Low-dose prednisone therapy for patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis: clinical efficacy, disease-modifying properties, and side effects: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Preliminary evidence for a structural benefit of the new bisphosphonate zoledronic acid in early rheumatoid arthritis. Multifaceted intervention to improve rheumatologists' management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Radiographic evaluation of erosion in rheumatoid arthritis: double blind study of auranofin vs placebo. A comparison of etanercept and methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. [Misoprostol in the prevention of gastric erosions caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents]. A randomised placebo controlled 12 week trial of budesonide and prednisolone in rheumatoid arthritis. Oral steroids as bridge therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients starting with parenteral gold. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Oral glucocorticoids combined with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are beneficial and retard radiologic joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.
                To investigate the clinical efficacy, disease-modifying properties, and side effects of low-dose glucocorticoids as monotherapy for previously untreated patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis.
                2-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
                2 outpatient rheumatology clinics.
                81 patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis who had not been treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.
                41 patients were assigned to 10 mg of oral prednisone per day, and 40 were assigned to placebo. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were allowed in both groups. After 6 months, sulfasalazine (2 g/d) could be prescribed as rescue medication.
                Clinical variables were assessed at baseline and every 3 months; radiologic studies were performed every 6 months. Adverse effects were documented every 3 months.
                In the first 6 months, the prednisone group showed more clinical improvement than the placebo group. This effect was not seen after 6 months except in grip strength and the 28-joint score for tenderness. Use of additional therapies was significantly less common in the prednisone group, particularly in the first 6 months. More than 65% of those who completed the study were not taking sulfasalazine. After month 6, radiologic scores showed significantly less progression in the prednisone group than in the placebo group. No clinically relevant adverse effects were observed, except for a higher incidence of osteoporotic fractures in the prednisone group.
                Prednisone, 10 mg/d, provides clinical benefit, particularly in the first 6 months, and substantially inhibits progression of radiologic joint damage in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis and no previous treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Because of their limited disease-modifying effects, glucocorticoids should be combined with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclast activity, which is central to the development of bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to assess whether treatment with zoledronic acid, compared with placebo, could achieve a > or = 50% reduction in the development of new erosions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with early RA.
                In this proof-of-concept study, 39 patients with early RA and clinical synovitis of the hand/wrist were randomized to receive infusions with either zoledronic acid (5 mg) or placebo, administered at baseline and week 13. Patients in both groups received methotrexate (MTX) at a dosage of 7.5-20 mg/week. MRI and plain radiography were performed at baseline and week 26.
                At week 26, the mean +/- SD change in MRI hand and wrist erosions was 61% lower in the zoledronic acid group compared with the placebo group (0.9 +/- 1.63 versus 2.3 +/- 3.09; P = 0.176). The mean +/- SD increase in the number of hand and wrist bones with erosions was 0.3 +/- 0.75 for zoledronic acid compared with 1.4 +/- 1.77 for placebo (P = 0.029). The proportion of patients in whom new MRI-visualized bone edema developed was smaller in the zoledronic acid group compared with the placebo group (33% versus 58%; P = 0.121). The zoledronic acid group had a mean change in the number of radiographic erosions of 0.1 compared with 0.5 for the placebo group (P = 0.677). The safety profile of zoledronic acid was similar to that of placebo.
                The results of this study suggest a structural benefit associated with zoledronic acid therapy in patients with RA, as demonstrated by consistent results in structural end points in favor of zoledronic acid plus MTX compared with MTX alone. To assess the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP).
                Of 21 rheumatologists, 11 were randomly assigned to a 3-part intervention consisting of a lecture and discussion regarding optimal management of GIOP, a confidential doctor-specific audit regarding management of GIOP, and a reminder mailing including concise pharmacologic recommendations. The remaining 10 rheumatologists received no special education. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) taking oral glucocorticoids seen in the 2 months after the intervention were followed for 6 months. Medical records were assessed to determine the proportion undergoing bone mineral density testing or receiving pharmacologic interventions for GIOP during the 6 months before and 6 months after the intervention.
                There were 373 patients with RA taking oral glucocorticoids whose records were assessed. Patients in both arms of the trial were similar with respect to age, sex, menopausal status, glucocorticoid dosage and duration, duration of RA, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use, and the proportion with comorbid conditions. At baseline, there was no significant difference between the patients with respect to osteoporosis medication use (intervention 32% versus control 34%) or bone densitometry use (intervention 9% versus control 5%). After the intervention and a 6-month followup period, there were no differences in treatment (intervention 33% versus control 38%) or bone densitometry use (intervention 8% versus control 8%). Adjusting for patient and physician characteristics did not significantly change these results.
                A multifaceted intervention for GIOP, including doctor education, practice audit, and treatment suggestions, had no significant benefit on testing or treatment by rheumatologists over a 6-month followup period. Other intervention approaches need to be tested. PA radiographs of hands and wrists from a randomized 6 month study of auranofin (AF) vs placebo followed by 6 months of open AF were scored for progression of erosive disease by 2 independent readers. The readers were blinded both to treatment and sequence (month 0 vs month 12) of the films. The results of our study demonstrate a reduction in the advancement of erosive disease during AF therapy compared to placebo. Etanercept, which blocks the action of tumor necrosis factor, reduces disease activity in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis. Its efficacy in reducing disease activity and preventing joint damage in patients with active early rheumatoid arthritis is unknown.
                We treated 632 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis with either twice-weekly subcutaneous etanercept (10 or 25 mg) or weekly oral methotrexate (mean, 19 mg per week) for 12 months. Clinical response was defined as the percent improvement in disease activity according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology. Bone erosion and joint-space narrowing were measured radiographically and scored with use of the Sharp scale. On this scale, an increase of 1 point represents one new erosion or minimal narrowing.
                As compared with patients who received methotrexate, patients who received the 25-mg dose of etanercept had a more rapid rate of improvement, with significantly more patients having 20 percent, 50 percent, and 70 percent improvement in disease activity during the first six months (P<0.05). The mean increase in the erosion score during the first 6 months was 0.30 in the group assigned to receive 25 mg of etanercept and 0.68 in the methotrexate group (P= 0.001), and the respective increases during the first 12 months were 0.47 and 1.03 (P=0.002). Among patients who received the 25-mg dose of etanercept, 72 percent had no increase in the erosion score, as compared with 60 percent of patients in the methotrexate group (P=0.007). This group of patients also had fewer adverse events (P=0.02) and fewer infections (P= 0.006) than the group that was treated with methotrexate.
                As compared with oral methotrexate, subcutaneous [corrected] etanercept acted more rapidly to decrease symptoms and slow joint damage in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis. A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out to determine whether the synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol is effective in preventing gastric and duodenal lesions induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Two hundred fifty-six patients under nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment (diclofenac, naproxen, piroxicam, ibuprofen, indomethacin, ketoprofen, or tiaprofenic acid) for osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or other rheumatic diseases were included in the study. None of the patients had patent gastroduodenal damage at entry (0 to 3 mucosal erosions or subepithelial hemorrhages on endoscopy). Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with misoprostol 400 micrograms/d (M 400), misoprostol 800 micrograms/d (M 800) or a placebo. Results of the follow-up endoscopy on day 28 in the 186 evaluable patients showed that gastric erosions were significantly less common (p < or = 0.02) in the two misoprostol groups (5% and 2% in the M 400 and M 800 groups respectively) than in the placebo group (19%). Similar small numbers of patients in the three groups had gastric subepithelial hemorrhages or duodenal lesions. Three patients developed gastric ulcers in the placebo group, versus none in the misoprostol groups. Misoprostol therapy did not modify the efficacy of the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agent on pain or other rheumatologic manifestations. Diarrhea occurred in 1%, 10%, and 5% of patients in the M 400, M 800, and placebo groups, respectively. In conclusion, misoprostol given in combination with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent for 28 days significantly reduced the incidence of gastric erosions in a random sample of patients with a variety of rheumatic diseases. The daily dosage associated with the best risk/benefit ratio may be 400 micrograms/day. To compare budesonide, a locally acting glucocorticoid with minimal systemic exposure, with conventional glucocorticoid treatment and placebo in rheumatoid arthritis.
                A double blind, randomised, controlled trial over 12 weeks in 143 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis, comparing budesonide 3 mg daily, budesonide 9 mg daily, prednisolone 7.5 mg daily, and placebo. Particular attention was paid to the pattern of clinical response and to changes in the four week period following discontinuation of treatment.
                There were improvements in tender joint count and swollen joint count on budesonide 9 mg compared with placebo (28% for tender and 34% for swollen joint counts, p<0.05). Prednisolone 7.5 mg gave similar results, while budesonide 3 mg was less effective. ACR20 response criteria were met by 25% of patients on placebo, 22% on budesonide 3 mg, 42% on budesonide 9 mg, and 56% on prednisolone 7.5 mg. A rapid and significant reduction in symptoms and signs in response to budesonide 9 mg and prednisolone 7.5 mg was evident by two weeks and maximal at eight weeks. There was no evidence that budesonide provided a different pattern of symptom control from prednisolone, or that symptoms became worse than placebo treatment levels after discontinuation of glucocorticoid treatment. Adverse effects attributable to glucocorticoids were equally common in all groups.
                The symptomatic benefits of budesonide 9 mg and prednisolone 7.5 mg are achieved within a short time of initiating treatment, are maintained for three months, and are not associated with any rebound in symptoms after stopping treatment. The efficacy of oral prednisone as bridge therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was studied. Forty patients starting aurothioglucose were randomized to receive either prednisone or placebo for 18 weeks. The dose was 10 mg/day in the first 12 weeks, 7.5 mg/day in weeks 13 and 14, 5 mg/day in weeks 15 and 16, and 2.5 mg/day in weeks 17 and 18. Patients were followed for 44 weeks. We found that disease activity was significantly lower in the prednisone group as early as week 1 and continued up to week 12. Response to prednisone was noticed in 60% of the patients. After tapering prednisone, a rebound deterioration was noticed at weeks 20 and 24 in 58% of the responders. No significant differences in X-ray progression were found between the two groups. We concluded that oral prednisone (10 mg/day) significantly reduces short-term disease activity in 60% of patients with active RA. The rebound deterioration after tapering the dose means that bridge therapy with prednisone using this dose-reduction scheme is not recommended.
Even in the most conservative estimate, the evidence that glucocorticoids given in addition to standard therapy can substantially reduce the rate of erosion progression in rheumatoid arthritis is convincing. There remains concern about potential long-term adverse reactions to glucocorticoid therapy, such as increased cardiovascular risk, and this issue requires further research.