Randomized prospective clinical study of small, large and twice-a-day fraction radiotherapy for painful bone metastases. Pain relief and quality of life following radiotherapy for bone metastases: a randomised trial of two fractionation schedules. Randomized trial of single dose versus fractionated palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases. Irradiation of bone metastases in breast cancer patients: a randomized study with 1 year follow-up. Rapid course radiation therapy vs. more standard treatment: a randomized trial for bone metastases. Prospective randomised trial of single and multifraction radiotherapy schedules in the treatment of painful bony metastases. [Remineralization and pain relief in bone metastases after after different radiotherapy fractions (10 times 3 Gy vs. 1 time 8 Gy). A prospective study]. A randomized trial of a single treatment versus conventional fractionation in the palliative radiotherapy of painful bone metastases. 8 Gy single fraction radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic skeletal pain: randomised comparison with a multifraction schedule over 12 months of patient follow-up. Bone Pain Trial Working Party. [A randomized trial of single and multifraction radiation therapy for bone metastasis: a preliminary report]. The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: a global analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study. Results of a randomized phase-III trial to evaluate the efficacy of strontium-89 adjuvant to local field external beam irradiation in the management of endocrine resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Samarium-153-Lexidronam complex for treatment of painful bone metastases in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. A comparison of the palliative effects of strontium-89 and external beam radiotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer. A prospective randomised trial of 4 Gy or 8 Gy single doses in the treatment of metastatic bone pain. Intravenous pamidronate disodium treatment of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. A dose-seeking study. 89Sr versus 153Sm-EDTMP: comparison of treatment efficacy of painful bone metastases in prostate and breast carcinoma.
A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing small, large and twice-a-day fraction for the relief of painful bone metastases was performed from 1981 to 1986 at Tokyo Women's Medical College Hospital. Eighty patients with painful bone metastases (92 sites) were divided into three radiation methods which were conventional fraction scheme of 5 times/week at 2 Gy/day for a total of 30 Gy/15 fractions (Group I, TDF: 49), 2 times/week at 4.5 Gy/day for a total of 22.5 Gy/5 fractions (Group II, TDF: 50) and 3 times/week at 2 Gy/day twice a day at a minimum interval of 6 h for a total of 20 Gy/10 fractions (Group III). Pain was assessed using a score and response rate was 76% in Group I, 75% in Group II and 78% in Group III which were not statistically significant mutually. Group II and III regimes were found to have an earlier shorter onset of pain relief than Group I, but the dose of onset of pain relief was almost the same. Our data suggested that individualization of radiotherapy schedules based on to assess the patient's condition and the expected quality of life and to consider radiation site and size of field, was more important than the fractionation regime in the treatment of painful bone metastases. The optimum dose and fractionation schedule for the palliative irradiation of painful bone metastases is controversial.
                To compare the efficacy, side-effects and effect on quality of life of two commonly used radiotherapy schedules in the management of painful bone metastases.
                In a prospective trial, 280 patients were randomised to receive either a single 10 Gy treatment or a course of 22.5 Gy in five daily fractions for the relief of localised metastatic bone pain.
                Response rates have been calculated from 240 assessable treated sites of pain. The overall response rates were 83.7% (single treatment) and 89.2% (five fractions). The complete response rates were 38.8% (single treatment) and 42.3% (five fractions). The median duration of pain control was 13.5 weeks (single treatment) and 14.0 weeks (five fractions). None of these differences was statistically significant. There were no differences between the groups in the effect of treatment on a variety of quality of life parameters.
                It is concluded that a single 10 Gy treatment is as effective as a course of 22.5 Gy in five fractions in the management of painful bone metastases. Data in the literature suggest that for painful bone metastases a single dose is as effective as fractionated radiotherapy. In the present multicentre prospective trial, the effects of 8 Gy x1 and 5 Gy x4 were compared.
                A total of 241 patients were randomized to 8 Gy (122 patients) or 20 Gy (119 patients). The primary tumour was in the breast in 39% of patients, in the prostate in 34% of patients, in the lung in 13% of patients and in other locations in 14% of patients. Outcome measures were pain relief as measured by VAS and in half of the patients also by a five-point categorical pain scale, global quality of life (QoL) and analgesic consumption. Evaluation was performed before and 4, 8, 12 and 20 weeks after treatment.
                A total of 239 patients were evaluable for response. The two groups did not differ with respect to age, sex, primary tumour, metastasis localization, analgesic consumption (type and dose), performance status, prior systemic treatment, degree of pain and QoL. The treatment was completed as planned in 98% of patients. The degree of pain relief did not differ between the two treatment groups. At 4 weeks the difference in pain relief was 6% (95% CI 7, 20%) and at 8 weeks the difference was 13% (95% CI 3, 28%). Neither was there any significant difference in the duration of pain relief, the number of new painful sites and the need for reirradiation and toxicity was minor.
                The present randomized study showed that a single fraction of 8 Gy was as effective as 5 Gy x4 in relieving pain from bone metastasis. The results from a prospective randomized trial comparing two different radiation schedules for treatment of painful bone metastases in women with recurrent breast cancer are presented. A total of 217 patients with painful bone metastases were randomized to either 30 Grey (Gy) in ten fractions, five fractions a week (5F/W) or 15 Gy in three fractions 2F/W. The effect of treatment was evaluated by pain assessment, the radiological response and the degree of side-effects. The patients were rated at start of treatment and after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. No difference between the two radiation regimes was found, neither in achieved pain relief, improvement in level of activity and medication, nor was there any difference in radiological response and side-effects from treatment. Both regimes resulted in a significant improvement in both pain score and level of activity 1 month after treatment, an improvement which persisted during the follow-up period. We conclude that 15 Gy given in three fractions 2F/W is as effective as 30 Gy in ten fractions 5F/W, but more convenient to the patient and of less cost to society. In a prospective randomized trial we examined whether radiotherapy of painful bone metastases can be shortened using larger single doses without impairing effectivity.
                One hundred patients with painful bone metastases having no prior surgical intervention or treatment with x-ray therapy and had a median follow-up of 12 months were analyzed. The primary tumor was located in the breast in 43%, in the lung in 24%, and in the prostate in 14%. The most frequent sites of metastases were the pelvis (31%), the vertebral column (30%), and the ribs (20%). Further percentages of sites were: lower extremity 11%, upper extremity 6%, and skull 2%. Fifty-one patients received a short course radiotherapy with a total dose of 20 Gy in 1 week (daily dose 4 Gy), and 49 patients received 30 Gy in 3 weeks (daily dose 2 Gy).
                There were no significant differences in frequency, duration of pain relief, improvement of mobility, recalcification, frequency of pathologic fractures nor survival. There was a light trend favoring 30 Gy in frequency of pain relief and recalcification. Survival was mostly influenced by primary tumor site, Karnofsky performance status, and possibly by the response to radiotherapy (pain relief).
                Because of the very short life expectancy of patients with metastatic bone disease, we now use 20 Gy in 1 week as our standard to reduce hospital stay. A prospective randomised trial comparing a single fraction of 8 Gy with 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions for the relief of metastatic bone pain was performed. In 28 months, 288 patients were randomised. Pain was assessed using a questionnaire completed by the patient at home on a daily basis. No difference was found in the speed of onset or duration of pain relief between the two treatment regimes, and pain relief was independent of the histology of the primary tumour. In a prospective randomized trial we examined pain relief and recalcification following radiotherapy for bone metastases.
                One hundred and seven patients with histologically proven breast, lung, prostate or kidney cancer and radiologically confirmed bone metastases were included in this trial. They were stratified to primary tumor sites and randomized in 2 different fractionation schedules: 1 x 8 Gy vs 10 x 3 Gy. Pain relief was registered using of pain score, analgesic usage and subjective perception of pain. The recalcification was measured at the computertomograph. Pain status and recalcification were assessed before, day after, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after radiotherapy.
                There was no significant difference in overall (81% vs 78%) and complete (33% vs 31%) pain response. In the single dose group (1 x 8 Gy) the pain response was measured a little rarer. The recalcification showed a significant difference between patients in the fractionated group (173%) and the single dose group (120%, p < 0.0001). In the fractionated group there was a significant difference between patients with breast and lung cancer (p = 0.015). There was a slight trend favoring 10 x 3 Gy in recalcification for all primary tumor sites but only a significant difference in breast cancer (p < 0.001).
                The basis of pain response and recalcification is different. In mere consideration of pain a short-course fractionation is recommendable. This fractionation schedule is effective, well tolerable and short. In consideration of recalcification a more fractionated schedule is recommendable because the biological efficacy is higher and this leads to better stabilisation. In a randomized prospective trial of radiotherapy in 29 patients. Comparing 24 Gy in six fractions is two to three weeks with a single treatment of 8 Gy in the palliative treatment of bone metastasis no differences could be detected in daily subjective pain scores for one month or monthly objective scores for six months. Of the single treatment group 25% required retreatment. Daily subjective record of nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea, skin reaction and lethargy for one month showed no difference between the two groups. Palliative radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain using a single treatment is recommended. To compare a single fraction of 8 Gy with a course of multifraction radiotherapy in terms of long-term benefits and short-term side effects in patients with painful skeletal metastases.
                Seven hundred and sixty-five patients with painful skeletal metastases requiring palliative radiotherapy were entered into a prospective randomised clinical trial comparing 8 Gy single fraction with a multifraction regimen (20 Gy/5 fractions or 30 Gy/10 fractions). Patients recorded pain severity and analgesic requirements on self-assessment questionnaires before treatment, at 2 weeks and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months after radiotherapy. Pain relief was the primary endpoint of treatment benefit. Short-term side-effects were compared in a subset of 133 consecutive patients who graded nausea, vomiting and antiemetic usage prior to treatment and at daily intervals from days I to 14.
                Overall survival at 12 months was 44%, with no statistically significant difference apparent between randomised groups. There were no differences in the time to first improvement in pain, time to complete pain relief or in time to first increase in pain at any time up to 12 months from randomisation, nor in the class of analgesic used. Retreatment was twice as common after 8 Gy than after multifraction radiotherapy, although retreatment for residual or recurrent pain did not reflect a difference between randomised groups in the probability of pain relief. The difference in the rate of retreatment is thought to reflect a greater readiness to prescribe radiotherapy after a single fraction, not a greater need. There were no significant differences in the incidence of nausea, vomiting, spinal cord compression or pathological fracture between the two groups.
                A single fraction of 8 Gy is as safe and effective as a multifraction regimen for the palliation of metastatic bone pain for at least 12 months. The greater convenience and lower cost make 8 Gy single fraction the treatment of choice for the majority of patients. From April, 1989 through January, 1990, a randomized trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy of single fraction radiation treatment (8, 10, 12, 15Gy) compared to a multifraction dose schedule (5Gy x 4, 5Gy x 5, 5Gy x 6) as a therapy for a bone metastasis. Both subjective and objective pain scores were used to measure the therapeutic results. A total of 31 patients participated in the trial and, for analysis, 27 of these patients were follow-up for more than 8 weeks after the start of the radiation therapy. The following statistics resulted. Of the single fraction series, symptomatic pain relief was obtained in 86% of the patients (12/14 treatment areas), and of the multifraction series, 92% (12/13). Further, a complete response was achieved in 57% (8/14) of the single fraction patients and 31% (4/13) of the multifraction patients, respectively. Between the two treatment regimens, no difference was found in the incidence of pain relief, speed of onset, or acute morbidity. Finally, no severe morbidity was seen in either arm. To answer the question whether a single fraction of radiotherapy that is considered more convenient to the patient is as effective as a dose of multiple fractions for palliation of painful bone metastases. Patients: 1171 patients were randomised to receive either 8 Gy x 1 (n = 585) or 4 Gy x 6 (n = 586). The primary tumour was in the breast in 39% of the patients, in the prostate in 23%, in the lung in 25% and in other locations in 13%. Bone metastases were located in the spine (30%), pelvis (36%), femur (10%), ribs (8%), humerus (6%) and other sites (10%).
                Questionnaires were mailed to collect information on pain, analgesics consumption, quality of life and side effects during treatment. The main endpoint was pain measured on a pain scale from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Costs per treatment schedule were estimated.
                On average, patients participated in the study for 4 months. Median survival was 7 months. Response was defined as a decrease of at least two points as compared to the initial pain score. The difference in response between the two treatment groups proved not significant and stayed well within the margin of 10%. Overall, 71% experienced a response at some time during the first year. An analysis of repeated measures confirmed that the two treatment schedules were equivalent in terms of palliation. With regard to pain medication, quality of life and side effects no differences between the two treatment groups were found. The total number of retreatments was 188 (16%). This number was 147 (25%) in the 8 Gy x 1 irradiation group and 41 (7%) in the 4 Gy x 6 group. It was shown that the level of pain was an important reason to retreat. There were also indications that doctors were more willing to retreat patients in the single fraction group because time to retreatment was substantially shorter in this group and the preceding pain score was lower. Unexpectedly, more pathological fractures were observed in the single fraction group, but the absolute percentage was low. In a cost-analysis, the costs of the 4 Gy x 6 and the 8 Gy x 1 treatment schedules were calculated at 2305 and 1734 Euro respectively. Including the costs of retreatment reduced this 25% cost difference to only 8%. The saving of radiotherapy capacity, however, was considered the major economic advantage of the single dose schedule.
                The global analysis of the Dutch study indicates the equality of a single fraction as compared to a 6 fraction treatment in patients with painful bone metastases provided that 4 times more retreatments are accepted in the single dose group. This equality is also shown in long term survivors. A more detailed analysis of the study is in progress. A large proportion of the practice of radiotherapy in the management of metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate is associated with palliation of pain from osseous metastases and improving quality of life. Radiation therapy is well known to be effective in treating painful sites and may also be effective in reducing the propensity for adjuvantly treated disease to become symptomatic. Strontium-89 is a systemic radionuclide that has clinical efficacy in the palliation of pain from bony metastases.
                The study was a Phase-III randomized placebo control trial performed in eight Canadian Cancer Centers to evaluate the effectiveness of strontium-89 as an adjunct to local field radiotherapy. Patients with endocrine refractory metastatic prostate cancer received local field radiotherapy and either strontium-89 as a single injection of 10.8 mCi or placebo.
                One hundred twenty-six patients were recruited. No significant differences in survival or in relief of pain at the index site where noted. Intake of analgesics over time demonstrated a significant reduction in the arm treated with strontium-89. Progression of pain as measured by sites of new pain or the requirement for radiotherapy showed statistically significant differences between the arms in favor of strontium-89. Tumor makers including prostate specific antigen, acid phosphatase, and alkaline phosphatase were also reduced in patients receiving strontium-89. A Quality-of-Life analysis was performed as a multivariate data set and demonstrated an overall superiority of strontium-89 with alleviation of pain and improvement in physical activity being statistically significant. Toxicity was evaluated and demonstrated increased hematological toxicity in the group receiving strontium-89.
                It is concluded that the addition of strontium-89 is an effective adjuvant therapy to local field radiotherapy reducing progression of disease as evidenced by new sites of pain and the requirement of further radiotherapy and improving quality-of-life and need for analgesic support in this group of patients. A Phase III randomized trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of samarium-153 (153Sm)-lexidronam for palliation of bone pain in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.
                A total of 152 men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and painful bone metastases were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing radioactive (153Sm) versus nonradioactive (152Sm) lexidronam complexes. Patients were randomized (2:1) to the radioactive (153Sm) agent. Patient diaries recording daily pain and analgesic use were completed during a planned 16-week evaluation period. Nonresponders were informed of the treatment received after 4 weeks of treatment and, if initially treated with placebo, were allowed to receive 153Sm-lexidronam in an open-label fashion. Pain was measured using validated patient-derived visual analog scales and pain descriptor scales.
                153Sm-lexidronam had positive effects on measures of pain relief compared with placebo within 1 to 2 weeks. Reductions in opioid use were recorded at weeks 3 and 4. Because nonresponders were unblinded at week 4, statistical comparisons between the arms beyond week 4 were not possible. Mild, transient bone marrow suppression was the only adverse event associated with 153Sm-lexidronam administration. The mean nadir white blood cell and platelet count (3 to 4 weeks after treatment) was 3800/microL and 127,000/microL, respectively. Counts recovered to baseline after approximately 8 weeks. No grade 4 decreases in either platelets or white bloods cells were documented.
                These findings demonstrate that 1 mCi/kg 153Sm-lexidronam is both safe and effective for the palliation of painful bone metastases in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. From 1988 to 1991, 284 patients with prostatic cancer and painful bone metastases were treated with either radiotherapy or strontium-89 (200 MBq). Patients were first stratified according to suitability for local or hemibody radiotherapy, then randomly allocated that form of treatment or strontium-89 (i.v. injection). After 4, 8 and 12 weeks pain sites were mapped, toxicity monitored, and all additional palliative treatments recorded. There was no significant difference in median survival (after > 80% had died); 33 weeks following strontium-89 and 28 weeks following radiotherapy (p = 0.1). All treatments provided effective pain relief; improvement was sustained to 3 months in 63.6% after hemibody radiotherapy compared with 66.1% after strontium-89, and in 61% after local radiotherapy compared with 65.9% in the comparable strontium-89 group. Fewer patients reported new pain sites after strontium-89 than after local or hemibody radiotherapy (p < 0.05). Radiotherapy to a new site was required by 12 patients in the local radiotherapy group compared with 2 after strontium-89 (p < 0.01), although there was no significant difference between hemibody radiotherapy (6 patients) and strontium-89 (9 patients) in this respect. Platelets and leukocytes fell by an average 30-40% after strontium-89 but sequelae were uncommon, and other symptoms rare. 270 patients with painful bone metastases requiring palliative radiotherapy were randomised to receive single fractions of 4 Gy or 8 Gy in a randomised trial. Pain scores and analgesic usage were recorded before treatment and at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Pain was assessed by patients on a 4 point graded scale using pain charts administered by a central trials office. Response was defined as an improved rating compared to the pretreatment value. Compliance with the pain chart was 72% at 4 weeks. At 4 weeks, the actual response rates were 69% for 8 Gy and 44% for 4 Gy (p less than 0.001), but there was no difference in complete response (no pain) rates at 4 weeks or duration of response between the two arms. It is concluded that 8 Gy gives a higher probability of pain relief than 4 Gy, but that 4 Gy can be an effective alternative in situations of reduced tolerance. Treatment of the symptoms of bone metastases currently involves the use of narcotic medication, radiation therapy, or hormonal therapy. Pamidronate disodium, a bisphosphonate, may prove helpful in the palliative treatment of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer as demonstrated in this multicenter, dose-ranging trial.
                Ambulatory female patients age 18 years or older with breast cancer metastatic to bone and a life expectancy of at least 3 months were eligible for the study. Bone metastases were confirmed by bone scan or bone survey within 6 months of enrollment. Sixty-one patients were treated as outpatients and were randomized to receive one of four intravenous pamidronate regimens for 12 weeks: 30 mg administered every 2 weeks, 60 mg every 4 weeks, 60 mg every 2 weeks, or 90 mg every 4 weeks. The primary efficacy parameter for this study was pain score. The change from baseline in pain score was determined for each patient at each study visit and at endpoint, defined as the last postbaseline evaluation for each patient before or at week 12. Secondary efficacy variables included narcotic scores, urinary calcium/creatinine and hydroxyproline/creatinine ratios, serum osteocalcin and bone alkaline phosphatase concentrations, and bone lesion (radiologic) response.
                At 3 months, the regimens of 60 mg every 4 weeks, 60 mg every 2 weeks, and 90 mg every 4 weeks resulted in significant reduction in bone pain beginning by week 6 of treatment. The regimen of 30 mg every 2 weeks was not effective. Narcotic use, as reflected by narcotic scores, did not parallel the pain scores, because there was little evidence of any effect for any of the treatment groups. Reduction in bone pain was accompanied by decreases in urinary calcium/creatinine and hydroxyproline/creatinine ratios, and bone alkaline phosphatase concentrations. Side effects of pamidronate were mild and transient. Radiographic changes consistent with healing of lytic lesions were observed in 15 patients (25%).
                Intravenous pamidronate is a well tolerated treatment that produced significant relief of bone pain in the majority of patients with metastatic breast cancer at the three highest doses tested. Painful bone metastases are most frequent in patients with advanced prostate or breast carcinoma. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of radionuclide therapy using Sr and Sm-EDTMP in patients with painful bone metastases of these tumours.
                One hundred patients treated with radionuclide bone palliation therapy were analysed. The study population consisted of 60 male patients with advanced prostate carcinoma and 40 female patients with advanced breast carcinoma. Fifty patients (30 men and 20 women) were treated with Sr (150 MBq). The other 50 patients were treated with Sm-EDTMP (37 MBq x kg). The treatment efficacy was evaluated by a visual analogue scale (VAS), Karnofsky performance scale, and dosage of analgesic drugs used.
                Complete pain relief was found in 40% of women and 40% of men treated using Sm-EDTMP and in 25% of women and 33% of men treated with Sr. No analgesic effect occurred in 20% of patients. A better analgesic effect was found in cases of osteoblastic metastases compared to mixed metastases. Statistically significant reduction of pain intensity, use of analgesic drugs and improvement of performance in Karnofsky scale was found in cases of both radionuclides.
                The analgesic effects of Sr and Sm-EDTMP was similar in both prostate and breast carcinoma. However, the effect was dependent on the type of metastases; better response was observed in cases of osteoblastic metastases than in patients with mixed metastases. Severe adverse reactions after this therapy were rare.
Radiotherapy is clearly effective at reducing pain from painful bone metastases. There was no evidence of any difference in efficacy between different fractionation schedules, nor indeed of a dose-response with total dose of radiation. For treatment of generalised bone pain both hemibody irradiation and radioisotopes can reduce the number of painful new sites.