Ultrasound-guided testicular sperm aspiration in azoospermic patients: a new sperm retrieval method for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration versus epididymal micropuncture with perivascular nerve stimulation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection to treat unreconstructable obstructive azoospermia.
We investigated the technique of ultrasound-guided testicular sperm aspiration (USTSA) and compared it with "blind" testicular sperm aspiration (TSA) in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia.
                Thirty-nine consecutive azoospermic men underwent TSA, 16 under sonographic guidance (USTSA group) and 23 with no imaging guidance (TSA group). Clinical and hormonal evaluation and sonography of the scrotum and testes were performed 1-2 days before the procedure. The aspiration was done using short-term general anesthesia. Follow-up consisted of sonographic reexamination of the scrotum and testes immediately and 1 month after the procedure.
                Intraoperative sonography with power Doppler imaging enabled good visualization of the testicular parenchyma, easy sampling, and avoidance of prominent vessels. Sufficient material was retrieved in 15 USTSA patients (94%) and 19 TSA patients (83%). No patients needed more than 4 hours' ambulatory hospitalization after the procedure. In the remaining 5 patients, aspiration failed to yield sperm, so open biopsy was performed. In those patients, postaspiration surgical exploration revealed subtunical bleeding in 3 patients after TSA but none after USTSA. Late minor complications occurred in 2 patients (13%) in the USTSA group and 7 (30%) in the TSA group. No difference was found between the 2 groups in pregnancy rate in the patients' female partners.
                USTSA is a safe and accurate method for sperm retrieval in azoospermic patients.
                Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. A novel sperm collection method by epididymal micropuncture combined with perivascular nerve stimulation has been developed to obtain as many clean sperm as possible for IVF for patients with surgically irreparable vasal obstruction. To assess whether the new technique could improve the fertilization and pregnancy rates obtained when attempting microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) to retrieve epididymal sperm from such patients, a prospective randomized comparative study was conducted. Twenty-nine cycles of conventional MESA with ICSI were performed on 25 couples with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) and four failed vasovasostomy cases (group 1). Thirty cycles of epididymal micropuncture with nerve stimulation with ICSI were performed on 28 couples with CBAVD and two failed epididymovasostomy cases (group 2). The mean volume of epididymal fluid and sperm motility in group 2 was significantly higher than that in group 1 (p < .001). Both fertilization and pregnancy rates in group 2 were significantly higher than those in group 1 (p < .001 and p < .03). This novel epididymal sperm collection method for ICSI can provide significantly higher fertilization and pregnancy rates than conventional MESA for ICSI.
There is insufficient evidence to recommend any specific sperm retrieval technique for azoospermic men undergoing ICSI. In the absence of evidence to support more invasive or more technically difficult methods, the review authors recommend the least invasive and simplest technique available. Further randomised trials are warranted, preferably multi-centred trials. The classification of azoospermia as obstructive and non-obstructive appears to be relevant to a successful clinical outcome and a distinction according to the cause of azoospermia is important for future clinical trials.