Hydroxyurea as a radiation sensitizer in women with carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Hydroxyurea or placebo combined with radiation to treat stages IIIB and IV cervical cancer confined to the pelvis. Treatment of metastatic and recurrent cervix cancer with chemotherapy: a randomised trial comparing hydroxyurea with cisdiamminedichloro-platinum plus methotrexate. Hydroxyurea plus pelvic irradiation versus placebo plus pelvic irradiation in nonsurgically staged stage IIIB cervical cancer. Hydroxyurea: a radiation potentiator in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A randomized double-blind study.
Hydroxyurea was evaluated as a possible radiation sensitizer in 130 evaluable women with Stages IIB and IIIB (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) carcinoma of the uterine cervix. This was a prospective double-blind randomized study in which hydroxyurea or placebo was compared in conjunction with continuous or split-course radiation therapy. Of all patients with Stage IIB cancer without biopsy proof of aortic node metastasis, a significant improvement in survival (P less than 0.01) was achieved in the hydroxyura group (74.0%) as compared to the patients receiving placebo (43.5%). In women with Stage IIIB cervical cancer there was a trend toward longer survival in those receiving hydroxyurea (52.1%) as compared to those receiving placebo (33.3%). However, there was a statistically significant improvement in survival in those women with Stage IIIB cervical cancer who had staging done at operation, were found to have negative para-aortic nodes, and subsequently received continuous radiation therapy (90.9%) as compared to those receiving split-course therapy (29.4%) (P = 0.005). nan In a randomised trial comparing single-agent chemotherapy (hydroxyurea) to combination chemotherapy in advanced cervix cancer, response was seen in 57% (including 13% CR) of patients receiving the combination (DDP + MTX) regimen. Responding patients survived significantly longer (11 months) than either those receiving hydroxyurea or those not responding to combination chemotherapy (4 months). Two patients remain in complete remission for 14+ and 17+ months. Twenty-five patients with FIGO stage IIIB carcinoma of the cervix were entered into a prospective, double-blinded randomized study to evaluate the possible radiation potentiating properties (i.e., improved survival) of the S phase cell cycle specific inhibitor of DNA synthesis hydroxyurea (H). In contrast to our previous randomized trial of patients with FIGO stage IIIB carcinoma of the uterine cervix who were documented to be without paraaortic lymph node metastasis by pretherapy staging paraaortic lymphadenectomy [Piver et al.: J Surg Oncol 35: 129-134, 1987], these patients either refused surgical staging or, because of medical conditions, could not undergo pretherapy paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Patients were to receive 6,000 cGy/6 weeks to the pelvis by megavoltage radiation therapy followed by 2,500 cGy to point A by intracavitary and vaginal radium/cesium. The median pelvic cGy for the Hu patients was 5,967 cGy and for the placebo patients 6,013 cGy. Leukopenia (WBC less than 2,500/mm3) significantly increased in patients given hydroxyurea as compared with those given placebo (P less than 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference relative to anemia, thrombocytopenia, radiation skin reactions, diarrhea, or radiation induced complications requiring surgical correction. The estimated 5 year disease-free interval was 54% for the hydroxyurea patients (median not reached) and 18% for the placebo patients with a median of 11 months. Because of these results, those of our previous reports, and those of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, we believe that hydroxyruea plus pelvic radiation should be the standard against which new potential radiation sensitizers are tested. From June, 1972, to December, 1976, 40 patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) Stage IIB carcinoma of the uterine cervix were entered into a prospective, double-blind, randomized study to evaluate the possible radiation-potentiating properties (i.e., improved survival) of the S-phase cell cycle-specific inhibitor of DNA synthesis, hydroxyurea. All patients were documented to be without aortic lymph node metastasis by pretherapy staging para-aortic lymphadenectomy. All 40 patients were followed up for longer than 5 years (5.2 to 9.2 years) or until death. The double-blind code was not broken until all patients had been followed up for a minimum of 2 to 5 years. Leukopenia (white blood cell count less than 2,500 mm3) was significantly increased in the patients given hydroxyurea as compared to those given placebo (P less than 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference relative to anemia, thrombocytopenia, radiation-induced skin reaction, and radiation-induced intestinal reaction between the patients given placebo or those given hydroxyurea. Life-table survival for the patients given hydroxyurea was 94% as compared to 53% for the patients given placebo (P = 0.006). Only one (5%) patient given hydroxyurea died of cervical cancer. Of the other patients who died in the group given hydroxyurea, all were confirmed by postmortem examination to have been without recurrent cervical cancer. In contrast, 45% (nine) of the patients given placebo died of cervical cancer.
We found no evidence to support the use of hydroxyurea in addition to radiotherapy in the routine treatment of cervix cancer.