Antifibrinolytic treatment in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. STAR Study Group. Benefits and risks of antifibrinolytic therapy in the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. A double-blind placebo-controlled study. Antifibrinolytic treatment in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Antifibrinolysis with tranexamic acid in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a consecutive controlled clinical trial. Prediction and prevention of delayed ischemic dysfunction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and early operation. Randomized controlled trial of acetylsalicylic acid in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: the MASH Study. Dipyridamole and postoperative ischemic deficits in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Randomized pilot trial of postoperative aspirin in subarachnoid hemorrhage.
To investigate whether antifibrinolytics in combination with treatment to prevent cerebral ischemia improve outcome in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in whom occlusion of the aneurysm is delayed.
                Antifibrinolytic treatment reduces rebleeding, but outcome does not improve because of a concurrent increase in the occurrence of cerebral ischemia. Because treatment of ischemia has improved, antifibrinolytics might now have a beneficial effect.
                A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial was performed. Randomized were 462 patients (229 received tranexamic acid, 233 placebo) admitted within 96 hours after onset of SAH, in whom treatment of the aneurysm was delayed beyond 48 hours after SAH. All patients were treated with calcium antagonists and hypervolemia. At 3 months, outcome was assessed with the Glasgow Outcome Scale. The occurrence of cerebral ischemia and other complications were recorded, and the effects of treatment were related to the clinical condition on admission.
                Antifibrinolytic treatment had no beneficial effect on outcome (relative risk [RR], 1.10; 95% confidence limits [CL], 0.91-1.34). Antifibrinolytics significantly reduced the occurrence of rebleeding (RR, 0.58; 95% CL, 0.42-0.80); the occurrence of ischemic and other complications was the same in the two groups.
                Antifibrinolytic treatment combined with treatment to prevent cerebral ischemia does not improve outcome. One hundred patients with a verified subarachnoid haemorrhage were studied in a double blind, placebo-controlled trial at a single centre to determine the value and relative risks of tranexamic acid (TXA) in the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. The incidence of recurrent haemorrhage between active and placebo groups was identical (12%) and the mortality from recurrent haemorrhage was 7% and 5%, respectively. The overall incidence of cerebral infarction before surgery, at discharge and at 6 months follow-up was greater in the TXA group (27%) than in the control group (11%). Post-operative cerebral ischaemia was significantly more frequent in the active, 18 of 29 as compared to 6 of 32 patients, in the placebo group. In a fifth of the patients in whom cerebral blood flow was estimated there was a significant reduction of cerebral blood flow (CBF) on the side of the ruptured aneurysm in the TXA treated group. It is suggested that this may be the cause of the increased incidence of cerebral ischaemia in this group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of cerebral vasospasm, hydrocephalus, visual disturbances and gastrointestinal disturbances. More fatalities were encountered from ischaemia and recurrent haemorrhage in the TXA group but these differences did not reach statistical significance at the 5% level. Given that disability was due to either vasospasm or recurrent haemorrhage than a patient under TXA treatment was significantly more likely to have disability due to vasospasm (p less than 0.04); the reverse was true for the placebo patient (p less than 0.05). We enrolled 479 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether treatment with the antifibrinolytic agent tranexamic acid improves outcome by preventing rebleeding. At three months there was no statistical difference between the outcomes in the tranexamic acid group and the control group. Of the 173 patients who died, 84 had received tranexamic acid and 89 placebo (95 per cent confidence interval for the difference in mortality rate, -6 to 11 per cent). Similarly, when analysis was restricted to patients with an angiographically demonstrated aneurysm, there was no significant difference between the groups. This absence of effect was not due to a lack of antifibrinolytic action, since the rate of rebleeding was reduced from 24 per cent in the control group to 9 per cent in the tranexamic acid-treated group (chi-square = 18.07, P less than 0.001), but resulted from a concurrent increase in the incidence of ischemic complications (15 per cent in the control group and 24 per cent in the tranexamic acid group; chi-square = 8.07, P less than 0.01). We conclude that until some method can be found to minimize ischemic complications, tranexamic acid is of no benefit in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. A randomized controlled clinical trial was carried out to study the effect of tranexamic acid (AMCA, Cyklokapron; AB Kabi, Stockholm, Sweden) in the prevention of early rebleeding after the rupture of an intracranial aneurysm. The incidence of vasospasm, hydrocephalus, cerebral ischemic and thromboembolic complications, morbidity, and mortality was also evaluated. The series comprises 59 patients, 30 treated with tranexamic acid and 29 controls. The treatment was stopped if there was rebleeding, operation, or discharge from the hospital. There were 6 recurrent hemorrhages in 6 patients in the tranexamic acid-treated group and 11 recurrences in 7 patients in the control group. Recurrent hemorrhages occurred later in tranexamic acid-treated patients than in controls. Five patients in each group died from rebleeding. Five additional treated patients and 2 controls died from cerebral ischemic dysfunction. The results suggest that tranexamic acid may protect patients with ruptured aneurysms from rebleeding for 1 or 2 weeks, but that it also may produce cerebral ischemic complications. Mean hemispheric cerebral blood flow (CBF) was studied after the intravenous administration of xenon-133 in 20 anesthetized patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Before early aneurysm operation, repeated CBF measurements were made to evaluate the cerebral vascular reactivity to controlled hyperventilation. Thirteen individuals received intravenous treatment with the calcium channel blocker nimodipine, whereas the other seven patients did not receive such specific antiischemic treatment. Five of the latter patients had an impaired CO2 response, and three showed delayed ischemic deterioration (DID), whereas none of the seven nimodipine-treated patients with impaired CO2 response showed DID. One nimodipine-treated patient with a preserved CO2 response, in whom operation was complicated, developed DID. The observed findings indicate that DID after uncomplicated early aneurysm operation may be associated with an early disturbance of cerebral vasoreactivity. Treatment with nimodipine may counteract the development of DID in patients with an impaired CBF CO2 response. A previous systematic review of randomized trials suggested a positive effect of antiplatelet therapy in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). We performed a randomized controlled trial to assess whether acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) reduces the risk of delayed ischemic neurological deficit (DIND) in patients with SAH.
                Criteria for inclusion were aneurysm treatment within 4 days after SAH. Trial medication (14 daily suppositories with 100 mg ASA or placebo) was started within 12 hours after aneurysm treatment. Analysis for the primary outcome event DIND was made according to the "on-treatment" principle and for the secondary outcome measures "poor outcome" and "nonexcellent outcome" according to the "intention-to-treat" principle.
                Inclusion was stopped after the second interim analysis, when 161 of the planned 200 patients were included, because by then the chances of a positive effect were negligible. At the final analysis, ASA did not reduce the risk of DIND (hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% CI, 0.85 to 3.9). The relative risk reduction for poor outcome was 21% (relative risk, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.6).
                ASA given after aneurysm treatment does not appreciably reduce the occurrence of DIND. Recent evidence has suggested that the delayed cerebral ischemic deficits that often follow surgery for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) may be due to a proliferative vasculopathy. This vascular pathology may result from an interaction between the platelets and the vessel wall. A single-blind controlled trial of dipyridamole administration in 677 patients presenting with SAH (of whom 348 came to surgery) was undertaken to test the hypothesis that the modification of platelet behavior might reduce the incidence of ischemic deficits. Blind independent assessment of the outcome in the surgical group based on the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the specific neurological deficits revealed no significant differences between the control and treatment groups. To assess the safety and feasibility of a clinical trial on the effectiveness of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).
                Several studies have indicated that increased platelet activity might be involved in the pathogenesis of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after SAH.
                Fifty patients who had early surgery (< or =4 days) for a ruptured aneurysm were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Trial medication, consisting of suppositories with 100 mg ASA versus placebo, was started immediately after surgical clipping of the aneurysm and continued for 21 days. End points were functional outcome and quality of life at 4 months, clinical deterioration after operation, development of DCI, hypodense lesion on postoperative CT, and hemorrhagic complications.
                One-third of all patients with aneurysmal SAH were eligible for the trial. Fifteen of 26 patients receiving placebo deteriorated clinically versus 10 of 24 patients receiving ASA; 4 patients in each group deteriorated from DCI. Postoperative hypodensities on CT were observed in 27 patients, distributed equally in both groups. Functional outcome and quality-of-life scores were slightly in favor of patients who had received ASA, but not to a significant degree (p = 0.22). Two patients in the ASA group had an asymptomatic hemorrhagic complication, and one patient in the placebo group had a fatal and another a symptomatic hemorrhagic complication.
                This pilot study shows that a clinical trial of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is feasible and probably safe. The effectiveness of ASA on functional outcome and delayed cerebral ischemia has to be studied in a larger trial.
Treatment does not improve clinical outcome because the benefit is offset by an increase in poor outcome caused by cerebral ischaemia as a result of treatment with antifibrinolytics. These data do not support the routine use of antifibrinolytic drugs in the treatment of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.