Psychosocial rehabilitation of gynecologic oncology patients. Coping and communication-enhancing intervention versus supportive counseling for women diagnosed with gynecological cancers. Effect of individual psychological intervention in Chinese women with gynecologic malignancy: a randomized controlled trial. The effect of a clinical nurse specialist in gynaecological oncology on quality of life and sexuality.
This investigation studied the effectiveness of in-hospital, individual counseling on the psychosocial adjustment of patients with newly diagnosed gynecologic malignancies. Levels of psychologic distress, sexual functioning, and return to employment were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months after counseling. The counseled patients were compared with a similar control group that was assessed but not counseled. In this study, levels of psychologic distress reported by cancer patients were similar to those reported in normal populations. However, at 3 months post-treatment, counseled cancer patients reported significantly less confusion and contradiction within areas of self-perception than did the noncounseled patients. Return to employment and sexual activities were both shown to be adversely affected by the diagnosis and treatment of genital cancer. Results suggested that counseling had a positive effect in enhancing return to normal vocational and sexual functions during the 1st year after treatment. This study compared the efficacy of 2 psychological interventions, a coping and communication-enhancing intervention (CCI) and supportive counseling (SC), in reducing depressive symptoms and cancer-specific distress of women diagnosed with gynecological cancer. Demographic, medical, and psychological moderators of intervention effects were evaluated. Three hundred fifty-three women with gynecological cancer were randomly assigned to 7 sessions of CCI, 7 sessions of SC, or usual care. Intent-to-treat growth curve analyses indicated that participants assigned to CCI and SC reported lower depressive symptoms than participants assigned to usual care at the 6- and 9-month follow-ups. Women with greater than average increases in physician-rated physical symptoms and/or women who were more expressive of positive emotions benefited more from SC than women with lower than average increases in symptom scores and/or women who were less expressive of positive emotions. These findings suggest that both interventions may be effective in treating depressive symptoms among patients with gynecological cancer. Future research should evaluate whether bolstering both psychological interventions with additional intervention sessions and topics in the disease trajectory will result in persistent long-term effects. To evaluate the effectiveness of psychological intervention in the care of cancer patients and to determine whether routine use of individual psychological therapies is indicated.
                Patients with newly diagnosed gynecologic malignancies from August 1999 to November 2000 were recruited and randomly assigned to either a control group receiving routine medical care or to an intervention group receiving individual psychotherapy. A set of fixed-choice, self-report questionnaires assessing the patients' psychological status, quality of life, and their perceptions related to the medical consultations was completed at recruitment and then every 3 months for 18 months. Data analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle by fitting the data into a linear mixed-effects model. Multivariable analyses were performed to examine the effects of confounding factors.
                One hundred fifty-five patients participated in the trial. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups at baseline. There was a trend toward better quality of life and functional status and also improvement of the symptoms over time for both groups. No differences were found between the groups in the scores measured by any of the instruments at baseline and at any time points after the cancer diagnosis. Psychological intervention had no significant effects on the psychosocial parameters.
                Routine use of psychological therapies as given in our format has no significant effect on the patients' quality of life and psychological status. Gynaecological malignancy has an immense impact on the well-being of women. For many women, however, treatment such as surgery is curative and healthcare intervention focuses on the physiological status of the women. The psychological, social and sexual consequences of the malignancy and its treatment have received little attention in research or in practice. The present study used a mixed quantitative and qualitative design to analyse a specialist nurse intervention (including psychosexual intervention), and to explain the impact of the illness on women's lives. The qualitative arm of the study collected interview data from 20 women and six partners. The randomized controlled trial sample consisted of 36 women, with data collected using a quality of life measure (the EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Lasry Sexual Functioning scale. This paper focuses on the randomized controlled trial data, which identified that sexual functioning and quality of life were improved in the active group who received specialist psychosexual counselling. However, the validity of the sexual functioning scale is challenged by the qualitative results of the study, which emphasize the social meaning of sexuality.
There is no convincing evidence to support the use of any interventions for psychosexual dysfunction in women treated for gynaecological cancer. There is a need for more studies of high methodological quality.