Double-blind study of vigabatrin in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. Vigabatrin in the treatment of epilepsy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl GABA) in drug-resistant epilepsy. Effects of vigabatrin on partial seizures and cognitive function. Vigabatrin as add-on therapy for adult complex partial seizures: a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study. The Canadian Vigabatrin Study Group. A double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of vigabatrin 2 g/day and 3 g/day in uncontrolled partial seizures. Dose-Response Study of Vigabatrin as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled complex partial seizures. Adjuvant vigabatrin in refractory epilepsy: a ceiling to effective dosage in individual patients? Vigabatrin vs carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. A randomized, controlled study. Vigabatrin vs. carbamazepine monotherapy in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: a randomized response conditional cross-over study. Evaluation of the effects of vigabatrin on cognitive abilities and quality of life in epilepsy.
Thirty-one patients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy entered the study. Vigabatrin (2 to 3 g/d, stratified according to weight) and placebo were administered orally, as add-on therapy in random order under double-blind conditions, each for three months using a crossover design. Thirty patients completed both periods. Of these, ten patients (33%) showed a decrease in seizure frequency of 50% or more. In the 15 patients presenting with complex partial seizures, "temporal" electroencephalographic abnormalities, and relatively low seizure frequency, there was a significant reduction in seizure frequency during vigabatrin treatment. No significant treatment effect was found for the remaining 15 patients, who presented with mixed seizure types, multifocal electroencephalographic abnormalities, and high seizure frequencies. Tolerability to vigabatrin was good; the most frequently reported unwanted effect was drowsiness. Plasma concentrations of phenytoin showed a significant reduction during the vigabatrin period. The results demonstrate the efficacy and good tolerability of vigabatrin therapy in patients with severe complex partial epilepsy. The efficacy and tolerability of vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl GABA, GVG), given as add-on therapy to 23 adult outpatients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy (17 with partial seizures), were studied using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. The study consisted of two 7-week periods during which vigabatrin and placebo were administered in random sequence. Dosage was 1.0 g twice daily for patients weighing less than or equal to 65 kg and 1.5 g twice daily for patients weighing greater than 65 kg. Three patients were dropped from the study, two for reasons unrelated to treatment and one because of the appearance of vertigo, headache, dysarthria, and ataxia, which subsided rapidly when vigabatrin was stopped (3 g daily). Sixteen of the 20 patients available for analysis showed a decrease in the total number of seizures as compared with the placebo period. Of these, 12 showed a greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency and 4 of the 12 showed a greater than 75% reduction. Both the total number of seizures and the number of partial seizures were significantly reduced by vigabatrin (p less than 0.01). Only in the patient who dropped out were severe adverse effects seen. The most frequently reported unwanted effect was mild drowsiness, which developed in seven patients on vigabatrin and in one on placebo. Positive effects, however, were also seen with six patients who reported an improved sense of well-being while receiving vigabatrin as compared with only 1 during the placebo period. No consistent changes in electrocardiogram (ECG), electroencephalogram (EEG), and visual-, auditory-, and somatosensory-evoked potentials were seen during the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Vigabatrin (GVG) (3 g/day) and placebo were compared as an add-on to standard therapy in therapy-resistant epileptic patients using a double-blind crossover design with randomized treatment allocation. Twenty-three patients entered the trial, with four dropping out due to either increased seizure frequency following the cross-over from GVG to placebo (n = 1), intolerance to GVG therapy (n = 2), or poor seizure record (n = 1). Of the 19 patients who completed the study, 17 had partial seizures, eight of whom had secondary generalization and two who had primary generalized seizures. Compared with placebo, GVG was associated with a significant reduction in seizure frequency (p less than 0.01), with 11 of 19 patients experiencing greater than 50% reduction in weekly seizure occurrence, two showing a 25-50% reduction, four unchanged, and two showing an increase in seizures. Global efficacy ratings were greater in the GVG period for 15 patients (p less than 0.05) compared with one in whom there was no period difference and two in whom ratings were higher in the placebo period. Fourteen of the 19 patients indicated a preference for the GVG period. Adverse effects observed during GVG treatment were generally mild and consisted of drowsiness, confusion, nausea, irritability, and constipation. No clinically significant alterations in laboratory test results were observed. No treatment-related changes in plasma concentrations of concomitant antiepileptic drugs were noted. These results confirm the antiepileptic efficacy of oral GVG in refractory epileptics. Forty five patients with refractory partial seizures were studied in a prospective, randomised, placebo controlled, add on, parallel group, double blind trial of the new antiepileptic drug vigabatrin (1.5 g twice daily) followed by open treatment. Seizure frequency was monitored throughout an eight week baseline, 20 weeks double blind, and up to 18 months of open vigabatrin treatment. Cognitive function, including measures of memory and concentration, mood, and behaviour were assessed at baseline and again during the 20th week of treatment. Vigabatrin was associated with a significant reduction in a measure of motor speed and overall score on a design learning test in the first 20 weeks of treatment. In comparison with the baseline period, vigabatrin treatment was associated with a significant reduction in median complex partial seizure frequency four to 12 and 12 to 20 weeks after commencing vigabatrin (-66% and -69% in the vigabatrin group, +50% and +25% in the placebo group). Ten of 20 patients on vigabatrin and four of 23 on placebo showed a > 50% reduction in complex partial seizure frequency in the last eight weeks of double blind treatment. At least 60% of responders had maintained the response to vigabatrin when assessed during the open phase of the trial at 44 weeks. Two patients discontinued vigabatrin because of depression, which resolved on drug withdrawal. Vigabatrin (VGB) is a novel antiepileptic drug effective as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures. In this study, the efficacy and tolerability of VGB as adjunctive therapy were evaluated in patients with refractory epilepsy. Adult patients with a definite diagnosis of complex partial seizures and/or partial seizures secondarily generalized were recruited from 10 Canadian centres. Patients were randomized to receive either active medication or placebo in a double- blind fashion and entered a 36-week titration and maintenance phase with regularly scheduled visits. Both efficacy parameters and safety assessments were monitored. Clinical laboratory, evoked potential studies, MRI, and neuropsychological tests were also performed. Forty-eight percent of VGB-treated patients vs. 26 percent of placebo-treated patients had a 50 percent or greater reduction in the frequency of complex partial seizures and partial seizures secondarily generalized. Vigabatrin was well tolerated by the majority of patients. Minor neurological side effects were observed in a number of patients in both treatment groups. No serious systemic toxicity was observed. No changes in evoked potential studies or MRI findings were noted. Vigabatrin was found to be an effective and well-tolerated antiepileptic drug when used as adjunctive therapy in patients with difficult to control complex partial seizures and for partial seizures secondarily generalized. Vigabatrin is a selective irreversible inhibitor of the GABA- degradating enzyme GABA transaminase and has shown efficacy in a number of clinical trials in patients with difficult to control partial seizures. Vigabatrin has been found most effective against complex partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures in both adults and children. Vigabatrin has also been shown to reduce infantile spasms secondary to various aetiologies and is most effective in spasms associated with tuberous sclerosis. The aim of this study was to further extend the clinical experience with VGB as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of adult patients with difficult to control complex partial seizures and/or partial seizures secondarily generalized. In addition to the assessments of efficacy and tolerability to VGB, neuropsychological evaluations were also carried out.
                Copyright 2000 BEA Trading Ltd. The efficacy and tolerability of vigabatrin as add-on therapy was assessed in patients with uncontrolled partial seizures. Ninety-seven patients entered this seven-centre, double-blind, placebo-crossover study. Vigabatrin (2 g or 3 g) or placebo was administered daily. Vigabatrin was well-tolerated and did not cause clinically significant adverse drug effects when added to established anticonvulsant therapy. No significant differences were observed between dose groups for the overall incidence of adverse events, although drowsiness and visual disturbances (diplopia, ataxia, visual abnormalities) showed a dose-related increase with vigabatrin treatment. The results of this study indicate that vigabatrin, given in a daily dose of either 2 g or 3 g is significantly more effective than placebo in reducing seizure frequency among patients with partial seizures. This placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study examined the efficacy and safety of three daily doses of vigabatrin (VGB; 1, 3, or 6 g) as add-on therapy in 174 patients with previously uncontrolled complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalization.
                A 12-week pretreatment assessment period was followed by drug therapy with a 6-week titration period and a 12-week maintenance phase.
                VGB doses of 3 and 6 g/day reduced median monthly frequency of seizures by 4.3 and 4.5 seizures, respectively, compared with 0.2 seizures for placebo (p = 0.0001). The percentages of patients classified as therapeutic successes (> or =50% reduction in seizure frequency) were 7% for placebo and 24, 51, and 54% for patients taking daily VGB doses of 1, 3, and 6 g, respectively; the comparison with placebo was significant for all treatment groups. The linear trend for dose response was highly significant (p< or =0.0001) for both median monthly seizure frequency and therapeutic success. Vigabatrin was well tolerated, causing no clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters, brain magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials, cognitive function, or psychosocial tests. Fatigue, drowsiness, and dizziness were the most common treatment-related adverse events in all treatment groups. Dropouts due to adverse events were higher in the 6-g/day group.
                VGB was significantly more effective than placebo as add-on therapy in reducing seizure frequency. VGB at 3 and 6 g/day produced the best efficacy: however, adverse events may limit the use of the 6-g/day dose in some patients. A double-blind, randomized, cross-over study of additional vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl-GABA, VGB, 1.0 g twice daily for 6 weeks, followed by 1.5 g twice daily for 6 weeks) and matched placebo was undertaken in 24 patients with refractory epilepsy. Nineteen completed the trial satisfactorily. Fewer seizure days were reported during VGB treatment [placebo 41, VGB 23, p < 0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.5 to -14]. An overall reduction in median seizure numbers failed to reach statistical significance (n = 19; placebo 52, VGB 32, NS, 95% CI -18 to +24). Subgroup analysis, however, showed a significant reduction in partial seizures (n = 17) with 2 g VGB daily (placebo 22, VGB 13, p < 0.05, 95% CI -0.5 to -16.5), but not with higher dosage (placebo 28, VGB 22, NS, 95% CI -18 to +11). A deterioration in control of partial seizures as compared with the equivalent placebo phase was observed when patients were changed from 2 to 3 g/day VGB (2 g VGB 13, 3 g VGB 22, p = 0.05, 95% CI 0 to +20). Loss of efficacy was noted in 3 patients, and seizure control worsened slightly in 5 others. One previously resistant patient developed a therapeutic response, and 2 other patients reported an additional useful reduction in seizures. In the remaining 8 patients, seizure frequency did not change. VGB did not appear to benefit tonic-clonic seizures. Serum VGB concentrations were higher during treatment with 3 g (15.5 +/- 8.9 mg/L) daily than with 2 g (13.5 +/- 11.2 mg/L). No important alterations were noted in the concentrations of concomitantly administered antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) throughout the trial. VGB is useful adjuvant therapy for treatment of partial seizures. There may be a ceiling to effective dosage. This demands individual dose titration for each patient. To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cognitive effects of initial vigabatrin monotherapy compared with initial carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.
                Open, randomized, controlled design. Follow-up period of 12 months.
                University hospital with an epilepsy center.
                A total of 100 patients, aged 15 to 64 years, classified as suffering from partial seizures and/or generalized tonic-clonic seizures were randomized to either vigabatrin or carbamazepine monotherapy. Fifty-nine patients with a single epileptic seizure and no antiepileptic drug treatment served as a control population for objective safety measures.
                To evaluate the comparative efficacy and toxicity of vigabatrin and carbamazepine, the drug success rate (ie, the proportion of patients continuing successful treatment with the randomly assigned drug) after 12 months of steady-state treatment was used. To evaluate the safety of the drugs in addition to reported side effects, visual evoked potential recordings and neuropsychological evaluation were performed during follow-up.
                During the 12-month follow-up period, 60% of patients receiving vigabatrin and carbamazepine were treated successfully. Vigabatrin caused fewer side effects that required discontinuation of therapy. However, vigabatrin had to be discontinuated more often owing to lack of efficacy, and fewer of the successfully treated patients receiving vigabatrin achieved total freedom from seizures. Vigabatrin had no detrimental effects on cognitive functions. Retrieval from both episodic and semantic memory and flexibility of mental processing improved significantly in patients successfully treated with vigabatrin.
                Vigabatrin seems to be an effective and safe antiepileptic drug as primary monotherapy for epilepsy with fewer cognitive side effects than carbamazepine. The clinical efficacy and safety of vigabatrin (VGB) as add-on therapy for pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsies is well established. However, for an objective evaluation, the effects of the drug in the monotherapy of newly diagnosed subjects should be determined. With this aim, VGB was compared, in a randomized, response conditional cross-over study, with carbamazepine (CBZ), the most widely prescribed drug in focal epilepsies. Fifty-one patients with complex partial (CP) seizures were randomly assigned to either the VGB or the CBZ group and evaluated after an initial 4 month period. The cross-over to the alternative drug was carried out, for an analogous period, only in cases with persisting seizures or in the presence of intolerable side effects. Patients who did not respond to either drug were subsequently treated with a combination of VGB and CBZ. No significant difference was revealed in the efficacies of VGB and CBZ; a complete control of seizures was obtained in 17/37 patients (45.9%) treated with VGB and in 20/39 patients (51.3%) treated with CBZ. The side effects were somewhat more frequent (41%) and severe with CBZ than with VGB (21.6%). The power to detect a 20% difference between the two drugs was 75%. The combination of the two drugs suppressed the seizures in 5 out of 14 resistant cases. The preliminary results in this small number of patients are encouraging and suggest that VGB may be considered as a first-line drug for epilepsy with CP seizures and as a valid alternative when other monotherapies are ineffective or poorly tolerated. We evaluated the psychological effects of the antiepilepsy drug vigabatrin in a randomized multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled parallel group study that compared 3 grams oral vigabatrin with placebo as daily add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy whose complex partial seizures were difficult to control. Testing at baseline and after 12 weeks of vigabatrin (n = 83) or placebo (n = 85) used eight measures of cognitive abilities and three of mood and adjustment. The vigabatrin and placebo groups were highly similar at entry into the study. At the end of the study, there were no differences between the vigabatrin and placebo groups on any cognitive variable or on any measure of mood and adjustment. Analysis of the results related to relief from seizures demonstrated only chance findings. In a similar manner, there were no relationships between vigabatrin serum levels at the end of the study and changes on measures of abilities and adjustment. Vigabatrin appears to be a useful antiepilepsy drug with little impact upon tests of either cognitive abilities or quality of life.
This review of randomised controlled trials showed that vigabatrin can reduce seizure frequency in people with drug-resistant partial epilepsy. Short-term follow-up of patients showed that some side effects were associated with its use. Further analysis of longer-term observational studies is required to evaluate how likely patients are to develop visual field defects and whether such side effects are associated with dose and duration of drug use.