Asthma self-management education program by home monitoring of peak expiratory flow. A randomized trial comparing peak expiratory flow and symptom self-management plans for patients with asthma attending a primary care clinic. Influence of peak expiratory flow monitoring on an asthma self-management education programme. Controlled trial evaluation of an asthma education programme for adults. Evaluation of individualized asthma self-management programs. Evaluation of peak flow and symptoms only self management plans for control of asthma in general practice. Improving asthma outcomes and self-management behaviors of inner-city children: a randomized trial of the Health Buddy interactive device and an asthma diary. Prospective controlled evaluation of the effect of a community based asthma education centre in a multiracial working class neighbourhood. An evaluation of a self-management program for adults with asthma. An asthma self-management program for children, including instruction in peak flow monitoring by school nurses. Asthma self-management: do patient education programs always have an impact? Peak flow based asthma self-management: a randomised controlled study in general practice. British Thoracic Society Research Committee. Reductions in hospital use from self management training for chronic asthmatics. Teaching self-management skills to asthmatic children and their parents in an ambulatory care setting. A randomized trial of peak-flow and symptom-based action plans in adults with moderate-to-severe asthma. A randomized trial to improve self-management practices of adults with asthma. Randomised trial of an asthma self-management programme for adults. Effectiveness of routine self monitoring of peak flow in patients with asthma. Grampian Asthma Study of Integrated Care (GRASSIC). Can small group education and peer review improve care for patients with asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? [Outcome of structured asthma education in childhood and adolescence]. Effect of patient education on self-management skills and health status in patients with asthma: a randomized trial. Measurement of outcomes in adults receiving pharmaceutical care in a comprehensive asthma outpatient clinic. Peak flow monitoring for guided self-management in childhood asthma: a randomized controlled trial. A study of a Self-Care Rehabilitation Program in pediatric asthma. The effect of a peak flow-based action plan in the prevention of exacerbations of asthma. Asthma at the interface: bridging the gap between general practice and a district general hospital. An assessment of the value of health education in the prevention of childhood asthma. An internet-based interactive telemonitoring system for improving childhood asthma outcomes in Taiwan. Evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of adult asthma education in a hospital setting.
A prospective controlled trial of home monitoring of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was conducted to determine the usefulness of an objective measure of lung function in association with an education program and a medication self-management plan in reducing morbidity in adult patients with asthma. Thirty-five patients managed themselves, using peak flow readings as the basis for the therapeutic plan coupled with educational intervention, whereas 35 control patients used symptoms and spirometric data for following physicians' treatment plans. After a 6-mo study period, patients in the experimental group showed statistically significant improvements in morbidity parameters (days lost from work, acute asthma attacks, days on antibiotic therapy, physician consultations, and emergency room admissions for asthma), increases in FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC, mean PEFR and mean morning PEFR, decrease in percentage of the mean PEFR amplitude, and a reduction in the use of inhaled beta-agonists, oral theophylline, and oral prednisone. Although improvements in some of these parameters were also found in the control group, they did not reach the levels of significance obtained in the experimental group. The personal use of an objective measure of lung function in association with a medication self-management plan leads to improvement in the patient's condition. Great emphasis is placed on educating asthmatics to use action plans to achieve better control of symptoms. The use of peak flow meters (PFM) has been recommended as an important part of self-management plans. We studied 92 (47 F) adult patients with asthma in a primary care setting to compare the effectiveness of action plans using either peak flow monitoring or symptoms to guide self-management. Each patient was instructed in the use of the action plan in the context of a 6-mo asthma education program taught by a nurse. Patients were already using inhaled corticosteroids or were newly prescribed corticosteroids by their family physician. Forty-four patients were randomized to the PFM group and 48 to the symptoms group. Spirometry, symptom scores, quality of life, medication use, and measures of health care utilization and morbidity (emergency department visits, hospitalizations, unscheduled doctor visits, and days lost from work or school) were recorded at baseline and throughout the study period. PC20 methacholine was measured at the first and at the final visits. There were significant improvements within groups for FEV1, symptoms score, PC20 methacholine, and quality of life, but no between-group differences. A significant shift from higher to lower daily use of beta-agonists (p < 0.008 for both groups) and significant shifts to higher daily doses of inhaled steroids (p < 0.001) occurred in each group. Adherence to the self-management plans was only 65% in the PFM group and 52% in the symptoms group. Outcomes for health care utilization were similar except for fewer patients making unscheduled doctor visits within the PFM group. Our findings show that education, regular follow-up, and an action plan are effective in improving asthma control and quality of life, but the routine use of PFM to guide interventions is not the only way to accomplish these objectives. We assessed whether peak expiratory flow monitoring added to a self-management education programme reduced morbidity and improved pulmonary function and adherence to treatment in 100 asthma patients (aged 17-65 years) with adequate treatment and regular 1-year follow-up. Patients randomized to the experimental group used peak expiratory flow readings as the basis for their therapeutic plan coupled with educational intervention, whereas patients in the control group received the same educational intervention and used symptoms only to guide self-management. Morbidity parameters, functional status and adherence to medical regimens improved in both groups, although the percentage of patients with satisfactory adherence was significantly better in the group with peak expiratory flow monitoring (83%) than in controls (52%) (P = 0.05). The multivariate analysis showed that severity of asthma (odds ratio 9.28, 95% confidence interval 1.87-45.96, P = 0.006 for moderate asthma) and type of self-management education programme (odds ratio: 6.19; 95% confidence interval: 2.04-18.81; P = 0.001 for the use of peak expiratory flow readings) were the only independent predictors of adherence to treatment. However, a statistically significant association between adherence and use of peak expiratory flow monitoring was only found in patients with moderate asthma (P = 0.0009). We conclude that peak expiratory flow monitorization in optimal conditions (adequate medical regimen, individualized self-management education and regular follow-up) showed a beneficial effect on adherence to prescribed regimens only in patients with moderate asthma. To improve asthma control and reduce readmission rates through increased knowledge and the development of self management skills, a brief (three hour) adult education programme was developed.
                The course was designed to improve inhaler skills and to teach how to adjust drug doses according to peak flow (PEF) measurements and a treatment plan. It was evaluated in a randomised controlled trial in 76 patients admitted to hospital for asthma by using questionnaires, spirometry, and home monitoring of PEF at entry and at five and 10 months after intervention. The questionnaire provided measures of knowledge about asthma, self management behaviour appropriate to asthma control, asthma symptom frequency and severity, and psychosocial disturbance attributable to asthma.
                During the 10 months observation period the readmission rate for the educated group was one seventh that of the control group and attendance at accident and emergency departments also decreased. No consistent differential improvements were observed in spirometric results, average PEF, or mean daily variability of PEF. Both groups showed improvements in measures of asthma knowledge, behaviour, symptoms, and psychosocial disturbances. However, the intervention group showed a significantly greater improvement in some measures of asthma knowledge and self management skills.
                Despite minimal effect on measures of airway function, substantial changes in illness behaviour and use of health care facilities can be achieved by a brief asthma education programme. We compared the effectiveness of personalized asthma self-management recommendations with that of a group self-management program. We assigned each of 34 asthma patients randomly to one of three conditions: individualized asthma self-management, group asthma self-management, and control. We derived individualized self-management recommendations from patient recordings of asthma occurrence, asthma precipitants, and peak expiratory flow rate made during a 3-month period. The group program we used was the Wheezers Anonymous program. As compared to a control group of patients who received no self-management training, the patients in both the individualized and group condition evidenced improvement of pulmonary function, as measured daily with a home peak flow meter. The improvement was equivalent for patients in the two conditions. Patients in the individualized condition also exhibited a drop in frequency of asthma attacks, but patients in the group condition did not. We concluded that individualized asthma self-management is effective in reducing symptoms of asthma. To compare a peak flow self management plan for asthma with a symptoms only plan.
                Randomisation to one of the self management plans and follow up for a year.
                Four partner, rural training practice in Norfolk.
                115 Patients (46 children and 69 adults) with asthma who were having prophylactic treatment for asthma and attending a nurse run asthma clinic.
                The number of doctor consultations, courses of oral steroids, and short term nebulised salbutamol treatments and the number of patients who required doctor consultations, courses of oral steroids, and short term nebulised salbutamol.
                Both self management plans produced significant reductions in the outcome measures but there were no significant differences in the degree of improvement between the groups. The results were similar for children and adults. The proportions of patients requiring a doctor consultation fell from 98% (50/51) to 66% (34/51) in the peak flow group and from 97% (62/64) to 53% (34/64) in the symptoms only group and the proportions requiring oral steroids from 73% (34/46) to 47% (21/46) and 52% (31/60) to 12% (7/60). The median number of doctor consultations was reduced from 8.0 to 2.0 in the peak flow group and from 4.5 to 1.0 in the symptoms only group.
                The peak flow meter was not the crucial ingredient in the improved illness of the two groups. Teaching patients the importance of their symptoms and the appropriate action to take when their asthma deteriorates is the key to effective management of asthma. Simply prescribing peak flow meters without a system of self management and regular review will be unlikely to improve patient care. Asthma is an important cause of morbidity, absence from school, and use of health services among children. Computer-based educational programs can be designed to enhance children's self-management skills and to reduce adverse outcomes.
                To assess the effectiveness of an interactive device programmed for the management of pediatric asthma.
                A randomized controlled trial (66 participants were in the intervention group and 68 were in the control group).
                Interventions conducted at home and in an outpatient hospital clinic.
                Inner-city children aged 8 to 16 years diagnosed as having asthma by a physician.
                An asthma self-management and education program, the Health Buddy, designed to enable children to assess and monitor their asthma symptoms and quality of life and to transmit this information to health care providers (physicians, nurses, or other case managers) through a secure Web site. Control group participants used an asthma diary.
                Any limitation in activity was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included perceived asthma symptoms, absence from school, any peak flow reading in the yellow or red zone, and use of health services.
                After adjusting for covariates, the odds of having any limitation in activity during the 90-day trial were significantly (P =.03) lower for children randomized to the Health Buddy. The intervention group also was significantly (P =.01) less likely to report peak flow readings in the yellow or red zone or to make urgent calls to the hospital (P =.05). Self-care behaviors, which were important correlates of asthma outcomes, also improved far more for the intervention group.
                Compared with the asthma diary, monitoring asthma symptoms and functional status with the Health Buddy increases self-management skills and improves asthma outcomes. Previous work has indicated a high rate of non-attendance at hospital based clinics among young, multiracial asthmatic patients of lower socioeconomic class. The efficacy of delivering asthma education from a community health centre established in a multiracial working class neighbourhood was evaluated.
                A prospective controlled study was performed in which asthmatic subjects aged between two and 55 years attending a hospital emergency room with acute asthma and living within a defined geographical area of high emergency room users were randomised to the usual follow up or the education centre plus usual follow up. Measurements were taken at entry into the study and again nine months later.
                At nine months patients randomised to the education centre had more preventive medications, more peak expiratory flow meters and better flow meter technique, more self-management plans, better knowledge of appropriate action to take when confronted with worsening asthma, less nocturnal awakening, and better self-reported asthma control than the control group. There was no difference between the study groups in measurements of compliance, hospital admission, days lost from school or work, or emergency room use.
                The main effects of education were on asthma knowledge and self-management skills, whilst improvements in asthma morbidity were small. Potential reasons for this include heterogeneous study population (in terms of baseline self-management skills, asthma severity, ethnicity and age), pragmatic study design, insensitivity of many of the measurements of morbidity, the modest effectiveness of a single time limited education programme, and inability to limit the effects of such a large community based study to the intervention group (there was a 67% reduction in asthma admissions during the study period from the geographical area targeted compared with a 22% reduction for the rest of Auckland). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a self-management program for adults with moderate to severe asthma on compliance with inhaled, prescribed, nonemergency medications; asthma symptoms; and airway obstruction. In this controlled experimental study, 55 subjects from a rural community were randomized to one of two groups. Self-efficacy theory served as the framework for this study. Primary measures included the Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) Chronolog, a journal of daily asthma concerns, and a peak-flow meter to appraise airway obstruction. Secondary measures included the Asthma Self-Management Assessment Tool (ASMAT) and the Self-Efficacy for Asthma Management Scale (SEAMS). These measures were completed pre- and post-intervention. Data analysis using descriptive and inferential statistics revealed that subjects receiving the self-management program increased compliance with inhaled medications (U = 271, p = .043). A randomized trial of an instructional method was conducted in which school nurses taught children asthma self-management principles and skills, including peak flow monitoring, in 20-min, individual sessions over an 8-week period. Thirty-six children participated. An intervention group of 18 children received the teaching sessions. A control group of 18 children received regular care by the nurses, but no teaching sessions. The sample included 64% boys, 69% African-Americans, and 69% Medicaid recipients. The average age of subjects was 10.2 years. The two groups were demographically similar, but despite random assignment, the control group had a significantly earlier age of onset of asthma and tended to have had more asthma attacks in the preceding year. These factors were statistically controlled in outcome analyses. Results of group comparisons showed no significant differences in the number of postintervention emergency room visits and days absent from school. However, nurses reported that children who practiced breathing exercises had less anxiety during exacerbations, and the nurses' knowledge of the children's baseline peak expiratory flow rates facilitated care of the children. Nurses expressed the opinion that the individual sessions with students might be useful in motivating them to participate effectively in later group sessions. The intervention was well accepted by students, parents, and nurses. We believe that this intervention is promising as a practical, low-cost approach to enhancing children's asthma self-management skills and warrants further testing in a larger sample, with the intervention conducted over a longer period. During the past 15 years, programs to improve self-management practices in adults with asthma have reported improvement in functional status and reduction of inappropriate use of health care services. However, these programs usually represent an ideal approach, applying multiple patient education methods. Consequently, when these programs are found to be efficacious, it is important to replicate the programs as well as to evaluate less complex methods that may be more appropriate for nonacademic health care settings.
                We compared the following 3 standardized self-management treatments in a randomized, controlled trial: (1) a replication of the self-management program developed at a university medical center that was previously shown to be efficacious; (2) a modified version of this program including only the core elements; and (3) a usual-care program. Outcome measures included medication and inhaler regimen adherence, asthma symptoms, respiratory illness, functional status, and use of health care resources.
                All 3 groups improved on measures of respiratory illnesses, use of health care services, and functional status. Patients in both education groups did no better than the usual-care group.
                The results are inconsistent with the results of the first asthma self-management study at this institution and with those of efficacy studies of similar programs. Two factors, selection of the patient population and historical changes in asthma treatment, most likely contributed to the lack of impact of the self-management programs. As a result of the improved standards for usual care due to both factors, the opportunity to effect patient outcomes was substantially reduced. Peak flow based asthma self-management plans have been strongly advocated in consensus statements, but convincing evidence for the effectiveness of this approach has been largely lacking.
                A randomised controlled trial was conducted in 25 general practices comparing an asthma self-management programme based on home peak flow monitoring and surgery review by a general practitioner or practice nurse with a programme of planned visits for surgery review only over a six month period.
                Seventy two subjects (33 in the self-management group and 39 in the planned visit group) completed the study protocol, but diary card data for at least three months were available on a total of 84 (39 in the self-management group and 45 in the planned visit group). Teaching self-management took longer than the planned visit review. In the self-management group home peak flow monitoring was felt to be useful by doctors and patients in 28 (85%) and 27 (82%) cases, respectively. There were no between group differences during the study period in terms of lung function, symptoms, quality of life, and prescribing costs. Only within the self-management group were improvements noted in disturbance of daily activities and quality of life. Possible explanations for these negative results include small numbers of subjects, the mild nature of their asthma, and inappropriate self-management strategies for such patients.
                Rigid adherence to long term daily peak flow measurement in the management of mild asthma in general practice does not appear to produce large changes in outcomes. Self-management and the use of prescribed peak flow meters need to be tailored to individual circumstances. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of asthma Self Management Training on the health status and resource use of patients with chronic asthma. The study consisted of a randomized control design of chronic asthmatic patients in a tertiary care center in India. The intervention group (153 patients) received four training sessions in addition to the regular care provided to the control group (150 patients). Health status and resource use were measured at baseline and over a one year follow-up period. The intervention group had significantly better health status (measured by breathing ability), fewer productive days lost, and lower resource use (hospitalizations and emergency room visits) than the control group. Total annual costs (direct and indirect) were also lower, though physician costs were not included in the assessment. Therefore, incorporation of asthma Self Management Training as part of clinical management of asthma can result in improvements in health status and reductions in hospital use. A program designed to teach self-management skills to asthmatic children and their parents was performed by a nurse-educator utilizing health education techniques. Goals included: (1) reduce frequency and severity of asthma; (2) reduce emergency room visits and hospitalizations; (3) reduce school absenteeism; (4) develop positive family self-help attitudes; and (5) incorporate patient-parent education in an office. After informed consent was obtained, 26 asthmatic children, aged 2 to 14 years, were selected and evaluated. Appropriate asthma management including avoidance, medications, and immunotherapy, if indicated, was initiated for both a study group (13 patients) and a comparison group (13 patients). Symptom and medication diaries were kept for six to 18 months. Educational intervention by a nurse-educator, including four hours of individual instruction, group classes, telephone access, and monitoring for the study patients, resulted in fewer hospitalizations and emergency room visits as compared to control patients, tenfold less school absenteeism, and fewer asthma attacks. Estimated hospital and emergency room costs were much less in the educated group. These results were accomplished by improving comprehension of and compliance with the medical management program by the study patients and their families; more medications were used and therapy for asthma was initiated earlier. Peak flow meters (PFM) continue to be recommended as an important part of asthma self-management plans. It remains unclear if there is an advantage in using PFM in people with moderate-to severe asthma who are not poor perceivers of bronchoconstriction.
                Prospective, randomized controlled trial of 134 adults with moderate-to-severe asthma who did not have evidence of poor perception of bronchoconstriction on histamine challenge testing, who were recruited from inpatients and outpatients of a university teaching hospital. Comparison was made over 12 months of the effectiveness of written action plans using either peak flow monitoring or symptoms to guide management. Subjects were contacted at monthly intervals by telephone for reinforcement and evaluation of use of the action plans, and to provide ongoing education. Spirometry and PD20 histamine were measured at 3-monthly intervals. Measures of health care utilization and morbidity (asthma exacerbations; hospitalizations; emergency department (ED) visits; days absent from work or school due to asthma; medication use and a self-rating of asthma severity) were made monthly. A psychosocial questionnaire (attitudes and beliefs, state-trait anxiety, denial) was given at entry and at 12-months or at withdrawal from the study.
                There were significant improvements for both groups for hospitalizations, ED visits, days off from school or work, and PD20 histamine, but no between-group differences. Appropriate use of action plans was 85% in the symptoms group and 86% in the PFM group. For all subjects, those who subsequently had an ED visit had significantly higher levels of denial (P=0.04) and lower scores for self-confidence (P=0.04), compared to those who did not have an ED visit.
                Use of written action plans, combined with regular contact to reinforce self-management, improved airway reactivity and reduced health care utilization. However, use of PFM was not superior to symptom-based plans. The prevalence and impact of adult asthma are substantial, and poor self-management practices, especially failures to adhere to treatment regimens, appear to be a significant problem. Desirable characteristics of an intervention program to improve self-management were identified through needs assessment and review of existing patient education resources. A comprehensive program was developed that integrated a workbook with one-to-one counseling and adherence-enhancing strategies. A longitudinal 1-year study compared patients receiving this self-management program with "usual care" patients receiving standard asthma pamphlets. Patients were randomly assigned to conditions. Baseline score and asthma severity were statistically controlled. Self-management patients had substantially better adherence than usual care patients, as well as improved functional status, at follow-up. Hospital and emergency department visits decreased in both groups but did not differ between groups. A hospital based, community service asthma education programme for adults to improve asthma knowledge, promote compliance with medication, and reduce morbidity was evaluated.
                The programme was evaluated using a randomised experimental and control group design with repeated measurements over 12 months. A volunteer community sample of 192 respondents was recruited of whom 116 satisfied the inclusion criteria. At the 12 month follow up some data were obtained for all subjects. Intervention subjects attended four 2.5 hour education sessions at weekly intervals. An asthma knowledge questionnaire was administered and compliance was assessed from diary records. Morbidity was assessed retrospectively by questionnaire, prospectively by diary, and objectively by spirometry and serial peak expiratory flow rate monitoring. The adequacy of medical treatment was also assessed. Data were collected at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at three, six, nine, and 12 months after intervention.
                Improvements occurred in knowledge and compliance in the intervention group but the impact on morbidity was modest; this was due, at least in part, to the inadequacy of medical treatment.
                Treatment of asthma should be reviewed and optimised in conjunction with self-management programmes in order to improve health outcomes. To evaluate the effectiveness of routine self monitoring of peak flow for asthma outpatients.
                Pragmatic randomised trial.
                Hospital outpatient clinics and general practices in north east Scotland.
                Use of bronchodilators and inhaled and oral steroids; number of general practice consultations and hospital admissions for asthma; sleep disturbance and other restrictions on normal activity; psychological aspects of health including perceived control of asthma.
                After one year there were no significant differences between patients randomised between self monitoring of peak flow and conventional monitoring. However, those given a peak flow meter recorded an increase in general practice consultations that was nearly significant. Among patients whose asthma was judged on entry to be more severe, those allocated to self monitoring used more than twice as many oral steroids (2.2; 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 4.6). Patients who already possessed a peak flow meter at the start of the study recorded higher morbidity over the course of the year than those eligible for randomisation.
                Prescribing peak flow meters and giving self management guidelines to all asthma patients is unlikely to improve mortality or morbidity. Patients whose asthma is severe may benefit from such an intervention. To study the effectiveness of an intensive small group education and peer review programme aimed at implementing national guidelines on asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on care provision by general practitioners (GPs) and on patient outcomes.
                A randomised experimental study with pre-measurement and post-measurement (after one year) in an experimental group and a control group in Dutch general practice.
                Two groups of GPs were formed and randomised. The education and peer review group (17 GPs with 210 patients) had an intervention consisting of an interactive group education and peer review programme (four sessions each lasting two hours). The control group consisted of 17 GPs with 223 patients (no intervention).
                Knowledge, skills, opinion about asthma and COPD care, presence of equipment in practice; actual performance about peakflow measurement, non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment; asthma symptoms (Dutch Medical Research Council), smoking habits, exacerbation ratio, and disease specific quality of life (QOL-RIQ). Data were collected by a written questionnaire for GPs, by self recording of consultations by GPs, and by a written self administered questionnaire for adult patients with asthma/COPD.
                Data from 34 GP questionnaires, 433 patient questionnaires, and recordings from 934 consultations/visits and 350 repeat prescriptions were available. Compared with the control group there were only significant changes for self estimated skills (+16%, 95% confidence interval 4% to 26%) and presence of peakflow meters in practice (+18%, p < 0.05). No significant changes were found for provided care and patient outcomes compared with the control group. In the subgroup of more severe patients, the group of older patients, and in the group of patients not using anti-inflammatory medication at baseline, no significant changes compared with the control group were seen in patient outcomes.
                Except for two aspects, intensive small group education and peer review in asthma and COPD care do not seem to be effective in changing relevant aspects of the provided care by GPs in accordance with guidelines, nor in changing patients' health status. From 1988 onwards inpatient asthma training courses have been conducted in Berlin and Osnabrück. A controlled study on asthma training was carried out from 1990 to 1992 at both centres with the support of the Robert Bosch Foundation. In the first intervention group a subsequent training course of 6 months' duration was conducted with the inclusion and participation of the relevant family doctors in addition to the main training course. Scrutiny of the result was done before (T1), directly after (T2) and 12 months subsequent to the training course (T3). Improvements are seen in somatic data or cost-relevant data (emergency referral to the hospital or family physician, inpatient hospital periods, referral because of mild obstruction, days of non-attendance in school due to illness, severity of asthma, incidence of symptoms, stress endurance in sports). There is also a marked improvement in the self-assessment ability of the children and in the management of asthma, as well as a decrease in the asthma-specific feeling of anxiety. Self-reliance and independence, as well as early intervention, are improved as seen by the parents, whereas on the other hand unfavourable factors such as arguments on the proper asthma therapy are diminished. Especially with regard to confidence in controls on the state of health or disease there are significant changes that are more marked in the group subjected to subsequent training than in the group without such additional training, compared with the control group. Structured asthma training exercises a strongly positive effect on the daily management of asthma bronchiale by the families on different planes of coping with the disease. These effects are enhanced by subsequent aftercare by the family physician. Intensive care in the asthma outpatient wards alone does not sufficiently modify the factors contributing to good coping with the disease. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of a newly established education program for adults with asthma. The program was designed to improve patients' health and functional status. Hospitalized patients with asthma were randomly assigned to immediate education or a 6-month waiting list. The education program consisted of three group sessions, delivered by trained educators, and focused on improving patients' self-management skills. Of 253 eligible patients, 131 agreed to participate (66 assigned to immediate education, 65 controls) and 115 (88%) completed the follow-up assessment at 6 months. At follow-up, most indicators of self-management skills and health and functional status had improved significantly among educated patients, but similar improvements were also seen among controls. The trial arms differed significantly on only four variables: patients in the immediate-education group were more likely to develop confidence in their asthma treatment (odds ratio adjusted for baseline [OR] = 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0 to 8.1), to improve their knowledge of correct inhalation technique (OR = 2.4; 95% CI: 1.0 to 5.7), and to improve knowledge of the peak flow reading that warrants calling a physician (OR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.4 to 6.7), but they improved less on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire "activity" score (difference: -0.4 on a 1 to 7 scale; 95% CI: -0.8 to 0.0). Use of health services during follow-up was similar in the two groups. The education program did not enhance patients' health and functional status, despite improving a few self-management skills. These results underscore the need for controlled evaluations of education programs. We hypothesized that a pharmacist-provided comprehensive education program in conjunction with care provided by a pulmonologist would lead to improved economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes in adults with asthma, compared with similar patients receiving care from a pulmonologist alone. The experimental group reported receiving more information about asthma self-management (p=0.001), were more likely to monitor peak flow readings (p=0.004), and had increased satisfaction with care, and perceived higher quality of care. Both groups had less lost productivity, fewer emergency department visits, fewer hospitalizations, and fewer physician visits, as well as improvement in symptoms scores within 45 days. Both groups improved in all functional status domains except the mental component score of the SF-12. Our results show a positive impact on outcomes in adults with asthma who received pharmaceutical care. We asked whether the addition of PEF recordings to a symptom-based self-management plan improved outcome in school children with asthma. In an open-randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial, we studied children aged 7-14 years with moderate asthma. After a 4-week run-in, 90 children were randomized to receive either PEF plus symptom-based management or symptom-based management alone for 12 weeks. Thresholds for action based on PEF were 70% of best (for increasing inhaled steroids) and 50% of best (for commencing prednisolone). Children were asked to perform twice-daily spirometry at home (using an electronic recording spirometer that revealed only PEF to the study group alone) and to record a symptom diary. The mean daily symptom score was the main outcome. There were no differences between groups in mean symptom score or in spirometric lung function, PEF, quality of life score, or reported use of health services over 12 weeks. During acute episodes, children responded to changes in symptoms by increasing their inhaled steroids at a mean value of PEF of greater than 70% of best so that overall PEF did not contribute to this important self-management decision. Knowledge of PEF did not enhance self-management even during acute exacerbations. The Self-Care Rehabilitation in Pediatric Asthma (SCRPA) project was designed to ascertain the level to which children with asthma are able to acquire the asthma knowledge and skills presented in a self-management training program conducted by the American Lung Association of Utah and the effect of such training on the asthma experience. The preschool SCRPA Curriculum (ages 2-5) consisted of six 1-hour classes scheduled twice a week for 3 weeks. The first and last classes were for one or both parents only, and the middle four sessions were for the child and parent(s). The school-age SCRPA curriculum (ages 6-14) consisted of eight 90-minute classes for both child and parent(s) scheduled twice a week for 4 weeks. Private physicians referred 21 preschool children and 38 school-age children into the program. The school-age children were randomly assigned to a study or control group, and the preschool children served as their own controls. A comparison of asthma episodes during the 3 months before and after training showed a statistically significant decrease in the number of episodes but no change in severity in the preschool, school study, and school control groups. The decrease in episodes for the control groups suggest that the family record keeping required of all subjects may have a beneficial effect, a phenomenon worth further investigation. Also, the school-age group, in pre- and posttesting, demonstrated that the SCRPA curriculum increased knowledge and skills in the study group, changes not found in the control group. To determine the effect of a symptom-based and a peak flow-based action plan in preventing acute exacerbations in subjects with poorly controlled asthma.
                A randomized controlled trial in which subjects who had required urgent treatment for their asthma were allocated to receive no action plan, a symptom-based plan, or a peak flow-based action plan.
                A university hospital asthma clinic.
                One hundred fifty subjects were recruited after attending an emergency department or a clinic for urgent treatment of asthma.
                All subjects received evaluation and education for asthma before being randomly allocated to receive no action plan, a symptom-based action plan, or a peak flowmeter and a peak flow-based action plan.
                Subjects were assessed by questionnaire at 3 and 6 months after enrollment with questions relating to their asthma control and their need for urgent treatment or hospital admission for asthma.
                At 6 months after enrollment, although all three intervention groups experienced improvement in their asthma control, there was a striking reduction in emergency department visits for asthma only in the peak flow-based action plan group (p=0.006). No significant difference in emergency visits was apparent between the symptom-based action plan and no action plan groups.
                We conclude that a peak flow-based action plan is effective, at least in the short term, in protecting patients with asthma against severe exacerbations of their disease. A clinic supervised by a nurse, using principles originally developed in general practice, was established in the paediatric department of a district general hospital. A randomised controlled study was conducted comparing children admitted with asthma or attending outpatients who were given a patient education programme and self management plan (intervention group) with a control group. The study comprised 91 patients aged 3-14 years admitted for asthma or attending a hospital outpatient department from November 1989 to November 1990. Seventy seven patients completed the study and kept diaries for a median of 283 days. Patients in the intervention group had significantly less restriction of activity (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.27 to -0.01) and fewer episodes of peak flow below 30% of best (95% CI 0.03 to 1.17). Patients in the intervention group were more likely to make the correct response to an acute exacerbation of their asthma than the control group (71% v 47%, 95% CI 9.51 to 39.1). The intervention group had fewer school absences and fewer home visits by a general practitioner. There was an increase in the readmission rate for the intervention group. A subgroup of patients who self managed by doubling their use of inhaled steroids during an exacerbation performed better than those patients who only increased their bronchodilator or were managed on salbutamol or sodium cromoglycate alone. Improvements in patient follow up and the structure of the self management plans used, particularly changing the peak flow level at which inhaled steroids are doubled, may further improve the outcome of patients attending the asthma clinic. A research project, which looks at the value of health education in the prevention of childhood asthma, is described. The project was a controlled trial by a health visitor focused within the community. This exploratory research looked at three groups of children over a 2-year period, and compared the effect of: (a) individual health education, and (b) group health education. During the first year, two groups were active, one receiving individual health education, the other collecting data of the same type. During the second year, a third group was involved in health education sessions. The findings have been similar in both cases, in that both groups have demonstrated a good improvement in knowledge of asthma and its treatment. Through the active involvement of using a peakflow meter and diary records in the health education programme, both groups receiving health education have shown a significant improvement in the morbidity indicators related to night symptoms and restricted activities. The qualitative analysis of the research also highlighted the value parents of asthmatic children place on counselling. A randomized, controlled trial was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Blue Angel for Asthma Kids, an Internet-based interactive asthma educational and monitoring program, used in the management of asthmatic children. One hundred sixty-four (n = 164) pediatric patients with persistent asthma were enrolled and randomized into two study groups for a 12-week controlled trial. The intervention group had 88 participants who were taught to monitor their peak expiratory flows (PEF) and asthma symptoms daily on the Internet. They also received an interactive response consisting of a self-management plan from the Blue Angel monitoring program. The control group had 76 participants who received a traditional asthma care plan consisting of a written asthma diary supplemented with instructions for self-management. Disease control was assessed by weekly averaged PEF values, symptom scores, and asthma control tests. Adherence measures were assessed by therapeutic and diagnostic monitoring. Outcome was assessed by examining quality of life and retention of asthma knowledge. The data were analyzed by comparing results before and after the trial. At the end of trial, the intervention group decreased nighttime (-0.08 +/- 0.33 vs. 0.00 +/- 0.20, p = 0.028) and daytime symptoms (-0.08 +/- 0.33 vs. 0.01 +/- 0.18, p =0.009); improved morning (241.9 +/- 81.4 vs. 223.1 +/- 55.5, p =0.017) and night PEF (255.6 +/- 86.7 vs. 232.5 +/- 55.3, p =0.010); increased adherence rates (p < 0.05); improved well-controlled rates (70.4% vs. 55.3%, p < 0.05); improved knowledge regarding self-management (93.2% vs. 70.3%, p < 0.05); and improved quality of life (6.5 +/- 0.5 vs. 4.3 +/- 1.2 on a 7-point scale, p < 0.05) when compared with conventional management. The Internet-based asthma telemonitoring program increases selfmanagement skills, improves asthma outcomes, and appears to be an effective and well-accepted technology for the care of children with asthma and their caregivers. Although patient education is a key step in the Australian Asthma Management Plan, its impact has not been assessed in a hospital outpatient asthma clinic.
                A controlled trial was undertaken in 125 adults with asthma recruited from the Alfred Hospital Asthma and Allergy Clinic and randomly allocated to an intervention (n = 64) or control (n = 61) group. Subjects in the intervention group attended three education sessions, each of 90 minutes duration, spread over three successive weeks. Asthma knowledge, quality of life, self-management skills, and attitudes and beliefs about asthma were assessed by questionnaires at baseline and after six months. The intervention group was also assessed immediately after the three education sessions. The control group was evaluated after six months of usual care.
                Asthma knowledge improved significantly in the intervention group after three education sessions (p = 0.0001) and this was retained six months later (p = 0.03). The impact of asthma on quality of life decreased significantly immediately after intervention (p = 0.03) but this was not maintained six months later (p = 0.35). On the other hand, the intervention had little impact on self-management skills or attitudes and beliefs about asthma. However, the control group had also improved their knowledge, quality of life and self-management skills after six months of usual care. The difference in mean change in knowledge score at six months between the intervention and control groups was not significant (p = 0.51).
                In contrast to some other studies, a limited asthma education programme in a hospital outpatient setting had a positive impact on patients' knowledge of asthma, but not on their quality of life, self-management skills, or attitudes and beliefs about asthma.
Education in asthma self-management which involves self-monitoring by either peak expiratory flow or symptoms, coupled with regular medical review and a written action plan improves health outcomes for adults with asthma. Training programmes that enable people to adjust their medication using a written action plan appear to be more effective than other forms of asthma self-management.