Randomized outcome trial of human milk fortification and developmental outcome in preterm infants. Growth, efficacy, and safety of feeding an iron-fortified human milk fortifier. Improved bone mineralization and growth in premature infants fed fortified own mother's milk. Growth, biochemical status, and mineral metabolism in very-low-birth-weight infants receiving fortified preterm human milk. Supplementation with human milk protein improves growth of small premature infants fed human milk. Changes in growth and metabolism in very low birthweight infants fed with fortified breast milk. School-milk intervention trial enhances growth and bone mineral accretion in Chinese girls aged 10-12 years in Beijing. Growth and nutrient intakes of human milk-fed preterm infants provided with extra energy and nutrients after hospital discharge. Milk fortified with iron or iron supplementation to improve nutritional status of pregnant women: an intervention trial from rural Vietnam. Skeletal site-dependent response of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound parameters following a 12-month dietary intervention using dairy products fortified with calcium and vitamin D: the Postmenopausal Health Study. Calcium- and vitamin D3-fortified milk reduces bone loss at clinically relevant skeletal sites in older men: a 2-year randomized controlled trial. Growth, nutrient retention, and metabolic response of low-birth-weight infants fed supplemented and unsupplemented preterm human milk.
Despite potential benefits, human milk may fail to meet preterm infants' nutrient requirements. We tested the hypothesis that fortified breast milk, fed alone or with preterm formula, would improve neurodevelopment and growth at 18-mo follow-up without adverse short-term clinical or biochemical consequences. Two hundred seventy-five preterm infants from two medical centers (birth weight < 1850 g; mean gestation 29.8 +/- 2.7 wk) whose mothers chose to provide breast milk were randomly assigned to receive for a mean of 39 d a multinutrient fortifier or control supplement containing phosphate and vitamins. Breast milk comprised 47.6% and 46.4% of enteral intake in fortified and control groups, respectively; preterm formula supplements were used when insufficient breast milk was available. Overall, there were no significant growth advantages with fortification; although, when breast milk exceeded 50% of intake, fortification promoted faster weight gain (an advantage of 1.6 g.kg-1.d-1; 95% CI: 0.1, 3.1; P < 0.05). Compared with control infants, the fortified group showed 1) higher plasma urea from week 2 (P = 0.04), 2) higher plasma calcium (mean 2.34 +/- 0.01 compared with 2.27 +/- 0.02 mmol/L; P = 0.003), 3) a greater rise in alkaline phosphatase by week 6 (P = 0.04), 4) more clinical infections (suspected plus proven; 43% compared with 31%, P = 0.04), 5) a nonsignificantly increased incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (5.8% compared with 2.2%, P = 0.12), and 6) higher white cell and platelet counts. Developmental scores at 18 mo were slightly but not significantly higher in the fortified group. This study confirmed that breast milk fortifiers can improve short-term growth (when breast milk intakes are high); but beneficial effects on long-term development remained unproven. Future research is required to evaluate potential adverse consequences and explore more optimal fortification strategies. Survival rates for preterm infants who weigh between 501 and 1500 g at birth have continued to improve over time. In response to this continuing decrease in birth weight of surviving preterm infants, Enfamil Human Milk Fortifier has recently been reformulated to meet the nutritional requirements of these smaller, more rapidly growing infants. It now provides an increased protein level of 1.1 g/58 kJ, a decreased carbohydrate level of 0.2 g/58 kJ, and a combined linoleic and alpha-linolenic fatty acid content of 157 mg/58 kJ. As these very small preterm infants have an increased requirement for dietary iron, the fortifier has been supplemented with 1.44 mg/58 kJ of iron, an amount of iron similar to that provided in a typical iron-fortified term infant formula. An iron-fortified product obviates the need for administration of an iron supplement, a hyperosmolar-inducing intervention. The purpose of this prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study was to evaluate growth, safety, and efficacy in a population of very low birth weight (VLBW) preterm infants who received human milk fortified with either the reformulated iron-fortified powdered human milk fortifier test product (HMF-T) or a powdered commercially available human milk fortifier control product (HMF-C).
                Infants who weighed < or =1500 g, had a gestational age < or =33 weeks postmenstrual age, and had an enteral intake of at least 100 mL/kg per day of unfortified human milk were stratified by gender and birth weight and randomized to receive HMF-T or HMF-C product from study day 1 to study day 28, hospital discharge, or the termination of human milk feedings, whichever came first. Unless medically indicated, investigators were not to administer iron supplements from study days 1 to 14. Infants were assessed serially for growth; enteral and parenteral intake; serum chemistry and hematologic values; clinical histories, including the administration of blood transfusions; feeding tolerance; respiratory outcomes; and morbidities, including adverse events.
                Of the 181 participating infants in this study, 96 received HMF-T and 85 received HMF-C. At randomization, there were no significant differences in infant characteristics between the fortifier groups. The percentage of participants who remained in the study for 28 days was similar between fortifier groups (57% HMF-T, 46% HMF-C). For both fortifier groups, the most frequent reasons for discontinuing the study before study day 28 were unavailability of human milk and hospital discharge. Rate of weight gain was similar between the fortifier groups (17.5 +/- 0.53 g/kg per day for HMF-T and 17.3 +/- 0.59 g/kg per day for HMF-C). Mean achieved weight, length, and head circumference were comparable between groups across the 28-day study period. Total protein intake from enteral and parenteral nutrition was significantly greater for the HMF-T fortifier group; however, this difference did not result in any difference in growth between the 2 fortifier groups. An analysis of the growth and energy intake data of a subset of the intent-to-treat population who adhered more strictly to the study feeding protocol yielded results similar to those seen for the intent-to-treat population. There were no clinically significant differences in the results of laboratory studies between the groups at study days 0, 14, and 28. Anemia of prematurity was prevalent in both study groups; by study day 28, median hematocrit levels were 27.0% (interquartile range [IQR]: 24.0%-29.6%) for the HMF-T group and 26.0% (IQR: 24.0%-31.0%) for the HMF-C group. Median ferritin levels were 77.0 ng/mL (IQR: 37-155 ng/ml) for HMF-T and 92.0 ng/mL (IQR: 33-110 ng/mL) for HMF-C. There were no significant differences between the study fortifier groups in regard to the receipt of medically indicated iron supplements on or before study day 14 or in the administration of blood transfusions before study day 0 or from study days 0 through 14. However, from study day 15 to study day 28, fewer HMF-T infants (n = 12) required a blood transfusion than did HMF-C infants (n = 20). Although the higher levels of iron in the HMF-T fortifier (1.44 mg vs 0.35 mg for HMF-C per 4 packets of powdered fortifier) did not prevent anemia per se, it did reduce the frequency of one of the most serious outcomes of anemia: the need for a blood transfusion. There was no statistically significant difference between fortifier groups in regard to feeding tolerance. Rates of suspected sepsis (26% HMF-T vs 31% HMF-C) and confirmed sepsis (5% HMF-T, 7% HMF-C) were low as were the rates of suspected necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC; 6% HMF-T and 5% HMF-C) and confirmed Bell's stage 2 or more NEC (1% HMF-T and 1% HMF-C). There were no statistically significant differences between the study fortifier groups in regard to the incidence of confirmed and suspected sepsis and NEC.
                Both human milk fortifiers studied are safe, are well tolerated, and facilitate comparable good growth; however, using the iron-fortified product may reduce the need for blood transfusions in VLBW infants. The similar low rates of suspected and confirmed NEC and sepsis seen in both fortifier groups in this study refutes the premise that the inclusion of iron in fortifiers will increase the incidence of sepsis and NEC. Indeed, the incidence for NEC and sepsis for both groups in this study was lower than is reported for VLBW infants and similar to that seen for infants who are fed human milk. "Preterm" human milk fortified with protein (0.85 gm/dL), calcium (90 mg/dL), and phosphorus (45 mg/dL) was compared with unfortified preterm human milk as a feeding for low birth weight infants. Additionally, a special formula for low birth weight infants (Similac Special Care (SC), 20 cal/oz), was compared with a standard 20 cal/oz formula (Similac). Bone mineral content (BMC), as measured by photon absorptiometry, improved in the study groups fed fortified human milk and Similac SC formula during the first 6 weeks of full oral feedings. Even though the intakes of calcium in the groups fed fortified human milk and Similac SC formula approached the intrauterine requirement for Ca during the third trimester of pregnancy (150 mg/kg/d), the values for BMC in these two groups (37 to 39 mg/cm) at the completion of the study were still considerably less than the intrauterine values for radial BMC at 36 to 37 weeks gestational age (72.6 +/- 14.1 mg/cm). Furthermore, the relative phosphorus deficiency (as determined by increased urinary Ca excretion and increased renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate) in the human milk groups occurred with or without supplements of Ca and P. Rate of weight gain in the fortified human milk group was greater than that of the unfortified human milk group and was comparable to that of infants fed Similac SC formula. Rate of weight gain for the unfortified human milk group was similar to that of infants fed Similac formula containing 20 cal/oz. However, none of the four feeding groups exceeded the 50th percentile for weight at the time of discharge (36 to 37 weeks postconceptional age). The results suggest that fortifying preterm human milk with Ca, P, and protein for low birth weight infants will improve bone mineralization and rate of growth to levels comparable to those achieved with a special formula containing high amounts of protein, Ca, and P. We compared the growth, biochemical status, and mineral status of 30 very-low-birth-weight infants randomly assigned to receive preterm human milk (Group I, 10 infants) from their own mothers, fortified preterm human milk (Group II, 8 infants), or a high-caloric-density premature formula (Group III, 12 infants). Added to the infant's own mother's milk, a human milk fortifier at full strength provided additional protein (60:40 whey/casein, 0.7 g/dl), calories (4 kcal/oz), and minerals. Volume of intake, feeding tolerance, and complications were similar in the three groups. Infants receiving fortified preterm human milk showed growth, biochemical status, and mineral status similar to those receiving high-caloric-density formula, but infants receiving fortified preterm human milk grew faster (12.0 +/- 3.2 vs. 8.9 +/- 1.1 days/300 g, p less than 0.05), had higher serum protein (4.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 4.2 +/- 0.2 g/dl, p less than 0.05), and tended to have better mineral status (higher serum calcium, lower alkaline phosphatase, and higher serum phosphorus, none individually significant) than infants receiving preterm human milk alone. This study supports previous observations that fortified preterm human milk provides nutritional advantages for very-low-birth-weight infants. We investigated the influence of human milk protein and medium-chain triglyceride supplementations of human milk feedings on the growth of very low birth weight infants during their first weeks of life. A group of 44 preterm infants with birth weights of less than 1,520 g and a mean gestational age of 30.3 weeks was randomly divided into four groups to receive plain human milk or human milk supplemented with human milk protein (0.9 g/dL), with medium-chain triglycerides (1 g/dL), or with both. The medium-chain triglyceride oil supplementation did not influence the growth of these infants. The infants given supplementary protein gained weight faster during weeks 4 to 6 than those without (18.5 +/- 0.7 v 15.1 +/- 0.6 g/kg/d; mean +/- SEM; P = .001). After 4 weeks of age the infants given supplementary protein had a mean weight gain equal to the mean intrauterine rate, in contrast to the infants of the other groups, who grew more slowly until age 6 weeks. Furthermore, we found a correlation between serum albumin concentration and weight gain during the seventh week of life (P = .018). The length growth velocity for the infants with protein supplementation was 0.99 +/- 0.06 cm/wk (mean +/- SEM) and for those without 0.83 +/- 0.05 cm/wk (P = .043). There was no difference in growth of head circumference between the groups. We conclude that human milk protein supplementation improves the growth of small premature infants fed human milk, and that the protein concentration of bank milk is insufficient for their adequate growth. Human milk is often inadequate nutritionally for preterm infants. We investigated the effect of adding a commercially prepared milk fortifier to human (maternal or bank) milk and measured changes in lower leg length velocity (LLLvel) using knemometry, weight gain and biochemical indices of nutrition. Babies were allocated to one of three feed groups, in a semi-randomized fashion, to receive human milk alone (group I), fortified human milk (group II) or a preterm formula (group III). The birthweights (median and R) and birth gestations (median and R) of the three groups were as follows: group I 1099 g (654-1248 g) and 28 wk (26-32 wk); group II 838 g (742-1340g) and 31 wk (28-36); group III 1136g (624-1552g) and 32 wk (27-36 wk). All babies who received fortified milk either showed significant (p = 0.0004) acceleration in LLLvel during the period studied, or maintained their pre-study period velocity. This increase in LLLvel was comparable to that achieved by a group of babies given a standard preterm infant formula (p < 0.001). By comparison, the control group's change in LLLvel was more modest (p = 0.04). Babies who received human milk with the fortifier added had the lowest serum levels of alkaline phosphatase at the end of the study period when compared to the other two groups. Other biochemical indices were similar in the three feed groups. No adverse clinical events were encountered which could be attributed to the use of the breast milk fortifier. A 2-year milk intervention trial was carried out with 757 girls, aged 10 years, from nine primary schools in Beijing (April 1999 - March 2001). Schools were randomised into three groups: group 1, 238 girls consumed a carton of 330 ml milk fortified with Ca on school days over the study period; group 2, 260 girls received the same quantity of milk additionally fortified with 5 or 8 microg cholecalciferol; group 3, 259 control girls. Anthropometric and bone mineralisation measurements, as well as dietary, health and physical-activity data, were collected at baseline and after 12 and 24 months of the trial. Over the 2-year period the consumption of this milk, with or without added cholecalciferol, led to significant increases in the changes in height (> or =0.6 %), sitting height (> or =0.8 %), body weight (> or 2.9 %), and (size-adjusted) total-body bone mineral content (> or =1.2 %) and bone mineral density (> or =3.2 %). Those subjects receiving additional cholecalciferol compared with those receiving the milk without added 25-hydoxycholecalciferol had significantly greater increases in the change in (size-adjusted) total-body bone mineral content (2.4 v. 1.2 %) and bone mineral density (5.5 v. 3.2 %). The milk fortified with cholecalciferol significantly improved vitamin D status at the end of the trial compared with the milk alone or control groups. It is concluded that an increase in milk consumption, e.g. by means of school milk programmes, would improve bone growth during adolescence, particularly when Ca intake and vitamin D status are low. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether mixing a multinutrient fortifier to approximately one half of the human milk fed each day for a finite period after discharge improves the nutrient intake and growth of predominantly human milk-fed low birth weight infants. We also assessed the impact of this intervention on the exclusivity of human milk feeding.
                Human milk-fed (> or = 80% feeding per day) low birth weight (750-1800 g) infants (n = 39) were randomly assigned at hospital discharge to either a control or an intervention group. Infants in the control group were discharged from the hospital on unfortified human milk. Nutrient enrichment of human milk in the intervention group was achieved by mixing approximately one half of the human milk provided each day with a powdered multinutrient human milk fortifier for 12 weeks after discharge. Milk with added nutrients was estimated to contain approximately 80 kcal (336 kJ) and 2.2 g protein/100 mL plus other nutrients. Intensive lactation support was provided to both groups.
                Infants in the intervention group were longer during the study period, and those born < or = 1250 g had larger head circumferences than infants in the control group. There was a trend toward infants in the intervention group to be heavier at the end of the intervention compared with those in the control group. Mean protein, zinc, calcium, phosphorus, and vitamins A and D intakes were higher in the intervention group.
                Results from this study suggest that adding a multinutrient fortifier to approximately one half of the milk provided to predominantly human milk-fed infants for 12 weeks after hospital discharge may be an effective strategy in addressing early discharge nutrient deficits and poor growth without unduly influencing human milk feeding when intensive lactation support is provided. Anemia is still the major nutritional problem among pregnant women in Southeast Asia. The objective of this study was to measure hemoglobin status and reduction of underweight in a group of pregnant women who received iron-fortified or nonfortified milk, and another group who received iron supplements (tablets) or placebo. The 44 women in the iron-fortified milk group received 15 mg of iron per day per 400 ml of milk, and 41 women received placebo. The 40 women in the iron supplement group received 60 mg of iron per day, and 43 women received nonfortified milk. During this intervention trial, all women were supervised from the 14th to the 18th week of gestation until delivery. Blood was sampled at 0, 5, 10, and 16 weeks of intervention. After the 16th week of intervention, the changes in hemoglobin (deltaHb) concentrations in both treatment groups (the iron-fortified milk and the iron tablet groups) were not significantly different (deltaHb: -0.5+/-0.9 and -0.3+/-0.9 g/L, respectively), but the changes were significantly greater in the nonfortified milk and placebo groups (deltaHb: -1.2+/-0.9 and -1.1+/-0.8 g/L, respectively; p < .01). The change in transferrin saturation (deltaTS) in the iron-fortified milk group (deltaTS: 3.4+/-12.9%) was greater than that in the placebo and nonfortified milk groups (deltaTS: -10.1+/-9.8% and -11.6+/-10.7 %, respectively) (p < .01). The weight gain of the subjects during intervention did not differ significantly in the fortified and nonfortified milk groups (delta weight: 5.0+/-2.0 and 5.8+/-2.1 kg, respectively), but was higher than in the iron tablet group (delta weight: 4.6+/-3.1 kg; p < .05) and the placebo group (delta weight: 3.8+/-2.5 kg; p < .001). Iron supplementation and fortification were seen to be effective in promoting weight gain in pregnant Vietnamese women. For women who are underweight, the administration of iron-fortified milk has additional benefits to those of supplementation, most likely due to additional energy and nutrient inputs. The aim of the current study was to examine whether calcium supplementation could prevent bone loss in postmenopausal women or more favourable outcomes could be obtained via the consumption of dairy products fortified with calcium and vitamin D3. For this purpose changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at different skeletal sites, assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, as well as in quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters of the calcaneus over 12 months were estimated. A population of 101 postmenopausal women (55-65 years old) was randomized into a dairy group (DG: n 39), receiving approximately 1200 mg calcium/d and 7.5 microg vitamin D3/d through fortified dairy products; a calcium-supplemented group (CaG: n 26) provided with a calcium supplement of 600 mg/d; and a control group (CG: n 36). Over the intervention period the DG was found to have more favourable changes in pelvis (P=0.040), total spine (P<0.001) and total body BMD (P<0.001) than the other groups. A significant increase was also observed for DG in lumbar spine BMD (2.0%; 95% CI 0.5, 3.5) although it did not differentiate significantly compared to the other groups. No significant differences were observed with respect to the changes in QUS parameters. The current study revealed that recommended intakes of vitamin D3 and calcium via fortified dairy products for 12 months can induce favourable changes in pelvis, total spine and total body BMD in postmenopausal women but not in QUS parameters. No such favourable changes were observed via supplementation of calcium alone. In this 2-year randomized controlled study of 167 men >50 years of age, supplementation with calcium-vitamin D3-fortified milk providing an additional 1000 mg of calcium and 800 IU of vitamin D3 per day was effective for suppressing PTH and stopping or slowing bone loss at several clinically important skeletal sites at risk for fracture.
                Low dietary calcium and inadequate vitamin D stores have long been implicated in age-related bone loss and osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of calcium and vitamin D3 fortified milk on BMD in community living men >50 years of age.
                This was a 2-year randomized controlled study in which 167 men (mean age +/- SD, 61.9 +/- 7.7 years) were assigned to receive either 400 ml/day of reduced fat ( approximately 1%) ultra-high temperature (UHT) milk containing 1000 mg of calcium plus 800 IU of vitamin D3 or to a control group receiving no additional milk. Primary endpoints were changes in BMD, serum 25(OH)D, and PTH.
                One hundred forty-nine men completed the study. Baseline characteristics between the groups were not different; mean dietary calcium and serum 25(OH)D levels were 941 +/- 387 mg/day and 77 +/- 23 nM, respectively. After 2 years, the mean percent change in BMD was 0.9-1.6% less in the milk supplementation compared with control group at the femoral neck, total hip, and ultradistal radius (range, p < 0.08 to p < 0.001 after adjusting for covariates). There was a greater increase in lumbar spine BMD in the milk supplementation group after 12 and 18 months (0.8-1.0%, p < or = 0.05), but the between-group difference was not significant after 2 years (0.7%; 95% CI, -0.3, 1.7). Serum 25(OH)D increased and PTH decreased in the milk supplementation relative to control group after the first year (31% and -18%, respectively; both p < 0.001), and these differences remained after 2 years. Body weight remained unchanged in both groups at the completion of the study.
                Supplementing the diet of men >50 years of age with reduced-fat calcium- and vitamin D3-enriched milk may represent a simple, nutritionally sound and cost-effective strategy to reduce age-related bone loss at several skeletal sites at risk for fracture in the elderly. Growth, nutrient retention, and metabolic response of low-birth-weight infants fed human milk provided by their mother; this milk supplemented with bovine milk protein, calcium, phosphorus, and sodium; or pasteurized term human milk with the same supplement were monitored from the time desired intake was tolerated until weight reached 2200 g. The supplement resulted in greater rates of weight gain (20.5 +/- 2.3 vs 16.4 +/- 2.2 g.kg-1.d-1) and nitrogen retention (353 +/- 76 vs 270 +/- 53 mg.kg-1.d-1), increase in plasma transthyretin (TTR) concentration (7 +/- 16 vs -3 +/- 9 mg.L-1.wk-1), a higher mean plasma albumin concentration (34 +/- 3 vs 32 +/- 4 g/L), and a higher plasma TTR concentration at discharge (100 +/- 22 vs 75 +/- 24 mg/L). All these variables correlated significantly with total nitrogen intake, suggesting that the differences are attributable to the protein content of the supplement. The supplement also resulted in greater rates of calcium and phosphorus accretion but the plasma alkaline phosphatase activity of the supplemented vs the unsupplemented groups did not differ.
Multicomponent fortification of human milk is associated with short-term improvements in weight gain, linear and head growth. Despite the absence of evidence of long-term benefit and insufficient evidence to be reassured that there are no deleterious effects, it is unlikely that further studies evaluating fortification of human milk versus no supplementation will be performed. Further research should be directed toward comparisons between different proprietary preparations and evaluating both short-term and long-term outcomes in search of the "optimal" composition of fortifiers.