A prospective clinical trial of D-penicillamine in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis. Double blind controlled trial of d-penicillamine in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Trial of penicillamine in advanced primary biliary cirrhosis. A prospective trial of D-penicillamine in primary biliary cirrhosis. D-penicillamine treatment improves survival in primary biliary cirrhosis.
We conducted a prospective clinical trial to assess the relative efficacy and safety of high- vs. low-dose D-penicillamine in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Following clinical tests and liver biopsy diagnostic of primary biliary cirrhosis, 56 patients were randomized to receive either 250 or 750 mg D-penicillamine daily. Patients were monitored with clinical tests and annual liver biopsy. Randomization produced two groups without differences in demographic, clinical or histologic characteristics. During the trial, no differences were seen between the mean change in liver test results in patients in either treatment group. The 11% per year rise of bilirubin in the 750 mg dose group during the first 3 years was not significantly different from the 18% per year rise in the 250 mg dose group. No patient showed improvement on liver biopsy although patients on 750 mg D-penicillamine deteriorated more slowly. Side effects, particularly rash and dysgeusia, were more common in the 750 mg dose group. The frequency and severity of side effects were responsible for the early conclusion of our trial. Twenty-six patients experienced side effects necessitating discontinuation of D-penicillamine. No evidence of increased efficacy was demonstrated by high-dose D-penicillamine therapy, and side effects were observed in patients on 250 mg D-penicillamine daily. With the severity of adverse effects and continued progression of disease, D-penicillamine is not a clinically useful therapy in primary biliary cirrhosis. One hundred and eighty nine patients with primary biliary cirrhosis were entered into a double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial starting in January 1978 to assess the therapeutic value of d-penicillamine 1200 mg daily. Eighteen of the 98 patients receiving d-penicillamine and 22 of the 91 placebo treated patients died during the study. Thirty six per cent of those on d-penicillamine and 8% of those on placebo were withdrawn from the study. No difference in overall survival was noted between the two groups of patients whether the results were analysed for the entire period of observation or only during the period in which the patients were receiving therapy. The mortality rate of those receiving d-penicillamine in histological stage I to II, however, was one third of that of the placebo group although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Using the occurrence rate ratio as the statistical method of analysis, no effect of d-penicillamine was noted on any clinical, biochemical or histological features examined, except the serum alanine aminotransferase activity which was greater in those on active treatment. In this trial we have been unable to establish any therapeutic benefit from the drug. A total of 227 patients with histologically advanced primary biliary cirrhosis entered a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial to determine whether penicillamine (1 g per day) was therapeutically effective; 111 patients received the drug, and 116 received placebo. The two groups were highly comparable at entry with regard to clinical, biochemical, and histologic features. Penicillamine therapy did not result in an overall improvement in survival as compared with placebo. Clinical symptoms and serial hepatic laboratory values reflected the progressive nature of the disease and were similar in both groups. There were no substantial differences between treatment groups in the morphologic features of sequential biopsy specimens. The development of major side effects led to permanent discontinuation of penicillamine in 22 per cent of the patients taking the drug. We conclude that penicillamine is not useful for patients with histologically advanced primary biliary cirrhosis. The trial is being continued in patients with early histologic disease whose better prognosis necessitates longer follow-up. We evaluated D-penicillamine in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis. In a prospective double-blind trial, 26 patients received D-penicillamine (250 mg four times a day), and 26 received an identical placebo. Although the desired urinary excretion of copper was achieved in patients taking D-penicillamine, there was no improvement in survival or symptoms after 28 months. Serum bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase increased equally in both groups. Alanine and aspartate aminotransferases were lower in the D-penicillamine group, but serum albumin was also lower in this group. Liver histology worsened equally in both groups. Major side effects, some appearing more than 24 months after the start of treatment, occurred in 31 per cent of the patients receiving D-penicillamine. Less serious side effects occurred in an additional 46 per cent. We conclude that D-penicillamine at the dosage we used is not effective in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis and is associated with a high incidence of serious side effects. The copper-chelating, immunological, and antifibrotic effects of D-penicillamine indicated that it might be suitable for the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). In a randomised clinical trail, 55 PBC patients received penicillamine (600 mg daily), and 32 received a placebo. Drug reactions developed in 16 patients on penicillamine. All deaths occurred in patients with stage 3 or 4 (late stage) liver histology on entry to the study. 5 (14%) of 37 penicillamine-treated patients and 10 (43%) of 23 placebo patients have died (p less than 0.01). Improvement in survival only became evident after 18 months. Survivors in the penicillamine group demonstrated a significant fall in serum aspartate transaminase, serum immunoglobulins, and liver copper concentrations. On follow-up liver biopsy 12-72 months (median 33) after joining the study, 21% of penicillamine-treated patients had less pronounced inflammation and piecemeal necrosis, whereas there had been no improvement in patients on placebo (p less than 0.02). Penicillamine did not retard the histological evolution of the liver disease from the early prefibrotic stages to the late fibrotic or cirrhotic stages. Both the copper-chelating and immunological effects of penicillamine are probably important in improving survival. The excellent prognosis of patients with PBC in its early histological stages, and the failure of penicillamine to prevent histological progression from early to late stages, suggests that penicillamine treatment should not be given to patients with PBC in the early (stage 1 or 2) histological phase of the disease. Penicillamine treatment is recommended in patients once liver biopsy has demonstrated histological results typical of late stage 3 or 4 PBC.
D-penicillamine did not appear to reduce the risk of mortality, but significantly increased the occurrences of adverse events in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. We do not support the use of D-penicillamine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.