Redisplaced unstable fractures of the distal radius: a prospective randomised comparison of four methods of treatment. The role of physiotherapy and clinical predictors of outcome after fracture of the distal radius. A randomised clinical trial of activity-focussed physiotherapy on patients with distal radius fractures. Occupational therapy and Colles' fractures. The effect of passive mobilisation following fractures involving the distal radius: a randomised study. Unstable extra-articular fractures of the distal radius: a prospective, randomised study of immobilisation in a cast versus supplementary percutaneous pinning. A randomized, controlled trial of distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement but without joint incongruity: closed reduction and casting versus closed reduction, spanning external fixation, and optional percutaneous K-wires. Redisplaced unstable fractures of the distal radius. A randomised, prospective study of bridging versus non-bridging external fixation. A prospective randomized trial of external fixation and plaster cast immobilization in the treatment of distal radial fractures. Cast or external fixation for fracture of the distal radius. A prospective study of 126 cases.
We performed a prospective, randomised trial on 120 patients with redisplaced fractures of the distal radius comparing four methods of treatment. The four treatment groups, each containing 30 patients, were remanipulation and plaster, open reduction and bone grafting, and closed external fixation with and without mobilisation of the wrist at three weeks. The radiological results showed improvement in angulation of the distal radius for the open reduction and bone grafting group. Functional results at six weeks, three and six months and at one year, however, showed no difference between any of the four groups. The main influence on final outcome was carpal malalignment which had a statistically significant negative effect on function. The capacity for physiotherapy to improve the outcome after fracture of the distal radius is unproven. We carried out a randomised controlled trial on 96 patients, comparing conventional physiotherapy with a regime of home exercises. The function of the upper limb was assessed at the time of removal of the plaster cast and at three and six months after injury. Factors which may predict poor outcome in these patients were sought. Grip strength and hand function did not significantly differ between the two groups. Flexion and extension of the wrist were the only movements to improve with physiotherapy at six months (p = 0.001). Predictors of poor functional outcome were malunion and impaired function before the fracture. These patients presented with pain, decreased rotation of the forearm and low functional scores at six weeks. Our study has shown that home exercises are adequate rehabilitation after uncomplicated fracture of the distal radius, and routine referral for a course of physiotherapy should be discouraged. The role of physiotherapy in patients at high risk of a poor outcome requires further investigation. Physiotherapy is considered by some authorities to be an important aspect of management in patients following distal radius fractures. There is evidence of improvement in impairment with physiotherapy; however, there is no evidence to support early return of functional activity. Traditional physiotherapy management has focussed on improving impairment; however, there are no trials with emphasis on skill acquisition via motor re-learning principles.
                Forty-one participants with conservatively managed distal radius fractures were studied in a randomised, single-blinded, prospective trial. Two treatment options were compared: exercise and advice versus activity-focussed physiotherapy with measurement periods of 6 weeks after removal of cast and follow-up at 24 weeks.
                Participants allocated to the exercise and advice group consulted a physiotherapist an average of 0.9 (SD 0.4) times, while the participants allocated to the more intensive activity-focussed group consulted with physiotherapy a mean of 4.4 (SD 2.3) times. At both 6 and 24 weeks there were no significant differences between the groups for change in impairment (as measured by grip strength, range of motion of wrist flexion and extension and pain intensity), activity limitation and participation restriction, as measured by the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). Exercise and advice given by a physiotherapist were equally as effective as activity-focussed physiotherapy in recovery both at 6 and 24 weeks.
                The results suggest that after removal of cast from fracture of distal radius, patients may routinely require no more than a single session of advice and exercise provided by a physiotherapist. In this randomized trial, we enrolled 30 patients treated for a distal radius Colles' type fracture. The fractures were reduced if necessary and fixed in a below-elbow plaster cast for 5 weeks. One group consisting of 14 patients received instructions for shoulder; elbow and finger exercise and the other group consisting of 16 patients had occupational therapy. At 5 weeks, 3 and 9 months we measured the functional scores. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at any time. It seems that for non-surgically treated patients with a distal radius fracture only instructions are necessary. This study investigated whether passive mobilisation added to the effectiveness of an advice and exercise regimen for patients following distal radial fractures. Thirty-nine patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Patients in the first group received advice and exercises; patients in the second group also received a six-week course of passive mobilisation. Range of movement, function and pain were measured pre-treatment, and three and six weeks later. Significant improvements were found over time for all outcome measures. No significant differences were detected between groups for any outcomes except flexion, where the difference was not clinically important. Routine passive mobilisation does not appear to incur additional benefit over an advice and exercise regimen for this patient group. We performed a prospective, randomised study on 57 patients older than 60 years of age with unstable, extra-articular fractures of the distal radius to compare the outcome of immobilisation in a cast alone with that using supplementary, percutaneous pinning. Patients treated by percutaneous wires had a statistically significant improvement in dorsal angulation (mean 7 degrees), radial length (mean 3 mm) and radial inclination (mean 3 mm) at one year. However, there was no significant difference in functional outcome in terms of pain, range of movement, grip strength, activities of daily living and the SF-36 score except for an improved range of movement in ulnar deviation in the percutaneous wire group. One patient developed a pin-track infection which required removal of the wires at two weeks. We conclude that percutaneous pinning of unstable, extra-articular fractures of the distal radius provides only a marginal improvement in the radiological parameters compared with immobilisation in a cast alone. This does not correlate with an improved functional outcome in a low-demand, elderly population. To compare closed reduction and casting with closed reduction and external fixation with optional K-wire fixation for distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement but without joint incongruity.
                Prospective study.
                Multicenter study at 3 University teaching hospitals.
                A total of 113 skeletally mature patients with distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement, but without joint incongruity, were randomized to receive 1 of 2 standardized treatment protocols. Patients were evaluated at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.
                Closed reduction and casting (n = 59) or closed reduction and external fixation (n = 54).
                Upper extremity function was measured using upper extremity MFA domain scores, overall Jebsen Taylor scores, and pinch and grip strength tests. Global function and pain were measured using the SF-36. Radiographic evaluation and range of motion were documented.
                Upper extremity MFA scores, Jebsen Taylor scores, SF-36 bodily pain scores, and grip strength improved significantly during the first year for all patients. By 2 years, mean Jebsen Taylor scores and SF 36 bodily pain scores for patients in both groups were similar to scores for normal age- and gender-matched population controls. At all points, there was a trend for better function in the external fixation; however, this did not reach statistical significance. There was a trend for better length and palmar tilt restoration with external fixation.
                For distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement but with a congruous joint, there exists a trend for better functional, clinical, and radiographic outcomes when treated by immediate external fixation and optional K-wire fixation. A randomised, prospective study was carried out on 60 patients with unstable fractures of the distal radius to compare bridging with non-bridging external fixation using pins placed in the distal fragment of the radius. The radiological results showed significant improvement in the non-bridging group at all stages of review. In particular, normal volar tilt and carpal alignment were regained and maintained. The functional results at six weeks, three months, six months and one year showed statistically better grip strength and flexion in the non-bridging group at all stages of review. Other ranges of movement showed an early advantage in the non-bridging group. Non-bridging external fixation is the treatment of choice for unstable fractures of the distal radius which have sufficient space for the placement of pins in the distal fragment. Distal radial fractures are common, and many methods of treatment have been reported but there are no studies that compare the different treatment methods. This randomized prospective study demonstrated no advantage in using an external fixator to immobilize reduced distal radial fractures over closed reduction and plaster cast immobilization in patients less than 60 years of age. The external fixator group had a significant complication rate. In a prospective 4-year study, 126 consecutive patients with a fracture of the distal radius were followed. Functional, anatomic, and radiographic final results of fixation with above-the-elbow cast immobilization were compared with the results obtained with external fixation. The results following external fixation of comminuted intraarticular fractures were better than those of similar fractures treated in a cast. Aged osteoporotic patients tolerated better residual deformities, and the clinical results had a relatively low correlation with the final anatomic alignment. We suggest that extraarticular fractures of the distal radius should be treated with cast immobilization. Comminuted intraarticular fractures of the distal radius should be treated with external fixation, which maintains accurate anatomic position until solid fracture healing is achieved.
The available evidence from randomised controlled trials is insufficient to establish the relative effectiveness of the various interventions used in the rehabilitation of adults with fractures of the distal radius.