LHRH analogues for ovulation induction, with particular reference to polycystic ovary syndrome. Ovarian suppression induced with Buserelin or danazol in the management of endometriosis: a randomized, comparative study. Reversible pituitary ovarian suppression induced by an LHRH agonist in the treatment of endometriosis--comparison of two dose regimens. A prospective randomized trial comparing the clinical and endocrinological outcome with rosiglitazone versus laparoscopic ovarian drilling in patients with polycystic ovarian disease resistant to ovulation induction with clomiphene citrate. Effect of prolonged gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in patients with endometriosis. Combined luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogue and exogenous gonadotrophins for the treatment of infertility associated with polycystic ovaries. Ablation of lesions or no treatment in minimal-mild endometriosis in infertile women: a randomized trial. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dell'Endometriosi. Adjunctive leuprolide therapy does not improve cycle fecundity in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination of subfertile women. A randomized clinical trial of treatment of clomiphene citrate-resistant anovulation with the use of oral contraceptive pill suppression and repeat clomiphene citrate treatment. Effect of reduced dose of triptorelin at the start of ovarian stimulation on the outcome of IVF: a randomized study. A randomized controlled study comparing the endocrine effects of pulsatile intravenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment versus clomiphene citrate in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. The effect of exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) on oocyte viability: evidence from a comparative study using recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone or in combination with recombinant LH for ovarian stimulation in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing assisted reproduction. A combination of norethindrone acetate and leuprolide acetate blocks the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonistic response and minimizes cyst formation during ovarian stimulation. Ovarian activity suppression by two different low-dose triphasic oral contraceptives. Evaluation of clomiphene citrate and human chorionic gonadotropin treatment: a prospective, randomized, crossover study during intrauterine insemination cycles. A randomized study of dexamethasone in ovulation induction with clomiphene citrate. Initial experiences with subcutaneous pulsatile human menopausal gonadotropin administration: successful induction of ovulation in patients with polycystic ovarian disease. hCG administration offers no outcome benefit over spontaneous ovulation in anovulatory women treated with clomiphene citrate. Cetrorelix protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog suppression long protocol for superovulation in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients older than 40. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treating male subfertility: a controlled study.
Infertile women with PCO have been treated with exogenous gonadotrophins (hMG/hCG) for ovulation induction either with or without LHRH-agonist treatment. Those treated without LHRH-agonist-induced LH suppression showed PL in greater than 30% of the cycles and this problem was eliminated by LHRH-agonist therapy. The pregnancy rate (approximately 80% of patients) during the combined therapy was approximately twice that of the group treated with hMG/hCG alone. The suppression of endogenous LH by the LHRH-agonist appeared to have no effect upon the profiles of follicular development in response to hMG, and a high rate of follicle recruitment characterized all PCO treatment cycles irrespective of circulating LH concentrations. These results suggest that LH suppression improves the efficacy of ovulation induction but has no influence on the primary metabolic disturbance in the PCO syndrome. The effectiveness of Buserelin (Hoechst-Roussel Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Somerville, NJ) (0.2 mg subcutaneously [SC] or 1.2 mg intranasally [IN] per day) and danazol (800 mg per day) in inducing ovarian suppression for the management of endometriosis was compared in a prospective randomized study. During 6 months of treatment, peripheral follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol concentrations were suppressed to a similar degree in both groups. Symptomatic improvement and laparoscopically assessed regression of endometriotic lesions also were comparable. After treatment, 8 of 18 infertile women treated with Buserelin and 5 of 8 treated with danazol conceived. General and hypoestrogenic side effects were similar in both groups, while androgenic and anabolic were more frequent with danazol. High density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol increased in the Buserelin and decreased in the danazol group. The study indicates that at the dose tested, buserelin and danazol induce a similar degree of ovarian suppression resulting in a comparable clinical improvement and regression of endometriotic lesions. Buserelin [D-Ser(TBU)6-des Gly NH2(10) LHRH ethylamide], an LHRH agonist, was administered intranasally at two dose levels, 200 micrograms t.d.s or 300 micrograms t.d.s., to 20 women with proven endometriosis, many with recurrent disease. Both dose schedules achieved significant suppression of circulating 17 beta-oestradiol levels often to within the postmenopausal range, the larger dose inducing significantly greater suppression (P less than 0.05). Serum FSH values were suppressed below baseline but serum LH remained at pretreatment levels or above, whilst on treatment. Complete resolution of endometriotic deposits was achieved in 68% of cases following 6 months treatment with dramatic and long-standing relief of symptoms with no apparent dose difference. In all other subjects there was significant reduction in the extent of endometriotic deposits and improvement in American Fertility Society classification of disease stage. The most commonly occurring side effect was hot flushes; their intensity and frequency related to the degree of suppression of serum oestradiol and the dose of Buserelin administered. Rosiglitazone, an insulin sensitizing agent is used currently in women with clomiphene citrate (CC) resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Our study proposed to compare the efficacy of rosiglitazone and CC with laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) and CC in terms of biochemical effects, ovulation rate and pregnancy rate in patients of PCOS resistant to CC.
                This prospective randomised trial included 43 patients of PCOS resistant to CC. Twenty-two women were assigned to the rosiglitazone (4 mg twice daily) and CC group and other 21 patients underwent unilateral LOD and then received CC and multivitamins. The treatment continued for six cycles in both the groups. The biochemical response, ovulation rate and pregnancy rate over a follow up period of 6 months were compared.
                Treatment with rosiglitazone and CC or LOD and CC resulted in increased ovulation (80.8 vs. 81.5%) and pregnancy (50 vs. 42.8%), respectively. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of biochemical response, ovulation rate and pregnancy rate.
                To avoid the risk of adverse effects of LOD preference may be given to the use of rosiglitazone and CC therapy in patients of PCOS resistant to CC. To evaluate the effect of a 3-month course of GnRH agonist administered immediately before IVF-ET in infertile patients with endometriosis.
                Prospective, randomized trial.
                Three tertiary care assisted reproductive technology programs.
                IVF-ET candidates with surgically confirmed endometriosis.
                Twenty-five patients received three courses of a long-acting GnRH agonist, 3.75 mg i.m. every 28 days, followed by standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Twenty-six patients received standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with mid-luteal phase GnRH agonist down-regulation or microdose flare regimens.
                Response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, ongoing pregnancy rates per cycle, group implantation rates, and implantation rate per embryo transfer procedure.
                The extent of surgically confirmed endometriosis was greater in patients who received the long-acting GnRH regimen for 3 months before IVF-ET. The groups did not differ significantly in terms of dose or duration of gonadotropin stimulation, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, or number of embryos transferred. Patients who received the long-acting GnRH regimen had significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rates (80% vs. 53.85%) and a trend toward higher implantation rates (42.68% vs. 30.38%).
                Prolonged use of GnRH agonist before IVF-ET in patients with endometriosis resulted in significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rates than did standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation regimens. No deleterious effect on ovarian response was observed. This study was designed to compare the results of treatment with, firstly, exogenous gonadotrophins, with (57 cycles) and without (65 cycles) pretreatment with a superactive analogue of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) and, secondly, pure follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) (50 cycles) with those of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) (72 cycles) in 46 women with clomiphene-citrate-resistant anovulation associated with polycystic ovaries. Patients randomly allocated to the analogue group received buserelin (Suprefact, Hoechst, UK, Ltd, Hounslow, Middlesex), 800 micrograms/day by nasal insufflation and when hypogonadism was achieved, patients were again randomly allocated for ovarian stimulation with either FSH or HMG. Controls received FSH or HMG alone. Patients pretreated with the analogue had similar pregnancy and ovulation rates, needed larger doses and more days of gonadotrophin therapy and had more ovarian overstimulation than those receiving no pretreatment. The role of superactive LHRH analogues for induction of a single ovulation for in-vivo fertilization is thus uncertain. Pure FSH had no advantages over HMG, the LH content of HMG having no deleterious effect on the ovary. In order to analyse the efficacy of resection/ablation of minimal/mild endometriotic lesions for improving fertility, we conducted a randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were women aged </=36 years who were trying to conceive and had a laparoscopically confirmed diagnosis of minimal/mild endometriosis (stage I or II of the revised American Fertility Society classification) and otherwise unexplained infertility for >/=2 years. Eligible women were randomly assigned to resection or ablation of visible endometriosis (54 patients) or diagnostic laparoscopy only (47 patients). After laparoscopy women tried to conceive spontaneously for 1 year (follow-up period). A total of five women withdrew from the study: three for personal reasons, and two were lost to follow-up. Considering 51 women in the resection/ablation and 45 in the no-treatment group who ended the follow-up period, 12 (24%) in the resection/ablation group and 13 (29%) in the no treatment group conceived; the difference was not significant. Two spontaneous abortions were observed in the resection/ablation group and three in the no-treatment one. Thus the 1 year birth rate was 10 out of 51 women (19.6%) in the resection/ablation group and 10 out of 45 women (22.2%) in the no-treatment group. In conclusion, the results of this study do not support the hypothesis that ablation of endometriotic lesions markedly improves fertility rates. Problems arising from controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for intrauterine insemination, such as premature luteinization and asynchronous ovarian follicular development, are identical to those encountered with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT). It has been suggested that the adjunctive use of GnRH agonists for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation improves the efficiency of GIFT and IVF cycles. We hypothesized that adjunctive use of leuprolide acetate, a GnRH agonist, would have a similarly beneficial effect on cycle quality and cycle fecundity in subfertile women treated with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. We randomly assigned the first cycle of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for each of 97 subfertile women to include either human menopausal gonadotropins (hMGs) alone or hMGs following midluteal pre-treatment with leuprolide. If a pregnancy did not occur in the first cycle, the woman was given the other treatment in the second cycle. Although the cycles that included leuprolide required a larger amount of hMGs and more days of stimulation per cycle, the mean estradiol concentrations and numbers of follicles were not different. Despite prevention of premature luteinization with leuprolide, the cycle fecundity was not different between groups (0.11 with adjunctive leuprolide treatment and 0.22 with hMGs alone). We conclude that in unselected subfertile patients, the adjunctive use of leuprolide for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination does not improve cycle fecundity compared with treatment cycles that do not include adjunctive leuprolide therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and endocrine response of oral contraceptive ovarian suppression followed by clomiphene citrate in patients who previously were clomiphene citrate resistant.
                Forty-eight patients from a private tertiary infertility clinic were assigned randomly prospectively to either group 1 (oral contraceptive/clomiphene citrate), which received continuous oral contraceptives followed by clomiphene citrate, or to group 2 (control) received no treatment in the cycle before clomiphene citrate treatment. On day 3, 17 beta-estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and androgens were assayed before and after treatment. Follicle growth, ovulation, and pregnancy were evaluated. The Student t test and analysis of variance were used for statistical significance.
                The oral contraceptive/clomiphene citrate group had a significantly higher percentage of patients who ovulated and of ovulatory cycles and pregnancies. Significantly lower levels of 17 beta-estradiol, luteinizing hormone, and androgen levels were seen in the oral contraceptive/clomiphene citrate group, with no significant changes in group 2.
                Suppression of the ovary with oral contraceptives results in excellent rates of ovulation and pregnancy in patients who previously were resistant to clomiphene citrate. The decreases in ovarian androgens, luteinizing hormone, and 17 beta-estradiol may be responsible for the improved response. Partial pituitary desensitization using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists may be sufficient in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproduction. However, the minimal effective agonist dose remains to be determined. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of a reduced daily dose of triptorelin, administered at the start of ovarian stimulation, on the results of IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
                A total of 132 patients was randomized in two groups. Pituitary desensitization was obtained in group 1 (66 patients) with a single 3.75 mg injection (i.m.) of triptorelin. In group 2, 66 patients received 100 microg triptorelin daily, which was then reduced to 50 microg at the start of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulation.
                No significant differences were found in terms of pregnancy rate per transfer (38% in group 1 versus 34.9% in group 2), implantation rate (20.2 versus 18%) and abortion rate (8.3 versus 9.1%). The number of FSH ampoules used, as well as the number of days stimulation required, was significantly reduced in group 2 (41 +/- 26 versus 46.6 +/- 25.3, P < 0.03 and 11 +/- 1.3 versus 11.8 +/- 1.5, P < 0.002 respectively). No significant differences were seen in oestradiol concentrations and in follicle number, in the quantity of oocytes collected and fertilized, or in the number of embryos obtained or transferred.
                A reduced dose of triptorelin is enough for pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation but provides no significant improvement in IVF cycle outcome when compared with depot formulation. The possibility of a shorter treatment protocol requiring lower amounts of gonadotrophins should be considered in view of its economic advantage. OBJECTIVE: To compare the endocrine changes in the follicular phase in infertile patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) treated with either pulsatile IV GnRH after GnRH-agonist (GnRH-a) down-regulation or clomiphene citrate (CC). DESIGN: Subgroup analysis within a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. SETTING: Women referred to the Infertility Clinic, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, The Netherlands. PATIENT(s): Twenty-eight infertile patients with PCOS. INTERVENTIONs): Patients were randomly assigned to pulsatile IV GnRH (10-20 microgram/90 min) after GnRH-a down-regulation or CC (50-150 mg; cycle days 3-7). Patients were monitored on alternate days with ovarian sonography and serum concentrations of E(2), LH, and FSH. Serum P and sonography confirmed ovulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(s): Serum concentrations of E(2), LH, and FSH were assessed before treatment was started and after each ovarian sonography. RESULT(s): In ovulatory cycles, no statistically significant differences were observed during the follicular phase comparing serum concentrations of E(2), LH, and FSH between the treatments. However, a significant increase in LH occurred in the GnRH group. CONCLUSION(s): No significant endocrine differences were observed between GnRH and CC treatment. However, there was a significant increase in the serum LH concentration during the follicular phase in the GnRH group. Increments of LH in the GnRH group may be due to recovery of endogenous LH secretion. The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to compare ovarian response and oocyte and embryo yields in women undergoing ovulation induction for IVF/ICSI using recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) alone or in combination with recombinant human LH (rhLH).
                Patients were randomized to receive rhFSH alone (group F; n = 13) or rhFSH + rhLH (group L; n = 15). rhFSH was administered according to a step-down protocol; patients assigned to group L received rhLH at a fixed dose of 75 IU (1 ampoule) throughout the treatment period.
                The total dose of rhFSH, number of growing follicles, and serum concentrations of estradiol (E2) on the day of hCG administration were similar in both treatment groups. However, the percentage of metaphase II oocytes and fertilization rate were significantly higher in group F than in group L. The lower fertilization rates associated with rhLH were also seen in a subgroup of patients from group L who had undergone a previous ART cycle stimulated with FSH only and thus acted as their own controls. However, when in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were considered separately, differences in fertilization rates were statistically significant only for oocytes treated by conventional IVF.
                This study shows that the addition of recombinant LH to recombinant FSH in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing ART does not improve the ovarian response and even may have a negative impact on oocyte maturation and fertilization. A protocol utilizing both leuprolide acetate (LA) and norethindrone acetate (NETA) in subjects undergoing ovarian suppression prior to follicle aspiration proved more effective than LA alone in reducing the incidence of ovarian cyst formation without affecting clinical outcome. Patients (n = 105) undergoing ovarian stimulation followed by follicle aspiration and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) were prospectively randomized and studied. Study measures included ovarian suppression days, days of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) stimulation, serum oestradiol concentrations, number of cycles developing de novo cysts (>15 mm), number of induced flare responses (day 8 oestradiol >=50 pg/ml), number of office visits, total dose exogenous gonadotrophins, number oocytes retrieved, and clinical pregnancy and delivery rates per retrieval. Patients undergoing IVF received either LA alone (n = 58; controls) or LA and NETA (n = 47; study group) for the first 8 days of their cycle. Results comparing NETA/LA versus LA demonstrated: serum oestradiol 20.7 +/- 3.9 versus 57.3 +/- 9.4 pg/ml respectively on day 8 of ovarian suppression (P P < 0.01); and only three individuals (6.4%) using NETA/LA developed ovarian cysts >15 mm compared to 15 (25.9%) controls (P < 0.01). No differences were observed for days of stimulation, peak oestradiol attained, total dosage of exogenous gonadotrophins, or number of aspirated oocytes. Neither were there differences in the clinical pregnancy (26.8 versus 22.6%) nor in delivery rates (19.5 versus 20. 8%). We conclude that the addition of NETA to LA enhances ovarian suppression and lessens ovarian cyst formation, thereby significantly decreasing the overall cost per cycle. In an open, randomized study in an outpatient clinic of a large teaching hospital, thirty-one female volunteers with regular cycles and established ovulation by ultrasonography were given one of two triphasic oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol combined with levonorgestrel or desogestrel during six cycles of treatment. The main outcome measures were transvaginal ultrasonography and serum E2 and P measurements in pill cycles 1, 3 and 6. No ovarian activity was found in 10 subjects. Among the remaining 21 women who showed ovarian activity, most follicle-like structures developed in the pill-free week and decreased in size or disappeared in the first pill week. One women taking triphasic desogestrel had evidence of a luteinized unruptured follicle and one women taking triphasic levonorgestrel had a possible ovulation. The latter women also showed symptoms of lower abdominal pain. A statistically significant difference in ovarian activity between the two oral contraceptives could not be established. The two triphasic oral contraceptives suppressed ovarian activity to the same degree. A trend was seen towards increasing ovarian activity with duration of use in both treatment groups. To test the hypothesis that in couples undergoing IUI, actively managed cycles using clomiphene citrate (CC) stimulation, ultrasound monitoring, and hCG timing will result in increased pregnancy rate (PR) per cycle compared with unstimulated urinary LH-timed cycles.
                Fifty-six couples with unexplained infertility (n = 26) or male factor infertility (n = 30) participated in the study.
                Tertiary academic medical center.
                Prospective, randomized, crossover. Couples were randomized initially to one of the two study groups (treatment A: LH-timed IUI; treatment B: CC-stimulated, hCG-timed IUI). If no pregnancy occurred, each couple alternated between the two regimens during subsequent cycles, up to a total of four cycles.
                Twenty-nine couples completed the study and the analysis of 95 cycles revealed that among the male factor infertility group, one pregnancy occurred during the 26 cycles of each treatment group (PR per cycle of 3.9% for both treatment groups). In contrast, among the unexplained infertility group, there was a marked difference in the effect of treatments. During treatment A only one pregnancy occurred in 20 cycles (PR of 5% per cycle) whereas during treatment B, six pregnancies occurred in 23 cycles (PR of 26.1% per cycle).
                If IUI is chosen as the treatment modality in unexplained infertility, the addition of active ovulation management that includes CC stimulation, ultrasound monitoring of folliculogenesis, and hCG timing of ovulation increases the PR per cycle. In couples with male infertility, PR per cycle is low and is apparently not affected by the addition of active ovulation management. Improved understanding of follicular dynamics has led to a reevaluation of suppression of adrenal androgens in ovulation induction. To test whether adrenal suppression during clomiphene citrate (CC) therapy would improve ovulation/pregnancy rates, 64 anovulatory patients who had not previously received CC were randomly assigned to receive either 50 mg CC on days 5 to 9 alone or with 0.5 mg dexamethasone (CC + DEX). Patients were then screened for dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) (normal range, 80 to 320 micrograms/dl), prolactin, testosterone, and semen analysis of the partner. Nine patients discontinued participation prior to completing the first treatment cycle, and ten patients were found to have either elevated prolactin (4), severe male factors (3), or tubal disease (3) and were discontinued. CC was increased 50 mg/day per cycle through 150 mg/day until ovulation occurred. Once the patient was ovulatory on therapy, a properly timed postcoital test and endometrial biopsy for luteal phase defect were performed. If anovulatory at 150 mg/day of CC or demonstrating abnormal postcoital test or endometrial biopsy at 150 mg/day of CC, patients were crossed to the other arm of the treatment protocol. The results revealed a significantly higher rate of ovulation (P less than 0.01) and conception (P less than 0.05) in the CC + DEX-treated group. When correlated with DHEA-S levels, this improvement occurred in patients with DHEA-S greater than 200 micrograms/dl (P less than 0.05). Human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) was administered to 10 patients with polycystic ovarian disease (PCOD) who had failed to ovulate in response to clomiphene citrate. Five patients (group 1) were treated with intramuscular hMG injections daily, on an individually adjusted regimen. Five others (group 2) were stimulated with subcutaneous hMG in a pulsatile fashion by means of a portable infusion minipump. The pulse doses ranged between 3.5 and 7.7 IU FSH per pulse at a constant frequency of 90 minutes. Sixteen of 18 treatment cycles were ovulatory, 9 under intramuscular, and 7 under subcutaneous treatment. A total of two patients conceived with singleton pregnancies, one in each treatment group. Neither ovarian hyperstimulation nor complications of injections were noted. The amount of subcutaneous hMG required to achieve ovulation was significantly less (46.5%; P less than .001) than that needed with intramuscular administration. However, there were no differences in the duration of stimulation periods, the lengths of luteal phases, or serum E2 and gonadotropin levels between the groups. In conclusion, pulsatile subcutaneous hMG administration may be an alternative delivery mode for patients with PCOD. This randomized controlled trial compared spontaneous ovulation versus hCG-triggered ovulation in anovulatory women treated with clomiphene citrate. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of ovulation and pregnancy rates. To determine which protocols work better between cetrorelix and long protocols in older patients in a randomized controlled study.
                A controlled randomized study in a single private IVF center.
                Infertile women referred to a private IVF center.
                Five hundred sixty-four women 40 years or older undergoing IVF.
                At their first IVF cycle, the women were randomized into two study groups using a computer-generated number sequence: 281 cases were treated with the cetrorelix protocol, and 283 patients were treated with a long protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.
                Days of stimulation, E(2) on the day of hCG administration, amount of FSH administered, number of oocytes yielded, number of embryos obtained, pregnancy rate, and implantation rate.
                Patients treated with the long protocol showed a significantly higher number of oocytes retrieved and a higher pregnancy rate for both the cycle and transfer with respect to the cetrorelix protocol patients. The other parameter evaluated did not show any statistically significant differences.
                Our study showed that the long protocol performed better in older women than the cetrorelix protocol and that the GnRH antagonist may be detrimental in older women. In this randomized crossover trial we investigated whether the use of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin in couples with male subfertility leads to a higher probability of conception when intrauterine insemination (IUI) is applied. We also investigated whether the efficacy of IUI in natural or stimulated cycles was related to the severity of male subfertility. Seventy-four couples completed 308 treatment cycles. Thirteen pregnancies occurred after IUI in a natural cycle (pregnancy rate per completed cycle: 8.4%) and 21 after IUI in a stimulated cycle (pregnancy rate per completed cycle: 13.7%). The difference between the two treatment modalities was not statistically significant. The efficacy of IUI in stimulated cycles was related to the severity of the semen defect. In couples with a total motile sperm count < 10 x 10(6), ovarian stimulation did not improve treatment outcome, while it did in couples with a total motile sperm count > or = 10 x 10(6). Compared with the expected chance of conceiving spontaneously without treatment, both natural and stimulated cycles improved the probability of conception. We conclude that, for the group as a whole, ovarian stimulation did not improve the probability of conception. However, in couples with less severe semen defects, ovarian stimulation did improve the probability of conception.
There is no evidence of benefit in the use of ovulation suppression in subfertile women with endometriosis who wish to conceive.