Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Which anticonvulsant for women with eclampsia? Evidence from the Collaborative Eclampsia Trial. A randomised controlled trial of intravenous magnesium sulphate versus placebo in the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia. A safer and more effective treatment regimen for eclampsia. Magnesium sulphate versus diazepam in the management of eclampsia: a randomized controlled trial. Expectant management in severe preeclampsia: does magnesium sulfate prevent the development of eclampsia? Magnesium sulfate in women with mild preeclampsia: a randomized controlled trial. Efficacy of magnesium sulphate and phenytoin in the management of eclampsia. The effect of magnesium sulfate therapy on the duration of labor in women with mild preeclampsia at term: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Magnesium sulphate given before very-preterm birth to protect infant brain: the randomised controlled PREMAG trial*. Intravenous and intramuscular magnesium sulphate regimens in severe pre-eclampsia.
Anticonvulsants are used for pre-eclampsia in the belief they prevent eclamptic convulsions, and so improve outcome. Evidence supported magnesium sulphate as the drug to evaluate.
                Eligible women (n=10141) had not given birth or were 24 h or less postpartum; blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg or more, and proteinuria of 1+ (30 mg/dL) or more; and there was clinical uncertainty about magnesium sulphate. Women were randomised in 33 countries to either magnesium sulphate (n=5071) or placebo (n=5070). Primary outcomes were eclampsia and, for women randomised before delivery, death of the baby. Follow up was until discharge from hospital after delivery. Analyses were by intention to treat.
                Follow-up data were available for 10,110 (99.7%) women, 9992 (99%) of whom received the allocated treatment. 1201 of 4999 (24%) women given magnesium sulphate reported side-effects versus 228 of 4993 (5%) given placebo. Women allocated magnesium sulphate had a 58% lower risk of eclampsia (95% CI 40-71) than those allocated placebo (40, 0.8%, vs 96, 1.9%; 11 fewer women with eclampsia per 1000 women). Maternal mortality was also lower among women allocated magnesium sulphate (relative risk 0.55, 0.26-1.14). For women randomised before delivery, there was no clear difference in the risk of the baby dying (576, 12.7%, vs 558, 12.4%; relative risk 1.02, 99% CI 0.92-1.14). The only notable difference in maternal or neonatal morbidity was for placental abruption (relative risk 0.67, 99% CI 0.45-0.89).
                Magnesium sulphate halves the risk of eclampsia, and probably reduces the risk of maternal death. There do not appear to be substantive harmful effects to mother or baby in the short term. Eclampsia, the occurrence of a seizure in association with pre-eclampsia, remains an important cause of maternal mortality. Although it is standard practice to use an anticonvulsant for management of eclampsia, the choice of agent is controversial and there has been little properly controlled evidence to support any of the options. 1687 women with eclampsia were recruited into an international multicentre randomised trial comparing standard anticonvulsant regimens. Primary measures of outcome were recurrence of convulsions and maternal death. Data are available for 1680 (99.6%) women: 453 allocated magnesium sulphate versus 452 allocated diazepam, and 388 allocated magnesium sulphate versus 387 allocated phenytoin. Most women (99%) received the anticonvulsant that they had been allocated. Women allocated magnesium sulphate had a 52% lower risk of recurrent convulsions (95% CI 64% to 37% reduction) than those allocated diazepam (60 [13.2%] vs 126 [27.9%]; ie, 14.7 [SD 2.6] fewer women with recurrent convulsions per 100 women; 2p < 0.00001). Maternal mortality was non-significantly lower among women allocated magnesium sulphate. There were no significant differences in other measures of serious maternal morbidity, or in perinatal morbidity or mortality. Women allocated magnesium sulphate had a 67% lower risk of recurrent convulsions (95% CI 79% to 47% reduction) than those allocated phenytoin (22 [5.7%] vs 66 [17.1%] ie, 11.4 [SD 2.2] fewer women with recurrent convulsions per 100 women; 2p < 0.00001). Maternal mortality was nonsignificantly lower among women allocated magnesium sulphate. Women allocated magnesium sulphate were also less likely to be ventilated, to develop pneumonia, and to be admitted to intensive care facilities than those allocated phenytoin. The babies of women who had been allocated magnesium sulphate before delivery were significantly less likely to be intubated at the place of delivery, and to be admitted to a special care nursery, than the babies of mothers who had been allocated phenytoin. There is now compelling evidence in favour of magnesium sulphate, rather than diazepam or phenytoin, for the treatment of eclampsia. To determine whether the administration of prophylactic intravenous magnesium sulphate reduces the occurrence of eclampsia in women with severe pre-eclampsia.
                Randomised controlled trial.
                A tertiary referral obstetric unit.
                Eight hundred and twenty-two women with severe pre-eclampsia requiring termination of pregnancy by induction of labour or caesarean section.
                The women were randomised to receive either placebo (saline) or magnesium sulphate intravenously. The investigators were blinded to the contents of the pre-mixed solutions.
                The occurrence of eclampsia in the two groups.
                The data of 699 women were evaluated. Fourteen were withdrawn after randomisation. The overall incidence of eclampsia was 1.8%. Of 345 women who received magnesium sulphate, one developed eclampsia (0.3%); in the placebo group, 11/340 women (3.2%) developed eclampsia (relative risk 0.09; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.69; P = 0.003).
                The use of intravenous magnesium sulphate in the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia significantly reduced the development of eclampsia. In a prospective controlled trial 91 consecutive women with eclampsia were randomly allocated either to a magnesium sulphate and nifedipine regime or to a lytic cocktail and nifedipine group. The type and severity of disease, details of labour and delivery, and the maternal and perinatal outcomes and complications related to the 2 treatment regimens were compared. Recurrence of fits, aspiration pneumonia and sudden hypotension were significantly reduced when patients were treated with the new magnesium sulphate and nifedipine regimen compared with the lytic cocktail plus nifedipine regimen. No patient treated with the new regimen died or had respiratory depression; in the other group there were 2 maternal deaths plus 1 case of severe hypoxic brain damage. No difference was observed in duration of labour or mode of delivery. Perinatal mortality was significantly lower in the magnesium sulphate plus nifedipine treated group. The synergistic action of magnesium sulphate and nifedipine in the dosage employed in this study may be used to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity in women with eclampsia. This randomized controlled trial compared the use of magnesium sulphate with diazepam as anticonvulsant in 51 eclamptic women. The use of magnesium sulphate was associated with less serious morbidity (in terms of recurrence of convulsions, cardiopulmonary problems, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, and acute renal failure) but the difference was not statistically significant (relative risk 0.6; 95% CI 0.3 to 1.2). The one maternal death occurred in the magnesium sulphate group. Convulsions recurred in five (21%) women in the magnesium sulphate group and seven (26%) women in the diazepam group. Urine output poor enough to prompt diuretic stimulation was less frequent in the magnesium sulphate group than in the diazepam group (RR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.9). Significantly fewer infants born in the magnesium sulphate group had low Apgar scores (less than 7 at 1 min) compared with those in the diazepam group (RR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4 to 0.9). There were two early neonatal deaths in the magnesium sulphate group, and three stillbirths in the diazepam group. This study suggests that magnesium sulphate has advantages over diazepam for the mother and the infant in the treatment of eclampsia, but the trial is small and should be replicated on a larger scale. Although magnesium sulfate has been traditional or standard treatment for severe preeclampsia and eclampsia to prevent convulsions, its efficiency has always been in doubt and its induced side-effects also make it controversial for use. In this study, 64 patients, diagnosed with severe preeclampsia, were randomized into group I (34 patients) managed with MgSO4, and group II (30 patients) managed without MgSO4. There were no occurrences of eclampsia in either group. Although there was no statistical significance in the final delivery method, group I had a higher rate in cesarean section, in which most were significantly due to fetal distress (p < 0.05). Furthermore, group I had significantly more babies with poor apgar score than group II (p = 0.019). During the treatment period for those with a gestational age of less than 34 weeks, there were two patients with abruptio placentae in group I and the treatment periods were noted to be longer in group II than in group I. From the results of monitoring serum magnesium level in group I, when therapeutic level was achieved, magnesium sulfate induced great discomfort which might have led to the deterioration of the patients' condition. According to this study, magnesium sulfate's minimal efficiency, and its adverse side-effects, also make magnesium sulfate a poor choice in the management of preeclampsia. Therefore, because of our poor understanding of the etiology of preeclampsia, suitable management should be undertaken without magnesium sulfate. Improvement of the patient's pathophysiological condition or termination of pregnancy as early as possible, is recommended. To determine whether magnesium sulfate prevents disease progression in women with mild preeclampsia.
                A total of 222 women with mild preeclampsia were randomized to receive intravenous magnesium sulfate (n = 109) or matched placebo (n = 113). Mild preeclampsia was defined as blood pressure of at least 140/90 mm Hg taken on two occasions in the presence of new-onset proteinuria. Patients with chronic hypertension or severe preeclampsia were excluded. Patients were considered to have disease progression if they developed signs or symptoms of severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, or laboratory abnormalities of full or partial HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) syndrome.
                The groups were similar with respect to maternal age, ethnicity, gestational age, parity, and maternal weight at enrollment. Fourteen women (12.8%) in the magnesium group and 19 (16.8%) in the placebo group developed severe preeclampsia after randomization (relative risk = 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.4, 1.5, P =.41). None in either group developed eclampsia or thrombocytopenia. Women assigned magnesium had similar rates of cesarean delivery (30% versus 25%), chorioamnionitis (3% versus 2.7%), endometritis (5.3% versus 4.3%), and postpartum hemorrhage (1% versus 0.9%), compared to those assigned placebo. Neonates born to women assigned magnesium had similar mean Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes as those born to women assigned placebo (7.7 +/- 1.5 versus 7.8 +/- 1.6 and 8.7 +/- 0.7 versus 8.8 +/- 0.6, respectively).
                Magnesium sulfate does not have a major impact on disease progression in women with mild preeclampsia. Magnesium use does not seem to increase rates of cesarean delivery, infectious morbidity, obstetric hemorrhage, or neonatal depression. Fifty pregnant women admitted with diagnosis of eclampsia were randomly allocated to magnesium sulphate (Group A) or phenytoin sodium (Group B) treatment group. Incidence of recurrence of seizures maternal as well as perinatal morbidity and mortality were compared in both the groups. Mean maternal age, parity and gestational age was similar in both the groups. Mean birth weight was significantly lower in Group B compared to Group A. Seizure frequency prior to hospitalization was 5.4 +/- 4.7 in Group A and 4.8-3.6 in Group B. Mean time interval between occurrence of first seizure and hospitalization was 9.6 +/- 3.5 hours in Group A and 11.8 +/- 9.3 hours in Group B, the difference was not statistically significant. Women treated with phenytoin had a higher incidence of recurrent seizures (10/25-40%) than those treated with magnesium sulphate (2/25-8%). Majority of the women treated with phenytoin (6/10-60%) had single convulsion after initiation of anticonvulsant therapy and 1 woman of each group had recurrent convulsions (75). There was no significant difference in perinatal outcome in both the groups. Maternal morbidity was comparable in both the groups and there was no maternal death in either of the groups. The primary outcome was to determine whether magnesium sulfate therapy prolongs the duration of labor in women with mild preeclampsia. Secondary outcomes were to assess the side effects associated with magnesium sulfate therapy: hours and maximum dose of oxytocin, incidence of progression to severe preeclampsia, incidence of cesarean delivery, change in maternal hematocrit, incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, incidence of maternal infection, and Apgar scores.
                Women with a diagnosis of mild preeclampsia at term were randomized to receive standard therapy during labor and for 12 hours post partum with either magnesium sulfate (n = 67) or a matching placebo solution (n = 68).
                There was no difference between magnesium sulfate and placebo with respect to the primary outcome variables: total length of labor (median 17.8 hours vs 16.5 hours, p = 0.7) and length of the active phase of labor (median 5.4 hours vs 6.0 hours, p = 0.5). In addition, no difference was observed in the secondary outcome variables: hours of oxytocin use, change in hematocrit, frequency of maternal infection, progression to severe preeclampsia, incidence of cesarean delivery, and Apgar scores. Although not statistically significant, the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage was approximately fourfold greater in the magnesium sulfate group (relative risk 4.1, 95% confidence interval 0.5 to 35.4). There was a significant difference in the maximum dose of oxytocin used (13.9 +/- 8.6 mU/min with magnesium sulfate vs 11.0 +/- 7.6 mU/min with placebo, p = 0.036).
                The use of magnesium sulfate during labor in women with mild preeclampsia at term does not affect any component of labor but did necessitate a higher dose of oxytocin. To evaluate whether magnesium sulphate (MgSO(4)) given to women at risk of very-preterm birth would be neuroprotective in preterm newborns and would prevent neonatal mortality and severe white-matter injury (WMI).
                A randomised study.
                Eighteen French tertiary hospitals. Population Women with fetuses of gestational age < 33 weeks whose birth was planned or expected within 24 hours were enrolled from July 1997 to July 2003 with follow up of infants until hospital discharge. METHODS Five hundred and seventy-three mothers were randomly assigned to receive a single 40-ml infusion of 0.1 g/ml of MgSO(4) (4 g) solution or isotonic 0.9% saline (placebo) over 30 minutes. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number 00120588.
                The primary endpoints were rates of severe WMI or total mortality before hospital discharge, and their combined outcome. Analyses were based on intention to treat.
                After 6 years of enrolment, the trial was stopped. Data from 688 infants were analysed. Comparing infants who received MgSO(4) or placebo, respectively, total mortality (9.4 versus 10.4%; OR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.44-1.44), severe WMI (10.0 versus 11.7%; OR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.47-1.31) and their combined outcomes (16.5 versus 17.9%; OR: 0.86, 95% CI 0.55-1.34) were less frequent for the former, but these differences were not statistically significant. No major maternal adverse effects were observed in the MgSO(4) group.
                Although our results are inconclusive, improvements of neonatal outcome obtained with MgSO(4) are of potential clinical significance. More research is needed to assess the protective effect of MgSO(4) alone or in combination with other neuroprotective molecules. Patients with severe pre-eclampsia were randomised to receive magnesium sulphate according to an intramuscular (IM) (N = 9) or an intravenous (i.v.) (N = 8) regimen. The IM regimen consisted of a loading dose of 14 g (4 g i.v. and 10 g IM) followed by 5 g 4-hourly. Patients given the IV regimen received a 6 g i.v. loading dose followed by a maintenance infusion of 2 g/h. Clinical outcome, laboratory parameters and serum magnesium levels were recorded for both groups. There were no significant differences between groups with regard to clinical outcome of either mother or child. Similar average serum magnesium concentrations were produced by the regimens the only significant difference was that fluctuations in magnesium levels were greater with the IM than the i.v. regimen. None of the patients had seizures despite levels mostly below 2 mmol/l.
Magnesium sulphate more than halves the risk of eclampsia, and probably reduces maternal death. There is no clear effect on outcome after discharge from hospital. A quarter of women report side effects with magnesium sulphate.