Urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the best management for biliary colic. A prospective randomized study of 75 cases. Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
Delay of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after the diagnosis of biliary colic may increase the probability of recurrent emergency admission while awaiting elective cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to compare the possible advantages and safety of urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ULC) with elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) in patients with biliary colic.
                Between 2001 and 2003, 75 patients with biliary colic were included in this study. The patients were classified into following two groups: patients who had ULC in 24 h were in group I (n = 28) and patients who had ELC (mean interval 4.22 +/- 1.42 months) were in group II (n = 35). Conversion to open cholecystectomy, operative time, postoperative hospital stay, costs, and complications were evaluated.
                In group II, 9 patients made a total of 13 return visits to the emergency department with recurrent attacks of biliary colic or complications of gallstone disease. Mean operative time increased from 35.1 +/- 6.74 min for urgent laparascopic cholecystectomy to 49.9 +/- 6.12 min for ELC (p > 0.05) and hospital stay time increased from 1.06 +/- 0.4 to 2.31 +/- 2.36 days (p < 0.05). Conversion to open cholecystectomy increased from 0% in group I to 17.2% in group II (p < 0.05).
                ULC for biliary colic may be the most medically efficacious and cost-effective treatment. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to define the optimum management between early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis.
                Patients were randomized to receive either early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 h of randomization or initial conservative treatment followed by delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy 6-8 weeks later.
                There were 53 patients in the early group and 51 in the delayed group. There was no significant difference in conversion rate (early 21 per cent versus delayed 24 per cent), postoperative analgesic requirement (1 versus 2 doses) and postoperative complications. However, the early group had significantly longer operating time (122.8 versus 106.6 min, P = 0.04) and shorter total hospital stay (7.6 versus 11.6 days, P < 0.001).
                Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible for acute cholecystitis with the additional benefit of shorter total hospital stay. Apart from a shorter operating time, treating patients with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not offer additional benefit.
Based on evidence from only one high-bias risk trial, it appears that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (less than 24 hours after diagnosis of biliary colic) decreases the morbidity during the waiting period for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (mean waiting time 4.2 months), the hospital stay, and operating time. Further randomised clinical trials are necessary to confirm or refute these findings, and to determine if early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is better than the delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy if the waiting time is shortened further.