Ultrasound guidance improves the success of sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa. Ultrasound vs nerve stimulation multiple injection technique for posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block. Comparative evaluation of ultrasound-guided continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block with stimulating catheter and traditional technique: a prospective-randomized trial. Ultrasound guidance improves success rate of axillary brachial plexus block. Electrical nerve stimulation or ultrasound guidance for lateral sagittal infraclavicular blocks: a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded, comparative study. Ultrasound- or nerve stimulation-guided wrist blocks for carpal tunnel release: a randomized prospective comparative study. Combined ultrasound and neurostimulation guidance for popliteal sciatic nerve block: a prospective, randomized comparison with neurostimulation alone. Ultrasound guidance speeds execution and improves the quality of supraclavicular block. Ultrasonographic guidance improves sensory block and onset time of three-in-one blocks. A randomized trial of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus anaesthesia in upper limb surgery. Ultrasonographic guidance improves the success rate of interscalene brachial plexus blockade. Ultrasound guidance for lateral midfemoral sciatic nerve block: a prospective, comparative, randomized study. A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance for multiple injection axillary brachial plexus block. Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of a perivascular axillary plexus block. Ultrasonographic guidance reduces the amount of local anesthetic for 3-in-1 blocks. Effects of ultrasound guidance on the minimum effective anaesthetic volume required to block the femoral nerve. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block: a comparative study with nerve stimulator-guided method. The comparison of ultrasound treatment and local steroid injection plus splinting in the carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
Real time ultrasound guidance is a recent development in the area of peripheral nerve blockade. There are limited data from prospective randomized trials comparing its efficacy to that of traditional nerve localization techniques. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa when compared with a nerve stimulator-guided technique.
                After Institutional Research Ethics Board approval and informed consent, 74 patients undergoing elective major foot or ankle surgery were randomly assigned to receive a sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa guided by either ultrasonography (group US, transverse view, needle in plane approach above the sciatic nerve bifurcation), or nerve stimulation (group NS, single injection, 10 cm proximal to the knee crease). A standardized local anesthetic admixture (15 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine) was used. Sensory and motor function was assessed by a blinded observer at predetermined intervals for up to 1 hour. Block success was defined as a loss of sensation to pinprick within 30 minutes in the distribution of both tibial and common peroneal nerves.
                Group US had a significantly higher block success rate than group NS (89.2% vs. 60.6%, P = .005), while the procedure time was similar.
                Ultrasound guidance enhances the quality of popliteal sciatic nerve block compared with single injection, nerve stimulator-guided block using either a tibial or peroneal endpoint. Ultrasound guidance resulted in higher success, faster onset, and progression of sensorimotor block, without an increase in block procedure time, or complications. In this prospective, randomised, observer-blinded study we evaluated whether ultrasound guidance can shorten the onset time of popliteal sciatic nerve block as compared to nerve stimulation with a multiple injection technique. Forty-four ASA I-III patients undergoing posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block with 20 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine were randomly allocated to nerve stimulation or ultrasound guided nerve block. A blinded observer recorded onset of sensory and motor blocks, success rates, the need for fentanyl intra-operatively, the requirement for general anaesthesia, procedure-related pain, patient satisfaction and side-effects. Onset times for sensory and motor blocks were comparable. The success rate was 100% for ultrasound guided vs 82% for nerve stimulation (p = 0.116). Ultrasound guidance reduced needle redirections (p = 0.01), were associated with less procedural pain (p = 0.002) and required less time to perform (p = 0.002). Ultrasound guidance reduced the time needed for block performance and procedural pain. Secondary catheter failure has been reported in up to 40% of patients with continuous peripheral nerve blocks resulting in failure to provide pain relief after the initial block wears off. Introduction of stimulating catheters as well as ultrasound for regional anaesthesia has facilitated correct placement of catheter tip, closer to the plexus. This randomized study was conducted to compare the efficacy of continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks using non-stimulating catheter, stimulating catheter and ultrasound-guided catheter placement with nerve stimulation assistance.
                Patients undergoing elective hand surgery were randomly allocated to receive continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block using non-stimulating catheter [group traditional nerve stimulation (TR)], stimulating catheter [group stimulating catheter (ST)] or ultrasound-guided catheter placement with nerve stimulation assistance [group ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation assistance (US)]. Motor and sensory blocks were assessed every 5 min and primary block success was determined at 30 min. After resolution of the primary block, threshold stimulating current and resulting response, spread of drug on re-injection as seen ultrasonographically and the capacity to re-establish block was documented. Complications and need for supplement was noted.
                The primary block success was significantly higher in the US group [96% US, 58% ST, 59% TR (P=0.0005)]. Secondary catheter failure was significantly lower in the US group [9% US, 17% ST, 86% TR (P<0.0001)]. Axillary nerve was blocked more predictably in the US group (100% US, 79% ST, 50% TR (P=0.0003).
                In this study, ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation assistance significantly improved primary success and reduced secondary catheter failure in continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks. The purpose of this study is to determine if real time ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of axillary brachial plexus blockade.
                Patients undergoing elective hand surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Axillary blocks were performed using three motor response endpoints in the nerve stimulator (NS) Group, real-time ultrasound guidance in the ultrasound (US) Group and combined ultrasound and nerve stimulation in the USNS Group. Following administration of a standardized solution containing 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine (total 42 mL), sensory and motor functions were assessed by a blinded observer every five minutes for 30 min. A successful block was defined as complete sensory loss in the median, radial and ulnar nerve distribution by 30 min. The need for local and general anesthesia supplementation and post-block adverse events were documented.
                One hundred and eighty-eight patients completed the study. Block success rate was higher in Groups US and USNS (82.8% and 80.7%) than Group NS (62.9%) (P = 0.01 and 0.03 respectively). Fewer patients in Groups US and USNS required supplemental nerve blocks and/or general anesthesia. Postoperatively, axillary bruising and pain were reported more frequently in Group NS.
                This study demonstrates that ultrasound guidance, with or without concomitant nerve stimulation, significantly improves the success rate of axillary brachial plexus block. Ultrasound guidance is frequently used to perform infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks. In this study, we compared electrical nerve stimulation and ultrasound guidance for the lateral sagittal infraclavicular block.
                Eighty patients, ASA 1-2, were randomized for either nerve stimulation (group NS) or ultrasound-guided blocks (group US). The brachial plexus was anesthetized with 0.6 mL/kg mepivacaine (15 mg/mL) with epinephrine (2.5 microg/mL) in both groups. For ultrasound-guided blocks, local anesthetic was injected cranioposterior to the axillary artery. An observer who was blinded for the method assessed the blocks and questioned the patients. Successful block was defined as analgesia or anesthesia of all five nerves distal to the elbow. The main outcome variables were the time until readiness for surgery, quantified discomfort during the block, and pain related to tourniquet ischemia on a numeric rating scale (0-10).
                Block performance time was 4.3 min (sd 1.3) and 4.1 min (sd 1.3) (P = 0.64) in group NS and group US, respectively. Onset time for sensory block was 13.7 min (sd 6.6) and 13.9 min (sd 5.8), (P = 0.99). The time until readiness for surgery was 18.1 min in both groups (sd 6.6 and 6.0) (P = 0.99). Median discomfort related to the block procedure was 1 in both groups (P = 0.92), and median tourniquet pain was 0.5 in group NS and 1 in group US (P = 32). Differences in success rates, between 85% in group NS and 95% in group US, were not significant (P = 0.26).
                We conclude that favorable results can be obtained when either nerve stimulation or ultrasound guidance is used for lateral sagittal infraclavicular block. Using ultrasound, local anesthetic injection cranioposterior to the artery appears feasible. We hypothesized that ultrasound-guided wrist blocks may be faster to perform, and may increase success rate, compared with nerve stimulation-guided wrist blocks.
                Sixty patients undergoing ambulatory endoscopic carpal tunnel release were randomly allocated to receive median and ulnar nerve blocks using either sensory-motor nerve stimulation (n = 30) or ultrasound guidance (n = 30). Four mL of mepivacaine 1.5% was injected around each nerve. Performance time and onset time of complete sensory block were assessed.
                Median time to perform both median (ultrasound, 55 [48-60] vs. nerve stimulation, 100 [65-150] seconds, P = .002) and ulnar (ultrasound, 57 [50-70] vs. nerve stimulation, 80 [60-105] seconds, P = .02) nerve blocks were significantly shorter in the ultrasound group. Onset time of complete sensory block in the median (ultrasound, 370 [278-459] vs. nerve stimulation, 254 [230-300] seconds, P = .02) and ulnar (ultrasound, 367 [296-420] vs. nerve stimulation, 241 [210-300] seconds, P = .01) nerve areas were shorter in the nerve stimulation group. The success rate was 93% in both groups.
                This randomized prospective study demonstrates that ultrasound-guided wrist nerve blocks are as efficient as those performed with nerve stimulation. Ultrasound imaging, an effective tool to localize peripheral nerves, may facilitate block performance. However, its usefulness during popliteal sciatic nerve block has not been assessed.
                In this prospective, randomized, patient-blinded study, we compared the block time (as the primary end-point) of a popliteal sciatic nerve block with double-injection performed using anatomical landmarks and neurostimulation (NS group; n = 30) versus combined ultrasound and neurostimulation guidance (US-NS group; n = 30). Each block procedure was performed by a single operator. Correct needle placement was defined by a minimal stimulating current < or = 0.5 mA, or, in the US-NS group, by mobilization of the nerve by the needle shaft even if the minimal stimulating current > 0.5 mA. Ten milliliter levobupivacaine 0.5% was administered separately on the tibial and common peroneal nerves without needle adjustment to improve the spread of anesthetic in the US-NS group. All procedures were video-recorded, and a maximum of 7 min was allowed to perform the block. Successful block was defined as complete loss of cold sensation in the sciatic distribution and an inability to perform a plantar and dorsal flexion of the foot at 30 min.
                Five patients in the NS group and three in US-NS group were excluded from the study for prolonged procedure. Block time was not significantly different between groups. The number of needle passes was lower only for the detection of the first nerve in the US-NS group (1 [1-2] vs 2 [1-6]; P < 0.01). A greater success rate was observed at 30 min in the US-NS group (65% vs 16%; P < 0.001).
                Combined ultrasound and neurostimulation guidance does not decrease block time but increases the success rate of popliteal sciatic nerve block observed at 30 min. In this prospective study, we assessed the quality, safety, and execution time of supraclavicular block of the brachial plexus using ultrasonic guidance and neurostimulation compared with a supraclavicular technique that used anatomical landmarks and neurostimulation. It was hypothesized that ultrasonic guidance would increase the proportion of successful blocks, decrease block execution time, and reduce the incidence of complications such as pneumothorax and neuropathy. Eighty patients were randomized into two groups of 40, Group US (supraclavicular block guided in real time by a two-dimensional ultrasonic image, with neurostimulator confirmation of correct needle position) and Group NS (supraclavicular block using the subclavian perivascular approach, also with neurostimulator confirmation). Blocks were performed using bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2% (1:1 vol) with epinephrine 1:200000 as the anesthetic mixture. The onset of motor and sensory block for the musculocutaneous, median, radial, and ulnar nerves was evaluated over a 30 min period. At 30 min 95% of patients in Group US and 85% of patients in Group NS had a partial or complete sensory block of all nerve territories (P = 0.13) and 55% of patients in Group US and 65% of patients in Group NS had a complete block of all nerve territories (P = 0.25). Surgical anesthesia without supplementation was achieved in 85% of patients in Group US and 78% of patients in Group NS (P = 0.28). No patient in Group US and 8% of patients in Group NS required general anesthesia (P = 0.12). The quality of ulnar block was significantly inferior to the quality of block in other nerve territories in Group NS, but not in Group US; the quality of ulnar block was not significantly different between Groups NS and US. The block was performed in an average of 9.8 min in Group NS and 5.0 min in Group US (P = 0.0001). No major complication occurred in either group. We conclude that ultrasound-guided neurostimulator-confirmed supraclavicular block is more rapidly performed and provides a more complete block than supraclavicular block using anatomic landmarks and neurostimulator confirmation.
                Ultrasound-guided neurostimulator-confirmed supraclavicular block is more rapidly performed and provides a block of better quality than supraclavicular block using anatomic landmarks and neurostimulator confirmation. The use of ultrasound reduces the onset time, improves the quality of sensory block, and minimizes the risks associated with the supraclavicular approach for brachial plexus and stellate ganglion blockade. The present study was designed to evaluate whether ultrasound also facilitates the approach for 3-in-1 blocks. Forty patients (ASA physical status II or III) undergoing hip surgery after trauma were randomly assigned to two groups. In the ultrasound (US) group, 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5% was administered under US guidance, whereas in the control group, the same amount and concentration of local anesthetic was administered with the assistance of a nerve stimulator (NS). After US- or NS-based identification of the femoral nerve, the local anesthetic solution was administered, and the distribution of the local anesthetic solution was visualized and recorded on videotape in the US group. The quality and the onset of the sensory block was assessed by using the pinprick test in the central sensory region of each of the three nerves and compared with the same stimulation on the contralateral leg every 10 min for 60 min. The rating was performed using a scale from 100% (uncompromised sensibility) to 0% (no sensory sensation). Heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were measured at short intervals for 60 min. The onset of sensory blockade was significantly shorter in Group US compared with Group NS (US 16 +/- 14 min, NS 27 +/- 16 min, P < 0.05). The quality of the sensory block after injection of the local anesthetic was also significantly better in Group US compared with Group NS (US 15% +/- 10% of initial value, NS 27% +/- 14% of initial value, P < 0.05). A good analgesic effect was achieved in 95% of the patients in the US group and in 85% of the patients in the NS group. In the US group, visualization of the cannula tip, the femoral nerve, the major vessels, and the local anesthetic spread was possible in 85% of patients. Incidental arterial puncture (n = 3) was observed only in the NS group. We conclude that an US-guided approach for 3-in-1 block reduces the onset time, improves the quality of the sensory block and minimizes the risks associated with this regional anesthetic technique. Implications: The onset time and the quality of a regional anesthetic technique for the lower extremity is improved by ultrasonographic nerve identification compared with older techniques. Ultrasound guidance allows real-time identification of relevant anatomy and needle position when performing brachial plexus regional anaesthesia. The aim of this investigation was to determine whether the use of surface ultrasound could improve the quality of brachial plexus anaesthesia for upper limb surgery. Forty patients were randomized to either conventional "landmark-based" plexus anaesthesia, or to an ultrasound-guided approach using a 13 mHz linear array transducer Both interscalene and axillary techniques were used. The use of ultrasound significantly improved the onset and completeness of sensory (P=0.011) and motor (P=0.002) block. Ultrasound guidance also significantly reduced (P=0.012) the incidence of paraesthesia during the performance of the blocks. Ultrasound guidance increases the quality of sensory and motor blockade in brachial plexus regional anaesthesia, and by reducing the incidence of paraesthesia during performance of the blocks, may confer greater safety. The use of ultrasonography in regional anesthetic blocks has rapidly evolved over the past few years. It has been speculated that ultrasound guidance might increase success rates and reduce complications. The aim of our study is to compare the success rate and quality of interscalene brachial plexus blocks performed either with direct ultrasound visualization or with the aid of nerve stimulation to guide needle placement.
                A total of 160 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I-III) scheduled for trauma-related upper arm surgery were included in this randomized study and grouped according to the guidance method used to deliver 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% for interscalene brachial plexus blockade. In the ultrasound group (n = 80), the brachial plexus was visualized with a linear 5 to 10 MHz probe and the spread of the local anesthetic was assessed. In the nerve stimulation group (n = 80), the roots of the brachial plexus were located using a nerve stimulator (0.5 mA, 2 Hz, and 0.1 millisecond bandwidth). The postblock neurologic assessment was performed by a blinded investigator.
                Sensory and motor blockade parameters were recorded at different points of time. Surgical anesthesia was achieved in 99% of patients in the ultrasound vs 91% of patients in the nerve stimulation group (P < .01). Sensory, motor, and extent of blockade was significantly better in the ultrasound group when compared with the nerve stimulation group.
                The use of ultrasound to guide needle placement and monitor the spread of local anesthetic improves the success rate of interscalene brachial plexus block. Block of the sciatic nerve at the midfemoral level is usually performed using nerve stimulation techniques. We investigated the efficacy of ultrasound, combined with nerve stimulation, to locate and block the sciatic nerve at the lateral midfemoral level compared to nerve stimulation alone. Sixty-one patients scheduled for foot and ankle surgery were enrolled in this prospective, randomized study. Thirty patients underwent a lateral block of the sciatic nerve at the midfemoral level guided by ultrasound (group US) and 31 patients received the block without ultrasound (group ES). Once an adequate motor response was obtained using nerve stimulation, 35 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% was administered. The main end-points of the study were: number of attempts to obtain an adequate motor response, success rate of nerve location at the first attempt, quality and duration of both sensory and motor blocks, and anesthetic distribution. The success of sciatic nerve location at the first attempt was significantly more frequent in the US group than in the ES group (76.6% versus 41.9%; P < 0.001). The quality of the sensory block and the tolerance to the pneumatic tourniquet were also significantly better in the US group (P < 0.01). We conclude that ultrasound combined with nerve stimulation improved the quality of the sensory block and the tolerance to the pneumatic tourniquet, reducing the number of attempts to perform sciatic nerve block at the midfemoral level. This prospective, randomized, blinded study tested the hypothesis that ultrasound guidance can shorten the onset time of axillary brachial plexus block as compared with nerve stimulation guidance when using a multiple injection technique.
                Sixty American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I-III patients receiving axillary brachial plexus block with 20 ml ropivacaine, 0.75%, using a multiple injection technique, were randomly allocated to receive either nerve stimulation (group NS, n = 30), or ultrasound guidance (group US, n = 30) for nerve location. A blinded observer recorded the onset of sensory and motor blocks, the need for general anesthesia (failed block) or greater than 100 microg fentanyl (insufficient block) to complete surgery, procedure-related pain, success rate, and patient satisfaction.
                The median (range) number of needle passes was 4 (3-8) in group US and 8 (5-13) in group NS (P = 0.002). The onset of sensory block was shorter in group US (14 +/- 6 min) than in group NS (18 +/- 6 min) (P = 0.01), whereas no differences were observed in onset of motor block (24 +/- 8 min in group US and 25 +/- 8 min in group NS; P = 0.33) and readiness to surgery (26 +/- 8 min in group US and 28 +/- 9 min in group NS; P = 0.48). No failed block was reported in either group. Insufficient block was observed in 1 patient (3%) of group US and 2 patients (6%) of group NS (P = 0.61). Procedure-related pain was reported in 6 patients (20%) of group US and 14 patients (48%) of group NS (P = 0.028); patient acceptance was similarly good in the two groups.
                Multiple injection axillary block with ultrasound guidance provided similar success rates and comparable incidence of complication as compared with nerve stimulation guidance. Traditional approaches to performing brachial plexus blocks via the axillary approach have varying success rates. The main objective of this study was to evaluate if a specific technique of ultrasound guidance could improve the success of axillary blocks in comparison to a two injection transarterial technique.
                Fifty-six ASA physical status I-III patients presenting for elective hand surgery were prospectively randomized to receive an axillary block performed by either a transarterial technique (Group TA) or an ultrasound-guided perivascular approach (Group US). Both groups received a total of 30 ml of 1.5% lidocaine (225 mg) with 5 microg/ml epinephrine. Patients were then evaluated for block onset in specific nerve distributions and whether or not the block acted as a surgical anesthetic.
                Group TA sustained more failures defined as conversion to general anesthesia or the inability to localize the artery [Group TA eight patients (29%) vs. Group US in which 0 patients required conversion to general anesthesia (0%) P < 0.01]. Group US demonstrated a reduction in performance times vs. Group TA (7.9 +/- 3.9 min vs. 11.1 +/- 5.7 min, P < 0.05). By 30 min post-injection, there were no significant differences between groups TA and US in terms of the proportion of patients demonstrating a complete motor or sensory loss.
                Ultrasonographic guidance improves the overall success rate of axillary blocks in comparison to a transarterial technique. Recently it has been demonstrated that the use of ultrasound (US) improves the onset time and the quality of sensory block for 3-in-1 blocks compared with conventional nerve stimulator (NS) techniques. The present study was designed to evaluate if US guidance for 3-in-1 blocks reduces the amount of local anesthetic compared to NS guidance.
                After institutional approval and informed consent, 60 patients undergoing hip surgery following trauma were randomly assigned to three groups of 20 patients each. In group A, the 3-in-1 block was performed using US guidance with 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine. Group B received 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine, and group C received 30 mL 0.5% bupivacaine during NS guidance. The quality and the onset time was assessed by pinprick test in the central sensory region of each of the three targeted nerves and compared with the contralateral leg every 10 minutes for 1 hour by a blinded observer. The rating was undertaken using a scale from 100% (uncompromised sensibility) to 0% (no sensation).
                Overall success for the 3-in-1 block in group A was 95% and in groups B and C 80%. Onset time was significantly shorter in the US-guided group compared with both NS-guided groups (group A 13+/-6 minutes; group B 27+/-12 minutes; and group C 26+/-13 minutes; P < .01 to groups B and C). Quality of sensory block was significantly better in group A (4%+/-5% of initial value) compared with groups B and C (group B 21%+/-11% of initial value, P < .01 to group A; group C 22%+/-19%, P < .01 to group A).
                The amount of local anesthetic for 3-in-1 blocks can be reduced by using US guidance compared with the conventional NS-guided technique. We tested the hypothesis that ultrasound guidance may reduce the minimum effective anaesthetic volume (MEAV50) of ropivacaine 0.5% required to block the femoral nerve compared with nerve stimulation guidance.
                After standard premedication and sciatic nerve block were given, 60 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy were randomly allocated to receive a femoral nerve block with ropivacaine 0.5% using either nerve stimulation (group NS, n = 30) or ultrasound (group US, n = 30) guidance. The volume of the injected solution was varied for consecutive patients based on an up-and-down staircase method according to the response of the previous patient. The initial volume was 12 ml. A double-blinded observer evaluated the occurrence of complete loss of pinprick sensation in the femoral nerve distribution, with concomitant block of the quadriceps muscle: positive or negative responses within 30 min after the injection determined a 3 ml decrease or increase for the next patient, respectively.
                The mean (sd) MEAV50 for femoral nerve block was 15 (4) ml (95% CI, 7-23 ml) in group US and 26 (4) ml (95% CI, 19-33 ml) in group NS (P = 0.002). The effective dose in 95% of cases (ED95) calculated with probit transformation and logistic regression analysis was 22 ml (95% CI, 13-36 ml) in group US, and 41 ml (95% CI, fs 24-66 ml) in group NS.
                Ultrasound guidance provided a 42% reduction in the MEAV of ropivacaine 0.5% required to block the femoral nerve as compared with the nerve stimulation guidance. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of axillary brachial plexus block using an ultrasound-guided method with the nerve stimulator-guided method. We also compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided single-injection with those of double-injection for the quality of the block.
                Ninety patients scheduled for surgery of the forearm or hand were randomly allocated into three groups (n = 30 per group), i.e., nerve stimulator-guided and double-injection (ND) group, ultrasound-guided and double-injection (UD) group, and ultrasound-guided and single-injection (US) group. Each patient received 0.5 ml kg(-1) of 1.5% lidocaine with 5 mg kg(-1) epinephrine. Patients in the ND group received half the volume of lidocaine injected near the median and radial nerves after identification using a nerve stimulator. Patients in the UD group received half the volume of lidocaine injected around the lateral and medial aspects of the axillary artery, while those in the US group were given the entire volume near the lateral aspect of the axillary artery. The extent of the sensory blockade of the seven nerves and motor blockades of the four nerves were assessed 40 min after the performance of axillary brachial plexus block.
                Seventy percent of the patients in the ND and US groups as well as 73% of the patients in the UD group obtained satisfactory sensory and motor blockades. The success rate of performing the block was 90% in patients in the ND and UD groups and 70% in the US group. The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the ND group (20%) compared with that in the US group and the UD group (0%; p = 0.03).
                Ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block, using either single- or double-injection technique, provided excellent sensory and motor blockades with fewer adverse events. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ultrasound treatment to local corticosteroid injection plus splinting in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). There is still limited knowledge on the efficacy of conservative treatment options for CTS.
                Fourty-nine hands of 34 patients with CTS were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to the ultrasound treatment (group A) or local corticosteroid injection plus splinting (group B). The primary outcome measures included clinical parameters such as symptoms severity score, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, functional status score, grip strength and two-point discrimination. The secondary outcome measures were the electrophysiological tests. The examinations were performed at baseline, and then at 4th and 8th weeks.
                At the end of the study, a statistically significant improvement was obtained in all clinical parameters in the group B: VAS pain, severity of symptoms, functional status, grip strength (p < 0.001 for each) and two-point discrimination (p < 0.016). Also the group A showed significant improvements in all clinical parameters (p < 0.001 for each), except for the grip strength. Additionally, significant improvements in the median nerve sensory conduction velocity and distal motor latency were also found in both groups at the end of the 8 week follow-up period. There was no significant difference between the groups in the primary and secondary outcome measures, except for the grip strength.
                Both ultrasound treatment and corticosteroid injection plus splinting were effective on the clinical symptoms and the electrophysiological findings of CTS. Thus, the ultrasound therapy may be an alternative treatment for CTS, particularly in patient who do not accept injection or splinting (Tab. 3, Fig. 2, Ref. 36).
In experienced hands, ultrasound provides at least as good success rates as other methods of peripheral nerve location. Individual studies have demonstrated that ultrasound may reduce complication rates and improve quality, performance time, and time to onset of blocks. Due to wide variations in study outcomes we chose not to combine the studies in our analysis.