Optimal timing of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump support in high-risk coronary patients. Preoperative intraaortic balloon pump enhances cardiac performance and improves the outcome of redo CABG. Evaluation of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump support in high risk coronary patients. Effect of a preoperative intervention on preoperative and postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients awaiting elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A randomized, controlled trial.
Beneficial effects of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) treatment, on outcome and cost, in high-risk patients who have coronary artery bypass grafting have been demonstrated. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to determine the optimal timing for preoperative IABP support in a cohort of high-risk patients.
                Sixty consecutive high-risk patients who had coronary artery bypass grafting (presenting with two or more of the following criteria: left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.30, unstable angina, reoperation, or left main stenosis greater than 70%) entered the study. Thirty patients did not receive preoperative IABP (controls), 30 patients had preoperative IABP therapy starting 2 hours (T2), 12 hours (T12), or 24 hours (T24), by random assignment, before the operation. Fifty patients had preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction mean, less than 0.30 (less than 0.26+/-0.08), (n = 40) unstable angina, 28% (n = 17) left main stenosis, and 32% (n = 19) were reoperations.
                Cardiopulmonary bypass was shorter in the IABP groups. There was one death in the IABP group and six in the control group. The complication rate for IABP was 8.3% (n = 5) without group differences. Cardiac index was significantly higher postoperatively (p<0.001) in patients with preoperative IABP treatment compared with controls. There were no significant differences between the three IABP subgroups at any time. The incidence of postoperative low cardiac output was significantly lower in the IABP groups (p<0.001). Intubation time, length of stay in the intensive care unit and the hospital was shorter in the IABP groups (p = 0.211, p<0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively). There were no differences between the IABP subgroups in any of the studied variables.
                The beneficial effect of preoperative IABP in high-risk patients who have coronary artery bypass grafting was confirmed. There were no differences in outcome between the subgroups; therefore, at 2 hours preoperatively, IABP therapy can be started. Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (redo CABG) is associated with an increased operative risk compared with primary CABG. Because the hospital mortality in redo CABG is known to be influenced by poor left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 0.40), unstable angina, and left main stem stenosis greater than or equal to 70%, a preoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) support could be beneficial to improve the outcome in high-risk redo CABG.
                Between June 1994 and October 1996, 48 high-risk patients underwent redo CABG and were randomized into the following groups: group 1 (24 patients) who received preoperative IABP treatment on average 2 hours before cardiopulmonary bypass, and group 2 (24 patients) who received no preoperative IABP and served as controls. Mean age was 65 years and 90% (43 patients) were men. Forty-one patients had preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 0.40 (85%), 38% (18 patients) had left main stem stenosis greater than or equal to 70%, and 54% (26 patients) had unstable angina preoperatively. Preoperative patient characteristics did not differ between the groups.
                The time on cardiopulmonary bypass was shorter in group 1, 86 versus 110 minutes (p = 0.006). There were no hospital deaths in group 1, but four deaths occurred in the control group (p = 0.049). Cardiac index rose significantly preoperatively after introduction of the IABP in group 1. Cardiac index was significantly higher postoperatively in group 1 compared with group 2 and remained significantly higher during the first 24 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass. Significantly fewer patients in the IABP group had postoperative low cardiac output (4 versus 13 patients). Nine patients in group 2 required IABP support postoperatively for 4.1 +/- 1.7 days. Only 2 patients in group 1 needed IABP postoperatively, and their IABPs were successfully removed on the first postoperative day. The preoperative IABP-supported patients had a shorter intensive care unit stay, 2.4 +/- 0.8 days compared with group 2, 4.5 +/- 2.2 days (p = 0.007), as well as a shorter hospital stay. The preoperative IABP treatment was found to be cost-effective.
                Preoperative treatment with IABP in high-risk redo CABG patients is an effective modality to prepare these patients to have their myocardial revascularization in an as nonischemic situation as possible, which resulted in a significantly lower hospital mortality, fewer instances of postoperative low cardiac output, and shorter stays in both the intensive care unit and the hospital. The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is an established additional support to pharmacological treatment of the failing heart after myocardial infarction, unstable angina and cardiac surgery. The effect of preoperative IABP in high risk patients was evaluated.
                Between June 1994 and March 1996 all high risk patients for CABG (two or more of these criteria: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or = 40%, left main stem stenosis > or = 70%, REDO-CABG, unstable angina) were randomized into either of 3 groups: (1) IABP 1 day prior to surgery, (2) IABP 1-2 h prior to CPB and (3) no preoperative IABP, controls. Exclusion criteria: cardiogenic shock preoperatively. Fifty-two patients have entered the study-group 1 (13 patients), group 2 (19 patients) and group 3 (20 patients). Preoperative patient characteristics and operative data revealed no group differences. There were 56% REDO's, unstable angina 59%, LVEF < or = 40%, 87% (34.0 +/- 11.6%) and left main stem stenosis in 35%.
                The CPB-time was shorter in groups 1 and 2 88.7 +/- 20.3 min than in group 3 105.5 +/- 26.8 min, P < 0.001, while ischemia time did not differ. Hospital mortality was higher in group 3, 25% vs. 6% (groups 1 and 2). Postoperative low cardiac output was seen in 12 patients (60%) in group 3 vs. 6 patients (19%) in groups 1 and 2, P < 0.05. Cardiac index increased significantly prior to CPB in groups 1 and 2. After CPB cardiac index was significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 compared to Group 3 and continued to increase. The IABP was removed after 3.1 +/- 1.0 days in group 3 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.6 days in groups 1 and 2, P < 0.001. In group 3, 11 patients required IABP postoperatively compared to only 4 patients in groups 1 and 2. ICU stay was shorter in groups 1 and 2--2.3 +/- 0.9 days vs. 3.5 +/- 1.1 days for group 3, P = 0.004. All patients received dopamin postoperatively, however in a lower dose in groups 1 and 2, 4.5 vs. 13.5 microg/kg/min. Dobutamine was added in 23% of the patients (group 1), 32% (group 2) and 95% (group 3). Adrenalin/amrinonum was required in 40% of the patients in group 3, 5% in group 2 and none in group 1. Group 1 patients had a better improvement of cardiac performance than group 2, while other parameters did not differ. Three months follow up of hospital survivors showed no group differences.
                The use of preoperative IABP in high risk patients lowers hospital mortality and shortens the stay in ICU, due to improved cardiac performance, compared to a controls. The procedure was cost-beneficial. One day preoperative IABP treatment improves cardiac performance more than 1-2 h preoperative IABP treatment, but does not significantly affect the outcome in terms of hospital mortality or postoperative morbidity. In publicly funded health care systems, a waiting period for such services as coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is common. The possibility of using the waiting period to improve patient outcomes should be investigated.
                To examine the effect of a multidimensional preoperative intervention on presurgery and postsurgery outcomes in low-risk patients awaiting elective CABG.
                Randomized, controlled trial.
                A regional cardiovascular surgery center in a tertiary care hospital, southwestern Ontario, Canada.
                249 patients on a waiting list for elective CABG whose surgeries were scheduled for a minimum of 10 weeks from the time of study recruitment.
                During the waiting period, the treatment group received exercise training twice per week, education and reinforcement, and monthly nurse-initiated telephone calls. After surgery, participation in a cardiac rehabilitation program was offered to all patients.
                Postoperative length of stay was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were exercise performance, general health-related quality of life, social support, anxiety, and utilization of health care services.
                Length of stay differed significantly between groups. Patients who received the preoperative intervention spent 1 less day [95% CI, 0.0 to 1.0 day] in the hospital overall (P = 0.002) and less time in the intensive care unit (median, 2.1 hours [CI, -1.2 to 16 hours]; P = 0.001). During the waiting period, patients in the intervention group had a better quality of life than controls. Improved quality of life continued up to 6 months after surgery. Mortality rates did not differ.
                The waiting period for elective procedures, such as CABG, may be used to enhance in-hospital and early-phase recovery, improving patients' functional abilities and quality of life while reducing their hospital stay.
Evidence suggests that preoperative IABP may have a beneficial effect on mortality and morbidity in specific high risk patient groups undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, however there are many problems with the quality, validity and generalisability of the trials. However, the available evidence is not robust enough to extend the use of IABP to truly elective, high risk patients. Defining more precisely which patient groups may benefit would be the challenge for the future.