Safety and efficacy of fluvastatin in hyperlipidemic patients with chronic renal disease. Impact of treatment of dyslipidemia on renal function, fat deposits and scarring in patients with persistent nephrotic syndrome. Long-term fluvastatin reduces the hazardous effect of renal impairment on four-year atherosclerotic outcomes (a LIPS substudy). Effect of pravastatin on proteinuria in patients with well-controlled hypertension. A controlled, prospective study of the effects of atorvastatin on proteinuria and progression of kidney disease. Interim evidence of the renoprotective effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan versus the calcium channel blocker amlodipine in patients with chronic kidney disease and hypertension: a report of the Japanese Losartan Therapy Intended for Global Renal Protection in Hypertensive Patients (JLIGHT) Study. Effect of fluvastatin on proteinuria in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Effect of rosuvastatin on C-reactive protein and renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease. Effect of fluvastatin on cardiac outcomes in renal transplant recipients: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Cholesterol-lowering therapy may retard the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Atorvastatin and the dyslipidemia of early renal failure. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. A prospective clinical trial comparing the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy and nephrotic syndrome with simvastatin and diet, versus diet alone. Low-dose atorvastatin in severe chronic kidney disease patients: a randomized, controlled endpoint study. Effect of fluvastatin on acute renal allograft rejection: a randomized multicenter trial. Effect of pravastatin on cardiovascular events in people with chronic kidney disease. Effect of rosuvastatin pretreatment on myocardial damage after coronary surgery: a randomized trial. Effects of statin treatment on uric acid homeostasis in patients with primary hyperlipidemia. Efficacy and drug interactions of the new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors cerivastatin and atorvastatin in CsA-treated renal transplant recipients. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. Efficacy and safety of statins in hypercholesterolemia with emphasis on lipoproteins. Similar effects of atorvastatin, simvastatin and pravastatin on thrombogenic and inflammatory parameters in patients with hypercholesterolemia. The efficacy and safety of short- and long-term dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with mild or moderate chronic kidney disease: results from the Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial. Add-on and withdrawal effect of pravastatin on proteinuria in hypertensive patients treated with AT receptor blockers. Effect of cerivastatin on proteinuria and urinary podocytes in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis. hsCRP and HDL effects of statins trial (CHEST): rapid effect of statin therapy on C-reactive protein and high-density lipoprotein levels A clinical investigation.
There are few reports on the safety and efficacy of long-term treatment with statins in patients with chronic renal disease and hyperlipidemia. We evaluated these subjects treated with fluvastatin.
                After a 4-week run-in period, a total of 80 patients with diabetic nephropathy or chronic glomerulonephritis were randomly allocated to receive dietary therapy and fluvastatin 20 mg/day (n=39), or dietary therapy alone (n=41) for a period of 48 weeks. Lipid parameters, rhabdomyolysis-related indicators, 24-hour urinary albumin excretion and creatinine clearance were measured. The pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin was examined in 8 patients.
                Creatinine clearance and 24-hour urinary albumin excretion did not differ between the two groups. The peak serum fluvastatin concentration (Cmax) was 141+/-67 microg/L and the mean AUC0-6 h was 341+/-149 microgh/L. Fluvastatin treatment significantly lowered serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and apo-lipoprotein B concentrations by 16%, 25%, and 22%, respectively, compared with patients receiving dietary therapy alone. There were no significant differences in serum triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations between the two treatment groups. Serum creatine kinase and aldolase concentrations did not change throughout treatment in both groups.
                Fluvastatin treatment significantly improved lipid parameters in patients with chronic renal disease. Fluvastatin was well tolerated, with no adverse effects on renal function and no muscular toxicity. However, the drug showed no direct renoprotective effects. In this study 43 patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome were randomly distributed into 2 age- and sex-matched groups. The first group was given fluvastatin while the second was used as control. The cases in the 2 groups were evaluated clinically, biochemically (creatinine clearance, albumin, 24-hour proteinuria, and lipogram), neurologically, and histopathologically (examination of renal biopsies obtained basally and after 1 year of treatment with fluvastatin). In the fluvastatin-treated group but not in the control group, we observed a significant reduction in cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride. Clinical and laboratory assessment showed satisfactory tolerance of the drug by the patients. Proteinuria, serum albumin and creatinine clearance values were significantly better in the statin-treated patients. There was no difference in glomerular sclerosis between the 2 groups while interstitial fibrosis and renal fat deposits were less in the statin-treated group. The reduction in renal fat deposits in the statin-treated group was highly significant, while that of interstitial fibrosis was not. We conclude that: (1) statin can be safely and effectively used in the treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with persistent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome; (2) control of dyslipidemia in nephrotic patients is associated with better control of proteinuria and creatinine clearance; (3) statin treatment may cause regression of renal fat deposits in patients with nephrotic syndrome, and (4) longer term studies are still required to study further possible beneficial effects on renal histology and disease progression.
                Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel Mild renal impairment is an important risk factor for late cardiovascular complications. This substudy of the Lescol Intervention Prevention Study (LIPS) assessed the effect of fluvastatin on outcome of patients who had renal dysfunction and those who did not. Complete data for creatinine clearance calculation (Cockcroft-Gault formula) were available for 1,558 patients (92.9% of the LIPS population). Patients were randomized to fluvastatin or placebo after successful completion of a first percutaneous coronary intervention. Follow-up time was 3 to 4 years. The effect of baseline creatinine clearance on coronary atherosclerotic events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and coronary reinterventions not related to restenosis) was evaluated. Baseline creatinine clearance (logarithmic transformation) was inversely associated with an incidence of adverse events among patients who received placebo (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.982 to 0.998, p = 0.01). However, no association was noted between creatinine clearance and the incidence of adverse events among patients who received fluvastatin (hazard ratio 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.0, p = 0.63). No further deterioration in creatinine clearance was observed during follow-up, regardless of baseline renal function or allocated treatment. Occurrence of adverse events was not related to changes in renal function during follow-up. Fluvastatin therapy markedly decreased the risk of coronary atherosclerotic events after percutaneous intervention in patients who had lower values of creatinine clearance at baseline. The benefit of fluvastatin was unrelated to any effect on renal function. Proteinuria is an important risk factor for cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality. The effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy on proteinuria in normolipidemic patients with well-controlled hypertension have not been studied. A total of 63 normolipidemic (total cholesterol <240 mg/dL) and proteinuric (300 to 3000 mg/d) patients with well-controlled blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg) were randomized to receive either placebo (n=32) or pravastatin (10 mg/d; n=31) after a 3-month placebo period. Pravastatin lowered proteinuria after 6 months by 54% (P<0.0001). Creatinine clearance was stable throughout the study in the 2 groups. Despite unchanged plasma endothelin-1 levels throughout the study, urinary excretion of the peptide was decreased and significantly correlated with improvement in urinary protein excretion in pravastatin-treated patients (r=0.64, P=0.001). The urinary excretion of retinol-binding protein decreased after pravastatin administration, probably reflecting an improvement in tubular function. In contrast, the urinary excretion of IgG did not change significantly throughout the study in either group. Multivariate analysis revealed that proteinuria was only significantly correlated with statin use (P<0.0001, R2= 0.66). Linear regression analysis in the statin-treated group did not show any correlation between changes in lipid profiles and proteinuria regression. Thus, in addition to their primary function of antilipidemia, the addition of pravastatin to treatment for well-controlled hypertension may have an additive effect on reducing proteinuria independent of hemodynamics and lipid-lowering effects, possibly through inhibiting renal endothelin-1 synthesis and improving tubular function. Chronic kidney diseases, particularly if presenting with significant proteinuria, are commonly associated with substantial alteration of serum lipid levels. Experimental evidence suggests that lipid abnormalities may contribute to the progression of kidney disease. However, studies in humans on the subject are scarce.
                In a prospective, controlled open-label study, the authors have evaluated the effects of one-year treatment with atorvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, versus no treatment on proteinuria and progression of kidney disease in 56 patients with chronic kidney disease. Before randomization, all patients had already been treated for one year with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists (ARBs) and other antihypertensive drugs.
                By the end of one-year treatment, urine protein excretion decreased from 2.2 +/- 0.1 to 1.2 +/- 1.0 g every 24 hours (P < 0.01) in patients treated with atorvastatin in addition to ACE inhibitor and ARBs. By contrast, urinary protein excretion decreased only from 2.0 +/- 0.1 to 1.8 +/- 0.1 g every 24 hours (P value not significant) in patients who did not receive atorvastatin in addition to ACE inhibitor or ARBs. During this time, creatinine clearance decreased only slightly and not significantly (from 51 +/- 1.8 to 49.8 +/- 1.7) in patients treated with atorvastatin. By contrast, during the same period of observation, creatinine clearance decreased from 50 +/- 1.9 to 44.2 +/- 1.6 mL/min (P < 0.01) in patients who did not receive atorvastatin.
                This study has shown that treatment with atorvastatin in addition to a regimen with ACE inhibitors or ARBs may reduce proteinuria and the rate of progression of kidney disease in patients with chronic kidney disease, proteinuria, and hypercholesterolemia. The benefits appear to occur in addition to those of treatment with ACE inhibitor and ARBs.
                Copyright 2003 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Insufficiency of renal function and high blood pressure influence each other and eventually result in life-threatening endstage renal disease. It has been proposed that proteinuria per se is a determinant of the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The therapeutic strategy for patients with proteinuric CKD and hypertension should therefore be targeted with a view not merely toward blood pressure reduction but also toward renoprotection.
                We examined the effect of the angiotensin (AT)1 receptor antagonist losartan and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine, throughout a period of 12 months, on reduction of blood pressure and renoprotection. This was done by assessing amounts of urinary protein excretion, serum creatinine (SCr), and creatinine clearance (CCr) in patients with hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > or = 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > or = 90 mmHg) and CKD (male, body weight [BW] > or = 60 kg: 1.5 < or = SCr < 3.0 mg/dl; female or male BW < 60 kg: 1.3 < or = SCr < 3.0 mg/dl), manifesting proteinuria of 0.5 g or more/day. Losartan was administered once daily at doses of 25 to 100 mg/day, and amlodipine was given once daily at 2.5 to 5 mg/day. No antihypertensive combination therapy was allowed during the first 3-month period.
                A 3-month interim analysis revealed that, despite there being no difference in blood pressure between the two groups, there was a significant reduction in 24-h urinary protein excretion in the losartan group ( n = 43), but there was no change in the amlodipine group ( n = 43). Analysis of stratified subgroups with proteinuria of 2 g or more/day and less than 2 g/day showed that losartan lowered proteinuria by approximately 24% in both subgroups, while amlodipine lowered proteinuria by 10%, but only in the subgroup of less than 2 g/day (NS). SCr and CCr did not change throughout the period of 3 months in either group. No severe or fatal adverse event was experienced in either group during the study period.
                Losartan appeared to be efficacious for renoprotection in patients with proteinuric CKD and hypertension, with the mechanism being independent of its antihypertensive action. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors are established drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, but several studies have shown that benefits obtained with these drugs are not causally related only to regression of cholesterol lowering. Moreover, in experimental models of progressive renal disease, statins have reduced the extent of glomerulosclerosis. This study evaluated the antiproteinuric effect of a daily dose of 40 mg fluvastatin for 6 months in moderately proteinuric patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy, stable renal function, and no indicators of poor long-term prognosis. The effects of therapy were evaluated on the basis of 24-hour proteinuria (total proteinuria and albuminuria), albuminemia, creatinine clearance, cholesterol, and triglyceride values. Renal function remained stable in all patients. A significant decrease in proteinuria was observed after 6 months of therapy and persisted for all the observations. An increase in serum albumin was observed after 6 months of therapy. This study suggests that there is an antiproteinuric effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in moderately proteinuric patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy. The purpose of this 20-week, open-label, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of rosuvastatin on fasting serum lipids and lipoproteins, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in 91 patients with chronic kidney disease. Patients were randomized to rosuvastatin 10 mg/day (n = 48) or to no lipid-lowering treatment (n = 43) for 20 weeks. In contrast to patients not receiving rosuvastatin, patients receiving rosuvastatin tended to derive more favorable improvements from baseline values in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-43%, p <0.001, vs 7%, p = NS; p <0.001 for change with rosuvastatin treatment vs change with no antilipemic treatment), hs-CRP (-47%, p <0.001, vs 7%, p = NS; p <0.001 for change with rosuvastatin treatment vs change with no antilipemic treatment), and GFR (11%, p <0.05, vs 4%, p = NS; p = NS for change with rosuvastatin treatment vs change with no antilipemic treatment). Renal transplant recipients are at increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease. Although statins reduce cardiovascular risk in the general population, their efficacy and safety in renal transplant recipients have not been established. We investigated the effects of fluvastatin on cardiac and renal endpoints in this population.
                We did a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 2102 renal transplant recipients with total cholesterol 4.0-9.0 mmol/L. We randomly assigned patients fluvastatin (n=1050) or placebo (n=1052) and follow up was for 5-6 years. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event, defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or coronary intervention procedure. Secondary endpoints were individual cardiac events, combined cardiac death or non-fatal MI, cerebrovascular events, non-cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, and graft loss or doubling of serum creatinine. Analysis was by intention to treat.
                After a mean follow-up of 5.1 years, fluvastatin lowered LDL cholesterol concentrations by 32%. Risk reduction with fluvastatin for the primary endpoint (risk ratio 0.83 [95% CI 0.64-1.06], p=0.139) was not significant, although there were fewer cardiac deaths or non-fatal MI (70 vs 104, 0.65 [0.48-0.88] p=0.005) in the fluvastatin group than in the placebo group. Coronary intervention procedures and other secondary endpoints did not differ significantly between groups.
                Although cardiac deaths and non-fatal MI seemed to be reduced, fluvastatin did not generally reduce rates of coronary intervention procedures or mortality. Overall effects of fluvastatin were similar to those of statins in other populations. There is experimental evidence to suggest that hypercholesterolaemia may play a pathogenetic role in progressive glomerular injury. We investigated the effect of cholesterol-lowering therapy on the progression of diabetic nephropathy in 34 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Patients were randomly assigned in a single-blind fashion to treatment with either lovastatin, an HMG CoA reductase inhibitor (n = 16; mean dose 30.0 +/- 12.6 mg/day) or placebo (n = 18) for 2 years. Renal function was assessed by serially measuring the serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (using Cr51-EDTA), and 24-h urinary protein excretion. Lovastatin treatment was associated with significant reductions in total cholesterol (p < 0.001), LDL-cholesterol (p < 0.001) and apo B (p < 0.01), the reductions at 24 months being 26, 30 and 18%, respectively. Beneficial effects on serum triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol and apo A1 levels were also observed. Lp(a) showed no significant change in both groups. Glomerular filtration rate deteriorated significantly in the placebo group after 24 months (p < 0.025) but showed no significant change in the lovastatin-treated patients. The increase in serum creatinine was statistically significant (p < 0.02) in placebo-treated patients at 12 and 24 months, and in the lovastatin group after 24 months. Twenty-four hour urinary protein excretion increased in both groups (p < 0.05). Lovastatin treatment was not associated with significant elevations in liver or muscle enzymes. We conclude that effective normalisation of hypercholesterolaemia may retard the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Information about lipid abnormalities and the effect of lipid lowering therapy in the early stage of renal disease is limited, while preventive treatment in this stage might be much more beneficial. Lipid profiles and risk factors were assessed in 150 consecutive, non-diabetic patients. Preventive therapy consisted of cholesterol-reduced diet and atorvastatin 10 mg daily. Patients were considered at risk for cardiovascular disease if LDL-cholesterol was >2.6 mmol/l in the case of manifest cardiovascular disease (n=28) or when they had manifest cardiovascular risk factors (n=105) or if LDL was >3.5 mmol/l (n=17). A total of 128 patients (85%) had increased LDL. In men <60 years and women <40 years, total cholesterol was higher than in the general population. Linear regression analysis showed a decreased creatinine clearance to be significantly associated with the lipid profile. For a 10 ml/min decrease of creatinine clearance, a 0.085 increase of the total cholesterol to HDL ratio was observed (P=0.005). In similar analyses, proteinuria was strongly associated with cholesterol and triglycerides. An increase of 0.28 of the total cholesterol/HDL ratio was observed for each gram per 24 h proteinuria (P<0.001). On atorvastatin 10 mg daily, 30 of 60 treated patients had achieved their target LDL value. On average, LDL-cholesterol was reduced by 39% and triglycerides by 18%. No patient had to interrupt their treatment because of adverse side-effects. In conclusion, the majority of patients had an elevated LDL and other lipid abnormalities. Short-term therapy with atorvastatin and a cholesterol lowering diet appears to be safe and effective. It is probably useful to determine the lipid profile in patients with renal failure already in an early phase and to start lipid lowering treatment as soon as abnormalities are found. Increased levels of the inflammatory biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein predict cardiovascular events. Since statins lower levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as well as cholesterol, we hypothesized that people with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels but without hyperlipidemia might benefit from statin treatment.
                We randomly assigned 17,802 apparently healthy men and women with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of less than 130 mg per deciliter (3.4 mmol per liter) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels of 2.0 mg per liter or higher to rosuvastatin, 20 mg daily, or placebo and followed them for the occurrence of the combined primary end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes.
                The trial was stopped after a median follow-up of 1.9 years (maximum, 5.0). Rosuvastatin reduced LDL cholesterol levels by 50% and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels by 37%. The rates of the primary end point were 0.77 and 1.36 per 100 person-years of follow-up in the rosuvastatin and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio for rosuvastatin, 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.69; P<0.00001), with corresponding rates of 0.17 and 0.37 for myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.70; P=0.0002), 0.18 and 0.34 for stroke (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.79; P=0.002), 0.41 and 0.77 for revascularization or unstable angina (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.70; P<0.00001), 0.45 and 0.85 for the combined end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.69; P<0.00001), and 1.00 and 1.25 for death from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.97; P=0.02). Consistent effects were observed in all subgroups evaluated. The rosuvastatin group did not have a significant increase in myopathy or cancer but did have a higher incidence of physician-reported diabetes.
                In this trial of apparently healthy persons without hyperlipidemia but with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, rosuvastatin significantly reduced the incidence of major cardiovascular events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00239681.)
                2008 Massachusetts Medical Society Of 17 patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) and nephrotic syndrome, 9 were allocated to treatment with simvastatin (an HMG CoA-reductase inhibitor) and low cholesterol diet, and 8 to diet alone. At entry, the treatment and control groups did not differ in mean serum creatinines, chromium-labelled EDTA clearances, urinary protein/creatinine ratios, serum albumins, and lipid profiles. The mean follow up period (+/- SEM) in the treated group was 19.3 (+/- 4.4) months compared with 16.6 (+/- 5.9) months in the control group. At the end of the trial the fall in chromium-labelled EDTA clearances was similar (-1.27 versus -1.28 mls/min/months/1.73 m2) in the treatment and control groups respectively. The mean (+/- SEM) total and LDL-cholesterol had gone from 10.5 (+/- 0.94) and 8.02 (+/- 1) mmol/l to 5.2 (+/- 0.49) and 3.47 (+/- 0.44) respectively in the treated patients. Additionally the mean (+/- SEM) albumin and urinary protein/creatinine ratio went from 25.6 (+/- 2.4) gm/l and 0.52 (+/- 0.09) gm/mmol to 45.5 (+/- 2.8) and 0.13 (+/- 0.04) respectively. There was little change in total and LDL-cholesterol; albumin and urinary protein/creatinine ratio in the control group. This study supports the observation that lowering serum cholesterol in the nephrotic syndrome reduces proteinuria and increases serum albumin levels. No difference in the rate of decline in renal function could be demonstrated. There have been no endpoint studies with statins for patients with severe renal failure. The purpose of this prospective, open, randomized, controlled study was to investigate whether atorvastatin (10 mg/day) would alter cardiovascular endpoints and the overall mortality rate of patients with chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5 (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min).
                The study subjects comprised 143 patients who were randomized either to placebo (controls; n=73; mean age 69.5 years) or to treatment with atorvastatin (n=70; mean age 67.9 years). The patients included were either non-dialysis (n=33), haemodialysis (n=97) or peritoneal dialysis (n=13) patients. Analysis focused on the primary endpoints of all-cause mortality, non-lethal acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Statistical analysis for endpoint data was mainly by intention-to-treat.
                Primary endpoints occurred in 74% of the subjects. There was no difference in outcome between the control and atorvastatin groups. The 5-year endpoint-free survival rate from study entry was 20%. Atorvastatin was withdrawn in 20% of patients due to unacceptable side-effects. In the atorvastatin group, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was reduced by 35% at 1 month and then sustained. The controls showed a progressive reduction in LDL cholesterol until 36 months.
                Although atorvastatin reduced total and LDL cholesterol effectively it was not beneficial regarding the long-term outcomes of cardiovascular endpoints or survival. In contrast to other patient groups, patients with severe chronic kidney disease, especially those on dialysis, seem to derive limited benefit from this lower dose of atorvastatin. Statin therapy has been reported to reduce the acute rejection rate following renal transplantation in a pilot study. The present study is the first randomized, double-blind and adequately powered study to examine the effect of statins on acute rejection of renal allografts.
                A total of 364 patients were randomly assigned to receive either fluvastatin 40 mg or placebo in combination with conventional cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive therapy. The primary end point was treated first acute rejection. Secondary end points included biopsy-proven rejection, histological severity of rejection, occurrence of steroid-resistant rejection, and serum creatinine at three months following transplantation.
                Fluvastatin was well tolerated; no patients developed myositis or rhabdomyolysis. There was no difference in the acute rejection rate [86 (47.3%) fluvastatin vs. 87 (47.8%) placebo] and no significant difference in the severity of rejection, steroid resistant rejection or mean serum creatinine at three months (160 micromol/L vs. 160 micromol/L). Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels increased following renal transplantation. With the exception of the increase in HDL-C, which was augmented, the increases in lipid parameters were significantly reduced by fluvastatin (total cholesterol +17.5% vs. 35.7%; LDL-C +6.3% vs. 46.7%; HDL-C +43.3% vs. 38.1%; triglyceride +52.2% vs 77.6%).
                Contrary to the reported effects of statins, fluvastatin had no effect on the incidence or severity of acute rejection following renal transplantation. There were no increases in adverse events. A significant and potentially beneficial alteration in the lipid profile was observed in the early post transplant period. We conclude that fluvastatin may be used safely to correct dyslipidemia in patients with end-stage renal failure through the peri-transplant period. Limited data describe the cardiovascular benefit of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) in people with moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD). The objective of this analysis was to determine whether pravastatin reduced the incidence of cardiovascular events in people with or at high risk for coronary disease and with concomitant moderate CKD.
                We analyzed data from the Pravastatin Pooling Project (PPP), a subject-level database combining results from 3 randomized trials of pravastatin (40 mg daily) versus placebo. Of 19 700 subjects, 4491 (22.8%) had moderate CKD, defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 to 59.99 mL/min per 1.73 m2 body surface area. The primary outcome was time to myocardial infarction, coronary death, or percutaneous/surgical coronary revascularization. Moderate CKD was independently associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.49) compared with those with normal renal function. Among the 4491 subjects with moderate CKD, pravastatin significantly reduced the incidence of the primary outcome (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.86), similar to the effect of pravastatin on the primary outcome in subjects with normal kidney function (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.94). Pravastatin also appeared to reduce the total mortality rate in those with moderate CKD (adjusted HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.00, P=0.045).
                Pravastatin reduces cardiovascular event rates in people with or at risk for coronary disease and concomitant moderate CKD, many of whom have serum creatinine levels within the normal range. Given the high risk associated with CKD, the absolute benefit that resulted from use of pravastatin was greater than in those with normal renal function. Myocardial disease without evidence of myocardial infarction is a frequent complication after cardiac surgery during cardiopulmonary bypass. Statins might be protective, but their efficacy has not been established in randomized trials.
                Two hundred patients undergoing coronary surgery were enrolled. They were randomized to rosuvastatin (20 mg/d, n = 100) or placebo (n = 100) starting 1 week before the operation. Troponin I, myoglobin, creatine kinase-MB mass, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were used as markers of myocardial injury, and their values were determined at baseline and at regular intervals after the operation. Electrocardiography and echocardiography were performed before and after the operation.
                Myocardial disease was diagnosed when troponin I, myoglobin, and creatine kinase-MB mass values were above the upper normal limit without evidence of electrocardiographic changes, echocardiographic changes, or both. The percentages of marker level increase indicative of myocardial disease were determined in the placebo versus statin groups and were as follows: troponin I, 35% versus 65% (P < .0001); myoglobin, 39% versus 72% (P < .0001); creatine kinase-MB mass, 22% versus 40% (P = .0002). Peak postoperative values of troponin I (0.16 +/- 0.15 vs 0.32 +/- 0.26 ng/mL, P = .0008), myoglobin (72.25 +/- 25 vs 98.31 +/- 31 ng/mL, P < .0001), and creatine kinase-MB mass (3.9 +/- 3.3 vs 9.3 +/- 8.1 ng/mL, P < .0001) were significantly higher in the placebo group. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein values were increased in 58% of pretreated versus 88% of the control patients (15.4 +/- 2.5 vs 17.2 +/- 3.4 mg/L, P < .0001). In high-risk patients myocardial disease was observed more frequently but significantly less in statin-pretreated patients.
                Statin pretreatment reduces myocardial damage after coronary surgery and could improve both short- and long-term results. Epidemiologic studies have shown that serum uric acid is a risk factor of coronary artery disease. In addition to fenofibrate, there is some evidence that atorvastatin may have a hypouricemic action, but the underlying mechanisms remain speculative.
                This randomized trial was conducted to investigate the effects of atorvastatin and simvastatin on uric acid homeostasis in patients treated for primary hyperlipidemia. A total of 180 patients were enrolled; patients were randomly assigned to 40 mg/d of either atorvastatin or simvastatin. Serum lipid and metabolic parameters were measured at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks of treatment; random urine samples were simultaneously obtained for creatinine, sodium, and uric acid determinations.
                Baseline serum uric acid levels correlated positively with the body mass index, serum insulin, creatinine, and triglyceride levels and inversely with serum HDL cholesterol levels. Both statins caused a favorable effect on lipids and a significant decrease in fibrinogen and high-sensitivity CRP levels. However, only atorvastatin reduced serum uric acid levels (from 5.6 +/- 1.7 to 4.9 +/- 1.5 mg/dL, P <.0001) by augmenting its urinary fractional excretion (from 10.4% +/- 7.9% to 12.0% +/- 7.4%, P <.01). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the reduction of uric acid levels was independently associated with baseline serum uric acid concentration but not to other variables, including lipid parameters (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.40; P =.008).
                Atorvastatin (but not simvastatin) significantly lowered serum uric acid levels. This result may be in favor of a preferable choice of atorvastatin for the treatment of hyperlipidemic patients presenting with hyperuricemia. Hyperlipidaemia is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease in renal transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy and possible drug-drug interactions of the new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) atorvastatin and cerivastatin in cyclosporin A (CsA)-treated renal transplant patients. Subjects and methods. Thirty patients with stable graft function and LDL cholesterol of 130 mg/dl were randomly assigned to active treatment groups (10 mg atorvastatin or 0.2 mg cerivastatin), or a control group. CsA blood trough levels were controlled on a weekly basis and adapted if they changed more than 25% from baseline values (100-150 ng/ml). Lipid levels and routine laboratory parameters before and after a treatment period of 3 months were compared.
                In the group treated with cerivastatin no significant changes in CsA blood trough levels occurred (CsA 116+/-21 ng/ml vs 110+/-20 ng/ml). In contrast, in the group treated with atorvastatin, four of 10 patients had a rise in CsA blood trough levels of more than 25% within 7-14 days of starting therapy. In the remaining patients no significant changes in CsA drug levels occurred. After therapy with atorvastatin or cerivastatin, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides were significantly lower compared with baseline conditions. No changes of CsA or lipoprotein levels were present in the control group.
                In our study population both statins were very effective in lowering elevated LDL cholesterol levels. Cerivastatin did not influence CsA blood trough levels, whereas atorvastatin increased CsA levels in four of 10 patients. Further research in a larger study is necessary in order to confirm these results and to investigate the possible reasons for this drug interaction. Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. Interruption of the renin-angiotensin system slows the progression of renal disease in patients with type 1 diabetes, but similar data are not available for patients with type 2, the most common form of diabetes. We assessed the role of the angiotensin-II-receptor antagonist losartan in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.
                A total of 1513 patients were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind study comparing losartan (50 to 100 mg once daily) with placebo, both taken in addition to conventional antihypertensive treatment (calcium-channel antagonists, diuretics, alpha-blockers, beta-blockers, and centrally acting agents), for a mean of 3.4 years. The primary outcome was the composite of a doubling of the base-line serum creatinine concentration, end-stage renal disease, or death. Secondary end points included a composite of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular causes, proteinuria, and the rate of progression of renal disease.
                A total of 327 patients in the losartan group reached the primary end point, as compared with 359 in the placebo group (risk reduction, 16 percent; P=0.02). Losartan reduced the incidence of a doubling of the serum creatinine concentration (risk reduction, 25 percent; P=0.006) and end-stage renal disease (risk reduction, 28 percent; P=0.002) but had no effect on the rate of death. The benefit exceeded that attributable to changes in blood pressure. The composite of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular causes was similar in the two groups, although the rate of first hospitalization for heart failure was significantly lower with losartan (risk reduction, 32 percent; P=0.005). The level of proteinuria declined by 35 percent with losartan (P<0.001 for the comparison with placebo).
                Losartan conferred significant renal benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy, and it was generally well tolerated. Information of the effect of statin on lipoproteins such as apolipoprotein (apo) A-I, lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)], or apolipoprotein B levels is limited. This investigation was a crossover study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin and simvastatin in patients with hyperlipidemia. Sixty-six patients were involved in the study. Group I consisted of 32 patients, who were first treated with atorvastatin (10 mg) then switched to simvastatin (10 mg). Group II consisted of 34 patients, who were first treated with simvastatin then switched to atorvastatin. Each regimen was used for 3 months (phase I), stopped for 2 months, and then restarted for another 3 months (phase II). Both statins effectively reduced total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apo B, and Lp (a) (P < 0.001 in all comparisons). A significant increase in the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was noted after both statin treatments (P < 0.05 in all comparisons). Both statins caused an increase in the apo A-I levels, and the extent of changes in apo A-I revealed no difference between the two drugs. Compared to the simvastatin group, there were more patients in the atorvastatin group achieving the National Cholesterol Education Program ATP-III LDL-C goal (P < 0.05) and European LDL-C goal (P < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated; no patient was withdrawn from the study. This study demonstrates that both statins can effectively improve lipid profiles in patients with hyperlipidemia. Atorvastatin is more effective in helping patients reach the ATP-III and European LDL-C goals than simvastatin at the same dosage. Previous studies have suggested that statins exert beneficial effects beyond their favorable lipid lowering effect. Particularly, the modification of thrombus formation and degradation, alteration in inflammatory response, plaque stabilization and improved endothelial function are thought to be responsible for additional reduction of morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular events. To date, however, it is still unclear whether these effects are elicited by all statins.
                We set out to compare in a controlled, randomized, double-blind study design the effects of almost equieffective cholesterol lowering doses of three chemically and pharmacokinetically different statins (atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin) on hemostatic and inflammatory markers in 99 hypercholesterolemic patients. At entry and 3 months after onset of statin therapy plasma cholesterol and von Willebrand factor antigen (vWf-Ag), fibrinogen, d-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1.2) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured. The effect on plasma values of F1.2, vWf-Ag, d-dimer and CRP was not significantly different between the three treatment groups. The effect of simvastatin on fibrinogen (p = 0.005) was more pronounced than the effects of atorvastatin (p = 0.48 n.s.) and pravastatin (p = 0.15 n.s.). Plasma levels of F1.2 and vWf-Ag (when data of all statins were pooled) were significantly reduced by 7% and 10% versus baseline, respectively. No significant reduction was observed for d-dimer (p = 0.26) and CRP (p = 0.5). Total plasma cholesterol levels decreased significantly (p < 0.0001 in all groups) between 22% and 29% compared to baseline.
                The present study shows similar short-term (3 months) effects of atorvastatin, simvastatin and pravastatin on selected hemostatic and inflammatory parameters in plasma in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Thus, chemical and pharmacological differences between statins appear to exert no major influence on these parameters. Mild and moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with decreased survival and increased adverse events after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therapy with clopidogrel decreases adverse events in large patient populations. Therefore, we sought to determine the efficacy and safety of long-term clopidogrel therapy in patients with CKD.
                Two thousand two patients from the CREDO trial in whom an elective PCI of a single or multiple vessels was planned were analyzed. Patients were randomly assigned to a 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel before PCI followed by clopidogrel 75 mg/d for a year versus a placebo loading dose at the time of the PCI procedure and clopidogrel 75 mg/d for 28 days and placebo for the remainder of a year. Patients were categorized by their estimated creatinine clearance (>90 [normal, n = 999], 60-89 [mild CKD, n = 672], <60 mL/min [moderate CKD, n = 331]).
                Diminished renal function was associated with worse outcomes. Patients with normal renal function who received 1 year of clopidogrel had a marked reduction in death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with those who received placebo (10.4% vs 4.4%, P < .001), whereas patients with mild and moderate CKD did not have a significant difference in outcomes with clopidogrel therapy versus placebo (mild: 12.8% vs 10.3%, P = .30; moderate: 13.1% vs 17.8%, P = .24). Clopidogrel use was associated with an increased relative risk of major or minor bleeding, but this increased risk was not different based on renal function (relative risk 1.2, 1.3, 1.1).
                Clopidogrel in mild or moderate CKD patients may not have the same beneficial effect as it does in patients with normal renal function, but was not associated with a greater relative risk of bleeding based on renal function. Further studies are needed to define the role of clopidogrel therapy in patients with CKD. Although angiotensin receptor antagonists and 3-hydroxy-3-methylgultaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) have been shown to attenuate proteinuria individually, it remains unclear whether proteinuria may be additionally improved by statin therapy in well-controlled hypertensive patients treated with angiotensin receptor antagonists-based regimen and whether withdrawal of chronic statin treatment may abrogate this beneficial effect in normolipidemic patients.
                A total of consecutive 82 proteinuric patients treated with antihypertensive agents, including losartan, were randomized 10 mg of pravastatin or placebo with a 6-month treatment. After completing 6 months of drug treatment, the pravastatin-treated patients were randomly assigned to continue (N= 19) or withdraw (N= 17) pravastatin for a further 6 months.
                Subjects treated with pravastatin had significant further improvement of proteinuria at 6 months compared with placebo group (559 +/- 251 mg/24 hours vs. 1262 +/- 557 mg/24 hours) (P < 0.0001). Of 17 patients assigned to withdraw pravastatin, proteinuria returned to the pretreatment levels and was significantly higher than those who continued treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed that proteinuric improvement was significantly correlated with the continuous statin use. Urinary excretion of endothelin-1 (ET-1) is decreased in pravastatin-treated patients, but withdrawal of statin resulted in 27% up-regulation. The linear regression models in the initial statin-treated group showed that changes in urinary ET-1 correlated with urinary protein excretion (r= 0.83, P < 0.0001).
                We conclude that pravastatin administration is associated with improved proteinuria probably by inhibiting urine ET-1 levels in patients with losartan-based treatment. However, statin withdrawal abrogates this beneficial effect in patients initially responsive to this therapy. We previously reported urinary podocytes to be a marker of glomerular injury. The aim of the present study was to determine whether cerivastatin, a newly developed, potent synthetic statin, affects proteinuria and urinary podocyte excretion in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN).
                We randomly assigned 40 normotensive hypercholesterolemic patients with CGN to receive either cerivastatin 0.15 mg/day (n=20) or placebo (n=20). Subjects comprised 24 men and 16 women, with a mean age of 40.8+/-14.4 years; 27 had IgA nephropathy and 13 had non-IgA proliferative glomerulonephritis. Treatment was continued for 6 months. Plasma total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides, urinary protein excretion and the number of podocytes were measured before treatment and at 3 and 6 months after treatment.
                After 6 months, a significant reduction in total cholesterol (P<0.001), LDL-cholesterol (P<0.001) and triglycerides (P<0.05), and a significant increase in HDL-cholesterol (P<0.001) were observed in the group treated with cerivastatin. Urinary protein excretion decreased from 1.8+/-0.6 to 0.8+/-0.4 g/day, (P<0.01) in this group, and urinary podocyte excretion decreased from 1.6+/-0.6 to 0.9+/-0.4 cells/ml (P<0.01). However, placebo showed little effect on these lipid levels, urinary protein excretion and urinary podocyte excretion. The differences between the cerivastatin group and the placebo group were significant (cholesterol, P<0.001; LDL-cholesterol, P<0.001; triglycerides, P<0.05; HDL-cholesterol, P<0.001; urinary protein, P<0.01; and urinary podocytes, P<0.01).
                Statins such as cerivastatin may be beneficial for restoration of injured podocytes in patients with CGN and hypercholesterolaemia. Inflammation contributes to the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease and elevated serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) are independently associated with increased coronary risk. This study assessed whether there were differences in the effects on CRP and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels among patients treated with three common statins. In a prospective, observational study, 80 dyslipidemic adults without evidence of cardiovascular disease were treated with 10 mg atorvastatin (A), 20 mg simvastatin (S), or 40 mg pravastatin (P) daily. CRP and lipid profiles were assayed before and after 12 weeks of therapy; in 21 patients, CRP levels were also measured after 1 and 4 weeks. The three treatment groups experienced comparable reductions in CRP (A: 33%, S: 42%, and P: 30%) and statistically insignificant changes in HDL cholesterol levels. CRP began to decrease after 1 week of treatment, and decreased further at 4 and 12 weeks of therapy. The change in the log-transformed CRP concentration correlated with the change in the log-transformed LDL cholesterol concentration. Subjects had similar baseline CRP levels, lipid profiles, and coronary risk factors. The authors conclude that at doses achieving similar reductions in LDL cholesterol, the three statins were associated with comparable decreases in CRP without significant changes in HDL cholesterol levels. The correlation between the reductions in CRP and LDL cholesterol differs from the findings of other published studies, and should prompt further investigation of the mechanism by which statins reduce CRP.
Statins significantly reduced the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in CKD patients who are not receiving renal replacement therapy. They do not impact on the decline in renal function as measured by creatinine clearance, but may reduce protein excretion in urine. Statins appear to be safe in this population.  Guidelines recommendations on hyperlipidaemia management in CKD patients could therefore be followed targeting higher proportions of patients receiving a statin, with appropriate monitoring of adverse events.