A randomized, controlled trial of clomiphene citrate and intrauterine insemination in couples with unexplained infertility or surgically corrected endometriosis. Evaluation of clomiphene citrate and human chorionic gonadotropin treatment: a prospective, randomized, crossover study during intrauterine insemination cycles. Unexplained infertility: evaluation of treatment with clomiphene citrate and human chorionic gonadotropin. Questioning the efficacy of Fallopian tube sperm perfusion.
This study was initiated to test the hypothesis that treatment with clomiphene citrate (CC) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) results in increased fecundity when compared with periovulatory intercourse in couples with either unexplained infertility or surgically corrected endometriosis. Sixty-seven couples entered a randomized, prospective trial comparing CC/IUI with observation. During the study, there were 14 pregnancies in 148 treated cycles (fecundity = 0.095) compared with 5 pregnancies in 150 untreated cycles (fecundity = 0.033). Using life-table analysis and the log-rank test, the difference in fecundities was statistically significant. Pregnancy outcome was not significantly different between the two groups. When comparing conception with nonconception cycles during treatment, no differences between the size of the lead follicle or the number of dominant follicles was detected. We conclude that treatment with CC/IUI improves fecundity in couples with unexplained infertility or surgically corrected endometriosis. To test the hypothesis that in couples undergoing IUI, actively managed cycles using clomiphene citrate (CC) stimulation, ultrasound monitoring, and hCG timing will result in increased pregnancy rate (PR) per cycle compared with unstimulated urinary LH-timed cycles.
                Fifty-six couples with unexplained infertility (n = 26) or male factor infertility (n = 30) participated in the study.
                Tertiary academic medical center.
                Prospective, randomized, crossover. Couples were randomized initially to one of the two study groups (treatment A: LH-timed IUI; treatment B: CC-stimulated, hCG-timed IUI). If no pregnancy occurred, each couple alternated between the two regimens during subsequent cycles, up to a total of four cycles.
                Twenty-nine couples completed the study and the analysis of 95 cycles revealed that among the male factor infertility group, one pregnancy occurred during the 26 cycles of each treatment group (PR per cycle of 3.9% for both treatment groups). In contrast, among the unexplained infertility group, there was a marked difference in the effect of treatments. During treatment A only one pregnancy occurred in 20 cycles (PR of 5% per cycle) whereas during treatment B, six pregnancies occurred in 23 cycles (PR of 26.1% per cycle).
                If IUI is chosen as the treatment modality in unexplained infertility, the addition of active ovulation management that includes CC stimulation, ultrasound monitoring of folliculogenesis, and hCG timing of ovulation increases the PR per cycle. In couples with male infertility, PR per cycle is low and is apparently not affected by the addition of active ovulation management. A double-blind, randomized, prospective therapeutic trial was conducted in 148 couples with unexplained infertility. Treatment consisted of 4 consecutive months of placebo or clomiphene citrate (CC) (100 mg) by mouth on cycle days 5 to 9, and placebo or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (5,000 IU) intramuscularly on cycle days 19, 22, 25, and 28. There were 14 pregnancies during the trial and 39 pregnancies during observation before and after the trial. Placebo treatment resulted in no pregnancies over 4 months. Clomiphene citrate was significantly better than placebo (P less than 0.04), with a pregnancy rate of 19% over the course of 4 months. The pregnancy rate with hCG either alone (11%) or in combination with CC (7.6%), was not significantly better than placebo. Treatment-independent pregnancies, defined as those before treatment (but after enrollment), or more than 1 month after therapy, occurred in 16% of the couples, with a mean time to conception of 8.8 months. As part of their follow-up, 39 of the study couples subsequently underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF), and 43% were found to have a previously unrecognized male factor or fertilization defect. A pregnancy rate of 16% was achieved after a mean of 1.1 cycles in these 39 couples. The authors conclude that CC is useful in treating unexplained infertility and is a reasonable initial therapy. For couples who fail to conceive, IVF may be diagnostic as well as therapeutic. The aim of this work was to compare the efficiency of standard intrauterine insemination (IUI) and Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) in the treatment of infertility. Ninety-six consecutive patients with infertility in 100 cycles were included in the study. Those randomized to standard IUI included 48 patients in 50 cycles [25 clomiphene citrate only and 25 clomiphene citrate/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) cycles] (group I). Patients subjected to FSP included 48 patients in 50 cycles (18 clomiphene citrate only and 32 clomiphene citrate/HMG cycles) (group II). The overall pregnancy rate per cycle (16% versus 18%) was not significantly different in the two groups. The pregnancy rates were also similar in the two groups when compared for the cause of infertility: ovulatory disorder 16.7% versus 16%, tubal impairment 10% versus 9.1%, cervical hostility (no pregnancy occurred in this group) and unexplained infertility 21.4 % versus 25 %. The overall pregnancy rate (for the two groups) appeared higher when clomiphene citrate/HMG was used for ovulation induction (21.1%) than when clomiphene citrate only was used (11.6%).
IVF may be more effective than IUI+SO. Due to paucity of data from RCTs the effectiveness of IVF for unexplained infertility relative to expectant management, clomiphene citrate and IUI alone remains unproven. Adverse events and the costs associated with these interventions have not been adequately assessed.