and total blood loss (sublingual: 52.1 +/- 20.2 ml; vaginal: 48.3 +/- 12.3 ml). Pre-operative side-effects were also similar.
                Both sublingual and vaginal misoprostol are effective in cervical priming before surgical termination of pregnancy in the first trimester. Sublingual misoprostol has the advantage of being more convenient to administer and may be more suitable for day surgery. It is known that when misoprostol is given at 200 microg every 3 h after mifepristone pretreatment, the vaginal route is more effective than the oral route. However, women prefer the oral route. This randomized study was to test our hypothesis that oral misoprostol 400 microg is as effective as vaginal misoprostol 200 microg when given every 3 h in termination of second trimester pregnancy after priming with mifepristone. A total of 142 patients was randomly assigned to group 1 (200 mg mifepristone + 400 microg oral misoprostol every 3 h up to five doses) or group 2 (200 mg mifepristone + 200 microg vaginal misoprostol every 3 h up to five doses). The incidence of side-effects and the preference study were assessed through a standardized questionnaire during and after the abortion. For the oral group, both the incidence of diarrhoea (40.0 versus 23.2%, P = 0.03) and the amount of drug used (1734 compared with 812 microg, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher than that of the vaginal group but the incidence of fever appeared to be lower (not significant). There was no significant difference in complete abortion rate: 81.4% in the oral group and 75.4% in the vaginal group. The median induction-abortion interval was similar in the two groups (10.4 versus 10.0 h). The percentage of women who aborted in 24 h was also similar: 57/70 (81.4%) in the oral group and 58/69 (87.0%) in the vaginal group. Overall, 82.0% of women preferred the oral route. Oral misoprostol (400 microg) given every 3 h up to five doses, when combined with mifepristone, was as effective as the vaginal (200 microg) route in second trimester termination of pregnancy. This regimen could also be offered to those women who found repeated vaginal administration unacceptable. Our objective was to compare the sublingual administration and the vaginal administration of misoprostol for cervical priming before first-trimester surgical abortion.
                We used an open, multicenter, randomized trial.
                We conducted the study in four clinics (in Valencia, Castelló, Murcia and Murcia Capital) in Spain.
                A total of 1424 healthy pregnant women with amenorrhea of <or=84 days who voluntarily decided to terminate their pregnancy participated in the study.
                Women were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of 400 microg of misoprostol either sublingually or vaginally 1-3 h before aspiration.
                The outcome measures assessed were cervical dilation before surgery and surgical time needed for aspiration. The incidence of side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever/chills and paresthesia, was evaluated.
                The mean cervical dilation achieved was 6.8+/-0.8 and 6.7+/-0.9 mm for the sublingual and vaginal groups, respectively. The mean surgical time was 7.0+/-2.8 and 7.4+/-2.5 min for the sublingual and vaginal groups, respectively. Nausea, vomiting and diarrhea were more frequent in the sublingual group.
                Both regimens had equal efficacy; however, the sublingual route caused more side effects. Our purpose was to compare the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (dinoprostone) for preinduction cervical ripening and induction of labor.
                Two hundred seventy-six patients with indications for induction of labor and unfavorable cervices were randomly assigned to receive either intravaginal misoprostol or intracervical dinoprostone. Twenty-five micrograms of misoprostol were placed in the posterior vaginal fornix every 3 hours, with a potential maximum of eight doses. Prostaglandin E2 in gel form, 0.5 mg, was placed in the endocervix every 6 hours, with a maximum of three doses. Further medication was withheld with the occurrence of spontaneous rupture of membranes, entry into active phase of labor, or a "prolonged contraction response."
                Among those evaluated, 138 received misoprostol and 137 received dinoprostone. The average interval from start of induction to vaginal delivery was shorter in the misoprostol group (1323.0 +/- 844.4 minutes) than in the dinoprostone group (1532.4 +/- 706.5 minutes) (p < 0.05). Need for oxytocin augmentation of labor occurred more commonly in the dinoprostone group (72.6%) than in the misoprostol group (45.7%) (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the routes of delivery. Twenty-eight of the misoprostol-treated patients (20.3%) and thirty-eight of the dinoprostone-treated patients (27.7%) required abdominal delivery. Complications such as uterine tachysystole and thick meconium passage occurred with similar frequency in the two treatment groups.
                Intravaginal administration of misoprostol appears to be as effective as intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Complications associated with prostaglandin administration were not statistically different between the two treatment groups. The cost of misoprostol ($0.36/100 micrograms) is much less than that of dinoprostone ($75/0.5 mg). To compare orally administered misoprostol with intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labor induction.
                Patients presenting with medical or obstetric indications for labor induction whose Bishop's score was < or = 6 were randomly allocated to receive either 50 micrograms of oral misoprostol or 4 mg of intravaginal prostaglandin E2. If adequate cervical ripening (Bishop score of 9 or cervical dilatation of 3) or active labor did not ensue, repeat doses of each medication were administered every four hours. A maximum of six doses of either oral misoprostol or intravaginal prostaglandin E2 was permitted. Intravenous oxytocin was subsequently administered according to a standardized infusion protocol.
                Sixty patients were enrolled, with 29 randomized to the oral misoprostol arm and 31 to the prostaglandin E2 group. The data on 58 patients were eligible for analysis. Delivery occurred within 48 hours in 96.4% (27/28) of those administered oral misoprostol as compared to 76.7% (23/30) of those who received intravaginal prostaglandin E2 (P = .03). The mean time intervals from the start of induction to delivery were similar between the two groups (1,496 +/- 120 vs. 1,723 +/- 230 minutes, P = .40). No statistically significant differences existed between the two groups with respect to intrapartum complications, tachysystole, uterine hyperstimulation or adverse neonatal outcomes.
                Oral administration of misoprostol is an effective alternative to intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening. Misoprostrol, a synthetic analogue of prostaglandin E(1), has been used for cervical preparation. Its ideal dose, route and frequency of administration are still under investigation. We conducted a randomised controlled trial, in a tertiary hospital in a developing country, to compare misoprostol 50 microg (low) and 100 microg (high) for effectiveness and safety in induction of labour at term. Women admitted for induction of labour with a singleton live fetus in cephalic presentation after 37 weeks' gestation were recruited. A misoprostol tablet was inserted in the posterior vaginal fornix at 8-hour intervals. Main outcomes were duration of induction, maternal and fetal complications. The mean duration of induction was 15.4 (SD 10.6) and 14.2 (SD 13.6) h in the low- and high-groups respectively (P = 0.095). There was no difference in need for augmentation with oxytocin (OR 0.82; 95% Cl 0.36-1.86) or operative delivery (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.26-6.84). There were two uterine ruptures and four intrapartum stillbirths in the high misoprostol group. There was no difference in postpartum haemorrhage, 9.5% vs. 7.9% (P = 1.00) and admissions to the neonatal unit 18.8% vs. 17.0% (P = 0.980) in the 1ow- and high-groups) respectively. Misoprostol 50 microg was as effective as the 100 microg dose for induction of labour whereas the higher dose had an increased risk of serious complications. To compare the impact of 400 mug oral versus self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home on pre-operative cervical priming in both primigravid and multigravid women prior to first trimester surgical abortion.
                Randomised controlled trial.
                Norwegian University Teaching Hospital.
                Three hundred and thirty-eight women undergoing surgical abortion between 7 and 12 weeks of gestation.
                The women were randomised to either 400 microg of oral misoprostol the evening before or 400-microg of self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home the same day as vacuum aspiration. Main outcome measures Pre-operative cervical dilatation, complications and acceptability.
                The median cervical dilatation was 6.2 mm (range 0-11 mm) for the women in the 400 mug oral misoprostol and 6.5 mm (range 0-11 mm) in the 400-microg vaginal misoprostol groups. The median pre-operative dilatation was larger in multigravidae (6.4 and 6.7 mm for the oral and vaginal routes, respectively) than in primigravidae (5.8 and 6.0 mm, respectively). In primigravidae, 19% achieved a pre-operative dilatation of > or = 7 mm, with no significant difference between oral and vaginal dosage. In multigravidae, 52% achieved a pre-operative dilatation of > or = 7 mm with vaginal dosage, compared with 36% with oral dosage (P = 0.03). There was no difference between non-immigrant versus immigrant women in pre-operative cervical dilatation. The 400-microg oral dosage group had a higher risk of bleeding, compared with the group receiving 400-microg vaginal misoprostol [odds ratio (OR) = 10.4; confidence interval (CI) 5.2-20.8]. There was no difference between non-immigrant and immigrant women in acceptability of self-administered vaginal misoprostol; almost all women found this administration route acceptable. Complications were minor and were distributed equally between the two dosage groups.
                The vaginal route will result in a satisfactory dilatation in about half of multigravidae but is much less effective in primigravidae. The oral route does not lead to satisfactory dilatation in either group and is associated with a higher occurrence of pre-operative bleeding. Self-administered vaginal misoprostol at home is highly acceptable.
The use of vaginal misoprostol in the termination of second and third trimester of pregnancy is as effective as other prostaglandin preparations (including cervagem, prostaglandin E2 and prostaglandin F2alpha), and more effective than oral administration of misoprostol. However, important information regarding maternal safety, and in particular the occurrence of rare outcomes such as uterine rupture, remains limited. Future research efforts should be directed towards determining the optimal dose and frequency of administration, with particular attention to standardised reporting of all relevant outcomes and assessment of rare adverse events. Further information is required about the use of sublingual misoprostol in this setting.