Implementation of an evidence-based guideline to reduce duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy and length of stay for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial. Communication training and antibiotic use in acute respiratory tract infections. A cluster randomised controlled trial in general practice. A randomized, prospective study measuring outcomes after antibiotic therapy intervention by a multidisciplinary consult team. Comparison of two prophylactic single-dose intravenous antibiotic regimes in the treatment of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in a district general hospital.
Patients with pneumonia often remain hospitalized after they are stable clinically, and the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy is a rate-limiting step for discharge. The purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of an evidence-based guideline would reduce the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy and length of stay for patients hospitalized with pneumonia.
                In a seven-site, cluster randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 325 control and 283 intervention patients who were admitted by one of 116 physician groups. Within site, physician groups were assigned randomly to receive a practice guideline alone (control arm) or a practice guideline that was implemented using a multifaceted strategy (intervention arm). The effectiveness of guideline implementation was measured by the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy and length of stay; differences in the rates of discontinuation and hospital discharge were assessed with proportional hazards models. Medical outcomes were assessed at 30 days.
                Intravenous antibiotic therapy was discontinued somewhat more quickly in the intervention group (hazard ratio [HR] =1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 1.52; P = 0.06) than in the control group. Intervention patients were discharged more quickly, but the difference was not statistically significant (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.38; P = 0.11). Fewer intervention (55% [157/283]) than control (63% [206/325]) patients had medical complications during the index hospitalization (P = 0.04), with no differences in other medical outcomes, including mortality, rehospitalization, and return to usual activities, between treatment arms.
                The multifaceted guideline implementation strategy resulted in a slight reduction in the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy and a nonsignificant reduction in length of stay, without affecting patient outcomes. A cluster-randomised controlled trial in general practice
                Physician-patient communication plays a key role in treatment decisions in primary care. We aimed to reduce the antibiotic prescription rate for acute respiratory tract infections using a short training programme in patient-centred communication.
                We conducted a cluster-randomised controlled trial in 45 general practices in Switzerland. Thirty physicians received evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute respiratory tract infections; 15 physicians randomised to the full intervention additionally received training in patient-centred communication. A further 15 physicians, not randomised, served as a control to blind the physicians in the other two groups to the true comparison. The primary outcome was the antibiotic prescription rate reported by pharmacists. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction and enablement, re-consultation rates, days with restrictions, and days off work. 1108 adults with acute respiratory infections were screened between January and May 2004. Outcomes were measured in 837 consultations; 624 patients had follow-up interviews at 7 and 14 days.
                The antibiotic prescription rate reported by pharmacists was low in both full and limited intervention groups (13.5% and 15.7% respectively) but only half of the antibiotics were prescribed according to guidelines (53.8% and 53.1%). No significant differences were seen between the two randomised groups in primary and secondary outcomes. In both groups patient satisfaction was high (median score for both 68 out of 70).
                In this trial, patient-centred communication training did not reduce the rate of antibiotic prescriptions below an already unusually low level. Even with this low prescription rate, patient satisfaction with received care was high. Our aim was to identify financial and outcome benefits of therapeutic intervention by a multidisciplinary antimicrobial treatment team composed of pharmacists, a clinical microbiologist, and an infectious disease specialist. Of 252 consecutive inpatients receiving suboptimal intravenous antibiotics identified by the clinical pharmacist, 127 were prospectively randomized to intervention and 125 to a control group. The groups were similar with regard to severity of illness, infection type, and time from admission to randomization. Physicians received timely, detailed reviews of relevant microbiologic and clinical data with recommendations of possible optimal antibiotic choices, dosages, and rationales. Median length of stay after randomization for control and intervention groups was 9.0 days and 5.7 days, respectively (3.3-day difference, p=0.0001). Fifteen (12.0%) and eight patients (6.3%), respectively, died, although the time-specific mortality risk was not significantly different when length of postrandomization follow-up and time to death were taken into account. Physician acceptance of suggestions was 89%. Median patient charges for radiology, laboratory, pharmacy, and room were reduced by $4404/intervention, and median hospital costs were reduced by $2642/intervention. A multidisciplinary antimicrobial therapy team can be a useful information source for physicians, improve outcomes in hospitalized patients receiving intravenous antimicrobials, and result in substantial cost savings. Two hundred and twenty-nine patients were entered into a study to compare the effectiveness and safety of two single-shot antibiotic regimes in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in two district general hospitals. A single shot of intravenous (IV) latamoxef disodium was as effective as an IV combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole in control of wound infection following elective large bowel surgery when given as a bolus at the time of anaesthetic induction. The incidence of major wound infection was 6% and was evenly distributed in the two treatment groups. Half the major wound infections were associated with faecal fistulae. A single shot of IV antibiotic at the time of anaesthetic induction was safe, simple and an effective prophylaxis against major wound infection. There was a low incidence (1.3%) of serious postoperative bleeding and no serious adverse reactions were noted. The overall mortality was 9%. Death was significantly related to elderly patients, a poor performance status, operative contamination and wound infections.
In this meta-analysis, preventive antibiotic therapy seemed to reduce the risk of infection, but did not reduce the number of dependent or deceased patients. However, the included studies were small and heterogeneous. Large randomised trials are urgently needed.