Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl GABA) in drug-resistant epilepsy. Efficacy and tolerability of acetazolamide in migraine prophylaxis: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Vigabatrin in the treatment of epilepsy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Low-dose topiramate versus lamotrigine in migraine prophylaxis (the Lotolamp study). The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial. Controlled trial of lamotrigine (Lamictal) for refractory partial seizures. Vigabatrin vs. carbamazepine monotherapy in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: a randomized response conditional cross-over study. A comparative study of vigabatrin vs. carbamazepine in monotherapy of newly diagnosed partial seizures in children. A randomised open multicentre comparative trial of lamotrigine and carbamazepine as monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent epilepsy. Comparison of the effect of topiramate and sodium valporate in migraine prevention: a randomized blinded crossover study. Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive treatment in adults with refractory partial-onset seizures: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III study. Dose-Response Study of Vigabatrin as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled complex partial seizures. A double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of vigabatrin 2 g/day and 3 g/day in uncontrolled partial seizures. Lamotrigine versus placebo in the prophylaxis of migraine with and without aura. Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis: a randomised double-blind versus placebo study. Adjuvant vigabatrin in refractory epilepsy: a ceiling to effective dosage in individual patients? Vigabatrin as add-on therapy for adult complex partial seizures: a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study. The Canadian Vigabatrin Study Group. Topiramate intervention to prevent transformation of episodic migraine: the topiramate INTREPID study. Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis--results from a placebo-controlled trial with propranolol as an active control. Double-blind study of vigabatrin in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. Topiramate for migraine prevention: a randomized controlled trial.
Vigabatrin (GVG) (3 g/day) and placebo were compared as an add-on to standard therapy in therapy-resistant epileptic patients using a double-blind crossover design with randomized treatment allocation. Twenty-three patients entered the trial, with four dropping out due to either increased seizure frequency following the cross-over from GVG to placebo (n = 1), intolerance to GVG therapy (n = 2), or poor seizure record (n = 1). Of the 19 patients who completed the study, 17 had partial seizures, eight of whom had secondary generalization and two who had primary generalized seizures. Compared with placebo, GVG was associated with a significant reduction in seizure frequency (p less than 0.01), with 11 of 19 patients experiencing greater than 50% reduction in weekly seizure occurrence, two showing a 25-50% reduction, four unchanged, and two showing an increase in seizures. Global efficacy ratings were greater in the GVG period for 15 patients (p less than 0.05) compared with one in whom there was no period difference and two in whom ratings were higher in the placebo period. Fourteen of the 19 patients indicated a preference for the GVG period. Adverse effects observed during GVG treatment were generally mild and consisted of drowsiness, confusion, nausea, irritability, and constipation. No clinically significant alterations in laboratory test results were observed. No treatment-related changes in plasma concentrations of concomitant antiepileptic drugs were noted. These results confirm the antiepileptic efficacy of oral GVG in refractory epileptics. Familial hemiplegic migraine and episodic ataxia type 2 (EA2) are allelic disorders with distinct types of mutations in the CACNA1A gene. EA2 attacks are remarkably sensitive to acetazolamide, a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. The effectiveness of acetazolamide in migraine prophylaxis is unknown.
                To evaluate the efficacy and the tolerability of acetazolamide in migraine prophylaxis.
                We compared daily oral 500 mg acetazolamide and placebo in patients with migraine in a multicentre, double-blind, randomised trial of 12 weeks duration after a run-in period of 4 weeks without treatment. Frequency of attacks at the last trial period of 4 weeks was the primary efficacy criterion. Secondary efficacy criteria were the frequency of attacks per 4 weeks, the severity and duration of attacks, the number of hours with migraine as well as the number of responders with more than 50% reduction in attack frequency.
                53 patients had been enrolled when the study was prematurely stopped because of a high number of withdrawals (34%), primarily linked to acetazolamide related side effects. Considering the primary and secondary efficacy criteria, among the 53 included patients (27 in the placebo group and 26 in the acetazolamide group), no difference between the 2 study groups could be demonstrated. The most frequent adverse events related to acetazolamide were paresthesias and asthenia.
                In this trial, migraine sufferers poorly tolerated acetazolamide given in an oral dose of 500 mg daily. No obvious prophylactic beneficial effect of acetazolamide appeared on migraine attacks. The efficacy and tolerability of vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl GABA, GVG), given as add-on therapy to 23 adult outpatients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy (17 with partial seizures), were studied using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. The study consisted of two 7-week periods during which vigabatrin and placebo were administered in random sequence. Dosage was 1.0 g twice daily for patients weighing less than or equal to 65 kg and 1.5 g twice daily for patients weighing greater than 65 kg. Three patients were dropped from the study, two for reasons unrelated to treatment and one because of the appearance of vertigo, headache, dysarthria, and ataxia, which subsided rapidly when vigabatrin was stopped (3 g daily). Sixteen of the 20 patients available for analysis showed a decrease in the total number of seizures as compared with the placebo period. Of these, 12 showed a greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency and 4 of the 12 showed a greater than 75% reduction. Both the total number of seizures and the number of partial seizures were significantly reduced by vigabatrin (p less than 0.01). Only in the patient who dropped out were severe adverse effects seen. The most frequently reported unwanted effect was mild drowsiness, which developed in seven patients on vigabatrin and in one on placebo. Positive effects, however, were also seen with six patients who reported an improved sense of well-being while receiving vigabatrin as compared with only 1 during the placebo period. No consistent changes in electrocardiogram (ECG), electroencephalogram (EEG), and visual-, auditory-, and somatosensory-evoked potentials were seen during the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To assess the efficacy and safety of topiramate and lamotrigine for prophylaxis in patients with frequent migraine as compared to each other and to placebo.
                Sixty patients with frequent migraine (more than 4 attacks per month) from the headache clinic at a tertiary referral centre in India were randomized to receive 50 mg topiramate/lamotrigine or matching placebo for 1 month each in 2 divided doses in 4 phases in a crossover manner with a washout period of 7 days in between. Primary efficacy measure was responder rate (50% decrease in mean migraine frequency/intensity). Secondary efficacy measures included reduction in mean monthly frequency, intensity, duration, rescue medication use, migraine associated symptoms, and adverse events.
                Analysis was on intention to treat basis. Data were analyzed as correlated data. Generalized estimation equation was used to compute overall mean standard deviation and 95% confidence intervals for each of the outcome variables. Bonferroni's correction done for multiple comparisons. P value of < .017 was taken as significant.
                Fifty-seven patients comprised the intent-to-treat population. Four patients withdrew from the study at various phases, none because of the side effects. Responder rate for frequency was significantly higher for topiramate versus placebo (63% vs 30%, P < .001), and versus lamotrigine (63% vs 46 %, P = .02). For intensity of headache also a responder rate of topiramate versus placebo (50% vs 10%, P < .001), and versus lamotrigine (50% vs 41%, P = .01) was observed. Topiramate showed statistically significant benefits (P < .017) in most of the secondary efficacy measures while lamotrigine was beneficial for reduction in headache frequency, and migraine associated symptoms. Adverse events were similar.
                Low-dose topiramate is efficacious in migraine prophylaxis as compared to both placebo and lamotrigine. Lamotrigine in low doses might be beneficial for headache frequency; however, longer trials are required to establish its efficacy on the intensity and frequency of migraine. Carbamazepine is widely accepted as a drug of first choice for patients with partial onset seizures. Several newer drugs possess efficacy against these seizure types but previous randomised controlled trials have failed to inform a choice between these drugs. We aimed to assess efficacy with regards to longer-term outcomes, quality of life, and health economic outcomes.
                SANAD was an unblinded randomised controlled trial in hospital-based outpatient clinics in the UK. Arm A recruited 1721 patients for whom carbamazepine was deemed to be standard treatment, and they were randomly assigned to receive carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate. Primary outcomes were time to treatment failure, and time to 12-months remission, and assessment was by both intention to treat and per protocol. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN38354748.
                For time to treatment failure, lamotrigine was significantly better than carbamazepine (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78 [95% CI 0.63-0.97]), gabapentin (0.65 [0.52-0.80]), and topiramate (0.64 [0.52-0.79]), and had a non-significant advantage compared with oxcarbazepine (1.15 [0.86-1.54]). For time to 12-month remission carbamazepine was significantly better than gabapentin (0.75 [0.63-0.90]), and estimates suggest a non-significant advantage for carbamazepine against lamotrigine (0.91 [0.77-1.09]), topiramate (0.86 [0.72-1.03]), and oxcarbazepine (0.92 [0.73-1.18]). In a per-protocol analysis, at 2 and 4 years the difference (95% CI) in the proportion achieving a 12-month remission (lamotrigine-carbamazepine) is 0 (-8 to 7) and 5 (-3 to 12), suggesting non-inferiority of lamotrigine compared with carbamazepine.
                Lamotrigine is clinically better than carbamazepine, the standard drug treatment, for time to treatment failure outcomes and is therefore a cost-effective alternative for patients diagnosed with partial onset seizures. The antiepileptic effect of lamotrigine (LTG) was assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in 24 adult patients with refractory partial seizures. LTG or placebo was added to existing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The dose of LTG varied from 75 to 400 mg daily. Three patients did not complete the trial. One was withdrawn from the trial with ataxia, tiredness, dyspnea, and diplopia while receiving LTG and died 18 days later of invasive carcinoma involving the liver. A second patient was withdrawn during baseline for contravening admission criteria, and a third received LTG in error during both treatment periods. Twenty-one patients (12 men and 9 women) completed the trial. An analysis of seizure counts in the 12-week treatment period with LTG showed a statistically significant reduction in seizures as compared with placebo for total seizures (p less than 0.002), partial seizures (p less than 0.002), and secondarily generalized seizures (p less than 0.05). The analysis of total seizure days showed a significant reduction during LTG treatment (p less than 0.002). There were no statistically significant changes in plasma concentrations of phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), primidone (PRM), or phenobarbital (PB) between the two treatment periods. The most common adverse events reported during the trial were diplopia, drowsiness, tiredness, ataxia, and headache, but although these were more frequent during LTG treatment, the differences from placebo were not statistically significant. No hematological or biochemical changes were noted. The clinical efficacy and safety of vigabatrin (VGB) as add-on therapy for pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsies is well established. However, for an objective evaluation, the effects of the drug in the monotherapy of newly diagnosed subjects should be determined. With this aim, VGB was compared, in a randomized, response conditional cross-over study, with carbamazepine (CBZ), the most widely prescribed drug in focal epilepsies. Fifty-one patients with complex partial (CP) seizures were randomly assigned to either the VGB or the CBZ group and evaluated after an initial 4 month period. The cross-over to the alternative drug was carried out, for an analogous period, only in cases with persisting seizures or in the presence of intolerable side effects. Patients who did not respond to either drug were subsequently treated with a combination of VGB and CBZ. No significant difference was revealed in the efficacies of VGB and CBZ; a complete control of seizures was obtained in 17/37 patients (45.9%) treated with VGB and in 20/39 patients (51.3%) treated with CBZ. The side effects were somewhat more frequent (41%) and severe with CBZ than with VGB (21.6%). The power to detect a 20% difference between the two drugs was 75%. The combination of the two drugs suppressed the seizures in 5 out of 14 resistant cases. The preliminary results in this small number of patients are encouraging and suggest that VGB may be considered as a first-line drug for epilepsy with CP seizures and as a valid alternative when other monotherapies are ineffective or poorly tolerated. Carbamazepine (CBZ) is a drug of choice for the treatment of simple or complex partial seizures and secondary generalized seizures in adults and children. Vigabatrin (VGB) is a relatively new second line antiepileptic drug and was first registered for use in Poland more than ten years ago. Few reports have been published on the comparison of efficacy of VGB in children with epilepsy. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy and EEG effects of initial VGB monotherapy compared with initial CBZ monotherapy in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy. We present results of a prospective, outpatient and open study carried out in the University Hospital Center in Białystok. Twenty-six children with partial epilepsy treated with VGB and 28 patients treated with CBZ were studied. The evaluation of the efficacy of the two drugs did not reveal any significant differences. Very good (reduction > 75%) seizure control was achieved in 22 out of 26 patients (84.6%) in the VGB group. One patient had a 50-75% decrease of seizures (good effect), similarly one child had a 25-50% reduction of seizures (mild effect). In two patients, we observed increased seizures (myoclonic jerks). Very good seizure control was achieved in 17 out of 28 patients (60.7%) in the CBZ group. Good seizure control was achieved in 5 out of 28 patients (17.8%) and mild control was seen in two children. No improvement was observed in 4 (14%) of the patients. The EEG background activity was improved in VGB-treated patients. No effect on the EEG background activity was observed in CBZ-treated children. VGB seems to be a safe and effective antiepileptic drug as primary monotherapy for epilepsy in children with similar proportion of side effects as CBZ. The efficacy and safety of lamotrigine and carbamazepine as monotherapy in patients with untreated, newly diagnosed or recurrent partial and/or generalised tonic-clonic seizures, were compared in a randomised, open, multicentre study. Patients received 24 weeks' treatment with oral lamotrigine 100 mg (LTG 100, n = 115) or 200 mg (LTG 200, n = 111) or carbamazepine 600 mg (CBZ 600, n = 117). Efficacy measurements were comparable between the three treatment groups, although the higher lamotrigine dose was possibly most effective, with 60.4% completing seizure free compared with 51.3% (LTG 100) and 54.7% (CBZ 600). Both dosage regimens of lamotrigine were well tolerated. More patients on CBZ 600 reported adverse experiences, 66% versus 53% (LTG 100) and 58% (LTG 200), and of these a greater proportion were attributed to CBZ 600 treatment, 53% versus 23% (LTG 100) and 28% (LTG 200). Similarly, a greater proportion of the CBZ 600 group required a change in dose, 47% versus 20% (LTG 100) and 17% (LTG 200) or withdrew completely due to adverse experiences, 10.3% versus 4.3% (LTG 100) and 4.5% (LTG 200). The most common adverse experience leading to withdrawal was rash, with approximately double the proportion of reports occurring in patients on CBZ 600 (5.1%) compared with lamotrigine (1.7% on LTG 100 and 2.7% on LTG 200). Overall lamotrigine appeared equally effective but better tolerated compared with carbamazepine. Topiramate and sodium valporate are anticonvulsants, demonstrated to be effective as monotherapy for migraine prevention in placebo-controlled trials.
                To compare the relative efficacy of topiramate and sodium valporate in the prevention of migraine.
                A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover, clinical trial was conducted from October 2003 to September 2004. A total of 64 patients with migraine headache, aged 14 to 57 years, were randomly allocated to the 2 treatment groups. The first group received topiramate (25 mg daily increment over 1 week to 50 mg) for a total of 2 months. The second group received sodium valporate (200 mg daily increment over 1 week to 400 mg) for 2 months. Response to treatment was assessed at 0, 1, 8, 16, and 24 weeks after start of therapy.
                Topiramate appeared to be equivalent in efficacy and safety to sodium valporate. A significant decrease in duration, monthly frequency, and intensity of headache occurred in both groups. Of the 32 patients treated with sodium valporate, the mean standard deviation (SD) of monthly migraine frequency decreased from 5.4 (2.5) to 4.0 (2.8) episode per month, headache intensity from 7.7 (1.2) to 5.8 (1.7) by visual analog scale (VAS), and headache duration from 21.3 (14.6) to 12.3 (10.7) hours (P < .001). Correspondingly, in the 32 patients treated with topiramate, the mean SD of monthly headache frequency decreased from 5.4 (2.0) to 3.2 (1.9) per month, headache intensity from 6.9 (1.2) to 3.7 (1.3), and headache duration from 17.3 (8.4) to 3.9 (2.7) hours (P < .001).
                This study demonstrates that treatment with topiramate and sodium valporate both significantly reduce migraine headache. This effect of topiramate and sodium valporate has previously been shown to reduce migraine headache, and we postulate that treatment with topiramate and sodium valporate may have a similar benefit. To study the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial seizures in adults with >or=4 partial-onset seizures (simple or complex, with or without secondary generalization) per 4 weeks despite treatment with 1-2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).
                This multicenter, parallel-group study had an 8-week, single-blind, placebo baseline phase, after which patients were randomized to placebo (n = 102) or once-daily ESL 400 mg (n = 100), 800 mg (n = 98), or 1,200 mg (n = 102) in the double-blind treatment phase. ESL starting dose was 400 mg; thereafter, ESL was titrated at weekly 400-mg steps to the full maintenance dose (12 weeks).
                Seizure frequency adjusted per 4 weeks over the maintenance period (primary endpoint) was significantly lower than placebo in the ESL 1,200-mg (p = 0.0003) and 800-mg (p = 0.0028) groups [analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) of log-transformed seizure frequency]. Responder rate was 20% (placebo), 23% (400 mg), 34% (800 mg), and 43% (1,200 mg). Median relative reduction in seizure frequency was 16% (placebo), 26% (400 mg), 36% (800 mg), and 45% (1,200 mg). The most frequent concomitant AEDs were carbamazepine (56-62% of patients), lamotrigine (25-27%), and valproic acid (22-28%). Similar efficacy results were obtained in patients administered ESL with or without carbamazepine as concomitant AED. Discontinuation rates caused by adverse events (AEs) were 3.9% (placebo), 4% (400 mg), 8.2% (800 mg), and 19.6% (1,200 mg). AEs in >10% of any group were dizziness, headache, and diplopia. Most AEs were mild or moderate.
                ESL, 800 and 1,200 mg once-daily, was well tolerated and more effective than placebo in patients who were refractory to treatment with one or two concomitant AEDs. This placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study examined the efficacy and safety of three daily doses of vigabatrin (VGB; 1, 3, or 6 g) as add-on therapy in 174 patients with previously uncontrolled complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalization.
                A 12-week pretreatment assessment period was followed by drug therapy with a 6-week titration period and a 12-week maintenance phase.
                VGB doses of 3 and 6 g/day reduced median monthly frequency of seizures by 4.3 and 4.5 seizures, respectively, compared with 0.2 seizures for placebo (p = 0.0001). The percentages of patients classified as therapeutic successes (> or =50% reduction in seizure frequency) were 7% for placebo and 24, 51, and 54% for patients taking daily VGB doses of 1, 3, and 6 g, respectively; the comparison with placebo was significant for all treatment groups. The linear trend for dose response was highly significant (p< or =0.0001) for both median monthly seizure frequency and therapeutic success. Vigabatrin was well tolerated, causing no clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters, brain magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials, cognitive function, or psychosocial tests. Fatigue, drowsiness, and dizziness were the most common treatment-related adverse events in all treatment groups. Dropouts due to adverse events were higher in the 6-g/day group.
                VGB was significantly more effective than placebo as add-on therapy in reducing seizure frequency. VGB at 3 and 6 g/day produced the best efficacy: however, adverse events may limit the use of the 6-g/day dose in some patients. The efficacy and tolerability of vigabatrin as add-on therapy was assessed in patients with uncontrolled partial seizures. Ninety-seven patients entered this seven-centre, double-blind, placebo-crossover study. Vigabatrin (2 g or 3 g) or placebo was administered daily. Vigabatrin was well-tolerated and did not cause clinically significant adverse drug effects when added to established anticonvulsant therapy. No significant differences were observed between dose groups for the overall incidence of adverse events, although drowsiness and visual disturbances (diplopia, ataxia, visual abnormalities) showed a dose-related increase with vigabatrin treatment. The results of this study indicate that vigabatrin, given in a daily dose of either 2 g or 3 g is significantly more effective than placebo in reducing seizure frequency among patients with partial seizures. Lamotrigine blocks voltage-sensitive sodium channels, leading to inhibition of neuronal release of glutamate. Release of glutamate may be essential in the propagation of spreading cortical depression, which some believe is central to the genesis of migraine attacks. This study compared safety and efficacy of lamotrigine and placebo in migraine prophylaxis in a double-blind randomized parallel-groups trial. A total of 110 patients entered; after a 1-month placebo run-in period, placebo-responders and non-compliers were excluded, leaving 77 to be treated with lamotrigine (n = 37) or placebo (n = 40) for up to 3 months. Initially, lamotrigine therapy was commenced at the full dose of 200 mg/day, but, following a high incidence of skin rashes, a slow dose-escalation was introduced: 25 mg/day for 2 weeks, 50 mg/day for 2 weeks, then 200 mg/day. Attack rates were reduced from baseline means of 3.6 per month on lamotrigine and 4.4 on placebo to 3.2 and 3.0 respectively during the last month of treatment. Improvements were greater on placebo and these changes, not statistically significant, indicate that lamotrigine is ineffective for migraine prophylaxis. There were more adverse events on lamotrigine than on placebo, most commonly rash. With slow dose-escalation their frequency was reduced and the rate of withdrawal for adverse events was similar in both treatment groups. The objectives of this paper are to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate, given at the dose of 100 mg/day, in the prophylactic treatment of migraine. The hypothesis that migraine is the result of a condition of neuronal hyperexcitability and the quest for drugs that are able to limit the number of crises justifies the attempt to utilise the new antiepileptic drugs in the prophylaxis of this pathology, which is so important due to its high prevalence and due to the high disability it causes. The study was randomised double-blind versus placebo, lasting 16 weeks, and was preceded by a run-in period of 4 weeks. One hundred and fifteen patients were randomly allocated to treatment with topiramate (TPM) or placebo: 35 patients completed the study in the TPM group and 37 patients in the placebo group. At the end of the double-blind phase of study, in the TPM group, we recorded a significant reduction in the frequency of migraine crises (from 5.26 at baseline to 2.60 in the last 4 weeks), a significant reduction in the quantity of symptomatic drugs taken as compared to the placebo control group (from 6.17+/-1.80 SD to 2.57+/-0.80) and a significant downward trend in the number of days of disability over the 16-week period of therapy. In the TPM group, side effects were transient and well tolerated. TPM has thus proven its efficacy and tolerability in the prophylaxis of migraine. A double-blind, randomized, cross-over study of additional vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl-GABA, VGB, 1.0 g twice daily for 6 weeks, followed by 1.5 g twice daily for 6 weeks) and matched placebo was undertaken in 24 patients with refractory epilepsy. Nineteen completed the trial satisfactorily. Fewer seizure days were reported during VGB treatment [placebo 41, VGB 23, p < 0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.5 to -14]. An overall reduction in median seizure numbers failed to reach statistical significance (n = 19; placebo 52, VGB 32, NS, 95% CI -18 to +24). Subgroup analysis, however, showed a significant reduction in partial seizures (n = 17) with 2 g VGB daily (placebo 22, VGB 13, p < 0.05, 95% CI -0.5 to -16.5), but not with higher dosage (placebo 28, VGB 22, NS, 95% CI -18 to +11). A deterioration in control of partial seizures as compared with the equivalent placebo phase was observed when patients were changed from 2 to 3 g/day VGB (2 g VGB 13, 3 g VGB 22, p = 0.05, 95% CI 0 to +20). Loss of efficacy was noted in 3 patients, and seizure control worsened slightly in 5 others. One previously resistant patient developed a therapeutic response, and 2 other patients reported an additional useful reduction in seizures. In the remaining 8 patients, seizure frequency did not change. VGB did not appear to benefit tonic-clonic seizures. Serum VGB concentrations were higher during treatment with 3 g (15.5 +/- 8.9 mg/L) daily than with 2 g (13.5 +/- 11.2 mg/L). No important alterations were noted in the concentrations of concomitantly administered antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) throughout the trial. VGB is useful adjuvant therapy for treatment of partial seizures. There may be a ceiling to effective dosage. This demands individual dose titration for each patient. Vigabatrin (VGB) is a novel antiepileptic drug effective as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures. In this study, the efficacy and tolerability of VGB as adjunctive therapy were evaluated in patients with refractory epilepsy. Adult patients with a definite diagnosis of complex partial seizures and/or partial seizures secondarily generalized were recruited from 10 Canadian centres. Patients were randomized to receive either active medication or placebo in a double- blind fashion and entered a 36-week titration and maintenance phase with regularly scheduled visits. Both efficacy parameters and safety assessments were monitored. Clinical laboratory, evoked potential studies, MRI, and neuropsychological tests were also performed. Forty-eight percent of VGB-treated patients vs. 26 percent of placebo-treated patients had a 50 percent or greater reduction in the frequency of complex partial seizures and partial seizures secondarily generalized. Vigabatrin was well tolerated by the majority of patients. Minor neurological side effects were observed in a number of patients in both treatment groups. No serious systemic toxicity was observed. No changes in evoked potential studies or MRI findings were noted. Vigabatrin was found to be an effective and well-tolerated antiepileptic drug when used as adjunctive therapy in patients with difficult to control complex partial seizures and for partial seizures secondarily generalized. Vigabatrin is a selective irreversible inhibitor of the GABA- degradating enzyme GABA transaminase and has shown efficacy in a number of clinical trials in patients with difficult to control partial seizures. Vigabatrin has been found most effective against complex partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures in both adults and children. Vigabatrin has also been shown to reduce infantile spasms secondary to various aetiologies and is most effective in spasms associated with tuberous sclerosis. The aim of this study was to further extend the clinical experience with VGB as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of adult patients with difficult to control complex partial seizures and/or partial seizures secondarily generalized. In addition to the assessments of efficacy and tolerability to VGB, neuropsychological evaluations were also carried out.
                Copyright 2000 BEA Trading Ltd. The study sought to evaluate whether topiramate prevents development of chronic daily headache (CDH, ≥15 headache days per month) in adult subjects with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM, 9-14 migraine headache days/month). A secondary objective was to assess the efficacy of topiramate as preventive migraine treatment in this population.
                This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing topiramate 100 mg/day and placebo for 26 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was new-onset CDH at month 6. Secondary efficacy measures included migraine and headache days. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated.
                A total of 159 topiramate subjects and 171 placebo subjects were efficacy-evaluable. At month 6, 1.4% of topiramate subjects versus 2.3% of placebo subjects had CDH (p = .589). Compared with placebo, topiramate treatment was associated with statistically significant reductions in mean number of migraine days (6.6 vs. 5.3/28 days; p = .001) and headache days (6.6 vs 5.3/28 days; p = .001). Most commonly reported AEs in the topiramate versus placebo group included paresthesia (32.4% vs. 7.0%), fatigue (14.8% vs. 8.6%), dizziness (11.4% vs. 7.6%) and nausea (10.8% vs. 9.2%).
                Topiramate 100 mg/day did not prevent the development of CDH at six months in subjects with HFEM. Topiramate was effective in reducing headache days and migraine headache days and generally well tolerated. Topiramate (TPM) has shown efficacy in migraine prophylaxis in two large placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trials. We conducted a randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses of topiramate vs placebo for migraine prophylaxis, with propranolol (PROP) as an active control. Subjects with episodic migraine with and without aura were randomised to TPM 100 mg/d, TPM 200 mg/d, PROP 160 mg/d (active control), or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the change in mean monthly migraine frequency from the baseline phase relative to the double-blind treatment phase. Five hundred and seventy-five subjects were enrolled from 61 centres in 13 countries. TPM 100 mg/d was superior to placebo as measured by reduction in monthly migraine frequency, overall 50% responder rate, reduction in monthly migraine days, and reduction in the rate of daily rescue medication use. The TPM 100 mg/d and PROP groups were similar with respect to reductions in migraine frequency, responder rate, migraine days, and daily rescue medication usage. TPM 100 mg/d was better tolerated than TPM 200 mg/d, and was generally comparable to PROP. No unusual or unexpected safety risks emerged. These findings demonstrate that TPM 100 mg/d is effective in migraine prophylaxis. TPM 100 mg/d and PROP 160 mg/d exhibited similar efficacy profiles. Thirty-one patients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy entered the study. Vigabatrin (2 to 3 g/d, stratified according to weight) and placebo were administered orally, as add-on therapy in random order under double-blind conditions, each for three months using a crossover design. Thirty patients completed both periods. Of these, ten patients (33%) showed a decrease in seizure frequency of 50% or more. In the 15 patients presenting with complex partial seizures, "temporal" electroencephalographic abnormalities, and relatively low seizure frequency, there was a significant reduction in seizure frequency during vigabatrin treatment. No significant treatment effect was found for the remaining 15 patients, who presented with mixed seizure types, multifocal electroencephalographic abnormalities, and high seizure frequencies. Tolerability to vigabatrin was good; the most frequently reported unwanted effect was drowsiness. Plasma concentrations of phenytoin showed a significant reduction during the vigabatrin period. The results demonstrate the efficacy and good tolerability of vigabatrin therapy in patients with severe complex partial epilepsy. Small open-label and controlled trials suggest that the antiepileptic drug topiramate is effective for migraine prevention.
                To assess the efficacy and safety of topiramate for migraine prevention in a large controlled trial.
                A 26-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted during outpatient treatment at 52 North American clinical centers. Patients were aged 12 to 65 years and had a 6-month history of migraine (International Headache Society criteria) and 3 to 12 migraines a month but no more than 15 headache days a month during a 28-day prospective baseline phase.
                After a washout period, patients meeting entry criteria were randomized to topiramate (50, 100, or 200 mg/d) or placebo. Topiramate was titrated by 25 mg/wk for 8 weeks to the assigned or maximum tolerated dose, whichever was less. Patients continued receiving that dose for 18 weeks.
                The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline in mean monthly migraine frequency. Secondary efficacy measures included responder rate (proportion of patients with > or =50% reduction in monthly migraine frequency), reductions in mean number of monthly migraine days, severity, duration, and days a month requiring rescue medication, and adverse events. The month of onset of preventive treatment action was assessed.
                Of 483 patients randomized, 468 provided at least 1 postbaseline efficacy assessment and comprised the intent-to-treat population. Mean monthly migraine frequency decreased significantly for patients receiving topiramate at 100 mg/d (-2.1, P =.008) and topiramate at 200 mg/d (-2.4, P<.001) vs placebo (-1.1). Statistically significant reductions (P<.05) occurred within the first month with topiramate at 100 and 200 mg/d. The responder rate was significantly greater with topiramate at 50 mg/d (39%, P =.01), 100 mg/d (49%, P<.001), and 200 mg/d (47%, P<.001) vs placebo (23%). Reductions in migraine days were significant for the 100-mg/d (P =.003) and 200-mg/d (P<.001) topiramate groups. Rescue medication use was reduced in the 100-mg/d (P =.01) and 200-mg/d (P =.005) topiramate groups. Adverse events resulting in discontinuation in the topiramate groups included paresthesia, fatigue, and nausea.
                Topiramate showed significant efficacy in migraine prevention within the first month of treatment, an effect maintained for the duration of the double-blind phase.
Anticonvulsants appear to be both effective in reducing migraine frequency and reasonably well tolerated. There is noticeable variation among individual agents, but there are insufficient data to know whether this is due to chance or variation in true efficacy. Acetazolamide, clonazepam, lamotrigine and vigabatrin were not superior to placebo (one trial each). Relatively few robust trials are available for agents other than sodium valproate/divalproex sodium and topiramate; gabapentin in particular needs further evaluation. Trials designed with sufficient power to compare different drugs are also necessary.