Effect of continuous treatment with topical corticosteroid on episodic viral wheeze in preschool children. Effect of inhaled corticosteroids on episodes of wheezing associated with viral infection in school age children: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. Children with mild asthma: do they benefit from inhaled corticosteroids? Prevention of viral induced asthma attacks using inhaled budesonide. Inhaled steroids compared with disodium cromoglycate in preschool children with episodic viral wheeze.
Acute episodic wheeze related to viral infections is a common and distressing condition and treatment remains unsatisfactory. Although some benefit from the continuous use of inhaled steroids has been demonstrated in young wheezy children, their effect primarily on acute episodes has not been considered. In this study the effect of budesonide (400 micrograms/day) was assessed in a four month double blind parallel trial, in 41 children (0.7-6.0 years) with predominantly episodic viral wheeze. Analysis of the last three months showed no difference between budesonide or placebo in mean daily total symptom score (median values 0.6 and 0.63), episode number (mean values 2.6 and 2.4), or score/episode (mean value 30 and 31). Four months of treatment with inhaled budesonide had no effect on acute episodes of wheeze in this group of children. To determine the effect of regular prophylactic inhaled corticosteroids on wheezing episodes associated with viral infection in school age children.
                Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.
                Community based study in Southampton.
                104 children aged 7 to 9 years who had had wheezing in association with symptoms of upper and lower respiratory tract infection in the preceding 12 months.
                After a run in period of 2-6 weeks children were randomly allocated twice daily inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 200 micrograms or placebo through a Diskhaler for 6 months with a wash out period of 2 months. Children were assessed monthly.
                Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1); bronchial responsiveness to methacholine (PD20); percentage of days with symptoms of upper and lower respiratory tract infection with frequency, severity, and duration of episodes of upper and lower respiratory symptoms and of reduced peak expiratory flow rate.
                During the treatment period there was a significant increase in mean FEV1 (1.63 v 1.53 1; adjusted difference 0.09 1 (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.14); P = 0.001) and methacholine PD20 12.8 v 7.2 mumol/l; adjusted ratio of means 1.7 (1.2 to 2.4); P = 0.007) in children receiving beclomethasone dipropionate compared with placebo. There were, however, no significant differences in the percentage of days with symptoms or in the frequency, severity, or duration of episodes of upper or lower respiratory symptoms or of reduced peak expiratory flow rate during the treatment period between the two groups.
                Although lung function is improved with regular beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/day, this treatment offers no clinically significant benefit in school age children with wheezing episodes associated with viral infection. In children with mild asthma, who show hardly any abnormalities in pulmonary function, objective measurement of the effect of inhaled corticosteroids is difficult. The short term effect of fluticasone propionate (FP) in these children was evaluated, using both subjective and objective parameters. A total of 68 children (5-10 yrs old) were randomly assigned to either FP 250 microg or placebo twice daily as metered-dose inhaler via spacer during 12 weeks. Symptom scores, use of rescue medication, wheezing, parent global evaluation and pulmonary function tests including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and bronchial responsiveness (provocation dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20)) were evaluated. FP-treated versus placebo-treated children showed significant changes in percentage symptom-free days, use of beta2-mimetics, morning and evening PEF, FEV1 % pred and wheezing. No significant improvements were found in parent global evaluation, absolute values of FEV1 nor PD20. These findings show that inhaled corticosteroids are effective in children with mild asthma. This effect can be assessed by both objective and subjective parameters. Early start of inhaled corticosteroids should be considered even when pulmonary function is normal. Thirty two preschool children were entered into a double blind, placebo controlled study using intermittent budesonide to treat viral induced wheeze. Active treatment was either 800 micrograms twice a day via a spacer or 1600 micrograms twice a day via a spacer and facemask in those children too young to use a mouthpiece. Treatment was started at the onset of an upper respiratory tract infection and continued for seven days or until symptoms had resolved for 24 hours. Each child remained in the study until they had completed using one pair of budesonide and placebo inhalers in random order without the need for additional oral prednisolone. Twenty five children completed 28 treatment pairs. All 25 families were asked to express a preference after completing their first treatment pair: 12 preferred budesonide and six preferred placebo; seven had no preference. Symptom scores were compared in 17 treatment pairs that were completed without the need for oral prednisolone. Mean day and night time wheeze in the first week after infection were significantly lower in those receiving budesonide. Intermittent inhalation of budesonide can modify the severity of wheezing in preschool children developing asthma after viral respiratory infections but improvements were modest with the doses used in this study. In school children with atopic asthma the beneficial effects of disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) are well-established. In preschool children, wheezing is quite common, and in the majority of cases the symptoms are episodic and reported to be associated with viral infections rather than atopy. We compared the efficacy of regular treatment with DSCG and BDP for prevention of wheezing in preschool children. We were interested to establish whether regular treatment with inhaled anti-inflammatory drugs could lead to a decrease in bronchial responsiveness. In 15 patients (median age, 56 months; range, 43-66 months) bronchial responsiveness was assessed by measuring specific airway resistance (sRaw) during a histamine provocation test. The concentration of histamine eliciting a 100% increase in sRaw (PC100his) was determined. In a double-blind crossover study, patients inhaled either DSCG 10 mg three times a day or BDP 100 microg three times a day for 2 months. After a wash-out period, treatment was changed to BDP or DSCG, respectively. Daily peak flow measurements were carried out, and exacerbations were noted. PC100his was measured at the start and end of each treatment period. No significant decrease in bronchial responsiveness was seen (PC100his DSCG: before 1.3, after 1.66 mg/ml, Pvalue not significant; BDP: before 1.1 after 1.22 mg/ml, Pvalue not significant). Significantly higher morning peak flows were observed on BDP therapy (160 on BDP vs. 150 L/min on DSCG, P < 0.03). BDP treatment resulted in significantly fewer wheezing exacerbations (7 vs. 16, P < 0.005) compared with DSCG therapy. We conclude that in preschool children with episodic virally induced wheezing, BDP therapy was superior to DSCG aerosol treatments for the prevention of exacerbations of wheezing, although no significant effect on bronchial responsiveness was noted during either treatment protocol.
Episodic high dose inhaled corticosteroids provide a partially effective strategy for the treatment of mild episodic viral wheeze of childhood. There is no current evidence to favour maintenance low dose inhaled corticosteroids in the prevention and management of episodic mild viral induced wheeze.