Cyclosporin versus cyclophosphamide for patients with steroid-dependent and frequently relapsing idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Chlorambucil treatment of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Eight and 12 week courses of cyclophosphamide in nephrotic syndrome. Cyclosporin A is superior to cyclophosphamide in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome-a randomized controlled multicentre trial by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie. Long-term results of two unconventional agents in steroid-dependent nephrotic children. Effect of cytotoxic drugs in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome with and without steroid dependence. A randomized study of two long-course prednisolone regimens for nephrotic syndrome in children. A randomized study comparing methylprednisolone plus chlorambucil versus methylprednisolone plus cyclophosphamide in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Efficacy of intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide treatment versus combination of intravenous dexamethasone and oral cyclophosphamide treatment in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Pulse cyclophosphamide therapy in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Oral cyclophosphamide versus chlorambucil in the treatment of patients with membranous nephropathy and renal insufficiency. Use of levamisole in maintaining remission in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children. Ineffectiveness of cyclosporine as an adjuvant to corticosteroids in the treatment of pemphigus. Intravenous dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in comparison with oral methylprednisolone-azathioprine therapy in patients with pemphigus: results of a multicenter prospectively randomized study. Comparative study of prednisolone alone and prednisolone plus fusidic acid in the treatment of children with steroid-responsive nephrotic syndrome. A multicenter trial of mizoribine compared with placebo in children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Chlorambucil dosage in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome: a controlled clinical trial. EULAR randomised controlled trial of pulse cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone versus continuous cyclophosphamide and prednisolone followed by azathioprine and prednisolone in lupus nephritis.
To compare the efficacy (maintenance of remission), safety and tolerability of cyclosporin (CsA) with those of cyclophosphamide in patients with steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (NS).
                Open, prospective, randomized, multicentre, controlled study for parallel groups, stratified for adults and children. The setting was in nephrological departments in Italy.
                Seventy-three patients with steroid-sensitive idiopathic NS admitted to the study were randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide (2.5 mg/kg/day) for 8 weeks or CsA (5 mg/kg/day in adults, 6 mg/kg/day in children) for 9 months, tapered off by 25% every month until complete discontinuation at month 12. Seven patients lost to follow up were not considered in the analysis. The remaining 66 patients were followed up for 3-24 months after randomization.
                Relapse-free survival; number of N.S. relapses/patient/year; cumulative dose of prednisone/patient; laboratory investigations (kidney and liver functions, haematological parameters); incidence of adverse events.
                At month 9, 26 of 35 CsA-treated patients were still in complete remission and a further five patients were in partial remission; 18 of 28 cyclophosphamide-treated patients were in complete remission, and one in partial remission (P = NS). No difference between adults and children was seen with either treatment. The risk of relapse was similar between frequent relapsers (19 of 22) and steroid-dependent patients (8 of 14) given CsA, and those given cyclophosphamide (5 of 15 and 6 of 15). The mean number of relapses per year and the mean dose of prednisone per year were significantly less (P < 0.001) in both groups for the experimental year than for the year before randomization. At 2 years, 25% of the patients given CsA (50% adults and 20% children) and 63% of those given cyclophosphamide (40% adults and 68% children) had not had any relapse of NS. Tolerance to the two drugs was generally good. The CsA-related side-effects were mild and disappeared after drug discontinuation.
                This study shows that both treatments are effective and well tolerated; more patients given cyclophosphamide had stable remissions. Chlorambucil, in combination with prednisone, was compared with prednisone alone in a randomized controlled trial in 21 children with either steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome to assess its effect on the duration of remission and the rate of relapse. All control patients treated with prednisone alone continued to relapse at the same rate, with all patients experiencing a return of proteinuria by seven months. Conversely, those who received the same prednisone therapy along with chlorambucil for six to 12 weeks remained in complete remission, without further medication, during 12 to 34 months of follow-up observation. Complications were minimal. Immediate side effects commonly reported with cyclophosphamide were not seen with chlorambucil. Comparison with published reports also suggests that remission induced by chlorambucil is more stable than that after cyclophosphamide. Chlorambucil appears to be of value in the frequently relapsing nephrotic patient, adding an effect that is unattainable with prednisone alone. Seventy-three children with steroid dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome were randomly allocated to receive treatment with cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day) for either eight or 12 weeks, in combination with prednisolone. All patients had previously relapsed while the dosage was being reduced or within 14 days of discontinuing prednisolone in the six months before receiving cyclophosphamide treatment (steroid dependent), and had severe steroid toxicity. Thirty two patients were treated with cyclophosphamide for eight weeks, and 41 for 12 weeks. There were no differences between the two groups in age at onset of nephrosis or entry into the study, sex ratio, duration of nephrosis, number of relapses before entry, and follow up period after entry. The relapse free rate of patients treated for eight weeks (25%) was similar to that of those treated for 12 weeks (24%) five years after stopping the treatment, and the mean relapse free interval and the sparing effect of cyclophosphamide (if any) on subsequent treatment with steroids did not differ between the groups. We conclude that cyclophosphamide should be used for no longer than eight weeks at a dose of 2 mg/kg/day in children with steroid dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome. First line immunosuppressive treatment in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children is still open to discussion. We conducted a controlled multicentre randomized open label trial to test the efficacy and safety of cyclosporin A (CSA) versus cyclophosphamide pulses (CPH) in the initial therapy of children with newly diagnosed primary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and histologically proven minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or mesangial hypercellularity. Patients in the CSA group (n = 15) were initially treated with 150 mg/m(2) CSA orally to achieve trough levels of 120-180 ng/ml, while patients in the CPH group (n = 17) received CPH pulses (500 mg/m(2) per month intravenous). All patients were on alternate prednisone therapy. Patients with proteinuria >40 mg/m(2) per hour at 12 weeks of therapy were allocated to a non-responder protocol with high-dose CSA therapy or methylprednisolone pulses. At week 12, nine of the 15 (60%) CSA patients showed at least partial remission, evidences by a reduction of proteinuria <40 mg/h per m(2). In contrast, three of the 17 (17%) CPH patients responded (p < 0.05, intention-to-treat). Given these results, the study was stopped, in accordance with the protocol. After 24 weeks, complete remission was reached by two of the 15 (13%) CSA and one of the 17 (5%) CPH patients (p = n.s.). Partial remission was achieved by seven of the 15 (46%) CSA and two of the 15 (11%) CPH patients (p <0.05). Five patients in the CSA group and 14 patients in the CPH group were withdrawn from the study, most of them during the non-responder protocol. The number of adverse events was comparable between both groups. We conclude that CSA is more effective than CPH in inducing at least partial remission in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children. Children with steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome are prone to serious steroid side effects. Alternative therapies, such as oral cyclophosphamide, may also have serious side effects. We conducted this novel prospective study to compare the long-term efficacies of levamisole and I.V. pulse cyclophosphamide as therapies with potentially fewer side effects. This study included 40 children with idiopathic steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome (age 3-15 years; 31 boys and 9 girls). The patients were randomized into two equal groups. One group received levamisole 2.5 mg/kg on alternate days (levamisole group) while the other group received I.V. cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/month for six months (cyclophosphamide group). Prednisolone was gradually withdrawn. After stopping treatment, the number of patients that maintained remission was five (25%) in each group at six months, four (20%) versus two (10%) at one year and three (15%) versus one (5%) at two years in the levamisole and cyclophosphamide groups respectively, and one (5%) in each group at three and four years. The overall side effects were mild and both drugs were well tolerated. In view of the results, we recommend trial of levamisole before adopting other therapies with more serious side effects in such patients. In a prospective, controlled study, 50 children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome who had steroid toxicity were treated for eight weeks with either cyclophosphamide (2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) or chlorambucil (0.15 mg per kilogram per day), in combination with prednisone in tapering doses. Of the 34 children shows relapses had tended to occur after the prednisone dosage had been reduced or immediately after the drug was discontinued (the steroid-dependent group), 22 also had early relapses after cytotoxic-drug treatment. In contrast, cytotoxic drug treatment produced long-lasting remissions in 12 of the 16 children whose relapses usually occurred after prednisone treatment had been interrupted for more than 14 days (the non-steroid-dependent group). The difference in response between the two groups was highly significant (P less than 0.001). We conclude that patients with frequent relapses without steroid dependence can be treated successfully with an eight-week course of cytotoxic drugs, whereas those with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome do not profit from cytotoxic drugs in the low doses used. Long-course prednisolone regimens have been shown to be more effective than short-course regimens in sustaining remission of nephrotic syndrome in children. However, the most beneficial approach among the long-course regimens remains unknown.
                Seventy-three children with new-onset nephrotic syndrome were allocated at random to the two long-course regimens and followed up for 2 years. Group A was administered prednisolone at a daily dose of 60 mg/m2 for 6 weeks, followed by an alternate-day dose of 40 mg/m2 for 6 weeks (the long daily regimen). Group B was administered the same daily dose for 4 weeks, followed by an alternate-day dose of 60 mg/m2 for 4 weeks, and doses were tapered by 10 mg/m2 every 4 weeks (the long alternate-day regimen).
                Group B had a lower incidence of corticosteroid toxicities than group A during the initial treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the sustained remission rate of the two treatment groups showed a marginally significant difference (P = 0.069) and showed a significant difference when patients were stratified for age of disease onset (P = 0.048). In a subgroup of younger children (<4 years at onset), group B had a greater rate of sustained remission (P < 0.01) and fewer children with frequent relapses (P < 0.05) than group A, whereas in older children (> or =4 years at onset), both groups had similar good sustained remission rates.
                These findings collectively indicate that the long alternate-day regimen may be more beneficial, with less corticosteroid toxicities, than the long daily regimen, and children with younger age at disease onset may be susceptible to relapse and especially benefit from the long alternate-day regimen for sustaining remission of the disease. To assess whether chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide may have a better therapeutic index in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy, we compared two regimens based on a 6-mo treatment, alternating every other month methylprednisolone with chlorambucil or methylprednisolone with cyclophosphamide. Patients with biopsy-proven membranous nephropathy and with a nephrotic syndrome were randomized to be given methylprednisolone (1 g intravenously for 3 consecutive days followed by oral methylprednisolone, 0.4 mg/kg per d for 27 d) alternated every other month either with chlorambucil (0.2 mg/kg per d for 30 d) or cyclophosphamide (2.5 mg/kg per d for 30 d). The whole treatment lasted 6 mo; 3 mo with corticosteroids and 3 mo with one cytotoxic drug. Among 87 patients followed for at least 1 yr, 36 of 44 (82%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 67.3 to 91.8%) assigned to methylprednisolone and chlorambucil entered complete or partial remission of the nephrotic syndrome, versus 40 of 43 (93%; 95% CI, 80.9 to 98.5%) assigned to methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide (P = 0.116). Of patients who attained remission of the nephrotic syndrome, 11 of 36 in the chlorambucil group (30.5%) and 10 of 40 in the cyclophosphamide group (25%) had a relapse of the nephrotic syndrome between 6 and 30 mo. The reciprocal of plasma creatinine improved in the cohort groups followed for 1 yr for both treatment groups (P < 0.01) and remained unchanged when compared with basal values in the cohort groups followed for 2 and 3 yr. Six patients in the chlorambucil group and two in the cyclophosphamide group did not complete the treatment because of side effects. Four patients in the chlorambucil group but none in the cyclophosphamide group suffered from herpes zoster. One patient per group developed cancer. It is concluded that in nephrotic patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy both treatments may be effective in favoring remission and in preserving renal function for at least 3 yr. We compared, in a randomized controlled trial, the efficacy of a regimen based on intravenous (i.v.) cyclophosphamide therapy with a combination of i.v. dexamethasone and oral cyclophosphamide therapy in inducing remission in patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). During April 2001 to December 2003, 52 consecutive patients with idiopathic SRNS, normal renal function and renal histology findings showing minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis were enrolled into the study. Patients in group I received i.v. injection of cyclophosphamide once a month for 6 months and prednisolone on alternate days. Those in group II received i.v. treatment with dexamethasone (initially on alternate days, later fortnightly and monthly; total 14 doses), oral cyclophosphamide therapy (for 3 months) and prednisolone on alternate days. Data from 49 patients (26 in group I, 23 in group II) were analyzed; their clinical and biochemical features were similar at inclusion. Following treatment, complete remission was seen in 53.8% and 47.8% patients in groups I and II, respectively (P = 0.6). Long-term follow up showed favorable outcome in 14 (53.8%) patients in group I, and 9 (39.1%) in group II. Chief adverse effects, including cushingoid features and serious infections, were similar in both groups. Patients receiving i.v. dexamethasone therapy commonly showed hypertension and hypokalemia, while vomiting and reversible alopecia occurred in those receiving i.v. treatment with cyclophosphamide. In patients with SRNS, the efficacy of treatment intravenously with cyclophosphamide and orally with prednisolone was similar to the combination of dexamethasone intravenously, orally administered cyclophosphamide and prednisolone. Intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCP) has been shown to be effective in lupus nephritis. This is a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of IVCP with oral cyclophosphamide (OCP) in patients with steroid-dependent (SD) idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). Forty-seven consecutive children who were SD were randomized to receive either OCP (2 mg/kg per dayx12 weeks) or IVCP (500 mg/m(2) per month IVx6 months) after achieving a steroid-induced remission. The response was evaluated in terms of remission, change in steroid response status, duration of remission (i.e., proteinuria-free days), side effects, and compliance. Of the 47, IVCP was given to 26 children and OCP to 21 children. The demographic data, histopathology, biochemical profile, and duration of follow-up in the two groups were similar. On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the median proteinura-free time was 360+/-88 days compared with 96+/-88 days in the OCP group (values median+/-SE, log rank P=0.05). The actuarial cumulative sustained remission in our study was 73% in IVCP compared with 38.1% in OCP at 6 months after therapy, but was almost identical (18.6% in IVCP vs. 19%in OCP) after 2 years. Thus in our study the overall improvement in steroid response category from SD to sustained remission, infrequent relapser, and frequent relapser (88% in IVCP vs. 57% in OCP) was significantly better in the IVCP group, although the number of children with persistent remission tended to be similar at 2 years. Furthermore, the response was observed with a 40% lower cumulative dose than OCP. Hence, we conclude that IVCP is a safe and effective therapeutic modality in children with INS who are SD. We treated patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMGN) and renal insufficiency, using: (i) (n = 15) monthly cycles of steroids (1 g methyl-prednisolone i.v. on three consecutive days, followed by oral prednisone 0.5 mg/kg/day months 1, 3 and 5) and chlorambucil (0.15 mg/kg/day months 2, 4 and 6); or (ii) (n = 17) oral cyclophosphamide (1.5-2.0 mg/kg/day for 1 year) and steroids in a comparable dose. The groups were comparable in age, renal function and levels of proteinuria. During the 6 months preceding treatment, serum creatinine levels increased from 148 +/- 50 to 219 +/- 73 mumol/l in the chlorambucil group and from 164 +/- 86 to 274 +/- 126 mumol/l in the cyclophosphamide group. Median (range) follow-ups were: chlorambucil 38 months (8-71); cyclophosphamide 26 months (5-68) (NS). Renal function improved in both groups, but the improvement was short-lived in the chlorambucil group; 12 months after starting treatment, mean serum creatinine was 6.3 mumol/l lower in the chlorambucil group and 121 mumol/l lower in the cyclophosphamide group (p < 0.01). Four chlorambucil-treated patients developed ESRD, and five needed a second course of therapy, whereas only one cyclophosphamide-treated patient developed ESRD (p < 0.05). Remissions of proteinuria occurred more frequently after cyclophosphamide treatment (15/17 vs. 5/15; p < 0.01). Side-effects necessitated interruption of treatment in six patients on cyclophosphamide and in 11 on chlorambucil (p < 0.05). In our patients, oral cyclophosphamide was better tolerated than oral chlorambucil. The suggested greater efficacy of the oral cyclophosphamide regimen needs to be ascertained by longer follow-up. A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in a pediatric unit in a teaching hospital in India to assess the efficacy of levamisole in maintaining remission in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Sixty-one children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, who had achieved remission with corticosteroids, were allocated to a treatment group (33 patients) receiving levamisole (2-3 mg/kg/day) twice a week for 12 months or to a control group (28 patients) receiving no treatment. The main outcome measure was duration of remission. Thirty months later, in the levamisole group, 21 of 33 patients were in remission as against 12 of 28 patients in the control group (chi 2 = 2.54, p = 0.11, NS). The median duration of remission maintenance was 12 months in the levamisole group as compared with 10.5 months in the control group. On survival analysis, the difference in duration of remission maintenance between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.10), though there was a trend in favor of the treatment group. On stratified survival analysis, multiple relapsers in the levamisole group had longer remission maintenance than the control group though this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). The clinically significant trend towards increased duration of remission maintenance in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome observed with levamisole therapy, especially in patients with multiple relapses, may require a larger study with a longer follow-up for definitive confirmation. To compare the effectiveness and the adverse effects of 2 different regimens for the treatment of pemphigus: corticosteroids alone compared with a combination of corticosteroids and cyclosporine.
                Concurrently randomized trial.
                Tertiary care medical center.
                We studied 33 sequential hospitalized patients with newly diagnosed pemphigus vulgaris (n=29) or pemphigus foliaceous (n=4) based on clinical, histological, and immunofluorescence criteria who had not previously been treated with systemic corticosteroids or immununosuppressive drugs. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with methylprednisolone or prednisolone plus cyclosporine.
                Both groups were treated with similar initial doses of prednisolone (prednisone equivalent, 1 mg/kg), which were increased 50% every 5 to 10 days based on persistence of disease activity. One group was treated in addition with cyclosporine (5 mg/kg).
                Patients were followed up closely for clinical outcome based on time required to control active manifestations of the disease, induction of partial and complete remissions, total amount of corticosteroids administered, frequency of relapses, and development of complications.
                The 2 groups were similar in terms of demographics and baseline disease severity. There was no difference between groups in any of the variables used to measure response to treatment or total amount of corticosteroids administered. Complications were more common in patients who received combination therapy.
                Combination treatment with corticosteroids and cyclosporine, 5 mg/kg, offers no advantage over treatment with corticosteroids alone in patients with pemphigus. Pemphigus is a potentially life-threatening autoimmune blistering skin disease usually treated with high-dose corticosteroids in combination with immunosuppressive drugs. In a multicenter, prospectively randomized study we compared efficacy and side effects of a dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide (D/C) pulse therapy with a methylprednisolone-azathioprine (M/A) therapy in 22 patients with newly diagnosed pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus.
                The 11 patients of the M/A group were treated with daily doses of methylprednisolone (initially 2 mg/kg body weight) and azathioprine (2-2,5 mg/kg body weight) which were subsequently tapered. D/C pulse therapy in 11 patients consisted of intravenous administration of 100 mg dexamethasone/d on 3 consecutive days along with cyclophosphamide (500 mg) on day one. Pulses were initially repeated every 2-4 weeks and then at increasing intervals. In between the pulses, oral cyclophosphamide (50 mg) was given daily for 6 months.
                Within 24 months after treatment initiation, 5/11 patients of the D/C group had a remission (complete remissions after discontinuation of therapy in 3 patients) and 6/11 patients had a progression. In the M/A group, there were remissions in 9/11 patients (complete remissions after discontinuation of therapy in 3 patients) and progression in 1/11 patients. There were more relapses in M/A therapy after remission than in D/C therapy. Side effects were more common in the M/A group. These differences were not significant (p > 0,05).
                Because of the high number of progressions in patients treated with D/C therapy, we can not confirm the encouraging results of earlier reports about pulse D/C therapy. Nevertheless D/C therapy seemed to be better tolerated and, in case of primary efficacy, was associated with fewer recurrences than M/A therapy. There are several reports in the literature indicating that fusidic acid owns functions similar to those of cyclosporin. As cyclosporin has effectively been used in frequently relapsing steroid-responsive nephrotic syndrome we carried out this study to determine whether fusidic acid used along with prednisolone diminishes rate of steroid-responsive nephrotic syndrome relapses in children.
                The patients were randomly allocated to receive either prednisolone alone or prednisolone plus fusidic acid for two months in standard doses. In the cases of relapses the treatment was changed to the comparative treatment method. Altogether 18 children (12 boys and 6 girls) aged 1.3 to 13.2 years entered the study. Thirteen of them were treated by either method on different occasions, four patients were treated with prednisolone only, and one child was treated with prednisolone plus fusidic acid only. Thus, there were 17 evaluable treatment courses with prednisolone alone and 14 courses with prednisolone plus fusidic acid. The patients were followed-up as long as the remission lasted.
                There was prompt and complete response under the influence of both treatment methods. However, relapses occurred in all the patients irrespective of the mode of treatment. Mean duration of remissions did not differ significantly between the study groups (17.8+/-20.4 weeks in the prednisolone group and 18.3+/-23.9 weeks in the prednisolone plus fusidic acid group; p>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in laboratory parameters reflecting therapeutic efficacy in the comparative treatment groups, too.
                Thus, it was not revealed any remission-sustaining efficacy of fusidic acid used in standard doses for two months along with prednisolone in children with frequently relapsing steroid-responsive nephrotic syndrome. The use of corticosteroids or cytotoxic/immunosuppressive agents such as cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, and cyclosporine for the treatment of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) is limited because of their adverse effects. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mizoribine, a relatively new immunosuppressive drug developed in Japan, in children with FRNS.
                A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial was carried out in children, from 2 to 19 years old, with FRNS. At relapse, patients were treated with prednisolone. According to a dynamic allocation, mizoribine or a placebo was concurrently administered to each patient. Prednisolone was gradually tapered and discontinued within 12 weeks. The test drug was maintained for 48 weeks. The primary end point was the relapse rate (the total number of relapses/the total treatment days for all patients). Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.
                The primary analysis was conducted on 99 mizoribine- and 98 placebo-treated patients. The relapse rate was lower in the mizoribine group than in the placebo group (0.0055 vs. 0.0067; ratio 0.81, 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.05, P = 0.12). The hazard ratio of the cumulative remission rate between the two groups was 0.79 (95% CI, 0. 57 to 1.08). In the subgroups consisting of patients 10 years old or younger, the relapse rate ratio between the mizoribine subgroup (54 patients) and the placebo subgroup (57 patients) was 0.66 (95% CI, 0. 44 to 0.94, P = 0.017). The hazard ratio of the cumulative remission rate between the two subgroups was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.85, P = 0. 007). Hyperuricemia was the most common adverse event with mizoribine (16%), but was transient.
                Compared with the placebo, mizoribine significantly decreased the relapse rate and prolonged the remission period in the subgroup consisting of patients 10 years old or younger. This drug may be useful in young children with FRNS who generally relapse more frequently than older children. A controlled clinical trial was performed using two dosage regimens of chlorambucil to treat children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. All children concurrently received prednisone (60 mg/m2 on alternate days). Ten children (Group I) were given chlorambucil as a stable dose (0.2 mg/kg/day) for 56 to 60 days, and 11 children (Group II) received increasing doses (0.2 to 0.63 mg/kg/day) for 42 to 77 days. Two children in each group subsequently relapsed. Follow-up averaged 28.6 and 27.2 months in Groups I and II, respectively. Three children in Group II developed infectious complications. The data indicate that a stable dosage regimen for chlorambucil is as effective as an increasing dose regimen in achieving long-term remission of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. To compare the efficacy and side effects of intermittent pulse cyclophosphamide plus methylprednisolone with continuous oral cyclophosphamide plus prednisolone, followed by azathioprine, in patients with proliferative glomerulonephritis caused by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
                A multicentre randomised controlled trial was conducted between June 1992 and May 1996 involving eight European centres. All patients satisfied the American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE and had biopsy proven proliferative lupus nephritis. All received corticosteroids in addition to cytotoxic drugs, as defined in the protocol, for two years. The trial was terminated after four years as recruitment was disappointing.
                32 SLE patients with lupus nephritis were recruited: 16 were randomised to intermittent pulse cyclophosphamide and 16 to continuous cyclophosphamide plus azathioprine. Mean duration of follow up was 3.7 years in the continuous group (range 0 to 5.6) and 3.3 years in the pulse group (range 0.25 to 6). Three patients were excluded from the pulse therapy group as they were later found to have pure mesangial glomerulonephritis. Two patients in the continuous therapy group developed end stage renal failure requiring dialysis, but none in the intermittent pulse therapy (p = 0.488; NS). There were similar numbers of side effects and withdrawals from treatment in both groups. There were three deaths: two in the intermittent pulse therapy group and one in the continuous therapy group.
                There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy and side effects between the two regimens. Infectious complications occurred commonly, so careful monitoring is required during treatment.
Eight week courses of cyclophosphamide or chlorambucil and prolonged courses of cyclosporin and levamisole reduce the risk of relapse in children with relapsing SSNS compared with corticosteroids alone. Clinically important differences in efficacy are possible and further comparative studies are still needed.