The severity of trauma determines the immune response to PF4/heparin and the frequency of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. [Prevention of thromboembolism with low molecular weight heparin (Fragmin) in obstetrics].
Heparin can induce heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The combined effect of type of surgery (major vs minor) and heparin on this prothrombotic immune reaction to platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin was analyzed. In a randomized, double-blind study, trauma patients receiving low-molecular-weight (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) for thrombosis prophylaxis were assessed for PF4/heparin-antibody seroconversion, HIT, and thrombosis according to type of surgery. The risk for seroconversion was higher than major versus minor surgery odds ratio, 7.98 [95% confidence interval, 2.06-31.00], P = .003, controlled for potential confounders, as was the risk for HIT (2.2% [95% confidence interval, 0.3%-4.1%] vs 0.0%, P = .010). During LMWH compared with UFH thromboprophylaxis, HIT (1 of 298 vs 4 of 316; P = .370) and PF4/heparin seroconversion (1.7% vs 6.6%; P = .002) were less frequent, driven by differences in patients undergoing major surgery (incidence of HIT: LMWH 0.8% vs UFH 4.0%; P = .180; seroconversion rates: 4.0% vs 17.0%; P = .001). After minor surgery, no case of HIT occurred. The severity of trauma and the need for major surgery strongly influence the risk of an anti-PF4/heparin immune response, which is then increased by UFH. In major trauma certoparin may be safer than UFH because it induces HIT-antibody seroconversion, and the corresponding risk of HIT, less frequently. A total of 130 obstetrical patients were treated with either low molecular weight (LMW) or unfractionated (UFH) heparin as part of prospective study comparing their efficacy in the prevention of thromboembolism. A single daily dose of 2500-5000 anti-Xa-units LMW heparin (Fragmin) or two to three daily doses of 5000 IU UFH (Liquemin) were given to two groups of 15 patients with therapeutic tocolysis and 50 patients with cesarean section. Patients with cesarean section were given 500 ml Dextran 60 i.v. during surgery followed by subcutaneous injection of heparin eight to ten hours after surgery. Heparin therapy was continued for ten days after surgery. None of the patients exhibited clinical signs of thrombosis. The majority of patients showed symptoms of local irritation at the site of heparin injection (69% of patients with LMW heparin; 80% of patients with UFH). Hematomas at the site of injection were significantly smaller when LMW heparin was used instead of UFH. A number of patients experienced headache after heparin application (10% of patients with LMW heparin; 13% of patients with UFH). There were no cases of post surgical haemorrhage. Comparison of daily profiles revealed a significantly higher anti-Xa-activity of LMW heparin compared to UFH. In contrast, other coagulation parameters were not different in the two experimental groups (antithrombin III, partial thrombin time, thrombin time). Hematologic parameters and liver enzymes were in the physiological range in both experimental groups and none of the patients exhibited signs of heparin induced thrombocytopenia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
There was a lower incidence of HIT and HIT complicated by VTE in postoperative patients undergoing thromboprophylaxis with LMWH compared with UFH. This is consistent with the current clinical use of LMWH over UFH as front-line heparin therapy. However, conclusions are limited by a scarcity of high quality evidence. We did not expect the paucity of RCTs including HIT as an outcome as heparin is one of the most commonly used drugs worldwide and HIT is a life-threatening adverse drug reaction. To address the scarcity of clinically-relevant information on the topic of HIT as a whole, HIT should be included as an outcome in future RCTs of heparin, and HIT as an adverse drug reaction should be considered in clinical recommendations regarding monitoring of the platelet count for HIT.