A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Bispectral index-guided general anesthesia in combination with thoracic epidural analgesia reduces recovery time in fast-track colon surgery. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Thoracic epidural analgesia in obese patients with body mass index of more than 30 kg/m2 for off pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Double-masked randomized trial comparing alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in abdominal aortic surgery. Extubation time, hemodynamic stability, and postoperative pain control in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: an evaluation of fentanyl, remifentanil, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs with propofol for perioperative and postoperative management. A randomized controlled trial comparing an intraoperative goal-directed strategy with routine clinical practice in patients undergoing peripheral arterial surgery. Epidural anesthesia for coronary artery bypass surgery compared with general anesthesia alone does not reduce biochemical markers of myocardial damage. Comparison of the modulatory effects of four different fast-track anesthetic techniques on the inflammatory response to cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Closed-circuit isoflurane-based anesthesia provides better fast-tracking anesthesia than fentanyl/propofol-based anesthesia for off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Fast-track in open intestinal surgery: prospective randomized study (Clinical Trials Gov Identifier no. NCT00123456). A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. Thoracic epidural anesthesia for cardiac surgery: the effects on tracheal intubation time and length of hospital stay. Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomized, controlled Veterans Affairs cooperative study. Hemodynamic effects, myocardial ischemia, and timing of tracheal extubation with propofol-based anesthesia for cardiac surgery. Gastric intramucosal pH-guided therapy in patients after elective repair of infrarenal abdominal aneurysms: is it beneficial? Thoracic epidural anesthesia improves early outcomes in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery. [Comparison of a propofol-based anesthesia regimen using optimated-target-controlled-infusion (OTCI) and manually-controlled infusion (MCI) technique]. Recovery from bispectral index-guided anaesthesia in a large randomized controlled trial of patients at high risk of awareness. Effect of antagonism of mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block on postoperative emesis in children. The effect of cerebral monitoring on recovery after general anesthesia: a comparison of the auditory evoked potential and bispectral index devices with standard clinical practice. A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to epidural analgesia after thoracic surgery. [Isoflurane anesthesia with combined use of low dose fentanyl for open heart surgery].
A fast-track program is a multimodal approach for patients undergoing colonic surgery that combines stringent regimens of perioperative care (fluid restriction, optimized analgesia, forced mobilization, and early oral feeding) to reduce perioperative morbidity, hospital stay, and cost. We investigated the impact of a fast-track protocol on postoperative morbidity in patients after open colonic surgery.
                A randomized trial of patients in 4 teaching hospitals in Switzerland included 156 patients undergoing elective open colonic surgery who were assigned to either a fast-track program or standard care. The primary end point was the 30-day complication rate. Secondary end points were severity of complications, hospital stay, and compliance with the fast-track protocol.
                The fast-track protocol significantly decreased the number of complications (16 of 76 in the fast-track group vs 37 of 75 in the standard care group; P = .0014), resulting in shorter hospital stays (median, 5 days; range, 2-30 vs 9 days, respectively; range, 6-30; P < .0001). There was a trend toward less severe complications in the fast-track group. A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed fluid administration greater than the restriction limits (odds ratio, 4.198; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-10.366; P = .002) and a nonfunctioning epidural analgesia (odds ratio, 3.365; 95% confidence interval, 1.367-8.283; P = .008) as independent predictors of postoperative complications.
                The fast-track program reduces the rate of postoperative complications and length of hospital stay and should be considered as standard care. Fluid restriction and an effective epidural analgesia are the key factors that determine outcome of the fast-track program. The impact of bispectral index (BIS)-guided general anesthesia on recovery from general anesthesia has been evaluated in different patient populations. The benefit of using BIS has been inconsistent. We designed this study to examine the value of BIS-guided anesthesia in a fast-track setting where the goal is rapid recovery.
                Forty-four patients undergoing open colon resection were randomly assigned to receive either BIS-guided (BIS group, n = 22) or clinically guided (standard care group, n = 22) total IV anesthesia with propofol after placing a thoracic epidural catheter. Duration of postanesthesia care unit stay, time to tracheal extubation, direct drug cost, the incidence of hemodynamic abnormalities, ability of ambulation on the day of surgery, and patient satisfaction with anesthetic management were assessed.
                In the BIS-guided group, tracheal extubation was achieved significantly earlier (7.6 vs. 15.4 min, P < 0.01) and the postanesthesia care unit stay was significantly shorter (51 vs. 85 min, P < 0.01). Total anesthetic drug cost was reduced by 23% and the incidence of hypotension requiring treatment was significantly lower in the BIS group. Early ambulation, patient satisfaction, and incidence of adverse events were not significantly different between the groups.
                BIS-guided IV anesthesia in combination with thoracic epidural analgesia facilitates rapid recovery and reduces the overall cost of care in patients undergoing fast-track colon surgery. Several studies have shown that goal-directed hemodynamic and fluid optimization may result in improved outcome. However, the methods used were either invasive or had other limitations. The aim of this study was to perform intraoperative goal-directed therapy with a minimally invasive, easy to use device (FloTrac/Vigileo), and to evaluate possible improvements in patient outcome determined by the duration of hospital stay and the incidence of complications compared to a standard management protocol.
                In this randomized, controlled trial 60 high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were included. Patients were allocated into either an enhanced hemodynamic monitoring group using a cardiac index based intraoperative optimization protocol (FloTrac/Vigileo device, GDT-group, n = 30) or a standard management group (Control-group, n = 30), based on standard monitoring data.
                The median duration of hospital stay was significantly reduced in the GDT-group with 15 (12 - 17.75) days versus 19 (14 - 23.5) days (P = 0.006) and fewer patients developed complications than in the Control-group [6 patients (20%) versus 15 patients (50%), P = 0.03]. The total number of complications was reduced in the GDT-group (17 versus 49 complications, P = 0.001).
                In high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, implementation of an intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic optimization protocol using the FloTrac/Vigileo device was associated with a reduced length of hospital stay and a lower incidence of complications compared to a standard management protocol.
                Clinical trial registration information: Unique identifier: NCT00549419. Perioperative Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is an important part of a multimodal approach to improve analgesia and patient outcome after cardiac and thoracic surgery. This is particularly important for obese patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB). We conducted a randomized clinical trial at tertiary care cardiac institute to compare the effect of TEA and conventional opioid based analgesia on perioperative lung functions and pain scores in obese patients undergoing OPCAB. Sixty obese patients with body mass index >30 kg/m2 for elective OPCAB were randomized into two groups (n=30 each). Patients in both the groups received general anesthesia but in group 1, TEA was also administered. We performed spirometry as preoperative assessment and at six hours, 24 hours, second, third, fourth and fifth day after extubation, along with arterial blood gases analysis. Visual analogue scale at rest and on coughing was recorded to assess the degree of analgesia. The other parameters observed were: time to endotracheal extubation, oxygen withdrawal time and intensive care unit length of stay. On statistical analysis there was a significant difference in Vital Capacity at six hours, 24 hours, second and third day postextubation. Forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second followed the same pattern for first four postoperative days and peak expiratory flow rate remained statistically high till second postoperative day. ABG values and PaO2/FiO2 ratio were statistically higher in the study group up to five days. Visual analogue scale at rest and on coughing was significantly lower till fourth and third postoperative day respectively. Tracheal extubation time, oxygen withdrawal time and ICU stay were significantly less in group 1. The use of TEA resulted in better analgesia, early tracheal extubation and shorter ICU stay and should be considered for obese patients undergoing OPCAB. Improvement in patient outcome and reduced use of medical resources may result from using epidural anesthesia and analgesia as compared with general anesthesia and intravenous opioids, although the relative importance of intraoperative versus postoperative technique has not been studied. This prospective, double-masked, randomized clinical trial was designed to compare alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with respect to postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery of the abdominal aorta.
                One hundred sixty-eight patients undergoing surgery of the abdominal aorta were randomly assigned to receive either thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with a light general anesthesia or general anesthesia alone intraoperatively and either intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia postoperatively (four treatment groups). Patient-controlled analgesia was continued for at least 72 h. Protocols were used to standardize perioperative medical management and to preserve masking intraoperatively and postoperatively. A uniform surveillance strategy was used for the identification of prospectively defined postoperative complications. Outcome evaluation included postoperative hospital length of stay, direct medical costs, selected postoperative morbidities, and postoperative recovery milestones.
                Length of stay and direct medical costs for patients surviving to discharge were similar among the four treatment groups. Postoperative outcomes were similar among the four treatment groups with respect to death, myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia, reoperation, pneumonia, and renal failure. Epidural patient-controlled analgesia was associated with a significantly shorter time to extubation (P = 0.002). Times to intensive care unit discharge, ward admission, first bowel sounds, first flatus, tolerating clear liquids, tolerating regular diet, and independent ambulation were similar among the four treatment groups. Postoperative pain scores were also similar among the four treatment groups.
                In patients undergoing surgery of the abdominal aorta, thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with a light general anesthesia and followed by either intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia, offers no major advantage or disadvantage when compared with general anesthesia alone followed by either intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia. To compare three anesthetic strategies with respect to the time of extubation after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and to assess patient satisfaction with the procedure.
                Prospective, randomized, clinical study.
                Tertiary-care referral center.
                180 cardiac surgical patients undergoing primary CABG from January through June 2004.
                After induction of general anesthesia, patients were allocated to one of three groups. All three groups received a continuous infusion of intravenous (IV) propofol perioperatively and postoperatively. Group 1 (fentanyl infusion group, n = 60) received continuous IV fentanyl infusion perioperatively and postoperatively for analgesia. Group 2 (diclofenac group, n = 60) received fentanyl bolus doses intraoperatively and diclofenac suppository postoperatively. Group 3 (remifentanil group, n = 60) received continuous infusion of IV remifentanil perioperatively and IV fentanyl as an immediate postoperative bolus followed by continuous fentanyl infusion. Duration of postoperative ventilation up to the time of extubation, inotrope requirement, time at which analgesic infusion was discontinued, postextubation arterial blood gas analysis, pain evaluation via visual analog scale, need for rescue analgesia, awareness during surgery, and length of postcardiac surgical unit stay, were evaluated in each patient.
                The diclofenac group exhibited the shortest time to extubation, the least inotrope use, and the fewest rescue doses of analgesic than did patients of the other two groups.
                Intravenous propofol with bolus doses of IV fentanyl intraoperatively in combination with postoperative nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs had the best recovery profile in patients undergoing primary CABG than did the other two regimens studied. We hypothesized that, in vascular surgery patients, the application of a goal-directed strategy based on a pulse contour-derived cardiac index would be associated with a better haemodynamic status than the application of routine perioperative care and that the amount of fluid and/or inotropes required in such a goal-directed therapy depended on the general anaesthetic technique used.
                Patients undergoing peripheral arterial bypass grafting were randomly assigned to three groups. In group 1, haemodynamic management was performed according to routine clinical practice. In the two other groups (groups 2 and 3) a goal-directed therapy was applied aiming to maintain the pulse contour-derived cardiac index above 2.5 l m min. Patients in groups 1 and 2 received sevoflurane-based anaesthesia and patients in group 3 propofol-based anaesthesia. Haemodynamic variables, amount of fluid and administration of inotropes were assessed at different time intervals.
                The amount of fluid administered was not significantly different between the groups. Two patients in group 1, 13 patients in group 2 and 12 patients in group 3 were treated with dobutamine (P < 0.001). None of the patients anaesthetized with sevoflurane (groups 1 and 2) experienced postoperative cardiovascular complications, whereas four patients in the total intravenous group (group 3) experienced major postoperative cardiovascular complications (P = 0.005).
                In the conditions of the present study, the application of a goal-directed therapy aiming to maintain the cardiac index above 2.5 l min m did not result in a higher tissue oxygen delivery than when applying the standard haemodynamic strategy nor did it depend on the anaesthetic technique used. High thoracic epidural anesthesia/analgesia (HTEA) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery may have myocardial protective effects. In this prospective randomized controlled study, we investigated the effect of HTEA for elective CABG surgery on the release of troponin I, time to tracheal extubation, and analgesia. One-hundred-twenty patients were randomized to a general anesthesia (GA) group or a GA plus HTEA group. The GA group received fentanyl (7-15 microg/kg) and a morphine infusion. The HTEA group received fentanyl (5-7 microg/kg) and an epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% and fentanyl 2 microg/mL until postoperative Day 3. There were no differences in troponin I levels between study groups. The time to tracheal extubation [median (interquartile range)] in the HTEA group was 15 min (10-320 min), compared with 430 min (284-590 min) in the GA group (P < 0.0001). Analgesia was improved in the HTEA group compared with the GA group. Mean arterial blood pressure poststernotomy and systemic vascular resistance in the intensive care unit were lower in the HTEA group. We conclude that HTEA for CABG surgery had no effect on troponin release but improved postoperative analgesia and was associated with a reduced time to extubation. To test the hypothesis that the choice of anesthesia technique for coronary artery surgery influences the degree and magnitude of the subsequent inflammatory response and its consequences.
                Prospective, randomized, comparative study.
                Major university teaching hospital.
                Sixty patients undergoing elective surgery.
                Patients were randomized into an alfentanil group, a high-dose remifentanil group, a low-dose remifentanil group, or a thoracic epidural group, in combination with a propofol target-controlled infusion. The study was blinded for the opioid, except in the epidural group. Tight control of perioperative hemodynamic parameters was maintained, and the postoperative management was strictly standardized. Bactericidal permeability-increasing protein as an indicator of the polymorphonuclear neutrophil response, interleukin-6 as an inducer of the acute-phase response, and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and C-reactive protein as parameters of the acute phase response were determined at regular intervals. Ventilator dependency and analgesia were evaluated as clinical outcome measures.
                Interleukin-6 levels increased in all groups. Plasma levels in the epidural group were significantly higher at all time points than in the other groups. The increase in the plasma levels of bactericidal permeability-increasing protein, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, and C-reactive protein showed the same pattern in all groups, and no significant differences among the 4 groups were observed.
                Supplementation of a fast-track anesthetic technique with epidural analgesia preserves hemodynamic stability and is associated with faster extubation times (p = 0.003) and less postoperative pain (p = 0.045). Thoracic epidural analgesia was associated with significantly higher levels of IL-6 throughout the study period as compared with the total intravenous anesthesia groups. The exact clinical relevance of this finding remains unclear. In recent years, low-dose fentanyl combined with short-acting hypnotic drug has been thought to be better than traditional high-dose fentanyl in cardiac anesthesia. On the other hand, the practice of closed-circuit inhaled anesthesia offers many advantages, including hemodynamic stability, maintenance of adequate anesthesia depth and early recovery. This study sought to evaluate the effect of closed-circuit isoflurane-based anesthesia (CIA) and fentanyl/propofol-based anesthesia (FPA) on off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCABG) surgery.
                Fifty patients scheduled for elective OPCABG surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either CIA (n = 25) or FPA (n = 25). In the CIA group, anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 2 microg/kg and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg, followed by 2% isoflurane in oxygen (oxygen flow rate = 3 L/min) via mask ventilation for 30 min. Pancuronium 0.1-0.15 mg/kg was given thereafter to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained by isoflurane in a minimal oxygen flow of 300 mL/min, with the vaporizer adjusted to deliver 3%-5% concentration. In the FPA group, anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 10-15 microg/kg and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg; and pancuronium 0.1-0.15mg/kg was used for endotracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained by propofol 2-6 mg/kg/hr and fentanyl 1-2 microg/kg/hr, and an incremental bolus of i.v. propofol 20 mg was given if the patient's mean blood pressure (MBP) exceeded 85 mmHg. An inotropic agent was given if the patient's MBP dropped below 65 mmHg or if the patient experienced a decrease in MBP greater than 20% of the preinduction value. The time of extubation, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and inotropic requirements were recorded.
                The patients in the CIA group were extubated earlier than those in the FPA group (281.3 +/- 32.5 min versus 311.3 +/- 38.5 min, respectively; P < 0.05), although there was no statistical difference in the length of stay in the intensive care unit (29.6 +/- 4.8 hr versus 30.1 +/- 7.6 hr, respectively; P = 0.4). The use of inotropic agent in the CIA group was less than in the FPA group (16% vs. 56%, P < 0.01). Dopamine requirement was less in the CIA group than in the FPA group (0.8 +/- 0.3 vs. 3.7 +/- 0.4 microg/kg/min, respectively; P < 0.01).
                These results suggest that CIA, as compared with FPA, provides a significant reduction in the time to extubation after OPCABG surgery with less use of inotropic agents. Studies have shown the value of using fast-track postoperative recovery. Standard procedures (non-fast-track strategies) remain in common use for perioperative care. Few prospective reports exist on the outcome of fast-tracking in Central Europe. The aim of our study was to assess the effect and safety of our own fast-track protocol with regard to the postoperative period after open bowel resection.
                One hundred and five patients with ASA score I-II scheduled for open intestinal resection in the period April 2005-December 2007 were randomly selected for the fast-track group (FT) and non-fast-track group (non-FT). A designed protocol was used in the FT group with the emphasis on an interdisciplinary approach. The control group (non-FT) was treated by standard established procedures. Postoperative pain, rehabilitation, gastrointestinal functions, postoperative complications, and post-op length of stay were recorded.
                Of 105 patients, 103 were statistically analyzed. Patients in the FT group (n=51) and non-FT group (n=52) did not differ in age, surgical diagnosis, or procedure. The fast-track procedure led to significantly better control of postoperative pain and faster restoration of GI functions (bowel movement after 1.3 days vs. 3.1, p<0.001). Food tolerance was significantly better in the FT group and rehabilitation was also faster. Hospital stay was shorter in the FT group - median seven days (95% CI 7.0-7.7) versus ten days (95% CI 9.5-11.3) in non-FT (p<0.001). Postoperative complications within 30 postoperative days were also significantly lower in the FT group (21.6 vs. 48.1%, p=0.003). There were no deaths and no patients were readmitted within 30 days.
                Following the FT protocol helped to reduce frequency of postoperative complications and reduced hospital stay. We conclude that the FT strategy is safe and effective in improving postoperative outcomes. A prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer.
                This study evaluates the use of a multimodal package in colorectal cancer surgery in the context of an RCT.
                Patients for elective resection for colorectal cancer were offered trial entry. Participants were stratified by sex and requirement for a total mesorectal excision and centrally randomized. Multimodal patients received intravenous fluid restriction, unrestricted oral intake with prokinetic agents, early ambulation, and fixed regimen epidural analgesia. Control patients received intravenous fluids to prevent oliguria, restricted oral intake until return of bowel motility, and weaning regimen epidural analgesia. Adherence to both regimens was reinforced using a daily checklist and protocol guidance sheets. Discharge decision was made using pre-agreed criteria. The primary endpoint was postoperative stay, and achievement of independence milestones. Secondary endpoints were postoperative complications, readmission rates, and mortality. Analysis was by intention to treat.
                Seventy patients were recruited. Approximately one fourth underwent TME. Median ages were similar (69.3 vs. 73.0 years). The median stay was significantly reduced in the multimodal group (5 vs. 7 days; P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Patients in the control arm were 2.5 times as likely to require a postoperative stay of more than 5 days. Patients in the multimodal group had less cardiorespiratory and anastomotic complications but more readmissions. There were 2 deaths, both controls.
                This RCT provides level 1b evidence that a multimodal management protocol can significantly reduce postoperative stay following colorectal cancer surgery. Morbidity and mortality are not increased. Improvements in analgesia after major surgery may allow a more rapid recovery and shorter hospital stay. We performed a prospective randomized trial to study the effects of epidural analgesia on the length of hospital stay after coronary artery surgery. The anesthetic technique and postoperative mobilization were altered to facilitate early intensive care discharge and hospital discharge. Fifty patients received high (T1 to T4) thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) with ropivacaine 1% (4-mL bolus, 3-5 mL/h infusion), with fentanyl (100-microg bolus, 15-25 microg/h infusion) and a propofol infusion (6 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)). Another 50 patients (the General Anesthesia group) received fentanyl 15 microg/kg and propofol (5 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)), followed by IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia. The TEA group had lower visual analog scores with coughing postextubation (median, 0 vs 26 mm; P < 0.0001) and were extubated earlier (median hours [interquartile range], 3.2 [2.1-4.6] vs 6.7 [3.3-13.2]; P < 0.0001). More than half of all patients were discharged home on Postoperative Day 4 (24%) or 5 (33%), but there was no difference in the length of stay between the TEA group (median [interquartile range], Day 5 [5-6]) and the General Anesthesia group (median [interquartile range], Day 5 [4-7]). There were no differences in postoperative spirometry or chest radiograph changes or in markers for postoperative myocardial ischemia or infarction. No significant TEA-related complications occurred. In summary, TEA provided better analgesia and allowed earlier tracheal extubation but did not reduce the length of hospital stay after coronary artery surgery.
                We found that epidural analgesia was more effective than IV morphine for cardiac surgery. Epidural anesthesia also allowed earlier weaning from mechanical ventilation, but it did not affect hospital discharge time. To test the hypothesis that epidural anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia decrease the incidence of death and major complications during and after four types of intraabdominal surgical procedures.
                Even though many beneficial aspects of epidural anesthesia have been reported, clinical trials of epidural anesthesia for outcome of surgical patients have shown conflicting results.
                The authors studied 1,021 patients who required anesthesia for one of the intraabdominal aortic, gastric, biliary, or colon operations. They were assigned randomly to receive either general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with parenteral opioids (group 1) or epidural plus light general anesthesia and postoperative epidural morphine (group 2). The patients were monitored for death and major complications during and for 30 days after surgery, as well as for postoperative pain, time of ambulation, and length of hospital stay.
                Overall, there was no significant difference in the incidence of death and major complications between the two groups. For abdominal aortic surgical patients, unlike the other three types of surgical patients, the overall incidence of death and major complications was significantly lower in group 2 patients (22%) than in group 1 patients (37%), stemming from differences in the incidence of new myocardial infarction, stroke, and respiratory failure between the two groups. Overall, group 2 patients received significantly less analgesic medication but had better pain relief than group 1 patients. In group 2 aortic patients, endotracheal intubation time was 13 hours shorter and surgical intensive care stay was 3.5 hours shorter.
                The effect of anesthetic and postoperative analgesic techniques on perioperative outcome varies with the type of operation performed. Overall, epidural analgesia provides better postoperative pain relief. Epidural anesthesia and epidural analgesia improve the overall outcome and shorten the intubation time and intensive care stay in patients undergoing abdominal aortic operations. Recent interest in earlier tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has focused attention on the potential benefits of a propofol-based technique. We randomized 124 patients (34 with poor ventricular function) undergoing CABG surgery to receive either a propofol-based (5 mg.kg-1.h-1 prior to sternotomy, 3 mg.kg-1. h-1 thereafter; n = 58) or enflurane-based (0.2%-1.0%, n = 66) anesthetic. Induction of anesthesia consisted of fentanyl 15 micrograms/kg and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg intravenously in both groups. The enflurane group received an additional bolus of fentanyl 5 micrograms/kg prior to sternotomy and fentanyl 10 micrograms/kg with midazolam 0.1 mg/kg at commencement of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Patients receiving propofol were extubated earlier (median 9.1 h versus 12.3 h, P = 0.006), although there was no difference in time to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge (both 22 h, P = 0.54). Both groups had similar hemodynamic changes throughout (all P > 0.10), as well as metaraminol (P = 0.49) and inotrope requirements (P > 0.10), intraoperative myocardial ischemia (P = 0.12) and perioperative myocardial infarction (P = 0.50). The results of this trial suggest that a propofol-based anesthetic, when compared to an enflurane-based anesthetic requiring additional dosing of fentanyl and midazolam for CPB, can lead to a significant reduction in time to extubation after CABG surgery, without adverse hemodynamic effects, increased risk of myocardial ischemia or infarction. To determine if gastric intramucosal pH (pHi)-guided therapy reduces the number of complications and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) or the hospital after elective repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.
                Prospective, randomized study.
                Surgical intensive care unit (SICU) of a University Hospital.
                Fifty-five consecutive patients randomized to group 1 (pHi-guided therapy) or to group 2 (control).
                Patients of group 1 with a pHi of lower than 7.32 were treated by means of a prospective protocol in order to increase their pHi to 7.32 or more.
                pHi was determined in both groups on admission to the SICU and thereafter at 6-h intervals. In group 2, the treating physicians were blinded for the pHi values. Complications, APACHE II scores, duration of endotracheal intubation, fluid and vasoactive drug treatment, treatment with vasoactive drugs, length of stay in the SICU and in the hospital and hospital mortality were recorded. There were no differences between groups in terms of the incidence of complications. We found no differences in APACHE II scores on admission, the duration of intubation, SICU or hospital stay, or hospital mortality. In the two groups the incidence of pHi values lower than 7.32 on admission to the SICU was comparable (41% and 42% in groups 1 and 2, respectively). Patients with pHi lower than 7.32 had more major complications during SICU stay (p < 0.05), and periods more than 10 h of persistently low pHi values (< 7.32) were associated with a higher incidence of SICU complications (p < 0.01).
                Low pHi values (< 7.32) and their persistence are predictors of major complications. Treatment to elevate low pHi values does not improve postoperative outcome. Based on these data, we cannot recommend the routine use of gastric tonometers for pHi-guided therapy in these patients. Further studies are warranted to determine adequate treatment of low pHi values that results in beneficial effects on the patient's postoperative course and outcome. The aim of this two-center, open, randomized, controlled trial was to evaluate the impact of thoracic epidural anesthesia on early clinical outcomes in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
                Two hundred and twenty-six patients were randomized to either general anesthesia plus epidural (GAE) (n = 109) or general anesthesia only (GA) (n = 117). The primary outcome was length of postoperative hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were: arrhythmia, inotropic support, intubation time, perioperative myocardial infarction, neurologic events, intensive care stay, pain scores, and analgesia requirement.
                Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. One patient died in the GAE group. Median postoperative stay was significantly reduced in the GAE, compared with the GA, group (5 days, interquartile range [5-6] vs. 6 days, interquartile range [5-7], hazard ratio = 1.39, 95% CI [1.06-1.82]; P = 0.017). The incidence of arrhythmias and the median intubation time were both significantly lower in the GAE, compared with the GA, group (odds ratio = 0.41, 95% CI [0.22-0.78], P = 0.006 and hazard ratio = 1.73, 95% CI [1.31-2.27], P < 0.001, respectively). Patients in the GAE group were more likely to need vasoconstrictors intraoperatively than in the GA group (odds ratio = 2.50, 95% CI [1.22-5.12]; P = 0.012). The GAE, compared with GA, group reported significantly lower levels of impairment for all pain domains and reduced morphine usage (odds ratio = 0.07, 95% CI [0.03-0.17]; P < 0.001).
                In patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery, the addition of thoracic epidural to general anesthesia significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative arrhythmias and improves pain control and overall quality of recovery, allowing earlier extubation and hospital discharge. To determine whether preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery improves outcome after major elective surgery, and to determine whether the inotropes, adrenaline and dopexamine, used to enhance oxygen delivery influence outcome.
                Randomised controlled trial with double blinding between inotrope groups. Setting: York District Hospital, England.
                138 patients undergoing major elective surgery who were at risk of developing postoperative complications either because of the surgery or the presence of coexistent medical conditions. Interventions: Patients were randomised into three groups. Two groups received invasive haemodynamic monitoring, fluid, and either adrenaline or dopexamine to increase oxygen delivery. Inotropic support was continued during surgery and for at least 12 hours afterwards. The third group (control) received routine perioperative care.
                Hospital mortality and morbidity.
                Overall, 3/92 (3%) preoptimised patients died compared with 8/46 controls (17%) (P=0.007). There were no differences in mortality between the treatment groups, but 14/46 (30%) patients in the dopexamine group developed complications compared with 24/46 (52%) patients in the adrenaline group (difference 22%, 95% confidence interval 2% to 41%) and 28 patients (61%) in the control group (31%, 11% to 50%). The use of dopexamine was associated with a decreased length of stay in hospital.
                Routine preoperative optimisation of patients undergoing major elective surgery would be a significant and cost effective improvement in perioperative care. Propofol anesthesia based on target-controlled-infusion (TCI) has been shown to be superior to a manually-controlled-infusion (MCI) technique. A new optimal-target-controlled-infusion (OTCI) technique enables an individual plasma-targeted adjustment by including the concentration in the effect-compartment. This study compared practicability and costs of the new system with a conventional MCI-based propofol anesthesia regimen.
                In a prospective study, 50 patients scheduled for elective surgery of nose or nasal sinuses were randomly enrolled to receive BIS-controlled anaesthesia (level: 40-55) using either OTCI (n = 25) or MCI (n = 25). Hemodynamics, extubation times and time of awaking, rate and quality of propofol adjustment, total drug requirements, costs, postanaesthetic care unit (PACU) stay, Aldrete and pain scores, and adverse effects (postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), shivering) were recorded.
                Demographics, hemodynamics, and perioperative data including extubation times were comparable for both study groups. Propofol consumption was similar within the first 60 min for both groups, thereafter, significantly less propofol in the OTCI group (5.03 mg/kg/h) than the MCI group (5.79 mg/kg/h) was used. Costs for propofol was significantly reduced with OTCI (0.2 vs. 0.23 Cent/anaesthesia minute/kg), the administration of other anaesthetics (fentanyl, remifentanil, cis-atracurium) did not differ between the groups. The number of infusion adjustments to BIS values were not significantly different.
                The new OTCI-system is a safe and easily controllable technique. The obvious advantage of this infusion system appears to be a reduction in propofol consumption and direct drug costs for anaesthesia lasting longer than 60 min. Electroencephalographic monitors of anaesthetic depth are reported to assist anaesthetists in reducing recovery times. We explored the effect of bispectral index (BIS) monitoring on recovery times in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of 2,463 patients at high risk of awareness. Patients were randomized to BIS-guided anaesthesia or routine care. In the BIS group, anaesthesia was adjusted to maintain a BIS value of 40-60 from the commencement of laryngoscopy to the start of wound closure, and 55-70 during wound closure. In the routine care group, anaesthesia was adjusted according to traditional clinical signs. In multivariate models, BIS monitoring, female gender, lower American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status and shorter duration of anaesthesia predicted faster time to eye-opening after anaesthesia, and faster time to post-anaesthesia care unit discharge. BIS monitoring did not affect times to tracheal extubation among patients admitted to the intensive care unit. We conclude that BIS monitoring has statistically significant, but clinically modest, effects on recovery times in high risk surgical patients. The routine use of cholinesterase inhibitors to antagonize residual neuromuscular block may be associated with increased postoperative emesis. Rapid spontaneous recovery from mivacurium may obviate the need for these drugs. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 113 healthy children who had received mivacurium as part of a standardized anesthetic regimen, we compared the incidence of postoperative complications after spontaneous recovery and after the use of neostigmine-glycopyrrolate or edrophonium-atropine. The anesthetic regimen consisted of halothane, nitrous oxide, fentanyl, 2 micrograms/kg intravenous (i.v.), mivacurium in an initial dose of 0.2 mg/kg, followed by an infusion, adjusted to maintain > or = 1 evoked contraction response to a supramaximum train-of-four stimulus. At the end of the procedure, patients received by random assignment one of three drug combinations: 1) neostigmine 70 micrograms/kg + glycopyrrolate 10 micrograms/kg, i.v., 2) edrophonium 1 mg/kg + atropine 10 micrograms/kg, i.v., and 3) saline. The trachea was extubated when evoked responses to peripheral nerve stimulation and clinical signs of adequate neuromuscular recovery were present. Postoperative pain was treated with morphine and emesis with metoclopramide. There were no significant differences between the three groups with respect to age, surgery, intraoperative fentanyl, and mivacurium use, time from the end of surgery to tracheal extubation, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival and discharge, or in postoperative oxygen saturation values and analgesic requirements. Compared to the placebo group, emesis occurred more often in the PACU in patients receiving the neostigmine-glycopyrrolate combination, but not after edrophonium-atropine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The use of cerebral monitoring may improve the ability of anesthesiologists to titrate anesthetic drugs. However, there is controversy regarding the impact of the alleged anesthetic-sparing effects of cerebral monitoring on the recovery process and patient outcome. We designed this prospective double-blinded, sham-controlled study to evaluate the impact of intraoperative monitoring with the electroencephalogram bispectral index (BIS) or auditory evoked potential (AEP) device on the usage of desflurane and the time to discharge from the recovery room, as well as on patient satisfaction with their anesthetic experience and recovery. Ninety healthy patients undergoing laparoscopic general surgery procedures using a standardized anesthetic technique were randomly assigned to one of three monitoring groups: standard clinical practice (control), BIS-guided, or AEP-guided. Both the BIS and AEP monitors were connected to all patients before induction of general anesthesia. In the control group, the anesthesiologists were not permitted to observe the BIS or AEP index values during the intraoperative period. In the BIS-guided group, the volatile anesthetic was titrated to maintain a BIS value in the range of 45-55. In the AEP-guided group, the targeted AEP index range was 15-20. The BIS and AEP indices, as well as end-tidal desflurane concentration, were recorded at 3-5 min intervals. Recovery times to awakening, tracheal extubation, fast-track score >or=12, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge criteria were recorded at 1-10 min intervals. In addition, patient satisfaction with anesthesia and quality of recovery were evaluated on 100- and 18-point scales, respectively, at 24 h after surgery. The AEP- and BIS-guided groups were administered significantly smaller average end-tidal desflurane concentrations than the control group (3.8 +/- 0.9 and 3.9 +/- 0.6 versus 4.7 +/- 1.7, respectively) (P < 0.01). Although the emergence times to eye opening, tracheal extubation, and obeying commands were consistently shorter in the AEP and BIS groups (6 +/- 4 and 6 +/- 5 versus 8 +/- 8 min; 6 +/- 5 and 6 +/- 4 versus 11 +/- 10 min; and 8 +/- 4 and 7 +/- 4 versus 12 +/- 9 min, respectively), only the extubation times were significantly different from the control group (P < 0.05). More importantly, the length of the PACU stay was significantly shorter in both the AEP- and BIS-guided groups (79 +/- 43 and 80 +/- 47 versus 108 +/- 58 min, respectively) (P < 0.05). The patients' quality of recovery was also significantly higher in the two monitored groups (15 +/- 2 versus 13 +/- 3 in the control group, P < 0.05). We concluded that cerebral monitoring with either the BIS or AEP devices reduced the maintenance anesthetic (desflurane) requirement, resulting in a shorter length of stay in the PACU and improved quality of recovery after laparoscopic surgery. However, there were no significant outcome differences between the two cerebral monitored groups.
                Compared with standard monitoring practices, use of an auditory evoked potential or bispectral index monitor to titrate the volatile anesthetic led to a significant reduction in the anesthetic requirement. The anesthetic-sparing effect of cerebral monitoring resulted in a shorter postanesthesia care unit stay and improved quality of recovery from the patient's perspective. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that after thoracic surgery, the supplementation of a low-dose thoracic epidural (ED) bupivacaine (0.125%) infusion by intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine decreases analgesic requirement without causing respiratory depression. The primary endpoint was the need for additional ED bupivacaine administered through patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). Secondary endpoints included the requirement for supplemental opioids and the impact of dexmedetomidine on CO2 retention.
                A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.
                A major US tertiary care university hospital.
                Twenty-eight patients scheduled to undergo elective thoracotomy for wedge resection, lobectomy, or pneumonectomy.
                On intensive care unit arrival, the thoracic ED catheter was loaded with 0.125% bupivacaine to a T4 sensory level and a continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine without opioid was commenced at 4 mL/h. Patients were then randomized into 1 of 2 groups. The dexmedetomidine group received an IV loading dose of dexmedetomidine of 0.5 microg/kg over 20 minutes, followed by continuous IV infusion at 0.4 microg/kg/h. The placebo group received IV saline at the same calculated loading and infusion rates by volume. If necessary, supplemental analgesia (increased ED rate, ED fentanyl, ketorolac [IV]) was provided to ensure a visual analog scale (VAS) score of < or =3.
                The analgesic effect was monitored by the VAS, and the requirement for PCEA dosing and additional analgesics was recorded. Heart rate, blood pressure, and blood gases were also monitored.
                There was no significant difference in PCEA use and VAS score between the 2 groups, but requirement for supplemental ED fentanyl analgesia was significantly greater in the placebo group (66.1 +/- 95.6 v 5.3 +/- 17.1 microg, p = 0.039). Mean PaCO2 was also significantly greater in the placebo group (40.3 +/- 4.1 v 43.9 +/- 4.3 mmHg, p = 0.04). Patients in the dexmedetomidine group exhibited significantly decreased heart rate (1 patient required and responded to atropine) and blood pressure (4 patients required and readily responded to IV fluid) compared with the placebo group.
                The authors conclude that in postthoracotomy patients, IV dexmedetomidine is a potentially effective analgesic adjunct to thoracic ED bupivacaine infusion and may decrease the requirement for opioids and potential for respiratory depression. The hemodynamic and respiratory effects of high dose fentanyl anesthesia and those of isoflurane anesthesia with combined use of low dose fentanyl were compared in 40 patients undergoing open heart surgery. Twenty patients (Group Fen) were anesthetized with high dose fentanyl (about 100 micrograms.kg-1), other twenty patients (Group Iso) were anesthetized with isoflurane (inhalation of 1.0-2.0%) combined with low dose fentanyl (about 8 micrograms.kg-1). Between the two groups, there were no significant differences in HR, CI, SVI, MPAP, MRAP, PVRI, RVCWI, LVSWI, DO2I, SvO2, and P/F ratio. In group Iso, there were significant decreases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) at the time of sternotomy and before the cardiopulmonary bypass. In group Fen, a significant increase in VO2I occurred at the time of sternotomy. In ICU, catecholamine concentrations were significantly lower, and the duration of its use was significantly shorter in group Iso. Group Iso required significantly less time to awakening and to extubating. Therefore, group Iso shortened the length of ICU stays. In conclusion, isoflurane with combined use of low dose fentanyl anesthesia is an acceptable method of anesthesia for open heart surgery.
The use of low-dose opioid based general anaesthesia and time-directed protocols for fast-track interventions have similar risks of mortality and major postoperative complications to conventional (not fast-track) care, and therefore appear to be safe in patients considered to be at low to moderate risk. These fast-track interventions reduced the time to extubation and shortened the length of stay in the intensive care unit, but did not reduce the length of stay in the hospital.