Association between efficacy and body weight or body mass index for two low-dose oral contraceptives. Evaluation of body composition during low-dose estrogen oral contraceptives treatment. Contraceptive failure rates of etonogestrel subdermal implants in overweight and obese women. Contraceptive efficacy and cycle control with the Ortho Evra/Evra transdermal system: the analysis of pooled data. Body weight does not impact pregnancy rates during use of a low-dose extended-regimen 91-day oral contraceptive. Adolescent use of the monthly contraceptive injection. [Variation of weigth among users of the contraceptive with depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate according to body mass index in a six-year follow-up]. Effects of low-dose oral contraceptives on body weight: results of a randomized study of up to 13 cycles of use. Effect of oral contraceptives on weight and body composition in young female runners.
This analysis investigated the association of oral contraceptive efficacy with body weight and body mass index (BMI) for hypothesis-generating purposes.
                Data were from a randomized, parallel-group trial of 180/215/250 mcg of norgestimate (NGM)/25 mcg of ethinyl estradiol (EE) (given to 1671 women) and 1 mg of norethindrone acetate (NETA)/20 mcg of EE (given to 1139 women). Pregnancies were evaluated across BMI deciles and by BMI and body weight dichotomies. A Pearl index was calculated for each treatment group. The relative risk (RR) of pregnancy was calculated with a Cox proportional hazards model.
                The Pearl index for women who received NGM/EE was 2.36 [95% confidence interval (CI)=1.33-3.40]; for those who received NETA/EE, the Pearl index was 3.29 (95% CI=1.81-4.77). Consistent, weak positive associations between weight and pregnancy risk were found. Overall, for women with a BMI >or=25 kg/m(2) (compared with women with a BMI <25 kg/m(2)), the RR of pregnancy was 1.84 (95% CI=0.98-3.45); that for women who received NGM/EE was 1.39 (95% CI=0.57-3.40), whereas that for women who received NETA/EE was 2.49 (95% CI=1.01-6.13). For women with a body weight >or=70 kg (compared with women with a body weight <70 kg), the RR was 1.25 (95% CI=0.63-2.46); that for women who received NGM/EE was 1.41 (95% CI=0.56-3.54), whereas that for women who received NETA/EE was 1.12 (95% CI=0.40-3.12).
                Women in the higher body weight or BMI category showed a small increase in the risk of pregnancy with these oral contraceptives, but this increase was not statistically significant overall or for either formulation studied. To determine in a prospective study if the use of two low-dose estrogen oral contraceptives is associated with changes in weight or body composition.
                80 outpatients referring to the family planning service, aged 18-43 years were randomly assigned to a treatment with the EE/desogestrel or EE/gestodene association, 20 patients with IUD, aged 26-40 years, were selected as a control group. Anthropometric data and body composition were taken at enrollment and after 6 and 12 months.
                Anthropometric measurements included body mass index (BMI), body composition estimated by mean of Bioelectrical Impendance Analysis (BIA).
                In the three groups weight, BMI, and total body water (TBW), and body cellular mass (BCM) remained unchanged during the study period.
                The use of EE/desogestrel and EE/gestodene is not associated with significant variations of body weight and body composition during one year treatment. To estimate the contraceptive failure rates of the etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implant in overweight and obese women and compare failure rates with women of normal weight and women using intrauterine devices (IUDs).
                The Contraceptive CHOICE Project is a large prospective cohort study designed to promote the use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods to reduce unintended pregnancies in the St Louis region. Participants are provided reversible contraception of their choice at no cost. We collected baseline height and weight of each participant. During each survey, participants were asked about missed menses and possible pregnancies. Any participant who suspected a pregnancy was asked to come in for urine pregnancy testing. Analysis includes the first 8,445 participants enrolled in CHOICE of which 1,168 chose the implant and 4,200 chose the IUD. Student's t test, χ test, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to perform statistical analyses to estimate failure rates in overweight and obese women using the implant and IUDs.
                Of the women choosing the implant, 28% were overweight and 35% were obese. Of the women who chose an IUD, 27% were overweight and 35% were obese. The 3-year cumulative failure rates for implant and IUD users were less than one per 100 women-years and did not vary by body mass index.
                We found no decrease in the effectiveness of the implant in overweight or obese women. The implant may be offered as a first-line contraceptive method to any woman seeking a reversible and reliable birth control method. To present efficacy and cycle control data pooled from three pivotal studies of the contraceptive patch (Ortho Evra/Evra).
                Three multicenter, open-label, contraceptive studies that included up to 13 treatment cycles.Setting: 183 centers.
                3,319 women.Intervention(s): Three consecutive 7-day patches (21 days) with 1 patch-free week per cycle.
                Contraceptive efficacy and cycle control.
                Overall and method failure life-table estimates of contraceptive failure through 13 cycles were 0.8% (95% CI, 0.3%-1.3%) and 0.6% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.9%), respectively. Corresponding Pearl indices were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.44-1.33) and 0.7 (95% CI, 0.31-1.10). Contraceptive failure among women with a body weight < 90 kg (<198 lb) was low and uniformly distributed across the weight range. A subgroup of women with body weight > or = 90 kg (> or = 198 lb) may have increased risk of pregnancy. The incidence of breakthrough bleeding was low and decreased over time.
                In contraceptive patch users, the overall annual probability of pregnancy was 0.8% and the method failure probability was 0.6%. The efficacy of the patch was high and similar across age and racial groups. Among women < 90 kg (<198 lb), contraceptive failure was low and uniformly distributed across the range of body weights. In women > or = 90 kg (> or = 198 lb), contraceptive failures may be increased. Efficacy and cycle control have been shown to be comparable to an established oral contraceptive. This study evaluated the impact of weight on efficacy during use of an extended oral contraceptive (OC).
                Data were from a Phase 3 clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a low-dose 91-day extended regimen of 100 mcg levonorgestrel/20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (LNG/EE; 84 days)+10 mcg EE (7 days) for the prevention of pregnancy. Crude pregnancy rates were calculated for weight and body mass index (BMI) deciles.
                Of the 1736 women in this analysis, 878 (50.6%) had a BMI greater than 25 kg/m2, and 770 (44.4%) were heavier than 70 kg. Pregnancies occurred in 36 women. Crude pregnancy rates were similar across weight and BMI deciles, with no discernable differences observed between deciles using either classification criterion.
                No evidence of any reduction in the level of contraceptive efficacy was observed with this low-dose extended OC regimen in overweight and obese women.
                Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc. To compare weight and continuation among adolescents using monthly medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)/ethinyl estradiol cypionate (E2C), tri-monthly depot MPA (DMPA), and daily oral contraceptive pills (OCP).
                Medical records were reviewed for body mass index, demographics, and sexual history at baseline; and weight and continuation at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Bivariate analyses were performed by method, and continuation functions were compared by the log-rank and Wilcoxon tests. The effect of method on use duration was assessed by Cox regression.
                Hospital adolescent clinic.
                12- to 21-year-old patients who initiated MPA/E2C, DMPA, or OCPs in 2001.
                Weight gain and method continuation.
                MPA/E2C was initiated by 40 (18%) patients, DMPA by 63 (28%), and OCPs by 119 (54%, P < 0.001). OCP users were younger (P = 0.005) and more likely to be white, privately insured, and in school (P < 0.004) than MPA/E2C or DMPA users. Previous DMPA and OCP use, pregnancy, and sexually transmitted infections (STI) were more common among MPA/E2C than DMPA or OCP users (P < or = 0.001). Baseline BMI was lowest (P = 0.06) among DMPA users, and MPA/E2C users were most likely to be overweight (P = 0.03). There were non-significant differences in weight change. Continuation functions differed by the method only in the first three months of use (P = 0.03). Leading reasons for discontinuation were unavailability of MPA/E2C (20%), bleeding with DMPA (22%), and forgetting OCPs (17%). Duration of use was independently associated with white race (P < 0.005) and STI-never (P < 0.0001) but not with method type.
                Although MPA/E2C use was associated with overweight status and early discontinuation, it also was associated with previous use of other methods. For all methods, poor continuation at one year supports the ongoing search for effective contraceptive alternatives. To determine weight variation in women with different Body Mass Index (BMI) in use of trimestral injections of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), and compare it to women users of a non-hormonal method.
                Retrospective study with the chart review of 226 DMPA users and 603 controls, users of DIU TCu380A. Women were distributed in categories, according to their initial BMI, as having normal weight (<25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25 to 29,9 kg/m(2)) and being obese (>or=30 kg/m(2)), and were followed-up for six years, with yearly measurements of weight and BMI. The statistic test ANOVA was used to measure the weight variation among the groups in each BMI category every year.
                The average age at the onset of the method employed was higher in the study group than in the controls, in all the BMI categories: 31.6+/-SD 7.1 X 27.4+/-SD 5.5 in the normal weight category (p<0.0001); 37.3+/-SD 6.8 X 29.2+/-SD 6.0 in the overweight category (p<0.0001); and 35.3+/-SD 6.4 X 29.7+/-SD 5.8 among obese women (p<0.0001). DMPA users showed weight increase as compared to the controls in the overweight category (p=0.0082); and the weight increase along the observation period was also higher among the DMPA users than among the controls, for the normal weight (p<0.0001) and overweight (p=0.0008) categories. In the obese group, there was no BMI variation between the groups, nor along the period during which they were using the method.
                There was no change in weight gain among DMPA users from the obese category. Prospective studies should be done with metabolic tests to establish the determining factors of weight gain in normal and overweight women. To compare the effect of 2 oral contraceptives (OCs) on body weight.
                A randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study of 1,723 women taking an OC with norgestimate (NGM) 180/215/250 microg/ethinyl estradiol (EE) 25 microg vs. 1,171 women taking on OC with norethindrone acetate 1 mg/EE 20 microg for 6-13 cycles was performed. Body weight changes between baseline and cycle 6 and baseline and cycle 13 were analyzed. Analysis included not only changes in mean body weight but also the distribution of changes that were within 5% of baseline weight, 5-10% of baseline weight and > 10% of baseline weight. Only the 10% change was felt to be clinically significant.
                The distribution of body weight changes did not statistically differ between the 2 OC groups for any parameter measured. The mean weight change after 6 months for the NGM/EE and norethindrone acetate/EE groups was +0.71 kg and +0.57 kg, respectively. At 13 cycles for the NGM/EE and norethindrone acetate/ EE groups, the mean body weight change was +0.93 kg and +0.62 kg, respectively. Only 0.3% of subjects in both OC groups experienced a 10% change in weight.
                Use of OCs does not substantially affect body weight for most women. To examine the effect of oral contraceptives (OC) on body weight, fat mass, percent body fat, and lean mass in young female distance runners.
                The study population consisted of 150 female competitive distance runners aged 18-26 yr who had participated in a 2-yr randomized trial of the effect of the OC Lo/Ovral (30 microg of ethinyl estradiol and 0.3 mg of norgestrel) on bone health. Weight and body composition were measured approximately yearly by balance beam scales and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, respectively.
                Women randomized to the OC group tended to gain slightly less weight (adjusted mean difference (AMD) = -0.54 +/- 0.31 kg.yr, P = 0.09) and less fat (AMD = -0.35 +/- 0.25 kg.yr, P = 0.16) than those randomized to the control group. OC assignment was associated with a significant gain in lean mass relative to controls among eumenorrheic women (those who had 10 or more menstrual cycles in the year before baseline; AMD = 0.77 +/- 0.17 kg.yr, P < 0.0001) but not among women with fewer than 10 menstrual cycles in that year (AMD = 0.02 +/- 0.35 kg.yr, P = 0.96). Treatment-received analyses yielded similar results.
                This randomized trial confirms previous findings that OC use does not cause weight or fat mass gain, at least among young female runners. Our finding that this OC is associated with lean mass gain in eumenorrheic runners, but not in those with irregular menses, warrants examination in other studies.
The evidence did not generally show an association of BMI with effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives. However, the evidence was limited for any individual contraceptive method. Studies using BMI (rather than weight alone) can provide more information about whether body composition is related to contraceptive effectiveness. The efficacy of subdermal implants and injectable contraceptives may be unaffected by body mass. The contraceptive methods examined here are among the most effective when the recommended regimen is followed.
The overall quality of evidence was low for this review. More recent reports provided moderate quality evidence, while the older studies provided evidence of low or very low quality for our purposes. Investigators should consider adjusting for potential confounding related to BMI. Trials should be designed to include sufficient numbers of overweight or obese women to adequately examine effectiveness and side effects of hormonal contraceptives within those groups.