Effect of steroid therapy on exercise performance in patients with irreversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The use of the 12 minute walking test in assessing the effect of oral steroid therapy in patients with chronic airways obstruction. Steroid response in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Peak flow monitoring for guided self-management in childhood asthma: a randomized controlled trial. Predictive value and utility of oral steroid testing for treatment of COPD in primary care: the COOPT study. The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in the management of non asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction. Composite spirometric-computed tomography outcome measure in early cystic fibrosis lung disease. Use of intravenous pulsed cyclophosphamide in severe, generalized myasthenia gravis. The response to inhaled and oral steroids in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Many patients with irreversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) claim symptomatic improvement with steroid therapy, despite a lack of objective improvement in their spirometric data. To determine if steroids actually increase the exercise capacity of these individuals, 13 clinically stable patients (mean age, 63 +/- 4 years; 12 male patients) were given methylprednisolone (32 mg once daily) or placebo in a randomized double-blind crossover fashion. Spirometric data and minute ventilation, oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production, and heart rate during incremental exercise were measured at each visit. Methylprednisolone did not produce a significant change in any of the measured parameters. Three patients had an increase in maximal VO2 of greater than 2 ml/kg/min during therapy with methylprednisolone, while two experienced a decline in maximal VO2 of similar magnitude. The change in exercise capacity was unrelated to the change in the forced expiratory volume in one second in individual patients (r = 0.08). We conclude that in the absence of any improvement in the usual tests of airway mechanics, steroid therapy does not improve exercise performance in patients with COPD. The reproducibility of the 12 minute walking distance (12 MD) was assessed in ten men with chronic airways obstruction, and the 12 MD was used, together with spirometry, transfer factor and three subjective assessments of breathlessness to evaluate the effects on respiratory function of prednisone 30 mg daily given orally in double-blind placebo-controlled fashion for two weeks. Like others, we found the 12 MD reproducible on a single day with a mean variation of 3.1%. Tests performed two weeks apart showed greater variability ranging from 0.2% to 30.9%, (mean 9.1%). During placebo and prednisone therapy the 12 MD and assessments of breathlessness correlated significantly with each other and with TLCO, but not with spirometry. Following steroid therapy there was a significant increase in mean TLCO but no significant change in 12 MD, spirometry or subjective assessments. Changes in 12 MD and TLCO correlated significantly with each other and with changes in subjective assessments. Changes in FEV1 correlated with changes in breathlessness, and also with variability in FEV1 while receiving placebo. Individuals with the greatest changes in 12 MD and FEV1 were those with the greatest variability on placebo. The variability of the 12 MD and FEV1 should be measured in individuals before using these tests to assess response to steroid therapy. We compared a 2-week course of 32 mg/d methylprednisolone with placebo in a double-blind crossover trial in 46 well-characterized patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Placebo and steroid trials were separated by 2 weeks when no tablets were given. Response was assessed by measuring forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1.0). Placebo responses were normally distributed (mean, 0.8% change in FEV1.0; range, -30% to 33%). Six patients showed a greater than 50% increase of FEV1.0 in response to steroid; a seventh showed a 36% increase and an eighth, a 29% increase. Because of these patients the group as a whole showed a significantly greater FEV1.0 after steroid than after placebo. The eight steroid responders did not differ from nonresponders in age, sex, smoking history, or duration and intensity of symptoms including wheeze. Baseline lung function and eosinophilia of blood or sputum did not differ between the two groups. Patients who responded to steroids also responded to inhaled beta agonists: Acute bronchodilator response averaged 25% in steroid responders and 13% in nonresponders, a difference that was statistically significant although there was overlap between the two groups. We asked whether the addition of PEF recordings to a symptom-based self-management plan improved outcome in school children with asthma. In an open-randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial, we studied children aged 7-14 years with moderate asthma. After a 4-week run-in, 90 children were randomized to receive either PEF plus symptom-based management or symptom-based management alone for 12 weeks. Thresholds for action based on PEF were 70% of best (for increasing inhaled steroids) and 50% of best (for commencing prednisolone). Children were asked to perform twice-daily spirometry at home (using an electronic recording spirometer that revealed only PEF to the study group alone) and to record a symptom diary. The mean daily symptom score was the main outcome. There were no differences between groups in mean symptom score or in spirometric lung function, PEF, quality of life score, or reported use of health services over 12 weeks. During acute episodes, children responded to changes in symptoms by increasing their inhaled steroids at a mean value of PEF of greater than 70% of best so that overall PEF did not contribute to this important self-management decision. Knowledge of PEF did not enhance self-management even during acute exacerbations. The oral prednisolone test is widely used to distinguish chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients who might benefit from inhaled steroid treatment. Previous studies used selected patient groups that did not represent the large COPD population in primary care.
                The study included smokers and exsmokers with chronic bronchitis or COPD from primary care, who underwent prednisolone testing (30 mg for 14 days) before randomization in a three-year follow-up randomized controlled trial (COOPT Study). Spirometry was performed before and after the test. Responders and nonresponders were classified according to international criteria. Effectiveness of inhaled fluticasone relative to placebo was compared in terms of health status (Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire), exacerbations, and postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)), using repeated measurement analysis.
                Two hundred eighty-six patients recruited from 44 primary care practices were randomized. Nine percent to 16% of the COPD population was classified as responder, depending on the international guideline criteria used. On average, responders did not reach the minimum clinically important difference in health status (0.29 points/year, P = 0.05), although a borderline significant effect of inhaled fluticasone was noted. Possible clinically relevant reductions in exacerbation rate (rate ratio 0.67) and FEV(1) decline (39 mL/year) occurred in responders, but did not reach statistical significance.
                Oral steroid testing identifies a limited proportion of COPD patients, but does not reveal any clinically relevant benefit from inhaled steroid treatment on health status. No significant effects on exacerbation rate and lung function decline occurred. The aims of this investigation were to evaluate the efficacy of regular inhaled beclomethasone in the control of symptoms and lung function with non-asthmatic smoking related obstructive pulmonary disease and to evaluate the relationship between clinical responses to a short course of oral prednisone and longer term outcomes using inhaled steroid.
                The study was a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover investigation in 18 patients. The active treatment was inhaled beclomethasone 1000 micrograms given twice daily for three months by metered dose inhaler. At the end of each treatment period, patients received oral prednisone 30 mg/day for ten days. The two treatment phases were separated by a one month washout interval. Peak flow rates, symptom scores and "rescue" bronchodilator use were recorded twice daily. Lung function (FEV1, FVC and lung volumes) and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PC20 methacholine) were measured at monthly visits. The number of exacerbations requiring intervention therapy were also recorded.
                There were no consistent benefits attributable to beclomethasone. Lung function was not significantly better as a result of active treatment. Sputum production improved but other symptom scores were similar during active and placebo therapy. Three patients exhibited an increase in FEV1 of 15% or more during active treatment but did not do so when oral prednisone was administered immediately after the period of placebo treatment. A further three patients showed an improvement in FEV1 of 15% or more with oral prednisone but failed to improve during treatment with inhaled beclomethasone. The predictive value of the "trial of steroid" was 0% and 81.3% for positive and negative outcomes respectively.
                Our results indicate that in non-asthmatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease inhaled corticosteroid fails to achieve significant improvements in either lung function or symptoms. The response to a "trial of steroid" using oral prednisone is not clinically helpful in selecting the small number of patients who may subsequently benefit from this form of therapy. With the advent of therapies aimed at young patients with cystic fibrosis, who have mildly reduced pulmonary function, the need for improved outcome measures that discriminate treatment effects has become important. Pulmonary function measurements or chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scores have been separately used to assess interventions. We evaluated these modalities separately and together during a treatment study to develop a more sensitive outcome measure. In a 1-year trial, 25 children randomized either to daily Pulmozyme or to normal saline aerosol were evaluated at randomization and at 3 and 12 months. Outcome variables were pulmonary function test (PFT) results, a global HRCT score, and a composite score incorporating PFTs and HRCT scoring. Regression analyses with generalized estimating equations permitted estimation of the difference in treatment effect between groups over time for each outcome. The largest difference in treatment effects observed at 12 months, measured by the percentage change from baseline, were with the composite total and maximal CT/PFT scores (35.4 and 30.4%), compared with mean forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC (FEF25-75%) (13.0%) and total and maximal global HRCT scores (6.2%, 7.2%). The composite total and maximal CT/PFT scores were the most sensitive outcome measures for discriminating a treatment effect in children with cystic fibrosis with normal or mildly reduced pulmonary function during a 1-year trial of Pulmozyme. Twenty-three myasthenia gravis (MG) subjects, mean (SD) age 41.6 years (14), showing poor disease control or steroid-related side effects, received treatment for 12 months with intravenous cyclophosphamide (CP; n = 12) or placebo (PL; n = 11) in a randomized, double-blind trial. Pulses were given monthly at an initial dose of 500 mg/m(2) of body surface, and titrated according to changes of peripheral muscle strength or side effects. Changes of muscle strength, steroid and pyridostigmine requirements, and development of ventilatory failure or swallowing impairment were evaluated at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months. No differences were observed between groups at baseline. Statistically significant reductions of methylprednisone doses were noted in both groups but were more pronounced in subjects receiving CP than PL at 6 months (P < 0.05) and at 12 months (P < 0.03). At 12 months, five subjects on CP had tapered off their steroids whereas no subject on PL achieved further reductions (P < 0.03). Four CP subjects were not receiving steroids 36 months after completing the study and three other CP subjects had stopped pyridostigmine. CP improved muscle strength at 3 and 6 months, and this reached statistical significance compared to PL at 12 months mainly in the bulbar and masticatory (P < 0.009) and extraocular muscles (P < 0.03). Ventilatory failure was noted in one subject on CP (due to bronchopneumonia) and two on PL (due to muscle weakness). No significant increases of CP-related side effects were observed. Thus, this study suggests that intravenous pulses of CP allow reductions of systemic steroids usage without muscle strength deterioration or CP-related side effects.
                Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. A significant minority of patients with COPD have favourable response to corticosteroid treatment. In addition, the benefit of corticosteroid treatment may be outweighed by the side-effects. Long-term administration of inhaled steroids is a safe means of treatment. However, only a few studies have addressed the role of inhaled steroids in patients with COPD, with conflicting results.
                Forty-four patients with stable COPD were defined as 'responders to bronchodilators' (increase in FEV1 > or = 20% following administration of beta 2-agonist) (group A), and 124 as 'non-responders to bronchodilators' (group B). All patients were randomized to receive a 6-week course of either a daily dose of 800 micrograms of inhaled budesonide or placebo, separated by 4 weeks when no medication was taken; were randomized again to receive a 6-week course of either 1600 micrograms day-1 of inhaled budesonide, or 800 micrograms day-1 of inhaled budesonide plus placebo; and were randomized once again to receive a 6-week course of either 40 mg day-1 of prednisone or placebo. All stages were performed in a double-blind cross-over design.
                Following administration of 800 micrograms day-1 of inhaled budesonide, there was an increase in the mean FEV1 from 1.40 +/- 0.20 to 1.92 +/- 0.22 L (P < 0.001) and a significant decrease in inhaled beta 2 agonist consumption in group A. These changes remained almost stable during the increased dose of inhaled budesonide or during prednisone treatment. The mean FEV1 did not change during the placebo period, or in group B in either treatments.
                Treatment with inhaled steroids improved spirometry data and inhaled beta 2-agonist consumption in about one-quarter of patients with stable COPD, and this rate increased to about three-quarters in patients who responded to beta 2-agonist inhalation. There was no additional benefit in using a higher dose of inhaled budesonide or prednisone.
Oral steroids improved the chest X-ray and a global score of CXR, symptoms and spirometry over 3-24 months. However, there is little evidence of an improvement in lung function. There are limited data beyond two years to indicate whether oral steroids have any modifying effect on long-term disease progression. Oral steroids may be of benefit for patients with Stage 2 and 3 disease with moderate to severe or progressive symptoms or CXR changes.