Randomized controlled trials of 5- and 14-days primaquine therapy against relapses of vivax malaria in an Afghan refugee settlement in Pakistan. Randomized trial of 3-dose regimens of tafenoquine (WR238605) versus low-dose primaquine for preventing Plasmodium vivax malaria relapse. Blood stage antimalarial efficacy of primaquine in Plasmodium vivax malaria. In-vivo sensitivity of Plasmodium vivax isolates from Rond nia (western Amazon region, Brazil) to regimens including chloroquine and primaquine. Efficacy of a 14-day primaquine regimen in preventing relapses in patients with Plasmodium vivax malaria in Mumbai, India. Compliance with 14-day primaquine therapy for radical cure of vivax malaria--a randomized placebo-controlled trial comparing unsupervised with supervised treatment. Radical curative efficacy of five-day regimen of primaquine for treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria in India. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus chloroquine to treat vivax malaria in Afghanistan: an open randomized, non-inferiority, trial.
Primaquine is the only drug available that can eliminate hypnozoites from the liver and prevent relapses of vivax malaria. The World Health Organization recommends a course of 14-21 days depending on region and strain. The National Malaria Control and Eradication Programmes of Pakistan and India have adhered to a 5-day course as their standard as it is deemed more practical to implement and because facility for detecting glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is seldom available at the periphery. Evidence for the efficacy of the 5-day regimen is controversial or lacking. Two, year-long, randomized controlled trials were undertaken in an Afghan refugee camp in north-western Pakistan using a process of passive case detection and treatment at the camp's clinic: the first trial compared treatment with chloroquine alone versus chloroquine plus 5-days primaquine, the second trial compared chloroquine alone versus chloroquine plus 14-days primaquine. Chloroquine is not hypnozoitocidal and was administered to eliminate the erythrocytic stages and to alleviate clinical symptoms. The daily primaquine dose was 0.25 mg/kg bodyweight and the total chloroquine dose was 25 mg/kg over 3 days. During the first trial 52% (129/250) of the non-primaquine group recorded a 2nd clinical-parasitaemic episode and 23% recorded a 3rd, whereas 51% (128/250) of the 5-days primaquine group reported a 2nd episode and 21% recorded a 3rd. During the second trial 49% (49/100) of the non-primaquine group recorded a 2nd episode and 25% recorded a 3rd, whereas only 32% (32/100) of the 14-days primaquine group recorded a 2nd and only 2% recorded a 3rd. The 5-days primaquine regimen has no value as an anti-relapse therapy and should be abandoned. In extended tests in vivo in which vivax cases (n = 31) were treated with chloroquine 25 mg/kg and 14-days primaquine, there was no parasite recrudescence within 28 days and hence no evidence of resistance to chloroquine. Tafenoquine is an 8-aminoquinoline developed as a more effective replacement for primaquine. In a previous dose-ranging study in Thailand, 3 tafenoquine regimens with total doses ranging from 500 mg to 3000 mg prevented relapse of Plasmodium vivax malaria in most patients when administered 2 days after receipt of a blood schizonticidal dose of chloroquine.
                To improve convenience and to begin comparison of tafenoquine with primaquine, 80 patients with P. vivax infection were randomized to receive 1 of the following 5 treatments 1 day after receiving a blood schizonticidal dose of chloroquine: (A) tafenoquine, 300 mg per day for 7 days (n=18); (B) tafenoquine, 600 mg per day for 3 days (n=19); (C) tafenoquine, 600 mg as a single dose (n=18); (D) no further treatment (n=13); or (E) primaquine base, 15 mg per day for 14 days (n=12). The minimum duration of protocol follow-up was 8 weeks, with additional follow-up to 24 weeks.
                Forty-six of 55 tafenoquine recipients, 10 of 13 recipients of chloroquine only, and 12 of 12 recipients of chloroquine plus primaquine completed at least 8 weeks of follow-up (or had relapse). There was 1 relapse among recipients of chloroquine plus tafenoquine, 8 among recipients of chloroquine only, and 3 among recipients of chloroquine plus primaquine. The rate of protective efficacy (determined on the basis of reduction in incidence density) for all recipients of chloroquine plus tafenoquine, compared with recipients of chloroquine plus primaquine, was 92.6% (95% confidence interval, 7.3%-99.9%; P=.042, by Fisher's exact test).
                Tafenoquine doses as low as a single 600-mg dose may be useful for prevention of relapse of P. vivax malaria in Thailand. The blood stage antimalarial efficacy of primaquine (0.25 mg of base/kg of body weight/day over 14 days) and chloroquine (25 mg of base/kg over 3 days) were compared in 85 adult Thai men with acute Plasmodium vivax malaria. Most (75%) had at least one malaria episode previously. Parasite clearance times after primaquine alone (n = 30) were slower than after chloroquine (n = 30) or combined chloroquine-primaquine (n = 25), but all patients had a satisfactory initial therapeutic response. P. vivax malaria recurred in 10 (17%) of 60 patients followed for > or = 2 months and Plasmodium falciparum malaria developed in another 5 (8%) without reexposure to infection. Recurrences occurred < or = 5 weeks after primaquine treatment (n = 4), suggesting recrudescence, whereas recurrences after chloroquine treatment (n = 6) occurred > or = 5 weeks later, suggesting relapse. Vivax malaria responds well initially to either primaquine or chloroquine. The blood stage antimalarial activity of primaquine may mask chloroquine resistance in combined regimens. Seventy-nine adults with Plasmodium vivax malaria, from the Porto Velho area of Rond nia (western Amazon region, Brazil), gave informed consent to participate in a blind, clinical study of two regimens of treatment with chloroquine (CQ) and primaquine. The effectiveness of the 'classical' regimen (CQ for 3 days, followed by primaquine for 14 days) was compared with that of a 'short' regimen in which the two drugs were given simultaneously for 5 days. There were no cases of recrudescence indicative of CQ resistance (i.e. within 30 days of the first treatment dose) among the 73 patients who each completed a full, supervised course of treatment. However, 10 cases of apparent relapse were observed (all > 60 days after first treatment dose), representing 6.5% (2/31) of the patients who completed 60 days of follow-up after the classical treatment and 26.7% (8/30) of the short-regimen patients who completed the same period of follow-up. PCR-based comparison of parasitic DNA collected pre- and post-treatment was successful for eight of the 10 cases of apparent relapse and indicated that two such cases, both given the short regimen of treatment, were, in fact, probable cases of re-infection rather than of relapse. The results indicate that the classical schedule of treatment with chloroquine and primaquine was more effective at preventing relapses than the short regimen. However, since prolonged treatment with primaquine often produces side-effects that are severe enough to reduce compliance, the short schedule could be a useful alternative for malaria control in endemic areas of the Amazon region. We studied the antirelapse efficacy of a supervised 14-d 15 mg/d regimen of primaquine therapy (n = 131) compared with no antirelapse therapy (n = 142) in 273 patients with confirmed Plasmodium vivax malaria in Mumbai, India, between July 1998 and April 2000. There were 6/131 (4.6%) recurrences in patients given primaquine compared with 13/142 (9.2%) in those not given antirelapse therapy. In the 14-d primaquine group, polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformational polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) genotyping analysis of pre- and post-treatment blood samples was done for the 6 patients who had a recurrence of parasitaemia and the results gave a true relapse rate of 2.29% (3/131), 2 samples were classified as reinfections and 1 sample did not amplify. Our results indicate probable resistance to the 14-d regimen of primaquine for the first time in India and illustrate the need to (i) monitor patients given this regimen and (ii) carry out comparative studies between primaquine and new drugs such as tafenoquine and bulaquine for preventing relapses. The only available treatment that can eliminate the latent hypnozoite reservoir of vivax malaria is a 14 d course of primaquine (PQ). A potential problem with long-course chemotherapy is the issue of compliance after clinical symptoms have subsided. The present study, carried out at an Afghan refugee camp in Pakistan, between June 2000 and August 2001, compared 14 d treatment in supervised and unsupervised groups in which compliance was monitored by comparison of relapse rates. Clinical cases recruited by passive case detection were randomised by family to placebo, supervised, or unsupervised groups, and treated with chloroquine (25 mg/kg) over 3 days to eliminate erythrocytic stages. Individuals with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency were excluded from the trial. Cases allocated to supervision were given directly observed treatment (0.25 mg PQ/kg body weight) once per day for 14 days. Cases allocated to the unsupervised group were provided with 14 PQ doses upon enrollment and strongly advised to complete the course. A total of 595 cases were enrolled. After 9 months of follow up PQ proved equally protective against further episodes of P. vivax in supervised (odds ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.21-0.57) and unsupervised (odds ratio 0.37, 95% CI 0.23-0.59) groups as compared to placebo. All age groups on supervised or unsupervised treatment showed a similar degree of protection even though the risk of relapse decreased with age. The study showed that a presumed problem of poor compliance may be overcome with simple health messages even when the majority of individuals are illiterate and without formal education. Unsupervised treatment with 14-day PQ when combined with simple instruction can avert a significant amount of the morbidity associated with relapse in populations where G6PD deficiency is either absent or readily diagnosable. For over 4 decades the antimalarial program in India has been prescribing a 5-day primaquine regimen as an antirelapse therapy to treat Plasmodium vivax malaria. In view of conflicting reports on the effectiveness of this regimen in the Indian subcontinent, and the varying prevalence of P. vivax in various ecosystems in India, the antirelapse efficacy of this regimen was evaluated in Orissa, a malaria endemic state in eastern India where P. falciparum predominates. In 723 cases of P. vivax infection treated with chloroquine alone and followed up weekly for 1 yr, the prevalence of recurrence of parasitaemia with fever was 8.6%. Among another 759 P. vivax cases treated with chloroquine and a 5-day regimen of primaquine at 15 mg/day (adult dose), the recurrence of infection was 6.5%. The difference in recurrence was not significant (P = 0.53). It is important to note that in a great majority of cases of P. vivax in this area, infection did not recur even without treatment with primaquine. This finding, that the use of the 5-day primaquine regimen with chloroquine had no significant advantage over the use of chloroquine alone, undermines the rationale of using primaquine as an antirelapse drug in forested areas with a high prevalence of P. falciparum. Afghanistan's national guidelines recommend chloroquine for the treatment of Plasmodium vivax infection, the parasite responsible for the majority of its malaria burden. Chloroquine resistance in P. vivax is emerging in Asia. Therapeutic responses across Afghanistan have not been evaluated in detail.
                Between July 2007 and February 2009, an open-label, randomized controlled trial of chloroquine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in patients aged three months and over with slide-confirmed P. vivax mono-infections was conducted. Consistent with current national guidelines, primaquine was not administered. Subjects were followed up daily during the acute phase of illness (days 0-3) and weekly until day 56. The primary endpoint was the overall cumulative parasitological failure rate at day 56 after the start of treatment, with the hypothesis being that dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was non-inferior compared to chloroquine (Delta = 5% difference in proportion of failures).
                Of 2,182 individuals with positive blood films for P. vivax, 536 were enrolled in the trial. The day 28 cure rate was 100% in both treatment groups. Parasite clearance was more rapid with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine than chloroquine. At day 56, there were more recurrent infections in the chloroquine arm (8.9%, 95% CI 6.0-13.1%) than the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine arm (2.8%, 95% CI 1.4-5.8%), a difference in cumulative recurrence rate of 6.1% (2-sided 90%CI +2.6 to +9.7%). The log-rank test comparing the survival curves confirmed the superiority of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine over chloroquine (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that a lower initial haemoglobin concentration was also independently associated with recurrence. Both regimens were well tolerated and no serious adverse events were reported.
                Chloroquine remains an efficacious treatment for the treatment of vivax malaria in Afghanistan. In a setting where radical therapy cannot be administered, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine provides additional benefit in terms of post-treatment prophylaxis, reducing the incidence of recurrence from 4-8 weeks after treatment.
Primaquine (15 mg/day for 14 days) plus chloroquine is more effective than chloroquine alone or primaquine (15 mg/day for 5 days) plus chloroquine in preventing relapses of vivax malaria. Primaquine (five days) plus chloroquine appears no better than chloroquine. Countries should follow the WHO's recommendation for 14-day primaquine plus chloroquine regimen. Alternative regimens need to be evaluated in randomized controlled trials, which should also consider variations in regional P. vivax strains and the possibility of primaquine resistance, reinfection, and adherence in those who relapse.