Low dose heparin and compression stockings in the prevention of postoperative deep venous thrombosis. Prevention of postoperative deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli with combined modalities. The efficacy of graduated compression stockings in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis after major gynaecological surgery.
The frequency of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was studied in 98 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. All the patients received low dose heparin prophylaxis 5000 i.u. every 12 h for 5-7 days. In each patient, a graduated compression stocking was also worn and randomly allocated to one of the legs and the other leg served as a control. DVT was diagnosed by the 125I-fibrinogen method. Four patients developed bilateral DVT and 8 patients unilateral DVT, all of whom developed it in the control leg. The difference in unilateral DVT between stockinged and control legs was significant (P < 0.004). It is concluded that a combination of low dose heparin and graduated compression stockings is more effective than low dose heparin alone in reducing the frequency of postoperative DVT. It is suggested that this combination of prophylaxis might be of value in high risk patients. Worldwide statistics reveal that 25 to 40 per cent of patients who are over the age of 40 years and operated on for 1 or more hours will develop a deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The studies reviewed in this paper were performed to evaluate several modalities and compare their effectiveness in preventing DVT in postoperative patients. In the first study, five modalities plus a control group were evaluated in 562 patients from five surgical specialties. The incidence of DVT in the control group was 35 per cent. Though most of the pharmacologic agents were effective in reducing the incidence of DVT, the antistasis devices (gradient elastic stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression) were most effective. The purpose of the second study was to evaluate the effectiveness of combining a pharmacologic drug with an antistasis modality. Deep venous thrombosis was virtually eliminated in this group of 328 patients. There was only a 1.5 per cent incidence of DVT in the treated population as compared to a 26.8 per cent incidence in the control group. Thus, it seems that combining one antistasis and one pharmacologic agent greatly reduces the incidence of lower extremity thrombi. I-125 fibrinogen scanning was the most sensitive test in detecting DVT and had an accuracy of 97 per cent. The efficacy of graduated compression stockings in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after major gynaecological surgery was investigated in a controlled randomized prospective trial in 196 patients who were greater than 35 years of age. The stockings were worn by 104 of the 196 patients throughout their stay in hospital, the other 92 patients did not wear the stockings (control group). All the patients were scanned for DVT postoperatively with the 125I-labelled fibrinogen test. None of the 104 patients who wore the stockings developed a thromboembolism, but four of the 92 control patients who did not wear the stockings had DVT. This difference between the two groups was statistically significant.
This review found that there is insufficient high quality evidence to determine whether or not KL and TL GCS differ in their effectiveness in terms of reducing the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in hospitalised patients.  A major multicentre RCT is required to address this issue. In the meantime, the decision on which type of stocking to use in clinical practice is likely to be influenced by factors such as patient compliance, ease of use and cost implications.