Sublingual misoprostol before first trimester abortion: a comparative study using two dose regimens. Mifepristone versus vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical priming before first-trimester termination of pregnancy: a randomized, controlled study. Cervical preparation using laminaria with adjunctive buccal misoprostol before second-trimester dilation and evacuation procedures: a randomized clinical trial. Prostaglandin E2 gel versus misoprostol for cervical ripening in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 34 weeks. Cervical priming with sublingual misoprostol vs. 15-methyl-prostaglandin F2alpha prior to surgical abortion.
Various methods have been described for preoperative cervical priming prior to vacuum aspiration (VA) in first trimester pregnancy termination, to facilitate cervical dilatation and shorten the abortion procedure. Recently misoprostol a prostaglandin E1 analogue has been shown to be effective in facilitating cervical dilatation prior to VA. Misoprostol offers several advantages over the other prostagland in analogues including stability at room temperature, ease of administration and minimal side effects.
                To determine the optimal dosage and dosing interval for the use of misoprostol administered sublingually for pre-abortion cervical dilatation.
                This was a prospective randomised study conducted at Comprehensive Rural Health Project, Ballabgarh the rural health centre under Centre for Community Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi.
                One hundred and twenty pregnant women between 6-11 weeks of gestation opting for voluntary medical termination of pregnancy were (MTP) randomly allocated to either 200 microg or the 400 microg misoprostol group. Vacuum aspiration was performed either two or three hours after administration of sublingual misoprostol. Using Hegar's dilators, degree of cervical dilatation before vacuum aspiration was measured. Other parameters assessed included the amount of additional dilatation required, intra-operative blood loss and associated side effects.
                Statistical analysis was conducted using chisquare, the student's t and the Mann-Whitney U tests to examine the difference between the two groups.
                In the 200 microg misoprostol group 33% achieved a dilatation of > or = 8 mm compared with 71% of women in the 400 microg misoprostol group. The odds ratio was 95.8 (95% CI 10.2-842.9) for 400 microg misoprostol for successful preoperative cervical dilatation of > or = 8 mm. The mean baseline cervical dilatation for 400 microg and 200 microg misoprostol was 8.2 mm and 6.0 mm respectively (P < 0.001). The use of 400 mg misoprostol with an evacuation interval of two hours appears to be the optimal dosage and evacuation interval. Increasing the time interval beyond two hours did not confer any additional advantage on the rate of successful cervical dilatation but was instead associated with an increased incidence of side effects such as preoperative vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain and shivering.
                Our study has shown that Sublingual administration of 400 microg of misoprostol at least two hours before procedure is effective for preoperative cervical dilatation before vacuum aspiration in first trimester pregnancy termination. There is no additional advantages of increasing the dosing interval upto three hours. This study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of mifepristone orally administered at 24 or 48 hours before first-trimester vacuum aspiration abortion with that of vaginally administered misoprostol as a cervical priming agent.
                In a randomized comparative trial 90 women who requested surgical termination of pregnancy were randomly assigned to receive 200 mg mifepristone orally 24 or 48 hours before the operation or 800 microg misoprostol vaginally 2 to 4 hours before the operation. The main outcome measures were baseline cervical dilatation, cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 9 mm, and intraoperative blood loss.
                The baseline cervical dilatation was significantly greater among women who received mifepristone 48 hours before the operation (P =.02). This group also required the least mechanical force to dilate the cervix (P =.06). There were no significant differences among the 3 groups in the intraoperative blood loss, in the operating time, or in patient acceptability. Side effects such as hot flushes and headaches were significantly higher among women who received mifepristone 24 or 48 hours before the operation than among those who received misoprostol (P =.01 and P =. 002, respectively).
                Mifepristone is an effective cervical priming agent when orally administered 48 hours before vacuum aspiration for termination of first-trimester pregnancy. Because of its cost and availability in comparison with misoprostol, however, selective use may have to be considered. This study was undertaken to determine whether buccal misoprostol improves cervical preparation achieved with laminaria before second-trimester dilation and evacuation procedures.
                A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of preoperative cervical preparation with overnight laminaria and either buccal placebo or 400 microg buccal misoprostol approximately 90 minutes before second-trimester surgical abortion. Block randomization was used to provide balanced enrollment into 2 separate gestational age study groups: early (13-15(6/7)) and mid (16-20(6/7)) second trimester. Surgeons tested maximal cervical dilation by inserting the largest dilator that could be passed through the cervical os without force. Subject demographics and preprocedure symptoms were tracked.
                Groups were similar in regard to age, gravity, parity, delivery type, and gestational age. Data were analyzed from 125 women in the 13 to 15(6/7) (30 misoprostol, 32 placebo) and 16 to 20(6/7) (31 misoprostol, 32 placebo) gestational age groups. Overall, misoprostol treatment did not improve the initial mean dilation achieved with laminaria alone in either the 13 to 15(6/7) (46.0 fr +/- 5.0; placebo 45.0 fr +/- 6.2, P = .68) or 16 to 20(6/7) (50.9 fr +/- 5.6, placebo 48.9 fr +/- 5.2, P = .16) groups. However, a subanalysis of gestations 19 weeks or more demonstrated significantly greater dilation in the misoprostol group (53.6 fr fr +/- 5.3, placebo 48.5 fr +/- 5.0, P = .01). Subjects receiving misoprostol reported significantly more cramping than those receiving placebo (13-15(6/7) weeks misoprostol 25/30, 83%; placebo 17/32, 53%, P = .02; 16-20(6/7) week misoprostol 25/31, 81%, placebo 16/32, 50%, P = .02).
                Cervical dilation with laminaria is augmented by 400 microg buccal misoprostol in gestations 19 weeks or more, but not in earlier gestations. Misoprostol causes more abdominal cramping. To compare intravaginal misoprostol to prostaglandin (PG) E2 for cervical ripening in women with premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) after 34 weeks of gestation.
                Women with PROM after 34 weeks of gestation and an unripe cervix were randomized to receive PGE2 (2.5 mg) or misoprostol (50 microg). Both agents were placed intravaginally immediately after randomization, and the dose was repeated 6 hours later if necessary. After another 6 hours from the second insertion, oxytocin treatment was started if labor had not begun. Forty patients in each group were required to show a 30% improvement in delivery within 12 hours in the misoprostol group.
                One hundred nine patients were randomized; 54 were assigned to misoprostol and 55 to PGE2. Important demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the groups. The mean time from first insertion to delivery was 16.4 hours in the misoprostol group and 22.0 hours in the PGE2 group. A second dose was required less frequently in the misoprostol group (22% vs 62% in the PGE2 group), and the percentage of patients delivered within 12 hours was higher in the misoprostol group (41% vs 16%). Tachysystole occurred in 20% and 6% of women in the misoprostol and PGE2 groups, respectively. Hyperstimulation occurred in 9% and 0%, and cesarean delivery in 19% and 26% of women in the misoprostol and PGE2 groups, respectively. Neonatal outcome was similar between groups.
                Intravaginal misoprostol is more effective than local PGE2 application to treat PROM after 34 weeks of gestation, but tachysystole occurs more commonly with misoprostol. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of sublingual misoprostol with those of intramuscular 15-methyl-prostaglandin F2alpha (15-M-PG F2alpha) for cervical dilation prior to vacuum aspiration (VA) in first-trimester pregnancy termination.
                Sixty pregnant women requesting pregnancy termination between the 9th and 12th week were randomized to receive 400 microg of sublingual misoprostol or an intramuscular injection of 125 microg of 15-M-PG F2alpha 2 h prior to vacuum aspiration. Baseline cervical dilation prior to vacuum aspiration was measured using Hegar's dilators. Other variables assessed included procedure duration, intraoperative blood loss, and associated adverse effects. Patient acceptability was assessed by questionnaires completed at the time of discharge from the hospital.
                Mean cervical dilation at vacuum aspiration was significantly greater in the misoprostol group than in the 15-M-PG F2alpha group (8.8 vs. 7.6 mm; P<0.01), and preoperative adverse effects were significantly less frequent in the sublingual misoprostol group (P<0.05). However, procedure duration and intraoperative blood loss were similar in both groups. The acceptability rates were 93.3% in the sublingual misoprostol group and 76.6% in the 15-M-PG F2alpha group, respectively; however, 6.6% patients in the sublingual misoprostol group thought that the tablets had an unpleasant taste.
                Sublingual misoprostol appears to be an effective alternative to intramuscular 15-M-PG F2alpha for cervical dilation prior to vacuum aspiration in first trimester pregnancy. In addition, misoprostol is inexpensive and convenient to use and has higher patient acceptability rates.
Cervical preparation with osmotic dilators and/or misoprostol before second-trimester D&E is safe and effective. Osmotic dilators appear to provide superior cervical dilation when compared to prostaglandins alone or when combined with prostaglandins, however this difference in cervical dilation does not appear to result in differences in procedure time or complication rates. There does not appear to be clear clinical benefit from two days of cervical preparation compared to one-day prior to second-trimester D&E below 19 weeks gestational duration. Mifepristone plus misoprostol was associated with high rates of pre-procedural expulsions and does not appear to be a useful method of cervical preparation before second-trimester dilation and evacuation. Same-day procedures appear to be a safe and reasonable option in the early second trimester, however, more research is needed to assess the effectiveness and safety of same-day procedures in the later second trimester.