Evaluation of the effectiveness of a low sodium diet in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Effect of dietary change on the return of hypertension after withdrawal of prolonged antihypertensive therapy (DISH). Dietary Intervention Study of Hypertension. Sodium reduction and weight loss in the treatment of hypertension in older persons: a randomized controlled trial of nonpharmacologic interventions in the elderly (TONE). TONE Collaborative Research Group. Randomised controlled factorial trial of dietary advice for patients with a single high blood pressure reading in primary care. Effect of dietary counselling on blood pressure and arterial plasma catecholamines in primary hypertension. Feasibility of a long-term low-sodium diet in mild hypertension. Effects of high- and low-sodium diets on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with hypertension receiving aliskiren. Is low salt dietary advice a useful therapy in hypertensive patients with poorly controlled blood pressure? Low sodium diet and pregnancy-induced hypertension: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Effect of low vs. high dietary sodium on blood pressure levels in a normotensive Indo-Asian population.
28 patients who had a sustained diastolic blood pressure of 95 to 104 mm Hg and who had no treatment for it for at least 13 months before the trial, but who were otherwise unselected, took part in a randomised controlled trial in which the effect of a restricted sodium diet was compared with that of a general health package. The general health package did not include any specific hypotensive procedures. Changes in blood pressure were measured at predetermined intervals over the course of a year. Within each group both systolic and diastolic blood pressure fell to a highly significant extent after a year, but there was no significant difference between the groups. It would thus seem that the antihypertensive effect of a restricted sodium diet may be related to the increased consultation and monitoring activity of such intervention rather than to the dietary manipulation itself. The possibility exists that dietary modification may increase the number of patients who remain normotensive after drug withdrawal. In an effort to resolve this question, former Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Stepped Care participants (n = 496) were randomized into four major groups at the end of the programme (greater than 5 years antihypertensive therapy): controls (continue medication); discontinue medication, no dietary intervention; discontinue medication and weight loss; discontinue medication and reduce sodium. Groups 1, 2 and 4 were further divided into obese (greater than or equal to 120% ideal weight, and non-obese groups). The weight reduction group (greater than or equal to 120% ideal weight) lost 10.1 +/- 11 lbs without changing dietary sodium (n = 87). The sodium restriction group reduced urine sodium excretion from 145 to 97 mEq per day (n = 169). Sixty per cent of the weight loss group were normotensive at 56 weeks compared to 35% withdrawn from medication without dietary intervention. The highest 56 weeks success rates were in the mild non-overweight hypertensives on sodium restriction (78%), and the mild overweight hypertensives on weight reduction (72%). Randomization to either weight loss group or sodium restriction group increased the likelihood of remaining off drugs (adjusted odds ratio of 3.43 for the weight group and 2.17 for the sodium group (P less than 0.05). Age, severe hypertension greater than 5 years previous to entry into Dietary Intervention Study of Hypertension (DISH) or need for several drugs increased the chance of failure. Nonpharmacologic interventions are frequently recommended for treatment of hypertension in the elderly, but there is a paucity of evidence from randomized controlled trials in support of this recommendation.
                To determine whether weight loss or reduced sodium intake is effective in the treatment of older persons with hypertension.
                Randomized controlled trial.
                A total of 975 [corrected] men and women aged 60 to 80 years with systolic blood pressure lower than 145 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure lower than 85 mm Hg while receiving treatment with a single antihypertensive medication.
                Four academic health centers.
                The 585 obese participants were randomized to reduced sodium intake, weight loss, both, or usual care, and the 390 nonobese participants were randomized to reduced sodium intake or usual care. Withdrawal of antihypertensive medication was attempted after 3 months of intervention.
                Diagnosis of high blood pressure at 1 or more follow-up visits, or treatment with antihypertensive medication, or a cardiovascular event during follow-up (range, 15-36 months; median, 29 months).
                The combined outcome measure was less frequent among those assigned vs not assigned to reduced sodium intake (relative hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.81; P<.001) and, in obese participants, among those assigned vs not assigned to weight loss (relative hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.87; P<.001). Relative to usual care, hazard ratios among the obese participants were 0.60 (95% CI, 0.45-0.80; P<.001) for reduced sodium intake alone, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.49-0.85; P=.002) for weight loss alone, and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.35-0.64; P<.001) for reduced sodium intake and weight loss combined. The frequency of cardiovascular events during follow-up was similar in each of the 6 treatment groups.
                Reduced sodium intake and weight loss constitute a feasible, effective, and safe nonpharmacologic therapy of hypertension in older persons. To assess the effect of brief interventions during the "watchful waiting" period for hypertension.
                Factorial trial.
                General practice.
                296 patients with blood pressure > 160/90 mm Hg were randomised to eight groups defined by three factors: an information booklet; low sodium, high potassium salt; prompt sheets for high fruit, vegetable, fibre; and low fat.
                Blood pressure (primary outcome); secondary outcomes of diet, weight, and dietary biomarkers (urinary sodium:potassium (Na:K) ratio; carotenoid concentrations).
                Blood pressure was not affected by the booklet (mean difference (diastolic blood pressure) at one month 0.2, 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 2.0), salt (0.13; 1.7 to 2.0), or prompts (0.52; 1.3 to 2.4). The salt decreased Na:K ratio (difference 0.32; 0.08 to 0.56, P = 0.01), and the prompts helped control weight (difference 0.39 (0.85 to 0.05) kg at one month, P = 0.085; 1.2 (0.1 to 2.25) kg at six months, P = 0.03). Among those with lower fruit and vegetable consumption (< 300 g per day), prompts increased fruit and vegetable consumption and also carotenoid concentrations (difference 143 (16 to 269) mmol/l, P < 0.03) but did not decrease blood pressure.
                During watchful waiting, over and above the effect of brief advice and monitoring, an information booklet, lifestyle prompts, and low sodium salt do not reduce blood pressure. Secondary analysis suggests that brief interventions-particularly lifestyle prompts-can make useful changes in diet and help control weight, which previous research indicates are likely to reduce the long term risk of stroke. There is still a need of support for nonpharmacologic treatment of uncomplicated, mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. We investigated whether a low sodium-based diet implemented by a nutritionist could lower blood pressure and affect sympathetic activity. Middle-aged, otherwise healthy men with never-treated essential hypertension (n = 95) were randomized to an intervention group, a blood pressure control group, and a time control group. The intervention group was advised to use less sodium chloride in their diet, and if necessary, less saturated fat and decrease body weight. They attended regular clinic visits as did the blood pressure control group. After 1 year, the intervention group had achieved on average 72 mmol/24 h lower urinary sodium excretion (P < .001) and a decrease in body weight of 2.7 +/- 0.5 kg (P < .001). Both supine and standing mean blood pressure were on average 8 to 10 mm Hg lower after intervention compared with the two control groups (P < .001). Arterial plasma epinephrine, measured in all 40-year-old subjects (n = 30), decreased in parallel in all three groups (P < .05), indicating some habituation to the invasive procedure and clinic visits. However, the decrease in norepinephrine was significant (P < .001) only in the intervention group; it correlated with the weight loss (r = 0.76, P < .05) and was significantly higher (P < .05) than in both control groups. These results suggest that broad dietary advice (ie, low intake of sodium chloride, saturated fat and energy), implemented by a nutritionist, may have a significant blood pressure lowering effect and a favorable sympathicolytic effect in uncomplicated, mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. The present study set out to assess the feasibility of long-term moderate dietary sodium restriction in patients with mild hypertension in general practice. After screening and a run-in phase of 6-8 weeks, a total of 77 previously undiagnosed mildly hypertensive patients were identified. Half of them were randomized to receive a few simple dietary instructions from their general practitioners in order to reduce salt usage; the others were randomized to receive no advice. The patients were followed up for 12 months with quarterly visits. A total of 56 patients (72.7%) completed the study, 26 on a low-sodium diet (LD) and 30 on their usual diet (UD). At each visit in the diet phase, patients provided 24h urine, which was analysed for volume and sodium concentration in order to assess their sodium intake. Blood pressure, heart the rate and body weight were recorded. The mean urinary sodium excretion for all diet phase visits overlapped in the two groups (177.0 +/- 32.9 vs. 169.3 +/- 49.4 mEq/24h respectively in the LD and UD groups). Nevertheless the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures for all diet phase visits were significantly lower in the LD than in UD group (144.2 +/- 11.1/91.6 +/- 6.4 and 148.0 +/- 13.7/95.6 +/- 4.7 mmHg respectively, P less than 0.01). Our data suggest that it is not feasible at present to reduce sodium intake in mild hypertensives with simple and inexpensive dietary instructions, the only ones suitable for widespread application in general practice. Dietary sodium reduction and, as necessary, pharmacologic treatment are recommended for hypertension management. This prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point, multicenter, crossover study investigated the effect of dietary sodium intake on mean ambulatory systolic blood pressure (maSBP) in patients with hypertension receiving aliskiren 300 mg once daily. Following a 2- to 4-week washout period, patients were randomized to a high- (≥ 200 mmol/d) or low- (≤ 100 mmol/d) sodium diet and were started on aliskiren, 300 mg/d. After 4 weeks, patients were crossed over to the alternate diet for an additional 4 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was change in maSBP between diets. During treatment with aliskiren, maSBP was significantly lower with the low-sodium diet compared with the high-sodium diet (least squares mean difference, 9.4 mm Hg; 95% CI, 7.5-11.4; P < .0001). The percentage of patients achieving a maSBP response to aliskiren (<130 mm Hg or a ≥ 20-mm Hg reduction from baseline) was greater with the low- (76.5%) versus the high-sodium diet (42.6%; P < .0001). Overall, 40.9% patients had ≥ 1 adverse event and the rates were similar between groups. In this study, aliskiren was well tolerated and a low-sodium diet accentuated its antihypertensive effect. In order to decide whether or not to advise a low Na trial routinely in a hypertension clinic, a randomised controlled 'management' trial was conducted to assess dietary compliance, well-being and changes in antihypertensive medication as a result of such a diet. Sixty-five out-patients on drug treatment for hypertension but with diastolic blood pressures greater than 95 mm Hg on two successive occasions were randomly allocated either to an index group on a 1 g Na (44 mmol) daily diet or to a reference group. Dietary advice was given in detail and repeated as necessary to ensure there was no misunderstanding. After three months 28% of the index group still added salt to their cooking and 13% sometimes added salt at the table. The difference between the groups in 24-hour Na excretion averaged 59 mmol at the end of the trial but 55% of the index group had a 24-hour Na excretion greater than 80 mmol. The average blood pressure at the end of the trial was only a 4 mm Hg systolic and 3 mm Hg diastolic lower in the index group. However, this modest benefit was achieved without any obvious deterioration in the quality of the lives of the patients on the low Na diet. The index group enjoyed their food as much as before and tended to require less drug treatment. On the debit side the index group complained more of transient unsteadiness (p less than 0.05) suggestive of postural hypotension. Low salt dietary advice is only marginally effective in patients poorly controlled on drug treatment. Non-compliance limits the usefulness of the advice. To examine the effectiveness of the standard policy in the Netherlands to prescribe a sodium restricted diet to prevent or to treat mild pregnancy-induced hypertension.
                Multi-centre randomised controlled trial between April 1992 and April 1994.
                Seven practices of independent midwives and one university hospital.
                The experimental group comprised 184 women given a low sodium diet (< or = 50 mmol sodium/day) and a control group of 177 women given a normal diet. Eligible women for inclusion had had a rise of blood pressure, or excessive weight gain or oedema during the antenatal period. The 361 women in the trial were recruited from 2020 nulliparae, of whom 1512 (75%) gave informed consent at the beginning of their pregnancy to participate in the study.
                The difference between highest diastolic blood pressure after randomisation and diastolic blood pressure at the moment of randomisation; referral and admission to hospital for hypertension.
                There was no difference in increase of diastolic blood pressure after randomisation, the percentage of referral and admission to hospital for hypertension, or in obstetric outcome between the two groups. Urinary sodium excretion after randomisation in the normal diet group was significantly higher than in the low sodium group.
                Prescribing a sodium-restricted diet to prevent or to treat mild pregnancy-induced hypertension is not effective. Therefore there is no need to introduce a salt restricted diet in prenatal care, although increasing evidence shows that a low sodium diet prevents hypertension in non-pregnant individuals. Hypertension is a major modifiable risk factor, and while sodium restriction in hypertensive patients appears effective, its role in normotensive individuals remains unclear. We assessed the effect of a low vs. high-sodium diet on blood pressure in normotensive Indo-Asian adults.
                A randomized, controlled, crossover trial was conducted on 200 normotensive subjects randomly selected from the general population in Karachi, Pakistan. Participants were randomized to either a low (20 mEq/day) or a high-sodium diet (220 mEq/day) for 1 week, followed by 1 week of washout, then the alternate diet for 1 week. The primary outcome was difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) measured at the end of each phase in the overall population.
                Mean (95% confidence interval) decline in 24-h urinary sodium excretion was 81.0 (69.6-92.4) mEq/day (P < 0.001), and in SBP was 1 (0-3)mm Hg (P = 0.17) between high and low-sodium phase. A significant interaction was detected (P = 0.001) between dietary sodium and baseline SBP with a greater adjusted mean (95% confidence interval) decline in SBP (6 (2-9)mm Hg) among participants with high-normal SBP (130-139 mm Hg) and no significant change (-1(-2 to 1)) in those with normal baseline SBP (<130 mm Hg), respectively.
                Reducing sodium intake has a beneficial effect on blood pressure in Indo-Asians with high-normal SBP, at least in the short term. Given the ubiquity of high-normal blood pressure (BP), and frank hypertension in this population, we argue that primary prevention strategies, targeted at use of discretionary sodium, should now be designed and evaluated.
Intensive interventions, unsuited to primary care or population prevention programmes, provide only minimal reductions in blood pressure during long-term trials. Further evaluations to assess effects on morbidity and mortality outcomes are needed for populations as a whole and for patients with elevated blood pressure.
A low sodium diet may help in maintenance of lower blood pressure following withdrawal of antihypertensives. If this is confirmed, with no increase in cardiovascular events, then targeting of comprehensive dietary and behavioural programmes in patients with elevated blood pressure requiring drug treatment would be justified.