Combined orbital irradiation and systemic steroids compared with systemic steroids alone in the management of moderate-to-severe Graves' ophthalmopathy: a preliminary study. A randomized controlled trial of orbital radiotherapy versus sham irradiation in patients with mild Graves' ophthalmopathy. Radiotherapy for Graves' orbitopathy: randomised placebo-controlled study. Orbital cobalt irradiation combined with systemic corticosteroids for Graves' ophthalmopathy: comparison with systemic corticosteroids alone. Sham radiation in clinical trials assessing radiotherapy for exudative age-related macular degeneration.
To assess the efficacy and safety of combined orbital irradiation and systemic steroids in the management of moderate-to-severe Graves' ophthalmopathy.
                Single-blind randomised prospective study.
                Regional hospital, Hong Kong.
                Sixteen patients with active moderate-to-severe Graves' ophthalmopathy who were randomly assigned to steroid therapy (ST group) or combination therapy of orbital irradiation and systemic steroids (SRT group) between June 2000 and June 2003.
                NOSPECS scoring system, total eye score, subjective eye score, and extra-ocular muscle thickness as determined by either computed tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging scans.
                The study was completed by 15 of 16 patients. Both groups experienced improvement in total eye score, soft tissue swelling, ocular motility, visual acuity, and subjective eye score at 52-week follow-up. Total eye score improved earlier in the SRT group, achieving statistical significance (P<0.05) at as early as 4 weeks of follow-up. Improvement in ocular parameters was greater and led to a significantly greater reduction in total eye score than in the ST group at weeks 16, 24, and 52. Maximum extra-ocular muscle thickness was significantly reduced in the SRT group only. No change was observed in proptosis in either group. No serious adverse effect was observed with the addition of orbital irradiation to steroid therapy.
                A combination of orbital irradiation and systemic steroids is well tolerated and more effective than steroids alone in the treatment of active moderate-to-severe Graves' ophthalmopathy. It achieves greater and more rapid improvement in soft tissue swelling, ocular motility, and visual acuity. Radiotherapy is often used in Graves' ophthalmopathy, but its efficacy has been doubted. We compared its efficacy with sham irradiation in mild ophthalmopathy. In a double-blind randomized trial, 44 patients received orbital irradiation, and 44 were sham-irradiated. The primary outcome was assessed using major and minor criteria. As secondary outcome, we used a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (the GO-QoL) and compared cost-effectiveness and need for follow-up treatment. The primary outcome was successful in 23 of 44 (52%) irradiated patients vs. 12 of 44 (27%) sham-irradiated patients at 12 months after treatment (relative risk, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.4; P = 0.02). Radiotherapy was effective in improving eye muscle motility and decreasing the severity of diplopia. However, quality of life improved similarly in both groups. In the radiotherapy group there was less need for follow-up treatment; 66% vs. 84% of the patients needed further treatment (P = 0.049). Retrobulbar irradiation did not prevent worsening of ophthalmopathy, which occurred in 14% of the irradiated and 16% of the sham-irradiated patients. Radiotherapy is an effective treatment in mild ophthalmopathy. However, the improvement upon irradiation may not be associated with an increase in quality of life or a reduction in treatment costs. The best treatment (steroids, irradiation, or both) for moderately severe Graves' orbitopathy, a self-limiting disease is not known. We tested the efficacy of external beam irradiation compared with sham-irradiation.
                In a double-blind randomised clinical trial, 30 patients with moderately severe Graves' orbitopathy had radiotherapy (20 Gy in ten fractions), and 30 were assigned sham-irradiation (ten fractions of 0 Gy). Treatment outcome was measured qualitatively by changes in major and minor criteria and quantitatively in several ophthalmic and other variables, such as eyelid aperture, proptosis, eye movements, subjective eye score, and clinical-activity score at 24 weeks.
                The qualitative treatment outcome was successful in 18 of 30 (60%) irradiated patients versus nine of 29 (31%) sham-irradiated patients at week 24 (relative risk [RR]=1.9 [95% CI 1.0-3.6], p=0.04). This difference was caused by improvements in diplopia grade, but not by reduction of proptosis, nor of eyelid swelling. Quantitatively, elevation improved significantly in the radiotherapy group, whereas all other variables remained unchanged. The field of binocular single vision was enlarged in 11 of 17 patients after irradiation compared with two of 15 after sham-irradiation. Nevertheless, only 25% of the irradiated patients were spared from additional strabismus surgery.
                In these patients with moderately severe Graves' orbitopathy, radiotherapy should be used only to treat motility impairment. The effects of different methods of treatment of Graves' ophthalmopathy were evaluated in a series of 48 patients. Thirty-six patients were given combined treatment with orbital cobalt irradiation and systemic 6 alpha-methylprednisolone (methylprednisolone). Included in this group were 12 of 24 consecutive patients who were randomly assigned to either combined therapy or systemic methylprednisolone alone. The degree of ocular involvement and responses to treatment were evaluated by numerical scoring (ophthalmopathy index) and clinical assessment. Of the 36 patients treated by combined therapy, 12 (33%) showed excellent responses, 14 (39%) showed good responses, 9 (25%) showed slight responses, and 1 (3%) had no response. Treatment was more effective for soft tissue involvement, newly developed ophthalmoplegia, and optic neuropathy, while proptosis and longstanding ophthalmoplegia were less responsive. There was an inverse relationship between the duration of ophthalmopathy and the efficacy of treatment, more favorable results being observed when symptoms had been present for less than 2 yr. Treatment with systemic methylprednisolone alone was also effective, but, in general, responses were less satisfactory; 4 of the 12 patients of this group (33%) had good responses, 6 (50%) had slight responses, and 2 (17%) had no response. The results obtained in the 24 patients randomly assigned to combined therapy or steroid treatment alone were compared by evaluating changes in the ophthalmopathy index. Mean initial ophthalmopathy indices (6.4 vs. 6.2, respectively) showed no significant differences between the 2 groups, whereas the mean decrease in the group receiving combined therapy (4.8) was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) than that in the other group (3.2). In conclusion, the present study indicates that both orbital cobalt irradiation combined with systemic methylprednisolone treatment and systemic methylprednisolone therapy alone are valuable methods of treatment for Graves' ophthalmopathy, but the combined therapy proved to be more effective. To evaluate the effectiveness of sham radiation treatments in masking patients to their randomization group in the Radiation of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (ROARMD) Study.
                Patients with choroidal neovascularization complicating age-related macular degeneration were randomized to a treatment (RAD) group that received external beam irradiation (seven treatment sessions) or to a control (SHAM) group that received sham radiation (one sham treatment session). During a telephone survey, 62 of 73 randomized patients responded to the following questions: Do you think you received radiation? Why do you feel that way? Did the vision in your study eye worsen after enrollment?
                Eighty-one percent of the RAD group and 59% of the SHAM group thought that they had received radiation. In patients who thought that their vision had stabilized or improved, 82% thought that they had received radiation. In patients who thought that their vision was worse, only 39% thought that they had received radiation. In 54% of patients, subjective perception of vision influenced their guess as to whether they received radiation.
                Subjective patient perception of visual outcome was the most influential variable for masking. Variation between radiation treatment and sham session techniques, such as equipment used and duration of treatments, played a lesser role in the masking of patients. Seven treatment days correlated with a higher number of patients who thought that they had received radiation. Although our procedures do not strictly mask the two groups, one sham radiation session was effective in keeping patients guessing their randomization group.
This review found that orbital radiotherapy is more effective than sham radiotherapy for the treatment of mild-to-moderate thyroid eye disease. In a single trial no difference between radiotherapy and steroid monotherapy was found. A meta-analysis of our secondary outcome of disease severity was not possible but results from individual trials suggest a better outcome with combination treatment with steroids versus steroids alone. No significant changes in quality-of-life scores following treatment with radiotherapy versus alternative treatments were found. Short-term adverse events related to radiotherapy that were reported were local and mild but long-term data were lacking and development of retinal changes following radiotherapy was not reported on.