Long-term treatment of nocturnal enuresis with desmopressin intranasal spray. Evidence against a synergistic effect of desmopressin with conditioning in the treatment of nocturnal enuresis. Comparing alarms, desmopressin, and combined treatment in Chinese enuretic children. Combined treatment with enuresis alarm and desmopressin for nocturnal enuresis. Desmopressin in nocturnal enuresis. Desmopressin acetate in children with severe primary nocturnal enuresis. [Treatment of isolated nocturnal enuresis: alarm or desmopressin?]. [Results of a therapeutic strategy against monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis]. Desmopressin in nocturnal enuresis. Desmopressin response of enuretic children. Effects of age and frequency of enuresis. Comparison of intranasal and oral desmopressin for nocturnal enuresis. Prospective randomized trial using laser acupuncture versus desmopressin in the treatment of nocturnal enuresis. The efficacy and safety of oral desmopressin in children with primary nocturnal enuresis. A controlled trial of desmopressin and behavioral therapy for nocturnal enuresis. Desmopressin tablets in the treatment of severe nocturnal enuresis in adolescents. Efficacy of desmopressin combined with alarm therapy for monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis. Desmopressin in the management of nocturnal enuresis in children: a double-blind study. Desmopressin resistant enuresis: pathogenetic and therapeutic considerations. Oral desmopressin: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled study of effectiveness in children with primary nocturnal enuresis. Response to desmopressin as a function of urine osmolality in the treatment of monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis: a double-blind prospective study. Comparison of desmopressin and enuresis alarm for nocturnal enuresis. Efficacy and safety of oral desmopressin in the treatment of primary nocturnal enuresis in Asian children. A comparison of amitriptyline, vasopressin and amitriptyline with vasopressin in nocturnal enuresis. Comparison of effects of treatment of primary nocturnal enuresis with oxybutynin plus desmopressin, desmopressin alone or imipramine alone: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Reduced REM latency predicts response to tricyclic medication in depressed outpatients. Treatment with desmopressin in severe nocturnal enuresis in childhood. Oral desmopressin as a new treatment modality for primary nocturnal enuresis in adolescents and adults: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study. Dutch Enuresis Study Group. Combination therapy with desmopressin and an anticholinergic medication for nonresponders to desmopressin for monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Randomized prospective study of early discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs in children with epilepsy. The late prognosis of epilepsy in childhood: results of a prospective follow-up study. Combined therapy of enuresis alarm and desmopressin in the treatment of nocturnal enuresis. Nocturnal enuresis: a placebo controlled trial of two antidepressant drugs. Behavioral interventions for childhood nocturnal enuresis: the differential effect of bladder capacity on treatment progress and outcome. Rectally administered diclofenac (Voltaren) reduces vomiting compared with opioid (morphine) after strabismus surgery in children. Cognitive-behavioral therapy to prevent relapse in pediatric responders to pharmacotherapy for major depressive disorder. Desmopressin has an influence on the arousability of children with primary nocturnal enuresis. A comparison of two approaches to the treatment of nocturnal enuresis and the prediction of effectiveness using pre-treatment variables. Bright light therapy stabilizes the antidepressant effect of partial sleep deprivation. An experimental intervention with families of substance abusers: one-year follow-up of the focus on families project. Antiemetic therapy for chemotherapy-induced vomiting: metoclopramide, benztropine, dexamethasone, and lorazepam regimen compared with chlorpromazine alone.
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment of nocturnal enuresis with desmopressin intranasal spray. Sixty-five children with primary nocturnal enuresis with a mean age of 11.3 years (range 7-17) underwent a 2-week observation period followed by dose titration period of 1 week. Those children completely dry with desmopressin entered a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase lasting 2 weeks, followed by a 6-month open treatment. The enuretic status of the children was documented for 2 weeks after the treatment was stopped. Eleven children had no change from baseline wetting with desmopressin. Thirty-two children receiving 20 mg and 9 children with 40 mg desmopressin were completely dry. Thirteen children were wet 1-2 nights per week, which was better than in the pretreatment period. During the 6-month open-treatment period, the effect of desmopressin was found to be stable. No side effects or adverse reactions were encountered. Two weeks after the treatment was stopped, 25 children were still completely dry (38% of the initial study population, 50% of the responders). The cure rate appeared to continue beyond 18 months after discontinuation of the treatment. To test the hypothesis that desmopressin facilitates acquisition of continence, we aimed to establish whether, in children with nocturnal enuresis who are desmopressin nonresponders, adjunct desmopressin increases the rate of sustained continence after treatment with a conditioning alarm. Study design Patients with nocturnal enuresis (n=358; age range, 6-16 years) completed a 4-week "run-in" course of intranasal desmopressin (20-40 microg). Of these, 207 defined as nonresponders (<50% reduction in wet nights) were randomly assigned to receive either desmopressin (n=101) or placebo (n=106) nasal spray, together with conditioning alarm therapy for 8 weeks. Principal outcome measures were remission (28 continuous dry nights) and relapse (>2 wet nights in 2 weeks after having achieved remission).
                Remission rates were similar in both groups (51.5% desmopressin, 48.1% placebo; 95% CI on difference, -10%, 17%; P=.63), and relapse rates were not significantly different (13.5% vs 5.9%; 95% CI on difference, -3.7%, 19%; P=.19). Although remission rates were similar, children treated with desmopressin had significantly more dry nights during treatment than those in the placebo group.
                Desmopressin did not act synergistically with alarm treatment to achieve remission. Therefore, we infer that in partial or nonresponders, desmopressin does not enhance learning. The objective of this multicenter randomized controlled trial was to compare the efficacy of enuresis alarms, oral desmopressin, and combined treatment in Chinese children with monosymptomatic primary nocturnal enuresis. We assigned 105 children aged 7-15 years to receive alarms (group 1, 35 patients), oral desmopressin 400 mug (group 2, 38 patients), or combined therapy (group 3, 32 patients) for 12 weeks; patients were then followed for 12 weeks after treatment. The wetting frequency decreased during treatment by 46%, 52%, and 73% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In groups 2 and 3, but not in group 1, there was rebound post treatment, but significant improvements persisted at 12 weeks. The complete and partial response rates were 22.9% and 20%, respectively in group 1, 42% and 10.5% in group 2, and 62.5% and 15.6% in group 3. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, group 1 had a significantly poorer response than groups 2 and 3. Of the responders, 20%, 60%, and 40% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, relapsed after stopping treatment. In conclusion, enuresis alarms and/or oral desmopressin were less efficacious in Chinese than in Western societies. Desmopressin produced an immediate effect but relapses were common. Alarms took several weeks to produce a benefit, which was persistent on follow-up. Seventy-one children with nocturnal enuresis were enrolled in a controlled trial. The children were allocated to two matched groups. Children in both groups used an enuresis alarm until the end of treatment. Children in the first group were treated with 40 micrograms of intranasal desmopressin (Desmospray) for up to 6 weeks at the start of treatment with the alarm. During the observation period treatment there were 2.3 dry nights per week in both groups. At the end of treatment there was a significant difference in the mean number of dry nights per week between the two groups (6.3 in the alarm and desmopressin group and 4.8 in the alarm group) and also in the number of children becoming reliably dry. The combination of desmopressin and alarm was particularly helpful for children with severe wetting and those with family and behavioural problems. The effect of intranasal desmopressin on primary nocturnal enuresis was investigated in a study divided into 2 parts in which the first part was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study of 52 Finnish school children 5 to 13 years old. A variety of approaches had previously been attempted in most children, including water deprivation, night awakenings, enuresis alarm and imipramine, without success. The patients were randomized to 4 periods of 3 weeks each: 2 periods on placebo and 2 periods on 20 micrograms. desmopressin spray. The entire 12-week treatment period was preceded and followed by control periods (without treatment). The number of dry nights, measured as calculated averages per week, increased significantly (p less than 0.01) from 0.6 dry nights during pre-treatment to 4.3 and 4.6 dry nights per week during the 2 desmopressin treatment periods, respectively. The placebo responses were 2.1 and 2.4 dry nights per week, respectively. The second part of the study was an open dose-finding and drug safety study of a further 3 months in duration. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of 20, 30 and 40 micrograms. doses. All 47 patients who relapsed during the post-treatment period in part 1 were included. During this period 53% of the patients responded fully, 19% were intermediate responders and 28% did not respond. As reported in other studies most patients suffered relapse after treatment. During continued treatment for 3 months at doses between 20 and 40 micrograms. desmopressin was well tolerated, had no effect on body weight or blood pressure and did not cause any adverse reactions. Desmopressin acetate, a synthetic antidiuretic drug, was evaluated in two US multicenter studies involving a total of 176 children with severe primary nocturnal enuresis. Patients who qualified during the screening period, entered a double-blind treatment phase during which they received 20 micrograms or 40 micrograms of desmopressin acetate or placebo at bedtime for four weeks. This phase was followed by a four-week open-label period, during which all patients received 20 or 40 micrograms of desmopressin acetate. In both studies, children given desmopressin acetate had significantly fewer wet nights after two and four weeks of therapy than did children given placebo. During the open-label period, patients crossed over from placebo to desmopressin acetate showed similar reductions in enuresis. Global evaluations by the patients, their parents, or the investigators further confirmed the good results with desmopressin acetate. No serious adverse experiences were reported. Thus the results of these studies corroborate previously published reports of the efficacy and safety of desmopressin acetate in the treatment of primary nocturnal enuresis. Monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis is common in healthy school children. Treatment is often required because of social and psychological convenience. We therefore conducted a randomized prospective trial using either desmopressin (D) or alarm (A).
                Patients (n = 135) aged 6 to 16 years were enrolled between January 1992 and December 1994. Desmopressin (Minirin spray, Ferring SA) was given intranasally at a dose of 20 micrograms at bedtime and increased to 40 micrograms after 2 weeks if partial result was obtained. The alarm was a pad-bell device (Wet-stop, Sega) and the sound source was attached to the upper part of the pajamas. Inclusion criteria were: primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis in healthy children, age > or = 6 years, absence of previous treatment using either desmopressin or alarm. The aim of the treatment was to achieve 100% dry nights. Patients were evaluated after 15 days on therapy by phone call and thereafter by attending the outpatient clinic at 2-3 and 4-6 months. At the time of the second evaluation, a switch from alarm to desmopressin (or vice-versa) was proposed to those who did not respond to the initial treatment.
                In group D (n = 62), only 27 children were included since 12 (19%) were switched to alarm and 23 (37%) were excluded because they were either non-compliant or lost to follow-up. In group A (n = 73), only 31 were included since six (8%) were switched to desmopressin and 36 (49%) were excluded for the same reasons as in group D. Prior to inclusion, the percentage of dry nights was 21% in group D and 14% in group A. After 15 days on therapy, patients from group D achieved 80% dry nights compared to 50% in group A (P = 0.001). After 3 months, patients from group D attained 85% dry nights vs 90% in group A. After 6 months, children from group A achieved 94% dry nights vs 78% in group D (P = 0.01).
                Desmopressin offers better short-term results than enuresis alarm but the latter is significantly more efficient in the long term. In France, the alarm device is not reimbursed by the national health service and therefore is poorly accepted, as suggested from the high rate of patients lost to follow-up. There are many therapeutic options against enuresis.
                To evaluate several therapies introduced progressively to treat monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis.
                Eighty-four patients, aged 6 to 14 years old, were studied. The 67 year olds were treated with desmopressin and oxybutynin was added in nonresponders. If enuresis persisted, Alarm was given. Children over 7 years of age were randomly divided and treated with Alarm or Alarm plus desmopressin. Nonresponders were treated with desmopressin alone.
                In children aged 6-7 years the cumulative response was 72%. Those who wetted themselves less responded to desmopressin. In children over 7 years of age, response to Alarm was 73.3% and response to Alarm plus desmopressin was 58.6%. In nonresponders the cumulative response after desmopressin treatment increased to 80% and 62% respectively.
                In the group of 6 to 7 year-olds desmopressin was indicated as first line therapy. Treatment efficacy was increased by adding oxybutynin especially in the children who wetted themselves the most. In children over 7 years of age Alarm was the most effective treatment and relapses were fewer. No advantages were observed with the combination of Alarm and desmopressin in our protocol. The response of desamino-D-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP) was investigated in 32 enuretic children in a double-blind clinical study. The 15 children treated with DDAVP showed a significant reduction in the incidence of bed wetting--from 18.7 +/- 6.5 to 6.5 +/- 9.2 wet nights per 30 days. In 6 children bed wetting stopped entirely, in 6 there was a satisfactory response, and in 3 the response was marginal or there was none. When DDAVP was stopped most children reverted to their earlier bedwetting habits (15.7 +/- 8.9 nights a month). Response to DDAVP was significantly better in children aged more than 10 years (mean age for the entire group). The administration of DDAVP was not associated with any appreciable change in morning urine osmolalities. No adverse effects were noted. It is concluded that DDAVP is effective in nocturnal enuresis, particularly in older children. It is suggested that the cessation of bed wetting may, in part, reflect functional properties of DDAVP rather than antidiuresis. To characterize the children with enuresis likely to respond to desmopressin acetate, we performed a double-blind crossover study that included the use of a placebo. During the two weeks of desmopressin administration, six children (12%) had 13 or 14 dry nights, and 15 children (29%) had eight to 12 dry nights. Among the 17 children aged 9 years or older, with four to seven dry nights during the two-week baseline period, 12 children (71%) responded to desmopressin (eight to 14 dry nights). In contrast, none of the 15 children younger than 9 years of age with fewer than three dry nights before therapy responded. During the posttreatment period, only four of the 21 drug responders reported a persistent effect. Desmopressin may be effective in reducing the frequency of enuresis, especially in children older than 9 years of age without nightly enuresis. A single blind dose response study of the effects of treatment with tablets containing 50-400 micrograms of desmopressin was conducted in 15 children with primary nocturnal enuresis. A dose response effect was seen, with the 100, 200, and 400 micrograms doses resulting in significantly more dry nights than when a placebo was used. The response after 200 micrograms was significantly different from that after 100 micrograms (p less than 0.02) but not from that after 400 micrograms. A randomised, double blind, double dummy, cross over study was then carried out in 30 children to compare the effects of a 20 micrograms dose given through a nasal pipette, a 200 micrograms tablet, and a placebo. The numbers of dry nights were significantly greater during both periods of treatment with desmopressin when compared with that using placebo, but there were no differences between the methods of taking the drug. After oral and nasal treatment 41% and 52%, respectively, of the patients improved by more than 50%. Nine children (31%) remained completely dry after treatment. Several treatment modalities for children suffering from monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis are available, but desmopressin is a well-established option. On the other hand, alternative nonpharmacological therapies such as laser acupuncture are more frequently requested by the parents. To our knowledge, there is no prospective randomized trial which evaluated the efficacy of such an alternative approach in comparison with the widespread use of desmopressin.
                Forty children aged over 5 years presenting with primary nocturnal enuresis underwent a previous evaluation of their voiding function to assure normal voiding patterns and a high nighttime urine production. Then the children were randomized into two groups: group A children were treated with desmopressin alone, and group B children underwent laser acupuncture. All children were investigated after a minimum follow-up period of 6 month to evaluate the duration of the response.
                The children of both groups had an initial mean frequency of 5.5 wet nights per week. After a minimum follow-up period of 6 months reevaluation revealed a complete success rate of 75% in the desmopressin-treated group. Additional 10% of the children had a reduction of their wet nights of more than 50%. On the other hand, 6 months after laser acupuncture, 65% of the randomized children were completely dry. Another 10% had a reduction of the enuresis frequency of more than 50% per week. 20% of the children in the desmopressin-treated group did not respond at all as compared with 15% in the acupuncture-treated group. Statistical evaluation revealed no significant differences among the response rates in both groups.
                Im comparison with pharmacological therapy using desmopressin, our study shows that laser acupuncture should be taken into account as an alternative, noninvasive, painless, cost-effective, and short-term therapy for children with primary nocturnal enuresis in case of a normal bladder function and high nighttime urine production. Success rates indicated no statistically significant differences between the well-established desmopressin therapy and the alternative laser acupuncture. We confirmed findings that oral desmopressin safely decreases the number of wet nights in children with enuresis and identified doses at which acceptable responses can be obtained.
                We evaluated the safety and efficacy of oral desmopressin in a double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group, randomized, multicenter trial of 193 children 6 to 16 years old with documented primary nocturnal enuresis. The study was conducted in 2 phases: 1) a 2-week dose ranging phase in which children received desmopressin (0.2, 0.4 or 0.6 mg.) or placebo at bedtime and 2) an 8-week dose titration phase that followed a 2-week placebo washout. Patients received 0.2 mg. desmopressin or placebo for the first 2 weeks and then the dose was increased in 0.2 mg. increments at 2-week intervals until the patient was completely dry or was receiving 0.6 mg. Patients were instructed to limit fluid intake. Mean decrease from baseline in the number of wet nights, percentage of responding patients and safety were assessed at 2-week intervals.
                There was a statistically significant linear response to oral desmopressin at doses from 0.2 to 0.6 mg. during the dose ranging phase (p < or =0.05). The decrease in wet nights after 2 weeks of treatment with desmopressin was 27%, 30% and 40% at 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 mg. doses, respectively, compared to 10% with placebo. All doses were statistically significantly different from placebo (p < or =0.05). During the dose titration phase all placebo treated and 87% of desmopressin treated patients were receiving the maximum dose of 3 tablets nightly because they had not been completely dry in the previous 2 weeks. Nevertheless, 44% of desmopressin treated patients had achieved at least a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of wet nights per 2 weeks at the lower doses of 0.2 and 0.4 mg. Most adverse events (rhinitis, pharyngitis, headache and increased cough) were mild to moderate in severity, unrelated to treatment and resolved before the study was completed.
                Oral desmopressin administered at bedtime to children with primary nocturnal enuresis was significantly better than placebo for decreasing episodes of bed-wetting (p <0.05). A linear dose-response relationship was observed (p <0.05). An acceptable response to treatment (50% or greater reduction from baseline in wet nights per 2 weeks) was seen at all doses of desmopressin. Oral desmopressin, up to 0.6 mg. for 8 weeks, was well tolerated. The combination of desmopressin (DDAVP) and behavioral therapy for treatment of nocturnal enuresis was compared with use of each of these modes alone. We randomly assigned 226 enuretic children being treated in primary care clinics of a major medical center in the largest health maintenance organization in Israel into 3 groups: Group A) DDAVP plus behavioral therapy (double-blind); Group B) behavioral therapy plus placebo (double-blind); and Group C) DDAVP alone (open group). DDAVP (20 micrograms/naris) and placebo were administered by intranasal spray. Both pharmacologic and behavioral therapy were initiated after a 2-week observation period and continued for 8 weeks. All patients were followed for 2 months after completion of treatment. A significant reduction in the number of wet nights/week was registered for all 3 groups: 49% in Group A, 45% in Group B, and 19% in Group C. After controlling for confounding factors, no significant difference in effect was noted among the 3 types of treatment during the trial period. However, on follow-up the results for the DDAVP patients were significantly less stable compared with the other 2 groups (p = 0.015). Minor side effects were registered, but none of the participants withdrew from the trial. To our knowledge, this is the largest randomized trial of nocturnal enuresis conducted to date. Our findings suggest that simply discussing the problem with the patient and family leads to improvement, and that behavioral therapy is also beneficial. DDAVP can help, but the relapse rate on discontinuation is high. In recent years the treatment of primary nocturnal enuresis (PNE) with desmopressin (DDAVP) has been promising. The route of administration until now had been intranasal, but because the tablets were introduced for the treatment of diabetes insipidus they have also become available for the treatment of PNE.
                To find the optimal dosage of desmopressin tablets and to compare desmopressin's efficacy with placebo in a group of adolescents with severe monosymptomatic enuresis. The long-term safety of desmopressin was also studied in the same group of patients.
                The effect of oral desmopressin (1-deamino-8-D-arginine-vasopressin) (DDAVP tablets, Minirin) was investigated in 25 adolescents (ages 11 to 21 years) with severe monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis. The first part of the dose-ranging study comprised a single-blind dose titration period, followed by a double-blind, crossover efficacy period comparing desmopressin with placebo. The final part was an open long-term study consisting of two 12-week treatment periods. The efficacy of the drug was measured in reductions of the number of wet nights per week.
                During the first dose-titration period, the majority of the patients were given desmopressin 400 micrograms, and the number of wet nights decreased from a mean of 4.9 to 2.8. During the double-blind period, a significant reduction of wet nights was observed (1.8 vs 4.1 for placebo). During the two long-term periods, 48% and 53% of the patients could be classified as responders (0 to 1 wet night per week) and 22% and 23.5% as intermediate responders (2 to 3 wet nights per week). No weight gain was observed due to water retention. After cessation of the drug, 44% of the patients had a significant decrease in the number of wet nights.
                Oral desmopressin has a clinically significant effect on patients with PNE, and therapy is safe when administered as long-term treatment. We evaluated the combination of alarm and desmopressin versus alarm monotherapy for the treatment of nocturnal enuresis.
                A double-blind, placebo controlled study of alarm therapy combined with desmopressin for children with nocturnal enuresis is described. Of 93 patients 47 were randomized to receive alarm therapy and 40 microg. intranasal desmopressin for 3 weeks followed by 20 microg. desmopressin for 3 weeks (group 1) and 46 received alarm therapy and placebo (group 2). After 6 weeks on alarm therapy and medication or placebo, both groups received an additional 3 weeks of alarm monotherapy. A specialized nurse practitioner advised patients and families of the treatment to be given at home and in the outpatient department. Bed-wetting frequency was evaluated before during and 2 weeks and 6 months after treatment.
                A significantly greater reduction in the number of wet nights was observed after the first 3 weeks of treatment in group 1. However, after long-term followup no significant differences in bed-wetting frequency were noted.
                There is a temporary, positive effect on enuresis using desmopressin combined with alarm therapy. However, both treatment modalities have a low long-term success rate of 36% to 37%. Desmopressin (1-desamino-[8-D-Arg]-vasopressin) (DDAVP) was given by nose drops to 22 children with persistent nocturnal enuresis (mean age, 6.6 +/- 2.9 years; range, 4 to 12 years) the evening before sleep. With saline alone as placebo and with comparison to enuretic frequency before the onset of the trial, fortnightly periods were compared under double-blind conditions with the children at home. Pretreatment and placebo fortnights showed wetting frequencies (nights per fortnight) of 10.6 +/- 4.9 and 11.0 +/- 4.4, respectively. The value of the fortnight during desmopressin therapy was 4.2 +/- 4.5, which was significantly different from either of the previous means (P less than .01). Of the 22 subjects, four failed to react to therapy at all. There was decreased enuretic frequency in the remaining 18, of whom 12 decreased markedly or ceased wetting. One month after the trial, seven of the respondents were dry with desmopressin therapy. There was clear evidence of a large nocturnal volume of dilute urine before treatment in six of the respondents in whom such measurements could be reliably made. These children responded to dehydration with urine concentration, however, so that the suggestion can be made that a failure to develop a normal diurnal pattern of urine volume and concentration may underly some cases of enuresis. We tested the role of the bladder in the pathogenesis of desmopressin resistant enuresis by evaluating the influence of urine production on the timing of the enuretic event and the response to anticholinergic medication.
                We gave 33 children with monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis resistant to the standard 0.4 mg. oral dose of desmopressin 0.4 and 0.8 mg. desmopressin and placebo tablets for 5 nights each in a double-blind crossover fashion. The time of enuresis or nocturia was documented. All 9 children who had at least 1 dry treatment period during the randomized portion of the study then received open label treatment with 0.8 mg. desmopressin. Nonresponders to this regimen and the remainder of the children were offered anticholinergic treatment.
                Average time between bedtime and voiding was 5.0, 5.6 and 5.0 hours during the nights with placebo, and 0.4 and 0.8 mg. desmopressin, respectively (p = 0.12). Of the 9 children subsequently treated with 0.8 mg. desmopressin 5 became completely dry. Of the remaining 28 children given anticholinergic treatment 20 responded.
                Antidiuresis does not delay the enuretic event in children with desmopressin resistant enuresis. This finding and the favorable response to anticholinergic medication favor the hypothesis that these children have nocturnal bladder instability. A subgroup of enuretic children responds to high but not normal doses of desmopressin. Desmopressin nasal spray has proved to be efficacious treatment of primary nocturnal enuresis. Oral desmopressin tablets would be a more easily used, convenient vehicle for our patients and their parents. We evaluated the effectiveness of oral desmopressin in decreasing the number of wet nights in patients with primary nocturnal enuresis.
                We performed a double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group trial of oral desmopressin in 141 children 5 to 17 years old with documented primary nocturnal enuresis at 14 sites. Patients were screened for number of wet nights for 2 weeks before study entry. A minimum of 3 wet nights weekly for 2 consecutive weeks was required for study entry. Patients were randomized to receive 200, 400 or 600 mcg. desmopressin or placebo before bedtime. Fluids were restricted 2 hours before bedtime based on body weight. The primary efficacy variable was mean decrease in the number of wet nights recorded during the last 2-week treatment period. The percentage of responding patients and mean decrease from baseline in number of wet nights at 2, 4 and 6 weeks were also assessed.
                The decrease in wet nights was 9, 20, 30 and 36% for placebo, and 200, 400, and 600 mcg. desmopressin orally per day, respectively. The 600 mcg. dose of oral desmopressin daily was statistically significantly different (p < 0.05) from placebo in decreasing wet nights. A complete or near complete response (0 to 2 wet nights) was noted in 3, 18, 33 and 24% of the patients who received placebo, and 200, 400 and 600 mcg. oral desmopressin daily, respectively. The 400 and 600 mcg. treatment groups were statistically significantly different (p < 0.05) from placebo. A less than 50% decrease in wet nights was noted in 83, 79, 64 and 61% of the patients who received placebo, and 200, 400 and 600 mcg. oral desmopressin daily, respectively. Oral desmopressin exhibited a dose response in the treatment of primary nocturnal enuresis. The linear trend for the decrease in wet nights was statistically significant (p < 0.05).
                A dose of 600 mcg. oral desmopressin daily significantly decreased the mean number of wet nights when administered for 6 weeks. A higher dose may be necessary for an improved response. To determine if urine osmolality parameters can predict whether children with primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis will respond to desmopressin, we conducted a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 96 children 8 to 14 years old. Following a 2-week baseline screening interval patients with at least 6 of 14 net nights were randomized to double-blind regimens of desmopressin or placebo. Urine specimens for osmolality were collected at 6 p.m. and 6 a.m. on 3 consecutive days during the baseline and the 2, 14-day treatment periods. A significantly greater proportion of desmopressin treated children had an excellent (2 or fewer wet nights in 14 days) or good (greater than 50% reduction in wet nights) response compared with placebo treated children (p = 0.004 and p = 0.002 for treatment periods 1 and 2, respectively). Children treated with desmopressin reported a significantly lower number of wet nights than placebo treated children during both treatment periods (p = 0.0258 and p = 0.0136, respectively). Children treated with desmopressin had a significantly higher 6 a.m. urine osmolality during both treatment periods and a higher 6 a.m.-to-6 p.m. osmolality ratio (p = 0.004) in the first treatment period compared with the placebo group. Within the desmopressin treatment group clinical responders had a higher 6 a.m. urine osmolality and 6 a.m.-to-6 p.m. urine osmolality ratio than nonresponders during both treatment periods but these differences did not achieve statistical significance. In conclusion, treatment with desmopressin is associated with a significant decrease in the number of wet nights, and a significant increase in nocturnal urine osmolality and nocturnal/diurnal urine osmolality ratios. However, clinical response was not predictable based on baseline or treatment osmolality parameters. Fifty children with primary nocturnal enuresis were randomised for a study comparing desmopressin (DDAVP) and enuresis alarm. Forty six completed the trial, 24 of whom were treated with 20 micrograms intranasal desmopressin nightly and 22 with enuresis alarm for three months. Failures were crossed over and relapses were continued on the same treatment for a further three months. The improvement rate was 70% in the group given desmopressin and 86% in the group treated with alarm; the difference was not significant. During the first week of treatment the group given desmopressin was significantly dryer, and at the end of the study 10 of these patients relapsed compared with one patient in the group given the alarm. No serious side effects were observed. This study confirms the role of conditioning treatment as preferable in long term treatment of nocturnal enuresis. When this fails or when a safe drug with rapid effect is needed, however, desmopressin is a useful alternative. To determine the efficacy and safety of oral desmopressin (DDAVP) treatment in Asian children with nocturnal enuresis.
                This was a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled double-blind cross-over study. Patients were randomized to either active treatment with oral 400 mg DDAVP or placebo, with a 2-week medication-free period between the cross-over. Children with primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis, aged between 7 and 18 years, with a minimum frequency of wetting of 6 nights or more during a 2-week observation period were recruited. Efficacy was measured by reduction in the average number of wet nights per week.
                Of the 37 children initially recruited, the outcomes for 34 children were included in the final cross-over analysis, as they had complete data for both the treatment periods. Statistical analysis by ANOVA showed that there was no significant difference between the medication-free period and the pretreatment period. However, the average number of wet nights per week for the DDAVP treatment period (2.5+/-2.7) was significantly lower than that of the placebo treatment period (4.5+/-2.1) (P < 0.0001). In terms of the safety profile, there was no significant change in bodyweight, blood pressure, serum sodium, serum osmolality, and urine osmolality following DDAVP treatment.
                Oral DDAVP is a safe and efficacious drug for the short-term treatment of children with primary nocturnal enuresis. Forty-five children aged 6-14 years with primary nocturnal enuresis were randomised to determine whether desmopressin is more effective than amitriptyline and whether the combination of amitriptyline/desmopressin is more effective than amitriptyline or desmopressin alone. Amitriptyline dosage was 25 mg for children 6-10 years and 50 mg for children aged 10-14 years. Desmopressin (20 micrograms) was given in the same dosage for all age groups. After a run-in period of 2 weeks, children were treated for 16 weeks and then observed for 12 weeks. In the amitriptyline group mean wet nights per week decreased from 5.8 +/- 0.9 to 3.3 +/- 1.9 (P < 0.0005); in the desmopressin group mean wet nights per week decreased from 6.0 +/- 0.9 to 4.7 +/- 1.7 (P < 0.02); in the amitriptyline/desmopressin group mean wet nights per week decreased from 6.3 +/- 0.9 to 3.3 +/- 2.5 (P < 0.0006). When comparing the groups, amitriptyline/desmopressin and amitriptyline were statistically more effective than desmopressin in week 6 (P < 0.009), week 8 (P < 0.03) and week 10 (P < 0.04). No significant side effects occurred. At this dose amitriptyline was more effective than desmopressin and the combination of desmopressin and amitriptyline did not confer any additional benefit. We prospectively evaluated the efficacy of a combination of desmopressin and oxybutynin for treating children with nocturnal enuresis, compared to the single drugs imipramine and desmopressin.
                We enrolled 158 patients from 2003 to 2004. Children were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups and treated with desmopressin, imipramine or a combination of desmopressin plus oxybutynin. Of these patients 145 (100 boys and 45 girls, mean age 7.8 +/- 2.5 years, range 5 to 15) were followed for more than 6 months. Efficacy was measured at 1, 3 and 6 months in terms of average enuretic frequency, 5-scale response based on change in nocturnal enuretic frequency after treatment and posttreatment enuretic frequency as a percentage of pretreatment baseline frequency. The latter efficacy was classified according to daytime voiding symptoms. Statistical evaluation was performed using chi-square tests and ANOVA.
                Of the 145 children followed 48 received combination therapy, 49 received desmopressin and 48 received imipramine. A total of 68 patients (47%) had monosymptomatic enuresis and 77 (53%) had polysymptomatic enuresis. Combination therapy produced the best and most rapid results regardless of whether the children had monosymptomatic or polysymptomatic enuresis.
                Combination therapy with desmopressin plus oxybutynin for the treatment of pediatric nocturnal enuresis was well tolerated, and gave significantly faster and more cost-effective results than single drug therapy using either desmopressin or imipramine. Forty-two outpatients with major depressive disorder entered a double-blind, randomized trial of either desipramine or amitriptyline for a minimum of 6 weeks. Pretreatment polysomnographic and clinical measures were used to predict response. Response was defined as a 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score less than or equal to 9 at the end of treatment. There was a 61.1% response rate for patients treated with amitriptyline and a 66.7% response rate for patients treated with desipramine. Reduced REM latency (2-night mean less than or equal to 65.0 min) predicted a positive response to these tricyclic antidepressants. REM latency did not differentiate between desipramine or amitriptyline responders. More patients with reduced REM latency (80%) responded to treatment compared with patients with nonreduced REM latency (50%). The 80% response rate in reduced REM latency depressed patients confirms our previous findings in a mixed inpatient and outpatient sample. Contrary to our hypothesis, in this sample, endogenous depression was not associated with a good response to tricyclic medication. A series of 22 patients with severe nocturnal enuresis were treated with desmopressin in a randomised double-blind cross-over study. Treatment with 20 and 40 micrograms was highly effective compared with placebo. No difference in dry nights was found between the 2 dosages. Desmopressin proved to be a safe and effective treatment. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 2 oral doses of desmopressin compared to 20 micrograms. nasal spray and baseline values in the treatment of primary nocturnal enuresis.
                A multicenter study was done comparing oral dosages (200 and 400 micrograms.) of desmopressin (4-week, randomized, double-blind phase followed by 12 weeks of open label treatment with 400 micrograms.) to 20 micrograms. nasal spray in 66 adults and adolescents 12 to 45 years old with primary nocturnal enuresis.
                No significant differences were found between the 2 doses of desmopressin tablets or between the tablets and 20 micrograms. nasal spray during the double-blind phase. However, patients who initially received 200 micrograms. desmopressin tablets experienced fewer wet nights after they completed 12 weeks of open label treatment when the dose was escalated to 400 micrograms. tablets. Those who received 400 micrograms. tablets initially maintained response during this phase. Desmopressin tablets were well tolerated at both dose levels: 96% of patients and 94% of physicians rated the tolerability as excellent.
                Desmopressin tablets are an effective and safe alternative for treatment of nocturnal enuresis. Desmopressin is an approved medical therapy for the treatment of monosymptomatic primary nocturnal enuresis. In cases of limited response to desmopressin, we have added anticholinergic therapy to desmopressin (combination therapy). To evaluate this treatment strategy, we examined the efficacy of combination therapy for primary nocturnal enuresis in desmopressin-nonresponders.
                Only patients with primary nocturnal enuresis refractory to the maximal dosage of desmopressin were enrolled. Children with lower urinary tract symptoms or bowel dysfunction were excluded, on the basis of a 3-day, 24-hour, frequency-volume chart and elimination record. Children continued to take desmopressin and were assigned randomly, in a double-blind manner, to receive either extended-release anticholinergic medication or placebo. Patients were reassessed after 1 month of therapy, with a 1-week nocturnal record.
                Forty-one desmopressin-nonresponders were enrolled, and 7 patients were excluded because of noncompliance. The treatment groups were equally matched with respect to age, gender, functional bladder capacity, and number of wet nights per week. After 1 month of treatment, there was a significant reduction in the mean number of wet nights in the combination therapy group, compared with the placebo group. With a generalized estimating equation approach, there was a significant 66% decrease in the risk of a wet episode, compared with the placebo group.
                This study represents the first prospective, placebo-controlled trial examining the effect of desmopressin in combination with long-acting, anticholinergic, bladder-relaxing therapy for monosymptomatic primary nocturnal enuresis. We studied recurrence rate, risk factors for recurrence, and outcome after recurrence in children after early withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). One hundred sixty-one children with newly diagnosed epilepsy who had become seizure free within 2 months after starting treatment and remained so for 6 months were randomly assigned to immediate withdrawal of AEDs (n = 78) or continuation of treatment for another 6 months followed by withdrawal (n = 83). The probability of remaining seizure free at 24 months after randomization was 51% (95% CI, 40 to 62) in Group A and 52% (41 to 63) in Group B. Significant predictive factors for relapse were partial epilepsy, seizure onset at 12 years or older, defined etiology, and epileptiform EEG before randomization. At the end of follow-up (median, 41.9 months), 129 children (80.6%) had a terminal remission of at least 1 year, 88 without AEDs and 41 with AEDs. No significant difference in outcome was found between Groups A and B. In children with epilepsy and an early response to therapy, AED withdrawal after 6 or 12 months of treatment leads to seizure recurrence in approximately half of all patients regardless of the duration of therapy. More than 60% of those with one or more recurrences reach a terminal remission of at least 1 year after long-term follow-up with or without AEDs. By means of a prospective study, relapse after discontinuation of antiepileptic drug treatment in 433 children with epilepsy and 40 patients who were treated after the first seizure was investigated. Independent of the electroencephalographic findings, the age of the patients, and other factors, the antiepileptic drugs were reduced during 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after 2, 3, and 4 seizure-free years; and in children with absences after 1, 2, 3, and 4 seizure-free years. The observation period after stopping therapy was at least 3 (on average, 5-6) years. In 157 of 433 children (36.3%) and 5 of 40 patients (12.5%), relapses occurred during this time. More than half (61.8%) of the relapses occurred during the withdrawal period or within 3 months: altogether, 86% within 1 year after discontinuation of therapy. Eighty-six percent of these patients again became free from seizures on administration of the original therapy. The dependence on predictive factors of the rate of relapse was tested by multivariate statistical analysis. There was a pronounced significant dependence on the duration of the seizure-free period, the duration of the withdrawal period, the length of illness, the frequency and duration of seizures, and the presence of paroxysmal activity in the EEG at the start of the discontinuation of antiepileptic drug treatment. The stopping of therapy during the pubertal period did not present a higher risk. Twenty-eight children with primary nocturnal enuresis were blindly allocated at random to a combination of enuresis alarm and 20 micrograms intranasal desmopressin or alarm and placebo for 2 weeks. Patients received the other therapy after a 2-week treatment-free period. The combined treatment of desmopressin and alarm showed 5.1 +/- 0.4 (mean +/- SEM) dry nights per week and resulted in significantly more dry nights per week during the 2 weeks of observation than placebo and alarm (4.1 +/- 0.4, P less than 0.05). A multicentre, randomised, double blind treatment trial was set up comparing imipramine (a tricyclic antidepressant with anticholinergic action), mianserin (a quadricyclic antidepressant without anticholinergic activity), and placebo, (a) possibly to identify an effective alternative drug and (b) to elucidate the action of imipramine in enuretic children. Eighty children (65 boys, 15 girls) aged 5-13 years, wet three or more nights a week, were studied. Exclusions were a urinary tract infection or abnormality, other organic illness, or severe emotional disorders. After a four week assessment, 25 children were randomised to eight weeks' treatment with imipramine 25 mg, 26 to mianserin 10 mg and 29 to placebo, followed by four weeks without treatment. Dry nights and a wetness score were recorded throughout. During treatment, imipramine was superior to both placebo and mianserin (p < 0.001) in achieving dry nights and reducing wetness scores. It led to a definite improvement in 72% of children. Mianserin produced a mildly beneficial effect that was not superior to placebo. No side effects were recorded. Mianserin would not be a satisfactory alternative treatment for nocturnal enuresis. The efficacy of imipramine is unlikely to be the result of its antidepressant activity. Study participants were fifty 5- to 13-year-old children (33 boys and 17 girls) with nocturnal enuresis of at least 3 months duration. All wet their beds at least twice per week, were of normal intelligence, and were without demonstrable organic cause for their enuresis. Each youngster's pretreatment maximum functional bladder capacity (MFBC) was used to classify the child as having small or large MFBC based on available norms. Youngsters were then randomly assigned to treatment with the urine alarm (UA) alone or with the urine alarm supplemented with retention control training (UA plus RCT). Of the 40 youngsters who completed treatment, 37 (92.5%) achieved the treatment goal of 14 consecutive dry nights. Two additional children became dry during follow-up, leaving only one child who failed to stop wetting. Sixteen children (41%) subsequently relapsed, but all who reentered treatment became dry. Because treatment outcome was uniformly excellent across all groups, treatment progress was evaluated by analyzing wetting frequency and arising at night to use the bathroom during treatment, as well as prechange and postchange in MFBC For both wetting frequency and arising at night, there was a significant interaction between bladder capacity and treatment. Small MFBC children treated with the UA plus RCT and large MFBC youngsters treated with the UA alone had the fewest wetting episodes and got up at night to use the bathroom less often; these youngsters took less time to be successfully treated. Prechanges and postchanges in MFBC indicated that RCT did not lead to consistent increases in bladder capacity in the sample studies. The 10 children who terminated treatment prematurely had lower self-esteem and more parent-reported conduct problems than the 40 children who completed treatment. Nausea, vomiting and pain are common complications after strabismus surgery in children. Diclofenac, a non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug, is widely used to treat acute and chronic pain but there are few reports of its use given rectally in children undergoing strabismus surgery. This open randomised study was designed to investigate the analgesic and anti-emetic properties of rectally administered diclofenac compared with opioid (morphine) given i.v. in connection with strabismus surgery in children.
                After obtaining approval from the local ethics committee and written informed consent from the parents, 50 ASA class I-II children, 4-16 years of age, were randomised to receive either rectally administered diclofenac (Voltaren) 1 mg/kg or i.v. opioid (morphine) 0.05 mg/kg perioperatively. The children were consecutively operated upon from May 1999 to January 2001. Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl and propofol and maintained with propofol. Nitrous oxide was omitted. The postoperative pain was assessed after arrival at the post anaesthesia care unit (PACU) by using the validated Wong and Baker scale (FACES) Pain Rating Scale. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was assessed by measuring the frequency of vomiting and the degree of nausea.
                In the diclofenac group the incidence of PONV during the first 24 h was 12% (of which one child had severe vomiting). The incidence of PONV was much higher, 72% (P = 0.0000), in the morphine group, where 56% of the children also had severe vomiting. There were no difference in pain score between the two groups. Recovery time at the PACU was longer (P < 0.002) and the postoperative analgesic requirement higher in the morphine group (10 vs. 5 children). No children needed overnight admission to the hospital.
                Diclofenac given rectally is an effective analgesic for this kind of surgery and gives less postoperative nausea than i.v. morphine. No serious adverse events were observed. We present results of a feasibility test of a sequential treatment strategy using continuation phase cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to prevent relapse in youths with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have responded to acute phase pharmacotherapy.
                Forty-six youths (ages 11-18 years) who had responded to 12 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine were randomized to receive either 6 months of continued antidepressant medication management (MM) or antidepressant MM plus relapse prevention CBT (MM+CBT). Primary outcome was time to relapse, defined as a Childhood Depression Rating Scale-Revised score of 40 or higher and 2 weeks of symptom worsening or clinical deterioration warranting alteration of treatment to prevent full relapse.
                Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for depression severity at randomization and for the hazard of relapsing by age across the trial, revealed that participants in the MM treatment group had a significantly greater risk for relapse than those in the MM+CBT treatment group (hazard ratio = 8.80; 95% confidence interval 1.01-76.89; chi = 3.86, p =.049) during 6 months of continuation treatment. In addition, patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the MM+CBT group. No differences were found between the two treatment groups on attrition rate, serious adverse events, and overall global functioning.
                These preliminary results suggest that continuation phase CBT reduces the risk for relapse by eightfold compared with pharmacotherapy responders who received antidepressant medication alone during the 6-month continuation phase. Several studies provide evidence regarding the effect of desmopressin (DDAVP) on the sleep of adults. Therefore, we investigate whether this effect has a role in children with primary nocturnal enuresis treated intranasally with DDAVP.
                A prospective, randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, crossover study was performed. Patients were assigned to 2 groups by lottery. Arousability was determined by a special bell apparatus with an adjustable sound pressure level. The wet nights per week and the results of the arousal tests were compared using the signed rank test.
                A total of 20 children with primary nocturnal enuresis 6 to 15 years old were enrolled in the study, 2 of whom had to be excluded. There were no marked differences in age or weight between the groups. The number of wet nights per week decreased significantly with DDAVP treatment. Moreover 14 patients slept more soundly with DDAVP and only 4 were more difficult to awake after the medication. This difference was significant.
                This study revealed an effect of DDAVP on arousability of enuretic children as well as its previously known action for the treatment of primary nocturnal enuresis. This result is consistent with the known action of DDAVP on sleep of elderly adults. It suggests that the cause of primary nocturnal enuresis lies in the structure of sleep of the affected patients. This study compared the effectiveness of the enuresis alarm alone with a brief version of Dry Bed Training in treating 74 enuretic children. Both procedures were equally effective, and in the total sample a better response to treatment was predicted by the child's report of being teased by siblings. Maternal anger was associated with a greater drop-out rate. Partial sleep deprivation (PSD) results in a pronounced decrease of depressive symptoms in the majority of patients with major depressive disorder. Generally this acute antidepressant effect is not stable, relapse usually occurs after one night of recovery sleep. We therefore studied whether light therapy, beginning in the morning after PSD, is able to prevent the relapse after sleep deprivation, using a controlled, balanced, parallel design. All patients received an antidepressant medication, which was kept constant before and during the study period. Fourteen of 20 patients (70%) showed a reduction of at least 40% in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) in the morning after PSD and were classified as PSD responders. Responders as well as nonresponders were randomly assigned to receive either bright light (BL/3000 lux) or dim light (DL/100 lux) therapy during the following 6 days after PSD. In the responder group BL therapy prevented significantly (p = 0.005) the relapse after the next night of sleep and prolonged significantly (p = 0.011) the antidepressant effects of PSD up to 7 days. In contrast, patients in the DL condition relapsed after the recovery night and showed no further improvement of the depressive syndrome after 1 week of DL therapy. PSD nonresponders did not benefit from light treatment. These findings indicate that BL therapy might be efficacious to prevent relapse after PSD. Children whose parents abuse drugs are exposed to numerous factors that increase the likelihood of future drug abuse. Despite this heightened risk, few experimental tests of prevention programs with this population have been reported. This article examines whether intensive family-focused interventions with methadone treated parents can reduce parents' drug use and prevent children's initiation of drug use.
                Parents were assigned randomly into intervention and control conditions and assessed at baseline, post-test, and 6 and 12 months following the intervention. Children were assessed at baseline, and 6- and 12-month follow-up points.
                Two methadone clinics in Seattle, Washington.
                One hundred and forty-four methadone-treated parents, and their children (n = 178) ranging in age from 3 to 14 years old.
                The experimental intervention supplemented methadone treatment with 33 sessions of family training combined with 9 months of home-based case management. Families in the control condition received no supplemental services.
                Parent measures included: relapse and problem-solving skills, self-report measures of family management practices, deviant peer networks, domestic conflict and drug use. Child measures included self-report measures of rules, family attachment, parental involvement, school attachment and misbehavior, negative peers, substance use and delinquency.
                One year after the family skills training, results indicate significant positive changes among parents, especially in the areas of parent skills, parent drug use, deviant peers and family management. Few changes were noted in children's behavior or attitudes.
                Programs such as this may be an important adjunct to treatment programs, helping to strengthen family bonding and to reduce parents' drug use. Twenty-six children aged 4 to 15 years who were to receive cancer chemotherapy were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial that compared the antiemetic efficacy of a four-drug regimen (the MBDL regimen: metoclopramide, 8 mg/kg; benztropine, 0.04 mg/kg; dexamethasone, 0.7 mg/kg; lorazepam, 0.1 mg/kg), given over 24 hours, with the efficacy of chlorpromazine, 3.3 mg/kg, given in four doses over 24 hours. The MBDL regimen was more effective than chlorpromazine in both objective and subjective measures of antiemetic control. Of 26 children, 23 (89%) had less vomiting on the MBDL regimen, and 20 (77%) of 26 patients or parents preferred this regimen (p less than 0.01). The MBDL regimen reduced the number of vomiting episodes by a mean of 4.0 (p less than 0.01) and reduced the duration of vomiting by a mean of 3.7 hours (p less than 0.01). A moderate level of sedation was documented at some stage in the 24-hour period of observation in 27% on the MBDL regimen and in 35% receiving chlorpromazine. Dystonia was seen in 1 (4%) of 26 children. We conclude that the MBDL regimen is safe in children and more effective than chlorpromazine.
Although tricyclics and desmopressin are effective in reducing the number of wet nights while taking the drugs, most children relapse after stopping active treatment. In contrast, only half the children relapse after alarm treatment. Parents should be warned of the potentially serious adverse effects of tricyclic overdose when choosing treatment. Further research is needed into comparisons between drug and behavioural or complementary treatments, and should include relapse rates after treatment is finished.