Adjunctive treatment of decompression illness with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (tenoxicam) reduces compression requirement.
We report a randomized trial examining adjunctive administration of the NSAID, tenoxicam, to divers suffering with DCI. 180 subjects were graded for severity on admission and randomized according to a stratified random number schedule. Subjects were recompressed and treatment continued daily until symptom stabilization or complete resolution. Tenoxicam 20 mg or a placebo preparation was administered at the first air break during the initial recompression and continued daily for seven days. The subjects were assessed using a recovery status score at the completion of treatment and at 4-6 weeks. The proportion of patients with mild residual symptoms at discharge and final follow-up was not significantly different (discharge placebo 30% versus tenoxicam 37%, P=0.41; six weeks placebo 20% versus tenoxicam 17%, P=0.58). There was a significant reduction in the number of treatments required to achieve discharge (median treatments placebo 3, tenoxicam 2, P=0.01). 61% of patients in the tenoxicam group required less than 3 compressions, versus 40% in the placebo group (P=0.01, RRR 33 % [95%CI 9%-56%], NNT=5 [95%CI 3-18]). There was no evidence of increased complications of treatment in the tenoxicam group. When given this NSAID, patients with DCI require fewer hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) sessions to achieve a standard clinical end-point and there is likely to be an associated cost saving.
Recompression therapy is standard for the treatment of DCI, but there is no randomized controlled trial evidence for its use. Both the addition of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and the use of heliox may reduce the number of recompressions required, but neither improve the odds of recovery. The application of either of these strategies may be justified. The modest number of patients studied demands a cautious interpretation. Benefits may be largely economic and an economic analysis should be undertaken. There is a case for large randomized trials of high methodological rigour in order to define any benefit from the use of different breathing gases and pressure profiles during recompression therapy.