A randomized study of tiotropium Respimat Soft Mist inhaler vs. ipratropium pMDI in COPD. Improved delivery of ipratropium bromide using Respimat (a new soft mist inhaler) compared with a conventional metered dose inhaler: cumulative dose response study in patients with COPD. Clickhaler (a novel dry powder inhaler) provides similar bronchodilation to pressurized metered-dose inhaler, even at low flow rates.
The aim of these studies was to compare the efficacy and the safety of tiotropium, delivered via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI), a novel multi-dose, propellant-free inhaler, with ipratropium pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Two identical, 12-week, multi-national, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled studies were performed. COPD patients were randomized to treatment with either inhaled tiotropium (5 or 10 microg) via Respimat SMI administered once daily, ipratropium (36 microg) pMDI QID or placebo. The primary endpoint was the mean trough forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) response after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included other spirometry measures and rescue medication use. A total of 719 patients were randomized; the majority were male (69%) with a mean pre-bronchodilator FEV(1) (% predicted) of 40.7%. The mean treatment differences between tiotropium 5 and 10 microg and placebo for the primary endpoint (mean trough FEV(1) response at week 12) were 0.118 and 0.149L, respectively (both P<0.0001). Treatment differences between tiotropium 5 and 10 microg and ipratropium were 0.064L (P=0.006) and 0.095L (P<0.0001). The increases in peak FEV(1), FEV(1) AUC((0-6h)) and FVC for both tiotropium doses were statistically superior to placebo (P<0.01) and higher than ipratropium. All active treatments significantly reduced the rescue medication use compared with placebo, but only tiotropium 10 microg was statistically superior to ipratropium (P=0.04). The incidence of adverse events was comparable across groups. In conclusion, tiotropium 5 and 10 microg daily, delivered via Respimat SMI, significantly improved lung function compared with ipratropium pMDI and placebo. Respimat (RMT) is a reusable, propellant-free, soft mist inhaler (SMI), a novel device for inhalation therapy. We conducted a three-period cross-over study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cumulative doses of ipratropium bromide inhaled from RMT (Two dose levels) or from a pressurized metered dose inhaler (MDI), in 36 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The bronchodilator effect of ipratropium bromide was greater when administered via RMT (10 or 20 microg per puff, given double-blind within device, to total doses of 160 or 320 microg) than via MDI (20 microg per puff, total dose 320 microg). The bronchodilator effects of the 160 and 320 microg doses delivered via RMT were similar. Cumulative ipratropium bromide doses of 320 microg given via MDI or RMT and 160 microg given via RMT produced similar safety profiles. Between 45 min after the first drug inhalation and 45 min after the final dose, greater bronchodilatory effect was obtained from half the cumulative dose of ipratropium (RMT 10 microg per puff) when compared with the MDI (20 microg per puff). Therefore, ipratropium bromide delivered by RMT is as safe as, and can be more effective than, the MDI on acute administration in patients with COPD. Comparison of the bronchodilator response to an albuterol novel dry powder inhaler (DPI) (Clickhaler [CH]; ML Laboratories PLC; St. Albans, UK) activated at various inspiratory flow rates and to an albuterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) by patients with moderate to moderately severe stable asthma.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the bronchodilator response to albuterol DPI (200 microg) at inspiratory flow rates of approximately 15, 30, and 60 L/min in patients with stable asthma with demonstrated reversibility to albuterol. Active (albuterol via pMDI inhaled at 30 L/min) and placebo controls were included.
                Single center study at the chest/allergy unit of a teaching hospital in Canada.
                Sixteen patients with moderate to moderately severe stable asthma.
                Efficacy end points were FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, maximum expiratory flow, and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity. Safety end points included heart rate, BP, and tremor. There was no significant difference between the bronchodilator response to albuterol via the CH at 15, 30, and 60 L/min inspiratory flow rate and, at all flow rates, no significant difference was found comparing albuterol CH with the pMDI. All of the techniques for delivering albuterol provided significantly better bronchodilatation than placebo. Adverse events were minimal and did not differ between CH and pMDI or between the various flow rates inhaled through the CH.
                A novel passive albuterol DPI (CH) provides a similar bronchodilator response at 15, 30, and 60 L/min inspiratory flow rates compared with a pMDI used optimally.
In patients with stable COPD, pMDI produced similar outcomes to a dry powder device for delivering beta2-agonists, but the very small number of studies and included patients does not permit firm conclusions to be drawn. The soft mist device for ipratropium was more effective than a pMDI, but the data come from one small study. There need to be further well designed randomised controlled trials to define the role of inhaler devices using bronchodilators in stable COPD.