A randomized controlled trial of oral versus intravenous iron in chronic kidney disease. Intravenous iron sucrose in peritoneal dialysis patients with renal anemia. Comparison of intravenous iron sucrose to oral iron in the treatment of anemic patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis. A randomized, controlled trial comparing IV iron sucrose to oral iron in anemic patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD. Reduction in recombinant human erythropoietin doses by the use of chronic intravenous iron supplementation. Iron therapy in the pediatric hemodialysis population. Multiple micronutrients including iron are not more effective than iron alone for improving hemoglobin and iron status of Malian school children. Comparison of oral versus intravenous iron therapy in predialysis patients of chronic renal failure receiving recombinant human erythropoietin. [Iron supplementation during erythropoietin therapy in patients on hemodialysis]. Effect of intravenous iron supplementation on erythropoiesis in erythropoietin-treated premature infants. Intravenous iron sucrose in Chinese hemodialysis patients with renal anemia. Effect of twice weekly versus daily iron treatment in Turkish children with iron deficiency anemia. A randomized study of oral vs intravenous iron supplementation in patients with progressive renal insufficiency treated with erythropoietin. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous iron sucrose in restless legs syndrome. The effect of correction of mild anemia in severe, resistant congestive heart failure using subcutaneous erythropoietin and intravenous iron: a randomized controlled study. A prospective randomized, controlled trial of intravenous versus oral iron for moderate iron deficiency anaemia of pregnancy. Failure of twice-weekly iron supplementation to increase blood haemoglobin and serum ferritin concentrations: results of a randomized controlled trial.
It is unknown whether intravenous iron or oral iron repletion alone can correct anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We conducted a randomized multicenter controlled trial in adult anemic, iron-deficient non-dialysis CKD (ND-CKD) patients (>or=stage 3) not receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).
                The participants were randomized to receive either a sodium ferric gluconate complex (intravenous iron) 250 mg i.v. weekly x 4 or ferrous sulfate (oral iron) 325 mg t.i.d. x 42 days. Hemoglobin (Hgb), ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT) were measured serially, and the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQoL) questionnaire was administered on days 1 and 43. The primary outcome variable was change from baseline (CFB) to endpoint in Hgb values.
                Seventy-five patients were analyzed (intravenous iron n = 36, oral iron n = 39). CFB in Hgb was similar in the two groups (intravenous iron 0.4 g/dl vs. oral iron 0.2 g/dl, p = n.s.). However, the increase in Hgb was only significant with intravenous iron (p < 0.01). In comparison to oral iron, intravenous iron achieved greater improvements in ferritin (232.0 +/- 160.8 vs. 55.9 +/- 236.2 ng/ml, p < 0.001) and TSAT (8.3 +/- 7.5 vs. 2.9 +/- 8.8%, p = 0.007). Intravenous iron caused greater improvements in KDQoL scores than oral iron (p < 0.05). The most common side effect reported with intravenous iron was hypotension, while constipation was more common with oral iron.
                Oral and intravenous iron similarly increase Hgb in anemic iron-depleted ND-CKD patients not receiving ESAs. Although in comparison to oral iron, intravenous iron may result in a more rapid repletion of iron stores and greater improvement in quality of life, it exposes the patients to a greater risk of adverse effects and increases inconvenience and cost.
                Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel. To explore the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) iron sucrose in maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD).
                Randomized, controlled, parallel-group single-center trial.
                Blood Purification Center of Chaoyang, Beijing Capital University of Medical Science, China.
                46 patients on PD were involved in this trial. 26 patients received IV iron sucrose (200 mg iron) once per week for 4 weeks then once every other week for a further 4 weeks. The other 20 patients received oral ferrous succinate, 200 mg three times per day, for 8 weeks. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, serum ferritin (SF) level, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) were assessed at baseline and then again after 2, 4, and 8 weeks of treatment.
                There were no differences between the IV and oral groups in terms of sex, age, duration of PD, mean dialysate dosage per day, erythropoietin dosage per week, or hematological parameters at baseline. After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, mean Hb and Hct were significantly increased in the IV group and were also significantly higher than those in the oral group. Levels of SF and TSAT were also significantly increased in the IV group, and significantly higher than in the oral group. After 8 weeks, the response rate in the IV group was 94.8%, which was significantly higher than that in the oral group. The mean erythropoietin dose was significantly lower in the IV group than in the oral group. Hb, Hct, SF, and TSAT levels were maintained between 4 and 8 weeks in the IV group despite the decrease in dose frequency. There were no adverse events with IV iron. Eight patients in the oral group had adverse gastrointestinal effects.
                IV iron sucrose is safe in PD patients. It increases Hb levels and serum iron parameters more effectively than oral iron; it is well tolerated and can permit reductions in the required dose of erythropoietin. Few studies compare oral to intravenous (IV) iron for managing anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not on dialysis.
                We enrolled 96 CKD anemic patients on erythropoietin in a randomized, open-label, multicenter, controlled study. Patients received 29 days of oral FeSO4 (325 mg t.i.d.) or intravenous (IV) iron sucrose (5 doses of 200 mg weekly). Assessments were made up to 14 days after the last dose. Primary endpoints were changes in hemoglobin and ferritin, and clinical success was evaluated from the percent of patients with combined endpoints of rises in hemoglobin/ferritin, hemoglobin/ferritin/TSAT, and hemoglobin/TSAT.
                There was no significant difference in hemoglobin values between IV and oral therapy. IV iron patients had greater increases in mean serum ferritin (288 ng/ml, p < 0.0001) compared to oral iron patients (-5.1 ng/ml, p = NS). IV iron patients with baseline ferritin < 100 ng/ml had a greater increase in hemoglobin (1.4 g/dl) compared to oral iron patients (0.9 g/dl) (p < 0.05). More IV iron patients (54.2%) attained hemoglobin values > 11.0 g/dl compared to oral iron patients (31.3%, p = 0.028), and met hemoglobin/ferritin (62.5%), hemoglobin/TSAT (47.9%), hemoglobin/ferritin/TSAT (43.8%), and ferritin/TSAT criteria (54.2%) than oral iron patients (0, 22.9, 0, and 0%, respectively). There were no serious side effects.
                These CKD patients had increases in both hemoglobin and ferritin following IV iron therapy, whereas those treated with oral iron had increases in hemoglobin without increases in iron stores. Iron sucrose, given weekly as 200 mg IV push over 5 min is an effective and safe anemia treatment in this population. Although iron deficiency frequently complicates anemia in patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD (ND-CKD), the comparative treatment value of IV iron infusion and oral iron supplementation has not been established.
                In a randomized, controlled multicenter trial, we compared the efficacy of iron sucrose, given as 1 g in divided IV doses over 14 days, with that of ferrous sulfate, given 325 mg orally thrice daily for 56 days in patients with ND-CKD stages 3 to 5, Hb < or =11 g/dL, TSAT < or =25%, and ferritin < or =300 ng/mL. Epoetin/darbepoetin therapy, if any, was not changed for eight weeks prior to or during the study.
                The proportion of patients achieving the primary outcome (Hb increase > or =1 g/dL) was greater in the IV iron treatment group than in the oral iron treatment group (44.3% vs. 28.0%, P= 0.0344), as was the mean increase in Hb by day 42 (0.7 vs. 0.4 g/dL, P= 0.0298). Compared to those in the IV iron group, patients in the oral iron treatment group showed a greater decline in GFR during the study (-4.40 vs. -1.45 mL/min/1.73m2, P= 0.0100). No serious adverse drug events (ADE) were seen in patients administered IV iron sucrose as 200 mg IV over two to five minutes, but drug-related hypotension, including one event considered serious, occurred in two females weighing less than 65 kg after 500 mg doses were given over four hours.
                IV iron administration using 1000 mg iron sucrose in divided doses is superior to oral iron therapy in the management of ND-CKD patients with anemia and low iron indices. We have compared the efficacy of oral to intravenous iron for the chronic maintenance of iron stores in hemodialysis patients. Fifty-two hemodialysis patients with initial serum ferritin greater than 100 ng/mL and transferrin saturation greater than 15% were randomly assigned to one of two groups: those receiving oral iron therapy (n = 32) and those receiving intravenous iron dextran (100 mg twice weekly) (n = 20). At study completion (4 months), the mean hematocrit was significantly higher in the intravenous group than in the oral iron group (34.4% +/- 0.7% v 31.8% +/- 0.4%, respectively; P < 0.05), the final mean recombinant human erythropoietin dose was 46% lower in the intravenous iron group than in the oral group (4,050 +/- 634 U/treatment v 7,563 +/- 378 U/treatment; P < 0.05), and the mean serum ferritin was significantly higher in the intravenous group than in the oral iron group (753.9 +/- 30.2 ng/mL v 157.3 +/- 15.4 ng/mL, respectively; P < 0.05). We have found that administering iron intravenously instead of orally for chronic maintenance iron supplementation in hemodialysis patients resulted in improved erythropoiesis. We hypothesize that most hemodialysis patients have inadequate iron stores for optimal erythropoiesis when currently recommended levels of ferritin and transferrin saturation are used to guide therapy, and that the chronic use of intravenous iron could reduce recombinant human erythropoietin requirements by maximizing iron stores. The improvement in erythropoiesis was accompanied, however, by an increase in iron indices to levels that could be indicative of tissue iron overload. Future studies must be performed to determine whether lower doses of intravenous iron dextran would improve erythropoiesis without causing potential organ iron overload. Iron therapy maintains iron stores and optimizes the response to recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) in patients with end-stage renal failure. Information is limited, however, regarding the preferential route of iron administration in pediatric patients receiving hemodialysis. Therefore, we prospectively randomized 35 iron-replete patients (aged >1 to <20 years) to receive up to 16 weeks of maintenance i.v. ( n=17) or daily oral ( n=18) iron. Eligible patients had received hemodialysis for >2 months, had a baseline transferrin saturation [TSAT] >20%, and were receiving maintenance r-HuEPO. Treatment arms were evenly distributed with respect to baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, with no statistically significant differences in baseline hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), reticulocyte Hb content (CHr), serum ferritin (SF), TSAT, or r-HuEPO dose. In the 35 patients, i.v. iron dextran and not oral iron was associated with a significant increase (138.5 to 259.1 ng/ml, P=0.003) in SF. A comparison of the change in SF between the i.v. iron group and the oral iron group was also significant ( P=0.001). Whereas only i.v. iron was associated with a significant decrease in the dose of r-HuEPO (234.0 to 157.6 U/kg per week, P=0.046) and an increase of the CHr (29.2 to 30.1 pg, P=0.049), these changes were not significantly different from those experienced by patients in the oral iron group. In both groups, the Hct remained stable and in neither group was there a significant change in the TSAT. In summary, although both oral and i.v. iron maintained patients in an iron-replete state in this short-term study, only i.v. therapy allowed for a significant improvement in iron stores. Iron deficiency and anemia remain among the most important global public health problems facing school children. Helminth infections often peak at school age and aggravate nutritional risks. We conducted a 12-wk randomized controlled trial in 406 Malian anemic schoolchildren infected with Schistosoma hematobium to examine the effects of 2 doses of praziquantel (P) (40 mg/kg body weight), P + 60 mg/d iron (Fe), and/or a multiple micronutrient supplement (MM) that included 18 mg/d Fe. Supplements were administered to the children each school day (5 d/wk) throughout the study. Changes in hemoglobin (Hb), serum ferritin (SF), and serum transferrin receptors (s-TfR) were followed. We also examined interactions between Fe and MM supplements on Hb and SF concentrations and malaria incidence. The effects of Fe on Hb and SF concentrations were greater than the effects of P alone and MM with or without added Fe at 6 and 12 wk (P < 0.001). In all groups, s-TfR decreased at 6 and 12 wk compared with baseline. The decrease was most pronounced in the P + Fe group compared with the other 3 groups at wk 6 (P = 0.05). Fe and MM interacted negatively at wk 6 and 12 to affect Hb (beta = -0.43, 95% CI = -0.77, -0.09; P = 0.01 and beta = -0.47, 95% CI = -0.83, -0.11; P = 0.01, respectively) and SF (beta = -0.42, 95% CI = -25.60, 12.31; P < 0.001, and beta = -0.37, 95% CI = -0.63, -0.12; P = 0.004, respectively). Malaria incidence was higher in the groups treated with added Fe (relative risk: 1.66; 95% CI: 0.75, 3.67). In this context, MM with added iron were not more effective than Fe without MM. Fe supplementation of schoolchildren with 60 mg/d for anemia control should be considered carefully. To compare oral versus intravenous iron in pre-dialysis patients of chronic renal failure (CRF) receiving recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO).
                The study was undertaken in 40 adult patients of chronic renal failure. The patients were randomly divided into two groups A and B of 20 patients each. Group A patients were given oral iron and group B patients were given intravenous iron. All patients in both groups were given recombinant human erythropoietin 2000 IU twice weekly subcutaneously. The study was carried for up to three months. Patients were monitored every month for renal parameters and haematological parameters which included haemoglobin, reticulocyte count and packed cell volume. Ferrokinetic studies were done at baseline and at three months.
                It was observed that haematological parameters showed significant statistical improvement in the intravenous iron group as compared to group A (oral iron group). The ferrokinetic studies revealed that serum iron, serum ferritin and transferrin saturation, decreased significantly in oral iron group, whereas significant increase was seen in group B (intravenous iron group). None of the patients developed any adverse effects because of erythropoietin or iron therapy.
                Concomitant use of intravenous iron is better than oral iron in CRF patients treated with rHuEPO. The intravenous route of iron administration may be a preferred route along with rHuEPO therapy, more so in the Indian context where prevalence of iron deficiency anaemia is fairly high. The development of secondary anaemia is a constant associated phenomenon of chronic renal failure. During its treatment by recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) erythropoiesis is accelerated and this increases demands on the supply of dietary erythropoietic precursors (Fe, pyridoxine, folic acid, vitamin B12). In particular as regards iron, frequently the dietary amount is not sufficient and supplementation is necessary. The objective of the present work is to compare oral and intravenous iron supplementation in the treatment of secondary anaemia by rHuEPO in patients with chronic renal failure treated by haemodialysis. A group of haemodialyzed patients (n = 61) treated with erythropoietin, where the serum ferritin concentration had dropped beneath 300 ng/ml, or the transferrin concentration below 0.20 was divided at random into two sub-groups. To group "A" Actiferrin was administered 3 x 1 cps/d (Ferrosi sulfas heptahydricus, corresponding to 34.5 mg elemental Fe and serine 129 mg per capsule, i.e. a total of 724.5 mg elemental Fe per week). To group "A" Ferrum-Lek was administered 1 vial per week by the i.v. route (Ferri oxidum saccharatum, corresponding to 100 mg elemental iron per week). The two groups were comparable as to the mean erythropoietin dose (50 U/kg per week) and the patients' mean age (61 years), the male/female ratio and the spectrum of basic diseases. After six weeks of treatment a comparable increase of the haematocrit and serum iron concentration was observed in both groups. As to transferrin saturation, there was a more marked increment in the intravenously supplemented group. The serum ferritin values in group "A" declined, while in group "F" they increased. After both types of iron supplementation a comparable increase of the haematocrit and serum iron concentration occurred, the iron reserves represented by serum ferritin differed however and from the long-term aspect they are in favour of intravenous iron supplementation in haemodialyzed patients treated with erythropoietin. To test the efficacy and safety of combining intravenous iron in amounts approximating the in utero iron accretion rate and the postnatal iron loss with erythropoietin (EPO) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.
                A prospective, controlled, randomized, unmasked trial lasting 21 days was performed in 29 clinically stable VLBW infants <31 weeks' gestation and <1300 g birth weight not treated with red blood cell transfusions during the study period. Mean (+/- standard error of the mean) age at study entry was 23 +/- 2.9 days. After a 3-day run-in baseline period in which all participants received oral supplements of 9 mg/kg/day of iron polymaltose complex (IPC), participants were randomized to receive 18 days of treatment with: 1) oral IPC alone (oral iron group); 2) 300 U of recombinant human EPO (r-HuEPO) kg/day and daily oral IPC (EPO + oral iron group); 3) 2 mg/kg/day of intravenous iron sucrose, r-HuEPO, and oral iron (intravenous iron + EPO group). To assess efficacy of the 3 treatments, serial blood samples were analyzed for hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), reticulocyte count, red blood cell indices and plasma levels of transferrin, transferrin receptor (TfR), ferritin, and iron. Oxidant injury was assessed before and after treatment by plasma and urine levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and o-tyrosine.
                At the end of treatment, Hb, Hct, reticulocyte count, and plasma TfR were markedly higher in both of the EPO-treated groups, compared with the oral iron group. At study exit a trend toward increasing Hb and Hct levels and significantly higher reticulocyte counts were observed in the intravenous iron + EPO group, compared with the EPO + oral iron group. During treatment, plasma ferritin levels increased significantly in the intravenous iron + EPO group and decreased significantly in the other 2 groups. By the end of treatment, ferritin levels were significantly higher in the intravenous iron + EPO group compared with the other 2 groups. Although plasma and urine MDA or o-tyrosine did not differ among the 3 groups, plasma MDA was significantly greater in the subgroup of intravenous iron + EPO participants sampled at the end of the 2-hour parenteral iron infusion, compared with values observed immediately before and after parenteral iron-dosing.
                In stable VLBW infants receiving EPO treatment, parenteral supplementation with 2 mg/kg/day of iron sucrose results in a small, but significant, augmentation of erythropoiesis beyond that of r-HuEPO and enteral iron alone. However, to reduce the potential adverse effects of parenteral iron/kg/day on increasing plasma ferritin levels and on causing oxidative injury, we suggest that the parenteral iron dose used should be reduced and/or the time of infusion extended to maintain a serum iron concentration below the total iron-binding capacity. Renal anemia is one of the commonest complications of chronic renal failure. Iron deficiency is the most common factor which affects the efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) therapy. Intravenous (i.v.) iron preparations are commonly used in Western countries, but iron sucrose is seldom used in Chinese patients on maintenance hemodialysis. The aim of the present study was to explore the safety and efficacy of i.v. iron sucrose in Chinese patients on maintenance hemodialysis and to explore the optimal administration frequency.
                One hundred and thirty-six patients on maintenance hemodialysis were involved in this randomized, controlled, parallel-group, single-center trial. Seventy patients received i.v. iron sucrose (Venofer(R), delivering 100 mg iron) twice a week for 8 weeks, then once a week for another 4 weeks. The other 66 patients received oral (p.o.) ferrous succinate 200 mg t.i.d. for 12 weeks. Levels of serum ferritin (SF), transferrin saturation (TSAT), hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) were assessed at baseline and then again after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment.
                There were no differences between i.v. and p.o. groups in terms of sex, age, duration of hemodialysis, dialysis frequency per week, EPO dosage per week, the level of intact parathyroid hormone, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, or hematological parameters at baseline. After 8 and 12 weeks of treatment, mean Hb concentration and Hct were significantly increased in the i.v. group, and were also significantly higher than those in the p.o. group. Levels of SF and TSAT were also significantly increased in the i.v. group, and significantly higher than in the p.o. group. After 8 weeks, the response rate in the i.v. group was 88.6%, which was significantly higher than that in the p.o. group. The mean EPO dose was significantly lower in the i.v. group than the p.o. group. Hb, Hct, SF and TSAT levels were maintained between 8 and 12 weeks in the i.v. group despite the decrease in dose frequency. There were no adverse events related to i.v. iron administration. Twenty-two patients in the p.o. group had adverse gastrointestinal effects. After 12 weeks, the cost of EPO + i.v. iron was significantly higher than the cost of EPO + p.o. iron.
                Intravenous iron sucrose can effectively increase serum iron parameters and Hb levels in Chinese patients on maintenance hemodialysis and is well tolerated. Infusion of i.v. iron sucrose 100 mg per week can maintain serum iron parameters and Hb levels in Chinese patients on maintenance hemodialysis and can permit reductions in the required dose of EPO. However, the total cost of i.v. iron is relatively high.
                Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel. This study was designed to propose a more practical, effective, safer, inexpensive, and manageable alternative treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) for the developing countries. The study involves 94 children between the ages of 5 months and 6 years who had been seen in the authors' hospital and diagnosed as having iron deficiency anemia. Ninety-four children with IDA were randomly divided into two groups: 48 children comprised the first group, which was administered conventional treatment, and 46 children comprised the second group, which was administered intermittent treatment involving iron administration 2 days a week. Twenty-three children whose age and gender distribution were compatible with the other groups were included in the study as the control group. Both groups were reevaluated for their initial hematologic parameters at the end of the treatment. When the parameters of both groups were compared with the parameters of the control group after the treatment, there were no differences between hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, serum iron, and ferritin levels of conventional and intermittent treatment groups. With respect to certain parameters, such as red cell distribution, serum iron binding capacity, transferrin saturation, transferrin receptor, and transferrin receptor/log ferritin, however, intermittent treatment was superior to the conventional treatment method (p <.05). In IDA, when a conventional treatment method or an intermittent treatment method is used, there are no differences between the hematological parameters. In fact, the intermittent treatment method has been found to be superior in many parameters. Correction of anaemia as a result of renal failure improves cardiovascular function and also provides significant cognitive and emotional benefits. The most appropriate route for iron supplementation has not been determined for patients with chronic renal failure who are not yet on dialysis.
                Forty-five anaemic patients with progressive renal insufficiency (PRI) were prospectively randomized to receive oral (ferrous sulphate 200 mg tds) or intravenous (300 mg iron sucrose monthly) iron treatment. Erythropoietin (rHuEpo) was simultaneously commenced and the dose adjusted according to a pre-established protocol.
                There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics between the two groups. The average follow-up was 5.2 months. Three patients suffered possible allergic reactions to iron sucrose. Haemoglobin response and changes in red cell hypochromasia were similar in the two groups, but serum ferritin was significantly higher in the intravenous group. The starting dose of rHuEpo could be temporarily discontinued in 43% of patients on oral iron and 33% of patients receiving iron sucrose (NS). rHuEpo was increased after 3 months in 9% of patients on oral iron and 19% of patients receiving iron sucrose (NS). Final doses of rHuEpo were 33.5 (0-66) and 41.6 (0-124) U/kg/week respectively in the oral and intravenous groups (NS). Although gastro-intestinal symptoms were more commonly reported in patients taking oral iron, these were mild according to scores on visual analogue scales. Dietary protein and energy intake were not significantly different in the two groups at 0, 3 and 6 months.
                In pre-dialysis patients, the efficacy of monthly 300 mg iron sucrose given intravenously is not superior with regard to haemoglobin response and rHuEpo dose as compared with a daily oral dose of 600 mg of ferrous sulphate or equivalent. Where intravenous iron is preferred, lower doses may help to reduce the incidence of allergic or "free iron" reactions, especially in patients with low body mass. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether high-dose intravenous (IV) iron sucrose could improve symptoms and change brain iron concentrations in idiopathic RLS.
                The study was a randomized, parallel-group double-blind study of 1000mg iron sucrose given IV versus placebo. Primary measures of the clinical status were global rating scale (GRS) and periodic leg movements of sleep (PLMS). Primary measures of brain iron status were CSF ferritin and MRI-determined iron in the substantia nigra.
                At the time of the interim analysis there were 7 placebo and 11 iron-treated subjects. At 2-weeks post-treatment, iron treatment resulted in a small but significant increase in CSF ferritin and a decrease in RLS severity (GRS) but did not change PLMS or MRI iron index. None of the secondary outcomes changed with treatment. There was no single case of clear treatment benefit in any of the patients. This interim analysis revealed an effect size that was too small to allow for adequate power to find significant differences with the planed 36-subject enrollment for either the primary objective outcome of PLMS or any of the secondary outcomes. The study was stopped at this planned break-point given the lack of both adequate power and any indication for clinically significant benefit.
                High-dose IV iron failed to demonstrate the robust changes reported in three prior open-label studies. Differences in iron formulation, dosing regiment, and peripheral iron status may explain some of the discrepancies between this and previous IV iron treatment studies. This is a randomized controlled study of anemic patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF) to assess the effect of correction of the anemia on cardiac and renal function and hospitalization.
                Although mild anemia occurs frequently in patients with CHF, there is very little information about the effect of correcting it with erythropoietin (EPO) and intravenous iron.
                Thirty-two patients with moderate to severe CHF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III to IV) who had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of < or =40% despite maximally tolerated doses of CHF medications and whose hemoglobin (Hb) levels were persistently between 10.0 and 11.5 g% were randomized into two groups. Group A (16 patients) received subcutaneous EPO and IV iron to increase the level of Hb to at least 12.5 g%. In Group B (16 patients) the anemia was not treated. The doses of all the CHF medications were maintained at the maximally tolerated levels except for oral and intravenous (IV) furosemide, whose doses were increased or decreased according to the clinical need.
                Over a mean of 8.2+/-2.6 months, four patients in Group B and none in Group A died of CHF-related illnesses. The mean NYHA class improved by 42.1% in A and worsened by 11.4% in B. The LVEF increased by 5.5% in A and decreased by 5.4% in B. The serum creatinine did not change in A and increased by 28.6% in B. The need for oral and IV furosemide decreased by 51.3% and 91.3% respectively in A and increased by 28.5% and 28.0% respectively in B. The number of days spent in hospital compared with the same period of time before entering the study decreased by 79.0% in A and increased by 57.6% in B.
                When anemia in CHF is treated with EPO and IV iron, a marked improvement in cardiac and patient function is seen, associated with less hospitalization and renal impairment and less need for diuretics. Iron deficiency anaemia is the most common deficiency disorder in the world, affecting more than one billion people, with pregnant women at particular risk.
                We conducted a single site, prospective, nonblinded randomized-controlled trial to compare the efficacy, safety, tolerability and compliance of standard oral daily iron versus intravenous iron.
                We prospectively screened 2654 pregnant women between March 2007 and January 2009 with a full blood count and iron studies, of which 461 (18%) had moderate IDA. Two hundred women matched for haemoglobin concentration and serum ferritin level were recruited.
                Patients were randomized to daily oral ferrous sulphate 250 mg (elemental iron 80 mg) with or without a single intravenous iron polymaltose infusion.
                Prior to delivery, the intravenous plus oral iron arm was superior to the oral iron only arm as measured by the increase in haemoglobin level (mean of 19.5 g/L vs. 12 g/L; P < 0.001); the increase in mean serum ferritin level (222 microg/L vs. 18 ug/L; P < 0.001); and the percentage of mothers with ferritin levels below 30 microg/L (4.5% vs. 79%; P < 0.001). A single dose of intravenous iron polymaltose was well tolerated without significant side effects.
                Our data indicate that intravenous iron polymaltose is safe and leads to improved efficacy and iron stores compared to oral iron alone in pregnancy-related IDA. In order to increase the intestinal absorption of iron whilst simultaneously minimising the side-effects and thus increasing compliance, once- or twice-weekly, instead of daily, iron supplementation has been widely recommended. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in western Kenya, a tablet of ferrous dextran (containing 60 mg elemental iron) or an identical-looking placebo tablet was provided twice-weekly for 12 months to each child or adult investigated. At baseline each subject had a moderately low blood concentration of haemoglobin (Hb). Initial Hb and serum ferritin (SF) concentrations were determined and each subject was tested for malarial and helminth infection and treated, if necessary, with the appropriate anthelminthic drug(s). Overall, 200 children (aged 4-15 years) and 129 adults (aged 16-63 years) completed the 12-month study. At baseline, 47.5% of the children and 58.1% of the adults were anaemic, hookworm (detected in 60.0% of the children and 69.9% of the adults) was the most common helminth infection, and malaria was endemic. The results of bivariate analyses indicated that twice-weekly iron supplementation had no significant effect on blood Hb or SF concentrations, either in the children or the adults investigated. The results were confirmed in multiple linear-regression analyses, which revealed that the predictors of the final Hb concentration in the children investigated were age and infection, after enrollment, with Ascaris lumbricoides. Gender and the serum concentration of alpha-1-antichymotrypsin (ACT) at final follow-up were predictors of the final SF concentration in the children. In adults, the predictors of the final Hb concentration were gender and HIV infection, and the predictors of the final SF concentration were age and the serum concentration of ACT at the final follow-up. Twice-weekly iron supplementation did not increase Hb or iron stores in children or adults. Since compliance appeared to be high, this lack of effect may be the result of an inadequate dose of iron or of subjects who have deficiencies in micronutrients other than iron.
The included studies provide strong evidence for increased ferritin and transferrin saturation levels, together with a small increase in haemoglobin, in patients with CKD who were treated with IV iron compared with oral iron. From a limited body of evidence, we identified a significant reduction in ESA requirements in patients treated with IV iron, and found no significant difference in mortality. Adverse effects were reported in only 50% of included studies. We therefore suggest that further studies that focus on patient-centred outcomes are needed to determine if the use of IV iron is justified on the basis of reductions in ESA dose and cost, improvements in patient quality of life, and with few serious adverse effects.